Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012/06/21 - Agenda Packet - Special~~HIVI,HU ~UC;AMCINC;A AGENDA CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, June 21, 2012 ~ 5:00 p.m. City Hall ~ Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive ~ Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A. CALL TO ORDER: A1. Pledge of Allegiance A2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Buquet and Williams B. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC: This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District and City Council on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Board or City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board or City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Mayor and not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, June 21, 2012 4 5:00 p.m. City Hall ~ Council Chambers Page 1 of 5 -- CONTINUED -- FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ~I, ~ _ `' AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 21, 2012 ~ 5:00 P.M. -COUNCIL CHAMBERS The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Board/City Council at one time without discussion. Any item maybe removed by a Board/Council Member for discussion. z I~ C1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-030 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C2. Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Salary Schedules for Fire District Job Classifications. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 C3. Approval of a resolution reducing Board Member stipends for monthly meetings. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REDUCING BOARD MEMBER STIPENDS C4. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2012/2013 General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION 2 8 9 14 15 16 17 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGEND, JUNE 21, 2012 ~R ''~~ ~I~" ~ I~l i~kllJN~~A 5:00 P.M. -COUNCIL CHAMBERS C5. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Appropriations. 19 C6. Consideration of adoption of a Resolution approving an amended Appropriations Limit in the 20 amount of $2,488,710 for Fiscal Year 2011/12 in Community Facilities District No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-034 21 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION C7. Approve and authorize the execution of a Promissory Note between the City and the District 23 to provide funding for the prepayment of the District's side fund liability with CALPERS. ~~ D. CONSENT CALENDAR -CITY COUNCIL ~~ D1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards 25 Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 12-103 26 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D2. Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2012/2013 salary schedules for City job 32 classifications. RESOLUTION NO. 12-104 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS D3. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2011/2012 Appropriations. 41 D4. Approve and authorize the execution of a Promissory Note between the City and the District 42 to provide funding for the prepayment of the District's side fund liability with CALPERS. D5. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2012/2013. 44 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA ~R ~1 ~'~ 11(+(.I ~i,AA1C~Ni JUNE 21, 2012 5:00 P.M. -COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4 The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. E1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund 126 preliminary budget in the amount of $24,203,610 and appropriations limit in the amount of $29,920,117 for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 and set final approval of final budget for July 18, 2012. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-035 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E2. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $6,520,070 and 130 approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $11,397,429 for Fiscal Year 2012/13 in Communities Facilities District ((CFD) No. 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-036 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 134 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION E3. Consideration of adoption of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $1,850,090 and 136 approving the Appropriations Limit in the amount of $2,671,439 for Fiscal Year 2012/13 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-038 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 ~~1 ~ti'r~l ICS ~UCAMI ~NGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA JUNE 21, 2012 5:00 P.M. -COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-039 140 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. F1. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2012/2013 budget and Article XIIIB Appropriations 142 Limit. RESOLUTION NO. 12-106 I 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 12-107 ~ 145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/2013 ADJOU I, Debra L. McKay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 18, 2012 at least twenty-four hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 21, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council convened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Chuck Buquet, Diane Williams; Vice President/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. - ~j Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Bassoon, Deputy City Manager; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Veronica Fletcher, Animal Care and Services Director; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Debra McKay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. B1. Jerie Lee referenced the proposal to promote the three Fire Investigator(s) to Captain Specialist(s) while other employees are being laid off. She noted that all other Departments are doing without and wondered what the Fire Department was sacrificing. She requested reconsideration of this matter. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Council Member for discussion. C1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-030 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C2. Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2012!2013 Salary Schedules for Fire District Job Classifications. * DRAFT* Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes Special Meeting -June 21, 2012 -Page 1 of 6 STAFF REPORT , - : ~; ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~~~('- RANCHO Date: June 21, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO. 54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2) A RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB has issued a new procedure, Statement No. 54, which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the Fire District approved a Fund Balance Policy on June 15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff will annually bring this policy and resolution before the Board for approval at the end of each fiscal year. The policy has been updated to incorporate additional commitments for the Fire District primarily due to the elimination of Redevelopment which has shifted resources to the Fire District for fiscal management. These additional commitments will be for Fire District capital facilities repair. Additionally, a commitment for changes in economic circumstances has been added to be in concurrence with the City's commitments. The attached policy is presented to the Fire Board for review and approval. The attached resolution formally establishes the Fire District's fund balance commitments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. P1 I:Ifinancelbudget20131City Council sfa(/reporfslGASB54-Fire District 2012-13.doc P2 RESOLUTION NO. FD12- 030 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino, California does hereby resolve on this 21St day of June 2012 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of fiscal year end are committed to the goals as outlined in the District's Fund Balance policy, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2151 day of June 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P3 Resolution No. FD12- Page 2 I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, San Bernardino County, California, at an adjourned meeting of said Board of Directors held on the 21S` day of June 2012. Executed this day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk i:Ifinancelbudget20131Ciry Council staff reportslresolufion committing fo the level 01 fiscal reserves-Fire 12-13. doc Exhibit A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION UISTKICT FUND BALANCE POLICY RANCHO C',UCAMONGA PURPOSE POLICY NO.: _ _ PAGE 1 OF 4 EFFECTIVE: June 15, 2011 REVISED: June 21, 2012 APPROVED: This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that there will be adequate financial resources to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. GENERAL POLICY Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts can be spent. • Nonspendable fund balance (inherently nonspendable) • Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use) • Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use) • Assigned fund balance (limitation resulting from intended use) • Unassigned fund balance (residua! ner resources) The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below. Fund Balance Policy Page 2 of 4 Committed Fund Balance The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be determined subsequently. • Changes in Economic Circumstances The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the specific uses of these monies. • City Facilities Capital Repair The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair is established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for governmental activities. • Fire District Facilities Capital Repair The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is. hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities. • Working Capital P5 The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a Fund Balance Policy Page 3 of 4 goal of a minimum of 10% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. • Self-Insurance The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage. • Emnlovee Leave Pavouts The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's labor contracts as of the last day of the fiscal year. • PERS Rate Stabilization The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected rate increases identified in the respective annual Ca1PERS actuarial valuation for two fiscal years after the year of financial reporting. • Disnatch Svstem Acquisition The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current dispatch system. • Bookine Fees The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily determinable at the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State of California's budget. • Vehicle and Equinment Renlacement The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value. • Law Enforcement P6 The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes. Fund Balance Policy Page 4 of 4 • Contract Development Services The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services. Assiened Fund Balance Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance. • Field Rehab Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields, basketball/volleyball courts, and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a rotating basis as determined by management. • Healthy RC Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City. Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City facilities UnassiEned Fund Balance These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories. Fund Balance Classification The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been spent first when an expenditure is incurred for purposes For which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned amounts and then unassigned amounts. P7 This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy. STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Senrices~ RANCHO cUCAMONGA By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director ('~ Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FISCAL YEAR 2072113 SALARY SCHEDULE FOR FIRE DISTRICT JOB CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors adopt the attached resolution approving the FY 2012/13 salary schedules for Fire District job classifications. BACKGROUND The Fire District Board of Directors has previously adopted salary schedules for those classifications employed by the Fire District. Periodically these schedules are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications and changes in job titles. While there are no changes to salaries in FY 2012/13, the schedule reflects a reclassification of a position. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Salary Schedule for Fire Management Group job classifications 3. Salary schedule for Fire Support Services job classifications 4. Salary Schedule for Fire Union job classifications P8 P9 RESOLUTION NO. 12- 031 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules for the Fire Management Employees Group, Fire Support Services Association and Fire Union. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, President Janice Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2012. Executed this day of June, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, Secretary P10 FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO MONTHLY PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Fire Chief A 11,950 B 12,548 C 13,175 D 13.834 E 14,526 F 15,252 Fire Deputy Chief A 10,295 B ^ 0.810 C 1 1.350 D 11.918 E 12,514 F 13,140 Fire Battalion Chief (56 Hour Workweek) A 8,973 B 9.421 C 9.893 D 10,387 E 10,906 N!A Fire Battalion Chief (40 Hour Workweek) A 8.973 B 9.421 C 9,893 D 10,387 E 10,906 NIA Stipend Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Battalion Chief Training Officer A 573.73 B 573 73 C 573.73 D 573.73 E 573.73 Stipend (5.26% of 40 hour BC Ste E Fire Management Revised June 11.2012 P11 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO MONTHLY PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Communications Technician A 4,226 B 4,438 C 4.659 D 4,892 E 5.137 Emergency Medical Serv Administrator A 6,501 B 6,827 C 7,168 D 7,526 E 7.903 Fire Equipment Apprentice Mechanic A 3,220 B 3,381 C 3,550 D 3,728 E 3,914 Fire Equipment Lead Mechanic A 4,438 B 4,659 C 4,892 D 5,137 E 5,394 Fire Equipment Mechanic A 4,025 B 4,226 C 4,438 D 4.659 E 4.892 Fire Information Systems Technician A 4.010 B 4,211 C 4,421 D 4.642 E 4.875 Fire Marshal A 7,614 B 7,995 C 8,395 D 8,814 E 9.255 Fire Prevention Specialist Inspection I A 4,245 B 4,458 C 4,680 D 4,914 E 5.160 Fire Prevention Specialist Inspection II A 4,680 B 4,914 C 5,160 D 5,418 E 5.689 Fire Shop Supervisor A 5,325 B 5,591 C 5,871 D 6,164 E 6,473 Maintenance Officer A 6,053 B 6,355 C 6.673 D 7,007 E 7.357 Management Analyst II A 5,554 B 5,832 C 6,123 D 6,430 E 6.751 Office Specialist I A 2,643 B 2,776 C 2,914 D 3.060 E 3.213 Office Specialist II A 2,921 B 3,067 C 3,220 D 3.381 E 3.550 Plans Examiner-Fire A 5,560 B 5,838 C 6,130 D 6.437 E 6,758 Public Education Specialist A 4,680 B 4,914 C 5,160 D 5,418 E 5,689 Secretary A 3,308 B 3,474 C 3,647 D 3.830 E 4,021 Senior Administrative Secretary A 4,245 B 4,457 C 4,680 D 4.914 E 5.160 Fire Support Services Association Revised June 11.2012 P12 FIRE-PART TIME POSTIONS ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2012 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Fire Equipment Mechanic A 4,025 B 4.226 C 4,437 D 4,659 E 4,892 Fire Clerk A 1,775 B 1,864 C 1,957 D 2,055 E 2,157 Fire Prevention Assistant A 1,775 B 1,864 C 1,957 D 2.055 E 2,157 Fire Prevention Technician A 2,643 B 2,776 C 2,914 D 3,060 E 3,213 Quality Improvement Specialist A 4,817 6 5,058 C 5,311 D 5,576 E 5,855 Emergency Medical Services Quality Improvement Nurse A 7,131 B 7,487 C 7,862 D 8,255 E 8.668 Fire Part Time Revised June 11, 2012 P13 FIRE UNION ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO MONTHLY PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Fire Captain A 6,707 B 7.042 C 7,394 D 7,764 E 8,152 Fire Captain Specialist A 6,707 B 7,042 C 7,394 D 7,764 E 8,152 Fire Engineer A 5,717 B 6,003 C 6,303 D 6,618 E 6,949 Firefighter A 4,996 B 5,246 C 5.508 D 5,784 E 6,073 Fire Inspector A 5,717 B 6.003 C 6,303 D 6,618 E 6,949 Field Trainin Officer A 6,707 B 7,042 C 7,394 D 7.764 E 8,152 Sti end Ste Amount Ste Amount Ste Amount Ste Amount Ste Amount Hazardous Material Stipend (5% of Fire Engineer Step E) A 347 B 347 C 347 D 347 E 347 Paramedic Stipend (12.13% of Fire Engineer Step E) A 843 B 843 C 843 D 843 E 843 Canine Stipend (5% of Fire Engineer Step E) A 347 B 347 C 347 D 347 E 347 Field Training Officer Stipend (9.3% of Fire Captain Step E) A 758 6 758 C 758 D 758 E 758 Fire Union Revised June 11, 2012 STAFF REPORT ADDIINISTRdTIVE SERVICES DEP~RT~IENT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors From: John R. Gillison, City Manager By: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ~~ Subject: REDUCTION IN BOARD MEMBER MEETING STIPEND RANCHO C,UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Approval of a resolution reducing Board Member stipends for monthly meetings. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at the time of incorporation, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Foothill Fire Protection District) already existed as a'separate entity with slightly different boundaries (larger) than the City and responsibility for fire protection. In 1989 the District and the City merged, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District became a legally separate but subsidiary district of the City. Fire Protection District Law provides that a Fire District Board may receive a stipend of up to $100.00 for monthly meeting attendance. The Governing Board of the Fire Protection District has always received a stipend; the last time it was adjusted was 2001, when it was increased from $75.00 to $100.00 for each meeting attended. With the continued fiscal challenges facing all public entities, the Fire Protection District Board now desires to voluntarily reduce its compensation. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Fire District stipend for meeting attendance be reduced to $25.00 per meeting for Board Members, and $17.00 per meeting for the Board President. This amounts to a reduction in overall compensation for City and District service of approximately 10%. A resolution implementing this change is attached to this report. Additionally, the City Council also desires to amend the City's contract with CaIPERS to exclude elected officials from participation in the CaIPERS pension program. Please note that in accordance with state law, this can only apply to officials newly-elected to a position with the City subsequent to the change. Resolutions implementing the contract amendment will be presented to the City Council at an upcoming meeting, and the amended contract will be in place early in the fall of 2012. FISCAL IMPACT The reduction in Board stipends will result in savings of $9,240 annually. This savings has been recognized in the draft City Budget. ATTACHMENTS Resolution P14 P15 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-040 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REDUCING BOARD MEMBER STIPENDS NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that effective July 1St, 2012 the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby establishes that each member of the Board of Directors shall receive a stipend set at $25.00 for Directors, and $17.00 for the Board President, for attending meetings pursuant to the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 13857(a). PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Board President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary of the Board, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of said Board of Directors held on , 2012. Executed this , at Rancho Cucamonga, California Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEP~1RTng'.NT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director(,. RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2012113 GENERAL FUND'S ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached resolution adopting the General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2012/13. BACKGROUND The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the Board of Directors. