Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1999/11/03 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. November 3, 1999 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander Biane Curatalo __., DuttOn , and ~illiams. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of the winner of the Rancho Cucamonga Census 2000 Poster Contest. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring "World Town Planning Day." C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/13/99 and 10/29/99, and Payroll ending 10/14/99 for the total amount of $1,757,983.81. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for La Paloma Market (transfer of license), Samoue Salim F., 8847 Archibald Avenue. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Top Valu Market (transfer of license), K V Mart Co., 6351 Haven Avenue. Approval to appropriate $20,969 from Fund 24 -"Engineering - Street Transportation Program" (A/C 24-4637-9825) to complete the Office of Traffic Safety Grant Project No. TR 9817 to provide a collision database and analysis system. Approval to appropriate $70,000 from Fund 20 (Park Development Reserve) for additional work on the Central Park Project. 10 12 14 15 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 Approval of Request from San Bernardino County Sheriff's Athletic Federation for City to Co-Sponsor California Police and Fire Games 2000 to be held at selected venues in the Inland Empire, including Beryl Park, Red Hill Community Park and Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Sports Complex, On June 26 - July 1, 2000, and to waive associated fees and charges. Approval of a Request from San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's West Valley Search and Rescue Team for City to Co- Sponsor Annual Fun Run and Safety Fair on April 29, 2000, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and to waive associated fees and charges. Approval to abandon the proceedings and to cancel public hearings to consider termination of the authority to levy special taxes within Community Facilities District 91-1 and Improvement Area No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 99-230 17 20 23 25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TO ABANDON PROCEEDINGS AND TO CANCEL PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER THE TERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT AS A WHOLE AND WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF SUCH DISTRICT Approval of applications for Grant Funds from the Transportation Enhancement Act Activities Program and the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Station Beautification Project, and the application for funds from the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program for the Landscape Enhancement and Improvement Project for the 210 Foothill Freeway Extension within Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 99-231 27 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-232 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE 210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY EXTENSION IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 99-233 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT 10. 11. 12. 13. Approval to appropriate $48,000 annually to Acct. No. 01-4285- 6028 and the execution of Professional Consulting Agreement (CO 99-096) to David Turch and Associates to provide federal legislative advocacy services. Approval to award a contract (CO 99-097) to RJM Design Group in the amount of $15,000 to be funded from Fund 20 (Park Development) for additional work on the Central Park Project. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 99-098) with Holmes and Narver, Inc. to provide project study report services for future interchange and signal modifications at Base Line Road and 1-15 Freeway in the amount of $79,150, and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded from Account No. 22-4637-9922. Approval of an Agreement (CO 99-099) for the City to acquire an Off-site Easement, Security, and Deposit for Tentative Tract No. 15711, located north of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue, submitted by RC Homes, LLC - Foothill Meadows. 34 35 36 38 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 4 RESOLUTION NO. 99-234 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15711, FROM RC HOMES, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME 14. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 99-15, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-235 41 43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-15 15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tract 14379, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Centex Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 99-236 44 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14379 16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tract 14459, located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues, submitted by Alta Loma One and Two, A Joint Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 99-237 47 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14459 17. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 15155, submitted by Master Development Corporation, located on the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and White Oak Avenue. 50 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 441231S Accept:: Maintenance Bond 441231S $175,000.00 $ 17,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 99-238 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15155 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 52 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No items submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071- 01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential {8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071- 01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 53 53 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-239 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL; AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 ORDINANCE NO. 611 88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue-APN: 210-062-31. Related files: Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISPA) 99-02, Development District Amendment (DDA) 99-03, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. 92 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES A request to change the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 o ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 92 10. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 99-240 92 92 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF --APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 612 164 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 613 168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 RESOLUTION NO. 99-241 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRES FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 10 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 614 176 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 615 180 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 RESOLUTION NO. 99-242 184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 ORDINANCE NO. 617 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 11 188 192 The following requirements. testimony. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS items have no legal publication or posting The Chair will open the meeting to receive public No items submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No items submitted. City Council Agenda November 3, 1999 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL'S LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION (Oral) 12 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1999, 6:00 P.M. IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM FOR A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING WITH THE CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 28, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. VENDOR 11798 545 11798 4635 6371 4373 3785 14 6309 5231 21&40 21633 2644 21637 6318 5807 1040 21638 6372 33 1247 21646 6390 4369 5341 2559 21641 21639 21634 21642 6052 73 74 914 21636 21635 643 2258 21644 21645 85 239 284 6145 5121 60 4366 4105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 10-13-99 (99/00) NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 10/13/99 WARR NO WARR. AMT~ RAMOS, MARILYN RED WINC SHOE STORE RAMOS, MARILYN A & K PHOTOGRAPHY ABC CLIO ACO SANITATION ACTION ART ACTION TRAVEL A~ENCY ADAMSON, RONALD AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTINg, INC. A~UILERA, LUCIE ALEXANDER STEEL SALES, INC. ALPERT~S PRINTINO ALVAREZ, BETHIA APPLE ONE EMPLOYMENT SERVICES ARCHITERRA DESIQN ~ROUP BA~ER, DUANE BAN~E~ COLLEEN BARRON'S BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE BLAKE PAPER CO , INC~ BLUE FOUNTAIN POOLS BPI COMMUNICATIONS BRODART BOOKS BUC½NAM & ASSOCIATES C A L B 0 CAMPBELL~ FRANCINE CAPALBY~ CORRINA CASA VERDE LANDSCAPE CEdA~ URIEL CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC~ CITY RENTALS CLAREMONT CAMERA & VIDEO~ INC~ CLEVELAND~ NlkkI COBB~ SUSAN COMPUTERLAND CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST~ ~ CORPORATE PRINTERS COX COMPUTER SERVICE CUCAMONQA CO WATER DIST D & k CONCRETE CO DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC DAVIS~ SAM DE VOOQHT~ SCOTT d~ DELTA DENTAL DEMCO~ INC~ DEPARTMENT OF dUSTICE INC. RECREATION REFUNDS SAFETY BOOTS RECREATION REFUNDS PHOTO DEVELOPIN~ & SUPPLIES ~USINESS LICENSE REFUND E~UIPMENT RENTAL RECREATION SUPPLIES AIRLINE TICKETS INSPECTION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES PRO~ESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECRIEATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES REFUND RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES CONSULTANT SERVICES CALBO ABM MEETIN~ RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND ADVERTISINQ FEE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES/SERVICES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY WATER BILLINQS STREET MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACT SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DENTAL INSURANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES FINQERPRINTS ~ CHECK# OVERLAP # 144639 # 144640 144641 - 144705 ~>~ 144706* 144707 - 144709 >>> # 144710 144711 144712 # 144713 # 144714 # 144715 # 144716 144717 144718 144719 144720 # 144721 144722 144723 144724 1447~5 144726 1447~7 # 144728 144729 144730 - 144733 >>)' # 144734 # 144735 144736 144737 144738 144739 144740 144741 # 14474~ # 144743 144744 144745 144746 # 144747 144748 144749 144750 # 144751 144752 144753 144754 144755 144756 144757 144758 89.00- 1,102.41- 39.00 11.29 85.69 131.68 2,492.80 758.00 2,304.00 2,850.00 40.00 10.19 255.78 45.00 2,484.96 1,584.00 100.00 39.00 73.49 38.78 2.36 289.40 10313.25 5,383.04 1,663.50 90.00 39.00 90.00 32.00 200.00 44.23 1,692.29 1,941.15 1,059.24 45.00 76.50 3,308.30 72.20 45.99 112.88 3,618.80 513.43 273.32 570.00 240.00 28,509.63 1,a28.81 2,496.00 PAOE: 1 VENDOR 107 410&g 41070 5968 3779 3875 41071 5937 2349 4914 5521 5917 6161 155 3197 4371 41059 41072 4762 2840 1144 6074 4540 41077 41073 3356 6297 2834 41074 3388 650 6356 137 4486 41075 41076 6277 31983 21647 4811 4811 161 6369 167 5882 103 4254 1121 908 6345 NAME DETCO DICKEY, MARTIN DICKINSON JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DINELEY, TOM DORNING, GLENN B. DUNN-EDWARDS CORPORATION E & D ELECTRIC, INC. EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING ESGIL CORP. EXCLUSIVE EMAOES EXPERIAN FASTENAL COMPANY FAXON ILLINOIS SERVICE CENTER FILARSkY & WATT FIRE MASTER FISHER SCIENTIFIC FLORES, ANN FONTILLA, DENISE FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER FORD OF UPLAND, INC. FRAME-ART FUkUSHIMA0 JUDITH GALE OROUP, THE GARCIA, CARLOS GARCIA, HEIDI OARCIA, VIVIAN GARMAN, MEQAN GEIOER BROTHERS WEST GLOBAL LOGISTICS SERVICE INC. OOLD£N BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. GRAINOER, W.W. GREENHAVEN QTE CALIFORNIA GUARDIAN GUILLEN, NELIDA QUTIERREZ CONTRUCTION GUZMAN, LESLIE HERMAN ENG. & MFQ. , INC. HOkE OUTDOOR HOLIDAY INN SELECT HOLIDAY INN SELECT HOYT LUMBER CO. , S.M. HUQHES, LASHONDAE I C B 0 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 I C M A RETIR£MENT TRUST-457 IBM CORPORATION INDEPENDENT ELECTRONICS INLAND MEDIATION BOARD INTEL NETWORk SYSTEMS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-13-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO OFFICE SUPPLIES TRAVEL & MEETINQS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION MONTHLY SERVICES MAINTENANCE SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND FAMILY SHELTER VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY BOOKS RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT CASH ADVANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINOS MEDICAL PREMIUM RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CONTRACT SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND HOTEL RESERVATIONS HOTEL RESERVATIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 01 DEFERRED COMP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. RECREATION REFUND ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 144759 144760 144761 144762 144763 144764 144765 144766 144767 144768 # 144769 # 14477O 144771 144772 144773 # 144774 # 144775 144776 144777 144778 144779 144780 # 144781 144782 144783 144784 144785 14478& 144787 # 144788 # 144789 144790 144791 - 144791 >>> # 144792 144793 144794 144795 144796 144797 144798 144799 144800 # 144801 144802 144803 # 144804 144805 # 144806 144807 # 144808 # 144809 10/13/99 PAQE: 2 WARR. AMT. 154.20 150.00 26.11 1,096.00 58.29 291.01 54.00 312.00 20,954.71 105.60 I00.00 3,426.45 134.71 297.50 122.70 230.86 255.00 28.75 250.00 418.91 36~.15 825.00 504.09 40.00 31.00 19.53 10.00 276.76 10.00 8,68~.00 687.~7 150. 53 2,816.26 834.24 39.00 186.86 125.00 ~7.50 500.00 404.30 673.84 348.43 243. O0 21.55 5,811.11 871.00 3,~67.37 60.32 1,866.11 845.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-13-99 (~9/00) VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE; 10/13/99 PAGE: 3 WARR NO WARR. AMT. 31~3 31~8~ 5654 3102 6090 4~82 31~81 31~84 31~82 3156 3201 3871 319~4 31987 5852 1754 31~80 2468 2545 744 31~88 21648 523 ~1643 ~1643 ~376 1823 31~90 31945 31985 757 104~ 31~86 4440 58~ 251 4713 345 2705 418 959 2600 117~ 4130 545 545 JACOBS~ JANET JOHANSEN, CARRIE KAPCO KNOTT'S BERRY FARM KONG, SOPHA½ KORANDA CONSTRUCTION LIBRARIES FOR THE FUTURE LOPEZ~ MARIA LOPEZ, SILVIA LU'S LIGHTHOUSE, INC. LUPE & JOHNNY'S BODY & PAINT SHOP LYON~ ALICIA MARTINEZ TOWING AND AUTOMOTIVE MATT'S HARDWARE MAXWELL~ JUDITH MEEKER, JOANNE MIDWEST TAPE MOORE~ DAVE MORFF, VICKY MRS NELSON'S TOY & BO0~ STORE NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION NATIONAL DEFERRED NEFF, COLLEEN NYLAND, SHARRON OFFICE DEPOT OPRYLAND HOTEL OPRYLAND HOTEL ORYX PAGENET PALMER, TAMI PARADA, KIMBERLY PARRISH, GENELLE PEP BOYS PIONEER-STANDARD ELECTRONICS POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI POWELL, SHANNON PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PUTMAN, BILL GUALITY ONE ENGRAVERS R & R AUTOMOTIVE R C MARKETING CO. R D 0 EGUIPMENT CO R H F, INC. R M A GROUP RADIO SHACK ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT RANNEY, RBM LOCK & KEY SERVICE RED WING SHOE STORE RED WING SHOE STORE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES KNOTT'S TICKETS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND C.D.B.~. LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND OIL ANALYSIS MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND TOWING SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES REIMB. /FOUNDERS DAY SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION SUPPLIES ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES DEFERRED COMP RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES RESERVATIONS RESERVATIONS RECREATION REFUND PAGING SERVICE RECREATION REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES WANG COMPUTER SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES <<4 i4484~ - VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # SUPPLIES # MAINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES SOIL TESTING SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SALARY AND BENEFITS # RECREATION REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SAFETY BOOTS # SAFETY BOOTS CHECK# OVERLAP 144810 44.00 144811 39.00 # 144812 315.20 # 144813 1,430.00 144814 480.00 144815 2,051.50 144816 36.85 144817 35.00 144818 200.00 # 144819 82.43 144820 641.15 144821 17.14 # 144822 180.00 144823 14.95 144824 200.00 144825 39.00 144826 76.96 144827 15000 144828 250.00 # 144829 593.07 14483O 15.00 144831 2,195.00 144832 39.00 144833 39.00 # 144834 1,919.66 144835 454.~1 144836 454.61 144837 71.50 144838 267.62 144839 39. OO 144840 200.00 144841 37.50 144842 39.81 # 144843 8,245.72 # 144844 144845 13.50 # 144846 7.42 144847 20.78 144848 21.55 144849 144850 3,817.85 144851 1,402.31 144852 55.71 144853 45.00 144854 1,23&.95 144855 4.30 144856 6,706.33 144857 50.00 144858 3.23 144859 952.41 144860 15000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-13-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/13/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME 5665 11825 5618 276 16 4704 300 5029 301 11826 4350 1105 3946 319 987 1432 3632 11832 5281 11827 11828 11833 1151 4569 5626 4351 6244 5010 5233 1226 3844 2682 11829 11829 5870 478 11830 213 11831 6392 509 371 6283 REQULATION COMPLIANCE, INC. RHINO LININQS OF RANCHO RICHARDS, WATSON~ & GERSHON RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ROTARY CORPORATION RUSH, CHRIS SAN BERN COUNTY SAN BERN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS SAVE-A-LOT SCHNEIDERWENT, KAREN SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. SMITH COMPANY SO CALIF ~AS COMPANY SOUTH COAST A ~ M D SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION STEPHANIE~S COLLECTIBLES STERICYCLE, INC. STEUBEN, CINDY SUAREZ, TONY T. C.S.A. SOUTH TECHNIC TEE~S PLUS TIMEMARK INC. TOBIN, RENEE TOOLS-R-US TRADEMARK INDUSTRIES UNISTRUT UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UNITED RENTALS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE VERANDA COMMUNICATIONS, INC VERANDA COMMUNICATIONS, INC VLSYSTEMS, INC. WARREN & CO., CARL WATANABE, SHANI WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP WHILES, PATTY WHITEHEAD, MARK WILLDAN ASSOCIATES XEROX CORPORATION ZEE MEDICAL. SERVICE ZOLEZIO, MICKEY ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHECK# OVERLAP TRAININQ SERVICES 144861 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 144862 LEQAL SERVICES # 144863 PRINTS # 144864 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 144865 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 144866 REIMB PARKING CITATIONS 144867 UNDERQROUND TANKS 144868 CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 144869 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 144870 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 144871 OFFICE SUPPLIES 144872 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 144873 MONTHLY QAS BILLS 144874 STORAGE TANK 14487~ 4{'~ 144876 - 14487~ MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 14~880 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 144881 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 144882 SHARPS PRO~RAM # 144883 RECREATION REFUNDS 144884 RECREATION REFUNDS 144885 CERTIFICATION 144886 OFFICE SUPPLIES 144887 POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES 144888 SUPPLIES 144889 RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT 144890 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 144891 SUPPLIES 14489~ SUPPLIES 144893 UPS SERVICE 144894 RENTAL 144895 POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 1448~6 TAPE SUBSCRIPTION 144897 TAPE SUBSCRIPTION 144898 COMPUTER HARDWARE # 144899 LIABILITY CLAIMS # 144900 CLAIM SETTLEMENT 144901 MAINT SUPPLIES # 144902 RECREATION REFUNDS 144903 RECREATION REFUND 144904 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 144~05 COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 144906 RECREATION SUPPLIES 144907 ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIgHT-OF-WAY 144908 652.00 7.50 28,793.83 160,65 87.26 99.00 1,030,00 1,660.50 173.28 7.50 40.75 157.05 4,601.78 55.35 48.20 6,536.08 641.01 60.00 277.40 39.00 45.00 375.00 245.00 264.06 813.13 23.22 1,830.67 1,318.00 4,842.2~ 95.59 4,500.00 108.00 45,00 8,87~. 