HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011/04/20 - Agenda Packet~C~ANTyCHO (~UCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801
City Office: (909) 477-2700
AGENDAS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD
CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETINGS
1St and 3~d Wednesdays ~ 7:00 P.M.
APRIL 20, 2011
ORDER OF BUSINESS
CLOSED SESSION
REGULAR MEETING
Tapia Conference Room ................. 5:00 P.M.
Council Chambers ........................... 7:00 P.M.
MEMBERS
MAYOR
MAYOR PRO TEM
COUNCIL MEMBERS
L. Dennis Michael
Sam Spagnolo
William Alexander
Chuck Buquet
Diane Williams
CITY MANAGER
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY CLERK
Jack Lam, AICP
James L. Markman
Janice C. Reynolds
~ ~ '~~~.
,_
~j,~~~~ ~ INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
~/,',::'~Ii~~,~ i~~~.~,,tiuwun
TO ADDRESS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to
speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,
you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views
of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from
clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Agency, Fire Board or City Council byfilling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City
Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table
and at the City Clerk's desk. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or
not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. If as part of your presentation, you would like to display
audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. If you are present to speak on an
"Advertised Public Hearing" item, your name will be called when that item is being discussed. Comments are to be
limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of
individuals desiring to speak.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the
agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the
agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public
hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion
of the agenda has been completed.
Any handouts for the Agency, Fire Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution
AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS
Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, Public Library
and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table
during the Council meeting.
LIVE BROADCAST
Agency, Fire Board and Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access.
Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City
has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on-demand" from their computers.
The added feature of "Streaming Video On Demand" is available on the City's website at www.ci.rancho-
cucamonga.ca.uslwhatsnew.htm for those with Hi-bandwidth (DSUCable Modem) or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up)
Internet service.
The Agency, Fire Board and City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at
7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
Members of the City Council also sit as the Redevelopment Agency and the Fire District Board.
Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found at http:!lwww.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please
contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the
meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.
Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
~/~~~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
>,, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~~ ~~ ~ ~,~~,,,.::, APRIL 20, 2011
1
A. 5:00 P.M. -CLOSED SESSION
CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA ROOM
A1. Roll Call: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo
Councilmembers Alexander. Buquet and Williams
CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE CITY COUNCIL.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S~
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN
GILLISON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET
AND CONFER PROCESS -RDA, FIRE, CITY
D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE, IDENTIFIED AS SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL NUMBER 0208-153-05-0000; NEGOTIATING
PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR ECONOMIC AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND
BRIAN SMITH, LAMAR ADVERTISING, REGARDING TERMS OF AGREEMENT -RDA
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
F. RECESS
CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL
CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
r: ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,.,,~ ., ,. APRIL 20, 2011
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO
CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE
AGENCY, FIRE BOARD AND COUNCIL.
G1. Pledge of Allegiance
G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo
Councilmembers Alexander, Buquet and Williams
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
H1. Presentation of Certificate of Recognition to Coca Cola Distribution Center for their
recycling and environmental sustainability initiatives.
H2. Recognition of 2011 Library Telethon Hosts and Donors.
H3. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring May, 2011 as "National Fitness and Sports Month."
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency,
Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.
State law prohibits the Agency, Fire Board, or City Council from addressing any issue not
previously included on the Agenda. The Agency, Fire Board, or City Council may receive
testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by
the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications
are to be addressed directly to the Agency, Fire Board or City Council, not to the members of the
audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.
Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging
in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of
the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak
on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further
speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be
accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public
communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the
regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
~~~ `V' " T CT AND
FIRE PROTECTION DIS RI
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
,n : ; < <,,:,~~.,.:~:., APRIL 20, 2011
3
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial.
They will be acted upon by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without
discussion. Any item may be removed by an Agency/Board/Council member for
discussion.
.1. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
J1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 2011 (Regular Meeting
J2. Approval of Check Register dated March 30 through April 12, 2011, for the total amount of ~
$1,071,148.11.
J3. Approve to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2011. 2
J4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Foothill Boulevard 19
Entry Arches, to be installed at the east and west City limits on Foothill Boulevard, pursuant
to the Visual Improvement Plan and to be funded from 2004 Tax Allocation Bond Funds.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-007 2~
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
ENTRY ARCHES, TO BE INSTALLED AT THE EAST AND WEST CITY
LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
J5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of the 25
Hellman Avenue Master Planned Storm Drain and Street Improvements -Phase 2 from
Cucamonga Creek Channel to north of 8th Street, to be funded from Redevelopment
Agency funds.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-008 27
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HELLMAN AVENUE
MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS -
PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO NORTH OF 8T"
STREET, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
~. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
~-
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
r~ ~..;. < <,~ .;,,,,~, ,, APRIL 20, 2011
4
J6. Accept the Church Street Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to Hyssop Drive 31
project, Contract No. RA10-006 as complete, authorize the City to back-charge $7,357.22
from the remaining contract balance/retention and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice
of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $140,012.00.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-009 34
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE
CHURCH STREET PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER
AVENUE TO HYSSOP DRIVE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-006
AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
J7. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the 35
amount of $87,000.00 to the apparent low bidder, Scorpion Backhoe, Inc. (R,4 11-004/CO
11-047) of Hemet, California, to be funded from Acct. No. 1122303-5650/1778122-0 (South
Etiwanda Drainage) in the amount of $49,170 (includes bid amount of $44,700 plus 10%
contingency of $4,470) and funded from Acct. No. 2660801-5607 (2004 Tax Allocation
Bonds) in the amount of $37,830 (includes bid amount of $34,390 plus 10% contingency of
$3,440); authorize the appropriation of $14,170 Fund 122 (South Etiwanda Drainage) Fund
Balance and $7,830 from Fund 660 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) Fund balance.
J8. Approval to award the purchase of nine (9) vehicles to multiple Ford dealerships as follows: 37
One (1) to Theodore Robins Ford of Costa Mesa, California; two (2) to Fairview Ford Fleet
Center of San Bernardino, California; and six (6) from Raceway Ford of Riverside,
California, as per Request for Bid ("RFB") #10/11/010 in the amount of $317,966.11 from
Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund) and $30,455.49 from
Acct. No. 2520801-5604 (Sports Complex Fund); and approval of an appropriation in the
amount of $83,470.00 from Fund 712 Fund Balance (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement)
and $960.00 from Fund 520 (Sports Complex) Fund Balance to be used by the Public
Works Parks and Streets Sections.
K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
K1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 2011 (Regular Meeting)
K2. Approval of Check Register dated March 20 through April 12, 2011, for the total amount of 39
$371, 586.79.
K3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2011. 42
K4. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding (FD 11-001) between 47
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and Fire Management Group for the period
2011-2014.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
,_ ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~~ ~~~~~ < <,~~,~..~~-, APRIL 20, 2011
5
RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND THE FIRE
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES,
BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT FOR THE PERIOD 2011-14 48
L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL
L1. Approval of Minutes: April 6, 2011 (Regular Meeting)
L2. Approval of Check Register dated March 30 through April 12, 2011, and payroll ending 81
April 12, 2011, for the total amount of $5,136,889.67.
L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of March 31, 2011. 109
L4. Approval of a request from South Coast Air Quality Management (AQMD) for a Waiver of 121
Fees for use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on Friday, June 17 and Saturday, June
18, 2011, to conduct their Electric Lawn Mower Exchange Event.
L5. Approval of a request by Na Wong to implement the use of the Mills Act -Mills Act 122
Application DRC201 1-001 91, (Mills Act Agreement CO 11-045) - to reduce property tax for
the Emery house, a designated Historic Landmark located at 7403 Archibald Avenue -
APN: 1077-011-43.
134
RESOLUTION NO. 11-056
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
NO. 11-045 (ARTICLE 12, SECTION 50280 OF THE CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE) FOR THE HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY,
LOCATED AT 7403 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, APN: 1077-011-43
149
L6. Approval to receive Community Services Update Report.
L7. Approval of a single source vendor selection with T.D. Grogan Construction of Rancho
Cucamonga, for the installation of resilient playground surfacing at Central Park tot lot, 161
Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1605120-0 (Park Development Fund) for $36,772.83 (quote of
$33,429.83 plus a 10% contingency of $3,343), and the repair of playground resilient
surfaces at various other park locations, Acct. No. 1120305-5650/1764120-0 (Park
Development Fund) for $112,680.45 (quote of $102,436.45 plus 10% contingency of
$10,244); and authorize the appropriation of $6,773 from Acct. No. 1120305-
5650/1764120-0 (Park Development Fund) to Acct. No. 1120305-565011605120-0 (Park
Development Fund).
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
. ~ •~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA 6
-~~ ~ ~ < <,~:,^, ~~.~ ~ APRIL 20, 2011
L8. Approval to appropriate $57,168.00 to expend Homeland Security Grant Funds awarded to 162
the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department into the following account numbers: 1381701-
5200 (Operations & Maintenance) $5,336.00; 1381701-5215 (O&M/Computer Equipment)
$24,258.00; and 1381701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment) $27,574.00.
L9. Approval of an extension to Contract No. 08-158 to AEF Systems (AEF) to implement 165
Phase Two of the City's Intranet Project and to complete the Citizen Response
Management (CRM) System; authorize an expenditure increase in the amount of
$73,500.00 which will increase the total contract amount to $232,294.00; and approve an
appropriation into Account Number 1714001-5300 (Computer Technology Replacement
Fund) in the amount of $73,500.00.
L10. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the 170
amount of $341,000.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt (CO 11-
046), and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $34,100.00, for
the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Rochester Avenue to Juneberry Drive to be
funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 1176303-565011768176-0 and appropriate an
additional amount of $89,500.00 to Account No. 1176303-5650/1768176-0 from Measure I
fund balance.
L11. Approval to award the purchase of two (2) Dell PowerEdge R810 computer servers 174
including applicable maintenance, and Microsoft software to Sigmanet, Inc., of Ontario,
California, in the amount of $70,192.00, to be funded from the following accounts:
$5,820.00 from 1714001-5152 (Computer Software), $50 from 1714001-5300 (Contract
Services), $8,810.00 from 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment), $9,083.00
from 2624801-5152 (Computer Software), $26,429.00 from 2624801-5605 (Capital Outlay-
Computer Equipment), and the following Cops Secure Our Schools Grant Accounts:
$4,181.00 from 1373701-5152 (Computer Software), $30.00 from 1373701-5300 (Contract
Services), and $15,789.00 from 1373701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer) Cops Secure
Our Schools Grant.
L12. Approval to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the 176
amount of $87,000.00 to the apparent low bidder, Scorpion Backhoe, Inc. (CO 11-047/ RA
11-004) of Hemet, California, to be funded from Acct. No. 1122303-5650/1778122-0 (South
Etiwanda Drainage) in the amount of $49,170 (includes bid amount of $44,700 plus 10%
contingency of $4,470) and funded from Acct. No. 2660801-5607 (2004 Tax Allocation
Bonds) in the amount of $37,830 (includes bid amount of $34,390 plus 10% contingency of
$3,440); authorize the appropriation of $14,170 Fund 122 (South Etiwanda Drainage) Fund
Balance and $7,830 from Fund 660 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) Fund Balance.
L13. Approval of a Resolution adopting a Memorandum of Understanding (CO 11-048) between 178
the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Executive Management Group.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-057 179
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
AND THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP RELATIVE TO
WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF
EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
_ ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ,:~n„~».~.~ APRIL 20, 2011
7
L14. Approval to award the purchase of nine (9) vehicles to multiple Ford dealerships as follows: 194
One (1) to Theodore Robins Ford of Costa Mesa, California; two (2) to Fairview Ford Fleet
Center of San Bernardino, California; and six (6) from Raceway Ford of Riverside;
California, as per Request for Bid ("RFB~) #10/11/010 in the amount of $317,966.11 from
Acct. No. 1712001-5604 (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund) and $30,455.49 from
Acct. No. 2520801-5604 (Sports Complex Fund); and approval of an appropriation in the
amount of $83,470.00 from Fund 712 Fund Balance (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement)
and $960.00 from Fund 520 (Sports Complex) Fund Balance to be used by the Public
Works Parks and Streets Sections.
L15. Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District No. 2011-01 along Base Line 196
Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue.
198
RESOLUTION NO. 11-058
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UTILITY UNDERGROUND
DISTRICT NO. 2011-01 ALONG BASE LINE ROAD FROM CARNELIAN
STREET TO VINEYARD AVENUE, USING SCE RULE 20A FUNDS
L16. Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District No. 2011-02 along Arrow Route 199
from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-059 201
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UTILITY UNDERGROUND
DISTRICT NO. 2011-02 ALONG ARROW ROUTE FROM BEAR GULCH
PARK TO VINEYARD AVENUE, USING SCE RULE 20A FUNDS
M. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second
readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or
Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the
title. Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or
Councilmember.
M1. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00141 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
202
Consideration of a proposed amendment to Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment) of
Title 5 (Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations) and Chapters 17.10
(Commercial/Office Districts), 17.30 (Industrial Districts) and 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard
Districts) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
regarding entertainment. This action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to
Section 15061 (b) (3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
r. ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
~~ ~ < <.:.~,, ~..:, APRIL 20, 2011
8
ORDINANCE NO. 840 (second reading) 202
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2010-00141, A REQUEST TO AMEND CHAPTERS
5.12, 17.10, 17.30 AND 17.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING ENTERTAINMENT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
N1. CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 210
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES. FEES AND CHARGES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE
3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RESOLUTION NO. 11-060 211
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES
AND CHARGES PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND
AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
O. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORTS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
01. APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $187,330.00 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1016301-5300
(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL SERVICES FUND 016) AND APPROVAL 242
TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO 2011-041) WITH
PACIFIC MUNICIPAL CONSULTANTS (PMC) NOT TO EXCEED $187,330.00 FOR THE
PREPARATION OF A COMPREHENSIVE UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
(TITLE 17) AND REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NO. 10/11-204
02. APPROVAL OF THE SOURCES OF PAYMENT AND NECESSARY BUDGET 340
APPROPRIATION FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S
SHARE OF THE STATE BUDGET DEFICIT REDUCTION (SUPPLEMENTAL
EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION FUND) FOR FISCAL YEAR 10111 (FUND
2500801-5519 TO PAY $5,944,060; AND FUND 2505801-5519 TO PAY $660,451)
TOTALING $6.604,511
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
~: ~ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
-~- ~ c ~~~,,,,,,~~.-, APRIL 20, 2011
9
03. CONSIDERATION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HOME CONSORTIUM 342
COOPERATION AGREEMENT - DRC2011-00302 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Approval of a 3-year Cooperation Agreement with the County of San Bernardino
Department of Community Development and Housing (CO 11-049) for participation in the
County HOME Consortium.
P. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per
Councilmember.)
Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
R. ADJOURNMENT
I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing
agenda was posted on April 14, 2011, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per
Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive.
April 6, 2011
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FIRE DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL
CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District and City Council held a
closed session on Wednesday, April 6, 2011, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center located at 10500
Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by
Vice ChairmanNice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo.
Present were Agency MemberslBoard Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet,
Diane Williams and Vice ChairmanNice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo.
ChairmanlPresidenUMayor L. Dennis Michael was absent.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; John Gillison, Assistant City Manager; Linda Daniels,
Deputy City Manager and James Markman, City Attorney.
B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM S
Vice ChairmanNice PresidenUMayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo announced the closed session items:
D1. LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 TO GIVE JOHN
GILLISON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND
CONFER PROCESS -RDA, FIRE, CITY
D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS:
108903115, 108903116, AND 108903135. NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS,
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND RANDALL LEWIS, FOR LEWIS
OPERATING CORP. -RDA
D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
HELLMAN AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 020901322.
NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER FOR
ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA; AND MITCH ALDERMAN FOR SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED
GOVERNMENTS.-RDA
C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S
No one was present to comment on the closed session item.
D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION
Closed session began at 5:00 p.m.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 1 of 11
E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS
No announcements were made.
F. RECess
The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken.
G. REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, and City
Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California. Vice Chairman/Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo called
the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m.
Present were Agency Members/Board MemberslCouncil Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet,
Diane Williams and Vice ChairmanNice President/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo.
ChairmanlPresident/Mayor L. Dennis Michael was absent.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; John Gillison, Assistant
City Manager; Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Mark Steuer, Engineering Director; James
Troyer, Planning Director; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director; Kevin McArdle, Community Services
Director; Police Chief Joe Cusimano; Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McKay, Records
Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Shirr'I Griffin, Deputy City Clerk.
H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
H1. Proclamation declaring April 10, 2011 as "Walk for Kids Day."
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo presented a proclamation to Dee Feldmeir, Executive Director of the Loma
Linda Ronald McDonald House, declaring April 10, 2011 as "Walk for Kids Day."
H2. Proclamation declaring April, 2011 as "Donate Life Month."
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo presented a proclamation to Ina Brown, Donate Life Ambassador,
declaring April, 2011 as "Donate Life Month."
H3. Presentation of Proclamation Celebrating "Earth Day 2011."
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo presented a proclamation to Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs
Manager, and Alana Rivadeneyra, Energy Efficiency Coordinator, in celebration of Earth Day.
I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
11. Jerie Lee announced that Assemblyman Morrell would be speaking at the Senior Center on
April 8, 2011 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 2 of 11
12. Luella Hairsten invited the City Council and the audience to the Black and White Gala on May
7, 2011 at 6:00 p.m. at Central Park. Funds raised benefit transportation expenses for homebound
seniors.
13. Justin Leal presented his Eagle Project, which is to create a Recycling Awareness Campaign,
in conjunction with the Earth Day celebration on April 16, 2011 at the Library.
14.John Lyons appreciated last year's Gala and encouraged the audience to attend. Regarding the
presentation on Donate Life Month, he commented on Angel Flight, which assists patients in their
transportation needs and assists Non-profit organ and tissue banks. Lastly, Mr. Lyons noted that
the new street signs look great.
15. Jim Moffatt expressed concerns with the approval of Item M1 (Ordinance requiring mandatory
payment for refuse collection services). He did not believe that the City should serve as a
collection agency for Burrtec and restated a request that the Councilmembers who received
campaign contributions from Burrtec refrain from voting on this matter. Mr. Moffatt did not see how
the City would benefit from this program.
16. Margaret Lawrence noted that she lives next door to a neighbor who has three dogs that bark
all the time. She has contacted the Animal Care and Services Center, who indicated that one other
neighbor needs to verify the situation before addressing the matter. Her other neighbors are
reluctant to come forward. Mrs. Lawrence requested assistance.
17. Ed Dietl provided pictures of the historic properties in the City, including the china house and
the gas station property. He noted that a Historical Ordinance is being considered and did not
believe that the provisions were adequate as property owners should be penalized for allowing
historic structures to be demolished by neglect. He noted that the City advertises on the sign
adjacent to the historic gas station and suspected that this is why the sign is allowed to be placed
in that location.
18. Amanda Feinner noted that April is Autism Awarenss Month. As she is autistic, Amanda
addressed the City Council and the audience with her need for a stable place to live.
19. Leo Diaz showed the City Council and the audience Amanda's artwork. As they are homeless,
Mr. Diaz requested assistance.
CONSENT CALENDARS:
The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon
by the Agency/Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by
an Agency/Board/Council Member for discussion.
J. CONSENT CALENDAR -REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
J1. Approval of Minutes: March 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting)
J2. Approval of Check Register dated March 9 through March 29, 2011, for the total amount of
$1,824, 683.99.
J3. Approval of confirmation of the payment of a Special Legal Assessment in the amount of
$7,500.00 for the Community Redevelopment Association's expected litigation regarding the
Local Revenue Protections under Proposition 22, approved in November 2010, and the
State Administration's proposal to eliminate Redevelopment.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 3 of 11
J4. Approval of Plans, Specifications and Estimates and to authorize the advertising of the
"Notice Inviting Bids" for the East Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Line 8 Proiect, to be
funded from Account No. 25028015650/1584502-0.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-005
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE EAST AVENUE MASTER PLAN
STORM DRAIN LINE 8 PROJECT, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
J5. Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Fleet Shoo CNG Modification and authorize the
City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Accounts 1025001-
5650/1541025-0 (Capital Reserve) and 2660801-5650/1541660-0 (2004 Tax Allocation
Bonds).
RESOLUTION NO. RA 11-006
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLEET SHOP CNG MODIFICATION
IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
J6. Approve the plans and specifications for the Epicenter and Adult Snorts Complex Liohtino
Replacement Proiect, accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a
contract in the amount of $603,900.00 ($549,000 plus a 10% contingency of $54,900) to the
apparent low responsive, responsible bidder, Ace Electric, Inc. (RA 11-003 of San Diego,
California, for the Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex Lighting Replacement Project to be
funded from 2520801-5607 (Sports Complex Projects).
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the
staff reports. Motion carried 4-1, with Chairman Michael being absent.
K. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
K1. Approval of Minutes: March 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting)
K2. Approval of Check Register dated March 9 through March 29, 2011, for the total amount of
$407,343.11.
K3. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities
District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-1 and ordering the annexation of such property to
Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Taco Bell - APN: 1077-011-45).
RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE
RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION N0.11-1 AND ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 85-1
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 4 of 11
K4. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities
District No. 88-1, Annexation No. 88-11-1 and ordering the annexation of such property to
Community Facilities District No..88-1 (Michael & Christina Shelton, Owners - APN: 1074-
491-28).
RESOLUTION NO. FD 11-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING THE
RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ANNEXATION NO. 88-11-1 AND ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 88-1
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the
staff reports. Motion carried 4-1, with President Michael being absent.
L. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL
L1. Approval of Minutes: March 16, 2011 (Regular Meeting)
L2. Approval of Check Register dated March 9 through March 29, 2011, and payroll ending
March 29, 2011, for the total amount of $5,196,727.01.
L3. Approval of Plans and Specifications for the Fleet Shoo CNG Modification and authorize the
City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Accounts 1025001-
565011541025-0 (Capital Reserve) and 2660801-5650/1541660-0 (2004 Tax Allocation
Bonds).
RESOLUTION NO. 11-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FLEET SHOP CNG MODIFICATION AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO
RECEIVE BIDS
L4. Approval of Support for H.R. 470, The Hoover Power Allocation Act of 2011.
L5. Approval of a Request from the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes for Waiver of Rental Fees for
use of the Epicenter Stadium on April 17, May 8, May 22 and May 29, 2011, for Free Youth
Baseball Clinics.
L6. Approval of attached Multi-Use Trail -Common Use Agreement -Amendment No. 1 for the
City's use of the County's Deer Creek and- Day Creek Channels' right-of-way, and
authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement.
L7. Approval to accept bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract in the
amount of $90,150.00 to the apparent low bidder, Macadee Electrical Construction (CO 11-
033) of Chino, California, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount
of $9,015.00 for the Illuminated Street Name Sion Replacement Phase 2, to be funded from
Account Number 1170303-5300 (Gas Tax).
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 5 of 11
L8. Approval to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract
in the amount of $16,037.00 to the apparent low bidder, JM Justus Fence Company (CO 11-
034) of Temecula, California and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the
amount of $1,600.00, for the Ridgecrest Fencing Project, to be funded from AD 91-2
Redemption-Day Canyon funds, Account Number 1838203-5300 and appropriate $17,637
(contract award of $16,037 plus 10% contingency in the amount of $1,600) to Account
Number 1838203-5300 from AD 91-2 Redemption-Day Canyon fund balance.
L9. Approval of a request for a Traffic Signal Maintenance Agreement with the County of San
Bernardino and the City of Ontario (CO 11-035) for the Intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and
San Bernardino Roadl4th Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-047
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF ONTARIO FOR THE
INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND SAN BERNARDINO
ROADI4TH STREET
L10. Approval to authorize City Engineer to approve and sign Contract Change Order No. 1 to
Professional Services Agreement 09-005 for the design of Wilson Avenue East and
Wardman-Bullock Road and to appropriate $99,942.00 from Account No.
11243035650/1515124-0.
L11. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R
and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract Map 18782, located between
Church Street and Town Center Drive and between Elm and Spruce Avenues, submitted by
LGC Santa Barbara at Terra Vista, LLC.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP FOR TRACT
18782
RESOLUTION NO. 11-049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18782
RESOLUTION NO. 11-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18782
RESOLUTION NO. 11-051
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF
CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18782
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 6 of 11
L12. Approval of a request for an amendment to Contract No. 82-841 with the County of San
Bernardino for the purpose of Traffic Signal Maintenance at the Intersection of Etiwanda
Avenue and Napa Street.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-052
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR AN
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT NO. 82-841 WITH THE COUNTY OF
SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MAINTENANCE AT THE INTERSECTION OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND
NAPA STREET
L13. Approval to release a Reimbursement Agreement and the Addendum to same
Reimbursement Agreement for Parcel Map 17818, located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard, east of Rochester Avenue, submitted by Footchester Partners I, LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 11-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT AND THE ADDENDUM TO SAME REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT FROM FOOTCHESTER PARTNERS I, LLC
L14. Approval to Execute an Addendum to the Epicenter Rental Contract with Rancho
Cucamonga High School for Waiver of Rental Fees Associated with Graduation Ceremonies
at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter in Exchange for City Use of the Rancho Cucamonga
High School's Gymnasium for the City's Youth Basketball Program for 2011 and 2012.
L15. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a
Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16592,
located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Archibald Avenue, submitted by Toll CA
IV, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16592 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
L16. Approval to accept Improvements, retain the Faithful Performance Bond in lieu of a
Maintenance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Tract 16262,
located 427 feet north of the centerline of Hillside Road, submitted by TOLL CA IV, L.P.
RESOLUTION NO. 11-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16262 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the
staff reports. Motion carried 4-1, with Mayor Michael being absent.
M. CONSENT ORDINANCES
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 7 of 11
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second
readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Agency, Fire Board, or
Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title.
Any item can be removed for discussion by an Agencymember, Boardmember, or
Councilmember.
M1. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
MANDATORY PAYMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL. COMMERCIAL. AND INDUSTRIAL
REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES. INCLUDING EXCEPTIONS. AND AMENDING TITLE 8
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 838 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR
MANDATORY PAYMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND
INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICES, INCLUDING
EXCEPTIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
In response to Council Member Williams, Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager,
addressed the concerns raised under Public Communications. Ms. Ceballos noted that the City would
not be serving as a collection agency and would not be accepting any money. This Ordinance
provides for a lien to be placed on a property if trash payments are not made. Currently, trash service
is stopped when accounts become delinquent, and Ms. Ceballos noted that this creates a health and
safety issue as trash is still being produced and often is illegally discarded.
Council Member Alexander recognized that the speaker had experienced problems with Burrtec and
inquired on who the community can contact in the City with concerns about Burrtec. Ms. Ceballos
indicated that residents can contact her.
Council Member Buquet noted that trash service must be provided and people need to pay for this
service. Failure to do so creates a health and safety issue in the community.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams, to adopt Ordinance No. 838. Motion carried 4-1,
with Mayor Michael being absent.
M2. CONSIDERATION OF SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING
REGULATIONS PROHIBITING MOBILE BILLBOARD ADVERTISING DISPLAYS, AND
AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
ORDINANCE NO. 839 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS
PROHIBITING MOBILE BILLBOARD ADVERTISING DISPLAYS, AND
AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Buquet, to adopt Ordinance No. 839. Motion carried 4-1,
with Mayor Michael being absent.
N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
CITY COUNCIL
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by
law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 8 of 11
N1. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00141 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Consideration of a proposed amendment to Chapter 5.12 (Regulation of Entertainment) of
Title 5 (Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations) and Chapters 17.10 (Commercial/Office
Districts), 17.30 (Industrial Districts) and 17.32 (Foothill Boulevard Districts) of Title 17
(Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding
entertainment. This action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section
15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
ORDINANCE NO. 840 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE
AMENDMENT DRC2010-00141, A REQUEST TO AMEND CHAPTERS
5.12, 17.10, 17.30 AND 17.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING ENTERTAINMENT, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo opened the public hearing.
John Lyons inquired if karaoke would be subject to the Entertainment Permit. In response, Ms.
Nakamura noted that this activity was subject to the permit. Mr. Lyons disagreed and also expressed
concerns with the requirement to reapply for the permit if the entertainment stopped for 180 days. He
noted that an emergency or disaster could affect the business necessitating its closure. It would be
too onerous to require the business to reapply in these economic conditions.
Ed Dietl concurred with the previous speaker and requested clarification on the 180 day provision. In
response, James Troyer, Planning Director, noted that if the business closed or if entertainment were
not provided for 180 days, the business owner would need to reapply for the permit.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the public hearing.
James Markman, City Attorney, noted that the provision for karaoke requires the presence of an
employee who coordinates the activity. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that the Ordinance addresses
the emergency closure of businesses.
In response to Council Member Buquet, Mr. Troyer indicated that there are currently 18 businesses
with entertainment permits. Once the ordinance is approved, Mr. Troyer was not aware of any other
businesses needing permits but noted that existing businesses providing karaoke without a permit
would need to apply for one.
Council Member Buquet supported the ordinance but noted the need for flexibility, as it is not
uncommon for a business to sit vacant for 180 days and regulations could change drastically in that
amount of time. In response to Council Member Alexander, he noted that the Planning Department
has heard from the businesses that currently have this permit; however, there may be other
businesses out there that are not aware of the regulations. Council Member Buquet noted that the
existing businesses are most likely relieved that the provisions have been relaxed and that same of
the previous issues have been addressed.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo indicated that karaoke was not added to the list of activities needing an
entertainment permit.
In response to the City Council, Mr. Lam indicated that this ordinance provides for the separation of
the entertainment permit and the conditional use permit process as well as provides for a transfer of a
permit. These changes will tremendously benefit the business community and save money. He noted
that the Council could request other changes if they desired.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 9 of 11
Michelle Alonzo, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, inquired if the City
Council could reconsider the 180 day provision. In response, Mr. Markman noted the need to renew
the permit annually and indicated that 180 days is quite a long time. The ordinance relaxes the
regulations substantially. In response to Mrs. Alonzo, discussion was held regarding whether or not to
re-open the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo re-opened the public hearing.
Michael McCarthy, co-owner of Omaha Jacks, indicated that the definition of entertainment should be
refined. He suggested that the different types of entertainment should be combined into one permit
and business owner be allowed to pick and choose the types of entertainment. Mr. McCarthy also
suggested that the owner, rather than the City, decide on the appropriate amount of security.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the public hearing.
Council Member Buquet recognized the improvements in the regulations and supported the
ordinance. In response to the suggestion that entertainment should be defined further, he noted that
the ordinance adequately addresses the types of activities that Mr. McCarthy was highlighting.
Council Member Buquet suggested that the City continue to monitor this permit to see how it affects
the business community. Regarding the regulations to reapply if the permit is inactive for 180 days,
Council Member Buquet suspected that this was an arbitrary number and was comfortable with the
annual renewal provision.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo pointed out that this ordinance was a result of various concerns that have
been raised and indicated that it will provide a more relaxed process for businesses.
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Buquet, to take up Ordinance No. 840 for first reading
and set second reading for April 20, 2011. Motion carried 4-1, with Mayor Michael being absent.
O. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements.
01. OVERVIEW OF THE VALUE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
(PowerPoint Presentation)
Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, presented the staff report.
P. COUNCIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion
P1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council
Member.)
P2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral)
Council Member Buquet announced that Assembly Member Morrell would be hosting a business
forum tomorrow from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council Member Williams reported that several of the City Council traveled to Sacramento last week.
The State is unable to balance its budget and choices are very limited. She encouraged the audience
to contact their representatives.
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 10 of 11
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo provided a legislative update. Regarding California's budget crisis, he
stated that Governor Brown has called off negotiations and is now planning to speak directly to the
voters. Some cuts have been approved and will become effective on July 1, 2011; however, the plan
to put a measure on the June ballot has not materialized and the vote to eliminate redevelopment did
not pass by one vote. He thanked our local representatives for their hard work during these
discussions.
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo also addressed the Federal budget and the possibility that the government
will shut down on Friday. He encouraged the audience and those watching this Council meeting to
contact their State and Federal representatives.
Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
No items were identified.
R. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo adjourned the meeting at 9:14 p.m. in the memory of William Bell.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra L. McKay, MMC
Assistant City ClerklRecords Manager
Approved: ""'
Redevelopment Agency, Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes
April 6, 2011 -Page 11 of 11
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Agenda Check Resister
3/3 0120 1 1 through 4/12/2011
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AI'
AP
AP
AY
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
AP
Check No
AP - 00308334
AP - 00308335
AP - 00308342
AP - 00308342
AP - 00308342
AP - 00308342
AP - 00308342
AP - 00308346
AP - 00308354
AP - 00308361
AP - 00308365
00308375
00308386
00308397
00308401
00308410
00308415
00308431
00308432
00308433
00308439
00308439
00308452
003084s6
00308458
00308458
00308458
00308468
00308469
0030847!
0030847s
00308475
00308475
00308476
00308476
00308s01
00308508
00308s23
00308s23
00308523
00308530
00308571
00308590
00308630
00308685
00308713
00308831
Check Date Vendor Name
3/30/201 I ALTA LAGUNA MOBILE HOME PARK
3/30/201 I ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK
3{30/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION
3/30/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION
3/30/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION
3/30/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION
3/30/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION
3/30/201( B & M LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER
3/30!20] 1 BUSINESS PRESS, THE
3/30/201 l CASH VOLANTE MOBII.E HOME PARK
3/30/2011 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK
3/30/20] 1 COMMUNITY BANK
3/30/2011 DUE NORTH CONSULTING INC.
3 /3 012 0 1 1 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
3/30/2011 FOOTHILL MOBILE MANOR
3/30/2011 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO
3/30/201 l HILL AND KNOWLTON INC
3/30/201 l INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION
3/30/201 I INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CEN".
3/30/2011 JACOBS ENGINEERING
3/30/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS
3/30/2011 KMB FIRE APPARATUS
3/30/2011 M1SS10N REPROGRAPHICS
3/30/20]1 NEWSWEEK
3/30/2011 NEXUS IS INC
3/30/2011 NEXUS IS [NC
3/30/20] 1 NEXUS IS INC
3/30/2011 YENWAL INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
3/30/2011 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE
3/30/2011 RAMONA VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK
3/30/2011 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
3/30/201 f RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
3/30/201 l RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON
3/30/2011 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
3/30/2011 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
3/30/2011 SOUTHWEST CONSTRUCTION CO INC
3/30/201 1 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK
3/30/20! 1 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC
3/30/201 I VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC
3/30/201 I VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC
3/30/2011 WALL STREET JOURNAL
4/6/2011 AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
4/6/2011 CALIPH LIBRARY GROUP
4/6/20(1 EASTER, PAMELA
4/6/2011 LIM & NASCIMENTO ENGINEERING CORP
4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT
4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN
Total for Check H) AP:
Total for Entity:
P-1
Amount
2,100.00
1,480.00
42,240.00
7,920.00
14,589.00
1,900.00
15,435.00
lo,soa.la
10.00
2;490.00
1,450.00
78,970.73
2,500.00
16.20
300.00
8,069.79
8,106.35
45.40
50.00
20,263.23
458.87
83.91
394.33
40.00
451.71
17,731.41
2,280.00
42,260.48
1,300.00
1,600.00
5,613.00
1,Ol0Al
20,312.10
789,707.26
-78,970.73
40,003.45
760.00
59.89
1,388.19
X07.8 ]
395.28
140.02
4,973.82
184.90
354.04
38.44
54s.70
1,071,145.1 I
1,071,148.11
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agrnda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 04/13/201
Time: ! 5:55:4
P-2
N
N
c
O
E
U
u
C
m
h
U
C
d
a
0 V
~ m
9 £ ~ ~
d r
~ N ~ N
N ~
C g O L
~ ~ O ~
~ ~ o ~
'oa
va
O
t
V
F! ,W.i {;
4
~ '. . ~
~ :
3t
~~ '_ ~
5~ A ~
Cn
L~_. ~-
' ~~.~
~ ~
er
W
r
-i >
W
h
~„~
T ~
a q
o~
O ~
e°
n°
m
a
m ~
00 N ^ N N Ol
h ~ A ( r
O O [J ~-
C N ~ N m
m
O O N
.~ nm- l+l Y m
t0 N py O M
°m m m ~ M
Q y m l r
a
Y m A O 0 p
` n w N
m 8 ~" "' oo
m y
O O N O YI ~
N N n IPO V m
0
m a i m vni m
o e ~: r r
~ N
N
r ~
m
d
m l e~
C m
- i~
,?
in
m N
m m
M
m
m
ye
O
u
N
o~ o b
m ~°+ ~ m g .? g
yy
~
N A N
j N C
r
o
ro N
y N
m A
m M
.
~ c
m
~ m
~
n
m m r w
_
o a m n r ~
~ ~
N
N I
` m °
°
o
° m
~
a o
O
o m
o
o 0
' w 0 ~ m H
=' ,
`
°
a $ S
o ai ~ g
W v
~
O h
c y~ m r rn m
P N m m
N N
~!
d
C
7
t~ ~ ] pC
~ p
~ o
E p U
y ~ ~ o
d ~
~ o ~
y y
y
CO N m m
~ !~
E < ? 'g
us
a ~
U ~ F ~
^ y C
~ o t
0 A ~
= Ya ~
W C
. ~ >
m~
u S. ro c
Q ~j c w N
a U$ ~ w
A E ~ °m y U
15_ 2 °
y c ~ ~ O
V a ~ Q t~ H
N a
`L o
c j
q O
~~ n
E `-'
m o
N C O
N
y L ~
T L
I U 0 C
O
nE E
i ~
d~ ~
E
y y N
i i~ S
c ~ `o
a y
yyyC m
O ~ C
QE ~
_ y
O m LL
~ y L
N L
(O O
d E
°o 'y E
ac ca
y N - c
u L a E!
O
U ~ y y
N U c y
0 o U o
~ ° ~ ~ `m
e d J y m
Big ao c ~ o E ~
~ ~, N N N j ~j O C
N
o',r ~ cc aE
FIN A dL C ry
RIm AL" qy NL
Y I I7 N 'C U C C
N ;E o;
u~ o~ E~
o m ~ E
ua ~'~
c~ 'ua
~ 4 O a
~p m y C
C Ej Z y a
y L 0 D jE
y y
0 C O~ O ~
A rE me Cl '>
OI W A y N~ C a
C ~? w pLd oc
W ~ m o
r °m o
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q O
C < 00 O a 4 x '/~
~1 N c
~ ~ oc o I-~
N ~jNU ny
~ ~~~
6
Q~~ N
N ~ C =
d' y ~ m o
CN m
C C
N
~~~ ~~
~ m ~ O E
a c ~ ~.
m E ~°~ °~
V ~ t Z~~
m m n~v E
K
A m m ~ E
m 0 y ~/l w O
m r~~ d ~ N
c y Q K w ,« ~ n V
W C w'L ~Cy ~"N
m L° u '~ d
~ U Q W$ Q> F~
O U
O f j
o u,
L ~
a° ~~
n
O
N
C~
O
0
N
O
,~ A
0
ao
6 ?i
C
0 0
d
4' rc
~
~
~
a
Q L`
Ty1
o
p
O C
~
9 8
~
m
C
/dam
yy M
O y C
CG~
y
r
d ~
~ C N
C ~ -
~ ~ N M
C ~ •- L
A O ~ ~
~~ o~
3
U o 0
c a.~
= O
~ a
c
eo
m
L
e
n'
A
~~
D
LL
~_
Y
Z
W
a
c~
O
D
c
LL
C
~w
T
u
m
a
m
r
O
P-3
e' M M N N N M N m m e m r n N t1] N M M m VI P e M M 'A Q LL N
O O O O O O O p O O p p O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O
p `V (~V N N N N N (V N N iV ~ ~V ~V lV ~`I (J ~~~ ~ N N N
~
~
- ~ (~ ~`! "!
~ n r
a u
_
1 3 ~ m ry o e a vl a o~
3 rZ ~ V m
m
n m
n M gg M m m e m o m N m m
m~~
~° °
rv n n n v
'O °
° °
`~'
m~
°
nm t n
d
¢°
m n rv m
v
i n n
e
m
m
n 2 m
e,
~ ~ ~ J ~
r
r '-
~
~ ~ ~ -
d
N ry pQ
p
p
8
N O m$ O N° M' N m N t°~1 ° N
N i
~ $ N M O b h b N S r N N O
N n O
m
n b N
l
O ~
m ry ry
ry
ry
N ~ ~ ~ lV N .- r vl M N ~ N ~- N ~ ~ ~ ~ lV lV M
d ' A A A A A A W W W W gg A m W W W W W A A A A W A W A A
a~~ a~ a a a~~ d~ a~~ a~ a" a~ a a a~ a ~~~
~
°N t°Y A°I N N N N f Opo O O N S N N
m O S$
°O
O$$ N N° m °
, ~
~
N
m m m ~ m~ 1~ 10 m ~ N r O ry N O O 1p N m N 1` m N O
OO M N N N r ~ ~ N IV N ~ ~ m M Cl r fV r fV " ~ ~ J fV fV t"1
O
O O
O O n O O S O S S 0 0 0 0 S ~ S 0 0 0$ 0 0$ O S O O$
1
0 O 0
O
O
pp p
p 88 SS
$ S O O
p °°
m° m
N ~mY y
yy
~
y
pp
O O
$$ n m O S O N O O
N 1°V m m n$$ ~°° ° O V O on'] N
QQ qq
0
o $
m S'
°
~'
0
m $
o
m
~
a m o v
i
o
~_ o
irn o
S E S
m
o
$ ~i a s $$ o m
V V _
e' M M E O e e e M 17 N e M 1'1 N m m e N CJ M e e Y N e m Cl
O
m O
m O$$$ O OHO O O O O$$ S S O O O O O O$$ O m O O S
O
h
N app mp ((Vy ym ym mm
S O m O ~°O m n N N O ~ Cm) ~ N S$ (°V < (V N n W m Unl m N N 17
1` N N n N O fV M i n O M N M p N N M
eo ~ 0 m m m N n m t7
rn q p
O O O O OI O°i S O O N ~ O. O O. O T m m e O O O
m O O ^
C _
O O M N N e e m e M e M f7 M M N m N m e M M a7 t7 N N m M
S S S O O$$ S S O O O O O O S O O S
O$ S S O O S O
$ O
O
°o 8 g
5
~
~~S8
~$
googgg$$S$o
MB
~gS
8
o
S
oo
o
S
,
O
O S!
O ,
,
_
p
p
p
8
8
8
8
O O O O O O O$ O $ O° S S O O O°
S O O N O N$
O S m O O O O O$ $
m 10 I ,
~ O M N N O Y N V M h O K M M N N m (n a Vf O e e N N
m m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ n m $ m o 0 0 0 0 0 ~$ o 0
'
° °O
°
~
°
o
N o°~
m$ $ o 00
o $
o(
o~~ ~ R o oo
`I N gl N
N N
V N N N N ~l N N~ L
N N ~`I (V £1 f
m `
p
p
0 e 1`7 VZ ~
O T
f Y] m N
r$
~ N~ ~ N
O
~
N
'
m „~
~
~V
t=
_
£
O
N
'm m n ~ a M g
~3 n o ~ A A
o
~ a m m
0 g o
g
Mo ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o
~ S
~
N n a a
~ O O U
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y O U (7
Y Y
Y Y
Y
Y
C rv Z
<
4 Z
Z Z
Z
2
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z Z
2
a
~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ 2
m m m
a Q
m m
O O O
m
QQ Q
<
Q
Q
Q
Q
a
Q
a F 1- F F C C U t C t F- F F f m (O m 0 (O m m m m G] 6] ~. g~
U ^ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 2 2 Z Z Z 2 Z 2 2 2 Z Z Z
~
U d a a a a a
w w w w w w w w w w w w w w a a a a a a a a
K K rc K C G K K K K K K K K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
F U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J J J
U g g g g g g g g g g g g g g w w w w w w w w w w w w W w
`
` `
W W 1 g~~ g g
~ g t
K K LL' K C G K C K W K~ K C g g g g g
O
O
O
O
O
m = ,
O
_
_
=
,
=
O
a
a
a
a
LL
a
a
LL
LL LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
W ~ =
=
=
x
x
l
l
I
Y I
. l
l
l
l l
l
Q
Q
K a Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
<
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q Q
a
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
a
QQ Q
QQ Q
C K K K C C K K K K K K C K C C C~ K K K K K K K K K K
W p w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w
Z C 0^ O ~^ O 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
W w W w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
O ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
S
°
m C
o
6
c ~
~ O
U
1.1 ^I o y pp
m
e N m m O m O ~ N m~ mm N N N O S f M m N m m m Nm CNl
y
y
f
O O S
~~
o
0 ~ - W
f f ~ ~ ~- ~- ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r
p o ~ ~~
N
N
10
n u
~
~ m ~
~~ Q U 2 2 6 m Q N~ Y F y m Y m O b LL LL Q O b J e m e N N U1
S
a>~
°
° `7
E "'
' ~~ axz OrcK>
,g i2ay ai3i iio
mmm
N c
7 i~c
'' ~ ~
-
' ~ ~ ~
um
i ®
X X X X Xmm X X n n n X X X
t
~
m
M
M
M q
0 O~ l OJ h M h e'~ S M fJ O'1 M M N N N
'! M~ t7 S C
i C
$ M M S M OI l
l l7 ~
U S LL M t m N Cl th M M M n [~ n n M 17 M m [~ th n M n M i7 t7 M n M ~
N
0
n
m
m
a
N
g
a
in
P-4
H ~.
m I ` P b P N N
N P N N N b N 0 N N 10 V' N 4 N M N N N ~ P
~
3 m p
O N O O O N
O O N N O O N N N
O O N N O N N O
O
O O O O N ~ (~ r
q A l
V
[
V
(NV O r~ ~ O I~ ~~ h< IZi O T ~~ O Q N a p O P n (~ N~ h~
LL
g
°a~aamao~aaaa~~Saa~
^°a
a~~
oS
~~ O
~
_
.
C C C G G W O O O O G W O O D
88 G Q
r~ WmONWhPh AWmWN-mM
MMmm NhNN N P
A QW Wm
m O O 6
~ ry
0 O Yml
m m
N m ^~ n' ~ N M 0 A N M h V
P ( 1+1 O O a
Q -,
f` -- ~ I
` ` ~
f 6
~ p
m$$
N N O O S N
$
$
N~ O O N m rv P N r
F
y N OO m N' O N
N
N
N
, ~ 1~ 100 W N rv
OI
O m m O m O 10
N
N O m N ~ N N
^
`
V
,
1`J ~ ~
N
N
p
- w
'
~
' -
N
N N N
N
~ ~ N N
N M
N N N ~
w
' N
pm @R
pp
p qq
ry~
ryN
ryN
ryN
ryN
1
ryp
qq 1
1
p
ryry 1
Q Q Q Q a Q Q a Q Q Q a Q a Q a a Q Q Q Q 4 a a Q ryry
q
Q Q ry~p
6~
O I
9 p p
O N N O$ N^ O b O N 0 p O $
O H N ~
O
$$ N N O O
O O
0
q
Jm ~(
I
m
O 10 ! N W N N
N O !O N N h O m ^ O O b N O !~ 1`
f O $
0
i9
C N
CI lV ry J N ~ N ~ (V N N OI N Cl ~ N A N N N M
~ $ ~ °o
o o
g °0 $ °o °o
o °o $ o °o
$ $ $ °
°
o °
0 0 ° m n m m o o °o
,
,
,
o,
0,
0
o,
o
$$
3
~~ ,
e
B
8g8$SSooSSSS~SSSSSSS
O O O ~ m 9
y , q
pO $ S $ P O $ O
O
$ S O O W
' _
~Q}~
W
N n
O
N
m I
$ Oi $ T S O O
$ N 1(
O W O O O O W N
N
O O 17 OI O
I N
~
N N
O
P
fl N P N P N N N N M P M N N P O M P M N
MI
lV P
A _
N
N
~ p
S$ O O$$ O$ N O S S S O O O O
O O$ O O O O
O m
m C'
O
O O
O
O
O b ~Wp 0 1~ W N m IV b O m
m b O< N O 1I1 1(I f0 OO O ~ 1
N p
M ON N O W
C p
P ~ N n m n
OI N C'1 r
N N
O
N O ~ 0 0 P
b ~~~ O b O I
F, 1
~ ~$ O
~1
, ,
P
N
W Y p
y
q
m
0 O N
d p
O ~
p ~ O N
d O O m O, O O N W W O
1
O v
O O O
N Q 01 W N O O A
Q g _
P t'! ~ O P O P N O VI Cl N N P V M J (`~ (7 N N M M N <
O m N 0 N N
~
C
C
M
~
C
'
H ~
m E °
9 d N ~ 3 °o°o °o °o
o °o o
0 0 0 0 °o o° 0 0 0?
0 °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o °e °a °o ~ o o o
~~ p
m Q
,
Q,
o 0 0 0 o
R ° ,
(p C N
~ g
$ 3 S °o
$ o °0 °o g o o S S o S S °o
°0
o a a a o 55 o ~ °o
o $ ~~ $
,
,
, ,
°
° ° 00 0
~ M
` a $$ °o°o°o °0
$cO °O $$ $°o
°
gg $
S o°
°
°
~ Q
S o
o 0 ~ S
~
e
'f o
n
o
o_
o,o
o
ob o 00
n ova m_n
N
l
N
m a_o
N N o
m N A
C d M N
N N N P O N N P
P N N
N
Y r 1!1 ~
R
L
~ A
Q
V
~ mm ! 0 -.--.--
- -mm W o0 00
00 000 ~ ~
-
~
- o 0 0 0
U O O
~ L 0 ~ _
_
_
p
o
O O O 0 0 0 0 0
V N O O~$ (
~~
SV
N N N ~p
OVV
j
V N N N
N
O
l ~ f
V
C O O O O
O
~ j N
~]
_~
(
p
p
~
(
~
(
O
`a
`
O N P ~
O
N
O
h N N P
N
~~
'
M ~ M m
V
N
a a ~
11
N
~
O
CV
~
N
Q
N
T
$ g A! l~ ~ [~` ~ (V a [~ (~ y A m W a N ~~ (~` a t~ A a `
~ P
U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cs o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C
N
~
$'e
a s a a a a a a a a a a
iO
8
a rc¢¢ z¢ rc rc a a¢¢ g r ~n
m
-
O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 U 4
m C
o
a UUUUUUUUUUUU
o O O O U' o V' (7 V' U' C7 U' o m Fb
N a n
ti r ~- r r a r r r r r r
p
~:
O O
~
tt K m s rc K C K C G K K
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N ~y ~ ~ ~
y N w
m m w m b b b y N ~ ~
~~~ g~~~~~~~ .~
Ill N N m N m In N N N N
N N W U
r
a z a a a a ~ ~d ~d a ¢ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
` F
3
6J o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o
r~ a >
o w
- w w w w w w w w w w w w J JJ JJ
~ E~~ E E~
~~~ E F F F F H H
F
F F F m O O m 2~
¢
~
F¢¢
¢
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O
~~ Z Z i i i Z 2 Z i Z 2
x s x x x x x x i x x x ~ >> @ Z ~' L
~
m ~ J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J G R m a F ~
» ~ a4 4a 4a 4a ~¢ ~ ~ 4a ~¢ 4a ~ 4a 4n 4a ¢ qa
g
4
4 4
4
4 4
4 a' O > > K w a
a
a a
a a
a
a
a
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ~ W W G Z LL
a o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0^^ o 0 0 0^ o 0 0 0 0
m
m
S C
m
W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W
LL ¢ K
r 1- a
LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL q D
S
a Ya
>
~ C
' >
N >
N N
C ? pC
O p
A
V
O b m N h W N O A O y M W M 0 O O
l0 O A P YI N b m 1O 1~ h m
O P P 10 m m r A h r n ,
O
U
O W
O O
p N
l7 N
W O
Z
~ ~ c
c u o
m m i p~
W
Q 1~ N m N N ((pp N W A N m W O b 0~ W O M Ir W m W
LLUW
A
yK
A
- y> p
-
`
$
~>
P gfp
PWWaa~a
OZN Q
'~
M P v > U w N U Y J M m m W
(7 U N Z F
Y L m
J~
('J 2 $
!
J
$ i¢ a E a a a a a K K K O m m i ~f m
a m (J (
~ (
~ (
~ (
~ (
~ (
~ U' n U' 'U (
'J
LL LL LL LL LL
LL
LL m m
LL mLL
LL ~ N
N O N M ^q
- ~pp
p
m
m
m
p
p
p
p
p
p
y
~ P M C'1 l7 P Cl M CI l'l ~ S 1+1 M m 17 M t7 M~~ S ~ S ~ m m
N N O b~ O
J m m M
h n
m C
m
~ C
h M
E r Q P ~ ~
V LL M M M m
a
M M M m m
I
M m
) l
I M M v
P-5
m
W
a
M
C
d
Q
O ~
7 d
C
(Q
C ~
p~ N N
O ~ ~
O y
N O ~
U `,~,, O
7
v a° ~
O O
r a
U
C
10
r
0
N
r
M
L
V
A
E
T
r
LO
a'
u
E
~~
Q~
m
N
b
qM
O
A
N
h
w
O
N
n
A
N
m
q
OI
F
m_
n
m
u
b
m
0
a
a
4
9
0
O U
K
o
o °~
~ rc
d a
LL
R
0
~_
3
a
c
rc
P-6
< ¢ a
~ U
~
a 4 ~
9~`
~
n o i
~ a
o
W a a
of
.°.~ m
n
d
g
a m
8 q $
N
0 Q' O
N
~ ° n
?
m o n
> "N'
W m a
~
m
b
N
N
N
~ M O Ci p
b
W
C ~ N
m N ~
m m n
m
~` `g m m
m
a
f
~
o „
m c t
> d '^
~ Eci~
a~
d
N
R ~ ~ n ~+
_
01 R'~l~rf a° ~ ~ m
~ O L ~
rv
~
C
E ~ O ` a
~
~ ~ d
7
U
°
° ~~
t o
y
a
a
o ~ a
t a' ~
~
V
C Q in
~
4Y q C O
O om
qA
q
1 OI
Q m A
n
3 n
Z
K H
O
¢
U
LL
0
m
R
a Y
2
~ C
m
m Ed
C
L
o m
~
Q A
it
~ b
A
U
~
u A
5
u ~'
~ °v
c
m
m -
a
I o
~,
~ >
~y ~,
~
p
K
~
a I o ~
o ~~
a a rc
E
n
~ u m °o, m m °e, e`? `n,
P C
N 11
p~ O
b C M O
~y 0 1M1
m
P ^ tlo
1
q
OI A (
p
Of N (O m
$
~ O
i A
ry 1~ f. N
N
C q
O p
O I
O
O p
O O O O O,
O
O
i
O,
O
O
O
~ 3 O ' O O O O 00 00 O
0 pO O O pC
6A p
O p
pi 0 ON W M
Ea
m~ o
o o:
I oo g $ ~ ~+
a S
d "~ or m m
z3 l
I
C
r•
a g
8 i
S j
o
e
°o °o °0 0
0
o I
m
m
m
O ~$ S p
i N N 8
O
O O S m b O
S O O
OS~ O I N
Q' r A p h YI
! 0 P p
N N S C C
O W M
~ d d N N N N
> m '
~
~
~ ~ ~ ~ I
T
d ~ ~ ~ ~
~ l0 ~ I
L I
m R m 7 j
C^L ?
t ~ $$ ___~,-
.
O
~ O >
~ yw
~~ o
~ 0 00 0
~ '
~ m ~ ii
i
V
Q O {~
~ O O O O
~ Q
N ~ i
O o 0 0 0 0
oa ~ 3~ o o ~~°rr o
t L y
v u
c ~
R p~
G pp
~C N
0 I O
O a
P H
0 O
O 1~!
f? V1
h
C
o
w m O ~
N
N gg
3 1~
d O
~ IN~1
a
o
q
bm Ti ~ D
f O Ma p
a
m q
N ^
N !
~
a ~ ~ n n ~ H
= ~ R QQ
m y N
V 0
p ~
F 2 2 6 6
> U~ ¢ O Or r ^. Q
?
~ p J J
~ ~ I Z' U
Z ~ w w E o
E
z
W _
~
~
W
'R
p o o a a
LL S 2 2 Z _
~ _
$
~~
x
Z _
S
9
E
(J
$
J O
J
J
J
J
K b
I] „1
N
~
E~ F
Q N g
s N Q Q
Q Q
Q
Q a
a Q
KK N N N ~' N
d T ~ W WWw ~ Lp O
N v ~ LL W W W W O ~
I
O
C ~
~ C
~
W ~ o $ v
~
u
m
U
rv~ n o
~ ~
m a
~
~
~ a
m$ c ~ V QQ~ ~
0
a m
$ ~ a a m
C O
0 T
~ 'C
~ V
p
m
T
~ .
'
m
m u
a -°
d " ~n
` w r R a ~
~~~ w
a e E ~
~ LL LL 'm .~ ~
O O~ ~ ~
n e~i n n ~ a ~ W j O
J O Y ~ M f a'
U J N U i LL M M n n N N
m
a v
N V ~
N C1
U j
O _I
vl e e d°
d l O O O
~' O 00
~ Q Q Q
Apl ZZZ
g
M
~
Ot O
i f0 A
m M O V C
N N r
N
lV (V
M M
n n
W F9 f9 f9
0 o e e
O O O
O O O O
O O O O
i
O N t n
n N ~ O
O) N n
C N N
W N
N
e e e e
N O r O
O r O
G G O O
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
~ M
O O
m a
M 1~
r M
~ N
r N
f9ll W
N
O~ O
O O
O O m
0
O O
_ ~ O O O O O g
N N~ N a
I N N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
` O
i
n<
c
n '
~
M
M ~
~ +I
n c~
~ a
' G E
~ a W mao ~ a
o~ r~m° ao y
c a
a c
~ Q o
c . ~
mm~ a
mu m
M
a ~
LL N a
m ~_ O_
p
3
L C y
, Y
1
~ (.s ~ 0 N N N N N N N N N N N ~
m e A ~ a a a a s a s a a a a >
m y g m c c c
0 0 0 c c
0 0 c c
0~ c c c
o 0 0 0 ~
E
y~ m j LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
K m 9 ~ W N N N N W N N N W m d
> c hex is '~~ ~~ ~~~~` 5
A C W N N N N N W IO N N N N
m
c~$ g g g g g g g g g g E
O C O
E m o T T T
m m w T T
m m T T
m o T T T T
v m m w 4~]
~
10 L 'a c c c
o 0 0 c c
0 0 c c
0 0 c c c c
0 0 0 0
a
~~ m g g g g g g g g g g g 2
U U S S
t `o `o E
LL
m
SE m
z
~ c a c c a a c c a a c o
N L
O a OIL ll O J tl IL > > I UI
V 'CJ LL 10 ~ LL l1 16 ~ 1L lL N R
a LL y O_ Z ry 0 2 Z N N _6 L
4'
C ~
N W r
C y C N N YI W y C ~, U
d
K Z r
Cl-d KN Nd Vl W 3
O c Q c
i o 0 0 o J '
m ~ m w m o
N Q IL I~ lL LL U u
d N N N N
C LL ~
.~
3
~
~
3
Fa r E
3
y >
a
~, r
0
c a c W E
o c
o m
m
c m
~
5 ~
N ~
'3
C
0 ~ J C J ~
~ Z
- v LL' ^: K p m
9 Q C C C 2
Q >
c
O
m N O O O =
N N
m O ~ o Q t
N Q Q Q U r
O
N
W
N J
Q
x r r r r o
n
o m g O z
0 m
P-8
P-9
m ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o
o W .-
b
~
U
o
L i
~ ~ N N
2 ~ o a
0: ~ W o
$
~
U
«d m e m
og
o f a ~
y
V N I
O ~
N n p
p
'
a[ O O T
n N ~
G
a°
d
~ oN
o ~ ~ '~ ~
N
'O
>° ,
~
mN
~
°
' °
C '
'
~ o '
'
< ~
O ~ ~
^„
M
W
C
d N N
o E ~0
E
C N
O 7
_
~ N M
Q
~ O t
O ,O L ~~ O N N VI ~
F O '~+ N m> ~ yl $
~
f m m r
9$ v $
O O a
(V a N N
Q
`m_ °o ~mi m
a
o vi h
>
O ~ H
b N
m
O O Y
f
~
$
~ p
S
_ r
N N
p ' v 8
< ~ ~
N u
~ uE
~ ' '
~
a >>
8r i m m C
c
u m
°'
t
~-
xi ~ n E D W N :9 U
4'+. ~- n ~ E n o 0
~ E U' C U Q In H
U ~
a ~ si
o
1
f d O LL~ yC
I O
~ ~ K S
° arc
a a
~
6
~ c
v
I ~
n
n
d N
Q C
m
c E
.. ~
'3
~ ~
C
ma
E
c
oy
" c
W q
C d
n ~ .
v
V
e~
~ °«
m c
a
~
0
m~
O p
~E
O U
s
~ m a
q m
c
~ x n
~
o ~ n
~ ~n o
M o -~
N E
N j'
j
m ~
u
n ~
a
LL C 7
d O
d O
O ~
i t
y ryN
U
C
N d
C ~
E~
C ~ 07 r U ~
_
m
^ N ~ N
U a
W 07 M O
G
r N N U
O
rv C O
~'~
y L
S n
M C_
L O O
O C y
A d
~ O
y~ ~
> N
C a M
5= 4
E
~ N
~ -
~ ~
m
~ «Z
e.
o
~ ~
m
m O ~ o
c ~
} ~ ~ mo
p ~
C S
m O n
W ~ ~ ~ ~ ? G o
5 i r ~ m
F U ~
Q W 1-Q ~ ~
m
a
N
C Y
~ d
m ~ E
m
O E w
'a+ d > r
u R 5 N
D C ~ -
Q ~ W Ci
{Q L
O ~ ~
r ~ o ~
c°~ d~
p a
~i
s
N
0
m m
m m
N pN
0 M
0
0
gl
r(1 N
0 !0f
3~
g
8~
~.j
o~
f
T
a.
~~
N
~ r
8~ O
O O
r A
0 O
0 QN~
N N
o °c
0 0
8 8
°
0
0
w~
t[
a'
A
m~
~~
>'
ai
°
n
m
V1
W N
~ ~
Z
U
r
Z
a
W
~ 0
W Oi
f
N Q
LL y
J q
U
.emu
C
N
m
iy
`o
m
y i
x
u m
er
o,e
~~
N
tN N
a SN
0 0
N N
N qh
YW] N
yO Oy
N 0
a
N
a .°t
m m
0
0
a
g m
Z
fL
O
LL
J
a
U
LL
0
Y A
Z
4 ~
m a
~ a
C
Z m
J g
C ~
J O
O ~
U V1
V
6
m
K
m
c
f
c
m
E °
E N
O <
f7 N
e
1p~
O
r
N
Yf
N
M
R
N
S
K
N
m
Q
m
O
H
P-7 0
Q U
f `~ >
a
8
° a
a s
a
8
c'
P-11
rn
a
$z
0~ o
f
gF
Y
a
2x
S
9
~
N
N
C
O
m C h
d ~
e~6 p> V o
V (p !~ N
O C '~ -
~ ~
Q y M
~ L
X O O
16 ._
o ~ ~ ~
r n°, a°
~,
ss
.~
ae
a m
a'
m
m~ v
"°
<"o g ~
o
a
m'
w~ S
~ o
m q
am
m
u
e
u
m
e
d
a
Q U ~
H ~
o_ d
a
O
a f
a
R
s
0
z
m
~~n
°'
a
o
n'
o a rc
a ~
a
C C
v ,~
W O
n N
o
m N
N
m m O N
N
r ~ r
N
q O O O
D;
E O O O
rc~
0
r
y p $~
m ~ n
$ m
°m m
m°
C
~-
m C M ° o
C d V
o
E m
.
R
/Y6 ~ ~.~
H
C
~
l0 m 7
Q ~ ~, O` `
ff ~
R O > .t. o
~
V ~ m
~
~ Q O
N `-
O O
N d r E~ o
o
Q
(.1 ~
%
{Q
~- c~ °o m m
~ Y
~ ~ T N
'
0
q
m m b
^ yN 1
!
0
y
~
g N r
N
2
C
'
O
LL
Q
U
O
a O
Y
~
¢
a _
F
~ m ~
~ N 2
_O N
_~ ~
c
0
a
'c u
Q
d
g
m
S K
C 9
y~
C A
C
A
_
O
m
C
d
N Q
rY
G C ~
6
p)
~
O
v
~
U f U' rv
C
P-13
W Sy ~ O ~ N~ N ~ a N' n
~ r~
T N N^ N,
: ~ D
Y
I ~ U ~' n
p ~a ~ o
o . W r "_ ~
~ v a >
U ~~np N o I
7
M
p
~
Q
U ~ o a 5
L ~ a
f
C ~> G 01
p
0 N C d
W F p
> O
l
Y< V N p
K W o ~ .- .- `c
0 o W
c n y
U n
n
s
, ~n
~;_ ~ W
~ m tp
V q
f ~
C N
D/ C
Q d
I L d
^
h O_ N tip 3 d
~ ° 'a
m
'
o
a° i '-
~ o
O~ w m~ o m p N m
yt ,Q o °' a ~ rv ~ ~ ~.4
p ° i
I
a N
n L
N
W y ~J b O N N M N
m O N
n~
C ~ c u ~~ n °'_ ° E
o v
~
W ~ °o o i~ ~ ~ m o
m C N N f0 N M C
O ~
~
' C
p 4
O
M d ~ r e n
V ~ ~ N qu o o ° qn
C
C o ~, $ ~ ~-LW
6 y ~
l
Q M
t
(p ,
~ m
N ~ .O ~
~ ~
e °o °o °m °l
~ '°
)
~
o
n NE
N ,
17 d N Q' .`~'
~ O ~' ~ ~> e`~'~~Q ~ fe ~~'
O~ N p N m 01 N d O
~
~ '
a LL
O O
'
Na ~G Vi
N O
~ N
as
Q p C
o ~„
~ ~ ~
i I
I W~
~
~
~ e E ~
1~ eoo°om oNi C ~ n o t~~"
m o 0 o
a . W
U Y
> e, '" c m H o
d o n
`~ W o m p
`
o o a m ° t
~ r ~
n
N N 0 Vf H
I C N p F
a
~
N g N K O
W N
M G
~
p
L
~ W
f C L
EE
y~ N O
y N
Q
C
~
a
~ q
~
~ n ~ ~ i ~
~
p i
, c p
u. ~' U v
~ ~ ~
E
~ u p
C ~.
mt n
o
a
m
E ~ ~
~ ~
p ~~ $ '
C
~
s~ w
m
.8 a"~ m
~'
~ pg -
~0
8 o
~
~
~~
~: ` ` m
~ ` ~
E v o ~ cN c B
"
. m ~ "
p m .
~~`~ ° ~ p
~ ~ v ~ f 3 - r v a w ~ f
L4'
W q ~
a ~~ I
~ ~ ~~~I
N
N ~
C .~ ~
O
m ~ d
~'
cd
C
r
Q~
C Q 6
V
O
~p N
C ~ - ~
A
Q
K ~ N M a
`
r Q
0 ~
r d ~ e°
~ a°
~c
d R
a
~~
~~¢
r
N) N
~I ~
ml
~ S
Z ,p
J
LL ~ I
J
U
z rn
W
Q
J Q
o €
O N
LL
c
Fm v
Dq
N
7
T
u
m
<_
N
~~`o`l 0 0
C~ O O
888
m m l
O O O' O
a a
d d d
O O O
r r
O O O O
O O O G
O O G OO
SSS S
S S S S
N tV ~ N
O O S O
rypnD ~ ~ 0
O O_ O O
N ~ N
O O O S
0 00 0~
S S °o
goo 0
N N r N
RJR
~_
~~e
000
g
QQ8
5 3 3 n
4V0V040
LL LL LL
O O O
Y Y Y m
2 ZZQ 2
m m ~ Q
~ ~ ~ O
000 ~
Z Z 2 2
J J J m
Ull/+
n m
e e e
m
>s>
U_ U_ U
`u°i `u~ Yf
O O O
m w m
N m m e e e e
O ry O O ry O O
N FTC EVS
m Q e F O
N ~ S O N
a o 0 0 0 0 0
3 ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~
!~ O m O O O~ O N
N N .N- 1~ O< a ~ d
6 a ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~I
o N o 0 0
N ~ F N h N
O O O O O O O O
Np O O pO pO SO SO YI
N S ~ 00 00 CI ~O N
O S S S S O O O
O O O O O O O O
Y~ N N MI f N < f~
O O O S S S S O
O O t~ O fD O O
lN'1 O N n 0 0 b A
r N m m f~ yp
O O S N O W W_ O
N N e ~ ~
O S O O O 00 O O
O O O O O
°o o° S g S S °o °o
oa o_o0 0 0 0
$SgS~~o 8
N N N N e N e H
0 0 0
N N N ~ N_ ~I
N ~ a O SeS Y`~i ~~m~~33VV
8 0 0 S 0~ 0
m
a a a r
O O O
~~~____
N fq (N(~~ In
2 2 2 0 0 0 Q
W W OW
O O O Q~Q Q~Q ¢ ~~ ~
2 2 S 2 2 Z 2 e
w w w w w w w a
D D ^ 0^ O 0 ~
LL LL W LL W W W W
LL LL LL LL 8
C ~
O `n
n
O
U
e .- m a
m ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ a
7
~T
U
C
m
a
W F ~ Y Y LL LL
_ ]X_C J 0 t0 vl m
d 00 (7 OLL O O
u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m n
LL M m M M M M M
O O O N
H ~ N ~
~ ~ o g
0 0
0 r
0 W t0 n N
o c c
a c9
f
°g °o °o
O O
fV pN N m p
S N O O N
A N O yN
tl O O r fp
O W fa0 f0 N
m N Cf O N
h m
S O O S 0
y N 0
O n N S N
n m ~pn o ~.
b N ~ O N
N 0
S S S S 8
O O O O O
SSS_S $
O A
~ ~ ~ ~ e
. ~
0 0 0 0
~~ga
aoo
a a a
h H H
" "a
~~~a m
~,m~,=
U
~ ~ C Z
~~~`
a ~ a ~
w n
X 0 0 Q m
~ ~ ~ ~ >
h N N N Q
¢LL¢ ¢LL¢ li LL y
U U U U §$a
d
W
m m O
~ $ a
N
O
m
N N
O O O 2
>r>m
oie
41
N
O
O O
mm mm
< O
n 0
S O
r r
i
.i,
r ~ r
n
h
m
a
O
rc ~
LL Q
N
a
3 6 i
O
C
ILL
m
'~ n
.E e
d
C
O
m
LL
N Y
-y vl
3 y
O
N
P
f~l
n
O
OI
tl
P
a
e
b
A
N
m
a
W
O
f
P-14
~ a ~ n
Q U
f .~
o a >C
O LL Q
a K
a° "
a
O
r
O
L
rc
~~~n
~,
m
>
a o ~
t
I ~ LL~ ry
O 6 C
a f
C Ym
` (O
Ml O
OO p
1fl
N p
N p
1"!
~ ONI,
OI
ym ~
~ g m ~ li ~ m
g
m b~
b O b N h N
O O
ry ~
b b
~ n
~n
C~
0 O O O O S O S
O
~ O O O O O S S
fi I o
Q
~ °o_ g S
r
0
~ ~' ~ °o °o °o g ~ ~ ~ o
d)
' o m °o
g
b o
g ~
l mm
m n m
~
O N
C Cg'
a _
°
° ~'+ ri ng
C
M m ~ o
o o
N P o
«
m
~ L
d
C
~ G m ~
W
~ ~
O
~
C ~. p!
lC m 7
~ Q '~ ~ ~ O ~ ~
~~
O
N
F y r
~ C ~
o
y
.,
Q @ i a o I
.
N
C
N a r $:! ~ 8 8
^m ¢ .- .- .- d
Q
Z N
1
'i c~ m g ~ ~ ~ m
I
° q e i ° ~
~ o i ~ . ~
m ~ S
G O N p
b A
N
1D
ID
N ~
p
Z Z Z
~' 11l
N N N
V1 N V1
Q Q Q
r
g
Z' ~
_ ~a~ ~ ~
E c. ~ ~ 5 E. J LL X
N: N Q
¢Q
K K K W N I
` r i` ~ N
m ~ W
w t W W W C
~ LL LL O
O ~
Z' Y
~ q C y
C {~ 6 J
m p I J LL
E LL ~ U
m
ffi m ~ e c
g' °
cw -pyo ~
J a ~ a
0 6 ~.
C
3
~ T N
V O
T I O CC O ~ F
G ~ y
O~ m m Si
m N Q m
~ m
a _
Q O 0
0
I LL N $.
n t
p
V ~ O '
~ ( m ~O m pQ
to O
U ~ m i
U J LL ei f ; N ~
P-16
m
c
0
E
U
u
K
U
N
C
O
m C
d
O ~ A
r
t1 A ~ N
O C 7 .,
Q ~ ~ M
x ~ o
. .r
F" o ,~ R
n ~ o ~
°o o a
r d
a
~ ~~
h_
~~¢
f~
e
i
~~
Tj
p~
o=
xy
L
m•'
m ~
N
m n i
M
o c o G
°
m
m m
o M
0 0 0 ~ (~
I
m O
~
n H
e
o ~m g
° ^ ~ 8
o g °o 0
N Q N ~
n
~ m =~ o
.n N
N w
O
~ N N
~ m m m
p in ~ o
o m m
1' o o
"
g
Y
j ~
N
b ~ d
~ A
~~ ~
p
N N O p N
m o U
e ~ a
m m ~ ~
~' LL
N I
6=
° 8 S
c
°o ~
°o g
o rv
M N
0
ul
N
IIM N M
Q h W
~ ~ o
m ~o
vi ai
00
m
G f
0
Y Xd
'~4c~
L
~ o m
> $ ~
a
~3 w YI
m ~' < E
Q E m ffi
E gr ~
LL c
s=
C m
m ~
~ o
J 3~ ~
v o ~
> m i
m
~ ~
U 6
m a
Q U n ~„
m F ~~
S
r,y..
zc o ~>
'o nir
3 v
E Yo a 5
& @ a s
a
w ~
a y
~ C
v m
c
m
c ~
M
.~
q
9
C
y
N
U
O y
6 ~
Cl y
~ U
C N
d m
N ~
r m
g;
y o
n n
u E
F
ul a
a~
c G
0
Q~ L
c~
o
~ E
0 0
.~'
>< o
~ "~
0
m=
°-3
N
Q G
d y
C
c
~
~ u
o~
=
3
U~
d N
Qn
a ->
~ o
a
m
a€
or
> ~
m C_
m
K v
N~
WE
`er
o
E
~a
U ~
o d
U
y
C ~
C
« L
O ~
cr
~$
H
c ~ CI
m E
« "'
?
~
m
~ N
W~
0
TO
W O
~ m 8 ~
A D ,_
~ C
C _
S
m
`
~
~ ~' o
ul y m
f Q C ¢'
P-17
z ~ ' z
a q°
a
a f
~
~~
m
m
p
O W
~
~O o 0
fO Q
'~ f N m
O O O O
a ~ ~ d~
m
N
C N
/~O
W ~ d
~'
O d
E H
~
A d
QI ~ O 8
O
O ~ C N >
Q C ~
~ w M u
O ~ A
~ o ~
n
c°~ a° ~ Y
Q d a'
m a
a~
~°n
u-
QQ
°o
n
i
O O
r
v i
i
0
F- a
w
Z
2 ~
W
Q Q
v
a
J O
w ~
a `9
c
IL
c
CL o
S ~
G
U
0
Q
ryryryy N
°n
J N
g g
0 T
vi N
~Np N
N N
0 0
m m
N W
m N
0 0
0
°0 0
0
0 00
0
I.
m
0
0
U
K
W P
O Q
Y v
Z a
C
a
N
0
E
Q
~ a_
Om
6
a
O
Y y
d ~
E
C
a
A m
INO qpN
m b
O O
m
d
°o
d d
m
rv ~ N
0 b
8I O
T
ri ~ H
°o °o
8 S
o p
N F'i
N N
0
e
a
rv
m
d
y ~
a
fQ d
Z
~ a
W C
W rv
LL
e y=
n
'o
U
r
C
m
G m
N ~
a
`~ ~
0
LL m
0
n
0
N
m
61
m
Q
c
4
m a
G U
a ~
O I
p
O a K
a ~
0
K
m r~~
Q U
~
a r
° 1 ~
O I
O ~ ~
d 5
s
rnu o g $
v q
c- 3
2 Q
Wm a ~ e
m rt
N N W
Cn 0 O O O O O
a;
6 ~ O O pOp
O O
O GO
O
~ S G
O O
O O
O
y
~ Tr` O ~p b
O
N r
o u
r8 d
& o > o
S
V N
C Y m
y ^
m vi
m
$i
O ~ M ° ~i ri
m C
m L
O £ d
R
~ ~ T ~
H
O A m 7
(C O '7 Ln ^ p~
N OT
N
H
~ O O
~
~
Q 4
~
O `
N
O O _ o
N Q, r ~ ~ o
m~ f
~ V
~
R
c
6 p~
C U p
O
O
~
N
~ C IO O N
~m d ~
^
~ ~
N
m U -
m W
Z
a
~
~ 0
w
E ~ a ~ s o b~
~ ~ ~
w
T °
N o
y ~
N ~
W
N
~
m L
C 2
Q
m ^
W
IL
°
g c
u W
a y
Y
a
LL °
la
°
C
~
~
u
N
e
~ U
m
w
m O ~ a'
a
T
V[
N
~ (r
3
W
Q ~
W Y
¢ Q
~° N
W
(7
~ o E
o m $ ~ ~
U J u 8 ~
LL
P-19
STAFF REPORT '~ -~
LNGINIiERiNG $L12VICLS DGP.1l2Td1EN1'
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 C;UCAMONUA
To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES, TO BE INSTALLED AT THE
EAST AND WEST CITY LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE
VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND TO BE FUNDED FROM 2004 TAX ALLOCATION
BOND FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve plans and specifications for the Foothill
Boulevard Entry Arches, to be installed at the east and west City limits on Foothill Boulevard,
pursuant to the Visual Improvement Plan, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City
Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The Foothill Boulevard Entry Arches project consists of, but not limited to, fabricating two steel
arches spanning Foothill Boulevard at the east and west City limits on Foothill Boulevard, and traffic
control.
A mitigated negative declaration was approved for the project at the October 23, 2006 Planning
Commission meeting.
The Engineer's estimate for Foothill Boulevard Entry Arches project is $900,000 including costs for
advertising, surveying, materials testing, construction support, and printing. Legal advertising is
scheduled for April 26, 2011 and May 3, 2011, with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24,
2011.
Respectfully submitted,
r euer
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MASlCB:Is
Attachment
P-20
VICINITY MAP
~..
.i
r , ~• ~
~u HILLSI E ~~~ i ~
~i F- ~ ILSO AVE /~ 24TH ST
\ ~ ~~~ S~ ~^ ~ ~ ~ SUMMIT A
EMS^~ V~ ~ 1J ^
HIGH ~ D AV
\. 1BTli T 30 ~ ~ ~ 30
~~•' ~ ~ ~~ ? VICTORI PARK
.v 8 LINE
CHU HST ERRA ~ N u
rr ~~0~ w W
PROJECT SITE m ~a ~ ~ . Q o o ~h PROJECT SITE
FOOTHILL LVD a 66
SAN BERNARDIN~.RD RRO ~ RTE o ~ ARROW C oR. a'
al
o ; > ~ w = BNSF RR
~ ~ ~ \ ~~^ a
Y ~ II~~II ^ sTH sr ~~
S ~~ ,~I I~ .4TH 5T . _ .. .. = .. _ .. '
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES N
AT EAST AND (PEST CITY LIMITS
ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD x.m.s.
P-21
RESOLUTION NO. /1~ ~~~~~ /
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES, TO BE
INSTALLED AT THE EAST AND WEST CITY LIMITS ON
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction
of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the
"FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES, TO BE INSTALLED AT THE EAST AND WEST CITY
LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN":
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following words and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offces of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 24, 2011, sealed
bids or proposals for the "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES, TO BE INSTALLED AT THE
EAST AND WEST CITY LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE VISUAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN " in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRYARCHES, TO BE INSTALLED
AT' THE EAST AND WEST CITY LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, PURSUANT TO THE
VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN":
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
P-22
RESOLUTION NO.
