Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010/06/02 - Agenda Packet
10500 Civic Center Drive 4 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARDS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1St and 3'~ Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M. JUNE 2, 2010 MEMBERS MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS Donald J. Kurth, M.D. L. Dennis Michael Rex Gutierrez Sam Spagnolo Diane Williams CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK Jack Lam, AICP James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room ............. 5:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETING Council Chambers ...........................7:00 P.M. ~, INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC ' RANCHO IuIJCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display auaro or v~suar marer~ar. grease see me c:rty c:rerrc perore the meerrnp commences. it you are present to speaK on an "Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers. The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho- cucamonga.ca.us/whatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:llwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Not cation of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 1 ~ ~ ~. JUNE 2, 2010 cUiCAMONGA -- A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM A1. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -RDA, F/RE & CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING PENDING LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) - CAMPBELL V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CASE NO. CIVRS905562 -City D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS THE ETIWANDA DEPOT); LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, AND SANBAG REPRESENTATIVE, NEGOTIATING PARTIES -City D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND EAST AVE., LINDA D. DANIELS, RDA DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTY -RDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 2, 2010 E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 2, 2010 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Kurth Mayor Pro Tem Michael Councilmembers Gutierrez, Spagnolo and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Presentation of Certificate for Crossing Guard of the Year 2010. H2. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to TOUCH Ministries, a partner at the RC Family Resource Center, as a recipient of the 2010 Laymen Award for District 11 of the California Parks and Recreation Society. H3. Presentation of Certificates to donors and sponsors of the "Ron Ives Bicycle Safety Rodeo." I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. E MENT A E R EDEV LOP NCY, G FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 4 JUNE 2, 2010 ~~ ,,~~.. ~ CU CAMONGA .T. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: May 19, 2010 (Regular Meeting) 1 J2. Approval of Check Register dated May 12 through May 25, 2010, for the total amount of $1,771,402.62. J3. Approval to proceed with the biennial review of the Conflict of Interest Code for the 3 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council. J4. Approval to accept the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' 4 east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023 as complete, approve the final contract amount of $98,495.66, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, and approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. 7 RESOLUTION NO. RA 10-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-023 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J5. Approval to release of Faithful Performance Bond No. 728181 P, retained in lieu of $ Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $993,284.00, for the Pack Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093. J6. Release of Faithful Performance Bond No. SU5025070, retained in lieu of Maintenance 10 Guarantee Bond in the amount of $702,684.10, for the Epicenter Stadium Seat Replacement Project, Contract No. RA08-018. J7. Approval for award and authorize the increase to Contract No. RA09-017 in the amount of 12 $409,237.00 to Jacobs Engineering, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $40,923.70 for Construction Support Services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue, to be funded from 2004 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 2660801-5650/1189660-0. J8. Approval for award and authorize the increase to Contract No. RA07-113 in the amount of 14 $465,000.00 to Dan Guerra and Associates, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $46,500.00 for Construction Survey Services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue, to be funded from 2004 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 2660801-5650/1189660-0. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND - CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 5 _ JUNE 2, 2010 J9. Approval for award of a contract in the amount of $556,800.00 to AUFBAU Corporation (RA 10-009), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of 16 $55,680.00 for Construction and Inspection Support Services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project from San Bernardino Road to Vineyard Avenue, to be funded from 2004 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 2660801-5650/1189660-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: May 19, 2010 (Regular Meeting) 1C2. Approval of Check Register dated May 12 through May 25, 2010, for the total amount of 18 $109,023.58. K3. Approval to proceed with the biennial review of the Conflict of Interest Code for the 22 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council. L. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. L1. Approval of Minutes: May 19, 2010 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated May 12 through May 25; 2010, and payroll ending May 2$ 25, 2010, for the total amount of $3,176,661.71. L3. Approval and appropriation of funds received from the County of San Bernardino, 56 Department of Aging and Adult Services, for a Senior Supportive Services -Older Americans Act Title III B Grant in the amount of $7,500 (Revenue Fund Account: 1258000- 4740 Expenditure Fund Account: 1258401-5300). 57 L4. Approval to proceed with the biennial review of the Conflict of Interest Code for the Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council. L5. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission to approve a light variance requested for Minors, Majors, Juniors and Senior Divisions All-Star 5$ Tournament hosted by District 71 Little League during June 26 -July 22, 2010, at Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks. L6. Approval of Amendment to the Corridor Design Authority (210 Foothill Freeway) Joint 63 Powers Agreement (CO 94-009). REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ .TUNE 2, 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 10-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY (210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, TO CHANGE THE VOTING MEMBERSHIP OF THE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS L7. Approval to award the purchase of Microsoft software, including SQL server, Windows server, and Windows server client access licenses in the amount of $93,875 to Dell, utilizing Western States Contract Alliance (WSCA) Contract Number 627160, for FY 2009/10 as follows: $34,731 from Account No. 1001209-5152 (computer software) and $59,144 from Account No. 1 71 4001-51 52 (Computer EquipmentlTechnical Replacement Fund-Computer Software). L8. Approval to award the purchase of network equipment and software in the amount of $180,307 to Nexus IS, utilizing the County of Riverside's competitively bid contract number RIVCO-02420-002-5/13 for FY 2009/10 to be funded from the Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement fund as follows: $81,130 from Account No. 1714001- 5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment), $98,521 from Account No. 1714001-5215 (08~M/Computer Equipment), and $656 from Account No. 1714001-5152 (Computer Software); also approve the transfer of $61,400 from Account No. 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment) to 1714001-5215 (O&M/Computer Equipment). L9. Approval of a resolution ordering the annexation of certain property into Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Light Maintenance District No. 8, located on East Avenue and southeast of Fisher Drive, submitted by Bishop Protestant Episcopal Church. RESOLUTION NO. 10-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHT DISTRICT NO. 8 LOCATED ON EAST AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST OF FISHER DRIVE (APN 0227-071-17) L10. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract in the amount of $598,170, to the apparent low bidder, O'Donnell Construction, Inc. (CO 10-059) of San Dimas, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 15% contingency in the amount of $89,726, for "Citywide Bridge Deck Maintenance, Phase 2 of 3" base bid plus additive bids 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 per the attached bid summary to be funded from Account 1 1 1 2303-5650/1 5421 1 2-0 ($477,326 contract amount plus contingency of $89,726) and 1 1 1 6303-5650/1 5421 1 6-0 ($120,844 contract amount). L11. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Margarita Ortega-Paulli (CO 10-060) for a single family residence, located on the north side of Nineteenth Street, East of Beryl Street. 6 69 71 72 74 75 83 85 REDEVELOPMENT AGENC Y FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND ~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 2, 2010 ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 10-076 gs A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MARGARITA ORTEGA- PAULLI AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 88 L12. Approval to accept the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023 as complete, approve the final contract amount of $98,495.66, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a claim for the reimbursement of approved SANBAG funding from the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3, 20% Transit Access Funds, and approve a resolution to order the annexation of the territory to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. 91 RESOLUTION NO. 10-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA 09-023 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 92 RESOLUTION NO. 10-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A CLAIM FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF APPROVED SANBAG FUNDING FROM TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ARTICLE 3, 20% TRANSIT ACCESS FUNDS FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE 93 RESOLUTION NO. 10-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, TO THE WORK PROGRAM WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 2, 2010 8 L13. Approval of a resolution denying an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to revoke 97 Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00283R for Loco Cantina 8 Grill, and approval of a resolution denying an appeal of a Planning Commission decision to revoke Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R for Loco Cantina 8 Grill. 99 RESOLUTION NO. 10-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00283R EL LOCO CANTINA 8~ GRILL, AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT WITHIN THE MASI PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-011-38 RESOLUTION NO. 10-081 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2007-00284R FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE MASI PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-011-38 L14. Release of Faithful Performance Bond No. 728181 P, retained in lieu of Maintenance 109 Guarantee Bond in the amount of $993,284.00, for the Pack Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093. L15. Release of Faithful Performance Bond No. 786029P, retained in lieu of Maintenance 111 Guarantee Bond in the amount of $239,980.00, for the Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations project, Contract No. 08-052. L16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 16311, located on the 113 southeast corner of Hellman and Sixth Street submitted by Crestwood Corporation. M. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 2, 2010 9 M1. CONSIDERATION OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE 115 - DRC2010-00261 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, aFederally-required document for the receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which provides an overview of the laws, regulations, or other obstacles that may affect accessibility to housing. 117 RESOLUTION NO. 10-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE DRC2010-00261, A FEDERALLY-REQUIRED DOCUMENT FOR THE RECEIPT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS, WHICH PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAWS, REGULATIONS, OR OTHER OBSTACLES THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESSIBILITY TO HOUSING; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF N. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. N1. ETIWANDA DEPOT NATIONAL REGISTER DESIGNATION 206 N2. INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOLICITATION AND AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO 210 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. ORDINANCE NO. 831 (first reading) 211 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOLICITATION, AND AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO GUCAMONGA MUNICPAL CODE N3. APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION 223 COMMISSION OUTLINING THE DESIGN PURPOSES. GOALS AND PARAMETERS FOR THE FUTURE VETERANS/ARMED FORCES REFLECTION AREA AT CENTRAL PARK. O. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. 01. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION 228 COMMISSION. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _ JUNE 2, 2010 10 02. CONSIDERATION OF CI TY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION RE GARDING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS. 03. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) 04. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) P. IDENTIFICAT ION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING ADJOURNMENT 229 I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 27, 2010, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. May 19, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Fire District and Redevelopment Agency held a closed session on Wednesday, May 19, 2010, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. by Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager Economic and Community Development and James Markman, City Attorney. ~~ B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) ~~ Chairman/Mayor Donald J. Kurth announced the closed session item: D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN GILLISON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS -RDA, FIRE & CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE, SOUTH OF 9T" STREET, COMMONLY KNOWN AS APN 0209-013-22, LINDA D. DANIELS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, NEGOTIATING PARTY FOR THE CITY AND MITCH ALDERMAN. NEGOTIATING PARTY FOR SANBAG -RDA 8 CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No one was present to comment on the closed session items. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION Closed session began at 5:10 p.m. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session adjourned at 6:30 p.m. with no action taken. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 1 of 16 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Agencymembers/Boardmembers/Councilmembers: Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, Sam Spagnolo, Vice Chairman/Vice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem L. Dennis Michael and Chairman/PresidenUMayor Donald J. Kurth. Also present were: James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Joe Cusimano, Police Chief; Mike Bell, Fire Chief; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; James Troyer, Planning Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; Mark Steuer, Engineering Director; Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Official; Janice Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk. H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of Outstanding Participants of the Healthy RC C.A.S.A. Healthy Cooking Program. Mayor Kurth recognized the participants of the Healthy RC C.A.S.A. Healthy Cooking program. H2. Announcement of the 2010/11 Season of performances for the Lewis Family Playhouse at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. Susan Sluka-Kelly, Community Services Supervisor, announced the 2010/11 Season of performances for the Lewis Family Playhouse. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. John Lyons congratulated graduates and cautioned them not to drink and drive. He noted that the Run for the Wall participants left today from Victoria Gardens. Mr. Lyons endorsed Mayor Kurth as a candidate for the 63rd Assembly District. 12. Lisa Thompson stated that she lived in the Terra Vista area in the boundaries of Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) 4. She referenced comments made of a coalition of residents in LMD 6, wondered what offer was given to them and requested that information on these meetings be posted on the Internet. Mrs. Thompson noted that the passage of the increased assessment in LMD 4 has not changed anything, indicating that there are still concerns with the level of maintenance in LMD 4. She noted that another Proposition 218 election could not be held for one year and asked that it be postponed. I3. Donavan Caver reported that he was a student at Chaffey College enrolled in the Automotive Collision and Repair program. As of Monday, he stated that this program has been closed. Mr. Caver indicated that he has exhausted all avenues with the College to reopen the program, noted that a petition to keep the program was submitted with over 176 signatures on it and requested assistance. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 2 of 16 14. Jordan Giali stated that he will be graduating from Ontario Christian High School and congratulated the Council on the superb City. He was looking forward to tonight's meeting. I5. John Fisher and Tim Walker spoke to the City Council regarding an automobile accident on May 14, 2010 whereby an out-of-control driver crashed his vehicle into their living room at 7716 Beryl Street. Mr. Fisher noted that this is the third time that an accident had occurred and requested that a retaining wall or other type of remedy be put in place. I6. Jim Moffatt referenced campaign literature distributed by the Don Kurth for Assembly 2010 committee. He indicated that the information regarding the banner program was not correct and requested that either the Mayor or the committee provide a retraction. 17. Ron Vanderbroeke invited the City Council and the audience to Omaha Jack's Memorial Day for the Military, to be held on May 31, 2010 from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. 18. Bill Hanlon congratulated his daughter on her recent receipt of a Master's Degree. He noted that candidates for public office are placing themselves above the law by placing political signs illegally on private property. Mr. Hanlon concurred that the Mayor did not support veterans. 19. Ed Hills representing the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) 6 Coalition indicated that they supported the recommendation contained in Item 03 (Approval to Initiate Proceedings to Establish LMD 6R). 110. Joseph Machado invited the City Council and the audience to Central Park on June 5, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. He will be biking across America and hoped to raise $500,000 for charity. Further information is available at www.bikingforamerica.com. 111. Luana Hernandes invited the City Council and the audience to the Historical Home Tour, to be held on May 23, 2010 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. J. CONSENT CALENDAR-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Agency at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agencymember for discussion. J1. Approval of Minutes: May 5, 2010 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated April 28 through May 11, 2010, for the total amount of $1,061,411.16. J3. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RTK Architects, Inc. (RA 10-008/ CO 10- 054), of Los Angeles for the creation of the Fleet Shop CNG Modifcation Design Development, Construction Documents, Construction Administration and miscellaneous services in the amount of $33,000 ($30,900 contract amount plus a contingency of $2,100), to be funded from Acct. No. 1025001-5650/1541025-0 (Capital Reserve), and $22,000 ($20,600 contract amount plus a contingency of $1,400) to be funded from Acct. No. 2650801- 5650/1541650-0 (Public Improvements - 2001 Tax Allocation Bond. J4. Approval to reject all bids received for the Hellman Avenue Master Planned Storm Drain and Street Improvements -Phase 1 from 9~" Street to San Bernardino Road, and approval of a Resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Hellman Avenue Master Planned Storm Drain and Street Improvements Phase 1 from 9~h Street to San Bernardino Road, to be funded from Redevelopment Agency Funds. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 3 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. RA 10-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 1 FROM 9T" STREET TO SAN BERNARDINO ROAD IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS J5. Approval to reject all bids received for the Removal of the Old Southern Pacific Railroad Bridge west of Baker Avenue, and approval of a resolution to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids' for the Removal of the Old Southern Pacific Railroad Bridge west of Baker Avenue, to be funded from RDA Tax Allocation Bond Funds. RESOLUTION NO. RA 10-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "REMOVAL OF THE OLD SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD BRIDGE WEST OF BAKER AVENUE" IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS J6. Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2009/10 Appropriations. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Boardmember for discussion. K1. Approval of Minutes: May 5, 2010 (Regular Meeting) K2. Approval of Check Register dated April 28 through May 11, 2010, for the total amount of $48,343.39. K3. Approval of an annexation map showing Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0201-182-36, 37 & 38, (Amin Khan, Owner), located on the east side of Winchester Ct. between Wilson Avenue and Northridge Dr, to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION N0. 88-10-1) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 K4. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 88-10-1 (APNs: 0201-182-36, 37 & 38), (Amin Khan, Owner), into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, specifying services proposed to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes proposed to be levied within the annexation territory and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 4 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88- 10-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 K5. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Fire Support Services Association for Fiscal Year 2010-11. RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-015 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 K6. Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2009/10 Appropriations. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Michael, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained within the Consent Calendar. Motion carried 5-0. ~~ L. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL ~~ The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember for discussion. L1. Approval of Minutes: May 5, 2010 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated April 28 through May 11, 2010, and payroll ending May 11, 2010, for the total amount of $4,206,231.96. L3. Approval to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the installation of traffc signals at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Church Street and Signal Interconnect System on Haven Avenue from Alta Loma Drive to Wilson Avenue, to be funded from Transportation Fund 124, Acct. No. 1124303-5650/1625124-0 and 1 1 2430 3-56 50/1 6 741 24-0. RESOLUTION NO. 10-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND CHURCH STREET AND SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON HAVEN AVENUE FROM ALTA LOMA DRIVE TO WILSON AVENUE IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 5 of 16 L4. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Executive Management Group for Fiscal Year 2010-11. RESOLUTION NO. 10-058 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010- 11 L5. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General Employees for Fiscal Years 2010-11 and 2011-12. RESOLUTION NO. 10-059 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE MID- MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/ PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2010-11 AND 2011-12 L6. Approval of Community Services Update Report. L7. Approval of an Agreement for the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin All Star Game at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium on June 8th (practice game) and June 9, 2010 (game date). L8. Approval of an Installment Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley W ater District (CO 10-051) for FY 10/11 water service rate increase. L9. Approval of the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Fontana (CO 10-053) and City of Rancho Cucamonga for street widening of Cherry Avenue between Wilson/Beech Avenue and Hawker-Crawford Channel. L10. Approval of City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 10-Year Energy Efficiency Portfolio Plan as required by Assembly Bill 2021 (AB 2021). L11. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with RTK Architects, Inc. (CO 10-054/ RA 10- 008), of Los Angeles for the creation of the Fleet Shop CNG Modification Design Development, Construction Documents, Construction Administration and miscellaneous services in the amount of $33,000 ($30,900 contract amount plus a contingency of $2,100), to be funded from Acct. No. 1 0250 01-5 6 50/1 541 0 2 5-0 (Capital Reserve), and $22,000 ($20,600 contract amount plus a contingency of $1,400) to be funded from Acct. No. 2650801- 56 50/1 541 650-0 (Public Improvements - 2001 Tax Allocation Bond. L12. Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 36 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2006-00580, located at the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Smash, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 10-060 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2006-00580 Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 6 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. 10-061 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2006-00580 L13. Approval for authorization to seek bid proposals for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1 (General City), 2 (Victoria), 4 (Terra Vista), and 5 (Andover-Bedford Tot Lot). L14. Approval to accept the Red Hill Park Cobblestone Project, Contract No. 10-020 as complete, release the bonds, retain the Faithful Performance Bond to act as a Maintenance Guarantee Bond, and authorize the Public Works Services Director to fle a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $24,300. RESOLUTION NO. 10-062 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE "RED HILL PARK COBBLESTONE PROJECT" AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L15. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Cash Deposit for DRC2005-00905, located on the east side of White Oak Avenue cul-de-sac, south of Jersey Boulevard, submitted by Charles and Lawrence Karubian. L16. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2005-01060, located at the southerly terminus of Sierra Made Avenue, south of Ninth Street, submitted by National Community Renaissance of California. L17. Approval to release Faithful Performance Bond retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond for DRC2006-00692, located on the south side of Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue, submitted by Rancho Arrow Highway, LLC. L18. Approval to accept Improvements and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 16038 located on the west side of Klusman Avenue, north of Diamond Avenue, submitted by Klusman, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 10-063 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 16038 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L19. Approval to accept the Beryl Street Community Trail from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue improvements, Contract No. 09-082 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contact amount of $64,623.00. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 7 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. 10-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BERYL STREET COMMUNITY TRAIL FROM BANYAN STREET TO WILSON AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 09-082, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L20. Approval of Resolutions Pertaining to the November 2, 2010 General Election. RESOLUTION NO. 10-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON TUESDAY THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES, AND CONSOLIDATING SAID ELECTION WITH THE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON SAME DATE RESOLUTION NO. 10-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A CHARGE TO CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, FOR PREPARATION OF MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS OF THE CANDIDATE STATEMENT FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010 L21. Approval of Resolution supporting HR4812, the Local Jobs for America Act. RESOLUTION NO. 10-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING H.R. 4812, THE LOCAL JOBS FOR AMERICA ACT L22. Approval of Amended Fiscal Year 2009/10 Appropriations. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Michael, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or Councilmember. M1. DRC2009-00691 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Table 17.30.030 Use Regulations for Industrial Districts by removing Funeral and Crematory Services as a Conditionally Permitted Use in Subarea 4 (General Industrial District) and Subarea 6 (Industrial Park District), adding Crematory Services as a Conditionally Permitted Use in Subarea 14 (General Industrial District) and modifying the defnition of Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 8 of 16 Funeral and Crematory Services under Section 17.30.030. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 830 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2009-00691, AMENDING TABLE 17.30.030 USE REGULATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS BY REMOVING FUNERAL AND CREMATORY SERVICES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 4 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) AND SUBAREA 6 (INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT), ADDING CREMATORY SERVICES AS A CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 14 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT) AND MODIFYING THE DEFINITION OF FUNERAL AND CREMATORY SERVICES UNDER SECTION 17.30.030, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Williams to adopt Ordinance No. 830 for second reading. Motion carried 5-0. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ' CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DRC2007-00869 - THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -The City has completed the Draft 2010 General Plan Update and a Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (DPEIR) (State Clearinghouse Number 2000061027). The Final 2010 General Plan Update, the Final Program Environmental Impact Report, the Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Facts and Findings to support the Statement of Overriding Considerations have been reviewed by the Planning Commission at a public hearing and a recommendation has been forwarded to the City Council for this final action. RESOLUTION NO. 10-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE 2010 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (SCH 2000061027), ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM RESOLUTION NO. 10-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 2010 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report. In response to Councilmember Gutierrez, Mr. Troyer addressed the results of a telephone survey. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Troyer confirmed that the Planning Commission unanimously approved forwarding the document to the City Council for approval. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 9 of 16 Mayor Kurth opened the public hearing. Ed Dietl congratulated all involved in the creation of the General Plan Update. John Lyons noted that this process was drastically different, as there were many disagreements during the creation of the initial General Plan. He concurred with the document. In response to Councilmember Williams, Mr. Troyer confirmed that the document was on the Internet. Luana Hernandes stated that she participated in the process and commended staff for their hard work. Mayor Kurth closed the public hearing Councilmember Williams was pleased with the amount of community involvement and noted that the document is complete and easy to understand. Councilmember Spagnolo concurred, stating that this is a living document which will guide the City to build out. Councilmember Gutierrez appreciated the number of hours that everyone put into the creation of the update. He was also impressed with the number of residents who stated that they were content with the quality of life in the City. Mayor Pro Tem Michael concurred that the document only needed to be slightly modified and that no drastic changes were made. He thanked previous Councils who had a great vision for the City. Mayor Pro Tem Michael also noted that public input was essential and appreciated the Healthy Mind, Body and Earth guiding principals included in the General Plan update. Mayor Kurth concurred, noting that it was exciting living in this great City. He commended everyone for the completion of a meaningful process. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez, to adopt Resolution Nos. 10-068 and 10-069. Motion carried 5-0. N2. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REVOKE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00283R FOR LOCO CANTINA & GRILL - A public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit because it is operating in a manner which is detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The City Council will consider the appeal and may uphold or rescind the revocation or modify the Conditional Use Permit. Located in the Masi Plaza center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-011-38. Related File: Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284. (Continued from April 21, 2010 per applicant's request. As this meeting was not held, item was re-advertised to be heard on May 19, 2010.) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2007-00284R FOR LOCO CANTINA & GRILL - A public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Entertainment Permit because it is operating in a manner which is detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The City Council will consider the appeal and may uphold or rescind the revocation or suspend or modify the Entertainment Permit. Located in the Masi Plaza center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-011-38. Related File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00283R. (Continued from April 21, 2010 per applicant's request. As this meeting was not held, item was re-advertised to be heard on May 19, 2010.) RESOLUTION NO. 10-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 10 of 16 THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00283R EL LOCO CANTINA & GRILL, AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE MAST PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-011-38 RESOLUTION NO. 10-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2007-00284R, FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AND DANCING AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT USE IN THE MAST PLAZA CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0229-011-38 James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report Chief Cusimano introduced Deputy Nicholas Clark. Deputy Clark provided a PowerPoint presentation addressing layout of the restaurant, 150 square foot dance floor, hours of operation, advertising and information about several calls for service, including video of the restaurant with drinking and dancing. The presentation indicated that customers were consuming large amounts of alcohol, dancing outside the designated area and that the entertainment provided was not ancillary to the restaurant nor was it family-oriented. It was also reported that a security guard was not always present as conditioned and that the sale of alcoholic beverages exceeded food sales. In response to Councilmember Gutierrez, Mr. Troyer noted that they were approved to be a restaurant with incidental entertainment. It's clear that this is not the case. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Troyer confirmed that the entertainment should be family-oriented. The type of use shown on the video would be permitted in General-Commercial Zone. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Deputy Clark addressed the timeline of the review. Deputy Clark did not have information on the total number of calls for service. Mr. Troyer stated that only the serious incidents were identified in the staff report. Mayor Kurth opened the public hearing. Bruce Evans of Solomon, Saltsman & Jamieson, stated he represents the owners of Loco Cantina. His clients do not wish to fight anymore. Loco Cantina is willing to close if they are allowed to run out their lease in August. In addition they would make the changes they have already agreed to. If revocation is necessary, Mr. Evans stated that there are 26 people on the payroll that are out of a job. While Mr. Evans wanted to work with the City from the start and appreciated the City's position, he noted that his clients have due process rights. He indicated that most of the evidence is hearsay, as it was obtained on the Internet. The calls for service have not been substantiated and the selected reports that have been provided redacted all of the witness information. Lastly, there is a right to cross-examine witnesses, which has been denied to them. Mr. Evans displayed charts showing various restaurants and calls for service. Loco Cantina has far less severe calls for service than other restaurants. He noted that his clients have made dumb mistakes, they did not cancel the security guard contract but let it lapse. He asked that the Council not shut them down but with them to revolve the concerns. Councilmember Gutierrez noted the comment about chances and indicated that Omaha Jacks had fewer chances than Loco Cantina. He indicated the need to consider all establishments that are disturbing the tranquility of the City, not just Loco Cantina. In response, Mr. Evans noted that there were several hearings, but each time Loco Cantina has less calls for service than other establishments. Each time, the business made changes to the facility or operation to address concerns. Mr. Evans noted that food is always sold and objected to the percentage of food sales as hearsay. He provided information to the Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager for the record. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 11 of 16 Felipe Delapiedra, the previous owner, currently oversees the kitchen and believes that the restaurant has great potential. He noted that it is possible to improve the lunch and dinner menus so that it could be a greater success in the future. Jose Sambolin stated his home and business are in Rancho Cucamonga and he has investments here. He noted the City's well being is very important to him. He has worked with staff in 2008-09 to be a good business and he said they improved food sales, off-day sales, improved their police service call record, and stayed in compliance. He said in mid-2009 he contacted Planning fora 6-month compliance report. He said he was told they were in compliance. He said in 2009 they increased their annual sales by 7% in food sales and non-entertainment sales, his 2010 sales are even better, and he has 26 employees. He said they permanently affixed certain tables to the floor so that they cannot be moved, it is not a large building and he cannot stop people from dancing as they move around. He reported that the managers and employees all attended the ABC class and his intent was to comply. He said in 2009 he made corrections immediately as soon as he became aware of what needed to be corrected. Mr. Sambolin stated that the cancellation of the security guard was not intentional. There was just a lapse of 3 months. He said any calls for service are bad but the records show that Loco Cantina is better than other businesses. There are areas that need improvement. He noted that there are 26 employees who would suffer as a result of revocation. He said there are no jobs out there and that his business generates 1 million dollars in tax revenue and there is already a vacancy problem in Rancho. He said revocation would have a negative impact and he should be allowed an opportunity to correct the problems. He noted that just 6 months ago he had a good report. Julie Lazono is an employee with the company. The business takes pride in being a restaurant and in providing good customer service. The employees have been trained to offer water and food when alcohol is served. Ms. Lazono is 35 units away from getting her B.A. in Chemistry and this job is very important to her. Brian Bubble is a customer of Loco Cantina and has not seen any of the issues shown on the video. He cautioned the Council against relying on the video as many things placed on the Internet are for self- serving purposes. Brian Cook, General Manager of Loco Cantina, stressed the management experience at Loco Cantina. He noted that there are 26 employees at the restaurant. He agrees that the pictures look disturbing but reassured the City Council with his security expertise. However, Mr. Cook noted that incidents can happen anywhere and hoped that the City Council would reconsider the Planning Commission's decision. David Fiera is a customer of Loco Cantina. Closing a business is a tough decision and the City Council should work with businesses to resolve issues. Mayor Kurth inquired if the City Council had any questions. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Deputy Clark stated that he was not inside the restaurant. Mayor Pro Tem Michael wondered why they refused to provide their sales receipts. Deputy Clark stated that they contacted ABC, who took over that element of the investigation. Also discussed was the lack of a security guard. In response to Councilmember Spagnolo, Kit Bobko from Richards, Watson and Gerson indicated that he is representing staff in this matter. He addressed the contentions of the appeal, noting that the time given to review the materials was adequate. There were two continuances, which provided a longer period of time than the normal process. In response, Mr. Evans indicated that they had two weeks. He had asked for 30 days due to the volume of the material. He did address the hearsay objection previously. On Page #2 of the staff report to the Planning Commission, Mr. Evans noted that he has not been provided adequate documentation. He also believed that they are entitled to cross examine witnesses. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 12 of 16 Councilmember Gutierrez inquired about activities permitted in a Community Commercial Zone. Mr. Troyer noted that a bar with entertainment is not allowed and is only allowed in a General Commercial Zone. Discussion was held. Mayor Pro Tem Michael inquired if the Conditional Use Permit revokes their ability to sell liquor. Mr. Troyer indicated that they might still be able to sell beer and wine, subject to approval by ABC. The hours of operation were discussed, with Mr. Troyer stating that the business could operate as stipulated by the original Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Bobko stated that the record is complete with substantial evidence and noted that the City Council may revoke the CUP and the entertainment permit if warranted. He also addressed the defnition of due process, which is a meaningful opportunity to be heard. In an Administrative Proceeding, the formal rules of evidence do not apply nor is the City obligated to provide afull-blown trial. In this case, the City Council should decide if the appellant had the opportunity to be heard. If there are specific questions, they could be directed to the Chair and the Deputy or staff could answer them. Mr. Evans stated that he did not wish to provide a rebuttal. Mayor Kurth closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Michael stated that he has read the entire report thoroughly. Clearly, all the evidence shows that this establishment has turned into a nightclub. It concerns him that 26 people would be out of a job. Mayor Pro Tem Michael noted that businesses must operate in the proper manner. He supports upholding the Planning Commission's unanimous decision. Public safety is paramount and he was disturbed that Loco Cantina never logged a call for service during all of these incidents. Councilmember Williams concurred, noting that the loss of jobs is devastating. She noted that conscious choices were made and this is the consequence of those choices. Councilmember Williams concurred with the decision of the Planning Commission. Mayor Pro Tem Michael concluded his comments by firmly stating that Loco Cantina can be successful as a restaurant and should not have to automatically close its doors as a result of a decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit or Entertainment Permit. Councilmember Spagnolo stated that Loco Cantina has violated many conditions of approval, jeopardizing the health and well being of the public. Councilmember Gutierrez recognized that efforts have been made to try to control the situation. Felipe makes wonderful food and is an asset to the community. Councilmember Gutierrez understands their situation and hoped that they would try real hard to operate as a restaurant. Public Safety is a concern and the Councilmember requested that the Police Department provide a report outlining calls for service at Yard house and Buffalo Wild Wings. Mayor Kurth noted that the facts are crystal clear. Loco Cantina is operating outside of the permitted use. In response to the Mayor, D. Craig Fox, Deputy City Attorney, noted that if the Council wished to revoke the Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit, Resolutions would be prepared for the next meeting. MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to uphold the decision of the Planning Commission and direct staff to bring back Resolutions of denial. Motion carried 5-0. Recess: Mayor Kurth recessed the meeting at 10:18 p.m. Reconvene: Mayor Kurth reconvened the meeting at 10:26 p.m. with all City Council members present Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 13 of 16 N3. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE DEANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 7 Ingrid Bruce, Special District Manager, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Kurth, she confirmed that staff supports the recommended action. John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, noted that a separate report will be brought back to the City Council annexing this property into Landscape Maintenance District and Street Lighting District 8. Mayor Kurth opened the public hearing. With no-one wishing to speak, Mayor Kurth closed the public hearing MOTION: Moved by Michael, seconded by Gutierrez, to adopt Resolution No. 10-071. Motion carried 5- 0. ~. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THAT THE GOVERNOR SUSPEND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CALIFORNIA GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT OF 2006 (AB 32) AND ASSOCIATED STATUTES AND POLICIES Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Villenas indicated that the Legislature did not need to pass a law. He noted that this was at the Governor's discretion. Mayor Kurth requested that a report be placed on a future agenda requesting that this legislation be repealed. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 10-073. Motion carried 5-0. 02. REQUEST TO INITIATE MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00331 -CITY OF Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 14 of 16 RESOLUTION NO. 10-072 RESOLUTION NO. 10-073 17 24 17 30 17 32 AND 17.42 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPING. James Troyer, Planning Director, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Troyer stated that a meeting would be held with stakeholders to discuss sustainable landscaping standards. Councilmember Gutierrez noted that the standards need to be very well thought out. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to direct staff to move forward with Municipal Code Amendment DRC2010-00331. Motion carried 5-0. 03. John Gillison, Deputy City Manager, presented the staff report. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Michael, Mr. Gillison confrmed that it was not necessary to wait a full year (as indicated by a previous speaker) to initiate another Proposition 218 election. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Michael, to direct staff to commence proceedings to establish Landscape Maintenance District 6-R and related Proposition 218 ballot procedures. Motion carried 5-0. ~~ P. COUNCIL BUSINESS ~~ The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Councilmember.) Councilmember Spagnolo noted that he had attended a breakfast in honor of local police officers and commended Deputy Robert Trostle. He also attended the Ron Ives Bicycle Rodeo, which was a huge success. Also, Councilmember Spagnolo attended Run for the Wall festivities. Councilmember Gutierrez indicated that the Relay for Life was on Saturday. He also enjoyed the Play School Graduation at the Epicenter on May 14, 2010. Councilmember Gutierrez encouraged each candidate to remove any illegal signs in the City. Lastly, he requested service clubs or youth groups to use the sidewalk system and report any graffiti that they find. Mayor Pro Tem Michael reported that last week, the Redevelopment Agency sent $32 Million to the State of California. He requested that all residents support the Local Taxpayer Protection Act. Mayor Pro Tem Michael indicated that he attended the 20 year Anniversary of Lifeway Church. Councilmember Williams stated that she attended Girl Scout Troop 11624's Bridging Ceremony. She reported that Cucamonga Challenge was a huge success and asked everyone to put May 7, 2011 on their calendars. Mayor Kurth concurred that the Cucamonga Challenge was very successful and that the Relay for Life was a great event. He also enjoyed the Ron Ives Bicycle Safety Rodeo, the Boy Scout Court of Honor ceremonies and the Run for the Wall festivities. Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identifed. Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 15 of 16 II R. ADJOURNMENT II Mayor Kurth adjourned the meeting at 11:03 p.m. in memory of Yesica Monica Gillison. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McKay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: ""' Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes May 19, 2010 -Page 16 of 16 RANCHO CUCAMONC.A REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY P-1 Agenda Check Register 5 /1 2120 1 0 through 525;?010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Atnount AP - 00296677 5/1220L0 A Sr I REPROGRAPHICS 36453 AP - 00296677 5(12,'2010 .4 & F REPROGRAPHICS 112.34 AP -00296677 5!1212010 A8c 1 REPROGRAPHKS 364.53 AP - 00296635 5/!2/2010 AECOM 137,219.98 AP - 00296702 5/12!2010 ASTORBROAUCAST GROUP !,063.00 AP - 00296704 Silt/2010 .4UFBAli CORPORATION 1,513.00 AP - 00296704 Srl2!ZU10 AUF'BAU CORPORATION 178.00 AP - 002967(15 5/122010 AUTO ANU KV SPECIALFS"CS INC. 26,000.00 AP -00296729 5!L2/2010 COSTARREAL,TY IN'ORMATION INC. 1,792.91 AP - 0029Ci759 5/L220'l0 FEDF_R.4L EXPRESS C:ORP 20.01 AP - 00296759 5/12/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.110 RP - 0(1296767 Silt/2010 G AND bl BiJS[NESS INTERIORS 16,966.63 AP - 0(1296767 5/12/2010 G AND M BUSINESS INT'F..RIORS 13237 .4P - 00296770 5/122010 GEOGRAPHICS 451.3 ( AF'-0029ti770 5ii2/2010 GEOGR.4PHICS 1,334.42 AP - 0029(,770 5/12!2010 GEOGR.4PHTCS 44.86 AP - 00296770 5/12!2010 GEOGRAPH[CS 233.27 .4P - 00296788 5/122010 INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCY 822,783.42 AP - 00296797 5/12201( JACOBS ENGENEERING 39,488.6 .4P - 00296808 5/i?2U 10 KSPA AM 1,067.00 AP - 00296809 5/t 2!2010 L E EI :4ND ASSOC[AT'ES 1,820.00 AP - 00296832 5(i2/2010 NiTJYC & MOORE 37,600.00 AP-002968>0 5/(212010 RESOURCESTRATECi(ESINC 5,220.00 .4P - (10296850 5!12;2010 RESC}URC:E STRATEGIES INC 11,96..13 AP-D0291iSG8 5/12!2010 SLGNSEIOP,'FHE 163J3 AF - 00296872 5!12!2010 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 950.00 AP - 00296880 5/12/2010 SOIiTHVdEST CONSTRUCTION CO INC 565,034.18 AP - 00296880 5/12i2(I10 SOUTEIW ES'F CONSTRUCTION CO MC -5(1,503.42 .4P - 00296896 5;12/2010 TROY ALARM INC 1.,766.84 AP - 00296903 5/12/2010 UM'I'EK TECHNOLC)GY INC 6,307.83 ,4P - 00296916 5!12.'2010 WEST END MATERL4L SUPPLY 899.90 AP - 00296945 5/!9,'2010 909 MAGAZINE 1,200.00 AP - 00296946 5/19!2010 .A & [REPROGRAPHICS 364.53 AP - 00296988 5/19/2010 DAN C,UERI2A ANU ASSOCLITES 19,590.00 AP - 00296989 5/!9/2010 DEALMAI{F.KS, THE 1,750.00 AP - 00'_96989 5/19/2010 DEAL6IAKERS, 1'HE 1,750.00 AP - 00297006 5?! 9.'2010 PRANCE PUT3LICA'T10NS INC. 3,100.95 AP - 0029701 U 5(192010 GOLDEN SOURCE [N'CERNATIONAL 1.814.85 AP - 00297016 5/19/2010 HILL AND KNOWL; FON INC 9,ti95.00 AP - 00297016 5;19/2010 HILL AND KNO W'LTON INC 2,410.20 .4P - 00297020 5/l9/2010 HOWARD R[DLEY COMPANY INC 49,769.50 AP - 00297020 5/l9/2010 HOWARD RIDLEY COMPANY [NC 1,563AO AP - (10297021 5/19/2010 HUNT DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC 1,020.00 AP - 00297022 S/19/2010 fEDC 477.00 .4P-00297031 5/!9/2070 KECCOMPANY 5,041.63 AP - 00297031 5/19/2010 KEC COMPANY -8(14.16 AP - (10297052 5/192010 ORANGE COCINTY BUSINESS JOURNAL 1,600.00 AP _ 002g7p52 5/l9/201( ORANGE COL.INCY BUSINESS IOURNAL 1,600.00 AP - (10297053 5/19/2010 ORCHARD CAPITAL I,P 29,265.8 7 AP - 002,97060 5/i9/2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMEF 4,74999 AP - (10297061 5/19!2010 R.4NCH0 CUCAMONG.A QCIAKES BASEBALL CL 165.00 AP - 00297064 5!19/2010 RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY 220.00 AP - 00297070 5/1)20 t0 RICHARDS bVATSON AND CiERS1iON' 874.50 AP - 00297070 5/19;20 i0 R[CEL4RDS W:ATSON AND GERSHON 49.50 User: VLOPEL -Veronica Lopez Page: I Current Date: 05/26/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ RL^G_PORTRAI T RC - CR: Agenda Check Regisrer Portrait Layout Time: 15:372 RANCHO CLJCAMONGA REllEVELOPMENT AGENCY Agenda Check Register 5/t 2/ZO I O dtrough 5/25/201 U Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AP - 00297070 5/19/2010 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON AP - 00297100 5/f 9/20 (0 UNION QANK OF CALIFORNIA Total for Check ID AP: Total fur F,ntity: CTser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Report:CK_.4GENDA_REG_PORTRA[T_RC - Cl:: Agenda Check Register Pottrait i,ayont P-2 Amount 3,957.28 804.16 1,771,402.62 7,77L,402.62 Current Date: USt26i2UI Time: 1>:i7i2 P-3 MEMORANDUM ~ ~ ~ ,~ CITY CLERKS OFFICE j~ANCHo Date: June 2, 2010 C,UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC, Records Managers/Assistant City Clerk By: Kathryn L. Scott, CMC, Assistant City Clerk Subject: APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR `rHE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL It is recommended the Agency/Fire Board/City Council direct staff to proceed with the biennial review of their Conflict of Interest Code. BACKGROUN DIANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Political Refonn Act, all local governments and agencies must update their Conflict of Interest Code in 2010. Prior to July 1, 2010, all Agency/Fire District/City staff will be notified of the pending update and will be requested to review any changes to designated positions, such as changes in title or duties, or creation or elimination of positions. Pursuant to state law, after a thorough review has been made, the City Clerk's Office will bring this item bads to the Agency/Fire Board/City Councl prior to October 1, 2010, to propose any appropriate amendments as needed. If amendments are needed, they must be approved by the Agency/Fire Board/City Council prior to December 30, 2010. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Re pectfully submitted, Z A/1~ Debra L. McKay, MMC Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.~RTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: ~ Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~aQ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Enginee~~ RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: ACCEPT THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-023 AS COMPLETE, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $98,495.66, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND APPROVE'A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency accept the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, ConVact No. RA09-023 as complete, approve the final contract amount of $98,495.66, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond and approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue scope of work consisted of planting of trees and shrubs, installation of irrigation and controllers, water meter, miscellaneous landscaping, PCC sidewalk and temporary A.C, sidewalk. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: Account Number: ? Engineer's Estimate: $120,000.00 2660801-5650/1743660-0 $127,159.00 - Redevelopment Agency's Approval to Advertise: November 4, 2009 7 Publish dates for local paper: D Bid.Opening: Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: November 10 and 17, 2009 November 24, 2009 December 16, 2009 America West Landscape Inc. P-4 P-5 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue June 2, 2010 Page 2 - Contract Amount: $99,297.79 10% Contingency: $9,929.78 - Final ContractAmount: $98,495.66 - Difference in Contract Amount: $-802.13 (-0.81%) The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of one Contract Change Order, the Balancing Statement. The notable change that was significant to the decrease of the Contract amount .was the lesser amount of sidewalk, cobble paving, concrete header and shrubs than originally bid. The Balancing Statement accounts for the minor decrease in the actual bid quantities. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Mark A: Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is Attachments P-6 t. ~ ~;: .\ `,'~. ~:. iiiiiix:i:x:wx::::nN ~•_, ~ 1.„NLL:Nl:O:,pl~ipx u,~,,.. uuuuuuununnnnu uuum:~~.'"~~ uuuuuuunnumnw uuuuun:T.~ F ~~~ miiiix - ~~nuiii ~~. $ ~~ b ~~IiiL ~~ ~ Vl ~: ` .~ ....~I UIL. S `. Ci -.,.. U ;,, W :. ti - - ~I.. ~ O ~ ~ ~,,.Y ssY, ..A ~. ~ .... W m ~ ~ 0. ( ~ ... w € ~ ~ Ems-` 31 4NVNLL3 1~ \ <! O ",~ U n n ~ ~ n W~ n 'a'ie x33ss' Ar f ~r" ~ n ... ¢' 7+~4 ....... rrv:a u it ...._ ?~:~ ___ ~' (, ~ ~ ~ ~ \ .. ................. w ~ 3nv N15ie00u a k::K sSW+:o ~ ~ ~ W ~~ c £' ~ ~ I I ~ ~ M ~ yv i3Mrkrv K!1 3nv : {) ~} s !G-1 ~ ~ ~` '~ man .. ~ ~;~ 3~m $ ~I~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ :, ~ Q ~ LL.U 3~Y N3nvx ~ y Y Nb1YN m u16a ~' ~„~ A W < ~ b]1N3] _ ~ ' O •I3 1 ~ 'v,r nsonef3q '~ r ne x ~ . • 3"0 ~ y ~~~p~jjj - "v,Y rnorvra ~~ i E Fhy G ~MY OlVtll LY 3/,Y O'IYBII~ (JV YI IIF""'VNNN"`III '3nv sxNi 3n ~ in rv+ ~ ;% ~~1 3nr NpMI'! ~ d m "dnv NYW113H,I /~ ~V /-: W o ,~ .mot ,.~tl p ~ ~ . ~~. ]A 6llvA xK 'V'v ONYA3MN b m 61 r / ~"-¢ 'a+n xv~r~ Nr] 3nY prrvxe~ro' / z tl ~r Nve N3aSOr ~ g x i ~ ~~ y~ q LL3 .~ 3WFdJVS ~ Apr' ~ '~~t N OvON 'JYJ 10NYtl P-7 RESOLUTION NO. RIB JD° d~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-023 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete, NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. STAFF REPORT Eri GI.NEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering SenriceslCity Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil EngineeQ~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant EngineerJ~~- -~{ P-8 ,r ~~~ jZANCxo CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 728181 P, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $993,284.00, FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 08-093 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 728181 P, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $993,284.00, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Grand Pacific Contractors, Inc. 680 N. Cota Street Corona, CA 92880 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is Attachment P-9 ~1\IJF DR r _c 1 ••~ H` r: . I i I HIlL51 E RD ILL IDE R i ~ I i i - ~n ' m 'tt$Gt qV WI O N AV NUOtJ ..V 6EEC ! I w ~ a C 6 ..~ 1 E w ' a N ~+ m tY B4 1J $T ~ \ N ~ r ~ w u' ~ I? )OFR I?tOF I?1 " w ~ @ w ~ d ~ GTORI ` ~ n 845E Ut ~ o w ~~ ~ 2 CHU . H 5 C ( ~' DHU CH .. ^ y ~- < F OTHI BL ~ F- ' ~, I > vQ 4R WR7 p ~ TH $ i ~ JERSEI' Bl . V B H5T = < i ~. i N 57 > 7H T -' ~ - 6 5 5T M a NTH 5 o a w PRO.iECT Vicinity Map Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail Phase S east of Etiwanda Ave. to I-1 ~ Free~alav STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP~IRTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineer' g~ ervices/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~ ~' RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. SU5025070, RETP.INED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BGND IN THE AMOUNT OF $702,684.10, FOR THE EPICENTER STADIUM SEAT REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA08-018 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. SU5025070, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $702,684.10, for the Epicenter Stadium Seat Replacement Project, Contract No. RA08-018. BACKGROUNDIANALYSlS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Herk Edwards Inc. P.O. Box 4204 Torrance, CA 90505 Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P-10 MAS/JAD/SH:Is P-77 VICINITY MAP l~ t`~ CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMON6A P-12 STAFF REPORT ~-'~ ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP1IRT'vIENT '~~'~~' RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineera3 Subject: APPROVAL FOR AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE INCREASE TO CONTRACT NO. RA 09-017 IN THE AMOUNT OF $409,237.D0 TO JACOBS ENGINEERING, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,923.70 FOR CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO VINEYARD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM 2004 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TAX ALLOCATION BOND FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 2660801565011 189660-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the award and authorize the increase to Contract No. RA 09-017 in the amount of $409,237.00 to Jacobs Engineering, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $40,923.70 for construction support services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project; to be funded from 2004 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 26608015650/1189660-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This contract is for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project and for Jacobs Engineering to provide construction survey services which include technical support for submittal review and change orders for the design and construction of the pedestrian overcrossing and Cucamonga Creek Channel Bridge, attend meetings, and related support services. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MASlCB:Is Attachment P-1 VICINITY MAP ~.. ~i r I I~ ~ I ~u HILLSI E ~LJIJ~ i ~ l I I i ~ ~ ILSO AVE ~ 24TH ST ~. '\ ~ ~ BAN N ST ~ ^ ¢ ~ ... ~ SUMMIT A ~•` a MO ~ ~ VE~ < tiQ ^ x HIGH ~ D AV 30 19TH T \. 30 ~ w 3 t• a N I I~ Y VICTORI PARK ',v ILJI B LINE D IL,11 ~ ~ w ~'~ ~ L_.1^ CHU H ST ERRA IST ~ ~ PROJECT SIT " I ~i OOTHIL m a BLVD ¢ ¢ ~ °~ ,,,, ~~ ~ I SAN 6TH ST L._JJ I I ~ ~~~ . . '._~I._..L .. I 4TH STiI.. _.. JJ.. I~x..-.. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STREET WIDENING,, ~~-. EAST UPLAND UNDERPASS BRIDGE ' ~ N REMOVAL AND PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS x.T.s. P-14 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 C,,UCAMONGA . To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering ServiceslCity Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer ~~ Subject: APPROVAL FOR AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE INCREASE TO CONTRACT NO. RA 07-113 IN THE AMOUNT OF $465,000.00 TO DAN GUERRA AND ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $46,500.00 FOR CONSTRUCTION SURVEY SERVICES FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO VINEYARD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM 2004 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TAX ALLOCATION BOND FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 2660801565011189660-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve to Contract No. RA 07-113 in the amourit of $465,000.00 authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the ar survey services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian E Improvement Project, to be funded from 2004 Public Impr~ Account No. 26608015650/1189660-0. BACKGROUNDfANALYSIS the award and authorize the increase to Dan Guerra and Associates, and count of $46,500.00 for construction ridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street >vement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, This contract is for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project and for Dan Guerra and Associates to provide construction survey services which include technical support for responses to the contractors requests for survey control, attend meetings, set and reset monuments and related general survey services. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB:Is Attachment VICINITY MAP ,, ~~~ . s~ P-1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STREET WIDENING, ~ ,; EAST UPLAND UNDERPASS BRIDGE r~ N REMOVAL AND PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS N.T.S. P-16 STAFF REPORT ~ - f ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPdR'I2VIENT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 G'UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer 6~ Subject: APPROVAL FOR AWARD OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $556,800.00 TO AUFBAU CORPORATION , AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,680.00 FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BIKE/PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, ROUTE 66 TRAILHEAD AND STREET IMPROVMENT PROJECT FROM SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO VINEYARD AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM 2004 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT TAX ALLOCATION BOND FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 26608015650/1189660-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $556,800.00 to Aufbau Corporation, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $55,680.00 for construction support and inspection services for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project, to be funded from 2004 Public Improvement Tax Allocation Bond Funds, Account No. 26608015650!1189660-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This contract is for the Foothill Boulevard Bike/Pedestrian Bridge, Route 66 Trailhead and Street Improvement Project and for Aufbau Corporation to provide construction inspection support, technical support for submittal reviews, processing of change orders and document control and related general engineering services. Respec II submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB:Is Attachment VICINITY MAP SAN ~~~ r " _ _ _ _~~'' ~u HILLSI E ~u P-17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD STREET WIDENING, EAST UPLAND UNDERPASS BRIDGE REMOVAL AND PEDESTRIAN OVERPASS ;.. rJ ~~, N.T.S. RANCHO C:LIC.AMC-NGA EIRE PRC-TEC'CiC-N DISTRLCT P-18 _Atenda Check Register 5//2(2010 through 1/25/2010 Check No. Check Dafe Vendor Nume Amount AP - 00296680 5!12/2010 ABLETRONICS 16.89 AP - 002966R3 1/12/2010 ADAPT CONS[1LTFNCi tNC 307.15 AP - 0029(1689 5!12/201 U ALL CITIES TOOLS 33.(10 AP-00296691 51/2/2010 ALSCO 289.03 ,4P-00296691 5!12r~010 ALSCO 300.21. AP - 00296691 5;1212010 ALSCO 282.69 AP-00296691 5!1212010 AL.SCU 44?.61 AP - 00296691 5!12/2010 ALSCO 335.57 AP - 00296691 5II2/2010 ALSCO 40 (.? I AP-00296700 5/1212010 ARROW STAFFING 24.20 AP - 00296700 5/12!2410 ARROW S"1'.4FFING 248.40 AP - 00296707 5/12;2010 BALL, ROBER"P 33.60 AP-U029b709 1/12!2010 BARTELASSOCIATFSLLC 1,850.00 AP - 00296710 5/12/2010 B.4UER C0141PRESSORS 77931 AP - 0029671 I S/L2.r2010 BLAZE OU"P E3:TINGUISHF_R CO 1,129.22 AP -00296719 51[2/2010 CARQUES"1' AUTO PARTS 107.48 AP-00296719 5/1212010 CARQUEST AUTOPAR'CS 278.79 AP -00296719 5//2/2010 C.42QUEST AUTO PARTS 172.56 AP - 00296719 5112/2010 CARQUEST AUTC PARTS 34.06 .4P - 00296719 ?%12!2010 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 60.70 AP - 00296728 5/12'20!0 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS (NC 1,000.00 AP-00396730 Silt/2010 COSTELLO,DENNISM 225.95 AP - 0029673? 5/1 2120 1 0 CUCAMONGA VALLEI' WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP-00396?40 5/12/3010 DANIELSTIRESERVICB 99.00 AP - UO^^(96784 1/12/20 10 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 1 1.72 .4P - 00296807 5/12/2010 K(\•tE FIRE APPARATUS 24.14 AP - 00296807 5//2/2010 KME FIRE APPARATUS 116.99 AP - U02968L I 1i 12/2010 L[PE ASSIST INC 285.61 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LO WES CONB'ANIGS INC. L71 ,4,P - 00296817 5//2/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. -1.71 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LO WES CObU'ANIES MC. 135.33 AP-00296817 7/12/2010 L,OWESCOMPANIESIiv`C. 169.45 AP-00296817 5/12/2010 LOWESCOMPANFESINC, -27.13 AP-00296817 5/l2/2010 LOWESCUMPAN[ES[NC:. 143.88 .4P - 00296817 Si l2/2010 LOWES COMPANIES [NC. 93.13 AP - 0029G817 1/12!2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 171.35 AP-002963(7 5//2/2010 LUWESCOMPANIESINC. '-,390.33 AP - 00296817 5/12!2010 L.UWL'S COMPANIES INC. 10.85 AP - 04296817 Si12/301D LOR'ES COMPANIES INC. 10.7 AP - 00296817 1;12/2010 L.OWES COMPANIES INC. `1 46 AP-00296811 5//2,'2010 LOWESCOMPANIES[NC. 29.32 AP - 00296817 1//2/2010 L,OWES COMPANIES ]NC. 33.T :1P - 00296817 5/l2%2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 130.29 AP - 00246818 5/!2/2010 MARLINK SA [NC (35.00 AP - 00296830 5!1.21201.0 NEXTEF_ 38.60 AP - 00246833 1/12/2010 OFFICE DEP01' 133.94 .4P-00296835 5/LZ/2010 GRCHARDSUPPLYFSARDWARE t>36 ' AP -00296846 5/!2;2010 RAMBA[1D, BRE'1' 328.64 AP - 00296871 1%12/2010 SMART AND FINAL 71.08 AP-00296891 5/12/2010 SMAKT:INDFINAL 79.53 AP - 00296871 5/12,'2010 SMART AND FINAL 95.72 AP -00296878 1/12/2010 SUU"I"(-[ERN CALIFORNIA EDlSON (152.11 AP - 00296878 5.'12/20 i0 SOUT'IIL'RN C:AL[FOILNIA Ell[SON 13262 AP-00296910 5/12/2010 VER[ZON 117.61 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lepez Page: 1 Current date: OS/26/20 Repor4:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTEiAI 'C_R(: - C'K: Agenda Checl. Register Portrait Lsryout Time: 15:38:0 RANCHO CUC:IMONGA FFRE PROTEC'CION DIS'FRiCT P-19 A~ectda Check Register Sl12r2010 fhrouLth 3 /2 513 0 1 0 Check No. ChecK Date VenAor Name Amount AP-002969 t0 Sil2/2010 VERIZON 37.74 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VERIZON 15.86 AP-00296910 5(1212010 VERIZON 475.02 .AP-00296929 5,'13!2010 ALLST,AR FIRE EQUIPMEN"f INC 1,303.07 AP-(IO29fi929 5/13/2010 ALLS'I'AR FIRE EQIJIPMENI' [NC 296.96 AP - 0029(,941 5/13/2010 LN CUR'CLS ANU SONS 599.35 AP - 00296941 5/13/2010 LN CIJRTIS AND SONS 3,(135.75 AP - 00296950 5%1912010 ACADEMY OF MUSIC 280.00 AP - 60296951 Si't9r'2010 ADAPT CONSULTING ENC 450.44 AP-00296958 5;1912010 ARROW STAFFING 264.60 AP - 00246976 5i 19/2010 CARQUF.ST AUTO PARTS 145.25 AP-00296976 5/l9!2010 C4RQUL-ST AUTO PARTS -145.25 AP-00296976 5!19/2010 CARQUEST.4UTUPARTS 30.59 Ai' - 00296985 Si 192010 COPIES & INK PK[NT[NG INC. 59:19 AP - 00296985 .5%19/2010 COPIES k INK PRINTING 1NC. 53.29 AP - 011296985 Si (912010 COPIES 8c INK PRINTING INC:. 53.'9 AP-002970(14 5/l9/201U FOOTHIL,LLAWNAhOWER 77,85 AP - 00297004 51'19/2010 POUTL[[LL LAWNMOWER 1195 AP-60297008 5/19/201(1 Gc^.idER~4LSERVECESAD(4LRti. 13.E AP - 60297027 5,'19.%%2(110 tNTERST:1TE BATTERIES 28591 AP - 0029702? 5/19/2010 INTERSTATE BATTERIES '285.91 AP - 60297027 5;19120 10 INTERSTATE. BATTERIES 285.90 AP - 00297027 5/19r'2010 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 285.90 AP-00297027 5;19/2010 [NTERSTATEBATTERIES ?55.90 AP - 60297027 5/14.'2010 CNTERSTATG BATTERIES 285.90 AP - (10297033 5/19/2610 LEA[, MICE{AEL 1,998.43 AP-00297037 5.19/2010 MCKESSONML-'UICALSURGICAL 266.85 AP-00?97037 S'!9/2010 MCKESSONMEDCCALSURGICAL, 58.20 AP-00297041 5/1920)0 tv1[JACALARMC:OMPANy 60.00 AP - 0029704'2 ~%1912016 MMASC 65.00 AP-00297049 5;19/2010 OFFtCHUEPO'T 7.63 AP-00297049 51[912010 OFFiCEDEPOT 129.05 AP - 00297049 5/191?OIO OFFICE DEPOT 310A5 AP - 00297067 5!19/2010 RELIABLE GRAPHICS 2,785.09 AP - 00297068 5!19/2010 RELM WIRELESS CORPORATION 413.29 AP - 00297069 i'iW20t0 RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGI' 220.00 .AP - 00297075 5x'19/2010 SC FUEi.S 9,266.99 AP - 00297078 5,xt9.x%2010 SC FUELS 1,702.40 AP - 00297078 ~%19!2010 SC FUELS 839.45 AP-00297078 5/19%2010 SC FUELS 3,147.92 AP - 60297078 5;192010 SC FCIELS [,259.1 S AP-00297078 5/19/201(1 SCFUEL.S 1,499.08 AC'-00297078 5/[9/2010 SCFUEL6 1,190.00 AP - 00297097 5/19/2010 "CERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 79!)0 AP - 002971 (( Sr'I9/2010 VER.IZON 11tIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP-002971{1 5/19/2010 VERILONWIRELESS-Lp 36.35 AP - 00297111 5,'1912010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 I 1 :/19/2010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 36.33 .4P - 002971 I l 5119; 2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 00297112 5/19/2010 VERIZON 3659 AP - 00297 t l 5 5%1912010 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 198.09 AP - 002971 15 5i 1912010 R%AX[E SANITARY SUPPLY 119.1 b AP - 002971 IS 5,'1912010 WA.X1E SANITARY SLIPPL.Y 157.35 AP - 00297115 5/19!2010 WAX[E SANITARY SUPPLY 357.49 C.Iser. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez YaRe: ~ Current Date: 05126%201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_f'ORTRAI' C_RC - CK: Agenda Checl: Register Porcraie Layout Time: 15:38:0 RANCHO CUC.'1MONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT p_yp Agenda Check Register 5/12/2010 thraugh 5/25/3010 Cfiec(c No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 002971 I5 5/19/2010 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 278.56 AP-00297115 5/19i20t0 LVAXIES.AN'['CARI'SL'PPLY 198.09 .4P - 002971 I S S(I)/201 U W:4XIE SANITARY SUPPLY 238.33 AP - 002971 l8 5/192010 W [N7_ER CORPORATION 124.69 AP - UD297122 5/20i2U10 KILMF,R, STEPHEN 1,902.33 AP - 00247123 5/20/2010 MORGAN, BYRON 1,779.19 Takil for Check [DAP: 53963.96 F:P - DOOOl079 520/2010 AHCJb1ADA, ALEXANDER R I,SOS.78 EP - 01)001080 520P2010 REMAND, C.,LOYD 716.20 EP - 00001081 5/20/2010 ARTHUR.. VERA r1. 193.36 EP-00001052 .5,'20,2010 BANTAU, VICTORL4 369.83 BP-00001082 5/20/2URl BANTAU, VIC'CORLA ~ 2,774.2 EP-00000053 520.'2010 BAZAL,SUS.4N 1,1.73.99 EP - 00001083 52D/20tU BAZ,AL, SUSAN 2.098.69 EP-00001084 5/20/2010 BERRY,DAV(U 72L34 EP-00001085 5/20%2010 B[L.LWGS;ESTER, l94.~3 EP-DO(iDtOSG .5/20/2010 CARNES,KENNE"i'H C(1G.53 F.'.P - 00001087 5/20/2010 CORCORAN; ROBERT 1,439.10 EP - OOOUI OS8 5/20/2010 COX, GEORGE' 491.72 EP - (N3U010$9 5/20/2010 COX, KARL 716.20 EP - 0000!090 5/20/2010 CRANE, RALPH 1,573.14 F_P-00001091 5/20r2U10 CRUSSLAND, VV'ILBUR 491.72 EP - OOOD1092 5/20/2010 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 667.05 BP - OD001043 5/20/2010 DUMINICK, SAMUEL, A. 1,439.10 F.,P-00001094 S/2(1/2010 EAGLESON,MICEIAEL. 1,902.33 EP - 00001095 5/20/2010 PRI-CCHEY, JOHN D. 72134 EP-00001096 S/20;2010 HEYDE,DONALD 1,4:9.10 EP-(10001097 5/20'2(1!0 [NTERLICC[I{A,ROSALYN 61431 EP _ 1}0001097 5202010 iNTEKLlCCHL4, ROS.4LYN 2,474.37 EP-00001098 5202010 LANE, WILLIAM 1,902.33 EP-QOD01099 520;2010 LEE, ALLAN I,IS6.7~ EP - 00001 t 00 52020 10 LONGO, JOE 19336 EP - UOODI 101 520/2010 LC1TI BULL, DARRELL 72!.34 F..I' - UUOOI 102 5/30/2010 MACKALL, BEN.IAMIN 193.36 EP - 0000[ Ill3 520,`2010 HAYFIELD, RON 2,466.58 EP - OOOOt 104 5/2020(0 MCKEE, JOIN 1,309.64 EP - 0000! l05 5/20/2010 YTCMILLEN, LINDA 430.75 EP - (10001105 520/2010 MCM[LLEN, L[NllA 556.35 EP - 00001106 520/2010 MCNE[L, KENNETH 1;139.10 EP - OOD01 107 5/2~~20L0 MICIiAEL, L. DENN[S 1,439.10 EP-OOUO1iD8 5/202010 MYSKOW,DENN(S 721.34 EP - 00001109 5/20/20IQ NAUHAN, MICHAEL 721.34 EP - 000011 10 5/20/201 U NEE, [tOtY 2,466.58 EP - OOD01 l 11 5202010 NELSON, MARY JANE 308.07 EP - 0000[ i L' 5/202010 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 720.34 EP - UG001113 5/202010 POST, MTCHAEL R 1,40L91 EP-00001114 52020t0 SALISBURY,"CHOMAS 721.34 EP - 000011 I S 5/'_0/2010 SMITH, RONALD 72134 EP-00001116 5/202010 SPAGNOL.O,SAM 491.72 EP-00001117 520/2010 SPAIN, WILLIAM 72134 EP - 0000[ l 18 5/20/2010 SCJLLIVAN, JAMES 804.98 EP - 00001 t 19 520/2010 Tr1YLOR, S1TVE 9`t`)~ 19 EP-DOOOi130 S/2020t0 TULEI',TERRY 1,439.10 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Dote: 05/26201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Poitsait Layout Time: 1538:0 R:1NCH0 CUCAn30N'GA FIRE PROTEC'C[ON DfSTFtiCT p_21 A«entta Check ReKister SiiJ2010 tftrough 5/25.'2010 Check No. Check Date Vender Name Amount EP-00001131 5/202010 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 1,439.10 EP - 00001 f 22 5/20!2010 WALKER, KENTETH ?05.60 EP - 0000 t 123 5/20/2010 WOLFE, DUANE 1,873.14 EY - 00001124 52(Ii2010 YOWELL, TID4OTHY A 2,466.58 Total for Check [D EP: 55,059.62 'total for Entity: 109,023.58 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pape: 4 Current Date: 05/26201 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRA[T_RL' - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:33:0 MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Date: June 2, 2010 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC, Records Managers/Assistant City Clerk By: Kathryn L. Scott, CMC, Assistant City Clerk Subject: APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the Agency/Fire Board/City Council direct staff to proceed with the biennial review of their Conflict of Interest Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Political Reform Act, all local governments and agencies must update their Conflict of Interest Code in 2010. Prior to July 1, 2010, all Agency/Fire DistricUCity staff will be notified of the pending update and will be requested to review any changes to designated positions, such as changes in title or duties, or creation or elimination of positions. Pursuant to state law, after a thorough review has been made, the City Clerk's Office will bring this item back to the Agency/Fire Board/City Council prior to October 1, 2010; to propose any appropriate amendments as needed. If amendments are needed, they must be approved by the Agency/Fire Board/City Couricil prior to December 30, 2010. Shouid you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, t Debra L. McKay, MMC Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUC,AMONGA P-23 ~~enda Check Register 5/12/2010 through 5/25/2010 Check No, Check Daie Vendor Name ~ Amount AP - 00296676 5/ 12/20 LO 909 NtAGAZLN'E 450.00 AP - 00296676 5/12/2010 909 MAGAZINE 2,SOO.OD AP - 00296678 5/12!2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,609.65 .4P - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R TFRE SERVICE 676.52 AP - 00296678 5!12/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.48 .4P - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R T[RE SERVICE 20.96 AP - 00296678 5/12/2010 A .AND R TIRE SERVICE 10 ~[8 AP - 00296678 5!L2/2010 A AND R T[RE SERVICE 10.48 AP - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R TFRE SERVICE 10.48 /1P - (1029fiG73 5!1.2/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE ~ 20.96 AP - 00296(178 5/12/2010 .A .AND R TIRE SERVICE 31.4 AP - 0029(1678 5!12/201.0 A r1ND R TIRE SERVICE 25.53 AP - 00296678 5/12,`2010 A AND R T[RB SERVICE 1,250.26 ,4P - 00296673 Si 1212010 A AND R TIRE SEItV[CE 10.48 Al' - 00296678 5112/20 f 0 A AND R TIRE SER V[CE 70.56 .4P - 00296678 5/I 2/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 69.95 AP - 0029Fi678 5/122010 .A ANll k TIRE. SERVICE 531.75 AP-00296678 5/12/2010 AANDRTIRESERVICE 30L01 AP - 00246678 5/12/2010 .4 AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.48 AP - 002966 73 5!12,`2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 261.99 AP - 00296678 5/12,'2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.48 AP - 00^_96678 5/1'2.!2010 A AND R T[RF, SERVICE '•0.48 .4P - 00296675 5/12!2010 .A AND R TIRE SERVICE -2~.~3 AP - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 25.53 .4P - 0029Gb78 5/12!2010 .4 AND R TIRE SERVICE 28.08 AP - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 10.48 .AP - 00296678 5/12/2010 A AND R TIRE SERVICE ~ 1,542.62 AP - 00296679 5/12/2010 AA EQUIPMENT REN'CALS CO [NC 338.32 AP - 00296680 5/12,!2010 AF3LETRONZCS 453.7E AP-00296680 5/(2/2010 ASLETRONICS (30.50 AP-00296681 5/12/30L0 ACTION AWARDSfNC. 1,109.08 AP - 00296682 5/12,'2010 ACTIVE GLASS CO 32.11 AP - 00296684 $/12/2010 AL)T SF..CLER[TY SERVICES [NC 11.43 AP - 0029668/1 5/12/2010 AE[-CASC ENGINEERING INC. 315.50 AP • 00296686 5/12/2010 AEI-CASC ENGINEERING [NC. 2,666.25 AP -00296687 5/12/2010 ,4GLJ[LERA, ISAIAH 260.00 AP - 00296688 Si 122010 ALDER; MA'C'CHE~' 500'00 AP - 00296639 5/12/2010 ALL CITIES TOOLS 50.85 AP - (1029(1689 5/12/2010 ALL CITIES TOOLS 122.89 AP - 00296690 5!12/2010 ALLSTAR AIR CONDITIONING 3c HEATING 2,869.69 .4P -(1029fi693 5.%l2/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIbfAL F[OSP[TAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LObL4 ANCRIAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/122010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5!12/2010 ALTA U)NU1.4NIh1AL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA L06ti4 ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOM.4 ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP-00296693 5/12/2010 ALTALOMAAN[MALHOSPITAL >O.UO 4P - 00296693 5!12/2010 ALTA LO(t-tA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/1220 [0 ALTA LOhtA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2(110 AL'CA LOIl4.4 ANIMA[. HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOM.4 ANIMAL [-[OSPETAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5!12.~?O10 ALTA 1.OMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 0(1296693 5;12(2010 AL,T9 LOMA .ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100AO AF' - 0029(,693 5/!2,'2010 AL'CA LOA4A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 Uscr: VLOI'EiL. -Veronica Lopez Page: I Currenf Date: 05/26/201 fteporE:(:K_AGENDA_ REG_POR'I'RAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layour 't'ime: 15:352 CITY OF ItANCIiE1 CUCANIO^t'CdA P-24 Aeentda Checi: Re>~istet• 5; (2/201 G tt,mugh 5!25/2010 Check No. Check [)ate Vendor Name Amaunf AP - 0029669'3 5; t2?2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1(?0.00 AF' - 00296E,93 5/12/2010 ALTA LOhIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/201 O ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL FU0.0D AP - 09296<i93 5!12/20!0 .ALTA LOR4A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - OG29(i693 5/i ^/2010 rt1,TA L,C)h1A ANiR~L4L HOSP['I'AL 100.00 AP - 00296693 ~/12i2010 AL't.4 LOhiA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/12(2010 AL"C :A L,OMA AMMAL. HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 0029(1693 5/12'2010 ALTA LOR3.A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 t/12,'2010 A[; CA LOMA ANCM.4L HOSPITAL 50.1)0 AP - 00246693 5!12/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSP[TAI. 50.00 AP - UU296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPCCAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOIvIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL, 100.00 AP - 00296693 5!12!2010 ALTA LOMA. ANFMAL HC}SPi"CAL 50.00 AP - 0029(1693 5!122010 AL."I A LOMA ANIMAL HC)SP17:AL 100.00 AP - 00296693 Sil2~`2010 AL;CALOMA ANIMAL. HOSPI'I•AL 25.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 AL'I•A LOMA ANIMAL FIOSP[7AL IOO.OC AP - 00296693 5/12!2010 ALTA E.OMA ANIMAL HOSF'[TAL 1(}0.00 AP - (10296693 S/12/20L0 AL'CA LOMA ANIMAL E[O5PI'CAL 25.00 AP - 0029ti6f13 5/l2/2U10 ALTA LOh".A ANFMAL HOS^-1Tr':L 50.00 AP - C1029669'3 Sil2/2019 ALTA L.OMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5!12,1010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL. HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 60296693 5;12/20!0 ALTA LOMA AN[M4L HOSPITAL SG.GO AP - 00296693 5/12i20I0 ALTA LC?MA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5%12/2010 AL'LA LOMA r1N'[MAL KOSPITAL Y UG.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOhtA ANI1vir1L HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 002960`93 5/I2/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL FOSPITAL 100.(10 AP - 00296643 Sr'l2!2010 ALTA LC)M.A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00296693 5112/2(1'f 0 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL KOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 >! 12'2010 ALTA LOhdA ANIMAL HOSP[Tr1L ! 00.00 AP - 0!7296693 5/(2/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL EIOSPII'AC.. 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/l2/201U ALTA LOM'A ANIMAL HOSP[.'T'AL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/1'2/20 (0 ALTA LO,MA AMMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12;2010 .4LT'A LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AY - OG29fi693 S; L2'2010 .4.L'CA LOhIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 >/12!2010 ALTA L064A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00246693 5/12'2010 ALTA L,OMA AMMAL FOSPITAL 50,00 AP-00296693 Sr1.2i201(1 ALTALOMAANIMALbFOSPTTA.L 50.00 AP-00296693 .5/12/2010 AL.TrlLOMAANIMALHOSi>[TAi., 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2070 ALTA LOMA .4NlMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP - 00296693 5/L2!20I0 ALTA LOMA AMMAL KOSPiTAL SOHO AP - U029(i693 5/12/2010 ALTA. LOhIA AN[M4L HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA i,OMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AF' - 00296693 511212010 AL'['A LOhiA ANIM~IL HOSPITAL !00.00 A.P-00296693 S/l2/20IU ALTALOMAAN[MALHOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2010 ALTA LOMAANEMAL HOSPITAL IG0.00 AP - 00246693 5/12.!2010 ALTA LOM.A ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP-00296693 5/12r20L0 ALTALOMAANIMALECOSPITAL SO.QO AP - 00296693 5/ (2/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - 0029(1693 5.!12/2010 ALTA LOMA ANI,\$AL I-[OSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296643 5/ 12/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSP['CAL 50.00 AP - 00296693 5%'t2/2010 ALTA LCJMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1U0.(H} AP - 00296693 51t ^</201 G ALTA LOMA ANIh1AL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP - (10296ti93 5(12/2010 ALTA LOMA ANIP4AL KOSP[TAL 25.60 AP - 00296693 >!IZi2010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 10200 User. VLOPEZ- Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Late: 05,26x201 lteport:CK_AGENDA_ KEG_PORTRAI T_RC-Gk:.AgendaChec(cReaistecPort,aitL~;~out Time: Li:35:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-25 Agenda C[teck Re~iyter 5/122010 throueh S/25/3010 Check Yo. Check Date VenAor Name Amount AP-00296693 5/122010 ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP-00296693 5/12;20!0 ALTALOP4.A.4NIMALHOSP[TAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 Si 12/2010 ALTA LOMA .4NIh4AL HOSPITAL 100.00 AP - 00296693 5/12/2610 ,4LTA LOM.4 ANID4AL HUSP[TAL 100.00 AP - 00396694 5/12/2010 AMSTERDAM PRINTING AND LITHO 82.95 AP. - 00296694 5/12/2610 AMSTERDAi\4 PRRJTING AND LITHO 151.26 AP - 00296695 5/L2/2010 ARfTECH ELF_VATOR SERVICES 440.00 AP - 0029[,696 S/12;2010 .4P.4CHE TRAILER INC 98.81 AP - 00296697 Si 12;2010 APPLIED h4E'fERING TECi1NOLOG[ES INC 8,113.00 .4P - 00296698 5/12/2010 ARAMARK [INIFOAM SERVICES 6.70 AP-0(129(1699 5(IZ/2010 ARC,HIVEh§ANAGEMENTSEAVICES(NC; 728.68 AP - 00296701 5i 12/2010 ASAP POWE'RSPOR'fS 245.00 AP - 00296703 S/12!'2010 A,TBc'C 0.08 AP-00296704 5/13/2010 A[IFBAUCORPORATION !3')00.00 AP - 00296704 5!12/2010 ACJFBALJ CORPORA`CION 623.00 AP - 00296706 .5,'12;?O10 AUTO RES'CORA'fORS 1NC 1.,653.64 AP-00296708 >,'P2i2010 BARBARA'SANSWEI~NGSERV[CE 589.67 AP - 00296712 5/12/2010 BRITE SMILE 528.79 AP-00296713 5/12!2010 BRO9dNBAGCO, i25A0 AP - 00296714 S/L2f201(7 8U5EY, iOHN F. 2.0(10.60 AP - 00296715 5/12/2010 C.AL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 614.87 .hP - 0029671 G' Si 12120(0 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 1,541.00 AP - 002967!7 5/12/2016 CAL[FORN[.A ELECTRONIC ENTRY 175.00 AP-002967(8 5!12,'2010 C.4REERSTRATEGIESTEMPORAfiY[NC. 1,218.70 AP - 00296720 5/12/2010 CARSON, AMY 625.00 :1P - (10296721 5;1220 (0 CTSNEAOS. HERNANDO 900.00 AP - 00296722 5/12/2010 CLEARR%ATER GRAPHICS 93S~2S ,4P - (1029672.3 5/122010 CLERK OF THE BOARD 2,792.25 AP - 00296724 5/12/2610 CL.IMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES CROUP 633.33 AP-00396725 ~'12/20f0 COAST RECREATION INC 374.02 AP - 00'296726 5/!2/2010 COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANIES 411.15 AP - 06296727 5.%12/2010 COPIES ~c INK FffiN'fING [NC. (,134.04 AP - 00296727 5;12/2010 COPIES <i'c INK PRINTING INC. -GO1 JS AP - 00296728 5;12/2(110 COST' RECC)VERY SYSTEMS INC 9,250.00 AP-00296731 5/12/2010 COVF,NAN'i"STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP • 0(1296731 $/12/2010 COVENANT' STAFFING INC. 355.60 AP - 00296731 S/1212010 COVENAN"[ STAFFING [NC. 6.67 AP - 00296T I 5/12!2010 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 533.40 AP - 0029673 ( S/!2(2010 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 121.49 AP-00?96731 5/12!2010 COVENANTSTAFF(NG[NC. 13.34 AP-00296731 5;!2/2010 COVENANT STAFFING [N C. 711.20 AP-00296731 5/122010 COVENANT STAFFING INC. 13.34 AP - 0(1296732 5112;30) 0 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 AP - 0029GT3 5/12/2010 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 2,462.42 AP - 00296733 5;12/2010 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 407.81 AP-00296733 5/!2/20[0 CROPPRODUCT[ONSERVICESINC 1,190.81 AP - 00296734 5/L2/"_'010 CCICAMONGA MUSIC CO. 150.00 AP - 00296737 5/122010 CUCAMONG.4 VALLEI' WATER DISTRICT 140.61 ,4P - 00296737 5/122010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.34 AI' - 00296737 5/122616 CUCAMONGA b'ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.63 .4P-00296737 5/122010 CLICAMONG.A VALLEY WATEItD[STRICT 30634 AP - t}0296737 5/!22010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 126.55 AP - 00296737 5;12/2010 CUCAD1ONCiA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.fi8 AP-00296737 5/12/201(1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRIC'i' 89.8_5_ _ Ltser: VL.OPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 0Si26r201 AGENDA ke ort:CK PORTRAIT REG Register Portrait Layoui Check RC - CK: Agenda Ticne: 15:35:2 _ p _ _ . . _ CITY OF I2ANCH0 CUCAMONGA P-26 A~~en(la Ctteck I2ezri.9ter 5/1212010 through 5/25/2070 Check No. Check Date VenAor Name Amount AP-00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAbfUNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 418.79 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VAT.LEY WATER UISTRICT 164.91 AP - 00296737 5112/2(110 CUCAMONCiA V:ILLEY WATER DISTRIC"C i 3.40 AF' - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DiS1'RICT 603.52 AP-(10296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERUISTRICT 2I?20 AP - 00296737 5/12!2010 CUCAMONGA VALT_EY WA'CER DISTRICT' 586.46 AP-00296737 5!12/2010 CUCAMONG.4VALLEYWATERDISTRICT 27(.20 AP - 00296/37 5/12/201 b CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER U[STR[CT 279.65 AP-00296737 Si(2/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERUISTR[CT 39605 .4P-00296737 5712/2010 CUC,4A4ONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRTCT' 603.72 AP-00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEI'WATERDISTRICT 433.00 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CLiCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT '3,42=8.40 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY \MATER DISTRICT 152,94 AP-00296737 SiI2/2010 CUC:.4MUNGAVALLEYW'.4TERD[STRICT 97.34 AP - 00296737 5?12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.71 AP-00296737 5%12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 34.19 AP - 0029673' 5!1212010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.13 AP - 00296737 5J12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 76.82 AP•0029<>737 5,'12/20(0 CUC.4MONG.AVALLEYW:ITEP~ULSTRICT 44.1<f AP-00296737 5'12/2Ct10 CUCAMONCiAVALLEYW'AT'ERD[STRICT 339.21 AP-00296737 x'12/2010 CUCAMONG,4VALLEYWATERDISTRICT 22'•15 .4P - 00296737 5!12/2(110 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 371.39 AP - 00296737 5/12120(0 CUCAMONGA VALLEI' \VATER DISTRICT 302.46 .4P - 00296737 5!12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY' WA'CER DISTRICT 38252 AP-00296737 >!I2.!2010 CUCAI\QONGAVALLEI'WATERDISTRiCT 9b2.1R AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.80 AP-00296737 5;12%20[0 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTK[CT 332.30 AP-00296737 5/!2,'20[0 CUCAMONCrA VALLEY WA'CER DISTPICT 398.00 AP-00296737 5%(2/2010 CUC.4MONGAVALLEYWATERDF5"CRICf !50.22 AP -0029(1737 5!12/2010 CCICAMONGA VALLEY WATt:.R UISTRICT 41736 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CIJCAMONGA, VALLEY W.4'I'I'iR U[S'CRICf 535.31 AP - 0(}296737 5/12/2010 C[JCAMONGA VAL.LI:Y WATER DIS'T'RICT 16627 AP-00296737 5/l2/201(1 CLICAMONGAVALLEYWAI't':RDTST'RICT L,I73.33 AP-00296737 5/1212010 CUC.'4MONGA VALLEY WA'CLR DISTRICT 60-5.55 AP -00296737 J/l2/2010 CUCAMONGA. VA1.,LEY W'A'CEK UISTRICT 57(}.65 AP-00296737 Slt2/2010 CIJC:IMONGA VALLEY WA'CP.I2 D[STRIC'f 516.62 AP - 00296'737 5r'12/20l0 CUCA(vfONGA VALC,EY W.ATF;R UISTRICT 41.29 AP - 0(1296737 5/12/2010 CI ICAMONGA VALL,L'Y W'ATF.,R U1S'fRIC'f 110.45 AY-00296737 5/1212010 CUCAMONC.iA VALLEY WATER.DLSTRICT Id751 AP-00296737 5/12;2010 CUCAMONGAV'ALLEYW.ATF.-.RUIS1'R[CT 410.46 .AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER UISTRICT b88.78 AP-00296737 5/12!2010 CUCAtvIONGA VALLEY WAT-ER.D[STRICT 279.53 AP - 00296?37 5/12/2010 CUCAMONCiA V"ALLEY WATER DISTRICT 492.68 AP-00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 2(}5.64 AP -00296737 5/'I^_/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY W%ATER DISTRICT 21.39 AP -1x)296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY \VATER DISTRICT 1,026.98 AP-00296737 S/l2/2010 CUCAMONGAV:1LLEYWATERD[STRICT 2139 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 290.43 AP - 00296737 5/12;2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 33222 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUC:AMONGA VALLEY \VATER DISTRICT 532.05 .4P - 00296737 5/12/2010 CCJC.AMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 318.30 AP -00296737 5!12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.!0 .4P-00296737 S.%1212010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 164.35 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D[S'CRICT - _ 95:8= ___ User: VLOPEZ - Vetronica Lopez Pagc: 4 Current Date: 05!26/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRA[ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Reoisier Portrait Layout Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF i2ANCH0 CUCAMONGA P-27 Anenda Check Register >ll2/2010 through 5/25/2010 (.:heck No. Check Date Vendor Name Amonnt AP - 00296737 S/l2/2OIO CUC.AMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.25 AP - 04296737 5/(2/2010 CUCAhtONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT l OLO6 AP-00296737 5!12!2010 CCIG\MONGA VALLEY WATERD[STR.ICT [?0.23 AP - 00296737 5/12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.1 l AP-00296737 5/12(20 L0 CUCAI~40NGA VALLEY WATERDISTRLCT 102.10 AP-00296737 5;12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 249.74 AP-00296737 Si12/2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATER.D[STRICT 354.97 AP - 00296737 S/l2/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.79 AP - 00296737 5;12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATEK DLSTRIC't 58.35 .4P.-00296737 Sil?i2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRSCI 136.07 AP-00296737 5/12(2010 CCICAMONGA VALLEY WATERDISTRiCT 114.89 .4P - 00296737 5.'12/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.40 AP-00296737 5/12/2010 CCICAMONGA VALLEY W'ATERDISTRICT 12322 AP -04296737 5/(2!30!0 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 134.69 AP - 00'_96737 Sll2/2U 10 CUCAA40NGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 451.47 AF' - 00296737 Si 1212010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2932( AP - 00296737 5/12/20 I0 CUCA6tONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT !45.87 AP-00296737 S/t?~2U10 CUCAMONGAVALL.EYWATERDISTRICT 35.73 AP - OC2^673 i 5/12/2010 CUCAMONC,.4 VALLEY WATER. D[STI'.ICT 127.89 AP - 00296738 >!I?2(IlU D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 636.19 AP - 00296733 5/I2/2010 D AND h CONCRETE COMPANY 390.42 AP - 40296739 x!122010 DAN GUERR.A AND ASSOCL4TEg 23,SOJ 00 :1P-00296741 5/12/2010 DELMECHAN[C.4L 222.50 AP - 40296742 S/12%2(110 DELTA llENT.AL 37,676.80 AP - 0029674 3 5/12/2010 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 125.00 AP - 002967•!4 5/12/2010 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VF.H[CLES i 8.00 AP - 00296745 5.12/20l(I llEPARTMEN'C OF T2ANSPURTriTION 2,130.64 AP-00296746 5/IZi2010 DILLON,STEWAI2'P S,OOO.itO AP - 00296747 Sit 2/201(1 C7LRECT EDGE CNC 196.41 AP - 00296748 Si 12/201 Q DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY' CORPORATION 251.26 AP - 00296748 >/12/20l0 DISPENSING TlCEINOLOGY CORPORATION -96.09 AP - Dd2.96749 5/12/2010 DUAR'CE, JUDY IU0.00 AP - 00296750 5/!2/2010 DUNK EDWARDS CORPORATION 94.66 AP - 00296751 5/!2/2010 ELLIS ENTF.,RPRLSES 980A0 AP-(}029675L S/L2(2010 ELI:ISEN"iERi?RISES 70.00 AP - 00296752 5/12/2010 EMPLRE LINE-X 635.00 AP - 00296753 5!(2/2010 F.,RGUN ASPH.4I_'P AND EMULSIONS 195.69 .AP -00296754 5/l2/20!0 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 58',.17 AP -00296755 5/l2/201U EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SF.RVICF.; CO. 353.12 AP-00296756 5!12/2010 EXPF..RIAN 52.04 AP - (10296757 5/f 2/30] 0 FAC'fOFiCO C/U TRAFFIC OPERAATIONS tNC 4,345.38 AP - 0029675 7 S; l2/2010 FACTORCO Ci01'RAFFIC OPERATIONS INC 3,23 L00 AP - 00296758 5/122010 FA5TENAL COMPANY 68.34 AP - 00246759 5'12/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS COR.P 2 f S l AP - 00296759 51'12/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 16.86 AP - 00296759 5/12/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.00 AP - 00296759 5/122010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD 1686 AP - 00296760 5/12/2010 FEDERAL JOBS DICES"I 112.50 AP - 00296761 5/1 ^/2010 PLEGF SERVICES INC. 10.43 AP - 0029C>762 5/!2/2010 FONG. NANCY 7,245.00 AP - 00296763 5/12/2010 FUOTHII_L CHAPTER OP ICC 60.00 AP - 00296764 5/122010 FOREMOST SLLKSCREEN AND EMBROIDERY 3,290.82 AP - 00296764 5/12;2010 FOREMOST SILKSCKEEN AND EMBROIDERY 185.67 AP - 00296764 5/12/2010 FOREMOST SILKSCREEN AND EMBROCDERY 4,879.88 User: V'LOPE'l- -Veron ica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: OS/26201 Report: CK_,4GENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Regisier Portrait Layout Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF itANCHO CUCAMONGA P-28 As;enda Check I2e~ister 5/ 12/2010 through 5/25/201 U Check No. Check t)ate Vendor Name Amount AP - 00296765 5/I2?2010 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 12724 AP - 00296765 5/12/2010 FRAZEE PANT (:'EN"f"EFt 276.60 AP - 0029b766 5/13/2010 G & J AIRCRAFT 41.98 .AP-00296768 5/42/2010 GALEGROIJP,THE 3128 AP - 0029<i76R 5.12!2010 GALE GROUP,THE 3 L28 AP-00296768 5!12/2010 GAL.EGROUP;FHE 61.37 AP - 00296768 5.!12/2010 GALE GROUP,T'I{E 62.00 AP-00296768 5!12!2010 GALEGROUP,TI-[E 3128 ,AP-00296769 Si12/^2U 10 G.AY,LORIANNE 20.0(1 AP -00296771 5/12/2010 GON7-ALEZ, SUEMy 800.00 AP-00296772 5/!2/2010 GOOD YEAR SOCCER LEAGUE 1,334.00 AF-00296773 5;12/2010 GRAINGER 233.10 AP-00296773 5/(2/2010 GRAINGER 64.79 .AP-00296773 5/12/2010 GRAINGER 2~G.~d .AP-00296773 5/12!2010 GRAINGER 39.59 AF-00296773 1/12/2010 GRAINGER 652.39 AP-00296773 5!(2/2010 GRAINGER. 195.75 AP-00296773 5/122U10 GRAINGER 34.26 AP-0C2467T 5/12;2040 GRAINGER 70.66 .AP-00396773 5it2/2010 GRAINGER 29.43 AP - 0C296773 5/12/2010 GRAINGER 105.58 AP-00396773 $112,'2010 GRAINGER 180.27 AP - 00296774 5/12/2010 GRANT III, VINCENT 442.00 AP-00296775 5!122010 GRAPHECSFACTURl'PRIN"C[NG[NC. 1,457.25 AP - 00296775 5/12/2010 GRAFHICS FACTORY Pft[NTING INC. 39694 AP - 00'96'/75 5/l.Z/2010 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 201.19 AP - 0029677b 5/12/2010 GRAY' MANUFACTURING CO TNC 2,435.94 ,AP - 00296777 5/12/2010 HIGH STAR CONSTRCIC'['ION 20.00 .AP - 00296778 5/!2/2010 HILLS FE'P NUTRITION SALES INC 283.36 AP-0U2467?9 5112%2010 HOGLE-IRELAND 45,379.86 AP - 00296780 Si 12/2010 F10ME DEPOT CREDt't' SERVICES 150.08 AP -00296780 5/12/2010 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 169.49 AP - 00296780 5/122010 HOME DEPOT CRGD[T' SERVICES -12 `J5 AP - 00296780 5!12720[0 HOME DEPOT CRED['C SERVICES 407.39 AP - 00296781 5/12/2010 HOOD, KARYF.. 24.SR AP - 00296782 5/ 12/2010 HOWARD, ZACHARY 264.00 AP - 00296783 5/1212(110 HOWELL, DORO'T'HY 100.00 AP-00296785 5112/20 t0 HSBCBLISINESSSOLUT[ONS 5(3.57 AP - 00296785 5/12/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1>.57 AP - 00296785 5/t2,~2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS -10.10 AP - 00296785 5/12x2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 373.18 AP - 0029678> 5 /1 2120 1 0 FISBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 83.Sd AP - (10296785 5/12/2010 HSBC BLISINL'SS SOLUTIONS 228.44 AP - 00296785 5/12/2010 FISBC BUSINESS SOI,LITIONS 60.63 AP -t10296785 5/12/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 122.35 AP - 00296785 ),'12/2010 HSBC BUSINESS SULIJTIONS 125.82 AP -00296785 S/122(110 }3SBC BUSINESS SOLLPT'CONg 190.63 AP - 04296785 5/122010 HSBC' BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 1699 AP-(10296785 S/122Ut0 l~{SB<;BUSINESSSOLUT[ONS 5756 AP -00296735 5/12/20!(1 FISBC BUSINESS SOLUTICNS 124.80 :aP-00296786 5/12/2010 FTUC;HES,RANCg 12.00 AP - 00296787 5/12/2010 [DEAL GLASS TINTING 330.00 AP - 00296789 $/12!2010 INLAND PRESORT K MACLINCr SERVICES 52.92 AP - 00296790 5/k2/2010 1NL,ANC) VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 36.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez L'age: 6 Current Date: 05/20'2(11 ReporbCK_AGENDA _REG_PORCRA[' t'_RC - Gli: Agenda Check Register Porp~ait Layout Time: 15:35:2 CIT'Y' OF RANC~IO CUCAIOZONtxA P-29 Agenda Clteck ReLister 5/I2/2010 through $/2S/2010 Cheak No. t;tieclc Fate ti'enttor Narne AmonEtk AP - 00296791 Si 1212010 CNPRO CORPORATION 3G.21 AP - 00296792 5(12:"2010 INTEGRATED TE.CIINOLOGY GROUP 2,418.48 AP - 00296792 5/12;2010 INTEGRATED TECEINOLDGY GROUP 2,418.47 AP-00'296793 5/12/2010 FNTERSTATEBA"CTERIES 117.13 r1P-00295794 Sr'1J2010 FN'CERVE'FCNC 4,445.50 AP-00296795 5/I2/20i0 INTEREA~ESTCON'SULTINGCiROUp[NC 1,$52.50 AP - 00295795 5(12!2010 [FVTER4VEST CONSUL'F'iNG GROUP LNC 1,R>2S0 AP-00295795 5/12/2010 J M SERVICES ?95.00 AP-00295796 5/i2/2010 J1418ERVCCL•-S 2,940.00 AP-00296798 5/12i20F0 .IDCCONCRETE. 39,288.00 AY-00295799 57k2/2010 .FLC(:;ONCRE'TECONSTR'U(:'TtON SOOAO AF-00296800 >ii2/20(0 .FOL9SAVAILABLEINC) 420.00 AP-OO29(i80f >/(2;'2010 .FOBS AVALLA.BLE. iNC -42 A0 AP - 0029680 L >%12/2010 FOHNS i'ONE $(JPPLY 2,370.21 AP - 00296$02 5~'12!20I0 ,FOSHU.4CASEY CORPORATE `TRAINING 2,050.00 AP-(10296802 5/12/20(0 )OSHUAC.ASEYCORPORATETRAINING 1,000.OG AP-0029fiR02 5/12/201(1 JOSHLJAC.ASEYCORPOP.A"CETRA.RJING 515.00 AP - 0029(1$03 5/ 12!2010 K &- B ENGINEERING 1,000.00 AP-00246804 5/I2r'2010 KANL4NINDUSTRIALTECILNOLf)GL9.S 520.10 AP - 0029fi805 S.'l2%2010 KATIPUNAN PSO AT UCR 200.00 AP-00296805 5((2/201(1 ICELLYE(?LIIPMENT 1,592.39 AP - 00296810 5/12/2010 LF~IBECK, KEN 109.00 AP - 002968 l2 Si t2/2010 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,2$5.00 AF - (10295812 5/12("2010 LITTLE BEAR PRODCFCTION5 350.00 AP-fl0246312 5i12Y10k0 LI9'I-L'cBEARPRODLJCTIONS 95.00 AP - 0029b8 t2 5112/2(1 i0 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 425.00 AP-00291812 5/t2/20(0 LIT'TLEBEARPRODUCTIONS 150.00 .4P - 00296812 5. I !201.0 L€TTLE BEAR FROIIUCT[ONS 325.00 AP - 00'296812 >il2/2010 LITTLE BEAR. PKOI)tJCTIONS 450.OG AP - 002468 E2 5112/2010 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.00 AP - 00296812 5/12/2010 LIT"TLF, BEAR PRODCIC;'FFONS i 75.00 AP - 00296812 5/i 2/20 E 0 LI`CI'LE. [SEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.OG AP-00296812 5!12;2010 I.,[T`f[,EBEARFROI)CJCT'fONS 250.OG AP - 00295812 5/i 212010 LI'TT(.,E BEAR PRODUCTTONS 150.(10 AF-00295812 5/12r'201U L.t'FTL,EBErlIL.PRODLICTIONS 295.00 AP-0023)5812 5/12/2010 L.tTTLEBE,4RPRODUCT[ONS E50.00 AP-00296812 >/I2."_010 LITTLE BEARPRODUCFFONS 150.00 AP-00296812 5/t2/2010 1.11"l-LtiBEARPRODUCT[ONS 4SU.GG .4P - (10296812 ~~12.%2010 L[TFLE BEAR PRODLIC'CtON3 275.00 AP - 00296812 5/1'212010 LI7"CLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 325.00 AP - OF.r2968't2 5/t2/2010 LPI"CLE. BEAR PRODUC'C[UNS 375.00 AP-002968 t2 5/12/2010 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 350AG AF-002968E Si12-2.0(0 LI'E'TLEBEARFRODUCTtONS 175.00 AP - 002968 t 2 5;12!2010 L.I'CFLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 AP - 00296812 5/12/2010 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 37?.0G AP - 002968 is 5!12/2010 L.UPE7; EDITF[ SALALAR 30.00 .4F-002968F4 5/12/2010 LOS ANGELES FREIGi-E'TLINER 29.80 AF-00296817 5/12.%201<{ I,OVY'ESCOMPANIESINC. 151St AP-002958 t7 5;12;2010 LOWESC:OMPAN[ESINC. 35.04 AP-00295817 5/(2/20l(t LOR~ESCOMPANIE5INC. 97.81 AP -00296817 5!12/2010 LO~'/ES COMPANIES [NC. 53.84 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LO~X~ES COMPANIES [NC. 39.65 AP-002.95817 5/52;2010 LOWESCOiv4PAl~1FESINC. Iy%48 AP - 0029681? 5/!2'2010 LOIb'E:S COMPANIES INC. 79.8"' - _ C~scr: VLOI'EZ Veronica Lopez Page: Current [3ate: OSi~6%20l Report:CK_ACiP:NI)A_ REG_I'OR'FR:1I T'_RC - CIC Ageucta Check Register Portrait Layout Time: t 535.2 CITY C9F RANCHC3 C,UCAMClNGA P-30 Agenda Check Re>~ister 5!(2;2(.)10 through Si'2,i/2010 Check No. Check Baie Vendor Name. Amount AP-00296817 5!t2i20I0 LOWESCOMPANEES[NC. 5..69 AP - 00246817 5/[2/Z01(t LOWES COMPANIES [NC. 67.93 EAP-00296817 SH2!201.4 LOWESCOMPANIESMC, 4502 AP - 00296817 5(12r2G10 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 36.89 AP-U029Ei817 5%12!20(6 L:OWESCUMPANtES[NC;. Fi3.88 AP-00296817 ~;12/2010 L.OWESCOMPANEF.S[NC. <t6.~7 AP - 0029(1817 5!L2%2010 LOW'ES COMPAN[ES INC. '4.88 AY - 002968 t 7 5/I2/2010 LOVES COMPANIES [NC. 30.30 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LOVJESCOR4T'AN[ESLNC• L8.38 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COMPANIES [NC. 13.00 AP - 00296817 5(12/2010 L.OWES COMPANIES INC. 138.55 AP-00296817 5;12!2610 LOWF9COMP:4NIESINC. 19.48 AP -00296817 5/122010 LOVdF.:S CUMPHNIF..S iNC. [ 1491 AP-G029C+817 >/t2/2010 LOWESCOMF'.4NtESINC. 93.00 AP - 00296817 5!I2t201G LOWBS COMT?ANTES INC. 32b0 .4P-00296817 5!i?,'201U LOWESCOMPAN[ESINC. 26.30 AP -00296817 5;12/20[6 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 64.4 AP -002968[7 5!12!2010 LOWES COMPANIES MC. 32.(14 AF-06295817 5112!20EO LOWESCUbtPANt.ESINC. 7•S9 .4P - 00296817 $!L/2010 LOtVES COMPANIES INC. 130. (? AP-00296817 5!12!ZOtO LOWESCOMPAN[ESINC. 95.85 AF-00296817 5/12/2010 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 30.09 AP -60296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 259.6'1 AP - 00'_96817 5;12!2010 LOWES CUMPANIES INC. 65.29 AP - 00296817 5/I2/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 40.65 AP - 00296817 ~'I2/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 32.54 AP - 00296817 ~/I2!20t0 LO4t'ES COMPANIES INC. 189.88 AP-00296817 5%12/2016 LOW'ESCUMPANIESINC. 77.21 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COMP.4N[ES INC.. 63.69 AP-00296817 5!L2;~010 LOWL'SCUMPAN[ESINC. 34.16 AP - 00296817 5/!2.'2610 LOWES COMP.4NIE5 [NC. 29.91 AP-00296817 S'12/2010 LOWESCUMPANIESINC. 20.99 AP-00296817 51!2/2010 LOWESCOMP.4NlY'.SINC. 212.94 AP - 00296817 S/12!2010 LOW'ES COMPANIES INC. 92.34 AF - 06296817 5/122010 LOWFS CON9F'ANIES INC. 66.82 AP-002968Li 5/12!2010 LOW'ESGOMPANIESINC. `6.42 AP - 002968 (7 5.!12/2610 LOt.VES COAPANIES [NC. 12.45 AP - 002968(7 5/!2/2010 LU~VES COMI'AN[ES [NC. `3.26 .4P - 00296817 Si 12.'3010 LO\VES COMPANIES fNC. 32 ^0 AP-06'_96817 5 t2/20L0 L.OWESCOMPAN[ESINC• f4.10 AP-60296817 5112/2010 LOWF,SCOMP.4NIL-S WC. ?9.73 AP-00246817 5!1212010 LOWESCURiPAN[ESINC. -12.14 AP-00296817 5112!2010 LO\VE5CORIPAN[ESINC. '_9.30 ?.P-00296817 5/12120(0 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 173 AP - 00296817 Si'l2/2010 LOWE5 COMPANIES [NC. 34.67 AP-00296817 5!122010 LOWESCOMPAN[ESINC. 103.99 AP-002968[7 5!t?/2010 LOWESCOMPAN[ES[NG 283.65 AP - 00296817 5/122016 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 85.12 AP - 00296817 5%122010 LOW'ES COMPANIES INC. 225.46 AP-00296817 5!l2/2010 LOWESCOhiPANiES[NC. 145.46 AP-60296817 5 12!20 LO LOW'ESCOMPANIESINC. t0.Rl AP - 002968!7 5/12/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 35,9? AP-00296817 >/12!20L0 LOGVESCURIP.4NIESINC. 1.04 AP - 002968[9 5/12;2010 LOW'ES COMPANIES [NC. ------ ---.._._.._- 52.62 --- -------------------------- ----------- ---------- ------ User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez ---------------------- Pape: 8 Current Date: OS/2(~2U1 Report:CK_AQENDA_REO_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portt~aii La}-out Time: 15:35 CI'PY OF RANCI30 CIJCAIVIOI_`IGA P-37 Agenda Check Resister t!1212010 through 5;2512010 Check No. Cheek Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00296817 5,`12/2670 LOWESCOMPAN[ESINC. ]0.8a AP -00296817 5/t2!2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 18.14 ,AP-00296$17 5,'12!2010 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 1738 AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COMPANIES fNC. 83.72 AP - OU"_96817 5iL2,'2{)10 LOWES COMP:~NFES INC. 12.31 AP - 002911817 5/12/2010 L.OWES COMPANIES INC. f 5.34 AP-OC129(i817 SiI2P2010 I.OWESCOMPANIES[NC. 22926 AP-0029C,R17 5!12/2010 LOIVES COMPAANES INC. 63.62 AP - 002968k7 5/12/2010 I-OWES COMPANIES INC, 76.85 AP-002968!7 5112/20/0 LOWESCOMPANIESINC. 218.80 AP - 002968 k 7 5:12,'2010 I,Ow'ES COMPANIES INC. 13.43 AP-00296$(7 5/12/2010 LOWESCUMPAN}E.SCNC. 75.74 AP-0029(1817 5;12,'20(0 LOWESCOMPAN(ESINC. 1L59 AP -00296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COMPAN[ES lNG. 8.66 AP-(10296817 5/12120k0 LOWESCOMPANIESWC. 58,66 AP - (,10296817 ?/12,°1010 l-OWES COMPANIES [NC. 39.02 AP-00296817 5/i2/20k0 L,OWESCOMPANFESINC, 3.85 AP-602968}7 5:12/2610 LOWESCOMPANIES[NC. 35.08 4P-00296817 5,!12/20k0 i.,OWESCOMI'ANIESINC. 9.53 AP-00296317 5/}2/2070 LOWESCOttifPANIESINC. 47.3L AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 L,UWES COMPAN[ES INC. 85.09 .AP - 00296817 5/12/2010 LOWES COi,-CPANIES [NC. '.44 AP - 00296817 5/(2/2010 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 197.09 AP - 002968 k 9 5112120 i 0 MARQUETTE COMMERCAI: FINANCE 1,774.$0 AP - 0029CrR (9 5/12/2010 ;~--IARQUETTE C00.-iMERCIAL FINANCE 682.95 AP - 00296819 5/t?/2010 MARQUETTE C'OMM1iRC[AL FINANCE 682.95 AP - 002968[9 5/12/2010 MARQUETTE COMMERCIAL F[NANCE 682.95 AP-002968k9 5/1.2/20 k0 MARQUETTECO<viME1tCIALFINANCE 682.45 AP-00296820 51[2:'2010 MARQL~7_~,MON[CA 60.00 AP-00296821 1!12/20(0 M.AR'fINEZUMONSERVICg 150.00 AP -00296321 5/12/20}0 MAR'CINE7., UN[ON SERVICE 45.00 AP - 00296822 ~l12/2010 M,ESI5CA. PATRICK 250.00 AP-00296823 5/12/2010 MIUWES'I"['APE 166,32 AP-00296823 5/12120!0 M[t?WEST TAPE 15.99 AP-00296823 5112:2010 MiDWESTTApE 84.56 AP-002911823 5!12/20L0 h4EDWEST"TAPE - 80.55 AP - (.}0206$23 5/12/2010 IvfIDWEST'IAk>E 60.36 AP - 00296823 5/i2/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 32.78 AP-0((296823 5/'k 2;2010 M[DW'E'.STTAPE 142.09 AP -00296823 .5,!12!2010 MIDWEST TAPE 75.94 :1P - 00296823 5; t2/'?010 hfIDWES"C TAPE 77 ~6 A.P - 0029682; Si I'2/2010 ~ M[DWEST TAPE 22.99 AP - 00`.«96823 5l1?/20}0 M.[DWEST TApE 29.99 AP-00296823 5/12/2010 M[UWESTTAPE }47.94 AF - 00296823 5;12,'2010 M[DWEST TAPE 19.99 AP - 00296823 5%]212010 RtIUWESTTAPE 64.95 AP-04296823 5/12!20}0 MIUVJESTTAF'B 179.67 AP-00296823 5l}2/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 23.99 AP-00296824 5!k 212010 M[SSIONREPROGRAPI}ICS 123.65 AP - 00296825 5/12;2010 MOL'NTA[N V[EW SMALL ENG REPAIR <i93.83 AP - 00296825 ,5,'12%2010 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REP.4[R 22.72 AP- 00296825 5/I2/2010 MOtJNTA[N VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR. -(00.00 AP-00296826 5/12/2010 MWIVETER}2JARYSUYPLY 764.63 AP-00296825 7/12!2010 MWI VETE.2INARYSUPPt.Y __r ..-- - -- --- __ - --~ --- - _..89 _ _ __ _ _. _ .- -.. _ .- Lksa~r: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez --..... Page: 9 Current Date: 05/26/20! Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PC)R"CRAI'F _RC - CK: AgenAa Check. Register Porerait Layout Time: 15:35:2 C'ITl' OF RANCHO CUCAA'[OIVGA P-32 Agenda Check ReL~isfer 5/(2/201(1 through ?/25!20(0 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP -00296826 5/12/2010 MW[ VETERINARY SUPPLY 12.{)4 AP - 00296826 5/!2/2010 MWI VETERINARY 3UpPLY 23.81 AP-00296826 5/(2/2010 MWR'L'-TERINARYSUPPLY 10.'9 AP-0029GS26 >/12/2010 MW7VETERINARYSUPPLy 104.26 AP-00296826 x!12/2(110 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 33.81 AP - 00296827 5/!2.'20(0 NAPA AUTO PARTS 519.49 AP - 00296827 5.'12/2010 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.74 AP - 00296827 5/!2!3010 NAPA AUTO PARTS 39.13 AP - 00296825 5!12/2010 NATIONAL MS SOCIETY SOLTHERN CALIFORN 2,000.(10 AP - 00296828 5112!2010 NATIONAL MS SOCIETY SOUTHERN CALIFORT; 23485 AP - 00296829 5%t2/2010 NEW COLOR. SCREEN PRINTING 413.25 AP - 00296830 >i'1212(110 NEX'CEL 915.82 AP - 00296831 5/L2/2010 NEXTG NGTWORKS 1NC 5,000.00 AP - 00296831 5/l2/2010 NEXTG NETWORKS lNC 5,000.00 AP - 00296833 5!1'2/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 35.29 AP - 00296833 5/12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 127.85 AP - 00296833 5/l2/ZOlO OFFICE DEPOT 277.18 AP -00296833 5/t2/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 108-(19 AP-00296833 5'12!20!0 OFFICE DEPOT 75.14 .4P-00296833 5/I2i20t0 OFF[CEDEPOT -47.63 AP - 00296833 5/12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 37.02 AF - 00296833 5/12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 473.82 AP - 00296833 Si12,"2010 OF'F1CE DEPOT 16.73 AP - 00296833 S/t212010 OFFICE DEPOT 145.58 AP-00296833 5/(2!20((1 OFFICEUEPOT 6L07 AF - 00296833 5/12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 1 136 AP - 00296833 5/12;2010 OFFICE DEPOT 614.9 AP - 00296833 5/12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 17.61 AP - 00296833 5/12'2010 OFFICE DEPOT 253.14 AP - 0029f,833 5/(2/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 104.68 AP - 00296833 5~'l2/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 161.3[ AP-00296833 5/(2/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 478.43 AP-00296833 5/12!2010 OFFICE DEPOT 3.78 AP - D029G833 5/!2.'2010 OFFICE DF.PO"[ 140.27 AP - 00296833 5!12/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 54.94 AP-00296833 5/12/20 t0 OFFICE DEPOT 6,262.26 AP - 00296833 ? 12/2010 OFFICE llEPO'C 130.02 AP-00296833 5/12/20 L0 OFFICE DEPOT -25.(9 AP - 00296834 5/12/3010 ONTARIO WINNBLSON CO 133.87 AP - 00296834 5/!2/2010 ONT.ARIU WINNELSON CO 68.99 .4P - (10296834 SIl2/2010 ONTARIO W[NNELSON CO 93 ~6 AP-00296834 5/!2/2010 ONTARIOWiNNEL,SONCO 16.18 .4P - 00296335 5/12/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY FIARDWARE 9.77 AP -00296835 5!12/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 20.83 AP - 00296835 5,'12/2010 ORCF[ARD SUPPLY" HARDWARE 5.43 AP - 00296835 5/l2/20(0 ORCf{ARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1520 AP - 00296835 5;12/3010 ORCkiARD SUPPLY HARD WAKE 16.70 AP-00296835 ~/l2/2010 ORCF[ARDSUPPL.YIiARDWARg 55.54 AP - 00296835 S/12/2010 ORCf-1.41ZD SUPPLY FIARDWARE 57.'8 AP - 00296835 5/12/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 29.47 AP - (10296835 5;12!2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 21.74 AP - 00296835 5/12/2410 ORCHARD SUPPLY F{.ARDWAI2E 2031 AP - 00296835 5/12/2010 ORCHARD SLiFPLY FIARDWARE 12-93 AP - 00296835 5/12/2010 ORCHARD $LJPPLY FIARDWARE l l.h User. V LOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pale. 10 Can•eot Date: OSi2G/201 Report:CK._AGENDA_ REG_POR'IEL4IT _RC - C.lh: Agenda. Cheek Register Portrtit Layout Time: 11:35:2 CITY OF I2ANCH0 CUCAIIRONG A P-33 .Asenda Check Resister 5/!2/201 U through 5/25/20 LO Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00296835 Si 12/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY FiARDtb'ARE 25.0 AP-00296855 5/12,"ZOID ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 70.19 .4P-00296835 S/12/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 47.81 AP - 00296835 5/l2/2010 ORCHARD 5(JPPLY HARDWARE 19.53 AP - 00296835 5/12/2010 ORCH,4RD SUPE'LY HARDWARE 75.87 AP - 0029CS35 5/12/2010 ORCHARll S(IPPLY I-L4RDIVARE 21.70 AP - 00296835 5.12/2010 ORCHARU SUPPLY HARDWARE 7.61 AP - 00296835 5/!2/2010 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 249.84 AP-00296836 5!12;2010 ORKiNPESTCONTROL, 300.00 AP - 00296836 5/12/2010 ORK.IN PEST CONTROL 1,458.46 AP - 00296836 5; !212010 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1.458.46 .4P - 00296837 5/12/2010 ORONA, P.4'LRICIA 1,00.00 AP - 00296837 5112/2010 OR.ONA. PA'IRCCL4 670.00 .4P-00296838 5/12/2010 OtYENELECTRICINC: 20.02 AP-00296838 5/12/Z010 OWENELECTkICINC 22.84 .4P - 00296839 >/12/2(110 P1P PR[NT[NU 280.68 AP-00296840 5!12,2010 PITNEYB011'g5 25,000.00 AP-00296841 Sil?i201U PRO-PLANETINDUSTRSAL SUPPLY 647.57 AP - 00296842 5. I2/2010 PkOA?OT10NS TEES & P:IORg 404.59 .4P-(1029684'_ 5/1?/20i0 PROMOTK)NS'I'EES~~:MORE 1,005.62 AP-00296842 S/l2/ZOl(1 PROMUTIONS'LEES&MOR.E 859.99 AF-00296843 S/L3/2010 PLB[..ICSURI'L,IJS 3,997.1.3 AP-00296844 5/12;2010 PIISFITA, IRENL' 20.00 AP - 0029Ei845 5/12/2010 R AND R AIJTOMOTTVE 40.75 AP - 00296845 5/!2/2010 R ANU R .AI.I'['OMOTNE 40J~ AP-00396845 ,5/12/2(110 R.ANDRAUTOMOTIVE 56.29 AP - 00296fi45 5/12%2010 R AND R ALITOMOTIV'E •40.75 AP - 00296845 5/12/2010 RAND [L AUTOMC}TINE 56.29 AP - 00296845 S/12i3010 R ANU R AU'T'OMOTIVE 97.50 AP - 00296845 S%I 212010 R .AND k AITf'OMOTIVE 74.80 AP - 00296845 5/12.)?0I0 R AND R AUTOlt?OTIVE 235.13 AP-00296845 5lI~'2010 RANDRAUTObfOT[VE 906.55 AP - 00296845 5/ 12/2010 R AND R.4UTOMOTNB 678.79 AP - 00296845 5/12/2010 k AND R AU"COMOTTVE 913.13 AP - 00296845 S%12/2010 R ANU R.4lfLOMOTNE 533.08 AP - 00296845 5/12/2010 R AND R AUTOMOTNE 991.54 .4P - 00296845 Si""!2/2010 R AND R AIJTOMO'LIVE 265.01 AP-00296845 SiI2,~2010 R.4NDRAUTOMOTIVE 235.13 AP-0029(1845 5/(2!2010 RANDRrIUTOA40T[VE 40.75 AP - 00296845 5/!2/2010 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 270.54 AP-00296845 51!2!2010 RAND RAUTOMOTIVE 514.79 AP - 00296845 5/12/2010 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 3522 AP-00296845 5/12/2010 R.ANDRAUTOMOTNE 194.37 AP -00296847 5/12/2010 RANCHO CUC.4MONGA PUBL[C LIBRARY POUt 700A0 AP-00296848 5/!2,"2010 kBMLOCKANDKEYSERV[CE 35.89 AP - 00296848 5/l2/2010 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 1 L42 ,4P - 00296849 Si 12/2010 READ THF_ BOOKS LLC 355.00 AP - 00296849 5/12/2010 READ THE BOOKS LLC 355.00 .4P-(10^_96851 511212010 R~ WHITE COINC 2;484.13 AP - 00246852 5/!2/2010 kiCHARUS WA"CSON .AND GERSHON 964.96 A.P - 00296852 5/12/2010 RICFiARDS W.4TSON AND GERSHON 2,058.40 AP - 00296852 5/12/2010 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 379.50 AP-(10296852 5/L2'20I0 RICHARDSWA't-SON ANDGERSHON 46,116.31 AP - 00296852 5/12/2010 RK'HARDS WATSON AND GERSI-ION 90.00 l.l;ter: VLOPE7 -Veronica C.opez Page: 1 1 Current Date: 04/26/201 Rapart:CK_AGENDA_ REG_P<?RTRAC C_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Porh'ait. f_ayout Ttme: 15:35:2 CIT'Y' t~F RANCH© CUCAMCINGA P-34 Af?enda Clnectd Register 5!13/2010 through 5/2$12010 Chaclc No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 0029Er853 51122010 ROBERTS, SHAUN,4 100.00 AP - 00296554 3/12!2010 ROBLES SR; RAUL P 75.00 ;1P - 00296854. 5!! 2/2010 ROBLES SR, RAUL P 75.00 AP - 00296855 >/12/201(i R.O't'ARY CORPORATION 238.03 ,4P - 00296856 5/12/2010 SAFELITE FCILFiLLIvtENT INC 207.15 AP-00296857 5/l2/2610 SAF'EWAYSIGNCOMPANY 271.88 AP-0(1296857 Slt2,"2010 SAPEWAYSIGNCC)hf'PANY 1,550.03 AP -00296$58 5/l2/2010 SAN AN"I-ONIO CONID2LINITY HOSPITAL 3,(121.32 AF' - 00296559 5/C2%2010 SAN F3ERNARDINO CO F[RE [aEPT 16.89 AP - 00296860 5.!122010 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERiF~FS C1EP'C 1 t,32 L67 AP - 00296861 5/12/2010 SAN BERNARDTNO COL'IN1'Y SHER.TFFS llEPT 222.42 AP-00296863 5/12/2010 SANBERNARDINOCOUN'Fy .56,9Ib.00 AP - 00296863 S/I ^22010 SAN BERNARDFNO C021N"I'Y 32332 AP - 00296864 5/12/20 f 0 SAN BF_-RNAKDINO CTY A UDITUR CON'IROI,Lg I R.00 AP - 00296865 S/12.%2010 SAN BERNARDiNO CIY FIRE DEPARTiv4ENT >7,035.50 AP -0029656(1 51121201.0 SAN P.ERN.4RD[NO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOC 250.00 AP -00296867 x'12/2010 SC FUEC.S 13,ti86.16 AP - 00296867 5;'2212010 SC FLIF.LS 9,910.67 AP - 002968(17 5/.2/2010 SC I'UELS 2,389.40 AP - E)0296869 5/12/2010 SIMPL,OT PARTNERS E;497_Y 6 AP - 00296869 5/12/2010 SiMPLOT PARIIVERS 80122 AP - 0029687(1 5/12/2010 SCNA'f"RA, MICHAEL l{)(L00 AP-Q0296572 5/C2i201U SOGIALVOCATIONALSERVICES 1,617.00 AP-(10296572 5/1212016 SOCIALVUCATIONALSEI2VICE9 73590 AP-00'L9C•873 51121201{) SOURC'EGRAP2~T1Cg 238.19 AP- 06296574 5it2/20LU SOUTH BAY FOUNDRY INC 75.00 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOLiTFTERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,025.58 AP-00296878 5/12!'_{)10 SOU'FHERNCALIFORNIAEDTSON 1,034.75 AP -00^^<46578 5/12;2010 SOL?'F2IERN C_4LiBORNIA EDISON 6,618.53 AP - 0(1396878 5112/'20(0 50UTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.53 AP - 00296878 5/72/2610 SOUTHERN CALIF'C)RNL4 EDISON' 15L05 AP - 0029tS878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CAL,IFORNLA ED[SON 2038 AP-00296578 1/12/2010 SOUT'HERNCALTFORNTAEDISON 21.11 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CAL1FOItNiA EDISUN 21.11 t1P - 00296378 x/12%2010 SOUTHF.'RN CALIFURNIA EDISON~ 2L[ I Af'-00296875 Silt%2010 S(?L?'LHERNCALIFORNIAF,I)ISON 21.90 AP -00296878 1!22/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21:26 AP-00296575 5/12/201{I SOCJ'T'FIERNCALIFORN[AEDISUN 2Lll f,P-00240878 `/[2/2010 SOUTHERNCALIFORN[AED[SON 78.38 AP - 00296878 5/122010 SUL'TFIERN CALIFORNIA EUISON 5194 AP-00294878 5/12/2010 SOIJTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON '1.11 AP-00296878 5!1212010 SUUTH.ERNCALIFORNIAED[SON 20.35 AP - 00296878 3/'!272010 SUCITT{ERN GAL.IFORN[A ED[SON 76.69 AP - 00296878 5/122010 SOUTI-CERN CAL[PORNEA ED{SUN 31'8 AP - 00296878 Si 12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~3 68 AP - 00^^<96S7S 5/12/2010 SUUTF{ERN C:ALIFURNIA EDISUN 89.43 AP-(10296878 5.'22/2070 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 21.11 AP - U0296S78 3;12/2010 SOU"CHERN CALFFORNI.4 EDISON 7322 AP-00296878 S/I2r2U1.0 SOIJTHERNCAL[FOFtNTAEDISON 21,11 AP - 00296878 5%12;201(1 SOC?IHERN CAL[FORNL4 L•DISON 20.35 AP -00346878 5/L212010 SOUTHERN CALIFOItNL4 EDISON 21.17 AP - 00296878 Si I2/2010 SOUTI IEI2N CAL[PORNh4 ADTSON 2033 AP - 00296878 5.!22/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.26 AP - 00296878 5/12/21310 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LDISON 3034 User: VLOPEZ -Veron ica Lopaz Pa~~e: I2 Current Date: OSi2b! ~01 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Parkrait Layout Time: 15:35 CITY CfF RANCHO CUCAI~IONG A P-35 At;entCst Cttecli ReLRSfer 5/ t 2P_U I U through 5/25201 U Check No. Check Rate VenAor Name Amount AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.84 AP-00296578 5/122010 SOUTHERNCALIFORNh4EDISON 107.85 AP - 00296878 5!122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00296378 51122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 93.58 AP-00296878 1/12/20(0 SOUTHERNCALIFORNTAEDISON 2Lll .4P-00296878 $1!2!2010 SOUTHERN CALTFURNIAE.DTSUN 23.11 AP - 00296878 5/122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.19 AP-00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 73'==? AP-00''_96878 5/12/ZUI(} SOU'CHERNCALIFORNIAED[SON 2223 AP-00296878 5/1?2U10 SOUTFTERNCAL[FURNiAEDISON 52.55 AP-00296878 5/122010 SOU'PI{ERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 43.72 AP - 00296375 5/122010 SOUTHERN CALlPORNL4 EDISUN '-2.63 AP - 00396878 5/12/201 U SOUTHERN CALFFOI2NIA ED(SON 22.09 AP - 00296578 5/I J2010 SOUTHERN CAI'-IFORNIA EDCSC)N 31.84 AP - 0(1296878 5;12/201(} SOLTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 22.04 .4P-00296878 5/122(}[0 S<)U'CHER.NCALTFORNL4EDISON 132.91 AP-0029(1573 5/(2/2010 SOUTHERNCAL[FURNIAEDISON 21.80 .AF - 00296875 5%1.22010 SOCTHERN C:AL[FC)RNIA EDISUN 21.30 AP-00296878 5!12,'20(0 SUUTI{ERNCAL[FORNIAEDISO.N 2L11 AP - 00296878 SrL'1,`?010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.26 AP - 00296578 5!12!20[0 SOOT}{ERN C.A.LIFORN[A EDTSON 51.86 AP - 00?96878 5/121^_010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED(SON 2223 AP-00296878 5/12/20!0 SOUTHERNCAL[FURNLA EDISUN` 2920 AP - 60296878 5/122010 SOUTHERN CAi-IFORNIA EDISUN 21.1 [ AP - 00296578 5/12/20!0 SOUTHERN C'AL[FORNIA EU[SON 95.40 AP-00396875 5/12r:S010 SOUTHERNCALIFORN[AED(SUN 2(.11 AP-00296578 5/122010 SULITHERNC.AL[FORMAEDISON 74.08 AP-00296878 5!12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 65.47 AP - 00296S78 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALLFORNIA ED[SON ''-l.99 AP - 00296878 srl2/201 U SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.1( AP - 00296878 5!122010 SOUTHERN GALTFORN[A EDCSON 21.11 AP-00296878 5/I2/20l0 SOLJTHERNCAL[FORNIAEll[SON 21.11 AP - 00296578 1/122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.84 AP - 00296878 5!12/2010 SOLJTF[ERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.9y AP - 002)6378 5/12!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON '31 • i 1 AP - 00296878 1i 122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 48.85 AP - 00296878 5i 1220 1 U SOUIHEf2N CALIFORNIA ED[SON 71.81 AP-00296878 5/l2/2010 SOUTHERNCAUFURNIAEDISON 90.0( AP -00296878 1/12/2010 SULITE{ERN CALIFORNTA EDISUN 154.78 AP-00296878 5!122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDTSON 3,735.91 AP - (10296878 5/12/20!0 SOU'T'HE,RN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80 AP-110296578 $. t2/20(0 SOUTiIERNCAL[FORNIAED[SUN 59.08 AP-00296878 5/12/2010 SOL'THER.NCALIFURN[AED[SON 28.92 AP-00296878 5/12/2010 SC)UTIiERNCAL[FURNIAED[SUN 134.40 AP - 00296878 5!12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFC)RNTA EDISON 65.91 AP - 00296878 5/l2/20I0 SOUTI{ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.69 AP-00296878 //122010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIALDISON 22.33 AP - 00296578 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.55 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.11 AP-00296878 5/122010 SUUTHERNC.4LIFORNIAED[SON 2LI1 AP - 00396878 5!!2!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.84 AP - 00296878 5/1220!0 SOUTHERN C'AL[FORNIA EDTSON 21.65 AP - 00296875 5/12!2010 SOUTHERN CALlFOIBJLA ED[SON 21.84 AP - 00296878 5/122010 SOUTHERN CALIFOTNIA EDISON ~'_A9 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pape: f 3 Curren[ Date: 05126/20( Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRA( T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:35:2 t:ITY O~+' ILr4NCHC1 CUCAniON'GA P-36 Agenda Check Register 5112120 t 0 through 5?25/2010 <'hectc No. Cltcck Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00296878 5!12!2010 SC)UTF[EItN CAL[FORNIA EDISON 41.85 AP - 0(12968 78 5+'1212010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. EDISON 21.1 I AP-00296878 Si12/20(0 SOUTHERNCA[.