50 1,571.36 713.11 1,138.18 50.00 120.00 1,622.88 572.24 12.72 360,00 TOTAL 239,048.37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A LiST OF WARRANT5 FOR PERIOD: 10-20-~9 (9~/00) VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 10/20/99 WARE NO WARR. AMT. 4982 5960 2559 3901 2732 4347 5792 211 1826 6199 3448 973 492 6042 45&7 5807 667 2437 5756 4102 21650 4475 21654 5791 5119 4407 6338 1247 6357 4833 4699 21652 1166 4949 4735 488 &384 5407 5763 4301 KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 91 EXPRESS LANES C AL B 0 3-D CARPET & DRAPERY ABC LOCKSMITHS ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK & ADAM, ROBERT ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL WELDING ALLEN, TONY ALPHAGR APH I CS AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN RIGGING & SUPPLY CO., APPLIED CONCEPTS ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE AUDIO REPLACEMENT TAPE SERVICE B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE B I R C BARNES & NOBLE BAUST, CARL BELETTO, NANCY BENEFIELD, KINGSLEY BENSON, MAURY BETTER ENERGY IDEAS BIG 5 SPORTING GOOD8 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC. BLOCKBUSTER VIDEO BOOKS ON TAPE, INC~ BORDNER, MARGIE BOSLEY, DORA BRODART BOOKS BRUNSWICK DEER CREEK LANES BURK-BLACKSCHLEGER, ROSEANN CLOUT CALOLYMP IC SAFETY CAPIN CROUSE, LLP CAPPUCC ILLI, VICKI CHEVRON U S A, INC CHILDREN'S PLUS, INC. CLARK, KAREN COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE COMPUMASTER COMPUSA, INC. INC. C.D.B.G. TRANSPONDERS CALBO ABM MEETING <<< 144912 - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES <<< 144915 - MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ALARM SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS PROGRESS PAYMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIRS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES APA MEMBER8HIP DUES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COMPUTER SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION LIBRARY SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PMT RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PMT REGISTRATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND GASOLINE CHARGES LIBRARY SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CANCELLATION FEE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES <<< ~* CHECK# OVERLAP 144909- 3,474.00 144910* ~00.00 144911* 130.00 144913 144914 144915 144916 1,898.28 144917 202.69 144918 1&5.60 144919 282.00 144~20 - 144920 # 144921 4,542.61 144922 221,892.37 144923 330.00 # 144924 534.00 144925 234.09 144926 340.00 144927 390.57 144928 442.31 144929 1,138.15 # 144930 1,112.59 # 144931 1,965.19 144932 # 144933 507.98 144934 55.00 # 144935 6,811.98 144936 105.00 144937 40.80 144938 118.80 144939 472.32 144940 247.50 144941 96.81 # 144942 72.09 144943 50.00 144944 5.39 # 144945 747.00 144946 17.00 # 144947 565.61 144948 436.00 144949 3,887.00 144950 16.00 # 144951 111.0~ 144952 170.88 144953 33.60 144954 55.05 144955 1,398.81 144956 390.00 144957 1,356.00 144958 398.00 144960 - 1449~1 PAGE: 1 I I 1 l i i i i l i l l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-20-99 (99/00) VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 10/20/99 PAGE: WARR NO WARR. AMT. 130 4~08 21651 COMPUTER SERVICE CO CONCEPT POWDER COATING CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPTS 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST 85 CUCAMONQA CO WATER DIST 239 D & K CONCRETE CO 4488 DAGHDEVIRIAN0 KATHY 5121 DE VOOGHT° SCOTT d. 4366 DEMCO, INC. 3909 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 4544 DICK, ERIC 5809 DIETERICH-POST COMPANY 5744 DIRECTV 5788 DUFFY, RICK/USKO 41078 DUNN, MICHELE 4205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC. 5370 E-Z UP FACTORY OUTLET 4524 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL E~UIPMENT INC. 5137 EMPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE 380~ ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT 6161 FAXON ILLINOIS SERVICE CENTER 6087 FELIPE'S TAQUERIA 4371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 3178 FOWLER, MARK ~3~ GADABOUT TOURS, INC 4540 GALE GROUP, THE ~070 GALE ~ROUP, THE 5502 GIORDANO, MARlANNA 3388 ~OLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS~ INC. 1245 ~ONSALVE8 & SON, dOE A. 41079 GOODSON, KEVIN ~129 GOODWIN, WENDY 4014 GRANT, RITA 3827 gREEN ROC~ POWER E~UIPMENT 5387 GRT TELECOM CALIFORNIA 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 41021 GUIREY, THERESA 6277 GUZMAN, LESLIE 6127 HANGER 18 3661 HARLEQUIN COSTUME, A. 6396 HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS 32007 HARRISON~ STARR 5774 HARUYAMA, JENNY 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. 3334 HEILIG, KELLY 2256 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 4928 HOCKEY WEST 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. 2255 HOLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES DEPOSIT REFUND MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS STREET MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES STRONG MOTION FEE EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH OFFICE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND OFFICE EGUIPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIBRARY SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FACILITY RENTAL LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION REFRESHMENTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION LIBRARY BO0~S LIBRARY BOOKS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGISLATIVE SERVICES RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT CONTRACT SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INTERNET SERVICES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND CONTRACT SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION MILEAGE EGUIPMENT MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MAINTENANCE EGUIPMENT RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ CHECK# OVERLAP # 144962 10,736.22 144963 295.00 144964 500.00 144965 - 144968 # 144969 33,585.28 144970 5,000.00 # 144971 1,206.81 144972 467.78 144973 210.00 144974 299.93 144975 7,986.00 # 144976 75.00 144977 160.09 144978 27.99 144979 264.00 144980 45.00 144981 58.95 144982 76.75 # 144983 283.01 144984 2,115.00 144985 770.00 144986 2,096.12 144987 191.21 # 144988 520.00 144989 1,005.34 144990 898.20 144991 93.83 # 144992 276.29 144993 136.80 # 144~94 1~875.00 144995 2,300.00 144996 2.50 144997 27.00 144998 50.00 # 144999 175.93 145000 1,060.00 145001 - 145001 # 145002 7,988.23 145003 15.00 145004 140.00 145005 145006 22.50 145007 15.62 145008 35.00 145009 112.01 145010 73.26 145011 1,050. 72 145012 1,290. 74 145013 1, # 145014 4, 146. 57 145015 156.24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-20-99 (99/00) VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 10/20/99 PACE: 3 WARR NO WARR. AMT. 1~34 32012 161 2412 6369 4188 3276 1218 637~ 4747 90S 6202 4077 6238 31~8~ 47O0 6375 32003 4128 2220 5894 32000 4551 32002 32010 43~ 32OO4 32005 60~0 172 32006 31~14 321 5216 849 31~37 5884 31~95 200 600 1883 4727 4701 HOSEMAN HOUCHIN DDS, ROBERT J. HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M HOYT, RAYMOND HUgHES~ LASHONDAE I D BURR ICI DULUX PAINT CENTERS INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTIDN QROUP INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS, INC, INLAND CARPET CLEANINQ INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM INLAND MAILINC SERVICES, INC. INLAND MEDIATION BOARD INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY INT'L MUNICIPAL SIGNAL ASSOC. IRELAND SOUND SYSTEMS JOHANSEN, CARRIE JONES, KEITH JUST FOR KIDS KARATSU, ROBERT KECHOUR, DAVE KELLY EGUIPMENT KELLY PAPER COMPANY KELLY, KRISTY KELM~ JAMES KEMMER, JANICE KERN~ J.J. KILCOLLINS, DIANE KINO, PATRICK KLOMBIES, LIZ KOCH, CHARLES KONC, SOPHAK KOZLOVICH, DEBBIE KVILHAUC, LYNNE LAAPA LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. LAS ROSAS - EMMA SORCINI LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL DARLINCTON LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. LEE, MERIBEL LILBURN CORPORATION LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE LOOKING BACK LOS ANGELES TIMES LYNCH, JANIE M & N INTERNATIONAL, INC. MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. MARSHALL PLUMBINg MARSHALL~ SYLVIA MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MEMBERSHIP DUES RECREATION REFUND LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. SUBSCRIPTIONS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1~4 MEMBERSHIP DUES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION VEHICLE BUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES RECREATIDN RELEASE OF DEPOSIT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION RECREATION INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION RECREATION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION CENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETINC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL BUSINESS LICENSE SUBSCRIPTION RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REHAB. PRO~RAM RECREATION REFUND ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 145016 95.12 # 145017 2,663. 10 # 145018 205.74 145019 1,451.40 145020 243.00 145021 123.91 # 145022 1,040. 50 145023 455.57 145024 270.00 145025 507.00 145026 1,218.00 145027 240.48 145028 7.50 14502~ 141.96 145030 288.00 145031 46.35 14503~ 263.42 145033 30.00 145034 288.00 145035 1,948.94 14503& 25.00 145037 145038 372.43 145039 46.33 145040 15.00 145041 500.00 145042 105.00 145043 145044 15.00 145045 l&8.00 145046 21.57 145047 45.00 145048 480.00 # 14504~ 145050 120.00 145051 80.00 # 145052 ~,0~4.47 145053 262.50 145054 12.10 # 145055 232.78 14505~ 15.00 # 145057 5,740.00 145058 414.86 14505~ 1450&0 33.12 145061 24.18 145062 242.36 145063 - 145063 # 1450~4 54,311.31 # 1450~5 ~1~.20 145066 575.10 i i i t i i t t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 10-20-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/20/99 PA~E: 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. ~ CHECK# OVERLAP 5300 MAYER, COBLE & PALMER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145067 1,250.00 2555 MCALLISTER DESIGN DESIGN OF BUSINESS CARDS # 145068 1,077. 50 5148 MCCLINTON TRUCKINO CO,INC, ~.C. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145069 2,130.75 6032 MCGRUFF SAFE RIDS RECREATION REFUND 145070 1,325.72 1025 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145071 1,822.70 5852 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES 145072 59.98 6361 MIDWEST VENDING SECURITY RECREATION REFUND # 145073 304.84 3860 MOBILE MINI, INC. STORAGE SUPPLIES # 145074 261.84 32008 MOORE, LIZ RECREATION 145075 15.00 7183 MORALES, MELISSA REFUND PERS DEDUCTION 145076 100~00 32011 MORENO, EMILY RECREATION 145077 200.00 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 145078 433 NIXON-EGLI EGUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 145079 133.21 4853 OCLC, INC~ CORE SERVICES CHARGES 145080 79.92 ~4 145081 - 145081 523 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES # 145082 1,240.32 365 OLD ~UAKER PAINT COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145083 527 OLYMPIC STUDIOS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145084 2,053~ 13 232 OMNITRANS BUS PASSES 145085 704.00 3049 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES # 145086 3964 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145087 384.00 1224 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SERVICE, INC~ STRIPIN~ SERVICES 145088 235 OWEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 14508~ 5,631.30 6362 PACIFIC TRUCk E~UIPMENT RECREATION REFUND # 145090 6287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA RECREATION REFUND 145091 32001 PALM SPRIN~S HILTON MEEETIN~ 145092 127.73 32001 PALM SPRINGS HILTON MEEETING 145093 127.73 32001 PALM SPRINGS HILTON MEEETING 145094 255.46 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC~ CONCRETE SUPPLIES # 145095 123.35 6126 PARDUE PRODUCTIONS MOBILE D.d~ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 145096 300.00 5318 PARKER, SHANNON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145097 487 PATTON SALES CORP. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1450~8 1832 319~8 PCREATIONS BUSINE8~ LICENSE 1450~ 6.84 6205 PETERMAN LUMBER EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS KIT # 145100 4~7.~5 31999 PIMENTEL, IRENE RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 145101 1,000.00 6206 PLANNING C~NTER, THE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 14~102 28,448.90 693 POWER~TRIDE BATTERY CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145103 4401 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC~ E~UIPMENT RENTAL # 145104 96.46 5316 PRECISION GYMNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145105 7~3.75 31997 PROFESSIONAL MARKETIN~ AVENUES BUSINESS LICENSE 145106 21.35 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR # 145107 94.70 2176 GUADRANT SYSTEMS, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 145108 172.00 367~ ~UEBLO IMAGES RECREATION SUPPLIES 14510~ 78.60 251 R & R AUTOMOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 145110 490.09 1890 R & R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES 145111 726.60 5905 RAFFA, SUZIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145112 663.00 264 RALPHS ~ROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 145113 197.87 70 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER MEMBER8HIP MEETING # 145114 360.00 6380 RANCHO CUCAMON~A HIGH SCHOOL RECREATION REFUND # 145115 1,250.00 5513 RANDOM HOUSE, INC. LIBRARY SUPPLIES 145116 10.83 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS # 145117 171.98 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-20-95) (5)5)/00) RUN DATE: 10/20/':.)5) PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 11834 5105 5538 150 132 11838 1105 5634 1825) 4981 2507 351 1327 317 319 135 1432 5722 4176 4176 4445 836 11814 2718 4351 3333 4558 4788 4206 5601 4606 6398 5870 6235 213 4577 872 11835 11836 6175 509 6389 11837 6283 ROJAS, MONICA RUSH° CHRISTINE' SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS SAN BERN COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. SAN DIEGO RGTARY BROOM CO, INC SATURN OF LOMA LINDA SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. SENN, CINDY SHARED TECH. FAIRCHILD TELECOM, INC SHEPARD, CAROL ~. SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SIGN SHOP, THE SMART & FINAL SO CALIF EDISON CO. SO CALIF GAS COMPANY SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SPECTRA COMPANY STATE BOARD OF EGUALIZATION STATE BOARD OF EGUALIZATION T & G ROOFING TARGE~ SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TEAGARDEN, MARY TERRY, DONNA TOBIN, RENEE TODD, SYLVIA U S GUARDS CO., INC.~ UNDERGROUND SVC. ALERT OF SO. CALIF UNIGUE CREATIONS UNIGUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPLAND TENNIS CLUB VENTURA, LOUIS VLSYSTEMS, INC. WATSON PAINTING WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES WITTER, JOANNE WOLLAM, SCOTT WOODSIDE HOMES WRIGHT, LETICIA XEROX CORPORATION YORBA LINDA, CITY OF ZARUBA, BETTY ZOLEZIO, MICKEY *~ CHECK# OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND 145118 50.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENTS 145115) 185.13 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145120 61.63 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES 145121 60,850.00 MAINT SUPPLIES # 145122 585.0~ REIMBURSEMENT 145123 250.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 145124 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145125 347.40 TELEPHONE SERVICES # 145126 128,034.75 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145127 SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 145128 MAINT SUPPLIES 145129 142.23 DAY CAMP SUPPLIES # 145130 805.11 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 145131 8,~25. 58 MONTHLY GAS BILLS # 145132 1,479.22 REGISTRATION 145133 1,218.00 <<< 145134 - 145142 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS # 145143 12,628.60 LABOR AND SUPPLIES 145144 2°048.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 145145 608.36 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL # 145146 1,863.00 SERVICE & SUPPLIES 145147 300.00 MAINT SUPPLIES 145148 34.39 RECREATION REFUNDS 145149 20.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145150 153.00 RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT 145151 9.16 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145152 207.00 SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 145153 2,748.38 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 145154 212.75 1ST AID KITS 145155 119.87 MANAGEMENT SERVICES 145156 449.68 UPS SERVICE 145157 43.72 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145158 1,195.20 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 145159 121.80 COMPUTER HARDWARE # 145160 10,437.24 CAPPO MEETING 145161 <<~ 145162 - 145162 # 145163 4,105.21 # 145164 145165 42.00 145166 47.50 145167 210.00 145168 30.00 145169 144.00 145170 94.13 145171 17.00 145172 375.00 MAINT SUPPLIES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUND OVERPAYMENT ON FEES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT-OF-WAY ** TOTAL 881,751.44 State of California APPLICATION FOR ALCOItOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 211 (6/99) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control File Number: 358537 Receipt Number: 1250766 Geographical Code: 3615 Copies Mailed Date: September Issued Date: 14, 1999 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: RIVERSIDE $AMOUE SALIM F LA PALOMA MARKET '~. EIVED Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) 8847 ARCHIBALD AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO SEF 3 0 1999 City ol Rancho Cucamoog P~nning Division Type of license(s): 20 Transferor's license/name: 342548 / VALADEZ CARL? Dropping Partner: Yes No l.icense Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master Dup 20 OFF-SALE BEER ANt PERSON TO PERSONTRANSF NA Y 0 20 OFF-SALE BEER ANt ANNUAL FEE NA Y 0 Date 09/14/99 09/14/99 Total Fee $50.00 $34.00 $84.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the' Department pertaining to the Act? No Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a !icensec, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OP CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date: September 14, 1999 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant. or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicant corporation. named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true: (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensec with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) '' SAMOUE SALIM F ,'~7')c, '"'~'~"--' -?-: ............ )1853 L Por. West M.B. ~--~ --FERON I 16 115 I Site and Surrounding Zoning: ..I Site: q~ North: ~ South: 66.4-~ ~..~ass East: ~ West: ' ~c., Application: Applicant: Address: Description: Type 20 (Off Sale Beer and Wine) Salim F Samoue 8847 Archibald Avenue Existing business; transfer of license; new owner ~ 77~ ' I I I I I I i I ' ,, Low Residential Low Residential Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 17, Industrial Park Low Residential Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 17, Industrial Park MAP 804-36'2 PAR. NO. 8A Parcel Mop No. 15800, P.M. 166/51-52 // State of California ~,cpa.,..~-, .................. ~ ......... APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 21{ (6/99) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main Street Suite 900 Riverside, CA 92501 File Number: 358275 Receipt Number: 1249047 Geographical Code: 3615 Copies Mailed Date: Issued Date: DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) Type of license(s): 21 Transferor's license/name: RIVERSIDE K V MART CO TOP VALU MARKET 6351 HAVEN AVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SAN BERNARDINO Yes 1245 E WATSON CENTER RD CARSON, CA 90745 191021 /LUCKY STORES ' Dropping Partner: RECEIVED 8 0 Gi[y of Rancho Oucarnont~ F ~nnino Division Yes No !.icense Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF NA y 21 OFF-SALE GENERAL ANNUAL FEE NA Y 30 TEMPORARY RETAIl DUPLICATE NA N Date Fee 09/07/99 $1.274.00 09/07/99 $446.00 09/07/99 $100.00 Total $1.820.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No tlave you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? No Explain any 'Yes' answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall bc deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will havc all the qualifications of a licensec, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to bc violated any of fhc provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date: September 7, 1999 Under penalty of perjury. each person whose signature appears below. certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants. or an executive officer of the applicnnt corporation, named in the foregoing application. duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; {2) that he has read the foregoing ~nd knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein mndc arc true; (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has nny direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy Ihe payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding th~ day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gem or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure nny creditor of transferor: (5) that the transfer applicationmay be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensec with no resulting liability to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) KV MART CO (P-lg) See ^t~.ached 211-si§. THIS MAP IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF AD VALOREM TAXATION ONLY~ NOT TO SURVEYORS SCALE. S.I/2 Sec.25, T. IN J8~3 LOT H I 2 ~,~ /"",. II' I ' i IIGHLAND Application: Applicant: Address: Description: Type 21 (Off Sale General) K V Man Co 6351 Haven Avenue Existing business; transfer of license; new owner Site and Surrounding Zoning: Site: North: South: East: West: Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial Neighborhood Commercial I HWY. ' Par. F~rcel 'Mop No. 10972, P. A4. 125 / 21-24 Parcel Mop No. 9416, PM. 101/53-55 Par. Foothill Frostless Fruit Co. Sub. No. 2 M.B. 20/54 /3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: James T. Harris, Associate Engineer, Project Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $20,969 FROM FUND 24 - "ENGINEERING - STREET TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM" (A/C 24-4637-9825) TO COMPLETE THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT PROJECT NO. TR9817 TO PROVIDE A COLLISION DATABASE AND ANALYSIS SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council approve an appropriation of $20,969 from Fund 24 - "Engineering - Street Transportation Program" (a/c 24-4637-9825) to complete the Office of Traffic Safety Grant Project No. TR9817 to provide a Collision Database and Analysis System. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Early in t997, the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), requested grant proposals for traffic safety projects. Since the City's Traffic Management Section was using time intensive methods to track high collision locations, it was decided to request a high function database and collision analysis system. OTS approved the grant proposal in June, 1997 for $35,000; however, due to changes in federal funding laws, ISTEA was ending and TEA 21 was not yet approved, the project could not be started until July 1, 1998. At that time the project was added to the City's budget in Fund 24 - "Engineering - Street Transportation Program" (a/c 24-4637-9825) with the intent of finishing the work in FY 1998/99. Due to delays in acqt, iring the printers and plotter ($10,000 max) necessary to fully utilize the system and the acquisition of additional grant timds ($10,969) to add the Police Department to the system and give them citation database capability, the project must be completed in FY 1999/2000. It is now necessary to appropriate those timds. These systems have already allowed the Traffic Management Section to better direct efforts such as construction of new or modified traffic signals, installation of stop signs and other traffic safety related projects such as construction of the Route 30/210 freeway. R s~full~mi~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH /q ('ITY ()1: RANCHO CI (~'.,'\N,I()N(L.'\ STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager · Rick Gomez, AICP, Community Development Director Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $70,000 FROM FUND 20 (PARK DEVELOPMENT RESERVE) FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON THE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT RECOMMENDATION That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approve an appropriation of $ 70,000 from Fund 20 Reserve for additional work to be accomplished on the Central Park Project; approve an increase to the contract with Adler Public Affairs for additional public relations work, including preparation of materials for the community education process, in the amount of $55,000, and approve the award of a contract to RJM Design Group, in the amount of $15,000, for the continuation of their services on the Central Park Design Project for work which will assist in the community education process. BACKGROUND Although the City is prohibited from advocating for or against a ballot measure as a matter of law, it is permitted to educate the public about the issue, as long as that education effort steers clear of advocacy for or against the measure. The city is entitled to expend city funds to educate the public about the Central Park plan, as well as its proposed funding mechanism. In January of 1999, the City hired Adler Public Affairs to provide marketing services for the Central Park project. Although not identified in their original proposal,. it has become evident that the City desires their services to perform additional work for the community education process. This work will include: A Question/Answer Fact Sheet for $5,000, which would be completed by early December, and would communicate in a very straight-forward manner the history of Central Park, details about the proposed Central Park Plan and how the park would be funded. A Video for $20,000, which would be completed by early December and would cover the general information regarding the proposed amenities for Central Park, as well as how the park would be funded, for use on the city's cable television system or as a visual aid for city officials making presentations on the city's behalf. An 11 "x 17" 4 Page Brochure for $15,000, which would be completed by early December, and would explain the issue and include color renderings of the park facilities proposed. A Telephone Survey for $15,000, which would be completed by mid-January, and would assess the City resident's awareness of the Central Park issue and attitudes. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION OF TIlE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT November 3, 1999 Page 2 RJM Design Group, has a long standing history working with the city on the Central Park Design Project, having previously prepared the Central Park Master Plan and related documents, the Central Park Design Development Drawings and related documents, as well as any graphic information that has been required throughout the years to assist the City with the project. Thus, staff is requesting to continue working with RJM Design Group for additional graphic materials that are currently needed for the public education process. ReCP~ully submitted, Rick Gomez Community Development Director RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES S Repo TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II DATE: November 3, 1999 APPROVAL OF REQUEST FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S ATHLETIC FEDERATION FOR CITY TO CO-SPONSOR CALIFORNIA POLICE AND FIRE GAMES 2000 TO BE HELD AT SELECTED VENUES IN THE INLAND EMPIRE INCLUDING BERYL PARK, RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER AND SPORTS COMPLEX, ON JUNE 26- JULY 1, 2000, AND TO WAIVE ASSOCIATED FEES AND CHARGES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the request for co-sponsorship of the San Bernardino County Sheriff Athletic Federation's California Police and Fire Games 2000 to be held at selected venues in the Inland Empire including Beryl Park, Red Hill Community Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Sports Complex on June 26-July 1, 2000 and to waive associated fees and charges. BACKGROUND The City has received a request from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Athletic Federation for co-sponsorship of the California Police and Fire Games 2000, to be held at selected venues in the Inland Empire including Beryl Park, Red Hill Community Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Sports Complex on June 26-July 1, 2000, and to waive associated fees and charges. The Games, formerly called the California Police Olympics Summer Games, started in San Diego in 1967 with participation of 504 athletes. Next year the Games, with the addition of firefighters, are expected to draw 8,000-10,000 athletes competing in sixty /7 CITY COUNCIL Co-Sponsorship San Bernardino County Sheriff Athletic Federation Police and Fire Games 2000 November 3, 1999 Page 2 different sporting events throughout the County of San Bernardino. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been asked to provide sports fields for soccer, softball and flag football events. As a fundraising event, all net proceeds generated from the Games will go to their department by providing fitness equipment to the different stations throughout the County, as well as providing financial support to a number of charities throughout San Bernardino County, including the Special Olympics, the Loma Linda Children's Cancer Ward and the County Drug and Gang Task Force. The request from the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Athletic Federation for co- sponsorship of the Police and Fire Games 2000 and waiving associated fees and charges for the event has been reviewed by staff in relation to Resolution Number 99- 049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter. In staffs opinion the event has been determined to meet the criteria set forth in the Resolution, therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for co-sponsorship, waive associated fees and charges and direct staff to work with the applicant to ensure a successful outcome to the event. FISCAL IMPACT Should the City Council wish to approve the co-sponsorship of this event and the full waiver of fees and charges associated with this activity, this action would amount to a total support of approximately $13,000. A refundable damage security deposit would generally not be required for a co-sponsored activity; however, the Federation would be required to provide comprehensive public liability insurance in the amount of two million dollars. Respe Ui~Kevin,McArdle Community Services Director h[COMMSERV~CITYCOUNtstaffreports~firepolicegame200011.3.99.doc GAMES 2000 August 03. 1999 Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Jack. As you know the San Bernardino County SheriIFs Athletic Federation will be hosting the California Police and Fire Games 2000. This event will rank as the largest "pure" amateur sporting event to held in the State of California. Also, a significant number of the events will be held the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is estimated that Games will bring in approximately $6,000,000 in revenue to the local economy as result of hotel accommodations, food and beverage, entertainment, and shopping. A significant portion of this will be seen by businesses in the CiW of Rancho Cucamonga. The San Bernardino SherifFs Athletic Federation will be funding the bill of the entire event including the rental of thirty-eight separate facilities as well as insurance and equipment. As you can see based on these numbers and required expenditures this event will be quite costly. It is for this reason and also considering that we are a non-profit organization we respectfully ask if the City of Rancho Cucamonga would please waive the costs for use of the required facilities within your ci .ty. Our organization would be willing to trade a sponsorship for whatever these costs would normally be. I have provided a copy of our sponsorship kit which breaks down the different sponsorship levels as well as a more detailed explanation of what the Games are all about. Also included is more information on the history of the SheriIFs Athletic Federation. Sincerely, , ~, William Hunt, Sheriff's Sergeant Executive Director 8300 Utica Suite 175, Rancho Cucamonga, California 9i730 909/483-2838 fax 909/483-1039 RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY SERVICES S Repo TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director BY: Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II DATE: November 3, 1999 APPROVAL OF A REQUEST FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT'S WEST VALLEY SEARCH AND RESCUE TEAM FOR CITY TO CO-SPONSOR ANNUAL FUN RUN AND SAFETY FAIR ON APRIL 29, 2000, AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA EPICENTER AND TO WAIVE ASSOCIATED FEES AND CHARGES RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council approve the request for co-sponsorship of the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's West Valley Search and Rescue Team for their annual Fun Run and Safety Fair on April 29, 2000, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and to waive associated fees and charges. BACKGROUND The City has received a request from the San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's West Valley Search and Rescue Team for co-sponsorship of their Fun Run and Safety Fair planned for April 29, 2000, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and to waive associated fees and charges. The San Bernardino County Sheriff West Valley Search and Rescue Team is a non- profit volunteer organization dedicated to assisting local communities in the search and rescue of lost/overdue hikers, rescuing victims of accidents, avalanches, downed aircraft and vehicular accidents in our local mountains. As a non-profit organization, the team receives no financial support from the County. The Team is funded solely from private contributions and fundraisers. One of primary fund raisers of the organization is their annual Fun Run and Safety Fair. Traditionally, this event has been held at Chaffey CITY COUNCIL Co-sponsorship West Valley Seamh and Rescue Fun Run and Safety Fair November 3,1999 Page 2 College. The Team would like to move their event this year to the Epicenter in order to increase participation in the activity. The request from the Search and Rescue Team for co-sponsorship of their fun run and safety fair and waiving associated fees and charges for the event has been reviewed by staff in relation to Resolution Number 99-049, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Adopting Facility Rental Fee Waiver and City Service Charge Waiver Policies for the Epicenter. In staffs opinion the event has been determined to meet the criteria set forth in the Resolution, therefore, staff recommends that the City Council approve the request for co-sponsorship, waive associated fees and charges and direct staff to work with the applicant to ensure a successful outcome to the event. FISCAL IMPACT Should the City Council wish to approve the co-sponsorship of this event and the full waiver of fees and charges associated with this activity, this action would amount to a total support of approximately $4,000.00. A refundable damage security deposit and comprehensive public liability insurance coverage in the amount of two million dollars would be required. Resp. ec/l~ully s~bmitt~d,,,~ Kevin. McArdle Community Services Director Attachment I:~COMMSERV~ClTYCOUN~staffreportsL~earchrescue 11.3. 99. doc West Vailey_ arch & Rescue PMB ~75 · 8780 19th Street~ · Alta Loma, CA 91701 Mayor William Alexander City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 9/2O/99 Dear Mayor Alexander, The San Bernardino County Sheriff's West Valley Search and Rescue Team is a non profit 100% volunteer organization dedicated to providing the best possible service to the members of our community. We perform wilderness searches for lost hikers and rescues for those injured. While our area of service is quite large, we primarily service the local mountains by searching for lost and overdue hikers and rescuing victims of hiking or climbing accidents, avalanches, downed aircraft, and vehicular accidents on the mountain. We also respond to body recoveries, urban searches, and have assisted local fire and police departments. We currently have 36 members who spent over 15,000 hours last year on Search and Rescue related causes. While we are officially part of the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, we work and train independently from them and receive no financial support from the county. All team members train on their own time and purchase all of their own equipment. The life saving services provided by team members are priceless and done so without any compensation. The West Valley Search and Rescue Team is a Federal 501(C)(3) non-profit organization funded solely from private contributions and fundraisers. We will once again be holding our annual 5/10K run and 5K walk fund raiser along with our safety fair on April 29, 2000. We would like to move our event to the Epicenter and have met with Paula Pachon and the Epicenter planning committee. I would like to request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga waive all associated costs and fees for our event. As a non-profit organization funds are at a premium and we could not afford to have our event at the Epicenter otherwise. If you have any questions regarding our event or our team please feel free to call me at (909) 980-4746. Thank you, Rick Fontana, Fundraising Coordinator West Valley Search and Rescue A uolunteer organization dedicated to sauing liues through rescue ancl mountain safety education T H E CITY 0 F FROM: BY: DATI~ Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Director Jan Reynolds Redevelopment Analyst November 3, 1999 APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS AND TO CANCEL PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER TERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 AND IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF THE DISTRICT. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution abandoning further proceedings to terminate Community Facilities District 91-1 and related Improvement Area No. 1 of the District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: On September 15, 1999, the City Council approved Resolutions 99-209 and 99-210 authorizing the initiation of proceedings to terminate Community Facilities District 91-1 and Improvement Area 1 of the District, and setting the public hearing for November 3, 1999. At that time, a majority of the affected property owners indicated that the financing method proposed by the Community Facilities District was no longer desirable or feasible. Within the past two weeks, Redevelopment Agency staff has received comment from new property owners that additional time is needed to further study the improvements and financing mechanism approved for CFD 91-1 and the Improvement Area. To accommodate the property owners in this request, Special Counsel for the District recommended that the City Council terminate the proceedings at this time. Approval of the attached Resolution does not waive the City Council's right to reconsider termination of the District on a later date. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Director RESOLUTION NO. 99- ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TO ABANDON PROCEEDINGS AND TO CANCEL PUBLIC HEARINGS TO CONSIDER THE TERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT AS A WHOLE AND WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF SUCH DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, previously formed COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) (the "District") and IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 of the District ("Improvement Area No. 1") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Government Code Section 53311 and following) (the "Act") for the purpose of financing the construction and acquisition of certain public facilities as described in that certain document entitled "Community Facilities District Report for Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) City of Rancho Cucamonga" approved by the City Council on December 4, 1991 (the "Facilities") and the incidental expenses to be incurred in financing the Facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council did previously adopt Resolution Nos. 99-209 and 99-210 to declare the intention of the City Council to consider the termination of the authorization to levy special taxes with the District and Improvement Area No. 1 and id set November 3, 1999 at the date for public hearings to consider such termination; and WHEREAS, the Act authorizes the City Council to commence proceedings to consider changes and modifications within the District and Improvement Area No. 1 at any time; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that consideration of the termination of the authority to levy special taxes within the District and Improvement Area No. 1 is premature at this time and, therefore, the City Council desires to abandon such proceedings at this time and to cancel the public hearings scheduled for November 3, 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND DETERMINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 91-1 (Victoria Community) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2. Abandonment of Proceedings. This City Council hereby abandons the proceedings, including the cancellation of the public hearings scheduled to be held on November 3, 1999, to consider the termination of the authorization to levy special taxes within the District and within Improvement Area No. 1. The abandonment of these proceedings does not constitute a waiver of any right which the City Council may have to consider such proceedings at such time in the future as the City Council shall deem appropriate. SECTION 3. Effective Date of Resolution. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Laura J. Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM FOR THE METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT, AND THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTMTIES PROGRAM FOR THE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR THE 210 FOOTI-[ILL FREEWAY EXTENSION WITHIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached Resolutions approving applications for grant funds from the Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program and the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) Program, for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station Beautification Project, and for TEA funding for the Landscape Enhancement and Improvement Project for the 210 Foothill Freeway Extension within Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANA LYSIS Applications for the 2000-2001 TEA and EEM cycles are being considered by San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG),CalTrans and the State Resources Agency. Both the TEA and the EEM funds are reimbursable programs, with the TEA requiring matching funds. Funding for the Metrolink Project is being sought from both grants, while the 210 Freeway Landscaping Project is looking to the TEA grant as its primary source of funds. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LB :dlw k.._Attachments VICINITY MAP ......................... ~; ~ .................. .s~.;...~.......... . ~ ~ ........ ... .......... ........ ................... .......... :.: ......... :..... · · · · .................:.:...:.:..:...: ..........: ...... : ................... :. · .-..:... · __ .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ..... ................. : .......... . .......... . ..... ......... ....... :.:.:.: .....: ...... . ..... . ........ . ................ . .............. .. ·., ....... ............. ........... -.............. ............. ... .............. ........,.......... ........... :.'.:..... ...... .-...: ........... . ............ :..:...:.. · I,,I-,-, I .................... ......... ..........,......... · ~-.........-............. ,: .....F ¢'.'.'. ~ ~ ..... ':':':':' ':'. ...................,.a ~l'.'-' '-'.'.'.'.'.'.'"'" ';" · I'"' ' ~ ! '------1 c~,- I .......· ......'.'.-.--.'.'.'.-.'.' ~*-.'.'.'.-.'.'.-.'.'.'.'. · ..I-.'... · / .....................................'~I'.'.'..:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:........~I:.:..... H~<~ ' ':':':':':':':':':':'""'"' I'""'"", ! Landscape Enhancement and Improvement :::::::, '.'::::::-'::?.':::'::::~..,.,z,t, Beautification Project .-- d/~" ! 0 -- @ 0 0 0 ~k CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPT: Replace lhe weeded, undevelopable lot adjacent to lhe stafion's norlh plalform wilh a cullurally rich backdrop .of the region's agricultural and nalural landscape horilage. The landscaping will add a finished edge to the slation thai screens industrial views while also providing a needed windbreak for slation users and a sense of community gateway. Communihr4hemed ad (nol funded by granl monies) and pedestrian amenities will provide further enrichment to make lh0 slation a rewarding landmark for bolh active and passive users. EUCALYPTUS WINDROW/SCREEN VINEYARD OLIVE GROVE COMBINATION STONE WALL/FENCE CALIFORNIA NATIVE LANDSCAPE AREA WITH CALIFORNIA SYCAMORES, CANARY ISLAND PINES AND A DRY STREAM ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN AREAS TO COMPLEMENT SOUTH PLATFORM COMMUNITY.THEME ART WORKS (NOT FUNDED BY GRANT) I ! I .t AND PHASE 1 PARKING e/----PHASE 2 PARKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY SAN BAG IN 1999/ I SPUR LINES UNDEVELOPED LAND PROJECT BOUNDARY FENCING GRAVEL MAINTENANCE PATHWAYS MILLIKEN UNDERPASS LANDSCAPIt,,I , (ADJACENT TRANSPORTATION PRO J-"~ ) Ill,1!l{ ?m ~ I 210 Freeway Landscaping Concept (nts) RESOLUTION NO. qq"~,~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21s~' CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1997, which re-authorized funding for the Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program, initiated by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), which is intended to provide federal dollars over a six-year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for transportation enhancement activities; and WHEREAS, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), being the Regional Transportation Planning Agency having discretion over allocation of funds has initiated a call for transportation enhancement-type projects; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals and will assist SANBAG staff in reviewing projects for eligibility; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by SANBAG and Caltrans require a resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with SANBAG to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Approves the filing of an application for grant assistance from the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program for the beautification of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Metrolink Railway Station. SECTION2: Supports the Metrolink Railway Station Beautification Project. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution. RESOLUTION NO. q q - ~ .~ ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21sT CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE 210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY EXTENSION IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the United States Congress enacted the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1997, which re-authorized funding for the Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Program, initiated by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA), which is intended to provide federal dollars over a six-year period as matching funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for transportation enhancement activities; and WHEREAS, San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), being the Regional Transportation Planning Agency having discretion over allocation of funds has initiated a call for transportation enhancement-type projects; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals and will assist SANBAG staff in reviewing projects for eligibility; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by SANBAG and Caltrans require a resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with SANBAG to carry out the transportation enhancement activities project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Approves the filing of an application for grant assistance from the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program for the Landscape Enhancement of the Foothill Freeway Extension in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION2: Supports the Metrolink Railway Station Beautification Project. SECTION 3: The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this resolution. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted AB471 (Chapter 106 of the Statutes of 1989), which is intended to provide $10 million annually for a period of 10 years for grant funds to local, state and federal agencies and nonprofit entities for projects to enhance and mitigate the environmental impacts of modified or new public transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, the Resources Agency has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing grant proposals and is required to submit to the California Transportation Commission a list of recommended projects from which the grant recipients will be selected; and WHEREAS, said procedures and criteria established by the Resources Agency requires a resolution certifying the approval of application by the applicant's governing body before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the application contains assurances that the applicant must comply with; and WHEREAS, the applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the environmental enhancement and mitigation project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: Approves the filing of an application for the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for grant assistance. Certifies that said applicant will make adequate provisions for operation and maintenance of the project. Appoints William Joseph O'Neil, City Engineer, as agent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam, City Manager BY: Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst SUBJECT: Professional Consultint, At'reement for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council appropriate funds in the amount of $48,000 to Account No. 01-4285-6028 and approve and execute a Professional Consulting Agreement with David Turch and Associates (DTA) of Washington D.C. to represent, advise and provide the City of Rancho Cucamonga legislative advocacy services regarding the Legislative and Executive Branches of the Federal Government. Background: Currently, the City of Rancho Cucamonga utilizes a legislative advocate to provide services in legislative advocacy and governmental affairs in matters that impact Rancho Cucamonga at the state level. These services include the review and analysis of current and proposed California legislation, and advocacy on behalf of Rancho Cucamonga to secure potential state funding available to Califomia cities. To ensure Rancho Cucamonga's interest are advanced at all governmental levels, the City has sought the services of a federal legislative advocate to act on behalf of the City. Assistance with members of Congress, Congressional Committees and staff, the Executive Branch and other federal officials would be of benefit to Rancho Cucamonga's interests as well as the securing of additional federal funding. In this capacity, Rancho Cucamonga will be notified and advised of federal legislation, reports, hearing testimony and relevant regulatory activities impacting Rancho Cucamonga, and will be provided a federal legislative action agenda to be used as the basis for all federal funding requests. Federal Lobbyist, David Turch and Associates has been identified by the City as a candidate to represent Rancho Cucamonga and its needs at the federal level. The cost of these services will be approximately $48,000 per year. /tted, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, AICP, Community Development Director Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner APPROVAL TO AWARD A CONTRACT TO RJM DESIGN GROUP IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 20 (PARK DEVELOPMENT) FOR ADDITIONAL WORK ON THE CENTRAL PARK PROJECT RECOMMENDATION That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approve the award of a contract to RJM Design Group, in the amount orS15,000 to be funded from the park development account for the continuation of their services on the Central Park Design Project for work which will assist in the community education process. BACKGROUND RIM Design Group, has a long standing history working with the city on the Central Park Design Project, having previously prepared the Central Park Master Plan and related documents, the Central Park Design Development Drawings and related documents, as well as any graphic information that has been required throughout the years to assist the City with the project. ~p_ec y~d, ~R ~:k '~~'~~'~ ............. -~i C~mmmIity Develop}nent Director CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jon A. Gillespie, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOLMES AND NARVER INC., TO PROVIDE PROJECT STUDY REPORT SERVICES FOR FUTURE INTERCHANGE AND SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS AT BASE LINE ROAD AND 1-15 FREEWAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $79,150, AND AUTHORIZATION OF 10% CONTINGENCY TO BE 'FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 22-4637-9922. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve award and execute the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes and Narver, Inc. to provide Project Study Report Services for future interchange and signal modifications at Base Line Road and 1-15 Freeway in the amount of $79,150, and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded from Account No. 22-4637-9922. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Cities of Fontana and Rancho Cucamonga are currently experiencing a lot of new development in the vicinity of Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway. The City of Fontana is currently constructing traffic signals and widening the northbound on/off ramps at Base Line Road and the I-15 Freeway. City staff anticipates that the widening and signalizing of Base Line Road and the southbound I-I 5 Freeway on/offramps will be needed in the near future. The preparation of a project study report is the first step in the process required by Caltrans before any improvements can be constructed on a State owned facility. The improvement of the Base Line Road at I-15 Freeway interchange is included in the City's Transportation Development Fee Program. City staff sent out requests for proposals to six qualified engineering consultants. After carefully reviewing the Consultant's proposals, staff recommends Holmes and Narver, Inc., as the most qualified and responsible firm. The Professional Services Agreement has been reviewed by and is acceptable to the City Attorney. Respectful?..~c~ubmitted, William JTO'Neil City Engineer WJO:JAG:dlw Attachments CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HIGHLAND AVE. PARK LN BASE LINE ROAD II z c3 tJ ~ II ~J ~ II I.I ,- II ~ II SP. RR (SR30) HIGHLAND AVE. > z · ~ VICTORIA ST. I I ,~' F lOTHILL BLVD. I AVE ~ject Location Vicinity Map J7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. o2qeil, City Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE CITY TO ACQUIRE AN OFF- SITE EASEMENT, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15711, LOCATED NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY RC HOMES, LLC - FOOTHILL MEADOWS RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving an Acquisition Agreement, Security, and Deposit, also authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Developer is required to install portions of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan of Storm Drains with this tract. A portion of the required storm drain improvements is located on property owned by neither the developer nor the City. The Developer has made a good faith effort to acquire an easement for installation of the improvements, but has been unable to do so. The City is authorized by State law to acquire by eminent domain that property necessary for storm drain improvement purposes. The Developer has signed the agreement and submitted the appropriate deposit and security for the acquisition. This agreement allocates costs and responsibilities towards obtaining said properties. The agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and is available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. 02qeil City Engineer WJO:BAM:sd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING D .I~'SION . ARROW I I~lll Ill~ll .I 'NORTH NTS ITEM: Tract 15711 TITLE: Acquisition Agreement EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map RESOLUTION NO. ~ q'-,~ o~ ~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15711, FROM RC HOMES, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, the Developer, RC Homes, LLC, has submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga tract and improvement plans for review as conditioned by Tentative Tract 15711, located north of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, south of the 1-15 Freeway and west of East Avenue, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, for the Developer to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to recording of the final map of said development said Developer has offered the Acquisition Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient security and deposit. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: That said Acquisition Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Acquisition Agreement on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Acquisition Agreement is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. qO CITY OF RANCHO CLrCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-15, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITrED BY CATELLUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving DR 99-15, accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 99-15, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard, in Subarea 8 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 26, 1999, for the development of two industrial warehouse buildings on 43.56 acres. The Developer, Catellus Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvemenu in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond: $1,850,000 $ 925,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respectively submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BAM:sd Attachments P A F~C~I=L. 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION A NORTH 1"= 400' ITEM: DR 99-15 TITLE: Improvement Agreement EXI-IIBIT: ViciniV/Map SOUUTIO q'7- d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-15 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement by Catellus Development Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Milliken Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property referred to as DR 99-15; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda Beek, Jr. Engineerj~ APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS FOR TRACT 14379, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CENTEX HOMES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extensions and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14379 were approved by the City Council on November 18, 1998. The developer, Centex Homes, is requesting approval of a 12omonth extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extensions are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department TRACT MAP 14379 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE PROJECT SITE NORTH RESOLUTION NO. ~ q- c~ ~_.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14379 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on November 18, 1998, by Centex Homes, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14379; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer,~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSIONS FOR TRACT 14459, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND LEMON AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY ALTA LOMA ONE AND TWO, A JOINT VENTURE RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extensions and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14459 were approved by the City Council on April I, 1998. The developer, Alta Loma One and Two, a Joint Venture, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extensions are available in the City Clerk,s office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachments City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department TRACT MAP 14459 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND LEMON AVENUES NORTH RESOLUTION NO. qq~ ~ 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14459 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 8, 1998, by Alta Loma One and Two, a Joint Venture, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14459; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15155, SUBMITTED BY MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BLVD. AND WHITE OAK AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Parcel Map 15155, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Parcel Map 15155, located on the northwest corner of Jersey Blvd. and White Oak Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond and accept the Maintenance Bond. Developer: MASTER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 3991 MAC ARTHUR BOULEVARD, SUITE 215 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 441231S $175,000.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond 441231S $ 17,500.00 Respectfully submitted, Will,am J. 0'~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department PARCEL MAP 15155 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AND WHITE OAK AVENUE Sl TE ' -__.-..:~ ARROW ROUTE: JERSEY BLVD. METROUNK IIIIIIII IllIll IIIIllll IIIII1! VICINITY N,T.S. MAP fi NORTH so[u, os so. qq-RdS' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15155 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 15155, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and complete. WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CIJCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: November 3, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) -APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the adoption of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01. BACKGROUND In 1991, the Planning Commission and City Council conducted public hearings on a City-initiated request to reduce the Medium Residential acreage in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to address issues of increased traffic, demands on City services, overcrowding in schools, and a change of the community's rural character. The City adopted an ordinance which reduced the Medium Residential acreage in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to those limited areas shown on the current land use map. The proposed project is a request to amend the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan land use maps to "exchange" land use designations between two equally sized, vacant properties. A Medium Residential designation on a 20-acre site adjoining the freeway is proposed to be shifted to a 20-acre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. The Low-Medium Residential CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 99-04 & ESPA 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY November 3, 1999 Page 2 designation on the 20-acre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor is proposed to be shifted to the 20-acre site adjoining the freeway. No development is proposed at this time. The Planning Commission held duly advertised public hearings on the subject applications on September 22 and September 29, 1999. The Planning Commission determined the higher land use intensity (Medium Residential) is appropriate adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. The Commission further noted that the property configurations provide better opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed medium density project than the linear site abutting the freeway. Secondly, the Commission determined the proposed Low-Medium designation in the site abutting the freeway is consistent and compatible with the other Low-Medium districts, also abutting Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Area. A Low-Medium neighborhood street circulation system and lot layout for this site was shown in the Master Plan for the 80-acre site south of this project (Tentative Tract 15711 ). The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 (see attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 22,1999; Adopted Resolution 99-89 and 99-90; and associated meeting minutes.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The Planning Commission finds that there will not be any significant environmental impacts resulting from the requested land use change and recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. City Planner BB:RVB\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report, dated September 22, 1999 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Draft Minutes, dated September 29, 1999 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Resolutions 99-89 and 99-90 Exhibit "D" - Resolution Approving GPA 99-04 Exhibit "E" - Ordinance Adopting ESPA 99-01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: September 22, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. BACKGROUND: In 1991, the Planning Commission and City Council conducted public hearings on a City-initiated request to reduce the Medium Residential acreage in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to address issues of increased traffic, demands on City services, overcrowding in schools, and a change of the community's rural character (Exhibit "C"). The City adopted an ordinance which reduced the Medium Residential acreage in the Etiwanda Specific Plan to those limited areas shown on the current land use map. The two sites in this application were involved in the 1991 hearings. In and around the northerly site, "Area 1 ," the Medium designation was reduced from approximately 30 acres to 20 acres. The southerly site, "Area 2," was part of a larger, 90-acre area, redesignated from Medium to Low-Medium, to accomplish an overall reduction in residential density in the area. In March of 1999, Joseph Oleson, representing Overland Company, presented alternate land use concepts for Eftwanda, south of Interstate 15, to the Planning Commission at a Pre-Application PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-04 AND ESPA 99-01 September 22, 1999 Page 2 workshop. Land use concepts included rearranging future park, office, single family, and multi- family locations. The Commissioners commented on potential compatibility, master planning, and environmental issues associated with the shifting of land uses. In light of the discussion, the applicant has chosen to file General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan amendment applications for the shifting of Medium and Low-Medium designations on two defined areas only. The applications do not involve shifting of the future park or office uses in Etiwanda. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Density: The General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan currently designate Area 1 as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan or estimated population. Surroundin.q Land North: Area 1 - Area 2 - South: Area 1 ~ Area 2 - East: Area 1 - Area 2 - West: Area 1 Area 2 Use and Zoning: Interstate 15 Freeway, Medium District Vacant land, Low-Medium District Vacant land, Low-Medium District Residence, retail, and vacant land, General Commercial District Vacant land, East Avenue, City of Fontana Vacant land, Low-Medium District - Interstate 15 freeway - Vacant land, residence, Low Medium District General Plan Designations: Project Site - Area 1 - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) Area 2 - Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) North: Area 1 - Interstate 15 Freeway Area 2 - Low-Medium Residential South: Area 1 - Low-Medium Residential Area 2 - Commercial East: Area 1 - City of Fontana Area 2 - Low-Medium Residential West: Area 1 - Interstate 15 freeway Area 2 - Low-Medium Residential Site Characteristics: Area 1 is a linear configuration bordered on the northwest by the Interstate 15 Freeway. To the south, the site is bounded by residential land. To the east, the site is bounded by vacant land in the City of Fontana. Area 2 is bounded by vacant land to the north and east. To the west, the site is bounded by residences and vacant land. To the south, the site is bounded by a residence and vacant land and a residence, within the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. Both sites contain approximately 20 acres and are undeveloped. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-01 AND ESPA 99-04 September 22, 1999 Page 3 ANALYSIS: General: The proposed project is a request to amend the General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan land use maps. The project reflects an "exchange" of land use designations between two equally sized, vacant properties. A Medium Residential designation on a 20-acre site adjoining the freeway is proposed to be shifted to a 20-acre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. The Low-Medium Residential designation on the 20oacre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor is proposed to be shifted to the 20-acre site adjoining the freeway. No development is proposed at this time. Appropriateness of Existing Residential Designations: In Area 1, the existing Medium designation along the freeway reflects the general policy of placing higher intensity land uses along the major traffic corridors where extensive buffering, noise mitigation and access controls are necessary. Medium designation flanks a portion of the freeway while the remainder of the land between the freeway and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is predominately Low-Medium Residential. In Area 2, the existing Low-Medium Residential designation provides continuity with the larger area designated Low-Medium between Etiwanda and East Avenues, south of Miller. Appropriateness of Proposed Residential Designations: Higher land use intensities are appropriate adjoining a freeway to allow clustering of units and mitigation of noise by site design. Higher land use intensities are also appropriate adjoining commercial corridors to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Both areas in this application are shown in the "Relative Land Use Intensities" figure in the Etiwanda Specific Plan as appropriate sites for higher land use intensities (Exhibit "D") because of the proximity to traffic and commercial corridors, respectively. On a practical matter, the two areas differ in terms of how synchronized the land use boundaries are with legal lot lines. The existing Medium designation in Area 1 does not coincide with existing property lines. Some lots have split-zoning with Low-Medium in the front and Medium in the rear. Two lots are without frontage on East Avenue, the primary point of access for a multi-family project. In contrast, the proposed Medium designation in Area 2 is consistent with property lines and contains ample frontage along Eftwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. Staff feels the property configurations in Area 2 provide better opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. The proposed Low-Medium designation in Area 1 is consistent with the other Low-Medium districts, also abutting Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Area. The proposed Low- Medium designation was shown in the master plan for Tentative Tract 15711, south of Area 1. Staff feels the proposed land use designations are consistent with land use arrangements and land use compa,tibilities in the City. Environmental Assessment: Parts I and II of the Initial Study have been completed. Staff has determined that no significant impacts would result from shifting the Medium and Low- Medium land use designations for the two sites. Environmental issues will need to be analyzed when formal development proposals are applied for in the future. When specific PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 September 22, 1999 Page 4 development projects are proposed, existing environmental review requirements will be initiated to ensure adequate analysis of impacts. Any impacts noted will be mitigated through the City's development review process. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council for General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 by the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:RVB\Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Resolution Resolution Proposed Land Use Amendment - Adopted Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map 1991 Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment Issue Areas Etiwanda Specific Plan "Relative Land Use Intensities" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II - Recommendation of Approval for GPA 99-04 - Recommendation of Approval for ESPA 99-01 CITY CITY RANCHO .FT__~ ---,. '[] ..... CUCAMONGA ~ ~11~- V' .....~-, EXISTING LM 7~~' /,~ /Y ~, ~ ~ ~ I L~ ~C*L~: ~ 1'= 700' T GC 3.0 ac~$ CITY UMITS ZONE BOUNDARY LINE _,~;b;~ ~ A SITE PLAN _E.T. IWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN El:{ Estate Residential 0-1 DU'S/AC VL very ~v 1-2 DU'S/AC L Low 2-4 DU*S/AC LM Low Medium 4-8 DI.rS/AC M Medk~n 8-14 D~FS/AC MASTER PLAN REQUIRED ~:,-LH Schools EXISTING P~OPOSED !OFFICIAL 'LAND USE MAP GC Gener'a Corm1. FC Freeway Comm. CS Community Service p/r ,:~ Parks (ExISTING/PfiOP~SE~) OS open space figure 5-1 ':':':':':':':' ETIWANDA SOUTH OVERLAY DISTRICT Ex~,;b;+ "%" REVISED 8'7/96 VICTORIA TR£ T 1 L I I ee Eliwanda Specific Plan Amendments 91-03 '~:} ! Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan a Amendments 91-02 ~ LM : LM ~ , - District Design&tion -~-'~' / " I~ PROPERTIES CURRENTLY ........ ~ // DESiI;NATED ~EDIU~ / norther~nortion RESIDENTIAL (8-1~ DIELLIN~ I - · , UNITS PER ACRE) UNDER ~ ~ ~ CONSIDERATION ~OR REDESIGNATION i~ .:,~ ~ TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL ~ ,~ (4-8 DIECLING UNIT~ PER ACRE) OP ~ -~ LM ' ~ .~ ~A~ : I-ESPA Subare. Nos ~ V .~' ~ ~ ' ,' ,~ -souther, portion ..,,o.., ,~,a,.,.c~./.: .......: .~~~' ~~,. .................................. Z...;= ....: :~-~g" ]~M:ESPA 91-03. FSPA 91-02 OF N.A..\'CHO CUCA-'VIONGA P~\'.~TN© Di~.'~$ION TFFLE:sp,cmc Plan Amend. Location Map -- C PARK ~ - · Intensities ~ Higher, rtitle RELATIVE LAND USE INTENSITIES figure' 4-2 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: General Plan Amendment 99-04 & Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 2. Related Files: Description of Project: A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue, from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Overland Company, c/o Joseph Oleson 48891 Noline, Palm Desert, CA 92260. 5. General Plan Designation: Medium Residential and Low-Medium Residential. 6. Zoning: Medium Residential and Low-Medium Residential in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The first site area between the Interstate 15 Freeway and East Avenue is bounded by the freeway along its entire northwestern property line. To the north, there is a water district facility, a triangular parcel formed between the subject site, the freeway, and East Avenue. To the south and east, the site is bounded by vacant land in a residential district. The second site area on Eitwanda Avenue is bounded by vacant land to the north and east in residential districts. To the west, the site is bounded by residences and vacant land in a residential district. To the south, the site is bounded by a residence and vacant land and a residence, within the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Rebecca Van Buren, AICP, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (X) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality (X) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards ( ) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1 ) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: R~t~ecca Van Buren, AICP Associate Planner August 25, 1999 Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: LAND b) c) d) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No lineact Inco~'oorated Irr~act Imoact USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' Conflict with general plan designation or ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) zoning? Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? () () () (X) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) The proposed project is a request to amend the General Plan and Specific Plan land use maps. The project reflects an "exchange" of land use designations between two equally sized, vacant properties. A Medium Residential designation on a 20-acre site adjoining the freeway is proposed to be shifted to a 20-acre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor. The Low-Medium Residential designation on the 20-acre site adjoining the Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor is proposed to be shifted to the 20-acre site adjoining the freeway. No development is proposed at this time. m Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Iml~act Less Pote~tiatiy Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incomorated Inlyact IreDact POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.' a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Comments: a - c) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan or estimated population. g) h) i) Comments: Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Inl~l~'t Incomorated IreDact IreDact GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) a-i) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size. There is no development proposed in this application. Issues and Su13~oorting Infom3ation Sources: WATER. a) b) c) d) Potentially Significant impact Less Potentially Unless Then significant Mitigation Significant No Irnm~t Incon3orated Irareact Im~w't Will the proposal result in: Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Issues ancl Supporling Information Sources: e) f) g) h) i) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Then Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incomorated Irf~Bact Imoact Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) () () (X) Comments: a - i) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size. There is no development proposed in this project. = Issues and Supporling Information Sources: AIR QUALITY. a) b) c) d) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incoroorated IreDact Irnoact Would the proposal: Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a - d) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. proposal result in: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) Would the Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incoroorated Imoact Impact Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan or estimated population. As a result, no changes in project trip generation area are anticipated with this action. Issues and Supporting Infon'natio~ Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less PotantiaJly Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No In-~act Incomorated In~act Irneact BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Comments: a - e) No development is proposed with the project. Future development applications will be subject to a separate environmental review to determine potential impacts to the environment. = Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. proposal: a) b) Would the Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigationSignificantNo Imoact IncomoratedImpact Imeaot Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? () () () (X) Use non-renewable resoumes in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a - c) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. Issues and Supporting Information Source~: HAZARDS. a) b) c) d) e) Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigationSignificantNo Ir1'~m:l IrlcofooratedImPact Inqoaot Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Comments: a -e) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. 10. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signilicant Mitigation Significant No Irr~act Incomorated Imoact lineact () () () (x) ( ) () ( ) (x) Comments: a -b) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). Both proposed land uses are commonly associated with the adjoining site conditions; i.e. Low-Medium Residential land uses commonly abut the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and Medium Residential land uses commonly abut the commercial corridors. Hence, the proposed designations are consistent with land use arrangements and land use compatibilities in the City. Future development will be subject to a separate environmental review to determine impacts and appropriate measures to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate negative impacts to acceptable levels. No development is proposed in this project. 11. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) b) c) d) e) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigatio~ Significant No Imoact Incoroorated Imoect In'.~act Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a - e) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 12. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) Comments: a - g) Potentially Significant Impac'1 Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incoroorated IreDact Impact Power or natural gas? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Communication systems? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? () () ( ) (X) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. 13. Issues and Supporling Information Sources: AESTHETICS. a) b) c) Would the proposal: Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Create light or glare? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Irf~act Incorporated IreDact Imoact () () () (x) () ( ) ( ) (x) () ( ) () (x) Comments: a - c) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. 7/ Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 14. Issues and Supporling Information Sources: CULTURAL RESOURCES. a) b) c) d) e) Comments: a - e) Potentially Significant Irr~aot Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Imoact Incorooratsd In'~act Irnoact Would the proposal: Disturb paleontological resoumes? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) () (X) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. 15. Issues and Supposing Information Sources; RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? PotentiNly Significant ' Irncact Less PotentiaJly Unless Then Significant Mitigatioct Significant No In13act Incoroorated Irr~act Imoact () ( ) () (x) () () () (x) Comments: a - b) The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two vacant site areas of equal size (20 acres each). This equal exchange of land use designation is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan. No development is proposed in this project. Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 16. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Lees Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Irr~act Incoroorated Irr~act Irnoact MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) () () () (X) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) EARLIERANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981 ) Initial Study for GPA 99-04 and ESPA 99-01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH #82061801, certified July 6, 1983) City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 Public Review Period Closes: September 22, 1999 Project Name: Project Applicant: Overland Company, % Joseph Oleson Project Location (also see attached map): South of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue and on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Project Description: A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. (Date City Council adopts Neclative Declaration) Date of Determination Adopted By DRAFT EXCERPT FROM SEPTEMBER 29, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Eftwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100- 061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY- A request to change the Eftwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Eftwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100- 061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel asked if all of the property owners in Area 1 are in agreement with the request. Mr. Coleman replied that the applicant controls most of the properties. He indicated that Cucamonga County Water District owns one property and has provided a letter of support and indicated there are plans to build a water tower on the property. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Joseph Oleson, 4891 Noline Place, Palm Desert, supported staffs position. He reported that Ovedand Company controls all of the land in Area I except for the Cucamonga County Water Distdct site and said they control the property located in Area 2. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public headng. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MACIAS, MANNERINC, MCNIEL, STEWART NONE TOLSTOY - carded PC Adjourned Special Meeting Minutes EXHIBIT "B" -6- September 29, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 A. Recitals. 1. Overland Company has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 22, and continued to September 29, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 22, and September 29, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two areas, each with approximately 20 acres of land. Area 1 is basically a linear configuration which flanks the south side of the Interstate 15 freeway with frontage on East Avenue and is presently vacant. Area 2 is basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), respectively; and b. The properties to the north of the subject sites are designated freeway and Low- Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the west are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the east are within the City of Fontana and are vacant. The properties to the south are designated Low-Medium Residential and Commercial, respectively, and contain vacant land and a residence, a retail store, and vacant land, respectively. PLANNING COMMISSION r~ESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 29, 1999 Page 2 99-89 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. A Low- Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 1, consistent with the other Low-Medium districts abutting the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Eftwanda Area. The proposed Low-Medium designation was shown in the master plan for approved Tentative Tract 15711 to depict circulation and a potential subdivision design. A Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 2 adjoining a commercial corridor to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Area 2 is shown on the Eftwanda Specific Plan Concept Plan of"Relative Land Use Intensities" as an appropriate site for higher land use intensities because of the proximity to major traffic and commercial corridors. The proposed Medium designation in Area 2 is consistent with existing property lines and contains ample frontage along Etiwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. The property configurations in Area 2 provide opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates Area 1 as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Eftwanda Specific Plan; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. PLANNING COMMISSION r~ESOLUTION NO. 99-89 GPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 29, 1999 Page 3 b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. 99-04. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1999. PI_ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r, I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 29th day of September 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HACIAS, t4ANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:' TOLSTOY RESOLUTION NO. 99-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 A. Recitals. 1. Overland Company has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Amendment No. 99-01 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Eftwanda Specific Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 22, and continued to September 29, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public headrig on September 22, and September 29, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two areas, each with approximately 20 acres of land. Area 1 is basically a linear configuration which flanks the south side of the Interstate 15 freeway with frontage on East Avenue and is presently vacant. Area 2 is basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Eftwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), respectively; and b. The properties to the north of the subject sites are designated freeway and Low- Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the west are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the east are within the City of Fontana and are vacant. The properties to the south are designated Low-Medium Residential and Commercial, respectively, and contain vacant land and a residence, a retail store, and vacant land, respectively. PLANNING COMMISSION .,ESOLUTION NO. 99-90 ESPA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 29, 1999 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and _ and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. A Low- Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 1, consistent with the other Low-Medium districts abutting the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Eftwanda Area. The proposed Low-Medium designation was shown in the master plan for approved Tentative Tract 15711 to depict circulation and a potential subdivision design. A Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 2 adjoining a commercial corridor to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Area 2 is shown on the Eftwanda Specific Plan Concept Plan of"Relative Land Use Intensities" as an appropriate site for higher land use intensities because of the proximity to major traffic and commercial corridors. The proposed Medium designation in Area 2 is consistentwith existing property lines and contains ample frontage along Eftwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. The property configurations in Area 2 provide opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates Area I as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. PLANNING COMMISSIOI, .,ESOLUTION NO. 99-90 ESPA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 29, 1999 Page 3 b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 99-01. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: B~~ec~ , ~.