April 20, 2011
Page 2
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are
available to any interested parry on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/under the
"Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
fhe employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractoremploying tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
publicwork's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in thattradefora certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen thatwill be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be Tess
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe
P-23
RESOLUTION NO.
April 20, 2011
Page 3
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution
of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar
day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check,
or bond shall become the property of the Cify of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with
the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
P-24
RESOLUTION NO.
April 20, 2011
Page 4
correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Plaza Level
Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS); said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-
refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifcations will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-
reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and
overhead. The request for plans and specifications should include the title of the requested project
and bidder's business card, including valid mailing address, phone and fax number, and a-mail
address. Please note that plans and specifications will not be processed, given out or mailed until
payment is received, which shall include the cost of the plans and specifications and the stated
mailing fee orbidder's FedEx account number, if applicable, until the information above is received.
Checks/request shall be addressed as follows:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attention: Engineering Plaza Level
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor
may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (pertormance retention}.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for" FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ENTRY ARCHES, TO
BE INSTALLED AT THE EAST AND WEST CITY LIMITS ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD,
PURSUANT TO THE VISUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN" may be directed to:
CURT BILLINGS, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2740, ext. 4069
ADVERTISE ON: April 26, 2011 and May 3, 2011
P-25
STAFF REPORT ~r-~~"_'~'"
ENGINF_'ERING SF_RVICFS DP.Pr\RTh1E~lT ~i
Y`r
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 C,UCAMONGA
To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~~;-Z;t
Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS"
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK
CHANNEL TO NORTH OF 8T" STREET, TO BE FUNDED FROM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY FUNDS
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve plans and specifications for the
construction of the Hellman Avenue Master Planned Storm Drain and Street Improvements -Phase
2 from Cucamonga Creek Channel to north of 8'~ Street, and approve the attached resolution
authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids".
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Hellman Avenue Storm Drain and Street Improvement, Phase 2, scope of work in general consists
of, but not limited to, the installation of a master planned storm drain with pertinent laterals and
catch basins, manholes, installation of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches,
retaining walls, garden walls, street lights, and traffic signal improvements at the intersection of 8'"
Street and Hellman Avenue and widening at the railroad crossing, with new railroad warning gates
and new concrete track panels. Also, pavement rehabilitation, re-striping and pavement markings
are required. The project is to be funded from Redevelopment Agency funds. Staff has determined
that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines.
The Engineer's estimate for Hellman Avenue Master Planned Storm Drain and Street
Improvements -Phase 2 is $6,200,000. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26, 2011 and May
3, 2011 with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2011, unless extended by addendum.
Respectfully submitted,
f _
M~ eue~
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MAS/RMD:Is
Attachment
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA y~N
~~
~
HELLMAN AVENUE STORM DRAIN,
RE-CONSTRUCTION, WIDENING AND PAVEMENT REHABILITATION w l`V~ e
~
y
s
NOi TC SCALE
P-27
RESOLUTION NO. R~ ~~-DO~
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND
STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA
CREEK CHANNEL TO NORTH OF 8T"STREET, IN SAID CITY AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO
ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain
improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
WHEREAS, the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction
of certain improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the specifications presented by the City of
Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "HELLMAN
AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2
FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO NORTH OF 8TH STREET":
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
advertise as required bylaw for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified
in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the
following wards and figures, to wit:
"NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS"
Pursuant to a Resolution of the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency, Rancho
Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, May 17, 2011, sealed
bids or proposals for the "HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND STREET
IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO NORTH OF 8TH
STREET" in said City.
Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730.
Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, marked, "HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM DRAIN AND
STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO NORTH OF
8TH STREET":
PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California
Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less
than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in
which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages
for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations
P-28
RESOLUTION NO.
April 20, 2011
Page 2
of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem
wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk,
City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are
available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the
"Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such
determinations to be posted at the job site.
Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or
mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic
is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done
under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions
of said Labor Code.
Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning
the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him.
Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any
apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the
public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate
of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the
performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less
than one to five except:
A. When unemployment in the area of coverage bythe joint apprenticeship committee
has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of
certificate, or
8. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five,
or
C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1 /30 of its membership through
apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or
When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on
all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight
journeymen.
The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of
apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices orjourneymen in any apprenticable
trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such
contributions.
The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5
and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices.
Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements maybe
P-29
RESOLUTION NO
April 20, 2011
Page 3
obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San
Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offces.
Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution
of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be
governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in
Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended.
The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars
($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him
or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar
day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than
eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code.
Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work
required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable
collective bargaining agreement filed in acgordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8.
The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond,
payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of
said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded
to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check,
or bond shall become fhe property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the
lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference
between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the
lowest bidder.
The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work
shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of
the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or
supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any
work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a
certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done
under contractwhich may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for
the construction of said work.
Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and
all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract;
Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with
the provisions of the Contractor's License Law(California Business and Professions Code, Section
7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto.
The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall
indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, togetherwith the expiration date, and be signed
by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and
P-30
RESOLUTION NO.
April 20, 2011
Page 4
correct.
The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, Plaza Level
Engineering Counter, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS); said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non-
refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed
when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional non-
reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and
overhead, The request for plans and specifications should include the title of the requested project
and bidder's business card, including valid mailing address, phone and fax number, and a-mail
address. Please note that plans and specifications will not be processed, given out or mailed until
payment is received, which shall include the cost of the plans and specifcations and the stated
mailing fee or bidder's FedEx account number, if applicable, until the information above is received.
Checks/request shall be addressed as follows:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attention: Engineering Plaza Level
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been
issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga.
In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the
Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor
may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute
authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention).
The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for"HELLMAN AVENUE MASTER PLANNED STORM
DRAIN AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE 2 FROM CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO
NORTH OF 8TH STREET" may be directed to:
ROMEO DAVID, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER & PROJECT MANAGER
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 477-2740, ext. 4070
P-31
STAFF REPORT
GNCi]jVL.F'.}Zr1JCi SERV~iCflti DF_P.~R'I'~il',N'f
Date: April 20, 2011
To: Chairman and Redevelopment Agency Members
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~~~ '
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer G,~
~~
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Subject: ACCEPT THE CHURCH STREET PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER
AVENUE TO HYSSOP DRIVE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-006 AS
COMPLETE, AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO BACK-CHARGE $7,357.22 FROM THE
REMAINING CONTRACT BALANCE/RETENTION AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL
CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $140,012.00
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Agency accept the Church Street Parkway Landscape from Rochester
Avenue to Hyssop Drive project, Contract No. RA10-006, as complete, authorize the City Engineer
to file a Notice of Completion, authorize the City to back-charge $7,357.22 from the remaining
contract balance/retention. Also, approve the final contract ambunt of $140,012.00.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
The Church Street Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to Hyssop Drive project scope of
work consisted of planting of trees and shrubs, installation of irrigation and controllers, water meter
and miscellaneous landscaping. The original contractor was Belaire West Landscape, Inc. ("BWL").
Towards the close of construction, BWL filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Then, multiple stop notices
and related lawsuits were filed by suppliers who were not receiving payment from BWL. A demand
letter was sent to BWL and its payment and performance bond surety (Ullico Casualty Company)
demanding completion of the project punch list items, and satisfaction of the stop notice claimants.
Ullico had begun processing the stop notice claims and defending the City in several stop notice
enforcement lawsuits. As of BWL's bankruptcy filing, the project was substantially complete. While
Ullico was waiting for relief from the automatic stay from the bankruptcy court, the City contracted
with Spectrum Care Landscape and Irrigation Management to finish the punch list items. The City
will back-charge the project contract balance and/or retention to pay Spectrum Care for said work.
The City Attorney's office is currently negotiating an agreement with Ullico regarding payment of the
remaining contract balance/retention and back-charge issues. This agreement and any release of
bonds or acceptance of a maintenance bond will return to the Agency for approval at a later date.
In the meantime, Spectrum Care Landscape has now completed the punch list items. Accordingly,
the City should now formally accept the project and file a Notice of Completion with the County
Recorder's Office.
P-32
RDA STAFF REPORT
RE: ACCEPT CHURCH STREET PARKWAY LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER
AVENUE TO HYSSOP DRIVE
April 20, 2011
Page 2
Pertinent information of the project is as follows:
Budgeted Amount:
7 Account Number:
i Engineer's Estimate:
Agency's Approval to Advertise:
- Publish dates for local paper:
- Bid Opening:
Contract Award Date:
- Low Bidder:
- Contract Amount:
- 10% Contingency:
- Final Contract Amount:
Difference in Contract Amount:
$162,000.00
2660801-5650/1742660-0
$153,000.00
February 3, 2010
February 9 and 16, 2010
March 2, 2010
April 7, 2010
Belaire-West Landscape Inc.
$138,117.00
$13,811.70
$140,012.00
$1,895.00 (1.37%)
The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of two (2) Contract Change Orders
including the balancing statement. The notable change that was significant to the increase of the
Contract amount was re-grading the parkway to correct the depth. However, fewer shrubs were
required than were originally bid and only half the maintenance period costs were paid, which
lowered the increase in the Contract amount. The balancing statement accounted for these and
other minor decreases in the project quantities.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~ "'~
MaYSteuer
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MASlRMD/SH:Is
Attachment
P-33
0'" ~
.. - . riiaoN ~
.~ - Z
1
m
n ~
s ^~ ~
E-, ~ 3ntl tlGNtlrri!3 _
G r
Csj ~ ~
.~ ~ ..- OnlB ~ N33a0J.VG~ m
G dOSS.IH;
CL; ~..m ~ ~ p ~
a
`t'r, ~ x ~ ,~ 0 3Atl S3HOOa•
'fir ~ p
,~'~5 _ r ... ~ s
""`- N3NIlll aq
~- r. ImoM.,
' ~ ~ ~ al PI=
' ' ¢ 3nV H M o ~ ^ ~ N3nV
~....'___----..JIII 3A VSO ~ 3H d f
°~~a~ ~ =o~ C~a
p ~ as ~ an o-IV ~av j ~
~~~ ~is ~1 Lsl ~ isw m ^ ~ ~. o
. ~~ w ~t-4~~~-~~UI- 3~A NVW /_
J ~ o ^ ~33a15 lJ,a39 L~ `
j ~ m o 3ntl aV1.3NIA 1
= J 5
p 1S Vl3NaV0J m
x
15 3ai d l N \..~.r
..~ ..~ ~~~ ~ °~ 3nV 3AOa0
L.~. .._ ~
®o..~.~a®® ®e.
z F
z
~I
z
O
A
~U ~ a:.
~ a H
E'"
Q ~ C1~
x
r~
x~
U ~U
P-34
RESOLUTION NO. R/4 !!-~D
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CHURCH STREET PARKWAY
LANDSCAPE FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE TO HYSSOP
DRIVE PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. RA10-006 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, the Church Street Parkway Landscape from Rochester Avenue to
Hyssop Drive project, Contract No. RA10-006, has been completed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work
complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is
authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino
County.
H
STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPr1RTMENT
Date: April 20, 2011
To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: Ernesl Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent
RANCHO
cUCAMONGA
P-35
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A
CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT $87,000 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SCORPION
BACKHOE INC. OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER
1122303-5650/1778122-0 (SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE) IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,170
(INCLUDES BID AMOUNT OF $44,700 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY OF $4,470} AND FUNDED
FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 2660801-5607 (2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS) IN THE AMOUNT
OF $37,630 (INCLUDES BID AMOUNT .OF $34,390 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY OF $3,440)
FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE
APPROPRIATION OF $14,170 FUND 122 (SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE) FUND BALANCE
AND $7,830 FROM FUND 660 (2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS) FUND BALANCE
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency accept the bids received, award and authorize the
execution of a contract in the amount $87,000 to the apparent low bidder, Scorpion Backhoe Inc. of Hemet,
California to be funded from account number 1122303-5650/1778122-0 (South Etiwanda Drainage) in the
amount of $49,170 (includes bid amount of $44,700 plus 10% contingency of $4,470) and funded from account
number 2660801-5607 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) in the amount of $37,830 (includes bid amount of $34,390
plus 10°h contingency of $3,440) for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project and authorize the
appropriation of $14,170 Fund 122 (South Etiwanda Drainage) fund balance and $7,830 from fund 660 (2004
Tax Allocation Bonds) fund balance.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
The Redevelopment Agency approved the plans and spermcations and authorized the City Cierk to advertise
the Notice Inviting Bids for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance at the regular Council meeting on January
19, 2011.
The Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project consists of replacement of submersible pumps in catch
basins which have reached the end of their service life. Modifications to the discharge lines and the installation
of debris racks are included in the project to enhance the pertonnance of the storm drain lift station. The work
scheduled for this project will be conducted on Archibald Avenue south of Devon Street and on Etiwanda
Avenue south of Arrow Route.
The project is scheduled to be completed within 10 working days.
Res ully s bmitted,
i
William Wittkopf
Public Works Services Director
BW:ER/mm
P-36
$ 8 $
s ~ ~ ~ g
Q
~ Q
N ~
pp
H
N
~ ~
O
.n S .
_
OS ..
~
.. _- ~ O
O O
O
O
O O
CO O
N O
O
a
H N p p
~
O O pO
0o O
O $
f
O
p
N D
fy
H
M ~ [
S
U o o S S
CCkkts pQ
m 8
O C
H 8
N
O O
CCC 66 C
V
l ~
Y
1 M
y
C O
O
O 0
O
O O
O
O O
C
~ 4
R
S
j~
Y O O N
N
$~ N t7
S 8 8 8
~8 ~ ~
M
M
a p
S
N
~
N
~
~ QQ
apO
8
.
q
J
Y
I
'
V
M ~Ny
H
+
g
O W C
f
» M
d 0
c - -_-pp
O _...._..._ ____ _____ __...
~~
N ~ ~ N
$ p
~ 8
W 8
~ 8
~ S
~
~~
M
N
VOa
N
H
w e
' €
V 0 8 n S
~0
8
~1
i4
~
~i
~
m
~
V
~ ~
C ~ ,
S F
z ~v
z
6m
~5 a
~S
o
~ C e m
aZ
~e W
N ~&
~ ~
,~
S
~ u
~
~a
~ ~¢ `~ ~~ ~~
0
g
g" ~ N
J y
J N
J y
J
h ~ S
o
`y g
N
l7
Q
4y
O Q8
m $O
O O O O
_ ~ O
N {r~
N
~ 8 8 8 8
888 4C {¢. 8
m 8
O ~
M 8
CI
p H
PPPP
8 8 8 8
N !~ Y N
w ____$ -_- S -- Q _ $
8
8
3
^g
~
& yy
.TS
a
w
8 8 8 8
N N ~
~ ~ S
g QgQ
S
~
o
8 666 ;£
e{ w M
xd
V
~
a
~ 'i
v
'
f~ ~ P
~
~ k6
!
m s
~ b ~
~ 4
p ~
~ ~ ~
~
Q
Q
O s
e
c~ e
5 y
LW e
~ y
C ¢ y
D
T
~~
< W
W
S
J
~
J
.Nl
~
~ h
v 3
q N H Y
P-37
STAFF REPORT ' ` -
PLALIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTtv1ENT
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
C,UCAMONOA
To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director/City Manager
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
gy: Emest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent
Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer
Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF 9 VEHICLES TO MULTIPLE FORD
DEALERSHIPS AS FOLLOWS: ONE (1) TO THEODORE ROBINS FORD OF GOSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA; TWO (2) TO FAIRVIEW FORD FLEET CENTER OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA; AND SIX (6) FROM RACEWAY FORD OF RIVERSIDE,
CALIFORNIA AS PER REQUEST FOR 81D ("RFB") #10/11-010 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$317,966.11 FROM ACCT. NO. 1712001-5604 (VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT FUND) AND $30,455.49 FROM ACCT. NO. 2520801-5604 (SPORTS
COMPLEX FUND); AND AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,470
FROM FUND 712 FUND BALANCE (VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT) AND
$960 FROM FUND 520 (SPORTS COMPLEX) FUND BALANCE TO BE USED BY THE
PUBLIC WORKS PARKS AND STREETS SECTIONS
COMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board authorize the purchase of 9
vehicles to mukiple Ford dealerships as follows: one (1) to Theodore Robins Ford of Costa Mesa,
California; two (2) to Fairview Ford Fleet Center of San Bernardino, Cal'rfomia; and six (8) from Raceway
Ford of Riverside, Calitornia as per Request for Bld ("RFB°) #10/11-010 in the amount of $317,966.11
from account number 1 71 2001-5604 (Vehlcie and Equipment Replacement Fund) and $30,455.49 from
account number 2520801-5604 (Sports Complex); and authorize an appropriation in the amount of
$83,470 from fund 712 fund balance and $980 from fund 520 (Sports Complex) fund balance to be used
by the Public Works Parks and Streets Sections.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Cfty Council and the Redevelopment Agency Board approved the purchase of the above nine (9)
vehicles in the adopted FY 2010111 budget as a part of the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund
and Sports Complex Fund. The Public Works Services Department provided specifications to the
Purchasing Department for the purchase of these vehicles.
Purchasing prepared and posted to the City's bid system, RFB #10/11-010, there were fifteen (15)
vendors that were notified; fifteen (15) vendors downloaded the RFB, and five (5) responses that were
received. After analysla of the bid responses by the Fleet Supervisor, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet
Superintendent and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined to be in the City's best interest to split the
award for the nine (9) vehicles to each of the most responsive, responsible bidders that meet the
spec cations required by the Public Works Services Department as follows:
P-38
AUTHO:iI'LA'ITON -L'O AWARD THE PURCHASE OF 9 VEHICLES
APRIL 20, 2011
PAGE TWO
Bld ItemlBudget DescNpdon Aaslgned
Section Fuel
Type Award
Amount Aewunt Dealer
One (1) Ford E-350 Extended Wagon Parks CNG $43,528.33 1712001-5804 Raceway Ford
Eleven Passenger Van / Rplc SR# 1412
w/1/2 Tn Pass Van
One (1) Ford F-250 Standard Cab Streets CNG $39,949.36 1712001-5804 Raceway Ford
Truck / Rplc SR# 1591 w/3l4 Tn ExCb
P/U
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck ! Rplc SR# Parks CNG $42,901.04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
1328 w/3/4 Tn ExCb P1U
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck / Rplc #10526 Parks CNG $42,901.04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
w/3/4 Ton PU Ex Cab
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck ! Rp{c #10531 Parks CNG $42,901.04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
w1314 Ton PU Ex Cab
One (1) Ford F-250 Super Cab Truck 1 Streets CNG $43,078.10 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
Rplc SR# 608 w1314 Tn ExCb P/U
One (1}Ford F-350 with Utility Body Streets Unleaded $28,445.46 1712001-5604 Theodore
Truck 1 Rplc SR# 2617 w/1 Ton 6cCb Robins Ford
Utility
One (1) Ford F-350 Truck with Parks Unleaded $34,261.74 1712001-5604 Fairview Ford
Dumping Stake Bed / Rplc SR# 1592
One (1) 2011 Ford F-250 Truck with Parks Unleaded $30,455.x9 2520801-5604 Fairview Ford
Dumping Stake Bed I Rplc SR# 1521 (RDA)
w/3/4 Tn PU Fltbd
TOTAL $348,421.60
All applicable Bid documentation Is on file in the City's electronic Procurement System and can be
located through the City's Internet.
IRes ully itte ,
William Wittkopf
Public Works Services Director
WW/ER:kh
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Aeenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308330 3/30/2011 ABY MPG GROUP 28.63
AP - 00308331 3/30/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 75.69
AP - 00308332 3/30/201 1 ALLS"CAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 1,353.63
AP - 00308332 3/30/2011 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 1,511.05
AP - 00308332 3/30/2011 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 559.35
AP - 00308332 3/30/2011 ALLS1'AR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 191.22
AP - 00308359 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 5.508.00
AP - 00308359 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 233.21
AP - 00308363 3/30/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 340.08
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 300.32
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 165.31
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 154.79
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308399 3/30/2011 FIREMASTER 393.25
AP - 00308399 3/30/2011 FIREMASTER 588.62
AP - 00308400 3/30/201 I FISHER SCIENTIFIC 9,559.13
AP - 00308400 3/30/2011 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 9,559.13
AP - 00308400 3/30/2011 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 3,823.65
AP - 00308402 3/30/2011 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 482.80
AP - 00308403 3/30/2011 ERASURE, JULIE 472.00
AY - 00308416 3/30/2011 HOLT, DANNY 48.94
AP - 00308420 3/30/2011 HOSL- MAN INC 76.88
AP - 00308422 3(30/2011 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 54.36
AP - 00308422 3/30/201 1 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 54.36
AP - 00308439 3/30/201 I KME FIRE APPARATUS 348.04
AP - 00308441 3/30/2011 LEWIS, PATRICK 3'70.00
AP - 00308442 3/30/201 I L[CHTMAN, OFER 295.00
AP - 00308457 3/30/201 I NEXTEL 37.61
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 156.63
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 173.29
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 87.37
AP - 00308473 3/30/201 I RASMUSSEN, STEPHANIE !20.36
AP - 00308474 3/30/201 I RELIABLE ICE EQUIPMENT INC 254.19
AP - 00308475 3/30/201 I RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 1,067.50
AP - 00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 6,473.01
AP - 00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 1,104.80
AP - 00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 1,695.51
AP - 00308480 3/30/201 I SC FUELS 2,030.62
AP-00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 2,113.98
AP - 00308480 3/30/201 l SC FUELS 5,961.44
AP - 00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 4,974.59
AP - 00308480 3/30/201 I SC FUEI"S 1,307.79
AP - 00308480 3/30/2011 SC FUELS 3,391.04
AP - 00308483 3/30/201 l SCOTT MCLEOD PLUMBING TNC 255.00
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1 S l .00
AP - 00308491 3/30/201 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 583.59
AP - 00308491 3/30/201 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 384.13
AP - 00308491 3/30/20 ] l SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 487.75
AP - 00308491 3/30/201 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 487.75
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 119.73
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 64.46
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 1,276.24
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,276.25
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 574.77
P-39
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Dale: 04/13/20]
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:56:2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through4/12!2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,222.00
AP - 00308511 3/30/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00
AP - 00308511 3/30/2011 TERMINLX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 475.75
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 175.82
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON ]72.85
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 43.28
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 475.75
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 475.75
AP - 00308525 3/30/20 ] 1 VERIZON 475.75
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 592.27
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANTTARY SUPPLY 49.45
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 52.07
AP - 00308536 3/30/201 I WINZER CORPORA"LION 22.20
AP - 00308536 3/30/2011 WINZF,R CORPORATION 88.84
AP - 00308539 3/30/2011 ZUMRO iNC 89.92
.4P - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 240.00
AP - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 40.00
AP - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 80.00
AP - 00308568 4/6/2011 ALL CITIES TOOLS 136.59
AP - 00308587 4/6/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 210.98
AP - 00308587 4/6/201 1 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 309.75
AP - 00308587 4/6/201 l BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 413.00
AP - 00308587 4/6/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 151.22
AP - 00308587 .4/6/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 144.54
AP - 00308587 4/6/2011 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 210.18
AP - 00308613 4/6/2011 CONFIRE JPA 134,672.38
AP - 00308613 4/6/2011 CONFIRE IPA 107,737.90
AP - 00308613 4/6/2011 CONFIRE JPA 26,934.48
AP - 00308616 4/6/2011 COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS INC 1,000.00
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 312.67
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER D[STRICT 92.00
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 379.04
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CL'CAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 199.61
AP - 00308641 4/6/2011 FIREMASTER 195.00
AP - 00308644 4/6/2011 GALA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 326.70
AP - 00308644 4/6!201 t GALA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 32.67
AP - 00308674 4/6/2011 KME FIRE APPARATUS 109.29
AP - 00308683 4/6/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 24.00
AP - 00308683 4/6/2011 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,673.00
AP - 00308692 4/6/2011 MARLIN7C SA INC 135.00
AP - 00308732 4/6/2011 RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 26.25
AP - 00308741 4/6/201 I ROEDER, JEFF 1,182.84
AP - 00308742 4/6/201 I RRVI DESIGN GROUP 8,435.65
AP - 00308743 4/6/2011 SAFE-CNTRY TECHNICAL INC 60.00
AP - 00308743 4/6/201 ] SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 133.05
AP - 00308743 4/6/20! I SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 167.67
AP - 00308769 4/6/2011 SMART AND FINAL 192.12
AP - 00308769 4/6/201 I SMART AND FINAL 52.11
AP - 00308779 4/6/201( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 493.89
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,323.21
AP - 00308785 4/6/2011 TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 73.00
P-40
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:56:2
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
Agenda Check Register
3/30/201 I through 4/12/201 I
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308791 4/6/201 I UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 55.63
AP - 00308791 4/6/201 I UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERV ICE 55.63
AP - 00308801 4/6/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 382.02
AR - 00308801 4/6/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 98.54
AP - 00308801 4/6/2011 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 710.72
AP - 00308801 4/6/201 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 434.73
AP - 00308801 4/61201 l VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 86.48
AP - 00308801 4/6/201 l VERIZOA' WIRELESS - LA 34.66
AP - 00308801 4/6/201 l VERIZON' WIRELESS - LA 41.47
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 57.32
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 111.04
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 111.04
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 19.50
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 1 VERIZON 19.50
AP - 00308808 4/6/201 l WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 592.27
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 52.07
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 49.45
Al' - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 5!9.42
AP - 00308815 4/6/2011 ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS INC 945.00
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00308823 4/9/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 340.77
Total for Check ID AP: 371,586.79
Total for Entity: 371,586.79
P-41
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Curren! Date: 04/13/201
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 11:56:2
P-42
c
E
V
K
U
V
.`
W W
N ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ E ~°,
m ~ N r
O ~ O t
a O 0 L
~ ~ ~
'~aa
va
i~
S_
i
i
u
Ei
T,
09
O~
X.~
C
I
m`
o ~ ~ m
~n N n r
c .-
v m n
o N
vm, ml o
0 ~
m n ep
N N q
r m
O ~ m p
m o
d N M ~
tNn ~ ~ M
iV
N O O ~
d
m o 0
d N W
o
N
O
N
C
f I M
.- m
M
V
P
N
n
0
m
® M
~ O O ~ ~ d n
0 m n Np N p ~ fp ~
1
~ t
th N d N
m- m o ~ ~ ~
d N d N~ r
N O O
6_ t
'1 M ? A
S S N ep /~
~ n O O ^ d h
X CC
0 0 h
N N
N N
v ci e m
r r
c g
4yL
y
m
°c ~
~ ~$ m
m<a ~
`~ ~°
~ ~
,-. C
m
m
8
cd
~~¢¢yy m
8' m
Rj U
V a` o
Y
F
7
LL
C
w
L
O
f
L
U
A
W
0
H
m
~ N
CL.
c
m ° o
a ?: E
m R
~NG
man
~ L L
Try`s
O m "
°' o
«r._
`yam m
E ~
N d >
> « O
C~~
0 C
O ~
i
O N N
T
O d L
V m C
<«-,E
O m m
O N "'
N t N
c ~
~D O m
m E m
O N O.
4 Nv
C G
N m
n £ ~j'
o .._
~ m o
mEa
T
0 ~ m
n ~, E
N
eP m ~i
~~~ ~Q~
NM ~ ~ > 3 U
(O V G~~
N m L O
O) ' ~ N m
L U YO
3 'c N
m9
~ U C
~ m
y ~.~ ~~
~mU i
m
$at C'~
~ ~ « .,_
~ n~ ~
~ ~ ~
mom m ~.
gma
~ c ~
~ m w o
«F-
t^p ^ O m L N
~c ai > E c
M ~ N 0
!~ N ~~
~ 'O+~mr
.N- °" '^4
~~LL
H_ ~
~ > r
- C c
m ~
NtR
dr`~
e
C
2' m E
dr
N R
j 0 >
` uQC
UUIp T
N y
c m oc~`
m C n z
m o ~ m
N (A y
~. gN ~ ~ °~
v D ¢ L . W
} m> q
~ d ~ ~E_
U Q w _QUw
~ U ~
LL
o i >
p d'
K
o d ¢
a ~
d
O
N
t`
4
O
O
~ 3
o a
a
O
c ~
C
p. o°
m
K rc
y. o
~ , ~
~ v
3
a ~
I I ~
~ I I m ~ ~ ~
~ I
o
.X gi n m n n
o e l
f
g
g m °°
~
o e 0
rvi
m
~ I n e0i o o g o
> ' ~ n g ~ S
p a
m ry o
° g m
o Ri
$$
e m
r l
~ o
vi e
n
< 0
d
~ .`~ n ~ ~ Pa, ~ g
O
q
~ N (J
n b
~ m O O
n
W
0
T m
01
O
O
« ~ O < N 1f O O
W
N Y d
~ E
0 m «.
E y
c
o m ~' ~
rn' o
C _
w ~
~ M S
d o
e S
0 o
g
i+ N
f6 ~ ~ n S o
u
w c~-
/6 y M W
LL
I ~
m ~
m o
o S
o
g 8
o
0
` ~
m~
I v d ~ ri n v d
a o I
~ ' °~
LL ~ '0 m ~
Fm ~ o
~ o_
o
U a r e
~ d a ?
g,~ m °o c4.
a
m _
Z
~+ °
°
Qm LL N O m
Y
m m
O
^ F O
Y
W
~ Z
y I
U
N Q F
? ~ ,
=
W
u I
Z
~ K
F'
p~O°,~
9 Q 6 Q m Q
~ ~
" o ~
° "-' €
°
o
O w
LL p
L
' ~
SI Y
a
o 'n
v
a ,o m o
3 m m
~
LL U
~ o , ~
c m S
i m o 0
~
' q
A
~
u ',. '~
~ r
V
m
! c
m
0
O1
a
$
~
Q
u °
8
I ~
9 a u m
a
u ;
i~
w
LL ~
m ~ g
I
O
P-43
war
K U
LL
o i >
O dl
~' R p
o a ¢
a ~
a
N i
~ ~
a I
m~ ~
K'
Dg
~s o ~
N N
C ~
W r
T d
~¢I: a
w 1
°3I; a
m
m
m
P
N
V
N ~
q C N
d
p ~ U '-
O Ql ~ o
w l0 ~ N
(! C .W ~
w ~ N M
O ~ p t
d ~ ~
LL~~~
a°a
U
m
a
m
n
m
m
w
N
r
n
any
~~
A
L ~
5
6
O 6
m~'
g
O
QLL
U
LL
Y
Z
Q
m
Z
O
c
u
0
Q
C
~ N
ag q°
a a
O
O
O
O
T
I «°,
q
W
M
fa
c
a
C
W
L
T
A
V
5
0
P-44
w a
K U
o
- a
o i
~ rc
o a
a ~
a
0
K
W
y K U
n
0I
1 LL -
o sa ~
o i~
r z
o
o n ¢
a ~
I n
~ u
C
C W w~
f^V
A a
~1pG
O a°
S ~
G
O °o
Op
O n
A
0
Wq
m
OO
N~ro ;
O !
C
Oi
O
a p
1`!
i O
ti O
a ~
n
a;
o
o'
d
o i
g
Ea 8 0
m
~ o $ g
rc
o
xg o o ~ ~
o am ~ 2 e
•+ N ~ G n N
~
•. = f i ao
tp d t
V
0 ~ d ~
O ~ T ~
F
:. eo t
m ~ m ~ ~ i
O ~ ~ ~ o A
D. p '~ « a o
d O u `' ~
N '
'
LL ~ Q N
wC o c
L
V
N
c u ~ ~ o I g ~
¢ q
54 ~
~ ~ n
m g
o ~ n
0
ym
m LL d
n rv
~~ o
$ a
o I.
m
m M
$W Z ~
N O
Z U
~
E v
w
o 2'
E o
i
o
0
3
E
o c~
¢
a
' E
~
a
E 9
a r
~ N .~ N ~
N Z N
' N N
a C O $ Z
7 i
i
O 0
L
V
p
D
LL
= C
~
O
,
U
y~
3
¢
_ m
~ o
~ u
Q ~ ~
m
C m'
N 7
C Y
L
T 1I~
W
U
U C
~ O
G]
d
~ ~
N a ~ a
d Q O d g m
9 i V
d
~ ~
~ p
P-46
State of California
Pooled Money Investment Account
Market Valuation
2/28/2011
~~ s,-~~ e ~a~~af[yaltig-~i~OStiPtUSi~~ ~~~~~.~~~~`_.~`,$-cu~~~.€G."-;~ ,-~__.~ r;
~,Description,~~~; ,~,~Accryei€Interest,'Purch,~ ;~~~~.~.fatr value ,~ ~ Accrued Itite>•est'.
United States Treasu
Bills $ 24,925,395,972.22 $ 24,981,322,000.00 NA
Notes $ 6,038,516,695.02 $ 6,086,025,000.00 $ 18,419,742.00
Federal A enc
SBA $ 533,995,870.69 $ 532,671,181.58 $ 576,111.79
MBS-REMICs $ 521,341,377.48 $ 556,020,854.68 $ 2,468,380.47
Debentures $ 1,377,365,350.08 $ 1,376,936,500.00 $ 1,959,852.75
Debentures FR $ 200,000,000.00 $ 200,076,000.00 $ 30,625.00
Discount Notes $ 6,676,516,304.06 $ 8,702,994,500.00 NA
GNMA $ 54,874.20 $ 56,213.49 $ 542.46
IBRD Deb FR $ 300,000,000.00 $ 300,660,000.00 $ 158,439.00
CDs and YCDs FR $ 800,000,000.00 $ 800,000,000.00 $ 250,959.72
Bank Notes $ 1,050,000,000.00 $ 1,050,100,177.09 $ 656,527.77
CDs and YCDs $ 6,550,000,888.64 $ 6,550,393,837.17 $ 2,350,534.72
Commercial Pa er $ 8,235,114,912.47 $ 8,237,154,316.68 NA
Co orate:
Bonds FR $ - $ - $ -
Bonds $ - $ - $ -
Re urchase A reements $ - $ - $ -
Reverse Re urchase $ - $ - $ -
Time De osits $ 3,803,640,000.00 $ 3,803,640,000.00 NA
AB 55 & GF Loans $ 6;118,055,111.96 $ 6,118,055,111.96 NA
TOTAL $ 69,129,997,356.82 $ 69,296,105,692.65 $ 26,871,715.68
Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 69,322,977,408.33
Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and
Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost).
STAFF REPORT
AUIDfINLS'TRATIVESERVICES DEP.IRTMENT
Date: April 20, 2011
P-47
RANCHO
~LICAMONGA
To: President and Members of the Board of Directors
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager
By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director 1
Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP FOR THE PERIOD
2011-14
That the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board of Directors adopt the attached
Resolution, approving the Memorandum of Understanding between the Fire District and the Fire
Management Employee Group for the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014.
BACKGROUND
Representatives of the Fire District and the Fire Management Employee Group have met and
conferred in good faith and reached an agreement for a three (3) year labor contract for the period
July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014. The new MOU includes provisions for implementing a second
retirement tier for new employees which will reduce the City's long term pension costs. The
attached Memorandum of Understanding implements the negotiated provisions. In recognftion of
the current economic conditions in the State of California, and the ongoing fiscal challenges facing
all local agencies, including the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, this memorandum also
includes certain wage and benefit concessions designed to reduce the District's labor costs.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving 2011-14 Fire Management Employee Group MOU
2. 2011-14 Fire Management Employee Group MOU
P-48
RESOLUTION NO. FD /~"~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE DISTRICT AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEE GROUP RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR THE
PERIOD 2011-14.
A.
B.
RECITALS
Representatives of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("DisVict":
hereinafter) and the Fire Management Employee Group have met and conferred
pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code
§3500, et seq.) with regard to wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of
employment.
Representatives of the District and the Fire Management Employee Group have agreed
upon and present to this Board a Memorandum of Understanding pertaining to the Fire
Management Employee Group effective, July 1, 2011 specifying the results of said meet
and confer process.
All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby find, determine and
resolve as follows:
1. In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution.
2. The attached Memorandum of Understanding entered into by and between
District representatives and the Fire Management Employee Grdup
representatives for the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014 effective July
1, 2011 is hereby approved and ratified by the Board of Directors.
3. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2011.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, President
ATTEST:
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
P-49
I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board held on
the day of , 2011.
Executed this day of , 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice Reynolds, Secretary
P-50
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRIGT
AND
RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BARGAINING GROUP
2011-2014
P-51
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREAMBLE .....................................................................................................................1
ARTICLE I RECOGNITION .............................................................................................1
ARTICLE II COMPENSATION ........................................................... .............................1
§ 1 Salary Ranges ...................................................................... ............................. 1
§ 2 Salary Plan ........................................................................... .............................1
A. Salary Ranges ................................................................. .............................1
B. Deferred Compensation .................................................. .............................4
§ 3 Work Periods and Overtime ................................................. .............................5
A. Work Periods ................................................................... .............................5
B. Work Shifts ...................................................................... .............................5
C. Flex Time ......................................................................... ............................. 5
D. 4/10 Schedule ................................................................. .............................6
E. Overtime Pav ................................................................... .............................6
F. Call Back ......................................................................... ............................. 6
§ 4 Uniform Allowance ............................................................... ............................. 7
§ 5 Employee Group Insurance ................................................. .............................7
A. Health Insurance ............................................................. ............................. 7
B. Dental Insurance ............................................................. .............................7
C. Vision Insurance .............................................................. .............................7
D. Life Insurance .................................................................. .............................8
§ 6 Tuition Reimbursement ........................................................ .............................8
§ 7 Retirement Plan ................................................................... ............................. 9
A. Benefits ........................................................................... ............................. 9
§ 8 Work Related Injuries ........................................................... .............................9
§ 9 Carpooling ...............................................
.............................
..................
..........9
§ 10 IRS 125 Plan ...................................................................... ...........................10
§ 11 Voluntary Employee Benefit Association ........................... ...........................10
ARTICLE III LEAVES ......................................................................... ...........................11
§ 1 Holidays ............................................................................... ...........................11
§ 2 Holiday Facility Closure ........................................................ ........................... 12
§ 3 Vacation Leave .................................................................... ........................... 12
§ 4 Sick Leave ............................................................................ ...........................14
A. Full-time Emplovees ........................................................ ...........................14
§ 5 Conversion Factor ................................................................ ........................... 15
Fire MEG MOU F/NAL 2010-2011 040711. doc
P-52
§ 6 Personal Leave ................................................................ ............................... 16
§ 7 Bereavement Leave ......................................................... ............................... 16
A. 40-hour Personnel ....................................................... ...............................16
B. Shift Personnel ............................................................ ...............................16
C. Immediate family is defined as :................................... ...............................17
§ 8 Compensatory Time ......................................................... ...............................17
§ 9 Administrative Leave ........................................................ ...............................17
§ 10 Military Leave ................................................................. ..................:............ 17
§ 11 Jury Duty ........................................................................ ...............................18
§ 12 Civil Subpoena/Criminal Subpoena ............................... ...............................18
A. Civil Subpoena ............................................................ ...............................18
B. Criminal Subpoena ...................................................... ............................... 19
§ 13 Leaves of Absence without Pay ..................................... ...............................19
ARTICLE IV GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE ................................... ..................................20
§ 1 Purpose ..................................................................... ..................................20
§ 2 Objectives .................................................................. ..................................20
§ 3 General Provisions .................................................... .................................. 20
§ 4 Informal Grievance Procedure .................................. ..................................21
§ 5 Formal Grievance Procedure .................................... ..................................21
A. Step 1 ........................................................................ ..................................21
B. Step 11 ....................................................................... ..................................21
C. Step III ...................................................................... ..................................22
D. Step IV ...................................................................... ..................................22
ARTICLE V DISCIPLINE ............................................................ ..................................24
ARTICLE VI SAFETY ................................................................. ..................................24
§ 1 Compliance ................................................................... ..................................24
§ 2 No Discrimination .......................................................... ..................................24
§ 3 Safety Equipment .......................................................... ..................................24
§ 4 Employee Responsibility ............................................... ..................................24
§ 5 Smoking Policy .............................................................. ..................................25
ARTICLE VII MANAGEMENT RIGHTS ..................................... ..................................25
§ 1 Scope of Rights ...........................................................................................25
§ 2 Emergency Conditions ................................................................................ 25
ARTICLE VIII MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS ............................................................26
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-53
ARTICLE IX APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ......................................26
ARTICLE X PROVISIONS OF LAW ............................................................................26
ARTICLE XI TERM .......................................................................................................26
ARTICLE XII NEGOTIATION OF SUCCESSOR MOU ................................................27
ARTICLE XIII PARITY PROVISION .............................................................................27
Fire MEG MOU F/NAL 2010-20i 1 04071 i.doc
P-54
PREAMBLE
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU"hereinafter) is made and entered into
by and between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("DistncC' hereinafter), and
the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Management Employees Bargaining
Group ("Fire MFG" hereinafter). The terms and conditions contained in this MOU are
applicable to all full-time employees within this unit and contain the complete results of
negotiations concerning wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment for
said employees represented herein.
ARTICLE I RECOGNITION
A. Pursuant to the provisions of existing rules and regulations and applicable
State law, District hereby acknowledges Fire MEG as the exclusive recognized employee
organization for the representation unit, which includes all management employees of
District (excluding the Fire Chief), who are employed on a full-time basis. The classes
represented include Fire Deputy Chief and Fire Battalion Chief.
B. Fire MEG does not represent the classification of Fire Chief. However, all
rights and benefits contained in this Memorandum of Understanding shall be extended to
the Fire Chief to preclude the necessity for a separate agreement between the Fire Chief
and the Fire District.
ARTICLE li COMPENSATION
§ 1 Salary Ranctes
A. There shall be no cost of living Increase during the term of this MOU.
B. Survey Cities: Fire MEG and District agree that the survey cities shall be
the cities of West Covina, Corona, Ontario, Riverside, San Bernardino City, Pasadena and
Chino Valley Fire District. No later than February 1st of each year, a survey of the
identified labor market cities will be completed, reviewed by Fire MEG and District, and
used as the comparison basis for any negotiations regarding market equity adjustment and
cost of living adjustment.
C. During the term of this MOU, the salary ranges shall be those as set forth
the salary schedule adopted by the District
§ 2 Salary Plan
A. Salary Ranges
The base salary for the Fire Chief and Deputy Fire Chief shall consist of ranges
having six (6) steps, labeled A through F, with approximately five percent (5%) between
each step. The base salary for Battalion Chiefs shall consist of ranges having five (5)
steps, labeled A.through E, with approximately five percent (5%) between each step.
Placement within the range shall be in accordance with the following:
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-55
Salary on Appointment
New employees shall be compensated at Step "A" of the salary range
to which their class is allocated. If unusual recruitment difficulties are encountered or a
candidate is exceptionally well qualified, appointment at a higher step in the salary range
may be authorized by the Fire Chief.
2. Merit Salary Adjustments
Advancement within a salary range shall not be automatic, but shall be
based upon job performance and granted only on the recommendation of the employee's
supervisor and approval of the Fire Chief. Employees shall be considered for merit salary
increases in accordance with the following:
a. Employees who are placed at Step A upon original employment,
reinstatement, or promotion are eligible for a merit salary review after six (6) months of
service. Subsequent merit salary review dates shall fall upon the completion of twelve (12)
month service intervals.
b. Employees who are placed at Step B or above upon original
employment, reinstatement, or promotion shall be eligible for a merit salary review after
twelve (12) months of service. Subsequent review dates shall fall upon the completion of
twelve (12) month service intervals.
c. The granting of an official leave of absence of more than thirty (30)
continuous calendar days, other than military leave, shall cause the employee's merit
salary review date to be extended the number of calendar days the employee was on
leave.
d. If, in the supervisor's judgment, the employee's performance does
not justify a salary increase on the review date, the employee shall be reevaluated before
the expiration of six (6) months dating from the employee's review date. If the period of
postponement exceeds three (3) months and the employee receives a salary increase, the
employee shall be assigned a new review date based on the date the increase was
granted.
e. Authorized salary step increases shall become effective at the
beginning of the pay period nearest the employee's review date.
f. Should an employee's review date be overlooked, and upon
discovery of the error, if the employee is recommended fora salary increase, the employee
shall receive a supplemental payment compensating him or herfor the additional salary the
employee would have received had the increase been granted at the appropriate time.
g. The normal merit salary increase shall be one (1) step granted in
accordance with the preceding. However, to reward outstanding achievement and
performance, the Fire Chief may grant one (1) additional step increase not to exceed one
(1) step in any six (6) month period.
h. In order to address a situation wherein application of this section
would result in the inequitable treatment of employees and upon the recommendation of
the Fire Chief and approval of the Board, an employee may be placed at any step in the
salary range for his or her class.
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-20i 1 040711.doc
P-56
3. Salary on Promotion
An employee, who is promoted to a position in a class with a higher
salary range than the class in which he or she formerly occupied a position, shall receive
the nearest higher monthly salary in the higher salary range that would constitute a
minimum five percent (5%) salary increase over his or her base salary rate, provided that
no employee may receive a rate in excess of Step E of the promotional class. If the
promotion occurs within sixty (60) days of a scheduled merit salary review date, the
employee shall receive the merit increase (if otherwise entitled to it) and the promotional
increase concurrently. The employee shall be given a new merit salary review date for
purposes of future salary step advancement. The new date shall be based upon the
effective date of the promotion.
4. Salary on Demotion
An employee who is demoted to a position in a class with a lower
salary range shall receive a new merit salary review date based upon the effective date of
the demotion and receive a salary in accordance with the following:
a. Disciplinary demotion -any designated salary step in the lower
salary range which will result in the employee's receiving at least a five percent (5%)
reduction in pay.
b. Non-disciplinary demotion -that salary step he or she would have
received in the lower class if his or her services had been continuous in said lower class.
5. Salary on Transfer
An employee who is transferred from one position to another in the
same class or to another position in a similar class having the same salary range shall
receive the same step in the salary range previously received and the merit salary review
date shall not change.
6. Salary on Position Reclassification
When an employee's position is reclassified and the employee is
appointed to the position, salary shall be determined as follows:
a. If the position is reclassified to a class with a higher salary range
than the former class, salary and merit salary review date shall be set in the same manner
as if he or she had been promoted.
b. If the salary of the employee is the same or less than the maximum
of the salary range of the new class and the salary range of the new class is the same as
the previous class, the salary and merit salary review date shall not change.
c. If the salary of the employee is greater than the maximum of the
range of the new class, the salary of the employee shall be designated as a "Y-rate" and
shall not change during continuous regular service until the maximum ofthe salary range to
which the class is assigned exceeds the salary of the employee.
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-57
7. Salary on Re-employment
An employee recalled after a layoff shall receive the same salary step
in the range. of the class at which he or she was receiving upon layoff.
8. Salary on Rehire
Upon rehire, an employee shall be placed at such salary step as may
be recommended by the supervisor and approved by the Fire Chief. The employee's merit
salary review date shall be based on the date of rehire.
9. Acting Pay
Acting pay shall be one (1) step, approximately five percent (5%),
above the affected employee's base salary rate. To receive acting pay the employee must:
a. Be formally assigned duties appropriate to the higher class.
b. Work in the higher class at least fifteen (15) consecutive work days,
five (5) shifts for employees working twenty-four (24) hour shifts. Acting pay will be paid
beginning with the sixteenth (16th) consecutive day worked in an acting capacity, sixth
(6th) shift for employees working twenty-four (24) hour shifts.
10. Salary on Change in Range Assignment
When a class is reassigned to either a higher or lower salary range by
the Board, the salary of each incumbent in such class on the date the reassignment is
effective shall be adjusted to the step he or she was receiving in the former range.
11. Training Officer Assignment Pay
When assigned on a 40 hour schedule as the Department Training
Officer, the Battalion Chief shall receive additional compensation calculated as 5.26% of
Step E of the 40 hour Battalion Chief salary. This compensation shall be in addition to the
regular compensation paid to the employee.
12. Bi-Lingual Compensation
Bargaining Unit members who qualify for bi-lingual pay shall be compensated at the rate of
seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per month. Employees must pass an examination
demonstrating their proficiency in the Spanish, Chinese or Korean languages.
B. Deferred Compensation
A District-paid contribution to Deferred Compensation Plan shall be provided
as a percentage of monthly base salary as follows:
Fire Chief
Deputy Fire Chief
Battalion Chief
6%
4%
2%
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-58
§ 3 Work Periods and Overtime
A. Work Periods
1. Employees assigned to 24 hour shifts shall work a Kelly Schedule that
consists of a 24 day rotation pursuant to section 207 (k) of the Fair Labor Standards Act
(ELBA) as follows:
SUN MON TUES WED THURS FRI SAT
On .Off On Off On Off On
Off Off Off ,Off On Off On
Off On Off On Off Off Off
Off Off Off i_ __
2. The pay period for shift personnel is fourteen (14) days overtime is
paid for time worked in excess of one hundred six (106) hours in the pay period.
3. The work period for forty (40) hour personnel is seven (7) days with
overtime for non-exempt employees being time worked in excess of forty (40) hours in the
period.
B. Work Shifts
All twenty-four (24) hour work shifts begin at 0800 and end at 0800 the
following day.
2. Personnel assigned to a forty (40) hour schedule shall work Monday
through Thursday from 0700 to 1800 (inclusive of paid breaks and an unpaid sixty (60)
minute meal period.
C. Flex Time
1. The work schedules of employees assigned to other than fire
suppression are subject to change depending on needs of the District or the desires of the
concerned employee(s) (see item 3.)
2. The District shall not change work schedules when the sole purpose of
the change is to avoid payment of time and one-half (1.5) for overtime. This however, is not
to be interpreted as preventing a schedule change upon the mutual agreement ofthe District
and affected employee.
3. Employees may request schedule changes to address personal
interests. Whenever possible such requests will be accommodated, provided however, that
the needs of the District, as determined by the District, will take precedence over employee
preferences.
The District will not effect schedule changes but for good and sufficient
cause.
5. Management employees shall be allowed to work a flexible work week
upon the approval of their supervisor.
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-59
D. 4/10 Schedule
With the 4/10 implementation, employees who experience hardship due to
child care issues, may request alteration of their schedule by taking a 1/2 hour lunch and
arriving at work 1/2 hour late or leaving work 1/2 hour early. Additionally, employees who
carpool at least 60% of the pay period and 60% of the distance into their normally assigned
workplace are eligible to leave 1/2 hour early from work or arrive 1/2 hour late.
E. Overtime PaV
1. The rate of pay for overtime hours worked shall be at the rate of time
and one-half (1.5) the regular rate of pay, for those employees eligible for overtime.
2. Wages: The Battalion Chief in Training and suppression Battalion
Chief's will be paid overtime at the fifty-six (56) hour rate for any overtime worked, at time
and one-half (1.5) rate of pay.
3. For purposes of computing overtime pay under the Fair Labor
Standards Act, military leave shall be the only leave of absence not considered hours
worked.
4. For the purpose of this section, work time shall not include traveling to
or from the normal work site.
5. All non-exempt full-time employees who are called back to work from
off-duty as a result of an emergency, shall be paid at the rate of time and one-half (1/2) for
any hours worked, with a minimum of two (2) hours pay for each emergency recall.
Employees required to work more than fifteen (15) minutes shall be compensated for a
minimum of one (1) hour; any time worked over one (1) hour will be paid in one-half (1/2)
hour increments (fifteen (15) minutes work shall constitute one-half (1/2) hour). Time spent
in traveling to and from the work site shall be compensated in accordance with FLSA.
Employees required (held over) to work more than fifteen (15) minutes overtime shall
be compensated for a minimum of one (1) hour. Any overtime worked in excess of one
(1) hour will be paid in half hour increments. Provisions shall be made for an equitable
distribution of overtime, consistent with efficient operations of the District.
6. The Deputy Chief will be paid an amount equal to State and/or Federal
reimbursements received by the District for the work performed through State and/or Federal
requests for hours worked beyond the normal forty (40) hour work week (e.g. strike teams),
at the Deputy Chiefs normal rate of pay, provided the Deputy Chief is acting in a
management capacity consistent with their normal position under the Fair Labor Standards
Act. The requisite amounts equal to the time worked beyond the normal forty (40) hourwork
week will be paid to the Deputy Chief during the pay period in which the work performed
through State and/or Federal requests for hours worked beyond the normal forty (40) hour
work week (e.g. strike teams) occurs. This section is intended to allow a Deputy Chief to
lead a strike team, if necessary, as would a regular shift Battalion Chief, without having to
use accrued vacation leave.
F. Call Back
A minimum of two (2) hours of work time will be credited to an employee
who responds to a District call to come to work during off-duty hours. This section is not to
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-201 i 040711.doc
P-60
be interpreted as requiring said minimum in the event of an extended work day or when the
employee begins his or her regular work shift before the normal starting time.
§ 4 Uniform Allowance
A. The District will provide three (3) sets of work uniforms for each employee
who is required to wear a uniform prior to his or her starting date. Suppression members
must buy their own Class A uniforms at the completion of probation.
B. The District stipulates that it's goal on Uniform Allowance is to provide for
the purchase of uniform articles as specified in the District's rules and regulations, to a
maximum of $875.00 per employee per year. The Uniform Allowance will be paid
concurrent with the first full pay period after the beginning of the new fiscal year, in a
separate check from the regular paycheck.
§ 5 Employee Group Insurance
District agrees to provide group insurance plans in accordance with the
following:
A. Health Insurance
1. District will provide medical insurance through the State of California
Public Employee's Medical and Hospitai Care Program.
2. District will provide fully paid employee and family health insurance for
all full time continuous and retired employees who were hired before November 17, 1994.
3. District will provide fully paid employee and family health insurance for
all full-time continuous employees hired after November 17, 1994, at the lowest, fully paid
insurance plan which is made available~to affected employees and which is offered by the
Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Program.
4. All full-time continuous employees hired after November 17, 1994, who
want to maintain medical insurance through the State of California, Public Employees
Medical and Hospital Care Program, upon their retirement, shall be responsible for paying
their own premiums.
5. Upon the written request of the employee, along with verification that
their spouse and/or family can provide full health insurance, cash compensation in lieu of
medical benefits in the amount of $200.00 for single employees or $300.00 for employees for
dependents, may be provided to the employee. Selection of compensation shall be at the
employee's discretion. The employee may reenter the District's health plan at any time.
B. Dental Insurance
District shall provide fully paid employee and family dental insurance plan
for all full-time continuous employees.
C. Vision Insurance
The District shall continue to provide vision care coverage for all full time
continuous employees with a maximum payment not to exceed $22.25 a month.
Employees agree to contribute 0.02% of their salary adjustment to fund their contribution of
Frre MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 0407i1.doc
P-61
$2.00 a month for vision insurance. The above amount of $22.25 includes the employees'
contribution. The employee shall pay the cost of vision insurance in excess of $22.25.
In the event that vision insurance premiums exceed $22.25 during the term
of the contract, the District shall provide advanced notice to the representatives, if possible,
at least thirty (30) days.
D. Life Insurance
District shall provide a fully paid $50,000 life insurance policy for all Fire
MEG members.
§ 6 Tuition Reimbursement
College Tuition Program for Fire MEG
A. The District agrees to reimburse Fire MEG employees to recover all
associated costs of accelerated degree programs to the same degree that traditional
degree costs are recovered, recognizing that the "per quarter" costs of an accelerated
degree program are higher due to the compression of educational objectives. A cap of
$4,000 per fiscal year will be applied initially and adjusted as necessary to reflect actual
costs compared to the California State University system. The intent is to provide
reimbursement for all associated costs of a degree program, regardless of how long or how
short the period over which the degree program is administered. It is also the intent to use
the California State University system as the cost comparison basis for any limiting of the
tuition amount. For comparison purposes, it is agreed that the California State University at
Cal Poly Pomona, Fullerton and San Bernardino will be the "survey" Universities.
Associated costs:
a. Tuition based on units.
b. Books.
c. Parking.
d. Miscellaneous/labs, tapes, etc.
2. Approval for reimbursement must be obtained by the Fire Chief or
designee prior to taking the course. .Approval is for applicability of the course to an
appropriate degree program for the employee's fire service career.
B. Employee shall achieve a "C" or better grade to be eligible for
reimbursement. Employee shall submit all receipts for the class upon completion, unless
other arrangements are made.
C. For reimbursement of costs at an accredited college otherthan a Cal State
Program:
1. The District will pay an average per unit cost for each accredited unit,
employee to pay the remainder of the cost.
2. Reimbursement of costs may be initiated prior to completion of the
class if a deferred payment contract with the college is achieved.
3. Employee must successfully complete the course or shall reimburse all
associated costs back to the District.
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-62
4. The Fire Chief may choose to establish an individualized payment
schedule for each employee, based upon a college accredited program. However, all costs
will be tied to the average of a Cal State program at the "survey" Universities.
§ 7 Retirement Plan
A. Benefits
1. District contracts with the State of California Public Employee's
Retirement System to provide retirement benefits to eligible employees. Benefits
provided through CaIPERS include the following:
Employees hired prior to July 9 2011
§ 21362.2 3% at 50 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation
District pays 9 % normal PERS member
contributions by resolution
Emolovees hired on or after July 9, 2011
§ 21363.3 3% @ 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation
District pays 8% normal PERS member
contributions; employee pays 1 % by
resolution.
It is the intent of the District to adopt a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS
contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis.
2. The following benefit is available to safety personnel at employee cost:
§20930.3 ................ Military Service as Public Service
§ 8 Work Related injuries
Employees are entitled to full salary and benefits for up to one (1) year, when
they sustain an on-the-job work related injury (see California Labor Code § 4850 for
provisions). Although § 4850 covers only safety personnel, District is extending this same
benefit to all employees. Temporary disability payments received during any injury period
shall be returned to District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, non-safety members shall not
be entitled to the presumptions pertaining to injuries set forth in said Labor Code
provisions, it being the express intent of the parties that the § 4850 benefit provided
hereunder applies only to the provision of full salary and benefits for up to one (1) year.
§ 9 Carpooling
Those employees participating
their residence and work site, shall not be in
employees participating in a "carpool" shall
n a carpool during going to and coming from
receipt of a reduced workday. Rather, those
be accorded the following benefit:
Eligible carpool employees shall be regular, full-time employees who voluntarily
participate in and file a "ride share application agreement."
Eligibility for ride share-related benefits is conditioned upon:
Each affected regular and full time employee shall ride share with another
person(s) in a car or vanpool.
Fire MEG MOU F1NAL 2010-2011 040711.tloc
P-63
2. In the alternative, each affected regular and full time employee shall drive to
and from work other than in an automobile. For example, such transportation may include
a bicycle, public transportation, walking.
3. Eligibility for ride share benefits shall be conditioned upon 1) the regular and
full time employee so participating 60% of the total work days during a given month, 2) ride
sharing for at least 60% of the commute distance, and 3) ride sharing between the hours of
6 and 10 a.m., Monday through Thursday.
Individuals meeting the above qualifications shall earn $2 for every day.thatthe
employee ride shares, paid at the end of each quarter. Further, the City is desirous of
devising some type of "drawing" to provide a singular person on a monthly basis with an
item of value in recognition of ride sharing.
§ 1Q IRS 125 Plan
A. City shall implement authorized pre-tax payroll deduction of out-of-pocket
medical contribution premiums. Said pre-tax payroll deduction shall only be used for the
purpose of paying the difference between the amount of District funded premiums for
District-provided health insurance plans, and the amount of out-of-pocket premium
payments borne by the employee regarding District-provided plans.
B. The District agrees to provide technical assistance (such as automatic payroll
deduction, etc.) in the event employees decide to expand this benefit from a "premium only
plan" to a "flexible spending account" provided that those participating pay all costs
incurred in expanding and maintaining this program.
§ 11. Voluntary Emplovee Benefit Association
The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA)
through the California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist
employees with planning for future health care expenses. Represented employees are
allowed a one time election to op4 into the plan. Represented employees shall be eligible
to participate in the plan according to a schedule to be established as an addendum to this
MOU.
Contributions to the Plan shall be made as District contributions through a
salary reduction arrangement and are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS
provisions. No employer contributions are to be made to the Plan. At the discretion of the
Union, employee contributions may be amended once per year provided that such
amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan Document.
10
Frre MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-64
ARTICLE III LEAVES
§ 1 Holidays
A. Holidays are those days which District designates as observed holidays.
Holiday leave is a right, earned as a condition of employment, to a leave of absence with
pay. The holidays designated by District are as follows:
40 Hour Personnel
January 1 ........... ............... New Years Day
January .............. ............... Martin Luther King's Birthday (3rd Monday)
February ............. ............... President's Day (3rd Monday)
May .................... ............... Memorial Day (last Monday)
July 4 .................. ............... Independence Day
September ......... ............... Labor Day (1st Monday)
November 11 ...... ...............Veterans Day
November ........... ...............Thanksgiving (4th Thursday}
November ........... ...............The day following Thanksgiving
December 24 ...... ...............The day preceding Christmas
December 25 ...... ............... Christmas
Three (3) additional discretionary (floating) days may be taken by an employee
at their convenience, subject to approval by the supervisor. The thirty (30) hours for the
three (3) floating holidays shall be credited to the employee at the start of pay period No. 1
of each calendar year.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed
as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday
shall be observed as the holiday.
56 Hour Personnel
January 1 .....
January 18 ...
February 12..
February 22 .
May ..............
July 4............
September ...
September 9
October 12 ...
November 11
November.....
November.....
December 24
December 25
New Years Day
Martin Luther King's Birthday
Lincoln's Birthday
Washington's Birthday
Memorial Day (last Monday)
Independence Day
Labor Day (1st Monday)
Admissions Day
Columbus Day
Veterans Day
Thanksgiving (4th Thursday)
The day following Thanksgiving
The day preceding Christmas
Christmas
11
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-65
B. Employees shall accrue holiday time as follows:
Type of Per Maximum
Accrual Holidav Annually Personnel
Shift Personnel 12 hours 168 hours 216 hours
40 Hour Personnel 10 hours 140 hours 180 hours
C. No District employee will be allowed to exceed the maximum accrual at any
time. As excess holiday time is earned, it must either be taken as time off or be paid for by
District.
D. District employees will be advised, in writing, within the pay period prior to
the time that maximum holiday accrual is reached or that they are approaching their
maximum accrual.
E. Effective pay period No. 1 of each year (which normally occurs mid to late
December of each year), holiday time shall be accrued by the employees within the pay
period in which it occurs.
F. District will buy back all or part of accrued holiday time at the then current
hourly rate, if a request is made (in writing) by November 30th specifying holiday balance
and exercising the option to sell back.
G. Holidays may be used as scheduled time off with the approval of 'the
supervisor.
H. Any employee who is on vacation or sick leave when a holiday occurs will
not have that holiday charged against his or her vacation or sick leave.
I. Forty (40) hour personnel who obtain prior approval from their immediate
supervisor to work a holiday will be allowed to bank that holiday at straight time. If a 40-
houremployee who is eligible to receive overtime compensation is recalled to work on a
holiday, that holiday will be banked at time and a half (1.5) for the number of hours actually
worked that day.
§ 2 Holidav Facility Closure
Certain City Facilities shall close for three days during the period 12/26!11
through 1/2/12. City Hall and the City Yard shall close December 27, 28 and 29. Closure
dates for other City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact
on public services with the need for cost savings. During this closure, affected represented
employees may take paid leave from holiday, management leave, and compensatory time
or vacation accruals or they maybe reassigned to a facility. that will remain open during the
closure.
§ 3 Vacation Leave
A. Vacation leave is a right to a leave of absence with pay. It is earned as a
condition of employment.
12
Fire MEG MOU FfNAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-66
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working days of
vacation monthly according to the following schedule:
40 hour personnel
Years of Annual Maximum Pay Period
Completed Service Accrual Accrual Accrual Rates
30 days-3 years 85.72 hours 192.0 3.297
4-7 years 128.57 hours 272.0 4.945
8-10 years 171.43 hours 353.0 6.593
11-14 years 188.58 hours 353.0 7.253
15-19 years 205.72 hours 353.0 7.912
20-24 years 222.86 hours 353.0 8.572
25+ years 240.00 hours 353.0 9.231
Shift Personnel
Years of Annual Maximum Pay Period
Completed Service Accrual Accrual Accrual Rates
30 days-3 years 120 hrs / 5 shifts 288.0 4.615
4-7 years 180 hrs / 7.5 shifts 408.0 6.923
8-10 years 240 hrs / 10 shifts 528.0 9.231
11-14 years 264 hrs / 11 shifts 528.0 10.154
15-19 years 288 hrs / 12 shifts 528.0 11.077
20-24 years 312 hrs / 13 shifts 528.0 12.002
25+ years 336 hrs / 14 shifts 528.0 12.923
B. An employee who, as of July 1 of any given year, has completed 10, 20 or
25 years of service shall receive a onetime credit of 24 hours of vacation, if a shift
employee; or receive 10 hours, if a 40 hour employee.
C. The District will notify employees, in writing, within the pay period prior to
the time that maximum vacation accrual will be reached that the accrual is approaching
that maximum. The employee will then be required to (1) schedule time off or, (2) receive
pay in lieu of time off so as to not exceed the maximum accrual.
D. Any full-time employee who is about to terminate employment and has
earned vacation time to his or her credit, shall be paid for such vacation time on the
effective date of such termination. When separation is caused by death of an employee,
payment shall be made to fhe estate of such employee.
E. For vacation accrual purposes only, safety personnel hired prior to July 1,
1996 are allowed to include prior years of all fire service employment.
13
Fire MEG MOU F1NAL 2010-2099 Da071 Ldoc
P-67
§ 4 Sick Leave
Sick leave is the authorized absence from duty of an employee because of
physical or mental illness, injury, pregnancy, confirmed exposure to a serious contagious
disease, or for a medical, optical, or dental appointment.
A. Full-time Employees
All employees shall be accruing sick leave as follows:
Personnel
40 hr Personnel
Monthly
10 hours
Shift Personnel 12 hours (1/2 shift)
Annual Max.
Accrual Accrual
120 hours No limit
144 hours (6 shifts) No limit
2. Sick leave with pay may be used for:
a. Any bona fide illness or injury.
b. Quarantine due to exposure to contagious disease.
c. Any treatment or examination including, but not limited to,
medical, dental, eye, or psychiatric examinations.
d. Not more than twelve (12) days for 40-hour employees or six (6)
shifts for shift personnel, of sick leave each calendar year in case an employee's presence
is required elsewhere because of sickness, disability, or child birth of a member of his/her
immediate family, as defined in District Personnel Rules.
B. No employee shall be entitled to sick leave with pay while absent from duty
for the following causes:
1. Disability arising from sickness or injury purposely self-inflicted or
caused by his or her own willful misconduct.
2. Sickness or disability sustained while on leave of absence.
C. Except as specified in "G" below, sick leave shall not be used in lieu of or in
addition to vacation.
D. The Fire Chief reserves the right to require evidence in the form of a
physician's certificate whenever an employee is absent and requests sick leave for the
period of absence, except personal leave (see § 5).
E. Any employee absent from work due to illness or accident, may at the
discretion of the Fire Chief, be required to submit to a physical examination before
returning to active duty. Such physical examination shall be performed by a physician
specified by District and shall be at District expense.
F. Termination of an employee's continuous service, except by reason of
retirement orlay-off for lack of work or funds shall abrogate all sick leave and no payment
will be made by the District for sick leave accrued to the time of such termination
regardless of whether or not such employee subsequently reenters District service.
G. Any employee incurring a serious injury or illness while on paid vacation
leave may have those days of illness changed to sick leave with pay and vacation days
14
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-88
restored accordingly, provided the employee has sufficient sick leave accrued and the
period of illness is certified by a written doctor's statement.
H. Employees with ten (10) or more years of service shall be eligible to convert
unused sick leave to vacation in accordance with the following:
1. Shift employees who in the preceding calendar year have accrued 108
to 144 (90 to 120 for 40-hour week employees) unused hours of sick leave earned in that
preceding calendar year, may exercise the option of having one-half (1/2) of that unused
sick leave accrued in the preceding year converted to vacation leave and the remainder
carried over as accrued sick leave.
2. Employees who have accrued 72 to 108 (60 to 90 for 40-hour week
employees) unused hours of sick leave earned in the preceding calendar year may
exercise the option of having one-fourth (1/4) of the unused sick leave accrued in the
preceding calendar year converted to vacation leave and the remainder carried over as
accrued sick leave.
3. Any employee who qualifies to convert sick leave to vacation leave
must submit a written request to the District on or before January 15th of the year in which
the conversion is to be made.
I. Upon the retirement of an employee, the employee mayelectfrom one or
more of the following options:
e Seil back up to fifty per cent (50%) of his/her accumulated unused sick leave at the
employee's regular hourly rate of pay at retirement.
Designate accumulated unused sick leave for CaIPERS service credit per
Government Code Section 20965.
Apply the cash value of up to one hundred per cent (100%) of accumulated
unused sick leave to the employee's VEBA account (if enrolled), at the employee's regular
hourly rate of pay, as permitted by the VEBA plan. .
§ 5 Conversion Factor
The factor used to convert the accruals for forty (40) hour per week employees
to fifty-six (56) hour per week employees will be:
Vacation, holiday, and sick leave -work week basis:
Vacation Conversion
30 days-3 years
4-7 years
8-10 years
11 - 19 years
20-24 years
25+ years
40 Hour 56 Hour Factor
85.72 120 1.5
128.57 180 1.5
171,43 240 1.5
188.58 264 1.57
196.58 288 1.57
204.58 312 1.57
15
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 0407i1.doc
P-69
Holidav 140 168 1.5
Sick 120 144 1'.5
(40 to 56) EXAMPLE (8-10 year employee)
Employee Benefits
Vacation = 100 hours
Holiday = 72 hours
Sick = 300 hours
472 total hours x 1.5 (factor) _.708 hours total
Note: If an employee goes from a 56 to 40 hours basis, the conversion will be the
reciprocal of 1,5 or .667.
§ 6 Personal Leave
A. The employee shall be granted one (1) day paid personal leave, in addition
to the normal leave accrual, to attend the funeral of a relative not in the employee's
immediate family.
B. An employee required to appear before a court for other than subpoenas
due to actions as a District employee or jury duty will receive the necessary time as paid
personal leave, providing:
1. He or she notifies his or her supervisor with adequate advance notice
so that a relief may be obtained.
2. The employee must return to work within a reasonable time after the
appearance.
C. Personal leave will be charged against any leave account in which the
employee has accrued an appropriate balance, such as sick leave, vacation, or
compensatory time. It is the employee's option which account is to be charged.
D. Employees can use up to twenty (20) hours of accrued sick leave as
personal leave. This twenty (20) hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour)
throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for emergency situaticns requiring the
employee's attention and requires prior approval by their supervisor.
§ 7 Bereavement Leave
A. 40-hour Personnel
In the event of a death in the employee's immediate family, the employee
shall be granted three (3) days paid bereavement leave, in addition to the normal leave
accrual. A maximum of five (5) days paid bereavement leave, in addition to the normal
leave accrual, shall be granted if there is a death in the immediate family outside the state
boundaries.
B. Shift Personnel
In the event of a death in the employee's immediate family, the employee
shall be granted two (2) shifts paid bereavement leave, in addition to the normal leave
16
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-70
accrual. A maximum of three (3) shifts paid bereavement leave, in addition to the normal
leave accrual, shall be granted if there is a death in the immediate family outside the state
boundaries and the employee attends the services.
C. Immediate family is defined as:
Spouse, children, stepchildren, parents, stepfather, stepmother, brother,
sister, grandfather, grandmother, grandchild, and the employee's mother-in law, father-in-
law orgrandparents-in law.
§ 8 Compensatory Time
A. In lieu of overtime pay, those employees assigned to a fire suppression 24
hour shift, at the employee's option, may be compensated with compensatory time off
(CTO). CTO will accrue at the rate of one and one half hours for each overtime hour
worked. An employee may accumulate a maximum of 96 hours of CTO. Once an
employee accumulates 96 hours of CTO, any additional overtime hours will be paid to the
employee at his or her regular overtime rate of pay in the period earned. In addition, all
hours remaining in a represented employee's CTO accrual "bank" will be paid to the
employee at the employee's regular rate of pay at the end of the fiscal year and the
balance in the CTO accounts will be reduced to zero hours.
B. Compensatory time may be earned for required attendance at special meetings
of the Board of Directors and District Committees, except when such meetings are held in
lieu of a regularly scheduled meeting or when such meetings are called and/or scheduled
as part of the annual budget preparation process and annual audit.
C. Compensatory time may also be earned for special and/or unusual work
situation not provided for in the preceding paragraphs.
§ 9 Administrative Leave
Administrative Leave: The following classifications shall earn Administrative
Leave annually as follows:
Deputy Fire Chief .....:...........75 hours
Fire Chief .............................100 hours
Unused administrative leave, to a maximum of forty (40) hours at the end of the
calendar year may be sold back to District at the employee's then current hourly rate.
Administrative leave shall not be carried over beyond the year in which it was earned.
§ 10 Military Leave
A. Every employee who is a member of a state or federal reserve military unit
shall be entitled to be absent from service with District while engaged in the performance of
ordered military duty and while going to or returning from such duty in accordance with the
laws of the State of California or federal government.
B. Employees are entitled to thirty (30) days paid military leave in any one
fiscal year, provided they have been employed by the District for one (1 }year prior to this
r7
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 04071 Ldoc
P-71
leave. Any employee with less than one (1) year of service must use accrued annual leave
or compensatory time if he or she wishes to receive normal pay.
C. Employees who are called or volunteer for active service with the armed
forces of the United States shall be entitled to reinstatement to their former positions.
Upon application for reinstatement, the individual must display a certificate showing service
was other than dishonorable. However, any individual possessing right of reinstatement
automatically forfeits these rights upon voluntary enlistment for a second term.
D. Any employee returning from service with the armed forces shall be entitled
to such length of service seniority as would have been credited to them had they remained
for that period of time with the District.
E. An employee who was in a probationary period at the time of military leave
shall, upon return, complete the remaining portion of the probationary period according to
the rules in effect at the start of military leave.
F. An employee promoted to fill a vacancy created by a person serving in the
armed forces shall hold such position subject to the return of the veteran. The employee
affected by the return shall be restored to his or her former position or one of a similar
nature when the returning employee resumes the position he or she previously held.
§ 11 Jurv Duty
Any member of the District who is called or required to serve as a trial juror
may be absent from duty with the District during the period of such service or whsle
necessarily being present in court as a result of such call. Such member on jury duty will
continue to receive normal pay, provided he or she:
A. Notifies his or her supervisor in advance, with adequate time remaining so
that a relief may be obtained.
B. Returned to work within a reasonable time after being released with a
signed certificate of service from the court stipulating the hours of service and release time.
This certificate may be obtained by asking the court secretary or bailiff. The employee
then forwards it to his or her supervisor.
C. Pay received for service while absent from the District must be surrendered
to the District; however, pay received while off duty may be kept by the employee.
D, All personnel called for jury duty must abide by all of the above rules and
must return to work if dismissed before the end of their regular work shift.
§ 12 Civil Subpoena/Criminal Subpoena
A. Civil Subpoena
1. When members of the District have been served a civil subpoena to
appear in court as a witness due to actions as a District employee, the following procedure
shall be followed:
a. Personnel will be paid at their regular hourly rate while they are in
court.
18
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-201 i 040711. doc
P-72
b. District transportation will be provided when available. If the
employee uses his or her own transportation, he or she will be reimbursed by the District at
the prevailing mileage rate.
c. Ifthe employee is required to appear in a courtthat is outsidethe
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and this appearance requires the employee to
buy a meal and/or lodging, he or she will be reimbursed.
If an extended appearance in court is necessary where lodging and meals
would be required, authorization shall be obtained from the Fire Chief.
B. Criminal Subpoena
1. Pursuant to California Penal Code § 1326 et. seq., if an employee is
served with a criminal subpoena, the employee will be paid at the regular hourly rate while
in court.
2. District transportation will be provided when available. If the employee
uses their own transportation, they will be reimbursed by District at the prevailing mileage
rate.
3. If the employee is required to appear in court outside the Rancho
Cucamonga Fire Protection District and this appearance requires the employee to buy a
meal, he or she will be reimbursed. If an extended appearance in court is necessary where
lodging and meals would be required, authorization shall be obtained from the Fire Chief.
4. A criminal subpoena need not have a court stamp affixed.
§ 13 Leaves of Absence without Pav
A. Upon the written request of the employee, a leave of absence may be
granted for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days by the Fire Chief, or a period not to
exceed one (1) year by the Board of Directors.
B. Failure of the employee to return to his or her employment upon the
termination of an authorized leave of absence shall constitute a separation from service by
that employee,
C. Leave of absence without pay granted by the Board shall not be construed
as a break in service or employment. During these periods, vacation, holiday, or sick leave
credits shall not accrue. An employee reinstated after a leave of absence without pay shall
receive the same step in the salary range received when he or she began the leave of
absence. Time spent on such leave without pay shall not count toward service for
increases within the salary range or for the purposes of seniority. For purposes of this
section, the employee's merit increase eligibility date shall be adjusted to the date of
reinstatement.
D. An employee on an approved leave of absence without pay may continue
medical insurance coverage by paying the full cost to District, in advance, for each month,
or portion thereof, of which he or she is absent.
19
Frre MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-73
ARTICLE IV GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE
§1 Purpose
This article is intended to provide a fair and orderly procedure forthe resolution
of employee grievances. A grievance is a claimed violation, misinterpretation,
misapplication, or noncompliance with existing District codes, resolutions, written rules,
policies, procedures, orders, and regulations, or this document. This grievance
procedure shall not apply to disciplinary matters or to reviews of performance
evaluation reports or to discharge of probationary employees. Disciplinary matters
include alf warnings, written reprimands, suspensions, reductions in pay which are
not the result of transfer or reassignment, demotions, dismissal or any other action
which consists of a faking of property as said term is defined by the courts in the
disciplinary context. (Reassignments and/or transfers that result in a loss of
compensation shall not be deemed to be disciplinary actions.)
§ 2 Objectives
The grievance procedure is established to accomplish the following objectives:
A. To settle disagreements at the employee-supervisor level, informally if
possible.
B. To provide an orderly procedure to handle grievances.
C. To resolve grievances as quickly as possible.
D. To correct, if possible, the cause of grievances to prevent future similar
complaints.
E. To provide for atwo-way system of communication by making it possible for
levels of supervision to address problems, complaints, and questions raised by employees.
F. To reduce the number of grievances by allowing them to be expressed and
thereby adjusted and eliminated.
G. To promote harmonious relations generally among employees, their
supervisors and the administrative staff.
H. To assure fair and equitable treatment of all employees.
§ 3 General Provisions
A. Preparation of a grievance will be accomplished in such a manner and at a
time that will not interfere with normally required work procedures.
B. The Board of Directors or its individual members shall not be approached
by employees or their representatives at any time that the grievance is being processed.
C. Failure of the grievant to comply with time limitations specified in the
grievance procedure shall constitute a withdrawal of the grievance, except upon a showing
of good cause for such failure. Failure of District supervisory or administrative staff to
comply with specified time limitations shall permit the grievant to proceed to the next step
in the procedure. EXCEPTION: Notwithstanding the above, an extension of time is
permitted with the mutual consent of both parties.
20
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010.2011 040711,doc
P-74
D. In the event a grievant elects to represent himself or herself or is
represented by counsel other than that provided by the employee organization, the
employee organization shall be apprised of the nature and resolution of the grievance if the
issues involved are within the scope of said organization's representation rights.
E. If an individual named in a dispute is unavailable within the time period
specified in these procedures, time limitations can be extended by mutual agreement ofthe
representatives of the respective parties.
F. Any period of time specified in this rule for the giving of notice or taking of
any action exclude weekends and holidays.
G. Unless otherwise specifically provided for herein, the term "days" shall
mean business days of the District's Administrative offices.
H. An arbitrator shall not have authority to determine if a matter is within the
definition of a "grievance" and/or is timely filed or otherwise administratively prosecuted on
a timely basis.