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 3.77% and a population change of 1.07%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's fiscal year 2012/13 General Fund's appropriations limit is $29,920,117. The District's fiscal year 2012/13 General Fund appropriations subject to this limit total $21,557,140. It is anticipated that the District will be at 72.05% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2013. Attachment Resolution P16 is/finance/budget20>3/City Council staff ref~ortr/Fire DistnctAppropnatiant limit 2012-13.dac P17 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12- 041 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for the prior year be adjusted for change in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article XIII-B. These exclusions are: Debt Service Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies, Enterprise Funds, Capital Improvement Carry-Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra-Governmental Service Funds, Reserves for Workers Compensation, Long-Term Disability, Retirement, Unemployment and other reserve funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the aforementioned sections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to be in the best interest of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that said General Fund's appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 be established in the amount of $29,920,117. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 pursuant to Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $29,920,117 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 215' day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary L. Dennis Michael, President P18 I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2012. Executed this _ day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEP.IRTMF_NT Date: June 21, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director' Subject: APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 APPROPRIATIONS P19 RANCHO cUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council/Fire Board approve the corrections to the Fiscal Year 2011/12 Amended Budget as summarized in table below. BACKGROUND On May 2, 2012, the City Council/Fire Board approved the Amended Fiscal Year 2011/12 Appropriations. Subsequent to the approval of the amended appropriations, it was determined that certain line items within the amended appropriations would be insufficient to fund the remainder of the fiscal year. Consequently, it is necessary for staff to submit corrections to certain line items included in the amended appropriations. The corrections are noted in the table below. CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 APPROPRIATIONS AMENDED CORRECTED FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION FY 2011/12 FY 2011/12 Prop 42-Traffic Other 190 Congestion 5725 Expenditures $0 $157,000 Miti ation 290 Library Fund 5207 O&M/Capital $0 $51 760 Su lies , 204 CDBG 4740 Grant Income $1,941,730 $1,198,450 Reimbursement 281 Fire Fund 4916 from OPEB $684,610 $710,760 Trust 5032 Medicallns- $789 630 $810 750 Retired , , 5057 PEMHCA- $67 980 $71 010 Retired , , is /finance/ budget2012/City Council staff repanr/Staff Aepan-amended budget 11-12-mrrection.cdoc STAFF REPORT R-\NCHO CUC~IMONGd FIRE PROTL'CTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: June 21, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike BeII, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,488,710 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RECOMMENDATION Approval of a resolution adopting an amended appropriations limit in the amount of $2,488,710 for fiscal year 2011/12 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The ordinance authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs (which includes personnel) to provide fire protection services within CFD 88-1. On June 9, 2011, staff submitted the fiscal year 2011/12 appropriations limit for CFD 88-1 as a resolution for approval by the Board. Subsequent to the approval of the resolution, it was determined that the calculation for the appropriations limit needed to be revised due to an error in the calculation of the maximum authorized special taxes. The attached resolution reflects the amended appropriations limit of $2,488,710 and is being submitted for Board approval. Respe Ily Submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief P20 Attachment Resolution No. FD 12-034 P21 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-034 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, as a result of such election, the qualified electors of the District authorized the establishment of anArticle XIII-B appropriations limit for the District equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to establish the amended appropriations limit for the District for fiscal year 2011/12. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Appropriations Limit. This legislative body hereby establishes the amended appropriations limit for Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for fiscal year 2011/12 in an amount equal to $2,488,710. SECTION 2. Approval by Electorate. This legislative body hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been authorized by the qualified electors of the District at a special election held on April 4, 1989, in the manner provided by law. P22 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2012. AYES: ABSTAINED: NOES: ABSENT: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held of the _ day of 2012. California. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 12-034 -Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTNIEN"P Date: June 21, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors P23 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Servicesl,~ By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director PP Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROMISSORY NOTE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE PREPAYMENT OF THE DISTRICT'S SIDE FUND LIABILITY WITH CALPERS RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends that the Council and the Board approve and authorize the execution of a promissory note between the City and the District to provide funding for the prepayment of the District's side fund liability with CaIPERS. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The District provides pension benefits to its employees through the CaIPERS program. These benefits are provided through two separate plans - a safety plan for sworn personnel and a miscellaneous plan for non-sworn personnel. When the District's plans were last updated, a new actuarial liability for the District's retirement benefits with CaIPERS was created. The liability, which is accounted for in what CaIPERS terms a "side fund," would then be amortized over an established period of time to reduce the annual financial impact to the District and is included as a component of the District's employer contribution rates. Currently, the District's safety plan has a remaining side fund liability of $6,800,500 with an amortization period of 16 years and the miscellaneous plan has a remaining side fund liability of $279,538 with an amortization period of 6 years. When the side funds are paid off, there is a corresponding reduction in the District's payment to CaIPERS. It has been determined by staff that it would be beneficial to the District, as well as the City, to prepay the District's side fund liability with CaIPERS (currently being charged interest at 7.75%) with a combination of the use of District's PERS Rate Stabilization reserve ($2,523,840) and a loan from the City's Capital Reserve ($4,556,198) at an interest rate of 4.5%. The prepayment would result in an immediate reduction in the District's employer contribution rates. Based on a 16-year amortization period, the District would be responsible for annual loan payments in the amount of $399,985 which would result in annual PERS cost savings of $590,388, for a net positive annual impact to the District of $190,403. In order for the rate reduction to take effect for FY 2012/13, the payment to CaIPERS must occur by June 30, 2012. To facilitate this timing, staff is requesting the Council and the Board's approval and authorization to execute the attached promissory note so that funds can be disbursed from the City to the District with sufficient time to meet the deadline established by CaIPERS. Attachment P24 UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE $4,556,198.00 Rancho Cucamonga, California ' June 21, 2012 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, a public entity ("Borrower") hereby promises to pay to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Lender"), or order, the principal amount of FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($4,556,198.00), plus interest as provided below. 1. Commencing on the date hereof, principal hereunder shall accrue simple interest at the rate of 4.5 percent (4.5%) per annum. 2. Commencing on July 15, 2012, payments of $33,332.06 shall be made monthly on the 15th day of each calendar month. Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to principal. 3. All outstanding principal and accrued interest shall become due and payable on the earlier of July 15, 2028 or the occurrence of a default hereunder. 4. Outstanding principal may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time. 5. All sums payable under this Unsecured Promissory Note (the "Note") are payable to Lender at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, or at such other place as the City Manager of Lender may inform the Borrower in writing, in lawful money of the United States. 6. The Borrower waives presentment for payment, demand, protest, and notices of dishonor and of protest; the benefits of all waivable exemptions; and all defenses and pleas on the ground of any extension or extensions of the time of payment or of any due date under this Note, in whole or in part, whether before or afrer maturity and with or without notice. 7. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be incurred by the holder hereof, in the enforcement of this Note. 8. The failure of Lender to exercise any right or remedy (and any delay in the exercise of such right or remedy), shall not constitute a waiver of such right or remedy. 9. This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 10. If the interest rate stated above is greater than the maximum rate permitted by law, it shall be deemed to be reduced to the maximum rate permitted by law. BORROWER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT By: 11231-0001\1467212v1.doc r ~j_ STAFF REPORT s =` ~ `~ ~ S- ~ AllMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPART,Y(ENT ~`' `r RANCHO Date: June 21, 2012 ~ C,UCAbIONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVAL OF THE FOLLOWING TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (GASB) STATEMENT NO. 54: 1) UPDATED FUND BALANCE POLICY AND 2) A RESOLUTION COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy and 2) a resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND On a regular basis, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) adopts new policies and procedures that apply to public entities. In the prior year, GASB has issued a new procedure, Statement No. 54, which applies to Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In order to be in compliance with GASB 54, the City Council approved a Fund Balance Policy on June 15, 2011 and approved a resolution committing to the level of reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to accommodate any changes to these commitments that may become necessary due to changes in operations or changes in City Council goals, staff will annually bring this policy and resolution before the City Council for approval at the end of each fiscal year. No changes have been made to the policy for the City's commitments. However, the policy has been updated to incorporate additional commitments for the Fire District primarily due to the elimination of Redevelopment which has shifted resources to the Fire District for fiscal management. These additional commitments will be for Fire District capital facilities repair. Additionally, a commitment for changes in economic circumstances has been added to be in concurrence with the City's commitments. The attached policy is presented to the City Council for review and approval. The attached resolution formally establishes the City of Rancho Cucamonga's fund balance commitments for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012. P25 I:Ifinancelbudget20121City Council staff reportslGAS854-City 2012-13.doc P26 RESOLUTION NO. 12- l03 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to protect existing services, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to be prepared for emergencies, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain good fiscal management and fiscal structure to operate a municipal corporation, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council desires to maintain the financial strength required to obtain beneficial bond ratings for the City; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 2151 day of June 2012 that the level of fiscal reserves maintained by the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of fiscal year end are committed to the goals as outlined in the City's Fund Balance Policy, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 215` day of June 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: P27 Resolution No. 12- Page 2 Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at an adjourned meeting of said City Council held on the 2151 day of June 2012. Executed this day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk i:Ifinancel6udget20131Ciry Council staff reportslresolufion committing to level of fiscal reserves-City 12-i3.doc Exhik~'t84 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTKICT FUND BALANCE POLICY xANCHO C,UCAMONGA PURPOSE POLICY NO.: _ _ PAGE 1 OF 4 EFFECTIVE: June I5, 2011 REVISED: June 21, 2012 APPROVED: This Fund Balance Policy establishes the procedures for the reporting of unrestricted fund balance in the City General Fund and Fire District financial statements. Certain commitments and assignments of fund balance will help ensure that [here will be adequate financial resources to protect the City against unforeseen circumstances and events such as revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. The policy also authorizes and directs the Finance Director to prepare financial reports which accurately categorize fund balance as per Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GABS) Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions. GENERAL POLICY Fund balance is essentially the difference between the assets and liabilities reported in a governmental fund. There are five separate components of fund balance, each of which identifies the extent to which the City/Fire District is bound to honor constraints on the specific purposes for which amounts can be spent. • Nonspendable fund balance (inherently nonspendable) • Restricted fund balance (externally enforceable limitations on use) • Committed fund balance (self-imposed limitations on use) • Assigned fund balance (limitation resulting from intended use) • Unassigned fund balance (residua! net resources) The first two components listed above are not addressed in this policy due to the nature of their restrictions. An example of nonspendable fund balance is inventory. Restricted fund balance is either imposed by law or constrained by grantors, contributors, or laws or regulations of other governments. This policy is focused on financial reporting of unrestricted fund balance, or the last three components listed above. These three components are further defined below. Fund Balance Policy Page 2 of 4 Committed Fund Balance The City Council (which also acts as the Board of Directors for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District), as the City's highest level of decision-making authority, may commit fund balance for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal actions taken, such as an ordinance or resolution. These committed amounts cannot be used For any other purpose unless the City Council/Fire Board removes or changes the specified use through the same type of formal action taken to establish the commitment. City Council/Fire Board action to commit fund balance needs to occur within the fiscal reporting period; however, the amount can be determined subsequently. • Changes in Economic Circumstances The City's General Fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the City General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for changes in economic circumstances is established at a goal of a six month reserve, or 50% of the Fire District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. As defined in the resolution establishing this commitment, the specific uses are listed as the declaration of a state or federal state of emergency or a local emergency as defined in Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.36.020; or a change in economic circumstances in a given fiscal year that results in revenues to the City/Fire District being insufficient to cover expenditures for one or more fiscal years. The City Council/Fire Board may, by the affirming vote of three members, change the amount of this commitment and/or the specific uses of these monies. • Citv Facilities Capital Repair The City's General Fund balance committed for City facilities capital repair is established at a minimum goal of 25% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for governmental activities. • Fire District Facilities Capital Repair The Fire District's fund balance committed for the Fire District facilities capital repair is hereby committed to a minimum goal of 50% of capital assets value comprised of construction in progress (excluding infrastructure), building improvements, and improvements other than building for public safety-fire activities. • Working Capital P29 The City's General Fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a goal of a minimum of 5% of the City's General Fund operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The Fire District's fund balance committed for Working Capital is established at a Fund Balance Policy Page 3 of 4 goal of a minimum of 10% of the District's operating budget for the upcoming fiscal year. • Self-Insurance The City's General Fund balance committed for payment of general liability claims primarily through the use of interest earnings on the reserve but not limited to such in the event of an unfavorable interest rate environment is established at a minimum goal of three times the City's total yearly SIR for all types of insurance coverage. • Emnlovee Leave Pa~uts The City's General Fund balance and the Fire District's fund balance committed for employee leave payouts as valued in accordance with the City's-labor contracts as of the last day of the fiscal year. • PERS Rate Stabilization The City's General Fund and Fire District's fund balance committed to offset projected rate increases identified in the respective annual CaIPERS actuarial valuation for two fiscal years after the year of financial reporting. • Dispatch System Acquisition The Fire District's fund balance committed to JPA membership for the District's current dispatch system. • Booking Fees The City's General Fund balance committed to provide funding for an increase in the booking fees charged to the City by the County of San Bernardino not readily. determinable a[ the time of budget adoption due to the delay in the adoption of the State of California's budget. • Vehicle and Equ~ment Replacement The Fire District's fund balance committed for the replacement of fire safety vehicles and equipment as determined based on the District's replacement criteria is established at a minimum goal of 50% of District vehicle and equipment replacement value. • Law Enforcement P30 The City's General Fund balance committed for public safety purposes. Fund Balance Policy Page 4 of 4 • Contract Development Services The City's General Fund balance committed for contract development services. Assiened Fund Balance Amounts that are constrained by the City/Fire District's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed, should be reported as assigned fund balance. This policy hereby delegates the authority to assign amounts to be used for specific purposes to the City Manager and/or Finance Director for the purpose of reporting these amounts in the annual financial statements. The following are a few non-exclusive examples of assigned fund balance. • Field Rehab Established to provide funding sufficient to regularly rehabilitate the various sports fields, basketball/volleyball courts, and parks not fully funded by special assessments on a rotating basis as determined by management. • Healthy RC Established to provide funding for the various programs and initiatives sponsored by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to promote healthy eating and active living within the City. Included in this reserve is funding for energy efficiency projects on City Facilities Unassiened Fund Balance These are residual positive net resources of the General Fund and Fire District funds in excess of what can properly be classified in one of the other four categories. Fund Balance Classification The accounting policies of the City/Fire District consider restricted fund balance to have been spent first when an expenditure is incurred For purposes for which both restricted and unrestricted fund balance is available. Similarly, when an expenditure is incurred for purposes for which amounts in any of the unrestricted classifications of fund balance could be used, the City/Fire District considers committed amounts to be reduced first, followed by assigned amounts and then unassigned amounts. This policy is in place to provide a measure of protection for the City/Fire District against unforeseen circumstances and to comply with GASB Statement No. 54. No other policy or procedure supersedes the authority and provisions of this policy. P31 STAFF REPORT ADbIINISTRdTIVE SERVICES DEPt1RTMENT Date: June 21, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director RANCHO cUCAMONGA Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SALARY SCHEDULES FOR CITY JOB CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the FY 2012/13 salary schedules for City job classifications. BACKGROUND The City Council has previously adopted salary schedules for those classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Periodically these schedules are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications and changes in job titles. While there are no changes in salaries for the fiscal year, there have been some additions and deletions of positions which are reflected in the FY 2012/13 budget. Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Salary Schedule for Executive Management employee job classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General employee job classifications 4. Salary Schedule for Maintenance Bargaining Unit (SBPEA) employee job classifications P32 P33 RESOLUTION NO. 12- 104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules and to permit the City Council to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System, the PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan and to participate in the Executive Management Executive Wellness Plan, and a monthly mileage allowance in the amount of two hundred dollars. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Janice Reynolds, City Clerk I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of June, 2012. Executed this day of June, 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk *CORRECTION* -June 21, 2012 -City Council and Fire Protection District -Special Budget Meeting -Item D2 (P34). Approval of a resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2012/2013 salary schedules for City job classifications. -RESOLUTION NO. 12-104 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step amount Step Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 7,310 1602 8,924 1632 10.364 Assistant Cit Clerk/ Records M r. 1514 5,754 1554 7,024 1584 8.158 Assistant Cit Mana er 1637 10,626 1677 12.972 1707 15,066 Buildin and Safe Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 11,169 Cit Mana er 1734 17,238 1774 21,044 1804 24,440 Communit Services Director 1595 8,618 1635 10,521 1665 12,219 De ut Cit Mana er/Administrative Services 1615 9,522 1655 11.624 1685 13,500 De u Cit Mana er/ Econ. & Comm. Dev. 1615 9.522 1655 11.624 1685 13.500 En Svs Director/Cit En ineer 1596 8,661 1636 10.573 1666 12.280 Finance Director 1597 8,704 1637 10.626 1667 12.341 Human Resources Director 1589 8,364 1629 10,210 1659 11,858 Libra Director 1579 7,957 1619 9,714 1649 11,281 Plannin Director 1589 8,364 1629 10.210 1659 11,858 Public Works Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 11.169 Fire Chief A i 1,950.28 F 15,251.92 Executive Management Revised June 11, 2012 P34 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 7,310 1602 8,924 1632 10364 Assistant Cit Clerk/ Records M r. 1514 5,754 1554 7.024 1584 8,158 Assistant Cit Mana er 1637 10,62E 1677 12.972 1707 15,066 Buildin and Safet Services Director 1577 7.878 1617 9,617 1647 11,169 Cit Mana er 1734 "7,238 1774 21,044- 1804 24,440 Communit Services Director 1595 8,618 1635 10,521 1665 12,219 De ut Cit Mana er/Administrative Services 1615 9,522 1655 11,624 1685 13,500 De ut Cit Mana er/ Econ. & Comm. Dev. 1615 9,522 1655 11,624 1685 13,500 En Svs Director/Cit En ineer 1596 8,661 1636 10,573 1666 12,280 Finance Director 1597 8.704 1637 10.625 1667 12.341 Human Resources Director 1589 8,364 1629 10.210 1659 11.858 Libra Director 1579 7,957 1619 9.714 1649 11.281 Plannin Director 1589 8,364 1629 10.21 C 1659 11.858 Public Works Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 1 1.169 Redevelo ment Director 1612 9,380 1652 11.452 1682 13,300 Fire Chief A ' 1.95028 F ~ 5.251.92 Executive Management Revised June 11, 2012 P35 Resolution No. MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORYlPROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 2,850 4415 3.480 4425 3,658 Account Technician 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Accountant# 3465 4,462 3505 5,448 3515 5,726 Accounting Manager" 2525 6,019 2565 7,348 2575 7,724 Administrative Secrets ~ 4424 3,640 4464 4,443 4474 4,670 Administrative Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Animal Care Attendant 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Animal Caretaker 4378 2.893 4418 3.532 4428 3,713 Animal Care Supervisor# 3416 3,495 3456 4,267 3466 4,485 Animal Center Manager" 2506 5. 475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Animal Handler 4388 3,041 4428 3,713 4438 3,903 Animal License Canvasser 4349 2.504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3.550 Animal Services Officer 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Assistant City Clerk # 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Assistant City Engineer" 2590 8,324 2630 10,162 2640 10,682 Assistant Electrician 5430 3,747 5470 4,574 5480 4,808 Assistant Engineer# 3488 5,005 3528 6.110 3538 6,422 Assistant Library Director* 2572 7.610 2612 9,290 2622 9,765 Assistant Planner# 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Assistant Planning Director* 2583 8.039 2623 9.814 2633 10,315 Assistant to the City Manager" 2548 6.751 2588 8.242 2598 8,663 Associate Engineer# 3518 5.813 3558 7,096 3568 7,459 Associate Planner# 3487 4,980 3527 6,079 3537 6,390 Benefits Technician 4399 3.213 4439 3,922 4449 4,123 Box Office Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Budget Analyst# 3498 5.261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Buildin Ins ection Su ervisor#2 3504 5,421 3544 6,617 3554 6,956 Buildin Ins ectorz 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Business License Clerk 4378 2,893 4418 3,532 4428 3,713 Business License Inspector 4418 3,532 4458 4,312 446$ 4,533 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 3,785 3472 4,621 3482 4,857 Business License Technician 4408 3.360 4448 4,102 4458 4,312 Buyer I 4411 3,411 4451 4,164 4461 4,377 Buyer II # 3433 3,804 3473 4,644 3483 4,882 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised June 11, 2012 P36 Code Enforcement Officer 4441 3.962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Code Enforcement Su ervisor#2 3481 4,833 3521 5,900 3531 6,202 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 4.143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Programs Specialist 4437 3.883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Services Coordinator 4450 4.143 4490 5.058 4500 5,317 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Services Superintendent'' 2536 6,359 2576 7.763 2586 8,160 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 4.809 3520 5.871 3530 6,171 Community Services Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 3,748 3470 4,575 3480 4,809 Engineering Aide 4421 3,585 4461 4.377 4471 4,601 Engineering Technician 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Environmental Pro rams Ins ectorz 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 6,455 2579 7,880 2589 8,283 Executive Assistant* 2460 4.353 2500 5,314 2510 5,585 Facilities Superintendent" 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Fleet Su enrisor#2 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 GIS Analyst 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 GIS Technician 4436 3,864 4476 4,717 4486 4,958 GIS/Special District Manager* 2538 6,423 2578 7,841 2588 8,242 Human Resources Manager* 2583 8,039 2623 9,814 2633 10,315 Information Services Analyst I# 3505 5,448 3545 6,650 3555 6,991 Information Services Analyst II# 3520 5,871 3560 7,167 3570 7,534 Information Services Manager* 2584 8,079 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Information Services Projects Coord# 3508 5,530 3548 6,751 3558 7,096 Information Services Specialist I 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 Information Services Specialist II 4471 4.601 4511 5,617 4521 5,904 Librarian I# 3435 3.842 3475 4,691 3485 4,930 Librarian II# 3457 4.288 3497 5,235 3507 5,502 Library Assistant I# 3373 2,820 3413 3.443 3423 3,619 Library Assistant II# 3414 3,460 3454 4,224 3464 4,440 Library Clerk 4356 2.593 4396 3,165 4406 3,327 Library Page 4244 1.483 4284 1,810 4294 1,903 Library Page I I 4293 1,894 4333 2,312 4343 2.430 Library Services Manager" 2506 5,475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Maintenance Su ervisor#Z 3488 5,005 3528 6,110 3538 6,422 Management Aide 4440 3.942 4480 4,812 4490 5,058 Management Analyst I# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Management Analyst II# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Management Analyst III# 3515 5.726 3555 6,991 3565 7,348 Office Services Clerk 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 Office Specialist I 4349 2.504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised June 11, 2012 P37 Office Specialist II 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 Park/Landsca a Maintenance Su t*2 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Personnel Clerk 4389 3,057 4429 3,731 4439 3,922 Plan Check 8~ Inspection Manager* 2533 6,264 2573 7,648 2583 8,039 Planning Commission Secretary# 3444 4,019 3484 4,906 3494 5,157 Planning Specialist 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Planning Technician 4423 3.621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Plans Examiner# 3482 4.857 3522 5,930 3532 6,233 Principal Librarian* 2495 5,183 2535 6,327 2545 6.651 Principal Management Analyst* 2543 6.585 2583 8.039 2593 8,450 Principal Planner* 2537 6.391 2577 7,802 2587 8,201 Public Services Technician I 4413 3.445 4453 4,206 4463 4,421 Public Services Technician II 4423 3,621 4463 4.421 4473 4,647 Public Services Technician III 4443 4,001 4483 4.885 4493 5,135 Public Works Ins ector 12 4444 4.021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Public Works Ins ector 112 4464 4,443 4504 5.424 4514 5,702 Public Works Maintenance Manager* 2566 7,385 2606 9.016 2616 9,477 Public Works Safet Coordinator #2 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Purchasing Clerk 4374 2,836 4414 3,462 4424 3,640 Purchasing Manager* 2530 6,171 2570 7,534 2580 7,919 Records Clerk 4358 2,619 4398 3,197 4408 3,360 Records Coordinator 4386 3,011 4426 3,676 4436 3,864 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Secreta ' 4394 3.134 4434 3,826 4444 4,021 Senior Account Clerk 4395 3,149 4435 3.845 4445 4,041 Senior Account Technician 4446 4,062 4486 4,958 4496 5,212 Senior Accountant# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Senior Administrative Secreta ' 4444 4,021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 4,374 3501 5,340 3511 5,613 Senior Buildin Ins ector#2 3484 4,906 3524 5.989 3534 6,295 Senior Buyer# 3463 4,418 3503 5,394 3513 5,669 Senior Civil Engineer* 2547 6.717 2587 8,201 2597 8,620 Senior Code Enforcement Officer# 3461 4.374 3501 5,340 3511 5,613 Senior Electrician # 3485 4.930 3525 6,019 3535 6,327 Senior GIS Analyst # 3484 4.906 3524 5.989 3534 6,295 Senior Information Services Analyst# 3535 6,327 3575 7,724 3585 8,119 Senior Information Services Specialist 4493 5.135 4533 6.268 4543 6,589 Senior Librarian# 3468 4,530 3508 5.530 3518 5,813 Senior Park Planner# 3500 5.313 3540 6,487 3550 6,818 Senior Planner* 2517 5.784 2557 7.061 2567 7,422 Senior Plans Examiner# 3497 5,235 3537 6,390 3547 6,717 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised June 11, 2012 P38 Special Districts Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Su t*2 2536 6.359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Su ervisin Public Works Ins ector#2 3494 5,157 3534 6,295 3544 6,617 Technical Production Coordinator 4460 4,355 4500 5,317 4510 5,589 Theatre Technician III 4423 3.621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Traffic Engineer` 2569 7,496 2609 9,152 2619 9,620 Utilities Division Manager' 2584 8.079 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Utility Operations Manager" 2524 5.989 2564 7,312 2574 7,686 Veterinarian" 2579 7.880 2619 9,620 2629 10,112 Veterinary Assistant 4407 3.344 4447 4,082 4457 4,291 Veterinary Technician 4437 3.883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 ' When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of $50 at the option of the employee. z Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance. # Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class * Denotes Management Class Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised June 11, 2012 P39 Minimum Control Point Maximum Account Clerk 6368 15.87 6408 19.37 6418 20.36 Administrative Intern 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Animal Care Attendant 6349 14.43 6389 17.62 6399 18.52 Animal Caretaker 6378 16.69 6418 20.38 6428 21.42 Animal License Canvasser 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 6316 12.26 Animal Services Dis atcher 6369 15.95 6409 19.47 6419 20.46 Animal Services Officer 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Assistant Pool Mana er 6305 11.60 6345 14.16 6355 14.87 Box Office Assistant 6290 10.76 6330 13.13 6340 13.81 Box Office S ecialist 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Business License Clerk 6378 16.69 6418 20.38 6428 21.42 Code Enforcement Officer 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Ener Efficienc Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Environmental Resources 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 GIS Pro yammer/Anal st 6456 24.61 6496 30.05 6506 31.58 GIS Intern 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Health Cities Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Instructor/Guard I 6240 8.38 6280 10.23 6290 10.76 Instructor/Guard II 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 Libra Aide 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Librarian I 6433 21.95 6473 26.79 6483 28.16 Libra Assistant I 6362 15.41 6402 18.81 6412 19.77 Libra Assistant II 6404 18.99 6444 23.20 6454 24.37 Libra Clerk 6346 14.22 6386 17.37 6396 18.25 Libra Pa e 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Libra Pa a II 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 z 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 Office S ecialist I 6332 13.25 6372 16.19 6382 17.02 Office S ecialist II 6352 14.65 6392 17.89 6402 18.80 Outreach Technician 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Personnel Clerk 6389 17.62 6429 21.51 6439 22.61 Plannin Aide 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Pool Mana er 6329 13.07 6369 15.95 6379 16.76 Pro ram Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Pro ram S ecialist 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Purchasin Clerk 6368 15.87 6408 19.37 6418 20.37 Rece tionist 6342 13.94 6382 17.02 6392 17.89 Records Clerk 6344 14.08 6384 17.19 6394 18.08 Records Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Recreation Attendant 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Recreation Assistant 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 6316 12.26 Recreation Leader 6290 10.76 6330 13.13 6340 13.81 Senior Civil En ineer 6543 37.99 6583 46.37 6593 48.75 Theatre Technician I 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Theatre Technician II 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Veterina Assistant 6400 18.62 6440 22.73 6450 23.89 Veterinar Technician 6434 22.40 6474 27.35 6484 28.74 City Part Time Revised June 11, 2012 P40 Resolution No. PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES JULY 2012 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Electrician 5457 4,287 5497 5,234 5507 5,502 Equipment Operator 5425 3,655 5465 4,462 5475 4,690 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat 5389 3,054 5429 3,729 5439 3,919 Lead Maintenance Worker 5429 3,729 5469 4,552 5479 4,785 Lead Mechanic 5440 3,939 5480 4,808 5490 5,054 Maintenance Coordinator 5452 4,182 5492 5,105 5502 5,366 Maintenance Worker 5391 3.085 5431 3,766 5441 3,958 Mechanic 5430 3,747 5470 4,574 5480 4,808 Senior Maintenance Worker 5401 3,243 5441 3,958 5451 4,161 Signal & Lighting Coordinator 5479 4,785 5519 5.841 5529 6,140 Signal & Lighting Technician 5452 4,182 5492 5.105 5502 5.366 Public Works Maint. Employees Revised June 11, 2012 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTR~ITIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 21, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director'. Subject: APPROVAL OF CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 APPROPRIATIONS P41 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA RECOMMENDATION It is requested that the City Council/Fire Board approve the corrections to the Fiscal Year 2011/12 Amended Budget as summarized in table below. BACKGROUND On May 2, 2012, the City Council/Fire Board approved the Amended Fiscal Year 2011/12 Appropriations. Subsequent to the approval of the amended appropriations, it was determined that certain line items within the amended appropriations would be insufficient to fund the remainder of the fiscal year. Consequently, it is necessary for staff to submit corrections to certain line items included in the amended appropriations. The corrections are noted in the table below. CORRECTIONS TO AMENDED FISCAL YEAR 2011/12 APPROPRIATIONS AMENDED CORRECTED FUND DESCRIPTION OBJECT DESCRIPTION FY 2011/12 FY 2011/12 Prop 42-Traffic Other 190 Congestion 5725 Expenditures $0 $157,000 Miti ation 290 Library Fund 5207 O&M/Capital $0 $51,760 Su lies 204 CDBG 4740 Grant Income $1,941,730 $1,198,450 Reimbursement 281 Fire Fund 4916 from OPEB $684,610 $710,760 Trust 5032 Medicallns- $789 630 $810,750 Retired , 5057 PEMHCA- $67 980 $71,010 Retired , is/finance/budget2012/City Counal staffreportr/Staff Beport-amended budget 11-12-carrectionr.doc STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPAR'ITTT(ENT RANCHO Date: June 21, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services~~~ t By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Subject: APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A PROMISSORY NOTE BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THE PREPAYMENT OF THE DISTRICT'S SIDE FUND LIABILITY WITH CALPERS RECOMMENDATION Staff respectfully recommends that the Council and the Board approve and authorize the execution of a promissory note between the City and the District to provide funding for the prepayment of the District's side fund liability with CaIPERS. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The District provides pension benefits to its employees through the CaIPERS program. These benefits are provided through two separate plans - a safety plan for sworn personnel and a miscellaneous plan for non-sworn personnel. When the District's plans were last updated, a new actuarial liability for the District's retirement benefits with CaIPERS was created. The liability, which is accounted for in what CaIPERS terms a "side fund,° would then be amortized over an established period of time to reduce the annual financial impact to the District and is included as a component of the District's employer contribution rates. Currently, the District's safety plan has a remaining side fund liability of $6,800,500 with an amortization period of 16 years and the miscellaneous plan has a remaining side fund liability of $279,538 with an amortization period of 6 years. When the side funds are paid off, there is a corresponding reduction in the District's payment to CaIPERS. It has been determined by staff that it would be beneficial to the District, as well as the City, to prepay the District's side fund liability with CaIPERS (currently being charged interest at 7.75%) with a combination of the use of District's PERS Rate Stabilization reserve ($2,523,840) and a loan from the City's Capital Reserve ($4,556,198) at an interest rate of 4.5%. The prepayment would result in an immediate reduction in the District's employer contribution rates. Based on a 16-year amortization period, the District would be responsible for annual loan payments in the amount of $399,985 which would result in annual PERS cost savings of $590,388, for a net positive annual impact to the District of $190,403. In order for the rate reduction to take effect for FY 2012/13, the payment to CaIPERS must occur by June 30, 2012. To facilitate this timing, staff is requesting the Council and the Board's approval and authorization to execute the attached promissory note so that funds can be disbursed from the City to the District with sufficient time to meet the deadline established by CaIPERS. P42 Attachment P43 UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE $4,556,198.00 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 21, 2012 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, a public entity ("Borrower") hereby promises to pay to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Lender"), or order, the principal amount of FOUR MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY-SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY-EIGHT DOLLARS AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($4,556,198.00), plus interest as provided below. 