-'~Brad I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 29th day of September 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendments (GPA) 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C; Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments (ISPA) 99-02, 99-03, AND 99-04; and Development District Amendments (DDA) 99-03, 99-04, AND 99-05 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999 Project Applicant: Griffin Industries and City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map): Located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue- APN: 210-062-31, 10, 28, and 34. Project Description: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for an approximately 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for two parcels (10,890 and 15,600 square feet in size, respectively) which abut the aforementioned parcel to the north from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05 also propose to change the land use and zoning designation for another parcel (1.6 acres in size) which abuts the aforementioned 18.5-acre parcel to the south from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. November 3, 1999 Date of Determination Adopted By (~ 5, A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL; AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDAAVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 A. Recitals. 1. Overland Company has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 22, and continued to September 29, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two areas, each with approximately 20 acres of land. Area I is basically a linear configuration which flanks the south side of the Interstate 15 freeway with frontage on East Avenue and is presently vacant. Area 2 is basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), respectively; and b. The properties to the north of the subject sites are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the west are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the east are within the City of Fontana and are vacant. The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 properties to the south are designated Low-Medium Residential and Commercial, respectively, and contain vacant land and a residence, a retail store, and vacant land, respectively. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. A Low-Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 1, consistent with the other Low-Medium districts abutting the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Area. The proposed Low-Medium designation was shown in the Master Plan for approved Tentative Tract 15711 to depict circulation and a potential subdivision design. A Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 2 adjoining a commercial corridor to provide suppod for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Area 2 is shown on the Etiwanda Specific Plan Concept Plan of "Relative Land Use Intensities" as an appropriate site for higher land use intensities because of the proximity to major traffic and commercial corridors. The proposed Medium designation in Area 2 is consistent with the existing property lines and contains ample frontage along Eftwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. The property configurations in Area 2 provide opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates Area 1 as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Eftwanda Specific Plan; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 99-04, a request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. LM EXISTING GOVERNMENT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT M / / / / M / / CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY AREA 1 LM v,,,c/,m' LM OP ~ FOOIHIL_ LM LM LM .o~1_ .~ LM ' Y/"///,,,~.A R EA 2 ~////~ M T MEADOWS LM v,,c.Mr LM / / / / Cll'Y LIMITS ZONE BOUNDARY LINE SITE PLAN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 A. Recitals. 1. Overland Company has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Amendment 99-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Etiwanda Specific Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 22, and continued to September 29, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two areas, each with approximately 20 acres of land. Area 1 is basically a linear configuration which flanks the south side of the Interstate 15 freeway with frontage on East Avenue and is presently vacant. Area 2 is basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), respectively; and b. The properties to the north of the subject sites are designated freeway and Low- Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the west are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the east are within the City of Fontana and are vacant. The properties to the south are designated Low-Medium Residential and Commercial, respectively, and contain vacant land and a residence, a retail store, and vacant land, respectively. ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. A Low- Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 1, consistent with the other Low-Medium districts abutting the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Area. The proposed Low-Medium designation was shown in the Master Plan for approved Tentative Tract 15711 to depict circulation and a potential subdivision design. A Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 2 adjoining a commercial corridor to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Area 2 is shown on the Etiwanda Specific Plan Concept Plan of "Relative Land Use Intensities" as an appropriate site for higher land use intensities because of the proximity to major traffic and commercial corridors. The proposed Medium designation in Area 2 is consistent with the existing property lines and contains ample frontage along Etiwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. The property configurations in Area 2 provide opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates Area 1 as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Eftwanda Specific Plan; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. ORDINANCE NO. ESPA 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, a request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as shown in the Exhibit 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 1999. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN -VI M M.d~ OP~ ~.'UT. ' :. ~)FFICIAL figure oJ:sT,,CT I LAND USE MAP 5-1 OVERLAY PROPOSED LAND USE CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 3, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner Duane Morita, Contract Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue -APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map (Subarea 16), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN November 3, 1999 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-28 and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends the issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of General Plan Amendments 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99- 05C; Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments 99-02, 99-03, and 99-04; and Development District Amendments 99-03, 99-04, and 99-05. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At its October 13, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the approval of the subject General Plan Amendments, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments, and Development District Amendments. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the proposed applications. Additional background and staff analysis of the project are contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report of October 13, 1999. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN November 3, 1999 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDINGS The Planning Commission findings are contained in the attached staff report of October 13, 1999. If the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission, it may adopt them for its actions on these applications. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SS\DM\Is Attached: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Resolution Ordinance Ordinance Resolution Ordinance Ordinance - Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 13, 1999 - Minutes from October 13, 1999, Planning Commission Meeting Approving General Plan Amendment 99-05A Approving Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 Approwng Development District Amendment 99-03 Approwng General Plan Amendment 99-05B Approwng Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 Approwng Development Distdct Amendment 99-04 Resolution Approwng General Plan Amendment 99-05C Ordinance Approwng Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 Ordinance Approving Development District Amendment 99-05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 13, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner Duane Morita, Contract Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map (Subarea 16), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development Distdct zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. ITEHS PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05- GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-28 and 34. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue APN: 210-062-10. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Ao Project Density: Proposed amendments to the General Plan, Industrial Area Specific Plan, and Development District regulations will allow development of 4-8 dwelling units per acre of land. Presently, Industrial Park uses, consistent with provisions contained in the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16) are allowed. South - East - West - Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Currently vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan Currently vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan Approved Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development; Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 3 General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16) North South - East West Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16) Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16), Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subareas 4 and 5) Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) Site Characteristics: The properties associated with the proposed applications are located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue, within the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). The 18.5-acre Griffin Industries site is presently vacant and directly abuts the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development, which is located to the west and southwest. Several single-family residences exist within the 0.7-acre properties located immediately to the northeast of the 18.5-acre site. The 1.6-acre site also has several residential structures located onsite. One of the structures on the property, the Lucas Ranch House, is a significant cultural resource with a potential National and State Register designation as well as a potential Local'Landmark designation. ANALYSIS: Background: In November 1996, the City approved the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development for a 76.6-acre site within the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). Concurrently, the City initiated and re-designated two adjoining parcels from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, to Low-Medium Residential. Staff recommended that these two parcels be re-designated from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential, to be compatible with the residential development. General: The applicant, Griffin Industries, intends to expand their Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development. To allow for this expansion, the applicant is requesting a General Plan Amendment to re-designate their property from Industrial Park (Industrial Area Specific Plan - Subarea 16) to Low-Medium Residential; a Specific Plan Amendment to remove the property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and a Development Distdct Amendment to re-zone the property from Industrial Park (I ndustrial Area Specific Plan - Subarea 16) to Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). Those applications that are requested by Griffin Industries include GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03. In reviewing Griffin Industries' applications, staff is of the opinion that the surrounding parcels within Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan should also be re- designated from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential to be consistent with the proposed expansion and other Low-Medium Residential areas within Subarea 16, and because it is unlikely these parcels will be developed for Industrial Park uses. These particular parcels are grouped within two separate locations. One of the locations, which totals 0.7 acres, abuts the 18.5-acre Griffin Industries parcel to the northeast. The City-initiated applications include GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04. This location will be referenced in this staff report as the "north parcels." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 4 The other location, which is 1.6 acres in size, abuts the 18.5-acre Griffin Industries parcel to the southeast. Those City-initiated applications include GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. This location will be referenced in this staff report as the "south parcel." Refer to Exhibit "A," which presents the locations of the proposed applications. Exhibit "B" presents the Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Map. Surrounding Properties and Land Uses: The property to the north (southwest comer of Sixth Street and Archibald Avenue) is approximately 18.5 acres in size and is currently vacant. The property has a land use and zoning designation of Industrial Park. The uses permitted within this property are industrial. However, Neighborhood Commercial uses (listed as permitted or conditionally permitted in the Development Code) may be considered within a 5-acre area at or near the corner of Sixth Street and Archibald Avenue, subject to approval of a master plan. The property to the south (northwest corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue) is approximately 6.2 acres and is currently vacant. However, an Office Professional project (two office buildings and a health club) is proposed for this parcel. The proposed uses are permitted under the current zoning designation. Appropriateness of the Proposed Low-Medium Residential Designation: This section separately evaluates the proposed applications applicable to the Griffin Industries' parcel, the north parcels, and the south parcel. Griffin Industries Parcel: The applicant prepared and submitted to the City the document entitled, "CEQA Consistency Analysis - Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion (Exhibit"E"). The document was prepared to evaluate the fiscal, traffic, and air quality impacts resulting from the Gdffin Industries-initiated applications. According to the document, the proposed project will not result in any additional traffic or air quality impacts. Regarding fiscal implications, the document concludes that under the existing Industrial Park designation, the parcel will generate a net fiscal surplus to the City of $54,000 per year. If the parcel is re-designated to Low-Medium Residential, a $30,000 per year net fiscal surplus will be gained. Though the proposed applications will result in less net fiscal surplus to the City, the applications will still result in a positive fiscal gain. From a land use standpoint, the parcel is sufficient in size and can support the intended expansion of the abutting Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development. North Parcels: This particular area includes two separate parcels totaling 0.7 acres (10,890 and 15,600 square feet, respectively). Staff believes it is unlikely that these parcels will be developed for Industrial Park uses in the future for the following reasons. First, the parcels are small and development of Industrial Park uses on these parcels will be difficult. Industrial Park uses include offices, restaurants, and other larger-sized structures. These structures cannot be PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 5 reasonably developed on the small parcels. Secondly, the Industrial Area Specific Plan requires a 45-foot setback along Archibald Avenue and from residentially-zoned property, which further reduces the developable area for each parcel. Thirdly, several residential structures already exist on each parcel. The proposed re-designation will allow these residential structures to be consistent with City zoning regulations. South Parcel: This particular parcel is adequate in size to support Industrial Park uses. However, similar with the aforementioned north parcels, this parcel has several residential structures existing onsite, which make industrial development difficult. Furthermore, one of the structures located onsite, the Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State Register listing as well as a potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed re-designation to Low-Medium Residential ensures the on-site residential structures, including the Lucas Ranch House, will be consistent with City zoning regulations. The proposed re-designation is also more compatible with the possible preservation of the Lucas Ranch House and is in accordance with City policies. Staff supports Griffin Industries requests and the City-initiated applications. The applicant's requested applications allow expansion of the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development, provide positive fiscal position to the City, and are consistent with neighboring areas which are also designated Low-Medium Residential. The City-initiated applications are also supported by staff. The applications will allow more effective utilization of the north and south parcels, given their limited size and historic potential. Appropriateness of the existing Industrial Park DesiQnation: This section separately evaluates the existing Industrial Park designation for the Griffin Industries parcel, the north parcels, and the south parcel. Griffin Industries Parcel: This particular parcel could be developed under the existing Industrial Park designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. However, the applicant's plan to expand the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development could not implemented. North Parcels: The two separate parcels comprising this particular area are too small to adequately support Industrial Park uses. Secondly, the removal of existing residential structures located onsite would be required. South Parcel: This particular parcel is adequate in size to support Industrial Park uses, consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Future development could be difficult since one of the structures located on the site, the Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State Register designation as well as a potential Local Landmark designation placed on it. Future development would require removal or relocation of this potential historical structure and removal of other on-site structures. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 6 Housing: The proposed applications will reduce the amount of Industrial Park land uses in the City and increase Low-Medium Residential uses. The proposed applications will allow the applicant to expand the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development, thereby, providing greater housing diversity for the vicinity and City. Planning Commission: On September 8, 1999, the Planning Commission authorized staff to file GPA 99-05B and 99-05C. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit "F"). Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for Cucamonga Cornerpointe and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The EIR analyzed the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) as one of the project alternatives. However, the EIR did not specifically study the conversion of Cucamonga Comerpointe plus these four parcels to Low-Medium Residential. Consequently, the developer prepared a CEQA consistency analysis to review the impacts from this project. The developer used the analysis to complete Part I of the Initial Study and staff has completed Part II (Exhibit "G"). Staff, based on the information provided by the developer, has found that the proposed applications will not result in any significant effect on the environment. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings regarding these applications: The properties are suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated parcels. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expected because of the proposed land use change. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for a residential development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Dailv Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-03. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-05A, B, & C; ISPA 99-02, 99-03, & 99-04; DDA 99-03, 99-04, & 99-05 - GRIFFIN October 13, 1999 Page 7 Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03, and Development District Amendment 99-04. Adopt the attached resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04, and Development District Amendment 99-05. Recommend that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the above items. Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet City Planner BB:SS\Is Attached: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution Resolution - Location of Proposed Applications - Industrial Area Specific Plan Subarea 16 Map - General Plan Map - Development Districts Map - CEQA Consistency Analysis-Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion (distributed under separate cover) -Minutes from September 8, 1999, Planning Commission Meeting - Environmental Initial Study, Part II Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A Recommending Approval of Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 99-03 Recommending Approval of Genera Plan Amendment 99-05B Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C Recommending Approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 99-05 FIG. IV-18 .S AR A 1 Ravl~ed: 11/201~5 ClRCULAllON RAIL SERVICE t20' R.O.W. 0 0 0 0 Pedestrian ~. · ~ Creeks & Channels 100' R.O.W. ~' ~ lel~ ~O.W. ~ ~1 r Matter Plin 0 400' IBO0' 1 ~00' Note: Parcel lines cfid lot cofifigurationa are showa as approximation on~. 