§ 4 Informal Grievance Procedure
Most problems or complaints can be settled if the employee vain promptly,
informally and amicably discuss them with his or her immediate supervisor. Such an initial
discussion shall precede any use of the fonrat grievance procedure. If the immediate
supervisor fails to reply to the employee within ten {10) days, or the employee is not
satisfied with the decision, the employee may utilize the Formal Grievance Procedure.
Although invocation of the Informal Grievance Procedure does not mandate submission of
the grievance in writing, the immediate supervisor shall document the substance of the
informal grievance meeting. Failure by the employee to advise the immediate supervisor of
the grievable problem or complaint within seven (7) days of the date that the employee
knew or should reasonably have known of the existence of the problem or complaint, shall
constitute a waiver by the employee of the ability to utilize the grievance procedure.
§ 5 Formal Grievance Procedure
A. Step I
The employee and/or representative shall present the grievance, in writing
and signed, to his or her immediate supervisor within fifteen (15) days of the date that the
employee knew or reasonably should have known of the events giving rise to the
grievance. An official grievance form must be used stating names, dates, times, place, and
nature of grievance, explaining how the grievance fits within the definition of "grievance" as
set forth in § 1, above. The employee's supervisor shall attempt to resolve the grievance
with the employee and shall submit his or her decision in writing to the employee within ten
(10) days after receipt of the grievance. The employee shall have the right to appeal the
decision of the supervisor to the Fire Chief.
B. Step II
1. If the grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction of the employee, the
grievant has seven (7) days following receipt of the written response from his or her
supervisor to file a written appeal to the Fire Chief or designated representative.
21
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.dcc
P-75
2. Written appeal to the Fire Chief or designated representative shall
consist of the statement of 4he grievance and shall include a statement by the grievant's
representative setting forth the reasons why the response of the employee's supervisor did
not satisfactorily resolve the grievance and an indication of the action desired by the
grievant. The written appeal shall explain why the grievance fits within the definition of
"grievance" as set forth in § 1, above.
3. After submission of the written appeal, the Fire Chief or designee shall
reply within three (3) days, in writing, to the grievant regarding the grievance. In event of
rejection, reasons for so doing will be included in the response.
C. Step III
1. If the grievance is not resolved to the satisfaction ofthe employee, the
grievant has seven (7) days following receipt of the written response from the Fire Chief or
designee to file a written appeal to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the District. The
CEO may designate a representative to act in his or her stead.
2. Written appeal to the CEO or designated representative shall consist
of the statement of the grievance and shall include a statement by the grievant's
representative setting forth the reasons why the response of the Fire Chief or designee did
not satisfactorily resolve the grievance, and an indication of the action desired by the
grievant. The written appeal shall explain why the grievance fits within the definition of
"grievance" as set forth in § 1 above.
3. After submission of the written appeal, the CEO or designee shall reply
in writing within fifteen (15) days, to the grievant regarding the grievance. The reasons for
the decision will be included in the response.
4. Section 1 PURPOSE defines a grievance as a claimed violation,
misinterpretation, misapplication or noncompliance with existing District codes, resolutions,
written rules, policies, procedures, orders and regulations, orthis document. The decision
by the CEO or designee shall address whether or not the complaint of the employee is
grievable pursuant to the grievance definition set forth in § 1 above and/or is timely filed or
otherwise administratively prosecuted in a timely basis. In the event that the CEO or
designee determines that the employee's complaint is not defined by § 1 above as a
grievance and/or is not timely filed or otherwise administratively prasecuted in a timely
basis, the CEO or designee shall advise the employee that the complaint is not grievable
and the grievance shall proceed no further unless or until on application by the employee, a
judgment is entered at the trial court level, indicative of the complaint being jurisdictionally
grievable pursuant to the definitions set forth in § 1 above and/or pursuant to requirements
of timeliness.
D. Step IV
1. If a grievance is not resolved by the CEO or designee and is deemed
"grievable" pursuant to these rules and regulations, (a defined grievance and/or timely)
then within seven (7) days of service by the CEO or designee of a grievance decision, the
employee may further appeal the matter by filing with the office of the CEO or his designee
a written appeal to binding arbitration. Said appeal shall be timely only if it is received in
22
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-76
the office of the CEO or designee not later than seven (7) days after service of the
grievable decision by the CEO or designee.
2. The employee's appeal shall state with specificity the identification of
the District Codes, resolutions, written rules or regulations or sections of this document
which is claimed to have been violated. The appeal shall additionally state with specificity
all allegations of facts upon which the grievance is based, and the specific relief sought.
3. Within ten (10) days after receipt of a valid appeal, the CEO or his
designee shall request of the California State Conciliation and Mediation Service, that it
submit a list of seven (7) arbitrators for hearing of the grievance. The CEO or designee
shall direct that a copy of the list of arbitrators be sent to the employee and to the CEO or
designee, as well.
4. Absent mutual selection of an arbitrator from either the submitted list
or otherwise, the arbitrator shall be chosen by an initial flip of the coin, with the prevailing
employee or CEO/designee having the option of making the first strike or directing that the
opposing party make the first strike. Following alternate striking, the one remairiing
arbitration candidate shall be deemed the appointed arbitrator.
5. The arbitrator shall conduct the hearing at a time and place mutually
agreed upon by the parties.
6. The hearing shall be memorialized by use of a certified shorthand
reporter. The shorthand reporter shall be selected by the employee.
All fees and expenses of the arbitrator shall be borne equally by the
parties.
8. All fees and expenses related to the securing of a representative
and/or legal counsel, the preparation of transcripts, witness fees and other expenses
attendant to the presentation of evidence, shall be borne by the party at whose direction
said expense is incurred.
9. The per diem fee of the shorthand reporter shall be borne equally by
the parties. The cost of transcription shall be borne by the party ordering the transcript.
10. Neither the Federal or California State Rules of Evidence shall be
binding upon evidentiary issues at the hearing. However, such authorities may be
considered by the arbitrator in rendering evidentiary rulings. Further, the California
Administrative Procedure Act shall specifically be of no application to the hearing process.
11. Although the Rules of Evidence shall not be strictly adhered to,
hearsay that would be inadmissible in a civil or criminal proceeding cannot in and of itself
support a finding by the arbitrator without corroboration. In general, the arbitrator shall
admit evidence which is of such reliability that reasonable persons rely upon it in the
conduct of serious matters such as the hearing.
12. The burdens of proof and production of evidence shall be borne by the
employee and shall be by a preponderance of the evidence.
13. Not later than ten (10) days prior to the date of commencement of the
hearing, the parties shall exchange lists of witnesses each intends to call at the hearing,
23
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-77
and a list of documents it intends to introduce at the hearing. Said documents shall be
attached to the notifications provided for herein, and the notifications shall actually be in
receipt of the opposing party on or before the tenth (10th) day prior to commencement of
the hearing. Failure to comply with said requirements shall result in exclusion of witness
testimony andlor rejection of exhibits not designated in the submissions.
14. The arbitrator shall be empowered to issue subpoenas for the
production of persons and documents. The arbitratorshall designate the subpoena form to
be utilized in such case. The California Code of Civil Procedure, the Evidence Code and
other applicable statutes shall apply to the validity and processing of subpoenas and to the
method of service of the same.
15. Not laterthan thirty (30} days after closure of the record, the arbitrator
shall render a binding opinion regarding the issues at dispute, and shall submit the binding
opinion to the employee, to the Fire Chief and to the Chief Executive Officer of the District.
16. The conduct of the arbitration proceedings shall be governed by this
MOU, and not by CCP § 1250 et seq.
ARTICLE V DISCIPLINE
District and Union have met and conferred and adopted a disciplinary procedure which
amends District Personnel Rule XXIV. This procedure conforms with California
Government Code Sections 3250-3262, commonly referred to as the "Firefighter's Bill of
Rights.
ARTICLE VI SAFETY
§ 1 Compliance
District and employees shall conform to and comply with all health, safety, and
sanitation requirements imposed by District, state or federal law or regulations adopted
under state or federal law.
§ 2 No Discrimination
No employee shall be in any way discriminated against as a result of reporting
any condition believed to be a violation of § 1 of this Article VI.
§ 3 Safety Equipment
Should the employment duties of an employee in the unit, in the estimation of
OSHA, require use of any equipment or gear to insure the safety of the employee or
others, District agrees to furnish such equipment nr gear.
§ 4 Employee Responsibility
In the course of performing their normally assigned work, employees will be
alert to observe unsafe practices, equipment, and conditions; as well as environmental
conditions in their immediate area which represent health hazards and will report such
conditions to their immediate supervisor. All employees shall make certain that all power
machinery is equipped with safety devices properly installed and in working condition and
24
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-78
that co-workers use utmost care in the handling of tools and equipment. Employees shall
report all accidents immediately to their immediate supervisors. Reports shall be submitted
on forms provided by District.
§ 5 Smokini~ Policy
Employees have agreed to accept and abide by the District "Smoking Policy",
as written and approved by the Chief in effect on July 1, 1996.
ARTICLE VII MANAGEMENT RIGHTS
§ 1 Scope of Rights
It is understood and agreed that District possesses the sole right and authority
to operate and direct the employees of District in all aspects, except as modified in this
Memorandum of Understanding. These rights include, but are not limited to:
A. The right to determine its mission, policies, and standards of service to be
provided to the public;
B. To plan, direct, control, and determine the operations or services to be
conducted by employees of District;
C. To determine the methods, means, and number of personnel needed to
carry out District's mission;
D. To direct the working forces;
E. To hire, assign, or transfer employees within District;
F. To promote, suspend, discipline, ar discharge employees;
G. To layoff or relieve employees due to lack of work or funds or for other
legitimate reasons, (any provision within this MOU, City rules or regulations or any other
policy or procedure promulgated by the City or any Department of the City which prohibits
the imposition of layoffs, is deemed null and void);
H. To make, publish, and enforce rules and regulations;
I. To introduce new or improved methods, equipment, or facilities;
J. To contract out for goods and services;
K. To take any and all actions as may be necessary to carry out the mission of
District in situations of civil emergency as may be declared by the Board of Directors or Fire
Chief;
L. To schedule and assign work; and,
M. To establish work and productivity standards.
§ 2 Emergencv Conditions
If in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors or Fire Chief it is determined
that extreme civil emergency conditions exist, including, but not limited to, riots, civil
disorders, earthquakes, floods, or other similar catastrophes, the provisions of this MOU
25
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-79
may be suspended during the time of the declared emergency, provided that wage rates
and monetary fringe benefits shall not be suspended.
ARTICLE VIII MAINTENANCE OF BENEFITS
All benefits enjoyed by the employees at the present time, which are not
included in nor specifically changed by this MOU, shall remain in full force and effect;
provided, however, that upon the mutual agreement of the parties, the meet and confer
process may be initiated to address proposed changes. This Article shall not be
interpreted as affecting any other rights or obligations the respective parties have under §
3500, et. seq., of the California Government Code.
ARTICLE iX APPROVAL BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
This MOU is subject to approval by the Board of Directors of District. The
parties hereto agree to perform whatever acts are necessary both jointly and separately to
urge the Board to approve and enforce this MOU in its entirety. Following approval of this
MOU by the Board, its terms and conditions shall be implemented by appropriate
ordinance, resolution, or other lawful action.
ARTICLE X PROVISIONS OF LAW
A. It is understood and agreed that this MOU and employees are subject to all
current and future applicable Federal and State laws and regulations and the current
provisions of District law. If any part or provisions of this MOU is in conflict or inconsistent
with such applicable provisions of those Federal, State, or District enactments or is
otherwise held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such
part or provision shall be suspended and superseded by such applicable law or
regulations, and the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected thereby. If any
substantive part or provision of this MOU is suspended or superseded, the parties agree to
re-open negotiations regarding the suspended or superseded part or provisions with the
understanding that the total compensation to employees under this MOU shall not be
reduced or increased as result of this Article.
B. The District and Fire MEG recognize that under this MOU and in personnel
matters not covered in this contract, the current District Personnel Rules as amended and
effective shall apply. The Personnel Rules applicable to Fire MEG shall not be changed for
the duration of this MOU,
ARTICLE XI TERM
The term of this MOU shall run from July 1, 2011, through and including 11:59
p.m. on June 30, 2014. On or about February 1, 2013, either party may reopen
negotiations with regard to salary and/or benefits, provided, however, there shall be no
changes to any wages, hours and/or other terms and conditions of employment without the
express written consent of both parties. In the event either party wishes to negotiate a
successor MOU, that party shall serve upon the other its proposals on or before February
1, 2014, and negotiations shall commence on or about February 15, 2014.
26
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 040711.doc
P-80
ARTICLE XII NEGOTIATION OF SUCCESSOR MOU
The parties agree that negotiation of a successorto this MOU shall commence
not later than six (6) months prior to the MOU expiration date. It is further agreed that in
order to facilitate the parties' goal of expeditiously completing the meet and confer process
on or before June 30, 2014, the parties shall exchange written meet and confer proposals
not later than February 1, 2014.
ARTICLE XIII PARITY PROVISION
If during the term of this MOU, the City/District initially negotiates and provides
an increase in base salary to the unit(s) represented by any other City/District recognized
employee organization(s), said increase shall also be made applicable to the unit
represented by the Association. This Article shall not apply to base salary increases which
are the result of a state or court mandates}, or settlement agreements which apply to
specific units other than that represented by the Association.
Fire MEG District
Dated
Donald Cloughesy, Battalion Chief
Mark Hartwig, Deputy Fire Chief
Dated
Jack Lam, City Manager
John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager
Approved by action of the Board of Directors the ~ day of
27
2011.
Fire MEG MOU FINAL 2010-2011 04071 1.doc
CITY OT RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Register
3/30/201 ]through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308329 3/30/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO INC 321,01
AP - 00308333 3/30/2011 ALPHAGRAPHICS ],569.31
AP - 00308333 3/30/201 I ALPHAGRAPHICS 172.30
AP - 00308333 3/30/201 I ALPHAGRAPHICS 139.23
AP - 00308336 3/30/2011 AMER]CAN TRAINING RESOURCES INC 1,086.58
AP - 00308337 3/30/2011 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 8,492.00
AP - 00308338 3/30/201 I ARMSTRONG, COURTNEY COREY 2,500.00
AP - 00308339 3/30/2011 ARNOLD, GRAY 750.00
AP - 00308340 3/30/2011 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATiON/MEMBERSHIP 123.75
AP - 00308341 3/30/2011 ASST SECURITY 470.40
AP - 00308341 3/30/2011 ASSI SECURITY 170.00
AP - 00308341 3/30/2011 ASST SECURITY 295.00
AP - 00308341 3/30/201 I ASST SECURITY 3,361.13
AP - 00308341 3/30/2011 ASST SECURITY 105.00
AP - 00308341 3!30/2011 ASSI SECURITY 165.00
AP - 00308341 3/30/20! 1 ASSI SECURITY ~ 385.00
AP - 00308341 3/30/2011 ASSI SECURITY 2]0.00
AP - 00308343 3/30/2011 AURORA PICTURES INC. 420.75
AP - 00308344 3/30/2011 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. !05.68
AP - 00308345 3/30/201 I AVANTS, MARGE 180.00
AP - 00308346 3/30/2011 B & M LAWN AND GARllEN CENTER 7,402.61
AP - 00308346 3/30/2011 B & M LAWN AND GARDEN CENTER 31,512.51
AP - 00308347 3/30/2011 B3 BACKFLOW INC. 22.03
AP - 00308348 3/30/2011 BALDEON, CARLOS 25.00
AP - 00308349 3/30/201 I BARNES AND NOBLE 43.41
AP - 00308349 3/30/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 29.54
AP - 00308349 3/30/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 331.89
AP - 00308349 3/30/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 29.54
AP - 00308350 3/30/2011 BIA BALDY VIEW CHAPTER 69.00
AP - 00308351 3/30/2011 BIERMAN, V. MICHELLE 650.00
AP - 00308352 3/30/2011 BLANDINO, CANDICE 80.00
AP - 00308353 3/30/2011 BLUESILVER VIDEO PRODUCTIONS ],200.00
AP - 00308355 3/30/2011 C H STONE PLUMBING CO INC 1,000.00
AP - 00308356 3/30/2011 CABLE INC. 378.00
AP - 00308356 3/30/2011 CABLE INC. 252.00
AP - 00308357 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 881.20
AP - 00308358 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 570.90
AP - 00308358 3/30/201 I CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 919.00
AP - 00308358 3!30/201 I CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY 919.00
AP - 00308359 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 131,492.51
AP - 00308359 3/30/2011 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES 486.52
AP - 00308360 3/30/2011 CAPITAL BUILDERS HARDWARE INC. 228.57
AP - 00308362 3/30/2011 CASTILLQ, MARIA TERESA 20.00
AP - 00308363 3/30/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 38.15
AP - 00308363 3/30/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 132.24
AP-00308363 3/30/2011 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 104.50
AP - 00308364 3/30/201 I CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 304.50
AP - 00308364 3/30/2011 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 13.05
AP - 00308366 3/30/2011 CHOI, BUM CHUL 100.00
AP - 00308367 3/30/20! 1 CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 84.00
AP - 00308368 3/30/201 I CLARK, KAREN ~ 288.00
AP - 00308369 3/30/2011 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 53.01
AP - 00308369 3/30/2011 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 373.02
AP - 003083?0 3/30/2011 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 126.90
P-81
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Dale: 04/13/201
Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/201 I
Check No. Check Date Vendor Nnme Amoun[
AP - 00308371 3/30/20] 1 CLIMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 633.33
AP - 00308372 3/30/2011 COAST RECREATION INC 228.80
AP - 00308373 3/30/2011 COASTLINE DEVELOPMENT INC 5,000.00
AP - 00308374 3/30/2011 COCHERELL, DOREEN 108.00
AP - 00308376 3/30/2011 CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,883.76
AP - 00308376 3/30/2011 CONTACT SECURITY INC 5,490.66
AP - 00308376 3/30/2011 CONTACT SECURITY INC 1,880.30
AP - 00308376 3/30/201 I CONTACT SECURITY INC 9,872.40
AP - 00308377 3/30/2011 COOPER, CHERYL 550.80
AP - 00308377 3/30/2011 COOPER, CHERYL 30.00
AP - 00308378 3/30/2011 CKOP PRODUCTION` SERVICES INC 798.23
AP - 00308378 3/30/201 I CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC ~ 1,022.79
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 278.11
AP - 00308380 3!301201 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.36
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.21
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.32
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 52.91
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.25
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WA'fEK DISTRICT 91.86
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,832.51
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCADIONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.58
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.33
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.24
AP - 00308380 3!30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 202.69
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.52
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 100.33
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.44
AP - 00308380 3!30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 39.32
AP-00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.47
AP-00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTKICT 136.59
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 132.14
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.95
AP - 00308380 3!30/201 I CUCAMONGA. VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 120.56
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,246.78
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46.12
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 42.04
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DTSTRICT 59.89
AP - 00308380 3/30/201 t CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.40
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT' 1,728.68
AP - 00308380 3!307201 ] CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,494.65
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,445.59
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 603.64
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.99
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 814.72
AP - 00308380 3!30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 586.22
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.99
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 743.26
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 884.48
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 46,12
P-82
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 2
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_POK7-KA[T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p_83
Agenda Check Register
3/30/2011 though 4/12/201 I
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name ~ Amount
AY - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.08
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 59.89
AP - 00308380 3!30/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 542.13
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 892.07
AP - 00308380 3/30/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.13
AP - 00308381 3/30/2011 CURRY, KAREN 1,000.00
AP - 00308382 3/30/2011 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 494.28
AP - 00308382 3/30/201 l D AND K CONCRETECOMPP.NY 328.43
AP - 00308352 3/30/2011 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 777.57
AP - 00308383 3/30/201 I DeGUZMAN, DENISE 100.00
AY - 00308384 3/30/201 I DGO AUTO DETAILING 270.00
AP - 00308384 3/30/2011 DGO AUTO DE'AILING 135.00
AP - 00308385 3/30/2011 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 212.59
AP - 00308387 3/30/2011 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 184.39
AP - 00308387 3/30/2011 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 109.05
AP - 00308388 3/30/201 I DUNK, ANNE MARIE 846.00
AP - 00308388 3/30/2011 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 96.00
AP - 00308389 3/30/2011 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 4,000.15
AP - 00308390 3/30/2011 EARTHWORKS SOIL AML-NDMENTS INC. 2,312.21
AP - 00308391 3/30/2011 EASTEKLING, RAY 624.00
AP - 00308392 3!30/2011 EBSCO 3.57
AP - 00308393 3/30/201 l ELLIS ENTERPRISES 2,500.00
AP - 00308393 3/30/201 I ELLIS ENTERPRISES 75.00
AP - 00308393 3/30/201 I EC.LIS ENTERPRISES - 150.00
AP - 00308393 3!30/2011 ELLIS ENTERPRISES 980.00
AP - 00308394 3/30/201 I EMBROIDME 63.62
AP - 00308395 3130/20! l ERICKSON, KRISTEN 250.00
AP - 00308396 3/30/2011 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 104.40
AP - 00308397 3/30/201 I FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 24.06
AP - 00308397 3/30/201 I FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 26.74
AP - 00308398 3/30/201 t FENCE CRAF~ I' OF UPLAND INC 1,990.18
AP - 00308404 3/30/2011 FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 55.73
AP - 00308405 3/30/2011 GARCIA, JEREMY 45.00
AP - 00308406 3/30/201 I GENTRY, DONALD A 690.00
AP - 00308406 3/30/201 I GENTRY, DONALD A 1,000.00
AP - 00308406 3/30/2011 GENTRY, DONALD A 763,75
AP - 00308407 3/30/2011 CEOGRAPHICS 228.38
AP - 00308408 3/30/2011 GIORDANO; MARLANNA 300.00
AP - 00308409 3130/20 t I GRAINGER 976.36
AP - 00308409 3/30/2011 GRAINGER 173.24
AP - 00308409 3/30/2011 GRAINGER 311.87
AP - 00308409 3/30/2011 GRAINGER 61.99
AP - 00308409 3/30/2011 GRAINGER 33.90
AP - 003084] 1 3/30/2011 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 400.00
AP - 00308412 3/30/2011 HAY, SHARON ! 65.00
AP - 00308413 3/30/2011 HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 134.44
AP - 00308414 3/30/2011 HEARTSAVERS LLC 110.00
AP - 00308417 3/30/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 52.78
AP - 00308418 3/30/2011 HOPE OF A HIGHER GLORY 200.00
AP - 00308419 3/30/2011 HORRIGAN EN7ERPRISES INC. 56.25
AP - 00308420 3/30/20! I HOSE MAN INC 127.40
AP - 00308421 3/30/2011 HOUSE OF RUTH 394.78
AP - 00308423 3/30/2011 HUGHES, RANCE 24.48
AP - 00308424 ~ 3/30/2011 HUNTINGTON HARDWARE 124.46
_
_ _
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_POK'1'KAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: liS3:4
CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-84
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name AmounC
AP - 00308425 3/30/201 t IAAP 128.00
AP - 00308425 3/30/2011 IAAP 128.00
AP - 00308426 3!30/2011 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 1,013.82
AP - 00308427 3/30/2011 IMSA 940.00
AP - 00308428 3!30/20! 1 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 5,734.00
AP - 00308428 3!30/20! 1 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 2,881.50
AP - 00308428 3/30/201 I INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIC 1,886.50
AP - 00308429 3/30/201 I INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOAT 787.62
AP - 00308429 3!30/201 I INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOA] 13.00
AP - 00308430 3/30/201 I INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 473.41
AP - 00308430 3/30/201 I INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 350.00
AP - 00308430 3/30/2011 INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE iNC 396.00
AP - 00308430 3/30/2011 INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 396.00
AP - 00308431 3/30/2011 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 50.00
AP - 00308434 3/30/2011 JOHNSON LIFT HYSTER 4,301.85
AP - 00308435 3/30/201 t JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 903.16
AP - 00308436 3!3012011 JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,377.50
AP - 00308437 3/30/2011 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 153,029.77
AP - 00308437 3/30/201 t KAISER.FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 4,103.23
AP - 00308437 3/30/2011 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 2,524.10
AP - 00308438 3/30/2011 KC PRINTING & GRAPHICS 83.14
AP - 00308440 3/30/2011 KORMX INC 14,205.42
AP - 00308443 3/30/2011 LINNELL, SHERRY 500.00
AP - 00308444 3/30/2011 LOS ANGELES TIMES 12.00
AP - 00308445 3/30/2011 MADAHAR, DEEPTI 30.00
AP - 00308446 3/30/2011 MANNING ELECTRIC INC !,871.06
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5;511.22
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,988.67
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC ~ 2, l 11.08
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,754.44
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 176.77
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 643.86
AP - 00308447 3/30/20( l MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,159.53
AP - 00308447 3/30/201 I MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 647.88
AP - 00308447 3/30/201 I MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 896.15
AP - 00308447 3/30/201 I MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52
AP - 00308447 3/30/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 12,197.13
AP - 00308448 3/30/201 I MAUK, MELISSA 264.00
AP - 00308449 3/30/201 I MCKINLEY ELEVATOR CORP 271.75
AP - 00308450 3/30/2011 MCWELCO PRODUCTS 679.69
AP - 00308451 3/30/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 74.98
AP - 00308451 3/30/2011 MIDWEST TAPL• 116.97
AP - 00308451 3/30/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 76.34
AP - 00308451 3/30/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 194.07
AP - 00308452 3/30/2011 MISSION REPROGRAPHICS 1,074.67
AP - 00305452 3/30/2011 MISSION REPROGRAPHICS 636.25
AP - 00308452 3/30/201 ] MISSION REPROGRAPHICS 1,820.37
AP - 00308453 3/30/2011 MRW & ASSOCIATES LLC 4,537.50
AP - 00308453 3/3062011 MRW & ASSOCIATES LLC 683.88
AP - 00308454 3/30/2011 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING 706.88
AP - 00308454 3/30/2011 NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING 534.78
AP - 00308455 3/30/2011 NEWPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 504.00
AP - 00308458 3/30/2011 NEXUS IS INC 7,888.67
AP - 00308458 3/30/2011 NEXUS [S INC
~ _ 1,288.80
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK AGENDA_R EG_PORTRA[T _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tinte: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Ret:~ster
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoun[
AP - 00308459 3/30/2011 NGO, JOSEPH 300.00
AP - 00308460 3/30/2011 SOUTHLAND OPERA 700.00
AP - 00308461 3/30/2011 NPI PRODUCTION SERVICES [NC 38,200.00
AP - 00308462 3!30/201 I O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION INC 45,825.58
AP - 00308462 3/30/2011 O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION INC -0,582.55
AP - 00308462 3/30/20! 1 O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION INC 70,961.00
AP - 00308462 3/30/2011 O'DONNELL CONSTRUCTION iNC -7,096.10
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 26.68
AP - 00308463 3/30/20! 1 OFFICE DEPOT 26.67
AP - 00308463 3/30/20! 1 OFFICE DEPOT ~ 28.60
AP - 00308463 3/30/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 20.45
AP - 00308463 3/30/20! 1 OFFICE DEPOT 81.00
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT ~ 23.96
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 141.81
AP - 00308463 3/30/20! 1 OFFICE DEPOT 20.34
AP - 00308463 3/30/201 f OFFICE DEPOT 22.84
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 51.73
AP - 00308463 3/30/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 6.29
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 8.41
AP - 00308463 3!30/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 6C,.11
AP - 00308463 3/30/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 3.83
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 9.50
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 0.85
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 7.04
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 17.47
AP - 00308463 3730/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1.56
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 35.84
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 88.94
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 7.96
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 70.44
AP - 00308463 3730/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 174.79
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 15.65
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 27.04
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 24.43
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 62.41
AP - 00308463 3/30/201 ] OFFICE DEPOT 58.96
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 135.38
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 1.90
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 63.98
AP - 00308463 3/30/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 61.74
AP - 00308464 3/30/2011 ORONA, PATRICIA 1,125.00
AP - 00308464 3/30/2011 ORONA, PATRICIA 750.00
AP - 00308465 3/30/2011 OTT, LAURA 564.00
AP - 00308465 3/30/2011 OTT, LAURA 141.00
AP - 00308465 3/30/2011 OTT, LAURA 45.00
AP - 00308465 3/3072011 OTT, LAURA 255.00
AP - 00308466 3/30/2011 OTT, SHARON 360.00
AP - 00308466 3/30/2011 OTT, SHARON 180.00
AP - 00308467 3/30/201 I PACIFIC TRUCK EQUIPMENT 4,938.75
AP - 00308470 3/30/201 ] R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 973.46
AP - 00308472 3/30/2011 RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGH SCHOOL 500.00
AP - 00308477 3/30/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ~ 53,431.25
AP - 00308477 3/30/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 53,431.25
AP - 00308478 3/30/201 I SAN BERNARDINQ CITY OF 487.61
P-85
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Dale: 04/13/201
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p_gg
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 [hrough4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308479 3/30/2011 SAX 4 GOll PRODUCTIONS 100.00
AP - 0030848] 3/30/201 I SCARPING, MATT 2,500.00
AP - 00308482 3/30/2011 SCLLN INC 35.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 122.40
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 36.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 156.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 97.80
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 101.40
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 147.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 140.40
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 162.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 81.00
AP - 00308484 3/30/2011 SENECHAL, CALVIN 129.60
AP - 00308485 3/30/2011 SHU IAN, WEI 81.00
AP - 00308486 3!30/201 I SIGN SHOP, TI{E 304.25
AP - 00308487 3/30/2011 SILVER, EDNA 520.00
AP - 00308487 3/30/2011 SILVER, EDNA 520.00
AP - 00308488 3/30/2011 SLIGHTLY SMALLER FLLMS 1,997.00
AP - 00308489 3/30/2011 HOYT LUMBER COMPANY 7.82
AP - OD308490 3/30/2011 SMITH, BARBARA 252.00
AP - 00308490 3/30/2011 SMITH, BARBARA 240.00
AP - 00308490 3/30/2011 SMITH, BARBARA 204.00
AP - 00308490 3/30/2011 SMITH, BARBARA 276.00
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY ~ 4.93
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,518.16
AP - 0030849 t 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 288.54
AP - OD30849I 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 258.60
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 635.12
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4.77
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4.77
AP - 00308491 3/30/201 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5.61
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,643.05
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,761.37
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 958.58
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,273.19
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 7.96
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 431.01
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6,186.89
AP - 0030849 ] 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.79
AP - 00308491 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 8.65
AP - 00308492 3/30/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,110.02
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 $OUTFIGRN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,160.95
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 285.12
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.83
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.23
AP - 00308497 3!30/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.19
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 13638
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 136.54
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 46.20
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.07
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.73
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.82
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 04/13/20!
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p-g7
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through4/12/2011
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.73
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.20
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 16.33
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.04
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.76
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA~EDISON 240.45
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.23
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.73
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 26.34
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.87
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44
AP - C0303497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.18
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 27.79
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 126.71
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.52
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.23
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.85
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.61
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.72
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 45.26
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.30
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.83
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 28.05
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.96
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 110.56
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 1.43
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.58
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 619.90
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 122.61
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.72
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.72
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISOIV 21.36
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.69
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.69
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.57
AP - 00308497 3/30
/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
~ ~ 24.52 _
_
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Dale: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/20! l
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON !34.68
AP - 00308497 3/30/20! 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.93
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.26
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.19
AP - 00308497 3!30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 22.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/20! I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.87
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.25
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.76
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2 L84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.87
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 187.05
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALffORN1A EDISON 24.72
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.12
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 22.82
AP • 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.09
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.51
AP - 00308497 3/30/20(1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.36
AP - 00308497 3/30/20! 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.73
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON . 54.12
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN' CALIFORNIA EDISON - 22.73
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 49.43
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.61
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 104.70
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 258.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.98
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.61
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.59
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.95
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.03
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.1(
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNA GDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/20! 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.71
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9735
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.11
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISOIJ 48.52
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2332
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308497 3!30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.25
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.35
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.18
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 21.11
P-88
Uaer: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAI"1'_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p_gg
A¢enda Check Re¢ister
3/30/2011 through4/12/2011
Check No. Check Dale Veudor Namc Amount
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 46.19
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 4,662.46
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 22.62
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,907.16
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BDISON 2L84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.61
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.97
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 276.95
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 264.36
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.93
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA F,DISON 23.52
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.97
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 366.94
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.67
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EllISON 46.14
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFCRNIA EDISON 79.05
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.08
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHL-RN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 92.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.39
AP - 00308497 3!30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 133.40
AP - 00308497 3/30/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.72
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 216.75
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 '3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.82
AP - 00308497 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 118.72
AP - 00308498 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 44.89
AP - 00308498 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.94
AP - 00308499 3/30/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,682.97
AP - 00308500 3/30/2011 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 690.00
AP - 00308501 3/30/2011 SOUTHWEST CONSTRUCTION CO INC -4,000.34
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 1,127.13
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO - 11,918.41
AP - 00308502 3/30/201 ] - SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 39,197.31
AP - 00308502 3/30/201 ] SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 36.49
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 150.45
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRiGA'1'IO 9,592.60
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 2,269.11
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATIO 8,648.34
AP - 00308502 3/30/2011 SPECTRUM CARE LANDSCAPE AND IRRiGATIO 1,881.69
AP - 00308503 3/30/2011 SPINITAR ~ 234.81
AP - 00308504 3/30/2011 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 13,090.84
AP - 00308504 3!30/2011 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,732.78
AP - 00308505 3/30/2011 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION ~ 939.16
_
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 1 x:53:4
CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-90
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308506 3/30/20 ] 1 STERICYCLE INC 35.92
AP - 00308507 3/30/2011 STRONG, KIM 66.00
AP - 00308509 3/30/2011 T AND G ROOFING COMPANY INC 16,350.00
AP~-00308510 3/30/201! TACO BELL 300.37
AP - 00308512 3/30/201 t THREE VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.00
AP - 00308513 3/30/201 t TOLL BROS INC 1,000.00
AP - 00308514 3/30/20] I TOMARK SPORTS INC 276.60
AP - 00308515 3/30/201 I TRACEY, VAL 384.00
AP - 00308515 3/30/2011 TRACEY, VAL 345.60
AP - 00308516 3/30/201 I TRACKDOWN MANAGEMENT SERVICES 100.00
AP - 00308517 3/30/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 46.20
AP - 00308517 3/30120] 1 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 36.24
AP - 00308517 3/30/201 l UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 110.20
AP - 00308517 3/30/201 l UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE- 577.96
AP - 00308517 3/30/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 9.96
AP - 00308517 3/30/201 l UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 762.51
AP - 00308517 3/30/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85
AP - 00308517 3/30/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85
AP - 00308517 3/30/2011 UNIFIKS'I UNIFORM SERVICE 123.64
AP - 00308517 3!30/201 I UNIFIKSI' UNIFORM SERVICE 123.64
AP - 00308518 3/30/20 t 1 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 270.32
AP - 00308513 3/30/201 I UTd10N BANK OF CALIFORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 3,108.56
AP - 003085 l9 3/301201 I UNION BANK OF CALffORNIA TRUSTEE FOR P. 49,555.54
AP - 00308520 3/30/2011 UNITED FENCE ERECTORS 2,500.00
AP - 00308521 3/30/201 I UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 6,331.00
AP - 00308521 3/30/2011 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,555.00
AP - 00308522 3/30/201 l UNITED S[TE SERVICES OF CA INC 10.69
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 79.39
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VER[ZON 33.51
AP - 003D3525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 74.04
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 76.37
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 499.57
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 1 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 1 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 386.88
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERIZON 884.22
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308525 3!30/2011 VERIZON 18.57
AP - 00308525 3!30/2011 VERIZON 22.17
AP - 00308525 3!30/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 l VERIZON l 14.54
AP - 00308525 3/30/20 L L VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERiZON 35.69
AP-00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERI7_ON ~ 79.14
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERiZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 122.77
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 18.57
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VER[ZON 37.01 __
___
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_YOK'CRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Tlme: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor_Name Amount
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308525 3/30/20! 1 VERIZON 20. ] 6
AP - 00308525 3/30/201 I VERIZON 67.54
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 584.78
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 475.75
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 114.64
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VERIZON 40.02
AP - 00308525 3/30/2011 VER[ZON ~ 475.75
AP - 00308526 3/30/2011 VERIZON - 86.47
AP - 00308527 3/30/201 I VILLENAS, FABIAN 71.00
AP - 00308528 3/30/2011 VISTA PAINT 725.25
AP - 00308529 3/30/2011 W.E. O'NEIL CONSTRUCTION CO 5,000.00
AP - 00308531 3/30/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,098.38
AP - 00308531 3/30/201 I WALTERS WHOLESALE- ELECTRIC CO 358.88
AP - 00308532 3/30/20] 1 WAXIE SANTTARY SUPPLY 1,519.53
AP - 00308532 3/30120] 1 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,496.10
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 52.58
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANI7'AKY SUPPLY 2,075.82
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 34.95
AP - 00308532 3/30/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 136.26
AP - 00308533 3/30/2011 WEIR, JEWELL 585.00
AP - 00308534 3/30/2011 WESCO RECENABLES CORP 230.55
AP - 00308535 3/30/2011 WIDLE, MAURICE 500.00
AP - 00308537 3/30/201 I YANCY, MICHELLE 310.00
AP - 00308537 3/30!201 I YANCY, MICHELLE 56.10
AP - 00308538 3/30/2011 ZIRGES, ARLENE 288.00
AP - 00308538 3/30/2011 ZIRGES, ARLENE 195.00
AP - 00308538 3/30/2011 ZIRGES, ARLENE 180.00
AP-00308540 3/31/2011 USPS 1,243.07
AP - 00308541 3/31/2011 ABC LOCKSMITHS 12723
AP-00308541 3/31/2011 ARC LOCKSMITHS 63.62
AP - 00308542 3/31/2011 AIRGAS WEST 247.25
AP - 00308543 3/31/2011 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 246.25
AI' - 00308543 3/31/2011 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 3,026.38
AP - 00308543 3/31/2011 B AND K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 45.54
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 56.58
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 l BRODART BOOKS 15.71
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 I BRODART BOOKS 6.69
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODAR7' BOOKS 6.69
AP - 00308545 3/3 U2011 BRODART BOOKS 49.46
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.69
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 12.82
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 t BRODART BOOKS 13.53
AP - 00308545 3/31!201 I BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 t BRODART BOOKS 6.69
AP-00308545 3/3!/201] BRODARTBOOKS 47.40
AP-00308545 3/31/2011 BRODARTBOOKS 14.67
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 41.36
AP - 00308545 3/31!2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.67
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 48.63
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.67
P-91
User; VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: I 1 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 27.78
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 62.42
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 14.67
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 2247
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 48.05
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 35.62
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 I BRODART BOOKS 52.94
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 1464
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 212.38
AP - 00308545 3/31/20 ] 1 BRODART BOOKS 48.63
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 I BRODART BOOKS 6.69
AP - 00308545 3/31 /2011 BRODART BOOKS 76.07
AY - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 ] BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 22.55
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 31.57
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 20.07
AP-00308545 3/31/2011 BRODARTBOOKS 64.76
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 28.82
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 82.81
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/201 I BRODART BOOKS 22.40
AP • 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 13.53
AP - 00308545 3/3 U2011 BRODART BOOKS 26.23
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 27.78
AP-00308545 3/31/2011 BRODARTBOOKS 17.61
AP - 00308545 3/31/2011 BRODART BOOKS 67.41
AP - 00308546 3/3 U2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308546 3/31/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308547 3/31/201 1 DAPPER TIRE CO 471.28
AP - 00308548 3/31/2011 DEKRA-CITE INDUSTRIES INC 2,687.34
AP - 00308549 3/31/20] 1 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 716.09
AP - 00308549 3/31/201 l EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 62.84
AP - 00308550 3/31/201 i GOLF VENTURES WEST 108.06
AP - 00308551 3/31/201 I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00
AP - 00308551 3/31/20] 1 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50.00
AP - 00308551 3/31/20! I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 981.49
AP - 00308551 3/31/201 I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO [NC 127.65
AP - 00308551 3/31/20 ] I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 452.62
AP - 00308552 3/31/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 178.00
AP - 00308552 3/31/20] 1 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 2737
AP - 00308552 3/31/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 403.89
AP - 00308553 3/31/201 I INTERSTATE BATTERIES 98.57
AP - 00308553 3/31 /2011 INTERSTATE BATTERIES -17.61
AP - 00308554 3/31/20] I LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC 193.21
AP - 00308555 3/31/201 I LTMS AUTO INC 38.36
AP - 00308555 3/31/2011 LIMS AUTO INC 461.69
AP - 00308555 3/31/201 I LIMS AUTO INC 38.36
AP - 00308555 3/31/2011 LIMS AUTO INC 38.36
P-92
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 12 ~ Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout ~ Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCI3O CUCAMONGA P-93
Aeenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308556 3/31/201( REPUBLIC ITS 12,104 .00
AP - 00308557 3/31/2011 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 3,654 .00
AP - 00308558 3/31/201 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 623 .45
AP - 00308558 3/31/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,615 .13
AP - 00308558 3/31/201 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,728 .48
AP - 00308558 3/31/2011 TRUGRL-•EN LANDCARL 247 .43
AP - 00308558 3/31/20] t TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,186 .64
AP - 00308558 3/31/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,556 .32
AP - 00308558 3/31/20( l TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,569 .60
AP - 00308558 3/31/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,406 .68
AP - 00308558 3/31!201 I TRUGREEN LANDCARE 19,873 .90
AP - 00308558 3/31/2011 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 401 .25
AP - 00308559 4/6/2011 A] AUTOMOTIVE 499 .64
AP - 00308559 4/6/2011 Al AUTOMOTIVE 468 .77
AP - 00308560 4/6/2011 AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO MC 18 .94
AP - 00308561 4/6/2011 ADLETRONICS 256 .05
AP - 0030856! 4/6/20! 1 ABLETRONICS 54 .09
AP - 00308561 4/6/2011 ABLETRONICS ~ 12 .32
AP - 00308562 4/6/2011 ABM JANITORIAL SW 929 .24
AP - 00308563 4/6/2011 ADAPT' CONSULTING INC 470 .81
AP - 00308563 4!6/2011 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 443 .19
AP - 00308563 4/6/2011 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 470 .81
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADORE ANIMAI. HOSPITAL 25 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6!2011 ADOBE ANIMAL IIOSP[TAL 25 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANRv1Al HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00305564 4/6/20] I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/201 ] ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPTTAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/201 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308564 4/6/2011 ADOBE ANIMAL IOSPITAL 50 .00
AP - 00308565 4/6/201 I ADT (TYCO) SECURITY 5 .00
AP - 00308566 4/6/201 I AFLAC 7,567 .64
AP - 00308567 4/6/201 I AGILB~IE INC 1,220 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 60 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6!2011 AGILINE INC 80 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 1,540 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6!2011 AGILINE INC 720 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6/201 l AGILINE INC 80 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6/201 I AGILINE INC 320 .00
AP - 00308567 4/6/2011 AGILINE INC 20 .00
AP - 00308569 4!6/2011 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 19,955 .95
AP - 00308570 4/6/2011 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 3,638 .01
AP - 00308572 4/6/2011 AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES INC. 280 .00
AP - 00308573 4/6/2011 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 144,335 .55
AP - 00308574 4/6/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3 .35
AP - 00308574 4/6/201( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES __ 3 .35
__
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: l3 Current Date : 04/13/20]
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTKAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308574 4/6/2011 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35
AP - 00308575 416/201 1 AREAA INLAND EMPIRE 980.00
AP - 00308575 4/6/201 I AREAA INLAND EMPIRE 140.00
AP - 00308576 4/6/2011 ASAP POWERSPORTS 957.25
AP - 00308576 4/6/2011 ASAP POWERSPOR'I'S 985.00
AP - 00305576 4/6/2011 ASAP POWERSPORTS 280.00
AP - 00308577 4/6/2011 AUFBAU CORPORATION 14,230.00
AP - 00308578 416/201 I AURORA PICTURES INC. 37 L25
AP - 00308579 4/6/2011 BALNEG, RAFAEi, 71.40
AP - 00308579 4/6/2011 BALNEG, RAFAEL (74.44
AP - 00308580 4/6/2011 BANKS, MARSHA 7,418.13
AP - 00308581 4/6/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 389.10
AP - 00308581 4/6/2011 BARNES AND NOBLE 99.04
AP - 00308582 4/6/2011 BEACON POINTS CONDOMINIUM 195.00
AP - 00308583 4/6/2011 BERMINGHAM, GENEVIEVE G. 125.00
AP - 00308584 4/6/2011 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 156.69
AP - 00308585 4/6/2011 BISFIOP COMPANY 270.73
AP - 00308586 4/6/2011 BOLTON, HEATHER 51.51
AP - 00308588 4/6/2011 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPi.Y 3.06
AP - 00308589 4/6/2011 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 673.53
AP - 00308591 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STAT 17.93
AP - 00308592 4(6/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 397.35
AP - 00308593 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 325.1 ]
AP - 00308594 4!6/201 I CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE -CAX BOARD 50.00
AP - 00308595 4/6/201 I CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 50.00
AP - 00308596 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 25.00
AP - 00308597 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 44.56
AP - 00308598 4/6/201 I CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 100.00
AP - 00308599 4/6/2011 GALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00
AP - 00308600 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 632.94
AP - 00308601 4/6/2011 CALIFORNIA SHOPPING CART RETRIEVAL COP 70.00
AP - 00308602 4!6/201 1 CASH, PAUL 500.00
AP - 00308603 4/6/2011 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 320.81
AP - 00308604 4/6/2011 CHEF DAVE'S CAFE AND CATERING 1,025.00
AP - 00308605 4/6/2011 CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 175.00
AP - 00308606 4/6/2011 CLASSY, SANDRA 1,000.00
AP - 00308607 4/6/201 ] CLARKS PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 95.70
AP - 00308608 4/6/201 ] CLEARWATER GRAPHICS 1,]83.20
AP - 00308609 4/6/201 I CLIMATEC BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES GROUP 542.50
AP - 00308610 4/6/2011 COELHO, TERRIE ~ 70.00
AP - 00308611 4/6/2011 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY 253.78
AP - 00308612 4/6/2011 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 290.00
AP - 00308614 4/6/201 1 CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPS 103.98
AP - 00308614 4/6/20] 1 CONTBQENTAL AMERICAN RJSURANCE COMPS 16.39
AP - 00308615 4/6/2011 COP TOWN UNIFORMS INC. 226.09
AP - 00308616 4/6/201 I COST RECOVERY SYSTEMS [NC 9,250.00
AP - 00308618 4/6/2071 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.48
AP - 00308618 4/6!2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 22,53
AP - 00308618 4/6/20] 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY L4ATER DISTRICT 494.00
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTR[C1' 171.77
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,478.02
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 19 L40
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,014.66
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 90.50
P-94
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez ~ Page: 14
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-95
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/201111uough 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 L CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ]58.06
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.81
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 256.49
AP-00308618 4!612011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 54.76
AP-003086i8 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00308618 4/61201 t CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.41
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 721.52
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.77
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.28
AP - 00308618 4!6/201 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 174.64
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 l CUCAMUNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 330.36
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 117.57
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 196.47
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 421.16
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.67
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMUNGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 633.24
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.40
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26.60
AP - 003086]8 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 59.89
AP - 00308613 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 48.83
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3932
AP - 00306618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2R I,1 ]
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 136.51
AP - 00308618 4/6(2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 43.25
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 359.60
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 421.16
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 322.15
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 247.26
AP - 00308618 416/201 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.28
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.1 I
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 37.96
AP - 00308618 4!6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.13
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 233.47
AP-00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRICT 102.73
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 75.55
AP - 00308618 4/6(2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.95
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1 12.25
AP - 00308618 4/6(2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 47.47
AP • 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 112.30
AP - 003086]8 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 166.49
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 231.87
AP - 00308618 4/6/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 192.91
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 298.04
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.11
AP - 00308618 4/6/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 94.50
AP - 00308619 4/6/2011 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 392.59
AP - 00308619 4/6/2011 D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 777.57
AP - 00308620 4/6/2011 D&R RENTAL 284.00
AP - 00308621 4/6/2011 DAVEY RESOURCE GROUP 1,000.00
AP - 00308622 4/6/2011 DC CONNECT INC 5,000.00
AP - 00308623 416/2011 DELGADO, RUDY __ A 75.00
_
_
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 15 Current Date: 04/13/201
Repar[:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Poruait Layout Time: li:63:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-96
Agenda Check Register
3/30/2011 [hrough4/12/2011
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308624 4/6/2011 DELTA DENTAL 39,786.99
AP - 00308625 4/6/2011 DENISON UNIVERSITY 1,000.00
AP - 00308626 4;6/2011 DENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 4440
AP - 00308627 4/6/2011 DEPARTMENT OP CONSUMER AFFAIRS 250.00
AP - 00308628 4/6/2011 DISCOVERY VILLIAGE HOA 300.00
AP - 00308629 4/6/201 ] DORNING INC, GLENN B 966.15
AP - 00308630 4/6/2011 EASTER, PAMELA 802.38
AP - 00308630 4/6/2011 EASTER, PAMELA 246.82
AP - 00308631 4/6/2011 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 212.06
AP - 00308632 4/6/2011 EMPIRE LINE-X 569.69
AP - 00308633 4/6/201 I EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 1,350.00
AP - 00308634 4/6/201 I EN POINTS TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 94.83
AP - 00308635 4/6/201 ] ENTERSECT CORP 53.70
AP - 00308636 4/6/2011 ESKENA7.I, NOISES 93.29
AP - 00308636 4/6/2011 ESKENAZI, NOISES 12.60
AP - 00308636 4/6/201 ] ESKENAZI, NOISES 180.00
AP - 00308637 4/6/2011 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 27.18
AP - 00308638 4/6/2011 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 100.81
AP - 00308638 4/6/2011 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 264.76
AP - 00308639 4/6/2011 FAS"PENAL COMPANY 59.98
AP - 00308640 4; 6/2011 FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC .985.42
AP - 00308642 4(6!2011 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 250.00
AP - 00308643 4/6/2011 FORD OF UPLAND [NC 36.94
AP - 00308643 4/6/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 42.24
AP - 00308643 4/6/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC 138.37
AP - 00308643 4!6/2011 FORD OF UPLAND INC -9.50
AP - 00308644 4/6/2011 GALA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 18.00
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 523.45
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 215.68
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 26.99
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 12. t 1
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GALE GROUP,THE 29.57
AP - 00308646 416/201 l GAZCA, VANESSA 36.00
AP - 00308647 4/6/2011 GENTRY, DONALD A 1,543.75
AP - 00308648 4/6/2011 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00
AP - 00308645 4/6/2011 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 180.00
AP - 00308649 4/6/2011 GOTHIC MOON PRODUCTIONS INC. 16,517.78
AP - 00308650 4/6/2011 GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,500.00
AP - 00308651 4/6/201 t GRAINGER 50.35
AP - 00308651 4/6/201 I GRAINGER 29.75
AP - 00308652 4/6/2011 GRANICUS INC 1,100.00
AP - 00308653 4/6/2011 GURROLA, IRENE 60.00
AP - 00308654 4/6/201 I HANSHAW, DIANE 7497
AP - 00308655 4/6/2011 HARBOUR, CAROL 964.00
AP - 00308656 4/6/2011 HERNANDEZ, CARLOS 90.00
AP - 00308657 4/6/201 t HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 830.97
AP - 00308657 4/6/2011 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 93.25
AP - 00308658 4/6/2011 HOME DEPOT CREDTT SERVICES 10.78
AP~- 00308659 4/6!2011 HSU, STEVE 7.20
AP - 00308660 4/6/2011 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALI 298.00
AP - 00308661 4/6/2011 I A A P 128.00
AP - 00308662 4/6/201 ] [ A A P 25.00
AP - 00308662 4/6/2011 I A A P 25.00
AP=00308662 4/6/2011 _- . ,_
I A A P -. Z~.00 ___
__
---
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez _
Page: 16 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report: CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRA( T_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP -00308662 4/6/2011 [ A A P 25.00
AP -00308662 4/6/2011 1 A A P 25.00
AP - 00308663 4/6/201 I IMPRESSIONS GOURMET CATERING 8,847.90
AP - 00308664 4/6/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 60.77
AP - 00308664 4/6/2011 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 76.16
AP - 00308665 4/6/2011 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 359.50
AP - 00308665 4/6/2011 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 52.50
AP - 00308666 4/6/2011 INNOCENZI JR D.O INC, ROBERT A ],165.00
AP - 00308667 4/6/201 t INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 75.00
AP - 00308668 4/6/2011 INTERNET INC 4,745.25
AP - 00308669 4!6/2011 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,739.R8
AP - 00308670 4!6/2011 JDC INC 60,471.00
AP - 00308671 4/6/2011 JOHNSON MACHINERY COMPANY 247.34
AP - 00308672 4!6/2011 JOHNSON, CHAD 75.00
AP - 00308673 4/6/201 I JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 580.00
AP - 00308673 4!6/201 I JONES AND MAYEK, LAW OFFICES OF 3,519.14
AP - 00308673 4/6/201 I JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,102.00
AP - 00308675 4/6/2011 KONE INC S 14.75
AP - 00308676 4/6/2011 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 4,770.00
AP - 00308677 4/6/2011 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 2,700.00
AP - 00308678 4/6120] 1 KUBZANSKY, JESSICA 1,066.00
AP - 00308679 4/6/2011 LA VERNE HERITAGE FOUNDATION 331.00
AP - 00308680 4/6/2011 LAMOUREUX, DAVID 2,000,00
AP - 00308681 4/6/201 l CARSON, KIRK 7270
AP - 00308682 4/6/2011 LI, 110NG 800.00
AP - 00308683 4/61201 I LIEBBR"C CASSIDY WHITMORE 1,377.00
AP - 00308684 4/6/2011 LIFE OF THE PARTY 350.00
AP - 00308684 4/6/201 l LIFE OF THE PARTY 605.00
AP - 00308686 4/6/2011 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER ! 35.54
AP - 00308687 4/6/201 1 LOUIS AND COMPANY 229.72
AP - 00308688 4/6/2011 LUPIAN, ARMANDO 84.67
AP - 00308689 4/6/2011 MANNING ELECTRIC INC 1,167.73
AP - 00308690 4/6/2011 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 21,536.86
AP - 00308690 4/6/201 1 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57
AP - 00308690 4/6/201 t MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,068.56
AP - 00308691 4/6/201 I MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 117.28
AP - 00308693 4/6/2011 MARTIN, NINA 44.00
AP - 00308694 4/6/201 I MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00308694 4/6/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00308694 4/6/2011 MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00
AP - 00308695 4/6/201 I MC TRUCKING 884.95
AP - 00308696 4/6/201 1 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 74.1 1
AP - 00308696 4/6/2011 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 39.22
AP-00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 47.99
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 8872
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 90.32
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDW ES"C TAPE 19.99
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 7798
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 182.71
AP - 00308697 4/6/201 I MIDWEST TAPE 19.99
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 256.20
AP - 00308697 4/6!2011 MIDWEST TAPE 145.30
AP - 00308697 4/6!2011 MIDWEST TAPE 9L97
AP - 00308697 4/6/201 I MIDWEST TAPE 154.96
P-97
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 17 Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_POR'CRAIT_RC - CK: Agcnda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:>3:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-98
A¢enda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 25.99
AP - 00308697 4/6/20] 1 MIDWEST TAPE 269.09
AP - 00308697 4/6/2011 MIDWEST TAPE 190.93
AP - 00308697 4/6/201 t MIDWEST TAPE 19.99
AP - 00308698 4/6/2011 MORENO, CRISTON 75.00
AP - 00308699 4/6/2011 MOUtv'TAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 32.60
AP - 00308699 4/6/201 I MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 47.63
AP - 00308700 4/6/2011 MT SAC TELEVISION PRODUCTION 548.75
AP - 00308701 4/6/2011 MUNIVE, REYNALDO
~ 75.00
AP - 00308702 4/6/2011 MURADIAN, LESLIE
~ 400.00
AP-00308703 4/6/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 183.17
AP - 00308703 4/6/2011 MW[ VETERINARY SUPPLY 872.91
AP - 00308703 4/6/201 I MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 429.62
AP - 00308703 4/6/201 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 168.94
AP - 00308703 4/6/201( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 851.39
AP - 00308703 4/6/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 14.51
AP - 00308703 4/6/201 l MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY ~ 500.92
AP -00308703 4/6/2011 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 678.35
AP - 00308704 4/6/201 I NAPA AUTO PARTS 52.17
AP - 00308704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 392.81
AP - 00308704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.05
AP - 0030$704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 32.21
AP - 00308704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 51.21
AP - 00308704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS 103.98
AP - 00308704 4/6/2011 NAPA AUTO PARTS ~ 25.33
AP - 00308704 4/6/201 I NAPA AUTO PARTS 24.66
AP - 00308704 4/6/201 I NAPA AUTO PARTS 49.63
AP - 00308705 4/6/2011 NATIONAL ASSOC OF TOWN WATCH 25.00
AP - 00308706 4/6/201 I NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 231.75
AP - 00308707 4/6/2011 NIMAKQ, SOLOMON 45.90
AP - 00308707 4/6/2011 NIMAKO, SOLOMON 57.45
AP - 00308708 4/6/2011 NOVARTIS ADIIMAL HEALTH US INC 337.80
AP - 00308709 416/201 l NUSS, JOHN 85.90
AP - 00308710 4/6/201 I NWOSU, LORETHA 32.64
AP - 00308711 4/6!201 t OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 237.33
AP - 0030871 l 4/6/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFC 68.62
AP - 0030871 l 4/6/201 I OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 56.93
AP - 0030871 I 4/6/2011 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF CALIFO 530.14
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 130.73
A P - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 62.60
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -186.94
AP - 00308713 4/6!201 l OFFICE DEPOT 7.46
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -186.94
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 5 L08
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFTICE DEPOT 310.57
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 539.02
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 43.13
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPO? 284.38
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICF-DEPOT 44.08
AP - 00308713 4/61201 I OFFICE DEPOT 129.65
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 5.89
AP - 00308713 4/61201 ! OFFICE DEPOT 29.47
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 67.49
AP - 0030$713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT _ 396.36
User: VLOPEZ-Veroni ca Lopez Page: 18 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-99
Agenda Check Register
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check N'o. Check llate Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 21.23
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 5.02
AP • 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 184.18
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 82,54
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 458.09
AP - 00308713 4!6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 82.18
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT tSS.9S
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 4.SS
AP - 00308713 4!6/201 I OFFICE DEP01' 1,248.84
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 829.19
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 127.62
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 1 OFFICE DEPOT 20.16
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 1 OFFICE DEPOT 13.51
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 49.04
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 17.17
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 22.08
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 90.34
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT 100.35
AP - 003087!3 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 30.42
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT ] 9.79
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 19.51
AP - 00308713 4!6/2011 OFFICE DEP07' 10.95
AP - 00308713 4!6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 186.94
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 345.66
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 I OFFICE DEPOT -7.96
AP - 00308713 4!6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT 55.29
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT -10.95
AP - 00308713 4/6/201 ] OFFICE DEPOT 73.23
AP - 00308713 4/6/2011 OFFICE DEPOT ! 25.08
AP - 00308714 4!6/201 I ONTRAC ] 5.48
AP - 00308714 4/6/2011 ONTRAC 54.96
AP - 00308715 4/6/2011 OPEN APPS INC 4,088.65
AP - 0030871 S 4/6/2011 OPEN APPS INC 2,294.63
AP - 00308716 4/6/2011 ORANGE EMPIRE CHAPTER ICC 70.00
AP - 00308717 4/6/2011 PAL CAMPAIGN 50.00
AP - 00308718 4/6/2011 PATCHETT & ASSOCIATES 647.50
AP - 00308719. 4/6/201 I PAUL GUGLIELMO PHOTOGRAPHY 3,656.20
AP - 00308720 4/6/201 I PEPES TOWING SERVICE 55.00
AP - 00308721 4/6!2011 PEPSI-COLA 1,300.97
AP - 00308722 4/6!201 I PEREZ, DOMINICK 1,600.00
AP - 00308723 4/6120 ] 1 FETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,469.75
AP - 00308724 4/6/201 I PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 84.00
AP - 00308725 4/6/201 I PORAC 160.00
AP - 00308726 4/6/2011 PORTER, BOB 1,825.00
AP - 00308727 4/6/201 I PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 168.48
AP - 00308727 4/6/20] I PR&PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40
AP - 00308728 4/6/2011 PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING 2,412,81
AP - 00308729 4/6/20! 1 PRO SPRAY EQUIPMENT 3,993.76
AP - 00308730 4/6/201 I RAINBOW CUSTOM CARS INC 4,893.75
AP - 00308731 4/6/2011 RANDOM HOUSE INC 6.53
AP - 00308731 4/6/2011 RANDOM HOUSE IN'C 46.98
AP - 00308731 4/6/201 I RANDOM HOUSE INC 27.02
AP - 00308731 4/6/2011 RANDOM HOUSE INC 79.22
AP - 00308733 4/6/201 I EY SERVICE
RBM LOCK AND K _ _ 2.99 _
User: VLOPEZ -Veroni ca LopezT _
Page: 19 Current Date: 0411 3 /2 0 1
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAII '_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: IS:S3:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-100
Asenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/201 I
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308733 4/6/2011 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 7.61
AP - 00308734 4/6/2011 RCPFA 9,305.31
AP - 00308735 4/6/2011 REED, GARY LEE 125.00
AP - 00308736 4/6/2011 REHABWES"P INC 378.76
AP - 00308737 4/6/2011 RICE, DANNY 75.00
AP - 00308738 4/6/201 I RIDGELBQE KOOFING 5,500.00
AP - 00308739 4/6/20( l ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00
AP - 00308739 4/6/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 195.00
AP - 00308739 4/6/2011 ROBLES, RAUL P 165.00
AP - 00308740 4(6/2011 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 402.00
AP - 00308744 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 174.00
AP - 00308744 4/6/201 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 148.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 267.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 267.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 528.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARD(NO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 387.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/201 I SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR< 1,300.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 267.00
AP - 00308745 4/6/2011 SAN BEfLNARDINO COUNTY AUDITOR CONTR( 356.00
AP - 00308746 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COU-NTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,695.96
AP - 00308747 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 20].90
.4P - 00308748 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INFORMATION SV 9,486.00
AP - 00308749 4/6/20] 1 SAN BERNARDINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSL-S° 840.00
AP - 00308750 4/6/2011 SAN BERNARDINO, CITY OF' 957.22
AP - 00308751 416/201 I SANS INSTITUTE 3,995.00
AP - 00308752 4/6/2011 SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 596.20
AP - 00308753 4/6/2011 SAUNDERS, REBECCA L 125.00
AP - 00308754 4/6/2011 SBC TAX COLLECTOR 1,543.91
AP - 00308755 4/6/2011 SBC TAX COLLECTOR !,65].14
AP - 00308756 4/6/2011 SBC TAX COLLECTOR 803.38
AP - 00308757 4/6/201 I SBC TAX COLLECTOR 1,336.91
AP - 00308758 4/6/20 t 1 SBC TAX COLLECTOR 1,693.20
AP - 00308759 4/6/2011 SBC TAX COLLECTOR 1,996.29
AP - 00308760 4/6/2011 SBPEA 710.71
AP - 00308761 4/6/2011 SCALISE, ANTHONY 75.00
AP - 00308762 4/6/2011 SHEAKLEY 172.00
AP - 00308762 4/6/2011 SHEAKLEY 8.75
AP - 00308762 4/6/201 ] SHEAKLEY 12.00
AP - 00308762 4/6/201 I SHEAKLEY 4.00
AP - 00308762 4/6/2011 SHEAKLEY 86.00
AP - 00308762 4/6/2011 SHEAKLEY 37.50
AP - 00308762 4/6!2011 SHEAKLEY 10.00
AP - 00308763 4/6/20] 1 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 194.11
AP - 00308764 4/6/2011 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 150.00
AP - 00308765 4/6/2011 SHOETERIA 132.12
AP - 00308765 4/6/2011 SHOETL-RIA 97.86
AP - 00308766 4/6!2011 SHRED IT 39.84
AP - 00308766 4/6/2011 SHRED IT 19.92
AP - 00308766 4/6/2011 SHRED IT 19.92
AP - 00308766 4/6/20( 1 SIiRED IT 19.92
AP - 00308767 4/6/201 ] SIGMANET 1,007.19
AP - 00308768 4/6/201 I SIGN SHOP, THE 152.00
AP - 00308768 4/6/2011 SIGN SHOP, THE 8].56
AP - 00308770 4/6/2011 SMITH, CINDY 350.00
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 20 Current Dale: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_R EG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-101
Agenda Check Register
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Dale Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308771 4/6/20! I SMITH, JAYMI LEE 781.00
AP - 00308772 4/6/20 L 1 SM[TS VAN OYEN, JULIE 15.00
AP - 00308772 4/6/2011 SMITS VAN OYEN, JULIE 70.00
AP - 00308773 4/6/2011 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 354.50
AP - 00308774 4/6/20! 1 SOURCE GRAPHICS 156.36
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.70
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.56
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 551.04
AP - 00308779 4!6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.12
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORT~IIA EDISON 66.22
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.21
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 L SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.40
.4P - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.19
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 89.23
AP - 00308779 4/6/20(1 SOUTHERN CAL[FORN7A EDISON 212.45
AP - 00308779 4/6/20! 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 143.11
AP - 00308779 4/6/20 L 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EllISON 54.54
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.31
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.24
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.65
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 34.67
AP - 00308779 4!6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308779 4!6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.20
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2 L07
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.65
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2 L80
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80
AP - 00308779 4/6/20(1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 117.16
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 49.43
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.30
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 121.32
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED[SON 22.34
AP - 00308779 4/6/20! I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.24
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.45
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.35
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22,49
AP - 00308779 4/6/20! l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDJSON 93.12
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON ] 19.97
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIF'ORMA ED(SON 24.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 26.65
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.29
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 43.50
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.39
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDiSON 69.76
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 402.35
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.72
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.18
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 21 Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
12eport: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-102
Agenda Check Resister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. ~ Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.40
AP - 00308779 4!612011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.01
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.61
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 146.57
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.84
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.06
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHL-RN CALIFORNIA EDISON - 38.65
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.60
AP - 003087 79 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 74.39
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.45
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.01
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.02
AI' - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.89
AP - 00303779 4/6!2011 SOUTI-TERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3.10
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.43
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11.98
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.28
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.13
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 199.36
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.84
AP - 00308779 4/61201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/20! 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.97
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.38
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2224
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 69.06
AP - 00308779 4/6!2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.EDISON 82.57
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.81
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58,49
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 214.37
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.10
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 289.33
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 235.89
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.04
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 16.75
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.18
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.81
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDTSON 67.54
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.70
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.65
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 22 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-103
Agenda Check Re2isYer
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date V_e_ndor Name Amount
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.80
AP - 00308779 4/6/20 ] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2424
AP - 00308779 4!6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 L SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.42
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.06
AP - 00308779 416/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.44
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.44
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.91
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.12
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.95
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.77
AP - 00308719 4!6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 138.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.89
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.42
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 ! SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.04
AP - 00308779 4/6/2071 SOUTHERN CALffORNIA EDISON 25.27
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.10
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145. ] I
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2234
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.66
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.51
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.72
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.30
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.84
AP - 00308779 416/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 51.52
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/20] 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORMA EDISON 24.19
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.78
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.49
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNL4 ED[SON 23.98
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 197.03
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.43
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 212.83
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.42
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 ] SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA L-DISON 24.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.17
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.95
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 91.40
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.53
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.62
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.80
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2131
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.44
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.61
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 23
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-704
Aeenda Check Ret_ister
3/30!2011 through 4/12/2011
Check Na. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 684.57
AP - 00308779 4/6/201 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ED150N 438.58
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.57
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.19
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.09
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.77
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 30.95
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.85
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.29
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOU"fHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON ~ 174.69
AP - 00308779 4/6/2011 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 20.38
AP - 00308780 4/6/20] 1 SOUTHLAND OPERA 700.00
AP - 00308781 4/6/2011 SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS 598.00
AP - 00308782 4/6/2011 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 457.48
AP - 00308783 4/6/201 l STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 404.05
AP - 00308783 4/6/20(1 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 115.05
AP - 00308783 4/6/2011 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 179.77
AP - 00308783 416/201 I STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 270.25
AP - 00308783 4/6/2011 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 81.70
AP - 00308783 4/6/2011 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 122.40
AP - 00308783 4/6!2011 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 195.94
AP - 00308784 4/6/2011 STOFA, JOSEPH 11.00
AP - 00308786 4/6/20! 1 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 404.82
AP - 00308787 4/6/2011 THORNTON, SHAWNYA 85.00
AP - 00308788 4/6/2011 TOMARK SPORTS INC 583.90
AP - 00308789 4/6/2011 TOOMOTH, DR MICHELE PERSON 1,349.75
AP - 00308790 4/6/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 150.95
AP - 00308790 4/6/2011 U 5 LEGAL SUPPORT WC 60.00
AP - 00308790 4/6/201 I U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 121.69
AP - 00308790 4/6/201 I U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 59.19
AP - 00308790 4/6/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 129.75
AP - 00308990 4/6/2011 U S LEGAL SUPPORT' INC 118.24
AP - 00308791 4/6/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 25.85
AP - 00308791 4/6/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 723.95
AP - 00308791 4/6/2011 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 167.05
AP - 00308791 4/6/2011 UIVIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE ~ 46.20
AP - 00308792 4/6/2011 UNITED PACIFIC SERVTCES INC 5,070.00
AP - 00308792 4/6/2011 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 11,794.00
AP - 00308793 4/6/2011 UNITED ROTARY HRUSH CORPORATION 522.54
AP - 00308794 4/6/2011 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 142.96
AP - 00308794 4/6/2011 UNITED SITE^ SERVICES OF CA INC 218.30
AP - 00308795 4/6/2011 UNITED WAY 235.50
AP - 00308795 4/6/20] 1 UNITED WAY 11.00
AP - 00308796 4!6/2011 UPS 47.74
AP - 00308797 4/6/2011 US IDENTIFICATION MANUAL 90.13
AP - 00308798 4/6/201 I US POSTMASTER 9,000.00
AP - 00308799 4/6/201 I UTILIQUEST 761.75
AP - 00308800 4/6/20 t 1 VEND U COMPANY 131.16
AP-00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 84.78
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 673.14
AP-00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 77.10
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.06
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 24
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:534
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-105
Agenda Check Register
3/30/2011 though 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 i VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 416'/201 I VERIZON 76.95
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 364.74
AP - 00308803 4/6/20( l VERIZON 584.78
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 207.47
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 55.88
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38. ] 8
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38.52
AP-00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 111.04
AP - 00308803 4/6!201 ] VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 20.16
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 i VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308803 4/6120(1 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERiZON 37.01
AP - 00308803 4/6(2011 VERIZON 148.91
AP - 00308803 4!6/201 ] VERIZON 144.63
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 40.20
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 186.05
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VEKIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 t VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 94.92
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 18.57
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 242.04
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 35.69
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 l VERIZON ~ 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 I VERIZON 18.06
AP - 00308803 4/6/201 1 VERIZON 43.60
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 V ERIZON 76.37
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 38.18
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 1,511.33
AP - 00308803 4/6/2011 VERIZON 210.52
AP - 00308804 4/6/2011 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA ]0,285.00
AP - 00308805 4/6/2011 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 1,327.00
AP - 00308806 4/6/2011 VOSS, MARY 45.00
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 47.20
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 35.65
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 44.34
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 68.07
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 46.78
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 86.08
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 63.05
AP - 00308807 4/6/2011 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 16.67
AP - 00308508 4/6/201
1 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,452.53
_
__
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 25 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_ R EG_PORTRAIT _RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-106
A¢enda Check ReEister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 49.66
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 34.95
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 136.26
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,075.82
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SAMTARY SUPPLY 52.58
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,519.53
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 271:24
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 272.19
AP - 00308808 4/6/2011 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 457.74
AP - 00308809 4/6/2011 WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 122.24
AP - 00308810 4/6/2011 1UEST END h4ATERIAL SUPPLY 6.81
AP - 00308810 4/6/2011 WEST END MATEKIAL SUPPLY 10].89
AP - 0030881 I 4/6/201 I WEST PAYMENT CENTER 321.00
AP - 00308812 4/6/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00
AP - 00308812 4/6/201 I WESTERN UNNERSITY 35.00
AP - 00308312 4/6/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 43.00
AP-00308812 4/6/2011 WESTERNUMVERSITY 35.00
AP-00308812 4/6/2011 WESTERN UNIVERSITY 35.00
AP - 00308812 4/6/201 I WL-STERN UNIVERSITY 43.00
AP - 00308812 4/6/2011 WE51'ERN UNIVEKSITY 43.00
AP - 00308813 4/6/201 I WILDLIFE COMPANY, THE 395.00
AP - 00308814 4/6/201 I WILSON AND BELL 338.74
AP - 00308816 4/6/2011 ZIIMAR INDUSTRIES INC 91.35
AP - 00308817 4/7/201 I AIRGAS WEST 112.37
AP - 00308818 4/7/201 ] AUTO BODY 2000 1,674.97
AP - 00308818 4/7/2011 AUTO BODY 2000 662.25
AP - 00308818 4/7/201 I AUTO BODY 2000 46.00
AP - 00308820 4/7/201 I BRODART BOOKS 31.03
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 135.34
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308820 4/7%2011 BRODART BOOKS 279.26
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 54.95
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 53.82
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART ROOKS 9.02
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.5 t
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 153.41
AP - 00308820 4!7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308820 4!7/20 L 1 BRODART BOOKS 6.69
AP - 00308820 ~ 4!7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 51.64
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 9.02
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART' BOOKS 13.53
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 33.60
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 93.96
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 362.90
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 26.23
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 7.34
AP - 00308820 4/7/20] 1 BRODART BOOKS 26.23
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 24.34
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 165.64
User: VLOPEZ -Veronica Lopez Page: 26 Current Date: 04/13/201
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-107
Agenda Check ReP,ister
3/30/2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check llate Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 27.70
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 24.43
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 226.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 17.57
AP - 00308820 4/7/201 I BRODART BOOKS 25-40
AP • 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 33.69
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 102.15
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 16.93
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 4.51
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 58.48
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 7.34
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 26.91
AP - 00308820 4/7/2011 BRODART BOOKS 42.47
AP - 00308821 4/7/2011 CALSENSE (,581.37
AP - 00308821 4/7/2011 CALSENSE 1,908.94
AP - 00308822 4/7/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308822 4!71201 I COMP U ZONE 261.00
AP - 00308822 4/7/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308822 4/7/2011 COMP U ZONE 1,253.89
AP - 00308822 4/7/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308822 4/7/2011 COMP U ZONE 85.00
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY 1NATER DISTRICT 156.52
AP-00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTRIC'f 79.63
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.14
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.36
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.08
AP - 00308823 - 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.80
AP - 00308823 4/7/20 ] 1 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 128.44
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VAL[_EY WATER DISTRICT 186.87
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 381.54
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 677.02
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCA,bIONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 293.43
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.93
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 162.41
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CIJCAMONGA VALLEY WATER UISTRIC"1' 310.36
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRIC"f 270.34
AP • 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,449.95
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 150.18
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 70.66
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 151.54
AP - 00308823 x/7/201 ] CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (28.82
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 89.14
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.36
AP - 00308823 4/7/201 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 51.55
AP - 00308823 4/7/2011 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 864.57
AP-00308823 4/7/20]1 CUCAMONGAVALLEYWATERDISTR[Cf It0.89
AP - 00308824 4/7/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 177.20
AP - 00308824 4/7/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 640.36
AP - 00308824 4/7/2011 DAPPER TIRE CO 2,646.87
AP - 00308825 4!7/2011 EMCOR SERVICE 11,305.50
AP - 00308826 4/7/2011 EWING IltRIGATION PRODUCTS 729.09
AP - 00308826 4/7/201 I EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 30.60
AP - 00308827 4/7/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 493.26
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 27
Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_POR'fRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout
Current Date: 04/13/201
Time: 15:53:4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P-108
Agenda Check Register
3/30!2011 through 4/12/2011
Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount
AP - 00308827 4/7/201 ] GENERATOR SERVICES CO 543 .87
AP - 00308827 4/7/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 493 .26
AP~- 00308827 4/7/2011 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,877. 40
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50 .00
AP - 00308828 417!2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 448 .81
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 152 .53
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC SD. 00
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 446 .10
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 62. 08
AP - 00308828 4/7/201 ] HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 868 .89
AP - 00308828 4/7/2011 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 50 .00
AP - 00308829 4/7/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 122 .14
AP - 00308829 4/7/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 411 .10
AP - 00308829 4/7/201 I HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 187 .74
AP - 00308830 4/7/2011 HYDROSCAPE PRODUCTS INC 45 .10
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,091 .40
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 446. 00
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 798. 80
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,046. 60
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 439. 00
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAII-Y BULLETIN S4S. 70
AP - 00308831 4/7/20] 1 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 381. 60
AP - 00308831 4/7/201 ] INI-AND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 832. 40
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 374. 60
AP - 00308831 4/7/201 t INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 534. 20
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 313. 00
AP • 00308831 4/7/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN S 18. 80
AY - 00308831 4/7/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 476. 80
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ~ 321. 40
AP - 00308831 4/7/2011 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 940. 20
AP - 00308831 4/7/201 I INLAND VALLEY llAB.Y BULLETIN 971. 00
AP - 00308831 4/7/201 I INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN S4S. 40
AP - 00308832 4/7/201 ] INTERSTATE BATTERIES 82. 60
AP - 00308833 4/7/2011 IRONMAN PARTS AND SERVICES 400. 00
AP - 00308833 4/7/2011 IRONMAN PARTS AND SERVICES 400. 00
AP - 00308833 4/7/201 I [RONMAN PARTS AND SERVICES 400. 00
AP - 00308834 4/7!2011 KLAUS AND SONS 3,260. 00
AP - 00308834 4/7/2011 KLAUS AND SONS 790. 00
Total for Check ID AP: 1,798,106. 44
EP - 00001726 3/30/2011 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,156,495. 00
EP - 00001727 4/6/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 1,100. 00
EP - OOOOU27 4/6/2011 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMC 7,080. 00
EP - 00001728 4/6/2011 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,155. 84
Total for Check !D EP: 2,165,830.84
Total for Entity: 3,963,937.28
User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 28 Curren[ Date: 04/13/201
Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:53:4
rn
E
U
u
U
~ C
r
~ m E o
V`°E"'
C ~
O R V7 M
L ~ O
c O G v
~o~`°
w~ o~
0 o a
~, a
U
r~ ~°~~ YS
i' s atx rs ~ -j
x, c
°+.''_-',:tea ~,.~
> p N
N b H H
~ m
vi m o a
of N
m
W o ~ N ~ 4
b
n
g
> $ g n° m m m ~ m
r
f ~ b N 0 ~ ~
O
»> 1S O r (V ~
~ r O
w~' f N N n N b
p C N O N O ~
QTW ~
f
€If ~ co'+ m I'
T O 1~ 10 r
In
m
e
O~ ~ O 1~ ~ n p
yp o n .- ri e C
~ ~ ^ o
d
N N
O M
p j I
O m G n ~
O p Y] b
b ~ O ~
m > < b
W i. d
O N
V .
~
~ N
~ 1`
N 0 N
N m m 1p
O N
N
A ~ f0 V h fO 1
N
' N
0
m'
0 j
b~
N
N
d
7
^ .
} '
p l
l O
Np~
^
m~
m 1
p
m ,
~
>
W N
n
a n m n
o ~ ~i ~ ~'
~
,
N
N
W ~
p
e O n N ~ LLi
N fO
-
N ..
.- 1~ m Ol
N !
