The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994/04/20 - Agenda Packet PAGE City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 1 ADDENDUM MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSSION PROPERTY MATTERS PER GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE; JAMES MARKMAN AND LINDA D. DANIELS NEGOTIATING FOR THE CITY WITH VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, TO DISCUSS TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ihereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 14, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. C TY COUNCm AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.mi Apri] 20, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, C'alifornia 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember Jack Lain, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PAGE City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 1 All Items submitted for the CIty Council Agenda must be In writing. The deadline for submitting these Items Is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. RoliCall: Buquet , Aiexander__,StoiJt W'~klms , and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONR 1. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring the MOnth of April as Fair Housing Month. 2. Presentation of Proclamation Declaring the Week of Apdl 17 - 23. 1994 as Libran/Week in Rancho Cucamonga. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLI(~ This Is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D, CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-~ontroverslal. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/30/94 and 4/6/94; and Payroll ending 3/24/94 fat the total amount of $ 1,573J:]57.69. 2. Approval tO receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 7 March 31, 1994. PAGE i City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 2 3. Approval to authortze the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids' 13 for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street, Federal Aid Project No. STPLNHG-5420 (003) to be funded from FAU Streets, Account No. 24-4637-8914. RESOLU11ON NO. 94-060 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROV1NG PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRIJCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET. FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLNHG-5420 (003). IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" 19 for the Right Turn Lane at Archibald Avenue and Base Line ROad, to be funded from Ga~ Tax Account No. 09-4637-9211. I RESOLU11ON NO, 94-061 2 1 A RESOLUllON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, A~VING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 'RiGHT TUr~I LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD,' IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting BIds' 25 fOr Highland Avenue from plus or minus 420 feet west of LOCust Avenue to plus Or minus 1;250 feet east of LOCust Avenue, to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09-4637-9209. RESOLUTK:]N NO. 94-062 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CrTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALiFORNIA, APPf',K:)VING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR 'HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM PLUS OR MINUS 420 FEET WEST OF LOCUST AVENUE TO PLUS OR MINUS 1,250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AVENUE." IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BiDS PAGE t)'~ City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 3 6. Approval to transfer City vehicle to the County of San Bemardino 31 for police services. 7. Approval of request by Rancho San Antonio Medical Center to 32 Waive City Fee in conjunction with the 'Healthy Kids" Day Event. This event is sponsored by the r~ancho Cucamonga Antonio Medical Center and the YMCAS of Rancho Cucamongo and Upland and is open to the public with no charge. 8. Approval of a Temporan/Variance of Spods Field Lighting at 34 Heritage Park from July 5 - ,30, 1994. 9. Approval to extend Camcast Cable TV Franchise. 36 RESOLUTION NO. 91~12P 37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BEI'~IARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10. Approval to Destroy RecOrds and Documents which ore no 38 longer required as provided under Government Code Sections 34[]~arK:134[]~.5. I'~ESOLLrnON NO. 94063 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFOi',~IIA, AUTHORITJNG THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED PI'~OVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 340~AND340~5 11. Approval of Resolution amending Resolution No. 93-142 to incorporate Personnel Classifications and Sala~, Benefits for LibroW Serv~C4~ Position for Fiscal Year 1993/94. RESOLU11ON NO. 93-142-C 8:]. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 TO INCORPORATE PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY BENEFITS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES POSITION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PAGE CIty Council Agenda April 20, 1994 4 12, Approval to set annual Special tax for Community Facilities District 82 NO. 93-3 (FOOthill Marketplace). RESOLUTION NO. 94-064 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES Di~II~CT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) 13. Approval of a Resolution establishing an annual levy within the 90 Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the Sixth Street Industrial Park Refund DistriCt No. 82-1R, the Rancho Cucamonga Drainage DLstrict No. 86-2 and Milliken South of Arrow Dlstdct No. 89-1. RESOLUTION NO. 94-065 91 A RESOLUTION OF THE Ci'I'Y COUNCIL OF THE Cn'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 14. Approval to set annual special tax for Community Facilities Dlstdct 93 No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). RESOLUTION NO. 94-066 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLJ,.~,HING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) 15. Approval tO execute a Release of Real Property Improvement 101 Contract and Lien Agreement for 5354 Haven Avenue, located on the southwelt COmer of Vista Grove Street and Haven Avenue, sul::tnitl'ed by Hllk:le Community Church. I~r. SOLUTION NO. 94067 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND MEN AGREEMENT FOR 5354 HAVEN AVENUE 16. APProval to execute a contract (CO 94-022) with the County of San 104 .Bernordlno for the collection of special assessments for Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (FOOthill Marketplace). PAGE '~ City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 5 17. Approval to execute two (2] Lease Agreements (CO 94-023 and ].06 CO 94-024) behNeen the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lessor) and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct (Lessee) for Fire Station No. 4 and Fire Station No. 5 rest3ectively. 18. Approval to appropriate funds from Fund 12 - Transportation 108 Development Act (TDA) Article 8 in an amount of $326J~0.00 and an award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94025) for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, Phase I, located at Millikan Avenue and the Metrolink Railway, to Riverside Construction for the amount of $3,119,728.70 ($2]~36,177.00 plus contingency), to be funde(l from San Bemardino County Measure I Account No. 37`4637-9326, State Proposition 108 Passenger Rail Bond Act Account No. 36-4637-9326, and TDA Article 8 Account No. 12-4637-9326. 19, Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94- 124 026) for the Etlwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements and Trail Modifications, located west of EtNvanda Avenue and south of Highland Avenue, to KDK Engineering Constructors for the amount of S158,591.40 ($144,174.00 plus 10% contingency). to be funde<] from Account No. 41-4130-9321. ~n. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94- 129 027) with Ladner Coatings for Resurfacing of Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, in the amount of $186,301.50 ($169,365.D0 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from RDA Account No. 17-15[X]:]. 21. Approval to award and authorization to execute contract (CO 94- 133 028) with IPS SaNices, Incorporated for the 1993/94 Fiscal Year Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Hot Asphalt Rubber 0veday, Cape Seal and SIuRy Seal, for the amount of S648,162.48 (S589238.62 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Systems Development Funds, Account No. 22- 4637-9313, 22-4637-9311 and Account No. 10~3637-9113. 22. Approval tO owarcl ~ authorization to execute contract (CO 94- 141 029) with Ulxlerwood Construction Company for the Hellman Avenue at Ninth Street Improvement Project, for the amount Of $41 X>96.60 ($37,906.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Proposition 111 Fund, Account No. 09`4637-9304. 23. Approval to execute Amendment No. 5 to the Lease between the 145 City of Rancho Cucamongo and Valley Baseball Club, Incoq3orated (CO 92-064) to allow the tenant to continue to lease additional space at the Sports Complex for calendar year 1994. PAGE i"~ City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 6 24. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 147 Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by I~ancho Citilcnd Development. RESOLUTION NO. 94068 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APP~V1NG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 128Q5 2~. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 150 Tract 13280, located on the north side of Base Une Road between Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue, suDmitted by Premier Homes. RESOLU11ON NO. 94-069 152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ~VING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPf, K:)VEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13280 2(>. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 153 Tract 13851, Iocatecl on the northeast comer of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue. submitted by Pacific International Development. RESOLU11ON NO, 94-070 155 A RESOLUllON OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPROV1NG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT ]3851 27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 156 Tract 13945, located on the southeast Comer Of East Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Citation Builders. RESOLUTION NO. 94071 158 A RESOLUIlON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CItY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPRO%qNG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13945 2,8. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 159 Tract 14121, located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development. PAGE City Council Agend8 April 20, 1994 7 RESOLU11ON NO. 94072 161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPr'~:)VING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPf',~)VEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 29. Approval to accept Improvements, Release Of BOnds and Notice 162 of Completion for Tract 13280 - Landscape, located on the nodh side of Base Line Road at Ellena Avenue. Relecse: Faithful Peffon~ance BOnd $ 5062:10.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94073 163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOrd( 30. Approval to accept Improvements. Release of BOnds and Notice 164 of Completion for Tract 13280 - Railroad Crossing. located on Kenyon Way at the SOdhem Pacific Railroad Tracks. Release: Faithful Performance BOnd $ RESOLUTION NO. 94074 165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPI~D VEMENTS FOR TRACT 13280 - RAIbtOAD CROSSNGo AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOI?K 31. Approval to occept Improvements, Release Of Bonds ond Notice 166 of Completion for-Tract 13281 - Londscope0 located on the northwest come{ of Born Line Road ond Rochester Avenue. Release: Faithful Perfon'nance BOnd S 401,1(]:).[]0 RESOLUTION NO. 94-075 167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPP,',',',~VEMENTS FOR TRACT 13281 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOTICE OF COMR,ET1ON FOR THE WORK PAGE '~' City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 8 32. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of BOnds and Notice 168 of Completion for Tract 13753 - Landscape, located on the north side of BOse Line Road at Ellena Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance BOnd S 225,71:]3.00 I~SOLUllON NO. 94076 169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CFrY COUNCIL OF THE ClIY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13753 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 170 3,3. Approval tO accept Improvements, Release Of BOnds and Notice of Completion for CUP 90-18, located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue hath of 4th Street. Release: Faithful Peffornance Bond (Street) $137;111.C[] RESOLUTION NO, 94077 171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 90-18 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 34. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of BOnds and NOtice 172 of Completion for Parcel Map 9350, located on Base Une Road between Millikan Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Release Faithful PerfGrrnanc~ Bond: Base Une Road S1,191.g04.[]:] Infrastructure~ 385,131 Medians 457L'~L's00 IF,,SOLUT1ON NO. 94078 173 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO NGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBUC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9350 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK .,~ PAGE City Council Agerids April 20, 1994 9 3,5. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract ].74 13441, located on the nodheast comer of Kenyon Way, and Victoria Park Lane. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) S 36. ApprOval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract ].75 13930 - Landscape, located on the east side of Hellman Avenue at Wilson Avenue. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 37. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice ].76 of Completion far the Neighborh(x)a Center Improvement Project, CO 93-070. RESOLUTION NO. 94-079 ]. 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOr~NIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FLUNG OF A NOT1CE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK E. CONSENT ORDINANCE,ci The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion, The City Clerk will read the title. Any Item can be removed for discussion, 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL A-~-~F~MENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-0'2 - MASI PARTNERS - A request to modify Subarea 7 to allow limited Commercial On 27 acres Of land located at the southwest comer of FOothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. APN: 229-011-10, 19, 21, and 26 through 28; and modify the definition of Automotive Service Couds. Pianning Commission recommends issuance Of a Negative Declaration, .,~ PAGE City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 I 0 OtIC~NANCE NO. 521 (second reading) 178 AN ~NANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNLA, APPf'<OV1NG INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02. AMENDING SUBAREA 7 TO ALLOW LIMITED COMMERCIAL AND TO MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF 'AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE COURT', AND MAKING RNDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2. CONSIDERAllON OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Development Code to implement transpodation control measure mandated by State and Federal Air Quality Regulations. This action is Categorically Exempt from environmental review per Section 15,308 of the CEQA Guidelines. ORDINANCE NO. 522 (second reading) 182 AN O{IOINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I~a~NCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APf:q~)V1NG DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-01, CHAPTERS 17.[]8,17.10AND 17.12 OF THE RANCHO CIJCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTI~AL AITcA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO NGA - Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Industrial Area Specific Plan to implement transpodation control measures mandated by State and Federal Air Quality Regulations. This action is Categorically Exempt from environmental review per Section 15,308 of the CEQA Guidefines. OIt~N,4J~E N0. 523 (second reading) 187 AN ~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAUFORNIA, APPf~)V1NG INI:XJ~RfAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING PARq' t11, REGARDING TRIP REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUF~ORT THEREOF ,~ PAGE City Council Agenda April 20, 1994 I 1 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIH.t3--~ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Sul:~niffecL G. PUBLIC HEARIN~-R The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT~ i The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDEI~ATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (CO 94-0161 ON 190 BOOKING FEES AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED LA~,~. ENFORCEMENT CONTT~ACT (CO 94-0171 WITH SAN BERNARDIN0 COUNTY (Itef~wcs tc:d:}lecl at Fe~16, 1994 meetbg, c:md is now I. COUNCIL BUSINESR The following Items have been requested by the CIty Council for discussion. They are not public hearing Items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input. 1. CONSIDERA11C)N Of: A RE,~::)LUT1ON IN OPPOSITION OF THE MOBILE 225 F~SOLUTION NO. 94-080 230 A RESI::)LUTION OE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CrTY OE RANClIO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE MOBILE HOME INI11ATIVE PAGE CIty Council Agende April 20, 1994 I 2 2. CONSIDFI~A11ON TO APPOINT COUNCIL I~EPI~ESENTAT1VE TO THF 23]. HISTO~C CULTUr~AL RESOUF,~:E MITIGATION TASK FORCF 3. UPDATE BY COUNCILMEMBEI~ BUQUET ON SCAG'S i~EGIONAJ ~ (Co~dinued fron~ Apdl 6. 19~4) J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This Is Ihe time for City Council to Identify the Items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIP, This Is the lime and place for the general public to address the CIty Council. Slale law prohibits the Clly Council from addressing any Issue not previously Included on Ihe Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matlet for s subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited Io five sinurea per individual. MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957,6 TO GIVE ROBERT DOMINGUEZ, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR, DIRECTION IN REGARDS TO THE MEET AND CONFER PROCESS WITH ALL CITY EMPLOYEE GROUPS. I, Debts J. Adarns, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga, hereby certify that a true, ~ccurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 14, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANCHO CUCARI LIST OF NARRANT~ FOR PERIOD: 03-30-9, 93/86) RUN DATE: 03130/96 PAGE: VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARRo ANT, II CMECKI OVERLAP 3785 ACTION ART RECREAYION SUPPLIES 850865 2,5i6,62 ((( 85087 - 85288 ))) I270 CHAPPEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FACILITY RENTAL 85289~ 25,000o00 8532 SIX FLAGS MAGIC MOUNTAIN RECREATION TICKETS 85290~ 384°00 12468 L,A,CoCoDo REGISTRATION FEE 8529i~ 35°00 (C( 85292 - 85293 >)> I J & A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO°l SMC° VEHICLE MAINTENANCEISUPPLZES 85296 59,31 211 A P I ALARN $YSYEN$ ALARM SERVICE 85295 35°00 2732 AEC LUCK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85296 TO,O0 7 ABLETRONIC5 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 85291 50o16 3468 ALL NELDZNG MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 85298 T85,00 3T66 AMERICAN HYDRAULICS MAINTENANCE REPAIR5 85299 376,35 26 ARBOR NURSER~ INC° MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 85300 639°62 26 A$SOCIATEO ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J 6530i lgTiT,50 26i6 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85302 65,40 1062 ANARDS BY CHAMPION ENGRAVED PLAQUE 85303 it55I°60 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE NARDMARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85304 126,i3 3227 BAYLESS STATIONERS OFFICE SUPPLIES I 85305 852,TT i338 BIG A AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE t 85306 i9i,27 i267 8LAKE PAPER CO,, INC° RECREATION SUPPLIES 85307 35,30 1081 BULZN NAINT° t JANZTORIALe JOHN JANITOR[AL SERVICES I 85308 14,923°00 39Ti C & S SCMMINN MONGOOSE MOUNTAIN BIKES 85309 6162T,32 85T C R G HEATING L AiR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE SERVICE 85310 156,00 6166 CAL COMP ROOFING REFUND BUILDING PERNITS 85311 320°00 3942 CAL MESTERN TERMITE PEST CONTROL MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE I 85312 210,00 93T CALCOMP [NC, MONTHLY SERVICE i 85313 302,00 6162 CAMEO FURNITURE MANUFACTURING REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE 85316 245,00 AEI CARE AMERICA HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL PREMIUM 85315 23,468°60 3622 CHARMER OP COMMERCE MONTHLY RENT 88316 200,00 74 CITY RENTALS EQUiPMENTRENTALISUPPLZE$ 85317 36,53 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 853X8 66,27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHQNGA · LIST OF NARRAHTS FOR PERIOD: 03-50-96 C93196) RUN DATE: 03130/94 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAHE [TEH DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARRo ANT, ~ CHECKA OVERLAP 500 HANSON ASSOCIATES. ZNCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85361 317o00 662 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO, EQUIPMENT NAINTENANCE R 85362 293.23 12667 HERRINGe ANDREA RENTAL CAR FEES 85363 353oT6 2069 HEYDEe DQNALO Lo ENSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 85366 23To50 3125 HI STANDARD AUTOHOTXVE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85365 316.16 3108 NINSON, KEITH NILEAGE REIHBURSENENT 85366 29.12 6150 HaLlOAT PRINTING PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE 8536T 10e210°35 1256 HOSENAN NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 85368 15°51 101 HQYT LUNBER CO., S.H. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 85369 53°80 695 NYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSt XNC LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R 85350 506o31 66 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 85351 673.83 92 INLAND VALLET DAILY BULLETIN SUOSCRSPTEON$ 85352 26.88 612 JAESCNKE INC., C.R° VEHZCLE NAZNTENANCE 8 85353 A68.1T 1829 JiP TELECOM INC. TELEPHONE SERVICES I 65356 181.12 IT9 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN HEDXCAL INSURANCE 65355 2583)0o39 12A66 KENNEDY9 HEATHER/VICTORIA DILLON RECREATION 8EPONO 85356 26°00 618T KINETSC PRESS NAENTENANCE 85357 163o90 IZIO KNOX NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 65358 ZT°ES 12065 KOOINANa TRUOT RECREATSON REPUND 85359 26°00 S18 KONN, HART HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R 85360 11~°81 12653 LAS 8RISAS RESORT HOTEL HOTEL REGISTRATION 8 85361 655.96 FDR PER[ODD 03-30-9 9318A) RUN DATE: 03/30/94 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEH DESCRIPTION MARR NO NARR. ANT. 85 CHE~KR OVERLAP 6527 SERFASS AND CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 85392 15.12 3717 SERVICE MERCHANDISE SUZPPLIES 85393 410o92 3276 SINCLAIR PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8539A 114o68 319 SO CALXF GAS CO. MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 85395 3m581o19 133 SO CALXF HUNZCXPAL ATHLETIC FEOeINC REGISTRATION 85396 11001.00 <<< 85397 - 65406 )>> 1AAZ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON NONTHLY ELECTRIC DILLS 0 85&OT 339967o7( 4192 $PAENiJRmMXLLZAN Vo C.EoRoTo ENSTRUCTOR 83406 ~87o50 322 $PARKLETT$ HONTHLY SERVICE 85609 37o00 646 STANDARO INSURANCE CO. INSURANCE PREMIUM 85410 107.50 23A~ TARGET YOUTH PRODRAN C DAY CAMP SUPPL 85411 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS HAINT SUPPLIES I 63~11 6TADTO 1151 TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 85'13 245°00 852228 TECON PACIFIC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 05416 9Ao29 8529 TEKNDSYSt XNCo SUBSCRIPTZONS 85415 IZOoOO 1262 TELEQUE$TION$ EVALUATION TELECOMH EQUIPHENT 88~16 500°00 3371 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLYe INCo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 85417 ~89 UPLANOe CITY OF MONTHLY MATER OILLEND 85418 168.~6 2868 MALL STREET JOURNAL SUBSCRZPTEON 85419 1~9o00 2213 MAXlee KLEEN-LINE CORP RAINY SUPPLIES i 03~20 19632o522 AT? MEST PUBLISHING CO PUBLICATIONS 03421 224°80 774 MESTEK COMPUTER SERVICES; XNC COMPUTER SERVICE 85423' I00o60 8530 NESTERN METAL DECORATENOt CD. BUSINESS LTCENSE REFUNDS 85423 31o222 ~941 MESTERN TURF A COMMERCIAL MAINT SUPPLIES I 05~2A 249.95 212 HALLOAN ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES · 856225 3t077,50 22901 MDLPEe OUANE L, ZNSTRUCTDR PAYMENT 85426 100,00 96 MOLPZNIARGER INC. e 0iF, LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 05422Y 106o96 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY NACHENE $UPPLXESISERVECE I 88428 8531 YMCA NONEH RCHIEVEMENTRECOGN NTG RSA29 AOoOO 3Yl ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE RECREATION SUPPLIES 05(30 1~6.00 840 ZEP HANUFACTURZNG GOHPANY VEHICLE RAINY SUPPLIES I 83631 22TI,40 · $ TOTAL 2522,309o77 FOR PERIOD1 04-06-E4 CAD/tAB VENDOR memo eO CUECAR OVERLAP 1487 PARC OAKLAND SERS(NTULT NT6 STATE lOP) I 84SiRe 8.69- ((C 14Kit - 845ZW 8487 PARC OAKLAND SENS(NTHLT NTG STATe BOP) 845308 8o6W ((( 84531 - 8PASS 3093 STATE OP CALZFODNZA REfeR CPA LICENSE ee43ze zooooo ((( 854S3 - 15ASK S A L A EQUIPFlEET RENTALS CO, e ENC, VEHICLE NAIUTENADCE/SUPPLIeS e 15436 e ARC.go OFFICE SUPPLIES OPPZCE SUPFLOES I OK48T IZ8o84 .4i98 AOVANCED COLOn GRAPHECS OFFICE SUPPLZES 85438 1Z3,66 IT ALTA Fine EQUIPRENT CO, SOlViCE/SUPPLIES 85439 101o85 1430 AHERZCAN BUSINESS FORDS OFFICE SUPPLIES 85440 ZeZTZoTZ Z6 ASSOCIATeO eNGINEERS PROFESSIONAL senvices I 8s~l 6,Dll.oo 2437 ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPEISe lNC, fONTeLY fAINTgRANGe SlITICE 8e4~2 lenin.31 2616 AUTO PARTS CONPANTo INC VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLieS O IS448 830o5Z 457 C i e LUNBER CO NAXNTeNANCE SUPPLIES e 15444 584°72 9T C P R S SUOSCEZPTION IKA~e BT C P R S SUBSCRIPTION OK446 50o00 Z85i CAL NESTERE PAINT RAZNTeNANCE SUPPLIES 85~,T SeAOAoe4 3942 CAL UESTERN TERNZTE PEST CONTROL fONTFILE PEST CONTROL SOlViCE I IS/~8 235,00 SBO! CANOE PACXPZC CORPODATZON fAINTCHANCe/VEHICLE SUPPLIES I 80~40 686.s6 69 CENTIAL CZTZES SIGN SeDVZCE NAZNTeRANCE SUPPLIES I 35450 Se630,SO TS CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIOj INC, VEHICLE NAZNTENAUCe/SUPPLIES I 85451 364.85 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY VEHICLE NAIUTENANCE SUPPLIES I 8SASZ 032.64 826 CORPUTERVISZON CORPORATION NONTHLT NAZNTENANCE SOlVICE 8SAID z07.75 AiRS CONSOLIOATeD HASTE INOUSTRIeS HASTE DISPOSAL 85454 BTO,O0 3SEW CONTINENTAL SAFETY SUPPLY fAINT SUPPLIES 85455 LJSTB.20 25T2 CONTROL lOON, THE CITY PHOTOS 85456 650,00 ((( IKABT - ISASI 85 CUCAHONGA CO MATER DIST NONTHLT NATEl IILLZNGS I 85458 294 ORISV NUEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICe SUPPLIES I IKAS9 239.Z1 35~ DANZELS TIRE SEDVZCE VEHICLE fAINTCRANE & SUPPLIES e 85460 944°06 3608 DEALERS AUTO TRIN VEHICLE NAIDTENANCE 85/~3 SO0oO0 lOT DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES i RS~6Z 48,10 839 OZETEOZCN iNTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE fAINTgRANGE e0463 49.95 52K EASTMANe INC OFFICe SUPPLIES B AS464 i86o05 3614 ELITE TORZNG TOUING GelViCE 85465 1ZOO0 IZSI ELLZSe JAVA REIN8 POD BUS, IELATeO IXPEDSE 85466 Z8o04 406I ENPIIE FORD VEHICLE DAENTENANCE i IS~6T iBO,e5 3707 ESGIL CORPORATION PLAN CHECK 85468 ZiZl PAII°S - IANCHO CUCANONGA OFFiCe SUPPLZES IS469 IZS4 GeneRAL BINDinG CORPORATION fAINTgRANGE SUPPLIES 8SATO 6SO GRAiNGent URN, HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 85471 T44 GREAT NESTERE SAVINGS DEFERRED CONP ISATZ 5BAWE.OQ I~O0 GRiPPiTH RADIATOR SALES VEHiCLe NAZNTENANCE · 85473 SODSO IST GTe CALZFODNEA NONTHLT TELEPHONE BiLLiNGS I 854T4 liTDiS lZ4TO HEALTH GROUP PSYCHOLOGICAL SVCS,ZNC BUSINESS LZCENSE IEPUND 15475 5.S0 8ZO HEARD PoH. Oo, BOUARO iNSTRUCTOR PET ISATB ZD,O0 ZSZ9 HECKETT SLAG PRODUCTS fAINTgRANGE SUPPLIES 85477 lioOZ ~): "QPPER'S OFFICE FURNiTURe OFFICE SUPPLIES 85478 Z03.65 HOSENAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES J 85479 36)4 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDNG CONTRACT R~&nO CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAHDNGA LIST OF UARBANTS fOR PERIOD; 04-0&-04 000/04) RUN OATE~ 04/06/D4 VENDOR NAME ITEM ODSCBIPTTQN WARM NO NAMED ANT. T6~ HOVT LUMBER CO., S.N. NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 00400 lZZ.OS 490 NTORO-SCRPD PRODUCTS, iNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES R OS4II IS.6S- Ti4T4 ICBO-SAN DIEGO AREA CHAPYES ZDD4 MEMBERSHIP R9403 2SoOO 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT ~" .~ MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES R 00484 454°68 2956 ZNOUSTRZAL DRUSfi CORPORATION NAZNTENANCE SUPPLZIS IS48E 497°80 12~35 INLAND EMPIRE HANAGEReS ASSOC, NEHBERSHSP DUES 00486 ZO.O0 4008 INNOVATIVE SPORTS DESIGN DEPOSIT FOR SPORTS EOUZPMENT 0540T 538°75 4062 ZNTDRNATIQNAL IMAGES MONTHLY RENTAL FEE 85408 456°00 612 JRESCH·E INC,~ C,0o VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 0 85419 S,T43,30 TROT JOHNSON CQNPAMVm R,P, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85490 1,24So20 23R6 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES D BS4DS 546.12 TZTa KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 0 05492 165o91 1024 KOCH MATERIALS CQMPAMV MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES IS493 71o12 IgS LANCE, TOLL & LUNGHARO AUDIT SERVSCES 85494 R,4OloOO 849 LRNSQN PRODUCTS, ZNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLZES D DS49S SET.JR Ii4T2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT SNSTZTUVE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 0D496 114.08 4178 LONCAE, PHIL Cue./,T, INSTRUCTOR 0E49T tO0.OO 600 LYNCH, JANIE RECREATION SUPPLIES 15400 SO.OO 12469 MATTRESS OUTLET BUSZNESS LICENSE REPUND 05499 108.70 3015 MC CALL, SUSAN INSTINCTOR PAYMENT IS~O0 1025 NC HASTEN-CARE SUPPLY COMPANY HAZNTEMANCE SUPPLIES iDSOa 1,21To43 4090 MEZ/NZCRO CENTER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RIGOR 134.59 12413 NEECURT XNSUEANCE AS A $UBEDGEE CLAZH SETTLEMENT RS50S T26.AS T49 NIJAC ALARM COMPANY ALARM SERVICES 0 05504 414o00 403 NORTON COATINGS, ZNC, - DAUER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BSSQS 889.19 3316 MR, T'S 24-HRo TOMlEG TQMZNG 0 85506 80°00 2148 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHZCLE MAINTENANCE 0 OSSOT 519.67 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVZCE UNIFORM SERVICES 0 DSSOS i,206.80 T24T! NETNORM PHARMACY BUSXWeS$ LICENSE REFUND lSMR 16o24 433 NEXQN-EGLI EQUZPHEUT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ISSJD 2~6.02 . ((( DSSIT- 15512 309 Q C 0 BEPEQGNRPHECS, iNC NETRQLINK 0 aiSle 6T ON-CALL COMMUNICATIONS MONTHLY SERVICES DDSi4 34,23 2410 QMTAEZQ, CZTV Of QUARTERLY BILLING MiStS 3i,6TYo60 1026 PACTEL CELLULAR CELLULAR PHONE IILLZNGS E 05816 165o27 3716 PARNA NEHDBRSHIP 'BENEMIL RSSIT SQ.O0 3173 PELTlEE, TAHNV RECiEATIQN SUPPLIES 85518 200.00 2ST POMA DZSTEIBUTING CO VEHICLE NAZNVEMAMCE i SUPPLIES m 055~$ 6,00T,40 8536 PQMEE DISTRIBUTORSm INCo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 85520 23.R0 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL MEDZCAL/OXSABZLZTY INSURANCE DES22 660808,26 6E PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 85522 2105 I.H.P., ZMC. VEHICLE NAINT SEIVICELSUPPLIES I 85523 320.38 626 IAULS TIUCK TIRE SERVICE- TIRE IEPAZl I 80524 109.00 Slit RE-PlANT CORPORATION OPPICE.SUPPLZES - ISleS 94°80 545 'RIO NING.SHQE STOle SAFETY BOOTS 85526 ~46.54 216 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS · ITS2/ 10950,76 4140 ROAD MACHINERYe iNCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLZRS · 35528 leSRT.25 3314 ROBINSON PEITILIEE/ LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES E lEST9 10422.52 DEVELQPMENT, INC. OUSTNEST LICENSE REFUND; BSSST 47°50 2084 TNSo COo GROUP ADNINo N~DICAL INSURANCE 85532 76.6~ CITY OP RANCNU LIST DP MARRANTS PER PERIODS OA-GS'-5G · mmm ~m~m~mm~m~m~mm~m~mm~m~m~mmmm~mmm~mm~mm~mmf~mmm~mm~mR~ ~ATE{ 04/06/94 PAGES ,eNo~ .NANE ' ITCH OES' ' ' """"""""""""""""'* .--------------,-------------------.............. ,. ~ ~: ! l::_ ................,..:::: .' ~......... ~:: ::.: :~:..............,..... ~ CHECRB OVERLAP STI SAN BERN CO OFFICE QF HNGNNT JVC TELEPRQCESSZNG SERVICES 85535 286.00 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERZPFS SERVICE R 85536 631~SYO.OQ 216 SAN BERNCQ SOLID UASTE NGHENT NQNTHLT SERVICE RSSSS Zm363.08 SOD SAN BERNARDINQ COUNTY REEKS PARKING CITAT2QNS ESS86 635.00 981 SAN BERNARDEND CUUNTT CAL-IO PRDGRAH 85531 132 SAN OIEGQ ROTARY 0800H CQm ZNC MAENT SUPPLIES 85538 258o60 3896 SENECHALm CAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 0 85939 180o50 351 SIGN SNQPm THE HAIRY SUPPLIES 85540 3216 SINCLAIR PA2NT NAB NTENANCB SUPPL2ES 85S~1 81.26 319 SQ CALZP GAS CO, NQHTHLT GAS BILLS R 85542 ((( 85563.- 15546 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS e 85545 Zm286.96 4125 SPENCER t ASSOCIATES REHAB PROGRAM 85546 315.00 646 STANDARD INSURANCE COo INSURANCE PREMIUM 85547 575.10 8512 SUNNXT BUILDERS OEPOSZT REFUNO 95548 lmOOO.OO Z346 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAN 8 DAY CANP SUPPL 855~9 61.63 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS HAENT SUPPLIES 8 85550 1m480.68 4136 TECHPEQ SENIRA! i TRAINING ESSSZ ZSQ.BQ 1974 TRAFFIC SPECIALTIES TRAFFIC SUPPLIES d ISSSZ Iz,ezs.2z 3993 TREMCO ROOFING SERVICe 85553 8QO.Q4 9535 TROPICAL SEAFOOD & NEAT NKTm XNCo BUSINESS LZCENSE REFUND 65554 1~538.85 3&Z2 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFPICE SUPPLIES 85555 4,55 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) MONTHLY VISION SEnVICE NILLING 85556 6mQ~T.OZ 23&0 VORTEX INDUSTRIES NAZNT SERVICE 6 REPAIRS RSSST · Y8 UARREN & CO.m CARL LZABILZTT CLAIMS 85558 370.60 213 NAXZEe KLeIN-LINE CORP NAZNT SUPPL2ES 0 85559 810o63 411 NESTBURNE PIPE 6 SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 85560 303°86 Z6T NESTERR ROCK CO ASPHALT 6 CONCRETE I 8356s 665°00 ee TOTAL 8308255o59 AVERAGE ---YIELD TO ltTL~ZTY--- IRVESTUENTS BOOR VALUE PCRIF8~IO TERR NAIURIEY EQUIVALENT EGSIV&ENT ~nNTN ENBIIIG FISCAL TQIAL EARNINGS PARCH 3l VEM TO DAIE ~: Current Year I 132~635.0t I I,Q96,319.4B .~!~ , ~ ................. I cert~ty that this report accurately riflKts all alehey pooled invht~ts and ~ 041~5/~9941 CITY DF kAt~HO CUCAI~DNGA PH - INVESTRENT PORIFQLZO DETAILS - INVEST~NTS CiTY H410511994 CITY Of P, APZHD CUC[HHHGA pII - 4 IAVESIElil pORI[OLIG DEIAILS - CASH Cl(V 0410BIIS94 CITY BE RANCHO CUCAUUAGA P~ ' 5 POBTTRLIDP, ASTER INVERTNEd1 ACTIVITY BY TYPE C][Y STATED TRABBACTZBN PURCHASES BALESIHAT~[TIER TYPE [BUESI~ENT I ZSSREB RATE SATE OR DEPOBZTB OR M]IHDRA~LD 8ALANKE CCRTZF[CAIEB GF BEPBSiT - BANC BEGINNING BNLAliCE: 15~BI9tSBH.50 QUBBO BANK OF AHERICA 2.150 OSI221~A 1,791,645.50 a O~OR~ BANK OF AHENICA 2.250 O]121194 127~921.00 OHBBP BANK OF ~ERICB 2.250 OTI21/~'l i27~21.OO TREASHBY BECU~iTZEB - SISCOUNT BE6ZNII[N6 9NKNICE; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Me~aers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBjECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ANO EIGHTH STREET FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. 5'TPLNHG-5420(O03), TO BE FUNDED FROM FAU STREETS, ACCOUNT NO. 24-4637-8914 P, ECOIIF_XDATION: It is recon~ended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street, Federal Aid Project No. STPLNHG-5420(O03), and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been coal eted by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $120,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, 1994, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 17, 1994. Respectfully submitted, - Wil liam J. il City Engin WJO:LB:sd Attachment Purchasing TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET VICINITY MAP A ARROW ROUTE NINTH ST. EIGHTH ST LOCATION MAP RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNqONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET FEDERAL AID PROJECT NO. STPLNHG-5420(O03)", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO AOVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Archibald Avenue and Eighth Street." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and speci fications, which said advertisement shal 1 be substantial ly in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSAJ. S" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.lq. on TUESDAY, MAY 17, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for "THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET" in said City. A prebid meeting is scheduled for 10:00, TUESDAY MAY 3, 1994, at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Engineering Division. This meeting is to inform DBEs of subcontracting and material supply opportunities. Bidder's attendance at this meeting is e prerequisite for demonstrating reasonable effort to obtain DBE participation; however, if the DBE goal is mot, attendance is not required. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided 'for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAcETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 8TH STREET." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles I 15 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rata of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not mare than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesman in any apprenttcable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship cona~ittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to Journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship conmittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the gO days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the nu~er of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can shoo that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its memerslaip through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he ~ploys registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenttcable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the 1G requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter i, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work heroinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor mere than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashter's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamenga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10S of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shal 1 be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which mey be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamenga. 17 Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Profes- sions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamenga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this ZOth day of April 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this ZOth day of April 1994. Mayor ATTEST: Clty ClerR ADVERTISE ON: April 26 and May 3, 1994 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wil? jam J. O'Netl, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX, ACCOUNT NO. 09-4636-9211 RECOMENDATIOM: It is recontmended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Right Turn Lane at Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting ~ids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $110,861.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, 1994, with the 5td opening at ~:00 PM on Tuesday, May 10, 1994. Respectfully submitted, Will jam J. Oetl~~ City Engineer t~JO:LRB:Sd Attachment RIGHT-TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD LOCATION MAP RESOLUTION NO. d~/~ ~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Right Turn Lane at Archibald Avenue and Base Line Road." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shal 1 be substantial ly in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga~ on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on TUESDAY MAY 10, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the '*RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamunga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of RIGHT TURN LANE AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD." PREVAILI~ WADE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to PaY not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamunga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to a~ interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such 21 determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not mere than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesman in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship conmittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the numper of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can shoo that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its mempership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeyman. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he c~ploys registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777,5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenti.ceship standards, wage schedules, and other require,ants may be obtained from the-Director of Industrial relations, ex-officto the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workman employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor mere than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamenga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamenga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Profes- sions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamenga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamenga, California, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Concil of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, California. Dated this 20th day of April 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 20th day of April 1994. )sayor ATTEST: City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: April 26 and May 3, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Book, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM ~420 FEET WEST OF LOCUST AVENUE TO ~1250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AVENUE, TO BE FUNDED FROM GAS TAX, ACCOUNT NO. 09-4637-9209 I~CI)!!~MDATI011: It is recommended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Hlghl and Avenue Improvement Project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the Ctty Engi neer. The Engineer ' s estimate for construction is $56,327.01. Legal advertising is scheduled for April 26 and May 3, 1994, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, May 10, 1994. Respectful 1 y submitted, Will lain J. O'Netl City Engineer WJO:L~:Sd Attachment HIGHLAND AVENUE +420' WEST OF LOCUST TO +1250' EAST OF LOCUST ;'A~'~ ~T. I pllllTl FUTUF E FOOTHILL FWY ///~~ , ,_--_. HIGHLAND AVE. m ,~ , r,,,,, - > ~ ~TORIA PK LN. VICTORIA S.P.R .R. FOOTHILL ~' BLVO . LOCATION MAP RESOLUTION NO. ~/~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR "HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM 5420 FEET WEST OF LOCUST AVENUE TO 51250 FEET EAST OF LOCUST AVENUE", IN SAID CII'Y AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamenga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamenga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain t~rovements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamenga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Highland Avenue from 5420 feet west of Locust Avenue to 51250 feet east of Locust Avenue." BE IT FlIRTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shal 1 be substantial ly in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEAJ. ED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamenga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the "Highland Avenue from 5420' west of Locust Avenue to 51250' east of Locust Avenue" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamenga, California 91730. Bids mast be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Highland Avenue from 5420' west of Locust Avenue to 51250' east of Locust Avenue." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Co<le, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay no~ less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the Job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by aqy subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the en~oloyment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in a~y apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship comnittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemplojnnent in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship con~tttee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the nunfaer of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its me~ershlp through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is requirc~ to make contributions to funds estebl tshed for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 tn the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officto the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Cede. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Cede Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful perfornmnce of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said werk shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him a~ the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be perlonged under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Cede, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is' to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ~eserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 20th day of April 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 20th day of April 1994. N~,yor ATTEST: City Cler~ ADVERTISE ON: April 26 and May 3, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT , ' DATE: April 20, 1994 ~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Joan Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: REQUEST TO TRANSFER CITY VEHICLE Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the transfer of a City vehicle to fadlitate its use by the County of San Bernardino in the Police Department's Bicycle Patrol Program. Through the use of "asset seizure" funds, the Police Department has purchased through the City of Rancho Cucamonga an extended bed van for use by Bicycle Patrol. This vehicle will enable the transfer of the Bicycle Patrol Officers and their bikes to any point within the City for immediate dispatch and patrol. In order for the vehicle to be used by County Deputies, and to be striped using standard Police Department striping provided by the County, the vehicle must be transferred to the County of San Bernardino. Once transferred, the vehicle will become the property of the County of San Bernardino and will be available for use by the Police Department. Responsibility for liability, maintenance, and fuel will be the same as that provided for other vehicles within the Police Department's fleet. At the end of its useful life, title to this van will be transferred back to the City for $1.00. The vehicle to be transferred is described as follows: 1994 Ford Extended Body Van ID #1FTJS34HXRHB01190 Respectfully submitted, /t~dministrative Services Director RCD/dah 31 CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA STAFF RE PORT "'*-; DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council '!~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director SUBJECT: REQUEST BY RANCHO SAN ANTONIO MEDICAL CENTER TO WAIVE CITY FEES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE "HEALTHY KIDS" DAY EVENT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends waiving City fees in conjunction with the "Healthy Kids Day" program. BACKGROUND: Rancho San Antonio Medical Center and the YMCA'S of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland, are sponsoring an international "Y- event called "Healthy Kids Day". The event is designed to provide information and education of health and safety issues for children in the community ages 4 to 12. This event is open to the public and there is no charge to participate. The City has received a request from Carolyn Anderson, Marketing Manager, Rancho San Antonio Medical Center, to waive City fees in connection with "Healthy Kids Day" program on Saturday, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (see attached letter). The specific fee to be waived is: Planning Department Temporary Use Permit $68.00 Banner Permit 51.00 ~in TOTAL $119.00 Re clf mitted, t Dlr ctor s/is ,ttach~nent ~ rY 0 ~I~CEIVED F RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 7, 1994 ~ T'YCI==k, Jan Sutton APR 11 1994 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 ~'~"' ~t~i=~l:21 ~' 2~314_[5~6J Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho San Antonio Medical Center Dear Ms. Sutton: Please place me on the April 20, 1994 City Council agenda. I will be requesting the Council waive permit fees for the "Healthy Kids Day" program. Rancho San Antonio Medical Center and the YMCA's of Rancho Cucamonga and Upland, are sponsoring an international "Y' event called 'Healthy Kids Day'. The event is designed to provide information and education of health and safety issues for children aged 4 to 12. This event is open to the public and there is no charge to participate. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires permit fees of $169.00 for a temporary use permit, permit to display a banner, and tent permits. The program is held on Saturday from 10:00 am to 3:00pro. Tents will be constructed on Friday evening and dismanfied on Saturday evening. Additional costs are incurred for an inspector to approve the tents, as the Fire Inspector is off on Friday and overtime pay is required. All of the sponsors for 'Healthy Kids Day" are non-profit and there is no charge associated with public or vendor participation, therefore I respectfully request the pe.ait fees be waived. If you have any questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to call me at (909) 948- 8094. Carolyn£ Marketfn ~ Mariaglut 7777-A Milliken Ave. · Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 · (714) 948-8000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: TEMPORARY VARIANCE OF SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING AT HERITAGE PARK FROM JULY 5 - 30, 1994 RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends approval of a temporary variance for sports field lights at Heritage Park senior field. Alta Loma Little League is requesting this light variance from July 5- 30, 1994, excluding usage for July 17 and 19, to host the Junior League Tournament. BACKGROUND The current sports field light curfew is 10:00 p.m. Similar tournaments have been hosted over the past several years. Since this tournament is for older boys, play traditionally lasts 2.5 to 3 hours. In recent years, the City Council and Park and Recreation Commission have approved a curfew variance only for overtime play in hopes that most games would be completed within the stated curfew. ANALYSIS The Park and Recreation Commission reviewed this request at their March 17, 1994 meeting. The variance would apply to only the 90' field located on the east side of Heritage Park. No other game site is used. Alta Loma Little League has been asked to host this tournament at its home venue. In keeping with past policy, the Park and Recreation Commission and staff recommend that game times be moved forward so extended light use is available only in overtime situations. Therefore, the Commission recommends start times of 5:00 p.m. and 7:30 p.m. on two game nights and 6:00 p.m. on single game nights. CITY COUNCILMEETING TEMPORARy VARIANCE OF SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING April 20, 1994 Page 2 The Commission also recommends that the tournament exclude July 17 and July 19 from usage as those dates have been scheduled for local equestrian club activities. As in the past, the Little League will need to notify neighbors within one block of the park, provide the City a tournament bracket one week prior, and supply the necessary comprehensive liability insurance coverage. ~spectfully subm~ ~es Manager S0/kls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution 91-012-P extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BACKGROUND The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to ensure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. Respectfully submjtted, Susan Mickey Management Analyst I SM:dk Attachment RESOI/31~ON NO. 91-012-P A RESOI/gF/ON OF THE c~'l~ COUNCIL OF THE c1'1~ OF RAN(~{O COCA~r~r.~, CALIFO~r/A, EXI'k/~3ING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRAN(}IISE 'LICenSE WI'I~ OCMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS ~ EXPIP~ON OF C~ T.TC~SE W£'I~ ~}{E C£'IY OF ~REAS, the Franchise Licer~se 9L~nted to Ccancast e~h_le T.V. by the County of San Berna~ and grandfathered into the City of Rancho Cucam~ will ex~ire on April 22, 1994; and M~EREAS, negotiations are cnc3oing be~ the City of Rancho Or~r~ga and Cubcast c~hle T.V.; and WH]~d~AS, all terms and conditions of the current lioense will continue the same. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Oacamcnga does hereby resolve to extend the Pra~ License for 90 days ~ the expiratic~ of tha current County of San Ber~ License. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA "- STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: City Council FROM: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk]Records Manager BY: Sh~'l Griffin, Records Clerk SUB~CT: DESTRUCTION OF CITY DOCUMENTS It is recommended that City Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). BUILDING & SAFETY COMMUNITY SERVICES ENGINEERING TRAFFIC/DESIGN FINANCE FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL PURCHASING REDEVELOPEMENT AGENCY RISK MANAGEMENT Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under their charge as long as such destruction is tirst approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Also under Government Code Section 34090, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/sg attachment(s) A RESOLUi~ON OF ~HE ~I'AY OZ~qCIL OF THE UA'AY OF ~ (33CAI~DNC~, CALII~C~qIA, ~ZM ~ D~I'I~ OF ~ ~ ~ ~ ~E ~1'1~ 34~0 ~e of ~ foll~ Ci~ ~~ ~e ~ 1~ r~ f~ ~lic ~ ~D~ & ~'~ P~ ~, it ~ ~ d~ ~t ~im of ~ ~ t~, ~, ~ ~ion ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~lic; ~ ~, ~i~ 34090 of ~ ~ ~ of ~ ~ of ~l~a a~orizs ~e h~d of a Ci~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ci~ ~ ~ d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ old ~er ~ ~ ~ ~e, ~1 of ~e Ci~ ~il ~ ~l~i~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~ of ~ Ci~ A~; ~ ~, it ~ ~ ~le ~ ~ ~d ~,~ ~ 1~ ~ ~it "A" a~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~f, ~ ~, ~ ~ a ~ ~f, ~ ~ ~ ~ y~ old; ~ ~, ~d ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ ~~ ~ ~ Ci~ A~. ~, ~, ~ Ci~ ~il of ~ Ci~ of ~ O~ ~ ~ ~1~ s folly: d~ ~ ~ H~ ~ ~it "A" a~ ~-~ ~ ~ a ~ E~ 2: ~t ~ Ci~ Cl~k ~ a~iz~ ~ ~1~ ~m~ ~ ~ ~tion ~ ~ ~~ of ~1 ~ll~i~ of ~ ~i~ ~d~ n~:,,~, ~i~ of ~lif~, ~ ~ ~i~ ~i~ ~i~ ~ ~ Ci~ ~il, ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~it "A" ~i~tial. ~: ~t ~ Ci~ Ci~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~m of ~ ~f~. RECEIVED :: 7Y ':F ~;.%;~C C:CAYC~JGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -.~:. ,. ,=~:-- DEC 0 9 1993 5332 ~Y~ERWCC: - S3-2U~ ........ 25/2e/93 ' ..... ~ ..... 35/2~/93 93-22:93-22~2 ~,/~/c~ 3572Lt93 ............. C:/23/93 '2'C9 ~ENA, 9:-20'5 92-559~. 92-55~'.. 92-5255.92-5257 2L/23/93 ~5/2~/93 LET,ERS, MEMOS AND CCR 9!/~1,'91 jERRY GRANT '.CX.~: :URTZi 2'/2!19' :2/39/9! R:CK GOMEZ :I/C'/? '212S./9' ~v ~: 3ANnun .,-rA~nNeA ~ - D ................... (~JTY OF RANCHO C ': ',s: ':: ~3:'e: 1993 -':E ::'.::,.,:,,: :E::R~S .,~s SC.~EOU~E: =O~ CEE'~:'::" '_~.~SE :~::'.':~TEDEC O 9 "::R 3:5o18:,:0~ TH~N ~E~'.'RN ~H!S RE,DR~. 513~D. '0 ':-f ,~,:~=~:~ .... ,,'~ .... ".~. ~s-~:~ "-"~: ':~"~ ~s: :.,:-:~ ~,~ 'x' =~, 17181~i~,,.,,:,. ,i~siqlsl~j ' ~"'~':;?="%'~ ,'~Pi) :~ ':~' v~,~c* ~Av iS ':~' : ':~ ':Y 'b~E: ~UZLQZNG & 5AF~~'' :[V ~A~L 59~T: aYCN5: 'X~ :u:~' ~OX "'~":~"= ::a,NN,Na :~.~=~,c ~OX Nn =-:--- ~ ? '=v ~ARTZ'Z n~/~' !2/30/9' ::'dar ~ ~ aH]L ~CSL5Y ~'/~!/9! '2/3e/9! calder: 9 ~ARY NADE~: ::,;:!/~1 ::~er; '2 Z:~ SCH~CE3E~ ?/21/91 Fsl~r ~ 15 SCUD Ci/~I/~' !2/30/9! c*ue~ ~ ',~ SENE~AL. C~RESPSNDENCE ~ ~,~/o, !2/30/gi ::'der; ~* SA~LOS SIL'/A ?/~!t9! !2130/9! :ci~er; 2! ~U,HOR!ZATZON '0 3S'AiN CI/Ol/9! !2/30/9! ::'de~ ~ ~ EYP'.OYEES ~EOUEST FOR LSAVE 31/n~/9~ Fs!~ar * ~ cAN ocRNARp,N~ ~nJi,lTv PERC. RcoAR~: ~/n,/g, 12/30/9! gnn,c,~,AT,nNS Fs~ar * 2: CODE V'.m. ATICNS LETTERS n,/n%,a, ......... 2/3./9. Fs'der ~ 2S 9LAN CHEC< SEENSIgN & EXPIRATION LETTERS 9'/0!/9! !2/30/91 :-~*- ~ 21 '**~ - "~N: AN~ "' _ nc~ 199! C:/~!/9! 12130/9~ D %AN CHECX & PERMIT CORRESPONO 01/0!/9! :2/30/91 S02 0{-03-03 2 !2-!993 :-!~r ~ FIRST RECHE~ '=rw=RS JAN - n:~ !c~, n.~n!/o, '~/~/o, =s!,~er ~ 2 SECOND RECHECK LETTERS JAN - 25C. i~9' 21,/3!,,'9! 12130/9! 2 SUPPORT:~SG DOUCME,NTS FOR °cR~mt n!/n~/gn "V~nlg :'!~ '" EUPoDRTING DCCU~ENTATICN FOR FiNALED cslden ~ 2 APPL:CAT!ONS FOR TEMPORARY OCCUP~NC~ O!/O!/gO !2/3C/90 F:!der Z ~ TRACTS: 9399-9400 Ci/~!/gO 12/30/90 '~' 2 "?~l~___/___ ,' ............................ Oa:e: 3a:a: ASS'. ::-v ATTORNEY C:T"' 3F 3as:ru::::: ~1 ........... ~s:crt ' O"JCAMONGA qSE. : ::'E: ':~:-: '::-:3:s': DEC 0 9 1993 -u£ ::'__Z":':~ ::"':~'"- ',~E 2'Cu~:'j:__:: c:~ DE~'ZL:':':3': '_~:.:E ,. -_ .l E:S::E':. _ "E :c-,,:-_': .......... : .... E ., -:~ - - 2E;T : ,~o ':r .2..,p: :,' "'S & ~_AF£''~ ::V ?;' '.'SR': 7u-I,c. '~::-:9'32-~':' :~' .... '; ...... :,E'::_:"/'-L Z:',< ......................... 5CX %'. """~' -a:x '2-':~j, '*': :""- ': : '~ATE: '%:." --..n. ,q~ '2/3':.'% ':':~:sr '- ~-%"C'S: "':': :' 7"C2 "~"3~':* ::!:.? ~ :'-'%L:":': ":'2~ :/:1/9C ::'~-~': '= '~""': '~:~'~ :'/2!/90 '2/32/93 :c :at ,* :5 ~:,C'S: '25'2 2',,S!/90 '2,n,C/9," =:.'ca': " '~-*C'~: '?~E': :','C',".'C '2,"3:,/% '~AS': 't~C': 'Z?3S :',"2'/~3 '2/20190 TRACT: !2~3e TRACT: TRACT: 1355~ ~',2'./i: '2/33/90 'tACT: '1~2 ~' '2'.'¢0 '2'32/90 '~C': ;~7"" ....~:7 .... -,, FY RECEIVED CITY OF RANCHO C~CA,'4,CNGA OFR/~ . . KCAMONGA DEC 0 9 1993 7:'E :: .LC',*':';~ ~ECCRDS ARE =nucn, rl =n ' ..... N ~,E'URN "u~c ~ERCR'. ="'~'~' "' '~,~"'tAGEvE~' ::V:S:2: ': ._~. '~ET.~:~J TH':EE ',:~-: .y,~ .='~- ~,A,.=. :," '~; X :,:'ES '~ER'~'~ENT ~ECORD CTR. 3E,i'RCY RE'R[EI/~L ~CX "s'~r t' '~ =':.~C": 13e22 ::,'C!/g.'3 :2/79197 ::'de;' ~z 29 ~RACT: !2m44. 2:12!/99 12139199 -'::!.'a": 2: :*RACT: !3.'JEe 9:!7197 ~2/3O/gC ~-'-'o- '* ~ TRACT: "~'~¢'f :c~da:' ~ 27 '~RACT: !~59~-2 C:/O!IgC '.2/39/g9 Fc~de." ~: 2~. TRACT: 12939 01101190 12t3g199 Fc:de:' ~ 25 TRACT: :3552 ,~!19!190 12/33/9e F:Tda" ~: '~ TRACT: w,':, "C de'" 29 TRACT: !~"= ~t~ig~ Fc!der ~z '>o TRA~'~. ~]nco n~/n, lgn 12139199 .-':%'jet' =3~ "RACT: !g~C! gVO!/gO !2/30/g0 Fc~r:s~ ~ ~' TRACT: '.!~95-3 91101199 :2139/99 cc:,,de," ~ 32 TRACT: 12944 cc~d,_:' -* 37 TRAC': '.~E53 OIIC!/gg 12130/90 ::'der ~ ~° 'RACT: '°~'2 ~'/n~/gn !2130190 =c~ce.. :t 35 TR,~C': 13!I? ".!/..C!/g~ !2/3~/90 Fs:,~a:' ~ ':*~ '~tA""- '~=~* 3!/,,.!/90 !2/30/90 cc!da? *, ~ ~'RAST: 13022 C!/OI/g0 12130190 Folder; 78 TRACT: !Oe2?-! 0!/91/90 !2/30/g0 Date: ASS', CITY ATTORNEY =' ~mL: 90XES ON gOXES NEEglNG TO BE RETURNEO FOR 9ESTRUCTION ~CXES '~ :~ gESTROYE~/~*^~"~='" these which must be RETURNEO 1 OF 6, 01- !994 THE FOLLOWING BUILDING AND SAFETY DOCUMENTS: BUILDING PLANS - NON- RETAINED INCL. (RECORD TITLE CODE: 8040.2) ARE DUE FOR DESTRUCTION. UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090, DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS; EXCEPTED RECORDS; CONSTRUCTION -- THESE RECORDS b lAY NOW BE DESTROYED. DATE~ OF DOC=M~NTS: Beginning 8/31/89 Ending 8/2.9~ TRACT (13442) SINGLE ~A/~ILY RESIDENCES TRACT PLaN ~13442) SINGLE FA/~ILY OWELLINGS LOT ~ ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL LOT 4 ~DDRESS DATE OF FINAL I 6839 Landriano Pl. 3/1/90 5I !Z427 Lomello Way 9/6/59 2 6847 Landriano P1. 3/1/90 62 11417 Lomello Way 5/31/89 3 6856 Landriana Pl. 3/12/90 4 6863 Landriano Pl. 3/2/90 63 1142I Anzio Ct. 9/6/89 5 6871 handriano Pl. 3/2/90 64 11413 Anzio Ct. 9/5/89 6 6879 Landriano Pl. 3/9/90 65 11405 Anzio Ct. 8/31/89 7 6887 Landriana Pl. 2/26/90 66 11406 Anzio Ct. 9/8/89 8 6896 Landriano Pl. 3/5/90 67 11414 Anzio Ct. 9/8/89 9 6903 Landriano Pl. 3/9/90 68 11422 Anzio Ct. 9/14/89 10 6911 Landriano Pl. 3/1/90 69 11430 Anzio Ct. 9/14/89 11 6919 Landriana Pl. 2/28/90 12 6927 Landriana P1. 2/26/90 70 11410 Lomello Way 9/18/99 13 6920 Landriana Pl. 2/28/g0 71 11418 Lomello Way 9/14/89 14 6912 Landriano Pl. 3/8/90 72 11426 Lomello Way 9/14/89 18 6904 Landriano Pl. 3/5/90 73 11434 Lomello Way 9/18/89 16 6896 tandriano Pl. 3/6/90 74 11442 Lomello Way 9/18/89 17 6888 Landriano Pl. 3/6/90 75 11450 Lomello Way 9/20/89 18 6880 Landriano Pl. 3/9/90 76 11458 hamella Way 9/19/89 19 6872 Landriano P1. 3/7/90 77 11502 Lomello Way ll/3/89 20 6864 Landriano Pl. 3/7/g0 78 11510 Lomello Way 11/3/89 79 II518 Lomello Way 11/3/Bg 21 6863 Rovato Pl. 11/30/89 80 11526 Lomello Way I1/3/89 6869 Rovato Pl. 12/12/89 81 11534 Lomello Way 11/B/Bg 6875 Rovato Pl. I2/6/89 82 11542 Lomello Way 11/B/89 6881Rovato P1. 1216/89 83 11550 Lomello Way II/8/89 25 6887 Rovato Pl. I2/13/89 84 11558 Lomello Way 11/16/89 26 6893 Rovata Pl. 12/5/89 85 11566 Lomello Way !1/30/89 27 6899 Rayate Pl. 12/7/89 86 11574 Lomello Way 11/17/89 28 6894 Rovata P1. 12/5/89 87 11584 Lamella Way 2/26/90 ?g 6888 Ravato Pl. 11/30/89 30 6882 Rovato Pl. 12/I1/89 88 11579 Marcella Way 2/26/90 31 6876 Rovata P1. 11/30/89 89 11573 Marcella Way 2/26/90 32 6870 Rovato Pl. 12/6/89 gO 11567 Marcella Way 3/1/90 33 6864 Rovato Pl. 11/20/89 91 11561 Marcella Way 3/1/90 92 11555 Marcella Way 3/1/90 34 6855 Castella Pl. 11/14/89 93 11549 Marcella Way 3/2/90 35 6863 Castella P1. I1/22/89 94 11543 Marcella Way 3/6/90 36 6871 Castella Pl. 11/13/89 95 11537 Marcella Way 3/6/90 37 6879 Castella Pl. 1/11/90 96 1IS31 Marcella Way 10/30/89 38 6887 Castella Pl. II/9/89 97 6795 Sorento Rd. I0/30/89 39 6878 Castella P1. 11/9/89 98 6797 Sorento Rd. 10/30/89 40 6870 Castella Ph II/9/89 99 6799 Sorento Rd. 10/30/89 41 6862 Castella Pl. 11/9/89 42 6854 Castella Pl. 11/8/89 I00 6794 Salerno Pl. !0/30/89 I01 6786 Salerno P1. I0/30/8~ 43 6863 Pandino Ct. 6/27/90 102 5778 Salerno P1. 10/91/89 44 6861 Pandina Ct. 7/3/91 103 6770 Salerno P1. II/2/~9 45 6869 Pandino Ct. 6/27/91 104 6?62 Salerno P1. 10/31/89 46 6870 Pandino Ct. 8/2/91 I05 6754 Salerno P1. 10/30/89 47 6862 Pandino Ct. 9/7/90 I06 6746 Salerno P1. 10/30/89 48 6854 Pandina Ct. 7/31/90 107 6753 Salerno Pl. 10/91/89 108 6761 Salerno P1. 10/31/89 49 6853 Sorrenta Rd. 5/2/90 109 6769 Salerno P1. 11/1/89 50 6861Sorrento Rd. 5/2/90 I10 6777 Salerno Pl. 11/I/89 51 6869 Sorrento Rd. 1/28/91 111 6785 Salerno Pl. 1I/2/89 6870 Sarrenta ~d. 6/21/90 112 6793 Salerno Pl. 10/30/89 6862 Sarrento Rd. 6/I4/90 6854 Sorrento Rd. 5/1/90 I13 11525 Marcella Hay 2/13/90 55 6853 Fano Ct. 8131/89 114 11519 Marcella Way 2/20/90 56 6861Fano Ct. 8/31/89 115 11513 Marcella Way 2/13/90 57 6869 Fano Ct. 8/31/89 116 11507 Marcella Way 2/14/90 58 6870 [ano Ct. 9/5/89 117 11501 Marcella Way 2/14/90 59 6862 Fano Ct. 9/5/89 118 11500 Marcella Way 2/15/90 60 6854 Fano Ct. 9/6/89 119 11506 Marcella Way 2/15/90/(~ 2 OF 6, 01-1994 TRACT PLAN (13442) SINGLE FAN[LY DWELLINGS TRACT PLAN (13022) SINGLE FANILY OWELLING5 LOT ~ ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL LOT I ADDRESS OATE OF FiNA. I2n 11512 Marcello Way 2/15/90 25 6983 Walker Ct. 12/31/87 1 11518 Marcello Way 2/16/90 26 6979 Walker Ct. I2/31/87 lz. 11524 Hercello Way 2/16/90 27 6973 Walker Ct. 12/31/87 123 11530 Marcello Way 2/20/90 28 6969 Walker Ct. 12/31/87 124 11536 Marcello Way 2/20/90 29 6963 Walker Ct. I2/31/87 125 11542 Marcello Way 2/21/90 30 6959 Walker Ct. 12/31/87 126 11548 Marcello Way 2/22/90 127 11554 Marcello Way 2/22/90 31 11272 Cannon St. 12/29/87 128 11560 Marcello Way 2/22/90 32 11266 Gannon St. 12/29/87 129 11566 Marcello Way 2/23/90 33 11262 Cannon St. I2/29/87 34 11254 Cannon St. 12/29/87 130 11553 Colorno Dr. 7/31/90 35 11248 Cannon St. I2/29/87 131 11545 Colorno Dr. 1/31/91 36 11242 Cannon St. 12/29/87 132 11537 Colorno Dr. IO/2A/gO 133 11529 Colorno Dr. 4/6/90 37 11243 Cortland 51. 11/18/87 38 11249 Cortland St. I1/18/87 I34 6794 Colorno Ct. 8/30/90 39 11257 Cortland St. 11/18/87 135 6786 Colorno Ct. 4/5/90 iO 11263 Cortland St. 11/18/87 136 6778 Colorno Ct. 4/5/90 41 11269 Cortland St. 11/18/87 137 6770 Colorno Ct. 8/6/90 42 11275 Cortland St, 11/18/87 I38 6762 Colorno Ct. 8/30/90 43 11281 Cortland St. I1/18/87 139 6761 Colorno Ct. 2/17/90 44 11284 Cortland St. 11/18/87 140 5769 Colorno Ct. 1/31/91 AS 11278 Cortland St. I1/18/87 14I 6777 Colorno Ct. 9/6/90 46 11272 Cortland St. 11/18/87 142 6785 Colorno Ct. 5/4/90 47 11266 Cortland St. 11/18/87 48 11260 Cortland St. 11/18/87 I43 6790 LandfienD Pl. 3/!9/90 49 11254 Cortland St. 11/18/87 144 6782 Landriano Pl. 3/29/90 SO 11248 Cortland St. 11/18/87 145 6774 Landriano Pl. 3/27/90 51 11242 COrtland St. 11/18/87 I46 6766 Landriano Pl. 2/17/90 52 11236 Cortland St. 11/18/87 147 6771Landriano P1. 3/27/90 148 6779 Landriano Pl. 6/!8/90 53 11225 Drake St. 7/10/87 149 6787 Landriano Pl. 1/31/91 54 11233 Drake St, 7110/87 1F~ 6795 Landriano Pl. 7/2/90 SS 11341 Drake St, 7/10/87 I 6803 Landriano Pl. 1/31/91 56 11247 Drake St, 7/10/87 15, 6811 LandfienD Pl. 1/31/91 57 l1253.Drake St, 7/10/87 153 6819 Landriano Pl. 6/27/90 58 11259 Drake St. 7/I0t87 59 11265 Drake St. 7/10/87 60 11269 Drake St. 7/10/87 61 11273 Drake St. 7/10/87 62 6877 Shelion Ct, 7/23/87 DATES OF DOCO14ENTS:' 63 6871Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 64 6865 SheIron Ct. 7/23/87 Beginnin~ 2/24/87 Ending 8/9/88 65 6859 Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 66 6853 Sheit on Ct, 7/23/87 TRACT PLAN (130~2) SINGLE FANILY DWELLIN6S 67 5847 Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 68 6841 Shelion Ct. 7/23/87 69 6835 Shelton Ct. 7/23/81 LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 70 6831 Sheit on Ct. 7/23/87 I 7000 Drew Ct. 6/17/88 71 6825 Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 72 6826 Shelt~n Ct. 7/23/87 2 7006 Drew Ct. 6/17/88 73 6830 Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 3 7014 Dr~w Ct. 6/17/88 74 6836 Shelion Ct. 7/23/87 4 7015 Drew Ct, 6/17/88 5 7013 Drew Ct. 6/17/88 75 6844 Shel ton Ct. 7/23/87 6 7007 Drew Ct. 6/17/88 76 6850 Shelion Ct. 7/23/87 77 6856 Shelton Ct, 7/23/87 7 7001 Drew Ct. 6/17/88 78 6863 Shell on Ct. 7/23/87 8 6976 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 79 6868 Shelton Ct. 7/23/87 9 6982 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 10 6988 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 80 6869 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 11 6994 Nova Ct. 6/I4/88 81 6863 Hudson Ct, 8/19/87 12 6995 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 82 6857 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 13 6991 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 83 6851 Hudson Ct. 8119187 I4 6985 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 84 6845 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 15 6981 Nova Ct, 6/14/88 85 6839 Hudson Ct, 8/19/87 I6 6973 Nova Ct. 6/14/88 86 6833 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 87 6836 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 ; 11243 Cannon St. 6/14/88 88 6842 Hudson Ct, 8/19/87 1 11251 Cannon St. 6/14/88 89 6850 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 19 6962 Walker Ct. '12/31/87 90 6856 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 91 6862 Hudson Ct, 8/19/87 20 6970 Walker Ct. 12/31/57 2! 6976 Walker Ct. 12/31/97 92 6868 Hudson Ct. 8/19/87 22 6982 Walker Ct. 12/31187 93 6876 HudSon Ct. 8/19/87 23 6988 Walker Ct. 12/31/87 24 6989 Walker Ct. 94 6885 Cabrini Ct, 8/9/88 3 OF 6, 01-1994 TRACT PLAN (13022) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS TRACT PLAN (130~2) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL LOT e ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 6879 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 165 11215 Cortland St. 4/1/88 6873 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 166 11221 Cortland St. 4/1/88 6867 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 I67 11227 Cortland St. 4/I/88 98 686I Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 99 6855 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 168 11230 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 100 6849 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 169 11224 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 I01 6843 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 170 11220 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 I02 6844 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 171 11216 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 103 6850 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 i72 11210 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 104 6856 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 173 11206 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 106 6862 Ca brini Ct. 8/9/88 174 11200 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 I06 6868 Cabrini Ct. 8/9/88 176 11196 Amarillo St. 6/23/98 107 6874 Cabrini Ct, 8/9/88 178 11192 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 I08 6880 Ca brini Ct. 8/9/88 177 11186 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 109 6886 Cabri ni Ct. 8/9/88 178 11182 ~narillo St. 6/23/88 179 II178 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 I10 6893 Fis k Ct. 3/2/87 180 11172 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 111 6887 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 I81 11168 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 112 688I Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 182 11144 A~narillo St. 6/23/88 113 6875 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 183 11140 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 I14 6871 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 184 11136 ~arillo St. 6/23/88 115 6867 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 I85 11132 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 116 6876 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 186 11128 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 117 6884 Fis k Ct. 3/2/87 I87 1112A A~arillo St. 6/23/88 118 6892 Fisk Ct. 3/2/87 188 11120 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 189 11116 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 119 11138 Delaware St. 3/5/87 190 11112 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 120 11130 Delaware St. 3/5/87 I91 11106 A~arillo St. 6/23/88 121 11127 Delaware St. 3/5/87 192 11100 Amarillo St. 6/23/88 122 11133 Delaware St. 3/5/87 I23 11139 Delaware St. 3/5/87 I93 6987 Chapman Pl. 3/30/87 I24 11145 Delaware St. 3/5/87 !94 6979 Cha~nan Pl. 3/30/87 125 11151 Delaware St. 3/5/87 I96 6969 Chapman P1. 3/30/87 11157 Delaware St. 3/6/87 11161 Delaware St. 3/5/87 196 11101 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 11167 Delaware St. 3/5/87 197 11107 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 I2~ 11173 Delaware St. 3/5/87 I98 11113 Trenton Ct. 5/1/97 130 11179 Delaware St. 3/5/87 199 111Ig Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 131 11183 Delaware St. 3/5/87 200 11125 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 132 11187 Delaware St. 3/6/87 201 I1129 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 133 11191 Delaware St. 3/5/87 202 11133 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 I34 11195 Delaware St. 3/5/87 203 11137 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 135 11199 Delaware St. 3/5/87 204 11141 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 205 11145 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 136 11222 Cortland St. ~/12/88 206 11130 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 137 I1218 Cortland St. ~/12/BB 207 11124 Trenton Ct. 6/1/87 I38 11212 Cortland St. 4/12/88 208 11116 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 139 11208 Cortland St. 4/12/BB 209 11106 Trenton Ct. 5/1/87 140 11202 Cortland St. 4/12/88 210 11100 Trenton Ct. 5/I/87 141 11IGB Cortland St. 4/12/BB 142 11192 Cortland St. 4/12/BB 211 11098 Piednmnt St. 6/26/87 143 11188 Cortland St. 4/12/BB 2 12 11094 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 213 11090 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 144 6947 Lamar Ct. 4/6/BB 2!4 11084 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 145 6939 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 2!5 11080 Piednmnt St. 6/25/87 1~6 693I Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 216 11076 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 147 6923 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 217 11072 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 I48 5922 Lamar Ct. A/6/88 218 11068 Piedmont St. 6/25/87 149 6923 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 150 6934 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 2Ig 6953 Chapman Pl. 6/25/87 i51 6940 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 220 6943 Chapman Pl. 6/25/87 I52 6946 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 221 6935 ChapmanN. 6/25/87 I53 6952 Lamar Ct. 4/6/88 222 I1059 Delaware 3/g/87 I54 11161 Cortland St. 1/I/88 223 11067 Delaware 3/9/87 165 11165 Cortland St. 4/1/88 224 11075 Delaware 3/9/87 11169 Cortland St. 4/I/88 225 11083 Delaware 3/9/87 11173 Cortland St. 4/1/88 226 11091 Delaware 3/8/87 11177 Cortland St. 4/I/88 227 11099 Delaware 3/9/87 ~g 11183 Cortland St. 4/1/88 228 11107 Delaware 3/9/87 160 11187 Cortland St. 4/1/88 229 11115 Delaware 3/9/87 161 11193 Cortland St. 4/I/88 230 11112 Delaware 3/9/87 162 11197 Cortland St. 4/1/88 23I 11104 Delaware 3/9/87 I63 11201 Cortland St. 4/I/88 232 11098 Delaware 3/9/87 164 11209 Cortland St. 4/1/88 233 llOgO Delaware St. 3/9/87 ~ 234 11084 Delaware St. 3/9/87 4 OF 6, 01-1994 TRACT PLAN (130~2} SINGLE FAHILY DWELLINGS DATES OY DOCU)IEI~"~S: Beginning 2117/90 Ending LO/iO/9i LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 235 11078 Delaware St. 3/g/87 TRACT PLAN (12859) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 236 11072 Delaware St. 3/9/87 237 11066 Delaware St. 3/9/87 LOT # ADDRESS DATE OF ~I~AL 238 11050 Furman Ct. I0/7/87 ! 8501 Edwin St. !0/!0/9! 239 11044 Furman Ct. I0/7/87 2 8509 Edwin St. 8/8/9I 2~0 11038 Furman Ct. 10/7/87 3 8517 Edwin St. 5/29/90 241 11032 Fun.an Ct. 10/7/87 A 8525 Edwin St. 6/!8/90 242 11027 Furman Ct. 10/7/87 5 8533 Edwin St. 9/5/90 243 11033 Furman Ct. I0/7/87 5 8541 E~win St. 8/31/90 244 11039 Furman Ct. 10/7/87 7 8549 Edwin St. 8/!5/90 245 11047 Furman Ct. I0/7/87 8 8557 Edwin St. 5/!8/90 9 8565 Edwin St. 4/15/91 248 11040 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 I0 8573 Edwin St. 9/5/90 247 11032 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 11 8581 Edwin St. 9/5/g0 248 11024 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 12 8589 Edwin St. 7/19/91 2a9 11016 Piednmnt St. 5/22/87 13 8597 Edwin St. 7/19/91 250 11017 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 !4 8596 Edwin St. 7/19/91 251 11027 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 15 8588 Edwin St. 7/19/91 252 11033 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 16 8580 Edwin St. 8/15/90 253 11041 Piedmont St. 5/22/87 !7 8572 Edwin St. 5/29/90 18 8564 Edwin St. 12/17/90 254 7000 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 I9 8556 Edwin St. 8/8/91 255 7004 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 20 8548 Edwin St. 9/20/90 256 7008 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 21 8540 Edwin St. 9/20/90 257 7012 Beak Ct. 3/12/87 22 8532 Edwin St. 8/!5/90 258 7015 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 23 8524 Edwin St. 2/17/90 259 7011 8eal Ct. 3/12/87 24 8516 Edwin St. 8/8/9I 260 7009 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 25 8508 Edwin St. 8/8/91 251 7008 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 25 8500 Edwin St. I0/10/9! 262 7001 Beal Ct. 3/12/87 253 11101 Amarillo St. 2/24/87 '64 11105 Amarillo St. 2/24/87 ~55 11109 ~arillo St. 2/24/87 256 11113 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 DATZS O, ~S~ 267 11117 Amarillo St. 2/24/87 Beginning S/2/90 258 11121 Amarillo St. 2/24/87 Ending ~0/4/9~ 269 11123 laritlo St. 2/24/87 TRACT PLAN {12420) SINGLE FA~ILY OWELLINGS 270 11127 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 271 11181 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 LOT # ADDRES6 DATE OF FINAL 272 11137 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 273 11143 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 1 9192 E. Rancho Park Circle 6/28/91 274 11149 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 2 9190 E. Rancho Park Circle 5/28/91 275 11155 A~arillo St. 2/24/87 3 9182 E. Rancho Park Circle 6/28/91 4 9180 E. ~ancho Park Circle 6/28/91 5 9164 E. ~ancho Perk Circle 5/28/91 6 9162 E. ~ncho Perk Circle 7/11/91 DATES OF DOCKS: 7 9154 E. Rancho Perk Circle 5/28/91 Beginning 12/28/90 Ending 1/21/92 8 9152 E. PaneND Park Circle 6/28/91 9 9148 E. RaneND Perk Circle 8/28/91 10 9142 E. Rancho Perk Circle 7/11/91 TRACT PLAN (12462) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 11 9259 N. ~ancho Park Circle 8/28/91 LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 12 9261 N. ~ancho Park Circle 7/19/91 13 9255 N. Ranthe Perk CirCle 7/11/91 I 6116 Roberrs R1. 7/16/91 14 9253 N. ~ancNo Perk Circle 5/28/91 2 6136 Roberrs Pl. 5/13/9I 15 9248 N. ~ancho Park Circle 7/24/91 18 9254 N. RaneND Park Circl e 7/24/91 3 13025 Shasta Ct. 12/28/90 17 9260 N. Rancho Park Circle 7/11/91 4 13043 Shasta Ct. 2/8/91 I8 9268 N. ~ancho Park Circle 6/28/91 5 13061 Shasta Ct. 5/20/91 19 9103 E. Rancho Park Circle 8/8/91 6 13079 Shasta Ct. 3/19/91 20 9105 E. RaneND Park Circle 7/lg/91 7 13090 Shasta Ct. ll/21/91 21 9118 E. RaneND Park Circle 6/28/91 8 13072 Shasta Ct. 8/I5/91 22 9117 E. ~ancho Park Circle 7/I9/91 9 13054 Shasta Ct. 5/29/91 23 9125 E. RaneND Park Circle 7/1I/9! lO 13036 Shasta Ct. 6/7/91 24 9127 E. RaneND Park Circle 7/I9/9t 25 9145 E. RaneND Park Circle 6/28/91 ~1 61IS Roberrs P1. 5/14/91 25 9lSI E. RancNo Park Circle 7/19/9l 12 6131 Roberrs Pl. 8/15/91 27 9157 E. ~ancho Park Circle 7/19/91 28 9163 E. RaneND Park Circle 6/28/~1 13 13067 Sun~ni t Ave. 9/3/91 29 9179 E. RaneND Park Circle 6/28/91 1, 13083 s.,it A... 1/21/92 30 9185 E. Ra.o,o Rank C,rc,, 31 9191 E. Rancho Park Circle 5 OF 6, 01-1994 TRACT PLAN (12420) SINGLE FAMILY 3WELLINGS LOT ~ ADDRESS DATE OF F,INAL Beginning 6/27/91 E/l~ing 2/5/92 32 9197 E. Rancho Park Circle 10/4/91 9214 E. Bancho Park Circle 5/2/90 TRACT PLAN (11626) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 9215 E. Rancho Park Circle 5/2/90 9215 E. Rancho Park Circle 7/23/90 ~OT ~ ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL ~6 9217 E. Rancho Park Circle 7/23/90 37 9229 E. RanenD Park Circle 7/23/90 2 9069 Laramie 6/27/9I 38 9227 E. Rancho Park Circle 7/18/90 3 9053 Laramie 7/2/91 39 9239 E. Rancho Park Circle 7/17/90 29 9020 ReaIes Expired 40 9237 E. Rancho Park Circle 7/23/90 30 9034 Reales Expired 52 9049 Reales Expired 41 9255 Rancho Park Pl. 9/10/90 53 9033 Reales Expired 42 9253 Rancho Park Pl. 7/25/90 70 9042 Laramie 2/5/92 43 925l Rancho Park P1. 7/25/90 71 9052 Laramie 2/5/92 44 9249 Rancho Park Pl. 7/25/90 45 9269 Rancho Park P1. 7/25/90 46 9267 Rancho Park Pl. 7/25/90 47 9265 Rancho Park P1. 7/27/90 48 9263 Rancho Park Pl. 7/i7/90 DATES OP DOClIMZNTS= 49 9277 Rancho Park PI. 7/30/90 Beginning All Permits Ending 12/6/91 50 9275 Rancho Park Pl. 7/27/90 xp~re - 51 9279 Rancho Park P1. 7/17/90 52 9281 Rancho Park Pl. 7/17/90 53 9273 Rancho Park Pl. 7/27/90 TRACT {13886} CONDOMINIUNS 54 9271 Rancho Park Pl. 7/27/90 55 9280 Rancho Park Pl. 7/20/90 BLDG ~ ADDRESS DATE OF 56 9270 Rancid Park Pl. 9/I0/90 EXPIRATION 57 9262 Ranc~o Park Pl. 7/20/90 58 9260 Rancho Park Pl. 7/20/90 1 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 59 9252 Rancho Park Pl. 7/30/90 2 12924 Base Line Rd, 12/6/91 50 9250 Rancho Park Pl. 7/IB/90 3 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 61 9209 Rancho Park Pl. 7/17/90 4 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 62 9207 Bancho Park Pl. 9/10/90 5 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 63 9208 Rancho Park Pl. 7/17/90 6 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 64 9206 Rancho Park Pl. 7/31/90 7 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 9204 Rancho Park PI. 7/I7/90 8 12924 Base Lfne Rd, 12/6/91 9202 Rancho Park Pl. 3/10/90 9 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 9203 Rancho Park P1. 7/I7/90 I0 12924 Base Line Rd. I2/6/91 ~o 920I Rancho Park Pl. 7/31/90 11 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 12 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 13 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 14 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 15 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 16 12924 Base Line Rd, 12/6/91 I7 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 DATES OF DOC~I(EI~TS= ZB 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 19 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 Beginning_ 4/24/90 Ending i/9/9! 