[FORN[AEDISON 27-12 AP - 00296878 5{l2/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNTA [D[SON 21.1 1 .4P - 0029687S ~/F2;2010 SOUTHERN CALIFC7RN(A EDISON 21.84 AP - 00296878 ~/l2/2010 SOUTPERN CAL:LORN[A 1:DISON 35.80 AP-002468;8 Silt/201p SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDiSON ZLIC AP - 00296578 5/l2/2010 SOLf'CHERN CALIFORNIA E":DLSON 25.06 AP-0029(18?R 5/12.r20L0 SOIJ"CHERNCALIFORNIAEDCSON 4,538.01 AP-0029fi878 51(272010 SOIJTHERNCAL[PORN[AEDISON !05.21 A.P - 00296878 Si 12/20 (0 SOUTHERN CAL[FOR.N[A ED[SON 14.05 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN G'lLIFORNIA GDISON ~ 93.18 AI' - 00296578 5/{2/2010 SOC.)THERN CALIFURN{A EDCSON 34.52 AP-00296878 5/(212010 SOIJTHERNC:AL[FOKNLABDLSON 104.14 AP -00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CAL.IFORNiA EDISON 134.20 AP - 00296878 Si 12;201 U SOUTHF,ItN CALIFORNIA ED[SON b1.51 AP-00296878 S/C2/2010 SOUTI4ERNCALIFORNIAEDIS<tN 2Ll[ AP - 00296878 5112/2010 SOUPIIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.24 AP - 00296878 5'12/2010 SOUTHERN CALL ORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP-00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHER.NCALLORNTAED[SON 434_<)4 AP - 00296878 5/!2/2010 SOUTI-FERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.1 t AP-(10296878 51[2/2010 SOCJTHEft.N CALLORNIA EP,ISON 21.80 AP -00296573 5/t2/20[0 SOCf"CI-TERN CAL[FORNIA EDISON '-1.1 [ AP-00296878 5/12;20[0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 21.84 AP-00296878 5!(2/20[0 SOUTT-{ERNC.ALIPORNLABDISON 21.84 AP - 0029fi87S 5/12/2010 SOLJTHER?I CALIFCiRNLS GD[SON 53.22 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CAL,IFORN[A EDISON 21.50 AP-00296878 Si 1.2;2010 SOUTHERNCAL.IFORIvLAGD[SON !43.47 AP-00296378 5;12,'2010 SOL.YFHERNC.4LIFORNI.AELT[SON 49.20 AP - 00296878 5;12/2010 SOU"1"HERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.80 AP-00296878 5/12/2010 SOUT[{ERNCAL.CF'ORN(AEDISON 57.02 AP - 00'_'96878 _5/12/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED150N 7,027.21 AP-00296378 5/l2/?_010 SOC(THE{L*i CALFORNIA LUi'SON 62.',2 AP -002968?8 5/12!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON [ 1.028.64 AP-00296378 Sit2?2010 SCJCPFFIE,I2NC:ALIFORNLALDISON 21.11 AP-00296873 5!12!20[0 SOU'1"HERNCA7~IFC)RNIAEDISON 2LLl A.P - 00296878 5)12/2010 SC)UTH,ERN CAL[FOI?NFA ED[SON 21.65 AP - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOU"FHERN C;AL[FORNIA ED(SON 352.3 .AF-00296578 5112;"2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNIA EDISON 23 93 AP - 00296878 5,!12/201(1 SOUTHERN LALLORNIA EDISON 272.T- AP - 00296878 >/l2/201.0 SOU"{'EIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.43 AP-U029l873 5/C2/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 2038 AP-00296878 5/12/20(0 SOUTFIPRNGAL[FORNIAED[SON 2038 AP-00296&78 5.C2.%%2010 SOUTHHRNGAL[FORNIAEDISON 20.38 AP - 00296878 5/'LZ!'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2038 AP-0029(878 5!12/201(1 SC)lfTI4ERNC,ALLFORNIAEDIgON 76.80 AP - 00296878 5/12J2010 SOUTHERN CAUFUIiN1A EDISON 20.18 AP - 00296878 5/!2/20 CO SOCTI-FERN CALIFORNIA EDISUN 21.26 AP - 00296878 5/'(2/20) 0 SOCJ`LFIERN CAL,IhORNLA EDISON 144.62 AP-00296878 5/t2/2010 SOUTHERNCALITORNIAED{SON 2261 AP - (10296875 5!12!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNCAA EDISON 63.46 :1P - 00296878 5/12/2010 SOLiTSERN CAL[hURNIA EDISON 5030 AP-00296878 5/!2,'2010 SOUTHERNCALIFORIV[AF,D[SON' 2199 AP-00296878 5/l2/2010 SOCrTI-IERNCALLFORN[AED[SON ~ 33.72 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lapel Page: 14 Current Date: 0 V2b'20l Report:CK_,AGENDA_ RECt_POI,tTRA{ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Red+,istee Pottiait Layout Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-37 Afendsk Chect~ ReKister 5/1 2720 1 0 through 5/252010 Chcclc No- Check Dale Vendor Name Amount AP - 00396878 5/12/2010 SOUTFISRN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 4Q 1 t AP-00296878 5/122010 SOLJTFiERNCAL[FORN[AEDISON 49.45 AP-00296879 5/(2201D SOCJTHERN CAL.IFORN1A Ell[SON 1,810.65 AP - 00296881 x/12;2010 SOUTHUBST REPRIGERAI'lON INC '-&~50 AP - 00296882 5/12/2010 SPARKLET"['S - 63.00 AP-00296883 5/122010 SPOONF'AC'I'ORy 210.00 AP - 00296884 5/1_2010 SPORTS SUPPLY GROUP 1NC 902.b3 .4P - 00296884 5;12/2010 SPORTS SUPPLY GROUP iNC 701.61 AP-t1029688x 5/122010 SW[NK,CFIARLENg 100.00 .4P - OU29b886 5112120 LO TARANTO CONSTRUCTION FNC 500.00 AP - 00296887 5/l2/2010 TF,ACHERS DISCOVERI' 179.00 AP - 00296888 Si 12!2010 TIGER DIRECT 637-08 AP - 00296889 5i 12/2010 TINT CITY W lN'ilOW TINTING 120.00 .4P - 00296889 5;122010 TINT CTTY WINDOW TINTING 260.00 AP - 00296889 5!l2/2010 TINT CI"CY WINDOV/ "fINT[NG 30.00 AP-00296890 5/t2201U TNTCONSUL,T[NG 351.75 .4P - 00296890 5/!2/20 l0 T'NT CONSULTING 417. l9 AP-0029b891 5!122010 TOOLSRUSINC X3.16 AP - OU29b891 5!12/2010 TOOLS R US [NC 34.46 AP-00296892 5/122010 TOPF,JOHN 75.00 AP - 0029689: 5/12(2010 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES [NC 288.73 AP - 00296894 x1122010 TRANS \VEST TRUCK CENTER 1;332.69 AP-00296595 5/l2/2DI0 TREMCO 4:475.00 AP - 00296897 5/12/2010 CJNIPIRST' UNIFORM SERVICE 115.90 AP - 00296897 5/122010 UN[FIRST [JN[FORM SERVTCE 734:}8 AP - 00296897 Si 12/2010 UNIFIRST UIVjFORM SERVICE 69834 AP-00296897 5!12/2010 UNIFiRS'fUNIFORMSERVICE 53.78 AP - 0029b897 5/'122010 IJNiFIRST- I tNIFORM SERVICE 19.00 AP - 00296897 5;122010 LRVIPIRS'i' IJNLF'ORM SERVICE 40.00 AP - 00^_96897 5!1312010 UNIFIRS'I' UNIFORM SERVICE 129.95 AP - 00296897 xiI2.~2010 LiNIFI1tST' UNIh'C)Rlvt SERVICE 40.D0 AP - U029b898 5/12,~2U! U UNION BANK OF CAt.,[FORNIA TRUSTTB FOR P, 49,442.27 AP - 00296899 5/!2/2010 UNION F3ANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUS'T'EE FOR P, 50,01 R. } I AP-00296900 5/122010 [JNIONBANKOFCAI.,IFORMA'FRUS"PEE FOR P; 259.71. AP -00296900 5/122010 UNION BANK OF C.4L,IFORNIA'fRUS'CF;E FOR P, 2,986.52 AP - 00296901 5;12/2010 UNITEL7 RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 359.114 AP-00296902 5/12201.0 LINITEL)'1'RAF"Elf; 2,3'31.03 AP - 00296904 5i 12/2010 UPS 45.64 AP-00296904 5/122010 UPS 32.99 AP - 0029b905 5/ 12/2010 IJTi 1,024.90 AP-00296906 5!12/2010 VASQCJEZ,DENtgg 22-5.00 AP-D0296907 5/122010 VASTA,WIT.,LIAM 19031 .4P - 002~i6908 5/12/2010 VERITEXT ORANGE COUNTY REPORTING CO 795.90 AP-00296909 5!12/2910 VER[ZON L8.34 AP - 00296909 5.112'2010 VERIZON 351.99 AP-00296909 ~ 5/12/2010 VERIZON 77.88 .4P-00296909 5!122(110 VER.IZON 36.19 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VER[ZON 36.59 AP-40296910 5/122010 VERIZON 37.74 AP-00296910 x/!2/2010 VERIZON 3,:20.77 AP-00296910 5/12/2010 VERIZON 13.33 AP - 00296910 5i 12.2010 V ERIZON 18.33 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VER[ZON 113.23 AP-0029Gn10 5/12/2010 VER[ZON ;46.35 l,ser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: (15/26201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTEL4I T_RC - CK: Ageuda Check Regisier Portrait Layout Time: 15:351? CITY QF R,ANCHO CUCrINtONGA P-38 Agenda Chec(z Register 5l t 2,'2010 through 5/25/2010 Check No. Check Date VenAor Name Amount AP - 00296410 5/12/2010 \%ER[7.ON 43.52 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VERIZON 48.52 AP - 00296910 5!12/2010 VER[ZON 69.26 .4P-0029b910 5/!2/2010 VER[ZON 4'_4-07 AP-00296910 5/12r2010 VER[7_ON 38.56 .4P-00296910 5/l2/30(0 VERIZON 37;4 AP - 00296910 5/f 2/2010 \BRIZON 18.85 AP - 00296910 5/12;2010 VERI7_ON 3659 AP-00296910 5/12/2010 VGRIZON 110.83 AP-00296910 Silt/2010 VERIZON 3659 AP-00296910 5!12(201.0 VERIZON 42.35 .4P - 0029b916 5/ 1212010 VERIZON (84.13 AP - 00296910 5/12!2010 VERl7_ON 38A1 Af'-00296910 5/(2/201.0 VER120N 36.59 AP-00296910 5/12/2010 VERVON 73.17 AP-00296910 5/12/2010 VERLZON 37.37 AP-00296910 5/12:2010 VEKIZON 23.77 AP-00296910 5/L2/2010 VERIZON 20.17 AP - 0029(1910 5!1212010 VERIZON 36.59 AP-U029C,910 SiL2i2U10 VERIZON 39.62 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VERIZON 15731 AP - 00296910 5/12/2010 VERIZON 37.74 AP-00296910 5!12/2010 VERIZON 37.74 AP - (10296910 5/12/2010 \%ER[ZON 20.17 AP - 0029691 I 5!12/2010 VILLAGE NUILCERIES W'I{OLESALE LLC 716.15 .4P-00296911 51'121201(1 V{LLAGENt([tSER{ESWHOLESALELLC 2(5.09 AP-002969(2 5/12/20!0 VOSS,STEPHANIE 57.50 AP - 00296913 Si 12/2010 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 25.39 .4P - 00296913 5/12/2010 W.4LTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 797•',3 AA - 00296914 5/12/2010 WAX[E SANITARY SUPPLY 57.87 AP-00296914 5/12/2010 N'.4XlESANITARY'SUPPLY 394.56 AP-00296914 5/12/20(0 W,4XIESAN[TARYSUPPLY 352.41 AP-00296914 5/12/2010 WAXIESAN(TARYSUPPLy LIOL'S AP - 00296914 5/12;2010 W',4X1E SANITARY SUPPLY 927.82 AP -06296915 5/12;2010 N+ESCO RECEIVABLES CO[tI' S~4,63 AP - 00'_96915 5!12/2010 R%ESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 163.13 AP - 002969 17 5/ 12/2010 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 23 L91 AP-00296918 5/l2/2010 WESTR.UKIN'I'ERIVAT[ONAL[NC; 33.97 AP-002969(9 5,'12,%2010 W[LBERT,D.4VID 300AO AP - 00296920 5/!2/2010 WILDLIFE COMPANY, "CHE 375.00 AP-00296921 >/i2/201U W[C,KERSON,SHEREE 172.00 AP-00296922 ~%12/20!0 W[SDOM,LINDA 100.00 AP - 00296923 5/LZ/2010 WORD MILL PCIBLISHLNG 725.60 AP - 00296924 .5/12/2010 WRIGfiT, PATR[C1A THAYER 10U.U0 AP - (}0296925 5/12/2610 YATES; RON 4.(10 AP - 00296926 5!12/2010 ZENG, MU DAN 250.00 AP-QU296927 5/13/2010 RASMUSSEN,MILT 40UA0 AP - 00296928 5/13/2010 .ABC LOCKSMITHS 372.45 AP-00296928 5/L'3/2010 ABCLOCKSM[TH5 35.39 AP - 00296928 5/l 3/2010 ABC L.OCKSMiTHS 3 L08 AP - 00296937 5113?2(110 BRODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS I I ~0 .4P-0029(1937 5!13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 1338 AP - 00296937 5/!3/2010 BRODART BOOKS __ 3 L42 User: VLUPEZ -Veronica [,opez Page: 16 Current Date: OS/2b1201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_POR'1'RAI "['_RC - Cii: Ageoda Check Register Por7aii Layout Time: 15:35:2 GCT'Y OF RANCk10 CLTC.4141CpNC.A P-39 Ai;entia Checi: ReLister 51 1 2120 1 0 through 5/25/2010 Check Na. Check Dafe Vendor Name Amount AP - 0{129(937 5?'L3/2010 BRODART` BOUKS 4.02 AP - 0029b937 5/l3/20U1 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00296937 5/1.32010 BRODART BOOKS 4.5- .4P - 00296937 5; t3/20 i 0 BRODART' BOOKS 4.51 AP - 0029Fi937 3?I.i%2010 BRODAR'1" BOOKS 4.51 .4P-00296937 ~?13r'20l{I BRODART'BOC)KS 4.51 AP-00296937 S/13:'Zl}t0 BR~ODARTBOOKS 13.38 AF'-002911937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'fBC3OKS 188.05 AP-0029b937 511320[0 BRODr1RTBOOKS 272! AP-(10296937 5/l.i/2010 BRODAKTBOOKS 7.05 AP - 00296937 S/13/201D BRCTDAR.T BOOKS 125.14 AP - 00246937 Si13/2010 BRODAR`C BOOKS 32.24 AP - 00246937 511.3/7.OI0 BROBAft"I' BOOKS 39. i 2 AI' - 00296937 5/1312010 BROC)AR'i' BOOKS 24.92 AP-002911937 5!132010 BRODARTBOOfCS 62.b1 AP-00296937 5;1320}0 BRC?DAR't'BOOKS 26.58 AP-00296937 5/13201(1 BRODARTBUOICS 2824 AP-00296937 5!l3/20(0 BROD.4R~T'BOOKS 22245 AP-0029b937 5!13/2010 BRODARTBC?O1;,S 6L.30 AP- 00296937 5?132010 BRODAR.T BOOKS 80-82 AP - 00296937 5.!1312010 BP.OUART BOOKS 40. t5 ,4P - 00296937 5?13/2010 BROD.4RT' BOOKS 28.27 AP-00296937 5/I3/2010 BRODAR'I'BOOKy 35.50 AP-00296937 S?132010 F3ROL)ARTBOOKS 62.20 AP - 00296937 511.1/20 € 0 BROUAR'F BOORS 1 t.30 AP - 00296937 5/1320f 0 BRODART BOOKS 70 ?9 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 44.0E AP-00296937 .5..'13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 14.69 AP -00'Z9Cs937 ,5 F3!2010 BROF)ART BOOKS 67.70 AP-00346937 S/1321)!0 BRODARTBOOKS 13.54 AP-00296937 5/13!20[0 B(2OT3ARTBOOKS 67.70 AP - 00296937 3/13!2(110 BROI7ART BOOKS 67.70 AP - 00296937 3;13,'2fi 10 BRODAR'C B(}OICS 270.80 AP-00296937 5/1312010 BRODARTBOOKS 230.!8 AP-00296937 5!13/2010 BROUAR'F'BO(`)KS !76,02 AP-00296937 5lL3/2.010 BR{')t)AR'PBUOKS 704.08 AP-00296937 5/!3.!30!0 BRODARTBOOKS 13.54 A,P - 00296937 5/!3%2010 BROI:)ART BOOKS 32.63 AP - 00246937 5/1312010 BRODART BOOKS 32L71 AP - 00296937 5; t3/2010 BROD.ART F3O0KS 23.46 AF-0029(1937 5!13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 121.73 A.P-00296937 5/€3/2010 BROL-SARTBOOKS 272.06 .AP - 00296437 5/t3.'ZOLO BRODART BOOKS 760.78 AF - 0029b937 5113/201(1 BRODART BOOKS 712.43 AP -00296937 51132010 BRODART BOOKS 592J 5 AP-00296937 5/13!2010 BROD.ARTBOOKS 2,156.33 AF' - 00296937 5.!1312010 BRODART BC)OKS 14.14 :AP - 00'29b937 5/13/2010 BROCART BOOKS 14. LO AP - 00296937 5/i 3/2010 BRC)DART BOOKS 176.36 AP - 002469 37 5/13/2010 BRODART' BOO[CS 2,296.80 AP - 00296937 5113;2010 BROU;IP.T' BOOKS 2,642.63 AP -00296937 5!13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 4.51 ;1P - 00296937 511 112010 BRODART BCiOKS 4.51 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BROUART BC1OKS 4.51 User: VLOPE7_ Veronica Lopez Page: t 7 Cnn-ent Date: 05/26/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ RECi_POR1'RAL 'f'_RC - CK: Agenda Chark Register Portrait La}'oui Time: 15:352 CI`fY OF RANC'.HO CITCAMONG:i P-40 ~,1~~•enda Check Retrister ?; t 2!3(11 O through 5/252010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 6.Rt AF - 00296937 5/13!20!0 BRODART BOOKS 86.81 AP - 00246937 Si 13/2010 BRODART BOOKS l 14.63 AP - 00296937 Si 13/2010 BROUART ROOKS 9.60 AP-00296937 5/1.3/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 127.73 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 289.18 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODARI- BOOKS 14.68 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUUART BOOKS 41.80 AP - 00296937 5/13/<'010 BRODART BOOKS 27.91 AP - 00296937 >i 1312010 BROD.4RT BOOKS 80.85 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 15.ti2 AP - 00296937 Si 13201 O BRUDART BOOKS 70.43 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 54.65 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAKTBOOKS 59.28 AF-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR"!'BOOKS 18.17 AP-00296937 5/132010 BRODARTBOOKS 33.26 AP -00296937 51L3lZOI0 BRUDAR'i BOOKS L5.62 ELP - (10296937 Si 1312010 BRODART BOOKS 700.55 AP - 60296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BUUI{S 27 ~4 AF' - 00396937 5/C3/201 U BRODAR'f BOOKS 28.19 AP - 00296937 5/li/2010 BRODA.R'f BOOKS 45.16 AF - (10296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 50.86 AP-00296937 5/13!2010 BROUARTBOOKS L4b7 AP - 0(1296937 Si I3/2010 BRODAR~T BOOKS 13.48 AP-00'296937 5/!3;2010 I3RODARTBOOKS _ 18.37 AP - f1029fi437 5i 13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 2,642.(3 AP-00296937 5/l3/20Ur BROUARTBOOKS 289.02 AP-00296937 5/13/20(.0 BRODARTBOOKS 5.37 AP -00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 1.4.19 AP - 0029(1937 5/1312010 BRODART BOOKS 128.70 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'r BOOKS 62.17 AP - 00296937 Si 13/20! 0 BRODAR"C BOOKS 44.09 AP-00296937 5/t3/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 25.24 AP -00296937 5/13!2010 BRODART BOOKS >836 AP-00296937 5/t 3/2010 BRODAIZTBOOKS 22.47 AP - 00296937 5113;2010 BRODART BOOKS GG.74 AP-00296937 5/!312010 BROD.4RTBOOKS 17.6 AP-00296937 5/13;2010 BRODARTBOOKS 95.01 .4P - 00296937 Si'13/2010 BRODAR'[' BOOKS 9.61 AP - 0029693 i 5/13(2010 B20DART BOOKS 46.57 AP - 00296937 :/!3/2010 BRODART BOOKS 205.34 AP - 00296937 5/i 3/2010 BRODART BOOKS 5.83 .4P - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS ''-50.`~ AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 157.56 .4P - (1029(1937 5/13%2(11.0 BRODART BOOKS 68.71 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOI{S 23.17 AP-00296937 >it320t0 BR.ODARTBOOKS 5$.46 AP - 00296937 5/l3/2010 BRODARI' BOOKS 74.60 AP - 00296937 5/13!2010 BRODART BOOKS 3035 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 29~y> .4P - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 1 R.07 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BROUART BOOKS 3 L64 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 E3RODAiZT BOOKS 16.97 AP-00296937 5/l3/20(0 BRODART60UKS C3Al User: VLOPE7, Vcrun icn Lopez Payee: 18 Cun•en[ Date: (15/26261 Repo: i:CK_AGBNDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - Cl>: Agenda Checlc Register Pomaii Layout 'l'ime: 15:35:2 (I'C'Y OF ILaNCHO CL7CAMONGA P-41 Agenda Check Register 5/12/2010 through >/25,20]0 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00296937 5/132010 BRUDART BOOKS 68.92 AP-(}0296937 1/13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 45.87 AP-00296937 5/132010 BRODARTBOOKS lOL6i AP - 0029!.937 //132010 BRUDART BOUKS 53.74 AP-00296937 5/I3!ZUlO BRODAR'fBOOKS 18.37 AP-00296937 5/!3/20)0 BRODARTBOOKS 25.95 AP - 00296937 5/13(2010 BRODAR7' BOOKS 5.83 AP -(1024(,937 5/l3/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 9.60 AP - 00296937 1/ 13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 14.59 AP-00296937 Sii3/2010 BROD.4RTBUOKS `479' AP-00296937 5/13;20!0 BRODARTBOOI<g 55.96 AP - 00296937 5/132010 BRODART BOOKS 23.92 AP-0024ti937 5/132010 BRODAR'fBOOKS l4.la .4P - 0029(1937 Si 1312010 BROD:4RT BOOKS 9452 AP -UU296937 5/13/Z010 BRUDART BOOKS 14.69 AF - 00296937 5;13!2010 BRUDART BOOKS 24.93 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'CBOO[{S 15.27 AP - 00296937 1/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 17.~U AP - OC<96937 5/13201(1 [3RODART BOOKS 15.26 AF - (10296937 5!13%2010 BRUDART BOOKS 26.53 AF - 00246937 5/l3/2010 BRODART BOOKS 2-'.40 .4P -00296437 5/13/2010 BROD.4RT BOOKS 27.23 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 19.53 AP - 00296437 5/13!2010 BRODART BOOKS 127.(17 AP - 00296937 5/13!2010 BRUDART BOOKS 97.15 AP - 0029(1937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 34.67 AF - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 65.40 AF-00296937 5;13/2010 BROD.4RTDOOKS 14.10 AP - 00'296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'i' BOOKS 71.55 AP - 00296939 Si 1.3/2010 BRUDART BOOi<S 29.32 :4P - 00296937 x/1312010 BRUDART BOUKS 95.50 AP-0029C>437 1i 13/2010 BRUD.4k.T'[300KS 55.32 AP-00296937 1/13/2010 BRODARTBOCp{S 48.71 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART'B<JUKS 7FAU AP-00296937 5/13/20(0 BR.ODARTBOOKS 99.94 AP-00296937 5/{3/2010 BRODARTBOOKS IZ.I6 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'fBOOKS 169.43 AP-00296937 51!3/2010 BRODART[300KS 14.69 AF-00296937 5/13%2010 BRODARTBOOKS 21.71 AP -UU296937 1/13/ZUI O LiRODART BOOKS 59.89 AP-00296937 51132010 BRODARTBOOKS 16.63 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'C BUOKS 49.96 AP - 00296937 1/1312010 BROD.4RT BOOKS 225.58 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS >46.80 AP - 00296937 Si 13/201 O BRUDART BOUKS 39.15 AP-00296937 Sii3/2010 BRODARTBOUKS 446.52 AP - 0029(1937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 19.53 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BROUAKT BOOKS 13.56 AP - 00296937 5%13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 8.95 AP - 00296937 5/1;,'2010 BRODART BOOKS 16.63 AP - 00296937 1/132010 BRODART BUOKS 212.42 AP - 00296937 5/13,2010 BRUDART BOOKS 53.58 .4P - 00296437 1/132010 BRUDART BOOKS 9.04 AP-00296937 :/l3/2010 BRODAR'CBOOKS ____ !14_09 -__ User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: l9 Current Date: 0526/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_R CG_PORTRA[ T_RC - CI<:.4senda Checl: Resister Porp ait L,a~-out Time: 15:35:? Ci'CY OE' RANCHO CUCAIViONGA P-42 Agenda Check Register 5/12/20[0 through 5/25/2010 Check Na. Check Date Vendor Name Amount rlP - 00296937 5!!3(2010 BRODART BOOKS 271.55 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 Bl20DART BOOKS 19.38 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 6.41 AP - 00246937 5;13/2010 BRODAKT BOOKS 5 L8S AP - 00296937 5/1312(110 BRODARI' BOOKS 26.83 AP • 00296937 !13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 27.84 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 29.32 AP-00296937 5113!20)0 BRODARTBOOKS 30.65 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 14R.19 .4P - 00296437 5/13/2010 BRODA27-BOOKS 96.10 AP-00296937 5/13/20 L0 BRODAR"I'BOOKS 32.07 AP - 00296937 5;13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 9.04 AP - Q0296937 5i !3/2010 BRODART BOOKS 6.81 .-~iP - 00246937 5/13/2010 BROUART BOOKS 23•x6 AP - 00296937 -5,'13/2(710 BRODART BOOKS 3! 5.03 .4P - 00296937 5/13/2010 BKODAR'f BOOKS 282.9b AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BE20DART BOOKS 288.25 AP - (10296937 5!1312010 BRODART BOOKS 520.48 AP - 00296937 Si 13/2010 BRODART BOOT{S 20.52 \P - (10296937 5/13/2010 BR.ODART BOOKS 17.58 AP - 00296937 5.l"+/2010 BRODAR'C BOOKS 135.40 AF-00396937 5/'L3/2U1.0 BRODARTBOOK$ 13.54 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 P3ROUART'6001{S 8L24 AP-(10396937 5/13/2(110 BRODARTBOOKS 81.24 AP-00296937 5/13!2010 BKOUAR'CBOOKg 8L24 AP - 0029(>937 Si 1.312010 BROD,ART BOOKS li.54 AP - 00296937 5/1312010 BRODART BOOK6 13.54 AP - 00296937 5/13P2010 BRODART BOOKS 63.19 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BROUAK'C BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BRODA.R'C BOOKS 9.02 AP-00296937 5/(3/2010 BROU.4R'fBOOKS 13.38 AP-00296937 5/13/20[0 BROD.4R'CBOOKS 9.02 AP • 00296937 5/13%2010 BRODART BOOI{5 13.53 AP - 00296937 5./13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 53.97 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BKOUAR'f BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BRODrIKT BOOKS 6.69 AP • 00296937 5!!3/2010 B120DART BOOKS 49.46 AP -00296937 5lL3/2010 BRODART BOOKS 1.8.04 AP - 0029b937 $/13/2010 BRODAKT' BOOKS 13.53 AP - 00'_96937 5/ l .i/2010 BRODA RT BOOKS 9.02 .4P - 00296937 5/13/2010 BROD.4RT BOOKS 1338 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 20:22 AP - 00296937 5;13!"!010 BR.ODART BOOKS 11.20 AP - 00296937 5;13/2010 BRODART BOOT{S 4.S 1 AP - 00296437 5/13/2010 ARODART BOOKS 9.02 AP - 00296937 5/13.x1010 RRODART BOt}i{S 4.51 .4P - 00296937 S/i 3/2010 BRODART BOOKS -2,02656 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 1,0132R AP - 00296937 -5/I 3!2010 BRODART BOOKS 1,013.28 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BROUAR'C BOOKS -688.04 AP - 00296937 Si 13!2010 BRODART BOOKS 344.02 AP • 00296937 5/13'2010 BROUART BOOKS 4.51 AP - 00296437 5/13!2010 BROUAR'C BOOKS t 120 AP-00296937 5/13/2010 BKODARTBOO!{5 A.SI User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Date: 05/26/201 Report:CK_AGh-NDA_ kEC,_PORTRAI" 1'_RC: - C'K: Agenda Check Register Portrait'Layout Tunc: 15:35:2 CITY OF R4NCH0 CLiCAMONGA P-43 ARencla Cbeck Register 9/13/2010 through 5/212010 Check No. Cbeck Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00296937 5!13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 237.38 AP - 00296937 1/13/20 [0 BRODART BOOKS G.G9 AP-00296937 9~'132U10 BRODARTBUOKS 4.~1 AP - 00296937 5!l 32010 BRUDART BOOKS 13 ~3 .4P -00296937 5/13,'2010 BRUDART BOOKS 9.02 AP -00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 9-02 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR~T BOOKS 344.02 AP - 00296937 1/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS x•74 AP-00296937 S/13/2010 BRODARTBOOKS 123.35 AP - 00290,937 9i 131'_0 t0 BRUDART BOOKS 89.9E AP - 00296937 5/13!2010 BRUDART BOOKS 420.52 AP - 00296937 1;132010 BRUDART BOOKS 39.10 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 12.97 ,4P - 00296937 91'13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 14.69 AP - 002911937 1/1.3/2010 BRODAR'F BOOKS 19.79 .4P -0(1296937 5/!3/2010 BROL>ART BOOKS 11(1.25 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODAR'C BOOKS 2721 AP - 00296937 5/13/201(3 BRUDART BOOKS 35.22 AP-002<JG937 S/13/2010 BRUDART1tO0IC5 1536 AP - 00296937 5/1.32010 BRUDART BOOKS 14.69 AP • 00296937 1/!3/2010 BRODAR"C BOOKS 34.25 AP - 0(1296937 5/13!2010 BRUDART BOOKS 771.62 AP - 0(1296937 1;13;2010 I3RODAR'C BOOKS 29.95 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 40.26 .AP - 00296937 1/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 38.50 AP - 00296937 5/13/2010 BRODART BOOKS 3224 AP - 00296937 1/13/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 6.19 AP - 00296937 5;132010 BRODART BOOKS 27.71 AP - 00296937 1/!3/2010 BRUDART BOOKS 16.37 AP - 00296937 S/L3/20(0 BRODAAT BC)OKS 1131 AP - 00296937 //132010 BRUDART BOOKS `~~0' AP - 00396937 5/i 3/2010 BROllART BOOKS 48.72 .AP - 00296937 1(!3/2010 BROD.ART BOOKS 328.40 AP -00296938 5/13/20!0 CLEAN S'CREE'1' [NC. 3.520.00 AP - 00296939 5/13/2010 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO INC 86.94 AP-00296940 1/!3/2010 HOLLIDAYROCKCOINC 50.00 AF - 00296940 1/!3/2010 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC S 12.88 AP - 00296942 5/13/2010 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC 856.50 AP-00296943 5(13!2010 'CRUGILEENLANDCARB 4,550.00 AP-00296943 1/13/2010 "CKUGREENLANI~ARE 1,120.06 AP-00296943 5/132010 TRIJGREENLANDCARE 420.E)0 AP - 0(1296944 1/13/201(1 N'SA I.JS Gt.JARDS CO [NC 281.75 AP - 00296946 5!192(110 A & I ItJcPROGRAPEI[CS 12(1.82 AP - 00296947 1/!9/2010 A&V SOFTBALL 2,944.00 AF'-(10296948 5/192(110 ABL.ETRONICS 118.39 AP-00296949 1/I9/2Uf0 ABMJANCCOR[ALStd% 1,816.?7 AP - 00296949 5/19!?01.0 ABM JANITORIAL SW 2,131.72 AP-00296949 1/1!/2010 ABMJANITOREALSW 43,051.11 AP - 00296949 5/19/2010 ABM JANITORIAL SLV 4,616.81 AP - 00296949 1/19/2010 ABM JANITORIAL Std' 3,1O8J2 AP - 00296952 5/192010 AEP SYSTEMS CONSULTING 1NC 1,929.00 AP - 002969>2 1/19/2010 AEF SYS"CEL•SS CONSULTING [NC 5,86'•10 AP _{!0"'96953 5/19/2010 AFLAC 6,330.48 AP-00296914 1119/2010 AGUILERA,ISAIAH 16238 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Pane: 21 Current Date: 0526`201 Report:CK_AGENDA _REG_PORTRA[ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:35:2 CI'CY OF itANCAO CUCAiVtONGA P-44 Ai;eoda Check Re>rester 5/(2i20fU through $/25/2010 Check No. Check Dafe Vendor Name Amowtt AP -0(1296954 5/19/3410 AGUILERA, [SAIALI 7L62 AP - 00296955 5/! 9!2010 ALPH.4GRAPFIICS 345.00 AP - 40296955 5/19/2010 ALP[lAGRAPHICS 32.95 AP - 0029ti956 5/19/2010 AMERICAN ML"D[CAL RESPONSE [6 L 197.49 AP - 04296957 Si 19/20 (0 ARNOLD FIELDS F'AINT[NC; 525.40 AP - 00296997 5!19!2010 ARN'OLD FIELDS PAINTING 1,070.00 AP - 00296957 1'19/2010 ARNOLD FIELDS PAINTING 100 GO AP-00296959 5/19!2010 .4RROWWOODSWORKSINC. 1,600.00 AP - 00296964 5/l9/2U 10 ASSI SEC(RITY I OS.00 AP - 4U29C++960 1/19;2010 ASSI SECURITY 3,075.00 AP - 00296960 5!19'2010 ASST SECURITY 2,530.00 .4P - 00296960 1/19/2010 ASSI SECURITY I2~.00 AP - 00296960 5/19(2010 ASSI SECURITY 220.00 AP - 00296960 5!19/2010 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00296960 5i 19/2010 ASSI SECF.IR[TY 105.00 .4P - 002969(10 5/19/2010 ASSI SECURITY 1,537.0 AP - 00296960 5/19/2010 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP - 00296960 5/19/2010 ASSI SECURITY 10.00 AP - 0029696 ( 5/19/2010 BALDEON', CARLOS 1-`•0.00 AP - 00?96962 5/(9/2010 BEACON PLUMA[NG 160.00 AP-00296963 5/19/2010 BESTDELfVERYLLC 6L60 .4P-00296964 1.!19/2010 BISHOP COMPANY 40;.79 AP -00296965 5r'l9/2410 BROWN, F.D11!CNA 13.00 AP - 0029696b 5/ 19/2010 BUILD [T GREEN 400.00 AP - 00296967 5/l9/2010 CADY, COREY 300.00 AP-0029(1968 51[9.!2010 CL4LIFORN[AELECTRONICENTRy 252.00 AP -00296969 5/19/2410 CAL[FO2N[A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING IN 16,152.59 AP - 00296970 5'19/2010 CALIFORNIA, S"FA'LE OF 25.00 AP - 00296971 1i !9/2010 CALIFORNIA, STr\TE OF 27 ?3 AP - 00296972 5!19/2010 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 50.00 AP - 00296973 5/19/2010 CALIFORNIA, S'1"A'FI OF 331.83 AP-00296974 5/19/2010 C'r1LIF'ORNIA,STATEOF ISO.UO AP - 00296975 1/19Y2010 C'ALIFORN'IA, STAT'E' OF' 135.00 AP - (10296977 5!! 9/'2010 CARRI:iRA INDCJS't'RIAL <`:ONTRACTORS 5.000.00 AP - 00296978 5/19/2010 CAS'CRO, ROB[:R'P 4,000.00 AP-00296979 5/19!20(0 CFIILDSI,JPPORTL"NFORCED4ENT'I7[ViSION 171.00 .4P-(}0296980 5/19/2010 CITY RENTALS 24,39 AP - 002969R1 5%!9!2010 C[.,ABBY, SANDRA 1,00U.00 AP - 0(1296982 1/19/2010 CONCEPT POGVDF2 COA-LING 120.00 AP -00296982 Si19/2010 CONCEI?"I' POWDER COATING 360.00 .4P -00296983 5/19/2010 CONTINEN'FAL.4MER.FCAN INSURANCE. COMPe (11.97 AP - 00296984 5/19/2010 CGNTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 16.39 AP - 00296986 5! 1912010 COSCU FIRE PROTECTION L,ORO.GO AP - 00296987 1/!9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DiSTR1CT 205.47 AP-00296987 5/19,'2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 262.46 AP - 00296937 1;19!2010 CUCAMONG.4 VAI:,LEY 1VATER DISTRICT 157.19 .4P-00296987 5/19!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,08 LOS AP - 40296937 5/!9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY 1VATER DISTRICT' 310.86 AP - 00296987 5/19!2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 212.61 AP-00296937 5/!9/201(1 CUC.4MONGA VALLEY WATER DIS'FRiCT 178.46 AP - 00296987 5/1.9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY VdATE2 DISTRICT 1.588.63 AP - 00296937 5/19/2010 L"UCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3 98.12 AP-00396987 5!!9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATERD(STRICT (98.12 AP -00296987 5/19/2010 CUCAMONGr1 VALLEY W,4TER DISTRICT 39631 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Corrend Date: 05!26!201 Report: Cii_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_RC - CK: Agenda Checl: Regisier Portrait Layoui Time: 11:352 CITE' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-45 Agenda Check Register 5 /1 2120 1 0 through 525/2(110 Check No. Check Date VenAor Name Amount AP - 00296487 5!19/201 U CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.42 AP-00296987 5;19/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.94 AP - 00296987 5/192010 CUCAR40NGA VALLEY WATER DISTRTCT 4?4.86 AP - 00296987 5/19!2010 CUC.4MONGA VALLEY R'A'fER DISTRICT 542.09 AP-00296987 5{19{2010 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDIS'fR.ICT $8.35 AP - 00296987 5/19/2010 CUC.4MONGA VALLEY 1VATER DIS"CRIC7- 686.79 AP - 00296987 5i 19/2010 CCICAR?ONGA VALLEY 14'ATER. DISTRICT 110.92 AP-00296937 5/19{201(1 CCJC,4R?ONGA VALLEY WATER DIS'I'RICf ~ 68.75 AP-00296987 5/1.9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 69.94 AP-00296987 5{192010 CUC.4MONGAVALLEYW'ATERDISTRIC'f I,(72.O1 AP - 0029ti987 5{192010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER. DIS"fR1CT 693.58 AP - 00296987 5%19/2010 CUC;AMONGA VALLEY WATER DTSTR[CT 693.58 AP-00296987 51192010 CUCAIvtON'GA VALLEY 1VATER.DIS'CR,ICT 2,158.83 AP-00296987 5/1912(.110 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WA'CER DIS'CRI'CT 1,810-SU AP-00296987 5/{.9/'20(0 CCICAMONGA VALLEY WA"fER DISTRICT 1,407.48 AP-00296987 5lt9/2010 CCICAMONGA VALLEY WA'I-L-RDIS'CRIC,"C 95.33 AP - 00296987 5/I4/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRK:"f 194.09 AF'-(10296987 Si192G10 CUCAbfUNGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 309.44 AP - 0029C•987 5/(9/2010 CUCAMONGA VALLEI"WATER DISTRICT 275.69 .4P - 00296987 5!19/2010 CUC:IMONGA VALLEY WA'CER DIS'CRLCT 25>~3 i AP - 00296937 5/192010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.88 AP - 00296987 5/192010 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 298.62 AP - 00296990 5/l9%2010 DEL R?ECHAN[CAL. 469.92 AP - 00296991 5/19/2010 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS (A( 105.00 AP - 00296992 5/19;2010 DUMBELL M.4N FITNESS ECIU[PR•fENT. THE 145.00 AP - 00296993 5!19/2010 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 295 20 AP-00296994 5/19/2610 ECS[MAGINGINC 2:835.42 AP-00296995 ${'(92010 EDPCtND 146.18 AP - 00296996 5/19/2010 EL,LIS ENTERPRISES 2,500.00 r1P - 00296996 5/19/2010 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 70.00 AP - 00296997 5/19/3010 EMPIRE FLOOR t:OVERING 445.62 AP-00296998 5/1920{0 ER?PLOYMBNTDEVELOPMEN"L'DEPT. 409.02 AP-00296999 5!!9.'201({ EV/iNGtRRIGATIONPRODUC"CS (i00A0 r1P-00296999 5/19/2(1!0 E,W(NGIRRIGAT'lONP1ZODU(°fS 334.71 AP - 00297000 5/19/3010 FASTENAL COIvtPANy i 56.40 AP - 00297001 5/(9/2010 FEDF..RAT.. EXPRESS CORP 93.38 .4P - 0029700 I 5/19/2010 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORp 16. (6 AP - 0029 {001 5; I WZO10 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.51 .4P-00297002 j/1900(0 FERGUSONENTERPRISESINC 223.81 AP - 00297003 5/19/2010 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 405.00 AP - 00297005 5{192010 FORD PRlNT1NG AND R•f.4ILING INC 1,543.19 AP - 00297007 5/19/2010 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 44 ~6 AP - 00297009 5/19/2010 GEO PLASTICS TNC 4,515.64 AP - 0029701 I 5/192010 GONZALEZ, PAUL 66.00 AP - (10297012 5/19{2010 GRANT III, VINCENT 520.00 AP - 00297013 5/19201 U GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 156.50 .4P - 00297013 Sr 19/2010 GR4PH[CS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 266.97 AP-00297014 5/19/20 t0 HAR-BROINC. 19,74LG0 AP - 00297015 5! 1912010 EFARTON, RY"AN 75.00 AP - 00297017 5/19/201(1 !-/ILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 499.83 AP - 00297017 5/192010 ERLLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 8.62 AP - 00297017 5/!9/20(0 [-TILLS PET NUTRITION SALES CNC 2536 AP - 0029701 R 5;19/2010 HOR?E DEPOT CREDfL' SERVICES 43.37 AP-00297018 5/19{2010 tiOMEDEPOTCREDI'fSERVICES 14736 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Pave: 23 CurteatL)ate: 0:+/2(i/20f Report:CK_AGENDA_ E2EG_POR'CRAI 1',RC - CK::~genda Check Register Portrait i-,ayrnit Time: 15:35 CIT4' OF R41vCH0 C[JCAMONGA P-46 Agenda Chcctz Reeister 5; l3/2010 Through 5/Z52010 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP - 00297019 5x'19/2010 HOUSE OF RUTH 99820 AP-0029702? >/(9!2010 [NiPERtALSPRINKLERSUPPLYINC 93.94 AP - 00297023 5;1.9/2010 [D4PERL4L SPRINKLER SUPPLY [NC 989.14 AP - 00297024 5/19/2010 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 119.19 AP - 00'_'97025 5/19;2010 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDL4TION BOAT 83240 AP - 00297025 5/l9/2010 INLAND FA1R HOUSING AND MEUTATIUN B0.41 96^_.69 AP - (10297026 51' 1912010 INLAND PRESORT & N1.41LING SERV 1CES 70.10 .4P-0029?028 5;19/2010 1MSE'RVICES 2,940.00 AP-00297029 Si[9/2UL0 .IOBSAVAILABLE7NC 504.00 AP - 00297030 5i 191200) JOHNSON, t.INDA 0 100.00 AP - 00297(132 5/19/2010 L,A STAGE ALLIANCE 300.00 AP - 00297034 5/ 19/2(110 MANEL A, ROSIE 27.47 AP - ('10297034 5i 19/2010 MA'NELA; ROSIL""- 7.16 AP - 00297035 5/19/2010 NtARIPOSA HORTICLiCCURAL ENT INC 1,581.61 AP-OU^97036 ~/l9/2010 MARSHALL,VIRGlN1A 30.00 AP - 00297038 5~`t9201U MCMASTER CARR SItPPLY COMPANY 22.19 AP-00297038 5/19/2010 NtCMASTERCARRSUPPLYCOMPANy 27.48 .M - (10297035 Si 19?20I0 MCM.ASTGR CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 12.97 AP-00297039 5/192010 MIDDLE RIDGE INC 2,093.75 AP-00297040 >/L920L0 MIDWEST"TAPE 495.30 AF - 00297040 5/ I9/20!0 MID~TJEST TAPE 511.27 AP - 00297040 5/19/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 3 L I7 AP - 00297040 5;19/2010 MIDV~/EST TAPE 47.95 AP - 00297040 5/19/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 49.98 AP - 00297040 5/!9;'2010 MIDWEST TAPE 49.98 AP-00397040 5/1.9/2010 MIDWEST TAPE 152.94 . AP-00297046 5/19/2010 MIDWES"E'TAP6 (52.94 AP - 0029704 I 5/l~'2010 MIJAC ALARh4 COMPANY 150.00 AP - 00247043 5/L9r'2010 MOUNTAIN VIEVr' EM PHYS MEDICAL. GROUP I 637.00 AP-00297044 5/192010 MSA(NLANDEMPTREJDP_SERTCHAPTER 105.00 AP - 00297045 5/19/2010 MUCURIr1; SARA 108'0 AP - 00297046 5/19/2010 MUSIL, JOE ?5.00 AP-00297047 5/!9/2010 OCLC[NC 4(1.39 AP-(10297049 5/19/2010 OFF(CEDEPOT 1,!15.95 AP - 00297049 5/19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 38.69 AP - 00297049 5/19/2010 OPFTCE DEPOT I56A 1 ,4P-00297049 5/1920!0 OFFICE DEPOT 1,353.56 AP - 00297049 5/19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 190.95 AP - 00297049 51'1912010 OFFICE DEPOT y221 AP - 00297049 5/!9/2014 OFFICE DEPOT 74.82 AP-00297049 ~~192010 OFFICE DEPOT 37.11 AP - 00297049 5/192010 OFFICE DEPO"f 168.86 .4P - 00297049 5/19%2010 OFFICE. DEPOT 6.22 AP - 00297049 5/19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 277.19 AP - 00297049 5/192010 OFFICE DEPOT 9932 AP - 00297049 5/!9/2010 OFFICE. DEPOT 9.04 AP - 00297049 5/192010 OFFICE DEPOT 192.72 AP - 00297049 5/19.x2010 OFFICE DEPOT- 93.84 AP - 00297049 5/ 19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 81.00 AP - 00297049 5/ 19/2010 OFFICE DEFO'C t 79.99 AP-00297049 5/192610 OFFICEDL--POT 24.40 AP-00297049 5/(9/20(0 OFFICEUEPOT 268.69 AP-00297049 Sil9/20(0 OFFICEDEPUT 5>.27 AP-00297049 5/!9/2010 OFFICEDEI~OT S I-638 Elser: VLOPF.,Z -Veroni ca Lopez Page: 24 Current Dame: OS/26l~ (1! Report:CK_AGENDA_RF.Ci_PORTF2Ai T_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register PortraitC.z1'out Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-47 Aeenda Check Register 5i 12/2014 throueTr 11'2512014 Check No. Check Date VenAor Name Amount AP - 00297049 5!192(110 OFFICE DEPOT 73.28 AP - 00297049 5/19/201(1 OFFICE DEPOT 47 Lfi6 A.P-00297049 5/L9!20T0 OFFICE DEPOT 53.32 AP - 00297049 >/i9/201.0 OFFICE DEPOT 240.12 AP-00297049 ;;'(9;2010 OF'FIC'.EDEPO-C 57.61 AF - 00297049 5!1912010 OFFICE DEPOT I L36 AP-00297049 Si L9/20(0 OFFICE DEPOT 13.16 AP - 00297049 5/!9/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 73.54 AP - 00297049 5'19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 25.09 AP - 00297049 5!19/2010 OFFICE DEPOT 384.~d AP - 00297049 1/19!20 i0 OFFICE UEPO-C 39.89 AP - 00297049 5,'19.-'2010 OFFICE DEPOT 20.42 AP - 00297049 5!19/2010 OFFFCE DEPOT 19.02 .4P-00297049 ~/19P_Ut0 OF'FFCL'DEPOT (27.15 AP-00297050 5!L9/2Uf0 ONTARFOWINNELSONCO 51,5$ AP-(10297051 5!19i20F0 ON'FRAC .14.06 AF-00).970$4 1!!9/2.010 O'T'SUILA,DENN[S 150.00 AF - (10297055 5%1.9!2(110 PAL CAMPAIGN 32.0(! AP-00297056 5/19/7010 PARS 3,500.00 AF - 00297057 5!19/2(110 PRE-PAID LEGAL SL=RVICES INC 198.09 AP - 00297058 5/19/2010 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES MC t L40 AP-00297059 5!19i20t0 PR.OPETD[STRIBUTORSiNC 2,055.95 AP - 00297062 5/!9,'2010 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICES [NC 160.00 AP-00297062 5!19!2010 RANCHO DISPOSALSERV[CESINC 164.0.0 AP - 00297063 5119!2010 RANDOM HOUSE INC d4Al AF - 00297064 51'1912010 RCPFp 3,859.42 AP - 002970fi5 5/19.i20M1 RED WING SF10E STORE 184.86 AP - 00297065 5!L9;2410 RED W[NG SHOE STORE 220.47 AP - 002970ti6 5/!9/2010 RED WING SHC)E STORE 225.10 AP - 00297071 5119!20 (0 RU'FLEDC;,F;, AMY 75.00 AP-00297072 5!19/2010 SAFE;KIUSWORLDWIDE SU.00 AP - 00297073 5 L4,'2010 SALUANA, F;RIS"[-E M 2,300.00 AP - 00297074 5(!9/2010 SAN BERN.4RDIN0 COCMTY SFIER[FFS DEPT Sd5.13 AP - (10297075 511.)%2010 SAN BERNA[tD1N0 CTY FLOOD CON'iROL. D[ST 120.00 AF' - 00297076 5%!9/3010 SANTEL.LAN, MARIE 100.00 AP - 00297077 5 L9!2010 SBPFA 147.63 AP - 00297079 5/19:'201 U SHERIFFS C'.OCJRT SERVlCF.S f 10.00 AP-00297080 ~'19!20E0 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 109.61 AP-00297081 5!19/30[0 SHERIFFSCOUR'CSF.RVIC'ES 150.00 AP-00297082 1/E9!ZOlO SFIOETERIA ~ 100.04 AP-(!0297086 jil9l20I0 SOCJ'FHERNCALIFORNIAF:DISOIV 2L65 AP-00297036 1'19/2010 SOU1'1iERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 20.38 .4P - (10297086 Si'1 J'20t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2437 AP - 001.97036 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2 L60 AP - (!0297086 5/F9/2010 SOU'T'HERN CAI-,IFORNIA ED[SON 30.63 AP - 00297086 5/[9!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.05 AP - 00297086 1119!2010 SOUTf-TERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2L90 AP - 00297036 5/19r2010 SOCrTHL"RN CAL[FORMA EDISON 22.04 AP - 00297086 1. L9!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 2t.1 i AP-00297086 5/(9/2010 SOLrTFtERNCALIFORN[AEDISON 59.65 AP - 00397086 S,rl9/2010 SOUTHERN CALTFOKNIA EDISON 30.86 AP - 00297036 5!(9/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.04 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFOItNlA EDISON ~ 21.1 I AP-00297036 5%!9/2010 SOIJTHERNCAL[FORN[AEDIgON 2L84 User: V[,OPEL-Veronica L,apez ,Page: 25 Current Date: US/26101 Report:C'K_AGL'NDA_ REG_PORTRA[ T_RC - <;K.: Agenda Check Resister Porn~ait Layout Time: 15:31:2 CITY OF RA~YCHO CUCAMUNC=A P-48 Agenda Check Resister Si (2/2010 through 5/25/201 O Check No. Check llafe Vendor Name Amount AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 51.61 AP - 00297036 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.90 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.07 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.63 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 20.92 AP - 0029705!1 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 68.41 AP - 00297036 ~'l9/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57 AP - 00297086 5!L92010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNLA LDISON 67.17 AP - 0029?086 S/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 35.17 AP-00297086 5/(9r'2010 SOUL"HERNCALIFORNIAED[SON 2L11 AP - 00297086 5/[9/2010 SOUTHERN C.4L[FORNCA ED[SON 21 • I1 AP - 00297086 5/192010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNLI EDISON 68.80 AP - 00297086 5/192010 SOUTHERN CAL:IFORNL4 GDISON 9633 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 163.76 .4P - (10297086 5;1912010 SOUTE-IERN CALIFORNIA E,D[SON 31.71 AP -00297086 5/ly/2010 SOLrTFIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2Lll ,AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOCTHERN CAL.IFORN[A EDISON 21.1 l AP. 002970SG 5/192010 SOUTI{ERN CALIPOP.P-tL4 GDF$OA' 92.64 AP-00297086 5/(9!2010 SOCJTFIERNCALIFC)RNIAEDISON 20.38 AP - 00297036 5/19/2010 SOCTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2126 .4P - 0029708(, 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN C:ALIFORNLA ED[SON 61.36 AP-0029703(r 5/19/2010 SOU'FIIERNCAL[FORNIAEDISON 82.69 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOCITFIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON l>O.R2 AP - 00297056 5!(9!2010 SOLITI-TERN C.AL[FORNIA EDISON 7G.7R AP - 0039708(, 5/19/20 f 0 SOUTEERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.50 AP - 0(1297086 5/19/20!0 SUUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI5UN 33.16 .4P - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 937.69 AP - 00297056 Sr19/2010 SOCTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 84.19 AP - 00297086 5/19!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BD[5ON 22.53 AP -00297036 5/[9/2010 SOU"['EiERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21:26 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 1,454.32 AP - 00297056 5/l9/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.01 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOU"I'HL-RN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 52.17 AP • 00297086 5/19/2010 SOU'{'HGRN CALIFORNIA BDiSON 58.08 AP-0029708b 5/19('20!0 SOUT'HERNCAL,[F'ORMAEDISON 48.49 .4P - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOU'I'HF,RN C.4LIFORN[A ED[SON 21.11 AP - 00297086 5/192010 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON S I . l4 .4P - 00297086 5/19;2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON I t5.75 AP - 00297086 .5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 471.55 .4P - 00297056 S/19!2010 SOCJTFTERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9 L63 AP - 00297086 5/192010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.57 r\P - 00297086 5/19!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP - 00297036 S/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.38 AF-00297086 5!(92010 SOUTffERNC.4LIFORNLAED[SON 86.20 AP -00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTFERN CALIFORNIA EDlSUN 192? 1 AP -00297086 5/19'2010 SOU'tEIERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 712.05 AP - 00297086 5!19/2010 SOLr'FHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON (14.94 AP - 00297086 5!19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2521 AP-00297056 5/19/2010 SOUTI[ERNCALIFORNL4EDISON 27.33 AP - 00297086 5;19/2(110 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 181.73 AP - 00297056 S/19.12010 SUL[T[-!ERN CALIFORNIA ED[SUN •41.54 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SO[J'FFIERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 25.13 AP -00297086 5/192010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 24.55 [Jser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez I?a~e: 26 Current Dnte: 05/26/„(tl Repo~4:CK_A<iENDA_ RBO_PORTRA[ T_RC- Cd~._ Agenda Check Register Pn~trait I-,ayout Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAibI[OlIrGA pig Agenda Chccl: Resister _5,i1'J2010 through 5%25/2010 Check No. Check Qate Vendor Name Amount AP - 00297086 5!19,`2010 SOUTHERN CALIFURNIA ED[SON 22.7 AP - 00297086 8!19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2 L L 1 AP -00297086 5%19r201U SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 17.26 AP -0029708C> 5i19i20FU SOU"LHERN CALIFORNIA GDFSON 53.77 AP - UO^_97086 5%19i'2t1 i 0 SOU"I'HERN CALIFORNIA F_D[SON 1236 AP-00297086 8!19.!2010 SOUCHERNCALCFORN[AED[SON 21.11 AP-00297086 5;19/2(110 SOUTFIERNC:AL.IFORNIAED[SON IU7.99 AP - 00297086 5/19/201.0 SOUTHERN CAL,II'ORNIA EDiSON 38.88 AP-0(1297086 S/19/2ULO SOU'1'HEk:NCAL,TFORN7AEDIS(}N 49.08 .4P-00297086 S/!9;2010 SOU'rHER.NCA1..fF7>KNIAEDISON 64,43 AP - 00297086 Si 19/2010 SOCJ'CHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.05 .AF - 00297086 5/19/201D SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.R0 AP - U029708ti 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 43.28 .4P-0029;086 8!t9i2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON 348.=44 AP - 00'97086 5119!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 609.80 AP-00297086 Sii9%2010 SOUTFiERNCALIPORNL4ED[SON 59836 AP-00297086 5'19r2U1U SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 24.13 AP-00297086 Si19/2010 SOCJTEiERNCALIFORNIAED(SON 22.46 AP - 0029?086 8!19/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ''-"8 AP - 00297086 ;iit9/2010 SOUTHERN CALdFURN1A ED[SON '<5.42 AP - OU29?086 5/!9/2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNAI EDISON 40.47 AF - 00297086 5%19;2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84 AP-0029708fi S/19/20((1 SULiTHE12NCALtFORNIAL-"DISON 26.63 AP - 00297086 5!19/2010 SOU2'I[EICN CAL1FOItNFA EDISON 35.50 AP - U0297U8ti 5!19.iZU l0 SOUTHERN CALFFORN[A EDiSON 31 ~78 AP-UU29708(i Si19i2010 SOUTHERNCALIFI)RNEAEDtSON 21.90 AP - 00297086 5/I9,"LOlO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 7b.59 AP - 00297086 5/19,'2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 EDISON 11036 .4P-00297086 5/19!2010 SOU'PHE'RNC.4LiFORNFAEDISON 932.47 AP - 00297086 5fL9/2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON i 58.8 t AP -00297086 SiI9/2010 SOUTHERN CALCFORNIA EDISON 21.&0 AP - 00297086 5;19!2010 SOU1"IIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.05 AP-00297086 >i49~~OtU SOUTHERNCALIFURNL4ED[SON 54.63 AP-00297086 SrI9/2010 SOUTHERNCAL[FORNIAED[SON 23x0 AP-00297036 8%l9.%2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 58.64 AP - 00297086 5/19/2040 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.69 AP-00297086 Si19/2Ui0 SOU'CHERNCAL.[FORNIAEpISON 55.4` AP-00297086 5!19120(0 SOUTHERNCAL.IFORNIAEDISON 21.80 .4P-00297036 5/19!2010 SOCPF'HERNCAL,IFORNIAEDISON 48.47 AP-0(1297086 5!19/^ZUlO SOU'CI-tERN(.;AL[FORNIAEDtS{)N 10.03 .4I'-00297086 5't9/20I0 SOIITHERNCALIFORNfAEDISOIV 49.6b AP - 00297086 8/19/2010 SOLTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11 .4P - 00297086 5;19i20t0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 21.65 AP - 00297086 S/I9/20tU SOUTHERN C.4L[FORN[A EDISON 89.58 AP-00297086 5119/2010 SOUTHERNCAL,IFORN[AGDtSON Lat.?4 AP-00297086 8/t9/2010 SOUTHERNCAL[FORN[AEDISON 2L11 AP - 00297086 9/19/2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.b3 AP-00297036 5lt9/20(0 SOFJTIiERNC.ALIFORNIAEDISON 2038 AP - 00297086 Sr't9/2010 SOUTHERN CAL[FORNL4 ED[SON 21.17 AP-0029708b 5/l9i?OIU SOUTHGRNCALIPORNI,4EDISON 34.97 AP - 00297086 Sr'1912010 SOUTHERN CALTFORNIA EDISON 71.44 AP - 00297086 5/19/2010 SOUTHERN CAUFORNr[A BDISON IU4.6S AP-(10297086 81!9/20(0 SOUTFiERNCALIFORNFAGDISON 22.53 AP-00297086 8/!9,'2010 SOLCTHERNCALIFORNIAEDISON 22.38 (ISer: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 27 Current Cate: (,15/26,'301 Report:CR._AGENDA_ REG_PORTFL4I T_RC - <;IC: Agenda Checl; Kegisler Portrait Layout Time: (5:35:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA P-50 Agenda C(teck Revister 5!1?/2010 through 5/25/2010 Chick Nn. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP-00297087 5/19!2010 SOUTHERNCALIFORN[.AEDISON 68,218.41 AP-00297087 1/19/20(0 SOUTF[ERNCAL[FORNL4EDISON 9,213.'_ AP - 00297087 5/19/2010 SOUTF[L'=R.N CALIFORNIA EDfSON 5,336.50 AP - 00297087 5!19!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EllISON 12;9509.3 AP-00297087 5/19,x2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAED[SON 34,175.85 AP-00297087 5/(9/2010 SOU'FHERNC.4LiFOKN[AEDiSON !8,845.19 AP-UU2970R7 5119/2010 SOC71'HERNCALCFORN[AEDfSON f,`1.1-124 AP - 00297087 1119/2010 SOUTHERN C.4LIFORN(A ED[SON (4,43595 AP - 00"97087 5;19!2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 12R.47 AP - 00297087 5!1912010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3732 AP-00297087 5!!912010 SOUTHERNCAL[FORNIAF.D[SON 5,0?5.9f .4P - 00297087 5119%2010 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDfSON 5,41226 AP - 00297087 5i 1.912010 SOUTHERN CAL[r"ORMA EDiSON 11,302.63 AP - 00297087 5;1.9./2010 SOLJTHF.,RN CALIFORNIA F..DISON 6,129.09 AP - 00297088 5/19/2010 SOU`I"TfERN CAL,[EORNIA EQUIPMENT 2.563.00 .4P-(10297088 5/19/2010 SOUTHF.,RNCALIFOKIQIAEQIJIPMENT 1,184.96 AP-00297089 1;19/2010 SPARKLETTS (0-'•00 A['-00297090 5/19/2010 SPARKS,CAROLANN (65.00 AP-00297091 5!19!2010 STERICYCLELNC 481.8Cr AP _ 00297pg2 5;1912010 STF.IiL[NG COFFEE SERVICE 49.85 AP - 00297092 1/19/2010 STERLING COFFEE- SERVICE 106.20 AP - 0029/092 9/19"_010 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 163.76 AP - 00297092 >/l9/2010 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 39.31 AP - 00297092 5/19/2010 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 24323 AP - 00297092 5/19/2010 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE' 201,95 AP - 00297092 5/19/2010 S"CERLING COFFEE SEEtVICE 2', 3.44 AP - 00297092 5/19/20((1 S'F'ERLING COFFEE SERVICE 65.05 AP - 00297092 Si 19/2010 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 133.99 .4P-00297093 51(9/20(0 STEVENSON,CHR[S 2.00 AP - 00297094 5%1912010 STOFA, JOSEPH 12.00 AP - UO""<97U95 5/19/2010 SUNSHINE GR04tiF,RS NURSERY fNC 80.48 AP - 00297096 51(9!2010 SWORD FIGHTS RJC 500.00 AP - 00297098 1(19/2010 TERRONES, GERALD ~•~ AP-002970)9 Sil9/2010 TUTTLE,PAULA 100.00 AP - 00297101 5,x19/2010 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SF•,RViCES INC 966:' 1 AP-00297102 5/(9/2010 UNISOURCE,W'ORLDWIDEINC; 631.04 AP - 00297103 5i 19/2010 (JN[TED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 218.30 AP-0(1297104 5/19,x2010 UN1TEDw'AY 2£x1.07 AP - (10297104 Si 19/201 U UNITED W AY 11.00 AP - 00297106 1;19/20(0 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.63 AP -00297106 X11912010 VERJZON WIRELESS - LA 38.80 AP-00297(06 1/19/20(0 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 41AI .4P - 00297106 5(19!2010 VERIZON W LRELESS - L.4 36.33 AP - 00297106 5/19/2010 VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 .4P - 00297106 5;19120(0 \BRIZON WIRELESS - LA 41.32 AP - 00297106 5/19/2010 VER[ZON W'IR.ELESS - LA 45.01 .4F - 00297106 5/19!2010 VERILON \VLRELESS - LA 45.01 AP -00297106 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 0029710G 5/(9/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 45.01 AP-00297106 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 37.64 AP - 00297106 5:19/2010 VER.IZON WIRELESS - LA 30.55 AP - 00297106 1!1912010 VERIZON WIRELESS - L:4 49.21 AP - 00297106 5/19.'2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 3633 4P - 00297106 5119.'2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA '16.33 User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Current Date: 05.26/_01 Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRA[ T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Poru'ait Layoui Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF I2A.NCI30 CUCA1d~IONCrA P-51 AEenda Check ReEister 5113!20(0 [hrouah 5/25/3010 Cheek No. Chec3cDate VettdorName Amonnt AP-f)0347i0h 5/19/^2010 V%RFZ,ON WIRELESS-LA 37.12 AP-00297'!06 5/19/20(0 VERIZONWIRELESS-LA 36.33 AP-00297106 5/1.9/2010 VERF7_ONW£RELESS-LA 46.33 AP-00297106 5/19/2010 VERI7_ONWIKELESS-LA 30.53 AP - 00297106 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - f,A 37.b4 AP - 00247306 5119%2010 VERIZON W1R.EI.E SS - L9 3fi.67 AP-('10297306 51(9,'2010 VEffiZON WIRELESS-LA 45.01 AP - 00297106 5/14/2030 VEKIZ,ON WIRELESS - L,p 58.28 AP - 00297106 5%L92{110 VERILON WIRELESS - LA 208.46 AP - 00247106 j/19/^_070 VERTZON WIRELESS - I,A 48.79 AP-00297(06 5/19/2010 VERIZONWIRELESS-L,A 4132 AF - 00297'106 511920'10 VEKIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.25 AP-002971(,)6 5/192010 VERiZON WIRELESS-i.A 229.15 AP-00297(06 51(92010 VERtZON\VIRELL-',SS-LA 36.33 AP-00297(06 ~%(92010 VERIl.ON GIRELESS-LA 37.20 AP-00247(06 5/19/20 t0 VER.7ZON W[REL,ESS-LA 3633 RP-00297106 5!19/20!0 VEREZON WIRELESS-L.q 3b.33 AP - 00397'106 51192(110 VERIZON W [RECESS - LA - 3.30 e n _ 40J.97106 5i 192010 VER3ZCSN WIR.EL,B55 - LA 36.33 AP-0024710b 5/19/20£0 VER(ZON W[RELES9-LA '4.41 AP - 00297!06 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 .4P - 00397306 5/19/3010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 50.21 .AP-00297306 5/19.'20111 VER3ZON WIRELESS-LA 37.07 AP - 002971 I 1 5!'19,'2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 ,AP-002971£1 5/19J20E0 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 3832 AP - 002971 t t 5/392010 VERIZON W'[RELESS - LA 4'9.21 AP-002971'[1 5/192010 VER[ZON WIRELESS-Lr\ 33.81 AP-00297111 5/1£1','2010 VEIttZON WIRELESS-LA 55.12 AP -002971 l I 5/!9;3010 VER170N' WIRELESS - LA 91.30 AP - 00297 [ t 1 5.%192010 V ERtZON WIRFLf:,SS - LA 45.01 -1P-002971£1 5/19%?OIO VER[ZC).NW3RE'LESS-L.A 36.74 AP - 002971 i 1 .5/19/20 E 0 VER[ZON WI[ELESS - LA O.C)0 AP-00297711 5/14/2010 VFRIZONWIRFiLESS-LA 30.33 AP - 0029 711 1 5/19,'20l(J VEREZ(7rT WIRELESS - LA 45.01 AP-0029711E 5/I9/201U VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 64.02 AP - 00297 t 1 ( 5;1912030 VER17..ON WIRELESS - LA -9.64 AP - 0029713 3 5119/2010 VL-'R[ZON W'iRELESS - I,A 36.33 AP - 0029711 i 5!i 9/20 (0 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 39.14 AP-00297111 5/1912070 VEFtiZONWIRELESS-LA '3633 AP-00297111 5/192010 VEKI7.ON WIRELESS-LA 44.75 AP - 0029713 I 5; (9;2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - L,A 44.89 A.P - 0029713 L 1'19/20 [0 VERI2.ON WIRELESS - Lr1 36.33 AF - 002971 t t Si39/2010 VERIZ,ON WIRELESS - LA 44.75 AP-00297111 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 65?0 .4P-00297(!! S/(9120£0 VER.iZON WIRELESS-LA 36.33 AP-00297111 5/19/2010 VER[ZONWIREI,ESS-LA 36.33 AP - 0029713 ! 5l ! 9,`7(110 VERIZUN W [RECESS - L,A 3633 AP - 00297111 5/19201f) VERFZON WIRELESS -LA 36.33 AP - O(Y1471 I ( Si 192010 VEItIZON V.'IRELESS - LA 30.53 AP - 002971 I ! >/19/20 t G VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 .4P - 0029771 ! Si19/^_010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 30.53 AP - 002971 t t 5!1912010 VERIZON \VEREI,ESS - LA 3634 AP - 002971 L l 5;19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS -LA 36.35 AP-00297111 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 36.3 User. VLOPEZ -Veronica Lepez Page: 29 Current Dale: 05/26/201 Report:CK_AGENDA_ REG_PORTRAI T_KC - CK: Agenda Check Register Poru-ait Layout Tame: 15:35 2 CITY OF F2ANCI-1O CIJCt1iYLO1VGA P-52 Agenda Check Register 5/12/2010 through 1/25!2010 Chcck No. Check llate Veudor Name Amaunt .4P-0029711[ 5179l2U10 1%F,RIZONW[RELESS-LA. 133.29 AP-00297E1( 5/19/2010 VER[ZCYNWiRELESS-LA 59.BS AP - 00297 (t t 5%191207 0 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 19.82 AP - 002971 t I >/29i21}lU VEK.[ZON W [REL6SS - LA 59.82 AP - 002971 I 1 5/19/20[0 VERiZ,C)N WIRELESS - LA i9~82 AP-00297111 5/1912010 VER1Z<JNWIRELL-SS-LA 62.87 AP - 00^971 [ 1 5/19120 [0 VERIZON W[R.ELESS - L,4 48.1(1 AP-0029711( 5/'(9!2010 VERIZ_pNWIRELESS-E.A 36.33 AP-0(J297iC1 5/t9f2(170 VERIZON WiR'ELESS-LA 67.97 AP-00297711 5~'t9/2G1A VERIZON WCRP.,L,ESS-LA 50.68 AF - OU?,97111 5/[9/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 56.76 AF'-00297111 1/79/2010 VERIZ.,ON WIRELESS-[..A ~ 39.7 AP-00297L71 5I19/20L(1 VERIZ.QN W'1,RELESS-L,4 39,57 AP - (,1(729'] t t Si f 9;2(11 U VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 61.61 6lP - 00297111 5/19,'20 t 0 VERIZ.ON 4V[RELESS - LA 36.33 AF'-0(129711! ~'t9J2070 VER[ZUNWIREL,ESS-LA 36.33 AP - 002971.11 5![9/2010 VER[ZON WIR.GI_.ESS - LA 47.66 AP - (}0297111 5/19/2010 VERIZON W[RELESS - LA 36.58 AP-oo29717t Sn9lzelo vEluzoNW1RELESS-LA ~ <}?•25 AF - 0(1297ll I 5/19/2010 VEIiIZON W [REL,ESS - L.A 36.45 AF - OU2971 t 1 5/(9/2010 VER[ZON W[RF.,L,ESS - LA 39.32 AP - 00297 L I [ 5/19/2010 VE[LIZON W[RF..L,ESS - LA 37.69 AP - 0029711 1 5/19!2010 VEItIZON WIRELESS - LA 46.60 AP - 0029711 t 5!19.'2010 VGRILO'N WIRELESS - LA 84.3.4 AP - 0029711 ! S; 79120E 0 VEKFZQN WIRELESS - LA 39.32 AP-00297(11 Sr'U/2070 VERIZONW[RELESS-LA 39.7 A P - 00297 711 1/ 7 9.2010 l`ERIZC)N WIRELESS - L_A 4032 AF-00^_97111 5/19?2010 VERIZON W[RELESS-LA 78,98 AP - 0029711 I 11'19;'2070 VERIZON W[RELESB - L.A 45.01 r1P-00297111 Sii9/2070 VEKEZONWIR.ELEES-L.q 59.82 AP-OU2977tL 5%19!20[0 VER€ZUNWIRELESS-LA 18.98 AP-0(`1297!11 Si19/20E0 VE.R[ZC)N WIRELESS-LA 3633 AP - 002977 l k 5:'19/2010 VER[Z,ON W [REi.,ESS - LA "75.01 AP-{1029711F 5119,'20(0 VERI7.,6NWfR[3E,ESS-LA 45.01 AP-00297111 5/79/20[0 VGRLZL)NW[RELP.SS-LA 36.33 AP - (}029711 ! 5/19.!2010 VER['ZC)N W[RELESS - LA 3633 AP - 002971 t i 5,''1913(.110 VERIZON WIRELESS - L,A 3635 9P-00297117 5/19/2(}i0 VERFZON WIRELESS-LA 36.33 AP - 002971 t l 1/19/2010 VER[ZON WIR.EL'ESS - LA 20.06 AP - Q0297 [ I t 5/19/2010 VERiZ,ON WiKELESS -1.A 0.07 .AP-00297}1( Si't9P_O10 VERIZ(1NWIF.EL.ESS-LA 36.33 AP - 002971 I1 1119/20!0 VERIZON WIRELESS - L9 35.53 AP - 00297Y 11 5/19/2010 VEItIZON WIRELESS • LA 39.63 AP - 0029? 1 I t 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 55. LO AF - 00297 l l 1 S/19/2010 VERIZf)N WIRELESS - LA 33.7 5 AP-00297711 5/19/2010 VER[ZON WIRE-LESS-LA 3>.53 AP - 002977 t l 5/1 912 0 1 0 VERIZON Wl32ELESS - LA 149.77 AP - 0029771 I 5/19/2010 VE[t1ZQN WIRELESS - LA 35.76 AP-U0297111 5/'19:20!0 VER[Z,C)N W[RELESS-LA. 47.33 AP-00297171 5/19/2010 VER[ZON WiRELGSS-LA 36.84 AF' - 002971 ! I Si'I W2C,' i 0 VERIZON W'[RELESS - I,A 4 (.33 AP-00297111 5/19/2010 VER[ZON\VIKELESS-LA 35.53 AP - 002971 I I 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 40.82 AP - 00297 E I k 5/[9/2010 VEFtIZGN WIRELESS - LA 35.53 [Jscr: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez ['age: 30 Current Date: 0126%207 Report:CR_AGENDA_ REG_PCIRTRAI 'C_RC - CK: A~eoda. Cfieck Re;;ister PaRraif Layout Time: t 5:35:"< CL`[Z' OF RANCHt} CiJCAIVIOPdGA P-53 A;;enlla Cheat: Resister 5%(2/30 t0 through 5/25/2010 Chet;lt. No. Check Date Ven<tur Name Amount AP-00297111 5/19/201D VERIZONW[RELESS-LA '35.53 AP - 00297111 5/ f 9/201 O VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 4&.70 AP - 00397 t i f Si 1.9/20 (0 VERIZUN WIRELL-SS - LA 45.52 AP - 0029711 1 5/19/3010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - I,:1 44.14 AP - 062971 i t Si 192010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - L,A 44.17 AP - 0102971 t 1 5/1912010 VERIZUN W IRP;LESS - LA 40..32 A,P - 0(12971 ll 5/I9/2010 VEK[ZON WIliELESS - L,A 40.32 AP - 0029'1 I I 5!19/2010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 39.32 AP - 00397111 5/19/'2010 VGRIZON WIRELESS - L.4 37.15 AP -06?971 t f 5/19/2010 V6R[7_ON W[PiL?1.,ESS - LA 39.57 AP - 0029711 1 5/!920!0 VERIZUN WiKGLESS - LA 37.99 AP - 002971. I 1 5%191""2(110 VERIZUN WIREI.,ESS - LA 95.88 AP - 002911 I 1 Si 1912010 V'ERIZ,UN WiREL.ESS - LA 41.33 AP - 002971 t l Si I9/201,0 VERIZON~ VJIRF.:L.ESS - LA 39.32 AP-0(1297111 5!19,20!0 VERIZONSt'[R.ELF..SS-LA >3:7"_ RP-00297111 SJIJ/2010 VEREZCNW[REL13,SS-LA 33.02 AI' -002971({ 5/l9/2010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 37.97 AP - 002971 L I 5 11 912 0 1 0 VERIZUN W 1RELE55 - LA 33.52 AP-00^97111 5'19;20(0 VERIZONVdIRF.,LESS-LA 33.5? AP - 602971 t 1 5/191; 0 LO VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 83.37 ,4P-Q0297111 5/14/2010 VERIZUN WIRELESS-LA 37.59 AP - 00297! 1 i 5/19!2010 VER.IZON W[PrLESS - L..A 39,07 AP-00297111 5/19:"10[0 VERIZ.ON WIRELESS-LA 42.32 AP - 6112971 i l 5/!912010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 4232 AP -90297111 5/19/2010 VERIZUN V~'1RGLESS - LA 42.32 AP - Ofi2971.11 1;19(2070 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 79.13 AP - 00297111. 5/l9/20!0 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 4232 AP - 60297 ! [ I .5.%i9/2010 VERIZON tiVIRELESS - LA 74.13 3P-002971 [I 5/(920!0 VERIZONt['1REL.ESS-LA 48.31 AP -00297111 x!!92010 VEKIZON WIRELESS - L.q 45.31 AP -002971 [ 1 5/19/2010 VERLZON WIRELESS - LA 82.77 AP - 00297111 $119/2010 VERIZON WIRLCJ~BS - LA 45.1( AP - 60'2971 (1 5/19/2010 VERIZUN W[RELESS - i..A 4731 AP-00297111 5/(9(2010 VER[T_CaN WIRELESS-1..A 45.56 AP-0029?111 Sr'I4i2G10 VERIZUN WIRELESS-LA 51.64 AP-00297111 5!113/2010 VERI'ZON WIRELESS-LA 43.58 AP - 602971 ! I 5/19/2010 VGRIZ,ON W1REL.L:SS - LA 35).82 Ai' - (102971 t ( Sr 19/2016 VER[Z(3N W1:d.ELESS - LA 37.82 AP - OE129711 L 5/(912010 VERIZ.ON W[RELESS - LA 8292 AP - 00'9711 I 5/19/2010 VERIZUN V%[RELESS - LA 3y~?'= AP - 002971 f I >/1920 (fl VERi7.ON W'IRELGSS - LA 46.57 AP - 002971 t F 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA S 1-31 AP - 002971! I Sit9%2010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 42. [2 AP - 002971 I I 5/19/2010 VERIZUN VIRELESS - LA 51.32 AP - 00297! t 1 1/19/2010 VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 42.52 AP - 00297E I1 5/19/2010 VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 45.01 AP - 0(12971 t 1 5/19;'2010 V%ELt1ZON WIRELESS - LA 41.32 AP -00297111 5/19!2016 VERIZUN WIRELESS - [.A 36.33 AP - 003971 I1 5/192010 VERIZUN WIRELESS - LA 73 <0 :±P - 002971 i I 5/19.%2010 VERIZUN L~'IILELESS - L A 59.8' AP-00297111 5/19%2616 VERIZUN WIRELESS-LA ~6.J5 .AP - 00297111 5i 19/2010 VE[tIZON R'iRELESS - Lp 36.33 AP - 002971 I 1 5!1912010 VER,iZUN WiRELES9 - LA 3ls33 AP-00297111 51t9r'20(0 VEPaIZUNWIR.ELESS-LA -- ---- - _ _ __ - 36.67 -- --..... _ ---- - _.. f.. _ __ t ser. ~ I.OPEZ - Vetronica Lopez -- _ Page: 3i Current Date: 0526/20'! Report:CK_AGENDA_ KECi_PORTRAI T_RC - Ch: Agenda Check Rester Pomnit Layoet Time: 15:35:2 CITY OF' RANCHO CTJCAM.ONCrA P-54 A~•enda Check Resister 5/12/2010 [hroueh 5/25/20] 0 Checl< No. Check Date Vendor Namc Amow[t AP - 002971 l 1 5/1.9/2010 VER.TZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 t ( 5/19/2010 VERIZON R'IRELESS - LA 73.61 AP - 0029711 1 _5,'1.9/2010 VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 36.'3 AF - 002971 I 1 5/1912010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 00297111 5/19/2U 10 VERV,ON WIftEL.ESS - LA 30.53 AP - 00297711 5/19/2010 VEK[ZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 I 1 5/19/20 (0 VERI7.ON WIRELESS - LA 30.53 AP - 00297 t t I 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.37 AP - 002971 l l 5/79/2010 VERLZON LV[KELESS - LA 44.75 .4P - 00297] F 1 5/1912010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 44.75 AP - 002971 I [ 5/19:'2010 VGRILUN WIRELESS - LA 75 .18 .4P - 0029?1 t k Si19/2010 VERIZON W1REL.ESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 I 1 5/79/2010 VERIZUN WIRE(-ESS - LA 59.82 AP - 002971 i l 5!79'2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 0029711 l 5/19YZOI0 VER[ZON W'IR.ELESS - LA 79.36 AP - 002971 I I Si 19;2010 VF.RI7.ON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 AP -00297111 Si 19/2010 VER[ZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 .4P-00297111 5/L9/ZOIO \!ERIZ.ON WIRELESS-LA 41.33 AP - 002971 t I 5/i 9/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 86.79 AP - 002971(1 5%19/2010 VERLZON \V[RELESS - LA 47.42 AP - 0029711 L 5/19!2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 L 1 5/19/2(110 VERIZON W1REL.ESS - L,A 37.82 AP - 002971 I 1 5/19/2010 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 36.33 AP - 002971 L2 5;19/2010 VERIZON 18.85 AP-002971(2 5/19;20 t0 VER[ZON 79.40 AP-00297112 5/i9/2010 VER[ZON 37.68 ~ AP - 00297112 5719(2010 VEI:IZON 15.33 .AP-00297113 5!19/2010 VE[UZON 37.74 AP - 002971 l2 5%19!2010 VER17_ON 16.78 AP - 002971 l2 5;1912010 V F.RFZON 37.74 AP-00297112 5/79/2010 V'E1tIZON `14.75 AP-00297112 5/1972010 VERIZ_ON 39.64 AP-00297113 5/(9.