N N
~~ N O O O O m ~' m
~- 0 0 N of N G
0
S
> <S88 ~ `" m
°'
~
o °
°
~~
~ i
~ w
i v
i
n
o ~ ~
' 1
N^ n VI A fD h
W
'
~ G
p
v
i I
m
f
Fc
a
d
C
N S[
m zi c
LL ~ U g
v ~xx ~ ~
v S ~ ~
~o~.go
asa~'g v
ro qNq Q qq G
Q U N~ G L
N
2 `m ~ '~ ~
~~E~~
- Yj
0
~ m
c
~v a
~_ m
L
~~ m
~~ V
m '~ -0 0
U a5 t-
:°.
f
b
c
_
v E
~
" m o
E~
m a
m E v
`-~ c c
n°
' m
°
'
-
o
~E S
o
c
o r
o. F
r
C
N ~ ~
O
m ' O
> 9 N
C y j
~ O
n
5
O N L
d m ~
U N U
Q d _
O
N a
O L C
C
~ E E
~p % N
y b
I
1 C
'ou
m
G N
V
O
N
~ f+ O
n ~+ -T-
o U
S
T
D r
`
~~ a
c
e ~
d N
N O C V
y-
oe ri E ; o
N a~ o
N C
y D.
d ry
N U b
N N
-' ~
~~
m
3 ~ m
T ~
b r
C
m
m E
w~
U O
n \
~a
~ y ~
b
~ ~
O
t z ~
C
m
N m
e C
rh d OI
C b
m
a
m C
t
`
~ C
E
.
- rn
m inEa
u
i m m c ~
~ °
m ~ o ~ x
rv
v ~ o.
g LL
e
°o c 5
o~tJ 3
b
= m
U d`a
O
c m
E
~
.~ v
~ ~
m m
c Ea
~' c~ c~
T m _
m E ^ m
z w
C~
~ wy
rynry c
~ U L
41 ~
y OO
N ~ O
°1
c
m
o~ N
~ $
m 2 c E
m
~ E
T
m 'cb'm~ V)m
" ~ '
" i
m o y
~ yy ~ =
C N i~ +
ZCb L'.C ~~
a
y
m
y ~E ~ R
a~ i
U Q W ~Q L
rn
i 1
-
P-109
U U n
a f >
e rc~
a a ¢
a E
a
N
n
e~
4
r
0
of n
crn
G O
d
C z'
W
a
~c
O C C
E °' •.
N
r
d
7 ~ C N
U = -
O ~ m M
t
U
~ O d ~
~ •~ ~ ~
w O
~• a° ~
v a°
W
O
f
~~i
O ~'
m~
~ g el
OI O.
I
~ 1
~~
f
9~i o
N
N N
71 Q
y N O
O
m ~ m
N
~~ N [m'1~
~ ~ [O
pY y<
N I N N
N N
~. n
m
~' a ~
q ', N N
a ~ ~
N N
~~' I
a
i
PSI x'
w ^
Q m m
m
~ n
Z
LL
N
2
Y
U m
2 T
W
m
1 Q
laJ m
O _
9
Y
s
~ ~
i! a N `WY
LL ~
7 '.. ~ S Z
_C C S
a
c iO
u ~
C
y ~ ° C
N O
V J N V
P-110
r ~- M W N N'' l"1 m m VI P' ~ H N OI m N P N' Cl Y1 b P
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
!
O O
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O~ m 0~ N N ~`1 (V ``I N N LV £1 `~~ N N N ~ n N N m ~`l
N m P F U n
U
P m O jPV
pOp (V Yl r~~ ~ d P (OV
N
N
~
~
' ~
~ °a ~ a a O i
~ p
}
r
r ~ p
1 m
D Vj
~-
l 1
f~ C~ o C~ ~ Via a g
S ~ (
O O
O O ~ O O O ~ O
O O
O
O
O O
O O
O O p
p LL
, y
p
~Cp1
y ~m
p
S
p
0
b
W
m
N
P
~
~ a h
of N Q N
m O.
m M m m off ^
C
I
f7 t7
n~ 0 d Y n n
. '/!
r ~
S O 1y
~p p
N O S fO N S n A N N n p° VI n N N N N N ~[°1 N p O S O ° m N
O
m m O m n m Jl m N r N N l0 O f0 VI ~ N m N O N O W P
r N N N N N l"1 ~ ~ (J N ~ ~ ~ 1h m ~ N N N ~ ~ ~ lV O! (V N ~ ~
d N N ( Np Wy A N N q 0q f@@i N t0 1q9 ryN 1~Q$ qN q A q N W R N N N W N No 1q0
¢ a ¢ ¢ ¢ `
¢
a
N
'
m
`
6
Q
Q 6
Q
Q Q
a
a
4 Q 4
¢
a ¢ a
Q
Q a
a ~
p
Vo
Vo
p pN
pry
1
1
p
8
8
8
N
O
O O N
S n ~D m, N m N f~ b ~ O O 0 N b N 1~ N O N O W P
O m f0 ~ mm
r N CI N N N CI r N N [V 17 r IV ~ N ~ ~' ~ (V W N N
°0 0 0 °o, o° °o °° °o
W-. ~ °a. S g o °o 0 0
°O
°o
°o
°o g ~ ~ g g g
°o,
°o
m
S 8
O pp
(p
~
p
8
y
8
8
O O O O S S
n S S S N
S S O O N Ol ~ S~ N
O N OI W O O O O
YI N~ q
p
O
O S 0 n S S O m p pmj O
O
S
N
Q
N d~ O O O.
O S m O
W
O O O P~ N
m O
W O
S m d W O O
I
N
N
0 ty (7 ~ P d ~ N N ~ M P ~' N N P' CI ~- m O f V N N 17
~[1
Y~ W
N O O O O O O O O S C O~ O O, O O S S S O O N O O S S O
O O
O
O
O O O O O O
N aN
pm
m
~ W r W N fm0 ImO T S m m
m
O
N
O
m
M I
r O P n m
W m
's
Y P W
t
1` S~~ 1~ 0 M N C
0
m O
O O p
m p
m m m Oi m~ ~ ADD W S N N m Wm O'~ l~l S O n O T N g O O m 0
m m O ~ m O O H O O O O O~ m W O O O m O W W d O O m W
_ _ d P m N P P N N N N '- ~' ~ m l7 N N N CI Cl N ~ CI P N N ~ N
° of °o g ~ S S °m S °° °o °o °o °o S g S °o °o °o °o °0 0 0 °o o° °°
S °
°
o
8 S
e °
W
8 8 8 8 S o 0 0 8 8 S o 8 o g o 0 0 0 o S S o g$ 0 8 8
0 0 0
o 0 0
0
0
n
W
m Q
QQ
Q
Q Q
o b a$$ g S g g g °o_ o o ~°n_ ~°n_ o$ °o °o °p
~ 0 0 0 °
$ S~ 25 3 o S °o
,
Y Y t7 tV O P (V N N N N (V N h Ol h N N N P 17 ~ N P N N N M
m n~ W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .- m m W o 0 o m o .- ~ o 0 0 0 0
`
° °
°
S
Y 0 0 0 0
0 0 o a o 0 0 0
Q
°° o °° °o (0V 0 p 0 0 o r r o
~ N N ~ C O N N (V ~ L`I i`! ~ ~`! ~ N N `V
N
O
m P
O
~
T
im
~
h
~
N C
,~
V
(
V Y
1ti
(
YZ ' O~ Q (
~`O1 W m_ O Q N C
h
N O
~YS ~ CAS ~ fZ' ~ N 1a ~ ~ 0 t' ~ ~ [~ [~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ a C P b fa o ~
0 0 0 0 p
P
p O p p p O ~ 0 0 0
p C G O
°e aaa a as
,
e K K K K K K
~ O O O 0 0 0
vi U U V U U U
~ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (7 (7 C7 (l (7 O
g ~ Z 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z 2 2 2 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ~' ~~~~ ~'
Z Q Q Q a¢¢ Q Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z S S~~ S Q
O O O O O
1
~
~~~
~
O m
¢
m
m m
m m G
~~ m m m~~ m m~~~ f~
t t t t t ~' t~ ~'t t t t
LL 0 0 0 O O 0 O ~ ~ O ~ O O 2 2 Z Z Z 2 2 2 a 2 2 2 2 2 Z
J W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q C Q Q Q Q Q Q G G
Q ¢¢ K~ K rc¢¢¢¢ a K K O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J
O ~ E~ E E E E~ E E~~~ E~ E~~ E F E P~ F~ E~~
K
y m
rn K K K K 5 C K K K
< G¢¢ Q Q<¢ «¢ Q Q O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 e LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S S S S S S S 2 2 S S 2 S 2 2
Q
m 7
a J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J
4
~
~ 4a 4a a4 4a
4
q
4
4
4
4
4 4
4 ~ ~
Q
4
g
g ~
g
q
4
4
q
~
~ a a
n
a
a
a
a
a
a a
a
a a
a
a
¢ a
c
a
a
a
a
a
w w W w w w w w w w W w w w w w w w w w W W w w w W W W
z e
W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m o 0 0 0
w w w w w w LL w w w LL LL LL LL w w w w w w LL LL LL w w w w w
~ q LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
O
S
N C
n
O
Ypf Imp mN pp
r
m
N
m
{~ o {
~ p
S O d C C P
C
y CJ Cnl (n+l M Y' O P P P P d d m ~'1 d P P C
N ~'
n
m
~
N
~
+ p I~ _
Q
S
N N lnq X U' Y
Z Z 6 Q P y~ F
m 7 ~
Q
a
2 LL Y~ m LL
V
5
C1 t
i
Y
R
~ W LL J F N V' O¢ O
¢¢ LL h}~ ~. ' O K C} GG O LL 2
j
~ j
~
O m W
~ O i Y O 41
~ X O ( S
1
M X X
SG
_
y XX n ~n X X(7 C9OyO
W F
m
M'
N N E
S S n
~ e
M
m
M
7 S
n n M n
M
M
S
M
~ -
O
u
i i
t
t
)
Cl
(
t
'
'
t
C
I I
']
f
J
m
7 ~
~
M
m
~
'+
LL n n n n n n m m nm m N m N N m m~ ~n n i i M N l ~
N
W
a
_~
C Cc~
O ~ Y
~ ~ N
V d j ~
7 ~ C ~
V (Q N
C
O ~ N irj
C=7 r L
V
~ ~ ~ g
c 0 0
V a a°
'C ~
~~
Qf
Z
w'
o~
E
Y3
9~
N
A"
`e`
n'
~'
0~
Q~
N pO_ b VI N O N b N P N
~V N ~V fA`l N° N N 1°V ° N
c ul e a ~ ~ ~ vi c ~
a~SooS1°~p??So G
vl N m b N Y~ O b m n ul
~~ b N O ` ^ °
O O O° N O
~ S m m
N S 0 O m O 1~ A O A
N N~ N W 10 N 10 A'
~8 a a a a a a ~~
° °o °o ° r ~ ~ ~i °o °m 0
m o m o m o n n, o n m
N fV N t7 t7 ~ ~ N ~
SS S 8O 8 O O S O S S S Y1 b
O S O O O O O S O O N I 0
OO O O O O O G O O O ~O 10
b N S_ S_ S_ S O S Om ON OOI Ob
N O N
°b So°p °08 ~y°op~ p°o °o ~°op ~~°opp ~ S n n
N 1~ O N 17 0 OI I~lpf N m~ lY'f pN~
m S O b O Y 0 0 0 0 O <
Y N b N t7 N O N N •' 1~
0 0 0 °o, °o, °o o °o, o °o ~ QQ$
SS o °oo o °oo g'o °m°o E
c d c o c c d o 0 0 o c
00 0 0 0 og °o °o°o °o
0 o N m m, S o
h N N O N M N lV
o ~ ~ ~ m m o o 0
CC' lb"Cg S~~ RrN
m Y t~ E' W W m O N {~'
~Soooso's?'s's
i a a a P+
¢ ¢ rc rc g
0 0 0 0 3
U U V U ~
h F f F n
OO O~z zzz z z "~
N N VI 41 N fq
~~~ N N N 41 N N
¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢
O O O O
W W W W
00 0oa Q~QQ~Qa~a <~<az m
aS QS QS ¢2 Q2 aT Q2 QZ Q2 QZ > P
K K K K K K K C K K N Q
w w w w w w w w w w~ g
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL~ W
C
O ~
n
0
O
U y~ ~p m
m N N N (~ O N 1+! Y h O
q~
IM
I T
VC
~ I
N b A m N M1 y b y
a N Y O t'~ p! > g$ $ W U> m
m U' pU' yV' IpJ LL a ri ri LL LL N
O ~j CJ V lh M m b m m m N
d
LL n n m m e~ i i in m r n m
O
'
N
N ~`!
m
a o
r ti m
p
Y
A r b N
m
G O N f~ T 4!
lV
m N
~ a ~
o c 0
g .o °o
r N (7
m m
S N
A
N P
a d
n n
r r
A
O O
b N
8.8
0 0
S 8
0 0
°0 0
N Yi
a
C
a
i
_i
o °o °o
d d o
S S S
o v e
n °o gi
(V N h
°°
~{~o~l
N N
8~
P
T
a
F
2 u
K
f7 Q
a
W a
a
h
c
S
U o
N
a
U
m
h
y m
NN m
G
r m
e
0
U ~
R V
~ N o
VI F N
~ O ~`
tt Z
w O
3 QQ>
U W
lKlu
V F m
QpZ
W H Q
z u a
7 Q A
K U E
a
N
a a
9
61
N Y
u ~
_ ~
g e .-
A
~i
a
b
h
rv
r
'mi
w
e
N
b
e
0
T
m
b
Q
g
S
F
P-111
H U ~
U
o E
o a
o a
a E
a
0
K
P-112
m yy
Y-U
rn
d U
o ~
E 2` o i
~ rc
q~
i 0
m 0
a a
°~ ~
S i
~°.~
c ~
w
m
yr
C
i
S
~ I
I
~ ~
~ 0
41
~ n e
7
i Q
N
m
'
Y =
g l
~ ~
m I ~
°t ~ .°n n
> °
r °m
Y
q ~
N
r T
n
N
Y =
~ C N
E d
Ev
,~
e
v m m
~ a
m ~
o
~
U ~ w N ~ ~ ~
Y -
O
M p N
~ m
V ~ = n
C G O ~
~' ~ ~ ~
' d a
~ mm
Y
.
+
U
mY O O
y q O
Qm o
Z
O
a
U
LL
U
b
! Y
m e m
W
Z m
u
U m
~
> m`
> a
`
Q m
t
N
a i~ U
m
E O
' ~
'
°
r
~ ' Q m
>
c N
:~
m
°a
~+
c
in
el
el
~ m $
a m
c o
~ ~~ y o
U ~ f q N ~
~~
a i I o
>
~
o i~
Y rc a.
o a rc
I a ~
~~
n
°e I i
m~
m
°n
°o ~
°0
0
9p ) T p A;
O~ O $ 0' A N d A
Wm y
N NI ~p
001 ~~ ~ ~
p
N N I n
N 0 d h
x w
$
$
o o °o
°c
~
a I
s
~e 'S 8 SSA ~ o s
.
d d N N C! O N N; A
Q.
4
G '
( r
r qq ryry~~
0Y O O O$ O O O O $
~ O O O O O O O
O ~ $ $
N ~o 0 o o
R $ ° ~ g
C7 d- a a 0 a
0 W
La (y
t
V
R
R ~ p_ 4
U
3 ~ (- L ! I
V c r I i
m
o com ~ ~
~~
~ ~ ~ '
V
'
C p'~
t+ ~
Lo o 0 o
~' ~ i
.
R •-« $ ~~
~ 0 0
Q O H o
w
O p N o o i
$ N
Q O N N N O
U r
m
~ ~
~ ~~ o m m~ ~ S 8 y
_
C
O
m ~'
~ p
O
G N
M T
I
i O
lY A
d 0 N
M
p~m
g
u1 m u~ vPi Y < i
m ~ ~n uni
_ d l Z N ~ n
Z n j Q Z Z e 1
LL ~ q ^ C
~ O
N M
a
>
~ j _ Q
Q
? ~
U { Z U
`
~w W ~ A
L
E w e 9 a
=
z 8 0 (~ i o b~ ~ F
', Q ~ ~ Q
a
¢ > > m > >
J
N
N K K K
W
H T
2
N
N
N
v o 0 0 ~ o
a r
C ~ LL Ia. LL O
=. J
f
W C ~
~ Q
a m ~
d O
U O
~ U Ol
N
c o ~ N Q °m
c C
C ~ , m ` a ~ U ~ $
t
~ m
$ '
w
m G
c ~ ~
i
> .
01 ~ D A N
~ ~_ T 'C 9 N
r O ® d N m
~ O1 N 0
N Q 0
w Z' ~ ° a E
Q
1
~ o
8 ~
L° ~ w
~ x
o m
a m
u
E ..
~
J ~ ~ M 1m'1 ~ ~ O p O
J V } N
U LL m m m d
F N N ~L V' ~
V J N I
P-114
v
Q
U ~
N
IL N
m y
O M
E 3 u
° m Gr
U ~ ~
m q a
L
C _ W
N .m L
~ C C
`o m o
L
_ m m
U U_
O p
LL
E
N
Of O N
e o m a
0 0 ~+i Q
N N N
1~
T
~~
U j Y
N N
w w
a o 0 0
)
m °
0 0 0
> d o 0
D ,
Q Q Q
g o i Z Z
N
t «I m m m
R
5 O v e <
d m m o>
m
a a a
J 3 J
LL LL LL
c
~ g g
aTi aTi m
N N
n m p
1 O p1 i[] N N N O O E
O O
of ro ~ of ~
n n c vi vi cc ai
m
U n n o ~ m m
~ m n v
i _ ~ N
~
~
'n i
p
O N ~ V V tD
~- N
In
O .
r N
~ w w w w w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s e a a e v o 0
° °
° °
° 0 0 0 °
°
°
0 0 0
0 0 0
o
o o
o
o o
o
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z
m rn m °o °
rn m m o N
",a„
n 'n ~ l3
0 0 0 0 0
rn rn rn vi m
a n a a n
O O O O O
J J J J J
N W N m W
rr~~f-
Q Q Q Q Q
N ~ N _N N
li. IL 11 lL IL
Q Q Q ¢ ¢ Q
Z Z 12 Z 2 2
N N N Im VI N
o° °o °o °o o °o
N N l\! ~V N (V
as a f~N GNj
a a a
~ J ~
LL LL LL
m m v
Y Y Y
~ g E
T T T
m m m
c ac c
J J J
LL LL LL
C~ ~
G
m m m
m
2 a c a> j c> > `c j
C ~ C j
J IL ~ U' c c
u' LL O~
%
U V' UO 2R5
%
O LL
LL
LL O LL {L
z 1
p
a U
¢a
F"Q ~
u ~ 2 E m m E Je ~
~ m m n
"
' m a n
'
6 2 m m ~ m m 3 v
~ L u~
v
m a
m m n a> N
J m m m m m 5
n m m
n
~ K K N (n K K K N= d N d
a d W ~ e e
m Q l~ IL IL IL
m
V C N N N _N
F a 3 3 3 3
Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z
1n Ill 1n In N In
°o °o °o ° °o °o
~V N N N L
t~l t~ M M [7
0 0 0 0 0 0
a a a a a a
c c c c c c
l1 lL tL Il IL ti
~ ~ ~ Y x ~
T T T T T T
C C C C G C
C
LL
a
c c ~
J
X~ C J U U
N LL J N Q Q
~ m u. ~
~ 2 FS o » n
u m m m'u
n w m o m c
N K a U d
LL
N
3
~
a
` r
U
m E
LL
(=II M C ~ C N (7
~ O y y m
a ~
= O
t
a
~ o
Z v m @c@ = c
m
~ m rn W
~ ~
Yl N M p
~ ~
N
` (7 N O m
Ol N
0
~m
E d
~ Q
m
o
0
m _ K~ Z 2 2
N ~
g v ~ v
a a
m
a
P-115
0 0
S 0 0 o co o ~m v o rn ~n o n eo m
~(I O
{O M O O (O O tU V O
W
O O N
1 10 ~ ~
'
N' O r - N~ O O {
p
N O Ol m O'
~
`~ O C1 C'1
N
o m N ~
M n r
~ ~ M m m e m m
= m M O •-
~u O R R Q
~o m r C7 07 N
m N
m
m e- o
N w m
10 ~l] N OJ N N
O ~I ^
U j
w w w w w w w w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of o 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 o e e
m oo SS SsassoS osooo
8ss sss
Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0
~ GI Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
°
°
°
°
° °
°
g ° °
°
°
°
°
°
° °
°
°
°
m o
o
oV
oV ~
oV ~
~
~~ o
o
a
N
~~ o o
o
o
o
o
o
N N o
o
o
o
o
~ fJ (J (J a N N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N N~
a aaa~'~ ?~~~~ ~3 `m m~mm mao~~~
c
m
rn
Q
'~ ~ c
m m
(L N ~ D D D D D D D U D D O L D D D D D D D C D D
m C C C C C
J J J J J C C C C C
J J J J J C C C C C C C
J J J J J J J C C C C C
J J J J J
~$ M ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
0 3 r c m 'm 'm 'm 'm m w w v m v o m d v m v v m d v v
m C m m m m m m N N m m W m m m m m m m m N m N m
~ m f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~
U E m m v w m m v m m m m u a'i m m v m m v m v v v
L j C 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ c w ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E f ~ ~ E
~ D t
c c
c
o t g
m c
uJ. °c c
Dc
>
Y E ~ D D Fj J J
LL LL D J
q y
_
u V m
Z D C J
_
LL V 7 J f~ _
C DC C J
~ D J O U C m
C J
LL C m` N C O U ~ ? G p J
LL C O m U
O O C x~ LL~ `t$ %~ LL o o % J a O u x J u ~p U
Z' LL O F ~' O Q a ~ ~' O Q Q f LL W a V Q¢ f- LL Q d a
Z Z
E
~ < u m~ N u a m i d 'v u a
i v~~ N '~
~ u '
~ m~ ~
v ~'~
~ m ~' rn
c
~ m~ ~ ~ n v~ m c
~ m m
S a ~
a
~ ~
Vl fn K 6 ~ a a
N K Q U K U Q U y
6
~ m ° ~ m ~
m Q o,
i L Y L
m i
N I
N I
N I
N
F m
a 3 3 3 3
~ N
~
v`~ m m
N m m
m
a a ¢ Q
~
c
~ m
~
E E
W 6
D r
.. U o 'o
0
c
°
K E E
m m
o o q q
O ci r1
o g °o °o
N N N N
O
Z O
Z O
Z O
2
~ O O O
LL LL LL LL
U U U U
N
m
a
P-7 7 6
m
O ~
U j
it
s
n ~
g
N
~ O
_ «I
a'
m m n n o n o m
~ r o N m o n O m o D o m
n m m a o n m
m
y
m r m M o o m ry o .n m O v
~ o 0 o
o m n ~ o n m
n ~ c
i, N
m !~ N m 1~ O N m r ~O p
O N O I~ n O) O O m M C'1 N O M m
~ O V
m m m O O'
O O1 N m
m N I~ ' O N
M ~O O m O• ' m
i0 OI m M n
~ O) ~ N
_
m M N N m m 41 N O m M O] 0) C] m V ~O
O n M N N [
O
N
O ~ m m m W
M N ~-
r N M N M
w w w » w w w
v o o a e s a a o a e e v e o e a• v e a >° ve o ;2 ~ o ;e
o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 o g o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 o d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z 'Z 2 2 Z
pp m
O o 0 0~ 0 0 0
r M r
m a. m m m rn m m
Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z 2 2 2 2 Z
p m m
0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ~ r
r M M
rn m m m ~ `m
Q Q Q Q Q Q
~Z 2 Z Z Z Z
0 0 0 0
O O O O
Cl M M M M M
n n 1~ n r n
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q
Z Z Z Z Z Z 1Z
r r r n n n r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N C
~O N ~O l0 N ul m
` N N N N (\I N
C
m
m
Q
y ~ C
N
~y, N p
~
D a 'O U a a a 'O
a 9 a a a "O
a a a a a a
C C C C C C
a a a a a a a
C C C C
C C
N C C C C C C C C
J J J J J J>> C C C C C C
J J J J>>
J J J J J J ?
~ J J J
~~ ~ ~ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL
O; L C `m m 0 m v p m m d w u m p y 9 m p p 0 m N p p y 0 m N
E P! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ v~ t' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l
p C A m m m m W N p m p N N N N W p p 10 p p p N p m
0 m m p M
~ p f ~ ~ '2 ~ ~ ~ rG ~ ~ ~ `G ~ °L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~ L G ~ ~ `2 ~ p
U f a T T T T T T T T T T T T T T
m p m m m m T T T T T T
m p m m m m T T T T T T T
p m m m m p O)
m
p
O~ a m m m p m p m m
C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C ~
C C C C C C a
L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ c w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ a L a a
m p
O L ~
p LL c
Z' m p
~ O
a Fi LL a c ac
C
a Ti a c
C
p
C
a ac c
C
a a c Q
C C
U v L
A Z p_ C C J J
LL C~ N O IL 8 LL .
~
C p J
lL C O` IL J J C 3
O U
LL C LL C J
p C
J
O
L O LL
U O a~a~
,,
C I
~
N LL V a a W
~ 6 W a
~ F'
a Ii a y o Q h
E
p N n
m 6
m Z 3 ~ m c n E p
m
m Z o c m n p
N
m 2 E Ti w o.
' N O
Z m ~ rv `m n
'
E a 'S p m C d u m 'tZ N m~ '<t
E p m v m
V
.
~ tZ N
J c O Q~
~ p m
c
m p yy m p E c a
v'
9 K
Q d
6 p >
m c
d
N K ~ 6 o m e
m a
N K K
=
` m
~
K Q Q m s a` 3
N Q
(
0
= = a
a
O
d
m
P
m
P
W Q W
LL p
LL p
LL N
LL
C
N
N
N
N
F a 3 3 3 3
N
N
etl m
~ (")
~ p
q
N N w
m m p
Q Q C m
p C C
O
m ~
!~ ~
~ E
m w
m i
0 0 ~ c
c
p n
E n
E c
K c
y
o q o
~ 0
N N N
Z Z Z Z
~ O O
U
P-117
C
d
m
a
u
N p
IL N
m ~Cc ~
O S L
qE ~ ~
O N
0
U ~ ~
O ~ 9
Y
~ = w
~ a $
Q m O
L f
_ N m
U U $
O O
Z LL
E
E
N
m n O m 0 0 O N N O O
m N O t~ 0 0 O N a7
r ~
non o 0 o ~ m
m
r M in r m m
r .= m vi vi
m m °' vNi uNi
l
~
U > In N
w w w
a o~ e° D o v e
I
?' °o o °o °0 0 0 0
> o 0 0 o c o 0 0
c
m ¢a¢aaa¢a
z z z `z z z z z
m o
f
0 0 0
^^
N p
0 0 0
S
N 41 O 0 0 0
0 0 0
I
~
a N N N N~ N
c
m
C C C C C C C C
d
y IL lL li li 1~ IL IL IL
~ ~ ~
T T T T T T T T
C C C C C C C C
~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~
d
E ~
LL
c
i v
~ >, 8> hi
C 9
LL C LL O ~ O pp
O U
'
~
H V
4 a a V
m
~ y
~ 2
~+ u o~ m ~
n
a
n m 4 0
o m c i0
wa: a
+
aac~_= a3
° ` °
~
m ~
`ma °
C ~
N
_
~ ~
F a
m
m
m
0
a ~
~ c
N O
N
O
o a
c m
o E
m a
N
0
0
O
N
O
Z
LL
U
ai
O
Z
m
a
N
m
c
E
U
0
t
u
OT
C
U
M
d y~
C
d
~E10~
d E~
c R E N
O~ fAM
O t
o _ u
d ~ 0 ~
~~ o~
a
~a°
v
1, s$„~s.~+a. t~.
pp ,s
R.
~~
> m ~
N N I r
w
m
f i
N N d
W
O
sz
~, , m
a~
o~
M~
~~ o
0
o Q m m o°
x3 ro n d
o °
a
poo ~ g g °o
mj o° °o G
0 o e
.on ~ ~
0
r- o
ai
b m
~ W
~'
mm
a-'
N
C
E
m
N
m
0
0
O
O
O
a
0
0
O
O
W
m yy
C y~
m
U
d c
L' ¢ ~
E `~ ~+
o °w ~
U u ~
O~ N N
N O~
o ~O
m
0
m °o a
N O
O
O
O
O
A
U ~
C m
m ~
`o
T ~
jm- ~ 0
a
is
~ m ~ `u
m
!U Q W
P-118
~a~
F U
o a >°
o ~~
C
a° °~
s
n
O
N
M
t+l
4
O
N
O
f+l
a
o -
C
n o
m
~ rc
N ~0
~ q
n f
9z
0
og
~m
> "'
qo
''4
m
N
V C
W `n d
= m E
E h
~ ~~
'a p> ~ o
C N - N
7 C ~ ^
O ~ N ~
~ '+g L
'd0 O p ~°
C M: O ~
~a°OC~
U ~
a
~~
L ~
a'
4
a
N_ ~ pO N
~ N N
[~ M d
a ~ 3
0
r) A N hl r
r1 0
Obi r °n ~ Gw
N N N 0 W
0 o in
N On Oh G
S O i O O °
°o o ~ °o
S g i ~ °o $
n e r
° u~ °n °o v°i
N
ri r d a v
m mo v°~ ° y~
N N P O C
s.o sss
o S o S o
a o 0 0 0
~ ° °o °o
N N ~ N O
m e
Qo 00
N_ N N
N £1 N
8 ~8
S o
0 0
s ~ Y
Z Z Z
2 <
O m h
LL Z Q
Q Q C'l
U O
LL W
m, o
Z E % 2 Z
Q ~ .~ QJQ QJQ ~
Z < I K K
0 O! W W 9
Z m W W x
~ 9 LL LL
c
r B ~'
N N
m j
u
N
C °o O o 0
6
a` U
m u
a ~
a m
w
Y z ¢ ~
s
E ~ i9
E A d ^ m
~ N ! d 1~1
U T ILL M t'1
'm
e
m
a
S
e:
g°o
rl
N
s
8
°o
~;
°
0
8
T
b
N
a
A
~°-
P-119
J d yr
f U ~
O ~ ~
o °~
o rc
a = ~
a
8
0
Q
0
a
~ ~
°
a>°
-
~ S
d a e
E
y
CU O O O
_
v~
~~ $ g
g
3 g
o
W
~ A q
c -~ I
I
I
8
O O
E
g ~
m
~3
`
o
f
~ mss °e
!~
0 q S
V 6 O
N ~
d w M ° ~
+' C L
df
-
_
V
Y
Q 1
E
c
d
C
C R ~ L
3 C T Or
f0 ~
O
~
~ ~ `e~
01 p •~ « ~o
~ O v ~
7 ~+ Q m
~-
N
°
~
~a mA
U r y~
w
m
m
~~
8
8
8
_„
~ o S o
q
mm
~
I
$
S
i
i
~I
~
s
~
~
N ~ N
9
a i
c
~
m
x
`m
E
n
~' u
N
e 4) c
c c
o $
U
m
a u
c
~ m
~
a
n m
E _
N
~
U o
U
LL
~
STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: April 20, 2011
To:
P-121
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle. Community Services Director
By: Daniel Schneider, Community Services Supervisor
Subject: APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
DISTRICT (AQMD) FOR A WAIVER OF FEES FOR USE OF THE EPICENTER
SPECIAL EVENT AREA ON FRIDAY, JUNE 17 AND SATURDAY, JUNE 18, 2011, TO
CONDUCT THEIR ELECTRIC LAWN MOWER EXCHANGE EVENT
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the use of the Epicenter Special Event Area on Friday,
June 17`h and Saturday, June 18th by South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) for their
Electric Lawn Mower Exchange Event and waive associated rental fees.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS:
The City has received a request from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) to hold
their Electric Lawn Mower Exchange event at the Epicenter again this year. Through this program, _
residents can exchange their operable, gasoline-powered lawn mowers for a zero emission cordless
electric lawn mower provided by the AQMD for the cost of $100.00. This year AQMD is offering a choice
of two makes and four models of lawn mowers to the consumers.
AQMD is proposing to move onto the Epicenter site on Friday, June 17th for set up between 10:00 a.m.
and 1:00 p.m., so the trailers of new mowers and dumpsters that will receive the old mowers can be set
up in advance. AQMD will provide private security overnight at the site to safeguard their equipment and
supplies. AQMD staff will be on site starting at 6:00 a.m. on Saturday, June 18~' to finish their set-up.
The actual event will be open to the public (participants must be able to show proof of residence in
AQMD's service area -all of Orange County, and major portions of Los Angeles, San Bemardino and
Riverside counties) on Saturday, June 18'h from 8:00 am until 12-noon. AQMD will clean up the site and
move out their equipment by 3:00 pm. Like last year, participants are required to pre-register to take
advantage of this opportunity. AQMD estimates that nearly 800 San Bemardino County residents will
participate in the event in Rancho Cucamonga.
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the fees associated with the proposed Electric Lawn
Mower event hosted by AQMD, as this event will help residents "clean the air that we breathe."
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact to the City for the waiver of rental fees associated with this event is $2,000. AQMD
would still be required to provide evidence of liability insurance as well as an additional endorsement
naming/the City of Rancho Cucamonga as additionally insured for the event.
Kevin MiSArdle
Community Services Director
I:ICOMMSERVICOUncYBBOartlslCllyCOUrraT SYaflRepatM2010
P-122
STAFF REPORT {
PLANNING DEPAR"fMENT
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
Date: April 20, 2011
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
By: Shiriedel Acayan, Planning Aide
Subject: MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2011-00191 - NA WONG - A request to implement
the use of the Mills Act to reduce the property tax for the Emery House, a Designated
Historic Landmark, located at 7403 Archibald Avenue - APN: 1077-011 ~3.
RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends the approval of
a Mills Act Agreement by the adoption of the attached Resclution of Approval and to
authorize the Mayor to sign the Mills Act Agreement.
BACKGROUND: The Emery House was designated by the City Council as a historical
landmark on January 7, 1981. This house is believed to be one of two homes in the area
that was ordered from a 1908 Sears/Roebuck model catalog. The house remains in its
original location, facing Archibald Avenue south of Base Line Road. The current owners are
now requesting to implement the use of the Mills Act for the Emery House property.
ANALYSIS: The Historic Preservation Commission considered the Draft Mills Act Agreement
on April 13, 2011, and a copy of that staff report is attached for reference as Exhibit "A."
The use of the Mills Act Agreement will provide tax property savings every year. These tax
savings will be used to complete the replacement of windows, painting, landscaping,
repairing, and restoring any deterioration as needed.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is categorically exempt under
Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental
Quality Act.
Resp ully submitted,
~~ ~~~`~`
Jame .Troyer, AICP
Plann g Director .
JRT: SA\ge
Attachments: Exhibit A -Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report, dated April 13, 2011
Exhibit B -Draft Resolution of Approval for Mills Act Application
P-123
,
STAFF REPORT `
PLANNING DEPAR"I'MEN'I' ~
RANCHO
Date: April 13, 2011 C,UCAMONOA
To: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission
From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
By: Shiriedel Acayan, Planning Aide
Subject: MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2011-00191 - NA WONG - A REQUEST TO
IMPLEMENT THE USE OF THE MILLS ACT TO REDUCE PROPERTY TAX FOR THE
EMERY HOUSE, A DESIGNATED HISTORIC LANDMARK LOCATED AT 7403
ARCHIBALD AVENUE - APN: 1077-011-43.
BACKGROUND: The Emery house was designated by the City Council as a historical landmark on
January 7, 1981. The house remains in its original location, facing Archibald Avenue south of
Base Line Road. The current owners are now requesting to implement the use of the Milts Act for
the Emery House property.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is a rectangular-shaped parcel located south of the
intersection of Base Line Road and Archibald Avenue. It is approximately 0.58 acre. A General
Plan Amendment (DRC2009-00716) and Development. District Amendment (DRC2009-00717) were
approved on April 7, 2010, to amend the land use and Development District Maps from
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre), for consistency
with the residential use. Properties to the north and east are designated Neighborhood
Commercial. South of the site is designated Low Residential, and to the west of the site is
designated Office Professional.
ANALYSIS
A. Historical Significance: The design and materials of the structure were ordered from a 1908
Sears, Roebuck Model Home Catalog and shipped via railroad to the Cucamonga area. The
house is believed to be one of only two such houses in the area. From the railroad station,
the materials were. moved via wagon to the present site. Nathan Emery, owner of the site and
purchaser of the design and materials was assisted by John Klusman in the building of the
residence. John Klusman, a member of the Klusman family of local builders, was the founder
and builder of the Mission Winery (later to become the Virginia Dare Winery). Mr. Klusman
helped build a number of structuri;s in the area, was a citrus rancher, and president of the
Cucamonga Water District among a number of other community activities.
The house was in the Emery family until 1941, when it was taken over by the Federal Farm
Mortgage Corporation until 1944 when Jeff Stephenson purchased the structure. The site
was originally 10 acres of citrus and has since been sub-divided down into residential and
commercial sites.
Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act
Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed
and is attached for.reference (Exhibit E).
EX~IBiT A
P-124
HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFFREPORT-NA WONG
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2011-00191
April 13, 2011
The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to
protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance.
This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the property
owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax on the improvements. The
properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to
determine whether notable progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The
property taxes for the Emery house will be calculated based on the estimated Mills Act Value.
The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is
based on income potential and capitalization rate at the time of the assessment.
C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a
Class 31 Exemption of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend
approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2011-00191 to be forwarded to the City Council for final
action.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~
Jame .Troyer, AICP
Planni Director
JRT:SA\ds
Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - Ordinance No. 128 dated January 7, 1981
Exhibit C - Historic Resources Inventory dated August 2, 1987
Exhibit D - Photographs - 2011
Exhibit E -Agreement Schedule
P-125
~~~~~~~
P-7 26
ORDINANCE N0. 128
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
_ ETIWANDA RAILWAY STATION, THE EMERY HOUSE, AND
THE ETIWANDA CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH AS SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIG-
NATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
The City Council of the City of Ranchc Cucamonga, California
does ordain as follows':
SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the
- following features of the City have met the criteria established by
Ordinance 70 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the
recocmnendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these
features as Historic Landmarks of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
a. Etiwanda Railway Station, located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue.
b. The Emery House, located at,7403 Archibald Avenue.
c. The Etiwanda Congregational Church, located at 7126
Etiwanda Avenue.
SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City
Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same
to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least
once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of Sanuary, 1981.
AYES: Frost, Mikels, Bridge, Schlosser
NOES: None
ABSENT: Palombo
ATTEST:
Lauren M: Wasserman, City Clerk
~~~~~
~-[ ~f1
Phil -ip D. Schlosser, Mayor
_._-~ -
State of California -The Reso :Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECR EATIDN
HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY
IDENTIFICATION
1. Common name:
2. Historic name:
Strene Flouse
Ser No. 1730 - li - _
HABS_HAER_Loc ~ SHLNO.NRStatus_P-127
UTM: A 11-445390-3776'37n c
3. Street or rural address: ~lL09 4-chiba'd Av
Citv Rancho Cucamon ~a _Zio otor County ^a'^^
4. Parcel number: 1077--011-4~3
5. Present Owner: Strang, Ralph C. ar!^, s"?'!'ia_ .i Address: 7yl'~"? .4r~hiba.lr? Ave.
Oity P,ancho Cucaaon2a Zip 91 %~0 Ownership is: Public Private X,C
6. Present Use: Residence Original use: Residence
DESCRIPTION
7a. Architectural style:
7b. Bristly describe the present physical appearance of the site or rtructure and describe any major alterations from its
original condition:
A two story, vernacular ranch house style structure of wood clapboards, with a
single centered gable and covered porch with fieldstone foundation located on the
west side of the structure. The asbestos shingled roof has projecting eaves,
Double sashed windows are evenly spaced on both levels, with a fixed window in the
dining room. The lattice work on the north just to the east of the brick fireplace
is a recently added detached garden area visible from the dining roam window. The
materials for the house were ordered from a 1908 Sears, Roebuck Model Home Catalog
and delivered by railroad then brought to the current site. The house was
surrounded by 10 acres of citrus groves which have since been developed into
residential and commercial buildings.
B. Construction date:
Estimated Factual i e_, nR _
9. Architect Unlcnotm
10. Builder Vathari n=r.,
Assisted bV TOhn I71»ern~n
11. Approx. property size .(in feet)
Frontage ~ Depth
or approx. acreage, ~ O
12. Date(s) of enclosed photograph(s)
July 1987
13. Condition: Ezcellext X Good
0
Fair- Deteriorated _ No longer in existence _
14. Alterations: Small room added aooroximately 1950
15. Surroundings: (Check more than one if necessary) Open land -Scattered buildings _ Densely built-up
Residential $_Industrial -Commercial Other:
16. Threats to site: - None known ]i`Private development- Zoning _ Vandalism _
Public Works project Other:
17. Is [he structure: On its original sitel~_ Movedt Unknown?
18. Related features:
SIGNIFICANCE
19. Briefly state historical and/or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site.)
P-128
The structure's design and materials were ordered from a 1908 Sears, Roebuck
27ode1 Home Catalog and shipped via railroad to the Cucamonga area. The house is
believed to one of only two such houses in the area. From the rail station the
materials were moved via wagon to the present site. Nathan Emery, owaer of. the
site and purchaser of the design and materials was assisted by John Rlusman in
the building of the residence. John Rlusman, a member of the Rlusman family of
local builders, was a founder and builder of the Mission Winery (later to become
the Virginia Dare Winery). Mr. Rlusman helped build a number of structures in the
area, was citrus rancher, and president of the Cucamonga Water District among a
number of community activities.
The house teas in the Emery Family until 19-01, when it was taken over by the
Federal Farm 29ortgage Corporation until 19-04 when Jeff Stephenson purchased the
structure. The site was originally 10 acres of citrus and has since been sub-
divided down into residential and commercial sites.
20. Main theme of the historic resource: (lf more than one is
checked, number in order of~importance.)
Architecture 1 Arts & Leisure
Economic/Industrial _Exploration/Settlement
Government Military
Religion Social/Education
21. Sources (List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews
and their datesl.
San Bernardino County Lot Book 0,
nLight Over the Mountain, A History
of the Rancho Cucamonga Area", revised
edition, by Donald L. Clucas
22. Date form prepared 11•uwaws: 2-, 197
By (name) -
Organizatio~ C5 ~°y of`Ranc~ho Cucamonga
Addreu: P ~. pnx R07
City Ran ho Cs monga Zipg173f1
Phone: ~ (711!1 qRq-1 ASR
Locational sketch map (draw and label site end
surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarksl:
NORTH
r~
s
3As~- L{rt>`~ Ro~aD
.~~~ •.•~ • i.~uv • ~r rnnna nrvu necncn ~ gun
TASTER FILE HISTc .IC RESOURCES DATA ENCODING S. cT
P-129
NOTE: The numbers in parentheses indicate either The number of characters (letter, numbers, punctuation marks, spaces) that may
be entered or the number of lines that may be checked.
t. Ser.No. 1730 _ 11 __
City Zip (41 Form No. (1.41 Prop. No. (0-41
USGS Quad Map No. 141 2452
L UTM Zone (21 Fasting 161 Northing (7)
q li 44539(1 ~ 'i77F~t7n
B
C
D
10. Regisvation Status (11:
_ 11 listed -date (61 / / -41 may become eligible
.~2) determined eligible - X 51 eligible local listing
year (21 t GRl _6) ineligible for above
_31 appears eligible -7) undetermined
11. Property Given Registration Status as (1):
_71 part of distritt
x 2) individual property
_.3) both of above
3. Property Name:
Common Name (301: 12. NR Class Category 171:
Strdne House
Historic Nama (40)
Emery House
Parcel No, 10-771 1077-011-43
4. Address:
7403 Archibald Avenue
umber 10-5) Street Name (4-20)
Nearest Cross Street (0-20}
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
Gri/Town (3-201
91730 Vicinity of
Zip code (5) City!'fown (/)
County 3-letter designator (31 SBO
5. Type of Ownership (1-71:
_1) unknown
2) federal
_ 31 state
X 41 Private
_51 county
6) city
__ 7) special district
6. Present Use (1-61:
_1)unknown
2) commercial
~-3) residential
_4) private non-comm.
_ 5) public
_6) none
7. Year of Initial Construction:
Individual Property (41 1908
District (81
8. ArchiteM(s) (0-251:
Unknown
_~) district - No. of properties (0-3!
_2) site
x3i building
_41 svuctvre
_,51 object
13. Other Registration (0-91
~11Histaric Am. 61g. Survey x.61 Cal. Historical Landmark
_2) Historic Am. Eng. Rec. _.7} County Pt. of Hist Interest
-31 National Hist Landmar k-8) Local Listing
-41 Sate Historic Park -91 County/Regional Park
_5) other
14. Property Attributes:
_tl unknown _22! lake/river/reservoir
x 2) sing. family Prof. --23) ship
-3) mutt family prop. _.24) lighthouse
-41 ancillary blg, X51 amusement park
.51 hotel/motel _Z6) monumentlm ural/gravestone
61 comm. blg. t-3 st _27) folk art
- 7) comm. 6Ig. over 3 n. .281 street furniture
61 industrial blg, _29) landscape architr.
_ 91 Public utility blg. _30) trees/vegetation
_101 theatre ~1) urban open space
_111 engineering siruCt. _32) rural open space
_121 civic auditorium .331 farm/ranch
_131 cmnty aitr/soc. hall .341 military property
_141 government blg. _35) CCC/WPA svuctu re
_15) educational blg.. _361 ethnic minority property
_76) religious blg, ethnic group IS-201
.17} R/R depot
_181 train ..37) highway/trail
_791 bridge -381 women's property
~0) canal/aqueduct ..40) cemetery
~1) dam _391 other
8uilder(sl(0-25): 15. Arrhitecwral Plans
Ndthdn Emery & John K1 USmdn ~~ ~ and Specifications: Yes X No
9. Year of Survey (21: 87
DPR 660 (Rev. 12/831
P-130
PHOTO #1: front elevation (west eleva-
tion) of historic structure
PHOTO #3: Lefr side elevation (north
elevation) of historic structure
EX[~~~~~_ED
1
- ~-
r "_-= - .
I - ---_--
_ ---=
--- =-=~-
PHOTO #2: Rear elevation (east eleva-
tion) of historic structure
PHOTO #4: ]tight side elevation (south
elevation of historic structure
P-131
PHOTO #5: Looking southwest at the
nor~east corner of the historic structure
Photo #7: Looking northeast at the south-
west comer of the historic structure
Photo # 8: looking southeast at the north-
west corner of the historic structure
4
Pi-IOTO ~6: looking northwest ai the
southeast comer of the historic structure
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
H/STORIC PRESERVATION
MILLS ACT AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL:
"Structure/Property Ten-Year Rehabilitation Timeline"
(To be completed by the Applicant)
~'~~~~'
Please fist the improvements which are intended to take place over the next 10 years.
List them in order of owner's priority.
YEAR IMPROVEMENT
~~E L t=1~ S
~~ r
I certifythat I am presently the legal ownerofthe subject property. Further, I acknowledge
the supplemental information on this form will be used as an exhibit attached to the Mills
Act Agreement.
Date: E~'e-t~ _ ~~a~. moll Signature: /yC(/
" See attached list for potential projects for consideration.
" All improvement projects must meet City requirements and Secretary of Interior's Rehabilftation Standards.
" Improvement projects will be reviewed by Planning Staff to ensure appropriateness.
P-132
~XE-61~3i1" ~ ~~~"~~~~~
P-133
YEAR IMPROVEMENT
2011 Roof -Repair (house)
2011 Roof-Replace (garage/carport, barn)
2011 Seismic retrofit
2012 Foundation-Repair
2012 Siding-Repair, restore, repaint
2012 Window frame-Repair, replace with conforming
2012 Windows-Repair, replace with conforming, rescreen
2012 Exterior trim-Repair, repaint
2012 Deterioration-Remove, repair, restore
2012 Doors-Repair, replace, upgrade, rescreen
2013 Electrical-install, rewire, new outlets
2013 Fireplace-Repair, restore
2013 Porch-Repair, replace or rebuild in kind
2014 Lssulation-Install
2014 Plumbing-Replace
2015 Ceilings-Restore
2015 Walls-Restore
2015 Flooring Restore
2016 Patio-Replace
2017 Paint-Interior, exterior, eaves
2018 Remodel-Bathroom, kitchen, pantry
2018 Cabinets-Replace
2018 Trellis~eplace
2019 Exterior Stairs-Replace
2019 Interior Stairway-Repair
2020 Fencing-Replace
2020 Irrigation-Install
2021 Driveway-Repave
2021 Landscape-Remove overgrowth (front, back, side yards)
RESOLUTION NO. ~~"- ~S(
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MILLS ACT AGREEMENT NO.
J/-D°/S(ARTICLE 12, SECTION 50280 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT
CODE) FOR THE HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 7403
ARCHIBALD AVENUE, APN: 1077-011-43.
WHEREAS, both the owner and City desire to protect and preserve such
property so as to retain its characteristics of historical significance.
A. Recitals.
1. The owner(s), Na Wong, of the subject property have requested implementation of a
Mills Act (Article 12, Section 50280 of the California Government Code).
2. Designation of the subject property as a Historic Landmark is a requirement prior to
proceeding with the initiation of the Mills Act.
3. The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the
subject property as a Historic Landmark on January 7, 1981.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as
follows:
1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all ofthe fads set forth in the Recitals, Part
"A", of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. The parties in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth in the
attached Mills Act Contract marked Exhibits "A," "B-1," B-2," and "C" are agreed upon.
3. The City Council approves the Mills Act Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "1."
4. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has accepted to enter into an agreement (contract) with
the property owner, thus initiating the Mills Act.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2011.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
P-134
EXHIBIT B
P-135
MILLS ACT RESOLUTION NO.
Page 2
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, CMC, City Clerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California at a regular meeting of the said City Council held on the 20th day of
April, 2011.
Executed this 20th day of April, 2011, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice C. Reynolds, CMC, City Clerk
P-136
RECORDING REQUESTED 6Y
and when
RECORDED MAIL T0:
City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.0. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20th day Of A~ri1, 2011,
by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter
referred to as the "City") and Na wono (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner").
W I T N E S S E T H
A. Recitals.
(i) California Government Code Section 50280, et seq. authorize cities
to enter into contracts with the owners of qualified Historical Property to
provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so
as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance;
(ii) Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property,
together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as
the Emery House and generally located at the street address 7403 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucamonaa. cA 91730 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as
EXHIBIT 1 -1-
P-137
the "Historic Property"). a legal description of the Historic Property is
attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this
reference;
(iii) on aoril 20, 2011, the City ,Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No. thereby declaring and designating the
Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of
Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code; and,
(iv) city and owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into
this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical
significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an
assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of
Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
B. Agreement
Now, THEREFORE, City and owner, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows:
1. Effective Date and Term of gareement. This agreement shall be
effective and commence on aoril 20. 2011, and shall remain in effect for a term
of ten years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date,
such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2,
below.
2. Renewal. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of
this agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date"), a year shall
automatically be added to the initial term of this agreement unless notice of
nonrenewal is mailed as provided herein. If either owner or City desires in any
year not to renew the agreement, owner or City shall serve written notice of
nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal
date of the agreement. unless such notice is served by Owner to City at least 90
days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by City to Owner at least 60
days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to
the term of the agreement as provided herein. owner may make a written protest
-2-
P-138
of the notice. city may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the
Agreement, withdraw its notice to Owner of nonrenewal. If either City or owner
serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain
in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original
execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.
3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this
Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions,
requirements, and restrictions:
a. owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of
historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as
exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those
minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the
Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this
Agreement.
b. owner shall, where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the
property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic
Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance
with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the
applicant and approved by the city Council, attached hereto as exhibit "C."
c. owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior
appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by
representatives of the County Assessor, State department of parks and Recreation,
State Board of Equalization, and the City, as may be necessary to determine
Owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.
4. Provision of Information of corporation. owner hereby agrees to
furnish city with any and all information requested by the City which may be
necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of
this Agreement.
5. Cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as
set forth in California Government Code sections 50280, et seq., may cancel this
-3-
P-139
Agreement if it determines that owner breached any of the conditions of this
Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no
longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also
cancel this Agreement if it determines that the owner has failed to restore or
rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b),of this
Agreement. in the event of cancellation, owner may be subject to payment of
those cancellation fees set forth in California Government code sections 60260,
et seq.
6. Enforcement of Agreement. in lieu of and/or in addition to any
provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically
enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. in the event of a
default, under the provisions of this Agreement by owner, City shall give written
notice to owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated
in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable
satisfaction of the City within 36 days thereafter, or if not corrected within
such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said
breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that acts to cure the
breach or default may be commenced within 30 days and must thereafter be
diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then. City may, without further
notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any
action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of avner growing out of
the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive
relief against any violation by owner or apply for such other relief as may be
appropriate.
City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not
enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which
are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations
governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event
that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or
default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other
subsequent breach thereof or default herein under.
7. sindina Effect of Agreement. The owner hereby subjects the
Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations,
-4-
P-140
and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and owner hereby declare.
their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set
forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to
and be binding upon the owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to
the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument
hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion
thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and
accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in
this agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and
restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument.
City and owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that
the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein
touch and concern the land in that Owner's legal interest in the Historic
Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and owner hereby further
declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants,
reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and
maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the Historic
Property for the benefit of the public and owner.
8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this
Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified
below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto.
To City: city of 2ancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic center Drive
P.O. aax 807
rzancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attention: Planning Director
To Owner: Na Wong
7403 Archibald Avenue
aancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
-5-
P-141
9. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this
agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and
any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or
conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint
enterprise.
b. Owner agrees to and shall hold City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or
claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property
damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of owner or
those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on
his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic
Property. owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected
officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions
for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of Owner's
activities in connection with the Historic Property. this hold harmless
provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to
have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this agreement
regardless of whether or not the city prepared, supplied or approved the plans,
specifications or other documents for the Historic Property.
c. all of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and
restrictions contained in this agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to
the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal
representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the
Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever.
d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or
parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations,
or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any
party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all
reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs
and other relief ordered by the court.
-6-
P-142
e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are
held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by
subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the
remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.
f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance
with the laws of the state of California.
1U. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and
enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in
the office of the County Recorder of the County of san Bernardino. The owner
shall be responsible for any fees required by the county for recording this
Agreement.
11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part,
only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, city and Owner have executed this Agreement on the
day and year first written above.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dated:
Dated:
ay:
By:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Na wong, Owner
-7-
P-143
2011 All Capacity Acknowledgment
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
On ,before me, Kathryn L. Scott, Assistant City Clerk
of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared L. Dennis Michael,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me
that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature
on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person
acted, executed the instrument.
certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of
California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of Officer
Kathryn L. Scott, CMC
Assistant City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
-s-
P-144
All Capacity Acknowledgement
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
On before me,
(Date) (Name and Title of the officer)
Personally appeared
(Name of person signing)
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) islare
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helshelthey executed the same in
hislheNtheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislherltheir signature(s) on the instrument the
person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJRY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature of officer
(Seal)
-9-
P-145
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
for
Na Wong
7403 Archibald avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
CUCAMONGA FRUIT LANDS W 335 FT S 74 FT N 1/2 LOT S AND W 335 FT N 16 FT 5 1/2 LOT
8 SEC 2 TP 15 R 7W MEAS TO C/L ARCHIBALD AVE EX ST
Exhibit "A"
-10-
P-146
THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS
1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a
property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or
site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its originally
intended purpose.
2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure,
or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or
alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features
should be avoided when possible.
3. all buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of
their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek
to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.
4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the
history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its
environment.
S. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which
characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with
sensitivity.
6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced,
wherever possible.
In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the
material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other
visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features
should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by
historical, physical, or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural
designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other
buildings or structures.
7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle
means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage
the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.
8.EVery reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological
resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection,
stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction
project.
9. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties
shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy
significant historic, architectural, or cultural material and such design is
compatible with the size, scale, color, material, and character of the
property, neighborhood, or environment.
10. wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done
in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed
in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be
unimpaired.
Exhibit "B-1"
-11-
P-147
PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
Property Maintenance. all buildings, structures, yards and other
improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the
appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are
prohibited:
1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences,
roofs, doors, walls, and windows;
2. Scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris;
3. abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles,
automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or
similar items;
4. stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas;
5, any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly
by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location.
EXHIBIT "B-2"
-12-
P-148
POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS
for
Na Wong
7403 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete.
Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this
contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission's staff.
ITEM YEAR TASK
1. 2011 ROOF - Repair (House)
2. 2011 Roof - Replace (garage/carport, barn)
3. 2011 Seismic retrofit
4. 2012 Foundation - Repair
5. 2012 Siding - Repair, restore, repaint
6. 2012 window frame - Repair, replace with conforming
7. 2012 windows - Repair, replace with conforming, rescreen
8. 2012 Exterior trim - Repair, repaint
9. 2012 Deterioration - Remove, repair, restore
10. 2012 Doors - Repair, replace, upgrade, rescreen
11. 2013 Electrical - Install, rewire, new outlets
12. 2013 Fireplace - Repair, restore
13. 2013 porch - Repair, replace or rebuild in kind
14. 2014 Insulation - install
15. 2014 Plumbing - Replace
16. 2015 ceilings - Restore
17. 2015 walls - Restore
18. 2015 Flooring - Restore
19. 2016 Patio - Replace
20. 2017 Paint - interior, exterior, eaves
21. 2018 Remodel - Bathroom, kitchen, pantry
22. 2018 Cabinets - Replace
23. 2018 Trellis - Replace
24. 2019 Exterior Stairs - Replace
25. 2019 Interior Stairway - Repair
26. 2020 Fencing - Replace
27. 2020 Irrigation - install
28. 2021 Driveway - Repave
29. 2021 Landscape - Remove overgrowth (front, back, side yards)
EXHIBIT "C"
-13-
P-149
STAFF REPORT
COMMUMTY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director
By: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst III
Subject: RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
In accordance with the City Council's request to become more informed
projects and events, this report is provided to highlight pertinent issues,
occurring in the Community Services Department. This report is provided
informational purposes only.
Seniors:
of recreation programs,
projects and programs
to the City Council for
• The following table highlights some senior activities that took place during March 2011 as well
as the total number of registrations for the year for Wellness Pass, Senior Transportation and
Table Tennis.
Activity Date Number of
Partici ants
Dinner and a Movie March 1, 2011 56
Pool Tournament March 4, 2011 16
Bi Band Dance March 12, 2011 154
St. Patrick's Da Part March 17, 2011 210
Senior Birthda s March 30, 2011 187
Wellness Pass - A es 60+ Total Re istered Janua -March 2011 - 562
Wellness Pass - A es 50-59 Total Re istered Janua -March 2011 - 237
Silver Fox Ex ress Total Re istered Janua -March 2011 - 23
Senior Contract Classes -Exercise Winter Session - 2,273
Senior Contract Classes -Art Winter Session - 146
Senior Contract Classes -Dance Winter Session - 1,103
Table Tennis Jul 2010 -March 2011 -181
• Uocoming Senior Activities are summarized below:
Activi Date Time
Pool Tournament Aril 1, 2011 1:00 .m.
Dinner and a Movie Aril 5, 2011 5:00 .m.
Bi Band Dance A rit 9, 2011 7:00 .m.
Senior Volunteer A reciation Aril 12, 2011 9:00 a.m.
Spring Fling April 21, 2011 9:00 a.m.
P-150
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20. 2011
PAGE 2
Activit Date Time
Senior Advisory Committee Outreach
Pro'ect -Rancho Mesa Care Center April 22, 2011 10:30 a.m.
Senior Birthda s Aril 27, 2011 11:00 a.m.
Health RC Senior Walk Aril 29, 2011 10:30 a.m.
Black and White Gala Ma 7, 2011 6:00 .m.
• It is anticipated that the Senior Advisory Committee will hold its monthly meeting on Monday,
April 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at the James L. Brulte Senior Center.
• Participation in the Senior Nutrition Program for the month of March 2011 is summarized in the
table
Week Date Partici ants
1 3/1! throw h 3/4/2011 817
2 3/7 throw h 3/11/2011 1,077
3 3/14 throw h 3/18/2011 1,016
4 3/21 throw h 3/25/2011 962
5 3/28 throw h 3/31/2011 810
Total meals served for the month of March 2011: 4,682
Senior Services:
• The table below summarizes participation in Senior Services activities for the month of March
2011:
Pro ram Number of Partici ants
Blood Pressure Screenin 15
Resource Libra 224
Bereavement Su ort 14
Elder Law Private Counselin 30
HICAP 3
Peo le with Arthritis Can Exercise 332
Sit and Be Fit 455
Special Needs Programs:
• The table below highlights Special Needs activities that took place during March 2011:
Activit Stait Date Number of
Partici ants
Star Performers -Intermediate Janua 12, 2011 8
Jazz and Hi Ho - S ecial Needs March 3, 2011 7
Ta - S ecial Needs March 3, 2011 4
Martial Arts - Be innin March 7, 2011 3
Martial Arts -Intermediate March 7, 2011 5
Self Defense for Girls and Women March 7, 2011 2
Frida Ni ht Fun Club - Karaoke and Potluck March 18, 2011 9
P-151
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
• Upcoming Special Needs activities are summarized below:
Activ' Date
Mixed Martial Arts A ril 2, 2011
Star Performers A ril 6, 2011
IncredABLE Athletes -Basketball A ril 7, 2011
Jazz and Hi Ho - S ecial Needs A ril 7, 2011
Movement and Tumblin - S ecial Needs A ril 7, 2011
Ta - S ecial Needs A ril 7, 2011
Frida Ni ht Fun Club - "Wild West" Prom 2011 A ril 22, 2011
Mixed Martial Arts A ril 30, 2011
Tech Junction:
• The table below summarizes participation in Tech Junction activities for March 2011:
PAGF,3
Senior Computer Classes Start Date Number of
Partici ants
Intro to Email March 1, 2011 5
Intro to T in March 4, 2011 6
Intro to Excel March 7, 2011 5
Intro to Surfin the Intemet March 14, 2011 7
Mana in Multimedia March 14, 2011 12
Public Computer Classes Start Date Number of
Partici ants
Com uter Assisted Genealo Februa 7, 2011 7
Excel S readsheet Februa 15, 2011 7
Intro to Internet and Email Februa 15, 2011 5
Intro to Microsoft Excel Februa 15, 2011 20
EBa Worksho March 12, 2011 19
Intro to Com uters and Internet March 29, 2011 9
Intro to Microsoft Excel it March 29, 2011 2
Intro to Microsoft Word March 29, 2011 5
Intro to Typing and Microsoft
Word March 29, 2011 1
Tech Junction Time Frame Number of
Partici -ants
Dro -In Use March 2011 795
Senior Classes March 2011 133
Public Classes March 2011 216
Total Uses/Users March 2011 1,144
• Upcoming Computer Class activities are summarized below
Senior Com uter Classes.. Class Start Date
Microsoft Word 2007 A ril 4, 2011
Power Point 2007 A ril 5, 2011
Intro to T in A ril 8, 2011
Excel Worksho A ril 19, 2011
Intro to Facebook A ril 25, 2011
Public Com uter Classes Giass Start Date
Com uter Assisted Genealo A ril 4, 2011
P-7 52
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
Trips and Tours:
PAGE 4
Trip Date Number of
Partici ants
Santa Anita Race Track March 3, 2011 45
"Beau and the Beast" - Pants es Theatre March 20, 2011 36
London and Paris multi-da tri March 24-31, 2011 2
NASA Jet Pro ulsion Laborato March 31, 2011 44
• Uocoming Trips and Tours are summarized below:
Tri Date
The Flower Fields -Carlsbad Aril 13, 2011
Edward Dean Museum and Gardens April 28, 2011
jfeaturingl6`"-19u' century European B Asian Art) -
Cher Valle
Human Services -Commodities
Date Number of Families
served Number of Individuals
serves
Monda ,March 3, 2011 432 714
Facilities:
• The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our
community facilities during the month of March 2011:
Facility Rentals Number of Rentals /
Bookin s Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
James L. Brulte Senior Center 50 / 109 3,445 25,020
Gold S. Lewis Communit Center 109 / 240 4,723 17, 207
Youth:
• The table below summaries Youth Program Attendance for the month of March.
Program Classes /Sites. Registrants /Attendance
Pla school 45 / 4 671 / 3,462
Lewis Partnership Kids Club @ Del
Mar, & Terra Vista Apartments 2 sites 427
- Playschool: Third Quarter classes began on February 22nd
P-153
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
Teens:
• The table below summarizes Teen Program attendance for the month of March.
PAGE 5
Pro ram / Activit Attendance /Partici ation
Teen Center 440 Partici ants; 210 S ectators
St. Pa 's Teen Dance 200 Partici ants
March Madness 60 Partici ants
Teen Staff Meetin 9 Partici ants
TRAC Meetin 14 Volunteers
TRAC -Snack Bar 26 Volunteers
TRAC -Bunco Bab sittin 2 Volunteers
Skate Park 2,840 Partici ants / 1,520 S ctators
Facilities:
• The table below illustrates the number of rentals/bookings and attendance figures for our
community facilities during the month of March.
Facility Rentals Number of Rentals /Bookings Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
Lions Center East 27160 375 3,507
Lions Center West 26 / 118 795 892
RC Family Resource Center -Human Services:
• The table below summarizes Center Programs/Workshoos Attendance for the month of March.
Pro ram / Worksho Attendance /Partici ation
Faith Based Communi 70
AI -Anon/Ala-Teen 93
Alcohol Anon mous 118
Communit Closet Giveawa 230
De artment of Children Services 80
De ressive Bi olar Su ort 73
Famil Fun Ni ht 67
House of Ruth Domestic Violence Class 113
Leadin Ladies -Rainbow Readin Club 48
Le al Aid Socie -Free referrals 123
Math Tutorin 86
Parentin Classes Para Los Nino's 58
Resurrection Ministries Pathfinders 87
Safe Kids -Car Seat Checks 63
Women on the Move 57
Youth Accountabilit Board 35
RC Famil Resource Yard Sale 1,000
TOTAL 2,401
P-154
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20.2011
PAGE 6
The table below summarizes the Clients Served by Each Agency Housed at the Resource
Center for the month of March.
A encies Housed at the Resource Center Number of Clients Served
Touch Ministries 136
Beaut for Ashes 73
House of Ruth 123
Ea le's Wins 33
Li ht House Leamin Center 36
Leadin Ladies 37
Para Los Nino's 53
TOTAL 491
Facilities:
• The table below illustrates the number of rentals and attendance figures for our wmmunily
facilities during the month of March.
Facility Rentals Number of
Rentals Rental
Attendance Building
Attendance
RC Famil Resource Center 5 600 3,492
Volunteers:
• The table below summarizes the Community Services Department's volunteer usage for the
month of February 2011.
Division February 2010
Number of Number Dollar
Volunteers of Hours Value' February 2011
Number of Number Dollar
Volunteers of Hours Value'
Administration 5 15 $330 5 15 $349
Senior Services 127 1,759 $38,645 140 1,884 $43,878
Human Services 44 176 $3,867 74 239 $5,566
S orts 131 1,529 $33,592 125 1,756 $40,897
S ecial Events - - $0 - $0
Performin Arts 77 887 $19,487 76 810 $18,865
Teens 15 80 $1,758 21 122 $2,841
Youth Pro rams 12 302 $6,635 22 164 $3,820
Totals 411 4,748 $104,314 463 4,990 $118,217
'Based on $21.97/hour- Stafe average as determined the Callforn/a Independent Sector.
"*Based on $23.29/hr- Sfate average as determined by the Ca/i/ornia Independent Sector.
Youth Sports:
• The table below and on the following page summarizes Youth Sports Activities for the March
reporting period:
Activity Number of
Partici -ants Age/Gender Number
of Teams
Pee Wee Winter Basketball 245 3-5 - bo s & iris 24
Northtown Build-A-Beat Drums 17 5-17 - bo s & irls N/A
P-155
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
PAGE 7
Activity Number of
Partici ants Age/Gender Number
of Teams
Northtown Kun -Fu Karate 10 417 - bo s & irls N/A
Northtown Hi -Ho 3 5-14 - bo s & irls N/A
Northtown Youth Soccer 32 6-14 - bo s & iris 4
Northtown C.A.S.A Cooking
Class 23 9-17 & 18+ -boys
& irls NIA
Northtown Teen Volunteer
Meetin 8 12-16 -boys &
irts N/A
Youth Basketball Clinic 62 6-14 - bo s & irls N/A
Youth Volleyball 396 7-16 -girls 36
Youth Basketball 720 6-16 -boys & girls 82
RC Family Sports Center:
• The table below provides drop-in/open plav and rental participation at the Center for the
reporting period:
Activity Number df
Partici ants
Adult Basketball 766
Youth Basketball 796
Adult Ra uetball 299
Youth Ra uetball 38
Adult Volle ball 18
Youth Volle ball 103
Adult Walle all 3
Youth Walle ball 47
Jazzercise 1331
Rentals 204
Youth Judo 116
Youth Volle ball Practice 63
Youth Basketball Practice 181
Adult Sports:
The table below summarizes adult sport activities for the reporting period:
Activity Number of
Partici ants. Number
of Teams Gender
Softball 1,550 160 Males & Females
Adult Basketball 204 26 Males
Ra uetball 8 NA Males & Females
Tennis 13 NA Males & Females
Soccer 572 23 Males & Females
Monda Ni ht Dro -In 55 N/A Males & Females
• There was one Adull Softball Tournament during the month of March at the Epicenter.
P-156
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
Cultural and Performing Arts:
• The table below summarizes Theatre Arts Academy classes during March 2011:
Activi Participants /Attendance
Actin in Performance 19
Broadwa Babies 93
Comed Im rov 9
Showsto rs . 139
Sin in for a Lifetime 48
Teen Actor's Bootcam 65
Video Production 14
Youth Theatre Worksho 74
TOTAL 461
Community Theatre rehearsals/auditions included the following during March 2011:
Activi Partici ants/Attendance
The Man Who Came to Dinner
Rehearsals 65
• Other rehearsals/auditions/programs/previews included the following during the reporting
period:
• Court Yard Programs included the following during the reporting period:
Date Activi Attendance
Friday, March 11, 2011 Rancho Cucamonga Foundation
Communit Concert 200
Rental Activities:
PAGE 8
• The table below and on the following page summarizes rental activities in Celebration Hall and
Imagination Courtyard at the Cultural Center for the reporting period:
Celebration Hall; Cou ard, and Lobb Rental Events
Date Event Attendance
Saturday, March 5, 2011 Memorial Service 130
Tuesday, March 8, 2011 National Association of Hispanic
Real Estate Professionals 160
Saturday, March 12, 2011 Wedding 150
TOTAL 440
Communi Services De artment -Celebration. Hall. Events
Date Event Attendance
Saturda ,March 5, 2011 The Man Who Came To Dinner -Cast
Pa 35
P-157
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
Communi Services De antment =Celebration Hall Events
Date Event Attendance
Wednesday, March 30,
2011 Rancho Cucamonga Community
Foundation - Worksho 18
TOTAL 53
Libra Celebration Hall Events
Date Event Attendance
Wednesday, March 2, 2011 Dr. Seuss Birthday 87
Thursday, March 3, 2011 Mystery Book Club 12
Thursday, March 17, 2011 Going Green 50
Saturday, March 19, 2011 Library Telethon 60
Sunday, March 20, 2011 Library Telethon 20
Wednesday, March 30,
2011 Library Meeting 20
TOTAL 249
Volunteer Events
Date Event Attendance
Friday, March 4, 2011 Man Who Came to Dinner
Preview 27
Lewis Family Playhouse:
During the reporting period, the Lewis Family Playhouse was host to a wide variety of
productions, community proorams and private rentals.
PncE 9
Lewis Tamil 'Pla house Professional) Presented Productions
SHOW
DATE Tickets
Distributed NUMBER OF
EVENTS
M-Pact Frida March 25, 2011 317 1
Jason Bisho Ma is Saturda ,March 26, 2011 531 1
Lewis Tamil ;'Pla houserCommumt ,Theatre / Broadwa' :' the Gardens Rroductiorts .`..:
SHOW
DATE Tickets
Distributed NUMBER OF
EVENTS
The Man Who Came to Dinner 3/5/11-3113/11 1,112 5
Le ~is Tamil Pia ,house.L""i'bjr8 ,ard,Other~til ,Events ,
SHOW
DATE Approx
Attendance NUMBER OF
EVENTS
Lrbra Telethon 2011 3/19-3/20/2011 350 2
The table above reflects number of tickets sold fw various per/ormances during the reporting period. It does not reflect
actual patrons in attendance.
P-158
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 2Q, 2011
Cultural Center Lobby:
PAGE 10
The Lobby to the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center is open to the public six days a week. During
the reporting period, 804 local residents visited the public areas at the Cultural Center.
Parks:
• The table below provides usage information for park picnic shelters and special use facilities for
the month of March 2011.
Park Shelter Attendance Number of
Rentals
Da Creek 224 7
Garcia Park 35 2
Herita a 480 11
Hermosa 200 4
Milliken 207 9
Mountain View 205 5
Red Hill 902 16
ictoria Arbors 325 7
OTAL 2,578 61
Equestrian Participants:?
S ectators:6 4
'Eques6ian parflclpanfs inclutle tlrop-in use.
• Park monitors continue to keep daily reports of activities in our parks, often helping out residents
in need of assistance.
Equestrian Center:
Staff continues to meet quarterly with users of the Equestrian Center (Alta Loma Riding Ctub,
Rancho Rebels 4-H, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy and Rancho Cucamonga Citizen Mounted
Patrol) to address maintenance needs and programming. ,
Special Events:
• Staff is working on the following upcoming events:
Event. Date /Time Location
Cinco de Mao Saturda , A ril 30 / 1-6:00 m Old Town Park
Cucamonga Challenge Saturday, May 7 / 8:00 am Pacific Electric Trail at Central
Park
Movies in Town Square Tuesdays (May 17 -June 14 ) I Dusk Victoria Gardens - Chaffey
Town S uare
Epicenter:
• The table below and on the following page notes rental events that took place at the Epicenter
during the month of March 2011:
Date Or anization Event Location
March 3 &
4~' Luscious Int./ Slightly
Small Films Symbicort Commercial
Filmin Epicenter Stadium
P-159
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
PAGE 11
Date Organization Event Location
March 7 Motion Theo IMB Commercial Filmin E icenter Stadium
March 17 Denison Universi Colle a Baseball Game E icenter Stadium
March 18 MJZ Mike's Hard Lemonade
Commercial Filmin Epicenter Stadium
Staff is working wish a number of organizations for potential activities at the Epicenter. The
table below outlines those potential activities.
Date Or anization Event Location
April 9 Multiple Sclerosis Society MS Walk 2011 Parking Lot G and
surrounding city
streets
A ril 17 Quakes non-rental Youth Baseball Clinic E icenter Stadium
Aprii 23` Quakes (non-rental) Battle of the Baseline League
Hi h School Baseball Game Epicenter Stadium
Ma 15 American Cancer Socie Rela for Life Soccer Fields
May 13 Community Services Dept.
non-rental Playschool Graduation Epicenter Stadium
Ma 8 Quakes non-rental Youth Baseball Clinic E icenter Stadium
Ma 22" Quakes non-rental Youth Baseball Clinic E icenter Stadium
Ma 24 Alta Loma Hi h School Class of 2011 Graduation E icenter Stadium
May 25 Rancho Cucamonga High
School Class of 2011 Graduation Epicenter Stadium
Ma 29 Quakes non-rental Youth Baseball Clinic E icenter Stadium
June 4 Quakes non-rental Scout Slee Over Sorts Fields
June 18 Oko e S orts Foundation Youth S orts Clinic Sorts Fields
August 19-
21 Chamber of Commerce Grape Harvest Festival Special Event Area
Se~tember
17 City of Rancho
Cucamon anon-rental Employee Family Picnic Pavilion
Park and Recreation Commission:
• The Park and Recreation Commission met on Thursday, March 17, 2011. The following items
were agenized to be discussed at this meeting:
- Review of City Council Updates.
- Approval of Consent Calendar: Minutes of the February 17, 2011 Commission Meeting,
Update and Establishment of Future Agenda Items for the Senior Advisory Committee and
the Sports Advisory Committee.
- Presentation on the Healthy RC Program.
- Commissioner update on attendance at the 2011 California and Pacific Southwest
Recreation and Park Training Conference held March 8-12, 2011, in Sacramento, California.
- Commission Subcommittee Reports: Trails Advisory, Sports Advisory. Senior Advisory and
Armed ForcesNeterans Reflection Area.
Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation:
- The Board held afull-day Vision Alignment Workshop on Wednesday, March 30, 2011, at
the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center.
P-160
RECEIVE THE COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE
APRIL 20, 2011
PAGE 12
- The Foundation's Giving Committee will meet on Wednesday, April 13'" prior to the full
Board meeting to finalize a recommendation to the Board on a student scholarship and
school sponsorship program.
- The next Board meeting of the Foundation will be held on Wednesday, April 13'".
Respectfully submitted,
~~
Kevin McArdle
Community Services Director
I:ICOMMSERVICOUncil&BOardslCityCounctRStaRReports1201 ?ICSDUpdate.9.20.1?.doc
STAFF REPORT
P-161
PUALIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT
~~
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 (aUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: Michael Maston, Assistant Engineer
Subject: APPROVAL OF A SINGLE SOURCE VENDOR SELECTION WITH T.D. GROGAN
CONSTRUCTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF RESILIENT
PLAYGROUND SURFACING AT CENTRAL PARK TOT LOT, ACCOUNT NUMBER 1120305-
555011805120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND) FOR $36,772.83 (QUOTE OF $33,428.63
PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY OF $3,343), AND THE REPAIR OF PLAYGROUND RESILIENT
SURFACE3 AT VARIOUS OTHER PARK LOCATIONS, ACCOUNT NUMBER 1120305-
565011784120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND) FOR $112,680.45 (QUOTE OF $102,438.45
PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY OF $10,244); AND AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION OF
$6,773 FROM ACCOUNT 1120305565011764120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND) TO
ACCOUNT 11203055850/1805120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve single source vendor selection with T.D. Grogan
Construction of Rancho Cucamonga, for the installation of resilient playground surfacing at Centre) Park Tot
Lot, account number 1120305-5650/1605120-0 (Park Development Fund) for $36,772.83 (quote of
$33,429.83 plus a 10°h contingency of $3,343), and the repair of playground resilient surteces at various
other park Locations, account number 1120305-5650/1764120-0 (Park Development Fund) for $112,660.45
(quote of $102,436.45 plus 10°h contingency of $10,244); and authorize the appropriation of $6,773 from
account 1120305-565011764120-0 (Park Development Furxl) to account 1120305-5650/1605120-0 (Park
Deveopment Fund).
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
The City utilizes playground rubberized resilient surfacing at several park playgrounds throughout the City.
Currently, the Clty has standardized on a product manufactured by Surtace America. Due to normal wear
and tear, there are areas that are in need of repair. The Playground Resilient Surfacing Project will repair the
playground surfaces at several parks throughout the City by removing wom and aged areas and replacing
them with new rubberized material. The length of time at each park will vary depending on [he scope of work.
Staff anticipates a minor impact to the public in that some areas of the playground may be restricted or closed
while work is being completed.
The Central Park Tot Lot Project will replace the sand area with a resilient playground surface. The project is
expected to last approximately two weeks. There will be minor Impact for the public in that the playground will
be closed until work is completed.
Surtace America has identified T.D. Grogan as the only certified installer of their playground material in
Southern California. Contracting with T.D. Grogan will allow the City to maintain consistent playground
surfaces throughout exlsUng parks for future repairs and maintenance, and maintain the manufacturer
warranty.
,Re a ully me
William Wfttko f
P
Public Works Services Director
W W:mm
STAFF REPORT
RANCHO CUC:LM1fONGA POLICE DEYAR"1'b~tENT
DATE: April 20, 2011
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
FROM: Joe Cusimano, Police Chief
BY: Glenn Grabiec, Lieutenant
Steve Wolff, Detective ~'
P-162
a
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $57,168.00 TO EXPEND HOMELAND SECURITY
GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE
DEPARTMENT INTO THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNT NUMBERS: 1381701-5200
(OPERATIONS 8 MAINTENANCE) $5,336.00; 1381701-5215 (08M/COMPUTER
EQUIPMENT) $24,258.00; AND 1381701-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER
EQUIPMENT) $27,574.00.
