Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/09/24 - Agenda Packet - Planning Commission u • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO ~UCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Roll Call Chairman Fletcher Vice Chairman Munoz Stewart- Howdyshell _ Wimberly '..=II.. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ' September 9, 2008 Regular Meeting Minutes III: PRESENTATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS -IV: „PUBLIC HEARINGS. ,;. ; The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES - A request for architectural review of 50 single-family residential homes on 9.85 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 du/acre), located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04, and 06. On August 9, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further 1 of 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA SEPTMBER 24, 2008 jtnxcHo CUCAMONGA environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 du/acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14- 24 du/acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077- 422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008- 00160, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163.. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 18797 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast • 2of6 • • - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~GHO SEPTMBER 24, 2008 CUCAMONGA corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community-APN:10I7-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 - CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC -Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. APN:10I7-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008- 00161, Conditional Use Permit/Development Review DRC2008-00163, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. I. PUBLIC SLOPING MEETING FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) DRC2008-00381 FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN) DRC2008-00383, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2008-00384, AND AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA01-02) DRC2008-00385 - FOREST CITY COMMERCIAL - 3 of 6 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO SEPTMBER 24, 2008 CUCAMONGA An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in an SEIR far a potential build out proposal forthe Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Foothill Boulevard to the south, Base Line Road to the north, Day Creek Boulevard to the west, and Interstate I-15 to the east. - ~ ~V:; -: DIRECTOR'. REP-.ORTS :: = J. DEVELOPMENT CODE INTERPRETATION - DRC2008-00746 - A request for an interpretation from the Planning Commission regarding the definition of setbacks for flag lots per Development Code Section 17.02.140, Definitions. - -"-' VI. PUBLIC CO1VIlVIENTS. ~ ~`:- This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. ° r Y~IL"';"COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS°:~~ ~' °#'' ~' . ., . _ .,v -; 'Y:III.. ADJOURNMENT ~ " The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18, 2008, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. ~~ • • 4 of 6 • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~~tin SEPTMBER 24, 2008 CUCe.~oNCe If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments:' There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. 5of6 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R~~HO SEPTMBER 24, 2008 Coce.MONCn APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us • • 6of6 Vicinity Map Planning Commission September 24, 2008 8,~,~ • Q ~ Meeting Location: " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive .\ • rc; a': ~~~ , ~'; i~r ` } . ro4b- J ry: ~,5.: T H E C I T Y O F - RAN CII O CUCAM~ONGA Staff Report DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES - A request for architectural review of 50 single-family residential homes on 9.85 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04, and 06. Dn August 9, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 5 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Water of Life Church, City of Fontana West - Existing Single-Family Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) South - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) East - Water of Life Church, City of Fontana West - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) • D. Site Characteristics: The project is located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue and slopes gently from north to south. The subdivision of the 9.95-acre site into 50 residential lots was approved on August 9, 2006, (SUBTT17919). There is an ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 • Page 2 existing house on the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue, which is not part of this development and will remain in place but whose access will. be moved from Miller Avenue to a new street within the proposed project. The site will take access off of two existing streets, Firestone Drive and Morning Crest Place. There is an existing residential development to the north, south, and west of the site and an existing church to the east, across East Avenue in the City of Fontana. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes constructing 50 single-family dwelling units on-site. The proposed density of the project will be approximately 5 dwelling units per acre, which is in the lower range of the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project consists of three floor plans ranging in size from 2,527 to 3,527 square feet. The project will have 13 single-story units and 37 two-story units. Plan 1 is a single-story unit, and Plans 2 and 3 are two-story units. Each plan will have 4 different elevations. Plan 3 will have a garage located at the rear of the house which will be accessed by a driveway that will run along the side of the house. Plan 3 will also have the option available for additional rooms above the garage. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Low-Medium Development District, including lot dimensions, building setbacks, lot coverage, and building heights. B. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee (Stewart, Munoz, • Nicholson) on August 19, 2008. The Committee recommended approval of the project with the following changes: (1) eliminate the use of the "Hollywood driveway" and entry gates on Model 3, (2) replace the two-story model on Lot 8 with a single-story model (for privacy issues), and (3) make several design changes to several of the models. The applicant has removed the "Hollywood driveways" and entry gates, replaced the two-story model on Lot 8 with a single-story (and replaced the single-story on Lot 9 with a two-story model) and made the requested design changes (siding treatment on Model 1 B, roof overhang, and columns on Model 3B and resized the shutters on a number of models). The exchange of the models on Lot 8 and 9 will require the applicant to do a Lot Line Adjustment to make the setbacks compliant with City requirements. Staff feels that the applicant has adequately responded to resolve the Committee's concerns. C. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on August 11, 2008. A total of 5 neighbors attended. The only concern raised at the meeting was from a neighbor who lives north of Lot 8. The neighbor felt that he would have less privacy in his rear yard if the proposed two-story model was built on the lot. With staff and Design Review Committee input, it was determined that the best solution was to switch the proposed models on Lots 8 and 9. This change will replace the two-story house originally proposed for Lot 8 with asingle-story. This change should greatly reduce the neighbor's privacy concerns. D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 9, 2006, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or • supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT • DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 Page 3 to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Development Review DRC2008-00143 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In that the applicant proposes building 50 single-family residences on the previously approved 50-lot Tentative Tract Map and only proposes a minor Lot Line Adjustment to the previously approved map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. In that the previously approved lots are surrounded by existing single-family residential development and the proposed residences meet all development criteria outlined in the Etiwanda Specific plan and the City's Development Code. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2008-00143. • • CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2008-00143 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, ^,~,~ R. ~'~4 ~ - Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Pla ing Director JRT:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D - Site Utilization Plan - Site Plan - Landscape Plan - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit E -Grading Plans Exhibit F -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Report Exhibit G -Design Review Comments dated August 19, 2008 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00143 A-3 • • C~ ii II II II II I I II I II II I I I ~I •I II w I I I I c I I 4~~ I __ I I ~ appl ~ I I~ 1- ~ ~ pC 1~1 I I I ~ _ ~__ ~ I I I - --- T~'~' ! I I 0 I u I I I ~ ----~4 --- -~~a y- o I I~ ~ I ~-~ ~ j I II /~ ' I I ° K~~ ' I' lop lC I I j (~Yp 1 m i I I ~~ ~ --_ ~ 4 ~ I o ~ - I --- ------J L---=~------=-- I I I I I I ;.; I I I q~ I I j j j I I I I I I ~ I I I I C V I i I I -(, --= L--- ----- R 0 ~ I - - ---- _~ -----_~ I__ ~ C b j ~_ jL.~-I I I I 16~'ITY"P. I - {~ ^ ~ p ~ ~ ~-11TL -rrJ~rr~-r I I - ~ ~ ~ I I I I I °I I I I I ' - ~- ~` j ' bm0' TYP. -~ \ ~ ~ u .~-_ - - I - Ca~.v Fr- ~c ( f I I I 41 I I I I I ~~ I I I I~ I I I Ir- ~~ !~ II I I I I ~I I I I I l' J Q I Ip 1 1 I I 1191 V I I I _ i it i 1 / 4 __ ~~____~~) I _~_ I V I I I r_ i I __~.T___J~ _~~ 8+4` I _ _ \ r$ili i r l 4 1 1 ih~ i i -$` ~~l n ~l ( ~ ~ I ~I I. ~ i 1 1 I I I J a I I -~I I' ~ I I \ I I `o l i I' ~ ( 1 - II II I I ii li l i~ II EXHIBIT A A-4 y ~ 5~~ b ~ j~a e 3 ~ ~'-; yU S't o~ U >8 Z J 0. 0 N V N 8 1 '~^° ~ f jeeze•_ E i~ ci II `i {~I ?C liiiii ?Y C ?c~ 0 ~,3~ ~ ~~~ e f ag 'x SF fif fif i fib i f Uf iff itf;~ift;f if;f~i~;il itltlllf~i 1;!`1;1111 i I IEIEIEIEI IIIIIIIIII lllillllil Illlililfl I ! meeee5 ee ceenge~gp eep:e een nor v eee ~ -- ~-° - ~-- i-~--- e.eaea4r5 eegeege~9' !eP^.,9.9! ...!.S ... . ro vex i f ~~~ _ L; ~ ~~ aa~ o E $~° ~ o a" ~V ge! I e r 0 V ra f.el n q ~.1t i~~ ,@~; ~ 6 8 M1 • • ~r !F~yy Fkkuy C? . ._. ~~? ~~~ ;~ ~~I W N :~ ~~ ;~ !~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ;~ ;S • EXHIBIT B A_5 ~ a x. ~° ~, : ~ ~ c H~ 9` ~~ k~a ~ ~ fA r ~ ~ ~ gnu d ~ p S a~ ~ E~. c ~ u~ ~ o e ~.`a y gg } p l ~ ~~., a ~Y i" t y ~. ~~ ~a ~I N~~ ^aa ~ 3 ~ Ian ~'a ~~ ~ ~ € ~~ ~o~ ° spy ~ ~~~ I ,~ ~ ~~ ~o: .~gfg. .g~ °~~ d F , AE K. %~; a ~37? ~ ® ® ® oo ~N r o 8 8 n Y • 3: ss~ t~€~ 4Y9= ~~~ EXHIBIT C ~ A-6 ~ MMpJp ~~ ~1 ! ~~ ~~~ Q i ~ J - a ~- ~~ ~ ~~ ~. 's 1~~ u~ d ~~ Fo ~3 o~ i~ tic C~ ,F w~ U ~~ 5 =~.~s~~ sazvi>ossv^Q,. I~Id"Id 2I00"I3 ~ ~ ~ ~ s p ~ °~~.; j €~i~i!~ NVW03A 8i ~~a~~s ~e • 1r ~ u • ~' ; ~i .Sir , ~ E~i~~€ ;_ i ~ ar I~i~ :o ~ °'ia! a °~9 iii a~ ?t~ ~f. i ~~~~~ 1 D 'it ~ i r life! ~ i ~~ ipaE ! iii il4ir!€€€ tie€i ~i9,9tr€ii4atf6i>s o ~~®6~~~ A-7 ~~~ 63LVI~OSGtl ~11,~T/~~f~ll ~i iV TV ~~ NtlW03A /lvlll lll lS CIo143.LA~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h e !~ rn q f ~~ w FF c j! V ~~I Q 1 W ? !a 1{S 4 _ N F` ~P PPM ~:tS[~ 'ii F3 il~ ' a~ pp I ~{E~~h~ FF _ _ 9 R f 6c ~i W o l~~~ W o y _ _ W ! _ O 1 ~ _ W i f - ~ W o y ~ol,~6a 0 _ _ ' - _ i .d at c ~ b U 4 O P _ _ _ _ _ - Q W ~ E Q _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - _ _ I y~ y~j FN _ __ Fd __ _ ~ Y Q - ___ - O Q n 4 W ~ __ _ __ __ W }J _ @ N ^ ~ 7 Q S1~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~~ 6 _ _ - _ 6 F V ~V 2 ~ Z _ _ G '~ - i G f _ _ f _ I E:E IS ~ Z ~ <~ w - _ _ _ - _ w ~ h W W Q Q 2 _ _ __' ~ C 2 O - - - J a W _ _ 0 _ _ _ 0 ~ ~ ~ k C - - . j e _ = p 5 2 6 ` O F ~ ~ !.8> of W - - - ~ o00 o00 , , ® w ~ _ . Z ~; Q ! ti sai _ - ~ m ~ - _ °_ _ °_ _ -_ _ ~ f _ z _ _ _ _ - ~ ~ - ' - _ _ ~ ~ - - - - w . _ II I - ^~ ~ t~ u • J A-8 • • • ~ ~+y~3sg CC Y$ 2 ~ ~ 4 ~'`fD: e '~ ~ SI~IOLLHA3"Iff z e a ~~ g~R~ s~Nwwoaei. DI~IIQ'llflg 210I2I3.LX3 ya ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ m Y U LL_ pU P t ~ \ d N ~y ~Q ~~j g 3 ~ Sa. W O Z Q p W { p O F' 6 , w a w - ;~ ~ O iF i u v j P 0 K Q W ¢ u u I u v 3 m a F j J F ZY N N a 6F Q 6 6 Z 2 O O gg S i~ i > > CCC2 w ~ W W ~ o 0 ~'~ ~ i z ~ > > ~~ ~ m m r- r p J ~~~ ~ W ®';~ ~ ~I~ 0 o00 ~ o0o ®®® ®®m W u ?S! o f 60~ m f z ~~ LL . sl !d p !!! ~ e4~ ~ , E L ~~ A-9 /~~g1'~~3 omaw ~i. Sl~lol.l. V A:1~~ / '~}~V F'~3~~ 631VI~O65V ~~~--- r--~Rg ~rvo3A ~is~azina zdoixasxa ~ a 5s ^ 8- Q 2 m ~ ~ ~ a ~ ; 9 04 ~ ~. ~ ~ c : f € J~ 4= . m t _ o 4 r - ..__.__.. .. ~ ~ ! d,i~E€0dili~ ' 3 -- - e ! ! Be~iO FF_ ery o _ _ 9 d Sj F '~ :E q W e 1e id J s = a z a _ _ _ _ _ 6 _ ~E i W p ' _ - _ o d Q ~ ; - -__ v - ~ W E ~ a b _ y dE O 2 ~ _ - - ~ u o - _ - ~ m i _ _ e a W ~ ~ ~ - _ _ z o __ _ FF z o F - = 9 d 9g _ F ~~ ~ ~i f N _ N a b Z 6 Q d~ o - i - - - d z - - -- z _ ~ 0 _ - 0 idtl !! ' ' _ _ _ _ ~ - o m F - - - - ®® - - _ _ - _ - _ ~ _ _ W 9 _ _ = m W ~' o __ __ __ __ __ a_ o ~ - - - ~_ __- _' _- .- J _ W ~ - ~ ~~1 ~ F ~ LL N _ _ _ _ _ Z _ _ W ~ Z G _ W - I ~ - - - ~ _ _ _ _ O ` - - E > _ _ - 00~ o00 - __ -G'= _ __ j~ I~ ® W _ p z - Es3 ° dB' m f z - _ - !9F ° _ _ ¢ _- ° _ - i d1i !~d t ~ , -$ iE) a • u • A~10 • • • ¢ /~^ ~•3^ [~~i riy~4 ~{~'4 O / w rug.. (~j-~'`,`'ff~~g~.R vw onm1 JIVOLLV()3 l~ 3 `~l~~°8f~ s~vl~ossv ^~,i /1 [~ `1 1V~iT VAT p{ I~h~ 8~ NtlW03A ~i. ~/1~~L1~JnQ CI~14:1.LA:1 pg ~~ ? ~ L z ~ Q q °« ;, y ~ L ~ ~ y ~•~3. ~ $1 3 P: N°tl . 6 4 4 ~ s a _ i~ !! o - o U Z '4 p .it' ` S e -' Q _ _ _ N 71' W _ V _ _ + ~ 6 ~l tl i X = I z f~ i~ - - _ - ~ i! a ~! a - Q ~! :I a - _ _ W o W __- o Z ~ Y o 4 - - O ' _ ? m _ _ Q p F W 6 - Z 7 Z ~ _ V V U V IIpp 2 ~ k Z LL e oL - G -_ G -Y W __ _ _ W - _ s Q _ _ N F „ ~1 ~ 6 _ _ a 6 €atl ~9 = ~ - - - = o - _- _ - T- c - Z o o _ _ _ _ . a - - _ _ - _ _ = _ I a - D _ _ _ ! _ _ J J _ U W W 0 ~ - - _ = _ = o - _ _ - _ - 0' - ~ - - -- _-_ _ a _-_ _ s 0 e - - - ~ - _ _ _ _ .. _-= io __= _-_ - - -= m ~ -`==-- _____- m io --- o __= I' ~ - - _ --- ,-_ __ - __ ~ _ _ _ __ --_-__- LL - o. ` _ . _ IE6~ --- - - - --- - ~ - kS 6 4 iPf _ _ ~ = - _ _ 000 _ o00 __ _ _ I = - - g{ _ o _ - - - to _ _ _ ®® a - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ I ~ J _ _ _ _ p[{6 ! Bsi W Z ~ = _ - B c J - _ 7 f m ti _ _ _ -= x - P z ¢ ? _ _ j_ c` ~g ,g ~~ A-11 8 /~//~~/~/~~1I °8~~ l '~ ' saztli~osstl 1V v ld '1~~ (1 ~i ~ 0 `~i 8c8 yy ~~ ~ ~~ ^ . NtlW03A . ~ ~x ~ ~ 3 ~ $ ~' t 5 N Y __ _~ o. m b m W ~ i _I J 'IQ M P b Z Q J 6 0 C A ~~. ~mP P - r I ~ ~ $ ~ A ? A "~ I p S ~ ~ ~t I~ I I J ~n` ~6s~ I l a aQ~ll fBlm G _ ____~_______ I N Z KsB rP1yP 0 K ~- i I A ~ A a ~_ m ~ I ,~ I I I I T ~I?~ a~sP • • A~12 • • o ~ a 5.3 ~'~'~~~ 3~F,~~~ ggg ~ .w. ~ ~ e & '~ ~~ uQu ~d n7u ? z ~ ~ e s~vuossvQ,. I~Ib'"Id 30021 @ € : ~ ~ NVW03A gg ` T ~ 8 ~ y' $ O c " s @s ~Jo 4Y s a 2 s s. a _ __ . - _ - ~.o. q Q W 3~ 3a~ N Q 6 O C * M 9th Kffi ,o. _~ 6 x ~ °' A i -~ d i ~. i ~ i Kn0 i6~ ~ I a v m ~ ~, i a n 0 rc A :dm ~:a - r i ff , A A a ~ °` .ze .ea. i A~13 2 ~"-r~ t~ /~/~[~(~~~~1 ~- ° ~ ~ ~ s~vioossv Q,. 1`It~'Id 2IOOZ3 2I3A10'I ~ chi ~ > £. - gqgyyY ey `yi~~'~ NtlW03A ~ ~ '~ t _ s -4 4 t t - "s ~~ ~.G sJ 7~a N °e°~ 3~3~ 2 ~-¢ n 0 s> ~~~ ~ g~& LL 4 ~ ~7 K w g6 ~ S o ' J SL ~ ~ S~ S S e x. 5 i7 ,.b~ 18ae1 4 f"5 @' a 53 { p€'~ e9)y g( as 1B :a : lz~t€~ {g ¢$ ~t6Y ~i3V eg 1. •~c~~ S al~~aVi e~ ~Y 's i@~g; iii €g ~€ ~~~€{ ° ~i1s~~Cl~ °'~ S~~ '3st t 1 ~~{! ~~~~ ~~S 8~ Ss:iE ~~ &s~~i~f ~~ €[e ~~4 P e P P P Yfl II 1 fpp~~ ~ ; ~gg Ea ~~~ ~~ s; ids p~S plF i ~~ ~:(~:i FC3 ~ .S. S W I rii( .!! f~3 e~P ~{ef 91 ¢`aafiefri ~ §. .. i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 14@ lit 'll~ ¢~sssp?ii~~311~~~F~P~gqa ~ .. ~. ~ ~ e Y ~ Y ~iiH l;f l ~~i ii' u~:Ff 131€;~s a~~3a6 alg ~ s~ ~ I ~~l f I r&~3~1f ; ~ii:ii ® ® o m©m ®m ®mm ~ t 4 td~ ~ 4ri ~g sl~{. ~ F ~ EBSg~~n f~ Itid4' i ~ F i~sy~ ~ I g ~~~1$~s ~ it°;I" 1, ~ P~f ill l 41 .d @al~~ ~ I ff6 ~ ~ lle l~i~i X111 ! 9 Fp SY ~i ~~@ 6 S F ~ ~~.L..~.,1 ~,{~i ~ a ' S~~l Y~ rlntit''IIf !i ~ '€ 1°af I {~ F ~ d 3 €~ r a t ss t8 55~t ¢g 3I{p{gti~Y ~ ...~i,.. ~f 5cyfyd~~ ~ IYVN 1i. ~i li ~q5f{ ~~~lli3~P S3 ~E ~~ +g]s s { 3i a'8 V 96FP4P ~ +d~1PSlfI ~ ii iiii i i fo-c~3ofo-om'o-om'o-foommoo'oo %: 93 A51 i 4 : ® '~i ~ m ~ , I A~ ~ ~ ~i ,ll~ li ~ ~ % 4 i° -&~ ~ 4 I a ~ I 9 0 .O O. . •I;ep •~'e~ ii ~ p i ~~ ~ I f i B .~ O ~~ i F a Jd i =:_y ` o ' m ~ A ~S ~6 , ® § f~ 94 $ mR a ip __ _ m ~ . - 6f1~ !ee I I t ~i {i ii ii 1. ii ii t !i ee Y Ff 1f 1 ~ ~ t r r; ~. . .. .. ., y. + ~ ~: 'A SS SF y k S SS s: ;; ¢ II # Sa Y li.i .e .: ~ $ ,F ~ 1F ri :f 11 A al '1 t t ~ f p a l l d : a v f ``s !? ! i' l i Ii d i 4 i2 .( Ff 6 ~1 ci 1 ~f f F gi ! fll~ "31 ;! f ' I! t f f I :{e CP ~ ,~ v h ~,l 11 f u N 11 {Y 1 ~Y :i f~i ~ 3 { ~ f 8~ { 1' {I{ 1 11l 1 f ~* O P P S? P I'f 1'( ij fl if ~ e i1f 1 ~ J Sf FI ZI S. : 11 111. ¢, S. x. si FV nl a J • • A-14 • • • ~ ~ `~~ s31vr.~ossv Q,. I~Ib"1d 2IOOZ3 2I3ddf1 ^ z e a ~ ~ a ci i ~))$ yy C3 J, ~F ;J 2rIl` NVW03A ~Y ~ ~ G 4 ~ 6 _e.r...~.~..~.~...~...r_...__...__.r...e..~...~...~..~_.ro.-- Q t ~~ ~ ~G J --_ ~ he } ice, i s lea~I s :~ I ~: ~ ~° S" s @E o w ~o ~ i ~ d o ; ~y ' i4 ~ i ~~ u y 2d e g 4 _ _ iS ~i u ~ ~~ H ~ e r__ ~~ ~. --_ __-I ---, 5~ 4 -~ _ 'iii '!S¢~ __ I -.-, i--; I I - Ijo. I ~ y. 5> d O Isa sc ~ I I r I I ,..._ _-- ---I_-_-J ~~ I ~ ~ ~~ E y g~.e E~gge °~Y ~ 6 i@a:ys ? 5 ~g°~ a€ z iyp' E ~9a! ~tp ~`t ~p _ 1:~Q1. as 8g ~~ ~~~1 isf~8 i§t iF ~f etG as ~9SE9a~ lT i~a SaE P ~ ~ a - ~ ' ~ 10{ ~i ~, 0 1. ~F ~i£ 4 W 111 ~ .: ~ ~ais~i 6 ~.. ~ ~ i ~ ~:.~ ~ ~~~ .r 1 1111! ~,;3~9 ~ 1qqg P ; §e~s iii i j;~i~~ o~~m` ,q Eyg~g @ ~€Jr~Ei ~ I Plil ¢ ~, a 8~ ett§- ~ Ei~;~94a (~ Iji~~~l §S e vs iiii; g~: ~ ~P ! ~,';q~~E a i"~~iii~iii S! i~ a 3 g 4 € ~ - ~€t~4 ~~ s 4~~as°~ a ~l!~(I ~!; Ii li ! e ¢ a P ~ ~ ~ ,: @'~3 g ~ € i9pp!! ~ lotil)1 fl( ! pp~ j°E@ kktpt~ s ~ qg~a 33i tg ~,, § E~ a~ ~lllllii!~i li isfa~i~~i.FP~~ ~ Mel-. ~ 9 •~~~ 96~~€€ - v~. °a~~ia! ~ ei iiii ~ i omooos oo~s 11 : :: ~ : .. :: ~ ~ :f S :4 .1 il p M ~ p 3 rt A P 3 e~ td V t~ :: ~ t" :i n p: . .. n ~~ ' 1 'ss is s3 i3 ss .i 3i ^. 't's 33 iE ~ s3 !I . .E b 6 € e9 d S iQ is y` :f fa f i 1 i f i 1 i 1i d 1f 8 3!!,, 'y i 111 't0t .f : i 3 3. i! 3 r. p i ~i 1 1 ~ ~i 1 p ; s i ; ~~ ~~ lld rs l i , i ~ ~ ~ 11 b ~ i~ N r! b 1a ll 11 1 ~: It 1 3f 1•( ! li 1 I. l ~ !i 4 YE !i P• l 3• lFi p.l f` '~ ~4 k ` E~a 6 1 SI of Sf i~ 3~ SFf ; 511' ;. 1~ i~ 1~ A S Sf3 I 531 1 3:1 d - A-15 ,. ®+~. [~A~~T i~[J ~T~f~,T Z ~'.- aw ~a~ua.'....vn O '"~_. ~`5~ ~~ ~~ Sl`L~L1.V /1:11:1 '-""~~~ S31VI~OSStl (l~tT/T~fT ll Ci V i~T!~T VAT o ~ e f~ ~p NVW03A ~i. /1V1U Lll 1(1 LL~l U:1J..A:1 ~^ ~ ~ ~ a ~ c 2 2 A ~aa ~ k m ~ V ~ g 3a 9 1 ~3, S : i m 4 __._.. a . - n " m .- _ _.._..e.~..... o ~ v p , f f a - a ~ J ~ J = _ = ; N ~ - N Q ~ ;'~ y 6 Z 2 O _ _ O 3e ~ _ - J W A ~C ~ W W z 6 00o 00o O n i i 0 0 J ' J 0 _ 7 0 f S f -_ _ __ -_ n :P' J ~ p~ __ - aW dl J 3 " pp ~~ ~.4p6 f O ~ i ° vE ~4 7~ s a R2 ~~~~ } ~ a _-" - 90~ r _ yyy § s.3Yp ~ '- ~_ N _ N _ _ _ _ fy ~ ~e - - O O 99 55pp 44 a _ _- W - - W 9 § E PIPB~F G - _ - tl Z _` n Z pig - pE J - f J W _ _ i_° o _ m E` Z _ - - o _____ m _ _ __ Q ~ d ~, p! ~~ ~s J 3 ~f' gF~ LL " F W - ~ 0 ;{E :E o • • A-16 • L J • gg -°' °~.~' suol.I.dns-Ia @ gg ~:~>~~~ sazNVwo"~ 'JI~IIQ'Ilflfl 2IOI2I3,LX3 ~ ~ 2 a ; ° ~ ° ° a _..Y...___._._..~..~....--" ---...__ _ .~.. .Y ..4.~ m 4 o e o~ z zs a d ~ ~ f W a u a w w N a 6 6 Z ~ Q H 1 H 1 W W 00o a a 00o u u z 0 LL~~ z 0 ~ m ~ m ~ _ ~ z u w z ? ii 1 ~~ ~ ~ o i a u ~" Of h Ea ~ ~,g ;t~i: 3 ~ 3~3 2 ~ ~ g s 's 3~~g esi o LL u ® ~ ~ ~ ~ m 14-u~.yi (-~ . , P ~_ ~~ ® ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ a C ~ 4a t ~ s°~ ~ ® ~ ~ . : , o ~ N N ~i ~ a J ~ ss ®®® ®®® 6 ~ 6 O a ~ g:gq~3~ ~ a a f'F ~F~ w w f~ a w 9 W ~ W e o ~k Z €4e O Z O W yg J q ~ $ m m F~ ~ It t& 3s c 5 LL 883 !,i ~ LL W _ ~ ~ IL{J1~~1 ,, a o AE IE A~17 ~ ~ ~~ ;-. .o: ®, srloi.I.dna~a ~/,7~~/~/aP~1 ~ ~ s~tl~o~tl ~~~ jm~g~ Ntlrv03A 'JNIQ"flflfl NOI~IH.LX3 ~ p '~J/~ ~~ ? ~ t ~ ~ ° ~ ' ,: ~ ~ 5 a~ ~ ~ °' a `~ c g : n 4 -- - - - ~~ m - - 4 - - - - '_._ o---- - - P - ~ 0 i 0 - - F F m N N - - N J n n Z _ o - ~ 2 o ooP~ }ry-~y~~ or=o ~I _ ~~ i~a'i _ o e - - - _' ~ m ~ m - - II - - ~ o _ LL w ¢ ~ B' . '~ ~I, , ~ $~~ u;it~ ~~ < u q a .~ ~~ @! ~ ~ g~ i - - _- _ _ _ _ a ~ _ la _ - _ :' ~ _ _ _ z ~ z _ F [ I~ ~ ~ ~ ' J F < _ yy FN ~ N 3 i~vP1~ ppp pP i ~ ~ ~U~~ F O a = ~ e = _ - - - - 9~ - ~ - _ _ ---- ~ .. _ _ _ _ ~a _ _ _ d d ` e - 1 ~ - ®® ~ - - - - f ~ Jr [ I 9fr LL ~0 a _ -E~ - ® _ ® ~ ; - - ~ - - W w _ °_ - °_- m m 'a P - _ Pa ~ ~P~ ~'3 ;rI ~ ~ W 5 g a46 i o • • A~18 I • • d .iy.3~~ K $335 gg r3:8gig~~ ..e.. _ SI~IOlLt~AH'IH ^A~T ~rTll ~a ~t t v 631 NVW 3A ~i. /lvl4 1113Q U~1~3.~.A~ s ' z z ' ' " ~ °-'y !°s 3 € :, ~ p o 3, ems, -" - ------- -~.. - w o 4 P Z uU_a Z U_ C C: ~ f F ^ e Y -- ~1 2 J O u 2 J O u w w I~ rv n fI ~ 1 < - Q _ 6 6 000 Z O W J W ~~ff ~ Z O j W O O ~ ~ ~ _ O J - J ~ ~ _ _ _ w _ w _ ~ V `~ f C Q~ J 4 ~] ~ ~ gS i~~E i3="~ ` 3 $ a - ~ € ~~#~` o z Q O P P t 33 € @tl T ~ ~ _ _ _ - _ _ °q ~ O _ _ _ r O ~~~~~3 E e31 3 ~i p c ^ ~ ~ I ¢ ¢ w . _ ~ _ P __ _ _ __ _ _ 0 ~~ fff O _ _ _ O U U "~ y 3 J ~ ~' - -_ __ p ~ _ _ - ;° ~E o ~ ~ IO _ _ Q; ~ -- N LL ~Q Z 6 Z 6 .r a I - - _ - - ®~ z - - __ - _ ~ ~ 9t1 > , F 'i' ' J d o - - _ _ o .Q 3 W ~ ~ 9 a 0 - W - _ _ - W J W _ _ __ - Z _ ~ _ Z w pP it,€ 1aa Y W ' _ _ ~ ` - 0 J - - - IE~Y ®® { EQ 11 77Q C'' QQi u ~~~ !E !aE la F - ~~i 3 IIF 6 ~ C F~~ :e Q~ ~i w c °¢ iE ~ @ z ~ A-19 {~(j]1 ((~~ {~ P h ... ~~~6"` wr.u ~rvm IIQ11~ 11V 11 ~ } ~ ~ n5~_IG g v_~g~5~ sazN~vwoax~,. hIV"Id 30021 ° ~ ~ ~% ~ s @~ ,v~~~~ k9 a 5 ~ ~ ~ '~ a - __ _ _ _ __ -_ rq. m m w -..-- _________ .{ I n ~I I ~ III a A ~! II I i // I S II I II I II I ~~ II I ~'B !~ II I ___=i~,F.==~~1 _ _ _~ I ~ ~ ICI I _ i I~ ; II ~~ ~ I %/_ _ II _^ ~I I I ~ _xl~ _T{5!P ~t IA°a ~ I~ pl l II ~ i II i ~ _ I' ____ ~, IJ~I I O 1~-ter=Jt I L~- -~J r - y Q m J _ ~ I lI a ~I I A III a IIII ~° ~B j~ A II I p p rc Y ___9__I~. ~{ \~ ~ II I ~P~ ~~ II I i ~ II I ~~ IF-~ ~ ----yIG-F =-i I _ ____ /~-,I -- 11 I e ~ li _ II I _ ~ I~ _ I ~~ j ~ jl I L I I --- 1~-~~=J°--=J I -- p L~ =~J r J L _J • • A-20 • 0 4~a ",.~. .~.~~ uQu ~ u7u ? p C ~ "° "r z ~ .,,.,,a.,..,...... ~~ R > a ~; ~~ s~.v~ossv Q,. 1~1~~1d d002I e - ~ " ~ qp NVW03A 33 § w ~ C 4 i5 ~J^~Y~ $~9 ~ S S } ~ ~ t a ~~ / ~ m /i i~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ ~~ ~ ~3@ 3vm p 9 ~ /~ - 7~ ,C - ~I ~ {H~ i / _ ~ qa.m / ~ //g .~ ~ / 0 ~\ ~6Y0 ~j ~~ii -~ 'L--= ~J r------~ L _ - - J • • A ~21 a - _ ~ n n § ' k N ~ ~` ~ ~ 531,,~~os,e .~ I~It/'Id 2I00'I3 2I3M0'I ? ~ ~ : ; a' "~ s !a FJ^~4~ NVW03A ~i. ~~ ? ~ a ayl $ B ~ n ___. - t ~~ ? } I -- o ~ Y -~ s _- - ~ ~ - & ~~ ~ , ~. r~, ~ ~ ii ~ ~C Qa ~° i ~ ~ i -- - • • A-22 ~ z 9~ ~~~`~~ sazoi~ossv Q,. NV'Td 2100'Id 21~ddf1 ^ 2 ~ ~ o ~ ~> "~'' 4 FS IJ^~~` NVW03A ty ~ 'g S - ~ I ~ I , r,._ ~ '~ ' C. ~~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ .S .g I I , ~ a6 ~. i i yz .a ~ 3 I ~ qy S, ~ I : ~ 1________ ~ ~ 7i £ ~ ~ ~ e ~ l • u ~ j asa ae- c~ ~i y r #c • • A ~23 ZO -j 3Rg. , a ® JIVOLL V A`I l:1 > d e ~ ~5~ ~o~..e ~i. /~~i l1~TT fl (~ ` ' V ~ f T V ~ u i -1.°f ~_ s31bI~OSSb /1V1\3 III1Q UOJ U:I.LA~ ^,$®p9$x NV4N03A £ a J^~3'S 2 ~ ~ a c 6 3 I ~ y ^ ~ ~~ d 1~ ~ ~ r ~ y E AA 4~ 6 ga ~ ~ __ _. m ~' } _ . . _. __ .. _ _ _.. __.. __. O § ` ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ Q C _ • ~ ~ W Z G _ ~ _ _ _ ~ W Q 6 6 O O I J11 W O 2 O Z _ _ - ~ (} = ma . I ' -~ - _ _ _ m - - - ~ I ' ~ ~ y ' l~ m ~ . I - _ _ lu J C f ' o00 ` - - o00 _ _ _ - _ ~ , .E;1`a as f _ _ _ W O II ~ c~ c [ L ~' le {$ 4 Z 4 r Q q O ~ 4 F . .. % O ~~ _ _ _ ~ f f u 9pp ' = a W I a j Q ~ q~~°-~t!='~ ~ 4F F~e ~~l~~~ a C ~ 01 _ ~ y ~ ~ N =sr _ ®® ® ~ n 4 LL e a 6 i i ~ J ~ ~ } Q ~~ x0 W W n4 y ~~E ~ O _ Z Z O 1€ - _ _ m p[ f 2 3 ~'® ~~4 ~4~ ~ a s [~6 ,. G _ _ 0 Q ~ al C ~ 9 ~ S ; ~' 3€ E' ' ~ Z ~ ~ W 4 ..1 W o • ~~ u a-za • • '~~ z" ~ m o ~rr~SK ~^° SI~IOlLt~A37fl 5 iy~ ~:~p~~ 631NV'w°o~a" ~ ONIQ'IIfIB 2I012I~.LX3 ~p ~ ~ ~ ,• SY ? ~ ~ z " ~ ~ e 2 ° ~ ~ ~ y> ~ Y 3 is J^ Y 8 t . m ..__..-~~..-..v--.._..,.__....._..._..~...~~.. ~.... ~. -..~ ... ~~ .r .~...~ fp Y D S u Z u 33 gg ~ 2 _ d ® pp 17 ~ ~ o^ Q u w ~ w ® ® ' N ~ l if I~~IJI J 6 Z a 6 Z 2 ~ O O . > W > W ® W l Y o z n z o ~ v ~ I .. m ~ m ~~ ' L-=~ Z F O_ u W 00~ 000 c p~ , F ~ s ~~ Z L .. ~ ~ e J Q 4 n 4 jt ~ 1 a u W . E O ~~ o e ~~ U U J a W m s16P SRR ~Fel~^A W ~ W J ~ S O ®®® ®® A y P 9 !t8 n > ~( ~_ s E~ YI ~ ~ E ~ F ~ ~!~ w eE w ~ 'i C R m w u o e Z (kE~ O ~ Z O ~ e W e :;11 @+•E m 'm l i; t ~' ~ R !1 0 e , ~ W a A-25 i S '/~`(^~J~{~§§~17I(!. SYd; s~daossv ~i ~(~dQ~~g ~oI~~ZX~ ! ~~ i § e `yl ~, gg NtlW03A . ~ ___......_.._____..._....~...,._.. __.Y...__~ ._ -. __ _._. .r_,.'_ m y c 4 O _ O f _ _ ~ q9- _ _ F _ ~, ~ O W __ ~ W J „ ~ J N Q 6 ~ 6 7 ® ~ W W O Z a I J 0 F S O m f W p ~ - - oo°o f _ _ _ - 90~~ - - . E ~ ~ c _ _ _ E a ¢ w 4 - _ _ - __ - _ - _ - o - o ice. p - _ _ - - - = - - s ,, _ ~ _ _ ~ i 'se je a~idv3~~ w _ - - _ _ ~ - - _ - - YF~ _ -_ - ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~uiQ Py o _ _ ® ® ® ~1 _ _ _ LL v _ ~ ? Q - - - Q ~ ~~ td ' _ ~i ! ® 6 y ~ ' 3 _ L ® ~ W ® ~ j W ' t€ I y e G _ W - d 1 _ v o _ ® z ~ z W I m ~ m F~ t°t 1€ EId !1 EI {e r e; EP '1 d;~ '~ 1 o z o ~ l? ~ ~ i :i T ; s F F v Ba a! ~ • • A~26 • • L. J '.JTAY. J• yq~ s~.dioossd l~~i ~I 1~l CI `r V^( aW } ~: "`yyyJJl J°9~ NVW03A /IV~V~II:U ~o~C13.R.A:I ffi {p ~ ~ 2 ~ 8 tl y3 E d M ~ E _ _ m p _ _ _ V ._.. - o.._. ._ _ __ _ _ __ 4 ~ O O _ o u ~ N _ _ _ _ _ ~ u N _- n _ A 6 J 6 J O O W J ~ W O O O O ~ ;~ E m ~ b S LL V. W ~- i~ . J W _ OHO 000 ° - ~ _ -G _ _ I ~ d IIILALALA ~ eL ~ ~ Z 4 6 'q 3_. P o e~~4i' _ e. iR i O ~ p - - - ~ ~ ~ ~RlNRfE qa Leo ~ a W O _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ W V ~ y E ~ _ LL } J ~~ ~- ~ - _ ~_ ~ ~_ ~ ~ -- - _ - Z ~ U _ I I 7 ~ ~ /g R Q f C - - - O II u i S _ _ _ - 9 e~ ~ ® W _ _ __ __ J LL i€ - i ~ R n ? S f - ~ aE6 ~ W ~_- _ - - _ - _- _ _ _ ~ W ~ 6R ~ i ~ _ _ z - - - ~ _- z W _ -_ o - _ _ _ ~ o € RR! _ _ _ ~ ~ m ' ~ ~e - m _ E3 6! ~ _ _ - ~ t99 l1 _ W a'R is w z- o c rc g rc i° o Y A~27 0 99 fix s ~ Sl`IOI.I.I~A~"~3 ~~=_~ ~ € iE '~ ~~~ S~NVW 3A ,. DI~IIQ1lIlfl 2IOI21'3.I.XH ~~ .__...____. p~ 2 2 .~ ~ a~ z~ - ~ ~ . - '~, ~~ e i, -- m ... .._. . o 4 ~ V Q - - - ~~~ ° _ _' _ _ n 2 _ _ ~ J p _ ( a 6 I Z _ - ~ O t II ~ ~ 0 ~ =n = - ~ m _ _ _ ~ ~ a x . - - - - ~ z o m - ~ - - - - ~ ~. z o m - _ _ _ ~ , F - F W _ _ _ O C = _ _ o00 o00 _ _ ~ ~ - u, _ _ . `f ~ . _ _ ~ _ _ ~~ a ~ q . - E - ~Q ~ - _ ~ _ ~ F ~ ~ ~ f u ~ _ - - a W N W 'J' N ®® n n _ __ Q Q _ J 6 6 ~ ~B ~3I ~ W W W W b V Z _ 2 ~ o J +€ - - I 5 m - 5 m rc ~ ~sS [31 ~F o 4 _ w ie8 ~~ 8 ~sl rc iti ~ a a • J • A-28 • J r~y.3~ ..~i.o.~ a ~ y n ~ y ~~~ ~~& 631tlI00SSV f^1~~ii //~~ ^^ ~i TV ^~T Vhf ° 6 4 ' Y ~ $y ~,y'(~~$ NVW03A ~i. /1`LJll~lll~ ClO1G1:1.LA:1 4p i3. iy ya 4 P6 U°N~~ 51 L C u~ G~ ~. E } 4 3s u ®9 ~ ~ ~~ ®H m m ~ ~ n ~ < 6 6 1 1 W W J W W Z Z ~' ~ 0 0 H f Z LL u W 000 000 u q ... v R2 ~EC a ~, S 2 u ~ m m W ~ ®®® ~ ~ ®®® ~ x n n Z Z Epp < ~ P !~E n a ~e~ aEE j a 9 ~ W W u o €t!~ S c i:'~ o ~ m m 99f ~ ¢ 3 i~ ~ s ~ W ~I p K ~ C A~29 6 "ry•~~; ~....i ro.°~~'~~~~Q,~ SI~IOI.L'dA~"I~ ~ V ~"'' ~~i ~ s~vl~ossv ^~T ~t~(~(~({ ~r $ I~•`gu ~ NVW03A /1V~\1 Lll ~Q ~~I~~.I.X3 ~ ^ i ~ ~ ~ k ` g~ t,} g i@ d~ a~! ~ $ "' M ~ n 4~ P e o V^ ._..__. m 4 -... .._. o v - _ ~ ® Q O = - _ _ ..-...v Q-Q O - _ F - FI - ~ N ~~ N _ _ n Z G 6 / ~ Z Q 6 Z O O > > w w w O Z O w O Z O J J 0 M _ 7 0 f O t _ w ~® ~ - ®® - o00 - ®®® ° - - - IIP n I tt =L e oL _ Y u - - - - - - ~~m z o - - Z 0 _ _ - - - ~ - - ~ _ _ _ _ ® ~ - - ~ Y - - _ --_ - - j j - - - ® K c x _ _ _ n J 6 6 IY ~ ® w _ w Z _ O _ _ _ _ O J_ _ r• 3 m - ~ m • • A30 • I 4~35~ mmax J1VOI~V~~~:1 yy l~~,T l( ~i~T ~f y S~NIWWO7A ~i. /1~lIQ~IIIICI ZIOI 4:I.LX:1 ~~ @~ 7 2 m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~~~~ C'J d €~ l.ra } '~ 2 0 g ~ ~ h _....._.....~..~...._.~..~...~ W _... ._~_~_..~~,..~.._.._..___._...~_._.eq.`_ O 4 Z ~ W Z U = _ _ _ __ o o _ - ~ _`_ _-- - _ - _ o _ _ v u c '__' Q P __-- - ~ n _ 6 J 6 J p O /~ ~~- 1 Q W Q ' J W 1 11 W W Z O J ~ Z O 7 I _ ~ O E _ 0 ~ LL ~ _ W _ _ C - - 000 ` o00 ~' ` _ ~ x _ c - y= r_~ _ _ • ° __ _ - _ _ _ _ ~ ~ z Q U ° 5 P , ~ ~ P e ~ ~0~ ~ - - - ~ x x U - - - U / ~ K Z - 1 Z _ _ _ _ _ _ J _ _ / O _ ~ -_ _ _ _ lq ~ . W _ - _ _ _~ _ -_ J ~ _ c c - EQ _ - __ __ p ! ~ - - a J ~ 2E W - _ ~_ - ~ ~ m - W C _ ti ~_ - - J W O _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ ~ _ J = a __ A-31 o ~~6~ a ~•i"°p4~ 4 ~6 J°~Yc ugu ~ udu 2 ~ ~ ~ k s~.dloossd NVW03A 1V V 1C1 ,1OOU ~$ S L ~ 4~ 84 ~ L ~ ¢ ' 3, ~. L ~~.. m 5 0 m - ~ p Wyy F ~ ~________ _ _ _~ - -I _~ ,I I N . a ~ 9 ~= I, ~ i ~ a o I I vfi~ ~I I °~ F I ~r=- A 'II I -----___- _ II I ~~ I III, I III ~ ~ I I I ~ `f~, I I 1 a b E ~~ I ' I III ~ , ~ ~ m s~ 13p@III I III ~ _ _ Y III ~ IIII I ) ___ _____ _ _____ ___ ~ I y i ~ ~° MM ' VIII Illli I ~ I IIII I III J I / v1 vB ~ I a --- m , ea.e •~a =_~ I I II I a d I III nfi II I ~ 0 K ~ _ I (r III III __________ b I I III III I II III ~_ II I m I III I II II ~ II I II II __ II I II _ n.m I __ ~ ____ a I I ~ `_ ~I I I II III I ~I I ~ ~ III I I II I L-- ~ '~ CI I ---------~ _ Jj I L_ -~ • • • A32 • • • m ~ ~ -~;~~~ g@55 gg -'" S ttg ~ ~ ~~ s~vl~ossv "vwo~A ~,. I1H"Id 30021 ' „~ m n € ~~ ~ ' N r ~ :or ~ s 8: Ci~~9 ~~ e z ~ $ 7 t __.__..-_~_._.,.._...~..-.._.._-_r...~__. ____ -_- __ _4.__ m c w Kt3P C _-_-- ~ I I I ___________. ~ II a eEYO II I i II I II I c ~ ~ Ir== ---- ,. ===_____- ~`1~~ ' I II `q` J I m I II I II I II ty e ~ ~ ~'B '6~ I~ I I~I ~~ III `. I I II I II I II I II I _ ~ ~, ~ ~3Y F IL-- _ _ -- ____ -------- - I---- a 9 I I --------- a u w 0=93@ ? - - 1 -~ I I I yJ F % s III I d I I III ~o II I III o ~ ~ I r== -==______ ~ II I I III I II I II ~`z~, ~ ~+a ~.P .Pm - I I JI I I II B 6 ~ . ~ Iii I II -- A --~------- - -------`--; „- III III I II I II _ ~ b'~ kv ~~ g III IL iv I -- __ ____ --------_ - L 9~ I I I: I 3{ A-33 ,Y ~ • I • E/s^ ^I V' ^ i~ Z133HS 33S s ~ y s~ a ~ {{ 8 ~ ~ ~ " 5 ~g"a_4 0 0 ~ ~a~ ~g~& Y y U ~'a° a~~ a O U ~~ e e ® b Z h W m Q W O U O v ~; U2 ~V 0~ 4yF4g 3~ a 0~ =i p[ p4 P n~ A~ fUf~ ~2 A34 E ~~ sP t~~ 0 ~ ~ 5~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ V n & ~ o ~'-~ °y6 ° 'v ~ gy y a$a~ 2 ~ @ ti U „~ N V v 1133HS33S A35 W h Q V Q W O U e, UZ Cj Oti i~ ~u e i~ r[ u P ~F wg yyU~ 1.2 • 8 a: ~~ • • • Y133HS 33S ~seg Y ~ as gg, 2 ~ 0 6 ~ 4 ~ ~ '~'"s F ~~ - k K hU ~:?s ~ p sg~ L s8 ~ U a e 0. Q V W U 1' V V e, u2 <j 0~ gF~ 3 0 i~ e~ce ~F ~~ o~ ~2 A36 E133HS 33S R ~y YS <a~ ~ p5p~~ °R y^~j <.`~. 9p V S~ ~ ~ p' C ~ ~~fi g ~'1 4 \ ~ o ~'g O ~ ~1~ e°& a~~ u ~~' ~ ~ U o „ o ^ L ® O v • • A37 4 V W O v (j UZ <~j 0~ F~ t v° a Obi ij ~c ~V n4 ti~ (U ~2 u • .August 25, 2008 Crestwood Corporation BUILDERS -LAND DEVELOPERS Tabe van de Zwagg, Associated Planner Community Development Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Neighborhood meeting for Tract 17919 Mr. van der Zwagg A netghborhood meeting was conducted on August 11, 2008. The meeting took place in the evening at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, Rancho Cucamonga, California. All 261 residents and property owners within 600' of the tract were invited to the meeting. Invitation letters were sent along with at site plan of the proposed project. The letter gave a brief description of the proposed development. Both the neighborhood meeting invitation letter and site plan were posted to the project notice of filing signs 3 weeks prior to the meeting. These signs are located on both Miller and East Avenues. Of the 261 residents and property owners invited to the meeting, only 2 families attended. Jeannie Bowhay came with Michael & Cazlie Hale who resides at 13288 Miller Avenue as well as Ron & Eileen Moen who live at 13256 River Oak Drive. Carlie and Michael live in the existing home located at the comer of Miller and East Avenue, which is owned by her mother Jeatmie. Mrs. Bowhay and the Hales attended the meeting to view the architectwal floor plats and elevation proposed for the project. They had no concerns and were looking forwazd to the proposed improvements to being built around their residence. Unfortunately, the Moen's had expressed their concern in regards to a 2 story home proposed directly behind their property on lot 8 of tract 17919. Since there is an existing 2 story home west of their property, they expressed their wish not to have another two story home built to the south. They were concerned with the potential lack of privacy because both neighbors would be able to look into their back yazd from the second story windows. Upon discussion of the Moen's concems with ow project planner and members of the planning commission, a resolution has been recommended to accommodate the existing homeowner's request. As suggested, we will process a lot line adjustment, which will move the property line between lots 8 &9 five feet to the south. With the lot line adjustment, a single story homes can be constricted on lot 8 adjacent to the Moen's property, while meeting all the setbacks and lot coverage requirements for this development. There were no other concems or questions generated from the neighborhood meeting. Please fccl free to contact ow office with any question regarding this report, Sincerely, J • ~atrick J. Diaz [_ Crestwood Commumties 510 West Citrus Edge Street, Glendora, California 91740 Off: (626) 914-1943 Fax: (626) 335-9320 www. crestwoodcom m u n ities.co m EXHIBIT F A-38 i DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:50 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag August 19, 2008 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES - A request for architectural review of 50 single-family residential homes on 9.85 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04, and 06. On August 9, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Site Characteristics: The site is located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue and slopes gently from north to south. The subdivision of the 9.95-acre site into 50 residential lots was approved on August 9, 2006 (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919). There is an existing house on the corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue which is not part of this development and will remain in place, but whose access will move from Miller Avenue to a new street within the proposed project. The site will take access off of two existing streets, Firestone Drive and Morning Crest Place. There is existing residential development to the north, south, and west and there is an existing church to the east of the project site, across East Avenue. • Project Overview: The applicant proposes constructing 50 single-family dwelling units on-site. The proposed density of the project will be approximately 5 dwelling units per acre, which is in the lower range of the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The project consists of three floor plans ranging in size from 2,527 to 3,527 square feet. The project will have 13 single-story units and 37 two-story units. Plan 1 is a single-story unit and Plans 2 and 3 are two-story units. Each plan will have four different elevations. Plan 3 will have a garage located at the rear of the house accessible by a driveway that will run along the side of the house. Plan 3 will also have an option available for additional rooms above the garage. The project was designed to conform to the development requirements outlined in the Development Code for the Low-Medium Development District, including lot dimensions, building setbacks, lot coverage, and building heights. Staff Comments: Staff is pleased with the progress that the project has made. Each model incorporates multiple design elements of the architectural styles which it is meant to represent (Craftsman, California Ranch, Traditional, and Country French). The roof and wall planes of each model have multiple articulations and decorative elements that have been carried around to all elevations. These elements include the use of wood, rock and brick veneers, architectural window surrounds, and decorative garage and entry doors. Each model will include a front porch that will have a 6-foot deep seating area. There will be sufficient variation in the front setbacks and the plotting of the different house plans to provide a visually interesting street scene. The overall effect is a group of houses that compliment each other and fit well into their surroundings. Major Issues: There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Staff has requested that the applicant make several changes to the plans submitted to the Planning Department on July 31, 2008. The applicant has informed staff that they will make all the requested changes with the full submittal package. If the requested changes are not made, staff will present the unresolved issues to the Committee on the night of the meeting. E/~I 0'B'T l~ A-39 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES August 19, 2008 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the project with consideration given to any unresolved issues. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag The Committee recommended that the applicant make the following changes to the project and for staff to schedule the project for Planning Commission review once the changes are made: Re-orient the project so that the driveways for Model 3 are not adjacent to each other on neighboring lots. 2. Eliminate the use of the "Hollywood" driveway and entrance gates on Model 3. i 3. Replace the two-story model on Lot 8 with a single-story (this change will require a Variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 15 feet total to 10 feet, which the Committee found acceptable in order to increase the building separation from the existing property owners to the • north). 4. Use horizontal wood siding on Model 1 B instead of the current vertical wood siding. 5. Carry the columns and roof overhang on Model 3B across the entire front elevation as on Model 3A. Enlarge the living room window and add a pot shelf under the window. A 40 • RESOLUTION NO. b8-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2008-00143, A. REQUEST FOR ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 50 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON 9.85 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLER AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-081-03, 04 AND 06. A. Recitals. 1. Crestwood Communities filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2008-00143, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue; and b. The 9.85-acre site is comprised of three parcels and slopes gently from north to south; and c. The subdivision of the site into 50 residential lots was approved on August 9, 2006, (SUBTT17919); and d. There is an existing house on the corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue which is not part of this development and will remain in place but whose access will be moved from Miller Avenue to a new street within the proposed project; and e. .The site will take access off of two existing streets, Firestone Drive and • Morning Crest Place; and f. There is an existing residential development to the north, south, and west of the site and an existing church to the east across East Avenue in the City of Fontana; and A-41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES September 24, 2008 • Page 2 g. The project will consist of three floor plans ranging in size from 2,527 to 3,527 square feet; and h. The project will have 13 single-story units and 37 two-story units; and i. The project was designed to conform to all the development requirements outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Low-Medium Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above. this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The proposed design or improvements are consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and • e. The project is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 9, 2006, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In that the applicant proposes building 50 single-family residences on the previously approved 50-lot Tentative Tract Map and only proposes a minor Lot Line Adjustment to the previously approved map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or A ~42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES • September 24, 2008 Page 3 more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. In that the previously approved lots are surrounded by existing single-family residential development and the proposed residences meet all development criteria outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2008-00143. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the design of the homes fora 50-lot subdivision located at the northwest 'corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04 and 06. • 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 shall apply. 3) The installation of all stone veneers requires 1/2-inch mortared joints. 4) All perimeter walls and walls exposed to public view shall be decorative. The perimeter walls fronting Miller and East Avenues shall adhere to the approved wall design and materials palette approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Engineering Department 1) Local depression at catch basin(s) shall not interfere with residential drive approaches. 2) If Lot Line Adjustment 660 and related rights-of-way have not recorded at the time of this application approval, dedicate additional right-of-way on Miller Avenue to achieve a total of 44 feet measured from centerline of the street. This dedication is intended to extend across Not-A-Part (NAP) parcel. a) The existing driveway(s) on the NAP property on Miller Avenue need to be removed and new driveway access installed to the interior tract street. • 3) Install all public improvements per Drawing Numbers 2200, 2200-D and 2200-L. A-03 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES September 24, 2008 Page 4 4) The site is located within Area 8 (modified) of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Development within the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Area is responsible for the City's adopted drainage fee (master plan and regional) as well as reimbursement to other development, or the City, for over sizing of local drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer. City fees shall be paid prior to final map approval. a) For the portion of Drainage Areas 8 and 9 south of Base Line Road, the Master Plan drainage fee is currently $28,800 per net acre, but subject to annual adjustment. b) For Drainage Area 8, the Regional Mainline drainage fee is $7,800 per net acre, and there are no Secondary Regional fees. c) Tract 15711 has provided land for an area wide detention basin. The owner of the land is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the land and ultimate basin related facilities (outlet, etc.). The fair share amount has been determined to be $5,000 per acre, which shall be paid prior recordation of the final map. 5) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: • • A-44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES • September 24, 2008 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • A ~45 3~, ~_ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2008-00143 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF MILLER AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE=APN: 1100-081-30, 04 AND 06. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements Comolehon Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. OS-44 Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 X c) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.75 d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,656.75 • SC-1-OS 1 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcond9-24.doc A ~46 Project No DRC2008-00143 ComoleLOn Date B. Time Limits 1. DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved _/_/_• use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Pnor to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Condtions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _!_/_~ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified In a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling _/_/_ unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adfacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. • L\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcond0-24.doc A-47 Protect No DRC2008-00143 Completion Date 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property • owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from wrought iron. _/_/_ 15. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ 16. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or • prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously / / maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 4. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in /_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _!_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcond9-24.doc A -48 Protect No DRC2008-00143 Completion Date 8. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _!_/ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on the submitted plans • that the xeriscape requirements have been met. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/ /_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2008-00143) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. F. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2008-00143). The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted Calitornia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/ /_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. • f \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stt rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcond9-24 doc A ~49 Protect No. DRC2008-00143 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. • 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. G. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building • permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. • 1:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & SN rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcontl9-24 doc Comolet~on Date -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- / / -/- - -/-/- -/- - / / /-/ / / A-50 Protect No. DRC2008-00143 Completion Date J. Utilities • 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. K. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage _/_/_ Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. • 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00143Stdcond9-24 doc A -51 ';-~~-. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • i ,.raxee_, ~ e' ~~ `~ District ~- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS February 20, 2008 Miller & East Avenue NWC Miller & East Single Family Tract SUBTT17919 & DRC2008-00143 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1' Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: • ~ a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 2000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. r CJ A-52 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire • hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until public fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 2. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. • A~53 PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: • 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • A-54 • ~ ~`. ~_~~, r~ , T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report . DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. • ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Conditional Use Permit and Development Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast corner • of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ITEMS B, C,D,E & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 2 • UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC - Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use PermiUDevelopment Review DRC2008-00163, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: The Commercial portion of the project has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .21 compared to a General Plan range of .25 to .35. The residential portion has a Conceptual Master Plan of 162 age-restricted dwelling units of 13.69 per acre which is under the range permitted under the requested Land Use Amendment. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre); Multi-family development South -Office and Community Commercial; Vacant land and retail commercial East -Office; Office park West -General Commercial and Mixed-Use (Office); Vacant land C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Office/proposed Neighborhood Commercial/Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) • North -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) across Church Street South -Office/Community Commercial across Town Center Drive East -Office across Terra Vista Parkway West West -General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office Master Plan) across Haven Avenue D. Site Characteristics: The site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by vacant land designated Office (proposed Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)) to the north, vacant land and commercial designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) to the west, an office park designated Office to the east, and vacant land and retail commercial designated Office and Community Commercial to the south. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Shopping Center 26,884 5/1000 135 138 ANALYSIS: A. General: The location is currently designated Office Space, but a land use amendment is also being requested to change the 2.89-acre portion to Neighborhood Commercial and the remaining 12:11 acres has a request pending for Medium-High designation for market rate age-restricted residential units. The requested commercial site drains to the south and is bordered by a wide (50 foot) shared driveway with a gas station/convenience store and car wash. The proposed small B,C,D,E & F- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 • Page 3 center is designed with access via the existing "L" shaped shared access driveway, which provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Terra Vista Town Center complex to the south. The project is designed with two buildings; the building adjacent to Haven Avenue is a single tenant (Fresh and Easy) of 13,969 square feet, the second building is multi-tenant on the east side of the site that is 12,915 square feet in area. General Plan Amendment: The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as; "The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include: eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be provided." The General Plan describes Medium Residential as; "The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested amendments is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive. Community Plan Amendment: The Terra Vista Community Plan identified a balance of uses, and • the current amendment is reasonably compatible with southern neighborhoods discussed in the plan excerpt below emphasizing more mixed-use and higher densities. Balance of Land U To assure the further compatibility of development at Terra Vista with neighboring communities, ~. Re,idemiel the northern two neighborhoods of Terra vista are more SPRR ~ residentially-oriented overall than the twV southern neighborhoods. In the tvvo northern neighborhoods, other e.,e uoe Rd. than the neighborhood commercial/professional centers and community uses in various locations, all development is • planned to be residential and open space. In contrast, in the • r nwa ¢ southern tvvo neighborhoods, a much~fiigher proportion of. =a'i = land is devoted to commercial and mixed uses, in o. conjunction with commercial development 'along Foothill °C Boulevard and the industrial park to the south (Figure III-7). Foothill Blyd. COMMERCIAL OFFICE, ,; ANO MIXED USE The four neighborhoods of Terra Vista ire shown with their Industrial Park full complements of land uses in Figure 111.8, FIGURE III-7 Residential Orientation for Northern Neighbofioods and Commercial/Mixed-Use Orientation for Southern Neighborhoods Development Review and Conditional Use Permit: The design of the Center and the conditional use permit as conditioned will provide for a shopping center that meets the following criteria: Provides a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading ,lighting, and trash collection; • The Center has been planned as a group of two buildings with one major (Fresh and Easy) and one multi-tenant building. B,C,D,E & F- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 Page 4 • The Center is designed with one theme, with buildings and landscaping consistent with the adjacent Terra Vista Town Center (similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and a coordinated landscaping theme); The Center makes provisions for consistent maintenance, reciprocal access, and reciprocal parking through existing and condition easements; The Site Plan provides a vehicle and pedestrian access that is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system. Details concerning the operations of the Fresh and Easy tenant are contained in the attached letter dated May 21, 2008, in support of a Type 20 ABC License which is required to be considered by the City Council as part of Public Convenience or Necessity Application (DRC2008-00475). Appropriate conditions have been included in the draft Conditional Use Permit Planning Commission Resolution to incorporate the limitations outlined in the May 21, 2008, letter. Please note that the Conditional Use Permit Application DRC2008-00163 is for the shopping center and that a grocery store (Fresh and Easy) is allowed by right. Other uses that are not currently proposed but may be considered in the future that would require a subsequent conditional use permit includes, but is not limited to, wine and liquor stores, fast food restaurants, and restaurants with and/or serving alcoholic beverages entertainment or dancing. Tentative Parcel Map: The parcel map is to create a parcel for the neighborhood commercial development and appears consistent with this type of use. Two parcels are proposed that provide • a building pad for each building. Phasing is not currently anticipated and, therefore, the shopping center will be developed at one time. The size and configuration of the parcel is consistent with the use as proposed for amendment under the General Plan. Uniform Sign Program: A Sign Program has also been submitted as required by the City Development Code. The Uniform Sign Program has been modified to meet the requirements of the City Sign Code and the comments of the Design Review Committee. B. Design Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval with the modifications, which have been included with the final submission included with this report. C. Technical Review Committee: On August 19, 2008, the Committee reviewed the applications and recommended approval. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A Neighborhood Meeting was held on June 26, 2008. Three residents attended. Three items were identified and addressed regarding lighting, delivery access, and landscape irrigation needs. See attached copies of the sign-in sheets and meeting notes provided by the applicant for more detail. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Air Quality, Archaeological Resources, • Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided B, C,D,E & F- PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, DRC2008-00163 AND DRC2008-00451 September 24, 2008 • Page 5 public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FACTS FOR FINDING: All facts for findings are contained in the attached draft resolutions. CORRESPONDENCE: These items were advertised as public hearings in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Planning Commission consider the applications for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, to be forwarded to the City Council for final action along with a request for the Council to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Additionally staff requests the Planning Commission take final action upon (unless appealed) Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 and Conditional Use PermiUDevelopment Review DRC 2008-00163 as conditioned in the attached Resolutions, with approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 by minute action only. Respectfully submitted, R~ ~~ • Jame .Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:LH\ma Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit I Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Draft Res - Site Area Map - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 - Site Plans - Building Elevation - Floor Plans - Landscape Plans - Uniform Sign Program - Preliminary Grading Plan - Existing Overhead Utility map - Fire Access Plan - June 26, 2008, Neighborhood Meeting Information - Initial Study Parts I and II olution of Approval for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 Draft Resolution of Approval for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 Draft City Council Ordinance for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163 • Draft Resolution of Approval for DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163 B, C,D,E & F- 5 t9[Y 6r6'60L ~3)IXISJY] LBi(6[S 6p6 ]NONa]t]l suers rrxero]nn 'Hxnan I/ION 9511 Stl]d0 )]A]0 A11NlIMMOJ S/M]] xb ~>W .,m.,.,,~a,,....,310 .. o..._.. NxCNI1eJ Y,.v.YM'JN WJ.N'd am-wvaen alwrv >wromsu' swrve-v»n I ~S rJrtl( bw vrx)I J~.+~i U Y/! ~o,m-,~ ~ _ ~,~ , ,voac vzrzrsn .~,crs , I ]wnxv Na S2MANJ M'V IJ]ttV.tl S1N](NN 9NMrrp a~~ jg` ~~ 8 6 ; a ~~ 6 i $ ~ BS ~~ F ~ ~ Y p `P $~ ~e ~ ~~3~ ~ ~E° 20 ~ y=~~~ = ex~~€ S ~ r 0.~ ti~ W ~' ~~ ~ ~ O m ~ ti o '~~ a~ ~~ h~ ~w w>r mrw, x,rvu .,.. ~rv .r .uv~ -+. m..~-»~: wlnxu rra-se. r y d .~ -"~~ ~~ ~& ~~ ~~ ~6 t ~~~~ o~r'R!~ c~o4~ e~ e e~'k bh$ ~~ ~~, o SC ~~ "-~ ~~~I~I~ ~ B,C,D,E & F- 6 ®,,,< < s. «..m ,r~..,W.,..a as a,, r vwx~/ fp[a'6I6'6a6 TInISJ•] & LpZI'6Lf'B06 '3NONdlI]1 YINNOJIIYJ 'YJNOYIIJ/IJ OHJNYN ~J~y188 sac s vmemm~ 'axndn By pyvsyl 1N3Wd0"13A]0 1YIJN3YIMW a ~j $ inr xlnxnwr 'x pal/ a ~ ~ 'e £9l00-BOOZJMO-dOJ sn]do,].va ulxnrvno~ sul3~ ~ e 29100-8002 JNO dYM 1778Yd 3Al1YLl31 z 4 ~ e e _ [6L81 Md1B/151JY81 3Al1YLN31 C mo .,.e.~~..,..,310a u®rmw axmm .,,'Id /vroad su/vr.W awraa ~ @ $ _ _ 1->j - 4 coal Iv [xy _ _ ~ _ -- ~~jjj --_~. ~r% -- - _- ~_ _ _ I _ k ~ ) rd ~ _ I ~ ~ - y3 ~~_~ - i 1 e fff e a ~q -.X-~ _ _ tltl I y.'. ."i 6•rv!B l'",. •./- `~''q• .$ 331 xo-x' '~a~2a < --`` ,~,' I ' ~C~~ [uYl M INL a W "~1,I4i•_ / i. QE{y~ ~'N'o _. it.. ' _ _:.' y.r'.=ti~~0~: a ".~ A' app @ :I-- ''~ i '!.. s Dual nd [~ .. .. ~ ,,, ',::,.. ER ~~~34@ ~"~ I .. ! . -_ ~a ~- --3~1. i, . ,fi=r-.=1 -- -' G / .:. ~ ~~ --- I ° {'j~, i' gp I ~ I I ~ __ ~T °° ill ...,I.I .. O C i" ~,..~.. -il~ -- -- ~' - - t .~{ mod. ~ I, .". 'l. .' .. v o 'e '_~L.~~.. ~I~~ ~- I ,"'I' ', . ~ ri °' g 3 -, has _ i. I' o _, p4d°~I ~~ ,~~ '- ii" m x~~ i r ~ ~!_.`;~I~ ICI F ~Z I -;` ~l~~~¢63 f I,jxl-I ~. g I ~ -,:., d'co1 ts1 - r' '" qq t ~ ,_ ~ ~3 3~eE 7F Q' 9 e ~ ~ ~ 9 yV ~! i-;, 4~ I' i I ~~ ~ ~~ ~YQe~~~ggiii~e ', fly ~. 1''i' O'J. ~ 3111 ~~•i5~•f~¢°b4~~~Ii i " ~~ I, __i~ i W §~'~ le9 e~e~e?44ii~: _ ;le[ I, 'I ~ ~ ~~~.,~.-ku; ,-'` : ~!.. 4ouf~~'k'EI 1=i' °m- I a ~LL~.I ~ ~ ...... r~ Ilrllr I G~,.f~4%3._I,_ - I 4 A ~~~ ~g S If'.- ~I I'~:~' ... ,~, 1 ~ Y'L -~ I I I fj_! Iv`I (i I~1_~ IL_Ji y ~' ~~~la¢ ' C„ ~i c~ie 4~ ~I~i~, -~.~,..'~~ ~ _ .. . p ' - 3~~' chi. o !~ e . i. ~'l "~ ~ I-' ,~~ ~ ~+ d - ~ ~ ~ ~ ,I ~~~ ~~ A~'~~ ~ .. '~q~u $g$ L . O ~~~ (( ~ ~ ~U Q I .. ~ "- I ' I~ W ~ s a ~ ~ . ~ ~ `~ ~ I ~ I "'~ ~ . ~ ~~. h ~ ~ q ~ U q a :~P W ~ . I 'Q I I'. ~ ~. d // 1/ ~ o O~ L o ~ I w qc J~5 ! 2 ~ i, ~ ~ ~ ~ r I-: e ~, -~' ill I .m / 4, - ,~ ~~ - 3{3{ W:.' ` ' :' . ~a~. . ~ 7 a . ce __ ,- ., - -- , ~~ s - . _I~~ b " ~`" , .. ... a ~RL ~X == i > - m __ o° _ any -_ _ H ~'^ o - E ~~°.~ rb a u v m '~m° Fmb am - F-'o a°, ~ 5 Li S~ a L II m -9 ai ~v nv O O °- o°°~ og`e om om~ E o o c m a °~ o= m r v19m°u° >d dmI rF Ff~ - 3 _ e a d'E -° m `-,°, ° Ep C i~ w r `o ~ v - _ m a "~ c d o e e a J Q o F r .~ .~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ bbe ~~~~ d~=y Y ~ m v E mF ~ / ~!. ~~ P~ ~ /" p/- /~~ \\~ ~ \~II\ % \~ // ~ \ dR \~ \\\ \\I r\ / ~~•' ~ ~ ~ w~ ~~ d*-~ I~ ~ R !: fl F R F- 3~ P~ ieiE T~ e( S? Sa ~~ 9 ~~ s9 ____-~- -~ w z w Q z w a x W O c S „~., Z s 8__ c§~:~ F~^. f$u 5ga83 ~ ~'- o~ °_ a n a F m C`7 ~O O O O O N U o~ Q a~ m s ` u ~ N N Z V g ~. OU F_ ~ o N ~ m ~ ~ E Q j o Z O~ =U J S U~ LLJ W C ~ Z~ ~~ ~_ ad ~m .~ r, -- ~ woo na j c_ e _ _ N ..m°U >d k .~ ~~ ___ ~ ~~ _~ y ~~ Y .f ~ ~ ~~ 6 T z 30 ~p ~`~ R na tl3 ---- ~. ~~~ad5 o~ OIII IIII] U .-_~ J Z Q 2 a _ % ~~ l i r - --- - ------ --~ - F- 9 U~ W ~ C ~M~ Z rc s- ~ ~° 3~~3 ~~g3 e~ ~ 3058 a3 ~3~_ F O~ <r G M~ W N M O O O O N U D o~ Q a~ E a~ s u Z g d ~ W --- N ~~ Q Z ~I W d L V ~ V ~ a m ~~ ~~ 0 a~ = V L U~ W C Z ~ a ~ = ~ 3 `. fop e a a. j. i. 4= f= ai r5 1. 9 i ?1~ 1i ii 6 >a a9 +I - o - ~ -~ ~ a_ _ _ w .m3u° >d I , ~~ i \~~ ~P ~P ~~ ~/( ~~~~ E & F- 10 w z w Q z w C a T.Jp W _ C s I~`~~ ~ ~_ `~ ~ ~ s. 3 $'~ i ee3p=~ ~~3s~ $ 4A._ 5-s" a9 ~~ Q~ r d m N C`') O O O O N U O O~ Q N S V N Z w _H N Q <Z J w d L Q1 r- U C ~v° _Y 6 K1 ~ C ~ O ~ E C7 7 = U 0 U~ W c Z ~ " _,'~, .. ~.~..~ ~ 5 ' .. S'W ' ~ ~ - L,C ~. ~ ~ ~~_ ,..ro - - m'~, ~o~e _ e § ^r _ ~_ ,~~1 y..J i Fgo- ~°~ 5e `~ ', ~~ ,.. +~t~~C i``~~ - ~' `~ ~yF p~~ ~,a _ ,y ~ n raj ~t~d' `>~' ~>' ~ .. ~'" S y~j ~ c CSF~~*FyNY ~~ _ _ g ~1 ~'~~tm~rp~t,E +~,Y~~~` ~ . >r~ a`W ~ x : 1~,1iy f z . R f ~( 6 `S'~.tfiTn ~ ~fi5.4,`fild r-. ' f ac 5 ~ e1 W~~. _ i ~*ti j YFgJ'' f '~ ~ ~~ J ~ I S~ ~ ~~ `~ £ I ~s K' ,l of ~ ~ uFSi ~aW .,' 1 ~~ t d-' ~, ~'« i;+~t ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ G 7 ' y f;iC Icx T i ~`tyY.f.''x.+ w~*,~7. lggg ~~~, y~~ j ~ '~ ~ (o C ~a ~ '~ F ~{lei ~~ Gi s Z " ~Ya ®~ f - O 33FFFFYY ~ ' f ~ N' L ~ in r ~ 1 x ~i ~ r ~, q C J„ry ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ v , Y. ai Y q''~ I ~ z ~N ~i y'',~t' r} `~~d"'f ~ ~ ate... _ .4~'^ " N _ 1`~q `~"~''r,F['ndhai ~. ..~-a, :~ ~ • °' _ `~'-`~~~ ~, n A, i~ r F ~ ~ ~v s ~ S. C ri'"'- qL fEEnz..'. f/) O ~ }~ ~. s ~ ~ Q: N d~ - ; i , ~ ~ O 'rte -nom - 't 'x" ~ x ~~' . Q ~ o 1 z*~ r ar ~, lh o- ,, ~§~ J,, .2_~ y -6 F4 ~ ~_~~ -~c~ -"V ~~:r v4~ ixTj~::. ~: *f L,.~ -~I'E. o- w ~ to e ~f lJ ~ q:' .d - - i UJ j2 aE S ~ p ~ t ~ as ~ f ~ ~. ~ ,5 MU # fl • ~V 3 _ ~ S 21 c' y f F :~ l~„~ ~ ~(~:~ t~X^ 4x~v~~~ M sa q~ Y ir~ ~t~L~ ~ I d ~ ,r r~ ,"k - ,"' -• - E dF ~Q ~~.., x ~ `g a ~ fir' ,_ t{ "~. y ~ I1"~ r ~ a I ,y ZU Y'r- m , f ~ 4"° ., at_r5~f't.t c x qn ~ ' F' c~ Y ~~ r ~S a~~ ~'f~~f'e ~ ~i i~ '~M~ Z P z ~ ~v C~u,`~. O~i~ ,( ~ I F Y C b .f', 'N6 , Q t, ~- cep ~fiv y w j ~ ~ ty Y ~,} ya ~{ `3~63 tiJ ~~, rS~~^~, q+=s~rtC, ~ Ey^c~h'~v C'~i ~~'~jy ~ p ikiu4 v5N SbN 4 r ~C ~>u- § a r.let( ~ /~ •* ~~a R f f yyyin :fi ~ k'¢~pi'~' m ,y"'4' _ z ~rP~wGI ixl I _,'~~Sm~ f W ~Y`R wt~" ~ 1C ik4 F~¢A ~r;~~m. ~ ~~~~ Y~r~~~~n6 df~^~r',: ~ ~ U 1 ---w.~:~, ~~.. , .. ,~~...;.~.~..~::~. ~ ~ ~ ,, ~ ~ Z Q ~ , i ~. ~ z~ ~~~`~ ~ ;. o'O;~ s~ • ` ^- .: ~~f ~ 'r: ~~z ~;. ,~ ~,`' ~ < t B C D,E & F "11 ;` ~~~ . _ ~ ~ - W -' ' ~ ,, ~ C . Z s • s ~~ r ; x ~~ ~.. ~~ e ~ ~ ~ x~?.r1 ~ - - I a s ~ ~= ~ ~ ~~,. n d1vT4~i ~~ ~j~. ~'e ~ f mt ~ a ~~~rf~ :~~ ~ ~' t gt~r~~~5,' Q E~ "~e ~y .. = ~ ~L.v , i w.pJtv~j ;,d t Iy-+~I ;`.:'h:.jinx W O ,v. ~rx .Y~l~: s .f1~ }~~...,. O ~ - ,' ft~,~e~ , y ~,i • y _ , p0 _ ~ .p, vtb r ~; _ ~ ~~'~ ~ ~..1t'}. ® ~ ~ y°, ~ ti.~.. ~,, ,. ~ '~ S t [f . -. t nY k ~. i I _ _ ,~ Y k S ° ~J t"' ':neS~:. ,`i ~ F sue.; ~~r,;;~ ~ ~: ~ o ~ Y: . ~~ ~• F .. r W ,'4'u a b,t+~s ,,:, '~', _ - ' /W~. ~ ~. Y k y4YS+.4~ ~ +r~~' .di(3n ~ U .III §~ 1 a~ .rl 'hd3 .. s d' rqi M~ s c ~ ~~ ~. ~~ 'ate Ai ~ ..WP a ~ ~~ ~ -N a r;.~ O . ~ Q~ >,d Q :F- z , , 4 ~ p ~"df~0 i a u >" ~: m W` tZ.~:"., I x~, ors,,,. ,..z ,~ Q - I, k ~ a zt r' - ~ w x w Z ~ x ~' B C D E& F 12 "Y ~{ ~'• , z r ~~w, . 3 ~z:.,.x , ' •.~ „ _ ~ ~. €~ ,~ '.. gym, ~ ~a 9 E 5 4'4 $ ~Y ~ ~rs ~ ~ ~ ~s §~S'~' ~~ e~ .. .. ~- ~ y 5y ~i S' . ~ a9 - .. O~ . ' . ~ r ~_ _ .. m ~ ~c. , ~ " ~'. °- . Z' N ~ o Q .. ~ ~ ..Q ~ ~ ~'°: -~' ~ Z :~'..,, ~ O .: ~ o :~crs W I ~ .~., a : Q .'y N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~~~ W W ~- W J r ~ - ~ ~' ~ W. ~~° ~ ~: ~3~ E , ~ ~~~ .. ,~ -~ ~ d_ ~~ ' S . i ~ . N . ~ ~ ~. ~ - ~ ., '~ ~ ~ ~ - p( ° ; ~ ~ H ~ ~, ~ O` L N I ~ N' [ ~. ~ :~ " N: i . ~_. U z I ~ ~ _ ' ~ 'o 3- v ~ ~9 - ~ . :F - " Q " ~ o J W ~, ~ ~f 7 ~ - - .. "- '~_"~ ~ V ~ ^ W O, cV o S~ W ,c ~ ...._ s. ' ~ ;;'.o :Z.s~ k - a- .. - - .. - . ' i §$ - a~. P.` _t r ~~ .. .. r ;~ ~ .. _. ~ '_ . ., .~..n O~ t WER r ~± r~ j{. < v r _. b3". 1~ •~ ~ d, 1s t t -~ s x- j1~i13~ ~ ~ 19- ~~ i~ - ~~ ~' t d!} i ~i~~i~ ,~ ~ ~~•^ a ~ <~ ~ ~~F ~ ae r ~~ oD . ~~ ,~ ~~ .~, ~ ~, ~) ~ O ~~ 1 Lr~z-. ~e I -~ f (J ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I s _ ~ _ 1I ` k ~ I ] 1 NII ~ Vr~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' j lY r `-°I } x.,nri: wflIJ~.4iA .E4 1~I H t .. l '7 ^1TT1~~~ ~~ ~ 1~ ~ J ~' J n ;, I i s • ~~, ~ x~ -~~ .:• ~ -fail ~ _ _ // ~ .t.~.y~•~~~•2'-k rt 7 ~~=fir ~~ ~ r w . U'' 1 - ~ ~~~ 1_.v ~ ,.~~ ~ W ~ Z ~~ ~,,,. ~ O i.. s ~ :~ °~~ ! ;: w , Z e2S ~ w~U, I :_. a ~ ~ _ .,, ' ...,,t~~'. t u i NVId 3Mf11Xlj e VO'VJNOWVOf10 OHONV2i s? ~Q ~ ~ ~ #:._ s ~ 3nIL10 2i31N30 NMOl ,' "s 3 s= '_ ~~ r ~' ~ a~ LL e %$i31 ~3; 3is3 3f1N3nV N3~VH -I ~. ~ e ............ t f Cl • Q 6 W K 7 F X O • EXHIBI"_ _ B, C,D,E & F- 16 U a 0 <d ~~ ~' I ~I ~~ €~~ -€ ~~ s~; ~~ ~~c _, s~ ~°' ;~?~ E~ ~~~~ [~ ~~'~ S3 6e~a ~~ ~3~~ u w Y H N W O c ~ W z e 'fig€9 ~~1; ya~OE S6g~ qs a~ € <r F- CO N W r N U F- /LL~( V N r N r L 4 _~ J ~ U r C d ~U v=i df m ~ C ~ N Z a~ =U 0 ~ Vs w W c ~ Z~ B,C,D,E & F- 17 e a . 1 1 3 3 3 1 3 S7 f t I i~~:a[it~ [ ~!iI~ f;~; 9{f E!?1tdlisls,~ft;z~;;~a ~di~r,~1~E1 ~ , E ! ~~,3ap~; § 9ES f J~! { f ll }ge ~ j l ! ! , f ~ i 9f1a ~~i ~~7i a~]~~E~€It~~6 i~t6e¢fii! s ~ ~a ~ I~ IF a e S~~ i a{ if 9! 3 g„ '~i~jlfsdll~ll~~~lFli~~i ~ S ¢ 9 ~%a~ i a@® ~ x 3 of u pOZ F 6N w I E ; i 41 ;i ` t S~ ~ 6 E 6 J„ i `! `t ~ !~~~ i f ~ ~ E as fi E [ S ! t ~ ^^ t ~ a j~ ~1~Izi l ~ i w V o .. = - ., v ~ t 7 1 l[ ~ ~ , a~ ( 3 i I d ~ o, W W - ~n w ~ ; t F 1 1 1!~ ~a ~ ¢ rv n - o o^ Q a, t 1! t! !! , t u ~ ~; a p ;~,E!I F~i~~ia~ ~ w m - gs ~ ~ ° ~ p~~a a ®~ z 'ti f~® yJ (j e '~ fa ;{ Py [3 jB n L.'2YGY a &g RS 9 va A 4 ' 85 3=~ i~ .. ~ g?s ' ~,..t 0!!11 - - . 0~ y~ ~t ~ 1 1 ( ( ~ l g 3 s Y o ¢ 0 o° zi ~N - '^z xu ~ po 6~ 66 ~ 3 1~ ~~ ^~ W U '~ a o W ~ W ' ° } k w, aQ EXHIBIT F m ~ o~ ~ omop W= o °_ ; ¢ w a5 " a _ _ J ` iJ J ~~ 3 ~ ~ a ~ w ~~ a ¢3 a uP 3 ~ u u o ii N ~w a ~ a ~ _ e O a_ o G ~ ~' m _ W a 3 w< r a ¢i w al ~~ 3~ o~ H~ -o ~ ~ :~ U ~U ~ o C~ q B, C,D,E & F- 18 Vii.,"'1j~ry-.' y`1 a. 3 ~r~:'j ~~ W M~ U /j~ r~ V 1 I ~U 7 ~ ~~ 0 ti >o :x ~U :~ U Z n m n r ui m ii F~ N Of 0 xm LL N n C O~ Of 0 U O U a d to LL 0 w _SN 915 91N0810313 _ ~c~ I evd _~" .v V ~~ :qe0 ~3i3P alea5 1 ~[iT u61ve0 N ` :vuVVd lW lunpaatl ~~ I !J(•f ~ NOI100lLLSNOO ve~ppe P p JJ Q p64Y IsNetl Y9 03~OH JV dd ~lenm tl[uaIIJ lae~m _. ~ I ~ .~ V SAT U .~ ~, U ^ 3_ o a y C'r i T o ~ U a ~ O ~ m U t~ N =~ J E O O G U ~ U m .~ W U m C ~ ~+ ~ A 7 ~ ~ o• c o o O ~ m `~ ~ n ~ 8 m ~ ~ ~ U D L1 Y y O .L U t ~ U W ' a C Y O j ~ U (~ ~` ~ r-n v O ~ W O O O ~ U ~ aO G ~ CO G ~ ~ ° 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ .. ~ ~ C o o ~ w o 0 a ro U a ~ - m = p t a o a~i p i U R ~ O .. .~ C o .~'. w N ' O ~ ~ ~ y C O C O_ a 'O _C ~ V U x ~_ U O O O ~ 4 . ~ = 'J . ' vi U -. ~ ^ y ~ ty U R U C y ~ N~ B O O ~ ~ O ny' U ~ OD 1] v. ~ - y p ~.. U .0.. N O ~ h N ro R C C h G O N c ~"" O ~ ~ 4 -` m . $ en o°'q m~ v °o v o 3 ro U ' - o 0 o v' o .d .. 011 R U . '0 .G ~ ~ n . C 7 C .y C . ro °° y N v' ly U U 3 U V~ y ^ F N .F b ^O .D G ~~ ~ ~ N O a'C .O ro U ¢ ~ ~~ U O ~ U ^ ~ _ U N . SS O . O ~-' U s .. 00 ~ c~ + "'~ ~ ~ U '~' ~ / N ~ U N> r U S' ' U^ O 01 C F ^' C ~ .. ` O v: ~ v. ~ .~ O ~ Q ~ U O c U o O bq ~O .^ b ~' O .. ~ G x H ^ p O U . T . eUi~ N N'00 ~ Z ~'O G ~ = Fp , O rJ 6W Ed'° a~'c 3".60 a~ c^~ uo C. C'> ~v~n ~J~O.,UQ ..F pV n d C o o v.:= m v'n F- m ~ a cn ~ at z ~ Q o.U y. ~ [-F-rn ao ~v 7 G U cam. ~ o O A L ti U~ = -~ N rn V ~N 3 0 3 V ca y c a 0 b N U C N d 00 O 3 s 9 c1 N O i .d v U 0. v a C O m ,C 6 C U ~ O C U O t. `~ ,.. C O U O b n ~' > N ~' d u ~ ~ v F U ~ Q U c3 ~ so®:eie. neuw Z6L6'I65'606 xvj [pL016S W61e1 ows n0'vv~V9 lawls we 6asc1 NOLLIYOJYOa ONY3MYIllf u6~g ~euo~~eN C G ~ v, p ~ G .U- ~^-~ ce ~ O o .~ G U U y n t - 3' ~ ~ U O ~_' U '~ n ^ c L Q W O G O O ti -~ U U ~ ~ C pH rr_l~i ~I ~~/ W U rz^ V I--1 B,C,D, SN•JI$ OINOtllD3l3 .ne '^ • p5 1 •-cq :nu l%ep L6LS'165"6n6~%•d %L~ I~6Y6pn N1 a ~~:.+ep ~~+1 • v a'+nw rvnw.r xe ouisra'a~Na'+»ns w~j pezn _ _' - - 9tl NpLLantllSxoa x:%%upptl xouaoauoa oxunrorn• - - -- - = = ~BSZZ i%wx xiuinouaevn ieemaerrv.na aaal..a U61$ ~eUO1~eN _ = =000 ~ ~ 3Y' y'f '.. L1 ~i ' "N {~ I(~,- ~~, ~, ~ ~: H~'~ ~-v +Vv ~° i.~`C. ~~w+ ~ F p ~,: ' «.,.z~F• , w .. ~ ~ ' ~ ryz ,.; .~ ~ '"~,_ i~'D~ ~ I ~ ~~~" ' N a L 'y O O T =~ .O .b O pp N C O ~ v ~ Q. Y ~ ~ C -' D ~O a v z o v ~ a ~ rv m ~ O G U ~ d W O n) y ~ 4 ~ a G %a U 4 u G 3 a, c m °' c c C C O ~ O '.~. L e~j A 'D U v ~ C ~ N ~ ~ ~ U c ~' v ~ ~ n a m ~ d ~ m v >_ o ~ ~ _ w 3 ~ c ~ ~ c~ b V ~.C N ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ C m y H O ~ ~ T N A U ~ ~ O. ~ y N to U v, C % ti 'O ~ •O d ~ N Q .ti y ^. b9'O '~ y ~ ~ y ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ O w O °z w~ o~ ° a ~ ~ a ~ o_ O .-. ~ h =? ~ J m C O' U n U ~ a P ~ e_p c w ~` oa o ^ ~ O o ~ n~ Ltl Q 'Q N CL O OU p ~ C ¢.C q ~ 1 +y 5 c ~ a3 %.i a ~ T ¢ d ~ ~ ~ ~ N U C ^ d .Un 6 x' O O N -~ N M d a C 3 00 .n 0 w F y O R W Y O 3 w 'o R C W O O V v +n ~" r oo rn HI W U ,z^ V HI -SNOTS OINOtl10313 - efie ~'-Z :aled TRa-N :aleas 1 aii aau6lsap d E axWd ~3'+fiN luroaay 9d ~ xou]nwsxo] a ~ T v~>rv s cov ss~a U06ZZ Islrotl tl9 fi3dOM JVx :Ieno+ddy luatlJ 'NaIO+d N y s 0 v m` L U j O U N U N N Y O O d U N b U L 3 cu .n ro t 0 n `o 'o ro V ro N Y ro N 1 1+m1 ~~ i ~ .+1w ~ + . A C ' Y i~ , . .~ ~~ < UU ~i. •t. ~~C H. 4+i'~ ix 1 y ~ 7 tW U,'' ,~ r5 x~ Kam' ~ gJ„f,m /+ U ~ U ~ ~ C ~ z° ~v 00 s 6 Yn N p U F ro b .C N .. H N N Dp c ro a o CO w W O"i+ a '^ o T V. ~ C O L -~ ~Q .~ ~~ C ^ G O D C cJ id F W +~ ro ~ U C. W 'w F ~ N M V vi su®cenv 6w.. Z6[6'I65606artJ Z>G>1656'fi Pl OI Gl6 tl]'wN]~Iau15 Wtl OiS[I ouvnodnoo oxuaxtlvn u6ig ~euo~~eN FN~I W W iy-i W U rz^ V IH B,C,D,E & F- 22 -SNOTS OINOtl103~3- b .yee ~~~ fs woa awsupseles Ileuw ~~~ q~.01ep ~:cle>f lesi~:Bau lap yfiL6'165606 Xej 20L6'l65'6W IB1 uupm~3 aBW lunwatl .aaoVd OILI6 tl9'omYO'IBagf NUj O05Cl _ - _ __ 9tlJJ NOILOI1tl15HOJ NoultlOdtloa oNlL3Mtllnv - 0644 Ispetl bl p3dObddOtl Aenaadtltl lualU V dlp~au 1 "v s1N'pe u6ig seuo~~eN -SN`JIS OINOk110313- S exva ~~~ aa5 woa~awzut~wrza I~ewi ~~~ 60 2/ 2 ela0 ~~N :alea5 ~ :+ I%a0 26L6165'636~ EbU 1656661a ~~'+6W lunwaY uoyd Ol[l6 YJ'owyypa4544N OC5Cl c ~ = = $ff NOIl00tl15NOJ d wo n ssx+ppY xOLLYtlOdtlOi OxLL3MtlON tl0! 0350313tl _ _ _ = _ = 086ZZ .%wtl 903~Otlddtl :leno+ axrvano yaa~me a ~g ~euo~}eN '~ U U- Z O; ~.: . U o',,r;' „ U.". ~'" : ~. O ur O c u tO ~ ~ ~ 1'i ° OO 'J ~ 4) JO N U U c 'y \ .C r U L N 9 v da ro o E E o F > fl,.4 ~ 'o a ou ~ ~ ~.. ° K ~ c j 'O V 4J > N ~ y 'O e`i+ U C -~ ~ O X `~ on ~ O U C v O U ~ C C y. ~ d ~ ' y .O C b 9 ~ `~ C~j L: O~ O ~ it ~y ~~ iv 0 >, ° ~ o ?: c o o ~ ~_ c ~ ate: ai ~~ U a nu 3 Cc n~ 3. u'o uF~v~ u m v ~ ...o >.. o0o a v `d c s.^ C O L U ~ O On .~ 9 ,~ ° ca` 3 co°'o v+.°_. aGis mmo~,.co, ~'c C, m O O m A U - C~ ~ m z.. ~ ° o ~°~ Lon `v oco r°a y' Yc c_oV~=.oo 3~ 9 n ...~ C L o.'y O h C O ~~ U^ ~ ~ GO J .~ p N w m v o 'o ^~ o,=°~L ° ';1 G y O p M'.- j .DD ^ ,~ zy H pp"O O`^ X t.°. .O .. U > vL L T U.~p O.. o o L m~ L c y 3 v 'ono: 3~ e ^'O c o ~ v,tb ° .. -,m oE° ~ a o v c ~E 3~ CO O U .~ cGJ C 6 ~^.+Sw C d~ D i+t ~~ 0 0 C N U L ^ U y ~ U U O [~ F .D ti O C> G~> O 4. o y T C C U ^O O b y rl y N N O U .-~ h ~~ N~ N R ° ~roo, m °' 3s °~ c~dmb c iO Onm~ Y+.. m ~ :: o H ~ o v ~ on one ^ m M J_N ,o .o wr N O Y~ ~' T yCi 0 0 N v O G ~' p ~p O U ~ m `~ O'U ° bn m~r°' v ~G ~>m u~yvU ~~h>^L.G vm C O L' O. C O' O d '7 ~ v, w0 y ^ .d ^ LvCi v ~ ~.~ Q U C ~ ° Gv m~ O N ~ ~ m ~ e ' y ~ U~ b C O U~ w ~~ N~ 'O y +~ ~ ~ ,- I,°-_ NO.n o '~ ~~ ocntd'_' ~w° ° a3 y p,ow^" y~ ~ C '°O ~ O y v U C ur d° C L w 7,"E w w C~ O a0i U ~"3 .°c ~ 3~E ~ ~c°' Sac ~~°~~ (^o.d">u'SGa N ro ~ ~ O ON ^ ° G 04~ ~ OOO ~v~ 'TYOmv ~~NOCn a>JCm'O ~ ,N .~ ° ° ., c ~u y c ~ E ° .p y~ p c' 3 ~`w cti ^ v° ~ ca .n ^ ° v °' E'h m m ^ m io c. v `v o o m m ~..-, ° a2~.°„-° o Evmmn U m.NO~o n~ v U O C p....y E C m A .^..~ .an~L. C y r y E [ :ti ~ = c~ " v'o `'°' v 3 ^L' o o _n E .~ °-',L b a -~ ~ o ~_~ ~ ro ~~ >. v ~ oco'c ocn 3 0 °c° G a ~'~ v~ n .a ? c g ~° ~ C ^ C ~ .... d L' C'y 4 V] ~ X U ~ w .] ~ L'7 0 ~ .k o ~y ~ .a V] ~U ~aoiU F .°D~o oy°ac,~`°~~~:. ~`cnE`°~~a~i^oo O~ F--o°-_°ii~ ~~m v~~OCCimai v°~+ccitum oiO ti_onE ibi °~' ~~~' m~ °: ~ F ~~ c.mK ~ odfn=.°a~Fd°i=in os M.°J L' j m ~. 3 0 C O o.E., fn .~. t^ t~^ N M G .~ N M O C z ~ y O~ C U 'o_ _? Y .. n o m O' m O m U ?n ~ pn U QU ~L. 3 h E ri vl w~ E[-.yw A .o -+ N M 7 'n b C y ~ ~ ua O .+ U O > 6 '-~ '- P. w ~ o b O O 'O _ G C., O O O '~ ~ U O'O C ~ ° ~ i ~ O. _W.CD ai .C. ro~o~ ~ ~ ~ cw ° .no O a p ° U ~ ~ 'O u U O W O ° ~ _ -j U~D .. G O ~ M r C O ~ O+ i ~ .`~ ~ cw^, C O ° ... W 6[~ p v C ~ ~ N U P+ ~ U N a X ~ ~ 0 yi i a^ F a i o :~E o: -d ~¢ ON 'C h roz o E._ - ~ " o U ~ w Ma ~'C ~ E- ~U ° d d -u ~~ C ~'v+ w ~ n v w R C C w ~ .. .^ .n b n ° ~~.].-7F en¢Q n en ,~ a ~ ti's --1 ct ~ ~ ~ rrW,, Y~ Iy-I 1 •1 U z _ su~sales Ileuw SNOIS OINOtl1O313 wed "^ :elva ~izH 'wleas ie.,lT:auelead i&s'tss'sO6aMed a>Lr'tss wslei ,vupw 3 vBq luroaay :euaYd 0L66 tlp ouryp'IaeA54Yi30BSt1 ~- - ~_ 99N ~ NOW'(Itl1SN0'J ~ ~ST~ST tYaOVV MOLLNOdtlOJ OnIL~`Itlenf _ _ _ - _ _ ~86z7i IsmaN uq°u3O3ias'Ndavtl a.nmaaylYaoo spalma u6ig ~euo~;erJ _$N[.]IS OINOtl10313_ ->, '~ Bed ~' ne B l9/ Ie0 ~'%nS y L~ :ouBlsap ~~ LBW lunaaatl .[uaVd !Jd ~ ~ NOLLJpw5N00 a ~ L ccupptl J 08642 Isldatl BY Q3ApHddVB 1[roLddtl luall'J 'laalald ~ ~ W ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ % ¢r n N ¢ ~ N ~ p ~S~O~ ¢ }} ~W Z } Z uj Z ~ ~ o tiw d ~ o[ i~w~ jl~ ~~~~~z ~u ~ 4 - 3 ~O z~ N m 3~ W } F Z ,p s z> U ~ W U ¢ K Z JW Z ¢ d O~ O (~ Fw- ~ K ~ ~ w ' ~ <~ W < 3 w _ l0 UpL .~1- = 3~ ~ N~ (n In ~ ~ 3 W W W < z W U j 6C ~ W ~~ ~W m J o C ~ m K ~ ~ o w t` N ¢?U d ~W~ o ° ~°03 ~ z i=w Z ~ NwZ d ~ ~W¢ E I ZN ~ UW~W z ? wdw> z Qw < wzu~ K ~. N¢ ~ KpVLa ~~ ~UGLL~ Z N ~ z O ~ ~ w ~ ~" w w ~ .. U W W ~ Q ~ ~ d ~ J B W °- z ¢ ~ . ~ ~ W w ~ w < ~ J LL F K m J a C~~~111 '~U U '7~~ ^~ '~ O u J- ~¢~WW~ ~Nv 1 ~ ~} N VaZ~Z¢W ~ r ~Z }J}UWwU)B=C~ n N z? BLZpL~pW~ N ~ VH W ~~OSOU ~ W ~U F ~U>19 m¢ o ~- u ~ ~ w Z J i >[[W>WY tl ~ QQQO~w NZ ¢ ~ ~K o Ew ~m~~N> z ~ ¢w "' odnv~¢"~ w ¢ w¢ w J W w¢^z ZZZOC 'U ~ ~~10 ~3s»OL>l'J ~ Q ANN 3 O ~ d z U N U ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u U ~ ~ o< w ¢ r ~ m - LL G W N Q Z H J Q U H N r a II Zw Q ¢ G U G N r6'~a [~~aanc n.ura 26L6165'6L6 red 26L>1656061a1 OLLI6 tlJ'omVO'LeaL15 Wj OBSCt OLitltlONOi OxLL3lltlall a u6ig ~euoi}eN W Q a OQ ~~ ~ ~~ ~„~ o nn~ L~~ 0 v ~ a~.S ~~___~ i1~ j m I I 1~ ~L FN I+-I W U z r-I rn -SN°JIS OINOtlID3~3 =~ 44- ' ~~~ ~iY~ ~5~ 8 •fi.a '• ".•• ^• aooziarz :a{.a Z~:.re>s l een :...fiN.a 'vfily ryn.>atl :aooyd J°0 vv Jd NOIlOOW.6NOJ Of U35V313tl 9 3 4 1 M~~^vN :xmpptl v pp OppZZ suolsyatl tl Y03notlddv a.smedv w.lp :ualovd' 1~~ 5=y a ~~ 5 _`.'~'L ..~ 3 9a '~ .. u =N~- ~7~ 5 ~p ~-~~~ a ` ;iw ~:M~ ::Is~~ F ' / ~ ~f';''~ o. ~:i;' °_ ~;. ~~~~ I ~ i"lyaw ,'d#~1w - ~ ~Q ~~. ~. .~zti~~ ,; ~ % =1 ~. ~ n , ~~ +Y ' k ~'u . "a`~ 4ii V ~ °t 8CO ,_~'~® ,~~o_ ~ _' x `' :;~~'sy y-'~ (i9 J Z Z 0 0 ~~ Z~ ~~ ~~ ~E uN~sal.c Ireure y6(6 I65"606 nj syp(y {65'6061a1 Ot[I6 tl0'>my0'Iaen544tl OB561 NOLLYtlOJtlO'J ONV~IYYN u6~g oeuo~~eN ~ _ d o ~ s ~ s ~ t' e ~ £ ~ s z a ~y ~ \ ~ ~O ~ 2 z z E i a N ~q i y ~ e ~ w g ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ \ `C j S ~ Y S ~ i ~$ C G o - 0®®0 00 ~o® o Z {Vf3 Z i ~~ ~ ~l I 1 <~ ~ _ _ `R 'e ~ mE vl Fsd~~~ O & Q~8 ~ ~~~ z ~~- ~m ;a~ '~,~~1 cos g ~~~f $, J ~~a Y H _ £~ Y'W ~2 9 Yid £ g O f PAY € ~s ¢E'O ~__ -~O ~__ J";O ~ 'w = _ ~w _ w _ ,V, i ^ f~ C ' ~ \ L_~ ; w L_~ ~ w i ~U iU -'LL ___________- LL _ 77 W D 0 C a~ w~ 0 0 U 0~ 0~ (yi W H .N, W U z N~ -SN°JIS OINOtl1O3~3 _ e6etl ~ ~~ o BOOZ/92 .ate0 paIDN slaa5 1esp :mu814a0, O` •aup=e~ 3 a6N lunoaay .woYd 9 H NOLLOOtl16N00 waonp a=w ~ u=~ ly ^v esalppy a ~ /p~~ c Qp6ZZ :suolslnatl tl4 03AOtlddtltl ~le^o/tlEtl luellJ :W~o/d 0 4 ~ N O U U LLm~ H e6~ o ~ UO O r UW ~ UW <6'2a WU'~Q 2 ~ S~ U >i ~ g 2 K ~ LLp¢w¢ O r~pO W Omz~ a 2i>w FF C~ U J z rv ~nwLL W rc U QW 'U~ Q W W r ~ F E W N ZZ~(O p ~ ,y00~ ~ g Z W~rvLLCi a q ~zo~i H K ~ O n rv' Q Z a W Q K m w Ii X W ~ W~ p W O 1 v1 ~ Z ~ ~ z¢: w = wi W K u vl- vi ~~¢~~ LL k /~N on =.r.l I T a#a~. ~i. ~~~<~* N M t0 00 I ~ .~,~ .Q-~ .~~'.ti r ~ ~ ~, ~ a _ Q ., W .,' [.y ,,~~ WU U _'?~,;a z z 'w~r,~ e7s o ~% {''i ~,C^ ~~~_~ ~ ~ ;,gx _ c o ~`~~~~~ O O O m ~ ~ C. s~paaie: neuu Z6G6'I65666 n3 ZOG9'I65'6W Ia1 OlGl6 tl0'ow40'Iaa+164U~d fiB5[t MOLLwOCtlO'J ONLL9MtleN 4 u6~g ~euo~;eN ti ~ s~ f ~ 4& y~& a ~ ~s`3' _ ~a[t# y ' r •+ i~ i ~ ~ c x. 3g 1]~ 5ii kt s , ~F t_~ uqq a= S_h l ,4 ` ~ E4 ~ 95( t , •~ - C 7 ~y _ YY~ c ~~ ~ i - N ~' ~*~ [, ~ O O S a n(• O z s ~I' ~~ / W W r~.y $' p. Z g ~ L ~'' ~~„ o ~ N~". Y 2 S s ~ ~ c A a ~ J S S Y C ® ® ^ ® ®® ® N O q V n m `o rs~ c s v 8 ~ e 1 F N • jf H ~i W NE--I W U rz^ V B,C,D,E & F- zr~~ SN`JIS OINOtl10313 see -• --~ „e 6s woa aww®sales lieu`s q~y~:alep ~TjoN :aleaS lull :.ou lap 26[6165'606 Mad 24[I'L65'6WIa1 = = _ _ "a ~~~ IDuWee~3 'IpW lum»tl :euoxd OLL46 tl0'owVp'KMS YUB OBSCt ~~ a = i _ ? _ = 9d xolmnxisxop ~ L x ase+ppv xouvxoaxoa oxlLaaxeW v 3'---'c ' 3 ? ~$szz Islney xi aanovua'dvx :leno.adr Cuero a»Imd u6~g ~BUO~;epj SN°JIS pINOH1Wl3 Bed B L92 :alvp ~pi;n7:e~o5 1~T~eeuBlsap Z6L6"l65'6C6aWd 26L6 L6S W61e1 __ _-_- - -_ - ZL e ~~ ea n.a ~ ebb:ere. irea» ~~~ vpp ~unmaY ouoyd BlLl6 tlJ'omyJ Yaag5 Wj 005L1 c = ~ - - = c tJ}j NOLLMtl15XOJ L9+W ~+`M.zze~ppy MOLLYtlOdtlpO ONLLiztleNY - _ = = = v Q$6ZZ iaiwtl tliaanoueevtl yeno/ r~yenJ :~aala.a u6~g ~euo~}eN SNOIS OINOtl1O3~3 se -~ --_ .n woa awm~sales Bewa ~e a ~R :alep '-d~:aln5 ~ IBauBlse(1 26[6165 606 Me Z6L>I65 606101 -~ ~ --3a-pl3fj"tfiW lunoaar 'cuoYd 0lGl6 tlp'awVO'IaegS Wid OBSCI > _'--_' y ? . __ 9tl uolmnXGSUOo tl01 tl350313tl t>I pOtl MOIletlOJtlii OX11.3MtlOllr _ _ _ v ~$sZZ 'moltlnetl ra3nauaar .1eno,derrvelu ~+ao~o+a u6ig ~euo~;eN _SNOIS OINOF1103~3- wau~saies hews i6C6165'606 sed L6CV 165'6661a1 OLCI6 tl9'oulY9'1wAS 4WJ fi65L1 xoumodnoa oxuaxnrx u6~g ~euo~}eN »o ~_ ~~ w9~ m~ ~ o ~ ~ w <f o J ~ :< cp x no so :,, a~ o~ ~W a< ~ ~< of oY a~ oLL o. o~ o~ ~~ aS+ cr am as Q a w 4a u, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g z3 o~ s w w w o W o W~ 3~~ 3~~ J ~~ o ~ ~ ~ z z z z ~o < z~ :w u F p ~W: _~. < ~ LLO ~m Z o' 0 0 0 o a o ~~' ,'nu r: nuS ~ p o O O d~ .? ~ e L O ">~'7 bed 9 -' •nn 900219/Z :alep Pe:oN :alea5 1 SIT :+aufilsap afiW lunoaatl :euo4d n m Jd NOI1pptl15N0'J tlpd p3Stl313tl op 9 3 eanp oywe +b»:u wo19+M UwN seappy 0~6ZZ uolslnatl 4p3/.ptlddtl Aanmtltltl luapp gwlad `SO :;~UL~~ >~y: ~ .7 rvzhr '~ ~Y"'i tV~»,, ~ .~ :~ ~""~ 7 O O O O O O O O O xr rx w F U z C.7 i--i b m a_-..,r.,,,.,~ tees b96a66 ~nminra 1 6'„N~O6 3NONa3l]I wub mn •axnan ma aaam ]AY NlY1Nl10/! N 9511 SN3d0]3AS0 AIIN/1ww00 5/M]] .~•wn ,..^.~o ~"»,3lOO Ne^e s,_mna ,mdaoxw '.~-sal er q vwaodnun 'roNOwrana owaNra 1N3Wd0]3~30 ]VIJtl3WWOJ reloo-aooaJno-dnJ Z9l00-8002 9N0 N{']d 9NIOVN9 7VO1d39N07 L6LB! Wd1HNS 13Yd1 3Al1VIN31 .vam] /ma /nnaee sau/w] ]na«rao ~~~ p \~E k S @' 8 @ ~ ~ @ n ~~~$ ~ n y pp pppp ~ 5 ~G 3}a @@E8$~4~6F€$8@ $F@3~~~@S~~os~i 3 @ S~ @$~ a [L ~ ~ elf a@,. ~ ..gip .•tv 9a~FG€;zt le pp9tG ec...4~4@ ?~~ 4Qe, e: yy k$t Sa~~ I~ ~ s sv9uc2 ~ °z ~ ~ ~a~~ 6 @ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ g s Yq ]1r"""Na ~ P~ 8 S~ `a~~e gggg@~t98;85 eE4 ~4p SGd~4@s~@.5@n'g ~'i~ ~ ]3a]y] °a ag ~®8A@B¢@q ~?@:a@8?6~8e?~@.s~?BP~~ 8 ~ GG C. a 7, & ~,3~e ~3~p~ qq~~ li ...:aassas: e.aa:; eS a;._ @ / ie i• 9 4p pg• p I' ~ ~~a4 ~:~~ }X a~~,p~ y[ gp t _ ~ ' II'J ~., ,~ ~ ~gtl 9a$tls t& £ ~ ~ s ~ s $ € ` 9tl•"~i Vii: a f{~ ~F ,@ ~ ~~ e F" V 3 9 ~' ~ d"~ 8§ gq@ 4a 4] a~ ~ a @ ~ '~~~ ~~,. ., zdc~P3! a~R~~ Od ~~ ~ x as ~ I9 3 9 . , . ~°~ G p PppE~yy~ E- N~~~~ 6a~ G~ a ~"ce i....,: s.d:t-'~~s ff~-: a II U ~~~ ~~ 45" ~~8 ~@~~2 z t t ~ ~ r lt' r r +'n ,, ~ ~~vs ~ ,~ ~ i3~::~'~ h y~ ~G .~,/ ~``' _ ,vim, I ~,~ Qi v 8~, ° {~ I ~ N9' ~'@ ~" rr -,u ~ ~' - f 91 I~ 61 Cr t /` ~~a ~a i" ~'~ E.'~^'~~W ~j, s ~ N ? ~ !': ~ i, '~ ~ i' L ~ ,,,.,~- ~o-. I ' i •W- ' _ u ~ ~ ~ .~ .. W~..~ ., ~,~~ ~, t ~ 1 Q I Y _ ~i. o ~ tltl N gg 1 @p ..~ ap T. .,, ~ ~ pF ~I-j ~~ + t,' ~- '9 I~Ij I IE@4@~ a w „m~ 1 ~ S ~~ ~ t it P~~ I ~I a ~1~ I P.. @ ~ ~ - - s+ "xl .rp P~ ~IYf 3 I ~ _' .~6 (~~{ I ~~ C~ sQ' i :w ` 3$ ~4,'~ ~ ', - ' a ~.,,,, I~~rj ., '4i ;~• ~: ~:•'y',-,i I~\ _ '~. ;~@: ¢~ i a ... ~~, "t~~3 r Q'~F{~ r~ ,y I Ih ~ ~@ t~.