1. Commencing on the date hereof, principal hereunder shall accrue simple interest at the rate of 4.5 percent (4.5%) per annum. 2. Commencing on July 15, 2012, payments of $33,332.06 shall be made monthly on the 15th day of each calendar month. Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to principal. 3. All outstanding principal and accrued interest shall become due and payable on the earlier of July I5, 2028 or the occurrence of a default hereunder. 4. Outstanding principal may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time. 5. All sums payable under this Unsecured Promissory Note (the "Note") aze payable to Lender at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, or at such other place as the City Manager of Lender may inform the Borrower in writing, in lawful money of the United States. 6. The Borrower waives presentment for payment, demand, protest, and notices of dishonor and of protest; the benefits of all waivable exemptions; and all defenses and pleas on the ground of any extension or extensions of the time of payment or of any due date under this Note, in whole or in part, whether before or after maturity and with or without notice. 7. The Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, which may be incurred by the holder hereof, in the enforcement of this Note. 8. The failure of Lender to exercise any right or remedy (and any delay in the exercise of such right or remedy), shall not constitute a waiver of such right or remedy. 9. This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 10. If the interest rate stated above is greater than the maximum rate permitted by law, it shall be deemed to be reduced to the maximum rate permitted by law. BORROWER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT By: 11231-0001\1467212v1.doc P44 STAFF REPORT ~~ ENGINEERING DEPdRTbfENT Date: June 21, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer: ~`~( Susanna Smith, Management Analyst I F' Subject: Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Staff recommends that the City Council approve the FY 2012/13 Capital Improvement Program. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Attached for your approval is the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2012!2013. The CIP consists of a multi-year plan for citywide infrastructural improvements. Each year, the City budgets for "funded" projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures committed in any giveri year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long- and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. The City's Engineering Services staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's_ public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of a wealth of plarining and conceptual design taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, local development community, and external government agencies. The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), and are in alphabetical order within each category. A summary of the project costs by category along with a map showing project locations is attached. Projects can be funded from a variety of sources including development impact fees, state pass-thru monies such as Gas Tax funds, grants, enterprise funds and City reserves. This year's budgeted projects total just over $47,000,000 and will fund 49 projects citywide. The FY 2012/2013 Capital Improvement Program was also reviewed by the Planning Commission on May 23, 2012. At that meeting, the Commission made a finding that the CIP is in conformance with the City's General Plan. Respe d miffed, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Attachment: FY 2012/2013 Capital Improvement Program P46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 SUMMARY A. Beautification ................... ......... (6) B. Drainage .......................... ......... (2) C. Facilities .......................... ......... (4) D. Miscellaneous .................. ........ (8) E. Municipal Utility .............. ....... (1) F. Parks ............................... ......... (5) G. Railroad Crossings .......... ......... (1j H. Streets .........................:... ......... (19) I. Traffic .............................. ......... (3) TOTAL ....................... ......... (49) General Plan: Policv Reference $ 619,850 GP: CM-3.10, CM-3.11,PS-12.7 $ 110,000 GP: CM-1.1 $ 1,262,750 GP: ED-3.1, PF-1.1, PF-1.4, PF-1.5 $ 2,214,800 GP: CS-6.3, LU-11.2, PS-12.4 $ 60,000 GP: PF-1.a $ 783,495 GP: CS-1.8 $ 75,000 GP: CM-4.4 $ 41,357,836 GP: CM-1.1, CM-4.4 $ 590,000 GP: CM-4.1, CM-4.2 $ 47,073,731 J. Future & Unfunded Projects..... (10) K. RDA Unfunded Projects........... (5) $ 35,280,000 GP: CM-3.11, CM-a.a, CS-1.8, ED-3.1 $ 93,740,000 GP: CM-1.1, ED-4.4, PF-3.1 P47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2012113 No. Project Fund Account Amount (S) 1 Beautification 2 Archibald Ave from north of Norbrook Dr to Carrari S[ -Community Trail Beautification 1110316565011830110-0 10.000 on the west Side (C.OnS1NCtlOn FY13114) 3 Haven Ave from 4th St to 19th St -Median Island ReVOfit LMD 4R 1134303565011129134-0 30,000 (Concept and Design) LMD 38 1133303565011129133-0 10,000 Citywide Infrastructure 1198303565011129198-0 1 000 50.000 4 Haven Ave from Wilson Ave to Vivienda St -Community Trail on the west side Beautification 1110316565011829110-0 2.000 5 LMD 1 Trail -Concrete Drainage Improvement Beautification 11103165650!1551110-0 14,850 6 LMD 4R Improvements - Paseo Lighting Retrofits LMD 4R 1134303565011716134-0 143,000 7 LMD 4R Improvements -Water Conservation/Landscape Renovations LMD 4R 1134303565011787134-0 400,000 Beautification Total: 619,850 B Drainage 9 Hellman Ave (Lower Reach) from Cucamonga Creek Channel to north of General Drainage 1112303565011553112-0 100,000 Foothill Blvd -Install Master Plan Storm Drain, Multi-year construction - LOMR 10 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Ave -Stone Drain General Drainage 1112303565011810112-0 10,000 (Survey and Design). Related to Hemwsa Ave pavement rehabilitation Drainage Total: 110,000 11 Facilities 12 City Maintenance Yard ExpansionlRemodel 13 Fire District -Jersey Station (174) Training Facility (Design and Plan Review) 14 Household Hazardous Waste -Building/Site Relocation 15 Victoria Gardens Substation Interior Repair and Renovation 16 Miscellaneous 17 24th St at Deer Creek Channel -Bridge Repair 18 ADA Ramps at Various Locations 19 Arrow Route Utility Undergrounding -Bear Gulch PI to west of Archibald Ave 20 Base Line Rd Utility Undergrounding - Carnelian St to Vineyard St 21 Bus Stops -pads at various locations 22 Deer Creek Channel from Base Line Rd to Highland Ave - Bike Trail Improvement 23 Foothill Blvd at Middle Channel Day Wash -Bridge Repair (Construction FY13n4, possible grant funding) 24 Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel -Connection Capital Reserves 10250015650!1650025-0 677,230 Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011735288-0 500.000 Integ Waste Mgmt 11883135650!1525188-0 45.520 Law Enforcement Reserve 10177015650/1835017 40.000 Facilities Total: 1,262,750 General Drainage 1112303565011812112-0 75.000 Measure I 11773035650!1150177-0 100,000 Underground Utilities 1129303565011777129-0 719,360 Underground Utilities 1129303565011776129-0 554,570 Prop 42 1190303565011823190-D 100,000 Ped Grant Article 3 1214303565011823214-0 90,680 190.680 Beautification 1110316565011709110-0 49,000 Safe Rte To School Grant 12343035650!1709234-0 225.990 274.990 General Drainage t 112303565011809112-0 25.000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650!1827198-0 150,000 Ped Grant Article 3 12143035650!1827214-0 125.000 275,000 Miscellaneous Total: 2,214,800 P48 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2012!13 No. Project Fund Account Amount ISj 25 Municipal Utility -Electrical 26 Haven Ave from Jersey Blvd to 26th St -Electrical Relocation west side Municipal Utility 17053035650/1795705-0 60.000 Municipal Utility Total: 60,000 27 Parks 28 Central Park - Handscape 8 Landscape Improvement Park Development 1120305565011803120-0 50,000 29 Central Park -Pavilion Park Development 1120303565011834120-0 250,000 30 Golden Oak Park -ADA 8 CPSC Improvement Park Development 1720305565011832120-0 50,000 31 Mountain View Park -ADA 8 CPSC Improvement LMD 4R 11343035650/1833134-0 150,000 32 Southwest Cucamonga Park -New park Prop 84 State Grant 1235305565011754235-0 283,495 (Design and Environmental prior year expenditure, Construction FY 12!13) Parks Total: 783,495 33 Railroad Crossings 34 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur -New concrete panels Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1819174-0 75.000 Railroad Crossings Total: 75,000 P49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2012113 No. Project Fund Account 35 Streets 36 4th St from Milliken Ave to Richmond PI -north side Pavement Rehabilitation Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650!1817174-0 37 4th St from Ontario Mills Dr to Wineville Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation Prop 42 1190303565011822190-0 38 9th St north side from 100 feet west to 600 feet west of Vineyard Ave - Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650.!1808198-0 Sidewalk Safe Rte To School Grant 12343035650.!1808234-0 39 Archibald Ave from Hillside Rd to north city limit -Pavement Rehabilitation 4D Arrow Route from Etiwanda Ave to east city limit -Widening. Rehabilitation and Bridge Repair (Survey and Design, with Construction funded FY13l14) 41 Arrow Route from Vineyard Ave to Archibald Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation (Cal Recycle Grant attached) 42 Banyan Si from Etiwanda Ave to East Ave - Sidewalk and Pavement Rehabilitation 43 Base Line Rd - at I-15 Interchange (Complete PSBE and start Construction) 44 Carnelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave -Pavement RehabilitatOn (Survey and Design, with Construction funded FY13/14) 45 Etiwanda Ave north of Foothill Blvd -Rock Curb Replacement 46 Foothill Blvd across SCE Corridor west of Day Creek Channel -Sidewalk 47 Hellman Ave from Base Line Rd to 19th St -Pavement Rehabilitation (Survey and Design, with Construction funded FY13l14) 48 Hermosa Ave from Banyan St to Wilson Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation (Survey and Design). Related to Hermosa Storm Drain 49 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at various locations 50 Madrone Ave north of 9th St -Widening (Construction with Southwest Cucamonga Park) 51 Milliken Ave from Arcow Route to Base Line Rd -Pavement Rehabilitation (Note: Construction with Milliken Ave from Fairmont Wy to Route 210; Cal Recycle Grant attached) 52 Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to Route 210 -Pavement Rehabilitation (Note: Construction with Milliken Ave from Artow Route to Base Line Rd; Cal Recycle Grant attached) 53 Rochester Ave from Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd -Pavement Rehabilitation (Survey and Design, with Construction funded FY13/14) 54 Youngs Canyon from Koch PI to Cherty Ave -Street Extension (Environmental. Conceptual Design and Flood Control basins reviewlstudy) Measure 1 Measure I General Drainage Measure I Gas Tax RT7360 Prop 42 Transportation Unknown Measure I Gas Tax RT7360 Citywide Infrastructure Gas Tax RT7360 Gas Tax RT7360 Gas Tax RT7360 Proposition 1 B Gas Tax RT7360 Measure I Gas Tax 2105 AD 2000-02 Measure I Measure I Amount (5) 206.000 387,000 33,000 90.800 123, 800 550.000 10,000 5 000 15.000 380.000 200,000 210.000 410,000 100.000 35.919.181 36,019,181 10.000 130.000 145.000 10,000 10.000 850,000 125.300 975.300 127,200 48,000 500,000 401.355 949.355 350.000 510.000 AD 88-2 EtiwandaJHighlnd 1813303565011601813-0 50,000 11773035650!1727177-0 11773035650/1820177-0 11123035650!1811112-0 1177303565011796177-0 1174303565011737174-0 11903035650/1737190-0 1124303565011361124-0 xxxxxxxxxxx/1361xxx-0 1177303565011722177-0 11743035650!1685174-0 1198303565011826198-0 1174303565011816174-0 1174303565011815174-0 1174303565011022174-0 11943035650/1022194-0 11743035650!1818174-0 1177303565011797177-0 1170303565011797170-0 1656203565011797856-0 11773035650/1769177-0 117 7303565011821177-0 Streets Total: 41,357,836 iv P50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2012!13 No. Project Fund Account Amount (i) 55 Traffic 56 19th St -Replace Signal Cabinets at 7 locations Transportation 1124303565011792124-0 350.000 57 Accessible (Audible) Pedestrian Signals -Various Locations Transportation 11243035650/1828124-0 40.000 58 Traffic Management Center -Upgrade Citywide Transportation 1124303565011831124-0 200,000 Traffic Total: 590,000 59 Future 8 Unfunded Projects 60 Etrovanda Creek Park -Phase II 61 Fire District -Banyan Station (175) Expansion (Design and Plan Review) 62 Fire District -Central Station (178) 63 Fire District -Operations Building 64 Fire District -San Bemardino Station (172) Demolition and Relocation 65 Lemon Ave from Archibald Ave [o Haven Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation (Note: Concurrent with storm drain construction) 66 Lemon Ave from Haven Ave to 1300 feet west -Storm Drain (Note: Concurrent with pavement rehabilitation) 67 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements -west to east city limits 68 Red Hill Park -Pedestrian Paseo 69 Windrows Park -Fire Lane Repair 70 RDA Unfunded 71 Archibald Ave from Church St to Palo Alto St -Storm Drain 72 Arrow Route - at I-15 Interchange (EIR, Project Report, Right-0f-Way. Design and Construction) 73 Biane Library - 2nd Floor Rancho KIDS Project 74 Etiwanda Ave -Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks and Widening between 6th St and Arrow Route (Prelim Design Study) 75 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bemardino Rd -Widening with Median Island including Landscaped Median to Vineyard (Rightof-Way and Construction) Park Development 11203055650!1664120-0 5,28D.000 Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011779288-0 2,500.000 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650!1645288-0 8,000.000 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1392288-0 11,000,000 Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011733505-0 6.000,000 Gas Tax RT7360 11743035650/1793174-0 560,000 General Drainage 11123035650/1791112-0 1,700,000 Beautification 1110316565011775110-0 10,000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1775198-0 100.000 110,000 PD 85 Redemption 18483035650!1621848-0 100.000 Unknown Unknown 3D,000 Unfunded Total: 35.280,000 RDA -Tax Increment Fund 25008015650/1805500-0 1,215,000 RDA 2004 TAB 2660801565011360660-0 80,000.000 RDA 26308015650/xxxx630-0 4,900.000 Library Services Fund 13026015650/xxxx302-0 1.000.000 5,900.000 RDA -Tax Increment Fund 25008015650/1076500-0 2,000,000 Transportation 1 1 24 30356 50/1 1 891 2d-0 25000 Unknown xxxxxxxxxx/1189xxx-0 4.600.000 4.625.000 RDA Unfunded Total: 93,740,000 V P51 '► pro- r 1 j j i g r 11:1111 ! " h . "- Beautification Typical Beautification projects include parkway landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the rest of the City. The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation stan- dards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs. Beautification projects are typically funded via the Beautification Fund (110), which is a product of new residential and commercial development fees. Other examples of funding include Park Development, Capital Reserves and Park and Landscape Maintenance District funds. Sources of Funding for FY 2012-13 Project List& FY 2012-13 Expenditures I.Archibald Ave, north of Norbrook $10,000 $10.000 $26.850$10.000 Dr to Carrari St—Community Trail on west side 2. Haven Ave, 4th to 19th—Median $50,000 Island Retrofit 3. Haven Ave,Wilson Ave to $2,000 Vivienda St—Community Trail on west side 4. LMD I Trail—Concrete Drainage $14,850 Improvement 5. LMD 4R Improvements—Paseo $143,000 $573,000 Lighting Retrofits 6. LMD 4R Improvments—Water $400,000 Citywide Infrastructure 111 LMD 3B Conservation and Landscape Renovations Beautification LMD 4R Total $619,850 P52 Project Number: 800-2012-11 1L Key: 1830 Archibald Avenue Community Trail, north of Norbrook Drive to Carrari Street, west side Prolect Location: Archibald Ave - From north of Norbrook Dr to Hidden Farm Rd, west side Est. Construction Start/End: 2/2014 - 3/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David ~o~ ~~ ~~, ~RARI ST NORB~OK ~ ~~ "PROJECTS LOCATION~~ ~~ HILLSIDE RD ~~~ ILSON~VEJ~ WILSONfAVE~~~~ j~a Ir 0~ a;~°~ ~ G~~~ ~-~~~~ ~- ~~~~ ~ J'-'I In~ll ,~ ~ ! r,~~nnnnnnn~~ ~~ Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on Archibald Avenue including the installation of 2-rail PVC fence, installation of decomposed granite and installation of mow curbs. Justification: This stretch will connect to the existing community trail at the west side of Archibald Avenue, both to the north and south, as part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Archibald Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($( Expenditure/Cate~~orv Prior Vears 201213 201314 201415 201516 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $o $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 510,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-Of-Way 50 $0 $0 ~ $0 $0 50 $0 Construction 50 50 588,200 $0 50 $o $88,100 Inspection &Administration 50 $0 55,000 50 50 $0 55,000 Contingency $0 50 $9,600 $0 $0 $0 $9,800 TOtdl Dqsts: $0 $10,000 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Vears 201213 201314 201415 201516 201617 TOTAL Beautification Fund (130) 50 $10,000 50 $0 50 $o $10,000 Unfunded 50 So 5303,000 50 5o So 5103,000 Total Costs: 5o Slo,ooo $103,000 50 $0 50 5113,000 Impact on Operations: This stretch will add an additional quarter-mile to the City's tra il inventory, requiring trash removal, weed abatement, and ro utine maintenan ce. However, it will also remove 1,000 linear feet of City maintained public landscape saving the City approximately $1,100 year . Currently seeki ng grant funds for construction. 2 P53 Project Number: 800-2012-18 JLKey.1129 Hagen Avenue - 4th Street to 19th Street IVledian Island Retrofit Project Location: Haven Ave -From 4th St to 19th St Est. Construction Start/End 10/2013 - 2/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings N.T.S. Description: Replaces existing median turf with shrubs. Justification: To comply with the State's Woter Efficient Landscope Ordinance and to reduce maintenance-related costs and traffic impacts. Project Cost Estimate ($) Exoenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 550,000 50 50 50 50 550,000 Right-of-Way SO 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction $0 50 5900,000 50 50 50 5900,000 Inspection & Administration 50 50 510,000 50 50 50 510,000 Contingency $0 SD $90,000 $0 $D $0 $90,000 Total Costs: 50 550,000 $1,000,000 $D $0 50 $1,050,000 Project funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL LMD 4R (134) $0 530,000 50 50 50 50 530,000 LMD 38 (133) So 510,000 51,000,000 50 SD 50 51,DIQDDD Citywide Infrastructure Fund (198) 50 510,000 50 50 SD 50 510,000 Total Costs: 50 550,000 51,000,000 50 50 50 $1,050,000 Impact on Operations: Reduction in water consumption and maintenance costs. Reduction in maintenance activities will reduce traffic impacts from lane c losures required to perform rout ine maintenance. 3 P54 Project Number: 800-2012-OS JL Key: 1829 Haven Avenue Community Trail, Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street, west side Project Location: Haven Ave -From Wilson Ave to Vivienda St, west side Est. Construction Start/End: 2/Z013 - 3/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David ,~ PROJECT LOCATION `'~, W ~``~ ~C \` r. iii ~ 1i, ~`> =.~ _ Q I/ VIVIENDAST ~~--~ (i~~L ~~, ~ HILLSIDE RD ~' ~__ ~ ,. C ~ -~I_-rr~- ~ WILSONAVE .