20 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 21 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 PARCEL MAP (7902) SINGLE FAMILy DWELLINGS 22 12924 Base Line Rd. I2/6/91 23 12924 Base Line Rd. 12/6/91 L_OT ~ ADDRESS q,ATE OF FINAL 5717 Mayberry 4/24/90 5739 Mayberry 4/24/g0 5759 Mayberry 4/24/90 DATES OF DO~X~(~TS: 5779 Mayberry I/9/91 Beginning 1/7/91 E)ldl~g 10/24/91 TRACT PLAN (12870) SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS BATES QF DOCCrHEN~S: LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL Beginning 10/8/90 Ending L0/21/91 I4 13141Chickasaw Rd. 2/8/91 I5 13157 Chickasaw Rd. 9/18/9I 16 13173 Chickasaw Rd. 9/25/91 TRACT { 13813) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES 17 13189 ChicLesaw Rd, 9/25/91 I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 18 6383 Chattaw Pl. 9/13/91 19 6363 Choctaw P1. 9/25/91 6850 PeDperidge Ct. IO/IB/gl 20 6343 Choctaw Pl. 10/18/91 6840 Pepperidge Ct. I0/21/91 21 6323 Chectaw Pl. 10/21/91 3 9268 Pepperidge Lane 10/8/90 22 13186 Arepaho Rd. Z/12/91 4 9278 Pepperidge Lane I0/8/90 23 13170 Arapaho Rd. 2/25/91 5 9288 PeDperidDe Lane 10/8/90 24 13154 Arapaho Rd. 2/25/91 6 9298 Pepperidge Lane I0/8/g0 25 13138 Arapaho Rd. 3/6/91 ZX~ 6 OF 6, 01-I994 lltACT PLAN {12870) SINGLE FANILY DWELLINGS LOT I ADDRESS DATE OF FINAL 26 13122 Arapaho Rd. 3/6/91 27 13106 Arapaho Rd. 3/6/91 28 13090 Arapaho Rd. 4/23/91 29 13062 Cherokee Rd. 3/27/91 51 13099 Arapaho Rd. 1/7/91 52 6326 Choctaw Pl. 3/16/92 53 6346 Choctaw Pl. I0/24/91 54 6366 Choctaw P1. 10/24/91 55 6386 Choctaw P1. 9/13/91 56 13134 Chickasaw Rd. 2/19/91 ~ rY 07 ':CEIVED I' vCHO CUCAMONGA CI~ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ TYCL~~ Destruction Notification ReDo,"t PAGE: I DATE: 1!/29/93 JAN 0 3 1994 TIME; 14:59:2!0 THE FOLLOWING RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR DESTRUCTION. PL~SE INDICATE THEIR DISPOSITION THEN RETURN THIS REPORT, SIGNED, TO THE RECORDS mANAGEMENT DIVISION (i.e. RETAIN THOSE RECOROS MARKED WITH AN 'X' FOR · ,q~)NTHS/RECORDS WHICH ARE NOT MARKED, HAY BE DESTROYED) SILL TO: 4532 RECORDS COORO!NATOR: SI~EK. KAREN DEPT: 4532 DEPT N~E: CO~UNITY SERVICES ~IL SORT: PHONE: (S09)989-1851 ~T: 2109 MARK DATES PERN~iENT RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETRI~AL ~X (X) ~BT ~X C~TBTS BEGINNING BDING 80X NO, L~ATION Box 12-1993 DATE SBT TO: }_lD RECR~TI~ FILES: RECEIPTS 03/01/90 09/30/90 "HELD" 48! 05-02-03 2 09-1992 Folder I 1 SPRING i SU~ER 1990 REGIST~TI~ RECEIPTS 03/01/90 09/30/90 I_1 O RECREATION FILE: RECEIPTS 09/01/90 02/28/91 *$ HELD *~ 534 05-02-02 I 02-1993 Folder I 1 FALL 90 REGISTRATION RECEIPTS 09/0t/90 02/28/91 Folder ! 2 WINTER 90/91 REGISTRATION RECEIPTS 09/01/90 02/29/91 Folder I 3 PLAYSCHOOL RECEIPTS 09/01/90 02/29/91 RECREATION FILE,q: RECEIPTS 04/01/9T 09/30/S! ** HELD ,s 550 05-02-03 1 09-1993 D/RECREATION REFERENCE PAPERS 01/01/S9 12/30/90 530 05-02-02 3 12-1993 Folder i 1 YOUTH SPORTS COUNCIL SPRING-SUlelER 1989 01/01/99 12/30/00 Folder I 2 ADDRESSES/SCHOOLS 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder ~ 3 AOORESSES/YOUTH SPORTS COUNCIL 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 4 YOUTH SPORTS COONCiL GENERAL OORRESPONO~CE 01/01/00 12/30/90 Folder i 5 VINEYARD LITTLE LEA~E 01/01/S9 12/30/S0 Folder I i ALTA LOft& LITTLE LEAGUE 01/01/00 12/30/90 Folder I 7 CITRUS LITTLE LEAGUE 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I G RANDNO LITTLE LEAGUE 01/01/00 12/30/90 Folder I 9 RANCHO CUCJUR~6A. PONY COLT BASEBALL 01/01/S9 12/30/90 Folder I 10 ~'Ct)CAIqoNEA, LEGION ~EEALL 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I ~1 A C E YOUTH ~EALL 01/01/09 12/30/90 Folder I 12 NZSS SOFtBALL NqERICA 01/01/99 12/30/90 Folder I 1~ A.Y,S.O. REGION 05 01/01/S9 12/30/9D Fo]der I 14 ~ SOCCER 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 15 A.C.E. T-BALL 01/01/S9 12/30/00 Folder i 16 RAN~O CtJCAJ~ON~, POP NA~ER 01/01/89 12/30/90 Fo]der I 1T FALL 1990 CO-ED YOUTH GASKETBALL 01/01/9S 12/30/90 Folder I 18 CO-ED YOUTH BASKETBALL 1/5/91 01/01/09 12/30/90 Folder I 19 3 X 3 8UKETBALL 0/25-11/15 01/01/89 12/30/00 Folder I 20 kQqENS WINTER INVZTATIONAL 1991 01/01/89 12/30/90 '1 / I I_1_1_1 I ~e;" ~NNt OTA, eWiAeER I ~Z Date: ASST, CITY ATTO~E'f .... ~;, CZTY OF R~CHO CUCA~ONSA AMO .~ hstruct~ Notification Reoo~t ~CL~RK PAGE: 2 DATE: T!/29/93 JAN 0 3 1994 TZNE: 14:59:440 ~E FOLL~[NG RE~R~ ARE ~E~LED FOR D~T~CTZON. PL~E [NDZCAT5 THEZR DZS~ZTZ~ TH~ R~U~ ~1S REPORT, SIGNED, TO THE RECOR~ ~ ~AGB~T DZViSZ~ (Le. RETAZN THeE RECORDS NARKED HITH ~ 'X' FOR __ ' ~S/RE~R~ ~]CH ARE NOT ~RKED, ~Y 8E DESTROYED) 8Z~ TO: 4532 RE~R~ C~RDZNATOR: S[~EK, DEPT: 4532 DEPT N~E: ~Ni~ SERVZC~ ~ZL SORT: ~E: (909)989-1851 E~: 2109 ~ ' "' DATES PE~BT RE~RD CTR. DEST~Y R~RZ~AL ~X (X) ~ ~X ~TB~ BEGI~ING BO~NG ~X NO. L~ATI~ ~ t2-1993 DATE S~T TO: Fold~ ! 21 SLO PIT~ ~L 2/7/9t 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 22 ~PER~L MB'S D 19~11/25-1/26 01/01/89 12/30/90 Foldlr I 23 I ~l~ ~ lIB. '~ 01/01/89 12/30/90 Fold~ I 24 FALL 1990 INST~CTOR RE~RTS (PA~BTS) 01/01/89 ~2/30/90 Folder I 25 ~ ~ILL ~ 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folde~ I 26 ~B F~T~LL 1990 01/01/89 t2/30/90 Fold~ I 21 I~T~TOI PA~ 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 Foad~ I 28 SB~ ~TIVITIB ~R 1989 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 29 ~ RZDB PB ~ 1989 01/0T/89 12/30/90 Fold~l '30 ~ER P~YG~NO 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder ! 31 OLD T~ DEDI~TII -. 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 32 TEB P~ Ol/O~/fi 12/30/90 Fol~r I 33 Y~ T~IS T~ 19~. 01/01/fi T2/30/90 Fold~ I 34 ~ ~IV~ ~R 1990 01/01/89 ~2/30/90 hld~ I 35 ~D P~ ~!ER 1990 0~/0t/89 12/30/~ hl~r I 36 F~ILY BN OL~I~R 1990 ~YO~Y~ P~ 0t/01/89 12/30/90 Fol~ir I 31 I~ffi 1990 . :: ' 01/01/89 Fold~ I 30 ~ G~P~INE 1990 .01/01/8] 12/30/90 Folder I 39 e ~~'~+~ 01/01/89 . 12/30/90 Fold~ I 40' I DAY ~ 1990, - 01/01/89 12/30/90 ..Fol~ I' 41 ~B C~ [NB ~lZ~ 1990 01/01/89 T2/30/90 Folde I 12 ~III~ I 1990 ' - " 01/01/~ 12/30/90 Folder I 43 T~K i FIll 1ego 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folde'l 4S '~TZI ~I~. '?- -:, ' . 01/01/8] 12/30/90 "Folde ! '46 S~ll~ 19i0 4/1F7/29 ' 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folde I 41 Zl PA~ ~RI~ 1990 Ol/01/fi ~2/30/90' Fol~ i ' 48 S~II ~ ~Y I S~]N6 1990 : 01/01/89 12/30/90 Fol~ I 49' ~l INB~TII S~I~ 1990 01/01/81 12/30/)0 Folde I 50- .......... :~' 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 51 R.C. ~ NBLI~ (~) 3/21-6/1 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 FoI~P ! 52 JR ~TE T~ 5/20/i0' - '01/01/89 12/30/90 Folde I 53 Y~ ~l ~/1-4/15 19~. . 01/01/8g 12/30/90 Folde I S4.;. 'NINi"~' NIN~R ~l ~E 1/22-3/18 1990 ~'' 01/0~/89 Fol~r I 55 "~GB~ IF~TI~ "' -' """ 01/01/89 12/30/90 ~ ~te: -; .- ~T. CIff A~Olff. -. " ::' '-:-"'7-7- ~ ' -" ' ,~. ".".' ..... ~ .,~- z+~ ....; '~::~ ~,:~' :-...~,~.,~..~:.:_ :,.- .- ......... . '... ./. RECEi C!TY gF RANCNO CUCAP~NGA O~truct~on Notification Report gATE: !1/29/93 JAN 0 3 1994 GET~X R ~'~:' ~'OO:2N1GQ ~ANAGE~T 0IVISIONORO~ ~HZCH ARE NOT ~AR~ED ~AY ~E 9ESTROYE ) . _ ........... ' gATES ~X NO LOCATZ~ ~x 12-I (X) ~ ~ .......... / .... ~/01/89 12/3Q/90 Folder I 56 l[~ ~t~T ~ 01/01/89 12/3Ql90 FoldeP I 5~ SUPER~ N~S D 1/26-21 1990 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder ~ 58 ~5 ~IMTER [NVtTATI~AL 2/3-I 1990 01/01/89 12/30/9Q Folde~ I 59 ~[NTER gAY C~P 1989 12/18-22 Q1/0I/fi 12/30/9Q Folder I 60 KIDOIE ~GE~ PR~ 01/91/89 1~/30/90 Fo~der I 61 ~tNTER INST~CTO~ p~TS 01/01/89 l~/3Q/gO Folder I 62 A~AT~ ~LICY ~UAL 01/01/89 12/30/90 Folder I 63 RESSAGE ~ hie: Date: ELIGXBLE ~XE5 ~ HOLD ~X~ NEEDING T0 BE R~ffiEO FOR D~T~CTt~ ~XES TO BE D~T~Y~D (Includtn~ t~e which mst CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA gestru:tlon Nailricer!on Report PAGE: i ~ATE: !!/29/93 TIME: THE FOLLOWING RECOROS ARE SCHEDULE,n FOR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE THEIR OISPOS!TION THEN RETURN ?HIS REPORT, GIGNED, TO THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION (i.e. RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARKSO WITH AN 'X' POR ___ ' MONTHS/RECOROS WHICH ARE NOT MARKED, MAY EE DESTROYED) BILL TO: 4639 RECORDS COOROINATOR: DODRILL. SUE · DEPT: 4S3B DEPT NAME: ENGR TRAFFIC/DESIGN MAIL SORT: PHONE· {909)g89-1851 ~XT- 2363 MARK ......................................................................................... DATES PERMANENT RECORD CTR, DESTROY RETR!EVAL BOX (X) EVENT BOX CONTENTS EEGINN!NG ENOING BOX NO, LOCATION Box 12-1993 DAT ............................................................................................................ : ........... {_t P CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTS Of/Of/El I2/29/83 262 15-03-03 2 12-!g93 Folder ~ 1 HILLSIDE IMPROVEMENTS OI/O1/B! !2/29/83 Folder ~ 2 RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION 01/01/81 12/29/83 Folder ~ 3 TECHNICAL ~ATA 01/0!/81 12/29/83 Folder 8 4 REVISED SOIL REPORTS O!/Ol/Si 12/29/83 Foldmr ~ 5 FONTANA PAVING INC, 0!/01/8! ~2/29/83. Fclder ~ 6 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS O1/O1/S! I2/29/83 L/~/:,/~ROJECTS 01/01/82 !2/29/63 362 t7-01-02 4 12-!993 OE 'N I ;'/'t ?~Lc~ginee M~i 2 1 Engineer AUk ROUGEAU, 'Traff~ Engineer ASST. CITY AITOJ~IEY ELIGIBLE BOXES ON HOLD ," BOXES NEEDING TO BE RETURNS FOR DESTRUCTION O BOXES TO 86 DESTROYED (Including those which must be RE~JRNE~) 2 c,'_,. ~ ~ ~S"'2~ ~VEL ?:/C'/U '2'2~'~ ................ :'/S'l~~ =:~e" ~ '5 SS~ZTTE~ =~R ECONO~G DEVELOa~NT U,'U/~' ............ HO CUC =s :e* ~ '9 CJCA~GA PRZNT[NG CO~=ANV, :%. ~,/2'/~' '2/29/~3 CI~CL~RK ~N~ :s :a*: 20 ~NAMIC GRAPHICS, :%. "/?W~* '2,'2g/S3 =: :~-: ~' =~s~,~ sxPEss ""~' "" "'~/0~ FEB 15 1994 :: :at ~23 :Oe~HILL INOEPENDENT ~NK "~.'?'/~':21U:,'23 7 8 9 ]0 lj ]] I Z 3 ........................---,---. .............. CITy OF R~ECEIVED FEB 15 1994 ~,~,Ac~:,' "'.':'.% ': - ~=-~'v 'u.-~= ~EC~RDS ~K:n 8['u "~ 'X' ~X~ :,t=~ ~X :~X'!~TS ~EGZN~J:~G :~"'~'~ ~OX ® ~ ....~N ~:x ::':e: ~ 2~ ~LSO~gUSH :!'i!L:P~iNT CORP. :',"C~/e' :~",~. ~ ~- ~A~Aec~c~' ~::~'~:~ ~"~"""; ~' '~' ~' Fc'~a: ~ ~ uI'NTP'o~' ::;V'~cc :NS. -.~.io~ .~/2~1~ F:2:e:: 32 ~,~x~C C~/e'le~ '2129te3 ::':e~: ~ ~iGENT~ ~c Tu= UNIVERSITY ~c :~LEORN'.A ~' t~' ~"' '2/29/e3 ::'~er ~ 39 SAL'S oIZZA ~,'~!,/9' '2/29/93 ::~ds: ~ 39 SECU~ZTv °AC:=:3 ~A':UK~L ~ANK ~',/~,/8' ::'der ~ ~ ~!NUTE~-RANCHC :UCAMONGA RDA g*,'~:/e~ ~2/29/~3 :::de:" ~ :RA ~, ~n~/~, !2/29/93 :c'ce~: " ~ nc ~A~u~ CUCA~ONGA 91191181 12/29/~3 :s~ce~ ~ ~e C~ITTEE ~E~ERS CHAISES 3'/9:/~! 12/29/83 Fc:de2 ~ ,n -,a: ~At:v OcD~R, O!/01/S! !2/2g/e3 ::'de: ~ 5~ vt'~lICiP~L SERVICES. iNC. Y/S!/~! !2/2gR3 c::~e2 ~ 52 STATZONER'S CORPORATION :','~I/~ ~2/29/93 c:Tder ~ 53 U.S. P~TAL SERVICE Q:/Q~/el ~2/2g/~3 :c~de: ~ 54 9. ~ILLI~ P~INTING 31/0119! ~2i29/93 ::l:s~ = 55 ~.C. R9A 9ANK STATEMENTS 199!-92 ~'/~'/~ !2/2g/83 =c:Cs~ ~ 57 FiN~C!AL REPORTS - RCRA Cil~!tS! !2/29/~3 · RECEIVED .... ':: ~A>~C"'9 :,C!"C',1~ jtTy OF RANCHO CUCAM ONGA ':~. ':.~::x FEB 15 1994 ':~:*~ ::~2S:'::'~ "*?: ~'::R~ '~:S ~L~C~' ~:~'~ *': '~ :^u9*" ~ A2C2E SAVINGS & !,C~NS ~./n~,Qc F^]de2" ~ ArtllANOcn SAVINGS & LOANS ~'/"~/2~ ~2/~n/8~ :::de~ ~ ~ ~rS~A~= SAVINGS ~ LOAN ASSOC, C'/0:/25 12130/98 Fc]~er ~ E AMAOOR I/ALLEY SAVDiGS 5 LOA~/ :11C!192 !2/3S/2S =^u,. , ~ AMERICAN ~^~cR~c NATIONAL SANK Folder * ~ AMERICAN 21VSRSIF!S2 S VINGS SANK -,/~to= :2f3,n/22 o.~e. ~ * iNTERSTATE SAVINGS F:~dar: 9 AMERICAN SAVINGS 3:/~!I~5 !2130ie2 F:*der ~ '2 AMERICAN ~EST SANK 2',/C!/~5 !2/30/~2 F:l~e~" :! ANTELOPE VALLEv qAWN~ n,/n~/Qq :::de~ ~ 12 ANZ CCRP, ~"~'/*" !2/3C/29 %. Fci~er ~ !2 ARRO~HEA~ SAVINGS 9!/~!/9E !2/3~/~ ~ :cider ~ !~ ~TLAS SAVINGS & LOAN tcMo:Rc OF AMERICA - ~,~cca~ ~/n,/25 %-~._ FcIdar ~ ~E 2ANK OF AMERICA. ~2 e!/9!/22 !2/39/2P. (3 c:]~er" lc SANK ~c AMcR!~A ~*lnt/*S !2/30/29 :s'fer: !~ SANK n= NEWPORT C!,/~!t2E !2/30/2S :sALe. ~ !9 THE ~ANK OF NEW YORK ~!/0!/85 ~2130/82 ::':e~ ~ 27 SANK OF SAN FRANCISCO ~',t9!,/~2 !2/23/28 :::~er; 2~ SANK OF. SAN RAYON ~!/0!/85 ~2/30/8e Fs!der ~ 22 SANK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ~!,/~!/~5 !2/3~/9S Fsldet z 23 SANK OF WHITTIER 9!/?/25 !2/20/92 :~ "; }~ ?AY VIEW FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN 2'/~!/~2 ::1:.. - ~ o:R~,cR, v HILLS SAVINGS 2!I~!tEE 12/2012e FcldeP ~ ~c ~RcN~'~~n SOUARE SAVINGS ~!/n!/,~ ,~/~n/~9 - ::!for Z 2~ SU"ERRIEL2 SAVINGS & LOAN :1/2'/2S 12139/22 ..................... ;7 ..... ..... 57 ~Sc. ~ -,-: ...... : 'ITYOFRANCHOCUCAiWON " ' ...... CITy CLERK GA ':"'£ : ':~': "' ............................. FEB 15 1994 *-:': '*:'~ ....,, *_:,1 .~E-!j~N -~:..- ~::~* ~-,:~ "' %~ .............. ::':s~ = ~' :~','~ ~'/: '~5 ~ _C,~ ::':?~L~ E::C~:2C 5 & ,': "." := :s'~er ~ c~ ---v =u .... ~ LeAN ~SSCC. ': ~.' "/:V~5 .............. , . ,_ 12/3C/~ :C~5CL:DArED cAV'N~ ~ANX ', ~. 3EL AMO SAVINGS & LOAN nn~N=~ 5AVENGE & LOAN Acc~'A EMPIRE NAT:CNAL BAN~ ;nUrtCn SAVINGS ~ANK ESCONOZDC SAVINGS & ~A~ =~ERS ~AV'"~c ~ANK :'~' :C~E%:AL ~NK ..... CiTY OF ~ANCYO SUCA~CNGA 9estr:cticn Nct!ficati:n Reccrt A~BVED -~'~ "=~= .......=~" ~s~ "~'= ~:~' ='~"~' '~ '=s ?~cc~sFEB 15 1994 "~CNT~S,"~iCC~?5 ~'2~ ~i ~C' ~E~. ~A~ E 2Ei'~O~!DTM, ~ceDil~;~2i~12'i'23:45 ' ~ ]A'E~ ~ii~ANENT ~ECOR9 ::~8r ~ 2~ ERST S:ERRA =AN~ :C::~' * ~: ='A~cu~ FEGERAL :AVtN~ & LOAN ::!dar ~ 25 :RESNC ~AN~ OF COmmERCE 2~t~!,/e5 12130189 Folder ~ 2~ cCUN~ERS SAVINGS 2:/3V~5 !2/GO/8e =-" ' $ATEWAv SAVINGS ~ANK Fc~er ~ 29 mnoA~ SAVINGS =ANv ~/"'/~= 12/30/9~ ::'.der ~ 30 SOLDE~ PAC:EC 9AN~ :VG!/S5 12139/98 :4~e. ~ v ~n, ~cN PACIFIC SAVINGS i LOAN 0!/?/85 :2/30/~ colder ~ 32 SOLDEN SECURITY T~RFT & LOAN ;cl~e? * ~ GUARANTEE SAVINGS 3:/?/95 'W3nl~° ::!Jet ~ 3~ ~!LTCN SAV:NSS ~ANK 2'1~%/S5 ~2/30/8S c~14a. ~ ~: UTnnCU VA~, cv NA'iCNAL SANK n~ 'n'/B: !2/E/Bi ::l~sr ~ '~ u~.c :EGE~AL 3:,xC'./95 12/30/8B F:!:er" ~' ~O~E T~SFT ~ LOAN .... !2/GO/Be . ~. ~. m/B. ::'.der ~ 39 HO'JSE~OLD ~ANK g*tO!lB5 !2/30/~B Fc!~er ~ 3g ~'JNt/NSTCN SAVINGS ~ LOAN ISSOC. ?/3!/!5 12/30/9~ ::'~er ~ ~0 ]~ CORP. 0!/~l/~S ~2/30/88 Fc!~er ~ ~: :CA ~O~TSASE CORP. 0!/0~/95 ]2/30/88 Fc!de~ ~ ~2 :~PE~IAL SAVINGS ~I/SV~5 12/~0,/S8 :s!der ~ ~ ~vocR~A' THRIFT & LOAN ~n~/o~ !2/2~,/~ :older ~ ~4 :NLAND ~A~"'cS & LOAN =:~e' ~ ~= 'u~cRNATmNA' SAVINGS 9ANK =:~on ~ ~5 INVESTMENT SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION ~/~!/95 !2Re/98 =.:~.. ~ ,, INVESTOI THRIFT '~"'~"~ '2nn/8° ::::er ~' ~ IRVINE CITY SAVINGS F:!~e: ~ ~9 LA CUM8~ SAVINGS 9ANK :~'~,, ~ ~n LAKE SAVINGS & LOAN ,,/~,/oc '.2/~0/~8 ::'Jer ~ =~ LINCOLN SAVINGS Fcl:er" ~ '~N~ ~EACH S '.NSS & LOAN '~'/~/~ ~ ' ~_~G,~, ,: '. / /---:---: ~ .... ua.~: ....... N~ .....~ Date: ASS;. C:: A. ~,,:~ ::'Y O~ ~ANC~O .................... O RECEIVED "':- '* ,~ ,r. "' f F RANCHO CUCAMON ";:,' STU N FEB 1 S 1994 ~:%~: 'jR~"'~'~' 'c~F~RA '~'NTV NATIONAL ~, :v XA*:~NA'_ ~A'w ,,;,lm NAT:JNAL ~A~'~ "~"/~: '~1~/~ T~I-VALLETM NATIONAL ~ANK. T~HCE S~VZNSS ~ LOAN SUNWEST q~N~ "~,'~'1~ ~/~/o8 SUN SAViNgS STOCKTON SAVINGS FLOW INI/ES~MENT RECORDS ~! ~/8c ?OA'E ,tANK FZLEG 2'/9T/~5 !2/3~/e8 2 LOG ANGELES FEDERAL GAVINGE 3 MALAGA SAVINGS ~ LOAN AGSCC. C1/0!/e5 12/32/98 - MANHATTAN SAVINGS & LOAN 5 MANILA GANK, OAL~FORNIA 31,tD!/B5 5 MANUFACTURERS HANOVER MORTGAGE 3!/0i/H lR/30/H ~ MERCHANTS BANK Ol/C:/SS 9 MERCURY SAVINGS & LOAN ~G MERIT SAVINGS BANK :!,/~:/~S 12/30/88 :1 MITSUBISHI - LOG ANGELES !2 MiTSUI MANUFACT~RERG BANK !' MT. · ~ WHITNEY SAVINGS & LOAN '~ MUTUAL SAVINGS '= ~'A~'^NAL BANK OF LA jOLLA '5 ~!EN ~MERICA SAVINGS '? ~ORTH AMERICA SAVINGS 3','C!/85 !2/30/B8 18 nRAN~c COAST 5AVZNGS 3','C1/85 12/33/?~ ::-Y OF ~ANCHO C%iNONGA ~ RECEIVED ',,~-~. ~ ',-:- "':9/93 r, AMONGA ..... '" ~ CLERK ~:%. '::~:~5: -'= = ..... ',:: FEB 15 1994 '~:'; :"S~CST"'N ";oN ETURN =~'c RE~CR'. ..... c~ ~E ~ECORCS :?T: ~'~ ~c)T ,A~c, :"""'C: ::'nr ~ 22 ~'*'::rR SAVINGS & LOAN :cider ~ 2~ a~ESIDIO SAVING & LOAN ASSN. ::'~er ~ 2S ~AMCNA ~AVINSS ~ L2AN ::':a~ ~ ~o ROYAL ~AK ~AV'N~c & LOAN ~ccn~ :c'~e: ~ ~e cAN ~, :rouT: SAVINGS 5 LOAN AcE Fc'der; ~e SAN jOSE NATIONAL ~ANK 3"Ie7195 12130199 ~:~or: ~; SANTA SA~ARA 5AVINSS C:/01/~5 !2/33/9~ :c]:er ~ ~2 SECURITY oACIFIC ~CRTSAG~ CORP. 9117./S5 *2/3~/BB -:~87 * ~ ~[CUR[~v oACIF[C NAvT~NA' ='NK C'/C~/S5 12/30/S8 :~der ~ 2~ SECURE SAVING5 3'/01,/95 12/OO/S8 -:]de"; 35 SieRrA =EOERAL ~/01,'8~ 12/30/SS :c'.der ~ 25 SiErRA THRIFT ~!/:~/~5 :2/30/S8 Fc'!am ~ ~' 5ZGNAL SAVINGS & LOAN "'/"~/~t =older ~ 39 SOUTHWEST THRIFT & LOAN C!/CI/~5 12/3Q/88 ~/.~ ::~er ~ ~9 STATE SAVINGS & LOAN ..... !2t3O/S8 :cider ~ *~ :T -=W,n: LOAN , ,.A .... 'HRI:T & :-~er ~ ~2 E'ERLING SANK ]1,/2:/~5 ~2t39/~8 =:~9~ ~ ~3 WASHINGTON SAVINGS & LOAN ::':a~ ~ " ~r"S FARGO BANK ,,In~/. ~2/3S/89 ::l:ar ~ ~5 NESTE~ FIN~CIAL SAVINGS BAN~ C!/O'./9S 12/3~/88 F:':a~ i S5 NEST~KE THRIFT & LOAN :c=~s= * *~ HEST~KE THRT=T ~ LOAN ~. ~. ~o= !2/3~/98 ::!~er ~ ~8 NEST~RT SAVINGS SANK :sUet ~ 49 NESTNOODSAVI%S O!,'O!/S5 :2139/88 :,,~,. , cn ;(L~ING'CN SAVINGS & 'nAN :.:~,.. c, W'Su~Rc SAVINGS & 'nAN ASSN. Cits: SUS'-,N STARK. OFFICER ~ ......... ' .... , RECE VED .......... ::"':'~:;:' ~::': ..~VOF '~S_-': : 2;'=_: "'2.='LTM RANCHOCUCAMONGA --,,: .... :!- CITy CLERK --~: ::r::-::,. --~,: :r.~ --:s, ~P:v. s:~',~: -: -< ~s::::sFEB 15 1994 2:__ '~. :'~ ~ ~ " .................. LEDGER & 'n"RNA' ~'/n'/o8 ~:n~/o9 ,~, =c:, ** o~o :3-22-22 ~ ~e-'og~ CIR REV~N~E LEOGER CASH R[C[IPTS NOV ~8 - ~nN~HLv R[FN' e :nG: \O~D~ ::]:e: = SE~ERA!_ LEDGER 5t~C199. fWANG~ 07/Q]/~8 D5/~0189 ::'~e~: :,'L '~i~L aALAEiCE. ;'jL'~ - DEC :eS? f:v SS,'S9! :~./0%'88 051aOIS9 ::::e-: ~ S/L 7~,:AL ~ALANCE. JAN - JUN 1999 ,cv ~/~ ...... 07/~:,'89 05/30/99 .~,'/~,' :; ,,, :a:a: SL'S/~: :TAR}':. OFF:CSR ]~:~: ASS'. C:'v ~"~E" RECEIVED .... ' '%' s, ANCHC C~CA~C'J!'-~ 'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~ ........................ o=---- CITYCLF, RI( ~AOE: 'e :A'E: ':' :' ee FEB 15 1994 '=: :C',',D',';:",2 =-","'~,,c iRE SCHEDULE: .-'JR ,,cro',.'~'~",',, '>~ :A~c '-E:TM 2:=~9S1'::'~ '=:'N ~E"JR~ ~HIS REPDR'. ~'.:'ME:. '2 'XE "'~:AGE~P:' ':"!:"' ;.~. ~ET,~ZN.-=OEi -r_~,',o:'~ ~AT',~: ,';7' "" 'X' .................. ,~ ..... ,'E~r - ":' ZO' N'-:ei: ;i~4NSE "~2_ iC'RT: ~ugNi: (X'. EVO!' _%'Y, SON'ENrE EES!~HI~29 ENDiNO COX '~C. ' ' ~ ENC'j~ERANCE5 ~8/H 2/:!/?~ 25/20/~9 ~ ~ 3~v~OLL JOURNAL ~8/~9 }7/0~i'~ ncnn/~9 ~ ~ ~CjL'ET:NO jOURNAL ~e,z~9 :?/C'i98 05170/°9 ' : '~ ~ ' SENERAL LEDGER ' 2L/39/99 g4t30/90 I 3 .~A~S ~:~nRr~ U30t90-5,/30/90 '2U30190 n4/°n/gn ; ~ WANE EXPENDITURE 4130/90. :'jND I ONLY. ' OF 2 ~/30190 04/30/90 .... I = ;'~G EXOEND!TURE 4/30/90, FUND ~ ONLY, 2 OF 2 O4/Ee/gO 04/30/90 ;:~cR & 'n"R~'A" n:n!~gn n:/l~/gn . uc=n . Q:, !5-02-02 I n:-lge2 GENERAL LE~SER m :5/3!/99 25/3!/99 WANG EXPENDITURE LEgGEL =/~'/on !0= ~ :5/3!/90 no/oVen WANG EXPENQ!TURE LEOGEL 5/3!/90.2 0:2 :E/37/90 95/3!Ig9 WANG REPORTS. 5/3!/90 25,/3'/90 25/3V99 ~ 2 ENCUMERANCE JOURNAL. ,,,,v ,ooe_rr=~,c ,DOn ,~ 07,/0!/~9 ~ = ~,~'c oAvA=, ~ ~CCRUE jOURNAL ,I, ~ ,co9_ !,,N~ loon nl/hi/qO 9!/30/90· ; ~ }AYROLL JOURNAL. ,,,~ ,9oo_uiNc !qqn n~/nl/~g n=/on/On 2~:s: 'SUSAN iTARK. OFFICER ~i~ ;"'/"'/"'~ " , 2atE: AEET. CITY i"'-; 0 RECEIVED ::"' ^: ;~'.iC"O :';%"~>!:~ :"' F RA~.~HC? CUCAMONG.~ .... :!'-".: -:~-:: -:::~:,::: FEB 15 1994 ~:": '~':: :::'~:NT ~EC2~D "'~ .......... ~'~ ?:SSL'~SE"~EN' JCURNAL. j"J:" '~--"'~: l~a~ --,~,,~ :,~4 , ,, ~ l°°~'~'°~TA""~ .':URNAL. ."JLV '~%a-j'j'NE 'aa'~ ;,.n~_, ~?,l~!i;e '~X REPO~TS/vE~R-TC-DATE ~E'SZSTEL :'/:'/S5 THROUGH DECE~ER ~992 2'/9%/S5 !2/31190 ~ ~ 7AXE5~ ~/C!/e5 ~AXES: 3RD. ~TH ~9S9 ~D 9AvROLi 'C~t2 :'/S:,'eE !2/3~/99 EN~ ~=~AnR'5, vTn ~VcRT=~c ~NNUAL ~'/~"'~ ~2/~/Qn :NC:VZDUAL 3NENFZT ~REAKDO~N. 5'J~M~R 3'/e!/25 3ENEFZT. v~: EN9 VACA/SZC~/CO~P ~/,c '2/3V90 ac~nRT~ ~T 4,R 'oan ~ ,~,1~= ............ /.7 :2/2!/90 '~' "~'~¢ ~ ........' '~" :~~-7 Sara: SUSAn; 5TARK, C':F:C~R ~'sC~'Y'/ .... /"'/"' ...... AMONGA ees::'~:ti:,*. Nc~ifi:ati:m ~s:cP', CLERK ~AGE:'2 :~.'E: "729/93 ':,"E: '~:~:~?~ FEB 15 1994 ........ ~ ........ ~ ..... : .... ~' ~':' 9:*~R~: SC3~:~'OR: ~:.~. ~ :u:~,- ~9X CON~ENTS ~EG',NN~NG c~m~,~ BOX NO. LOCATION ~sx !2-~993 DATE SEN' "~' JFc!der: ~ ~2 CT~. :~°E 97/22/19~9 - :~oE e9t2~,':9~9 !!,/Q!/B? ::~da: ~ ~ ~TH 3T~. aPE ~9/98/!989 - PPE '2/17/~9e9 !!/9'./e? !2/31/9~ F:'.- ' 'S~ OTR. ;DE :2/3'./~989 - 2DE ~3/25/!99D 1!/2!/B? :cldar ~ ~ 3~9 STR, ~oE ~?/0'/!990 - PDE 9910911990 "1C%187 !2/~!/90 ::~der ~ 9 ,Tu nTR Do: ~,l~,l~ogn _ ooc ~2./C5/!990 ~""~t8~ !2/3~/ge :~,t/12--/¢~ .........: : : , 6~;"' Da:e: ' SUSAN STARK. OFECER ~' ='~G~BL: BOXES ON HOLD ~ BOXES NEEDING TO BE Rc"'RNEn =nR ncS~R'mr~O~ n BOXES rn oc ncS~Rnw9 ~,^,lu~;,g thcse which must 5e RETURNED) ~ t'?"v ,~c RANCHO CL"CA,~ONGA :Z!~!~CE .OU~N~'_E/LE;%i~S RECEIVED N:t:~;:~: ;:" ~ ::-: *' YY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA '~:: 'r: "':~ ,:~ CiTY C~ '-~ ::--:.."~ :~::::~ ~ ~;~:u._~: =-:~ :~r~L:'::'L ~'_~ :',:::r~FEB ~ 5 1994 , -; ,.: i:__" :'~' :iZZ:Zi Z2Ci22'~:72~: V:PL =i~!~NCE JDU'R~!ALS/LE:GER5 '!ECEIVED -< ::._,_::~,.:: ::;-.~ ~Rs =~.=~,, :~ :.-~ -:=-~ ........,, o. :~: :,~:::~-~FEB 15 1994 ~ i:LC' DALLY CAS~ _:ERRED " '2C?? ~EFERRE~ C?aE~SAT[9*! 5=AT?E~! Z!57 CV. ~":!'g3 !: 'E. ,oon/~, _ ,~_!98Q ~n~n , ~2/~!/oo 12-1992 9:25? DEFERRED COMDENSAT:CN STATE~EN 4151 ~""~ EX°EXD[T'jRE LEDGER. :g83/~: ' 2DOES ',~ANG EXPENDITURE LEDGER suit, s'~. D==:sER .......... , y RECEIVED C:TY 9F RANCHO ~UCAMONGA -. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ::!J~>jCE C':U:~i~,LE!'_:':'L:-:E CITy CLERK ~s:. 3 ::~: ":: :: FEB 15 1994 ~:L. ". ~*~' ~E'::~:3 ZCC~C:~,~'2R: B':~'. ~ ~ ~ SENER~L ':DSc~ ~ ~X 22225 SENERAL LEDSER/~ZAL ~ALANCE, ~'~ 22055 "TD REVENUE STATUS SUmmARY. ...... ' ........ ~9~..~ 95130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :[NANCE jCU~NAL~/LEDGE~S RECEIVED -. ~; C:: :%~i~CHO CUCAMONGA D~struct!:n NC~!f!:atisn Re:oft ~.~SE: ~ 3'E: "'3193 CITY C[.EqK FEB 15 1994 ~:~- : ~,:' ~c~. N~E: c:~ANCE .~-' :~a. P~CNE: !9C9)9~9-:~E~ EX': c::,E NU~EER .' ." 2EPT,/OcF ~EG:NNING >~YROLL DEDUCTIONS ~ ~U'HCRZZAT:ON OeCl5 o,.yROLL n=n,,n.,n.c VACATIONS/ 4!5! 29101195 nnn~, ~AY~OLL DEDUCT:ONE. VACATIONS/ ~'~I ..... Rcc'~.= . oDD ,., nn~q n~YROLL DEDUCTIONS ....... R QD/2U1989; 3RD OT~ F~. n,_n*_,~ -~ oDD ^~/no/,98o 4n4n: 09/30/89 nnn~O n~vRn" DEDUCTIONS REG:STER: >pc '2/!?/!g99: (-u n~R ~!~ =V 2!-02-C2. il DOe ,nlnq/~O~O _ ~n#n c 12117/89 20280 DEDUCTION tESISTER. !990 4!5! 0'/0!/90 =~ Ot*~!-OD. !4 !ST OTR 4n~n 5 I/31/90 !2-!993 90D~! DEDUCTION RESISTER. ?997 {!51 DiIC:/gD FM. 21-C:~33. !E 2NO 3TR 4040.5 ~2/~!/90 12-!993 :~2 DEDUCTION REGISTER. lgDO 4!? nnn~l ~EDUCT!ON REGISTER. ,DOn m!~, F~. 01-0!-03. !7 (TH OTR 4O4O.E !2/3!/90 VOID & HANDWRITTEN DHECKS. 198!/52 ~,~ n~/nt/qi Ci SUPo_E~ENTAL PAY REPORTS. 4~0.2 08/30/82 PAY~OLL ~EGISTEL ~!5~ 2' el/O!/82 THROUGH nS/l]/°n ~040.2 05/30/~2 SUSAN STARK. 3FF!CE~ ~: 2"'/"'/"'~"'~ .......... 3at~: ~SST. CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA ::~ZANCE jC,,RNAL,%'LECSE~S -,sYOF RECEIVED NCHO CUCAMONG :ss::,:t:: ~'c',i=;:,:;:- is::-: R~ITyCLF~rK , '>: '::'.~! FEB 15 1994 'uE :OL,:N:':'~ ?E:,'~CS ~,RE ~C'-'ETJLE: :"> :E,:':,:'::i ~"~Y29LL LAYROLL" ' ~' ~AYRCLL ~R~c 2O"RN~L, *~' ~7t9!,'~5 ?':= °AvRm~ JOURNAL & ~ETA:L. zv. U-2!-21. !0 !985/85 4O!O.2 05/3U~5 '25-'222 ",o PAYROLL oRSnc JOURNAL. :::29 oAYROLL ~ROOF JOURNAL, V5! 21~21/e5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA)ONGA :iNANCE JCURNALE/LE:GERS qECEIVED ............ FEB 15 1994 ~. i. ~. S :v t98!,"S2. ~15! 95129191 ~,_~..,n C5 jAN 'C .ce- THRSUGH n:~ ~o 4~70.~ '2/27/S2 ~2-1984 9. E. t. S., 3!/0811984 TO ~!51 ~/08/~4 nn no '2/~o/!Qo¢ InTn' 12/22/85 .,~7 O. {. R. ~., :AN ~!, ~985 TO 415! .... ~ REVENUE ..... LEDGER K^,~n~ REVENUE n~vAT' tg85/95 ~ =~. Z!_0!_03. n= /j~32S7 MONvuIvRcVcNn=LEDSER. /,~'~';~ '~ ~EVENUE LEDGER. SS/3O/!g90 ",CAT:ON 5 S:CK LEAlIE REPORTS ~:(~,, ~ ~ ....:~="' ,, ~::~c. r'~',v n~ ~ANCMO m~r'A.~nNGA .... ~ U ~ -: ;',: ,- -,. '-:: ~?x', ~':' :- ........... FEB ~ 5 ~994 ' %'-':t ;Z:Z'Z~'-Z'" :~ ':C~ ~:~E[' ""' E~ Z:X'3 '/:?~/~:Z(,"?Z*~ 35~:~'E~. ' ZL'3? - ':'*,,'c~ YE' '/~S~/SZSX/SD~P R:a'~';~ "'~/"~ '~ '~/'9~ ..... ,~ ,c- 3-~ ~9~' .2 1213:190 ............. , ............ ~,S- ~,'/w,,¢~ ~ ........,.__,, ~P~ it ....' ....'---' 'Data: S'ZSA~ ST~DX. CCcZCER Date: ED. :C~:NSL'EZ. _C'2R Date: .... .~:7'~'~;5~'~: "' :'CXES 'lEEDiNS '2 ,aE ~ET%'~NE2 =OR 2ES'RUCT:CN CITY OF RANCHO ~JCANONGA Destruction Notification Report PAGE ! ~ATE: !!/29/93 TIME: 15:23:240 THE FOLLOMING RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE INDICATE THEIR DISPOSITION THEN RETURN THIS REPORT, SIGNED, TO THE RECOR~ MANAGEMENT DIVISION (i.e. RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARKEO WZTH AN 'X' FOR · L'Z-i'_ ' MONTHS/RECOR~ MHICH ARE MOT MARKED, MAY BE DESTROYED) 8ILL TO: 5010 RECORDS COORDINATOR: TH~ON, LYNOA DEPT: 5010 OEPT NAME: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAIL SORT: PHONE: (000)989-1851 EXT. 2!53 MARK ................................................. DATES PER~ANENT RECORD CTR. OEST~Y RETRIEVAL BOX (X) EVENT ~X CONTENTS 8EGIMNIMG BOING 80X NO. LOCATION Box 12-1993 DATE SENT TO: [_[D/PAID i CANCELLED 8ONES &COUPO 01/01/93 12/30/84 942 07-05-02 5 06-1993 Folder I 1 mr, mm CANCELLED BONES m (CANCELLATION: 06-1983) 01/01/83 12/30/04 Folder I 2 SECURI~ NATIONAL 8MIK/SEATllE FI~T NATIONAL SANK 01/01/83 12/30/84 Folder I 3 RESIDENTIAL MTG REVENUE 8OND~ 1903 SERIED 'A' 01/01/83 12/30/84 ~ Folder I I INSUP. ANCE EXPENSE 01/01/03 12/30/84 Folder I. 5 RANCHO CUCAMONGA RSS REDIOENTIAL MORTGAGE REVENU 01/01/83 12/30/84 Folder I 6 80NSS 1884 SERIED 'A' EXCESS IRVESTMBT 01/01/83 12/30/84 FOldmr I T DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND 01/01/83 12/80/04 Folder I 0 COST OF IN~RANCE ACCOUNT 01/01/03 12/30/84 Foldmr I 9 NORT~DE LOAN FURCHASE ACCOUNT 01/01/83 12/30/04 Foldmr 8 10 8 OF A - ~ STATBBT 01/01/83 12/30/04 ]~flO ROA PROJECT FILED 01/01/84 12/30/81 946 01-05-03 1 12-1989 Folder I I BO RDA SUPPLEMENT TO EIR FOIl RDA PROJECT 01/01/84 12/30/81 Folder I 2 PREP'D FOR AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE RDA PLAN 01/01/84 12/30/81 Folder I 3~ SUNN RUSSELL, COPGraVEN & CO, [liC - ItUQ( 1981 01/01/64 12130191 Folder I i RESULUTZON NO. RA 01-11 ; 01/01/04 12130101 · Folder I S BO RDA RANCHO OEV~ PROJECT 01/01/84 12/30/BT. Folder I 6 REDEVELOPMENT PUN NIBIORENT NO. I 01/01/N 12/30/BT Folder I I ADOPTED 9YTHE RUCC. 01~110. OATE__ Ot/Ol/M 12/30101 Folder I 8 (2 COfiE8) PREP'O ilC RE~fVELOPMBIT 01/01/84 12130/81 Folder I 9 CONSULTANTS, ZNC 01101184 12130191 Folder I 10 NZSC'FIBIITO g NICIIOFILMED - O 0 12?-BT 01/01/84 12130101 Folder I 11' ~CSIIICI'!Illl)TIC~PLMI DIVISION, OR 84-02 01/01/84 12130191 Folder I 12 ' C~ICTIOII NOTICi PL~ DZVZSIO, OR 84-02 01/01/84 12/30/81 I_'~ M REDEVELOPME]IT AGENCY REF. PARE. 01101/02 12131/01 am HELD mcm 903 00-02-01 4 12-1900 Folder I 1 * REDEVELOPMENT AGE)ICY PLAN AMENI)IENT, 01/01/02 12131/01 Folder I 2 IEDEVELOPMEMT ASENCY Pt~ ~JENOREDT 01/01/82 12131101 Folder I 30 CITY _n)_J~IL/I~pMBIT AGENCY (JT MT8) AGEIDA 01/01/12 12/31/81 Folder I 4 PART I - I TN 8 01/01/82 12/31/87 PAGE: 2 DATE: 1!/29/93 T!NE: 15:23:488 THE POLLOWING RECORDS ARE SCHEDULED FOR DESTRUCTION. PLEASE [NOICATE THEIR DZSPOSZTZON THEN RETURN THIS REPORT, SZGNEO, TO THE RECORDS NANAGENENT O!V[S[ON I~.e, RETAZN THOSE RECORDS NARKED NZTH AN 'X' FOR · NONTHE/RECORDS NH[ON ARE NOT NARKED, NAY 8E DESTROYED} 8ILL TO: 5010 RECORDS COORDZNATOR: THONPSON, LYNDA DEPT: 5010 DEPT NANE: REDEVELO~ENT AGENCY NAZL SORT: PHONE: (9099989-1851 EXT: 2153 HARK DATES PERNANENT RECORD CTR, DESTROY RETRIEVAL BOX (X) EVENT BOX CONTENTS BEGINNING ENDING BOX NO, LOCATION BOx 12-1993 GATE SENT TO: Folder I 5 PART 8 - 91 THROUGH 8 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 6 TRAFFIC ANALYST 1982 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 7 TRAFFZC ANALYST 1986 01/01/82 12/31191 Folder I 8 8348 ARCHIOALO AV 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 9 E?O5 ARCHIBALD AV 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 10 9714 ARCHIEALD AV 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 11 12977 ARRDII 01/01/82 12/31/87 Folder I 12 9504 FOOTHILL SO 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 13 9554 FOOTHILL 80 01/01/82 12/31/61 Folder I 14 12615 FOOTHXLL 89 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 15 12105 FOOTHILL 80 01101/82 12131181 Folder I 16 10441 PALO ALTO . 01/01/82.12/31/81 Folder I T1 13286 PEAR CRT 01/01/82 12131181 Folder I 18 FENA 1980, A-I BOOK (1 OF 29 - 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 19 FENA 1980, A-1 800K (2 OF 2), A-2 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 20 1983 FE)qA RECORDS "'=: '" ' 01/01/82.: 12/31/11 Falder I 21 NIllUTES & TRANSCRIPTS; ALlGUST- 6, lfi? '- ':' 0t/01/82' 12/31/87 ' Folder ! 22 JOINT REDEVELONENT AGENCY/CiTY CINJNCZL NINUTES 01/01/82 12/31/81 Folder I 23 AUGUST 8, 1981: 01/01/82 12/31/81 I_] N REDEVELOFAENT AGENCY REF. PAPE 01/01/85 12/29/89 , 321 '18-02-01 1 12-1993 Pol.r 8 1 czvzc CENTU Pum ol/o1/. 12/z,/RD .~-Z _._ . . ~ ,:-~ - ... ........ _. :- .... · ,. LI Be REDEVELOPEXT ASENC'rREF.~PAPE "Q1/Q~/H 12/29/89 ' r.. 3H ' -.I, '16-Q2-Q1 2 12-1995 · Folder I 1 CIVTC'CBITEX PL.eS ·. 01/01,/85 12/29/89 I_1 X' RESEVELO~ENT AGENCY REF. PJLoE 01/01/85 12/29/89 329 16-02-01' 3 12-1898 Folder I 1 CIVIC CENTER PLANS 01lOTIeS 12/281RD ~87" ' LINDA ONIIB,S, Illit: ~es - ANAl,YET Date: - AGST, CITY ·., · .' "': .~,. :.,'~'-~-' ' -;'r". C. , · · .... .--~..:.. -...~ .:-.. .- CI~ OF RANCHO CUCANONGA D~truction Notification ReDoft PAGE: 3 DATE: !!/29/93 TIME: ~5:24:200 THE FOLLOWING RECORD5 ARE SCHEDULED-FOR DEST~CTION. PLEASE INdiCATE THEIR DISPOSITION THEN RETURN THIS REPORT. SIGNED. TO THE RECOR~ MANAGEMENT DIVISION Ii.e. RETAIN THOSE RECORDS MARKED WITH AN 'X' FOR ___ ' MONTHS/RECORDS WHICH ARE NOT MARKED. MAY BE DESTROYED) BILL TO: 5010 RECORDS COORDINATOR: THOMPSON, LYNDA DEFT: 5010 DEFT NAME: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAIL SORT: PHONE: (909098R-18E1 EXT: 2153 MARK DATES PERMANENT RECORD CTR. DESTROY RETRIEVAL 90X (X) EVENT BOX CONTENTS BEGINNING ENDING BOX NO. LOCATION 8ox 12-1993 DATE SENT TO: .... ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ............................ .................................... I_l M REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RB~. PArE 01/01/85 12/29/89 331 15-02-01 5 12-1993 Folder ! 1 CIVIC CENTER FLING 01/01/85 12/29/8R M REDEVELOI4ENT AGENCY REF. PArE 01/01/85 12/29/80 332 10-02-01 0 12-1993 Folder ! 1 CIVIC CENTER PLANS 01/01/05 12/29/89 _l M REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY REF. PArE 01/01/85 12/29/09 349 17002-01 I 12-1903 Folder I 1 CIVIC CENTER PLANS 01/01/85 12/29/80 N REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY REF. PArE 01/01/80 '12/29/89 3SO 11-02-01 2 12-1003 Folder I 1 CIVIC CENTER PLANS 01/01/05 12/29/80 M REDEVELOPRENT AGENCY REF. PA,~ 01/01/85 12/29/89 351 11-02-01 3 12-109B Folder 1+ 1 CIVIC CENTER PUNS - 01/01/85 12/29/89 M REDEVELDPRERT AGENCY REF. PArE 01/01/05 12/20/00 352 1?-02-01 4 12-1993 Folder I I CIVIC CaITB ~ ~;': 01/01/00 12/20/89 M REDEVELOPRENT AaBIC/REF. PArE 01/01/85 12/29/89 353 11-02-01 S 12-1993 Folder I I CIYZC CENTER PLANS 01/01/05 12/29/89 I_J X REDEVELOPRE]IT AGENCY REF. PArE 01/01/85 12/29/80 354 17-02-01 6 12-1903 Folder I 1 CIVIC CENTER PLNLS 01/01/85 12/29/00 -:, , ~:. ,,,. ,- . .,:,,::. :~ -- :, _ ---.:.-- , I_.J'/ i ---- I Oat OA DANIEL$, WlGR Date: .OLEN J(~S, ROA ANALYST DateT" ' ~SST. C~ f. :. , --- ;:. . · :. '- '~ '.: ~ ~: 2'~ "L~'~:: ' :'~.::j~:,'. ~ :' :.:: -:.: ....: - fly OF RECBVED RANCHO CUCAIdONGA CITY CLERK ...... -' ~""' ......*;""' ':: DEC 11 1993 -:,,_- ::~.-.:: 1718191101 Lit xt2,t 1L~lDf4~l~L~j "-E ;:'__':.,:'c- :':?%E ':,-: 5';~-E:'.'_E2 %: :-'_:':'.'C'::' '_E:EE ":"=Z'::':::Z5 .-::- ' :"' "' -':' "~ :: '::':""'=" E:._ %": :'~: :E;Z%E ;Z::Z:'-'°::: ':'5 X] EVE"' :""" ~':':~!': :::":' !' ~ :' ~*~': ~OX" .... ~;~'~ :"' ;:'~r -~ : .;F'::'!'! "L"_~:E ~? 2',':'.'75 -:!z,s:' ~ : ,'~-,;v ~'~ZC'( ~'/'~!l~'~ !~n!t~v/ '' -=~:s' ': ': 'DAR~E'!':'L ~F.:'- C','C',I.°' -:~:a* ' " ::c,S' :!L:=D~,N:.-' '~':'~E~"' :',':"F -~.'~, ~t "~ ~,,~L~ND ,;~MTry ,~!/e~!l~? '^""" 'I '~ %NZ~LEZ. A~'~unNv "'/^'/~'~ '2,17',/o.~.'/ -:'_;a~ -" '= S:,EEN, "~E'_:NDb, ?/2%,~.7 12/2'/??v/ ':':at -' '5 SROSSZ. JA~E5 $ JUDI ~'-~,?,/'2-'3-.~9 "~".~C':',I~"'_D :L":!/?? .2/2.77.o ~, ,4 t.l~%,,~ r~ _h:C /:{,c'/," --::aT -~ ~" HALLA~ ~, ~ATTE :*I;'/S' '2'/DVe!/, 1 " ~*: '~ .DES, HELEN ~'/~"~'~ "~'~'~'/ -' as' '- '" 'MAAS. ROBERT j. C',g"'~.~ '2/3'!e.~/ ":sT: %2 ?ELERO. ALeERTC I1. :./:.,/Q/, --:? z 2' "':L__'.?,. KENNETH ~IT:MZT'_' :"C'.'S' ='De" * 27 ~L=RDHY ~q!JC~i D'/DV?'~ --':'.'a' .,.2'- ~"'~ ':H,~RLES ~'~/~' !2/?'/.~?v' .z.:_... .,~ SD'Ri,,RS*-,. VI%E>F ~' "' '~" '2,'3'/~.'Y/ "- De' .'z 2'= i'EE'D.'.*~_. .":~':~ 2./~,/.o? _..,;-,z_, ......,__,, .................... D-*ta:R A Data:: .......jEZ. 2 R_ '37 2at_*:ASS'. C:7 78 ^"v ,,, ~ANC~O D~gA.~ONBA DEC 1 A 1993 ':%: '-:'.-'::St jTislDj tol ui lZI ......... "' .... ""-"~ '~E"."~I 'u;E REOCRT. -,,:,,;or, 'C %E - ............... s ........ RECDR2S '*~R":E; 'j"' ' '*CN~E/-',E~CR;E '~= T ;;:; E '!D~ >'kRXEC, ~A~ EE E:'_'_ 'C: uE-* RECORDS DOC%%~N*-TC~: 'FE ,::)- : ,-:~ ':~' v~;. ~:EK ~Gc'~cN~' ~:'_ ECRT: ounNc. ._. - ...... . ,. ~:" OrES ~ER:~ANEN? RECORD DTR. DES'~Ov (X'. :II':'N~' EOX ""N':~!'c EEG'iNN!NG .'~,ln'~ ~OX NO. LOCAT:D~j ~'~ !2 BELTER. ~NCRE~ TEST:NS Y/D'I~5 :2,/29/9~ DCRRES~CNDENCE RECEIVED !g~E ~%~0!/~5 .-nRRcconNncNCc Rc~c~l/c~ ,g,~ ~,tn,/~c t2/29/9! CCRRESPONDENCE RECEIVED !989 2*/Oq/S5 !2/29/9~ ~RRcconNncN~c Rc~cnlc~ 'co~ n~/~,f~c !2/29/9! :ORESPCN~ENCE RECEZI/E~ ~gDl ,nV?/S5 !2/29/9! CORRES°ONDENCE SENT !9~5 ~1/~!/95 12/29/g~ 3CRREEPCNDENCE SENT !987 C~/Ol/eS !2/29/9! CORRESPONDENCE SENT 1De8 ~!/0~/8~ !2/2g/g~ ~nRRccDnNncNK'c S=N~ !gDg 2!/0!/95 '2/2g/9! CORRESPOMDENCE SENT !99C O!/O!/8~ !2/2g/g! :At,,,~v ,NSocpT~nN !gO! ni/n~/~ !2/29/9! ¥n~:Rn= VTPuAc) tCSTTN~ ni/nl/~( !2/29/9! PARK :NSPECT!ONS ~99! D~/O!/Si !2/29/9! RECREATION A~TOcN, REPORTS Igg~ n*/n~/~5 12/2g/°' SAFETY aROGRAMS 0l/~I/85 T2/29/91 SAFE~v COMMZTTEE ~EET:NGS 199! DI/~!/85 12/29/9! SAFETY TRAINING ~!/~!/95 12/2~/9! S~SPOENAS g:/O!/85 !2/2g/9! WAIVER~ C%/f/B5 !2/29/9! , . S R Date: ASST. CITY ATTORNEY ELT-IBLE BOXES ON =nXcs NccntNG vn BE RETURNED FOR ncS'R"rT'ON .nX~ ?n Dc DESTROYED ~""~"~'" those which ~ust be R=?"RNcn~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April.20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93- 142 TO INCORPORATE PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS AND SAIARY AND BENEFITS FOR LIBRRARY SERVICES POSITION FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 ' _RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council amend resolution No. 93-142 incorporating the personnel classification of Principal Librarian for library services for fiscal year 1993/94. ANALYSIS Library services personnel must be included in personnel classifications. These classifications have been established consistent with the existing classification system procedures. It is recommended that this resolution be adopted establishing the Principal Librarian classification for Library Services. Res 7ectfully subm~ · u: Ot C[ es Manager So/kls Attachment RESOLUTION NO. 93-142-C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-142 TO INCORPORATE PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR LIBRARY SERVICES POSITIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits, and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it competes in a marketplace to obtain qualified personnel to perform and provide municipal services, and that compensation and conditions of ~mployment must be sufficiently attractive to recruit and retain qualified employees; WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the transfer of City library services from the County to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1: Salary Ran]es ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES (Monthly Amounts Control Minimum Point Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Principal Librarian* 456 3,367 496 4,111 * Denotes Management Class PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT~ Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk 81 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,~ STAFF REPORT DATE: Aprfi 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councfi Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOCYrtfiLL MARKETPLACE) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for Community Facfiities District No. 93-3 {Foothfil Marketplace). BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS On December 1, 1993, an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facfiities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $4,825,000. On December 15, 1993, the City Councfi adopted Ordinance No. 518 authorizing the levy of a special tax in the district. Bonds were issued on March 15, 1994 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of certain pubhc improvements that are required for and will permit the development of the properties within the district. Whfie the property owners within the district approved the maximum rate for the special tax at $20,000 per acre, the tax rate that is needed to meet obligations for fiscal year 1994/95 is set at $14,670 per acre, This special tax shall be levied as long as necessary for each parcel of taxable property to pay for the facfiities and to discharge bond obligations and other debt of the district. Res u. wed. Ad~ a~ces Director RCD:IYB:Jmf Attachments: Resolution Annual Status Report Map A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARK~-x~LACE) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"). has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qvnll~ed electors relating to the levy of a special tax m a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 d the Government Cede for the State of Cnlifornia. This Conm~umty FacfiiUes District shall hereinafter be rderred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE) (hereinafter referred to as the "District"}; and WHEREAS, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Cede of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is destrots to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next NOW THEREFORE, 1T IS I-IF_$k~Y RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: ~: That the above recitals are all true and correct. ~ That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994-95 for the rderenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached. rderenced and incorporated in the Annual Status Report. ~ That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legl~lntlve body, and is not to excess d that as previously appn~ved by the q,~li~ed electors of the District. ~ That the proceeds of the speet~! tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs d the following, in the following order d prioritin. A. Payment of principal of and roterest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Necessary replenishment d bond reserve funds or other reserve funds; C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facilities and public sen, ices, and incidental expenses pursuant to the Act; and D. Repayment of advances and loans, ff appropriate. The proceeds d the spe,~=l taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. SECIION~ The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorera property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and same procedure and sale to cases of any delinquency for ad valov~n taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable sdminlstratlve costs incurred in collecting ally CITY COUNCI~RESOLUTION COMMUNrrYFACILITIES DISTRICT93-3 April20, 1994 Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. ~ The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes will become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected In a space marked "public improvements, special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the enct rate and ~mount of said tax, reference is made to the attached Annual Status Report. ~ The County Auditor shall then, at the close of the tax collectton period, promptly render to this Agency a detailed report showing the amount and/or ~mounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of makln~ any such collection. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 FOOTHILL MARKETPLACE ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1994 On December 15, 1993, the electors within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal mount of $4,825,000 for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the street, storm drain, sewer and water improvements. The district is bounded on the north by Foothill Blvd., on the east by Etiwanda Ave. and on the west by Interstate 15. The maidmum rate has been set at $20,000 per acre. This amount can be levied at a lower rate but cannot exceed the maximum tax rate as set. ~ YEtIR 1994/~ The first annual tax rate of $14.670 for fiscal year 1994/95 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $398,000. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS DEBT SERVICE $398,000 ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD $ 34,210 & LIABILITY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0 $432,210 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 0 INTEREST REVENUE $ 8,650 SPECIAL TAX $432.2 10 $440,860 814,670 PER ACRE _ BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councfi Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLLrI'ION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL LEVY WITHIN THE ALTA LOMA CHANNEL DISTRICT NO. 84-2, THE SIXTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK REFUND DISTRICT NO. 82-1R, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAINAGE DISTRICT NO. 86-2 AND MILLIKEN SOUTH OF ARROW DISTRICT NO. 89-1 WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Councfi adopt the attached Resolution authorizing an annual levy of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel for the costs incurred in the collection of assessments within the Alta Loma Channel District No. 84-2, the SL,-'th Street Industrial Park Refund District No. 82-1R, the Rancho Cucamonga Storm Drain District No. 86-2 and Milliken South of Arrow District No. 89-1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 8682 of the Government Code authorizes cities to collect an annual assessment fee of a maximum of five percent (5%) of the amount of installments and not to exceed sixteen dollars per parcel assessment for costs incurred in the administration and assessment collection. Rather than calculate the fee on a percentage basis, staff recommends that the City should maintain the current rate of five dollars ($5.00) per parcel. The requested fee will allow the City to recover funds for collection and management of assessment districts that are applicable to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915. Rancho Cucamonga's comprehensive management program including record keeping, cost management, payoff calculations, monthly financial reports, debt service schedules, as well as providing information to the public are funded from this fee. This fee is in place now to pay for administration and will allow the City to maintain the current rate and level of senrice. Respectfully submitted, Administrativ Se ces Director RCD;IYB:Jmf Attachment: Resolution A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF AN ASSESSMENT SURCHARGE FOR THE EXPENSES INCURRED IN THE COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS IN VARIOUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the City Councfi of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has heretofore undertaken proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and has confirmed assessments upor~'land within various special assessment districts (hereinafter collectively rderred to as the "Assessment Districts"); and WHERF_,AS. said proceedings provided for and the City did subsequently issue bonds pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915', being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said bonds representing unpaid assessments within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS. the City does incur necessary. administrative expenses in the collection of the annual installments Of the assessment within the Assessment Districts; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 8682 does authorize the City to establish an assessment surcharge to allow the City to recover its expenses of collection of said assessments: and WHEREAS. the City desires to establish such an assessment surcharge as authorized by said Government Code Section 8682. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: ~ That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: ~reasurer is hereby directed to add to the annual installment of assessments within the Assessment Districts a maximum of five percent (5%) of the mount of the mst~llr~ents and of the interest thereon, not to exceed the Treasurers estimate of the expenses of collection, and in any case not to exceed 85.00 per lot or parcel. Said expenses of collection shall include the necessary adrnlrtistrstive expenses of the City incurred in providing the County Auditor with current information regarding the ownership or division of the affected lots or parcels of land within the Assessment Districts to ensure the proper entry by the County Auditor in his or her assessment roll and the timely collection of the Assessment installments. ~ The above assessment surcharge. when collected, shall belong to the City and shall cover the expenses and compensation of the Treasurer incurred in the collection of the assessments, and of the interest and penalties added on to the assessments. 91 Resolution No. Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of Apxll, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor A'FfEST: Debra j. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBRA j. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Councfi of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a reguhr meeting of said City Councfi held on the 20th day of April, 1994. Executed this 20th day of Aprfi, 1994, at Rancho Cucamohga, C~llfornia. Debra J. Adams. City Clerk CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT , DATE: April 20. 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: RObert C. Dorninguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Special Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO SET ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WITHOUT AN INCREASE TO THE CURRENT RATE Staff recommends that City Council levy a special tax of $297.48 per acre by adopting the attached Resolution that establishes the annual special tax for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). BACKGROUND / ANALYSI~ In 1984 an election was held and the property owners within the boundary of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System} authorized the district to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal mount of $20,225,000. Bonds were issued in August of 1985 in the mount of $18,000,000 to finance the construction of the Day Creek Channel. In 1986, the area between Mfiliken, Rochester and Highland and the northerly city limits was annexed into the district. On April 1, 1992, the City Councfi adopted Resolution No. 92-079 authorizing the refunding of special tsx bonds for this district. The refunding bonds were issued in May, 1992 in the mount of $16,530,000. The maximum rate for the special tax was set at $550 per acre when the district was formed. Since the formation, the rate has been $350.00 per acre with additional funding being contributed by the Redevelopment Agency. However, when the refunding was done, the rate was reduced from $350 to $297.48 per acre which equated to a $52.52 per acre savings to the property owners. Respectfully submitted, A~dm'i~C~~r~ces Director RCD:IYB:Jrnf Attachments: Resolution Exhibit Annual Status Report Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 DAY..CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM ANNUAL STATUS REPORT APRIL 1994 BACKGROUND On June 26, 1984, the electors within the boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) authorized the District to incur bonded indebtedness in the principal amount of $20,225,000. In August 1985 bonds in the mount of $18,000,000 were issued to finance the construction and installation of public capital drainage facilities to serve and provide drainage protection to all properties located within the boundaries of COmmunity Facfiities District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System). In March of 1986 the area bounded on the west by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the northerly City limits, on the east by Rochester Avenue and on the south by Highland Avenue was annexed into the district. The first annual special tax rate of $350 per acre was set by City Council in Fiscal Year 1985/86. This rate has never been increased in the ensuing fiscal years. However, on May 5, 1992, the City conducted a refunding of this district. Bonds were issued for $16,530,000.00 to cover the remaining debt. The savings from this refunding were passed on to the residents and decreased the special annual tax from $350 per acre to $297.48 per acre. Under the Loan and Pledge Agreement the Redevelopment Agency contributes sufficient funds each fiscal year, that when combined with the special tax meet the requirements of the annual debt service payment. All phases of construction for the Day Creek Drainage System are completed. The construction contract was administered by the County of San Bemardino. FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 The current rate of $297.48 per acre for fiscal year 1994/95 along with the Redevelopment Agency contribution of $976,205 will provide sufficient funding to pay debt service in the amount of $1,777,385. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT PROPOSED USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS VJSES: DEBT SERVICE $1,777,385 ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL OVERHEAD $ 110,030 & LIABILITY DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 106.840 $1,997,445 SOURCES: DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS $ 30,000 INTEREST REVENUE $ 20,000 SPECIAL TAX $ 971,240 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY $ 976,205 $1,997,445 $297.48 PER ACRE (DAY CREEK CHANNEL) ----,',""' m_ g NOTAPART~G~OI4'I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,-~ CALI~I. INIA - --- I )- -- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, (hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body of the local Agency"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a Community Facilities District, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, TItle 5 of the Government Code for the State of California. This Community Facfiitles District shall hereinaXter be referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) (hereinafter referred to as the 'T)istrict"); and WHERF_,A~, at this time, bonds have been authorized for purposes of financing the project facilities for said District; and WHEREAS, this legislative body, by Ordinance as authorized by Section 53340 of the Government Code of the State of California, has authorized the levy of a special tax to pay for costs and expenses related to said Community Facilities District, and this legislative body is desirous to establish the specific rate of the special tax to be collected for the next fiscal year. NOV,r THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. ~ That the specific rate and amount of the special tax to be collected to pay for the costs and expenses for the next fiscal year 1994-95 for the referenced district is hereby determined and established as set forth in the attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A". SECTION 3: That the rate as set forth above does not exceed the amount as previously authorized by Ordinance of this legislative body, and is not in excess of that as previously approved by the qualified electors of the District. ~ That the proceeds of the special tax shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following, m the following order of priority: A. Payment of principal of and interest on any outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness; B. Nece~___~Ary replenishment of bond resex've funds or other reserve funds: C. Payment of costs and expenses of authorized public facfiities and public services. D. Repayment of advances and loans, if appropriate. The proceeds of the special taxes shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. 5ECI'ION 5; The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the ,~me penalties and same procedure and sale in cases of any delinquency for ad valorera taxes, and the Tax Collector is hereby authorized to deduct reasonable administrative costs incurred in collecting any said special tax CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION COMMUNITY FACIIATIES DISTRICT 84-1 April 20, 1994 Page 2 SECTION 6: All monies above collected shall be paid into the Community Facilities District funds, including any bond fund and reserve fund. ~ The Auditor of the County is hereby directed to enter in the next county assessment roll on which taxes wffi become due, opposite each lot or parcel of land effected in a space marked "public improvements. special tax", or by any other suitable designation, the installment of the special tax, and for the exact rate and mount of said tax, rderence is made to the attached Exhibit "A". ~ The County Auditor shall then, at the close d the tax collection period, promptly render to this Agency a detafied report showing the mount and/or mounts of such special tax installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected and from what property collected, and also provide a statement of any percentages retained for the expense of making any such collection. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUN[/~Y FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) EXI-IIBIT "A" The Community Facilities District has been divided into two zones: 1. ZONE 'A': General areas to be served by the drainage facilities, exclusive of Zone -B-' 2. ZONE 'qJ": A limited area, being only partially served by drainage facilities. Zone '~": consists of those properties bounded on the south by FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. on the East by ROCHESTER AVENUE, on the North by BASELINE ROAD, and on the West by MILLIKEN AVENUE. The rate, method and formula for the levy of the special tax for the respective zones, being Zone 'A' and Zone '~", is as follows, based upon an estimated bond amount of $18,000,000 payable over a period of twenty (20) years. ZONE "A': $297.48 PER ACRE. ZONE 'qJ": $297.48 PER ACRE FOR 190 ACRES. For the purpose of defining the maximum special Tax, "ACRE" shall mean acres contained in the area of the parcel as determined using the acres as shown on the latest San Bernardtoo County Assessors maps. 100 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wilt Jam J. q'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shell ey Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: RELEASE OF A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 5354 HAVEN AVENUE, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VISTA GROVE STREET AND HAVEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH RECOIENDATION: It is reconmnended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution releasing the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to forward it to the Recorder, 8,A~CGROUND/ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by the City Council on May 17, 1984 for missing off-site street improvements adjacent to the property. Conditional Use Permit 88-38 constructed the missing improvements which were accepted by the City Council on ~ I, l!3oi. Therefore, the lien agreement is no longer required and staff reconm~nds that it be released. Respectful 1 y submitted, ---~ Wil~ lain J. O'Netl City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw Attachment 101 RESOUUTIO. NO. O '7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM 5354 HAVEN AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 84-126 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on Hay 31, 1984, as Document No. 84-127728; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required due to insta~3atlon of the required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clark shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardtno County, California. 102 CITY OF . ~: ~/~a ~ ~ / ~ fi~,~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA T1TLFa ,~e,~-,~ ~r ~ ENGINEERING DIVISION F.,.~B'mrr: ",,q" ._ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director BY: Ingrid Y. Blair, G.I.S./Spectal Districts Supervisor SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EN'r~R INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR COMMUNrlY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 93-3 (FOOTHILL MARK~-i-FLACE) Staff recommends that City Council approve the contract with the County of San Bemardino for the collection of special assessments for Commumty Facilities District No. 93-3 (Foothill Marketplace). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Whenever a Community Facilities District (Mello Roos) is formed and approved by a City, the County requires a signed contract between the City and the County before they will accept any data for placement on the tax mils. This contract is similar to that used with previous Community Facfiities Districts between the City and the County. Respectfully submitted, RCD:IYB:Jw.f Attachment: Contract 104 CONTRACT FOR THE COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSHENTS The CounW of San Bemardino shall collect special assessments for the under-signed: 1. The following charges shall be made for the collection of special assessments or as~ssments or special as,v. ssment taxes: (a) As_~_~sments for any district, special district zone or improvement district ~hereof, not to exceed__ $2.00 for each parcel I~u'ing such an assessment. Co) Special assessment or special assessment taxes levied upon any land or real property by any city, county, district or other public corporation, officer or body, not to ex__ceed__ $2.00 for each parcel beaxzmg such an assessment. (c) Pursuant to Government Code Section 29304, such chaxJe shall be added to the mount of the assessment for each parcel bearing such an ass~smenL 2. This contra~ may be t~rminzted for any ensuing fiscal year prior to June 1, or the preceding fiscal year by giving ten days notice in writing to the other party. Signed and certified tha a copy of this document h~s beem delivered to the clmirman of the board. COLTNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~rlCnC Spx'oaX Clerk of the Board of Supervison By: Chairman, Board of Supervisors By: Dated: Dated: Attest: ~Agency: By: By: (rifle) (Title) Dated: Dated: ~Revised 2193) s:\wp\pt\forms\sacntrct CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager SUBJF_L~. APPROVAL OF TWO l .EASES BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FOR FIRE STATION NO. 4 AND FIRE STATION NO. 5 RECOMMENDATION Approve the Leases between the City and the Fire District and authorize the Mayor to execute. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In order to provide adequate fire protection services to the Project Area the Agency has purchased property and developed two fire stations which are in operation. The City is the owner of the Fire Station 4 and 5 improvements and properties. The Fire District is operating the facilities owned by the City. Because the District is a separate legal entity from the City, it is necessary to forrealize the Districts use of the facilities through a lease agreement. This will allow the District to use the facilities and continue providing fire protection services to the Project Area, residents and businesses of Rancho Cucamonga. Both Lease Agreements have the same terms which are for 99 years with an annual payment of $1.00 for each site. The District will provide and pay for all operations, maintenance, and insurance costs associated with each facility under the terms of the lease. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager Lease Agreements will be delivered at the meeting CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 ~F. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ~ ~ Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wil~ Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AN APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM PUND 12 - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ARTICLE 8 IN AN AJ4OUNT OF $326,000 AND AN AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION, PHASE I, LOCATED AT MILLIKEN AVENUE AND THE METROLINK RAILWAY TO RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION FOR THE AJ~3U T OF $3,119,728.70 ($2',836,117.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO N BE FUNDED FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY MEASURE I, ACCOUNT NO. 37- 4637-9326, STATE PROPOSITION 108 PASSENGER RAIL BOND ACT, ACCOUNT NO. 36-4637-9326, AND TDA ARTICLE 8, ACCOUNT NO. 12- 4637-9326 RECOIII~NDATION It is recommended that the City Council appropriate $326,000 from Fund 12- TDA Article 8 and accept all bids as submitted and award and authoPize ~or execution, the o tract for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station, Phase I cn Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bid~e~, Riverside Construction 3 I nd authorize the Administrative Services for the amount of $, 19,728.70 a ~irector to expend $3,119,72B.70 ($2,836,117.00 plus 1D% contin enc ), to be funded from San Bernardino Coun Measure I, Account No. 37-4631-9~6, State Pro osition 108 Passen er qail t~ond Act, Account No. 36-4637-9326, and TDA ArtVcle 8, Account No. ~2-4637-9326. BACICGROUND/ANALYSIS Per prevtous Council action, bids were sol icited, received and opened on Apt11 12, 1994, for the subject project. Riverside Construction is the a parent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $2 836,117.00 (see attac~ed bid summary). The En ineer's estimate was $3,000,00~r.00. staff has reviewed all bids received an~g found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, Will lam J. O'fl~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:dlw Attachment 108 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEmOLINK STATION PHASE I SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS PAGE la Engineer's Estimate: $3,035,171.00 DATE: April 12, 1994 Engineer's Estimate Riverside Const. Co. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Original Unit Tntal Unit Total No. ~ Description Quantity Measure Prices Authorized Prices Bid Prices Bid 1. Clearing and Grabbing I L.S $25,000.00 $25,000.00 S75,000.00 $75,000.00 $4,282.50 $4,282.50 2. Remove A.C. Pavement 27,161 SF $0.60 $16,296.60 $0.20 $5,432.20 $0.46 $12,445.71 3. Remove P.C.C.C. & G. 463 LF $2.00 $926.00 $3.00 $1,389.00 $7.91 $3,662.21 4.' Remove P.C.C. Crab 178 LF $2.50 $445.00 $1.00 $178.00 $6.55 $1,165.19 S. Remove P.C.C.D.A. 850 SF $1.00 $850.00 $0.75 $637.50 $1.64 $1,391.03 6. Remove P.C.C,. Sidewalk 1,885 SF $1.00 $1,885.00 $0.50 $942.50 $1.09 $2,056.54 7. Unclassirw. dExcavalion 21,000 CY $2.00 $42,000.00 $1.00 $21,000.00 $3.27 $68,733.00 g. Remove hisling Fence 100 LF $3.00 $300.00 $5.00 $500.00 $3.27 $327.30 9. Remove Exist. Landscape & Irr. I LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 $2,727.50 $2,727.50 10. Reloc~vide/PlantTrees 12 EA $150.00 $1,800.00 $250.00 $3,000.00 $545.50 $6,546.00 11. Crashed Aggr. or Slag Base 2,410 CY $28.00 $67,480.00 $26.00 $62,660.00 $16.09 $38,782.32 12. Sand 105 CY $30.00 $3,150.00 $10.00 $1,050.00 $17.09 $1,794.66 13. A.C. Pavement 4,100 TON $26.00 $106,600.00 $25.00 $102,500.00 $23.96 $98,229.28 14. Adj WV Box & Coves Io Grade 2 EA $100.00 $200.00 $100.00 $200.00 $87.28 $174.56 IS. , Asphalt Seal Coat 110,000 SF $0.05 $5,500.00 $0.30 $33,000.00 $0.07 $7,200.60 16. Adj. Water Meter to Grade I EA $500.00 $500.00 $100.00 $100.00 $327.30 $327.30 17. Adj. Fire Del. Ch. Vat. to Grade I EA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $654.60 $654.60 18. Adj. 2' R.P. Bkflow Dev. to Gr. i EA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $327.30 $327.30 19. Relocate Post Indicator Valve ! EA $500.00 $500.00 $550.00 $550.00 $872.80 $872.80 21. PCC W/6' 8 gauge wire Mesh 17,820 SF $5.00 $89,100.00 $5.00 $89,100.00 $5.18 $92,347.70 22. Adj. Se:wetCleanouttoGrade ! EA $100.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $218.20 $218.20 23. Catch Basin No. w=7' I EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $3,163.90 $3,163.90 24. Catch Basin No. w=14' 4 EA $4,000.00 $16,000.00 $5,000.00 $20,000.00 $3,982.15 $15,928.60 2,5. Catch Basin No, w--21' ! EA $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $100.00 $100.00 $0.00 26. PCC Collar 2 EA $400.00 $800.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $327.30 $654.60 27. PCC Retaining Walls 195 LF $30.00 $5,850.00 $35.00 $6,825.00 $49.10 $9,573.53 2,8. · Manhole No. I 2 EA $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,727.50 $5,455.00 29. Manhole No. 4 I EA $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,972.98 $2,972.98 30. Sewer Manhole, CBMWD 2 EA $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,773.13 $9,546.25 31. Sewer Manhole, CCWD 4 EA $2,500.00 $10,000.00 $2,250.00 $9,000.00 $1,636.50 $6,546.00 32. Concrete SItuctutes, Platform 690 CY $400.00 $276,000.00 $550.00 $379,500.00 $436.40 $301 ,I 16.00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I Page lb Engineer*s Estimate Riverside Const. Co. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Original 1 Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Authorized ' Prices Bid Prices Bid 33. Junction S~tucture No. 4 I EA $1,500.00 SI ,500.00 $500.00 S500.00 $654.60 $654.60 34. Track Protection Wall 271 LF $40.00 $10,840.00 $20.00 S5,420.00 $65.46 Sl7,739.66 35. Mnsonaty Block Wall 400 SF $60.00 $24,000.00 $25.00 $10,000.00 $15.27 $6,109,60 3~. Cud> Outlets I EA $500.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,727.50 $2,727.50 3/. Rolled Curb 10 LF $12.00 $120.00 $10.00 $100.00 $6.55 $65.46 38. 8' PCC Curb & 24" O,_,!!q 4,540 LF $10.00 $45.400.00 $6.00 $27,240.00 $8.18 $37,148.55 39. 6" PCC Dr. Approach 696 SF $4.00 $2,784.00 $2.00 $i,392.00 S2.45 $1,708.51 40. 8" PCC Dr. Aplm}ach 296 SF $5.00 $1.480.00 $2.50 $740.00 $2.73 $807.34 4L 4' P.C.C. Sidewalk 7,200 SF $1.75 $12,600.00 $1.50 $10,800.00 $2.13 $15,317.64 42. PCC Wheelchair Ramp ' 1,220 SF $2.00 $2,500.00 $2.00 $2,500.00 $2.45 $3,068.44 43. P.C.C. Cross Gullet & Spnndrel 245 SF $4.00 $980.00 $2.50 $612.50 $3.27 $801.89 44. 2"FCCCmbonly 195 LF $7.00 $1,365.00 $5.50 $1,072.50 $6.55 $1,276.47 45. 6" PCC Curb & :24" Gutter 679 LF $10.00 $6,790.00 $6.50 $4,413.50 $7.91 $5,370.72 46. 6' PC"C Curb 3,346 LF $8.00 $26,768.00 $5.50 $18,403.00 $6.55 $21,902.92 47. PCC Hards~ape 35,955 SF $7.00 $251,685.00 $4.75 $170,786.25 $4.36 $156,907.62 48., Colored Conc Stmc Plalfm'm 6" 15.415 SF $6.00 $92.490.00 $6.20 $95,573.00 $6.76 $104,270.14 49, Colored Cooc Suuc Phufmm 12" !,020 SF $8.00 $8,160.00 $8.00 $8,160.00 $10.58 $10,794.35 50. 6' PC(2 Header 692 LF $7.00 $4,844.00 $5.50 $3,806.00 $6.00 $4,152.35 51. PCC Slair~ 574 SF $12.00 $6,888.00 $50.00 $28,700.00 $13.09 $7,514.81 52. Ele~ltic Setvic~ Pad 21 SF $4.00 $84.00 $5.00 $105.00 $5.46 $114.56 53. 4" Crab Only 1,165 LF $7.00 $8,155.00 $5.50 $6,407.50 $6.55 $7,626.09 54. 5' x 20' Chain Link Gate Gate 2 EA $500.00 $1,000.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $654.60 $ 1,309.20 55. 5' Chain Link Fence 40 LF $15.00 $600.00 $20.00 $800.00 $10.64 $425.49 $6. 6' x 16' Chain Link Gal~ 2 EA $500.00 $1,000.00 $850.00 $1,700.00 $654.63 $ !,309.26 57. 6' Chain Link Fencz 1,981 LF $13.00 $25,753.00 $10.00 $19,810.00 $8.56 $16,965.98 58. Melal Handrail 516 LF $150.00 $77,400.00 $48.00 $24,768.00 $36.52 $18,843.75 59. Guardrail 400 LF $40.00 $16,000.00 $85.00 $34,000.00 $93.23 $37,290.38 60. Track Separation Fence 393 LF $20.00 $7,860.00 $40.00 $15,720.00 S55.38 $21,764.14 61." 18'" Dia. RCP 293 LF $56.00 $16.408.00 $30.00 $8,790.00 $31.64 $9,270.23 62. RnclangularPCCChannel 80 LF $20.00 $1,600.00 $20.00 $1,600.00 Sl96.38 $15,710A0 63. 24" Dia. RCP 345 LF $60.00 $20,700.00 $25.00 $8,625.00 $36.00 $12,421.04 64. 30" Diameler RCP 340 LF $80.00 $27,200.00 $35.00 $11,900.00 $44.73 $15,208.54 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATION PHASE I PAGE lc Englneer's Estimate Riverside Const. Co. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Original Unit' Total Unit Total No. Descriptioa Quantity Measure Prices Authorized Prices Bid Prices Bid 65. 48" DiameterCMP 48 LF $110.00 $5,280.00 $45.00 $2,160.00 $69.82 $3,351.55 66. PVC Water Piping 972 LF $10.00 $9,720.00 $13.00 $12,636.00 $10.91 $10,604.52 67, 3/4', r & 1 I/2" SL Writer Pipe 765 LF $12.00 $9,180.00 $15.00 $11,475.00 $13.09 $10,015.38 68. 8" CML & W Waterline 480 LF $25.00 $12,000.00 $30.00 $14,400.00 $24.00 $ I 1,520.96 69. 10" CML & W Waterline 1,484 LF $32.00 $47,488.00 $32.00 $47,488.00 $26.73 $39,666.58 70. 16' CML & W Waterline ' 304 LF $42.00 $12,768.00 $50.00 $15,200.130 $39.28 $1 i,939.90 71. Fire Hydrant Assembly w/GV 10 EA $2,500.00 $25,000.00 $2,250.00 $22,500.00 $2,509.30 $25,093.00 72. 8' Gate Valve 2 EA $625.00 $1,250.00 $750.00 $1,500.00 $763.70 $1,527.40 73. 10' Gale Valve 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,418.30 $2,836.60 74. 16' Gate Valve 2 EA $1,500.00 $3,000.130 $5,200.00 $10,400.00 $2,618.40 $5,236.80 75. Quick Coupling Valve 9 EA $500.00 $4,500.00 $100.00 $900.00 $109.10 $981.90 76. 2" Blow Off Assembly 2 EA $1,750.00 $3,500.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 $272.75 $545.50 T'/. I I/2" Backflow Preventer 2 EA $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $875,130 $1,750.00 $763.70 $1,527.40 78. Fitc Detector Check Valve I EA $10,000.00 $10,000.00 S8,100.00 $8,100.00 $3,682.13 $3,682.13 79. Remove 4" Blow-Off Assembly I EA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $218.20 $218.20 80., Jack &Bore 8" Casing 209 LF $40.00 $8,360.00 $150.00 $31,350.00 $76.15 $15,916.33 81. 8" VCP Sewer 8458 LF $34.00 $29,512.00 $30.00 $26,040.00 $19.66 $17,065.42 82. 6" VCP Sewer 84 LF $40.00 $3,360.00 $22.00 $1,848.00 $17.73 $1,489.22 83. Drinking Founlain Drain 2 EA $200.00 $400.00 $250.00 $5130.00 $ 1,636.50 $3,273.00 84. TemporatyCMPBasin I EA $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $1,581.95 $1,581.95 85. 2' Comercial Meter Service 2 EA Sl,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $654.60 $1,309.20 86. 4' Blow Off I EA $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.130 87. Redangular Drain Line 126 LF $10.00 $1,260.00 $40.00 $5,040.00 $19.64 $2,474.39 8& Etw, aseScwetLatcral 70 LF $30.00 $2,100.00 $18.00 $1,260.00 $16.37 $1,145.55 89. T.S. & S.L. @ Millikcn & 6th ! LS $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $123,108.44 $123,108.44 90. T.S. & S.L. @ Mdliken & 7lh ! LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $106,094.30 $106,094.30 91. T.S. & S.L. @ Milliken & Jersey I LS $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $120,899.17 $120,899.17 92. lrdgation I LS $31,000.00 $31,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $63,976.29 $63,976.29 93. Phoenix Canaricnsis 20" Br. Tmnl 8 EA $2,000.00 $16,000.00 $3,500.00 $28,000.00 $3,000.37 $24,002.94 94. Groundcover 1 Gal Container 3.496 EA $4.50 $15,732.00 $4.50 $15,732.00 $4.36 $15,256.54 95. Groundcover from fiats 7,062 SF $0.30 $2,118.60 $0.35 $2,471.70 $0.27 $1,926.16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE ld Engineer*s Estimate Riverside Const. Co. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Original Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Price; Authorized Prices Bid Prices Bid 96. Mulch 27,038 SF $0.10 $2,703.80 $6.50 $13,519.00 $6.22 $5,899.69 97. 5 Gallon Trees 63 EA S25.00 $1,575.00 S30.00 $1,890.00 $27.28 Sl,718.33 98. 15 Gallon Trees 50 EA $65.00 $3,250.00 $115.00 $5,750.130 $70.92 $3,545.75 99. 24" Box Trees 77 EA $225.00 Sl7,325.00 $225.00 $17,325.00 $120.01 $9,240.77 100, 5 Gallon Shrubs 1,192 EA $13.50 $16,092.00 $15.00 $17,880.00 $10.91 $13,004.72 101. 60-Day Maintenance Period I LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,309.20 $1,309.20 102, Soil Prep/Fine Grading 35,538 SF $6.30 $10,661.40 $6.35 $12,438.30 $0.20 $6,978.95 103, Traffic 5~ping Public Street I LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,569.56 $5,569.56 104. Trafl'm Signs, Public Sm~et I LS $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $2,516.29 $2,516.29 105, Traffic Striping Parking Lot I LS $3,750.00 $3,750.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,445,83 $4,445.83 106, Traffic Sip, Public Sueet I LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 52,727.50 $2,727.50 107, Plalfo~m Surface Striping & Mark i,050 LF $4,00 $4,200.00 $2.00 $2,100.00 $6.31 $321.85 108. Pedesltian Grade Crossing 2 EA $2.400.00 $4,800.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $5,236.36 $10,472.71 109. Tactile Warning Tile 2130 SF $20.00 $42,600.00 $15.00 $31,950.00 $18.59 $39,602.21 I10. Platform Conduit & Wiring Sys. I LS $217,300.00 $217,300.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $65,460.00 $65A60.00 Iil. Parking Lot Lighting Sysl~m I LS $36,100.00 $36,100.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $159,286.10 $159,286.10 !12., Ekclrical Savico I LS $15,700.00 $15,700.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $16,365.00 $16,365.00 113. Plalfotm&PlazaLighting I LS $58,200.00 $58,200.00 $215,000.00 $215,000.00 $163,650.00 $163,650.00 114. Canopy Wiring I LS $22,700.00 $22300.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5.455.00 $5.455.00 115. Connection to Commun. Bldg. I LS $14,350.00 $14,350.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,818.50 $3,818.50 116. 6' Altium Orates 5 EA $300.00 $1,500.00 $50.00 $250.00 $163.65 $818.25 117, Drinking Pounlain 2 EA $1,600.00 $3,200.00 $1350.00 $3,500.00 $2,727.50 $5,455.00 110. Aeralion well 40 EA $200.00 $8,000.00 $100.00 $4,000.00 $2,727.50 $109,100.00 !19. Provide & Install Benches 18 EA $1,100.00 $19,800.00 $1,250.00 $22,500.00 $1,963.83 $35,348.90 120. Provide & Install Trash Recep(. 12 EA $675.00 $8,100.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 $946.24 $ I 1354.83 121, Consmatt Main Sbslp~r I LS $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $87,595.30 $87,595.30 122. Consreset Small SheIra' 4 EA $27,500.00 $110,000.00 $20,000.00 $$6,000.00 $24,44140 $97,765.60 123. Coetsln~t Bus Sbslmr I EA $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $5,804.12 $5,804.12 124. Supercklonps I EA $1,300.00 $1,300.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00. $1,091.00 $1,091.00 125,' Stoeo Bollaid 12 EA $450.00 $5,400.00 $650.00 $7,800.00 $2,182.00 $26,184.00 126. Wigel Stop 246 EA $27.00 $6,642.00 $20.00 $4,920.00 $18.94 $4,659.66 127. Strum Wamr Pollution Protection I LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $5,455.00 $5,455.00 128. Additional Liability and 2 Fl~gmo~ I LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,910.00 $10,910.00 129. Storm Drain Energy Dispatcher I LS $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $100.00 $100.00 $10,910.00 $10,910.00 130. Communication Bldg. PCC Pad I LS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $5.455.00 $5,455.00 131, Redwood Header 28 LF $2.00 $56.00 $5.00 $140.00 $4.36 $122.19 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEmOLINK STATION PHASE 1 PAGE le Engineer's Estimate Riverside Const. Co. Martin J. Jaska, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Original Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Authorized Prices Bid Prices Bid 132. AdjuslGTEManhole I EA $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,091.00 Sl,091.00 133. Headwall Wing Type I EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 54,500.00 $4,500.00 $2,727.50 $2,727.50 134. Headwall Trash Rack I EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 52,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,727.50 $2,727.50 135. I/4 Ton Rip Rap 169 SF $29.59 $5,000.00 $5.00 $845.00 $10.91 $1,843.79 136. Field Office I LS $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,091.00 $1,091.00 137. i I/2" SCE SL Light Conduit 3030 LF $0.00 $5.00 $15,150.00 $9.82 $29,751.57 138. SCE SL Light Pullbox 12 EA $0.00 $150.00 $1,800.00 $103.65 $1,243.74 139. 2--2" GTECo~duit 500 LF $0.00 $6.00 $3,000.00 $10.91 $5,455.00 140. GTE Pullbox 2 EA $0.00 $650.00 $1,300.00 $1,091.00 $2,182.00 141. 4' PVC Structure Drain Line 400 LF $0.00 $25.00 $10,000.00 $27.28 $10,910.00 142. Install Aptenia 12" O.C./Milliken 1 LS $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,727.50 $2,727.50 143. Mod. Irrigation on Milliken I LS $0.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $8,728.00 $8,728.00 BID TOTAL $3,041,870.40 $2,834,816.45 $2,895,182.92 BID SUBMITIED $2,836,117.00 $2,934,764.29 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 2a Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Kruze & Kruze Construction Vance Corporation Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid Prices Bid !. Clearing and Gmbbing I L.S $90,000.00 $90,000.00 $51,620.75 $51,620.75 $138,287.00 $138,287.00 2. Remove A.C. Pavemeat 27,161 SF $0.16 $4,345.76 $0.35 $9,506.35 $0.15 $4,074.15 3. Remove P.C.C.C. & G. 463 LF $3.95 $1,828.85 $2.92 $1,351.96 $6.35 $2,940.05 4. Remove P.C.C. Curb 178 LF $3.77 $671.06 $2.92 $519.76 $2.80 $498.40 5. RemoveP.C.C.D.A. 850 SF $1.83 $1,555.50 $1.75 $1,487.50 $1.85 $1,572.50 6. Remove P.C.C,. Sidewalk 1,885 SF $0.65 $1,225.25 $1.17 $2,205.45 $1.55 $2,921.75 7. Unclassifw, d Excavation 21,000 CY $4.60 $96,600.00 $2.39 $50,190.00 $3.40 $71,400.00 8. Remove Existing Fence 100 LF $3.93 $393.00 $1.17 $117.00 $5.20 $520.00 9. Remove Exist. Landscape & Irr. I LS $1,590.00 $1,590.00 $2,915.60 $2,915.60 $1,415.00 $1,415.00 10. Relocate Exiting Trees 12 EA $270.00 $3,240.00 $233.25 $2,799.00 $260.00 $3,120.00 11. Crashed Aggr. or Slag Base 2,410 CY $30.80 $74,228.00 $22.39 $53,959.90 $25.15 $60,611.50 12. Sand 105 CY $101.00 $10,605.00 $62.20 $6,531.00 $113.00 $11,865.00 13. A.C. Pavement 4,100 TON $23.20 $95,120.00 $31.36 $128,576.00 $26.45 $108,445.00 14. Adj WV Box & Cover to Grade 2 EA $183.00 $366.00 $122. I 1 $244.22 $270.00 $540.00 15., Asphalt Seal Coat 110,000 SF $0.05 $5,940.00 $0.03 $3,300.00 $0.07 $7,700.00 16. Adj. Waler Meter to Grade I EA $80.97 $80.97 $348.89 $348.89 $70.00 $70.00 17. Adj. Fire Det. Ch. Val. to Grade I EA $1,620.00 $1,620.00 $1,453.69 $1,453.69 $1,560.00 $1,560.00 18. Adj. 2" R.P. Bkflow Dev. to Gr. I EA $405.00 $405.00 $436.11 $436.11 $180.00 $180.00 19. Relocate Post lndicator Valve I EA $945.00 $945.00 $1,017.58 $1,017.58 $415.00 $415.00 21. PCC Pavement W/wire Mesh 17,820 SF $6.37 $113,513.40 $4.71 $83,932.20 $6.00 $106,920.00 22. Adj. SewcrCleanout Io Grade I EA $54.00 $54,00 $122.11 $122.11 $270.00 $270.00 23. Catch Basin No. w=7' I EA $2,969.00 $2,969.00 $2,558.50 $2,558.50 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 2.4. Catch Basin No. w=14' 4 EA $4,275.00 $17,100.00 $3,256.27 $13,025.08 $5,910.00 $23,640.00 25. Catch Basin No. w=21' I EA $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $5,233.29 $5,233.29 $1.00 $1.00 26. PCCCollat 2 EA $390.00 $780.00 $348.89 $697.78 $356.00 $712.00 27. PCC Retaining Wails 195 LF $32.30 $6,298.50 $36.05 $7,029.75 $43.40 $8,463.00 28. Manhole No. I 2 EA $2,600.00 $5,200.00 $2,558.50 $5,117.00 $1,870.00 $3,740.00 29. Manhole No. 4 I EA $3,600.00 $3,600.00 $2,907.38 $2,907.38 $4,065.00 $4,065.00 30. Sewer Manhole, CBMWD 2 EA $6,900.00 $13,800.00 $5,233.29 $10,466.58 $4,835.00 $9,670.00 31. Sewer Manhole, CCWD 4 EA $1,700.00 $6,800.00 $1,744.43 $6,977.72 $1,460.00 $5,840.00 32. Concrete Stoictares, Platform 690 CY $421.00 $290,490.00 $435.29 $300,350. I 0 $370.00 $255,300.00 Pd~NCHO CUCAM ONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE PAGE 2b Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Kruze & Kruze Construction Vance Corporation Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Mensure Prices Bid Prices Bid Prices Bid 3.3, Junction SItucture No. 4 ! EA $945.00 $945.00 ' $552.40 . $552.40 $800.00 $800.00 34. Track Protection Wall 271 LF $21.30 $5,772.30 $17.44 $4,726.24 $31.00 S8,401.00 35. Masonary Block Wall 400 SF $17.00 $6,800.00 $18.43 $7,372.00 $21.50 $8,600.00 36, Curb Outlets i EA $2,800.00 $2.800.00 ' $2,325.91 $2,325.91 $1,125.00 $1,125.00 37, Rolled Curb 10 LF $19.00 $190.00 $15.12 $151.20 $10.40 $104.00 38. 8' I~CC Curb & 24' Guta~ 4,540 LF $6.70 $30,418.00 $11.89 $53,980.60 $6.85 $31,099.00 39, 6" PCC Dr. Approach 696 SF $2.00 $1,392.00 $3.11 $2,164.56 $2.90 $2,018A0 40. 8' PCC Dr. Approach 296 SF $3.95 $1,169.20 $3A5 $1,021.20 $3.60 $1,065.60 41. 4' P.C.C. Sidewalk 7,200 SF $1.71 $12,312.00 $1.87 $13,464.00 $1.95 $14,040.00 42. PCC Wheelchair Ramp i ,250 SP $2.04 $2,550.00 $2.72 $3,400.00 $1.80 $2,250.00 4.3, P.C.C. CrossGuuer&Spandrel 245 SF $4.10 $1,004.50 $4.55 $1,114.75 $4.15 $1,016.75 44. 2' PCC Curb only 195 LF $8.60 $1,677.00 $9.24 $1,801.80 $22.20 $4,329.00 45. 6" PCC Curb & 24" Gullet 679 LF $7.70 $5,228.30 $11.12 $7,550.48 $6.75 $4,583.25 46. 6' PCC Curb. 3,346 LF $8.30 $27,771.80 $9.24 $30,917.04 $9.15 $30,615.90 47. PCC Hardscape 35,955 SF $4A9 $161,437.95 $4.19 $150,651A5 $4.75 $170,786.25 48. · Colored Cooc Sltuc Platform 6" 15,415 SF $5.17 $79,695.55 $4.26 $65,667.90 $6.40 $98,656.00 49. Colored Cone Sltuc Platform 12' i ,020 SF $7.50 $7,650.00 $6.15 $6,273.00 $7.70 $7,854.00 50. 6' PCC Header 692 LF $4A0 $3,044.80 $8.49 $5,875.08 $4.70 $3,252.40 $1, PCC Stairs 574 SF $12.80 $7,347.20 $66.24 $38,079.16 $10.25 $5,883.50 52. Electric Service Pad 21 SF $9.10 $191.10 ' $16.18 $339.78 $26.00 $546.00 5.3. 4"CurbOnly 1,165 LF $11.80 $13,747.00 $9.24 $10,764.60 $13.85 $16,135.25 $4. 