~201U Verizon 66?3 AP - 00297 L I4 5!19%2010 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 170.67 AP - 002971 [4 Si 1912010 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 81:_'6 AP - 00297 t 14 5%19!2010 WAL"[EELS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 784.56 .4P-0(1297114 5119!2010 WAL"PERS14rHC)L,ESALEELECTR.I000 77.90 AP -002971 l4 1'19/2010 WALTERS WHOLESALE E.LEC'T'RIC CO 54.38 AP - 002971 id ?!19/2010 WACI'ERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CU 256.11 AP - 00297114 5/19,'2010 WA.L'fERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC C0 238.84 AP-002971 i5 5/L9I2(110 WA,YIESAN[TARYSUPPLY 47332 AP - 00297115 5/19!2010 \1%AXiE SANITARY SUPPLY 189.46 AP - 00297110, 5/19/2010 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 16.81 AP-00297117 5/1.9/2010 WESTERN FLOORINGINC 1,690.00 AP - 002971 t7 S/L9P0I0 WESTERN FLUORINE INC d,I5Q00 AP - 002971 l9 5/19/2010 Z.EE MEDICAL LNC 359.38 AP - 00297019 5; L9i2010 Z.EE MF,D[CAL. [NC L4LS9 AP - 00297119 5/(9/2010 'LEE MEDICAL 1NC 209.85 AP-00397120 5/20;2010 (NLANDVALL,EYDAILYBULLETIN 360.00 AP - 00297120 5/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BiJLLET[N 226'5 AP - 00397120 5/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 177.50 AP-00297120 5'20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DACLY BULLETIN 270.00 AP - 00297120 5/20/2010 [N LAND VALLEY DAELY BULLETIN 267.50 ~ AP - 00297120 5/20/20[0 [NLANU VALLEY DAILY BCILLETIN SOO.OU User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 32 Current Date: OSi2~`301 ort:CK AGENDA Re PORTRAI REG RC - GK: Agenda C;heck Register Portrai,r Layou( T Time: 15:35:2 _ _ p _ _ CITY OF I2ANCIIO CUCAMONGA Avenda Ctteck Resister sn 2n_oI a ~nrou,h Sr2s/2o t o Check No. AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297 120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 .4F - 00297120 A P - 00397 ! 20 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 AP - 00297120 A P - 00297120 :1I' - 00297121 AP - 00297121 A P - 00297'(21 AF' - 00297121 AP -(1(1297121 AP - 00297121 .4P - 00297121 AP - 00297121 AP-00297121 AP - 00297121 AP - 002971'_' I AP - 00297121 .4P - 0029712 L .4P - 00297121 ,4P - 00297121 AP - 00297121 AP - 00297 121 .4P - 00297!24 EP - 00001069 EP - 00001070 EP - 0000 L071 EP - 00001071 EP - 00041072 EP -1)000 t 072 EP - OOOO 1073 EP - 00(101073 F.,P - 00001074 EP • uooolo7s E P - 0000107( EP - 00001077 L-P - 00001077 EP - 00001078 Check Date Vendor Name 5/20Y2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BCILLEI'IN 5/20/20[0 INLAND Y'ALLEl' DAILY BULLETIN 5;20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETRJ 5/20%2010 INLAND tiALLEI' DAILY BULLETIN 5/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 5 /2 0120 1 0 INLAND VALLEl` DALLY BULLETIN 5120/2010 INLAND VALLEY DALLY HULLET[N >/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY HULLET[N 5/20/2010 WLANU VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN %20(2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY-BULLETIN 5/20/20(0 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN >/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 5/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DALLY BULLETIN 5/20/2010 INLAND VAI.L,EY DAILY BULLETIN 5/20/2010 INLAND VALLEY DAILY HUL,LF.:T[N 5(20;2010 'fRlJGREF.;N LANLCARE 5/20/2010 "1"RUGItF_EN LANDCARE, 5/20/2010 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,'20/2010 TRLtGR:EEN LANDCAPE 5/20/2010 C'RUGREL'N C.ANDC:ARE 5/20/20!0 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5 /2 012 0 1 0 TR[JCiREF..N LANUCAR.F 5/2(1/2010 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5!20/2010 TRUGtEEN LANDCARE s/20/?O10 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5/20/2010 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5!20/2010 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5;20/2010 TRUGREEN LANDCARP_ 5 /2 012 0 1 0 TRUGREEN' LANBC.AfLE s/20!2U10 TRUCiREENLANDCARE 5/20/20[0 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5.°202010 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 525/2010 BUSE-Y, JOHN F. Total for Check iD AP: 5/12'2010 AS'l'RUM Lr[ [CITY SERVICE6 5'12(2010 BLACK ~ti VEATCH CORP s/12/2010 FORTISTr1R htE:IH.4NE GROUP LLC. 5/12/2010 FORTISTAR ME'PH.ANE GROUP C:LC 5/12120(0 MACDONALD,JAh-t[E 5!12/2010 MACDONALD, J.4M[E _1,/(2/2010 MICHAEL, L. DENNLS 5/12/201(1 MiCHAEt„ L. DENNIS 5/1220L0 SPLE:L,L ENERGY NOR'CH AMERICA 5!12'2010 VF,RNON; CITY OF 5/121^_010 VLA9YN [NC 5119/20(0 CALIF GOVER'di<fENT 4BBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 5/19/2010 CALIF GUVBRNMENT VEHA/RANCHO CUCAMC 5/19/2010 PILOT POWER GROUP INC Total for Check [D EP: P-55 Amount 365.00 807.50 3!7.50 303.75 325.00 33125 347.50 267.50 507.50 807.50 311.25 47250 882.50 503.75 273.75 11,147.29 65.897.32 19.806.93 864 57.34 23.54 t .07 L°,326.55 496.54 ^,556.32 4,569.60 3,377.31 1,709.63 2,166.03 664.83 J2R 75 5.476.35 8,913.86 16203 1,4fi3,163.91 R;4so.on x,425.00 87.631.16 80,4.45.46 744.00 f 2 7.50 114.50 s.oo 217,588.80 174,99u.ou 3,000.00 475.00 I , t 25.00 27,752.88 604.873.30 Total for Entity: 2,068,037 21 [iser: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 33 Report:CK_AGENDA_[LEG_PORTRAI'f_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Current Date: <15i2C~20E Time: 1535:2 STAFF REPORT N;'~r'. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council G'UCAMONGA Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III Subject: APPROVAL AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS RECEIVED FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES, FOR A SENIOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES -OLDER AMERICANS ACT TITLE III B GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $7,500 (REVENUE FUND ACCOUNT: 1258000-4740 EXPENDITURE FUND ACCOUNT: 1258401-5300) RECOMMENDATION: To approve and appropriate funds received from the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult Services, fora Senior Supportive Services, Older Americans Act Title III B Grant in the amount of $7,500 (Revenue Fund Account: 1258000- 4740;Expenditure Fund Account: 1258401-5300). BACKGROUND: The San Bernardino County of Department of Aging and Adult Services desires to provide services to seniors to improve or maintain choice, independence and qualfty of life and has been allocated Older Americans Act funds from the California Department of Aging to provide such services. City of Rancho Cucamonga, Community Services Department was a contractor for the County this past year for the provision of such services to seniors. Staff has recently been notified by the County that the City has been approved for an addftional $7,500 grant for this upcoming fiscal year. Funds received through this grant would continue to be used for free recreation classes and programs for Senior Citizens. Specifically, staff will focus on recreation activities which focus on physical, social, psychological, educational and recreational needs of older persons. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant award is $7,500.00 for fiscal year 2010.-2011. An in-kind match of $1,200 will be . provided by the Community Services in the form of marketing, staff oversight and supplies which will be covered through the Department's 2010-2011 budget. P-56 Community Services Director t:l COMMSERVICounCil&BoardslCityCounclllStal/RepoRS120101Approval.AppropFundsCoun(y. SeniorServicesGrant.6.2.10. doc MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFITCE Date: June 2, 2010 To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency President and Members of the Fire Board Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Debra L. McKay, MMC, Records Managers/Assistant City Clerk By: Kathryn L. Scott, CMC, Assistant City Clerk Subject: APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL It is recommended the Agency/Fire Board/City Council direct staff to proceed with the biennial review of their Conflict of Interest Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the Political Reform Act, all local governments and agencies must update their Conflict of Interest Code in 2010. Prior to July 1, 2010, all Agency/Fire District/City staff will be noted of the pending update and will be requested to review any changes to designated positions, such as changes in title or duties, or creation or elimination of positions. Pursuant to state law, after a thorough review has been made, the City Clerk's Office will bring this item back to the Agency/Fire Board/City Council prior to October 1, 2010, to propose any appropriate amendments as needed. If amendments are needed, they must be approved by the Agency/Fire Board/City Council prior to December 30, 2010. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~` De ra L. McKay, MMC Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk STAFF REPORT - J COMMUMTY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director By: JoAnn Gwynn, Community Services Supervisor Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION TO APPROVE A LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED FOR MINORS, MAJORS, JUNIORS AND SENIOR DIVISIONS ALL -STAR TOURNAMENT HOSTED BY DISTRICT 71 LITTLE LEAGUE DURING JUNE 26 -JULY 22, 2010, AT HERITAGE AND RED HILL COMMUNITY PARKS RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Commission is recommending that the City Council approve a temporary variance of the Light Usage Policy to allow use until 11:00 p.m. on the little league (60') and senior division (90') fields at Heritage and Red Hill Parks June 26 -July 22, 2010 (excluding Sundays). Any use after 10:00 p.m. will be limited within those parameters as mentioned below and per the requirements listed in the attached Light Variance Policy. BACKGROUND: District 71 Little League, on behalf of Alta Loma and Citrus Little Leagues who are hosting this regional All-Star Little League tournament, is requesting a light variance during the tournament dates listed above. They plan to host the Minor and Junior Divisions at Heritage Community Park and the Major and Senior Divisions at Red Hill Community Park. The Light Variance Policy allows for light variance requests that would enable youth sports groups to use the field lights past the standard curfew of 10:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday for special occasions such as regional Little League All-Star Playoffs. If a variance to the field policy curfew is approved, this allows games to continue past 10:00 p.m: due to injuries, extra innings, or other reasons that have caused game(s) to last longer than scheduled. Most games will conclude by 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years and variances have been permitted on a regular basis. The Community Services Department has not received any complaints during the last ten years that Little Leagues All-Star Competitions have been conducted at Heritage and Red Hill Park Community Parks. Some of the more important requirements that the little leagues will be bound to are listed within the Light Variance Policy and include, but are not limited to the following: P-58 P-59 LIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTBY DISTRICT 21 FOR TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD JUNE 26 THROUGH JULY 22, 2010 TUNE 2, 2010 PAGE 2 1. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to the parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. 2. Fliers detailing the Tournaments specifics must be delivered in person to each area resident or weighted in some fashion to their home's doorstep. The flier must also include home phone numbers of a district or regional representative and any league presidents. The entire flier process will be accomplished at league expense. 3. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the tournament. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. Announcing will be limited to: • General welcome • Introduction of teams • Announcement of player to the plate • Recap of runs and score between innings • Play-by-play announcing will not be permitted 4. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, whichever is closer. 5. The P.A. system use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless othervvise approved by City Council. No lights are permitted on Sunday. ANALYSIS: The requested light variance would apply to the three baseball diamonds located at Heritage Park and the two baseball diamonds on the north side of Red Hill Park. Staff requests the City Council continue with their current policy of providing a curfew light variance only for extended, overtime or extra innings, which is necessary for tournament play. At the May 20, 2010, Park and Recreation Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed District 71 Little League's light variance request and approved staffs recommendation to forward this request to the City Council for final consideration. fitted, Community Services Director I:\COMMS ERV\Council&Bca rds\CityCounciRStarfReports\2010\Llght VarianceLL.060210.tloc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PULI(:Y NU.: bUU-4U RANCHO C;UCAMONGA PAGE 1 OF 3 EFFECTIVE: November 1, 1992 G'ALIFORMA REVISED: January, 2001 APPROVED: March 15, 2007 SUBJECT: LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PURPOSE: To specify guidelines for the request and use of sports field lights after normal operating hours. POLICY: The following procedures will be followed by all community based youth sports organizations who desire to request and use lighted sports fields after normal operating hours. GENERAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES: There are some occasions throughout the yearthat may require a youth sporting event to exceed the normal 10:00 p.m. sports fields' light curfew. However, it is important to develop some procedures that insure that neighboring residents are not negatively impacted by an approved light variance. Outlined below is a set of guidelines that specifies a process for requesting such a variance and how it should be implemented. Non-profit community based youth sports organizations may request a variance to extend light use for City park sports fields beyond normal operating hours. Current operating hours conclude at 10:00 p. m. Monday through Saturday and no use of lights is permitted on Sundays. The request must be for a special occasion of some type such as Regional Little League All Star Playoffs, etc. The variance is limited only to games that were scheduled to conclude by 10:00 p.m. but because of injury, extra innings, or other unforeseen circumstances the game was not able to finish in time. Normal league play or practices are not eligible for consideration under this request. 3. A request must be submitted in writing to the Community Services Director two months prior to their requested use. This allows the department to review their request and submit it for review and approval to the Park and Recreation Commission and the City Council. 4. The request must then be presented to the Park and Recreation Commission for their review and approval. 33 LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 2 of 3 5. The Park and Recreation Commission must then forward their recommendation to the City Council for their final review and approval. 6. If such a request receives final approval from City Council then that organization must provide home phone numbers and a fact sheet giving details of the tournament. Furthermore, it must be distributed by the leagues or organization to homeowners within two blocks of the City park (s) two weeks before the toumament or event. The flier must be delivered in person to each resident orweighted in some fashion to their doorstep. The flier will include home phone numbers of a district or regional representative and any league presidents. In addition, any pay or designated phones at the sports fields will also be provided so immediate contact can be obtained with the tournament directors. This will be accomplished at league expense. 7. "NO PARKING" signs will be posted on the resident side of streets adjacent to parks in use on Saturdays and Sundays by the requesting organization with signs provided by the City. 8. A separate flier will be distributed to league or tournament participants stating that no noisemakers are allowed and that participantslguests are requested to leave the park area quietly. 9. Overflow parking will be monitored by the requesting organization and signage provided directing participants to park at additional parking facilities nearby. Prior approval must be obtained to use these parking facilities. 10. Organized scheduled athletic events sound amplification equipment will be allowed in City parks, but limited to public address systems, stereo equipment, stationary and portable components and bull horns, subject to the following conditions: a. Request to use the Public Address (P.A.) System must be included on the field use application or submitted separately prior to any usage. b. Amplified sound systems will be checked prior to the toumament or event and the organization must keep the level of sound below the City's required decibel level. Staff will drop in unannounced to monitor at least three times a week during the tournament. A fee of $90 will be paid in advance to cover monitoring costs. If additional monitoring is needed, the user organization will be billed at $10.00 an hour. Announcing will be limited to: General welcome. Introduction of teams. Announcement of player to the plate. • Recap of runs and score between innings. 34 LIGHT VARIANCE POLICY PAGE 3 of 3 c. Furthermore, power limits are to be set so as not to exceed 74DBA at 300 feet in circumference from the source or property line, which ever is closer. No sound from a Community Services approved event can exceed a noise level (slow, 74dBA, "A" weighted scale) measured at the nearest property line, for a cumulative period of not more than five (5) minutes in any one hour, whether or not the sounds are live, recorded, amplified or necessary to the event (i.e. generators). d. All user organizations will be responsible for guaranteeing the sound level not exceed 74DBA. e. The direction of sound from the P.A. System speakers will be toward spectators and/or bleacher areas and away from residential areas. f. The P.A. System use will be permitted only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless otherwise approved by City Council. g. Only persons 18 years and older will be allowed to operate the Public Address System. h. All Public Address System use for athletic events must pertain to the game being played. Special announcements should be kept to a minimum. In no case will play-by-play announcing be permitted. i. Failure to comply with the above requirements by user groups will result in one of the following: First Offense: Verbal warning followed by written communication. Second Offense: Payment of staff time to monitor sound system at rate set in Music and Amplification Policy at the next set of games. Third Offense: Loss of system use. 11. Sports field lights are to be turned off as soon as possible after the completion of the last game, but not to exceed 11:00 p.m. I:COMMSERV IPollciesl Policies-ApprovedPollciesLLighlVarfancePa/icyapproved07 35 P-63 STAFF REPORT ~ ~ ~ - r PLANNLNG DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 (1UCAMONGA To: Mayor and City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James Troyer, AICP, Planning Director Subject: AMENDMENT TO THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY (210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT .BACKGROUND: The Corridor Design Authority (210 Foothill Freeway) Joint Powers Authority (JPA) was formed on September 13, 1994 to assist the cities involved with the planning and design of the 210 Foothill Freeway extension. Due to the importance of the freeway expansion to each City along the route, the original Agreement required the cities to have two voting mer~ibers from each City Council and one alternate (staff member). The seven (7) cities included in the JPA are Claremont, Fontana, La Verne, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto and Upland. The Authority is currently addressing many on-going issues of interest including freeway landscaping, maintenance and billboards. The cities are using this quarterly JPA meeting as a strong bond of communication with Caltrans in both Districts 7 and 8 (Los Angeles and San' Bernardino Counties). DIRECTION: The Authority gave direction at their January 12, 2010 meeting to request that each City Council require only one (1) City Council voting member (with one altemate, which can be a staff member) instead of the two (2) now required, since the Authority is currently being used in a more informational capacity. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council to approve the attached Amendment for the Corridor Design Authority (210 Foothill Freeway) Joint Powers Authority to require only one (1) representative to serve from each City Council with one (1) alternate, which can be a staff member. Respectfully Submitted, Jar>Yes R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director Attachments: Exhibit A Amendment No. 2 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Draft City Council Resolution JRT/w P-64 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT (CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY) THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 to Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement ("Amendment No. 1 ") is made and entered into this day of , 2010, by and between the Cities of Claremont, Fontana, La Verne, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto, and Upland, California municipal corporations (individually and collectively, "Agency" and °Agencies.") A. Recitals. (i) On or about September 13, 1994, the Agencies entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement thereby creating the Corridor Design Authority (the "Agreement.") (ii) Section 2.03 of the Agreement provides that the Corridor Design Authority shall be governed by a board of directors composed of two city council members from each Agency, with alternates for each. (iii) The Corridor Design Authority and each of the Agencies desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the governing board of directors of the Authority to be composed of one city council member from each of the Agencies, together with an alternate. B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and conditions contained herein, the Agencies agree as follows: Section 2.03 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read to as follows: "Section 2.03. Board of Directors. "The Authority shall be governed by a Board of Directors composed of seven (7) members. Each Agency shall appoint one of its council members to serve in his or her individual capacity as a member of the Board of Directors without compensation. Each Director shall be entitled to one (1) vote, and shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing Agency until his or her respective successor is appointed and qualified. Each Agency shall appoint an alternate member who may be a member of the Agency's staff, and such alternate member shall be entitled to vote at any meeting of the Authority in the absence of the Director for whom the alternate serves." 2. Within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Amendment No. 2 each Agency shall elect to retain one of the current two members it last P-65 appointed to the Board of Directors, or it shall appoint a different city council member to serve as a Director. 3. Except as expressly and specifically modified by this Amendment No. 2, each and every term and condition of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Agencies have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first set forth above. CITY OF CLAREMONT, CALIFORNIA ey; Title: ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney CITY OF FONTANA, CALIFORNIA By: Title: ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney P-66 ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: CITY OF LA VERNE, CALIFORNIA By: Title: CITY OF MONTCLAIR, CALIFORNIA By: Title: City Attorney P-67 ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk Approved as to Form: City Attorney CITY OF UPLAND, CALIFORNIA By: Title: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA By: Title: 4 P-68 ATTEST: Clerk Approved as to Form: CITY OF RIALTO, CALIFORNIA sy: Title: City Attorney P-69 RESOLUTION NO. /0- O 7 H A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CORRIDOR DESIGN AUTHORITY (210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT, TO CHANGE THE VOTING MEMBERSHIP OF THE AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the Corridor Design Joint Powers Authority (Authority) which was formed on September 13, 1994, pursuant to the joint powers agreement approved by City Council Resolution No. 94-017. 2. The City Council and other Authority members now desire to approve Amendment No. 2 to that agreement to revise the membership requirements for the Authority Board of Directors. 3. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during its ~ June 2, 2010 regular meeting, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Authority consists of seven (7) participating cities; Claremont, Fontana, La Verne, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, Rialto and Upland, pursuant to a Joint Powers Agreement ("Agreement"). b. The Agreement currently requires each member city to provide as voting Board of Directors members, two Councilmembers and one Alternate (staff member acceptable). c. The member cities have tentatively agreed to alter the Board of Directors voting membership to require that each City shall provide only one Councilmemberwith one Alternate (staff member acceptable). d. Revising the voting membership of the Board of Directors, by executing Amendment No. 2, is in the best interests of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby resolves as follows: a. That Amendment No. 2 preserves the accepted decision-making role of the Joint Powers Authority; and b. That Amendment No. 2 will promote the effectiveness of the Authority by providing a means for an attainable voting Board of Directors membership and thereby promote the overall purposes of the Authority. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 10-XX 210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AMENDMENT June 2, 2010 Page 2 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, above, the City Council approves Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2010. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Donald J. Kurth, M. D., Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 2nd day of June 2010. Executed this 2nd day of June, 2010 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. P-70 Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk STAFF REPORT - ADMINIS"I'RAT7VE SERVICES DEP.~IRTI~ff,NT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: John Gillison, Assistant City Manage By: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manager Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF MICROSOFT SOFTWARE, INCLUDING SQL SERVER, WINDOWS SERVER, AND WINDOWS SERVER CLIENT ACCESS LICENSES IN THE AMOUNT OF $93,875 TO DELL, UTILIZING WESTERN STATES CONTRACT ALLIANCE (WSCA) CONTRACT NUMBER 827160, FOR FY 2009/10 AS FOLLOWS: $34,731 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1001209-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE) AND $59,144 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5152 (COMPUTER EQUIPMENTlTECHNICAL REPLACEMENT FUND-COMPUTER SOFTWARE) It is recommended that the City Council approve an award to purchase Microsoft software, including SQL Server, Windows Server, and Windows Server Client Access Licenses in the amount of $93,875 to Dell, Utilizing Western States Contract Alliance (WSCA) Contract Number 627160, for FY 2009/10 as follows: $34,731 from Account No. 1001209-5152 (Computer Software) and 559,144 from Account no. 1714001-5152 (Computer Equipment/Technical Replacement Fund- Computer Software). BACKGROUND The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses Microsoft software for centralized and distributed computer services. Additional Microsoft licenses are necessary in order to meet the City's needs and to replace licenses that are outdated and are approaching the end of their useful life. The Information Services Division provided specifications to Purchasing for review and to determine a method of procurement to be in the City's best interest. Purchasing solicited a formal request for quote from three (3) vendors that have been awarded competitively bid contracts. The solicitation resulted in two responses and one (1) no response Based on an analysis by Purchasing and the I.S. Division staff it has been determined that Dell has submitted the lowest, most responsive, responsible quote, utilizing WSCA contract number 627160. P-71 P-72 STAFF REPORT ~ - w ~~ ADMINIS'IR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPdRTMEIvT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 cUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Services Manager4m~ Dawn Haddon, Purchasing Manager j~C" Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE IN THE AMOUNT OF $180,307 TO NEXUS IS, UTILIZING THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE'S COMPETITIVELY BlD CONTRACT NUMBER RIVCO-02420-002- 5/13 FOR FY 2009110 TO BE FUNDED FROM THE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT/TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND AS FOLLOWS: $81,130 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), $98,521 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5215 (O8:M/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), AND $656 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE); ALSO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF $61,400 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1714001-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT) TO 1714001-5215 (O&M/COMPUTER EQUIPMENT) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an award for the purchase of network equipment and software in the amount of $180,307 to Nexus IS, utilizing the County of Riverside's competitively bid contract number RIVCO-02420-002-5/13 for FY 2009/10 to be funded from the Computer EquipmentlTechnology Replacement fund as follows: $81,130 from Account No. 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment), $98,521 from Account No. 1714001-5215 (O&M/Computer Equipment), and $656 from Account No. 1714001-5152 (Computer Software). An approval is also requested to transfer $61,400 from Account No. 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay- Computer Equipment) to 1714001-5215 (O&M/Computer Equipment). The transfer is necessary to move funds to anon-Capital Outlay account since the unit price for some equipment that was estimated to cost over $5,000 has been bid at less than $5,000. BACKGROUND The Information Services Division oversees the management of data network services for the City. This award will allow staff to replace network equipment that is past its useful life, is no longer vendor supported, and does not conform to established standards for performance and security. P-73 APPROVAL TO PURCHASE NETWORK EQUIPMENT AND SOF"I'WARE FROM NEXUS IS PAGE 2 luNr_ 2, ?010 The Information Services Division provided specifications to Purchasing for review and to determine a method of procurement to be in the City's best interest. Purchasing solicited a formal request for quote from three (3) vendors that have been awarded competitively bid contracts. The solicitation resulted in two responses and one (1) no response. Based on an analysis by Purchasing and the I.S. Division staff, it has been determined that Nexus IS has submitted the lowest, most responsive, responsible quote utilizing the County of Riverside's competitively bid contract number RIVCO- 02420-002-5/13. This equipment will be ordered without an annual maintenance contract, but includes a limited manufacturer warranty. Maintenance for this equipment will be consolidated as part of a FY 10/11 award for network maintenance renewals and an appropriate appropriation will be requested. ~3-- ,~ ~ '== ::~ T H E C I T Y O F -___ _. RANCtIO CU CAM ONGA Staff Report DATE: June 2, 2010 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager BY: Ingrid Y. Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY INTO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 LOCATED ON EAST AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST OF FISHER DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY BISHOP PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation of certain property to Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) and Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said Resolution. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS St Clare Assisi Episcopal Church was originally annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7. Staff received a request from the Church for deannexation from the two Districts and submitted said request for approval. City Council held a public hearing on May 19, 2010 and approved Resolution No. 10-072 removing the parcel from both LMD No. 7 and SLD No. 7. Bishop Protestant Episcopal Church, the owner of the property has signed a Consent and Waiver to have the Church property annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 and this would maintain compliance with Proposition 218. The signed Consent and Waiver Annexation forms are on file in the City Clerk's Office. P-74 Attachment: Resolution P-75 RESOLUTION N0. lO - Q ~-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 LOCATED ON EAST AVENUE AND SOUTHEAST OF FISHER DRIVE (APN 0227- 071-17) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act"), said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 and Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "Districts") and; WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Districts; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the Districts, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the Districts on the property proposed to be annexed to such Districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the Property"), and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property be aimexed to the Districts in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Property have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Property have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Property to the Districts and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Property to the Districts; and P-76 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Property have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Property set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Property have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Property from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed amtual assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Property. (3} Only the specia! benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Property from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Property to the Districts and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Property in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: "1'he City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Property do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Property from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Property by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Property to the Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Property and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Property in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. P-77 SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the llistrict, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Property. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2010. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Donald J. Kurth, M.D., Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice C. Reynolds; City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Counci] of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on .2010. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Exhibit A P-78 Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: BISHOP PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH The legal description of the Property is: THE WEST''/2 OF LOT 4, BLOCK "G", ACCORDING TO PRELIMINARY MAP OF ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OP SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, PAGE 24, OF MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. Assessor's Parcel Number of the Property: APN 0227-071-17-0000 P-79 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Yeaz 2010/2011 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda South Area. The vazious sites maintained by the district consist of pazkways, median islands, paseos, street trees and community trails. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project: None Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the South Etiwanda azea of the City. Generally, this azea encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the South Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project: None P-80 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2070/2011 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): The following table summazizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) for: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Sin le Family Parcel 1.00 $151.45 Multi-Famil ~ Parcel 1.00 $151.45 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 2.00 $151.45 Vacant Acre 0.25 $151.45 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 1 Pazcels x 1 EDU Factor x $151.45 Rate Per EDU = $ 151.45 Annual Assessment Assessor Parcel Number 0227-071-17-0000 has a San Bernardino County use code of Single Family Residential. However, this parcel includes both a single fanuly residence in addition to a church. Due to the location of the in-iprovements, in relation to the size and configuration of the property resulting in a reduced benefit, this parcel is being assigned an EDU value of 1.00. *There is no Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflator approved for this District's assessment. Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda): P-81 The following table summazizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) for: Land Use Basis EDU Factor* Rate per EDU* Sin Ie Famil Unit 1.00 $61.19 .Multi-Famil Unit 1.00 $61.19 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 2.00 $122.38 Vacant Acre 2.00 $122.38 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: Commercial/Industrial: APN 0227-071-17; 5 Acres x 2.00 EDU = 10 EDU 1 Fazcels x ]0 EDU Factor x $122.38 Rate Per EDU = $L223.80 Annual Assessment Assessor Parcel Number 0227-071-17-0000 has a San Bernardino County use code of Commercial/Industrial. However, this parcel includes both a single family residence in addition to a church. Due to the location of the street light improvements and the direct benefit received by these improvements the property is being assigned an EDU value of 10.00. *There is no Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflator approved for this District's assessment. P-82 EXHIBIT "A„ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 MUELLER CT FISHER DR APN WHITESTONE PL 0227-071-17 J a -~ n. w z St. Clare ~ 5 of c~ LL Assisi Church w PEAR CT ~ . x ¢ a ._. - CATALPA ST J a ~ w a z w ~ I °~ SMOKESTONE ST HIGHSTONE MANOR CT ' ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 6563 East Avenue STATE OF CALIFORNIA Agn 0227-071-17 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Public Wotks Services Department Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director P-83 ~ '~ ' ~. l ~~ ~' J - ~J~ r RnNCxo CocnMOVCn By: Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Aide Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $598,170, TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION, INC. OF SAN DIMAS, CALIFORNIA, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 15% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $89,726, FOR "CITYWIDE BRIDGE DECK MAINTENANCE, PHASE 2 OF 3" BASE BID PLUS ADDITIVE BIDS 1, 2, 4, 5, AND 6 PER THE ATTACHED BID SUMMARY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1 1 1 2303-5650/1 5421 1 2-0 ($477,326 CONTRACT AMOUNT PLUS CONTINGENCY OF $89,726) AND 1116303-5650!1 5421 1 6-0 ($120,844 CONTRACT AMOUNT). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $598,170, to the apparent low bidder, O'Donnell Construction, Inc. of San Dimas, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 15% contingency in the amount of $89,726, for "Citywide Bridge Deck Maintenance, Phase 2 of 3" base bid plus additive bids 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 per the attached bid summary to be funded from account 1112303- 5650/1542112-0 ($477,326 contract amount plus contingency of $89,726) and 1116303- 5650/1542116-0 ($120,844 contract amount). BACKGROUND ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 4, 2010, for the subject project. The engineer's estimate for the base bid plus the additive bids recommended to be awarded was $885,000. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the apparent low bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work to be performed in general consists of the construction of bridge approach slabs, treatment of concrete decks with methacrylate, removal and replacement ofjoint seals, removal and replacement of P.C.C. pavement and curb and gutter, removal and replacement of asphaltic concrete pavement and aggregate base materials, installation of metal beam guardrails, modified chain link fences, and other work incidental to the above construction activities. Re ffully s bmitt , William Wittkopf Public Works Servic s Director WW:ER:pf Citywide Bridge Deck Maintenance -Phase 2 of 3 Owner: City of Rancho Cucamonga A arent Low Bidder 2 3 PetersonlChase General Bid Opening: 05!04/t0 O'Donnell Construction Engineering Construction, c. Southland Construction 559 W Covina Blvd 1792 Kaiser Ave 3943 Irvine Bivd #AO San Dimas, CA 91773-29i 1 Irvine, CA 928145708 Irvine, CA 92602 US US US Bidder Status: Valid Bidder Status: Valid BldtlerStatus: Nvn•Rasoonsive Base Line Road at Cucamon a Creek Channel $139,375.50 $154,644.50 588 027.00 Base Bid: Cher Avenue at Hawker-Crawford Channel $120,941.00 $157 038.00 $97 450.00 Arrow Route at Cucamon a Creek Channel $152,219.8 $157,6811.52 $144 093.00 Additive Bid 1: 25th Street at Deer Creak Channel 573 961.50 $83,353.00 $66 213.00 Additive Bid 2: 9th Street at Cucamon a Creek Channel 571 961.25 $96 706.40 $60,029.00 Additive Bid 3: 24th Street at Dear Creak Channel S59,541.7 $81,694.00 $56,800.00 Additive Bid 4: 26th Street at Deer Creek Channel $32,710.7 $38,399.00 529,555.00 Additive Bid 5: Vehicular Brid a at Herita a Park over Damens Creek 53,500.0 $9,500.00 $4,500.00 Additive Bid 6: Vehicular Brid a over side Channel to Damens Creek S3 500.0 $9,500.00 $4,500.00 Additive Bid 7: Vehicular Brid a over Damens Creek West of Herita a Park $6,600.0 $19 000.00 $fi,OD0.00 Total Bid Amount 664,511.6 807,515.42 556,767.0 Listed Subs Alcorn Fence Company Alcorn Fence Company PO Box 3279 PO Box 3279 Riverside, CA Riverside, CA Metal Beam Guard Rail; Chain Link Railing Harris Rebar, Inc. - 1505 E Mission BI Pomona, CA 91766 Rebar Martinez Concrete 920 W Foothill Azusa, CA 91702 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Orange County Striping 163 N Pixley Orange, CA 92806 Siriping Western Paving Contractors, 15533 E. Arrow Hwy. Irwindale, CA 91706 Asphalt Paving 4 5 Western Structures 4-Con En Ineerin inc. 6005 Tyler St 2751 Avalon Street Riverside, CA 92503 Riverside, CA 92544 US US Bidder Status: Non-Res nsive Bidder Status: Non-Res onsive Base Line Road at Cucamon a Creek Channel $172,897.06 $239,234.00 Base Bid: Cher Avenue at Hawker-Crawford Channel $108,967.90 $170,455.00 Arrow Route of Cucamon a Creek Channel $112,554.87 $173,316.00 Additive Bid 1: 25th Street at Deer Creek Channel 564,463.33 $89,748.00 Additive Bid 2: 9th Street at Cucamon a Creek Channal $86 630.70 $96,152A0 Additive Bid 3: 24th Street et Deer Creek Channel 560,984,10 $77 727.00 Additive Bid 4: 26th Street et Deer Creak Channel $Sfi,223.11 $43,590.00 Additive Bid 5: Vehicular Brid a at Narita a Park over Demens Creek Si3,297.62 $4,000.00 Additive Bid 6: Vehicular Brid a over side Channel to Damens Creek $13,297.62 $4,000.00 Additive Bid 7: Vehicular Brid a over Damens Creek West of Herita a Park 817,095.22 $5,950.00 Total Bid Amount $706,391.53 $904,172.00 Listed Subs Alcorn Fence Company Alcorn Fence Company PO Box 3279 PO Box 3279 Riverside, CA Riverside, CA Fence Guardrail and Fence Harris Rebar, Inc. Goss Construction 1505 E Mission BI 87137 Flower Rd Pomona, CA 91766 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Rebar Deck Treatment LA Signal Harris Rebar, Inc. 155 N Eucla 1505 E Mission BI San Dimas, CA 91773 Pomona, CA 91766 Signal Rebar Orange County Striping Orange County Striping 183 N Pixley 183 N Pixley Orange, CA 921108 Orange, CA 92808 Traffic Striping Striping S.D. Mayo Paving Inc. PO Box 90730 San Bernardino, CA 92427 Paving -84 STAFF REPORT F,NGINEERING DEP~R'I'9~NT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician P-85 _~ RANCHO C,UGAMONGA Subject: Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Margarita Ortega-Paulli, for a single family residence, located on the north side of Nineteenth Street, east of Beryl Street RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. BACKGROUNDlANALYSIS The developer, Margarita Ortega-Paulli, of 9144 Nineteenth Street, located on the north side of Nineteenth Street, east of Beryl Street, requested a building permit for a single family residence. Street improvements area condition of issuing the building permit. The City does not require said improvements to be built at this time. Therefore, the developer has submitted a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of improvements on Nineteenth Street. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ar euer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alnv Attachment(s) P-86 RESOLUTION NO. /D-~ ~~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MARGARITA ORTEGA-PAULLI AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pavement established as prerequisite to issuance of building permit for 9144 Nineteenth Street has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Margarita Ortega-Paulli NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino Count, California. EXHIBIT A VICINITY MAP _~ . --- - - i -I ~,.~ ~~ i . i _~ ~ ~ -~ Z --__.~~`J- -- --- i --- I---I ~ ' \ i ; i- '; ~ ~, ~`PMT2009-D0919 ~ ~'~~~ j 00 \, i , ~- ~--- ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Division PMT2009-00919 VICINITY MAP (Not to Scale) P-87 P-88 STAFF REPORT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP,~RTMENT ~rY"J~ RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ,~ Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer[' Subject: ACCEPT THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-023 AS COMPLETE, APPROVE THE FINAL CONTPACT AMOUNT OF $98,495.66, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A CLAIM FOR THE REIMBURSEMENT OF APPROVED SANBAG FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ARTICLE 3, 20% TRANSIT ACCESS FUNDS AND APPROVE A RESOLUTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023 as complete, approve the final contract amount of $98,495.66, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, approve a resolution to authorize the City Engineer to file a claim for the reimbursement of approved SANBAG funding from the Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3, 20% Transit Access Funds and approve a resolution to order the annexation of the territory to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue scope of work consisted of planting of trees and shrubs, installation of irrigation and controllers, water meter, miscellaneous landscaping, PCC sidewalk and temporary A.C. sidewalk. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: - Budgeted Amount: - Account Number: - Engineer's Estimate: $120, 000.00 2660801-5650/1743660-0 $127,159.00 - Redevelopment Agency's Approval to Advertise: November 4, 2009 P-89 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Accept Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue June 2, 201 D Page 2 - Publish dates for local paper: - Bid Opening: Contract Award Date: - Low Bidder: - Contract Amount: - 10% Contingency: - Final Contract Amount: - Difference in Contract Amount: November 10 and 17, 2009 November 24, 2009 December 16, 2009 America West Landscape Inc. $99, 297.79 $9,929.78 $98,495.66 $-802.13 (-0.81 %) The net decrease in the total cost of the project is a result of one Contract Change Order, the Balancing Statement. The notable change that was significant to the decrease of the Contract amount was lesser amount of sidewalk, cobble paving, concrete header and shrubs than originally bid. The Balancing Statement accounts for the minor decrease in the actual bid quantities. On July 14, 2009, the San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) Board of Directors approved funding from the transportation Act (TDA) Article 3, 20% Transit Access Funds for the subject project in the amount up to $6,750.00. The TDA, Article 3 funds are made available for projects that improve access to transit stops for pedestrian and persons with disabilities. The TDA Article 3 award is considered a grant, and is paid through a reimbursement process upon completion of the project. The landscaping and hardscape areas being annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 consist of 4,279 square feet of low maintenance groundcover plants, 15 gallon trees and approximately 4,201 square feet of new hardscape, cobble, sidewalk and bus stop pad. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering ServiceslCity Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is Attachments `\ ~7 !N~N ~~\ 4'~~, ~v ~ fY V..nrol ~! llllltt Nlt 1111 !All 1111 llltl ~~,\ 11L11i111««tllllll«111«141111t1.. •:~ tll llillllltlllllllllillltil «l«IIlllt~. `: ~~ 1111 I11111111i1if 111111 11111 Illlllllillli~ ` ~\ ^~ 11111"'•`Iltllltl «It"" 11111 ` y r ~~ li' 1111111 "il Illllllit j'' c Illlltlll ~\,. ~ ~ +~ `11111 ' \ u g `111 \ S CJ~ ~ ~ 1,. ~ ,.. r f` - 111;11 , C.J w ~'' ~: , ~ r ~ '~ a N T ~\'• 3nv isd3 na~x~i'~E a l! 0 r ~. II la~ ~ ~~ ay ( i~ :3hY OhtYMLL3 ~..._ w .2 f~ `:•. C 7 Ot~ ~ ~ Yl d T~ ` ~. •~ C' N N ill 'M19 YC73a:1 I.Y i •: S'`•\ w ~~ ..,....N ... ......... ...... . i ......_.._.____. ... .......... m Sil ~......._._._~...._..... _~._._...: . il~l~ .._.._................ ~ '3Aa a31s3at~aa 'hV}YJ )r33ip Atld ' { u I ~ S o3°aYliU m I p ~ Q -~ ~ o M^ N35i IIYit „ ~ '3AY 3Nilll to '3AM N3 i'1YW z. F rn V~1 ~ .., m 3~f1 w ~' w ~.f ~' ~ < ~ ~33~~ u w ~ ~ tr, 3 N33a ~ • Kt~ u N ~ L s; s .I ~J" 3+1V N3AYH ~ Y ~N3AtrH I ~,~ j h-~ 1, N 4 A a3w w 1 3 a31tFiU ... iN < !~ $ I u~ Q ~~ '3M1tr YSUWa3N ~ '3)lY Y IYadi~ Iu^L~'~'f "3AY YNgMiYa ~ `I l c `,j Ilea ~ '3M1Y ff1Y@I av ~ 3nY mvsl aY -~ o ,~ _ '3AY SAKI ~ ~ Vr _ / '3AY M1Wll3 'u rr 3AY (NYW'1'1331.~ '3AY 1A1;3E oK H' ~ ~ ~ _ 1 ~ $ ~ w y N n ~A~ ~ 1 3A OaY:.3NlA JAY l7aYA3NN t C to "' '3qY Yf13Nak~ '3AY NYI~3 aYD ~- 5 3AY a NY a3r~af F ~ ~.a ~~ i .~rY~ ~ "Y Y l}3 i. 3alkddYS cYJ' II .~Aa ~ ;ad til JYUN 'sJ Yb IL')NYa ~!ti`~ k±tsv, ~'~ 5. ~ ~`~ ~ `c ~'~.. ~- U U E F~f U Q.+' ~^^~ h'( !~ O Q Q 1w~y 1'~ ~'f ~ O /'~''~ ~ 1'°I"y P-91 RESOLUTION NO. /D-O77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. RA09-023 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P-92 RESOLUTION NO. I Q-D7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A CLAIM FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF APPROVED SANBAG FUNDING FROM TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA), ARTICLE 3, 20% TRANSIT ACCESS FUNDS FOR THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE WHEREAS, the Base Line Road Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to 600' east of Rochester Avenue, Contract No. RA09-023, has been completed and accepted by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion has been filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the City Engineer is authorized to file a claim for reimbursement of approved SANBAG funding from the Transportation Development Act (TDA}, Article 3, 20% Transit Access Funds. P-93 RESOLUTION NO. ~ D' ~ ~ C~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY KNOWN AS THE BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO 600' EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE TO THE WORK PROGRAM WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance Districts; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the Maintenance District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finarice the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance District. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Territory to the Maintenance Districts, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit B. SECTION 3: All future proceedings of the Maintenance Districts, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. P-94 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property To Be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The description of the Property is: THE SOUTH PARKWAY ON BASE LINE ROAD FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 600 fEET EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPING FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE EAST 600' The above-described parcels are shown on sheet A-2 attached herewith and by this reference made a part hereof. A-1 -~d ~_.__ e r } e t e e y .,_ ,_ i i W z J W m r ~ ~ , ! e i ~ i ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ` i ~ I 3~N H~1S3H30a t H1N OfJ ~~ P-96 Exhibit B To Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2009 / 2010 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 {GENERAL CITY): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD #1) represents 23.63 acres of landscape area, 41.88 acres of parks and 16.66 acres of community trails that are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one particular area within the City, but rather benefit the entire City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The 41.88 acres of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Senior Center. Proposed additions to Work Program (Fiscal Year 2009 / 2010) For Project: BASE LINE ROAD PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE EAST 600' Turf SF Non-Turf # 1 4,279 Landscape/ Mulch 2,434 5' wide sidewalk 779 Bus Stop pad Trees EA ea 15 g B-1 P-97 STAFF REPORT ~~~~~ PUNNING DrnAxTn~[t_n~r 'L- RANCHO ~;UCAMONGA Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REVOKE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00283R FOR LOCO CANTINA & GRILL -Denial of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit because it is operating in a manner which is detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The City Council considered the appeal during a public hearing held on May 19, 2010 and directed staff to return with appropriate resolutions. Located in the Masi Plaza Center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0229-011-38. Related File: Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPEAL OF A PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO REVOKE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2007-00284R FOR LOCO CANTINA & GRILL -Denial of an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to revoke the Entertainment Permit because it is operating in a manner which is detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity. The City Council considered the appeal during a public hearing held on May 19, 2010, and directed staff to return with appropriate resolutions. Located in the Masi Plaza Center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard ,- APN: 0229-011-38. Related File: Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00283R. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the attached Resolutions denying the appeal of the Planning Commission decision revoking the Conditional Use Permit and the Entertainment Permit. BACKGROUND: The City Council considered the appeal during a public hearing held on May 19, 2010, and directed staff to return with appropriate resolutions. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: When the item was previously approved, the project was found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301, Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. This exemption covers minor alterations of the existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original environmental determination. The building was originally built, and had been used as, a restaurant. Revocation of CUP DRC2007- 6283R is also exempt under Section 15321 (Class 21 Exemption) as an enforcement action to P-98 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00283R AND DRC2007-00284R - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 2, 2010 Page 2 revoke a permit, and Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption) as a minor alteration to the land use limitations governing the subject property. CORRESPONDENCE: None. Respectfully submitted, ~~ e~ `- James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director J RT: LJ H/ge Attachments: Draft City Council Resolution Revoking Conditional Use Permit Draft City Council Resolution Revoking Entertainment Permit P-99 RESOLUTION NO. 10-080 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00283R EL LOCO CANTINA & GRILL, AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITH BAR AND ENTERTAINMENT WITHIN THE MAST PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-011-38 A. Recitals 1. On March 10, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga revoked Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00283R for EI Loco Cantina & Grill, an existing restaurant within the Masi Plaza Shopping Center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard ("the subject business") pursuant to Section 17.04.030(G)(3) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which authorizes the revocation or modification of a CUP if it is not being conducted in an appropriate manner. 2. On March 18, 2010, the owners of the business submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. 3. On May 19, 2010, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and concluded the hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been met. B. Resolution The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows. 1. All facts stated in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented during the May 19, 2010 public hearing on the appeal, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, the City Council finds as follows: a. On December 12, 2000, the City approved CUP 00-44 for the subject business to allow the sale of and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages (Type 47 liquor license) at a restaurant called Felipe's Mexican Restaurant occupying a lease space of approximately 2,800 square feet and an outdoor dining area of approximately 600 square feet. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2007-00283R-LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 2 b. On July 25, 2007, the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2007-00283R for the subject property, which superseded CUP 00-44, amended the permitted business hours, allowed for nightly entertainment seven days per week from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., approved a new floor plan that limited the entertainment area to 150 square feet, required an amendment to the CUP approval prior to any modification to the approved floor plan, an expansion of the bar area, or reduction in the seating area. The Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2007-00283R in conjunction with approval of Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R. c. Subsequently, the restaurant was sold to a new owner and renamed EI Loco Cantina Bar ~ Grill, and the floor plan was altered by the replacement of dining tables with bar-style tables, an expansion of the dance floor beyond the permitted 150 square feet, and the installation of nightclub-style lighting. These alterations occurred without prior City approval or modification of CUP DRC2007-00283R. d. On July 9, 2008, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to review the operation of CUP DRC2007-00283R and Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R and determine whether the operation of the business was consistent with its conditions of approval, detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, or injurious to properties in the vicinity. After the close of that hearing the Planning Commission voted to institute a 90-day review period to allow the business to bring the operation into compliance with its conditions of approval. e. On December 10, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted its 90- day review of the business at a duly noticed public hearing, and subsequently voted to modify the conditions of approval for CUP DRC 2001-00283R and called for another review of the business after 6 months. Among the modified conditions was a requirement that the business provide uniformed, licensed private security during the approved evening hours of entertainment. f. On September 9, 2009, City staff presented a report to the Planning Commission regarding the operation of the business and informed the Commission that the business was in compliance with its conditions of approval at that time. g. On September 15, 2009, the subject business cancelled its private security.service. h. On December 9, 2009, City staff presented the Planning Commission with a request from the Police Department for the Commission to initiate a review of the subject business due to the level of calls for police service at the subject business. The Planning Commission granted the request and set the public hearing on the matter for January 13, 2010. P-100 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2007-00283R-LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 3 i. On December 18, 2009, the subject business entered into a contract with Barry's Security, Inc. to provide one security guard on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. This leaves several days and times during which the business has no security during entertainment hours. j. On January 13, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to February 10, 2010 at the request of City staff. k. On February 10, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to February 24, 2010 at the request of the attorney for the subject business. I. On February 24, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing again at the request of the attorney for the subject business, who complained of inadequate time to review the staff report. The Planning Commission continued the hearing until March 10, 2010. m. On March 10, 2010, the Planning Commission reopened the continued public hearing and concluded it on that date. During the hearing City staff and the members of the Police Department presented evidence that the business was not in compliance with its conditions of approval due to cancellation of the security guard contract for approximately 3 months following the September 9, 2009 Planning Commission review and the occurrence of large numbers of persons dancing outside the 150 square foot entertainment area. Evidence was also presented that the conduct of the business was contrary to the peace, health, safety of the public due to the number and severity of police calls for service emanating from or connected to the business. n. At the March 10, 2010 Planning Commission public hearing, The subject business was represented by an attorney who complained that the business was given inadequate due process due to the presentation of hearsay evidence and the lack of an opportunity to cross-examine City staff and members of the Police Department. The Chair of the Planning Commission offered the business's attorney the opportunity to address any questions he had of staff and the Police Department to the Chair, but the attorney declined. o. After the close of the March 10, 2010 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to revoke CUP DRC2007-00283R. p. At the May 19, 2010 public hearing before the City Council, City staff and the Police Department presented substantially the same evidence and arguments as they presented to the Planning Commission; as did the attorney for the subject business. P-101 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2007-00283R-LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 4 3. The totality of evidence presented at the May 19, 2010 public hearing, including the facts set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution support the following conclusions and determinations: a. The subject business has been given adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard regarding the potential revocation of CUP 2007- 002838. The Planning Commission held multiple hearings and granted several continuances to the subject business. The business was represented by counsel the entire time before the Planning Commission and the City Council and the business was given repeated opportunities to offer evidence and rebut evidence presented against it. Complaints regarding the introduction of hearsay evidence and the lack of opportunity to cross-examine witnesses are without merit because the formal rules of evidence do not apply during the City's administrative hearings and the attorney for the business declined the opportunity offered to present his questions of staff to the Planning Commission Chair and Mayor. b. The subject business has violated the conditions of approval for CUP DRC2007-002838 through the cancellation of its security guard contract fora 3-month period, the inadequate security staffing since that time, and the expansion of its entertainment area beyond the permitted 150 square feet. c. The subject business is not consistent with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which it is located because it is operating as a de facto nightclub without the proper City approvals or the required Type 48 liquor license instead of as a an approved restaurant use. d. The subject business is being conducted in a manner detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare due to violations of its conditions of approval and as evidenced by the number and severity of police calls for service emanating from or associated with the business. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 2 and 3 of this Resolution, the City Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's action, and revokes CUP DRC 2007-002838. 5. Approval of CUP DRC 2007-002838 was previously found to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 1 Exemption) because it involved no expansion of an existing structure and facilities. Revocation of CUP DRC2007-02838 is also exempt under Section 15321 (Class 21 Exemption) as an enforcement action to revoke a permit, and Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption) as a minor alteration to the land use limitations governing the subject property. P-102 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2007-00283R-LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 5 6. The action of the City Council regarding the revocation is effective upon adoption of this resolution. 7. Notice is hereby given that the time within which to seek judicial review of the City Council's decision is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Government Code. 8. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of the Resolution and transmit a copy of the same via certified mail, return-receipt requested, to the business owners at the names and addresses found in City records. P-103 5 P-104 RESOLUTION NO. 10-DSI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REVOCATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2007-00284R FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE MASI PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, SUBAREA 7, LOCATED AT 11815 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-011-38 A. Recitals 1. On March 10, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga revoked Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R for EI Loco Cantina & Grill, an existing restaurant within the Masi Plaza Shopping Center at 11815 Foothill Boulevard ("the subject business") pursuant to Section 5.12.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which authorizes the suspension or revocation of an entertainment permit if it is found that the permittee or any persons acting under the authority to the permit has violated any conditions of approval or conducted a permitted business in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public. 2. On March 18, 2010, the owners of the business submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. 3. On May 19, 2010, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and concluded the hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have been met. B. Resolution The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows. 1. All facts stated in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based on substantial evidence presented during the May 19, 2010 public hearing on the appeal, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, the City Council finds as follows: a. On December 12, 2000, the City approved CUP 00-44 for the subject business to allow the sale of and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages (Type 47 liquor license) at a restaurant called Felipe's Mexican Restaurant occupying a lease space of approximately 2,800 square feet and an outdoor dining area of approximately 600 square feet. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2007-00284R -LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 2 b. On July 25, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R to allow live entertainment and dancing at the subject business. Among the conditions of approval was a requirement for an amendment to the entertainment permit prior to any modification to the approved floor plan, an expansion of the bar area, or reduction in the seating area. Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R was approved in conjunction with approval of CUP DRC2007-00283R, which superseded CUP 00-44, amended the permitted business hours, allowed for nightly entertainment seven days per week from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., approved a new floor plan that limited the entertainment area to 150 square feet, required an amendment to the CUP approval prior to any modification to the approved floor plan, an expansion of the bar area, or reduction in the seating area. c. Subsequently, the restaurant was sold to a new owner and renamed EI Loco Cantina Bar & Grill, and the floor plan was altered by the replacement of dining tables with bar-style tables, an expansion of the dance floor beyond the permitted 150 square feet, and the installation of nightclub-style lighting. These alterations occurred without prior City approval or modification of Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R or CUP DRC2007-00283R. d. On July 9, 2008, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to review the operation of CUP DRC2007-00283R and Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R and determine whether the operation of the business was consistent with its conditions of approval, detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare, or injurious to properties in the vicinity. After the close of that hearing the Planning Commission voted to institute a 90-day review period to allow the business to bring the operation into compliance with its conditions of approval. e. On December 10, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted its 90- day review of the business at a duly noticed public hearing, and subsequently voted to modify the conditions of approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R and CUP DRC2001-00283R and called for a another review of the business after 6 months. Among the modified conditions was a requirement that the business provide uniformed, licensed private security during the approved evening hours of entertainment. f. On September 9, 2009, City staff presented a report to the Planning Commission regarding the operation of the business and informed the Commission that the business was in compliance with its conditions of approval at that time. g. On September 15, 2009, the subject business cancelled its private security service. h. On December 9, 2009, City staff presented the Planning Commission with a request from the Police Department for the Commission to initiate a review of the subject business due to the level of calls for police service at the subject P-105 2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2007-00284R -LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 3 business. The Planning Commission granted the request and set the public hearing on the matter for January 13, 2010. i. On December 18, 2009, the subject business entered into a contract with Barry's Security, Inc. to provide one security guard on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 2:00 a.m. This leaves several days and times during which the business has no security during entertainment hours. j. On January 13, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to February 10, 2010 at the request of City staff. k. On February 10, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing to February 24, 2010 at the request of the attorney for the subject business. I. On February 24, 2010, the Planning Commission continued the public hearing again at the request of the attorney for the subject business, who complained of inadequate time to review the staff report. The Planning Commission continued the hearing until March 10, 2010. m. On March 10, 2010, the Planning Commission reopened the continued public hearing and concluded it on that date. During the hearing City staff and the members of the Police Department presented evidence that the business was not in compliance with its conditions of approval due to cancellation of the security guard contract for approximately 3 months following the September 9, 2009 Planning Commission review and the occurrence of large numbers of persons dancing outside the 150 square foot entertainment area. Evidence was also presented that the conduct of the business was contrary to the peace, health, safety of the public due to the number and severity of police calls for service emanating from or connected to the business. n. At the March 10, 2010 Planning Commission public hearing, The subject business was represented by an attorney who complained that the business was given inadequate due process due to the presentation of hearsay evidence and the lack of an opportunity to cross-examine City staff and members of the Police Department. The Chair of the Planning Commission offered the business's attorney the opportunity to address any questions he had of staff and the Police Department to the Chair, but the attorney declined. o. After the close of the March 10, 2010 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to revoke Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R. P-106 3 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2007-00284R -LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 4 p. At the May 19, 2010 public hearing before the City Council, City staff and the Police Department presented substantially the same evidence and arguments as they presented to the Planning Commission; as did the attorney for the subject business 3. The totality of evidence presented at the May 19, 2010 public hearing, including the facts set forth in Section 2 of this Resolution support the following conclusions and determinations; a. The subject business has been given adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard regarding the potential revocation of Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R. The Planning Commission held multiple hearings, granted several continuances to the subject business. The business was represented by counsel the entire time before the Planning Commission and the City Council and the business was given repeated opportunities to offer evidence and rebut evidence presented against it. Complaints regarding the introduction of hearsay evidence and the lack of opportunity to cross-examine witnesses are without merit because the formal rules of evidence do not apply during the City's administrative hearings and the attorney for the business declined the opportunity offered to present his questions of staff to the Planning Commission Chair and Mayor. b. The subject business has violated the conditions of approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R through the cancellation of its security guard contract fora 3-month period, the inadequate security staffing since that time, expansion of entertainment outside the 150 square foot permitted area and because the entertainment is not being conducted as an accessory to a restaurant use. Rather, the subject business is operating as a de facto nightclub without the proper City approvals or the required Type 48 liquor license. c. The subject business is being conducted in a manner detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare due to violations of its conditions of approval and as evidenced by the number and severity of police calls for service emanating from or associated with the business. 4. Based on the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 2 and 3 of this Resolution, the City Council hereby denies the appeal and upholds the Planning Commission's action, and revokes Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R. 5. Approval of Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R was previously found to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 1 Exemption) because it involved no expansion of an existing structure and facilities. Revocation of Entertainment Permit DRC2007-00284R is also exempt under Section 15321 (Class 21 Exemption) as an enforcement action to revoke a permit. P-7 07 4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO DRC2007-00284R -LOCO CANTINA June 2, 2010 Page 5 6. The action of the City Council regarding the revocation is effective upon adoption of this resolution. 7. Notice is hereby given that the time within which to seek judicial review of the City Council's decision is governed by Section 1094.6 of the Government Code. 8. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of the Resolution and transmit a copy of the same via certified mail, return-receipt requested, to the business owners at the names and addresses found in City records. P-108 5 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPdRTME14T Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engine Shelley Hayes, Assistant Enginee ~u P-109 ~r RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 728181 P, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $993,284.00, FOR THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 08-093 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 728181 P, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $993,284.00, for the Pacific Electric Trail Phase V Improvements, Contract No. 08-093. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: Grand Pac"rfic Contractors, inc. 680 N. Cota Street Corona, CA 92880 Respectfully submitted, r uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is Attachment P-110 PR.O.rECT ~icini~y Map Pacific Electric It7land Empire Trail P17ase east of Eti«~anda Ave. to i-15 Free~~~av STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DF,PARTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer ~ ~{ P-111 _.. ~ , RANCxo CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND NO. 786029P, RETAINED IN LIEU OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $239,980.00, FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM AT 23 LOCATIONS PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 08-052 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond No. 786029P, retained in lieu of Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $239,980.00, for the Traffic Signal Interconnection System at 23 Locations project, Contract No. 08-052. BACKGROUNDlANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: V T Electric Inc. 869 W. 9"' Street Upland, CA 91786 Respectfully submitted, ~r i~''~~ Mark er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD/SH:Is Attachment SAN7INA ! 7 1 1 f 1, A~.. ~ r..l. ~1`- _ ,`„ ~J ` . ~.; if ~ 1 ._~ ~ 0 G U~~:i \. Y ~1.E I ~ ' ~ MILL IU - ,_ --~ ~.~ _. " -`; ~ - / I F , r I ~ _ i . HI _. SIDE r_'.. _i ~ , ,,.; ju3 I I ~ ~ .t_;.~1 WILSON C ;W1L'Bt ,; . _ ; ( 1~ , ~ 3LI r ~r~: {UN-~ - .iTJ_f ~} ~ 'r xc _` y '' C ~ ~ ii 1 PCB' y l4 ~ %£ ~E rLi .. , f - ~ j ~ _ , . . ~ _- - 120 -,~ L i .., ~ _~L1 , ~ . y - ,- 'I '; H -1 - HA LINP'I ~~. `'~a.1 'i~ ::; A~IP.SP~. NF.I '- _r' ~_~.,, f',Ia~? sfrH $~ _~I_G_ 7THm - ~ - .Z ~+{ I ,T a ~ I~ ~TH ~ I i7W=v ~ ,w I T 1 ' I i ~ 6iH -' Lf F - I- ~ -Y. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ® Synchronized Intersection I i ~__ .,,~ ~ 4TH _ 7rtA z I °""M° ~~° " ~ CI'TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a r Y ~ w VICINITY MAP .'m, s ~ STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPAR'T'MENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From:' Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician P-113 '~~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 16311, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AND SIXTH STREET, SUBMITTED BY CRESTWOOD COPORATION It is recommended that City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond, for Tract 16311, located on the southeast corner of Hellman and Sixth Street, submitted by Crestwood Corporation. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER Crestwood Corporation 510 W. Citrus Edge Street Glendora. CA 91740 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond #730334S Respectfully submitted, ~~ M r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrvv $96, 810.00 Attachment(s) CITY OF ITEM: TiPi~CT /~'~ ~/~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:.1/1~T~''/Vli4E ~4 i P-115 STAFF REPORT_~ Pt.arvING DEP~IRT.'viENT RANCHO cUCAMONGA Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP; Planning Director By: Thomas Gratin, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE - DRC2010-00261 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, a Federally required document for the receipt of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, which provides an overview of the laws, regulations, or other obstacles that may affect accessibility to housing. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, take public testimony regarding the Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice, and adopt the AI thereby authorizing the staff to submit the report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for their consideration. BACKGROUND: As a condition to receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding, HUD requires the City to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing as required by the Code of Federal Regulations. This certification specifically requires the City "to assume the responsibility of fair housing planning by conducting an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within its jurisdiction, taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintaining records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard." 24 C.F.R. § 570.601(a)(2) (2009) In response to requests for assistance, HUD developed the Fair Housing Planning Guide to assist in fair housing planning and in fulfilling the fair housing requirements of the Consolidated Plan and CDBG regulations. The Guide provides information on how to conduct an AI, undertake activities to overcome ident~ed impediments, and maintain documentary records. The Guide defines the AI as a comprehensive review of the City's laws, regulations and administrative policies, procedures, and practices. The AI involves an assessment on how these laws, regulations, policies, and procedures affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing, and how conditions, both public and private, affect fair housing choice. Previous editions of the AI were approved by the City Council in 1991, 1996, and 2002. ANALYSIS: The City contracted with The Planning Center, Inc. for the preparation of a comprehensive update to the City's AI. The scope of the analysis and format used in preparation of the AI adheres to the recommendations contained in the Guide. The AI is structured into five sections and includes the Introduction, Community Profile, Public Policies, Fair Housing Status, and Fair Housing Plan. P-116 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2010-00261- CDBG ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE June 2, 2010 Page 2 • Chapter 1 -Introduction. This chapter defines fair housing, provides an overview of relevant laws affecting fair housing in the community, summarizes public participation, and explains the purpose of the report. • Chapter 2 -Community Profile. This chapter presents population, housing, economic, and special needs characteristics in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This chapter also provides a broad overview and understanding of the community so that the housing needs are clearly defined. • Chapter 3 -Public Policies. This chapter analyzes a range of public activities that may impede fair housing choice, including governmental land use, development regulations, and community development activities. Potential impediments to fair housing choice are discussed. • Chapter 4 -Fair Housing Status. This chapter identifies trends in the disposition of home loans in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, fair housing complaints, testing results, possible barriers to fair housing choice, and public comments received from the City's outreach efforts. • Chapter 5 -Fair Housing Plan. This chapter summarizes recommendations to further fair housing opportunity in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. These actions are specific with implementing timeframes. The report concludes with a signature page and statement certifying the City of Rancho Cucamonga's official conclusions regarding impediments to fair housing choice and the actions necessary to address impediments. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper on May 3, 2010. Notice of the public hearing included notice of a 30-day public review period. The public review period terminates with the City Council action. As of the writing of this report, no comments regarding the AI have been received. Respectfully submitted, R . ~n~v Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:TGige Attachments: Exhibit A -Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, June 2010 Draft Resolution of Approval DRC2010-00261 P-117 RESOLUTION NO. f O'-~ $~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE DRC2010-00261, A FEDERALLY REQUIRED DOCUMENT FOR THE RECEIPTOF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNDS, WHICH PROVIDES AN OVERVIEW OF THE LAWS, REGULATIONS, OR OTHER OBSTACLES THAT MAY AFFECT ACCESSIBILITY TO HOUSING; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga prepared an Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice as described in the title of this Resolution. 2. On the 2nd day of June 2010, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the AI and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 2, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. As a condition to receiving Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)funding, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing as required by the Code of Federal Regulations (24 C.F.R. § 570.601(a)(2) {2009}); and b. This certification specifically requires the City "to assume the responsibility of fair housing planning by conducting an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within its jurisdiction, taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and maintaining records reflecting the analysis and actions in this regard"; and c. The City has prepared an AI that provides: 1) a comprehensive review of the City's laws, regulations, administrative policies, procedures, and practices; 2) an assessment of how those Taws affect location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and 3) an assessment of conditions affecting fair housing choice in both the public and private sector. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The AI is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan, Development Code, and Consolidated Plan; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. DRC2010-00261 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 2, 2010 Page 2 b. The City certifies that it will affirmatively further fair housing as required by the Code of Federal Regulations (24 C.F.R. § 570.601(a)(2) (2009)); and c. This City assumed the responsibility of fair housing planning by conducting an analysis to identify impediments to fair housing choice within its jurisdiction, will take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified through that analysis, and will maintain records reflecting the analysis. P-118 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby approves the AI and authorizes the staff to submit the report to HUD for their consideration. P-120 City of Rancho Cucamonga Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice jZANCxo GUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909.477.2700 ^PI_ANNING ~~VCENTER 1580 Metro Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 714.966.9220 P-121 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................1 A. Background to Fair Housing ....................................................... .. 1 B. Scope and Organization of Report ............................................. .. 4 C. Public Participation ...................................................................... .. S 2. Community Profile ...................................................... ..7 A. Demographic Profile .................................................................... .. 7 B. Household Characteristics ........................................................... 12 C. Housing Profile ............................................................................. 19 3. Public Policies .............................................................. 27 A. General Plan Land Use Policy ..................................................... 27 B. Development Policy ..................................................................... 35 C. Housing and Neighborhood Policy ............................................ 42 D. Local Government Services ......................................................... 49 4. Fair Housing Status ......................................................58 A. Homeownership Market .............................................................. 58 B. Rental Housing Market ................................................................ 64 C. Hate Crimes and Harassment ..................................................... 70 D. Program Evaluation ...................................................................... 73 5. Fair Housing Plan ........................................................ 75 A. Summary ........................................................................................ 75 B. Housing Plan ................................................................................. 77 C. Signature Page ............................................................................... 82 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-122 RANCHO cUCAMONGA Figures Figure 2-1 Population Growth in Rancho Cucamonga ................. .....7 Figure 2-2 Concentrations of Race and Ethnic Populations......... ...10 Figure 2-3 Low-Moderate Income Household Concentrations... ...16 Figure 2-4 Affordable Housing and Low and Moderate Income Concentration .................................................... ...24 Figure 3-1 Dispersion of Residential Care Facilities ...................... ...33 Figure 3-2 Transit Accessibility to Employment Centers .............. ...53 Figure 3-3 Transit Accessibility to Residential Neighborhoods ... ...54 Figure 3-4 Target Reinvestment Areas ............................................. ...56 Figure 4-1 Trends in Home Loans, 2003-2008 ............................... ...61 Figure 4-2 Process for Resolving a Fair Housing Complaint........ ...68 Figure 4-3 Proportion of Students Harassed at Local Schools...... ...72 Tables Table 2-1 Age Characteristics and Trends ..................................... .....8 Table 2-2 Racial and Ethnicity Trends ........................................... .....9 'Cable 2-3 Measures of Integration .................................................. ...11 Table 2-4 Household Characteristics and Trends ......................... ...12 Table 2-6 Resident Occupations and Incomes .............................. ...13 Table 2-6 Household Income by Tenure ........................................ ...14 Table 2-7 Household Income Patterns ........................................... ...15 Table 2-8 Housing Trends, 2000-2008 ........................................... ...19 Table 2-9 Housing Tenure Trends .................................................. ...20 Table 2-10 Condition of the Housing Stock .................................... ...21 Table 2-11 Home Sales Prices in Rancho Cucamonga ................... ...22 Table 2-12 Apartment Rents in Rancho Cucamonga ..................... ...22 Table 2-13 Assisted Multiple-Family Projects ................................. ...23 Tablet-14 Housing Affordability ..................................................... ...25 Table 2-15 Housing Problems ........................................................... ...26 Table 3-1 Residential General Plan Designations ......................... ...27 Table 3-2 Specific Plans and Planned Community Zoning......... ...28 Table 3-3 Housing Permitted in Residential Zones ...................... ...29 Table 3-4 Residential Development Standards .............................. ...36 Table 3-S Residential Parking Standards ........................................ ...37 Table 3-6 Strategy to Address the RHNA ...................................... ...44 Table 3-7 Redevelopment Housing Production Requirements .. ...47 Table 4-1 Home Loan Patterns by Tract ........................................ ...62 Table 4-2 Home Loan Patterns by Applicant ................................ ...63 Table 4-3 Fair Housing Complaints, 2000-2008 ........................... ...66 Table 4-4 Percentage of Students Harassed ................................... ...72 ii 2010.2075 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-7 23 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 1. Introduction Equal access to housing of one's choice is fundamental to each person in meeting their essential needs and pursuing personal, educational, employment, or other goals. Recognizing this fundamental right, the federal government and State of California have established fair housing as a protected right. This section provides the legal statutes governing fair housing and the concept of impediments, and the coverage of this study. A. Background to Fair Housing Forty years ago, Congress passed the Fair Housing Act. This landmark legislation prohibits discrimination in public and private housing markets that is based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, or familial status. One of the basic principles in the Fair Housing Act and the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 is that cities must take steps [o advance fair housing, not just to avoid discriminating. Fair housing is about much more than avoiding discriminatory practices and legal action. We all have friends, family members, coworkers, and acquaintances who ask these questions at some point in their lives: • Can I find decent rental housing for my family and children even though I have a housing choice voucher? . Will our aging parents be able to use public transit to access medical facilities and supportive services? . Will our children feel safe at school and be treated fairly regardless of disability, race, or religious belief? • Will I be treated fairly in securing a home loan and not be subject to questionable loans? • Can I feel safe in my neighborhood from gangs, hate crimes, and other discriminatory behaviors? • Can I find an accessible home or add a ramp to lead up to the front door that will allow my parents to visit or stay at home with us? These questions deal with real life issues that are fair housing concerns. When considered from this perspective, fair housing is concerned with how to create an inclusive community for all residents, where no group is privileged above any other, where everyone has equal opportunity to meet their needs, and where everyone is safe and secure at home, work, or school. Goal of Fair Housing The goal of the fair housing movement is to support and promote inclusive, diverse communities of choice: communities and neighborhoods where families choose to live; where housing and schools are stable and well supported; where employment is accessible; and where all racial and ethnic groups and persons with disabilities are an integral part of the larger community. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-124 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 1. FAIR HOUSING LAW The modern fair housing movement is rooted in a series of laws enacted over the past forty years by the federal government and state of California. These laws have been supplemented or interpreted through a number of court decisions over the yeazs. These laws are briefly summarized below. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 This law and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 are the primary federal laws that prohibit discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, or negotiation for property on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Whereas the Civil Rights Act contained provisions protecting people from housing discrimination, amendments later extended protection to families with children and disabled people. The Fair Housing Act also addresses requirements to accommodate disabled people. Civil Rights Acts of 1959 The Stale of California has enacted additional statutes that mirror and, in certain cases, extend fair housing protections in federal law. The Unruh Civil Rights Act of 1959 and subsequent court decisions require equal access to the accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services of all business establishments regardless ofprotected status. The courts interpret this Act to prohibit any arbitrary discrimination based in any class distinction, regardless of whether or not that basis is enumerated in the Act. The Fair Employment and Housing Act of 1963 This statute prohibits discrimination in the sale, rental, lease, negotiation, or financing of housing based on race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, and ancestry. The California Fair Housing Act of 1992 brought state laws into conformity with the Federal Fair Housing Act, added protections for people with "mental and physical disabilities" and "familial status;' and required housing providers to allow for reasonable accommodations. State law was also recenfly changed to add protections for source of income. The Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976 This statute provides that all persons have the right to be free from any violence, or intimidation by threat of violence, committed against their persons or property because of their race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, sexual orientation, sex, age, disability, or position in a labor dispute. The Banes Civil Rights Act adds additional protections and forbids interference by force or threat with an individual's legal rights in places of worship, housing, and private property. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-125 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. DEFINING FAIR HOUSING AND IMPEDIMENTS The concept of "fair housing" and its practical application to local governments and the housing market has changed over time in response to state and federal laws, court decisions, and public opinion. In light of fair housing legislation passed at the federal and state levels, as well as consultation with HUD and professionals providing fair housing services, the following definition of fair housing is used for this report: Fair housing is a condition in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market having a like range of housing choice available to them regardless of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor. Within the legal framework of federal and state laws and based on the guidance provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Fair Housing Planning Guide, impediments to fair housing choice can be defined as: Any actions, omissions, ordecisions taken because ofage, race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation, or any other arbitrary factor which restrict housing choices or the availability of housing choices; or Any actions, omissions, or decisions which have the effect of restricting housing choices or the availability of housing choices on the basis ofage, race, color, ancestry, national origin, religion, sex, disability, marital status, familial status, source of income, sexual orientation or other arbitrary factor. To affirmatively promote equal housing opportunity, a community must proactively work to remove or mitigate impediments to fair housing choice. Furthermore, in order to be eligible for certain federal funds (such as those under HUD's Community Planning and Development formula grants), a jurisdiction must: 1) certify its commitment to actively further fair housing choice; 2) maintain fair housing records; and 3) conduct an analysis of impediments to fair housing and report on its progress annually. Rancho Cucamonga is dedicated [o providing fair housing opportunities to residents and ensuring compliance with applicable laws. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-126 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA B. Scope and Organization of Report Federal law requires jurisdictions that receive federal funds for community development activities to assess, on a periodic basis, the status of fair housing in [heir community. As a recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is required to update its Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, last updated in 2002, and report on the findings and progress in furthering fair housing opportunity in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. The purpose of this report, Analysis of Impediments [o Fair Housing (AI), is to identify actual and potential impediments to fair and equal housing opportunities within Rancho Cucamonga. This AI provides an overview of the laws, regulations, conditions, or other possible obstacles that may affect access to housing and other public services and facilities in Rancho Cucamonga. The scope, analysis, and format used in this report adhere to recommendations ofthe Fair Housing Plann ing Guide published by HUD. The Rancho Cucamonga AI contains five chapters: • Chapter I-Introduction. This chapter defines fair housing, provides an overview of relevant laws affecting fair housing in the community, summarizes public participation, and explains the purpose of this report. • Chapter 2-Community Profile. This chapter presents population, housing, economic, and special needs characteristics in Rancho Cucamonga. This chapter provides a broad overview and understanding of the community so [hat housing needs are clearly defined. • Chapter 3-Public Policies. This chapter analyzes a range of public activities that may impede fair housing choice, including governmental land use, development regulations, and community development activities. Potential impediments to fair housing choice are discussed. . Chapter 4-Fair Housing Status. This chapter identifies trends in the disposition of home loans in Rancho Cucamonga, fair housing complaints, testing results, possible barriers to fair housing choice, and public comments received from the City's outreach efforts. • Chapter 5-Fair Housing Plan. This chapter summarizes recommendations to Curther fair housing opportunity in Rancho Cucamonga. These actions are specific, with implementing timeframes. This report concludes with a signature page and statement certifying the City of Rancho Cucamonga's official conclusions regarding impediments to fair housing choice and the actions necessary to address impediments. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-127 RANCHO CUCAMONGA C. Public Participation The City values citizen input on how well city government serves its residents. The City Council relies on its Planning Commission, advisory commissions, and boards to provide advice and recommendations in areas of City services. The public participation effort for the 2010 AI adhered to the City's Citizen Participation Plan for the Consolidated Plan and consisted of public hearings before the City Council as described below. The City published a notice in the local newspaper that stated on June 2, 2010, the City Council will consider the City's update to the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (the "AI"). The AI provides an overview of laws, regulations, or other obstacles that may affect accessibility to housing in Rancho Cucamonga. The AI involves: . A comprehensive review of Rancho Cucamonga's laws, regulations, and administrative policies, procedures, and practices; . An assessment of how those laws affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing; and . An assessment of conditions, both public and private, that affects fair housing choice. The AI was made available fora 30-day public review period beginning on Monday, May 3, 2010, and ending on Wednesday, June 2, 2010. Copies of the AI were available at the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Comments received will be incorporated into the final AI 2010-2015 Anatysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-128 jZANCHo C,UCAMONGA This page intentionally left blank. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-129 RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA 2. Community Profile To provide a context for evaluating fair housing opportunity, this chapter provides an overview of Rancho Cucamonga and discusses a variety of demographic, economic, housing, and special needs characteristics and trends to identify issues that may raise fair housing concerns in the city. A. Demographic Profile 1. POPULATION TRENDS Incorporated in 1977, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed through the merger of three formerly unincorporated communities-Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda. Population growth trends in Rancho Cucamonga showed a steep population increase during the 1980s (84 percent) following incorporation. During the 1990s and early 2000s, the City's population increased by an equally high number due to the development of master planned communities and infill projects. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to experience significant population growth. According to the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG), the City's population will increase to 172,409 by 2010 as shown in Figure 2-1. According to the 2010 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, the City projects a buildout of 203,800 residents in 2030. 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 Figure 2-1 Population Growth in Rancho Cucamonga 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Chace 1980 1990 2000 2010 P-130 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Age and Fair Housing Age is a protected class under fair housing law. Persons may encounter discrimination when selecting housing if a property owner or manager makes decisions based on the age of the applicant. For example, a property manager may limit the number of children or prohibit children, prefer working-age single adults (rather than college age adults), or discourage seniors that may have disabilities. Housing providers are within their rights to establish reasonable occupancy limits and rules for tenants, but those rules cannot be based on the age of the resident. 2. AGE CHARACTERISTICS Housing needs are related to residents' age. Traditionally, young adults prefer apartments, condominiums, and smaller single-family units that are affordable, while middle-aged adults prefer larger homes that can accommodate children. Seniors often prefer smaller condominiums and single-family units that are more affordable and have relatively fewer maintenance needs. These age characteristics can help provide insight into current and Cuture housing needs. Summarized below in Table 2-t, the City of Rancho Cucamonga can be characterized as a predominantly family-oriented community with a large number of younger and middle-aged households with children. The median age of residents is approximately 32 years, which is slightly higher than the County median age of 30 years. During the 2000-2007 timeframe, young adults (18-34), middle-age adults (45-54 years) and seniors (65 years+) increased the fastest in terms of percentage growth. Table 2.1 Age Characteristics and Trends 2000 2007 Change Age Group No. of Persons Percent of Total No. of Persons Percent of Total Number 2000-07 <5 8,779 7% 10,684 7% 22% 5-17 29,428 23% 32,485 20% 10% 18-24 12,657 10% 17,882 11% 41% 25-34 18,115 14% 25,669 16% 42% 35-44 24,872 19% 24,960 16% 0% 45-54 18,628 15% 24,819 15% 33% 55--64 7,890 6% 13,299 8% 69% 65+ 7,792 6% 10,551 7% 35% Total 128,161 100 160,349 100 25% Source: 2000 Census; 2006-2008 ACS. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's age profile indicates a continued strong demand for single-family and detached units that offer opportunities for homeownership. Moreover, much of the City's residential development capacity is for single-family homes. However, with the large proportion of working adults ages 45-64 (including seniors), some may eventually seek to downsize to attached ormultiple-family housing. In particular, the largest increase in population was adults nearing retirement age. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-131 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3. RACIAL AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION Southern California has a diverse, multicultural population. Like many communities within southern California, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is gradually becoming more racially and ethnically diverse. Between 2000 and 2007, the City's demographic makeup shifted from a white majority to a plurality, with no particular group comprising above SO percent of the population. These changes have implications for furthering fair housing. Shown in Table 2-2, Rancho Cucamonga's Asian population increased the fastest, doubling in number and increasing to 10 percent of the City's population in 2007. Meanwhile, the number of African Americans and Hispanics also increased in number by more than 40 percent. Whites still increased in number, but declined as a percentage oftotal population. These trends are expected to continue into the foreseeable future. Table 2-2 Racial and Ethnicity Trends 2000 2007 Change in Race and Ethnicity No. of Persons Percent of Total No. of Persons Percent of TOtal Number 2000-07 White 69,400 54% 73,820 46% 6% Hispanic 35,558 28% 52,146 33% 43% Asian 7,309 7% 15,298 10% 109% Black 9,674 6% 13,814 9% 47% Other 6,220 5% 5,341 3% -14% Total 128,161 100% 160,479 100% 25% Source: 2000 Census; 2000x2006 ACS. Fair housing concerns tend to occur more often when one or more race and ethnic groups are separated from one another in different neighborhoods. A high concentration occurs when the proportion of one race and ethnic group in a census block group in Rancho Cucamonga is 50 percent higher than that group's representation in San Bernardino County's population. A very high concentration occurs when the percentage ofthat race and ethnic group is at least double its representation in San Bernazdino County. As shown on the following page in Figure 2-2, Hispanic residents are highly concentrated within southwestern Rancho Cucamonga. High concentrations of Asian and Pacific Islander residents aze also located in the northern and southwest portions of Rancho Cucamonga. African American or Black residents are concentrated in northeastern Rancho Cucamonga and in an industrial and commercial area southeast of Interstate 15. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 9 P-132 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA ~, L~ 009200 1. ~ Hgbld~ _ 002003 002002 yY^pn $ c .yF ~ E d - 002009 ~ t ^ ~n _ ~ - 191h -- Upland ~w~Ne 7 002 2006 00 ~ Fontana 000812 v a o w _~ _ Arrow _ _ 002100 _ ... ~ _ Malrolink _.____ _~.. ____ - -' -"-' - ~- ___002203-.-_~__ -I 001304 v r i _ ~ .. t ' ~ 4th $ San Bemerdino ~ Ontario Q Census Tract AsianlPacific Islander ui~h r ro.,lnsn., ~ Very High Concentration Black or African American High Concentration i~ Very High Concentration Hispanic or Latino High Concentration _ Very High Concentration Figure 2-2 Concentrations of Race and Ethnic Populations 10 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-133 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 4. RESIDENTIAL RACIAL AND ETHNIC INTEGRATION Separation ofrace/ethnic groups has historicallybeen linked to segregation. However, people choose to live in different areas for a wide variety of reasons-the quality of local schools, housing prices, access to transportation, and affiliation with those of similar backgrounds. Reflecting the complexity of people's choice of where to live, the following statistical tests have been used to measure integration within a community. . Dissimilarity Index-this index represents the percentage of one group that would have to move into a new neighborhood to achieve perfect integration with another group. An index score ranges from 0-100. A value of 60 (or above) is considered very high where two groups live predominantly in different areas, values of 40 or 50 are considered moderate, and values of 30 or below are low. • Isolation Index-this index represents the percentage of same-group population in the neighborhood where the average member of a racial/ethnic group lives. An index score can range in value from 0, meaning that group is dispersed and has vast exposure to other groups, to 100, which indicates that the group is entirely isolated from other groups. Based on this index, only Whites are isolated. . Linguistic Isolation-Even if different race and ethnic groups live nearby, people may be linguistically isolated if they are unable to read or speak English well. According to the census, of the 19 percent of households who speak Spanish at home, 6 percent do not speak English very well or not at all. Of the 6% of households who speak Asian languages at home, 25 percent do not have a command of the English language. Table 2-3 summarizes the measures of integration in Rancho Cucamonga. Overall, although there are pockets of concentrations and indications of linguistic isolation mentioned above, the City's population is generally well integrated and live in close proximity to one another in the community. Table 2-3 Measures of Integration Race/Ethnic Disslmllarity Index Isolation Groups White Black Hispanic Asian Index White N/A 21.8 18.3 20.4 57.2 Black 21.8 N/A 9.0 16.7 9.8 Hispanic 18.3 9.0 N/A 2t.1 30.8 Asian 20.4 16.7 21.1 N/A 8.2 Source: Lewis Mumford Center, 2000. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 11 P-134 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Families and Fair Housing Familial status is a protected class under fair housing law. It is illegal for a landlord to refuse to rent to a single parent or family with children. Typical reasons that have been determined discriminatory include: 1) refusing to rent to single parents with children (perhaps due to fear of financial solvency) 2) refusing to rent to single males (for fear of the unit becoming a bachelor pad); 3) not allowing children to play outside or requiring families to live in certain parts of the complex; or 4) making rules that have a disproportionate impact on one or more groups of households. B. Household Characteristics Household characteristics influence housing needs in Rancho Cucamonga. For example, families with young children typically seek the living space and the financial investment that single-family homeownership has to offer. In contrast, single-person households tend to desire apartments, condominiums, and townhomes that are generally easier to maintain. This section analyzes these characteristics to better understand housing needs. 1. HOUSEHOLD TYPE Shown in Table 2-4, the number of households in Rancho Cucamonga increased from 41,067 in 2000 to 52,121 in 2007, a 27 percent increase. Family households with children continue to account for the highest percentage of households in the community. However, in recent years, the number of single persons and all other households (unrelated individuals sharing housing) have increased the greatest in percentage growth. Despite the increase in the number of households, the average size of households in Rancho Cucamonga has remained at about three persons. The increase in small and large families was offset by the numeric increase in single persons; therefore, the average size of households remained the same. This pattern is typical of a mature community and should continue. Table 2-4 summarizes changes in Rancho Cucamonga's household types. Table 2-4 Household Characteristics and Trends 2000 2007 percent Household Type No. of Hhlds Percent of Total No. of Hhlds Percent of Total Change 2000-08 Married w/Children 14,240 35% 14,931 29% 5% Married w/o Children 10,513 26% 13,693 26% 30% Other Families 7,518 18% 9,278 18% 23% Single Persons 6,904 17% 11,325 22% 64% All Others 1,892 5% 2,894 6% 53% Total 41,067 100 52,727 100% 27% Household Size Single Persons 6,904 17% 11,325 22% 64% Small Families 27,311 67% 33,630 65% 23% Large Families 6,852 17% 7,166 14% 5% Source: 2000 Census; 2006-2008 ACS. 12 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-135 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 2. OCCUPATIONS HELD BY RESIDENTS The City of Rancho Cucamonga is one ofthe more affluent communities in San Bernardino County. City residents have historically had a lower unemployment rate and higher median wage than in the County as a whole. With the change in the economy in recent years, the unemployment rate has increased to 9.5 percent as of 2010. The City's unemployment rate is much less than the unemployment rate of 14.4 percent in San Bernardino County. Table 2-5 shows the occupations held by Rancho Cucamonga residents and associated median wages for full-time employees. According to the 2006- 2008 American Community Survey (ACS), three general occupational classifications make up nearly three quarters of the workforce. The most common full-time occupations are sales/office (median wage of $43,000), management (median wage of $72,000), and professional occupations (median wage of $64,000). Table 2-5 Resident Occupations and Incomes Median Full-Time Percent of Full Time Occupation Type Jobs Workforce Wage Management, business, 10 978 20.5% $72,252 financial occupations , Professional and related 11 098 20.7% $64,494 occupations Sales and offce-related 15,928 29.7% $42,890 occupations Various service related 5,776 10.8% $42,409 occupations Production, transportation, and 5,009 9.3% $42,257 material moving Construction, extraction, q 764 8.9% $48,453 maintenance, and repair Farming, fishing, and forestry 67 0.1% $30,563 occupations Total Employment 53,620 100% $51,998 Source: 200('x2006 ACS. Compared to other communities in the County of San Bernardino, a larger percentage of Rancho Cucamonga residents hold management and professional occupations than residents in most communities and the county. The higher wages obviously translate into a greater ability to afford the newer and more expensive homes that are being built in the community. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 13 P-7 36 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 3. HOUSEHOLD INCOME Compared to communities throughout San Bernardino County, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is a relatively affluent community.In 2008, the median family income (MFI) for its households was $76,979, which is one of the highest incomes of all communities in San Bernardino. This is due in part to the development of highly amenitized master planned communities that have attracted a more wealthy population over the years. For housing and community development planning purposes, the federal government has established various household income categories to evaluate housing need. The income thresholds for each category are based on the median area income for communities in San Bernardino County of $64,500 for afoot-person household as of 2009. This translates into the following income thresholds for afoot-person household. • Very Low: earning below 30 percent or $20,000 • Low: earning 31 to 50 percent of MFI or $33,300 • Moderate: earning 51 to 80 percent of MFI or $53,300 • Middle: earning 81 to 120 percent of MFI or $71,000 • Above Middle: earning over 120 percent of MFI Table 2-6 shows the income distribution of Rancho Cucamonga households by federal income categories as of the 2000 Census. No reliable updates of this data are available until the 2010 Census. The household income distribution differs by tenure. The majority of homeowners in Rancho Cucamonga earn either moderate or above moderate incomes. In contrast, the majority of renters earn extremely low, very low, or lower incomes. Table 2~ Household Income by Tenure Owners Renters Total Income Group No. of hhlds % of Total No. of hhlds % of Total No. of hhlds % of Total Very Low 930 3% 1,365 11% 2,295 6% LOw 1,195 4% 1,130 9% 2,325 6% Moderate 2,245 8% 2,255 19% 4,500 11% Middle 4,575 16% 2,825 23% 7,400 18% Above 19,870 69% 4,590 38% 24,460 60% Total 28,815 100% 12,165 100% 40,980 100% Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, Census 2000. 14 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-137 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Income by Household Chazacteristics Table 2-7 analyzes patterns in household income by race/ethnic and demographic characteristic according to the 2000 Census. It should be noted that equivalent data on household income by household type is not available until the 2010 Census. Income differences are not necessarily a fair housing concern, but just a means to identify differences that, in combination with housing opportunities, may represent a concern. In 2000, the percentage of each race and ethnic group that earned very low, low, and moderate income was approximately the same. With respect to household type, Rancho Cucamonga's elderly households have a larger percentage of very low and low income residents, which is expected given retirement incomes. There are variations in income distribution among the other groups, but the variation among other groups is relatively minor. Table 2-7 Household Income Patterns Income Levels Household Very Low Low Moderate Above Characteristic <30%MFI <50%MFI <80%MFI >80%MFI Race/Ethnicity White 5% 5% 10% 80% Hispanic 7% 7% 14% 72% ASian 7% 5% 11% 76% 818ck 6% 7% 12% 75% All 6% 6% 11% 78% Type Elderly 14% 14% 20% 52% Small Families 3% 4% 9% 84% Large Families 4% 5% 11% 80% All Others 9% 6% 12% 73% Source: US Census, 2000. Concentrations of minority groups are located in lower and moderate income areas of the community. The highest concentration of low and moderate income households is in southeast Rancho Cucamonga, primarily east of Interstate 15. This concentration coincides with a very high concentration of Black residents. Other high concentrations of low and moderate income households are in the southwestern part of the City, west of Haven, which corresponds with a high concentration of Hispanic residents. Figure 2-3 illustrates these patterns in Rancho Cucamonga. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 15 P-138 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Figure 2-3 Low-Moderate Income Household Concentrations 16 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Fbusing Choice ® Concentrefon of Low and Moderete Income Hauahdda O Concentration of Non-White Minority Housholda P-139 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 4. SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSEHOLDS Certain households have a greater challenge finding suitable housing in a community or receiving fair housing treatment from housing providers due to special circumstances. These circumstances include employment or source of income, family type, disability, or other characteristic. The following discussion describes and analyzes the housing needs of seniors, people with disabilities, families, and homeless people. Senior Households The 2005-2007 ACS identified that 10,186 persons age 65 years or older lived in Rancho Cucamonga and comprised 6 percent of the population. This equals a total of 5,576 senior households or approximately 11 percent of all households. Seniors generally have a much higher prevalence of housing and supportive service needs due to their lower income level and higher rates of mobility and self-care limitations. Communities face the same challenges in meeting their needs. Housing choices for disabled seniors maybe limited due to special mobility needs, interior accessibility, access to public transportation, and access to health care. With respect to services, the City provides senior homeowners with housing assistance in the form ofhome modification and improvement programs to help ensure that seniors can safely "age in place." The City allocates public funds to subsidize senior housing and home rehabilitation. Seniors in the community can also access a range of supportive services operated out of the James L. Brulte Senior Center. Family Households Families with children have special housing needs due to generally lower per capita income, need for affordable childcare, the need for affordable housing, or the need for larger units with three or more bedrooms. Families with children, especially teenagers, may face discrimination in the rental housing market. For example, some landlords may charge lazge households a higher rent or security deposit, limit the number of children in a complex or unit, confine them to a specific location, limit the time children can play outdoors, or choose not to rent to families with children at all. In 2007, Rancho Cucamonga had 5,160 single-parent households with children, representing 10 percent oftotal households. Rancho Cucamonga is also home to 13,511 large households with five or more members, of which 62 percent own their homes. Single-parent households often live on a single income. Furthermore, their housing choices may also be influenced by access to child care, health care, and other family supportive services. Lazge households are usually families with two or more children or extended family members. Large households have greater difficulty finding large enough housing and thus may overpay or live in overcrowded conditions. 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 17 P-140 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Persons with Disabilities The Americans with Disabilities Act defines a disability as a "physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities." In 2007, the City of Rancho Cucamonga had 14,642 residents that reported a sensory, physical, mental, self-care, mobility, and/or employment disability. Although disabilities are often associated with age, 10,756 disabled residents in the City were not elderly residents. Nevertheless, the total number ofdisabled residents will likely increase with the gradual aging of baby boomers. Disabled persons ofen have special housing needs with regard to affordability, accessibility, or proximity to public transportation. Many disabled persons live on fixed incomes, thus limiting their ability to afford housing. Persons with a disability may also have limited housing choices (e.g., single-story homes or developments with elevators). Someone with a visual impairment may require a home that allows service animals. Moreover, some property managers may avoid renting to a disabled person because of the cost of modifications needed, fear ofliability and legal action if the complex is not wholly accessible, or a strict no-pets polity. Homeless People Homelessness is a pressing issue for many dries and the varied dimensions involved have implications for fair housing. People who are homeless may be chronically homeless (perhaps due to substance abuse) or situationally homeless resulting from job loss, azguments with family or friends, incarceration, or violence. In 2007, the Community Action Partnership counted 122 homeless people who resided in Rancho Cucamonga. Homeless people face critical housing needs due [o their very low incomes and the lack of appropriate types of housing. This demographic group may also encounter discriminatory housing practices when landlords refuse to rent to formerly homeless persons due to poor credit history. Property managers often require an income three times the rent and reject housing applicants with poor credit histories or records of eviction. In addition, this group often needs transitional and permanent supportive housing, a type of housing that is often in short supply in a community. To address the City's homeless special needs population, Rancho Cucamonga annually utilizes 15 percent of its federal allocation of community development block grants to provide public and supportive services to prevent homelessness and/or aid those who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. As required by federal regulations, these funds are directed to persons in need (as 51 percent of those served must be low and moderate income), especially those with special needs. 