^9u: 8 ' I -<i ` I __--- - ~~ J° tT J m' ly I~ G'3`- ~~ "`~li.~,v4~ ~`,~I I•__~., ~- ~~:~~~^i,~*~m..=i, ~•:i ii~ Y n----..,fJu .mrn.,~.,~....:+9:: "~~~r~. ~~„I ~~:, p~.,',~`~, j~~-^; 4!~ ~, ~ ~ - Z y t 1 / - rte. ..r':„ r ~ ' x ~ 1 17~~ ,.m I n l '4 ~ t .~. ~ t Y ': it, ~ ' ~ ' r~ 4 ~k ~€~ ' k', _ ~ ~,x ~ ~~ ~ ~~~. B C p.E~.&,'I ~~' 34 --~''aS I~~~:~~E- -'dl '~'.:_i. Mb's ~° - EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY MAP EI e s1~ RESIDE 71AL ~ ~ ~GUY77 ~'R N :«t"r~% ~f ~-^- t` f- PPS 1&6J~r ~ ~ I ~~ '~ `~," ~,y ~ r~t-~~~ ~"~..; iL U' ~ dl~ RE x '77 s. r ,,_ ~ K _ __ .~" 1`~-,.- ~, ~ , ~ l ~~~~ °~`~` TENTATIVE TRACT ~"` %~ '=~~~1 ~~' MAP N0. 18608 .>' ~~ ~ `' 1 Ir r ~t~s. f ~„~~~~'" > 11.83 Ac. f ?? // F ~' ~€ 3 I IPP a N ~ i ~ I fff' ~Lr ~t ~~ ~` ~ ~~~ /` yp4 ..~ ~ ~ z ~ O ~: ` ~i ~! ~ TENTATIVE . ~ ~ ~~ PP~ ~ ARCEL I ~ ~ ~ `~ ~~ ~ i ~ 0. 1879~.~ ~ , ~~ ~ s i ~ , ~~~~~ I , ~, ~ ~ !~I 2.80 Ac. ~ .~° PP ~^ - i fi~ .r '._ ~ JX~' f ~ ,1 ,, fj ~ STi~~I~ ~ ~~/r'' . ~ ~1~' ~ \ µ„>~ ., „r SCALE IN FEET I PP, t ~ o iao goo ~ ~ ~ -r°"~ ~t ' r` P ~ ~o ij ~~` n ~ M~. I I`~~-° ~~ _--~ `°' ~~~" ~r cod LEGEND I f ~~ ~ ~~ ~~- ~"` 66KV 66KV .OR LARGER ELECTRICAL LINE E ELECTR/CAL ~~ T TELECOMMUNICATIONS MA D O L E 1455 AUTO CENTER DRIVE Y SUPPORTING POLE SUITE 200 _ _ _ EXIST/NG UT/CITY LINES ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ONTARIO, CA 91761 -"'- EX/STING PROPERTY LINES 909.937.9151 --~----~~rt r'...nm„pities fOr Life www.madoleinc.com SlT~ o.,~~n/ngRY f9L96~6606 "]lll1I5JYf L6ZI'6LC 6OQ ~]NOXd]I]/ SBL I]'.1Y IN~l NI/1011 NN `dll WYMd-N sn~doa~nJa euNnnnoJ s%N] ..... ~~~^^~~3lOa uaa.mu ' ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ '~ ff g ~6 ~[~ 'p4p~ y 2 `JQ ,y ~ Uo ~~~ a d a-~` aen U 0.'~~ ~p P+ 0 ~' ~S~ Sge5C 6 ~ ~ p p d®d h YINtlOJnYJ bpNOWYDOJ OHJNYN 1N3rvd0]3A30 IVIBa3rvrv09 r9lao-aooz~ao-dn~ Z9100-BOOZ 9a0 NYid 1N3MlaVd30 3W~ L6CB! Ndl905 19Ya1 3Al/Y1N31 srN.++o .w,e n~vn+ cw]uro] x+r»] t _ S' ~- rty g cee _ ~~~ I " es Is ~ __ 1~ . ! S{ ~g~t~E `I~ j ~ I ~,~ ~I' ~~~ ~~ i II I ~. ~ _ 'I 1.1 I I , : ~ ii { j~ ~ PPS! F ~ P i ~~• b' ' ` ~ ~ i ; • ~;;~~~ I ; ~ ' . i~ - 1e11ii ~ ~ g ~. ~ ~ 9 E ~, ,: s,~a.F~ j if~t1; , ;.~: ipp t ~3 l~ ~ I ~i~i ~i a i§ie~ ' elii ~: ~ ~~~~ i ~~ ~~~~ i 9 i i s ~ i '~ ~ ~ &pp $ f 5 P E ~ ~ \ # ~ . Q qp~q ri ~ P ~4 §~~ r , ~ ~ i ~ oo~~/d~~ I I ~jG:3 1\ ~ j i t~ 3~+ \ ` qq ~t_ t, .h.,- I~ ~ ~I~~ ,:_,,,,= 'ill ~~~ ,_ is , ~. ~ J l' l ~ / _~ ~ ~:v ~ rr ~~ _1 I ~ . 1= - - ;} 1 ~l ~ 1- e:1 _ (( __ L ~~ ~ti ~ may, I _r ir _: _ ,. ~' ~ ~ ,d . ,' ~r, z I ~~-'I!' I~~\ III ~ I~~ I Q~ •I I ~ _ I_~.I , V) I i I \1 ,ice li it ii I ~I I .1 S ~ I ~1:_ I 114 I, i i I ~ ~ \ - -- • ~ .r ~~ ~ I I A ~,. ~ 1'f ~.\_..__ Ili ~ I ~I i / I ~ ~.- ~_\...~ ..~ ~f. - ~.i , I ~ ~ ~~-~_.~_ ~~ ~q~r' ~ I .` ~ , ~- ,~ r `! I . o ~ 6 tl ,° --~ !~ ~ tll W ~ a ~ E z 3~~ p ~`E ~~_ 3 B 3 ~ f ~I .`° yi~,~ ~ };~~a E{6t~° ie=x~g r F`^ s£,fa- IP ~6:^.fla2 IP P ~~II Q ~~ I ~ I ~ I 6: I ~ 61~ R„ `I a ¢,yI l Y i. II ~LJ I ~ ~ I a~ ~~I II 'n 'F - '_ I L~ f III. '~ ~ ~i.l _i.l~~~~i-ax ::.t.~ ~ ~ I ~~I ~ ~~ II '1 J I, ;l~l. ~ ~ j: f° ~: ` III '' I I; I-, ~ {. ~ ~ , I ~ ~~ Ir ~~ ' _ i_ ,I \ % I ; I :I ;; . . II , ,. p. ' , , ~~ ,~ ---~ i ---.. -'-----r - ~~ - ail -_ t•. ~ _--- I •~ ::~ rll:. ~~. ~~~~~~~ J B,C,D,E & F- 36 ~/w~~~ • Proposed Haven Square Retail Center Neighborhood Meeting Agenda Introduction o Project Goals and Objectives Project Team o Lewis Retail Centers o Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market Project Summary o Site Area: 2.90 Acres o Total Leasable Area: 26,884 square feet o Fresh & Easy:13,969squarefeet o 'Shops 1 Building: 12,915 Tenants o Service Related Tenants (Shops 1) o Quick Service Restaurants (Shops 1) o Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Store (Major A) • Site Architecture o Site Layout o Architectural Theme o Fresh & Easy Elevation o Shops 1 Elevation o Site Sustainability (Anticipated Design Features) o Pedestrian Friendly Site o Bicycle Racks " o Preferred Parking for Alternative Vehicles /Car Pooling o Light Pollution Reduction o Drought Tolerant Landscaping o Low Flow Fixtures o Diverting up to 50% of Construction Waste Disposal Project Schedule o Construction Start: 1~` Quarter 2009 o Grand Opening: 3`d Quarter 2009 Q&A • ~~~~~~~ ~ B, C,D,E & F- 37 Lewis Retail Centers a member of the Lewis group of companies 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 Upland, California 91785-0670 909/949-6703 Fax: 909/912-8159 June 16, 2008 DRAFT Subject: Proposed Haven Square Retail Project -Neighborhood Meeting Thursday, June 26, 2008, 6:30 to 7:30 pm To whom it may concern: We cordially invite you to an informational session for our proposed Haven Square retail project to be located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. This session will be held in the Ruth Musser Middle School Multipurpose Room located at 10789 Terra Vista Parkway, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. We welcome this opportunity to inform you of our proposed retail project and look forward to meeting you in person. Sincerely, Luis A. Gomez Director of Retail Project Development • L~ • B, C,D,E & F- 38 • ~ ~sr 5~ 03 &i of a~ ~ d1 ~! yp S i3 .: =i o ~~ a 6[ i S 6 4 4 ~939 3 ~f ~3 9 6 ~ s~ € ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {e p ~SP ~eF ~ i d i J • z 0 w a K Q J z O F x 0 N a O E B,C,D,E & F- 39 z 0 a r 3 a 0 F Z O x O z a 0 W o s x ., Z ~' '$~?d ~e gg.f"-~ 9~~ 'sd a~ $~ ~~§ Q N Z 0 I Q ii w w w w N N L c ~~ E _~ U Va O ~ O~ •~ N •~ N J I~ef~ ~ N o ~3 °' d~ J m W W U U ~~ H dS O Z~ ;U Q U =O x w Z Z ~~ W ~hCK a S ^9 i i v 1'x-`1 ' S W ^tm - m ~ ~~~ m ' ~ ~ bbg b~~~l y$ 9~ggR _ ~ Nn ~ 'e dq I I o d1~i ~l QQQQp p~ ~ 6 e A [ „_ 3 e- t B u y i4 ~ ' a $ x S1 ~ r s m .~ ~ ~ o ~ = a= a 6~ ~m ~ g ~ a@ %? q q ~q g 6 F _ ~o k °` E ~ 1 .;'( ~ p! ~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~ E 8. 7 P ° ~3~b _ ~ ~~aH ~L a k9 ° ~e tt ~ 7 ~d6ap ~ Eg~~S d~ i ' ° ~ ~~ $~ m ao~o c~ ~~ s Ft e ~ ° qf f q 7EIEe@ ~ E ~ a E v i 9m u g 8a ~ ~~ F ~4 ~ <d 9r ia16e ~ / I ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ;::.,, ,, T, ~, ~. .~ u.-;,,,,...,.,.~.,.~.~ ,~...,~ w ~• x i- I . S _ ` E ` °'' I tY R i~ ip? ? EI ~ ~ '~h~' FBI a ~~ j 3 d :; O^ 1 I ' aa~ - - -'G. ~~ ~ i _ _ ._ i ~ ® L II s t _ _ .. ~ ~ ~ i ` r _ ° ° I ~ i ° _„ ,° ~ r„~~~ c m z ~ E Q r ~ J ~ 30 w OU u~ ,tj of c ~ ~ E ~ Z O _ = V -~ o U W W ~ ~ ~~ i • u B, C,D,E & F- 40 • S S ~~ 4b c m (n m N N O 0 L O d m Z m • ~ c d m K d (0 Q C m S m 0 0 a u v` 'o .~ w v . - ~ ~1 ~ r ~I 1~ I J v J' ~ w ~ ~~ ~ V ~ I N M VV i ~ ~I ~ ~ I a ~ __._- ~~ - ~ ~__ ~_._. _ . i , _._ L_.. I ~___. I i' 3 ~ ~ I I N vi I a . ~ h ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i j I ~ , ---~ ---~- -- --~ - - -- -- --- ~ - --t --~ -- " Ta I ~~' z i, ~~ ~ I i i I I ! ~ I I I ! ~ i I ~ ~ : ; ~ ! i l .~ ~ I 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ __ ' I i ~ j I i ~~ ~ ~ I ' i ~. . ~ I i I i I i I ' I I ~ Z __ r _. NT M~ V ~ O -__ n _ ` W ____ OJ O L r - r ~ ~ ._.. I M r __{~ C'I r~ ~ N~ r .~ ~(p _. _ I~ r .....~. W r __ _.i m~ rl "" ~. O~ NI . - i. N ._ _~. N. N _. _ ~ M. N~ _ V' N B, C,D,E & F- 41 Proposed Haven Square Retail Center Neighborhood Meeting Agenda • Public Comments Mr Beiter 1. What is being done to minimize parking lot light into neighboring residential areas? 2. Is the site designed to allow for proper delivery truck access? 3. Will Fresh & Easy utilize condensate generated by the refrigerant to irrigate landscape areas? Responses 1. Lighting standards will be kept to a maximum height of 20 feet and will utilize reflective shields as necessary to minimize light reflection. 2. Yes. The site has been designed to allow full truck turning capability throughout. 3. No. However, landscaping will consist of drought tolerant landscape to minimize water consumption. • • B,C,D,E & F- 42 ENVIRONMENTAL • - INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City o/Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move /rom one line to the next line.) Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; Clty staff will nol be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Pro/ectTitle Fountain Glen /Haven Square Name & Address of protect owner(sp Church Haven Company, LLC 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 Name & Address of developer orproject sponsor Lewis Community Developers 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 • Contact Person & Address Fountain Glen: Garth Chambers, Lewis Planned Communities 1 \PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 1 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 "~f"f I~f ~ ~ B, C,D,E & F- 43 Haven Square: Luis Gomez, Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Ave. Upland, CA 91785 Name & Address of person preparing this form (~f different from above) Linn Linn & Associates 826 Molino Ave. Telephone Number. Planning Consultants ong Beach, CA 90804 562-433-9444 • 2) 3) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the noRh, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location o/each photograph. Project Location (describe) Generally located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street in the Terra Vista Planned Community of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga. 4) Assessors Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary)., 1077-422-01, 1077-422- 46, 1077-422-94 • `5) Gross Site Area (aclsq. ff ). 14.72 acres *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed 14,72 acres dedications): 7) Descnbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet tf necessary): The project is a proposal for approval for a General Plan Amendment, Community Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, and Tentative Parcel Map as described in the project narrative attached. 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the C/ty ofRancho Cucamonga and othergovernmental I'\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Imhal Study PaA1 docPage 2 of 10 Rev. 3/17104 B, C,D,E & F- 44 Information indicated by an asterisk () is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. "1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundades agencies rn order to fully implement the project. General Plan Amendment, Community Plan Amendment, Conditional Usc Permit (commercial uses), Tentative Parcel Map. 9) Descnbe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use o(the structures. Attach photographs ofsignificant features described. In addition, cite all sources o/information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The project site is bounded on the north by Church Street, on the south by Town Center Drive, on the east by Terra Vista Parkwa}S and on the west by Haven Avenue. -Ihe project sire is relatively Aat and concains no significant plants or animal species. The project site is transected by the Deer Creek Channel, a San Bernardino County Flood Control District facility. An existing automobile service station is located at the noaheast corner oEHaven Avenue and Town Center Drive and will be incorporated into the proposed project. Existing residential, • community commercial, and office park uses are located adjacent to the project sire. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cde all sources of rnformaton (books, published reports and oral history). The site has been previously graded and there are no known cultural and/or historical resources within the project site. • I:\PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inilial Study Parl7.docPage 3 of 70 Rev 3/77/04 B, C,D,E & F- 45 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and Prow they will affect proposed uses: (See attachment) 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary' Refer ro the Project Summary for the General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment included as part of this application. • 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): (See attachment) 14) lMll the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project (See attachment) • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B,C,D,E & F- 46 11) The existing noise environment includes traffic noise,'predominandy generated from Church Street, • Haven Avenue, Terra Vista Parkway, Town Center Drive, and other local streets in the project vicinity. Ontario International Airport is located approximately 3 miles (mi) southwest of the project si[e. Aircraft takeoffs and landings at the airport contribute intermittently to the ambient noise in the project vicinity. Aircraft noise does not result in any significant noise impacts on the project site. A noise study has been prepared and submitted as part of the projecc application evaluating existing noise impacts to the project site, po[ential noise impacts associated with implementalion of [he project and recommended mitigation measures for the project. Existing traffic noise impacting the project site originates from mocor vehicles and is generated by engine vibrations, interaction between tires and the road, and exhaust systems. Haven Avenue, Town Center Drive, Terra Visa Parkway, Church Street, and other local streets compose the dominant source of traffic noise contributing to ambient levels in the project vicinity. The Federal HighwayAdminisuation (FH WA) highway traffic noise prediction model (FHWA I2D-77-108) was • used to evaluate highway traffic-related noise conditions in the project vicinity 17tis model requires various parameters, including traffic volumes, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry to compute typical equivalent noise levels during daytime, evening, and nighttime hours. This screening-level traffic noise model assumes that the noise sources and receptor (contour) locations are at the same level, and provides the distance to the noise contour without any intervening structure. Based on past experience with traffic noise projections using this model, the projected noise levels using "soft site" conditions have been close to the calibrated noise measurement results; therefore, no calibration is necessary for every model run at this screening level analysis. For a more site-specific, detailed analysis with known receptor locations, the calibration can be done with noise measurement and concurrent traffic count. Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volume along Church Street, Haven Avenue, Town Centet Drive, Terra Vista Parkway, and Broadmoor Place are listed in Table D of the noise analysis prepared for the project site. The resultant noise levels are weighted and summed over 24-hour periods to determine the Ldn values. As shown in Table D, traffic noise along the roadway segments in the project vicinity is moderate ro high, with the 60 and 65 dBA Ldn traffic noise contours extending beyond the roadway right-of--way for most roadway • segments. "Ihe 70 dBA Ldn contour extends beyond the roadway right-of--way only along the Haven Avenue segments evaluated. B,C,D,E & F- 47 13) The project site is bounded by commercial and office park uses on the east and south, single family and multi-family residential uses on the north, and residential and office uses on the west. Due to • the nature of the surrounding existing developed areas, there are no known significant plants or animals located within the vacant areas adjacent to the project site and no known cultural, historical, or scenic aspects associated with the vacant areas adjacent to [he project site. Plant, animal, cultural, historical, and scenic aspects of the adjacent properties developed with office, community commercial, and residential uses have been previously evaluated as part of the project approval process by the City for these developments and any impac[s iu these areas have been mitigated with development of these areas. 14) The proposed project will not change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project. Residen[ial uses of a density and type consistent with residential uses located north of the project site are planned iri the northerly portion of the project site adjacent to existing residential uses. The existing Deer Creek Channel serves as a physical buffer between existing office uses located on the west side of Haven Avenue adjacent to [he project site. The planned commercial uses for the project site are compatible with the existing office park and community commercial land uses located adjacent to the • project site on the east and south. B, C,D,E & F- 48 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these nose levels affect ad/acent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? • The short term and long reran noise impaccs associated with the project, and the recommended mitigation measures for the project have been evaluated in the "Noise Impact Analysis" dated February 2008 prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. for the Fountain Glen project and submitted to the City as part of the project application. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: The projecc sire has been graded per a previous design and does not include the removal and/or replacement of any mature or scenic trees. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drams: The site will drain directly into an existing 36 inch storm drain located in Town Center Drive which drains to Deer Creek Channel. • 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Vatley Water Distract at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) 41,472 gallons per day b Commereial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 4082 gallons per tenant per day 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic lank Q Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected dally sewage generation: (SeeAttachmentAforusageestimates). For furtherclarification,pleasecontaclthe Cucamonga Valley Water Distract at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 30,780 gallons pct day b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) 5,491 gallons per day RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 162 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size. Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 162 attached condominium for sale units. • I.\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitial Study Partl.docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 B,C,D,E & F- 49 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents. To be Sale Price(s) $ determined to $ • Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: To be determined 23) Indtcate anticipated household size by urnt type: qhe proposed projec[ will be an age restricted residential development with an anticipated two persons per household per unit. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be rending within the project Contact the appropriate School Dtsthcts as shown ~n Attachment B: a. Elementary. The proposed project is an age restricted retirement b Junior High: community and school age children are not permitted to reside within the project. c. Senior High • COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: A major anchor store such as a grocery store is anticipated on one parcel and smaller in-line tenants will be sought for amulti-tenan[ building located on dte second parcel. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 26,884 square feet of retail commercial and service commercial use. 27) Indicate hours of operation: Normal hours of operation, ^o "after how's" operation proposed. 28) Numberofemployees: To be determined after tenants are identified. Total: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: . I'\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Sludy Partl.docPage 6 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 B,C,D,E & F- 50 29) Provide breakdown ofanticipated/ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet i/necessary): • To be identified after identification of tenants. To be identified after identification 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the Crty. of [enants. '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the Soulh Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): 'Ihe primary source and amount of air pollution emissions will be from automobile traffic to and from the residential development and commercial center. Overall amounts of emissions generated from the residential componen[ of the proposed development project are anticipated to be reduced due to the proximity of commercial retail uses and commercial services located within walking distance to the residences. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the projectbeen contacted to determine lheirability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. Water, sewer, fire and control agencies serving the project will be contacted as part of the City's review of the tentative parcel map and tentative tract map applications and will provide comments regarding their respective areas of jurisdiction to provide service to the project. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe them use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. There has been no historical use of the vacant portion of the project site for storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. The operations of the existing automobile service station located within the boundaries of the project site include the storage and handling of fuck, oils, and solvents in a manner consistent with the conditions of approval adopted by the Ciry as part of the conditional approval of the service station. • I'\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitiai Study Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev. 3/17!04 B,C,D,E & F- 51 34) VYII the proposed pro/ect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, or discharge olhazardous and/or toxic materials, includmg but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and • labeled on the application plans. The proposed project includes the continued operation of the existing automobile service station located within the project site. Service station operations are regulated by the conditions of approval adopted by the Ciry as part of its conditional approval of the service station. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this pro/ect. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissioNPlanning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this pro/ect to the best ofmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: April 25, 2008 Signature: Title: Linn & Associates l J J ~,Iy~-~, Debby Linn I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 8 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 B,C,D,E & F- 52 ATTACHMENT"A" • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usaae Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows • Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Ptan 2000 • I.\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inilial Study Partl.docPage 9 of 10 B, C,D,E & F- 53 Rev. 3/17/04 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees. Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontano, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partt.docPage 10 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 u • B,C,D,E & F- 54 General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment Project Summary ' Project Overview Lewis Community Developers is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Community Plan Amendrnent for the proposed Fountain Glen residential and Haven Square commercial development project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment are submitted by Lewis Community Developers for an approximately 14.72 gross acre site located within the Terra Vista Community Plan azea at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street as illustrated in Exhibit 1, "General Plan Amendment Map." 'Ihe GPA is a request to amend the General Plan land use map cbanging the General Plan land use designation for the site from Office [o Residential Medium High Densit}' and Neighborhood Commercial. the Community Plan Amendment application is a request to amend the Terra Vista Community Plan land use map changing the planning district designation for the site from Office Park (OP) to Residential Medium High Density (MI-I) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and to delete the designation of a bus stop at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Strcct. The L''xisting General Plan land use designation and "Coning/Community Plan designations for the project site are illustrated on Exhibit 2, "Existing General Plan and Zoning/Community Plan Designation." The pro- posed General Plan land use designation and Zoning/Community Plan designation for the project site are illustrated on Exhibit 3, "Proposed General Plan Land Use and Community Plan Designation." 'Ihe Fountain Glen project is a proposal for development of approximately 11.83 acres of the project site as an age re- stricted condominium communit}' Within a park like setting providing active recreational amenities for residents and lo- cated within walking distance to a new retail and service commercial center of approximately 2.89 acres. The Fountain Glen community will address the market needs of active residents with provision of active recreational facilities and an on-site pedestrian and bicycle circulation system connecting residences to recreational facilities and planned new com- mercial services. Residents will be able to walk or bike to a centrally located multi-purpose community building, bar- beque and picnic area facilities, gardens for informal gatherings, a bocce ball court, and a putting green. Exclusive pe- destrian and bicycle access will be provided between the commercial center and residences offering opportunities for residents [o walk or bike to shopping and services. LAND USE SUMMARY APPROXIMATE AREA Commercial Center 2.89 acres Residential Area 11 .83 acres Total 14.72 acres Residential Summary Total Dwelling Units 162 Residential Density 13.69 du/acre • B, C,D,E & F- 55 Residential Uses Residential uses are planned on approximately 11.83 acres of the project site. Development of up to 162 residential condominium units at a density of 13.69 dwelling units per acre is proposed. Residential units will be for sale condo- miniums to meet the needs of active adults within an age-restricted community. A mix of one bedroom, two bedroom, and dual master bedroom residential condominium units are planned ranging in size from approximately 982 square feet to 1,550 square feet with an average unit size of 1,290 square feet. ~mcnities Recreational and open space amenities are planned for Fountain Glen within walking distance to all residences. Recreational and open space amenities planned for development as part of the residential component of Fountain Glen include: • AMulti-purpose community facility • Large open lawn areas and garden areas for informal gatherings • Barbeque and picnic for group gatherings • A putting green • A bocce ball court Commercial Uses 'Ihe Haven Square commercial center of approximately 2b,8S4 square feet on approximately 2.89 acres is planned con- currently with the Fountain Glen project. Haven Square will provide a site for a major anchor tenant, such as a grocery store, and a site for amulti-tenant building containing smallei specialty shops and persona] service businesses. 'Ilte location of Haven Square immediately adjacent to the Fountain Glen residential use offers opportunities for resi- dents to walk or bike to shopping and services. Safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access points will be pro- vided along the boundary between Haven Square and Fountain Glen to encourage walking and biking within the community. ' Surrounding Land Usc Fountain Glen and Haven Square are bounded by the following land uses. North: Existing medium density residential use. South: Existing community commercial uses. East: Existing office park uses. West: Existing commercial and residential uses. .~~ 'ku~f~. ".~...t~y-._ars '+t`'~"~.-'~~s. t'~e ~ 4.r~r>~ ~ .~ r {JNN¢;2008 :2 ..'..;, +~~33. `~`-.'may _ . ~ , • B,C,D,E & F- 56 v^I :ti~~F~ _~. _ .. ~:: ;'":mil i"F4 ~,.~'s~t '`..`. • Land Use Compatibility Approval by the City of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment will lead to de- velopment of a project that is compatible with surrounding existing and planned land uses. The pattern of land uses within the area of the project site includes existing medium density residential development, existing commercial office development, and existing commercial land uses. 'lhe proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment include a request to change the land use designation of approximately 2.89 acres within the project site from Office Park to Neighborhood Commercial. This 2.89 acre portion of the project site is located north of and adjacent to existing commercial land uses. The Terra Vista Community Plan describes the intent for Neighborhood Commercial areas as providing sites for mazkets, drug stores, Laundromats, dry cleaners, and other neighborhood shops and services. Locations of neighborhood commercial cen- ters should be easily accessible by automobile from all parts of Terra Vista via the loop parkway, while offering exposure to residents in adjoining communities. Neighborhood commercial centers should be located neaz the extensions of the greenwa}' system for easy access on foot and by bicycle. The location of the proposed neighborhood commercial center offers easy vehicular and bicycle access from Town Center Drive. Direct pedestrian access is provided to the proposed neighborhood center for residents of Fountain Glen, and pedestrian and bicycle access to the neighborhood center is available to surrounding residents from the greenway system located in Terra Vista Parkway near the neighborhood center and from the pedestrian walkway in Town Center Drive. Uses envisioned for development within the planned 2.89 acre commercial center include a gro- cerystore and specialty stores offering goods and services to the planned Fountain Glen residential community, the sur- rounding existing residential community, and the existing and planned office park complexes within proximity to the • project site. Approval by the City of the request to change the General Plan and Community Plan land use designa- tion for this area to Neighborhood Commercial will meet the intent of the Neighborhood Commercial land use des- ignation and maintain land use compatibility with the existing and planned pattern of land use within Terra Vista and the surrounding area. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment includes a request to change the land use designation of approximately 11.83 acres within the project site from Office Park to Residential Medium High Density. This 11.83 acre portion of the project site is located south of and adjacent to an existing residential medium density de- velopment located north of Church Street and southwest of an existing single family residential development located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Haven Avenue.'Ihe Terra Vista Community Plan describes the Residential Medium High Density land use category as including single family detached and attached home types, townhomes, garden apartments, and condominiums at a density range of 14-24 dwelling units per acre. The location of the 11.83 acre portion of the project site adjacent to Haven Avenue at the periphery' of the Terra Vista community and adjacent to existing medium density residential development located north of Church Street estab- lishes the site as a suitable location for Residential Medium High Density development in accordance with the cri- teria of the Terra Vista Community Plan. Approval by the City to change the land use designation for this area to a Residential Medium I-Iigh Density land use designation would permit development of a residential condominium project of approximately' 13.69 dwelling units per acre consistent with the density level established for the existing resi- dential area located north of Church Street. Designating this area for Residential Medium I-Iigh Density development will maintain land use compatibility and consistency within the immediate vicinity of the project site and will maintain a compatible pattern of land use within the Terra Vista community and the surrounding area. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Community Plan Amendment include a request for approval to delete • the designation of a bus stop at the southwest corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway. Omni Trans, the local public transit service provider, has indicated that a bus stop in this location is not needed. B, C,D,E & E- 57 I-+-r-ITS-~ ; ~ N %/~~r~~y >. ~ y~~1 -7 r1-~--(j 7~-~ I i % h~7 w \n ~\ ~~ TT \~ -- -"_- ~~~ ;; T III 07rFa: I ; I ~ I I ; couumaa. I J III ~ Nu~r~~'AUar i; I I i i i~l / I SgaFlC Pld/1 '/ - ~ I (~~) / / ~ / \ I' / \~ / /` / x t~/ / ~- 11 ---~1 ~ ~ ( p I y0 I ~ \ ' CONM aAL~ ~ ! `\ 1 ~ ~ r--- I I I I \~~ I I i J it L ~.` ~~ QU ~Ii wSCAIE n FEET WIE' RNYIi IPY, }GYA9 I ,~pTd6G l sranav --~ I - I --~I -L 11 Exhibit 1 General Plan Amendment Map ti.., ,. ' I„a, err I rr~sno+naL ~ :. ~ ~~ \`~ I ` ~ I ~, \\ \` /) ~ ` \ \~ ~} ~~ ~ ~ ~ ` -/~}7EE PARK ~ ~ ~//~~~ \ ~/ / / / ~\\ I ' ' // %/~ I i~C~~ '4y~ I ~ .~ a1NNUNxY `~ l carNmaAL \\ (~) \;.. r J °~ I \, -~------J _ ,~ /~ / . \ ' \ ~ i .; • HnSE LINE RONH ~ W 9 ¢ ~ y3 JlSZP ~WPRKVAT > ~apP CNU~N STRELi PROD CT SIT Ro~ICINITYMAP • Nar ro scuc °E~ ~ r _... 0.r, ~a~~s ii~f '~'~vx`~~ W~ !~ _ se 1 /: 2'551. Lx~.:~-._: B, C,D,E & F- 58 w s, OFFICE \ ~~~ ~~~ FOOTHILL BLV I~--. Source: Terra Virta Community Plan Exhibit 2 Existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning/ Community Plan Designation t .p. ,,;'S~ c~ a4c v'.A ~'~-gk°aii~u M`"`i~~s B, C,D,E & F- 59 ~,M$'--".',', ,tom: ~ _ , ~~ ~~",. ~~ • w FOOTHILL BLV I~! Source: Terra Virta Community Plan Exhibit 3 Proposed General Plan Land Use and Zoning/Community Plan Designation • B,C,D,E & F- 60 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163 2. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18608, Development Review DRC2008-00162, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00451 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the General Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts • for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to change the Terra Vista Community Plan land use designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan and located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 -LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District generally located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive in the Terra Vista Community - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related • Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B,C,D,E & F- 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 2 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Luis Gomez, Director of Retail Project Development Lewis Retail Centers 1156 N. Mountain Avenue PO Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 5. General Plan Designation: Office Space 6. Zoning: Office Park (OPK) -Terra Vista Community Plan 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is located at the south west corner of Haven and Church and is characterized by Multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter and perimeter landscaping since that time. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Larry Henderson, Principal Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: ' CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM10 -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G URBEMIS2007-Urban Emissions Mode12007 • • B, C,D,E & F- 62 • J Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Aesthetics (x) Agricultural Resources (x) Air Quality ()Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x)_Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () TransportationlTraffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed protect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to', by the protect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. O I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions .or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By' Reviewed By: ~~J~t` ~~1 Date: 2 ~ Date: 2 D B, C,D,E & F- 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC200S-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 4 Less Than Sigmhcanl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Pptan,iauy Sgm4cant wnh Mitlgatlon Than Signlhcant Np Impact IOCOIpOIat¢tl ImpaC~ ImpaC~ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? • Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-16. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Otfice Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or O O (/) O, Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? • B,C,D,E & F- 64 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 5 Less Tnan Significant Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fpfenfially Sgnihcanf wan MLLigatipn Tnan Sipndicant No Im act Inver aratetl Impact Impact Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven and Church and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was grade as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was grade as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. The nearest active agricultural use is more than 2.34 miles north east from the protect site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? B, C,D,E & F- 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC200 8-00 1 60/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 6 ' Less Than Sigml¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Fplamially Sigm6cam wpm Mitigation roan Significant No Ifnp8L1 nCelpplatatl n1paC1 nlpdcl Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. According to the Air Quality Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, dated February 2008, "The proposed project is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, which is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and SCAQMD AQMP. In addition, the proposed project will not exceed the SCAQMD's long-term growth projections and emission thresholds. Therefore, implementation of the project will not conflict with the AQMP, and no significant impacts will result." See page 21 of the above referenced study for the technical analysis of the ARB model Urban Emissions Model 2007 (URBEMIS2007) which used the higher emissions for each criteria pollutant during summer or winter and assumes all stationary source emissions are from mixed-uses. As shown, the project would not exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) daily emission thresholds in the year analyzed, and therefore, the projects impact is less-than-significant and no mitigation measures are required. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty • construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the SCAQMD on a protect-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAG?MD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. B,C,D,E & F- 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 7 CJ Less Than Sign,OCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potenuany sigmhcanl wen Mivgavon man Sgml,cant No Im act Incorporated I act Im act 4) All asphalt shall meet o'r exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds ' (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted fn the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxide (Nox), Reactive Organize Gases (ROG). and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse • impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 B, C,D,E & F- 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 8 Less Tnan Signdsant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Ppfe"f,auy Sigmi¢ant w"" MiOgallon T°°° Sign111Canl NC Impact Incorporafetl Impact Impact of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. • After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. According to the Air Quality Analysis prepared by LSA Associates, dated February 2008, "The proposed protect is consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, which is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and SCAQMD AQMP. In addition, the proposed project will not exceed the SCAQMD's long-term growth projections and emission thresholds. Therefore, implementation of the project will not conflict with the AQMP, and no significant impacts will result:' d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety . Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. B, C,D,E & F- 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 9 Less TM1an Significam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fmenbauy Signdicant win Ma,ga~on than SIgDIfICdDI No Ingatl DCOfpDlatetl rt'pa<t mDdCI e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ' e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south, and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. • b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. B, C,D,E & F- 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 10 Less IDan SignlLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pp~enually SpniLCant with Maigaoon Than Sipndicanl No Impact Incomoraied Irtpact Impap c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are aniiclpated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • B, C,D,E & F- 70 Initial Study for .City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 11 Less Tpan ' S,gmLCam less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 PoienLauy s~9nd,pan~ w,m Meiga~,pn rnan signn,canf Np Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resources (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered • before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The prolect site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding • developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner B,C,D,E & F- 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pp g Fo~en~iauv Significam wnn Mit,gation man Sgmhcant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red HIII Fault, passes within 79 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3.65 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes, is 10.4 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to M„, 8.2 earthquakes, is 13.3 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during • • • B, C,D,E & F- 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 13 Less Than SgmLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fptenuauy SignJicant w~tn Mivgaaon rnan SgrnLCant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1), The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to • reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of TvB Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the protect site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically Loamy Sand. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. • 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? B,C,D,E & F- 73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 14 Less Than SigrnLCant less Issues and Su ortrn Information Sources: PP g Pptaneaov sgnnicant. Wilh Muigaeon Than $igniLCant No Impact Incorporated Im ad Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a signiticant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal. approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed commercial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each business license for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. t~ • c) There are schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 16 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. Typically, the uses proposed do not • create obtectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not B,C,D,E & F- 74 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 15 Less Than 51gn111Cap( Less Issues and Su orfin Information Sources: PP g Pmentizlly SigniLCant wm, MrtigaLOn rhap Sigmhcant No lnpdCl nCO O(atetl aCt fllPaCf reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. u • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the pro/ect: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) B, C,D,E & F- 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 16 Less Than sigm6cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Poran~ianr S,gmhcant wpm Mhigation Than si9ndicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) u Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The protect is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. • Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Construction Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction protect discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. • Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention B, C,D,E & F- 76 ~• Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 17 Less Than Signd,cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pnfamially S,gn,6cant w,m MiUgaoon Than Sign,hcanf No Im aM ncp~ Omtetl m aC1 Impact basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: t) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern • California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as saridbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) See other specific BMPs from the WOMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, on-file in the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of • two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. B,C,D,E & F- 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 18 Less Than Sipnificam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pe1en+~ally Signdicam wnn Mibgavpn rnan Slpnil¢am No Impact Inver ora,etl I act Impact b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor well it Interfere with recharge because It is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact Is not considered significant. \J d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape • proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, Increase in runoff from the site will not result In flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary Increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting In surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development • and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. B,C,D,E & F- 78 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 19 Less Ttlan Signn,cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pptenualty SpmLCant W,itl MitpaLOn Ttlan SigmLCant No Impact Incomoratetl Impact Impad 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. • j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street and is characterized by multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, commercial retail to the south and commercial and vacant office designated land to the west. The site was graded as part of the Terra Vista Planned Community approximately 20 years • ago and the perimeter was improved with street, curb and gutter, and perimeter landscaping since that time. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding multi-family development to the north, Institutional/Office Park to the east, and commercial retail development to the south. The protect will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. B,C,D,E & F- 79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 20 Less Tian SigniLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Foienaal~y sgmbcam wun Mmpanon maa Signiimam No IrtpaCl InCOrppratetl Irtpact Impact b) The project site land use designation is currently Office. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan as proposed to be amended and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City • General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • B, C,D,E & F- 80 u Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 21 Less Than Signtlsant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 amenuafly SiBmhcant w~fn Mnigalmn roan Sigrv4cant No Irtgact Incomomtatl Impact Impact Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. A Noise Study was prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008, and the following Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting of walls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2008. Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met. b) ,The uses associated with this type of protect normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. • d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building and Safety Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: • 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer B,C,D,E & F- 81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 22 Less Than SiBmhcant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Potenaally S~gnA¢am w,tn MitiBapon Tnan SigruM1Cant No ' Impact Inco~poratetl Impact Impact shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. Located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, Is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The prolect is located growth. Construction employees to the area. employees; hence, will employees will likely be are anticipated. in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No impacts b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? O O U (/) • • • B,C,D,E & F- 82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 23 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pofanuauy Significant w"" Millgauon rnan SigniLCant N° Im act Incorp°ratetl Impact Impact Comments: a) The site, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, would be served by a fire station located approximately 1.19 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) Central School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located .27 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in • the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any exfsting facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase the demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. ~- 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and O O O (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or O O O (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? B,C,D,E & F- 83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2 008-00 1 60/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 24 Less Than - SigniLCarn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pmant,auy SgniOCant wnn MdigaOOn rnan Sgntl¢ant Np Im act Incorppratetl Impact Impact Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located .27 mile from the project site. This prolect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a)response above. 15. TRANSPORTATIONlTRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? ' b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? O O O (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs O O O (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? J u Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed prolect will generate 1,705 new vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 162 age-restricted apartments and two retail buildings of approximately 26,884 square feet. The Traffic Study by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2008, estimates that the project will generate 40 trips during a.m. peak hour and 84 trips during p.m. hour for a net of 1,705 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included ~n the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. In addition, the City has established a Transportation • Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of bwlding permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. B, C,D,E & F- 84 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 25 • Less Than Srgnrircant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Petant,ally Sgmfrcanl wah MrtrgaLOn Tnan S,gnrOCanf No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The Traffic Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 12, 2008, estimates that the project will generate 40 trips during a.m. peak hour and 84 trips during p.m. hour for a net of 1,705 trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permits. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The protect will not negatively impact the level of-service standards on adjacent arterials. The protect will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 3.64 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The protect is in an area that is mostly developed. The project already has street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along all the street frontages of the site. The protect design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. • The protect will, therefore, not create a substantialincrease in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are antfcipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the O O O (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facflities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm O O O (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from exfsting entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? B, C,D,E & F- 85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 26 Less Than SigniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 'pren"ally SigniLCant w"" MmgaOOn Than signJmant No Impact Incorporatetl Im act I ect e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficent permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency ai the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. • b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board • regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building and Safety Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The protect is served by the CVW D water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. • B, C,D,E & F- 86 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 27 u • Less Than Signd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pglenoally s~gndmant w~ln M6igavon Tnan SignO¢ant No Impact Incpmoratetl Impact Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mator periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future protects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings; either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed protect were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan as amended. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use protects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies • construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with B, C,D,E & F- 87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 28 less Than Signilicam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Polenpally sBmhcem wnh M,ogauon rnan Signd¢ant No Impact InCpfpOlaled Irtpact Impact the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Terra Vista Planned Community EIR (SCH #81082808, certified February 16, 1983) • (x) Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan dated June 23, 2008, by Madole & Associates, Inc. • (x) Traffic Study -Mobile Marriott Mixed Use, LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 12, 2008. (x) Air Quality Analysis -Terra Vista Fountain Glen, by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008. (x) Noise Impact Analysis -Terra Vista Fountain Glen, by LSA Associates, Inc. dated February 2008. • B,C,D,E & F- 88 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161/SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 Page 29 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: /~ ~_ Date: ~/~~//~ Print Name and Title: D f (-!lG~DK. Df'- P/'b jec~` ~~e ~o~fYl~v~-- Llc.t~ ~. • C-~om~-~ u B, C,D,E & F- 89 • :. City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2008-00160, DRC2008-00161, SUBTPM18797, AND DRC2008-00163 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 B, C,D,E & F- 91 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM D RC2008-00160/DRC2008-00161 /SUBTPM18797/DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEV ELOPERS August 28, 2008 • Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refiriement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. • 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or otherforms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the Cityto retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • B,C,D,E & F- 92 u • u r a 0 L~ r N J a_ H Z .... H J Y U W U Z_ CZ G Z Q > O N C ~ N N H Y r N fD ~ O Q O N ~ ~ ^ E~ a .a ~ U dg a E ~ c Qo 0 N _R N d 1 U c ~ ~ ~ _ C C ~ L E ~ J G ~, _ ~ N ~ d N ~ R a Q c d m E oaf 0 y ~ N ~ ~ a :r C C ml U C ~ d ~ Z ~ J d LLL ~ C w ~ R ~ ~ V ~ R! Q as #~ v v a t~ b' N N a N N y,~ ~~; t~ ~~ . x s U U U U a U a a a N c In ~ y y m N c a m m a. a o_ a a a;5~ O O O O O 3 ro . 3 ro 3 ro 3 m 3 a~ :~ , . ~.. ~ " U U U m U r,-it s~ rH-~~ t` "d r'i O m ~ ~i*~,~*,"' e D ~ D F d a a m m ~~„Fr~!~ ~ 'O - - 'O N ~ ro O T'p O C (~ C T T ro - ~ `~ 'p ~ O rn -O .f , te' : t C C L O N O .- ~ O L N O O U O - ..- U O '> .U 3 d 'U ro U N N ~ -O T (6 ~ L to S , . `'`~' ~„ _ C ro N N O O p i~ p d O C ~ ~ O Q y L U ro gy -' ~ O ~ .~ N d N ro ~ co~a~~o ro~ L°L'OQn o~~ o Lro ~ '^~ C U C >` N '~ D) (6 (6 N L ~ C RS N cC L (6 3 C O ~~ 9 L`a~a~o m°-ocE ~V ~O -U'a a °~a y~'. -_ O N O) U 'O ro .- T` L O O E O M L C d RS ~ - G. r'An~ ` ro C ro_ U L O C C p (n U' C O w 'O ro p O O f0 ~ N '.- C ~ ,zZ „,~_ w O N y m V L C L '- ro C p CO ~~~ C O Q _ N ro N v 0 _ _ h~ ^a "ts"i;" C (` to N y j O~ 'O V N N O~« (n 0I C0 9 N x ~ y C Q > - E ~ O y` N- C _ _ O O O O ~ "• ~,.~ N C E o ~ w '6 O T N ^~ o in ~ m .o to , ( /~ m a or o~ E a tt. M u~`F ~ .acoE~aU p c~ac3 ~m-o ~~ y °roy°~ ACC °-~"~m ~~ .r^ ~.r.~, '?ia~~ o o a o N -~ N .O- ~ ro oooro ~ o_ ro ~ N a U- ~ y in a m a C C o E~ o c ~ 7. 4,s,~ ~ p c ~c roNL~~3a Ec`m op~ NQ roo >.: ~ .U=. N O~ C O L- C C O O N Q1 ~' ~ c "o E ._ uUi i N N L ' ~~~ in ~ p ` C C ` ~ O Q ~ 4J U O m U ~ Q1 ~ E .C ro N ? E L C ' to V H~ ~ ~ ~~ m o o W o- o. aci a N~ 'm m e O oa `o N° °. a ~ o m a ~ 'lf O~ C ,~ N C ~~ .~ a .= O C N N ro C L ~ U N 7 O O ~ ,'-;Qg U E~ U Q O N 0- -O -O N O O S U E w a Q d d L Q Q CC S ~,u,u,t n r- ya 0 T a N N N N V V V V d' ~ V ' a a a a ~ Q Q Q a fn N N N fn ~ y ro o ro n ro n ro a ro o 0 0 C 0 0 ro °- . . 4 `0 0 0 `o o '~ ~ o ° ~ ~ o 3 3 ~ 3 3 o~ 2 m 2 m .. ~.. m 2 m 2 ~ i a . a i . a i . a i . i a . C y C y ` t/1 C y ` y ~ ~ ro ~ N ) N ) UI ~ N C O C ~ C O O C p C O N CC ~ CC ~ CC O D v O D U D U O D U O O U fL U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m O ~ O ~ 0 0 C_ a J a U~ ~ C L ' L ~ ' N~ O L ~ a T C_ L ro N a C O ~~~ C N UJ ~ j a N C O ~ . t/J ~ j ro 3 =' 0 0 O a C U~ U N C ° . ~ Q E o ~°' mm ~°.~~. N ~~ coo pmp ~~~ ~ 0 '- O _ >` ~ 0 O L N h y N .` O C ro - O y ' O~ U h d C U R o E" m° o U o 3 6 m o. OC7._ E ¢ o o c ro m ~ 9~ -a t0~ Ea ro o ~-o" E so ~U m a._ i `m¢ a U~ U° ~ °'- m a~ c O m L U- O _ s ro c ro p ro N L ro ro O) ro (n CL o o ~>> _ O N ~ O N O ~~ N to N O O C ~ C t~ S] y _ 3 T~~ 9 U L N 3 'y c°- Nro m~ v~ro°oa ~~rc ro ~ ~ro~o ~ a~ _ ~ ~ 4 = ° ° a i _ ' m ~' ~ °' > ~ ° ro C ~ O C O N U a E ~ ~ U C t O N ~ _ a N E B .~ ~ L 3 a ~ N -_ O ro E y _ N a O ~ ` C O ~ O ro' O ~ N L d N N C O E a N y a O ' a O . O N N . O O N p~ O ~~ N C O p E 6l Q ~ 16 ~ a ro Q 0 Q a O Q .~ ~ N~ N S U N o a U U~ o o O~ o N E ` ~ N U ro~ "`~ `~ U vi n U a m c c ~ a> ya -0 0 N a o oc 0 m > ~ ~O ro m C d ro ` Oro ro 00 N~ ro j yY~ U„ oZ ro p o~pv > Eo UQ a~cro._ U C N ro~-_o - c m om o'er m c pjO ~m 3n = ~`~m> aaxi~ o ~ ~ ` .no~r o~Omu) ~~cN o Uo a ~o can o ~UVi ro o ,--~ ~ ro a¢ _ oro E _ro d= ro' _ ca o a ~ ~ xa mo oa~ ~mmo go m ~o,_ E~ ~ ~~ ro m m o . ~ _=E." ~'U .a~p m~E No~~c3 'ot°' o ~~ . roL o ~ ~~ a a oroo m cam N ~2a~ N iia~ °m ^ 2 ~ ~ a> ti ~ i o a no ~ ~r o ~ti O Qa c - m .°~~ m v ~ rom~~ c ~L m t o cLi °_`o m o m 3 E o ~ cU _ ro~~ N N O'o ~ ~ ~ o ° c ¢ ._. a ~ `m U ro 3 ~ ro o >,L. U a ... F- U to 3 cn ~ r y o _~ m o Q1 E u~ c i ro> ro~ > o .- N U L w R d a L ° L d fL ° F U~ ro H ro m O • N • B, C,D,E & F- 94 • • :F~r'k^ i3~ „?ra 5a ry ~ i .7i nj "x'F r'~ ^ . :.M ~]' (h (`7 Lh d' ~ ~ N V N N N N N '+~°'.tl ~ o-y } E,~~"`s M ~ ~: F ~r r . fi , "'I. ~i, Lim :=~ U U a a a ^ ^ U ~..~ U 4-= _; a ~. N C N C N G N C N C N C N ~ C iiry `~` ~ O ~~ ~ N d _ O_ _ Q _ O. _ O. _ d _ , d _ ~B~.:i'~ _ O O O O O O O z'~~ O 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 a;-' ° 3 m o 0 o m o o ~ m o m o 0 0 o ran m CC ~ CL ~ CC ~~ ~ ¢ ~~:', ~ :~t refi ^ ^ '~' U U U U U U U ~ U ~ti *a 3 ~~~~ ro O O ^ ^ ^ O O `'~ D m m d a a m m ,4=~; ..~:.• d ~ ~ w ~o C N m a O ~ o O "' o m~ ~ o a ~ ~"~ O O N O ' ~ C p S] C C ~ L 3~ ` - 3 m~ c o'~ o~ ~ °~ _'~ ~ ~ ` = roes ms m ~ o °~-° ~oN sN ~~r.~ _ Na~m o 3 ° ~~~ o 0 d O 0 -O r. n .~ .c °o ~~ O) No_s mo ~„ - o ooro .N -o O N G N _ 3 O y N 3 N O ~v N J> O C m y '6 E X 0 0 E ~ O ~ yl ~ ..NJ C ° N~~ d~ ~>l: >' O -Q U O N O = O C N .- t m N N C N N ro C U C - ~ O U _6 7 '~". {~;~ U N N O t/1 ~tA E S O ... C~ _ ~~ O C N a m N N ~ O N C Q td ~ G O O ~ '.' .` U C C i N N . N f~{4, ` C ~;%:."~° 'a N _ N C j t6 U m O 4J U .~ .- N O U it N O O ro O "- (.~ N td C ° ~ ~ ~ m Q . . , L a ° a~`m "' ~ o''o _ No° ~cc N 60o Q ~ C ~ O ~ ` ~ _~~ C ` r E Q !~, E r - ~ro m ~ C ~ W N c c E ~ C ~ o- o N m C m o o f~ O m ~ o~ E o ro i ~" L E ~~: L ~ o o n. >,.- >. ~ o -= omo_ ° Em E E~ ~ E. ~ m omo~ U c o°~ ~~,~?.' U m %~ m-°m°-oO o~~ m'=>> °-~ ' E N N E° o~ >. or o ~ ° oL m N m o" m o E ° o OY ~ °~ Ur S U N m~ a °-o a ° o U Y o E > c ~ -6 O U K C 'O N C - '6 N C C -O O C p ~`. -O a C tf^NA . i ~ Y O U tb ~ C E ~ .- C C~ ~ ~ C p p f6 ~ ~ C N (6 N 4J l/J C - C U C ~., LL£ ~~+' C d i ... to N O ~ ~ E N C ~ i ~ L _ m Y~ d m TL ro o T.C N m a y s (6 O d c . [6 - d ~Oa ~ . d'c~~. w .C - O N ~ ~'ro o . E p p c o 0 N o N _ c ~ N O_ o ~~ o .~ N ~ Y ~ O_ O O ~ _ N ~ U ~ ~ ina~-- ins NEs C O inEo'c C C U -c -o x ~ o Nm U o'~ ` 7 C N O O '6 N a p x N p 0l G N O O e:(6~, L >+ G (6 N i b ~ _N r U N 3 ~ ~_ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 N= N -~ kl. ~..s~ N O ~C > voi t R W ~in >i N C L O E _ D- N - d ` O N _ O Q N _ Q O _ _ D- O E.Ou C U N U ` F-V U ¢°~o_ o_ Q ¢E~ QEoY Q°~L Q°~3 `C'~>_, -a~°'ma m rn O c*> B, C,D,E & F- 95 a ° ' a a s a a a r °oa n °oa °oa °oa oa ~ E o ~ m E `o `o `0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 a 3 i a a i a i i a i a i ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ Q U U U U m [0 • O O O m m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D d n. a d n. a ~~ro ~ a~?¢ ..: -o~~~~ moo°`?aonQ1~ ~o -O o c N aci._~O o m~°~ 3~ °i E--"~ N °'">:_ >,m-~ C ro 3 ma ro E Q~ U N d~ O ro N O) O j Q ~ O) ro d O -O to = fn c N E oUE cE a.-Eo-~ ~~ ~ N ~ :Y ~ m ° °' c o E ° 0 3 m '- m c_ ' ~ ° ~ ma _o °_ - E m" c L ~~ ~~ m o C Eroma~'" m o"~ U .`- N~ ~ O o~ ~ ro O NE N Ol °i O- L ~- p,nro ~ Q a ro L- ~ = .. . N O_ ~ C~ C ~~ ~ (6 Y~ C O N ~ U L C O_ ro C N D O_ N , N _ w O ~ ~ L ~ t 6 ~ ro I n C~ 01 E N p m C L O) ~ 0 0 O p v O E p i U d °' O OJ ._ d C to >' U U ro U 0 ~ d ~`.- -O O p C E O to o O ~ °~E3 - °'OO°'u~ U O a`"im o-°-~NroEE-' ro ~ -oi.a ~ _ O .~ N w N ro N- O t C C t/J N O . ~ S p -O N _C O) ro C L (6 ro O_- L ,-• O L .L- O 0 0 O O>~ OL.- J~ N1 -p ~ U O U ro -p ~~~ ~ E-C~ ~.CQ QOE VI .O_~~.~t9pttl~ N pp `~ ~~ O O~ ro ~ C OL ~ O ~ C ro C C O ~U U ~ ro N O O N O ~ p O Q U ro E - ~ ~ p O ~ O ~ N L D_ G~ U L '- N O= O (4 O N NL- .C C ~ 0~ O O U C j (6 O d ~~~ U O) ro '~ ~ L O) O G p N ° N _oo °m E c ° N O> _EE ~ j ° ~ EN C C ro~ ro E ~~ U m ro ~ E N ` O -° O ~ ~ a i ro c-o - N N~ - 0 m ro O N . O .-. O ._ E N -° , O d °' N O O C °' N E 3 Q C D_ ,,.. ~n°-- N E O ~ro i L m O O_-O U L~ m o cro? O_O O_~._ LL ro Nm ro ro U 0 ~ N O)D7 ~ o>o_E C p ~~ N ] O ~ ~~ N ~~ N ~ O N~~ ~ ~ U m "=~ ~ Q O C m~ C O U E~~ a`ro a.U~am n. 'o am`o¢ro m O "~w°n.3 ~=~; ¢oE-o . n~= roNa~io°raoQ~o ~ -6 U d rq N E (6 ~ O rn o • 'ct `J B,C,D,E & F- 96 • • '~~; 6a-+ t,,.3 .Y Yri t ~ j~ Y Sl ~\ ~~'~ 4 ' ~~ ~Y CJ [ ~ _u~ jj ~I V ~ V ~i~L ,~~na r-r3 jC ;`T~ ^C ~; yv, cYyrv;, ~ ~ k~ ~: f~ . 1m~1 ~~bM} ~~~ '. ;ee ~`.T~cs f,~Sy~, ~ a o o :~ ~ ~ Q Q ` ` o n. o a N o n d t :'i '~ d _ . *~~~' C O C O C O C O O O O ~~ " '~ _ _ 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~,. ~2 m2 mE m2 m m m ,eri~,: cy cy c~ cN O O O O ~ Q CC ~ U ~ U ~ U ^ U • ~m• ~"'~ {h" l ~~Y,w ,.rvpplj ~-w2Y ~ m ~ D ~~ kF=.: U U U U '~~2.~ ~;~., i5's-~' F ~~ti ~-'~ O O ^ r ns '~ d~fi O O O O m d d. x m m m m m a ° r~ o 0 o L ro c ~='~ ~~ m~ ro o,o o a ~ a o 0 i '' m ` > a U L OI L ro o ~ ~n o ~ ° m ' ro a v, ~ a ~ 3 ii ~ o ~ ~ a~ v ~ m ~ a ~ c c ~ v ,U ~~: ~ o"o ono °~E c y ~= E mro N >T.C O °`° .- O Co ti:::.~ J o~U L aU o O I of L N ° O C C a ~ ~ U a~ i aam O C o E -o . :~ ~ s U C7 ro.' Q L oa c.- 3 ° ¢ o `o U ~ O~ C N y 6 L a`a E C a~roC T --Um :. " ~ ~ 3 U' ai U N Y C c'o -°~ U Uo~ ro t a m o ` > r ro U° C ~,:~ is (!J y a m m ~ a ~ a > ro ... o U .~ o E ~' a _ ~ N a~ a m ~... <ry? T o C ~n D p o~ a~ a~ N ~ ro L C N ro a fn p ~ - ~ N C ~ n »}•1~ L N ro p .- y a 0 ~- N ._ U a d~ f/I N C C y r y ro a E i N ro .~ O ~' ~ +F~~g _ 3~~ N~ N~ ~~ y C a D7 O E E ~ ( } ~ a > ro 0 a ~ 3m o r= o o m Y ~ Eo o o aU r:z 4~5 S~' a o o c m oo Y °- ~ m E° n o o_.- L `~ ~ L_ 1 o. d ro = _a o ~ o a ~ o _T c ° Uyo a Edo °~~'~'`; u c~~ mro O ~>'~3~ D -_ m ro L L ~ y~ ~ O N E X 0 0 p d C~ N ~ .- ~ C .- ... ~%rf~ ..., ~ In ~ U V ro ro _m > L d U U d ro , w > Y O U C N a ro ro O p4Pfy7 ~ N N T h E ti N ro C O ~~° a~-° C ? EF-O- ir ' N C a ~ ~° ~ N ` ` °ro ~`n° ' ~ ~n N = O ro p C E ` ~+m ~ ~ a ~a Q ~, - o in U E . c O N c6 ~ C u i N a C O' C O C O ro 0 N" - U ro a y ro o OR ~ - ro O U ~ ~ _ U L O OI U ro _ a~ m uI _ ro E W U p 0 0 0 ~ a m Y (D„e =~ T N ~ y C` N a 1 N~ N J N N ~ ro 0 E ~ N ~ N ro E C U~ ° O N o a m Ol L y m ` D_ it E O- ^' 0 E •-- p ~-' ~ ro.. N a U ro _ O- N F O ~ O X 'N ~ R O N y C C . Oa y C t D.~ ro= N U D U >~~ a ~>~ ~: ~LmU C y ro D)~ O U p ~° O N UmL U d L (n O y N U ro E m O O d a ro U p O p (n U O ~ (, `~ U~ N y e ro ' ~ O N . C r ° ~ d N ~ U U Oa ti N9 L_ N N L O~, y N C N _ E U E '~ ~ ~ E p O ro L> N a ( j~` F- to ~ 3 ~ lL N d O T _ C7 y .~ U CL m ~ B,C,D,E & F- 97 N N N N ' a a a a N C f/~ C N C V! C c0 r6 td ~ O_ d O. O. O O O O 3 3 3 3 ° o ° m > > > > ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ U U U U m m m m m m m m C ~j ~ L 0 0 i6 ~ 0 0 0~ t6 d t9 E r t0 ~i O L A C ~ O N~ .T ~ a C (6 ^' - N` y O T~ N om= O F O z .'' ' O] U C E J ~ N O y y ro C .~ .'.' t6 ro N to U U O a _ C >> ~ y O- O> O N - N N ~ C N t6 T y U O) > O O~ O N N> U O C.7 N t6 L~ C} °c'm~ E .m ~mon-o ~o ~~m~~~n-~ Eon mLNOU~ a i a U~ in _ _ ~ a~ L ° o o a o °~ o U o m~ _ °-_ ~~~ Y D a ~ ~ a~ o N n o oa ~ o o a c c° R'~..5 ~ c c~ ~ Z ° p t m° a~ d m ~ Q Qc m L- ct°i. `° ~n m `° o ~ " ~ as ° a ~ ° ~ c--`° ~ L"._ ° c z ~ ~U~ ~ ~~~o~Eu"i - ° 'a~m~° ma i ZOa~~ ~ O °'E c°'~o ° ° L °o ~Q°' ` °o Ear°-O ~- a ~ - o m mo ~r o a~ c ~ E~~ ~O -E~~ m`m°~°v LOC `-'~an.w-mo> O L.C NmEL~ , '~ 03j~ ~«-O UN~ ~ Q~ L W .- U E ° L h E C~ O) O O. NX aC p~ U t0 ~ N C ZO ~ °~ ~p 01 C (6 (~ n o o~ ~ a N s ° » ~ ~ c a`~i -° E >. ~ ~ '~ L c m o ~ o ° ° o LO ~Q Oa aNia OU00 O>,~.~YCy~~ OO~CEp~EpE N O N ~~ O_ O U N~ 'C O Q U U N C O ~ C ttl E C O E~ C _ Z [6 d Q 3~ . C O _ O O (6 - O) - O w O C X °- ~~ O _ °~ O N Q N N O a C _ m L Q E R C U p '-' O O N O C U ~ C .ti C tq L C ~ "~~ ~ C O o~ ~. E ~ O. o_mN Oa c L t O ~n o min N ~n ~ EU tq y C O . y m m~ ° ~~ ~ a amid>>a i ° cRi- ~ ~ ami m ~ ° vi o._ c ° ma- ° o 0 i.~ °'~ o m.n ~ 2 i a > -O E y C N E ` ~~ D C~ ttl > C K ttl G~ C U O O C X L ° iv o `4 C y N m o a~ c a~ . > ~ i O ° U - m C3 a~ a~ m ` C O O. L ~ o_'= !? o a~ ~ o ~~ o ` - I-~aUE ~U~'~a~~E° a n .~,~3a~EorL n _m3oU[CO °mU r~ L m O • n • B,C,D,E & F- 98 I • {~.^~". ~F ~:' ~ Axx v i +~ V 7 Q Esn=~t x i= n~_C 3 "~ ,.mot: 'i k`. , . ~ SS;s~: , ~, . '{ ~. . ~~ o 0 0 • ~:. ~ U U U ; ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ ` . N C . N ` ~ y ~ ~ C ~ O C ~ O C O O x s'+ Fl3 ~~eY h'` s, U U U F ta . ~. ~:3 ~> ~ ' z c~? m m ~ ~ ra€~• ,5r`~' ~s~ mma O L ~ ~ "~ m m L.. T mCmT~'Taa m-'-Cm L-- O L Y N m m c m m m p 0 T `° ~~j °.m may coo a~~ EE~m ' N~~ a ° a i '$`~'' E 3 m ~ ~ Y i a- ~ a a . ~~ ~ 3 a ai c c ~. ~ ~ N m m ~ vi ' m ~~~ 6 "~ ~ro °-~~o ' ~ 3 ~ 0 ~O m °' m m-a>.E ~'~ ° 9 ." m O aai ~ : _ J ,, ~_ p p m _ ° m N to C~ U O O m w C _T a C N 0 0~ C U N O L Q m ._ O O C C U ` ~~ ~ m~ m C p 0_ C O T S o "m T ~ O D_ ro ina m f m to L C a m d O ' to C "^4"=- ~ N m a moos c sEm 0 > m vim ~o~m~m~amp° > ° U . n L m tr6 mroZ °' E~ w m ~° E N E m ~ C fA i O m a~ ~~~ °'o d m o~6 m ° ~ C~~ 41 C.O Y OOM T 0 0 ~ m Oa~LL O)L ~ > m L ~~t m T '~ C~ C m _C i °> m N ~- C j C ~ L m ~~. L N ttl (6 = i6 to N m ~ O y m a C m~ 7 a~ m -_ ~ ~ C ~ N O ~ L tpn N ~n~ S-' ~ ~ y Q~ a m m . L a ~ h C m p O L m~ L m L m.J L C ~ a m -L ~ x k?~3 m C m a U U F- C Ol m O . w a Ln.C 'n m ~0 V C O~ N m ' a an d ~ t i'~ ~ C c O m~ ~ m C aE G C C m (~ Y~ O =oamm' ocin maim N ~ ~ TA; _ ~ nm~~ ~.EE ~ `°o m~Er~NO~a ~iY°~U,'~ _ ow _ ~ i, E= o 0 0° c°~ -a c °- L E c ~ L .m ca ~n E O i Y Z m L 3 ° o~ U o ~n ~ .o a rn U m >+ m o m m °~ E ..cO1a¢ ¢3a '`omL '°~~a~api~m0~ro~om E~ ~ _ ~_ ~ `~ ~' ¢ °O a c _ a a ° ~ ~ Tm °-6 0 :, ~n; ~ u i - ov m ~~ ° ~ ~ c c N ~a c>> o a ty- i m in m m a~ i ~ ~ om °1 c c o~~ a c °-' v E 0- m a O% ; Z~ _ X O~ >~ O m w U E~ ~ min O p U~ U L ~ c . O m I~ N O O m O m X 0 0> m U in .- a c U ~ m to m E c U A L L N H m ;. O B, C,D,E & F- 99 a 0 U O) ~ C h ~ C Q O U O m d ~ ~ `° _o ° t6 c ~ uNi c '`9o °aL V, `~~o. 3 ~~ _ mo m~ o lA C C L C (n V [= > N~ O Vi ~ O X t6 O >. U O N L C aE o ~ m~ ~ ~'" °~ a c m 3 Y `~ EL c ~aF a~-o _L O (O ~ >+~ ~ ~ y ~ m ~ m o o C .`. O L t/~ L t6 ~- r O '- - ~ y O ~ a U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o L o 0 a~E>:¢o o cm ~ ~~ K N ~ U ~ y >O ? TN CO Z ib_ U NO•-•a_-O U Ip~ ~ ~ ~ O p L (6 p t~ t0 L ~ `o m 3 E ~o C N E m m o~ 2 m.? O J - «- ~ -O ~ C ~ C _ s .~ c L ~ a°= N N C O .m .~ d a Q N Y U d r U O a d Y ~ • B,C,D,E & F- 100 • • - City of Rancho Cucamonga .,~ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with [he California Environmental Quality Acf Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, and Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163 Public Review Period Closes: September 24, 2008 Project Name: Project Applicant: Lewis Community Developers Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street in the Terra Vista Community-APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Project Description: A request to change the General Plan and Terra Vista Community Plan land use designations of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial; a request to rearrange the existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.73 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Terra Vista Community Plan; and a request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.90 acres of land in the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga- Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. September 24, 2008 Date of Determination Adopted By B,C,D,E & F- 101 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93 A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Builders filed an application for General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the .City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is multi-family residential. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. B, C,D,E & F- 102 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-45 DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS April 24, 2008 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area, since the submitted Master Plan (Conceptual layout) demonstrates a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering methods to mitigate multi-family residential and commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection, and provides vehicle and pedestrian access that is coordinated and logically linked to provide a comprehensive circulation system; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; The Master Plan (Conceptual layout) utilizes access points existing on Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive for the Neighborhood Commercial land use and, primarily, Terra Vista Parkway for the residential use thereby directing traffic to non-residential oriented streets and; c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Designation is described as; "The Neighborhood Commercial designation provides for small-scale shopping centers (approximately 5 to 15 acres) in the residential sectors of the City, offering convenient retail goods and services for residents. Examples of permitted uses within this designation include: eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage retail sales, limited personal, medical and repair services, and retail sales. Neighborhood Commercial centers should be compatible in design and scale with adjacent residential areas. Convenient paths for pedestrian access into and around the center should also be • provided." The General Plan describes Medium-High Residential as; "The Medium-High density designation is characterized by low-rise condominiums and apartment buildings. This density is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment centers, and along major thoroughfares with transit availability." The location and configuration of the requested Amendments is highly compatible with these desired characteristics with the location adjacent to Haven Avenue, Church Street, and Town Center Drive; 4. The information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative • Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. B, C,D,E & F- 103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-45 DRC2008-00160 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS April 24, 2008 • Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during projectimplementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2~ 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 to change the General Plan Land Use Plan designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 Acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and including a Master Plan designation requirement which is included for reference purposes, as shown in Exhibit "B". The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher. Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • B, C,D,E & F- 104 LOW z CHURCH EDI ~ m >r MEDIUM HIGH MIXED USE MEDIUM HIGH 1424 DU/AC (Master Plan Required) INDUSTRIAL PARK Ov ~~ O~ O p Qv NEIGHBORHOOD D COMMERCIAL G m z GENERAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL / OFFICE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL 300 0 300 600 Feet B, C,D,E & F- 105 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00160 (Amending the Land Use Plan) ' - _ _ J.~" ~. W ' ~ .. ~ _~ . -~ .: .. . S .. .. g^ ~'~Z~v„ ~~~ei ; 9~ e9 it • ~„ ~ ~~Qo ~> ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ i ~ _ ~ erc 3 - R3~C ~F ~~~ S L ~ I' L LJ ( ~ a 7 \i ` dd 3= ER ~4b ~ 1 - - m fi ! - ` ~l#31~f'~3~j1i18 °3t~il~ fl ~.`, IBu ~ - ~ ' ~ ,v,k I M ,;rs - 1 ~- ~ ,. c - ::: .< & ,._.., -' Av N µ~~ w ~.. , .. .. _ _ . _ - ~~ , . _ ' ~ ~, ~ a i ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~o-~~ ~~ ii. ~ F i k• O _ r-.., ~~ • z ~ ; ~~~, ~ t ~ ~ 1 ~, r a ~/ ! ~,s °°~ _ ~ ~~ 11 _yfi 4 } _. _ -- ~- s ~ '~ih~.4:.n~T,,'yt..yp~~~F fJ~ J."~ i. + ~ ,'~ --- - - W Z ` i ~., ~. ~~ .~ ~ ~- ~ r' d~ _ ~ rr 2 Die 1~;~~ 1~~ s ~b , X • as W ~ i. ~~ ~. ~ I~~sT~,P~ _ z~ au `:i ~xHlgli`"~~~~~ g~ zo i' U~" i. ~. ~ w z~~, ~ ~~'~ N 'Z.~.. ~. B, C',D,E &, F-', '106 ',. • RESOLUTION NO. 08-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS REQUESTING TO AMEND THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY LAND USE PLAN (FIGURE III-17) FROM OF 14.73 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Developers filed an application for Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subjectTerra Vista Community Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 24, 2008 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2008-00161 and issued Resolution No. 08-45, recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 be • approved. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 14.73 acres of undeveloped land, basically a rectangular configuration, located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street, and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and is multi-family residential. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and Commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. • c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and B, C,D,E & F- 107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-46 DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 2 • d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determiriation, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the • Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. B,C,D,E & F- 108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-46 DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 as shown in the attached City Council draft ordinance. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the • Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: B, C,D,E & F- 109 . ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161, A REQUEST TO AMEND LAND USE PLAN (FIGURE III-17) DESIGNATION OF 14.73 ACRES OF UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET FROM OFFICE TO APPROXIMATELY 11.83 ACRES OF MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL (14-24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND 2.90 ACRES OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-46, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Amendment. 2. On , 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. •B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on , 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 3: The Terra Vista Community Plan, is hereby amended to change the Land Use Plan (Figure III-17) designation of 14.73 acres of undeveloped land in the Terra Vista Planned Community at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Church Street from Office to approximately 11.83 acres of Medium-High Residential (14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) and 2.90 acres of Neighborhood Commercial, ~ncluding a Master Plan requirement designation, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." B,C,D,E & F- 110 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2008-00161 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS ,2008 • Page 2 SECTION 4: Terra,Vista Planned Community Land Use Plan (Figure III-17), is hereby amended to include a Conceptual Master Plan, as shown in Exhibit "B". SECTION 5: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. a. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section • 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • B,C,D,E & f- 111 - ~~ x D m z • • 200 0 200 400 Feet ~I B,C,D,E & F- 112 EXHIBIT "A" TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2008-00161 (Amending Figure III-7 Land Use Plan) i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 SUBJECT: SUBDIVISION OF 14.73 ACRES APPLICANT: LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOW N CENTER DRIVE- LOCATION: APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TD YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date • General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Parcel No. 18797 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160 and Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-47, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.25 B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/_ • Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. B, C,D,E & F- 114 Project No. SUBTPM18797 Comoletion Date C. Site Development coordinated for ll b t l h t i / / • mprovemen p ans s a e 1. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and stree _ _ _ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 3. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 4. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Shopping Centers 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) _/_/_ shall be subject to separate DevelopmenUDesign Review process for Planning Commission approval. Modifications to the Shopping Center Master Plan shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. 2. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be _/_/_ included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval • prior to the issuance of building permits. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on _/_/_ this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; • 2 B, C,D,E & F- 115 Project No. SUBTPM18797 Completion Date b. Foundation Plan; • c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; i. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTPM18797) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _(_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. H. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (SUBTPM18797). The applicant shall complywith the latest • adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/ /_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). I. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC /_/_ Section 1505. B,C,D,E & F- 116 Protect No SUBTPM18797 Completion Date 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/~ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ J. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. L. Street Improvements ' 1. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. • 4 B, C,D,E & F- 117 Protect No. SUBTPM18797 • 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Metlian Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X Town Center Avenue X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be Installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and • Interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a miriimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. u Completion Date / / / / / / / / -~-~. / / / / -~-~ -~-~. B, C,D,E & F- 118 Project No SUBTPM18797 Comolehon Date Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size oty. Haven Avenue Foreground: P.A. 8 feet or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8 ft. 60 ft. o.c. 15-gal. "Majestic Beauty' P A. less than 8 feet Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3 tt 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. "St. Mary' Primary tree in masses Brachychrton populneus Bottletree B ft. 25 ft. o.c. 15-gal. behind sidewalk Town Center Drive Geijera parviflora Australian Willow 5 ft. 20 ft. o.c 15-gat Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. N 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: all public improvements. O Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. / / • / / • / / -~- / / / / / / • 6 B, C,D,E & F- 119 Protect No SUBTPM18797 Completion Date 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permlts, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that maybe received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Prior to the issuance of building permlts, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during constructlon and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the constructlon and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • B, C,D,E & F- 120 ,,~;--_:-., Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~eexoxe x ~~ d a, } "~-~~` Fire Construction Services `_. STANDARD CONDITIONS Haven & Town Center Retail Center NEC of Haven Avenue & Town Center Drive (2) Commercial Buildings SUBTPM18797 & DRC2008-00163 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonpa.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be • provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. B, C,D,E & F- 121 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. • This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1 . Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and • the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 15f story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. 2 B, C,D,E & F- 122 b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. • f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. 3 B, C,D,E & F- 123 g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. • h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be, installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire laries. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with • construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building • construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or 4 B,C,D,E & F- 124 operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the X92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are • required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the • issuance of any building permits: 5 B,C,D,E & F- 125 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hvdrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a testof the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be 'submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 6 • • B, C,D,E & F- 126 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the, approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. • 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 7 B, C,D,E & F- 127 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797, A REQUEST TO REARRANGE THE EXISTING LOT CONFIGURATION AND CREATE NEW SEPARATE PARCELS ON APPROXIMATELY 14.73 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE OFFICE DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AND LOCATED NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE IN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Developers filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application". 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically fnds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 2.89 acres of land, basically an "L" shaped configuration, located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Office; and b. The property to the north of the sublect site is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and Commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and • d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties B, C,D,E & F- 128 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistentwith the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the • Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. B, C,D,E & F- 129 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Engineering Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards, as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street lights, or repair as required. Additional street trees may be required during plan check. b) Protect all existing traffic signal equipment in place or repair as needed. c) Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. 2) Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary' standards as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights, as required. b) Protect "Two-Way Left Turn" lane in Town Center Drive. • c) Protect R26(s) signs along Town Center Drive frontage, as required. d) Install street trees per City Standards. 3) Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive frontage public improvements shall be privately maintained. Building and Safety Department (Grading) 1) The submitted Water Quality Management Plan (W QMP) is approved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" was approved on June 30, 2008, and maybe notarized and recorded. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and B, C,D,E & F- 130 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 4 • found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) dailyto reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96~ hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include • a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. B, C,D,E & F- 131 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 ® Page 5 ' 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor • construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resources (i.e..plant or animal fossils) are encountered • before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation B,C,D,E & F- 132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 6 measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by • SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and • implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the B, C,D,E & F- 133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 7 following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as'sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) See other specific BMPs from the WQMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, on-file in the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Post- Construction Operational: 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated • June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting of walls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2008. B, C,D,E & F- 134 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-47 SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 8 • Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met. 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Building and Safety Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the • developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of~the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: B,C,D,E & F- 135 ,~~°"~~,,,~:°. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 3 • uP ^ l ~,~- Fire Construction Services ~_; STANDARD CONDITIONS Haven & Town Center Retail Center NEC of Haven Avenue & Town Center Drive (2) Commercial Buildings SUBTPM18797 & DRC2008-00163 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. C ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. • d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. B, C,D,E & F- 136 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed • is 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 15' story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. 2 B,C,D,E & F- 137 b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. • f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. 3 B, C,D,E & F- 138 g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. • h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with • construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building • construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or 4 B, C,D,E & F- 139 operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. . • Candles and open flames in public assemblies ` • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. • The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 5 B, C,D,E & F- 140 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications; flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. • Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior,to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for • obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for. hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. • 6 B, C,D,E & F- 141 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system, must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. •9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 Yz" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 7 B, C,D,E & F- 142 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00163, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 26,884 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERICAL CENTER ON 2.90 ACRES OF LAND IN THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERICAL DISTRICT GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE IN THE TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A. Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Developers filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00163, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the • City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, with a street frontage of 200 feet on Haven Avenue and 200 feet on Town Center Drive and lot depth of 487 feet, and which is presently vacant but with previously improved street frontages; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Office (proposed Medium-High Residential (14 to 24 dwelling units per acre)) and is vacant. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and Commercial. The property to the east is designated Office and is developed with an office park. The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial; and c. The Commercial portion of the project has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .21 compared to a General Plan range of .25 to .35.; and d. Provides a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering • methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection; and e. The Center has been planned as a group of two buildings with one major (Fresh and Easy) and one multi-tenant building. B,C,D,E & F- 143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City • staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this • Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. B,C,D,E & F- 144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 3 Planning Department 1) Major Tenant "A" Building (Fresh and Easy) shall be required to: a) Mount a video camera inside the premises in such a position as to be visible to patrons yet not accessible by reach. b) Post the notice of the facility that California State Law prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages to persons who are under the age of 21 years and no such sales shall be made. c) No more than 30 percent of the square footage of the windows and clear doors for temporary signs shall be placed and maintained and that will not be a hindrance to law enforcement personnel thereby providing a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises, including the area the cash registers are maintained, from exterior public side walk, parking areas, or entrance. d) Post and maintain a professional sign in accordance with City Sign Code limitations that states; "No loitering is allowed on or in front of these premises." • e) Post and maintain a professional sign in accordance with City Sign Code limitations that states; "No open alcoholic beverages containers are allowed on these premises". f) Litter shall be removed daily from the premises including adjacent public walks and all parking areas under the control of the licensee. g) If the location becomes a high gathering spot, management shall comply with any request by the Police Department that is determined by the Department that is necessary to keep the peace. h) All store employees are to be trained with the TIPS (Training for Intervention Procedures) liquor awareness training program. All beer is sold in quantities of six packs or larger. Engineering Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards, as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street lights, or repair as required. Additional street trees may be required during plan check. • b) Protect all existing traffic signal equipment in place or repair as needed. c) Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. B, C,D,E & F- 145 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 4 2) Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City. "Secondary" standards as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights, as required. b) Protect "Two-Way Left Turn" lane in Town Center Drive. c) Protect R26(s) signs along Town Center Drive frontage, as required. d) Install street trees per City Standards. 3) Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive frontage public improvements shall be privately maintained. Building and Safety Department (Grading) 1) Maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be addressed in the project Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (CC&Rs). 2) The submitted WOMP is approved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" was approved on June 30, 2008, and maybe notarized and recorded. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • • B,C,D,E & F- 146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 5 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RW QCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD • Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 1 1) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. . 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. B,C,D,E & F- 147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 6 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resources (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • B, C,D,E & F- 148 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 7 Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes. • 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved bySCAOMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the. Building and Safety Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. • 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. B, C,D,E & f- 149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 8 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of,debris or sediment from the site. 5)' See other specific BMPs from the WOMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, on-file in the Rancho Cucamonga .Planning Department. Post- Construction Operational 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. • 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City • Engineer for approval of a W QMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.- The WOMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting of walls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2008. Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met. 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and • 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. B, C,D,E & F- 150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-48 DRC2008-00163 - LEW IS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 9 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured atthe properlyline. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Building and Safety Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • B,C,D,E & F- 151 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00163 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF A 26,884 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER APPLICANT: LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS LOCATION: NORTH OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date • General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of DRC2008-00163 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-48, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ protect planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.25 B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ • building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. B, C,D,E & F- 152 Project No DRC2008-00763 Completion Date C Site Development ed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include The site shall be develo 1 / / • . p _ _ _ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. , 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Light poles are limited to maximum height of • 15 feet including base. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/_/_ all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. L .J B, C,D,E & F- 153 Protect No DFC2008-00163 Completion Date J • • Shopping Centers 1. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, _/_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_/_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). _/_/_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/_/_ d. Rotl-up doors. _/_/_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. _/_/_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. _/_/_ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view. 3. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. only. _/_/_ 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. _/_/_ 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. ' 6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." _/_/_ 7. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 60 d6 during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manrier which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 8. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. _/_/_ 9. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. _/_/_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or anycombination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be _/_/ included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. B,C,D,E & F- 154 Protect No DRC2008-00163 Comoletion Date E. F G H. 12. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into _/_/_ the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • 13. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping _/_/_ carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each workday. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, painLroll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/_ building colors. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_: parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. W arehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/_ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development. Landscaping 1. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's • recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 4 B, C,D,E & F- 155 Protect No. DRC2008-00163 Completion Date 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 % within • commercial and office protects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking slat Is. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 8. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. • Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; - c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans; including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / /_! /-/ /_/. -/-/- B,C,D,E & F- 156 Project No DRC2008-00163 Completion Date g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2008-00163) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. ~ -/-/- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2008-00163). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. • 4. Construction activity, shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_!_ Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial • conformance with the approved grading plan. 6 B,C,D,E & F- 157 Protect No. DRC2008-00163 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. • 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O • Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X Town Center Drive X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- / / -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- 7 B,C,D,E & F- 158 Prgecl No. DRC2008-00163 Comoletion Date d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified; e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adfust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Projeci Engineer. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Oty. Haven Avenue Foreground: P.A 8 feet or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8 ft 60 ft. o.c. 15-gal. 'Maiestic Beauty" P.A. Tess than 8 feet Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3 ft. 20 ft o.c. 15-gal. "St. Mary' Primary tree in masses Brachychiton populneus Bottletree 8 ft 25 f[ o.c. 15-gal. behind sidewalk Town Center Drive Gegera parviflora Australian Wtllow 5 ft. 20 ft o.c 15-gal. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only / / -~-~- / / -~-~- / / -~-~- / / • • 8 B, C,D,E & F- 159 Project No DRC2008-00163 6. Intersection Tine of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project • intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join andlor form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED. LJ Comoletion Date -!- -!-!- -!-!- -/-!. / / / _ -!-!- 9 B, C,D,E & F- 160 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00163, IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, FOR A 26,884 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER ON 2.90 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET NORTH OF THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, AND 93. A Recitals. 1. Lewis Community Developers filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2008-00163 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal public hearing prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals; Part A, of, this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located north of the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, with a street frontage of 200 feet on Haven Avenue and 200 feet on Town Center Drive and lot depth of 487 feet, and which is presently vacant but with previously improved street frontages; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Office (proposed Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)) and is vacant. The property to the west is designated General Commercial and Mixed Use (Office) and is vacant and Commercial. The property to the east is designated Offce and is developed with an office park The property to the south is designated Office and Community Commercial and is vacant and retail commercial. c. The Commercial portion of the project has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .21 compared to a General Plan range of .25 to .35; and d. Provides a design that provides a transition from more sensitive land uses and buffering • methods to mitigate commercial activities such as loading, lighting, and trash collection; and B, C,D,E & F- 161 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 2 e. The Center has been planned as a group of two buildings with one major (Fresh and Easy) and one multi-tenant building. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, wi11 not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. J 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, • and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and fnds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation • Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those B, C,D,E & F- 162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 3 documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Major Tenant "A" Building (Fresh and Easy) shall be required to: a) Mount a video camera inside the premises in such a position as to be visible to patrons yet not accessible by reach. b) Post the notice of the facility that California State Law prohibits the sale of alcoholic beverages to persons who are under the age of 21 years and no such sales shall be made. c) No more than 30 percent of the square footage of the windows and clear doors for temporary signs shall be placed and maintained and that will not be a hindrance to law enforcement personnel thereby providing a clear and unobstructed view of the interior of the premises, including the area the cash registers are maintained, from exterior public side walk, parking • areas, or entrance. d) Post and maintain a professional sign in accordance with City Sign Code limitations that states; "No loitering is allowed on or in front of these premises." e) Post and maintain a professional sign in accordance with City Sign Code limitations that states; "No open alcoholic beverages containers are allowed on these premises". f) Litter shall be removed daily from the premises including adjacent public walks and all parking areas under the control of the licensee. g) If the location becomes a high gathering spot, management shall comply with any request by the Police Department that is determined by the Department is necessary to keep the peace. h) All store employees are to be trained with the TIPS (Training for Intervention Procedures) liquor awareness training program. i) All beer is sold in quantities of six packs or larger. Engineering Department 1) Ha ven Avenue frontage improvements are to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards, as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street lights, or repair as required. Additional street trees may be required during plan B, C,D,E & F- 163 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 4 check. b) Protect all existing traffic signal equipment in place or repair as needed. c) Protect existing R26(s) signs, or replace as required. 2) Town Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a) Protect existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lights, as required. b) Protect "Two-Way Left Turn" lane in Town Center Drive. c) Protect R26(s) signs along Town Center Drive frontage, as required. d) Install street trees per City Standards. 3) Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive frontage public improvements shall be privately maintained. Building and Safety Department (Grading) 1) Maintenance of Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be addressed in the project Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions (CC&Rs). 2) The submitted WQMP is approved. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" was approved on June 30, 2008, and may be notarized and recorded. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. u • • B, C,D,E & F- 164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-49 DRC2008-0016 3 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 5 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWOCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for • vanpools. B, C,D,E & F- 165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 6 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 1 S) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or • significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resources (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where • B,C,D,E & F- 166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 7 mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building and Safety Official for approval of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control B, C,D,E & F- 167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 8 on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure'to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) See other specific BMPs from the WQMP prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, on-file in the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Post- Construction Operational: • 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality • Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Madole & Associates, Inc., dated June 23, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the 'City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building and Safety Official for coverage underthe • NPDES General Construction Permit. B, C,D,E & F- 168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 • Page 9 Noise Exterior: Noise barriers along all the perimeters consisting ofwalls and patio/balcony barriers will be required in conformance with the Noise Study prepared by LSA Associates, Inc., dated February 2008. Interior: Air Conditioning systems are required and, along with meeting Title 24 Standards, all interior standards will be met. 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times maybe required by the Building and Safety Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building and Safety Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building and Safety Official. tf noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of • compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the B, C,D,E & F- 169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-49 DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS September 24, 2008 Page 10 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • B,C,D,E & F- 170 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00163 SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION OF A 26,884 SQUARE FOOT RETAIL COMMERCIAL CENTER APPLICANT: LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS LOCATION: NORTH OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND TOWN CENTER DRIVE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comoletion Date • General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2 Approval of DRC2008-00163 is granted subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. 3 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 08-49, Standard _/_!_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this protect. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.25 B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. B, C,D,E & F- 171 'Project No DRC2008-00163 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Terra Vista Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Light poles are limited to maximum height of 15 feet including base. • 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with _/ /_ all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Fot single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 12. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. B, C,D,E & F- 172 Project No. DRC2008-00163 Comoiehon Date D. Shopping Centers • 1. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, _/_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. ' Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_/_ Planning Director: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). _/_/_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/_/_ d. Roll-up doors. _/_/_ e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. _/_/_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. _/_/ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view. 3. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. only. _!_/_ 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. _/_/_ 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/ • debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." _/_/_ 7. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/_ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 8. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. _/_/_ 9. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. _/_/_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be _/_/ included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza _/_/ . area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 3 B, C,D,E & F- 173 Project No. DRC2008-00163 Completion Date E. F G H. 12. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into _/ / the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping _/_/_ carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each workday. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main _/_/ building colors. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of _/_/ • stalls for use by the handicapped. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/_ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for _/_/ commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other _/_/_ non-residential development. Landscaping 1. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in _/_/_ accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant 'shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. B, C,D,E & F- 174 Project No. DRC2008-00163 Completion Date 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within • commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 8. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Dirdctor review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and Location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- / / /-/ /_ /-/ -/-/- 5 B, C,D,E & F- 175 Protect No DRC2008-00163 Completion Date g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2008-00163) clearly identified on the outside of 2. all plans. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ • Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal: 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2008-00163). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development protect or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. • 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). M. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. . 6 B, C,D,E & F- 176 Protect No. DRC2008-00163 Completion Date 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to • perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. • Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Metlian Island Bike Trail Other Haven Avenue X Town Center Drive X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. J c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. -~- - -~-~- / / / / / / / / -/-/ 7 B,C,D,E & F- 177 Project No. DRC2008-00163 Completion Date Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Dty. Haven Avenue Foreground P.A. 8 feet or greater Magnolia grandiflora NCN 8 ft. 60 ft o.c 15-gal. "Maiestic Beauty" P.A. less than 8 feet Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3 tt. 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. "St Mary" Primary tree m masses Brachychiton populneus Bottletree 8 ft 25 ft o c 15-gal. behind sidewalk Town Center Drive Geiiera parviflora Australian Willow 5 ft. 20 tt, o c 15-gal. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to .the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. J -~-~- / / / / / / / / _/-/- . • B, C,D,E & F- 178 Prp~ect No DRC2008-00163 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with • adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan Haven Avenue. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential • projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED ~J Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- -/-/. 9 B, C,D,E & F- 179 f'` ~~;~, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District w.,~o,r l' Fire Construction Services ,~ STANDARD CONDITIONS Haven & Town Center Retail Center NEC of Haven Avenue & Town Center Drive (2) Commercial Buildings SUBTPM18797 & DRC2008-00163 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at htto://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. • d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. B,C,D,E & F- 180 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed • is 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required ,by the2007 California Fire Code and • the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1S1 story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. 2 B, C,D,E & F- 181 b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. • c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14- feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. • b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested, from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. • f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. 3 B, C,D,E & F- 182 g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. • h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switdh must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the .minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 8. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with • construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building • construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or 4 B,C,D,E & F- 183 operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Sy • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services stems Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials ,in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation 1. RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. • The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the site plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorders Office. Reciprocal access agreement -Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and anon-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Reciprocal water covenant -Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the fire District. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the .issuance of any building permits: 5 B, C,D,E & F- 184 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and- operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit aplan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for • obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective,Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. • B,C,D,E & F- 185 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. • 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. • 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. ', 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. \J 7 B, C,D,E & F- 186 T H E C I T Y O F Nr R A N C tl O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 - • CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development consisting of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.4 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street. At the time the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I (9.8 acre parcel), with only Phase II (3.6 acre parcel) being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Over the past couple of months, the Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a CUP application that will complete Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of the master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surroundino Land Use and Zonino: North - Phase I of Crossroads RV Storage and 210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange; Low Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South - I-15 Freeway; I-15 Freeway . East - I-15 Freeway; I-15 Freeway West - Etiwanda CreeWSan Sevaine Flood Control Channel and Victoria Street Retention Basin; Open Space (Etiwanda Specific Plan) ITEM G & H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Flood Control/Utility Corridor North - Low Residential South - I-15 Freeway East - I-15 Freeway West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: The proposed project is located at the confluence of the Eastbound I-210 and Southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 250 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. Access to the 3.6-acre parcel is from Victoria Street just west of the I-15 overpass, via a maintenance road for the flood control channel. The applicant has an agreement with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to use the maintenance road. • ANALYSIS: A. Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment: Phase II of the master-planned project is located in the Open Space District, which does not permit recreational and boat storage and self-storage facilities. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission unanimously voted (Waverly absent) to initiate the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 proposed by Charles Joseph Associates. The amendment would specifically allow recreational and boat storage and • self-storage facilities subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwarda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. In the unlikely scenario that Phase II is not constructed, the land use will remain Open Space and alternative development possibilities are limited under the present Open Space Regulations of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. With the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways and access challenges, any future proposals to change the land use designation to the 3.6-acre parcel would not be supported by Planning Department staff. Accordingly, given the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, the previous approval of Phase I and the master plan for the recreational vehicle and self-storage project, and site constraints that guide logical land use analysis, Planning staff concurs with the applicant's request to amend the text of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In order to conditionally permit the completion of the master planned project in a location that is very suitable for this type of use, and preclude development of recreational vehicle storage facilities and self-storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites, staff recommends that the language in the Etiwanda Specific Plan be amended as follows: Addition of the following text to Part II of Chapter S 5 24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS. .304 Conditional Uses: "Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage and Self-storage Facilities, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound • I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange." G&H-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 3 B. Use Description and Hours of Operation: As noted above, Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units of varying sizes. Phase I includes a caretaker's office that will service both the recreational vehicle storage and the self-storage facility. General office hours are 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., 5 days a week. Access to the site after hours will be limited and controlled through the use of an access code. C. Site Improvements and General Design: Access to the 3.6 acre parcel will be off Victoria Street, via a San Bernardino County Flood Control District maintenance road. The exterior elevations along the I-15 Freeway will match the style and rhythm of Phase I (stone columns with arches and split-face block exterior). Since the project is located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Area, the landscape palette and plant spacing along the east property Tine and in the planter areas on either side of the Fire Department's access road (near west property line) are designed to meet the Fire District's Fuel Modification requirements. Along the Victoria frontage, in keeping with low impact development and water usage reduction goals, the applicant is proposing rockscape and a drought tolerant plant palette. D. Land Use Compatibility: The premise of all Conditional Use Permits is to ensure the compatibility of adjacent uses and separation of potential nuisance activities. Land uses surrounding the existing facility consist of the I-15 and 210 Freeways to the east and south, and to the west is the Etiwanda Creek/San Sevaine drainage channel. To the north is Phase I of'the recreational vehicle storage facility. To the northwest, across the San Sevaine/Etiwanda Creek drainage channel is an existing single-family neighborhood. Given the immediate proximity of the site to the I-15 and • 210 Freeways and exposure to high noise levels that preclude the development of other land uses, the location is a logical choice for self-storage. A photometric study has been completed in order to demonstrate that illumination will be confined within the project site at or below the allowable foot candle requirements. Iri order to prevent light pollution, a condition of approval has been included requiring all light fixtures to utilize glare shields. E. Parkin :The use will not generate any off-street parking requirements since the operation involves the unloading, loading and storage of personal property. The caretaker's facility includes three vehicle stalls for office visits and customer service. F. Noise, Odor and Vibration: The proposed use will not create any noise, odor or vibration. G. Roof-Mounted Equipment: The proposed use will not require the installation of any roof-mounted equipment H. Grading Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on August 19, 2008. The Committee recommended approval. I. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed on August 19, 2008, by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart and Nicholson). At the meeting, the Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval, subject to the conditions in the attached Resolution of Approval. J. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project On August 19, 2008, and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. • K. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Cultural Resources, G&H-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 AND DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 4 Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Geology and Soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on August 20, 2008, at Etiwanda Gardens at 7576 Etiwanda Avenue. The applicant's consultant, Charles Joseph Associates, was available to answer questions. One resident attended the meeting and inquired about the noise levels the protect would generate. Mr. Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates explained that the noise levels from the storage facility would be less than the I-15 Freeway. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received in regard to this project. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission .adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935 will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative • Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, . ~ ~ ~.~ Jams .Troyer, AICP Planni g Director JT:DG/ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Landscape Plan Exhibit E -Building Floor Plan Exhibit F -Building Elevations Exhibit G -Photometric Diagram Exhibit H -Fire Access Plan Exhibit I -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Report from Charles Joseph Associates Exhibit J -Design Review Action Comments dated August 19, 2008 Exhibit K -Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 12, 2008 Exhibit L -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment • DRC2007-00935 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 G&H-4 • • .~1 -XMOFNGT. __ _- ~nl ~~ FREEWAY _ .. - .__. _____~_ __ __ _--_ _ _ I__._ ._ _ II^I __ /~n5 ~ ~- Y -~f ~ rt Q ~; a W a ,;~~;' c~ Q_~a O~O _. __ WQ ~QJ ~_~ a ~ ~ ~ W L.L ~ 0~\~G U PO~v Q ~~~ .p"'' ------o06~iOC ,~~o~e-- ~05~t . ~ f i ---- ,- ~'~~i ~L/OKESTONE ST/ f :$ ~3 .~ 2~ ' ~ r }$ E'~ .~g Q ]¢ §g ~f h! 9e 5 Z y m Q 0 s _~ r , Q ~ ¢' ~4 nl __ ~ Y 6 C 'U Q 2 6Q O V ~o~' ad ~. os„~• O a6NJ~e< t W:p„o~~ ¢v . u Q Owns p rcx-~ Y xd f H U U `' ,. .. i~ ~1~~1 ~' ~ - -~' ~'~ R~~. ~ ' _ s - - - a'~.~r:~' F' -~ ~C 41;~ ~ t f -r ~ ~ ;;~ ~ ;: ! i 4 Y t3M~ . ~v_ ~ / r' y i T%i ~ ~w ~ ~.~ ~'f ~~ ~ f-'ice; / ~i l / 1>~ ~~,_ ~ ~ , ,._ ,, Y~ ~~ , ~~: <,r-;, ~~ I ~ r fit. '..Pr~fi;;~ i x~ r~'~'-; ~'^ F / ~ ~ / /Y° j, ~i `~, .~ ~ ~ ~,' -r;a~~ ;i;,yt~ ~~~ Ii ~~ % u _. _J _ ,~_ _-.L_-., _.__~L_,r--_- 1__ EXHIBIT A b / €~ M1~z 5 ~OJ '~~1- '" ~P~' G~0 ~~ F 6 r ~,, 1351 flE~ 1311 1t7 1 G&H-5 I u Ef O Z w e O V a " ~ ~ ~ Y~ < 0 5 9 ],?}} a Bq }Y~ tl! C c F 2 2 L~e:"Ep~~91 Y~~yad ~ I N N O qy F :x g3 a ~ 4 j ZdO~-~ qe 4~EY U Q 6 W o a b.. s. a? . ~ ~. ~ Y' s ~ LL ~ o § -ga ~Fa ~~~' H~ ~~:' 1 °~ ~' ? R a A by `? q 5 6 } _ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~~ b` ~ ~Y " ~ 1 6g 5 9 ~ ~ Y i 6 ,, U o ~~ ~ ~ $ x Y- ~? ~~ ~ ~ 5 ~Up a o Y~Y S YY9 .:9 ptt Q¢5F o ee j y ~ Y y~ ~ ~ ~t ~ 7 ~ ~ I I a f? ppg8! Psa'gP f$ 9~ a %i9i2E~f:1P?v. W W ~ O OOFJOF~ O Oc% 0000 w ~~ ~ ' m e ~I ~Ir„"~~", ~~,~ ~ I I I I 6 p: ...ia:9A3Y .~ '1 ~ ~'x '° ~i ~~ ~\~ ~ ~ ~ g.r ~` -- -- -\-~ o'er: ~~~ ~` ~;\~`~ O -'~~ I I \\ b ~ \ e o~<~ ~14~ to ~ ~ g ~l pIp FR ~x ` - Y n_ ~ pls `+~y\ .t STN xa.ly ~ L N i i ~iA \ \` xSE Yp G~q Y P _iy ~ ~ ,yx, \ 9" e P 4 P - ~ 4y t .[ ar , N aT'I ,r 4 py^y`` ~ ~e x a u ~- i- a aplfia G. .y.~ ~ ~`~~ ~f? xi\I9li l•i '~ ~'u Y:_W ~-in GiL-~~~~1'f~'~.,, :~t ~~~. O rl w l O o UV o I II O iii EXHIBIT ~B ___. ~. ^,~. N/SY6 HQ/O1~/n ~~,m a ~® I~ ~ Z Y/~J a rya oaN ' \ \~ ~ G&H-6 V1VO 1J3fOHd'N 3SVFId-NVld all 9a l pg WSn Mtn ry aw~TVU.MV:c 4 ~ a ~~~ ~ `JNItl33NIaJtJ3 OO~VNOf3 3`JVtlO1S A!1 SOVOFISSOtlJ yo ~. 4 \ ~~ y~ ® J ~~ a a S 1 ', Y ~ ~ 0 (J W I N ~~ WQ ~ m a ~ / ¢¢ A Wy 1 . \ U S Z c A { p~• \ ~Fe \ SFF 3 i ~ !° ~ 'l ~a ~ ~~ _ y Y i N - ' r a Aa N !! ~c a o' _fl e G ' ~ Ie ~ !! 4 ~dN ajr~ A .~ e.1:5'a e; !°• ~```i., s°s 4131 p F e77 osy :,~*eye ~ 4° ' ' 4 c: [ e A ~ e e p $} ;[%5 ~e e 4 ~.q~ ,~ a "~ 1(°( .i i' !•! e gpQ pqg g8 y1 9894 gH ~ : . ~ : ° 9a ~ o ~ ~. :r e ~t !' ~ ((## jy F qg 5S 555BS __..._._ i o e .a 7~; o A e , ~~~33 3F'~:£ • Q":. . 99 . i c ; £;4:~ s! ' 0 ' a 7 Y a : ~ ~ r p A y n • ~ e _-.~A 'o e'3''e ~a ,x~i a 9N; P;e p~e. .y ! ~ ip Ep •: .., a ;~ e'[%i,e e a in u e'tltl C ! x a i' S ° ~ ~ ii ~p-sy-~,a-~x--~-,TC~--r~-ea~ ..csc ! C E S I A~ ; A e. : ~ ~: e[ a.~ o ~ .: ^^ e A a e e °• - s e 9 9 i, .~; ' e aiaan¢a¢aa 'I v° 1 E ' % ~ • e8 .r § gyp! . < ~ ~~~-~ . -'aN erf~rfi i'F:4'i o.=,# -: / ! ~ ( e ~A_ a e' 'B e le eeeaee ec E § ~ • 4 F~ d ~ ~ x ~ dp% eeeeeeeecaAeiuACeAeceeeeeetgenaeesee -- s m -' --- -9~§ --'- o ~:~~ ` - - il v 13N4YM7 'A7y(NCJ OOJI/ - yi3d'J YONYMII3 ( ,~~ a 7 we _ Z Q a : ~ .v,,, 7.m . ~ : ' V ~1g t~ o ~~ O ;o N ;s ] d~~. 1f <<< ~'s o ~ :S ~ i ~ .. AAA I ~ A5a v A f ~/ -+ A ~N x ' ~ i i ~ i 1~ ~ .. ~~ ~ ~ , \ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ . ~ ypyp I \ gS v§ ~ yy p®y ~~ ~ PA FI ; ' ~ ~ J ~ 6§j y FYF ^ P ~l y3y y °[i 9956~~ ~ ~~SS y §i i F § ~ I [i @~ ~ a ~ 3 - i J FF ~ e S 3 F ~ i ~ § F F ~F'Q G ~ a € 1 ~ ~ $ !@q a ~: Y ~ ~ ff E i e e ~ ~~ ~ ai ~ e ~ g§ p ~p YYs~~ ~~ ~ 8 ~~ e ~§ ~ Q c Q f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ § g y$FAyYy ~p ~y$F '~jp ~ijC g '~ P( 2e ~ ~ ' ' ~~ § ~ a V i i ii §2 Y ^~[ ~ 3~8~~ tlA S y§ e § t I a~ W r n p Y ~ ~ 55dS ~ i ~ (g ¢ O U ~ ~j BtiO aa R9 jQj {$ [~ll~ 6 3 i a • \J • G&H-7 u e ~d gig~ Y~ ~z J y ~a YwJ ~Z ~~ ~J ~~ y~ ~W V Q V O OG y ~1 ~I E € • i~ EXHIBIT x C °gg 3' F.'a,.£ ~9s '[.i6G : [ ~~ da€ da3 ; €x5 ' x a p ~ i~~ id ~ ;e €~3e; E:! gg ' ' p !! ai ° ~ ss ~ ~ r~ w 6 3 :e~ ~ a ~;& ~ g ~ ~ o~ €f ei5 ti t i }~ t pp a I ~P ~Q% E %' ~f ' ~ ~~ ; 3 a B_6 @ d 6 € ¢ dg is a e~ i i a a f'`~ve~ S a 3 g d pp6 a _43gQ€_'v > ~EQ 9 °qs 9~3e~e~ W ga; Q-Y ° i~ ~~ ¢° jE ~ ~4 ggf4 e o ~9 @~ $~ ~~ 33~ 3~ a`s=` a=~ ~ ~e ~a: ,`~ d° dt $7 ~7 §$ is : ~~?:aaz~ eyixi rc Y ¢ 5 d€'°iY -6p rc =' 3 d 1 i i 6 3.65_:5 9F?tl i 1~6 ~~~ Y ~~ ~ e ~~~ 2 ~ IPQ ~E Y C Z 6 < J w 6 ~ o z o°o 3 r jwu paJ p2j <6f O L p W x U N Z O ~ u u ~~~ pv 3 Q4 _ ~~~~_ w ~~~~~ e ~~ E 1 (j i~ t !a i! ~ !~ !, p!! x' f~ ~ ~f tf L'i 311t ~a a ~ ? ~ ~ 3 ; r ~Q ~ ~ a ¢¢ ~gi~g9g 2 R ~~ f ° e~ 3 53 e pp a e az g i~ S~ e5 a ~§ t i s ' c`x ~ HCE~345 ro %',~g~ 3~~ ~ q n we a x. .4 1, ~9 Y i F rya 5 p® ysy~ ~ S €g _~ p$6' '~ 3gyg F 9 W6 Y i iCd a ~5 f@ _ Y~5~5d Y~Yyg. g5 ~C 9~[~~%~~ 5 Y Y~ ¢ 0 9 ~ x- Bi ~ ~ ~ -`- ~a S .. b w ~ t ~ ~a a ~ - I I I I r 5 iS lei. ~ ppA e a Y ~ M ~r "s °e ~ $g I < ,Y P~FxF :, 6~ ~ t~ e ~ ~ ~ ~? ~a 4 ~e 6 e ~ §i W ~ ! i I ' ~ G; %`€"ea;4793..4 x: 0 0 00000 O 00 0000 W"~~' 11 m q;_._ C G&H-8 In - to _ .. ~ Q 6 u ~I 6 ' Q Q .. ~ '1 ~ 6 a 2 S _ .. .., ~ ~ W ~` _ /.'~b,°n U C Z °F _ 1=ate"• • ~'.., yFC a l jfl F e ~a Y LL ~ W $§[ - R ~0/ ~ e ~YAt \``\~~\~ .1 -~ H U V u ]O m~3'°y rl ~/~ Y V ~ ~.~ ~ Y H' I < H i n` ~ ~Q - - ei ~ ~~..~' y~ ~ i' ~~~V ~-~~e, { a ~~t.. ~,. ~e @ £~ ~ - ~ ~ ~. to r~; ~' ~. , ..f~~ x "`a t Nu. _ _ - E ~ y~`*v. - - ~S '~"~ - ~ ~ may " i. _ PE_ ~ I~ fi _ .ut ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ - ~t ~_ m . ' s ~ it ~.," Fad ci ~ P € pry ~ ~ e ~' ~ • ' t - - ~~+ '~'"~ - - - - i~ ., ;,~ ~ gi? ~" "' ~ a _ ,,rye i; '~ 6 S ~ 3 ~,° - ~ ~`d~ ---- {,tyc --- ~'r aka ---- ~` ;..; _ '="Eg8 o s i ~ ~ ~'s 6 8 - :~ ~ --- ~' a t ~~~~~,'i ~ ~' ' ~ -~i~ ' i 3 8- I L `.'y.}~5,~S. ;''°.~.5 _ _I - i'~. - - K.L3 ~ ~- _ ~ r~ _ ~ -~ _ ~ I I r srz- -ee- ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ g g 5s ' e., ~?~ ~'~~. +,.~"k3, li'~.a_~`k ~ ~ 'k' iELx._ n ' Ak S¢. P~4~T~e rv~+''`rI g ~ ~ ~e 3 ~~ [ 9 .,~.~ . I. I I I f l ~I I I~ I I e~i ' I I Y s e~ ~s ~ g °~ 3 ~_ - F }g3 a: ~ g~H6 -~... . ___ -- _.._. __ __ - ___-_ -_ __ _____ _ s . 3 - __ __ _ _ _ .- - - N t ~._: - _. ... vp _ -s'€E: -_- -r ~- ~ ~ - --"°-`==_ -_- - - -r=~-- >_ _ -_ --- - -- :' o O 00000 U 00 0009 . _ ° _e~o .i ' _. °".`, r ..._-ire - :._ ...ro-;=-.: - .• ~ rdL = _ _ _..§ u A ~ ~;Y S 5s oa U • ~f - = ~s - _ =~- - - ~ -_ ~ - -- - ggR --~ ~ - - - - G&H-9 _ ~ • yml \ ~\• / / • b ' $ - .. [} Y° S~ YF _~ _ _ _- _ _ - -. _ 6 a .6 5 . . 9~ _ ~ _ - - _ - _ 6 - _ E§ . -- --- -- = - - P - --- - -_ - _ __... _. __.:-_ __ - - _ ~~ ~ .-k . ~ _ 3 ~ .:'.- .~,. : .:.. .:.._ . .4 , -: ._ . _~.~_ o. _-- . _ - . . _ .._. - . . _ W [3 r Z < : w s ` a~ ~. ~ aa3 ~ =Y cQ~ [ 2 2 e U ~ O ° :~i~syl '~ ` tl ~ ,e a bl ~ ~ ? i U ~ F p Q i~ 11 ~~ ~~ ~ ~'~ ~~ e ` YYYYYYO ~ =S l S [ pp O ' W 6 u IeI I2 ' \ yy g~~! Y~ YS [ Z TS7> fff ~~ F~Y ~9Y 37:~e1a _~ y bfb t ~ <6u m I'o_ ~y p 5 2 3 4 ff 1 O W ~ d' i b ` \ `F F3 d ~ ~ ~ ae `: ~ Y: 2 ~ ~ e ~ LL K O `~" 'i! q$!599 ~?gag §''=~4~~ vs~~Sps~~ o n o o~ / R~ ~ , z 9~ e 9 9 Q v- 6i a~ g~€ Yv i s d? 3 5 ~_ e ~ L,3 . =i ~'~ u i ,~e~.. t~p~t~} sY4}fYpi.x~y s~p~~ e_ i I ~~`\\• /. P ~• \ ~ 9~ 4 8 ~ 8 9: 8{ 4 S6 A g Y ~~ S ~ I '~ ~ ' a: /1~ ~; / ~ 2 «y'~ ov " <: v L. L~~ ~ }} p~ / ~ t ~ I I r ~N(~U~ 45~"1"r I' •/ _..f ~ M i.4.b \ '~:~~ as.rt.,k,`.,`t;cv.4.=' ..B:~F _:-: Fi.~~~•''~'~;~,.~" / l .•, y~pi4 \•. ~ ~ki1C~T.c~?:~'r'..~5~4$':.i ~o,5s'-"%<.mw.';e"eS~4 .:'+s ,r-. _ .~%~~Q '~ . ~• . 'i tt ~'ai ia..• S3,C. _^,:I:.~ ~K ~,gv. % "11• / ~\`~s,`°'b, \~\ ~'-~` lt \' ~ i i i~ ~ i ~~ ;4g a. ~_ I 'I I~~I I/I v~ I I I ICI I 'II '~ ~ a°p~i .. _. _ _ _ __ ~• ~• -- ~,....a,...,.~._ . q , • ~a " - - ". ,e ,e ~e . - n ~-•.:'-... ...~ :SQ ~ - ~\-~~ "per maa~in.. m• \ q` .. iY. _ r,4 1_'• • ~, ~ _ 3.4 - _ g~~ - §p9 ~- ~ •. 7.1T ~: a ~ N/Sb'9 b'/t101~//1 ~ „~ . G&H-10 p - i ~ i i Y ~ i p 9 8 = r ~ ~€ [°~ e e p ~ Q 8 g p ~~ ~ g3 B ~F~se S. ~ & G ' ~ 03 e 7 i ~. e Cr a~Ga e~•87 ~ $¢g~ wv ~-° ~ ~d q ~r~9 r~(o e e °. baes3 se$gge ]4 :~ gP~~g.r ~g_=6E.~ 4 p °~~~ ~g r.' 8e e~ ~~~3e ~pgpg~ ypkY Pcct Yr~ggi MY`f € ~ r 3~ 4 8 9 6 8: §? F 8E H 8~ 9$ n o O C70P000 O 00 OC7CJ0 u ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 a , W ~ s Be I ~~ ,, Y°~, y~ J m J- /// I ~~ ~~ ~~ I; I~ I I L' I I!~ ~ ~ 6 I i III I i Q .j Q Z Z Q d Q 6 j ~ W 6 a '~ o U ~~.°a Q '"fz ! ~WU' C~ Y a Oyu R' a 6 ~ W a 0O ~ V_ F ~ U U ~ I ry ~ e ~ I I r I ., .I I $ ~ m~ I I Qc `' -- a= m Q z N~ ~ O &~ i y3 ~~ "~ i § ~~ ~ m .~ e~ P; _ , ;~: - r 1 °' I ~ ~ ~l ~~ I ~ QI s I " I ~ 1 ~.% "~ ~ e d Em "-3W ~~o w i i ( ~ , i i rryy oge I ~ ~ _~'L i ~~ „;~~ ~ ~ t Gi^ t °I I ~ u ~* ~~d Og ~ GE . i ga ~~ .4 °~° b U!~ 6~`L ~ I ~ ~ I o I ~ ~ o~ss i I i I ~ ~ i i~ 1 i~~ W T \ rt~ ~I ~ i i~ i -~ -- ~ ~, S ~ I \ ~ II t 1 ~~ I _ i _- _ ~ f ' i . .; w ~ ~ .e .'; ~ -- - , _ _ _i _ :j . _ ~y .., .. • • • G & H- 11 um nim! vwuor~ ~ _ - _l .....m._~i.,. 6wuueld /a~nloaUymy adeosPue~ m.i-, Y3fIHA U(-fl e ~ ~ i ~ y~ z M _ dno~~ u6isap ~ ~.. 30YHO1S /VH SOVOHSSOtlO ~ J u ~ M s~~oM ,Cliunwwo~ n~2.v.u„mmv~s ~ ~ ~4 ~ ~ 6 • ~J ~5E ~~~ ~ r~ 6 P 3 ~8 'U ~ ~ c~ Y"f]~~ ~:zr/ <GI V w G ~~a/ j ~:~ // ~~ ~ 'x ~ c o~ ~e ~_.~a~ U 3'~~. AeS 2 ~ ~ a YYb€f_ a ~p ip q ~j ~gy P ~ } ~ p@~~~§~ c4 fi i3 Yn 1~ ~4 ~9 yyaa ~CA'~4i ~96~ ~ d~3~z ~88 i i i ~ z ~ ~ 9 i J ~ / / , i iS --_ V \ O __ ~ N k EXHIBIT D G&H-12 \\\ oa h~~~ Kisco woo- ay"'.u: A'."'b...~a JAI tl SN~~tl~Ol~~ laryl s P81mR711Y,' ~.IPII-7® o.arn ry °wm+oxe'.in`~e„ d > ~ ~ :JNIkl33NI`JN3 OO"ItlN06 3rJVkfO1S Ad SOVOkiSSOtl:J o a 4 • • EXHIBIT E ~~ ]n ~~ N ~ ~~ O :0 ~~ h 1 . ~ P ~ ^ i- rn v. orrrn ~ __ 8 ; _ i .rlc cs wvre o _ ~ p j I °s - - a"g" ° ~ g ~ I + ~ § I s '. ~$ ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~, ,. ~ ~ i e ~~ : 9 ~ I o ~ ~ ~ t y j 1 i,rn x-a war~e~. I :~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 - ~ I ~ ~ ~ ° 1 ~ ~ I e i 8 ~ i o ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~~ 8 s ~ ~ m ~ ' s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ ~8 & ~ s ~ f ~ , ~ I e ~ qIm ~ $ ; -! ~m i ~ ~ ~ S ~ I § m ~ 1 g i ~ ~ . ~ _ - o J m 1- , _~__ YISL$W316~ m g ~ ~ ,-r K,~~ ~ ' ~ ~~ o g ~ J 1 _ ~ $ ~ ~ ~' ~ a ,• S - 3 ~/ :~ .'s ~ r / / . 'j j $ ; / ~/ 'e ~ 9/ ~ 6b ~ " ~ / / / $ b p _~$ / / <, a / I a s f'Y~ n////bb _ sj/ 8 5 I ze\ q~ \ 6 ~ j $ a $ 7 ~ i $ ~Q ~ / ~I ~ zl I ~ ~ e /$ R ~ B g _ ~ ~' ~I ~I I ~ ~ o a I ~ m -~ - !y !! U a o ~ - z a e g ' z o j j ';-vlv',a owdi'~e 33s J m i I m m G&H-13 ~ \~ a ~. •on\\ \ H o, a Nv~d s~nlia~lne ; . Y i AM 4 IYV'~~JOJ~'JW~?Q ua3]Pa3~B {'IVO~e'B MYV]RU6 ~vierw a+n~~ au~mn 6 \ \ ~ y C +` :JNki33NFJN3 OO~VNOB 3`JVFJOIS Ad SOVOdSSOkiO o 3 4 ~ ~ ~_ i ~ 3 Y Fv/D ~ WP VIB 3 3a Y 9 " -• ~~ 6 ~ - Q, 0 _ 6 . . ~ ~'4 =.. ~ , - - .I ° a°+ 'e j 1 _ - v ~ ~ £ ~ ' { ~ ~ ° I 8 I a . I P j ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ p ~ o - ° II I ° ° ~ ~ @ I R ~ I ~ ~ ~ .. ~ „ o - ~ ° ~ / I ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ R 111 ~~~ s ~ ql _ ~ ~ i ~ r _ ~ ~ 5 R ~ H x ~ a~ ' ~ _1 7 J ~ c ~ - e ~ ~ R Y ~ e , _I j ~ ~ ~ q I V Z ~ I n ry i_ i q J i ' I ! . i ) 1 ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~. } ~ f ~ ( m D~ n ~ 7 ~ v{ - ° ~ ~ W ~ I I I _ ~ ~ a ~ ° ~ R i-a~-~ ~ _ A _ .. _ _ ~ rv 3 ~ ~ I{ - ~ ~ I 7 'd ~ ~ .. r -. a ~ _ _ . m - I ry ~~ l ° - R i I ~ ~ o ° $ i i~ ~~ ~ 8 ° ~ ~ • _ • ~ W ~, A~ R R R r T~ $ n _ ~ s f } } ' ~ P ~ __--- m ° - A R ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~~ ~' g D _ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ A A ~ ~ .~~ 3 8 5~ ~ .. ~ "s I I ~ II ~ z ~ IL z ° _ .. _-___ ----_ ~ ' "a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ g _ o o m o m ~-1-Q-1~I~l--h-J~J~J-~-a~ ......_ ......................._..,........................ ................__...._ ~ J m • • G&H-14 ' ~ ~ I _ SNOI1VM1313 SOMOllfl6 ' _ ~ •~\~~\~\~\~~ + ~ U4iWU+IGSIh.~tYi~M92bf7u~~sl "yxvaavarR v'vacw=aa~.^aw~.uva`ws w'.,.xww'roa~r.v r,~„~x ,'8 9 ; Raa v ~6 •~ ~ ~ ' a ONIk1~3NION3 Oa"1VN09 30VkiO1S Ali SOVOlfSSOHO `:. ~~. 's ~~ • • ~ ~ v ~ v (o °R C R :0 :9 F 4z r ~~F 1 :, LS jy6y ~Cg1 H ' : s2 tl~L B i~ 9 y 55 , d Z B ~sR ° i° ) tl i :re~ F i P !_ y jC~ ~ III Y~ W ~ -~ Cd - 1 I I a ~ ;I' hl ~ 5 z o ~ il I III F~ aYY _ . ~ SFF'tT ~' 6 --z,- ~ ~ w ~~ i ~~ ~ 4e i, ~ III .Qe`~ I I I,F z~i~ Z o :1 ~ . Ul yl 5 III ~4 I ' '~l~ d ~_ ''jS`~ m ~3 ~ ~ m Ssi~ ~ II I v o9 O F Sj- ; I I i6A~ '~ ~ Q $ 4 ~ 5¢g ~ O ; " I ~LY' III '^ =- W J W ~ Ilil'\ I ~ a 0 ~ _ J O • I ~~ I I W ~ N O n ' 9II w =e w w I -' ah 0 ~ 'I'I ji N a ~ I L ~ III I I I z sY _J o II iG m U I ,~ w I I I ~ ~-~ ~ ~ ~ I I , '., ° r___ ~ ICI II J ~ I I W O W ~ Q ~ I I W ~iN ~ J E J ~ VV Q Z fll I1 pp IIII l i J O O m I a ' I " ~ m w F w W ~ ~ 0 :9 CI W N Fe~r E t~fl I ~' a FY a :i ~ G 3 ' ~ ya I ~ W `!~ ~ '~ ~ r, j uYx ~ Iij w w ~ r ~ z a I ~ I~ ~~~ :; J i ¢ a ' y IIII' ~ ~ s - ~ z I~11.. I ~ e j w ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ s' ~ ~ ~~ y ~' m a~ e .~., :~ ~ ~ i m _ I II I,~~ ~ >~ ~ ~7 z -_- ~ ~~ __.1, 'al _ ~ -, I ~ J a r I o ` ~ ~,. z I~I~ ~ ~~ 5 ° a }~~ w, o II .III ~~' ~~~ ° ,~ ~V ' ~~ m ~ ~ ~i F w ~F~ ~ ~~ 6~~~gg z ~,? a a ~ c ~ ~53~3'~4 F ~ a ~ ~ a I I'I'I 1= ~~~ use ~ ~ I ~ w I II I m m w z z z o a o EXHIBIT F G&H-15 Lxoe . unoa - xvie aus 2a~\\~ -... im.~r .. ~~. .~, ,,. ...nuv~u.nu~ nn~wuna 3•JVtlO1SINIW SOtlOtlSSOU'J dll'J x xpvv Nom, z ~. e ~ e ;s es ~w~ .~ 3 ~e~ ~~ • EXHIBIT G G&H-16 • ~~ p$p~ 8$g i s ~ ~ ~ 33P g~yy~ pp Be~y$g3 mw94~4ai 2I~~~>~ 2"EEEE~~m Wey4g~~{ V~pj ~"ed@Q8 Wi$Y@ ,:P _ [P d ej • ¢a r~ F~ ¢o U ~ ~i / / \~ // \ \ ~ ~S c I \ / ~\ "W~ c:; ~ Y6 L_ A~ / SHbd r ~ ~J) -I- ~:^ / Leo I J ~ ~ 'r - - -I- _I ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I-_ i ~'~ a . - ~ , ~~h ~i °- '. ~ ~ ~ ~'. ~„ i . ~ ~ ~ - .. _I_ s - - - - ~ „ _I_ ~,. ~ ~ .~,® ~A -I- _ 'J- - ~,;,~ ~ '~ ~ i ~ _ __ ~ - - - I- -I- ~ h-~- ' ii I - - ~ ~ ~ ~ -_ I -i?F-r rl 11 " -~- . i ~ -.I a° _L _ _ J_ -iJ LZZ11JT1 ~ ~ ,~ ~i -I_ J_ 177TT1-r~lr . ~ ~ ~i ~: __ - - -_- -__- _Y ~. - i ~,.,,.. y ~~ \ ' ~ ~ ,~ .- ,. ~ -.. 3N 3tl11 .,. ~ , ~ i r ., '~~~ I \ i I II~I~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I ~~ III ~il~ I ~ I I I i I III . V'~ g l:"" _,. ~. P. " ,'._ .. ' 3NO35HHd HitM1910&" ."~_t, ~~'' _ ~~ ' ~' ...9 ; .. ~ . ~ NNV 03NOtlddtl 3NHl3tll3 ., ,.- ,.. L - ; it..; ,'' 9„ ;. ~' _ ^ _ / _ 3N03SVNtl MllM lllllB 9NV 03/~OHtltlY 553~9V 3tl13 A]N3983W3 ~ - ~1 ~~ y~ I • ~ ___I I EXHIBIT G&H-17 N/SN8 N/UOl~/ii "1 Q . Z w O u U o ¢ ] y0y U ~3~ U pfm U ~Qu n Z ~xQ Q ~ p6W % LL ~ p O C U F U ~ ~~- a Z O~a `N ,,H, vI w Q ,® N O \~ I=_-~ ~\~ Charles Joseph Associates PUBLIC/PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT SERVICES Crossroads RV & Storage -Phase II Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: August 20, 2008, 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm. Meeting presentation of project could not be formally presented, due to only one homeowner attending the neighborhood meeting. Available for review with the homeowner was: Phase I and Phase II full size colored landscape plans, and elevations, Phase I and Phase II Site Plans, and Building Materials Board. Her inquiry was concerning noise, due to the fact that her husband worked unusual hours, and usually slept during the day. Her main interest was the Phase I component, which was approved over 4 years ago. She was advised that Phase I facility operations will be consistent with City noise standards and will generate less noise than adjacent freeway. Mr. Buquet also pointed out that there would be a 14 foot wall around the Phase I project and will add as a barrier between Crossroads RV, Phase I and the existing homes. U ~XH'B'T I Office 909.481.1822 800.240.1822 Fas909.481•]824 • Ilan Llry Center • 10681 Foothill Blvd., Suite 395 • Rancho Cucamonga, C9 • 91730 A CALI~O]tNIA COFPORA'190N G&H-18 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:50 p. m. Donald Granger August 19, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of a master-plarined recreational vehicle and self storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Spape District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP) DRC2003-00048, a master plan for a recreational and boat storage facility on 9 87 acres of land at the intersection of the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway interchange, north of Victoria Street. At that time, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048; the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I with only Phase II being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Over the past couple of months, Planning Department staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a CUP application that will complete Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and caretaker residence, and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. • Design Parameters: The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the project site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. Access to the 3.6 acre parcel is from Victoria Street via an access road, west of the I-15 Freeway overpass. For Phase II, the applicant is proposing a total of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. The exterior elevations along the I-15 Freeway will match the style and rhythm of Phase I (stacked stone columns with arches, split-face block exterior, and fluted block at the top of the wall plane). Since the project is located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Area, the landscape palette and plant spacing along the east property line and in the planter areas on either side of the Fire Department's access road (near the west property line) are designed to meet the Fire District's Fuel Modification requirements. Along the Victoria Street frontage, in keeping with a low impact development and water sensitivity, the applicant is proposing rockscape, synthetic turf, and a drought tolerant plant palette. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. There are no Major Issues. • Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. EXHIBIT J G&H-19 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES August 19, 2008 Page 2 1. The applicant has not provided any conceptual sign locations. Given the proximity and visibility from the I-15 Freeway, staff requests that the Committee provide input regarding the location, size, and illumination of wall signs on the east elevation of Building B. Policv Issues:. The following items area matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the proposed project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson • Staff Planner: Donald Granger The Committee reviewed the project and recommended approval of the Site Plan and architecture with • the understanding that the applicant will return to the Design Review Committee at a future date to present a detailed sign package for review and approval. The applicant agreed to present a sign package to the Committee. The Committee also required that all lighting be designed to have glare shields, and that wall pack lighting be minimized in order to prevent light pollution. • G&H-20 F~. - ~e ~ -~lF }} Ail kF, 4 }'C? ~.b T H E C I T Y O F Q n N C l1 0 C U C A M O N C n Staff Report DATE: March 12. 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: - James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO INITIATE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5 of Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle storage facilities as a • Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048. BACKGROUND: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13.47 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street (Exhibit E). At the time the Planning Commission approved DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I, with only Phase II being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. Phase I is approximately 9.87 acres in size. The staff report containing the language stating that Phase II would require a separate Conditional Use Permit application and consideration is attached (Exhibit B). In conjunction with DRC2003-00048, a text amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan (DRC2003-00047) was also approved that included a resolution recommending approval of recreational vehicle and boat storage facilities within the Low Residential District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, if a site was not adjacent to single-family or multiple-family residences, and if the site was adjacent to both the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The text amendment was subsequently approved by the City Council on May 19, 2004. Over the past couple of months, Planning staff has been working with Charles Joseph Associates on a Conditional Use Permit application that will complete Phase II of the master plan (Exhibit E), the undeveloped 3.6 acre parcel. • ANALYSIS: Since the Planning Commission approval of DRC2003-00048 was limited to approval of Phase I, the applicant is proposing to submit a new Conditional Use Permit request to develop Phase 11. However, before Phase II can proceed, it is necessary to determine the EXHIBIT K G&H-21 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 2 most appropriate means for entitling the project given the existing land use designation and previous Planning Commission direction related to the project. At the time of approval of Phase I, the parcel was located in the Low Residential District, and Phase II was located in the Open Space District. As discussed above, the text amendment that was approved in 2004 is only applicable to the Low Residential District. Thus, there are two options that could be initiated that would appropriately entitle Phase II of the master plan under the present land use designation of Open Space. The two options are as follows: .Option 1 -General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Amendments: The applicant could propose a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and an Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment (ESPA) to amend the land use designation from Open Space to Low Residential, in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application. With this option comes the possibility that should the land use change be completed and the recreational storage facility not be constructed, the 3.6-acre parcel will remain residentially zoned. Given the immediate proximity of the parcel to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, Planning Department staff would not support a residential land use designation at this location. Accordingly, staff sees this option as being problematic. • Option 2 -Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment. The second option is to process an Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) Text Amendment to allow recreational and boat storage subject to a Conditional Use Permit within the Open Space District. Under this scenario, if the project is • not constructed, the land use will remain Open Space and the possibility of residential development is precluded. Staff would also recommend including a footnote to the final draft of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment that would read as follows: Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage is a Conditionally Permitted Use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. The addition of the footnote would preclude development of recreational storage facilities in other Open Space Districts that are not suitable sites for recreational storage facilities. With the text amendment and corresponding footnote, both the logical completion of the project would be permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit, and the potential residential development scenario that could result from a GPA and ESPA would be avoided. Of the two options, staff believes that Option 2 is the better choice since in the long term it will prevent a residential land use designation in a location that is not otherwise suitable for residential development given its immediate proximity to both freeways. Should the Planning Commission direct staff to initiate Option 2, the project will require the review and approval of the ESP Text Amendment by the Planning Commission with final consideration and action by the City Council. Initiating the_Specific Plan Text Amendment would allow staff to begin a thorough analysis and notify property owners of a public hearing to consider the amendment. Public hearings at both the Planning Commission and City Council will be required. Initiation does not presuppose an approval action. • G&H-22 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES March 12, 2007 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the proposed request, and through minute action, direct staff to initiate Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 as outlined in Option 2. Respectfully submitted, ~~ James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT: DG\ma Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B • Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G • u Letter of Request from Applicant dated November 14, 2007 Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 14, 2004, without Attachments Section 5 24.300 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map Site Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Landscape Plan for Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 Aerial photograph G&H-23 ENVIRONMENTAL " ,, . ~~ INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move /rom one line fo [he next Iine.J Planning Department (9~9) 477-2750 --- '~~i~`€ :.'7a K.P3jfri~~i: }j'.fy z;5:: :u`.-sii '; _~r.~,.i,+i' ~ ., ., 4t»:e,~'$w i~'Ir.i~l._*,.ia.: '°t ~`"->r:, ..: - - ~ -' s :~The:pii~Pose~of this form is to tnforrn'tFig City of the'bastc components ofthe-proposed - ~_pro~ect so~tfiat,the.Citymay reyiew.the;project.-p"ii ~suant to City rPolicies;;Ordinances;:and ^_ ~Gutdeltties, the,,Califo~nta Enrvironmental ~ Quality,"Act; and =the fCtty_'s .Rules and=: a...~ s ,~-F-r ,-' .;Procedures: foIm:plernent•,CE,QA, :z~lt;is~i~rnportant th~at~tFi~e' nforrriation requestedwin _tliis: ;application be ~provtded to full ~"` : [,{ ~} k,~k~, ,' er- ~~ ~` ,~5~", ~ " ~ -- , ,;- ,Upon evtew" of~the"icompleted Initial'IStudyw Partil ~and~the ~developtnen't apphcatton,- ~additibnal irifortnationsueh as; tint not ILmtted~to~,wtraffic, Horse, btologtcal, drainage; and - =geolog(cal:reports may tie ~`equiredr~~T#ie;project application will not be deemed complete - unlessahettdentified~spectal~studtes/reports4aresubmitted-for review-and-accepted as _- :completecand'adequate ,The;'projee~applica~ionYw II no ~ e scheduled for-Committees - 'review~unless~Iljregwred reports acresubm,~ttedwand,.deemed~complete for-staff to ," prepare the, Inttial,S~udy Part~,ll as re~gwred by C~EQA In addition to the f Img fee; tlie,,` ;applicant willrbe responsi~ le~to,pay oar re ~mburse`theaCity, tts agents, officers, andµ)or;' -'consultantsi~for~ ally costs +for' the t pr~eparation,'review, analysts, recommendatwns, rrttigations,,~etc~;,of,any~special'studiesorr~eport"sl~+~,~~ ~ ~,,,~~. ~;~ ~a~`':'~z~.,~,,,~ ; _ :1i;~$"~~=: ,~ -. i ~..r~ N;.e`. ..Jl.+~ .~ .r, a~ac _....''i ~n t.. , iF INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that rtis the responsibility ofthe applicantto ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Numberfor the project to which this form pertains: Protect Tale. Crossroads RV & Storage Narne & Address of project owner(s): Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Rd Vlctorville, CA. 92392 Name 8 Address of developer or project sponsor. Bruno Mancrnelli 13109 Sagehen Rd Victorville, CA. 92392 EXHIBIT L Contact Person & Address: Chuck Buguet I ~\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTE R\Initial Study Partt.docl~g& 1 ~f '24 Rev. 3/17/04 Name & Address of person.prepanng this form (if different from above): Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Blvd. Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number: '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x l i) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show repmsentative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and n=presentative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Southwest of 210-15 Freeway Interchange. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet it necessary): 0228-011-38-000 '5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.). 3.6 '6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area o(public streets & proposed dedications): 3.6 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): Development district amendment to OS in Etiwanda Speclfc Plan self-storage as a Conditionally Permitted use in residential zone where site is generally surrounded by freeway and flood control channels. Scheduled for March 12'" 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental I:\PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study PaRl.docPage 2 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 G&H-25 • • • Information indicated by an asterisk (') is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff agencies in order to fully implement the project: Grading & Building Permits. • 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as ~t exists before the project including information on topography. soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the stmctures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, tragic studies): Currently vacant land with weedslvegetation on site There are no structures. See updated Biological Study and negative declaration was approved for general site area 2004 Approved RV storage facility to North exis-, ling 15 Freeway to the east. To the south existinq flood control & 15 freeway. To the west Is existin flood control channel & basin Site is continually disced for weed abatement purposes. • 10) Describe the known cultural and/orh~stoncal aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history). There are no known historical or cultural aspects on this site. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Imtial Study Partt docPage 3 of 10 Rev. 3/17/04 G&H-26 11) Describe any Horse sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses. Existing roadway and freeway noise that will not affect proposed use of property, and will serve to buffer existing residential to the North West. t 12) Describe the proposed project in detail This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro/ect. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Self vehicle storage facility consisting of surface storage stalls for surrounding community self storage needs. The project will be constructing 10' tall decorative wall which serve as a noise buffer of the existing residents to the northwest. • 13 aspects. Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity ofland use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ): North - 210 Freeway beyond RV Storage project South - 15 Freeway & existing Victoria St East - 15 Freeway West- Flood Control basin, beyond that Etiwanda School District 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? This project will enhance the area that is currently vacant land and provide buffer for existing residential. As intended with originally approved master plan. The property is currently zoned for residential Flood Control or Open Space. This project use will have less Impact then residential and is a needed use in area and will • ultimately be consistent with the RV Storage project to the north. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Partl.docPage 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 G&H-27 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount. Haw will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed • Short term construction noise only, no long term Impacts. '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees None 17J Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains. County of San Bernardino Flood Control Facility directly west of and ad)acent to project Approval from the Director of County Flood Control has approved our drainage to connect • 18J Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, p/ease contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct at 987-2591. a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ^~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 0 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER1lnitiai Study Partt docPage 5 of 10 Rev. 3/77/04 G & H- 28 21J Anticipated range of sale phces and/or rents Sale Price(sJ $ to $ Rent (per month) $ to $ • 221 Specify number of bedrooms by unit type ~ N/A 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing w~fhin the project Contact the appropriate Schoof Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a Elementary. b. Junior High ~ • a Senior High COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL. AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Self storage of personal Storage materials 26) Total Floor area of commercal, industrial, or inshtutional uses by type: 62, 964 27) Indicate hours of operation: Monday -Saturday 8 am to 6 pm 28) Number of employees: Total: 2 off-site @ caretakers unit Maximum Shift: 8 . Time of Maximum Shin 8: I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 6 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 G & H-29 29) Provide breakdown of anticipatedfob classifications, includurg wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet i(necessary): Caretaker which will also be office manager for both projects with occasional off-site maintenance workers for . facility. 