Staff recommends that the City Council approve an appropriation of $57,268.00 to expend
Homeland Security Grant funds awarded to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department into the
following account numbers: 1381701-5200 (Operations 8 Maintenance) $5,336.00; 1381701-5215
(08M/Computer Equipment) $24,258.00; and 1381701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment)
$27,574.00.
BACKGROUND
Each year, the Department of Homeland Security provides federal funding for local govemment
agencies engaged in approved projects designated to improve the level of the nation's overall
readiness and security. This funding is in the form of grants awarded to each state and then
distributed by the state to local governments. The amount of the grant varies from year to year and
is calculated on a variety of different factors including but not limited to population, number of
agencies and the amount of funds available.
Local govemment agencies then submit an application to the state describing the projects for which
they are seeking funding. For the State of California, the Office of Emergency Services administers
all functions of the Homeland Security Grant Program. Once an application is approved, the
agency can submit invoices for reimbursement from the state. In March of 2011, the Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department received approval for their FY 2009 Homeland Security Grant
Application in the amount of $57,168.00.
The following list is brief description of each approved project and the amount of funding applied to
that project from the grant.
P-163
APPAOVAI..'f0 APPROPRIATE $57,168.00'IYJ EXPEND HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNllS PAGE 2
AWARDED 'f0'fHE IL1NCtlO CUCAMONGA POLICE"• DEPAR'CD4EN'1' INTO THE bY)LYOWING ACCOUNT
NUMBExS: 1381701-5200 (OPERAT'IONS & MAINTENANCE) $5,336.00;1381701-5215
(O&M/COMPUTER EQUIP!bSF,N'f) $24,2
APRIL 30, 3071
DVD Authoring Server $10,674.00
This is an automated DVD/CD burning device designed to automatically load blank disk
into a drive, burn the data to the disk and then unload the completed disk to a storage
bin. The device will be used in the Police Department's Electronic Forensic Lab to
archive digital evidence associated with criminal investigations. The device will be
placed either on the labs own private network or the Sheriffs network but will not
connect to the City network.
Data Back-Up For Electronic Forensic Lab $3,080.00
This is a network attached storage (NAS) device to be installed on the Police
Department's Electronic Forensic Lab's private network. This will add a layer of
redundant storage to an existing NAS device already in place. This will provide back-up
data storage for digital evidence associated with criminal investigations.
Data Back-Up For DIRAS Server $3,148.00
This is an additional network attached storage (NAS) device to be installed on the
Sheriff's network to provide additional layers of redundant storage for the Digital Imaging
Management System's (DIMS) Server. The DIMS Server houses the majority of our
digital still video and audio evidence associated with criminal investigations.
Laptop Computers $10,000.00
This will provide up to five (5) laptop computers that will be assigned to the Police
Department's Detective Bureau. The laptop computers will purchased through the
Sheriff's Department Technical Services Division and will be configured with all
necessary hardware and software to make them compatible with the Sheriff's network.
GPS Tracker Devices $1,269.00
These are small battery operated devices designed to be rapidly deployed on vehicles
for the purpose of monitoring activity. These devices are used by the Police Department
as surveillance aids.
Fiber-Optic Inspection Scopes $1,048.00
Up to five (5) portable scopes with afiber-optic flexible lens designed to inspect confined
spaces and crevasses where contraband may be hidden. The flexible lens allows the
device to see into places that are beyond the reach of the human eye. This will be
assigned to the Police Department's Detective Bureau for use on search warrants or
other criminal investigations.
Cell Phone Examination System $8,030.00
This combination hardware and software solution is used to examine and recover data
from cell phones and other portable electronic equipment. It utilizes forensically sound
procedures to accurately retrieve, document and analyze data associated with this type
of device. The equipment will be assigned to the Police Departments Electronic
Forensic Lab.
P-164
t1rPROVAL TO APPROPRInTI $57,168.00 "i'O EXPEND HOMELAND SL'CURl"IY GRANT FUNDS PAGE 3
AW'.ARDED TO TI-IE RANCHO CUCADIONGA POLICH DEPARTMENT INTO'1'I-IE FOLLOWING :\CCOUNT
NtiMtiExs: 1381701-5200 (OPERATIONS & MAWTENANCF) $5,336.00;1351701-5215
(O~b1~COMPU'1'ER FQUI Rb1F:NT) $2d,2
A PR 11.20, 201 ]
Audio Filtering and Analysis System
$16,900.00
This combination hardware and software solution is designed to enhance the detail of
audio evidence. It consists of multiple layers of adjustable filters and algorithms which
are used to identify signal noise or distortion that interferes with the clear listening of
audio evidence. Once the noise is identified it can be masked or removed from the
audio stream rendering 1 clear and intelligible. This equipment will be installed in the
Police Department's Electronic Forensic Lab.
Digital Still Camera Kits
Up to three (3) digital cameras will be purchased
Department's Detective Bureau designated for field use.
of lenses, battery packs and media storage for digital
investigations.
$3,019.00
and assigned to the Police
Each kit will consist of a variety
photos associated with criminal
Total Amount of Grant Funding
P-165
STAFF REPORT l ' ~`
;~
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEP,9RT~rENT
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager/Deputy City Manager Administrative Servi -C%
By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buye
Subject: APPROVE AN EXTENSION TO RACT NUMBER OB-158 TO AEF SYSTEMS
(AEF), TO IMPLEMENT PHASE TWO OF THE CITY'S INTRANET PROJECT AND TO
COMPLETE THE CITIZEN RESPONSE MANAGEMENT (CRM) SYSTEM;
AUTHORIZE AN EXPENDITURE INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF $73,500, WHICH
WILL INCREASE THE TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT TO $232,294; AND APPROVE
AN APPROPRIATION INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 1714001-5300 (COMPUTER
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND) IN THE AMOUNT OF $73 500
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council approve an extension to Contract Number 08-158 to AEF
Systems (AEF), to implement phase two of the City's Intranet project and to complete the Citizen
Response Management (CRM) System; and Authorize an expenditure increase in the amount of
$73,500, which will increase the total contract amount to $232,294; and approve an appropriation
into account number 1714001-5300 (Computer Technology Replacement Fund) in the amount of
$73,500.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
AEF Systems is currently providing professional software implementation and project management
services for the website redesign project. With AEF's assistance, the implementation of the City's
public Intemet site has been completed on-budget. The City is now beginning the implementation
phase of the Intranet site and completing the final phases of the Citizen Response Management
(CRM) system, including full community development implementation.
The initial phases of the Internet site and the CRM exposed multiple unforeseen challenges which
extended the timeline of completion for both projects. The City's public website redesign has since
been completed and launched as of November 2010. Several initial departments have completed
their CRM creation and have since gone live as of March 2011. The remaining departments to
finalize the project will require extensive planning and implementation assistance due to their
inherent complexities and business process, which must be well managed in order to have an
effective CRM system. The anticipated completion date for both the Intranet and CRM system is
July 2011.
As a result of the additional project scope, the contract amount initially awarded to AEF was
insufficient to complete the two additional projects. AEF was asked to submit a proposal to
continue project management services and oversight to see the two projects through to successful
completion. An additional $73,500 is being requested to finish the projects. City Staff has reviewed
the proposal and has determined the scope of work, timeline, and professional fees to be
reasonable and in the City's best interest to approve each proposal as stated. The proposals for
each project are attached for review.
P-166
December 13, 2010
Ms. Keri Hinojos
Acting Purchasing Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729.
Dear Keri:
This letter is to document AEF's role in providing oversight services to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga in the implementation of Phase II of the new Customer
Relationship Management System (CRM). This proposal briefly describes our
approach to meeting this request.
Scope
The City has just completed the rollout of a new CRM (Rancho Responds) which
is being utilized by four departments -Public Works, City Clerk, Gty Manager
's Office and Library. The rollout has gone well and we are in the final stages of
fine-tuning the workflows for these depaztments. In January, Phase II will begin
to complete the remaining departments. At the time of this proposal, AEF has
approximately 80 hours left on their existing contract to help assist in the rollout
of these departments. This should allow AEF to continue in its role of overall
project manager and oversight provider to the project
Also included in the Phase R implementation project is the rollout of the Code
Enforcement module. You have has asked AEF to participate in an oversight role
over the implementation of Code Enforcement for the City. In support of this
work, AEF would perform the following activities:
• Review of the vendor contract to ensure all aspects meet the desired needs of
the City
• Development of an overall project plan, in concert with Civica
• Management of key project activities to ensure both the vendor as well as
City staff are performing required activities
• Development of the baseline documents for each department on the 50+
service requests for review by all departments involved
• Validation of the core requirements of the Building & Safety department
relating to Code Enforcement processes
• Pazticipation in requirements' meetings with departments as needed
P-167
2
• Participafion in Core Team meetings throughout the project
• Review and resolution of key issues that might arise throughout the project
• Testing of all processes plus Code Enforcement system as necessary
• Communication with the core management team to review issues and project
status
• Participation in the rollout to the public (if desired) of the new Code
Enforcement system
Professional Fees and Timing
The overall project timing is expected to start in January and be completed by
July 2011. AEF anticipates involvement in this project will require on average
approximately 10 hours per week project to accomplish the tasks defined
resulting in a professional fee of $31,500.
The City will only be billed for the actual hours incurred during the course of the
work and will not be billed for any more than $31,500 without express
permission from the City. AEF will bill monthly for the hours incurred during
that period. No expenses are anticipated during the course of the project.
~~~~•~
AEF appreciates the opportunity to provide continued service to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga. Please contact meat (714) 974-4377 to discuss any aspect of
this proposal.
Sincerely,
~.~~~ L -
Annette E. Feliciani
Cc John Gillison
P-168
December 13, 2010
Ms. Keri I-Iinojos
Acting Purchasing Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729
Deaz Keri:
This letter is to document AEF's role in providing oversight services to the City
of Rancho Cucamonga in the implementation of Phase R of the website -
specifically die City's Intranet. This proposal briefly describes our approach to
meeting this request.
Scope
The City has just completed a complete redesign of its website and the rollout of
this website to the public and staff. You have asked AEF to continue in a project
management/oversight role over this new phase of activity. In support of this
work, AEF would perform the following activities:
• Development of an overall project plan, in concert with Civica
• Management of key project activities to ensure both the vendor as well as
City staff are performing required activities
• Review of all key deliverables
• Participation in key design meetings
^ Participation in Core Team meetings throughout the project
• Review and resolution of key issues that might arise throughout the project
• Communication with John Gillison to review issues and project status as well
as any communication required to the Executive Management team and/or
City Council.
Professional Fees and Timing
The overall project timing is expected to start in January and be ready for rollout
July 1, 20].1. AEF anticipates involvement in this project will require on average
approximately 10 hours per week for the 24week project to accomplish the tasks
defined resulting in a professional fee of $42,000.
P-169
As always, the City will only be billed for the actual hours incurred during the
course of the work and will not be billed for any more than $42,000 without
express permission Erom the City. AEF will bill monthly for the hours incun•ed
during that period. No expenses are anticipated during the course of the project.
~~xx+~
AEF appreciates the opportunity to provide continued service'to the Caty of
Rancho Cucamonga. Please contact me at (714) 974-4377 to discuss any aspect of
this proposal.
Sincerely,
Annette E. Feliciani
Cc John Gillison
P-170
STAFF REPORT _ ~r~~~~J
13KCi1Nlil il2lt~G $E12VR:1?S Dlst'i\R'rh115V'I' ~~_)~.J.,
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer ~')7`fl.
Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer~,~-t .
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION
OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $341,000.00, TO THE LOWEST
RESPONSIVE BIDDER, ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT, AND AUTHORIZE THE
EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $34,100.00, FOR
THE ARROW ROUTE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM ROCHESTER AVENUE
TO JUNEBERRY DRIVE TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I FUNDS, ACCOUNT
NO. 1176303-5650/1768176-0 AND APPROPRIATE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF
$89,500.00 TO ACCOUNT NO. 1176303-5650/1768176-0 FROM MEASURE I FUND
BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the
execution of the contract in the amount of $341,000.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, All
American Asphalt, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of
$34,100.00, for the Arrow Route Pavement Rehabilitation from Rochester Avenue to Juneberry
Drive to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 1176303-5650/1768176-0 and appropriate
an additional amount of $89,500.00 to Account No. 1176303-5650/1768176-0 from Measure I fund
balance.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 5, 2011, for the
subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $380,246.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and
found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be
inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest
responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents.
The scope of work consists of pavement grinding, routing and crack seal, asphalt concrete
pavement, asphalt rubber overlay, re-striping and pavement markings and re-installation of
inductive loops, and it is estimated that approximately five jobs will be generated in connection with
this project. The contract documents call for forty-five (45) working days to complete this
construction.
Respectfully submitted,
,,, t2.uer"
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MAS/RMD/SH Is
Attachments
P-171
#'~;
z z
U ~ r ~a=.
I '~'~
'~ W I-=
~iJ 0 U
'~'pv, W J
~I r -nv s":~ p
I m d ~'
113 ~ I Z H A
s, ~ I ~ o ~ ~
/~-~~7 ~j LL 0.i
L~J N rL ~y
\ ~I an"78 ~N3 ~1.V0 ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~
I Q ~ ~ W
A NYJ AK ~
o a 3nv s3HOOal~
S IQ ~~
_J ~ ~ ° ~ ~°
I 3n N3NI~ I ~ o ~ f- z ~ w
N O y
~ ° o ca ~ G4
~.~ m ~ I ~ a
s ~
~ _ ~~
a ~ ~ ~ 3nV 3nVHl O
N ~ v vS a3H ~ U ~ ~
to J~fl~=~^ ~ ~~~
n 3nv welH av ~ ~ o
rLJI ~ I ~ ~
I ~~ m z_ v NV T13H
'J nv QaV.l3Nl
~' II I l.la B ~'
I u u ~ ~ V 42i NI
J (n
_ I NvnaNav - m -
`I J
Ls Sal dvs ;~ \V, c
G~ ° 3nv 3noao
L. , _ Q~~0
v
d
O x
C ~.
M c
C o
O c
O o
M x
r
O G
C N
V. o
O 0
G
~
C
F o
o .c
o~ ~0
c 0
a o
r c
o ~
~-' vi
~r o
c o
G c
~c c
G
in ^
a
c
,.
, ~ ~ o o ~ ~ r o ~ o t rn,
L ~ ~ r{y til ~ ift J1 a9
~
a.. C
M ~
x
ei~ O
O 7
N N C
O O
O O
O N
x r
ct O
C C
b N
7 O
O
~ Z O 00 54 d3 ~ ;fr M ffl d3 Q 0M
~% ~
' ti
t~s
~ ~ V N x s3 ,~ ^
c~i ir, +~
G
O C
O ~i
N O
O O
G C
C O
u7 C
O O
."~ O
O G
C O
O
Li
p
F Ol M
~, ~n
in N
r O
~~ ~-+
r O
~ ~ O x ~ ~ ~
V
O
~ r
r-i ST
00
t}} r
x
~ Q
~ f7
N
f{} x
N
f13 M
x
M ~O
N
rt M
'~
V3 7
N
5/3
x
iR r
~ M
~O
M
id ~ (~ N
~ to ~
.
N Q
O r ....... . .. ... .... .... .... . ...._. .. ....__ _.__ ._.._._.. ._......._.. ... _.__... ....__... ...__.__, _,...___ ....__...__.. ._ __.._ _. _._..... _...._...._
fJ c
o o ~ 0
O 0
O o
c U:
N o
n o
O c
o ^
c o
o
O ¢. C ~ O O ~ N O O C C M
f
f/i ft
54
C
V; O
~ O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O C
O O
O O
G O
G O
O O
O
w r.+
FI ~A
~ N
~ M
o O
o ~n
~* d
o N
rr N
r O
o O
•r O
o O
o
' O
n
p
'p
A ~ a~
ui C
r O
~ri y'
~ 'S,,
..• r
vi ~
ai r
v O
o? O
N C
o A O
~
~ ~
~
rA~
tit
U?
b9
~
~
~
LS
~
~ ~
M
~
O q
Ld
ti u
.w
_..
_--...--
--......_
..------
-~----..
W
~ w
d ..___ __._...
o
~+:
V _._..----
in
N -~---.. _.
O
O ___.___
O
O ....__..-
O
O ------
O
O --...._......
^
O ._--._.
C
O
x ._._......
O
O
C O
O
h O
C
O O
O
O
~
4 ~ Z O :
W ~ tf3 O
O
' ~
~ O
OM
~ b
~ br4 o N
Vi o
O 000
d3
~ ~ U ~ y
- C.
N
N3 ~
~'
W O
o O
O O
C O
O C
C O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
o O
O
H
`
Qi'
F
~., G
C
q cf
00
N fv
p O
O
q O
C O
O
.p O
M
M O
N
O~ O
O
O O
G
C O
O
O O
O
O ~
7
tY
W
„y P
O O _ O .-i
~ ~ r
~ ~D to O ~t
ifr ~
!fl N
f!3 O
M
(~ 'A (!j to 6? N
~ FiT 'J3 ~
w
rn _...
W o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o 0
c 0
c 0
o 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
w
(. F
V1 o
o
O ci
ift v
iR o
O 0
o
M o
o
~ v;
x
d3 0
x
+/t 0
0
O 0
0
~ 0
0
O 0
0
O
~a~ ~ i
fi
z
w
.° ~ o ~ ~
a~ N °~
~ ,a a~
O U n
O ~C O- ~
~ a
.-i 6>
~ 4=
O 7
Q. ~ N
m
O '~-'
N ~ N
C6
fV U
y ro _C
Y
V) . J O U O N
N „
,
a+ ~ `~
- 'p
C Q ~
A N .
Cr C
F
N t0
>
~ ~
C
N
O
-UC
~ p
=
a>
>
~ ~ II
~ ~
E >
Q
,
,
r. ~ F+ ~ ~o N m p
c c v > a
Pr ~ ice' O) O O K N X Oi C
g O O ~ 01
p ;..~ -'~
s. c
~ ~ m
~ °
~ o
a c
:~ -
m .~
° y o
~ G
'a
' 'y
A~~ ~ o co
a
m ~ o =
N m
a ~ ~ N ~ a
y
q ~ C
O
~
~
o
~
>
O
A O
~ o
«O.
O
~
O) Q
7L
O N 7 C Ol
~ G O7 V
L O 0)
(4 C
O Q
O U `-' L C
O ~ C .C
~ N
C
~.+
r
h
~
m ~°
c ~ C
m
g
~
3
E
-~
"
N
4
U
~
'gin
'
.1' c
i
Q ~
~
~ .n ~
~ ~
-° N
~ ~
> in
> E
~
a ~ m
~ v
m ~
~ v n
~ ~ -
~ ?~ a CJ m v ai ¢ ¢ Q Q 3 ~' o r ~ r 8
~
U a
~ cn cn
~
J ee((
LL1
Q
~
, Z
~ (n fn W W W O
r O
r W
+
,
~~ r N M N r
~ O~ M V r O7 ~ N
d ~ O O ~
O
i., ~ to CV
L
Q x .-~ N M ~h Lf1 '.L l~ 00 G1 O ~ N
P-172
a
0 0
o 0
c o
c c
o 4
~ 0
o 0
c 0
c 0
o 4 co ~
~
C
F h
p m
cc ~
c c
N ~ a
~~ :>i
N o
c c
4 o
N
v7
a
N o
c
a of
o0
z ~ N o v; .. ti a h ~
Rf
w yQ O N
ff3 ~
r
en v; ~ :n
N ~
~ :t; ~ ~ v? M
p
~
vr ~
~ O
y ~~ ~C
C O
O O
O O
O c
O O
O O
O o
O O
C O
C ^
~ O
O
V F '~
~, N
as N
n O
~ in
~.t •-:
,~ T
co 1/)
a7 O
o 117 G O
c
~ ~ O ss s~
V M
fy 7ft f9 d3
S~
O
O ~
O~ N
O O
O C
O O
C C O
G O
O O
O O
O O
O ~
O~
F O
O 1~
r O O
o O
v N
d- ~ W
rn O
o C
c O
:o O
M In
1n
z v, ~ ~ v7 c 4 ~ 1n v, o N o
Q y ~ G
~ ,~
~= m ~ +~ ~ ~
~' m
N v
~ ~
`~ ~
fP c
~
~ o~
~
a
., ~ fs fR va
~y U
'O C) w
4."
p O
C h
l1% v
M o
G O
O O
O
O O
O O
O O
G O
O O
O
~
w r'
MI v
1F
~ O
C
ffr M
fR O
In C
N 'A •-'
~ h
h O
O O
C O
~O N
y
~
P U T N
~'. fR M
~ U} dR IA
~ M
~ O
o 1U
fR
~ `~ [fit
G
~ o
C o
O C
O O
O O
O O
O o
O O
O O
O o
O I O
O o
W
H O~
n N
d' '~J
O O
O O
M O
tT S.
N D
~ O
~ O
~ C
n I C M
M
x ;~ o o c .: 1n C
U
t~ (Q rfi N3 &.+ ff. N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M
C ~+
a Z~l {A ~ EA
~+
C O
(b O
O G
O O
O O
O O
O O
~ O O
O O
O O
O O ~
O O
O
U
v E,
rp
O o+
h
~:
f~ N
~ o
0
an 0
1n
~ o
u)
~ h
m
~ 1n
ao
s4 o
a
0 ~
1c
~ o
o
~ c
0
.~ "' U .'.' :9 r
~
a ~'
O
O c;-
o0 C
O O
O O
O O
O ^
O O
C O
O C
O O
O O
C V
W
F O
o
f1; L7
h
V; i0
o
O C
o
M ~
N
1A v7
oc
O O
M
M N
v
~ N
N
N. O
m
O O
c^
N O
v7
C O~
v
?
p
V Q~
~ ~~ 00
EH O
~ ~ M
iA ~
Ff} iD
~
N ti
~7
64 N
&9 N
eft O
b"r' ^,
di O
M
~ ~ ~.
G1
~
~
O
.._
......_.___
......_......
.__............
....... _...
....-.._.. _..
Z ..... ..- --..__ ....
O
o ...........
N
v: ...---..._.._
O
c ._.......__
O
o _..__~--
O
0 -------.
O
0 .__.._._........-'-
O
0 ----.
O
0 O
0 O
0 4
0 O
0
"')
~j
F o
O ~
Vt ~i
ffl o
N ~n
h >-~
~
M Iri
GA
Cfl M
o~
69 Iri
N
N c
t0
N o
M
N vi
N
IA
W ~ f!1
~ 1n a+} rf3 ~ ,V fR ~ f!t
U ~ +~
fR
~ c
.
°- d
~
o
~
O
N
~
m ~
¢
F
d -
o an
•~ m
~ ~
n
a~ o a ~ m
o +-~
N ~ vi
m
m ~
~ ~ c
-~
~ ~
o
~
~ ~ m
E
~ ~ ~ ~~ y
~ m
N ro c N
c m
~
w i
a
~ ~
>
~ a ~
o a
i
E >
n
1..f C L. U y
~ In ~ C C U > ~
W O A S ~ 1O °' .~' X~ a a m ro
G~~
(~ a'' f m ~ o
~ 0 0
~ ~ ~° c
m m
~ o
~ ~
a w
y
.. r~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ,D ~ N N ~ .Y °' ~ .U N U
x ,~
x a .~ ` o .., o ~ m Q
t:.
~ ro c w m m ~- c a o m ro
~
Q~
~ C~
~
6 °-
-o ~
~D N
c N
~ in
c ro Y E
c w m " ca
° ~ a
E
w
~ ~ .
°~ c o S ~ a ~v w c~ ~ ro °~ m
o c
g U ro v ~ ¢ Q Q Q 3 .... o r f r o
~, ~
~
~ Q ~ N
J
W
J
W
~~ a to fn trt W W O O
C1 ~i r- N
~ M
O N h•
~ m o0
~ V
l7 '- N .-- N
~
C
i.f tf7 ~ N
P-173
LV
:11
P-174
STAFF REPORT
1',DMINIb'TR~ITIVE SERVICES DEP.~ItT'\g'.NT'
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: John Gillison, Assistant City Manage
By: Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Manager
Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manager
Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer-
Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) DELL POWEREDGE R810
COMPUTER SERVERS INCLUDING APPLICABLE MAINTENANCE, AND
MICROSOFT SOFTWARE TO SIGMANET, INC., OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, IN
THE AMOUNT OF $70,192, TO BE FUNDED FROM THE FOLLOWING ACCOUNTS:
$5,820 FROM 1714001-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE), $50 FROM 1714001-5300
(CONTRACT SERVICES), $8,810 FROM 1714001-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), $9,083 FROM 2624801-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE),
$26,429 FROM 2624801-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT), AND
THE FOLLOWING COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT ACCOUNTS: $4,181
FROM 1373701-5152 (COMPUTER SOFTWARE), $30 FROM 1373701-5300
(CONTRACT SERVICES), AND $15,789 FROM 1373701-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-
COMPUTER) COPS SECURE OUR SCHOOLS GRANT.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the award of the purchase of Two (2) Dell PowerEdge Computer Servers including
applicable maintenance, and Microsoft software to Sigmanet, Inc., of Ontario, California, in the
amount of $70,192, to be funded from the following accounts: $5;820 from 1714001-5152
(Computer Software), $50 from 1714001-5300 (Contract Services), $8,810 from 1714001-5605
(Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment), $9,083 from 2624801-5152 (Computer Software), $26,429
from 2624801-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment), and the following Cops Secure Our
Schools Grant Accounts: $4,181 from 1373701-5152 (Computer Software), $30 from 1373701-
5300 (Contract Services), and $15,789 from 1373701-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer).
BACKGROUND
The Information Services and GIS Divisions collaboratively support the City's GIS services. Based
on a lifecycle strategy, the replacement of hardware and software pertaining to a core GIS server is
necessary. Additionally, new services are being implemented that require addition of another GIS
server hardware and related software. The Information Services and GIS Divisions provided
specifications to the Purchasing Department for review and io determine the most advantageous
method of procurement.
The Purchasing Division prepared and posted to the City's automated procurement system, a
formal Request for Bid, (RFB) # 10/11-013. There were thirteen (13) notified bidders, twelve (12)
P-175
APRIL 20.2011
prospective bidders downloaded the bid package, and one (1) bid response was received. After
analysis of the bid response by Purchasing, Information Services, and GIS Staff it has been
determined to be in the City's best interest to award the purchase of Two (2) Dell PowerEdge
Computer Servers including applicable Maintenance, and Microsoft Software to Sigmanet, inc., of
Ontario, California, the most responsive, responsible bidder that meets the specifications required
by the Information Services and GIS Divisions, in the amount of $70,192. All applicable Bid
documentation is on file in the City's electronic Procurement System and can be located through
the City's Internet.
P-176
STAFF REPORT -
PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: Emest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent
Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A
CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT $87,000 TO THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER, SCORPION
BACKHOE INC. OF HEMET, CALIFORNIA TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER
1122303-5650/1778122-0 (SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE) IN THE AMOUNT OF $49,170
(INCLUDES BID AMOUNT OF $44,700 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY OF $4,470) AND FUNDED
FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER 2660801-5607 (2004 7AX ALLOCATION BONDS) IN THE AMOUNT
OF $37,830 (INCLUDES BID AMOUNT OF $34,390 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY OF $3,440)
FOR THE STORM DRAIN LIFT STATION MAINTENANCE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE
APPROPRIATION OF $14,170 FUND 122 (SOUTH ETIWANDA DRAINAGE) FUND BALANCE
AND $7,830 FROM FUND 660 (2004 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS) FUND BALANCE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a
contrail in the amount $87,000 to the apparent low bidder, Scorpion Backhoe Inc. of Hemet, California to be
funded from account number 1122303-5650!1778122-0 (South Etiwanda Drainage) in the amount of $49,170
(includes bid amount of $44,700 plus 10% contingency of $4,470} and funded from account number 2660801-
5607 (2004 Tax Allocation Bonds) in the amount of $37,830 (includes bid amount of $34,390 plus 10%
contingency of $3,440) for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project and authorize the appropriation of
$14,170 Fund 122 (South Etiwanda Drainage) fund balance and $7,830 from fund 860 (2004 Tax Allocation
Bonds) fund balance.
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
The City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the City Clerk to advertise the Notice
Inviting Bids for the Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance at the regular Council meeting on January 19, 2011.
The Storm Drain Lift Station Maintenance Project consists of replacement of submersible pumps in catch
basins which have reached the end of their service life. Modifications to the discharge lines and the installation
of debris racks are included in the project to enhance the performance of the storm drain lift station. The work
scheduled for this project will be conducted on Archibald Avenue south of Devon Street and on Etiwanda
Avenue south of Arow Route.
The project is scheduled to be completed within 10 working days.
Respe Ily su fitted,
William Wittkopf
Public Works Services Director
BW;ER/mm
P-177
°0 8 $ °a $
s ~ ~ ~ m ~ 6
A
Q
N N N N
y
°' o ° ° °
o o o
t
~ °o ° °m
9 s p
I
Y ~ N p
N
S o $ $ 8
~ m s s ~
s
'
g
~
~ ~
°°
O $ 8 S
i CS S4 < N
O V p
V ~ N
N
M g ° ° ° d
9
L
88$ ~ O
O O
O N
N O
m p
y
j
y
N
M
N ee
w
V
v '9
_
°o _
°m
°o
$
~ ~
~ ~ pO O N N
C {
~
Yl (+
N N
°; S o $ 8
~
N ~ ~ ~
O
L~ ~ _
N
y~
N
`
N {yam
y~
y
.SR __~
O .._..._.~ ............. ~ ......
~ ~E
N ~ ~
n s nw
N N
00 ~ ~ g 8
y {1 ~ 1 !
~
y t7
m ~ N H
8
---
C
U ~ t ~ ~ N {
8 y ~
~
a V
k
E ~ ~
a n &
F ~
y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~z " ~a ~Q g ~~
C~ ~ Z
~ $
C
g ~ m a~
go ~# u N
aa
~
aC~ `
S 5
Sa L
~w
~'~ d,
~c~,
D
S
R S
~
~
J
J
~
o
~
N g
',
°
$ o
~
r
<
m
O
N
E
8
n
c
0
c
m
3
S
1
~
~ 8 ~ ~
O
° ~
~ m
mm a
h
N n
M
-~ N N
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0
m p
O N p
17
wy N
p
O
O
S
O pp
R
~ N ~' e
w 7G
--- S O S O
•t rl
C 8 p
N p ~
" S
~
f
~ ~ ~
N N
o $ g g 8
~ pp
O
i 8
O
S p
O
m
In y
~
ID
W N
r O O O O
~ ~
N
~ o
O
S
= W W U b F
rc O > >
E ~
< a
~ m n
Y
N ~ "
~ ~
aQ
o¢ °
a ~
4
o-',
E ;
~ ~g Y
~ y
~
Ap
C ~ $
~ p
~
~ m
~
CG
m Sw A
G
Y
r
J
y
J
S C
o
m ~
N
N
P
STAFF REPORT
t1llM1NISTRd"1'IVE SERVICES DEPdRTIv1ENT
Date: April 20, 2011
70: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: John R. Gillison, Assistant City Manager ,
By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director
Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCH
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP FOR FISCAL YEA
P-178
~ ~.r- ~~;
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
A MEMORANDUM OF
O CUCAMONGA AND THE
R 2011-12
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached Resolution, approving the Memorandum
of Understanding between the Executive Management Group and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga for the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012.
BACKGROUND
Staff and the City's Executive Management Employees have met and confen'ed in good faith
and reached an agreement for a one (1) year labor contract for the period July 1, 2011 through
June 30, 2012. The new MOU includes provisions for implementing a second retirement tier for
new employees which will reduce the city's long term pension costs. The attached
Memorandum of Understanding implements the negotiated provisions. In recognition of the
current economic conditions in the State of California, and the ongoing fiscal challenges facing
all local agencies, this memorandum also includes certain wage and benefit concessions
designed to reduce the City's labor costs.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving 2011-12 Executive Management Group MOU
2. 2011-12 Executive Management Group MOU
P-179
RESOLUTION NO. 11- X5"7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP
RELATIVE TO WAGES, BENEFITS AND OTHER TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12.
A. RECITALS
Representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Executive
Management Group have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-
Milias-Brown Act (Califomia Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to wages,
benefits and other terms and conditions of employment.
Representatives of the City and Executive Management have agreed upon and
presented to this City Council a Memorandum of Understanding effective July 1, 2011
specifying the results of said meet and confer process.
All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. RESOLUTION
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
hereby find, determine and resolve as follows:
In all respects, as set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution.
The attached Memorandum of Understanding entered into by and between City
representatives and the Executive Management Group representatives for Fiscal
Year 2011-12 effective July 1, 2011 is hereby approved and ratified by the City
Council.
3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2011.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAINED:
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice Reynolds, City Clerk
P-180
I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of , 2011.
Executed this day of 2011 at Rancho Cucamonga, California.
Janice Reynolds, City Clerk
P-181
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
AND
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP
SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE
The provisions of this MOU are effective July 1, 2011 and shall continue for a one year
period ending June 30, 2012.
SECTION 2: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT
There shall be no cost of living adjustment (0%) for the term of this agreement, except
as may be provided to any other City or Fire District bargaining units.
SECTION 3: SALARY STRUCTURE
Executive Management employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less
than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 15% (30
salary code steps) above the control point.' Actual salary within the range is determined
by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments,
growth within the position,
SECTION 4 : EXECUTIVE BENEFITS
Employees designated as Executive Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or
compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule.
Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees
and the following:
A. Administrative Leave -One hundred (100) hours per fiscal year. Days off must
be approved by appropriate supervisor, after successful completion of six months
services within this classification.
B. Life Insurance -Life insurance in the amount of 100% of the annual base salary
plus 575,000.
C. Deferred Compensation -Six percent (6%) of base salary. Additional voluntary
individual contributions above the 6% of base salary level will be matched dollar
for dollar by the City up to a limit of 2% of base salary. The total contributions for
both City and Employee cannot exceed the maximum annual contributions as
determined by the Internal Revenue Service.
D. Automotive allowance of 5500 per month if a City vehicle is not provided
P-182
E. Executive Wellness Plan -The City shall provide reimbursement for employee
for an Executive Physical, and related approved expenses, up to a maximum
amount of $2,000 per fiscal year. If the employee selects or requires additional
services beyond the $2,000 per fiscal year amount, employee may receive
reimbursement for additional approved expenses in an amount equivalent to any
unspent funds remaining from employee's Executive Wellness Plan from the
prior fiscal year. If no unspent funds remain from employee's Executive
Wellness Plan from the prior fiscal year, employee may receive reimbursement
for additional approved expenses as an advance against employee's next
immediate fiscal year Executive Wellness Plan (1 year advance only). In no
event shall any employee receive more than $4,000 total reimbursement for an
Executive Physical, and related expenses, in one fiscal year. Approved
providers, and a list of eligible reimbursable services, shall be determined by the
Administrative Services Department.
SECTION 5: HEALTH INSURANCE
A. EMPLOYEES HIRED BEFORE JULY 1.1994
The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all existing full-
time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining group, subject to the
limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed the following:
$995.60 effective July 1, 2009
B. EMPLOYEES HIRED AFTER JULY 1.1994
The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all full-time
continuous employees within the bargaining groups who have been hired on or
after July 1, 1994, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the
City shall exceed the following:
$700.00 effective July 1, 2009
C. CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT
Represented employees who waive coverage under a City paid medical
insurance plan shall be eligible for a cash in-lieu payment in the amount of $200
per month for single coverage or $300 per month for family coverage. To be
eligible an employee must provide proof of other medical insurance coverage
and must provide a signed waiver.
2
P-183
SECTION 6: RETIREE MEDICAL
Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement
from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the
time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally funded without any City
contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group
health insurance available to the City's retirees and eligible dependent.
It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or
can be made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if
available, will remain available for any specific future period of time.
If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s)
terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the
City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or
replacement insurance.
All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree.
The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to
the retiree reimbursing the City not later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the
premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium
payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage.
The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree,
regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare.
City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree or eligible
dependent. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance
carrier(s).
It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates
for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates.
If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is
prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and
retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon
rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek
reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as
and for premium reimbursement.
SECTION 7: DENTAL INSURANCE
The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried
employees.
3
P-184
SECTION 8: OPTICAL INSURANCE
The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried
employees.
SECTION 9: IRS SECTION 125 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN
The City has established an IRS Section 125 Flexible Spending Account Plan managed
by a third party administrator that is open to voluntary participation by members of the
bargaining unit. The City agrees to pick up all administrative fees associated with
maintaining this program for bargaining unit members (including but not limited to debit
card fees.)
SECTION 10: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA)
The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) through the
California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist employees
vdith planning for future health care expenses. Employees are allowed a one time
election to opt into the plan.
Contributions to the Plan shall be made as City contributions through a salary reduction
arrangement. All contributions made on behalf of employees through such salary
reduction arrangement are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS provisions.
No Employer contributions are to be made to the plan. At the discretion of the
Executive Management Group, contributions may be amended once per year provided
that such amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan
Document.
SECTION 11 RETIREE HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT
The members of the Executive Management Group have unanimously agreed to
implement a Retiree Health Savings Account as follows:
A. PRE-1994 EMPLOYEES
1. All Executive Management employees hired prior to 1994 will contribute
the agreed upon value of their accumulated vacation and eligible sick
leave time to the Retiree Health Savings Account, upon separation from
the City.
2. ,Pre-1994 Employees will review the provisions of the Retiree Health
Savings Account on a yearly basis, in June of every fiscal year, and notify
the City of any changes that are desired in the contribution values of their
collective accounts on or before July 1 of the following fiscal year. Any
4
P-185
changes must be approved by a simple majority of the Pre-1994
participants, prior to implementation.
3. The Retiree Health Savings Account will be administered for 'the
participants by Nationwide Retirement Solutions and atl costs related to
the ongoing administration thereof will be borne by plan participants,
based on the fees and charges established by Nationwide Retirement
Solutions, which may change from time to time, and not the City.
B. POST-1994 EMPLOYEES
All Executive Management employees hired subsequent to 1994 will
contribute the agreed upon percent of the cash value of their accumulated
vacation and eligible sick leave time to the Retiree Health Savings
Account, upon separation from the City. !± is understood that the funds
contributed are limited to paying for qualified medical premiums.
Post-1994 Employees will review the provisions of the Retiree Health
Savings Account on a yearly basis, in June of every fiscal year, and notify
the City of any changes that are desired in the contribution values of their
collective accounts on or before July 1 of the following fiscal year, Any
changes must be approved by a simple majority of the Post-1994
participants, prior to implementation.
The Retiree Health Savings Account will be administered for the
participants by Nationwide Retirement Solutions and all costs related to
the ongoing administration thereof will be borne by plan participants,
based on the fees and charges established by Nationwide Retirement
Solutions, which may change from time to time, and not the City.
C. FIRE CHIEF
The Fire Chief will contribute the agreed upon percent of the cash value of
his/her accumulated vacation and eligible sick leave time to the Retiree
Health Savings Account, upon separation from the City. It is understood
that the funds contributed are limited to paying for qualified medical
premiums.
The Fire Chief will review the provisions of the Retiree Health Savings
Account on a yearly basis, in June of every fiscal year, and notify the City
of any changes that are desired in the contribution value of his/her
account on or before July 1 of the following fiscal year.
The Retiree Health Savings Account will be administered for the
participants by Nationwide Retirement Solutions and all costs related to
P-186
the ongoing administration thereof will be borne by plan participants,
based on the fees and charges established by Nationwide Retirement
Solutions, which may change from time to time.
SECTION 12: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE
When a death occurs in the family of a full-time employee, the employee shall be
granted up to five (5) bereavement leave days with pay. A death certificate or other
acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is
allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic
partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children,
employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic
partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, brother-in-
law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's
spouse's grandchildren, or a blend relative residing with employee. The City Manager
or designee shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner
refer to registered domestic partners, as defined by California Family Code §297).
SECTION 13: PERSONAL LEAVE
Employees can use up to 20 hours of accrued sick leave; vacation, administrative leave
or holiday time as personal leave. These 20 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1
hour; '/z hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the
employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using the time.
Personal leave can be taken after six months of service.
SECTION 14: VACATION
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation
monthly according to the following schedule, Vacation can be taken after six months of
service.
Length of Service Hours Accrued Annual Hours
!n Years Per Pay Period Accrued
1 3.077 80
2 3.461 90
3 3.846 100
4 4.230 110
5 4.615 120
6-8 5.000 130
9 5.384 140
10 5.769 150
11-13 6.153 160
14 6.538 170
15+ 6.923 180
P-187
SECTION 15: VACATION BUYBACK
The City will provide the [total] cash value of up to 80 hours of vacation leave annually,
that may be bought back during either November or April. Employees must maintain a
minimum of 80 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buy
back time, Employees who wish to buy back vacation must request payment of not less
than 40 hours and not more than 80 hours. For the 2011/12 fiscal year only the total
hours available for buyback shalt be increased to 100 hours, however, the
maintenance of a minimum balance of 80 hours of accrued vacation will not change.
SECTION 16: SICK LEAVE
All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave
annually. Sick leave can be taken after six months of service.
The City shall provide eligible employees with leave of absence due to family and
personal health purposes as provided by the U.S. Family and Medical Leave Act
("FMIA; 29 U.S.C. section 2601 et seq.) and the California Family Rights Act ("CFRA";
California Government Code section 12945.2). The City's FMLA/CFRA policy is
incorporated herein by reference. The City shall also provide leave of absence for
reasons covered by FMLA relating to covered relationships who are members of the
military pursuant to the 2008 amendments to FMLA contained, in the National Defense
Authorization Act.
SECTION 17: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK
Employees who terminate their City employment after 5 years of continuous service and
have at least 50% of five years of sick leave accrued on the books upon termination can
sell 120 hours back to the City.
SECTION 18: HOLIDAYS
The City Hall Offices observe the following 14 holidays. All full-time continuous salaried
employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days:
~'~ July 4
I21 First Monday of September
csl November 11
I'I Fourth Thursday of November
csl Day following Thanksgiving
cef December 24
7
Independence Day
Labor Day
Veteran's Day
Thanksgiving Day
Day preceding Christmas
P-188
c~~ December 25
cep January 1
lal Third Monday of January
Christmas Day
New Years Day
Martin Luther King's Birthday
I70~ Third Monday of February President's Day
~"~ Last Monday of May Memorial Day
tie) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her
convenience after six months of service subject to approval of the
department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to
the next.
Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a
holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday
shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving,
Christmas, etc.} where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City
Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the
holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday. For
example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however
Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. For Christmas,
Wednesday will be observed as the regular holiday; however Tuesday (the day
preceding Christmas) will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the
instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas or New Years, employees will have until June 30 to
use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those
days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each
year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays.
Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to
use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May
and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday.
SECTION 19: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY
The City shall provide employees up to four months natal and adoption leave for the
birth dr adoption of a child; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the
California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code section 12945},
if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on
this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for
the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force
during the leave of absence.
P-189
SECTION 2O: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY
Employees are granted up to 2 days natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or
adoption of a child: Any paid time required beyond this initial 2 days must be charged to
sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time.
SECTION 21: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE
Any employee covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers
Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the
performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the
first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the
difference between the disability payments received under the Workers Compensation
Act and the employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without
any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such
payments shall commence on the first (151) day of such disability absence. In the event
the employee`s disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be
allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with
available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time.
The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall
not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose,
accrued leave hours can be used in one-hour increments.
SECTION 22: MILITARY LEAVE
Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military
and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation the military orders must be submitted
to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that
pay period.
SECTION 23: MILITARY SERVICE BUY BACK
Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense.
SECTION 24: RETIREMENT BENEFIT
Emplovees Hired Before Julv 4, 2011
§ 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation
City pays 8 % normal PERS member
contributions by resolution
Emplovees Hired on or After July 4, 2011
§ 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula
§ 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor
§ 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation
City pays 7% normal PERS member
contributions; employee pays 1 % by
resolution.
P-7 90
Employees hired between September 1,
2010 and July 3, 2011 shall pay 1% of
normal PERS Member contribution per
Resolution 10-136.
City shall adopt a resolution providing that all employee CaIPERS contributions shall be
deducted on a pre-tax basis.
SECTION 25: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE/ UNIVERSITY COURSES
Effective July 1, 2006, (July 1 through and including the following June 30)
reimbursements by the City of the following enumerated college and/or university
course expenses shall not exceed two thousand three hundred dollars ($2,300.00)
during any fiscal year.
Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $2,300.00 in any one fiscal
year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or
his designee that all of the following conditions precedent exists:
A. Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or
university that is licensed/accredited by the State of California.
B. The applicant for reimbursement shall present to the Personnel Department
documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which
evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of "C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class.
As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is
simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C"
or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to
City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect
no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the
minimal grade was not received).
C. Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1)
those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is
predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the
City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of anon-inclusive
example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the
employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this Section C,
to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful
completion of the course of study in the selected major.
10
P-191
D. Eligibility far reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated
upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written
determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s) for
which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an
accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does
exist. The determination of the City Manager or his designee in such regards
shall be final.
E. The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1)
tuition; 2) books; 3) supplies; 4) parking; and, 5) laboratory. In addition to all
other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to
reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the
Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which
reimbursement is sought.
SECTION 26: 4110 WORK WeeK
City Hall operates on a 4/10 work week, hours lam to 6pm, Monday through Thursday.
Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times.
SECTION 27: B~-LINGUAL PAY
Employees who qualify for bi-lingual pay will be provided $50.00 per month.
SECTION 28: FURLOUGHS
Employees will be required to take sixty (60) hours of unpaid furlough during Fiscal Year
2011/12. The number of furlough days will depend on the employee's regular work
schedule. Employees will have four options to complete the sixty (60) hour furlough as
outlined below, with the final, irrevocable decision to be made in writing by May 31,
2011. Once the City has received in writing the decision by all employees regarding
their preferred method of meeting their furlough obligation, the City will, within forty-five
(45) calendar days, provide a written Furlough Implementation Schedule to the affected
departments and to the negotiation team for each affected employee group.
Furlough Options:
e Vacation Hours -The employee may elect to "give back" sixty (60) hours from
their accrued vacation leave bank to the City.
A. If an employee opts to give back vacation leave hours but does not
have all sixty (60) hours available, the City will permit the employee to
accumulate the additional hours through January 31, 2012. If the
employee has not accumulated sufficient vacation hours by January
31, 2012, then the employee must take the balance of the sixty (60)
11
P-192
hours as unpaid furlough hours during the period February 2012
through June 30, 2012.
B. Probationary employees who complete probation prior to May 31, 2012
and have elected, in advance, to have sixty (60) hours deducted from
their accrued vacation balance, shall have the deduction made at the
conclusion of probation. If the employee does not complete probation
prior to May 31, 2012, cone-time exception shall be made to allow the
deduction of the accrued leave by June 30, 2012 if they so chose. If a
probationary employee has not accrued sixty (60) hours as of May 31,
2012, then the employee must take the balance of the sixty (60) hours
as unpaid furlough hours by June 30, 2012. Any probationary
employee who did not chose to deduct accrued leave shall take the
balance of the sixty (60) hours as unpaid furlough hours during the
period February 2012 through June 30, 2012.
• Unpaid Furlough Hours - An employee may elect to take sixty (60) unpaid
furlough hours during the period July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012.
Furlough hours may be scheduled in full ten (10) hour increments or five (5) hour
increments for those employees who work ten (10) hour schedules. However, a
maximum of thirty (30) hours can be taken in fve (5) hour increments.
Furlough hours may be scheduled in full eight (8) hour increments or four (4)
hour increments for those employees who work eight (8) hour schedules.
However, a maximum of twenty-eight (28) hours can be taken in four (4) hour
increments.
• Holiday Closure - An employee may elect to take unpaid furlough hours during
the three (3) day holiday closure described in Section 39 and choose either of the
preceding options to total sixty (60) hours of furlough. If an employee furloughs
during the holiday closure period but is subsequently called in to work, that day
shall not be counted toward the employee's required sixty (60) hours of furlough.
Furlough Spread Over 26 Pay Periods - As an option to spread the furlough
obligation over the full 26 pay periods in the 2011112 fiscal year, employees may
elect to furlough 2.31 hours per pay period. These employees will work their
normal (80 hour) work week (less any regular holiday, vacation, sick or other
leave) but will note 2.31 hours of furlough on each time sheet which will result in
payment for 77.69 hours of non-furlough time per 80 hour pay period.
12
P-193
SECTION 29: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE
Certain City Facilities shall close for three days during the period December 26, 2011
through January 2, 2012. In addition to the regular scheduled City holiday of December
26, 2011, City Hall and the City Yard shall close December 27, 28 and 29. Closure
dates for the Libraries, the Cultural Center and other Community Services facilities shall
be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services with the
need for cost savings. During this closure employees may take paid leave from holiday,
management leave, or vacation accruals; however, unpaid leave may only be taken
from furlough hours.
CITY
Jack Lam
City Manager
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
Linda Daniels
Deputy City Manager
13
P-194
STAFF REPORT _~''->
PURC.IC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTA2ENT
Date: April 20, 2011 NCHO
CiUCAMONGA
To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director/City Manager
From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director
By: Emest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent
Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer
Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF 9 VEHICLES TO MULTIPLE FORD
DEALERSHIPS AS FOLLOWS: ONE (1) TO THEODORE ROBINS FORD OF COSTA
MESA, CALIFORNIA; TWO (2) TO FAIRVIEW FORD FLEET CENTER OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA; AND SIX (6) FROM RACEWAY FORD OF RIVERSIDE,
CALIFORNIA AS PER REQUEST FOR BID ("RFB") #10/11-010 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$317,966.11 FROM ACCT. NO. 1712001-5604 (VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT
REPLACEMENT FUND) AND $30,455.49 FROM ACCT. NO. 2520801-5804 (SPORTS
COMPLEX FUND); AND AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $83,470
FROM FUND 712 FUND BALANCE (VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT) AND
$960 FROM FUND 520 (SPORTS COMPLEX) FUND BALANCE TO BE USED BY THE
PUBLIC WORKS PARKS AND STREETS SECTIONS
ECOMMENDATIO
It is recommended that the City Council and Redevelopment Agency Board authorize the purchase of 9
vehicles to multiple Ford dealerships as follows: one (1) to Theodore Robins Ford of Costa Mesa,
California; two (2) to Fairview Ford Fleet Center of San Bernardino, Cal'rfomia; and six (6) from Raceway
Ford of Riverside, California as per Request for Bid ("RFB°) #10/11-010 in the amount of $317,966.11
from account number 1712001-5604 (Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund) and $30,455.48 from
account number 2520601-5604 (Sports Complex}; and authorize an appropriation in the amount of
$83,470 from fund 712 fund balance and $960 from fund 520 (Sports Complex) fund balance to be used
by the Public Works Parks and Streets Sections.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
City Council and the Redevelopment Agency Board approved the purchase of the above nine (9)
vehicles in the adopted FY 2010/11 budget as a part of the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund
and Sports Complex Fund. The Public Works Services Department provided specifications to the
Purchasing Department for the purchase of these vehicles.
Purchasing prepared and posted to the City's bid system, RFB #10111-010, there were fifteen (15}
vendors that were notified; fifteen (15) vendors downloaded the RFB, and five (5) responses that were
received. After analysts of the bid responses by the Fleet Supervisor, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet
Superintendent and Purchasing Staff, it has been determined to be in the City's best interest to split the
award for the nine (9) vehicles to each of the most responsive, responsible bidders that meet the
spec~cations'required by the Public Works Services Department as follows:
AU"fHORILA'ITON'1'ORWARD THE PURCHASE OF 9 VEHICLES
APRIL 20, 2011 ,
PnG13 TW0
P-195
BId ftemlBudget Description Assigned
Section Fuel
Type Award
Amount Account Dealer
One (1) Ford E-350 Extended Wagon Parks CNG 543,528.33 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
Eleven Passenger Van / Rplc SR# 1412
wl112 Tn Pass Van
One (1) Ford F-250 Standard Cab Streets CNG $39,949.36 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
Truck / Rplc SR# 1591 wl3l4 Tn ExCb
P/U
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck / Rplc SR# Parks CNG 542,901.04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
1328 wi314 Tn ExCb P!U
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck / Rpic #10526 Parks CNG $42,901.04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
wl3/4 Ton PU Ex Cab
One (1) Ford F-250 Truck! Rplc#10531 Parks CNG 542,901,04 1712001-5604 Raceway Ford
w1314 Ton PU Ex Cab
One (1) Ford F-250 Super Cab Truck 1 Streets CNG 543,078.10 17120D1-5604 Raceway Ford
Rplc SR# 608 w1314 Tn ExCb P/U
One (1} Ford F-350 with Utility Body Streets Unleaded 528,445.46 1712001-5604 Theodore
Truck / Rplc SR# 2617 w/1 Ton ExCb Robins Ford
Uttllty
One (1) Ford F-350 Tlvck with Parks Unleaded 534,261.74 1712001-5804 Fairview Ford
Dumping Stake Bed / Rplc SR#1592
One (1) 2011 Ford F-250 Truck with Parks Unleaded $30,455.49 2520801-5604 Fairview Ford
Dumping Stake Bed / Rplc SR# 1521 (RDA)
w1314 Tn PU FKbd
TOTAL $348,421.60
All applicable Bid documentation is on file in the City's electronic Procurement System and can be
located through the City's Internet.
Res ully Itte ,
I
William Wittkopf
Public Works Services Director
WW/ER:kh
MEMORANDUM-
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP~1RTbfENT
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer
Subject: City Council Agenda April 20, 2011 Item L15 and L16
Engineering Services Department is requesting the following City Council Agenda Item be
removed from the agenda. This request is being submitted because Engineering will be
advertising a Public Hearing instead of Consent. Staff will bring the item back to City Council at
a later date.
Agenda Item L15 (page L196) Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District
No. 2011-01 along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue.
Agenda Item L16 (page L199) Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District
No. 2011-02 along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue.
P-196
STAFF REPORT '~-~ , ;
FNGINFERING SP~ItVICL.S DP,PiViTMF.N"r
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 C;tiCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer
Subject: ESTABLISHMENT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2011-01 ALONG
BASE LINE ROAD FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO VINEYARD AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of a Resolution establishing Underground Utility District No. 2011-01 along Base Line
Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
City personnel met with Southern California Edison (SCE) to discuss a project to underground the
existing overhead electrical and other utility lines along the north side of Base Line Road from
Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue. The City will use its SCE Rule 20A fund allocation to fund
this work.
SCE allocates utility underground funds to each City based on the number of electrical meters in
the City. The use of these funds is governed by SCE's Rule 20 regulations. Rule 20A covers all
activities for the underground work and all work is paid by SCE. Rule 20A funds are reserved for
heavily used and/or scenic streets. The project must also be a minimum of 600 feet in length. Rule
20A funds can only be used in an area designated as an underground district, hence the formation
of this district.
This underground project will result in the complete removal of the overhead utility lines along most
of the Alta Loma High School frontage and the "Stater Brothers' commercial center frontage to the
first power pole east of Vineyard Avenue.
The utility underground work is estimated to cost $2.3 million. The City's Rule 20A allocation from
SCE is $1.1 million. The City is able to contribute $.5 million from its Base Line Road utility
undergrounding fee account. Normally, this project would be postponed until additional funding
becomes available. However, SCE Rule 20A allows SCE to "lend" the project future City Rule 20A
allocations so this utility underground project may proceed. This will result in a negative allocation
to the City for several years.
spec u ubmitted,
Mark teuer "`
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MASNVCS:Is
Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution
Naar: Rn.
~.{
! UPl,ElNI1
~IT`~ ~~ RAI~TC~~ C~J~AI~~?~~A
_ _ ~~,
~~
I ~ Rw
aK
1 ,.
PROJECT
~ t!MlTS
~.
s`L ~ ! &
afPWID aVC (T~la)
~ `~
, xr
V
~ !~
~ . .aaK r.,
u
~ a
~~
! i a.kR
a
~ as uic RGO
I 'm' ~ I ~
~ ~
~ ~
5 EI
~
ism«n: n.w ~ tsReR ~ ~ 6 .a
I
~ ~
~ ~
*-
,ItlIDN ~ i
i I
x~aT Riw
... ...... ~ ~ ~
arzzrRa
.n clan I
.a sfa[[r
MK
w Vlr j(YLG! 0
~J
Vl~dla !T.
i tires . ..
1~'ONTANA
CIrI'~i' aF I~ANCff~® C~3CAl~C?1~GA
;.~ ~_ti~- ~TIL.I~"1( UN®E~GR®UN~INC~ ®ISTRICT' 201101
_. ~ E3ASE LINE R®. -- ~~4C~NELI~N `~~ ~INEl'AR~
P-198
RESOLUTION NO. f I ~O S O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UTILITY
UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 2011-01 ALONG BASE LINE
ROAD FROM CARNELIAN STREET TO VINEYARD AVENUE,
USING SCE RULE 20A FUNDS
WHEREAS, A PUBLIC HEARING was held on April 20, 2011 at the hour of 7:00 P. M. at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California to
determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an
underground district along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California; and
WHEREAS, A NOTICE of such hearing has been given to all effected property owners
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all utilities concerned in the manner and
for the time required by law; and
WHEREAS, SUCH HEARING has been duly and regularly held and all persons
interested have been given an opportunity to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California as follows:
Section 1: It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Section 13.04 and the definitions contained herein that the public necessity,
health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district along Base Line
Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue in order to remove excessive overhead utility
wires and associated structures, and to underground utilities along said portion of Base Line
Road. Base Line Road is a public street that is extensively used by the general public and
carries heavy volumes of vehicular traffic.
Section 2: An underground utility district to be known as Underground Utility District
No. 2002-01, is hereby established in that area along Base Line Road in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, shown upon that certain map entitled "Underground Utility District No.
2002-01", which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, more particularly described as follows:
The north half of Base Line Road, being 60 feet in width, from Carnelian Street to
Vineyard Avenue, approximately 1500 feet in length.
Section 3: The electrical wires and associated overhead structures shall be removed
from the first power pole west of Carnelian Street to the first power pole east of Vineyard
Avenue.
Section 4: Underground installation shall be accomplished by the utility companies.
Section 5: The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy hereof and a copy of
Municipal Code Section 13.04 to all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and to all affected utilities within ten days after adoption of this resolution.
MEMORANDUM
ENGINEERING SERVICES DL'PAR'PML'NI'
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer
Subject: City Council Agenda April 20, 2011 Item L15 and L16
Engineering Services Department is requesting the following City Council Agenda Item be
removed from the agenda. This request is being submitted because Engineering will be
advertising a Public Hearing instead of Consent. Staff will bring the item back to City Council at
a later date.
Agenda Item L15 (page L196) Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District
No. 2011-01 along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue.
Agenda Item L16 (page L199) Approval of establishment of Underground Utility District
No. 2011-02 along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue.
P-199
STAFF REPORT ~-- ~ ~
E!vc~~~r~xrNC Seav[crs Dr~[~n~rrsrl.;r 1` Y-
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 CUCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
By: Walter C. Stickney, Associate Engineer
Subject: ESTABLISHMENT OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2011-02 ALONG
ARROW ROUTE FROM BEAR GULCH PARK TO VINEYARD AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of a Resolution establishing Underground Utility District No. 2011-02 along Arrow Route
from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue.
BACKGROUNDlANALYSIS
City personnel met with Southern California Edison (SCE) to discuss a project to underground the
existing overhead electrical and other utility lines along the north side of Arrow Route from Bear
Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue. The City will use its SCE Rule 20A fund allocation to fund this
work.
SCE allocates utility underground funds to each City based on the number of electrical meters in
the City. The use of these funds is governed by SCE's Rule 20 regulations. Rule 20A covers all
activities for the underground work and all work is paid by SCE. Rule 20A funds are reserved for
heavily used and/or scenic streets. The project must also be a minimum of 600 feet in length. Rule
20A funds can only be used in an area designated as an underground district, hence the formation
of this district.
This underground project will result in the complete removal of the overhead utility lines along the
Bear Gulch Park frontage to the Vineyard Avenue.
The utility underground work is estimated to cost $2.0 million. The City is able to contribute $0.7
million from its Arrow Route utility undergrounding fee account. However because the City's Rule
20A allocation from SCE will be used first to underground the utilities in Underground Utility District
No. 2011-01 (Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Avenue), it will be several years
before there are sufficient funds in the City's Rule 20A allocation to underground the utilities in
Underground Utility District No. 2011-02.
Rf;a subpmi~tted~,
Mark A. Steuer
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
MASNVCS:Is
Attachments: Vicinity Map and Resolution
c~TY ®~ ~e~o cv E ~oN~
vzc~rr~ n~
~.
-~..~
~~~ __ -~~
' .r° ,~~~-: ~16TL~TY UIVDERGROClNDIIVG DISTRICT 201'-02
_ ERR®Vif RTC. - SEAR C~dJLCH P/~RK TC3 ~911V~~'~lRD
6 ~ { Y 1 0 Fi ~ LJ A T!T P ' ~ ~ ~ 6w~{ g"~' ry ~ 7 ~ !^t A T ~tl a
P-201
RESOLUTION NO. ~J--D.J
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UTILITY
UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 2011-02 ALONG ARROW
ROUTE FROM BEAR GULCH PARK TO VINEYARD AVENUE,
USING SCE RULE 20A FUNDS
WHEREAS, A PUBLIC HEARING was held on April 20, 2011 at the hour of 7:00 P.M. at
the City Hall Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California to
determine whether the public necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an
underground district along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California; and
WHEREAS, A NOTICE of such hearing has been given to all effected property owners
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all utilities concerned in the manner and
for the time required by law; and
WHEREAS, SUCH HEARING has been duly and regularly held and all persons
interested have been given an opportunity to be heard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California as follows:
Section 1: It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga
Municipal Code Section 13.04 and the definitions contained herein that the public necessity,
health, safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district along Arrow
Route from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard Avenue in order to remove excessive overhead utility
wires and associated structures, and to underground utilities along said portion of Arrow Route.
Arrow Route is a public street that is extensively used by the general public and carries heavy
volumes of vehicular traffic.
Section 2: An underground utility district to be known as Underground Utility District
No. 2002-02, is hereby established in that area along Arrow Route in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California, shown upon that certain map entitled "Underground Utility District No.
2002-02", which is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, more particularly described as follows:
The north half of Arrow Route, being 60 feet in width, from Bear Gulch Park to Vineyard
Avenue, approximately 1,300 feet in length.
Section 3: The electrical wires and associated overhead structures shall be removed
from the first power pole west of Bear Gulch Park to the first power pole east of Vineyard
Avenue.
Section 4: Underground installation shall be accomplished by the utility companies.
Section 5: The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail a copy hereof and a copy of
Municipal Code Section 13.04 to all affected property owners as shown on the last equalized
assessment roll and to all affected utilities within ten days after adoption of this resolution.
P-202
ORDINANCE NO. tt40
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00141, A
REQUEST TO AMEND CHAPTERS 5.12, 17.10, 17.30 AND
17.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGULATING ENTERTAINMENT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Municipal Code Amendment
No. DRC2010-00141, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,
the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the amendment."
2. On March 17, 2010, the City Council approved a request to initiate a Municipal Code
Amendment.
3. On July 14, 2010, staff presented their initial findings and recommendations to the
Planning Commission.
4. On August 4, 2010, staff presented proposed changes to the Municipal Code
regarding entertainment to a joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission.
5. On March 9, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced amendment and,
following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 11-11, recommending that the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment.
6. On April 6, 2011, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
duly noticed public hearing on the amendment.
7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct.
SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 6, 2011, including written and oral staff reports,
together with public testimony, the City Council hereby spe~cally finds as follows:
a. The application applies to the property located within the City; and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a sign cant impact on the
environment.
P-203
c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General
Plan and is in conformance with the General Plan; and
d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development
Code by implementing the policies of the General Plan, protecting the stability of land uses, and
attaining the advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource
planning; and
e. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
f. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from
the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA
Guidelines. The project qualifies under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines
because the text amendment is for Gartfication purposes and will not result in the intensification
of environmental impact. It can also be demonstrated with certainty that the text amendment to
clarify and update the regulation of entertainment will not have any significant impact on the
environment. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of
exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concuis in the staffs determination of
exemption.
SECTION 3: Chapter 5.12 of Title 5 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby
amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in Attachments A, B, C, D, and E.
SECTION 4: Table 17.10.030(6) of Section 17.10.030 of Chapter 17.10 of Title 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
shown in Exhibit A..
SECTION 5: Table 17.30.030 of Section 17.30.030 of Chapter 17.30 of TRIe 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
shown in Exhibit B.
SECTION 6: Table 17.32.030 of Section 17.32.030 of Chapter 17.32 of Title 17 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as
shown in Exhibits C and D.
SECTION 7: ff any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or
legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby deGares that it would have adopted this
Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless
of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might
subsequently be deGared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation.
SECTION 8: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause
the same to be published within 15 days after Rs passage at least once in the Inland Valley
Dailv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Cal"rfomia, and
circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia.
weeee see dre /olbwlnp papa
/or formal adoPtlon, cerdllcaUOn and s/gnafures
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 2 of 8
P-204
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20"' day of April 2011.
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting
of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 6"' day of April 2011, and was
passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the
20"' day of April 2011.
Executed this 21" day of April 2011, at Rancho Cucamonga, Cal'rfomia.
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 3 of 8
P-205
ATTACHMENT A
Chapter 5.12 • REGULATION OF ENTERTAINMENT
Sections:
5.12.010 -Permit required.
5.12.020 -Definitions.
5.12.030 -Exclusions.
5.12.040 -Application for permit
5.12.050 -Investigation and hearing.
5.12.060 -Notice of hearing.
5.12.070 -Action at hearing.
5.12.080 • Denial of application.
5.12.090 -Conditions imposed on permit
5.12.100 -Suspension, modification, or revocation of permit
5.12.110 -Fees.
5.12.115 -Annual renewal.
5.42.120 -Transfer of permit
5.12.130 - Nuli~cation of permit.
5.12.140 - Chapter to govern.
5.12.150 -Prohibition and penalties.
5.12.160 -Civil remedies available.
5.12.010 -Permit required.
No person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or premises open to
the public where food or beverages are soW, offered for sale, or given away, and where any
form of entertainment, as defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining a permit
so to do as hereinafter provided for in this Chapter.
5.12.020 -Definitions
A. "Entertainment" means any activity conducted for the primary purpose of diverting or
entertaining clientele at premises open to the general public including, but not limited to,
dancing by either perforrners or clientele, live musical performance, and musical entertainment
provided by a disc jockey, karaoke, or any similar entertainment activity involving reproduced
music.
B. °Ampl~ed~ refers to the use of any mechanical or electronic means such as
microphones, bullhorns, or speakers to increase or intensify the volume of any sound, including
but not limited to vocalizations and sounds produced by any musical instrument.
5.12.030 -Exclusions.
The provisions of this Chapter shall not be deemed to require a permit for the following:
A. For the use of a radio or other electronic playback device, except when utilized by an
announcer or disc jockey whose live performance consists of selecting or manipulating
prerecorded selections of music or other sounds;
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 4 of 8
P-206
B. For any entertainment provided for members and their guests at a private club where
admission is not open to the public;
C. For entertainment conducted in connection with a regularly established motion picture
theater, recreation park, circus, or fairground;
D. For entertainment conduded by or sponsored by any bona fide club, sodety or
association, organized or incorporated for benevolent, charitable, dramatic or IRerary purposes,
having an established membership, and which holds meetings at regular intervals of not less
than once per 3-month period, when proceeds, if any, arising from such entertainment are used
for the purpose of such dub, society or association;
E. For unampl~ed entertainment provided by no more than two performers during meal
service at an established restaurant where dancing is not allowed;
F. For entertainment conducted solely on or at any premises or location which is owned or
operated by, or leased by, to or from the United States, State of California, County of
San Bernardino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, or any agency or subdivision thereof.
G. For any Adult Entertainment Business regulated by Section 17.04.090 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
5.12.040 -Application for permit.
Applicants for Entertainment Permits shall file a written, signed, and verified application with the
City Manager, or his designee, showing:
A. The name and permanent address of the applicant;
B. The name, proposed and current, if any, business address of the applicant. If the
applicant is a corporation, the name shall be exactly as set forth in its articles of incorporation
and the applicant shall show the name and residence address of each of the officers, directors,
and each stockholder owning not less than 25 percent of the stock of the corporation. If the
applicant is a partnership, the application shall show the names and residence addresses of
each of the members, including limited partners;
C. A detailed description of the proposed entertainment, including type of entertainment,
number of persons engaged in the entertainment, and any further information about the
entertainment or entertainers, as the City Manager may deem necessary;
D. The date, hours, and location where the entertainment is proposed to be conducted, and
the admission fee, 'rf any, to be charged;
E. A statement of the nature and character of the applicant's business, 'rf any, to be carried
on in conjunction with such entertainment, including whether or not alcohol will be served as
part of such business;
F. Whether or not the applicant has ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction
with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment revoked, including the date thereof and
name of the revoking agency; and
G. Such other reasonable information as the City Manager, or designee, may deem
necessary.
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 5 of 8
P-207
5.12.050 -Investigation and hearing.
After the application for an Entertainment Permit has been filed, the City Manager shall cause
an investigation to be made of such application, and after such investigation has been
completed he shall cause the application to be set for hearing before the Planning Commission
and shall notify the applicant of the date of such hearing.
5.72.060 -Notice of hearing.
After the City Manager has set the application for hearing, he shall cause notice of the hearing
to be given to all property owners within six hundred sixty (660) feet of the proposed or actual
location of the applicant's business. For the purposes of this section, notice to the property
owners shall be sufficient ff given to those property owners who appear as such on the last
equalized assessment roll. Additionally, the City Manager shall cause a public notice to be
posted at the location where the business or entertainment is to be conducted. All notices
provided for in this section shall be in the form and manner as prescribed by the City Manager.
The applicant shall bear all costs and expenses in mailing, printing, and posting such notices
and shalt pay such costs to the City prior to the time set for public hearing on the pending
application. Failure to pay such costs by the applicant shall be grounds to deny his application.
6.12.070 -Action at hearing.
At the time and place set for public hearing as to any application, and as may be continued from
day to day, the Planning Commission shall hear and determine all the facts and evidence
relevant to the application. At the contusion of the hearing before the Planning Commission,
the Planning Commission shall grant, condftionally grant, or deny the application, which decision
shall be final unless appealed in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.02.0808 of the
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Such decision shalt be set forth in a resolution which shall
be adopted within 30 days after such decision is rendered. ,
5.12.080 -Denial of application.
The Planning Commission may deny an application for an Entertainment Permit if it makes any
of the following findings:
A. The conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would be contrary to
the public health, safety, morals or welfare; or
B. The premises or establishment is likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or
disorderly manner, or
C. That granting the application would create a public nuisance; or
D. That the normal operation of the premises would interfere with the peace and quiet of
any surrounding residential neighborhood; or
E. The applicant has made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in
the required application.
5.12.090 -Conditions Imposed on permit.
After the public hearing as to any application, the Planning Commission in granting any pennft
may also impose such reasonable conditions as to the use or extent of such permit as it deems
appropriate.
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 6 of 8
P-208
5.12.100 -Suspension, modification, or revocation of permit
A. After notice and hearing, the Planning Commission may suspend, modify, or revoke any
permit granted pursuant to this Chapter if said commission makes any of the following findings:
1. The applicant made a false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact
in the application for permit, or any report or record required to be filed pursuant to this Chapter
or conditions imposed on the approval of the permit; or
2. The premises are being operated in violation of any provision of this Chapter, or
of any statute, ordinance, or condftion relating to or in conjunction with the permitted
entertainment; or
3. The premises are being operated in a manner contrary to the peace, health,
safety, and general welfare of the public.
B. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be set forth in a resolution which shall be
adopted within 30 days of the date of such decision and shall be final unless appealed in
accordance with <he provisions of Section 17.02.0806 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code.
5.12.110 -Fees.
The fee for an Entertainment Permit shall be set by Council resolution in accordance with
Section 1.16.010 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and shall be revised periodically to
reflect the changes in the cost of processing and investigation. Such permit shall be in addition
to any Business license fee as may be required by the Business License law of the City.
5.12.115 -Annual renewal.
Entertainment permits require submission of an annual renewal statement and fee, due on or
before January 1 of each and every year. A written request for one (1) thirty day (30) extension
may be submitted and is subject to approval of the City Manager, or his designee. The applicant
for every renewal of an Entertainment Permit shall submit to the City Manager, or his designee,
a written statement setting forth such information concerning the applicant's business during the
preceding year as may be required by the City Manager to enable him to ascertain whether the
information listed on their original Entertainment Permit application has changed in the past
year. The City Manager, or his designee, shall review the information and determine 'rf a
mod cation to the Entertainment Permit is warranted. The Planning Commission shall review
any such mod cation pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.
5.12.120 - Transfer of Permit
A. An Entertainment Permit issued pursuant to this Chapter may be transfered or assigned
to another person or business entity at the same physical location, provided there is no
intensecation of the originally approved entertainment use. Any request for transfer of an
Entertainment Permit due to change in ownership shall be submitted in writing.
B. An Entertainment Permit issued pursuant to this Chapter shall not be transferred or
assigned to another location for any purpose. Any change in location shall require a new
permit. The following shall be deemed a change of location:
1. Any relocation or expansion that includes a separate piece of property or parcel
of land; or
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 7 of 8
P-209
2. Any expansion of the initially permitted premises which represents a greater than
50 percent increase in the square footage of space devoted to public access or occupancy.
5.12.130 -Nullification of permit
An Entertainment Permit shall become null and void ff the business for which it was issued
ceases at anytime to operate for a continuous period of 180 days or more.
5.12.140 - Chapter to govern.
All provisions of this title which are inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of this Chapter
are repealed to the extent such provisions are inconsistent with or contrary to the provisions of
this Chapter.
5.12.150 -Prohibition and penalties.
A. It is unlawful for any person, firm, partnership, or corporation to violate any provision or
to fail to comply wfth any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any person, firm, partnership, or
corporation violating any provision of this Chapter or failing to comply with any of its
requirements shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be
punishable as follows:
1. A fine not exceeding one hundred dollars for a first violation;
2. A fine not exceeding two hundred dollars for a second violation of the same
ordinance within one year;
3. A fine not exceeding five hundred dollars for each additional violation of the same
ordinance within one year.
B. Each such person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate
offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the
provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm,
partnership, or corporation and shall be deemed punishable therefore as .provided in this
Chapter.
C. The provisions of this Chapter shall not be construed as permitting conduct not
prescribed herein and shall not affect the enforceability of any other applicable provisions of law.
5.12.160 -Civil remedies available.
A violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be
abated by the Cky through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent
injunction, or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisance.
Ordinance No. 840 -Page 8 of 8
P-209-A
Rancho Cr~camonga Develonment Corte Section 17. /0.030
Use OP NC GC
4B. Nurseries and garden supply stores; provided, in
the NC district, all equipment, supplies and material
are kept within an enclosed area, and provided that
fertilizer is stored in acka ed form onl .
_
P
P
49. Office and business machine stares. P P P
50. Office supply stores. P - P
51. Parking facilities (commercial) where fees are
char ed. P P
52. Pawn shops. - - C
53. Pet shop. - P P
54. Political or philanthropic headquarters. P P P
55. Plumbing shop end supplies. - - P
Sfi. Photocopy. P P P
5 0 - - P
59. Restaurants (other than fast food).
a. With °^'o^:-a;dfer cocktail lounge
andlor bar.
b. Incidental serving of beer and wine but
without a cocktail lounge or har,
^..~„F-e
C
P
C
P
C
P
6D. o 'r. - P P
61. Second-hand store. - C C
62. Shopping Center subject to provisions in Section
17.10.030-F.4. _ C C
63. Spirftualist readings or astrology forecasting. - - P
64. Sporting goods stores. - P P
65. Stamp and coin shops. - P P
66. Swimming pool supplies. - P P
67. Tailor. - P P
68. Taxidermists. - - P
69. Thrift store. - C C
70. Toy stares. - P P
i1. Travel agencies. P P P
72. Transportation facilities (train and hus, taxi depots). C C C
73. Truck antl trailer rental, sales and service. - - C
1 D/D8
Rancho Cucamonga Derelapment Cncle Seclion 17.30.030
Table 17.30.030 Continued -Use Regulations for Industrial Districts
C
P-209-B
USE 1YPE5 LAND USE IP GI GI GI GI GI IP ~ IP GI MI/HI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MU/OS
SUBAREAS HD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 '9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16
...:r; ra:~...
::;.
... .
..
. r.- ... - :a F*
Adult Entenainment A A A A A A A A A A
AgrlculturaVNursery Supplies 8 Services P P P P P P P P
Animal Care C C C C C C C C
Automotive Fleat Storage C C C C P C C P
~
Autortwtlve Fueling Services C '
*:i" '
Automotive Rental P p p p p p p p p
AutomotivelLlght Truck Repair-Minor p p p p p p p p p -
~
Autamotive/TruckRepair-Major p C P P P P C C C ~~`~'
',
Automotive Sales and Leacing C C C C
Automotive Service Court P P P P C P P P P ' _
Z
Automotive Service Stellon
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C Q
.
'
i
Building Contractor's ORce 8 Yards p p p p p p p p p p p -.
a
Building Contractor's Storage YaN p p ~ V.; ,
BuIlding Malntenence Services p p p p p p p p p p p p •.u:.`
y
-
.
Building B Light Equipment Supplies 8 Sales
P
C
P
C
C
P
P
C
P
C
C
P :
.;
,.
~ ~~. '
w :,'
'
Business Supply Retell8 Services
p'
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
p .
;
;•;a c.
Business Support Services P' P C P P C P P P C P P P P P p
Y
.
.
~~~ !'
Communication Services
Convenience Sales 8 Services P
C' p
C p
C p
P p
P p p
C p
C p p p
C p
C p p p
C p
C ~
,
'
t^;~r ;~
j j,~:'_!
Crematory Services C i"C~~'~7'
•,
"
Entertainment
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C A~
:
~.,m y
Extensive Impact Commecial
Fast Food Sales
Flnancial, Insurence 8 Real Estate Services
C'
P
P
p
C
p
C
p
C
p C
C
p
C
C
C
P C
C C
C C
C
P
P '~ ~.~~
'~'N ~'
;:.p.- ,~
~H~;:;
Food 8 Beverage Sales C' G C C C C C C C C ~-R':
Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals C C C C C P C C C C P „LL ;
HolellMOtel p p p p C .~:'; ~':'
Indoor WholesalelRetall Commercial C C C C C C C '
Laundry Services p p p p p p p p
Medical/Health Cara Services P p p p p p p p p p p p
Personal Services C' C P P P P P C P ~ p p .:
Peuoleum Products Slaraae C C C C C ~ C
~
Recreation Fedlttles C C C C C C C P C C P P P ~
aP P P C P P P P P P P P C _ _-
Resta nls p p p p p p p p
Restaurants with Bar er-Entertaiameat C C C C C C C
Specially BuIlding Supplies 5 Home Improvement
P
P
C _
_
erehause-Style Retail Merchandising ^ C
OT ~~\~
IP -Industrial Park
HO -Haven Avenue Overlay District
GI -General Industrial
MI/HI -Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial
HI -Heavy Industrial
` -Ancillary uses limited to 20 percent of the
floor area per Seclion 17.30.060.5.6.