~ J ~ i~ ~ ~~ i ~~ V- r~ ~~ `~~~ J ~ ~-- ir ~~~~~~r ~ ii I ~~ - .I,n, ~ ~ ~1 '. f' Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on Haven Avenue, from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street west side, which includes the installation of 2-rail PVC fence, decomposed granite, and mow curbs. Just cation: This stretch will connect to the existing community trail along the west side of Haven Avenue as part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of Haven Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $2,000 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $o $o $o $0 $o Construction 50 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 Contingency $0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 Total Costs: $o $2,000 $as,o0o $o $o $o $so,ooo Project Funding: Fundin¢ Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 7 A Beautification Fund (110} $o $2,000 $D $0 $0 $o $2,000 Unfunded $0 $0 548,000 50 $0 $o $48,000 TOtaI COStS: $0 $2,000 $48,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: This stretch will add an additional quarter-mile to the City's [rail inventory. Trash removal, weed abatement, and routine maintenance will cost approximately nine cents per square fo ot of trail, equal ing approxim ately $1,100 per year. 4 P55 1L Key: 1551 LMD 1 Trail -Concrete Drainage Improvement Project Location: Various locations in LMD 1 Est. Construction Start/End: 10/2012 - 3/2013 Project Status: Construction Department: Public Works Project Manager: Steve Relph Description: Project includes the installation of water bars (per Standard Plan 81012} and the placement of concrete slabs on the community trails. In FY 11/12, 3001f of water bars (at 5 locations) and 150 sf of concrete slab (at 1 location) were installed. In FY 12/13, there will be approximately 1641f of water bars (at 3 locations) and 456 sf of concrete slab (at 1 location) installed. This is an approximate amount and will be adjusted depending on funding availability. Justification: This project will improve drainage, reducing runoff related damage to the community trails and improving public safety. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 2014 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $D $0 Right-of-Way $o $D $D $o $0 5D $D Construction $83,680 $14,850 $D $D $0 $0 $98,530 Inspection & Administration $0 $D $D 50 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $D $D $D $0 SO $0 TOtaI COStS: $83,680 $14,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,530 Project Funding: FundinASource Prior Years 2012 13 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015 2016 2016/2017 TOTAL Beautification Fund (110) $83,680 $14,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 598,530 TOtaICOStS: $83,680 $14,850 $0 $D $0 $0 $98,530 ImpaR on Operations: This project will reduce the ongoing maintenance cost of the community trail system caused by erosion 5 P56 JLKey:1716 LMD 4R Improvements - Paseo Lighting Retrofits Project Location: Landscape Maintenance District 4R -Terra Vista Est. Construction Start/End 09/2012 - 10/2012 Project Status: Design T PROJECT LOCATION Department: Public Works -Parks Project Manager: Chris Gilli Description: The project will install new paseo lights above grade throughout LMD 4R. Justification: The existing paseo lights are below grade and have significant damage due to corrosion to their bases. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 201213 2013 14 201415 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 $0 $D 50 50 SO Design/Plan Review $12,000 $0 $0 50 $0 50 512,000 Right-of-Way $D $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Construction $o $143,DOO $0 5a $0 50 $143,000 Inspection & Ad ministration $o $D $o $D $o $o $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 TOtaI COSts: $12,000 $143,000 $D $0 $0 $0 $155.000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL LMD 4R (134) $12,000 $143,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $155,000 Total Costs: $12,OOD $143,OD0 $0 $0 $D $0 $155,000 Impact on Operations: This project, when completed, will lower the failure rate of light poles thereby increas ing the duration of interval at which maintenance is required. The use of LEDs will also reduce current electric cons umption by half. 6 P57 Project Numher: 800-2012-33 1L Key: 1787 LMD 4R Improvements -Water Conservation and Landscape Renovation Study Project Location: ^ \ I Landscape Maintenance District 4R ~ I Est. Construction Start/End: 2/2013 - 5/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings -_ SCALE NONE PROJECT LOCATION Description: Project goal is to perform a water conservation study and develop an implemetation plan. Justification: The intent of the project is to develop a new landscape design that is aligned with the City's new water conservation criteria. Project Cost Estimate ($~: Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Right-of-Way $0 $0 50 $o So $o So Construction $0 $355,000 $p $0 $0 $0 $355,000 Inspection & Administration $o $10,000 So SO $0 $o $10,000 Contingency SO $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 Total Costs: $0 $aoo,0o0 $o So $0 $o $400.000 Project Funding: FundinRSource Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 201415 2015 16 201617 TOTAL LMD 4 (134) $D $400,000 $D $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Total Costs: $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Impact on Operations: This project will help to reduce the cost of landscape watering in the City 7 P58 Drainage projects include the construction of new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events. Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and weatherlemergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place. The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as needs dictate. Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas Tax. Project List & FY 2012-13 Expenditures I .Hellman Ave (Lower Reach) $100,000 Cucamonga Creek Channel to north of Foothill Blvd 2. Hermosa Ave, Alta Loma Basin $ 10,000 to Wilson Ave Storm Drain Total $ I 10,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2012- 13 $i General Drainage P59 Project Number: 800-2012-09 JL Key: 1553 Hellman Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain, Lower Reach, Phase 1 & 2 Project Location: Hellman Ave -From north of 6th St to 200 feet north of the R/R Est. Construction Start/End: s/zolz -12/2D1z Project5tatus: Construct ion/Close-Out Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David ~ SAN ,)3ERNARDINO RD ~ ~ r~ I. 66 ~ FOOTHILL BLVD j V i l~ ~ii ~~~I:-~-~~-L-s ~. ~~_-_ L_. _ _ _ -_ ~~ ARROW ROUTE ~, PROJECT LOCATION i -_ r 1i ~' ~ f I ~p ciTr I w~x~~~.,,~ ',~,~ raao STH STREET ~°,~ I ..~..... Y~, W . ._.. .. -- _ ui Sic ' w r a a' ar o ~ ~- W ~ _ ~ qrn. a r b,wu~ Description: Prepare application for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by a Letter of Map Revision (LOMB). Just'rfication: After the Hellman Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain Phase 1 and 2 projeR is completed, the City must apply to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) by a Letter of Map Revision (LOMB) to eliminate th e high flood insurance for all residents and businesses in the designated area. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 115 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 50 SO $0 50 Design/Plan Review $190,000 5100,000 SO 50 50 So 529o,0D0 Right-Of-Wdy $0 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 512,755,000 SO 50 $0 $0 $0 512,755,000 $0 $0 Inspection & Administration $634,700 50 $D $0 50 50 $634,700 Contingency 51,275,500 50 50 50 50 50 51,275,500 Total Costs: 514,ass,zoo $100,000 SD So So So 514,955,200 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Drainage GeneralFUnd (112) $1,500,000 $100,000 $0 50 SO 50 51,600,000 Citywide Infrastruture Fund (198) $6,000,000 50 50 50 $0 50 56,000,000 RDA Tax Increment Fund (SOD) 57,355,200 SD 50 50 So $0 57.355,200 Total Costs: 51a,855,200 51oo,ooD 50 5o So 50 51a,955,200 Impact on Operations: This application will save the residen ts and businesses money far the ir flood insurance. 9 P60 Project Number: 800-2012-28 JL Key: 1810 Hermosa Avenue -Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: ` I Hermosa Ave -From Alta Loma \\lJh Basin to Wilson Ave i Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2014 - 8/Z014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description - ~~ BANYAN ST r ,7 ~ L !; i +-- - J j ~. i- JLJ~-, ~~~~r~~~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ice, ~~~ - ~ ~~ i '~ ~, - r/_ I • ~~`~~ U '~= i _S ~~C ~?~' 2, ~r Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain; install catch basins and manholes. Justification: This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use, and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide better pedestrian access to the Hermosa I ntermediate Sch ool at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO SD $o So $0 50 50 Design/Plan Review SO $10,000 SO SO SO SO $10,000 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $o SO $o $0 $0 Con$trUCtipn $0 $0 $1,843,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,843,000 Inspection & Administration $0 5o 505.000 $0 $0 $o $05,000 Contingency $0 $0 5276,000 $0 $0 $0 $276,000 Total Costs: $0 $10,000 $2,164,000 $0 $0 50 $2,170,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Drainage General Fund (112) $o $10,000 Sz,16a,0o0 $o $o $o $z,17a,ooo Total Costs: $0 $10,000 52,160,000 50 $0 5o 5z,17a,ooo Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance, potholes, and sandbags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 10 P61 I I II II or III Facilities Projects that construct new buildings or that either improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory; however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the remodeling or restoration of existing facilities. The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or grant funding. Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead expenses and utilities. Project List & FY 20 12-13 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 20 12-13 I. City Yard Expansion $677,230 $40.000 $45.520 2. Fire District Jersey Station $500,000 (174)Training Facility $677,230 3. Household Hazardous Waste— $45,520 Building/Site Relocation 4.Victoria Gardens PD $40,000 $500.000 Substation Interior Repair and Renovation Total $1,262,750 Capital Reserves ■ Fire Capital Projects ■ Integrated Waste ■ Law Enforcement Reserves P62 JL Key: 1650 City Yard Expansion Project Location: OUNTRY Public Works Yard CLUB _ _ _ Est. Construction Start/End: 7/2011-11/2012 Project Status: Construction Department: Public Works Project Manager: Bill Wittkopf - - t 9~M ~~ _ ~~ , Description: Project will construct a new Public Works Administration building. The new facility will be approximately 23,000 square feet. Justification: Existing Public Works Building is deteriorated and lacks sufficient work space for necessary staffing levels. Project Cost Estimate (Sj Expenditure/CateKOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 50 Design/Plan Review 5840,295 50 $0 $o $0 50 5840,295 Right-of-way SD So So SD 5o So So Construction $9,069,782 $677,230 $0 50 50 50 59,747,012 Inspection & Administration 51,057,909 $D $0 $0 $0 50 51,057,909 Contingency $908,870 $D $0 $D $0 $0 $908,870 Total Costs: 511,876,856 5677,230 50 $0 50 $0 $12,554,086 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) 53,505,176 5677.230 $0 SD 50 50 54,182,406 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds (6601 58,371,680 50 50 50 $0 50 58,371,680 Total Costs: $11,876,856 $677,230 $0 SD $0 $0 $12,554,086 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to t he City's inventory resulting in ad ditional facilities maintenace, utilities and overhead expenses. The new maintenance cost will be offset by the energy and water efficient features incorporated into the new design (solar panels, use of drought tolerant landscaping). Any additional funding from "RDA" will depend on the RDA bond proceeds usage determination. 12 P63 JL Key: 1735 Fire District -Jersey Station (174) Training Facility Project Location: ~ _~ ~ ~ _ ___ ~ L) 1 IL_ Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) ,~ J I ~ 1 and the Fire Maintenance Facility - C1 fLL BL Ber- - on Jersey Blvd. - _, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~~ ~~-~~ ~ ~~ ~,~ Est. Construction Start/End: 2013/14-2014/2015 Project Status: Design Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: I Chief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane I~ Description: Design concepts only of a training facility for the Fire Protection District. Justification: A training facility has been included in the current and previous Strategic Plan and has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its inception. Several multi-story hotels have been constructed and additional mid-rise professional offices are proposed in the future necessitating this training tower. It will include expanded classrooms, a live burn building, multi-story training building and other props. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2 12 13 2013 14 2014 1 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 SD 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 5500,000 50 50 50 50 5500,000 Right-of-Way So SO 5o SD 5o SD SD Construction $0 $0 56,000,000 $0 50 $0 56,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 SO 50 $0 50 SO $0 Contingency $o SO 50 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: So $SOO,OOD 56,000,000 50 $D So 66,SDD,oDD Project Funding: FundineSource Prior Years 2 12 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) 50 $500,000 $6,OOO,OD0 50 SD 50 56,500,000 Total Costs: SD 5500,000 $6,000,000 50 SD 50 S6,SOO,OD0 Impact on Operations: Fire District operatio ns and mainte nance costs will i ncrease. The cost will be better determined aft er the design phase is complete. 13 P64 1L Key: 1525 Household Hazardous Waste -Building/Site Relocation Project Location: City Yard adjacent to west of Hellman Ave Est. Construction Start/End: 7/2011 -12/2012 Project Status: Construction Department: Engineering Services Project Manager: Linda Ceballos l ~ ~ ~ULJL_11 i ~U /~\~~~~ ~ ~ L FOUTl~9 66 I - - - _- _ __ _ _ ~ ~' wswsm ~~ ~ ~_ -, li %~ /~ ~' ti~ I ~ ~ i ~ ~ `~ i ~ i ~ ~ ,v, .~-~ . . _, ^ ~.. _~ I L ARK AFtFZ©W ~- W ~'~ ~` P JE~CT LOCATION ~ I~ " ~ ~~- i ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~~ -- i _ 1~ ~C ~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~ CITY ,~ i ' ~ ~ YARD CITY LIMITS - - - i"' - , I Description: The project will construct a permanent and enclosed household hazardous waste facility in conjunction with the new Public works Service Center Project (City Yard). This project is dependent on the construction of the Heilman Avenue Storm Drain in order to coordinate frontage improvements. Justification: The existing facility is located on the grounds of the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Yard. The new facility will improve customer service by reducing the incidences of severe weather closures, providing a workspace protected from weather conditions and providing adequate storage space for increased usage. The design and subsequent construction of this project is identified and prioritized as a 2009 City Council Goal. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cate¢orv Environmental/NPDES Design/Plan Review Right-of-Way Construction Inspection & Administration Contingency Total Costs Project Funding: Fundin~Source Integrated Waste Mgmt.(188j Prior Vears 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $125,237 SO SO SO SO SO $125,237 $0 $0 50 SO $0 $0 SO $1,700,000 $45,520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,745,520 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $317,000 $0 SO SO SO SO $317,000 $2,417,237 $45,520 $0 $0 SO 50 $2,462,757 Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL $2,a17,z37 S4sszo $o $0 50 $0 52,a6z,7s7 Total Costs: Impact on Operations: $2,417,237 $45,520 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,462,757 There will be minimal new maintenance casts related to operating the warehousetype building. The new maintenance costs will be offset by the energy and water efficient features incorporated into the new building design (solar panels, use of daylight, drought tolerant landscapingj. 14 P65 Project Number: JL Key: 1835 Victoria Gardens Substation Interior Repair and Renovation Project Location: 7743 Kew Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 11/2012 - 1/2012 Project Status: Design Department: Public works Services/Purchasing Project Manager: Ty Quaintance/Purchasing i ._~ :- ~_ ~ r ~~ ' ~ ~ i - - --, ~I! __ _ ~1 ~ ~_ - - ~,,, ~ j~[~ PR9JECT LOCATION ~ JI ~~I'f ; ' ~, / (!_ ~~' ~ ~ _ , .... ~ ~ - ail ~ ~~ ' ~ i ~7 l /, ~ -~ ~ .. _ -~ 'I - ~r i l _ , .m - ~~,.-.- ci` Ire ~ i _ / ~::^j l.. a ~ _~=~~ -- Description: This project will consist of removing all of the VCT flooring in the station and polishing the concrete floors, replacing the carpets in the offices, the existing Formica counter tops with Corian counters, installing rubber surface flooring in the armory and locker room as well as reconfiguring the reception area to better fit the needs of the station. Justification: The existing flooring in the Substation is in need of replacement due to cracks in the VCT and worn carpeting. In addition, the receptionist workstation will be reorganized to meet current ergonomic standards. Project Cost Estimate ($~: Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 So 50 So 50 50 Design/Plan Review 5o So So 50 50 5o So Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction So Sao,ooo So 50 So Sa Sao,ooo Inspection & Administration 50 50 5o So So So So Contingency 50 50 50 50 50 SO 50 Total Costs: 50 Sao,oOo 50 50 50 50 540,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Law Enforcement Reserves (017) $0 540,000 50 50 50 50 540,000 7otalCosts: So SaO,ooo So So So So Sao,oo0 Impact on Operations: This project addresses the existing worn/damaged conditions at the substation. There is no fiscal impact or savings associated with this project. 15 P66 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous projects are the capital undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other project categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors such as: - State or Federal Mandates - Community Health and Safety Issues - Council Goals and Priorities - Regional Needs Assessments - Interagency Agreements - External Funding Arrangements These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special funding sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund. Project List& FY 2012-13 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2012-13 I. 24th St at Deer Creek Channel $75,000 $1 50,000 (Bridge repair) 2.ADA ramps $100,000 $225,990 3.Arrow Route Utility $719,360 Underground $49,000 $1,273,930 4. Base Line Rd Utility Underground $554,570 $215,880 5. Bus ) Pads Stops $190,880 10000„9" (Pads) 6. Deer Creek Channel, Base Line $274,990 Rd to Highland Ave(Bike Trail) $100,000 7. Foothill Blvd at Middle Channel $25,000 $100.000 Day Wash (Bridge repair) $100,000 8. Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek $275,000 ■ Underground Utilities■ Measure"I" Channel (Connection) Total $2,214,800 l l General Drainage ■ Prop 42 ■ Ped Grant Article 3 ■ Beautification 16 ■Safe Rte to School ■ Citywide Infrastructure Grant P67 Project Number: 800-2012-32 1L Key: 1812 24th Street at Deer Creek Channel -Bridge Repair Project Location: 24th St at Deer Creek Channel Est. Construttion Start/End: 8/2012 - 9/2012 Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings J _f`-J~,J~~~L ARROW ROUTE 0~~~~ ~ ~- PROJECT LOCATION ~~I ~ ~~ ~~ j r JERSEY BLVD 24TH ST j ~- a > ~ ~ \• a a o ~ ~ m_ ~ = w V = (~ ¢ 6TH ST I -J _ ~, i w a z w sc a;~ ~...._ y J ~ s Description: This project upgrades the existing bridge guard rails to current standards. It also provides needed maintenance improvements due to age and weathering of the concrete deck with the application of a methacrylate crack seal. Justification: Caltrans b ridge inspection and the Cit y's consulting engineer (Aufbau Corp) have doc umented struct ural deficiencies n eeding repair and upgrades at this location. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 5o SO So 5o So Design/Plan Review SO 50 50 SO SO 50 SO Right-of-Way 50 5o So So 50 5o So Construction 50 $65,000 So SD So 5o S6s,ooo Inspection & Administration 50 53,500 50 SO 50 SO 53,500 Contingency 50 $6,500 50 SO 50 50 56,500 Total Costs: 50 575,000 50 SO 50 $0 55,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Drainage GeneralFUnd (112) 50 575,000 50 50 50 50 55,000 Total Costs: So 5~s,ooo So So So So S~s,ooo Impact on Operations: Reduced maintenance costs for repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas 17 P68 Project Number: 800-2010-14 JL Key: 1150 ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project Location: Various locations Citywide Est. Construction Start/End 4/2013 - 5/2013 Project Status: Design and Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings PROJECT LOCATION: CITY W I D E Description: Construct ADA-compliant ramps at various locations citywide. Locations for ramp installations come from the ADA Transition Plan, which is updated annually. This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues that cannot be incorporated into other improvement projects, but which must still be addressed in a timely fashion. Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and required by law. Project Cost Estimate (S)~ E~enditure/CateROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So SO 50 50 50 SO 50 Design/Plan Review Ss,aoo Ss,aoo Ss,aoo Ss,aoo Ss,aoo Ss,aoo 53z,aoo Right-of-Way SO 50 50 50 SO SO 50 Construction 586,000 586,000 586,000 $86,000 586,000 586,000 $516,000 Inspection & Administration 5o So So So So So So Contingency 58,600 58,600 58,6D0 58,600 58,600 58,600 551,600 Total Costs: 5100,000 Si00.D00 5100,000 5100,000 51D0,000 5100,000 5600,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL MeasurelFund(177j 5100,000 5100,000 51DD,OOD 5100,000 5100,000 5100,000 5600,000 Totaltosts: 5100,000 5100,000 51oo,000 51oo,ooo 5100,000 5100,000 5600,000 Impact on Operations: None. 18 P69 Project Number: 800-2010-12 1L Key: 1777 Arrow Route Utility Underground Project Location: Arrow Rte from Bear Gulch to west ~ of Archibald Ave ~ Est. Construction Start/End Unknown Project Status: Budget Department: ~~~~ ~ off, ' . _. Project Manager: \ _ ~~ _, Walt Stickney ~ Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Arrow Route from Bear Gulch to west of Archibald Avenue. Just'rfication: The removal of the overhead utilities by placing them underground improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. Project Cost Estimate ($j: Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAI Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $o $o $o $o $o Design/Plan Review $0 $15,000 $o $0 $o $0 $15,000 Right-of-Way SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $626,690 $0 $0 $0 $0 $626,690 Inspection & Administration $0 $15,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $62,670 $D $0 $0 $0 $62,670 TOtalCosts: $0 $719,360 $D $0 $0 $0 $719,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Vears 2 12 1 2013 14 2014 15 2 1 1 2016 17 T TAL Underground Utilities (129) $D $719,360 $D $0 $D $0 $719,360 Total COStS: $0 $719,360 $D $0 $D $0 $719,360 Impact on Operations: None 19 P70 Project Number: 800-2010-13 1L Key: 1776 Base Line Road Utility Underground ProjeR Location: ~ 19TH ST Base Line Rd from Carnelian St to ~- Vineyard St ~~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ Est. Construction Start/End 01/2013-06/2014 Project Status: Budget Department: Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: This project will underground a stretch of existing overhead utilities along Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Vineyard Street. lustffication: The removal of the overhead utilities by placing them underground improves the aesthetic appearance of the area. ProjeR Cost Estimate ($): Exoenditure/Catestorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $o $o $0 50 50 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-Way $o $o $o So $o So $o Construction $0 $481,420 $0 $0 $0 $0 $481,420 Inspection & Administration $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $15,000 Contingency $o $48,150 $0 $D $0 $0 548,150 Total Costs: 50 5554,57D 50 50 $0 $0 $554,570 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 12 13 2 13 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Underground Utilities (129) $o $554,570 So So So $o Sssa,57o Total COStS: $0 $554,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $554,570 Impact on Operations: None. 20 P71 Project Number: 800-2012-19 1L Key: 1823 Bus Stops/Pads -Various Locations Project Location: H ~ _ _ ~= (~l L ~- ~~ - ->~ -j 19th St, Banyan St., Victoria Park ~~ T I ! u~~ ~~~~ ~~ __ / Z (7 _ ~ ' ~ a Ln, Base Line Rd, Foothill Blvd, ~ r N. ~' ~ ° ~' ~~ ~ ~, ,, w I_ Arrow Rte, 4th St, & Vineyard Ave ~ r !fit i ~ ~ ~ w / o~, +.;~~`~ I ~ >I Est. Construction Start/End 9/2012 - 10/2012 Project Status: Design Department: ~ w Engineering 5 ~ ~ ~ x Project Manager: N.T.S. =1 ~ Curt Billings 1 -' Description: Constructs 53 bus pads at various locations throughout the City. lustiflication: Provides ADA improvements to existing public transportation stops that are currently used by over 300 riders each day. The improvements may increase ADA ridership, resulting in less vehicle trips and reduced CO2 emissions. Project Cost Estimate ($~ Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 SO 50 So So 50 50 Right-ot-Way 50 50 50 50 So $D 50 Construction $0 5v4,DDO 50 50 50 50 51~a,ooo Inspection & Administration So So 50 50 5o SO So Contingency So 516,s8o So So So 50 516,sso Total Costs: SO 5190,880 SO 50 50 SD 5190,880 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Prop 42 Fund (190) 50 5100,000 50 50 SO 50 5100,000 Ped Grant/Art3 Fund (214) 50 $9D,880 50 50 SO SO 590,880 Total Costs: 50 5190,880 50 50 SO 50 5190,880 Impact on Operations: None 21 P72 Project Number: 800-2009-19 JL Key: 1709 Deer Creek Channel, Base Line Road to Highland Avenue -Bike Trail Improvement Project Location: Deer Creek Channel from Base Line Rd to Highland Ave - Bike Trail Improvement Est. Construction Start/End 7/2012 - 8/2012 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings ~- 1 _ - PROJECT LOCATION - ---- - .~_I " _~ __ -' - - -- YY Y 7 W ~ Q z2 ~'-..~r W C ___ ~`~ f 2 W W U J m Y W U = U 4 W I -~~~ ¢ O w ~ I ~"=~~- Y VICTORIA ST p: } O U _ ., PACIFIC ELECT I~TRAIL ( I- ti I k ~ l- ~ C-'~ ra«~ BASE LINE RD Description: This project will upgrade the maintenance access road to a Class I Bike Trail and provide a connection at its intersection with the Pacific Electric Trail. Class I bike trail improvements include a paved pathway with signage and striping. Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route to school for either bicycling or walking because the school district has eliminated a portion of their bussing program. The City was awarded a Federal Safe Routes To School grant to fund 90Yo of the project's construction costs. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 SO 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 50 SO 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 5o SO 50 SO 50 50 50 Construction $0 5240,000 50 50 50 SO 5240.000 Inspection & Administration SO $10,990 50 $0 50 50 530,990 Contingency 50 524,000 50 50 50 50 Sza,ooo Total Costs: 50 5274,990 SO 50 50 50 5274,990 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Beautification Fund (110) SO 549,000 50 50 50 50 549.000 Safe ROUte To SCh001 Grant (234} $0 5225,990 SO 50 $0 $0 5225,990 TOtaI COStS: 50 5274,990 50 50 50 $0 5274,990 Impact on Operations: None 22 P73 Project Number: 800-2012-32 JL Key: 1809 Foothill Boulevard at Middle Channel Day Wash -Bridge Repair Project Location: Foothill Blvd at Middle Channel Day Wash Est. Construction Start/End 4/2014 - 7/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings BASE LINE RD j ~' -I , CHURCH ST ~ i ~ ~ a~ I ui ~~~~ ~ 'a ~'` PROJECT L~CA ON w m w U ~ III o m =7;~ ~ w E~~ ~ FOOTHILL BLVD T ~ ~11J j ~i SCPLE NONE (J J a / i o ~/ o LJ a a w F w 1 ARROW ROUTE I Description: Project will place two HDPE storm drain pipes within an existing double box culvert, pressure grout the annular space and reconstruct the inlet and outlet ends tojoin the existing trapezoidal channel to the double HDPE storm drains. Construction may be reimbursable by Caltrans' Highway Bridge Rehab and Replacement Program (HBRRP). Justification: Caltrans and Aufbau Corp (City's consulting engineer) inspections recommend structural bridge repairs at this location. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateROry Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 525,000 525,000 50 SO 50 550,000 Right-of-Way 50 SO 50 50 SO 50 50 Construction 50 $0 5150,000 50 50 50 5150,D00 Inspection & Administration 50 50 510,000 5o So So 510,000 Contingency 50 50 515,000 50 50 50 515,ooD Total Costs: So Szs,ooo Szoo,oo0 5o So So Szzs,o0o Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Drainage General Fund (112) 50 525,000 So So So 50 5zs,ooo Unfunded 50 5o S2oo,o0o So 5o So 5200,000 TotalCosjs: 50 $25,000 5200,000 50 50 50 5225,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street and bridge maintenance costs for repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 23 P74 Project Number: JL Key: 1827 Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel -Connection Project Location: Pacific Electric Trail at Day Creek Channel Est. Construction Start/End: 04/2013 - 07/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description J _ / 1 .s. Ai[7 q~r€- I- - t I ~~~-J~ luI - Ir C~~-~ MENYON ~I ~~ l__J U r' PAq ~ _ _- 1 UII - - ~ ~~ i Il~~\/ 1 ~~~tOR~A ,,~~ RL~JECT LOCA1~f1 ~9 `~l ,_ ~C ~~ ~ NORO ARK e~ ap ~'J' ~ sl ~ ~D U f t ~~/, ~I ~~ f ~ ~~ ~ ' ' t ~ - ~ _ I L~'~ '~%I ~ ~j ~ , I ~ L~_ _ ~ n _ - _ ~ ~ ~ . - ~ ~-~J_ I N ~ f lif~] << ~ The project will connect the Pacific Electric Trail with the Day Creek Channel path. Justification: The City and County have worked out an agreement which will permit the pedestrian use of the Day Creek Channel maintenance road. This project will tie the chan nel into the existi ng Pacific Electric Trail. Project Cost Estimate ISI~ Exoenditure/Cate¢orv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 SD 50 So So So 50 Design/Plan Review 50 55,000 SO 50 50 50 55,000 Right-of-way So 50 5o So So So 50 Construction 50 5270,000 50 50 50 50 5270,000 Inspection & Administration 50 50 50 So 50 5o So Contingency 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Total[osts: 50 5275,000 50 50 50 50 5275,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Citywidelnfrastructurej198) So Stso,OOo So So So So 5tso,ooo TDA 3 (214) 50 5125,000 SO 50 50 50 5125,000 Total[osts: 50 5275,000 50 50 50 50 5275,000 Impact on Operations: Maintenance will be minimal. The connection will be a durable surface such as concrete which will require sweeping. 24 P75 The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) was formed by the City Council in 2001 in response to the California Energy Crisis of 2000-2001. RCMU served its first customers in 2003 and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substation in 2004. Currently, RCMU services approximately 500 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 72,000 megawatt-hours of elettricity are distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 201 I. territory. RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system. RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability of service. Project List & FY 201 I-12 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 201 I-12 I. Haven Ave RCMU Electrical- $60,000 Jersey to 26th Total $60,000 Municipal Utility (705) 60,000 P76 Project Number: 500-2012-23 JL Key: 1795 Haven Avenue RCMU Electrical -Jersey Avenue to 26th Street Project location: Haven Ave -From Jersey Ave to 26th St Est. Construction Start/End 6/2013 Project Status: Design JERSEY BLVD Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings ~~' w /j' N.T.S. Z Description: Relocate RCMU public utilities from private property to the public right-of-way. Justification: Eliminates a pubic utility encroachment upon private property. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 50 $0 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 50 50 50 50 50 SO Right-ot-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 Ssa,ooo So So So So 554,000 Inspection & Administration 5o So So 5o So So So Contingency 50 56,000 50 50 50 50 56,000 Total Costs: 50 560.000 50 50 50 50 560.000 Project Funding:. Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T T L Municipal Utility j705) 50 560,000 50 50 50 50 560,000 Total Costs: 50 560,000 50 50 50 50 560,000 Impact on Operations: None 26 P77 Any capital project that is located in, on, or adjacent to a park or community center facility is classified as a Park Project. These include the construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park landscaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements. Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed on an annual or bi-annual basis due to extensive wear from local league play. The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund (I 20), which is collected via residential development fees (i.e. new single family, town home, condo and senior housing). Some projects qualify for grants and Special District funds. This past year the City successfully secured $3,941, 136 in Proposition 84 grant funding to develop a new park in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. City staff spent many weeks collaborating with residents of the neighborhood on the design of the proposed park. Sustainable features, such as edible and drought tolerant landscaping, were incorporated into the design. Project List & FY 20 12- 13 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 20 12- 13 .Central Park Hardscape & Land- $50,000 scape Improvements 2. Central Park Pavillion $250,000 3. Golden Oak Park-ADA &CPSC $50,000 Improvement 4. Mountain View Park-ADA & $150,000 CPSC Improvement 5. Southwest Cucamonga Park $283,495 Total $783,495 $283,49 $I '.350,000 Park Development ^ LMD 4R ^ Prop 84 State Granc P78 JL Key: 1803 Central Park Hardscape and Landscape Improvements Project Location: _ 11200 Base Line Rd ~ _ _ ----- - r - __ _-~, -. LOCA Est. Construction Start/End 8/2012 - 10/2012 ProjeR Status: L~~% ~ Design/Construction ~' C E N l~ R A L 7~`-- jI~ PARK ® ~\L~`'. Department: ~,~ i ~` i~ ~u ~~ Community Services/Parks \ (- J (~,~ z Project Manager: ~ ~ ~ Karen McGuire-Emery ~ - - Description: This project will modify hardscape and landscape at Central park on the north side of the building. Justification: This project is necessary to repair and replace improvements at Central Park. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 SO 50 50 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 5o So 50 Construction 525,000 550,000 50 SO 50 50 575,000 Inspection & Administration 50 50 50 50 50 50 So Contingency 50 SO 50 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: S~s,ooo 550,000 50 50 50 50 575,000 Project Funding: funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 ZO15 16 2016 17 TOTAL Park Development (120) 55,000 550,000 50 SO S0 $0 575,000 Total Costs: 55,000 550,000 50 50 50 50 575,000 Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions as needed 28 P79 1L Key: 1834 Central Park Pavilion Project Project Location: _ ______ 11200 Base Line Rd -~==y -= - ~ - -__-_ -__~ Est. Construction Start/End: 10/2012 - 1/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Karen McGuire-Emery Description: This project will provide a covered picnic shelter for individual and group events. Justification: Funding provided by the County of San Bernardino for amulti-purpose activity pavilion and staging area for the Pacific Electric Trail. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 SD $0 50 50 50 SO Design/Plan Review 50 50 50 50 50 50 SO Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 5250,000 50 50 50 50 5250,000 Inspection & Administration 50 5o SD SO SO 50 50 Contingency SO 50 SO 50 SO 50 SO Total COStS: 50 5250,000 50 50 50 $D 5250,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T T Park Development (120) 50 525D,000 SD 50 5o SO Szso,0oo Total Costs: 5D Szso,ooo So So 5o So Szso,ooo Impact on Operations: This project will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions as needed. 29 P80 JL Key: 1832 Golden Oak Park Playground - ADA &CPSC Improvements Project Location: 9345 Golden Oak Rd Est. [onstruction Start/End 1/2013 - 2/2013 Project Status: Construction Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Karen McGuire-Emery ~. N. .S. ARROW. RT. .~I .. --.~ <;; ILA .1. c >~ ~Q v> - ~ n _ -- o AR _ ~. - 7 z PROJECT LOCATION ' y ,1 ~ ~` g -- ' W > ~ w Q <~ W , N r ui Q d - 6TH ST. a O 2 S x Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment at Golden Oak Park to comply with current Consumer Produ[ts Safety Commission (CPSC) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADAj Standards. Justification: This project will improve accessibility and safety and bring park equipment up to current standards. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 5o So 5o So 50 So 50 Right-of-Way So So 50 50 So 50 So Construction $0 $50,000 50 50 50 50 550,000 Inspection & Administration $0 SO 50 5o SO 50 50 Contingency 50 SO SO SO 50 So $o Total Costs: So Sso,ooo So So So So Sso,ooo Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Park Development (120j 50 55D,000 50 50 50 50 550,000 Total Costs: 50 550,000 50 50 5o SO 550,000 Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment 30 P81 JL Key: 1833 Mountain View Park Playground -ADA &CPSC Improvements Project Location: `~-~ 11701 Terra Vista Parkway _~ _, ~ r ~"6, '~'~~ ~ ~,u ~ ' r: - ry m~ ,~ _ r Est. Construction Start/End: 11/2012 - 1/2013 Project Status Construction Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Karen McGuire-Emery C L N 7 R A 1 P A R K Description: This project includes the installation of new playground equipment at Mountain View Park to comply with current Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards. Justification: This project will improve a[cessibility and safety and bring park equipment up to current standards. Project Cost Estimate (5) Expenditure/Catezorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 SO 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Right-of-way So So 5o So So 50 5o Construction Sa 5150,000 So 50 5o So 5150,000 Inspection & Administration 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency 50 50 50 50 5a 50 50 Total Costs: So 51so,ooo 5o So 5o 50 5150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T T L LMD 4R (134) 50 $150,000 50 $0 50 50 5150,000 Total Costs: So 5150,000 So So 50 50 5150,000 Impact on Operations: This project reduces the amount of maintenance performed on playground equipment 31 P82 JL Key: 1754 Prop 84 -Southwest Cucamonga Park Project Location: c ~ ~ l _~ ~ ~J ~ _ East side of Madrone Ave between J~ ~// ( ~ ~ ~~ Arrow Rte and 9th St 66 Est. Construction Start/End 6/2013 - 6/2014 Project Status: Preliminary Grant Awarded 11/1/2010 Full Grant Expenditure on Hold Pending Property Transfer From RDASA Department: Community Services Project Manager: I \\ Karen McGuire-Emery `?~ Description: The City was awarded $3,941,136 to design and construct a 3.4 acre neighborhood park for the local residents in Southwest Cucamonga. Justification: No other neighborhood park within a 1/2 mile radius. Park will serve low income neighborhood. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $2,282 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,282 Design/Grant Prep $67,772 $283,495 $0 $0 $0 $0 $351,267 Right-of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $3,469,907 $0 $0 $0 $3,469,907 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $165,180 $0 $0 $0 $165,180 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $70,054 $283,495 $3,635,087 $0 $0 $0 $3,988,636 Project Funding: FundinRSource Prior Years 201213 2013 14 201415 2015 16 T TAL Park Development (120j $47,500 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $47,500 Prop 84 State Grant (235) $22,554 $283,495 $3,635,087 $0 $0 $0 $3,941,136 Total Costs: $70,054 $283,495 $3,635,087 $0 $D $0 $3,988,636 Impact on Operations: This project will provide a new neighborhood park and will require park maintena nce such as mowing and cleaning of bathrooms, as well a s maintenance of all other amenities and landscape irrigation. It will increase operational and maintenance costs by about $60,000 per year. 32 P83 roadCross Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and infrequent projecu, requiring large funding commitmenu, lengthy construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possibility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents. Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SAN BAG and Caltrans. The Haven Avenue Grade Separation is the City's newest grade separated railroad crossing. This project took almost eight years to move through design, acquire the appropriate right-of-ways, relocate utilities, accumulate the necessary funds, and to construct. This year, a more immediate project to be constructed will be the new concrete panels at the Arrow Route Railroad tracks. Project List & FY 2012-13 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2012-13 I .Arrow Rte at Railroad Spur-new $75.000 concrete panels Total $75,000 $75,000 Gas Tax RT7360 P84 Project Number: 800-2012-04 JL Key: 1819 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur, new concrete panels Project Location: Arrow Rte at Railroad Spur, west of Milliken Ave Est. Construction Start/End: 5/2013 - 7/2013 Project Status: Design/Constructior Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description Justification: i i P FOOTHILL BLVD _+T' 66 - o a ~ PROJECT LOCATION Y ~ _ uWW~ WZ ~ SPORTS U > COMPLEX r 2 ~ ~ ARROW ROUTE ~- _ - li~l.~ I~I ~ z ~~° s~ 1 ~ JERSEY BLVD ~ ' I ~~ RAIL ROAD -c? -_ - - - ii Replace existing uneven rubber panels with concrete panels. The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic use; replacing with concrete panels will provide a smoother ride and safety far the vehicles. Project Cost Estimate (5) Expenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 510,000 50 50 50 50 510,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 SO SO 50 Construction SO 550,000 50 50 $0 50 550,000 Inspection & Administration 50 510,000 50 So 50 So 510,000 Contingency 50 55,000 50 50 50 50 Ss,OOo Total Costs: So S~s,ooo So So So So 5~s,ooo Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund(17a) 50 S~s,ooo SD 50 50 So S~s,ooo Total Costs: 50 S~s,ooo 50 5o So 50 57s,ooo Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber pan els create damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement. This project will reduce maintenance for asphalt replaceme nt, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas . 34 P85 s r • . 