30) Estimation o(the number ofworkers to be hired that currently reside in the City: 2-3 '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): None that require a special permit. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine theirability to providE adequate service fo the proposed prolect~ 1(so, please indicate their response. • All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services to the project 33) • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Inrtial Study Partl.docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3117/04 G&H-30 34J Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No 35J The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Frsh and Game fee The pro/ect planner will con(mr which /ees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director heanng: l hereby certify that the statements fumrshed above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best olmy ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct / best of my knowledge and belief: I /urther understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date. 3-4-OS Signature. Title: President u • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Imlial Study Parit docPage 8 of 10 Rev. 3I17I04 G & H- 31 • 1. View from • I S freeway. G & H - 32 2. View of project entry. • s.: ~,~ ~.. ______ _ View of Project entrance facing north along Flood control toward basin and • • G&H-33 existing residential. 4. View of new bridge crossing east into site phase 2 from west side of channel. • • • G&H-34 ._ [t ~-'? ~p precway .__ .__ _._ _._ .__.`-cY ~ ' i (I i rnQY 1 G~~p ~, i, ~ 4 ------ i___A_ ~2 -D_ ~~ J'r; _____ ~___ ~:' ~~ ~m. ..'4 '_ .~ _ __. ~ o ~ ~§ N ~ ~ - - ~: ~F, rd 5: s ~ O r' '_IY~ V~ Q Q i o° ~ U ~~ ~vci9 .F ~2 2 T U .~~ ,~ r b~~ ~j „~ ,~.i ,~•. )' 3 - ~ - .~~ / ~ _ ~/CTOR/A STREET x x -I~~ C 5 _o~'~ W ~$ •f'% ~~~ ~~ws P.• G~:~ OSn3i 5' i Q 3.°~u° tb: A. ~„_~ ! N~ %° p - a ¢ =ac5.: U i _i a 95' ~ :~ i" ~6 ~ ~, ~s ¢, `P r~ • G & H-35 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 2. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5, Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to construct Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 Freeway and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange - APN: 0228-011-38. Related Files: Conditional Use • Permit DRC2003-00048 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. The proposed project is Phase II of a recreational vehicle and self-storage facility located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Access will from Victoria Street, then north on access road, across a bridge over the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, then into the project site. Fire Construction Services has reviewed and approved the. emergency access plan. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli, c/o Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Flood Control/Utility Corridor 6. Zoning: Open Space 7. Surrounding Land Uses, Setting and Background: On April 14, 2004, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048, a master plan for atwo-phase development of a recreational and boat storage facility on 2 parcels of land totaling approximately 13 4 acres, located on the west side of the intersection of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways, north of Victoria Street. At the time the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2003-00048, the entitlement was specifically limited to approval of Phase I (9.8 acre parcel), with only Phase II (3.6-acre parcel) being indicated as a conceptual layout for future development of the site. The applicant is now seeking an entitlement for Phase II of the master plan. Phase I of master plan consists of 165 covered storage spaces, 278 open spaces, a 1,200 square foot office and • caretaker residence and a 1,800 square foot detail area for recreational vehicles and boats. Phase II consists of 393 self-storage units that will vary in square footage. G&H-36 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 2 As noted above, the proposed project is Phase II of a recreational vehicle and self-storage facility, located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned protect, a recreational vehicle storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Across the flood control channel and northwest of the project site are single-family dwelling units. The subject site is vacant with no improvements. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this protect, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quafity (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning (/) Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems (/) Mandatory Findings of DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: • • u Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-37 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 and ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 Page 3 ~~~ I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the protect have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared E Date: `~ 1 Reviewed • • Rev. 3/13/07 Date: ~ G & H-38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 4 Less Than SigmLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pote"eaoy SigrnLCan~ w"" MLLigabon Than 9grnficant No Impact Incomoratetl Impact__ Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? O O O (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. C~ b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. The project site is vacant. There are no State Scenic Highways within • the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The proposed protect is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the protect site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on the site plan, which requires review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing or indirect lighting to avoid glare. The lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination within the protect site and be compliant with foot candle limits. The impact is not considered significant. • Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-39 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 5 • Less Tnan Sgnnicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Fetan~ially Sgm6cant wm MitigaLOn than Signdman~ No Impact Inrorporatetl Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project is located at the confluence of the Eastbound I-210 and Southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest • of the protect site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the Victoria Basin, and to east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the protect site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. The nearest agricultural use, asmall- scale nursery, is located more than 1/2 mile southwest from the from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 6 Less Than SignAicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pmantiaiy Sgm4cant w"° MlbgaLOn Tnan Slgnihcant No Impact Incor oratetl Impact Impact 3. AIR DUALITY. Would fhe project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the O O (/) ( ) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () (/) ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantfal pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: r 1 I. J a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to • the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aproject-specific basis. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared . that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 methodology to evaluate construction and operational emissions. As shown in Table 8, the unmitigated emissions associated with construction of the protect are below the regional significance thresholds. For operational impacts, a daily trip rate of 38.37 trips per acre was applied to the protect site, resulting in 136 average daily vehicle trips. With an estimated trip length of 9 miles, this equates to 1,221 vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Table 10 indicates that the unmitigated emissions associated with the operation of the project are below the regional • significance thresholds. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 7 • Lass Than SginUCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppfennany SigniLCant Wnh Miogaoon than Bignihcanc No Impact Incpmoratetl Impact Impact TABLE 8 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction Activity ft0G NOx CO SDi FM-10 Total PM-10 Equip. Exh. PM-10 Dust pM-2.6 Grading (2008) 3.6 28.1 14 8 0.0 19.0 1.4 17.6 5.0 Assembly& Finish (2009) 23.0 314 27.2 0.0 2.2 2.11 0.1 2.0 SCAQMD Threshold 75. iDO. 550. 160. 160. - -- 66. lavaes ~uu trucR tunes of Dmiding matenal delivery per day • TABLE 10 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) Source ROG NOx CO 50x PM~10 PM-2.6 Opcraoonal (Veh¢IC) Fmission Estimates 1 0 1.5 13.3 0 0 L I 0 4 Aiea Source Emission Estimates" 1 6 1.6 14 9 0.0 1 0 4 Total. Opemeonal r Area 2 6 3 1 ?8 2 0 0 41 0.8 SCAQMD AOndicance Threshold SS v 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Thresholtl Q) No No No No No Na %of lfireshold 48% 56% 51% 00% 1,8% 15% Enel9y consumption, landscape mmntewnce, etc Source URBEMIS2U07 Air puahty Nodel; Output In Appendix C~ J Rev. 3/13!07 G&H-42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 8 Less Than SigmLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pptamially Sgnibcant wnn Mdigauon Tnan Sigm6cant No Imoan I~oropratetl Impact Impact In addition, localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were adopted by the SCAQMD in 2005. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to exceeding one of the most stringent federal or state ambient air quality standards at the nearest receptor. LSTs are set based on ambient concentrations in the project area, and the distance to the closest sensitive receptors. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. The URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality impact study includes a localized analysis. Local construction emissions are shown in Table 9. As Table 9 illustrates, the mitigated emissions associated with the construction of the project are below the localized significance thresholds. TABLE 9 LST Pollutants Concentration Data for Constructions (pounds/day) Central San Bernardino Valley' CO NO, PM-10 PM4.5 LST Threshold 1,188 258 14 6 Proposed Project 1 5-27 28-31 2-3~ 2' Disturbance area of 7 ave Rr(crenrnd slalion - Nonhwest San gernardmo Valley (72) at 50 meters from probed site Wtlh mi0gabon Therefore, as required by the SCAQMD, an URBEMIS 2007 study was performed to calculate project emissions, and the model results indicate that construction and operational emissions of the proposed project would not be significant. The construction and operational emissions of the project are below regional and localized significance thresholds for criteria pollutants as indicated in Tables 8 and 10. With the imposition of mitigation measures, the impacts to LSTs are less-than-significant (Table 9). The full text and citation of the URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality study can be referenced at the end of the Initial Study Part II. Even though the construction emissions will be less than regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures in order to reach less-than significant levels for LSTs, and per the City's General Plan FEIR in order further reduce actual emissions: l J • 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. Contractor shall ensure that all • construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 9 • Less Then Spmucant less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Spm6cant with Muipauon roan Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,p) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. l J 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 10 Less Tnan Sigmbcem Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppta^nauy Sigmbcant wan Mwgaaon Tnan SigniLCant No Impact Inco~oorete0 (moan Impact 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. Even though the operational emissions will be less than regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures per the City's General Plan FEIR in order to further reduce actual emissions: 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • • 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development would contribute • to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 11 • Less Than Spmhcant~ less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pwen„aoy S,gn,LCarn wnn Mmganpn rna~ Sipn,l,cant No Irtpacf Incciporatetl Impact Impact ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. See also discussion, analysis and mitigation measures under b) above. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is Located within 1/4 mile of a sensitive receptor (Etiwanda High School). Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, recreational storage vehicles and self-storage facilities do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • J 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (/) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local . or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Rev. 3/13/07 G & H- 46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 12 Less Than Sgndicam. Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 aman"ally Sigmhcant w„h Mmgaiwn Than 9lgnli,canl No Irtpact Inco oretetl I act Impact f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The protect site is located in an area developed with a variety of land uses, Including a retention basin, single-family dwelling units, and the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; however, in order to ensure that there are no impacts to special-status or sensitive species, a General Habitat Suitability Evaluation Report was prepared by Ecological Sciences. Biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to evaluate on-site habitats and their ability to support sensitive species by walking a series of transects over portions of the site. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered or otherwise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. • No special-status plant species were detected during the reconnaissance survey. There were some special status plant species that were not observed during the reconnaissance • survey that have aloes-moderate to moderate occurrence potential (Plummer's mariposa lily, Perry's spineflower and Robinson's peppergrass). However, according to the report, none of the plant species that have been assigned a low-moderate to moderate occurrence potential have been assigned any formal state or rarity designation. If the plant species were present, development of the site would not likely result in the elimination of CEQA-significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis, according to the habitat evaluation report. No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on-site, but several species not observed during the survey have a moderate or high occurrence potential, such as loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit and desert wood rat. However, these species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered and have been removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Potential impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habit locally, neither of which would be significant, according the biologist's report. Site development would not likely eliminate significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potential), they are likely uncommon on such a small and isolated site (e.g. coastal western whiptail, San Diego horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, and Los Angeles pocket mouse). As such, development impacts would not likely constitute a significant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within Southern California or their overall range. No direct observations or evidence of Western Burrowing Owls were observed on the • project site, but the occurrence potential is considered low-moderate. Although the Burrowing Owl Is not protected under Federal or State endangered species acts, it is Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 13 less Than SigniLCanv Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pare^oally sgnd¢am wpm Muiganon rnan signnmam ruo I an Incomora~etl Imoacr Impact protected under the Migratory Bird Treat Aci of 1918, and the CDFG, which prohibits the take, possession or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. Since California ground squirrel burrows were observed on-site and can potentially accommodate owls, the report recommends that an owl survey be completed if the site preparation activities occur during the nesting season. According, the following mitigation measure shall be adhered to. If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. The report concludes with the following summary Results of the General Habitat Suitability Evaluation conducted in February 2008 indicate that habitats present on the +/- 13-acre site [Phase I and Phase II) generally represent lower biological resource values based on the degree in which impacts to • on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present because of development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special status-species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact designated critical habitat. The site would also not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special status species. Further, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87 acre northern parcel) was previously entitled and approved for development by the City on April 14, 2004. Fundamentally, after development of northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining 3.6-acre southern parcel (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining project site (3.6-acre southerly parcel) would be ostensibly reduced. With the incorporation of the mitigation measures listed above, the impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 14 Less Than $IgplflCapl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Peienaa~ly Sipmhcant wnh MmgaLOn Tnan Sigmfcant No Impaq IncofporateE Impact Irroact d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. It is highly unlikely that the subject site occupies an important location relative to regional wildlife movement. Also, see the discussion under b) above. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed prolect is not in conflict with any local ordinance. The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plari FEIR (Section 511). The City of Rancho Cucamonga contacted the San Bernardino County Museum and requested that a review of the museum's database be performed for archaeological, historic or cultural resources. The City of Rancho Cucamonga received correspondence from Ms. Robin Laska, Assistant Center Coordinator for the museum, stating that the occurrence potential for Prehistoric Archaeological Resources, Historic Archaeological Resources, Historic Resources is Low, and the occurrence potential for Cultural Landscapes and Ethnic Resources is unknown. Accordingly, no further archaeological investigation is necessary. Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor • construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 15 • Less Than Sgmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pofen,ially Sgmficant with Mpigation Than Signihcanf No Impact Incorppratetl Impact Impact • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the • sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2. Also, see discussion under b) above. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Paget 6 Less Than Sigm6canf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Fofemiany SigniM1Canl Wrth M¢iga0on Than S~gndicant No ' Impact Ineomoraletl Impact Impact • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed protect Is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Publfc Resources Code Sectfon 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation fs required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as O O O (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? O O O (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments • • a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in • the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Buried/Uncertain segment of the Red HIII Fault Red Hill Fault, passes within approximately 2 miles northwest Rev. 3/13/07 G&N-51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 17 • Less Than Sgmhcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: se~ioarrc MitlpdL00 sig ni oam Ne Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impart of.the project site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 1/2 miles to the north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to M„, 7.5 earthquakes is approximately 7 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„ 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 9 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than- significant levels: t) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMto emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3. Tujunga soil types are characterized by slow to very slow runoff, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Unprotected soil will blow, and water capacity is 4 to 5 inches. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tulunga Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3. Tujunga soil types are characterized by slow to very slow runoff, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. Unprotected soil will blow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-52 . Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 18 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppfenaally SignNCant Wnh Mmgavon Than Signmcant No Impart - Incorporated Impact Impart 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or _the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. u b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered afull-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developidg an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 19 Less Than S,gmLCant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fptanoany SigniLCant wnn Mibpatipn Tnan Sigmhcanl Np Impatl InCpmpr8letl Impact Impact Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) Etiwanda High School is located approximately within a 1/4 of the protect entrance and about 1/2 mile from the project site. Typically, the recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. u g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Fire Protection District has adopted Ordinance 39 and, by extension as cited in Ordinance 39, the 2001 California Fire Code as the governing documents by which Fire Construction Services, the plan check arm of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFD), establishes guidelines and policies. In Ordinance 39, Section 8, governs the Fire Department Access, which refers to Article 9 of the 2001 Fire Cade and the RCFD Standards for Fire Department Access. Since the project includes only one point of access, approval of an alternative method from the Fire District is required in order for an exception to be granted. - The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the project only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 1031.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method, consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005. The State of California recently modified its Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps, which the City adheres to. Accordingly, the landscape palette will adhere to the planning spacing and palette requirements. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 20 Less Than Sipnd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP 9 Pp~anuanr swnihLani wpm M~tipallpn man spndmam Np Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere O O O (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (/) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) • • Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial actroity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water • Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 21 • Less Than Signil¢anl Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Polanuallr SIBNIICdnI wnn Mnigatwn Than Signi6canl No IRgaCI hICOl00IdIPd Tpdtl Irroacl Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP). To comply with the NPDES, the project construction • contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008), that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping, can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erasion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to • control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods Rev. 3/13/07 G& H-56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 22 Less Tian SiBniLCarn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Patemiany SibmLCant wifn Mrtipagon rnan Signil¢ant No I act IncorPOrafetl Impact Irtpact experienced in southern California; and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water duality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing • the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge. Although the Victoria basin is adjacent to the project site, the proposed project will not interfere with groundwater recharge. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, it would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, the CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage channel will not be disturbed, nor will the flow of the channel be altered. The • access bridge will be an overpass that will not alter flows. Runoff from the project will be collected into catch basins, conveyed into RCP pipe, and then discharged into the concrete lined channel. The applicant will be required to obtain all necessary permits from Rev. 3/13/07 G & H- 57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 23 Less Than Sgnd¢anf Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potentially Slgnlhcam w~fh Mlllgauon rnan SigniLCanf No Impact Incorporaletl Impact ImpaCf the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new bufldfng and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine drainage channel will not be disturbed, nor will the flow of the channel be altered. The access bridge will be an overpass that will not alter flows. Runoff from the project will be collected into catch basins, conveyed into RCP -pipe, and then discharged into the concrete lined channel. The applicant will be required to obtain all necessary permits from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or sfltation on- or off-site, and the runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The protect will not result in substantial • additional sources of polluted runoff. A grading and drainage plan, along with a Water Quality Management Plan that identifies Best Management Practices that will reduce pollutants, must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, it is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identification of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that • this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 24 Less Tftan Signnicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pp g P°'enaally signmcanc w"" miegaoon Than slgmhcant No Impact Incprporatetl Impact Impact g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. Further, no housing units are proposed with this protect. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. All water will be captured and conveyed into storm drain facilities, ultimately connecting to the San Sevaine Drainage Channel. No adverse impacts are expected. r~ LJ There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes • several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the pro/ect: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the confluence of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeways. Immediately to the south is the I-15 Freeway, and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. To the west, across the San Sevaine Drainage Channel, is the'Victoria Street Basin, and to the east is the I-15 Freeway. Approximately 200 feet northwest of the protect site, across the flood control channel, are single-family dwelling units. This protect is Phase II of a master- planned recreational vehicle and self-storage storage facility. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The protect site land use designation is Flood Control/Utility Corridor. The proposed • protect is Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility that was approved in 2004. A concurrent application for an Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 25 • Less Than Signdsant Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources: PP 9 Fotanuaoy 99rn1¢ant With MiOgatmn Than S,gmLCant No Impact Inco orated Impact Imoad Amendment was filled by the applicant to permit recreational vehicle and self storage facilities in the Open Space District, subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The General Plan identifies Open Space Districts as having "limited development potential." The location of the project at the confluence of a freeway interchange is suitable for a storage facility. As such, the proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses. For additional information, see also the discussion under Biological Resources, a) above. • 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () (/) ( ) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () (/) ( ) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The project site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan, Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1. The small size of the site (3.6 acres) and access through residential areas makes mining impractical and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery because of conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surface mining operations. Conversely, the open flood control basin to the west offers greater aggregate mining opportunities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The project site is partially designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area, Resource Sector A-7 of the Lytle Creek Fan, according to the City General Plan, Exhibit IV-1 and Table IV-1. The small size of the site (3.6 acres) and access through residential areas makes mining impractical and offers limited potential for aggregate recovery because of conflicts between surrounding sensitive residential uses and typical surface mining operations. Conversely, the open flood control basin to the west offers greater aggregate mining opportunities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. • 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 26 Less Than SgniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppfentlally Signlhcarn wnn MitlgaLpn man Slgndlcant No Impact Incorypraletl Impact Impact c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public arport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • Comments: a) The project site is ,within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards (adjacent I-15 Freeway traffic noise) according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out; however, the proposed project is aself-storage facility and will not expose persons to long-term noise levels in excess of standards stated in the Development Code. People will only be • at the site for temporary periods to load and unload personal property. Exposure to noise levels from the I-15 freeways will be short-term while personal property is loaded and unloaded, and noise will be reduced by the building wall planes. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Self-storage facilities normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed self-storage facility will not significantly increase traffic; hence the project is not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall • report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then Rev. 3/13/07 G & H- 61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 27 • Less Than 9gmficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s9w~oalm M. 90~pn sigrnncanr Np Impact Incprporatetl Impact Impact construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. • f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed protect will have a limited number of employees (on-site caretaker in Phase I); hence it will not create a demand for additional housing. , No impacts are anticipated. b) The protect site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. • Rev. 3/13/07 G&N-62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 28 Less Than Signtlmant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g °ptentiauy signdmam w"° Mingafion Than sigmhcam No Impact Incomorafetl Impact Impact 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other I performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protection? O O O (~) b) Police protection? () () () (~) c) Schools? O O O (~) d) Parks? O O U (~) e) Other public facilities? O O U (~) Comments: a) The site, located from an access road off Victoria Street, would be served by Fire Station 176, located approximately 2 1/2 miles from the project site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. 'Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will • be placed on the project so that impacts to fire services will not occur. The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the project only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 103.1.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop. to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; and (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 1/2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. , • e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 29 • Less Than ii Sgrnhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Ppfemially SgniM1Cant Wnh MLLigaOpn Than Signnicant No Impact Incpfppmfetl Impact Impact construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which will lessen the impacts to library services. I~ 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located 2 1/2 miles from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park development fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 30 Less Than S~Bmiicam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Pplpmmliy Signilicant wm M6igallon Than 9gnilmanl No ' ^Ipad DCOIppm~etl Impact mDHtI d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or Incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? O O U (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? CJ Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 110 average daily trips. The proposed project includes the development of a 393-unit self-storage facility. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each storage unit will generate .28 average daily vehicle trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in protect design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, • gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Modet estimates that each storage unit will generate 03 two-way peak hour trips, resulting in 12 two-way peak hour trips. In November of 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement protects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to the issuance of a building permit. The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming • uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 31 • Less Than Signd¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 Pptenoally signd¢am With Muigaoon Than signrt¢ant No Impatl OCONO~atatl Rlpacl hMap e) The applicant applied for an "Application for Alternate Method" because of the protect only having only one access point. The Fire Construction Services staff (Senior Plans Examiner and Plan Check and Inspection Manager), acting in accordance with Administrative Section of the 2001 Fire Code, Section 103.1.2, have reviewed and approved an alternate method, consisting of (1) providing fire lane access loop to north side of project; (2) increasing fire sprinkler density by one hazard group; and (3) Install additional hydrants and secondary emergency access route. With the inclusion of the Alternate Method, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: ', a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or O O O (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the protect, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O O O (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 G & H- 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 32 Less Tnan Signmcam less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP g Pn~an„allY Sgnihcan~ Wad Mnigaoon Then Signdicant No Impact Incoryoraie0 Impart Imcacf b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are ai capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. • Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other protect that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that include such subdivision. The City has determined that the project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Rev. 3/13/07 G & H-67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 33 Less man SrBnlLCam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources: PP g Gptamrauy SrOnlLCam wrm Mrvgatrpn man 9gm6cam Np Impde~ ncolpotatetl m aCt mpdL~ g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. L J 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () (/) () () , quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the prolect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with a variety of land uses, including a retention basin, single-family dwelling units and the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. The site has been previously disrupted during annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; however, in order to ensure that there are no impacts to special-status or sensitive species, a General Habitat Suitability Evaluation Report was prepared by Ecological Sciences. Biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to evaluate on-site habitats and their ability to support sensitive species by walking a series of transects over portions of the site. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered or otherwise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. No special-status plant species were detected during the reconnaissance survey. There were some special status plant species that were not observed during the reconnaissance survey that have aloes-moderate to moderate occurrence potential (Plummer's mariposa lily, Perry's spineflower and Robinson's peppergrass). However, according to the report, none of the plant species that have been assigned a low-moderate to moderate occurrence potential have been assigned any formal state or rarity designation. If the plant species were present, development of the site would not likely result in the elimination of CEQA-significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis, according to the habitat evaluation report. Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 34 Less Than Sgnihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g °pfe"..aly sigmisam w"" Mniganon Tha" signnicam No Impact Incorporated Impact Impart No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on-site, but several species not observed during the survey have a moderate or high occurrence potential, such as loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, Southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit and desert woodrat. However, these species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered, and have been removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Potential impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habit locally, neither of which would be significant, according to the biologist's report. Site development would not likely eliminate significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potential), they are likely uncommon on such small and isolated site (e.g. coastal western whiptail, San Diego horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse and Los Angeles pocket mouse). As such, development impacts would not likely constitute a significant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within Southern California or their overall range. • No direct observations or evidence of Western Burrowing Owls were observed on the project site, but the occurrence potential is considered low-moderate. Although the Burrowing Owl is not protected under Federal or State endangered species acts, it is protected under the Migratory Bird Treat Act of 1918, and the CDFG, which prohibits the • take, possession or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs. Since California ground squirrel burrows were observed on-site and can potentially accommodate owls, the report recommends that an owl survey be completed if site preparation activities occur during the nesting season. According, the mitigation measure listed under Biological Resources shall be adhered to. The report concludes with the following summary: Results of the General Habitat Suitability Evaluation conducted in February of 2008 indicate that habitats present on the +/- 13-acre site [Phase I and Phase II) generally represent lower biological resources values based on the degree in which impacts to on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present because of development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special status-species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact the designated critical habitat. The site would also not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special status species. Further, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87-acre northern parcel) was previously entitled and approved for development by the City on April 14, 2004. Fundamentally, after development of northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining 3.6-acre southern parcel Rev 3/13/07 G & H- 69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 35 • Less Tnan Sipnihcam less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: s9~i~~ahi M. g~eupn Sipnh ant Np Impan Inar ra~etl Impact Impan (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining protect site (3.6-acre southerly parcel) would be ostensibly reduced. With the incorporation of the mitigation measure listed under Biological Resources above, the impact is considered less-than-significant. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is • required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check alt that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update • (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Rev. 3/13/07 G&H-70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 36 (/) Water Quality Management Plan, Lockman and Associates • (June, 2008) (/) General Habitat Suitability Evaluation, Ecological Sciences (April, 2008) (/) URBEMIS 2007 Study, RK Engineering Group, Inc. (May 6, 2008) (/) Response Letter from County of San Bernardino Museum for Archaeological Resources (May 13, 2008) (/) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) • • Rev. 3/13/07 G&fi-71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga ESP Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 Page 37 • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicants Signature: ~~ Date: ~/~/~O Print Name and Title: • Rev. 3/13/07 C'. ~ ~Lr~llGr? ~.~B7i G & H-72 ~ CI19inIa1a1'9n~ ~r®Ilp, Inc. transpnranon plflrning ~ [ratite cngineerwg enri~nnmental engmccrng -parking riudiEs tvlay 06, 2008 Mir. Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Victorville, CA 92392 Subject: 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility Air Quality Impact Study Dear Mr. Mancinelli: RY. ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) has completed an air quality analysis of the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project. The proposed project is located at 73650 Victoria Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as indicated in Exhibit A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has requested that an air quality study be performed to address the affects of potential sources of air quality impacts from the project site to the surrounding area. The current federal and state/local air quality parameters can be found in Table 1. The attached study indicates that construction operation and dust from the project site will have the biggest impact on air quality as a result of the proposed project. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, construction emissions are not expected to exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional and local thresholds. The study also reveals that emissions as a result of operational activities associated with the proposed project are not expected to exceed SCAQMD thresholds. RK is pleased to provide this air quality analysis for the proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Faaliiy project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RK appreciates this opportunity to work with Charles Joseph Associates and looks forward to working with you on future protects. If you have any questions regarding this analysis, or would like further review, please do not hesitate to call us at (949) 474-0809. Sincerely, ~por=5s/pN RY. ENGINEERING G ~~`•~o~~iCTK~%rq``cZ \^~ 1~ 4 rc crp. esr'3oi0s ~ Robert Kahn, P.E. N Q Mike Dickerson Pnncipal 9T, C1Vl~ Q,`'\ Environmental Engineer r of OA`~Fo P,K:ngIRK657 1 3491 macaithur boulevard, raise 310 JP1:2060-?008-01 newpurl beach. caluorria 9?GGn lel 9d4•}:~ OFY04 tax J44 d=a.C902 hltp~iA:~wturkengineer mm G&H-73 • • 3.5 ACRE SELF-STt} GE FACILITY AIR QUALITY IIVIPACT S~ll~'Y Ranchca Cuc~mr~ng~, Calif~rrnia ~,~, • _• ~, I i I ., I ,I I ~' ~" %. 5 4J jam;--.~_.:~ - =--•-° z ~ • :~ :~n_ ~~ f Y.:~ . ~~ ~~ ,µ~~~~ ~ ~~ i~~ M ~ R~-L1y~{~ ~ ~ 6 .~.~~$ i~ .~y~ e°'• ~ ..` t~ 4 F engineering group, inc. G&H-74 CJ 3.5 ACRE SELF-STORAGE FACILITY AIR QUALITY IMPACT STUDY City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Prepared for: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 13109 Sagehen Victorville, CA 92 Prepared by: RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. 3991 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Robert Kahn, P.E. Mike Dickerson ~~pFESS7pN ~O~T- k\qC No. 20285 ~ Exp. 09/30/09 ~ OF May 06, 2008 t RK:nq/RK6577 1N:2060-2008-01 G&H-76 • Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................... .......... 1-1 2.0 Existing Conditions ..................................................................... .......... 2-1 2.1 Regional Climate and Meteorology 2-1 2.2 Ambient Air Quality 2-3 2.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards 2-4 2.2.2 Air Quality Planning 2-F 2.3 Local Air Quality 2-g 3.0 Study Method and Procedure ...................................................... .......... 3-1 3.1 URBEMIS 2007 Model 3-1 3.1.1 Construction Emissions Model 3-1 3.1.2 Operational Emissions Model 3-2 3.2 Local Significance Threshold (LST)' 3-2 4.0 • Future Air Quality Environment and Impacts ............................... 4.1 Standards of Significance ......... 4-1 4-1 4.2 Protect Impact 4-3 4.3 Construction Activity Impact 4-3 4.3.1 Vehicle Emissions 4-6 4 3.2 Local Significance 4-6 4.4 Operational Emissions Impact 4-7 4.4.1 CO Hotspot 4-7 4.4.2 Green House Gas Emissions 4-8 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations ...................................................... ......... 5-1 5.1 Construction Mitigation 5-1 5.1.1 Vehicle Emissions 5- i 5.1.2 Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control 5-1 5.1.3 Off-Site Impacts 5-2 5.2 Operation Mitigation 5-3 6.0 Conclusions ...................................................................................... ......... 6-1 • G & H- 78 List of Attachments Exhibits Location Map ........................................... ..... A Site Plan .................................................................................................................. B les Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards .....:................................... 1 Primary Sources and Effects of Criteria Pollutants ...................................................... 2 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Plan ..................................................................... 3 Riverside County Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary - 2002-2006 ....................... 4 • SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds ............................................................ 5 Calculated PM-10 Emissions from Construction Activity (pounds/day) ....................... 6 Construction Equipment Used for Various Phases .................................................... 7 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction ..................... 8 LST Pollutants Concentraticn Data for Construction (pounds/day) ............................. 9 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) ........................................... 10 dices _• URBEMIS2007 Computer Model Output ................................................................ A G & H- 80 n U G&H-81 • 1.0 Introduction RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) is pleased to provide this Air Quality Impact study for the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site is located 13650 Victoria Avenue in the City of. Rancho Cucamonga, as shown in Exhibit A. The site plan for the project was provided by CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES, Inc. and is shown in Exhibit B. The purpose of this study is to assess potential air quality impacts associated with the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project by investigating the existing meteorological and climate conditions in the project area, identifying the project related sources of potential air quality impact and predicting the future air quality impact levels. As a result of this effort, RK has prepared a list of recommended emission reduction measures, outlined in Section 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations, which should be implemented as part of the • development project to reduce air quality impacts. The study evaluates the air quality impacts associated with both the construction and operation of the proposed project. The 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project site consists of approximately 3.5 acres of land that is currently vacant. The project site has a high school to the west and a residential development to the northwest. The proposed project site completion is expected to be in the Year 2010. The results of the analysis indicate that construction operation and dust from the project site will represent the principle sources of on-site air quality impacting the surrounding area. With implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, construction emissions are not expected to exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regional and local thresholds during the buildout of the project. Localized thresholds are not expected to be exceeded during construction and operation. • G&H-82 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • u 1-2 G & H-83 • 2.0 Existing Conditions 2.1 Regional Climate and Meteorology The climate of the Rancho Cucamonga area, as with all of Southern California; is governed largely by the strength and location of the semi-permanent high pressure center over the Pacific Ocean and the moderating effects of the nearby vast oceanic heat resen~oir. The Local semi-arid climatic condition is characterized by very warm summers, mild winters, and moderate rainfall. This weather pattern is at times interrupted by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, or Santa Ana Winds. Humidity ranges between 70 percent on the Coast and 57 percent in the Eastern Basin. Unfortunately, the same climatic conditions that create this desirable Mediterranean-like climate combine to severely restrict the ability of the local atmosphere to disperse the large volumes of air pollution generated by the • population and industry attracted in part by the climate. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is situated in an area where the pollutants generated in coastal portions of the Los Angeles basin undergo photochemical reactions and then move inland across the project site during the daily sea breeze cycle. Despite dramatic improvement in air quality in the local area throughout the 1980s, the project site is nevertheless, expected to continue to experience some unhealthful air quality for at least the next decade. Temperatures in the project vicinity average 75 degrees Fahrenheit annually with summer afternoons In the mid 90s and winter mornings in the mid 40s. It should also be noted that temperatures much above 100 degrees have been recorded in recent years. On average the warmest months are July and August and the coolest month is December. u 7_-1 G&H-84 In contrast to the slow annual variation of temperature, precpitation is highly • variable seasonally. Rainfall in the Rancho Cucamonga area averages 9 to 21 inches annually and falls from late November to early April with February yielding the greatest amount of precipitation and summers almost completely dry. Because much of the rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms, a shift in the storm track of a few hundred miles can mean the difference between a very wet year and a year with drought conditions. Winds across the project area are an important meteorological parameter because they control both the initial rate of dilution of locally generated air pollutant emissions as well as their regional trajectory. Daytime winds across Rancho Cucamonga show a daytime onshore flow from the NW averaging 6-8 mph. During the daytime, air emissions generated by urbanized coastal areas are transported eastward toward the region without generating any localized air quality impacts. The drainage winds which move slowly across the area have some • potential for localized stagnation. Fortunately, these winds have their origin in the San Gabriel Mountains where background pollution levels are low such that any localized contributions do not create any unhealthful impacts. The wind distribution is such that nominal project-related air quality impacts occur more on a regional scale rather than in the immediate Rancho Cucamonga area. One other important wind condition may occur when a high pressure center forms over the western United States with sinking air forced seaward through local canyons and mountain passes. The air warms by compression and relative humidities drop dramatically. The dry, gusty winds from the N-NE create dust nuisance potential around areas of soil disturbance such as construction sites ar.d sometimes create serious visibility and safety problems for vehicles on area freeways. L J 2-2 G & H- 85 • In conjunction with the two dominant wind regimes that affect the rate and orientation of horizontal pollutant transport, there are two similarly distinct types of temperature inversions that control the vertical depth through which pollutants are mixed. The summer on-shore flow is capped by a massive dome of warm, sinking air which caps a shallow layer of cooler ocean air. These marine/subsidence inversions act like a giant lid over the basin. They allow for local mixing of emissions, but they confine the entire polluted air mass within the basin until it escapes into the desert or along the thermal chimneys formed along heated mountain slopes. In winter, when the air near the ground cools while the air aloft remains warm, radiation inversions are formed that trap low-level emissions such as automobile exhaust near their source. As background levels of primary vehicular exhaust rise during the seaward return flow, the combination of rising non-local baseline levels plus the emissions trapped locally by these radiation inversions creases micro-scale • air pollution "hot spots" near freeways, shopping centers and other traffic concentrations. Because the incoming air draining off the mountains during nocturnal radiation inversion conditions is relatively clean, the summer subsidence inversions are a far more critical factor in determining the Rancho Cucamonga area air quality than the winter time local trapping inversions 2.2 Ambient Air Quality In order to gauge the significance of the air quality impact of the proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project, those impacts, together with existing background air quality levels, must be compared to the applicable ambient air quality standards. These standards are the levels of air quality considered safe, with an adequate margin of safety, to protect the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect those people most susceptible to further respiratory distress such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other • disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise, called 2-3 G & H-86 "sensitive receptors." Nealthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant • concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Recent research has shown, however, that chronic exposure to ozone (the primary ingredient in photochemical smog) may lead to adverse respiratory health even at concentrations close to the ambient standard. 2.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards National Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) were established in 1971 for six pollution species with states retaining the option to add other pollutants, require more stringent compliance, or to include different exposure periods. The initial attainment deadline of 1977 was extended several times in air quality problem areas like Southern California. In 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) adopted a rule which extended and established a new attainment deadline for ozone for the year 2021. Because the State of California had established AAQS • several years before the federal action and because of unique air quality problems introduced by the restrictive dispersion meteorology, there is considerable difference between state and national clean air standards. Those standards currently in effect in California are shown in Table 1. Sources and health effects of various pollutants are shown in Table ~. The Federal Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 required that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) review all national AAQS in light of currently known health effects. EPA was charged with modifying existing standards or promulgating new ones where appropriate. EPA subsequently developed standards for chronic ozone exposure (8+ hours per day) and for very small diameter particulate matter (called "PM-2.5"). National AAQS were adopted on July 17, 1997. Planning and enforcement of the federal standards for PM-2.5 and for ozone (8-hour) were challenged by trucking and manufacturing organizations. In a unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that EPA did not require specific • 2-4 G & H- 87 • congressional authorization to adopt national clean air standards. The Court also ruled that health-based standards did not require preparation of acost-benefit analysis. The Court did find, however, that there was some inconsistency between existing and "new" standards in their respective attainment schedules. Such attainment-planning schedule inconsistencies centered mainly on the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA subsequently agreed to downgrade the attainment designation for a large number of communities to "non-attainment" for the 8-hour ozone standard. Because the South Coast Air Basin is still. far from attaining the 1-hour federal standard, the 8-hour ozone non-attainment designation will not substantially alter the attainment planning process. The compliance deadline for the 8-hour ozone standard has been extended to 2021. Evaluation of the most recent data on the health effects of inhalation of fine particulate matter prompted the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to recommend adoption of the statewide PM-2.5 standard that is more stringent than • the federal standard This standard was adopted on June 20, 2002. The State PM-2.5 standard is more of a goal in that it does not have specific attainment planning requirements like a federal clean air standard, but only requires continued progress towards attainment, Similarly, the ARB extensively evaluated health effects of ozone exposure. Anew state standard for an .8-hour ozone exposure was adopted in April 2005, which mirrors the federal standard. The California 8-hour ozone standard of 0.07 ppm is more stringent than the federal 8-hour standard of 0.08 ppm. The state standard, however, does not have a specific attainment deadline.. California air quality jurisdictions are required to make steady progress toward attaining state standards, but there are no hard deadlines or any consequences of non-attainment. As part of the same re-evaluation process, the ARB is anticipated to adopt a new annual state standard for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) that is more stringent than the corresponding federal standard. • 2-5 G& H-88 Of the standards shown in Table 1, those for ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), • and"particulate matter (PM-10) are exceeded at times in the South Coast Air Basin. They are called "non-attainment pollutants." The CO standard is currently met in the basin, and re-designation to "attainmenVmaintenance" was adopted in October 2007. Because of the variations in both the regional meteorology and in area-wide differences in levels of air pollution emissions, patterns of non-attainment have strong spatial and temporal differences. 2.2.2 Air Quality Planning The Federal Clean Air Act (1977 Amendments) required that designated agencies in any area of the nation not meeting national clean air standards must prepare a plan demonstrating the steps that vvould bring the area into compliance with all national standards. The South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) could not meet the deadline for ozone, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, or PM-10. In the SCAB, the agencies designated by the governor to develop regional air quality plans are the SCAQMD • and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The two agencies first adopted an Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) in 1979 and revised it several times asearlier attainment forecasts were shown to be overly optimistic. The 1990 federal Clean Air Aci Amendment (CAAA) required that all states with air- sheds with "serious" or worse ozone problems submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Several amendments to the SIP have been proposed, revised and approved over the past decade. The most current regional attainment emissions forecast for ozone precursors (ROG and NOx) and for carbon monoxide (CO) is shown in Table 3. The Air Quality Management District (AQMD) adopted an updated clean air "blueprint" in August 2003. The 2003 AQMP was approved by the EPA in 2004. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) outlines the air pollution measures • 2-6 G & H- 89 • needed to meet federal health-based standards for ozone by 2010 and for particulates (PM-10) by 2006. Components of the 2003 air plan include: • How the federal standard for CO will be maintained: • Control measures to further reduce emissions from business, industry and paints. • Measures to be adopted by CARE and EPA to further reduce pollution from: - Cars - Trucks - Construction equipment - Aircraft - Ships - Consumer products With re-designation of the air basin as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone • standard, a new attainment plan was adopted in June 2007. This plan shifts most of the one-hour ozone standard attainment strategies to the 8-hour standard. As previously noted, the attainment date will "slip" from 2010 to 2021. A commercial project relates to the Air Quality Management Plans (AQMP} primarily through the land use and growth assumptions used to forecast automotive air pollution emissions. The basin-wide AQMP is based on the designated land use for the project site contained in the local and County General Plans. The proposed 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project represents a small increment of commercial growth. The project thus represents an increment of already planned growth. Implementation of such planned growth will not delay the timely attainment of regional clean air standards. With re-designation of the air basin as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard, preparation of a new attainment plan was required. This plan shifts most • of the one-hour ozone standard attainment strategies to the 8-hour standard. The 2-7 G&H-90 2067 AQMP was adopted on June i, 2007, after extensive public review. The 2007 • AQMP recognizes the interaction between photochemical processes that create both ozone and the smallest airborne particulates (PM-2.5). The 2007 AQMP is therefore a coordinated plan for both pollutants. Key emissions reductions strategies in the updated air quality plan include. • Ultra-low emissions standards for both new and existing sources (including on- and-off-road heavy trucks, industrial and service equipment, locomotives, ships and aircraft}. Accelerated fleet turnover to achieve benefits of cleaner engines. • Reformulation of consumer products. Modernization and technology advancements from stationary sources (refneries, power plants, etc.). 2.3 Local Air Quality • The proposed project is located within an area monitored by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Existing and probable future levels of air quality around the project area can be best inferred from ambient air quality measurements conducted by SCAQMD at their various continuous monitoring stations. The nearest air quality monitoring station in relation to the project site for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, and Nitrogen Dioxide is at the Northwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station (station number 5175). The nearest air quality monitoring station for PM-10 and ultra-fine particulates (PM-2.5) is at the Southwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station (station number 5817). Data from the Southwest San Bernardino Valley monitoring station was used only where data was not available from the closest monitoring station (Northwest San Bernardino Valley). These stations measure both regional pollution levels such as smog, as well as primary vehicular pollution levels near busy roadways such as carbon monoxide or • nitrogen oxides. Table 4 is a 5-year summary of monitoring data for the major air 2-8 G&H-91 • pollutants compiled from these two air monitoring stations. From this data the following conclusions can be drawn: Photochemical smog (ozone) levels frequently exceed standards. The 1-hour state was violated an average of 49 days a year in the last five years near Rancho Cucamonga. The federal 8-hour standard has been exceeded an average of Z2 days a year within the last flue years. While ozone levels are still high, they are much lower than 10 to ZO years ago. Attainment of all clean air standards in the protect vicinity is not likely to occur soon, but the severity and frequency of violations is expected to continue to slowly decline during the current decade. 2. PM-10 levels have exceeded the state Z4-hour standard on approximately 31.7 percent of all measurement days. The three times less stringent federal 24 hour-standard was not exceeded in the past five years. Year to year • fluctuations of overall maximum Z4-hour PM-10 levels seem to follow no discernable trend. 3. PM-2.5 Ultra-Fine Particulates 65 ,ug/m3 readings have exceeded the federal 24-hour PM 25 ambient standard an average of 1.0 percent of the days data was collected in the last five years. PM-Z.5 > 35 !rg/m3 have exceeded the federal Z4-hour PM-Z.5 ambient standard an average of 5.5 percent of the days data was collected over the past year, as data is only available for the most recent year. 4. With the adoption of the revised lower Nitrogen Dioxide Annual Average Concentration > 0.030 ppm level, the ARB's annual standard in 2006 was exceeded by 0.001 or 3.3%. 2-9 G & H-92 5. More localized pollutants such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, etc. are • very low near the project site because background levels in San Bernardino County never exceed allowable levels. There is substantial excess dispersive capacity to accommodate localized vehicular air pollutants such as NOx or CO without any threat of violating applicable AAQS. • LJ 2-10 G&H-93 • 3.0 Study Method and Procedure The air quality study analyzes potential pollutants and contaminant impacts from the project site to a sensitive receiver or receptor. The analysis methodology utilized procedures outlined in the SCAQMD 1993 "CEQA Air Quality Handbook" where appropriate. In areas where more site-specific information was available beyond the default values recommended in the handbook, they were used to supplement the AQMD- suggested input parameters. Vehicular emissions were calculated using the California Air Resources Board (ARB) URBEMIS2007 computer model. 3.1 URBEMIS 2007 Model • Utilizing the URBEMIS 2007 software an air quality assessment was calculated for construction and operational emissions for the project phases. The air quality study is consistent to the expected general time line for the project completion. 3.1.1 Construction Emissions Model Average daily PM-10 emissions during site grading and other disturbance are stated in the SCAQMD for projects in southern California CEQA Handbook to be 26.4 pounds per acre. Enhanced dust control procedures such as continual soil wetting, use of supplemental binders, early paving, etc. can achieve an even higher PM-10 control efficiency. Daily emissions with use of reasonably available control measures (RACMS) for PM-10 can reduce emission levels to around 10 pounds per acre per day. The default value used is 20 Ibs per day. With the use of best available control measures (BACMs) the California Air Resources Board URBEMIS2007 computer model predicts that emissions can be reduced to Z-3 pounds per acre per day, as shown on the URBEMIS analysis printouts provided in • the Appendix. 3-1 G&H-94 3.1.2 Operational Emissions Model • The project site is expected to be completed by the end of Year 2010. The project site consists of approximately 3.5 acres and will consist of aself-storage facility. A daily trip rate of 38.87 trips per acre was applied to the 3.5 Storage Facility. Accordingly, the proposed project is expected to generate 136 average daily trips (ADT) during a typical weekday. For typical San Bernardino County commercial trip lengths, approximately 9.0 miles, additional vehicle travel from project implementation will be about 1,221 vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Secondary impact potential of the project is from energy consumption in power plants or on-site heaters, stoves, water, heaters, etc. General development also creates miscellaneous emissions from a variety of sources such as cleaning products or landscaping equipments, and also contributes to off-site emissions at restaurants, gas stations, dry cleaners, or sand and gravel plants. Except for more readily quantifiable energy consumption (stationary sources), many of the small • miscellaneous sources are typically not quantified on a single project basis. These small sources, however, are non-negligible when minute individual contributions are summed over millions of Southern California residences. They further attest to the conclusion that overall anticipated growth is a substantial impediment to the attainment of regional clean air standards. 3.2 Local Significance Threshold (LST) The SCAQMD has developed analysis parameters to evaluate ambient air quality on a local level in addition to the more regional emissions-based thresholds of significance. These analysis elements are called Local Significance Thresholds (LSTs). LSTs were developed in response to Governing Board's Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative 1-4 and the LST methodology was provisionally adopted in October 2003 and formally approved by SCAQMD's Mobile Source Committee in February 2005. . 3-2 G&H-95 • LSTs are only applicable to the following criteria pollutants: oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM-10 and PM-2.5). For general development projects, LSTs are generally only applicable to the construction phase. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard, and are developed based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant for each source receptor area and distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. • _• 3-3 G& H-96 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • 3-4 G & H- 97 • 4.0 Future Air Quality Environment and Impacts This purpose of this study is to determine if the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project will have any air quality impacts. The potential impacts are discussed in the following section. The site consists of approximately 3.5 acres of land that is currently vacant. 4.1 Standards of Significance Many air quality impacts from dispersed mobile sources, i.e., the dominant pollution generators in the basin, often occur hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of any individual source is generally immeasurably small. The SCAQMD has therefore developed suggested significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on • actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The 1993 SCAQMD Handbook (as subsequently revised) states that any projects in the SCAB (South Coast Air Basin) with daily emissions that may exceed any of the thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. Table 5 shows the current SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Additional indicators should be used as screening criteria to evaluate the need for further analysis with respect to air quality. Whenever possible, the project should be evaluated in a quantitative analysis; otherwise a qualitative analysis Is appropriate. The additional significance thresholds include whether the: • Project may interfere with the attainment of the federal or state ambient air quality standards by either violating or contributing to an existing or projected • air quality violation. 4-1 G&H-98 • Project may result in population increases within the regional statistical area • which would be in excess of that projected in the AQMP. • Project may generate vehicle trips that became a CO hot spot. • Project might have the potential to create or be subjected to objectionahle odors. • Project may have hazardous materials on-site and could result in an accidental release of air toxic emissions. • Project may involve disposal of hazardous waste • Project may involve being occupied by sensitive receptors near a facility that emits air toxics or near CO hot spots. • Project may emit carcinogenic air contaminants that may pose a cancer risk. The project site is located directly adjacent to the SR-15 Freeway. CO emissions from the adjacent freeway will supersede any emissions from the project site. A CAtINE 4 • model which is utilized to identify the impact of CO "hot spots" is not needed because the of the location of the project site relative to the adjacent freeway and meets the SCAQMD CEQA criteria. Temporary emissions during construction and regional mobile source emissions from trips generated by mini warehouse buildings are the only credible sources of potential air quality impact. The vehicle trips produced by the project site are insignificant when compared to the adjacent SR-15 Freeway. 4.2 Project Impact Intensification of land uses in San Bernardino County potentially impacts ambient air quality on two scales of motion. Regionally, as vehicles drive throughout Southern California, the small incremental contribution to the basin air pollution burden from any single vehicle is added to that from several million other vehicles. The impact from this project, even if it generates a significant number of new vehicle trips, is • 4-2 G & H- 99 • very small on a regional scale. Basin-wide air quality impacts are, therefore, addressed in terms of project compatibility with regional air quality plans. If any given project or plan has been properly incorporated into basin-wide growth projections which are the basis for regional air quality/transportation planning, then the basin-wide impact of any proposed development is presumed, by definition, to be less-than-significant. Locally, changes in the location of any collection of automotive sources, or changes in the number of vehicles or travel speeds may impact the micro-scale air quality around any given development site. Traffic increases not only contribute air pollutants in direct proportion to their cumulative percentage of traffic volume growth, but they may slow all existing traffic to slower, more inefficient travel speeds. However, cars are becoming "clean" which is lowering emission levels and lowering the amount of local air pollution "hot spots." • 4.3 Construction Activity Impact Temporary construction activity emissions will occur during project build-out. Such emissions include on-site generation of dust and equipment exhaust, and off-site emissions from construction employee commuting and/or trucks delivering building materials. Because of their temporary nature, air quality impacts from construction have often been considered as individually less-than-significant. Also, construction activity emissions are difficult to quantify, since the exact type and amount of equipment that will be used or the acreage that may be disturbed on any given day in the future is not known with any reasonable certainty. The emphasis in environmental documents relative to construction activity emission impacts has therefore been to minimize the emissions as fully as possible through comprehensive mitigation even if the exact amount of emissions cannot be precisely quantified. -• 4-3 G & H-100 Short-term construction impacts may be generated by soil disturbance and • equipment exhaust. Dust is normally the primary concern during construction of new buildings and infrastructure. Because such emissions are not amenable to collection and discharge through a controlled source, they are called "fugitive emissions." Emission rates vary as a function of many parameters (soil silt, soil moisture, wind speed, area disturbed, number of vehicles, depth of disturbance or excavation, etc.). Regulatory agencies typically use one universal factor based on the area disturbed assuming that all other input parameters into emission rate prediction fall into mid-range average values. This assumption may or may not necessarily be applicable to site-specific conditions on the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project site. Emissions estimates for project-specific fugitive dust sources are therefore characterized by a considerable degree of imprecision. The entire project site occupies approximately 3.5 acres. The entire site will not be under simultaneous disturbance. The California Air Resources Board (GARB) emissions computer model URBEMIS2007 shows that average daily grading • disturbance "footprint" for the proposed use will be approximately 0.88 acres. Calculated PM-10 emissions with the application of "standard" dust control, and with the application of enhanced dust control measures are shown in Table 6. PM-10 emissions will be below the PM-10 significance thresholds with the use of "standard" dust control measures. However, because the basin is non-attainment for PM-10, use of best available control measures (BACtvts} for dust is nevertheless required. Current research in particulate exposure health effects suggests that the most adverse effect derives from ultra-small diameter particulate matter comprised of chemically reactive pollutants such as sulfates, nitrates or organic material. A national clean air standard for particulate matter of 2 5 microns or smaller in diameter (called "PM-2.5") was adopted in 1997. Very little construction activity • 4-4 G & H-101 • particulate matter is in the PM-2.5 range. Soil dust is also more chemically benign than typical urban atmospheric PM-2.5. In addition to fine particles that remain suspended in the atmosphere semi- indefinitely, construction activities generate many larger particles with shorter atmospheric residence times. This dust is comprised mainly of large diameter inert silicates that are chemically non-reactive and are further readily filtered out by human breathing passages. These fugitive dust particles are therefore more a potential soiling nuisance as they settle out on parked cars, outdoor furniture, or landscape foliage than they are an adverse health hazard. Any dust nuisance potential will be minimized, however, by a combination of mandatory control programs and the relatively short dust deposition distance (<100 feet) for large- dust particles. During Santa Ana wind conditions, large particles can be carried much farther, typically from NW to SW. During these conditions, sensitive receivers (high school) are located in the approximate downwind direction; however, the • creation of visible dust plumes from disturbed soil is prohibited by SCAQMD Rule 403. Provisions for enhanced dust control must be made for occasional Santa Ana wind conditions. Construction activity air quality impacts occur mainly in close proximity to individual disturbance areas. However, there may be some "spill-over" into the surrounding community. That spill-over may be physical as vehicles drop or carry out dirt or silt is washed into public streets. Passing non-project vehicles then pulverize the dirt to create off-site dust impacts. Spill-over may also occur through congestion effects. Construction may entail roadway encroachment, detours, land closures and competition between construction vehicles (trucks and contractor employee commuting) and ambient traffic for available roadway capacity. Emissions controls require good housekeeping procedures and a construction traffic management plan that maintains such "spill-over" effects at aless-than-significant level. • 4-5 G & H-102 4.3.1 Vehicle Emissions Exhaust emissions will result from on-and off-site heavy equipment during grading. Emissions will also be generated during finish construction, especially during the application of paints or other coatings. The types and numbers of equipment will vary among contractors such that such emissions cannot be quantified with certainty. The assumed equipment for various phases of construction is shown in Table 7. The ARB's URBEMI52007 computer model was used to estimate maximum daily emissions during various phases of construction, including construction worker commuting emissions. The results (pound/day) and are shown in Table 8. Construction equipment will emit diesel particulate matter (DPM) that is a known carcinogen. The cancer risk associated with such exposure is based on a 70-year, 365 day/year, 24 hour/day outdoor exposure. Grading will occur for approximately • 1 month. It is important to note that grading will only occur during weekday working hours over the course of several years, rather than non-stop for 70 years. The closest populations exposed to potential construction activity DPM residential uses northwest of the site. Residences are often unoccupied during the construction work-day, and exterior residential uses are limited in duration compared to the Z4/hour per day assumption. Any public health risk from construction equipment DPM exposure is insignificant based upon exposure duration and intensity. 