18 2010-2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-141 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA C. Housing Profile Fair housing is furthered when a range in types and prices of housing are available. Fair housing is concerned with whether people, regardless of status, are treated equally in the rental, sale, or occupancy of housing. To that end, this section provides an overview of the housing market and the dynamics that affect housing availability in Rancho Cucamonga. 1. HOUSING GROWTH AND TYPE Rancho Cucamonga has historically benefitted from significant planned growth in housing. Fueled by available land, high demand, and master plan approvals during the late 1990s and early 2000s, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has built out a number of large housing tracts in recent years. These approvals have resulted in a significant growth in the number of housing units and population added to the community. According to the Department of Finance, the majority of homes in Rancho Cucamonga are single-family detached. However, the greatest increase in housing stock since 2000 was multiple-family projects. Although some multiple-family projects include three- and four-bedroom units, the most common sizes are smaller units. Since 2006, however, housing production has declined in response to the economic recession and housing market. Looking forward, uncertainty in the financial and housing markets will continue to slow housing construction. However, according to the 2010 General Plan, the City's buildout increased 14 percent to 63,253 housing units. Much of the increase in housing units will be due to the increased acreage and density allowed in the City's new mixed-use neighborhoods. Table 2-8 compares the number and type of housing units in 2000 and 2008. Table 2-8 Housing Trends, 2000-2008 2000 2008 Change in Product Type Number of Units Percent of Units Number of Units Percent of Units Number of Units 2000-08 Single-family Detached Units 29,220 69% 35,575 65% 22°k Attached Units 2,532 6% 3,161 6% 25% Multi-family Units 9,010 18% 14,987 27% 66% Mobile Homes 1,372 3% 1,380 3% 1 Source: California Department of Finance, 2000 and 2008. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 19 P-742 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 2. TENURE AND VACANCY Housing tenure refers to the occupancy of a residence, whether it is owner or renter occupied. Generally, homeowners are older, have higher incomes, and have larger families. A community's tenure profile also influences resident mobility, with renters more likely to change residence than owners. The housing vacancy rate is a measure of the availability of adequate and affordable housing, with low vacancy rates indicating a shortage of housing and higher vacanry rates reflecting an oversupply of housing. Shown in Table 2-9, the number of housing units rented in Rancho Cucamonga has increased by 39 percent since 2000 alone. The reason for a greater increase in renter-occupied units (versus ownership) is due to the higher production of multiple-family units (e.g., senior and family apartments and condominium projects) built during recent years. Still, the number of single-family residences built is approximately twice as high as the number ofmultiple-family residences built during the same period. Vacancies are an indication of the balance between the supply of housing with residents' preferences for different types and prices of housing. A vacancy of 3-5 percent is considered optimal. Some vacancies aze needed to provide opportunities for new residents and for current residents with changing housing needs. The ACS reports that housing vacancy rates have doubled to 6 percent since 2000 and are now likely higher. Table 2-9 Housing Tenure Trends 2000 2008 percent Tenure of Units Number of Units Percent of Units Number of Units Percent of Units Change in Units Owned 28,814 70% 35,203 68% 22% Rented 12,162 30% 16,918 32% 39% Total 40,976 100% 52,121 100% 27% Vacancy 3% 6% -- Source: 2000 Census; 2006-2008 ACS. The increase in housing vacancy rates reflect, in part, the downturn in the housing market and rising foreclosures that have impacted much of southern California, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Although the housing market has more or less stabilized throughout the region, the economy has not, and unemployment is still very high. Housing prices and vacancy rates will likely remain higher than optimal until at least 2011. 20 2010-2015 Analysis of Impetliments to Fair Housing Choice P-143 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 3. HOUSING AGE AND CONDITION The City of Rancho Cucamonga is known for an exceptionally high quality of housing stock. The condition of the housing stock is a reflection of the community's values, neighborhood quality, and desire and financially capability of property owners to maintain their homes and apartments. Providing safe and attractive housing improves quality of life for residents and helps maintain the City's image for investment. As a developing community, the City has a relatively newer housing stock. The vast majority ofsingle-family homes, condominiums, and apartments were built since 1970. Housing age can be indicator of housing conditions. Housing units over 30 years old are more likely to need minor rehabilitation than newer units. Homes over 50 years of age are more likely to need substantial rehabilitation (e.g., plumbing, electrical system, or structural improvements). Fewer than 9 percent of homes were built before 1970, and these units are most likely in need of some rehabilitation. Several definitions ofwhat constitutes substandazd housing exist. Generally, substandard housing refers to housing units that lack complete kitchens, heating, or complete plumbing facilities; have lead-based paint or structural defects; or are dilapidated or boarded up.According to the 2000 Census (the latest survey available on many indicators), Rancho Cucamonga has several hundred substandard units. This number does not reflect foreclosed homes with substandard conditions that have occurred since the census. To provide more polity direction, a focused building-by-building survey of multiple-family units and a survey of select single-family neighborhoods were conducted in Rancho Cucamonga. The survey, summarized below, found that 4 percent of single-family homes and 2 percent of multiple- family units required significant rehabilitation and reinvestment. These homes are generally older and may include foreclosures as well. Table 2-10 Condition of the Housing Stock Quality Indicator Single-Family Homes Multifamily Homes Good Condition 65% 67% Minor Maintenance 18% 21% Moderate Maintenance 13% 10% Substantial Maintenance 4% 2% Total 100% 100% Source: 2006-2008 ACS 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 21 P-144 RANCHO GUCAMONGA 4. HOUSING PRICES As one of the more desirable communities in the Inland Empire, Rancho Cucamonga has higher housing prices and rents. Table 2-11 shows median sales prices by zip code for April 2008 to Apri12009 by housing type. From April 2008 to April 2009, the median home price in Rancho Cucamonga was $353,000 for asingle-family home, down from a height of $554,000 in 2007. Similarly, condominium prices have declined from $335,000 in 2007 to approximately 208,000 for a condominium in 2009. Table 2-11 Home Sales Prices in Rancho Cucamonga Single-Family Detached Condominiums Zip Code Number of Units Median Price Change 08-09 Number of Units Median Price Change 08-09 91701 28 $306,000 -17.3% 4 $144,000 +4.9% 91730 51 $285,000 -20.8% 18 $176,000 -33.1% 91737 17 $400,000 +1.0% 2 $240,000 N/A 91739 40 $405,000 -18.8% 5 $320,000 +17.5% Total 136 $353,000 -78.7% 29 $208,000 +4.9% Source: DataC!uick, 2009. Although the sales prices ofsingle-family homes have dramatically declined since 2006 due to economic recession, the rents charged for apartment units have not declined as much. Apartment rents vary by location, size of unit, and amenities. Table 2-12 summarizes housing rental prices in May 2009 by the size of the unit. According to Zilpy.com, apartment rents varied from approximately $900 to $2,200 per unit in 2009. Table 2-12 Apartment Rents in Rancho Cucamonga Number of Bedrooms Number of Units Average Sq. Ft. per Unit Median Rent Apartments Section 8 Rents Studio 22 607 $905 $765 1 490 768 $995 $835 2 644 1,062 $1,295 $974 3 603 1,515 $1,700 $1,383 4 beds 313 2,301 $2,200 $1,617 Source: Zilpy, May 2009. 22 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-145 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 5. INVENTORY OF RESTRICTED PROJECTS Certain housing projects in the City are deed-restricted to remain affordable to lower income households. As of January 1, 2010, 1,953 restricted and publicly assisted affordable units are in Rancho Cucamonga. Table 2-13 is an inventory ofCity-assisted multiple-family projects. Figure 2-4 shows the location of affordable housing in Rancho Cucamonga. Table 2-13 Assisted Multiple-Family Projects Name Type Financial Assistance Assisted Units 1. Villa Del Norte Family RDA 87 2. Las Casitas Family RDA 14 3. Rancho Verde Village Family RDA 104 4. Mountainside Apts Family RDA 188 5. Monterey Village Family RDA 110 6. Olen Jones Senior RDA 96 7. Pepperwood Apts Family RDA 228 8. Villa Pacifica Senior RDA 158 9. Heritage Pointe Senior RDA 48 10. Olen Jones Senior Apts Senior RDA, HOME, LIHTC 96 11. Sunset Heights Family RDA 116 12. Parkview Place Apts Family MRB 30 13. Mountain View Apts Family MRB 54 14. Sycamore Terrance Family MRB 26 15. Evergreen Apts Family MRB 79 16.WaterbrookApts Family MRB 76 17. Villaggio at Route 66 Family RDA, LIHTC 131 18. San Sevaine Villas Family RDA, LIHTC 223 19. Rancho Verde Expansion Family RDA 40 Total - -- 7,775 Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga 2010-2015 ConPlan Notations: MRB =Mortgage Revenue Bond RDA =Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund HOME =HOME Investment Partnership Program LIHTC =Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 23 P-146 RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA ~, ----- . r i i i i ;. ~ , l ~. ~ I .1 t-• wd.a~ --•----- '` - - ~n - -~ ~~ - 4 =„ - - Upland '` e...im. -- ~ ~ I E Fontana Foatron cT ~ ~ ' Armes -~~ MMIroIWC ---------°-~ -'--~ ,\ ~ Stan Brrmudino U Ordario Affordable Housing Transportation Facilities Affordable Senior Housing ~ Metrolink Station Affordable Family Housing Omnitrans Fixed Transit Routes ® Low and Moderate Income Figure 2~t Affordable Housing and Low and Moderate Income Concentration 24 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-147 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 6. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY High housing costs are a concern in that they can price lower-income famffies out of the market, cause extreme housing cost burdens, or make it difficult to afford other necessities of life. However, housing affordability alone is not necessazily a fair housing issue. Fair housing concerns may azise only when housing (un)affordability is a result of unequal treatment of similarly situated individuals protected under fair housing law. Housing affordability is ofren based on a federal government definition. According to the US Census and federal housing guidelines, a housing unit is considered affordable when a household pays no more than 30 percent of gross income for housing. This figure typically includes standard housing allowances for utilities, insurance, etc. The income to housing cost ratio may be slightly higher for homeowners, as some of the housing costs are tax deductible. Table 2-14 shows the maximum affordable rent for housing. Table 2-14 Housing Affordability Income Income Affordable Price Group De£nitiont Threshold Ownership= Rental3 Very Low < 30%MFI $20,000 $41,000 $450 Low 31-50%MFI $33,300 $88,000 $732 Moderate 51-80%MFI $53,300 $164,000 $1,182 Middle 81-120%MFI $79,900 $266,000 $1,797 Source: Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element, 20012014. ' Income levels and limits dedved from offcial Department of Housing and Urban Development, published by the Depanment of Housing and Community Development, 2009. Assumes federal, not state, income thresholds. ~ Assumes an expenditure of 35°/ housing cost burden, a mortgage loan with a 10°/ down payment, 30-year tens, 7% interest rate, and standard housing cost allowances for insurance, property taxes, and other fees. s Median rents based on June 2009 rents taken from www.zilpy.com. Rental payments assume no more than 30% of income spent on rent and utilities. Given a median housing sales prices of about $353,000 for asingle-family home, $208,000 for a condominium, and $1,300 for an apartment, the affordability of housing can be determined. Generally speaking, the median priced home is generally affordable to above moderate income households, although smaller homes with less amenities could be afforded by moderate income households. Moderate income households can generally afford the median priced condominium and the majority of apartments in Rancho Cucamonga. Lower income households can also afford apartments and, in some cases, lower cost condominiums in Rancho Cucamonga. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 25 P-748 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 7. HOUSING PROBLEMS Housing problems typically refer to housing overpayment, housing overcrowding, and substandard housing (which was discussed on page 21.) Housing overpayment occurs when households pay 30 percent or more of income for housing costs. Moderate overpayment occurs when housing costs are 30 to 50 percent of one's income; severe overpayment occurs if payments exceed 50 percent of income. Overcrowding refers to a situation where more than one person occupies a habitable room in a home, and severe overcrowding occurs if more than 1.5 persons occupy a room. During the 2000s, housing overpayment increased throughout California. Housing prices and rents increased far faster than personal income, resulting in a higher percentage of households overpaying for housing. For those who purchased or refinanced homes with adjustable rate mortgages, overpayment became an increasing concern. In 2008, 51 percent of Rancho Cucamonga homeowners overpaid for housing, up from 37 percent in 2000. Among renters, 54 percent overpay for housing (of which half severely overpay for rental housing), which is up from 38 percent in 2000. Shown in Table 2-15, only 3 percent of all Rancho Cucamonga households lived in moderately overcrowded situations, and less than 1 percent lived in severely overcrowded conditions. While housing overcrowding is more prevalent in renter households, it does not appear to be a widespread problem, indicating that the unit size and cost generally corresponds to household size and income. However, with recent trends in foreclosures, the overcrowding rate would be expected to increase in the community. Table 2-15 Housing Problems Overpayment Overcrowding Households Renters Owners Renters Owners None 7,524 15,036 15,771 34,381 Moderate 4,800 9,539 977 695 Severe 4,159 6,260 149 127 Total 16,643 30,835 16,897 35,203 Percent of Households with Housing Problems None 46 % 49% 93% 96% Moderate 29% 31% 6% 3% Severe 25% 20% <1% <1% Source: 2006-2008 ACS Note: Homeowner overpayment is for those with a mortgage. 26 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-149 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 3. Public Policies Government policies, administrative practices, and procedures affect the amount, type, affordability, and accessibihty of housing in Rancho Cucamonga. This chapter reviews the various ways that Rancho Cucamonga exercises control over land use, zoning, building design, redevelopment, and other aspects that influence housing in Rancho Cucamonga. A. General Plan Land Use Policy California law requires each county and city to prepare a General Plan to guide long-range decisions on community development. The General Plan Land Use Element allows a variety of residential uses that are appropriate to serve resident needs. Table 3-1 summarizes the type ofhousing intended for each General Plan Land Use and corresponding zoning district. Additional guidance with respect to allowable land uses is set forth in Specific Plans in certain areas of the community. Table 3-1 Residential General Plan Designations General Plan Land Use Zoning Residential Development Type and Designation District Density Density 0 1 to 2 Accommodates single-family Very Low VL . du/ac detached homes, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feel 2 to 4 Accommodates single-family Low L du/ac detached homes, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet Accommodates single-family Low-Medium LM 4 to 8 detached and attached homes, or du/ac multiple-family uses (i.e., apartments, townhomes, and condominiums). 8 to 14 Accommodates multiple-family uses Medium M du/ac (i.e., apartments, townhomes, and condominiums). 14 to 24 Accommodates multiple-family uses Medium-High MH du/ac (i.e., apartments, townhomes, and condominiums). 24 to 30 Accommodates high density multiple- High H du/ac family uses (i.e., apartments, townhomes, and condominiums). 8 to 30 Accommodates a mix of residential Mixed Use MU du/ac and non-residential uses at a range of intensities and densities Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use Element, 2010. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 27 P-7 50 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 1. SPECIFIC/COMMUNITY PLANS The General Plan land use designations and zoning districts apply uniformly throughout the community. However, to address unique issues inherent to different parts of the community, the General Plan allows for Specific Plans and Planned Community Zonings. A description of Specific Plans and Planned Community Zonings and the applications of ones allowing residential uses in Rancho Cucamonga are summarized below. . Specific Plans. Rancho Cucamonga's three Specific Plans allow for flexibility in design and customized development standards tailored to specific needs and conditions. The Specific Plan is one of the most creative tools available for guiding and regulating development. Development regulations for specific plans are incorporated into the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. In some cases, such as the Terra Vista and Victoria communities, these plans allow for flexibility in trading densities among different areas without a general plan amendment. . Planned Community Zoning. Planned Community Zoning may be thought of as a less comprehensive form of a Specific Plan. It does allow custom design and development regulations, but its scope can be limited to only those aspects of the plan that deviate from conventional zoning requirements. It may include as many land use categories as are needed to implement the applicable General Plan designations. It is typically accompanied by thorough design guidelines. Table 3-2 below summarizes the specific plans and community zoning that allow for residential uses in Rancho Cucamonga. Table 3-2 Specific Plans and Planned Community Zoning Specific Plans Planned Communities Etiwanda North: accommodates Caryn: accommodated predominantly predominantly lower density lower density residential. residential developments. Etiwanda: accommodates Terra Vista: accommodates a mix of predominantly lower density residential and commercial uses in four residential developments. neighborhoods totaling 1,321 acres, which are linked by a greenway. Foothill Boulevard: provides a Victoria: encompasses 2,150 acres and balanced and unified pattern of provides for a series of residential residential and mixed development villages and related support uses, along Foothill Boulevard. designed around a central park. Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Generel Plan Land Use Element, 2010. 28 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-151 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Allowable Residential Uses The California Government Code requires all local and countygovernments to facilitate and encourage opportunities for a variety ofhousing types that maybe suitable for households of varying income levels and special needs. Local policies allowing housing types for persons of all income levels and backgrounds helps to increase housing choice and ensure that no one is excluded from a community due to protected status. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Development Code determines the types of housing and residential uses allowed in each zoning district of the community. Table 3-2 shows the various types ofhousing permitted. Table 3-3 Housing Permitted in Residential Zones Zone Housing Type Conventional Housing Single-Family Detached P P P P` NP NP Single-Family Attached NP NP P P P P Multiple-Family Housing NP NP P" P P P Mobile Home Parks C C C C C C Manufactured Unit NP P P P P P Guest House P P P NP NP NP Second Unit P P P NP NP NP Lodging Unit P P P NP NP NP Special Needs Housing Residential Care Facility Serving < 6 clients P P P P P P Serving 7 or more NP NP C C C C Student Housing C C C C C C Convalescent Center NP NP C C C C Family Day Care Serving < 8 clients P P P P P P Serving 8 or more C C C C C C Transitional Housing NP NP NP NP NP NP Emergency Shelters NP NP NP NP NP NP Permanent Supportive NP NP NP NP NP NP Source: Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. P=Permitted Use, P`=Permitted with Optional Development Standards, C=Conditional Use Permit; NP =Currently Not Permitted 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 29 P-152 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 2. RESIDENTIAL USES The 2010 General Plan and Development Code allow a range of conventional housing products-single-family, second units, mobile homes and manufactured housing, apartments, townhomes, and mixed use housing. Each use and the zone where it is allowed are summarized below. Single-Family Residential Single-family detached homes are permitted by right in three lower density residential zones. As discussed later, single-family residential homes are allowed to adhere to one of two development standards-basic and optional standards. Housing can be built at higher densities when following optional development standards in the medium density zone. Although many residents desire detached dwellings, attached products (typically condominiums) offer more affordable homeownership opportunities. Single-family attached homes include duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes. Single-family attached homes are not permitted in the lowest density zones, but are permitted by right in the LM, M, MH, and H zones. Second Units The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code defines a second unit as an accessory detached or attached dwelling unit that provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons. The City permits second units on parcels of 10,000 units or more in the VL, L, and LM zones as a by-right use with a ministerial process. For lots less than 20,000 square feet, the maximum second unit size is 640 square feet; for larger lots the maximum size is 940 square feet. The local water district generally does not issue new water connections to second units on lots smaller than 20,000 square feet. Although the City permits second units in compliance with State law, the water district policy of not issuing new water connections to lots smaller than 20,000 square feet may conflict with the actual intent of State law to facilitate and encourage the development of second units. Caretaker Units and Guest Houses Caretaker units and guest quarters can provide an additional type of housing, particularly for agricultural or estate homes, that is generally more affordable to lower income residents in Rancho Cucamonga. A caretaker unit is an accessory unit to a primary building that is intended for a caretaker, security guard, or similar position that benefits from onsite living quarters. Guest houses are limited to 640 square feet, but cannot have kitchen facilities nor be rented. The purpose of guest houses is to provide temporary housing for nonpaying guests of the occupants of the primary home. Both caretaker quarters and guest houses can be permitted by right as an accessory use in the VL, L, and LM zones. 30 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-153 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Mobile Homes and Manufactured Housing Slate law requires cities to allow mobile home parks within at least one designated zone. A mobile home park consists of mobile homes constructed in accordance with the Health and Safety Code. To that end, mobile home parks are conditionally permitted in all residential zones. State law also requires jurisdictions to permit mobile and manufactured units on single- family lots when the unit meets the location and design standards established for single-family uses in the Development Code. The City permits individual mobile home and manufactured homes on permanent foundations on a single lot in all residential zones except the VL zone. Apartments Multiple-family apartments are permitted by right in three zones-the M, MH, and H zones. Apartments and similar multiple-family housing products are permitted in the LM zone, provided such residential uses achieve the optional development standards in the Municipal Code. The allowance of apartments within a city is a key requirement of the California Department of Housing and Community Development, as this is the most feasible type of housing that can be affordable to lower income households. The City has approved a number of apartment projects in recent yeazs. Later sections of this chapter will assess the standazds required of apartments and whether they serve as a constraint to development. Mixed Use Pursuant to [he 2010 General Plan, the City has adopted a Mixed Use designation in recognition that portions of Rancho Cucamonga are evolving into more urban places, and that the community desires the creation of new, more sustainable development forms. Mixed Use development approaches offer opportunities for people to live close to work or near transit stops, to walk to neighborhood stores and parks, to enjoy indoor and outdoor entertainment close to home, and to experience exciting pedestrian districts. Mixed Use development may occur in either vertical or horizontal forms. To facilitate this type of development, specific plans and community plans set forth flexible development standazds for a particular project or physical or environmental constraints. The maximum floor area ratio established by the General Plan is set at 1.0 with a probable floor area ratio of 0.40. The density varies widely among the ]3 Mixed Use districts, with housing allowed anywhere between 14 and 100 units per acre. Further refinement of the City's various zoning districts or creation of new districts will be needed to facilitate and encourage mixed uses envisioned by the 2010 General Plan. 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 31 P-154 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 3. RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES The Welfare and Institutions Code (Lanterman-Petris Act) and the Health and Safety Code (Community Care Facilities Act) are both explicit in that it is state polity that people with disabilities are entitled to live in normal residential settings like people without disabilities. These laws are therefore intended to encourage cities to enact policies, development codes, permit processes, and administrative regulations that encourage the development of housing needed for people with disabilities so that they have the opportunity to live in any residential neighborhood. Residential care facilities covered under these acts include residential care facility for the elderly, social rehabilitation facilities, foster care, certain treatment facilities, and many others. According to the Department of Social Services, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has 36 facilities serving about 600 clients with disabilities. As shown on the following page, these facilities are distributed throughout the City and not unduly concentrated within low-moderate income areas. The City's policy is to observe the standard concentration regulations that are set forth by the Department of Social Services and in State law. The Health and Safety Code (44 1500 et seq.) requires that licensed community care facilities serving six or fewer persons be (1) treated the same as a residential use, (2) allowed by right in all residential zones, and (3) treated the same with respect to regulations, fees, taxes, and permit processes as other residential uses in the same zone. The Health and Safety Code extends this protection to residential care facilities for the elderly (44 1569.84 et seq.), to alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facilities (4411834.22 et seq.), and to congregate care facilities (441267.16 et seq.), all of which serve no more than six clients. The Development Code currently defines residential care facilities as any home, group care facility, or similar facility for 24-hour nonmedical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities ofdaily living or for the protection ofthe individual. This definition complies with relevant sections of California law. The City permits such facilities serving six or fewer persons by right as directed by State law in all residential zones and conditionally allows care facilities serving seven or more persons in four zones-LM, M, MH, and H. These facilities are treated like any other residential use in the same zone. Figure 3-1 on the following page illustrates the relationship of residential care facilities to the City's low and moderate income concentrations and major transit routes in the community. 32 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-155 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~, --- -- ----- ----- --------- ~ --------- ~ --- ~ r i ~ ; ~ l • Hllbfds • 5. ~ I I ----•--_IWUeon ~ ~ a ' ~~ < L.. ~ f _ B°ny°n -- •~. Upland •, • • • eeellne _ ,v-~ .~ ~ 3 - ~ • • I • ® g Fontana • '~ • ® b m ~FootMll o d w ~~ I ~ . -_ _ • __ 6. • M k _ ____-_-__.___ ____- - ~h , • atrolln __ __ _~__.____ ~ ~ , s ~ • c ~ - ~ ~ ~ I __ S ~ - j ~ Sqn Bemertlino _ , I Ontario Care Facilities Transportation Facilities • Adult Day Care Onitrans Fixed Transit Route • Adult Residential Facility ~ Metrolink Station • Group Home • Residential Care for the Elderly • Small Family Homes Low and Moderate Income Figure 3-1 Dispersion of Residential Care Facilities 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 33 P-156 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 4. HOUSING FOR HOMELESS PEOPLE The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the problem ofhomelessness in the community, the complex causes associated with homelessness, and the need for specialized facilities and supportive services to meet this need. State law has fundamentally changed the way communities address this need. The Government Code requires that jurisdictions specify at least one zone where a yeaz-round emergency shelter can be permitted as a by-right use. Transitional housing and supportive housing must be treated like any other residential use subject to the same regulations as other residential uses. The following describe how housing for homeless people is currently provided for in Rancho Cucamonga as well as the changes proposed. • Emergency shelter. The City conditionally permits emergenry shelters m the General Commercial District (citywide) and parts of the General Industrial District (Subareas 1, 3, 4, and 5). To comply with recent changes to State law pursuant to Senate Bill 2, the 2008-2014 Housing Element proposes to allow such uses as a by-right use in the General Commercial (GC) Zone with development and operational standards as allowed under State law. . Transitional Housing. The City currently does not permit transitional housing in the community. To comply with recent changes to State law pursuant to Senate Bi112, the 2008-2014 Housing Element has a program to amend the Municipal Code to permit transitional housing serving up to six clients like residential care facilities as a by-right use in all residential zones. For larger facilities serving more than seven clients where the use operates like multiple-family projects, such uses will be permitted where multiple-family projects are permitted. . Supportive Housing. The City currently does not permit supportive housing in the community. To comply with recent changes to State law pursuant to Senate Bi112, the 2008-2014 Housing Element has a program to amend the Municipal Code to permit supportive housing serving up to six clients like residential care facilities as a by-right use in aB residential zones. For larger facilities serving more than seven clients where such use operates like multiple-family projects, such uses will be permitted where multiple-family projects are permitted. The above changes to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code will be implemented within one year of adoption of the 2008-2014 Housing Element. The 2008-2014 Housing Element is currently under reviewby the Department of Housing and Community Development and these programs are included as implementation items scheduled as noted above. 34 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-157 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA B. Development Policy The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code regulates the type, location, density, and scale of residential development. The Development Code is designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and general welfare of residents; preserve the character and integrity ofresidential neighborhoods; and implement policies of the General Plan. 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The City's residential development standards are arranged into [wo general categories-basic and optional. These standards are used in conjunction with the Absolute Policies and Design Guidelines during the residential land development/design review process. However, additional variations are allowed to encourage and facilitate mixed-use developments. Basic Standards. The Basic Development Standards apply to all residential projects and are intended to ensure qualityresidentialprojects. A residential development over four units per acre is generally limited to the midpoint of the allowable density range. The development standards and density are intended to create a development that will be compatible and provide for proper transitions from sensitive or less intense residential development. Optional Standards. Optional Standards are intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. Optional standards allow development at the higher end of the designated density range. However, the standards and development expectations are higher than the basic standards in order to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower intense residential uses. The final density allowed in any residential district is determined by the design review process and public hearings. Mixed-Use Standards. Mixed Use District development proposals in Rancho Cucamonga are required to be approved through master plan procedures. Existing development standards for each land use category are the basis of standards for each category within amixed-use development plan, but they may be modified by the City during the master plan review process. Development agreements between the property owners and the City may also be used as implementation measures for any amended standards or review procedures. Table 3-4 on the following page provides a summary of basic and optional development standards for residential uses in Rancho Cucamonga. 2010-2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 35 P-158 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Type of Standard Table 3-4 Residential Development Standards Zoning Designation Low- Medium Very Low Low Medium Medium High Basic Standards Up to 2 Up to 4 Up to 6 Up to 11 Up to 19 Up to 27 Optional Standards 2-4 4-8 6-14 11-24 19-30 Minimum Lot Size (sq. ft.) Basic Standards 20,000 7,200 5,000 3 acres z 3 acres z 3 acres 2 Optional Standards 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres Maximum Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% Minimum Unit Size (sq. ft.) +Single-Family(Att/Detached) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 +Multiple-family Studio 550 550 550 550 550 550 +Multiple-familyl-bdrtn 650 650 650 650 650 650 +Multiple-family 2-bdrm 800 800 800 800 800 800 +Multiple-family 3-bdrm 950 950 950 950 950 950 Maximum Height ' Basic Standards 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. ° 40 ft. ° 50 ft. ° Optional Standards 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. ° 40 ft. ° 55 ft. ° Setbacks (feet) + Front Yard (averege) 42 37 32 37 Not Required + Rear Yard (feet) 60 20 15 105 Not Required Building Separation Not Required 25 ft. 10-30ft.s ~ 10-30ft.s I 10-30ft.e Open Space + Private Space (1°t/2ntl Floor) 2,000/NR 1,000/NR 300/150 255/150 150/100 150/100 + Common Space (minimum) Not Required 30% 30% 30% Optional Standards None 5% 10% 35% 35% 35% + Usable Open Space 65% 60% 40% 35% 35% 35% Optional Standards None 60% 45% 40% 40% 40% Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, 2010. Density ranges shown are those permitted following the basic development standards. Higher densities ran be achieved if additional optional development standards are complied with. ~ On existing lots of record, parcels less than 3 acres in size or those without the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. 3 In hillside areas height is limted to 30 feet. ° Multiple-family buildings are limited to one story if they are within 100 feet of a VL or L district. 5 Add 10 feet, for a total of a 20.foot setback, if adjacent to a VL, L, or LM distdct. e Building separation varies depending on situation-e.g., front-to-front patio without sidewalk (10 feet) to front-to-front with common patio wall (30 feet)--per Development Code Section 17.08.040-E. 36 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-159 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 2. PARKING REQUIREMENTS Local government parking requirements are often cited by various How Can Parking Requirements organizations as potential constraints to the development of housing, Be a Fair Housing Issue? particularly multiple-family rental housing. However, adequate parking On June 26, 2004, the Court requirements are necessary to not only ensure adequate vehicle storage entered the consent decree space for residents and their guests, but also to maintain the quality and against the San Buenaventura safe of the housin ro ect. n' g P J Housing Authority for failure to make reasonable accommodation for parking. The Court found that The Rancho Cucamonga Development Code has established parking the Housing Authority requirements that relate to the intended use and number of bedrooms or discriminated against a former units (and by extension potential drivers). Existing parking standards are tenant who is mobility impaired listed by residential developmenttypeinTable3-S.Guestpazkingspacesare and required the useofawalker, when it refused to grant a required at a ratio of one parking space for each four multifamily units. reasonable accommodation for accessible parking at a housing Table 3-5 complex it owns and manages. Residential Parking Standards Unit Type Per Unit Requirement Single-Family Detached 2 enclosed spaces per unit Second Unit ~ 1 enclosed space per bdrm Cluster Development (Townhome, Mobile home, etc.) Studio 1.3 parking spaces, of which at least 1 space is covered One Bedroom 1.5 parking spaces, of which at least 1 space is covered Two Bedrooms ~ .8 parking spaces, of which at least 1 space is covered Three Bedrooms 2.0 parking spaces, of which at least 2 spaces are covered Four or more Bedrooms 2.3 parking spaces, of which at least 2 spaces are covered Source: Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. A covered space ran be in a carport or garage. In recognition of the need to offer parking standards tailored specifically to the likely number of vehicles owned by residents, the City has adopted an Affordable Housing Incentives program that mirrors State density bonus law. Density bonus projects are eligible for reduced parking standards as an incentive for providing affordable housing. A density bonus project is allowed to provide 1.0 onsite space per studio and one-bedroom unit, 2.0 onsite spaces for two- and three-bedroom units, and 2.5 onsite spaces for units with four or more bedrooms. These numbers aze inclusive of both guest parking and handicapped/disabled person parking. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 37 P-7 60 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 3. AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides several incentives for affordable housing development in accordance with Government Code Sections 65915-65918 and other portions of the Development Code. The primary incentives available that facilitate affordable housing are below. Density Bonus State law requires cities to grant a density bonus of 20 percent above the maximum permitted density in the General Plan if a project provides at least 5 percent of the units affordable for very low income households or 10 percent at rates affordable to low income households. If 10 percent of condominiums are restricted to moderate income households, the project is eligible fora 5 percent density bonus. A sliding scale allowing additional density bonuses above [he 20 percent threshold (up to 35 percent maximum) is available for qualified projects. Any project that meets the State density bonus criteria is also entitled to receive one to three concessions based on the percentage of restricted units and affordability. Senior Housing Overlay District The Senior Housing Overlay District offers incentives to encourage the development of affordable housing for seniors earning up to 80 percent of MFI. The Development Code defines a senior household for this overlay as a married couple in which at least one spouse is age 55 or over or an unmarried household in which all members are age 55 or over. The Municipal Code does not prescribe the percentage of units to be restricted as affordable. The Development Code provides incentives such as required onsite parking, fee waivers/reductions, and a density bonus if the project complies with State density bonus law. To remove the appearance of a potential fair housing impediment, the definition of a senior household should be based on age alone, rather than the marital status of a senior. Financial and RegulatoryIncentives Rancho Cucamonga offers other financial and regulatory incentives to help facilitate housing. Similar to other nonaffordable projects, the City does implement procedures for variance and minor exceptions that allow for a modification of development standards where unique property hardships exist and can create a hardship in complying with the Development Code. The characteristics must be unique to the property. The Planning Director may approve up to a 10 percent reduction in applicable development standards and a 25 percent reduction in parking. Under a vaziance, the Planning Commission may offer additional reductions in standards. The City has an established history in working with property owners where feasible to modify standards that make projects feasible provided the proposed project meets the City's expectations for quality and compatibility. 38 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-161 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 4. BUILDING CODES AND ACCESSIBILITY Rancho Cucamonga has adopted [he 2007 California Building Code with local amendments. The Code is a set of uniform health and safety regulations that cover buildings and various systems, including mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and fire safety. They are generally considered to be the minimum acceptable standards for public health and safety. The code includes various chapters related to mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and other topics. Under State law, jurisdictions are allowed to make local, more restricted amendments to the California Building Code provided they are necessary due to local climatic, geological, or topographic conditions. Rancho Cucamonga has made local amendments to address fire hazards, wind hazards, and seismic hazards. These amendments are important to addressing special structural needs for building along the urban-wildlife interface in a hot and dry climate and an area of frequent seismic activity. Building Design and the Fair Housing Act The City's adopted Building Code contains and incorporates the latest accessibility standards required by the State and Federal government in compliance with applicable laws. In brief, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that new covered multifamily housing consisting of four or more units with an elevator be designed and constructed to be accessible. AB units must comply with seven design and construction requirements of the Fair Housing Act: • Accessible entrance on an accessible route . Accessible public and common-use areas . Usable doors . Accessible route into and through the dwelling unit . Accessible switches, outlets, thermostats, and environmental controls • Reinforced walls in bathrooms . Usable kitchens and bathrooms To afford persons with disabilities the right to live in a suitable home under the Fair Housing Act, a housing provider may allow a reasonable accommodation. This is a change in rules, policies, practices, or services so that a person with a disability will have an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling unit or common space. Housing providers are not required to make changes that would fundamentally alter the program or create an undue financial and administrative burden. For instance, a housing provider could accommodate a tenant with a mobility impairment by fulfilling the tenant's request for a reserved parking space in front of the entrance to their unit, even though all parking is unreserved. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 39 P-162 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA The housing provider may also allow for a reasonable modification. A reasonable modification is a structural modification that is made to allow persons with disabilities the full enjoyment of the housing and related facilities. Examples of a reasonable modification would include allowing a person with a disability to: install a ramp into a building, lower the entry threshold of a unit, or install grab bars in a bathroom. Reasonable modifications are usually made at the resident's expense. However, if one lives in federally assisted housing or the covered multifamily project was built without required accommodations, the housing provider may be required to pay a portion or all the costs for the modification. Building Code Interpretation Questions may arise regarding the interpretation of building codes or accessibility standards. The Municipal Code establishes a Housing Advisory and Appeals Board consisting of 3 members and 2 alternates who are qualified by experience and training to make recommendations pertaining to building construction and who are not employees of the City. The Building and Safety Official is an ex officio member and acts as Secretary to the Board, but will not vote. The Board adopts rules of procedure for conducting its business, and shall render all decisions and findings in writing to the appellant with a duplicate copy to the Building Official. In conversations with City staff, there have been no recent examples or cases where the Housing Advisory and Appeals Board has been convened to address interpretations of either the Building Code or the Housing Code. The City's administrative practice is to use the informal building permit approval process to address potential accessibility issues as they arise. Nonetheless, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is in the process of putting together a work program, as part of the 2008-2014 Housing Element, to develop a reasonable accommodation process that would apply in Rancho Cucamonga. This program would standardize the process ofrequesting and addressing the need for reasonable accommodations. The federal Fair Housing Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make reasonable accommodation in building codes, zoning/land use regulations, and administrative practices to afford disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. In 2001, [he State Attorney General also issued a letter encouraging local governments [o adopt a reasonable accommodation procedure. The 2008-2014 Housing Element includes a program for the City to create a reasonable accommodation ordinance that would specify the process for obtaining a reasonable accommodation, the required findings, and other procedural aspects [o assist in this matter. 40 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-163 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 5. RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW SYSTEM The Municipal Code (Section 17.06.030) has instituted a residential growth management review system that applies to residential development projects that will result in the subdivision of residential lots and/or the construction of new residential dwelling units and mobile home parks. However, exemptions to the ordinance are allowed for developments involving four units or less, residential land divisions involving four lots or less, and government-subsidized senior citizen housing projects. Approval Criteria All residential development projects not specifically exempted in Rancho Cucamonga are required to be processed under the growth management review procedure set forth in Section 17.060.010 of the Development Code. This procedure contains additional criteria based upon community objectives expressed as General Plan policies. These criteria are: • Absolute Policies. Each project must satisfy absolute policies intended to ensure neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequary of public facilities and services, and protection of the public environment and public health. • Development Standards. Each project must adhere to residential development standards that address topics such as minimum requirements for setback, lot area, building height, open space, and other standards that address the livability of the project. . Design Guidelines. Each residential project must also adhere to City design goals that encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property, including neighborhood compatibility, site planning, architecture, and landscaping. To initiate the process, the Developer files an application for Residential Development Review with the Planning Department on a form prescribed by the Planning Director. After the forms are complete and reviewed for accuracy, a public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled. The Planning Commission can approve the project only if specific (and generally standard) findings have been made that are outlined in the Municipal Code. The Development Code exempts certain projects from meeting these requirements-residential developments (single-family units, duplexes, and triplexes) involving a total of four units or less and government-assisted senior citizen projects. While this permitting and development practice has historically not been a constraint, it nonetheless considers family apartments differently than senior apartment projects and thus could be considered a potential impediment to fair housing in Rancho Cucamonga. 2010-2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 41 P-164 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA C. Housing and Neighborhood Policy The City of Rancho Cucamonga implements a wide variety of housing strategies that are intended to encourage the construction of new housing, offer rental assistance, preserve existing housing choices in the community, focus reinvestment into redevelopment project areas, and address other requirements ofState and Federal law. This section summarizes some of the pertinent requirements the City addresses. 1. PUBLIC HOUSING The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino administers the Housing Choice Voucher program for Rancho Cucamonga. This program provides lower income households with subsidies for rental housing. This program helps residents living in substandard housing afford to move to safer homes and to reduce the burden on lower income households severely overpaying for housing. Voucher recipients may also receive supportive services to help them become economically self-sufficient. In 2009, 91 Rancho Cucamonga residents participated in the program. Although the federal government issues many rental vouchers to communities, the number of eligible residents far exceed the number of available vouchers. Therefore, the Housing Authority of San Bernardino (HACSB) has adopted policies to allocate vouchers only to those considered most in need based on admission preferences. At least 75 percent of all vouchers must be allocated to extremely low income households and the remainder must be allocated to very low income households. The HACSB has additional preferences for veterans and their families. Applicants on the waiting list with equal preference status are selected by a lottery technique. The Housing Authority manages 12 public housing units and issues vouchers to 136 households, of which 100 are for one-bedroom units. HACSB has four admissions preferences for public housing and vouchers. In order of priority, these preferences are: 1) veterans and veteran's families; 2) working families and those unable to work because of age or disability; 3) residents who live and/or work in the jurisdiction; and 4) households that contribute to meeting income goals. Under the current contract with HACSB, the City of Rancho Cucamonga does not have the ability to set its own preferences, reallocate project-based vouchers to other uses (permanent supportive housing or apartments), or apply for or make other programmatic adjustments. 42 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-165 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2. HOUSING ELEMENT COMPLIANCE The State of California is unique for its requirement of a Housing Element. Enacted in 1969, State housing element law (Government Code Section 65553 et seq.) requires that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of their community through the preparation of a Housing Element. The Housing Element is intended to guide local government policies and programs to encourage the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing. The Rancho Cucamonga 2008-2014 Housing Element has six goals: 1. Allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types, maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units, and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations. 2. Provide housing opportunities that meet the needs of all economic segments of the community including very low, low, and moderate income households and special needs groups. 3. Provide quality residential environments which contribute to a well- functioningcommunity byensuring residential development which is not only attractive in design, but which functions to protect the public safety and welfare, and provide benefits to the community. 4. Conserve and improve the existing housing stock, including structures ofhistoric significance, and eliminate the causes and spread ofblight by encouraging the investment of public and private funds in housing rehabilitation and public improvements. 5. Where possible, eliminate governmental constraints to the production, maintenance, and improvement of housing. 6. Promote equal housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community regardless of race, sex, or religion. To further these housing and community development goals, the Rancho Cucamonga Housing Element lists 25 different housing programs to be implemented during the planning period of 2008 through 2014. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Housing Element has been submitted to the California Depaztment of Housing and Community Development for review. City staff are presently working with the state to address specific comments. Once these comments have been addressed, the City expects to receive a letter of compliance that the Department finds that the Housing Element is in substantial compliance with State housing element law. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 43 P-166 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA A fundamental part of the 2005-2014 Housing Element is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment, referred to as the RHNA. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is allocated a RHNA construction goal of 1,282 housing units for the 2006-2014 planning period. Of that total, the RHNA is divided into four household income groups based upon State guidelines. The housing units must accommodate the following affordability guidelines: • 317 units of housing affordable [o very low income households • 216 units of housing affordable to low income households • 245 units of housing affordable to moderate income households . 504 units of housing affordable to above moderate income households State law allows cities to obtain credits towards its Housing Element RHNA goals in three ways: 1) counting housing units constructed, building permits issued, and projects approved during the planning period; 2) counting qualified projects that have been substantially rehabilitated, preserved, or where the City has purchased affordability covenants, and 3) setting aside adequately zoned land for housing. The table below summarizes how the City will meets its obligations. The City has identified additional vacant land that has adequate zoning and development standards in place to accommodate the remaining need for housing affordable to very low, low, and moderate income households. The Housing Element provides additional information about this requirement. Table 3~ to Address the RHNA Income Level Approved Projects Very Low Low Mod. Above Construction Villaggio on Route 66 66 65 0 35 San Sevaine Villas 109 55 59 2 Rancho Verde Easl 19 21 0 0 Market Rate Units 0 0 0 2,018 Subtotal 194 141 59 2,055 Conservation Multifamily Housing (New Affordability Agreement) Monterey Village 15 15 0 0 Mountainside 15 15 0 0 Subtotal 30 30 0 0 Total Credits 224 171 59 2,055 2006-2014 RHNA 317 216 245 504 Balance of RHNA 93 45 166 0 44 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-167 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 3. HOUSING PRESERVATION The Fair Housing Guide identifies that activities causing displacement (e.g., revitalization of neighborhoods, tax increases, demolition of subsidized housing, replacement policies, etc.) can affect opportunities of minority households or individuals with disabilities to select housing that is appropriate, accessible, and suitable to their needs. Policies that encourage the conversion of apartments to condominiums and/or the demolition of mobile homes can restrict housing choices as well. Condominium Conversion The City of Rancho Cucamonga regulates the conversions of apartments to condominiums so as to encourage a balanced supply and price of rental and ownership housing, maintain and encourage the supply of affordable rental and ownership housing for low and moderate income persons, and promote the residential stability and quality of the community by developing neighborhood identity, discouraging displacement of residents, and facilitating affordable rental and home ownership opportunities. As a means of preserving the City's rental housing stock, the City has established a Condominium Conversion Ordinance consistent with Stale law guidelines. The Condominium Conversion Ordinance does not require a vacancy rate threshold to trigger the appropriate number of units allowed for conversion. Rather the Ordinance establishes a maximum annual limit equal to no more than one-half the number of multifamily rental dwellings added to the City's housing stock during the preceding year, for the number of multifamily rental units that maybe converted to ownership type. Mobile Home Preservation Mobile home parks are often occupied by seniors or families with limited incomes. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65563.7, the preservation of mobile home units is encouraged in Rancho Cucamonga as such units provide an additional source of affordable housing. The City has not adopted an ordinance to preclude the conversion ofmobile home parks but, in conjunction with State law regulations for relocation and preservation, provides financial resources to encourage their preservation. The Redevelopment Agenry implements a Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program that provides up to $100 per month toward the rent of a mobile home space for households earning at or below 60 percent of the MFI and paying 30 percent or more of their income on housing. In addition, the City administers a Mobile Home Accord, which serves as a rent stabilization agreement between the City and the eight mobile home park owners. In 2009, the Accord for aseven-year participation agreement was renewed and all eight mobile home parks in the City participated in the Accord. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 45 P-168 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Preservation of Publicly Assisted Units Six publicly assisted housing projects with a total of 313 units may be at risk of losing rent subsidies or converting to market rate by 2014. Specifically, many households residing in publicly assisted housing are extremely low income households with limited housing opportunities elsewhere. To meet the needs of lower income households, the City's draft Housing Element sets forth a program to address this issue as follows: 1. Continue to keep in contact with the owners of projects with units due to convert to market rate to determine the status of their projects; 2. Continue to contact the owners of all units at risk and discussed options for retaining restricted affordable units; 3. Work with private and non-profit agencies interested in purchasing and/or managing units at-risk. On a case-by-case basis, provide technical assistance to these organizations; 4. On a case-by-case basis as opportunities arise, enter into agreements with property owners to preserve existing affordable housing units; and S. Purchase, or assist in the purchase, of projects that include units at-risk, as funds are available. Neighborhood Stabilization The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 ("HERA") appropriated funds for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes and residential properties. Grants under HERA are considered CDBG funds and are implemented through the Neighborhood Stabilization Program ("NSP"). NSP Cunding is determined by a statewide formula that consider factors such as the number ofloans that are in foreclosure, subprime, in default, or delinquent, and then factored in local criteria such as local foreclosure estimates and local vacancy rates. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a direct recipient of NSP funds and received $2.1 million to address foreclosure issues within the community. The City's NSP program operates two activities 1) an Acquisition/Rehabilitation and Resale -First Time Homebuyer Program where acquired properties will be available to households earning up to 120 percent of the AMI, and 2) an Acquisition/Rehabilitation and Reuse - AffordableHousing Program where acquired properties will be available to households earning below 50 percent of the AMI. These programs are available in selected census tracts experiencing a high foreclosure risk. 46 2010.2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-169 jZAlvcNo C-,UCAMONGA 4. REDEVELOPMENT POLICY State redevelopment law requires that all redevelopment agencies in California set aside 20 percent of the tax increment received from a redevelopment project area into a low and moderate income housing fund. Tax increment funds are required to be used for blight elimination, economic development, and housing and community development purposes. Agencies must use housing funds for the purpose of increasing, improving, and preserving the area's affordable housing units. Generally, redevelopment law requires that 15 percent of the units constructed within the redevelopment project area must be affordable [o low and moderate income residents, 6 percent available to persons of very low income and 9 percent affordable to persons of low or moderate income. There are further restrictions as to the proportion that can be spent on seniors versus families based on the relative proportions each group makes up in the City. Projects can be spent within or outside the redevelopment project areas, although the credits for such activity vary accordingly. In the 1980s, the City entered into a settlement agreement with the Western Center for Law and Poverty to further clarify how tax increment funds should be spent for affordable housing. Table 3-7 shows the percentage breakdown by affordability level. In other words, if the RDA allocates resources to 100 units of housing, the affordability requirement of the units are as follows: 17 units for households with Level I incomes, 34 units for households with Level 2 incomes, 34 units for households with Level III income, and 17 units for households with level IV income. Table 3-7 Redevelopment Housing Production Requirements Income Level Income Threshold Affordability Allocation Level I < 35% of AMI 1 /6 of units (17%) Level II 36%-45% of AMI 1/3 of units (34%) Level III 46%-60% of AMI 1/3 of units (33%) Level IV 61%-90% of AMI' 1/6 of units (17%) Source: Redevelopment Implementation Plan, Annual Repoli. As of January 1, 2010, a total of 2,424 restricted, affordable units have been provided to meet the RDA's affordability obligation. Of these, 1,403 units are located within the redevelopment project area. The following page illustrates the location of the City's redevelopment project areas. In addition, a chart is provided showing the buildout of the redevelopment project areas of 3,042 units and the number of units, according to the settlement agreement, according to the verylow, low, and moderate income affordability categories under State redevelopment law. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impedimen45 to Fair Housing Choice 47 P-170 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Oni 3,042 3000 2500 2,232 2000 o 1.909 1,ffi5 600 1,441 1,216 1000 500 319 301 n t 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 199] 2000 2003 2006 3009 308 2015 2018 Ysare 'Very LOw ONh Low/Moderere Uniw ~Torel Unit Development 48 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-171 RANGHO C,UCAMONGA D. Local Government Services The Americans with Disabilities Act guarantees equal opportunity for people with disabilities in buildings, employment, transportation, government services, and telecommunications. This section highlights those areas that directly affect the City and the provision of services. 1. PUBLIC BUILDINGS People with disabilities are often unable to fully participate in the activities of City government, such as public meetings, unable to attend City functions, and unable to gain access to the City's programs and services. Title II of ADA requires city governments to ensure all of their programs, services, and activities, when viewed in their entirety, are accessible to people with disabilities. There are many ways to address this requirement. When choosing between possible options, however, citygovernments must give priority to the choices that offer services, programs, and activities in the most integrated setting appropriate. In addition, all newly constructed City facilities must be fully accessible to people with disabilities. Rancho Cucamonga is committed to making public buildings accessible to further opportunities to people with disabilities, as required by the ADA. The City's mission statement reflects its commitment to "ensure that its programs, services, and facilities are accessible to all members of and visitors to the community." With this broad mission statement, the City's ADA Consultant Team initiated Phase I of the ADA Compliance Program with the purpose of encompassing programs and activities associated with civic buildings and recreational facilities within the community. The City created a Transition Plan that incorporates these activities into a single document to guide ongoing efforts to comply with the letter and spirit ofADA and implementing regulations. The City's ADA Coordinator indicated that all of the improvements envisioned in the Transition Plan are complete. Given the recent incorporation of the community, most of the public facilities are recently constructed buildings and generally compliant. However, as the buildings age and need to be rehabilitated, renovated, or adapted to different uses, care is taken to ensure that the latest in accessibility features are incorporated. In addition, the City of Rancho Cucamonga routinely allocates a portion of its CDBG funds and other funding sources to complete site improvements that improve access for people with disabilities to various public buildings. These improvements include full sidewalks, ramps in addition to steps, curb cuts, and other accessibility features. Parking spaces reserved for people with a disability aze also provided at each public facffity. As the need azises, other building modifications are also made. Public Accommodations The Justice Department entered into a settlement agreement with the West End YMCA, which covers branches in Ontario, Chino, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga. The settlement agreement was against West End YMCA for terminating a child from its after-school child care program because the child has autism. Under the agreement, the West End YMCA will implement policies and procedures to ensure that children with disabilities are afforded a full and equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from child care services. Written policies will be included in the YMCA's parent handbooks, and staff involved in child care decisions will be trained on ADA obligations. The West End YMCA also agreed to pay monetary damages to the complainant. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 49 P-172 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 2. PARKS AND RECREATION The City of Rancho Cucamonga has approximately 334 acres of developed parkland. An additional 47 acres of special use facilities have been developed. The City's park system also consists of approximately 293 acres of trails and bikeways that connect residences to park, recreational, and community facilities. The City's park system consists of a hierarchy of parks and special use facilities that are intended to be distributed among the community and provide a variety of recreational opportunities for residents. To ensure equality in services, the City maintains a park standard of 5.0 acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents Moreover, each park type has criteria for size and intended service area radius (expressed in '/+ mile). In general, most residential areas of the City are within the established service radius of a neighborhood park or community park. The area northeast of Chaffey College bordered by Deer Creek is not within any service area of parks. Also, areas southeast of Interstate 15 are no[ within the service areas of City parks, but two proposed parks should address that deficiency. Making all City park facilities and recreational programs accessible to people of all abilities is also a very high priority in Rancho Cucamonga. The City is gradually retrofitting all park facilities in order to be accessible to people with disabilities. Through partnerships, collaborations, and reasonably-priced classes, the City offers recreational and social opportunities for those with developmental and physical disabilities through the "IncredABLES/Special Needs" programming. The City of Rancho Cucamonga offers the following classes to residents with disabilities: • Rising Stars. Rising Stars provides therapeutic and recreational horseback riding lessons to physically and mentally challenged children and adults. Horseback riding improves balance, self-discipline, and self-confidence. . Classes. The Community Services Department offers recreational classes in Gymnastics, Star Performers, dancing, martial arts, cooking, and sports (e.g., basketball). Sports lessons vary throughout the year. Special Events. The City also offers special events such as a Prom, Festival of the Arts, and Friday Night Fund Club. These activities provide opportunities for residents with disabilities to come together for activities. City-sponsored opportunities for recreation for people of all abilities are promoted on the City's website and through a publication, The Grapevine, which is mailed to residents each month. Additional recreational opportunities are offered by community organizations. 50 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-173 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA 3. TRANSIT SERVICES Accessibility to public transit is a factor in housing choice for many households, especially lower income and senior households that may have limited or no access to a personal vehicle. For these households, access to public transit can be critical for employment and necessities such as grocery shopping, health care, and other routine activities of daily life. This section analyzes the transit system in Rancho Cucamonga and its role in furthering fair housing opportunity within the community. Transit agencies that receive federal funds are required to prepare ashort- rangetransportation plan that demonstrates that no persons are subject to discrimination in the level and quality of transportation services and/or transit-related benefits based on protected status. This provides the opportunity to reexamine transit needs based on changing demographics and land use patterns, changes in the importance of destinations within a service area, and funding capacity to expand or adjust services. Omnitrans is responsible for providing the majority of transit services in Rancho Cucamonga and cities in San Bernardino County through a joint powers agreement of the County and 15 cities. Omnitrans complies with the appropriate ADA requirements; it does not discriminate against people with disabilities in the provision of their services. Omnitrans complies with requirements for accessible new vehicles, makes good faith efforts to purchase/lease accessible used buses, remanufactures buses in an accessible manner, and provides paratransit where fixed-route service is offered. Omnitrans offers Access, a public transportation service designed to provide equal access to public transportation for persons who are physically or cognitively unable to use regular bus service. Access provides curb-to-curb service for up to a '/,-mile radius on either side of an existing bus route seven days a week. Service is available on the same days and times that routes in the area operate. Access service allows riders to bring aboard a service animal or a personal care attendant for free. Riders can also bring aboard a wheelchair or mobility device within a specified weight limit. Approximately 8 percent of the population in the Omnitrans service area is 65 years and older. The need for accessible transit and paratransit services and discounted fares will increase as the population ages in place. This trend will become more apparent as the current baby boomers reach 75 years of age and rely more on transit service. Based on projections of [he transportation disability population and ridership demand, and in the absence of any (demand management) interventions, travel demand for Access is projected to increase by 36 percent between 2005 and 2015. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 51 P-174 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act requires public transit agencies receiving federal funds to ensure that that they are furthering fair opportunity and equal access to transit services without regazd to race or the economic status of the residents. Specifically, transit providers are required to demonstrate that no persons served with transit are subject to discrimination in the level or quality of transportation services and/or transit-related benefits based on protected status of the individual served. Omnitrans periodically prepares the Short-Range Transportation Plan (SRTP) to "provide the San Bernardino Valley with comprehensive mass transportation services which maximize customer use, comfort, safety, and satisfaction while efficiently using financial and other resources in an environmentally sensitive manner." The plan sets forth 13 principles to further define the purpose and direction for service policies and design standards. The following "equity principle" is particularly salient: ....theguidelines shouldpromote the availability of a basic level of transit mobility to all residents of the Omnitrans service area, particularly those without access to other modes of transportation. This principle also includes the provision of appropriate municipal infrastructure tosupport this basic level ojservice in all communities (e.g., streets designated jor use by transit vehicles, accessible bus stops and shelters, and appropriate use of transit priority measures). This principle also ensures compliance with Federal Title VI requirements. Omnitrans has developed a grid service network with routes spaced at one- mile intervals, resulting in equitable transit service coverage, with most urban areas of the San Bernardino Valley within'h mile of a transit route. Omnitrans Focuses on high ridership corridors that coincidently have high concentrations of economically disadvantaged persons. ADA- complementary paratransitservice isprovided within'/, mile ofa scheduled regular transit route in accordance with federal regulations. Care has been taken in SRTP to incorporate Scenario 1: Financially Constrained Service Plan, to maintain transit service in low-income and minority neighborhoods. Service design guidelines provide a tool for designing and evaluating the equity of transit services. This AI conducted an additional spatial analysis of employment centers and residential neighborhoods (Figures 3-2 and 3-3 on the following pages). While residential neighborhoods appeared well served (except for north ofthe I-210), several employment centers south of Arrow Highway need additional transit coverage. The City could work with Omintrans to incorporate these route adjustments as part of their 2014 update to the short-range transportation plan. 52 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-175 RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA I , ` L . _, ~ ~ ~ '1.. I L ------------..- .. -. ~- ----- ~--- ---- --- r i I I ~ ; ~ I I Hllblda i -~ I I - I wu.on ~ ~ t L.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r y Hp~isrd ~ T ran ~ • ' • • \ Upland ~ • eseeHns ~ o ~ o ~ • ~ ~ Fontana • Q ~ O ' • o~ P ®~ pjr C) I _ ~i ~ og °~ a ~~ ~ - o o ; 8th O M etrolink ~ O ._.. ""-.1~ ~ = O o VVo • • 1 i s • ~ a u. `A X41' _ -. Sen Barrrrdlno Ontarb Within 112 Mite of Transit • 108 - 359 Workers ~ 360 - 851 Workers • 852 -1,661 Workers • 1,882 - 2,871 Workers Outside 112 Mile of Transit • 108 - 359 Workers ~ 360 - 851 Workers • 852 -1,861 Workers • 1,662 - 2,871 Workers ~ Metrolink Station Omnitrans Fixed Transit Routes General Plan - Commercial/Office - Industrial - Mixed Use Figure 3-2 Transit Accessibility to Employment Centers 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 53 P-176 RANCHO ~;UCAMONGA ~~ ~ J , ' ~ _ . ; `. ~ L ----••- •-• ---• -- ----- -..-..--- ~ -••--- . ~ ~..1; ~ ~ 1 ~ L_.. ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 _ --T .J - - ~ ' tan Mbir.~,d ,~ -~ -- \ Up land w. I V I ~ I Fontana - - Foatl~ c3 ul ~' .. - -- J i •.\ ~ _. ~ \ ~ ' S ~ g ~ ~ ,~ s s~ a~~ Ontario - Omnitrans Fixed Transit Route Metrolink Station Area of Community within 1!2 Mile from Omnitrans Route Concentrations of Low and Moderate Income Households Figure 3-3 Transit Accessibility to Residential Neighborhoods 54 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-177 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT POLICY The City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to creating a viable urban community, with decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities. This assessment includes all parts of the community such as public improvements, public facilities, public services, and economic development. This section highlights each focused neighborhood qualifying for enhanced assistance as well as some of the proactive efforts to expand fair housing opportunity. Based on 2000 Census data there are 9 Low and Moderate Income Census Tract Block Groups, which can be grouped into 3 distinct Target Areas. Target Area 1 Target Area 1, known as Southwest Cucamonga, is bordered by Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, and the City boundary to the west and south. This Target Area includes 20,991 residents, of which 46 percent are low- modera[e income, and 45 percent are Hispanic. The Area includes 7,652 units, predominantly older single-family homes, and industrial uses. Many of the residential structures require routine to major rehabilitation work. Target Area 2 Target Area 2, located in southeasterly Cucamonga, is south of Foothill Boulevard and east of Rochester Avenue, extending to the Cityboundary to the east and south. The Target Area contains 1,472 residents, of which 44 percent are low and moderate income, and 42 percent are of Hispanic ethnicity. The Area includes 488 units, predominantly older single-family homes, and industrial uses. Many of the residential structures require routine to major rehabilitation work. A new workforce housing complex, built by the NHDC, with support from the RDA is under construction. Target Area 3 Target Area 3 is centrally located within the Cucamonga area of the City, is bordered by the 210 Freeway to the north, Base Line Road to the south, Haven Avenue to the east, and Carnelian Avenue to the west; an additional portion of the Target Area is located in the Red Hill area west of Carnelian Avenue and south of Base Line Road. According to the 2000 Census, the population character of this Target Area includes a total population of 15,411 persons, ofwhich 33 percent are low- and moderate-income, and 23 percent are of Hispanic ethnicity. The area contains 5,955 units consisting of a mix of older and relatively newer single-family homes, and several mobile home parks. Many of these residential structures require routine minor rehabilitation work, while some require major rehabilitation. Figure 3-4 on the following page shows the location of these areas. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 55 P-178 RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA 56 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Figure 3-4 Target Reinvestment Areas P-179 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Improvements to Improve Tazget Areas Although the specific needs differ throughout the target areas, these neighborhoods are generally in need of community facilities, parks, and recreation areas, infrastructure improvements, housing services, and community services. The 2010-2015 Consolidated Plan propose the following policies and programs to improve these target areas. Policy 4.3: Assist the NHDC First-Time Homebuyer Program. The City Redevelopment Agency will provide funds to NHDC to construct and rehabilitate homes and deed restrict them to very low income families (earning 45% to 60% of MFI) in the Northtown target neighborhood. Policy 5.2: Provide sewer connections to owner occupied, single-family, lower and moderate-income homeowners in southwest Rancho Cucamonga. The program will offer a zero interest, deferred payment loan of approximately $16,000 to $21,000 to eligible households. Policy 10.1: Support improvements in qualified target areas that include street reconstruction, new sidewalk additions, and repair [o existing sidewalks throughout target neighborhoods. Policy 16.2: Support the City's Code Enforcement and Graffiti Removal Program operating in qualified target areas. Effective graffiti removal functions to alleviate conditions ofslum andblight in target neighborhoods. Additional policies and programs can be found in the City's Redevelopment Implementation Plan, Housing Element, and other City plans. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 57 P-180 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 4. Fair Housing Status This chapter provides an overview of the housing industry in governing fair housing practices of its members, fair housing services available to residents in Rancho Cucamonga, and recent fair housing complaints and concerns. A. Homeownership Market Part of the American dream involves owning a home in a safe neighborhood Housing advocates have recently focused increasingly on near community amenities. Homeownership is believed to enhance one's advertisements that include sense of well-being as it provides a sense of security and belonging. discriminatory references or Homeownership helps residents accumulate wealth through the preferences for certain types of appreciation of a home over time. Homeownership is often a means to tenants. These include: strengthen neighborhoods, because residents with a greater stake in their . Adults preferred community will be more active in decisions affecting their future and • Perfect for empty nesters community. Whatever the reason, ensuring fair housing is an important • Conveniently located near a way to improve the quality of life of residents and the community. Catholic church . Ideal for married couples 1. OVERVIEW OF HOME BUYING PROCESS without children Purchasing a home is a challenging process. The time required to find a home, the major legal and financial implications surrounding the process, the number of steps required, and financial issues to be considered are overwhelming to the would-be homeowner. Not only is the process costly, but fair housing issues may arise in many ways during the process. Discriminatory practices can occur in the following steps during the homebuying process. These are: 1) advertising homes; 2) the lending process; 3) appraisal process; and 4) real estate agents and sellers. Advertising The first step in buying a home is to search advertisements in magazines, newspapers, or the Internet for what the market offers. Advertising has become a sensitive issue in the real estate and rental housing marketbecause it may indicate preferences for certain tenants. Recent litigation has held publishers, newspapers, multiple listing service, real estate agents, and brokers accountable for discriminatory real estate advertisements. Advertising can be discriminatory if it suggests a preferred tenant, publishes in only certain languages, or restricts the media or locations for advertising. The key is whether the advertisement appeals to one segment of the population and unduly alienates other groups from seeking the same home. 58 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-181 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Lending Practices Initially, buyers must locate a lender that will qualify them for a loan. Lenders will review prospective borrowers based on a credit check, income level, assets, and the like. Discrimination can occur if lenders treat equally qualified individuals in a different manner, giving different loan terms, preferred rates, denying a loan based on a factor not related to ability to pay and risk, or treating minorities in harsher terms such as initiating foreclosure if any payment is late or by making loans at terms that encourage defaults. Credit history ofren determines the interest rate and type of loan. Applicants with high credit scores ofren receive conventional loans, while those with lower to moderate credit ofren use government- backed loans or subprime loans, many of which have higher interest rates on the loans as a result of being perceived as a higher risk to the lender. Appraisals Banks order appraisal reports to determine whether a property is worth the amount of the requested loan. Generally, residential property appraisals are based on the comparable sales prices of properties surrounding the neighborhood of the subject property. Other factors such as structure age, condition, and location, are considered. Homes in some neighborhoods with higher concentrations of minorities or poverty may appraise lower than similar properties in neighborhoods with lower concentrations due to crime and declining neighborhood attractiveness. This causes lower property values in a given neighborhood, restricting the amount of equity and capital available to those residents. Lower appraisals due to discrimination can make it exceptionally difficult to secure a loan to finance normal improvements to a property. Real Estate Agents and Sellers Finding a real estate agent is normally the next step. Real estate agents may intentionally or unintentionally discriminate by steering a potential buyer to particular neighborhoods; others may choose not to show the buyer all choices available. Agents may also discriminate by who they agree to represent, who they turn away, and the comments they make about clients. Even if an agent follows fair housing practices, a seller may not want to sell his/her house to certain people protected under Fair Housing laws. The Residential Listing Agreement and Seller's Advisory forms that sellers must sign disclose their understanding of fair housing laws and practices of discrimination. Yet enforcement is difficult. Although a seller will usually choose the best offer in price, in a multiple offer situation, a seller could easily discriminate under the guise of other characteristics. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 59 P-182 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 2. REGULATORY OVERSIGHT Given the complex and far-reaching nature of the real estate industry, numerous government agencies are involved. Each organization has some responsibility for furthering fair housing. The organizations that exercise oversight and their policies, practices, and programs are described below. Association of Realtors The National Association of Realtors (NAR) is a consortium ofrealtors that represents the real estate industry at the local, state, and national level. NAR members must subscribe to its Code of Ethics and a Model Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan developed by HUD. The term "realtor"identifies a licensed real estate professional who pledges to conduct business consistent with the Code of Ethics. The California Association ofRealtors (CAR) is the statewide arm of NAR, and the Inland Valley Association of Realtors is the main association serving the City of Rancho Cucamonga and surrounding communities. Complaints involving agents or brokers may be fled with these associations. California Department of Real Estate The California Department of Real Estate (DRE) is the licensing authority for real estate brokers and salespersons. The DRE is responsible for investigating complaints alleging possible violations of the real estate law or the Subdivided Lands Law. DRE also monitors real estate licensees conducting business asmortgage lenders brokers. DRE has the authority to grant, suspend or revoke a license, issue a restricted license, or file an Order to Desist and Refrain. The DRE also publishes monthly a list of names of persons and businesses that are conducting real estate activities without a license. DRE also reviews Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for all subdivisions of five or more lots, or condominiums of five or more units to ensure that discriminatory language is not included. California Department of Insurance The California Department of Insurance is responsible for regulating the insurance business, investigating complaints against firms and individuals in the insurance industry, and protecting consumers. With respect to home insurance, the CDI, insurance industry, community economic development organizations, and advocates formed the California Organized Investment Network. This collaboration was formed in lieu of State legislation that would have required insurance companies to invest in underserved communities, similar to the federal Community Reinvestment Act that applies to the banking industry. The CDI also provides broad level industry and consumer protection for auto, life, and other types of insurance. 60 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-183 RANCHO ~,;UCAMONGA 3. HOUSING MARKET OVERVIEW Perhaps at no other time in recent memory has the residential housing market in southern California, not to mention the state, undergone such volatility as in the past five years. Fueled by historically low interest rates and unprecedented soaring of home values, tens of thousands of homeowners in Rancho Cucamonga took advantage of low interest rates to refinance their home loans. Tens of thousands of residents also purchased homes. Figure 4-1 shown below illustrates trends in home loans since 2003. 25,000 ^ Purchase Loans ^ Refinance Loans 20,000 ^ Improve Loans -- - 15,000 10,000 5,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Figure 4-1 Trends in Home Loans, 2003-2008 With seemingly endless inflation in housing values and prices, financial institutions offered increasingly creative loan packages to allow people to buy homes. "No down" variable-rate loan packages or adjustable rate loans (ABMs) became increasingly common. Once the national economy began to recede, housing values plummeted. For homeowners who recently purchased their homes with ARMS, many had insufficient equity to refinance variable rate loans. At the same time, rising unemployment rates also left homeowners with the inability to pay existing mortgages or ABMs. The combination of easy credit and market speculation eventually led to an unprecedented level of foreclosures. In 2009, foreclosures remain a key issue in Rancho Cucamonga. According to DataQuick, 1,386 notices of default were issued to Rancho Cucamonga homeowners in 2007, 2,195 in 2008, and 1,278 in the first five months of 2009. During this period, foreclosures increased from 425 homes in 2007 homes to 1,125 homes in 2008, to a projected 941 in 2009. Although the market is showing signs of recovery as of 2010, half of the homes advertised today are short sales or foreclosures. 2010-2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 61 P-7 84 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Loan Disposition by Tract Characteristics Analysis of home mortgage loans is ofen used to identify the outcomes of the lending process-what type of loans were approved and denied, the characteristics of borrowers, and where buyers purchased their home. Various statistical techniques are often used-including simple statistics, chi-square tests, or more formal linear regression models. Whereas none of these statistics can prove equal opportunity or discrimination, [hey do provide an indication of characteristics and trends that may suggest further study, testing, or targeting of local government programs. Table 4-1 shows the number of home loan applications and percentage of loans originated (lender-approved loans and applicant-approved loans). For conventional loans, a higher percentage of upper income applicants had loans originated than middle-income applicants-a finding consistent with expectations that income is a key factor in securing an approved loan. The data also showed that, when income is held constant, tracts with a medium percentage of minority households seemed to have lower loan origination rates as a whole compared against tracts with a low percentage ofminorifies. With respect to government-backed FHA loans, the differences in loan origination rates among similarly situated tracts were largely erased. Moreover, applicants with FHA financing also had significantly higherloan origination rates than those who applied with conventional financing. This could be because prospective buyers, under the FHA terms, are better risks for lending institutions as they are backed by the Federal government. In this light, [he differences in loan origination rates among buyers with conventional financing raises fair housing questions that may merit study. Home Table 4-1 No. of I Percent Tract Characteristics ~ Applicant ~ Originated ~ Applicant ~ Originated Income Upper (120%+MFI) 1,921 55% 570 62% Middle (81-120% MFI) 336 46% 187 63% Lower < 80%MFI N/A N/A N/A I N/A Minority 20-49% oftract 1,778 55% 510 61% 50-79%oftract 479 47% 247 65% 80% plus tract N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 3,014 53% 757 62°/a Source: FFIEC. 2008 62 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-185 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Loan Disposition by Household Characteristics Fair housing concerns tend to arise when similarly situated applicants have different lending outcomes. For instance, if two applicants (Asian and Black) had similar incomes, one would generally assume that they had the same chance of securing a loan, all other things being equal. Ifthat is not the case, these differences could raise questions about whether the difference in loan outcome is a fair housing concern or whether other differences (such as credit scores) account for the difference. Table 4-2 displays lending outcomes by race/ethnicity and income level. With respect to home mortgage loans, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data show the lowest loan origination rates among low income buyers (with the exception of Hispanics) but the highest loan origination rates were for middle-income applicants. Among each group, Asians and Whiles had the highest loan origination rates. For home refinancing, middle income households had the highest origination rates. Across all three categories, Asians and Whites had the highest loan origination rates. Table 4-2 Race and Total % Total % Total Ethnicity Loans Origin. Loans Origin. Loans Origin. Home Purchase Asian 31 48% 78 60% 378 55% Black 11 55% 18 61% 109 47% Hispanic 47 60% 134 49% 455 49% N/A 27 41% 76 54% 352 52°/a White 76 46% 256 71% 1,014 59% Refinancing Loans Asian 11 36% 53 36% 227 39% Black 22 18% 52 44% 195 25% His anic 120 32% 233 30% 631 28% N/A 78 37% 157 39% 577 37% White 168 42% 354 48% 1,276 49% Source: FFIEC, 2008. As in past years, HMDA patterns for 2008 were more unpredictable. Black and Hispanics typically have the lowest loan origination rates as in past years, but the pattern was not universal across all income categories. This also could be because the HMDA data show that the vast majority of Asian applicants did not choose to use FHA-backed products, which typically have a higher loan origination rate than all other products. Other anomalies in the data could not be explained. As the housing and lending market further stabilize, additional inquiry should be done. 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 63 P-186 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA B. Rental Housing Market Many residents of Rancho Cucamonga will not choose to purchase homes. In some cases, a household may be seeking to build up financial reserves. In others, households may wish to downsize and seek rental accommodations. Still in others, new residents may seek temporary accommodations during transitions in employment. Regardless of the reasons, providing a wide range of rental accommodations and ensuring fair housing opportunities for renters are important to improve the quality of life in the community. This section describes the process of seeking rental housing and highlights complaints in Rancho Cucamonga that raise fair housing concerns. 1. OVERVIEW OF HOME RENTAL PROCESS Finding a suitable home to rent, although not as financially challenging as a home purchase, is still a challenging process. Quality apartments can be hard to find and affordable single-family residences even harder to find. Moreover, fair housing issues may arise in many ways during the process. Discriminatory practices can occur in the following steps during the home renting process. These steps are: 1) advertising of rentals; 2) viewing the unit; 3) qualifying for the lease; 4) administration of the lease terms; and 5) dealing with issues that arise over the course of tenancy. Advertising The main sources of information on rentals are newspaper advertisements, word of mouth, signs, apartment guides, the Internet, and apartment brokers. Publishers, newspapers, and Internet sites have been increasingly held accountable by advocates and the courts for discriminatory ads. Advertising can suggest a preferred tenant by suggesting preferred residents, using models, publishing in certain languages, or restricting media or locations for advertising. Advertisements cannot include discriminatory references that describe current or potential residents, the neighbors, or the neighborhood inracial/ethnic terms or other terms suggesting preferences. Viewing the Unit Viewing the unit is the most obvious place for discrimination because landlords or managers may discriminate based on race or disability, or judge on appearance whether a potential renter is reliable or mayviolate any of the rules. For example, if a student is wearing a T-shirt with a heavy metal band on the front design, a landlord may fear that loud music willbe played. If a prospective tenant arrives with many children, the landlord may be concerned that the children may disturb other renters. The prospective tenant may have an accent or wear religious symbols or jewelry that maybe deciding factors on whether the landlord prefers to rent the unit. 64 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-187 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Qualifying for the Lease Qualifications for the lease vary among apartment owners. Landlords may ask potential renters to provide credit references, lists of previous addresses and landlords, and employment history/salary. The criteria for tenant selection, if any, are typically not known to those seeking to rent. An initial payment consisting of first and last months' rent and security deposit are typically required. To deter "less than desirable" tenants, a landlord may ask for a higher initial payment or security deposit. Tenants may also face differential treatment when vacating the units. The landlord may choose to return a smaller portion of the security deposit to some tenants, claiming excessive wear and tear. Administration of the Lease Most apartments are rented under either a lease agreement or amonth-to- month rental agreement. A lease is favorable from a tenant's point of view for two reasons: the tenant is assured the right to live there for a specific period of time and the tenant has an established rent during that period. Most other provisions of a lease protect the landlord. Information written in a lease or rental agreement includes the rental rate, required deposit, length of occupancy, apartment rules, and termination requirements. Typically, the lease or rental agreement is a standard form completed for all units within the same building. However, the enforcement of the rules contained in the lease or agreement may not be standard for all tenants. A landlord may choose strict enforcement of the rules for certain tenants based on arbitrary factors, such as race, presence of children, or disability. Since the recent escalation of housing prices throughout California, complaints regarding tenant harassment through strict enforcement oflease agreements as a means of evicting tenants have increased. During the Tenanry During tenancy, the most common forms of discrimination are based on familial status, race, national origin, sex, or disability. Usually these types of discrimination appear in differential enforcement of rules, overly strict Hiles for children, excessive occupancy standards, refusal to make a reasonable accommodation for handicapped access, refusal to make necessary repairs, eviction notices, illegal entry, very frequent rent increases, or harassment. These actions may be used as a way to force undesirable tenants to move on their own without the landlord having to make an eviction. In some cases, landlords have the ability to raise rents as frequently as possible if not in conflict with a lease agreement, State law, or done in retaliation. 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 65 P-188 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA 2. RENTAL HOUSING COMPLAINTS The City contracts with IFHMB to answer landlord/tenant questions and pursue fair housing complaints. Table 4-3 summarizes the types of fair housing complaints received by the IFHMB since 2001. The primary cause of discrimination complaints have historically been based on the race and ethnicity of the complainant. Beginning in the mid 2000s, the trend in fair housing complaints has generally shifred to issues of disability. The demographics of the complainants generally mirror the population of Rancho Cucamonga. Whites make 42 percent of the complaints. Blacks and Hispanics make 29 percent and 24 percent of the complaints, respectively. Lower income households typically account for approximately 80 percent of all complaints, which is expected given that moderate income and above households typically own homes. Table 4-3 Fair Housing Complaints, 2000-2008 Fi scal Year Causes 07/08 06/07 05106 04/05 03104 02103 01102 Income Source 2 2 0 0 1 1 6 Age 1 4 1 4 6 2 2 Race 2 27 19 16 27 16 22 Sex 1 7 3 0 0 4 3 Marital Slalus 0 2 3 0 0 3 3 Ancestry 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Color 0 1 0 0 5 0 2 National Origin 1 5 8 12 5 8 15 Familial Status 0 13 4 5 0 10 13 Disability 11 54 24 32 19 28 13 Religion 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Sexual Orientation 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 Total 19 118 64 69 65 73 79 Major Causes Race/Color/Natnl 3 35 27 28 37 24 39 Disability 11 54 24 32 19 28 13 Familial Slatus - 13 4 5 - 10 13 Other 5 16 9 4 9 11 14 Source: Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, 2009. To some degree, the change in the type ofhousing discrimination inquiries is not due to a new trend or increased levels of discrimination against one or more groups. Rather, an increase in discrimination could reflect an evolution in fair housing law, the passage of new laws, and/of an expanded application of law to circumstances faced by people. As society acquires a greater understanding of the subtleties of personal and societal bias, either through court decisions or personal experience, notions of what "discrimination" and "fair housing" aze will change. 66 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-189 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 3. FAIR HOUSING SERVICES Typically, fair housing services include the investigation and resolution of housing discrimination complaints, discrimination auditing/testing, and education and outreach, including the dissemination of fair housing information such as written material, workshops, and seminars. Landlord/tenant counseling services involve informing landlords and tenants of their rights and responsibilities under the California Civil Code and mediating conflicts between tenants and landlords. The City of Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) to provide fair housing and landlord/tenant services. Services provided by the IFHMB include the following. Education Fair Housing education is a major component of IFHMB's program, with a goal of providing the knowledge of fair housing to all partners of the housing industry. Fair Housing outreach is provided through radio programming, mass media, brochures, workshops, and the IFHMB Web site. IFHMB also holds a community presentation and workshop as part of the National Fair Housing Month each year. Senior Services The IFHMB mediates conflicts between seniors and Social Security, Medi- cal, utility companies, collection agencies, neighbors, and other parties in dispute. The IFHMB provides a Care Referral Service and assistance with HEAP and Homeowner/Renter Assistance. A list of senior housing and board and care homes is maintained and available. Home Counseling The IFHMB offers various counseling services to homeowners residing in client communities. This includes first-time homebuying education, prebuying counseling, mortgage default counseling, and reverse equity mortgage counseling for seniors. In recent years, the IFHMB has been focusing on conducting hundreds of counseling interviews each year to address foreclosures in the region. Enforcement The IFHMB works in partnership with HUD and the State Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) to address potential fair housing issues for its clients. In addition to answering routine landlord-tenant inquiries, the IFHMB undertakes detailed case resolution services. Services include landlord-tenant mediation, prelitigation mediation services, alternative dispute resolution services, and mobile home mediation services. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 67 P-190 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Fair Housing Complaints and Testing After a person calls IFHMB with a complaint, an interview takes place, documentation is obtained, and issues are discussed to decide on the course to proceed. Mediation/conciliation is offered as a viable alternative to litigation. If the mediation/conciliation is successful, the case is closed afrer a brief case follow-up. Ifthe mediation/conciliation is unsuccessful, the case is referred to DFEH or HUD. If during case development further investigation is necessary, testing maybe performed. Once the initial investigation is completed, the complainant is advised ofthe alternatives available in proceeding with the fair housing complaint. As mentioned earlier, options include mediation/conciliation, administrative filing with HUD or DFEH, referral for consideration to the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Housing and Civil Enforcement Section, or referral to a private attorney for possible litigation. Once the complaint has been referred, IFHMB monitors the case to its final outcome. The following graphic is a simplified presentation of how the IFHMB addresses fair housing concerns in Rancho Cucamonga. Call to IFHMB Case DeuelopmeM Testlng ~ ~ Refenal ~ ~ Mediation/Condliatlon HUD F+~ DFEH DOJ ~~ PduateAltomey Figure 4-2 Process for Resolving a Fair Housing Complaint With respect to statistics and trends, the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board referred an average of approximately 25 referrals to HUD or DFEH annually in FY 2001/2002 and FY 2002/2003. Since then, however, caseload has significantly declined; an average of eight cases are referred to DFEH or HUD each year with very little variation among the years. 68 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-191 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4. REGULATORY OVERSIGHT Many agencies oversee [he apartment rental process and related practices. These organizations provide fair housing services and education to property owners and tenants regarding their rights, responsibilities, and other regulatory and enforcement matters. The primary organizations involved include the California Apartment Association and Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire, State Department of Employment and Fair Housing, and the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board. Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire The Apartment Association of the Greater Inland Empire serves the east San Gabriel V alley and Inland Empire. The Association has more than 1,000 members and publishes a monthly magazine, AGGIE. The Association provides a wide variety of educational courses and workshops, including the Certificate in Residential Management. This course provides training in the fundamentals of rental property management including specific coursework in fairhousing and ethics. AGGIE alsoprovidesinformation overthephone and referrals regarding fair housing issues. California Association of Realtors CAA is the country's largest statewide trade association for rental property owners and managers. Incorporated in 1941 to serve rental property owners and managers throughout California, CAA represents rental housing owners and professionals who manage more than 1.5 million rental units. CAA has developed the California Certified Residential Manager (CCRM) program to provide a comprehensive series of courses geared toward improving the approach, attitude, and professional skills of onsite property managers and other interested individuals. The CCRM program consists of 31.5 hours of training that includes fair housing and ethics. California Department of Employment and Fair Housing The Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) is [he largest state civil rights agency in the country. It was established by the legislature in 1959 as the Division of Fair Employment Practices and was initially part of the Department of Industrial Relations. DFEH is charged with enforcing California's comprehensive employment, housing, public accommodations and public service nondiscrimination laws, and the state's bias-related hate violence law. DFEH's statutory mandate is to protect the people of California from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations. DFEH provides technical assistance to employers and housing providers regarding their responsibilities under the law, investigates discrimination complaints, and pursues litigation. 2010-2015 Malysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 69 P-192 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA C. Hate Crimes and Harassment The goal of fair housing is more than simply ensuring housing opportunity. More broadly, fair housing is intended to also promote inclusive, diverse communities of choice-where families can choose to live, where housing and schools are stable and well supported, where employment is accessible, and where all racial and ethnic groups and persons with disabilities are an integral part of the community. The absence of violence in our community contributes to this goal. This section examines this topic in greater detail. 1. HATE CRIMES AND INCIDENCES Hate crimes are violent acts committed against people, property, or organizations motivated by the group they belong to or identify with. Hate crimes become a fair housing concern when residents are intimidated or harassed at their residence or neighborhood, and therefore cause an environment of fear so people will not consider moving into certain neighborhoods, or leave for fear of harassment or physical harm. State law defines hate crime as a criminal act committed, in whole or part, because of the actual or perceived characteristics of the victim-disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or association with a person of group with one or more of these actual or perceived characteristics. The State Fair Housing Act and Federal Fair Housing Act makes it a crime to threaten, harass, intimidate, or act violently toward a person who has exercised their right to free housing choice. However, a hate incident should not be confused with a hate crime. A hate incident is an action or behavior that is motivated by hate but is protected by the First Amendment right to freedom of expression. Examples of hate incidents can include name calling, epithets, distribution of hate material, and the display of offensive hate-motivated material. This type of behavior, though offensive, occurs every day in all communities. The freedom guaranteed by the US Constitution allows hateful rhetoric as long as it does not interfere with the civil rights of others or escalate to a crime. According to the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI, there have been no reported hate crimes in Rancho Cucamonga in many years-an unexpected finding given the sheer size of the community. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department staff confirmed this finding, but also noted that hate crimes are sometimes not reported to them or, if they are, they could be inadvertently reported under broader categories of crimes. This type of problem exists in many cities today. Therefore, the AI recommends that City staff work with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department to examine and verify that recordkeeping is adequate in this regard. 70 2010-2015 Analysis of Impetliments to Fair Housing Choice P-7 93 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA 2. SCHOOL HARASSMENT In recent years, schools have experienced rising levels ofviolence that have become of considerable concern to parents. V iolence at school is no longer confined to inner cities but is widespread, affecting communities of every size, location, and demographic. Indeed, perhaps a better measure of success of a safe and inclusive community is not only the absence of hate crimes and incidents, but also the absence of such harassment a[ public schools. As a large community, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently served by five different school districts: • Etiwanda Schaol District provides 12 elementary and 4 intermediate schools serving northeast Rancho Cucamonga. • Central School District provides five elementary schools and two middle schools serving central Rancho Cucamonga. . Alta Loma School District provides eight elementary schools and two middle schools serving northern Rancho Cucamonga. • Cucamonga School District provides two elementary schools and one intermediate school serving central Rancho Cucamonga. . Chaffey]oint Union High School District serves students from Ontario, Montclair, Rancho Cucamonga, and other cities. In response to an epidemic of harassment and violence at schools across the country, the California State Legislature passed the California Student Safety and Violence Prevention Act of 2000. This landmark act prohibits discrimination and harassment at public schools on the same grounds used to define hate crimes under California law. The intent of the law is intended to not only decrease the amount ofviolence and harassment, but also the growing epidemic of suicides caused by malicious behavior of students. The California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS) is a comprehensive youth risk- behavior and -resilience data collection service for all California schools. Every school district in California is required to conduct the survey in order to comply with the No Child Left Behind Act, Title IV, of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301). The CHKS provides local schools and communities with data to identify the needs ofyouth and to guide efforts to meet [hose needs. Among other topics, this survey asks the following questions about the prevalence of harassment at schools. • Whether students have been harassed due to their race/ethnicity, disability, religion, sexual orientation, or other characteristic • The degree to which students have experienced bullying • Whether or not students are affiliated with a gang To what degree students feel safe at school. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 71 P-194 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Measures of School Harassment As shown below, nearly one-third of a117`~-grade students are harassed by other students, which is consistent with the statewide average. Typically, harassment is most frequent in the intermediate school years as children are dealing with unique pressures, such as puberty, growing influence of peers, and other concerns. By 9`s and lla' grade, however, students attending Rancho Cucamonga school districts are harassed at much lower rate than experienced in schools across the state. 35% ^ Rancho Cucamonga (2007) 30% 25% 20% 15% Figure 4-3 Proportion of Students Harassed at Local Schools Table 4-4 shows that one-third of students experience harassment each year. Race and ethnicity are the most common reasons for student harassment, accounting for 17% to 26% of all harassment claims. About 1090 of students also report harassment for religious beliefs, gender, and sexual orientation. Regardless of the reason for bias or the severity of the incidence, these statistics underscore the problem of harassment at public schools. Table 4~3 Percentage of Students Harassed School District Basis of Harassment Etiwanda Alta Loma Cucamon a Central Chaffe Race/Ethnicity 22% 18% 26% 18% 17% Religion 12% 8% 11% 11% 9% Gender 12% 12% 10% 12% 9% Sexual Orient 10% 13% 8% 13% 8% Disability 7% 5% 5% 7% 5% Total 33% 32°k 34% 33% 24% Source: Healthy Kids Survey, 2007. 72 2D10-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 7th Grade 9th Grade 11th Grade P-7 95 RANCHO GUCAMONGA D. Program Evaluation An important part of fair housing planning is reporting on the progress made and accomplishments inachieving the goals and objectives contained in the 2001Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing. This analysis helps indicate which housing programs are no longerneeded, programs that need to be modified, and whether new programs need to be introduced. Expanding Housing Opportunity (Actions 1-3) The 2001 AI recommended three actions to improve housing opportunities. These were: 1) continue to provide homeownership opportunities by promoting the First Time Homebuyer Program; 2) continue to facilitate the development of affordable housing throughout the community, and 3) develop a "HMDA-like" monitoring system of the Redevelopment Agenry's lending practices for the First Time Homebuyer Program. Outreach for these programs was to be targeted to minorities in multiple languages. The City contracts with Neighborhood Housing Services of the Inland Empire to provide homebuyer counseling for its First-time Homebuyer program. The City recently completed and helped finance several affordable family and senior projects listed in this AI. Projects are distributed throughout the community, within and outside of target aeeas, to avoid impaction. Marketing targets minorities and low-moderate income buyers. This is now an ongoing program and no current impediment remains. Rehabilitation Assistance (Actions 4-6) The 2001 AI proposed to continue to provide rehabilitation assistance for owner occupied and investor-owned single-family housing and multiple- familyhousing inthe community. Furthermore, the AI recommended that information about these programs is provided in Spanish and English. Bilingual staff should also be available regazding code enforcement, housing rehabilitation, and other housing services. These initiatives are now ongoing programs in the City's housing element. As part of the draft 2010-2015 Consolidated Plan, these efforts are also being focused in three targeted areas (low-moderate and minority concentrations) toimprove housing opportunities for residents living there. This is now an ongoing program and no current impediment remains. Access to Information (Action 7) The 2001 AI proposed to The City will expand its website to provide additional links to housing services and resources, such as fair housing servicers and others. Through separate contracts, the City contracts with IFHMB and NHSIE to provide the lead for such services. This issue is no longer considered an unaddressed impediment. 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 73 P-7 96 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Public Policies (Actions 8-9) 1'he 2001 AI proposed that the City provide developers with Eederalfair housing guide information regarding accessibility requirements as part of [he land entitlement process. The City may also consider incorporating accessibility compliance as part of the entitlement process. The AI also proposed that the City continue to pursue affordable housing development opportunities identified in the 2000-2005 Housing Element. With the adoption of the 2007 California Building Code, the City has adopted the latest ADA requirements that comply with Federal and State fair housing and accessibility requirements. Developers aze required to show compliance with these statutes as part of the application process. The City continues to pursue affordable housing projects as required by State housing element and redevelopment agenry law. This is no longer an impediment. Outreach to Lenders (Actions 10-12) The 2001 AI proposed that the City increase outreach to lenders in three ways: 1) work with local lenders and government entities to provide outreach, in English and Spanish, to lower income residents about government-backed financing; 2) encourage lenders, particularly local lenders, to hold bilingual home buying workshops in the city; and 3) explore regional effort to study predatory lending issues and support State and Federal initiatives to address predatory lending practices. The City has established contracts with NHSIE and Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board to address these recommendations. This is no longer an impediment. The City also supports regional efforts to study predatory lending and much has been published in recent years. Fair Housing Services (Actions 13-15) The 2001 AI recommended that the Fair Housing Service Provider continue to conduct fair housing workshops for residents, apartment owners, and property managers. Encourage coordination with real estate associations. In addition, they will monitor complaints regarding unfair lending and assess lending patterns using the HMDA and other data sources. Finally, the City will work with a fair housing service provider to perform more tests. Under the City's contract with the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board, the agency is required to perform all of the above tasks. Progress is reported on a periodic basis to the City and annual results are tallied and included in the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. 74 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-197 RANCHO ~UCAMONGA 5. Fair Housing Plan Previous chapters of this AI examined changes in Rancho Cucamonga during the 1990s, analyzed public policies for impediments to fair housing, and documented fair housing in the community. Building upon the prior analysis, this chapter draws conclusions and makes recommendations to improve housing opportunity in Rancho Cucamonga. A. Summary 1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS The City of Rancho Cucamonga has undergone significant population growth, increasing by more than 20,000 residents during the 2000s as master planned communities were constructed. This population growth has brought forth changes in the City's population, including a growing minority population (Hispanic, Black, and Asian), an increase in baby boomers and echo boomers, and a proportional increase in special needs households. These demographic changes present new challenges to fair housing. Rancho Cucamonga's housing market has dramatically changed since 2000. Following nearly a decade in unprecedented increases in housing prices and rents, the economic downturn and financial markets have caused the housing market to plummet. Foreclosures are at an all-time high and those who purchased overvalued homes during the market runup are paying very high cost burdens that exceed more than 30 percent of their income. These changes place a difficult burden on special needs groups, such as seniors, families, homeless people, people with a disability, and others. 2. PUBLIC POLICIES AND IMPEDIMENTS An important part of furthering fair housing is to analyze public policies that may contribute or detract from fair housing opportunities. Public policies refer to land use regulations, housing policies, transit accessibility, and other factors that may potentially impact housing opportunity in the community. This 2010-2015 AI report includes an analysis of land use and zoning policies, development policy, housing policy, and local government services to identify actual and potential impediments to fair housing. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is known for its provision of a broad range of housing opportunities for residents in all walks of life. The careful attention to planning the community has resulted in an exceptional quality of life afforded to those who live, work, and visit the community. This AI 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 75 P-198 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA study concluded that several policies, programs, and administrative practices directly or indirectly limited fair housing opportunity in the City. Provisions of the Municipal Code that need to be updated include the provision of housing opportunities for people who are homeless, definitions used in the growth management procedures and senior housing overlay, and other technical clarifications within the development code. Transit services need to be adjusted to cover underserved areas in the City. 3. HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES Part of the American dream involves owning or renting a home in a safe neighborhood near community amenities. Rancho Cucamonga enjoys a homeownership rate of 68 percent-a remarkable statistic for a city its size. Analysis of HMDA data indicates that lending outcomes are higher for Whites and Asians and lower for Blacks and Hispanics, even after controlling for differences in household income. Lending patterns are influenced by financial institutions, but the persistence ofa gap is a concern. Because many households cannot afford housing, ensuring adequate rental housing opportunities and fair housing remain important goals. During the past seven years, the Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board has assisted hundreds of residents with landlord/tenant issues. In past years, complaints due to discriminatory treatment based on race and ethnicity were the top concern. In recent years, complaints based on disability status have supplemented race and ethnicity as the primary fair housing concern. This is due in part to the changing legislative context of fair housing. 4. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS Rancho Cucamonga is noted as one of the safest communities of its size. With respect to fair housing, there have been no reported hate crimes in nearly a decade. Rancho Cucamonga's schools are known to be much safer in comparison to schools throughout the County and State and in fact, are one of the key reasons that residents move to Rancho Cucamonga. The fact that the City has no reported hate crimes and has relatively lower school violence confirms that these issues are not impediments to fair housing in the City. Although improvements are suggested in safetyprograms, the City maintains a strong reputation for being afamily-friendly community. 76 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-199 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA B. Housing Plan Rancho Cucamonga is a progressive community with respect to the provision of a range of housing opportunities and its proactive stance to ensure the fair treatment of people in the rental, sale, occupancy, and financing of housing. The following recommendations are offered to continue advancing fair housing opportunities in Rancho Cucamonga. 1. CHANGES TO DEVELOPMENT CODE The California Legislature has passed new statutes to facilitate and encourage the development of housing for homeless people. The Government Code requires that jurisdictions specify at least one zone where a year-round emergency shelter can be permitted as a by-right use. Transitional housing and permanent supportive housing must also be treated like any other residential use in the same zone and are subject to the same regulations as other residential uses located in the same zone. The draft 2008-2014 Housing Element proposes to allow emergency shelters as a by-right use in the General Commercial (GC) Zone with development and operational standards as allowed under State law. The Housing Element also proposes to permit transitional and supportive housing serving up to six clients like residential care facilities as a by-right use in all residential zones. For larger facilities serving seven or more clients where the use operates like multiple-family projects, such uses will be permitted where multiple-family projects aze permitted. • Timing: One year afrer adoption of the Housing Element • Responsibility: Planning Department 2. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION The Federal Fair Housing Act and California Fair Employment and Housing Act impose an affirmative duty on local governments to make reasonable accommodation in building codes, zoning/land use regulations, and administrative practices to afford disabled persons an equal opportunity to use a dwelling. In 2001, the State Attorney General also issued a letter encouraging local governments to adopt a reasonable accommodation procedure. Housing Element law also now requires local governments to affirmatively Curther fair housing for people with disabilities. Rancho Cucamonga has an active program to make its facilities, programs, and services accessible [o residents. For housing projects, the City also already has the mechanisms in the municipal codes (e.g., administrative exceptions) to make reasonable accommodations. However, HCD will require more affirmative action as a prerequisite for approval of the housing 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 77 P-200 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA element. The drafr 2008-2014 Housing Element therefore includes a program to create a reasonable accommodation ordinance that would specify the process for obtaining a accommodation and required findings. . Timing: One year after adoption of the Housing Element • Responsibility: Planning Department 3. PERMITTING PROCESSES The City's residential growth management review system has been an effective tool for ensuring high quality development. All residential projects are required to adhere to "absolute policies" intended to ensure neighborhood compatibility, compliance with adopted plans, adequary of public facilities and services, and protection of the public environment and public health. Moreover, each project must adhere to residential development standards and design guidelines to ensure project livability. The review system does not limit the number of units that can be built. Exemptions to the growth management review system are allowed for developments involving four units or less, land divisions involving four lots or less, and also government-subsidized senior citizen housing projects. Fair housing law discourages treating the approval of housing projects differently based on the intended occupants of the project. The current system gives a preference (in the form ofan exemption) for affordable senior housing, while affordable family housing projects must adhere to the growth management review system requirements. To avoid a potential fair housing concern in treating projects differently based on intended occupants, the exemption should be extended to affordable family housing or deleted. . Timing: One year after adoption of the Housing Element . Responsibility: Planning Department 4. SENIOR HOUSING OVERLAY The Senior Housing Overlay District offers incentives to encourage the development of affordable housing for seniors earning up to 80 percent of MFI. The Development Code defines a senior household for purposes of this overlay and the incentives granted under it as a married couple in which at leas[ one spouse is age 55 or over or an unmarried household in which all members are age 55 or over. The Development Code provides incentives such as required onsite parking, fee waivers/reductions, and a density bonus if the project complies with Slate density bonus law. 78 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-201 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Fair housing law discourages treating the approval of housing projects or granting of incentives differently based on the marital status of occupants. There does not appear to be a clear rationale for why marital status should be a distinguishing factor in how a senior development project should qualify for incentives. The State density bonus law provides for such incentives, and marital status is not a prequalification. To avoid a potential fair housing concern, the City may wish to eliminate the clause related to marital status so as not to constrain housing choices for seniors. • Timing: One year after adoption of the Housing Element • Responsibility: Planning Department 5. TRANSIT SERVICE Accessibility to public transit is a factor in housing choice for many households, especially lower income and senior households that may have limited or no access to a personal vehicle. For these households, access to public transit can be critical for employment and necessities such as grocery shopping, health care, and other routine activities of daily life. Transit agencies that receive federal funds must demonstrate that no persons are subject to discrimination in the level and quality of transportation services and/or transit-related benefits based on protected status. Omnitrans has developed a grid service network with routes spaced at one- mileintervals, resulting in generally equitable transit service coverage, with most urban areas of the San Bernardino Valley within '/z mile of a transit route. ADA-complementary pazatransit service is provided within'/, mile of a scheduled regular transit route in accordance with Federal regulations. Residential areas north of the I-210 and several employment centers south of Arrow Route need additional transit coverage. The City should work with Omnitrans to incorporate these route adjustments as part of their 2014 update to the short-range transportation plan. . Timing: FY 2012 (in time for the next SRTP update) • Responsibility: Planning Department 6. FAIR HOUSING COMPLAINTS Historically, the primary reason for housing discrimination complaints were race and ethnicity of the tenant. Beginning in the mid 2000s, the trend shifted to disability. This trend is not due to increased levels of discrimination but instead on a series of court decisions and expanded application of these court decisions to everyday life. For instance, new court decisions have made it clear that housing providers must be significantly 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 79 P-202 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA more proactive in making reasonable accommodations to people with a disability (e.g. such as allowing preferred parking for parking spaces). As communities acquire a greater understanding of the subtleties of personal and societal bias, through either court decisions or personal experience, notions of "discrimination and fair housing" will change. To keep up with the latest trends, the City should work with the IFHMB to adjust its public education programs, as needed, to focus on issues affecting people with disabilities. This may come in the form of outreach, posters, brochures or other media. It is unclear whether this will be a new initiative or a redirecting of current resources. • Timing: FY 2012 (as part of update to IFHMB contract) • Responsibility: Planning Department 7. FAIR LENDING PRACTICES Fair housing concerns tend to arise when similarly situated applicants have different lending outcomes. Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data show the lowest loan origination rates among low income buyers (with the exception of Hispanics) but the highest loan origination rates were for middle-income applicants. Black and Hispanics have the lowest loan origination rates as in past years, even after controlling for differences in household income. Whereas these statistics do not prove equal opportunity or discrimination, they do provide an indication of characteristics and trends that may suggest further study, testing, or targeting of local government programs. While many studies point to the need to work with lending institutions to improve equal lending outcomes for homebuyers, the fact that the actual lending is done at locations quite far away from Rancho Cucamonga. The RDA administers a First Time Homebuyer program, which makes available up to $80,000 to income eligible applicants citywide and contracts with Neighborhood Housing Services of the Inland Empire (NHSIE) for homebuyer education. To address the potential of equal lending outcomes, the City could work through NHSIE to implement strategies in this regard. • Timing: FY 2011 (as part of update to their contract) • Responsibility: Planning Department 8. HATE CRIMES Hate crimes are violent acts committed against people, property, or organizations motivated by the group they belong to or identify with. According to the Uniform Crime Reports published by the FBI, there have 80 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice P-203 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA been no reported hate crimes in Rancho Cucamonga in many years-an unexpected finding given the sheer size of the community. San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department staff confirmed this finding, but also noted that hate crimes are sometimes not reported to them or, if they are, they could be inadvertently reported under broader categories of crimes. This same type of problem exists in many cities today. Therefore, the AI recommends that City staffwork with the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department to examine and verify that recordkeeping is adequate in this regard so that the number of hate crimes can be accounted for. • Timing: Ongoing as part of annual contract negotiations • Responsibility: Planning Department, City Manager 9. SCHOOL VIOLENCE Rancho Cucamonga is known for its safe and high performing schools. In recent years, schools across the country have experienced rising levels of violence that have become of considerable concern to parents. Although Rancho Cucamonga schools are safer than most, still more than one in five students report being harassed every year due to their religion, disability, race/ethnicity, and other protected class. This AI therefore recommends that the City work with the Police Department to help augment the school resource officer program, develop model programs (e.g., Building Bridges Program developed by the Orange County Human Relations Commission), or pursue other innovative efforts. • Timing: Ongoing • Responsibility: Planning and Community Services Departments 10. RECORDKEEPING Local governments are required under fair housing law to keep and maintain appropriate records so that fair housing issues can be identified and effectively addressed through appropriate interventions. During the course of this study, certain data needed to diagnose potential concerns (e.g., hate crimes, landlord/tenant complaints, etc.) was not available. Although the costs of data acquisition and maintenance can be very high, the City should look into modifying contracts with their service agencies [o ensure that the appropriate type of data are readily available. • Timing: FY 2012 (as part of update to IFHMB contract) • Responsibility: Planning Department 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice 81 P-204 RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA C. Signature Page I, hereby certify that this 2010-2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the City of Rancho Cucamonga represents the City's conclusions about actual and potential impediments to fair housing choice, as well as actions that will be implemented to address them. Mayor, Dr. Donald Kurth, MD. Date 82 2010.2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice jZANCxo CUCAMONGA P-206 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTTSENT RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Cathy Morris, Planning Specialist Subject: ETIWANDA DEPOT NATIONAL REGISTER DESIGNATION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive the staff report and file for future reference. GENERAL: Staff would like to announce the submission of the City's application requesting designation to the National Register of Historic Places, the Pack Electric Etiwanda Depot, to the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. BACKGROUND: The Depot is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue in the center of what was a thriving agricultural community. This single-story structure of poured concrete was built in 1914 as part of the Pack Electric Rail Line: The architecture is an excellent example of local Mission Revival Style and was designed by architect Irving Gill. The Depot site is adjacent to our newly completed, successful Rails to Trails project and is being developed as a regional trailhead to include restrooms, parking, and picnic facilities, as well as an interactive train museum for historical displays. The museum would acknowledge the importance of the Pacific Electric Rail system in the development of Southern California. The Depot has already been designated a Local Landmark and we are now submitting our application for the Depot to be added to the National Register to the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUMMARY: On April 28, 2010, staff presented an update to the Historic Preservation Committee on the National Register Designation of the Etiwanda Depot. The Commission found the proposed designation appropriate. Respectfully submitte9 d 0 ~~ //i( James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:CM/ge Attachments: Exhibit A -Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit B -Site Plan Diagram Exhibit C -Photographs of the Depot EXHIBITA l Y m Zi-~--~ ~J./ ~ ~ 3 ~~~~ ~>:~~a;i s ~~~ ~~~p~ ~€ Fri y~~~~ ~~ r~ ~~ ~=s ~~~ ~a ~~ ~ ~ ~x ~~~ ~~s bd~Y ~~ A ~~ a~~ ~Z i ~g I ~a ~ w 9 oN S w 0 U ~ o Y~ W Q ~~ U 0~' U ~ a~~ a z 3 ~- w +t~jf ~~`~. P-ZO7 P-208 E--- E~MIBIT B ,~ ~ ~ a~ N W i g~~L~! <~~a°.N jj S1 ti [WJ„ wFf R ~i K~ ~ YW#S~. Qjy2JJJyy... ~~jjjy~~~o~o~ d ~^tiU ~ 4 D ~ W ^g~~_ d 1e<na ~p i ~a«~5 ~~ ~ 0 €~6 ; F ~ h~ U o ^n ~ t d, ~ ~ Q ,~L ~ ~ 5 t ~ U~! a ~~ J ~ d s ~~ ~ 2 ~~ O ~ ~ ~' ~ U ~~ t% O~ ` U w ~K d tr v o Qw ~ ~d w c~ a 0 z J d W H 8 ~. :.~ P-209 Etiwanda Depot - 1950 _}~ ~ f e. ~; }',4~ :~ EXHIBIT C Etiwanda Depot - 1914 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 2, 2010 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manag By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Minerva Gamboa, Business License ordinator P-210 r ~~'.~ ~ ~~=; J .~- jZANCxo CUCAMONGA Subject: INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOLICITATION, AND AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council introduce for first reading an ordinance adopting regulations applicable to solicitation and amending Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Currently, solicitors are required to obtain a solicitors permit at a flat tax rate with.no background check required. This could result in individuals with a prior conviction for misdemeanor or felony charges, such as Penal Code Section 290 which requires mandatory registration as a sex offender, soliciting the unaware public. At the February 4, 2009 City Council meeting, completion of a background check was added as a requirement for curb numbering services as part of Chapter 8.36 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Municipal Code. The proposed amendment to Title 9 of the Municipal Code would add the same requirement to noncharitable solicitation activities. This will provide consistent oversight of individuals directly soliciting the public. The background check will be required for noncharitable (i.e., commercial; not benefitting any charity) solicitation activities only. The City cannot require a background check for charitable solicitation per prior court decisions. (Charity is defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 17510.2(d)). Charitable solicitation is a protected First Amendment activity. A city may serve the substantial interest of protecting the public from fraud and crime in the solicitation of funds, but it must do so by using the most narrowly drawn regulations designed to serve those interests without unnecessarily interfering with First Amendment freedoms. Fraudulent solicitation is already a crime (Penal Code, Section 532b). The section of the attached ordinance pertaining to the denial of the issuance of a permit based on the results of the background investigation is considered by the courts to be unconstitutional as overbroad for charitable solicitors. Thus, these provisions will only be applicable to noncharitable solicitors. P-211 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO SOLICITATION, AND AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ~4-27-10 DRAFT The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Chapter 9.31 of Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby repealed, provided that such repeal shall not affect or excuse any violation thereof occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 2. Anew Chapter 9.31 is hereby added to Title 9 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 9.31 "SOLICITATIONd "Sections: 9.31.010 Definitions and general restrictions. 9.31.020 Noncharitable solicitation. 931.030 Charitable sohcitation. 9.31.010 Definitions and general restrictions. A. As used in this chapter: "Public place" means a place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, and includes, but is not limited to, any street, highway, sidewalk, parking lot, plaza, transportation facility, school, place of amusement, park, playground, and any doorway, entrance, hallway, lobby and other portion of any business establishment, an apartment house or hotel not constituting a room or apartment designed for actual residence. "Solicitation" or "solicit" means: (i) Any request, plea, demand, or invitation, or attempt thereof, to give money or property for any purpose, without prior invitafion, appointment or consent, made upon any private property in the city in which the solicitor has no possessory or ownership interest; or (ii) the sale of, offer to sell, or attempt to sell, for consideration of any kind, and for any purpose and without prior invitation, appoinhnent or consent, any advertisement, advertising space, book, card, chance, coupon device, magazine subscription, membership, merchandise, ticket of admission, or any other thing upon any private property in the city in which the solicitor has no possessory or ownership interest; or (iii) the act of traveling from house to house, from business to RC-ordinance -solicitation P-212 business, or otherwise from place to place, and taking or attempting to take orders for the sale of goods or merchandise, personal or intangible property of any nature for future delivery, or for services of any kind to be famished or performed in the future, whether or not such person has, carries or displays for sale a sample of the subject of such sale or is collecting advance payments for such sales or services; or (iv) the act of traveling from house to house, from business to business, or otherwise from place to place, carrying, conveying or transporting goods, merchandise or personal or intangible property of any nature, and offering and/or displaying the same for sale or making sales and delivering such items, or services of any kind, to any person at the place of sale or elsewhere; or (v) the act of traveling from house to house, from business to business, or otherwise from place to place, for any purpose and without prior invitation, appointment or consent, and offering to sell, or attempting to sell, for consideration of any kind, any goods or merchandise, personal or intangible property of any nature, or any kind of sernce. "Solicitation" does not include the distribution of free literature, flyers or leaflets. Solicitation is subject to the provisions of Section 5.04.350 of this code. "Street, highway and sidewalk" shall have those meanings as set forth in Sections 360, 509 and 55~, respectively, of the California Vehicle Code, or any successor provisions. thereto. B. It is unlawful for any person(s) physically present in or on a street or highway to solicit the occupant(s) of any vehicle traveling upon any street or highway. T1ris section does not prohibit solicitation by persons off the street or highway or on a sidewalk. C. No person shall engage in `aggressive solicitation' in any public place. `Aggressive solicitation' shall mean the following: 1. Approaching or speaking to a person; or following a person before, during or after soliciting, asking, verbally confronting or begging, if that conduct is intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to fear bodily harm to oneself or to another, damage to or loss of property, or to otherwise be intimidated into giving money or other thing of value, or where such conduct is intended to intimidate any person from lawfully utilizing any public service or facility; 2. Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with another person or an occupied vehicle without that person's consent in the course of soliciting, asking or begging; 3. Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid physical contact; RC-ordinance -solicitation P-213 4. Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person solicited either before, during, or after soliciting, asking or begging; 5. Persisting in closely following or approaching a person, after the person solicited has been solicited and informed the solicitor by words or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited or does not want to give money or any other thing of value to the solicitor; or 6. Using profane, offensive or abusive language before, during or after solicitation, that is inherently likely to provoke an immediate, violent reaction. D. No person shall solicit at the location of any residence from the time of sunset in one day to the time of sunrise the next day. E. No person under the age of 16 may solicit unless accompanied by an adult. 9.31.020 Noncharitable solicitation. A. Permit required. It is unlawful for any person to engage in commercial solicitation activities as a noncharitable solicitor within the city without first obtaining a permit therefor in compliance with the provisions of this Section 9.31.020. For purposes of this section, the term "noncharitable solicitor" shall mean any person who solicits for any commercial or other purpose not intended to benefit nor benefiting, any "charity," as defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 17510.2(d), or any successor provision thereto. B. Application for permit. Applicants for a permit under this section shall file with the finance director a sworn application in writing on a form to be furnished by the director, providing the following: The name, birth date, and description of the applicant; 2. The permanent home address and full local and business address of the applicant and the applicant's employer, if any, and any business represented by the applicant; 3. A brief description of the nature of the business, the goods or services to be sold, proposed method of delivery, and any vehicles to be utilized in connection therewith; RC-ordinance -solicitation P-214 4. If employed, the name and address of the employer, together with credentials establishing the exact relationship; 5. The length of time for which the permit is desired, not to exceed one year; 6. A statement as to whether or not the applicant has been convicted of any misdemeanor or felony within the previous ten years, the nature of the offense, the date of conviction, and the punishment or penalty imposed therefor, or any misdemeanor or felony for which the applicant is required to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290; 7. A statement as to the nature and date of any revocation of any permit held by the applicant to sell goods or services to the public within the previous ten years; 8. Evidence of the applicant or applicant's employer possessing a current city business license to conduct solicitation activities; Where the applicant is a business entity utilizing noncharitable solicitors, the applicant shall provide all of the required information as to such business entity and as to each person who shall actually solicit. C. Permit filing fee. At the time of filing the application for a permit under this Section 9.31.020, a fee in an amount established by resolution of the city council shall be paid to the finance director to cover the cost of investigation of the facts stated therein, and the cost of the identification card required to be carried by each solicitor. Such fee shall be paid by each business entity applicant on behalf of each person who shall actually solicit. D. Application investigation-Permit issuance conditions. 1. Upon receipt of a complete application for a permit under this chapter, the finance director shal] cause an investigation of the applicant and application to be made. The finance director shall require the applicant to submit to LiveScan or similar fingerprint means of identification and verification of information provided. The application shall be approved or denied within thirty (30) days of receipt, unless the finance director determines that additional time, not to exceed thirty (30) additional days, is required to complete the investigation due to circumstances beyond the director's control. In the event background information required to be obtained from the Department of Justice or other State or federal agency has not been received as of the end of the second thirty (30) day period, the finance director may issue a conditional, temporary thirty (30) day. permit pending receipt of the background information. The temporary permit RC-ordinance -solicitation 4 P-215 shall expire upon the issuance of an amoral permit, receipt of information establishing grounds for denial of the permit, or at the end of the thirty (30) day permit teen, whichever occurs first. 2. If, as a result of such investigation, the finance director determines that any ground for denial set forth in Section 9.3L020 F.1 exists, the applicant shall be provided written notice that the application is disapproved and that no permit will be issued. 3. If, as a result of such investigation, the applicant is found to satisfy the requirements of this chapter, the finance director shall approve the application and issue a permit and an identification card for each solicitor. Such card shall contain the signature of the issuing officer, and shall show the name and business or residential address of the permittee, the kind of goods or services permitted to be sold thereunder, the date of issuance and the term of the permit, as well as a description of any vehicle to be used by a permitted solicitor. Each card shall also cleazly state that issuance of such permit and identification card does not constitute an official endorsement by the city of the perrnittee or of anything sought to be sold by the solicitor. No permittee shall sell or attempt to sell goods or services of a different nature than described in the permit. Each permittee shall provide written notice to the finance director of any changes occurring with respect to information set forth in an application made pursuant to this chapter, within five (5) business days thereof. 4. The finance director shall keep a written record of all permits issued for such time as required by law. 5. Each permittee shall comply with the provisions of Section 9.3 ] .O10 of this Chapter, with respect to the manner of solicitation. E. Possession of permit required. Each permitted solicitor shall maintain in his possession, at all times while soliciting, the original identification card and a valid driver's license, identification card or other form of identification bearing the solicitor's name and photograph, and shall exhibit the card and picture identification to each prospective customer or ]aw enforcement officer for inspection upon request. F. Permit denial and revocation. 1. Any permit applied for under the provisions of this chapter maybe denied for any of the following causes: (a) Fraud, misrepresentation or false statement contained in the application for a permit; RC-ordinance -solicitation P-216 (b) Conviction of a misdemeanor or felony involving fraud, theft, dishonesty, or injury to any person, within the previous ten yeazs, or revocation of any permit to sell goods or services to the public within the previous five years, or.any misdemeanor or felony for which the applicant is required to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290; (c) Failwe to comply with the requirements of this Chapter; (d) Convrction within the pevtous';twelve (12) months; resulfingtfrom any vtolation ofthis Chapee; 9i3_l: 2. Any permit issued under the provisions of this chapter may be suspended or revoked after notice and hearing opportunity, for any of the following causes: (a) Fraud, misrepresentation or false statement made in the course of solicitation activities; (b) Any violation of this code or any state or federal law while soliciting that is punishable as a misdemeanor or felony, provided that substantial evidence of the fact of violation is found to exist; (c) Conducting solicitation in such a manner as to constitute a threat to the health, safety or general welfare of the public; (d) Conviction of a misdemeanor or felony involving fraud, theft, or dishonesty, or use of illegal drugs or injury to any person while soliciting, or which requires the permittee to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290. 3. Unless suspension is required in order to protect the immediate health, safety or welfare of the public, a hearing shall be conducted prior to permit revocation, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 9.31.030 D of this chapter, applicable to revocation of charitable solicitation permits. G. Appeal procedure. Any person aggrieved by denial of a permit may appeal such denial in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.31.030 E of this Chapter, applicable to denials of charitable solicitation permits, provided, however, that a nonrefundable fee in such amount as maybe established by resolution of the city council shall be paid by the appellant at the time of filing such appeal. 9.31.030 Charitable solicitation. RC-ordinance -solicitation P-217 A. Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in this Section 9.31.030, shall be defined as follows: 1. "Charity" means and has that definition set forth in Califor~»a Business and Professions Code Section 17510.2(d), or successor provision thereto, which defines "chanty" as including "any person who, or any nonprofit community organization, fraternal, benevolent, educational, philanthropic, or service organization, or governmental employee organization which, solicits or obtains contributions solicited from the public for charitable purposes or holds any assets for charitable purposes." Whenever the term "charitable purposes" is utilized in this chapter, such term shall mean and include such purposes as will directly benefit or are purported to benefit any charity. 2. "Solicitor" means any person who solicits. B. Chartable solicitation permit required. 1. No person shall solicit, or permit or cause any other person to solicit on said person's behalf, where it is represented that any proceeds of such solicitation are to be used for charitable purposes, or otherwise engage in any "solicitation for charitable purposes" or "sales solicitation for charitable purposes," as those terms are defined in California Business and Professions Code Section 17510.2, or any successor provision thereto, without first obtaining and being the holder of a valid charitable solicitation permit issued by the finance director. The fee for such permit shall be in such amount as may be set by resolution of the city council and which will compensate the city for the actual costs of the permit and identification cazd(s) required to be in the possession of each solicitor at all times while soliciting, and the cost of administering this chapter. Applicants providing proof of being orrepresenting anon-profit organization, association or other entity and exempt from the payment of taxes pursuant to Section 501 (c}(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or Section 23701d of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, or any successor provision, shall not be required to pay said fee. 2. The foregoing permit shall be required only of the person in charge of charitable solicitations on behalf of a charity, but no person shall solicit as agent, servant or representative of an unpermitted person required under the provisions of this section to have a charitable solicitation permit. 3. Each person applying for a charitable solicitation permit or renewal of an existing permit shall file with the fmance director a sworn statement setting forth the name of the charity on which behalf the charitable solicitation is to be made, together with the address and telephone number of the charity (and if an organization, the names and business addresses of its officers); the name of the RC-ordinance -solicitatiov P-218 person or persons who aze to act as charitable solicitors; the total amount to be raised; the estimated total amount to be expended as compensation or reward for such charitable solicitation, or the percentage of the total amount intended to be raised or realized in the drive or campaign such estimated total of expenditures represents; and the purpose for which the money or property derived from such chazitable solicitation is to be used. This statement shall be verified by declazation or affidavit of the person, or chief officer of the organization, for whom charitable solicitation is to be made, or if solicitation is to be for an unorganized class of persons, verification shall be made by the person in charge of such charitable solicitation. To the extent not required above, each applicant shall also provide to the finance department as part of the sworn statement of the information required to be disclosed pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 17~ l 0.3, the name and address of each person who shall actually solicit for charitable purposes. This sworn statement shall be on such form as provided by the finance department and shall constitute the required application. Notwithstanding the foregoing, provided none of the information given in comiection with an application for an initial charitable solicitation permit has changed, an applicant for renewal shall only be required to verify the same under penalty of perjury and pay the required permit fee. 4. Before issuing a charitable solicitafion permit, the finance department may investigate the information provided in the application. Unless upon such inquiry or from such statement the finance department discovers any false material statement or representation, or that the applicant does not represent a bona fide charity, as defined herein and in California Business and Professions Code Section 17510.2, or that the solicitation activities proposed would violate any provision of California Business and Professions Code Section 17510 et seq., or any other law, or that the applicant has been convicfed within the previous tweivgi(12), months of soliciting without a permit required by this, Chapter, the application shall be approved. Each complete application for a charitable solicitation permit shall be approved or denied within fourteen (14) days of receipt or the application shall be deemed approved. The permit shall be valid for one yeaz unless revoked or renewed as provided herein. if denied, the basis for denial shall be provided in writing within seven (7) calendar days by mail to the applicant. 5. In accordance with the requirements of California Business and Professions Code Section 17510.3, upon commencement of any charitable solicitation, each charitable solicitor shall exhibit to the prospective donor or purchaser a card entitled "Solicitation or Sale for Charitable Purposes Card," or alternatively, a solicitation brochure, which card or brochure shall truthfully contain the following information: RC-ordinance -solicitation P-219 (a) .The name and address of the charitable campaign, each organization, or fund on behalf of which all or any part of the money collected will be utilized for charitable purposes; (b) If there is no organization or fund, the manner in which the money collected will be utilized for charitable purposes; (c) The amount, stated as a percentage of the total gift or purchase price, that will be used for charitable purposes; (d) If the charitable solicitor is a paid fundraisee and is paid a set fee rather than a percentage of the total amount raised, the card or brochure shall show the total cost that is estimated will be used for direct fundraising expenses; (e) If the charitable solicitation is not a sales solicitation for charitable purposes, the card or brochure may state, in place of the amount of fundraising expenses, that an audited financial statement of these expenses may be obtained by contacting the organization at the address disclosed; (f) The non-tax-exempt status of the organization or fund, if the organization or fund for which the money or funds are being solicited does not have a charitable tax exemption under both federal and state law; (g) The percentage of the total gift, donation, or purchase price which may be deducted as a charitable contribution under both federal and state law. If no portion is so deductible, the card or brochure shall state that this contribution is not tax deductible; (h) If the organization making the charitable solicitation represents any nongovernmental organization by any name which includes, but is not limited to; the term "officer," "peace officer " "police," "law enforcement," "reserve officer," "deputy," "California Highway Patrol," "Highway Patrol," or "deputy sheriff," or "firefighter," "firemen" or "fire deparment," which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of law enforcement or fire department or firefighting personnel, the charitable solicitor shall give the total number of members in the organization, including the name of their public agency employer, and the number of members working or living within the county where the charitable solicitation is being made, and if the solicitation is for advertising, the statewide circulation of the publication in which the solicited ad will appear; (i) If the organization making the charitable solicitation represents any nongovernmental organization by any name which includes, but is not limited to, the term "veteran," or "veterans," which would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of veterans, the charitable RC-ordinance -solicitation P-220 solicitor shall give the total number of members in the organization and the number of members working or living within the county where the solicitation is being made. This subsection does not apply to federally chartered or state incorporated veterans' organizations with two hundred or more dues paying members or to a thrift store operated or controlled by a federally chartered or state incorporated veterans organization. This subsection does not apply to any state incorporated community-based organization that provides direct services to veterans and their families and qualifies as atax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code and Section 23701(d) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code; 6. When the charitable solicitation is not a sales solicitation for charitable purposes, any charitable solicitor who receives no compensation of any type from, or in connection with, a solicitation by any charitable organization, may comply with the provisions of subsection B.5 of this section, by providing the name and address of the chazitable organization on behalf of which all or any part of the money collected krill be utilized for charitable purposes, by stating the charitable purpose for which the solicitation is made, and by stating to the person solicited that information about revenues and expenses of the organization, including its administration and fundraising costs, maybe obtained by contacting the organization's office at the address disclosed. The organization shall provide this information to the person solicited within seven days after receipt of the request. A charitable solicitor who receives no compensation of any type from, or in connection with, a solicitation or sales solicitation by a charitable organization which has qualified for a tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revcnuc Code, and who is eighteen years of age or younger shall be exempt from the provisions of subsection B.5 of this section; 7. Each charitable solicitor receiving money or property from any person as a result of any solicitation shall provide a written receipt to such person. This receipt shall indicate the amount of money or a description of property received, as well as the name, business or home address and telephone number of the charitable solicitor. The receipt shall also state whether or not the money or property received constitutes a state or federal tax deduction; 8. Each charitable solicitor, or the charity on whose behalf such solicitation is made, shall maintain full and complete written records of all money and property received as a result of the permitted charitable solicitation activities. Such records shall be available for review by the finance director, or designee, during normal business hours. C. Identification. RC-ordinance -solicitation 10 P-221 1. Each charitable solicitor who shall actually solicit shall be issued, and shall tnaintain in his/her possession at all times while soliciting, an original identification cazd and a driver's license, identification cazd, or other fonn of identification which bears the solicitor's name and photograph. The permit and identification card shall also state that issuance of such permit does not constitute an official endorsement by the city of the permittee or of the subject charity. 2. Solicitors shall display the permit and identification card to, and allow the same to be examined by, any and all persons to whom any solicitation is to be made, prior to the time of the solicitation, and to any law enforcement officer upon request. 3. A charitable solicitor soliciting on behalf of a charitable organization whose membership is comprised of at least fifreen members and at least seventy-five percent Rancho Cucamonga residents, shall be deemed to comply with this section provided each solicitor, while soliciting, is dressed in a recognizable uniform, or is bearing some other form of conspicuous identification, of such charitable organization. D. Revocation. Any charitable solicitation permit may be revoked or suspended by the finance director, pending a hearing, when there is probable cause to believe that any fraud or criminal act has been or is being committed by the permittee or agents thereof in connection with any permitted solicitation. In all other cases, where any petmittee is found to have included any material misstatement or misrepresentation in the application, the permit may be revoked or suspended after a hearing on the matter. When a hearing is to be conducted as provided herein; the finance director shall schedule such hearing to occur between seven and twenty-one calendar days, and shall provide notice by first class mail of such hearing to the permittee at the address set forth in the application on file. Said hearing shall be held before the city manager who shall bear the burden of proof and his or her decision shall be based upon written findings and shall be final. E. Appeal. Any person, business entity or organization aggrieved by a denial of a charitable solicitation permit may appeal to the city manager by filing a written request for an administrative hearing with the city clerk within thirty days after service of notice of the finance director's decision. The city manager shall beaz the burden of proof and no fee shall be chazged for such appeal. The decision of the city manager shall be final." RC-ordinance -solicitation 11 P-222 Section 3. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become operative and maybe enforced, commencing 180 days after the effective date. Section 4. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance aze severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2009. Mayor I, ,City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regulaz meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2009, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2009, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucatonga RC-ordinance -solicitation 12 STAFF REPORT P-223 GJMMUN[TY SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~`Yj~~ Date: June 2, 2010 RANCHO cUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION OUTLINING THE DESIGN PURPOSES, GOALS AND PARAMETERS FOR THE FUTURE VETERANS/ARMED SERVICES REFLECTION AREA AT CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the City Council approve the recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission outlining the Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters for the future Veterans/Armed Services Reflection Area at Central Park. BACKGROUND On February 18, 2010, the Park and Recreation Commission held discussions regarding the basic planning strategy for a future Veterans/Armed Services Reflection Area envisioned for Central Park. At that meeting, the Commission concurred with the overall strategy recommended by staff, which included the initial development of project goals and parameters. The Commission also expressed interest in appointing a Commission sub-committee on this project. At their regular meeting on March 18, 2010, Commissioners Morris and Ryerson were appointed to this sub-committee with Commissioner Pallotto serving as an alternate. Consistent with the original planning strategy, staff developed a document outlining the draft Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters to be used when planning the future Reflection Area. This document is intended to serve as the important planning foundation when the time comes to start discussing actual design ideas. Following the tried and true axiom that "form follows function", it is critical that the functions, or purposes, for the Reflection Area be detailed and approved before actual design begins. The same is true for specific design goals and parameters. On April 15, 2010 staff and the Commission sub-committee met with the Commander of local VFW Post 8680 Jerry Doll and local Veterans' advocate Jack Hayes to review the proposed Purposes, Goals and Parameters. Based on this discussion, a few minor modifications were made and all in attendance expressed their strong support for the plan. Also at that meeting, staff and the community leaders were able to identify a number of veterans' associated organizations to be invited to participate in future discussions regarding the proposed Reflection Area. On May 6, 2010" a meeting was held with the core planning group including the Commission sub-committee members and Commander Doll, as well as a representative from nine veterans' related organizations. These organizations included: P-224 CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2 ARMED SERVICES/VETERANS REFLECTION AREA JUNE 2, 2010 VFW Post 8680 • Alta Loma High School Veterans' Memorial Garden • Naval Sea Cadet Corp • U.S. Army Reserve • Marine Corp League • American Legion • Disabled American Veterans • Military Support Group of Calvary Chapel • Chaffey College Additional organization representatives were invited from the other community memorial sites, Blue Star Mothers, the USO and Christian Military Academy but they were unable to attend. Attendees at the meeting were extremely positive and supportive of the City's plan for a Reflection Area. Participants reviewed the proposed project Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters and offered a few minor modifications. The entire group felt that this planning document will be an ideal foundation for future discussions. Each group representative expressed their desire to remain involved in the process, and their willingness to encourage their members to participate in future design idea sessions. There was also a very positive energy amongst the groups, resulting in an interest in working together in the future to support veterans, members of the armed forces and their families. At this meeting, staff noted that there will be a need for the community to organize a fundraising effort to fund the reflection area. Each group representative was asked to think about what role their organization might play in the fundraising process, including taking the leadership role. The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed the final proposed Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters at their meeting on May 20, 2010 and unanimously recommended them for approval to the City Council. FINDINGS Attached as Exhibit #1 are the recommended Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters for the Veterans/Armed Forces Reflection Area at Central Park for City Council consideration. Again, this planning document is the result of staffs initial proposal which has been reviewed, enhanced and recommended by the core planning team and representatives from nine different veterans' organizations, as well as the Park and Recreation Commission. Once approved, this will serve as the planning foundation as discussion starts about actual design concepts. Following City Council approval of the Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters staff will schedule an open community meeting to solicit design ideas from all interested residents, including members from all involved organizations. Rancho Cucamonga based WLC Architects and Central Park landscape architects from RJM Design Group have generously agreed to provide conceptual planning services for this Reflection Area for no fee. These design professionals will help lead the community input meeting to obtain creative ideas. Following this community input meeting, staff will work with the core planning team and the architects to develop design concepts for future review and consideration. P-225 CITY COUNCIL ARMED SERVICES/VETERANS REFLECTION AREA JUNE 2.2010 PAGE3 CONCLUSION Staff requests that the City Council approve the proposed Design Purposes, Goals and Parameters for the future Veterans/Armed Services Reflection Area. Community Services Director Attachment: Exhibit #1 I:\COMMSERV1Council&BOards\City Council\Staff ReporN2010\Artned Forces Area 6.2.10.doc Exhibit #1 p_226 Central Park Veterans/Armed Forces Reflection Area Design Purposes: Create a space for quiet and individual reflection on the invaluable service the Armed Forces and Veterans have provided to our country throughout history. Create a meaningful and informative tribute to each of the individual branches of the Armed Forces (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guard). Create a moving and educational timeline- briefly describing the country's major wars/conflicts. Create a thoughtful and reflective tribute to symbolize all Veterans and members of the Armed Forces serving our country in the-past, present and future. . Acknowledge and reference the various Veterans' memorials within Rancho Cucamonga which pay tribute to individual community members who have served in the Armed Forces. Provide a place supplying information on community resources available for local Veterans and families. Accommodate the needs for American flag retirement ceremonies, Design Goals: Design shall be intended for use of the reflection area by local community individuals or small groups of people, and not as a space for special events or as a regional attraction. Reflection Area design will serve as a compliment to the many other Veterans monuments within the community which offer tribute to individual service members, and will not duplicate or compete with their purposes, Design shall serve as a positive compliment to other park uses, and will not restrict other users of the park in any way. Design will serve as an appropriate backdrop.. for park special events taking place in the adjoining special events grass area. Design shall blend naturally with the remainder of Central Park, using the approved Master Plan design palettes, materials and standards. Care shall be taken to protect existing landscaping and improvements. Design will allow for daytime and evening visits to the space from dawn until 10 p.m. daily. Design will include use of low maintenance, vandal resistant and sustainable materials, P-227 Desian and Construction Parameters: • Reflection Area improvements will be limited to the identified grass and colonnade space located between the two west wings of the Central Park Community and Senior Center (see space limit diagram). Construction must adhere to all public contract code requirements for labor, materials, etc. • All funding for the design and construction of the Reflection Area will be organized and raised by members of the community, as has been done with the other community memorials. . • To insure compliance with these design goals. and parameters, and to maximize the opportunity for fundraising success, total construction value for the Reflection Area improvements will be limited to a maximum of $50,000. -2- I:\COMMSERV\CENTRAL PARK\Veterans Plaza\Misc\Design.doc H V 0 LPL L a Q ~+ ~i _~ N ~~ J~' ,-a 1 c_l ~, ~, ~~ N O ~, O ~ v o v ~ V ~ ~ 0o a ~o ro ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 o a u~o ~ ~ ~ 3 a ~ ~ V ~ ~ o v ~ 41 d ~ i.. O 'p O '~= V ~ ~ ~O o ~ L Q ~ ~ ~~// .N _ i. N ~ ~ v ~ ~ +O' /V ~ ~ o ~, v +~ o ~ ~ ~ V o v N N ~ ~ by ~ vii t0 N i~ bU rC O N C in (O o -C „n Y ~C ~ o C i ~ V °' o~ o a o E v E •O c ~ N U1 ~ ~ V ~ > ~ O Q U1 > ~ +~ ~ o ra L v~ V ~ o v ~~ a ~~~~ ~~°~ ~o~ 0 o c :~' ~ In N ~ Q a~+ ~ f0 V 4J "D ~ f0 a-' Vl "Q N I ~ ,+~~ C V i i I C~ O~= o ~~ O o~ V a. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •L ~ a ~ a v ~ v °~'v ° Q ° no. C~ ~~ L~ I~, 4 6~ .._., v +_~ -° ~ ~ +' (D C N ~ N ~ ~ N d 4J V1 0 ~ N ~o ~a V a~ ~ o~ trot ~~ ~ ~3 'c v ~ ~a O aL L v~ o 1~ A V ~ O ~ t V ~ ~ •~ ~ .~ b 0 ~/ W i ~ O V v ~° ~ ° ~ •O ~ ~ L ~~ ~ v a ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ Q O N 0 .~ N Lo N L 0 v C a 0 +~ a N C f0 N v c ro Q .0 v 0 v a ra t V r0 (0 U 0 a 0 V 0 a a N v v 0 V v s V . . C v L .~ C v +~ v J Q a L Q V v fd V CJ fd Z v 4J a N a~ J d L 0 V a~ .~ • • • • Z ~ '!. a4 ~, s ra ~ ~ N ~ V ~ ~ ~ ~+= O ~ ~~ ~ . ~+ ~ L 0 3~ a, -~ ~ V ~ E ~ i i LO 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~ _ •E ~ a ~ a V 4J in ~ 0 ~ _V L o ~ ~ N o ~~~ ~, Y ~' v > ~ . _ V v~;° a ocNa a ~ a e ~~~ ~ ~ m r v ~-~ ~ .b_ .0 a ~ V ~ ~ ~ ° ~~ O 41 ~ ~ ~ I V O N"d Q1 ~ = N ~ N L .. 41 ~ C C ON ~ ~ ~ J a ~ o O >. ~ (p v ~ a ~' r~ ~ ~ ~` ~} ~~i L a i V cn ~+ V .~ L a ~, .~ ~~ . :. ~, a a J Q Z W V L a 0 ._ V O Q c~ L a C 0 :~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ Q N V O ~ ~ a. V r~ ~o o ~o ._ ._ ._ a~ a~ a~ D ~ ~ • • ~ C, :, L~ ~ ~~ l ~f 4 t v O L ~ -n N fU ~ C N O O ~ a-+ +~ V1 v N O (/~ ~ +~ +~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ L C +~ ~/~ Y/ _ ~L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ._ i ~ ~ ~ > ~ c ~ o E ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ L ~ ~ ~ L ~N ~ ~ N LL • w ~ ~ ~ ? ~ _ 4- ~ ~ ~ ~ L •~' ~ E E E ~ , .~ ~ r~ Q ~ ~ ~ r~ r~ ~ ~ ~ v +~ ~ v v ~ ~ ~ V V O V V ~ • ~ • • 1 ,~l ~~ ., , L~ _~ l.~ [~ l4 1!1!1!/////~ v .L O ~ v c ~ ~ ~, c E ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ .~ v ~ v v > ~ O `^ o ~- V ° '% O V ~ > ~ .N N ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q V1 ~ C L O ~ o ~ ~ C ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C a ~ ~ V ~ + + ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ ~ d1 ~ ~ N O ~ -v " E O C ~ C ~ O O ~ ~ N V Q .~ ~ ~ V Q • • ~ W •~ L1 V i~ i, ', ~~ ~~, ~~ a'[ ~ .,~, `~ ~.. ~.n. ~~ .. A N ~ a-+ • ~ O ~ N a ~ ~ O c a a ~J ~ L L a..i ~ ~ V ~ O N O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ Vf ~' ~ ~ N /~ .~ ~ • lV f~ O d •- V O v E ~ a v ~ o ~ a ~ ~ ° O ~ L v .~ L '++ ~ O a~ rv ~ ~ .~, v > a ~ ~ ~ L ~~ ~ ~ v N O ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L d--+ ~ t}.. O ~ +~ O f~ ..~ s ~ ~ u ~ a~ +~ ~ ~ Q O • ~ Y ,~ ~ • ~ ~ /~ ~ A l/~ VDU ^, W ~, • `}J O t v ~~ :~ z..~ - `~, ~~~ a t ~~ ~. V ca O L7 ~~ N L (~ L ~I-+ V ~- O .~ v .3 a--+ (~ _~~ .~ .~ -~ E a-+ L Q r~ c .~ N N f6 ~-.+ N .~ -~ v C .~ _~ 4- N N .~ ~+ (~ ,~ r w L Y / ~ L +~ .~..i c V /~R V ~ V fD a ~ +~ v 0 .~ ~ V ~' ~ o +~ L ~° Vf E ~ v 0 ~ V ' c a~ _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - ~+ .~ v O V V r~ L 0 v a 0 s (~ E 0 V L +~ v° ~ ~ f~ -a 'x ra N ~ .bA ~ ~ o L ., .~ o L o ~ N N vi _~ ~ ~ N ~cc _ ~ ~ C V = V .3 ~ ~ ~ ~ L o a ~o -_ c. L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ v ° ~ °~~ ~ o ~ 0 0 ~, ~ >, a +~ n~o ~ ~ ~ ._ .N 4-- ~ ~ L ~ ° .3 ~ ~ v L v a v ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ro ~ o ~, 'ate ~ n~o E ~ +, o ~ >+ O ~ V "a „Q U •N 7 c~ ~,~ ~, ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ Q '~ c ~ o 0 O °` 0 ~~ L~ ''. z` .~ c "` ~~ ` ~/ / 1~ J ~ N L ~. .,G "d L ++ 3 V ~ `^ -v .~, ~ ~ L ~ a ~ O V V '~ o ~' V ~ Q L ~ a ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ V /~ ~ QJ ~/ ~ V V r Q ~ ° i V ., o N ON d1 ~ C ~ ~ --~ --~ a a~ V O u 3 3 v ~ '> •~ ~ 0 L C ~, o o •~ v ~ N v° o ~ ~ +, v v ~ v v ~ ~ i ~ ~_ ~ r~ O L N ~ L ~ 0 ~ L o- ,,_, v ~ ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~N ~ v Q ~ O ~ v fa ~ ~ ~ C .~ ~ L L .D _bQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o .N a ~ ~ -° :~c o ~ o a .,_~ UJ v C .L O ° o 0 _ V ~U ~ ,C ~ - L ~ ~ V •~ ~ ~ _ ~ U ~ C ~ ~ V ~ ~ +~ O ~ ~ L ,,Q ~ v ~ o .~ N ~O O LJ O Z v P-228 STAFF REPORT - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT l RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the City Council Community Services Subcommittee's recommendation to re-appoint Antonio Karraa and Janet Ryerson to serve additional four-year terms on the Park and Recreation Commission. BACKGROUND: The terms of office for Park and Recreation Commission Chair Antonio Karraa and Vice Chair Janet Ryerson are due to expire at the end of June. Each of the Commissioner's has indicated their desire to continue to serve on the Commission and have submitted letters requesting their re-appointment. The City Council Community Services Subcommittee met on May 24~" to discuss the re-appointments and will present their full recommendation at the June 2nd City Council meeting. submitted, Kevin McArdle Community Services Director P-229 STAFF REPORT COD-QvIUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 2, 2010 C',UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION: To approve the recommendation of the Community Foundation Board of Directors and City Council Community Services Subcommittee to appoint Paul Gesiriech to serve afour-year term on the Community Foundation Board of Directors. BACKGROUND: Recruitment for expansion of the Community Foundation's Board of Directors. as set-out in the Board's Strategic Plan 2015, continues to be actively pursued. Most recently an application was received by Paul Gesiriech who had expressed an interest in serving on the Board. The Community Foundation's Board Development Committee conducted a brief interview with Mr. Gesiriech and recommended his appointment to the City Council Community Services Subcommittee at their May 24"' meeting. The Subcommittee concurred in support of the appointment and will present their full recommendation at the June 2"d City Council meeting. submitted, Kevin McArdle Community Services Director a x ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N 0 N N 2 ^ ti ~' cq ~i-- ~ .~ v ~ ~ cs ,~ L o ° ~ ~ SJ ~ ~ ~ SJ a o~ ~ 3' s S 3 0 ~ .~ ~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -' -Q L v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5J ~ ~ o ~ L ~ ~~ SJ ~°~ S ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~l ~ S ~ -IJ ~ ~ "s ~ ~ ~ -1J ~ an ~~ u1 ~ C $~ ~ ~ tQ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ °~ cn u~ ~ ~ L v ~ ~ A- ~ 3 ~- ~ ~ v ~ o '~ Q ~' S ~S . Z5 L ~~ m .L-~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ S S a~i v) ~' ~ ~s ~ ~°- ~ c°n o ~S ~- ~' .~ v O ~ v ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ i'' p '~ O ~ s, O A y c ~ v ti ~ W `~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I-~1 ~ °~ ~ ~"y d _ ~ ~ v ~ c~ ~ ' N ~ ~ ~ .,.., ~ V , O . p., °' z p ~ o ~' 'y c ~° '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v '~ ~ O ~ ,, b1p .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . v ~ ~ ~ ~ v O ~ ~ '~ a ~ O ~ .~ ,b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . cn ,o v ~ v w v ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ °~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~, o ~ ~ v o a ~ ~ 0 ' c n ~ ~ ~ ~ U W ~ ° ~ ~ V ~n rn 3 0 0 ,o v U v