Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2008/10/22 - Agenda Packet - Planning Commission
C~ • CJ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CUCAMONGA OCTOBER 22, 2008 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Fletcher Vice Chairman Munoz Stewart- Howdyshell _ Wimberly II.ANNOUNCEMENTS ~. ., III. ,, APPROVAL OF MINUTES III Regular Meeting Minutes of October 8, 2008 I IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. A. DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Development and Design Review of the Thomas Winery Plaza by adding a 13,969 square foot commercial/grocery building and demolition oftwonon-historic commercial buildings of 13,828 square feet with additional site, landscaping and signage changes in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 2) at the northeast corner of Foothill 1 of 5 _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA j:~N~HO OCTOBER 22, 2008 cUCnyoNCn Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24,and 25. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 2b categorical exemption because the project includes replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019; Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590; Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588; Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591 and Variance DRC2008-00781. B. VARIANCE DRC2008-00781 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE " INVESTORS, INC. - A request to allow for an increase to the parking light pole height standard from 15 feet to 18 feet for Development Design Review DRC2008-00587 located in the Specialty Commercial District at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. Related Files: Development/Design Review DRC2008-00587; Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019; Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590; Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588 and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591. C. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00588 -LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Uniform Sign Program for the Thomas Winery Plaza located in the Specialty Commercial District at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. Related Files: Development/Design Review DRC2008- 00587; Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019; Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590; Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591 and Variance DRC2008-00781. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122 room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street -APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow r1 LJ 2of5 :j • • u _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 22, 2008 RANCHO Cf)CAMONGA , for synthetic turf. Staff has prepared a negative declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to City Council for further action. i F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AMENDMENT TO VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to change the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation from School to Mixed Use to allow for single-family Low-Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) designation for 8.79 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive -APN: 0227-171-29 and 30. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18449. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. G. REVOCATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-04R -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT - To consider revocation of an Entertainment Permit in conjunction with a restaurant use, located at 9740 19th Street - APN: 1076-011-10. Related File: Entertainment Permit 87-06R. H. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-O6R -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT - To consider revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for the serving of alcoholic Beverages in conjunction with a restaurant use, located at 9740 19th Street-APN: 1076-011-10. Related File: Entertainment Permit 89-04R. I. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS - A review of the Master Phasing Plan for remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development including a class room wing, temporary classroom modules and multi-purpose hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle de Prado -APN: 208-921-36. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 and Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544. On April 24, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. 3of5 _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 22, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 16, 2008, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting perGovernment Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. rt!' If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. • • 4of5 • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 22, 2008 jZANCeo CUCAMONCA The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p. m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m, to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,039 for maps and $2,141 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 5of5 Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission October 22, 2008 a D N Meeting Location: City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • Item E is aCity-wide issue. at;K~\ ~''~~:~ ,y • T 1-1 L' C I 'r Y O P ~- R4A N C 11 0 C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: October 22, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Development and Design Review of the Thomas Winery Plaza by adding a 13,969 square foot commercial/grocery building and demolition of two non-historic commercial buildings of 13,828 square feet with additional site, landscaping, and signage changes in the Specialty Commercial • District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 2) at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 2b categorical exemption because the project includes replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590, Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, and Variance DRC2008-00781. LANDMARK ALTERATION PERMIT DRC2008-00591 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS INC., - A request to relocate the historic artifacts at the Thomas Winery Plaza in the Specialty Commercial District at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue -APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, 25. Related Files: Development Review DRC2008-00587, Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590, Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588, and Variance DRC2008-00781. VARIANCE DRC2008-00781 -LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. - A request to allow for an increase to the parking light pole height standard from 15 feet to 18 feet for Development Design Review DRC2008-00587 located in the Specialty Commercial District at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. Related Files: DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2008-00587, Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019, Tree Removal Permit • DRC2008-00590, Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588, and Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591. HPC ITEM A PC ITEM A,B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00587 -LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 • Page 2 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2008-00588 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Uniform Sign Program for the Thomas Winery Plaza located in the Specialty Commercial District at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 0208-101-22,' 23, 24, and 25. Related Files: Development/Design Review DRC2008-00587, Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, and Variance DRC2008-00781. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to demolish two non-historic buildings (a combined floor area of 13,828 square feet), construct a new Fresh & Easy building (13,969 square feet), relocate existing tenants to vacant suites within the center, reconfigure the parking lot, upgrade the existing exterior facades and incorporate landscape and signage changes within the existing Thomas Winery commercial plaza. The applicant has been able to adequately accommodate the proposed new building, on-site parking, and other associated site improvements that complement the existing winery buildings. The entrance area for the new building is located on the southwest corner of the building. A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-family residential/Office Professional, Low-Medium Residential South - Commercial buildings/Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Districts, Subarea 2) • East - Shopping plaza/Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Districts, Subarea 2) West - Shopping plaza/Community Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Districts, Subarea 2) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Commercial North - Office, Low-Medium Residential South - General Commercial East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics. The subject property is comprised of four parcels located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. To the east of the project site is an existing older shopping plaza; to the south are commercial buildings comprised of a gas station and a food establishment; to the west is the Vineyard Gateway shopping center; to the north are single-family residential land uses and a proposed office building. The site is currently fully developed with commercial buildings that surround the historic Thomas Winery building. The site slopes slightly from north to south. • A, B,&C- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. • October 22, 2008 Page 3 D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square feet of Parking Spaces Spaces T e of Use Gross Floor Area Ratio Re uired Provided Commercial center 100,267 5/1000 501 513 Note: The applicant has submitted a parking study for the project to demonstrate the adequacy of parking provided. ANALYSIS: A. General: Staff finds the project to be consistent with City code requirements and a necessary and appropriate upgrade to an existing center. The developer has been able to adequately accommodate the proposed building, on-site parking, and other associated site improvements without causing too much disruption to the existing tenants. The proposed building uses natural materials such as real river rock and shingle roofing, as well as decorative trellises to be consistent and compatible with the historic winery theme and its architectural design. Real river rock and storefront trellises are features used in the existing center, and the project proposes to upgrade the whole center utilizing these • same features. The demolition of the existing buildings will improve the center's street visibility, further enhancing the economic viability of entire area. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan and Rancho Cucamonga Development Code which encourages an expansion of the City's economic base and the proper design and integration of a given development into its surrounding context. B. Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588 - As part of the redevelopment of the plaza, the applicant proposes an amendment to the existing Uniform Sign Program #88. This will introduce new tenant monument signs, an Entry Gateway Arch, and the Project I.D. monument signs. The existing monument sign fronting Foothill Boulevard will be replaced with an updated monument that will mimic the Thomas Winery in shape and materials. Another monument sign is proposed to front on Vineyard Avenue The Project I.D. monument sign that is proposed on the corner will also utilize the same corrugated metal and wood material. Changes to the existing tenant signs occur gradually and will be up to the individual tenant to upgrade any signage. The new signage will create visual interest and will attract customers to come visit the center. C. Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591: The 13 historic artifacts that are currently dispersed throughout the plaza will remain in place, with the exception of the kettle and one historic informational sign. The kettle will be moved a few feet west, and the sign will be moved a few feet northeast from their current locations to accommodate for the new Fresh & Easy building. D. Variance DRC2008-00781: The applicant has requested a variance to allow for an • increase to the parking light pole height standard from 15 feet to 18 feet. At the September 16, 2008, Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant demonstrated their justification of the 18-foot height light pole. The 18-foot parking lot lighting A, B,&C- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 Page 4 photometric plan demonstrated that by increasing the height by 3 feet, the increased lighting levels in the drive lanes would provide for a safer driving and pedestrian space. Also, because of the number and size of the existing and proposed trees, it was demonstrated that the 18-foot lighting fixtures would not be easily viewable from off-site properties. The subject site is surrounded by commercial development, with the exception of the residential development to the northeast, but the slight southerly slope of the site will help alleviate any glare issues. From a design and safety standpoint, the lighting fixture mounting heights will be 12 feet in all pedestrian walks and at the main drive corridors. The 18 foot lighting fixtures would only be used in the general "parking area courts" to distinguish pedestrian-ways. For these reasons, the Committee felt comfortable in recommending the applicant to submit a variance application for the 3-foot height increase. E. Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590: The application proposes to remove 32 Gallery pear and 22 California Sycamore trees. Staff performed a site inspection and determined that based on where they are located and where improvements are around them, the trees were most likely planted as part of the initial development of the plaza in 1988. Staff recommends approval of the tree removal permit because none of the trees proposed for removal are mature enough to be considered historic or of cultural significance or considered a "heritage tree" under Section 19.08 of the Municipal Code. • F. Tenant Relocation Plan: The applicant has submitted a tenant relocation plan and timetable to demonstrate how the existing tenants will be accommodated for relocation. A • condition in the draft resolution of approval includes a provision that the tenants must be adequately relocated prior to any demolition permits being issued. The applicant's projected timetable for the project is shown as Exhibit L. Upon recent staff inspection, only two tenants, Antonino's Italian restaurant and Yatai restaurant are going to be relocated within the center. Within the two buildings proposed for demolition, the other businesses have already moved or were given options to relocate within the center but have declined. G. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) reviewed the application on September 16, 2008. The Committee accepted the application and recommended approval. H. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson) reviewed the project on September 16, 2008. The Committee requested that they work with staff on the corner site plan and require the applicant to submit a variance application for the parking light pole height standard. The Committee felt comfortable supporting the variance request and directed the project to come back for review as a Consent item on the October 14, 2008, Design Review Committee meeting. The applicant made the revisions as requested, and the Committee accepted and recommends approval. The Committee reviewed the revised site plan and corner detail and recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental • Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 2b A,B,&C- 4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. • October 22, 2008 Page 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) because the project includes replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The project includes demolishing commercial buildings totaling 13,828 square feet and constructing a new commercial building totaling 13,969 square feet which meets the threshold of "substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity." CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site and within the expanded notification area beyond the standard 660-foot radius to all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard Subarea 2, as required per Development Code Section 17 32.080. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2008-00587, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, and Variance DRC2008-00781 as conditioned in the attached Resolutions Respectfully submitte , ~. • James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Location map Exhibit B -Aerial map Exhibit C -Site Plans, Building Exterior Upgrades Exhibit D -Fresh & Easy Site Plans, Elevations Exhibit E -Landscape Plan Exhibit F -Uniform Sign Program Amendment Exhibit G -Historic Artifacts site layout Exhibit H -Electrical Site Plan, Photometric Plans (18 feet and 15 feet) Exhibit I -Tree Removal Site Plan Exhibit J -Conceptual Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit K -Demolition Plan, Fresh & Easy Truck Access Plan, Fire Service Access Plan, Utility Composite Plan, Storm Drain Facilities Plan Exhibit L -Tenant Relocation Plan and Timetable Exhibit M -Design Review Comments dated September 16, 2008 Exhibit N -Design Review Comments dated October 14, 2008 Draft Resolution of Approval for Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00587 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2008-00781 A,B,&C- 5 C • a Q Z O Q U O J EXHIBITA W z 3 ~~ ~ S N N 0 0 0 T ~z •, ,,.~ ~'~ ~ -~ .;~ ~~ ~~~~ ~'~+ ~.. ...... . .~ ~ .~-sn 1 ~. 1 i'. !r ~ ~~~ r..`. ..~,. .. ~~ ~«; 4 "~ T~~ _ EXHIBIT B • • ~~~ ~,- ° ~ { 1 r A~~. E -- ....r..w, ~ v ~ ~ ~HIB < ~ .h _c, ~_ 'f suuvnp p~snrvlq 8 m s ~ r~ ~ a _< <~~~~ ~ a a 5 ° . a '~ ~ ~r~g~~ ~ B~S~y°~ C zQ5aa~8 ~ ,~B ~~~~m~~~ w 8~ ~~ D~~'3~~~ ~7 _3dELL~~~ ~~ sg E'~ivi~i o° 3w~~xa'ao ocio'oo~i~g z~ ~N~,<^~~o~w 01 4 F a ~ ~_~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a ~~- '$~^ P d"S 3 S~L$ -" Ol mJm E m ~ '~ a . 4 ~ ~ N VJ fi N ~`o m~ d ~~~m o m~ ~°ea $~ ~g~a ~`~~ o® g mNWs~~3z Cm~$ oN49~d €~pmo €Sm €oBm ~~~i~'?Q ~o°~a~~f~ a~~a~oam~NN ~~7170o ' C _m O zzm ~ pp Op s NEmyFy 2N1p N W ~ m 0~ r^$M/$a557p0^iV ~O~O^0000~ MWWJLaaLLQNN ' ~ X i- ~ ~c~ ~. , __ _ _, ~ ~ _ ~ .g ~a~~ 1 $_ ~~ ~ Q~v ® ~ ~ ...a ~\ •~ r(`` 111)• ~.S' 'f 5 ` 1{~.f 1 a ,_ 1 .c: ~ u~ a a ~ r M-.-~- ~~~~•~41~~~~il ~f ~ (~ ~ ~1 ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x~$~~9 L a =~ 3 m i mpQ 0 ~Q m ~ L N Sa m ~m M ~m 7 9 ac ~~ zm :~.~ ~ ~ l a ~~ ~,, ~ -, ~ _ ~ e ~ ,, . ,_ ~ ~' ~_ ~~ ~ 1 ~ rtt ~~6 P . ~ o ~~ ~ .~ o- ~~ e ~l~ y ~ ~ k , ~ ~ c ~I ,~ ~ ~ pp ~ ~ ~G~ } ~ _ ~_-: SE- y .4 P~ ~ ~ Lei a _ = ~ , G ~, i ~ ~:~ ~ ++r+r-r wwyti ~~ ~,~~ -q ' l i A i k. '} ~ .- ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Ily ~, • n U L' E `~° ~ - ° ~ d _ ~` ~s. ~ ~ '~ e e .. s ~F ---''--~ s"- .~ - T ~A ~~A sepe.~Bdn ao~~e}~q Bu~p~~ns m £ ~~ ~=~~~aa mm_ ~m s V8a°p.R mE'.9~~m~m0 E~~~ ~a3°n~`4qo m~ 3 'x g p y 3 0 0~ m p t~ C p$° ~' ~ E °$w~ m2'°Sme~ mme mz~c DnE~m mm~m.-m. mrE'm $1Oy mmv~5 ~c°c"~°~ m~~@ €~~n ~,~~g5 ~myam~ ~E ;, m~gg` . m=-D 4m q~y~~amSm3~ g~ 3~ _F~m~m ~~ u~~~s~ F~~So~3 ~~b ~~fs~33 slo~o~ ~uied a~ooW uiuaefuag iy ~ ~ E d g ~~ 4 ~ 9 0 O m ,V` W e o ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ l~ .w v F i ~ E ~~ g S ~ €j~E~. Z ~ ~a ^~e 8m ~~ ° ~ ~~ 0 e ~ ~B ~Q ~~ m :~ .~ C ~ ~ ~~ . mg 7 mm m U ~~2 gig ~o m~t) mE ~~~~ ay~~ $~C08 m ~ ~ LL m ~Sm a ~~ EZ g3 8~ ~~.. Wn ~~ U LL S, i 7 m i 3RoE~4 V ~ ~ 4 ~;~n °~~~ .a~ ;~~E~ a~a~ ~~~~ S m Q a S ~~~ ~~ .~~~ ~ ~~_~ a E~$i €~ Q C g~3 m E m ! a$~~~ 8 ~~~~~~ g ~ ~e"E€~ i ~~~s~~ m ~ ~ W~ :~~ ~ m LL am C ~ ~ m ,0 o m m 7 2 ~LL m ~ g~ Z ~ c a~ ~~ DW[~ 0 LL C '~ m tW U D O` ~~~m~ °3 ~m~3~ cE°~p m ~ m E ~ C m g m 0 O ~D~~~ a on _E-0 ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ LL mE~~~ d m m a 0 m~~~ ~_.~.j LL m C G 0 ~DO~~ _a c m - mdca ma°a~a ~$p~s$ L C C ~ ~ m X ~ m a:'~ m • • • }~~~~ ~~~ • • C7 ,. d~ ~vltiwens wva 'VJNOWb'~n~ OH~N112~ M ~q e_: E ~~ 42idJ~3Nl/1 ~ ~. C ~. r ~ , ~'-- =4i ~ s1t~~1~ a== ONV llIHlOO~ ,o ~ ~ ~p j~ ~~ Q s :::......... ° ~ a r .- - E ~ ! f ~ ... s Q i ,_wL ! i - ' ~~ ~ ~ Z_ U ~~~ `~ _ > ~~ ~ '_ I _ j ~ m W °° -- ~~ ap~ ~ ~I ~ I I ~ ~ - -- ~ ~ I ` vJ ~ -_- _ _ - ~ - - _ i - _ i .- I I O ._ - -~j _ ~ - _ ~. C7 ~ i _ ~a - m ~ ~ m _ j _. -- ~ -- j - - i I ~ I -- _ _JI T-- I- _ 1 :~ _ I - - -- - , - _ j - ~-: _ - - - i a /.~ I ~~ ~ o I f w uQ,l~< r~ ~' - T Ij ~ S O t I p0 f ; __- ~ ~ ~ ( ~ . - W 3 I --. -__ ~ v ~1 ~ i ~ ~ a i m ~. I - `,~~ -, -_ - - ,~ - ~ "'~ - ~- _ - -- I ~. ~ ~~- ---~ - m I J - - _._ R ~ EXHIBIT D --_ W w- - - - W~ ~ _ ~Q `.~17fF-771H.L00.~3 _ ~~_-. _ - ._ C • 1n u p Y J `bJNOWt/~fl~ OH~N~da ~: ~_ ~~: a21tlJl3Nl/\ ~tii ~ t6~~~4~ _> ONH I~IHl00~ o0 I ~ ~ [ ~~ ~ ._ _! ~ ~ - I'. "'~'' '-~ ~' Q ~ ~~ ~.~!!~ a' ~vltlwens wvd M ~j ~~~~ ~g t~ ~p Q ^~~~ao~~eo~s ~ e i' I i'I ~ I t ' j i ~' i ~:R 2~ ~ L~ttP \ ~ ~ I I~`i~ a# ~~~~~ I ~~; Yz -- _~_ a ~ r ., • , _ Yea ~ N ! LL L'= - -..-_ _ __ i ~ ~ Vl Sb i i • I ~ i ~ a ~ ~ __ ~ ~_ __ i 111 Q Q I O D. aS - h g; x ~ 1-. .. -~ + `n - I I k` ~ I is I c s, - b - - 2 YNr ~0 c ~ _ --- b° ~~ ~ I a _ Q I _ ~_. -_____--_- --__. _ c>~ O ~n ~ ~~ -_ W Z ~, ~ - -~ ---~ ¢w~ g 1 -~ - --~ ?;~ <._ -4- --~ ~~Q~ a - - ~ - --m _.__~ .-~ ZZ~Z ~- ~ QgoQ a 3 I ~ 7~}U ~ <-- (n ~:~ _ ~ .._ F o o ~ ' O ¢ 2 U t- - - i ZC7CDQ ~ b~~ ~ Ntlld 32lfI1Xl~ ~ 'brcJNOWd~fl~ OHONt/2i ~ ~ ~ ~' s=e° ~ ~ti Q?!`dJ~3Nl/~ ~aae ~ tj{{ } ~ «~ ONb'llIHl00~ ~~~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~~ ~~ 6L k€ff tid~5~ ~="' a . • • 1 '~ ~ ~ ~ ~•i • • ~Q ~-.. a ~f~s ~ ~$~~~i~ d0 't/JNOW`dOf10 OHONbZi ~~~ Otlb'A3NIA ~a g~~ aNV llIHl00~ a~l o0 a ~`-I ~i • ~ E „S ...t I- i= _f ~i ~I ~F! s s ~' z 0 F ~° J ~ W ~ SNOIlb'J1313 2108131X3 O i~ ~:x ~~ ~g ~~ N l!i L n _ ~ 9 C ~ E tl e o s ~ ~ H F ~_ a ~ ~ E ~ ~ gt$ F ~ i i ~ E _ ~ r F ~ 6 3 - t Qt ~% 's Sr ~ ~ a ~_ w~~ r.i - ~ ~ Y y6 i~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~< b ~ z C ~~ ~~ ~ r~ ~ v 'ZF z 3 w ~~ v ~m o as a~..: - ~r ~ ~ z a D c zQ$ a U .7a o + • ~ t ~,Ly` `Li ~a -? E a ~ ~= . - a c ^1 0 i~ a LL ~ m O a ~ ~ ~ m Q 5` ~- ~ ~ ~ a 4 y $ ~ .: .~ v v ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ s ,~ ~ ~ g F2 1. U .1 8 s peoy ouip~eu~ag ueg `J • m c m a a m c '> • EXHIBIT E p~enalno8 II!4~oo~ f "'~ s;_ ~A -~- ~ . ~ °~ ~ :~~ ,~~+ ,~ _ ~~ ~:~ ~; ~+.. r,r...., '., i 4 i ~' a E .- ~ '? S .. - .- ., y e ~' f !j l• r~ t~ ;l~ {ra },~ ~~ ~c~ I~~ }2~ 1!j `il ~~~ .. , • n EXHIBIT F f 6 ~ ~ '''• =' ~' ` ~e ~ y a Y t~vj eV r' ~~ r ,. t ~~ ;. ~;: ~fY + r ~ n ~ [ Y ~t ~Y `, ~ 1ia Sys z' ;Q: r t y .js ?~~a `Y' ~4~' ~-~: m ~ :' ~ R~~y.''•`. i'a r f . ~`` -r > f ~. ~• e ~r. j~ ~ ~. f C y~ i G ~r ~~t~Y ``ui } _ x y~ Q f' E ~ ~± `' J~+' ~ ~ `s~3'#~: Ldt' ~~~~~~5~ ~C7L; C ti ~ 1 1 ~ ri ~ ~ S ~~ ~,, ~C-ig .. i ., i'' ~ o ~~6~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ c . ~ F~ ~ ~~~ w ~ t ~ s`$ K ~ ~?~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ ~~ s € ~~ ~`~~ ~' r~z~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~, ~ f~ ~~~~ • • • • • CD ua t T V r 6 a 'r ~~~ • ~~i {~ N Z W • S • .~~-~"al • • • ~ ~ i j .~ ._ - E B ~ ~aJ O. o t ~ ~~, ~~r ~. ~.s ~ ~ ~ ~ e" ~ r = ~ # ~ ~ .~.-4.,.... a~ - -- e , -~ E ~ .j O m ~_ ms 8~ F ~, 0 ~` ~g pL CO O '~_~ ro~ ~ c mmo c 6 ~ S C S F c Fge s `o o ~ ~p~ 0 3 d ~E~ Oo y D ~ s p _O ~ 6 a a ~ C ~ e "s d 5e gc 3 di 6 S 7 i ~~ 5 ~ 4 m £ i ~F B ~~ i ~~ °cc r ~ m ~ i 2Po i 'S i ~ ~ €~ ~: . -~ i 9 c S a ~~ ' ~s a ~ ,~w r ~3 m 3 ~ ~~ E $o~ = a~ O a G °e p i ,A~ ~~ ~~ p .a p o O A ~ .~ a ~t,~, ~c 0. cn m ~~ m ~~~ ~ ~~m s e c o° ~ p o ~~ ~~o LL C .. ~~ pe :m a~ F ~ s` ~~m ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ L~~ a e ~ ~' c a.~~ffi ~ ~m Q~~~ t8 C o i ~ $~~ ~ • • ~ R ~ ~ r a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y i• C U G7 x V O y $~ ~t s ~$ 5~~ 8~~~ r u z F U ~_ Z~ Z Z h 7 u ~~~~~,~ E ref ~C~ ~ ~: ~~~ + € ~3 eE 6 ~, t_~ „ 'e EE ~ i 9F~~a _f~~~ ~~ _.. ~EsEgiiE~ ~~iEe ~asC s a i .. _ ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ PG. ~ 4 -. . ., e , ~ - - t ~ a 5 m : ' ., . ~_ ~. s:- ,:~. s -~ E~ ..__~~ Y '~ ~! ~ t-•~_~x--_ .. _- ,_ ,r`. I i` $ ~B° i1T l~l i ~... ~ _ RBI :i!i~~:.l~'-~i ,: 1jYu i ,q~~1i.~ ~ i,i~nJl - ,. .. ., 'Ef~Lhi.. . l ~ T . 1~~ _ _ _ _ ~ i _ - _ i _ ~ S :: ? _ - J az ; E iE~ ' g EE ~~Efa~ ~ _~~i lsel¢a6q`-f ~ ~~ I~~F at ! ~ ~Eepj I~i~ ~~ e 1 ~ ~Fl; ii ~f I;a 6i fE ;j FF ~, t~k i ~~~~ f ,~ j~ ! ~ e s; ~, .~.~ l: _ ~,~ .__ ~ . ~ _1 ,,, ., , , ~; ;.. f 1 ~ q G ! ~ 'I i ~ ~~ i tt $ ~~ f yy` ~ ii ~ .~`f o€ oy i 1 ~ ire,. f• ' ~ 1 • • ~, i `Y ttl ` o_ , .2 !~ ~ ~ - 's ;~ ~! iii N O y ~1 ~~ ~~ ~~+ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~a [~~ ~~ `~ ~ i< +m~~ `~9 ¢~ ~a ~~ • i! ~ ~. x ~ ~ ~' _ 1 1 •• ~ ~ ~_` ~~ Via, a r ~_)~' 3 ~ °7 ~ / s ~~ s ~ o i ~ ~~ :~ 'eF ~ ~-~~~if ~' NO 1• ~` t_~~6t' ~ i __-_ _._y ~~~~• ,f ,. €_ `~-_ ;e l=FYC° ~f~ ~' - a_ ~. ~ J. E; ? p €~ iFFt Ei~~ ~: `~ F.3 ff -g E! s{iG ~~~4 fit$~~ ~°~"~i6 ~s~~te:?E ~c4{ ~x0 ~ ~, r '. 61 ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ry~ry ~~ i ~ ~u~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ a ! • • • ..tea ±~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E 44 ~~al - _ ~ W 9 ~ S • - 8a aoo ~° a €$m ii _ f i ~j ,_ 0 s c :~~ ~ ~~g 9 =~s m =et ~s ,s gp~ Q _ ~ ~ ixaluo~ ley! ul4lN^ /uau~/N sraylo~8 6ewoyl ~ ~~ e Jo pue e0uowe~n~ ay~uey u~ ~+3snPUl au~Jy1 ay! +" Jo NalaµJ aul 911a1 4~l4M ezeld a4i Jo ~alueo a~ 0 a • 4~0~ W .Ilai7. ~!~IIBM a eiean o! •I ayioa{go ayl = Z s~~~~~~d ~~ro~s~H ~-: ~:. EXHIB ~~~' ~ f ~.. rr.~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ` i .,.1.,: • , ,~su t~ -_ ____~. C 0 to ~~ ~ 3 0~ w~ C~ ~ C ~~ ~ 0~ *+ G ~~ =H I ~~ 6 e e s~s~4 ~ W W ~d~~d < ~{ i ~,~li e ~ ff l F 6[i14~ J 41 PBt @ ~ zo Z ~ ~~ u a~ ii {ee o w~ ~'E £1 6 NN 333333 U ,~ ~~ d u ui C ~ ~e x N U 6 ,,; Z rao ®~i 4 Y TO p~ F 4 u t s a e C P? ~, e B ~E a ~€E ~ r w ~f $ N ~ c~ € ~E u p ~E w 3 U ~3 W 6 e o ° Oe 0 O® O® Q^ ® e 8 E g • e o' o° o' o be o . e e ~~ - ~~e- JIIIIgil6~h/ _~ I ~z x ~'- ~(e~~ I ~ ~ F ~ b - ~ i~ 9/ 84 rt- _- d9 ~'84 J ~~~~-!mil I E ~ •~ ° ~_ _ ~ ~ E4 ~~ V I I I ~I 11~J~J7~ ~- 64 84 d4 V Up 0 oT i Dv=mo 3 \~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I p m«~ N J c° c ~ I o c o~so ° ° y8';LLa k Q a mp3~= W J U +~ N gmn`o> N N v N Q ~ L L a (7 o°'a_°iE m m v ° m ~ ~ Z N N N> M EXHIBIT H o~m~a • • • 11 11 u • rn w 4' H 5C LL F_Z 2 C7 J ~E A . a a 7 a o a a a a e. a a a : a... aaa. .:aaa:aaa aaa~-aaaaaaaa.. a aaaa. as aa. a.a... .a.. ..a..<.a aa.a. as ..a..a. .aaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaa asaaaaa aaa aaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaa; aoa a .aaaaa:. .a a.a. . ...a.....: .. :....... a .. aaaa a.a aa, a.:. ..aa..... a ..a ..:.a....aa .. .. . a 5: a 9 a ..--: a a: a: a a a ,. a aaa :.. . .aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa a•a s-aa .... a a i a a a ~~ a „ a .. as a __ - :.... .a a - a ..< a as a as ==a ~ia «, . .: a .< a a • .. .. . . i. .4 O' '0. a a : . . O` _ - - a - ~~ f ~-; .. ~ .:... .- -a, a a • . •,r . a ~ -' a . . aa~ .. %a '~- .~ ~ r aa. •- a - a-~ a .~ e P :~ - ~ ~ :. .- a a a a< ..a ao. ~ . -- a a -- - as a-a as aaa«.aaaaa ..aa a .. c ~_ C W ~Z au U, CF ~ tau o} oa m ~' az ~~ UN i4' ~ FO US ~~ b1 p~ O tr • • • • ~~ .K A ~nr N W r X Z J ~ aaaaaaaaaaa>>aaaas~aaaaaaa ~ asaaaaaa ~, -a aaaaaaassaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa = aaa.aaaasaaaaaasaaaaaa a_a aaaaaasa aaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa aaaaaaa - " a'aaaaaaaaaasaa-aaaaa. a°.^a?a aaaaaaa _ 0 aaaaaaaasaassaaaaaaaasaaaa aaaaaaaa -' aasaaaaassaasaaaaaaaa aaaaasaa > aaaaaaaaaaasazaaaaaaa a : aaasaaaa aaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa a4a~a aaaaaaa ~, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaa aaaaa a:tea:. aaaaa aaaaaa as as aaaa as a s aaaaaa a-naa as ,~a a a 9aaaaaaa a s aai ya a is a.a a s ,. a a- :: a a aaaaa a a a a i s a a a a a a a a a a a 7 a 8 a a a ^i , ~ a M• a a a a aaa ; a s a w a ^ aaaaaaa a ' 2 :a: as a a aaaaa - aaaaa as as sa as aaaaaaaaa y aaaa as aaa aaaaa as=a a.a gaaasaa - a a~ ;. i s a i a a a a a a a a a a a aaaa a a a a aaaa aaaa- aaa aaa- ~ aaaaa as a a- >e° n ' .aaaaaa as a a,aa ag .~a,a as a aaaaaa % • a - a ~ aaaaaaa a aaa ~aN a ~ a a _ is - , a aa- __ aaa a-~x~ as aaa _ is aa, aaaaaa ~a a aaa a aaaaaa - ~ a aaa p a aaaaaa a a 4 as _a aaaaaa as a a ~ aaaaaa aa i4 ~a- a Z a a a~ a~ a a aaaaaa as a s a a a- ,. ama a - a a a s a a a a a a a a ® a U aaa as as ~ a a a ~ r aaaaaaasaaaaa a aaaa~aia a w ~ aaaaaaaaaaaaaa a~.aa a- as a s ~ 0 aaaa-aaaaaaaaaa a r aaa- -a - as -a a ~ as aaa aaaaaaa ` ° ~ a a J a s - a a s _ - s~ ~ - a a - a ~ ~ ~ a a _ _ as ___ _a_ - l aaa ~ r as a 4., f Qa ~ as w a a ~ ~ ,a, 5 a - ia a s W a as a a' • ~ ~ a s - aaaa a~ a ' aa aaa a as aa~ -a f ~- - a aaa aaaaa aaa a .~ aaa a u a as as aaa: as aa _ aaa is a -raa 9 7 a : a ~ ~ ~ 2 ~a a r a a 5 S a 3 a a-- a- a a a a a a as a a a a a ado a a a- a a a a a a a a aaaaaasaasaaasaaaaaaaaasa aaaaaaaa - - -- _ ~ - ;--- -- - -- - San Bernardiho"Road '---- --- -- -`' - _=_..~i __~ °'~ ~- _ ~ °- - _ - -- -1 ..::.., . -- __ _ __ _ -::.~ ~ - Le end>;~_~:_._=--r_-- _ _ ~-__ ~ _._ --- I. _-; '.,,:, .-_ - , _ , %.~ - Pynls rdlcn•:m:1(CB/felt' Pear)--~ -~~~.J~- ~: ice.. - 'I '~; j "I; :^' 'I' ~ ' ~ ~a~'`' Placuna raccmorl (California Sycamore) 1 .; Id .. , _ , _ ' : --- fi ~ 1 '' ~~ 1 - - : i : I~, "i ¢ ~~ v _ . I I I I , ~ I I ~ I w I I ~ ---.- ~ ~ ' q~, ~"~ I ~ '. __ < I ~ -_.= i-- _.= I-...- .... _ _~' v ..III y qi ~ .L~' , I ' Ivl - .~.. ~ ~' •~~~~-! ~~ ... ~-_ 1. _ .I I ~ ,l~l ~/. - ~-~_z_. "';'i ~ i^ a 1i .y. i lll: -~j,',:i :.1 . ' ir. ~^i. I!J ..`!~_L ~f.~.'{ "I,~ .Ili ~.1/~11~~ I ii 1 I" , ~ ~J' - I' n'I ' , 1' ' : n i f Ili .._. ~,,I, 1- , I I; I ~ ~ 1 ~ d I 11 ; ~` n f( ~i4 I i' II I I"""' :` f ~ I I I ~ , - Ir,' A _ , _ ' 1,.1 I ' ,z,,. ';~ i I .,, - ~ ._.. ; i ~ ,t III LJ I j' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~-I 3 '„ _~J't_r~.-I t ~ i j _'_ !'i'~~_-4_`i':a' 1 1 -3. ~~ ''I > I ~_. .,... ,. ' ; .-- ~~ -,. ~ -.-_, I _ _ _ 1,-'_:. " .~ -- ' ~ -1 L I - _`_ - .~ ==. _-~.~1:"_ - - I`li-a~'~~:~, ~ ~~~ ., 1. ',,, .T f^I~Ii= -;_`, ,_=~~~.3r-11; ~-!I~1~- I j"~"~~"s:~ I ,.f, 1 'f ._' ~ ( y -{ 1 I i ~ ~~~ ~.~, i ~ ~ I I ~ '' ,, ~ i =1111 ~-j I 1 I ~ ^ "Fresh & Easy ~_ I ~ l~l i , i I ~ ~ ' t r, I ~. ~ 17 1 ~ „ I , 1 ,! 1 'i -I' ,1,'I I ,. _ __ ~,:_ ~ ._ ,~ ' ~ ; . , ,- f ,. _, ~.. - f .: ,. ' _'-s<- , : _I ~-, 1 I fl ~w..,~...,, i' ~ I ~~Il,~ , • I ,I ', _Histonc Thomas Brothers Wine ,, -?- ail _- ~ r :I : i ;i I, ~ - { . __ I I I iry__ ~_ 1. Y I I I. I I h l y 1 ~= 1_.,. - III c.,l _ I i l 1 ~;~ ~_I ~,~; !1111 ~!~ ~ ~, Ili ;~~ ~~~~ ~ I. ~~. ~,,. I ! : I t-~ - I- .. ~_ ' 1 I - ~^ .. ~! 1 T I lei 1 1 .I 1 .I ~^ \: 1~~'I,:L~f?I ~,~%'~~ if ';:fir: ~~ctf=-' - ~ ~i il~~'!i ~ ;:yi i I i ~ l,~ ib -_ ~~~~~ --:~ ~ ~:~ :, ~r-"~ ________~ - -J ~~I~ii ~ ~ ._ _ s - 1'-, L. -: i _' ' -' '~ -1-~~: i ~-L~ II Il ill li -;~~ !' ~~~.- ::i-_--`-~` I °I S~ I sI r it'' El i~'+. , I ^l~n ~ ' r- - --. ...-.... ` ..1 - J`~ _ ~. = -- - - - - - - - - Foothill Boulevard --_ ~ :--- - - ... . _ - _-_ _ __ _ _ -_ - - - -.-,:~ ~ 't .. - -- - .. - - - ~ Site Plan north Note: Colored trees to be removed; outlined existing trees to remain. A, B,&C- 30 • • • k ~ [ 8 ~g tl ge ~~ 5 g gQ ~~ ~ g g (g # S ~ K `~ L'tN :b gs ~ p ,..., ~ c~d u~ 4 s ~ P ~ S bb Ey i~S ~ ~ ~ ~g a ~ ~ ri ~ . z .. 2 Y S ~ ~~p C 7 ~ ~ F g ~ F ~~ @ ~ ` ~ ~ 55 [Q @p E 5[~ F g ' f ~ _$ ~: Y o c r~~ rv~ e5 : c _a~ x ~ x cc 'seas pp 4~ ~y 9 ~~ i y `F4N^ "' ] i d~j:.: J adC w ~ F y n p fi_ i ged q ~$~?_ u7 §8 ~ RY ~ e'.b~~ S ~ ~~~, •,~ t~ i' :~~: "~ ~~ ~. s l U ,. ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ 6 .. •~ ?l I~ CL (A ~ 1' v_ ~ :: I Z W z ~ U p I - ~ I~ 'Y d ~ ¢ 2 , ~~ , ~ ~ ~ w m r~:F~.W; ~~ > ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ J Z G z .~~ ° v,l ¢ "II ~ d ¢ W ¢ O ~.' WL ,. ~~ ' X - ZOO ~ ,..t , Z, , ~ '>i i O U ..i~ I„~ : ~ I . . LL O U ,, ~ ": I . U Ind' ~ W ; ,~o'*'mll~ ~ ~ • . J ~ Ir '--.5_r- `_ ~_•. ~i EXHl61~ J U o a o i $ o ~ L Ztzu G ~V V u a ~< c > Z~ Y ~ C } ~ f U 3 ; m 5 S 2, 8g = F i' :._ d. :CT h ~ ~_ ill u ~ ~: SS 5~ l~ ][ `~~11 ~" J1 ~ ba~a Ir`i sal ~~r5 y .=yy41 ~~g~ n.. a :a,, E eee, ~^ _ ~~ .. 31 G ~s .~. ~ ~„ `Z O o v _ N ~ U j o F~ goy ~ _ ~ ~'~ z ~ a 3 ~y '^.~ y ~ u a r. C _ ~~ 5 ~~ o ° e a ~~ ~ r o rc ~ a~ &{! ~ u °a z O JL YD O Gam' t y ~1' ~y V < ~ }£ ~F% ~'~ N ~ F O ~ O F ~ Sr @: ~ ~ 3 i r ~ . g§ :€A ~ ~ eY ~ @$5' d [ a 3 a 3 O 'p ~~ ~~ g J Jpz £ Y p p 62 ' ~ _R 5 V`~ff ~i P ~~ ~ S ~ fi ~ ~ , ~ Y ~ 3 ~ t~ 6~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ A~ ~G ~~ ~ E 3 ~ !~ Y ~~ 3 s ~ kypp P s -~ . ~ 3 ! -.... .. k ' y ~ ~ g ' ~eB . ¢ ~~ a ~I c? a eeen f'. s i ~ Ey F ~ :?_~_ ~ ~ @bS ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~~ 'v E 5 . } ~ g: • ~ n. . ~ I ~ i @ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~E? FY E"s ~k ' 4 r ~ 4 ~ .1 + ~ ' ~ @~ s €. ~a ~. . a 5 p5 ~ u , @ ~' gg C € s 4 $ ~ \~~1 a r~ i~ v 5u a `~ ~'n.~ C cs 11 . ~ wl r " `m~ Pa ~a ; a ,y N~` ;. A _p y tl , ~ -" - el' ~4e ~ j j , g , $~~ G§ ~ ~ ~ E oeo S H5 ~ - 32 • • 1I ,, u .1. ~"' i- *~' I~% ~~;. ~7 ire ..x ~--' ~ -. -- -. -:-.r-.-. N U Y z u 0 gA G C b 4 ~ Q g ~£g°g `e .e= a 9~ fY eG @ $ r e b~o S 36~ ~K g§ !§ ~S p £ ~ 8 e ~ 3 ~ p~!~ c t Qa a are @e _§~ a 6~$ '~ a§ "qB ~° d g ~ s e~ ~ ~ i Y y 8 6..Y Ye g Y Y gg Y p is~@ ~ ~°~ 3' 3~@~ 8~ ~~ ~ e @; ~ ~s C ~ Y f y5 $~ 3 E Yy 5 a p4 ~ i 5 @ ~ 9 ~ e i Fg Y € tly ,} ~ Se~Pp ~ d~~ d' d26 5@ Y~ @ ~: 3s w C C ~ _ ° ~ Y k ~ 3 E Y ~ e Z ~ g ~ i E i p ~ ~ ~ § 3 E ~i 6 9 °§?e a ~`be5 ~H `qi eb p6p" €° e~ b d~ a i i ti tl e Y%~ Y&% e"' e G Y t 'l i s s s Y S s s s ~ i ~g:z3 §Y zssS zY z$§$~:6~?S~§~~sFw ~~~;.~b5g5axa eee€e~ 55g °g OOOOOo0000000000000000000®w' ~' ~~ , ~, ,. -- . ~; ~ - -. ~~ .~ <_ ~1 .~_~Y ~~ ;# .~ m EXHIBIT K ~~ s~~~ ~:~ ~ ~~~5 ~. is __ . ; ,f, ~ y i V' ~ i ~, r ,d ~~ ~ h n ~ .r ~~p'` I <~'~' ~. ,i r t -> 'r ~~ ~~- ~ , , i„ ..:I_ ~ .. ~.~., ~ ~~_ - -r -:-"-. ~. .OVOtl~ONIOtltlNtl38~;N`dS' --"---`-- -- -'~~-= ~~' - _;~ yam- -:n~_-~ __' ._i~_;j i- ; - - _ ~~ ~s,. ...'-' f__n F. Rr. - y ~i _ Y ~I'~{~{t~~ .Y31r~~-s,}~S~ •~ '~~ ~ III ~~~ -~~ ~.;,~~J lj l~~Ij~i/.',~~jw~?;,;,.I it f. ,.,?~;r ~i A ~~ " 'ie:js{'; ,, ~~Ii(~4 fd,krj " a~_ ... ...., ~~ 11~~i9~ ~f~ , 111"i~_ ~~- _ ~ ~~~\\~i ~° - " ~'~~ 484 ~i'?1 ~~IV b4 -7...: a:. _ .~~ ~^I+..._ ~E. _ '~'~fl,_.t 4-P~~ -I'r _- ___ .,a. .. ) _ ""r.~,.~{~-~_ _-II is J. ,.~- ~ m ~ - ,~,I~f .,; ~ r ~f~" ~ ..,.,,. I~ k ~ b I I ~, ~~ I Vs ~ i~~? ~. ~~~• ~ _i i~~ 'ray F"/...ft L -t~ ~ F ~' I-S~ii-. rn ~ ~ ~ ~'~ _ ~ i r ~~, V L. r i II y I' F~ Er. 1111:: FI ~ _- __ ~ _- _- u~~ -~~ _ hl.. ,~ ' I ~. J- - - - ~~- ~_ , ,...T~ . , ,., .. - _ _ _. - ... T , ~~ I. !1 0 ~ i • • ~'I I I ~~ o ~° ~ ~- g ~~ '<~ .... -.. ... ~,... ~~' r ~, j yi • • y~'~4. ~ i~- ;iT'7='i iar ~v~j l,~~'~- ~.~s. j C~_;.1 '.- ~ ~•i1'' '~ ~ ~dfi I ~ .~ ~I'!~I .iV~ `-.r1~- :~~ ~i~{_. .~ ~'I_, ~~: ~.~T~. r~7:~~`{/~(li:~jlf~ ~,k.i:.i-~a l~.?wf:'.j r ~~~,,. --_ .-,- y!'~ i ' ~, -.,:._ ,._~~~ -__,.-! !, r ~s ! ~~t" i i F3'f'Y ~ F~,'r:`f ~~,~,.:,i ., `:il~ ~,u ~ .ii! n .e:"" f r'i. ~ ~~' ~~~ t- r t. ~u.a' ;.E ~7;Eq.~7;'(.~i~1'S~d~jLl; J=- :-- it ~'~!' I,, .~'. i/ _ - _-i.; i i :~~! 4'r _I' ~i^ii ~-~_+ {~-{~i~-~1~j-Imr-' !~_ __y;~ - g !_ ._ _ -„ ..i !~ ~ it ,r_ I {irk - - ;::; -,,;~- y ~ ~ ..,..:1,~ ~,.. ~, . I ~ ~N~- ¢d ~ ~ ~~ bq '~~~, ~~ ! 4K ~! r-- ~,. r' ' - _~ ~ __ ~ - r ~ ~ ~ OAl9 llIHl00~',1 - - ' ~!- - ` _- j- - - - ri~c ,1 'i- Y ~i .~. ~~:~ x ~~~. ~~~~~~~~~~~ a e e ~~~ o~ e _ ~ -- f- - _ _ ..._._._ . _ _.._ _ _ ___.L,, ____. __.._. -__...._ ~OtlOki~OMalitlNFi3B'NVS : _- _- - --F~=-- " ~ ~g r . ~.. ,~. . L., ~ r~ I Y ±,• f I 1 .,.Y ~ ~ r~ ~ '. ~ t ~ ~_ 3 ~ ~`' I ~i.7N SF'bp~~ ia,~ J g ~; _ ~~ ~ ~r_~c~' r ~ t I`~n o it n~ 3iv~~ ~~I~fe~~~i~ ~ ' ['' ' i ~ ~,+~, ~ ` _ . . ,. ~ r .~, ~ ~ ~ - ~`µy~[~ „ I I f r6 ~ ~A BI S -1' ' . '~ _ ,__ s _ ~______` .. dAl9 llIHlOOj~__~___-_-__-__~-t- .~~. ~, u °i 1 • • ,~ g§ z~. ins `s ~ e e _Y~B F g c6 ''~l ~e ` 8 n O I ! II tl~ q o 3 R w~ z CP • ! {'~ • FOOTHILL BOULEVARD E_ II z.em sr I,wa sr '.A : l `ali SF I.KO 5f IAM Sr. (~ I I I I I I I ' I I ' I ' ' f I I ' I ' I ' IAW ... \\ V I '-'~I I I -(.{ b- I r-}~ ~ ~~ , i -,- I ~-,., I -O I UII L.oo c . I.wa s.r. I.aLO Sf U ~ ~ ~ ~ U V 1 I I I U -l I.1 O I :~- ~' o ^ LUO fI II 1I II'h1' II II ''r~'I O ~ i"a' .~/ 1 LI V I I O O :~ -IIII ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~II~ III UUI~I~IIIIIIIIIIIIU -_ ': Lae _S I I ~ s :x V^ ~~ a v y o P a ~ m q f~ 54N BERNAOINO RO/.D • EXHI~l1' L 1 ~I + :~' ..~ lnwl- Helucatmq to HnilJin~Ti ~, - '~ r F1~B- < Z < -~_- r :F,L~ t ~ ilVntul__ the CCI1tCf n ~~. 0 > '~ ~'~ ~ `. g H:n'en Chn'nprnctic- a \llcahne the Center ~'r+ ~ .-Vllannlo'F Relocating lu Iiuilding D . ~~ ".f Y Attuhun Financi:d- A f~~;~ i ~ \ ncnllne the Centel nf~~ - ~"~I 1 , , aau p ~'1'~~'~`Idli I~'~I~6~I ~~9 ~~. "~r° + with ~, 1 Hau'SccretH- I edmed FeLm.dlon < 1-r~N ~ d~ ' tine N N:lil~- i:< v.~ Declinrd helocatlen A, B,&C- 38 10/u9/2008 15:10 F.4.X 1102742150 LEGG ?L9SON REI 071002 Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. 70880 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1750 • ~ Los Angeles, LA 90024 370-234-2100 Ms. lames R. Troyer Planning Director 10500 Civic Center Dm•e P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 October 8, 2008 Dear Mr. Troyer, Thank you for your hard work and that of the rest of the Planning Department iu making the vision for the rejuvenation of the Thomas Winery Plaza become a reality. Needless to say, we remain excited about the positivt impact our collective investment of time and funding will have on this center, the business prospects for tenants, for our investors, and the contribution it will have on the further beautification of this area of Rancho Cucamonga. • At your request I am providing you with an update on the progress and schedule of tenant relocations at the Thomas Winery Plaza. 'two tenants, Antonino's and Yatai Sushi, will be relocated to other spaces in the center which we have held vacant for this pwpose. One other tenant, She `N Nails, has a lea~,c valid through October 2010 and has been <.rr ..,.r ...t,,,....:,....,r...,......a ....y..,,,. ; L,,.,,w, a..an.,.a .,<..on.. ~r~ rmn., .,,y....~ ..., have agreed to the early termination of llreir ]ease. W e have worked closely with Antonino' + to find suitable space for his restaurant and have agreed to provide funds for the relor ation. The owner of Antonino's has been waiting years for the chance to invest new money in his restaurant and will take the opportunity presented by the relocation t.+ make additional cosmetic improvements as well as to divide the new space to create .t ballroom for special functions. The schedule for the Antonino's relocati~ nl, prepazed w ANTOI~TNO'S Com letion Sco to of Work Completed Initial Interior Inspection Completed initial Cosmetic Improvetent Yl ~r~ Wed 10/15/08 Second Interior Inspection Wed 10/22/08 Second Cosmetic Improvement i'lans Wed 10/29/08 Permits Yor Interior Improvemen~s Mon 11/3/08 interior Renovation Begins Mon 12/29/08 Interior Renovation Ends Mon 1!5/09 Final enin^ Pte oration Co Meted • A, B,&C- 39 ith the owner, is as follows: 10/09/2008 15:)1 FAS 3102792150 LEGG MASON REI r~oo3 I The schedule for the Xatai Sushi relocation, repared wil XATAI SUSFII Completion Scope of Work Completed Initiallnterior lnspedion Completed InidalReloea[ionPlans Completed Second Interior Ins pcdion Wed 10/15/08 SccondRclocationPlans Thur10/30/08 Pcrmi~ForRclocationImprov~~~nen[s Tue 11/4/08 Relocation Begins Tuc 1J16/2008 Relocation Ends Tue 12/23/08 Fina] Opining P[epantion Conipletcd h the owner, is as fol}ows: Our curre~ntt~schedule for thef~ove7r~all project has~}h~eld ste~1ad+y sincerhMay of this yeaz and ~~~ t~~'CN~nt}.1~ic~~C~~1L7S~Gn~Fie~~l~lt~~ t24Y~~~Yf[d[.Q.~l~~~'tl~ty~wb~L~~;id- and while the work maybe completed sooner, we have left in the more conservative estimates, so as to allow for any delays. Thank you for your continued support of this investment to rejuvenate this historically significant center. We look forward to tl.e coming months of hard work and the grand opening in late June 2009. Sincerely, /~'. Brian Corbell Vice President Legg Mason heal Estate Investors • A,B,&C- 40 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • Time 7:00 Mayuko Nakajima September 16, 2008 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Development and design review of the Thomas Winery Plaza by adding a 13,969 sq. ft commercial/grocery building and demolition of two non-historic commercial buildings of 13,828 sq. ft with additional site, landscaping and signage changes in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 2) at the Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue; APN 0208-101-22, 23, 24, 25. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019; Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590; Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588; Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591. Design Parameters: The subject project is located at the Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue at the existing Thomas Winery Plaza. This area is designated "Specialty Commercial (SC)" within the Foothill Boulevard Districts. Projects within this particular SC zone are to complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme through architecture and specialty uses, which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience, which is unique to this particular area. Project Description and Architectural Design: The applicant has been working with Staff to incorporate as many elements to the project to enhance the historic winery theme through the Design Review process. This has been done through incorporating materials for the new Fresh & Easy building that complement the Thomas Winery building such as river rock, shingle roofing, and the use of trellis enhancements to soften the appearance of blank wall planes of the • building. The applicant also proposes an "enhancement" for the whole center by repainting the existing buildings that are complementary to the Winery and Fresh & Easy building with various shades of green, ivory, mauve and brown. The project also introduces an upgrade to the existing Uniform Sign program, which introduces new monument signs and an entry gateway arch, with materials that mimic the still building. The historic artifacts that are currently dispersed throughout the plaza will remain in place with the exception of the "kettle" and one historic informational sign, which will be relocated just a few feet away. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: There are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Staff has identified several secondary issues for discussion: The exterior lighting plan for the site exceeds the maximum light standard of 15 feet. The applicant would like to take an average of the standard height by using 12-foot lightpoles through the main accessway and using 18-foot lightpoles in parking areas. As a result, the photometric plan shows various areas that indicate illumination that exceeds the maximum 5-foot candles. The applicant shall demonstrate why using the 15-foot height standard would not be viable. 2. Suitability of the amendment to the existing Uniform Sign Program #88: Monument sign, Entry Gateway Arch, Project I.D. Sign, Fresh & Easy signs, and tenant signs. EXFiI~IT M A,B,&~- 4, 3. The corner site plan shall be designed to accommodate the pedestrian and create visual • interest while incorporating improvements indicated in the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan such as brick concrete pavers. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened by the parapet. 2. All signs are subject to the City's Sign Ordinance. 3. All colors, materials, and textures shall complement the established architectural theme of the historic Thomas Winery building and still building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved subject to the above comments. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Stewart, Munoz, and Nicholson Staff Planner: Mayuko Nakajima The Committee directed the applicant to revise the application as follows and resubmit • the application for afollow-up review as a consent item: 1. The applicant demonstrated why using the 18-foot height lightpole would be more practical than the 15-foot height standard. The Committee felt comfortable in recommending the applicant to submit a Variance application for the 3-foot height increase. 2. The Committee appreciated the signs proposed and recommended no changes to the design at this time (Monument sign, Entry Gateway Arch, Project I.D. Sign). 3. Create more articulation on the corner with a "terraced" river rock feature to produce depth. A, B,&C- 42 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Mayuko Nakajima October 14, 2008 DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. -Development and Design Review of the Thomas Winery Plaza by adding a 13,969 square foot commercial/grocery building and demolition of two non-historic commercial buildings of 13,828 square feet with additional site, landscaping, and signage changes in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts (Subarea 2), located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, and 25. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 2b categorical exemption because the project includes replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2007-01019, Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590, Uniform Sign Program DRC2008-00588, Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, and Variance DRC2008-00761. Backoround: This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on September 16, 2008. At that time, staff presented the project and the Committee directed the applicant to revise the application as follows and resubmit the application for afollow-up review as a Consent item: 1. The applicant demonstrated why using the 18-foot height lightpola would be more practical than the 15-foot height standard. The Committee felt comfortable in recommending the applicant to • submit a variance application for the 3-foot height increase. 2. The Committee appreciated the signs proposed and recommended no changes to the design at this time (Monument sign, Entry Gateway Arch, Project I.D. Sign). 3. Create more articulation on the corner with a "terraced" river rock feature to produce depth. The applicant revised as follows: 1. The applicant submitted a variance application for an increased light standard height. 2. Sign designs are the same, but the applicant has revised the height to conform to the current Sign Ordinance. 3. The applicant has proposed a modification of the previously proposed corner plan that exhibits more depth by creating a "terraced" river rock feature as recommended by the Design Review Committee. The following features were revised: The river rock walls are terraced at two levels with an 18-inch high wall in the triangular planter area beneath the Corner ID sign and approximately 4-foot high retaining wall elsewhere as currently existing at this location. This results in the sign to be slightly lower than first proposed to create articulation and depth. b. Berming was added to help merge the sign into the river rock wall. • c. Geometric stamped brick pattern concrete was added to create uniformity and add visual interest to the corner. EXHIBIT N A,B,&C- 43 DRC AGENDA DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 14, 2008 Page 2 d. The stamped brick pattern concrete is now incorporated into the parking court to maintain continuity. e. A Route 66 logo was added to fit inside one of the geometric grids. f. The number of lighted bollards was increased from four to six. g. Double row of Crape Myrtle trees were added on each street frontage. h. Two Chinese Pistache trees were added to line up with the Crape Myrtle trees. These accent trees help define the corner. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval and forwarding to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Mayuko Nakajima Members Present: • • A, B,&C- 44 RESOLUTION NO. 08-01 • A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY .OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LANDMARKALTERATION PERMIT DRC2008-00591, TO RELOCATE THE HISTORIC ARTIFACTS AT THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, 25. A. Recitals. 1 Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Alteration Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Comrriission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.120.G of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a The application applies to 4 parcels located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue south of San Bernardino Road, an overall area of about 11.6 acres with a street frontage along Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, and San Bernardino Road of about 500 feet, 580 feet and 500 feet, respectively, and is presently improved with the historic Thomas Winery artifacts; and b. The property to the north of the subject site issingle-family residential; the property to the south consists of commercial buildings comprised of a gas station and a food establishment; the property to the east is an older shopping plaza; and the property to the west is a recent shopping plaza called Vineyard Gateway; and c. The Thomas Winery, on the property of the proposed application, was designated as an Historic Landmark by the City Council on December 19, 1979, and • d The application proposes to rearrange the Thomas Winery artifacts that are currently dispersed throughout the plaza. A, B,&C- 45 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-01 DRC2008-00591 October 22, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the. specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the Landmark Alteration Permit, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department \J 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, Uniform • Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 2) The project must be completed as per Site Plan "D5 Historic Artifacts Site Layout." 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 22nd day of October 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: A, B,&C- 46 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-01 D R C2008-00591 October 22, 2008 • Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • A, B,&C- 47 RESOLUTION NO. 08-55 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00587 IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS (SUBAREA 2), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF- APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, AND 25. A. Recitals. 1. Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2008-00587, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolutioh are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 4 parcels located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue south of San Bernardino Road, an overall area of about 11.6 acres with a street frontage along Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, and San Bernardino Road of about 500 feet, 580 feet and 500 feet, respectively; and b. The property to the north of the subject site issingle-family residential; the property to the south consists of commercial buildings comprised of a gas station and a food establishment; the property to the east is an older shopping plaza; and the property to the west is the Vineyard Gateway shopping plaza; and c. The applicant proposes to demolish two non-historic buildings (a combined floor area of 13,828 square feet), construct a new Fresh & Easy building (13,969 square feet), relocate existing tenants to vacant suites within the center, reconfigure the parking lot, upgrade the existing exterior facades, and incorporate landscape and signage changes within the existing Thomas Winery commercial plaza; and • d. The convenience-related commercial/grocery use contemplated is a permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as determined in a previous Use Determination; and A,B,&C- 48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-55 DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 2b exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (categorical exemption) because the project includes replacement of a commercial structure with a new structure of substantially the same size, purpose, and capacity. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, • and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with the staff's determination of exemption. 5. .Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approve the demolition of two non-historic buildings (a combined floor area of 13,828 square feet) and the construction of a new commercial building (13,969 square feet) in the Specialty Commercial District (Subarea 2), located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. 2) Approve the amendment to the Uniform Sign Program #88 (DRC2008-00588) which includes new site signage and implementation to upgrade the existing tenant signs. All signs shall require review and approval of a Sign Permit application by the Planning Director prior to installation. 3) Approve Tree Removal Permit DRC2008-00590 for the removal of 54 trees in conjunction with the Development Review. 4) Demolition permit for the existing two buildings may be issued in • December 2008, on the condition that demolition is not to commence until the latter of: 1) January 15, 2009, pursuant to the approval of the Building Official and Planning Director, or2) the relocated tenants have A, B,&C- 49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-55 DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 • Page 3 been issued a certificate of occupancy for their new location or other satisfactory evidence submitted to the City at its sole discretion. 5) Incorporate improvements specified in the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan applicable to the development of properties along Foothill Boulevard subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval including street lights and street trees as specified in the Standard Conditions. 6) Stamped concrete brick pattern paving for the site and the corner enhancement per the material board and site plan shall be included with the construction of the new building. 7) The landscaping (street trees and parking lot) and lighting shall be installed with the construction of the new building. 8) The two Chinese Pistache trees on the corner shall be 48-inch box. 9) Re-painting the exterior facades shall occur no later than one year after the release of final occupancy of the commercial building. Enqineering Department • 1) The Foothill Boulevard frontage to be designed in accordance with the City adopted Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan subject to City Engineer and Planning Director approval including street lights, street trees, special artwork features, and accent paving at the northeast corner and Route 66 icons. Said enhancement area shall be maintained by the developer and shall be included in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. a) Existing street lights along Foothill Boulevard shall be replaced with the required street lights per the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan. 2) Vineyard Avenue frontage improvements shall be installed per City Standards: a) Provide street trees as required 3) The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel or process an appropriate lot line adjustment. 4) The development requires installation of fiber optics conduits, vaults, and manholes on Vineyard Avenue per City Standard Plans 135-137. Also, the improvement plans need to show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes using Standard • Plans 135-137. 5) A Water Quality Management Plan must be completed, approved, notarized and recorded prior to issuance of the grading permit. A, B,&C- 50 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-55 DRC2008-00587 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October, 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • u A,B,&C- 51 n~~~~S .-: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00587 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE - LOCATION: APN: 0208-101-22, 23. 24. 25. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements con,oleaon mate 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _!_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-55, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties Involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below. The /_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X • S C-1-OS I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-005875tdCond to-22.doc A, B,&C- 52 Protect No. DRC2008-00587 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1 Variance / Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or _/_/_ approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first • 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 11. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured _/_/_ products. L\PIP.NNING\FINAl1PLNGCCPA"d\2008 Res 8 Stf rep1DRC2008-00587StdCond .0-22 doc A, B,&C- 53 Protect No DRC2008-00587 Completion Date D. Shopping Centers • 1 A uniform hardscape and street furniture design Including seating benches, trash receptacles, _/_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, Ilght bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Provide for the following desigri features In each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the _/_/_ Planning Director a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the protect) _/_/_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/_/_ d Roll-up doors / / e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. _/_/_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. _/_/_ g Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view 3. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. / / 4. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. • 5. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." _/_/_ 6. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level -All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an _/_/ exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p m until 7 a m. and 65 dB during the _ hours of 7 a m. until 10 p.m. b Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or _/_/_ other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area 7 Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. _/_/_ They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 8 All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be _/_/_ included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of building permits 9 The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures 10. All future projects within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent _/_/_ with the architectural program established. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOPAM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00587StdCOnd 10-22.doc A,B,&C- 54 Project No DRC2008-00587 Comolehon Date 11 Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend Into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 12 Cart corrals shall be provided for temporary storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Plarning Commission. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each workday. E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, Including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be Included in building plans. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2 All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet G. Trip Reduction Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided In all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number / / • - -/- / / -/- - / / / / / / --- • / / / / / / / / • L\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep1DRC2008-00587StdCond 10-22.doc A,B,&C- 55 Project No DRC2008-00587 2. Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If • covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. 3 Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. 4 Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval In the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the'Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking • stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2' 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet In vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2.1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOD/1M\20n8 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2008-00587Stdcond 10-22 doc Completion Date -~- - - -~- -~- - / / / / -~- - -~-~. -~-~- / / A,B,&C- 56 Protect No DRC2008-00587 Comoletion Date 9 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _!_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the • Engineering Department 10 Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. ' 11. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 12. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department I. Signs 1 A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director reviewand _/_/_ approval prior to issuance of building permits. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _!_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) K. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, waterandwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2008-00587) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. • L`.PLANNING\FINAL`,PLNGCC~."M\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-00587StdCond 10-22.doc A,B,&C- 57 Protect No DRC2008-00587 Completion Dale 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. • 4 Se arate ermits are re uired for fencin and/or walls / / . p p q g . _ _ _ 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. L. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2008-00587). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to' City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance 3 Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ • counter) M. Ne w Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_!_ Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_I_ N. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _!_/_ Standards. and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. • 7 11PLANNINGIFINAL\PWGCCMhT2008 Fes & Slf rep\DRC200a-00587SldCond 10-22doc A,B,&C- 58 Project No. DRC2008-00587 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Foothill Boulevard X X Vineyard Avenue X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item Improvement Plans and Construction. a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Completion Date / / - -~ -~- . -~-~- • ~- - -~-~ / / I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Sif rep\GRC200&-00587Stdcond 10-22.doc A, B,&C- 59 Protect No. DRC2008-00587 d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at Intersections for future traffic signals and • interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes' 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open-to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks: Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall Include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Foothill Boulevard Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybnd- 8' 15' O C. 24' Box Fill Activity Centers 'Muskogee' Lavender Triangula In r Spacing Vineyard Avenye Podacarpus henkelii Long-leafed Yellow Wood 3' 20' O.C. 15 Gal FIII Under Utilities In Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P\P CANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2008-005875tdCcnd 10-22 doc Completion Date -~- - -~- - -~-~- / / -~- - -~-~- -~- - -~- A.B.&C- 60 Protect No. DRC2008-00587 Completion Date P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _/_/ • Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective /_/_ Beautification Master Plan Foothill Boulevard. G2. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _1_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary _/_/_ 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_!_ Approval of the fnal parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements and Approvals • 1 The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one _/_!_ parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 10 I \PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM~2008 P.es & Sti rep1DRC2008-00587StdCond iG22doc A,B,&C- 61 ~.,o,,,; ~~- .. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection • ~ = District ,~ h~ Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 23, 2008 Fresh & Easy 8916 Foothill Blvd. DRC2008-00587 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us/fire/index.htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the article. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply • 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300- feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet. b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required • fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. A, B,&C- 62 FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed • is 1625 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. ~. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. • FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 15~ story exterior wall shall be located • within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. A, B,&C- 63 2 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are • a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. c. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f'. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. p. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. li. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. • ;. Access Doorways. Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercialllndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. • c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. A, B,&C- .64 c. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. • g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of • the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. c. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. b. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan • check. A, B,&C- 65 4 Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). • FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. Compressed Gases Refrigeration Systems Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to equipment designed to store, use or dispense California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing other implemented and/or adopted standards. construction of buildings and/or the installation of hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. • All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. A, B,&C- X66 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of • the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services"'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating • the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted • and/or equipment is placed in service. A, B,&C- 67 b 6. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular . gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by • Fire Construction Services. 7. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 3. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 9. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/~' x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the • standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • A,B,&C- 68 - City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department ' J , ~ 10500 Civic Center Dr. _ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909)477-2710 F: (909)477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT & RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: DRC2008-00587 Type: Retail -Grocery Store Location: Fresh-n-Easy Store at the Thomas Winery Plaza Planning Department: MAYUKO NAKAJINA APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, E Meeting Date: September 16, 2008 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: Note: Building and Safety -Grading will review and comment on future submittals for this project. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS -Standard Building and Safety -Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1. All City of Rancho Cucamonga standard grading conditions apply to this project. B. COMMENTS -The following items shall be corrected /completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing: 1. C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS L~, (/ WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ~~ 1. A water quality management plan must be completed, approved, notarized and recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. I'1BUI~DING\PERMITS\DRC2D07-01019\DRC2008-D0587 Grading Commitlea_Projecl Report, 200d0916.doc 1 of 1 A, B,&C- 69 RESOLUTION NO. 08-56 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2008-00781 TO INCREASE THE PARKING LIGHTPOLE HEIGHT STANDARD FROM 15 FEET TO 18 FEET FOR DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00587 LOCATED IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0208-101-22, 23, 24, AND 25. A. Recitals. 1. Legg Mason Real Estate Investors, Inc. filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2008-00781 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 4 parcels located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue south of San Bernardino Road, an overall area of about 11.6 acres with a street frontage along Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, and San Bernardino Road of about 500 feet, 580 feet, and 500 feet, respectively; and b. The property to the north of the subject site issingle-family residential; the property to the south consists of commercial buildings comprised of a gas station and a food establishment; the property to the east is an older shopping plaza; and the property to the west is the Vineyard Gateway shopping plaza; and c. The applicant proposes to install parking light poles with the height of 18 feet, a 3-foot increase to the height standard of 15 feet in conjunction with Development Review DRC2008-00587. The additional height is necessary to provide better lighting distribution. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: A, B,&C- 70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-56 DRC2008-00781 - LEGG MASON REA ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 • Page 2 a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code, in that a 15-foot height limit would cause a 20 percent increase in the number of fixtures within the parking areas because of light distribution dynamics, which would result in a more cluttered parking environment not consistent with the historic Winery theme. Also, the higher fixtures will be more efficient and provide more visibility in the drive corridors for public safety purposes. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. In that, retaining the historic Thomas Winery atmosphere must be considered when creating a plaza with a "village-like" setting. The 12-foot high pedestrian scale fixtures help promote this atmosphere. Parking courts should be distinguished from this streetscape, in part, by 18-foot high fixtures which contrast the on-site pedestrian-ways with vehicle parking courts. To make all light fixtures a uniform 15-foot height throughout the site, would defeat this visual design objective and the 20 percent increase in number of fixtures would add visual clutter and standard "strip center" appearance in lieu of a more creative design acknowledgement of the "Shopping Village" theme that this property offers. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. In that, adjacent and nearby commercial sites reveal fixture heights in excess of 15 feet in this area of • the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, such as the adjacent center to the east and south of the project site. This development includes a light fixture combination of 12-foot and 18-foot high fixtures which enhances the historic winery theme and reinforces the Foothill Boulevard Corridor design guidelines. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. In that, the height increase will allow the property to utilize a much higher quality light fixture package than nearby commercial properties, unique to the historic and architectural qualities to the Thomas Winery Plaza. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. In that, the 18-foot parking lot lighting photometric plan demonstrated that by increasing the height by 3 feet, the increased lighting levels in the drive lanes would provide for a safer driving and pedestrian space. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 2c exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 (categorical exemption) because replacement of the parking light fixtures from the existing is a negligible increase in capacity and in addition, there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. a. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission . concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the variance application. A, B,&C- 71 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-56 VAR DRC2008-00781 - LEGG MASON REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC. October 22, 2008 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the increase in the parking light pole standard from 15 feet to 18 feet, in conjunction with Development Design Review DRC2008-00587. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October, 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman A,B,&C- 72 - ~ ' T H E, C I T Y O F R A N C II O C U C A.M O N G~A Staff Report DATE: October 22, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Donald Granger, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of • environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Offce Buildings; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District, Subarea 6) South - Existing Office Buildings; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District, Subarea 6) East - Existing Warehouse Building;'Industrial Park (Subarea 6) West - Universal Technical Institute; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District, Subarea 6) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park West - Industrial Park C. Site Characteristics: The 2 97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Immediately east of the project site is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for • automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is ITEM D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 2 vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition- or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. D. Parkin Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces T e of Use Foota a Ratio Re wired Provided Hotel N/A 1/Room 122 123 ANALYSIS: • A. Land Use Summary and Operations: The 122-room hotel will offer breakfast, outdoor dining area with fireplace, pool and spa, outdoor barbeque, fire pit and seating area with enhanced paving. The applicant's permit consultant, Charles Joseph Associates, has indicated to staff that the hotel will offer the incidental serving of beer and wine. The Development Code permits the incidental serving of beer and wine in conjunction with the issuance of a Type 41 license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). A Type 41 License (On Sale Beer and Wine-Eating Place) authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on the licensed premises with the stipulation that the owner must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Under a • Type 41 License, minors are permitted on the premises. Condition of Approval No. 3 in the Draft Resolution of Approval requires that should the hotel operator wish to offer distilled spirits or operate a bar at a future date, the Development Code requires the filing of a Conditional Use Permit and the issuance of all applicable ABC license(s). B. Workforce Operations and Hours: The hotel operator anticipates that the hotel workforce will consist of 5 Office/Managerial employees (9 a.m. to 5 p.m.); a Housekeeping/Maintenance Team of 17 employees (8 a.m. to 4 p.m.); Front Desk Morning Team (2 employees per shift from 7 a.m. to 3 p.m.); Front Desk Afternoon Team (2 employees per shift from 3 p.m. to 11 p.m.) and 1 Night Auditor (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.) In total, depending on occupancy, the total number of employees at the hotel is estimated at 32. C. Architecture and Site Design: The applicant is proposing afour-story, 122-room hotel, utilizing the following exterior materials: brushed metal (2 shades), smooth stucco, grey ceramic tile, glass and E.I.F.S. The design includes a pone-cochere with a metal canopy using interlocking zinc panels, outdoor fireplace and trellis feature at the west elevation, decorative concrete at both entry points, and an outdoor plaza at the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The hotel design showcases an urban-inspired tower element at the northwest corner of the building, utilizing brushed metal, glass and angled roof element that provides a focal point. All pedestrian crosswalks are designed with decorative concrete. Sixth Street will also include an attractive bus shelter that incorporates design elements of the hotel. The trash enclosure takes its inspiration from the elements and features on the hotel. Because of Fire Code restrictions, trees are not • permitted immediately adjacent to the east elevation. Berming has been utilized along the D-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES . October 22, 2008 Page 3 Haven Avenue and 6th Street frontages. The pool area incorporates the use of decorative pavement, fire pit, water feature and 2 seating areas. D. Land Use Compatibility: Haven Avenue is the City's primary gateway corridor to and from the surrounding region, as well as the City's primary arterial for automobile and aviation connection points to interstate travel systems. Because of its location near the geographic center and its function as a major north-south corridor with access opportunities to the I-10 Freeway and Ontario Airport, the City has a rare opportunity to enhance its image and identity by encouraging high-quality office development and complimentary land uses typically found in urban environments. The project will promote land use goals of the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District by allowing for a hospitality use to be developed in close proximity to office, commercial and food uses that will maximize the economic position of the Haven Avenue corridor. Further, the proposed hotel meets the desired land use requirements and economic goals of the Haven Overlay District by offering transient occupancy to business travelers and visitors at a high visibility location on the City's primary north-south arterial. As discussed above, the hotel incorporates several architectural features that meet the urban and sophisticated design requirements of the Haven Overlay District. All of the adjacent land uses are compatible with the proposed hotel. • E. Noise. Odor and Vibration: The proposed hotel will not create any noise, odor or vibration that will negatively impact adjacent land uses. F. Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment will be screened by the parapet. G. Grading Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Grading Committee on September 16, 2008. The Committee recommended approval. H. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed on September 16, 2008, by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart and Nicholson). At the meeting, the applicant presented revised plans which satisfied the major and secondary issues to the satisfaction of the Committee. With the revisions presented by the applicant, the Committee recommended approval and that the project be forwarded on to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee's comments and the revisions presented by the applicant are included as conditions of approval in the attached Resolution of Approval. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on September 16, 2008, and recommended approval subject to the Standard Conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval. J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that • Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related D-3 to Cultural Resources, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Air Quality and Geology and PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 4 Soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. Staff required the applicant to post a large 4-foot by 8-foot Notice of Filing sign on the property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approved Development Review DRC2007-00542 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submQitted, /~ ~`~I ti~ Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:DG/ds Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Site Plan Exhibit D -Fire Access Plan Exhibit E -Grading Plan Exhibit F -Landscape Plan Exhibit G -Building Floor Plan Exhibit H -Building Elevations Exhibit I -Building Sections Exhibit J -Roof Plan Exhibit K -Trash Enclosure and Bus Shelter Elevations Exhibit L -Perspective Renderings Exhibit M -Design Review Action Comments dated September 16, 2008 Exhibit N -Initial Study Parts I and II Exhibit O -Air Quality Impact Analysis, dated June 20, 2008, prepared by Urban Crossroads -Distributed Under Separate Cover Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00542 • • • D-4 • • EXH uim3amwns - xna xouvznun 3iis ur lei i S Y `~~ pqpp _ v_ n t "€~ -~3a' ~ ~ 2 E y i s W 0 rWO xx n ~ ~~d¢~ ~ ua>~y a qqbwb ~ ~ ° ~ o u Yx v ~€e. ~ o ° o a~ GG S ¢n_' ~~ E 4 d yd g@¢ } E~d~~ V' ~e x ~N~. T3F~ 3g€ C; ~~7E3i<~ss 'y~~i i 1 _ ~ ~ '" ~~a~3 ~~"g 3~St ~~F..~kl ~g d CIg~ b ~ ~°N g e•AI§i ~IRq~y ~e~3ag [g a Febb2 5 `c a @ LY.~LC ~~~$E2a ~~A=~>,€ Ad S tr1€dv~ 6 ~~q~e I i a7g~ l ~~ ~~ , 3 l~~sa b~ a° 3 ~. ra 5gei ~ a 8 a, v+ s k _ gr N NZ O (xn pwmas irmznax (BI v3tlve05 dSgJ 350 03%IW boa r3er'rinzsnax0 ra~xna~ ~ :~ gF ~ ~ _.._.._.._.._.._ I °' :~ -. _._.-. O .. _.- _.-.-. _._.-.-.-.-_ e _ ':. 3a o ~ .~ • i ~ _.._.._.. ._.._. _.._.._.._.._.._.._.. _.._.._.. _.._.. _.._.._. O ~m m ~ _ _ - 1 j ~~ g>? is ~ Via? ~..%•~ i j ~ ~~ ~E p ° I ° O o~ o N ~>° i ;i j ! ma f i ° ~" o I ~j ! azO ad u H - o ~~v~z~° _ i I; I ~- a zo °~Z 3~°~a, ~ ~ '" i Iz'I ru~ ova ~ I ~° I 0 o I a ; d o0 o w = I-• j.-. ° ~ Z °~ ° ~ W I I .: _.._.._.._.._.._. a~O °o~°i o u! I ~ I I I I ° or~w ~`~ ! j III I ~ I ~. ~ F-- j o~~° 3 .._ i. T a N LL o ! .._.._ _.._.._.._.. ~ j ~ I. y l J oii I ~gl, i ~ °9aW Ili ~ 4~°y~si 3oQ I' j ~I I I ~, I ~,FS W _- °~, w ' ~~ !,J„i Fia ~ o ~ I I ° I S~ i a ~~ oio ~W ,. j jll ~ I i_4 au ~,. iv '_ ~ ) m O ..-.-.-.-.-._.-._.-._.-.-.-._ - ~IX)Ai N]AVH _.._.._.._.._..T.._.._.._.._.._. _, I .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ _ j ! i r y?~ i _ i l i as `a„~ j 3a. i I I _ _ I i I ~ ! j: ~ ~ a I I `! V = i I ! i I ! . . I _ I - j I V IBIT A l~-S ~.. 'w ~ EXHIBIT B s3uns oi3t~a3nnns - Nna Nourznun 3iis rq ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eRZ~ ~ ea~ _~ ~p ~ ~ CD ~Y H eggg ~ ~ K ~ i~ o Nti e ~ v y i~ ~B ~~~~ v ~a ~~ ~c u O~yfi~ N ~~" ~ ~ ~ h~ g ~: ~ o0 e ~~ b3~ ~ , ~ g vxop W gq8 AA~ yp~~4 y~y~~¢~¢y'$Y$ ~Q$jg}' }~ ~~L~r~r$~ a o Q o ~ gp ~ ~~~C^ ~i~f~~ tl:~s~3 di i ~~ht`~7Y~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ "~~ ~ - -- ~F 7Y - " ~6 • Yi Y Z ~~ rc V ~ Y64' ~ - .e c 8 aaaaa ~. ~oe_I_Y t N Hr ~ YI JO s` =555: 4: ..- ? as ~ E a~ ~ ~$~~e ~ ~a~~- g.5 I i j I Ij ~, Wn ~ ' li ~ ~ ~~ a ': 4 z I E 'a^z o ( ji j li III I - ^/oa I i I CV Wax i II I zo ' 3Wm ii 6 I'1,. e. °"m~ ~ ~ j; ,. :. 'E'li I ~jZ ` I, I ~ II I O zoo l~l, '. 1 ~4 ¢ I I. ~ I I; f ., 11 I ~~ ,,~~ ~~~~.~ o ~ -o I ~~ I I I ~L ~ ~ II~~~-+ -~5+ p ~ o~ p r I~ I I I I I~ II g^,' ~~ ilVl~"' rc II UU _~nj I Ij i III 1~6ei ~I I J ALL. aQ DU ~ I ~I I ' Ij aq~• '4, ~R~~i% o ,I k 3 S yl Va1 J ~ ~ j I j 'aY I Y i ~ ~ 1I _ { f.,'~ 0 o i I io~ II '~ ay i Ix' .~ pU ^'fUON~ fl Q _ .. 'v a~ _°~ow i 11,11 jI I~_ 'I:~~~:t~wte^ ~,..~ po~ °a~m6 ~ ~1, j ~ ~ III '. I, III I ;.°!x~~vp,. ~z*i ~~`~ `, _ N4o ~c-i~ ~oQma ~M1 I i~I; ~ ~. 40 ~ QU~~ ~li II ~i ~ `'ICI --~•'~ :., o I '. j I • i ' I Apr ~. U J= I b N II I 1 II 1 O~ U U ~ I I: j e Ali I 1I Q N~~O I ~I ~~ i ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~.~ ~Lql U I II vl NLLJ W~Q ~ I ~ 21i ~~ If LL F~ a I i x °I Y51j ~~- ~~il. ??o I I ! x . 0 Q i i.,l ji ~~'I t^~s_~'~ z~ II ~ i :~~ ! ~•i I i ~I.~I~~ W I I j I i ~ m0 I I .~ "~°: I w II `~~~ -n -; -- ~~q;,~~--_ ° ^~ F V JJ a~ $ : . yyYx I _ •. 8 _ 9' d~ .T.T Qaa ~ ~ Ek d _~ oYLSi ,aqS~~ "nj ~` L ~~ ER za ~~Eea i~C3~g~ ' e`x ~~ a aj _y a _" _~ $ ~ad~ ~aa~~a 4a ,^ ke`8 ~ yt y a:~ ~p~c'tlz E., a i ~ ~;; g ~ a "e~;se k ~~a ~ ~ AAA E;gi ~" n ~~'~- C o~S~S__ L~ y5e y~ ~t z y=: ~~~, 3; ~ Eoa s L gib AYY ~ qC~o S;~A ~r~ ~3'4 °~ „~~~±v r a c ~~k`aY ~ ~ xa ~~ ~ a' $ a°~'l~€ S ~a ~~ $ -It q ,I I - 11j11''(~II i %4 fl I'1~ li~'~i~ ~ `~- _: I I R _~~- - ~ S- f - ~ ~ j ~ I ~ 7 . hL . !.1~ I. I, ':f _ f _ ~ ~ ~~ ~ri, ~ q f= e3 'in~iu ~: '3 R'°- -~ , =~-- - _~ I „ „II :.'o:~,~ ~r fuze ~ ~ 'll 1 4 ~y j i'II A.; II I it I ~}~,! 11 .1 cull s•a~l l~ ~ i ~I •~ '.cr'+r~s ;i_. - _ .~._ I a ~ F'~ v^~-T f ~~ ,~T; - ~ ~ '~ II ~ ~ n ~ S^y'x~~lI ~ {r. rn,ti[.:1T_~tl'~~,~rF`7 f ,@ j~~~^c.l l ~I II~' I ~~•~':`j'`h:~~!}}.,l l'N~~ II ~..{ y( ~~t. ~~_~?I j~~".lj i i I- '1 III I I 11 ~\~MI"" ~i~f~'~~~24^i.4n~"5 M ~~Ik'~{~ J °P_` ~ __ k ~k .~ I I ~~ ~ ~, ;Lr,~.«u h s- d a-Yhs ~', a ~' f : ~~~ ~'. -nr _F~'I-1 -~ I - ~fIN3 V N VH - ~ _ b 0 2 W 4 ] Q>j4O1 4h~ ~o~ u W1~W p ¢ryW. U O paj = > W H 4 u 6 iaD ~:~ a°= n,l~ , 4 ~~P.~ Sale! $ d ~. °91` • • • XHIBIT D -~_ ~ _ 3~ _- --- n„~ -- -- -D=8 = °~- _- ----- • • • e ~ ~ 3g ,..3.e, .. aca ~~ 5 a $ ~ g z I ,~ ~ a a'~~aa"? p L~ -- 3151 Wa~ao~ ~^ R z .awl aa$~:,a=ss W~~gsz I~ ~ 111 :J ~9 - N~o c .°Y$m&._.de ~~°3°~t,.r s__.,IIII .I i ~~ o..'',~ axe ~5^ °I N. .3~.x Ytst39 i£a Ieag$`aa3„ ge~~o .•~~ z4 . ~~y@~ Yy rY`:~:: ~Y`Sa dY~Y` ~ T a a3ode $a 3a.Sax~ Wa;a= ,$~ea sa i yx ~1~.~ Y N--e"'TK~--'~- ~ Y~ ~ 'R~pS~s, i4 ~~r, t ,g J ~'"aa e'.e a'~ 7 axe W C ~3:~ °< ~~ e ,r°,I~'. a"a $~3§R~ ~e, ~ ~a 2x ~ ~Jf ~k rea ~_yY s_ '~p,~„ a.axa y.e z` a 3 $~$cc WIa8~oi3 °~R3E} d'~~: ~a'`,7a ~< 4 : 3~ .' I~'~li i' ~~,I - ~ . I l I~I ~ ~ ~ ~' I I in I~, ~ - ~4eae .. _ !£ I I '~~i ~i I. I it ~ `_i. O g, s: I I ,' i ~: ~:w ~ ~ ~ ~ -` r rz aar .. I _ "- ~ ~a I i ~~~, ~~~~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l Z ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ i o sQ it ..~!;'i s~'1-r+T''., ~~~~ Es= Se: n h a ~ i ~^v~i` u ZN~ 0 0~ 0 ~ ~ o I U p W e a Rh2. p tiU~ p 4p~ U h Y w 2 L 3 _ ~ ~ `ei Y3 SP Y ~ : . ~ ~ g '~ , ~ J r PPPY i~ze 6'= °e~a~'Sage ~~ d c ~ySY:id=~ a ~ q2 ~' d~a;'~"'e' ~ 3$3` 2 ei5o 6 a - 6 e py, i 4 g ~ ... i c S - c Tl s;: l ~ q " .; a gy~Ta " ~ ° ~e'a€~ g- s p a - ~ ~" " h ~ ~ '.a, o a., i ~ ~"~ .,,':o as '~ a -}y 2 ~ ~ AA J o C~ ~~ _ r. ~ I ~ ~_ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ _ ~: ~ t w _ I Ai I ~~ 'III ~ F _ ~i~ rv .'.P U tWn- ~~ ~~ K ' '~ ill n ~s~/i ~ rly_.:. 1.a q .~ . !: I. ~ { ~~ ~ ,~~I ~ ~. ~" ~~~ ~ ~ AIL., II ~ s: ,~ Ial I, A~-_ ~ ~- ~ Zvi i ;~l" ~ ~i i I III ~i ~~ -: '"r's 3e ~ illlll~ f. ~li~~~' ~t ~¢3 .`.e~' ~~~~y . 11 o. ui a. ~ iI I _ yd ~ Fs i m ~~i .a,e'1~~~'lil~..r ~ v ~. sp ~ 16" 3° _ ~~'r.` ~'f I I~ ~i I ' I~' ~ ~ 5 ~ - i ~ zo~ N ,~~. :ri... ,~,.n Iii ~L yl ~ -~ a z_ o r ~ a Z'a ~Y~~ ~ J ~~'~~1' ~~ qyo ~ g ~ g g y -s ~ ~ ¥ ~~L.I_ 'yi ~~ 4'i. I'i' ~~~I all ,~~, Ida ~_.f yi II - 1-fir ~ ' ~~':a ~ ~ ~x " . ... .r ~dl ~ I'. I Ini _. ~ "Ei1 L`.~.~ e~ i_ g p ~ _ __ :XHIBIT E e 9nv C,~y g €g°s> F s .~ ~, G " e gr o I a m a,R. it m~: L~^_ o.. v$Y ~4Y I1 4. n5Y''~ aw ~ _~ -, i n~ra~ _ ~ _ ~1rx~> _ __ _ _ _ >~ ;. 4 I ` m ~ n :s:.. ~ _ _ envs- _ 1 °~ m ~ _ _ ~rvrwvxn ~vw~ _ ~ ..~ I !, ____ , _r'•_ 3f1N3Atl_ _N3AtlF~~--I - __ - .3~_-_. _~. __ _ .....~....~~.__ _ _ ~' - _- 'T_ ~ ~ _~_ - ~_9'n- -rs~~_~___-_ _ & _ _ _ - -~~ ~ i . ~~ ~ . ~` ` . ~~ ~-~-F =~ ~~-i- - - -- - t- .:,e, ~ '~' V' ~ I ~-- ~~ ~ I lid ~~, -" j ~' ~i~~ I I ~~ ,,% ~I ,:~-, ~ ~ ~ ~f ~I I I,r_-- ~ ~ ~ III -h 1~ ~--°,-, _ ~ ~ r ~ I ~ ~~ - ~_ ~7~- ~ E - , ~~,-~.° o ~~ ; I , I I ~ g~j~ s Imo'-~ I ~ I; ~ ~, i ~ I I, 1~ I., ~ ~ ,. i ~~ ',, ~~ , ~ I ~~ ~ 1 g ~~ ~ ---,I ~ ~ ~ ~ - -,--_ 1I ! } ,~ 71 [ s.. ;., %" ti, ,`%, /a ~ ~ '. :~ ~~ ~ F> ~~ ~ ~.I~:-.1~~~ _ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ , ~` ~ ~- --~ _- - ~ - --- ~, ,. - - D-10 ~ -- '~I o~ - w~ J,. J • • 6 w a s _____ ---~ I ~ :...._ EXHIBIT F D~11 B s ~ R ~ e u oUOUJUU UaUUOU R o0 000 i :sysRR9x~a~s~. ~3~33a3ee3333 Cd°dddddddddd ~ ~ &~ ~ ~ w ~~~~~°~~~~?~~ ~d~ ~~ ~~:~ d~ ~.~ ~~ dSi;~~a~~°~o B z ~ ~< ~V 3 m° ~~ ~Nm (~~aC~4 ~~j °d"~~ m~ ~ ~ °° ~Z z 4 ~~ ~ n ~ ~ - ~ g~4 ~ °~m~ B ~ :~ k~~ ~ ~~~ g ~ ~ ~ w &~~ ~ ~ a s~~~ ~ ~6 ~ _- ~ ~ ~ ~y= ~ s ° fi ~w~~ ~ $~ z Cn ~~ r ~J G Z Y D Z J d W Q° U^ Q z 0 LL Q U :rgx ~ Q J J Q ~ ~ 88RS R ~ J a ~ _W ~ Q aO a Q ~ p y. y y~ 4~n s oy 4 K S v~ U !~y yK~ ~aG5 ~ ~ U ~ a ~ ~ Z a.~ o` o LLI ~ Z Y o C () ~~ d ~ i® ~ Q d ~~~ G ~ O N ~ r' ~ ' Ii ~ ~ '7 ~: '~ iS~ .d - ~ z //~/~ VJ Q ~.{ 4 7f n z. E ~~~ep ~g "11 ii ~~ ~ @5° _ TE~@p~ I u<~ °-9i .~ 4 , ~~ ~~~~~ 1 ~ ~~~~ ~w d~ ~~a~ a oe~g a D-12 a c E N U~ m t. C 8d W b` ~~ a4 v3 ~_ 4 G ~p e Q. C N d m C I W C W C O LL ;~ o J w o ~ U^e q 9 If R z. ~ @@~~5p& z~~4pz~ .g 11 ie ou~ 3G@i@ U~~~q~i ~' U<~ w98 -I ~~ c w .~,`~. o ~ ~; r`u! , W ;~ o Y . ~ U 0 ~i N _/i^ [ ~ ~~ Y'~ ~ a a a C (0 a~LL~ti H ~~ m Z d Q N4 Cy t LL " Um ~ Z W W .=- ~ ~.`*r W ~~~s J s 'rw Z !; `~ ,~,; W D_ ,~ Z W pp~~9~Qyy Z ¢m 5a W (/) ~a Wz LL J (n v 0 J ~ W Z ~ o U W ~ U c O G S Q ~ ¢ .? «~ r- (a ,(Jj • • • J u d Q$ ~ ~~' o Y 8 ~~ ~~ a~ "~ ~~ II Z~ ~ ggg~~§§§ 1 V„ 9 ~ 'll° ~~~ ~S~ W- I u"<~ 99~ .~ - ~~ - w 0 ~: Z Y O Z Q J d • ..d~~$ ~ ~~~~® ~,~~y ~~~~~ m H Z W 3 a~ J Z W J 0 • D-13 ~° 88 a~ C/) W H W CL W n~ PJ • Q_ N uWO p~* ~;, ~ ~a@ o Wo ~a ~u"<~ °9~ tt w U N J W H ~_ Z Y D s / 1 I• :XHIBIT G f______ ~~~____ D~14 Z Q J a O: O 9 Je ~~ Z 0 VJ W ~_ '~'^ VJ J W_ LL CW G a c~ z 0 U 7 U O x U <~ ca ~~ Q D~15 ~ U^ ~ Z~ ~ tl~~ 9 ~~~ b~ • o i @@~3 ~ ci: ~ 94~ o w U N J W H _~ Z Y D 2 I- a a'f 0 M Z N Zq • a O O J LL J Q U a r F- (~ a W Z F- o ,^ LL VJ Q U 0 J W ~ . z LL o U W~ c~ U • G O Q_ p~p~,~~ U~ LJ • • XHIBIT H z 0 w J W S H O z Q ~~W g. ° z ~ ~ a ` o=oh ~~~ a u<~ a~@ R W U N J W H Z Y D 2 q ~^ J ^ W W ~_ 0 J W_ LL W z 0 w J W F W ~~ CJ~ Q 4 °~! ~~~ a =~ ~H ~ u~ ~ 5g~ o tt w U h J W H Z Y O N Z Oq ~: w^ • fA W Z o H ~ (n U Z O Q w J w x 0 Z O Q W w a w W ~ 2 ~ O U W ~ U • c O G x ~~ ~~ ~~ Q • 3 1 8 3 3 P ~~ a ~ $ y S N u^9 q-' o zo<pp @~~ ~! CFH o w ~°~53 ~ U<~ 4~4~ O R W U J~ H Z Y O 9 • XHIBIT I D18 O ~i 0 lW 0 0- o 0 0 0 ® ® ® i ~ [~ [D lCl ®®f® Z: O-4_ U W" 0 N C VJ Q W¢ O ~ a U 0 J W ~ _ z LL ~ U W ~ U z ~ O o = w = U Q 'u 0 z ~p~~~ C CJ~ Q «uWp E 4~z °~j ,a • Si~~ qE ¢ ~< °~~ R W o U W H Z Z a Jq • ~~ VJ Q W Q `/~ 0 VJ Q U Q w ~ Z ~ O U W 7 U • O x EXHIBIT J c~ [t] D-19 ~' • I o ` I# -A: H !-~9 (/~F lllllly<y<~'YYYYYYII\/ Z 0 5 W c ~~~~ ~ s y z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W .o ~0 0 3o g 8 8 a p ~ c u 3 u W o d 'Y 9 v 6a a g~ ~ '" ~ ~E 3b U ~ sy ~59~ S' ~ ~ $ wi 3 G~ ~ 9 F~ 63 3 3 G G aooooo0 0 0 000 0 EXHIBIT K p F q}~ H l r~. ~ _~,. .~.-r~ ~, ,- ~:, L: ~ : ~ 'I;f' _ii-J O V"GV z '~ O 5 wb J t=/~ i33 ffrGQYY 5f Q rvUW h =. I +~` °~~~ ~'~ SW~ gga e u"<~ 99~ o tt w U N W H .~~~cn 'W z. Y D R w O ~ Z otS 2 w ~ x N ~ ~ m F- 3 W H 0 J W_ LL cW L ~ ~_/^~ Ja vJ m~ c~~l fV~ ~J i a z Q 0 a U c~ z 0 U 7 U O x U 2 Q j n • • EXHIB ili. i$.~• 1 ~+ U^~ `~Zr~ iG€ o zo ~~p~ ~~pp! o R W U N H Z Y D 3' . i W_ W F- U W a w a W H 0 J W LL W a z Q 0 a U ~~ ~~ Q c+ U~ <Z<' I a v"<~ 99H R W Q @4 0 • w l Z Y O .,,_ !;;„ •: D-22 `/ '. ^/ i ~i \\ 4 , 9 W a~ wa ~ J Q W ~ ~ Z_ lL 2 ~ ~Z F Q Z J O ~ ~ w ~~ • '3 L , .` s~`:- -' L~ ~~~ fA a W Z F- '/~ O U VJ a r~~ J W Z W o ~ a W ~ U O x U QZQ (/~ 2 k ll~d u~ • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p. m. Donald Granger September 16, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Design Parameters: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. The Haven Avenue Overlay District requires exemplary, sophisticated urban office architecture, and site planking should promote acampus-like environment utilizing plazas, courtyards, and other pedestrian amenities. Architecture that makes strong use of glass, rich materials (granite, travertine, etc ), metal, recesses, openings, and portals are highly sought after, and vertical and horizontal articulation in the wall planes is required. Wood framed structures and low, lineal buildings in the Haven Overlay District are discouraged. The use of stucco in the Haven Overlay District is strongly discouraged. The applicant is proposing a ,four-story, 122-room hotel, utilizing the following exterior materials: brushed metal (two shades), smooth stucco, grey ceramic tile, glass, and E.I.F.S. The design includes a Porte cochere with a metal canopy using interlocking zinc panels, outdoor fireplace, and trellis feature at the west elevation; decorative concrete at both entry points; and an outdoor plaza at the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The hotel design showcases a tower element at the northwest building corner, utilizing brushed metal, glass, and an angled roof element that provides a focal point. All pedestrian crosswalks are designed with decorative concrete. An attractive bus shelter that incorporates design elements of the hotel also will be included on 6th Street. The trash enclosure takes its inspiration from the elements and features of the hotel. Because of Fire Code restrictions, trees are not permitted immediately adjacent to the east elevation. Berming has been utilized along the Haven Avenue and 6th Street frontages. The pool area incorporates the use of decorative pavement, fire pit, water feature, and two seating areas. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Overall, staff compliments the architectural design of the hotel. Since Haven Avenue is a gateway corridor, staff recommends the following enhancements be made in order to fulfill the requirement of two primary building materials and exemplary architecture: • At the west elevation, on the ground floor wall plane, fireplace, HVAC screen wall, 8-foot by 16-foot block columns and low split-face wall at the trellis feature, utilize gray raramir. Lila vanaar rmaterial note 5) instead of E.I.F S and split-face block, respectively. EXHIBIT M D-23 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 16, 2008 Page 2 • At the west elevation, the trellis feature proposes the use of 2 feet by 8 feet, 2 feet by 6 feet, and 2 feet by 4 feet lumber. Staff recommends using larger sized lumber with decorative edges in order to create a greater architectural presence and better withstand the effects of weathering. As noted above, both sophisticated architecture and exemplary site planning is required in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Because of Haven Avenue being designated as a Special Boulevard and the high visibility of the corner, the plaza should be enhanced with some of the following site features: placement of art or water feature, lighted bollards or use of ground uplighting, and terraced landscaped planters. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Utilize colored concrete at all handicapped parking stalls. 2. The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways should be extending deeper into the project site, terminating at a logical point, such as the crosswalk. 3. In order to maintain the integrity of the view from Haven Avenue and preserve initial visual impressions of the protect, the trash enclosure near the Haven Avenue driveway should be shifted td a less prominent location such as the southeast area of the site. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the project in light of the comments outlined above and provide additional input and direction. Staff recommends that with the issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, the project be recommended for approval and forwarded on to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner Donald Granger At the meeting, the applicant presented revised plans which satisfied the Major and Secondary Issues to the satisfaction of the Committee. Specifically, the applicant presented revised plans which included the following changes: • At the west elevation, on the ground floor wall plane, fireplace, HVAC screen wall, 8-foot by 16-foot block columns, and low wall at the trellis feature, gray honed block will utilized. D-24 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 16, 2008 Page 3 • At the west elevation, the trellis feature will utilize metal members. • The plaza will feature a seat wall with lighting, lighted bollards, and flag poles. • Colored concrete will be utilized at all handicapped parking stalls. • The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways shall be designed per the Landscape Plan presented at the meeting. With the revisions presented by the applicant, the Committee recommended approval and that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. • • D-25 . T.H "r" ~"~~~~ ENVIRONMENTAL ~;~ - a , - ~, - r. ,~ • -~'. INFORMATION FORM is~,. ~~' (Part I -Initial Steady) City o/Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the fab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Orvisron ' (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components ofthe-proposed project so that the City may'review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances', and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CE(1A. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the lime of submittal;.City staff wdl not be available to perform work regwred to provide missing information. Application Number for the pro/ect to which this lorm pertains: Pralecr Title' Summerfield Suites • .Name & Address of project owner(s) DKN Hotels, 540 Golden Grcle Dnve, Suite 214, Santa Ana, CA 92705 `_ Name & Address of developerorproject sponsor Same as above Contact Person & Address: Gene Fong Associates, Atin: Randy Itaya 1107 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Name & Address of person preoanng this form (i(different from above) EX H I B IT N Page i of i 1 Created on 5/8/2007 6.06.00 PM D-26 I PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: '7) Provide a full scale (8-7/2 x 17) copy o(the USES Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the proect site, and indicate the sde boundaries. Z) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west views into and from the sde from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe): Haven Avenue & 6th Street (Southeast corner) 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary). 0210-081-13-0000 `s) `6) Net Site Area (total sde size minus,area o(public streets & proposed dedications) 3 OS Acres f 133,027 Sq Ft. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amehdment or zone change which would affect the protect site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the protect: Building & Safety Permit, Mechanical Permit. Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Grading Permit. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as d exists before the protect including information on topography, sod stabddy, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condrt~on) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cde all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeologroal surveys, traffic studies). There are no existing structures on the site. The site is bare and vacant except for 3 mature trees located at the far W esf end nearby the existing sidewalk. The site's topography is relatively flat Directly adjacent South of the site is another bare and vacant lot with no exisfin structures or trees. u • Environmenlalin(oForrn_GFv.doc Page 2 of 11 Created on 6I8/?007 6.06 00 PM D~27 Information indicated by an astedsk (J is not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staf,`. 10) Descnbe the known cultural and/or hrstoncal aspects of the site. Cite atl sources of information (books, published reports and oral history}' There are no known cultural or historical aspects of the site. The site is currently a bare and vacant lot with an adjacent vacant lot to the South • llJ Describe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc J and how they will affect proposed uses: Medium traffic noise from Haven Avenue. Low to medium traffic noise from 6'" Street. Low traffic noise from the 10 Freeway which is approximately 1 mile South of site Occasional various levels of aircraft noise from the Ontario Airport which is approximately 2 miles Southwest of the site. 12J Descnbe the proposed project in detail Thrs should provide an adequate descnptron of the site rn terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed prolest. Indicate rf there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur wdh each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) rf necessary. Proposed 5-story 118 room Hotel Swte and a 2-story Office Building. Hotel to include a Porte Cochere, outdoor swimming pool and garden area. Office Building to have standard weekday office hours and closed weekends. Site to include shared surface parking for both buildings. Site to be landscaped per City requirements. One proposed driveway entrance off of Haven Avenue Two proposed driveway entrances off of 6th Street. w EnvuonmentallnfoForm_GFP..doc Page 3 of 11 Creates on 5/8/2007 6:06.00 PM D ~28 13J Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores. etc J and scale of development (height, frontage, setback. rear yard, etc.) The adjacent properties to the North, East, and West are 2 to 3-story commercial office buildings with surface parking and surrounded with landscape. The adjacent property to the South Is an empty lot with no landscape or asphalt. The adjacent property South of this empty lot is another 2 to 3-story commercial office building with surface parking and surrounded with landscape. There is contruction currently in progress on the Northwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6`" Street. -- • 14) Wdl the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character oRhe surrounding general area of the project? The pattern, scale or character of the existing surrounding general area Is generally contemporary commercial ranging from 1 to 5-stories so the proposed 5-story Hotel and the 2-story Office Building well be in accord with the existing surrounding general area. 75) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adJacent properties and on-site uses What methods ofsoundproofing are proposed? Short term noise to be expected during construction of project from vehicles and construction workers. Contractor to provide some means of temporary sound barrier during construction. 'l o") Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees' There are 3 existing mature trees located at the far West end of the site which may or may not be removed and/or replaced with new trees depending on City requirements and the Conceptual Landscape Plans. EnmronmentallnioForm_GFA doc Page 4 of 7 I Created on 5/82W / 6 06:00 PM D ~29 w 77) Indicate any bodies of water (mcludmg domestic water supplies) into which the sde Brans. None. 18J Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage esLmates) For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2597. a. Residential (gal/dayJ Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) 3000.00 Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 79) Indicate proposed method o(sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ~ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attac/1 percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generabon.~ (See Attachment A (or usage eshmatesJ. For further clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2597. a. Residential (gal/dayJ b. Commeraal/lndustnal (gal/day/ac) 2.000 00 .RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20J Number of residential units Detached (indicate range of parcel s¢es, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: c Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units). 27) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(sJ $ to $ Rent (permonfh) $ to $ 22) Speafy number of bedrooms by unit type. ' • cnmrcnmen;allnfoFOnn _GFA.doc Page 5 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6 06 00 PM D30 23) /ndicate anticipated household size by unit type: • • EnmronmentallnfoForm_GFA doc Page 6 0( 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6 O6 00 PM D31 24J Indreate the expected number of school children who will be residing wdhm the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachmenf 8. • a. Elementary b Junior High: c. Senior High - COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commeraa/, mdustnal or institutional uses Hotel rooms are either studios or one-bedroom suites with kitchenette. Dining and lounge facilities provided for complimentary meal service. Meeting rooms provided for conference or for complimentary meal service Meeting rooms provided for conference or banquet functions. Office building provides multi- tenant spaces for standard office (non-medical) uses. 26) Total floor area of commeraal, industrial, or rnsGtutional uses by type: Hotel = 84,752 Sq. Ft. Office = 22,333 Sq. Ft. 27) Indicate hours of operation: • 24 hours for Hotel. Standard business hours for Office building (9 OOam - S:OOnm). _ ___ 28J Number of emp/oyees~ Total 16 Maxmum Shrff Time of Maxrmum Shrtt. 8 am - 4 29J Provide breakdown o(antiapatedlob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): Room Attendant ($8 - $12); Building Engineer ($12 - $16); Front Desk ($10 - $15); Sales ($40,000/yr.); General Manager ($60,000 - $85,000/yr ) 30) EstrmaGOn of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. All '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o(arr pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Ouabty Management District, at (878) 572-6283). • Construction vehicle emissions during construction. Standard vehicle emissions from employees and guests during normal operations after completed contruction. Environmen;allnioForm_GFA doc PaSe 7 of t t Created on 5182007 6 O6 00 PM D-32 cnvironmenlallnioForm_GFA doc Page R n( 11 Created on 5/82007 6 06.00 PM D-33 ALL PROJECTS • 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and !food control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed protect ~ If so, please indicate rhea response No contact 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or towc materials include, but are not Irmrted to PCB's, radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, so/vents. and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. According to the office of planning and research, state of California, this sde Is not located wdhin an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site. (T.B.D ) • 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or towc materials, including but not Innrted to those examples listen' above%' ./yes, provide an inventory of aft such r,iatenals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans N/A 1 hereby certify that the statements funushed above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and information required (or adequate evaluation of this protect to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that adddional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Gty of Rancho Cucamonga Date: 7/D ~~ Signature: ~ ~~_ ~~lE ~ Elz(L4~Z_ Title: (/1LE ~SfD~.lT ~ ~!&/IdE~'r{r{E- r 1 LJ EnvvonmentallnfoForm_GFA.doc Page 9 of 11 Created on 6l8/2007 6:06 00 PM D-34 of ~~ d ~ ~~~~ ~ avoo~_ o _- B. N 'ur o---}O H3 kY d _ _ - _ -H+k+l-3-FH '_ _ 0 c ~ _ - r /`~~/ d ~e6O^ ss LJ ~a ~ o v I ` s's e _ d `~~ o rx'px ~' ~Q-v _ _ o'I n d _mo `o O m0 _ _ v l dO ^ vYi ~. N C p9 ~~ ~<61r1 ~ ^ t6~itl ~ o u e+. -'p NO m lr m i Ili QOQ ~~ y- e 1 ~ Om ^! v~ O O ~ O QmN ~~ ~xo O ' = =d . ~r. 9°I I I es (°n I M_ a _ ~ I v ~~, I I _ y V ~ a rn ~ . r \~ ~ px'Itr lye ~, lf7 r (° sstl N - . O ~ I C° sr I o 9° it Y li .a a~ ~] Lf7 I _ _ ~ ~ I Q;n~ a i _ - _M I '° e _ 'I \_ to ' n sm c° • ~ IY' -1r,lx -• r5 pr9 Bp girl r !( r66 {55 IfSI q[ 4(p O ~ m 9° sr t. nt ~ ` r _ ~ ~ 64 i~ o~m r p9 I1• 1 ~ N I m oO a por ~~ pl{~= I e p 0 I _ `~~ _ dO ~ ~ o a U ~ -- J for i `n'v¢ 1¢I 1¢ atl rr ps Iw 6 ~. ¢or` er I~ o_ o_ o ~~ \o~ / ~ ss ps xxp sr N^ xt sely 1 ~xx _, `\"~~\-o` ~I ~, - it sltl ~~~WN c m I _ i ~ B _ ~' Dory d~ N, \\ I ry - - o - ~'/~tin y _ a° ~~ a~~ o H~w;;HEf+H+rar~ 0~_ - - ~~rr ep ppx >'< pl <~ ¢-~ ~e d _ \ ~ LA rt y n r ~v '-~-0Nd kY~O~~a° a° -xo ss~~ _=I= s<r~ epr ~ I~ sl~ps. °_ _ a c a a o. a a _ rp,39 _ r ... ~Ne ~m ~ ~. a o - L?~i' a d ddaada ry • n u D35 • ~~ ~~W ~=~tl Nzo~ ~@a! ~ u"<~ X90 tt w U W F- r = Z Y D _~ a 2 F etf K M z N Z4 a O O LL J Q U a r W H O J W_ LL. CW L a c~ z U U O U 2 6~` ~4t:i S~E~ v XHIBIT z O 1 W J W S H O z ° z: { ~~~ y y o ~ o Vg!g ~ • oo i °§~ h W U H _ ' Z Y O 2 OQ H~ J ^ '^ • W Wz F- o LL (n v J W ~ _ z LL ~ U W~ z 0 Q W J W N W C~ U . L Q Q2 (~ 2 "> ~~ Q ~,,. e =~ p :~' o=~~ ~~ ~ u"<~ "9~ a w U W F Z Y D • • z O w J W F O z O w W F Q w N Z Oq ~' w W F- J W LL W ln/~i~~rl~yq USJ EXHIBIT i z of w O A 1 6 9 d A b e ~ ~~ a ", a v V~ ~ U<Y A~6 K W U J O Y. 4 N Z: O4 U~ W" N z 0 w C ~a WZ I- O . LL (/~ U J W ~ _ z O ~~ W ~ U z C O q L = W ZQU N ~ S a 0 z (~ C ~~ • • • lu • • EXHIBIT J Q u`I 4, ,°~z< a~ oi~~ ~~@ ~u<~ 94~ u w U N Z Y O Z Q Jq OS W ~_ 0 J W LL W ^~z n~, ~ ..:= . ,:a~ y; ~:,tr o ` ~ii; ~, ~~ '~ ®~ ':::~Ji~ ;''~~ . I 'I I' ,i it I! ~ ! ~rn ~ rrn F L W Fp ~* z 0 0 5 ~~~_ ~~~ ~ ~ ~_a~_ ~qqwo@o o ;off d ~ u S ~ ~ ~ u F ~ ~ k ~ , y ~ ~~ } .S' S.' i ~ ~ e z o ~' ; ~ $ x ~ u~ 0000000 0 0 000 0 EXHIBIT K a b~ ~~ ~I a S J e~ w 4 d ~~ K W4 ~_ ~~ m Q ~~W ° z<~ dl 4 ~~ ~ ~ga W°s 4 W ~0"<5 @9. a w U 2 Y D . w ~ ~ o W Zeax w N a m (~ a W Q ~ o U ~~ J W ~ _ z LL ~ U W~ U '^~ Q_ VJ CSC ~~ • • • • • EXHIB Q [v UW Q Z(~ tl o °~ ~ ~~~ ~ uo ~ °9~ a w U H Z O y W_ 1 W F- U W a w a W H J W LL W ~~ ~~ Q NUW o Zr y~ ~m 4 ~-! ~Sg • °o Wo ~d¢ ~ u"<~ ygl a w U N J O Y ~ . W Q U W J Q W ~ ~ Z LL • Z ~ ~ Z Fa Z y O~ ~~ LL W H W ~_ J W LL W ~~ ~~ • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7'20 p.m. Donald Granger September 16, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Design Parameters: The 2 97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. The Haven Avenue Overlay District requires exemplary, sophisticated urban office architecture, and site planning should promote acampus-like environment utilizing plazas, courtyards, and other pedestrian amenities. Architecture that makes strong use of glass, rich materials (granite, travertine, etc.), metal, recesses, openings, and portals are highly sought after, and vertical and horizontal articulation in the wall • planes is required. Wood framed structures and low, lineal buildings in the Haven Overlay District are discouraged. The use of stucco in the Haven Overlay District is strongly discouraged. The applicant is proposing a ,four-story, 122-room hotel, utilizing the following exterior materials: brushed metal (two shades), smooth stucco, grey ceramic tile, glass, and E.I.F.S. The design includes a Porte cochere with a metal canopy using interlocking zinc panels, outdoor fireplace, and trellis feature at the west elevation; decorative concrete at both entry points; and an outdoor plaza at the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The hotel design showcases a tower element at the northwest building corner, utilizing brushed metal, glass, and an angled roof element that provides a focal point. All pedestrian crosswalks are designed with decorative concrete. An attractive bus shelter that incorporates design elements of the hotel also will be included on 6th Street. The trash enclosure takes its inspiration from the elements and features of the hotel. Because of Fire Code restrictions, trees are not permitted immediately adjacent to the east elevation. Berming has been utilized along the Haven Avenue and 6th Street frontages. The pool area incorporates the use of decorative pavement, fire pit, water feature, and two seating areas. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Overall, staff compliments the architectural design of the hotel. Since Haven Avenue is a gateway corridor, staff recommends the following enhancements be made in order to fulfill the requirement of two primary building materials and exemplary architecture: • At the west elevation, on the ground floor wall plane, fireplace, HVAC screen wall, 8-foot by 16-foot block columns and low split-face wall at the trellis feature, utilize gray raramir tiles vanaar rmaterial note 5) instead of E.I.F.S and split-face block, respectively. EXHIBIT M DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 16, 2008 Page 2 At the west elevation, the trellis feature proposes the use of 2 feet by 8 feet, 2 feet by 6 feet, and 2 feet by 4 feet lumber. Staff recommends using larger sized lumber with decorative edges in order to create a greater architectural presence and better withstand the effects of weathering. 2. As noted above, both sophisticated architecture and exemplary site planning is required in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Because of Haven Avenue being designated as a Special Boulevard and the high visibility of the corner, the plaza should be enhanced with some of the following site features: placement of art or water feature, lighted bollards or use of ground upliohtino. and terraced landscaped planters. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Utilize colored concrete at all handicapped parking stalls. 2. The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways should be extending deeper into the project site, terminating at a logical point, such as the crosswalk. In order to maintain the integrity of the view from Haven Avenue and preserve initial visual impressions of the project, the trash enclosure near the Haven Avenue driveway should be shifted to a less prominent location such as the southeast area of the site. Policy Issues: The following items area matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the project in light of the comments outlined above and provide additional input and direction. Staff recommends that with the issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, the project be recommended for approval and forwarded on to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Donald Granger At the meeting, the applicant presented revised plans which satisfied the Major and Secondary Issues to the satisfaction of the Committee. Specifically, the applicant presented revised plans which included the following changes: • • • At the west elevation, on the ground floor wall plane, fireplace, HVAC screen wall, 8-foot by 16-foot block columns, and low wall at the trellis feature, gray honed block will utilized. DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES September 16, 2008 • Page 3 • At the west elevation, the trellis feature will utilize metal members. • The plaza will feature a seat wall with lighting, lighted bollards, and flag poles. • Colored concrete will be utilized at all handicapped parking stalls. • The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways shall be designed per the Landscape Plan presented at the meeting. With the revisions presented by the applicant, the Committee recommended approval and that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. • _:~~ . ;$=~_~~~~-~ ENVIRONMENTAL ~~~` - `~ INFORMATION FORM ,. t ~~r ~`-{`~'~{"~~~~''~~i (Part I -Initial Study) City o/Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clear/y using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) Planning Drvis~on (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed' project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City. Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act;, and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA.. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in.full. ". INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that et is the responsebdity of the applicant to ensure that the application es complete at the time ofsubmittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide messing information. Application Number for the project to which thes form pertains: Project Title Summerfield Suites • Name 8 Address ofpro/ect owner(sJ~ DKN Hotels, 540 Golden Circle Drive, Sude 214, Santa Ana, CA 92705 Name 8 Address of developer orproject sponsor.' Same as above Contact Person & Address: Gene Fong Associates, Attn. Randy Itaya 1107 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above). • EXH I BIT N Page t of t t Created on 5/8/2007 6'06 00 PM I. ___-_ t .. , PROJECT INFORMATION &' DESCRIPTION: '1) Provide a full scale (8-7/2 x 17) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west: views into and from the site from the pdmary access points that serve the site; and representative views of srgnrfcant features from the site. Include a map showing /oca6on of each photograph. 3) Protect Location (describe): Haven Avenue & 6th Street (Southeast corner) 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet i(necessary). 0210-081-13-0000 Net Site Area (total site s¢e minus.area o(pub6c streets & proposed dedications). 3.05 Acres / 133,027 Sq.Ft. '5) "6) 7) Describe any proposed general plan amehdment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet rf necessary): N/A 8) Include a descdption of all permits whrch writ be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the pro/ect: Building 8 Safety Permit, Mechanical Permit, Electrical Permit, Plumbing Permit, Grading Permit. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the protect including information on topography, soil stability, plants and anima/s, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (~.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies).' There are no existing structures on the site. The site is bare and vacant except for 3 mature trees located at the far West end nearby the existing sidewalk. The site's topography is relatively flat. Directly adjacent South of the site is another bare and vacant lot with no existing structures or trees. • • EnvironmentallnfoFOrm_GFA.doc Page 2 of i 1 Created on 5/8/2007 6:0600 PM Information rndreated by an asterisk (') is not requrred ofnon-construction CUP's unless othervvise requested by staff lOJ Descrbe the known cultural and/or h~stoncal aspects of the sde. Cite all sources of mformabon (books, published reports and oral historyJ. There are no known cultural or historical aspects of the site. The site is currently a bare and vacant lot with an adjacent vacant lot to the South • 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc J and how they will affect proposed uses: Medium traffic noise from Haven Avenue. Low to medium traffic noise from 6'" Street. Low traffic noise from the 10 Freeway which is approximately 1 mile South of site Occasional various levels of aircraft noise from the Ontario Airport which is approximately 2 miles Southwest of the site. 72) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate descnption of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed pro7ecf. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary' Proposed 5-story 118 room Hotel Suite and a 2-story Office Building. Hotel to include a Porte Cochere, outdoor swimming pool and garden area. Office Building to have standard weekday office hours and closed weekends. Site to include shared surface parking for both buildings. Site to be landscaped per City requirements One proposed driveway entrance off of Haven Avenue. Two proposed driveway entrances off of 6th Street. • EnvironmentallnfoFOrm_GFA doc Paye 3 of 11 Created on Sl8l2007 6.0600 PM 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties. rncludtng information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity ofland use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and sca/e of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): The adjacent properties to the North, East, and West are 2 to 3-story commercial office buildings with surface parking and surrounded with landscape. The adjacent property to the South is an empty lof with no landscape or asphalt. The adjacent property South of this empty lot is another 2 to 3-story commercial office building with surface parking and surrounded with landscape There is contruction currently in progress on the Northwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6`h Street. • 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The pattern, scale or character of the existing surrounding general area is generally contemporary commercial ranging from 1 to 5-stories so the proposed 5-story Hotel and the 2-story Office Building will be in accord with the existing surrounding general area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including~source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term noise to be expected during construction of project from vehicles and construction workers. Contractor to provide some means of temporary sound barrier during construction. '76) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are 3 existing mature trees located at the far West end of the site which may or may not be removed and/or replaced with new trees depending on City requirements and the Conceptual Landscape Plans. • EnvironmentallnfoForm_GFA.doc Page 4 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6 06 00 PM i7) Indreate any bodies of water (rncludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams: None. 18) Indreate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estmates). For fu Rher clanfication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Resrdenhal (gal/day) Peak use (gal/DayJ b Commercial/Ind (gal/day/ac) 3000.00 Peak use (gal/mm/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ~ ®Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system rs proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation. (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clanfication. please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distrct at 987-2591 a. Residential (gal/day) b. Commercrel/Industnal (gal/day/ac) 2.000.00 • RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential unds Detached (indicate range of parcel saes, minimum lot sae and maximum lot sae: Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale unrts).~ 21) An6crpated range of sale paces and/or rents: Sale Pace(s) $ to $ • Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by and type. EnvironmentalinfoForm_GFA.doc Page 5 of 11 Created on 5/812007 6 06 00 PM 23) Indicate anticipated household s¢e by and type: I u EnvironmenfallnfoForm_GFA doc Page 6 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6.06:00 PM 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who wdl be residing within the project. Contact the appropriate • School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary b Junior Hrgh. c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercal, industrial orinsbtubonal uses Hotel rooms are either studios or one-bedroom suites with kitchenette. Dining and lounge facilities provided for complimentary meal service. Meeting rooms provided for conference or for complimentary meal service. Meeting rooms provided for conference or banquet functions. Office building provides multi- tenant spaces for standard office (non-medical) uses. 26J Total floor area of commercial, mdustrial, or institutional uses by type Hotel = 84,752 Sq. Ft. Office = 22,333 Sq. Ft. 27) Indicate hours of operation • 24 hours for Hotel Standard business hours for Office building (g:00am - 5:OOnm). `_ 28J Number ofemployees Total: 16 Maxrmum Shift: 8 Time of Maxrmum Shit: 8 am - 4 29) Provide breakdown of anticipatedfob classifications, including wage and sa/ary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classrficaGOn (attach additional sheet if necessary): Room Attendant ($8 - $12), Building Engineer ($12 - $16); Front Desk ($10 - $15); Sales ($40,000/yr.); General Manager ($60,000 - $85,000fyr.) 30J Estimation of the number ofworkers to be hired that currently reside in the City: All `31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source. type and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract, at (818J 572-6283). • Construction vehicle emissions during construction. Standard vehic_ le emissions from employees and euests during normal operations after completed contruction. cnvuonmentallnfoForm_GFA doc Page 7 of 11 Created on 5/812007 6:06 00 PM cnvuonrnenialinfororm_GFA.doc Page 8 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6 06 00 PM ALL PROJECTS • 32J Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed projects /f so, please indicate their response. No contact • 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals? Examples ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactroe substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the matenals and descnbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. According to the office of planning and research, state of California, this site is not located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site. (T.B.D ) 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. including but not linvted to those examples listed above %' it yes, provide an inventory of ate sucfi matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans N/A I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation ofthis project to the best o(my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City o(Rancho Cucamonga. • Date: 7/D U7 EnvironmentallntoForm GFA.doc Signature: j~ ~~-~_ (~lE ~(/EIL/LQZo~ Title: (r/CE ~lDF7.1T (~ ~/NEErrr{/JEt- Page 9 of 11 Created on 5/872007 6.06 00 PM ~ ffi a ~ ~ rs 00 - ~ ~~ or ~ e. eeee~~ o dr =-3il N3 kr d _ _ _ _,_ _ - N}N}t}yy ;_ _ rn ~ nLJ-E ~, fO _ oO<e ~OM1O I ~~ ^ " ~('~^n.. c o V+ P~ ~ ee~6e VSU i~ loo.[' ..~ o U v I \ ._-~e~~ fvoxn oe~~ - ~ ap.o o ~:J ~ U I ~. c ~ c[vx ~~~ rLi c '" ° " ..~ l09" r9n ~. xe6 p°._ v°iom G Q I ast . of ~[ ~ s. s e 9 w m ~ m ~O= = o- I' m o c „f I n o 0 c ° I QmN m~ I ~ a~~ ~xo O ~ a ~ ;~ . ~tf U.-~ oxx ~=: 1 901 1 I ee „ fox[ I M oOn ~~•O~j n~a N ~ 6~« I an r OO a 1 < ~y O I ~- O~ I . r` \[D ~ I ["~ 6t IxC y M [0 56i1 n I c~ m uO-~ ~ i «o is ~ .[ f[I ~ ~«- ~~ ~ ~° - ..M I eq ~~` ,I -a N ° C `" J .~ w o 9. i. nx a avOr I ~ 6 60 i d ~ ,~~, - _ - 0O~ ~ -- O i oOe ve d Q> O I 6~" o. _ 91t I _ e Z _ d `. 91 24L Z e° _ ~ ~ _ o-O ~ _ ?~ i - - da ~ i em °d U 09 ~ ` ~ ~ ~ •+9f S[i _ , (lt) (x['Cx() [C 9t I15 n n.60. 6C I[1 _~ +- O ~ cc a u9 c[ - ~ x[ c 9n - - 1 ~ o 0 0 - a ' a' ,t< V ~ ~ a.. ~ o oOM1 ~ ~}AK;-N 9}SNi-M- Oo ~'~n~ - ern[ ..~ c °' I s' 1 0 a-~ a- ° _ nog - ~ [~ ff ` a°e ~ _ _ _ _ 0 1 x9~.c I ~ _ _ 09 1~ ~^ ~ ~ -~ 11 4f - I a d ~ 2 0. a a I 6 LO 99fr •I se .r <9r 61 fs~ '-°-~nµ3kr- ~r---- ~-~-----=-N3kdN-~--I _ _ ~ l g9 ~ ~ r r ~~. O _ t'tl r 1 [ ~ ly ~ 7aO M Lea o. v a r r o • • 1 VIEW FROM NORTH OF 6TH STREET LOOKING SOUTH 4 VIEW FROM WEST OF ~~ AVE. LOOKING EAST 2 • VIEW FROM EAST LOOKING WEST 3 VIEW FROM SOUTH LOOKING NORTH l~ GUASTI, CALIF. SEµ ONTARIO 15' OUAORANOLE N3400-W11730/7.5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 2452 11 NE '4/ R~~~/.l000AMONGA PEAKI '49 R e~ 1966 ~ C ~__s /_.-..~~u/.\ , u Ir-.___-'_ ___"_._'__ ~ ~ PHOTOREVISED 1881 -,'x__,36 II IJSO o--„ Un II /JSU~ ~~ DMA 2452 II SE-SERIES VBBS r `-jj3 ' ` _ _ II-~ /' .c ' II -_ ! _.. ..`. ~U~$La 110!1. -Y __ --_// ~yl- `_ N "~ WBII II _. .p.._/ A "~ II ~~0 'II:~~ ~~-^-.Y~ I u ^- 1 1360 . I~ 1 A p I A II A I ~ II -\ /` I i_ - -~ ._ _.-~_/1~~ ~r2 (~__ . n --~~ -128011..` A A I A `_ - - ___ - .««.. sere.. '~\~r~a..e «.{F.~~e~~ s 11L.~a~~=-"° -KGB ' ~, - _ _ e I 'Q -Iii-~--~._~~ II II II ~~'._ II-_-' " `% II / - __J - zcccc_c z _ A /I50 II : = '~~~ ` ~ 3 =ScM1 ~" ~ JII\¢ = = °=__ 4 -l2J(1^t.~ y n ~ a,- 1 ~ I .. .... _.. i ~~ ~ . ..c ~ ~ Iller 1~~ ~ ~ o ~ -o .. 1 II y~y II .~, ~ ..i Izzo u .. ..... ...... r'JC• 1 . ..: L° r I 1 LANE i Y 142/3 II I •r • ~ S BM •••• •- 120H o ~.~~ fd n Cam"' II u ~. f911e! ~~ ~ 'r II I 11 ar '• II II X ~ A ~ S ~"_`-~` II 195 ~ .~ ~ II ~A ~ ' f~ QI q leo vcv e-ccccvnJ~h~=a=CCe6COa~ cc u Ino-~ti: _ ~ ~ ii i ii I TA ~\S rrA I ~ n `ono-" A ,C '. A ' ' --' ~-ll n - ZT n u e u . A y ~ ~ Cucamonga ScA `C ' ~ e-®__ ' //< , //50 .... ~ N _ - AT EKA _ __ __ - _ _ _ _ - _ ~ :_ ? ' i :.. ..;,i,. ~ '• _ ~ A v `~ sT Rochester ___..__ _ _.. __. .__ _/____ ~~ . 1®Reservoi ipa ~ _ ._, ~_..___.._ u n II _ \_ _ `_ ®~ ~VI IIII !~ 4 Well 1 n ~ ® /D6B • \ Well I\ /1 I - 4.. J~~-~.y0>0~1 ~~_'~.-~i-~lll~ ~~~IOBO_ A ceccz__~ z c~z ~t~:=z=cec c _x_'__57___ _ __ca 11 J~/ _ - .. ~ _ ~ o W l \ ` el ~7" .~T Aso oo= .' ' `-~' " _. ~ 1 II ~='i"'~~ -.I I \ ~~ _-._.-"''~' I-+j---~; /~. _ 'o ¢ O II \~--~ I II Q w e ~-r ~ ~ 1050 II ~" -- -\ Well ail I 5_ 9': ~~ ~ I _ _ -~® ~ ~~ .. HER~ ROINO /'.