4.3.2 Local Significance The average daily grading disturbance "footprint" for will be 0.88 acres. LST pollutant concentration data for construction on a 1 acre disturbed site is referenced from the SQAMD 2005 Thresholds for Construction. The data represents the appropriate Source Receptor Area (Northwest San Bernardino Valley) for 1-acre, • 4-6 G & H-103 • 2-acre, and 5-acre sites for asource-receptor distance of 50 meters to any sensitive receptors near the site. Table 9 indicates that all mitigated emissions are below LST thresholds during project construction. 4.4 Operational Emissions Impact The California ARB land use and air pollution emissions URBEMIS2007 computer model was run for a year 2010 project build-out. The project-related vehicular emissions burden is shown in Table 10. An increase in emissions will occur based on the land use type, however, the project operation thresholds will not be exceeded for any of the pollutants analyzed. In addition to regional air quality concerns which focus on the photochemical conversion of air pollution emissions to more harmful forms, vehicular exhaust may impact air quality immediately adjacent to the roadway travel lanes. Such micro- . scale carbon monoxide (CO) impacts occur during periods of maximum traffic congestion and minimum atmospheric dispersion. 4.4.1 CO Hotspot Micro-scale alr quality is traditionally analyzed within environmental studies in terms of any potential CO. "hot spots." Hot spots are possible violations of standards at sensitive receptor locations within very short distances of major intersections or other points of traffic stagnation. Such an analysis is not necessary for the proposed project because: 1. Background CO levels are low in San Bernardino County. 2. The average CO emissions per vehicle will decrease by more than 50 percent in this next decade such that it becomes physically impossible to create enough of a vehicle concentration to generate enough CO emissions to exceed standards. 4-7 G & H-104 3. The background CO levels are, currently 1.8 ppm. .lt would take an increase • of +18.Z ppm to exceed the current 1-hour standard of 20 ppm. CO modeling by the SCAQMD has shown that the worst-case CO impact at the largest intersection in the air basin operating at a level of service "F" is much less than 18 ppm. Any local CO impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga would be much less than the worst-case basin-wide location. 4. CO emissions from the adjacent freeway will supersede any emissions from the project site. 4.4.2 Green House Gas Emissions Construction equipment will generate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions possibly associated with currently observed global warming. California has adopted several initiatives to reduce GHG emissions from combustion sources. Obviously, no single project or jurisdiction generates enough GHG to impact global climate. However, • the cumulative impact of all combustion of fossil fuels may have global implications. Use of modern diesel engines, required to mitigate NOx impacts, will have a small GHG emissions reduction benefit from increased combustion efficiency. In the absence of any GHG thresholds of emissions significance or methodology to analyze such impacts, the use of maximally efficient diesel-fueled equipment is believed to mitigate any cumulative GHG impacts as much as is practical. u 48 G & H-105 • 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations 5.1 Construction Mitigation Recommended emissions reduction measures for construction activities are outlined in the sections below. If implemented as part of the proposed project, these measures will yield a reduction in air quality impacts associated with the development. 5.1.1 Vehicle Emissions As described in Section 4.3, construction of the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project will have a less than significant impact from equipment emissions on air quality from heavy construction equipment and vehicles. The following measures are • recommended to reduce impact during project construction. • Construction equipment shall be maintained in proper tune. • ~ Utilize gasoline or electricity-powered equipment instead of diesel equipment whenever possible. • Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. • All construction vehicles shall be prohibited from excessive idling. Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at a reasonable cost. 5.1.Z Fugitive Dust Emissions and Control To reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction, the use of best available control measures (BACM) shall be implemented during grading. The menu of enhanced dust control measures includes the following: 5-1 G & H-106 • Water all active construction areas three times daily. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. • Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. • Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for more than 96 hours after clearing is completed. 5.1.3 Off-Site Impacts Based on the description of the proposed project, the following are recommendations to help reduce the potential air quality impact to the surrounding community. These recommendations can help further mitigate the potential impact to daily construction activities. • Encourage car pooling for construction workers. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. • • Wash or sweep access points daily. • Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. • Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. • The project should participate in any City adopted Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs. • 5-2 G & H-107 • 5.2 Operation Mitigation Operational emissions and maintenance activities will not exceed adopted significance thresholds. • Estimated peak day emissions of CO, ROG, NOx, and SOx do not exceed the SCAQMD operation thresholds. The impact would therefore be less significant. • Estimated peak day emissions of PM-10 do not exceed the SCAQMD operation threshold. The impact would therefore be less significant. • Estimated peak day emissions of PM-2.5 do not exceed the SCAQMD operation threshold. The impact would therefore be less significant. • 5-3 G & H-108 ~~ THIS PAGE INTEN7IUNALLY LE F7 BLANK • 5-4 G & H-109 • 6.0 Conclusions This air quality analysis assesses the potential air quality impacts and necessary mitigation measures for the 3.5 Acre Self-Storage Facility project. The project site is located at 13650 Victoria Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown in Exhibit A. The site plan used for this analysis was provided by CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES, Inc., and is presented in Exhibit B. The results of the analysis indicate that construction operation and dust from the project site will represent the principle sources of on-site air quality impacting the surrounding area. The following conclusions for the project are listed below: • The project-related short construction emissions along with the SCAQMD thresholds are shown in Table 8. Short-term construction impacts are below the SCAQMD thresholds and are considered less than significant. U • The local significance emissions for construction along with the localized signifcance thresholds (LST) are indicated in Table 9. All LST's pollutants are below the thresholds after the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. • The project-related long-term emissions along with the SCAQMD thresholds are indicated in Table 10 All emission levels are below the SCAQMD thresholds and are considered not significant. A detailed list of necessary air quality mitigation measures is presented in Section 5.0 Mitigation Recommendations. The air quality mitigation analysis and recommendations are intended to satisfy the South Coast Alr Basin (SCAB) standards with respell to this project. • 6-1 G & H-110 C~ THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • • 6-2 G & H-111 ~~ Exhibits G & H-112 G & H-113 Exhibit A ;• Location irtap 206408-01(ExA) 3.5 ACNE SELF-STOPAGE FAQLITY AIR QUALITY IMPACT STUDY, Rancho Cucamcnga, Cali(omu engineering group, inc. G & H-114 Exhibit B Site Plan _, 2osaoaoi~~ - engineering 35 ACME SELF-STORAGE FACILffY AIRQUALi7Y IMPACT STUDY, Rzncho Cucamonga, California group, InC. G & H-115 ~~ Tables G & H-116 G & H-117 J TABLE 1 Current Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards Pollutant Average National Standards ~ California Major Pollutant Sources Time Standards Ozone (03) 1-hr No Federal Standard 0.09 ppm 8-hr 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm Motor Vehicles, paints, coatings, and solvents. Carbon Monoxide 1-hr 35.0 ppm Z0.0 ppm Internal combustion engines, (CO) 8-hr 9.0 ppm 9 0 ppm primarily gasoline powered _ _ motor vehicles Nitrogen Dioxide (NOZ) Annual Avg _ 0 OS ppm 0.03 ppm Motor vehicles, petroleum- refining operations, industrial 1-hr No Federal Standard 18 m sources, aircraft, ships, and Sulfur Dioxide (SOz) _ Annual Avg 0.03 ppm - - Fuel combustion, chemical 1-hr No Federal Standard O.ZS ppm plants, sulfur recovery plants, 24-hr 0.14 ppm 0.04 ppm and metal processing. Lead (Pb) Monthly - - 1.5 erg/m3 Present source. Lead smelters, battery manufacturing and recycling facilities Quarterly 1,5ug/rn3 -- Past source: Combustion of __ leaded asoline Particulate Matter _ knnual Avg No Federal Standard 2ppg/m3 _ _ Dust and fume-producing (PMr~ construction, industrial and agricultural operations, 24-hr 150 Ng/m3 SO Ng/m3 combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (i.e., wind _ _ raised dust and ocean sprays). Particulate Matter Annual Avg 15 Ng/m3 12 Ng/m3 Dust and fume-producing (PMZ s) construction, industrial and agricultural operations, 24-hr 35 Ng/m3 _ _ combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (i.e., wind raised dust and oceans ra s . pprn =parts per million pglm' =micrograms per cubic meter Source. South Coast lur Quality Management Dis;nQ . l: rktables1RK6571 TB IN:2060-2008-01 G & H-118 TABLE 2 Primary Sources and Effects of Criteria Pollutants ry (Sulfur dioxide (SOZ) Combustion of suliur- containing fossil fuels Smelting of sulfur-bearing metal ores Industrial Process npaument of blood h nil nerve construction ehavioral and hearing robleins in children ravation of respirtory aces (asthma, emphysema) uced lung function stion of eyes uced visibility t injury rbon Monoxide (CD) Dioxide (NOZ) zone (03) Fine Particulate Patter (PM 10) omplete combustion of rls and other carbon- ttaining substances, such motor vehicle exhaust tural events, such as :omposition of orgainc Motor vehicle exhaust High- temperature stationary combustion Atmospheric reactions Atmospheric reaction of organic gases with nitrogen oxides in sunlight Stationary combustion of solid fuels Construction Industrial Process Atmospheric chemical reactions Deterioration of metals, textiles, leather, finishes, coating, etc. Reduced tolerance for exercise Impairment of metal function Impairment of fetal development Death at high levels of exposure Aggravation of some heart diseases (angina) Aagravation of respiratory ilness Reduces visibility Reduced plant growth Formation of acid rain Aggravation of respiratory and cardiovascular diseases Irritation of eyes Impairment of cardiopulmonary function Plant leaf injury Reduced lung function Aggravation of the effects of gaseous pollutants Aggravation of respiratory and cardiorespiratoryiliseases Increased cough and chest discomfort Soiling Reduced visibility j: rktabfes/RK6517TB IN:2060-2008-01 • I G & H-119 ,~ TABLE 3 South Caast Air Basin Attainment Plan (Emissions in tons/day) • ROG NOx CO . Currentlnventoryt Stationary On-Road Mobile Off-Road Mobile 304 276 131 103 581 286 246 2,705 1,003 TOTAL 710 970 3,953 2010 Forecastz Stationary On-Road Mobile Off-Road Mobile 296 212 122 89 434 257 217 2,048 1,094 TOTAL 630 780 3,359 2020 ForecastZ Stationary On-Road Mobile Off-Road Mobile 340 130 114 90 206 241 234 1,097 1,104 TOTAL 584 537 2,435 ~ 2005 Base Year. s With cu«ent emissions reduction programs and adopted growth forecasts Source California Air Resources Board, the 2005 California Almanac of Emission & Air Quality l: rktableslRK6517T8 1N:2060-2008-07 G & H-120 TABLE 4 Riverside County Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary - 2002-2006 (Days Standards Were Exceeded and Maximum Observed Levels) PollutanVStandard 2002 2003 2D04 2005 2006 Ozone 1-Hour > 0.09 ppm (S) 36 48 31 34 50 1-Hour > 0.12 ppm (~ 5 15 2 8 14 B-I-lour > 0.07 ppm (S) -- -- 31 34 54 8-Flour > 0.08 ppm (F) 19 35 18 15 25 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0.139 0.155 0.138 0.149 0.17 Carbon Monoxide 1-Hour > 20. ppm (S) 0 0 0 0 0 8-Hour > 9. ppm (S, F) 0 0 0 0 0 Max 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 4 4 3 3 3 Max 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 1.6 2 9 2.1 1.8 1.8 Nitrogen Dioxide 1-liour > 0.18 ppm (S) 0 0 D 0 0 Max 1-FlourCOnc. (ppm) 0 12 0 11 0.11 0.10 0 10 Annual Ave AAM Conc > 0.030 (ppm) -- -- -~ -- 0.0310 PM-10 Z4-Hour>SOUg/m3(S) 25/61 18/62 17/58 19/60 17/62 24-Hour> 150 Ng/m'(F) 0/67 0/62 0/58 0/60 0/62 Max 24-Hour Conc. Qag/m3) 91 149 93 74 78 Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM-Z.5) 24-Flour > 65 ug/m° (F) -- 0/11 - 3/118 2/112 1/110 0/107 24-Hour>35ltg/ma (f) -- -- -- -- 7/107 Max. 24-Hour Conc. (uglm3) 64.8 88.9 86.1 87 8 53.7 Source: Northwest San Bernardino Valley (5175): Ozone, Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Dioxide Southwest San Bernardino Valley (5817). PM-10, Ultra fine Particulates (PM-LS) j: rkYables/RK651178 /ld.206D-2008-01 • G & H-121 TABLE 5 SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds Mass Dail Thresholds' Pollutant ConstructionZ Operationa Nox 1001bs/day SSlbs/day VOC 75 Ibslday __ SS lbs/day - _ PM 7 0 _ 150 Ibs/day _ 150 Ibs/dad-__ - PM2.5 - 55 Ibs/day SS Ibs/day Sox - -- CO _ -- -- 150 Ibs/da - ------ ---Y - ----- SSOIbs/day-_- _- ___ -- - -- 150 Ibs/da ----~-- - --- _ SSOIbs/day _ Lead 3 Ibs/day _ 3 Ibs/day • ~ Source . SCAQMD CEQA Handbook (SCAQMD, 1993) a Construction thresholds apply to both the South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley (Salton Sea and Mojave Desert Air Basins). ~. 3 For Coachella Valley, the mass daily thresholds for operation are the same as the construction thresholds j.UktablesVtK657 7 TR 1N.2060-2008-07 G & 'H-122 TABLE 6 • Calculated PM-10 Emissions From Construction Activity (pounds/day) Average Daily With Reasonably Grading With Minimum Dust available Control With Best Available Control Control Measures Disturbance Area Measures 1 Acres 19.0 10 0 3.3 -- • j;LkfableslRK65117Q 1N:2060-2008-01 G & H-123 TABLE 7 Construction Equipment Used for Various Phases Grading Assembly Finish Grader (1) Forklift (2) Paver (1) Backhoe(1) eackhoe(1) Backhoe(1) Dozer{7) Crane (1) Roller (7) Water Truck (1) -- Cement Mix (4) • • j. rktables/RK65 ] 7T8 /N:2060-2008-01 G & H-124 TABLE 8 Estimated Unmitigated Maximum Daily Emission During Construction Activity ROG NO„ CO SOz PM-10 Total PM-10 Equip. Exh. PM-10 Dust pM-2,5 Grading 3.6 28.1 14.8 0.0 19.0 1.4 17.6 5.0 (2008) Assembly & 23.0 31.4 27.2 0 0 2.2 2.11 0.1 2.0 Finish (2009) SCAQMD 75. 100. 550. 150. 150. -- ~ -- 55. Threshold * includes 200 truck miles of building material delivery per day j: rY. iableslRK6511 TB lN:7060-7008-07 • • G & H-125 • TABLE 9 LST Pollutants Concentration Data for Construction (pounds/day) Central5an Bernardino Valley2 CO N0, PM-10 PM-2.5 LST Threshold 1,188 258 i4 6 Proposed Project 15.27 28-31 2.33 23 • 'Disturbance area of 1 acre ~ Referenced station -Northwest San Bernardino Valley (32) at 50 meteor from project site '• 3 With mrtigatlon j.lrktableslRK657 iT6 lN.2060-2008-01 G & H-126 TABLE 10 Project-Operations Air Pollution Emissions (pounds/day) Source ROG NOx CO SOx PM-10 PM-Z.6 Operational (Vehicle) 1 0 1.5 13.3 00 2.1 U.4 Emission Estimates Area Source Emission 1 6 1.6 14.9 0.0 2.1 0.4 Estimates* Total: Operational + Area 2.6 3.1 28.2 0.0 4.2 0.6 SCAQMD Significance ~~ ~~ 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeds Threshold (?) No No No No No No %o(Thre;hold 4.8% 5.6% 6.1% 0.0% 2.6% 1.5% * Energy consumption, landscape maintenance, etc Source: URBEMIS2007 Air Quality Model; Output in Appendir.. j: rktables/RY.6517Tl3 IN2060-2008-Oi • G & H-127 Appendices G & H-128 G & H-129 _~ Appendix A URBEMISZ007 Computer Model Output G & H-130 G & H-131 • u d m M V r W O N o ~ N m d ~n 0 N n O 0 d a T t6 N O C 3 O a_ N L"~ O N C O N E w `m v N C E 0 U 0 Q N f0 O U s O O U J U N O a O O N O z M N r 0 0 N U ri E w 0 N C O Ol N t6 m N C O N N W N U N t0 D C O G & H-132 N o o a a I M W M M U ~ ~ m M ~ m N N N N V Q Vl N W OI O I~ n m n m g v a ury N o ~ o M m m n N a m ° ~ ~ ~ a o o N N ^ M O O O N N ~ a N O O O O M N N m (7 !V N ul O h d O N V O ~ O a e e N N O O O '- O I N Q a m o 0 m w 0 0 o O o N O o o m o ' ~ o ° 0 o O~ O o , 0 o 0 o O O~ n n o 0 UI n n N N r ~ N N O Q V1 O Z O O M M Z ~ry N N M M i~l 1n ~/ ~I O ~ O U m r~i m m I f7 M N N N N U M W w ~ w N (j W N .~ ~ V/ W m m m ~ W v W a Z m m m m m m O c ~ ~ rn O ~ N ~ E ~ E M m _. ~ O m - Q ~ m m m m N E = E ° ~ w z v lu a ti v 7, a ; ~ w ~ w Z ~ _ a ~d O a a n a w m ~ m r a N ~ N N N N U ? a N ¢ Z a N O N ° m ~ O O ~ O ~ y O O ~ N N E N F F- F- F- Q 2 l6 ~ ~ O o 0 0 0 ~ O~ a ~O 0- N N U N N N N 4 F' ~ r G & H-133 O °o U N N ~ N O g a O ~- a N O ~ ~N a 0 U rn I ~ _I N LI ~ h N a a 0 N a a w ^2 "I o) a O OI U Q ~ ~ X ~ ~ ^ O a i a ° a E ~ Z < 6 ~ U u a - m m m O m a u d L ~ c c m ~ o m c C ~ ~ F n c C a N U O J ~ U O o C F U C • • • m O M O m W Q! N r N m m N r m O N N N m .- r N N M r r W O a> o r o a v e ri v m a m v ~c m o m n r e N m rv rn a m N m N N M m N O O m m r O O m m r N N H1 M '- t7 f~) ~- • m m O O O m t(1 m m m if] m m N1 m O O O 01 Ip m O O OI m In ' M O T OI to M O O O O e v m .- a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.~ O O O O O N N m N N N N m N N O O O ~^'qI M O m O O OI p~ h C'I O OJ 01 N m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OJT m m O O O M m O N ~- m m O N O O O ~W1JI m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ri ri o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o o m m M m m m m M m m o 0 0 o m a o 0 0 o m M o 0 o m m o 0 o a ai i^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m N o o m in N o o a e v o e o 0 0 o m m o 0 0 m m o 0 0 0 o .- o o .= .- 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m o in e m m o m e o 0 0 .o co m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ r' 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • O O O O O O N N O 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a° o o °o 00 °o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r o m o a a v m N m v a m N e o a r O N O N m m QI fp N O m m m N N O N 6 0 o r r o vi r m v .n r o 0 0 r o 0 o r v a rn N M vi m rv m ~ o .- O O O O O V Q r N e V ~ P N < O O O m o m o 0 of co ai m O m cd ai ~ d o 0 0 N N ~(l~ N O O V ~ O m M m O m m m 1D C''~N] M O m O O N N M m N r N m m N ~O ill O t7 O m O O N N O O O N O O m m O N e- ~- N m m N N T O~ 0i N W N O O O N O ~ a O ~ ry O ~ y N m~ ~ D ~ O O N O O N O M O O O N ~ C'' d N N N m ry N N (/ Q a C N ~ ~ o n 4 ^ c° a ~ ~ Q n n~ c .& M 7 Y C N m ~ H ` ~ ~ F' I-' O ° m F W ~ O O O O ~ ~ O O O N v O O M p m C C C~ p O ~ 9 y p N ~ ~ ~ p U lY ~ ~ ~ O C O O C O N N __• ~ N ~ OI 'O ~ °O 'O N e- A 't y N ' 1t W - O c w rv ~ A ` Q o O > ~ a °a O O > >i o ~ ~ m o U' C7 (7 U, .- N o m m m m o m m o~ m m T O O C (7 ~ ~ O ~ N N N N N ~ Q 01 9 O D ~ N C "O "O "O C 'L ~ a ~ 4E¢ ~a F< m F¢ m U G & H-134 a N o M ~ m m r w o H M O N r N M r 01 O OI 0o O m .- 1~ V N1 V' t0 m O ~O (O r M OI N O1 N N N Ol N O m M r d r NI r r m N o o 0 o 0 0 o v~ m m m M M M O o o 0 0 0 0 o ~ o O o a o 0 0 0 0 M~ O O ~ O N [O N N O O O mJ ' O O O O O O h M O O O O ` I O O O O O O O O O O M~ O O O O O M O N O O O of o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N°~ °0 0 0 0 0 ~ n o °o 00 0 roll .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .y O O m O M N N O o O r J O O O O O tO M o O O O N O O O O O O O O O OI o O O O r m O N V O g O I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d o o 0 0 0 o N o .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o o d o 0 0 0 o a c o 0 0 0 0 ~ Q U N N ^ OO~~ ~ ~ 0 v N N N C O O O O i Ip N O of o r o ~ v ui r o 0 0 ~ u x W m C D N ONI O N N ~ P m N V O O O d _ O N O ` O O m O~ m O O O O d M N N N N O~ N N m N IU O m M t0 ~O O F T N O O O O N M 10 N N N O v N N O N O O N •- O O m m O ^ d 0 0 N ~ m m W N O m m o m ° ~' o w ° O !` o O N ~ o N O P . ~ •• N _ O N N M N N a N O M N ~ (` m . /~ ^ -' i F ^2 O ~ m O m a ~ D n ~ ~ o n M y ~ Z ~ ~ lQ o 6 D ^ D F- f- ~ F' OI o M p 1 O N ~ O O N 0 O N ~ D Y ~ O D U Y ' ~ ~ ~ U 0 T ~ y L O f`1 O ~ R~ Y N . ~ p ~ N p p ry a N ~ o f N E R "P O ~ 2 O ~ O J ~S O ~ zi O ~, N T ~ ~ 3 4 i m T ' ~ O) O OI O D! i C _ O C~ C1 C O U .d. C ' N ^ N ry ^ ~ ~ W F ~ W 'd' ~ ~ ~ ~ > .> S .~ m D b v m "r m ~ ~ E O ~. D. .o m w rv m 5 3 ~ o ~ m w m m N N ~ v a d a a a ,~ m QI m R Q U N a E ~ ~ O O ~ m ~- N> E ~ a > m O v b ry .O O N ~ ~ a. ~n i-a a ~ ~ ~ o 0 • `~ u G & H-135 of u N N a a 0~7 r~ _• Q (") ~ ~ 0 Qj o m N m d in O fi `u N N m C a w a m 0 a N M m N N m a m a O C ~ W ~ E m B a ~ v ~ W o m ~ o W ~ o T V N O L r `o U N 0 N 0 N N m p N O L O 0 a 0 Q V N N 0 O U 7 C O U m V t0 N N 0 m N O m 0 0 a 0 U C '~ D ~ U m m o ~ 6 ~ W 0 ~ ~ K a o n W m c 0 2 O U Z (9 G & H-136 0 0 o N o o w m m ry n N m m N n ~n o vI m W O M O Y N N M n N N M h W O m O n O d' Q ^ M Q m P M V (O lO O lD h 1~ V N 0I N m R W N 61 N N M M N O O W M h O O W M n (V N C'1 C'I r M M O~ O O• O O h N w M M m 4l m M M O O O n n, M M g o rn m m M o rn w ~n M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O N N W N N N N N N N O O o M M O M O O 01 W N M O Ol m N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Oi O o 0 0' T O O O M M o N M M O N ~ 0 0 0 Q a M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w ~ o m w M m m m w M w m o 0 0 M M m v o 0 0 o w M o 0 o m M o 0 0 0 Ni .- ~ o o .- ~ 0 0 0 ~ .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O M W N O O M •(J N O O O a a o a o 0 0 o m M o 0 o aD M o o a o o ~ d o ~ ~ o a o ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 aq m m o o m m o in v w ro o ~n Q o 0 0 '*q co m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • O O O O O O N N O N N O O O O 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o o d o 0 0 0 n n O (p O r Q Q K m N m Q V w N O o Q n n O N O N w w Ol lO N O w OI O N N O N O M O ~ n n V m n w I+ V N I~ O O O n~ n O O O n Q Q OI N M m Q 61 N M ~ O r O O O O O O V Q n N Q Q V n N V O O O w m o 00 0 o w w m w o w m ai w o 0 0 0 N N N ~- Yl~ N O O V ~ O m M w ~- O m M tD ID IM?Ij M O M O O N N M IO N n N M •D N N m O t7 O m O O N N O O O N O O m m O N ~ ~ W W w N m W O• N N N O O O O 0 ~ ~ O O ~ 41 N ~ N N a ~ F O o O N M O O O N ~ M d N N O O W N N },'I O N cL N N ~ CL Y n l0 N n n O (O Q O. a. w C d Q `- M j It F ~ N N V ` F' ~ m D F' F ~ N F M p O _m _Ol O_I OI O O Q' O Y ~ O ~ 'O Y O U y N ~ S O N O ~ F O C j '~ ~ c A m A m N c o O > ~ a °v o O > ~ 0 `ry- N q O ~ ~ ~ C7 ~ N O ~ ~ C~ M N O c C C O m C (O m U N U~ N N N N N ~ N OI "O 9 D ~j m [71 D V V m L _ _ _ C = c ` ~ m N M~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ M~ a m m m' M~ ~ m m m m Q V ~~ N 1 N N m> j W> O m ~ E';, ~~ E'~ m Ets m' v d N F-Q FQ F-Q G & H-137 N O 1+1 ^ N W m N r it1 O N M O N r N M r OI O m m od d m r 6 M v rd e o td N N m M N O W M ~ N N O ~ M • n~ o o m m m M o 0 0 "~ o o O o o m .n M o O O o c o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 'I m o O 0 O 0 ~- 0 O o N m m v~ N M N o O 0 O 0 O 0 ^ 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 ° ° ° $ o ° 0 ° ° ° o, o o o 0 0 o o o 0 I o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o~ o m ~ N m m m ~0 0 0 0 `~ 0 0 0 0 o m M o 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 c 0 a O O m O M ~[] N O O O O O O O O O (p M O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • m 0 0 0 0 o o O o m o o O ~n o a 0 0 0 0 0 o o ~ m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d • m ' t V~ O O O O O N O r O O O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O _, OI O) O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ N ~ N O m O O o H o ~n O r o a m rv v o e ° ° _ ~ N f O O °~ m m tp ry ry O N M N m O r O r ^ V Vt r O O O - a - . m O O N M 11~~ r ~ Ql N M O ~ W O N N r N C O O O N O ^ O O m Ol N O O O O _ Ol a ' ~ .'. U ~ N ' I N N m N (° O m N m m N i ~2 i 01 N O O O O N tD fp ry W N O N N O N O O N ~- O O m m O N R L a o T ~ n a ~ rv ' m m m m m o 0 o °o ~ O N '~ ~ N N N ~ W N m N Vi y ` N N 1 _ 0 Q Q_ m , Q M ~ O O O d - O rn a N F- O .~ C F ° ' O1 d~ ~ a a 1 O ° ° ° m v o i ~~ M O 0 N C`J O IY O K W Y N a - ° C ~ (OV U N Y O1 ~ ~ M ~< ~ ~t o s 0 c 0 ~ 3 \ O > O ~ S ~ O ~ 2" E .I .n i. Y m m m m o c c c o v m ~ i 1~ ~ u m ~~ ~~ .y ~~ m v a a m 2 3 ~ m ~ m > E'~ Q m U a ~, i= r ~ a N a w a a N a 0 0 a 0 N a 0 a 0 a 0 u] Z a 0 a G & H-138 .e u ° ~ F ~ 4 v ~ p ~ ~ a Q v 4 m v m m M ~ E ~ •- 8 0 w N C ~° ~ l6 N d ~ d N Q ~ N O r, r N N N N h r r U N N O O N O O O O N O O o O ~ 0 0 a ° 0 0 0 0 a O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 ° ° O ° 9 m ~ q VI e ~ ° 5 , m ` w p i O I D n v ~ m v _ o O o O ~ Z o O o O 'm U v ° >. N p ~ j U) N N a o v N ~ Q 9 ry '~ CT o I M '° m ~ ° o d C7 o M in Q m v Q ¢ o 0 0 `m ~ o 0 0 I E E ° N - ~ H a 0 Q .~ m a v ~ m 'v F N w Z 4 v v w a E p a N to ~~~jjj .n m a m m (9 Z N 2 n ~ a ~ ~ o 4 ~ E C U m U N ~ v Q ~ T a A J F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ Q W V ~ O NQ Q Q ,,, m (9 J Z ~ = v n ~ a ~ ~ o d v E ~ U c U m ~ ayvi L Q E a n ~ ~-' ~ • G & H-139 • C n v d Q a m ~^ n m c '- ~ r ~ p~ m C p O O N ~ Ip r 2 R ~n O ' N O_ O_ O U N N N N N N O V ~ O O a o_ ~_ _ N N a N r p O O aJ o 0 p o 0 p M M M M X v v p ui 'r? Z ~ M M p o 0 K •- ~- a m aaa~~~ m N N w+ a ~ N O ~ S m ~ J 3 F O _6 E ~ E ~ E v c N 0 m m m o ,n ~ rv N o N ~ O m > a N O a f~ v O Z N 6 o ~ ~ c ~ 7 ~° M ~ c O 'o U ~ y n o O U rl d N a F ` m U a Q W L d N W a o W a o N ^ c o N U C U C ~ ut C O O C O C } N `/ ~j W O N N O N 0 ~ ~` N Q N W G & H -140 w v o o m o w o v o o m o O ~ n n p j O O _ N N ry N N O '- f' N y C O O O F m m N N N t0 r N O M M >` m of m of ~ o ~ ~ m m m m m m o m 1- U ~ ~ ~ ~' d Z 'm v n, v m o 0 >. ~ N o o O o m a v 1° U FT ~ ~ 0 c Z m v n w ~ m v m ~ m "~ v r n e a m ~n co ~n n N o .- o E ~ F n N E ~ ~ O~ U N ~ N a a U Q m ~ d O 0 0 °o O O N a y~ n O ,_ N p~ N ~ C J N 'o N N ~ ~C ~ n ~ V ~ O Q OI J ~ o N (7 ~ U ~ F OI J ~ ~ N n U ~ ~"' OI .J 0 ~ j0 vni V F 0 ~ 0 m U F N _ m J 0 0 ~ U F N _ d J ~ w m ~ o g 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 .- v E o m a0 ~ N _ 0 o ^ 0 n rn O ~ U Y V Ip O O O A OI O r ~ ~ m a o ;~ ry o 0 o m o m E Z 2~ m N o 0 o rv o ~ E 0 U U v n a o 0 ~ CI N O N E ~ .- m E 0 U T O O O O P O O _ O O O O O O % ~ N U c o Z n N C O L O d E 0 N m O~ d O o ~ o± o ~ m 0 O N m n m N m C O U o ~ o o C ~ j FO• O O O O N O O v ~ - m o L ~ E I~ IV O ~ V c ~ c N V g N N x° m p~ a ~ o ~ n ~ o m O N n O N r r C1 1`J N E 0 2 N N L N d O ~ O p U O C O O ~ _N O T M O y N Q O O ~ d A V ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~~ ` , .. ,~ E v M Y L ^ a E ` L E m ~' ~ m ~ U o ~ m O ` o ~ ~ m r m o .-° ~ n n ~ v x ~ O N ~ ~ y y pJ ~ V ~ N N O o N N ` ` ' ~p c. L w w r n p L p n ~ n o o c • • G & H-141 ~z .-~i.6___ ~. ~.,~~~.~ .,T--~„~- ~ r ~ E C O L O G I C A L S C I E N C E S, me General Habitat Suitability Evaluation f'i3-acre Site San Bernardino County, California • Prepared for: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 7285 SVL Box Victorville, CA 92392 Prepared by: Scott Cameron Ecological Sciences, Inc. 601 Glade Drive Santa Paula, CA 93060 805.921 0563 • April 2008 G & H-142 -.,,,, ^; ire ::.1. 'i ~; ,.`~~~~~ e:i, ii"' v~Fsd E C O L O G I C A L S C I E N C E S ro< April 15, 2008 Mr. Bruno Mancinelli 7285 SVL Box Victorville, CA 92392 SUBJECT: Results of General Habitat Suitability Evaluation, t13-acre Site, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Mancinelli: This letter report presents fndings of a reconnaissance-level survey conducted to generally evaluate the swtability of a ±13-acre site to support sensitive biological resources as part of the environmental review process. Introduction /Background The subject±l3-acre site is regionally located in San Bernardino County, California (Plate 1). Specifically, the project site is located at the southwest intersection of Interstate 15 and the 210 Freeway. The site occurs on the Cucamonga Creek USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle map (Plate 2). Projects proposed in this area that contain potentially suitable habitat to support sensitive biological resources must demonstrate to reviewing agencies [e.g., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS or Service), California Department of • Fish and Game (CDFG), County of San Bernardino (County), City of Rancho Cucamonga (City)] that potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources are adequately addressed and mitigated pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEDA), federal Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended, and other applicable environmental regulations as part of project approval. Biological surveys were previously conducted on the northern parcel (Phase I, 9.87-acres, APN 0228- 011-31,) in November 2002 by Ecological Sciences. The project (RV storage facility) was approved by the City on April 14, 2003 (DRC 2003-00046). The remaining southern ±3-acres (Phase II) are proposed for self-storage facility. As such, the intent of the current survey effort was to 1) update and revise (if necessary) existing biological conditions present on the Phase I site, and 2) survey the southern Phase II site in order to provide the applicant and resource agencies with preliminary biological information required for planning and permitting decisions concerning the proposed project. Due to the inherent limitations of unseasonal or habitat-based data, definitive conclusions regarding the actual presence or absence of selected sensitive biological resources cannot be made in this report. Therefore, conclusions relative to potential presence or absence of certain sensitive biological resources are based solely on the nature of habitat present This general analysis of biological resources is based on information compiled through field reconnaissance, literature review, and by applicable reference materials. Methods used in this study are outlined below. Methodology Scientific Literature Compilation and Review Documentation pertinent to the biological resources in the vicinity of the site was reviewed and analyzed. Primary data sources reviewed to evaluate the occurrence potential of special-status resources on the subject site, included, but were not necessarily limited to: (1) California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB 2007) and (2) California Native Plant Society (GNPs) on-line inventory for the Cucamonga • GO 1 Glade Dalve ~ SANTA PAULA, CA 93060 ~ Tel_ 805.921.0583 ~ FAx 805.921.0683 email: scameron@ecosciencesinc.com G & H-143 _ ~ r ! G ~ \ I iIJ ~ ' ~ t Y~ ~ l 1 V -ft ~ , 1 I d T / JI . Y, ^_! "A ~• I \ C / ~ ~ 1 lY ~ - ~ ` '7 : ~ t / ~ I imY 6 -~ ' i ~-~' ~- I ~ (tl \` .._ ~_. ~ . y, \-_, i =_<.. I .. /. _ _ - . - . x . .-~ rr ~ `S~ Onm' .. .. , ~i: 1. _al, .':L~ ,' 1., / I iI( I( / - . i _ - Y ~ _ ,~ _ ,. _... . ., - p J 1 ~ ` •. _ "__ - r '~ 7 ',-- ----- _- --- ~ I ------ - - - - -- _ _ _--- - ~ - -- - - '-- ~ -' .. _ _ _. -- - - -___ ~__: Project Site - , , _ - _ - ._- - _ - -_ - _ - ~ 4- - _- _ _ - _ - _ f': II1 0 _ - \ - _- ~\ - l " n+vwe / I _ I -~ _ ._ _ l ~ - L - , ._ _ - -- _ ~ ~. - ~ ~ - - - ,~~ ~ ~ ! ~.. vy i I . - - f / i - - (. ~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~ I . _ I _ Gnpe .- _ _- ~_~.~. I _ 1 ~ ri~~~~ .'. _ _ _ l. .I ~. `..u . - ri... .. -. .._ ~ ~. ~.~v..uw-. ~ ~ ~ Mno~ --_ ---- . . . _. ' ~ '-~ _ ~ ._. .__._ _._.. Mt.eau f.e0.. pp~ - iDToy^Q`°'d'GYPY'Id0199J Del^--. Ym'mWh h1D0YYM ~-/ISOOD S~.k:1~50,000 Deml ILO DU.m WG58J Gs.~ 1b ~ C} .innF~ ~ i yc~@ 41>- ?Ub g~ ECOLOGICAL S C ~ E N C E 5 March 2008 plate • • Regional Site Location 7 3-acre Site G & H-144 I ~' ~~~ j ~ 1~ ~' '. ,~., ._-..-~~ _ _ . _ _ _ ~ 'Summit Ave ' g I l == - - - - , A pp,,, ~ Ic. _ _ - -- - . _ _ ~ ---_ _ - - ~ it = iGsos ~~: ~.. _ _'--:'=! 68~i.n" ~_ I. _ _ - _1-- ~_ , l~ _ ~.~~~~ Project Site ~. _ ~ /,~__ d ~ : n r ,tl •i4i4: .. -..', ~: -_ ,-~` - ~ ~ I it t~ -_ - ,,.f~' ;' Well ~'~~ j . • til ~ . .. ~.. •, ~ r ~ ~=.r-~~~ '- ~ _ ___ ~_ 1 1 ~ _ __ Ill li ~ '1 - %~ -~•~ ,,IIII i ~ , . __ _ _ . 11 % ~.::Y ~...:.:~~ ~-+'w, y...^.._ ~~ :I..:~:... ' 1 L-_._.~-` ~. _ ~~ ~ - to I - ........ ..~,.. 133., ~ ,- 3~~ = (. _= =-_--' --_ - _..~_- ' -_'' =-_- II :1_ ~- ` ,~~ . ~ 1 •~CLT~ L _ _ _ _ ~ ~'•1 ~__ _/ I __ _ _ ,, ; > ,:, - ' '_ ~ _.- - 1 . _ _ iDTgmQvvt~(Igln~lu •h LMw Delalw };~mnm4 -~PYw> .`bmee lxlrn:OfG: ~~liih k.lir: 1: L' WO L4cv2140 I.nm t44'S! v.~.~.. _....~z de~.~' ~: f gT16.E$z• •EGOLOGICAL SC IE NGE 5 ~: March 2008 plate 2 Site Vicinity 13-acre Slte G & H-145 Peak, Devore, Guasti, and Fontana USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps, (3) available literature pertaining to habitat requirements of special-status species potentially occurring in the project site; and (4) • distribution data contained in Hall (1981); Grinnell and Miller (1944); Garrett and Dunn (1981); Holland (1986); Stebbins (1985); Hickman (1993), and CNPS (2001). Special-status or sensitive species are those that have been afforded special protection or recognition by federal, state, or local resource conservation agencies due principally to declining or limited populations, mainly as a result of habitat reduction. 2008 Field Survey Ecological Sciences, Inc. biologists conducted a reconnaissance-level field survey to update 'and characterize on-siie habitats and to evaluate their potential to support sensitive species on February 26, 2008. Plant species and vegetation communities were primarily identified by walking transects over portions of the site. All direct observations of wildlife were recorded, as was wildlife sign. In addition to species actually detected, expected use of the site by other wildlife was evaluated from habitat analysis of the site, combined with known habitat preferences of locally occurring wildlife species. The site was also evaluated for the potential presence of plant, animal, or habitats considered rare, threatened, sensitive, endangered, or otherwise unique by regulatory or resource agencies. Weather conditions during the February 2008 survey included relatively clear skies (2% cloud cover), slight breeze to occasional gusts (1-8 mph) and air temperatures of 74-87 °F. Existing Biological Conditions The site generally characterized as a relatively undisturbed site supporting remnant scrub/alluvial habitat that forms an often dense vegetative coverage. This remnant mixed scrub vegetation occurs on a flat upland terrace adjacent to the concrete-lined Etiwanda Flood Control Channel On-site vegetation is no longer exposed to fluvial processes (due to channelization of the area) resulting in an overgrown, mature vegetative phase. The habitat is mostly intact, but isolated by existing development. The southern portion of the site supports a much lower and open shrub canopy. Woodchip debris piles are present in the • northern portion of the site. Some historic scraping/discing is evident. Surrounding land uses include the concrete-lined Etiwanda Flood Control Channel to the west, followed by development; the 210 Freeway/Interstate 15 transition to the east; the 210 Freeway to the north; and Interstate 15 to the south. Elevation at the site is approximately 1360 above msl. Plates 3a and 3b illustrate existing site conditions. Vegetation Holly-leaved cherry (Prunus ilicifolia ssp. ilicifolia), skunkbrush (Rhus trilobata), and elderberry (Sambucus mexicana) were the most common larger shrubs/trees recorded on site. Additional shrubs included scattered California buckwheat (Eriogonum (ascicula[um), chamise (Adenostoma fasciculatum), California broom (Lotus scoparius), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), black sage (Saliva mellifera), white sage (Saliva apiana), ceanothus (Ceanothus spp.), goldenbush (Ericameria sp.), yerba Santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx), chaparral mallow (Ma/acothamnus fasciculafus), goldenbush (Ericameria sp.), poison oak (Toxicodendron diversilobum), scale-broom (Lepidospartum squamafum), beardtongue (Penstemon spectabilis), and groundsel (Senecio sp ). Other plant species present included prickly pear cactus (Opuntia littoralis), cholla (Opuntia sp.), Our lord's candle (Yucca whipplel), and tree tobacco (Nlcobana glauca). Dominant grasses and fortis include rye (Leymus condensatus), ripgut (Bromus diandrus), foxtail chess (Bromus madritensis ssp. rubens), leymus (Leymus condensatus), filaree (Erodium cicutarium), California Croton (Croton californicus), fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesil), wild cucumber (March macrocarpus), sun cup (Camissonia sp.), pygmy-weed (Crassula connata), California everlasting (Gnaphalium californicum), tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), horseweed (Conyza canadensis), mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), ..,_ at)D91 Mr Bruno Mancinelli April 15, 200a Page 4 G & H-146 • ~:~w. r +g' ~~ F ti 1 f~~- .~~i ~' ~. - ~ '~+~~ b. y '~ Z -`~ ,* ,n~ ' ~.e s~ c~ ~ ~ ~M,` View to north I a tf}r x~ t r ~ q " y ~~ a , + ~ ' i. ~- . ,, r ... _. ,, ,. . . . Vievr to south ~: ~: = ~:~. • _te. ~tt~ ~.... CC ins= ~~?~~_ ~R= ~ ~ F E C O L O G I C A L SCIENCE S March 2008 plate 3 Q Site Photographs 13-acre Site G & H-147 View to west View to east ~~= rr+~ =11t ~~ ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE S March 2008 plate 3 b Site Photographs 13-acre Site • • G & H-148 • CAVFM PML Area Kev; CG; California Gnatcatcher CM9; California Mastiff Bat CAVFM: Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh CWW: California Walnut Woodland MYF: Sierra Madre Yellow-legged Frog PML: Plummer's Mariposa Lily RAFSS: Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub SDHL: San Diego Horned Lizard SSARW; Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland SBKR; San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (McKernan 1997) Scale: 1: 50,000 gGt~sytr~~ L~~ i4i ~'~`. ~~~ EG~Ld GICAL • S C I E N C E 5 r~larch 2008 plate 4 Special-Status Species Records for Site Vicinity 13-acre Site G & H-149 London rocket (Sysimbrium irio), comb-bur (Pectocarya pemcillata), Eucrypta (Eucrypta chrysanfhemifolia), popcorn flower (Plagiobothrys collinus var. californicus), Rancher's fireweed (Amsinckia menziesil), coyote melon (Cucurbita palmata), and tocolote (Centaurea melOtensis). • Wildlife Wildlife specles directly observed on site included American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), Say's phoebe (Sayornis saya), California towhee (Pipilo crissalis), scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), white-throated swift (Aeronautes saxatalis), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), northern mockingbird (Mimus potyg/ottos), and house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus). Common small mammals recorded, or of which sign was detected, included coyote (Canis, latrans), California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyr), desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubom), pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae), and kangaroo rat (Dipodomys sp.). Common reptile species observed included side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana). Soi! Conservation Map Review Soils present on site were generally characterized by friable soils v~ith some scattered cobbles and gravel. Based on a review of the Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California, U.S Department of Agriculture (1980), the subject site contains Tujunga gravelly loamy sand (TvC) and Soboba gravelly loamy sand (SoC). Special-Status Biological Resources Evaluafion Discussed in this section are plant and wildlife species potentially present in the study area that have been afforded special recognition by federal or state agencies In addition, plants included on Lists 1, 2, 3, or 4 of the CNPS inventory are also considered of special-status. Vegetation communities that are unique, of relatively limited distribution, or of particular value to wildlife and considered sensitive by state and/or federal resource agencies are also discussed Special-status species known from the region that potentially occur on site are summarized below in • Table 1 (Plants), and Table 2 (Wildlife) based on review of the 2007 CNDDB electronic database and/or CNPS on-line electronic inventory and other data. The occurrence potential of the special-status species present below is based on results of a reconnaissance-level field survey, habitat types present, and occurrence records of sensitive species from the site vicinity. Vegetation communities that are unique, of relatively limited distribution, or of particular value to wildlife and considered sensitive by state and/or federal resource agencies are also generally discussed. No focused botanical or zoological surveys were conducted. Plate 4 (previous page) illustrates CNDDB locality information for the site vicinity. Special-Status P/ant Species No special-status plant species was detected on site during the reconnaissance survey, although several species not observed during the survey effort have aloes-moderate to moderate occurrence potential. Special-status plant specles known from the region that potentially occur within the protect site are summarized below in Table 1. Table 7 Special-Stafus Plant Species Known from the Site Vicinityt ~COmmbn Name.~ ~ ~~.'~:~ ~Status"~;~t~,~-~ ~~ ~~r,Habrtat+~°~~ ,-,Flowenng~' ~Occurrence~~@ , ~ .:SnentificdName~~„`~;Federalu ~.fStat`e~~/CNPS,y ;,...Re tiireme`nts-r:._,=v,Penod;`„ ~Potential~'x.`i Listed 5 ecies Marsh sandwort FE CE 1 B -Swamps and marshes May-August Not Expectetl: Arenana paludicola suitable habitat not resent a~w.Wr)71J ~~~~NLe~~ Mr. Bruno Mancmelh • Apnl 15, 2008 Page 8 G & H-150 u • Table 1-continued Special-Status Plant Species Known from the Site Vicinity' F"cCvominon~.Natrie-;"+"'~~' ~ rici~,eu`T'lv.,'iSR'1$~~3~ ;~~,~,.,.,AP.~-k,„;YSta`tus>:~.,4'a,Sr.~~, .-,'t 5~1-`?s°~FatiltaY~''~=~y'-~ 4°+-Gww.jitSY-' ~l'~~:~E'_ ~ "~>_~Flowerin`r~~9s ^.~x~ ~' Ta n^ f-"Occurfeitce~'-v "avx~ 4.-5x ~~'C ?„SSP~SLr~' r rlSclenhfic,Name~,'s:. ' D lL., ~S.Fe`deFrali:<?'Sfat~ "CNP,S~'" _ = . ~,'~"rRe wrements ~-~.~ . i. ,-_~.,~'--s,P..enodt~„?, .~ ' . ~~ -P.oten6al;;k;~; Thread-leavetl brodia FE CE 1 B Vernal pools, scrub, March-June Not Expectetl: Brodlaea frlifolia woodland, grasslantls suitable habitat with cla soils not resent Slender-horned FE CE 1 B Chaparral, alluvial fan April-June Not Expected: spineflower sage scrub; terraces suitable habitat Dodecahama and washes ~ not present /epfocera5 Gambel's watercress FE CT 78 Fresh or brack+sh April- Not Expected: Ronppa gambelii marshes September suitable habitat not resent Santa Ana River FE SE 1 B Coastal scrub (alluwal June- No[ Expected: woollystar fan) September suitable habitat Enastrum densilolium ~ not present on ssp. sancrorum ~ site; outside species known range, known only from Santa Ana River Other 5 ecial-status S ecies Wooly mountain- - - 1 B Subalp+ne coniferous May- Not Expectetl: parsley forest, upper montane September suitable habitat Oreonana vesfrta coniferous forest not resent Prostrate navarretia - -- 1 B Coastal scrub, April-July Not Expected: Navametia prostrate grasslands, vernal swtable habdat ocls/alkaline soils not resent California muhly -- -- 4 Chaparral, coastal July- Not Expectetl: Muhlenbergra sage, lower montane September suitable habitat tali/ornica coniferous forest near not present streams or see s San Gabriel Iinanthus -- -- 1 B Lower and upper Apnl-July No[ Expected: Lmanfhus concinnus montane coniferous swtable habitat forest not resent Robinson's -- -- 18 Chaparral, sage scrub January-July Low-Moderate pepperg rass Potential: Lep+dium wrginicum sortable habdat var robmsonu resent Johnston's -- - 1B Subalpine coniferous July- Not Expected: buckwheat forest September suitable habitat Enogonum net present mrcrothecum var. ohnstonu Pierson's spring - - 1 B Upper montane May-June Not Expected: beauty coniferous forest suitable habitat Clayfoma lanceolate not present var eirsonn Plummet's manposa FSC -- 18 Chaparral, coastal May-July Moderate lily scrub, cismontane Potential: Calochortus woodlands suitable habitat lummerae resent Bristly sedge - - 2 Freshwater marshes, May- Not Expected: Carex comosa coastal praise, September swtable habitat grasslands not present on site San Bernardino FSC -- 18 Mesic montane June-August Not Expected: Mountains owl's meadows, seeps and suitable habitat clover chaparral not present Castillealas+orh ncha iae. 6111 Mr Bruno Manc+nel0 Apnl 15, 2008 Page 9 G & H-151 Table 1-continued Specie/-Status Plant Species Known from the Site Vicinity' sCo~M`rn~o'n~Na'm`eJ~;j ~ !'~,'r,,-,~'t;~=?Status?:;~+z„'4~"? ','~.3'c~Hatiltatx^~rt~= FloiveFiiig e ~ .';'~~O_ccu~~en'ce 'ScieittiflclName' ~~ tl 'Feileralw :?>Statek" f~CNP.S?ii ~~Re ulrements~= iPenod--°`-. -."~ ->•.Potential;;,;~ h White-bracted - - 18 Pinyon Iunlper Apnl-June Low Potential: ' spineflower woodland and desen marginally Chonzanthe xantii var. scrub suitable habitat leucotheca resent Hot springs -- - 2 Meatlows near hat July- Low Potential: fimbdstylis springs September marginally Fmhnstylis thermals suitable habitat resent California bedstraw FSC - 18 Sandy, granitic soils in May-July Not Expected: Galmm ca0fomrcum chapa«als at lower smtahle habitat ss . pnmum ed a of ine belt not present Mesa horkelia -- - 18 Sandy, gravelly sites in February- Low Potential: HorkeGa cuneata ssp. coastal sage September marginally puberula scrub/chaparral suitable habitat habitats resent Lemon lily FSC - 1 B Mesic areas in July-August Not Expected: Lilium parryi coniferous forests suitable habitat not present on site Los Angeles FSC - 1A Coastal salt and August- Not Expectetl: sunflower freshwater marshes October suitable habitat HeOanthus nuttallri not present on spp. panshu sde; last seen m 1937 Parish's desert-(horn - - 2 Sandy to rocky soils in March-April Low Potential: Lycmm panshu coastal and Sonoran marginally desert scrubs suitable habitat resent Pringle's monardella FSC -- 1A Sandy, coastal scrub May-June Low Potential: Monardella pnnglei marginally sutable habitat resent Parish's gooseberry -- - 1B Riparian woodlands February-April Not Expected: Ri6es dvancatum var. swtable habitat anshn not resent Smooth tarplant FSC _ 1B Alkaline grasslands, April- Not Expectetl: Centromadia meadows, playas, September suitable habitat un ens ss laews scrub habitats not resent Black sedge -- - 2 Marshes and swamps August- Not Expected: Schoenus nighcans September suitable habitat not resent Salt spring - - 2 Chaparral, coastal and March-June Low Potential: checkerbloom desen scrubs, forests, marginally Srdalcea alkaline playas suitable habitat neomexrcana resent Parry's spinegower FSC - 3 Chaparral antl coastal April-June Low-Moderate Chonzanthe parryr scrub; associated with Potential: some ssp. panyi sandy or rocky suitable habitat ppenlp 5. resep( Southern California - - 4 Chaparral, cismontane March-May Not Expected: 61ack walnut woodland, coastal would likely have Juglans cali(omicus scrub been recorded if var. calr(omrca resent Praine wetlge grass - - 2 Mesic meadows antl April-July Not Expected: Sphenopholls woodlands, seeps suitable habitat obtusata not resent J • m. ~e..Qlt~}~1 - ~~,~..~.e- Mr. Bruno Mananel0 • Apnl 15, 2008 Page 70 G & H=152 r ~J Table 1-continued Special-Status Plant Species Known from the Site Vicinity' Status: Federal-U S Fish antl Wiltllife Service FE: Federally Endangered FT: Federally Threatened Species FPE: Federally Proposed Endangered FPT: Federally Proposed Threatened FC Federal Candidate Species FSC: Fetleral Species of Concern State-California Deoartment of Fish and Game CE: State Endangered CT: State Threatened CNPS Ust 1A: Plants presumed e#inct in California List 18: Plants rare and endangered in California and elsewhere List 2: Plants rare and endangered in California, but more common elsewhere List 3' Taxa about which more information is needed List 4. Plants of limitetl tllslnbution Special-Status Wildlife Species No special-status wildlife species were directly observed on site, although several species not observed during the survey effort have a moderate or high occurrence potential. Sensitive wildlife species potentially occurring on the project site are summarized below in Table 2. Table 2 Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity' ~~,Coiri~rtion7Name~;t;~~ ' ' %~t~~=~~'-,~x~~:~5tatu`s';"=:t::~;,~,''~`P3? ~'s"yl?FlaliltatiR'e"ijuifementsm~ '°- "' : ~ ' ~ rµrt~OccurceiiceiP_otential'~!;,;;+; -'i * vz(a ~ ~ Y csvx tlF k.~ ag+aE a 7 e i N ` rsr irtvn q x' S e e a ' a e ' ti = '~ wr ~~ T wr "i y: -sSi~ ' a~4kX ` - ~' ' , ., ttu , 1'; iu^' Sr_ 5"' e ~~,;~~ ~ ~: ° 5 QSci nt ficr ame .~:'<,. , r 'F. d l:,:,r:,, i~ t t ,~, ~~ . 4 .;1+<:tr. ~~R ,~ :. ~ f=. ~,, t r: ; + ~: ,. ~,-: dw d INVERTEBRATES Delhi Sands flower- FE -- Open, sandy (Delhi soils), dune Not Expec[etl: suitable loving Fly areas supporting buckwheat, habitat not present Rhaphrom~das Croton, telegraph weed terminatus abdomma65 Greenest tiger beetle - - Woodlantls adjacent to Santa Not Expected: suitable Crcindela Ana River Basin habitat not present Iranquebahca vmdissima AMPHIBIANS AND REP TILES ' Western spadefoot - CSC Relatively open grasslands, Not Expected: suitable toad scrublands, and woodlands habitat not present Scaphropus wdh fne, loose soil hammondri Siena Madre yellow- FPE CSC Aquatic habitats Not Expectetl: suitable legged frog habitat not present on site; Rana muscosa proposed listing refers to populaGOns m the San Gabriel, San Jacinto, and San Bernardino Mtns San Gabriel -- • Rocks, ferns, wood, base of No[ Expected: suitable Mountains slender talus slopes in San Gabriel habitat not present salamander Mtns Batrachose s abhefi San Diego horned FSC CSC Relatively open grasslands, Low-Moderate Potential: lizartl scrublands, and woodlands some suitable habitat present Phrynosoma with fine, loose soil coronatum 6lamvtllii Orange-throated FSC CSC Relatively open grasslands, Low Potential: marginally whiptail scrublands, and woodlands suitable habitat present Cnemrdophoms with fine, loose soil h pe hrus beldinpr • eQ\v.. c~~'. Mr Bruno Mancmelli April 15, 2008 Page 11 G & H-153 Ta61e 2-continued Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity' sCom-Trion€Narne'=~!u s~,yg.,...~.;~. ~kz ~s~- ' r "' '~=`=~=r~~~ °y ~" ~..v.--- ' - - trK"'H5b'itatiRe "ui'rements':- x '~' r 1~s:,~- ( ~ " y ~'`= ~Oco'uc~en`ce Pnteritial '" ~ t ~ ce° ~ . Wi `SC~entfT_rc'Name ~, ;_ - ceu N-. t -a - - ~`+-`$t3te3~yi --z,Federe l,....,: ,,. ~ ~v~c ~ 4"ai. ~.. ~''.r=~~ =fir ~r<-~~- .,,~:,~~ , . ".~F?~ v'~~:r'y~ ,z~.,:ra, Coastal western - • Sage scrub, chaparral, Low-Moderate Potential: whiptail grassland some suitable habitat present Cnemidophorus 6gns mulhscutarus Northem red diamond - CSC Sage scrub, chaparral, Low Potential: marginally rattlesnake grasslands suitable habitat present Crofalus Tuber Tuber Southwestern pond -- CSC Permanent or nearly permanent Not Expected: smlable turtle bodies of water wdh basking habitat not present Clemmys marmorata sites alhda Rosy boa FSC - Desert and chaparral with Not Expected: suitable Lrchanu2 frivirgata moderate to dense vegetation habitat not present and rock cover BIRDS White-tailed kite MNBMC CFP Open vegetation antl uses Moderate Potential: possibly Elanus leucurus dense woodlands for cover forages over the site; no suitable nestin habitat Northem harper - CSC Coastal salt marsh, freshwater Moderate Potential: possibly Circus cyaneus marsh, grasslands, and forages over the site; no a ncultural gelds smlable nestin habitat Swainson's hawk - CT Breeds in stands with few trees Low Potential: may Buteo swainsonr such as juniper, riparian areas. occasionally forage over the Forages over grasslands, site dunng migration; no agdcultural felds supporting suitable nesting habitat rodent o ulations. resent Ferruginous hawk FSC, CSC Grasslantls, agricultural fields, Low-Moderate Potential Buleo rega05 MNBMC and open scrublands possibly forages over the site as seasonal migrant; does not breed in area. Golden eagle - CSC, CFP Mountains, deserts, and open Low Potential: may Aquila chrysaetos country occasionally forage over the site; no suitable nesting habitat resent Coopers hawk - CSC Dense stands of Irve oaks and Not Expected: suitable Accr rter coo erii ri arian woodlands. habitat not resent Prairie falcon - CSC Grasslands, savannas, Low-Moderate Potential: Falco mexicanus rangeland, agncultural fields, may fo2ge over the site in and~desed scrub; requires winter, no suitable nesting sheltered cliff faces for shelter habitat resent Burrowing owl FSC, CSC Grasslantls and open scrub Low-Moderate Potential; Athene cuniculaha MNBMC some suitable habitat resent Long-earetl owl - CSC Riparian bottomlands to tall Not Expected: suitable Asw otus willows and cottonwootls; oaks habitat not present ales stream courses Mountain plover PT CSC Agricultural areas, fallow fields, Not Expected: suitable Charadnus monfanus rasslands, raises habitat not resent Least Bell's vireo FE CE Willow dominated riparian Not Expected: suitable Vireo belle usillus habitat wdh dense understo ri arian habitat not resent Southwestern willow FE -- Riparian habitats along rivers, Not Expected: suitable gycatcher streams, or other wetlands ripanan habitat not present Emprdonax t2il0i usually with standing water exhmus Tricolored blackbird - CSC Grasslands, wetland areas wdh Not Expected: swtable A elaius tncolor cattails, bulrushes, willows habitat not resent on site California horned lark -- CSC Grasslands, disturbed areas, Low Potential: marginally Eremophrla alpesrns agriculture fields, and beach suitable habitat present acfia areas • • w ati .~r/I)J ~~~~~~<~~ Mr Bruno Mancinelli . Apnl 75, 2008 Page 72 G & H-154 Table 2-continued • Specia/-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinityl ~.COmmon Name- ~. ~,` ;Status f~ -~` x P' Habitat+Requfrements ~ , -Occurrence Potential --~- .~ ;.SaientlflclName';_?_.~~ >y~ Federal;~= State= h syn. _,~z~'_,~.F„,,~w,F:^? "*sz. ~ ~ ~, „'w:~,=_,'~^.s~~ ,. __ ~ California coastal FT CSC Coastal sage scrub in areas of Low Potential: marginally gnatcatcher Flal or gently sloping terrain suitable habitat present Pohophla ca0formca ca6fornica Loggerhead shrike - CSC Grasslands with scattered High Potential: potentially Lanms ludowcranus shrubs, trees, fences or other suitable habitat present erches 5 California rufous- -- CSC Coastal sage scrub, grasslantls Moderate Potential: crowned sparrow potentially suitable habitat Armophrla ruficeps present canescens Bell's sage sparrow MNBMC CSC Coastal sage scrub, chaparral Moderate Potential: Amphrsp¢a bel6 belly potentially suHable habitat resent MAMMALS Long-eared myotis FSC -- Found in nearly all brush, Low Potential: potential Myohs evohs woodland, and forest habitats foraging habitat from sea level to at least 9.000 n Small-fooled myotis FSC -- And wootled and brushy Low Potential: potential Myohs crlrolabrum uplands near water from sea foraging habitat level [o at leas) 9,000 ft. Fnnged myotis FSC -- Ufilrzes open habitats and early No[ Expected: lack of Myofrs thysanodes successional stages, streams, potennal foraging and nesLng takes, and ponds from sea level habitat to al least 9,350 ff Long-legged myotis FSC -- Fountl in nearly all brush, Low Potential: potenbal Myofrs volans woodland, and forested foraging habitat habitats from sea level to arountl 9,000 fl. Yuma myotis FSC CSC Found in a variety of habitats; Not Expected: lack of Myohs yumanensrs optimal habitats are open potential foraging and nesLng forests and woodlands with habitat sources of water over within to feed Spotted baf FSC CSC Deserts, scrublands, chaparral, Low Potential: potential Euderma maculafa and comferous woodlands fora in habitat Pale big-eared bat FSC CSC Utilizes a variety of Not Expected: lack of Corynorhmus (Full (Full communities, including conifer potential foraging and nesting fownsendri pallescens Species) Species) and oak woodlands and forests, habitat and grasslands and tleserts, and high-elevation forests and meadows Pallitl bat -- CSC Arid habitats, including Not Expectetl: lack of Antrozous pallydus grasslands, shrublands, potential foraging and nesting woodlands, and forests; prefers habitat rocky outcrops, cliffs, and crevices with access to open habitats for fora in Western mastiff bat FSC CSC Pnmarily and lowlands and Low Potential: may forage Eumops perohs (ssp. coastal basins wdh ragged, over the sde; no sortable calrformcus cahformcus) rocky terrain, along with nesting habitat present suitable crevices for da -roosts Western yellow bat -- -- Valley foothill riparian, desert Low Potential: potential Lasrurus xanfhmus riparian, desert wash, palm foraging habitat oasis habitats Pocketed free-tailed -- CSC And areas, desert scrub, desert Low Potential: potential bat wash, desert riparian foraging habitat Nychnomops femorosaccus Mr Bruno Manclnelll Apnl 15, 2008 Page 13 i G & H-155 Table 2-continued Special-Status Wildlife Species Known from the Site Vicinity' ,Cornmori Name '~' ` Status fi'~ +s- "~~Habltat Requirements . -Occurrence`%Potenttal - r:Sc/enbfic}Jame' a '3~.Federa6:+~r~i Stater;=-~ ~';,~~i..~:.„w-1 ~.,- a p' ,~' . `- ;s•?x ,--, ~..~-r,~>~^~ ..1.,-. San Diego black-tailed -- CSC Grasslands, shrublands High Potential: potentially jackrabbit suhable habitat present Lepus calrformcus bennettli Northwestern San -- CSC Open shrublands, sandy areas Low-Motlerate Potential: Diego pocket mouse some suitable habitat present Chaetodipus fallax fallax Pallid San Diego -- CSC Coastal scrub, chaparral, Low Potential: site not likely pocket mouse grassland within species range Chaetodipus californicus allydus Los Angeles pocket FSC CSC Grasslands, open sage scrub Low-Motlerate Potential: mouse some suitable habitat present Perognathus longimembris brewnasus San Bernartlino FE CSC Alluvial habitats with coastal Low Potential: marginally kangaroo rat scrub, chaparral, grassland suitable habitat present; site Dipodomys memami not exposed to Fluvial parvus processes Stephens' kangaroo FE CE Grasslands, open sage scrub Not Expected: suitable habitat rat not present Di Odom s ste hensr San Diego desert - CSC Moderate to dense sage scrub; Moderate Potential: suitable woodral rocky outcrops habitat present Neotoma leprda mtermedia Tahle 2 Kevr'Rased primarily on review of 2Fl07 CNDDB Status: (nesting) =For most taxa the CNDDB is interested in sightings for the presence of resident populations For some s eces nmanl buds ,the CNDDB onl tracks certain arts of the s ecies ran a or life histe a ., neslin locatmns Federal-U S. Fish and Wildlife Service State- California Department of Fish and Game FE' Federally Endangered CE: California Endangered FT: Federally Threatened CT: California Threatened FPE~ Federally Proposed Endangered CCE. California Candidate (Endangeretl) FPT: Federally Proposed Threatened CCT: California Candidate (Threatened) FC: Federal Candidate for listing as CFP California Fully Protected threatenetl or endangered CP: California Protected FSC: Federal Species of Concern-not CSC California Special Concern formally protected under law ~ ~ California Special Animal (species with no official MNBMC: Migratory Nongame Birds of federal or stale status, but are inclutled on Management Concern (not shown for CDFG's Special Animals list) federally listed or proposed4hreatened or endan ereds ecies Special-Status Habitats Special-status habitat types are vegetation communities that support concentrations of sensitive plant or wildlife species, are of relatively limited distribution, or are of particular value to wildlife (CNDDB). Although sensitive habitats are not necessarily afforded legal protection unless they support protected species, potential impacts to them may Increase concerns and mitigation suggestions by resources agencies. Special-status habitats known from the site vicinity per review of CNDDB (2007) Include Riversldean alluvial fan sage scrub, Coastal and valley freshwater marsh, southern riparian forest, southern sycamore alter riparian woodland, and California walnut woodland. Remnants of alluvial fan sage scrub and Riversldean sage scrub are present on site. • • ~w E~i~l • Mr Bruno Mancmel6 Apnl 15, 2008 Page 74 G & H-156 Jurisdictional Resources • Regulatory Framework Drainages, streambed, and creeks are potentially considered "waters of the United States" subject to jurisdiction by the USACOE under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In addition, a 1603 agreement with CDFG would be required prior to any disturbances upon stream-associated habitats (e.g., riparian). Based on review of the Cucamonga Peak USGS quadrangle map and site survey results, no blue-line, other drainage features and/or riparian habitats are present on site The concrete-lined Etiwanda Creek Flood Control Channel occurs west and adjacent to the site. Wildlife Movement Corridors The proposed project site is essentially surrounded by existing development, and therefore, it is highly unlikely that the subject site occupies an important location relative to regional wildlife movement. As such, project implementation would not be expected to have any substantial effect on local or regional wildlife movement Discussion Potential Constraints Posed by Sensitive Biological Resources Constraints posed by biological resources upon development of the project site were generally evaluated by ranking the following sensitive biological issues, listed in descending order of significance: (1) a federally or state-listed endangered or threatened species of plant or animal; (2) streambeds, wetlands, and their associated vegetation; (3) habitats suitable to support a federally or state-listed endangered or threatened species of plant or wildlife; (4) species designated as candidates for federal listing; (6) habitat, other than wetlands, considered sensitive by regulatory agencies or resource conservation organizations; and (6) other species or issues of special concern to agencies, resource conservation organizations, or other interest groups. The level of constraint that a sensitive biological resource would pose to potential • development typically depends on the following criteria: (1) the relative value of that resource; (2) the amount or degree of impact to the resource; (3) whether or not impacts to the resource would be in violation of state and/or federal regulations or laws; (4) whether or not impacts to the resource would require permitting by resource agencies; and (5) the degree to which impacts on the resource would otherwise be considered "significant" under CEQA. The actual or potential presence of sensitive biological resources (special-status species) on the project site could impose some degree of constraint on development depending upon the nature of both direct and indirect impacts on these resources, as well as on the particular species and seasonal timing of construction activities During permitting procedures, certain measures (generally described below) to avoid or further reduce potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources may be necessary pursuant to CEQA and the Act. An evaluation of whether or not an impact on biological resources would be substantial must consider both the resource itself and how that resource fits into a regional or local context Substantial impacts would be those that would diminish, or result in the loss of, an important biological resource, or those that would obviously conflict with local, state, or federal resource conservation plans, goals, or regulations Directed biological surveys for certain biological resources may be required by reviewing agencies prior to development (conducted during appropriate survey periods). Results of additional surveys (if required) would be used to make a definitive presence/absence determination for certain potentially occurring species, and more fully evaluate impact significance prior to site development. If listed species (i.e., threatened or endangered) were later determined to be present within areas proposed for impacts, then additional measures would be necessary prior to construction to further reduce and/or mitigate for potential impacts to sensitive resources. m: • ~o ~~r Mr. Bruno Mancinelli Apnl 15, 2008 Page 15 G & H-157 No special-status plant species were directly recorded on site during the survey effort. Most species known from the site vicinity are not expected due to absence of suitable habitat. However, Plummer's • mariposa lily, Parry's spineflower, and Robinson's peppergrass have either a moderate or low-moderate occurrence potential. These plant species have not been assigned any formal state or federal rarity designation, but are considered federal species of concern, CNPS List 1B, and/or List 3 species. Development of the site would remove a portion of potentially suitable habitat and could result in the elimination of individual plants (if present) where development and plant occurrence are coincidental. Nonetheless, site development would not likely eliminate CEQA-significant amounts of habitat for these special-status plant species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. No special-status wildlife species were directly recorded on site during the February 2008 survey effort. However, several species have a moderate and/or high occurrence potential including loggerhead shrike, Bell's sage sparrow, southern California rufous-crowned sparrow, San Diego black-tailed jackrabbit, and desert woodrat. These species were deemed by the Service to be too widespread and common to warrant listing as threatened or endangered, and as such, were removed from formal sensitive species status. At present, they have no state or federal listing status. Project impacts to these species would include a small loss of potential breeding and/or seasonal foraging habitat locally, neither of which would likely be considered significant. Site development would not likely eliminate significant amounts of habitat for these special-status species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. If other potentially occurring special-status species are present (low-moderate occurrence potentials), they are likely uncommon on such a small and isolated site (e.g., coastal western whiptail, coast (San Diego) horned lizard, northwestern San Diego pocket mouse, Los Angeles pocket mouse). Accordingly, development impacts would not likely constitute a signifcant adverse impact, nor amount to a measurable impact to these species within southern California or their overall range. No direct observations or western burrowing owl sign (feathers, pellets, fecal material, prey remains, etc.) were recorded during the survey. However, California ground squirrel burrows potentially suitable to accommodate owls were recorded on site. None of the potential burrows inspected during the survey effort were determined to be currently occupied or recently used by burrowing owls based on the lack of owl observations and absence of sign around burrow entrances. Despite that fact that the site is • surrounded by existing development, the burrowing owl (low-moderate occurrence potential) may occur in less than optimal conditions. While the burrowing owl and other potentially occurring native avian species are not protected by state or federal endangered species acts, these species are protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 (16 U.S.C. 703-711) and CDFG Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3800 which prohibits take, possession, or destruction of birds, their nests or eggs (in particular raptor species). If it were later determined that actwe nests would be lost or indirectly impacted as a result of site-preparation, it could result in adverse impacts and would be in conflict with these regulations. Specific burrowing owl survey protocol and mitigation guidelines were developed and described in a 1995 CDFG Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Zorn 1974,) to reduce protect-related impacts to burrowing owls (and used for other native avian species). If site preparation activities occur during the nesting season of the burrowing owl/native nesting species (generally February 1 through August 31), a pre-construction burrowing owl/nesting avian survey (within 30 days of construction) is recommended to determine if active nests of species protected by the MBTA and/or CDFG are present in the construction zone for CEQA compliance and subsequently evaluate appropriate measures that may reduce potential adverse project-related impacts. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the site should be resurveyed if suitable habitat is present. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed (pursuant to 1995 CDFG guidelines) until the young have hatched and fledged (matured to a stage that they can leave the nest on their own) Take of active nests must be avoided. If owls must be moved away from the disturbance area, passive relocation techniques (where applicable outside of the breeding season) should be used rather than trapping (CDFG Staff Report 1995). At least 4inN~~9/ • Mr Bruno Mancmelli April 76, 2008 Page 16 G & H-158 one or more weeks would be necessary to accomplish passive translocation and allow for owls to • acclimate to alternate burrows (CDFG 1995). If avoidance is the preferred or accepted mitigation method, no grading or heavy equipment activity should take place within at least 75 meters (±250 feet) of an active nest during the breeding season, and 50 meters (±160 feet) during the non-breeding season (CDFG 1995). If additional surveys confrm that the site is occupied, appropriate mitigation measures to minimize impacts to burrowing owls/native avian species (to a level of less than significant) should be incorporated into the final CEQA document as enforceable conditions (CDFG 1995). Compliance with the MBTA and CDFG codes would be necessary prior to development, however no special permit or approval is typically required in most instances. Development activities performed outside of the avian breeding season would generally eliminate the need to conduct pre-activity nesting surveys for most common native species known from the site vicinity, and likely ensure that there were no constraints to construction relative to the MBTA/CDFG code Development of the proposed project also would remove remnant scrub potentially suitable for foraging by several other species of sensitive raptors (e.g., white-tailed kite, northern harrier, prairie falcon, ferruginous hawk) during winter or migration periods Because most potentially occurring raptor species are very widespread and roam over large areas of foraging territory, these losses would amount to a relatively small, incremental reduction of seasonal foraging habitat and occasional use areas. Accordingly, removal of remnant scrub habitats would not likely eliminate significant amounts of foraging habitat for these species, nor reduce population size below self-sustaining levels on a local or regional basis. Two federally listed species have a low potential to occur on the site: coastal California gnatcafcher and San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Because of the presence of remnant scrub/alluvial habitat and the relatively close proximity of the site to extant occurrences, resource agencies may require the performance of focused surveys to make a more definitive presence/absence determination (and therefore more fully evaluate impact significance) for Act compliance during the appropriate survey period and prior to site disturbance. Endangered or threatened species presence on the site could result in potentially significant impacts, extensive mitigation, and substantial constraints to development. • Conclusion Results of the general habitat suitability evaluation conducted in February 2008 indicate that habitats present on the ±13-acre site generally represent lower biological resource values based on the degree in which expected impacts to on-site resources would meet CEQA criteria and the context in which they occur. The site contains isolated remnants of mixed/alluvial scrub habitat of varying quality and composition potentially suitable to support several special-status species. However, most potentially occurring sensitive species associated with alluvial scrub habitats generally have a low occurrence potential because of the isolated nature of the site (no adjacent contiguous habitat present due to development that has long since fragmented habitats in the area) and the absence of hydrological and geomorphologic processes that maintain core or more characteristic alluvial habitats known from the site vicinity. Development of the site would not be expected to jeopardize the continued existence of listed species (or special-status species), substantially affect special-status resources or cause a population of sensitive plant or wildlife species to drop below self-sustaining levels, nor directly impact designated critical habitat. The site would not likely be considered essential to the conservation of listed or special- status species. As previously stated, a substantial portion of the overall site (9.87-acre northern parcel) was previously approved for development by the City. Fundamentally, after development of the northern parcel (Phase I), the remaining southern ±3-acres (Phase II) would be further isolated from any contiguous scrub habitat. As a result, the occurrence potential and/or conservation value for sensitive biological resources on the remaining ±3-acres would ostensibly be reduced. Mc Bruno Mancmelli • ~~~~ Apnl 15, 2008 Page 77 .IEaJ G & H-159 During permitting procedures, specific measures to avoid' or further reduce potential project-related impacts to sensitive biological resources may be required as part of project approval depending upon the • particular species, as well as the nature, extent, and seasonal timing of proposed construction activities. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits represent the facts, statements, and information presented herein are true and correct to fhe best of my knowledge and belief. Sincerely,. Ecological Sciences, Inc. ~~ Scott D. Cameron Principal Biologist • eQ~a„~~l/' • Mr Bruno Mananelh Apnl 15, 2008 Page 78 G & H-160 References • California Burrowing Owl Consortium. 1993. Burrowing Owl Survey Protocol and Mitigation Guidelines. April 1993. 12 pp. California Department of Fish and Game. 1995. Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. C. F. Raysbrook Interim Director. October 17, 1995. 7 pp. California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). 20D7. Computer Reports for the Cucamonga Peak, Devore, Guasti, and Fontana USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle maps. California Environmental Quality Act. 2002. CEQA Guidelines. Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors of California. ISBN #1-931362-09-02. California Native Plant Society, 2001. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (sixth edition). Rare Plant Scientifc Advisory Committee, David P. Tibor, Convening Editor. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, CA. x + 388pp. California Native Plant Society. 2003. Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, Cucamonga Peak U.S Geological Survey (USGS) quad. California Native Plant Society. 2007 CNPS Website Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California for the Cucamonga Peak USGS 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. California, State of. 1989. Fish and Game Code. Collins, J.T. 1990. Standard Common and Scientific Names (or North American Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. Third Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Lawrence, Kansas. • Ecological Sciences, Inc. 2002 Results of General Biological Assessment, ±12-acre Site, San Bernardino County, California. November 24. Garrett, K. and J. Dunn. 1981. Birds of Southern California, Status and Distribution. The Artisan Press, Los Angeles, California. 408 pp. Grinnell, J., and A. H. Miller. 1944. The Distribution of the Birds of California. In Pacific Coast Avifauna. No. 27. Cooper Ornithological Club. Berkeley, California. Hall, E.R. 1981. The Mammals o(NoRh America. John Wiley and Sons, New York (2 vol.). Hickman, James C , ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California. 1400 pp. Holland, R.F 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. California Department of Fish and Game Report. 156 pp McKernan, R.L. 1997. The Status and Known Distribution of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus). Field Surveys Conducted Between 1987 and 1996. Report prepared for the U S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Carlsbad Field Office. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and Amphibians, Second Edition. Peterson feld guide series, Houghton Mifflin Co. 336 pp. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1980. Soil Survey of San Bernardino County, Southwestern Part, California. Soil Conservation Service. • :.~. ~3~ Mr Bruno Mancmelli Apnl 15, 2008 Page 19 G & H-161 Referen ces-continued U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1996 (Feb. 28). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review • of Plant and Animal Taxa that are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Volume 61, Number 40. Federal Register 50 CFR Part 17. U S. Department of the Interior Washington, D C U.S. Department of the Interior. 1999. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review o(Plant and Animal Taxa that are Candidates or Proposed (or Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Recycled Petitions; Annual Description of Progress and Listing Actions; Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Volume 64, Number 205. 50 CFR Part 17, October 25. Zarn, M. 1974. Burrowing owl. U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management Technical Note T-N 250. Denver, Colorado. 