-Refer to Subarea 12 Special Consideretions
for additional restrictions
P - Permitted Use
C -Conditionally Permltled Use
^ -Non-Marked uses not permitted
A -Adult Entertainment Zoning Pennil Required
MUIOS - tvtixed Use/Open Space
P' -Permitted with Master Plan approval for 35
acres minimum
3110
Rancho Cucarrron~a Depelopr»en1 Code Section 1 %.3?.030
Table 17.32.030 -Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts
Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses
4
P-209-C
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Subare a On e Suba rea Two Sub area Thre e Subarea Pour
MU' I O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU ~ RRC MR LI' O
Anti ue Sho s P I P P I P P P' P P I
Aooarel: I I
a) Boutiques P I P I P P P P P P
6) General P P P P P P P
A liance Stores and Repair P I P P P P
An, Music, Photographic Studios and
Su I Stores P p p p p p P P P' C
Auto Service Station C C C C C C C C C
Auto Service (including trailers,
motarcyeles, Goals, campers):
a) Sales (with ancillary rspalr
recllllies)
p
p
P
P
C
b) Renlels I P P P P
c) Minor Repair (does not Nclude
maJor engine work, muffler
shops, painting, body work,
upholstery, ale.)
C
C
C
dJ Colnop Washing C C C
e) Automatic Washing C C C C
f Parts end Su lies I P P P P
Bakeries, retail onl) P P P P P P P P P P
Berber end Beeu Shops P P P P P P P P P P P P
Bed end Breakfast C C C C C C C C C
Bi cle Sho s P P P P P P P
Blue tint and Photoco Services P P P P P P P P P
Book, Gdt and Stationery Stores
(other Than adult related matedal P P P P P P P P P P P C
Cand and Cardectioneries P P P P P P P P P
Cetedn Establishments P I P P P P P P P
Chine and Glassware Stores P P P P P P P
Chdsbnas TrePJPumpkin Sales Lots
(o cretin on a tam om basis P P P
Chu e C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C
and and Press
~stabllshments p p P P P P P P P P C
Cocktail Lounge (bar, Ipunge, tevem)
irtGudixa-re{ated~eaterialameRt C C C C C C C C C C
mmerciel Rec eatlo el;
a do uses su es 6ovAln and
bllllar
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and
basketball C C C C I C C C C C
Convalescent FadlHias 8 Hos flats P P P I P P P P P P P P P P
Cunain and Dra a Sha s P I P P I
1 P P P P I I
Da Care Centem C C C C I C C C C C C C C C C
1 Reler to Subarea 4 Sacllon 17.32.OBD.F.7.b (loolnole 2).
2 All indusldel aces antl davelapmanl standards shell he es provAed in Subarea 7 of Chepler 17.30.
3 Subject to Master Plen requirements pursuant l0 17.32030.0.
4 ComrnerdaVOftlce uses may be located In the RRC tllstriq only with the concurrent development of one major regionally rotated anchor buslnesc of
at least 15,D00 square teal per 61te or plojed. This provlcion is inlentled la ladlitate Ina tlavelopmanl of lerpe, reaionally reialed uses. Reglonalty
Relates CammerrJal uses are lypmed by large scale businesses which serve a market area slgnlarently larger roan Ihoae bueineaen wmlen draw
wstomars pdmarily Tram the neighborhood or community level.
5 Public Smmge may be located in the RRC dktdct anN within an enGOSed Grilding. No oultloor stora0e Is pennlneo. The puGic storage use may
acvpy a por0on of en eziskng recall buJdinp pmvitled the bultlmg Is al least 54,000 square feet, the Pu611c storape use does not occupy Ina Drat
700 tool depth of storehonl leasable area, and the public storage use aces rot pcolpy more Inan 50 percent of the ground poor of the building.
~~~~~°h~~1~'t ~ 17.32-11 4/09
r
Rancho Cucamonga Developmem Cade Section 17.33.030
P-209-D
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Subar ea On e Subarea Two Sub area Thre e Subarea Four
MU' I 0 I MR P SC I CC O MR MHR SC CC CO Lrmt IMR U MU ~ RRC MR LI' O
Public antl Private Clubs end Lodges,
including YMCA, YWCA, and similar
Youth Gr I I
I
i
C
cord tl Tepe P I I P P P P I P P P
Recreational Vehlcl Stora e I I C
Restaurants sit tlown : I I
a) with eateHa7RRwgFaRdJer cocktail
lounge endlor bar C C C C C C C C C C
b) inddental sserving of beer antl
wine (without a cocktail lounge or
bar-antegaiarneat-er-denaiag)
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
I P
c) cafe, limltetl to 2D seats (Inclutling
outdoor sealing)
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
F od: riv C C C C C C
Without drive-Ihru P P P P P P P P
Shoe Stores end Re air Shops P I P P P P P P P P
S ecialt Retail P P P P P P
Soorting Goods Stores:
a) Specially; Backpacking, Tennis,
Skling, Mountaineering, Fishing,
etc.
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
b) General; ancompessing a variety
ois arts a ul ment P P P P . P
Su ennerkets P P P I P P
Swimmin Pool Sarvlces and Su lies P P P P P
Taller Sho s P P P P P I P P
To Stores P P P I P P I P P
Variety Department Stores. Junior
De artment Stores C C P I C P P' P
Vetednarv (domestic): I
e) Non-boarding P C P I C P P i P P C
b Bdardin C I C I C C I C C
Watch end Clock Repair Stores P I P P P P P P P P
Yardaoe Goods Storec P I P P P P
ENTERTAINMENT AND CULTURAL Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four
USES
MV O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR L O
Arcades C C C C C C C
Cuqurel Anist ExhLilst
a) Indoor Gallery and Ad Sales P C P P C P P
b Outdoor Art Exhibits P C P C P C C
Discolhe ues C C C C C C C
Theaters:
a) Dinner Theater P P P P C P
S) Movie Theater Includin Multiplex P P P P
1 Reler to Subaree 9 Sreon 77,32A00.F.i .b (Icotnole 2).
2 All mtluslnel uses and development stantlertls shell be as Drovltletl M Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.70.
3 SuhjeW b rdaater Plan requhemenu pursuant Io 17.32.030. D.
a CommerctallOffirn uses may be locatetl In the RRC diradcf only vrilh the eoneurtenl development of one major regionally relatetl anchor busmeas of
at leas) 16,D00 square leer per site a project This provision is intelMed tc fad6tal lne development o! large, replonaily related uses. Regionally
Related Commercial uses ere lypl0etl by large scale businesses which serve a marF,el area signlgcan0y IaR1er Nen (hose businesses vrtl¢h tlmw
customers primarily Imm the neighborhootl or pommumty level.
5 Publi Storage may ce located in the RRC d'¢Incl only within an endosetl huiltlinp. No outtloor slnrage Is pennlned. the Duohc storage use may
o,xupy a portion of on existing rem0 building provided Iha bulltlina is at least aO.ODD square leer, the public storage use does not occuDY the hrst
10D loot tleGn of smrelrnnl Inawhle araa one me oubl¢ storage use tloes ml w_rupy more than 50 percent al the Ground rmor o! the buildinc.
4109
17.32-13
P~LL~1s~110 tl~.A U~
P-210
,,_ ~.
STAFF REPORT '~^
ENGINEERING SERVICES DEP.jRT:'~fEN1' '`
i
Date: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
C,UCAD90NCA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering ServiceslCity Engineer
By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager ~~
Subject: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3
OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council adopts a Resolution amending the existing electric rates, fees and charges pursuant to
the requirements and authority of Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS
The City Council established a municipal utility on August 31, 2001. The City subsequently undertook
actions necessary to obtain electricity from energy suppliers and build the necessary facilities to distribute
the acquired electricity to retail customers within the City. The City Council determined that the adoption
of Electric Service Rules and Regulations was necessary to further the orderly distribution of the
electricity to the City's retail customers. The City Council subsequently adopted Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 of
the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Cade establishing Electricity Service Rules and Regulations and
authorizing that the rates, fees and charges, may be amended from time to time by resolution.
Effective March 1, 2011, Southern California Edison's rates were modified to implement the revision the
Transmission Charge Component. The net effect will increase rates on average of 0.3 percent per month
for Small Commercial, Outside Lighting, Street Lighting, Traffic Control, Irrigation and Wireless
Technology customers and an average increase of 1.2 percent per month for Medium, Medium TOU and
Large Commercial customers. This change in RCMU Electric Service Rates will maintain parity with SCE
Electric Service Rates effective April 1, 2011.
The City has provided the required notification to the public by publishing notice of this hearing on April 7,
2011, and April 14, 2011, in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local newspaper of general circulation, and
posting notice in at least two separate locations within the City. The proposed revised rates have been
available for public review in the City Clerk's Office since the advertisements and resolution were first
published on April 8, 2011.
The amended rates, fees and charges reflect the City's reasonable and prudent costs for such an
enterprise and do not establish unfair, unreasonable or excessive rates that exceed the City's reasonable
costs of doing business.
Respgotfutly~st~bm fitted,
!! Y: _y _._...s.a~a
Mark A. teuer
Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer
Attachment
P-211
RESOLUTION NO. ~" D
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING ELECTRIC RATES, FEES AND CHARGES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORITY OF
CHAPTER 3.46 OF TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE.
A. Recitals.
1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted Chapter 3.46 of
Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code establishing Electricity Service Rules and
Regulations and authorizing that the rates, fees and charges arising, directly or indirectly,
under said legislation be adopted pursuant to resolution, and thereafter. be amended from
time to time by resolution.
2. City staff has prepared a comprehensive schedule of the rates, fees and charges that reflect
the reasonable and prudent costs relating to the acquisition and distribution of electric power
to retail customers and are recommending that the City Council adopt the recommended
fees. These rates do not present the City an opportunity to achieve profits or to impose
charges in excess of the costs reasonably related to the development, maintenance and
expansion of a municipal electric distribution system. The City Council has directed City staff
to regularly review the operations of the City's electric utility to ensure that the rates are
sufficient to cover all prudent business costs, reserves and capital equipment acquisition but
not exceeding the amount necessary for the same. The rates, fees and charges reflect the
reasonable costs to the City system only and do not reflect any excess rates, fees, or charges
that are in excess of the reasonable costs of providing the electrical services as set forth
hereinafter.
3. The City Council has reviewed the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and has determined that the
adoption of the Electric Rules and Regulations has no foreseeable potential to a result in a
signrficant impact upon the environment and is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Further, the City Council has determined that the
adoption of the fees is exempt from substantive environmental review under Section 15273 of
the State CEQA Guidelines as no capital projects for system expansion are included in the
proposed action.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and
resolve as follows:
Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct.
Section 2. The rates, fees and charges assessed under Chapter 3.46 of Title 3 shall be as set
forth on Attachment 1 hereto and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
P-212
RanUw Cummcnga Mu~icpal UliLly
CunaM Rata PrOpwed Rate
a 0t e9 0(
muxgll uvx ml
LUa(OIn81 CIe98KCatlon
VJglad AUg ft81e 'a.'gtaC AVg Rate Wp'ed AVy Rete
Summer Winter Summer Wnler Sumnzr 'Mmtt
Smell Commeraal
EnrgyLMrge (SAMT) O.t01fi] 01325) 0.1021fi 0.13342 0]% 04%
Customer Charge (Stray) O.J2800 0]2800 O]28CC 012800
Three PM1eae Service (Utley) 403200 0.0]200 0.032Cq 003200
MBOUm COmm9rO81
Errergy Onerpe (SMWm)
Non-TOU OOBB]0 0.01493 0.08830 0.0]493 OD% 0.0%
TOU
Summer On-Pank 0.1319] 0.1319] 00%
Summar Md~Peak 008905 008905 O.U%
Summer O.Y~Peah 006552 O.OFS52 00%
W4nter Mid~Paek OOBb34 O,OBG34 D,BX
NSnIar OPoPaak 006285 O. W205 0.0%
Dnm4rM Charge (54tN0
ferilllles Reiatea 12.N 12,11 t2R5 1225 11% t2%
Time Ralaletl Non TOU ~ S1m1m 15 26 ~ t9 26 -
TimaRelalatlTOU-Summ On 16.00 ~ tfi BO
Time R9lalatl TOU~ Summ Mid 5 IB - S.tfi -
CuslomerCharge(SRAeIerlMOnP) 133.19 133.19 133.19 13319
McLUm Comm WUeI (TOU)
Energy Cnerga (SM'Mt)
Summer OmPeaR 011]25 0.11]25 0.0%
Summa Mltl~Peak 009981 000981 00%
Summer OflfeaK 005905 006905 00X
K4nlBf Mq~Peak O.W26J 0.0]26] 00%
WMler Oh-Peak 0.05981 0 05981 0 0%
DemaM Cnargn (SMVJ)
Fed0bea Reletetl 13.09 1309 1324 1324 1.1% 11%
T'ane ROlele0~OnPOak 14.8] ~ 146]
Tme R¢bletl ~ N.OV'eeh 349 ~ 3.49 -
PmvarFatlOrAQustmanl(tJKVA) 02] 09 02J 02]
Cuslomar LnerBa lUMNerlMOnlh) 46900 465.00 469.00 46900
Large COmmertiel
Ener9Y Lnarye (SM1W41)
Summar On-Peak 0.133]1 0.133]1 00% '
Summer Ml0.PeeK 009246 0.09246 00%
Summar OB~Paak 0.06641 0.00541 0.0%
IMnIBf MItl~Peak 0.08398 0.08398 00%
lMnler Ofl-Peak 0.06354 008354 0.0%
Dementl Cnerpe (fAW~
Fadiige9 Reta;ed 12.46 12.46 12.62 1)62 19% 4.3%
T ne Related ~ On-Peak 1822 - 1012 -
TimeRelata0-Mld-Peak 513 - 5.13 -
PowarFedorAd(uatmenl(LKVA) 01] 02] 02J 02J
Cuslamer CM1erga (SIMOIOtlMuntn) 5]3.02 5]302 SJ3 02, 513.02
Omside Lgnlinp
Energy Cnerga (ShWn) OOJ204 00]204 0.0722E 0.0]226 0.3% 0.3%
Customer Cnerpe (ErMeteilManlh) 14.05 1405 1605 14.05
SIr0e1 LiBM1finp
150 Waltipe
Energy CM1arye (SlkWMampl 00]648 00]049 00)9]1 4D]9Ji~ 0.3% 0.3"A
lamp CM1erga (3/LemNMOnlnl 924 9,24 024 924
250 Wattage '
Energy Cnerga (UMNnAemp) OOJ549 00]949 00]5]1 0.0]9]1 03% 03%
lamp CM1arge (b'LemplMOnln) 094 9.94 9.94 994
Trettc LODU01
EnlrgY Cnerpe (S/kWft) 0.11]50 0.11]10 011])5 c.11]39 02% 02%
LUalOm0r Cnarye (S/day) 051500 0.515CO 051600 051500
eaon Sy9tem
Imp
~
E rgy Chfllpe (ShVm) 01B1b) 0.132W 0.1021fi 0.13342 0.3% 04%
Cus'.omer Charge (Skey) OY800 0]2900 0.12800 052800
W?R
FiaeO Energy Che•BB SIDencelMOnm ]040 A4 J04018G ]454184 ]654184 02K 02%
Cuslomar CM10pe SlMOnln 1)29 V,20 tJ29 1J 29
InsperLw Charge-LOeNmlk4onm 1'4.80 1286 12W :2 EO
Tlaeo-Pnase Service-UOxy 003 003 O.OJ OOJ
Inlta4zatlan of Service Lnarge 679 6]P 619 6.JB
'Rates were calwlalatl using B1e M9rr1131, 2011 DVrtt permnta0e o! 2] 6961w mntperisOn pumOSes.
P-213
Table of Contends
electric Rates and Tariffs
SMALL COMMERCIAL
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE)
LARGE COMMERCIAL
STREET LIGHTING
TRAFFIC CONTROL
OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING
IRRIGATION SYS"1'EMS
WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY
NET ENERGY METERING
SERVICE ESTABLISIiMENT CHARGE
ELECTRIC CHARGES AND FF,ES SCHEDULE
1
3
6
10
14
17
18
20
21
23
25
26
P-214
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIUNICIFA[. UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARffFS
SMALL COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase general service including lighting and power
Customers, except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand, in the opinion
of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any three (3)
months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under this
Schedule. Effective with [he date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this
Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate
Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener> Char c $/kWh/Meter/Month
Summer Current Rate Schedule is
Winter available at
www. Ci tyofRC. u s/RCM U
Customer Char e- $/Meter/Da 0.728
"Three Phase Service - $/Da 0.032
'fhe energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions.
Summer and Winter Seasons are defined as follows:
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June I" and continue until
12:00 a.lil. on October I" of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October 1'" of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June ls` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (])standard voltage.
3. Three-Phase Service. Where the Utility provides three-phase service, the billing
will be increased by the amount shown in the Rates section above.
4, Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
2 Ettu'ti~c Uate: April I, 201 I
P-215
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES &'rARIrFS
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming
service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued,. will be
required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
5. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
6. Installation of Demand Meters.
Where a Customer's usage exceeds an average of 4,500 kWh per month in the
preceding 12-month period, the Utility may, at its sole option, install a demand
Meter on the account at flte CJtility's expense.
7. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [k W], etc.).
8. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
9. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
]0. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to eseablish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
3 EtTeca~e ome: nprcl i, zo I i
P-216
CITY OF RA1.'CFIO CIiCAh10NGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELLCiRIC RA iES & TARIFFS
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers
whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected
to register, about 20 kW and below 200 kW. The Customer whose monthly Maximum
Demand, in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to reach 200 kW or has reached 200
kW for any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for
service under this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's
account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. PulKher, any Customer
served under this Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 20 kW or
less for twelve (12} consecutive months is eligible for service under another applicable
Rate Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month
Non TOU Pricin O Lion
Summer Season
Winter Season Current Rate Schedule is
TOU Pricin O tion available at
Summer Season-On-Peak www.CityotRC.us/RCMU
Mid-Peak
Off-Peak
Winter Season -Mid-Peak
Off-Peak
Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 133.19 J
Demand Char e - $/kW of Billin Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 12.25 _
Time Related -Non TOU Summer i 19.26
Time Related - TOU Summer - On-Peak 16.88
Sunm~er-Off-Peak 5.16
TOU O tion Meter Char e - $/Meter/Month RTEM 93.49
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
L-ffecove Date: April I. 2011
P-217
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
D. Special Conditions.
Time periods are defined as follows
On-Peak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Oft-Peak: All other hours.
Flolidays are New Year's Day (January I), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (.luly 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November ll),
Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
2~).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, the following Monday will be
recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on .tune 1" and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October I't of each year. The Winter Season shall connnence at
12:00 a.m. on October I~` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1st of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
pwposes.
RTEM Metering. Customers may elect a Real Time Energy Metering (RTEM)
meter and shall pay the monthly charges, as indicated in the Rates section of this
Rate Schedule.
Voltage.
Service will he supplied at one (I) standard voltage.
4. Billing Demand.
The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand; determined to
the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the following billing
components. 1'he Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing
period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum
Demand recorded during (or established tor) the monthly billing period.
However, when the Utility determines the Custaner's Meter will record little or
no energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not
recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (I t) months, the Facilities
Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent
(50%) of the Customer's Connected Load.
Eftecnve Dute: April I, 201 I
P-278
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTI LI'rY
ELECTRIC RM~ES & TARIFFS
5. Maximum Demand.
The Maximwn Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum average
kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments; during any 15-minute
metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than the
diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section
designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject
to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used.
6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service
within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued will be required to
pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
7. Customer-Owned Electrical Crenerating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliarylemergency generating
fac i I hies.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the achlal
billing determinants (kilowatt hours (kWh], demand [kW], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
The rates above are subject [o an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
I I. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs; renewable energy resources. research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
Ea'enive Date'. April 1, 20I I
P-219
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
6LGCTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
MEDIUM COMMERCIAL (TIME-OF-USE)
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service including lighting and power Customers
whose monthly Maximum Demand registers, or in the opinion of the Utility is expected
to register 200 kW through 500 kW. The customer whose monthly Maximum Demand,
in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 500 kW or has exceeded 500 kW for
any three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service
under this Schedule and effective with the date of ineligibility, such Customer's account
shall be transferred to Large Commercial. Further; any Customer served under this
Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered below 200 kW foe twelve
(12) consecutive months is ineligible far service under this Rate Schedule, and shall be
transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule.
B. Ten'itory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Ener Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month
Smnmer Season - On-Peak
Mid-Peak i Current Rate Schedule is
Off-Peak available at
WinterSeason-Mid-Peak www.CituofRC.us/RCMU
Off-Peak
Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 469.00
Demand Char e-$/kW ofBillin Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 13.24
Time Related
Summer Season - On-Peak 14.67
Mid-Peak 3.49
Power Factor Adjustment - $/KVA 0,27
1. The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions.
'l'ime periods are defined as follows:
On-Ptak: Noon to 6:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peale 8:00 a.m.to noon and 6:00 p.m,to 11:00 p.m.sunvner weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Off-Peak: All other howl
ElTzciive Date: April 1, 201 I
P-220
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL U"rI1,ITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
Holidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (.iuly 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November 11),
Thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
25).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday; the following Monday will be
recognized as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Smnmer Season shall commence at ]2:00 a.m. on June I~` and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October I" of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
] 2:00 a.m. on October I" of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June Is` of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes.
2. Voltage.
Service will be supplied atone (1) standard voltage.
3. Billing Demand.
1'he Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to
the nearest kW. The Demand Charge shall include the follDwing billing
components. The Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing
period. The Facilities Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum
Demand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period.
However, when the Utility determines the Customer's Meter will record little or
Ito energy use for extended periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not
recorded a Maximum Demand in the preceding eleven (I I) months, the Facilities
Related Component of the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent
(50%) of the Customer's Connected Load.
Maximnm Demand.
Maximum Demand shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off-Peak
periods. The Maximum Demand in any month shall be the measured maximum
average kilowatt input, indicated or recorded by instruments, during any 15-
minute metered interval in the month, but, where applicable, shall not be less than
the diversified resistance welder load computed in accordance with the section
designated Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject
to violent fluctuations, a 5-minute interval Wray be used.
~. Power Factor Adjustment.
Effective Date: April I, 2011
P-227
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
fLGC'IRIC RATES & TARIFFS
The Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount
shown in [he Rates section above for service metered and delivered at the
applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand
imposed by the Utility.
The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximum average
kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any I S minute interval
in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A device will
be installed on each kilovar meter to prevent reverse operation of the meter.
6. Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjustments will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer resuming service
within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued will be required to
pay all charges which would have been billed if service had not been
discontinued.
7. Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer [o test the auxiliary/emergency generating
fac i I hies.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges at'e calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kW], kilovar [kVa], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP).
The rates above are subject to an adjusunent as provided in Rule 12; Section F.
11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects. and services for low-income electricity customers.
EO~ectivc Dace'. April 1, 201 I
P-222
CITY OF RAttCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES R TARIFFS
LARGE COMMERCIAL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to general services including lighting and power Customers. This Schedulc is
applicable to and mandatory for al] Customers whose monthly Maximun Demand, in the
opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 500 kW or has exceeded 500 kW in any three
(3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months. Any existing Customer on this
Schedule whose monthly Maximum Demand has registered 500 kW or less for twelve
(l2) consecutive months is ineligible for service under this Schedule and shall be
transferred to another applicable Rate Schedule. Service under this Schedulc is subject to
Meter availability.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
liner Char e - $/kWh/Meter/Month
Summcr Season- On-Peak t Rate Schedule is
C
Mid-Peak urren
available a[
Off-Peak N,N,N, CityofRC
us/RCMU
Winter Season - Mid-Peak .
Off-Peak
Customer Char e - $/Meter/Month 573.02
Demand Charge - $/kW of Billing
Demand/Meter/Month
Facilities Related 12.62
Time Related
Summer Season - On-Peak 18.22
Mid-Peak 5.13
Power Factor Ad'ustment - $/K VA 0.27
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy pw'chases.
1 ~ Eltectivc Dntr. April I, 201 I
P-223
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
D. Special Conditions.
'time periods are defined as follows
On-Peak: Noon to G:00 p.m. summer weekdays except holidays.
Mid-Peak: 8:00 a.m. to noon and 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. summer weekdays
except holidays.
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. winter weekdays except holidays.
Off-Peak: All other hours.
I-tolidays are New Year's Day (January 1), Washington's Birthday (third Monday
in February), Memorial Day (last Monday in May), Independence Day (July 4),
Labor Day (first Monday in September), Veteran's Day (November Il),
"thanksgiving Day (fourth Thursday in November), and Christmas (December
25).
When any holiday listed above falls on Sunday, [he following Monday will be
recogni2ed as an off-peak period. No change will be made for holidays falling on
Saturday.
The Summer Season shall commence at 12:00 a.m. on June Is` and continue until
12:00 a.m. on October I~` of each year. The Winter Season shall commence at
12:00 a.m. on October ls` of each year and continue until 12:00 a.m. on June 1St of
the following year. A pro rata computation will be made for seasonal billing
purposes..
2. Voltage.
Service will be supplied atone standard voltage.
3. Maximum Demand.
Maximum Demands shall be established for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Off=
Peak periods. The Maximum Demand for each period shall be the measured
maximum average Kilowatt input indicated or recorded by instruments, during any
15-minute metered interval, but, where applicable, not less than the diversified
resistance. welder load computed in accordance with the section designated
Welder Service in Rule 2. Where the demand is intermittent or subject to violent
fluctuations, a 5-minute interval may be used.
4. Billing Demand.
The Billing Demand shall be the kilowatts of Maximum Demand, determined to
the nearest kW. The Uemand Charge shall include the following billing
components. "I'he Time Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of
Maximum Uemand recorded during (or established for) the monthly billing period
for each of the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and Oft-Peak Time Periods. The Facilities
Related Component shall be for the kilowatts of Maximum Demand recorded
during (or established for) the monthly billing period. However, when the Utility
I 1 Effective Date: April 1, 20! I
P-224
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MINICIPAL UTILrY
ELECTRIC RATL-S & TARIFFS
determines the Customer's Meter will record little or no energy use for extended
periods of time or when the Customer's Meter has not recorded a Maximum
Demand in the preceding eleven (1 1) months, the Facilities Related Component of
the Demand Charge may be established at fifty percent (50%) of the Customer's
Connected Load. Separate Demand Charge(s) for the On-Peak, Mid-Peak, and
Off-Peak Time Periods shall be established for each montllly billing period. The
Demand Charge for each time period shall be based on the Maximum Demand for
that time period occurring during the respective monthly billing period.
5. Power Factor Adjustment.
The Customer's bill will be increased each month for power factor by the amount
shown in the Rates section above for service metered and delivered al the
applicable voltage level, based on the per kilovar of maximum reactive demand
imposed by the Utility.
The maximum reactive demand shall be the highest measured maximwn average
kilovar demand indicated or recorded by metering during any 15 minute metered
interval in the month. The kilovars shall be determined to the nearest unit. A
device will be installed on each kilovar Meter to prevent reverse operation of the
Meter.
Temporary Discontinuance of Service.
Where the use of energy is seasonal or intermittent, no adjusmtents will be made
for a temporary discontinuance of service. Any Customer, prior to resuming
service within twelve (12) months after such service was discontinued, will be
required to pay all charges which would have been billed if service Ilad not been
discontinued.
Customer-Owned Electrical Generating Facilities.
Upon written approval by the Utility, momentary parallel operation may be
permitted to allow the Customer to test the auxiliary/emergency generating
facilities.
8. Contracts.
An initial three-year facilities contract may be required where Applicant requires
new or added serving capacity exceeding 2;000 kVA.
9. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applying the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours [kWh], demand [kWJ, kilovar [kVaJ, etc.).
10. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
12, Ettecnvo Hate: April I, 2011
P-225
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL U'ilLl't'Y
GLECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
1 I . Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP').
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section P.
12. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and detnonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
1 3 EfYe°tive D21e_ April I, 201 I
P-226
CFTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATE$ & TARIFFS
STREET LIGHTING
A, Applicability.
Applicable to meter for the lighting of streets, and publicly-owned and publicly-operated
automobile parking lots which are opened to the general public where the City owns and
maintains the street lighting equipment and associated facilities included under this Schedule.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates
High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps -All Night Service
Lam Watta a Initial Lumens $/Lam !Month
Current Rate Schedule is
150 16,000 available at
250 27,500 www.Cit ofRC.us/RCMU
L 1'he energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
The Applicant shall install streetlights that will be served by the Utility. These
streetlights must be installed in accordance with the Utility's specifications and
the developer will deed such facilities to the City.
2. Requirements and Restrictions.
a. The .Applicant for street light service shall specify the type of service,
lamp size, and (ocation of street lights.
b. Service shall not be furnished under this Schedule where location,
mounting height, and/or other considerations are unacceptable to the
iJtility.
c. The installation of street lighting equipment and facilities hereunder is
contingent upon the utility obtaining easements, and rights of way, as may
be required, satisfactory to the Utility for the required poles, lines,
equipment, and facilities.
d. Should the Applicant not commence using the street liehting in a bona fide
manner within ninety (90) days after date of completion and installation of
14 Effective Date: April I,?OU
P-227
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATFS & TARIFFS
a street light or street lighting system requested by the Applicant, the
Utility will bill, and the Applicant shall pay, the applicable lamp
charges(s).
Nours of Service.
Under the Utility's standard all night operating schedule, approximately
4,140 hours of service per year will be furnished.
Maintenance.
The Utility shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in maintaining its
sweet light facilities or Utility-owned attachments thereto. Where the
Utility experiences, or expects to experience; maintenance costs exceeding
its normal maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to,
vandalism, the Utility may require the customer to pay the excess
maintenance expense.
Liability of the Utility.
The Utility shall not, by taking action pursuant [o its tariffs; be liable for
any loss; damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may result, or be
claimed to result, therefrom.
6. Removal, Relocation or Modification of Facilities.
Where street lighting service and facilities are ordered removed by a customer,
the customer shall pay to the Utility a nonrefundable amount equal to the total
estimated cost installed less any Customer contribution, plus the estimated cost of
removal less the estimated net salvage value of the facilities.
Where street lighting service and facilities were ordered removed by a Customer
and such service and facilities, or their equivalent are ordered reinstalled within
thirty-six (36) months from the date of the order to remove, the Customer shall
pay to the Utility in advance oPreinstallation anonrefundable amount equal to the
cost of removal of the prior facilities and the estimated cost of such reinstallation.
Where street lighting facilities are ordered modified and /or relocated by a
Customer, the Customer shall pay to the Utility, in advance of such modification
and/or relocation, a nonrefundable amount equal to the estimated cost of such
modification and/or relocation. "Phis includes facilities that now serve street light
load only, but that may have been installed originally to serve other than street
light load.
Utility-owned facilities removed or installed remain the sole property of the
Utility.
Billing Calculation
I j ERective De[c April 1, 2011
P-228
CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UT1LI1'Y
ELECTRIC RATES &'fA RIFFS
8.
10.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above.
Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAF).
7~he rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule l2, Section P.
State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85"/0 of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
16
Efrective Oate: April I,?011
P-229
CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAMONC,A MU1dICIPAL UTI LI'fY
ELECTRIC RATES & i'n RIPFS
TRAFFIC CONTROL
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single and three-phase service 1'or traffic directional signs or traffic signal
systems located on streets, highways and other public thoroughfares and to railway
crossing and track signals; for public thoroughfare lighting that is utilized twenty-four
(24) hours per day or is not controlled by switching equipment, such as tunnel or
underpass lighting; and, to public authorities fur the illumination of bus stop shelters
located in the dedicated road right-of-way where such service is combined with other
traffic control service as defined above.
B. Territory.
The entire territory served.
C. Rates.
$/Traffic Signal/Month Current Rate Schedule is
available at
www.CitvofRC.us/RCMU
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the wmrent State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
1. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (I) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or,
at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase.
2. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above.
3. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section B.
4. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP).
"fhe rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule I2, Section F.
5. State Mandated Public Pw~pose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of elech~ic retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
I'] F.ITeclive Uate: April I,.01 I
P-230
CI'T'Y Of RANCHO CI,ICAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES k'I'ARIPPS
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
$ Ef:ective Date: April I, 201 t
P-231
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RA"I~ES & TARIFFS
OUTDOOR AREA LIGHTING
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single-phase service for metered outdoor area lighting load, controlled for
dusk to dawn operation and used For purposes other than street and highway lighting such
as, but not limited to parking lots, pedestrian walkways, billboards, building exteriors,
security, sports and recreation areas, monuments, decorative areas, and bus shelters.
B. Territory.
Within the entire ten~itnry served.
C. Rates.
Customer
it Rate Schedule is
available at
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions
Voltage.
Service will be provided at one (1) standard voltage.
2. Threc-Phase Service.
Where, in the sole opinion of the Utility, it is impractical to provide single-phase
service under this Schedule; three-phase service will be provided.
3. Separate Point of Delivery.
When requested by the Applicant or Customer, and agreed upon by the Utility; an
additional Point of Delivery may be provided, separate from any other Point of
Delivery provided under any other applicable Rate Schedule. Customers so
served shall not be permitted fo have an electrical interconnection beyond the
Utility's Point of Delivery between the separately metered loads except upon
written approval of the Utility.
19 Ea'wnve Dme: Aprii 1,2011
P-232
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL U"I"ILITY
EL[CTRIC' RnTE3 & T'ARIFF'S
A change from this Schedule to any other Ra[e Schedule will be permitted if the
additional Point of Delivery is removed. Any such removal shall be at the
Customer's expense.
Any rearrangement of facilities required to provide the additional Point of
Delivery shal I be at the expense of the requesting Applicant or Customer.
4. Controlled Operation.
Service under this Schedule requires the control oflanips in a manner acceptable
to the Utility so that lamps will not be lighted daily from dawn to dusk. Customer
shall install, own, operate, and maintain the control device. The Utility shall have
the right to periodically inspect the control device to ensure its correct operation
and maintenance.
5. Distribution Line Extension.
Distribution Line Extensions to reach an outdoor area light or area lighting system
shall be in accordance with Rule I5.
6. Services.
Services shall be installed and maintained as provided itt Rule 16.
7. Incidental Loads.
Incidental, non-lighting loads may be served under this Schedule only where such
Connected Loads do not exceed fifteen percent (IS) of the Customer's total
Connected Load. Incidental Loads must also be controlled for dusk to dawn
operation exclusively.
8. Billing Calculation.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rates and conditions above. The
charges are calculated by applyiltg the Rate Charges when applicable to the actual
billing determinants (kilowatt hours kWh], demand [k W], etc.).
9. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
10. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP).
The rates above are subject to an adjusument as provided in Rule 12; Section F.
11. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
ZQ Effective Dale' April 1, 201 I
P-233
CITY OF RANCIiO COCA MONGA MIJNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
2 i E'R'ecGve Dale: April I, 2011
P-234
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1v1lNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS
A. Applicability.
Applicable where the Utility determines that 100% of the customer's electrical usage is
for limited irrigation service except for the Customer whose monthly Maximum Demand,
in the opinion of the Utility, is expected to exceed 20 kW or has exceeded 20 kW in any
three (3) months during the preceding twelve (12) months is ineligible for service under
this Schedule. Effective with the date of ineligibility of any Customer served under this
Schedule. the Customer's account shall be transferred to another applicable Rate
Schedule.
B. Territory.
The entire territory served.
C. Rates.
System/Month Current Rale Schedu
available at
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the culTent State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Condition
1. Voltage.
Service will be supplied at one (1) standard voltage not in excess of 240 volts or,
at the option of the Utility, at 240/480 volts, three wire, single-phase.
2. Billing Calculatiat.
A Customer's bill is calculated according to the rate and conditions above.
;. Power Cost Adjusunent Factor (PCAF).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
4. Change of Law Adjusunent Factor (CLAP).
The rate above is subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
5. State Mandated Public Purpose Programs Charge.
State law requires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
22 Eflettive Daw~. April I, 2011
P-235
CI'CY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC Rn7"ES & TARIFFS
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
2 j Efl~ective Dz~e'. April I, 201 I
P-236
CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA YIU4ICIPAL U'fI LITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY
A. Applicability.
Applicable to single-phase service for wireless technology industries that require electric
service to operate radio repeaters or similar devices (wireless communication devices)
that are mounted on existing City facilities, or other facilities approved by the Utility and
are unmetered. This Schedule excludes Wi-Fi devices on "looped" (served by 120/240
volts) streetlight facilities. Customers must execute an application/conu•act with the
Utility for service under this Schedule, and muse execute an applicable agreement when
devices are attached to City facilities. The Irionthly kilowatt-hour (kWh) usage of each
device shall not exceed 500 kWh. Effective with the date oi' ineligibility of any Customer
served under this Schedule, the Customer's account shall be transferred to another
applicable Rate Schedule. If the Customer's account cannot be transferred to another
applicable Rate Schedule, the account will be closed, the Utility's service will be
removed and the Customer must remove its device and equipment form the applicable
City facility.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
Fixed Energy Charge - $/Device/Month Current Rate Schedule is available at
www.Cit olRC.us/RCMU
Customer Char e - $/Month 17.29
Ins ection Char e - $/Device/Month 12.60
Three-Phase Service - $/Da 0.03
Initialization of Service Charge -One-time
char e
6.7~
The energy charge is calculated each month by using the current State Department
of Water Resources (DWR) percentage. This percentage will be adjusted monthly
to reflect actual energy purchases.
D. Special Conditions.
I. Contract. An approved City contract is required for service under this Rate
Schedule.
2. Voltage. Service will be supplied at one (I) standard voltage not in excess of 240
voles.
3. Three-Phase Service. Where the Utility provides three-phase service, the billing
will be increased by the amount shown in the Rates section above.
4. Maximum Wattage. The maximum wattslconnected load/name plate is 74( watts.
2Q Frfective Dare: April I, 201 I
P-237
CI'iY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTn~riY
EI_ECrRIC RA'rFS & "I'AR1FF5
5. htstallation. The device(s) shall be installed on City facilities or other facilities
approved by the Utility. When the devices are installed on City facilities, the
installation and removal of such device(s) will be performed by the Customer, and
at the Customer's expense. Device installation shall not be performed under this
Rate Schedule, where location, mounting height, and/or other considerations are
not acceptable to the Utility. Unless approved by the Utility, all wireless
communication devices must be visible to the Utility.
7. Modification of Facilities. No modifications can be made to the Customer-owned
wireless communications devices unless approved by the Utility. Where the
Customer requests a modification of City facilities, and such modifications are
acceptable to the City, the City will perform the requested modifications at the
Customer's expense.
8. Maintenance. The Utility shall exercise reasonable care and diligence in
maintaining its facilities. Upon installation of the device(s), where the Utility
experiences, or expects to experience, maintenance costs exceeding its normal
maintenance expense resulting from, but not limited to, vandalism, the Utility
may require the Customer to pay the excess maintenance expense.
9. Liability of the Utility. The Utility shall not, by taking action pursuant to its
tariffs, be liable for any loss, damage, or injury, established or alleged, which may
result, or be claimed [o result, there from.
10. Initialization of Service Charge. A one-time charge, as shown in the Rates
section of this Rate Schedule, is applied to each service account provided service
under this Rate Schedule to recover the costs of a lock and spare fuse which are
required with the initialization of service.
1 1. Power Cost Adjustment Factor (PCAF).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section E.
12. Change of Law Adjustment Factor (CLAP).
The rates above are subject to an adjustment as provided in Rule 12, Section F.
13. State Mandated Public Pwpose Programs Charge.
State law rcyuires all California electric utilities to establish a public purpose
programs charge of 2.85% of electric retail revenues to fund qualifying energy
efficiency programs, renewable energy resources, research and demonstration
projects, and services for low-income electricity customers.
25 Enwtive Dire: April I, 201 I
P-238
CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMGNGA \1UNICIFAL UTILITY
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
NET ENERGY METERING
A. Applicability
Applicable to a customer who operates a solar generating facility that is located on the
customer's premises with a capacity of not more than I MW that is interconnected and
operates in parallel with the City's electric system, intended primarily to offset part or a(I
of the customer's own electrical requirements, and meets all the applicable safety and
performance standards. "['his Schedule shall be closed to new customers once the
combined nameplate rated generating capacity, for all customers served under this
Schedule exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the City's peak demand.
B. Territory
The entire territory served.
C. Rates
As determined in each billing period, when a customer consumes more energy
than generated at the premises, the net consumed energy will be used in the
calculation of all applicable energy charges, calculated by multiplying the net
amount consumed by the applicable energy rate components of the customer's
OAT.
2. As determined in each billing period, when a customer generates more energy
than is consumed by the customer, the net kilowatt-hours of production will be
carried forward into the next billing period.
3. Customers who are Net Surplus Electricity producers may elect to either carry
over annual Net Surplus Energy production (in kilowatt hours) as a credit that will
be applied to kilowatt hours subsequently supplied to Customer by RCMU or
Customer may elect to receive payment for annual Net Surplus Electricity
production and be compensated fa' each kilowatt-hour of Net Surplus Electricity
production at a rate equivalent to the highest hourly rate that was charged for
consumption in their OAT dw'ing the year prior to the Customer's Annual Billing
Date.
U. Special Condition
1. An executed Net Energy Metering and Generating facility Interconnection
Agreement is required prior to receiving service under this Schedule.
?. Metering Requirements - It' the customer's existing meter is not. capable of
measuring the flow of energy in two directions, an appropriate meter shall be
provided at the expense of the customer. The City may elect to install an
additional meter or meters, at the City's expense to provide the information
necessary to accurately bill or credit the customer.
2( ElRnive Date: April I, 201 I
P-239
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA h1UMCIPAI. UTILITY
ELECTRIC RAPES °~ TARIFFS
3. Billing
a. City shall provide all customers served under this Schedule with net energy
consumption information and/or net energy export information with each
monthly bill.
b. Customers served under this Schedule shall pay both energy and non-energy
charges on a monthly basis, in accordance with the customers OAT except as
otherwise allowed by State law. The value of net energy production will be
used to offset only energy related charges in subsequent billing periods.
4. Definitions
a. Net energy metering measures the difference between the electricity supplied
through the electric grid and the electricity generated on the customer's
premises and fed back to the electric grid.
b. Otherwise Applicable Tariff (OAT) is the customer's regularly filed rate
schedule under which service is rendered.
c. Net Surplus Electricity is the electricity generated by an eligible customer-
generator measured in kilowatt horn's over a 12-month period that exceeds the
amount of electricity consumed by that eligible customer-generator.
~'~ EI'ren rce Dade: April I, 20I I
P-240
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY
GLGCTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT CHARGE
A. Applicability.
Applicable to General Service and Domestic Service customers.
B. Territory.
Within the entire territory served.
C. Rates.
For each establishment of electric service .................................... $15.00
D. Special Conditions
l . The service establishment charge provided for herein is in addition to the charges
calculated in accordance with the applicable schedule and may be made each time an
account is established. As used herein, establishment means each time an account is
opened, including a turn on of electric service or a change of name which requires a
meter reading.
2. In case the customer requests that electric service be established on the day of his
request or outside of regular hours; an additional charge of $ I I.00 may be made.
2$ Effective Dale', April I, 201 I
P-241
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY'
ELECTRIC RATES & TARIFFS
Electric Fees and Charges Schedule
Applicability
Applicable to all classes of service as provided in accordance with the Electric Rules and
Regulations. Does not supersede any fees and charges listed in the « des which are not included
on this schedule.
Description
Minimum Deposit
Minimum lleposiUReconnection
Service "turn-on Charge
Fee Amount
Greater of twice estimated average
monthly bill or $100
Greater of three times the estimated
average monthly bill or $100
$20 next day
$35 same day
$50 after hours
Special Appointment Turn-On Charge added to applicable $10
fee (Does not apply to the normal 4-hour window
appointment)
Return Check Charge
Fund Verification Fee
Trip charge fur additional field visits (cut-off for non
payment, etc.)
Meter TesUSecond Request Within One Year Period
Re-Read/second request within six months
Appointment based meter reads
Monthly rental of Remote Metering to resolve access issues
Temporary Turn On or Turn Off of electric service for
repair (normal working hours) lirst aggregate hour is free
Temporary Turn On or `('urn Off of electric service for
repair (after normal hours)
Cost to investigate energy diversion
Generating Facility Interconnection Plan Check and
Inspection Rate
In accordance with City of Rancho
Cucamonga Ordinance
$5.00
$15.00
$100 paid in advance (if error is
found, fee will be refunded)
$25 (if error is found fee will be.
refunded)
$25
$2.50 permonth
$95 per hour or faction thereof
$130 per hour or factimt thereof
Higher of $150 plus material or time
and material
$150 per hour
29 Effective Daic; April I, 2011
P-242
STAFF REPORT
PLANN W G DEPARTbSENT ~a„~_y~~
RANCHO
Date: April 20, 2011 ~;UCAMONGA
To: Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner
Subject: Approval to appropriate $187,330 into account number 1016301-5300 (Community
Development Technical Services Fund 016) and approval to execute a Professional
Services Agreement (CO# 2011-041) with Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) not to
exceed $187,330 for the preparation of a comprehensive update to the Development
Code (Title 17) and required environmental assessment in accordance with Request for
Qualifications No. 10/11-204.
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the
Professional Services Agreement (CO# 2011-041) with Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) for the
preparation of a comprehensive update to the Development Code and required environmental
assessment in accordance with Request for Qualifications No. 10/11-204.
Background: The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its first Development Code in 1983. Since
the adoption, numerous amendments have been adopted in response to changing development
patterns, State mandates, and developer requests. However, the core elements of the 1983
document remain intact. The current Development Code was effective in guiding the City during its
phases of rapid growth; however, it has not been updated to address the issues that the City has
begun to face as a mature City.
When the Development Code was first adopted, the City was predominantly vacant with most
development applications consisting of large tracts of land with hundreds of residential units or large
distribution warehouse complexes. Today, the City is largely being developed with land use
applications proposing smaller residential subdivisions or more modest commercial and industrial
development. As a result, residents and business owners have expressed concerns about infill
compatibility, preservation of existing development (commercial and residential), and the lack of
clarity in the current Development Code.
On January 12,, 2011, the Council included in its goals to update the Development Code and
directed staff to begin the process of finding a consultant to work with the City. On February 8,
2011, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ), No. 10/11-204, was sent to 20 consulting firms (Exhibit
A). On March 10, 2011, the City received responses from four (4) firms: LSA, The Planning
Center, Hogle-Ireland, and PMC.
An evaluation committee consisting of staff from the Community Development and the City
Attorney's office reviewed the proposals and conducted interviews with all four consultants on
March 24, 2011. As a result of the interview process and final score, the Committee had
determined two firms, Hogle-Ireland, and PMC (Exhibit B), were the most highly qualified to
complete the project. At that time, the cost proposals were unsealed and reviewed. On
March 28, 2011, a request for a Best and Final Offer (BAFO) was made to both firms. During this
time, staff conducted three reference checks for both firms, as well as evaluated past development
code work completed by the firms in other cities. After reviewing the firm's references, past work
and BAFO's, the evaluation committee selected PMC as the most responsive, responsible firm for
the project.
P-243
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 20, 2011
Page 3
The evaluation committee ultimately chose PMC for the following reasons:
1. Customized approach -PMC has reviewed our existing Development Code but presents no
"prepackaged" solutions. They have solid experience in code writing with strong tools based
on that experience, but are able and willing to tailor the Development Code to our needs.
2. "Living document" concept -PMC recognizes that development codes are not static
documents; they are constantly being reviewed and revised to meet the needs of the
communities they serve. They have a clear strategy for creating a document that is both easy
to read and easy to update later in the future.
3. Thorough and complete proposal - PMC's proposal best reflected the City's RFQ by including
all required elements and without making significant assumptions that affected the intent of
the Development Code Update.
4. Solid project timeline -PMC understands the timeline and the desire to have the
Development Code adopted, by Council in April 2012. PMC is appreciative of the timeline
because it keeps the project focused.
5. Team cohesiveness and energy -During the interview process, the project team from PMC
was the most cohesive group with dynamic energy and strong enthusiasm for the project.
They were clearly ready to "hit the ground running."
6. High quality graphics - In reviewing development codes PMC has written for other cities, one
of the traits that stood out was the use of a variety of high quality graphics. Two-dimensional,
three-dimensional, and color photographs were used in several samples to illustrate
definitions, key concepts, and design standards.
The Planning Department has dedicated one staff member, Jennifer Nakamura, full time to this
project to ensure its timely and successful completion. Ms. Nakamura will be working very closely
with PMC in every aspect of the project to make certain that the updated Development Code meets
the City's needs. In addition, we have developed an in-house team consisting of 18 members from
the Planning, Building and Safety, Code Enforcement, Engineering, Fire, and Redevelopment
Departments and the City Attorney to provide feedback and support.
The contract amount is not to exceed $187,330, including a 10% contingency if additional services
are necessary, and the funding is supported by the Community Development Technical Services
Fund 016.
Respectfully submitted,
~.~,~
Jam R. Tro of r~, AICP
Y
Planning Director
JRT:JN/ge
P-244
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2010-00571 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 20,.2011
Page 4
Attachments: Exhibit A - Request For Proposal/Qualifications (RFP/RFQ)
Exhibit B - Consolidated Evaluation Sheet (From the Evaluation Committee,
dated March 24, 2011)
Exhibit C - PMC Proposal
Exhibit D - Professional Services Agreement (Distributed Under Separate Cover)
_ hlrtyor 1_. Derrws MICH,IEL • Mnynr Pro,7cn~ Saea Srnyja~~S>
rr (;buncilA4r.~ni~er; Wn.tinht 1. A1.P.XANDER, CxiicK 13nQucr, llinnrf. Wi r.. .
~y~ t ~. • Ci•T h9a:rager J~c7< Lnh~. AIC:P
'~~j i~S
~J ~ THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~AAICHO
~UCAMONGA
February 8, 2011
Ladies and Gentlemen:
You aze invited to submit a response to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's (hereinafter the "City") Request
for Qualifications ("RFQ") in association with the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (hereinafter
"Planning") for Development Code Consulting Services (hereinafter "DC Consulting Services") in
accordance with the minimum Scope of Work ("SOW") and Specification requirements indicated herein.
You may respond by mail no later than March 10, 2011, by 5:00 P.M. Please send your RFQ
response to the Purchasing Division, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. RFQ
responses must be SEALED and clearly marked as follows on the outside of envelope or packaging
container "RFQ #10/11-204 Development Code Consultant". Late responses will not be accepted and
will be returned unopened. INCLUDE ONE SIGNED ORIGINAL AND TEN (10) COPIES FOR
REVIEW. In the interest of remaining environmentally friendly and cost effective, please use double
sided printing and refrain from utilizing three-ring binders. The following binding methods aze
acceptable: Loose sheets fastened with a binder clip, stapled, or a three-hole folder with fasteners.
This solicitation does not commit the City to award a Contract, pay any costs incurred in the preparation
of the response, or to procure or Contract for the articles of goods or services. The City reserves the right
to accept or reject any or all RFQ responses or portions thereof and to' cancel in part or in its entirety this
response if it is in the best interest of the City to do so.
At pre-bid meeting is scheduled for February 16, 2011, at 2:00 P.M. Anyone having questions regazding
this RFQ may address them in writing and fax or email them to Keri Hinojos, CPPB; Senior Buyer,
Acting Purchasing Manager, at (909) 477-2700, ext. 2501, keri.hinoios a citvorc.us prior to 5:00 P.M.,
Febmary 22, 20] 1. Unless the question is in writing, it will not be considered.
Sincerely,
Keri Hinojos, CPPB
Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager
Attachment
EXHIBIT ~-
~_ ,... ., ~ ~. ~,._, _ „ , . ,.. _.., ,....., . , , ,.......,_ .,.,.. _ , ,n.. , .., ,,,,... ,.,
P-246
TATS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
P-247
This RF res Dose has been submitted b ~:
Company Name: Address:
(Street, Su. # Ciry, State, Zip)
Con[oc[ Name:
Telephone #:
Fax #:
E-mail address:
Request for Qualifications "RFQ" #10/I1-204
Development Code Consulting Services
Submit Request for Qualification response to:
~ Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager, CPPB
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Physical Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 307
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Your submittal shall lie delivered in an envelope clearly marked:
"RFQ" # ] 0/11-204
Development Code Consulting Services"
Submittals Due: March 10, 2011, by 5:00 n.m.
Direct Questions to:
d Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager
E-mail: keri.hinoiosCc~citvofrc.us
Fax #: (909) 919-2610
Questions Due: February 22, 201.1, by 5:00 a.m.
NOTICE
From the issuance date of this Request for Qualifications until a Qualified Vendors list is
identified and said list is publicized, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with any
City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews,
demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior
Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager, or Ruth Cain, CPPB, Buyer H, the designated
representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
-2-
P-248
T'ARTICIPA770N CLAUSE
Participation Clause:
It is hereby understood that other governmental entities, such as cities, counties, and
special/school districts may utilize this RFQ response at their option for equipment or services at
the RFQ response price for a period of days. Said entities shall have the option to
participate in any awazd made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy-back awazds will
be made independently by each agency, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not an agent,
partner or representative of these agencies and is not ob]igated or liable for any action of debts
that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public
agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments to the Vendor.
Successful Vendor will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies,
please specify. YES NO
A[VTICIPATED SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
:EVENT DATE
Post?Re uest foi•~Qualification ~°:'Februa '8', 20~i 1
Pre-Bid7VIeehn `.' `.Febtua 18, 201 L; aY:2:00;P.Ivf.:
Questions -Dne :' - Febtiia : 22, ~b SOO:P:.M.
Addendum~Issued _ -='~ ~ ~"'?Februa".' 28, 20:11.
rRPQ tRes once Due Date March 1';0, 2011., b ' 5:00 P:M
Vendor Short List Selechiiu~' ~ ° ~- ~' TBD OriG ifnecessary)`
Oral;Presentations6lnterviews I TBD;3(Onl if recess
A•ntici `'afed. AwardDate ~ .;
' ' TBD`
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or
responsibility to Vendor.)
-3-
INTRODUCTION:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seeking qualifications from planning consultants to prepare a
comprehensive Development Code Update, Sign Ordinance, Zoning Map and Specific Plan
Analysis to achieve consistency with the 2010 General Plan that was adopted by City Council in
May 2010. In addition, the City desires to produce development regulations that address
contemporary development and zoning practices, provide more clarity to the reader, and allow
for easier implementation. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is looking to select a private
consultant that will act as the project manager of the Scope of Work outlined in the following
sections.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a City full of history, including Native American habitation,
Abraham Lincoln signing into existence a post office at the base of Red Hill in 1864, and the
many years of the cultivation of citrus and grapes. The community originally developed as three
distinct communities: Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda. With the goal of establishing a
quality community, the three communities joined together and incorporated in 1977.
Today, Rancho Cucamonga encompasses a total planning area of approximately 50 square
miles with approximately 10 square miles located within our Sphere of Influence. The
predominant commercial activity is along the Foothill Boulevard corridor, accented by clusters of
the shopping centers throughout the community. Additionally, the City is home to the
development of the Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center. The City is served by several major
freeways and is in proximity to the Ontario International Airport.
The City is shifting from a rapid growth City to a mature City that is approximately 85% built out.
The current Development Code was effective in guiding the City during its phases of rapid
growth; however, it has not been updated to address the issues that the City has begun to face
as a mature City. Residents and business owners have expressed concerns about infill
compatibility, preservation of existing development (commercial & residential), and the lack of
clarity in the current Development Code. In addition, the lack of clear property maintenance
standards has created difficulties for the Code Enforcement Department to enforce City
regulations and promote a safe and attractive community.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its first Development Code in 1983 (Ordinance #211)
and was subsequently amended in 1999 to incorporate the City's Industrial Area Specific Plan
and Foofhill Boulevard Specific Plan (Ordinance #604). Since adoption, numerous text
amendments have been adopted in response to changing development patterns, State
mandates, and developer requests. However, the core elements of the 1983 document remain
intact. The volume of amendments from this original Ordinance has resulted in a code that is
increasingly awkward and difficult to use. In addition, the City has a variety of Specific Plans,
Community Plans, Master Plans and Overlays that contain additional development standards for
spec'rfic areas of the City.
Also, when the Development Code was first adopted, the City was predominantly vacant with
most development applications consisting of large tracts of land with hundreds of residential
units or large distribution warehouse complexes. Today, the City is largely developed with most
land use applications proposed for smaller residential subdivisions or more modest commercial
and industrial development. As a result, neighborhood compatibility is increasingly important.
The Development Code Update should continue to build on the City's reputation for quality
design by incorporating landscaping in the overall project design, requiring the use of high
quality materials, while maintaining an overall sensitivity to the wise use of natural resources.
P-249
-4-
The Development Code is not a static document. Changes currently being evaluated that may
need to be reflected in the revised Development Code include an update to the Historic
Preservation Ordinance, standards for Farmers Markets and Community Gardens and minimum
landscape standards.
Currently, signs are regulated under a separate title of the Municipal Cade (Title 14 -Ordinance
#65) with only minimal changes adopted since its initial adoption in 1979. Since signage is
important for businesses and a key aesthetic component of the community, revisions to the Sign
Code are to be included as part of this Development Code Update.
SCOPE OF WORK:
The selected consultant will act as the project manager in the analysis of the current
Development Code, Sign Code, as well as all Specific Plans, Community Plans, Master
Plans and Overlays to determine the best methodology for updating the existing
Development Code. The Consultant will be responsible for developing and drafting a
revised Development Code (with graphics), a revised Sign Ordinance, and a GIS based
Zoning Map. In addition, the consultant will be required to perform the appropriate
environmental analysis as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and produce all related documents.
To perform these services, the Consultant must have expertise in analyzing zoning codes,
preparing text amendments, developing GIS based map products, conducting
environmental analysis and creating strong graphics to support text documents. While not
a prerequisite, consultant familiarity with Rancho Cucamonga's existing Development
Code standards and development project review procedures would be helpful.
The Consultant Team will work closely with the City's In-House Development Code
Update Team consisting of staff from Planning, Building and Safety, Engineering,
Redevelopment, Fire and Code Enforcement to ensure that the project meets the goals of
the General Plan, the City Council and does not interfere with other City regulations or
policies. The City's In-House Team will also provide review support and the preparation of
staff reports for public review. The Planning Department will be leading this team and be
the Consultant Team's primary contact.
The Consultant's submittal should describe the process for achieving the scope of work
detailed below. Alternative ideas, programs, formats, and any other suggestions are
encouraged in the proposals. Submittals should also include a preliminary schedule for
achieving each milestone of the process.
TIMEFRAME TO COMPLETE PROJECT:
The City desires the Development Code be adopted by the Ciry Council by April 2012.
The Consultant's submittal should describe the process for achieving the scope of work
details below within this time frame. Submittals must include a preliminary schedule for
achieving each milestone outlines in the scope of work, what information is needed by
staff for each milestone and any concerns with achieving the completed Development
Code Update within the desired timeframe.
A. PROJECT TASKS
TASK 1: PROJECT KICKOFF WITH CONSULTANT TEAM AND IN-HOUSE TEAM
1.1 -Project Kick-off and Work Program Refinement
P-250
-5-
The In-House Team will meet with the selected Consultant Team to review the scope of
work and make draft refinements.
Work Product: Attendance by Consultant Team; refinements to Scope of Work.
1.2 -Revised Scope of Work
The consultant shall revise the Scope of Work based on the refinements made during
Task 1.1. Consultant shall forvvard draft version to In-House Team for review and
agreement.
Work Product: Final Scope of Work prepared by Consultant
TASK 2: ISSUES IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTION
Focusing on the identification of issues is an important initial task that will provide the framework
for the entire Development Code Update. Consultant Team will review pertinent documents,
including the existing Development Code and Sign Ordinance, Specific Plans, Community
Plans, Master Plans, Overlays, policy documents and project approval procedures. The
Consultant Team will conduct a technical review and provide a written analysis of code issues
and alternatives.
2.1 -Data Collection, Review, and Evaluation
Consultant Team will review pertinent documents provided by the In-House Team,
including the Development Code, Sign Code, Specific Plans, Community Plans, Master
Plans, Overlays, policy documents and project approval procedures. Consultant Team will
also gather ordinances (minimum of 3, maximum of 5) from other cities that may serve as
a model. The cities to be reviewed shall be approved by the In-House Team.
Work Product: Review of pertinent documents (Consultant Team); Review of model
ordinances (In-House Team).
2.2 -Analysis of Code Issues and Alternatives
Consultant Team will prepare a "Development Code Analysis and Recommendations"
summary document analyzing the current Development Code, Sign Code, Community
Plans, Master Plans, Overlays, policy documents and project approval procedures from a
broad perspective and provide preliminary recommendations on improvements to the
Code.
Work Product: "Development Code Analysis & Recommendations" summary document
prepared by Consultant Team; In-House Team to review.
2.3 -Work Session with Consultant Team and In-House Team
Work session with Consultant Team and In-House Team to select preferred direction
based on review of the "Development Code Analysis and. Recommendations" summary
document.
Work Product: Work session.
2.4 -Preparation of Annotated Outline
P-257
-6-
Consultant Team will prepare an annotated outline summarizing the City's direction and
make specific recommendations to the current Development Code.
Work Product: Annotated outline prepared by Consultant Team.
2.5 -Public Workshops
Consultant Team will hold a minimum of three (3) public workshops to invite members of
the public and development community to comment on the current Development Code. At
least one of these workshops should be specific to the business and development
community. Consultant Team will prepare a synthesized outline of comments.
Work Product: Three (3) public workshops; synthesized outline of comments. .
2.6 -Stakeholder Interviews
Consultant Team will hold a minimum of twenty (20) stakeholder interviews with selected
residents, business community, development professions, and elected officials.
Consultant Team will prepare a synthesized outline of comments.
Work Product: Twenty (20) stakeholder interviews; synthesized outline of comments.
TASK 3: DEVELOPMENT CODE AND SIGN ORDINANCE UPDATE
Following a thorough analysis of the existing zoning provisions, the Consultant Team will initiate
the Development Code and Sign Ordinance Update. Task 3 will involve the drafting of code
sections, preparation of graphics, and an updated Zoning Map.
3.1 -Draft Development Code and Sign Ordinance Sections
A total of three drafts of the Development Code will be prepared by the Consultant Team
(two rounds of Administrative Drafts and one Public Review Draft) with
graphics/illustrations.
Deliverables: Two Administrative Drafts and One Public Review Draft.
3.2 -Peer-Review by In-House Team
In-House Team will review each of the two Administrative Drafts and provide written
comments to be returned to the Consultant Team.
Deliverables: Written comments for each Administrative Draft.
3.3 -Graphics & Illustrations
Consultant Team will prepare graphics and illustrations to be inserted in the second
Administrative Draft. In-House Team will provide comments on graphics. The final
graphics will be inserted in the Public Review Draft.
Deliverables: Draft graphics for second Administrative Draft; Final graphics for Public
Review Draft.
3.4 -Zoning Map
P-252
7-
Consultant Team will prepare a new Zoning Map in GIS format to City standards and
incorporate all recent zone changes. Consultant will coordinate with the In-House Team
and the City's GIS department before completing.
Deliverables: Draft Zoning Map prepared by Consultant Team.
3.5 -Planning Commission & City Council Joint Workshop
Consultant and In-House Team will conduct a Joint Workshop to review policy direction
during the Preliminary Draft phase. Consultant Team will be present to provide additional
support.
Deliverables: Joint Workshop with Consultant Team present.
3.6 -Environmental Assessment
Consultant Team will analyze and prepare the appropriate Environmental Assessment to
be circulated for review by public agencies.
Deliverables: Environmental Assessment prepared by Consultant Team.
TASK 4: PUBLIC REVIEW ADOPTION
Upon completion of the Public Review Draft of Development Code and Sign Code update
including final graphics and Zoning Map, the In-House Team will present the draft to the
Planning Commission and City Council for final action.
4.1 -Public Hearings
Consultant Team and In-House Team will present the Public Review Draft and Zoning
Map first to the Planning Commission and following Planning Commission
recommendation then to the City Council for final approval and adoption.
Deliverables: Staff Report and ordinance.
4.2 -Final revisions to Code and Map (as necessary)
Should changes be required by Planning Commission and City Council, Consultant Team
will make revisions.
Deliverables: Revisions as necessary.
4.3 -Adoption
B. DELIVERABLES:
The proposal shall include a list of deliverables. All submitted material shall include one
(1) unbound original for the reproduction purposes and one (1) electronic copy in both
Microsoft Word and Adobe PDF formats (CD-ROM).
All deliverables shall be deemed the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION:
P-253
-g-
P-254
CONTRACT TYPE: Fixed Fee -Plus Actual Amount of the other expenses, the professional
service contract, with the payment schedule based upon scheduled project completion and the
City's acceptance of work.
COST: All cost proposals shall be submitted separately in a sealed envelope along with
the RFQ response.
QUALIFICATION: The Consultant shall submit
- Relevant professional qualifications -your firm's experience in completing development
code updates.
- Management qualification -Resumes for the key personnel who will be assigned to the
Development Code Update.
- Relevant project experience -Names, addresses, and the telephone numbers of at
least three California clients that your firm has prepared development code updates for.
Please use the provided form within this RFQ document on page 13:
- Logistic capabilities, special terms and conditions -Name the sub-Consultants you will
retain.
EVALUATION: Each submittal will be evaluated by the City based on the following criteria:
1. Conciseness and clarity.
2. Professional qualifications and the capability of the Consultant team that is assigned
to the project.
3. Ability of the Consultant to commit the personnel and time necessary to complete the
project in the time frame outlined in this RFQ.
4. Experience with similar type projects.
5. Demonstration of a clear understanding of the Project and the work to be performed.
6. Competitive cost.
INSURANCE REQUIREMENT: The Consultant selected will be required to provide the City
with the Certificates of Insurance with Endorsements for Compensation, Commercial General
Liability or Comprehensive broad-form General Public Liability (occurrence), Comprehensive
Automobile Liability, and the Professional Errors and the Omissions Liability and shall not
commence work until it has been obtained.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENT: A sample copy of the City's standard Professional
Service Agreement (generic) is attached for the Consultant's review. This form is subject to
change with the approval of the City Attorney and the Risk Manager.
QUESTIONS: Questions may be submitted in writing to the contact information listed below.
All questions are due no later than Wednesday, February 22 at 5:00 p.m.
PRE-BID MEETING: A pre-bid meeting will be held on February 16, 2011 at 2:00 p.m, at City
Hall in the Tri-Communities Room. Interested firms are encouraged to attend to ask questions
regarding the RFQ of staff.
SUBMISSION DIRECTIONS: Firms interested in responding to this request must submit
10 copies of their response to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Purchasing Department, no later
-9-
P-255
than 5:00 PM on March 10, 2011. Responses submitted after this prescribed date and time will
not be considered.
-10-
ADDENDUMS
The Vendor hereby acknowledges that Addenda Nos. , to this RFQ
have been received, if any (Vendor to insert Addendum No. of each Addendum
received). Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause
the RFO response to be considered non-responsive. Vendor must refer back to the
City's Web Site under the correct posting for this RFO to confirm the number of addenda
(if any) that have been sent. The Web address is
http:/lvendors. olanetbids. com/Ra nchoC/QuickSearch. cfm.
~ The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and
read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, ff this RFO
response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and
instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set
forth in the following RFQ response. THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFQ
RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO
MAY VOID YOUR RFQ RESPONSE.
Company Name: Add
(57eec, Su. p City, State, Zip)
Telephone #:
Fax #:
)email address: Web Address:
Authorized Represeata6ve: (print) Tltle:
Slgnatare: Date:
P-256
-11-
°~EXHISIT A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST AGREEMENT
It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict
of interest, or the appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City
Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements ("PSA")
with potential Vendors and Purchase Orders.
I have specific knowledge of confidential information in regazds to RFQ responses received in
response to the Request for Qualifications, entitled and/or numbered RFQ #10/11-204
Development Code Consulting Services. Therefore, I have been removed from any
involvement in regards to the above RFQ evaluation process.
I agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or
ranking of any RFQ response to anyone. I understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise
divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence,
reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFQ response, or removal of same from
designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I
understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
(Print)
(Relationship to the City}
(Relationship to the Vendor)
(Signature)
(Date)
P-257
-12-
P-258
"EXHIBIT B"
References Worksheet
~ THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFQ RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY VOID YOUR RFQ
RESPONSE.
Provide a minimum of four (4) clients that are similar in size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
your company has conducted comparable or like services for Development Code Consulting
Services. Preferced references should be government agencies and be a curcent customer
within the past three (3) years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Company Name
~ ~" Tel@phone~No.,.:~. .Type ofarchitectural
~
Company Address Contact~Information: ,
_, .. Fax No. and services provided and for_
~
,,. ~ E-Mail Address what entity.,
Name: Contact Name: Phone:
Address: Fax:
Title:
E-mail:
Name: Contact Name: Phone:
Address: Fax:
Title:
E-mail:
Name: Contact Name: Phone:
Address: Fax:
Title:
E-mail:
Name: Contact Name: Phone:
Address: Fax:
Title:
E-mail:
Name: Contact Name: Phone:
Address: Fax:
Title:
E-mail:
-13-
"EXHIBIT C"
Cost
RFQ #10/11-204 Development Code Consulting Services
(must be submitted in a separately sealed envelope)
P-259
-14-
`EXHIBIT D"
SAMPLE
AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of
20_, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal
corporation ("City") and , a
("Consultant").
Chapter 1 RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the
following professional services:
("the Project").
B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services
described in Recital "A', above, necessary to complete the Project.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth
and more fully described herein.
D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws
of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a
good and professional manner.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of pertormance by the parties of the
mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
Consultant's Services.
1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and
professional services described in Recitals "A" and "B" above, including, but not limited
to
all as more fully set forth in the Consultant's proposal, dated and
entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference
herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by
Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the
Services.° In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this
Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.
1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the
Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project
P-260
-IS-
desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based
upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a
revision or revisions to Consultant's-compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant
to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than
ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in
writing by City's City Manager without amendment.
1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under
this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for
professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set
forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such
Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "
1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into
this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to
undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience,
Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in
performing the Services.
1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant
represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has
investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully
considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities,
difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement.
Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of
practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably
acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or
unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant
shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's
risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.
2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement is effective as of the date of mutual
execution (the "Effective Date"), and shall remain in full force and effect until sixty (60)
days after the City has accepted the work in writing and has made final payment, unless
sooner terminated as provided in Section 15 herein.
3. Compensation.
3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in
Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant
shall not exceed $ (), including all out of pocket expenses,
unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not withhold
any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not
more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables
reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to
compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.
The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in
accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services.
City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in
Exhibit A.
P-261
-16-
4. Method of Payment.
4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the
Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail
the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized
extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include
appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be
remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing
within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.
4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30)
calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in
Section 3.
4.4 All records, invoices,
records maintained by Consultant relating
review and audit by the City.
5. Representatives.
time cards, cost control sheets and other
to services hereunder shall be available for
5.1 Citv Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the
contract administrator and City's representative shall be , or such
other person as designated in writing by the City ("City Representative"). It shall be
Consultant's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the
progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions
that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified
herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City
Representative.
5.2 Consultant Reoresentative. For the purposes of this Agreement,
is hereby designated as the principal and representative of
Consultant authorized to actin its behalf with respect to the services specified herein
and make all decisions in connection therewith ("Consultant's Representative"). It is
expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the
Consultant's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this
Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant's Representative shall be responsible during the
term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient
time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the
Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.
6. Consultant's Personnel.
6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and
licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without
limitation, a City business license as required by the City's Municipal Code.
P-262
-17-
6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work
performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with
the standard of care set forth in Section 7 below.
6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and
subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to
employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social
Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the
provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to
be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in
accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the Services.
6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its
elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents
serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, from any and
all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising
from Consultant's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the Califomia
Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to
Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of
Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising
under this Section 6.
7. Standard of Performance. Consultant shall perform all services to all
customary and applicable professional standards, in compliance with any and all
applicable laws; statutes and regulations, and in a manner reasonably satisfactory to
City.
8. Ownership of Work Product.
8.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files,
drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared,
created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including
any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same
(collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit
of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this
Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction
or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches,
charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this
Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product
shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by
Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its
representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no
circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings,
reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery,
notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment,
performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination
of this Agreement. City's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the
Project, shall be at City's sole risk.
P-263
-18-
8.2. Assignment of Intellectual Prooerty Interests: Upon execution of
this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 8.1, above,
the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its
subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory
copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to
the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no
rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by
law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including
but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring,
rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.
8.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents
that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any
instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists,
including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of
the Work Product andlor materials produced under this Agreement, and that Ciry has
full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall
defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants,
attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the
role of city officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a
claim that City's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual
provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.
Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade
secret or trademarked documents, materials, equipment, devices or processes used or
incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the
event any use of any such documents, materials, equipment, devices or processes
("Protected Materials"), or the Work Product, is held to constitute an infringement and
any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the
right to continue using the Protected Materials by suspension of any injunction or by
procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it
becomes non-infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
9. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times
remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to
incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of
City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant
or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or
employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required
taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify
and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest
asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by
this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law
regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. Consultant further agrees to
indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Consultant to comply with
applicable workers' compensation laws. Ciry shall have the right to offset against the
amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City
from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any
reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 9.
P-264
-19-
10. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting,
statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants
that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by
Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not
be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant
such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned
to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this
section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to
information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the
Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide
information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or
other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably
necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.
17. Conflict of Interest.
11.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not
acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which
would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further
covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest
shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the~appearance of having
any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.
Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this
Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided
in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any
matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained.
11.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained
any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for
Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to
pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for
Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent
upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty,
City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement
without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the
full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.
11.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City
has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or
otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such
interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this
Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such
interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of
interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 11.1.
12. Indemnification.
12.1 Professional Services. In the connection with its professional
services, the Consultant shall -hold harmless and indemnify City, and its elected officials,
officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent
P-265
_Zp_ .
contractors in the role of city or agency officials, (collectively, "Indemnitees"), with
respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or
expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to
any person and injury to any property, to the extent the same out of, pertain to, or relate
to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its
officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its
professional services under this Agreement. Consultant shall reimburse all reasonable
defense costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs
incurred in connection with such defense.
12.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by
Section 12.1, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees
with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or
injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to
the non-professional acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its
officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of this
Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in
connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs
and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection
with such defense.
12.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any
rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or
the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this
Agreement.
12.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation. Except as otherwise expressly
provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under
or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while
acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of
or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.
12.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 12 shall survive the
termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which
Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent
to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of
judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to
recover under this indemnity provision.
13. Insurance.
13.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full
force and effect for the duration bf this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries
to persons or damages to property and professional negligence which may arise from or
in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its
agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors.
13.2 Minimum Scooe of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City,
coverage shall be at least as broad as:
P-266
-21-
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability
coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State
of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the
City, having an extended reporting period of not less than
three (3) years; or Professional Liability insurance shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of
the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year
period, provide protection against claims of professional
negligence arising out of Consultant's performance of the
Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 13. Either policy shall be
endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent
insurable.
13.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no
less than:
(1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate
limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general
limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,OOO,OOO.per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the
aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers'
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.
13.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-
insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City.
13.5 Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile
liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers
and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of
city or agency officials, are to be covered as additional
insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and
completed operations of Consultant; premises owned,.
P-267
_ZZ_
occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned,
leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage
shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to City. its officers, officials. emplovees, designated
volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of Citv or agency officials which are not also
limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant's
insurance coverage (except Professional Liability and
Workers' Compensation) shall be primary insurance as
respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in
the role of city or agency officials. Any insurance or self-
insurance maintained by City, their officers, officials,
employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials
shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
(3) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each
insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except
after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has
been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-
payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty (30)
days written notice to City prior to implementation of a
reduction of limits or material change of insurance coverage
as specified herein.
(5) Each insurance policy, except for the professional liability
policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the
insurer's right of subrogation against City and its elected
officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated
volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors
in the role of city or agency officials.
(6) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by
City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the
State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according
to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide.
(7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other
provisions of the required policy, including breaches of
warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided.
P-268
-23-
(t3) Specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending
any claim against any insured, including court costs and
attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not
deplete any policy limits.
(9) Other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as
required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to
this Agreement.
13.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under
this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original
endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance
coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person
authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies
shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance.
If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall
provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the
required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of
insurance.
14. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City
relating to Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement,
Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might
require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an
amount to be agreed upon by the parties.
15. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any
time for any or no reason on not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice to
Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall
pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the
termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant
shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim
for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured
more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.
Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10)
business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the
City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment
Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered
into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for
any Additional Services required because of such changes.
16. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of
delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant's and City's
regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United
States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this section, or to such other
addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the
provisions of this section.
P-269
-24
All notices shall be addressed as follows:
If to. City: City Clerk
If to Consultant: ,Principal
17. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the
performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee,
subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex,
marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical
condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during
employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status,
national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual
orientation.
18. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign, transfer,
or subcontract any interest in this Agreement or the performance of any of Consultant's
obligations hereunder without City's prior written consent. Except as provided herein,
any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or
obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect.
19 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time
Consultant performs the Services.
20. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of
any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a
waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall
the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver
by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of
Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or
prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.
21. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall
commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover
its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees arid costs of experts.
22 Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this
Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material
discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of
any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall
prevail.
P-270
-25-
P-271
23. Applicable Law and Venue; Construction. The validity, interpretation,
and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws
of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the
San Bernardino Superior Court. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute
regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement
shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against
the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the
Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.
24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this Agreement, and any
other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto,
each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, represents the entire and
integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all
prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may
not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed
by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized
representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
Consultant
By:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
By:
Mayor
By:
(two signatures required if corporation)
-26-
P-272
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
P-273
Did You Remember to...
^ USE THE CITY PROVIDED RFQ RESPONSE SHEET?
^ INCLUDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PRODUCT AND
SERVICES YOU ARE PROPOSING ON AS REQUIRED?
^ SIGN YOUR RFQ RESPONSE?
^ INCLUDE ONE SIGNED ORIGIANL AND FIVE (5) COPIES FOR REVIEW?
^ COMPLY WITH AN ENVIORNMENTALLY FRIENDLY METHOD OF
SUBMITTAL AS REQUESTED, UTILIZING DOUBLE SIDED PRINTING AND
REFRAINING FROM THE USE OF THREE-RING BINDERS, ONLY
UTILIZING ONE OF THE FOLLOWING BINDING METHODS; LOOSE
SHEETS FASTENED WITH A BINDER CLIP, STAPLED OR A THREE-HOLE
FOLDER WITH FASTNERS?
*** Subm%tta~ls Due: it2arcb l0, 2l3/1, bra i:ll(t PM ~~'*
THANK YOU
P-274
ur
N A W N -~ A
O
3
1 ?0 K ~7~N 6 3~ ~ n
O N N
m T fD
£~ a
~ N p
~o m m O
y ~ o o ,
.O N .» O N O
O
~~ O O
_O .O. ~
~° O
-. > >
°~
m
2
N j O
o. F
~ ~^
ao S
a m
M
~
f
m ~
~
~ y j
m
n
~ o~ 3 3 m c m ~ °' A
y O m
W N C ~ E N O N m ~.
m a= m
~ m m ~
o .z ~ m
'^ 3
o ~,
~~
~
O ~ n
m ~
ry O
s O
w .
N O..-.
a
~ ~ ~
~ g
a 3
o a
~ S a ~
o ~ ~ p g
~ y
O '~
1
r O ~
y
0 N
~ N
O N
O N
o N
0 N
o N O_
~ S
~ ~
m
~ N r A A N 3
N t
J ~
S
~ W
N ~ V W(
A ~ O = 7
O
7
m
2
O
N
N A A A A A ~
i N N W A A .~
m
d
a
~
o W
W N
QJ W
A W
W W
O N
D
03n~n
A ~ 7 T~
~ m
N ~ O ~ ~
- N - o ~
d A y s y
O N ® + n
~oye~.
m ~ ~ A O
$ O n
? m o~i
m ~O ~
Ol ~ d
c
.d. C'1
O O
~ a
m
n
0
N
C
7
m
y
A
2
0
w
~~^ 0~~1~
PMC®
April 8, 201 I
Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager, CPPB
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729-0807
RE: BEST AND FINAL OFFER FOR DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSULTANT SERVICES
Dear Ms. Hinojos:
PMC is pleased to submit the attached Besc and Final Offer (BAFO) for Development Code Consultant
Services for the City of Rancho Cuamonga. We enjoyed meeting City Staff at the interview and
appreciate the opportunity to respond to questions, provide additions and clarifications, and to sharpen
our pencils on project cost. Based on the BAFO request and discussions with staff during the interview,
PMC is submitting a complete edited qualifications submittal with additions and changes submitted on
April 4~^ now incorporated for a complete submittal.