0 •. I. IMO, � ,I . a7 1 m " Streets ' '. Streets projects are the most common type of project undertaken by the City. The City receives annual funding from gasoline sales taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and resi- dential streets in order to extend pavement life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening and Project List & FY 20 12-13 Expenditures extension projects as need dictates via new development, community I. 4th St, Milliken Ave to $206,000 needs and the City's Richmond PI—Pavement Rehab Project List & FY 2012-13 Expenditures General Plan. 2. 4th St, Ontario Mills Dr to $387,000 17. Milliken Ave, Fairmont Way to $350.000 Wineville Ave—Pavement Rte 210—Pavement Rehab Rehab 18. Rochester Ave, Foothill Blvd to $510.000 3. 9th St, Vineyard Ave— $123,800 Base Line Rd—Pavement Rehab Sidewalk 19. Youngs Canyon, Koch PI to $50,000 4. Archibald Ave, Hillside Rd to $550.000 Cherry Ave—Street Extension north city limit— Pavement Rehab Total $41,357,836 5. Arrow Rte, Etiwanda Ave to east $15,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2012-13 city limit—Widening, Rehab and Bridge Repair $90,800 1.533.200 $401,355 $50.000$ $597.000 6. Arrow Rte, Vineyard Ave to $380,000 $500,000 1 1,858,000$5 Archibald Ave—Pavement Rehab 000 $125,300 $100.000 7. Banyan St, Etiwanda to East $410,000 $178,000 Ave—Pavement Rehab $35,919,181 8. Base Line Rd at I-15 Interchange $36,019,181 9. Carnelian St, Lemon Ave to $10,000 Wilson Ave—Pavement Rehab 10. Etiwanda Ave, north of Foothill $130,000 Blvd—Rock Curb Replacement I I. Foothill Blvd, across SCE $145,000 corridor west of Day Creek Channel—Sidewalk n Gas Tax RT7360 AD 2000-02 12. Hellman Ave. Base Line Rd to $10.000 19th St—Pavement Rehab ■ Prop 42 Unknown 13. Hermosa Ave, Banyan St to $10,000 Wit son Ave—Pavement Rehab ■ Measure 1 (177) Prop I B 14. Local Street Pavement Rehab— $975,300 Citywide Infrastructure Gas Tax 2105 Various Locations 15. Madrone Ave, north of 9th St— $127,200 General Drainage ■ Safe Rte to School Widening Grant 16. Milliken Ave,Arrow Rte to Base $949,355 Transportation E AD 88-2 Line Rd—Pavement Rehab P86 Project Number: 800-2012-02 JL Key: 1817 4th Street, Milliken Avenue to Richmond Place, Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 4th St - From Milliken Ave to Richmond PI Est, Construction Start/End: 8/2012 - 9/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David JERSEY BLVD ~+ `C3`~ ' ~' _.____...__ ~I , `i~ 6TH ST '~I _ Q Wz m~ Y ~ U o ~~ I ~ 0_ m Qj ~ 4TH ST m - PROJECT LOCATION Description: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 $0 50 Design/Plan Review 50 58,000 50 50 50 50 5$,000 Right-of-Way SD 50 50 50 50 S0 50 Construction 50 $170,000 50 50 50 50 5170,000 Inspection & Administration 50 511,000 50 50 50 50 $11.000 Contingency 50 517,000 50 So 50 50 517,000 Total Costs: So Szo6,ooo So So So 50 5zo6,oo0 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174) $0 5206,000 50 50 50 $0 5206,000 Total Costs: $0 $206,000 $0 50 50 50 5206,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street mai ntenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus free ing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 36 P87 Project Number: 800-2012-42 1L Key: 1822 4th Street, Ontario Mills Drive to Wineville Ave, Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 4th Street - From Ontario Mills Drive to Wineville Ave Est. Construction Start/End 8/2012 - 9/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David JERSEY BLVD ~~/ f~ , ,__ - '~ 6TH ST ~, _ ~ ~ ~ o a ~ a ~ °~ ~ ~ a ~, = o o U ~ ~ ~ a a u. a ~~ z 4TH ST m PROJECT LOCATION Description: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project will be coordinated with the City of Ontario through a Cooperative Agreement. Justification: Will enhance the traffic circulation and pedestrian safety within the area, due to smoother ride. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 Right-of-Way $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Construction $0 $310,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $310,000 Inspection & Administration $0 520,000 SO $0 $D $0 $2D,000 Contingency $0 531,D00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000 Total Costs: $0 $387,D00 $0 $D $0 $0 $387,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 7 TAL Prop 42 Fund (190) $0 $387,D0o $0 $D $0 $0 $387,ODo TOtaI COStS: $0 $387,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $387,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street mai ntenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 37 P88 Project Number: 800.2012-20 1L Key: 1808 9th Street, north side, west of Vineyard Avenue -Sidewalk Project Location: 9th St, north side, From 100 feet west of Vineyard Ave. to 800 feet west of Vineyard Ave. Est. Construction Start/End 12/2012 - 1/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Q (ARROW ROUTE ~ ¢ a ¢ ARROW ROUTE ARROW ROUTE ~ ~i m J l a <„ _,~_~ ~ Z 9TH ST = 9TH ST o S C17 U ~~ YARD __ 8 TH ST ~ 8TH ST PROJECT LOCATION ~ J W W _ ¢ 6TH ST OAK m U ~d N.T.S. 4 TH ST Description: Project to construct 700 feet of sidewalk on the north side of 9th Street. Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route to school for either bicycling or walking because the school district has eliminated a portion of their bussing program. The City was awarded a Federal Safe Routes To School grant to fund 75q of the construction costs. Funding becomes available in FY 2012/2013, beginning October 1, 2012. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOry Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SD 50 50 50 SO 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 SO 50 50 So Construction So Silo,aoo SO So 50 50 5110,800 Inspection & Ad ministration 50 50 50 So 50 50 50 Contingen[y 50 513,000 50 50 50 SO 513,000 TOtaI COStS: 50 $123,80D 50 50 50 50 5123,800 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Citywidelnfrastructure~198) 50 533,000 50 So SD 50 533,OD0 Safe Route School Fund~234) 50 590,S0o 50 50 50 So S9o,600 Total Costs: 50 5123,800 50 50 50 50 5123,800 Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs 38 P89 Project Number: 800-2012-03 JL Key: 1727 Archibald Avenue, Hillside Road to north city limit, Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: Archibald Ave -From Hillside Rd t0 north city limit Est. Construction Start/End: 3/2013 - 5/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David \. PROJECT LOCATION CITY LIMIT ., ~~ ~ Q III` 11 l!, ~ ¢ ~ ~ ~ JI z ~ I~ ~~ ~i _ HILLSIDE RD ~ 1I_ ~f I _ ~1~-~' l _Irf q~ ((J // ~~ WILSON AVE _ _ J w x Description: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 201213 2013 14 2014 15 201516 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO 50 Design/Plan Review $0 515,000 50 $0 50 50 $15,000 Right-of-Way 5o So 5o SO 50 5o So Construction $0 5450,000 50 SO 50 50 5450,000 Inspection & Administration 50 540,000 So 50 50 50 540,000 Contingency 50 $45,000 50 50 50 50 $45,000 Total Costs: 50 5550.000 50 So 50 So 5550,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $0 5550,000 50 50 50 50 5550,000 Total Costs: 50 5550,000 So So 5o So $sso,oo0 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 39 P90 Project Number: 800-2012-14 JL Key: 182D and 1811 Arrow Route from Etiwanda to east city limits, Widening, Rehabilitation and Bridge Repair Project Location: Arrow Rte From Etiwanda Ave to east city limits Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2014 - 9/2014 Project Status: Design Survey Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description I ~ ~ / ~ I ~ i (,~ _~. ~ FOOTHILL BLVD .~- a= ~ uWl a ( ~ D i a Q I > FONTANA ~/_ O I r ARROW ROUTE I / I _ __ _ _ PROJECT ~- _ , ~ I LOCATION J -_ 6TH ST U This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO 50 SO 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review SO 515,000 50 50 50 50 S15,D00 Right-of-Way So SO 50 So 50 So 50 Construction 50 50 $418,500 SO SD 50 5418,500 Inspection & Administration 50 50 55,000 50 50 50 55,000 Contingency 50 50 $46,500 50 50 50 546,500 Total Costs: 50 515,000 5470,000 50 50 50 5485,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) 50 510,000 5250,000 50 50 SD Sz60,oo0 Drainage General Fund (11Z) 50 55,000 5220,D00 50 SO So 5225,000 Total Costs: 50 515,000 5470,000 So 50 50 5485,000 Impact an Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 40 P91 Project Number: 800-2012-27 JL Key: 1796 Arrow Route -Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Arrow Rte -From Vineyard Ave to Archibald Ave Est. Construction Start/End: 10/2012 - 11/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings J I / FOOTHILL BLVD I - III s's F _. '~ !' ~s z a i `? i ~1 9 U _ ARROW ROUTE ~` -' - E ti`-SAS . --~~ - ~ ~~r i i _ 9TH ST. ~ - _._ il PROJECT 8TH ST. I 'P w ~ ui w > p ~\ ~ m ~ U =ca~E ~~,c,~.E w Q 2 Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project utilizes asphalt-recycled rubber hot mix which entitles it to a Cal Recycle rebate in the amount of $57,600. It will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Catetzorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAl Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 $o Design/Plan Review 520,000 50 50 50 50 50 520,000 Right-of-way $o So $o $o So So So COnsiruCtion $0 $335,000 $0 $0 50 $0 5335,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $10,OD0 50 50 $0 50 510,000 Contingency $0 535,000 50 50 $0 50 $35,000 TOtaI CO5t5: 520,000 $380,000 50 50 50 $0 5400,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $20,000 $380,000 50 $0 $0 50 $400,000 TOtaI CO5t5: $20,000 $380,000 $0 $D 50 $0 5400,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 41 P92 Project Number: 800-2012-OS JL Key: 1737 Banyan Street, Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue, Pavement Rehabilitation and Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: Banyan St -From Etiwanda Ave to East Ave Est. Construction Start/End: s/zolz - 1o/2o1z Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David I WILSON AVE __. p, I PROJECT LOCATION ~`~ I I ETIWANDA I CREEK PARK ~ BANYAN ST ~~ _ ~ :~ i , m r a I w = '' o v~~ ~3 ~1 ~~ ~ ~ 3 o ~~- ~ ~ - z f-- z.~ ~~ tr ~~ _ 3 _ ~ VICTORIA ST ~ l Description: This project will restore the existing road surface to substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project will also a construct sidewalk to close a gap between existing sections of the sidewalk. Justification: The new sidewalk will enhance pedestrian safety and traffic circulation within the area. Project will also restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($~: Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 50 50 SO 50 50 Design/Plan Review 515,000 $10,000 50 $0 $D 50 525,000 Right-of-Way So 50 SD 50 $o $D 50 Construction $0 $350,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $350,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $15,000 5o SD 50 50 515,000 Contingency $0 $35,000 $0 50 50 50 $35,000 Total Costs: 515,000 Salo,DDO So 5D SD SD $azs,ooo Project Funding FundinP Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174) $0 5200,000 $D $o $o $o $200,000 Prop 42 Fund (190) $15,000 $210,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $010,000 50 50 $D 50 5025,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. This project will also reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 3B. 42 P93 Project Number: 800-2007-21 1L Key: 1361 Base Line Road and I-15 Interchange Project Location: ..~~- ! i '; - ~'' Base Line Rd a[ the I-15 Freeway ~~ -~~ ~ ~~ Est. Construction Start/End: Z/2013-8/2014 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney LOCATIO Description: Construction of a modification to the on and off ramps for the I-15 freeway at Base Line Road. lust'rfication: Due to the current and projected congestion of the streets around the interchange, it is necessary to improve access to and from the 1- 15 freeway at Base Line Road. Some of the project costs are eligible for reimbursement through Federal funds and Measure "I". Project Cost Estimate ($) Exoenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2 13 14 2 14 1 2 1 1 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $1,065,033 $0 $0 $o $o $0 $1,065,033 Design/Plan Review $4,576,400 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,576,400 Right-Of-Way $6,396,387 $894,200 $0 $D $0 $0 $7,290,587 Construction $0 $29,766,933 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $29,966,933 Inspection & Administration $0 $5,358,048 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,358,048 Contingency $o $o $o $o $o $o SO Total Costs: $12,D37,820 $36,019,181 $200,000 $0 $0 $D $48,257,001 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Transportation (124) $898,571 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $998,571 RDA (660) $11,116,482 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $11,116,482 Unknown $35,919,181 $20o,D00 $0 $0 $0 $36,119,181 GeneralFUnd (001) $18,996 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,996 RDA (650) $3,771 $o $0 $o $o $0 53,771 Total COSts: $12,037,820 $36,019,181 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $48,257,001 Impact on Operations: City is expected to take over mainten ance of the landscaping within the interchange. Area of landscaping has not yet been determined. 43 P94 Project Number: 800-2009-32 1L Key: 1722 Carnelian Street, Lemon Avenue to Wilson Avenue -Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Carnelian St from Lemon Ave to Wilson Ave Est. Construction Start/End 8/2013-9/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Englneering Project Manager: Curt Billings 1C1LJ ~ v IJi~`~c ~ l i r PR ECT LOCATION ~L ~° °~ ~;° ~ ~_~~~ I ~~S`~ HILLSIDErRD 1 ~JUL.~.^ ~! Jar-~ ~~ ~ !-~ ~ = -, r- ~~{{~~ ~~11\ ~ {~ XERIT.~GE 7 ~~JLJIJ/a~ LJL J~ OMMUHIi I ~~ ~ _ 1- ~ ,,,, ~~ LWLIJSON A t ~`~~ ~ w -z ~Gm~ '~ _..~JI_!I~!LJtJ~1L-~~U Jl._.,,_BA%YAN,~'I<J~. ~. ~ _~IJ~ ~_ C~i~ilC ~nJ 1~C~ RJ~'1 ~', _, , ~__ P ~ ~~, ¶ ALTA LOMA ~ ~ ~~1~~ ~// LEM ON AVE~ Ljl JR wGn I ~ ~ 7 I t ( ~~~ ~ ~ R fl i(~f q~1L~L~17L~7L i~~J ~i ~ 1~~~~I-,~f 1~1~I~n~ Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and Striping. justification: This project will restore the existing road to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cate¢orv Prior Years 201213 201314 201415 201516 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDE6 $0 50 50 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $10,000 50 $0 $0 50 510,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0 $0 .5435,000 Inspection&Administration $0 50 $10,000 50 50 So Slo,oo0 Contingency So So $4s,ooo 50 $0 50 545,000 Total Costs: $0 510,000 5490,000 50 50 50 Ss00,o00 ProjeR Funding: Fundine Source Prior Vears 201213 20]314 201415 201516 201617 T TAL Measure I Fund (177) $0 $10,000 $490,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Total COSTS: $0 $10,000 $490,000 $D $0 50 5500,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 44 P95 Project Number: H00-2012-06 1L Key: 1685 Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, curb replacement, various locations Project Location: Etiwanda Ave -north of Foothill Blvd, various locations Est. Construction Start/End 1/2013 - 3/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David U BANYAN ST ~. ll`,, J`,~ o a ~ { \ g - ~~i f w 2 ~ f ~. } U a ~ C VICTORIA 5T PROJECT LOCATION ~ ji P.E. TRAIL ~ I BASE LINE. RD ~ / i~ ~' ,,r/. . .~ Description: This project will install new cobblestone curb to replace the old cobblestone curb at various locations between Base Line Road and Wilson Avenue. Justification: This project will restore the aging cobblestone curb to the new cobblestone curb standard extending the life. Project Cost Estimate ($I Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 So So 50 So 50 Design/Plan Review 50 Ss,ooo 50 So 50 SO Ss,ooo Right-of-way So So 50 50 So So So Construction 50 5100,000 50 50 50 SO 5100,000 Inspection & Administration So S1z,o0o 50 50 50 $0 512,000 Contingency 5o Sio,ooo So SO 5o So Sio,oo0 Total Costs: $0 $130,000 SO 50 50 SO 5130,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174j SO 5130,000 50 SO 50 SO 5130,000 Total Costs: 50 5130,000 SO 50 50 SO 5130,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance cost for cobblestone curb repairs, thu s freeing up mai ntenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 45 P96 Project Number: 800-2012-07 JL Key: 1826 Foothill Boulevard, SCE Corridor west of Day Creek Channel, Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: Foothill Blvd -SCE Corridor west of Day Creek Channel Est. Construction Start/End: 11/2012 - 12/2012 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description Justification: CHURCH ST \. ~ 1~.7 'c/j/rli~l `L~ a ~ ~ ~' I ~~ ~ ~~-- = O O~ 6 6 ~ ~~ `i1 ~' _-- ~' ADULT SPORTS PROJECT LOCATION W COMPLE Q ~ , This project will install 600-feet of sidewalk to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk on both sides of Foothill Boulevard. This project was requested by handicap residents using this route everyday. The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation, as well as bringing the area into ADA compliance. Project Cost Estimate (51 Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 SO 50 SO 50 50 Design/Plan Review $o $10,000 $0 50 SO SO 510,000 Right•of-way 50 So So So SD SD SD Construction 50 5110,D00 SO SO 50 50 5110,000 Inspection & Administration 50 S1a,000 50 SO 50 SD 514,000 Contingency So 511,000 SD So SD SD 511,000 Total Costs: SO $145,000 SD SO 50 SD 5145,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure Fund (198) So S1a5,D00 SD SD So 50 $145,000 Total Costs: 50 51a5,000 50 SD SD 50 S1a5,00o Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs from General Fund and LMD 36 46 P97 Project Number: 800-2012-12 1L Key: 1816 Hellman Avenue, Base Line Road to 19th Street, Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Hellman Ave -From Base Line Rd to 19th St Est. Construction Start/End: 9/2013 - 11/2013 Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description ALTA LOMA JR. HIGH a ~~ ~~ ~ ~ i II ~'~ ~~d BERVLPARK iii ~._ _~~ ~-- _ _ tsTH sT PROJECT LOCATION __ ~ F W ~ I ~ a, -J m /. ~1,~ ~ ~ ~ x ~` -- = I;~ _ PACIFICEL.ECTRICTRAI_ ~~~~ r~ ~V ~~ I ~ ~.: BASE LINE RD ~, _ J~'~ ;L-`~~ i RED - 1 ~ n ~I, ~ -. HILL CO MU ITY ARK This project involves cold planning and Iocali2ed asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Exoenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 510,000 50 50 So So 510,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction $0 $D 5306,000 50 50 50 5306,000 Inspection & Administration 50 50 510,000 50 $0 50 510,000 Contingency 50 50 534,000 50 50 50 534,000 Total Costs: 50 510,000 5350,000 50 50 SO 5360,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174) SO SlD,DOO 5350,000 50 50 50 5360,000 Total Costs: 50 510,000 5350,000 50 50 50 5360,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 47 P98 Project Number: 80D-2012-29 JL Key: 1815 Hermosa Avenue -Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: Hermosa Ave -From Banyan St to Wilson Ave Est. Construction Start/End 9/2014-10/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings ~~~ Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. (Note: Project follows storm drain construction.) Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cvst Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 510,000 50 50 50 50 510,000 Right-of-way 5o So So 50 5o So 50 Construction 50 50 50 5164,000 50 SO 5164,000 Inspection & Administration 5o So So 510,000 5o So 510,000 Contingency 50 50 SO 516,000 50 50 516,000 Total Costs: 50 510,D00 50 5190,000 SO 50 $200,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 (174) 50 510,000 50 5190,000 50 50 5200,000 Total Costs: 50 510,000 50 5190,000 50 50 5200,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street mai ntenance costs f or pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenan ce crews to attend to other needed areas. 48 P99 Project Number: 800-2012-SO 1L Key: 1022 Local Street FY 12-13, Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Various Locations Est. Construction Start/End 9/2012 - 10/2012 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves either a slurry seal or asphalt overlay. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 S0 SO 50 50 $o $o Design/Plan Review SO 520,000 So 50 SD So Szo,ooo Right-of-way So So So So So 50 50 Construction So 5800,000 5o So 50 So Saoo,ooo Inspection & Administration So 575,300 So So So 50 575,300 Contingency 50 580,000 50 50 SD 50 580,000 Total Costs: SD 5975,300 50 50 50 50 5975,300 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174) 50 5850,000 SO 50 50 50 5850,000 Prop 1B Fund (194) 50 51zs,3oo 5o S0 50 50 5125,300 TOtaI COStS: 50 5975,300 50 50 50 50 5975,300 Impact on Operations: Reduced street mainte nance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 49 P100 Project Number: 800-2D12-30 JL Key: 1818 Madrone Avenue -north of 9th Street, Street Widening Project Location: Madrone Ave -north of 9th St Est. Construction Start/End 2/2013 - 3/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings 6 ~6 j f.: I~- a I~~~fiftlfl~!