25 pp. in California Department of Fish and Game (1995), Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. C. F. Raysbrook Interim Director. October 17, 1995. 7 pp. Zeiner, D. C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., and K. E. Mayer. 1988 California's Wildlile. Vol. 1. Amphibians and Reptiles. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Zeiner, D. C., W. F. Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayer, and M. White. 1990. California's Wildlile. Vol. Il. Birds. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. Zeiner, D. C., W. F Laudenslayer, Jr., K. E. Mayer, and M White. 199D. California's Wildlife. Vol. lll. Mammals. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. J 41r,~!WU1~ ~C1 ~~~~~ ~ Mr Bruno Mancmel0 • April 15, 2008 Page 20 G & H-162 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204. Public Review Period Closes: September 24, 2008 Project Name: Project Applicant: Mr. Bruno Mancinelli, c/o Charles Joseph Associates • • Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Open Space District in the Etiwanda Specific Plan at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 Freeway and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange - APN: 0228-01 1-38. Project Description: A request to amend Section 5.24.300 (Open Space Districts) of Chapter 5, Part II of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to add recreational vehicle and self-storage facilities as a Conditionally Permitted Use in the Open Space District and a request to construct Phase II of a master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. September 24. 2008 Date of Determination Adopted By G & H-163 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE TO ENACT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935, A REQUEST TO AMEND PART II, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.24.300 OF THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS BY ADDING SECTION .304 UNDER CONDITIONAL USES, THEREBY PERMITTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND BOAT STORAGE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, SUBJECT TO BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND ADJACENT TO THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission approved the initiation of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. 3. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga .conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. _ All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specificallyfinds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application is in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 to permit the completion of Phase I I of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land; and c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment contemplates amending Part II, Chapter 5, Section 5.24.300 of the Open Space District by adding Section .304 under Conditional Uses, thereby permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities as conditionally permitted use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 freeway interchange; and; G & H-164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 2 d. This Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor on the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in the Open Space Districtwithin the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a location that is suitable for the storage of personal property because of its immediate adjacency to the I-15 and I-210 Freeways; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will provide the necessary legislative action that will permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and storage facility in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00935. The master plan and Phase I of the recreational and vehicle storage facility was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 on April 14, 2004, by the Planning Commission at a public hearing; and f. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by conditionally permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in a location that is appropriate for this type of land use; and g. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment. \J 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use • Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the Open Space District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends that the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in the Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation • measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. G & H-165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 3 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planhing Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 .6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 by tthe adoption of this Resolution recommending approval of the attached Draft City Council Ordinance, including the conditions shown below. Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought ,against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the • construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile G & H-166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 4 construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1 108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil • during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of.year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. • 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. G & H-167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 5 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. • 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. Cultural Resources • 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: G & H-168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 6 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. • 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to • monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notifythe monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer ,to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. J G & H-169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 7 Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) • specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the fallowing measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Plan (BMPs) identified in • the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. G & H-170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 8 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits; the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm W ater Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a IevAl of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • • 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • G & H-171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-51 DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 9 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher. Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • G & H-172 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 G & H-173 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 • Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afterwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached • hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identifythe reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • G & H-174 • • • ~~ a 0 N J H Z ~"' J Y U W Z_ O Z Z Q d R O N C ~ 3 ~ i i+ m ~ W Q o a z ~ A _ ~ LL C ,~ U U ~ N m Q. a Q ~ x~`€ _ i ~,~ +~S :'~_ r ~~ . i~~*~i ~: h~ • ~~"ts V it V V ~? nfh^^. . N N N N N N ~}°t7 3~~;~ i : ~~ ~ S"~, f.=z1 ~i h e;v„R ~ ~~ ~`.r~ a$5+1 ~~,t~ ~.~~. ~~~,~, ~.~:, ~~ :~° a U a a s a ~a: F. p l~ y y N N y ~}`~ C o C a C a C a C a C n ~j. a ` ` . ~ ° o o o 0 0 0 ~.. .;,s ~ ~ 3 ~:~, '°' m . i a a i ~ i a h s [ ~ > a > > > i ` a i i a i a i a i '.~5'~ ~ ~ CC fL ~ ~ '*'-: ~~`~ E~~. U U U m U U :~- ~` ' ~~ O ~-*~ p m p O O O O ??z:` a d. d m m m 1~ ''~~^'; a O ~- ro a Uj O N T = a N C y ..~ C ~ >, [tl '= a~ ~ t/i -O p- c6 N .eau'. C C C L ... L O a O U 0= N ~ a ~ m m `0 ~ O o O ~ m ~ o ~;,a ~ N ~~ - ~ ~ a..N . rn in ~ OIL ~ U fi't` O ° ~ N O r O Q= p~ L U ~,a w' C .~ ~ N Q j N fl_ ~ a N ` L a N U ~~ U ~ p O U Y~ w N~ > to - C C i Y O T t~ ~ L ~ ?~ C C a ~ `° * E - a~ a o°nm~ U E¢ a ~ a ~ '_:~€y ~ ~ r o° ~ a~o0 me o~° moY~o ~~ acE U -U.a ~ Ea Y `~ °ro m .?"! ~ C t6 N ro U> O~ U N N ~~~ m~ 9 ~ ~ Q ' j ~ . a O ~ ~ a,°,yfi! ? N 0 _ L ~ O~ O ttl a~ O E O a ~ ~ ,xi O_ 0 a U U E ~ U O N ro to O O O C7 d t9 O j;y,:_.,. s ~ ~ _O O a 0 O D ?~ 0 0 0 O ~ N ~ U a Old 41 p a V ~ O~ ,n O O L _ ~ ~ t~ N O- (0 O N ~ ~ O ~ ~ a * M1 ~, • ;~~; ~ o a o~ ~ m m a~ N~ ~ p aim=mm°- a m`~o° ~ ro0 o~a -O waoi , ; u-~ ~4 U i c o m m E w~^3 ~ Um yU m ~ o ~ ! ~y ~ ~ N c ic O C O r .J a°. ~ ~ ~ N p N u~ ~ ~ G -O E ~ L N N L (d ~ ~ ~ ' N ~ O 7 C C .O d O) 41 N O °~ O C~ O j V "' ~ - . N:. rol, c O ...._ ` I m o o p> U U - E c E ~.,_ ~~ m~ m E o L C Q N c m o E ^x U N ~ 41 C O C C ,O J C L t4 O U g-~x E C c . > O c J ° > ~ 6 ° _ x¢'° ¢ oa i °E~° da - ia i-UE~~ oa >a ¢o.d~ ¢ c ¢¢ .~ .,, G & H-175 rn 0 a v v I N N N C' V V 7 V 7 V V III ' a a a Q Q Q a Q Q Q G G C C ro d ro O. ro d ro d C O C O C O C O C O C O C O O O O O U U ~ U U U U 3 3 3 ~ mE mE m~ mE mE mE m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ C N ~ C y ~ C f7 C y ~ C y ~ C y ~ C y N N N N J O J O J O J O J O J O J O ~ ~ ~ ~ U ^ U ~ U ~ U ~ U D U ~ U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 0 O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m d1 ~ p p C 'O J ~ U m p L - t N N~ O ~ 'O >. C N ~ ~ro -> "O O ~ O -O 9 .E 3 L .C O_ rri E ?N Nm .00-ro>, ~~ co O-~oro a to E E C U ~~ ' ° m ~ ~~ ~ E ~o ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~, s ~.4 r ro ro ~ ro m~ ~ m `m m 'roc~[C o2 m ~ a to J~ ry ro ro U U O~ L L N d O > ro O C ro O o. G - + ~ L a ~ ~ X ~ m o ~ NEE ~ ~ ~ ~ C° ~ m -% ~ ~ ~ i° C o ~ E- . o-a ~~ °i 0 CAE ~ O Uo C 'ooomJw N E o rom (6 C j~ 6 p Ol ~a N ~ T O C~~ ._ .- T(6 p d 0 O .O ~- C~ U C (0 O) 6 C N V a N ro p_ O N^ ~ ~ - E ~ N N ? U~ ~ U U 2 O ~ ro U ro~ N O y > ~ ~` m : " m `o> 'U~ E° c Y ~~ ~ U-o ~ c gy gy ro- . ° na i~~U C U U O' ` > J O ro~ ~ = ) o U to ro o = N N RS y 2 - ro E - ~ L ~ m " C ' O a o a ~ ~ o ~ m a~ >. ~~ o o m o g o a~ a~ 3 ro ' a~ >. ~ ~ `° o o °-'-a~ c ro ~UL E ~ 'o a i~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ o ~ c y ~ . u o aro ~+ ro n m 3° o ..' N J m Q w ~_ a i o_ °' m E c a NO ~~ ~'L N 2 - ~ - N ' ~ p N d > N ro N N OY O C a O~- NL ~ C~ N.- D. y-OQ C ;JO YJ - C " .-~ N U RS U O -O N L~ L U a 0 y U m ~ Tr ~ O O .C U J N ro J ~ L N ~ N a a m cn o 3 o ro o U~ H U cn 3cn ~ c~ N .~ a 1 O)~ O C N >Y J -O N > ~ 0 ~ ° ~ ~ m ° a a ~ U -tea • • N G & H-176 • L J a C Q N V 7 N N d' V 7 N N N ' a a a Q a a s Q Q Q a ~ U N h V~ lA N y y C C C C C C C c ro o. m a o ro a ro oa °c ' 0 0 0 0 m oa m a ro a o ' ` ` _ ` ~ ~ o o ~ o o o ~ ~~ '~ '~ '~ `o o `o m ~ N N N ~~ N O O N ~l/l .~y ~N N N N J ~ d N J p N N N ro C J ~ J p J ~ N N N D U Q ~ D U W Q O Q a U O U O U D U CC W Q U ~ O U U U U U U m U U U U U U O O O O O o w O O O ~ O O ~ ~] 0] 0] 0] 0] ~ U 0] 0] m a m m -oco "' c~ ~s m 'aE ~ m~ omN m-o C O ro y L O C N ro ..- C N .O C ~ C c E ~° ~~ c E d ~ E y aL w O O ¢ O ~ ai C o .- ~ ~ y ~ d ° a a O N -6 U ro C N U E O Y m ~ N m (n ~ j y C ~ N 3 ~ -6 O) J U J UI C N ~ ~ ~ C G ~ U~ N IQ ro 0 O1 d i 0 ~ CO O_ O O) y ~ O t4 J C ro ~ C p - - ' ~ L UJ C y N C C O ~ N U - ~ T C O~ y .•_. N U in ^ ~ `- ro cn d . W ' ~ N O S ~ j j ~ = ° ' ~ , N o ~ - E Q ~ L J U C ~ ~ N ~ O ~ - C ~ ~ t0 ~ G C 6 N N N ~ ~ O C ~ p 0 O L d N Q) t6 N ~. _O > O O N . f V O O a N ro O N O O U G C E O- EL-. ~a i '° -° m .~ 1 oma a . ro° °' ~~ G O i a > U T .. m_ O ro O~ o U u~ y E E L t~ omo~ U o . C N N ro d > ~ J O L O C U ro L C O D C~ N ~ N N D O > U Y U O ~ a 0 ~ d O H ~ .D '~ .- C O_ N O -p ~ ' R ~ ro O to N c ro d U U X ro~ :-' ~ ro `O p) m-_EE O-~ ~mo om °>,~ °- ~' 4 a m ~2°' c ° vc ~ - ro N - QJ L J O~ J O to ro> ro N U N U ., C N - C ~ _ C d ..: O Q J N N N U -. >i N N C~ ~ C O N m L n- O y? O C O U -O O) U R7 v ro N ro C C N N N y uI m" _ '6 t6 ~ ~ U" N O t6 E U~ N~ ~ N= 7 N O O ~ J G N O) ~t~ to N N ~ .d O_ y O O -- s a ~ ~ ~ ` t6 J N L~ ~~ N~ L ' O C 3 L O J N .~ O C U C E (p y ro ~~ J .~ Q' - J~ _ 6 J id D- U~ ro~ c O ~ ro U O f U U Cn .` C N W N W W J d > > C O W L _ O Q~ d _ U Q~ L _- UI Q~ >i ~. G & H-177 ix r~ . ~ _.: ~; :;~ i . k'na ~ S ~ , g '~yr .'S~ ~_ N ~ M M CJ (7 ~" ;~-:~ ~~~•" ~r ~~ w ~~$$ ~` ti~~` J'~ ~ '~~ - - . ~ .~ ~ ~ ~_- 9 '~~.-.fli1 ~•~-yµ~~~ 4 +^ 1." w ~y}?~~ ~' urwfdy; YY ^ ~~'n O ^ ^ O ~: U ?.~x sat.,., a a a s ~ x ~ °1 : ~s ~ ` 0 0 0 ~" c 0 ~ ~;n z 7 ~ ` ` o ` v. C ~'- o o o O ~~. ' m a~i m a3i ~ d [C w CL _ - X { ~' ~.E. ~ r~ai ~~ 9 Xi~k» [D ~ z~' U U U U "i I ~ ~i #~ .r5~' Ya F , T~~ ~ Q~, i R,.s» ~ ~ 0 ~~~ ~~+ W W W CL W •i ~ e; w~~,,~ i C m 'O ° ro D) o ~ -- `omm ~+.~ 4_~~ N= C N 0 ~ ` 'O C N N a m N '6 V O Q ~=~~' v~f a3vi ~.4 U T ~a e _ C YO _O e..~: ^,T~ " r ~ m 3. " ~ o~- m L m _ o J C to o- m r '.' e N o JO ~ o w ~~~ °2 o >, o~ cmi ro ooc m te a-:; io_ q'`a °a cc iN m` cro E E c aJU `~Y O y T m U y .` C m N =:,~ N O to E ro 3 (n d L N J N i. 1~"f, ' 'O O H O `'7 i~ U O~ O ~ J> O °~ G Ol O~ ro 'O O tD E O O "' 3 m ~ m U ~ m ro v?; :: N V J M ro J m N d ro _~~:~ G U O C 1Q a o ` m +~ ma c ' °~L a NNU > ~ .~:E~ °ro ~mT c"gym "ca c m ca ztk4F~ U m ~ J C ro U ro N _ rn C _in ~ ~~ Ol O N m j ~ U ~- ~ O ' V ~ O 0 m ~4 m e ~ ~' - m Ea it a a~op ~aEami.cU a m~ ~>emia nt ~. Som _ dM ~ ~_ m ~ > oU ~ o m-° E ° ~Nr ° °i ~' ` r J E E~ E. ~ m to m c E a ' m m~ a `o a~~ C ~;5 -~ r 0 ofv, ~ N .- C o ._ o_o L O o N ro 3 m.- o ~T ' ~ ' _ N C N ~ N m ~ ~ ~ RS > m ~ O ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ N O _ O i~:'.fi ro 0) O O) O Ol O' L '= Q c' ~ L~ W ~ E C ~~ ~ ~- J > Q C UI O) ~ ro Q1 C >>E L F F 3 ;. --r ~s~ E~o~->.- C~ Jo C L o~ D) ~m~ M~ }g. ~~ "O O O m T C m u~- : m 'O m O` ~ O m ~ 7 J +? ` C C m ~~ C O 'U ^ ~ ~ ~* U O m-- O a~ U c C~ o r._ 3s a J Y O= ~ _ O m Eo N O J C N m O ` ~w - o° L- o m~ro ~vi' 'U ~mEm ~ > E roo a L U m QOfa U~r ,~. -~ J c ~ g ~ L °'pv~ c .- - - m 3'- L ti ro J~ c Yo' H . o o m m o m ~ a roam Ea ro vim o c - J m -o °-m ~ m +n m ~ - ~~o;' ~. in ro 3~ ocm m o~mo E mJv ~ ~?roo~ 0 g .m U ono v ro~m E °c ~~F. ~ ~~ o- a m J ~- m a ro Y ~o~ ~~= E 'O - o E c o o N o .~ vi ~~~ ~^ .' N~ ~ L U ~ W L N ~ ~ E C ;~,, ~ d m O L _ ... N - p a 0 ro 0 y 0 O C ~ erm a W . C ° . ~ J a .... N ~ U O m a 0 O ~ - J m - O Y y y N - - T~ O O E N E - ( i m O ro N > y L C ~ p 0 ro> _` ~ O~ L O O/i +~"0:4 N O) !-' C T~OI C ro 0 0 T m .~ - L m~ p a O) ~ i !; J ' . .. N C 7 m 0 ~C ~ ~ U ~ W [n ~ m a > U C 'O Y W m W U O a 0) y I O' I y U 0 p m O ~ O' . .; ~. ; > L m ' ro ti , J J p ro U _ ' 1 ~ 4 c U ` ' =ai:S =-o Na° SnQ ° mE° '2U,, -ro° maro • • V • G & H-178 • .~ C7 V V V M 7 ' ° ° a a a a o a ` r 0 0 0 0 0 0 a n n n a n E E E E m E `o `o `o `o `0 0 3 ~ 3 3 ~ 3 a i i a a i a i a i i a m m m o o m ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ CC ~ U U m m m ^ D O o ~ O o D a ~ a m ~ ~ ~ a ~ L >.~ C m m o y o c o~ m O a a i m a m m- p ~ 0 0 ~ o m L O D .-- L C ~- N N L C L ~ noU E `° c E N o na>E o° ~ m~ ° ' ~ ~ m `m -° N c ~ ~ ~U - m . n Em O .`°~' o `°°~ m~. m o a-°o] omO ca~ m m Emmm. ^NE c p oNm ~m~.N.~~ me E.a roo m~~ m n._~ C C N >i n~ O' ~ O .~ L~~ ~ m O O m L Ol ~~ 0 0 0 E O ~ (n (~ d C m~ m ~ ~ m°o a~ao ~ -- > ~ > ~ E~ m~ U m~ - N m c E ~o c m o r : o oEo c N_ c - ~ oa m N o m °~U ~. o ro a~"a O p c E E m ~ ~ ° m ro o - - w Z'"c: o c ~~o~°c m U°~nm~m~EE~ aro O oE :ErLE °'m>, omm cn oma~o~_°-°- ~o~YN~m~o~ ~~m~ ~~o~LO« mEo ~o m'- E N oo._ o.°~oE,~oom-O oso^ ~~Eo '= ` aa i°o ~~~ m a~ ° ~-° E ~.v o o- " ° o ~ o ° _ ~r o m c o o O C c o C ~ j° . L .-. vi m C G I N `O a N N d O ~> ~ a~ n~ a >,.C E E~ ~ m O N U _ >~ N m~ to N O~ m' m m y N N ~ C m N = ~ U ~. •- = j ~ EnL n cc C C O C ' C O m O ~-- ' m ~ SEE~o~ ° °'~o, Evi m m m~ O .- ° m ° .- N a 7 ~p,o ~ o ° .. N -o~nc '- m~ m o aci aai c = o °~ ~ m o °'__ o a L ~ - a c o~ o c_ REoc~'6~'> ~°'3° aEapiy°~caE cnm ~ ~~ LC D` En>' ` "' E°~ ncncvSLL - nm~~`o~~a~t6o~a m .aaEc ~ ~ - o~ . ~ 3o~N ~ o a~mc Em>,m o N U O N~ ~ p O ''~- ` ~ U O C O n g .- N O p m : m O C "C m D-'- O O Q1 U m C L N O O U J O C O S] U a t O >> a_a am o¢ m ` T c.N m u, m-~~ ~ ° n~ ¢ o Ea cn o` ~- mp as mU O cnU U~ m N> c a m o m n° _o m n ' o L n -° a U a N w E m r rn O G & H-179 m " ' , kt . _~ ~,f '~ ~-' ~_ -r;. ~~: 4~_". l~F 5 ~ .-~ : • ti'~ } ~:. 7 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ N % k ; V V V ~ ~~4 ~` ~' ~~•' ~i $S q '._ ~~~ ~:~. K ~^+ ~ yam: L ~'~ ...2a~n S'v~ ' y Xi. A~rC~ ] J!^!!I ~~{~L ~ ~~rr[[t ~+?~ ~ J~T.ilF 3s^ N,a~,T. ,.^TyY µ~ -~ U t'~%: Q Q Q Q ~~ r a ~~ ~µ d-~`"I ry~~"' O O O O niunh O_ ~`~ ~dd a S~{ U O) .. . C N U O) ~, .C N U m ~ C y U erg' O) ~ ».< W. C y ~4u„.=r O ~ ~}+. = C O J C O ? C O J C ~~- O ~~ ~ Q Q O Q 'x~~~e ~ F ~4 ~ 4 , ; ~ rv •: ~ p 4i ~aFF G q ~LL ^i ~ , U U U U U ~ ro E~"' ~~~' rr.~- tom, . tga - w r " O O O O O ,~ m m m m m-~ m Eqt»`~"'.. ~aoL m ~-o am aco 7 cE>.~mo ~"' ~ s c0 C ~ O~~ N C O N ~ L;y3'v°. cC `O R L '~ ~ 1~~, 3 4J . U ~ ^a'~ C ~ a C 41 O ._ ~ ;'~a. ~ E U m `° ~ ~. . `off ° -o ° o E r~~ w md.m >' m ~ b;~y,..: "" U ° _. ? d 11 ,T;,:u~ ~q ~ a ~ m ~ q d ~ ~ U7 N ~ c/,^ni 'p N Q n ;( ~~ ~ .~ ~ O N O 0) m N L IU6 L ar,?, o ,- ~ 'U O L- ` "~~' L _ man. T C 3 m ~ n.- ui m r s a c ~t m' m 4' O U m m y ~m ; 6 arY " ' ~~ ~~ ~ m a N U ~ c E y c a : t o :, .~ _ ° m a c J - + = ~m m m Etc o .- ~ ~ ~ ~° ^x;~`' .. a ~' o m N C a UI °am> N N T "'Em NnSc " _ - O~ O [.;m m °iCmm? Ol > ,, ~, . ~N4 O ~ m` O ~ N E m ~ O a, C m K-mom 65 ~ C O m r O 'j m §, O._ Q ' t6 O U . m U U ~ O N , (6 L O ~~ a ~ ~ T ~ m p~ U C J ~ N a O t0 O a m E ~ - t6 ~ O .,:'0- U ... C N C O O ` 'v a. L O). - 0 m C N~ C . 9 ° m t6 E~ N N O ~O L o _C:_ OJ N (0 c6 Q] m c E N .N a U c6 n m m H C O X 'y m m ~ ~>,i m_ O O o 0 ~'C>~ ND m Q N N C ~ ° N °~ _ NO~Ld f:~01% .'O ° .NLd m0 U ~X 4 ~ ~Oi m N U~ RS u,0 R a m~ 0 ~ L a ; U N . EO E= + ` N O N ~- E . y~o~ ' 'm rn o-~~ 'm ~ c°mN oL' `m o m°E ro~- o~oa a -y - omm~mcm , .- ~C7~ _ L o m f m~ >i ~ o E~ m LL m N O T n o C3 m~ L m U CC (L ~ '_-. L L o d m> .`~_ m U L • O • • G & H-180 C~ • N N N N N N ' a a a a a s N C N C y C N C N C y C m ro Rs as m m °- a H o. a o. o `o `o o `o `o ~ 3 3 3 3 3 ~ m ~ m o m m ~ o ~a~ ~o m ~m ~ ~ CC ¢ ~ CC ~_ ~ ~ O ~ ^ U U U U U U m m m m ro m m m m U m m .S ~ o a o s °' ° ~~~~ E ~ c m S a o ~ ~ a~ °' o o m o o m o m U N N d ~ C ~ - C .- L ,^ C a n o ~ ~~ ~ '~ m y m N 0 3 p L~ C ul h a ~ ` ~ O C N O U`° y y t4 C ~ .T N 0o J~ n~ O n U a~N~~n ono N L cow j a c E c O mmo N T ~ a Um C O ` C E~>. - X C O~ C O 3 C N - C Y m ~ ° ' N J mo oc o o E o m ao,o E co UJ m _ ~ ~~ a L~- .oroEUa~ E a ~N ~E~~ ~~JOy ° Q3 3 o >~ i a ~ °LL n ~ m~- ~ a i N - a >. °- n o ~ o c i oa c n° ~ L m y (n ~ 3L- U1 N ~ J d N o N L d C O Oi L ~' a °~ d~ ~ `4° ' c n °° ~ ~ ~E N m a o ~°' o > _ m a o N °-° EEs ~ Esa,.4 ` E oo m a- ? ~ ~ m~ E 20] N U O a ~C J C ~O y C0 N in O O O O~ L C n~ E ~ U ~ J O N O N L E : ° E o~ ~ ~ °' 0 c ~ E a° c ~ c N - a ~' ~ i ~ c ~ a 2E a i $ i a a o id a N o ~ E o N n~°= o ;c C C C C `° a E E m E ` a s <n E ~ d~ N ~ - E a c m o~ .E w o.EU E 4 ~.m m m° E _ °'Ya o °'» _ °-''"~°o ~' m ~ ~ .~.~ m o~ Es o c ~-o N~ E c~ ~ U E m~ E'^ ~ ~.- ° -- E~ o o aaciON~ ~ E 3 `n E9 ~ m mm a acm m.o Ec L_a>o - a _ a m ~ ~ m ~ ~ Sy =°-_'~now ot9 v`,°'a°~m.E °O-°'y~ ~ o~mo ~~f6 ~ ~ ~ c ~nE 'o ~`°> _ c ~~ mw °~ o am ~`oL-p ~ ~ ~ n3 m r w ~-~ m - - m a~a ° ~ ~,o C~ a '~ J U X N m 0 ~ m L N J O D) ` ` N d C G (tl Q C ~ N C ~- °d-O-~?~ aocc~a= ~s w .n o m ~d~mo L ~m ro 3a U U s c°' ~`tl~' C w~ O N U tO ° 'N~a Y _ O o°O v~ __ L ° o N 0] X o"m~om `~ ~ O a °' ~ m `° ~ E oa._ m o~ ° O o~_ m-- ~ a ~n O U~ m u i 0 3 °:o m E o~ E o a o_ mp o a i a oa a~ c C~ ~ N~ 0) -O m °- m O~ m -_ m~~ ' ~L m y J N ~ U ~ C ` C m m J m V~ , ~ U .._. C U m. ~ n U c-o ~ m c 0) m ~ c~ ~ C O).. '" m ` U O) a'.: m¢ E .S N o ~ o m E 3._ N w a o O p m- T ° m C L L L C y~ c c N m ro ro a n~ ~ -O _ C Y E N o ~ ~C .~ E C C N ¢ ~ a o -o m ° C U S ~ ° .~ `o `9 ¢ n o m -o ~? J O ~ ~ `m a F d ~ m ° E a ~ ° ~ a c ~ E ~-a . . a i rn O r G &' H-181 ~~-~;, ~_ _,~:. 33_v~ ~t ~_}.~}.~ ~'Ny~i ~ i! ~ ~ ~3c ~°~:~ a a `w.~, ~~~: L _.: r~` ~' ~~ ~..:.~: ha+~~ a a a ~~:~ <~=~, N t0 N N a F. ~s~ •~~.? U- C C n 0 0 :~x'.~-1 ~ in ~ in ~ CC rr~ `u~'i?S?F~'i~ O U 4 U ~~~`Y f ~~ ~ ' . t U U W. ':~L_m':1"_ =~' ~' ' ' m m ~~ *~ ? U U ~; ~°a:« ~ ~ r ~~ ~i ~ U m ~ m m ro a t0 E O N 3 0 O T C t6 ry C y T (6 u ~ N ~j (6 N C N T~ >. C C N >• N a N r=n~5°h-'Z.- E~c`9~mUc ?~ ct°o a'~r °'oE=~L~°On°~o Oa N ` U _ m o- o~i N m m a~ ~.~=,: °s T m m ma c 3 °- N 3 `0 ~ N > N>~ O L U~ C7 N N L~~ E .zs ~~ O U N C , a i ~ E C O N~ N~> L S] ~~m..m~ o ~LOfo~ V "-~-'~` m3~ ~ _ Ea~._o~.c~~a~o O.O mO.U O NL O.- C~~ ~~ O ~ 2!~`_-.V~} ~' L J O C (n p O.LT ~ O N'O "Oaa= t4 ~ d ~ N- '~,.~ U C C a O~ V N a a d Q O W O ~ 0.. ~ z m a ~ L N ~_ Z S._r%-. r'C ~*' t6 O C O C U N - n O ~ t0 L ~ i6 N n C O (n m U E x N 3 O~~ ,.~ N~ O > C Z Z E '- ~ E° O_ L C~ O ~ a pKi ~~ N N c Ja a-°-5 ~ mC7 m m° `.oo ~~ o-~ o ~ o~ J na~~<~. ~ mEa~ ~ m Nmo. N E ._a a~a~ ~ °~~ ~ w ~ ~n.._ U E c°aaxi3d~oo o`o EE-°'om°~ =~~ o°~ o~ °' moo~o~wa~~_ N O S U L N N d s L J a '<'^ ~ , C ~_ ~ a ~ N 7 n'C O L- C N n O) O~~ J N~ O C C >. a, W O~ ~'~? o U ~;3, O N f? ~ a CO N~ ~ O N~ N O O ° ' _ G c a~.E ° 3 °'~ a~-o ~ ~° ctlZ o ` '` ~ w~ m ° °' U m a N o y ~ ° c 'm ~ m i m ~ m 2` ~ °i m m c m - -~f m m O m-~ ~ m° 'E ~ w co - 2 0 _ J C N O a' N >' C N L W A t9 O>> O O O O C ro> ~] U~ V .i a:.T~ C ~~ C f6 =0 a O C ~ p7 O N O N ' C ~ N o > -- ~ ~~ ~ E o E E ~ o '';' ^° `° o ~ `° a~ E O N p a N <6 s,'° . "_ °' ° ° ' .~ Y c o ~ m N o N C ~ o , a~ U o J U E OJ ~ 's..,.., . ` 5 - m a m ~~ N y ~ ~ - ~ c~ ~> "" UU. eo;oemE ° o ° O e c _z~a i °iw U O ~ ' ~ f.~ e ;~u~.; ;>; T ooJro o opm n C (6 (4 ~ O N C f>.m m m L ~~ o O o E ro m o J L n a E m° aci ~ a ~ m N L ' p U ~: O := O , R .+~~'',' O~ C%7 ~ O N W L c N- °- a~ L~ °''" ... vJ t6 QJ ~ L ~ o mN N m ~ EU C , N t4 ._ N m m~~ ° mU v C V 3,fc, ;:.~~,.~ . ~ _ O ~_ mL O ~o-NON N N C 'r ~ > ~~~ ° ti N._ m._ m ~ -O a 'O G 'O .- C 3 T d O O N W J O O .D ~ ~ ~ U 0) ~ N N J C "Ffg ~ ~ ` C ~ ~ ~ ctl ~ J ~ U_ t0 O Q J c6 ~ i0 L N .E a L C~ N N U O C- ~? L y O ma y '+~`=.N"• C y it a O in a N N ~ N O N_ O a p~ a a _~ ~ O =_ td U' O N t4 ~ n~ N O O K N J O ~T'O'~"_ O p U t0 O O O N O O N L~ cp N td C O d N S >i ~> E o n d m >i ~ U W O E 07 U ~.Zn- U L C C U fb ~ a C UD N N N 'C y G N • • G & H-182 • C v c 0 U D1 C N ~ C O ~ U O m a a o j s N m :o m a N Y >. ~ S] O m ~ ~~~ O~ d C N O to C ~ 0 3~ y N .- C O ~ O -O ~ O ~ O ~ U C ~ ~ td O T ~- O N = c aE~ma _ `6'" 3 c Y `° Er~ O u, ° ~ a ~ L ~ O ~ ~ ~ T >. C O N ~'' O O C O N O N (6 C l0 Cp 0 C ..~. O` L N R ` O ~ d N p ~ -O ~ N In 'O N ` E L O O a~ ~: ¢ m O_N Oin a~ c N.V 0 '^ - y 0 ~ T O C o c~ o O O z m- y ~ N O ~ '6 -O .- ~ 'O ~~~ O O v ~ O h CO ~ L O C N O) p - N~ N > o c c ~ ~- ~ ° ~ ~ a = c ~ - ~ -o °- ~ m m c S L C C L t6 d OU r y N C O .~ .; Ol Q N Y U Ol t U O T d Y m O m G & H-183 • ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935, A REQUEST TO AMEND PART II, CHAPTER 5, SECTION 5.24.300 OF THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS BY ADDING SECTION .304 UNDER CONDITIONAL USES, THEREBY PERMITTING RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND BOAT STORAGE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE, SUBJECT TO BEING LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ETIWANDA AND SAN SEVAINE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND ADJACENT TO THE TO THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 12, 2008, the Planning Commission approved the initiation of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. • 3. On September 24, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 08-51 recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2007-00935. 4. On 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby speafically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application is in conjunction with a Conditional Use Permit application DRC2008-00204 to permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage facility on 3.60 acres of land; G & H-184 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ,2008 Page 2 c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment contemplates amending Part II, Chapter 5, Section 5.24.300 of the Open Space District by adding Section .304 under Conditional Uses, thereby permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities as conditionally permitted use, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 freeway interchange; and d. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor on the surrounding properties; conversely, the amendment will allow for recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in the Open Space District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a location that is suitable for the storage of personal property because of its immediate adjacency to the I-15 and I-210 Freeways; and e. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will provide the necessary legislative action that will permit the completion of Phase II of amaster-planned recreational vehicle and storage facility in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00935. The master plan and Phase I of the recreational and vehicle was previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 on April 14, 2004, by the Planning Commission at a public hearing; and • f. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by conditionally permitting recreational vehicle and boat storage and self-storage facilities in a location that is appropriate for this type of land use; and g. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not have a significant impact • on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code, and; c. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Etiwanda Specific Plan • Text Amendment will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: G & H-185 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 2008 • Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation .Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935, thereby amending Part II of Chapter 5, Section 5.24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS, as listed below and including the conditions shown below: Addition of the following bold text to Part II of Chapter 5, SECTION 5.24 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS: .304 Conditional Uses: Recreational Vehicle and Boat Storage and Self-Storage Facilities, subject to being located on the east side of the Etiwanda and San Sevaine Flood Control Channel and adjacent to the eastbound I-210 and I-15 Freeway Interchange. Planning Deoartment 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any • Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his .obligations under this condition. G & H-186 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 2008 Page 4 • Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. T.he contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD • Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during, high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. G & H-187 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ,2008 • Page 5 • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. • 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate • thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. G & H-188 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ,2008 Page 6 • Biological Resources 1) If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete'a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With.the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an' opportunity for the City, to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation • measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: G & H-189 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ,2008 • Page 7 • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved • by SCAOMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) -Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods G & H-190 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES 2008 Page 8 experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Plan (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. • 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and • stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management .Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. G & H-191 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08- DRC2007-00935 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES ,2008 • Page 9 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall'be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or hafted. 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Cucamonga, California. • in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper California, and circulated in the City of Rancho G & H-192 • RESOLUTION NO. OS-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE II OF A MASTER-PLANNED RECREATIONAL VECHICLE AND SELF-STORAGE FACILITY ON 3.6 ACRES OF LAND IN THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHW EST CORNER OF THE EASTBOUND I-210 AND SOUTHBOUND I-15 FREEWAY INTERCHANGE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0228-011-38. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted aduly-noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 24th, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 3.6-acre vacant property located at the southwest corner of the eastbound I-210 and southbound I-15 Freeway interchange. Access to the recreational vehicle and self-storage facility will be from an access and maintenance road off Victoria Street; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is Phase I of the master-planned recreational vehicle and self-storage project, previously approved under Conditional Use Permit DRC2003-00048 on April 14, 2004, by the Planning Commission at a public hearing; and c. The properties to the south and east consist of the I-15 Freeway; to the west is the Etiwanda Creek/Sevaine Drain Channel and the Victoria Street Retention Basin; and to the north is Phase I of the master-planned recreational facility and the I-210 and I-15 Freeway interchange. Therefore, the project site is physically suitable for a recreational storage and personal storage facility and will not negatively impact adjacent uses; and • d. The project will provide for off-site storage of personal property in a secure environment in a location that is suitable for storage facilities; and G & H-193 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 2 e. The project site is physically suitable for aself-storage facility because of its immediate adjacency to the I-210 and I-15 Freeways along the east and south property lines, and the Etiwanda CreeWSan Sevaine Drainage along the west property lines. Given the immediate proximity of the site to the I- 15and I-210 Freeways and exposure to high noise levels that preclude the development of other land uses, the location is logical choice for self-storage; and f. The self-storage facility will be compatible with surrounding area, and will not create any nuisance impacts on the surrounding area because of its location being surrounding by physical features (I-15 and I-210 Freeways and drainage channel) from the built environment that will function as buffers. Further, a photometric study has been completed in order to demonstrate that illumination will be confined within the project site at or below the allowable foot candle requirements; and g. The architecture of the proposed storage facility will match the architecture of Phase I, thereby, creating a unified and cohesive design, a goal of the General Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to • the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these • findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. G & H-194 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 3 c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 .6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 is granted contingent upon approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 by the City Council, 30 days after the Second Reading. • 2) The project will be developed and plan checked in accordance with plans on-file in the Planning Department as approved by the Design Review Committee on August 19, 2008. 3) A detailed sign program shall be submitted and reviewed by the Design Review Committee. Wall signs shall comply with the standards of the Sign Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Title 14). 4) All exterior light fixtures, including wall pack lighting, shall have glare shields. The quantity and placement of wall pack lighting shall be designed to result in the least amount of necessary lighting fixtures. 5) All retaining walls visible to public view shall be split-face block. 6) All perimeter, on-site and street frontage landscaping shall be completed prior to occupancy being granted. 7) Should all storage buildings not be constructed concurrently, all remaining storage building pads shall include hydro-seed, interior landscaping, and perimeter landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Engineering Department 1) Any Caltrans and/or San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) • approvals that are required shall be obtained prior to the issuance of building permits. G & H-195 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 4 • 2) The project proposes to use channel facilities and/or easements and existing access bridges of the SBCFCD. The developer shall obtain and provide the City with written approval and conditions of approval from the SBCFCD prior to obtaining building permits. Provide documented proof of right of primary and secondary access as well as substantiating physical improvements over the proposed access points. 3) Victoria Street shall be widened to provide full street improvements on the north side from the school district property line to the Caltrans right-of-way, including curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street pavement in accordance with City "Collector" street standards. 4) Provide streetlights on Victoria Street as required. a) The drive approach on Victoria Street shall be per City Standard No. 101, Type-C, minimum 35 feet wide and comply with City Policy. b) The curb and drive approach on Victoria shall be placed at the ultimate curb alignment of 22 feet from the centerline of the street. Drive isle access entrance to Victoria Street shall intersect at a right angle. Line-of-sight study shall be provided. c) Provide R-26(s) "NO STOPPING" signs. • 5) Victoria Street access to include a paved roadway, 26-foot minimum width and meeting minimum Fire Department turning radius requirements, from the Victoria Street entrance to the RV storage facilities. a) Provide roadway and turn-around between Victoria Street and the storage facility to accommodate Fire vehicles and equipment. b) Provide adequate lighting. 6) In the project area designated "Phase II" (DRC2008-00204), complete all rough grading and drainage with Phase I. 7) If the Flood Control District agrees to maintain frontage landscaping, the developer shall provide street trees, landscaping, and an irrigation system along the Flood Control Victoria Street frontage. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction. equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. G & H-196 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 5 2) _ Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1 108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD . Rule 403. Water all active construction areas three times daily. 7) Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. 8) Reduce speed on unpaved roads to less than 15 mph. G & H-197 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 - ' DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 6 • 9) Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. 10) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW OCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. 11) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 12) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 13) Suspend use of heavy construction equipment during first stage smog alerts. 14) Encourage use of "clean diesel" equipment if modified engines (catalyst equipped or newer Moyer Program retrofit) are available at reasonable cost. 15) Encourage car pooling for construction workers. 16) Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. 17) Park construction vehicles off travel roadways. • 18) Wash or sweep access points daily. 19) Encourage receipt of materials during non-peak traffic hours. 20) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring thattrucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 21) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 22) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. .Biological Resources 1) If site preparation activities are scheduled to occur during February 1 to August 31, apre-construction survey Burrowing Owl/nesting avian survey by a biologist shall be completed a minimum of 30 days prior to construction. Should eggs or fledglings be discovered in any owl burrow or native nest, these resources cannot be disturbed until the young have hatched and fledged. A biologist shall complete a report containing recommendations on whether passive relocation or avoidance is preferred. The applicant shall adhere to all • mitigation measures in the biologist's report and all requirements of the MBTA and CDFG code. G & H-198 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 7 Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e.. paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of • the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). G & H-199 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 8 Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. • Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the • Building Official forapproval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • G & H-200 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 • Page 9 5) The developer shall implement the Best Management Plan (BMPs) identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Lockman and Associates (June 2008) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Parking lots shall be swept quarterly. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. • 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured atthe property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. • 3) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the G & H-201 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. OS-50 DRC2008-00204 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 24, 2008 Page 10 developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission • held on the 24th day September 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • G & H-202 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) forthe above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessaryto ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency • Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 G & H-203 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT DRC2007-00935 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 . Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed bythe protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring afferwritten notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. G & H-204 • ~~ f"~ a r L~ r N J H Z v '~ VJ J • Y U W U Z_ O Z Z Q L` .~. l0 0 i ~ 3 ~ 3 /~~ T Y •.. V W ~ d ~ R Q d o a` Z N ~' a LL C ~ U U ~_ Q) IC Q a ¢ ~ es~~ S`:~5~~ i y ~ C ~ ~ ~$' t "~! 'y~ u ' V N N V N N ~ N V N } " I •*k ~ ~~~ ti s?:3+ Y ~: ~ k, =# `~ ~~. ~'~ a U U U U U a a s a ~,~, ~T 4I C l~ C N C N C y C y C eg3~.k N RS c0 N f0 i6 ~"=~ a a o. oa a ` a `0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ ~'"N d o 0 0 ~ m ~~'gp3 ~~~y ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ `rst~ y~F~' St 4 . " ice, ~~ '~3 a:; N ~;'~ U U U m U U a~~ ~ ~' ~ m ~x ° ° ° ° ° ° ~; m m m ,~a~ c ~ t° U U o z c ¢ ° ~ . ~ « ~ a ~ « o a ~ u m i n ~ _ =o ~ n m c u `~ ~ U ~~ - J O N U O o ~ O .- oQ= t9o O L Q~ O N .~ L . - 3 'C) N~ T N ~ C U C ' p C C` Y O~ O tp Ol c9 c6 = N~ C ~ ~ C C O gy ~ O N~_ > - O C C Q O O~ O~ N O ~~ E a 0 n p U ~^r- ~%'~~ o n~ m ~ °1 ~ ° c b o9 ~ U ~ a ~ m ° s w ° E¢ U ~ ~ ?~ E m « ~ L o ';'xyt~4 4 ~~ U L C L N C O N~ 9 c °i U ° V1 D U~ to a > O y y_ .~'.Y ~.~ C (` N ~ N > N O '' E > U « (n O OU -O U N N O N i E- "' O) ~ _ ~ C t0 7 ~ ~ C Q j N O OU >i -O ~ C . . T N N .O ~ ° `° 0 0 m ~ t6 ~ o ~ m Q, o o. o. o o ~= 'O 0 0 0 y - o m a i a ~ o ° °>' ,_# .. o :o L ~~ o o ' N n a m p p t~ - - a m r 3 E~ d 3 ~ O o N , ~ ~ • C C F O t~ O ~ C L C N O S ~ C L 5 ~ ~ t ': ' O G O C N rLil L~ >i -O N E C ttl O O N y ¢ U ~ t6 O ~ t~ ~ ~! . ~~~'t ` y 0 "O C O ... N .J O) « N O Uf C C .J O to w C~ E ~ L N N 14 L D> q ~ ~F C N C U C U C e °- 2 ~m a~ 2 ~ O Q O~ N U N N -~ N O) ~ E c E ~°~ m e~ S C ~ ? o m E L C Q~- N ~ '_' e o ~ o E r ~ o R U 0 ~ n° nw N ro c ~ no ya o ~ ~ N 7 ~L ~~, U O C C _ O j~ 0~ O N C C L N N U ~d ~d - n E O O N (6 i0 N N Q> Q> O - N t6 m - O -~ U Qs ~ ¢ o m o E~ o a~ a a~ a> o S U E~ d ¢ na L ¢ c ¢ Q .C w G & H-205 D7 0 T N N N V C' V 7 V ~ ~ ~ ' a a a Q ~ Q Q Q Q a a O. d d d C O C O ~ _ C O C O C O C O O 3 O 3 O 3 O 3 U m2 U 0~~ U m~ U ~2 U m2 U m2 U m~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C y C y C UI C y C y C y C~ Q ~ ~ ~ p U p U p U p o p U p U p U U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m ~ ~ C L ' O L L A N-> O Q 'O L v 3 vi - E ` ~m min ~°-ro>. ~U: o p^o_ ~' .Q o o, o m rocLO Sm ° ` ~m~`~~ ~ ~ Y o ~ o E ~ io ~ ro o ` 3 ~° o s o o O~'~ - m o ~ :o ~ `° ~ E -° ~ c i o ° `° ._ E m ~ i a ro - ~ `m U ~ aEi is 16 ~ in ro - '° ~ N .~ ro C ro - -O ~ '~= N O _ U L o > ro (n CC o> O N 4J L ~ ~ . N N L ~ N h ~ h O O N C N Ol S] > ~ ~ - .N 7 a C N ro N U U C ro O C . m C y N O ~ L L ro a 0 >+ " -ro0 O C o y-O ~ E ~ > C m N O o o. JL -p O- N ~ O ~- a 3 m ~ O_ ~ a~~ . c i ~ N ro `° E L ~ a~a m ~ >~. ~ =~ ~~ E -O axia °' °_o i : ~~n°i ~ N °o C aoomom ~ N N E .- o ~~ ro t6 C j~ ag - p ~ O).~ C o O m o- >. ~ vro O. C ~ p~ ` -o ~ E ° o N O N j U c ~ U U Q on N .C ~ N °- roao ~ ro U ~ > - ~ ~ N a° O° m N O O v ~ O to O `° d' O 0 0 ° ~ N 0 0 0 >> O ` ° ~ ` d O O °-o o c = m ~ Ns ~ rm ~-_o~ o~~v E o ° a~ c m~ -U~ ~ °' m ~ ~ > m° ~> 3 d m`~Nro am°-' c ~ m0mu~~ rom 3 c ~ro ` C to U U Vi ro _ ° m "_ N> ro h O O ro - ro_ Q. ,= N C O L O O. 16 N O. O U~ ~ .T ro (0 O Ol N p ro Y E L m~ C i ro N N m ro O) O j~ N N d ro N O U Ol E j ~ d~ G I N N N > ro LL N C > 0 Q d N ro O d 3 0 N y N O O Q °~ C O L O~ ti O. N~ -O C- ro - U . N L ro U C U ° y O a N.y Q _ ro y N d ~ ro' UJ N ~ p ro d (n 2] ~ F °V (n >i fn ~ L y N ~ N O in ~ y-. a ~ L r O O U C y N° N a N O L ~ 2 F- d. CC U N u G & H-206 • • a V V N V d' N N 7 O V N (~ N ' Q a a Q a a s Q Q Q a U t~ y y y y y N C N Q (6 a C t6 d td d °~ C C C C (9 d td Q (D p- O O C O O O O .U O O U O O O j U U U U O O O m2 3 3 m2 3 3 3~? m2 m2 m2 3 3 ~ C y N 4l C y N U N t~ U .C N .C y C h .N N d J ~ N N J ~ N N N N E J ~ J ~ J ~ N N N O o ¢ ¢ O o ¢ ¢ ¢ o. o ~ 0 0 0 ~ o ¢ ¢ ¢ U' 0 ~ U U U U U U [0 U U U U U U O O O O O o W O O O o O O m m m m m n- U m m m a m m 'O C O C~ m Y m D E U U U N 0) ~j O -O C O t6 :.- N y N L O .y C ~ t6 :~ '~ ~ C N Ol O) L C d a G N p ~~ O N U~ ttl ~ O O .'~ U O N ~~ Itl U ~~ E ° o °'L ~ E~ N m o° ti dL ~ o O ` ~ vI C ~ ~ >` d U N O Uo om N coJ E ~~ Y h -o m -o m°~ C a~- cn ~ j ~~ °' E c °- o 0 3 0 ~ o ~ m ~ ~~ 3 3 = C _ O Q E~ y N t6 C N C U C C U p >. : d U t N ~- - m~ O N d ~ O ~ C O d O D) U a .-:. ` N t6 J C ,D C = C L W C C ~ 3 U U N ~ T ~ ~ .... N M= t~ N O_ - U C ~ t6 ~ ~ ~ C t6 p m E 'p L ~ ~ C cU N O J U ` tq O O O t6 t6 ~- d .- to Q U C C N N .O (~ O O O C O p 0 N Od L N N L ~ ~ . C _ m ~ m ~ °-'' ~a~ ~ c E ° ~ a°' o ° i a a m ~ o E p E p ~Q~~ mop, °Qa >~ ~~m m ° ~ ~ E ELF a`°°' °ia N ro C ~ O) ~ ~~ U N ,C O U O N - d ' O .N D N C O 3 G C S ~ O N ; U O Vi U Y U O p D d fYU D 'Ip h G Q N ~ -O Q L~ O y (4 d N C t6 d S U N ~ O +- ~ ~O ~ w-EE O-p ~m om o>.c ~ o d ~ cY ~~ Cc =moo -mL oJ3 Em5 ° E ~m> m N a o o p a~ c '° _ m_o ~ m.-d oL _o ~ ~ 2 .~ - cL ~ ~ N w Jmm U U 3 ~ m - m ~ o ~ & c o ~~ _ _ ~ ~ N C y ? C .~ = .- J N - ~~ ~ ~ ~ N U C N ~ y _ `-' U ._ N ~ O N ii! O RS m L a " U O U 3 " U 01 c tC m c0 C o `o [6 l m c 'O o : 'D m ~~U a~ omE E ~ ~ m J rn - ~np > No E Q (~ U U C a N d N C .` O O .. O y O - 0 QI . C N ?L-' L~ ~ • ~ p~ J ~ . C~~ C . E Y (D W ~ C -~ ~ -~ -~ N ~ U¢ cb ~ L Q F t0 d L H U U (n ~ W N .. W J d > > O W L N Q d N Q L Q >i O G & H-207 ~'~fi ~ ~Ct=: ~ '~ ~'<~ ~f " = ~p ~*~ut i ~ tR~ ~ g y,. „ ji~'i ? i C' L~~**n. V V V 7 ai E~dAYi ~~a ~~ €~ +~ ~j ~~ °~~~ ~ ~~~~ «~_ U ups a a a a fir, l;~;~.a ._ t r •- S ~ a ~ ~-~ o_ ~ a ~ a ~ a N ~\~ ` f ~ ~~ ' (~ (} O O O O ~ ~ 4' O ~ _ ~~ ~~u ; 5.v, a s~ ~f s ~'" ~ „ ~ y ~~ !~ =~ f?~:2T. m U U U U ~~Y" ~~'°' "~ O O O O ~'~ I ~`~ m m m m >-=, ~h~ t ~t'u? k #,;ti'~ _ - ~5'< C [6 -O 0) J O O p O~ C O N t6 °4 -`~ N= C p N ~ 3 p Y -O C «N, ~ O .- N 3 [6 y N L ~6 U dl ¢ C p J U+ „S aaG~:` S' l , U ~~, U U >` d N G O) C C YO -O °~ ~ U V w .. a (6 ~ L 6 C ~ y O O '~ W ~ ~ .~~, o`~N>ma.roooc N ~ ~oo=_ cpN m c_ N E cU a J - - - m tr~~,~x :. :: c> °UO'oo ~'~_:, oaU -0 0 o c = a+ >> o°-c~ mom o.~- m ~ o ~~ . p - m o_~ : ~ o a' 0 0 o c a c E m J _ N m m ~o ' i°Eo ~~~ -JO°'NO~O~o aNia ioN nE .. ` ~° ya i~ -om Wr°1"j ',~ N O- C ~~ L d> N N U :,-'3.£ Eg po. L L... N N t0 ~omU U (6 a~~ C ~N O o 'g l4 C C O_ yam ~ 'f.`ry g .-_^.~: y > O) v~ (6 N C LL _ t6 ~ O O . U N (0 O J 4 , ` E m ~ E (0 U C o - t o. to C OI a~ ~ ~ c ~~ m m o_~ o o U ~°' ma o a~.. O o~ ELL __mY o o may Y ~.~ o_~ E3 s~ ~> _._ m L t0 C ,ice ro~ p L ~ N ' ~~ O ~ Q.o.. L O ,~ O N in C O p 0 Z'?'`' OI 61 (6 (6 C ~ N N O L O1 O O _ O o. O) N a O) --JCa~o~a~co-LL~¢ a.c€ ~ - cLi~oo ~ Jc~ ' ~Lm o~ Emmv, ~ `-raP > ¢ ~ o > o E 3 ~' c ~ ? o m.=;..-; -°m 3 ~ _ ~ a> o ~ o m m u>-4 c ai m=J~ r ° ~ v~m C o~.~° C c > 0 0 o:~ ~N: >. o_ ~ ro°OEJCO a~N~ g~," QJY ovo_N °'O~m E o N . ~ Jo '~ a~ m L o i `o_'EJ i mA {{ S i o L- o o t~~ C ~~ OU ~ U •-• R N N j Y ueN ~ o m U N ~ E > N d t6 o_ m 0 N N N 7 c6 s o.,m O m t6 N N r aY.Jy y O L C O >i .- L C~ N rU, . N O O O -a s ~ ` E~ O U N C C U 'O U ~ N ~ ~:oa, N~ ~ ~ 3~ ~o~mg mo ~~ O O C J d 41 $O~ m mgro t S] :~ E 'm N E C O goo m N~m p E c N O .~? N o.z ~~ a' ~ m.4 ~a ~~ E= m ~O~ L J L U 9 N N o-a ro o o m .- ~ pl Q N S u m o d ao 'O O 0 N 0 0 0 . (~ t ~R1K C O ~ W m N` 3 ~ O O U O ;.~~ ` J N~ O 0 O O L U In Q N ~ L O ~, N 'O U L N O } g? E p_ W W O J o E ro ~- ?JC6 t/1 T C N N O N C y L E C O ~ N t~ ~ U _ 0 0 0 'a ~,OIS O:' T ` d N 0) O m C T m .- E~ R _j, L 0 C J C= N (6 to O ~ W m >i N O U C L U .- "O .J W t6 W U N D- ~ 0 0 C -O O O) J k«e - U ~ '~ D' J€ O U C ~ > N L C U~ i , H ~ • O • d' • G & H-208 • r a ' a a a a o a 0 r ~ r 0 0 0 o 0 a n n n n n ~ m % E m ~ o `o `o o `0 0 a 3 3 ~ 3 a i i a i a i a i a i Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U m m m ~ ~ o ~ o O O ~ a ~ ~ m a n. ° E ._ . - E .. ` ` = ~ o. m o 3 ~ c ~ ~ o > m >` `-° ro ~ > m :~ ro v, a > o ~ ~ ~ arUt° Q°'E o ~ ° 'E ` ° ~ o `a c ro 3U ° o c o o a. _ ~ a c i ~ m ° ' ~ m ~ ~oo oao~ -°OmooETaQa `om.- c~`~ . mro~ >,~ > c o om~ b ~ roo ro~tEcn ~ 'o roroy Lno m E °i ~omr d ~~ a m ~~ ? c ~ L ro O a c ~ L^y.E ro 01 N O) .. o y ~ ~ °'a~~~w ~ m c >. 0 ~ (>6 ~' 41 C a C D e r '~ ? C O) O O I L m ~ ~ E O N O >O ~ (n U p_ C °' a -o ~ E ' E oom~ ~ ~o L 'c°o of°~ °' c m-`o ° ~ 0'a~ ~~m ~ `~ ` ° u U °`°Qa aE°c Em ~ u i ct°-o Sr rom`~ " " m a i a i o ~ E c y~ ro c y m E n ro~ m ro- E~ a a ro E . . L r E~ °~ >. a i o-~ O j~ 0 '_' ~ O N N y a~ U 0 ° ro a ~ ?' N C L j j .~ ro` o (n C .` T O ~-o E h D= ~ o c N a ro a ' O 41 O C -O O C y "T' U N O O •- E o ow ~ ~~oEooo°'? C o~oo oa~iE~` ° ~Lani `mc` y r° m c c m~~ vi ~ r m o E c o 3 ~ m o ?L `o ~ c `° ~ a~ o E m n .- ~ O~ N O~ . ~ j n N ~ m N y N ro ~ - C~ m C~> >~ ' U y m ~ ~ ro ~ ~' E nL o~ o$ ro C °-o o 'w-o c °- c O ` O C c_o ro o N ~_ ~C nI w L ro ~ E E m 7 O a~ ~ ~ E C C ro N ro E ._ 6~ U N . N N O D U O a~ f2 O ro O~ .J (6 C a a~oN~~m°' _ ro d m~'~ Q..o.v jEo ~~~ °~a~~mL - ~mQ~ _ooE a~ a ~~t a a ~ °~ m `° ` o ro ~~ o>aE °i ° °'~ oa ~ a~ m ~ E m N co~ ~ ~ ~ O o mm _ ~ h ~ C y C U Q L ~ p >, 9= O d . D ~ a.a nro o¢ ro Tin O om p 'w O n no ~ ~ ° Q' O ¢ o Ea W ~ cn o ~= o>o C O ~a mU cnU o~ i `° a m N > c m a `~ m o °r nro a°~- ° °a U non w E m~ rn O G & H-209 • a N N N N N N ' a a a a a s a a a a a s 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 ro ro ro m ro m ro o o ro o m ~ CL ~ ~ CL CL ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U U U m 07 ¢l [0 m o] m m m m m U c-°o - m aoroo~o~a~~mE c L c a ~ m ro ~a~ d Sao c ~ bra ro = c~ L `o ~ -o o m o ro m o c aaioo ° ro ooo ES~=o m o > ~ ~ N o Ec ~6o Ln~c o~ro -°oo . °>~~~0`6~,~30 ~ a > a~ ~N~ a~ ~ c mdmN~- ~ mma`airo U`o> C d O O d VL- d G N O N ~- y O L o y~ CL-- C Y R E ~ ~~~~ c L - m .?'a> ° Ea o o E o- ~ ~ o.~ E o ~ ro ~ U .~ ~ 3= .°-" ° m _ . -' ° m aUi ~o ~~ f0 cLi `o-'° ` E m .N - E ~ ° _ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ` a.... rs o ~> ° ~ ~ O ~ °~~- N o NLL aw O ~ m N (n w = a... O N >.o- o _ m ro ~ oa c Q N _ N °' m N C ` ~ .- N °' ° m L L a Q O N E m N '° U ~ro ~ >. U N ~ U -° ~ N a> E o ~ C E m Era~go O ~ 0.. C U ~° ` E ~ ooc > ° d o E~~ L Q~ ~ a ~ 01J ro ~ y C~ ro N° L t0 w a ~ E O C O (~ C ~ ~` U U O h C '- d° E ` ~ p C C N . O N _ U .~.. C N Q E O Cn C N~ O °o E U N O_ O `° ° N a Q" 3 - N v~ a s 'G .fl O L O_ N ~ :~ O .C C c ~ >. ro .~ N _ E U E ` -° Y ul E .U .-~ ~ in 6 - ~ ~ N ro O - E E°- a mro~~m °~UE~ °' Y a ° ~ ac~o~~ a°i s :~~~m ~o c ro-o N i a °~ c ro ~ U E~~ E" i.: a -o ° '~ E2 ... o o a mdN.-- ~ ~ 3 m E c E ~ ~ °~~? a C C o ~ c _ d N - a N U m N ~ i ~ ~ °~w~oa`c° °o ~ t6~a ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ >~ oi o x ~ ~ ~ °i 3 ~ ' ~=~ ~~ m ~- m-°m~ oa oa._ U icc o= ._~ro-oa oro ~ N ~ ° mom ~ oo~ ~?c x N - m N 3a y~m m... C ~~~ -o~ oma ~ c _ o ~-_m~ o_ iaca i ° m °' a im~ o 4a~ Emo~°~?afl. mo~ ° N~-° o3oa a iu~Eo'O-E o Q ~no~ ~ ~ ro ot°~ a~~°'~a o ~~°~ro m ~m~ o~°>~c a>i~o~~~c °' ~ ~~c ~ `°= N w C7 y _ .N U :p 3 N T._ ~ N~ C C a L .C G G N a .U C¢ y X Y -% a N E ° ro E~ •- C ro O c in ro~ m C C U_.. O~ ~ N `4 ro 7 N~ U L~ ro~ p ro N ro ~ N C ro '~ > OJ ¢r o_ o'o o>°ot°¢~mU3 ~ . <na ~? ~~ma F-w~mUE d ~ O U~~m ~EEo_ rn O r G & H-211 ~, ;.:~,® ~ ~r: ' ~~..W:, =~:~ ~~:n yt~~:P ~i~~~. y T~ ~]'E~,; ~ V V ~" xTi9t.~7 N N t ~.y~~ y V 7 ~9 ~ ~~: ru5 F.1+` ~s~ ti"< ' TJ-22: u~ cy~?i ~ a_ U U ~ ~~'a'.'` a a < ~~ Q a m a m a ~" ~ r ° c 0 c 0 O O 3 U U s 3. # D1 i d1 E ~ > N > C N G UI CC W ~~ O U ~ U ~~ ~ t4-;~ U U . ~,n ~: z ^~ 5-0 L+ ~~ . i tG' W U m r~ ~+. :w m m N d N E L o °' f6 ~ O L N ~ N >. C~~ C uJ ~T ~ L Od ro N ~ U~ ~ m h ~``~~'.'==y~ y5~,~." N V1 (0 L- >. N C N >. C~ G C~ ,~ j N Y ,O L i' N ro L o 0 0° N! ' - N~ Z~ F- E o c ° c +.,~ ro o c F- ro E_ ° p c ~ o c O"m m~~ o ~ U °~ ~ o ro mp a i i ~' ~o=a m~ ~C7 ° °C7 ~ a ia m aYi m i a a i m~ o_~'~3~ ~~ ai 3 0 °~ ~ m ?'o ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ Eoa roLU m ~;~~„ 30~ o x EEa~E°'~Y°>~a~ ` o n.~ mo ~ o ~~ a= ~inm Yp'_w ~;~:,a ~ ~ ~ o m ~~ -oaa~_ O ~ O m ~~ T C N U C C 'D . ~ O o w N ~ a Z ~- 0 . L N ~~~a~y'Si ` aH YA N C Cn ro O C U N N L ro p p O ro O (D ~ V E U L - L .r w 0 O ~ ~ a °- m ~ . - Z . - ~ , ~ C ° O. Q C ~ x ~ x 3 o ~ ~ ~-° o c ~ -o > cZZ E m Es ro ro _. o ro ~ d~~ :~ o_~ o p i a i ~n aci ao-o t° .a a m- ~ ~ ° N o w a-6- ~ ~ ~ C7 ro d: a c Y ~ ~ m ~ ,~ '.~:~ ro E Y ~ .~ -' ~ ~ ro a ~ E o i ;•- c ~ m-o a ~ ~ o °o ~c ~ o` E o p oa o ~~{ % o.. . > o= ~ ~ owm ~ w ~ ~ > m ro d~ C a i ~ L E .' O N ~ E o L 3 O) a to N w ~ ~;~ ~ o c~ >, (O ~ i ~ a.E ~ Y o c a- ro N N O E U N O p _ O O U O) - ~ ~~ ' ~' _ N~ O m N (d ( n C ~ p ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ N d -O E y ~, p ~ N O O O !n O L t6 O 'D E i.. + L -O ro t/J ~ O p ? ~ ~ . U ro -O O U ~ =p C N ~- .~ U m ° ~ N X ~> roL- N C . N Z O ~ N O) C t6 [6 Q~ j 0 i ma~~ ""- t 'S 2 '' T O C O) N `o y tq C C O O).C to ro Ol0 O 01 C C '~ .O_. °- a ~ p c o L W ~ ro E ~ w ~ ~ 0 o O O .~ p ~ E m U ~ U ..: ` ~" -i ~ i'~kr'~ c E = c m c m ~ ~ p C ~ > 'O _ O O Y U .- ~ ~ O Y C uJ . C 0 9 O .C O ro E 0 E "0 ~3- ~ T t6 O ~ ~ N ~ N N .~ L O Y "_ O Y 'V O N~ o p'? U O m N c o °~° ° o U E o ° `m Z . , a;?3~: _ °' -o T ` ° ~ U m'~ `~- oT a>i c ~^- c ` ro m m c o o - o m ~ m- mwm o ' `-°a -.~g~:a m o o s E c~Y 3 op ro o o- o ` ro L d '- E U C U O p p ro f C U ~ C U C .~ O w O ~ ~ x' ~ `v` G N~ O W Cn O C to O~ L O ~ N~ O~~ L Ol +" .J O t~ ro O O O Ol ~ ~ L N N d U > N N N .C C ro O) U U -O ro O U ~ U p m L U -O ~N N O N fl_ `~ -6 '6 Y N~ O .- C -O~ , fn d 3 0 L ~ U ~ O ro s ~ E p O U O) ` .. ~ ° y ~ o a c- tii. ~''~N==' E C t6 in ~~ o E~ `-' Q- (n 6~ 7 td ~ ro m-o yacv ~ a~ m m-s ~ N E ° v c ~ ~ U a m ~ ° o ° o ~ ~ i = ~ ' o ~ a o o m~ o~ ~~ ~- = - ~ rn C ~ O ~ o i ~~ E o Q m 9 0~ ' - a d (4 > ~ U m O ~ ° m U ~' o . R ~ Zaz~ o ~ ia U L C C m ass d' ~a a U to ~ -O CUD N N t/1 ..L-~ f n ro C y . .. i - ,; . • ~ • • G & H-212 • • .. 0 U m i C N ~ C O ~ U O m ~ vi ~ ~ ~ tQ c ~ rNi~ C -~ T p~ L N (6 L a p N Y T N D N m~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C ~ O . ~3 cYC~ O C ~ C ~ > > ~ ~ x ~ D1 O a E > N~ c~" m ~ m m ° Y`° EL_ _~~o~~ H O ~ T ~ ~ ~ C - ~ ~ W N t6 ._ ~ ~ J -O N !G C N ~ ~ L ~ CO O C N IO _ ~ `O 'O _O O ~ ~ ~ N E -o m Loo ~ >:Q~ a~ cm p_ ~ U ~q U N N N ~ a ~~ o m-o ~ o z ~ U - ° ~ cn o o ~ ~ o ~ m j 0 01L ~' E U C N C ~ ~ p N ~ ~ > ... N C ~ d ~ > > N O '~ d tq - - ~ -O ~ C ~ C T L C C L (tl d ~U L N N C 0 R .; N a d Q N Y U d t U O T Y O m COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2008-00204 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PHASE II OF CROSSROADS RV STORAGE APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EASTBOUND I-210 AND SOUTHBOUND I-15 FREEWAY LOCATION: INTERCHANGE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Comolehon Date General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or _ employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2008-00204 is granted subject to the approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Text Amendment DRC2007-00935. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-50, Standard /_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary pnorto the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.75 B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ • building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. G & H-214 Project No. DRC2008-00204 Completion Date C D. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shalt be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all /_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuahce. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so • as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/ /_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified m a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property /_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. Shopping Centers 1. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. -/ /- 2. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and /_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 3. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be _/_/_• included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2 G & H-215 Protect No. DRC2008-00204 Completion Date 4. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. Ii shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. ~ B ildi i . u ng Des gn 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Atl parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/_ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and _/_/_ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn- around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. • Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_ the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_ tree per 30 linear feet of building. 3. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. • G & H-216 Project No. DRC2008-00204 Completion Date H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_• Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance'and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. I. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: -/_/- a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; ' f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2008-00204) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. • 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. -/-/- G & H-217 Project No. DRC2008-00204 Completion Date 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Department. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted far plan check and approved prior to.construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public counter). M. New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance wjth California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building • permits. considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / -/-/- -/-/- / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 5 G & H-218 Protect No DRC2008-00204 Completion Date 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees ~COmm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Victoria Street X X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Clty Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. • / / / / / / / / -~-~- -~-~. / / • • G & H-219 Project No. DRC2008-00204 g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. • h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Drainage and Flood Control A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. R. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from • the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. S. General Requirements and Approvals Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right of-way: Caltrans and San Bernardino County Flood Control District. 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. Comolehon Date /-/ /-/ /-/ /_/_ /- - /_/- /_/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- 7 G & H-220 Project No DRC2008-00204 Comoletion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • T. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • 8 G & H-221 .,.aano~_ ~_~' x ~ I • July 28, 2008 Crossroads RV Storage 13650 Victoria Storage Facility DRC2008-00204 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT 1~he RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http.//www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire I3ydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: • a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. Por cul-de- sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. o, If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet fi'om a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one lire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. The required fire flow may be reduced by ~0% if approved automatic fire sprinkler systems are installed in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Pire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall be used to provide required fire flow. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. G & H-222 FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the • underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 12eyuirements Tor Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Pire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Sitc Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures ls~ story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. • 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. "The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GV W). j. Trees and shrub`s planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access lloonvays: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. ]n buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 200] California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When raihvays are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Handscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. CommerciaUIndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspectiomand ftnal acceptance must be requested from FCS. G & H-223 G b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. a Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. • f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fai]- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffc pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. S. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 7~' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. • c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. • Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within "Very High Pire 1-Iazard Severity Zone" (VFIFHSZ), City of Rancho These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. This area designation is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry. 1. Fire Protection Plans: The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code's Fire Safety Overlay District regulations, the 2007 California Building Code Chapter 7A, RCFPD Ordinance FD46, and the recommendations of the Fire Protection Plans. 'T'his codes provides standards regulating and requiring: a. Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Fire Protection Plans (PPP). c. Fire access roadways d. Pire resistive construction and protection of openings. e. Fire sprinkler systems. £ Fire protection water supply. G & H-224 g. Vegetation reduction and management. h. Fire department response. FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specificall}~ described below, which in thejudgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Firc Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store; use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing. Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Metbod Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Firc Marsha] will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Pire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along • with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-1~ Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #8~-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Firc) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Pire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Pire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building pertnit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed; flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: 1'he applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Pire District and CC\VD. On the plan, . show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the y G & H-225 ' 4 hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. Al] temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at ]east ] 4' 6" • above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting The letter to Fire Construction Services. ~. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. 6. Fire Protection Plans: The fire protection plans must be prepared by a qualified professional, submitted for review and approved by the RCFPD before building permit issuance. PRIOR TO TIIE 12ELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' ""Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRI012 TO OCCUPANCI' OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for'hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must'meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Pire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. S. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of al] required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information G & H-226 for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. "this form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site P-an: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/z" x 1 1" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the app]icant to reflect the actual • location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • u G & H-227 b DATE: September 24, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Corkran W. Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director SUBJECT: PUBLIC SLOPING MEETING FORA SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) DRC2008-00381 FOR VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENTS (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN) DRC2008-00383, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC 2008-00384, AND AMENDMETT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DA01-02) DRC2008-00385 - FOREST CITY COMMERCIAL - An opportunity to give public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in an SEIR for a potential build out proposal for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center, located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga bordered by Base Line Road to the north, Foothill Boulevard to the south, Interstate 115 to the east, and Day Creek Boulevard to the west. • PURPOSE: In accordance with the applicable requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Lead Agency for this project, and therefore responsible for the review and consideration of the proposed amendments as well as addressing potential environmental impacts that may be associated with the project. In order to review such impacts the City has determined through preparation of an Initial Study prepared by the EIR consultant, LSA Associates, Inc., that a Supplemental Environmental Impact report is required for this project and is the appropriate CEQA documentation. In compliance with the SEIR preparation process, as outlined in CEQA, the EIR consultant prepared the Notice of Preparation (NOP).. The NOP serves as the public notification that an SEIR is being prepared and requests comment and input from responsible agencies and other interested parties regarding environmental issues to be addressed in the document. In addition to the NOP, CEQA recommends conducting a scoping meeting for the purpose of identifying the range of potential significant impacts that should be analyzed within the scope of the Draft SEIR. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is a request from Forest City Commercial (applicant) to amend the approved Victoria Community Plan by amending the Development Agreement DA01-02 and making minor technical and conforming amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) and related documents to allow flexibility to construct the remaining number of dwelling units and undeveloped commercial office/retail space as previously approved within the VGMP. Also, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan is proposed to be amended to include references to the VGMP and a General Plan Amendment is • proposed to amend Table III-4 to increase dwelling unit density within the Residential Land Use designation for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center. The amendments are designed to allow for the most efficient use of available land area within the VGMP project area, and to ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00381 -LSA Associates, Inc. September 24, 2008 Page 2 _ • allow for creative and distinctive building design solutions in achieving these goals such as increasing the building height to allow for the development of medium-rise (4-12 levels) office, residential or mixed-use buildings. Furthermore, the amendments will allow for the final phases of development contemplated in concept for the subject center. At ultimate build out, the 174-acre site will be developed with approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses as well as up to 600 previously approved multiple-family residential units (310 are currently existing or under construction). The proposed amendments are further described in Section 2.3 of the attached Initial Study. The current project site is designated as the Victoria Planned Community on the Land Use Map and Mixed Use on the City's General Plan. A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residential uses designated as being within the Victoria Planned Community South - A mix of commercial/retail uses designated as being within the Victoria Planned Community East - Interstate 15 (I-15) with residential uses to the east of I-15 West - Multiple-family residential units designated as being within the Victoria Planned Community B. General Plan Designations: North - Mixed Use ~ • South - Mixed Use - East - I-15 Right-of-Way with Medium Residential (8-14 du's/ac) and Commercial designations to the east of I-15 West - Mixed Use CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. The Notice of Preparation and Initial Study Part II were circulated to the attached list of CEQA agencies for the required review and comment period. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission accept public testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in the SEIR (DRC2008-00381) being prepared for the Victoria Community Plan Amendments (amending the Victoria Gardens Master Plan and Victoria Arbors Master Plan) DRC2008-00383, General Plan Amendment DRC 2008-00384, and amendment to the Development Agreement (DA01-02) DRC2008-00385. Res ctfully submitted, O~~ti_ 0 Ja s R. Troyer, AICP PI Wing Director JRT/CN/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Notice of Preparation, dated September 8, 2008 • Exhibit B -Initial Study prepared by LSA Associates Inc., dated September 4, 2008 I-2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF PREPARATION • • • To: Distribution List Date: September 8, 2008 Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909)477-2750 Contact: Corkran W. Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director Consulting Firm Preparing the Draft EIR: LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92501 (951)781-9310 Contact: Lynn Calvert-Hayes, AICP, Principal The CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA will be the Lead Agency and is preparing a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which should be included in the SEIR. If you represent an agency, we are particularly interested in information germane to your statutory responsibilities. If you are a public agency, you may need to use the SEIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. This Notice of Preparation contains a brief project description and identifies the environmental issues to be examined in the EIR. A copy of the Initial Study (D is ^ is not) attached. Please send your response to Mr. Corkran W. Nicholson, at the address shown above. Please include the name, phone number, and address of a contact person in your response. Project Title: Victoria Gardens Master Plan Amendments Project Applicant: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909)477-2750 Project Location: The proposed project is located west of and adjacent to Interstate 15, north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Base Line Road, and east of Day Creek Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Project Description: Forest City Commercial (applicant) is proposing to amend the approved Victoria Community Plan by amending the Development Agreement DA01-02 and making minor technical and conforming amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) and related documents to allow flexibility to construct the remaining number of dwelling units and undeveloped commercial office/retail space as previously approved within the VGMP. `~ The Victoria Arbors Master Plan is proposed to be amended to include references to the VGMP and a General Plan Amendment is proposed to amend Table III-4 to increase dwelling unit density within the Residential Land Use designation for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center. The amendments are designed to allow for the most efficient use of available land area within the VGMP project area, and to allow for `~° creative and distinctive building design solutions in achieving these goals. ~~ ~ ® (city) doc I -3 NOTICE OF PREPARATION City o/Rancho Cucamonga Previous Environmental Documentation Victoria Arbors Village EIR On July 7, 1999, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the Final EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 98041137) for the Victoria Arbors Village project. The Final EIR addressed potential impacts associated with the conversion of 64.3 acres of multi-family to single family residential; 58.76 acres of regional related office commercial to single family residential, medium density residential, and high density residential; 18.74 acres of open space and lakes to residential; and 13.28 acres of multifamily residential to a school-park; 2.9 acres of community facilities to single family residential, and 8.44 of low-medium density residential to low density single family residential in the Victoria Community Plan area. Approximately 26 acres of office/professional were proposed to be converted to single family residential in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Because the City did not approve the Victoria Arbors Village project, rio change in on-site zoning occurred. Zoning for the project site remained that which existed prior to preparation of the Final EIR. While the City did not approve the project, it certified as accurate, adequate, and complete the Final EIR which provided environmental evaluation of the impacts associated with the Victoria Arbors Village project. At that time, the City did not adopt Facts and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Final EIR identified significant and unavoidable adverse impacts from air quality that would result from the implementation of the Victoria Arbors Village project and/or its alternatives. Victoria Arbors Village Initial Studv/Addendum • Subsequent to the 1999 certification of the Victoria Arbors Village Final EIR, an application was made to the City for an amendment to the City's General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Etiwanda Specific Plan. This application requested changes in land use designations from residential and regional retail uses to mixed uses. An Addendum to the Victoria Arbors Village Final EIR was prepared to address potential impacts associated with the rezoning of the project site from residential and regional commercial uses to a "mixed use" designation. In instances where the modifications of a previously approved project are minor and/or non-significant, a Lead • Agency may prepare an addendum (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164). The Addendum did not identify any new impacts or significantly increased impacts resulting from the rezoning of the project site. The addendum was certified as adequate on December 20, 2000. The City approved the proposed changes to land use designations on December 20, 2000. Victoria Gardens Master Plan EIR On February 20, 2002, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the Victoria Gardens Master Plan and certified an EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2001031028) (Resolution No. 02-056) that addressed the environmental impacts associated with implementation of a master plan for an 174-acre mixed use project. The project provided planning guidelines for land uses within the 174-acre area and included the combination of 147 acres of (City of Rancho Cucamonga) Redevelopment Agency controlled property, 18 acres of undeveloped property, and 9 acres of land previously dedicated for street right-of-ways. At ultimate build out, the 174-acres will be built with approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses as well as up to 600 multiple- family residential units. The Victoria Gardens Master Plan EIR examined the significant environmental effects associated with development of the land uses proposed for the following discretionary actions on biological and cultural resources, air quality, noise, public services and transportation: • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment (GPA) -Changes the designation of the project site from Regional Center (RC) to Mixed Use (MU); modifies established criteria for the spacing of roadway medians. Victoria Community Plan Amendment (VCPA) -Changes the designation of the project site from Regional • Center to Mixed Use; modifies text and graphics. • Development Agreement -vests land use entitlements. R:\GRG0803_Victoria GardensWOP\NOP (city).doc I-4 NOTICE OF PREPARATION City o/Rancho Cucamonga • Master Plan -sets forth the permitted land uses and development standards for the project site. • Approval of Tentative Parcel Maps -subdivides the project site for commercial uses. The City approved the project, and certifed as accurate, adequate, and complete the Final EIR which provided environmental evaluation of the impacts associated with the project. The City also adopted Facts and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations that stated that the benefts of the project outweigh the significant and unavoidable adverse impacts from air quality and traffic that would result from the implementation of the project and/or its alternatives. Potential Environmental Effects The proposed project may produce environmental effects associated with aesthetics and air quality. The SEIR will include an analysis of these topics. The SEIR will address the short-term and long-term effects of the project on the environment, the proposed project's potential to cause direct and indirect growth inducing impacts, and cumulative impacts associated with the proposed project. Alternatives to the proposed project will be evaluated that may reduce impacts that are determined to be significant in the SEIR. Mitigation will be proposed for those impacts that are determined to be significant to reduce those impacts to less than significant levels. Impacts that are determined to be significant after mitigation will be identified. A mitigation monitoring program will also be developed as required by Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines. The scope of the environmental analysis for the proposed project is subject to comments from agencies and the public. This notice of preparation will remain in effect fora 30-day public review period per Public Resources Code Section 21080.4 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15082. Public agencies, interested organizations, and individuals have the opportunity to comment on and identify those environmental issues which have the potential to be affected by the project and should be addressed further by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the EIR. • Public Review Period of the Notice of Preparation September 8, 2008 -October 8, 2008 Public Scoping Meeting In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.9, a public Scoping meeting regarding the project is required. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has scheduled a public Scoping meeting at the date, time, and place shown below. The purpose of the Scoping meeting is'to obtain input regarding the environmental impacts that will be included in the environmental impact report for the subject project. You are invited to attend. Date: Time: Location: September 24, 2008 7:00 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga City Hall Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Date: September B, 2008 Signature: l M'~ ~ /1,n I I l ! 11 n Y ~ ~M Title: /~SS-~. ~~G.-NN~U h • ~~re U~DiQ • C'\WINDOWS\Temporary Internet Ftles10LK26\NOP (city) (11),doc. I-5 Notice of Completion 8r Environmental Document Transmittal ,t /ni/ ro: State Clearinghouse. P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95612-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hund Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento. CA 95814 Project cHa Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonea Contact Person: Corkv Nicholson Assistant Planning Director Street Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive Phone: (9091477-2750 City' Rancho Cucamonea Zip: 91730 County: San Bernardino Project Location: County: San Bernardino - CityMearest Community: Rancho Cucamonea Cross Streets: Day Creek Blvd. & Church Street. Zip Code: 91730 Lat./Long.: 34" 6' 38.96" N / 117° 31' 56.92" W Acres: 174 Assessor's Parcel Nos 0227-2I-144 0227-45-234, 235. 243-246: 0227-46-402. 407 412, 439-441. 443-450. 452. 453.455-457; 0227-70-239.240. 241 301-369.371-360. and 401-454 Section: S Twp. IS Rng. 6W Base: SBBM Within 2 Miles: Hwy #: I-I5. 1-10. 