5' x 20' Chain Link Gato Oat~ 2 EA $431.00 $862.00 $697.77 $ 1,395.54 $4 15.00 $830.00 55. 5' Chain Link Fence 40 LF $8.10 $324.00 $11.34 $453.60 $7.80 $312.00 56, 6'x 16'ClminLinkOalo 2 EA $431.00 $862.00 $697.77 $1,395.54 $415.00 $830.00 57. 6'ChalnLiokFeoce 1,981 LP $9.60 $19,017.60 $9.13 $18,086.53 $9.25 $18,324.25 58. Metal Handrail 516 LF $33.50 $17,286.00 $41.08 $21,197;28 $30.70 $15,841.20 59, Guardrail 400 LF $72.00 $28,800.00 $81.77 $32,708.00 $159.00 $63,600.00 60. Track Separalion Fence 393 LF $37.50 $14,737.50 $56.1 i $22,051.23 $50.00 $19,650.00 61,' 18" Din. RCP 293 LF $29.00 $8,497.00 $31.51 $9,232.43 $37.75 $11,060.75 62. RectsngularPCCChannel 80 LF . $14.70 $1,176.00 $34.89 $2,791.20 $32.65 $2,612.00 63. 24' Din. RCP 345 LF $34.00 $11,730.00 $33.92 $11,702A0 $42.40 $14,628.00 M, 30" Dinmeier RCP 340 LF $34.55 $11,747.00 $37.21 $12,651A0 $47.75 $16,235.00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ME~I~OLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 2c Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Kruze & Krnze Construction Vance Corporation Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure . Prices Bid Prices Bid Prices Bid 65. 48" Diameler CMP 48 LF $52.90 $2,539.20 $56.98 $2,735.04 $79.00 $3,792.00 66. PVC Water Piping 972 LF $6.48 $6,298.56 $8.32 $8,087.04 $6.25 $6,075.00 67. 3/4', I" & I 1/2' St Walex Pipe 765 LF $7.56 $5,783.40 $12.61 $9,646.65 $7.55 $5,775.75 68. 8' CML & W Waterline 480 LF $22.68 $10,886.40 $48.84 $23,443.20 $26.50 $12,720.00 69. 10" CML & W Waterline 1 AM LF $24.55 $36,432.20 $46.52 $69,035.68 $23.75 $35,245.00 70. 16" CML & W Waterline 304 LF $38.85 $ I 1,810.40 $47.52 $14,446.08 $37.25 $11,324.00 71. Fife Hydrant Assembly w/GV 10 EA $1,800.00 $18,000.00 $2,907.38 $29,073.80 $1,795.00 $17,950.00 72, 8" Crate Valve 2 EA $700.00 $1,400.00 $872.21 $1,744.42 $442.00 $884.00 73. 10" ~ Valve 2 EA $1,620.00 $3,240.00 $2,093.32 $4,186.64 $930.00 $1,860.00 74. 16' Cmt~ Valve 2 EA $3,350.00 $6,700.00 $5,000.72 $10,001.44 $3,485.00 $6,970.00 75. Quick Coupling Valve 9 EA $215.00 $1,935.00 $174.44 $1,569.96 $198.00 $1,782.00 76. 2" Biow Off Assembly 2 EA $540.00 $1,080.00 $581.48 $1,162.96 $350.00 $700.00 77. I !/2" Backflow Ptevemer 2 lEA $540.00 $1,080.00 $872.21 $1,744.42 $650.00 $1,300.00 78. Fire Detector Check Valve I EA $5,398.00 $5,398.00 $9,303.62 $9,303.62 $11,900.00 $11,900.00 79. Remove 4' Blow-Off Assembly I EA $431.00 $431.00 $436.11 $436. I I $225.00 $225.00 g0. , Jack &Bole 8" Casing 209 LF $80.00 $16,720.00 $15.24 $3,185.16 $41.00 $8,569.00 81. 8' VCPSewer 868 LF $21.00 $18,228.00 $26.75 $23,219.00 $21.00 $18,228.00 82. 6' VCP Sewer 84 LF $20.50 $1,722.00 $27.91 $2,344.44 $31.00 $2,604.00 83. Drinking Fountain Drain 2 EA $570.00 $1,140.00 $1,889.80 $3,779.60 $365.00 $730.00 84. Temporary CMP Basin I EA $1,620.00 $1,620.00 $1,744A3 $1,744A3 $3,425.00 $3,425.00 85. 2' Comercial Meter Service 2 EA $755.00 $1,510.00 $697.77 $1,395.54 $390.00 $780.00 86. 4' Blow Off I EA $917.00 $917.00 $1,744.43 $1,744A3 $858.00 $858.00 87, Rectangulas Drain Line 126 LF $20.60 $2.595.60 $30.35 $3,824.10 $17.75 $2,236.50 g8. EncagSewetl~eral 70 LF $11.00 $770.00 $23.03 $1,612.10 $16.90 $1,183.00 89. T.S. & S.L. @ Milliken & 6th I LS $116,424.00 $116,424.00 $142,011.67 $142,011.67 $145,600.00 $145,600.00 90. T.S.&S.L.@Milliken&7th I LS $99,590.00 $99,590.00 $114,603.19 $114,603.19 $112,320.00 $112,320.00 91. T.S. & S.L. @ Milliken & Jersey I LS $114,240.00 $114,240.00 $122,326.36 $122,326.36 $128,440.00 $128,440.00 92. Irrigation I LS $83,450.00 $83,450.00 $68,195.56 $68,195.56 $89,815.00 $89,815.00 93. ' Phoenix Canaticnsis 20" Br. Trunl 8 EA $3,475.00 $27,800.00 $4,186.63 $33,493.04 $3,744.00 $29,952.00 94. Groundcover 1 CralContainer 3,496 EA $4.69 $16,396.24 $3.49 $12,201.04 $4.70 $16,431.20 95. Groundcover from fiats 7,062 SF $0.37 $2,612.94 $0.23 $1,624.26 $0.35 $2,471.70 RANCHO CUCAM ONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 2d Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. Kruze & Kruze Const. Vance Corporation Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid . Prices Bid Prices Bid 9(,. Mulch 27,038 SF 80.42 $11,355.96 80.29 $7,841.02 80.45 $12,167.10 97, 5Gallot~Trees 63 EA $31.00 $1,953.00 $29.07 $1,831.41 $37.45 $2,359.35 98. ISCmllonTrees 50 EA $115.00 $5,750.00 $75.59 $3,779.50 $115.00 $5,750.00 99. 24" Box Trees 77 EA $230.00 $17,710.00 $151.18 $11,640.86 $229.00 $17,633.00 100. '5 C_mllon Shrubs i,192 EA $15.00 $17,880.00 ' $11.63 S13,862.96 $15.00 $17,880.00 101, 60-DayMaintenancePetiod 1' LS $1,670.00 $1,670.00 $5,814.76 $5,814.76 $1,665.00 $1,665.00 102, Soil Ptep/Fine Grading 35,538 SF 80.32 $11,372.16 80.23 $8,173.74 80.31 $11,016.78 103. Traffic Striping Public Street ! LS $3,170.00 $3,170.00 $5,300.74 $5,300.74 $8,165.00 $8,165.00 104, Traffic Signs, Public Sm~et I LS $750.00 $750.00 . $3,345.82 $3,345.82 $3,830.00 $3,830.00 105. Traffic Suiping Pasting Lot i LS $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $3.420.24 $3,420.24 $2,665.00 $2,665.00 106. Traffic Signs, Public Sueet I LS $3,100.00 $3,100.00 $810.58 $810.58 $3,510.00 $3,510.00 107, Plalfo~n SmTace Striping & Mark 1,050 LF 80.27 $283.50 80.29 $304.50 $1.85 $1,942.50 108, Pedestrian Grade Crossing 2 EA $4,650.00 $9,300.00 $4,515.75 $9,031.50 $4,324.00 $8,648.00 109, T~tileWamingTile 2130 SF $15.60 $33.228.00 $18.61 $39,639.30 $22.10 $47,073.00 I!0. Platform Lighting System ! L$ $94,465.00 $94,465.00 $52,332.88 $52,332.88 $87,500.00 $87,500.00 !11. Parking Lot Lighting Syslem I LS $56,430.00 $56.430.00 $90,710.33 $90,710.33 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 112, Elecuical Service ! LS $17,538.00 $17,538.00 $54,658.79 $54,658.79 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 113, Platform &Plaza Lighting I LS $245,000.00 $245,000.00 $246,546.01 $246,546.01 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 !i4. Canopy Wiring I LS $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $13,955A3 $13,955.43 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 115. ConnnctionloCommun. Bldg. I LS $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $3,256.27 $3,256.27 $1,620.00 $1,620.00 116. 6' Airlure Grate~ 5 EA · $11.00 $55.00 $250.03 $1,250.15 $23.65 $118.25 117. Drinking Fountain 2 EA $1,619.40 $3,238.80 $2,762.01 $5,524.02 $624.00 $1,248.00 118. Aexa~onwell 40 EA $100.00 $4,000.00 $116.30 $4,652.00 $104.00 $4,160.00 119, Provide & Inslall Benches 18 EA $1,250.00 $22,500.00 $1,453.69 $26,166.42 $1,318.00 $23,724.00 120, Provide & Insill Trash Recept. 12 EA $690.00 $8,280.00 $863.30 $10,359.60 $892.00 $10,704.00 121, ConstmctMainSheltet I LS $153,000.00 $153,000.00 $132,026.55 $132,026.55 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 122. Cottslruct Small Shelter 4 EA $53,400.00 $213,600.00 $25,828.02 $103,312.08 $44,120.00 $176,480.00 123. Cmtsuuct Bus Shelter I EA $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $19,667.86 $19,667.86 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 124. Supetclcloops I EA $930.00 $930.00 $1,297.25 ~ $1,297.25 $1,835.00 $1,835.00 125: $loncBoilard 12 EA $530.00 $6,360.00 $482.44. $5,789.28 $645.00 $7,740.00 126. Wheel Slap 246 EA $16.70 $4,108.20 $18.03 $4,435.38 $16.00 $3,936.00 127, SImm WaterPollution Pro~nction I LS $22.400.00 $22,400.00 $2,907.38 $2,907.38 $9,815.00 $9,815.00 128. Additional Liability and 2 Flagrues I LS $27,500.00 $27,500.00 $58,729.12 $58,729.12 $79,275.00 $79,275.00 129. Storm Drain Energy Dispatrher I LS $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $3,256.27 $3,256.27 $ 1.00 $1.00 130. Communication Bldg. PCC Pad I LS $1,090.00 $1,090.00 $3.256.27 $3,256.27 $3,120.00 $3,120.00 131. RedwoodHe~d~r 28 LF $5.40 $151.20 $11.63 $325.64 $5.40 $151.20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 2e Hillcrest Contracting. Inc. Kruz~ & Kruze Construction Vance Corporation Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total : Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid Prices Bid 132. Adjust GTE Manhok: I EA $1,080.00 $1,080.00 $581.48 $581.48 $1.00 $1.00 133, Headwall Wing Type I EA $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $2,907.38 $2,907.38 $4,055.00 $4,055.00 134. Headwall Trash Rack I EA $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $3,198.12 $3,198.12 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 135. 1/4 Ton Rip Rap 169 SF $4.30 $726.70 $8.14 $1,375.66 $5.55 $937.95 136. Field Office I LS $7,700.00 $7,700.00 $24,999.13 $24,999.13 $10,940.00 $10,940.00 137. i I/2" SCE St Light Conduit 3030 LF $4.85 $14,695.50 $5.81 $17,604.30 $4.50 $13,635.00 138. SCE St. Light Pullbox 12 EA $142.00 $1,704.00 $116.30 $1,395.60 $132.00 $1,584.00 139. 2--2" f3TE Conduit 500 LF $6.30 $3,150.00 $6.98 $3,490.00 $5.85 $2,925.00 140. G'lliPullbox 2 EA $630.00 $1,260.00 $1,395.54 $2,791.08 $585.00 $1,170.00 141. 4" PVC Sltuclurc Drain Line 400 LF $4.80 $1,920.00 $19.70 $7,880.00 $10.00 $4,000.00 142. lastall Aplenia 12" O.C./Millikcn I LS $1,050.00 $1,050.00 $1,744.43 $1,744.43 $1,040.00 $1,040.00 143. Mod. Irrigation on Milliken I LS $2,600.00 $2,600.00 $2,325.91 $2,325.91 $2,600.00 $2,600.00 BID TOTAL $3,053,402.05 $3,052282.53 $3,073,282.13 BID SUBMITTED $3,052,683.95 $3,065,513.29 RANCHO CUCAMONGA tOLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 3a Silvia Construction, Inc. FTR International, inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid 1. Clenring and Gabbing I L.S $63,000.00 $63,000.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 2. Remove A.C. Pavement 27,161 SF $0.11 $2,960.55 $0.25 $6,790.25 3. Remove P.C.C.C. & G. 463 LF $6.20 $2,870.60 $2.00 $926.00 4, Remove P.C.C. Curb 178 LF $6.97 $1,240.66 $2.00 $356.00 5. Remove P.C.C.D.A. 850 SF $1.73 $1,470.50 $2.00 $1,700.00 6. Remove P.C,C,. Sidewalk 1,885 SF $0.92 $1,734.20 $2.00 $3,770.00 7. Unclassifw, d Excavation 21,000 CY $2.60 $54,600.00 $3.00 $63,000.00 8. Remove Existing Fence !00 LF $10.60 $1,060.00 $5.00 $500.00 9. Remove Exist. Landscape & lit. I LS $3,080.00 $3,080.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 10. Relocate Exiting Trees 12 EA $223.00 $2,676.00 $2,000.00 $24,000.00 II. Crashed Aggr. or Slag Base 2,410 CY $16.70 $40,247.00 $15.00 $36,150.00 12, Sand 105 CY $103.00 $10,815.00 $25.00 $2,625.00 13. A.C. Pavement 4,100 TON $23.40 $95,940.00 $25.00 $102,500.00 14. Adj WV Box & Covet ~o Grade 2 EA $85.00 $170.00 $ 1,000.00 $2,000.00 15., Asphalt Seal Coat 110,000 SF $0.07 $7,590.00 $0.10 $ I 1,0~30.00 16, Adj. Water Meter Io Grade ! EA $320.00 $320.00 $ i ,000.00 $ 1,000.00 17. Adj. Fire Det. Ch. Val. m Grade ! EA $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 18, Adj. 2" R.P. Bk~ow Dev. to Gr. I EA $690.00 $690.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 19. Relocate Post lndicalor Valve ! EA $850.00 $850.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 ~ . . ' 4 EA ®""~ ,~,.~,, 21. PCC Pavement W/wire Mesh 17,820 SF $5.40 $96,228.00 $5.00 $89,100.00 22. Adj. Sewer Cleanout to Grade ! EA $425.00 $425.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 23. Calch Basin No. w=7' I EA $2,970.00 $2,970.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 24. Calch Basin No. w=14' 4 EA $3,500.00 $14,000.00 S3,000.00 $12,000.00 25. Calch Basin No. w=21' I EA $5,400.00 $5,400.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 26. PCC Collar 2 EA $320.00 $640.00 $500.00 $ 1,0(30.00 27. PCC Retaining Walls 195 LF $79.50 $15,502.50 $100.00 $19,500.00 28, Manhole No. 1 2 EA $69.00 $138.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 29. Manhole No. 4 I EA $2,340.00 $2,340.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 30. Sewer Mnnhole, CBMWD 2 EA $1,910.00 $3,820.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 31. Sewer Ivlnnhole, CCWD 4 EA $2,120.00 $8,480.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 32. Concrete Structures, Platform 690 CY $400.00 $276,000.00 $400.00 $276,000.00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 3b Silvia Construction, Inc. FrR International, Inc. Item ~ Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total No. : Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid 33. Junction Sm~cmte No. 4 I EA $540.00 $540.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 34. Track Protection Wall 271 LF $55.50 $15,040.50 $50.00 $13,550.00 35, Masonan/Block Wall 400 SF $16.80 $6,720.00 $16.00 $6,400.00 36. Crab Outlets ! EA S3,080.00 $3,080.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 37. Rolled Curb 10 LF $41,00 $410.00 $30.00 $300.00 38. 8" FCC Curb & 24" Outlet 4,540 LF S7.05 $32,007.00 $ ! 3.00 S59,020.00 39. 6" PC'C Dr. Approach 696 SF $2.82 $1,962.72 $5.00 $3,480.00 40. 8' PCC Dr. Approach 296 SF $3.30 $976.80 55.00 $1,480.00 41. 4" P.C.C. Sidewalk 7,200 SF $1.84 $13,248.00 52.50 $i8,000.00 42. PCC Wheelchair Ramp 1,250 SF $4.30 $5,375.00 $4.00 $5,000.00 4.3. P.C.C. Cross Gutter & Spnndrel 245 SF $7.00 Sl,715.00 $5.00 $1,225.00 44. 2" FCC Curb only 195 LF $19.70 S3,841.50 S10.00 SI,950.00 45. 6" PCC Curb & 2.4" Ouuer 679 LF $10.70 S7,265.30 Sl5.00 S!0,185.00 46. 6" PCC Curb 3,346 LF $6.40 $21,414.40 $10.00 $33,460.00 47. PCC HaMscape 35,955 SF $4.70 $168,988.50 $6.00 $215,750.00 48. , Colored Conc Stoic Plaffonn 6" 15.415 SF $7.05 $10~,675.75 $6.80 $104,822.00 49. Colored Conc Smsc Platform 12" 1,020 $F $11.00 $1 i,220.00 $10.00 $10,200.00 50. 6" PCC H~dec 692 LF $9.70 $6,712.40 $10.00 $6,920.00 51. PCC Stairs 574 SF $31.30 $17,966.20 $10.00 $5,740.00 52. Electric Service Pad 21 SF $53.00 $1,113.00 $10.00 $210.00 53. 4' Curb Only 1,165 LF $13.40 $15,611.00 $10.00 $11,650.00 $4, 5' X 20' Chain Link Gale Gate 2 EA $1,040.00 $2,0~0.00 · $500.00 $1,000.00 55. 5' Chain Link Fence 40 LF $19.10 $764.00 $10.00 $400.00 $6. 6' x 16' Chain Link Gate 2 EA $1,040.00 $2,080.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 57. 6' Chain Link Fence 1,981 LF $8.50 $16,838.50 $10.00 $19,810.00 58. Metal Handrail 516 LF $34.00 $17,544.00 $40.00 $20,640.00 59. Guardrail 400 LF $99.00 $39,600.00 $90.00 $36,000.00 60. Track Separation Fence 393 LF $39.30 $15,~.~.a..90 $50.00 $19,650.00 61, ' 18'" Dia. RCP 293 LF $36.00 $10,548.00 $37.00 $10,84 1.130 62. Rockangular PCC Channel 80 LF $25.20 $2,016.00 $60.00 $4,800.00 6,3. 24' Dia. RCP 345 LF $45.30 $15,628.50 $40.00 $13,800.00 64. 50' DiamelerRCP 340 LF $54.00 $18,360.130 $45.00 $15,300.00 RANCHO CUCAM ONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 3c Silvia Construction, Inc. FTR International, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid 65. 48" Diameter CMP 48 LF $102.00 $4,896.00 $62.00 $2,976.00 66. PVC Water Piping 972 LF $1 ! .70 $ I 1,372A0 $11.00 $10,692.00 67. 3/4', 1' & I I/2" St Wales Pipe 765 LF $13.80 $10,557.00 $15.00 $11,475.00 68. 8" CML & W Waterline 480 LF $23.40 $11.232.00 $50.00 $24,000.00 69. 10" CML & W Waterline 1.484 LF $26.00 $38,584.00 $45.00 $66,780.00 70. 16" CML & W Watedioe 304 LF $38.20 $11,612.80 $40.00 $12,160.00 71. FIre Hydrant Assembly w/GV 10 EA $2,440.00 $24.400.00 $3,000.00 $30,000.00 72. 8' Gate Valve 2 EA $740.00 . $1.480.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 73. 10' Gate Valve 2 EA $1,380.00 $2,760.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 74. 16"Gate Valve 2 EA $2,550.00 $5,100.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 75. Quick Coupling Valve 9 EA $127.00 $1,143.00 $200.00 $1,800.00 76. 2' Blow Off Assembly 2 EA $425.00 $850.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 77. i I/'2" Backflow Preventer 2 EA $740.00 $1,480.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 78. Fire Detector Check Valve I EA $6,900.00 $6,900.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 79. Rcmove4' Blow-Off Assembly I EA $212.00 $212.00 $600.00 $600.00 80. , Jack &Bole 8" Casing 209 LF $74.00 $15,466.00 $80.00 $16,720.00 81. 8' VCP Sewer 868 LF $27.60 $23,956.80 $30.00 $26,040.00 82. 6' VCP Sewer 84 LF $25.50 $2,142.00 $30.00 $2,520.00 83. Drinking Fountain Drain 2 EA $320.00 $640.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $4. Temporary CMP Basin I EA $1,660.00 $ 1,660.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 85. 2' Corne~ial Meter Service 2 EA $640.00 $1,280.00 $700.00 $1,400.00 86. 4" Blow Off I EA $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 87. Rectangular Drain Line 126 LF $50.00 $6,300.00 $20.00 $2,520.00 88, EI~_~'~ Sewca' I .att~rai 70 LF $24.40 $1,708.00 $25.00 $1,750.00 89. T.S. & S.L. @ Milliken & 6th I LS $114,000.00 $114,000.00 $130,000.00 $130,000.00 90, T.S. & S.L. @ Milliken & 7th i LS $98,000.00 $98,000.00 $105,000.00 $105,000.00 91. T.S.&S.L.@Milliken&Jersey i LS $112,000.00 $112,000.00 $120,000.00 $120,000.00 92. ln~igatiou I LS $75,000.00 S75,000.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 93. Phoenix Canaricnsis 20" Br. Trunl 8 EA $4,900.00 $39,200.00 $5,000.00 $40,000.00 94. Groundcover I Gal Container 3.496 EA $5.00 $17,480.00 $4.00 $13,984.00 95. Groundcover from fiats 7,062 SF $0.32 $2,259.84 $1.00 $7,062.00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION PHASE I PAGE 3d Silvia Construction, Inc. FTR International, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prices Bid Prices Bid 96, Mulch 27,038 SF $0.30 $8,057.32 $0.10 $2,703.80 97, 5 Gallon Trees 63 EA $29.70 $1,871.10 $20,00 $1,260.00 98. 15 Gallon Trees 50 EA $98.00 $4,900.00 $50.00 $2,500.00 99. 24" Box Trees 77 EA $223.00 $17,171.00 $100.(30 $7,700.00 100. 5 Gallon Shrubs i,192 EA $15.10 $17,999.20 $10.00 $1 !,920.00 101. 60-Day Maintenance Period I LS $1.600.00 $1,600.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 102. Soil Prep/Fine GindinE 35,538 SF $0.22 $7,924.97 $0.20 $7,107.60 103. Traffic $Uiping Public Street I LS $5,300.00 $5,300.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 IN. Traffic Signs, Public SIn~4 i LS $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 105, Traffic Striping Parking Lot ! LS $2,120.00 $2,120.00 $5,000.00 S5,000.00 106, Ttnf~c Signs, Pubtic Street I L$ $1,270.00 $1,270.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 107. Platform Surface Striping & Mark 1,050 LF $0.53 $556.50 $1,000.00 $1,050,000.00 108. Pedestrian Grade Crossing 2 EA $6,000.00 Sl2,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 109. Tac~leWamingTile 2130 SF $19.50 $41,535.00 $25,00 $53,250.00 110. Platfarm Lighting System i L$ $93,000.00 $93,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 11 !, Parkin8 Lot Lighting System I LS $58,600.00 $58,600.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 112., Electrical Service ! LS $17,200.00 $17,200,00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 113, Pintform & pInT~ Lightin8 I ' LS $241,000.00 $241,000.00 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 114. Canopy Wiring I LS $16,700.00 $16,700.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 115. Connection to Commua. Bldg. I LS $1,720.00 . $1,750.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 116, 6' Atrium Grates 5 EA $530.00 $2,650.00 $200.00 $1,000.00 I!7. Dtinkin8 Fountain 2 EA $1,920.00 $3,840.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 118. Aeration well 40 EA 590.00 S3,600.00 $200.00 $8,000.00 119. Provide & Inslall Benches 18 EA $1,600.00 $28,800.00 $1,000.00 $18,000.00 120. Provide &lnsmll Trash Recept. 12 EA $810.00 $9,720.00 $800.00 $9,600.00 121, Consreact Main Shelter i L$ $195,000.00 $195,000.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 1~2. Consuoct Small Shelter 4 EA $73,400.00 $293,600,00 $25,000.00 $100,000.00 123. Constant Bus Shelter I EA $21,200.00 $21,200.00 $10,000.00 Sl0,000.00 124, Supeiclcloeps I EA $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $5,000.00 S5,000.00 125, Stone Bollard 12 EA $706.00 $8,472.00 $500.00 $6,000.00 126. Wheel Stop 246 EA $10.60 $2,607.60 $25.00 $6,150.00 127. Storm Wmer Pollution Protection I LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Sl0,000.00 128. Additional Liability and 2 Flagme} I LS $59,000.00 $59,0(30.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 129. Storm Drain Energy Dispatcher I LS $3,640.00 $3,640.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 130. Communication Bldg. PCC Pad I LS $3,180.00 $3,180.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 131. Redwood Header 28 LF $22.50 ' $630.00 $10.00 $280.00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEmOLINK STATION PHASE i PAGE 3e Silvia Construction, Inc. FFR International, Inc. Item Item Estimated Unit of Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Quantity Measure Prick Bid Prices Bid 132. Adjust GTE Manhole I EA $644.00 $644.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 133. Headwall Wing Type I EA $2,970.00 $2,970.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 134. Headwall Trash Rack I EA $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 135. 1/4 Ton Rip Rap 169 SF $21.20 $3,582.80 $20.00 $3,380.00 136. Field Office I LS $51,300.00 $51,300.00 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 137. I I/2' SCE SL Light Conduit 3030 LF $4.80 $14,544.00 $5.00 $15,150.00 138. SCE St. Light Pullbox 12 EA $140.00 $1,680.00 $200.00 $2,400.00 139. 2--2" GTE Conduit 500 LF $6.20 $3,100.00 $10.00 $5,000.00 140. GTE haHhox 2 EA $620.00 $ 1,240.00 $700.00 $ 1,400.00 141. 4" PVC Sireclare Drain Line 400 LF $19.60 $7,840.00 $10.00 $4,000.00 142. Install Apmmia 12' O.CfMilliken I LS $800.00 $800.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 143. Meal. irrigation on Milliken I LS $2,820.00 $2,820.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 BID TOTAL $0.00 $3,244352.32 $4,537,460.65 BID SUBMfI'fIF..D $3,243392.32 $3,768,580.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek,'Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAIL MODIFICATIONS, LOCATED WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE, TO KDK ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTORS FOR THE AMOUNT OF $158,691.40 ($144,174.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 41-4130-9321 RECO~iENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize execution of cont,act for Etiwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements and Trail Modifications, to the 1 owest responsive bidder, KDK Engineering Constructors for the amount of $144,174.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $158,591.40 ($144,174.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 41-4130- g321. BACKGROUND/AN/U,YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on April 12, 1994, for the sub.!ect project. KDK Engineering Constructors is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $144,174.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $203.000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, William J. Oeil~~ ' City Engineer -WjO:LRB:dlw Attachment ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVMENTS AND TRAIL MODIFICATIONS LOCATION MAP ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAIL MODIFICATIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS Bid Date: April 12, 1994 Engineer's Estimate: $203,000.00 KDK Eng--Constructors ivanko Incorporated Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Original Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Authorized Pricm Bid Prices Bid 1. R~move P.C.C. Curb & Gut~r LF 151 $5.00 $755.00 $3.00 $453.00 $9.00 $1,359.00 2. Remove Planter Mow Cud) LF 210 $4,00 $840.00 $3.00 $630.00 $8.00 $1,680.00 3. Sawcut & Remove Mow Curb LF 40 $4.00 $160.00 $3.00 $120.130 $8.00 $320.00 4. Remove Mow Curb "Vine Pocket' EA 34 $500.00 $17,000.00 $15.00 $510.00 $45.00 $1,530.00 5. Remove Fence Posts · EA 123 $20.00 $2,460.00 $5.00 $615.00 $17.00 $2,091.00 6. R & R Fence Rails & Brackets LF 2,865 $2.00 $5,730.00 $ 1.00 $2,865.00 $ 1.00 $2,865.00 7. Remove Exist. Step Thru Post EA I $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 8. Remove Exist. Pilaster EA I $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 $400.00 9. Inshall Decomposed Granite CY 90 $20.00 $1,800.00 $20.00 $1,800.00 $67.00 $6,030.00 10. Install Decomposed Granite LS I $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $300.00 $300.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 11. Install Brooks Prod. #1218 C.B. $0.00 $0.00 and Gate EA 16 $850.00 $13,600.00 $800.00 $12,800.00 $900.00 $14,400.00 12., JuclionSttuctureNo. 4 EA II $2,500.00 $27,500.00 $300.00 $3,300.00 $400.00 $4,400.00 13. Construct Manhole EA 9 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 $2,700.00 $24,300.00 $1,900.00 $17,100.00 14. Consuuct CMP Riser Inlet EA 3 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,900.00 $5,700.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 15. Constngt 8' Curb & 18" Gutlet LF 129 $12.00 $1,548.00 $11.00 $1,419.00 $17.00 $2,193.00 16. Const. Drive Approach SF 107 $4.00 $428.00 $6.00 $642.00 $10.00 $1,070.00 17. ConsttuctPCC "V" Gutter LF 1,870 $14.00 $26,180.00 $8.00 $14,960.00 $9.00 $16,830.00 lg. Instsll 18" Diameter PVC St. Dr. LF 1,638 $30.00 $49,140.00 $30.00 $49,140.00 $41.00 $67,158.00 19. Install 8' Diameter PVC St. Dr. LF 309 $18.00 $5,562.00 $20.00 $6,180.00 $35.00 $10,815.00 20. Install 24' Diameter PVC St. Dr. LF 178 $50.00 $8,900.00 $32.00 $5,696.00 $46.00 $8,188.00 21. P.C.C. Curb LF 955 $15.00 $14,325.00 $7.00 $6,685.00 $2.00 $1,910.00 22. Modify Irrigation System LS I $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 23. !nstsll PVC Fence Post EA 123 $25.00 $3,075.00 $33.00 $4,059.00 $40.00 $4,920.00 $201,603.00 $144, 174.00 $174,759.00 ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAIL MODIFICATIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS Bid Date: April 12, 1994 Engineer's Estimate: $203,000.00 Pipeline Specialties, inc. EGN Construction, Inc. Bopark Enterprises, Inc. Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Bid Prkes Bid Prices Bid 1. ReinoveP.C.C. Curb&(3uuex LF 151 $10.00 $1,510.00 $10.00 $1,510.00 $1.50 $226.50 2. Remove Planlet Mow Curb LF 210 $10.00 $2,100.00 $4.00 $840.00 $1.50 $315.00 3; Sawcut & Remove Mow Curb LF 40 $10.00 $400.00 $9.00 $360.00 S130 $60.00 4. Remove Mow Cud> "Vine Pocket' EA 34 $25.00 $850.00 $30.00 $ 1,020.00 $50.00 $ 1,700.00 5. Remove Fence Posts EA 123 $10.00 $1,230.00 $12.00 $1,476.00 $25.00 $3,075.00 6. R & R Fence Rails & Brackets LF 2,865 $3.00 $8,595.00 $0.70 $2,005.50 $4.00 $11,460.00 7. Remove Exist. Step Thru Post EA I $5.00 $5.00 $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 & Remove Exist. Pilaster EA I $50.00 $50.00 $250.00 $250.00 $100,00 $100.00 9. Install Decomposed Granite CY 90 $50.00 $4,500.00 $75.00 $6,750.00 $35.00 $3,150.00 10. Install Decomposed Granite LS I $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 11. !nstnlIBmoksPtod.#1218C. B. $0.00 and Gate EA 16 $250.00 $4,000.00 $600.00 $9,600.00 $600.00 $9,600.00 12. Juction Suuctut= No. 4 EA 11 $250.00 $2350.00 S300.00 $3,300.00 $1,000.00 $11,000.00 13. , CottsuuctManhole EA 9 $1,900.00 $17,100.00 $2,550.00 $22,950.00 $1,200.00 $10,800.00 14. Construct CMP Riser Inlet EA 3 $850.00 $2,550.00 $1,350.00 $4,050.00 $750.00 $2,250.00 15. Construct 8" Curb & 18' Grater LF 129 $15.50 $1,999.50 $14.99 $1,933.71 $15.00 $1,935.00 16, Const. DtiveApproach SF 107 $11.00 $1,177.00 $5.63 $602.41 $3.50 $374.50 17, Construct PCC "V* Gutter LF 1,870 $7.20 $13,464.00 $8.84 $16,530.80 $8.00 $14,960.00 l& Install 18' Dinmew PVC St. Dr. LF 1,638 $49.00 $80,262.00 $48.97 $80,212.86 $50.00 $81,900.00 19. Install 8' Diameter PVC 8t. Dr. LF 309 $30.00 $9,270.00 $29.99 $9,266.91 $25.00 $7,725.00 20, Install 24" Diameles PVC SL Dr. LF 178 $48.00 $8,544.00 $49.97 $8,894.66 $65.00 $ I 1,570.00 21. P.C.C. Curb LF 955 $8.00 $7,640.00 $8.45 $8,069.75 $6.00 $5,730.00 22. Modify IrrigatiOn System LS I $9,507.00 $9,507.00 $4.500.00 $4,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 23, Install PVC Fence Post EA 123 $50.00 $6,150.00 $39.00 $4,797.00 $40.00 $4,920.00 $186,153.50 $189,769.60 $190,551.00 ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS AND TRAIL MODIFICATIONS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS Bid Date: April 12, 1994 Engineer's Estimate: $203,000.00 SJ Burkhardt, Inc. Slater, Incorporated Sunrise Landscape Co. Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Bid Prices Bid Prices Bid 1, RemoveP.C.C. Cutb&Guttet LF 151 $8.00 $1,208.00 $4.10 $619.10 $7.30 $1,102.30 2. Remove Planle~ Mow Curb LF 210 $5.50 $1,155.00 $3.08 $646.80 $0.52 $109.20 3. Sawcut&RemoveMowCmb LF 40 $5.50 $220.00 $25.00 $1,000.00 $4.13 $165.20 4. Remove Mow Curb 'Vin~ Pockef EA 34 $40.00 $1,360.00 $21.00 $714.00 $25.92 $881.28 5. RemoveFetw, ePosu EA 123 $32.00 $3,936.00 $12.30 $1,512.90 $1.79 $220.17 6. R & R Fence Rails &Brackcts LF 2865 $2.20 $6,303.00 $1.54 $4,412.10 $4.61 $13,207.65 7. Remove ExisL Step Thin Post EA I $100.00 $100.00 $103.00 $103.00 $550.80 $550.80 8. Remove Exist. Pilaster EA 1 $250.00 $250.00 $308.00 $308.00 $550.80 $550.80 9. Inslali Decomposed Granite CY 90 $53.00 $4,770.00 $87.00 $7,830.00 $91.80 $8,262.00 10, Install Decomposed Granite L$ I $2,550.00 $2,550.00 $2,460.00 $2,460.00 $220.32 $220.32 11, lnslalIBrooksPmd.#1218C.B. $0.00 and Crate EA 16 $1,020.00 $16,320.00 $462.00 $7,392.00 $550.80 $8,812.80 12. , Juctioa Structure No. 4 EA 11 $275.00 $3,025.00 $205.00 $2,255.00 $660.96 $7,270.56 13. Construct Manhole EA 9 $2,340.00 $21,060.00 $3,050.00 $27,450.00 $2,325.60 $20,930A0 14. Construct CMP Riser Inlet EA 3 $ I, 100.00 $3,300.00 $1,025.00 $3,075.00 $1,652.40 $4,957.20 IS. Construct 8" Curb & 18" Gutter LF 129 $12.90 $1,664.10 $16.00 $2,064.00 $17.04 $2,198.16 16. ConsL Drive Approach SF 107 $3.30 $353.10 $8.20 $877.40 $14.41 $1,541.87 17. ConstructPCC 'V' Gutter LF 1870 $7.50 $14,025.00 $12.00 $22,440.00 $9.91 $18,531.70 18. Insladl 18' DimneWt PVC SL Dr. LF 1638 $43.50 $71,253.00 $42.00 $68,796.00 $76.59 $125,454.42 19. Install 8" DiameWt PVC St. Dr. LF 309 $31.00 $9,579.00 $29.73 $9,186.57 $55.90 $17,273.10 20. lnslall :24' DiameWt PVC St. Dt LF 178 $43.50 $7,743.00 $45.00 $8,010.00 $68.84 $12,253.52 21. p.C.C. Curb LF 955 $9.40 $8,977.00 $11.50 $10,982.50 $5.51 $5,262.05 22. Modify Iffigafion System LS I $7,245.80 $7,245.$0 $3,565.00 $3,565.00 $9,670.95 $9,670.95 2,3. Install PVC Fence Post EA 123 $50.00 $6,150.00 $56.00 $6,888.00 $42.99 $5,287.77 $192,547.00 $192,587.37 $264,714.22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager .,~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY Linda R. Beak, Junior Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR RESURFACING OF TRAFFIC DECK/PARKING STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TO LADHER COATINGS, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $186,301.50 ($169,365.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RDA ACCOUNT NO. 17-15000 RECONNE:NDATION It is recon~nended that the City Council accept all bids for the Resurfacing of Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project, except the bid submitted by Consolidated Waterproofing, Incorporated. It is recommended that the bid submitted by Consolidated Waterproofing, Incorporated, be rejected as nonresponsive. It is recon~nended that the City Council award and authorize for execution, the contract for Resurfacing of Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project, to the lowest responsive bidder, Ladnet Coatings for the amount of $169,365.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $186,301.50 ($169,365.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from RDA Account No. 17-15000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 22, 1994, for the subject project. Ladner Coatings is the apparent lowest responsive bidder, with a bid amount of $169.365.00 (see attached bid summary). The Englneer's estimate was $160,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all, with the exception of Consolidated Waterproofing, to be compl eta and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all remaining bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully sub~/~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:dlw Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RESURFACING OF TRAFIC BEARING DECK/PARKING STRUCTURE DATE: MARCII 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $160,000.00 Puge 1 of 3 , Angelus Waterproofing Consolidated Waterproofing, Inc. Ladner Coalings & Restoration Incorporated Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Amount Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Price Price Price 1. Wearing surface coat (including coves) including all under coats. surface preparation and removals, exceptjointandcracksealing SF 50,000 $2.43 $121,500.00 $2.79 $139,500.00 $3.13 $156,500.00 2. Doubl~-Texturing top coat only SF 10,000 $0.31 $3,100.00 $0.45 $4,500.00 $0.51 $5,100.00 3. Clean, prime and treat visible' hairline cracks 1/16" or less LF 2,000 $0.61 $1,220.00 $1.42 $2,840.00 $0.90 $1,800.00 4. Route, caulk and treat cracks and joints over 1/16" LF 2,000 $0.83 $1,660.00 $1.45 $2,900.00 $1.97 $3,940.00 5. Remove existing caulk, clean andreiealcontroljoints · LF 10,000 $0.77 $7,700.00 $1.75 $17,500.00 $1.67 $16,700.00 6. Remove, store and reinshall concrete wheel stops, including prepration and epoxy adhesive. EA 110 $21.03 $2,313.30 $10.25 $1,127.50 $8.00 $880.00 7. Slainveil tread wearing surface coat, including all under coats SF 350 $3.76 $1,316.00 $2.85 $997.50 $3.88 $1,358.00 Proposal Totals $138,809.30 $169,365.00 '$186,278.00 Total Submitted $138,809.00 $186,037.76 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RESURFACING OF TRAFIC BEARING DECK/PARKING STRUCTURE DATE: MARCH 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $160,000.00 Page 2 of 3 D. V. Troyer, Company. Kitson Specialty Cent. Hnnsteg Systems, Inc. Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Amount Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Price Price Price L wearing surface coat (including coves) including all under coats, surface preparation and removals, except joint and crack sealing SF 50,000 . $3.53 $176,500.00 $2.80 $140,000.00 $3.03 $151,500.00 2. Double-Textm'ing tap coat only SF 10,000 $0.52 $5,200.00 $0.71 $7,100.00 $0.69 $6,900.00 3. Clean, prime and treat visible' hairline cracks 1/16" or less LF 2,000 $0.00 $0.00 $0.85 $1,700.00 $1.48 $2,960.00 4. Route, caulk and treat cracks and joints over 1/16" LF 2,000 $0.00 $0.00 $3.00 $6,000.00 $2.36 $4,720.00 5. Remove existing caulk, clean and reseal control joints : · ' LF 10,000 $0A2 ' $4,200.00 $3.36 $33,600.00 $2.85 $28,500.00 6, Retrieve. stare and reinstall concrete wheel stops, including prepration and epoxy adhesive. EA 110 $22.00 $2,420.00 $29.09 $3,199.90 $27.27 $2,999.70 7. Stairwell tread wearing surface · coal, including all under coats SF 350 $4.19 $1,466.50 $3.40 $1.190.00 $5.41 $1,893.50 Proposal Totals $189,786.50 $192,789.90 $199,473.20 Total Submitted $189,965.00 $192,967.00 $199,487.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS RESURFAC~NG OF TRAFIC BEARING DECK/PAR KING STRUCTURE DATE: MARCH 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $160,000.00 Page 3 of 3 Applied Waterproofing Tech Western Waterproofing Murphy Industrial Coatings Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Amount Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Price Price Price I. Wearing surface coat (including coves) including all under surface preparation and removals, exceptjointandcracksealing SF 50,000 $3.653 $182.650.00 $3.85 $192,500.00 $2.75 $137,500.00 2. Double-Texturing top coat only SF 10,000 $0.50 $5,000.00 $0.50 $5,000.00 $1.80 $18,000.00 3.. Clean, prime and treat visible hairline cracks 1/16" or less LF 2.000 $1.00 $2,000.00 $1.00 $2,000.00 $2.75 $5,500.00 4. Route, caulk and treat cracks and joints over 1/16" LF 2,000 $1.50 $3.000.00 $3.10 $6,200.00 $3.75 $7,500.00 5. Remove existing caulk, clean andresealcontroljoints - ' LF 10,000 $2.00 $20,000.00 $1.60 $16,000.00 $6.00 $60,000.00 6. Remove, store and reinstall concrete wheel stops, including prepration and epoxy adhesive. EA 110 $15.00 $I,650.00 $16.00 $1.760.00 $50.00 $5,500.00 7. Slainyell tread wearing surface coat, including all under coats SF 350 $2.00 $700.00 $4.00 $1,400.00 $4.00 $1,400.00 Proposal Totals $215,000.00 $224,860.00 $235,400.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~.~ FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: LiMa R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD AND' AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR 1993/94 FY STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES HOT ASPHALT RUBBER OVERLAY, CAPE SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL, TO IPS SERVICES, INCORPORATED, FOR THE AMOUNT Of $648,162.48 ($589,238.62 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FUND, ACCOUNT NOS. 22-4637-9313, 22-4637-9311 AND GAS TAX, ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9113 R!~CO!~ENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize execution of contract for 1993/94 FY Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations to the lowest responsive bidder, IPS Services, Incorporated, for the amount of $589,238.62 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $648,162.48 ($589,238.62 plus 10% contingency), to be-funded from Transportation Development Fund, Account Nos. 22-4637-9313, 22-4637-9311 and Gas Tax, Account No. 10-4637-9113. BACI(GROUND/ANALYSIS , Per previous Counctl action, bids were s~ iclted, received and opened on March 22, 1994, for the subject project. IPS Services, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $589,238.62 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $773,205.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be compl ere and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully sub~d~j_ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:dlw Attachment 133 DIST., DIST. 3 ~ UPLAND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 93/94 FISCAL ;,fEAR STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM 13~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA & s~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 93/94 FISCAL YEAR v,c,,,,n, ""- STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM 135 UPLAND oooooeooeoe CAPE SE~L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . 93/94 FISCAL'YEAR ~'~""~' "" STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM 136 · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS 1993/1994 FY STREET REHAB PROGRAM DATE: MARCII 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $773,205.00 IPS Services Manhole Adjusters Item Item Unit ot Estimated Unit Original Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Authorized Prices Prices Carnielian--Base Line Road to 19th Street 1. Mobilization LS I $0.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 14100 $14,100.00 2. Clearing and Gmbbing L.S I $0.00 $14,000.00 $t4,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 3. ColdPlane(l/2") SF 47916 $0.00 :$0.12 $5,749.92 0.099 $4,743.68 4. Cold Plane (11/2") SF 191664 $0.00 $0.09 $17,249.76 $0.09 $17,249.76 S. AC Leveling Course (1/2" Min.) TON 748 $0.00 $28.00 $20,944.00 $48.30 $36,128.40 6. AC Rubber Hot Mix-Gap Gr. TON 1871 $0.00 $55.00 $102,905.00 $49.10 $91,866.10 7. Adj. MH to Grade EA 16 $0.00 $295.00 $4,720.00 $190.00 $3,040.00 8. Adj. WV to Grade EA 26 $0.00 $150.00 $3,900.00 $30.00 $780.00 9. Traffic Control LS I $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,900.00 $9,900.00 10. R & R Striping &Markers LS I $0.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,900.00 $9,900.00 11. Replace Traffic Signal Loops EA 15 $0.00 $300.00 $4,500.00 $270.00 $4,050.00 Valle Vista--Alta Cuesta to Red Hill Country Club Drive $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 12. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate $0.00 $0.00 Membrane W/AC Leveling Corn. $0.00 $0.00 Type II Slum/Seal, Include Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crock Seal, Traffic Control, $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers SY 13098 $0.00 $1.24 $16,241.52 $4.83 $63,263.34 Victoria Park Lane--West end to Base Line Road $0.00 $0.00 13. Type II Slurry Seal, Surface Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crock Seal, Traffic Control $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers .... SY 28622 $0.00 $0.94 $26,904.68 $0.69 $19,749.18 Banyan--Carnelian Street to we~it of Hellman Avenue $0.00 $0.00 14. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Mere. $0.00 $0.00 Type It Slurry Seal, Su~acePrep., $0.00 $0.00 Crock Seal, Traffic Control $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers SY 16124 $0.00 $2.94 $47,404.56 $3.13 $50,468.12 Various Streets $0.00 $0.00 15. Type II Slurty Seal, Stuface Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crock Seal, Traffic Control $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers SY 457573 $0.00 $0.52 $237,937.96 $0.41 $187,604.93 Ag;lte Street--Roberds Street to La Vine Street $0.00 $0.00 16. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate $0.00 $0.00 Membrane W/AC Leveling Cotft. $0.00 $0.00 Type II Slum] Seal, Include Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crack Seal, Traffic Control, $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers SY 4620 $0.00 $2.94 $13,582.80 $3.40 $15,708.