Additionally, in response to direction from Jennifer Nakamura, we have removed Task 6.1 (Interattive
Web-Based Development Code and Map) from the scope description and cost estimates.
We're looking forward to partnering with you on this challenging and exciting project If you have any
further questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contatt Ms. Johns at (866) 626-6PMC, ext.
1031 I or 916-231-2237.
Sinter
.~
Philip O. Carter
President
POC:PJ:kc
c~~
Pam Johns
Project Manager
P.1Califomia, Snce oRRandio Cuamonga, City oAPll-0161 Rancho Cuamonga Devdopment Cade UpdatelFINAL Submiml -Edits
IncorpontedlPam's files for gmberlie\FWI Cover Letter 48-1 I.daa
P-276
21177 S. Western Avenue, Suite 200 • Torrance, CA 90501 • P: (310) 224-4500 • F: (310) 320-5772
P-277
This RF res onse ha s been submitted b
Company Name: A re '
(Street, Su. q Ciry, State, Zip)
Contact Name:
Telephone b:
Fax N:
E-mail address:
Request for Qualifications "RFQ" #10/11-204
Development Code Consulting Services
Submit Request for Qualification response to:
~ Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager, CPPB
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Physical Address: 10500 Civic Center Drive
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807
Your submittal shall be delivered in an envelope clearly marked:
"RFQ" #10/11-204
Development Code Consulting Services"
Submittals Due: March 10, 2011, by 5:00 p.m.
Direct Questions to:
~ Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager
E-mail keri.hinojos a cityofrc.us
Fax #: (909) 919-2610
Questions Due: February 22, 2011, by 5:00 p.m.
NOTICE
From the issuance date of this Request for QualiTications until a Qualified Vendors list is
identified and said list is publicized, Vendors are not permitted to communicate with any
City staff or officials regarding this procurement, other than during interviews,
demonstrations, and/or site visits, except at the direction of Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior
Buyer, Acting Purchasing Manager, or Ruth Cain, CPPB, Buyer II, the designated
representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2-
P-278
PARTICIPATION CLAUSE
Participation Clause:
It is hereby understood that other governmental entities, such as cities, counties, and
special/school districts may utilize this RFQ response at their option for equipment or services at
the RFQ response price for a period of days. Said entities shall have the option to
participate in any award made as a result of this solicitation. Any such piggy-back awards will
be made independently by each agency, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not an agent,
partner or representative of these agencies and is not obligated or liable for any action of debts
that may arise out of such independently negotiated piggy-back procurement. Each public
agency shall accept sole responsibility of its own order placement and payments to the Vendor.
Successful Vendor will extend prices as proposed herein to other governmental agencies,
please specify. YES NO
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE OFEVENTS
EVENT DATE
Post Re uest for Qualification Februa 8, 2011
Pre-Bid Meetin Februa 16, 2011, at 2:00 P.M.
Questions Due Februa 22, b 5:00 P.M.
Addendum Issued Februa 28, 2011
RF Res onse Due Date March 10, 2011, b 5:00 P.M.
Vendor Short List Selection TBD Onl if necessa
Oral Presentations/Interviews TBD Onl if necessa
Antici ated Award Date TBD
(The City reserves the right to change schedule of events without prior notice or
responsibility to Vendor.)
-3-
i
RANCHO
C,UCAMONGA
March 29, 2011
Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC)
Attn: Philip Carter
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
916-361-8384 x 10202 phone
916-361-1574 fax
pcarter(o~pmcworld.com
Alayor L. DENNIS MICHAEL • A4 yr Pro Trm $M1 $PACNCPc'1279
ColOff!l A~fnl6C1T WILLIAM ~. ALEXANDER, CH UCK ~UQUET, DIANE WILLIMIS
Ciro A4nungrrJACK h~l, AICP
THE C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Request for Best and Final Offer
Development Code Consultant Services
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) #10/11-204
Introduction:
The evaluation of Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 10/11-204 has concluded and ashort-list of top-ranked
finalists has been established. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has decided to proceed with the Best and
Final Offer (BAFO) phase of the evaluation process. As a Finalist, you are invited to submit a BAFO proposal.
All provisions, instructions, requirements, terms, and conditions of this RFQ are applicable to this BAFO unless
otherwise noted herein.
All correspondence regarding this solicitation shall be referred to Keri Hinojos via E-mail to
keri.hinoios(rilciNofrc.us or by phone to 909-477-2700 x 2501.
BAFO Proposal Instructions:
BAFO Proposal will be received until 9:00 p.m., Monday, April 4, 2011.
The Finalists shall submit one (1) original with two (2) copies to the following address:
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: Keri Hinojos
10500 Civic Center Dr.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RFQ#10/11-204
As part of this BAFO request, the following items shall be addressed in your submittal:
1. Answer the below questions/clarifications.
2. Document any changes or additional information that your firm would like to clarify or add to the original
Request for Qualifications submitted on February 8, 2011.
3. Include any deviations to the Professional Services Agreement (PSA) that was presented in the original
RFQ document for consideration and submit a separate attachment stating your deviations.
4. Submit best and final pricing utilizing the same format from your original Cost Proposal as a separate
attachment.
IUSUO Chic (:enter Dr. • I?O. Bnx RI17 • Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729-UXU7 •'Icl (9U9) 477-27UU • Fax (')U9) 477-2R49 • www.CinrofRC.us
P-280
Questions/Clarifications:
1. Produce two (2) cost submittals: one (1) assuming an environmental analysis comprising of an addendum to the
General Plan EIR and one (f) assuming environmental analysis comprising of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
2. Clarify in your proposal that if the 4 public hearings (2 Planning Commission, 2 City Council) are not needed, we
will only be charged for meetings attended by PMC.
3. Add to both cost submittals fees for the following items:
a) Production of an interactive zoning map for public view and use to be delivered after the adoption of the
Development Code.
b) Production of an online development code for public view and use to be delivered after the adoption of
the Development Code.
C) Speck Plan analysis to determine the changes needed to each Specific Plan, Community Plan or
Overlay that will bring the plan in conformance with the Development Code. This will be a secondary
deliverable to be completed after the adoption of the Development Code and NOT part of the current
timeline. A timeline for this secondary deliverable will be finalized in Task 1.
~ The undersigned firm declares that he has carefu!(y examined the specifications and read the above terms and
conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, ij this RFQ response is accepted, !o furnish all material in
accordance with the specifications and instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost
amounts set forth in the following RFQ response. THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING TXIS RFQ RESPONSE
MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FA/LURE TO DO SO MAY VOID YOUR RFQ
RESPONSE.
Company Name:
p Address:
Pac
c Municipal Consultants (Street
Su
# City
State
Zip)
Telephone #: ,
.
,
,
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220
916-361-8381 ext. 10202 Rancho Cordova
CA 95670
Fax #: ,
E-mail a~dress: Web Address:
carter mcworld.com www, mcworld.com
Authorized Repre entative: (print) Title;
President
Signature: Date:
-' ril 1
Thank you again for participating in our process. We look forward to reviewing your proposed Best and Final
Offer.
Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
BAFO Request - PMC.doc Page 2 of 2
ADDENDUMS
The Vendor hereby acknowledges that Addenda Nos. ~) , to this RFO
have been received, if any (Vendor to insert Addendum No. of each Addendum
received). Vendor understands failure to acknowledge any addenda issued may cause
the RFO response to be considered non-responsive. Vendor must refer back to the
City's Web Site under the correct posting for this RFQ to confirm the number of addenda
(if any) that have been sent. The Web address is
htto://vendors. Dlanetbids.com/RanchoC/QuickSearch.cfm.
~ The undersigned firm declares that he has carefully examined the specifications and
read the above terms and conditions, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this RFO
response is accepted, to furnish all material in accordance with the specifications and
instructions, in the time and manner therein prescribed for the unit cost amounts set
forth in the following RFO response. THE VENDOR IN SUBMITTING THIS RFO
RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO
MAY VOID YOUR RFO RESPONSE.
Com an~ Nelpe;
Paa~ic Muniapal Consultants Address:
Si
S
# Ci
St
t
Zi
(
ree4
u.
ty,
a
e,
p)
Tale bone #:
p
916-
361-8384 ext. 10202 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220
Fa: #:
9 -3 1-1 74 ncho C r v A 9 7
E-mail d ss:
pcarfaer pmcworld.com Web Address:
www.pmcworld.com
Authorized Representative: (print) Title:
Phili O. afar President
Signature: ~ Date: March 8, 201 1
P-281
°EXHIBIT A"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST AGREEMENT
It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prevent personal or organizational conflict
of interest, or [he appearance of such conflict of interest, in the award and administration of City
Contracts, including, but not limited to Contracts for Professional Services Agreements ("PSA")
with potential Vendors and Purchase Orders.
have specific knowledge of confidential information in regards to RFQ responses received in
response to the Request for Qualifications, entitled and/or numbered RFQ #10/11-204
Development Code Consulting Services. Therefore, 1 have been removed from any
involvement in regards to the above RFQ evaluation process.
t agree not to disclose or otherwise divulge any information pertaining to the contents, status, or
ranking of any RFQ response to anyone. 1 understand the terms and "disclose or otherwise
divulge" to include, but are not limited to, verbal conversations, written correspondence,
reproduction of any part or any portion of any RFQ response, or removal of same from
designated areas.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the following statements are true and correct and that I
understand and agree to be bound by commitments contained herein.
(Print)
(Relationship to the City)
(Relationship to the Vendor)
(Signature)
(Date)
P-282
_IZ_
P-283
EXHIBIT B
REFERENCES WORKSHEET
THE VENDOR 11V SUBMITTING THIS RFQ RESPONSE MUST FILL IN THE
FOLLOWING INFORMATION. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY VOID YOUR RFQ
RESPONSE.
Provide a minirnum of four (4) clients that arc similar nr size to the City of Rancho Cucamonga your
company has conducted comparable ox like services fox Development Code Consulting Services.
Preferred references should be govenunent agencies and be a cuaent customer within the past three (3)
years. Please verify accuracy of contact information.
Company Name Contact Telephone No., Type of architectural
Company Address Information Fax No. and services provided and for
E-Mail Address what entity
Name: Contact Name: Phone: (916) 851-8800 Comprehensive Zoning
City of Rancho Cordova Ted Gaebler Fax: (916) 851-8787 Code Update for the City of
Address: Title:
E-mail: Rancho Cordova, CA
2729 Prospect Park Drive City Manager Igaebler@cityofranchocortlova.org
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Name: Contact Name: Phone: (760) 367-6799 Downtown Economic
City of Twentynine Palms Charles LaClaire Fax: (760) 367-4890 Revitalization Specific Plan
Address: Title:
E-mail: claclaire@29palms.org for Twentynine Palms, CA
6136 Adobe Road Community Development
Twentynine Palms, CA 92277 Director
Name: Contact Name: Phone: (951) 677-7751 x 213 Staff Planning Services for
City of Wildomar Eric Norris, AICP Fax: N/A the City of Wildomar
Address: Title: E-mail:
23873 Clinton Keith Rd., Suite 201 Interim Planning Director enorris@cityoiwildomar.org
Wildomar, CA 92595
Name: Contact Name: Phone: 530-879-6806 General Plan Uptlale and EIR
City of Chico Brendan Vieg Fax N/A (scheduled for City Council
Address: Title:
E-mail: adoption April, 2011) -
411 Main Street
Principal Planner
bvieg onci.chico.ca.us Pam Johns and Pat Angell
managed the GP and EIR,
Chico, CA 95928 respectively
Name: Contact Name: Phone:415-435-3838 Zoning Ordinance update to
City of Belvedere Pierce MacDonald Fax: 415-435-0430 establish a new Planned Unit
Address: Title:
E-mail: Development Ordinance
450 San Rafael Ave. Plannin Mana er
0 0
pmacdonaldCo~citvofbelvedere.ore (adopted March, 2011) -
Pam Johns served as project
Belvedere, CA 94920
manager
Name: City of Manteca Contact Name: Phone: 209-456-8516 Comprehensive Zoning
Address: Rochelle Henson Fax 209-923-8949 Cotle Update (public review
1001 West Center Street Title:
E-mail: draft in April, 2011) -
Pam Johns is the project
Manteca, CA 95337 Senior Planner rhenson(iilci.manteca.ca.us
manager
PMC - '-- -'-- ~i0_ -
P-284
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Overview ....................................................................................................................................1-1
Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... t-1
Primary Tasks to be Completed .............................................................................................................1-2
Coordination with In-House Team .......................................................................................................... 1-3
Project Scope of Work ............................................................................................................................2-1
Task List ............................................................................................................................................... 2-1
PMC's Availability ................................................................................................................................ 2-8
Communication .................................................................................................................................... 2-8
Project Personnef ...................................................................................................................................3-1
Experience and Oualifirations ..................................................................................................................4-1
PMC Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4-1
Relevant Experience .............................................................................................................................. 4-2
Project Schedule ....................................................................................................................................5-1
Exhibit C -Cost Proposal ............................................................................................... under separate cover
Appendices
Appendix A-Resumes
Attachments (behind cover letter)
2-8-11 Request for Qualifications
3-29-11 Request for Best and Final Offer
Addendum Acknowledgement
Exhibit A
Exhibit B ~
~ PMC
P-285
0
`m'
n
0
m
Z
cv
P-286
PROJECT OVERVIEW
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PMC is pleased to submit this Statement of Qualifications to prepaze a Development Code Update for
the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to the Request fox Qualifications #10/11-204.
The Problem -The City has outgrown its 1983-1999 Development Code. The City is no longer a
growing, undeveloped suburb. It now stands as swell-planned maturing City. Numerous amendments
have created internal inconsistencies. Anew, comprehensive Community Vision and General Plan was
implemented in 2010. The Sign Code needs updating. A new GIS based Zoning Map is required. A lot
of work needs to be completed in about one year.
The Goals -PMC is suggesting that your Development Code update begin with a number of goal
statements that will be used to guide the update process. The PMC team would respond as follows:
• The update shall be consistent with the ne~v 2010 General Plan, state and federal law.
Lots of things have changed since 1983. ~X~hile the City has updated the ctm~ent codes several
times (83'-10~ to keep pace, it is time to look at the code holistically and ensure that the new
code reflects the City's General Plan as well as new Statewide legislation. PMC will pa}'
particulaz attention to the spirit of the Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga's Guiding Principles.
The new code itself needs to be logically organized and easy to understand. Ease of use
is important to the success of the new code. The broad acceptance of the code by the
community and developers will hinge on the effectiveness of the code to be understood by
public. PMC will create a structure that is logical, easy to read and reproduce. The hallmark of
any PMC Code is the use of rich images and graphics and easy to use charts -all with lots of
color to assist in the format. PMC will also create a code that can be readily updated and
uploaded to the website for review -greatly expanding the accessibility of the code.
Incorporate smart growth and "green" principles as appropriak. The new code should include
the Stuart Growth principles that make sense to the unique and special aspects of the Gty of
Rancho Cucamonga. PMC will not propose laundry list of well intentioned but inappropriate
concepts for your Gty. Rather than simply adopt LEED green building practices, PMC suggests
that you develop a utdque Rancho Cucamonga "green code". All members of the PMC project
team have won APA awards for Smart Growth implementation. We win these awards because we
help out clients aeate effective implementation documents that work for each jwisdiction.
• Maintain Rancho's High Standards for Quality Design. The hallmark of your existing
development code is its attention to the design of "place". The New Code has to follow suit and 'I
the team selected to undertake this project must understand design. The maintenance of
neighborhood compatibility and infill development hinges on the understanding of how good ~~,
urban design is translated into development standards. I
Incorporate numerous Specific Plans, Community Plans, Master Plans and Overlays.
Over the yeazs, the City has adopted several unique planning documents that need to be
consistently integrated into the new Code. The secret is to develop a method for incorporation
without unduly homogenizing the good works and entitlements contained in those documents.
• A Revised Sign Code. Nothing impacts the aesthetics of a City like signs. The Development
Code update project provides a great opportunity to bring the Sign Code into the Development
PMC
I
. _ !®
P-287
- - -- --- ---- -----
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Code (from the Municipal Code) and to develop a graphically rich, single source Code that
makes good sign design decisions happen.
• New zoning map. Regardless of the text, most people prefer to look at a map. Critical to the
update will be a new easy to use and read zoning map, with clear and easy to understand
texrninology, and linked specifically to the revised code.
The Team -PMC proposes a management team of Development/Design Code experts that will exceed
the expectations of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga by providing a combination of National expertise,
California pLlmring experience, local knowledge and urban design expertise. Project Manages Pam Johns is
a Senior Associate and partner with PMC. She will lead this project and will attend all public meetings in
the Ciry. Pam has extensive experience writing development codes in several California jurisdictions.
Assistant Project Manager, Jeff Beiswengex has Development Code writing experience in eleven States and
brings a real hands-on understanding of the intricate details of Code writing. Project Advisor, Mark
Brodeur is an urban designer with a keen eye for developing award-winning design/development standazds
throughout California. Finally, Sam Gennawey is an expert at public outreach and consensus building fox
municipal planni a projects such as this. Most notably, Sam was the pxunary outreach specialist for your
2010 General Plan and has a real understanding of the "spirit" of Rancho Cucamonga. Pam, Jeff, Mark and
Sam will all be actively involved with this assignment.
Oux scope of work reflects our experience and our team fully understands the extent of the update
process. First there is the discovery and review of existing codes, then suggested revisions and public
outreach, followed by intense editing and chasing down references to other codes. TMs is followed by
formatting, posting on the net, and review of the code by the public, more revisions and finally a version
suitable fox adoption. Of course, at the very last minute, at the very last hearing, there will probably be
some change request that will need to be considered. We know this because we do this a lot. What is
important to the City is that we remain calm, responsive to the commuttity and above all helpful through
the process. There is alwa}'s more than one way to do something, and with our experience we can offer
suggestions that may have been used in San Diego, San Luis Obispo, Sacramento, Phoenix ox Seattle.
More to the point we understand the passions that sometimes arise during debate of such mundane
things as setbacks, easements, orientation and the planting of trees, and can help express that passion in
more reasonable terms in your updated Development Code.
PRIMARY TASKS TO BE COMPLETED
1) Listening. Oux first task will be to listen to issues assouated with the current code and hear what
the staff and community would like to see in the new code. We'll take lots of notes during this
task, organize them and use them to lead more in-depth discussions. We know the City through
our work in adjacent communities and southern California, but we'll get to know the issues
better through this task. During this task we anticipate two City meetings to meet stakeholders
and discover the issues important to them.
2) Provide website information fox posting on the City's website throughout the process.
3) Review the General Plan, current code and actively solicit input from staff, stakeholders and
community members.
4) Review and make recommendations to discretionary and ministerial project processes including
appeal procedures.
---
® PMC
P-288
PROJECT OVERVIEW
5) Assemble a list of key issues and meet with staff to ensure that PMC has captured the breadth
of the topics to be addressed in the comprehensive update document.
G) Prepare a draft Development Code Update that is compliant with state law; is consistent with
the General Plan and free of legal inconsistencies; utilizes professional, up-to-date planning
terms and language; and reflects the goals and character of Rancho Cucamonga. It will be cleaz,
precise, and user-friendly; specify the relevant reviewing bodies and processes needed to
accurately process applications; and remove any contradiction within the existing document.
7) Meet and discuss the Administrative Draft of the Development Code with staff.
S) Review the draft code with the City Planning Commission through two meetings. After reviewing
the input from these meetings, make any revisions to the Code and prepaze it fox public hearings.
9) Prepare the necessary environmental documentation fox staff to review (an Initial Study with a
negative declaration is expected to meet the requirements under CEQA).
10) Prepare staff reports, attend and present at Planning Commission hearings and City Council
hearings on the document, and make amendments to the document as needed following
Planning Commission and/or City Council rettiew.
COORDINATION WITH IN-HOUSE TEAM
At PMC, we understand the importance of effective communication and coordination between the
consultant and agency staff. PMC staff develops zoning and development regulations as planning
consultants and as contract planning staff. No one knows the unique community issues, political issues,
and the City Development Code better than City of Rancho Cucamonga planning/engineering staff.
Throughout the project process, PMC staff will work closely with the staff "In-House Team" (RCTeam)
gain knowledge, discuss issues, and deliberate appropriate solutions.
Eazly in the process we will identify a key Ciry contact pennon and procedure to ensure regulaz
communication between our team and the RC Team This will facilitate effective communication, provide
feedback, and ensure rapid responses to specified needs. We anticipate that the RC Team would be available
to our team to provide us with identified/needed materials, coordinate discussions with other relevant staff,
clanifY issues, review drafts, and, most importantly, give us a summary of what works and does not work in
the existing code. PMC will meet and/or conduct conference calls with the RC Team staff on an approximate
biweekly basis and will communicate regularly on key issues and progress of the work effort
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
This scope of work assumes that PMC will team with staff on the public parddpation. PMC staff will plan
and execute three public workshops with engaging presentations and provide summary notes approved by
the RC Team; prepaze for and execute one joint PC/CC Workshop to review the draft code, followed by two
Plauuing Commission hearings and two City Council heanings for adoption of the Code. PMC will make
amendments to the document as needed following Planning Cotrvnission and/or City Council review.
PMC ._ __._ .. ®.
P-289
0
`m'
n
cn
n
0
m
0
0
x
P-290
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
TASK LIST
PMC will perform the following tasks under service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
TASK 1 PROJECT INITIATION WITH CONSULTANT TEAM AND IN-HOUSE TEAM (RC TEAM)
The purpose of this task is to establish a solid program fox the successful update of the City's
Development Code. This task involves a staff meeting, data collection and review, and a summary of key
recommendations and options for the project.
Subtask 1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting and Work Program Refinement
At the outset of the project, PMC staff will hold a meeting with staff to review our contract and work
program in detail, establish working procedures and key contacts at the City, and identify and collect
relevant reports and materials. This meeting would include discussion of City/PMC coordination and '
commutilcation (e.g., additional meetings, phone, fax, and e-mail). As indicated in the RFP, PMC will
collect the staff-identified list of inconsistencies and key areas of concern.
Meetings: One (1) meeting with staff
Deliverables: Attendance and Refinements to Work Program
Subtask 1.2 Revised Scope of Work
PMC shall revise the Scope of Woxk based on the refinements made during Task 1.1. PMC will forward
the draft version to the RC Team fox review and agreement.
Deliverables: Revised Scope of ~X/ork prepared by PMC
TASK 2 ISSUES IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTION
Focusing on the identification of issues is an important initial task that will provide the framework for
the entice Development Code Update. PMC will review pertinent documents, including the existing
Development Code and Sign Ordinance, Specific Plans, Community Plans, Master Plans, Overlays,
policy documents and project approval procedures. The Consultant Team will conduct a technical
review and provide a written analysis of code issues and alternatives.
Subtask 2.1 Data Collection, Review, and Evaluation
PMC staff will review the City's existing Development Code and Zoning Map, along with other relevant
plans and policies adopted by the City. This review will assess the adequacy of the existing text in the
Development Code in terms of compliance with state and federal laws, identified inconsistencies,
compliance with the General Plan, evaluation of identified potential amendments, and xeseazch fox desired
and optional new provisions. PMC will also gather ordinances (minimum of three (3), maximum of five
(5)) from other cities that may serve as a model. The cities to be reviewed shall be approved by the RC
Team.
Deliverables: Review of pertinent documents (PMC); Review of model ordinances (RC Team)
PMC
P-291
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
Subtask 2.2 Analysis of Code Issues and Alternatives
PMC will prepaze a "Development Code Analysis and Recommendations" sutntnary document
analyzing the current Development Code, Sign Code, Community Plans, Master Plans, Overlays, policy
documents and project approval procedures from a broad perspective and pro~~de preliminary
recommendations on improvements to the Code. PMC will create a summary of key recommendations
and a draft outline for the Development Code, along with a few document format sample pages for staff
consideration and approval.
Deliverables: "Development Code Analysis & Recommendations" summary document prepazed
by Consultant Team; In-House Team to renew. Development Code outline and
document format samples
Draft Zoning Map for discussion (one (1) electronic copy and one (1) hazd copy)
Subtask 2.3 Work Session with PMC and RC Team
Work session with PMC and RC Team to select preferred direction based on review of the
"Development Code Analysis and Recommendations" summary document.
Deliverables: Work session
Subtask 2.4 Preparation of Annotated Outline
PMC will prepare an annotated outline summarizing the City's direction and make specific
recommendations to the current Development Code.
Deliverables: Annotated outline prepared by Consultant Team.
Subtask 2.5 Public Workshops
PMC will hold a minimum of tluee (3) public workshops to invite members of the public and
development community to comment on the current Development Code. Workshops will be held for
three separate phases of the project: 1) issue identification, 2) consideration of solutions to key issues,
and 3) review of the draft Development Code and Map. At least one of these workshops should be
specific to the business and development community. PMC will prepare a synthesized outline of
comments.
Deliverables: Workshop agendas, materials, and synthesized outline of comments
Meetings: Three (3) public workshops
Subtask 2.6 Stakeholder Interviews
PMC will hold a mittintum of twenty (20) stakeholder interviews with selected residents, business community,
development professions, and elected officials. Interviews will be held on two or tluee consecutive days and
City Staff will assist with the outreach and scheduling of stakeholder interviews. PMC will prepaze a
synthesized outline of comments.
Deliverables: Interview questions, materials, and synthesized outline of comments
Meetings: Twenty (20) stakeholder interviews
® PMC
P-292
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 3 PREPARE DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CODE/SIGN CODE
The purpose of this task is to establish a code outline and standazd format, then prepaze component pieces
of the Development Code for staff review and review by the Gty's advisory and decision-making bodies.
Subtask 3.1 Administrative Drafts of Development Code/Sign Code
Based upon the results of our work in Tasks 1 and 2, PMC staff will prepaze a total of two (2)
admirtistrative drafts of the Development/Sign Code fox review and input by the City Staff Team. At a
minimum, the drafts will accomplish the following:
• Establish clew and specific development regulations all land use districts;
• Achieve consistency with the General Plan, state and federal laws;
• Describe the progam and process under which development applications will be reviewed;
• Present the code in a foanat that is reader-friendly and executable;
• Include sufficient graphic support for regulations.
• Incorporate all Development Code updates since incorporation.
If desired, PMC will work with the City Staff Team to submit the Aduiltrisrsative Drafts in two or three
component parts for eazly and expedited review. For example, PMC can provide the following packets
of information in phases to commence review early and luxtit the volume of materials being reviewed by
the City Staff Team atone time:
1. Development Code Administration and Pemilts/Entitlements
2. Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Site Planning Provisions (including sign regulations)
3. Subdivision Regulations and other Miscellaneous Building Code Provisions
Deliverables: Ten (10) copies of each of two (2) Administrative Drafts Development Code in
three-ring binders, and one (1) electronic copy
Subtask 3.2 Draft Zoning Map Changes
Utilizing base map data from the City, the PMC team will incorporate the map changes to provide a
graphic representation of the Development Code Update. This work task assumes that the City map and
any related resources will be made available to PMC in an electronic format (AutoCAD or GIS) during
Task 1, and that PMC will not need [o enter background technical data to complete the base map. VUe
further assume that no significant edits or adjustments will be necessary to the base map and that the
map will provide closed polygons. Using the format developed with the staff, the PMC team will
develop Zoning Maps showing proposed zoning map changes. These maps will be provided to the City
in printed form and on CD-ROM in Auto-CAD or GIS format as directed by the City. The proposed
map changes can be posted on the project web page as duected by staff.
Deliverable: Zoning Map -one (1) digital map and four (4) 3G" x 48" plan copies
Subtask 3.3 Peer-Review by City Staff Team
The City Staff Team will review each of the two Administrative Drafts and provide one (1) set of
consolidated comments using MS WORD "Tracked Changes" to be returned to the Consultant Team.
PMC
P-293
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
PMC will work with the City Planning Staff to coordinate the distribution of materials (in one or more
component parts) and prepaze summaries of significant changes to the draft documents.
Deliverables: City Staff will provide one (1) consolidated set of City comments using MS WORD
Tracked Changes for each Administrative Draft.
Subtask 3.4 Public Draft Development Code and Map
Based upon input and direction from City Staff, PMC will prepare the Pubhc Draft Development Code
and map for public review and distribution. The Public Draft Development Code will include chapter
summaries on page one of each chapter highlighting the significant changes from the existing code to
the proposed update.
Deliverables: Ten (10) copies of the Public Draft Development Code, one (1) electronic copy,
and twenty-five (25) CDs.
Revised Zoning Map -ten (10) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy
Subtask 3.5 Joint PC/CC Workshop
In accordance with the agreed-upon workshop schedule, PMC will coordinate with the City Staff Team
to jointly conduct a workshop with the PC/CC for review of the Draft Development Code.
Deliverables: Twenty (20) copies of the Draft Development Code along with one (1) electronic
copy
Meetings: One (1) public workshop with the Planning Commission and City Counc$
TASK 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS -INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
Subtask 4.1 Prepare Initial Study /Environmental Document
PMC will prepare an Initial Study (IS) for review and edit by City staff, based upon CEQA Guidelines
Appendix G and other studies prepared in and fox Rancho Cucamonga. Our standard IS format includes
a project description and executive summary.
The intent of the IS will be to evaluate and, if warranted, mitigate impacts from the proposed project to a
less than significant level. Given the regulatory nature of the project, mitigation is likely to take the form of
modifications to the proposed ordinance. All potential impacts from the proposed project could be fully
mitigated and the Gty could prepaze a Negative or Mitigated Negative Dedazadon based on the checklist.
PMC will review the administrative draft IS with City staff to make a recommendation and initial
detemvnation of a Negative Dedazation or a Mitigated Negative Declaration is sufficient for review. We
recommend circulating the IS for the requisite 30 days (local review only) during which a public hearing
would be held to discuss the project and the emvironmental impacts. The City aay choose not to circulate
the IS document, however, that public process may significantly influence the environmental
determination. Public review of the IS will lengthen the project schedule by four to six weeks. Altemadvely,
PMC is prepazed to simply work at the staff level to make the environmental detemnnation.
Deliverables: Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration -ten (10) bound copies
and one (1) electronic copy
m - ~ PMC _ __
P-294
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
Subtask 4.2 Preparation of Responses to Comments
At the conclusion of the public review period for either the IS/MND and upon receipt of all written and
oral comments from the public and responsible agencies, PMC will meet with the City to discuss the
appropriate responses to comments. We will provide an EIR standazd format response to comment and
final environmental document for either the IS/MND, to accompany the proposed ordinance change.
Our format includes digital copies of all comments received with all comments numbered, followed by a
response to each comment We also provide revisions to the environmental document and any
additional information pertinent to the record.
For budgeting purposes, we aze estimating up to ten (10) letters that will require responses of varying
detail. PMC will draft proposed responses to comments for review by City staff. Upon City approval of
the responses, ten (10) copies of the final environmental documentation will be delivered to the City.
PMC will prepare, notice, and circulate draft and fmal environmental documents, including all
supporting documentation. Documents shall include, but aze not limited to, Notice of Intent to Adopt,
Initial Study, Responses to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
Deliverables: EIR standazd format response to comment and fmal environmental document
Subtask 4.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)
Concurrent with the draft IS/MND, PMC will prepare a Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)
£ox City review. The MMP will consist of table that presents all mitigation measures, timing oEmitigation
and the parties responsible for implementation and oversight.
Deliverables: bIMI'
Subtask 4.4 Findings of Fact and Notice of Determination
Findings for adoption o£ an IS/b'IND aze not as elaborate as those fox an EIR. Because of the nature of
this ordinance change, our scope includes prepazation of findings suitable for the IS/MND. PMC would
draft the fmdings for City review and use.
Deliverables: All Environmental Documentation
ALTERNATIVE TASK 4 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS - ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN
EIR
PMC's Environmental Lead recommends this alternative approach to environmental analysis because
the addendum to the General Plan EIR is more legally defensible and less costly with fewer
requirements given the recent preparation of the General Plan EIR and the fact that this Development
Code update is intended to implement and be consistent with the City's 2010 General Plan.
Subtask 4.1 Preparation of Draft Addendum
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria fox determining the appropriate
environmental documents, if any, which must be completed when a Final EIR has already been certified
fox a particular project These Guidelines allow a lead agency to pxepaze an Addendum to a Final EIR if
all of the following conditions aze met:
PMC
P-295
- -- -
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
• Substantial changes to the project do not require major revisions to the previously adopted Final
EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects ox a substantial increase in
the severity of previously identiFed potentially significant effects;
• Substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken do
not require major revisions of the previous Final EIR due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects ox a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects;
• No new mitigation measures ox alternatives which axe considered different from those analyzed
in the Final EIR ox which were previously found not to be feasible axe identified;
• No new information of substantial importance becomes available which shows new significant
effects ox significant effects substantially more severe than previously discussed;
• Only minor technical changes ox additions axe necessary to make the Final EIR under
consideration adequate under CEQA; and
• The changes to the Final EIR made by the Addendum do not raise important new issues about
the significant effects on the environment.
PMC will prepaze a Draft Addendum in conformance with CEQA Guidelines. The Draft Addendum
will compare the current Zoning Code Update with the impact analysis and &ndings of the May 2010
General Plan Update Final EIR, concentrating on environmental topics that apply to the proposed
zonting update. PMC will also review the policies of the General Plan and any supporting documents that
either direct, ox support, the proposed changes to the zoning code update. The Draft Addendum will be
submitted to the Planning Depamnent staff for review and comment Upon receiving comments from
City staff, PMC will prepaee the final version of the Addendum that will accompany project documents
during consideration by Planning Commission and City Council.
Deliverables: One (1) electronic copy of the Draft Addendum, and one (1) electronic copy and
two (2) hazdcopies of the fmal version of the Addendum.
Subtask 4.2 Adoption Documents
Vl/bile the Addendum process does not specifically require that the City make environmental fmdings, it
does require that the City provide `substantial evidence' as to why a subsequent EIR was not
appropriate. PMC will draft the fmdings fox review by the City, and assist the staff in preparing the
CEQA component of the staff report(s) needed fox the Zonng Code Update. PMC will also draft a
Notice of Determination. PMC will attend two (2) public hearings, one (1) each before the Planning
Cotmission and City Council, and will be ready to answer questions regarding the CEQA process.
Deliverables: One (1) electronic copy of the Draft Findings and Notice of Determination.
TASK 5 ADOPTION
Subtask 5.1 Public Notification, Circulation, and Response to Inquiries
As indicated in the RFP, RC Team will be responsible for public notification and circulation of project
documents. PMC staff will be available during the circulation period to answer draft document questions.
Deliverables: Public Hearing notices as required by RC Team.
PMC
I
i P-296
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
Subtask 5.2 Planning Commission Hearings
City Staff Team and PMC will provide staff reports and attend public hearings of the Planning
Commission for recommendation and adoption, respectively, of the Final Development Code, Zoning
Map, and CEQA documents.
Deliverables: One (1) draft and one (1) final staff report for Plantilng Commission (City Staff
Team)
Meetings: PMC to attend two (2) public hearings with Plannvtg Commission ($ two (2) public
hearings with the Planning Commission are not needed, the City will only be
charged for the meetings attended by PMC)
Subtask 5.3 City Council Hearings
City Staff Team and PMC will provide staff repons and attend public hearings of the City Council fox
recommendation and adoption, respectively, of the Final Development Code, Zoning Map, and CEQA
documents. City Staff Team will prepaze memo that articulates all suggested modifications by the
Planning Commission.
Deliverables: One (1) draft and one (1) fmal staff report for City Council (City Staff Team)
Meetings: PMC will attend up to two (2) public hearings with City Council (if two (2) public
hearings with the City Council axe not needed, the City will only be chazged for the
meetings attended by PMC)
Subtask 5.4 Final Development Code Document and Zoning Map
PMC will prepare the final version of the Development Code and Zoning Map based on input from the
City Council. PMC will provide additional copies beyond these listed below on a time and material basis.
Deliverables: One (1) camera ready original of the document.
Two (2) sets of CD-ROMs with original Word and GIS files, as well as PDFs of all
materials
Six (6) 34" x 42" copies of the Zoning Map
Six (6) ll" x 17" copies of the Zoning Map
TASK 6 FOLLOW UP AND IMPLEMENTATION
Subtask 6.1 Consistency Analysis for Other Adopted Plans
Once the Development Code is adopted, PMC will conduct consistency analysis to determine the
changes needed to each Specific Plan, Community Plan or Overlay that will bring the plan in
conformance with the Development Code. One of the primary concerns is the nexus between the new
Development Code and the existing, and rather dated specific plans, specifically when it comes to land
uses and development standards. At a minimum, the analysis will determine what uses aze outdated or
inconsistent with the Development Code either by being allowed, ox by permit requirements. There aze
also concems that as residents within certain specific plans want to modify their property (i.e. additions,
patios, etc), the standards are not clearly defined. These aze the types of issues that will be addressed in
the consistency analysis. PMC will review and provide consistent}' analysis for all of the following plans:
PMC __ _ .®
P-297
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK
• Victoria Community Plan
• Etiwanda Specific Plan
• Sub-Area 18 Specific Plan
• Terra Vista Community Plan
• North Etiwanda Specific Plan
• Victoria Gardens Master Plan
• Victoria Axboxs Master Plan • Town Center Master Plan
Deliverables: Consistency analysis between adopted plans and new Development Code
PMC'S AVAILABILITY
PMC has the availabihty to complete this project in less than a year. This will require a focused effort to
keep on track. PMC proposes weekly meetings between key members of the PMC project management
team and RC Team members. These meetings will occur in person when necessary, particularly towards
the begitming of the project when meetings with ke}' staff and community stakeholders are most
important, but some may occur as phone ox video conference calls. Oux current experience with many
of our clients where we have a similar arrangement has worked very well regarding our availability on-
site. There have been no constraints on our availability and quahty of work ox on maintaining budget
limits with this arrangement PMC would expect to have a similaz successful aaangement with the City
of Rancho Cucamonga should we be chosen fox this assignment. For the stakeholders, staff, and elected
interview stages of this project, PMC will schedule sequential meetings with the staff and community
stakeholders to make the most efficient use of the client's time and budget.
COMMUNICATION
PMC is committed to providing the best possible client-consultant relationship and services. As such, in
addition to our attendance at meetings as proposed herein, PMC would recommend that there be
regulazly scheduled conference calls between staff and the Project Manager to discuss feedback,
direction, and planning fox upcoming meetings. We will also maintain xegulac a-mail communication and
provide draft documents for review as specific sections axe available.
m PMC
P-298
0
rn
n
rn
N
O
CD
P-299
PROJECT PERSONNEL
The following principal staff members have been assigned to participate in this project based on their
expertise and direct relevant project experience. Most of the team members have worked as public
agenry planners updating and implementing zoning codes on a daily basis. Full resumes are provided in
Appendix A of this proposal.
We have specifically chosen a small team for this project. We have done this for efficiency of tasks,
accountability, and accuracy. A kitchen with many cooks can become very crowded. Rather, our
approach is to bring experienced, trusted senior staff to the table, people who have experience not only
writing codes but implementing them.
PAM JOHNS, AICP, PROJECT DIRECTOR & MANAGER ~,:
Over the last 15 years, Ms. Johns has managed a wide variety of advance planning projects, ..~
including both comprehensive plans/general plans and zoning codes, and would serve as ~ ,,~~ ~
Project Director & Manager for the project. Her responsibilities would include document ^
review and project quality control. Ms. Johns' recent experience includes project
management of comprehensive Zoning Ordinances for the cities of Elk Grove, Pinole, and ',,
Rancho Cordova and for Inyo County. Additionally, she has prepared dozens of individual
zoning ordinance amendments for special uses (e.g., wireless communications, adult busuiesses, and
second unit), permit processes, and sign regulations.
JEFF BEISWENGER, AICP, ASSISTANT PROJECT MANAGER
Mr. Beiswenger has over 16 years of specialized work experience related to planning ',
implementation documents. He has maintained his professional focus on creating the
planning implementation tools necessary to bring community visions to reality. Working '
in both public agencies and private consulting firms throughout the United States, Mr. 'i,
Beiswenger has prepared several comprehensive plans, zoning ordinances, development
codes, vision plans, master plans, and design guideline documents in 11 different States.
His experience includes the creation of form-based and performance-based development codes. Mr.
Beiswenger's degrees in both architecture and urban planning and his experience developing policy
documents, land use regulations, design guidelines, and site plans result in a unique skill set advantageous
for a wide range of plaunuig services.
MARK BRODEUR, URBAN DESIGN / INFILL ADVISOR
Mark Brodeur will bring his local knowledge of Rancho Cucamonga and the greater Los ~ '
s
Angeles area to the project, as well as his urban design and Form- Based Development .~
Codes for commercial areas. As PMC's urban design and Smart Growth expert, Mr.
Brodeur will also ensure that the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code implements
Smart Growth principles and complements the recently completed General Plan. ,`.
Additionally, Mark has prepared several sign codes.
Mr. Brodeur is a nationally recognized municipal urban design expert. He has over 32 years of experience in
120 towns and cities. His passion is infill revitalization and he is aself-described patron of the Main Street
Program and the New Urbanism. Mr. Brodeur has worked on over 25 publicly-initiated specific plans,
including the regulatory Specific Plans for Foothill Boulevard in Laverne, Rancho Cucamonga and Rialto.
SAM GENNAWEY, PUBLIC OUTREACH LEADER
Sam Gennawey will bring his local knowledge of Rancho Cucamonga that he gained was leading the ~~
Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga community visioning effort and the outreach services for the General Plan.
He has worked with communities throughout the region including Claremont, Rialto, and the County of
PMC
P-300
PROJECT PERSONNEL
San Bernazdino. His role is to make sure the team is constantly checking in with the community and the
City staff and to ensure that the final product reflects the vision and values of Rancho Cucamonga.
Mr. Gennawey has worked on more than 120 urban planning project and has facilitated more than 700
community workshops. Specifically, m Rancho Cucamonga, he collaborated with community leaders to
create the Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga vision statement as well as with City management in the creation
of the Green Team Action Matrix sustainability initiative. Many of his projects have won awards and he
is a frequent speaker at professional conferences.
CHRISTOPHER JORDAN, AICP, SENIOR PLANNER
Mx. Jordan is a senior planner at PMC. His roles and responsibilities include urban design and
land use planning, public agency staffing, and zoning and development code development and
adrnirustration. He serves as a project manager on a variety of advance planning projects
including zoning codes and development codes, general plans, and design guidelines. He also
has extensive experience as an agency planner, having processed dozens of projects including
variances, subdnisions, rezones, design reviews, and general plan amendments.
Mr. Jordan has extensive experience in writing and implementing zoning codes. Most recently, he serned as
the project manager for the Zoning Code updates for the City of Atherton, Ione and Lemoore. Mr. Jordan
has also assisted with the comprehensive Zoning Coded updates for the cities of Rancho Cordova and Elk
Grove. His other related zoning work has included form-based zoning provisions for the cities of Folsom
and Holtville, as well as sign code updates for the cities of San Jose, Colton, and Hemet, and abig-box
ordinance and updates to the adult-oriented business ordinance for the City of Elk Grove.
PATRICK ANGELL, PRINCIPAL/DIRECTOR FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Mr. Angell is a Principal at PMC and oversees the company's Environmental Services Group. He also
serves as a project director and manager and technical analyst for a variety of projects. He specializes in
environmental and urban land use planning, and has performed tasks for projects such as water and
wastewater facilities, energy facilities, flood control projects, residential subdivisions, mixed-use urban
developments, general plans, and redevelopment plans. Mr. Angell's experience includes establishing
environmental review divisions for cities, coordination and facilitation of large-scale private and public
projects, preparing urban land use and growth analysis, recreation and visual resource studies, public
services assessment, transportation and circulation studies, and cultural resource analysis. He has also
been involved in the preparation of several CEQA and NEPA documents and technical studies and has
over 18 years of environmental documentation preparation experience. He will serve as the Project
Director for the environmental analysis of the Development Code update.
DANIEL GRIFFITH, PROJECT MANAGER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Miss Griffith has over has over ten years of progressively responsible experience in planning,
environmental planning and analysis. She has experience in developing long- and short-term plans for
land use, growth and revitalization of urban, suburban, and rural communities. Additionally, she has
written and reviewed a variety of environmental planning documents, including technical reports. She
has worked for both public agencies and private companies. She will serve as the lead for the preparation
of the environmental analysis for the Development Code update.
Additional Staff Resources
The above list represents the staff which PMC anticipates will be required, however it is possible that the
need for additional staff may arise. Therefore PMC may assign additional staff types as necessary to complete
the services required under this agreement. Compensation rates for additional staff types will be determined
® PMC
P-301
PROJECT PERSONNEL
by PMC and will be consistent with the rates listed herein. Assig[mtent of additional staff will not change the
budget of this agreement, unless agreed upon by both parties with the execution of an amendment
The client may not during the term of the project, nor for a period of one year thereafter, solicit for
employment, hire ox retain, whether as an employee or independent contractor, any person who is or
has been employed by PMC. Should the client desire to hire PMC's employee, equitable compensation
for the loss of such employee will be due to PMC by the client.
PMC understands that any work product created for, and delivered to the Client will become the property of
the Client. PMC resett~es the right to use work we created (including images, concepts or ideas) solely for the
purpose of displaying samples of work to potential clients as an example of PMC's creative capability.
PMC
-- it
P-302
m
m
w
a
fJ
c
W
n
w_
0
fA
P-303
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
PMC INTRODUCTION
PMC is dedicated to serving the needs of cities, counties, and other governmental agencies by providing
a complementary range of municipal support and management services. PMC has offices in Chico, Mt.
Shasta, Davis, Rancho Cordova, Oakland, San Diego, Montetey, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and other
projectlocadons.
PMC provides to our clients comprehensive environmental services; regulatory permitting assistance;
contract staff assistance; strategic planning services; public affairs and public relations; resource
management; general and specific plan (including housing element) preparation, updates, and
implementation; zoning code preparation, updates, and enforcement; design guidelines;
LAFCo/annexation services; fiscal and impact fee studies; infrastructure and facility finance plaxming;
geographic information systems; and all aspects of current and advance planning assistance. The firm
was established in 1995 with a mission to provide planning, environmental, and municipal services to
public agencies, special districts, and public-oriented organizations, and has provided service to more
than 200 cities, counties, and special districts throughout California. The company has grown steadily
and today consists of over 100 employees working out of its nine primary offices.
Environmental pia^^~ a, project management, and lead agenry compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Polity Act (NEPA) aze pximazy
municipal services pro~zded by PMC. Servutg as a specialized extension of agency staff, PMC is recognized
as an innovative and responsible thud party in the management of multi-jurisdictional programs and the
preparation and processing of envuonrnental assessments, visual impact studies, initial studies,
envuotunental impact reports, and other technical studies. PMC's staff includes in-house biologists with a
full range of capabilities and a Cultural Resources group with extensive experience in cultural resource
analysis. If needed, PMC's environmental professionals axe able to expedite oux.dients' critical submittals
to the State through direct access and close proximity to the bill room at the State Capitol for legislative
updates, the State Clearinghouse, and the Governor's Office of Planninao and Research.
PMC also provides long-term and temporary planning assistance for a diverse range of agencies in
California, including Waal communities and urban centers. With our public agency orientation, we avoid
any conflicts of interest and have no contractual relationships with the development community in these
areas. With a municipal focus, PMC continues to assist governmental agencies in looking for more
creative and efficient ways to maximize limited fiscal resources. The use of PMC's services, staff
resources, and technical assistance is a viable option to meet the ever-changing demands placed on local,
regional, and state agencies.
PMC
P-304
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The following lisi highlights a few of PMC's similar zoning and development code projects.
ATHERTON ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC completed a comprehensive update to the City of Atherton's 'Coning Code. "The update focused
on reorganization and simplification of the City's zoning provisions to provide clarity and improve
readability. The code was also updated to reflect changes rn State and federal law and to respond to
citizen, policy rnaker, and staff concerns and issues. Numerous graphics were created and incorporated
to help explain and illustrate the process and provisions of the code.
RANCHO CORDOVA COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC was hired to help the new City_ of Rancho
Cordova develop their first Zoning Code to implement
the new vision for the City as outlined in the recently
adopted General Plan. Rancho Cordova today is a
jobs-rich community with a diverse population, an
aging housing stock, and room to grow. Located
centrally in the Sacramento region, Rancho Cordova
wants a balanced and connected communit}' with a
strong sense of place in a vibrant urban setting. The
Zoning Code will incorporate mixed use and City
center districts, form-based zoning for target areas, and
a ~C'eb-based interactive zoning code and map.
Preparation Date: Adopted February 2009
Client Contact: Ted Gaebler, City Manager, (916) 851-8800
RANCHO CORDOVA, FOLSOM BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AND FORM-BASED CODE
As part of our work staffing the Plaruung Department for the City of Rancho Cordova, PMC prepared a
Specific Plan document for the Folsom Boulevard Corridor, an aging commercial corridor and light rail
artery that serves as the lifeblood of the community. The Specific Plan document draws upon numerous
past planning efforts solidifying the vision of Folsom Boulevard and brings the vision to reality.
PMC worked closely with a City-appointed
task force/steering committee and developed
a comprehensive public participation plan that
is focused on results. This project included a
strong development strategy using existing
data, a market study-, and stakeholder
interviews to recommend implementation
measures for specific "pulse points" along
Folsom Boulevard.
The Folsom Bouevard Specific Plan includes a land use and design plan that integrates form-based
zoning provisions in terms of site-specific nodes, prototypes, and case studies and provides guidelines
and standards to ensure the plan's proper execution. Accompanying this design plan is a Vision Poster
visually depicting corridor improvements and concepts solely for the purpose of "showing" rather than
® PMC
P-305
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
just "tellutg" the envisioned future of the Botilevard. The plan also includes districts/themes for the
corridor including integration of the Downtown, realistic right-of--way improvements that incorporate
provisions to address the relationship and integration of public and private realms, and an
implementation/action plan that incorporates the cost of planned infrastructure and development.
Preparation Date: Phase L• Adopted November 2006; Phase 2: Adopted May- 2008
Client Contact: Ted Gaebler, City Manager, (916) 851-8800
ELK GROVE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
I'MC completed a new "Loring Code for the City of Elk Grove to implement the City's first General
Plan. As the fastest growing city in the nation, Elk Grove is facing tremendous demands to
accommodate growth and to ensure that the growth is in keeping with the desires of the community.
Primary tasks included introduction of mixed-use provisions, evaluation of allowed use provisions,
elimination of antiquated districts, v~corporation of new special use regulations, update to general site
development regulations, and reorganization of the Zoning Code for ease of use. PMC also prepared the
City's General Plan and Citywide Design Guidelines.
Preparation Date: Adopted June 2006
Client Contact: Cody Tubbs, Deputy City Manager, (916) 478-2201
GREENFIELD COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC completed a comprehensive update to the Zoning Code for the City of Greenfield. The primarq
purpose of the update was to ensure consistency with the City's new General Plan. Other ke}' elements
of the update included updating zoning districts, allowed use, and development standards, establishing a
new TND District for traditional neighborhood development, and establishing special use provisions.
Several regulations also needed to be updated for consistency with state law.
Preparation Date: :ldopted December 2006
Client Contact. Mark McClain, Building Official/Planning 1\lanager, (831) 674-2635
HOLTVILLE DOWNTOWNCODE
PMC prepared the form-based zoning provisions for the City of
Holtt-ille in Imperial County, California. The provisions cover both
Downtown and the larger central business district and cover a range
of topics including allowed use provisions, building envelope, signs,
landscaping, and architectural character and fot~n. To implement the
new provisions, PMC created two new zoning districts and a new
Design Review process for the City.
Preparation Date: Adopted April 2009
Client Contact: Laura Fischer, City Manager, (760) 356-4574
PMC
i
1
P-306
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
ZONE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC recently completed a comprehensn~e update to the Zoning Code for the Gty of Ione. The update
invoh~ed a complete restmcntring, reorganization, and rewrite of the existing provisions, including the creation
of new admuvstrative provisions, expanded allowed use provisions, and the first signage regulations for the Gry.
A new overlay zoning dissect with provisions for azchitecnual chazacter and detail for the Downtown was ako
created. This was the first comprehensive update to the code in the 50 years since it was first adopted.
Preparation Date: Adopted Apri12009
Client Contact: Kimberly Kerr, City Manager, (209) 274-2412
IONE ZONING CODE UPDATE FOR GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Following the fast comprehensive update to the City's General Plan in 27 years, PMC prepared a series
of targeted amendments to Ione's Zoning Code for consistency with the new General Plan. The update
focused on the creation of four new Zoning Districts and the rezoning of neazly 200 parcels.
Preparation Date: Adopted November 2009
Client Contact Kimberly Kea, City Manager, (209) 274-24]2
ZONE LAND DIVISION (SUBDIVISION) CODE UPDATE
PMC prepared a comprehensive update to the City of Ione's subdivision regulations, called the Land Division
Code The update was focused on ensuring consistenry between the Code, the State Subdivision Map Act,
and the City's new General Plan. The update was completed in less than four months and has aeated a
number of efficienues in how proposed subdivisions aze processed. Included in the update were revisions to
the City's Quimby Ordinance for parkland dedication and design standazds for new subdivisions.
Preparation Date: Adopted Febmaxy 2010
Client Contact: Kimberly Kexx, City Manager, (209) 274-2412
MANTECA COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC is preparing a comprehensive update to the City of Manteca's Zoning Code.
Preparation Date: Ongoing (work commenced October 2009)
Client Contact: Rochelle Henson, (209) 239-3427
PINOLE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC was hired to prepaze a comprehensive zoning update for the City of Pinole. The new Zoning Code
will reflect new policies of the General Plan, ensure compliance with applicable state and federal laws,
and update the allowed use and development regulations throughout the city. In addition, PMC will
create context-based (form-based) zoning solutions for the Downtown that emulate the existing desired
development patterns and allow more flexibility in the allowed uses throughout the Downtown azea.
Preparation Date: Ongoing (work commenced August 2006)
Client Contact: Winston Rhodes, (510) 724-8912
® _ _ _ _ _ _ PMC -_ --____ _ _
P-307
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
WINTERS FORM-BASED CODE FOR DOWNTOWN
As an implementation piece to the Downtown Winters Master Plan, PMC was retained to develop a special
zoning district tha[ incorporates form-based code standazds and design guidelines that focus on creating a
lively, axchitectuxally complementary, and pedestrian-oriented commercial district and infill residential azea.
Standards for land use, density, setbacks, and design aze set out in a zoning code-like format that can be
referenced easily by project applicants and designees and cited easily by City staff and officials.
The "DowntownCode" included:
• Regulating Plan illustrating the location of uses, pubhc spaces, and special features.
• Budding Form Standards governing basic budding form, placement, and fundamental elements
to ensure that all buildings complement neighboring stmcmres and the street. These standards
were based upon study of building types appropriate for the \X/intexs region, our climate, and
community vitality.
• Architectural Standards guiding exterior materials and quality to preserve and enhance the
historic Downtown chazacter.
Preparation Date: Adoption pending (work commenced January 2008)
Client Contact: John W. Donlevy, Jr., City Manager, (530) 795-4910
INYO COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ZONING CODE UPDATE
PMC was hired by the County to prepare a comprehensive text amendment to the County Zotilng Code
for the purpose of implementing the 2001 General Plan and fixing several staff-identified problems with
the existing zoning regulations (e.g., permit processes, roles fox interpretations, allowed use provisions,
development standazds, and special use regulations). That draft document was provided to the County
fox consideration and adoption, along with Subdivision Regulations and Environmental Guidelines.
PMC was also hired recently to assist the County with amendments to their General Plan and
corresponding changes to the Draft Zoning Code Update.
Preparation Date: Pending Adoption
Client Contact: Pat Cecil, Planning Manager, (760) 878-0263
TWENTYNINE PALMS, DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION SPECIFIC PLAN
PMC is preparing the Downtown Specific Plan for the City of Twentynine Palms to guide and attract
new development in the Downtown. The Speci&c Plan project focuses on ensuring economic vitality
Downtown; suppoxti ng a diverse concentrate on of activities; making Downtown a safe and comfortable
place for pedestrians, bicychsts and vehicles; and celebrating art and culture in the Downtown, PMC is
working with City staff ,stakeholders, the Redevelopment Agency and Caltrans to develop the Specific
Plan. The plan wffi employ the following tools to revitalize Downtown and realize the community's
vision Eox a vibrant center:
• Goals and policies to guide development decisions and promote the community's desires.
• t1 detailed land use plan that provides new land use designations appropriate fox [he Downtown
area and an easy-to-understand table of allowable uses.
PMC
®.
P-308
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
• The DowntownCode, which provides
standards to regulate the uses and building
forms of all new development.
• Streetscape improvements to calm traffic,
activate public space and invite
pedestrians, cyclists and drivers into the
Downtown.
• .fin assessment of the public facilities and
infrastructure and an}• improvements
needed to support the Land uses described
in the Specific Plan.
• An action plan to implement the goals and policies, and outline the timelines, responsible parties
and funding source for each of the actions completed.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT CODE
(COMPLETED BY MARK BRODEUR WHILE WORKING FOR A PREVIOUS EMPLOYER AND JACOBSON & WACK)
While working for a previous employer, Mark Brodeur
completed an award winning Development Code for the City
of San Bernardino. The Code consolidates development
standards, subdi~rision regulations and design guidelines into a
single document. The Code won a National ?tP:'1 as>ard.
..~.. .
® PMC
P-309
0
rn
n
m
a
c
m
P-310
PROJECT SCHEDULE
I .
M 1 W: 1 1 ~': f l 1 1' I I
r ~ ~
Task 1 Project Kick Off
1.1 Projec( Kick Ofl and Key Is~ues Dc;nssicn
1.2 Scope Revisions
ask 2 Issue Iderttlff
2.1 Java Collection. Review, and Evaluation
2.2 Analysis of Code Issues and Alterantives
2.3 Work Session with PMC and RC Team
2.4 Preparation o1 Annotated Outline
2.5 Public Workshops
26 Stakeholder Meetings
ask 9 Drag Code Update and EmironmenW Review
3 1 Administrative Draft Development Code
3.2 Drah Zoning Map Changes
3.3 City Staff Review
3.4 Public Draft Development Code and Map
3.5 Jaint Study Session
ask 4 F.nvkonmentad Review
Task 5 Public Review and Adoption
5.1 Notification. Circulation. Response Io Comments
5.2 Planning Commission Hearings
5? City DC'JnCll Hearings
;1 Fina~ ~1~af1 Cod+: ~:~~~d fa!ap
Task 6 Follow Up and Implementation
6 1 Interactive V~Icb ~~asec Devr_~IOpmsnt Code aid Map
6.2 Consistency Analysis for Other Adop[ed Pians
*= Meeting
FMC
P-311
m
a
X
n
N
C
CD
N
T' ' `~
.+ ~
Pam Johns, AICP
Project Director & Manager
Education
B.S., City and Regional Planning, Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
Urban Design Program, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czechoslovakia
Experience and Current Responsibilities
Ms. Johns has over 16 years of progressively responsible experience in planning and project management, and possesses a unique
combination of strong technical, analytical, and organizational skills. Ms. Johns' primary responsibilities include management and
preparation of policy and regulatory planning documents, urban design projects, facilitation of public meetings, development
application review, environmental planning, and management of implementation programs.
Relevant Project Experience
• City of Chico, General Plan -Project manager for the city's comprehensive General Plan update. Project focus on
sustainable design and resource management, infill and new growth areas, downtown revitalization, and infrastructure and
service planning.
^ City of Rancho Cordova, General Plan -Project manager far the preparation of the city's first General Plan, including
smart growth principles, detailed market analysis, land use modeling, and business pro forma. SACOG Regional
Excellence Award and CCAPA Award.
^ City of Los Altos, General Plan - Co-managed the update of the General Plan to reevaluate each plan element. Facilitated
community workshops and responsible for writing the General Plan update.
• City of Elk Grove, General Plan -Prepared the Economic Development Element for the adoption of the General Plan for
the new City of Elk Grove.
• Inyo County, General Plan Amendment- Project manager far the focused amendment of the County General Plan.
^ City of Oakley, General Plan -Prepared the Open Space and Conservation Element for the General Plan.
^ County of Napa, General Plan -Planner responsible for writing the Urban Design Element of the General Plan.
^ City of Atherton, Zoning Code Update -Project manager for a comprehensive update to the City's Zoning Code, including
reorganization, new administration procedures, new provisions for infill and redevelopment, and clarification of provisions
throughout with liberal use of graphics and illustrations.
^ City of Elk Grove, Zoning Cade Update -Project manager responsible for development of the first Comprehensive Zoning
Code for the incorporated City of Elk Grove to implement the newly adapted General Plan and establish innovative and
flexible zoning provisions.
^ City of Folsom, Zoning Code Update - As senior planner for the City, authored and managed a comprehensive Zoning
Cade Update (Planning Commission Draft not adopted).
• City of La Mirada, Zoning Code Update - Co-managed the comprehensive update of the City's Zoning Cade. Responsible
for organizing and writing the document update.
P-312
PMC~
Pam Johns, AICP
Project Director & Manager
• Inyo County, Zoning Code Update -Project manager responsible for a comprehensive update to the County Zoning Code
to implement the General Plan and update antiquated zoning regulations.
• Inyo County, Subdivision Ordinance Update -Project manager responsible for updating the County's subdivision
regulations.
• City of Pinole, Zoning Code Update -Project manager responsible for the comprehensive update to the City's Zoning
Code, including the development of form-based zoning provisions for the city's central core area.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Zoning Cade Update -Project manager responsible for the development of the City's first
Zoning Code, including the development oiform-based zoning provisions and an interactive zoning code and map.
• City of Yuba City, Sign Code Amendments -Project manager working with Sign Committee to update a variety of
provisions in the City's Sign Code.
• City of Folsom, Housing Element Implementation -Prepared new and modified ordinances (e.g., emergency shelter,
second unit, design review) and conducted analysis of several land use amendments. Project advisor for amendments to
the City's Historic District for accessory structures, second dwelling units, signs, and nonresidential uses in residential
areas.
• San Joaquin County, Woodbridge Special Purpose Plan -Project manager responsible for establishing development
standards and design guidelines for nonresidential development in the community's historic commercial core.
• City of Elk Grove, Design Guidelines - Co-managed the establishment of a design review process for the City of Elk
Grove, including the preparation of Citywide Design Guidelines for residential subdivisions, master plans, multi-family
projects, and nonresidential development.
• City of Folsom, Multi-Family Design Guidelines -Staff planner assigned to work with an ad hoc committee to establish
design guidelines for multi-family development.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Design Review Ordinance -Special projects manager for the City to expand the scope and
applicability of the design review process for the newly incorporated City.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Design Guidelines -Project manager for the development of citywide Design Guidelines for the
City of Rancho Cordova. Design Guidelines are applicable to residential subdivisions, master plans, multi-family
projects, and all nonresidential development.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Focused Rezoning -Project manager for the rezoning of more than 800 properties in targeted
areas of the city to ensure zoning consistency with the General Plan and to provide new mixed-use development
opportunities with the development of new mixed-use zoning districts. This project was completed in eight weeks.
• City of Folsom, Bikeway Master Plan-Authored and managed the update of the Bikeway Master Plan which established a
comprehensive trail system, including cost estimates and funding options for implementation in 1994.
• City of Folsom, Specific Plans-As senior planner for the City, managed the adoptioNamendment and implementation of
several large specific plan areas (The Parkway, Empire Ranch, and Prairie Oaks).
• Calaveras County, Specific Plan -Project manager far the County to review and process the Oak Canyon Ranch Specific
Plan project, amixed-use resort project with 2,250 residential units.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Folsom Boulevard Specific Plan -Project director for development of a comprehensive
revitalization plan for the 4-mile commercial corridor. The project included award-winning outreach efforts, market
analysis, retail strategies, form-based zoning, and a new streamlined permit process.
P-313
Page 2
Pam Johns, AICP
Project Director & Manager
• City of Rancho Cordova, Rio del Oro Specific Plan -Project manager for the 3,880-acre Rio del Oro Specific Plan project
comprising 11,600 residential units, neighborhood-serving Village Centers, a Local Town Center, regional shopping and
employment areas, as well as schools, parks and open space.
• City of Elk Grove, Civic Center Project -Project manager for the comprehensive community outreach for programming
and ultimately designing the City's first Civic Center. The project includes statistically valid phone surveying, live polling
at workshops, stakeholder interviews for partnership opportunities and testing market realities, and coordination with a
world-renowned designer.
• City of Elk Grove, Rural Roads Project- Project manager for the outreach effort and ultimate development of new policies
and standards to preserve the rural character of rural neighborhoods located in one of the fastest growing communities in
California.
• City of Livermore, Housing Implementation Program -Contract staff responsible far analysis and staff report preparation
of all housing allocation applications in accordance with criteria adopted for the City's Housing Implementation Program.
• City of Folsom, Development Applications - As City staff, managed all types of development applications, including
variances, use permits, subdivision maps, design review, planned development permits, specific plans, rezones, and
general plan amendments. Responsible far department coordination, environmental analysis, staff reports, and meetings.
• City of Livingston, Contract Staff -Contract staff for current planning projects and special project, including Design
Guidelines and Zoning Ordinance updates.
• City of Walnut Creek, Contract Staff -Contract planner for various current planning projects. Responsible for
environmental analysis and staff report preparation.
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
American Institute of Certified Planners
Urban Land Institute
P-374
Page 3
Jeffrey S. Beiswenger, AICP
Assistant Project Manager
Education
Master of Urban Planning, University of Illinois, Department of Urban Planning, Urbana-Champaign
Bachelor of Architecture, University of Arizona, College of Architecture, Tucson
Experience and Current Responsibilities
Mr. Beiswenger has aver 16 years of professional planning experience working in bath public agencies and private consulting firms
throughout the United States. Mr. Beiswenger has prepared comprehensive plans, zoning codes, form-based codes, specific plans,
master plans, redevelopment plans, and design guideline documents. His education in architecture and urban planning and his
experience developing policy documents, land use regulations, and aesthetic design provisions result in a unique skill set
advantageous for a wide range of planning services.
Relevant Project Experience
Urban Design (Specific Plans, Master Plans and Development Plans)
^ Westborough Specific Plan, City of Rancho Cordova, CA - Mr. Beiswenger serves as the City's project manager for this
1,200-acre mixed-use project, including 800 acres of residential neighborhoods, 90 acres of commercial, and 100 acres
of mixed use designed as atransit-oriented development featuring a new light rail transit stop.
^ Capital Village Special Planning Area, City of Rancho Cordova, CA -Winner of the 2009 California APA Best Project
Award and the 2008 SACOG Blueprint Award . Mr. Beiswenger served as the City's project manager for this 117-acre
mixed-use project, with 827 dwelling units and over 300,000 square feet of commercial space, in the heart of Rancho
Cordova's new Downtown District.
^ Pleasant Valley Concept Plan, Community Development Department, Gresham, OR -Worked with amulti-jurisdictional
team to complete this master plan for 1,500 acres southwest of Gresham and was primarily responsible for the public
involvement plan, the project Web site, and implementation strategies.
^ United Homes, Brooks Farms Subdivision, Lane Kendig, Inc., Lake County, IL-Designed this subdivision using cluster
and performance zoning techniques. Over 5D percent of the site was left undisturbed, protecting natural resources.
Policy, Implementation and Design Documents
^ Development Code Update, City of Lemoore, California -Comprehensive Update to the City's development code to
implement the newly adopted General Plan.
^ Zoning Code Update, Campbell County, Wyoming -Updated the zoning code for this county described as "The Energy
Capital of the World." This was the county's first update since the early 1980s.
^ Downtown Mixed Use District, City of Anderson, CA -This form-based code establishes regulations to guide future
design and development of property within the downtown of this northern California community.
^ Comprehensive Zoning Code Update, City of Rancho Cordova, CA -The City of Rancho Cordova, California, incorporated
in 2003 and the Zoning Code implements the award-winning Smart Growth General Plan.
P-315
PMC"
Jeffrey S. Beiswenger, AICP
Assistant Project Manager
• Rancho Cordova Design Guidelines, City of Rancho Cordova, CA-Comprehensive design guidelines for all development
within the community to improve functional and aesthetic characteristics.
• Development Code Update and Design Review Handbook, City of Forest Grove, OR -Supervised the complete rewrite of
the Development Code since 1980). As part of the Development Code update, Mr. Beiswenger authored a Design Review
Handbook to be used by commercial and multi-family residential developers.
• ESEE Analysis (Goat 5, Natural Resources), City of Forest Grove, OR -Worked with jurisdictions in the Tualatin Basin to
develop abasin-wide ESEE analysis and Goal 5 program. Authored the ESEE Analysis for eight sub-watersheds and
developed program recommendations to protect natural resources while allowing economic development activities.
Supervised consultant who conducted environmental assessments and mapping tasks.
• UGB Expansion Report, City of Forest Grove, OR - Authored a report to convince the Metro Council to add "Exclusive
Farm Use (EFU)" land to the UGB in exchange for removing land in another location. This "swap" helped the City add
new land for development and complete critical road connections while protecting natural resources.
• Housing Mix Plan, Community Development Department, City of Gresham, OR -Developed zoning code standards to
alleviate concerns over multi-family housing in a struggling neighborhood, including design standards and mixed-use
incentives.
• Infill Development & Design Standards, Community Development Department, City of Gresham, OR -Worked with
steering committee and a consultant team to explore strategies for improving compatibility of infill development in
established neighborhoods.
• Industrial and Commercial Lands Analysis, City of Gresham, OR - Completed a land supply analysis for the city of all
available industrial and commercial land available, including an assessment of land likely to infill or redevelop. This
analysis was used to determine whether an urban growth boundary expansion was necessary to meet future growth.
• Rockwood Urban Renewal Plan, City of Gresham, OR -Completed the data and GIS analysis necessary to delineate the
Rockwood Urban Renewal Plan boundary and identify land use supply issue for various types of future land use
scenarios. The analysis helped form the basis for the Rockwood Urban Renewal Plan.
• Residential Capacity Analysis, City of Gresham, OR - Completed a detailed assessment of all land available for
residential development in the city for future residential development. Assessment included the potential for infill and
redevelopment. The analysis was part of Metro Functional Plan implementation of the 2040 Concept Plan, which required
that communities within the Metro area demonstrate that existing residentially zoned land had adequate capacity to
accommodate future residential growth.
• Unified Development Code, Lane Kendig, Inc., New Castle County, DE - Completed a new Unified Development Code
within asix-month time period. A moratorium was placed on new development until the code was adopted.
• 135th Street Corridor Study, BWR Corporation, City of Leawood, KS -Worked with a steering committee of City
Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners, neighborhood residents, and City staff to develop zoning and design
regulations for this important commercial corridor.
P-316
Page 2
P-317
Mark Brodeur, FIUD
Urban Design / Infill Advisor
Education
B.S., Landscape Architecture, College of Environmental Science & Forestry, State University of New York
Graduate Studies, Urban Design and Architecture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
In a nutshell
Mark Brodeur's passion is downtown revitalization. In his 30+ years of planning experience, he has revitalized and re-energized
over 100 downtowns to success. Since Mark first accepted a director post in 1979, he has been helping to set strategies to
accomplish each project's mission and vision. Visioning workshops, one-on-one sessions, cross-discipline task forces, and
middle-of-the-night epiphanies are all invoked as appropriate. Implementation follows with a detailed roadmap and a tool kit: plan,
schedule, budget, inspire, and mast of all, keep that sense of humor. Check!
As a city planner in two gritty blue-collar mill towns in New England, Mark found his calling for restoring central business districts.
He creates a specific formula unique to each downtown, and it works like a charm every time. Unlike many downtown specialists,
he is an urban designer with a flair and a keen eye for implementation tactics, and he uses his comprehensive understanding of
historic preservation and economic development to get the job done.
He walks the blocks and knows the talk. He currently serves as the President of the California Downtown Association. Mark has
always been an advocate for downtowns and is continuously challenging the issue of suburban sprawl. He states a preference to
reduce consumption of less constrained greenfield areas by redesigning and intensifying the urban area to function more efficiently.
He frequently points to downtown revitalization as the historic "urban sustainability."
Introduced to the National Main Street Program over 25 years ago, Mark has emerged as an expert in the Main Street Approach. He
has prepared downtown plans for several Main Street communities and is happy to say that two of his downtowns (Coronado and
Encinitas) have won the prestigious Great American Main Street Award.
At this point in most consultants' careers, several have followed the steady path of becoming a manager, owner, or director. Mark
has already walked in those shoes and is happiest getting in the fray, rolling up his sleeves, and actually designing downtowns. At
PMC, the owners recognize and highly respect his abilities, and they have let Mark do what he laves to do best -focus all his
energy on downtown revitalization. So, when Mark says he has worked in over 100 downtowns, he has actually "worked" in the
area, walked those streets, talked to the people, and implemented the plan. Mark's work speaks for itself.
Accomplished Projects
^ Urban Core Specific Plan, Chula Vista, CA -Encompassing the City's entire west side, this plan was more that a
downtown specific plan. Coming on the heels of a series of transit-oriented General Plan goals and objectives, the Plan
sought to implement urban densities in a historically suburban setting. The plan process included developing a popular
vision for the area before embarking on the regulatory heart of the Specific Plan. The plan was supported by a full traffic
study, economic analysis and extensive outreach process. Several meetings and workshops were held with an advisory
group and the public. A project website was also incorporated far additional public input. The plan area was broken down
into three distinct urban districts. The Village (traditional downtown area), the Grand Boulevard (H Street Corridor) and
the Promenade Area (Broadway Corridor to I-5 Freeway). The Plan was crafted using 10 Key Principles which included
everything from pedestrian friendliness to Transit Oriented Development.
• Downtown (Orange Avenue) Specific Plan, Coronado, CA -What does Coronado do to celebrate is win as the Year 2000
Best Main Street Community? It goes out and writes a plan on how to protect this delicate Village area. Following
extensive public outreach involving interviews, workshops, image preference surveys, a Specific Plan was created which
PMCF
Mark Brodeur, FIUD
Urban Design / Infill Advisor
effectively protects the valuable historic and economic resources of the downtown area. Specific and unique development
standards and a set of design standards were developed to supplement and replace those of the City's Zoning Code. As it
turns out, the projects Ihat were being rejected met all current zoning. Therefore, the City knew they had to fix this
problem. Two major issues were prohibiting further mixed use and lowering the building height. The Specific Plan guides
future land uses permitted along the length of Orange Avenue, to preserve the quaint commercial character which is a
favorite of local and tourists alike. The Design Guidelines are intended to promote a desired level and intensity of future
development Ihal does not overwhelm the street.
Downtown Redding Specific Plan, Redding, CA -This Specific Plan for the traditional downtown district in Redding
serves to implement the General Plan. By enhancing pedestrian orientation, and improving parking and circulation, this
plan aimed to encourage private investment in the downtown. A major feature of the plan was dealing with the disposition
of the aging indoor Downtown Mall. Built in the 1970's, the occupancies were dominated by thrift stores and
governmental office uses. To make matters worse unlike most cities, which simply closed their Main Streets to traffic,
Redding took that one step further and actually enclosed the Mall with a roof. The final Plan proposed bold, significant
changes to this outdated structure. As controversial as the proposals seemed, the City Council backed the Plan knowing
it had to do so to save the Downtown from further economic decline. Plan features include specific district zoning
regulations, sign overlays and a specific implementation program for the eventual demolition and replacement of the
Mall.
• Downtown Roseville Specific Plan, Roseville, CA - Mr. Brodeur is currently working with City officials, a citizen steering
committee, and the public to create a Specific Plan that incorporates our proprietary downtown code, private and public
design guidelines, implementation strategies, and environmental documentation. The downtown code approach, which
blends Euclidean zoning, form-based zoning, municipal (non-zoning) ordinances, and Smart Code regulations in a
graphics-heavy formal, recognizes that Downtown Roseville is a distinct place and, therefore, should have distinct
regulations. Plan strategies are supported by economic, transportation, and environmental analyses.
P-318
Page 2
P-319
Samuel Gennawey
Public Outreach Leader
Education
BA Liberal Arts with a concentration in Urban Planning, DePaul University Chicago
Experience and Current Responsibilities
Mr. Gennawey has led over 100 projects and successfully facilitated more than 700 public meetings and is considered a highly
effective consensus builder and communicator. He has extensive experience with long-range policy documents; General and Specific
Plans, Design Guidelines, Transportation Plans, and Strategic Plans. Throughout his career he has demonstrated an ability to work with
municipalities and the private sector to forge strong working relationships and partnerships with community stakeholders.
PMC responsibilities include supporting the community engagement and facilitation team on a variety of projects, planning for
meetings and events, developing vision statements and strategic long range planning documents, and facilitating discussions and
recording and summarizing community feedback.
Relevant Project Experience
• Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Mr. Gennawey was the Project Manager for the first General Plan in California that
fully integrates a healthy mind, body, and Earth. The Plan is based on the Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga Vision Statement.
The Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga was developed through an grassroots campaign, which included extensive stakeholder
interviews and focus groups, a volunteer polling process called Visioneering as well as a telephone poll, and more than
45 workshops with local community groups. In addition, the General Plan is easy to read and easy to use.
Claremont General Plan. The City of Claremont is famous for its "trees and PhDs." Home to the Claremont Colleges, the
population is sophisticated, knowledgeable, and engaged. Mr. Gennawey was responsible for the public outreach and
the development of the City's Vision Statement. Working with an advisory committee made up of more than 100 people,
he was able to break down the process and give each member a meaningful role. The result was one of the first General
Plans in California to be based on sustainability as a core value as well as a remapping the city along historic
development patterns to define how the city should look and feel in the future. The Plan has won multiple American
Planning Association Awards and has been held up as a model by many communities.
• Ventura Planning Commission and Staff Retreat. Conflicts between City staff and Commissioners are common.
However, in the case of Ventura, it was truly getting in the way of how the City would be governed and was hurting the
local economy. Through a series of organizational development workshops prepared and facilitated by Mr. Gennawey,
the group was able to work through their differences and to better understand each others roles. The result was a more
streamlined development process that protected the character of this unique community while allowing for development
that enhanced, embellished or repaired the public realm.
City of Los Angeles/HACLA Jordan Downs SCAG Compass Blueprint Grant. The challenge presented by the SCAG Compass
Blueprint grant was to empower the local residents to develop a vision statement that would reflect their values and needs
and become the foundation for the Specific Plan that would be used to implement that vision. For many years, design
professionals had worked hard on the development of a master plan for one of the poorest communities in Southern
California. To make the transition from the master plan to the specific plan, Mr. Gennawey worked with representatives of the
community in a series of workshops that allowed them to draft a statement that truly reflects their desires and allowed them
to become the project advocates far good functional design. He broadened this outreach to include the local Neighborhood
Council and other community groups that surrounded the project to create a truly inclusive plan.
PMC®
----~~
SamuelGennawey
Public Outreach Leader
• City of Monrovia Station Square Specific Plan. As Project Manager for this award winning Specific Plan (APA and SCAG
Compass Blueprint), Mr. Gennawey developed an inclusive community outreach process that dealt with sensitive issues
such as displacement of current residents and business, traffic, safety, and fhe need for measured economic growth. This
process followed on the footsteps of his work in updating the City's General Plan. The result is a Cully integrated mixed-
use development with residential, commercial, retail, open-space, and transit. The plan is designed to complement the
existing central business district to the north.