~ ~~ I % ~ WAVE ""-~~\ RANC \~ L'__'~ _,000AMONGA -- I ...... i \ • ___ II II -____ ` ~~. L _ /~' a sa I 1`U ~ p _ <:~ __.. F u ~ - r-n- / ~- Reserv 6~1 •' s` E+.i ~ ..::,= ~~'~,._ i _~ ` __ l 0 ~. 1 ; ms _ n -:..__ - Nm. F~ ,.. _-. -. .'„° VsiR141 Al l Y./A'i~.yCR["Cf11M1lAN tl~- II _ ~'S, ~.~... ~i .. BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: Development Review DRC2007-00542 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DKN Hotels, c/o Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park • 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 2.97-acre protect site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES-National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases D38 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 2 PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (/) Aesthetics (/) Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality ( )Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils (/) Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( )Mineral Resources (/) Noise (/) Population & Housing ( )Public Services ( ) Recreation (/) Transportation/Traffic ( )Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed protect, nothing further is required. • • Prepared By: J--b-~tol~ ~"""" Date: 6 Zs o~ Reviewed By: ~ Date: ~~y ~ D39 • Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less roan SigniLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pple"rally SigniLCam w"" Mnigacon Than S,gml¢ant N° Impact Incpmpratetl Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () (/) ( ) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments r 1 L J a) The project site is within a designated Special Boulevard and is located adjacent to a view corridor, Haven Avenue. It is the City's desire to have permanent locations within the City where scenic vistas of the foothills can be enjoyed. The four-story hotel buildings will have a setback of 139 feet from Haven Avenue and 92 feet from 6th Street, both of which are classified as Special Boulevards. With the extra deep setbacks as described above, the view corridor well not be negatively impacted, views to the foothills and valleys will be preserved for recreational driving, and the impact will be less-than-significant. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. The project site is vacant. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with Clty standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. u 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (/) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? D-40 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 4 Less Than Sign,6cam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g aptem~allr Si9nmcant wnh MitigaYOn Than SigmLCent No Impact Incpryoratetl Irrgact Impact b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? J Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located In the southern and eastern portions of our City that are characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as • farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The . proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the, FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is arecently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The nearest agricultural use, a vineyard that is not actively being farmed, is located approximately 1/4 mile to the south. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the protect: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? () () (/) ( ) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (/) O ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () (/) (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? J D -41 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 less Than Signii,cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppfantlally slgnemam w,fn M,agaoon rnan Sign,fsanf No npaCl InLOIOOfdf24 ngaef Inlpdtl d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project Is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and Impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use well generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction Is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. • Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. - As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air Impact study was prepared by Urban Crossroads that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 methodology (version 9.2.4) to evaluate construction and operational emissions. As shown in Table 4-2 (page 27), the emissions associated with construction of the protect under the worst case conditions are not expected to exceed pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD. The report estimates 997 daily vehicle trips generated daily associated with the operation of the project. As shown in Table 4-3 (page 30), the results of the analysis indicate that protect-related emissions for operational emissions will not exceed the regional pollutant criteria thresholds established by the SCAQMD. In addition, localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were analyzed in the air quality analysis by Urban Crossroads. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest receptor. LSTs are set based on ambient concentrations in the project area, and the distance to the closest sensitive receptors. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. LST emissions for construction and operations are shown in Tables 4-4 and 4-5, Pages 33 and 34, respectively. As shown in the Tables 4-4 and 4-5, the results indicate that the project does not exceed screening level LSTs for construction and operation. The project is not expected to have a significant • localized impact. Therefore, as required by the SCAQMD, an URBEMIS 2007 study was performed to calculate protect emissions, and the model results indicate that construction and operational emissions.of the proposed project would not be significant. The construction and operational D-42 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than SignR¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fpteni,al~r SBm4cant wpm MiOBaaon roan 9grnhcant No Irr,pact Incarycratetl Impart Impact emissions of the project are below regional and localized significance threshdlds for criteria pollutants as indicated in Tables 4-2 and 4-3. The full text and appendix (model outputs are located in the appendix) of the URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality study can be referenced at the end of the Initial Study Part II. CO Hot Spot Analysis: A CO hotspot is a localized concentration of carbon monoxide that is above State and/or Federal 1-hour or 8-hour ambient air standards that is generally associated with idling or slow moving traffic. Based on SCAOMD guidance, It is recommended that a CO hotspot analysis be performed if the project meets either of the following two conditions: 1) The volume to capacity ratio increases by two percent or more as a result of a proposed protect for Intersections rated Level of Service (LOS) D or worse, or If the LOS declines from C to D; or 2) The LOS declines from A, B or C to D, E or F. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Traffic Division has determined that the proposed hotel project does not warrant a traffic impact analyses, since it does not have the potential to generate significant traffic on local roadways. Therefore, because the project does not have the potential to significantly affect local roadways and Intersections, background CO levels in the project area are low, and project-generated traffic does not have the potential to create a CO hotspot. The air quality analysis by Urban Crossroads indicates that impacts to CO hotspots are considered less-than-segnificant. Global Climate Change Analysis: On June 1, 2005, through Executive Order S-3-05, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction targets as follows: by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020 reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; by 2050 reduce GHG emisseons 80 percent below 1990 levels. In 2006, Assembly BIII 32 (A632), the California Global Warmeng Solutions Act, was signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger, giving the California Air Resources Board (GARB) premary responsibility for reducing statewede greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The place of climate change in the CEQA process was acknowledged in August of 2007 with the approval of Senate Bill 97 (SB97). SB97 gives the Offece of Planning and Research (OPR) the authority to draft CEQA guidelines for addressing global climate change, and requeres OPR to develop guidelines for the feasible mitigation of greenhouse gas emisseons or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions by July 2009, and these must be adopted by the Resource Agency by January 2010. Although SB97 does not protect public agencies from CEQA challenges, limits are placed on CEQA challenges for certain infrastructure protects financed by Propositeons 1 B and 1 E. Carbon dioxide emissions associated with the development and operation of the proposed project were estimated using the URBEMIS 2007 model, and include emissions resulting from project construction, protect-generated traffic, project natural gas use, and emissions resulting from gasoline powered landscape maintenance equepment. Based on project greenhouse gas emissions estimates, et is not anticipated that the proposed hotel protect alone would substantially contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions inventories. It is estimated that long-term protect operations will result in emissions of approximately 1,748.55 metric tons per year of COZ. Compared to Californea's estimated 2004 greenhouse gas emisseons of approximately 492 million metric tons, the contribution of the project would represent 0.00036 percent of statewede emisseons. Therefore, the project would not have a segnificant impact upon global climate change. Further, the project will be required to comply with Title 24, thereby increasing building energy and water use efficiency, resulting In a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The project is consistent with SCAQMD's 2007 AQMP, as well as growth forecasts for the area. Therefore, the incremental contribution to criteria pollutants of the project Is not considered cumulatively significant. • • D ~43 C~ • Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Signd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pglemiaoy SigniLCant wim Miliga0on Tian Signd¢ant No I act Incorpp2teG Impact Impact Even though the construction and long-term operational emissions will be less than SCAQMD's regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures per the City's General Plan FEIR in order further reduce actual emissions: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any' construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCADMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. ~ • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. D-44 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 8 Less Tftan 9gmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g P°'en"ally Sgnrocant w"" Maigaa0n Tnan Signtl¢ani No I act Incomomted Impact Impact 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water duality Control Board [RW~CB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~g) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Flne Particulate Matter (PM,g) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project bases to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the Clty Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. t3) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR Identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. • • • D-45 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 9 Less Than Signtl¢anl Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources: PP g Pmemiauy SigmLCam With Mn,gauon Than Sigm(cam No Inpact Incorporatetl Impact Impact c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to [he pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. See also discussion, analysis, 'and mitigation measures under b) above. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located more than a 1/4 mile from the nearest sensitive receptor. However, during construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. See also discussion, analysis, and mitigation measures under b) above. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. • e) Typically, hotel uses do not create obfectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? D-46 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than SiBmhcanl less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pplenually 51Bn111Cdn1 wnh M,hpaapn Than SiBn~i~cant No IrtpaC Incpmomtetl Impact Impact f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments a) The project site is located in an area that Is substantially developed with warehouse, office, industrial, and office parks. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, the hotel project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, no known sensitive habitats are located nearby the project site. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O O (/) outside of formal cemeteries? • J D 117 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 11 Less Than S,gmfcant Less Issues and Su ortln Information Sources: PP g Paanhanv &gn,UCant wlm Mmgauon than SgnJ,canl No Irtpacl Incprporaletl Inpad IrtpdCl Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be Implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting ,the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) Indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the protect site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: • 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings D ~48 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of.Rancho Cucamonga Paae 12 Less Than 9gniLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pefenvany Sigmhcant wpm Mmgatwn rnan Significant No Impact Incoryoratetl Impact Irtpacf that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse eftects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) • • • D~49 • Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than SigmOCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pP g Fotenuany sgrnhcam w,m Muigauon Tnan siemacam No Im act Incorporatatl Impact Impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments • a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 3 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles north of the project site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to M,„ 7.5 earthquakes, is located approximately 14 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is located approximately 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. • 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWG1C8) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. D-50 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Spnihcanf ~ Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fefenfiany $Ipn111Canf w~fn MNpaOpn Tnan SipnNCanf Np Impact Incur pratatl Impact Im act c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.13. These soils typically have slopes that range from 0 to 5 percent. Runoff for Tufunga soils is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand according to General Plan Exhibit V3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.13. These soils typically have slopes that range from 0 to 5 percent. Runoff for Tujunga soils is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to and be served by the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an (.) () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () (/) ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? u • • D -51 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 15 Less Than SigniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fgtem,auy siBm~icarn With Mitigation Than SigniLCant No Impact Incomoratetl Impact Impact Comments a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located approximately 1 mile from the nearest school. Typically, the hotels do not create obtectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed protect is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan, but is within 2 miles of a public airport, Ontario Airport. However, the project site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. • f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. Fire Construction Services is requiring that the protect be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system, a listed Central Station Fire Alarm system that will monitor the fire sprinkler system and an automatic/manual fire alarm system prior to occupancy. With the imposition and installation of these fire detection and suppression systems, the impact is considered less-than-significant. D ~52 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than S,gntlsarn Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: se~i~cah~ Mi Baaon Signhhcanl No Impact ~ Incarporatetl Impact Impact 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. • • D-53 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 lass Tftan _ Sgndmant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g PoienLally , 9gnmcam w,~n Mitiga0on Than Significant No Impact Inver oratetl Im act Im act Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Construction Permit. The General Construction Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Pertorm inspections of all BMPs. • Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to D ~54 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 18 Less Than Signd¢am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 'pre"Dally s~gna~pam w"" Mdigaepn Than signdman~ Np Impact Incorporated Impact Im act ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc., to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide well increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. • • • D ~55 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than S,gmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pptenually signd,cant With Miogaeon' Than signincam No Impact Incorporatetl Im act Impact e) The project will cause changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Bwlding Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development (hotel); therefore, It is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WIMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WIMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. r1 L J 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. Additionally, the proposed project is a hotel and will not include any housing. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site Is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse Impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. D-56 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 20 Less Tian S,gnil¢arn Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Po~envally Srgn,i¢ant w,m M,t,gahon Tnan Signd,canl No Im act Incor olalatl I act Imgac~ 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments a) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding area and land uses (office, commercial, and industrial). The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Industrial Park, which permits hotels subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of avatlability of a locally important O O O (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. • • • D-57 • Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 21 Lew Than Sigmhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fpipntially Sipnihcent With MM1igaOan Than Sigm4cant No Impact Incomora~etl Impact Impact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () (/) ( ) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within'an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a protect within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels? Comments a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. Directly north of the project site is 6th Street, and directly west is Haven Avenue. Both Haven Avenue and 6th Street are classified as Major Divided Arterials. The protect site (hotel) is subject to traffic noise levels of 60dBA within 500 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue and within 146 feet of the centerline of 6th Street. Accordingly, a noise analysis was completed by Urban Crossroads (June 2008) to analyze interior noise levels and how the hotel could meet the following standard: 45dBA interior from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 40dBA interior from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. The noise study states that the traffic predication noise model indicates that exterior noise levels at the building fagade will range from 61.9 to 66.9 dBA Ldn. With a windows closed condition and dual glazing with a minimum rating of STC 26 or higher for all guest rooms, the interior noise levels will range from 30.8 to 35.8 dBA Ldn, meeting the City's interior noise level requirement of 45dBA interior from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 40dBA interior from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: 1) Interior: All windows for all guest rooms shall be dual-glazed and shall have a minimum STC rating of 26 or higher. b) Hotel uses do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. D ~58 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 22 Less Than S~gmLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g I=°'°"wally Sipnihcent w"" MiLpaoon Than Sigmhcanl No Impact Incoryoretetl Impact Impact d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with the manufacturer's standards. 4) The construction contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the trarisport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. • D ~59 1r ~I J Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paqe 23 Less Than Sigmhcam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fplemially Sigmhcant w~tn Miogaoon Than 5ipnnmant No IngaCt IncpmptataE Impact Impact 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () (/) ( ) directly (tor example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other Infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments• a) The project is located In a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, ii will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. • b) The project site contains no existing housing units or structures. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land with no structures. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with fhe provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? O O O (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: • a) The site, located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue, will be served by Fire Station 174, located less than 2 miles from the project site. The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. D-60 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 24 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pntanuallr Sigrnhcant w~ih Mitigation Than SiBn~hcant No Irtgact Incor orated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within-the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the protect site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the protect site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • • D -61 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 • u City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than Signnc~am Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g P°'°"oauy SgpIl,Cam w"" MM1,ganon rne° Sig beam No Impap Incorporated Irtwad Impact 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () (/) ( ) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () (/) ( ) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate a total of 1,243 average daily vehicle trips. The proposed project includes the development of a 122-room hotel. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each room will generate 10.19 average daily trips. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The protect is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The protect will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. The protect will have right deceleration lanes on Haven Avenue and 6th Street, which will permit safe vehicle movements into the project without impeding traffic flow. A bus shelter will also be included on 6th Street, which will encourage public transportation. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. The impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each hotel room will have a generation factor of .70 for two-way peak hour trips, resulting in 85 two-way peak hour trips for the project. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these D~62 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Paqe 26 Less Than SgniLCam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fetam,aor SiBn,LCant wnh Maigaepn man Significant No Impact IncoryprateE Impact Impact development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of building permits. The_prolect is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adtagent arterials. -The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The impact is considered less-than-significant. c) The site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, and is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will not create an inadequate emergency access. The project site includes two points of access, one off Haven Avenue and one off 6th Street. Further, Fire Construction Services is requiring that the project be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system, a listed Central Station Fire Alarm system that will monitor the fire sprinkler system and an automatic/manual fire alarm system prior to occupancy. With the imposition and installation of these fire detection and suppression systems, there will be no impact. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the protect will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • • D-63 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Paae 27 Less Than S,gniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Potemiaoy Sgmhcam wnn Miligaoon Than S,gml¢ant No Impact Inco raietl Impact Ippad e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga • and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any protect that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections • for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A protect that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. D-64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 28 Less Than Spmlicam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g '°'e""a"Y sg ibcam w"" M„igavon T"a" Sipnif¢ant Np Impact Incpmora,e0 I an I act The City has determined that the protect does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The protect is served by the CVW D water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Soled waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to Implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 77. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable tuture protects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • • Comments: a) The protect site Is located in an area that is substantially developed with warehouse, office, industrial, and office parks. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, the hotel project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the • project Is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, no known sensitive habitats are located nearby the project site. Further, based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. D-65 r1 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Less Tnan Signihcam Less Issues and Su ortin/~ Information Sources. PP `J Pplem,ally S,gniLCant wan M,agaaOn Tnan $ignif,cant NO Impact Incorporatetl Im act I act b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in. accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. • LJ c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certrfied September 19, 1981) (/) URBEMIS 2007 Air Quality Modeling Analysis, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) (/) Water Quality Management Plan, TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. (June, 2008) (/) Noise Study, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) D-66 Initial Study for DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant ehvironmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature" , _ ~f Date: ~ ~ Z lJ ~~ 'n Pnnt Name and Title: C!`r~' rr'"7 r~~~~/ ~- ~ X756 eUcz~ • • D~67 r~ u AIR QUALITY IMPACT ANALYSIS PREPARED BY URBAN CROSSROADS DATED JUNE 20, 2008 • DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER EXHIBIT O D-68 LJ City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated /or public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00542 Public Review Period Closes: October 22, 2008 Project Name: Project Applicant: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Project Description: The design review of building elevations ,and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. FINDING • This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. • October 22. 2008 Date of Determination - Adopted By D-69 RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. DRC2007-00542, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 122-ROOM HOTEL ON 2.97 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) WITHIN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0210-081-13. A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of DKN Hotels, filed an application forthe approval of Development Review No. DRC2007-00542, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifcally finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, with a street frohtage on 6th Street of approximately 562 feet on 6th Street and a lot depth of approximately 267 feet, and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the east is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) and is developed with a warehouse building; and the property to the west, across Haven Avenue, is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with a technical school; and c. The project site is vacant with no existing buildings or structures that require • demolition or a loss of a historic resource; and d. The applicant is proposing to construct hotel building, a permitted use within the Haven Overlay District; and D-70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 2 e. The project, togetherwith the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and f. The project design incorporates a plaza, a tower element that provides a strong focal point, the use of two primary materials, a Porte-cochere and decorative pavement, thereby meeting the design goals of the Haven Overlay and Industrial Park District by providing ahigh-level of architectural design; and g. The project will promote land use goals of the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District by allowing for a hospitality use to be developed in close proximity to office, commercial and food uses that will maximize the economic position ofthe Haven Avenue corridor by capturing regional demand for lodging facilities in the vicinity of the I-10 Freeway and Ontario International Airport. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the • Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that • the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the D ~71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 3 • Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. ' c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The project will be developed and plan checked in accordance with • . plans on-file in the Planning Department as approved by the Design Review Committee on September 16, 2008. Specifically, the plans submitted for plan check shall include the following items: • At the west elevation, on the ground floor wall plane, fireplace, HVAC screen wall, 8-inch by 16-inch columns, and low wall at the trellis feature, gray honed block will utilized. • At the west elevation, the trellis feature will utilize metal members. • The plaza will feature a seat wall with lighting, lighted bollards, and flag poles. • Colored concrete will be utilized at all handicapped parking stalls • The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways shall be designed per the Landscape Plan presented at the September 16, 2008 Design Review meeting 2) Approval is for a 122-room hotel with the incidental serving of beer and wine under a Type 41 license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The hotel operator shall adhere to all food service requirements and operation regulations for a Type 41 License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). • 3) Any modification or any intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Resolution ofApproval and all Conditions D ~72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 4 • of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00542 shall require the filing of any required land use entitlement(s), review and approval by either the Planning Director or Planning Commission in accordance , with the Development Cdde. Revisions to the hotel's operation that shall require either Planning Director or Planning Commission review shall include, but are not limited to, requests for an ABC license other than the incidental serving of beer and wine under a Type 41 license. Requests to serve distilled spirits and/or the operation of a bar shall require the filing and review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the issuance of all applicable license(s) from ABC. 4) All roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened by the parapet. 5) Wall, directional, and monument signs shall comply with the standards of the Sign Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Title 14). 6) All perimeter, on-site, and street frontage landscaping shall be completed prior to occupancy being granted. 7) All outdoor furniture and site furnishings visible to public view, including, but not limited to trash receptacles, benches and bollards, shall be uniform in design. 8) Final design of the enhanced pavement at the entry points of the • project, pool perimeter and project perimeterfencing shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval during plan check. Engineering Department 1) Haven Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Highway" Standards including, but not limited to the following: a) Provide north bound right turn/deceleration lane approaching a Haven Avenue driveway and 6th Street intersection in accordance with City Standard 119, Section B-B. This shall be one continuous lane starting five (5) feet north from the BCR of the existing main drive approach to the adjoining south property and terminating at the point of curb return at 6th Street (subject to plan check and City Engineer reviews and approval). b) Provide driveway in accordancewith City Standard 101, Type'C' and "City's Driveway Policy." Minimum width is 35 feet, measured at the ultimate right-of-way line. c) Protector relocate traffic signal equipment as required. d) Provide curb, gutter, commercial drive approach, pavement, • curvilinear sidewalk (6 foot wide curb adjacent through right turn lane), street lights, street trees and curbside drain outlet(s). D ~73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 • Page 5 Where right turn lane exists, simulate street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk. e) Protect, replace or install R26(s), "NO STOPPING" signs, and provide or replace additional traffic striping and signage as required by the City Engineer. f) Provide conduit for a future fiber optic cable. Location to be determined and approved by City Engineer, prior to approval of Public Improvement Plans. g) No new median openings in the Haven Avenue median. 2) Frontage improvements on 6'" Street shall be in accordance with the City's "Major Divided Highway" Standards including, but not limited to the following: a) Provide east bound bus bay/right turn lane on south side of 6th street, just east of Haven Avenue in accordance with City Standard 119, Section B-B. b) Provide driveway in accordance with City Standard 101, Type'C' and "City's Driveway Policy". Minimum width is 35 feet, • measured at the ultimate right-of-way line. c) Protect or relocate traffic signal equipment as required. d) Provide curb, gutter, commercial drive approach, pavement to centerline of 6th Street, curvilinear sidewalk (6-foot wide curb ad1'acent through bus bay), street lights and street trees. Where right turn/ bus bay lane exists, simulate street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk. e) Protect, replace or install R26(s), "NO STOPPING" signs, and provide or replace additional traffic striping and signage as required by the City Engineer. f) Provide conduit for a future fiber optic cable within the parkway g) No new median openings in the 6th Street median. 3) Proposed on-site private storm drain retention facilities are subject to Building and Safety Department approvals. If the on-site retention system is not designed for 0100, or if 0100 design requires a secondary overflow, you will need td show how that runoff will be conveyed to a public street or storm drain. If off site private drainage acceptance and/or easements are required, they shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. • 4) Sidewalk shall cross the drive approaches at zero curb face. Provide additional public right-of-way as needed by preparing separate easement deed legal descriptions for both the 6th Street and the Haven Avenue sidewalk/driveway crossings. D -74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 6 5) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of 8th Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Haven Avenue to the east project boundary. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. • 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction • measures imposed by the South CoastAir Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local • ordinances and use sound engineering practices. D-75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 . Page 7 Sweep streets according to a schedule, established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment, instead of diesel equipment, where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading • - plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required tc incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to • incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. D-76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 8 • Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. •, Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting • the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval ofearth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert • construction and notify the monitor of the find. D ~77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 • Page 9 • Prepare, identify, and ,curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino.County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,p emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. • D-78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 10 . 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc., to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to complywith obtaining coverage underthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Offcial for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Interior: All windows for all guest rooms shall bedual-glazed and shall have a minimum STC rating of 26 or higher. 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with the manufacturer's standards. D-79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 11 • 4) The construction contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any • time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and • adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: D ~80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 12 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • D-81 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00542 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) fortheabove-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly. and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department • 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D-82 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identifed on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verifed for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to'the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • u D-83 a 0 `~ r N J Q I- Z J U Z O z Z Q C~_ G z Y "~ 3 R Q U Q 0 A N ~ > -a N Q N O i z a ~ a LL ~~„ V N N ~p O ~. a` 9'+"A N::~a ter, ~ r ' ~ t Y~~T"t ~~' ~ v v v v ~"f~-' ~~~i: N N N N N N N E5'' ~, 1Q , _ ..y ~ ~3r7n.. ~ k`= ''~~ U U U U U U ' ~~ a U a a a a s ~~ a~ N C N C f7 C N C fn C y G y C ~~ f0 N R ro m ro ro ~~. a o. a o_ a a a `~ ~, ~ ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ , m m m m m m ~ M1.. "5S'[t " ' N N d N N N d ~ C ~i ¢ ~ ~ CC ~ fL ~ CL W~ ~!', , w f •~:d '~ ~~_ ;.~j. ~~4 -0 . h ~~ p p o O O O O r,x~~ ~ n. a m m m m ~;~~ ~ ? _ O C N C G L L N -6 O ro U O_ N ~ O ~ ~ L ~ n f °' = ~ O t ,'.~. ~ ro a..... La~roro .- o ~ Y o.~ ° L ° 2O w ~oo.._°a.. y ro x ~' ~ OIL ° m N U o ° -a m N ` i ' '` ~•- -O O. N N E O d~ C 7 N C i - J T O ~ to (n ~ O r SC; ,y~ r'~" O m O ~ p m L O C O Q a~ ` o o Q . p ~ O `~ ~~ ~ v i a ~ N~ _ ' a m -o v~ C N~ p o _ 3 in ~ ~ ` ' C U C >` q r~ >. Ol m m ~ L ro C T O O L 'F. ' S~ f~~" ~ ~~ ~ O~_ j a 0~ Q, ro O N C a B U ro N Q 'p ~ U ° ° UI [ s ydc ~ o_ ~ ro E m a m o ~ ~ (0 O p m E¢ U~ o - E > o ~ ~N { I + ~ ro o~ C L d 7 O O Y N «^ 0 0 p Ol >- 'O G E N -~- O , ~ O C e ~b L O~' ~~m ~ °roo E M mca>. a (d _c l o o ~ ~ - w y O O ro ~ O ~ ~ O v1 'O O ~ ro ro • " ro U L C L N ~ m ro ~n C ~ ~ L O O U ~ `~ N o = 1] y o~ ° °~ U ~ c Q '~ 0 3 0 ~xn, et > cn U a o° - ~ '°-c o E~ ` U 0 m- '~ 0 0 ~ ~ ro m ~' mQ ~'o °' o °' t~" o p 0 0 m C m' m > ~Qi.: ~ N •- L O N N ~ -6 rn N Q N y - op -O C -° m m o E -~ O 3 ~° o p L o ' °- i §§;'' ~ ' F Q c p ro y - L ro N m ro 0 d c •a ¢R O C m C - ? L ~i E C N O ~L ~' 0 U ~ L Q ° ~ ro O ~ N m `; o oa ° o ~ N m ° ~ Y ~-o E U `N o roL o 1--•~ °~ C U C m U c ~ O) N~ 4l f0 N O) C ~ ~ 'mss ~t ~ ~ ~°-~ 2'~o a~ i 2 °`~ ° o ~ E c E O1 m~ o~ ~ N ~mc °~ h m E N o o_o._ a_ .~'o ~ o o~~ ~° ~~ ~ d . X.a' ~inccm om-c~~'mc - - oo o>coa~>odmm ~m mm o~ ~ ~'• QoaEi°E~° n`_a-01oa~ia>>a~iEUE~d _ Gait ¢°c C~.S 0 T D ~84 N N V C' V 7 V 7 V N V ' a a a a ~ Q Q Q a s a ~ ~ °- _~ °~ _~ Q o o ~ ° o o ~ °- _ °' °' o `o o ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 3 3 3 m 2 m~ m~ m 2 m 2 3 3 3 N . O . U C y C y C y C y C y O O N ~ O ~ N > N ~ C J O ~~ C J O C J O C J O C J O > N > N > N ~ ~ ~ D v O U D U D v D v CL ~ ~ U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m m oo ca - c agmo o= -L ai '-' m~ ~a>.c c= '- aco c o ~- c ro ~~ ma c° m ro °a J L9= m _:3 NL L roa vi m~ ° ° L ~ Y mm - O C O N O N n N T y U C O O O ~ Q` O U d C ti N O O~ J O N R C L .~ ~ C O O CO 'y ~ y E O~ y O J N O o EL' ~ ~ ~ v o ° 3~ ~ a oUQ_m ~ o ~ m r°n E . ~ °-°_ ro E m E so Q E o " a i ~~- . a i ~m o -`o ~° ~ a y ,.-. m -O .... i ~ > a U> U Q O O ro L ~ J ro J a y O U L (0 ro O) ~ (n C[ o (n ~ J ~~ to C ~ N C N r - C a C L L N 3 j °- N I 6 iq O L C .N- C ~ N~ ~ (9 ~ C7 t6 L O S - U1 .d y y a ~ N C y N ro J L d L O .~ ° C _ ~ C tq O y ~ o-o ~ E S U ~ Q ro ~ ° J N a QE E N -a V 3~om ~ m ~ >-_ o J _ °' C N °- ~ ~c C ~ x ro -o ° mm a ~ ° Lro U o om? ro roo `oa roE L a oc~ roro. ~ E O O O ? 'C- ~ N O' d f6 O O (9 C J ~ U N O U U Q O N N d N U ro g .- v O y~ U a ~ O C d O O N C O E d O o N N ~~ U O N a O H O a J> ,~ U N a C C t6~ U 01 O L N o c .~~ wt~ ~-° °~° E° ~aci~~iU = .O a3 c~ - ~n° p~ 0 > U 3 Q Y y N ro > • X N J C C p D) N (n ro O L N C U :0 1] .~ ~- U O C 6 L ~~ N U Y X C to ro ~ U N x g m ° ~ N N a' ~ `m m 4 N y ` ~ N ~ - ~ L L C d X0. a` d ~... c ~ a i a~ c . mUL E v o~~ a a> ro s c o mro _c 3 w e LL .a ~ a> ~ _ U ~ ? 3 ~ c _ o n d ti 'O N Q j~ m E N y e A E U .N ~ U of ~~ .. ro C O to ~L-. N N ~ ro a L O Y Q O C O _ N ~ ~ C O d a ~Q .C -- ro ~ ~ ro U ro U mL- d C .>--. OU ` N y m `-' J L ~ U °' `o ~ U ti 3 ° E c J c U m ro ~~ ° `° o ,J -° U ro ° ~ ~ U O ~~ ~ - aro cn a~ 3 i c om° >. . o cnn~F° <n 3u> ~L° ° u, .~~,o m c i Oro J CY coo ro ° ~ U~ ~, ro U 3 a H u i ° R m~ h m F Q u W • O N D ~85 ~~~ ~~: ~~ , <.~~; N N N N C~ s~ l%~'~5 ~ M (") ~~s '~¢ aY- FY ~G d ; . ~ _ ciy " ~• ~ ~ , ~ (~~i~ Gln9 ' a o o U U ~ a a °a ° C y C ° C ti C f~ y `~-k`~ C ~ay:', r o r 0 -- 0 0 0 `o `o `o ~~~; o o `o ~`" N Q1 N N N fi:~~ N N N i'-~=Pe ~~ i '~ O ~ U U U U U ~~~ U U U ~:m S{!: ~` ~{ O O O ,,,~ m m ~ ~ o O O O '~ o ~ O a a n. m m ~w a m a ~.,~u N -O O i 0 O N O) Uj N 'O ~'y ~ N P c N 0 p -6 C~ N O N e ro N L N C O N O S] C D C ; Ya ro 3 L ~- ro L N C ro .- m N O ro j ro N to ~~ O~ 0 0 ._ C U ~? O N L . ~ ~ ~ N y dL w ~ ~hf4 N O ~ O N ~ ~.'- 9 y ~ ~ 'p - '~ L ~~ ~ U ~ N '00 t". ~~ G d C N m N Z3 ~ a°° '"~ 0.3~- D _ ro N ~ N _ y C N O p ~ N ~ ~ .C y',L ~ {.~ ' ~ o O p U O ro c N 0 C E m 3 ro r ' N L C w C . C > >` ~ w ~ N O m L O ~ O ~ C O~ ° G O O U C C Ebro O N n& ~ ~ ~ C N N N croo U ro .T ago C 'N ro o U ro o ' m -ro d ~ ~ - ~ m ~ o ~ N ~~ ~ ~ ~ m in o_ ;w+A cCW' o croi °c_'E ~ Y U ' N ~ ° cU O O) > ~ a ~~ Qm V .- O O ' .J U F} ~ ~ O O _ . Y O .~ ~ N ~~ ~~~ Nam m c ~ ~,~. m ' of ErL N o ao o ~ a ~ m ~'o_ o-~ _ro E ~ ` ro o L'~a ` E ~~ a~ ~ ~v~t? o mm U °~ m~m ~ ~ ro ° O ° ~ ~ r o r o ~ °' > ~ °' ° ' E~ E °i ~ E ~~~ o E ~ o >'o w °'~ i r ~ o~ m E ~ o ~ _~ omo~ o oro ~{~'a > a m-oroQ~o a m=>> m ro. ~ m c. Eo c E _ Em >. o. -...~; T .~ oLO ~ roo m ° ~ ~o -a~ m °m ~L~ oN~~ 'o °-o ~ ao _ U ~~~m` EEQ> roo a s ~Y -o N~ a ~~ o m °a . `c° ° °J ~~c N ~aY-°r Ea o ~ a`~i o ~ croi a `°~ cON L Lm ro> m"-o m~a~4°~ _ L~``°E" ~Emo o m 00 t6 _ ~ td O U . <0 O N N 'C p 'C ° y r. N~ ~~ t0 O~ .~ .- C O O E ~ O Q p - p p (0 ~ N ~ D_ ~ Od N N 9 O .- ~CG .- ~ ~ - p O ~- ~ 41 O y ~ s in E m C N E a ~ .B a _ N 0 ui a~ ro ~ u~ o L ~+ a~ C O N ` 'O ~ ~ N p O O ~ X N ~ ~ .- ~ ~ L '~ Y C 3 C ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~_ p W 3 O U N L U ' ~ ~ C p C N C N N ~ ~ :i~° t6 O. >~ L ro N ._ 6 .J ro 1 D-86 O C7 a a ° ° ° 'a a a a a o r r a a o. n. oa a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q U U U [0 [D m ~ • O m o D o o O o a ~ ~ ~ m a ~O ° ~¢ ` ~ ° ~c c `0r o°`~-° o~~~ ~~E ~~~~~ o00 U' Ca i W o a i a i ro _ o m `° m D E°~ m °r°~ ~m°~-°OO~`6o.o ° N=vi a a i? ` - ~~n`m E °- ~~ ~ n. o U E ` E E~° °_.,~ E o -~ i .N w ,~ a ~ ~ N° O v, c c °yam acioy~oQ `omo~~oEina~ ~ ~oo O1~ao~.. °~°m d;ma E~ca~ Y ~ mNEmma~ . m .~ 'yam ~ ~tOL° mm`° a m m-O -o o °~ r °~ ro `o ~ °E m o~'o~ ° o_= .c m._ ._ - o ~ . - c a `o a a~ ro c ~~ -a c0>. me a.5-O io o.3~~m -~o~ ~~ ~°o orb m E O m d a ~ ~ E : v ~ y C ~ C E ~ o .C ~ L O E O Y C l U O C -° ~ N N '- d C E ' h ~ ~ U t6 U .... O~ °- >' `~ a O p C - ` E~ N O~ ° C ° - t6 i '~ ~ . E 3 m ~-O ° o c ~ cn E o~ c o ° o. °- ° m m E E m ~ - r o >'-° o :c ~ L E - E ° m ~' ~° E ro °~~ Lo °o °~ nE~mc~ mQ~~ o oY ~ o o~~ ti O o~ E a a ° E cpO~a oL° o~ p E~ ~ aL n c ° a~ " a i ' a io ~ - U 0' o > ` ° ° 'i -° `~ - ac t0 d~ 0 ° L° m c c 'C '~ A C S- m~ ro N.c ~ m o E c U C A O a N 41 N p~ m N O~> L m ~ ~ D_ °_ ro -O ~ .-: >'._ E ~(0 .N y L ~l0 ~- C .-, m N C- O ~= C ... O N ~ 01~ ~ y~ . N E D_L ~ C ° °' C O~ O C N O'~ y C E w ° ~ ~ ~ ° ° U N O U N i~Em ro~RE O O ~ m °° y a a~`°o a~o° i a ~ o ` ~a~, - o~ oa~o ° o~= a E° 3ca-.o. -° m ~ o ` may ~°Q~ N° c .- vl y ~ a ~.c E" t0 j v~ °0 O E N O E m C d m ~ a~ L C C N E O_ ° d a U L~ O O_ O d N 'C L s O. R° U O L ` N t6 ~~ Ol d E C 7 2i °~ m O_ A N C ~ O `~ O O ~ O°°~~ ~ ` ` T N O? U N~ ~ d O` C y Q'C O L y°~ p ~ p C 0 domao~ o¢m ~a a m c-o~~=~gmoo-3 ¢mEa cnoa>-ono ~a mU roy>c°ma~~a°o o o °" m ° ~ - °°a~ E ~ ~• 0 • D ~87 d ay N '4'"~ ;t u~'4 a -` ~5 ~4_ s ~~: J'^"%a .F ~`^~x s?-'F: . ~ Vic ~..#."' [ Via'- <r (`') C' 7 V V ~~~ N °~ ". six i3~P p....~~ ti~'N ~4 p~~`tx; 9~ g;~ ~e' !~ f ~ y~' ! ~S; P ~ry .+ n g~5y~~ ~k. ry n ? ~~Z :~ = O e , ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ R ° ' " U :~ -;fir # ~~~ ~ O m:(5 4} :Y ~ N O ro ~ "~''''' C C C 0 C 0 G"F a ~ •+ 0 V 0 U U U O ~ , ~; .~ ~y my m~ m~ iA a~ ~ ~ ~ > ~"` ~ N ~ N C N C N P ~ > CC 3~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ C 0 ~ C ~ ~ C 0 ~ F~ f ±rty''?r.h..: °~ Q ~~~ . -i > "'ti SS1 ~x~. ~ ~d?iS~ . ~ U ~ ~ ~ U U U U ~4. : , to ~.~ ~rtf ~.$ P"~t ~+ r ~ ~~i~ ~~ ~ ~ m m m m ',5~r 1~ a~1eC•'"H_ m oro~ v ~~~ ~a'~z~ ~apL ro _o=o aN aco ~~, cE?~mmo L L C U ,J ~ T.~, L C U~ ro C= YO ~ N N C C O C O ro' .p fib` ro ro L i U O E N ~ o a a no °p °' o O aEi C 7 ~ ~ -c n - c o ~ ~y L ,DC .. 3 ¢ oo . " > ~ mc v c ~ °~ U ~ ai s m o o `° ro a oa U m U > -~ f' ~ a ~~ a `" CU ° ad ~W "~ tn N a~ 3 ~°' a ao~~ ~ > ~" o F' ~>m Q s a i o a~ro a E ro L 47 a ~ s~-s-~ ~* N >. O C N L N N Ol O N ~ ro L k~ ~ Ua > L- > O O ~ C _ ~ N ro 0 L d ._ N O ~ T_ C N U a O_ N N E N a C N~ ~ ~ U p _ r (n ro° N ° _ V 0 ~ ~ > o s°>Q o E `p a :: ro ° ~^ c 0 0 : a o o ~ o ~ _~ o a N a~ o ~: m d ' 4 ' - o o ~ o - ~ o y '.' ` C .- - ~, te .... N "J U V (0 ro > n ~ U Q t4 C 4 ~'U' =~ ta4 a C (~6 ~ ° ro ro 0 E a P- ~,' N C -6 N O) a a ~ p ~ >. N E N 1 .N ro .C ° 5,:~~ Y p j O- ~ > > ro N O C F O_ E N . ~ -''eN~ S] N~ O C O_ m L ro ro C jn N " E° N~ O) p N C N N ~ C N ..N h f65 ~1 N C ._ O O~~ p .> YJ y~ N , G~°a ;CnE S c0 ro O U >.~ N . U U 4 ° O) U ro C .- a "7 ~ QI a N ro "~ E N °~' 'B~ S U~ C in a ~U U1 L ~ L O) N - ro ' C O O N N ro O N E e~~, (C~,',, ~" N a Q ro ¢- N D_ C ~ ~ O p N ~ ~ _ y~ °~ O E ro >~ ~ U 2j ~' >, s;a, S] Cfl N mUU c d O C m> o ~_ o>N« ro m L S ~U" a~ 01 , `O'' O o ~a.~~ ~ m [n U ~ ~ ao { i? O ~ m O N . c aa ~ "~ C3 m ~ ~~ - in E ~ ~ p~ m L ~O ~ '~ ~ m i O` U E '~ N ~ E Q O L~ ~~ ~>: p ~ L ro O L O p `C7 D N S >i ~ LL H O O T C7 N w U S ro~ I~'Sti > d N> .6 N U= r 1 O D-88 a ~ ~ a N N N N N ' a a a a a C C C C C m m m m m n o_ a oa o_ `0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 a~ o m m m ~ 2 2 Q ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ U U U U U m m to m a7 O O O O O' m m m m m ca oaoa~o>o~a~~mE ~n~m m Sao camc U ' '- oomoomoo> C N C Y C L U L m a fA J C ~ a~ a E N 41 ~ ~ C N m d ~ a J L w ` ~ ^ o Q O _o o m. J~~ 0 3 m L~ C m y a ~' a> Q u a -. N N m m t6 U J O U m N~ N O L uJ .- ~ U Q O ~ C 4l m 0 O) ~ C Q_ O O n C ~ C N O 4? ~ U O 3 y> O~ N~~ O J d O p T to ~ O c °~ ~ m ~ v, E a ~ NOOac a ~a~L ay m NO o m ° y ° - a... c 0 L i m~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ cn N C ~ ~ m 3 ~ ~ a ~ ~ v. ~ o a i m ~ ° m.~ m ° ' ~ - - nmEErf-9mE~a~o°~ ~o °°oa r~oaro am~m~N ~ m~ o..aE.~~Uw~° ~ mmw- o Um -~ac°'a ~m~`o~ Jm L E U~ p J E 0~~~ 0 O° C E~~ N G C 0) N C .S .n vi a~ U1 '- O C~ T m ~ O ~ ~ C a E 4l N °- tq O O N w G~ - E~ m m 0~ O . C L d m . m o a E~o~UE ~ °~ a a ~' ~ . a i ~. ~ ° ' m v E- ~ sa i.~ °E?~ o.o>~ ~ ~~~~~~y° ~ c U ~ _m a c~ mo EcEY. ~d m -° o o a m ~c J _ a o'ma~5` ~ am:ca~ m`°N°'a , m~E N 4~°2 oa~="o -macicE ~ NEo °mm .. . ~ C C y N~ N C N C~ O L W?oam o> U m N ` U °- 3 0 o~ L~ E S Q y m a 'Op a U U T O c ~ cro~~; N ~ U~ O ._ m y O N C ~ _E o»r ?m_ 9 0 c6 -o E m- N Oa m~m~ ._ a C m ~ ' ~ ' - y a O o y L O J N« p o > m 3 h a J m ~ aN~Q °m~Emo c° Y OO ° o3~N 0a > = ~QO~~o~ ~ o m m m._ m a N m ~ ~ o_a o o y m c N d- ~ m m U b m o ~° o > ~ ~ ro a ~ N` ~~ m `m ~ t° m ~ m ° ~ .° .3 ~ o_ c a ~ c m ~ c = c o~.E .J m a i ¢ a C7 ? ~ a a i vi c i o E ~ . a ° !~ N ~ ` ~ C7 O m C L .C ~ O m a C U m m m> N ~ O F= ~ ? E C C i UJ N C ._ ~ Ul p .~ .ro C C= 0 ` C~ ¢. a o "a o~ ~ o ¢ ._ o U 3 J m N N O w a ._ J m .- ~ v m a L L T O T F- .~ ~ a° m O O N C L ._ ~ O ~ U ._ a m ~ E o_ ~ • O • D ~89 iL~ a.~.v: ?1...:.-~-~~ ~Ymx} ~:.. `i~:'R: V N N €~~~,y a N V V V f_ti r 3~ ~ g a *Ss; ~t ~~ `` U U ~~ U ~.u3 ~",~F !n ro (n r4 m `''st m D Q „tj ,L C C C C _ O ~ O 3z O O U O U O U O U N ~~-~; € ' N ~e Q ~ E m i Ol i O) E .~ y?s a .~ ?s%3.~ r~ ++ '' C N N C N ~ N C N N `~~ `~ ~' O ttl L O O O ~ O ~ O Q Q ~rt aUU DU DU DU ~~ '~ ~`~` U U U 0] m [0 U U U axa~~ -`" ~.~; %~*+#;. ~,~a `.x=~ , , , ~~~ O i~s~~ ~t~: m O O ~.~>~ O O O O m m '~ m m m m ~p d ro E O ro~ O N T H ~~ C y~ ~„~^x':~a. N [O N uj N C 'O m T E N ~ r z E N t6 N N U N ibe"- C - O C (tl O ~V (0 N ~ C w N ~ ~ a N ~ ` _ U _ C L m N > (/! !t1 Y N 3:sik~ .N- ~ L Ol a ~ Y ~ ` ~ U O >' ~t/J N ~ N O N ~9 in Y O C} N ro L ~ u;;M...xa ~~ k'A., L U ~E °a C N. O ro 3 oa ~ m ro ro N O 3 U m ~Qmo,o~~m>, w ro U ~=mr. y.N°w ;~~;: Nm a>3c o~~ N _ro~o ` aro c c ~ ° ca o_O ow ~Q~Q~'~' EU ~ ccn ~ o m m ~ oa c N O ~` N N 'D ~~ o O~ Z- OL-. t0 O~ Z > O~ ~° C _ N >, E N U N ~ac~°-caa mro ro' ~ ~>~Zm EY~n 'Eo ~~ Z ro ` E a o E o_~r p ~~~ _a ~ ~ mm~~a~~C7ro op ~y aso xr~°~ o_..p"~c~ ' ~P` ` y ~ o o mE Y o-" DEL o.~~ -N~ ~ - a E ° c ° ~ ~ o m ° ~ na ~ ~ ~ o E" o 0 oa „~ E m'~ m - o'" ~ a3 - ~ o ~ o o. -- E a~ '' ~i > --' a c m E ~ N ~ o o p~ m o :. +. w -o w~~;~; cg > m ro __co m N 3o o cN o c _ mp~ ° ~L o c . x c ~ c c ,a a' cm o m m ~--"'-v m , ~ -o m o O `°_o ro o ai m °-o g` 3 >~ a~ - m - -o ~ °~ N ~ ~=fib z m ;.~~:a ~` `0 5 i s ~' > w ro ma c m ~ ~ m-~ ~ m o_ ~ ~ p U ro ~ m c - C ~ fl W N ° E ; me m >> C ro ° m ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ m C ° o E " _ E N C >` . (6 -°°'s ~m°' o~ O > ,-- m>~ E "~ ~~ -°o~ mEa c _ °` i O _ _c w U p p _ a EoE ; o~ ro N c nro m o ~ - ~m> i c °co~cmE c°°E°~ -Zm°J'~'.'t~: _ 3a oan oa °i` gam= ,_ a E ' c - °~ of maipr m~ O N E U n~ oN~o~o E-~ yr' N N O ' a Q N ~ o v~o L ~ -a y C N (~ _ ~ N C (7 N y N o~~ n d .o ~oo ro U ~ x. ea, U ~ o'~~roEE~~o~°o~~a .. `-°~ U 'o~ro ` o O ° `n .- . ~ E-°~c~~~~ ~ .~~O~~w~~~m~N~ °-mm Tni-°o m E~ Ua~a E °a° °-~~=~Oo~m °Q=~'oo~m'So~"on ~~L ao~~~ ~a.~mm ~Qm d N.S 3~`0~ Eom d m 3mUm o-°mU :Z ~-o `o UL S c F m Ein F o~ 1 D-90 O a C O G O C O C y C y C y C C C ~ O ~ O Q O U U U O m O O O m m d E m~ m -a U~" m E m ~L~ ~~ ~~ c-p °-°L N N d d N -° ~~ O~ O N N m >' m N 0 >' N .O N Ol m ... ~~ma x c °'~03~°'L o N N 3°a°ooYoo °NN E a~ °aT ~ Um...m"L~ ~3CY~~°~o ~ N m L~ N N d O 7 7 0 X U O ,~ L C U N ~ ~ O O O "' O N p N N °- YO -O N C O- N O m ' N °_ E m m N '.' m Y ° N [6rNd ~~o m :,JU yEmw. ~ N C mcd E°' _C ~-O a ia N ' L N O d 0 ", «6 U O '~ m N N N ~'.>-- m i .C m O '_' > L.. ~~ m . ~ ~° m aNi 'o ^~ o N~ c° o~ o° 0 U m - ~ ~ o - a m o m (p -- C ] O tI~ t/1 C U ,~ ' ° O C :~ L m C N - 3~ m C O O C .~ O p) C N m p~ O ~~ p~ ° _ L m .~ .... f O N ' S O N = O~ C C ° 0 C m C ~ C C O O CO U fn N O p 'O N -O N° m 0 0 E L - t/f C Y ', m N E ~- O N O~ = N~ C> -O °~ N T Q N~ ° C m U ~ C U ~ Q' N ~ L= ~ Y~ .L- ~ O)~ G - U U- U N ~ d m U N N ~ N N X -O ~ C°~ N ~ U m d` m N U - O m~ 0 ~ >, A N C ~`- C m m L O > N Q N ? O 3 m O° Z N~ U - ` ' ' O E` o~ O d L E C LL- NON o- - -- N O -O O • -• m O -O ~~ m ~ ~ _ o~- o~3 o T° _ C m mo~m oot Y N C° O C' C O U N ~' N N O j U~ 0° tq `~T QO N'~ dL ~'6 'O to 'O _ L - ~`° O) ~ E U C N C N .N ~ ` -6 [0 -O N a N -O N~ O N N ~' ` -° C C m d Nm3C _ N '~m 0>N mO N~U'O O-O ~CNC L~ N O~ lA ~ N d m m Om O f~ 0 0 N L O Y C U t/1 '- -6 C UD fn L y y ._ to O C m m G O Y N S L C L m d U fn N c 0 .~ .> d Q N Y U N s U O a Y • D ~91 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 SUBJECT: 122-ROOM HOTEL APPLICANT: CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DKN HOTELS LOCATION: SECTION OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET, APN: 0210-081-13. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Completion Date A. General Requirements • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-57, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay.any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,926.75 X B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • SC-1-05 1 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2007-005425[dContl 10-22.doc D ~92 Project No.DRC2007-00542 Comolehon Date C. Site Development • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department fo show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the Time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved _/_/_ by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so • as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and _/_/_ the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. D. Shopping Centers 1. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, _/_/_ free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCODAM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2007-00542StdCond 10-22.doc D-93 Protect No.DRC2007-00542 Completion Date 2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the / /_ Planning Director: • a. Architecturally integrated Into the design of (the shopping center/the project). _/_/_ b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to _/_/_ include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. _/_/_ d. Roll-up doors. / /- e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. _/_/_ f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. _/_/_ g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed _/_/_ to be hidden from view. 3. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. _/_/_ 4. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and _/_/_ debris remain for more than 24 hours. 5. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza _/_/_ area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. E. Bu ilding Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _/_/_ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and • streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Details shall be included in building plans. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. W hen a side of any parking space abuts _/_/_ a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall _/_/_ contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, _/_/ and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/_ parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall; whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more _/_/ parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2007-00542StdCond 10-22.doc D -94 Prgect No.DRC2007-00542 Completion Date G. Trip Reduction • 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily _/_/ residential projects of more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. W arehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. 2. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus _/_/ shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus shelter shall be located outside public right-of-way and shall be privately maintained. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _/_/ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within _/_/_ commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking _/_/ sial Is. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one _/_/_• tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _!_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 7. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering _/_/_ sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue and 6th Street. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of _/_/_ Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on the submitted plans that Xeriscape requirements have been met. I:\PLANNIP:G\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2007-00542StdCond 10-22.doc D~95 Protect No DRC2007-00542 Completion Date I. Signs • 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory pertormance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. K. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Posial Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~TE : ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) L. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g., Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC 2007-00542) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2007-00542StdCond 10-22.doc D-96 Protect No DRC2007-00542 Comolehon Date 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/-/- 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy Issued by the _/_/_• Building and Safety Department. M. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2007-00542). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in eftect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and tees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter). N. New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property hne clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC _/_/_ Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. _/_/_ 6. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. _/_/_ 0. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ pertorm such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & St} rep\DRC2007-00542StdCond 10-22.doc D~97 Prgect No DRC2007-00542 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building • permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on HAVEN AVENUE 60 total feet on 6TH STREET 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 3. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. • 4. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. Q. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res 8 Stf rep\DRC2007-00542SidCond 10-22.doc Completion Date ~ ~ -~-~. / / / / / / / / / / -~-~- -~-~- D~98 Protect No DRC2007-00542 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other HAVEN AVENUE X X (c) X X X (e) 6TH STREET x x (c) X X X (f) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Continuous right turn lane on Haven Avenue for driveway and at 6th Street. (f) Bus bay right turn lane on 6th Street. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction ,project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. Completion Date • -~-~- -/- . -/-/-• -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- / /_ -~-~- • I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOPAt.A\2008 Res & Stt rep\DRC2007-00842StdCond 10-22 tloc D-99 Prgect No DRC2007-00542 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon s¢e or larger, shall be installed per Cdy Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. • 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size qty. HAVEN AVENUE 60' O C. FILL FOREGROUND Magnolia grantliflora ~ NCN 6' INTENTIONALLY IN P A 8' OR GREATER, 'Majestic Beauty SPACED THIS GENERALLY IN FRONT FAR APART OF SIDEWALK P A LESS THAN e' Magnolia gtantliflora NCN 3' 20' O C. Sl. Mary PRIMARY TREE IN 26' O C MASSES, MAINLY Brachychiton populneus Botile Tree e' INFORMAL-IF BEHIND SIDEWALK MAINTAINED DY CITY 6TH STREET Magnolia grandrtlora NCN 8' 30' O C. 15 a' OR MORE 'Malestic Beauty GAL P A LESS THAN 8' Magnolia grantliflora NCN 3' 20' O C 15 'St Mary' GAL Construction Notes for Street Trees: • 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. R. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 2. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan for both Haven Avenue and 6th Street. S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. \J P\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stt rep\DRC2007-00542StdCOnd 10-22.doc Completion Date _/-/ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- D100 Protect No DRC2007-00542 Completion Date 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the _/ /~ Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. T. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for alt _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the Clty. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • U. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with _/_/_ direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. _/_/ V. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/ visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or mare roofs of this development. They shall be _/_/ a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 10 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMMt2008 Res & Stt rep\DRC2007-005425tdCond 10-22.doc D101 ,yr,,`"~_,o.,`:; Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District x * ~ ~~.' ', A C" ' Fire Construction Services • ,~-~ . STANDARD CONDITIONS September 15, 2008 Charles Joseph and Associates Gene Fong & Associates (4) Story Hotel SEC 6`h St. & Haven Ave. DRC2007-00542 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT The RCFPD Ordinance FD46, Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at rcfire.org - FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants shall be in accordance to the 2007 CA Fire Code and RCFPD Standard 5-10: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants. ~C-2 Fire Flow 1. The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed is 3,375 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 3. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 4. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 5. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems ~tomatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the 2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed D102 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System 8 Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler. monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1~` story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24-feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-• inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. k. Aerial ladder access shall be provided on the east side of the building in accordance with the 2007 CA Fire Code and RCFPD Ordinance FD46. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2007 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail- safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed. outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. D103 2 j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. ~ Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating • the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 6. Roof Access: There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder, shall be provided in buildings with construction Features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field ~pection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or eration not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases Public Assembly • Dry Cleaning Plants Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents Repair Garages • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. • Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: D1043 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fife District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire. underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter.to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services'. "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be • installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. D105 4 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain • an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8'/z" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. u r1 LJ D1065 x ~ - ~~ .~ ~;. T H E C I T Y O F R A N G U O' C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: October 22, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow for synthetic turf. Staff has prepared a negative declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to City Council for further action. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) provides a synthetic turf rebate • program to both new and existing residential properties in the Inland region. The program offers a $0.60 rebate per square foot of synthetic turf with no minimum or maximum. Some Rancho Cucamonga residents have expressed their wish to install synthetic turf on their residential properties to the City Planning staff. However, because of the language limitation of landscaping in the Development Code, Section 17.02.140, the Planning Department has been unable to approve the use of synthetic turf within the City limits. Currently, the State of California is experiencing a shortage in the water supply. All cities and counties are encouraged to reduce their water consumption. ANALYSIS: The 2006-2007 winter was a dry one for much of California. The Sierra snow pack was the lowest in nearly 20 years, while Southern California logged its driest year on record. The Colorado River Basin has experienced below average runoff for 6 of the last 7 years. A federal court ruling this year requires the reduction in the delivery of water from the San Joaquin Delta to preserve the Delta Smelt, further reducing water supplies that affect our region. State reservoir capacities are at severe lows, with Folsom at 31 percent, Shasta at 34 percent, and San Luis at 13 percent. While California is no stranger to historical periods of drought, each drought brings with it a need for enhanced conservation. In June of 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger declared a statewide drought and encouraged local water agencies and districts to assist regional and state agencies to reduce water consumption locally for the remainder of 2008 and prepare for potentially worsening conditions in 2009. An estimated 60 percent to 70 percent of all residential water use is used for landscaping. Turf is one of the largest users of water in landscapes, using an average of 77 gallons of water per square foot annually. An alternative to natural turf in landscape applications is synthetic turf. Synthetic turf has been around since the 1960s and until recently was primarily used in sports venues to replace natural turf. The quality, cost, and availability of synthetic turf have now made it a suitable option • for residential and commercial applications. Most synthetic turf is comprised of an open weave recycled rubber backing, with synthetic "grass blades" installed on one side. A layer of crushed recycled rubber or ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 22, 2008. Page 2 sand is applied after installation to give the turf bounce and enhance water drainage. Installation requires the removal of all existing turf and installation of a layer of decomposed granite to provide a stable base for installation. A weed barrier may also be installed. The synthetic turf is then laid out, trimmed to the shape of the landscape area and secured with galvanized nails or staples. Maintenance consists of sweeping or raking the surface to remove dust or debris. Brushing the turf "against the grain" will bring any matted areas to life. Water can penetrate the surface to be absorbed. Some synthetic turfs claim to have a life expectancy of 20 to 30 years, although there are no established life spans industry-wide. In addition to reducing water consumption, the use of synthetic turf can reduce the use of fertilizers that can potentially increase groundwater nitrate levels as well as reduce the emission of greenhouse gases used to mow traditional lawns. The intent of the Development Code Amendment is to provide synthetic turf as an alternative to natural turf to enhance water conservation efforts within the City. As proposed, this amendment does not impose specific development standards on the installation of synthetic turf, as we currently do not have similar standards for natural turf. With the current cost of synthetic turf between $8 and $14 per square foot installed on average, staff does not anticipate a widespread retrofitting of existing landscapes from natural to synthetic turf. Natural turf costs between $2 to $4 installed on the average. Planning staff has fielded less than a dozen calls from property owners interested in using or switching to synthetic turf in the last 6 months. Should the need for specific development standards arise, staff will pursue a Development Code Amendment in the future to address these issues. • FACTS FOR FINDING: The purpose of the proposed Development Code Amendment is to allow an • alternative to natural turf material to help conserve water supplies within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, while retaining the look of lush landscaping. Prior to the approval of any amendment to the Development Code, the Council, based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, must make a finding of the consistency with the General Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning Department has prepared an Initial Study pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As indicated on the attached Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant affect on the environment; thus, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and circulated along with a public hearing notice. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper with aone-eighth page ad because more than 1,000 properties would be affected by the citywide scope of the amendment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval of Development Code Amendment DRC2008-00593 and the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts to the City Council for final action. Respe ffully submitted, ~ d~-~ Jam R. Troyer, AICP Plan g Director JRT:JN/ge E-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • October 22, 2008 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit A - Initial Study Draft Planning Commission Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment DR2008-00593 Draft Ordinance for Development Code Amendment DR2008-00593 • • E-3 • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow for synthetic turf. Staff has prepared a negative declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to City Council for further action. 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: An ordinance that will change the definition of landscaping in our development code to allow for synthetic turf as an acceptable alternative to natural turf. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 5. General Plan Designation: Residential Very Low (<2 Dwelling Units/Acre) Low (2-4 Dwelling Units/Acre) Low-Medium (4-8 Dwelling Units/Acre) Medium (8-14 Dwelling Units/Acre) Medium-High (14-24 Dwelling Units/Acre) High (24-30 Dwelling Units/Acre) Commercial Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial General Commercial Commercial Recreation Mixed Use Mixed Use Industrial Industrial Park General Industrial Heavy Industrial 6. Zoning: • Residential Estate Residential (1 Dwelling Units/Acre) ~XHI~IT A E_4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 2 Very Low (<2 Dwelling Units/Acre) • Low (2-4 Dwelling Units/Acre) Low-Medium (4-8 Dwelling Units/Acre) Medium (5-14 Dwelling Units/Acre) Medium-High (14-24 Dwelling Units/Acre) High (24-30 Dwelling Units/Acre) Commercial/Office Office/Professional Office Office Park Commercial/Office Community Facilities Village Commercial Community Service Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial General Commercial Specialty Commercial Freeway Related Commercial Recreational Commercial Regional Related Office/Commercial Regional Related Commercial Regional Center Mixed Use Financial • Hospital Mixed Use/Retail Mixed Use/Office Industrial Industrial Park Light Industrial General Industrial Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): Regional Description Rancho Cucamonga is located in the Inland Empire of California in San Bernardino County. It is located 37 miles east of downtown Los Angeles. Direct freeway access to the City may be taken from the I-210 and I-15 Freeways. Unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino and the City of Fontana are located east of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Upland is located west of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Ontario is adjacent to the south and southwest portions of Rancho Cucamonga. The unincorporated area of the County of San Bernardino is located to the north of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga encompasses a total planning area of approximately 50 square miles. Thirty-eight square miles constitute the incorporated area, augmented by a 12 square mile Sphere-of-Influence that generally extends from our City's northern border up to the • San Bernardino National Forest. Rev. 3/13/07 E-5 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 3 • The predominant City pattern for commercial activity is characterized by the commercial corridor along Foothill Boulevard, accented by the planned clusters of commercial and service businesses at many of the intersections. The northerly two-thirds of the City are predominately residential, while the southerly one-third is largely industrial. Commercial centers are mostly located along the main easUwest spine of the City, Foothill Boulevard. The northerly edge of our Sphere-of-Influence is dominated primarily by open spaces of various types - a transition from the San Bernardino National Forest and Mountains that frame this part of the West Valley area of the San Bernardino County. Area Description Not applicable. The proposed project involves the adoption of a text amendment allowing for the use of synthetic turt as an alternative to natural turf. This project does not involve a site specific development. Site Description Not applicable. The proposed project involves the adoption of a text amendment allowing for the use of synthetic turf as an alternative to natural turf. This project does not involve a site specific project. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Jennifer Nakamura (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): N/A GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM~o-Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G • Rev. 3/13/07 E-6 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 4 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Aesthetics (X) Biological Resources (X) Hazards & Waste Materials ()Mineral Resources ()Public Services ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Agricultural Resources ()Cultural Resources ()Hydrology & Water Quality ()Noise ()Recreation (X) Mandatory Findings of Significance ()Air Quality (X) Geology & Soils ()Land Use & Planning ()Population & Housing () Transportation/Traffic DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find h t e proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGr/ TI' DEC ARATION(~wi~lllble prepared. i /~' /~ Prepared By: U'i~h./n/U Date: "( ~~ w Reviewed By: i y' Date: ~ Z~ /D~ • • • Rev. 3/13/07 E-7 • Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than $ignd,Cant Le55 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptenually $igmLCant w~:n Mitigation than 9gn,hcant No Impact Inwmoratetl Impact Irtpact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () () (/) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the area? Comments: a) The proposed ordinance will allow for the installation of synthetic turt as an acceptable alternative to natural turf throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since turf is installed at ground level, there will be no impact to any view corridors according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. • b) There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The visual quality of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will not degrade as a result of this ordinance. The ordinance is designed to allow individual homeowners and developer's flexibility in landscaping their property to reduce water use, GHG emissions from lawnmowers and overall maintenance to the site. Synthetic turf mimics natural turf in visual look without the maintenance required for natural turf; therefore, there will be no downgrading of the visual character of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d) The ordinance will not increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. • 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The proposed ordinance will allow for the installation of synthetic turf as an acceptable alternative to natural turf within the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga. For existing sites that could be retrofitted with synthetic turf, these sites were already analyzed for agricultural Rev. 3/13/07 E-8 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Tnan SignNCam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ap+eMially Signdsant wnn Mnigaaon Tnan SiprnOCant No Impact OCpmpralB.' rtlpad mpaCl resources as part of their initial Development Review and Approval. Future projects that propose the use of synthetic turf will require separate environmental review. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) Please see 2.a above. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () () () (/) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air ,quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () () () (/) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any air quality impacts. b) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any air quality impacts. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was • u • Rev. 3/13/07 E-9 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than SigniLCant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pae"pally Signnsanf w"" Mitigation Than Signd¢ant No Impart Incorporatetl Impact Impact ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any air quality impacts. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. A concern raised in the State of New Jersey regarding the use of synthetic turf was the potential for lead to become airborne and create a health hazard. Lead is present in the pigments of some synthetic turf products to give synthetic turf its green color. The Consumer Product Safety Commission on July 30, 2008, released its evaluation of lead levels in synthetic turf and determined that newer fields had no lead or generally had the lowest lead levels. Although small amounts of lead were detected on the surface of some older fields, none of these tested fields released amounts of lead that would be harmful to children. Given that the proposed synthetic turf ordinance will necessitate the installation of more recently manufactured models of synthetic turf, no adverse impacts are anticipated. r1 LJ • e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; typically, the installation of synthetic turf does not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () (/) ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and W ildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () (/) ( ) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Rev. 3/13/07 E-10 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 less Tnan Signil¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptenualy w~tn Tnan Sigmhcant Mieganon SignJ¢ant No Impact Incp oratetl Impact Impact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) Sensitive species potentially occurring within our city limits include the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF), the California Gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. A few remaining parcels of land contain Delhi soils which could provide suitable habitat for these species, although recent surveys have not identified any DSF within the City boundaries or in the Sphere area. Recent surveys have identified breeding pairs of the California Gnatcatcher within the Sphere area. The San Bernardino Kangaroo rat may also occur within our Sphere-of-Influence. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The installation of synthetic turf requires the removal of the top two inches of topsoil within the landscape area to allow for the installation of compacted decomposed granite. In doing this, animals cannot burrow under synthetic turf in the same means as natural turf. The sensitive species identified above reside mainly within the Sphere-of-Influence, where little or no development currently exists. Any future project that might indirectly result from this ordinance would be analyzed for impacts at the time a site specific project is received by the City. Existing landscapes that are rehabilitated with synthetic turf have previously been disturbed due to urban development and considerations for sensitive species were made during the initial development review and environmental assessment. General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, includes a map that depicts the area of sensitive biological resources. If it is found that a project indirectly resulting from this ordinance occurs in areas designed for sensitive biological resources; care will be taken to coordinate all new projects with California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to avoid impacts to the species or to develop mitigation measures. b) Please see Section 4.a above. c) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any potential impacts to wetland habitat. There are also numerous streams, drainages, and a bog within the canyon area in the Sphere, some extending down into the City boundaries. Many of these properties have been designated as Open Space and Residential so that the land would maintain some or most of its natural conditions, thus maintaining the connectivity of that parcel of land with the surrounding natural habitations. Any new site specific project would be required to undergo a separate environmental review, which can include coordination with California Department of Fish and Game and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop appropriate mitigation measures, if it is located in areas mentioned above. d) Please see Section 4.a above. u • u Rev. 3113/07 E-11 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Sibmhcarn Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pofeoually Sgntlicanf wpm Miff BaOOn Than Sigmhcanf No Impact Incur orated Impact Im act e) Any future project that occurs indirectly as a result of this project would be analyzed for impacts to heritage trees. All new projects would lie required to comply with the Tree Preservation Ordinance in Chapter 19.08. f) Please see Section 4.a above. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantlal adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: • a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any potential impacts to historic resources. Any new projects proposing the use of synthetic turf would be required to undergo a separate environmental review where an analysis for impacts to historical resources would be conducted. b) The Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Any future project would undergo California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review where an analysis of archaeological resources would be conducted. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any potential impacts to palentological resources. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore the proposed synthetic turf ordinance will not create any impact to human remains. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources • Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 E~12 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Then Significant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poianaauy wim Tnan SiBni6cant Miapatwn $igmhcant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act 6. GEOLOGY.AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse etfects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology .Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () () (/) ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The installation of synthetic turf typically does not involve significant above ground construction -synthetic turf is applied directly on top of the ground with no supporting structures above it. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The installation of synthetic turf requires the removal of the top two inches of topsoil within the landscape area to allow for the installation of compacted decomposed granite. For rehabilitated landscapes, this is often done manually with minimal problems of dust control. For new protects, a separate environmental review will be conducted and mitigation measures implemented if needed. c) Rev. 3/13/07 The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated • • E ~13 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11. Less Than Sign,hcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 PplanOally S,gnd¢ant WRh M,I,gaOpn Than S,gnd¢ant No Impart Incpryolatetl ItnpaLl Impact with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The protect would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, it will not create any impacts to wastewater disposal systems. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () (/) ( ) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the protect area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, the protect will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. A concern raised in the State of New Jersey regarding the use of synthetic turf Rev. 3/13/07 E-14 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sgml¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially slgnd¢an~ Wilh Mnigallpn Than signiapant Np Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact was the potential for lead to become airborne and create a health hazard. Lead is present in the pigments of some synthetic turf products to give synthetic turf its green color. The Consumer Produci Safety Commission on July 30, 2008, released its evaluation of lead levels in synthetic turt and determined that newer fields had no lead or generally had the lowest lead levels. Although small amounts of lead were detected on the surface of some older fields, none of these tested fields released amounts of lead that would be harmful to children. Given that the proposed synthetic turf ordinance will necessitate the installation of more recently manufactured models of synthetic turt, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) Please see 7.a above. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Please see 7.a above. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impact is anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impact is anticipated. f) .The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf should have no impact on any emergency response or evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated. h) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impact is anticipated. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? () () () (/) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a nei deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? u • Rev. 3/13/07 E-15 u • Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less T"en Sgnihcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 'pfenflally Sgmhcam w"" M"ipalmn T"an sipnihcant No Impact Incorporalatl Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater , drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (/) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudilow? () () () (/) Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The future installation of synthetic turf will allow for water to permeate and keep groundwater on-site in the same manor as natural turf. No impact is anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf will reduce landscape water consumption, while allowing water to permeate, which would free up water _for current and future development. No impact is anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf in rehabilitated landscapes will reduce landscape water consumption, while allowing water to permeate, which will not cause changes in absorption rates or drainage patterns. Future projects developed inadvertently as a result of this ordinance will be given separate, project specific environmental review. No impact is anticipated. • d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf will allow for water to permeate and keep groundwater on-site In the same manor as natural turf. No impact is anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 E ~16 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Then Spnihcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potamially Sipmhcanf wpm Maigafion Than SiBnihcant No Imoact Inco orated Impact Impact g) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No housing units are proposed with this project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No adverse impacts are expected. The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No Impacts are anticipated. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time; therefore, the proposed ordinance does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? • u • Rev. 3/13/07 E-17 • Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Spml¢ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp 9 Pmem~anr Sivn~licam wpm Mmpaoon Then 9pnnmant No Impact Inrofpprdtetl Impact Imoacl Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. • 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () () () (/) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a'private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf is anticipated to have no additional noise levels than installing traditional natural turf. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf is anticipated to have no additional noise levels than installing traditional natural turf. No impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the protect. u d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf is anticipated to have no additional noise levels than installing traditional natural turf. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 3/13/07 E -18 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Tpan SipnNCam Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: °[,e"daily SigniLcant w"" Maipaaon roan SipmLCanl No I ad Incorporetetl Impact Impact e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turt is anticipated to have no additional noise levels than installing traditional natural turf. No impacts are anticipated. The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf is anticipated to have no additional noise levels than installing traditional natural turt. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) . The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (/) b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) • C~ • Rev. 3/13/07 E ~19 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Tnan SiBn~l~cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PplenLaoy Sgn,LCant w,ln M,hpat,on roan $IBnnlCanl No Impact Incomoraletl Impact Impact Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on fire protection service levels. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on police protection service levels. No impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on school service levels. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on park services. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on other public services. No impacts are anticipated. • 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on regional parks or recreation facilities. No impacts are anticipated b) Please see 14.a above. • 15. TRANSPORTATIONlTRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Rev. 3/13/07 E ~20 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than SignAmant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pctentlally Sgnii¢ant wnh Maipation roan Signihcanf Np Impap Incorporatetl Innact Impad d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on traffic. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on traffic. No impacts are anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should not increase hazards due to design features in the area. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed synthetic turt ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? () () () (/) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? • • u Rev. 3/13/07 E -21 u Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than S,gn,hcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: amen°allY S,gmficam w"" M,bgaeon Than Sgn,hcant No Impact Incpr OIa12tl mpaC~ mpeC~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) protect from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's protected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The future installation of synthetic turf will allow for water to permeate and keep groundwater on-site in the same manor as natural turf. No impact is anticipated. b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The future installation of synthetic turf will allow for water to permeate and keep groundwater on-site in the same manor as natural turf. No impact is anticipated. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on storm water drainage facilities. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The future installation of synthetic turf will reduce landscape water consumption, while allowing water to permeate, which would free up water for current and future development. No impact is anticipated. e) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on storm water drainage facilities. No impacts are anticipated. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on solid waste disposal. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. • g) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time and should have no impact on solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev- 3/13/07 E-22 Initial Study for DRC2008-00593 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than Sgnil¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pp.envauy $IgnIflC2ol w~~h Miogaaon than $igmLCani No Impact IMplpO~afetl Impaet Impact 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () (/) ( ) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) Sensitive species potentially occurring within our city limits include the Delhi Sands flower-loving fly (DSF), the California Gnatcatcher and the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. A few remaining parcels of land contain Delhi soils which could provide suitable habitat for these species, although recent surveys have not identified any DSF within the City boundaries or in the Sphere-of-Influence area. Recent surveys have identified breeding pairs of the California Gnatcatcher within the Sphere-of-Influence area. The San Bernardino Kangaroo rat may also occur within our Sphere-of-Influence. The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The installation of synthetic turf requires the removal of the top two inches of topsoil within the landscape area to allow for the installation of compacted decomposed granite. In doing this, animals cannot burrow under synthetic turf in the same means as natural turt. The sensitive species identified above reside mainly within the Sphere-ot-Influence, where little or no development currently exists. Any future project that might indirectly result from this ordinance would be analyzed for impacts at the time a site specific project is received by the City. Existing landscapes that are rehabilitated with synthetic turf have previously been disturbed due to urban development and considerations for sensitive species were made during the initial development review and environmental assessment. I~ General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, includes a map that depicts the area of sensitive biological resources. If it is found that a project indirectly resulting from this ordinance occurs in areas designed for sensitive biological resources, care will be taken to coordinate all new projects with California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to avoid impacts to the species or to develop • mitigation measures. Rev. 3/13/07 E ~23 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 21 • b) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) The proposed synthetic turf ordinance would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies all categories having no impact or less-than-significant impact. Any future project that indirectly results from this ordinance would be subject to separate environmental consideration and review. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section • 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCR #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) U Rev. 3/13/07 E ~24 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2008-00593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Page 22 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: ~ Date: / ~~ 0d Print Name and Title: • • • Rev. 3/13/07 E ~25 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration. is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 Public Review Period Closes: October 22, 2008 Project Name: Project Applicant: City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map): The proposed synthetic turf ordinance does not involve a site specific project at this time. Project Description: A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow for synthetic turf. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. October 22. 2008 Date of Determination Adopted By • E-26 RESOLUTION NO. 08-58 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593, MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF LANDSCAPING IN SECTION 17.02.140 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR SYNTHETIC TURF; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment DRC2008-00593, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifcally fnds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of • this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a signifcant impact on the environment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives the Development Code; and • e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by encouraging the conservation of water supplies in coordination with the Cucamonga Valley Water District. E ~27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-58 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 22, 2008 Page 2 • 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA; and (ii) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission therefore is forwarding the proposed Negative Declaration to the City Council for their final consideration as the adoption will reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on their initial findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration by the City Council. c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning • Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. - 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment No. DRC2008-00593 by the adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher. Chairman ATTEST: - James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do • hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: E-28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-58 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 22, 2008 • Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • • E-29 • DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 AMENDING SECTION 17.02.140C OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF LANDSCAPING TO ALLOW FOR THE USE OF SYNTHETIC TURF; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On October 22 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning this matter and took action recommending adoption by the City Council of this Ordinance. 2. On ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the adoption of this Ordinance. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • SECTION 1: The facts set forth in Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts the Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. • SECTION 3: The proposed amendment is consistent and in conformance with the City's General Plan by encouraging the conservation of water supplies in coordination with the Cucamonga Valley Water District. E -30 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 22, 2008 Page 2 SECTION 4: Section 17.02.140C, Chapter 17.02, Title 17 of the Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended by amending the definition of Landscaping to read as follows: a. Landscaping: An area devoted to or developed and maintained predominately with native or exotic plant materials including () turf (natural or synthetic), ground cover, trees, shrubs and other plant materials; and also including accessory decorative outdoor landscape elements such as pools, fountains, paved or decorated surfaces (excluding driveways, parking, loading or storage areas), and sculptural elements. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. • l J • E-31 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C~~tt O C U C A M O N' G A Staff Report DATE: October 22, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AMENDMENT TO VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request-to change the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation from School to Mixed Use to allow for single-family Low-Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) designation for 8.79 acres of land, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive - APN: 0227-171-29 and 30. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18449. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative DAclaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 3.53 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Wetlands and Single-Family Residential; Low-Medium Residential, Victoria Arbors Master Plan (4-6 dwelling units per acre) South -Long Meadow Drive and Single-Family Residential; Arbors Master Plan (4-10 dwelling units per acre) East -Victoria Park Lane and Single-Family Residential; Arbors Master Plan (4-6 dwelling units per acre) West -Victoria Arbors Park and existing wetlands; Park Low-Medium Residential, Victoria Low-Medium Residential, Victoria C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use Low Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) North -Mixed Use Low Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) South -Mixed Use Low Residential (4-10 dwelling units per acre) East -Mixed Use Low Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) West -Mixed Use D. Site Characteristics: The project site is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Place and Long Meadow Drive. The site is vacant, with no structures, and weeds covering the majority of the site. To the north and south are single-family dwelling units; to the east across Victoria Park Lane are single-family dwelling units; and to the west are the wetlands and Victoria Arbors Park. • ITEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: A. General: The site falls within the Victoria Community Specific Plan and the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The streets surrounding the project site were installed when the Rancho Etiwanda area was mass graded, infrastructure was installed, and the adjacent subdivisions were built. On August 27, 2008, the Planning Commission approved the applicant's proposal for a 31-lot subdivision with no house product (SUBTT18449) and a Minor Exception application to increase the perimeter walls to a maximum of 7 feet 8 inches in height along Lots 3 and 4 and 14 through 16, contingent upon the approval of this application. The subject application seeks an amendment of the underlying Victoria Arbors Master Plan to change the land use designations from School to Mixed Use Residential (4-6 units per acre), which is consistent with the General Plan designation of Mixed Use. B. Environmental Assessment: The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards at build-out, according to General Plan Exhibit V-13. Furthermore, according to Table V-6 in the General Plan, the project site is subject to noise levels of 60 dBA within 3,155 feet of the I-15 Freeway. The project will also be exposed to noise levels of 65 CNEL or greater along Victoria Park Lane. Because the project is subject to the noise levels that exceed the City's exterior standard of 60 dBA from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 45 dBA standard from 10:00 p.m. to Z:00 a.m., an Exterior Noise Analysis was prepared by Mestre Greve Associates (MGA). The MGA Noise Analysis recommends masonry walls ranging in height from 3 feet to 5 feet along the perimeter of the project along Victoria Park Lane to mitigate the exterior noise level to less than 65 CNEL. The plans indicate that a 6-foot high wall will be constructed around most of the • perimeter of the project. Since only a subdivision is proposed at this time, and based upon the recommendations of the study by MGA, building surfaces will be exposed to noise levels of 64.9 CNEL along Victoria Park Lane. Any necessary mitigation measures to reduce interior noise levels to City Standards will need to be re-evaluated when the house product is submitted. MGA made a recommendation that the interior noise can be mitigated with standard window installation and air conditioning in the residences on Lots 17 through 29. Sound walls in accordance with the height recommendations made by MGA and a requirement for an interior noise analysis when the future house product is submitted, are conditions of approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT18449. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality, geology and soils, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. C. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held one neighborhood meeting on June 5, 2008, at Etiwanda Gardens to discuss the proposed project. Approximately 9 residents; John Morrisette, • Project Manager of American Beauty Development Company; Robert Lacoss, Project Planner of PDS West; and Stan Morse, Civil Engineer of MDS Consulting attended the meeting. The residents had questions about the subdivision layout and several questions regarding the future F-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00047-AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 • Page 3 size and price of the homes. The applicant was able to answer general questions regarding the layout of the subdivision, noting that only a subdivision is proposed at this time with no house product. The residents were in favor of the project and liked the fact that the school was not going to be built there. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve the attached resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC2007-00047 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, R, ~'~~ Jam R. Troyer, AICP Plan ng Director • JRT:SF\ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Aerial Photo Exhibit B -Site Utilization Map Exhibit C -Neighborhood Summary Letter from the Applicant dated June 5, 2008 Exhibit D -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC2007-00047 • F-3 • ~~ Y rm*~ _" ~~ ~ N A ~i H s ' a. ~ ~~S ~ ~ j .,~, °~ 'Eiflr ' ~y 6 9 ~~ ~ . ~ ~ e IN ~~ .J O ~~~0 ~ l _ p~ iVMC~ ~ ~ j I U~y~ ~' F-4 ~K~~~Q~ elm Q U~ g u_ ~~Z Jx~a a~F-Q~~ 0 ~^~ 4Uz N~Q~~ U F- CA ~W~~m v> ~1'F1Q ~F W V J~ C~ U ~o C U R' ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 lii ~ j Z ON? ail ~l~il N 4 ¢m P $ U ~ i ~ Q~ ou ~ ~~ cc f ~ ~ VO~u _..l ~ ado. ~u~h~ W~ 11 ~ 1 i '_--_ M:;if-___~ ._ _ ~, ~.~~G T = II li~~l ~ ~~ Y._L1;~~ Fr:J ---7 i ~---~---~ ---- -----:Ini. r----~ I i, -__:rnfflfliHliio - I --~I r-"^:~ i,.r,~^'r.`;•. 1 ~__ I ~I F1,iE____ _ 4L' _ ~ L II I _'~ .I ~ ,;.: f ---- _~ : , --- :i.';9 ~ ~,- ~-----_` Iflffif~flrti ~fn = -I -,.-1I 11r- -`. .,:': /w . - --- . ~ I---- ---.rft-' -----ai~ir----= ?!il!!!Ilf;fl'fr" e al -- F~1 ~r = '--- ~"~.~i ----~ ~ ;F=--r-- j I =_'~Ilit --- =---~iilc-----Z1~~kJU~imiwkll>a--. Fv+~~-__-_I_ ~ " °.aTr?, _ I,II ~___ ~%__~I' _- ___ li.~--J~y~ _-61~I ___ ~gY r ~ =_~~a _ 's€€~ ~~t p\.~ . ___-'III ~_~,/1___ i ~-- Bl '~, 11} _~v9~_ tl ~y,~ .~..,~Jr_'~y~ .'l I: '.~C-- •g~WtD=iTJ~'. 'tee 9>~~_~ ~ ., 1 _ _ ff y.'~-an ~ ~ly. ~N1J 1'"L° '.G~~.,^~~; .'- \`` .: j`'~"'?=r~%:.: Le~.-n^. '_"' =:.~_.~: :~ y }' . `TT _I_ _ _ -`~ _~_-r'-_ I-: I ti; - -~ . ~ y 1~ !I 111 I ~ I I 1 ~.__ _BONOVA ww~ ~ 1 \ - y 3 ~~ ~ 1 ~, 1 kl ~ __«_ 1 99 ~C1d" •)9310 _ XO(p- - ~•~' l_ 1 ~i '~98 ~ 4~e.S,i r ~t~y,~~" t ~, l ~~~ : '~rl /r 17~~~ ~'~~~~~~ ~o /` I'`` ~~~~ .a e ,~ r 1 f, ( yl _y ,W d -o ~ _ ..~....~..e.~- ~.:w - "=~' Vi ~s ~~ • -. gtig 1 ~~w'l~ _ .ntFi i :t °T ..--- _- --- '-.,v::?fy.... ~ ~ '. F, :~,iGA lkly ..Ni.( 5~,: ,_~ yji ':v~ ~.; t i fi --~ ' . ~..r _ .. - _ r _ 1,.•y-.V.. ~`;'~(,~: - =;L ~ F,`i 4' '' ~ . ~ I X111 ' a~~ T,,'~ °. „F~' J ° ~ 1 I I I ~ I I : e~- . ~c'"~t~ >;~ _ 4^ ~.i'~,+ ~ i .a r z~l ~ Ji~ i~ ~lbr~ f ~.1' I I I I I ~ ' j~ ~;. ~ r> _ ~`~ J .'-- a: ,.~,m-"6~~rtr: ':~ r.~ ?'t~.~~ ,~. ~'S' ~ YJ ~"SS sa, • V30ry_ ._ ~ ~~-~, asi-. .~."~`:~~'\' .3 3 ".)f: .3• ~~1 dot t`4'~' ~ ~ ~~ i ~" ~~ ~~ I „~ ~ ~~~~~ I V ~ __'11 it ~ ~ I _ .1, ~.1.~~\, - :?~~ " ~~ ~:{ ~,. _' ~:I :&f ~ `^~ 1~.:~~"~..'w._ :I y -1--5-~_ In .f-i-w~~ (I'IY-'~.~~'i;" - ~-?;,=g, :~ _ .?~fe- i ~`n~iq ~`y9- _-„~~ :~I.ys I ~--ill u _ ~ .i:t._ __ .."` rJ, Ir--<~ ~ 1:,: =~~~~- - ~~~=~ ~ ~===~~= -- -- -= --- - `' ~1:~=~=- ~ ~- - ~ _ ~_..~I ~ jJ~~Gq G.' ._ - -~, +4:1;(",..'~`.-~ k~ '_~'rcY. ~ i _ d--:--r-`~ - Ib i1.;`"'i a"( ~q~~~ V~"t'4 •~ ~~t .=,'-`-~:i°:~~'~ ~ -_I~_"1 ~ ~`s„- ~t~-- I' ,~~i~ Ir e'~- 1 ~-'\t 4V` ~-'6rr, `'# - .i~: - r _ - 153333 _ a F r ~ C.5 raw. ~°-' -- _ ~,~ '_ 3N0-~ /:' ___ .Q v.._ F,; t~-~ (`c~ -~ ~i. I :[i5ji {E,`-yet _-.1,53H~3.w+~e~'„91 ~~~~ 1, tI~~ ~~~ -___` - - ~~ ~" •I ^]~.~- -_ ___ -_~~@il Vic. i w - ~ N`. •..~ _ ~ ~.i I ~_-.~''vir ~,i ~~ ~~. _ __~--~:r'--'E,-e~'" 4._.~-F.'- --- ~ z emu/ I --- i I ~~. _---+~ `z`==;~-~~s's~y=; ~;;.' `gym ~;.;? ar~:t.,i~ '''z~--1~`~#~e~'~_ ~_~'~t;:~~r- *--- -'-L-'___~~ '11•'x__'_. .:__'~, ' "'ii e~.~~.L.; r:^._~_g ., ~~ '.r;. _f~~f-~"1' ,~---/-~~. •..,' tl~r -_ YI ~ - • - I~ ~ I i ` ~ ~ti it ~t "i 1 J ~~~I 1 m .l~l ~ u I 1^ ~d.~-any >'m _-.yy~ i,~... ,~'.~~fi `9:_-z---~'-~ `___ ~I~I ~(u $ R ~q~ i~ ' = ~ ~-- ~~~e ~~ n ~ p00iv3N .~ I ~-3Ntlt0 '-M33tlR ., I' ~.. I~ i I ~~ ~.aL'a,INbs . 2 I ' I I I II 7 + ~ I ~ ';I F_5 " - --~~, I ~ • TTM 18449 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING 6-5-08 In addition to the nine neighbors (see attached sign-in sheet), the following were present: Steve Fowler Project Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga John Morrisette Project Manager American Beau_tyDevelopment Company Robert Lacoss Project Planner PDS West - _- _ Stan Morse Civil Engineer MDS Consulting =_ Mr. Morse gave an oversight to the projecfr:design_"'lot sizes, density, access, relationship to adjacent projects. The neighbo~s~we~e concerned aboui house sizes and sale prices. Mr. Morse and Mr. Morrisette discussed that the current project was only for the creation of lots and st~'eets.and that the-h5'ouses would be the subject of future public hearings and neighborhood-meetings. ,~,_. Mr. Lacoss gave an historical perspectij planning process and!.'~;:h°ow~y,ten year accomplished and„rpomted ~o,ut. some v,~re~p, realization much like°,the conceptual sk ~:~.~ design and constructi'on;;(preparation, I easily take 1'/z years noti^iith°sfa"nd~ing'al- == .. !~,, G ~~: !.I i:~"i.4.1 :rill ~.:.(pifi ~ ila:i.: ` -- '~..~ Tai the'Victorifi;;Arbors and Victoria Gardens ~~,''"the vision for the area had been is such as Arbor Street that came' to is. The team also discussed schedules of sing and site construction) which would rent economic condition. • G\778\00\gen\Neig hborhood Mig doc EXHIBIT C F-6 •~ NEIGHBORHOOD MEETII~lG ~ TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 Etiwanda Gardens June 5, 2008 7:00 PM SIGN -IN SHEET Name Address Phone # 1 S~ ~~~ C~r~\eZ ~7 h\\ ~c k Creep a~\ ~c~,- =1-3~ -~~(oa ~ • 3.~~1~~~ o ~ ~~~~, ~s~~ wl~a ~I~e v.~.,,~ ~Z~, z~~ ~~ 3-~ 4..~TFPH~Fh~ ~~ U l•~JAIu l lZb\\ JINZ~~4t~ r72 gcx'(-~(S6'6~~1~' S.~I~Y-(e,(a~nn ~i,.,IliyGl~~- I',~Ioll l/iv~yI-t~/e~r `~L1^.n cg~b91(a/l q-4(3/1~6q 6. l J~TiC ~•4.~ ~I9~N~ ~l~ ~ ~CI. ( 't'~2'Q~\ j ~ ~ _ (d ~ ~lv >-'T 5~ 7 B. STr~r c,~n I~,)~s~~~ "~SYllo fJVC,K C'n~e t- ~/ ~~g•(~3C'• ~/ISJ 9.L,z Q,~~w, ~s-~I h„~k c~~,~j~ ~'1 ' °1a9~{63-~ISIc~ to it 12 AT' • F'7 Qly o(Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division (909)477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL II`,IFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key fo move from one line to the next line.) INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONSWlLL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the bme of submittal; City staff will not be available fo perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Tentative Tracl 18449 Project Title. Tentative Tract 18449 • Name & Address of project owner(s): CUCAMONGA 220 L.P. 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 Encino, CA. 91436 Name & Address of developer orproject sponsor: CUCAMONGA 220 L.P. 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 Encino, CA. 91436 Contact Person & Address: John Morrisette 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 Encino, CA. 91436 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Robert Zoller MDS CONSULTING 17320 Redhill Avenue, Suite 350 .Irvine, CA. 92614 F VATelephoRe Number: (949) 251-8821, ext. 212 "`~ ~ v ~~ ® Paq~ 1$ f 9 Created on 11212007 3:50 PM `1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide aset o/color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): Northwest corner at the intersection of Victoria Park Lane and Lon 4) '5) '6) 7) Meadow Drive Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): g g1 ac. / 383,760 sf. Net Site Area (total site size minus area o(public streets & proposed dedications): 6.81 Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): ( See attached 1 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: City grading permit, sign permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including in/ormation on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The site was once mass graded; therefore, the site has no natural vegetation and no trees. There are no _ structures currently within the property. The property generally slopes from the north/northeast southeast corner. The existing elevation along the northeast boundary is approximately 1283 and falls approximately 20 feet to an elevation at th southeast corner of 1263. The adlacent streets Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive, are fully improved except for the parkway and sidewalk alonq u • EnvironmentallnfoForm.doc Page 2 of 9 Created on 112!2007 3.50 PM F-9 Information indicated by an asterisk (') rs not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. • Environmental Information Form Initial Study Project Information and Description Question 7: The applicant requests to change both the current General Plnn and Zoning designations for the property. The applicant will change both designations by amending the Victoria Arbors Specific Plan. The applicant requests to change the current General Plan designation from Elementary School to Mixed Use Single-Family Residential. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to change the current Zoning from School/Institution to Low Medium Density (LM)single-family residential. • • F ~10 the northerly right-of-way of Lone Meadow Drive adjacent to the parcel's southern property boundary. There exists sewer, water, gas, electric and storm drain within Victoria Park Lane and water, gas and electric within Long Meadow Drive. The proposed radio for the Tentative • _Tract will be at grade or below the existing berm elevations along the existin wetlands mitigation area The proposed storm water will be cleaned through a proposed system of parkway swales prior to connecting to the existing storm drain line within Victoria Park Lane. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): No known cultural and or historical aspects exist within the property. The parcel is vacant and surrounded by existing Single-Family Residential housing and Victoria Arbor's Park. • 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses: Victoria Park Lane is adjacent to the property's easterly boundary. Noise sources will be mitigated with a perimeter wall and existing construction standards. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) i/necessary: The project proposes 31 single-family detached residential lots frontin onto two proposed public local streets. At the time of the Tentative Tract map submittal the number of construction phases has not yet been determined. The construction of the site improvements are anticipated to be completed under a single phase. • EnvironmentallnfoFOrm doc Page 3 of 9 Created on 11212007 3:50 PM F-11 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): North: Wetland Mitigation Area East: Victoria Park Lane South: Long Meadow Drive West: Victoria Arbors Park 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character o(the surrounding general area of the project? No • 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? _The proposed short-term noise will be generated by the construction activity however no Ion -term noise is anticipated. *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements o(mature or scenic trees There are no existing trees within the orooerty. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: None • EnwronmencallnfoForm doc Paae 4 of 9 Created on tl2l2007 3.50 PM ' F-12 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A /or usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residentral (gal/day) 18.600.00 Peak use (gaf/Day) 37.200.00 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) ,0.00 Peak use (gal/min/ac) .0.00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ^ Septic Tank ®Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarittcafion, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 8.370.00 b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) 000 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 31 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: size: 5.500 SF Maximum Lot size: 11 Average Lot size: 7,700 SF Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): N/A • l J 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $0.00 to $0.00 Rent (per month) $0.00 to $0.00 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: iJ/q 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: N/A • Enmronmentallnfo=orm.doc Page 5 of 9 Created on 1/2/2007 3:50 PM F~13 24) Indicate the expected number o1 school children who will be residing within the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: • a Elementary: 14 b. JuniorHigh~ 9 c. Senior High 6 25) Des~ribe type of use(s) and major (unction(sJ of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of 27) Indicate hours oloperation: • 28) Number of employees: industrial, or institutional uses by type: Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shin: 29J Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, in rate of hire for each classification (attach additional shE and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the 30) Estimation of the number o orkers to be hired that currently reside in the ~ City: '31) For commercial and i dustrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount o/air pollution be verified through e South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): • (Data should Paoe 6 of 9 Created on 1!212007 3:50 PM F-14 ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service fo the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. • Yes CVWD - "Okay' IEVA - "Okav" SBCFCD Rancho Fire District - "Okay" 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PC(3's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any o/the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to • be used and proposed method of disposal. The location o/such uses, along with the stgrage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statem s, and information presented are true andcorrect tot he best of my knowledge and belief. 1 further understand that additional inf rm ion may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cu onga. Date: 1 /3/07 of • EnvironmentallnfoFOnn.doc Page 7 of 9 ~ Created on i/212007 3:50 FM F-15 - ATTACHMENT A • Water Usage Average use per day Residential Single Family Apt/Cando Commercialllndustrial General and Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family Apt/Condos Commercialllndustrial • General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Heavy Industrial Source: Cucamonga County Water District Master Plan, 6/00 • 600 gal/day 400 gallday 3,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 2,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gallday/ac 270 gal/day 200 gal/day 2,000 gal/day/ac 1,000 gal/day/ac 1,500 gal/day/ac 3,000 gal/day/ac EnvironmentallnfoForm.doc Page 8 of 9 Created on 1I2I2007 3.50 PM F-16 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: • Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School • 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 • EnvironmentallnfoForm.tloc Page 9 of 9 ~ Created on 1!2/2007 3:50 PM F-17 • I' . ~: i ~..~. I I. 11 'm a' Four 32 :i I~ BdSE 'I-•-.'... •~ i%_ _ , ' ~I ~,Etiu•anda 'I i `I i. ~', I_ .: / , r; r _ Pa MILL EP aVC I•~ ~i , . JI ~ ~ ba I W ' 0' I ~ i.. ~ O [•~' ~ •~ O 4 ! Sch f . .q Y - ~\ v ~ y: \ /: o r ~/ // .-. •. _ r _ ~, : ~' ~_~ _ ~-- ,- _ •, =;11 :::-:;~ k . 1 .......... i,l...:.. a5. ~ zl ,~- - -d. VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 GUASTI QUADRANGLE SECTION 5, RANGE 6 WEST, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t~32D REDHILL AVENUE. SUITE 35D, IRVINE, CA p261a 948.251.8621 o MD6Consultlnp.n~f F 1 o PkB~U5G5 Doc ~RAG7'".F~.~37i ~ I ,.(Slf~1_f-FAMILY i I %'RI:S1D@M1ALJ ' ` B ~ ~ I I,~ ~~ ,( ~ ~ B ' ~ \ VICTORIA ~ ~ -'~ 1 - tianc~,noH ~. T n 1 ~~~ l J a~:= i f ~e ~1 ~14' ~ t~'yy i r ~ `` t~ ~ ,_ ~~ \1 \~ ~ aL ~~ ~ ~TRAC7 Ab.,'~37?I~~~ ~ 'fig.,:, R y~~\ ~ \~ l ~. \ \~ B ~ ~'1 '' ~\`~ i - I _ ~. I~ 3 ~~ i6 I I i \\ l i ~: \ i .r-: ~,~-~~ ~` r~s`"~ \~~ 1`1 ~`~~~~ i 4 \~ V~~ ~~,~{,v~. ~ 1~L \`` 1 ~11~~,/ y~ `~++pp 11\1 1\b1lw 1~ 111 1 N 1\11 6 CIE, 91 Y; 11~-= y~ ~1 ~I 1!-I~p.~411 11 Ili FU ~~ II'', iln TENTATNE TRACT 18449 I N7. I I I I ~_~C_ I I I I I I t- - ~ . 7RAC7 No. f5D98 (SNULE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) -- ,, it I ' ~ IIl ~__ ae I ao I so I s~ I sz I ~ -°';e....„,~-~_ ~ '- ~ _`-.._.~~,... , ~. -, =~I~Er- -(s>r~~-rartiLr 'pock= _ ;~ --~ ~ ~ 1 eo ~II ~ '~~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ l ~-- -•- ---~noEwraaU- - _ -- ~ -= -~ =~ _ r ~ '~5'i I~--~~1 A ~I; ~ I I ~- - - II ..9~~~~,,. ~-i-~- ~-i T=v`-~'-"1-~D'1~-~~~~!~>i~I 2 ~,li I ~I~ 2 !I6 1 38 135 I 34 I 33 132 I 3'1 ~~ 30 ~ ~ ~i~ ° ~ ~_ -~ k i - ~,~~ ~ ~ I~I R ~ - - I I ~ ~-_._ n. I ff~ _-~: ~ 611 3 t~~i. ~ Ii 3 ;I. ~~S J~F4@ CUCAMONGA 220 L.P. 16830 VENTURA BOULEVARD SUITE 401 ENCINO, CA 9143fi Am ::.., _ LC _., c • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 1 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA .~' ~ .. _ " k~ 17520 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 33D, IRVINE. CA 92614 949.2b1.8821 MDSCon.ul}Iny.n~t r-a~ G:171B10p1cor~MDS\T7M Plennirp App PkplPholo ExNW4slPlroto 1,Ooc .r.. ,~3~'.__ -~, ,:~: ~-~ ~ =~ „. VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 2 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA C~ J ~ _ y;. p' ,: ~.~, ~ , h ri 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350. IRVINE, CA 62674 949.261.dd21 _,., MDSConsultlnfl.n~t ~=-a3 G:V1B100boM7OS1TTM Piannirq App PkplPlgto 6chlpits\Photo 2.tloc • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 3 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I ,~- ~ +i.;~~b •.. ~~ • 17520 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.2b1.Bb21 MDSCcnsultl~p.n~t ~ a~ G:1718100kaMID51TTM %annlnp App PkplPfpto ExtIIDNbIPholo 9.tloc v , R~ ,~~ i~;• ~~~~,~, ~. E,' I \ `+ ~4 ~ • :',:.~. .., 1,. . ~\ ~ ~. ~ ~y~ .t ~ . ` y' '1 i~_ ' ! `,~. ~' ~' ~ ~ i . 1 x.51 .. VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 4 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ..~.,.r. ~..._ ,, _ s ;- ~ ,~ :... 'JZ-° K_~" • _ 17520 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 530, IRVINE, CA 92814 949.2b1.B821 MDSConsultlnp.nst Ir~w ~~ ~I. ~ ~ J ~,~ ~'~`s1~- ~:~ :~. _ _ ~J1i r~a~ G:\718100kroM7DS17TM Planning App PkplPFroto ExNbilsWhoto 4.tloc • =~`~: ~. ` .~:a ~~:d *~ r~,~. tirs2 VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 5 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA :~ U ~~ ~~_ .. • 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 330, IRVINE, CA p2614 949.2b1 .8821 tdDSCon.ultlnp.n~t G:\7181001corVMD51l"fM Plamin App R ~ Exhmitswtnto s.doc I ,~ 1' ~'•~,,;' ~, .. .:. ~. t... ,~ - ,_ _. 1~~'~b ? ~, . __ ..r ~. "~ ~ .. . _ ` • ' ~~ VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PH~T4GRAPH No. 6 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA t .=tir 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350, . IRVINE, CA 92614 949.251.8821 MDSConsultlnp.n~t 1 -~~ G: V 18100~M1DSITTM Plannlry App PkplPliolo ExNofb\Phplo 8.000 u • ~~_.y~~Y i1` ~.T3. t ~ ~ w~ ~aQr. S lp_ ~, F ~_ i ~ rte. ~, L~' r I. ,. r n .. .~'. \y. y{R.. fir.. _ x f ~' ~-~ _ VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 7 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ' ~ ~ 17320 REDHILL AVENUE. SUITE SSD, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.251.x821 MDSCon~ul4lnp,n~1 ~=~ d b c:+»ewo~conMnsrrM Plarwrq npp Pkuwrow Exlrbitswrom ~.doc • ,u.. .~ ~. ~ ,..~.s z.` ~ . c;. a*: ~ y ~~~ _.~> „~.__, ~, ~~ .~ ~y r. ~. -, .: ~,e.r. "~ e' tik ~`~ ~; ~ ~ ~ F , a r i{ ~ r x J r. p~~ 3 ~ f .~ i ~~, ~. }~ 1 f: h X~,•. ~- ~ y ~A ~.: t `'tea '' ~y i'_`~ VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 8 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA L ~ ~ o 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.251.8821 MDSCon~ulflnp.n~T ~a ~ c:vleavYArvaosrrw Planrurq Aop al~wrow ExNaawrow e.eoc C7 • a~ ~~ .. ~, y z _' M~ ., t ~,~ yR.. ~ ~, i =1a ~5 "~ i lrb'...r- - rf-' ~a4:,+ , ~,_~~ r. '" s y` ,; ~. . 