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS 1993/1994 FY STREET REHAB PROGRAM PAGE 2 DATE: MARCH 2:3, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $773,205.00 IPS Services Manhole Adjusters Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Original Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Authorized Prices Prices Garnet Street--Base Line Road to North End $0.00 $0.00 17. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate:. i. $0.00 $0.00 Membrane W/AC Levering C. our. $0.00 $0.00 Type I! Sluffy Seal, Include Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crack Seal, Traffic Coatrol, $0.00 $0.00 Suiping &Markers SY 6343 $0.00 $2.94 $18,648.42 $3.13 $19,853.59 Rancho Street $0.00 $0.00 18. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate $0.00 $0.00 Membrane W/AC Leveling Cour. $0.00 $0.00 Type I1 Slmry Seal. Include Prep. $0.00 $0.00 Crack Seal, Traffic Control. $0.00 $0.00 Striping &Markers SY 5000 $0.00 $2.94 $14,700.00 $3.20 . $16,000.00 Monte Vista--Archibald Avenue to Amethyst Avenue 19, Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane (Cape Seal), Including Type II Slun7 Seal, Asphalt Concrete Leveling Course, Crack Sealing, Surface P;reparafion, Traffic Con~ol, TraIfic Sniping, Pavement Markers ' ' ' ' SY 4950 $3.00 $14,850.00 5.63 $27,868.50 PROPOSAL TOTAL $589,238.62 $598,273.60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS PAGE 3 1993/1994 FY STREET REHAB PROGRAM DATE: MARCH 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $773,205.00 Boral Resources Asphalt Maintenance Silvla Construction Item Item Unit of Estimated Unit Original Quantity Amount Quantity Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Authorized Carnielian--Base Line Road to 19th Street 1. Mobilization LS 1 $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $5,812.00 $5,812.00 2. Clearing and Grabbing L.S I $8,200.00 $8,200.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 3. Cold Plane (1/2") SF 47916 $0.10 $4,791.60 $0.0935 $4,480.15 $0.0880 $4,216.61 4. Cold Plane (l 1/2") SF 191664 $0.09 $17,249.76 $0.1060 $20,316.38 $0.09 $16,866.43 5. AC Leveling Course (1/2" Min.) TON 748 $31.40 $23,487.20 $26.75 $20,009.00 $28.85 $21,579.80 6. AC Rubber Hot Mix-Gap Gr. TON 1871 $57.60 $107,769.60 $61.14 $114,392.94 $57.78 $108,106.38 7. Adj. MH to Grade EA 16 $206.00 $3,296.00 $325.00 $5,200.00 $180.00 $2,880.00 8. Adj. WVtoGrade EA 26 $108.00 $2,808.00 $125.00 $3,250.00 $62.00 $1,612.00 9. Traffic Control LS I $2,950.00 $2,950.00 $8,575.00 $8,575.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 10. R & R Striping & Markers LS I $9,800.00 $9,800.00 $9,815.00 $9,815.00 $9,005.25 $9,005.25 11. Replace Traffic Signal Loops EA 15 $228.00 $3,420.00 $295.00 $4,425.00 $210.00 $3,150.00 Valle Vista--Alia Cuesta to Red Hill Country Club Drive 12. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane W/AC Leveling Cour. Type It Slurry Seal, Include Prep. Crack Seal, Traffic Control, Swiping &Markers SY 13098 $4.70 $61,560.60 $3.58 $46,890.84 $4.21 $55,142.58 Vicloria Park Lane--West end to Base Line Road $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1:3. Type It Slurry Seal, Surface Prep. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Crack Seal, Traffic Contrql $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Swiping &Markers SY 28622 $0.79 $22,611.38 $0.8940 $25,588.07 $0.95 $27,047.79 Banyan--Carnelian Street to west of Hellman AVenue 14. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Meat.. Type II Slurry Seal, Surface Prep. Crack Seal, Traffic Control Swiping &Markers SY 16124 $3.40 $54,821.60 $3.16 $50,951.84 $2.70 $43,534.80 Various Streets 15. Type II Slurry Seal, Surface Prep. Crack Seat, Traffic Control Swiping&Markers SY 457573 $0.41 $187,604.93 $0.5950 $272,255.94 $0.51 $233,362.23 Agate Street--Roberds Street to La Vine Street 16. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane W/AC Leveling Cour. Type II Shrty Seal, Inclufle Prep. Crack Seal, Traffic Control, Swiping &Markers SY 4620 $3.80 $17,556.00 $3.48 $16,077.60 $3,61 $16,678.20 CITY OF RANCtlO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS PAGE 4 1993/1994 FISCAL YEAR STREET REHAB PROGRAM DATE: MARCH 22, 1994 ENGINEERS'S ESTIMATE: $773,205.00 Boral Resources Asphalt Maintenance Silvla Conslructlon Item Itera Unit of Estimated Unit Original Unit Amount Unit Amount No. Description Measure Quantity Prices Authorized Prices Prices Garnet SIreel--Base Line Road to North End 17. Asphalt Rubber Aggregat~ Membrane W/AC Leveling Cout. Type II Slutry Seal, Include Prep. Crack Seal, Traffic Conlxol, Striping &Markets SY 6343 $3.45 $21,883.35 $3.15 $19,980.45 $3.52 $22,327.36 Rancho Sireel 18. Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane W/AC Leveling Cour. Type It Slurry Seal, Include Prep. Crock Seal, Traffic Control, Striping &Markers SY 5000 $3.60 $18,000.00 $3.22 $16,100.00 $4.32 $21,600.00 Monte Vista-Archibald Avenue to Amethyst Avenue 19. Asphalt RubMr Aggregate Membrane (Cape Seal), Including Type Ii Slun'y Seal, Asphalt Concrete Leveling Course, Crack Sealing, Surface P;rspara~on, Traffic Control, Traffic S~ping, Pavement Markers SY 4950 $6.20 $30,690.00 4.4 $21,780.00 $5.45 $26,977.50 PROPOSED TOTALS: ' $599,880.02 $682,088.20 $628,398.93 SHOWN AS $682,097.99 $628,342.80 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 ~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager !-~ FROM: William J. O'Netl, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR HELLMAN AVENUE AT NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, TO UNDE~OOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE AMOUNT OF $41,696.60 ($37,906.00 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM PROP 111 FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 09-4637-9304 RECOI~qENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize execution of contract for Hellman Avenue at Ninth Street Improvement Project to the lowest responsive bidder, Underwood Construction Company for the amount of $41,696.60 ($37,906.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Prop 111 Fund, Account No. 09-4637-9304. BACICGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on March 15, 1994, for the subject project. Underwood Construction Company is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $37,g06.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $41,718.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully mit~~ William J. ~ City Engineer WjO:LRB:dlw Attachment 141 CIT~tANCHO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE AT NINTH STREET Page I of 2 Engineer's Estimate Underwood Constr. Co. Laird Construction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Total Unit Prices Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount 1. Clearing and Grubbing LS I $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $5,050.00 $5,050.00 2. Remove 15' Tree EA. I $250.00 $250.00 $400.00 $400.00 $270.00 $270.00 3. 4" Crushed Aggregate Base TON 6 $30.00 $180.00 $80.00 $480.00 $60.00 $360.00 4. 6" A.C. Pavement & Removals TON 20 $50.00 $1,000.00 $80.00 $1,600.00 $82.00 $1,640.00 5. Cold Plane 1.5" Deep SF !,780 $1.00 $1,780.00 $2.85 $5,073.00 $0.90 $1,602.00 6. Const. Catch Basin W= 16' EA. 1 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,375.00 $4,375.00 7. Conslruct Curb side Drain Outlet EA. I $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,350.00 $3,350.00 8. R & R 12" P.C.C. C & (3 LF 190 $15.00 $2,850.00 $12.00 $2,280.00 $15.50 $2,945.00 9. R & R 8" P.C.C. C & G LF 30 $18.00 $540.00 $30.00 $900.00 $13.60. $408.00 10. Const. 4' P.C.C Sidewalk SF 2,110 $2.50 $5,275.00 $2.95 $6,224.50 $1.90 $4,009.00 11. Const. P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp EA. 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $200.00 12. Const. P.C.C. Cross Gutter SF 675 $4.50 $3,037.50 $5.50 $3,712.50 $5.10 $3,442.50 13. 18" R.C.P. 1500D LF 187 $65.00 $12,155.00 $28.00 $5,236.00 $45.70 $8,545.90 14. Plant 9.4" Box tree EA. 1 $350.00 $350.00 $500.00 $500.00 $300.00 $300.00 15. Resod and Restore Irrigation LS I $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 16. Relocale Stop & St. Name Signs EA 2 $250.00 $500.00 $300.00 $600.00 $100.00 $200.00 17. Traffic Striping & Signing LS I $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $165.00 $165.00 TOTAL $41,717.50 $37,906.00 $38,112.40 Riverside Construction A.W. Davies, Inc. E.C. Construction Item Description Unit Quantity Price Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount 1. Clearing and Gnabbing LS I $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $3,283.00 $3,283.00 2. Remove 15' Tree .: . . EA. i $350.00 $350.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $500.00 $500.00 3. 4" Crushed Aggregate-Base TON 6 $175.00 $1,050.00 $200.00 $1,200.00 $75.00 $450.00 4. 6" A.C. Pavement & Removals TON 20 $150.00 $3,000.00 $100.00 $2,000.00 $163.90 $3,278.00 5. Cold Plane 1.5" Deep SF 1,780 $1.25 $2,225.00 $1.00 $1,780.00 $1.15 $2,047.00 6. Const. Catch Basin W=I6' EA. 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 7. Construct Curb side Drain Ou~et EA. I $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,010.00 $3,010.00 8. R & R 12" P.C.C. C & G LF 190 $10.00 $1,900.00 $18.00 $3,420.00 $18.00 $3,420.00 9. R & R 8" P.C.C. C & G LF 30 $15.00 $450.00 $25.00 $750.00 $20.50 $615.00 Shown as $600.00 10. Const. 4" P.C.C Sidewalk SF 2,110 $1.80 $3,798.00 $2.00 $4,220.00 $2.00 $4,220.00 11. Const. P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp EA. 2 $250.00 $500.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 12. Const. P.C.C. Cross Gutter SF 675 $5.00 $3,375.00 $5.00 $3,375.00 $3.00 $2,025.00 13. 18" R.C.P. 1500D LF 187 $50.00 $9,350.00 $30.00 $5,610.00 $60.00 $11,220.00 14. Plant 24" Box tree EA. I $200.00 $200.00 $600.00 $600.00 $385.00 $385.00 15. Resod and Restore Irrigation LS I $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $495.00 $495.00 16. Relocate Stop & St. Name Signs EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 $170.00 $340.00 $100.00 $200.00 17. Traffic Sniping & Signing LS I $500.00 $500.00 $800.00 $800.00 $250.00 $250.00 TOTAL $39,398.00 $39,995.00 $40,898.00 Shown as $40,883.00 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS 15-Mar-94 STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE AT NINTH STREET Page 2 of 2 J.E. G. Construction K D K Engineering E.G. N. Construction !tern Description Unit Quantity Price Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount 1. Clearing and Grubbing L$ I $3,900.00 $3,900.00 $500.00 $500.00 $6,400.00 $6,400.00 2. Remove 15' Tree EA. I $400.00 $400.00 $750.00 $750.00 $400.00 $400.00 3. 4" Crushed Aggregate Base TON 6 $60.00 $360.00 $30.00 $180.00 $50.00 $300.00 4. 6" A.C. Pavement & Removals TON 20 $160.00 $3,200.00 $125.00 $2,500.00 $170.00 $3300.00 5. Cold Plane 1.5" Deep SF 1,780 $1.50 $2,670.00 $1.00 $1,780.00 $1.50 $2,670.00 6. Coast. Catch Basin W=16' EA. I $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,680.00 $4,680.00 7. Construct Curb side Drain Outlet EA. I $2,100.00 $2,100.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 8. R & R 12' P.C.C, C & G LF 190 $21.00 $3,990.00 $3.00 $570.00 !$14.75 $2,802.50 9. R & R 8" P.C.C. C & O LF 30 $35.00 $1,050.00 $10.00 $300.00 ?.$23.75 $712.50 10. Coast. 4" P.C.C Sidewalk SF 2,110 $2.60 $5,486.00 $3.00 $6,330.00 $1.99 $4,198.90 11. Const. P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp EA. 2 $350.00 $700.00 $7.00 $14.00 !$500.00 $1,000.00 Shown as $1,400.00 12. Coast. P.C.C. Cross Gutrex SF 675 $7.50 $5,062.50 $5.00 $3,375.00 $4.59 $3,098.25 13. 18" R.C.P. 1500D LF 187 $42.00 $7,854.00 $85.00 $15,895.00 $49.50 $9,256.50 14. Plant 24" Box tree EA. I $600.00 $600.00 $750.00 $750.00 $500.00 $500.00 15. ResodandRastorelrrigafion LS 1 $600.00 $600.00 ! $1,200.110 $1,200.00 $2,760.00 $2,760.(I0 16. Relocate Stop & St. Name Signs EA 2 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 $400.00 $100.00 $200.00 17. Traffic Suiping & Signing LS I $575.00 $575.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $950.00 $950.00 TOTAL $43,147.50 $42,544.00 $45,628.65 Shown as $43,930.00 Los Angeles Engineering Bopark Enterprises Item DescriptiOn . Unit Quantity Price Bid Amount Unit Prices Bid Amount 1. Clearing and Grubbing LS I $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2. Remove 15' Tree EA. I $500.00 $500.00 $200.00 $200.00 3. 4" Croshed Aggregau~ Base TON 6 ~ $150.00 $900.00 $40.00 $240.00 4. 6" A.C. Pavement & Removals, TON 20 $185.00 $3,700.00 $150.00 $3,000.00 5. Cold Plane 1.5" Deep SF 1.780 $2.25 $4,005.00 $2.00 $3,560,130 6. Coast. Calt:h Basin W=16' EA. 1, $3,850.00 $3,850.00 $4,375.00 $4,375.00 7. Construct Curb side Drain Outlet EA. I $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,750.00 $3,750.00 8. R & R 12' P.C.C. C & G LF 190 $18.00 $3,420.00 $22.50 $4,275.00 9. R & R 8' P.C.C. C & G LF 30 $25.00 $750.00 $31.25 $937.50 10. Coast 4" P.C.C Sidewalk SF 2, 110 $2.00 $4,220.00 $2.20 $4,642.00 ! I. Coost. P.C.C. Wheel Chair Ramp EA. 2 $350.00 $700.00 $600.130 $1,200.00 12. Coast. P.C.C. Cross Gutter SF 675 $4.50 $3,037.50 $6.25 $4,218.75 1:3. 18" R.C.P. 1500D LF 187 $55.00 $10,285.00 $60.00 $11,220.00 14. Plant 24" Box tree EA. I $450.00 $450.00 $250.00 $250.00 15. Resod and Restore lffigation LS I $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 16. Relocate Stop & St. Name Signs EA 2 $250.00 $500.00 $200.00 $400.110 17. Traffic Striping & Signing I..S I $500.00 $500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TOTAL $48,817.50 $67,268.25 Shown as $49,357.50 HELLMAN AVENUE AT NINTH STREET LOCATION MAP CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ~i~i,!, .~ DATE: April 20, 994 STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopmerit Manager BY: Jan Reynolds, Assistant Redevelopmerit Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INCORPORATED (CO 92-064) TO ALLOW THE TENANT TO CONTINUE TO LEASE ADDITIONAL SPACE AT THE SPORTS COMPLEX FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1994 RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., which will allow for the continued lease of office spaces within the stadium building. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In July 1993, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the lease between the City and Valley Baseball Club, Inc., which allowed for the lease of two additional office spaces within the stadium. This additional lease space included rooms of approximately 157 square feet on the third floor and 189 square feet on the concourse level. A one year renewable term was established for the lease of additional space at a rate of $1.00 per square foot per month. The attached amendment renews the one year term of the lease established in the above-mentioned Amendment No. 2. All previously agreed terms remain the same'. annual renewal, and lease rate at $1.00 per month. This amendment applies only to the lease space agreed to in the original amendment with the same operation and maintenance responsibilities and does not add additional space. The team of the lease will remain one year renewable to allow the City the ability to use the additional space as necessary for future programming and City activities. Respectfully submitted, . Redevelopment Manager AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO LEASE This Amendment No. 5 is entered into as of , 1994, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("CITY" hereinafter) and VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INCORPORATED, a California Corporation ("FENANT" hereinafter). This Amendment hereby extends the term of the Additional Space designated in Amendment No. 2 to Lease entered into on July 7, 1993, between CITY and TENANT. Said term to commence on January 1, 1994, and conclude on December 31, 1994. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the Lease, as previously amended by Amendment Nos. 1 through 4, and each and every term and provision contained therein shall remain in full force and effect. Wherefore, CITY and TENANT have entered into this Amendment No. 5 as of the date set forth hereinabove. C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: By: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. Henry E. Stickhey, President 146 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: blayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wilt Jam J. O'k~e9, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gill iland, Public Works Inspector II~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF I~4PROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TP~ACT 12895, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BAKER AVENUE SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO CITILAND DEVELOPME~ ~EC{}~{MD~TIOM It is reckended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and securtl~V and authorizing the M~or and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACICGROUND/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Zmprovement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 12895 were approved by the City Council on February 2, 1989, and reduced by City Council on June 16, 1993 to the foil owing amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $118,000 Labor and Material Bond: $215,000 The developer, Rancho Cittland Development, is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete all remaining improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfull~~~ William J. O'Netl City Engineer WJO:S~G:dlw Attachments 147 ENVIRONMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. LAND USE PLANNING CONSULTANTS Post Office Box 5 · Glendora, California 91740 (818) 963-8465 / (818) 963-8712 March 31, 1994 Mr. Steve Gilliland Public Works Inspector Community Development Department Engineering Division The City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Subject: Request for 12 Month Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 12895 Dear Mr. Gilliland: In accordance with your letter dated 3-10-94 and on behalf of our client, Rancho Citiland Development, we respectfully request that the Improvement Agreement be extend 12 months to allow completion of the project. Attached are the requested 3 executed copies of the Improvement Agree- ment and a check in the amount of $251.00. Phase I and II of the project has been completed and Phases III and IV are currently under construction. It is antispated that all improve- ments will be completed by the end of the year. Your favorable decision is sought. incerely, lli~m~, Jr. Pr cc Rancho Citiland Development 148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EYTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of ~ancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 20, 1994, by Rancho Citiland Development as developer, for the improvement of publtc rtght-o+-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Baker Avenue south of Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 12895; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Hayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 149 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: )layor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13280, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD BETWEEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PREMIER HOMES RECOR~ENDATIOM It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City D erk to sign said agreement. BAOCGROUND/ANA~YSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13280 were approved by the City Council on Aprill 22, 1993, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $528,420 Labor and Material Bond: $264,210 The developer, Premier Homes, iS requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, Will lain J. O'Netl City Engineer WJO:SMG:dqw , Attachments City Of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Depa~unent Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13280 Dear Steve M. Gillfind, Public Works Inspector, In response to your letter regardin~ the Expiration of Improvemere Agreement we would like to extend the agreement for the maximum 12 months. We purchased the property in January 1993 and started our models on November 15, 1993~ The delay from the pumhase time until the start of the models was due to waitinS on the Design Review Committee and the lots to close. We are now moving forward with production. We have currently 19 homes in production with 17 sold. With a total of 78 lots to improve we will definitely need the 12 month extension. Please fred enclosed a check for the mount of $251.00, and the extension forms per your request. We appreciate your consideration and approval. Senior Vice President Premier Homes, PGI 2280 Wardlow Circle, Suite 250 Corona, CA 91720-2871 151 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TP, ACT 13280 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 20, lgg4, by Premier Homes as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Base Line Road between Mil~ iken Avenue and Rochester Avenue; and WHERE,, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13280; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolve% that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City D erk to attest thereto. 152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13851, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND CANISTEL AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ~OIIIEIIDATION It is recona~nded that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACJCGROIJNI)/AIIAJ, YSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13851 were approved by the City Council on January 30, 19g0, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,042,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 521,000 The developer, Pacific International Development, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement due to slow economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. City Engineer WJO:S~4G:sd Attachments PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. A Subsidiary of PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION CO., LTD. March 18, 1994 ""- Mr. Steve M. Gilliland ~.: Community Development Department .... Engineering Division · City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Request for Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 13851 Dear Mr. Gilliland: In accordance with your instructions, enclosed please find three (3) fully executed and noterized Improvement Agreement Extension forms and a check in the amount of $251.00 for processing the application. In addition, please f'md a copy of Housing Marketing Report published by The Meyers Group for your reference. Pacific International Development, Inc. hereby requests a one year extension of the Improvement Agreement as a result of continued depressed housing market due to the economic downturn we have experienced for the past two years. We have no alternative but continue to place the project on hold. According to the attached report, there still remains little or no demand for homes in the price ranging from $410,000 to $505,000 which we proposed to build. To date, we have completed rough grading, storm drains, all underground utilities, approximately 90% of curbs and gutten, and the south side block wall. Remaining work will include street paving, f'mal grading, landscaping, mill fencing, and street lighting. It is estimated that the remaining work could be completed within three months once the project is reactivated on the condition that housing market will improve significantly. All necessary precautions have been taken to control wind and storm erosions. If you have any questions and/or need additional information, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, Daniel Zau Vice President encl. 939 East Seventeenth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701 Tel: (714) 541-8927, Fax: (714) 568-1641 RESOLUTION NO. ~/~ (~}7D A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P. ANCHO CUCAI~ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TP~ACT 13851 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca'ifornia, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 20, 1994, by Pacific International Development as developer, for the improvement of public -ight-of-way adjacent to the ~eal property specifically described therein, and generally located on the northeast corner of Wl~son Avenue an~ Canistel Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13851; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal lfornia hereby resol yes, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the ~ayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 155 /- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector XL~~-- SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13945, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CITATION BUILDERS RECOleeE:NDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. IL~CKGIIOU!iD/AIIALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13945 were approved by the City Council on January 16, 1992, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $659,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $329,500.00 The developer, Citation Builders, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement due to the slow economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully ~ William J, O' City Engineer WjO:SNG:Iy Attachments March 22, 1994 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Dear Mr. Gilliland: I am in receipt of your letter dated March 10, 1994, regarding the expiration of the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13945. I would like to request this agreement be extended for another year to January 15, 1995. Construction has begun on the last 14 homes in this tract and this work is scheduled to be completed in Jul of 1994. The improvement work that remains to be completed is limited to ~e widening of Highland Avenue, City sidewalks within the tract, final pavement lift and street trees. It is anticipated to have all of this work completed during July of 1994. Thank you for your help with this extension. If I can provide any additional information for you, please contact me at 714/258-1300. Sincerely, CITATI BUILDERS Director of Construction 151011~lrtill Avenue, Suite 100, Tust~n, CA 92_ _~0 (714) 258-1300, FAX (714l 258-1415 RESOLUTION NO. ~/~ 0'~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13945 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 20, 1994, by Citation Builders as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of East Avenue and Highland Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13945; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 158 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~__~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14121, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, SUBMITI'ED BY J.P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT RECClI4ENDATION It is recomnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. B~ClCGROUNI)/~YSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public in~rovements for Tract 14121 were approved by the City Council on March 21, 1991, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $692,000 Labor and Material Bond: $346,000 The developer, J.P. Rhoades Development, is requesting approval of a 12- month extension on said improvement agreement due to the slow economic conditions. Copies of the l~rovement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'e~l~~ City Engineer WJO:)G:alr Attachments 159 J. P RHOADES DEVELOPMENT 1801-C Parkcourt Plar~ ~anta Ar~ CA g2701-~080 RO. Box 1973. ~qnta Ana. CA 92702-197~ (714) 972-9944 FAX (714) 973-086.5 Y, enne~h T. France . ,.~ Project ~Manal~er/Consuttant '! _,~, April 4, 1994 · Mr. Steve M. Gilliland CITY OF RANC~O CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 'Re: Improvements Agreement Extension for Tract 14121 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Dear Mr. Gilliland: Due to continued slow sales we have been unable to start construction on our final phase of Tract 14121. We are currently negotiating a start date for the last phase and will have all improvements completed within the next year. we have currently completed over 85% of the improvements and have only base and final paving of the last phase to complete. All bonds to complete the improvements are in place. We respectfully request an extension of the Improvements Agreement for Tract 14121 for 12 months. Sincerely, J.P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT Kenneth ~. France Project M~iTage~Consultant enc8 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC/V~ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVEHENT AGREEJ4ENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEHENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an In~provement Agreement Extension executed on April 20, 1994, by J.P. Rhoades Development as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 14121; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the )layor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 161 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gill iland, Public Works Inspector II <Z~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TP, ACT 13280 - LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD AT ELLENA AVENUE RECOleIEMDATIOIh The required improvements for Tract 13280 - Landscape have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $505,200. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13280 Landscape - located on the north side of Base Line Road at Ellena Avenue. DEVELOPER: The Will tam Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92658 Rel ease: Faithful Performance Bond $505,200 Respectfully submitted, Will lam J. O'Netl City Engineer WjO:SMG:dlw Attachment RE OL T O q4- o A RESOLUTION OF THE CIlY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJ(ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TP. ACT 13280 - LANDSCAPE, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13280 - Landscape have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certif.ying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resol yes, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 163 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: ril 20, 1994 STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: u~il~ Jam J. O'Ne9, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gill iland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COffiPLETION FOR TRACT 13280 - RAILROAD CROSSING, LOCATED ON KENYON WAY AT THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS The req,,ired improvements for Tract 13280 - Railroad Crossing have been completed in an acceptable manna% and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $240,000. BACI(GROUIG)/AIIAJ, YSIS Tract 13280 - Railroad Crossing - located at Kenyon W~y at the Southern Pacific Tracks. DEVELOPER: The Will Jam Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Nev~oort Beach, CA 92658 Rel ease: Faithful Performance Bond $240,000 Respectfully submi ted, ~(// William J. O'Ne~ City Engineer WJO:SNG:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~Z, ~ 7L// A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL nF THE CIl~f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TPJkCT 13280 - RAILROAD CROSSING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF'A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13280 - Rail road Crossing have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 165 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: '.,illJam J. O'Nefi, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gill iland, Public Works Inspector I~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13281 - LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECON[NDATION: The required improvements for Tract 13281 - Landscape have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City D ark to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $401,100. Tract 13281 - Landscape - located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Rochester Avenue. DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Ne~ort Beach, CA 92654 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $401,100 Rospe~tfully William J. O'Neil City Engineer WjO:SMG:olw Attachment 166 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13281 - LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMI>LETION FOR THE WOI!( WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13281 Landscape have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resol yes, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the Count,v Recorder of San Be-nardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilltland, Public Works Inspecto~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 13753 LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD AT ELLENA AVENUE REC01IENDATION: The required improvements for Tract 13753 - Landscape have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $225,700. BACICGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 13753 - Landscape - located on the north side of Base Line Road at ~lena Avenue. DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Ne~ort Beach, CA 92658 Release: Faithful Performance Bond $225,700 Respectfully submt~6y}/~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~' D'7~p A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT~ CQU~'CIL OF THE CITY OF PJ~NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TPJ~CT 13753 - LANDSCAPE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOI~< WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 13753 - Landscape have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby reso! yes, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 189 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Men~aers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector II~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR CUP 90-18, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH OF 4TH SLEET RECgN{MOATION: The required street improvements for CUP 90-18 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $137,211.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS CUP 90-18 - located on the west side of Santa Anita Avenue north of 4th Street DEVELOPER: Martin J. Jaska 10723 Bell Court Rancho Cucamenga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $137,211.00 Respectfully subm~,~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WjO:SMG:sd Attachment 170 RESOLUTION NO. ~' (~) 7 7 A RESOLUTZON OF THE CZTY COUNCIL OF THE CZTY OF RANCHO CUCNqONGA, CALZFORNZA, ACCEPTZNG THE PUBLZC ZHPROVEHENTS FOR CUP g0-18 AND AUTHORIZZNG THE FZLING OF A NOTZCE OF CO~IPLETZON FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of pub]fc improvements for CUP gO-18 have been completed to the satisfaction of the Ctty Englneer; and WHEREAS, 8 Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work compl ere. NOW, THEREFORE, the Ctty Counctl of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work ts hereby accepted and the City Engtneer ts authorized to sign and file 8 Notlce of Completion wlth the County Recorder of San Bernardlno County. 171 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: I~ill Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gill iland, Public Works Inspector II~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 9350, LOCATED ON BASE LINE ROAD BEll4EEN MILLIKEN AVENUE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE RECOR(NDAT I ON: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 9350 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of $1,191,904; $385,131, and $457,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 9350 - located on Base Line Road between Milltken Avenue and Rochester Avenue. DEVELOPER: The Will Jam Lyon Company 4490 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92658 Release: Base Line Rd. Infrastructure Medians Faith ful Performance Bond $1,191, g04 $385,131 $457, OOO Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Netl City Engineer WjO:SMG:dlw Attachment 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FDR PARCEL MAP 9350 AND AUTHORIZING THE F!LING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map g350 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspect~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13441, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF KENYON WAY AND VICTORIA PARK LANE R~(]~!ENDATION It is recomended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. liJ~.I(GROUIII)/AXAI. YSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Grupe Development 2659 Townsgate Road, Suite 107 Westlake Village, CA 91361 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $30,000.00 Respectfully su~~ William d. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SMG:sd CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor, and Members of the City Council 'jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto~~ SUBJECT: RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR TRACT 13930 - LANDSCAPE, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HELLMAN AVENUE AT WILSON AVENUE RF,~(I~ENDATION It is recomnended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROUMD/AIIALYSIS The required one year maintenance period has ended and the landscape improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Hix Development 437 S. Cataract Avenue Suite 3 San Dims, California 91773 Release: Meintenance Guarantee Bond $22,800.00 City Engineer WjO:SMG:ly 175 CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA ~ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Associate Park Planner SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CO#93-070. RECOMMENDATIONZ That the City Council accept the Neighborhood Center Improvement Project as complete, authorize the release of the appropriate bonds and retention in a timely manner and authorize the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Completion. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center improvements have been completed in an acceptable manner by R.E. Fleming Construction, Inc., and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, and authorize the Community Development Director to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $37,398.00. Resp c~ ~u tted, · ( ez ' ~ Development Director 176 A ~3ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK. W~EREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Neighborhood Center Improvement Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that the work is hereby accepted and the Director of Community Development is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1994. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk I, DEBEA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a reqular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of April, 1994. Executed this day of April, 1994 at RanchoCucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ORDINANCE N0. 521 AN ~A~uINANCE OF IHE CA'i~ O0~q~rX. OF ~ME Cl'i~ OF RANCSO AM~ 94-02, ~ING SUBAREA 7 'IO AILOW t.'tl~'A~ (2X~ AND ID MDDIFY ~ D~2'L~A'A'AC~ OF "AUi~ 1. On the 23rd day of Febr, mvy 1994, the Platmira:/~-,-,,~-~iCel of the City of Ranc~o Cucamonqa corr]uc~a a duly noticed public hearing with respect the cunclusic~ of said public h~ring, the Planning O-,-,,i-~qicm ~a.~tea Resolutic~ No. 94-10, thereby rec~er~ng that the City Council ~t ~ial Specific Plan Amendment 94-02. 2. On April 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduc~a a duly noticed public hearing and cc~cl,~a said b~ing prier to its adoption of this Ordinance. 3. All legal ~ee,~ites pric~ to the ado~fcion of this Ord/nance B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho ~ hereby ~dains as follows: SEul'lON 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that ~ll of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of th/s Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Tn/s Council hereby finds and certifies that the ~x~ject Envirccmental Quality ~c of 1970, and further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SEu£1C~ 3: ~he Rancho Cucamonga City Council finds and cc~cluclee as follows: a. The subject pro~rty is suitable for the u~es permi~a in the ~o~osed district in terms of access, size, and ~-!~etibility with b. The ~u~osed cbarr/e would not have significant adverse Plan; and d. ~ba ~rr]~_nt does not cc~flict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will ~ovide f~r develu~nt within the a~-~t~ict in a manner ccrsiste~t with the General Plan and with rela~a devel~.