1-210/SR 30. SR 66 Waterways: none Airports: none Railways: none Schools: Elementary: Lightfoot. Windrow, Tierra Vista Graoeland, Perdew Intermediate: Etiwanda Hieh School: Rancho Cucamonea Document Type: ~ CEQA: O NOP ^ Draft EIR NEPA: ^ NOI Other: ^ Joint Document ^ Early Cons ~ SupplemenVSubsequent EIR ^ EA ^ Final Document ^ Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) 2001031028 ^ Drafl EIS ^ Other ^ Mit Neg Dec ^ Other ^ FONSI Local Action Type: ^ General Plan Update ^ Specific Plan ^ Rezone ^ Annexation ^O General Plan Amendment ^ Master Plan ^ Prezone ^ Redevelopment ^ General Plan Element ^ Planned Unit Development ^ Use Permit ^ Coastal Permit ^ Community Plan ^ Site Plan ^ Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) ® Other Master Plan Amendment ^ Residential: Units Acres ^ Water Facilities: Type MGD ^ Commercial: Sq.R._ Acres _ Employees ^ Mining: Mineral ^ Industrial: Sq.ft. Acres Employees ^ Power: Type Watts ^ Educational: _ ^ Waste Treatment: Type ^ Recreauonal: ^ Hazardous Waste: Type ® Other Mixed Use: 174 acres of retail, residential, commercial, business office, and civic cultuml arts center uses. in AestheticNisual ^ Recreation/Parks Agricultural Land ^ Schools/Universities Air Quality ard ^ Septic Systems Archaeological/Historical ^ Sewer Capacity Biological Resources ^ Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading Coastal Zone ^ Solid Waste Drainage/Absorption 3alance ^ Toxic/Hazardous Economic/Jobs ies ^ Traffic/Circula[ion Other Global Climate Change ^ Vegetation ^ Water Quality ^ Water Supply/Groundwater ^ Wetland/Riparian ^ Wildlife ^ Growth-Inducing ^ Land Use ^ Cumulative Effects Present Land Use/Zaning/Ceneral Plan Designation: Present Land Use: Vacant & Mixed Use (commercial, retail, residential, civic cultural arts center) Zoning: Mixed Use General Plan: Mixed Use Project Description: The Victoria Garden Master Plan was prepared as the governing land use and design document fora 174-acre site within the eastern area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga The Master Plan was approved by the City in 2001. The 174-acre project site included the combination of 147 acres of (City of Rancho Cucamonga) Redevelopment Agency controlled property, I S acres of undeveloped property, and 9 acres of land previously dedicated for street right-of--ways. A[ ultimate build out, the 174-acres will be built with approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office. and civic uses as well as up to 600 multiple-family residential units. Currently, 60 percent ofthecommercial/retail, business office, and civic center uses and 52% of the residential units within the Master Plan has been built. The project applicant (Forest Cih~) is proposing to amend the Master Plan to include minor technical and conforming amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) and related documents to allow flexibility to conswet the remaining number of dwelling units and undeveloped commercial olTice/retail space as approved within the VGMP. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan is proposed to be amended to include references to the VGMP and a • General Plan Amendment amending Table III-4 to increase dwelling unit density within the Residential Land Use designation for the Victoria Gardens liegional Mned Use Lifestyle Center The amendments are designed to allow for the most efficient use of available land area within the V (iMP prglect area. and to allow Ibr creative and distinctive hmlding design solutions in achieving these goals. I-6 Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County Of San Bernardino 385 Arrowhead, 2^d Floor Bernardino, CA 92415 0803 IS/NOP Hard Copy LCH Mr. John DeWitt Southern California Gas Co. 1981 Lugonia Ave. Redlands, CA 92374 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Mr. Gary Hackney Inland Empire Utilities Agency PO Box 9020 Chino Hills, CA 91709 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Daniel Kopulsky, Office Chief Forecasting/IGR-CEQA Review Department of Transportation 464 Fourth St., 6~" Floor, MS 722 San Bernardino, CA 92401 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Chief Peter Bryan Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA,91730 803 IS/NOP CD LCH rshall Davis Water Quality Lab Manager Metropolitan Wafer Distract 700 North Moreno Ave. La Verne, CA 91750 CRG0803 ISINOP CD LCH Director of Planning San Bernardino County Planning Department 385 North Arrowhead Ave. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Director of Business Services Chaffey Joint Union High School District 211 West 5'" St. Ontario, CA 91761 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Janet Morey, Superintendent Alta Loma School District 9390 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH • Cucamonga Valley Water District 1044 Ashford Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3057 CRG0803 ISINOP CD LCH Local Government -CEQA Program Supervisor Southern Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Kim Bray Verizon PO Box 725 Chino, CA 91708 CRG0603 IS/NOP CD LCH Jeff Newman U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 6010 Hidden Valley Road Carlsbad, CA 91764 CRG0803 ISINOP CD LCH Captain.Joe Cusimano San Bernardino County Sheriff Rancho Cucamonga Substation 10510 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH City Planner City of Ontario 303 East B St. Ontario, CA 91764 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH CA Reg. Water Quality Control Board #8 Santa Ana Region 3737 Main Street, Suite 500 Riverside, CA 92501 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Edison International 1351 East Francis Ontario, CA 91764 CRG0603 IS/NOP CD LCH Department of Transportation Development Review, MS 722 464 W. Fourth St. San Bernardino, CA 92401 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH California Department of Fish and Game 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 CRG08031S/NOP CD LCH Mr. Jeff Bloom Community Development Director City of Upland 460 North Euclid Ave. Upland, CA 91786 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Mr. Don Williams Planning Manager City of Fontana 8353 Sierra Ave. Fontana, CA 92335 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Eric Roth Ty Schuiling Southern California Assoc of Governments Director of Comprehensive Planning . 818 West T^ St 12'^ Floor San Bernardino Co. Associated Governments ., 1170 West 3'd St., 2^d Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 San Bernardino, CA 92410-1715 CRG0803 ISINOP CD LCH CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Superintendent Etiwanda School District 6061 East Ave. Etiwanda, CA 91739 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Superintend Cucamonga School District 8776 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH Sheri Nagel, Superintendent Central School District 10601 Church St., Ste., 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CRG0803 ISINOP CD LCH Dr. Jerry Young Chaffey Community College District 5885 Haven Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH I-7 Ken Miller San Bernardino County Flood Control District 825 East 3rd St. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 • CRG0803 IS/NOP CD LCH • • I-8 INITIAL STUDY VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA • Prepared for: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 477-2750 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200 Riverside, California 92507 (951)781-9310 LSA Project No. CRG0803 LSA • September 4, 2008 ~~f-1~®~ 1 I-s TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ ...... .. . 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................... ......... ... 1-1 1 2 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION ........................................... .............. 1-3 1.3 PURPOSE OF INITIAL STUDY ........................................................................ ............... 1-5 1.4 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE .............. ............... 1-8 1 5 CONTACT PERSONS ..............:......................... ...................... ........ ..... . .......... 1-8 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................... ...... .................2-1 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING ........ .............. ............................................... 2-1 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN ..................................... 2-1 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN) ............................................................................... 2-2 3.0 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST .......................................................... ... ..... .......................... 3-1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................... ............................ 3-1 GLOSSARY .................................................................................................. ................ ..... 3-3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ........... ............ .. .... ................ 3-4 • DETERMINATION ...................................................................... ... ... ....... ..................... .... 3-4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . ...... .......................... ........................... 3-6 1. AESTHETICS ..................... ............ ........... ............................ ............................3-6 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ............... ... ........................... ............................ 3-9 3. AIROUALITY ............................................................................ ... . ........................3-12 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES . ........................................... .... . ............ ..........3-20 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................. ......... ............... 3-23 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................. ....................... ..................... 3-26 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS ................................ ..:..... .. ...... ............... 3-30 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ... .. ... ........ ............. ......................... 3-34 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING ...................... ..... ............................. ................ ...... 3-39 10. MINERAL RESOURCES ... ...... .. .. ........ .......... ...... .. ......... ....... 3-42 11. NOISE .................. .. .. 3-44 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING .. ..... ............. .... .. ... ... 3-50 13. PUBLIC SERVICES ... ... ...... ............................... ... ... . ......................... 3-53 14. RECREATION .......... .. .. .. .. ..................................................... ................ 3-56 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ... .................................................. ........... ..... . 3-58 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ......:.............................. ... ......................... 3-66 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................ .................. ...... 3-71 REFERENCES ........... .... ....... ............................... ..... ............. ........... .......... 3-74 R.1CRG0803_Victona Gardensllndial Study\TABLE OF CONTENTS.doc (9/4/2008) I I -10 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES 1 Regional and Project Location ......................................................................................................1-2 2 Existing Land Uses and Proposed Taller Building Areas within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan ...................................................................................................................................2-3 3 Proposed Building Height Restrictions within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan .........................2-4 TABLES 2.A Proposed and Approved Building Area within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan ........................2-5 2.8 Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan ................2-5 • • R:\CRGOB03_Victoda Gardens\Initial Study\TABLE OF CONTENTS.doc (9/M2008) I ~1 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE City of Rancho Cucamonga INITIAL STUDY 1'.0 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study evaluates the changes proposed to the approved Victoria Gardens Master Plan to determine whether those changes require additional environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in relationship to the previously certified Victoria Gardens Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR State Clearinghouse #2001031028), 2001, prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. under contract to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Victoria Gardens Master Plan and the previous Final EIR, together with all other environmental documents incorporated by reference herein, serve as the environmental review of the proposed project, as required pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and State and local CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project reviewed in this Initial Study includes amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VDMP). The proposed project is a request from Forest City (applicant) to amend the Victoria Gardens Master Plan and related documents to allow flexibility to construct the remaining number of dwelling units and undeveloped commercial office/retail space as approved within the VGMP. The amendments are designed to allow for the most efficient use of available land area within the • VGMP project area, and to allow for creative and distinctive building design solutions in achieving these goals. The project site (shown locally and regionally in Figure 1) is located adjacent to Interstate 215, north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Base Line, and east of Day Creek Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and State and local CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the Lead Agency, and is charged with the responsibility of deciding whether or not to approve the proposed amendments to the Victoria Garden Master Plan (proposed project or project). As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider the potential environmental effects that could result from implementation of the project. The type of environmental determination that may be reached ranges from: • A finding that the proposed project's impacts fall fully within the scope of the original certified EIR, so no additional environmental documentation is required; • The proposed project includes some changes or additions to the project analyzed in the 2001 EIR; however: 1) Impacts from the proposed modified project are not significant and no additional mitigation is required. In this case, an Addendum to the EIR would be the appropriate CEQA determination; 2) Impacts are not significant, but additional mitigation measures are required, so a Negative Declaration must be processed to comply with CEQA; or 3) New significant impacts are associated with the proposed project, so a supplemental or • subsequent EIR must be prepared. I -12 L_IJ_ L~J ~--J-: 3 F ~~ 1 I 1- it ~ ~~ I - ~ _ _ _ _ _ -I'- _ ~p _ - YF -"`s •~ - I a<sc_- =~€z -__ _-BA SEL/NE ROAD- - ono - a E A.. ' - -~M- - .. ,cam 0 .~ry : I 5 II I.. I - _ ~, ~> tiwa da • _ ; l ~1~_vi: ~,J j ~ • > 4 , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' l / -Q ,,_' ° W~ . ~ -hi ° Project L ocation " m ~' - Y ;-Ir n - vI ` ` - ' ._ .. :~ ;. v CHURCH STREET - - - • _ ` r ~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ I .. " . __~ , t .\ V ~ \;. .1~ ~ _ .. MILLER AV 1'.: % pc _ , .. ~ • ~ . N' . ~ T 9 I. ,. V - ' ^~... I ' ~ ~ ~~ S• W / ~ wrt __ ;_FOOTHILC BOULEVARD (RTE. 66) ° " ~i ,~ ••.Y. % oE VO !u P' Y _ , ~ R ~~~ • L • • I ••~_ ~ I; _ I ..-- 1.1 _ -d __ ~ _ I . ..: ~- ,..~~ _ ~ I. " -.. _ _ l f 'I rfio 'I u' ~ _ -~ - I ~ ~ I: ~ _ _ _ _ "" - -ARROW ROUTE-- P' nRROw I 'i'ce--.aoure ~I I I „ a --~- ~ - ~ I • - i' _ - ~. . o ~ ~ -Ile^~~ ~°=9-•- _ ----U Regional Location ~ ~ ` ~ : ~w • -, o. - l., I ~ J 1 `Iil ~ k • o 1 AnAeln (.m v ~_-~fon Aerrwre/rmrfnnniv , ~__~.^-_ + - I t:~ l • •• II • ~ - p 7 - ~dEti '~51~`~ tl o S .• •~•I YVE .• .WFVTIWAN. ~ II •~~~ . ~--j ~ Project Area ~, _ l , B) m _ -' I ~•I Win, . , ~ dLil ~ ~ _ r ..I I - J r~-~t~~- .-+rr FF. 14 -- ~ ~ ~1 ' I-i ~ J l - .t~ _- _ _i _ _Y.- __ _ ~ n ~ ~ _ ~I=..•' :;JC. __-- -_-` -f"...r,~- I -• ~ i ~ ' ~ - y •, -1L` .~;f: ~ _{1...- _~ fCI .C]-+1I-'~=lf~f~_I? '~~.-I l__ _ r, ~ g ~~ _ _ •II~afa K T- ~ 'Wale) tank ' ." '~ ' ' --~3 I ~ 4' t~ - - /II 1.,f~C;~ -',~TI1>~ ~ i.LeLi~l I (~ ~ :'~~•. ' - ~ ~ ~® T ~ ~ Pawo_Inln~ji ~ P I ''i -. I ate '- I ~~ ZI PER " ~1 FEEDER ~~ _ ©~_ cra_ -:~~~ ~, ~, ~, ~~~; tV7_ c P=~'-:•.~ ~_ '`I ' \ .yy f~ yr t` .. ~ ^ ~ Mti~_ (9 tJ rr ~I~ , "' ",._ "4''~^r :~: ~ ' t~'~' i ``~~_^-~~ ~; ® ~ .I 6~1~~ V 'j'~I~•.g lT r' ~- t F ~1 ~ wetc Y_~~~ ~ "~ ~ " ,i III yti -,- _ti. .I, \ -lor,~.,rer rrr ,- ~,_~ t`:Sf 7 iYT-' ' 4 _ _ ~ ~ I ~- ,eQ~ i~ .` '~ tJL i~_FI i ~r:-0 n}r~f \ ® if ~IL %"~, lrmq• 1_ 111 J ®l N ~ - _. I ~7 __. YTdf ~ rll 'i I ~~.- ': .x' __-_- ,~f,.l I'~ J~ (I Ir~~O tu~dtl ° ~' '~_ _ A ~~ a"' r ~9 ;2~ ~ I ~r ~ "` {~ - ~ =1 `vj. d~Y_ -___---=1 b I . ~ ` ,. '~ _~. ':-}j~51~ to so ~ ryV' ~ I _ i 'T --r ~ Wetel'~ ~it Ir-=~u'- n ii 1 T / nY PaCIflC 0003n ~~ri , Mur® ~ .- ~Wel _ Q, 2 en e i i • ~ s I ' ~ I . ~i I 1 IW , i - , '..,R~m.-... . ' i~ / 1. ~ I _ .. - - ~ ~. LSA N a \,ooo s,ooo 1-~ Feel SOURCE USGS 7 5' Quad Gnxsu (1981), CA, Thomas Hlus, 2007 FIGURE 1 I~ • Amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan • Initial Study Regional and Site Location I \CRGU803\Rcpons\IS\re~ ioc m>,d (09!04/OR) I -13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-3 • The analysis presented in the following sections supports the finding that a supplemental EIR is required for the proposed project and is the appropriate CEQA documentation. 1.2 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION Victoria Arbors Village EIR On July 7, 1999, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified the Final EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 98041137) for the Victoria Arbors Village project. The Final EIR addressed potential impacts associated with the conversion of 64.3 acres of multi-family to single family residential; 58.76 acres of regional related office commercial to single family residential, medium density residential, and high density residential; 18.74 acres of open space and lakes to residential; and 13.28 acres of multifamily residential to a school-park; 2.9 acres of community facilities to single family residential, and 8.44 of low-medium density residential to low density single family residential in the Victoria Community Plan area. Approximately 26 acres of officelprofessional were proposed to be converted to single family residential in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Because the City did not approve the Victoria Arbors Village project, no change in on-site zoning occurred. Zoning for the project site remained that which existed prior to preparation of the Final EIR. While the City did not approve the project, it certified as accurate, adequate, and complete the Final EIR which provided environmental evaluation of the impacts associated with the Victoria Arbors Village project. At that time, the City did not adopt Facts and Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The Final EIR identified significant and unavoidable adverse impacts • that would result from the implementation of the Victoria Arbors Village project and/or its alternatives. Operational emissions of the proposed project would have resulted in total emissions of 2,034 lbs./day of CO, 153 lbs./day of ROC, 326 lbs./day of NOx, 36 lbs./day of SOx, and 47 lbs./day of PM10. Emission levels of CO, ROC, and NOx would have exceeded South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for long-term operations. Even after implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR, it was not guaranteed that the emissions would be reduced to below the significance thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on air quality during daily operations would have remained significant and unavoidable. Victoria Arbors Village Initial Study/Addendum Subsequent to the 1999 certification of the Victoria Arbors Village Final EIR, an application was made to the City for an amendment to the Citys General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Etiwanda Specific Plan. This application requested changes in land use designations from residential and regional retail uses to mixed uses. An Addendum to the Victoria Arbors Village Final EIR was prepared to address potential impacts associated with the rezoning of the project site from residential and regional commercial uses to a "mixed use" designation. In instances where the modifications of a previously approved project are minor and/or non-significant, a Lead Agency may prepare an addendum (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164). The Addendum did not identify any new impacts or significantly increased impacts resulting from the rezoning of the project site. The addendum was certified as adequate on December 20, 2000. The City approved the proposed changes to land use designations on December 20, 2000. • The City Council adopted a Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the Victoria Arbors Village project on December 20, 2000. This Statement found the economic, R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-08.doc I -14 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-4 social or other benefits of the Victoria Arbors Village project and its alternatives outweighed the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR. In making"this finding, the Council balanced the benefits of the project and its alternatives against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. Victoria Gardens Master Plan EIR On February 20, 2002, the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the Victoria Gardens Master Plan and certified an EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2001031028) (Resolution No. 02-056) that addressed the environmental impacts associated with implementation of a master plan for an 174-acre mixed use project. The project provided planning guidelines for land uses within the 174-acre area included the combination of 147 acres of (City of Rancho Cucamonga) Redevelopment Agency controlled property, 18 acres of undeveloped property, and 9 acres of land previously dedicated for street right-of-ways. At ultimate build out, the 174-acres will be built with approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses as well as up to 600 multiple-family residential units. The Victoria Gardens Master Plan EIR examined the significant environmental effects associated with development of the land uses proposed for the following discretionary actions on biological and cultural resources, air quality, noise, public services and transportation: • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Amendment (GPA) -Changes the designation of the project site from Regional Center (RC) to Mixed Use (MU); modifies established criteria for the spacing of roadway medians. • Victoria Community Plan Amendment (VCPA) -Changes the designation of the project site from Regional Center to Mixed Use; modifies text and graphics. • Development Agreement -vests land use entitlements. • Master Plan -sets forth the permitted land uses and development standards for the project site. Approval of Tentative Parcel Maps -subdivides the project site for commercial uses. It was determined that three freeway segments (I-15 northbound from Jurupa Street to I-10, I-10 eastbound from Archibald Avenue to I-15, and I-10 eastbound from Etiwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue) are forecast to operate below the LOS E threshold under year 2007 with project conditions in the a.m. and./or p.m. peak hour. Six freeway segments (I-15 northbound from SR-60 to Duncan Canyon Road, I-10 eastbound from Vineyard Avenue to I-15, I-10 eastbound from Etiwanda Avenue to Cherry Avenue, I-10 westbound from I-15 to Milliken Avenue, SR-210 eastbound from Carnelian Street Day Creek Boulevard, and SR-210 eastbound from Cherry Avenue to East Avenue) are forecast to operate below the LOS E threshold under year 2020 with project conditions. Improvements to I-10 and I-15 are under the authority of.Caltrans. While the addition of the freeway lanes would maintain freeway operations at acceptable levels, there is no mechanism for development project proponents tc pay fees or make fair share contributions towards improving mainline freeway lanes. Even if such a mechanism existed, there is no way to ensure that such payments would be directed to a specific freeway improvement project. Consequently, there are no feasible mitigation measures for these impacts. These impacts remain significant and unavoidable. R:\CRG0803_Victoda GardensVnitial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-OB.doc • u • I -15 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-5 • It was also determined that short-term construction emissions would exceed the air quality district's daily thresholds for the criteria pollutants of NOX and PM10 would remain significant with implementation of mitigation measures. Total emissions of CO, NOX, ROC, and PM10 resulting from the long-term operation (stationary sources and mobile sources) of the project. No feasible mitigation measures are available to reduce long-term air quality emissions from project related vehicles to a less than significant level. Therefore, the project would have a significant impact on air quality after mitigation. As the Lead Agency, the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the information in the EIR before certifying the document and approving the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. The City Council adopted a Statement of Facts and Findings and Overriding Considerations for the Victoria Gardens Master Plan on February 20, 2002 This Statement found the economic, social or other benefits of the Victoria Gardens Master Plan and its alternatives outweighed the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in the Final EIR. In making this finding, the Council balanced the benefits of the project and its alternatives against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. Subsequent to the approval of the Victoria Gardens Master Plan, approximately 52 percent of the residential dwelling units and approximately 57 percent of the commercial/office and civic uses of the Master Plan has been completed. The uses that currently exist include 310 dwelling units, commercial, retail, dining, civic uses (library and theater), cinema, and fast food establishments. 1.3 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY • Pursuant to CEQA, State CEQA Guidelines, and the Cites local CEQA guidelines, this Initial Study assesses the proposed project in order to determine whether the proposed amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan would result in conditions that would require new environmental documentation to be prepared, as outlined above. This Initial Study also reviews any new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Final EIR was certified. It further examines whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a supplemental or subsequent EIR is required. This examination focuses on whether the analysis, findings, and conclusions in the Final EIR adequately address the impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project and to identify any requirements to modify approved mitigation measures. Pursuant to CEQA, State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's CEQA guidelines, the City's environmental review of the proposed project is limited to examining the environmental effects associated with the changes between the previously approved project as analyzed in the certified Final EIR, and the proposed project (the amendments). This focus is due to the fact that the Final EIR has already addressed the environmental impacts of developing the proposed project, and the Rancho Cucamonga City Council certified that the Final EIR was adequate and met the provisions of CEQA for this purpose. 1.3.1 Use of Supplement to a Previously Certified EIR Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum.to an EIR shall be prepared "if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. A proposed change in a project will require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR if: R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-OB.doc I -16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-6 Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR or a negative declaration due to an involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. 3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could have not been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, shows: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; b. The significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than identified in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. If none of the above conditions is met, the City is not required to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Rather, the City may require preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration or an Addendum, or the City may decide that the existing EIR adequately addresses the impacts of the proposed project and, therefore, no further environmental documentation are necessary. This Initial Study has evaluated each of the issues addressed in the Final EIR, as well as each of the issues contained in the checklist presented in Section 3.0 of this document. Based on this analysis and the information contained herein, there is evidence that the proposed project requires changes to the Final EIR. Comparison of the previous project with the proposed project, as described in Section 2.3 of this document, indicates that there are new significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan. This Initial Study relies on use of an Environmental Checklist Form (Form), as suggested in Section 15063 (d)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Form is used: To evaluate whether or not there are any new or more severe significant environmental effects associated with the proposed project; and To review whether there is new information or circumstances that would require preparation of additional environmental documentation in the form of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, or if an Addendum is appropriate. Section 3.0 of this document contains the Checklist Form and explains the basis for each response to the questions on the Form. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-OB.doc • • I -17 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-7 ~J 1.3.2 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts This Initial Study uses an Environmental Checklist Form to compare the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed project with the impacts previously identified in the certified Final EIR. Based on this comparative analysis, it has been determined that the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines require preparation of a supplemental EIR is met. The Form is used to review the potential environmental effects of the proposed project for each of the following areas: Aesthetics • Agricultural Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population and Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportationlfraffic • Utilities/Services • Cumulative Impacts There are six possible responses to each of the questions included on the Form: 1. Substantial Change in Project Requiring Major Revision of Previous EIR. This response is used when the project has changed to such an extent that major revisions of the previous EIR are required due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or an increase in the severity of the previously identified significant effects. 2. Substantial Change in Circumstances Under Which Project is Undertaken Requiring Major Revision of Previous EIR. This response is used when the circumstances under which the project is undertaken have changed to such an extent that major revisions of the previous EIR are required because such changed circumstances would result in the project having new significant environmental effects or would substantially increase the severity of the previously identified significant effects. 3. New Information of Substantial Importance Showing New or Greater Significant Effects than Identified in Previous EIR. This response is used when new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, shows that the project would have a new significant environmental effect or more severe significant effect than identified in the previous EIR. 4. New Information of Substantial Importance Showing Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impacts Identified in Previous EIR. This response is used when new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows: a. The significant environmental effects of the project could be substantially reduced through imposition of mitigation measures or alternatives that, although previously found to be infeasible, are in fact now feasible, but the project proponent declines to adopt them; or R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-08.doc I -18 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 1-8 • b. The significant environmental effects of the project could be substantially reduced through imposition of mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR, but the project proponent declines to adopt them. 5. Less Than Significant ImpactlNo Changes or Circumstances and No New Information That Would Require the Preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR. This response is used when (1) the potential impact of the project is determined to be below known or measurable thresholds of significance, or (2) there are no changes in the project or circumstances, and no new information that would require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 6. No Impact. This response is used when the proposed project does not have any measurable environmental impact. The Form and accompanying evaluation of the responses provide the information and analysis upon which the City of Rancho Cucamonga may make its determination that a supplemental EIR is required for the project. 1.4 EXISTING DOCUMENTS TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelrnes permits an environmental document to incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data. The documents outlined in this section are hereby incorporated by reference, and the pertinent material is summarized throughout this Initial Study, where that information is relevant to the analysis of impacts of the project. All documents incorporated by reference are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department. • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Amended October 26, 1988. • City of Rancho Cucamonga Master Environmental Assessment and General Plan Environmental Impact Report, Planning Network, January 4, 1989. Final Environmental Impact Report Victoria Arbors Village SCH No. 98041137, LSA Associates, Inc., May 20, 1999. Initial Study/Addendum Victoria Arbors Village, LSA Associates, Inc., November 2, 2000. • Victoria Gardens Final Environmental Impact Report, December 19, 2001, State Clearinghouse #2001031028 and associated technical appendices. • Victoria Gardens Master Plan, January 18, 2002. 1.5 CONTACT PERSONS The Lead Agency for this Initial Study is the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Any questions about the preparation of this document, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to: Corkran W. Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section t Introduction 9-4-08.doc I ~19 • • Initial Study for AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (909) 477-2750 (909) 477-2847(fax) City Hall Hours of Operation Monday-Thursday 7:00 a.m.- 6:00 p.m. R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensVnitial Study\Section 1 Introduction 9-4-08 doc I -20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1-9 City of Rancho Cucamonga INITIAL STUDY 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING 2.1.1 Regional and Project Location The Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) project site is located in the eastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The 174-acre project site is bordered by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Baseline on the north, Day Creek Boulevard on the east, and Interstate 15 on the west. The project site is planned to be built out with commercial, office, residential and public uses along with the associated infrastructure. Previously referenced Figure 1 shows the regional and project location. 2.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN The Victoria Garden Master Plan was prepared as the governing land use and design document for a 174-acre site within the eastern area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The VGMP was approved by • the City in 2001. The 174-acre project site included the combination of 147 acres of (City of Rancho Cucamonga) Redevelopment Agency controlled property, 18 acres of undeveloped property, and 9 acres of land previously dedicated for street right-of-ways. At ultimate build out, the 174-acres will be built with approximately 2.45 million square feet of retail, office, and civic uses as well as up to 600 multiple-family residential units. The development scenario for the Victoria Gardens project envisions development of a "new downtown" consisting of an open air mixed use complex which includes an attractive and compatible blend of major retail tenants, specialty commercial uses, restaurant and entertainment outlets, office uses, residential dwellings, and community facilities. These uses will be built along a setting that is reminiscent of a traditional "main street' with interesting streetscapes exhibiting individually designed storefronts, wider sidewalks, street furniture, and landscaping including pocket parks. Second story office space will be built above portions of some retail uses to accommodate professional uses (medical/dental offices, accountants, lawyers, etc.). The project includes a variety of sit-down restaurants, cafes, and coffeehouses. The proposed project will include civic and cultural uses that may include a branch library, community play house, pertorming arts theater, or community center. The use of landscaping, awnings, canopies, sun shelters, misting systems and other architectural elements will serve to help shield patrons of the shopping district from extreme weather conditions. The area located between Foothill Boulevard and Victoria Gardens Lane will be developed with fast food uses, automobile service station(s), restaurants, and retail uses. This area will be oriented to vehicle traffic. The area of the Victoria Gardens project, which directly abuts I-15 may be developed with either retail or office/hotel uses. The Victoria Gardens project includes the development of up to 600 multiple-family residential units. These dwelling units were envisioned be located north of the "new downtown," within walking • distance of commercial, public, and civic uses. The residential component of the proposed project may include clubhouse facilities, recreational features, or open space reserved for the exclusive use of project residents. There are currently 310 condominiums built north of the "new downtown". An R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study~section 2 Project Description 9-4-08.doc I ~21 Initial Study for AMENDMENT; -HE VICTORIA GARDENS MAS City of Rancho Cucamonga • additional 290 residential units are approved but not currently built and are the subject of the amendments to the VGMP. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN (AMENDING THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN AND VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN) Forest Cities (applicant) is proposing to amend the approved Victoria Community Plan by amending the Development Agreement DA01-02 to include minor technical and conforming amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan (VGMP) and related documents to allow flexibility to construct the remaining 290 dwelling units and undeveloped commercial office/retail space as approved within the VGMP. The Victoria Arbors Master Plan is proposed to be amended to include references to the VGMP and a General Plan Amendment amending Table III-4 to increase dwelling unit density within the Residential Land Use designation for the Victoria Gardens Regional Mixed Use Lifestyle Center. The amendments are designed to allow for the most efficient use of available land area within the VGMP project area, and to allow for creative and distinctive building design solutions in achieving these goals. Figure 2 shows the land uses that have been built in the VGMP area. The following amendments are proposed Building Height. Increase the overall building height for the Main Street area from the current maximum height limit of 70-feet (except for two 90-foot high "signature buildings") to a new average height of 120-feet and a new maximum height of 160-feet (refer to Figure 3). The purpose of the increased building height is to allow the development of medium-rise (as defined by the California • Building Code 2007) office, residential or mixed use buildings. The increased height would also permit the development of recognizable and architectural landmark building masses that will be seen primarily by motorists on Interstate 15. The area within the VGMP where the anticipated signature buildings could be built is identified in Figure 2. Currently, the applicant envisions up to four signature buildings (including associated parking structures) within the 4000 block expansion at Victoria Gardens. Specific locations will be determined following site development studies and will be brought forward for the review through the Citys regular design review process for projects within the VGMP. Residential Area Standards. A goal of the proposed amendments is to allow residential uses (the remaining 290 units of a total approved 600) within the boundaries of the Main Street area (refer to Figure 1). Currently, residential uses are restricted to the area between Cultural Center Drive and Church Street where Shea Homes is in the process of construction of 310 condominium units. In order to implement the remaining 290 residential units, Section 4.8 of the VGMP will be amended or replaced with the new residential development standards including building height for residential structures (now limited to 3-stories/55 feet), minimum parcel size (3 acres), density (max. 30 dwelling units per acre), parking requirements (based on bedrooms and for guests), private space (100 -150 square feet per unit) and common open space requirements, provision of on-site recreational amenities, building separations, etc. Setbacks. The applicant proposes to amend building setbacks requirements for the Main Street area to allow variation in building to building, and in building to street relationships. The goal is to allow for creative and enhanced streetscapes in certain key situations as they arise. It is not the intention of the applicant to detract from the creation of a strong urban streetscape as envisioned by the VGMP, but to allow for creative spaces or building designs at key situations where the use of Porte cocheres, • porticos, plazas, sitting areas, and similar architectural features would create added visual interest, R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\section 2 Project Description 9-4-08.doc I ~22 i j ~I ~~ 0 0 ^J 0 ^1 ^I nl u ~~ n u i I-^~I, u; uJ u ~- 11-I;u4uu~'-'1 p ~ \o ~ .U +O to ! I a;b.~oriulq; ~ldddr~o !~o;I~.J~ ~'a~o o JJ ,~~~I~o~ CHURCH STREET ~~ UQ ~ ~ . \~~~~ o N ' _J, ! .~~-_J L _ FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66 ~- - ~ _, i a ~ __. %~ ,,; ~: ! a // ~•-_- -~_ IJLLIUUUL(ULT._' 1 ~ooo~om~~q _~ I __~1 _- I IririnMnn ''fib ~ ' KEY: R =RETAIL L = LIBRARY C =CINEMA OS =DEPARTMENT STORE CC = NLTURAL CENTER FH =FOOD HALL PS =PARKING STRUCTURE SFft =SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MFR = MULI l-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPDSED BUILDING PARKING DECK (APPROXIMATE) = POSSIBLE TALLER BUILDING :~,f~,{,y;p, =RETAIL SINGLE BTORV LSA ~I • 0 300 600 Feel SOURCE Gly of Rnnd~o Cucamonga,?008 Amendments to the Victoria CGrdensMasterPlan Imtiol Study Existing Land Uses and Pro Posed Taller Building Sites within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan FIGURE 2 I\CRG08031Repans\IS1EnislingLU mid (09l04Po8) 1-23 CHURCH. STREET '-----_ 1 1 - i ~~ ~ ~ ' A ~ __ ~ RESIDENTIAL REA j~:._ --- ___ -~_,~ , 4 I I (n• \ __ __ ______ 10, '~ 'pr/ (y/'' r,'-- CuINnt Ccn[er Drlv_gjP_r_v_a[e .~ ~ `, ` ~ , j I F°~tNSS:. +q~y ~v. ~ ,if''.`.~, •£;,C`i'-i.~~z. ~. x ~"u~t~ EI C. .'rt/ -; a`° ~ -_- ~u jl ' „'. t . i 'y~'_%' ^"'~6 S' J ~~~,pu~,'~gj,, t I~ ~~w 1, ~ASTERN~~ ;R~EA G'~~ ~ ~ti tea .;~~ri~~,~~tx~~.~ II l I i aav~.v~~ 'k ~N.`a~~. ~ 'I~ xA t£=:.a~. ~,/ -~~ )'Y' / Jig \ „ . . ~~~~d ~n~ ~V~_I~x ' /;^xt~~'~S~~n~Y{~ "'01 } ~}~raix' ~~~~~>~.' + . ~ ~ Y . : = . : P. ~ ~ A --. ~ ~e k :~~>;; \. io ~~ ^' ~ I ¢ t ~ ~ ' '-'~~ ~ ~~ i ~ .~ Iwl ~: ' I' ~I ;~~~'j:,i im, r .., ~ a n ' li r _ tee. x ® ~a 5 l c`¢ - ~Vtctvria Gar-dams=Lane--- __ - ~~- - ` _ _ -~iF-` ~ {'--'i ~ L ~--I i- . ~. % fit, .~~ " iii ~ Ff / . = f - _ ' N,:_o ~ I i'_R.~O_U~IT-~5~6 :AR:E.~q °~-~%'" . 1, ~ ~ K~ 90' Max. Height Limit 2 I ill '=f'-~1~ ' v~~~~ %~ ', ,:, - ¢ ~ ~~ r 120' Average Height ¢ ' II j i ~ i~ ~` ;( ~ , ~^,~ ~1~ , ( _v ~ ~'i w/160' Max. Limn ` - FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ROUTE 66-- - - i I Proposetl Helght Limns LSA >\~ 0 300 600 ~~ Feer $OURCH' Ory of Rancho Cucamonga,?008 FIGURE 3 • Amendments to the Victoria Gardens Master Plan • Initial Study Proposed Building Height Restrictions within the Victoria Gardens Master Plan I \CRGOS01\ReponsU$1Hcighl Rcsvuaiens,m~d (09104/08) ~ -24 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-4 • r 1 L J ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially be affected by this project, involving at least one impact that indicates there is a "Substantial Change in Project Requiring Major EIR Revisions", there is a "Substantial Change in Circumstance Requiring Major'EIR Revisions" or there is "Information Showing Greater Significant Effects Than Evaluated In The Previous EIR" as indicated by the checklist on uic wnvvru iy (~) Aesthetics ()Biological Resources ()Hazards & Hazardous Materials ( )Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities/Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources ()Cultural Resources () Hydrology/Water Quality ()Noise ()Recreation (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance (/) Air Quality ()Geology/Soils ()Land Use/Planning ()Population/Housing ( ) Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to by, the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact' or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. () The City firids that changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project would be undertaken require major revisions to the previous EIR in order to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the proposed project in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15163. Thus, a SUBSEQUENT EIR shall be prepared. (/) The City finds that changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project would be • undertaken require only minor revision to the previous EIR in order to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the proposed project in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15163. Thus, a SUPPLEMENTAL EIR shall be prepared. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -25 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-5 () The City finds that the slgn'rficant effects that would result from the proposed project have been addressed in an earlier EIR, and that none of the determinations set forth in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 can be established. Thus, an ADDENDUM to a Victoria. Gardens Master. Plan Final Environmental Impaq Report will be prepared. Prepared By: /~~ Date: q''~' Q'~ A ssoaates In~~~lr~l-- 9/y/o ~ Reviewed By: Date: R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensNndial Stutly,Secllon 3 checklist 9-04-08.dx L J u • I -26 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-16 • Iniormahon Shovnnp Less then Issues and Supporting Information Greeter sipnlfignt New mipm,ahon Sipnlpwnt ImpacVNo Sources: Substantial Substenflal EHeds Showing Ablliry Changes or Chenpe in Change In Than to Retluce. Cut New Prged Irwmsfenca Evaluafetl not Eliminate Iniomlation Reeulnnp RepulnnB In lha Sipnifcant Ra9ulnnp Malor EIR btajw EIR Prewws EHec1s In PreparaLOn of Revisions ReWSims EIR PreWOUS EIR an EIR No Impact c) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Inlormation Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please see response to 3.b) above. Currently, the Basin is in nonattainment for three criteria pollutants: ozone, PM,o and PMZ.s. As the proposed project was included in the Final EIR PM,p analysis and the project will comply with dust control measures of the SCAQMD, the proposed project would have no greater emission impacts than those previously analyzed in the VGMP Final EIR. The projected 57,312 vehicle trips associated with the VGMP would also apply for the proposed project as no additional uses or square footage is proposed. As the proposed project was included in the VGMP Final EIR operational analysis and the project will comply with mitigation measures of the SCAQMD, the proposed project would have no greater emission impacts than those previously analyzed in the VGMP Final EIR. Further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. • d) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please see response to 3.b) above. On-site grading and construction activities will likely generate temporarily increased levels of particulates and emissions from construction equipment. Subsequent to construction, an increase in air emissions will occur as a result of increased traffic volumes associated with operation of the proposed on-site uses. The closest single-family homes are directly north and adjacent to the project site and considered to be receptors sensitive to air emissions generated during the construction and operation of the proposed on-site uses. It should be noted that the 310 dwelling units constructed on the northern portion of the VGMP project site would also be considered sensitive receptors exposed to increased levels of particulates and emissions resulting from construction equipment. However, the distance between the general areas depicted in previously referenced Figure 3, that are part of the proposed project, are farther than the distance to sensitive receptors (existing single-family residences adjacent and to the north) identified in the VGMP Final EIR. Thus, the analysis provided in the VGMP Final EIR is the most conservative analysis. As the proposed project was included in the VGMP Final EIR PMip analysis and the project will comply with dust control measures of the SCAQMD, the proposed project would have no greater emission impacts than those previously analyzed in the VGMP Final EIR. The projected 57,312 vehicle trips associated with the VGMP would also apply for the proposed project as no additional uses or square footage is proposed. As the proposed project was included in the VGMP Final EIR operational analysis and the project will comply with mitigation measures of the SCAQMD, the proposed project would have no greater emission impacts than those previously analyzed in the VGMP Final EIR. Further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. e) Less Than Significant ImpacdNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. During construction, diesel-powered vehicles and equipment in use on the site would create odors. Additionally, the application of architectural coatings and installation of asphalt may generate odors. These odors are temporary and not likely to be noticeable beyond the project boundaries. SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113 identify standards regarding the application of asphalt and architectural coatings, respectively. Land uses generally associated with long-term objectionable odors include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, .chemical plants, composting operations, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding facilities. The proposed project does not include land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable long- term odors. Adherence to the standards identified in the SCAQMD Rules 1108 and 1113 would reduce temporary odor impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -27 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-17 IMOmahon Showlnp less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater Slgnlficent New Informehon Signlfcant Impact/No Sources: Substen0al Substanhel EHeds snowing Adlity Changes or Change in Chenga In Than to Retluce, but Naw ProieG varmstance Evaluated not Ellminete Information Requmnp Raquldng In the 9pmfcam Raquinng Major EIR Major EIR Prewous EHeccs m Preparatlan of Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR an EIR Na Impact the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. Substantial Change in Circumstance Requiring Major EIR Revisions. It is important to note that Assembly Bill 1493 (AB 1493), Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), Senate Bill 1368 (SB 1368), and Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) have been adopted by the State of California since the adoption of the Final EIR for the VGMP in 2001. AB 1493, AB 32, SB 1368, and SB 97 encourage the analysis of a project's greenhouse gas emissions and contribution to global climate change. Currently, there are no thresholds established at the State or federal level for greenhouse gas emissions. Because the Final EIR for the VGMP did not analyze the VGMP's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change, the Supplemental EIR will include an analysis of the proposed project contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Mitigation Measures from the Final ElR Short-Term Construction 4.3.1 A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used on site based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1 B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel powered equipment in lieu of gasoline powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1 C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1 D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as not to intertere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1 E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1 F. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • I ~28 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-18 • Information Shomng Less Nan Issues and Supporting Information Greater s~grofi~nt Naw Infannatim S,gnificant ImpagMo Sources: Suhstanoat Substarmal EHeds Shomng pbu,ty Changes or Change m Change In Than to RaEUce, bin New Prgen ,rwmstance Evaluatetl not Eliminate Information Requinng Requiring In the S~grvficam Requinng Melor EIR Maly EIR PreNaus EHeas m Preparation of Rawvons Revisions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials, and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. 4.3.1 G. The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water based or low VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as a high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual. Long-Term Operation • 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations or City requirements regarding energy conservation standards. 4.3.26. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM), such as preferential parking for vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy far transit pass or vanpooling/carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and on-site cafeteria, shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. 4.3.2C. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to prewire houses for electrical charging EV cars, if feasible. and/or fiber optics for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or fiber optics per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Install conduits for fiber optics for residential and non-residential uses. 4.3.2D. Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s). 4.3.2E. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance with and implementation of the mitigation monitoring program. Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new potentially significant impacts associated with the proposed project related to air quality. However, impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change will be analyzed further in the Supplemental EIR. Refined project mitigation measures may be identified in the Supplemental EIR. • Environmental Determinations Ma%or EIR Revisions Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, no new potentially significant impacts were identified related air quality. However, because the VGMP R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens~nitial Siudy\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -29 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-19 InfarmaHOn Shovnng Less Nan Greater New SigNfcarn Issues and Supporting Information slgNHCent INwmatlm Impap/Na Sources: SubstarroN Subatantlal EHaps Showing nbiGry Changes or Change In Change In Than to Reduce, but New Prgeq rwmstanra Evaluated not Ehminete InfomtaLOn Requidnq Raquldng In Na SlgNfirara Ragwdng Malor EIR Meior EIR Prewoua Effects In Preparelian of Ransions Rewsitxv5 EIR Previous EIR an EIR No ImpeC Final EIR did not identify the proposed project's contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change, EIR revisions are required to adequately analyze the impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change for the proposed project. The Supplemental EIR will adequately analyze air quality impacts resulting from the proposed project related to greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change. Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Ma/or EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. As described above, because the VGMP Final EIR did not analyze the proposed project's greenhouse gas emissions and contribution to global climate change; therefore, EIR revisions are required. The VGMP did not analyze the project's contribution to greenhouse gases and global climate change pursuant to the adoption of AB 1493, AB 32, SB 1368, and SB 97. The Supplemental EIR will adequately analyze air quality impacts resulting from the proposed project related to greenhouse gas emissions and global climate change. , No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that significant effects would result from the VGMP with respect to short-term construction emissions and Tong-term operational emissions. The mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR did not reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Impacts resulting from the VGMP with respect to short-term construction and long-term operation emissions would remain significant even with implementation of mitigation. The proposed project does not include new information that would reduce significant effects identified in the VGMP Final EIR. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc • • • 130 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-20 • • • Infomabw Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater slgnuwnt New Inlonnatiw Significant Impaa/No Sources: SufxwNa! Subetentiel EHetSS Showing AbOry Changes or Change In Change In Than m Retluce, dA New Prged rwmstenw Evaluata0 not Efimineta Information Regmnng Repumng In the Significant Repmnng Malor EIR Maly EIR Prewous Efleas in Preparation of Revisions Revisions EIR Prev,ous EIR an EIR No Impact 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, () (') () () () (/) sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, () () () () () (/) policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not () () () () () (/) limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident () () () () () (/) or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological () () () () () (/) resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community () () () () () (/) conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? R:\CRG01303_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -31 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-21 Information Showing Less Nan Greeter New S1gniHram Issues and Supporting Information slgnlHCam Impmwdon ImpacVNo Sources: Substantal Substantial EHeds Showing Abillry Changes or Change in Change in Then to Reduce, bn New ProjetY iramstance Evaluated not Ellmnate Information Requlnnq Raqulnnp In Ne Signlfieem Regmnnp Mapr EIR Major EIR Previous Effects in Preparahan of Revivons Rewslans EIR Prewous EIR an EIR No Impact Resoonses- a) No.lmpact. The proposed project site is located in an urbanized area where partial construction of the VGMP has occurred. The project site has been developed and paved over with parking lots, roadways, and structures, thus no habitat areas occur on the project site. Due to the absence of any habitat on-site, the project site does not support any special status plant or animal species designated by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) or United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Therefore, no impacts would occur with implementation of the proposed project. tr-c) No Impact. As previously identified, the project site has been developed and paved over, thus no jurisdictional waters or riparian habitat is present on the site. No impacts would occur. d) No Impact. According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, wildlife movement on a regional basis has ceased due to development on the valley floor. The City is mostly developed and the adjacent open areas are quickly becoming developed and expanding into the sphere of influence. Most land has been converted from open space areas to commercial, industrial, residential, and recreational uses. Furthermore, the majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby already disrupting the movement of species and any wildlife corridors that may have existed in the area. No adverse impacts would occur related to the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or with the use of native wildlife nursery sites. e) No Impact. As previously identified, the project site has been developed and paved over, thus no activities would occur that would conflict with adopted policies ,or ordinances protecting biological resources. Therefore, no impacts are associated with this issue would occur. f) No Impact. According to the Cites General Plan Exhibit IV-4, "Open Space and Conservation Plan," the site is not within any adopted habitat conservation plan areas. Thus, no impacts associated with this issue would result from project implementation. Mitigation Measures from the Final E!R The VGMP Final EIR did not include mitigation measures related to biological resources. Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project; therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to biological resources. Environmental Determinations Major EIR Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • • 132 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-22 C~ Inlomaaon Shoving Less than Greater New S~gMLrant Issues and Supporting Information $,gnhcent Inlvrmaaon ImvactMo Source. Substen0el Substen9el EHeUS Showing Pbihry Changes or Change In Change in Than to Re0uce, but New Prgea ircumstence EveluateC not Eliminate Inlormatlon Requlnng Ragmnng In the Sgmficant Requinng Malor EIR Malor EIR Previous ENects in PrepareLOn of Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impaa the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to biological resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substanflal Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EfR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. • No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to biological resources. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to biological resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Vlctoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc I ~33 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-23 In7pmu4m ShowlnB Less Nen Greater New Sipkfcem Issues and Supporting Information 3~gNHceM Inlonnauon ImpacVNo SOUrces: - Substen0al Substannel EHeds Showing Ability Changes or Chenpe In Chenpe In Then tp Reduce, but New Prpjatt vwnatance Evaluated not Eliminate IMO~matlan Repulnnp Repuinnp In the S,grvfiwM Repuinnp Mapr EIR Melor EIR Previous EHeas m Preparation of Rewvons Ravislons EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse () () () () () (/ ) change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an () () () () (/) ( ) archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a () () () () (/) ( ) unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, () () () () () (/) including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Resoonses: a) No Impact. The proposed project site is located in a developed area where significant ground disturbance has occurred along with placement of infrastructure, roadways, and nearby structures. The project site has been developed and paved over, thus no historical resources currently occur on the project site. The Final EIR for the VGMP indicated that a records search conducted for the project site did not identify any cultural resources that would be affected by project implementation. Further, the Final EIR for the VGMP also indicates that areas of the project site have been surveyed and all historical resources have been identified and determined to be ineligible for listing in the California Register or for designation as a Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark. Therefore, no impacts to historical resources would occur with implementation of the proposed project. b) Less Than Significant ImpacdNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The VGMP Final EIR indicated that there are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site. The Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans, according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). While the site is located in a developed area where significant ground disturbance has occurred along with placement of infrastructure, roadways, and nearby structures, the potential to uncover an archaeological resource is low. Hence, construction activity, particularly grading and soil excavation, would not adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18) the City of Rancho Cucamonga has notified the potentially affected Native American Tribes of the proposed amendments to the General Plan and requested consultation regarding cultural resources within the project area. The results of the consultation are pending. R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensUnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc • • u 134 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-24 • Intormanan Showing Less than sues and Su ortin Information I Greater New Signllicant s - pp 9 Significant Informanon ImpacVNO Souroes: Substanbel Substantlal EXens Shovnng Ablhry Changes a Change in Change in Than to Reduce, bul New Prged~ nwmstance Evaluatetl not Ehnunata Irdonnanon Regmnng Regmnng In the Slgnifimrt Requinng Maior EIR Malmo EIR Prewaus EHecss In Preparation of Revisions Revisions EIR Previws EIR en EIR No ImpaC Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and turther analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. I~ c.) Less Than Significant ImpacbNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As identified in the General Plan Final EIR (Section 5.11), older alluvium is considered to have a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources and may have vertebrate fossils. However, most alluvial deposits are non-fossiliferous, rendering these sediments a very low paleontological potential overall. The General Plan Final EIR states that no paleontological resources have been recorded from the area that is within the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the sphere of influence. Additionally, as the project site is located in an area containing extensive existing development, the development of the existing roadways, curbs, sidewalks, infrastructure, and nearby structures would have required a large amount of ground disturbance that would have likely resulted in the discovery of or destruction of existing paleontological resources. While there have been no paleontological resources recorded within the City and the project area has previously been disturbed, the potential to uncover a paleontological resource is low. Further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. d.) No Impact. The VGMP Final EIR indicated that a records search and field survey did not identify any cultural resources that would be altered by the development. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. As discussed in response 5(b), the local Native American Tribes were notified of the project as required by SB 18. The results of the consultation are pending. If human remains are discovered on the site, no further disturbance should occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code § 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner should notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which should determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the land owner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of discovery. The MLD should complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. The MLD may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American Burials. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no additional mitigation measures would be required in the unlikely event that human remains were discovered on the site. Impacts associated with this issue would be considered less than significant. Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR The VGMP Final EIR did not include mitigation measures related to cultural resources. • Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project; therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to cultural resources. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc 135 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-25 IrHartna9on Shovnng Less Men Greater New Significant Issues and Supporting Information slgnlfiwnt Imorma4on ImpacuNo Sources: aaCSidn481 Substantial EHeds Sharing Pbility Changesw Change in Change in Then to Ratluce, but Naw Prged rwmstance Evalua[etl nw E4Mnate Informatlan Repuinng Requlnn9 In Me Sigmfiwnt ReQUlnng Maior EIR Malw EIR Previws EHeas In Prepare4on of Rensims RBVISId1a EIR Previws EIR en EIR No Impact Environmental Determinations Major EIR Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to cultural resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to cultural resources. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to cultural resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc • • • I -36 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-26 • • Infortnatlon Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater signircant New Inlormauon Significant ImpacVNo SOUrces: Substantial Suhstenhal Effects Showing Abiliry Changes or Change in Change m Than to Retluce. Out New Projetl eamstence EvalueteC not Eliminate InlormeLOn Raqulnng RequidnB In the 9gmf¢ant Regmnng Malor EIR Malor EIR Previous EHeas m Preparaftan of Revisions Rewsions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impat% 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State () () () () () (/) Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground () () () () (/) ( ) shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () () (/) ( ) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or () () () () (/) ( ) the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in () () () () (/) ( ) on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the . Uniform Building Code (1994), () () () () () (/) creating substantial risks to life or property? R:\CRG0803_Vlctoria GardensUnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc 137 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-27 Information Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater sivmtimnt New Information Signlfwm ImpacVNq Sources. Substanbel Substantial EHeas Showing Abllay Changes or Chanpa in Changa In Than to Retluce, bn New Prgea iranutence Eveluatetl not Eliminate Inlormetion Regmnnp Raqulnng In Me Signifiamt Repmnng Major EIR Major EIR Previous ENeas In Preparation of Revisions Rawsims EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impap e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal () () () () () (~) systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Responses• a(i) No Impact. As determined in the VGMP Initial Study, no known faults pass through the project site, nor is the site located within an Alquist-Priolo Fault Zone. Based on the General Plan Exhibit V-1 and General Plan Final EIR, the project site is not located within the City- designated Special Study Zone established for the Red Hill Fautt. As the stte is not located within any designated fault hazard zone, no fault rupture hazards impacts would occur. Therefore, no further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. a(ii) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As determined in the VGMP Initial Study, the Red Hill Fault is located within 1.5 miles to the north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2.6 miles to the north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing magnitude 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Additionally, the San Jacinto Fault, which is capable of producing up to magnitude 7.5 earthquakes, is 9 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to magnitude 8.2 earthquakes, is 12 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and other City standards would ensure that ground shaking hazards impacts would be reduced to an acceptable level of risk, resulting in a less than significant impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. a(iii) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. According to the General Plan (Figure V-4) and General Plan EIR (Figure III- C/2), only one area (at the base of Red Hill) in the City has been identified as being susceptible to liquefaction. As the project site is not located within this area, the potential for liquefaction hazard is considered low. For this reason, impacts related to liquefaction or any other seismic-related ground failures are considered less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. a(iv) No Impact. As identified in the VGMP Initial Study, the project site is not located within an area characterized by steep slopes. Because of the location of the site, the absence of adjacent hillsides, and the presence of adjacent development, no landslide impact would result from the construction or operation/occupation of the proposed site. Therefore, no further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. b) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As identified in the VGMP Initial Study, development'of the proposed uses would require the movement of on-site soils, which may lead to off-site sedimentation. On-site R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc, • u • I -38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-28 tL~ Inipmiabon Shovnng Less Nan Issues and Supporting Information Greater S~gNfWnt Naw Information SipNilws ImpeWNo Sources: aubstanbal Substantial EHeOS Showing Ablllry Changes or Change In Cnanpe in Then tp Ratluce, bm New Prgep vwmstance Evaluates npt Ellminata Intartnaban Reawhnp Requmng In the SipNfipnt Repmrinq Major EIR Malor EIR Pravrws EMects In Preparaum of Revisions Ransims EIR Premaus EIR en EIR No Impaq soils (Tujunga association) have a slight potential for erosion. The proposed project would be required to adhere to applicable provisions of the Citys National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, including the submittal of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) including the implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address erosion and discharge impacts associated with the proposed on-site grading, resulting in a less than significant impact. From September to April, the Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown soil, resulting in temporary impacts associated with dust. Adherence to the standard fugitive dust control measures (SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403) would reduce wind erosion impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. • c) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from an underlying aquifer. As identified in the VGMP Initial Study, the proposed project does not involve the extraction of subsurface liquids. The proposed project will alter the geologic/seismic environment of the project site by adding commercial and residential structures in a seismically active region of Southern California; however, potential landslide, liquefaction, lateral spreading, or subsidence impacts will be no greater than that identified in the Citys General Plan. The proposed project does not include wells or other uses that would withdraw groundwater. According to the General Plan, the site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type; therefore, a less than significant impact associated with an unstable geologic unit or soil (landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse) would occur and no further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. d) No Impact. The majority of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. Soil types on the project site consist of Tujunga Loamy Sands and Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand. These soils are typically excessively drained on nearly level to moderately sloping soils and are not considered to be expansive. No adverse impact would occur. Therefore, no further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. e) No Impact. The proposed project would connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system. The proposed project does not include the installation of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems; therefore, no impact related to this issue would occur. Therefore, no further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. • Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR The VGMP Final EIR did not include mitigation measures related to geology and soils. R:\CRG0803_Vlctoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc 139 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-29 Informatlm Showing Less then Issues and Supporting Information Greater SigNHCant New IMOrmatlon SlgNlltsM ImpeclMo Sources: Substansal Substarrtal Effects Showing PDllity Changes a Change in Change In Than to Retluce. bin New PrgeG Iramstance Evaluatatl nol Eliminero Infom~aHan Reaulring Reomnng In tha SigniLCent Regmnng Malor EIR Maior Elfl Previous Effects in Preparation d Reviaons Rensions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impap Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project; therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to geology and soils. Environmental Determinations Major EIR Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to geology and soils resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. , • No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate • that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects !n the Final E-R. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to geology and soils. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to geology and soils resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Inltial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-43 tnfortnahon Shawing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater Significant New Information Significant ImpacVNo Sources: Substanaal SubstanLel Effects Showing Ablliry Changes or Change in Change in Than to Ratluce, bin Naw Prgea rwmsiance Evaluafetl not ELminete Information Requring Repumng In the SgnlfiraM Requinng Mator EIR Major EIR Previous EHeas In Preperalipn of Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impaa information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to mineral resources. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to mineral resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. • • R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I-41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-44 Informetlon Showing Less than Greeter New SignihoaM Issues and Supporting Information signlbpm Information ImpedMo $OUfCBS: SuCStentlal Suostenbel Effects Showlnp Abiliy Changes or Change in Change In Than to Reduce, M4 New Prolad vamstance Eveluatetl nat Elimmete Information Requinng Requlnng In the Signifcem Requlnng Major EIR Major EIR Previous Etleds m Preperebon of Revlsons Revislona EIR Previous EIR en EIR No Impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in () () () () (/) ( ) the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () () (/) ( ) groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the () () () () (/) ( ) project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in () () () () (/) ( ) the project vicinity above levels ' existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or () () () () () (/) public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project () () () () () (/) expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Responses: a) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As previously identified, the VGMP consists of 2.4 million square feet of Commercial/Office uses, 90,850 square feet of Civic uses, and 600 dwelling units. A portion of the VGMP has already been built and consists of approximately 1,413,383 square feet of Commercial/Office uses, 90,850 square feet of Civic uses, 310 dwelling units, and associated infrastructure and is considered the baseline condition. The VGMP Final EIR analyzed the projected noise impacts for all the VGMP uses. The proposed project would result in an additional 18,800 square feet of Commercial/Office uses within the Main Street area as identified in Table 2.A. The additional 18,800 square feet of CommerciaVOffice uses are the result of the transfer of square footage reduced from Commercial/Office uses within the Route 66 and Eastern areas of the VGMP and is still R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensUnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc • • I -42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-45 IMOrmation Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information greater SI nlhcant New InlormaUOn si~fiwnt Im cUNp Sources: Substantial Substantial EHerts Sho+nng Ability Changes or Change In Change m Than to ReEUCa, but New Prgact ommstance Evaluatetl nrn E6Mnate Intotmabon Re9ulnn9 Repmnng In me SigNfirar,t Repuidng Major EIR Mapr EIR Prewous EHeRS In Preparation of Revisions Rewvons EIR Prawous EIR an EIR No Impact within the total square footage amount approved for the entire VGMP. Similarly, the proposed project conforms to the description of uses anticipated in the VGMP project in terms of dwelling units (600 units, of which 310 have been built) and does not alter or add dwelling units to the maximum allowable dwelling units previously approved. As discussed within the Project Description (Chapter 2.0), the addition of the proposed project's square footage and number of dwelling units to the existing baseline condition square footage and number of dwelling units for the VGMP would not exceed the maximum amount already approved. Short-term noise impacts generated from grading and construction equipment as well as noise generated from workers' vehicles will contribute to a temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site. Long-term impacts consist of noise typically generated by the daily operation of the proposed commercial, office, and residential uses. As addressed within the VGMP Final EIR, the noise effects of the proposed project have been divided into two categories: construction activity noise impacts and operational noise impacts. Construction Noise. As described in the VGMP Final EIR, construction of the proposed • project is expected to require the use of earthmovers, bulldozers, and water and pickup trucks. Noise typically associated with the use of construction equipment is estimated between 79 and 89 dBA Lma>< at a distance of 50 feet from the construction effort for the grading phase. The maximum noise level generated by each earthmover on the proposed project site is assumed to be 88 dBA Lmax at 50 feet from the earthmover. Each bulldozer would also generate 88 dBA Lmax at 50 feet. The maximum noise level generated by water and pickup trucks is approximately 86 dBA Lma, at 50 feet from these vehicles. Each doubling of the sound sources with equal strength increases the noise level by 3 dBA. Assuming that each piece of construction equipment operates as an individual noise source, the worst case composite noise level during this phase of construction would be 91 dBA Lma„ at a distance of 50 feet from an active construction area. This level of noise is comparable with vehicular traffic noise on Church Street. Construction related noise impacts of the proposed project would be potentially adverse; however, with the implementation of applicable mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR, the impact would be reduced to a less than ,significant level. To minimize the impact of the construction noise on residences adjacent to the project area, compliance with the City's Noise Control Ordinance would be required. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. Operational Noise. Noise increases from the proposed project would be generated from operational uses including loading/unloading noise and traffic noise. Project-related long-term vehicular trip increases are anticipated to be moderate; however, proposed on-site residential uses could be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the exterior noise standard of 70 dBA t-0p and interior noise standard of 45 dBA Ldn. . As described in the VGMP Final EIR, the on-site noise generating activities closest to sensitive uses would be from the loading/unloading activities associated with the proposed retail stores. The closest loading dock to the residences on the project site is at a distance of approximately 250 feet. Based on noise readings from loading and R:\CRG0603_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-46 Infwmatiw Showing Less then Issues and Supporting Information Greater sgnitiwnt New Inlprmauon Sgnibpnt Impaa/Na SOUrces: Substantial Substanbal EHects RhowinB ~iliry Changes or Change m Change In Than to Retluca, bta Naw Projetl ramslance Evaluatetl not Eliminate Inlomiation Repairing Repumng In Na SignificeM Repuinng Malmo EIR Mapr EIR Prewous ENeas In Preparation of Rewsiws Rewsions EIR Prewws EIR an EIR No Impact unloading activities for other similar projects, a noise level of 75 dBA Lmax at 50 feet was used in this analysis. The noise attenuation of loading/unloading activities, provided by distance divergence at 250 feet, is approximately 14 dBA compared to the level at 50 feet. Therefore, residences of the project site would be exposed to loading/unloading noise levels of 61 dBA Lma,. This noise level exceeds the nighttime Lma, of 60 dBA (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) from commercial activities specified in Section 17.10.050 of the Citys Performance Standards; therefore, mitigation is required. With implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Finial EIR for the VGMP, loading/unloading noise impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. The VGMP Final EIR identifies that traffic noise under future (2020) baseline conditions would range from moderate to high in the project vicinity. Projected traffic noise along I- 15, Day Creek Boulevard, Base Line Road, and Foothill Boulevard is high, whereas projected traffic noise along Rochester Avenue, Victoria Gardens Lane (Victoria Parks Lane), Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street is moderate. There is a significant increase in project related traffic rioise on Victoria Gardens Lane (Victoria Parks Lane) from Base Line Road to south of Church Street. Therefore, mitigation measures are required to ensure that the sensitive receptor locations of the proposed project are not exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the Citfls standards. Depending on the location of the units, mitigation measures may be required. The general areas of potential residential development of the proposed project are depicted in previously referenced Figure 3. These potential residences are located within the 60 and 65 dBA highway noise contours identified in Exhibit V=13 of the Cit)rs General Plan (approximately 500 feet west of I-15). For the potential sensitive receptors of the proposed project that would be built in the general areas depicted in Figure 3, there are two types of traffic noise impacts that require measures to reduce the noise level: Group B: Group B includes areas that would be exposed to traffic noise between 65 and 70 dBA Ldn. Residential units with active outdoor use areas exposed to the traffic noise would require a freestanding sound wall or sound wall and berm combination with an effective height of six feet above grade along the property line. This six foot sound wall or sound wall/berm combination would provide 5 dBA or more in noise reduction for ground floor receptors when the direct line of sight to the traffic is blocked. With windows closed interior noise level in ground floor units would be 45 dBA Ldn or lower. Therefore, no building facade upgrades would be required. However, with windows open, there is a potential for interior noise in the ground floor units to exceed the 45 dBA Ldn standard (e.g., 60 dBA - 12 dBA = 48 dBA). Therefore, an air conditioning system, a form of mechanical ventilation, should be provided to ensure that windows can remain closed for a prolonged period of time. For second story and above bedrooms exposed to 65 to 70 dBA Ldn traffic noise, the six foot sound wall would not provide sufficient noise mitigation. Therefore, second story and above bedrooms with windows exposed to the traffic noise require building facade upgrades, such as double paned or dual glazing windows or other noise-attenuating materials with a minimum of STC-30. In addition, an air conditioning system, a form of mechanical ventilation, would be required. Additionally, for second story and, above R:\CRG0803_VIC10rla Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • u • I.44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-47 C~ Inbrmahan - Shovnng Less man Issues and Supporting Information Greater sgnificant New Intormat,on SigNLCaM Impad/No Sources: SuCStenaal SuMtenael EHac1s Shomng AMliry Changes or Change In Change in Than to Reduce, lM New Prgea rwrrutance Evaluate0 not Eliminate INarmagan Requinn9 Reoulnng In me Sgndmaa Repmnng Mapr EIR Malar EIR Prenous Effects in Preparatlon of Rewsons Rawvons EIR Prewws EIR an EIR No ImpeC bedrooms included in the proposed project that would face I-15, building facade upgrades such as installation of noise-attenuating sound barriers to attenuate noise will be required. There is also the possibility that balconies on the building side facing I-15 will not be constructed. Group C: Areas that would be exposed to traffic noise between 57 and 65 dBA Ldn. Residential homes that fall within this category do not require mitigation measures far their outdoor active use areas, such as backyards or barbecue areas. Standard building construction for residential structures in Southern California would provide a minimum of 20 dBA in noise reduction from outdoors to indoors, with windows closed. However, with windows open, this outdoors to indoors noise reduction drops to 12 dBA. Therefore, Group C homes would potentially experience interior noise levels exceeding the 45 dBA Ldn (e.g., 60 dBA - 12 dBA = 48 dBA) standard adopted by the State of California when windows are open. Mitigation measures, such as an air conditioning system, a form of mechanical ventilation, should be provided to ensure that windows can remain closed for a prolonged period of time. No building facade upgrades would be required. - With implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR for the VGMP, • traffic noise impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. b) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As described in the VGMP Initial Study, bulldozers and other heavy-tracked construction equipment generate approximately 92 velocity decibels (Vd6)s of groundborne vibration when measured at 50 feet from the source a This level of groundborne vibration exceeds the threshold of human perception, which is around 65 VdB. According to Caltrans,' every doubling of distance from 50 feet results in the reduction of the vibration level by 6 VdB. In other words, the vibration level at 100 feet is approximately 6 Vd6 lower than the vibration level at 50 feet and vibration at 200 feet from the source is more than 6 VdB lower than the vibration level at 100 feet. Thus, sensitive receptors at 100 and 200 feet from the construction activity may be exposed to groundborne vibration up to 86 and 80 VdB, respectively. A group of existing residences located approximately 425 feet to the northwest of the nearest structure proposed on the project site would be exposed to a maximum groundborne vibration level of approximately 74 VdB, which exceeds the threshold of human perception. The frequency of how often bulldozers would be near the residential tract would be short-term and, therefore, less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. • s Although not a universally accepted notation, the acronym for velocity decibels (VdBs) is used to reduce the potential for confusion vnth sound decibels. a Office of Planning, Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, prepared by Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc., Washington, D.C., April 7995. ' Caltrans. Transportation-Related Earthbome Vibration, Technical Advisory, prepared by Rudy Hendricks, July 24, 1992. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I ~45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-48 Inlormatlon ShowlnB Less than Greeter New SigNgcant Issues and Supporting Information slgrurcant Irdpnneum Impad/Np Sources: $ubstaneel SuCStanael EHecfs Sho.Wnp Pblbry Changes w Chenpe In Chenpa In Then tp Reouoe, b,n New Project Irwmstenpe Eveluefeo nd EliMnate Information Reguidnp Repulnng In the SiBNhwM Rawlnnp MaIw EIR Major EIR Prewws EHeds In Prepamaon of Rewslore Revisions EIR Previws EIR r» EIR No Impact c) Less Than Significant ImpacdNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please see response 11 a). Long-term noise impacts including loading/unloading noise and traffic noise can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The proposed project will be required to comply with mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. d) Less Than Significant ImpacbNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please see response 11 a). Short-term noise impacts including grading and construction activities can be mitigated to a less than significant level. The proposed project will be required to comply with mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. e) No Impact. As identified in the VGMP Initial Study, the VGMP is located approximately 4.25 miles northeast of Ontario International Airport and is not within an airport land use plan or overtlight zone. No impact associated with this issue is anticipated. No further analysis of this issue in the Supplemental EIR is required. f) No Impact. As identified in the VGMP Initial Study, the VGMP is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. No impact associated with this issue is anticipated. No further analysis of this issue in the Supplemental EIR is required. Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR 4.2.1 A. Construction shall be limited to the hours of 6:30 a.m. through 8:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday, excluding national holidays. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays. 4.2.16. There shall be proper muffling of and maintenance of all internal combustion engines for construction equipment and vehicles used on the site. 4.2.1 C. All stationary noise generating sources, such as air compressors and portable power generators, shall be located as far away as possible from existing sensitive receptors. 4.2.2A. Residential units located within 86 to 172 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard shall be equipped with building facade upgrades, such as double paned (or dual glazing) windows, and mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.28. Residential units located within 364 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard or within 99 feet of the centerline of Church Street shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. _ R \CRG0803_Vicioda GardensUnitial StudytSection 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -46 • C~ • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-49 • Informetron Showing Less than Issues and Su ortin Information pp g Greater Sigmfwnl New IntormaLan Sgnif,~ant ImpeclMo Sources: SubstenYel Substantlal EXecls Showing Abi6ry Changes or Change in Change in Than to Retluce, but New Prgep ewmstance Evaluetetl not Eliminate Information Requmng Regmring In the Sgnihant Requiring Major EIR Major EIR Previous Effects in Preparation of Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR en EIR No Impap 4.2.3A. On-site residences located within 250 feet of any loading dock shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. 4.2.3B. In accordance with City Code Section 17.10.050 of the Performance Standards, no loading or unloading activities, including truck idling shall occur between the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. within 250 feet of any residential development. Refined Project Mitigation Measures 4.2.28. Residential units located within 364 feet of the centerline of Day Creek Boulevard or within 1,321 feet of the centerline of I-15 shall be equipped with mechanical ventilation, such as an air conditioning system. Additionally, residences facing I-15 shall also include noise-attenuating sound barriers (e.g., double-paned or dual glazing windows) to further reduce traffic related noises from I-15. Environmental Determinations • Major EIR Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to noise resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to noise. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to noise resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is riot applicable. r~ I•..J R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-0408.doc I -47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-50 Inbrmation Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greeter slgmran, New mmrmabon Sigmbcant ImpecVNo SOUrces: Substantial Substerroal EHecls Showing Pbiliry Changes or Change in Change in Than to Retluce, but New Prged ircumstenoe Evaluated not Eliminate Inbnnaban Reqmnng Requinng In the SgnKrant Requlnng Major EIR Major EIR Previous EBeLtis in PreparaUOn of Revisions Revisions EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new () () () () () (/) homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the () () () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Responses• a) No Impact. The residential component of the proposed project consists of 290 dwelling units in the general areas identified in previously referenced Figure 3. As indicated in the Initial Study for the VGMP, a total of 600 residential units (310 units have been constructed) have been analyzed in the Victoria Community Plan EIR; therefore, any increase in population has already been anticipated by SCAG because the development of 290 dwelling units associated with the proposed project has been accounted for in the VGMP Final EIR. No impact related to local or regional population projections will occur. In addition, the commercial portion of this project has been forecasted in the Citys General Plan (November 2001). The development will contribute to continued growth and development of the immediate area. Any required infrastructure improvements will be paid on a fair-share basis by the new development that benefits from these facilities. The proposed project will not serve as an inducement for new residential development in the area beyond that predicted in the General Plan and VGMP. Growth related impacts will not occur with this proposed project. No further analysis of this issue in the Supplemental EIR is required. b) No Impact. The project site has been developed and paved over with parking lots, roadways, and structures. Existing housing within the project limits are located on the northern portion of the site as depicted in previously referenced Figure 3 (310 units). The general areas where the proposed project would result in the development of office, residential and/or mixed-use buildings are also depicted in previously referenced Figure 3. Because the existing residential areas of the VGMP are not within the general areas of development for the proposed project (identified in Figure 3), no displacement of existing housing would occur and construction of new housing would not be required. Because no impact associated with this issue will occur, discussion of this issue will not be carried forward in the Supplemental EIR. R:\CRG0803_Vlctoria Gardens\Initlal Study\SecGon 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • 148 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-51 • Inlarmatian showing Less Nan Issues and Supporting Information Greater s~gNSant Naw Inluimabon 9gnificarrt Impacl/Nu Sources: Substemiel Substantial EHecta Showing Ability Changes or Change In Chenpe In Tian to Retluce, but New Prged varrstance Evaluatetl not Eliminate Infonnabon Repmnng Repairing In Na eigrdficam Reduiring Malmo EIR Meior EIR Prevous EHeas In Preparepon of Rewvau Rewslons EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impea c) No Impact. As described in the previous response, the project site has been developed and paved over with parking lots, roadways, and structures. Existing housing within the project limits is located on the northern portion of the site as depicted in previously referenced Figure 3. The general areas where the proposed project would result in the development of office, residential and/or mixed-use buildings are also depicted in previously referenced Figure 3. The proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of people and would not necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Because no impact associated with this issue will occur, discussion of this issue will not be carried forward in the Supplemental EIR. Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR The VGMP Final EIR did not include mitigation measures related to population and housing. Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project; therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to population and housing. Environmental Determinations Major EIR Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to population and housing resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. \J No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to population and housing. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant.environmental impacts related to population and housing resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects on population and housing were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I ~49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-52 Infomiaaan showing less then ' Greeter Naw Significant Issues and Supporting Information SipNficent Udormadon ImpactMo Sources: Subswnael Substanual EHeds Shawin0 Ab0ry changes or Chenpe in Chenpe In Then to Reduce, bN New Prgea 'ramfistence Evaluated nd Eliminate Information ReRUinnp Rapuldnp In tha Sipraficarrt Repuinng Maior EIR M.yor EIR Pravlaus EHeas in Preparation of - Revisions Rersans EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertormance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () () ('~) ( ) b) Police protection? O O O O (`~) ( ) c) Schools? O O O O (~) ( ) d) Parks? O O O O (~) O e) Other public facilities? () () () () (`~) ( ) Responses: a) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Fire protection services would be provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD). The proposed project includes the development of commercial/retail, office, and up to 290 multi-family residential units; thereby increasing the demand for fire protection services; however, the development proposed is within the development envelope already considered in the Final EIR for the VGMP. Incorporation of the mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR will reduce potential impacts associated with development of the proposed project to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. b) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Police services are provided for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under contract with the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. As described in the Final EIR for the VGMP, the number of homes and commercial areas may provide targets for criminal activity; therefore, the proposed project will contribute to an incremental increase in demand on police services and facilities. Development of the proposed commercial, office and residential uses may increase the potential for crimes against persons and property; therefore, additional police protection will be required. Initially, crimes of grand theft and malicious mischief during construction will be the major crime problem. After construction and occupancy of the proposed project, an increased potential for crimes against property (theft, robbery, and burglary) will become the primary concern of local police. Mitigation identified in the VGMP Final EIR recommended the setting aside of retail space dedicated to an on-site police substation office. The on-site police substation office currently exists. Because the proposed project would not increase development R:\CRG0803_Vlctoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • I-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-53 u Informa0on Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater signmpnt New Inignnabm Signibcant ImpaNNo Sources: .Rnb$tant181 Substenbal EHeas Showing hbiliry Changes or Change In Change in Tian to Reduce, bra New Prgea gwmstanw Evaluetetl nol Eliminate Information Requiring Regmnng In the SigNfiranl Regmnng Melon ElR Malor ElR Prewous ENedsin Preperabm of Rewsions ReWslons EIR Prewous EIR an EIR No Impact beyond what was previously approved, no additional impact would occur. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required: • c) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an E/R. As described in the Initial Study for the VGMP, the proposed project is located within the Etiwanda Elementary School District and the Chaffey Joint Union School District. Assessment fees for commercial and residential development are required for both districts. The construction and occupation of the additional 290 dwelling units will increase the population of school aged children; however, the 290 dwelling units proposed were already considered and analyzed in the Final EIR for the VGMP. The VGMP Final EIR identified that as a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Etiwanda and Chaffey School Districts, both have urged and continue to urge the City not to approve development unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development project. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School DistricUChaffey Joint High School District and the project developer by providing a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential and rate per square-foot of commercial development of the project site. Implementation of this mitigation would reduce impacts on schools to a less-than-significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. d) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. Please see responses 14(a) and (b). e) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As described in the Initial Study for the VGMP, maintenance of public facilities and infrastructure in the City would not be significantly altered by development of the proposed project. The services and utilities required to operate this manner of commercial, residential, and office uses would be typical of other uses in the City, and will not result in excessive wear and tear on the existing circulation, sewer, storm drain, or other public facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact is expected from implementation of the proposed project. No further. analysis of this issue in the Supplemental EIR is required. • Mitigation Measures from the Fina! EIR 4.6.2A. As stated in the General Requirements and Approval for the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with City Engineering prior td final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for any projects within the project area. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The developer shall submit to the City a Public Safety and Security Plan, which identifies the developer's intent to provide safety services to the project to supplement normal City Police Services. R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensUnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc I -51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-54 Information Showing Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater significant New InfprmaDan Sgnificant ImpactMo $OUfCeS: ~ SuDStenuel Substan0el EHects Shoring Abihry Changes or Chenpe In Change in Than m ReEuce, but New Project 'ramstenco Evaluatetl not Ehminale InfortnaDon Requinng Requiring In the Sgnih,arrt Requiring Major EIR Major EIR Prewcus EHeas in Preperabon of Ravlslons Revisions EIR Previous EIR en EIR No Impact 4.6.26. To address the increased demand on City police services resulting from the proposed project, an area within the retail center will be set aside for an on-site City police substation office. 4.6.3A. The developer shall join Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 to provide fire protection services to the site. 4.6.38. The developer shall install full, automatic fire sprinklers systems in all commercial/retail, office, civic and multi-family residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance No. 22. 4.ti.3C. The Fire District shall be consulted on street name assignments to assure compliance with response plans. Refined Project Mitigation Measures 4.6.36. The developer shall install full, automatic fire sprinklers systems in all commercial/retail, office and residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance No. 22. Environmental Determinations Major E/R Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to public services resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to public services. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to public services resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc • • • I -52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-55 • • • INgrmevm showing Less then Issues and Supporting Information Greater sigmficen, New mtom,anon S,gN6®nt ImpacUNq $Ol1rCeS: RuMtanaal Substanaal EHads Showing nmLry Changes or Change in Chanpe,n Then to ReOUce,M New Prom ,rwmslance Evaluatatl nm El,minam InformaLm Requ,ring Requ,nng In Ne Slgnificem Raqu,rinp Malor ElR Mellor ElR Prewaus Etleds in PrepareLan al Rewvons Rensia¢ EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact 14. RECREATION. Would the project.' a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks () () () () (/) ( ) or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities () () () () (/) ( ) which might have an adverse ' physical effect on the environment? Responses• a) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The project site is located in a developed area. Because the proposed project includes the development of housing units, it may increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. The VGMP includes various amenities available to the public and future residents such as a library, community play house, performing arts theater, and community center all within walking distance for residents. The proposed project will be required to adhere to design guidelines identified by the City that would include open space requirements for the proposed residential units. Furthermore, in accordance with the Quimby Act, the project is required by the City to dedicate land or pay fees in lieu thereof, or a combination of both, for park and recreational purposes. The payment of fees would reduce recreation impacts to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. b) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As previously described, the VGMP includes various amenities available to the public and future residents such as a library, community play house, performing arts theater, and community center all within walking distance for residents. Additionally common areas, parks and recreational areas, which would include elements such as plazas or other hardscaping, landscaping with planters, plazas, pocket parks, fountains, furniture are likewise expected to be urban in nature and would complement the proposed project. Because the proposed project includes the development of open space as part of the project, it would not result in the requirement to construct or expand new or existing recreational facilities. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Initial Study prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. R:\CRG0803_Victoda Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc I -53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-56 informatim Showlnq Less than nd Su ortin Information I Greater Naw Signispnt pp g ssues a s~gmrpant Inlprmabon ImpactMp SoGrces: Substansal Substanael Effects Shovnnq Pblllry Changes a Change In Change in Than 10 Reduce, but Naw Purled irmrnttance Evaluated not Eliminate Inlormetion Repmnng ReOUidnq In the SlgniM1Cant Repulnng Mapr EIR Malor EIR Prenous Effects In Preparebon of Rensians ReNsipu EIR Prerlous EIR an EIR No Impact Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR The VGMP Final EIR did not include mitigation measures related to recreation. Refined Project Mitigation Measures There are no new significant impacts associated with the proposed project; therefore, no new and/or refined mitigation measures are required for issues related to recreation. Environmental Determinations Major E/R Revisions Not Required. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that major changes to the VGMP Final EIR are required. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to recreation resulting from implementation of the proposed project. No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions. The foregoing analysis and information indicates that the proposed project would not result in a substantial change in circumstances requiring major EIR revisions. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in the Final EIR. This Initial Study has analyzed all available relevant information to determine whether there is new information that was not available at the time the VGMP Final EIR was certified that may indicate that a new significant effect may occur that was not reported in the VGMP Final EIR. Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no substantial new information that would result in greater significant effects. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to recreation. A comparison of the VGMP with the proposed project has determined that there are no significant environmental impacts related to recreation resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Therefore, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensVnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • u • I ~54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-57 U Infortnatlon Showing Less than Issues and Su ortin Information Greater Naw Signitlpni pp g SigNfcent Information ImpeoVNo Sources: Suostandal SuMtenaal EHepS Showing ADdity Changes or Change in Change m Than to Reduce, twt New Prged vwmstance Evaluated not Eliminate Intortnanon Reouinn9 Raomnnp In Ne Sipn~cent Re9uinng Melor EIR Major EIR Pranoua EHegs in Prelaara9on of Rewsions Revisions EIR Prewws EIR en EIR Na Impaa 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and _ capacity of the street system (i.e., () () () () (/) ( ) result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the () () () () (/) ( ) county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an () () () () () (/) increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., () () () () (/) ( ) sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency () () () () (/) ( ) access? f) Result in inadequate parking () () () (/) () ( ) capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting () () () () (/) ( ) alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Responses: a-b) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The VGMP Final EIR analyzed the projected traffic impacts for all the VGMP uses. The proposed project would not result in an increase in square footage already approved nor would it increase the number of dwelling units previously approved for the VGMP. Therefore, the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the VGMP Final EIR fully analyzes traffic impacts that would result from the proposed project as well. Analyses of the project driveways under year 2007 with project and year 2020 with project conditions R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc I ~55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-58 Infonnalim Showlnq Less than .Issues and Supporting Information Greeter 9grurpam New mmrmaupn Sigmfcerrt Impeq/No Sources: SuESUMaI Substan8el EHeas Shavnng Abiliry Changesw Chenpe In Change In Then to Retluce, Otrt New Prgad 'rarrt¢tence EvalueteC not Ehminate IntomaUOn Requlnnq Repuinnp In Ne SlgNfrent Requinng Malor EIR Malor EIR Prwias EHetls in Preparation of Revisims Revisiau EIR Premous EIR an EIR No Impatl indicate that all project access driveways will operate with satisfactory levels of service based on the turn restrictions and stop control proposed as part of the project. Consequently, impacts at the proposed project driveways are considered to be less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. c) No /mpact. The proposed project site is located approximately 4.0 miles north of the Ontario International Airport and the project site is not within the flight path and would not change air traffic patterns. No further discussion of this issue is required in the Supplemental EIR. d) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The proposed project would not result in an increase in square footage already approved nor would it increase the number of dwelling units previously approved for the VGMP. Therefore, the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the VGMP r'inal EIR fully analyzes traffic impacts that would result from the proposed project as well. As described in the Final EIR for the VGMP, Year 2007 and 2020 levels of service at the project driveways along Day Creek Boulevard and Church Street are of concern with respect to hazards resulting from design features. The lane configurations of these roadways, as well as the stop control and turn restrictions at each project driveways, are as follows: Day Creek Boulevard. The tight spacing of intersections on Day Creek Boulevard between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street presents challenges for traffic progression and for providing adequate queuing space for both through and left turn movements. Alternative designs may be possible that provide satisfactory intersection operations with fewer lanes. The design features required at the driveways along Day Creek Boulevard are as follows: Driveway A. Restricted to right turns in and right turns out only. Driveway B. A "half signal" that controls only northbound traffic, westbound traffic, and southbound left turns is required at this driveway. Westbound through movements and eastbound left turns and through movements are prohibited. Southbound through movements are uncontrolled so that queuing will not block Driveway C. Side-by-side northbound and southbound left turn lanes are provided on Day Creek Boulevard between Driveway B and Driveway C to allow adequate storage for left turn movements into the project. Two lanes are provided for westbound traffic (i.e., traffic exiting the project). Driveway C. Full signalization is required at this driveway. Dual southbound left turn lanes on Day Creek Boulevard are required to achieve a satisfactory level of delay for left turn movements into the project. Two inbound lanes will be required on the project site to receive traffic from the southbound left turns. Two lanes are provided for westbound traffic (i.e., traffic exiting the project). Signal coordination with Driveway B will be required to permit northbound traffic departing Driveway B to pass through Driveway C without stopping. Driveway D. Restricted to right turns in and right turns out only. Fi:\CRG0803_Vic[oria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • u • I -56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-59 • Inlwmahon Showing Less than sues and Su ortin Information I Careater Naw sipnlhcent s PP 9 Sigrurwnt mtormeaon ImpauVNo Sources: SubstanLel Suhstaneel EXeots Showlnp AMhty Changes ar Change In Change In Than to Reduce, a,n New Protect uwmstance Evaluated not Eliminate Inlormaaon Regmnng ReQUldnp In Ma Signlfitant Raeuinnq Mapr EIR Motor EIR Prarious ENects In PrepareLOn o/ Revisions Rewslons EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact Driveway E. Restricted to right turns in and right turns out only. Church Street. Church Street will be a four-lane roadway with a median allowing for left turn pockets at project driveways. Driveway F will need to be stop sign controlled on the minor street approach (i.e., the driveway). Driveway G will be signalized as part of a required improvement of the Victoria Arbors project on the north side of Church Street. The level of service analysis indicates that full ingress and egress can be accommodated at these driveways. • The addition of project traffic to year 2007 and year 2020 conditions will not have a significant impact on the project access driveways on Day Creek Boulevard, Church Street, Victoria Gardens Lane, and Foothill Boulevard. Analyses of the project driveways under year 2007 with project and year 2020 with project conditions indicate that all project access driveways will operate with satisfactory levels of service based on the turn restrictions and stop control proposed as part of the project. Consequently, hazard impacts at the proposed project driveways that would otherwise be caused by traffic congestion at the driveways are considered to be less than significant. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. e) Less Than Significant ImpacUNo Changes or New In/ormation Requiring Preparation of an EIR. As described in the Final EIR for the VGMP, the final design of all roadways and intersections within the limits of the project site is required to incorporate design standards tailored specifically to access requirements of the proposal in accordance with established development standards. Adherence to applicable requirements of the City, San Bernardino County, and/or other agencies will reduce impacts associated with emergency access to a less than significant level. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. f) New Information Showing Ability to Reduce, but not Eliminate Significant Effects in Previous EIR. As described in the Final EIR for the VGMP, the preliminary design of the VGMP included 6,520 parking spaces. The proposed project includes the development of mid-rise residential structures in three proposed locations (see Figure 3) that would be constructed on existing surface parking areas. The proposed residential structures would eliminate existing parking while simultaneously increase the demand for additional parking for the future residents. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a substantial change in the project and alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, this issue will require further analysis in the Supplemental EIR. However, implementation of the following new mitigation measure will reduce this impact to less than significant: New Mitigation Measure. Prior to issuance of each building permit for all subsequent • residential or commercial structures, the project applicant shall submit to the City Planning and Engineering Departments and receive approval of a parking demand study. The objective of the parking demand study will be to demonstrate that adequate parking will be provided for the subsequent structures while maintaining adequate parking for existing R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-OS.doc I-57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-60 Infartnedm ShowlnB Less then Issues and Supporting Information Greater sigrvllpant New Intprmatim 9gNlirant ImpaclMa Sources: Suhstan4al SuMtantlel EHeds ShaMng Abllly Changes or Change in Change in Then to RaduC•, btl New Prged ,rwmstence Evaluated nrn Eliminate IntomnaHm Requlnn9 R•quidng In th• SlgNficent Requlnng Malmo EIR IAapr EIR Previous EHects In Preperagon of Revisions Rewslons EIR PreNOUS EIR an EIR No Impact uses. The parking demand study will be based on a shared parking analysis utilizing acceptable parking demand rates. The parking demand analysis will address the proximity of existing and future structures to existing and future parking locations to ensure that reasonable walking distances are maintained for existing and future residents, retail, and Cultural Center customers, and employees. g) Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. The project design includes, or the project would be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, and carpool parking). The proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Implementation of the proposed project would not change or alter the analysis described in the Final EIR prepared for the VGMP; therefore, a less than significant impact would occur and further analysis in the Supplemental EIR is not required. Mitigation Measures from the Final EIR 4.1.1 A The project shall make a fair share contribution to following improvements: • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps -Addition of a free southbound right turn lane. • Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane -Addition of a free northbound right turn lane. Short eastbound green phase will necessitate prohibition of pedestrian crossing of Day Creek Boulevard on the south leg of this intersection. • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a free westbound right turn lane, which will continue to become the free northbound right turn lane at Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane. Conversion of one northbound left turn lane to a northbound through lane. Addition of a free northbound right turn lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right turn lane at I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard. Addition of a third southbound left turn lane. Conversion of southbound shared though/right turn lane to a dedicated southbound right turn lane. Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for southbound right turn movement. As an alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right turn for this movement would improve overall intersection operations slightly and permit eastbound U-turns, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements. This signal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to turn left. Coordination of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane shall be implemented to provide maximum use of southbound green time. Signal timing must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection in order to connect a pedestrian trail from north to south. Short northbound through green phase will require pedestrians crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase. A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the east leg of the intersection. Victoria Gardens Lane/Base Line Road -Conversion of planned northbound shared through/right turn lane to a free right turn lane. Addition of a dedication eastbound right turn lane. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist &04-OB.doc • • • I ~58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-61 CJ InformeUOn Showng Less than ues and Su ortin Information I Greater New Signifoant ss PP g SigNhcant InformaUOn ImpacVNo 6ources: SubstenHal aubstanLel Effects Showing AbNry Changes or Chengem Chenpem Then to ReEUce, bul New Projatl Irwmstance EvaluateE not Eliminate InfonnaHOn Regmnnp Requiring In the SigNfiwN Requmng bAalor EIR Malor EIR Previws EHeas In Prepa2bon of Revislms Renslons EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impact • Victoria Gardens Lane/Church Street -Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing far northbound right turn movement. • Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route -Addition of a second northbound through lane. • Etiwanda Avenue/Slover Avenue -Addition of a second southbound left turn lane and a free westbound right turn lane. • I-15 Southbound and Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road -Freeway interchange must be reconstructed to include southbound and northbound loop on-ramps. Plans for the reconstruction of this interchange are currently being prepared by Caltrans, SANBAG, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The reconstruction of this interchange will include the reconstruction of the intersection of East Avenue and Base Line Road. • Cherry Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a second southbound left turn lane. This mitigation will maintain the level of service at this intersection at its 2001 level, which did not meet the City of Fontana's LOS C standard. r1 LJ 4.1.2A.As shown in Table 4.1.M (VGMP Final EIR), the addition of the following freeway lanes would maintain freeway operations under year 2007 with project conditions at acceptable levels of service: • Interstate 15 from Jurupa Street to I-10 -Addition of one northbound HOV lane. • Interstate 10 from Archibald Avenue to I-15 -Addition of one eastbound mixed-flow lane. • Interstate 10 from Etiwanda Avenue to Valley Boulevard -Addition of one eastbound HOV lane. • Interstate 10 from Valley Boulevard to Cherry Avenue -Addition of one eastbound mixed flow lane and one eastbound HOV lane. 4.1.3A The project shall make a fair share contribution to the following improvements: • Archibald Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a dedicated eastbound right turn lane, a dedicated northbound right turn lane, and a second southbound left turn lane. • Haven Avenue/Base Line Road -Addition of a third eastbound through lane and a second eastbound left turn lane. • Milliken Avenue/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps -Addition of a free northbound right turn lane. • Milliken Avenue/Base Line Road -Addition of a third eastbound through lane. • Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a third eastbound through lane, a third and a fourth southbound through lanes, and a dedicated northbound right turn lane. C • Milliken Avenue/Arrow Route -Addition of a second eastbound left turn lane, a third eastbound through lane, and a fourth northbound through lane. • Milliken Avenue/4th Street -Addition of a third southbound left turn lane. Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for northbound right turn movement. • Rochester Avenue/Arrow Route -Conversion of second northbound left turn lane to a second northbound through lane. R:\CRG0803_Vlctoda Gardens\Initial StudytSection 3 checklist 9-04-OB.doc I -59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-62 Information Showing Less than Greater New SiBnihpnt Issues and Supporting Information signirrant mfwmation ImpacVNo Sources: substantial Substantial ENens Shovnng Ability Changes or Change in ChenBe in men to Retluce,fwl New Projeq iran¢tance Evaluetetl not EliMnate Iniormahon ' ~ RaquinnB RequlAnB In the Signincent Requinng Mapr EIR Mapr EIR Prenaus EHeCS in Preparalion of Rewsions Rewsiau EIR Prewous EIR an EIR No Impact • I-15 Southbound Ramps/4th Street -Addition of a free southbound right turn lane. Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for northbound right turn movement. • Day Creek Boulevard/Summit Avenue -Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound right turn lanes. • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Westbound Ramps -Construction of a loop off-ramp for westbound SR-210 traffic exiting south onto Day Creek Boulevard. • Day Creek Boulevard/SR-210 Eastbound Ramps -Addition of a free northbound right turn lane. Conversion of eastbound shared left turn/through/right turn lane to a shared through/right turn lane. • Day Creek Boulevard/Highland Avenue - Addition of dedicated northbound and southbound right turn lanes. Conversion of westbound shared throughlright turn Zane to a dedicated right turn lane. Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for westbound right turn movement. • Day Creek Boulevard/Base Line Road -Addition of a second eastbound left turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane. • Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane -Addition of a free northbound right turn lane. Short eastbound green phase will necessitate prohibition of pedestrian crossing of Day Creek Boulevard on the south leg of this intersection. • Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard -Addition of a free westbound right turn lane, which will continue to become the free northbound right turn lane at Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane. Conversion, of one northbound left turn lane to a northbound through lane. Addition of a free northbound right turn lane, which will continue to become a dedicated right turn lane at I-15 Southbound Ramps/Foothill Boulevard. Addition of a third southbound left turn lane. Conversion of southbound shared though/right turn lane to a dedicated southbound right turn lane. Modification of signal phasing to provide right turn overlap phasing for southbound right turn movement. As an alternative to the overlap phasing, a free (uncontrolled) right turn for this movement would improve overall intersection operations slightly and permit eastbound U-turns, although a LOS calculation will show greater average delay for controlled movements. This signal will need to be operated "split phase" northbound and southbound to allow three southbound lanes to turn left. Short westbound through green phase will require pedestrians crossing Day Creek Boulevard on the north leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase. A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the north leg of the intersection. Southbound left turn lanes must be side-by-side with the northbound left turn lane at Victoria Gardens Lane tc provide sufficient queuing capacity for southbound left turn movements. Coordination of signal timing with Day Creek BoulevardNictoria Gardens Lane shall be implemented to provide maximum use of southbound green time. Signal timing must consider pedestrian crossing of the east leg of the intersection in order to connect a pedestrian trail from north to south. Short northbound through green phase will require pedestrians crossing Foothill Boulevard on the east leg of this intersection to cross to the median on one phase and then continue on a subsequent phase. A countdown pedestrian signal and an eight-foot wide raised median to serve as a pedestrian refuge must be provided in the east leg of the intersection. R:\CRG0803_Victoria GardensUnitial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • 160 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-73 • Infartna4on Showing Less than Issues and Su ortin Information PP 9 Grealar Sigrvhcant Naw InfonnaHan Signifieant ImpacNNo SOU(CeS: Substan4al Substen4al EHegs Shovnng AMlity Changes or Change in Change in Than to Ratluce, M Naw Prgeq vwmsiance Evaluetetl not EOminate Information Regmnng Repuinng In Ne Sigrtlficant Regmnng Major EIR Major EIR Premous ENegs In Prepare4on a Revisions Rrnslans EIR Previous EIR an EIR No Impeq change. The foregoing analysis and information did not identify substantial changes in circumstance related to aesthetics and traffic. No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than in, the Final EIR. The foregoing analysis has identified new information that would result in greater significant effects than identified in the VGMP Final EIR for scenic vistas, the character and quality of the site and surroundings, glare, The new information includes the proposed project's amendments to maximum height limitations that may partially obstruct scenic vistas of the San Gabriel Mountains when viewed from Foothill Boulevard and I-15 and may significantly alter the existing character or quality of the site and surroundings due to the larger massing and scale of buildings. Additionally, the larger massing and scale of buildings associated with the proposed project would result in glare impacts that were not identified in the VGMP Final EIR due to the increase of reflective materials (e.g., glass). New impacts that may result from new information related to the proposed project will be analyzed further in the Supplemental EIR. The foregoing analysis and information did not identify substantial new information showing greater significant effects related to aesthetics and traffic than was identified in the VGMP Final EIR. No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in the Final EIR. The • VGMP Final EIR determined that no significant effects would result from the VGMP in relation to aesthetic resources or traffic. A comparison of the VGMP Final EIR with the proposed project has determined that there are new significant environmental impacts related to aesthetic resources resulting from implementation of the proposed project. However, because no significant effects were identified for the proposed project, the ability to reduce significant effects is not applicable. The VGMP Final EIR determined that significant effects would result from the VGMP with respect to short-term construction emissions and long-term operational emissions. The mitigation measures identified in the VGMP Final EIR did not reduce impacts to a less than significant level. Impacts resulting from the VGMP with respect to short-term construction and long-term operation emissions would remain significant even with implementation of mitigation. The proposed project does not include new information that would reduce significant effects identified in the VGMP Final EIR. • R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Inltlal Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc I -61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga AMENDMENTS TO THE VICTORIA GARDENS MASTER PLAN Page 3-74 InfonnaUpn Shovnng Less than Issues and Supporting Information Greater s~gNSean, New mmnnafim Slgnlficanl ImpapVNp Sources: Su0.5tan6al SubstaROal EXeas Shomng Abiliry Changan or Change m Change in Than to Reduce, M New Prged uWnatance Evaluated not Eliminate Infprmenon Ragwnng Requlnng In Ne SigNfirant Ragmdng Malo EIR Malmo EIR PfeNWS Effects m Preparation of Revisims Revisims EIR Previws EIR an EIR No Impact REFERENCES: State of California, Department o/ Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001-2008, with 2000 Benchmark. Sacramento, California, May 2008., site accessed on May 9, 2008. Housing and Urban Development, accessed on May 26, 2006, http://www. huduser. org/rbc/search/rbcdetails.asp? Docl d=1224. Ontario General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., October 1991. Ontario International Airport Impact Area Map, http://www.lawa.org/onUcontourMaps.cfm, accessed on May 9, 2008. Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, The Planning Center, October 17, 2001. Rancho Cucamonga General Plan 2000 Update Final Environmental Impact Report, Michael Brandman Associates, June 2001. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Originally published in 1980. Victoria Gardens Master Plan, Forest City Development, January 18, 2002. 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, Cucamonga Valley Water District, December 31, 2005. Inland Empire Utilities Agency Ten Year Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Period 2004/05 - 2013/15, Inland Empire Utilities Agency, June 2004. R:\CRG0803_Victoria Gardens\Initial Study\Section 3 checklist 9-04-08.doc • • u I -62 ~t''et r'f~'r'i~"~i;Yi~ ~~~sL~ .~ (~ ~- Y`;tiu~; t z .qq ~ ~E ~~'~;~~_ ~pl~Y.. T H G C I T Y O F h°.`.:i''~..~'mn~e rr`is"''S5'~~'.~'"°~'i'%?i..~"5k~ ~ e=? ~i?-s:~',,°'itw:'l,;v~~~i1 n1:isuu~ A ~~'"ruil5i'eaf.. i,~w; yY:ue::a~:'.:f~y~~i~'::i;.:+n; ti?'~.~Z.~a..~~v.'i:i:Y~3uR~:i:'~+~ RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: September 24, 2008 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Adam Collier, Planning Technician SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE INTERPRETATION - DRC2008-00746 - A request for an interpretation from the Planning Commission regarding the definition of setbacks for flag lots per Development Code Section 17.02.140, Definitions. • A. Abstract: As provided for under Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.02.0306, Clarification of Ambiguity, staff is seeking an interpretation from the Planning Commission regarding the definition of setbacks for flag lots. Ambiguity has arisen regarding the proper location of the required front, side, and rear yard areas (Exhibit A). Interpretation. from the Commission is necessary to provide for consistent application of the setback requirements for flag lots. B. Background: The issue arose because the Development Code does not provide a definition for a Flag Lot, only an exhibit (Exhibit "A"). Per this exhibit, the setbacks are determined by the call-outs on the exhibit identifying the lot depth and lot width. By definition in Section 17.02.140, the "Lot Depth" is defined as the "horizontal distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line". The "Lot Width" is defined by the Development Code as the "horizontal distance between side lot lines, measured from the front property line" (Exhibit B). The Development Code is vague in that it lacks a clear definition of the required yard areas for flag lots. Second, the exhibit does not provide guidance as to how to determine setbacks for irregularly shaped flag lots. Staff has noted issues with the implementation of this standard for calculating flag lot setbacks as the dimensions and shape often varies in the case of irregularly shaped legal flag lots. Staff had determined that the strict and literal interpretation of Development Code Section 17.02.140 would preclude many lots from being buildable, thus incur a regulatory,taking. • C. Analysis In order to prevent this situation in the past, the interpretation was•made to allow the setbacks to be determined based on the narrowest lot line (Exhibit C). Numerous residential tracts and existing legal lots have been developed under this interpretation. In ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT INTERPRETATION OF FLAG LOT SETBACKS September 24, 2008 Page 2 these cases, the setback dimensions are not reduced, only modified to permit buildability of the lots. The purpose of building setbacks is to provide open space for building separation and proper neighborhood scale based on the land use density. The strict interpretation of the Development Code would limit the ability to vary the plotting of a home as well as reduce the potential for a more usable rear yard area. It would seem appropriate to allow setbacks for flag lots to be determined by the narrowest lot line as they are often irregularly shaped, and that the strict and literal interpretation of the Development Code would prevent some lots from being buildable. If the Commission interprets the language differently than how staff has routinely applied the definition, then a variance request may be the only option for the many properties to be reviewed and subsequently developed. D. Environmental: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project is considered a Ministerial Project by Section 15268 of the CEQA Guidelines as it only involves the use of fixed standards or objective measurements in interpreting the Development Code. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Department staff has considered the determination of exemption, and requests that the Commission, based on its own independent judgment, concur with the staff's determination of exemption. Staff has determined that no additional environmental • review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the DRC2008-00746. RECOMMENDATION: If the Commission concurs with the approach outlined in this report, then staff should be directed to prepare a Resolution of Record setting forth the findings and interpretation of the Commission. Respectfully submitted, .~ ~- ~ Tro er AICP Ja e R. y , Pla ~ ing Director JRT:AC/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Development Code Flag Lot Exhibit Exhibit B -Flag Lot Setbacks - As Defined by Development Code Exhibit C -Flag Lot Setbacks -Interpretation Resolution of Approval • J-2 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2008-00746, AN INTERPRETATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 17.02.140, DEFINITIONS -FLAG LOTS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Interpretation No. DRC2008-00746, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Interpretation is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of September, 2008 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, • Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- . referenced meeting on September 24, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically fnds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed interpretation will not have a significant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This interpretation does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This interpretation promotes the goals and objectives ofthe Development Code as it does not reduce the development standards for residential districts, but promotes development that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods; and c. The proposed interpretation will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the subject • interpretation will not create any health or safety issues to surrounding neighborhoods or existing improvements; and J-3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 08-52 DEVELOPMENT CODE INTERPRETATION -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24, 2008 Page 2 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code as it does not reduce or modify the development standards for residential districts; and e. The proposed interpretation is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project is considered a Ministerial Project by Section 15268 of the CEQA Guidelines as it only involves the use of fixed standards or objective measurements in interpreting the Development Code. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independentjudgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. a. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the interpretation (DRC2008-00746). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby finds that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.02.140, Definitions -Flag Lots, shall be interpreted to allow the setbacks to be determined by the narrowest lot line. .TI ..... _ .. _.. _.. _ .. _ .. -.. _ . 0 v Q m v ~l m N N n. m v o z" ' sv ° ... / ~ ,-: ". ~ ~ ~, m Q, ~ ~ Narrowest Portion of Lot ~ m v. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~'^'>" ' Street .~ • • J-4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-52 DEVELOPMENT CODE INTERPRETATION -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 24, 2008 • Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, .A!GP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, • do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: J-5 LU t'UID TM _! I FLAG L~3T o~ --- - -- -----~ I i i Ly,r ~///1J{~~^~~ G~J Development Code Flag Lot Exhibit Section 17.02.140 -Definitions Exhibit "A" • J-6 Rear Yard Setback I i Front Yard Setback L. ', Lot Line Parallel to Street Flag Lot Setbacks As Defined by Development Code Exhibit "B" J-7 • .. ~ ~ v °- cn m .-. v I ~ n m I v ~ ~ o~ I a ~ ~' m 6 I v C7 ~ , . .. ~ .. ~~'; ,'nom ~;t I y; ~? r~Tn,,r,,.- ,. >,,~,. ~~ <.c ~ ., Narrowest Portion of Lot {_~.~ I Street Flag Lot Setbacks Interpretation Exhibit "C" C~ J-8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES September 24, 2008 Page 3 more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. In that the previously approved lots are surrounded by existing single-family residential development and the proposed residences meet all development criteria outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2008-00143. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval is for the design of the homes fora 50-lot subdivision located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04 and 06. 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 shall apply. 3) The installation of all stone veneers requires 1/2-inch mortared joints. 4) All perimeter walls and walls exposed to public view shall be decorative. The perimeter walls fronting Miller and East Avenues shall adhere to the approved wall design and materials palette approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5) A maximum 50 percent (9 houses) of Plan 3 may be constructed with the optional rooms over the garage (Plan 3~, Engineering Department 1) Local depression at catch basin(s) shall not interfere with residential drive approaches. 2) If Lot Line Adjustment 660 and related rights-of-way have not recorded at the time of this application approval, dedicate additional right-of-way on Miller Avenue to achieve a total of 44 feet measured from centerline of the street. This dedication is intended to extend across Not-A-Part (NAP) parcel. a) The existing driveway(s) on the NAP property on Miller Avenue need to be removed and new driveway access installed to the interior tract street. 3) Install all public improvements per Drawing Numbers 2200, 2200-D and t ~ - ~~~ A iEeoo~- C°P~ 9/y/~ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS ~' f~i ~5-- 7:20 p.m. Larry Henderson August 19, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.72 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Victoria Community Plan in the Terra Vista Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway -APN: 1077-422-01, 46 and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - a request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.89 acres of land within the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community, generally located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC -Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project, located north of the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive -APN: 1077-422-01, 46 and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit and Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. Design Parameters: This section should be used to explain the site context and those major issues or constraints which affect the design of the project. The site is an infill location within the Terra Vista Community Plan. The site was previously graded and is bordered by perimeter landscaping. The location is currently designated Office Space, but a land use amendment is also being requested to change the 2.89 acre portion to Neighborhood Commercial. The remaining 11.83 acres has a request pending for Medium-High designation for, market-rate age-restricted residential units. The requested commercial site drains to the south and is bordered by a wide (50-foot) shared driveway with a gas station/convenience store and car wash. The proposed small Center is designed with access via the existing L-shaped shared access driveway, which provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Terra Vista Town Center complex to the south. The project is designed with two buildings; the building adjacent to Haven Avenue is a single tenant (Fresh and Easy) of 13,969 square feet, the second building is multi-tenant on the east side of the site that is 12,915 square feet in area. The parcel map is to create a parcel for the neighborhood commercial development and appears consistent with this type of use. A Sign Program has also been submitted as required by the City Development Code. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00163 AND SUBTPM18797- LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC August 19, 2008 Page 2 1. None. The project is well designed and meets all of the development and major design standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Although a pedestrian path has been provided to connect the two proposed buildings, there is a lack of pedestrian amenities and architectural enhancement of the connection. The use of such features as a canopy or trellis, bench/s, drinking fountain, decorative pavement or art work along the walk is recommended. 2. The Sign Program proposes three tenant faces for the 2 monument signs; however, there is only one know major tenant (Fresh and Easy). Monument signs were intended to identify the center name, including the address, which has not been addressed in the submittal. Also a major tenant criterion has not been identified adequately. Does a Center which only has 26,884 square feet need three major tenant sign panels on the monument sign? 3. The monument sign is designed to be compatible with the architecture of the Center; however, because the sign structure is a mono color, much of the architectural detail is lost. It is recommended that the use of the colors used in the Center be considered to highlight the architectural features so that the shape is more physically apparent. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The tenant signage allowance is 10 percent, not 80 percent, of the lease space elevation with a maximum of 150 square feet. Make correction as required by the City Sign Code. 2. The monument sign area is larger than the Code allows (24 square feet). It is currently proposed at 37 square feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee support the project with sufficient response being provided by the applicant to address the items indicated previously and that may be identified during Committee dis ussion. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Larry Henderson The Committee recommended approval of the project as amended by the applicant. f DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Larry Henderson August 19, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18797 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - A request to rearrange existing lot configuration and create new separate parcels on approximately 14.72 acres of land within the Office Professional District of the Victoria Community Plan in the Terra Vista Community, located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Terra Vista Parkway -APN: 1077-422-01, 46 and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, and Development/Design Review DRC2008-00163. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00163 - LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS - a request to construct a 26,884 square foot retail commercial center on 2.89 acres of land within the proposed Neighborhood Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community, generally located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive -APN: 1077-422-01, 46, and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, acid Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18747. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC -Uniform Sign Program for the Haven Square Project, located north of the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive -APN: 1077-422-01, 46 and 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2008-00160, Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment DRC2008-00161, Conditional Use Permit and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00163, and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18797. Design Parameters: This section should be used to explain the site context and those major issues or constraints which affect the design of the project. The site is an infill location within the Terra Vista Community Plan. The site was previously graded and is bordered by perimeter landscaping. The location is currently designated Office Space, but a land use amendment is also being requested to change the 2.89 acre portion to Neighborhood Commercial. The remaining 11.83 acres has a request pending for Medium-High designation for, market-rate age-restricted residential units. The requested commercial site drains to the south and is bordered by a wide (50-foot) shared driveway with a gas station/convenience store and car wash. The proposed small Center is designed with access via the existing L-shaped shared access driveway, which provides convenient vehicle and pedestrian access to Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive. The proposed architecture is consistent with the Terra Vista Town Center complex to the south. The project is designed with two buildings; the building adjacent to Haven Avenue is a single tenant (Fresh and Easy) of 13,969 square feet, the second building is multi-tenant on the east side of the site that is 12,915 square feet in area. The parcel map is to create a parcel for the neighborhood commercial development and appears consistent with this type of use. A Sign Program has also been submitted as required by the City Development Code. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: ~ C ,/~ ~' ~ ~ i DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00163 AND SUBTPM18797- LEWIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS DRC2008-00451 -CHURCH HAVEN COMPANY, LLC August 19, 2008 Page 2 1. None. The project is well designed and meets all of the development and major design standards of the Terra Vista Community Plan and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Although a pedestrian path has been provided to connect the two proposed buildings, there is a lack of pedestrian amenities and architectural enhancement of the connection. The use of such features as a canopy or trellis, bench/s, drinking fountain, decorative pavement or art work along the walk is recommended. 2. The Sign Program proposes three tenant faces for the 2 monument signs; however, there is only one know major tenant (Fresh and Easy). Monument signs were intended to identify the center name, including the address, which has not been addressed in the submittal. Also a major tenant criterion has not been identified adequately. Does a Center which only has 26,884 square feet need three major tenant sign panels on the monument sign? '~ 3. The monument sign is designed to be compatible with the architecture of the Center; however, because the sign structure is a mono color, much of the architectural detail is lost. It is recommended that the use of the colors used in the Center be considered to highlight the architectural features so that the shape is more physically apparent. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. The tenant signage allowance is 10 percent, not 80 percent, of the lease space elevation with a maximum of 150 square feet. Make correction as required by the City Sign Code. 2. The monument sign area is larger than the Code allows (24 square feet). It is currently proposed at 37 square feet. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Committee support the project with sufficient response being provided by the applicant to address the items indicated previously and that may be identified during Committee discussion. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Larry Henderson The Committee recommended approval of the project as amended by the applicant. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 08-44 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00143 - CRESTWOOD COMMUNITIES September 24, 2008 Page 3 more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. In that the previously approved lots are surrounded by existing single-family residential development and the proposed residences meet all development criteria outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2008-00143. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the design of the homes fora 50-lot subdivision located at the northwest corner of Miller Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1100-081-03, 04 and 06. 2) All pertinent conditions of approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17919 shall apply. 3) The installation of all stone veneers requires 1/2-inch mortared joints. 4) All perimeter walls and walls exposed to public view shall be decorative. The perimeter walls fronting Miller and East Avenues shall adhere to the approved wall design and materials palette approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5) A maximum 50 percent (9 houses) of Plan 3 may be constructed with the optional rooms over the garage (Plan 3X'~ Engineering Department 1) Local depression at catch basin(s) shall not interfere with residential drive approaches. 2) If Lot Line Adjustment 660 and related rights-of-way have not recorded at the time of this application approval, dedicate additional right-of-way on Miller Avenue to achieve a total of 44 feet measured from centerline of the street. This dedication is intended to extend across Not-A-Part (NAP) parcel. a) The existing driveway(s) on the NAP property on Miller Avenue need to be removed and new driveway access installed to the interior tract street. 3) Install all public improvements per Drawing Numbers 2200, 2200-D and