7 - 1 1, f ^. r R ~~r.'Yj ~~Y '` '~ `~ t f_ ~ hr ~ , aid ~f ~.'l x~'.~ai~,, l t~ _.: ;, , _ ~a:.r ~~ ~~ f ~ r ~~ ~ VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 9 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 y ,' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA • 1 7320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE SSO. IRVINE, CA, 02614 949.261.8821 MDSCon.ultfnp.n~t ~~3a G:171810McoM1D51TTM PWnnirq App PkplPhofo ExldbttslPhoto 9.tbC VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 10 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ .,~~ • ~- R . 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350, IRVINE, CA 02614 949.2b1 .eaz~ MDSConsultlnp.n~t ~~ O:1718100~,poAMDS1TiM Plannirp App pkplPlxrio ExHOMSlplgto 10.Ooc • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 11 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1732D REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 33D, IRVINE, CA t-2614 949.251.Ba21 MDSCon•uklnp.n~t F 3a G:171 B1IXNcoMAD51TiM PlanrNrtp APD FkptPltolo ExhloNStPhoto 1 t.doc • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. ~ ~ DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 330, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.251.8421 MDSConsultinp.n~t ,1, :. ~~ .~ _l G:1778100',coAMDS1TTM PLmJrq App pkp~Pf,otc [x hiGlslPlgto 12.000 \~ • r1 U • `~ ~.~,. ~i_ .,_ ;. ~_ , VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 13 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA • 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 3a0, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.261 ,aa21 MDSConsultinp.n~t t- ~ G:17/81001cor1MD51TTM Plamirq App PkplPhoW ExNbi[slPhoto 13.Ooc . '~^ r _~ .: ., . ., ~~ b._ ~~~ w , ~ :.~ i .j VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 14 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I' y~r.., i9e _'.,, ~ .~ _ .. V _ t i err ~' 17520 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 560, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.2b1 .0>!21 MDSConsultiny.nst r ~ ~~ G:17/81005mM1D51TTM PWnnlnp App PkplPhob ExNbRSlPhoto 14.tlac • • • • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH Na.15 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ;~ ~ a- • 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 33D, IRVINE, CA R2614 949.251 .BJf21 MDSConsuklnp.nst r ~~ G:1778~001corVv1051TTM planning App Pkglphola Exh~itslphot0 15.doc VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 16 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 3550, IRVINE. CA 92614 849.251 .8821 MDSConsultlnp.nst ~`"- 3~~~ G:17/81801cor1MDS1TiM Plamilp App PkptPtgto ExddtsWlwto 18.doc • • • VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 17 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~~ • 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 350, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.261.8021 MDSCon~ulfinp.n~t r- 3 G:17181001coAMDSTTM PlanMnp App PkptPlglo Exh16HsWtptO 17.doc VICTORIA ARBORS TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1-31 PHOTOGRAPH No. 18 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY 9, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 17320 REDHILL AVENUE, SUITE 3SD, IRVINE, CA 92614 949.261.6821 MDSCon~ulflnp.n~+ ~~ c:vlewaaonn~osrnd Plannlrq o~,p Pkpwlaro ExfYdlawluM le.aoc • • City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 - CUCAMONGA 220 L.P. - A residential subdivision of 31 lots on 8.79 acres in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive-APN: 0227-171-29, 30. 2. Related Files: Master Plan Amendment DRC2007-00047 and Minor Exception DRC2007-00048 3. Description of Project: The applicant is proposing a tentative tract map to subdivide two parcels of undeveloped land totaling 8.79 acres into 31 parcels to allow for the future construction of single-family homes. The project is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive adjacent to Victoria Arbors Park. To facilitate the proposed project, the applicant is requesting an amendment of the underlying Victoria Arbors Master Plan to change the land use designations from School to Mixed Use Residential (4 to 6 units per acre). This is consistent with the General Plan designation of Mixed Use. In addition, the project involves a minor exception to increase the perimeter walls to a maximum of 7 feet 8 inches from 7 feet 8 inches in height along Lots 3 and 4 and 13 and 14. The project proposes 31 single-family detached residential lots fronting onto two proposed public local streets. At this time, no product has been submitted. The 31 proposed lots range from 5,500 square feet to 11,365 square feet in size and the average lot size is 7,700 square feet. The project will meet the requirements of the proposed district in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan if the amendment is granted. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Cucamonga 220 L. P. John Morrisette 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 Encino, CA 91436 5. General Plan Designation: Mixed Use 6. Zoning: The site is currently zoned as a school site within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and currently proposing to amend the zoning to match the surrounding area of Mixed Use Single-Family District. 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is a vacant 8.79-acre puzzle-shaped site located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive and bordered on the south and east sides by single-family homes and Victoria Arbors Park on the north and east sides (see attached aerial photo). The zoning designations for the properties surrounding the site are Mixed Use (MU) Residential. The access points to the protect will be from Victoria Park Lane on the east and Long Meadow Drive to the south. The property generally slopes from the north/northeast td the southwest and contains no significant vegetation as the site was once mass graded. The site was previously allocated for a school site and owned by the Etiwanda School District. The • school district has since sold the site to the owner and indicated that the site is no longer needed for an additional school. The 8.09-acre Victoria Arbors Park is located adjacent to the site with a proposed pedestrian access point at the south portion of the project. The 1.37-acre wetlands are F -40 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pace 2 located between the north portion of the park and the project site. The park contains a baseball field and children's play area. As with all projects in the community, the single-family residential protect will be subject to the City's Development/Design review process to ensure that the project is consistent with all applicable guidelines, standards, and ordinances. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909) 477-2750 t0. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None. GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWOCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ()Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality (/) Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils ()Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (/) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic OUtilities & Service.S stems _ OMandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Prepared By: Reviewed By: Date: ~/~ 0~ ~~ Date: ~ G d ~, - i • J • F ~41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 3 • less Than SgniOcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pmantielly swn~+l=an, With Mitigaa=n Than SiBntl¢ent No ImOa=t Incomotated Imoap Im=ad EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Have a substantial affect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () (/) () ( ) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic • Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive and is undeveloped. The site is proposed to be subdivided into 31 parcels with asingle-family residence constructed on each parcel. No specific design or placement of the residences has been submitted at this time. The lot design meet and exceed the minimum requirements for Mixed Use Single-Family (4 to 6 units per acre). As standard procedure, the project will be subject to public notice and the City's design review and approval process where the issue of size and design will be will be addressed. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Project plans (including Landscape Plans) will be modified as directed by the Design Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission before approval will be granted. As such, no specific mitigation for this issue is required. • d) The project will most likely involve the addition of new light fixtures located on the site. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans, which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination fo within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the neaps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (/) Williamson Act contract? F-42 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Pa e 4 Less Than Sgm6canl less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PolanaallY wpm Than pp g Signihcem Mitigaoon signd¢ant No Impact Incprporatatl ~ Impact Innad c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) because of their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is undeveloped and is bound on two sides by existing single-family homes and a park to the north and west of the site. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive in a fully • developed area of the City, and is characterized by single-family residences to the east and south and a park and wetlands to the north and west. The nearest agricultural use is approximately 1 mile east from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people? • F-43 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Paqe 5 • less Than Sgm6cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P01Bn1d1y Sipn,hcent ""t" MiLgaOOn '"a" Spnil¢ant Nc Impact Incorporated Impapt Impact Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on aproject-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: • 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. F ~44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Paqe 6 Less Then 9gn,hcern Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: aptannally wnn men Signd,cant Mippat,on Sign,l¢ant No nged 000~p0lateC Impact mpaC • Schedule activities to minimiie the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWoCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organize Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. C~ • • F-45 • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 7 Less Tnan SiBnilmant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Finanaally wpm Tnan pp g SiOnihcam ~ Mmgaoon 9pnihcam No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. • • c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAOMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers; and athletic facilities. According to the SCAOMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAOMD Rule 1401. The project site is located adjacent to sensitive receptors: single-family residences and Victoria Arbors Park. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () (/) ( ) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native O , O O (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? F-46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 8 Less Ttlan Sipnll,caN Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pnlanuany w"" Tnan S~gmLCant MiLpaLOn Sigmbcanl No Impact Incor ora~etl Im an I ecl t) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with single-family and recreational uses, and has been previously mass graded during construction of the surrounding improvements. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Although an existing wetlands area is adjacent to the project, it will be unaffected. The following mitigation measure has been put into place to ensure that impacts would be less-than-significant: 1) The applicant shall protect the wetlands adjacent to the site and ensure that construction debris, fill, and water do not enter the wetland site. • c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, protect implementation would have no Impact on • these resources.' d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby, disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with any local ordinance. The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () () () (/) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho • Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no Impact. F ~47 • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 City of Rancho Cucamonga Less Tpan Sigrnficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fpte^t~airo wpm man SipniLCant MiOgaAOn Sibmecent No Impact ntorpprated Impact Impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. r1 U • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000 to 100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. F ~48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Paqe 10 Less Than 9pntl¢am Lass Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pe.a^,.any wen Then pp g SipniLCanl Millgation SgmLCanl No moad Incorporated Impatl Impact Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The project site has already been disrupted by construction of the surrounding improvements. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Realth and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () () (/) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to Iite or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? • • • f ~49 • • Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTI City of Rancho Cucamonga Paoe 11 Less Than signd¢am Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptanhany Sign,LCant w,.n MRlgaucn than Sgrnhcant No Impact InrorporalaC Impact Impact Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault passes approximately 2 miles west of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 3 1/4 mile to the north. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to Mw7.5 earthquakes, is approximately 12 miles northeasterly of the eastern city limits and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeasterly from the eastern city limits. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less than significant. b) The proposed project will requue the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~g emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,g emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~g emissions. • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water frdm the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil type on-site consists of Tulunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposds. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil type on-site consists of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soll association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically considered to be moderately permeable and generally well drained. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. F-50 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Paqe 12 LB55 Thal) Spml¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fc~anhally wrm Tnan Srgni(¢ant MaigaLOn SrpnlLCenr No Impact Inrorporatetl Impen Impact 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. • • b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous • Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the F -51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 13 u Less iOan SipniLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Ppfa",tally SignJa ent w"" MlOpadon 'nan Sipnihcant N° I!(IpaC1 ncofpoletetl RgdCt Impact storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The protect site is located within 43 mile of Grapeland Elementary School. Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 8 miles north of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. • h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Ptan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. • 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: () () (/) ( ) a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site O O O (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? F ~52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 14 Lass Than Spmf,cent Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP 9 anon„anv Sipnn¢an1 wim Mu,gaeon rnan s,gnn,oant No Impan Incor oraletl Irrpad Impan e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the O O O (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood slows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (/) Comments: • a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized • to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, • the construction contractor of the protect will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction' activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by MDS Consulting (January 3, 2007), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such F-53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 15 • Less Then SiOnlLCen1 Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fplamiany Spntlicant wpm Miopaoon rnan SipniLCam No broad Incorporated Impap Impen as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: • 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on- site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing .of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post- Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by MDS Consulting (January 3, 2007) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the • Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to F -54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 16 Less Then SpnlLCant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Pplanaally Sipnihcant wnn M,I,patipn Tnan sipn,(cant No Impart Incpippratetl Impart Impart 470 feet below the ground surace. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existirg storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. \J e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit • V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. F-55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 17 • Less Tnan Sigrn6cam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fotem,auv Sigmhcant wnn Mmgaeon man Sienihcant No Impact Incoryoratetl Impact Impact h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. r 1 ~J 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? O O O (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () (/) ( ) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive and is undeveloped in a fully developed area of the City and is characterized by single-family residences to the east and south, and a park and wetlands to the north and west. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding single family development to the south and east. The project involves improvements to an existing use within the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The land use designation of the project site is for a school within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Master Plan to change the land use to Mixed Use Low-Medium Residential. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. The Etiwanda School District has indicated that this site is not required for a school site at this time. If the need should arise for a school to be built prior to the construction of the single-family residences the land use amendment will still allow for a school site to be built.- As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. • According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not located within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. F:56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Paqe 18 Less Than S,gnlLCant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PctanM1any wun Than Significant M,OgeOOn Signihcent No Impact Incoryoratetl Impact Impatl 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: I O O O (/) i a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the ~ residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments• a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no Impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. ~ 1. NOISE- Would the project result in: () (/) () ( ) a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, O O O (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • • Comments: a) The protect site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. The 13 Tots (Lots 17-29) along Victoria Park Place will need mitigation measures to comply with the City's 65 CNEL exterior noise level standard. The proposed • 6-foot masonry block wall will satisfy the acoustical requirements according to the Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve Associates on April 11, 2008. The interior noise standard of 45 CNEL will be met with use of standard windows and adequate ventilation. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce exterior and interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: F-57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Pa e 19 u Less Than SipnJ¢ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pptantially wnn rnan Sigml¢ant Mmpaoon SigniOCant No Impact pCOrppfd~atl Impact Impact 1) Exterior: Install noise barriers that consist of a wall, a berm, or a combination of the two. The noise barrier must have a surtace density of at least 3 1/2 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8-inch plate glass, 5/8-inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Masonry walls should be located at the top of the slope. 2) Interior: No upgrade of windows is required to meet the City's 45CNEL interior noise standard but to achieve the required attenuation windows need to remain closed. Therefore, adequate ventilation is required for Lots 17 through 29 by use of air conditioning units while windows are closed. b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project is intended to better accommodate the activities already present on the site and will not significantly increase traffic; hence, an increase in ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project is expected. _ d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise • exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 4) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified' in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced. in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 5) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, • the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. F ~58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 20 Lass Than S,pnlhcenl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pp+enually w,ln Than SrBnd,cem Mnrpel,on Srgnilican( No aCt nCp O+alatl fnpecl aCl e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure}? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: • a) Although the proposed project includes a subdivision of 31 units within a predominantly developed • area, it will not substantially increase population. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No impacts are anticipated. b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site does not contain any housing units nor will result in the displacement of any person. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: () () () (/) a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? () () () (/) c) Schools? () () () (/) d) Parks? () () () (/) e) Other public facilities? () () () (/) Comments: • a) The site, located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Dnve in a fully developed area of the Clty, will be served by Fire Station 173 located approximately 3/4 mile southeast from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or F-59 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than SiBn,l,cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fptanually $prnLCant wnn Mihpauon than SIBpItlLant ~ No I act Incpmoratatl I etl Impel alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. r1 ~J • b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the nature or pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not result in an increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the school districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, which is Victoria Arbors Park, is located adjacent to the site and Windrows Park is located approximately 1 mile north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or'cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new public facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has constructed a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: () () (/) ( ) a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project site is approximately 1 mile from two public parks. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. F ~60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 22 Less Than ' Sipnil,cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: pp g Pptamlatlr $Ipphpant WRh M,LgaLOp Then SipntM1Cant Np Impact Incoryoretetl moaa Impact 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: () () () (/) a) Cause an Increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an Increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards because of a design () () () (/) feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 9.59 vehicle trips daily per hours. The proposed project includes the future development of 31 single family residences. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family detached residence will generate 9.59 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. • r I• J b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence will generate 9.59 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee • prior to issuance of building permits. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. F ~61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 23 r~ • Lass rnan - Sipntlicam Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources: PP g I=me"tiauy Signdicpnt w"" Mnigehpn '"a° Sipnlhtent No Ipp0C1 OCp prBiBd ad TpaCt c) Located approximately 5.2 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is entirely developed. The project will be required to provide any street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site as required by the City Engineer. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project () () () (/) a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O O O (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: • a) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. f -62 Initial Study for TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 City of Rancho Cucamonga Pape 24 Less Then Spntlicenf Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fptannaoy S,pnihcan, wnh Mnipanpn rnan &prnhcem No ImpaC~ IOWmpf8~e0 I11`paCl IrtgaC~ b) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVW D sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE () () () (/) a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? - b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the protect have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. developed. Based on previous development endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. biological resources as identified on the City of Additionally, the area surrounding the site is and street improvements, it is unlikely that any • • F-63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 25 • Less Than $iQ010cant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: PP g Fplamianv Sigmhcant wpm MLLigarion rnan SignNCant No Impact Inwrporaretl Impact IrrPad b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)), These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at • less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Victoria Planned Community EIR (Certified May 20, 1981) (/) Victoria Arbors Master Plan EIR (Certified July 7, 1999) (/) Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract Map 18449 • (Report #OB-42'Certified April 11, 2008) F -64 Initial.Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 Page 26 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature: (~'Q.C~ .~'~-~w Date: b I S/O p Print Name and Title: Jack Shine, Chairman u • ~J F-65 ~J NOISE ANALYSIS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 18449 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Report #08-42 April 11, 2008 ~l1Cp~lONGA Prepared For: ~~"(y 4F ~ANG~d American Beauty Development • ApR 1 6 2~~i3 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401 RECEIVED - ~'" `' "~~~~ Enci°°' CA 91436 Prepared By: Fred Greve, P.E. Bill Vasquez Mestre Greve Associates 27812 EI Lazo Road Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 Phone (949)349-0671 FAX (949) 349-0679 C~ F-66 Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Page 2 of 9 SUMMARY EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS FOR TRACT 18449 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXTERIOR NOISE MITIGATION The exterior living areas in the project must comply with the City's 65 CNEL exterior noise standard. For the exterior living areas that are exposed to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL, some form of noise mitigation'is required. An effective method of reducing the traffic noise to acceptable levels is with a noise barrier. The results of the analysis indicate that the noise level will be 65 CNEL and therefore, noise barriers will be required along Victoria Park Lane. The required noise barrier locations and heights to exceed the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard are listed below in Table S 1 and shown in Exhibit S 1. The current plans show a 6-foot masonry block wall along Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadows Drive which will satisfy the acoustical requirements. Table S1 REQUIRED FIRST FLOOR EXTERIOR LIVING AREA NOISE BARRIER HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS LOCATION BARRIER HEIGHT (FI') Along Victoria Park Lane Lots 17 through 20 3.0' Lots 20 through 25 5.0' The noise barriers may consist of a wall, a berm, or a combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8-inch plate glass, 5/8-inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 65 CNEL outdoor noise standard with the noise barriers listed above in Table 4. The walls shall be located at top of slope as shown in Exhibit S L , • • • F-67 `, ~, ~t Ev ~+ + D 1 LC E).NIYYi SS Wii'A'01f- ~~~~~ fY6 ',:?;:RS 't ~/ // i ~v ', :ll `. E9 ., Q~ ~~ ~ ~~ C T r . ',a .«. ~ y . u 'W ' Q~.n '. ~~ :XSfINC ~ ~ tP ~ nI~A ... ~ 1 ~ ~• ~ ~ ~,.~,,,y c~ ~ ci Requires 3.U' Noise Barrier ",f .' ~~ ~i/..., . /~ Requires 5.0' Noise Ranier ~~ ~ , E '~ '~ CELLAR CWRf ' C^a 9 LU ', Y' -~.. C? . ~ ~ 1_ ~ ct x r ~ t1 ~ I~ ` ~ ~ ~i~ f \ I~ ~ .~ _ \ I' \\i s ki .. ' . Y W .. ~'~ ~ F7Friln;Nll:~ i _ p , G~ y O .I r~ ~ { 4 ~ ~ ~ " a a ; . .. i.. 4 ~ - :r~ ~w ^ ' .' LONG - McADpyy ' ~~ u w ` TAI:CTDC l:DCVC ACCII!`TATCC Barrier Locations Exhibit S1 -First Floor Noise Barriers Required In ~ s°sr '?'o Meet.Exterior Noise Standard Mestre Greve Associates Report #Og-42 Page 3 of 9 • INTERIOR NOISE Second floor building surfaces along Victoria Park Lane will be exposed to a maximum noise level of 64.9 CNEL, and therefore will require at least 19.9 dB exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard. All homes alone Victoria Park Lane will meet the 45 CNEL interior standards without window uporudes ADEQUATE VENTILATION Since the noise attenuation of a building falls to about 12 dB with windows open, all buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. In order to assume that windows can remain closed to achieve this required attenuation, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per the applicable Uniform Building Code. Adequate ventilation will be required for those homes listed in Table S2 and shown in Exhibit 52. The acceptability of using air conditioners to meet adequate ventilation requirement varies by municipality. The local jurisdiction and the mechanical engineer for the project should be consulted. Table S2 • VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS BUILDING Alono Victoria Park Lane Homes on Lots 17 through Lot 29 • F -69 ~«,~f " u w ,. ~ TR Cc'"f N!~ H57~ -rSIC.~Pffl•^,~l DgryE y W ~~.. ~~ 'i FIAC"f hc. kiai7 ® Buildings Requiring Adequate Ventilation Exhibit S2 -Ventilation Requirements F-~o MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Page 4 of 9 NOISE ANALYSIS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT~18449 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1.0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to demonstrate compliance of Tentative Tract 18449 with the noise related `Conditions of Approval' placed on the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project calls for the development of single-family homes. The project is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as shown in Exhibit 1. The project will be impacted by traffic noise from Victoria Park Lane. This report specifies any mitigation measures necessary to meet the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard and the 45 CNEL interior noise standard. Site plan and grading information was obtained from the plans for "Tentative Tract 18449 Residential Lots 1-31" by MDS Consulting, February 20, 2008. 2.0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS The City of Rancho Cucamonga specifies outdoor and indoor noise ]imits for residential land uses. Both standards are based upon the CNEL index. CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) is a 24-hour time weighted annual average noise level based on the A-weighted decibel. A-weighting is a frequency correction that correlates overall sound pressure levels with the frequency response of the human ear. Time weighting refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain noise-sensitive time periods is given more significance because it occurs at these times. In the calculation of CNEL, noise occurring in the evening time period (7 p.m. to 10 p. m.) is weighted by 5 dB, while noise occurring in the nighttime period (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) is weighted by 10 dB. These time periods and weighting factors are used to reflect increased sensitivity to noise while sleeping, eating, and relaxing. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted an exterior noise standard of 65 CNEL. In addition, the City has decided upon an interior noise standard of 45 CNEL. • • F ~71 BASELINE RD. ~ m' Longg Meatlav~u Onve F C Y CHURCH ¢w ST. FOOTHILL BLVD. °~ ARROW RT. Q Q Q z ,~, Q z ° Z w = Q J ~' _ ~ ~ 4TH ST. 1 v~ciNmr ~aP NOT TO SCALE Exhibit 1 -Vicinity Map PROJECT SITE I F-72 MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Page 5 of 9 • 3.0 METHODOLOGY The traffic noise levels projected in this report were computed using the Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FHWA-RD-77-]08,.December 1978). The FHWA Model uses traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry to compute the "equivalent noise level". A computer code has been written which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time periods used in CNEL. Weighting these noise levels and summing them results in the CNEL for the traffic projections used. Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier (wall, bean, or combination walllberm) is the most common way of alleviating traffic noise impacts. The effect of a noise barrier is critically dependent- upon the geometry between the noise source, the barrier, and the observer. A noise barrier effect occurs when the "line of sight" between the noise source and the observer is interrupted by the barrier. As the distance that the noise must travel around the noise barrier increases, the amount of noise reduction increases. 4.0 NOISE EXPOSURE The existing traffic volume for Victoria Park Lane was obtained from Mr. Jon Gillespie at the Rancho Cucamonga traffic-engineering department on March 6, 2008. A future traffic forecast was not available from the City. The future (year-2028) traffic volume for Victoria Park.Lane was calculated using a 2% per year growth factor. Long Meadow Drive is considered a local collector and will not affect the living units. The traffic volume, vehicle speed, and roadway grade used in the CNEL calculations are presented below in Table I. Table 1 FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUME, SPEED AND ROADWAY GRADE ROADWAY TRAFFIC VOLUME Victoria Park Lane 11.888 SPEED GRADE 45 <3% The traffic distribution that was used in the CNEL calculations is listed below in Table 2. This arterial traffic distribution estimate was compiled by the Orange County Environmental Management Agency, and is based on traffic counts at 31 intersections throughout the Orange County area. Arterial traffic distribution estimates can be considered typical for arterials in Southern California. • • F-73 Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Page 6 of 9 • Table 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION PER TIME OF DAY IN PERCENT OF ADT VEHICLE TYPE DAY EVENING NIGHT Victoria Park Lane Automobile 75.51 12.57 9.34 Medium Truck 1.56 0.09 0.19 Heavy Truck 0.64 0.02 0.08 Using the assumption presented above, the future noise levels were computed. The results are listed in Table 3 in terms of distances to the 60, 65, and 70 CNEL contours. These represent the distances from the centerline of each roadway to the contour value shown. Note that the values given in Table 3 do not take into account the effect of intervening topography that may affect the roadway noise exposure. • Table 3 DISTANCE TO NOISE CONTOURS FOR FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DISTANCE TO CONTOUR (FT) ROADWAY -70 CNEL- -65 CNEL- -60 CNEL- Victoria Park Lane 33 71 154 * -Contour distances in this table are based on the centerline of the roadway representing the noise source. The results in Table 3 and the site plan (Exhibit Z) indicate that first floor exterior observers along Victoria Park Lane would be exposed to a maximum unmitigated traffic noise level of 64.9 CNEL. u F-~a ; i• '~ 9. 1 ah.51 UW ~ `~ I ~~ 6~ r~~~ = 0 - ~ _ ~. ~ ^ nn S ~ ~ G ~~ ~ _ tip .l l!^_+9 .... LONG M@~C _ W '..... OAn'E U W, ~ 'fii.A.~T k: ?1073 Y W ~- r ~ 5 ~ ._rnn, i -c~l ~a _ , o m' .FW'7 fs;. 1;5'2 i:;irv~_,::, :.n,., aa~gr~r~Tl,^~.) • • Exhibit 2 -Site Plan MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES 75 oar 7l ~~~ ~~ l ' CELLAP COURT ~1E i~ v, ;~ ~~ , j ' ., +, Mestre Greve Associates Report ~t08-42 Page 7 of 9 • 5.(1 EX'CEI2IOR NOISE MITIGATION The exterior living areas in the project must comply with the City's 65 CNEL exterior noise standard. For the exterior living areas that are exposed to noise levels greater than 65 CNEL, some form of noise mitigation is required. An effective method of reducing the u~affic noise to acceptable levels is with a noise barrier. The results of the analysis indicate that the noise level will he 65 CNEL and therefore, noise barriers will be required along Victoria Park Lane. The required noise barrier locations and heights to exceed the 65 CNEL exterior noise standard are listed below in Table 4 and shown in Exhibit 3. The current plans show a 6-foot masonry block wall along Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadows Drive which will satisfy the acoustical requirements. Table 4 REQUIRED FIRST FLOOR EXTERIOR LIVING AREA NOISE BARRIER HEIGHTS AND LOCATIONS LOCATION BARRIER HEIGHT (FI') • Alono-Victoria Park Lane Lots 17 through 20 3.0' Lots 20 through 25 5.0' The noise barriers may consist of a wall, a berm, or a combination of the two. The noise barriers must have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot, and shall have no openings or gaps. The wall may be constructed of stud and stucco, 3/8-inch plate glass, 5/8-inch plexiglass, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. The first floor exterior living areas are projected to meet the 6~ CNEL outdoor noise standard with the noise barriers listed above in Table 4. The walls shall be located at top of slope. 6.0 INTERIOR NOSE The project must comply with the indoor noise standard of 45 CNEL. To meet the interior noise standard, the buildings must provide sufficient outdoor to indoor building attenuation to reduce the noise to acceptable levels. The outdoor to indoor noise reduction characteristics of a building are determined by combining the transmission loss of each of the building elements that make up • the building. Each unique building element has a characteristic transmission loss. F ~76 i• / ~ 'J ,. t '.`{, Requires 3.0' Noise Barrier ' ~ ~t "~ -. ,.- :~ ~~ Via ~ i ~ ~ , ,; ; ~ ao , ~ ` c ' ` "' _~ ` , Requires 5.0' Noise Barrier f1sn+G is waaort ~f?~to ~ k1 EXh7YY• _ ~ We n_Atll)5 ', m . ~ ~ ~~ . ~ i ., - v Wn a~cA wM ":. ` ~ ~, p CEUJ~R al~r ' ~.a wu ., 1 _.„ ' `' ~ ~ CS r 1 ... .~ '~ PEPAETFR L ' -__ ( " F ~ a~ .-c Requires 5.0' Noise Barrier „ _ _ _ .._ __ p •, _ur,rsr `~' , , ci ~ s •,. ,_„ o ~ 3 _ ~ ° a iI " is _ - "-_ ~:- I - _ ,.... pp , .,e '~ ' ~i ' ~ .., it \ ~ .. % i a ~ '~ A t f Gl~~ r ~ ~iJ ~ F \ .~ \t\1 I - , ,_ ~¢t ~ lL^~ ~ ~ ' - LONG - ~ .MEADO -_ . '~ -• ~I~' ., ; W ~ -. ... .~ _ D~~ .. - U .- y in :_~issrrna, } 3 ~ w ~a. HcrblrlctSllM.) p Barrier Locations MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Exhibit 3 -First Floor Noise Barriers Required In ~r~;,r Tn Meet Exterior Noise Standard • • Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Page 8 of 9 • For residential units, the critical building elements are the roof, walls, windows, doors, attic configuration and insulation. The total noise reduction achieved is dependent upon the transmission loss of each element, and the surface area of that element in relation to the total swface area of the room. Room absorption is the final factor used in determining the total noise reduction. Second floor building surfaces along Victoria Park Lane will be exposed to a maximum noise level of 64.9 CNEL, and therefore will require at least 19.9 d6 exterior to interior noise reduction in order to meet the City's 45 CNEL interior noise standard. All homes along Victoria P'trl< Lane will meet the 45 CNEL interior standards without window upgrades. 7.0 ADEQUATE VENTILATION Since the noise attenuation of a building falls to about 12 dB with windows open, all buildings exposed to noise levels greater than 57 CNEL will meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard only with windows closed. in order to assume that windows can remain closed to achieve this required attenuation, adequate ventilation with windows closed must be provided per the applicable Uniform Building Code. Adequate ventilation will be required for those homes listed in Table 5 and shown in Exhibit 4. • The acceptability of using air conditioners to meet adequate ventilation requirement varies by municipality. The local jurisdiction and the mechanical engineer for the project should be consulted. Table 5 VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS BUILDING Along Victoria Park Lane Homes on Lots 17 through Lot 29 U F -78 .. exan~c ss x~.nrt- ~`~ ~ f ~gwu~1 Two , _~s rare ror~ro; n,i:.:.as ~~t I~ LONG u w M~DCW 7;in::7 ki k373~ :_d:chfR:1_% DRIVE ! ~. 9 t, ~ "(ice ~' O ~. _'~ Fr . 0 ~- •f' ~ '~ `~ ';,- ` ~ st '~' " ~; " „ ~ ~ V ~ : ~ '. •_ ~ .; .q ~ . ~ ~ CELLAP COURT - ~ ` ~ , ,ENE , ~ '~' - ,a~ ~ , ~`: 'I i. ` ~ • - I - ~ i. ~ v ~• n (i _ _ .. _ II ~ { m \\ i Y W .. ' _ ~ ~ .. .'i FlA~;-f r<n 163?7 g , ~~a ~ ~ Fi,v~~12f~7I,',,.) -. O Buildings Requiring Adequate Ventilation Exhibit 4 -Ventilation Requirements F -79 • • MESTRE GREVE ASSOCIATES Mestre Greve Associates Report #08-42 Pabe 9 of 9 • APPENDIX CALCULATION SPREADSHEETS DATA USED TO DETERMINE EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS u • F -80 v L ? y ~ G v Z Q L y C C 2 a7 z G 1 ~ C y J Z U L ~i T P 0 a s° o ~ c - ~ o° ll ~ O Q ~~ 6 z ry Y a ~ ~ _J` A s - C O ~ LL K z i a 9 9 o H ~ u U o o o o`n E°- = $d'~~~:~~3~aa~~{x = wr r -- Z I(~~ V'. P V b b~~ b ~D b ,D b~ U S ~~~ S ~ Y~ ~ Y 3 2 '~' 1' Y // bin fmG po~.~. .p .-pbr yy ~n-w rv ~ ~ ~ D ~ b b D b ~ b bb b dd b o p p "' - 9 b Ww O y Z V ' 99 ~ ~ y ry w G ` 9 n C u Q ~ o'' _ a v u N ~ Y > :J Z >` 9 i F -81 ~~.~~ ~j~~ ~~~~ ~~'~~ ~~~~~ O Z ~...i O C. V ,p y O V L p G P y .b = 1! a ,~ V ~!~ L .~ li U% w. L P V P ~ P N 0:.-O P ~p P D P b S a a ~~ a ai ~ as a as ~ as . H O Y O O C O O O O O O O O O C O C O O O S O~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O J 0 0 0 O O °t- '~L o.-;wo O oDOO o000 0000 0000 hVC 0000 OV•OC OOCC 0000 m O b O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D O D O Oh~r,O O~r,00 OV,00 OV,00 O~f,00 a a ~ a z 0 ' 00 .• oo ~ oo v o~.y ono 3 o~i~ oA c o~i j ova o>t x ~ q c c c 0 0 0 ` O _ o u) b ~ j n n n b I W u :~ ni: n nn n is :~ .n i:n n ni: ~ c° ° t - ~_ Y ^ P 4 7. 1~ nro n y ~ 1 A J I~ n n n -,~ 0 , b `C ~C b n rv C b b b h h •C b ~ H 9 O_ % "1 •f.` b P O Y ~ Y n n 5 rv u! O __ o~ c c o ~ o _ r? o ? c o y - J o.• - j d ". 0 2 s 'a -o ~ ~ N N N • i J - J ;a • )j J i I L P T ~ Q G z Z s i L a it 1 '[ F N `1 y C LL: V • N Tp N O d 00 O F ~ _O ~ rl C ~ 7 m i ~.` ~ Eu; ~ Q 1' ' O . f~- '~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 x ~ 'T X J y '1 O P n ~_ ~~ P fA r ~O i~~ T ~. M rv Z v.~ °;v .o ~~da ~o arc ~~ °r :J x' $ ~ ~ ~{ 8 Q 1 'E ~ Y Y '8' 7' ~~~ " 0 b W O, r. h- b t~ r~ ~r. - W n r b d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b n ~ O ir, O ir, O ir, O~ p O P~ 0 C', K, T [t ~f~ Sri BOO AA PP i -i 9_ S_ Z - , 9 v ~ ¢ C ~ V fh ~ ~ y Z C ~ L F. V $ L F-82 T i 3 C Ll O h ~ J J: Z V - O ~ = ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E ~~ ~ ~ rl u . - Z ~ E _ E _ E _ - c _ ~D ~ r m P V r~ r b - V -~ T T ~ ~ P ~ r ~ n N Y. P P ~L T .C ~ ,p ~ y ~ , V' q ~ ' oooc 0000 coon GoOO Gcco ,2 0000 loco 060c 0060 Deco O O O c O O O C O O G O O O O O O O O O C 5~ 6 O c o O c O O o c O O O C O O O C c o C Z '~ coo0 0000 000o OGOO ooGo < 0~noc ov,» ov;0o 0000 0000 ~ 4 o ~ s a O o ~ O b .. G N .. O O :. O O .. 3' o-: o>a oea ooh 0o 'a x a ~ ~ _ O O C .- C O C O ` ~ 0 ~ . N LL ~ ~ ~ A~ x Y K 1\I\ O OC ~ `~ Q O y % b ~ . Q~ R~ O ? O h N N ^1 ~ ~ ., n 5 ~~ ~^ n •~ o ~ ~ r D % r ~ o b `O C b . - ~ C F C y nl ~ n _ _ ~ ~ ] = ~ , L ~ J ~ _ _ ~ ^ h ~ ~ i N t n _D S ~. _~ JJ ~a U_ U ~ J 0 = 5 N v ~I if L C 'L a O C Z 9 Z 1 = E N x u. J y Z V i=1 a O N c m o o U N o O u = N G Y a m ~ ~ _ ~ u_ ~ E ~ a w K<~~ P 6~ `a . .= CS _ C Z P O O k u0 _ C EY to P° O h- u ti ~ o ~ G : ^' d o N - N B~ ~? ~? ! ,~. ~ 3 - ~ . ~ - o - ~ ', a,- O F T p R1 T a a Z ~ ~9 ..dv¢y ~ U N O O 5 j ~ Z ~ ' a ~ N u N N CI ___ P W n ~O VN'. Y O. 1~'1 O p ~~pp pp~~ Z f V. Y. V Y) d ~D ~~.. V Y~ d ~O aV' ~ U LL U ~ ~ c S ~ rt d ~ ~ 3 ~ '3 ~ Y Y 3' 1' - ~ ~c .0 w c.~. r-~0 r rl r; -m rv ~$~~G~~3~33~~;6G ~ Q ~h~7g~~3~~°~P8o ~+ N. F'83 - ~''~~ ~~~~ ~3~~ 33'3 3~~3 O L ti o c_~a °a o~n.o om .c °a ` ~-y°.o cn a,o N 1 L " q% ~: L P ~: ~ _ O ~ j r~ -_ Ifs y ~ ~ a ~ e '°a !1 o ~°a N . I a ~~ N VI v; ~' , d b a - OaOC oa00 orvoo oooc o-co o~r,c 0 0~.0o d~0dd o~00c o~coo 0rc o o~noo orvoo 0000 orvoo ~L 000 Ob00 O~DOO Or00 OHO OC 0] ° 0000 00.00 0- 0 0 O N O O O a 0 0 < 0roo o~boo or co oroo oeo~ _ L ~ L .D O ' 00 t+ 00 (~ 00 L 00 :. p0 L ~~ = o~ea o~ea o~ea ore ~ ono ' ^ o o 0 0 0 o c c c C~ N ^r ~ =h h =N N ^~^ „ 'h O p b b, N ^l '~° :' n n is ~ I ^ ~ 1 a° u ~ bC N ~T P' P ~ O bb Qp h T .^ ^ ~ I Q_ p T P b p p N ^~ ~3 N ~ n h N N .N m n N m .. ^ ~ ^ ^ -° '~ n n ~ .oa a `a' ti - ~ `~ o '~ C F- 90 ,~ r p n ~ ^ A h b ^ 5 v ^ ^ N ^ y ^ L _ _ J > •~ ~ J - _ - a ~ ~ a ^~ Q b N. oc N N N N N • 0 i N . b ~ J • ja ~ u oy • _` >: ~, ~i f (`, O t Z~ 0 z a u w o `1 y i Z U d a L N 7 L^ aq 7 C U o° 0 C N Q - `° m P ~ tC z O ^ Ea~i ~ Q C LL _ m a Y g _ _ O u C _ CL I7 V ` ~] C 9 9 T Z v U >.a v ¢ z p ~ N 9 h 9 7 c° ~ v z s J ~ v 5 9 O ~ r P~ r ~O V. Y ~. h P~ N l/i N - z GS,~;e~e'~a;~~~~~° ' u W U . ~ o .`~ u` o o_ ~" 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~S ~ ~ `1' C y 'D ~O D] O f~~ r - iD ~ ~~. ~~~ - GG N °~~~~~~~aa~~~~ ~ O ~V,o~ B,~:gv,~o~~g~ r. r, Yd 'dr a -i 00 0 w a Y9 N lC ~( V, V. F-84 ~ - YY ~a ~ ~' }} ~1~7 ~{ 77 3~k '3~ }}77 t{q4 3 3 77 vq 8i~~ h ° z e = - "_ - " - - - - ~ - ~., c=~v _ cotes owy °o c.e ,p 9° on~~° VI Vi O V ~: p ~! ~'. p p` a~ p• ~ P P O a ~a P . a as . P ~ as P a as P a ~a 0~~00 OPOO Ot`i00 0000 Or 0'..J O_OO OO OC~O 0000 O'f.OO 00 ~~.00 o t°wo or°oo oRoo 0000 or,oo V L O ~' Y OO O. OO OO O ~ 0 0 O ~D O OO CEO O OO m 0000 0-00 0K'oo oroo omoo ¢' o?~r,o 0^_'00 0000 oboo 0~0 00 -- c ~ ~ s s ooJ ~ oo:. oo~ oo~ oo~ _ oe o~o~ o~d3 a 0~0~ ore 0 0 o c O C O C ~ yL v. .h h ^'.1 ~ hN ~ ~'N ..~ `.h ` O = 0 ' o b c ^i ~ a' " "„ ~ n ~~ n r n° ~ v 00 r Q - C ~ ~~1 `C b C ~ '~ n~ n i U W O. •`I ^ O b ry ~ b § N 9 .,. n n n n n n t. n n n 0 b b r b b b b b o e p F- a o n r b b o °o A ~ x n n 5 . ~ ~ i ~ LL ~ L . ~_ .. ~ _ ~ C { ~_ J S . _ ~ ~ +1 ~ j ~ n = O 1 N N N N m m s '~ J za U y U m "~~ • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18449 Public Review Period Closes: August 27, 2008 Project Name: Project Applicant: CUCAMONGA 220 L.P. Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northwest corner of Victoria Park Lane and Long Meadow Drive-APN: 0227-171-29 and 30. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A residential subdivision of 31 lots on 8.79 acres in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. Related files: Master Plan Amendment DRC2007-00047 and Minor Exception DRC2007-00048. . FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. August 27, 2008 • Date of Determination Adopted By F-85 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18449 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration) for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program: Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses. including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific F-86 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM SUBTT18449 August 27, 2008 • Page 2 mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure • attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee.) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. • F-87 • Mr I.L a r 0 L~ r N J a Z H •Y U W 2 U Z_ O H Cz G Z a • Y 3 R U_ Q ~~. Q R a o d R T Y C Fes- ~ R Q. d O '- z a ~ T a LL U N ~ R O ~_ a` __ S ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ (~ N N N N N wAW 1 iN ~ ~f ' x~ ~?tS~ '~' a a a a a U 4 C C C C C C ro ro ro ro ro N o. a n a a H 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~, ~ 3 ~ ~ m m 3 ~ a i i a a i a i CC 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ' ~~, • ~ U U U m U U m 'O O - 'O N C ro C C ~ 4J w Z7 ~ L d C "O O y ro U C ~ >. O- ~ 41 ~ O N ~ Q- N . O O ro 0 .. U U >~ ~ .U ro U d ~ 'O ~ L N N L O N ~ C N N J ti a~ a y a C m U ._ ~ U ~ o L t0 (! G C U C` N~ LT N ( 9 y 0 L~ C N N~ L ro ~ C CO ~ J m~ > c m o_ a o ro o R o d d E a° v # E ~-nNro -aco o ~y~ U E¢~ o m , s'4 `°EE c moJ roo yN O U~ t o>. Y ~- - O y m U L ro > ` L ~ O C E O~ C r°y ~ L O' - C .. p C ~ HJ O N J ~ .U , ro to N C O ~ O ~ d , N ~ ~ O. w ~ ~ ~ L ~~ h CO ~ ~ ro U .O C L Q1 O ~ N d O N U y d U O y~ y > ro ' ~ ~ aci ro ro o_.`~EN> oUm y ?E ='o L.+ U <n 0 ~ mc- x m~ c¢ o '> U3 ~ ~~ '~~ E , fn co c w "= - U m y .. m : -a J o >~ _ ~ w= y o ° ° -o c m o_ ~ o c U m ~ E ~ E a o c ~ ~ m ~ ~ ° `m ~ m m¢ 'ri ~ m ~ 0- o .4 0 o.ao ° ~ o m~ J o a oo. U- o ~-° ~ = o v~ ~ voa "~ oQ o o-v .5 om 0~- ~,r~s. • o ~ L J o m ~~ _o ro ~' ._ Q c a m :.. 3 E~ °1 3 -o P' #~ C C~ O' y ro ~- N iq -_ C L a C N ro O ro - C~ ~ N N O OU C V C N L ~ J ~ ro E C ro V O N L~ ~ t6 O '- U1 ` o-o c o L y a ~ y o w r c-a E N U `N m a L m ;3 in ~ c c U c ~ ~ m o o aci ~ aci ro ° d~ m c ro~ J ' ro~ c 7 = y m :; ~ c °-2'moE N ~ _ o~ Ec a E°' h mJO~.S ~ ro c mENO a o Q, a c o ~° Y~ w o v i w c c~ N '- C ' ' C a~ o ~> C o . J O o_ .= N C ro C C J C L ~ ro d o~ U- ~ - m L -; - ~q ~ nEo 0 oa~ o-> o-> omm<a -m~aa> -o -mo o ¢F. Win, ¢ o o v E ~ U 0. 'o 'o a~ o N .E U E ~ a ¢ o_ ~ r ¢ c Q CC .S 0 F~88 ~-- ' a a a ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a s a Q a Q a Q ~ a s t/1 C fn C N C y C N C y C ro a N s ` ro a ro a o ' o ' ~ o o ro a ro a o 0 0 0 ~ ~ v v ~~ `0 0 3 3 ~ ~ w2 m2 mY m2 m2 3 3 O O O O C y C y C N C y C y O N N N N O 7 p 7 p 7 0 7 ~ 7 ~ N N CL Q Q ~ O U D U ^ U D U O U CC CC U' U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m N C_a aU Of O -L N~~ y " a>~C ~ aCO ~ ~ C N ro - pj Na C 7 O L~ N 7 ro O ~L O L ~ Vl O ~ O U U LL- .~ O a O 7 0 (U to _ ro N a U O Q~ 0~ O` O ~ C N Oc `ro 7E._ ro a ° ° c °-'a ~ E o~U a ~ °'U~ °~ U v, ~ m a~ ° t° ° L '°- Lio ro 7roN-= rm ro°r ~u~¢ o >5 ~~ '~c ~ U N y .~ a C N W N O O C O O) C C~ O G L. 3 >.-O~ >. `. O L U L O L N~ -_ ro O ro L ~ O. N N ro O j U L O U ~ N N 7 L L t9 a C N N a .E °> m . ~ ro ' L C ao -7 °' 0 m ~ a O - ~ ~ a 7 c 0 oa ~ ~ c ~ o N ~ o EE a Sa ~ ° >-m om am >. ~C C 7 x a~a m °a E N c E Lro U ~ _oo0 7 0 mE `o~E 0 o " °o n °.o ~, c 7m in °~o- vro ° m°o 1 `°am > ~ o°~ `~c7 m ° > a d n '-'N g m ~~vi aov a~~a °m°a ~cd oma ' a Ear a~mU° g 'va~0 o" am~ rom i c a °a- ~ a ~ a i itl ~ N L U - O ~' ° O) U V 7 > E O N C t6 .U Q o a c .N ro C O C d O) O ~ C O > > ro N N C x N tiJ D O 7 U ;p y °~ 7 y ro N C G a a ao mx~ ° oo°~ ~.T°'>,c N N O m~~ Emoroi ro d~~ ~'-EE 4a ~C7.__~ ro o Ol N 'O C` y U L E =- a O O ro V E y 01 c0 .C 3 O L ~ o U j ? C >s O 0 `~ 7 O d O ~ -O N d ~ Ol .7. C d r C` N N~ LL N N t/1 ` '~ O in O h O > O roro O O Y O_O'C O~~CW °-a ~Q C-c4 .~9roUC ro mLd U C > O U N m L m L ° o-o '? ~ °~ 3 > o E o ~ cU t° m~ ~n m e 7a U" a~ o ro U7 ~ ~ ~ arc cnm3 o mm , cn~~t=° cn~cn FLU, N° ~`o EO~~ °C NY e N- O) L' N` U ~ ~ N N L> O a U ~ ~ O L~ O C L O O U > F t~ ro ~ ~- f4 F s O N u ~` ~~., ` ~~ ~:v 4 f V' ?}tM y^~y',n C i=~~ ~: O ~' ~f '3k u V V 7 V g >~;';se k ~',~f ~'.~. Yt ~s ? =N,Y ;~y :~ ~ ~m' . ~ ~ e. .~' ~ i i ;~~s } ~ . ~ Y ~ t - i ~11 F^'~1 1~7A wt U U ~ ~` ~ rt~~~~~ ~a' a a a s N C' ~ N i~~~i~ C ~~ ~ ,, ~ N C m ~{ l~~l G'Y N'.4' ,' i 'C O n ~ O n " O n ~ O n a n d '~~.~n ' 'yJ N N N d `o o ''~ ~ o "-t `o `o `0 0 3 3 ~'~ 3 ~ 3 3 3 3 m ~ - ~ - ~ d m m ro W CL ~- Q ~ , W W ¢ W . `~t ~7 ~~ ~ ^ O x~~dy+ ^ ~. U U ~~ U o- ~ ,~ U U U U G$'',~+ ~a E , ~~ . ' O O O O , v ~I m m m m O O ~~~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ m . m ~~ ~ ~ ~ d ro m` m a ~ a~ ~ a~ = c m O O ~o C~ O a~ ; m v+ a ~ m Q L'C ~ ~G ~ ~ t6 L~'~W t6 ~ " Y ro ~ . .- N ~ L .~ O N C tp ~ ~ N ACS - ~ -~ O iLdi ' `~i3t U U..-. .. o ° - ~ c ° `~ ro Q ro p~- W ~ U t o ~ L N n = N .,;,~~; ~ x N 4~~~~ ~ C ~ ~;~ . E ~ N N O O p~ 3 U - ' ~~"- L ~ c ~ E a ~ ~ a U R ~"~qi'F . N c d U N . N p~ _ _ ° y~ ~ = ' ro ~ ~'" o E ~ °1 m° ro m ?u a _ o U o roc m c ro a ~ ~ O 6 U C C U N ~}a ~ N N ' i~q ~ ~~ ' ~ O N N lp C U (CO T C~ N m O N ~ ro d ro m c n ` N ro C t6 i"" O C ~ A f ~ ro U ] O) O ~ U ;~ O ' U ~ ~ t6 U N~ N , , ul Q '" '! ~ -O ~ ~N N O ~ U C E N U U O C N ro N ' N C ` O) N U , :^R' m O C . - Y m'O O N O n m o > O .U n U O N~ C_ E m~ c . ~ m E -~ ~ ~ ° ~- °' . o ro Ess '" ° o mi o N= o-o ~ ~ N. E 3 ~.- o ` m.~ oLn s +y ° m`m ~~ o ~~~ ,~~:: ~:?~'t., n o ~m'm~~m No° omr n ro m° -o E °- E ~ ~~~ ~ -a ~'~ L C O . ¢ E T m ro - a~ ai E ^- ~ ._ E~ m ~ E ~.~~ ~~ c ~: v~ o a ~,.~ ~ o -- c m ~~ ~ ro vi O t4 Ol 0 0 ,ir# '4 ~ CO <p O ~ ~ ii ~ ro -O 0 0` ~ O t0 O N .- C N ro Y J L C ti ro . C ,,. ~- C> U N O .- U C p. c U td '• F~~~m i, w;, o r - U O a ~ , „ 'b>i ~ _a ';.4:~: n ~ OL ~mNU U O N N EEo> N O ~ °a ~ C O s ` O C mnn o~~ aa e o.~ o . e a <eov R ro m , m1E r o °' ~ m . °-'ro N ~ ro U ; ro O O) ~:O ~ ~ , " ' o 0 0 °'-° ~ aro E 'O O ~ `° ai ° N ~ C~ C .C ~~+0€ m N r, ;=~i N QI N~ '~ O O H O "O .~ O E O C O ` C S d '. N. CC^ C O C N C ~vN.i dSc O 'O N N N~~~ O) C 0 N - R E O O _ ~ C O O C O ro ° A , y ' • U O . a~ ii ~ f ~' ~ O .~ j 0 O O °- ? N O N i o .° - m .m a~ . m {:c± Q -o o x g m ro ui ro - ° > ~ ro N o t ro ~ m E c o ,~ s o_-o U r ~ N o N .. C , N ro N .C '~O); n ro C C 4 ii ~_ -' o >. C O - O o d C _. _ U ~ O U Z O ~` _ E O~ 0 0 O N ~i O ro U1 ro N 0 ~_•~„~~; ~ R7 O~> N L W N >i ro U .C a L d ro W U O n m -~ N ~ - ma y y.0, :m= L O 0 '~ s`~A C9 = C~ U N O am . r , Q 3 H ~ , ~ =o m ~,Krk,. O M F -90 .~ a ' ° a a a a o 0 r O r O ~ o r 0 ~ o r p a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U m m [0 ~ D • ° ~ ~ d a m a o~ ~~c c ror°°n''°io o~ ~t '° =° md °~t ~ o0o omb a i c a i L m ' ~ o a c ~ aoUE ` `°~ Eu~i°°- ° E o aai~~°-' o~ a m~ vi~~~ ~~U c o oao o °$moo ° E as cN mm N>>..E om c a i ~ ~ E c a ~ c0 0 o N `o>~n E m L ~" a~ `° ~ca o ~.? . c a o~ y a"m ~ o 0 0 c ~ ~ ~ m o °-_ m m o ~ m v i E . _ _ N ~ V o a m mr ~ s a ° O c >..E ° m> C N m ~ ~ d _ O..C O .~ L~ 7 C ~ C 0 m C O p m~ ~ a i o a N ° > r ` O (q i m U a O_ C '~ NEm~ ~-' ~aF-~ ~ o~ p ~>o a mN ~= ° ~ - ~ rN`m o m o E ._ a~ i ~ ~m aNi`o jaoi`6U ~ voroQ~N ~o E oa E~ N ca o m~ m~ o E o~ c c°'i°~o-m~m N o E a>'~O r= _ tl LE°-E om E "gym ~ o > °' os ~ -- m a c ° ~Y o ~. E v ~ g~ ~ °-° r ma ~ i at 3 ° O ~ ~L m o E E._ 0 0 ao N C O >, oE N (0 O C ~- ~ p1 co '.J ~ Ol (0 o o -O C C VJ oc w O' °NO O ~'~ 2 C O m ~O ~ m N=~ E °- 0 O O m '- 7 oc O ~ O `p C r E y .o ~ N d >~ N C .U L ~ N ~ C~ t4 N N y L r A E C ~ U~ C ~> ~ `y ~ C t9 ~~ R N d - C ttl C .- "" U N C O a ~ O p` N ~ O a O. O a >:.C E E N L - OI O ~ O) C U O = C O c6 ~ .J rn V1 N - IO u! .O - C ~ ~ N O F-' E U O) ~' = ,-- U N' O O Y6 > ~ N ~ E°- U -cow ~ (9 o °- N C ~ C ttl ~ G e S ~ EE m ~ QoE~o m ° N c i~E o ~ " md o o~oc U.o o.-cm -o~o y t m._ a iaci oo' aai~ U i~ a i= oa C ~ ~ oa ~ ro-o L o- o E ~ ' ~ O ° `mE ac o ~~> v E ~m O_ '~~ o~ a°iy °'mE t 0o ca~0o, o>o.E -a~ o tv,m2 3 Eni. ~ c a --E- ~ E m o N U a~ LL O O m` U a ~ O. O a~ U - ~a~ O C c N ~O ~C ' O o~y N U C cm U O >, L U Q to da a`m`o¢`m ~.=-min~N ~oN ~~-~~ to ¢~Ea' cLn`o N O m-`ono ~ O G O damU >> O rnUo~ t6 m> C [0 N o ° 0 0 o d O °~- o L •" O a U O. N o_ N E o. t6 L O • ~91 dk ~ " ~. ~? . ~ ~ ^~ ~~ ¢ M V V 7 V s~ _ ~g -q N ~ '3 ~~ u x~ ~~~ ~~~y, ~ ~_~.'" t ,, ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ,~, c~~ ;~~ ~~°; 4:~. ~ a a ~ Q a N C O C O C O C O C O a ~ O) i 01 ~ QI ~ O) ~ O d .C N C y C N C y ~ , le C ~o C ~o C ~o C ~ ,. f ~ ~ tl .~ ~ ~c Yka.~ ~ c 4 ~~ " ..e ^ '~ U ~ U U U U m ~~ ~ ." ~ ' . A ` ~ ~ 'n ~ Q d d v P ~ ~] CO 0] m ~ m ~ h: ~ y~,, ~•5 ~ a m L L ro c °~ m o- o o~ y m a N c _o ~ a c o ~ '° .~.~ ' c E ~. I m o ~' ° m L ~ U U U '" + O ~ O ~~ E O N N `` ~ O O d ~ .'- N a Gr ~~ D O '6 `o~U C O aU o L °E ENE ~ a~ N - m.a"i~N>. .~ Q roL Q ~ "p6 ~ ~ ~ d . ° d O ~O i~ ~ > N- ~ C C . m 3 U N s C _ U O W E O .~ ~ ~ 3 c m. °- no.y o ~ -° ? o T'" o °- °- ~- o a ° E ~ a~ m N U ~ > l, -- v~aQ NU~° ~ E N o.~m ~ vi cnm~m a a 3o~~R ~ > . a i Nco om ~~ E~ro~~~ " ~ c m~ o° o Q -~ ° a~ E N o ao -~ ° „ `~ ~`d ~ m~ c =~ ~ n . m ~ a - c o° z E'u-. ` ,...mm~N a3ca SQL '`'.a~N ~~~ c. a~ocm a ~ i ~ u c.9 ~ ~ o ~~~ a N E m ~ N ~:~ ` ° m n s > f W , 'WS"r~ ~ o ~ D p C ~ C ~ L v1 o ro - . N °: ~a ~ p] N O ~ C N . a1 p . Q ~ R (U in y ~U E O ~ ~ N C C N R N ,~ N C ;;""-N" O O a~ O .) d ~ ,~OE9 r( C~ _ O U >' ~ U ~ m U C O a ~ ° N ~ ° o p 'D`` ' ~ L O) we mac ~ N ro ~ ~° E N ° ° nU ~ L ~ ° y C O O ~L , ( 9 E C~ ~"?m~c ~ b €~ d .N a O t0 _ O N C~ ~ _ O p N N_ R ro~ ~c 7 _ ? m E O~ O .y= T ~i 'y ~ U U C ~ O) S O N m N J U~~ ~ O j ~OK O~ a T 21 J O ~,o;i W v,d ti ~ mrNn .N° `om EC3~~ ~°~ `~~_-v>E o_a ~.A1 L O~ L ~ c E .- ~ L t6 R O >> L> ~~ ~~ : O p O k ~~i F- N ~ 3 ~ c i a i LL rn N O >. d C7 N .= U ~ t6 ., L> L O ~ - d In > ~ N U 'C 2 F-92 to a a a a a ' a a a a a N N N N N m m m ro ccc o. a a a a o `o `o `o `o 3 3 i 3 3 d ro m m d ¢ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ U U U U U [O ffl m m m m m m m m C a. p a ~ N ._ O C O) O C L N N L L N N ro a 0 C a UI C U ~ ~- 0 - D 0~ .J (6 O O Ol ~ a N~ O C E a E U (` U- N 0 > Y N C N ro ~ f6 a ro O N N N T C a a d O O O N - . 0~ ~ 0 3~ L N N N a N N °. N a N N m C~` ~ °oU~~ ° mo LN ° a "o-aci com -°'E d c a~roa~ N >` m U d ~ U d 0 a U .L. Q (0 N U1 ~ ° y L ~ y d ~ > C ~ O N ° C Q1 ~° EE.S ~,~E a 'oo ~ c a >~E ~_d y ~ ~~ ~y~ ° ~Lm~m ~'o~ `~~°''~ -; u' a ~ E~° Nino o m 3'>° c°i ° N L L O_ N (6 ~ -- N i ~ a E N ° ~ a~ o- O o L- -'ro a ° o- in ~m o o 'o m c ro n°N.LO>N t6 O V~a~U N o3~N °1j L ~ a~oaci N g~oN [~ O) U r N O Q~ N O Lm Q~ C roE O_ _ °`~ ~E ocE Gm a ~~ 9 ~ EE c o d. o .c ~ °o ~ o o Z`... o ° > ~~ °mri ~ a ~' a ~~ ~m ~ _ d o m E v Eaci o i`o_ O a °'°~ ~ -° E o~ o so..a°i.4~ro~ 'c~~ ~>.ro.~o . N c ~ E X _ i aa m ~Eao.~U E ° m m`tlmmt0 ~Y~ OE» iR°a i a N ~~m roEy `o N N C roa N . _ ro U U E m o E" _ E N O .J m ~ m? ~ E E c_ m _ a d ~ N ° RS .~ `N ,~ N 'C ~N ~ E C - `O C ° C ° ~ ~ - ro 01 m ' N ~ N E > ~ ~ < a o N~o ~~'~ ~°.`m_ ->.N2 °-~m° a ~~.Soz c ro aaNi o~~ > ~ ~ ro a°i ._ ,= W ? o a X ro y o m~ E m s ~ d o h m L N ~ y° ro ~ E a a ~ "° c m c oT ~ o `o oa~-Op'N Naa i ro ccoo= v, -°oL Coro y a~ roc°~ - ~ro m ~ ° a o_ U ~L c m m ~° `° ~ cN °~ ro a OOm ~ '~ o ~ = o o o° `o 0 - L 0- m m oo- ° o 0 U `m r m wa o E ~~ o ro a c o ~mm Eo~.4 N . °~- aN c UN N- U~°~ ~ No ~ 'a . m~o ~ a° c c ~ m O Ul L~ ac C~ U as o N D O f6 - mm- ro ro a m_ C L C " cn -- > .. O ro O C m U N S ~ . - O C ~ ro E N C ro 3 w U m .N ~ a o ~ a '~ ° r ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - O ~ :~ E N N _~ a i 'E C O~ C J? ~ '~ ~ m C U ... 0= C O ro N ~ ~? J O ~- ~ ~ L O T O T ~ N O N ~ C O ~ E > N °' d O a 01 Q O Q N U~ N a . U ro d L d N f J D U 0J d ~• O • ,~,,.., _~~, i ~ . I ,~ N N ~ ~ N ' '~ C a +~.+ ~~ Y qiiq~~~ m )4 ~ i ry • ~y~y ~7~"~ ~ x 4~ t. i a a ~ ~ " a a a (A m N m Ft N to m m a a oa H c 0 O O i 41~ 4i~ SM O O .U i N m , ~ 3 ~ ` ' d N ~ C N N N ~ N 7 C ~ CC • ~ Q ^ ~ A. t ~ ~ 9~ ~ U U ~'~ U U ro m G~ m m U rsnx~ $@ z" ry^ £y 3 m m ,. o o O ~ r- - w a m mn_mE~'~si`o L~=oF~oT o>.~~~c s°'ma~ a°~ y>.~ a~Um ;~ '~ ' ro~~mL •y =='moo-F~`-°ro a~m~Ta~ ~~m L oyro ~>, y N Z i ro J C > D OI C u ro N y d~ O y Y ~ C ro 0 Q N O U a N O d> N N O ` ~ L 'O uj ~ O> 0 0 N~ Y ` C O N O ~ ° ~mm U O EodU~L ro ~ ~ „ _ C ro T ro~E` t° O N E L U J`. >• N ro r y ~ ro O NO c o ~O O ' c i o S `o c 3o a 3 QO ~~'«ONL O_-C~~L O D ~ ~ . O O CN N O ro....J ~ ~ ro~ ~T N A C C~ O Q y "' ~ O d d Z :~N?~Ig~r V1 N ~ O J y~ y N ' N d O) C ~ ' U CO ~ C L.. O C C O' ~ -O O- oro ro o C ro W i >cZZE N V roEo ~~~ t%y~? C L CJ 01 N O. oF- ~-aEvio ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ . °oo ro a ° E Y a o c E 'o d ~~ ~q CS ro a m o o N .`_ U ~~ ~ J ~7:~;i"r,' u:'~iF~i " ro c c >..m ~ O N ro ~' ° ro m '._ ~ m m Y R1 ro 'O x V o C y .«. C ° ~ a to N -° i"""d'i:~. ~5 ` m~~ O. N N N ~ ~ ~? -O N N E N E o ~`o~°' ~sQ1O -'EN '•- oE o E °'o-o a > ~o c °j , ~ n~'~ ~~ oroo Nm Eo i `~' m~ p cco o u o T c c E o. ~ ooJ am m ~ c4c>,~W -d >~'>s~ ! ~'°,,~ ny ~oc m > a m `-° ~ -om , ~mr_ ~c ro C N d -O E N L N J X 0 0 (n O O L ~ v~ , ro ~. >° 0) y O y ~ C y . ~ r .- ro .roC a -6 C ' N x ° ~ > ~ Z dl ~ y ,r.: ro -O ro X 4J 3 O C C nI C ro a C C ° °' O E Ol ro ro O ro O p~ ~ ;~~T ~ -O L U O_ ~ N O C ~~ O ~ ro O T C . D N N N W °' o ~ y C O. ~ m o E U '-]O U ..., ~ ~ € _ ~? ro N L ` L O ° p~ ` C N N m 'O a .N t c ,~ ~ ~ v c ° o a c ~ c ° ~ ° E m E o J ~ :'~*Y a, 3"~~ c ~ m N y ~ .c ~ ~- o m ~ ~ .4 m o o `~ m °' ~ U . c o ~ ~ c o '~~ o ~ ro=m ~o ma 'z ° . ~ - E ~ ~ o U°~.~ro m N a o ~ ~ Q >, °' n~ ~ >. o°Jm o o o j L o..o E~ o c o w y r .5 c U . .°~ c .4 c '- 3 z. ~; o ro N o ~ c U ~ C ro _ J w c . ~ a ro ~ °"~ ~ fn ro N N L N O ~o ~m V,~'EU y y C O y o. o - ~ 0 O O' ": rsi ~~;~rt ' [i1 0 S) y d - °'o N a~ o Z zU ~ rooNro O (n - °c 'o~°JJ>.w°'o_o ~ oc~°'~° m croim~ ~s~~':tis ~ `om m`0o~ o ..~n aoL~n . °om~ ~oy~Nmv ~OL~o . ~~=cin ~''m~, LdEmUa o~ mmo'o bc °-~~~'mOm>mro °aLNOm ~aci~o <o ~~mmtOL x E` °'.T~ 6LO-° y oo~'~I a ro ~ 3 -`o ~ E m m a m 3 ~ U¢ o -O m U , :-Zy a ~ w a E~ 3 a `o y - U °' F- _ .~ U L .C C O n F -94 v v Q Q 0 0 U D) j U O) ~ C C C C ~ U D OU U U m m d C N T L O L Y ~' T- C O T O~ N C ro C > :_ > N to N ro O- L N O (6 >. N C U N , -ro " mEtiroooU'o m~ s~ ~' ° -O ro~m ° ~o i °i >i a~~3m~ro'o~ N N ~a io a N Y >, ~ ' N ro U (n N C - >. O C R3 N- N N N E O N ro ro_ O. m $ ~ N O . ~ ~ N > U .~L.. N ~ N O O ~~ N O C C O N O~~ ^ L C ~>> N ~ C U N N d d L ro C O (n 01 V E U L ... O O U C .~.. O "6 OI O x N itl"o ~ ~ SxEx"~3 ~ ca o>,`.ro N ,C oL- ma ia° ~'mro DO_N~o aEo~'oa~ m"N3 v, E o" :_ C._ ~ N ro-;._ U o ro E o d o ~ O O ~ ~ U d d ~- OSU .- of T ~. -- C ~ O (U ` ~ . y E y O ~. _ C U C ~~ N .O C . CJ O C ~ O N ro O O h = ' N ~ C t 6 O ~ _ .O C O 'N N ~ a ~ = O O C U _ O , ~ m 0 C U ro ro 0 0 C L O SJ ~ L C O 0 C O N ~ ~- ro ma ~ Loa ia~ aa N o c> ~E ~°' 2 - ' N ro o s N N C C f6 t4 O r. >, c ~a~pm a E > O >, N O =`°- N O Z - a N ~ o ~ r L o ~ ago N Q ~ O~ .J L; OI " T O ~ O7 ~ O p L .J ~II O N ro to O U -O N N > U O~ a fn -6 ~ "O ~ W -O U ~~ L ~ - 'U C N N ~ ~m~ ~ ~ m-O O,C '~ ro ~ dy O C 0 L C y-O L ~ a (~ in ~ ' 6 ~ U~ r n N ul ~ y .C y 2 L ~ c L N a~~ vOi ~;7 ? ~ E ~ >, U d A ~ K~x& ~ ~ C d ~ LL a c°i E~a~ ° m O O ~ ° o ~ m° ' m ~ O tiw C U p~ O / ].; m _ m O _ o iF~ ¢ C7 U s y U ~'!!