-,--nt; and 178 Clrdtnance No. 521 Pacje2 the ~t,~ia] Area Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is loc~a_; and f. ~le proposed amendment is in oc,~liance with each of the applicable prov/sic~s of the ~ial Area Specific Plan; and public health, safety, or welfare cr materially injurious to pLu~erties or i~ .... ¢us in the vicinity; and objectives of the General Plan ur the Iraustr~! Area Specific Phn. ~j~'-C~ 4: ~he City-Council of the city of ]~ancho ~wm~rja hereby a~uvee ~ia] Area Specific Pla~ iqam~rim~qt NO. 94-02, ~ the Table III-2 as attached. after its ~n~--~tge at ]-~-t once in ~he Inland Valley Daily ~,~l~-in, a 179 Ozllirklnce No. 521 Page3 Pr' Functicm: Subarea 7 occupies an area a~cly south of Foothill Boulevard ~hic~ ~-~nts an important lara use ~ between the City's 13zlustr~l Area ~ a 1~3e mastPr planned o-,-,,~m.i.t~ to the r~rth. Focfchill B~ulevard is the City's primary c~ercial c~rridar and serves as a gateway to the City. Alc~/Foothill Boulevard, the intersections at HaM, Milliken, and Rochester Ave~,~ have been a~ignat~a as activity centers to prcmote ccrr~ntratea activity and establish a unique design theme. Special Consideration "Foothill Boule~3rd is a major arterial which is ~=ojec~a to carry a significant vol,m~ of traffic. In c~der to limit vehicular ao~ ~obl~m~; the minihum parcel size requir~t al~g Foothill Boulevard is 2 acids and min~mm parcel width is 200 feet. F~r ~cy within the baz~ies of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, refer to the Overlay District f~r a m~I fied list of permitted_ land uses and s~ecial The San Bernardino C~unty Law and Justice Oenter ~v the cu~er of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue may include a detention facility if mmicipal court facilities are provided. On the ~t side of Haven Avenue n~rth of Arrow Highway, Devel~ent Code l~ovisions f~r the Genez-al CaLiLer~ial District shall apply to K Mart and the adjoining n~cherly building. Develul~Rnt and use of satellite blildings in the K Mart Center are subject to provisions of the Industial Are Specific Plan. At the awest corner of Foothill Boulevard and R~ch~_er Avenue, adjoining allowed in the R__~c~tional O~,~rcial general plan land ~ cat~y shall be permitt_~d within the planned 27-acre mixed use center. To preserve and enlklnce the Im~ge of the c~]nity, special cxmsia~r'~tic~ls shall be given to the quality of site a~ign, architecture, and lands~_pi~ of all ~erties adjacent to the I-5 Fm~way. Attractive s=~ning of a significant freeway points of view shall be re~.d~ed. 180 CTdinance No. 521 Page4 9R~R III-2 IAND USE TYPE DEF/I~TIC~S A~ S~RVICE CO~T: An inte~t~a cluster of related au~-rm~cive service service and repa~ including mufflers, shocks, ali~-,--nts, :..~, oil w]_-a~a%ields, and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale of auto parts; and other relat~a services. Auto Oourts shall ~-~.ly with the following a~ign criteria: - Maximum Size: 4 acres. -- Maximam frceltage along a mjcr cr ~l-i-_-~,y ~i~l street: 300 feet. - No access to the site will be pe~.~.~t~a_ a~.~-~cly off any majcT - Service bays and pump islands shall be screened £L~ a]] majcr and secc~a-v~] arterial~ thr~ a ~inatic~ of betins, ~erimeter of the site to ~in~,n~re the ~.,~--t of the auto c~urt ~xuhibit~a. - All signage shall be ]~m~ted to signs aRuroved ~ a Unif~ Sign PL~. 181 C:E~ NO. 522' AN C~3]~]ANCE OF ~E cl'l~{ ~. OF ~ ur,~' OF RANC~O (I1CAMZNT~, C~T,TlrCa~T/A, Ak,I~MOVING DEVELOPM~N[ 0DOE E 94-01, AM]~D~lqG C}]Ak'r~S 17.08, 17.10 AhI) 17.12 OF ~]E PANe CUCAMDNCA M/~ICIPAL CODE, RIr4~DM SUPP(~I~RI~0F. A. Recitals. (i) On Ma~d~ 9, 1994, the Planning O-.-..~mic~ of the City of Rancho O,m~r~nga conducted a ~,ly noticed public hearing with respect to the above- public hearing, the Planning n..-,,~ion adu~tad Resolution No. 94-16, thereby rec~ema{ng that the City Council ~a.~ot Devel<t'~!~nt Cede Ame_nam~nt No. 94-01. (ii) On April 6, 1994, the City Ccuncil of the City of Rancho Ow-~mmnga ccrauc~a a da~ly noticed public hearing and ccr~b~a said h~ing priur to adoption of th/s Ordinance. (iii) All legal prere~itee ~ricr to the adultion of this Ordinance B. 0rdinance ~he City Council of the City of Ranc~ ~,.~,,~lcla u~dains as follows: SECTION 1: This Council hereby specifies and finds that a~3 of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of the Ordirk3rr~ a~e tl~ae and correct. SECTION 2: ~ Council hereby finds and certifies that the [xu~sed ~Tvi~en~R! Quality Act (C~A) Of 1970, and determines that the ~uFz~e~ ame=rbant will establish proceck~res to b~]p ~,,:,,uve ~ q~ty, ar~ thereruLe the amendment is categcrically ex~t £~a envh~mental revie~ provisions of the Califu~x~ia ~T~il~3r~emtal Quality Act (C~A), per Section 15061(b)(3) of file a Notice of Ex~tion pursuant to C~aA Guidelines Sectira 15062, regardingthismatter. S~gJriON 3: Section 17.08.030.E.8 is hereby ~n~a~a to r~ in ~de err] figures as follows: 8. Tel~'~'~.-...Fci~q Centerre. 84--1e-fmn41y developmet more units ,~.,,r~ ~ a e-~..,. ...... ~4 ,-',' center or contribute of 500 development of one in an amount satisfactoz? to the City Council. SECT/~4: Sectice 17.08.090.C. 3 of is hereby amended to r~a in w~ds and figures as follows: ~a'memver possible. Vehicular az~ pedestrian t~fic shall separat~,~_, to the ezten~ pessible, throt~ ~le t~e of a ~,Lirae~ syste~ of interconnected public and private sidealks. SECT/~5: Sectic~ 17.010.030.F.? is hereby ~ to rn~a in ~C~ and figures as follows: 7. Office turks with 1,000 eeDloV~es SECTI~6: Sectic~ 17.10.060.C.1.C is h~-t4~ 8nmra=a to rn~a in words and figures as follows: 1. ~... (c) ~---/Circulati~: ~he access and cLrculattcn of a devel~?~,L shaa/d ~e a~aigned to ~ufide a safe and efficient e/Turn, both c~ and off the site. Points of __~ shall be a__cc.~ shall not u.~u~lict with other planned or ~ points. Pedestrian wa/luea~B stmll ccnmect ever~ ~ with pub]/c sideelks. SECTIC~ 7: Section 17.10.060.C.l.i ~s l~_neby w~a~a to ~ in ~ds and figures as follows: c. Guidelines 1. Site Plan Design . (i) Transit ~.~ts. Transit ~.~;v~te such as bus StDur~oN 8: Section 17.10.070 is h~n~by w~a~a to ~ in ~C~ and figures as follows: A. A m{n'B~m~ Of c~e shower f,,-{l{ty aoceesible to both ~ and ~ shall be prvvided for perkins ~al~-g. or ~ to work for project which neets the fo~ thresholds= d"'r'em~r~'~,el 250,000 BC~TELre feet IMustrial 325,000 quare feet Office 125,000 quare feet BoteZs am4 Motels 250 ~ B. Office Par~s with 1000 cr m~re eq~loyees ,,~ ~A~v~e ca-site S~'TICN 9: Section 17.12.040.C.1, .2, .3 and .4 is k~_~k~/.n.~a to ~ in ~.~.~ and figures as follcx;s: C. Suecial ~ecn~-~,~cs. ~e followirg parki~ rec/u/r~m~cs are aX~lj~-~hle to ~ multi-family resi~enH-~ ~ ~.~_rc-~ and officm land uses as 4esic~a~,~4. ~ Special stalls s~l~ be clcses~ to the fac~{ty fcr 1. ~-a~,~..TT~a; ~b~-~ commercial area office facilities with l~mtT-five (25) cr ~.~-e s~aces s~n ao~ignate two (2) percent c,r one (1) s~De, M~m~ver is %~ater, of the rural ~_~.~r of s~alis for use by ~e 184 2. Motorcycle: commercial and offic~ Facilities with twenty-five (25) CT mn~e parking spaces shall ~Avdde at least one designated parking area for use by mc~_nrcycles. Devel~.-,~nts with over one hundred (100) b-A3aces shall [~u~ide ~e parkir~ at the rate of c~e percent. Am~- delineated for use by motorcycles shall ~ stara.vds set forth ira s~/ksectic~l 17.12.030-C-1. 3. Bicycle St~_~rage: Bicycle stoA~ge spaces shall be provia~a in all M,~ti-fam{ly :esidem~{-l pr~mJects of ~ tham 10 %mAts, ~ial, office, and industrial a~-t~icts in accordanoe with the following: (a) Mi-~m-- spaces ~ to 5 percent of the required am~hile parkin~ span~ or ~ 3 bicycle stok~ge spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are additional st~ge spaces requ~med are 2.5 peruent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warebause a~tributicn uses ~Au~ide bicycle StrAnge spaoes at a rate of 2.5 peroent of the 1'e~i. Hwed autcmobile parking spaces with a miniram of a 3-bike re~,{~ed ~ 100. Mlere this results in a fracticml of 0.5 or greater, the m_~b~r shall be rou~dma off to the higher whole 4. Car pcols/vanpools: off-street.parkin~ close to the ~ .~ll he ~Au~ia~a for cx~mmrcial/office/ industrial facilitie~/ N~. ~ 7 / ~t~de at ;~ the rate cf ten (10) percent of the total parkin~ area as a~ignat~d for use by car pools and. vanpools. If ~evered, the vertiua clearance shall he no less than 9 feet. SECT/ON 10: Sectic~ 17.12.040.D is heA~by mm~ded to puma in w~s and figures as follows: D. Mi~IParkin~ ~w.~m and P~{-~ Stead_are P=u~is{nnq, ~he followira/ may be required by the Cit7 p3.~ or ~Au~a~a a~ the ~tic~ of . parking uses. Secticrs 17.12,040.D.1, .2 and .3 ~'eunin the s~a~ces, and ~AaS of ~ Ordinance shall A--'--~n in full f~ and effect. 186 SECTICN 12: ~e City Clerk shall certify the ~.~ption of this Onlinance and shall cause the same to be pabl~ within 15 days after its tklssage at l~t once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a news1~per of general circulati~ published in the City of Ontario, c~]ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. CI~INANCE NO o 523 AN OI~)INANCE OF THE ~A'i'f (IXalc,,. OF ~ LLL'A~ OF RANCI-I) ~, C~T.~, APA-T~)VING ~~ ~ ~'AC ~ ~ 94~1, ~M PE ~T, ~M ~ ~F A. Recitals. (i) On March 9, 1994, the Planning r~-,.,,i~ical of the City of Ranclio n,~mcnia corauc~a a a,qy noti~a public h~in~ with respect to the above- referenced L-al~ ial Area Specific Plan ~. Following the ccnclusim of said public hearing, the planning O-,,,,,i~ic~ a~,]~a Resolutio~l No. 94-17, thereby rec~aralng that the City Council a~t ~ial Area Specific Plan AllRrdm~lt No. 94-01. (ii) On April 6, 1994, the City Council of the City of Ranci~ ~w~m~nga conduct~a a duly noticed public hearing and ocmc],d~a said hearing pricar to ad, ptic~l of this Ordinance. (iii) All legal pAerBe,i-~ites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance B. Ordinance ~he City Council of the City of Pancho a,c~mc~ga uAdains as follows: SEuA'iON i: B Council hereby specifies ar~ finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reci~q~, Part A, of the Ordirklnoe are true and __n~rrect. SECTI~2: This Council hereby finds and cer+i~ias that the pr~ D~virc2-~nt~ ~x~allty/~c (C~D~) of 1970, ar~ cletamnir~ ~-,a~ the ~x,.sl t.~ Califc~-nia Znvi~,.~,..er~'~ ~mlity ~ (Cm~), per Sec~icn LS061(b)(3) of ~.ile a No~ice of ~.,~,,,.~Lion ixwsuar~c to ~ 0uicleli_,'~ Section 15O62, m~jaz~lir~t. hBm~.er. Sl~,tu.0N 3: ~ Rarnho OEam:m~ City Oct'oil flrds as follo~: a. ~at ~ p,.,4~o~d amer,"~c is c,m's~ with the ~bjectives Of the ~lal Area Specific Plan, and the ~ of the Di~tAict in which the site is located; and public N~lth, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or 187 d. ~lat the ~icl~.~d amendment will not ~e detr~ntal to t/le objectives of. the General Plan or the Irrk~t~ I~1 Az'ea Specific Plan. SECTICN 4: Tthe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucam~nga does hereby aFd~ve Irrit~t~ial Area Specific Pla~ Am~Xiz~Qt 94-01, e_rrLi~g Part ~II to ~ in ~d and figures as follows: Part III Sectira III B.2 B. 2. ~he a_cc~= and circulatic~ of a [xu~ide a safe ar~ efficient sys~, both c~ and off the site. Points of access shall be a~igned in with the City access re~ulati~s. p~a~-tria]l traffic, ~li~m~ze and a~ ar~ whe~% pcesible, and Points of an~q shall not conflict with Transit ~.-T-~v-a~-ts such as B.7. Ocmvenient p~crian c~_,~tim shall and public t~nsit facilities with Partl/~SecticelIVF. 2 same site with the main use of the thei~o, cr in a locatim in accordance 188 fsc~lit~es at the rate of 10 covered, the w~t~cal cl~ Bible ~ ~ ~ ~1 V~ ~cili~ F.4. Bible ~ ~ili~ at (~ o~ a ~~ ~} m~ ~ p~ ~ ~ ~1 250,000 ~4.~ 325,000 ~Zi~ ~5,000 ~ i ~ 250 i~ ~ at ]~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Vall~ ~ilv ~1~, of ~ c~m ~1~ ~ ~ Ci~ of ~io, ~E~, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: ~ Mayor and Members of the C' oundl FROM: Jack Lam AICP, City Mana · ~ ~* ~ SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON BOOKING FEES AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACF WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY This item was presented to City Council on February 16, 1994. However, the labor negotiations between the Sheriffs Employees Benefit Association (SEBA) and the County caused the County to delay consideration of the agreement. Now that the labor dispute has been settled, the County has informed the Contract Cities that it wishes to move ahead with the original agreement. Please note that the agreement "new" contract basically reflects the resolution of the booking fees as the major component. Schedule "A's" and other financial provisions are a duplicate of that which we currently have. All added costs of contract services, as a result of the labor settlement, will be separate from this contract and dealt with as part of next year's budget. Attachments: Staff report - February 16, 1994 Memorandum - February 14, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 16, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON BOOKING FEES AND ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E MMENDATI That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Settlement Agreement on Booking Fees and the Amended Law Enforcement Contract with San 13ernardino County. The cities in San Bernardino County have been involved in a protracted lawsuit with San Bernardino County regarding the payment of Booking Fees. The adoption of SB 2557 in July of 1990, enabled counties to retroactively charge cities and other entities for expenses incurred after July 1, 1990, in connection with the booking or other processing of persons arrested by employees of the cities and other entities. Governmcnt Code Section 29550 requires that the amount of the fee not exceed the actual administrative cost, including applicable overhead costs as permitted by Federal Circular A-87 standards, incurred in booking or otherwise processing those arres'~.d persons. In January of 1991, the County adopted Ordinance No. 3428 charging each city a criminal justice administrative fee, retroactive to July 1, 1990, in the amount of $122.90 for each designated booking performed by the County in connection with arrests made within the jurisdictional boundaries of the respective city. If the fees were not paid by the city, the County began withholding property taxes for payment. In March of 1991, the cities filed suit against the County challenging the validity of Ordinance No. 3428 and therefore the San Bemardino Superior Court issued a temperaty restraining order and issued a prolirninary injunction, prohibiting the CoUnty from unilaterally withholding property taxes. In October of 1991, the lawsuit was added on to Judicial Counsel Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, wherein several cities in the State challenged the legality of Govemroent Code ,Section 29550 and actions taken by their respective counties in connection therewith. In September of 1992, the court in the Coordinated Proceeding that had previously upheld the validity and constitutionality of criminal justice administrative fees, entered an order providing that the Contract Cities of San 13ernardino County were exempt from payment of any such fee under the language of their contracts with the County for law enforcement services. This decision is currently on appeal by the County. Cities have refused to sign the new contracts, and subsequently, County officials threatened to recommend discontinuing of law enforcement sen'ices to the Contract Cities if the language of the contracts was not changed to permit the County to collect both the contract amount and the criminal justice administrative fee from the Contract Cities. SE'rrLI~4ENT AGREEMENT ON BOOKING FEES & LAW ENFE)RCEMENT CONTRACT February 16, 1994 Page 2 After two years of negotiations, the attached agreement has been reached by the Contract Cities and the County for the purpose of resolving many of the issues addressed in the lawsuit without furthe~ costly litigation. The remaining issue to be settled by the court will be the actual amount that the County may charge for the criminal justice administrative fee. The proposed agreement specifies: 1. For bookings occurring between July 1, 1990 and December 31, 1993, the Contract Cities shall pay a criminal justice administrative fee in the amount of $61.45 (50%) for each booking. 2. For beokinge occurring after December 31, 1993, the Contract Cities shall pay a criminal justice administrative fee in the amount of $122.90. This amount may be amended pending the Coml's decision and the effect of Assembly llill 2286 which requires the County to recalculate the criminal justice administrative fee. If the County Booking Fee is reduced, the cities will be credited for the difference and vice-versa. As a result of this agreement, the Contract has been modified to reflect payment of the booking fees beginning January 1, 1994. The following reflect some of these revisions within the new contract: 1. Section II - Subsections G and H were deleted from the contract. Subsection G listed lan~uag~ which stated that jail facilities and services would be part of the contract. Subsection H states that the Sheriff will provide all of the law enforcement services in the City that a~ customarily provided in the unincorporsted areas. (These changes appears to subject cities to the booking ~ee as does the new paragraph that follows.) '~Iothing in this contract is intended to alter the effect of any statute or county ordinance related to fees for housing of inmates detained for City ordinance violations or for criminal justice administrative fees (Goven~ment Code 29SSO, San Bernardino County Code 16.027A). The City will be separately billed for those items.' 2. SecHon IV - In the tirst paragraph, the language has changed between the old and new contracts; however, the intent of the language to provide for peyrnent of the contract on a monthly basis is still the same. 3. Sec6on~- Language was added to the tirst paragraph which would char~ simple interest to Cities on past due balances owed the County. The contract calls for payments to be made to the County by the Sth of the month. The new language would charge interest on amounts owed the County tlmtsre outstanding 60 days after they are due. (This will not have any impact on the Rancho Cucamonge since we remit on a timely basis.) 4. Section IV - In the second paragraph and fourth line of the new contract the words "agents" and "volunteers" are added to the Hst of County personnel that the City will hold harmless in respect to any action taken in enforcing a City ordinance. (This chan~e takes into account the Citizen's Paffol and the Reserves.) 5. SectionV- The first paragraph has been changed within the old contract. The old contract allowed for the agreement to be canceled by either party at any time without cause with 180 days notice. The new agreement provides for one year termination notice. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON BOOKING FEES & LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT February 16, 1994 Page 3 6. BIr, RolLY_R - In the second paragraph in the fourth line of the new contract language has been added that speci'fically refers to but does not limit the contract to application of the provisions of Penal Code Section 1463 in defining arrests by SherifFs Deputies as officers employed by the City. (This change appears to support the County's Booking Fee position.) JL/dja Attachments: Proposed Settlement Agreement Revised Law Enforcement Contract Old Contract SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as "the Agreement") is entered into as of the day of 199__, by and between the TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF BIG BEAk LAKE, CITY OF GRAND TERRACE, CITY OF HESPERIA, CITY OF HIGHLAND, CITY OF LOMA LINDA, CITY OF NEEDLES, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CITY OF VICTORVILLE, and CITY OF YUCAIPA (hereinafter referred to as "the Contract Cities") and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (hereinafter referred to as "the County" ). RECITALS A. The Contract Cities are cities duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California and are located within the jurisdictional boundaries of San Bernardino County. B. The County is a county duly organized and existing as a political subdivision of the State of California. C. The County and the Contract Cities have entered into separate agreements wherein the County provides law enforcement services to the Contract Cities pursuant to the terms thereof. D. On or about July 1, 1990, Senate Bill 2557 was signed by the Governor of the State of California as a non-urgency measure. Senate Bill 2557 was subsequently codified as California Government Code Section 29550, and became effective January 1, 1991. Pursuant to Government Code Section 29550, counties were authorized to retroactively charge cities and other entities for expenses incurred after July 1, 1990, in connection with the booking or other processing of persons arrested by employees Of the cities and other entities. Government Code Section 29550 requires that the amount of the fee not exceed the actual administrative costs, including applicable overhead costs as permitted by federal Circular A-87 standards, incurred in booking or otherwise processing those arrested persons. E. Pursuant to Section 29550 of the Government Code, on or about January 14, 1991, the County adopted Ordinance No. 3428 (County Code Section 16. 027A) authorizing the County to charge each Contract City a criminal Justice administrative fee, retroactive to July 1, 1990, in the amount of 8122.90 for each designated booking performed by the County in connection with arrests made within the Jurisdictional boundaries of the respective Contract City. F. On or about February 13, 1991, the County began charging each Contract City a criminal Justice administrative fee pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. 3428 ( County Code Section 16.027A). If said fees were not paid, the County thereafter began 194 withholding certain funds from the Contract Cities for the payment thereof. G. On or about March 15, 1991, the Contract Cities filed suit against the County in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Case Number 262309 (hereinafter referred to as "the Lawsuit"), challenging the validity of Ordinance No. 3428. H. On May 14, 1991, the San Bernardino Superior Court issued a temporary restraining order, and on May 28, 1991, issued a preliminary injunction, prohibiting the County from unilaterally withholding any criminal Justice administrative fees which had been disputed by the Contract Cities under Government Code Section 907 from certain funds which were due and owing to the Contract Cities. I. On or about October 17, 1991, the Lawsuit was added on to Judicial Counsel Coordination Proceeding No. 2584 (hereinafter referred to as "the Coordinated Proceeding") wherein several cities within the State of California challenged the legality of Government Code Section 29550 and actions taken by their respective counties in connection therewith. J- On or about September 1, 1992, the court in the Coordinated Proceeding that had previously upheld the validity and constitutionality of criminal Justice administrative fees entered an order providing that the Contract Cities were exempt from payment of any such fee under the language of their contracts with the County for law enforcement services. K. The County has threatened to discontinue providing law enforcement services to the Contract Cities if the language of the contracts is not changed to permit the County to collect both the contract amount and the criminal Justice administrative fee from the Contract Cities. L. With the concurrence of representatives from the Contract Cities, the County has prepared an Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract for signature by the Contract Cities. M. The County and the Contract Cities desire to enter in this Agreement for the purpose of resolving many of the issues addressed in the Lawsuit without any further litigation, and are entering into this Agreement for said purpose. This Agreement shall never be treated or otherwise construed as an admission of liability by any party for any purpose. COVENANTS NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding Recitals and the mutual Covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 2 1. Settlement of Lawsuit. This Agreement shall resolve all issues addressed in the Lawsuit except the proper amount of the criminal Justice administrative fee imposed by the County. Any judgment and/or order entered by the court in the Coordinated Proceeding or in the Lawsuit shall not be inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement insofar as said Judgment and/or order would apply to the parties hereto. The parties hereto agree to seek a stipulated Judgment in the Coordinated Proceeding and in the Lawsuit that is consistent with this Agreement and that will reference and/or incorporate this Agreement. The County agrees not to appeal the decision of the Coordination Court exempting the Contract Cities from the payment of a criminal justice administrative fee pursuant to the language of their contracts with the County for law enforcement services. 2. Invalidation of Criminal Justice Administrative Fee. Notwithstanding Section 1 Of this Agreement, if a final decision of a state or federal court, including any applicable appellate court decision, holds that the underlying California Government Code Section 29550 is invalid, or otherwise rules that the County may not impose a criminal Justice administrative fee, Or if subsequent state or federal legislation repeals or removes the authority of the County to charge a criminal Justice administrative fee, the Contract Cities shall not be obligated to paT any criminal Justice administrative fee, including those fees agreed to in this Agreement, for any arrests made after the effective date of said final decision. Except as set forth above, this paragraph shall not apply to the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract. 3. Payment Of Criminal Justice Administrative Fees. Subject to Section 2 of this Agreement, the Contract Cities shall pay to the County a criminal Justice administrative fee as set forth below: a. Bookinus Occurrinu Between July 1. 1990. and December 31, 1993. Subject to the provisions of Section 5 of this Agreement, each Contract City shall pay a criminal Justice administrative fee in the amount of S61.45 for each booking or other processing performed by the County in connection with arrests made within the Jurisdictional boundaries of the respective Contract City for which such a fee is imposedby Ordinance No. 3428' (County Code Section 16,027A) for the time period between July 1, 1990, and December 31, 1993. Upon execution of this Agreement, the County shall calculate the amount owed by each Contract City accordingly and shall bill each Contract City separately. Except for specific challenges contending that a particular booking or other processing charge is not properly allocable to the challenging Contract City under the provisions of-Ordinance NO. 3428 (County Code Section 16,027A) or the County's substantial non- compliance with the terms of this Agreement, said bill shall be payable within sixty (60) days of receipt by the Contract City. Any funds withheld by the County for payment of the criminal 3 justice administrative fee prior to the court's issuance of the restraining order in the Lawsuit shall be credited to the appropriate Contract City and reflected in the County's invoice. The appropriate Contract City shall also be credited for any criminal justice administrative fees which it has voluntarily paid to the County. b. Bookinqs Occurrinq After December 31, 199~. Subject to the provisions of Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement, each Contract City shall pay a criminal Justice fee in the amount of S122.90, or an amount as recalculated pursuant to Sections 4 and 5 of this Agreement or as otherwise mandated by subsequent State legislation, for each booking or other processing performed by the County in connection with arrests made within the jurisdictional boundaries of the respective Contract City after December 31, 1993, for which such a fee is imposed by Ordinance No. 3428 (County Code Section 16.027A). Said fees shall be paid within the time set forth in the County invoice. Nothing heroin shall be treated as a waiver of the ability of the Contract Cities to contest any recalculation of the County's criminal Justice administrative fee. 4. Effect of Assembly Bill 2286. Assembly Bill 2286 amends Sections 29550, 29550.1, and 29550.2 of the California Government Code such that the County will be required to recalculate the Mount of its criminal Justice administrative fee. If the effect of Assembly Bill 2286 is to reduce the County's criminal Justice administrative fee to an amount below S122~90 per booking, the application of said reduced fee shall be retroactive to January 1, 1994, and the Contract Cities shall be credited accordingly. If the effect of Assembly Bill 2286 is to increase the County's criminal Justice administrative fee to an amount above S122.90 per booking, the application of said increased fee shall not take effect until the effective date of the County's ordinance approving said increase. Nothing heroin shall be treated as a waiver of the ability of the Contract Cities to contest the County's recalculation of its criminal Justice administrative fee pursuant to Assembly Bill 2286. 5. Effect of Coordinated Proceeding. The court in the Coordinated Proceeding has bifurcated the issue of the scope and amount of the criminal Justice administrative fee. The court apparently envisions a two-step process whereby the court will first develop an appropriate formula for calculating the criminal Justice administrative fee, and then examine that formula as applied to each county. Trial on the first phase has been set for March of 1994. If, as a result of the final decision in the Coordinated Proceeding, the amount of the County's criminal Justice administrative fee is reduced, the application of said reduction shall be retroactive to January 1, 1994, and the Contract Cities shall be credited accordingly. If, as a result of the Coordinated Proceeding, the amount of the County's criminal Justice administrative fee is reduced to an amount below $61.45 per booking] the application of said reduced fee shall be retroactive to July 1, 1990, and the Contract Cities shall be credited accordingly. The Contract Cities agree that they will seek no relief in the Lawsuit or Coordinated Proceeding except as to the proper amount of the criminal Justice administrative fee charged by the County. 6. Execution of Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Contract Cities agree to enter into an Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract with the County effective January 1, 1994, which contract was developed as indicated in Recital "L" of this Agreement. The Contract Cities shall comply with the terms of this Agreement notwithstanding any inconsistent provision or provisions of said Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract. 7. Amendments. This is an entire agreement and supersedes all prior agreements oral or written between the parties, and their agents, and cannot be amended unless in writing, with specific reference hereto by the parties authorized to be charged. Failure by any party to enforce any provisions shall not constitute a waiver. of said party's rights to enforce subsequent violation of the same or any other provisions. 8. Inurement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties. 9. Captions. The captions of Sections and Subsections of this Agreement are for reference only and are not to be construed in any way as part Of this Agreement. 10. Validity. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 11. Severabili%7. If any section, clause Or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or unlawful, such a decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. 12. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be a part of the original. 13. Fees and Expenses. Each party to this Agreement shall bear their own attorneys' fees and expenses. 5 198 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to . be executed by their respective officers as of this dat~ first above written. Dated: , 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Title: Dated: , 1994 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Chairman, Boardof Supervisors 13 199 FOR COUNTY USE ONLY E L ' New Vendor Code ~ i Dept. ~A Contract Number ~' County Department Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. SaF.,E~FF SHE SHE L ~Y ~, D~U'I~ CHIEF 387-3660 $7,588,444.00 County of San Bernardino ~ ~ Or~a,iza~io. Ap~r. Obj/Rev Source Activity GRC/PROJ/~OB N~mber 960 9565 9609565E STANDARD CONTRACT ~Y Project Name 94 7~588~444 CO~ THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereinafter called the County, and Name C[~ O~ ~ ~ hereinafter called CZ~ ~0 ~, ~ 9Z730 Phone 8i~h Date Federal IO NO. or Social Security No. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: '~ space below and additional bond sheets. Set fo~h service to be rendered, amount to be paid, manner of payment, time for performance or completion. rmination of satisfacto~ performance and cause for termination, other terms and conditions, and a~ach plans, sDecifications, and a~en~a, ~f any ) ~HEREAS, CITY and COUNTY desire to provide by contract for performance of law enforcement services within the territorial boundaries of CITY; NOV, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOVS: I. COUNTY shall provide, through the Sheriff of San Bernardino County (hereinafter referred to as "Sheriff"), 'law enforcement within the corporate limits of CITY as same now exist, or as such limits may be modified by annexation or exclusion during the term of this agreesant. II. The law enforcement services to be provided by COUNTY and furnished to CITY hereunder shall include: A. Enforcement of state statutes; B. Enforcement of ordinances of CITY of the type customarily enforced by the Sheriff vithin the unincorporated territory of the County; C. Traffic enforcement, vith the exception of such traffic enforcement as may be provided by the California Highray Patrol on the freeray traversing D. Detective, juvenile, and other specialized services such as arson, homicide, and narcotics enforcement; E. Attendance at meetings of the City Counsel of CITY and such other meetings of commissions or boards of CITY as CITY may specify. Services to be provided by COUNTY shall include Sheriff*s personnel and automobiles as specified in Schedule 'A' for lay enforcement services. Those personnel and automobiles are to be assigned at the discretion of the Sheriff based on the needs of the community. The services to be provided by COUNTY hereunder shall also include all equipment (including repairs thereto or depreciation thereon), supplies, communications, administration, labor, vacation, and sick leave, any COUNTY retirement contributions, gasoline, oil, and traveling expenses and all other services, obligations or expenditures necessary or incidental to the psrformance of the duties to be performed by Sheriff under the terms of this agreement. There shall be no reduction in COUNTY compensation under this agreement for normal dovntime of vehicles. In all instances vhere special supplies, stationary, notices, forms, and the like ere to be issued in the name of CITY and approved by the Sheriff, the same shall bs supplied by CITY its ovn cost and expense. Nothing in this contract is intended to alter the effect of any statute or COUNTY ordinance related to fees for housing of inmates detained for CITY ordinance violations or for criminal Justice administrative fees (Government Code Section 29550, et seq., San Bernardino County Code Section 16.027A). The CITY rill be separately billed for those items. In consideration for COUNTY'S furnishing and performance of all the services provided for herein, CITY shall pay to COUNTY, upon contract approval, the sum as per Schedule ~A,s artschad p~r year, payable in monthly installments at the beginning of each calendar month during the period of this agreement. Payments shall be due by the fifth day of each month for that same month's services. Payments received after sixty (60) days of vhan due shall include simple interest after the 60th day against the amount oving, calculated at the COUNTYtS then curr~nt investment pool rate. Said sum is subject to adjustment for any salary increases or fringe benefits vhich may be granted by the Board of Supervisors to Sheriffts employees. The actual cost of overtime, court appearances, and travel expenses rill be billed quarterly. PAGB 2 of 6 COUNTY shall have the riZht to renegotiate the rate for services performed under O this agreement at the end of each fiscal year, and said rate may be adjusted upward or downward to reflect the actual cost. CITY is responsible for the validity of its ordinances, including any ordinances or codes incorporated by reference in CITY'S ordinances, and CITY shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify COUNTY, its officers and employees with respect to any lawsuit or actionschallenging the validity of a CITY ordinance or with respect to any allegation that any arrest, citation, or other action taken by COUNTY, its officers or employees was taken under an invalid CITY ordinance, except in those cases where the invalidity of such ordinance is the result of actions by the Sheriff's Department. Otherwise than is stated in this aZreement, CITY shall not be obliged to pay, and assumes no liability for any cost, expenditure, charge, or liability whatsoever incurred by COUNTY in or related to the performance of the provisions of this agreement by COUNTY, and COUNTY shall, in consideration for the payment of the sums herein above provided to be paid by CITY to COUNTY, hold CITY harmless from any and all such costs, expenditures, charges, or liabilities except as otherwise provided in this agreement. CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any COt~qTY employee for injury or sickness arising out of his or her employment while engaZed in the performance of this agreement by COUNTY. CITY shall hold COUNTY harmless for a reduction in law enforcement services resultin~ from labor relation actions and CITY'S obligation to pay COUNTY shall be reduced for services not performed for that reason. V. The term of this contract shall be a period of time commencing on Januar~y Z, 1994, and terminatin2 only as hereinafter provided. This a~reement may be terminated at any time with or without cause by CITY or by COUNTY upon written notice given to the other at least one (1) year before the date specified for such termination. Any such termination date shall coincide with the end of a calendar month. In the event of such termination, each party shall fully pay and discharge all obligations in favor of the other accruing prior to the date of such termination and each party shall be released from all obligations or performance which would otherwise accrue subsequent to the date of such termination. In the event of termination of this aZreement, the COUNTY shall refund any sum previously paid by CITY, which when prorated represents advance payment for months of service which are not performed as a result of such termination. Neither party shall incur any liability to the other by reason of such termination. Notwithstandin2 the foregoing, in the event the Sheriff provides any services to CITY on a holdover basis after the date of contract termination, CITY shall fully reimburse cOteFrY for all costs of providir~ such services.. COUNTY shall have the right to terminate this contract if CITY does not make timely payment of its obligations hereunder to COUNTY. PAGB ~ of 6 Any and all notices required to be given hereunder shall be given in writing by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid. The addresses of the parties hereto until further notice are as follows: CITY: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 COUNTY: San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department Bureau of Administration P. O. Box 569 San Bernardino, CA 92402-0569 VI. The standards of performance, the methods of performance, the discipline of officers, the control of personnel, the advancement in compensation of personnel, the determination of proper law enforcement practices and procedures, and all other matters incidental to the manner of performance of services by Sheriff hereunder shall be determined by the Sheriff at his sole discretion. The responsibility of Sheriff and of COUNTY to CITY hereunder shall be to provide, as an independent contracting agency, effective lay enforcement of the level herein contracted for, and the CITY shall not have the right to determine or direct the manner or means of the performance. VII. All persons directly or indirectly employed by cOb~rrY in the performance of the services and functions to be provided to CITY hereunder, shall be employees of COUNTY, and no COUNTY employees shall have CITY pension, civil service, or other status or right. Notvithstandiag the foregofag, and in order to give official status to the performance of duties by Sheriff's personnel hereunder, avery Sheriff's officer or employee engaged in performfag any such service or function shall be deemed to be an officer of CITY while performfag service for CITY within the scope of this agreement, and such service function shall be a municipal function. An arrest made by Sheriff's personnel while engaged in the performance of this agreement shall constitute an arrest by an officer employed by CITY, and not an arrest by COUNTY officer, within the meaning of Section 1463 of the Penal Code and any similar or related statute. VIII. CITY shall have the right at any time and from time to time during the term of this agreement to request a higher level of law enforcement than that herein contracted for, and within a reasonable time after such requests, COUNTY shall provide such additional personnel and vehicles as may be required to provide such additional law enforcement. PACE 4 of 6 In such event~ all provisions of this aKreement vith respect to compensation to paid by CITY sh~ll remain in full force and effect, but in addition to payment of the sums herein provided, CITY shall pay COUNTY in monthly installments the cost of such additional lay enforcement service. IX. In the event of riot, civil commotion, or other emergency in the CITY vhich requires additional emergency or "back-up" service, COUNTY shall provide the same. In the event of authorized public gatherings in the CITY requiring additional police services, salaries sad related costs shall be borne by CITY, except vhere such authorized public gatherings occur on state or federal property vithin the CITY limits, such additional costs shall not be chargeable against the CITY. Not included in riots or related services are salaries or related costs of additions1 police services for authorized public gatherings. In the event of such an emergency outside of the corporate limits of CITY, personnel or equipment assiZned by Sheriff to the performance of COUNTY'S duties hereunder may be utilized by COLq~I~ in connection vith such emerZency, hovevet no more than fifty percent (50~) of available personnel end equipment may be mssiKned outside the CITY boundaries vithout the mutual agreement of the Sheriff and the City mAnnKer. In the event of a major emerZancy in the CITY sad surroundinK communities, Sheriff's personnel and equipment shall not be essiZned outside the CITY boundaries at a level vhich vould deter from the CITY'S ability to respond to the existing emergency. In cases vhere the City NannKer or his or her desiZnee cannot be consulted prior to such deployment, such advisement must be to the City Nanager's Office immediately or as soon as possible thereafter. In case the City Nan~er must be personally informed of the situation immediately or as soon as possible thereafter. The CITY shall be reimbursed for any resultant service not performed. X. To facilitate the perfor-mnce of services hereunder by COUNTY, CITY~ its officers, nKents~ sad employemm shall give their full cooporation sad assistance vithin the scope of the duties and responsibilities of such officers, nKsats, sad employees. CITY shall hold COUNTY~ its Sheriff, officers, and employeesharmless from any sad all liability for intmmtior, al acts or negligence on the part of CITY, its officers and employees (excludinK an,/employees of COUNTY en~nKed in the perfornnce of municipal duties hereunder) sxisiq out Of-6~Lq~]m~Y~ the performance of this contract. Sheriff shall be desiZnated an the Chief of Police of CITY at all times during the term of this nKreement. Said Sheriff shall designate a station commander to york directly vith and provide liaison vith the City Hanager and other CITY officers of the CITY. The Sheriff's commander shall make regular monthly reports to the City Hanager, and such other reports as may be appropriate as determined by the Sheriff, vith respect to enforcement vithin the corporate limits of CITY. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO s- CII'~ OF E&NCBO CUC&IIOBGA Chairman, Board of Supervisors .... (State if corl3orarion, comicany, etc.) Dated By I- (Aurhorize~ Signature) SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS Dated DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. Title. Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino. Address 10500 CIviC ~ D~I. vl5 By ~ CEC,~3IO!iGA, CA 91730 :pro~ Form ~ Reviewed as to Affirmative Action Reviewed for Processing County Counsel Agency Administrstor/CAO o.,. ! o.t. o.,. SCHEDULE A LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 93/94 FY 93/94 SERVICE COST* 6 - 168 Hour General Law Patrol Units $2,756,646'* 4 - 80 Hour General Law Patrol Units (2 units w/radar) 898,426** 5 - 56 Hour General Law Patrol Units 805,024** 5 - 40 Hour General Law Patrol Units (2 units w/radar) 569,897** 5 - 40 Hour Traffic Patrol Motorcycles With Radar 550,885** 4 - 40 Hour K-9 Unit 104,698'* 8 - 40 Hour Detective Units 950,209** MENU ITEMS 109 073** i - Captain with unit ' 3 - Community Services Officers 121,461 2 - Forensic Specialist II 144,892 3 - Sheriff's Service Specialists 196,284 i - Public Information Clerk 27,921 3 - Senior Deputy Differential 17,814 i - Deputy II DARE Officer 67,570 1 - Research Analyst 44,000 i - Secretary II Differential 3,880 1 - Secretary I Differential 1,511 I - Supervising Station Clerk Differential 3,319 I - Station Clerk 33,097 I - Marked Unit 8,187.* 5 - Unmarked Units 32,695** i - Mid-Size Pickup Truck 8,458** 2 - Marked Mini-Vans (DARE van insurance only) 8,057** i - Marked 4X4 10,114'* Services and Supplies Credit (80,108) 10,269 CAD/CLETS/RMS County Direct Cost 217,581 Start-Up Cost Vehicles and Employees 11,164 POSITION CREDITS Lieutenant - .35 Credit (32,852) Sergeant - .07 Credit (5,773) Station Clerk - .10 Credit ( 3,310) Motorpool Services Assistant - .60 Credit (20 845) TOTAL DIRECT COSTS AJt~ THOSE COSTS ASSESSED TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BY THE COUNTY FOR: Personnel Liability Insurance - $108,431 Personnel Bonding Fee - $ 815 Vehicle Insurance Fee - $108,335 MONTHLY PAYMENT SCHEDULE: 1st payment due the 15th of July - $632,374 2nd through 12th payment due the 5th of each month - $632,370 (07/01/93) PAGE i of 3 SCHEDULE A LAW ENFORCweMHNT SERVICE CONTRACT CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA FY 93/94 City will be billed on a quarterly basis for: Actual Overtime Cost: Overtime and court appearances estimated for FY 93/94 is $217,000. Professional Services From Private Vendors. Services and Supplies. Fuel and Maintenance (if applicable). K-9 Charges: Cost for food, medical expenses, etc. · Subject to change due to salary and benefit changes or Board of Supervisors action. · * Less Fuel and Maintenance. City is responsible for fuel and maintenance of all contract vehicles. Maintenance is defined as all routine maintenance, all necessary repairs (mechanical or body repair), and replacement of any destroyed vehicle. If vehicle damage is eligible for coverage under County insurance policies, a claim will be filed with County Risk Management. Any money reimbursed by Risk Management will be credited to the City's account to offset City costs. (07/01/93) PAGE 2 of 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~ONGA LAW ENFORCEHENT CONTRACT FY 93/94 SAFETY GENERAL i CAPTAIN 2 - FORENSIC II 2 - LIEUTENANTS 3 - SHERIFF'S SERVICE SPECIALISTS 10 - SERGEANTS 1 - RESEARCH ANALYST 12 - DEPUTY III'S I - SECRETARY II 55 - DEPUTY II'S I SECRETARY I 3 - COMMUNITY SERVICES OFFICERS 8~ 1 - SUPERVISING STATION CLERK 12 - STATION CLERKS I - AUTOMOTIVE ASSISTANT i - PUBLIC INFORMATION CLERK 10.45 - DISPATCHERS VEHICLES EQUIPMENT 22 - MARKED PATROL UNITS 4 - RADAR GUNS (includes K-9) 14 - UNMARKED UNITS i - DARE'VAN 1 - 4X4 i - MID-SIZE PICKUP TRUCK 5 - MOTORCYCLES I - MINX VAN (07/01/93) PAGE 3 OF 3 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'l FROM: FLOY0 TtOWELL, Shertff SUBJECT: LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT RECOMMENDATION: Effective july 1, 1985: 1. Approve revised contract to provide ~tnor word changes and increased law enforcement service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga- 2. Approve addition of three (3) Deputy Sheriff II positions, with concurrent classification. 3. Approve addition of two (2) Transcriber Typist II positions, with concurrent classification. 4. Approve addttion of one (1) Public Infon~ation Clerk position, with concurrent classificatto~- S. Approve addtttOn Of three (3) fully equipped (two with radar) marked patrol vehicles. 6. Authorize the County Administrative Officer to tnclud~ appropriation and revenue tn the 1985/86 budget to ,~f]ect f!~e above acttons- REASON FOR RECOMg~NOATION: Revtsto~ of the current contract was required because of mtnor word change tn Articl:-s II ~nd IlI. The revised contract, wtth effective date of July 1, 1985, replaces the current contract (83-819) and establishes the FY 1985/86 fee schedule for the City and reimbursement to the County. ~s permitted under Article VIII of the contract, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is requesting a higher level of setvie for FY 85/86. The requested ]eve] nf service requires three (3) addtttora] Deputy IIs, two (2) Tra~scriber Typist [IS, one (1) Public Information Clerk, and three (3) fully equipped markpd patrol untts ~o handle the 1noreased workload. Ac~so~ of the Board of GuOerwsors XGREEI'S~I~ ~O. 85-596 ApPROVED BOARD ~cr v/a~'T~'E'" COUNTY OF SAN BER rers~,~el (3) MOTION Seem_ ~ t~h[c]~ SerfIcesT O I 2 3 4 5 C*'O°CE~[tn MARTH ~ SEKERAK. C ERK OF ~HE~DA~O , I~"ZDIMi~I40THERD~PARTHENTS: The contract has ~een spproved as to fom by Ronald 7. Rettz, Deputy County Cownsel, and posttton classifications have been r~vtet~l by the personnel Department. FZNANCZAL DATA: No additional net cost to ~he County. 3*UT.,Y 22, 1985 /:T]~"~f -q~ 210 SCHEDULE wA' RATES LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICE CONTRACT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 1985-86 FY 1985-86 COST _ SERVIC~ 5 - 168 Hour General Law patrol Units $ 1,380,665 el 198,69~ ee 1 - 112 Hour General Law Patrol Units 269,856 2 - 80 Hour General Law patrol Units 203,775 ea q - hO Hour Genera1 Law Patrol Unlts 2 - 80 Hour Traffio Patrol Units (with radar) 270,758 ea ~ - ~0 Hour Trafflo patrol Units (wlth radar) 273,50~ ea 360,q85 ss 5 - hO Hour Detective Units 69,q~0 sa Captain and Car 5,656 Sergeant's Marked Unit ~e735 ee Additional Unmarked Unit 6,~29 ee Marked ~-Wheel Drive patrol Unit 38,296 Deputy I (1) 112,650 Radio Dispatchers (5) 11,631 Senior Deputy Differential (3) 2~,621 Secretary II (1) 999 Secretary I Differential (1) 16,807 Extra Help Safety (3/~) Transcriber Typist II (2) a,O00 Travel Expense 59 County Direct Cost TOTAL $ County Direct Cost are those costs Monthly payment Schedule:. assessed to the Sheriff's Department by the County for: _ personnel Liability Insurance Fee 1st payment Due July 15th. personnel BopdicK Fee Vehicle Insurance Fee 2nd through 12th payment Due 5th of Each Month ADDITIONAL CMARGES ~I_LLED QUARTERLY: · Overtime: Overtime and court appearances estimate for FY 85-86 is JJOc Actual overtime will be billed quarterly- V~hiclp M~*"~c?: Estimated main~enance cost based on 936,~C0 p~r mile is ~J2,320. Actual cost will be billed quarterly- K-9 Charges: Cost for food, medic~l pxpense and ere., will be ~uart~r{Y. · Propo~d, subject to change du~ to M~morandum of Understandin~ ex tss~ F~)~ ~Cd H~lnt~nance (RCSCDA) R~vis~d 06/26/85 FOR eO~fi' UI~ ONLY COUNTyOiIiAiiiINIARINNO STANDARD CONTRACT '~ 401 9646 00l $ 3,378, THIS CONTRACT I$ eftteNd into In the Stete of C~lfomls b~ and between ~e County of San Bemafdlno, hemo called the County, lad CITY OF RANCliO CUCANQI¢RA he~ftercalted CITY P.0...BOx 807 Rancho Cucamng8, Call'formic 91730 f~ ~rfom~e K 1~ efore~t 8ervZee8 vtthLn t~ terrl~rtal ~darles of Ci~, C~n~F shell pro~de, thr~ the S~rSff K C~nt~ (~eina~ter referr~ ~ es ~Nrtff*), le ~r~eet sithie ~he e~orete li~ts K CltF es see ~ elis~, ~ es ~ ~irid by ennexeti~ ~ ezelusi~ dur~.nS t~ te or this slr~nt. TT. T~ 1~ enforcer s~vteee ~ ~ p~vtd~ furnished ~o CIty hereu~er shall tnelude: A. gnfere~ of s~e~e g. Enforemnt of ~dlnaneee o~ Clty K the ty~ ~fore~ by the ~rtff viihie ~he untneo~et~ terrtt~ of the ? C. Puttee prOtee%loS of the type euetaeoPtly leonideal 3 4 D. ~efflo mf~nt, ~th ~ gZ~ Petal ~ ~. fr~ ~eerllnl CIty; 10 ~. ltt~,~e ot ~ti~ ~ ~ City ~il ~ City n ~ ~ o%~ ~t'~ ~ iramime w mm ~ City mm ~s~rtly ~vZd~ ~ S~tff wilts tM ~l~m~ ,- 17 m~m of t~ briffes ~mml ~ m~tlu u ~ifi~ is 21 5~le elm r~ z~ ero~t ~VSMI, ~ ebileo are ~ ~ Isaiah at tM dl~reti~ ~ the Shetff bm ~ %~ n~s ~ the 23 ~ ~rviem9 to b pro~d~ ~ C~ty br~er shill also include mIX ~uip~% (i~ludln~ rmlr8 ~ depreeisti~ %her~n), ~Ites. e~ini~a~i~s, Ps~ 2 of ,'~ insideeta1 tO the Nrrormnee of the ~tiee tO ~ performal ~ 5 ~ ~ r~ttoe In C~ty WRestlea u~der this 10 s~ il Zn omStd~stte fW C~*s ~i~l~ 13 prf~ ~ eft' tb mr~ee. ~m tw ~u~ .City 14 16 First" p~t m~lZ M ~ ~ ~Zy 15, I~, ~ rmiai~ eZe~ 11 whiele ~el ssiqtesMe ~ trswel ~as in~rr~ beW~ J~ly 1 ~ .. ~ June 30 ~ll be ~tll~ quarterly. ~ C~nty shell he, the ri~t to r~oti8~ tM rate J H for servi'el ,rro~d ~der this eRrsswat et the ~ or ~ each riseat year. m~ said rate m~ be ,dJust~ uWe~ ~ d~Nsrd to ratlet the Ktuel east. Page 2 of 9 2 oedin~eeem. te~iudlnl any ordinals ~ e~es 3 ~ ~re~ In Cttyeo ~te~eeo, sod City e~ol2 det~, 4 I iRUlId City ~iW~, Ot~t iS ~ II ~m ~ IS ~ IS ~iS O~. CIty ~11 14 ~ld~ ~ b Mid in City, MId Ci~ M~OM 21 i~tty to my C~ety 'elan r~ in~ elates ~ ~ his ~lmt ~ile ep~ to the 23 Cl~v shall hold C~ntv harmless r~ · ~etion in ~r~et services rssu]~[nf fro li~r rels~l~8 ~ttons o~ Cityel Oblf~tl~ ~ p~ C~n~y shall be services so~ perrOr~d fop that 2 The tess of t~ls ee~tr~e~ shell be s period of tie ? eSKhty days (lqO) ~roff ~ da~e apeelfiN I %mrminm~io~. A~ Su~ tmrminmtt~ dmtm shell ootnetdm vith ~ the end ~ m calendar ~th. Tn the tO ~ermlnstton. each p,~y shsl~ ~lly pay sad discherR; l! obituaries In rwv~ ~ t~ o~ ~e~leg prt~ 12 d,t, of such t~ml~stt~ ~ pseW psr~.y shell M r~l~ssod 13 fr~ slZ obligs~t~s ~ ~rforms,, ~t~ w~ld 14 aecru~ subs~uent to tht dstp of ~ twrMnmti~. Tn the !~ even~ or te~lns~lm ~ this sl~t. t~ C~ty shall 18 refund ~ sum prevt~sly ~ld ~ City. ~ieW ~en proPwiN.. 17 r~Dresents ~va,, p~t f~ ~th8 or servl~ !l no~ ~rfo~d ess ~sult or sue~ ter~r~tt~. Neither 19 party shall tear any liability to t~ o~ ~ rees~ of 2t A~ ~..~11 ~tlees requlred to ~ Rlvee shall ~ ~m In writiq ~ relieter~ ~ ~lfl~ at1, ~ ~rth~ nott, ere so foils: ~5 Cl~: ~rof ~nceo Cuce~ga post Offfce ~ 807 RancM C~a~a. ~ 917~ ~uw~: ~IN of Su~ntsors ~mCy ~e~t ~ter ~ ~ N, ASide St8 F]~r ~n k~l~tWO. ~ pesosceil, tlw edvmmen~t. te ·eatenties 4 preeodurem. and ell of!He rotere Incidental to 'Jw mime' of perforas~ee of eervlemm ty Sisrift hereerier WIt be 7 determined by Sheriff in him eelm dtseretlee. The ree~4emtbiZtty of Ilmfl. rf end of Ceuety to CIty lefemdes, shell t1 to m~dm. me m tnda~de~t sentrieSill measly, erreetive lmf ~erefmme% of the leNl Mrele seatreeled l! roe.. me the City well sot IMse Us f!ll~ to deemmine w dl~let, m IBmmr Ir Beeel et gle pElfme ' · .. . · I~ovtded to City hererefer, allell te mlployeee of Comity**' · foreloi~l, 'BM Is orde to live offtold ststdm to the 21 of rises or employee eRpled In pm'foellel ., eft,/ eueh service m* f~eetloe ·hall IM 4eemed to be me 2f office,' of City v~ile mePt'oPwiRI lePvlee 24the seq)e of t. hl · lilreeme~t, aed sud~ metflee ruwetto~ ~hsl l I~ · wmlelpll rimeties, ,~.~ 24 As erreat mmdo by .41heriff*m pmr~oeeml vhtle eelsfed te ~ 27 the perrom·Ree ef thl· DIProt shell eemltituto 217 3 Poem% Code ed eey stutter ee fitaid eta%ate, I end vitals · peasenate tim sf~er ~ rOses%J, County 9 WX~ e~o~de eedl eddttteeel Feesmeet eed oh%oleo I0 - It roeFeet to eeml4eeettee to 14 reid tr City eheZl rebate im '. 13 eumo berets presided, City dill PUF 14 instsllm~ts tlw east of mm~ addtrial lie earcrescent It l:lo 17 le tW~ e~mt of riot, et~t commotion, ee etlmr IS eeqeee/iu the Citl ~ie~ reedram eddttiml ee C ~6 public latheriRis in t~e 21 City pC%riM Nettleeel putlee meretees, eelsrime mad 22 rpiatimd coats shml% be barBs I~y City, 23 authorized Weblie pittteSs occur oe State or Federal 24 proStrt. y viibin tl~@ City limits. su~ eddttto~al costs ehmll not be ehorlmablo a!at~st tM City. 26 Woe. included in riots er rollted services Ire salaries ' 218 or rfiated ~.netl of additional puttee marytees ? '& ... personnel or equipleeS Mallned by -qheriff to the 4 performsMe of Ceuntyws duties hereeerier, me be u iXited 6 ehmZX be reimbursed rot tony ree*-lgmt settles ? perterred, I0 Crusty, City, its offleers, slm~s, ewe espieStea shall 11 live their i~ll eeee4rstione and suetstease within the t2 8oWe of ~be duties ad respensi~ilities of ne~ oftleers, ~ . ,~.- .. D siesta. ~ mplm, eelsyews bursless f~m my ' end ell liability rap la~entio~el lots or eellilies ml the pePS e~. CitlN its errsews sad employs (-e~l~dinl ----~ eelsyews of County 17 e~..lnled iu tM peaaPe=nee of stoleSpsi duties Iw~emul~ I$ iriuille out of tits pePfoessuee of this sSmll be desllne*.ed ee the Clde.~ of Pols.6e of 21 City et ell time duties the te~ or U~le siressent. 38id Sheriff shell W~otnt m deputy ~P ~.ficeF 23 Ns~if~ed to eoPk directly wit.~ sad provide ~imisoe witl~ the 2~ City M~n~P s~d othe~ C~cy officers o~ ~he City. The .~irf*s Deputy shell r. ke ~efulsP sonthly ~eWo~s ~o City N~R!e.P,' ~ sue!~ other reports ss may ~ sl)propriste ss determined b? the ,eh~.rirr, with respect to lee enterceaseS within t~,~ eorl~ste listts or city. T,,. ..,---., r,..~.,.. ,.. prior .,r......, betveen the perttee uhJoh prior elreeaent shslZ termShere upon the efre~Zve de~,e or thee elree~en%. Memorandum City Manager's Office To: Mayor, City Council From: Jack Lain, City~ Date: February 14, 1994 Subject: Booking Fee Settlement and Law Enforcement Contract The City has been informed that the County has not signed the Settlement Agreement and ifs fate may be implicated in the County's current labor negotiations with the Sheriffs Employees Benefit Association, (SEBA). Counsel to the contract cities has advised that our contract cities should take no action on these documents until the County has executed the Settlement Agreement. Since the Settlement Agreement and the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract are a package deal, staff agrees with our legal counsel not to take action on any of the documents presented to the City Council for Wednesday's Council meeting. Please contact me should you have any questions. attachments: Lefter from William J. Brunick and attachments BRUNICK, ALVAREZ & BATTERSBY CiTV0 RE.C!V ~. ~ MEMORANDUM DATE: February 4, 1994 TO: All San Bernardino County Contract Cities FROM: William J. Brunick RE: City of Adelanto, etal. v. County of San Bernardino Case No. 262309 City of Victorville, etal. v. County of San Bernardino Case No. 262162 Ladies and Gentlemen: The purpose of this memorandum is to update and discuss the above-referenced matters. As you probably know, the County did not sign the Settlement Agreement in the booking fees case. Enclosed herewith please find a copy of a letter dated February 1, 1994, from Harry Mays to Sam Racadio. For those cities that have already forwarded a fully-executed Settlement-Agreement and the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract to the County, please be advised that you will not be bound by the terms of the amended contract and that the County will continue to operate and perform its law enforcement functions pursuant to the existing contract. Enclosed herewith please find a copy Of a letter dated February 4, 1994, from this Office to County Counsel. For those cities that have already signed the Settlement Agreement and the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract, but have not yet mailed these documents to the County, it is recommended that you hold on to these agreements until the County has signed the Settlement Agreement. For those cities that have not signed the Settlement Agreement end theAmended Law Enforcement Service Contract, it is recommended that no action be taken on these agreements until the County has executed the Settlement Agreement. As always, we will continue to keep you abreast of the ongoing status of these matters. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO County Admlnbl~tive Office~,~a · FEB 0 199 L.. Februa~ 1, 1994 Mr. Sam Raceclio, Ci~ Manager Ci of Hi bland 2~S E. ~aseline venue A Highland, Californi~ 923~ Dear Sam: AS you are aware, the contra~ cites and the County of San Bernardtrio are close to reaching agreement on the resolution of ~e bookin ee lawsuit and the signing of a new contra~ d~ law enforcement contra~. Un~o~unately. due to the current labor discussions be~een the 5heriH's Em Ioye~ Benefit Ass~iation ($EBA) and the County of $an Bernardtrio and the poBiff · ~mpa~ on fundin . semite levels and co~ to the coun~ and contra~ cities. the C~un~ of San Bernar~no mu~ po~pone any fu~her law enforcement contrad discuss'ons forthe present. I will keep you advised as labor negotia~ons proceed regarding possible impam you r ci~. Sil re , H~~~AYS Coun~ Adminis~ra~3ve Officer HMM:des Post-it' br.nd (Bx trensmittal memo 7671 BRUNICK, ALVAREZ t~ BATTERSBY · ,,.,,,'~o~ Q. ~.-c...,.-,~ February 4, 1994 VIA FAX AND MAIL Susan A. Hopkins, Deputy County Counsel San Bernardino County Counsel 385 N. Arrowhead Ave. Sen Bernardino, CA 92415-0140 Re: City of Adelanto. et el. v. County of San Bernardino Case No. 262309 City of Victorville, et el. v. County of San Bernardin~ Case No. 262162 Dear Sue: The purpose Of this letter is to confirm Our telephone conversation of February 3, 1994, regarding possible settlement of the booking fees case. In this regard, you advised me that the County's Board of Supervisors did not sign the Settlement Agreement which you and I had prepared due to its perceived effect on the County's current labor negotiations with the Sheriff's Employees Benefit Association. As such, you and Z agreed ~hat the Settlement Agreement and the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract were a package deal and=hat any City that has already signed both agreements would not be bound by the terms of the Amended Law Enforcement Service Contract until the County signed the Settlement Agreement. You further advised me that the County would continue to operate and perform under the existing law enforcement service contracts. Thank you for the professional courtesy and cooperation you have shown throughout this case. Very truly yours, BRUNICK, ALVAREZ & BATTERSBY ~Ke~nnedl~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,f~ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane William~, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember City Council Mobile Home Subcommittee SUB JEff: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION OF TBE MOBILE HOME INITIATIVE Approve the attached Resolution in opposition of the Mobile Home Initiative. The City's Mobile Home Accord was established by the City Council as a rent stabilization document. The Accord's term is from February 6, 1992 through February 5, 1997. The current Mobile Home Initiative (Exhibit A) may invalidate existing mobilehome rent control laws and limit existing local mobilehome rent control laws if it is suocessfully passed. With the full City councirs adoption of the attached Resolution, our City will be on record as formally opposing this effort to remove local control of rents within our mobile home parks. Respectfully Submitted, ~ ? / Diane William.~ Rex ~3utiermz Attachment: Mobile Home Initiative (Exhibit A) MOBILE ROME INITIATIVE ~XRIBIT "A" INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMI'rr~D DIRECTLY TO TIlE VOTERS The Attorney Genernl of California has prepared the following title and summary of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: MOBILEHOME RENT ASSISTANCF. MOBILEHOME RENT CONTROL RESTRICTIONS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Requires mobilehome park management to administer and provide rent subsidy equal to ten percent discount on monthly rent to tenants meeting residehey and income requirements, when ten percent or less of occupied spaces are covered by rent control or rent subsidy. Establishes priorifins for, nnd Conditions for losing rent subsidy. Invalidates existing, nnd prohibits new, state mobilehome rent control laws. Limits existing, and prohibits new, local mobilehome rent control laws. Prohibits such laws from requiting reductions in rent nnd limiting increases in rent to less than specified cost of living index. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analys~ nnd Dirertot of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: No impact on · state costs or revenues. In the near term, cities nnd counties may experience increased costs which are unkno,'n, but are not likely to total more than millions of dollars nnnunlly. In the long term, local agencies would experience savings in the range of millions to tens of millions of dollars annually. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC: THIS PETITION MAY BE CIRCULATED BY A PAID SIGNATURE GATHERER OR A VOLUNTEER. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO ASK. Tbb ~olumn for All signers of Illis petlUon must be reglstttzd In County. official use only. L ptinl your Name: R~sjdtn~ A~ldret. s ONLY: Signalire u Regtstt~:d: City 7jp L print Your NIm~ Ro~iden~t Address ONLY: jigharm u hFsl~tt City Zip l, print Your Nant: ~ Addt~tl ONLY: Si~u.,e H R~gisl~d; City Zip ;iFlalm~ as hgiW, tUt: City Zip ;igllltu~ al h~ City Zip " Stinttins M geligutt ciZy Zip SiF u R~ Cily Zip I. am rcgistcred to vote in the County (or City and County) of y restdeuce address is ! circulated this section of the petition and saw each of the appended signatures being written. Each siplure on this petition is to the best of my information and belief, the genuine signature of the.person wliose nameit ... .l~orts to be. All signatures on this document were obtained between the dates of and ... .: . ;~dec~t~unde~pena~ty~f~duryundertbe~ws~f~h~t~fCa~if~roi~t~g~y~is~u~a~c~t~w~' 19 at · INITIATIVE MEASURE TO BE SUBMI]TED DIRECTLY TO THE VOTERS The ~ttorney General of California has prepared the following title and summary. of the chief purpose and points of the proposed measure: MOBILEHOME RENT ASSISTANCE. MOBILEHOME RENT CONTROL RESTRICTIONS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Requires mobilehome park management to administer and provide rent subsidy equal to ten percent discount on monthly rent to tenants meeting residency and Income requirements, when ten percent or less of occupied spaces are coverod by rent control or rent subsidy. Establishes priorities for, and conditions for losing rent subsidy. Invalidates existing, and prohibits new, state mobilehome rent control laws. Limits existing, and prohibits new, local mobilehome rent control laws. Prohibits such laws from requiring reductions in rent and limiting increases in rent to less thnn specified cost of living index. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local governments: No impact on state costs or revenues. !n the near term, cities and counties may experience increased costs which are unknmvn, but are not likely to total more than millions of dollars annually. In the long term, local agencies would experience savings In the range of mililons to tens of millions of dollare annually. To the Honorabl~ Secretary of State of California: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,,~ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 20, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Diane O~cal, Management Analyst H SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPOINT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE HISTORIC CULTURAL RESOURCE MITIGATION TASK FORCE The Historic Preservation Commission generated the attached memo dated March 24, 1994 stating that the Historic Cultural Resource Mitigation Task Force has been reconvencd and they arc asking that a City Council representative be selected to serve on the Task Force. The City Council representative would replace former Councilmember Pam Wright. The purpose of the Task Force is to formulate standard procedures for the mitigation of adverse impacts to identified cultural or historic resources. As indicated in the attached memo, Commissioners Peter Tolstoy and John Melcher will serve as Historic Preservation Commission members and it is anticipated the Task Force will complete its goal within three to six months. RcSpeg. ffully Submitted, Analyst H Attachment: Historic Preservation Commission Memo Dated March 24, 1994 'CITY OF RANCHO CUCh,AONGA MEMORANDUM DA'r~: March 24, 1994 TO: Mayor and Members of the city council FROM: E. David Barker, Historic preservation Comission Chairman SUBJECT: HISTORIC CULTURAL RESOURCE MITIGATION PROGRAM Back in October 1991, the city council directed then Council Member Pain Wright to work with the Historic preserve=ion Commission on a standerd procedure for the mitigation of adverse impacts to identified cultural or historic resources. However, with the departure of Pam Wright and the later departure of the two designated Historic preservation Co~i~issioners, Marsha Banks and Steve Preston, this task was tabled until recently. It was during the commission's recent discussion on the Norton/Fisher house that this matter was raised again by the Co~ission. The Historic preservation Comission hal now reestablished a Conciseion task force to formulate standard procedures for the mitigation of adverse impacts to identified cultural and historic resources- Therefore, we would request that the City Council appoint a Council representative to this task force to replace Pam Wright. Co~niseioners Peter Tolstoy and John Melcher have agreed to serve on this task force. It is anticipated that the task force could complete their ~ntended goal within three to six months. Thank you for your Consideration of this request and please advise if any Council Members can participate in this endeavor which we consider to be very worthwhile. EDB:gS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM TO: Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~C FROM: , Will iam J. O'Neil City Engin SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS C-18 A OUNCIL AGENDA APRIL 20, 1994 We wish to request the following action be taken on the subject Consent Calendar items on the April 20, 1994 meeting. Item C-18 - Award of contract for the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station Request this item be postponed for two weeks to fianlize the property acquisition with the property owner General Dynamics. Item C-20 - Award of contract for the Coating of the Traffic Deck/Parking Structure at City Hall - We request the staff recommendation for this item be changed to reject all bids and authorize readvertising of the project. This item should be readvertised because there was bidder confusion related to the appropriate state license to be used for the work. WJO:dlw - P.O. BOX 669 · SAN DIMAS, CA 91773 Bus.: (818) 339-7351 · (714) 592-1900 ~-~ FivE,. Contr. State Lic. No.: 349419 "F" Attn: Joe O'NeiJ, City Engineer The City oI Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 808 Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 Re: Bid tot Resurtaclng oi Traific Deck/Parking Structure, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, bid 3/22/94. Dear Mr, O'Neil: AIter spearing with Llnda Beaker on 4/14/9~, I was iniorsed that Consolidated WaterprooIlng, Inc. had lost the above Job due to a technicality, Improper license. She stated that we did not have a C~32 or "A" license, which the bid required. As I explained to bet, I had contacted the CallIornia Contractors State License Board and I was told that our license and classification does qualily us to do the work required. BeIore I bid the project, I contacted Monte Preacher, Public Works Engineer Ior t~e CIty oI Ranthe Cucamonga, and I explained that the sPeclIlcatlona called Ior an "A' license or a license. I explained to him that my license, C-15, C-61/D12, was quaillied to do this project. UnIortunately# he did not agree. But having contacted the LIcense Board and being told that our license was acceptable to periorm the work that was required In the proposal by the CIty, we submitted our bid to the city anyway. The reading oI the bids was attended by our secretary. Our bid was the lowest at ~138,809.00. The second lowest was Ladnet Coatings at $169,365.00, a dliIerence oE $30,566.00. Since my conversation with Llnda, I requested that Nancy Brown~ PreSident Consolidated WaterproofinE, lnc., again contact the LIcense Board in an attempt to obtain a written letter stating that our license was qualliled to do the work required. She spore to Dale Stewart# a Classification Deputy, and he confirmed that our license was more than qualliled to do this Job; however, hb was unable to send' a letter since he was eight weeks behind In writing letters. He did state that he would be more than willing to speak with anyone that Inquires about this matter and that he would confirm the above. Mr. Stewart's number Is (916) 2~5-39~0. Installing Subterranean Waterproofing, Elastomenc Roof Deck and Parking Structures and Elas torneric Exterior Traffic Bearing Systems Page 2 of 2 April 18, i894 I would sincerely appreciate If you would contact mr. Stewart at the California State Contractors License Board upon receiving this letter to confirm that our license is qualified to do the work required. I have aiso been told that this matter will be on the consent calendar for approval at the council meeting on 4/20/94, I am requesting that this be postponed or pulled from the calendar so that I can makea formal presentation to the council with my concerns. I am a resident and tax payer in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Consolidated Waterproofing, Inc. has two other employees that are also hoseowners in Rancho Cucamonga. For this reason, I am very concerned with this issue. I cannot understand the Justification that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would pay approximately S30,556.00 more for a job due to a licensing technicality, that I have explained and hopefully clarified. Furthermore, this project was a re- bid. I was told that Ladher Coatings was low bidder at original bid, but the project was re-bid since Ladner's "paperwork" was not acceptable at that time. Has the city made exceptions for Ladner during the first bid? Again, I urge you to reconsider our bid proposal and allow our company an opportunity to do this work. If this is not possible, I recommend that the City allow this project to be re-hid for the thtrd time and allow our classification and other bidders in our classification an opportunity to bid the project. I strongly feel that the City will save more tax dollars, certainly $30,000.00 off the top, if the project is re-bid. Please contact Nancy Brown or myself at your earliest convenience to discuss this matter. I do plan to attend the Council meeting and request the approval be pulled from the consent calendar so that I can make my presentation. hope to hear from you in the near future. Cordially yours, CONSOLIDATED WATERPROOFING, INC. k_~/ ' ~ ,q ] . 27:L:,-- :j-', Rhonda b. Zamarrlp.~ Vice President; Taxpayer and concerned citizen in the City of Rancho Cucamonga cc: Nayor*and City Council 0 CUC_,,d CUCAMONGA The HE~T of Route ~ Te~toq O~ ~ April 20, 1994 MEETING ANNOUNCEMENT Boa rd of D i rec tots DATE: Wednesday, May 11, 1994 TIME: 6:30 p.m. PLACE: Sycamore Inn 8518 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Respectful ly submitted , Execut ive Di rector Thomas Winery Plaza · 7965 Vineyard Avenue Suite F-5 · Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 · Phone (909) 948-9166 I SURPRISING CHOICES AMONG FRIENDLY COMPETITORS ONTARIO, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO San Bernardino skyline at night. [Continued from page 1] needs of ~he ~ure. The $~.8 million, eon~en~ion een~eT, and~hedis~ne~ionof~ compensate for wgafies in ~he weather. eilifies and amendties g6,000-squ~e-[ooL cen~er ~s on 10.6 acres r~e jewel in ~he restored, historic ~is- ~a~gains can be had~ Nex~ door, ~omona is home ~o Lhe ~os Angeles County Fair, a historic annu~fi just noah of the m~fin ai~o~ passenger sion Inn. Another su~sing quality about the event now contained within the spr~wl- teminal. In time for NAFTA, the Inter- There's even a "rebel" organization, Inland Empire is i~ ~eat wealth of spe* ing complex approp~' ately named national Terminal serves a~ving non- stop passengers from south of the border, the Rancho Cncamonga Visitors Bureau, cialty sites and entertainment options. that has set Itself up as an m~epen~ent It'snotHollywoodorFisherman's~arf, Fai~lex. A variety of exhibition build- ings offer ~oups a massive m~imum including Mexico City and Guadalajara, on Aeromexico, United, Alaska and representative of the nowhere San Bet- but there ~ the new California Cites accommodation for 6,000. Adjacent is the Mexicana airlines. The new teminal ~ll nardino area. Capitalizing on the histo~- ;tate Historic Park, a living museum in play a key role in trnnsforming the w~y cal distinction of the old Route 66 ter~- tribute to the area's traditionnl cit~s in- ~'acious Sheraton Suites F~irplex, with the meetings indust~ conside~ Mexico to~--~nning through dese~ are~ like dustry, a splendid and unique site for 247 units and space for 800 ~ttendees. NeedlesandB~towtoSanBem~din~ receptions. There'sC~tlePark,~lledwith Close by, the Pomona Hilltop Suites Ho- ~el & Convention Center serves up to 500 as a viable option. the bureau h~ sponsored special events ~niature golf coupes, game arcades, a All re~ons that share a common in- and shows steeped in nostal~a for a road water slide, and more than 30 other tides n its meeting rooms. terest are bound to have their frictions that is now just a memo~ and a '60s and attractions. R3~ng Waters attains a Also in Pomona, C~d State Polytech- and jealousies. The Inland Empire has a ~le~sion showthatlivesonthroughc~e. more ~and scale, ~th 44 acres of water nic University promotes an a~Tay of con- few, and the causes are not hard to imag- ' spots and madness. The Graber Olive ference and housing choices on itslarge ine. With three major cities vying for Aplanner'schoicesareperhapsunex- House, es~blished in 1894, is a totally campus, while the Kellogg West Confer- meetings business, friendly competition pectedly wide, ~ven the common image ch~ing, yet still working, olive factory, ence Center & Hotel is an independently- exis~amongthe area's CVBs forre~onal of the Inland Empire area as merely an a~n side t~p fora tour. G~swold's Candle- ~n outfit on a hilltop setting within the and state~de ~oups. Ontario has the area to p~s through between L.A. and light Pavilion Dinner Theatre provides university gTounds. airpo~, and a slew of sophisticated hotels the dese~ re~ons. But the local bureaus ~oups with lavish brunch and dinner Claremont is a lushly landscaped up- nearby. San Be~ardino has quick access and properties have worked hard to shows and a series of excmlent comedy scale community close against the moun- ~.~ ,~ ~nd 0n~ of the l~g~st change the clich~s held by colorations and musical productions. For luxurious ~ ns Griswold's is both an ente~finment API,tLL, ~ VISITOR AND CONVENTION BUREAUS Greater Ontario Palm Springs San Bernardino Visitor's and Convention Bureau Visitor's Information Center Visitor's and Convention Bureau 421 N. Euclid Ave. 2781 N. Palm Canyon Dr. 219 N. "E" St. Suite #103 Ontario, CA 91762 Palm Springs, CA 92262 = San Bernardino, CA 92401 (909) 984-2450 · Fax (909) 984-7895 (619) 778-8418 Fax (619) 325-4335 = (909) 889-3980 · Fax (909) 888-5988 Exec. Dir., Sherry Hunter Contact: Howard Jacobs Exec. Dir., Dan Stark Riverside Rancho Cucamonga Palm Springs Convention Center Visitor's Bureau Convention Center 3443 Orange St. Thomas Winery Plaza 277 N. Avenida Caballeros Riverside, CA 92401 7965 Vineyard Ave. Suite #F-5 Palm Springs, CA 92262 (909) 787-7950 · Fax (909) 787-4940 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (619) 325-6611 · Fax (619) 322-6921 Pres. Joseph Prevratil (909) 948-9166 Fax (909) 599-3478 Contact: Ted Webb Exec. Dir., Beth Reed Exec. Din, Bob Lundy Big Bear Temecula Victor Valley Big Bear Chamber of Commerce Temecula Chamber of Commerce Victor Valley Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 2860 27450 Ynez Rd. #104 1 4174 Green Tree BIvd. Big Bear, CA 92315 Temecula, CA 92591 Victorville, CA 92392 (909) 866-7000 Fax (909) 866-5412 (909) 676-5090 Fax (909) 694-0201 (619) 245-6506 Fax (619) 245-6505 Contact: Rosemary Rehfuss Contact: Alice Sullivan Contact: Michele Spears LJS