1The sites ~ may not I~e cu~entty owned Io~cti4m alta Kifi¢. The dep~tiol~ of a ~lte Is · ifid~at~ofi of a ll~oiected tuttle need tt~t adjusted Mr time at the City IV-gS RESl DENTIAL VERY LOW < 2 DU's/AC LOW 2-4 DU's/AC LOW- MEDIUM 4-8DU'$./AC MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC ' MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL/OFFICE ~ COMMERCIAL i:.:::::::i::.~ COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - ) NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. .~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL !::::::::!:!; OFFICE INDUSTRIAL : .' · ~ZZ~,. '- INDUSTRIAL ,.PARK ~://'~//,~ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ~ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ': OPEN SPACE :" .... ~.,~.~ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL :-~:--':'--::-:~'-~ FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD. --- SPECIAL BOULEVARD ! 4th '0, PUBLIC ,r.. :..: ~'-,: FACILITIES EXISTING SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS ~ PARKS '(EXISTING PARKS SHOWN CIVIC/COMMUNITY 'p') CITY OF RANCHO:C(JCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ~x, ~,3,~. Date CDl RC~U./OFFICE RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW/2 DU/AC LOW 2-4 DU/AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU/AC MEDIUM 8-14 DU/AC MEDIUM;HIGH 14-24 DU/AC HIGH 24-30 DU/AC SPECIFIC PLANS i~ll..,ll -, · LS.P. I' INDUSTRI~,L SPECIFIC PLAN IBmtamil Im E'$'P'· ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ilmmlI [ F.S.P. ~ FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN milamlB ' CEQA CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS CORNERPOINTE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT EXPANSION (COPIES AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING AT THE PLANNING DIVISION PUBLIC COUNTER) EXHIBIT "E" th~--~.gatives are being dealt with through mitigations or have been resolved. She noted there is a comi.;; "hensive resolution with a multitude of requirements for the development. Chairman McN,-I felt the project had been thoroughly considered. Motion: Moved by St6 'cart, seconded by Mannerino, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving b velopment Review 98-10. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERh ~"~, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: TOLSTOY ABSENT: NONE - carne,. B. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAND TEN'I~ 'riVE PARCEL MAP 15320- MWH REALTY, LTD. - A subdivision of 6.99 acres of land into 2 p,.. :cels in the Industrial Park Development District (Subarea 6) and Haven Avenue Overlay Distn,' of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Ac,.'~ia Street - APN: 209-401-01. Chairman McNiel observed that the applicant requested a continuar,. * to October 13, 1999. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Tolstoy, to continue Parcel Ma~. ~ 5320 to October 13, 1999. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR THREE PARCELS IN CONNECTION WITH GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - A request to change the land use and zoning designation from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for land totaling 18.5 acres in size located between 4th and 6th Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 209-062-31. Brad Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel asked the designations of the surrounding parcels. Mr. Buller responded that Parcel 17 is Commercial and Parcel 42 is Industrial Park. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to authorize staff to file two additional General Plan Amendments to consider the two referenced parcels in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 99-05A. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NONE NONE - carried PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this~time. _~ ~¢¢¢ BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project Files: General Plan Amendments (GPA) 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments (ISPA) 99-02; 99-03, and 99-04, andDevelopment District Amendments (DDA) 99-03, 99-04, and 99-05. 2, Related Files: o Description of Project: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for an approximately 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for two parcels (10,890 and 15,600 square feet in size, respectively) which abut the aforementioned parcel to the north from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05 also propose to change the land use and zoning designation for another parcel (1.6 acres in size) which abuts the aforementioned 18.5-acre parcel to the south from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 10. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Griffin Industries Inland Empire Division 9540 Springbrook Court Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 General Plan Designation: Industrial Park Zoning: Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The parcels are surrounded by vacant land and single-family residences to the north; the approved Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development to the west and vacant land to the south; an industrial park and electrical substation to the east. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required: None Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality Transportation/Circulation Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Hazards Noise Mandatory Findings of Significance ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: f As3~l~fat'b PI~ anner September 16, 1999 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Section 15152 of the CEQA Guidelines encourages Lead Agencies to "tier" information from other previously-prepared Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) while preparing new environmental documents. Information and findings contained in the following responses are tiered from the document entitled, "Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR, SCH No. 95112019," prepared by Envicom in July 1996. Another document entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency Analysis," has also been prepared by Envicom in August 1999, for the proposed applications. Said document contains updated traffic, fiscal, and air quality analyses. Information and findings from this document are incorporated by reference into the following responses, as appropriate. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: LAND USE AND PLANNING. a) b) c) Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SigmficantMitigabon Sigmficant No Impact Incor~orateclImpact Impact Would the proposal.' Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-d) The Project is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation (GPA 99-05A)for an 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential in order to expand the currently approved Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development, which abuts the affected parcel to the west. The proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation would allow the affected parcel to be compatible with those neighboring parcels to the west, which are also designated Low-Medium Residential. The City initiated (GPA 99-05B and 99-05C) propose to also change the land use and zoning designation for three abutting parcels from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential, which would establish land use compatibility with the aforementioned GPA 99-05A. The latter two General Plan Amendment applications are also proposed since it is unlikely that industrial development could occur on the three parcels affected by the General Plan Amendments. The two parcels to the north are limited in size. The Industrial Park designation requires a 45-foot setback along Archibald Avenue and from residentially zoned property. Therefore, to develop these two parcels under the current land use and zoning designation, approval of variances would be required. The parcel to the south Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 4 is adequate in size to be developed with an industrial use; however, one of the structures on the parcel, the Lucas Ranch House, has a potential National and State Register designation as well as a potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed applications ensure that conflicts with local policies and regulations will not result. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUntass Than SignificantMibgabon SignificantNo Impact tncorDoratedlmDact Impact 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.' a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) () ( ) (X) Comments: a-c) The proposed project will not result in any residential development that would significantly increase population. Displacement will not occur. Issues and Supporting information Sources: GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) b) c) d) e) 0 g) h) i) Potentially Signdicant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Then S ~'lifmantMitigation SignificantNo Impact Incorlxx'atedImpact Impact Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Expansive soils."/ ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 5 Comments: a-i) The affected parcels are not characterized by seismic hazards any more than any other area in seismically active Southern California. Compliance with standard Uniform Building Code and City regulations and requirements ensures that significant geologic and seismic hazards will not result. ~ssues and Supporting Irfformatlon Sources Potentially S~gn~ficant ImF)act Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMihgat~on S~gnificentNo Impact IncorporatedImpact Impact c) d) e) f) g) h) i) WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, orthe rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-i) The proposed applications will not result in any significant changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or rates or amount of surface runoff. The developer is required to submit plans to the Engineering Division to ensure the affected parcels are afforded adequate drainage services. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 6 Issues anci Supporting lnformabon Sources: Potentially S~gnrf~cant Impact Less PotenhallyUnless Than S~gn~ficantM~t~gahon Sigmficant No Iml:,act IncorporatedImpact tml:,act 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal.' a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-d) The "Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR, SCH No. 95112019," prepared by Envicom in July 1996, concluded that significant short-term construction and long-term operational air quality impacts would result with the originally proposed 1996 Cornerpointe residential development. To offset these significant impacts, the City approved a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The document entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency Analysis," also prepared by Envicom in August 1999 for the proposed applications, now concludes that the proposed expansion of the Cornerpointe residential development would not result in any significant impact since the proposed expansion represents a less intensive development scenario than previously approved in 1996. The project is not of a scale or land use that would significantly alter regional climate or create objectionable odors. Issues and Supporhng Information Sources: Potentrally Signifmant Impact Less PotentallyUnless Than SignifmantMitigation Signifmant No Impact Incomo~ated Impact ImpaCt TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 7 Issues and Supl;:,orhng Information Sources' g) Rail or air traffic impacts? Comments: Potentially Sigmf~cant Iml~act Less PotentiallyUnless Than SigndicantMitigation S~gmf~..antNo Imoact IncorporatedIrnl~act Irnoact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) a-g) The document entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency Analysis" prepared by Envicom in August 1999 for the proposed applications, contains a traffic study prepared by WPA Traffic Engineering. The traffic study concludes that the proposed expansion of the Cornerpointe residential development would generate about 250 two-way peak hour trips and 75 and 95 morning and evening peak hour trips, respectively. The number of trips generated represents only 33 percent of the morning peak hour trips and 38 percent of the evening peak hour trips necessary to require a traffic impact study under the Congestion Management Program guidelines. Therefore, WPA concludes that the proposed project will not result in any significant traffic impacts. The applicant is required to comply with City Engineering regulations and standards to ensure hazards associated with access, entry, and turning movements will not occur. Parking will be provided in accordance with City requirements. The project is not of a scale that would conflict with alternative transportation requirements. Rail and air traffic will not be affected. o Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenbalty S~gnificant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than S~gn~ficantMitigation S~gnlficantNo Impact Incorl:~'atedImpact Impact BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-e) The Industrial Area Specific Plan area is located near the City's gateway entry. The entire vicinity is therefore intended for future development and is not characterized by any sensitive or significant biological resources. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 8 Issues and SupDOrtlng Informahon Sources: ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Impact Incorl:,oratedImpact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-c) The proposed applications are not of a land use or scale that would result in any significant impacts associated with energy and mineral resources. Issues and SuppoSing Information Sources: HAZARDS. a) b) c) d) e) Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Impact Inc.,o~'ooratedImpact Impact Would the proposal involve: A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-e) The proposed applications are not of a land use or scale that would result in any significant impacts associated with potential health hazards. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 9 10. Issues and Suppomng Information Sources NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Sigmf~cant Mibgation S~gnificant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact () () ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) a-b) The proposed applications include changes to land use and zoning designations from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. No increase in noise levels is anticipated as a result of the proposed land use changes. Residential uses typically generate less noise than Industrial uses. 11. ~ssues and Supporting ~nformahon Sources PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) b) c) d) e) Pota~ially Significant Impact Lass Potenbally Unless Than SignScant Mitigation Sigmf~cent No ImDact Incorporated Impact rinDact Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) According to the document entitled, "Cornerpointe Residential Development Expansion, CEQA Consistency Analysis" prepared by Envicom in August 1999, adequate fire protection services will be provided. This conclusion is rendered because Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan area is now within a Mello-Roos District which will create a positive cash flow to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. b) Likewise, the 1999 Envicom report concludes that police protection services will be adequate to service the proposed applications, since the San Bernardino Sheriffs Department has recently increased its number of sworn officers. c-e) The proposed al~plications are not of a scale or magnitude that will significantly impact schools, maintenance of facilities, or other services. 117 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 10 12. Issues and Supporting Informatton Sources: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result m a need for new systems or suppries or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communication systems? c) Local or regional water treatment facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? or distribution Potenhally S~gnrficant Impact Less PotenballyUnless Than SignScant M~tigat~on S~gn~f~,antNo Impact IncorporatedlinDact IreDact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-g) The proposed applications are not expected to have any adverse effects on utilities and service systems. The applicant is required to comply with City engineering requirements and standards to ensure that future development is afforded adequate utilities and services. 13. Issues and Supporhng Information Sources: Potentially S~gnd~.,ent Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigahon S ~lnif~..antNo Impact Incorl~oretedImpict Impact AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.' a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-b) The corner of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street is the City's gateway entry and therefore, is a sensitive location from a visual and aesthetic standpoint. The proposed project is approximately 600 feet north of the intersection; therefore, no aesthetic impacts are expected. The developer is required to comply with appropriate development and design standards of the City to ensure that future development is designed in a visually pleasing manner. c) The proposed applications will not result in any development of a land use or scale that would create significant light and/or glare impacts. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 11 14. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: CULTURALRESOURCES. a) b) c) d) e) Potenhally Sigmficant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Then Sign~ficentMibgat~o~ S~gnificantNo Impact ~ncorporatedImpact Impact Would the proposal: Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-b] d-e) The Industrial Area Specific Plan area is located near the City's gateway entry. The entire vicinity is therefore, intended for future development and is not characterized by any sensitive or significant cultural resources. .c) GPA 99-05C proposes to change land use and zoning from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential for a parcel that has an existing structure on it, the Lucas Ranch House, that has a Potential National and State Register designation as well as a potential Local Landmark designation. The proposed project would allow the structure to be consistent with the proposed zoning designation; Therefore, the impact to this potential historical resource is considered positive. 15. Issues and Supporhng Information Sources: RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? Potentially Signify, ant Irnl~aCt Less PotentiallyUnless Than S~gnificantMitigation S ignd~,a~ tNo Iml~aCt Incorlx~'atedIml~act Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-b) The proposed project may increase the demand on parks in the area. The project applicant will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant. Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 12 16. issues and Supporhng lnforrnatlon Sources Potenbally Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Impact IncorporatedImpact Impact c) d) MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlierdocument(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan Environmental Impact Report (Certified April 6, 1981) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) 146 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga GPA 99-05A, 99-05B, 99-05C, ISP 99-02, 99-03, 99-04, and DDA 99-03, 99-04, 99-05 Page 13 (x) Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Specific Plan, Subarea 16 EIR (SCH #95112019, certified July 1996) City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendments (GPA) 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C; Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments (ISPA) 99-02, 99-03, AND 99-04; and Development District Amendments (DDA) 99-03, 99-04, AND 99-05 Public Review Period Closes: October 13, 1999 Project Applicant: Griffin Industries and City of Rancho Cucamonga Project Location (also see attached map): Located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31, 10, 28, and 34. Project Description: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, and DDA 99-03 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for an approximately 18.5-acre parcel from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, and DDA 99-04 propose to change the land use and zoning designation for two parcels (10,890 and 15,600 squ~re feet in size, respectively) which abut the aforementioned parcel to the north from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05 also propose to change the land use and zoning designation for another parcel (1.6 acres in size) which abuts the aforementioned 18.5-acre parcel to the south from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, 'has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. (Date City Council adopts Ne(~ative Declaration) Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4- 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 -above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendmentwould not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. · 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: !n considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW < 2 DU's/AC LOW 2-4 DU'$/AC LOW- MEDIUM 4-SDU'~/AC MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU'$/AC HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL/OFFICE COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL : · .- · .F2~, '- INDUSTRIAL ,.PARK F,~ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ;:z2Z/ZZ] HEAVY INDUSTRIAL ': ~ ~h %........, O!~EN SPACE .... '-". HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL .':;,~-:-..::,,-.:. OPEN SPACE ~::'::':-:: :- ::"--:' FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD. ---- SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC FACILITIES EXISTING SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS ~ PARKS '(EXISTING PARKS SHOWN CIVIC/COMMUNITY 'p') RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVEAPPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN: 210-062-31. A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is des, ignated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 2 c. The application is part of a sedes of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Development Distdct Amendment 99-03, which re-designate the subject site to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 removing 18.5 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 in the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALDAVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 2 b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05A. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. ?.-,,v' IZI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES October 13, 1999 Page 3 c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public headng, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commissicn hereby recommends approval of Development Distdct Amendment No. 99-03 to change the zoning designation for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "B." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4- 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acres, with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue which are presently improved with residential structures. Said parcels are currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and related development; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that thero is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated therounder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESIDENTIAL I~ ..:.:,::j VERY LOW <2 DU's/AC ,~.,.~ LOW-MEDIUM 4-SDU's/AC ,...~ HIGH 24-3o DU's/AC ® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL ~....:..'.:.:-:, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ...... '"'" ~ ~ ~ NEIGHBORHOOD COMM. ~:~ REGIONAL COMMERCIAL :::::::::~:5~ OFFICE INDUSTRIAL' '...'- -' '~'-INDOSTRIAL'~PARK ~z//~/~ GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ~' ~ HE~VY INDU"~TRIAL N'sP-ACE"' ~::.:.',:..OPEN SPACE , ~:~:~:]FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD. ~ SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC FACILITIES EXISTING SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS' PARKS '(EXiSTiNG PARKS SHOWN 'P') CIVIC/COMMUNITY Title: '~','J~,4/-. p/..,4/V Exhibit: ~ Date: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUESTTO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. · 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng on October 13, 1999, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and are presently improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 18) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject parcels is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Development District Amendment 99-04, which re-designate the subject parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission dudng the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 removing two parcels totaling 0.7 acre of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 18) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals, 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre, with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue which are improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses, The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan 99-03; and do This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paregraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed distdct in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05B. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment 99-04 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "B." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: OVB~.AY /'-/9 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4- 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All regal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said parcel is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder;, that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon t~e findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 abo~,e, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 197 RESIDENTIAL VERY LOW <2 DU's/AC LOW 2-4 DU's/AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-SDUWAC MEDIUM 8-14 DU's/AC MEDIUM-HIGH 14-2,, DU's/AC HIGH 24-30 DU's/~C MASTER PLAN REQUIRED COMMERCIAL/OFFICE COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBOR.,p!OOD COMM. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OFFICE INDUSTRIAL : ..'- " · ~' IND:OS'i:RIAL,p~RK INDUSTRi~L :x,~,///////,, GENERAL ... ~ HEAVY INDUSTRIAL" '; 0FEr "sP c " ..... ' :...-.:-:~.~HILLSIDE RE~SiDENTIAL ~:.::.'.::..:...OPEN SPACE ~":--':-:::-:::~FLOOD CONTROL/UTILITY CORD. SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC ; .,; E .'J. H~ : e.'i.'l~ ; FACILITIES EXISTING SCHOOLS PROPOSED SCHOOLS ~ PARKS '(EXISTING PARKS SHOWN 'P') CIVIC/COMMUNITY '~:.:,4:'~:::" .'. j:, -:~,..": CITY OF RANICNO.CUCAMONGA PLANNING:DI. VISION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, REQUESTING TO REMOVE 1.8 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN MAP, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 1.6 acres of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Development District Amendment 99-05, which re-designate the subject parcels to Low Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and with related development; and e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 removing from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, 1.6 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. ISPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: S 7 /5/ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and also remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudrig the above- referenced public hearing on October 13, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres, with rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is improved with residential structures. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 2 Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission dudng the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05C. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning 15 Z PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 13, 1999 Page 3 Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Development District Amendment 99-05 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "B." 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Larry T. McNiel, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of October 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JTIJJJJ lJlITA J CJJill~ ~jj~-- l j OVEJJL,AY DRAFT EXCERPT FROM OCTOBER 13, 1999, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISPA) 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment (DDA) 99-03, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Go ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue -APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development Distdct zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan tc~ Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: G PA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Planning Commission Minutes ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development Distdct zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. -5- October 13, 1999 EXHIBIT "B" ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTAND INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and DDA 99-05. No ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development Distdct zoning designation for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Salvador Salazar, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked for clarification that the property north of the request is Commercial. Brad Buller, City Planner, confirmed that it is Industrial Park with Commercial uses allowed and said that no changes are proposed for that parcel. Commissioner Stewart asked if the parcels involved are within a target area in the General Plan Update process. Commissioner Mannedno said it is not. Bruce Stdckland, Gdffin Industries, 9540 Springbrook Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated they wish to expand the Cucamonga Comerpointe residential development. He showed pictures of the gate entrance and the proposed layout of the new development. He indicated they have provided for access points and have posted streets that may become through streets. Commissioner Tolstoy questioned what buffedng would be used between the project and Archibald Avenue. Mr. Stdckland replied they plan to move the proposed wall back about 10 feet beyond the minimum 45-foot setback. He said they will use a buffer similar to what they have placed along Fourth Street and they will buffer the whole site with fast growing trees. Chairman McNiel asked if they were working with the property adjacent to the channel. Planning Commission Minutes EXHIBIT "B" -6- October 13, 1999 /3'7 Mr. Stdckland responded they are negotiating with the owners of 9.8 acres to the northwest. Robert DeBerard, P O. Box 1223, Upland, stated that he owns 18 acres to the north of the site that is zoned Industrial Park with Commercial uses permitted. He was concerned about drainage and sewer lines. He asked if there are any plans to push the two cul-de-sacs through to his property. He asked how the City will protect his property. Mr. Strickland indicated that they are required to have special setbacks where the project borders commercial uses. He indicated there will be an 8-foot wall and extra setbacks. He noted they need to contain the drainage. Mr. DeBerard said he wanted to be sure they had the same safeguards as before the proposed change. Chairman McNiel assured him that he would. Headng no further testimony, he closed the public headng. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the parcel is large enough for industrial uses or an office building if the proposed change were not approved. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that it is. He noted that many years ago, Henry Rider designed a project for the site. Commissioner Tolstoy said that he hates to see people living along Archibald Avenue because of the tremendous truck traffic on Archibald. Because the property is large enough to support industrial uses, he preferred to retain its current zoning. He said he would like to hear the opinions of the other Commissioners and he supported saving Lucas Ranch. Commissioner Mannerino said he recalled the proposal from Henry Rider and noted it had not been built because it was not economically feasible. He supported the proposed changes. Commissioner Stewart felt the CEQA analysis indicates it is an appropriate move. Commissioner Macias concurred with staffs recommendation. He felt there are appropriate setbacks for the houses which will abut Archibald Avenue. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolutions recommending approval of General Plan Amendments 99-05A, 99-05B, and 99-05C; Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendments 99-02, 99-03, and 99-04; and Development District Amendments 99-03, 99-04, and 99-05. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: TOLSTOY ABSENT: NONE - carded Planning Commission Minutes EXHIBIT "B" -7- October 13, 1999 City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment 99-04 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01 Public Review Period Closes: September 29, 1999 Project Name: Project Applicant: Overland Company, % Joseph Oleson Project Location (also see attached map): South of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue and on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02, Project Description: A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map and the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. November 3, 1999 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. ~'~- ~ V~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05A as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO, GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 2 property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and properties properties. e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size,- and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 99-05A to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 3 shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. LEGEND Publicfacil~es.shp O PARK Openspace shp · ~,~ OPEN SPACE ~ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL Indust nal.shp Resk]ential shp ::~ LOW ~ MEDIUM Commercial shp ~) COMMERCIAL 500 0 (~ 500 lOO0 EXHIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALl FORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31. A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Amhibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 2 c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Development District Amendment 99-03, which re-designate the subject site to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 removing 18.5 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. FIG. IV-18 Revised: 11120/95 CIRCULATION II III TRAILS/ROUTES 120' R.O.W. O O O O Pedestrian ~o · '~J Creeks · Charmell 100' R.O.W. · · · · Bi~,=lo "' M' lollR'O.W- ~:~:::~ ~)~)fi~' ~.~ Plrk$ I I Exlltlng I I Bddg~ M Sp~=lol Streetlcapel Pl'oposed ~ ~c$~s P~ts 0 400' 800' Note: Pitcol lines end lot conll9u~itlons ire shown is ipprosimltlon only. IThe sites ihown may not b* ¢uffontiy owned not Is the locotiofi site specific. The depOtion of I ~te Is in indiaetlon ol I pfo~¢tod lutufe need that my be MJ)ulted o~ tk~ is th~ C~ty d~elops. EXHIBIT "A" ISPA //_,,7 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. Recitals. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also removed said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05A. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES November 3, 1999 Page 3 independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment No. 99-03 to change the zoning designation for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. RESIDENTIAL ~ VERY LOWz2 DU/AC ~ LOW 2-4 DU/AC * ~ . LOW-MEDIUM 4-a DU/AC ~ M ~ MEDIUM a-;40U/AC . ~ MEDIUM"HIGH 14-24 DU/AC I H I HIGH 24-30 DU/AC. SPECIFIC PLANS .. · a~.LSi~iJ"INDUSTRI]~L sPEcIFIC PLAN · F-S~ · ETIWANDA sPECIFIC PL~;N mmmmm~m i F. SJ=. i FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN-' mill-- EXHIBIT "A" DDA /71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05B as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acres, with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue which are presently improved with residential structures. Said parcels are currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and related development; and and do This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, ,this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 99-05B to change the General Plan CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 5oo ' '"o (~) 5O0 I LEGEND Publicfacilittes.shp PARK Openspace shp OPEN SPACE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL FLOOD CONTROLRJTILITY CORRIDOR Industrial shp INDUSTRIAL PARK OENERAL INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL MIXED USE COMMERCIAL RECREATION Residential shp VERY LC~N LOW LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM HI~ Commercial shp ~ OFFtCE 1000 E]HIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. ~¢;' //"// AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALl FORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two pareels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and are presently improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16)in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject parcels is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Development District Amendment 99-04, which re-designate the subject parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and and eo This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public 177 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 removing two parcels totaling 0.7 acre of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. · FIG. IV-18 $U AREA Revised: 11/20195 6th 4th CIRCULATION IIIII TRAILS/ROUTES t~O.W. · · · · ~ 0 400' 800' Note: P&rOOf Iboo amd lot ooofk~m'ntlons are ~J~mvn 88 8ppfo~imatlo~ o~y. Jo~mtJo~ ~Ito specific. The depletloe of · a~te J~ mq idia~otloo of · J)tojeete~f future md that may be ted ~ floe is the City Me. EXHIBIT "A" ISPA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also removed said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre, with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue which are improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This.amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan 99-03; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05B. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-04 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. I L I LOW 2-4 OU/AC * i LM ! '. LOW-MEDIUM 4-a DU/AC I ~ I MEDIUM a-140u/Ac .. I MH I MEDIUM"HIGH 14-24 OU/AC ! H I' HIGH =,4-30DU/AC. · ~.l J ~=.~.~ ETIWANDA sPECIFIC PI.J(N FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN.' EXHIBIT "A" DDA RESOLUTION NO. ~?-z~/-//,~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for General Plan Amendment 99-05C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a.duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said parcel is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment 99-05C to change the General Plan CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. LEGEND Publicfacilifies.shp PARK Openspace.shp OPEN SPACE fill.I. SIDER ESIOEHTiAI. FLOOD CONTROL/UTII.fTY CORRIDOR IndustdaLshp Residential shp : !~ LOW Commercial shp ~ REGIONAL CO~ME RCIAL ~ OFFICE 500 0 (~500 1 1000 E](HIBIT "A" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ORDINANCE NO. ~' ! ~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIALAREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to 1.6 acres of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-04 - CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Development District Amendment 99-05, which re-designate the subject parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. ISPA 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 removing from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, 1.6 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. FIG. IV-18 $U AREA Revised: 11/20195 6th Z < CII~tULATlO~ RAL SF. RV~ II II I 110' ILO.W. 100' 88' M Sell ILO.W. ~oto: Pirctl II~lo aM lot ;ofiliguratMa are el)own as appro~imatiofi only. IThe shot aM)wa may n~t be cuntfitly aremad not Is the Io4~tkxt I~te Ipe~tftc. The delMarloft ol a ~te is an kldiiition of Id)ulte4 ~ IN'O~t:tod futm'e ll44M that ~ be time is the ~Aty devmk~l. EXHIBIT "A" ISPA ORDINANCE NO. ~/7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-05 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low-Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and also remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and also removed said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 2 above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single pamel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres, with rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is improved with residential structures. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan arid with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04; and and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence-presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05C. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 3, 1999 Page 3 b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-05 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. I L -I LM I MH I N LOW 2-4 DU/AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU/AC MEDIUM 8-14 DLUAC MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU/AC HIGH 24-30 DU/AC. · E.S.P. I ~_'..m." ETIWANDA sPECIFIC P!.~N · · F.s.o. · FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN.' milan EXHIBIT "A" DDA November 2, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION City of Rancho Cucamonga REz GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES proJect for 18.5 acres between 4th & 6th Streets west of Archibald Ave. Dear Sir, I am writing in favor of the above project and related general plan issues. I own and live on the adjacent property to the south. Griffin Industries has been a very good neighbor during the construction process of the homes directly west of me and I also look forward to having them as a neighbor to the north of me. Griffin Industries has taken vacant land with abandoned vineyards that had also become a .dumping ground, and turned it into a high quality development that has become an asset to our community. Please forward this letter the City Council. Sincerely, George T. Assanelli 9510 Archibald Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730 (909) 987-2214 Carla F1 orance 9580 Meadow Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-3262 November 3, 1999 Rancho Cucamonga City Council 10500 Civic Center Drive RanchoCucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Council Members: As an interested party I would like to comment regarding the Griffin Industries request to develop 18.5 acres (Subarea 16) of the General Plan Land Use Map. When reviewing available documents and in talking with staff members, it seems apparent that no recorded discussion regarding the historical status of the Lucas Complex located between 4th and 6th Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue has been considered. Therefore, because the LuCas Complex is eligible for review as a historical preservation site, an official review process should be considered before you make a decision to build residential or industrial on either side of the Lucas Complex. When reviewing the historical status of the Lucas Complex and future uses of the site the review board may want to consider'the site for a cultural center, museum, or bed and breakfast. When considering the future uses of the Lucas Complex site please consider parking, lighting, and access. Our historical sites are important landmarks that link our past with our present and future. Greater attention to this matter is warrented through assignment of a special committee and then on to public review and comment. As an interested party, please keep me informed as to your decision regarding the land development surrounding the Lucas Complex, as well as the development along Archibald Avenue between 4th and 6th Streets. Sincerely, Carla Florance