~~' o 0 0 ~ ~ s o O a} L L L ~a 2 ' ~ L J O N N y f2G' 3 ~ ~ to ¢ ¢ U ~` ~ N (h O ~O N r C ° rn N a fe °' a ~ a > N o a ~, ~ ° a ¢ 5 ¢_ E ~ .~ o d E i.i U ~ n ~ Y d r. = ~ C O G N (/J N .~ m U m L O C O O a v ~ ~; Q @ Ql U ~ ~ c ""~ w v. ~ o c T . U ° °- ~r ~ 7 a ~ ` . i~ U ~ c 4 Z " C U ss~~~~ + 3~p1; U O U j N p Oi ~ ~ ~~ W p" F O1 ~ O U A L r'"++~ -. O ° C d ~S3 AOg a ~ O O ~~ Q Cfl U O W mom... ° C m ~~ O ~ i `o ~!~> o ~~-' O N ~:.~ O m v N _ C O) N C N E " ° Q1 0, m a ~_= ° - o m ~ .N m aps m ' `o N m a 9 ~ a C ~ ~L. a ~ o ° `o .N ny? ~ U O t0 C a ;~dr '~ p ~ ~ ~ O P_sul; E ° w ~ ?L3 O rip,"' U ~ ~ ` ~ ° O ~ a ~ a iv m a S knt/!f. p SN: O O W O O U -ea Vl C O .~ .~ a a N Y U d t U 0 T Gl Y • - ~95 STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18449 SUBJECT: IVISION APPLICANT: JOHN MORRISETTE, CUCAMONGA 220 L.P LOCATION: APN: 0227-171-29 AND 30 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G l R i t Completion Date enera equ remen s 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 18449 is granted subject to the approval of Victoria Arbors Master Plan DRC2007-00047. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-42, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The _/_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - 8 1,926.75 B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning _/_/ • Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the _ date of the approval. F ~96 Project No. SUBTT18449 Completion Date C. Site Development 1 it Th h ll b d l d d i t i d i i d h . eve e s e s a e ope an ma n a ne n accor ance w t the approved plans which include _/_/ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ Siate Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 12. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. _ 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ 14.- On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the ~ required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping 2 - F-97 Protect No. SUBTT18449 Completion Date including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a • cash deposit on any property. D. La ndscaping 1. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 _/_/_ slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 2. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. tt. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope_planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 4. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code and/or Victoria Arbors Master Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 5. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and • coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_/_ perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. E. Environmental 1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the I-210 and I-15 Freeways _I_/_ in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 2. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation _/_/_ measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on-and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 3. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the _/_/_ issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ • implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the _ E~98 ~ Project No. SUBTT18a49 Completion Date amount of ~ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. • Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. F. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) G. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the _/_/_ time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/ • submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/_ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for,non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. _/_/_ 3. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or _/_/_ noted on the final map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map. 5. Easements for public sidewalks andlor street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be _/_/~ dedicated to the City. n F ~99 Project No. SUBTT18449 Completion Date Street Improvements • 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 86-557, no person shall make connections from a source oT energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions oT development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportioriate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter hC. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Blke Trall Other Long Meadow Drive X X X X X Victoria Park Lane (e) Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Modify existing for Local street connection. • 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City • Standards or as directed by the City Englneer. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~_~. -~-~ -/_/ -~-~- F100 Protect No. SUBTT18449 Completion Date f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the -title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size t]ty. Victoria Park Lane Parkway Chitalpa Tashkentensis Chitalpa 3 feet 25 feet o.c. 15-gal. Fill-in Parkway Pinus Canariensis Canary Istantl Pine B feet 25 feet o.c. 15-gal. Fill-in Median Ginkgo Biloba Maidenhair Tree 5 feet 25 feet o.c 15-gal. Fill-in "Fairmount" Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Lots "A" and "B'' adjacent to Victoria Park Lane and Lots "C" and "D" adjacent to Long Meadow Drive. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- I -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • F101 6 Project No. SUBT718449 Completion Date 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the _/_/_ developer until accepted by the City. D i d Fl l d C ra nage an oo ontro 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map _/_/_ approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _/_/_ property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured _/_/_ from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 4. For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to _/_/_ handle Qtpo and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle the Qtop if the sump outlet is plugged at Streets "B" and "C". 5. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a _/_/_ sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. L. Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, _/_/_ an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Tentative Tract Map 18449. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, _/_/_ electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. _/_/_ 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the fequirements of the _/_/_ Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals . 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities _/_/_ District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 2. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building • permit issuance if no map is involved. 7 F102 Project No. SUB7T18449 Completion Date 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if • at least 50°/ of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Provide a copy of the final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading Plans to the _/_/_ Building and Safety Department. The WQMP and Grading Plans are subject to review by the Building Official. u • F103 8 RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00047, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM SCHOOL TO MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL (4-6 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.79 ACRES OF LAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND LONG MEADOW DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF - APN: 0227-171-29 AND 30. A. Recitals. 1. American Beauty Development Company filed an application Development Review DRC2007-00047 requesting a change to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found; determined, and resolved by the Planning • Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property within the City; and b. The proposed Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment will not have a significant impact on the environment; and c. The proposed change in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan land use designation of the subject site will be consistent with the land use concept and density provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The proposed land use changes will more effectively implement the goals and objectives of the Victoria Community Plan that sought to fulfill the need for housing in a variety of residential types including single-family residences. The requested land use change is consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation of Mixed Use. The change will also be compatible with the existing residential development in the immediate area. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs • 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area; and F104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 Page 2 b. The proposed Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. ' 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. • b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the • whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission therefore is forwarding the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration to the City Council for their final consideration as the adoption will reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on their initial findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration by the City Council. c. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. d. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC2007-00047 by adoption of the attached City Council Ordinance, as shown in the attached • Exhibit A of the Ordinance. F105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 • Page 3 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied • either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. F106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 Page 4 • • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to • incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall protect the wetlands adjacent to the site and ensure that construction debris, fill, and water do not enter the wetland site. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of F107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 • Page 5 approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study: The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to • allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,p emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. L J F108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 Page 6 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from-the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Hydrology 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading • Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP) prepared by MDS Consulting, (January 3, 2007) to reduce pollutants after construction entering • the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped F109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 • Page 7 areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage • under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director and Building Official for review and approval, building plans that demonstrate compliance with the noise attenuation recommendations of the acoustical engineer as contained in the Noise Analysis prepared by Mestre Greve Associates (April 11, 2008), and on file with the Planning Department. Any alternative methods proposed for mitigating noise impacts on the project shall be prepared by the acoustical engineer and presented to the City for review and approval by the Planning and Building Departments. 2) Exterior: A masonry wall, ranging in height from 3 feet to 5 feet, shall be constructed along the perimeter of the project for Lots 17 through 25 along Victoria Park Lane in accordance with the sound study and Exhibit S1 by Mestre Greve Associates. 3) Interior: Upon submittal of a Development Review application for house product on the subdivision, an interior noise analysis will be required demonstrating compliance with City's noise standards. The noise analysis shall include any necessary mitigation measures to reduce interior noise levels to City standards. • 4) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m., including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. F110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 • Page 8 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 7) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings: • Plannino Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of ay such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman • ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary F111 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-59 DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY October 22, 2008 Page 9 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolutio passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: n was duly and regularly introduced, City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a 22nd day of October 2008, by the F112 ORDINANCE NO. 08- • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIAARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00047, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE PLAN FROM SCHOOL TO MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR 8.79 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF VICTORIA PARK LANE AND LONG MEADOWS DRIVE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0227-171-29 AND 30. A. Rentals. 1. American Beauty Development Company filed an application for Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment No. DRC2007-00047, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 22, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2007-00047 and issued Resolution No. OS-59, recommending the City Council approve the above listed application. 3. On , 2008, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on , 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 8.79 acres of vacant land that slopes from north to south. Said property is currently designated as School; and b. The project site is currently zoned School and is within the Victoria Arbors Master Plan. The properties surrounding the site are also in the Victoria Arbors Master Plan and specifically identified as single-family residential development to the north and east in the Low-Medium Residential (4-6 dwelling units per acre) District; single-family residential development to the south in the Low-Medium Residential (4-10 dwelling units per acre) Residential District; and Victoria Arbors Park and the wetlands to the west in the Park District; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and • d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element by opening additional opportunities for families to have a choice of living environments; and F113 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08-XX VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Page 2 e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent • properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment, nor the surrounding properties as the amendment will allow forthe subdivision and future construction of 31 single-family detached residential units. Also the surrounding properties are residentially zoned, and this amendment will be a natural fit with those zones; and f. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with the existing land use in the surrounding area. The amendment allows for the subdivision and future construction of 31 market rate single-family residential units on 8.79 acres of land and this zone change is compatible with the developments in the surrounding districts; and g. That the proposed amendment would not have signifcant impacts on the environment, nor the surrounding properties as the adjacent properties are residentially zoned and changing this district to Low-Medium Residential would allow for a natural transition between the zones; and h. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the General Plan is currently zoned Mixed Use Low Residential District. SECTION 3: Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment is hereby amended to change the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Map (Exhibit 4-B of the Victoria Arbors Master Plan) in words and figures as • shown in the attached Exhibit A. SECTION 4: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The City Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independentjudgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on these findings, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring • Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources F114 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 08-XX VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00047 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Page 3 Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The City Council therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. SECTION 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competentjurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, clauses, phrases or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, circulated in • the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. F115 Mixed use °a Use Single Mixed use Family Mixed Uxe Single Family 4-6 /Acre Singlr Famiy 4.6/Acre 4-6/Acre NAP Mixed use Single Family 4-6/Acre ~ i Subject Site Mixed use Temple Property + ! Single Family Mized Use 4-6/Acre NAP MfxeJ use Single Family 4-6/Acre Mixed use Single Family 4-10 / Aere Mixed use Single Family Jb /Acre +' f r'sl~ lil_diw// L=uaity~ r 1:eaid=utiul ~' • • ^ ^ Vlanrlo Patk Foothill XoulaveM / ~~a~ `Qj Legend nnu Tome Amn to he MuterPlvnnaW `~~ ~r Mixed llu CummmeulRFrnnvl Cenmr MuN tine Commercivl lkxivnnl HelneJ Mixed ere Medrvm MmM1 RalAemul ur ~`- Xiah Uenmry Sevmr xnumne ® wrnre> rmrem Mlaetl llx Vlllvee Center Commertul ^) Mixed Um/ M.H. Ra.IGrmmemul IMal. lil¢h Uenmry' Rn or Cnmmemvq ® MuN Ure MN Hreh Rmltlemivl © Hieh Demm~ Mulo--lvmlN L ^ Mned Ux flmQv Fvmily.l-INAVrt T IFither 46/AVrtnr )-IUTACrt) ^ Mrxed Use Single Fvmlh 46l ACrt VICTORIA ARBORS MASTER PLAN Base Line Road to Foothill Blvd. Exhibit ~ EXHIBIT 4B F116 ' ,-~e Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ~~~. L ~ Fire Construction Services '~,~~ STANDARD CONDITIONS February 22, 2007 Cucamonga 220 L.P. NWC Victoria Loop & Meadow Drive SFR Tract 31 Lots SUBTT18449 and DRC2007-00047 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. • b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1) At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2) At intersections. 3) On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4) As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5) A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. F117 FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application • Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site.' CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant. flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the• RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. F118 -~E ~~._ • ~' T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N C A` Staff Report DATE: October 22. 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REVOCATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-04R -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT - To consider revocation of an Entertainment Permit in conjunction with a restaurant use, located at 9740 19th Street -APN: 1076-011-10. Related File: Entertainment Permit 87-06R. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-06R -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT - To consider revocation of a Conditional Use Permit for the serving • of alcoholic Beverages in conjunction with a restaurant use, located at 9740 19th Street -APN: 1076-011-10. Related File: Entertainment Permit 89-04R. BACKGROUND: On August 8, 2008, deputies from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, along with the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC), conducted an ABC compliance check of multiple bars in the City including Pepper's Mexican Restaurant. The compliance check resulted in one patron's arrest for public intoxication, the bartender being cited for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person, and Pepper's manager being cited for having an expired business license. The Police Department contacted the City and informed them of the results of the compliance check including Pepper's expired business license and the extensive history of police calls-for-service to the business. The City sent the applicant a letter requiring that Pepper's Mexican Restaurant bring their business license current and pay back fees. The applicant brought the business license application form to the Planning Department for zoning compliance verification. The application listed the business name as Pepper's Sports Bar and described the business as being a sports bar and grill with live entertainment and televised sporting events. The Planning Department staff sent the applicant a letter on August 14, 2008, (Exhibit A) informing him that a sports bar is not permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial District and that the approved Conditional Use Permit for the location was for a restaurant with a bar. The applicant was advised in the letter to cease the sports bar use within 10 days from the date on the letter. • The applicant contacted Planning Department staff and informed them that they were in the process of reopening the restaurant's kitchen and that they would remove the "Sports Bar" sign. Staff visited the site a few weeks later and found that the applicant had removed the "Sports Bar" sign and that the kitchen appeared to be in operation, but that the floor plan for the dining ITEM G&H PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP86-07 and EP89-04 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 Page 2 • room was no longer in compliance with the approved entertainment permit. Instead, the dining room had a layout that is more commonly found in a sports bar, including a low bar table around the dance floor with table top video games facing a large screen television, high bar tables and chairs and small cdcktail tables. Staff researched the improvements and found that the improvements were never reviewed by the Planning Department. A follow up letter was sent to the applicant on September 17, 2008, (Exhibit B), informing him that staff had visited the business and found that Pepper's Mexican Restaurant was in violation with the approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP87-10) and the approved Entertainment Permit (EP90-36). The applicant was given 30 days to bring the business back into compliance with the approved entitlements and listed a series of changes that were required to gain compliance. On September 24, 2008, a detective from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department came to the Planning Department and delivered a report compiling all the calls-for-service that the Police Department and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department have made to the site. This includes 42 calls-for-service for the year 2007 and 43 calls-for-service for the year 2008 (up to the month of June) by the Police Department and 26 calls-for-service for 2007 through June 2008 by the Fire Department. Included for review is a letter written by Sergeant Jeffrey Notaro of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department summarizing the results of their investigation (Exhibit C). Also included is a pie chart breaking down the types of calls-for-service to the location for 2007 and 2008 (Exhibit D). Because of the large number of calls-tor-service and the applicant's lack of compliance with the • approved entitlements, staff scheduled a public hearing for the Planning Commission to consider the revocation of the applicant's Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit. Planning Department Entitlements: On March 10, 1987, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit CUP87-06 (Resolution 87-70) (Exhibit E) permitting Amici's Pizza N Stuff Restaurant to expand their existing restaurant by 900 square feet (for a total 3,700 square feet) and to serve alcoholic beverages. The Conditions of Approval limited the service of alcoholic beverages to be between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. and required that a full menu be provided when alcoholic beverages were served. On March 28, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Entertainment Permit EP89-04, Resolution 90-36, (Exhibit F), allowing Pepper's Mexican Restaurant to have live entertainment from Tuesday through Saturday, between the hours of 8:30 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. Permitted- entertainment was limited to a "single musician or small combo (3-4 piece) to play jazz or soft pop music." They were also permitted to allow dancing on a dance floor not to exceed 146 square feet. The approval stipulated that any intensification or type of entertainment would require the modification of the Entertainment Permit. Entertainment Permits are required to be renewed on a yearly basis. The last renewal on file for Pepper's Mexican Restaurant was for the year 2006. ANALYSIS: The premise of a Conditional Use Permit is to create the flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Development Code and the General Plan, while at the same time allowing uses whose unique operating characteristics requiring special consideration in order to • operate in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding uses and to mitigate any potentially adverse impacts. The Conditional Use Permit sets forth Conditions of Approval judged G&H-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP86-07 and EP89-04 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 • Page 3 necessary in order to meet the goals set forth in the Development Code for the district in which the business operates. Once approved, the Planning Commission has the authority to review a Conditional Use Permit at any time in the future in order to verify that the business is in compliance with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Conditional Use Permit and that its operation is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious to the other properties in the vicinity. If the Planning Commission finds that the use violates the Conditions of Approval or is detrimental to the other property owners in the vicinity, and that modifications are not available to mitigate the impacts, the Commission has the authority to revoke the Conditional Use Permit, which will require the business to cease and desist the use in the time allotted by the Commission. Following the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit, no application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or substantially the same use on the same site may be filed within one year of the date of the revocation. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant is located within the Neighborhood Commercial District which only permits bars or cocktail lounges when they are operated in conjunction with a restaurant and always requires a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of distilled spirits. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant is in violation of the Municipal Code, the Development Code, the approved Conditions of Approval outlined in the Conditional Use Permit and the approved Entertainment Permit for the following reasons: 1. The current floor plan is more indicative of a bar rather than a restaurant and is in violation of the floor plan approved under the Entertainment Permit. The Conditional Use Permit requires that the service of alcohol must be in conjunction with a restaurant and with the availability of a full menu. Additionally, it stipulates that the service of alcoholic beverages must cease when the full menu is not available to customers and limits the hours that the bar may be operated which is between 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. According to the applicant and police reports, the applicant is offering the sale of alcoholic beverages after 11:00 p.m. 3. The Entertainment Permit limits entertainment to a live band with up to four members and dancing. They are currently offering music provided by a disk jockey (DJ) and have table top video games. Any intensification of the type or quantity of entertainment being offered is grounds for revocation of the Entertainment Permit. 4. The Municipal Code (Section 5.12.115) requires that all holders of an Entertainment Permit must file and pay a yearly renewal of their Entertainment Permit. The applicant has not filed a renewal for the years 2007 or 2008. 5. The Municipal Code requires that businesses have a valid business license and that they pay business license taxes. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant has not had a valid business license or paid their license taxes since January 1, 2005. • In addition to the above violations, Pepper's Mexican Restaurant is in violation of the provisions outlined in the Development Code which require that they operate in a way that is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare and/or are materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. With the large number of Police Department and Fire Department calls-for-service G&H-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP86-07 and EP89-04 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 Page 4 to the business over the last two years, one can only conclude that their business is detrimentally affecting the safety and welfare of the residents living in the surrounding neighborhood and of the business owners and customers of the commercial center in which they are located. Moreover, the extensive calls-for service are a drain on the City's budget and divert valuable City resources away from other residents and businesses that may need them. In conclusion, it is staff's judgment that the extensive number of violations outlined in this report can not be mitigated with the addition of new Conditions of Approval to the existing Conditional Use Permit or through the modification of the types of entertainment permitted by the Entertainment Permit. Additionally, the data provided by the Sheriff's Department shows that calls-for-service for the year 2008 (43 as of June 2008) are on track to greatly surpass the already large number of calls in 2007 (42). Taken together; staff believes that the revocation of Pepper's Mexican Restaurant's Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit is not only justified, but is necessary to protect the health safety and welfare of the City's residents. l J Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 21 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15321 which covers actions by regulatory agencies including the revocation of entitlements adopted by the regulatory agency. Because the action is to deny an existing Conditional Use permit and Entertainment Permit because of violations of the agency's regulations and of the approved Conditions of Approval and that no construction is proposed, • staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the revocation may have a significant effect on the environment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the revocation of Conditional Use Permit CUP87-06 and Entertainment Permit EP89-04 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Revocation. Respectfully submitted, R. d~ Ja s'R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Resolutio - Letter to Applicant dated August 14, 2008 - Letter to Applicant dated September 17, 2008 - Letter from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department - Pie Charts Summarizing Calls-for-Service for 2007 and 2008 - Conditional Use Permit CUP87-06 (Resolution 87-70) - Entertainment Permit EP89-04 (Resolution 90-36) ns of Revocation for CUP87-06 and EP-89-04 • G&H-4 ~'~ f1 Mayor ~ J DoNAL~ J. Kuarx, M.D. Mayor Pro Tcm L. DENNIS MICHAEL Counci/memberr REx GvnExaez $AM $PAGNOLO DIANE WILLIAMS City Manager THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JACx Lati, AICP RANCHO' C,,UCAMONGA August 14, 2008 Frank Frias 9754 Balaton Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Dear Mr. Frias: The Planning Department has received your application fora Business License (location 9740 191 Street). At this time the application cannot be approved by the Planning Department for the following reason: The proposed activity (Sports Bar) is not permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial • Zone. For reference purposes, a Conditional Use Permit for a restaurant with a bar was previously approved per the attached resolutions: however, the current use is not in compliance and must cease immediately. Please cease the Sports Bar use within 10 days from the date of this letter. If compliance is not received by that time, the Planning Department will forward the matter to the Code Enforcement Division for compliance processing and may include forwarding the matter to the City prosecutor. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to contact this office at (909) 477-2750. Sincerely, ~~ ~. Corkran . Nicholso~n~ru"~-`~L_._. Assistant Planning Director Attachment: Resolutions of Approval C: Business Licenses Code Enforcement CA Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control • I ~' ~ ~ 07 • Rancho Cucarr~n~, ~~ 55729-0807 • Tel 909-477-2700 • Faz 909-477-2849 • www.ciryofrcus ~~/~ DONALD ]. I~UR'rH, IvI.D Mayor Pro Tem L. DENNIS MICHAEL Caunnlmemben REX GUrIERREZ p SAM $PAGNOLO DIANE WILLIAMS City Manager THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JACK LA,u, AICP RANCHO C;UCAMONGA September 17, 2008 Frank Frias 9754 Balaton Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 SUBJECT: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT #89-04 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #87-06 FOR PEPPER'S RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 9740 19TH STREET Dear Mr. Frias: This letter is a follow-up to our earlier communications regarding the operation of Pepper's Restaurant. As was previously discussed, Pepper's Restaurant must operate in conformance with the conditions outlined in Resolution Numbers 67-70 and 90-36 (see attached) and the regulations outlined in the Development Code pertaining to businesses located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. Staff visited your business and found that it is not in compliance with the approved permits or the Development Code. Conditional Use Permit #87-06 permits you to serve alcoholic beverages in conjunction with asit-down restaurant that serves a full menu, and Entertainment Permit #EP89-04 .permits the restaurant to have live entertainment including a band with up to four members and a dance floor not to exceed 146 square feet. The Development Code only permits bars when they are operated in conjunction with asit-down restaurant (full-table service). Staff's visit found that the dining room has been converted into a bar area. The approved dance floor is now surrounded by a low bar table with table top video games facing a large screen television. Additionally, the reception area and booths have been replaced with high tables along one wall and a long bench seat with small tables along another wall. This floor plan is not in compliance with the approved Entertainment Permit (see enclosed) or with the common layout of a sit-down restaurant. To regain compliance with the originally approved permits, the following changes must be made: 1. Return the floor .plan to that approved under Entertainment Permit EP89-04. This includes providing areception/waiting area and an eating area with booths and low tables. 2. Provide table service with a full menu at all times that the business is open. 3. Remove the bar surrounding the dance floor, the video games, large screen television and, all high tables from the dining area. 4. Limit the entertainment to a live band with up to four members playing jazz or soft pop music. Music provided by a disk jockey is not permitted under the current Entertainment Permit. 5. The maximum hours that alcoholic beverages may be served are, between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. •. Remove the alcohol advertising signs from the windows. 10500 Civic Cenmr Di. • P.O. Boa 307 • Rancho Qieamonna, CA 917?9-0307 • Trl 909-477-2i00 • Fna 90')-477-2349 • www ci n~o fleas ~~~SRIT B G & H- 6 FRANK FRIAS EP89-04 AND CUP87-06 -PEPPER'S RESTAURANT September 18, 2008 Page 2 The above changes must take place within 30 days of this letter. If compliance in not obtained by that time, the Planning Department will begin the revocation process of your Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to contact at (909) 477-2750, Monday through Thursday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Sincerely, C~~ I~. ~~ Corkran W. Nicholson Assistant Planning Director c: Business Licenses Kurt Keating, Code Enforcement California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control • u • G&H-7 R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ To: James Troyer, Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ On August 8, 2008, deputies from the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, along with a combined effort from ABC (Alcohol Beverage Control) conducted an ABC compliance check in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The team inspected approximately eight locations throughout the city of Rancho Cucamonga, which included the following: Yard House, Buffalo Wild Wings, Peppers Bar, Knockers Bar, Mc P,lan's, Dean's of Cucamonga, Gilbertos, and Hide-a-While. Approximately eight subjects were arrested for various crimes. Peppers Bar was cited for B&P 25802(a) (Sales to Intoxicated Person), PC 647(f) (Public Intoxication), and the on-site manager was cited for violation RCMC 5.04.030 (Licenses Required) after the business was identified as having a business license expired on 08/31/05. After reviewing previous calls for service, the biggest problem found is the violence that ensues at Peppers Bar. These violent acts pose a threat to the public and to law enforcement. The number of calls for service and the types of calls being handled illustrates the necessity that Peppers Bar be identified as a nuisance establishment in the city of Rancho Cucamonga. The following data shows the calls for service for 2007 and January through June of 2008 for Rancho ~ucamonga Police Department. -January through December 2007: Total calls for service - 42 ' -January through June 2008: Total calls for service - 43 Calls for service were gathered from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department related to the following types of medical responses: assaults, medical aids, and unknown medical problems. The data was collected from actual calls to Peppers Bar located at 9740 19`h Street and calls for service to the area of Archibald Avenue / 19`" Street. -2007 through 2008: Total calls for service - 26 If you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 477-2865, Tuesday through Friday, between.9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Sincerely, MET Divi ~- ergeant Jeffrey Notaro Rancho Cucamonga Police Department -~~ r • t2nnctio CUCAAI ONGA ~,ni.mnu~~in ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I C RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (909) 477-2800 • FAX (909) 477-2863 G& H-8 .~ ~.+ Q 0 /~ V V r~ O m i 'i p~ V N O N ~~ ~ ~ a~i v ~ V O N`r L i ~, ~ ~ 0 LCD ^.. ~ a i a 0 a 0 J ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ Q ~ L ~ i w fA Q ~ ~ ~+ ~ O ~ G1 N d ~ ._ ~ ~ a .~ ~ V1 ~ ~ i Q ~ O L ~ ~ C L y'd ~ N m ~ D ~ ~; N N N N N V V V O N to N M r a ^ o ^ ^ EXHIBIT D .~ ~ O M ~ II ~ ~ V ' Q m C ~ ® ,~ N m ~ ~ ~ y O O p ~ ~ 1 ~ (a C N N `~ O ,~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~Q V ~ > ' O ` _ ~ () O 0 0 V a i a. 0 L a 0 J N v c=4 ~L = N N ~ N d L Q d F- ~ = (Q p p . w y Q 1 ~ ~ L V ~ M~ W 1 N ~, d L a ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ d C Y ~ L 0 vi ~ L ~ ~ v (n V ~ ~ ~ V V V V r ~ M r r ^ ^ • RESOLUTION N0. 87-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 87-06 FOR THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH AMICI'S PIZZA N STUFF RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 9740 19TH STREET IN THE' NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - APN: 202-271-67 WHEREAS, on the 10th day of March, 1987, a complete application was filed by Rancho Cucamonga Realty Properties II, Ltd. for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of May, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is • located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SE CTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on May 13th, 1987. SE CTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 87-06 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This approval shall apply to both the serving of alcoholic beverages and the 900 square foot expansion of the existing facility. 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all applicable City Ordinances, Foothill Fire District requirements and Public Health codes. • 3. Any modification, expansion or other change in operation will require a revision to the Conditional Use Permit. EXHIBIT E G&H-11 RESOLUTION N0. CUP 87-06 - Rancho Cucamonga Realty May 13, 1987 Page 2 4. All signage shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division. 5. The serving of alcoholic beverages must be in conjunction with restaurant usage and the availability of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages shall cease when such menu items are not available to customers. 6. The Conditional Use Permit is granted for an indefinite time period. However, in the event that this use causes adverse effects on adjacent businesses or properties, the Commission may consider revisions or additions to any of the conditions stated hereon. 7. The bar in conjunction with restaurant usage may operate between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. 8. Approval of the 900 square foot expansion is contingent upon preparation of a written agreement, assuring the continued availability of the number of stalls designated for joint use, as required by Development Code Section 17.12.040D.1. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 1987. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATT I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of May, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE • u • G&H-12 RESOLUTION N0. 90-36 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 89-04 TO ADD ADDITIONAL NIGHTS AND EXTEND THE HOURS ALLOWED TO OPERATE AND CONDUCT ENTERTAINMENT WITHIN PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT, LOCATED AT 9740 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-011-10. A. Recitals. (i) On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. (ii) On August 15, 1989, Jeanne Bhatnagar filed for an application for the issuance of an Entertainment Permit (EP 89-04). (iii) On the 27th day of September, 1989, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved the Entertainment Permit. (iv) On February 28, 1990, Jeanne Bhatnagar filed an application for a modification to Entertainment Permit 89-04. • (v) On the 28th day of March, 1990, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described modification. (vi) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolves as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced March 28, 1990 hearing, including written and oral staff reports, and the written, signed and verified application of the applicant, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the northeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue on a lot presently improved with structures and parking which constitute a Neighborhood Commercial Center; and n LJ EXHIBIT F G&H-13 PLANNING COMMISSI(" RESOLUTION N0. 90-36 EP 89-04 - PEPPER 4EXICAN RESTAURANT MARCH 28, 1990 Page 2 r 1 LJ (b) The property to the north of the subject site is a vacant parcel, to the south is a banking facility and a fast food restaurant, to the east is a Medium-High Residential use, and to the west is a vacant parcel and a Low-Medium Residential use. (c) Pepper's Mexican Restaurant is a full service restaurant serving alcoholic beverages such as beer and wine. The proposed entertainment will be provided five nights a week, from Tuesday to Saturday evenings, from 8:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. All entertainment will be centrally located within the facility and no admission fee will be charged. Dancing will be permitted in a dance area which totals 146 square feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced March 28, 1990 public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and (b) That the premises or establishment are not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner; and • (c) That the applicant had not has any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and (d) That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and (e) That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding Neighborhood Commercial Center; and (f) That the applicant has not made any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the following conditions: (1) This approval is for a single musician or small combo (3-4 piece) to play jazz or soft pop music. Any change of intensity of type of entertainment shall require application for modification of this permit. (2) Dancing is permitted on a dance floor area which does not exceed 146 square feet. G&H-14 PLANNING COMMISSIOP' EP 89-04 - PEPPER'S MARCH 28, 1990 Page 3 • SOLUTION N0. 90-36 cXICAN RESTAURANT (3) If the operation of this Entertainment Permit causes any adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for the consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. (4) When entertainment is being conducted, doors shall remain closed for' noise attenuation purposes. (5) Hours of operation of the entertainment use shall be Tuesday through Saturday, from 8:30 p.m. to t_:00 a.m. (6) Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building unless written consent is obtained from all adjoining tenants in conjunction with the Temporary Use Permit application process. (7) Any signs proposed shall be designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign Program and • the City's Sign Ordinance. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH, 1990. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: arryy~~acntei, ylta~rman ATTEST: ~ecreta I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March, 1990, by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY, WEINBERGER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE G&H-15 ~T ' ~'.• ` G'.~c' Zoe L• R ~~ ~ t- - .ISM •, ~ I ~~ I ' • ~ ~ ~ ~~~ .f~ ; ;` i ~ i~ "~ i I~ it 1 c _ 1i ! ~ f i ~o~ i ' ~, J ~ I . ; ~ ~--r~r~ •;b ~_ . - _ ~ ~ .. ~~~ . ' I~I V•r ~:' ' '~' 0 I ~ C ~ ~' j5, i Id' ~. T I II •.O• '-o• i1 ,`~O" 'a6'I Z1 G' ~ 2'Cr"ib' 1:.:'~. T . ' '~ ~ "t . .!s . -J `MU~Glifrf + ' .-~ ~A~1GE ~ ~' • ' ~ FL ooh --I ~ ~'-o--. 4' `- --r ~, I ~/ .. ~ ---, ,. - i~:. _ C ~'~ r- i .. ~'« Y , f . . I _. y I I A I. CITY OF RANCHtl CUCAMONGA TTEM: Modification to EP 89-04 PLANMNG DIVISION 'jTI"LE; Floor Plan N EXHIBIT: B SCALE: N/A G&H-16 RESOLUTION NO. OS-60 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. EP89-04, WHICH PERMITS ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 974019TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-011-10. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. EP89-04, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the'Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the existing restaurant and bar located in a commercial center at 9740 19th Street; b. The property to the north of the subject site is the I-210 Freeway; the properties to the south consist of existing single-family residences; the property to the east is an existing multi-family development; and the property to the west is an existing multi-family development; and c. On August 8, 2008, deputies from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, along with the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC), conducted an ABC compliance check of multiple bars in the City, including Pepper's Mexican Restaurant. The compliance check resulted in one patron being arrested for public intoxication, the bartender being cited for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person and Pepper's Mexican Restaurant manager being cited for having an expired business license. The Police Department contacted the City and informed them of the results of the compliance check including Pepper's expired business license and the extensive history of police • calls-for-service to the business; and G&H-17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-60 EP89-04 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 Page 2 d. The Development Code requires that businesses operate in a way that is not detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare and/or are materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. There have been more than 80 calls-for-service by the Police Department and Fire Department to the subject business over the last two years; and e. The approved Entertainment Permit limits entertainment to a live band with up to four members and dancing. The business currently offers music provided by a diskjockey (DJ) and has table top video games in violation of the approved Entertainment Permit; and f. The existing Entertainment Permit prohibits the intensification of the type or quantity of entertainment without modification of the existing permit with failure to do so is grounds for revocation of the Entertainment Permit; and g. The Municipal Code (Section 5.12.115) requires that all holders of an Entertainment Permit must file and pay a yearly renewal of their Entertainment Permit. The applicant has not filed a renewal for the years 2007 or 2008; and h. The Municipal Code requires that all businesses have a valid business license and that they pay business license taxes. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant has not had a valid business license or paid their license taxes since January 1, 2005. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application has been contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare in that over the last two years there have been extensive calls-for-service to the applicant's business for crimes including assaults and public drunkenness; and b. That the establishment has been operating in an illegal, improper, and disorderly manner in that the applicant has been operating the business without a business license and there have been have been extensive calls-for-service to the business by the Police Department; the applicant has violated the Conditions of Approval of the existing Entertainment Permit by offering entertainment not covered by that approval; and, the applicant has not renewed their entertainment permit on a yearly bases as required by the Municipal Code; and c. That granting the application will create a public nuisance in that the Police Department have made extensive calls-for-service to the site for criminal activity on both the inside and outside of the applicant's business. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 21 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15321 which covers actions by regulatory agencies including the revocation of entitlements adopted by the regulatory agency. Since the action is to deny an existing Entertainment Permit because of violations of the agencies regulations and the approved Conditions of Approval, there is no • substantial evidence that the revocation may have a significant effect on the environment. The G&H-18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.08-60 EP89-04 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN REST_ AURANT October 22, 2008 Page 3 • Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning' Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby revokes Entertainment Permit EP89-04. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. BY: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary • I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • G & H-19 RESOLUTION NO. 08-61 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REVOKING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP87-06 FOR THE SERVING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT. LOCATED IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AT 974019TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1076-011-10. A. Rentals. 1. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP87-06, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the existing restaurant and bar located in a commercial center at 9740 19th Street. b. The property to the north of the subject site is the I-210 Freeway; the properties to the south consists existing single-family residences; the property to the east is an existing multi-family development; and the property to the west is an existing multi-family development; and c. On August 8, 2008, deputies from the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, along with the Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC), conducted an ABC compliance check of multiple bars in the City, including Pepper's Mexican Restaurant. The compliance check resulted in one patron be arrested for public intoxication, the bartender being cited for serving alcohol to an intoxicated person and Pepper's Mexican Restaurant manager being cited for having an expired business license. The Police Department contacted the City and informed them ofthe results of the compliance check, including Pepper's Mexican Restaurant expired business license and the extensive history of police calls-for-service to the business; and d. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department reports that they have made • 42 calls-for-service for the year 2007 and 43 calls-for-service for the year 2008 (through the month of June). Additionally, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department has made 26 calls-for-service to the site for the year 2007 through the month of June 2008. G&H-20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-61 CUP87-06 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 Page 2 • e. The applicant's business is located within the Neighborhood Commercial District which only permits bars or cocktail lounges when they are operated in conjunction with a restaurant and always requires a Conditional Use Permit for the sale of distilled spirits. The approved Conditional Use Permit requires that the service of alcohol must be in conjunction with a restaurant and with the availability of a full menu. Additionally, it stipulates that the service of alcoholic beverages must cease when the full menu is not available to customers and limits the hours that the bar may be operated between 11:00 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. The applicant is offering the sale of alcoholic beverages after 11:00 p.m. f. The current floor plan is more indicative of a bar rather than a restaurant and is in violation of the floor plan approved under the Entertainment Permit. g. The Municipal Code requires that businesses have a valid business license and that they pay business license taxes. Pepper's Mexican Restaurant has not had a valid business license or paid their license taxes since January 1, 2005. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that a stand alone bar is not permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial District. The district was created to be a low • intensity land use area designed to serve the day to day needs of the local residential neighborhoods surrounding the district. The use regulations for the Neighborhood Commercial District were designed with the goal of allowing businesses that attract a local rather than a regional clientele, such as restaurants with a small bar area rather than a stand alone bar. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the City's Police Department and Fire Department have made extensive calls-for-service to the business over the last two years which is detrimentally affecting the safety and welfare of the residents living in the surrounding neighborhood and of the business owners and customers of the commercial center in which they are located. c. The proposed use does not comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the subject business has been converted from afull-service restaurant to a sports bar in violation of the Development Code which only permits bars within the Neighborhood Commercial District when they are operated in conjunction with afull-service restaurant. Additionally, the applicant is selling alcoholic beverages after 11:00 p.m. in violation of the Conditions of Approval. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 21 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15321 which covers actions by regulatory agencies including the revocation of entitlements adopted by the regulatory agency. Because the action is to deny an existing Conditional Use Permit because of violations of the agencies regulations and the approved Conditions of Approval, there is no • substantial evidence that the revocation may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs with staff's determination of exemption. G & H-21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-61 CUP87-06 -PEPPER'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT October 22, 2008 Page 3 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby revokes Conditional Use Permit CUP87-06. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • G & H-22 ~~# -~.. ~,~~~7 `~, ~, ~'J~', T H E C I T Y O F ~, _ RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: October 22, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Corkran W. Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS -Review of Master Phasing Plan for remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development including a classroom wing, temporary classroom modules, and a multi-purpose hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado. APN: 208- 921-36. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, Non-Construction • Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544. On April 24, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. ENTITLEMENT REQUIREMENT: The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is to create flexibility necessary to achieve the objectives of the Development Code and General Plan, and to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with neighboring uses. If necessary, conditions may be required to provide adequate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts. The proposed site is within the Low (L) Residential district. Churches (synagogues) and preschools are permitted uses within the Low Residential district subject to a Conditional Use Permit and Planning Commission approval. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2001, an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 was filed for the construction and occupation of a new master planned Lifeway Church facility on Vineyard Avenue across from Red Hill Park. The facility included several phases of construction with a sanctuary, offices, education building, fellowship hall, and gymnasium. Following the Design Review Committee's approval on April 2, 2002, the Planning Commission approved the project on April 24, 2002, with 15 Planning conditions, as set forth in Resolution No. 02-43, which include the following: 7) The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for each building proposed in Phases 2, 3, and 4 shall be subject to separate Development Review • process. ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 2 9) This approval is for the operation of a church and office and does not include a daycare or private K-12 school. Development Code Section 17.02.100, and repeated in the Standard Conditions for DRC2001- 00439, is the requirement that building permits be obtained for buildings within five years and diligently pursued toward completion. The Master Plan approved under DRC2001-00439 expired on April 24, 2007 without the building permits for the subsequent phases being issued i.e., for the education building, fellowship hall, and gymnasium. The existing portable temporary classroom units were placed on the site in October, 2006, and as determined by the Planning Commission at their December 13, 2006, meeting, the portable temporary classroom units were part of Phase 1 and were not to be permanent but must be associated with a permanent building which has an active Conditional Use Permit. The permanent building to replace the temporary units is the classroom building, which is part of Phase 2. With the expiration of the 2002 Conditional Use Permit, the subject Conditional Use Permit must be approved for the temporary classroom units to remain until the new classroom building is completed. • The applicant submitted a new application, Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, for the remaining phases of the Lifeway Church project that included an educational building, the temporary classroom modules, a gymnasium, and fellowship hall that had not obtained building permits prior to the expiration. In addition, the applicant submitted an additional application fora • Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544, to operate a private/parochial school, Kindergarten through grade 12, at the church facility. Both applications were accepted as complete prior to the April 24, 2007 expiration of the previous Conditional Use Permit. The project received Design Review Committee approval on June 19, 2007. At the August 22, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, the above-referenced projects were presented at a single public hearing for both related requests. The staff report and exhibits were presented and testimony by the applicant and neighbors was taken. The Planning Commissioners expressed serious concerns over several aspects of both requests including school operation and coordination with the nearby public high school, traffic and parking impacts, substantial noise, site design, and visual impacts of the additional phases and compliance for the southerly screen wall. The Planning Commission provided direction that a master phasing plan with potential negative impacts could not be favorably acted upon without reviewing more substantial architectural design drawings, receiving more school operation information and detailed traffic and parking information. In an effort to provide the applicant with an opportunity to rectify these concerns, the items were continued to give Staff an opportunity to devise a draft set of procedures for the applicant to follow to address the Commission's concerns adequately. The continued public hearing items were brought back to the Planning Commission on September 12, 2007, at which time and in conference with the Planning Department Staff, the church modified their application, as follows: The Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 for the private school • operation was withdrawn; and, I-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS • October 22, 2008 Page 3 2. The application for the Master Plan for future phases was amended to take place without a phasing plan and to require a Development Review of the Classroom/Education Building and the Gymnasium. The Planning Commission accepted the above changes and adopted the following additional review procedures, as recommended by Staff for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, as the item was continued for the Commission's action at a future date: 1. The Development Review project DRC2006-00926 should be continued by the Planning Commission to give Staff, the Design Review Committee, and the Planning Commission an opportunity to review the revised project and provide a further hearing opportunity for the site and building design. 2 The applicant shall provide full architectural drawings and a site plan for the Classroom Building and Gymnasium. If changes in grade are necessary, a Conceptual Grading Plan shall also be submitted. 