Previous Experience
• Community Visioning
- City of Riverside"
- City of West Covina`
- City of San Buenaventura (Ventura) Creative Cities Charrette"
- Sierra Club South Orange County Visioning Workshop"
- City of Long Beach Strategic Plan: Vision 2020
- City of Avalon Community Focus Group Facilitation"
- City of Chula Vista Visioning Project`
- County of Orange South County Outreach and Review Effort (SCORE) -Rancho Mission Viejo
- City of Westlake Village Strategic Plan and Visioning
- San Gabriel Valley COG Growth Visioning'
- SANDAG Smart Growth Visioning
- City of Rancho Cucamonga "Spirit of Rancho Cucamonga" Road Show'
• Education
- Los Angeles City Col lege Satellite Campus Viability and Demand Study"
- Los Angeles City College Van decamps Satellite Campus Need Analysis`
- Los Angeles Community Colleges Off-campus Lands Policy Study"
- West Los Angeles College Airport Center Needs Analysis and Illustrative Master Plan
- State of California- Parks and Recreation Strategic Planning for Interpretation of Los Encinos State Historic Park`
• Environmental
- City of Huntington Beach -Pacific City EIR
- City of Rancho Palos Verde-Point View Project EIR
- Caltrans On-call Services Statewide for Environmental Technical Studies
- Oceanview School District Public Meeting Facilitation"
- City of Huntington Beach - Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse EIR Scoping Meeting
- City of Reno Green Summit
- City of Rancho Cucamonga Green Team Action Matrix Facilitation"
- City of San Bernardino Regional Energy Efficiency Project
- Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Supplemental EIR Facilitation`
• General Plans
- City of Riverside`
- City of Orange
- City of Claremont
- County of San Bernardino"
- City of Azusa'
- City of Brea`
- City of Manhattan Beach
P-320
Page 2
Samuel Gennawey
Public Outreach Leader
- City of Chula Vista`
- City of San Buenaventura (Ventura) Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee Facilitation'
- City of Riverbank
- City of Torrance
- City of Hemet
- City of Live Oak
- City ofLong Beach'
- City of Rialto'
- Cily of Colton'
- City of Redwood City
- City of West Hollywood`
- City of Pasadena Land Use and Mobility elements`
- City of Desert Hat Springs
• Organizational Development and Conflict Resolution
- City of San Buenaventura (Ventura) Planning Commission and Staff Retreat'
- City of Rolling Hills Estate Mediation/Public Facilitation Services for the Rolling Hills Covenant Church Expansion
- Calirans Office of Local Programs Managers Meeting Facilitation
- Caltrans Project Development Board and Environmental Program Performance Measure Workshop
- City of Long Beach Town Hall Meeting Facilitation
- County of Los Angeles Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan
- Orange County Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) Service Review Implementation Study
- Office of Gloria Molina, First District Supervisor, Los Angeles County Field Staff Strategic Planning Workshop'
• Specific Plans and Redevelopment Projects
- City of Glendale-Design Services for East Garfield Neighborhood
- City of Huntington Beach -Southeast Coast Area Redevelopment Plan
- City of Pasadena -Central District Specific Plan
- City of Reno -10 North Virginia Street (Mapes Hotel) Community Workshops
- City o1 Chula Vista - Midbayfront Community Meeting Facilitation'
- UNOCAL Tank Farm Sile Study -San Luis Obispo
- City of Azusa -Redevelopment Plan Amendment Community Meeting Facilitation"
- Milwaukee Regional Medical Center Land Use Plan
- Diocese of Gary Indiana Merrillville Site Suitability Study'
- City of Irvine -Northern Sphere Open Space Vision'
- City of Reno-Redevelopment Agency Downtown CammunityVisioning Workshops
- City of Brea- Downtown Redevelopment Agency Workshops"
- City of Pomona -Fox Theater Design Charrette'
- Cily of Santa Monica-Auto Dealership Study"
- City of Henderson -Downtown Investment Strategy Community Workshop Facilitation`
- Pasadena Unified School District Service Yard Community Meetings`
- City of LaCanada Flinlridge -Downtown Village Area Specific Plan"
- City of West Hollywood -City Council Economic Development Study
- City of Burbank-View Protection and Preservations Issues Community Input and Consensus Study'
- Community Development Commission of the County of Los Angeles West Altadena Community Redevelopment Project`
- City of Pasadena -Lower Hastings Ranch Neighborhood Traffic Study and Community Charrette"
- City of Yucaipa I-10 Freeway Corridor Specific Plan and EIR"
- City of Temple City Piazza Las Tunas Mixed Use Development
- City of Diamond Bar Crestline Drive/Diamond Canyon Area Annexation`
- City of Monrovia Land Use and Circulation Elements and Program EIR'
- City of Brea La Floresta Specific Plan development"
P-321
Page 3
Samuel Gennawey
Public Outreach Leader
- City of Alhambra 5'"and Main Specific Plan`
- Harper Lake Specific Plan'
- City of Alhambra Alhambra Place Specific Plan"
- Northwest Pasadena- Lincoln Corridor Revitalization Study'
- City of Monrovia Station Square Specific Plan'
- City of Monrovia Gold Line M&0 Railyard'
- City of Los Angeles/HACLA Jordan Downs SCAG Compass Blueprint grant
• Transportation
- Omnitrans San Bernardino E Street Rapid Transit Co«idor Project (SBX)'
- MTA/Gateway Cities Council of Governments Issues and Realignment Facilitation for the I-710 Corridor
- Port of Los Angeles Transportation Enhancement Planning and Design Program'
- City of Reno-ReTrac Railroad Corridor Project
- Las Angeles to Pasadena Blue Line Construction Authority Public Outreach and Community Participation Program
- City of Placentia Environmental Documentation and Clearance Orange County Gateway (OnTrac) Railroad Corridor Project'
- MTA Long Range Transportation Plan Update
- Caltrans District 4 California Transportation Plan (CTP) Workshops
- Santa Cruz Metropolitan Transit District Paratransit Study
- Caltrans Districl7 On-call Services
- Caltrans Interstate 5 Corridor Improvement Project'
- Ventura County Transportation Commission US 101 Freeway Feasibility Study'
- City of Burbank- Airport Plan Evaluation and Review Committee (PERC) Facilitation'
- Riverside County Transportation Commission Cajalco-Ramona Corridor Study aka Mid-County Parkway
- Riverside County Transportation Commission Public Relations Support and Public Involvement Activities for the
Riverside/Orange County Corridor Major Investment Study (SR91)
- Development Assessment Study for the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Corridor
- Caltrans Interstate 405 High Occupancy Vehicle Lane Project
• Zoning and Housing
- City of Westminster Zoning Code Update
- City of Santa Ana Housing Element
Hogle-Ireland, Inc. Pasadena CA (2007 -July 2010)
Project Manager/Senior Associate
• Managed two General Plans projects and their CEQA components valued at more than $1.1 million each. Led the multi-
disciplinary, multi-firm team that utilized an innovative approach integrating Community Collaboration, Sustainability,
and Community Health.
• Responsible for the on time delivery of a 65-acre Specific Plan and EIR that combines amixed-use Transit Oriented
Development (TOD), a Light Rail Maintenance and Operations yard, and connectivity to the existing Central Business
District. The project has wan multiple planning awards.
Implemented start-up of the Hogle Ireland Pasadena office including location identification, staff recruitment, and
business development. The office pedormance is consistently the highest per capita of the firm's three offices.
P-322
Page 4
Samuel Gennawey
Public Outreach Leader
AECOM (EDAW, P&D Consulting, CBA) Pasadena CA (2004 - 2007)
Project ManagerNrbanist
• Leda 100-member General Plan Community Advisory Committee, developing an innovative strategy that maximized
community collaboration. The Plan was one of the first two in California to be based on Sustainability as a care value.
The level of community participation was cited as the project wan multiple American Planning Association awards.
• Led the team and facilitated the community task force discussion fora 1200-acre Specific Plan. The project
demonstrated an innovative use of sophisticated land use planning on a very complex site straddling a major freeway.
Preservation of views, the use of natural systems plus a very high level of design were incorporated into the Plan.
• Facilitated the community collaboration and outreach programs far hvo General Plan updates in rural communities. The
projects featured nontraditional ways to attract communities who generally do not participate in civic matters.
MIG. Pasadena CA (2000 - 2004)
Project Manager
• Directed the General Plan community collaboration program for a county with a land area of 20,000-square miles.
Produced the first comprehensive Sustainable Vision in the County's 150-year history and was unanimously adopted by
the Board of Supervisors. This Statement became the foundation to the Plan.
• Produced an award winning Vision and community collaboration program for a leading Inland Empire city. The Ciry was so
satisfied my firm was retained to complete the multi-million dollar General Plan Update, Zoning Code, and Development Code.
This project was rewarded an American Planning Award in part due to the inclusive Outreach program based on the Vision.
• Facilitated and developed the communications strategy for a City task force called the Airport Plan Evaluation and Review
Committee dealing with growth issues between a community and major sculhland transportation facility. The project led
to a mutually beneficial agreement between the City and the Airport Authority.
OWP&P Architects Chicago IL (1998 - 2000)
Associate Planner
• Facilitated the entitlement process for the expansion of an internationally prominent retailer.
• Conducted a site suitability study for a properly owned by a large religious institution.
• Conducted numerous site feasibility studies and analysis of land code requirements and process.
Recording and Broadcasting Industry Related Experience (1979-1997)
• Held various roles within the recording and broadcast industries including managing a music label and marketing a high
profile commercial radio station.
Invited lecturer and seminar participant
• Speaker -2011 League of Cities Planners Institute and Mini Expo
How to Read an EIR Over the Weekend
• Contributor 2010 The Unofficial Guide: The Color Companion to Walt Oisney World -thirteen Disney Design by Sam
Gennawey sidebar essays
Lecturer 2010 Western Illinois University, Orlando Florida
Communication Around the "World"
P-323
Page 5
Samuel Gennawey
Public Outreach Leader
• Speaker 2006 National American Planning Association, San Antonio
Debunking Downtown's 12 Urban Myths
• Speaker - 2006 California American Planning Association, Garden Grove
Decoding the Transect and Form-Based Codes: Finding a Better Way
• Speaker - 2005 California American Planning Association, Yosemite
Finding the Needle in the Housing Haystack: A62348 and the New Reality
Debunking Downtown's 12 Urban Myths
• Speaker - 2004 California American Planning Association, Palm Springs
Community Involvement: One City, Three Approaches
• Speaker - 2003 National American Planning Association, Denver
High-Touch/High-Tech Citizen Outreach
• Speaker - 2001 California American Planning Association, Sacramento
From High-Touch to High-Tech and Back Again: Civic Engagement at the Crossroads
Professional Affiliations
Urban land Institute, Co-Chair TOD Committee and Host of the 2011 TOD Summit
Former Board Member, Pasadena Center Operating Committee
American Planning Association
P-324
Page 6
P-325
Christopher J. Jordan, AICP
Senior Planner
Education
B.S., City and Regional Planning, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Experience and Current Responsibilities
Mr. Jordan works out of the Rancho Cordova office of PMC on both current and advance planning projects. He works on a wide
variety of projects including general plans, zoning codes, land use modeling, and agency staffing. He has experience in both
development and implementation of policies and regulations, making him a valuable member of the PMC team.
Relevant Project Experience
^ City of lone, Planning Director - As a contract planner, Mr. Jordan serves as planning director for the City of lone in
Amador Count, managing all aspects of city planning functions including review and processing of development plans,
subdivisions, and environmental assessment; coordination with other City departments and regional planning agencies;
preparation and processing of amendments to the municipal code; and presentation of projects to the Planning
Commission and City Council. He also oversees the development and implementation of several planned developments.
Some of the specific projects he has is working on or has completed as part of his duties include:
o Oversight of the development of the City's new General Plan;
o A comprehensive update to the City's Zoning Code, including the development of several new zoning districts
and the rezoning of over 200 parcels for consistency with the new General Plan;
o A comprehensive update to the City's Land Division (Subdivision) Code;
o Processing of a Sphere of Influence amendment to reflect the growth plan in the updated General Plan,
including development of a memorandum of understanding with the County of Amador to guide development
in the Sphere until annexation occurs;
o Processing of an annexation to include the City's wastewater treatment plant within the City prior fo
construction of a new facility, including negotiating the tax exchange agreement with the County of Amador;
o Coordination with regional and partner agencies including Amador County, the Amador County Transportation
Commission, and Caltrans;
o Oversight of the West lone Roadway Improvement Strategy (WIRIS), a plan calling for the realignment of State
Route 104 around the west side of the City and associated local roadway improvements to facilitate improved
circulation in the City; and
o Oversight of updates to the Ciry's Development Impact Fee Program and Cost of Services fee structure. The DIFP
was updated to include capital projects that support implementation of the General Plan and divide costs across all
anticipated development under the Plan. The Cost of Services update included a compete update to the Building
Permit fees to move away from a "valuation-based" fee structure and to a "direct costs" program.
^ City of Lemoore, Comprehensive Zoning and Development Code Update -Project manager for the update fo the City's
Zoning and other development regulations, including the subdivision ordinance, floodplain management ordinance, and
tree preservation and protection program. The new Zoning Code includes aform-based component for the Downtown
and mixed use opportunity sites around the City that promotes pedestrian oriented development in keeping with the
historic nature of the community.
PMG~
Christopher J. Jordan
Senior Planner
• City o} Elk Grove, 2010 Focused Zoning Code Update -Managed a focused update to the City's Zoning Code. The update
addressed a number of critical issues that the City had been facing in recent years, including revisions to the permit
process far Design Review, revisions to the development standard for accessory structures, fences, wireless facilities,
and signs, and adding a new reasonable accommodations permit to the code consistent with direction in the City's
Housing Element and State and Federal law.
• City of Elk Grove, Tree Ordinance Update - Management of the update to the City's tree preservation and protection ordinance.
The process includes public workshops, stakeholder working group meetings, Planning Commission study sessions, and other
outreach efforts to gather community feedback and suggestion for what should go into the updated regulations.
• City of Elk Grove, Contract Staff Services - Mr. Jordan has provided numerous services to the City of Elk Grove over the
past five years, both in the realms of current planning and special projects. Same of his specific duties have included:
o Support for implementation of the City's new Zoning Code, including the creation of new handouts and forms
for the Sign Permit process;
o Processing development applications, including residential and non-residential design reviews, tentative
subdivision maps and tentative parcel maps, and rezones;
o Preparation of initial studies and mitigated negative declarations as part of development application
processing; and
o Support services for the City's pending Sphere of Influence Amendment
• City of Hollville, DowntownCode - Developed a form-based zoning code for the City of Holtville. The project included
the establishment of a new form-based zoning district covering both downtown and the larger central business district.
For this project, Mr. Jordan served as the project manager
• City of Rancho Cordova, Comprehensive Zoning Cade Update -Assisted with the development of the first Comprehensive
Zoning Code for the City of Rancho Cordova. The Code includes numerous form-based elements that emphasize the form of
the building and its relationship to the public realm while still providing the City with valuable use restrictions.
• Town of Atherton, Zoning Code Update - Mr. Jordan served as the project manager for the comprehensive update to the
Town's Zoning Code. The project included significant reorganization, new administration procedures, new building
height and measurement standards, and clarification of provisions throughout with liberal use of graphics and
illustrations. The project also included an extensive public outreach campaign to gain input from residents and other
stakeholders regarding key proposed changes in advance of public hearings.
• City of Hemet, Downtown Sign Overlay District - Developed a special overlay zoning district far the downtown area that
provides unique regulations for signage. The provisions provide solutions to unique problems in the downtown, such as
the location of buildings along a state highway, allowed sign types that fit with the historical character of the downtown,
and maintenance and removal of existing signage that preserved the integrity of the buildings
• City ci Winters, DowntownCode - Developed a form-based zoning code for the City of Winters. The project included the
establishment of two new form-based zoning districts covering both the historic downtown and an adjacent
redevelopment area. For this project, Mr. Jordan served as the project manager.
• City of Colton, Sign Ordinance Update -Revised the City's existing Sign Ordinance to include design guidelines and
standardized time, place, and manner restrictions to help clarify the City's desires and provide consistent, uniform
provisions for all new signs in the City.
• City of South Lake Tahoe, General Plan Update - Preparation of the Community Design Element of the City of South Lake
Tahoe General Plan and creation of citywide design guidelines.
P-326
Page 2
Christopher J. Jordan
Senior Planner
• General Plan Annual Report, City of Rancho Cordova -Developed the first General Plan Annual Report for the City of
Rancho Cordova, as required by Government Code section 65400, analyzing the City's progress towards meeting the
goals and objectives of the General Plan and implementation of its share of the Regional Housing Needs Plan.
• City of Sierra Madre, Measure VAnalysis -Conducted the required Election Code section 9212 analysis and potential
impacts of the proposed Measure V. The ballot measure was proposed to restrict development in the downtown central
core area to a maximum of two stories or thirty feet and a maximum of thirteen dwelling units per acre.
• 2007 I-PLACE'S Land Use Model and Projections, City of Rancho Cordova -Developed the 2007 I-PLACE'S land use
model and growth projections for the City of Rancho Cordova. The model is the basis for all work during the 2007
calendar year requiring development data and growth projections, including the City's new Capital Improvement Plan, the
pending 2007-2013 Regional Housing Needs Allocation, and project-level CEDA review.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Mixed Use Zoning Provisions -Developed new mixed-use zoning provisions that implement the
vision of the City's new General Plan for mixed-use development. The provisions emphasize development oriented to the
pedestrian and utilize a more consolidated use listing than other districts in the Cily. Anew "integrated development"
permitting process that allows for multiple properties with unique zoning districts to be designed and developed as an
integrated unit were also included.
• Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo -Guest lecturer to the fourth-year undergraduate planning lab, covering several topics in advanced
planning, including General Plans, Community Plans, Specific Plans, Zoning Codes, and land use authority and jurisdictions.
• I-PLACE'S/Blueprint User Manual, California Energy Commission -Project Manager. Developed a user manual for
metropolitan planning organizations and local jurisdictions that describes the process for developing a regional plan
similar to the Blueprint developed by the Sacramento Area Council of Governments for the Sacramento region. The
planning process utilizes the i-Place3s computer model for land planning and scenario development Through conscience
building. The project also involved development of the first comprehensive user manual for the I-Place3s software.
• Amador County, Sign Ordinance Update -Worked with the County to incorporate special provisions for integrated
developments in their existing sign ordinance. The provisions were performance based, designed to reflect the unique
nature of the development and its integration with the surrounding built and physical context.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Citywide Design Guidelines-Assisted with the development of the City's first set of Design Guidelines.
The provisions cover all types of development, including residential subdivisions, master plans, multi-family projects, and all
non-residential development. They stress mixed-use and pedestrian friendly development with a unique sense of place.
• City of Elk Grove, Comprehensive Zoning Code Update -Assisted with the development of the first Comprehensive
Zoning Code far the incorporated City of Elk Grove to implement the newly adopted General Plan and establish innovative
and flexible zoning provisions.
• City of Rancho Cordova, General Plan -Assisted with the research and drafting of the first General Plan for the newly
incorporated City of Rancho Cordova, including public outreach surveys, case study research, and land use analysis, and
the inclusion of I-PLACE'S in the development process.
• San Miguel 2025 Community Plan -Project manager. Led the team in researching the community's needs, opportunities,
and constraints, the public outreach efforts, and designing policy recommendations for the community of San Miguel and
the County of San Luis Obispo. The Plan was the recipient of both the Central Coast Section and California Chapter of the
American Planning Association Award /or Leadership and Service by an Academic Institution in 2004. It also received the
2005 American Institute of Certified Planners award for Outstanding Student Project -Applying the Planning Process.
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
American Institute of Certified Planners
P-327
Page 3
P-328
Patrick Angell
Principal/Directorfnr Environmental Analysis
Education
B.A., Environmental Science with a government emphasis, California State University, Sacramento, CA
Land Use and Environmental Planning Certificate Program, UC Davis Extension, CA
Experience and Current Responsibilities
Mr. Angell is a Principal at PMC and oversees the company's Environmental Services Group. He also serves as a project director
and manager and technical analyst for a variety of projects. He specializes in environmental and urban land use planning, and has
pedormed tasks for projects such as water and wastewater facilities, energy facilities, flood control projects, residential
subdivisions, mixed-use urban developments, general plans, and redevelopment plans. Mr. Angell's experience includes
establishing environmental review divisions for cities, coordination and facilitation of large-scale private and public projects,
preparing urban land use and growth analysis, recreation and visual resource studies, public services assessment, transportation
and circulation studies, and cultural resource analysis. He has also been involved in the preparation of several CEDA and NEPA
documents and technical studies and has over 18 years of environmental documentation preparation experience.
Relevant Project Experience
Departrnent and Project Management Projects
• City of Elk Grove, Environmental Services Division Set-Up, Acting Environmental Coordinator -PMC is currently
providing environmental management and permitting services to the Cily of Elk Grove's roadway improvement projects.
This includes coordination with the City of Elk Grove Public Works Department staff, agency meetings with California
Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Regional Water Cuality Control Board and U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers. Activities include preparation of environmental documents, peer review of technical studies, public
outreach and mitigation monitoring (including field work). Mr. Angell established the operations of this division under
the Planning Department of the City and was the first acting Environmental Coordinator.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Frnironmental Services Division Set-Up, Acting Frnironmental Division Manager -PMC is currently
providing environmental management and permitting services to the City of Rancho Cordova for both public and private projects.
This includes coordination with the Puhlic Works Department staff, agency meetings with California Deparbment of fish and
Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Regional Water Quality Conirol Board and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Activities
include preparation of environmental documents, peer review of technical studies, public outreach and mitigation monitoring
(including field work). Mr. Angell established the operations of this division under the Planning Department of the City.
• City of Palm Springs, Fmironmerdal Services Division Contract Staff, Director -PMC provided environmental management
and permitting services to the City for both public and private projects. This included coordination with the Public Works
Department staff, meetings with other public agencies (e.g., California Department of Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service). Activities include preparation of environmental documents, peer review of technical studies, and public outreach.
General Plan Projects
• City of Elk Grove, City of Elk Grove General Plan EIR, Projeq Manager -The City of Elk Grove incorporated in July 2000
and is in the process of considering a new General Plan for the City. Key environmental issues associated with the
General Plan include public services (water supply, wastewater service, recreation and parks), open space, agricultural
resources, traffic, transit, jobs/housing balance and biological resources.
PMC®
.~.
Patrick Angell
PrincipaWirectortor Environmental Analysis
• Napa Courtly, Napa County General Plan Update EIR, Project Mareg~ -Napa County initiated a comprehensive update of it
General Plan (1983) that involved the consideration of five different land use and growth alternatives. Key environmental issues
associated with the General Plan Update include public services (water supply, wastewater service, recreation and parks), open
space, agricultural resources, traffic, transit, jobs/housing balance, biological resources, climate change and water quality.
• Town of Corte Madera, General Plan Update EIR, Project Manager -The Town of Corte Madera prepared a General Plan
Update that considers additional infill and revitalization opportunities in the Town, which is near buildout. Key
environmental issues include flooding and sea level rise, housing, water supply, traffic, and growth effects.
• City of Rancho Cordova, City of Rancho Cordova General Plan EIR, Project Manager -EIR Project Manager for the
preparation of the city's first General Plan, including smart growth principles, detailed market analysis, land use
modeling, and business pro forma. SACOG Regional Excellence Award and CCAPA Award. Environmental issues
included traffic impacts, growth projections, biological resource impacts to vernal pools and wetlands, water supply,
visual resource impacts and public service provision.
• City of Madera City of Madera General Plan Update F1R, Project Manager -The City of Elk Madera General Plan Update
proposes smart growth, mixed uses, and infill development, while providing for new greenfield development. Key environmental
issues associated with the General Plan include public services (water supply, wastewater service, recreation and parks), climate
change, open space, agricultural resources, traffic, transit, jobsmcusing balance and biological resources.
City of South Lake Tahoe, City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan EIR, Project Manager -PMC is the EIR consultant to the
Mintier & Associates General Plan Update Team for the City of South Lake Tahoe. The intent of the General Plan Update
to reflect current conditions in the Cily as well as coordinate with regional planning activities being undertaken by the
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency.
• City of Chico, City of Chico General Plan Update OR, Project Director-The City proposed an comprehensive update of its General
Plan. The proposed General Plan considered a balance of smart growUVinfill with new grovrth. Environmental issues included traffic
impacts, growth projections, biological resource impacts, water supply, visual resource impacts and public service provision.
Specific Plan and Long-Range Projects
• City of Laguna Beach, Aliso Creek Redevelopment Project EIR, Project Director -PMC is preparing an EIR for the
proposed Aliso Creek Redevelopment Project for the City of Laguna Beach. The project consists of a mixed use resort
development project in the City on an existing goff course resort community. Key environmental issues include flooding,
traffic, visual resources, cultural resources, public services, and open space conversion.
City of Sacramento, Panhandle PUD and Annetation EIR, Project Manager -PMC prepared EIR for the proposed
Panhandle PUD and Annexation for the Ciry of Sacramento. The project consists of a mixed use development project in
the North Nalomas Community Plan area of the City. Key environmental issues include flooding associated with the flood
zone redesignation of the Natomas Basin and anticipated improvements to reovle this issue, traffic, cultural resources,
public services, and open space conversion.
City of Elk Grove, Laguna Ridge Specific Plan EIR, Project Manager -The City of Elk Grove incorporated in July 2000 and
developed its first Specific Plan as the City for approximately 7,800 residential units, commercial uses, office and public
uses. Key environmental issues associated with the project include public services (water supply, wastewater service,
recreation and parks), open space, agricultural resources, traffic, transit, jobs/housing balance and biological resources.
• City of Rancho Cordova, Rio del Oro Specific Plan EIS/EIR, Project Manager on Behalf of the Ciry -The Rio del Ora
Specific Plan consists of a mixed-use development project on 3,800 acres located on property previously utilized for
testing of rocket engines. The project would require an Individual Permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Acl for
wetland fill. The CEQA lead agency is the City of Ranch Cordova, while the NEPA lead agency is the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers. Key environmental issues include biological resources, water supply, traffic, hazards and growth effects. The
EIS/EIR was prepared by another consultant that was managed by Mr. Angell.
P-329
Page 2
P-330
Patrick Angell
PrincipaWiredorfor Environmental Analysis
• Calaveras County, Oak Canyon Ranch Spec'rfic Plan EIR, Projed Manager -PMC was retained to prepare the EIR for the
Oak Canyon Specific Plan, which proposes the development of a resort center, two 18-hole golf courses and 2,275
residential units. The project is a refinement of a previously approved General Plan Amendment that established the
range of development allowed at the site. Key issues include biological resources (wetland and waterway impacts);
traffic; consistency with previous approvals; public service impacts; and water quality and drainage issues.
• Nevada County, Wolf Creek Ranch Estates EIR, Projed Manager -The Wolf Creek Ranch Estates project consists of a
planned development in the western portion of Nevada County that would allow for the development of 230 residential
units, two park sites, an equestrian center and establishment of open space areas. The project would he served by a
public water system and a community septic system onsite. Key environmental issues include consistency with the
Nevada County General Plan, traffic, visual resources, water quality issues associated with the proposed community
septic system, fire hazard and emergency access and biological resources.
• Nevada County, Higgins Center EIR, Projed Manager -The Higgins Center project consists of a proposed commercial
center in the Higgins Corner/Lake of the Pines area in the western portion of Nevada County. The project would be
served by a public water system and a community septic system offsite. Key environmental issues include consistency
with the Nevada County General Plan, traffic, visual resources, water quality issues associated with the proposed
community septic system, and biological resources.
• Cal EPA Building EIR -City of Sacramento, Projed Manager -Prior to joining PMC, Mr. Angell was Environmental
Science Associate's Project Manager for the Cal EPA Building EIR. This project consisted of the demolition of an existing
parking garage and the development of new office building adjacent to City of Sacramento City Hall. Key environmental
issues included traffic, noise, wind tunnel effects, urban design, shadow and public service provision.
• Esquire Building EIR-Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, Task Leader- Prior to joining PMC, Mr. Angell
prepared key sections of this EIR. This project consisted of the redevelopment of a series of parcels at the location of the
Esquire theatre along K Street in the City of Sacramento. Key environmental issues included traffic, historic structures,
urban design, wind tunnel effects and public service provision.
• Placer County, Mortis Valley Community Plan Update Background Report and EIR, Projed Manager -The Martin Valley
Community Plan Update consists of the revision of the 1975 Mortis Valley General Plan for the Placer County portion of
the Valley (approximately 25,000 acres). The primary purpose of the update is to bring it up to date with current land use
and environmental conditions in the region. PMC completed the Background Report and Draff EIR. The proposed
Community Plan and Draft EIR are intended to provide development environmental standards for future projects in the
Plan area in order to address key environmental issues include affordable/employee housing, traffic, air quality, noise,
water quality, groundwater resources and wastewater service capacity.
• Placer County, Mortis Valley Prajeds, Projed Diredor -PMC was retained to assist Placer County in the preparation of the
Mortis Valley Community Plan Update, as well as the preparation of the EIR for the Community Plan Update. In addition, PMC
has been retained by the County to prepare project EIRs for three development projects in the Madis Valley area. These projects
include the Englewood project (residential, golf course and commercial development project), Village-al-Northstar (expansion of
the existing village center al the Northsfar-at-Tahoe resort community) and the Hopkins Ranch project (residential and golf
course development project). Mr. Angell currently oversees the preparation of all documents associated with Mortis Valley.
Placer County, Englewood at Tahoe Projed EIR, Projed Manager -PMC has been retained to prepare and EIR for the
Englewood Resort project. Based on the Development Plan submitted by the project applicant to the County, The 475-acre
Englewood project consists of 184.6 acres of residential development (470 dwelling units) consisting of single-family and
single-family townhomes; 276.8 acres of open space that consists of 151.4 acres of open space, 6.7 acres of park, 11.5
acres for the clubhouse site (25,000 square feet associated with the clubhouse), 106 acres of golf course (18 holes), and
1.2 acres of golf course maintenance facilities (7,000 square feet); and 40 affordable housing units. The proposed project
includes development of internal roadways, public and private trails, a single gated entrance, emergency access points,
water supply improvements, connection to the regional sewer system, and improved storm drainage facilities. Key issues
include water quality, groundwater supply issues, deer migration issues, affordable housing impacts and traffic impacts.
Page 3
Patrick Angell
PrincipaVDireclorTor Environmental Analysis
• Placer County, Hopkins Ranch Project EIR, Project Manager -PMC was retained to prepare an EIR for the proposed
development of 65 residential units and an 18-hole golf course facility on 285 acres in the Mortis Valley area of Placer
County. Key issues include visual impacts to Marlis Valley; airport safety; water quality and groundwater supply issues;
deer migration issues; affordable housing impacts and traffic impacts.
Placer County, Sunset Industrial Area Plan EIR, Project Manager -The Sunset Industrial Area Plan identifies potential
improvements to existing conditions and constraints for the purpose of promoting industrial and commercial
development in the 9,000-acre area plan. The project also contrihuted to the County's development of a habitat
conservation plan. Mr. Angell was the consultant managing this project.
City of Tracy, Presidio Planned Unit Development and Community Park Project EIR, Assistant Project Manager -PMC
prepared aproject-level EIR for the City of Tracy for the Presidia Planned Unit Development and Community Park. The
project consisted of 550 single-family residential dwelling units and a 27-acre community park consisting of four lighted
softball fields, four lighted soccer fields, concession facility, and storage. The environmental analysis included
consideration of the adequacy of on-site parking facilities al the community park to handle large sporting events, noise
impacts to adjoining residential areas from park activities, traffic impacts from residential uses and sporting events, and
nighttime lighting impacts from sports park facilities. Other key issues included public services and utilities and the
joint-use of a portion of the community park for storm drainage retention.
• City of Tracy, Tracy Hills Technology Park EIR, Project Manage-This project involved modifications to the Tracy Hills Specific
Plan Land Use Map to allow a mix of office, research/development and multi-family land uses within the Plan area east of
Interstate 580. Key environmental issues involved water supply, wastewater capacity, hazardous materials, traffic and noise.
Nevada County, Dark Horse Golf Course and Residential Community EIR, Project Manager -Prior to PMC, Mr. Angell
was the Project Manager for the Dark Horse Golf Course and Residential Community project. The Dark Horse Golf Course
and Residential Community project consists of a planned residential development project of up to 320 residential lots,
18-hole golf course and permanent open space. The project would be served by a public water system and a community
septic system onsite. Key environmental issues include consistency with the Nevada County General Plan, tragic, visual
resources, water quality issues associated with the proposed community septic system, Lire hazard and emergency
access and biological resources.
• EI Dorado County, The Promontory Spec'rfic Plan EIR, Project Manager - Prior to joining PMC, Mr. Angell was the project
manager for The Promontory Specific Plan EIR in the EI Dorado Hills community. Key issues included traffic, biological
resources, public services and visual resources.
• Madera County, Gateway Village Project EIR, Assistant Project Manager - Prior to joining PMC, Mr. Angell was the
assistant project manager for The Gateway Village Project consists of a planned development in the southeastern portion
of Madera County near the San Joaquin River. Key environmental issues included loss of agricultural resources, traffic,
water supply and public services.
Public School Projects
• Saratoga Unified School District, Argonuat Elementary School Er~ansion Mitigated Negative Declaration, Project
Manager -PMC prepared the initial study and mitigated negative declaration for the planned expansion of Argonaut
Elementary School. With the successful passage of Ballot Measure D in June of 1997, the Saratoga Union School District
received $40 million in General Obligation Bond proceeds to modernize and expand their four school sites to support the
educational program, upgrade the facilities, and accommodate the anticipated growth over the next ten years. Key issues
involved traffic and traffic safety, visual impacts and tree removal.
• Saratoga Un'rfied School Dishict, Foothill Elementary School E~ansion EIR, Project Manager -Far the expansion of the
Foothill Elementary School, PMC acted in an advisory role, guiding the District Through the CEOA process, and prepared
an EIR that addressed issues such as retaining scenic viewsheds, increased noise, Traffic circulation, and pedestrian
safety. The Foothill Elementary School Expansion was pan of the same modernization and expansion process as that
under which the Argonaut School Expansion was being conducted.
P-337
Page 4
P-332
Patridr Angell
PrincipaVDirectorlar Environmental Analysis
• City of Tracy/Tracy Un~ed School District, Tracy Learning Center Elfi, Senior Staff - PMC is preparing an EIR for TUSD for a
new K-12 campus on a 62-acre project site. The Tracy Learning Center will be developed as a magnet school, ultimately
housing over 3,500 students. The campus will include a community library and senior center in recognition of a project
partnership with the City of Tracy. Key environmental issues include land use, public services, and provision of infrastructure.
Roadway Improvement Projects
• City of Elk Grove, State Route 99/Grant Line Road Interchange ReconsWction Project EIR, Project Manager on Behalf of
the City- The City of Elk Grove is in the process of expanding the existing Slate Route 99/Grant Line Road Interchange in
order to accommodate existing and future local and regional traffic. Work on this project involved management of the EIR
preparation, coordination with Caltrans and construction planning/monitoring. The EIR was prepared by another
consultant that was managed by Mr. Angell.
• EI Dorado Coumy, Green Valley Road Widening Project Environmental Services, Project Manager -This project consists of the
planned widening and associated improvement of Green Valley Road from the City of Folsom east to Francisco Drive in the EI
Dorado Hills community. Work conducted on Nis project included the preparation of two Mitigated Negative Declarations
associated wiN roadway improvements, wetland fill permitting, preconstruclion biologist resource surveys, California red-legged
frog surveys, and technical analyses associated wiN constmclion and operational noise impacts and nighttime constmction lighting.
• EI Dorado County, Latrobe Road Realignment, Widening and Bridge Project Environmental Services, Project Manager -
EI Dorado County planned improvements to Latrobe Road and White Rack Road consisted of modifications to the
roadway alignment, widening to four lanes and bridge crossing improvements associated with Carson Creek. Work on
this project consisted of the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and preconstruction biological surveys.
• EI Dorado County, White Rodc Road East Improvement Project Project Director -This project consisted of the
consideration of interim and ultimate improvements to White Rock Road east of Latrobe Road as well as the extension of
the roadway north to Silva Valley Parkway. Work on this project consisted of the preparation of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, California red-legged frog surveys, and wetland fill permitting.
• EI Dorado County, Cameron Park Ddve/Mira Loma Drive and Meder Road Improvements, Project Manager -This project
consisted of improvements to the existing Cameron Park Drive/Mira Loma and Meder Road intersections in order to
improve operation and safety. Environmental review on this project consisted of the preparation of initial studies in
support of a categorical exemption.
• EI Dorado County, Bridgeport School Road Negative Declaration/Categodcal Exclusion, Project Manager -This project
consisted of the replacement of a bridge structure and roadway realignment that involved the use of federal funds. Key
issues on the project consisted of biological resources (California red-legged trog), cultural resources and tree removal.
• Johnsville/Jamison Creek Bridge Replacement Project, Assistant Project Manager-The proposed project consists of the
demolition and replacement of an existing single-lane bridge in the Plumas -Eureka State Park in Plumas County.
Environmental documentation performed on the project includes a Natural Environmental Study, 4f Evaluation, Negative
Declaration, and cultural resources studies.
• City of Bakersfield, Slate Route 178/Moming Drive Interchange Project, Environmental Project Manager -The State
Route 178/Morning Drive Interchange Project consists of improving the existing intersection to an interchange. The
project is needed to improve operation of the intersection and safety. The analysis included preparation of several
technical studies for traffic, air quality, noise, biological resources, cultural resources, community impacts as well as the
preparation of an EIWEA for CEQA/NEPA compliance.
• City of Bakersfield, State Route 178 and Fairfax Road Interchange Project, Project Manager -The State Route 178 and
Faidax Road Interchange Project consists of improving the existing intersection to an interchange. The project is needed
to improve operation of the intersection and safety. The analysis included an evaluation of air quality, noise, and
biological impacts, as well as consideration of potential contamination issues.
Page 5
Patrick Angell
PrincipaWirectorfor Environmental Analysis
• Solano County, Grizrly Island Road Bridge Replacement Project, Assistant Project Manager -Assisted in the preparation
of Natural Environmental Study, 4f Evaluation, and cultural resources studies required under NEPA, the Federal
Endangered Species Act, Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, and standards of the California
Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration.
Water and Wastewater Improvement Projects
• City of Roseville, Roseville Regional Wastewater Treatment Service Area Master Plan EIR, Task Leader -The Master Plan
consists of improvements and expansions of the existing regional wastewater system to service anticipated growth in the
City of Roseville and in the surrounding regional though the year 2015. Responsible for analyses of land use and growth
inducement sections of the EIR.
• City of Tracy, Tracy Hills Interim Wastewater Reclamation Facility, Permanent Wastewater Reclamation Facility and Storm
Drainage Improvements EIR, Project Manager -PMC prepared an EIR for this project That involved specific details
regarding planned wastewater and storm drainage improvements for the Tracy Hills Specific Plan area. Key issues
included water quality, groundwater contamination, biological resource issues and hazards.
• City of Tracy, John Jones Water Treatment Plant Expansion EIR, Project Manager -PMC completed the Jahn Janes
Water Treatment Plant Expansion EIR, which involves the planned expansion of the City's water treatment plant to
accommodate planned growth in the City. Key environmental issues included drinking water quality (use of California
Aqueduct versus the Delta-Mendota Canal), biological resources, roadway impacts, air quality and hazards.
• City of Tracy, Tracy Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion EIR, Project Manager -PMC was retained to prepare this EIR
that involves the expansion of the Cily of Tracy Wastewater Treatment Plant to 16 million gallons per day capacity in order
to accommodate planned growth. Key issues includes surface water quality in Old River and the Delta, impacts to
fisheries, construction-related impacts and cultural resource issues.
• City of Tracy, Tracy Groundwater Policy Mitigated Negative Declaration, Project Manager -PMC prepared the Mitigated
Negative Declaration far the Tracy Groundwater Management Policy, which allows for increased groundwater production
by the City. Key environmental issues consisted primarily of the groundwater resource and quality issues.
• Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant Master Plan EIR, Task Leader -This project consists of the
improvement and expansion of the Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant to meet changing environmental
regulations and future growth demands of Sacramento County. Responsible for analyses of land use, growth inducement,
and visual resources sections of the EIR.
• Deer Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion EIR, Task Leader for Land Use and Grox9h Analyses -The proposed
wastewater treatment plant expansion would provide increased service to the western portion of EI Dorado County which
is experiencing substantial population growth.
• Spalding Community Services District EIR, Task Leader for the Population and Housing, Land Use, and Growth Analyses
-The proposed project would convert the District's septic systems to a community wastewater conveyance and treatment
system. Indirect effects of growth from project implementation were assessed.
• North Beach Lake/Sacramento Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SRWfP) Levee Improvement Project EIR in
Sacramento County, CA, Task Leader -The proposed levee improvement project would provide 100-year level flood
protection for the southern portion of the City of Sacramento and 400-year level flood protection for the SRWiP. Tasks
include land use, growth inducement, visual resources, and traffic analyses.
• U.S. Bureau of Reclamation American River Water Resource Investigation EIR/EIS, Recreation Task Leader -Recreation
analysis evaluated existing recreation sites and activities along the American River basin and the potential impact of
reduced flows to recreation opportunities.
P-333
Page 6
P-334
for Environmental
• Carmidtael Water District Surface Water Supply Project DR and Perming, Assistard Project Manager-The Surface Water Supply
Project consists of improvements to the District's water diversion and treattnent facilities along the American River Parkway, an
extensively used regional parkway. Responsible for analyses of land use, visual resources, and transportation sections of the EIR and
obtaining permits and approvals from Department of Fish and Game, State Reclamation Board, and Sacramento County. Prepared
and implemented the mitigation monitoring and reporting program far the Surface Water Supply Project.
Energy Projects
• Mountain Yew Power Plant Project Land Use Assessmed, Task Manager -The Mountain View Power Plant project (MVPP)
involves the constmction and operation of an expansion to the existing 132 MW (net) Mountain View Power Plant. The expansion
would add 1,056 MW (net) of natural gas-fired combined cycle power to an enlarged site. A gas pipeline, wastewater line, and
water supply lines will be extended to the site. Responsible for overseeing the preparation of the land use section of the Staff
Assessment for the California Energy Commission, as well as attendance at project workshops and meetings.
• Hanford Energy Park Small Power Plant Exemption Land Use and Agricultural Assessments, Task Manager -The Hanford
Energy Park SPPE involves the of an expansion to the existing power plant as well as electrical distribution lines, switchyard
and a natural gas pipeline extension. Responsible for overseeing the preparation of the land use and agricultural sections of
the SPPE for the California Energy Commission, as well as attendance at project workshops and meetings.
• Nueva Azalea Power Plant Project Land Use Assessment, Task Manager -The Nueva Azalea Project is the proposed
construction and operation of a 575-megawatt (MW) natural gas and steam electrical power plant. Responsible for
overseeing the preparation of the land use section of the Stott Assessment for the California Energy Commission, as well
as attendance at project workshops and meetings.
• Power Plant Siting Assistance-California Energy Commission, Project Director - Under a contract to Aspen
Environmental Group, PMC is providing environmental and land use assessment assistance to the California Energy
Commission (CEC) for the review of power plant applications to the CEC under various application processes. Several of
the application processes are in response to the current energy crisis in the state.
Land Use Planning Experience
• Mariposa County Planning Department, Assistant Planner -Responsible for current planning projects, including land
developments, environmental review in cooperation with the California State Department of Fish and Game.
Responsibilities also included general land use policy, code, and permit review.
• City of Folsom Planning Department, Assistant Planner -Responsible for current planning projects, including land
developments and design review, and long-range planning projects, including the City of Folsom Bikeway Master Plan
and the Humbug-Willow Creek Parkway Master Plan.
Professional Affiliations
American Planning Association
Association of Environmental Professionals
Papers -California Energy Commission -Land Use Issues Associated With Power Plant Facility Siting
- 2005 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Survey of California Cities and Counties
Page 7
P-335
Danielle T. Griffith
Project Manager for Environmental Malysis
Education
Juris Doctor, Western State University College of Law, Fullerton, CA
Master of Arts, Political Science, Specializing Public Policy, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA
Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA
E1~erience and Current Responsibilities
Miss Griffith has over has over ten years of progressively responsible experience in planning, environmental planning and analysis.
She has experience in developing long- and short-term plans for land use, growth and revitalization of urban, suburban, and rural
communities. Additionally, she has written and reviewed a variety of environmental planning documents, including technical
reports. She has worked for hoth public agencies and private companies.
Previous Experience
• City of San Diego, Mitigation Analysis -During her tenure with the City of San Diego, Miss Grigith performed
construction phase mitigation analysis for all permitted projects with a MMRP, including infill development within the
downtown redevelopment area.
• City of Hemet, Stetson Ranch Specific Plan -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of the Stetson Ranch Specific Plan a
master planned community, including up to 733 residential homes. Within the City of Hemet. Residential units, include
garden clusters, auto courts, courtyard clusters and green courts. The development also includes a natural open
space/drainage area, a central 4.9-acre park, and two pocket parks that provide recreational amenities for the community.
• Riverside County, Rio Vista Specfic Plan Amendment No. 1 -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of a Specific Plan
Amendment for amend the Rio Vista Specific Plan which is a mixed use master planned development located in an
unincorporated area of Riverside County. The project consists of the following approximately 324.6 acres of residential
development, within four density ranges, totalling approximately 1,762 residential units, a 17.7-acre school site,
approximately 50.0 acres of neighbourhood park sites, 14.0 acres of landscaping on manufactured slopes and 464.8
acres of open space conservation. The Rio Vista park sites are connected by a recreation paseo system.
• Riverside County, Menifee North Specirfic Plan, Amendment No. 2 -Miss Griffith assisted in the preparation of a Specific
Plan Amendment and Mitigated Negative Declaration with proposed land uses including, residential, commercial,
commercial business park, open space, mixed use and industrial land uses on a 1,604.6 acre site.
• Riverside County, Specific Plan 282S7 -Miss Griffith prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a Substantial
Conformance document in Riverside County to eliminate the designated multi-family planning areas of a Specific Plan,
increase the acreage of the single-family planning areas and reduce the overall dwelling units in the Specific Plan.
• Riverside County, Nuevo Business Park EIR -Miss Griffith prepared the EIR for a Tentative Parcel Map in the County of
Riverside which subdivided a 63.49-acre site into 24 parcels far the future development of uses permitted by Riverside
County for Industrial Park uses.
• Riverside County, Oleander Business Park EIR-Miss Griffith assisted in the preparation of an EIR for a Tentative Parcel
Map which subdivided 68.80 gross acres into 5 parcels ranging in size from 5.71 gross acres to 28.23 gross acres.
• Riverside County, Coachella 273 EIR and Specific Plan -Managed the preparation of a Specific Plan and the EIR in the
Coachella Valley fora 300-acre, master-planned residential and commercial community. Miss Griffith also coordinated
efforts with the planning team to incorporate project design features, development standards, design guidelines, and a
zoning ordinance. This project is currently undergoing review.
PMC~
--~ ,
Danielle T. Griffith
Project Manager for Environmental Analysis
• Riverside County, La Guinta 628 EIR and Specific Plan -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of a Specific Plan and the
EIR for amaster-planned community which consists of 2,525 residential dwelling units on 622.1-acres in Riverside
County. She also coordinated efforts with the planning team to incorporate project design features, development
standards, design guidelines, and a zoning ordinance. This project is currently undergoing review.
• Martinez Canyon, The Falls Specific Plan and EIR -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of a the Specific Plan and EIR
loraled in Martinez Canyon of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The project is comprised of 2,700 acres and includes
residential and an active adult community. This project is currently undergoing review.
City of Moreno Valley, Highland Fairview Corporate Park EIR -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of an EIR far a
Tentative Parcel Map in the City of Moreno Valley. The TPM creates parcels on 158.4-acres for two logistics buildings,
two commercial projects, and future SR-60 right-of-way. The proposed industrial park that would include the Skechers
distribution center incorporated recycled construction materials, photovoltaic panels and meet other "green" building
standards. Built in three phases, it would include the 1.8-million-square- foot Skechers building in the first phase; a
smaller logistics building and retail center in the second phase; and another retail center in the third phase. The project
was approved by the City Council in June 2009.
• County of Amador, Martell Business Park Master Plan Amendment FEIR -Miss Griffith managed the preparation of a FEIR
for an amendment to the Martell Business Park Master Plan and zone change. The amendment and zone changes are
update to the current business park master plan to reflect the actual development that has occurred within the planning
area. This includes a re-designation of 14.67 acres from light commercial to commercial land use. A boundary line
adjustment between the medium manufacturing and light manufacturing land areas adds some permitted uses to the light
manufacturing and medium manufacturing land use areas.
Sonoma Courdy Transportation Authodty, 2009 Comprehensive Transpodaton Plan EIR -Miss Griffith assisted in the
management for the preparation of an EIR far a the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This analysis includes the
assessment of air quality and climate change impacts from the implementation of a transportation system in Sonoma County.
City of Laguna Beach, Aliso Creek Area Specirfic Plan EIR Miss Griffith was the Assistant Project Manager far an EIR for the
development of 325 acres in the southern portion of the City of Laguna Beach, east of South Coast Highway and Aliso Beach
Park, in Orange County. The project will improve the existing golf course, provide visitor-serving amenities, and subdivide an
8.1-acre area for nine lots. The project also consists of the dedication of 250 acres of open space and would complete the
necessary linkage for a mountains to sea trail connection from the existing Aliso and Wood Canyons Wilderness Park to Aliso
Beach Park. The project also proposes a number of methods to achieve bank stability and restore riparian habitat in Aliso
Creek, creating a net increase to jurisdictional wetland and riparian habitat. Issues included alteration of the floodplain,
sensitive habitaVspecies concerns, fire and safety, water quality and hydrology impacts, land use compatibility of proposed
trail with golf course, traffic impacts along South Coast Highway, and strong community opposition
• County of Imperial, McCabe Ranch II Speclfic Plan EIR-Ms. Griffith managed the preparation of a proposed Specific Plan
and Specific Plan EIR that would consist of approximately 468 acres within the Heber Specific Plan Area of Imperial
County. It would be comprised of two communities, a gated community with 426 residential units and private and public
parks/open space, and a conventional residential area with approximately 1,842 residential units, two elementary school
sites, two commercial areas, amulti-purpose community area, and public parks/ open spaces areas.
• Caurdy of hnpedal, Coyote Wells Specific Plan DR Ms. Griffith is managing an EIR for a Specirfic Plan Area that would consist of
twenty-two (22) parcels and ten (10) land use and zoning designations on approxmately 943.75 aaes within the Ocotillo/Nomirage
Community Area Plan in an unincorporated area of Imperial County. It would be comprised of two main components, the open
space/recreational area and the open space/preservation area. Within these major areas are other land uses including open space, .
recreation, education and training, tourism, residential, storage, hoteVresott, and infrastmcture land uses.
• County Of Impedal, 101 Ranch Speclfic Plan EIR Ms. Griffith is managing an EIR for a Specific Plan Area with 73 residential
neighbourhoods or "Planning Areas" located on about 1,331 acres consisting of a total of 6,986 homes on lots ranging from 4,000
to 8,000 square feet; four elementary schools divided evenly on 48 acres; a 20acre junior high school site; 13.8 acres of maed
commerciaVnstilulionaVresidential uses; 245.1 acres of parf~, reaeation centers, paseos, trails, and landscaped open space buffer;
P-336
Page 2
Danielle T. Griffith
Project Manager for Environmental Analysis
97.9 acres of stormwater retention facilities; and 141 acres of major roads. Issues included new utility and service facilities and
service line extensions, air quality, traffic, land use compatibility, conversion of agricultural land, and sensitive species.
• Courdy of Impedal, East Brawley Geothenrral Plant Ms. Griffith is the senior project manager for the preparation of an EIR for Ormat
Energy Converters, an expanded geothermal well field beyond the six exploration wells, and pipelines to carry the geothermal brine
to the power plant. Also to be constructed are pipelines to arty the cooled brine to injection wells, pipelines to distribute
noncondensible gas from production wells to the power plant area and injection wells, an electrial transmission line to interconnect
to the substation at the North Brawley 1 Geothermal Paver Plant, and a water pipeline to bring water from the Imperial Inigation
District anal to the power plant for cooling water.
County Of Imperial, Frurester/WorlhingtoryCooley Roads Environmerrlal Studies Ms. Griffith acted as a project manager where PMC
was retained by the County of Imperial Department of Public Works depanment to assist in the environmental documentation to
complete paving projects for a number of roadway segments within the county. Specifially, the paving projects are identified as
follows: (1) Asphalt concrete paving of Pifzer Road from McCabe Rcad to Correll Road (County Project No. 4827). (2) Installation of
asphalt grindings on various County roads for mitigation of PM10 emissions (County Project No. 4828). Each project received
federal funds and is therefore subject to the requirements of NEPA, which is administered through Caltrans District 11 Loal
Assistance. The scope of work included preparing environmental studies and coordination for ach of the roadway projects,
including: approval from Caltrans for these federally funded projects; address all necessary environmental studies in support of the
County obtaining National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearance; Required studies to be prepared by the consulhant for each
roadway segment would consist of a Natural Environment Study, Minimum Impact (NESMI) Report to be approved by Caltrans;
complete all work in compliance with the provisions of the latest edition of Caltrans' Chapter 6, "Environmental Procedures," within
the Caltrans Loal Assistance Procedures Manual; and coordinate with appliable state and federal regulatory agency staff regarding
necessary permits for project implementation.
• Cily of Wildomar, Planning Stiff Ms. Griffith serves as the senior environmental planner for the newly incorporated City of
Wildomar, in Riverside County. In addition to providing all of the rypial Planning Department services, such as zoning inquiries,
processing use permits, and performing CEQA analyses, PMC and Ms. Griffith has been instmmental in literally creating the City's
environmental planning structure. Ms. Griffith prepares the necessary environmental documentation of behalf of the Ciry including
Initial Study/MND, ND, negative and EIRs for project appliations
City of PlacerrUa, Westgate Sperafic Plan, Multimodal EIR PMC was retained to prepare and process a Specific Plan, related General
Plan and Zoning Ordinance amendments and preparation of the CEOA documentation (EIR). Ms. Griffith is managing the preparing
of the EIR. The planning area encompasses approximately 112 acres of the City. The Westgate Specific Plan area faces ongoing
blighting conditions and a planning fmmework which does not incorporate current methods used to address redevelopment goals.
The existing planning framework is geared towards single-purpose, segregated land use. The Specific Plan focuses on current land
use trends including Transit Oriented Design, Infill Development, and Form Based Codes. These methods seek to address the
advent of commuter rail the lack of vaant land, and the need to provide integrated use patterns where design is stric[ly controlled.
• City M Poatto, fiiaffo Renewable Energy Center Environmental Impact repod (ReMech EIR). Ms. Griffith is the senior project manager
for a biomass facility that will convect urban green waste tobiomass-based renewable fuel and power. Renewable fuel products will
be produced from recycled materials such as yard waste (leaves, grass, and tree limbs), shredded constmction or demolition
lumber waste which will be sold to heavy consumers such as airports, foal and regional government. The project is a 21.2 acre site
loafed in the City of Rialto, and consists of two parcels. It is loafed in the Heavy Industrial zone of the Agua Manua Specific Plan,
County of San Bernardino, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan DR Ms. Griffith is the project manager far the County of San Bernardino
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan EIR. The project consists of the proposed adoption a General Plan Amendment, a GHG Emissions
Reduction Plan (GHG Plan) and associated Development Code Amendment to include greenhouse gas emissions reduction policy
provisions and specific procedures for implementing development related provisions of the GHG Plan in the development code.
The framework of the GHG Plan consists of: (1) an inventory of GHG emissions that identifies and quantifies existing emissions and
projected future emissions; (2) a reduction target to reduce existing GHG emissions by 15% by 2020; and, (2) the goals, objectives
and strategies that have been devised to reduce existing emissions to meet the reduction target. The County's GHG Plan and its
reduction target are based on Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and the Califomia Air Resources Board (GARB) recommendations to ensure
that Califomia emissions are reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020.
P-337
Page 3
Danielle T. Griffith P-338
Project Manager for Environmental Analysis
• Part at San Diego, Natiorel City Marine Tennir~l Reconfiguration Project Ms. Griffith is the project manager for the a Mitigated
Negative Declaration National City Marine Terminal Reconfiguration Project to maximize the use of limited terminal land, enhance
ergo flow for existing tenants, and increase storage opacity for lumber and automobiles. The proposed project would provide
room for expansion, increase revenue, and consolidate cedain tenant operalions.
City of EasNale, Planning Stag Ms. Griffith serves as the senior environmental planner for the newly incorporated City of EasNale,
in Riverside County. In addition to providing all of the typical Planning Department services, such as zoning inquiries, processing
use permits, and performing CEQA analyses, PMC and Ms. Griffith has been instmmental in literally creating the City's
environmental planning stmcture. Ms. Griffith prepares the necessary environmental documentation of hehalt of the City including
Initial Study/MND, ND, negative and EIRs far project applications.
• City of Palm Springs Ms. Griffith serves as the project manager for the CEOA and NEPA dowments for roadway and drainage
improvements in the City of Palm Springs. The project consists of a program that was earmarked to develop and enhance public
access to the new Agua Caliente Cultural Museum to be constructed al the southeast comer of Tahqui~ Canyon Way and Hermosa
Drive. The project also includes development of road and signage improvements to the museum.
Professional Affiliations
Association of Environmental Professionals
Urban Land Institute -Future Build LA 2010, 2011 Planning Committee Member
Page 4
P-339
EXHIBIT C
COST SUBMITTAL #2 (IS/MND)
RFQ #10/11-204 Development Code Consulting Services
(must be submitted in a separately sealed envelope)
TASK 1. PROJECT INITIATION WITH CONSULTANT TEAM AND IN-HOUSE TEAM (RC TEAM)
Subtask 1.1 Project Kick-off Meeting and Work Program Refinement $4,000
Subtask 1.2 Revised Scope of Work $800
TASK 2. ISSUES IDENTIFICATION AND DIRECTION
Subtask 2.1 Data Collection, Review, and Evaluation $9,200
Subtask 2.2 Analysis of Code Issues and Alternatives $4,800
Subtask 2.3 Work Session with PMC and RC Team $4,000
Subtask 2.4 Preparation of Annotated Outline $1,200
Subtask 2.5 Public Workshops $15,000
Subtask 2.6 Stakeholder Interviews $4,000
TASK 3. PREPARE DRAFT DEVELOPMENT CODE/SIGN CODE
Subtask 3.1 Administrative Draft Development Code/Sign Code $48,000
Subtask 3.2 Draft Zoning Map Changes $8,800
Subtask 3.3 Peer-Review by RC Team $1,000
Subtask 3.4 Public Draft Development Code and Map $6,000
Subtask 3.5 Joint PC/CC Workshop $4,000
TASK 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS -INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Subtask 4.1 Prepare Initial Study /Environmental Document $15,000
Subtask 4.2 Preparation of Responses to Comments $3,500
Subtask 4.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMRP) $1,000
Subtask 4.4 Findings of Fact and Notice of Determination $3,000
TASK 5. ADOPTION
Subtask 5.1 Public Notification, Circulation, and Response to Inquiries $6,400
Subtask 5.2 Planning Commission Hearings $7,400
Subtask 5.3 City Council Hearings $7,400
Subtask 5.4 Final Development Code Document and Zoning Map $8,000
TASK 6. FOLLOW UP AND IMPLEMENTATION
Subtask 6.1 Consistency Analysis for Other Adopted Plans $7,800
Total $170,300
Note: PMC understands that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide payment for services
performed for a fixed fee total contract amount, with incremental payments made upon completion of
each milestone or task. However, in the event that progress on any milestone or task is delayed for
thirty days or longer due to no fault of PMC, we request payment on a percentage completed basis for
services performed up until the point of delay.
PMC ~~
P-340
STAFF REPORT '~ ~~- -; ``~"
REDEVELOPiv(ENTACENCY
RANCHO
Date: April, 20, 2010 (;UCAMONCA
To: Chairman and Members of the Redevelopment Agency
Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director
From: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager
Subject: APPROVE THE SOURCES OF PAYMENT AND NECESSARY BUDGET
APPROPRIATION FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY'S SHARE OF THE STATE BUDGET DEFICIT REDUCTION
(SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL REVENUE AUGMENTATION FUND) FOR
FISCAL YEAR 10/11 (FUND 2500801-5519 TO PAY $5,944,060; AND FUND
2505801-5519 TO PAY $660,451) TOTALING $6,604,511.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the sources of payment for the Redevelopment Agency's share of the State Budget Deficit
Reduction in the amount of $6,604,511 ($5,944,060 from Fund 2500801-5519; and $660,451 from
Fund 2505801-5519); authorize staff to pay the County Auditor/Controller by May 10, 2011
pursuant to State requirements; and approve a budget appropriation to Funds 2500801-5519 and
2505801-5519 in the same amounts.
BACKGROUND
Due to the State budget crisis, redevelopment agencies will be required to pay a total of
$2.05 billion to help balance the State's budget ($1.7 billion in FY 2009-10 and another $350 million
in FY 2010-11). These funds will be deposited in the county "Supplemental" Educational Revenue
Augmentation Funds (SERAF) to be distributed to schools to meet the State's Proposition 98
obligations to education. Rancho Cucamonga's total liability is $38,714,390 ($32,109,879 in FY
2009-10 and $6,604,511 in FY 2010-11).
The budget act legislation requires that each redevelopment agency notify the County Auditor/
Controller by March 1, 2011 to designate how the money will be paid. The SERAF payment is
required to be deposited with the County by May 10, 2011.
The Agency will use funds that have been allocated for projects and capital needs in order to pay
the required SERAF amount. Specffically, funds that have been reserved for the second phase of
Central Park and the I-15IArrow Highway Interchange will be reduced, thus jeopardizing the overall
funding for these much needed projects. Also, the Fire Fund's payment will come from the reserve
for future equipment and vehicle needs that are critical to keeping our resources in the best service
condition possible. Reduced funding could also jeopardize public safety facility projects.
The California Redevelopment Association has recommended that the following language be part of
the March 1, 2011 transmittal letter to the .County Auditor that designates how the Agency will be
paying its SERAF obligation:
"As you may know, the validity of the legislation mandating this SERAF transfer has been
challenged in litigation pending in the Superior Court for Sacramento County, California
Redevelopmenf Association et al. v. Genest et al., Case No. 34-2009-80000359-CU-WM-GDS
P-341'
S'GU~F REPORT'-APPROVE,TI-IL•SOURCES OF PAYMENT FOR'CHP. 10/11 SERAF PAYMENT PAGE2
(CRA v. Genest). This case alleges, among other things, that the duties of county auditors under
Health and Safety Code Sections 33690(a) and 33690.5(a) to deposit funds received from
redevelopment agencies in County Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Funds are
inconsistent with various state and federal constitutional provisions and are therefore unlawful and
unenforceable. The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency reserves any rights it may have
to withhold the payment of funds to you under Health and Safety Code Section 33690 or to recover
those funds after payment or transfer based on any order or judgment of the Court in CRA v.
Genest."
To date, more than $49 million has been paid to the State of California by the Rancho Cucamonga
Redevelopment Agency. If not successfully challenged, the proposed 10/11 SERAF obligations will
result in cumulative payments to the State of more than $55 million. In the past, the State has
allowed for cone-year extension of time to the Redevelopment Plan when an ERAF payment is
required. However, there was no one-year extension opportunity with the 09/10 SERAF payment,
and there will be no one-year extension opportunity with the 10/11 SERAF payment.
Respectfully submitted,
`~~ ~.
Linda D. Daniels
Deputy City Manager
P-342
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: April 20, 2011 RANCHO
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUGAMONGA
Jack Lam, AICP, Cfty Manager
FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director
BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO HOME CONSORTIUM
COOPERATION AGREEMENT DRC2011-00302 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
- Approval of a 3-year cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino
Department of Community Development and Housing for participation in the County
HOME Consortium.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Cooperation Agreement and authorize the Mayor to execute
the documents.
BACKGROUND: The HOME Investment Partnerships Program ("HOME") is authorized under
Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act. The U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development administers the HOME Program and provides formula grants to
states and local governments for the creation of affordable housing opportunities for low-income
families. The HOME Program also allows local govemments to form a consortium for the purpose
of receiving and administering HOME funds.
In July of 1995, the City initially approved a Cooperation Agreement with the County of
San Bernardino for the purpose of creating a consortium of cities to receive HOME funds and
thereby participate in the San Bernardino County HOME Consortium. In July of 1996, the City
approved a 3-year extension to the Cooperation Agreement for the period from October 1, 1996 to
September 30, 1999. The City then approved a series of subsequent 3-year extensions to the
Cooperation Agreement for the periods ending September 30, 2002, September 30, 2005,
September 30, 2008, and September 30, 2011. The proposed extension to the Cooperation
Agreement will run for an additional 3-year period from October 1, 2011 to September 30, 2014.
ANALYSIS: The County of San Bemardino Department of Community Development and Housing
(CDH) administers the HOME Consortium with various cities in order to increase the allocation
received under the HOME program by allowing the population of these cities to be used in the
calculation of the County's allocation. Under the terms of this program, and as identified in the
City's Consolidated Plan, the County will make the following HOME programs available to
participating cities. These programs include:
HOME Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) - A silent second trust deed program
to assist low-income persons in becoming homeowners.
HOME Affordable Housing Development Loan (AHDL) Program -Provides financial
assistance in the form of gap financing to qualified individuals, for-profit entities, and
non-profds for the purpose of new construction, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of affordable
housing. Any rental housing developed with the assistance of HOME funds must benefit very
low-income households at fifty percent (50 percent) Area Median Income (AMI) or below.
Single-family housing must benefit low-income households at eighty percent (80 percent) AMI
or below.
P-343
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DRC2011-00302-CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
April 20, 2011
Page 2
Participation in the County HOME Consortium will require a minimum 25 percent funding match
contribution from any HOME eligible match source for each project designated to receive HOME
funds, however, existing City and Redevelopment Agency programs already in use in
Rancho Cucamonga will qualrfy for that match. There is no cost to the City or the Redevelopment
Agency for inclusion in the County HOME Consortium.
Respectfully submitted
~`t
Jams R. Troyer, AICP
Plan ing Director
JRT:TG/ge
Attachments: Exhibit A - CDH Housing Division Programs
Exhibit B -Cooperation Agreement for HOME Consortium
P-344
County of San Bernardino
Department of Community Development and Housing
Housing Division Programs
The Department of Community Development and Housing (CDH) manages a variety of affordable
housing programs funded/regulated at the federal, state, and local levels through its Housing Division.
The primary purpose of these housing programs is to expand the supply of decent, safe, sanitary, and
affordable housing for the residents of the County.
The following provides an overview of the County's HOME Program:
HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME):
The HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is a federally funded housing program created as a
result of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. The HOME Program serves
individuals and households, earning eighty percent (80%) or less of the Area Median Income (AMI) level
established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), who agree to reside in
housing located within the County of San Bernardino HOME Consortium area. The HOME Consortium
area includes all unincorporated areas of the County, as well as most cities within the County of San
Bernardino. HOME funds may NOT be used within the city limits of the following excluded cities: Chino,
Fontana, Hesperia, Ontario, Redlands, San Bernardino, Upland, Victorville and the Town of Apple Valley.
Homeownership Assistance Program (HAPI
The Homeownership Assistance Program (HAP) serves households earning eighty percent (80%)
or less of the AMI level established by HUD. Applicants must have lived or worked in San
Bernardino County for at least one year and not currently own their own home. The prospective
homebuyer must be able to contribute at least three percent (3%) of the purchase price of the
home, qualify for private first mortgage financing, and make monthly payments on the first
mortgage. This Program provides single family homeownership opportunities -the "American
Dream" of owning ahome -through funding closing costs, down payments, and gap financing
(the difference between the market value of the property and the sales price that is affordable to
the purchaser). HOME assistance is provided under a deferred loan (Silent Second), secured by
a Deed of Trust. The property will be the applicant's principal residence. Applications are
accepted from participating lenders on behalf of eligible prospective buyers on a first-come first-
served basis.
Affordable Housing Development Loan Program
The Affordable Housing Development Loan Program provides financial assistance in the form of
gap financing to qualified individuals, for-proft entities, and non-profits for the purpose of new
construction, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Any rental housing
developed with the assistance of HOME funds must benefit very low-income households at fifty
percent (50%) or less of the AMI and low-income households at eighty percent (80%) or less of
the AMI.
P-345
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM
This Agreement is made by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter
called "CITY") and the County of San Bernardino (hereinafter called "COUNTY").
WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has enacted the Cranston-Gonzalez
National Affordable Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 12701 of seq.) and Federal
Regulations have been adopted pursuant thereto, (hereinafter called the "ACT"); and,
WHEREAS, Title II of the ACT creates the HOME Investment Partnership Program,
(hereinafter called "HOME"), that provides funds to states and local governments for the
acquisition, refinance; rehabilitation, and new construction of affordable housing and tenant-
based rental assistance; and,
WHEREAS, the ACT requires local governments to formulate and submit a Consolidated
Plan, (hereinafter called "Con-Plan"), as part of the eligibility requirements for HOME funds in
accordance with section 91.215 of the Consolidated Plan final rule; and,
WHEREAS, funds from Title II are distributed to metropolitan cities, urban counties,
states, and consortia of local governments; and,
WHEREAS, the ACT allows local governments to farm a consortia for the purpose of
receiving and administering HOME funds and carrying out purposes of the ACT; and,
WHEREAS, the ACT requires that a local government member of an urban county may
participate in a Consortium only through the urban county; and,
WHEREAS, the ACT requires that a Consortium shall have one member unit of general
local government authorized to act in a representative capacity for all members for the purposes
of the ACT and to assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the Consortium's HOME
Program is carried out in compliance with the ACT, including requirements concerning the Con-
Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that:
1. CITY and COUNTY will cooperate in the forming of the County of San Bernardino
HOME Consortium, (hereinafter called the "CONSORTIUM"), for the purpose of undertaking or
assisting in undertaking, HOME-eligible housing assistance activities pursuant to Title II of the
ACT, including but not limited to acquiring, rehabilitating, and constructing affordable housing.
~as~~~~~ ~ Pagelot7
P-346
2. COUNTY shall act as the representative member of the CONSORTIUM for purposes of
the ACT and assume overall responsibility for ensuring that the CONSORTIUM'S HOME
Program is carried out in compliance with the requirements of the Program, including
requirements concerning aCon-Plan.
3. CITY shall provide to COUNTY in a timely manner, all necessary information and
documentation as requested by COUNTY for incorporation into COUNTY'S Con-Plan in
compliance with Program Requirements.
4. CITY shall have thirty (30) calendar days to approve the portions of the Con-Plan which
pertain to the CITY before COUNTY submits the final Con-Plan to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). COUNTY shall incorporate CITY'S changes in Con-
Plan, if any, provided that they meet HOME Requirements. CITY shall identify any areas
designated for affordable housing activities within their jurisdiction. CITY shall provide maps
and/or detailed descriptions of such areas upon execution of this document.
5. CITY shall approve each project funded with competitive HOME funds within their
boundaries prior to COUNTY approving funding of such projects, provided that the CITY'S
approval or disapproval does not obstruct the implementation of the approved Con-Plan.
6. CITY shall designate the City Administrator, City Manager or his/her designee ("City
Representative") to whom all notices and communications from COUNTY shall be directed.
COUNTY'S duty to notify CITY shall be complete when the communication is sent to the
designated City Representative. It is the exclusive duty of the City Representative to notify the
appropriate individuals and departments within the CITY.
7. To carry out activities under this Agreement, COUNTY shall allocate HOME funds
received under the ACT to those HOME activities described in the COUNTY'S Con-Plan. If
necessary to meet HOME Requirements, funds will be reallocated by COUNTY in accordance
with such needs, objectives, or strategies as COUNTY shall decide. In preparing such needs,
objectives, or strategies, COUNTY shall consult with CITY before making its determinations.
8. CITY shall contribute a minimum twenty-five percent (25%) funding match contribution
from any HOME-eligible match source for each project designated to receive HOME funds.
9. COUNTY and CITY shall comply with all applicable requirements of the ACT and its
regulations in utilizing basic grant funds under the ACT and shall take all actions necessary to
assure compliance with COUNTY certifications required by the ACT. COUNTY and CITY will
comply with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Title VI and VII of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Executive Order 11986, the
California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), and other applicable federal laws. CITY
agrees that HOME funding for activities in, or in support of, CITY is prohibited if CITY does not
take action or participate in programs that affirmatively further fair housing within their own
jurisdiction or impede COUNTY actions to comply with its fair housing certification. CITY may
be required to demonstrate how it complies with the fair housing requirement.
Furthermore, CITY hereby covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns, and all
persons claiming under or through them that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation
of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, familial
status, disability, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy,
tenure, or enjoyment of any Project funded by HOME funds, nor shall CITY itself or any person
Page 2 of 7
P-347
claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or
segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants,
lessees, subtenants, sublessees, or vendees in any Project funded as a result of this Agreement.
The CITY shall refrain from restricting the rental, sale or lease of any Project funded as a
result of this Agreement on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, familial
status, disability, national origin or ancestry of any person.
10. CITY shall provide COUNTY with all information concerning CITY and the activities CITY
carries out under this Agreement which COUNTY requires to prepare: 1) documents required to
be submitted to HUD, 2) annual HOME Performance Report, and 3) such other documents as
COUNTY may require to carry out eligible housing activities or meet federal requirements. All
information shall be submitted on forms prescribed by COUNTY. In addition, CITY agrees to
make available upon request all records concerning the activities carried out under this
Agreement for inspection by COUNTY or federal officials during regular business hours.
11. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless COUNTY, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses
of any type, and from liability for any fines, penalties or damages of any type, (including, but not
limited to, a repayment of funds to HUD) resulting from CITY's performance of this Agreement
and caused by any act or omission of CITY, including failure to comply with any requirement of
the ACT or the HOME Program described herein except to the extent that any such claims,
suits, actions, losses, or liability arises from any act or omission of COUNTY.
12. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, COUNTY shall defend, indemnify and
hold harmless CITY, its officers, employees, and agents from all claims, suits, actions or losses
of any type, and from liability for all fines, penalties or damages of any type, (including, but not
limited to, a repayment of funds to HUD) resultirig from COUNTY's performance of this
Agreement and caused by any act or omission of COUNTY, including failure to comply with any
requirement of the ACT or the HOME Program described herein, except to the extent that any
such claims, suits, actions, losses, or liability arises from any act or omission of CITY.
13. This Agreement shall go into effect immediately upon execution by all signatories to the
Agreement and shall continue in full force and in effect until all activities funded under the terms
of this Agreement, and any income generated from the expenditure of such funds, are
expended and the funded activities are completed. CITY is included in the CONSORTIUM for a
period of three (3) federal fiscal years commencing on October 1, 2011, through September 30,
2014. No CONSORTIUM member may withdraw from the Agreement while the Agreement
remains in effect.
14. This Agreement authorizes the COUNTY, as the lead entity, to amend the
CONSORTIUM Agreement on behalf of the entire CONSORTIUM to add new members to the
CONSORTIUM. Any other amendments to this Agreement must be made in writing and
approved by all parties.
15. Notices. Any notice requirement set forth herein shall be deemed to be satisfied five (5)
days after mailing of the notice first-class, postage prepaid, addressed to the appropriate party as
follows:
Page 3 of 7
P-348
CITY: City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Attn: Jack Lam, City Manager
COUNTY: Department of Community Development and Housing
County of San Bemardino
290 North "D" Street, Sixth Floor
San Bemardino, CA 92415-0040
Attn: Kathy Thomas, Director of Redevelopment and Housing
Such addresses may be changed by notice to the other parry given in the same manner as
provided above.
16. In the event CITY fails to satisfy any of the requirements herein, COUNTY shall provide
a Notice of Default ("Notice of Default") describing the default and an opportunity to cure within
thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice of Default. If the default is not cured within that period or
if the commencement of a cure of the Default has not occurred and is not being diligently
prosecuted, COUNTY may employ any remedy legally available, including but not limited to,
termination of the CITY's participation in this Agreement.
17. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Funding (ARRA)
Use of ARRA Funds and Requirements
This Contract may be funded in whole or in part with funds provided by the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA"), signed into law on February 17, 2009.
Section 1605 of ARRA prohibits the use of recovery funds for a project for the construction,
alteration, maintenance or repair of a public building or public work (both as defined in 2 CFR
176.140) unless all of the iron, steel and manufactured goods (as defined in 2 CFR 176.140)
used in the project are produced in the United States. A waiver is available under three (3)
limited circumstances: (i) Iron, steel or relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the
United States in sufficient and reasonable quantities and of a satisfactory quality; (ii) Inclusion of
iron, steel or manufactured goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the
overall project by more than twenty five percent (25%); or (iii) Applying the domestic preference
would be inconsistent with the public interest. This is referred to as the "Buy American"
requirement. Request fora waiver must be made to the County for an appropriate
determination.
Section 1606 of ARRA requires that laborers and mechanics employed by contractors
and subcontractors on projects funded directly by or assisted in whole or in part by and through
the Federal Government pursuant to ARRA shall be paid wages at rates not less than those
prevailing on projects of a character similar in the locality as determined by the Secretary of
Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 31). This is referred to as the "wage
rate" requirement.
The above described provisions constitute notice under ARRA of the Buy American and
wage rate requirements. Contractor must contact the County contact if it has any questions
regarding the applicability or implementation of the ARRA Buy American and wage rate
requirements. Contractor will also be required to provide detailed information regarding
compliance with the Buy American requirements, expenditure of funds and wages paid to
Page 4 of 7
P-349
employees so that the County may fulfll any reporting requirements it has under ARRA. The
information may be required as frequently as monthly or quarterly. Contractor agrees to fully
cooperate in providing information or documents as requested by the County pursuant to this
provision. Failure to do so will be deemed a default and may result in the withholding of
payments and termination of this Contract.
Contractor may also be required to register in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
database attsat~.xcsrmw and may be required to have its subcontractors also register in
the same database. Contractor must contact the County with any questions regarding
registration requirements.
Schedule of Expenditure of Federal Awards
In addition to the requirements described in "Use of ARRA Funds and Requirements,"
proper accounting and reporting of ARRA expenditures in single audits is required. Contractor
agrees to separately identrfy the expenditures for each grant award funded under ARRA on the
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC)
required by the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations." This identification on the SEFA and SF-SAC shall
include the Federal award number, the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number, and amount such that separate accountability and disclosure is provided for ARRA
funds by Federal award number consistent with the recipient reports required by ARRA Section
1512 (c).
In addition, Contractor agrees to separately identify to each subcontractor and document
at the time of sub-contract and at the time of disbursement of funds, the Federal award number,
any special CFDA number assigned for ARRA purposes, and amount of ARRA funds.
Contractor may be required to provide detailed information regarding expenditures so
that the County may fulfill any reporting requirements under ARRA described in this section.
The information may be required as frequently as monthly or quarterly. Contractor agrees to
fully cooperate in providing information or documents as requested by the County pursuant to
this provision. Failure to do so will be deemed a default and may result in the withholding of
payments and termination of this Contract.
Whistleblower Protection
Contractor agrees that both it and its subcontractors shall comply with Section 1553 of the
ARRA, which prohibits all non-Federal contractors, including the State, and all contractors of the
State, from discharging, demoting or otherwise discriminating against an employee for
disclosures by the employee that the employee reasonably believes are evidence of: (1) gross
mismanagement of a contract relating to ARRA funds; (2) a gross waste of ARRA funds; (3) a
substantial and specific danger to public health or safety related to the implementation or use of
ARRA funds; (4) an abuse of authority related to the implementation or use of recovery funds; or
(5) a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract (including the competition
for or negotiation of a contract) awarded or issued relating to ARRA funds.
Contractor agrees thaf it and ifs subcontractors shall post notice of the rights and remedies
available to employees under Section 1553 of Division A, Title XV of the ARRA.
Page 5 of 7
P-350
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM
SIGNATURE PAGE
18. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as
if all signatories had signed the same document. All counterparts must be construed together to
constitute one (1) instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
below.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City Administrator Date
Attest:
City Clerk
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Date
Page 6 of 7
P-351
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR HOME CONSORTIUM
SIGNATURE PAGE
19. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as
if all signatories had signed the same document. All counterparts must be construed together to
constitute one (1) instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
below.
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOSIE GONZALES, Chair
Board of Supervisors
SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO
LAURA H. WELCH
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
JEAN-RENE BASLE
COUNTY COUNSEL
Michelle Blakemore
Chief Assistant County Counsel
Date
Date
Date
Page 7 of 7