3. A detailed development schedule shall be provided to establish a timeline for the removal of the temporary classroom units and all other parts of the program. 4. The applicant shall provide a quality development package for review to Staff within 45 • days so that it can be docketed for review by the Design Review Committee at the earliest possible date. The Planning Commission will provide the final review of the project after the Design Review Committee is sufficiently satisfied with the design changes to make a recommendation. In accordance with the additional review procedures, as noted above for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, the applicant obtained DRC approval on October 14, 2008, and is now seeking the Planning Commission final review and approval of the project. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Protect Description: Lifeway Church is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit to complete their existing facility by constructing an on-site 15,000 square foot, two-story Classroom Wing and a 10,074 square foot Multi-Purpose Hall. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Single-Family Residential; Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential South - Single-Family Residential; Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential East -Single-Family Residential; Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential West -Park, Open Space C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential North -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential • South - Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential East -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential West -Open Space I-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 4 D. Site Characteristics: The project site is terraced into several levels to accommodate the existing and proposed development, and is located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue and across from Red Hill Park. Currently, the site is developed with the church sanctuary, offices, and temporary classroom modules along with fully developed on-site parking and landscaping. ANALYSIS A. General: The proposed Classroom Wing will be built first, and will provide the younger, elementary children with meeting rooms and nursery rooms on the lower level along with staff offices and other building support spaces. The upper level will provide meeting rooms for the older children along with a children's worship space. Access to the Classroom Wing will be from the existing upper parking lot level and from the mid-plaza level. The upper parking lot access will also provide disabled access via an elevator to the lower level, which will be at grade with the mid-plaza. This building will maintain a northerly street side building setback of approximately 40 feet from the curb face on Calle Del Prado, approximately 365 feet from the neighboring residential property to the east of site, and approximately 170 feet from the neighboring residential properties to the south. Upon completion of the Classroom Wing, the existing portable classrooms will be removed from the site. The Multi-Purpose Hall will be the next structure built, and will provide amulti-purpose • room, storage room, serving kitchen, and restrooms. The multi-purpose room (approximately 6,181 sq. ft.) will be used for dining, social activities, gymnasium, church meetings, and instructional purposes throughout the week. This primarily single-story structure will also have a small second-story area for general offices. Access to the multi- purpose hall will be from the lower main plaza, which is directly across from the existing Sanctuary. Disabled access will be provided via the elevator in the Sanctuary. The Multi- purpose Hall will maintain a northerly building setback of approximately 170 feet from the curb face on Calle Del Prado, approximately 425 feet from the neighboring residential property to the east of site, and approximately 57. feet from the neighboring residential properties to the south. The architecture of the proposed buildings is consistent with the existing sanctuary and office building. Key features include the use of stacked-stone veneer, plaster reveals, textured stucco, and solar bronze colored window glazing. The maximum height for both buildings will be 30'-0" as measured from the lowest adjacent finished grade surface next to each building, as shown on the submitted Site Section 3 drawing on plan sheet A1.1. B. Use Description and Hours of Operation: Religious services take place on Wednesday evenings from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. and on Sunday mornings into the afternoon from 8:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. The use of the proposed Classroom Wing and the Multi-Purpose Hall, as described above, will be in conjunction with the general services of the Lifeway Church. • I-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS • October 22, 2008 Page 5 C. Development Code Compliance: The project complies with the Development Code requirements for setbacks, building height, the provision of required on-site parking, and an efficient on-site circulation system. The site is located on and served by a fully developed public street of the appropriate size and configuration to accommodate the proposed use. Although the applicant is proposing a substantial enhancement of the existing landscape buffer along the site's southerly property line and adjacent to the south side of the Multi- purpose Hall, Staff is including a condition of approval in the attached resolution to require that at least 50% or more of the new trees to be planted shall be a minimum size of 36 inch box. The larger tree sizes will aid in buffering the proposed development from the neighboring residential properties. Staff has also included a condition to clarify the status of the temporary portable classroom units in relation to the permanent facilities for that function. The intent of allowing temporary facilities for temporary occupation is that there is the anticipation of a permanent occupation of a permanent building for the same function. The existing portable units serve as a temporary location to house the meeting rooms for religious educational purposes that cannot be housed in any of the permanent buildings currently on the site. The proposed Classroom Wing will meet this need for the additional meeting rooms, as well as provide nursery rooms, and other support spaces as the classroom • building is proposed as a two-story, 12,000 square foot structure and the temporary units are only about 4,200 square feet in floor area. Therefore, the temporary portable classroom units should be removed as soon as the classroom building can be occupied or when the five-year life of this approval has lapsed, whichever is first. D. Parking Calculations: Development Code Section 17.12.040(6) (5) (g), requires one parking stall for every 4 fixed seats in the sanctuary. Currently, the site provides 230 on- site parking spaces, which well exceeds the 140 spaces required by Code for the 557 fixed seats within the existing sanctuary. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The architect for the project, Jim DiCamillo, informed Staff that the most recent neighborhood meeting was held in the Lifeway Church Sanctuary on January 7, 2008. He estimated that there were approximately 12 to 15 neighbors in attendance along with about 75 to 100 individuals from the congregation. Following an introduction by Pasto"r Esteves, the architect stated that he presented a history of the entire project, an explanation of the process, and a brief summary of where they are in the process. In addition, a slide show was provided that allowed those who attended the meeting to view the drawings that were submitted to the City. He also stated that he described the project and the changes that have been made at that time, focusing on the consolidation of the Gym and Fellowship Hall into a single Multi-Purpose Hall, and that the Pastor informed everyone that the church is not proposing a school with the current application. In his opinion, the project was well received, with the exception of a few who have strongly opposed anything the church submits.. F. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the applicant's more recent proposal on November 6, 2007, January 15, 2008, and October 14, 2008, and • made the following recommendations in the order of each meeting: I-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 6 • November 6, 2007 DRC meeting: Per the direction of the Planning Commission, the applicant presented a preliminary concept plan for the Committee's feedback, which included a scale model of the church campus that offered the opportunity to visualize the building arrangement, site orientation particularly in relation to the neighboring down-slope residences, building mass, and architecture. Complaints from a neighboring property owner who attended the meeting were received that were primarily about building mass, view, and the unsightliness of the site's southerly 6'-0" + high masonry wall that faces the neighboring residential properties. The Committee conveyed their concerns regarding the neighbor's issues, and directed the applicant to return to the Committee with a complete presentation of the design. January 15, 2008 DRC meeting: The applicant submitted a revised proposal that incorporated the following changes to address the design issues that were previously raised by the Design Review Committee: Issue: Consider a re-orientation of the gym so that the shorter dimension of the building faces the slope and the neighboring homes to reduce the massive appearance of the building. • Plan Revision: The Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall buildings were consolidated into a single structure. In the previous proposal these two functions were provided in separate buildings on two levels. In the revised proposal these buildings are combined into a single Multi-Purpose Hall that would be located on the lower mid • plaza level. Such a revision reduces both the building square footage and building mass by eliminating approximately 1,900 square feet. Issue: It was suggested that a possible change in the pad elevation and/or landscaping would help mitigate the neighbor's view. Plan Revision: The pad elevation for the proposed Multi-Purpose HaII was dropped by approximately 14'-0", and substantial landscaping was added in accordance with the submitted Planting Plan. Issue: Can the gym be moved to the east portion of the site? Response: Staff and the applicant believe that the proposed location for the Multi- purpose Hall, which includes a regulation basketball court, is best suited for their needs in terms of public safety when accommodating on-site vehicular traffic and pedestrian circulation. The Committee and Staff agreed that although a possible alternative, moving the Multi-Purpose Building to the east would create a non- integrated campus. Furthermore, the neighboring properties along Calle del Prado could be subject to additional traffic, safety, and noise concerns which would necessitate further environmental studies which were not covered by the original approval and environmental clearances. Issue: A solution is needed to mitigate the stark appearance of the southerly wall that faces the neighboring properties. • I-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS • October 22, 2008 Page 7 Plan Revision: The revised proposal provides for a much greater detail of the landscape and wall treatment along the southerly property line. The area between the wall and the property line is shown on the Proposed Planting Plan with substantial new trees, shrubs, and groundcover material; and according to the applicant the existing wall would receive a stucco finish of color and texture that would match the existing church building. In addition, a 6'-0" high wrought iron fence will be installed to enclose the rear portion of the parking areas, as noted on the submitted site plan. Issue: Several neighboring property owners attended the meeting and expressed their concerns regarding grading, building height, the appearance of the southerly wall that faces the neighboring properties, conducting a school on the subject site, and a request to install "story poles." They felt that such poles would provide further visual guidance as to how high the proposed buildings may appear from the surrounding properties. Response and Revision: It was the general consensus of the Committee members that the church has gone to great lengths to address the issues that have been raised through the review process, which has made the proposal very acceptable; therefore, the Committee recommended that the proposal be forwarded to the Planning Commission subject to the following conditions: • 1. Erect on-site story poles for the purpose of providing a visual aid to further convey to the surrounding residences the proposed height of the new buildings. After the story poles are erected the applicant will notify the Planning Department of the completed installation of the poles, and request that notices explaining the purpose of story poles be sent to the surrounding residences. The story poles shall remain in place for a minimum of two weeks from the mailing date of the notices. 2. Submit a Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan by a certified civil engineer for the purpose of identifying and verifying the placement and height of the story poles, proposed building heights, pad elevations, drainage system, and the extent of grading that would occur to accommodate the new buildings. A reduced copy of the required Grading Plan was provided with each notice to the surrounding residences to further explain the installation of the story poles. The notices were mailed out on May 13, 2008; however, the installation of the story poles was delayed until May 19, 2008. The poles were removed on August 5, 2008. • October 14, 2008 DRC meeting: The applicant submitted a revised proposal that replaces the upward sloping shed roof design for the Multi-Purpose building with a lower profile parapet design. This redesign was recommended by Staff to ensure that the Multi-Purpose building will fully comply with the applicable height requirements, and to further reduce the overall building mass. Additionally, staff informed the applicant of new conditions of approval that were further developed in • conjunction with the review of the re-design. The added conditions include the application of the stucco finish to the southerly wall and its future maintenance as well as the installation of wrought iron fencing along the southerly perimeter of the I-7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 8 • parking lot. The condition for the removal of the temporary modular units was reiterated to the applicant and it was made clear that these shall be removed prior to occupancy of the Classroom Wing. Staff also proposed a condition to require some larger specimen trees (36-inch box) for the southerly portion of the property and along the southern slope above the neighbors' property line. The applicants acknowledged the conditions. The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, Nicholson) approved the redesign as submitted by the applicant and commented that the applicant has gone to great lengths and great expense to respond to the concerns of the neighbors and to make the project better. One neighbor attended the meeting and voiced his continued opposition and concern about the project, its purported impacts, and his perception of a lack of cooperation from the applicant and the City. G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 24, 2002, in connection with the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00493 for the approval of the initial project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent or discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new • or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Conditional Use Permit DRC2006- 00926 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In that the applicant is currently proposing a less intense project by consolidating the initial Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall buildings into a smaller single structure that reduces the building height, square footage, and building mass by eliminating approximately 1,900 square feet. In the initial proposal these two .functions (i.e., the Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall) were provided in separate buildings on two levels. In the revised proposal the buildings are combined into a single Multi-Purpose Hall that would be located on a lower mid plaza level. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the Staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. • I-8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS • October 22, 2008 Page 9 RECOMMENDATION: Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 and adopt Resolution No.08-62, approving the applicant's proposal to expand the Lifeway Church facility by constructing an on-site 15,000 square foot, two-story Classroom Wing and a 10,074 square foot Multi-Purpose Hall at 7477 Vineyard Avenue. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should state the specific reasons for denial and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. Respectfully submit~d, / v~ ~ ~ f~~ James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director • JT:CN/Is Attachments: Exhibit A -Aerial Photo of the Site Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Floor Plans Exhibit D -Architectural Elevations Exhibit E -Grading Plan Exhibit F -Landscape Plan Exhibit G - DRC Comments, November 6, 2007, January 15, and October 14, 2008 Exhibit H -Noticing of the Story Poles Exhibit I -Resolution No. 02-43 approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2001- 00439 for the development of the initial Master Plan for the church Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-0926 • I-9 • EXHIBIT° A ,.,o i ' _ V ~~~~ nip Zoe' ~ a ~ ~ q~ 7 U W m ~ ~ ` ~1 J~ -l ~'o o ;~ a J iw f1' 1 G~-1~W~_ ~' ~' I' ~~ i. 3AV021`dA3NIA --=-~ EXHI~i1° ~ ;s' ~i i P L 9. s N U W W N i ~i ~-- !-' ~ II ~~ U W N F N • .,, U ~~ ig ~ ~ ~i a S 8 p i a6 ~ '~ ~Ni1 J • a e p ~ ~ a ~ _~ ° ., ~~~ c $ ~ e . - ~~ < ~. $ ae "8g~ ~y 'a v a z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pr U C~ zoo - g . ~~ y EXHIBIT C -,z O O~ 00 O°~O 1 p B~~R~~ ~z . g ° a ~C'U _ 7 U u9 m (< - ~ p oo F~~~ ~ ~ a~Or •~ °~ ! ~ ° LL~~JJ ~ q~ l~aa ,~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ Q { ~ a ~ m~ d~ E e ~ ~ p € 3 ~ ~gg~~9 Fi O ~ ~ o z ~ J S 8 0 ~ s f~~ P 4 E Z c a ,:.. p Bp~s~{ iieGPci ° U LL ~ ~ ~~ l ~i : ~ \ , Y ~ , _ II _ _ ~ V - .. I I .. _~ I _ :a - _ ' o--- ~ i :~ o~ l:~ ~ :~ r--- - ~ l I ~ O,~ R ' z rr ~~ , • ~ ~ ~ ~ \\ ~ J LL ^t @ ~ t, ~ \ ~ •~\ W W J ~ ~~ 1 ,i i O. -~1-} .. ~: r~~ie[~,y y~ ~ O / 6:~ ~ i SIX ~'~, ~ ~~\ Z ~ ~ , ~ ~~ o-- - -- n€' -- ,<<.~~~ ,,,~ ~ ~, :I N ~ __ i :~ ~P~ 4 O~J i !I_:i ~ .~ I ~ \ ~tl I~ ~ jI ~LI' a~_ ~ ~ `q ~/ I o-- -- :-~ ~, , 0 0 ® o o~ o. o u I -13 I • ' • • U ~o ge$ p ~ ~ I~ ~~"=~9~~`ss 'a c=ia= ~ ~ r I~`o~n S BB ~ s8~3 { W 2 0 ~ 3 > ~ a o I J j ~ ~3n JU W m ,°`~~ l 1 ~~ e'~ ~ m a~ ~p~~ z~ 4a ~~~e~ € z~ {~ i ya ~ £e ~ H 14 E 2~F ~~ i4 i; jg§418~ 3 ~E ~ p~ 3ef 3 3 ~ ~iss~2 a ~ ~ ~ w J @ @ P p9 y9y6p€p!( (6 ~ g A C ~ 9i YE}ytl3; y e~${pE5{ig {d~p~ 1 A~ ill ~I ~: d p LL . ~ f:~: ~ N ® O ® O -T ~ 1 ~ 1 p~I -~1 ~ , r a '~ ~~ : ~ ~ - ~_ ~ i a , u la ~ _____ ___________ ______ / _ e _. !~x ------ - ~\ o ~ ~ , ~ ^ wo \ ~~ ~ ~.S~ i I g I ~~ o ~. ~::: ~~J--F- ~ q e = I ~~~ . ~= . ^ Z ... -- ~ a , a 40 5 r Y~ ~~ ~C~~ ~ ~ I~~, E'i _ F. ~' _~ ,~ 6~ _ I I o- ~ J w >W o ~ ~ ~ - V S~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..L ~ LL ~ I_ Ea ~ . ~i o ~ / J (n ~'~ -\~ ~ \ ~ ~ >,~ ~ ~ ~ W m I ~ I\~I ~ ~ 'e ~ .1 { I ~ ~ • __ ~ ~ ~~ I v;nl I ~~t~ ~/ ~ I? Ih III ~ •. .. .I;I ._ c~ ~ ~~ c~~::~~:r- ~ 0'~•2~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ o , ~ ~ .w.~,~ ~ y~VA~..~~~Q ~A.~. II i ~ ~ - I O- 0 / i I \•~ O I -14 • • ~ ~~~ygg 48 yyy@ ex ~~ a czi a ~ ~ `~ ~`i~. ~~ ~ v 'a i o r f ~ fr f W > ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a '~\ @ € ~` ~ 8 8 s 2 e 1 _i > J 3 > ~ o { ~ ~ ~ G fig{ 9 ~i9 yt YE Y G ~ ~ 3 m J V W m - ~~ v m -J ' •~•" I 3 H~f~ 3 3 Iq ~ t E N (") R t § 5 (( ly f ib ~ ~ pp6 p 9P~ b =bp~p g ye FP 2 5 [ '~ ' $§ ge ~ 99 e , qq ~ e 4 ~,_~ ~4 _ ~' I VIII , _ __ yo-- i o--- - O_ I i _ ~~. ~- - :, ~~~ Z ~ ~ ~ Z Z ~,.;~- ~ .i o i . ~,. ~~ ~ Z o ~ ~ ~ o ~ o R o- ~, il Q o- . ii ¢ i ~ i > W > __ X J W "~ i i i W W - J W ~ _~ J LLJ ' 2 2 l a: 'p d'a X ~ :~ - H ° ' ~ H ~ ~ ~ n , ~ ¢ ~ ~ yu w LIdO ~gS• S< O Z - W ~ ~ ~') . ~ lfj'lf]YpA ^ I:i u,~:I 1 ~, ~-~ ~ f U Z ~' U Z R C7 t •., rt. - _ Z ~ i ~ J ~ ~ ~~~' O J t m f ~ m m ~ o-- m a o- ~ 0- ar:~:" - ~ I - ~ ~ ,,;: ,. . ; >:; .. ,> ~. _ t^ <~ '.`t7:_' ~a"? - , o ~ i ., r 0--- il ~ ' Q--- s I - "ti ' s a & I ------ ~., ~. -_ ~ .5"~"~.... ~ S' g~. [3?~ 2y I k ~~ es p S J _ ~Xf-II~IT D U ~p~ ~ R 6~ p C 99 ~?~e3l~ t3 ~ y v a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ° ~,L w >>~ 3 s~ ~dR ~ S ~~ • ~~' p4 5 0 w vi -: ~~ ~ S~6E Q ~~~~~ ~ a e ~(e~ 9 ~~ _ _ _ J U W m ~4n~u, a P 3 ~q `p „ fc BCC !i r ~ > ~ f ~ ~ ' y y o- ~"' N M ®--~~ • ~ 5 ~~ s ' ~ ' i • !o !o o - ®~ ~ sr U n !o R~;c - ~ C7 - o-- S~ _ ~ / ~~° J ~: ~~'~~ gg 6~ nn ~~J ~ 2 2 l ~` P r r z ~; 8th. ~ : ~- ~3' - I ez m %• _ Z I 4 q_ ~- ~~~ i 3 ~ z ` 6 + ~-- - w Q o- ~ o--- ,..~ ~ ~ ~ a 1 z ~~ ~ ,: o--- ~~,~, .; (l 9 i~ is 3 ~ ~ti ~ O I ~ ~~ y ~I . ~ 1 VY +?• ~~ I ~ P R~I: Lf1WT Z 'x W W S • ~ Q i I I ' a - ~ Y ~ f I ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~j L i L v ~ I , _ it e ~ o-- ~ J o--- ~ 'I- h 'I , J ~ ~ ~ ~- m ~ ~ ~ ' m ~-'~ l0 !G I I ~ ' ' - Y p R ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ l`l ~~'~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ B _ ^^^ z Z ~ I ~ ® 'n ~ Z O ~~~ ~ ~c I . ~ a aL"J ~ ' o '~ ~ ~J _ ll:i /-l ~~ ~ ~~ Z p ~.'~ ~~ ~ ¢ -_- ~ ~l 0---- o- E , ~ ~o z ~ m ~ ~ o-- -- o- ~ m a e I °~ p g y i i ~ i~. 9 e /~ I ~l ~ , °~I $' ! a _ ~~ p ' i $ !S 'y S I -16 U ~ ~ ~ ~y~s~R e1 ~ Y U C7 3F A $Q € Q U Q ? ~ o~~.i W '_ w>>~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- Z D ~ J U W m ~ ti Q S' 0 0 : ~ 6 ~ 4 d ~+ N Y R "~ Q Q Q i ~ Q ~ ~ Z Q U' W 2 R R ` P _ W P d ! P 2 ~ I ~ W Q L7 L p p 0 e Q m (9 ~ J ~ V V 4 2 L7 2 .~ Z < Z O ~ O ~ O m' d 4 ~ 3 ~ ~ m' ~ $ ~ 3 `~ 3 s' m ~ o v ~e ~i @@e§ mi h w f ~\ s £p~~ ¢I O_-____~_-_ ~_ ~ ®- _ - ~r • o--- :,.-- o--- o--- ~,-- ®- - • ~F Yy~~ ?e rl __ ^~l ~l ®-- ~--- o-- ~- o--- o- - ~_-__ V ®--- o----- ®------ ~--- ®-- ~--- ~------ + i KggQ ~, W J ~W ~~ S ` O N ~ 6oaP ~~ Z N ~ ~ v : r, i k ~ vUWi m J U W m ~ ~ e, n c} M ' i v y : ~_---__ ` \\ ^i F~ ®- _ _- N ~ - dip J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ i e ° I (- P ® _~ a .. ~ ~ C~ -] M O t 8 - 1 i - L- U ~'6lI I Q 5~k ~ ~ ~~~ , I 1 m ~ fa_ ~ m ~ O J ~ ~ ~ eq °~ m j J '_ [D @ ` o- ~o d,.;.; ~ ®-' ~ _ O- i a~ ~ ~_ ~~IIIIIIIIII ~~ N ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~~ _ ., .. ~ ~ Z ~ o--- -. ~ r ~, ~ ~ - ~. w ~ - Yg ~ 33 o e pl> ~ ' ~-1 - CO ~ .. ~ e ..~ ~ ~ .. f .., ®_ Z o S ~ ~_ ~ r v C s e BEii ~ ; t u - a ~-- ~ , ~ _ a r O ~ -- ~ggI - r q p rn~ ~~I ~ ~W sw - U 6~ fY ~ u~ V' `Y ® = fs O /.., ~ ~D C~' ~ o m J ~ , p] m ~p~ ~~ ~± ~II4 Z o- _ ~~ _ - _:v - Q- - -g' m ~ • s ~s • • I -18 • • • U • ~ °~~eglt U ~~ 9e gg da ~ =® ) ~ [ @ ~ -- o e~ ~a° '~ ~ ~ Q ~ Q 33 ??'' a o ~$ 33 ~ m ~§ G ~ ~ e ~ tw ~ il~ $$ o ' s E > e > e ; ~i a ~ 9 _ I I , ~ i I i ~ i i I . I I p I pp 71 i ~I I 7 j ~ j j I v 1 ~ 4 5 I ~ I ~ Z+-et~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~~ xG~ &2 4 qb p ~ ~a x .'. ~. pgp.I ~ j ~ 6 I V~ I. E # o' E n .. i~ ~ ` a ~.~y '4l n _ 'fir ~w; , ~F f,44 - G6 'eGY ® Q - Z LL ~ d ~s ~~ ~ gg~~ F :~_ "may ~ ,y~~?;,c ~ '-' ,T ~ 3 d~L' ~ ~L I I ' O !- ~ -5 ~® _O f- nM.' .o F ~ ~,. ~. hi,' '~Sr~/.YN ~ ~ ,~ , ., .. _ _ ~ .~~ apI u!1.~ W U1 c I .II. 'Bj W (n p d ~ Ir,:^v ,,ll ~~' ~ V~Y`GC tJ (n ~ s ~ ~ _ USA- - ~"." '~ -_-,~ ' ns !~ --I ~ cn yy ~ y k w e p ~ l q g ~ y ~ { ~~y ~y il '~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ r - ~ O ' O ~ _ ... _. - I o--- j vlHn' ~ _ _ ry ~r uwY•~:Mi ~ m Y . _ f ' ` i~U~ ~ ~ m ~ l 1 li ~ ~ r~r.'f I Y~ ' _ g ~' ~~~ ~. @ I &Eti S 9 O O 6 9 S I ~ ~ ~ ~ p s F (n ~ • ~ H ~ ke f~ p m ~5 .~ _ _ y3y 3 VIII - Y p ~~ ~ m ~~ ~su + ~• ~ ~ m ~& g 9 a a I"~9 • 8~ ??is xQ. ~~[~ ~ ~ ~FpO~v ABZ @f[G ~`s~a~E 3 4 O ,. 8 <<h U W J ~ $ a $ ~~~ ~ ~¢g ~~ m ~ 5 s 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ i a ~ ~ ~ `fig pqe_ a ~~ ~ ~~s~~g~g ~~~~@ P ~-` 3 b¢ ~ ~~[ @ [~ € b Q Q° Beebe e[ rae ~;g q€~€~ a ~68leBt~E$~€@~sB~g:[[F:~:. oo r,e g#!p e5 E i ~ ~3~ a Y ' ~ ~ F5 's3vF iiC ud 6~~ ~~~ Q ~ €eee eeebxt€ia eS[nee.n eF ~ I ~ ~ ~ej~ • ^Q V ~v aQ V O V ~, ~~ gggU^ ~+ e _ ~ JF s j _ I T l s ~~ s~~ e n ~; ~. •~ ~. ~. 8~q •y: i ~, ., gal ~ s~ ~~ 2n ~r E~I"0~~~~ ~ ~i i -zo i -z i • ° ~S°~ o I ~f c ~ xg °~ b Z °~ ~~ ~. qa_.- I g F Y L $ ; =y ? ms`s%ad9 ~~~ ~~ • \~ -i-r-r xy~'rr-~ ~~d ab`dl.~Nln EXHLBII' F ~-22 ~ {( .n _3 ig h '~ z e o a oA~;~ ~d~<a a ~~~~o ~z~~< ~I AA~~e ~~ Wd~`~~ ~ ~ ~ F 4 3 3 I S~~ 4 8 4 4 3 ( I F ~E~E~fd~~ ~ 6 ~~ 99fif91f § 9 9 ~ ~ @ ~aa~;~aaa o 0 §~e 1 s ~~~ e 1 gg e 3 ~ _ ~~~~ ¢~: G ~ ~ 1 6@88 S ~' B g:3~ , ~ ~i~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ;w~ F ~E~ :I I I I I I I I I ~~~ ~ '~~ r"~ ~ ~I ~I ' i ~ & 4 °~ ~ ~ Vm ~ ~ ~°~<~ r SS~~A q_- ~i ~- 9°Bq~qN~ 85py~ 9~ ~ g ~ q~q ~xd a~°~ - ~ ~ ~ d~ ~q2p QI QI Q ~ ~ p 4-~&YU ~ B a ~ s ~ a k'F ~ Sa sBC ~ ~ ~ _ g F 5 { g I I I PB h ~ y i 35a8 r k rL $ de w p [ ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ q . .`.tl ~~ aq$ °~ B ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~' 8~~~ ~~ s ~ a ~~ ~ ° i ~ ~~ $ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F 4 ~ ab~¢ l ~ ~ ffg~~ y ~ < ~ ~ m ~ ~a 3 3 9 3 &&p$5p5 ~ ~~~ p 2 ~ 1 ~~f ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ gg ~~ ~ y3 ~g~f5 4 g 333j ~ fn n - s~ ~ mn ~ ~~ e n ¢ yyB yg @ g g y § Y'g¢2P~2~d6~B~~H~~~ & r ~ ~ p ~~ ~ ~ i~ tl ~~ a ° ~ @a~ ~p ° °~~, ° ~ ~ a~ ~ti~ a ~, ~ r- ~ { t ' ~ ^ _ ~ ~ ~ ~tl a8 a ~ ~ y ~ ~ $p ~ g~3~a ~ 3 O ~ ~ ai` ~ ff4 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ gg b ~ ~~ a ~ 5 m ~~ ~&~e ~ 3 ~~ory3@e_B p [ry~ ~3 s __. ^ N ga 8 YJh 3x~~~i~y~• 0 m 8 D~ ~ 5 ~e~~ ~m ~~~~ yyq p @q y pp g p li~~~C~B¢~~f@ H ' ~ ~ 4 9 @g]aa ; „8 F..Y ~i G~ g s, ~{ ££'p 99 ~L~F?e2~8tl ~ ~ ~ p pp~•¢p.~~a~55#8d@@a ~~§ ~-+ ~ Q ~P~11 W O a sE 3r~E t g ~ ¢ ¢ ¢ ~ e ~ ~ <~ ~ z~ a q pp e ~ $"~ Q ~§§S3~§ i Y y9y7'~yg Y peg~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ i~ €~~ ~ ~ ~Q~9V p~1a ~ y~ Spe~d ~ 3 ~~ea ~ ~ ip ~' ~ss ~ Ep ~€p€9 p~i ~~! !! ..9~i e~ ~pp~@i ~ i @' s v f P 99~pp y FQQ Hestia oqC~ ~ ca <° ~ >"~ a eSp. p ~ p §i~ ~~ F §fP @p a@ e p 9~e~ 8" Epg ggB ~~ ~p g~ r Y~ i ~'f E p~pYYf~ ~~e ¢ ~ y8 S3p~ 9s @ y€E v€~ I ~ ~ [ @ v~g! ~ty iPe CEEE P E~~~ p~ ~S ~ @ ~ ~ ~ p~ () Z" m < ~ ~~> U u ~ p yY 1 ~ ~ yyyy ~~ va 4 p ~q$ a Ri§ ~ 3~ Y y~'4G8 ei~Q~ B g~~§ 3~yp p¢ ~ ° Y6 ggqq ~~tl'@@vp4 @f§~ ! ~ p8~i y ~ ii i p9 p ~a~ ~~F ~~ i i~i ~ 9 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ° q~ pp ~~~~ v"~`~ ~ ~~~ W = yi - ia : 8 3 ! 9 € 9 3 p 3 .. ° ~ ~ c 0] 4 € ~ = § 3 e € ~ } c e e e € e @ F i a a~ ei i 6a 59g~ga av S ~ f Y ', I I43 his -,~' -- - ----- ----- ------- III .- ~z OCLl6 VO'YONOINtl000 OHONtM I ~; I k !io °.s3. g., 3Atl OatlA3NIN LL6L t ~~~ L i. ~~ ~ e - @ ~°c~ d a 3_ q~,• `'~-• ~~F'., f to J p;u S~ FE I HOtlf1H0 AtlM3dll 5~ ~! ~ ~~. ° r w ~65~ ~a~ ~t ~ a a n• o g=:3 I - S9NIQlif18 NOIlV~f1a3 H~afiH~ 1.dM3dll .~ ?~i_ -'' - - - ~ •~4 . iLj~ i i as raa.: Fr`I• _----_--- _.-_.-_____-_-_ -_-.. -. i• 3 _5'1 .~ _._. _. _.-_._-. .4 I~ga '- -- --- Q s W N W w 0 a n w - •' z /, ~. p s'~ U b~~ ~ C,. ~ Q tr .~ t~ r.?' ?O d '.9' i;- '~ ? '~ a it ~; ~~ p a a U j ~ ul n ~Q n iC Q 7_ W 0, ~w [r - 2 L 7Z - < ~ ~~ - ~~ n N 3 w U Q F ..~ 7 t- uWi a i~~a W Qa x~~i.ati~S~ N'~ry~ji•i' 5~1. p E.H,,'~ ~+~ ~ k t~s a U 7 a ~ ~~' ry ~. , K' i Sys:'. • ~ ,,, sr ~"RZ ~JSYS J S.N9 y':. .. 4j ~.-f d.• ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ t ~ n ,w '''.O .ml U Q L O i -.. X Iu z F Z ~,. - , ~e.. r~~.~_ f~~_ a w Q a Q ~° z •~ ;. o F? a Io 0 z a I -24 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Corky Nicholson November 6, 2007 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 -WLC ARCHITECTS -Review of Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of the Lifeway Church project development including an education building, temporary classroom. modules, gymnasium and fellowship hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado - APN: 0208-921-36. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 and Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544. Design Parameters: On September 12, 2007, the Planning Commission directed the applicant to pursue a more complete design presentation for the remaining buildings for the church campus. The applicant is presenting a preliminary concept for Committee feedback. Drawings are attached with an explanation of the building program. More extensive presentation materials will be provided at the meeting. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends providing the applicant with direction and having the applicant return to the Committee with a full presentation of the designs. • Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: (Fletcher, Munoz, Diaz) Staff Planner: Corky Nicholson Also present at the meeting were: Corky Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director; Jim Di Camillo of WLC Architects; Elena Purice of WLC Architects; WLC Architects; Sylvester Mayberry, Lifeway Church; Pastor Chris A Esteves, Lifeway Church; Char Ransom, Lifeway Church. Jim Di Camillo, WLC Architects presented a scale model of the church campus that offered the opportunity to visualize the building arrangement, site orientation particularly in relation to the neighboring downslope homes, building mass and architecture. He highlighted a few features of the design such as the proposed education building that is tucked into the hillside; the fellowship hall (following the removal of the temporary classrooms); and the gym that now reflects a lowered profile. He confirmed that the gym will be placed approximately 15 feet closer to the roadway abutting the slope than the portable classrooms. He commented that the height of the proposed building is about the same as the two story homes previously proposed for the site. He said moving the gym to a different location on the site would produce a fire access problem. Public Comments ~harles Rich, a neighboring resident expressed frustration that the Committee meeting tonight was not advertised to the neighborhood. He complained that it is his understanding that the gymnasium will be E~~~~~~ ~ 125 DRGACTION AGENDA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS November 6, 2007 Paget • built approximately t5 feet closer to the "edge" than the existing portable classrooms and because of the height of the building, will be even more of a visual impact to the homes at the bottom of the slope. He complained that the neighbors have lost their view. He asked if there was going to be a balcony on the fellowship hall. Mr. Rich presented photos to the Committee pointing out the view from the homes. He remarked that he has been given different information on how much the height of the gymnasium has been lowered. He implied that the grading presented to the neighbors prior to construction is different from what has occurred and that the road that leads up to the church is higher than what was presented. He said the path along the wall was not supposed to be there. He complained that the wall that was constructed looks bad from the neighbors' side but looks nice on the church's side. He expressed frustration that Planning Staff has not located the specifics of the materials used for the wall. He responded negatively to offers of mitigation unless they are different to what he has already heard to this point. He remarked that the church has a poor track record in following through. He said the neighbors are concerned about the additional traffic that would be generated if the church renews its application to run a school on site. He expressed concern that the church could have basketball leagues running every night. Corky Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, reported that the current wall was required by the City, however, no specific conditions could be found that dictated the materials to be used. He said the wall was constructed to mitigate glare from headlines of vehicles traveling to and from the church. He reported that overall the slope is being well maintained. He added that the path was required for maintenance purposes. He noted there were four neighborhood meetings held prior to the original approval. He added that the use of the gym was included in the original environmental review and that traffic concerns were considered with that approval. • Pastor Esteves reported that the wall was constructed as it is to properly distribute weight loads on the geo grid related to the building pads and to hold the slopes in place and that it had nothing to do with the cosmetics of the wall facing the neighbors' homes. He said this wall was very costly. He said the church is willing to stucco the neighbors' side or do something to improve the appearance of the wall. He said the pathway was required for emergency and fire access and for maintenance of the slope. He said the pitch of the gym has been lowered as much as possible without losing the usability and intended function of the building as a gym. He said there will be a great deal of space that can be planted with trees and flowers. He commented that if adequate trees are brought in, it will help make the view more benign. He added that the church wants to do what they can to make the neighbors happy but they would also appreciate consideration because of the possible costs. He noted that the church already spent a great deal of money on grading and construction and now they have to spend money on something else. He personally offered to work with Mr. Rich. Mike Diaz, Senior Planner, suggested they consider a re-orientation of the gym so that the shorter dimension of the building faces the slope and the neighbors homes rather than the longer side of the building so as to reduce the massive appearance of the building from the neighbors' homes. Commissioner Munoz commented that the model is helpful. He noted that the Pastor already offered to mitigate the appearance of the wall. He said the architecture seems fine but that he would prefer to see other alternatives. He suggested a possible change in the pad level and/or landscaping to help mitigate the neighbors' view. He said the hill appears higher from the neighbors' homes and that the view is harsh for the neighbors. He said there should be a halfway point and that what he is seeing thus far in compromise is not sufficient. He said he would like to see a landscape plan the next time they come to • the Committee and he would like them to explore more alternatives to take care of the problem. He said Mr. Diaz's suggestion of reorientation of the gym is the type of alternative he would like to have them explore. I -26 DRC ACTION AGENDA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS November 6, 2007 • Page 3 Commissioner Fletcher noted that this meeting is an open meeting but not a public hearing and that it did not need to be advertised. He commented that the way the wall was constructed was not a neighkiorly way of doing it, that it should be split faced on both sides. He suggested the gym building be lowered, not just the pitch and eaves, but the grade of the pad that it will rest upon. He said it appears the grading has changed. He said he would like to see a landscape plan. He suggested they explore the idea of a forested hillside with appropriate trees that do not produce debris when the winds come. He said they would need to have substance and height. He asked if the gym could possibly be moved to the east portion of the site. He added that he wants to see a solution to the appearance of the wall facing the neighbors. He noted that the City does not have a view ordinance. He added that the use of the gym is included in the church's Conditional Use Permit and that if the use became a problem, it would be addressed. • r 1 LJ I -27 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7:20 p.m. Corky Nicholson January 15, 2008 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS -Review of the Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of the Lifeway Church project development including a classroom wing, temporary classroom modules, and amulti-purpose hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado - APN: 0208-921-36. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 and Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544. The above project description has been revised to include a proposed multi-purpose hall, which combines the previously proposed gym and Fellowship Hall into a single, smaller building as shown on the submitted plans. Background: This application was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on November 6, 2007. At that time, the applicant presented a preliminary concept plan, per the direction of the Planning Commission, for the purpose of receiving feedback from the DRC (see Attachment A -Design Review Action Comments dated November 6, 2007). Design Parameters. Please refer to the Project Description dated December 20, 20D7 (Attachment B Staff Comments: Ma'or Issues: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for discussion purposes, which include the revisions that were previously requested by staff and the Committee. The applicant's revisions are in italics: 1. Consider a re-orientation of the gym so that the shorter dimension of the building faces the slope and the neighboring homes to reduce the massive appearance of the building. The applicant is proposing a consolidation of the Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall buildings into a single structure. In the previous proposal, these two functions were provided in separate buildings on iwo levels. In the revised proposal, these buildings are combined into a single Multi-Purpose Hall that would be located on the lower mid-plaza level. Such a revision reduces both the square footage and building mass. 2. It was suggested that a possible change in the pad elevation and/or landscaping would help mitigate the neighbor's view. The applicant is proposing to drop the pad elevation for the proposed Multi-Purpose Hall by approximately 14 feet, and add substantial landscaping in accordance with the submitted Planting Plan. 3. Indicate if the gym can be moved to the east portion of the site Staff believes that the proposed location for the Multi-Purpose Hall, which includes a regulation basketball court, is best suited for their needs in terms of public safety when accommodating • on-site traffic and pedestrian circulation. I -28 DRG ACTION AGENDA DRG2006-00926 -1NLC ARCHITECTS January 15, 2008 Page 2 4. A solution is needed to mitigate the stark appearance of the southerly wall that faces the • neighboring properties. The revised proposal provides for a much greater detail of the landscape and wall treatment along the southerly property line. The area between the wall and the property line is shown on the Proposed Planting Plan with substantial new tree planting; and according to the applicant, the existing wall would receive a stucco finish of color and texture that would match the existing church building. Secondary Issue: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the need for a Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan for the purpose of identifying the extent of grading that would occur to accommodate the new Multi-Purpose Hall. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the proposed improvements provided that the applicant submits a Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan for staffs review and approval prior to the scheduling of the required Planning Commission hearing on the applicant's Conditional Use Permit proposal. Desian Review Committee Action: Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Corky Nicholson • Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director, gave a brief overview and stated that this is the Church's proposal for the final phases of their development. He reviewed the overall design and stated that this meeting is to consider their proposed changes that address the concerns previously expressed. Jim DiCamillo WLC Architects, presented a material sample board, landscape plan and a model indicating the changes. He commented that they do not anticipate any traffic issues. He said they held a neighborhood meeting one week ago. He noted that they have combined the fellowship hall and gymnasium uses into one building to help mitigate the controversy.. He said the building reduces their square footage by about 2,000 square feet; the parapet height has been lowered; the building has been dropped by about 15 feet; and new open spaces have been created. He added that they have significantly increased the landscaping to the inside and outside areas of the wall. He presented a photo taken from the corner of Zircon and Balsa. He remarked that the building mass tends to "fade away' visually the closer it is viewed from the homes. He said one would not be able to see into the backyards below from the church property above. An unidentified neighbor asked for a photo taken from the north side looking south because he believed that the building would block the view, particularly the tower. Commissioner Munoz remarked that if one stands directly behind the steeple it would block the view. He noted that Rancho Cucamonga does not have "view rights" and that the church is trying to coin=_ halfway (with compromise). He reiterated the proposed improvements and said that it is greatly improved from the proposals of November and December and that they have done much to mitigate the neighbors • concerns. I ~29 DRG ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS January 15, 2008 Page 3 • Mr. Rich asked if a traffic study would be performed. Mr. DiCamillo said that this development does not require it; it would be required if the school was still ' part of the proposal. Commissioner Munoz added that if the school was proposed there would also be the Conditional Use Permit for the school that would be an added protection. Mr. Rich retorted that the church is planning to run a school. Chairman Stewart reiterated that it is not part of their proposal at this time and is not on the table for discussion this evening. Mr. Rich complained that the building is only 8 feet lower and only 7 feet lower than what he was told last time. Mr. Nicholson said they are going by the approved grading plan. Mr. Rich claimed the building is higher than that. Mr. Nicholson stated that he and Mathew Addington spent two hours explaining the grading plans to Mr. Rich and that the plans are signed and stamped by a registered engineer. • Mr. Rich complained that th=_ information he has asked for has not been provided and he cannot confirm what he has been told. Mr. DiCamillo offered to meet with Mr. Rich to review and discuss the issue. Mr. Rich indicated he does not believe the site is built according to plan and that he was told the road would be no higher visually than the wall at the top. Mr. Nicholson said there is some variation from the high to low points. Chairman Stewart asked for the record to reflect a 5 minute time limit on comments for the remainder of the project review because of the argumentative dialogue. George Guiders, a neighbor, stated that some cities require a "silhouette" or "story poles" of the proposed building to give neighbors an idea of the height of the proposed structures. He said they are shot by a surveyor and left up for a week or two; a notice is sent to the neighbors to look at it. He said it is a minimal cost. He expressed concern that the block wall was built with the split face side facing the church rather than the neighbors' property. He asked if decoration could be done and if the wall will continue to the east boundary line. He asked about drainage and a V-ditch. Mr. Rich questioned the use of sandbags along a portion of the southerly slope Mr. Nicholson said the sandbags are required. Pastor Esteves said that the sandbags would be removed when the V-ditch is done. 130 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS January 15, 2008 Page 4 Mr. Nicholson said when the re o • the "goat farm" portion of the y ro ceiv_ their approvals, the existing wall would not be extended. He said P P-rty will not be altered. Wanda Knight, a resident, said she thought the sight poles are a good idea. Mr. Rich continued to complain that the sandbags were still there last Saturday and that he could not the neighbors. trust what anyone tells him because the path and wall were built differently than what was proposed to Mr. Rich continued to contend that he was unsure the development so far was built according to plan and that the computer generated photos being presented by the architect my not be trustworthy. Mr. DiCamillo remarked that this technology is as accurate as it gets. He noted that it is part of the proposal to "dress up" the existing wall with stucco. Mr. Guiders suggested they "break up" the wall with a pilaster treatment. Mr. DiCamillo commented that it might draw even more attention to it and would not accomplish the goal of visually minimizing the wall. He said they would be happy to do the story poles. Pastor Esteves said they have taken 4-6 months, Have taken the advice and de said the are now almost 3,000 s y quare feet smaller that compromises the ultimate visionhofrtheachur hp He said the changes will require them to re-do all of their electrical that was alread the master plan. He said this is costing hundreds of thousands of dollars more, and he would like his • church membership to know that their wishes have also been considered and thatpthen accordance to they can; they too are "a neighbor". y have done all Commissioner Munoz said the church has gone to great lengths to accommodate and there is no way the hill will disappear but that they have done much to mitigate the visual impacts. He noted that when he first saw the a mitigate. He said process and that whe A dev„lopment and the proposal he knew the th„r it is 11 or 12 feet difference is not relevant. He notedah Po poles and they have mitigated as much as 9o through this land o~.a~ner; he filed plans that are within the Code le and nothin Y agreed to story this. He adde g mor„ can be done without hurting the Chairman Stewart remarked that the parties came d that he hoped the neighbors can live with very acceptable and recomme together and the result is su erb. nded the revised plans be forwarded to the Planning Comm ss o tl it is now Mr. Nicholson added that the recommendation be conditioned upon submittal of new concA and drainage plans along with the erection of story poles. ..ptual grading Mr. DiCamillo asked for direction on the protocol for the story poles because he would later be challenged. was concerned the result Mr. Nicholson suggested they be erected and remain up for at least two weeks and that it be done by a civil engineer. He noted this is for height purposes only. Commissioner Munoz cautioned the neighbors that the story poles do not determine or no go" it is only a reference point. • if the project is "a go 131 DR C ACTION AGENDA DR C2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS January 15, 2008 Pages • Mr. Nicholson remarked that such poles were used for years before computer graphics and that the computer generated photos are a much better representation because the poles only reflect a representation of the height and not building mass. Mr. Di Camillo asked if a letter would be sent to the neighbors. Mr. P,ich wanted additional reference points to show how close the buildings would be to their property. Commissioner Munoz said it would not show that. Chairman Stewart agreed to the proposal. r 1 L_J • 132 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Corkran Nicholson October 14, 2008 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 -WLC ARCHITECTS - A review of the Master Phasing Plan for remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development including a class room wing, temporary classroom modules and multi-purpose hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle de Prado - APN: 0208-921-36. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 and Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544. On April 24, 2002, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The planner will provide an oral presentation and plans at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Corkran Nicholson Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly • Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director gave a brief introduction and noted that the last time the project was reviewed was on January 15, 2008. He invited the architect to make a short presentation regarding the change on the roof design. Jim Di Camillo of WLC Architects noted that there are now two buildings proposed; the Education Wing and the Multi-Purpose Hall with no changes to the Education Wing. He noted that they erected story poles on many locations of the site. He said there was some concern of the height of the ridgeline of the building and so to address the concern, they changed the design of the roof, eliminating the ridge which lowered the overall height of the building. He said that was the intent of the story poles, to give people the impression as to how the building would appear. He said everything else stayed the same. Mr. Nicholson noted a sheet that makes the comparison of the old plan to that of the revised plans; Sheet AB5.3 indicates the resulting change in the reduction of the building mass. Commissioner Wimberly noted a significant reduction in mass. Mr. Di Camillo commented that the change makes the building appear lower from only from some perspectives. Mr Nicholson invited the one neighbor in attendance to comment. Charles Rich, 8930 Balsa Avenue, said it is true the building height is lower but only to meet the • City Code requirement of 30 feet and no more than that. He said that he believes there is a pitch to the roof. I ~33 Mr. Nicholson clarified that there is a slight pitch to the roof for drainage but that they added a • parapet to screen that. Mr. Rich stated that not all of the Commissioners came to view the story poles from his backyard. He said the project to the north of his and the neighbors yard (southerly slope of the church property) creates a 30-40 foot "wall." He said because of the grading the project is now lower on the bottom and higher on top. He said it does not make sense to totally destroy the homes to spread the wealth around. He said it is unfortunate that not all the neighbors received the information regarding the meeting this evening and he did not know why. He said it is no secret they are planning on building a school. He said almost everyone that has looked at this agrees that it never should have been approved the way it was approved. He said because it was approved, you have to approve the second phase. He said you are approving an education building that is planned to be a school and when a plan is presented for a school, it will be approved for a school. He said there are 11 large rooms. He added that the property is not fit to be a school and a lot of the neighbors have a concern about that. He said a dead tree has been there for a year. He said the retaining wall the church built seeps (his neighbor's property). He said it used to be a wooden fence but now it seeps and has algae growing on it and is a mess. He said he pointed it out to Trang Hyung (Building Official) and Mahdi Aluzri, (DCM/Community Development). He claimed the neighbor has complained and nothing has been done to his knowledge. Commissioner Munoz confirmed with Mr. Rich that he had completed his comments. He noted the comment about the pitch of the main building. He asked staff to comment on the seeping wall. Mr. Nicholson said he is aware of the wall condition and noted that the staff report for the • October 22, 2008 Planning Commission meeting notes a condition stipulating that the church will be responsible for the maintenance and function of all the walls. He added that the church and the architect have been very willing to look into these matters and correct what issues may exist. He noted that Mr. Rich commented on the grading. He reported that on the southerly portion of the site, 19 feet of fill was added when the site was originally graded. He said Planning is now far more sensitive to these infill concerns than when the original proposal was presented. He said it is difficult to say what would be recommended at this time. He said that from working with the church on the original proposal, the plans have changed, that originally there was to be a gym and fellowship hall (two separate buildings), with the gym located at the current location/elevation of the modular trailers. He said they have tried to mitigate the infill by lowering the building pad 14 feet. He noted that if the original 19 feet of infill is considered, the difference between the 19 feet and 14 feet is a building pad elevation of 5 feet above the natural grade prior to development. He said that the extent of the lowered pad is consistent with the interior plaza area which will serve as access to the new Multi-Purpose Building. He noted that the re-design consolidated the gym and fellowship hall into one building with a net reduction of approximately 2,000 square feet. He said the new roof design lessens the building mass as well. He said Staff is conditioning (provided the protect is approved) additional landscaping, stucco finish to the southerly wall and the installation of 6-foot high wrought iron fencing along the southerly perimeter of the parking lot (for added security). He commented that these are substantial improvements. He said this approval has nothing to do with the past approvals. He said this re-design has been to the DRC three times over the course of 6-7 months with more than '/: dozen revisions to mitigate the impacts on the adjacent property owners. He responded to Mr. Rich's comment about only some of the neighbors being invited to this meeting. ,He • reported that the property owners most affected by the project were invited and that although I34 • this meeting is not a public hearing, staff wanted to give them the opportunity to attend. He added that the Planning Commission Meeting on October 22, 2008 will provide a specific, detailed staff report for a public hearing. He said that it has been fully advertised and all property owners within a 660-foot radius from the exterior property lines have been noticed. Mr. Nicholson responded to the comment about the church operating a school. He noted that prior to the January 15, 2008, meeting the Commission considered the phasing plan and their request for a school. The Commission heard the concerns of the neighbors and said that there was not enough information to support approval of a school use, that further environmental clearance, a traffic study and information from the other schools in the area was needed as well as additional staff review. Therefore, the church withdrew the application for the school use and asked that no further phases be considered. The Commission directed that their review would be through the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) process. The staff report for the upcoming meeting indicates there will not be a school and that he has a statement from the church detailing what is proposed for the Classroom Wing and the uses for those rooms that include meeting rooms and a youth worship area. He confirmed that upon completion of the Classroom Wing and prior to the Multi-Purpose room being built, the modular units must be removed from the site Commissioner Munoz asked what would occur if the church wanted to establish plans for a school at a later time. Mr. Nicholson said they would be required to go through a new CUP process with environmental clearance, a traffic study and with input from the surrounding area schools. He said there are many issues that this proposal does not even address. He said there is no means for them to do that without going through the process. • Commissioner Munoz asked the applicant if they are aware of the condition of the wall maintenance and of the seeping wall and if they can accept the condition regarding its maintenance. Pastor Esteves stated they have already worked out this concern with the affected neighbor months ago. Commissioner Munoz summarized the concerns, the wall issue, plans for a school, seepage, the building height, the slope, maintenance, enhanced landscaping, stucco on the wall, security fenang for the parking area, etc. He said it is not a public hearing and the applicants are present to tell them about the changes. He stated he appreciated Mr. Rich's input and it is difficult situation for the neighbors and for the church to proceed with what they believe their mission to be. He said the DRC has dealt with this in a fair, drawn out and specific manner, that they have looked at everything, the building height, the mass, and they put up story poles to help the neighbors understand what the massing would look like and that the church changed their plans in good faith. He noted the story poles went up at great expense and that the church has gone further and with their new plans reduced the mass of the building closest to the neighbors by nearly one third. He said he believes the church has bent over backwards; it is a tough problem just short of putting the hill back the way it was 10 years ago. He said he did not believe any other solution would work here He said he recommends the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented. He reiterated that this meeting is not a public hearing, but that was his opinion and he deferred to Commissioner Wimberly for comment. • Commissioner Wimberly concurred with all of Commissioner Munoz' comments and added that he felt the cooperation received from the applicant, their product, what they have done and their 135 attempt to mitigate all that is out there is significant. He concurred with moving the project • forward to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Munoz recommended the project move forward, that he would not debate the issue further but invited further comment from Mr. Rich. Mr. Rich reiterated they do not maintain things now, and that nothing gets done unless the neighbors complain either on the church side or the City's side. He said the lights were getting blocked, issues with landscaping being put in, gravel, sandbags and tree removal. He said he has no assurance they will do anything and he cited old concerns regarding sandbags, lights and the wall maintenance. He said the stucco treatment on the wall is a new wrinkle and that no one talked to the neighbors about it, that they won't take care of it and that he did not know if the neighbors want that. He insisted it would not be taken care of and that the church did not work with the neighbors as directed by the Commission. He said they did not work with them at all. He said they just came to us and told us what they want to do and they asked for their approval. He maintained the building could be moved to the other side of the property. He said the building is now compacted and on top of them and the height is higher than the City Code and it does not help them. He said there is a lack of working with the neighbors on their part (church) and the City. Commissioner Munoz said he appreciates the church working with the City. Jim Di Camillo said his company has done work for the City for 25 years and that this project is an example of the process working. He said the applicant has made numerous changes. He said the intent is to improve the project and there has been much compromise on the part of the church. He said staff has done a great job. He said it is an example of a problem being • resolved with people working together. Pastor Esteves thanked staff on behalf of the church Mr. Rich said it would be impossible for him to be at that meeting (October 22, 2008). • I-36 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor DONALD J. KUR'rH, M.D. A~ayor Pro Tem L. DENNIS MICHAEL Councilmemberr REa CiIyTIERRE7_ SAM SVAGNOLO DIANE WILLIAMS Crty Manager JACK LAM, AICP RANCHO CUCAMONGA May 13, 2008 0208-592-03 Jonathan Mark & Lynette S. Wilson 8933 Ironwood Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: LIFEWAY CHURCH LINE OF SIGHT "STORY POLES" Dear Property Owner, The Planning Department staff, in concert with the direction of the Design Review Committee, has been performing a review of the Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of the Lifeway Church project development including a classroom wing, temporary classroom modules, and amulti-purpose hall on 5.03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue (.APN: 0208-921-36). • As a courtesy, and per the direction of the Design Review Committee, Lifeway Church will be erecting 'story poles" on their church property. Story pules a~A simply PVC poles erected at precise locations on the subject property for the purpose of providing precise vertical measurements. Such poles are sometimes used by the construction industry-to help give visual guidance as to how the proposed height of a future permanent structure may appear from the surrounding properties. The poles will not aide in giving perspective of the mass of a future building but should be helpful to neighboring residents as to how high a building may appear from their own home/property. Lifeway Church plans to erect the poles within the week of May 12-16 and they will remain on the property for a minimum of two weeks time following the installation of the poles. Included with this letter is a map that denotes the precise location and elevation of each pole site (indicated with yellow dots) as well as the vertical elevation for the top of each pole. Should you have questions or concerns about the story poles, please feel free to contact Elena Purice, Senior Architect with W LC Architects, at (909) 987-0909. Sincerely, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~ ~~ Corkran W. Nicholson Assistant Planning Director • CN\ma ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ • Rancho Cucvnonyn 374 91729-0807 • Tel 909-477-2700 • Fax 909-477-2849 • www.aryofrc us • • ~ 'P a 00 ff~~ ~~ V -~_._ AM Q , b b y, ; O O !~~( M N yl~p R .~ . > ~~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ n - - sr-.~r '-aa ~ ~ 7' e n ~~~ a~d\\ ~~~~a s~ ~. V/NE YARD ~.~ 8 I ~ ~ j I ~ f ~ ~ I1I }- O 8 ~ i '1 ,, ~~ I l l ~ \ A VENUE F1+00 JI~G7 ~ ~ __ - f ___ _~ I~ II 1 ~~ I~ ~~ ~! 8 ~' _ i ~ 1 I I - - H 8 `~ OOA '•1 ~_ ~g '~ ~ ~~ ~ 8; ^~ O ~ ~, ~ \ 1~~ . ~ ~ ^'' ~ ~C ._~ a,, i ~~ ~g Za ~o ~~ z t A V/L A ~A VENUE ACV11'1pT SM Il~ j ~ ~ • RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH MASTER PLAN, INCLUDING A SANCTUARY, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES, A GYMNASIUM, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES, AND STORAGE ON 5.03 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 208-921-36. A. Recitals. 1. Lifeway Church filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of April 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 24, 2002, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado, with a street frontage of approximately 286 feet along Vneyard Avenue, and an approximate lot depth of 720 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. The property to the north, south, and east of the subject site is zoned Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and the property to the west is zoned Open Space (existing Red Hill Park); and c. The application contemplates the immediate construction of 19,415 square feet of sanctuary, administrative offices, storage on-site, and master planned future development of another 21,900 square feet of building space for use as an educational center, a fellowship hall, and a gymnasium; and d. The property has a significant slope from west to east. The proposed project and grading concept contemplates the use of on-site retaining walls in the east parking lot. Development • of the parking lot will require construction of retaining walls of up to 15 feet in height. ~~~~~'~ ~ I-39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. d. The design of the project is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans sand wildlife or their habitat. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: • a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study prepared therefore reFlect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project, which are listed below as Conditions of Approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the Califomia Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • I -40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 • Page 3 Planning Division 1) Light fixtures shall be constructed at a maximum height of 15 feet (to include pedestal), and shall be shielded and directed away from residential areas. A detailed Lighting Plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be prepared prior to issuance of building permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from adjoining properties. 2) Additional landscaping and trees shall be provided along the south end of the property to screen the drive aisle along the south property line and the proposed parking lot in Phase 1, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) All future building pads and parking areas shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the Landscape and Irrigation Plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 5) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or residences, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the City Planner for consideration and possible termination of the use. 6) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by, the City Planner, prior to installation. 7) The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for each building proposed in Phases 2, 3, and 4 shall be subject to separate Development Review process. 8) All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy growing condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. 9) This approval is for the operation of a church and office and does not include a daycare or private K-12 school. 10) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 11) Lifeway Church shall not use Red Hill Park parking lots fortheirparking. • 12) The applicant shall include a landscape planter in place of proposed hardscape at the top of the north retaining wall located in the east parking lot. I -41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 4 13) The applicant shall add a detail cap at the top of the stacked stone pilasters proposed on the retaining walls located in the east parking lot, subject to City Planner review and approval. 14) The applicant shall provide a 6-foot high decorative wall (to match the proposed east parking lot retaining walls) along the southern end of the south drive aisle, terminating at first parking stall of the east parking lot to screen on-site vehicular traffic light glare and noise from existing single-family residences to the south. 15) Reduce the proposed grade from 2 percent to 1 percent at the southeast comer of the property to eliminate the necessity of a single large retaining wall, and incorporate terraced retaining walls, subject to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Engineering Division 1) Missing improvements along Vineyard Avenue shall be installed including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, street trees, signing, striping, drive approaches, etc., and as required. Vineyard Avenue is a City 'Collector Street.' 2) Calle del Prado cul-de-sac shall be fully constructed with curb and • gutter on the north side, curb and gutter and sidewalk on the south side, drive approach, streetlights, street trees, signing, striping, etc., in accordance with City "Local Cul-de-Sac," 36 feet curb to curb, and a 60-foot right-of-way. Dedication of right-of-way is required (30 feet from the existing centerline to southerly right-of-way). The cul-de-sac needs to utilize the existing right-of-way. 3) Water runoff from Calle del Prado will not be allowed to drain through the driveway to the parking lot. 4) Commercial driveways on Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado shall be 35 feet minimum per City standard. 5) Overlay Calle del Prado 0.10-foot minimum, including the north side of the street as directed by the City Engineer. 6) Complete the north side curb and gutter of Calle del Prado with the phased development for the gymnasium or the education building, whichever comes first. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent • (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. I-02 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH • April 24, 2002 Page 5 2) Vineyard Avenue and Calle del Prado shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~a emissions. 5) The construction contractor shall select the construction equipment used on-site based on low-emission factors and high-energy efficiency. The construction contractor shall ensure the construction Grading Plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 6) The contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. • 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut of equipment when not in use. Norse 1) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 2) The project contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 3) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise, and the noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all phases of project construction. 4) During all phases of project construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday. No construction shall occur on Sundays and public holidays. • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. I ~43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 02-43 CUP DRC2001-00439 - LIFEWAY CHURCH April 24, 2002 Page 6 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2002. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY / ' Rich Macias, Vice Chairman ATTEST: rad Bull cretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of April 2002, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE MCNIEL, TOLSTOY • • 1 -44 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2001-00439/DRC2001-00444 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I ~45 Mitigation Monitoring Program Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible Ciiy department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies iF compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for Ciry staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I:\FINAL\CEQA\MMP Forrn-rev.v.Ptl • • 146 • r1 u I-' a r 0 LJ r Z //I-/~ V/ J Y U W 2 U Z O H Z Z O Q ~"' L~ R V "Q ~ Q R Q 0 z a d ~ _ a y w (n V ,d l6 O :-. c ~ >._~ M;~ , ,;, ~ ~'~ ` , ~ ~( i lsS :.. : ' 6 ~: {~[ . M ,:44 `. ` A! ~~ yp N N ~ 3 ~ y CC N N N N N ~9 " „vy;{' < Y t~ ~~- ` ~ ' n i x~' ~n l ~`~ ~~' • ~ ~ s ~~~ i; tom{: F?4 ~ = ?qz s ~ ~~ ~ , ~~ r R iy ;;~ ~;~,; a a a a a a U- ~ ~ Q a j ~,.' x ' ' N N N y y N N ~'N .~ m C m C 1 ~1J! ~~ m m m m m m m .~i~" m m ' ~ ~ f ~ u ~ ~ `o `o `o o `o `o `o ~i!'s:~~ d c c m c ti~ ~ 3 v 3 N 3 v 3 v 3 3 ; db"{{at; ld~ ~ x o ~y ~ N o ~\ y m N N ~ y y N N N N ' ' v ' y pp v m y~ y T=«i ~~ F O m N O m m 1~ d ~ ~ ~ (Y ~ ~ :' j Z 6 C Z O- C Y £& v ~'LM r4L ~~~~ ~• ~d5i~ M1/ ~~ V' ~: p,4 ^h. ~ " ~ ~ F ~ H:~YA`l~ U U U U m U m :.ay U U ~ ~~T ~~ ~ ; ~ze'n~+ ~,~~ ?z ~~ , w , £~ m C ~_j~t~,~'_~~,y ~' .i~^ _ O N~ m y O N C 0 D N OI ~ A ;rr N J N~ .y `i c v m Z` c m ~~ J v m E 2 v ~ E a v 3 a y y ti;`: a L 5 a ~~ ~ > p( vD J U _ n am ' n m E `~"~ or o m '„ ~ ° ~~ o N ~Cm N N D" h o OC ~~- S >. NNSQJ O CJ a ~' E 3 OC NN ~ 7rh d = voE m N °' v nz ~m c c v m °O °~t 2 oQ °1 u W v d vaDin c E v - o E v . ±~ ~ .'o0 ~ 3 o E a o m m ~r J 2~ c m~ o .~'~~' v` ° r Qw v a v v~v 3N ~L o~ y ~~ _ ~'' vy E d ~' _ m J ~ _ d . C a O _ 3 +,v ai ~} v m D_ ~ T - N ` t O 3 N N v N N O toL C L 4 ? C> y' 000 L~ ou n Ndo mc m v3 a's mvE N m O O v O N C N N `-U ~ J O U y U 3~,. m m U y '~~ 'e O U v Q n -O f9 c mo„ O c° - S] o f D v v c G o om ~ `o c Y 3:r-.# ~, o c v ~ o - ~ E ,, ,~ U o v_ n c g v r. L,i m m ~• 3 ~ m co Ja °-~ m._oEc v ~ :r<}rv; oym m ->~ i L ~ 9 U'y-i n N D_ C d N E U pl D °1 N v N m t'cfR.', ' ' m C rC ° 2 m Y i j ' __ c 3 3 m v m J~ ~ T ~- E m o v U? o 0~ v . N C 3 N N o y ~ "~i~p ~ :: c ~>p u ~ - 3 m m . L U m C n j 0 U U p m N m- d U N . 5 P A A d n ^Fea~ v~ C m a N O D u LE d m O ~c v c = ~n m E ~: ',€_-, ~ o.m . v m .Q dUo C D m mtvE n c~ N U nc ° C O N D N °D C'E m m~ C ul ~m' -''r'`.: = C D N :~~~c O U ud g m °c ..~. n 'o ^=+~~. +}~ ~ aN m °:n ~_ o C d ~ o ~ N L n `o - m E a om d L N m n nd O L o mai n J `" t;l.~1: ~~a L O n c p n !f.% ~ m L C > 3 J N D O~ n ` v F' ~ 'O C U 3 j D i~ -•T O n >. y 6 U n IQ:' a n N C W d~ - O N- N N n~ T a ~ N ~ N u U - rt i4~ : O p" N OC N ^,~ 57;~ ~Y m> o o ~- ~ O m J m -o m y °- v n ~ o. ~ o c c m .. o o ~ c o f O c c c o ~- Y • Gf: ( " ` m ~ o~ Ol .p ~ n V aua N n ~ `o T O U C y v y v -o E L E a o y .` o D v D n G o a o n c . N: r, m o. ~ N U a J v ~~b; ~ . _~ E c u n w m~ ~ ~ s v co _ L w~ m= a c JQ r- t "O;: J o 5 m t .E .o Q~ -' v v ~ n m D U N N U L OI f- J N C~ 3 N F- N H d 3 ' Z., (J U 3 E ~ N O- I -47 e v Df 0) C C O a N N (f N (~ N C ~ O C.O. O N N N N d d C 6 N d C 6 O N N O N N Z o e Z a U U a a U U N O 1. a E d N o_ E y O C U C D J C 0 N d D O U 6 U O J N 2 O J a OJ U ~ NL ` - DU O U O L O Q N ~ a ~ N n ~ ~ o v y c v 3 y E c y~ o 0 0 . o ~ 0 ~ ~ - ~ U N 6 U O U N D ' U -' N ~ ry O C C U b y O ~p p1 N C a j U ya d o0 ~ vL Z o~~v U ~ v v J~ ~ m m v a ~ d N 6 o D ~ a O-U ~ J _ N C .L_. C W D N C L L~ ~ v N N O~~ O L - d~ L U N U C¢ c m y n v d -N ° E >. ' u 3m ~' =voa ° v w ',. ~'- ._ ~ ~ c .o ~ o F- S C -O O N C E N N C O A ~~ d a N_ Y (.~ d L U O T d Y s4.r, b1 .Y O • ~ d V .hc`-~`; ~ n ' `'; c P' m ~ n J , ,~ , k:~ IL o ~ U U e '~ O Y J ~ O . J, C = D m ` p C _ '`~~~` o y m ~ m . :9~=: ~ a C t m p d O q~_ O i O O O ~ a O "~ 5' -,- : K a ~ (7 U Y D v _ ~ U ~ a a a o p .NT O ` O O > > c v m L i C :Oi y L t L t n _ m O . _ 'aU{: 2i `Y ~ ~ rn K > m 4 A.. ,'N~a ~ N M 'C ~h (O :~;y,: S~ I i. ~ ~ j ~s y C ~~ J N a yy iF~ t:.~- N p1 7vyd ~~~~ ~ ~ N ~~µ'' ~`. ~ > O O ~ .~ ~ S,~,tify Q O p A~~~ J ~ ~. N C n (' s*.D c E ?'~ ~ tl U a 'E ~~ T U D_ i 6 r'yri N ~ Y U ~ ~ g ¢ v v 4 p d m U m N 4o N L C m ~ ~y C {pL~ O 1 O d v m ~ 1y+ ~ ~ ~~~ Q m U O ~;,•.. 4 h. ~ ~M1' 4 C cz,rs E ~y }: 4 ?S. o ~ 0 _ FN4:' N C U ~CS$ ~ -01; U ` C . °'' m v m ~j o ~ : Z o v ~' ~ U o n ~ \C(~ W F- L j O C (p F'~~ L 110:i .r O O U O ~o~ ~~ Q a m U U W ~..., L~{°-,~j } ice.: N C O -~~ m m v ~`-~o ~'~_ o :. k, ivy U ~ y.y~; , d ~~"i ~ C > w `3', U d N d pi C Sj`CY''. d •:OC D C OI OI 'y N ~ ~ d N C : ~'~`- w m o v a D a .m id? p .d, O o m 'V o c v a y ` ~ ~ ~d>'c i^~ ~ w v E g U _o ~ ~ E f A o~ o~ syr ~CF p ~- c W ~ a u L U ',.'.0,. U D D ._ _o ~ `•, a' ~ U U m d LL -.y,~ ~ . d,i ~ j a w 0 0 0 . K: U U U m d LL • • I I -48 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2001-00439 41,300 SQUARE FOOT SANCTUARY, EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES, GYMNASIUM, AND SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES APPLICANT: LIFEWAY CHURCH LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINEYARD AVENUE AND CALLE DEL PRADO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, . Development Code regulations. ' Completion Date -~-~- -~-~. -/-/ -/-/ SC-02-02 I -49 Protect No. DRC2001-00439 Comolehon Date 2. Prior to any use of the protect site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 12. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 13. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. D. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. SC-02-02 -/-/- -/-/- • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I -50 Protect No. DRC2001-00439 Completion Date E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) • 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long- When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet a_nd shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 5. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. 6. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. F. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home • landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.06.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisYs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building'. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope • shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. -/-/ _/_! -/- -/-/- -/- - -/-/- -/-/. -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-02-02 3 I -51 Protect No DRC2001-00439 Comoletion Date 7. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 8. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. G. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. H. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $ 719.00 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay far City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forteit. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; SC-02-02 / / / / / / / / / / -/-J- • _/_/_ • / / -/-/- • I ~52 Protect No DRC2001-00439 Completion Date d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and • size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Division Project Number (i.e., TT #, CUP #, DR #, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils _/_/_ report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. -/-/- 4. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation -/-/- coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by -/-/- the Building and Safety Division. K. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be -/-/- marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, • ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or _/_/_ addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Division prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation -/-/- and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday -/-/- through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public -/-/- counter). L. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for the property line clearances -/-/- considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separation(s). -/-/- 3. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino -/-/- Envirorimental Health Services prior to issuance of building permits. • 4. Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with UBC -/-/- Table 5-A. SC-02-02 5 I ~53 Project No DRC2001-00439 Completion Date 5. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with UBC Table 5-A 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with UBC Table 5-A. 7. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with UBC Section 906. 8. Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. M. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 5. In hillside areas, residential developments shall be graded and constructed consistent with the standards contained in the Hillside Development Regulations Section 17.24.070. 6. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 total feet on Calle del Prado (South side right-of-way) 2. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. O. Street Improvements 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Sitle- Drive Streel Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Dther Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail Calle del Prado X X X X X X Vine and Avenue X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item SC-02-02 6 / / _/-/- • / / / / -~-~- / / / / -/-/- / / • _/-~. / / L I -54 Project No. DRC2001-00439 Comoletion Date 2. Improvement Plans and Construction: • a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion 'of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 3. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in • accordance with the City's street tree program. 4. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. SEE ATTACHED STREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM. P. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits • in the case of all other residential projects. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- ~-/- -/_/ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- SC-02-02 I -55 Protect No. DRC2001-00439 Completion Date R. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for ~_/_ • all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. _/_/_ These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, _/_/_ with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. _/_/_ T. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. _/_/_ 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are _/_/_ within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. _/_/_ 4. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal _/_/_ • gates, or alarmed. U. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the _/_/_ police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed due to a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24- hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. V. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be _/_/_ lifted from frame or track in any manner. W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for _/_/_ nighttime visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • sC-oz-o2 8 I -56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION TREET TREE REQUIREMENT FORM DATE: 11/6/01 T0: HENRY MURAKOSHI, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER COMMENTS PREPARED BY: PROJECT: DRC2001-00439 LAST UPDATED 8/27 JANELL DAVIS, CONTRACT LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECKER LOCATION: VINEYARD &CALLE DEL PRADO DESIGN NOTES: 1. STREET TREES ON NEW STREETS ARE TO BE SELECTED FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST, BASED UPON AVAILABLE PLANTING AREA (TYPICALLY BETWEEN BACK-OF-CURB AND THE SIDEWALK). ESTABLISHED STREETS SHOULD ALREADY HAVE DESIGNATED TREE SPECIES. CONTACT LAURA BONACCORSI AT 909-477-2740, EXT 4023 FOR INFORMATION. 2. STREET TREES ARE TO BE SHOWN ON STREET OR OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS SIGNED BYTHE CITY ENGINEER, AND CONSTRUCTED PER THE SAME. 3. STREET TREES SHOWN ON PLANNING DIVISION SUBMITTALS ARE CONCEPTUAL ONLY 4. INTERIOR STREETS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SELECT DECIDUOUS TREES FOR EAST-WEST STREETS AND EVERGREEN TREES FOR NORTH-SOUTH STREETS FROM THE CITY'S APPROVED STREET TREE LIST. WIND-PRONE AREAS MAY BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE A MORE DECIDUOUS PALETTE. 5. INDICATED SPACINGS AND SIZES ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY-MAINTAINED TREES ONLY. WHERE THE TREE CONCEPT GOES BEYOND AREAS OF INFLUENCE NEAR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND/OR ANY CITY MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, SPACINGS AND SIZES WILL BE PER THE ON-SITE PLANS APPROVED BYTHE PLANNING DIVISION. ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE PLANS SHALL BE COORDINATED. ~. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE LEGEND AND NOTES INDICATED BELOW. IN SOME CASES, WHEN DETAILS ABOUT PARKWAY SIZES OR UTILITIES ARE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF CONDITIONING, OPTIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR VARIOUS SITUATIONS. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE CONTEXT OF THE TREE PLANTING, SELECT THE APPROPRIATE TREE OPTION, AND OMIT ANY ERRONEOUS INFORMATION ON THE FINAL LEGEND. 7. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL REFLECT A LINE ITEM WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LEGEND TO STATE: STREET TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE NOTES AND LEGEND ON SHEET ? (TYPICALLY SHEET 1) 'STREE7;~IV;AM;E~,`' j~,°„t i 3'C'^~ 4c ca-v-~y, ~~ d~'~,~~~~°~``~ >',.~ ~-..~~~:.__.. ~BO1TANgICy~ALtNAME;; r~.M1U.~d+~'kb`i S ~ x.e k~'} a ~ fr~:~=~r~t~ ., tikz, ~°~ rx. :!~~, .+hxF*t u.r~ YCO.MMON ~;5~,§~F ~ r M.~ IfiNi4ME x ~ ~i E;,..,.r..N.~~: ~~.~".~.>~.3'.e.a ~MIN~GRO,W~S :rz zr +~:. n~ ,.SP'A,~CEs,"~; ?.u3r~e3.,;.'.'.b~'::..~ ~SEACING~` ,~'';-.f*+]~.~2~~. tee ~€~ f~- , ~ti,~"-,^3~..~~,. . ti, =`SIZE:">~~;r tl. ~w$„~"C,~ ~ ~ = s .,~~ `~ G,.i.~.~ „~.HI~'k ~QTY~ti 4 r. e cfi~~."S ~~'~' '~9a: .~ 1r'~Fi?T.=„~',^s~.~•o VINEYARD RHUS LANCER AFRICAN SUMAC 5' 20'0 C. 15 GAL. FILL (LOCAL ST) IN CALLE DEL PRADO PYRUS CALLERYANA NCN 3' 20' QC. 15 GAL FILL 'ARISTOCRAT IN *TREES SHALL BE 15 GALLON SIZE UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED. CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR STREET TREES: 1. ALL STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARD PLANS. 2. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY PLANTING, AN AGRONOMIC SOILS REPORT SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE CITY INSPECTOR. ANY UNUSUAL TOXICITIES OR NUTRIENT DEFICIENCIES MAY REQUIRE BACKFILL SOIL AMENDMENTS, AS DETERMINED BYTHE CITY INSPECTOR. •. ALL STREET TREES ARE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE BYTHE ENGINEERING DIVISION. 4. STREET TREES ARE TO BE PLANTED PER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS ONLY. I ~57 ~~~`-,~. FIF,L PROTECTION LoSTRICT h I it ~ ~~~~ ~ FIRE SAFETY DIVISION STANDARD CONDITIONS FD PLAN REVIEW#: FD-01-0563-A PROJECT#: DRC2001-00439 PROJECT NAME: Lifeway Church DATE: January 12, 2002 PLAN TYPE: Conditional Use Permit APPLICANT NAME: WLC Architects OCCUPANCY TYPE: Group A. Division 2 and Group B FLOOR AREA (S): 14,304 s.f and 4,648 s.f. rYPe coNSrRUCnoN: _Type V-1 hr and Type V NR LOCATION: SEC Vineyard and Calle de Prado • FD REVIEW BY: Steve Locati, Fire Protection Planning Specialist PLANNER: Kirt Courv ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2770, EXT. 3009, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The following comments and conditions represent the minimum standard for Fire District approval of the project as submitted. These conditions are based upon review of the plans as submitted. Although we have tried, not all Fire District requirements for the proposed project may be included. Additions to or changes in the project may result in additional or changed Fire District requirements. Please make the necessary changes or corrections prior to resubmitting for review. "Bold" items identified below, as a "Required Note" shall be included as notes on plans resubmitted to the Planning Division to obtain Fire District approval. If your project is approved by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, all other Fire District conditions and comments must be addressed before construction permits can be issued. Contact the Fire Safety Division to schedule an appointment to verify compliance A. Water Plans for Fire Protection 1. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and the Water District. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District standards. Contac the Fire Safety Division for • a copy of "Fire District Notes for Underground and Water Plans." 3. Required Note: When any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a fire hydrant located on a public street, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. The distance is measured as vehicular path of travel on adjacent access roadways, not line of sight. I -58 4. Required Note: Tt equired fire flow for this project shall bE 00 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as amended. For site planning purposes one fire hydrant is required per 1000 gallons of required fire flow. 5. Required Note: The required fire flow shall be delivered by fire hydrants located in accordance with Fir Code Appendix III-B, as amended. 6. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 7. Required Note: All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Water District personnel shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit test report to the Fire Safety Division. 8. Required Note: All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivering any combustible building materials on-site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Fire Construction Services representative shall inspect the installation and witness hydrant flushing. The builder/developer shall submit final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 9. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional test of the on-site fire hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer in the presence of the Water District or Fire Construction Services, as appropriate. The builder/developer shall submit the final test report to the Fire Safety Division. 10. Existing fire hydrants and mains within 600-feet of the project shall be shown on the water plan submitted for review and approval. Include main size. 9. Prior to the issuance of a fire sprinkler system permit, the applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, and calculations for the tire sprinkler system underground to the Fire Safety Division for approval. 10. If the system is private the applicant shall do the following prior to the issuance of the building permit: ' a. Submit proof that provisions have been made for the annual testing, repair, and maintenance of the system. A copy of the maintenance agreement shall be submitted to the District. b. For developments with multiple owners, they shall establish a reciprocal maintenance agreement, that shall be submitted to the Fire District for acceptance. 11. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property these markers are to be maintained in good condition by the property owner. B. Water Availability Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide evidence of adequate fire flow. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Water Availability for Fire Protection Form shall be completed by the Water District and submitted for approval by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. If sufficient water to meet fire flow requirements is not available, an automatic fire extinguishing system may be required in each structure affected by the insufficient flow. C. Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Required Note: RCFPD Ordinance 15 or other adopted code or standard requires an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed throughout the building(s). 2. Required Note: All commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet, all Group A or E Occupancies with an occupant load of 50 or more persons, multi-family residential structures, and all structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (See Fire Access below), shall be protected by an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. I ~59 3. Plans for the require utomatic fire sprinkler system shall be su ,tted to Fire Construction Services for review and approval. No work is allowed without a permit issued by .=ire Construction Services. 4. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and • accepted by Fire Construction Services. 5. The fire sprinkler system monitoring system shall be installed, tested, and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system. Monitoring is required with 20 sprinklers in Group I Occupancies, or 100 or more sprinklers in all other Occupancies. . D. Fire Access 1. Required Note: Fire District access roadways shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building constructed when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located more than 150-feet from Fire District approved vehicle access. The distance is measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building. 2. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, highways, as well as private roads, streets and designated fire lanes. 3. CommerciaVlndustrial and Multi-family Residential-Required Note: Prior to recordation of a subdivision/tract/parcel map or the issuance of any grading permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit plans and specification for the approval of the Fire District for all Fire District access roadways to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior of every structure on-site. 4. Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note: Prior to issuance of any grading permits, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of plans for all public and/or roads, streets, courts and cul-de-sacs from the Fire District in consultation with the Grading Committee. The plans shall include the plan view, sectional view, and indicate the width of the street or court measured flow line to flow line. All proposed fire apparatus turnarounds shall be clearly marked when adead-end street exceeds 150-feet or when otherwise required. Applicable CC&R's, or other approved documents, shall contain provisions that prohibit obstructions such as traffic calming devices (speed bumps, humps, etc.), control gates, bollards, or other modifications in fire lanes or • access roadways without prior written approval of the Fire District, Fire Safety Division. 5. Private Roadways and Fire Lanes-Required Note: The inside turn radius shall be 20-feet. The outside tum radius shall be not less than 50-feet. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. The minimum unobstructed width for a Fire District access roadway or fire lane is 26-feet. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. At any entry median the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet. 6. Dead-end Fire District Access Roadways-Required Note: Dead-end Fire District access roadways in excess of 150-feet shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. This may include a cul-de-sac, "hammerhead," or other means approved by the Fire District. 7. Required Note: All portions of the facility or any portion of the exterior wall of the first story shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured by an unobstructed approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates, and fences are an obstruction. 8. Approved access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to exterior building openings. 9. Required Note: All buildings that have three or more stories, or are 30-feet in height shall be provided with fire apparatus access on at least two sides. Access to exterior walls shall extend from 5 to 50-feet horizontally, with no vertical obstructions. 10. Knox Rapid Entry System: A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 11. Required Note: Trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6- • inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire vehicles. 12. Required Note: Emergency access, a minimum 26-feet in width and 14-feet, 6-inches in height shall be provided and maintained free and clear of any obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District Standards. I -60 13. Prior to the issuance a building permit, the applicant shall subn ans and obtain approval from the Fire District for required Fire District access roadways less than 40-feet in width. When fire lanes are required the plans shall indicate the locations of red curbing and signage. A drawing of the proposed signage that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be submitted to and approved. Contact the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at (909) 477-2770 for a copy of the "FD Access -Fire Lanes" standard. ' 14. Fire Lanes: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire lanes shall be installed in accordance with the approved fire lane plan. The CC&R's or other approved documents shall contain a fire lane map and provisions that prohibit parking in the fire lanes. The method of enforcement shall be documented. The CC&R's shall also identify who is responsible for not less than annual inspection and maintenance of all required fire lanes. 15. New buildings other than single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. 27. In multi-unit complexes approved address numbers, and/or building identification letters shall be provided on the front and back of all units, suites, or buildings. The Fire District shall review and approve the numbering plan in coordination with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. E. Traffic Signal Preemption Devices 1. Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, the Fire District in consultation with the City Engineer shall approve the locations of Traffic Signal Preemption Devices. F. Combustible Construction Letter 1. Required Note: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for combustible construction, the builder shall submit a letter to the Fire District on company letterhead stating that the minimum water supply for fire fighting purposes and the all-weather fire protection access roadway that meets Fire District Standards shall be in place and operational before any combustible material is placed on-site. Th' roadway shall be maintained at all times. G. Architectural Building Plans 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit plans for the review and approval of the Fire District. Call the Fire Construction Services Unit at (909) 477-2713 for any required notes to be placed on the plans prior to submittal. H. Fire District Service Fees' 1. The following fees may be applicable to this project and are being identified at this time to assist the ,applicant in planning for future costs. Other comments in this letter identify fire protection features or other required installations subject to approval by the Fire District. The fees for these additional plan reviews are to be paid at the time plans submitted. When the required plans are submitted the following fees will be assessed by the Fire Safety Division: " $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial ormulti-family dwelling projects (Paid prior to TRC) $66 Fire District Access Review (Includes Fire Lane Plans) $132 Conditional Use Permit Review Fee (CUP) $132 for Private Fire Mains or Fire Sprinkler Underground Water Supply $677 (per new building) for New Commercial and Industrial Development " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1.00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division. ' Note: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans. I -61 2. The following servic :es are due to the Fire District and payal 3t this time: $82 Start-up fee for commercial, industrial ormulti-family dwelling projects (Paid prior to TRC) $132 Conditional Use Permit Review Fee (CUP) • $214 -Total due at this time. Remit payment by check made payable to the "Rancho Cucamonaa Fire District." , " Plus amicrofiche/laser-fiche fee of $1.00 per plan sheet for all final plans approved by the Fire Safety Division. `Nate: Separate plan check fees will be assessed by the Fire Construction Services unit for review of tenant improvement work, fire protection systems (fire sprinklers, alarm systems, fire extinguishing systems, etc.), and/or any consultant reviews upon submittal of plans. I. Hazard Control Permits 1. As noted below Special Permits may be required, dependent upon approved use(s): a. Operate a place of public assembly. b. To install any access control device, system, or any material under, upon or within the required fire district access roadway. This includes any gate, barrier, traffic-calming device, speed bump, speed hump or any device that delays or slows Fire District response. c. Candles and open flame in public assembly. J. Hazardous Materials -Compliance with Disclosure and Reporting Regulations The below listed businesses, operations, uses or conditions require that the San Bernardino County Fire Department review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 for forms and • assistance. They are the CUPA for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Any business that uses, generates, processes, produces, treats, stores, emits, or discharges a hazardous material in quantities at or exceeding 55 gallons, 500 pounds, or 200 cubic feet (compressed gas) at any one time in the course of a year. 2. All hazardous waste generators, regardless of quantity generated. 3. Any business that handles, stores, or uses Category (I) or (II) pesticides, as defined by FIFRA, regardless of amount. 4. Any business that handles DOT Hazard Class 1 (explosives, found in 49 CFR) regardless of amount. 5. Any business that handles extremely hazardous substances (EHS's) in quantities exceeding the threshold planning quantity (T.P.O.). Extremely Hazardous Substances are designated pursuant to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act Section 302, and are listed in 40 CFR Part 355. 6. Any business subject to the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA), also known as SARA Title III. Generally, EPCRA includes facilities that handle hazardous substances above 10,000 pounds,.or extremely hazardous substances above threshold planning quantities. There are some exceptions, including retail gas stations with up to 75,000 gallons of gasoline or 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel in Underground Storage Tanks (UST's) that meet the 1996 upgrade requirements. To get more information on EPCRA requirements call 1-800-535-0202. Due to State disclosure consolidation laws, Tier II forms need not be submitted to the various State and Federal agencies. Submission of your Business Emergency/ Contingency Plan will meet this requirement; however, EPCRA does require full annual inventory submission rather than a certification statement each March 1. Also, EPCRA facilities are bound by the trade secret limitations of EPCRA, and must sign every page of inventory, • 7. Any business that handles radioactive material that is listed in Appendix B of Chapter 1, of 10 CFR. I-62 8. If the facility is a N, business, a Certificate of Occupancy i~ d by Building and Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting specific hazardous _ material disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required it regulated substances are to b used or stored at the new facility. Contact County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-3041 f~ forms and assistahce. 9. Any business that operates on rented or leased property, and is required to submit a Plan, is required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates, and has complied with the provision, and must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within 5 working days after receiving a request from the owner. 10. The Fire Code adopted by the Fire District has a provision requiring collection of information regarding hazardous materials at facilities for purposes of Fire Code implementation and emergency response. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy a copy of the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan -New Business (Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory) shall be submitted to the Fire District after it is approved by the San Bernardino County Fire Department. In some cases additional information that is not in the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan may be required in order to support local fire prevention and emergency response programs. K. Plan Submittal Required Notice Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1997/98 Building, Fire, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes; 1999 Electrical and RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD32, Guidelines and Standards. L. Other Fire District Requirements or Comments 1. NOTE: The Fire Safety Division has previously met with representative of WLC regarding fire district access. The results of that meeting are not reflected in the current resubmittal. Fire District Conditions of Approval- Template SL 11/20/01 Revision I -63 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 TO COMPLETE THE LIFEWAY CHURCH FACILITY BY ADDING A NEW CLASSROOM WING AND MULTI- PURPOSEHALL INTHE LOW DENSITY (2 TO 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7477 VINEYARD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF=APN: 0208- 921-36. A. Recitals. 1. WLC Architects on behalf of Lifeway Church, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of October 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 22, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 297 feet and lot depth of approximately 720 feet, and is presently improved with the Phase 1 sanctuary and office building of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439; and b. The property to the north of the subject site issingle-family residential; the property to the south consists ofsingle-family residential; the property to the east is single-family residential; and the property to the west is a public park; and c. The site has sufficient parking for the proposed uses at 230 spaces; and d. The substantial site improvements, landscaping, lighting, and circulation are in • place; and e. The portable classroom units are only temporary and will be removed as part of the completion of this project. I -64 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-62 DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specifc fndings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby fnds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 24, 2002, in connection with the City's approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 forthe approval of the initial project. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent or discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce • impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 and concludes that substantial changes to the project orthe circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In that the applicant is currently proposing a less intense project by consolidating the initial Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall buildings into a smaller single structure that reduces the building height, square footage, and building mass by eliminating approximately 1,900 square feet. In the initial proposal these two functions (i.e., the Gymnasium and Fellowship Hall) were provided in separate buildings on two levels. In the revised proposal the buildings are combined into a single Multi-Purpose Hall that would be located on a lower mid plaza level. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, the Planning Department has determined that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination that no additional environmental review is required, and based on its own independentjudgment, concurs in the staffs determination. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All conditions (including Standard Conditions) set for Conditional Use • Permit DRC2001-00439 (Planning Commission Resolution 02-43) shall pertain to this project. I -65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-62 DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 • Page 3 2) The full five years permitted in Section 17.02.100 (Lapse ofApproval and Extensions) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall apply to this approval including the other requirements and limitations of that section, except that the temporary classroom units shall be removed from the site no later than the end of the five-year period regardless of the status of the progress of the proposed development or any extension that may be provided for this expansion. 3) In addition to the statement of absolute approval lapse for the temporary portable classroom units in Condition 2 above, the following condition shall operate as to the duration of these units on the site: The eventual location for the meeting rooms that currently house the religious educational programs by use of the temporary portable classroom units is the new Classroom Wing. Therefore, the temporary portable classroom units shall be vacated upon the approved occupancy of the new Classroom Wing or the end of the five-year approval period of this Conditional Use Permit, whichever is first. The units must not remain on the site mare than 90 days after this date. 4) The temporary classroom units shall be maintained in good condition at all times including, but not limited to, paint. No signs and/or banners shall be installed and/or affixed to the temporary classroom units. • 5) That at least 50% or more of the new trees to be planted, as shown on the submitted Planting Plan, shall be a minimum size of 36 inch box to further buffer the proposed development from the neighboring residential properties. 6) That all existing and proposed fencing, retaining walls, and garden walls shall be maintained and repaired to fuhction as so designed. 7) The installation of the proposed landscaping and stucco finish for the southerly wall as well as the wrought iron fencing shown on the Site Plan shall be completed in accordance with the approved plans and is subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any occupancy permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • I ~66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-62 DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS October 22, 2008 Page 4 • BY. Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of October, 2008, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • I -67 :: _q COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 SUBJECT: LIFEWAY CHURCH APPLICANT: WLC ARCHITECTS LOCATION: YARD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements com~~etion Dale 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its _/_/_ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, offcers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval 02-43 and 08-62, Standard _/_/_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. • SC-1-OS 1 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res & Stf rep\DRC2006-00926StdCond 10-22.doc I -68 Project No DRC2006-00926 Completion Date 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be =/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. .All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing forcommunity concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. C. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. _/_/_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION • PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2008 Res 8 Sif rep\DRC2006-00926StdCond 10-22.doc I ~69 April 26, 2007 Lifeway Church Modular Classrooms 7477 Vineyard DRC2006-00926 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire.Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS Fellowship Hall. Gymnasium & Educational Building THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT This site is required to be annexed into the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Community facility District 85-1. The process must be completed before issuance of the Building permits; allow 6 months for the completion the process; apply now. The modular classroom buildings will also be required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and/or a fire alarm system The FiCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonpa.ca.us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section. Search by article; the preceding number of the standard refers to the icle. Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the rrespondrng standard. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between sire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: i. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. ii. At intersections. iii. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. iv. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. v. A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building. I ~70 .. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. ~. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. • FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide .he required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 2. Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site 3. The on all site plans submitted for review must show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. lpproval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems • Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in: 1. Assembly &Educational Occupancy Buildings 2. Commercial buildings greater than 7,499 square feet or larger. 3. "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access). 4. When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7. 5. When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system. Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code. 2 I -71 2. Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained. Plans and specrfications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6. •3. Based on the number of sprinkler heads; the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation,. gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet. c. The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet. tl. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. • e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any prvate entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. Support a minimum load of 70;000 Dounds gross vehicle weight IGVW). Trees and shrubs planted adiacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in buildings in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard ~9-2. The following design requirements apply: LJ 3 I-72 a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Ccrstruction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. r. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. • .. Gates may be motorized or manual. f. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. ~. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20.00. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fait-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h, Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 6. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan • illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FGC-? 0 nccu~pancy and Hazard Contre! Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be regwred for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or X88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or budding permits. 4 I -73 Chronofogicai Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions ~RIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers." On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence'of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subiect to the release of power). • Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 5 I -74 5. Access Centro) Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. 7. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access • roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire ' Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 8. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness. When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance. Larger address numbers will be required on bwldings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings. The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites. 9. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 10. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch • or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site'in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. • 6 I ~75 ~i~'G.,2v Gni°~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October I8, 2008 Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97 729 OCT 2 02008 RECEIVED -PLANNING Dear Planning Commission Members: I am writing to you at this time regarding the hearing on the Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 - WLC Architects - A review of the Master Phasing Plan for remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development that is scheduled for 10/22/08. It is unfortunate that after all these years of dealing with this project and all the concerns we have, that we are unable to attend the hearing on 10/22 due to a prior commitment that cannot be changed. When the initial project was presented, we weren't ecstatic about it but not opposed to it as it was explained to us. Unfortunately, it was not built according to what was explained to us at the meetings that the church set up, particularly the area next to the north side of our property (8930 Balsa St.) where they explained that the street being built would be about the height of our block wall at the east end of our property. When the building began and the contractors started moving a lot of dirt around, we became very concerned and contacted the city about the project and how high the road was built up from the original topography of the land. The road is currently about 10 feet above our block wall at the end of our property as opposed to what we were led to believe. A huge concern we have is that there seems to be a lack of records on the part of the city to verify whether indeed the project was built according to what was planned. I don't believe any redlined (if that is the appropriate term) records were ever found for verification and what was found and presented to us was only after many months and us ending up setting up a meeting with the Deputy City Manager, Mahdi Aluzri and two council members, among others. We still have no confidence that this was built according to the plans, particularly regarding the raising up of the ground Level of the property prior to the buildings being erected. If the city code says that the building height is 30 feet above "adjacent property," it just seems wrong to allow someone to build up the property 10-19 feet before they start the 30 foot building, making it 40-49 feet above the original Sand. The property before the church began the building project actually sloped down as it went to the north from our property, and now we are faced with a solid wall ofwalls and buildings up to 40-50 feet above our property, right next to us so that we aze totally blocked from any view at all except for any sky we might venture to see directly above us! (Please don't get distracted about the walls being built because that is not the issue and we insisted on the wall by the side of the road so we would have a little privacy. We can deal with that. 1t is the height of the buildings that we are having problems with, after the ground level was built up so much!). Those planning commission members who came to see the view from our back yard after the story poles were erected (another long story in how the city and church couldn't seem to get the process right without complaints and intervention from the neighbors being impacted) can testify to the height of the proposed buildings and the impact on our property All along we have tried to get the city to take some ownership of the project and assign one person in the city for us to deal with but that never happened and we have had nothing but the "run around" when it came to concerns. The problems have been from the dust created and flooding of neighbor's property, to the inattention to the landscaping, leading to dead trees (one not being taken care of even a year later), the lights erected and the lack of blocking so they don't shine directly into our homes, the placing of portables, etc. The church has also been very unresponsive as well, including up to the detail of our neighbors to the east of us complaining about the retaining wall that was erected and the lousy job that was done, having no regard for how [he wall would look on the neighbors' side of the ~~~ ~ property, and the wall still "leaking" and having algae buildup. Nothing has ever been accomplished or rectified by the city or the church until the neighbors have raised concerns many times. At a DRC meeting almost a year ago, the church was instructed to work out a positive solution with the neighbors. The pastor approached me, sometime later as he drove over to my house on New Year's Day, with no notice, to explain what he wanted to do and to set up a meeting for the neighbors. I explained that all the neighbors should be included and had to insist that all be notified. When we went to the meeting, which no city staff attended, the church presented what they wanted to do to change things and considered no feedback whatsoever from the neighbors. At the next DRC meeting, the church was praised for changing things, in spite of the fact that they did not "work with the neighbors" as had been instructed. The DRC has continued to praise them for this in spite of a total lack of working with the neighbors. The person in charge of the last DRC meeting again praised the church for being "more than willing to look into and correct" things that needed to be changed, in spite of the fact that the church has been unwilling to look at moving the location of the proposed gymnasium to the back of the property, where it would be actually lower than the original hill as opposed to being so much higher than the original The DRC actually asked the church to look into this then praised them when they didn't. At the back of the property, the building would also spread the impact of the project on the surrounding neighbors instead of putting the entire negative impact of the project on the heads of 3-4 neighbors! This is what we would suggest happen, that the building of the gymnasium be on the back of the property. We still don't understand why this shouldn't be the case. The DRC also seemed to be praising the church for lowering the height of the building to 30 feet instead of 38 feet (which was against code an}~,vay!). It seems that everyone in the city agrees that this project should not have been approved as it was and as it has been built and the people who approved it are no longer around. But the feeling is that we have to live with it anyway and continue to approve something that has such a huge impact on some of the neighbors; that the placement of the gymnasium still has to be where it is proposed because that is where the conceptual footprint was located on the first approvals. Now that we know more and see how the project was built, we should be smart enough to see that the building should not be placed there but on the back of the property instead, where it will have the least negative impact. That is what we would request. The other huge concern that many neighbors have is the building of the classroom building. Not that it is a problem as a building, but that the church clearly plans on having a school and day care in that building. They have expressed this on a number of occasions, including at the neighbor meeting (that was very umreighborly) that was held at the church. If we had not complained and raised the issues at the planning commission meeting where this was originally presented, we have no doubt that it would have been approved, even without a traffic impact study, as the city staff were set to recommend approval! The issue is that the church is no longer applying for a school at this time, but the building has not been changed one bit from the original proposal and includes 1 l large and some very large (57' x 23' and 45' 47') classrooms which seem much more than sufficient for Sunday School classes. Our concern is that the city will follow the same process it has been following with the current application and say that since "the building was approved to be built, we have no choice but to allow them to open a school" 1n the Notice of Public Hearing that was sent out, it states that if we want to appeal the decision of the planning commission, we have to do it within 10 days. Since we can't be at the meeting, please have someone call us at (909) 980-5923 the following day (10/23) and notify us of the decision of the planning commission. The letter states that an appeal has to be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee, but it is our understanding that there is another way to appeal it through the city council and we would like to know the details ofall ways this could be appealed and what the process would be. We would like this information as soon as possible, even before the meeting if possible, but the following day at the latest, since this is information that I would think should have been sent in the notice that went out. We appreciate your time and hope you will give thoughtful consideration to our concerns regarding the approval of the "remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development" and look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, ~.cnc~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~i~,~~ ,~ ,fin Cf i~~/~. (~~ Z, arles & Barbara Rich 8930 Balsa St. Rancho Cucamo nga, CA 9] 730 P.S. I apologize for the P.S. but want to make sure I include ever}rthing that might be raised in an appeal. When the DRC directed the church to work with the neighbors regarding the building, we also took it to mean that they should work with the neighbors regarding what to do to take care of the fact that they built the wall the way they did, with the poor side facing the neighbors. Again, true to form the church made their proposition without the neighbors involvement and the DRC accepted it, knowing they did not work with the neighbors on this issue. I understand that ai this time that the church and the city have indicated that the church is planning on stuccoing the wall and planting large trees. We have concerns about the stucco due to the fact that they have not taken care of our side of the wall, which indicates they likely won't take care ofany issue that arises with the stucco as well as all the landscaping. We don't really know what is meant by the large trees or how many because it was not explained at the DRC meeting. I don't know what the answer is on this because I don't know how the other neighbors fee] about the stucco and the large trees but we feel the neighbors should be involved in the decision to fix it since we are the ones that were wronged by how the church built the wall. ~c~~ ~~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-01 DRC2008-00591 October 22, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed alteration is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Beve4epraeat-Cede Historic Preservation Ordinance, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. The action proposed ~ ^,1^^°I~°•~•~!~ Iti°' ^^~'^,^r~ ^"°r^! ^^ o°•^,'1 will not be detrimental to t''° tir^ !,°~Ilti ^c,,.., ,.,la^r„ ,vi.~1°. ^u., Ir. °rv ° ;;;,pry ,°.„°^,~ ^ .~° „~^ ^ 1„ a structure or feature of significant aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historic nature. sed~,e-s#a^ges-arm-a,~,o ;s~v,,,s,-~.e-be°~r~ra~ed~.,~ 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set fort in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves Landmark Alteration Permit DRC2008-00591, subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshall's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 2) The project must be completed as per Site Plan "D5 Historic Artifacts Site Layout." 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2008. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Richard B. Fletcher, Chairman James R. Troyer, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, ~ ~ B, ~ G -- 'f~ i~~ ~o.~-~ ~,o~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-57 DRC2007-00542 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 22, 2008 Page 6 5) Overhead utilities on the north side of 6th Street east of Haven Avenue were previously placed underground by the developer of Design Review 86-07. The current owner of the property at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of utility undergrounding from adjacent properties as outlined in Utility Reimbursement Agreement URA-02. Developer of APN: 0210-081-13 shall fulfill its obligation for fair share payment as outlined in said agreement, prior to building permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: ~e~~a~o~ ~ ~~~ 1= `~ PPS 2t~Z-1.~ l~ CS~~ S l~~zxt.-S ~1,~4v lt~l~ ~=-ptL ~Z pC~~7dC~Z ZZav~ p (,1-~N lN~ ~ P~'t ~L~~~- ~ `~-(~~iN~ ~2~-kt-Nlc~l'~ CIYY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ocr 2 o Zoos RECEIVED - PLANNING Zfe~~ T CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on October 22, 2008, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on November 12, 2008. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2008-00593 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to modify the definition of landscaping under Section 17.02.140 of the Development Code to allow for synthetic turf. Staff has prepared a negative declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This item will be forwarded to City Council for further action. The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote Ayes: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY Noes: NONE Absent: HOWDYSHELL Abstain: NONE Date: October 23, 2008 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J. Schrader, declare as follows I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on October 22, 2008, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above; and that on October 23, 2008, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on October 23, 2008, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. / //dL=~' his Planning Commission Secretary