~ II ll J / IlJ ~ Q Q l(j y ARROW RTE. PRO~CT LOCATION ~ ~, I ~~~ Y Q , ~ ~; m ~~ ~~~ 9TH ST '"''~''~I'~' 8TH 5T _._ _- -W - ~ w II a ~ ~ z ~ U ~~ w a 0 Description: This project adds 320 linear feet of street widening and 3 street lights along the frontage of the new Southwest Park that will be constructed concurrently. Justification: This project will provide ADA acces sibility and improve pedestrian and vehicle safety along the street f rontage of the new Southwest Park. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 SO 50 Design/Plan Review SO 53,000 50 50 SO 50 53,000 Right-of-Way 5o So 50 50 50 50 50 Construction $0 5111,200 50 SO 50 50 5111,200 Inspection & Administration 50 $0 $D 50 50 SO 50 Contingency 50 513,000 50 $0 $D $0 513,000 Total Costs: 5o Stz7,zoo 50 50 So So Stz7,zoo Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 (174) 50 5127,200 50 SO 50 50 St27,z00 Total Costs: 50 5127,200 50 50 50 SO 5127,200 Impact on Operations: This project adds 3 street lights to Street light Maintenance districts SLD2 and SLD6 50 P101 Project Number: 800-2012-25 1L Key: 1797 Milliken Avenue -Arrow Route to Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Milliken Ave -From Arrow Rte to Base Line Rd Est. Construction Start/End 8/2012 - 9/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager. ~ nr~nwv n~~ie ~{ ~ ~ I_~;%/ Curt Billings (~~ Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project utilizes asphalt-recycled rubber hot mix which entitles it to a Cal Recycle rebate in the amount of 5192,000. This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Catettory Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $o $0 $o $o $o $15,000 Right•of-Way 50 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $840,355 50 $0 $0 50 5840,355 Inspection & Administration $0 510,000 SO $0 $0 50 $10,000 Contingency $0 $99,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $949,355 $0 $0 $0 $0 $964,355 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $15,000 $48,000 So $0 50 $0 $63,000 Gas Tax 2105(170) $o $500,000 $0 50 $0 $o $500,000 AD 2000-02(856) $0 $401,355 50 50 50 50 5401,355 TOtaI COStS: 515,000 $949,355 50 $0 $0 $0 $964.355 Impact on Operations: Reduced street mai ntenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 51 P102 Project Number: 800-2010-18 JL Key: 1769 Milliken Avenue, Fairmont Way to Route 210 -Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: Milliken Ave, Fairmont Way to Route 210 Est. Construction Start/End s/zolz - 9/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings _ _ - Q ~ _~-, ~ 1 ~~-~~~ ,.-__~. _ - w ~' Y''' PROJECT LOCATION Q _.~ ~'~ 2 ;•°° VICTORIA PARK LN N.T.S. pNT ,;WAY ~~ .. _._` FA1RM .:~~ ,1 ~i C a PACIFICI ELECTRI ~ '- C F.NTRAL ~ !Q - r a R I+ BASE LINE RD Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($~ Expenditure/Catezorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2D15 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $16,000 $o $D $0 $0 $0 515,000 Right•of-Way $D $0 $0 SO $0 $0 $D Construction $0 $309,000 $0 50 SO $0 $309,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $10,000 $0 $D $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $31,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $31,000 TOtalCosts: $15,D00 $350,000 $0 $0 $D $0 $365,000 Project Funding: FundinQSource Prior Years 201213 2013 14 201415 2015 16 201617 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $15,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $D $0 $365,D00 Total Costs: $15,D00 $360,OOD $D $0 $0 $0 $365,D00 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 52 P103 Project Number: 800-2012-26 JL Key: 1821 Rochester Avenue -Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: Rochester Ave -From Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd Est. Construction Start/End 10/2013 - 11/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings ~s ; ~/ BASE LINE RD %~ ~, i 11 _ _ _ _ ~' ~ l~ ~ ~~c ~~ - ~ ~ - ~ I - CHURCH 5T ~ ~~ ~ I ~/~: -- ~ scR~e NoNe ~~~ L PROJE'~:T ~ _---- i j'i LQCATION , o ~1 i J Y r~11 ul / FOOTHILL BLVD Ifl - -~-nY .,. (~ - ~ /// > ~ ~ ~~®%" ~ ~ ~ ui a z ~ ARROW ROUTE Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CdteROrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 50 510,000 50 $0 $0 SO 510,000 Right-of-Way So 5o So So So So 50 Construction 50 5450,000 50 50 50 50 5450,000 Inspection & Administration 50 510,000 50 50 50 SO 510,000 Contingency So Sao,oOO So So 50 50 540,000 Total Costs: 50 5510,000 $0 So So 50 Ss10,o00 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) 50 5510,000 50 50 50 50 5510,000 Total Costs: 50 5510,000 So 50 So So 5sio,ooo Impact on Operations: Reduced street mai ntenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and cra ck seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 53 P104 Project Number: 800-2012-Z2 1L Key: 1601 Youngs Canyon Road -Extension from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue Project location: Youngs Canyon Rd -Koch PI to Cherry Ave Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2014 - 9/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4-lane road across a flood control basin and connect to Cherry Avenue. Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will provide a secondary access to development west of Cherry Avenue and an easterly extension of Banyan Street which connects to Youn gs Canyon Road to the west. It will also relieve tr affic congestion on Wilson Avenue to the north. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/CateROrv Prior Years 201213 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SD 50 51D0,000 $0 50 50 5100,000 Design/Plan Review $50,000 550,000 550,000 5D 50 SO 5150,000 Right-of-Way SO 50 5525,000 SO 50 SD 5525,000 Construction 50 50 5600,000 5o SD 50 5600,000 Inspection & Administration SO 50 525,000 50 50 50 525,000 Contingency 50 50 5100,000 50 50 50 5100,000 Total Costs: 55D,DOD 550,000 5t,4DD,DDD SD 50 SD 51,5DD,DDD Project Funding Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAl AD 88-Z Etiw/Highlnd Imprv (813) 550,000 550,000 51,400,000 50 50 50 51,500,000 Total Costs: 550,000 55D,ooD Sl,aoo,oo0 50 SD 50 Si,soD,DOo Impact on Operations: Adds 1,000 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program. A more detailed cost estimate will be available after the design phase is complete. 54 P105 Traffi Projects included in this section are typically those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State and local design standards. Many of these projects include new signals, upgrades to intersections -such as additional turn pockets or signal timing upgrades - as well as synchronization and coordination projects that promote traffic flows along the City's heaviest traveled arterial streets. Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds (I 24), Measure I (177), Gas Tax Funds (170, 172, and 174), Street Lighting Districts and some grant funding. Project List & FY 2012-13 Expenditures Sources of Funding for FY 2012- 13 I. 19th Sc, Cabinet Replacement $350,000 2. Accessible (Audible) Pedestrian $40,000 Signals 3. Traffic Management Center $200,000 Citywide Total $590,000 $590,000 Transportation P106 Project Number: 800-2012-15 JL Key: 1792 19th Street Traffic Signal Controller Replacement Project Project Location: 19th St at the intersections of Sapphire St, Beryl St, Hellman Ave, Amethyst Ave, and Hermosa Ave. Highland Ave at the intersections of Carnelian St and Archibald Ave. Est. Construction Start/End: 7/2012-5/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Craig Cruz Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, replacing existing traffic signal controllers and cabinets and installing radios at 7 intersections. Justification: The existing controllers are more than 30 years old and are not compatible with the City's existing master control system. Replacement of the existing controllers and cabinets is necessary for communications with the City's master control system. The installation of radios will allow the signals on 19th Street to be coordinated for improved traffic flow. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500 Right-of-Way $o $o $o $o $o $o $o Construction $0 $290,000 $0 50 $0 50 $290,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $20,500 $0 50 $0 $0 $20,500 Contingency $o $29,000 $0 $0 $o $o $29,000 Total Costs: $0 5350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Project Funding: Fundin¢ Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Transportation (124) $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Total Costs: $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $350,000 Impact on Operations: The existing signal controller equipment and cabinets are over 30 years old. The constant exposure to extreme heat, cold, and moisture creates wear on electronic equipment increasing maintenance costs. These new controllers will provide more flexibility in addressing increasing traffic demands through more complex signal timing and coordination strategies and reduce maintenance costs. 56 P107 Project Number: 800-2012-16 1L Key: 1828 Accessible (Audible) Pedestrian Signals Project at Various Locations Project Location: _ ~' PACIFIC ELECTRIC ~RAII Foothill Blvd at the intersections of Baker Ave, Highridge PI, and BASE UNE RD RASE uNE RD Vineyard Ave. ~ ~ - P5~ / Base Line Rd at Milliken Ave. REO PROJECT ' Est. Construction Start/End: I 5/2013 - 6/2013 Project Status: Design/Construction ~ a 6 Department: Engineering Project Manager: , Craig Cruz ~ Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing accessible (audible) pedestrian signals on existing pedestrian signal heads. Justification: To improve the safety of visually impaired residents that cross the street for access to and from nearby businesses, shopping and restaurants, transit facilities, and recreation venues (e.g. the Pacific Electric Trail). Project Cost Estimate ($) Exoenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 50 $D $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review So Sl,zoo So So So So Sl,zoo Right-of-Way So So So So 50 So So Construction SO 533,000 SO SD 50 50 533,000 Inspection & Administration SO 52,500 50 So SO SO 52,500 Contingency 50 53,300 50 50 50 SO $3,300 Total Costs: SO 540,D00 50 50 50 50 540,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Transportation~124) 50 540,000 50 50 50 50 540,000 Total Costs: So Sao,ooo So So So So Sao,ooo Impact on Operations: The accessible (aud ible) pedestrian signals will need to be checked periodically to determine if they are functioning properly. 57 P108 Project Number: 800-2012-17 JL Key: 1831 Traffic Management Center Upgrade Project Citywide Project Location: Citywide CHURCH ST BLVD Est. Construction Start/End: 12/2013 - 6/2Di3 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering ROUTE JERSEY BLVD Project Manager: Craig Cruz Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, upgrading system software, educating staff with operations and maintenance of the traffic management center, troubleshooting and upgrading traffic signals that are not communicating with the traffic management center. Justification: The project will upgrade communications to enable better monitoring, re-timing, and coordination of the City's traffic signals for improved traffic flow and safety. Project Cost Estimate ($( Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Consultant Services 50 $a0,0oo 50 So $0 $0 $ao,o0o Staff Training $0 $12,000 So SO SO SO $12,000 Design/Equipment Specifications $D $16,o0D $0 $0 5D SO S16,000 Procurement/Construction $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $D 50 $110,000 System Testing and Integration $D $16,000 $0 So $o SO $16,000 Contingency So $6,000 $o $o SO $0 56,000 Total Costs: $0 $200,000 $0 50 $D SO $200,000 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Transportation (124) $D $200,000 So $0 $D $0 $200,000 Total Costs: So $200,000 $o So So $o $200,000 Impact on Operations: The traffic manage ment center will i mprove maintenance staff efficienci es and reduce related costs. T hese system upgrades will provide substantial improvements in system-wide signal timing and coordination, improving operational efficiencies, while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 58 P109 • law w`. - 1r-: • X' Future & Unfunded Projects included in this section are those that have been identified as being a priority project, but lack dedicated funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Projects designated as 'Unfunded' could be waiting on grant approval, or perhaps until new special fund monies become available. Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. In many cases funds can be found for the capital construction of a project like a new library or community center, but City management has not yet devised a way to fund the necessary staff or overhead expenses required to run a new facility. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2012/13 budget for either of these reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section. Project List & Future Expenditures I. Etiwanda Creek Park—Phase II $5,280,000 2. Fire District—Banyan Station $2,500,000 Potential Future Sources of Funding Expansion $1,700,000 3. Fire District—Central Station $8,000.000 $560,000 $10,000 $5,280,000 4. Fire District—Operations $11,000,000 Building 5. Fire District-San Bernardino $6,000,000 $100.000 Station $100,000 $30,000 6. Lemon Ave,Archibald Ave to $560,000 Haven Ave—Pavement Rehab 7. Lemon Ave, Haven Ave to 1300 1,700,000 feet west—Storm Drain 8. Pacific Electric Trail $110,000 Enhancments—West to East $27,500,000 City Limits 9. Red Hill Park—Pedestrian $100,000 Paseo Fire Capital Beautification 10.Windrows Park—Fire Lane $30,000 ■Gas Tax RT7360 ■ General Drainage Repair ■ Park Development Citywide Infrastructure Total $35,280,000 59 ■ PD 85 Redemption Unknown P110 Etiwanda Creek Park -Phase II 1L Key: 1664 Project Location: 5939 East Ave Est. Construction Start/End: - ~~ PROJECT L CATION (~ J'I ~j Unknown , - ~ ETIWANOA ETIWANDA ELEMEhTART CREEK PARK ~-~ Pf0)eCL Status: TERMEf]I/T - ~ // JR HIGH Design ~ - - - --~. ~ . i Department: ~r Community Services/Parks~I r ~® L ~I I ~~' - - - - - Project Manager: ~ ,;- ~ - '- --f- ~~~~ _ - KarenMcGuire-Emery ~nr1,' I '~~' 1 ~ ~~ `I~ i ~ ~~~ ~' -~-'~ „~ Description: This project involves the construction of additional athletic fields which include multi-use recreation fields, tennis courts, a "wet" play area, a 10,000 - 15,000 sq.ft. community building, storage/maintenance facility and additional parking. Justffication: The City Council identified this project as a goal for FY2007/2008. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 Design/Plan Review $159,230 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $159,230 Right-of-Way SD $D SD $o $D $D SD Construction $0 $0 $0 $D $6,280,000 $0 $5,280,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $D $D $0 $D $o Contingency $o $o $D $o So $D $o Total COStS: $159,230 $0 50 $0 55,280,000 $D $5,439,230 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2011 12 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TOTAL Park Development (120) $159,230 $0 $0 $0 $5,280,000 50 $S,a39,230 TOtaI COStS: $159,230 $0 $0 $0 $5,280,000 $D $5,439,230 Impact on Operations: Completion of this project will add a new facility to the City's inventory which will require operational expenditures for maintenance, staffing, overhead and utilities. Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two additional fields at $300,000 - $450,000 per year. 60 P111 1L Key: 1779 Fire District -Banyan Station (175) Expansion Project Location: 11108 Banyan St. -north side of Banyan St. Est. Construction Start/End: 2015/2D16-2016/2017 Project Status: Design pending - project on hold Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Mike Bell/Pamela Pane -- ~ ~_ ~L ~ ~ ~~ ~ f~ N}}~ ~ ~ I~~ i' - ~ ~ - ~~ ROJECT ., ~ ~ L CATION ~~ CHAFFEY COLLEGE ~I ~J~ ~ IZZLY DR - -'~~> ~ LOS OSOS ~~; HIGH SCHOO T BANYAN ~ (- ~UI_~ ~ ~, ~' ~~ _ LEMENTA \ ~, ~, - ~ ~ r] 0 ~ ~_,( ~~~ "' 1~ ' '~' `< ~ ~ ~p,t) - ~ (~ ~~ O 1 ND A ~ ~.. ~> / n ~ i Description: Expansion of the existing facility to accommodate additional services operating out of that facility, primarily apparatus storage. Justification: The Banyan Station houses specialized service resources that are currently parked outside and subject to wear from the elements. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 SO $0 $0 $0 50 50 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Right-of-Way $o SO $o $0 $0 $o $0 Construction $0 50 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $2,000,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 50 $0 50 50 50 Contingency $o $o $o $0 SO $0 50 Total Costs: 50 50 5500,000 $0 52,D00,000 $0 $2,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $0 50 5500,000 $0 $2,000,000 50 $2,s00,oo0 Total Costs: $0 $0 $500,000 50 $2,000,000 $0 $2,500,000 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs. Slightly increased operations and maintenance costs for utilities due to increased square footage. 61 P112 Project Number: 1L Key: 1645 Fire District -Central Station (178) ~- Plc~cer c c ro~C - ,T,rp Project Location: i ~ - -- Within the bounds of south of Base Line, north of Foothill, east of ~~ I I '~~ P :~ R K ~} L~-I S' ~ ~fo~L Haven and west of Milliken N.--TLL~~s. _ _ JLJ 1 Chest Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Design/Choose New Location Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Mike Bell/Pamela Pane PROJECT Description: New Fire Station construction. New property for this station is being identified. 1ust~cation: New Fire Station was recommended in the Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan. This station will serve the center of the Rancho Cucamonga community, providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. Project Cost Estimate ISj Expenditure/CateKOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 SO 50 50 SO So Design/Plan Review 50 $0 $0 50 $0 50 50 Right-of-Way $0 50 So So 50 So $o Construction 50 50 50 SO $0 $8,000,000 $8,000,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $0 50 $D 50 50 50 Contingency SO SD SD 50 50 50 50 Total Costs: So 50 50 So 50 SB,ooo,000 58,000,000 Project Funding: Fundin~Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBD T TAL Fire Capital Projects (288j So So 50 So 50 Ss,ooo,ooo Ss,ooo,o00 Total Costs: 50 50 50 50 50 58,000,000 58,000,000 Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will be $1.8-2.0 Million depending on the station size and staffing costs. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. 62 P113 JL Key: 1392 Fire District -Operations Building Project Location: Northwest corner of Civic Center Dr and Utica Ave Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Re-design pending Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Mike Bell _~ Q Z LLi - - > GNVR~ S3- -- _ - Q z j PROJECT LOCATION -- FOOTHILL BL. - -lee O. ~ ` - ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ C' CENTER DR. Q ~-=_ _ ARRdW HWY. - ~j I ~ ~ L- .'J.t ~__ ~ ~ ~ ~ JERSEY BL. - -, Description: This project will construct a building to house Fire District Headquarters personnel and a possible dispatch center. Justification: fire District Administration personnel have outgrown the current area in the Civic Center building. Anew facility was recommended in the 2005 Strategic Plan to consolidate Fire Adm inistration func tions. There may be a future need to add a dispatch center. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 201213 2013 14 201415 2015 16 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Right-of-Way SO SO So 50 $D So So Construction $o So So 50 $10,000,000 So $10,000,000 Inspection & Administration $D $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 50 $D $o $0 $0 $o Total Costs: $D $0 $D 51,000,000 $10,000,000 $0 $11,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Fire Capital Projects (288) SD SO $o $1,000,000 $10,000,000 50 511,000,000 Total Costs: $0 50 $0 $1,000,000 $10,000,000 50 $11,000,000 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and mainten ance costs will i ncrease with inc reased square footage, but will be unknown until final design is complete. 63 P114 JL Key: 1733 Fire District -San Bernardino Station (172) Demolition and Relocation Project Location: South side of San Bernardino Rd, west of Klusman Ave Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: On Hold Department: fire Protection District Project Manager: Mike Bell/Pamela Pane _~_ a .T.S. ~ CHURCH ST Q- ~f-- ~ iI Q W I I CO Q Q ~~ I` '! ~ lrr~~~ I I I I, J W S rr 'c (..) Q gEFFEN Sr - EFFEN ST ~ W ~:~ Q O ¢ ,' DORSET 5T w SAN BERNARDINO RD. ~~ ~ ~ STAFFORDST ~ _ Y ~ ~~-; FOOTHILL ~L DD\\ ~6.6r~ a ~nv=_ "s HAMPSHIRE ST a ~ PROJECT LOCATION Z w - Q x ~ oEVau sT` -~ U l~~ ~~, J I! O KONOCTI ST = ,w,a. .- ___ -- ~I - ~GAI~E VEJAR ,.. ARROW ROUTE Description: Construction to relocate and rebuild the fire station. Alternate locations are being explored, if none are found, station will be rebuilt at San Bernardino Road location. Project placed on hold pending the completion of other higher priority capital projects. Justification: The Fire District's 2005 Strategic Plan recommended the 55-year old fire station be rebuilt. This station serves southwestern portion of the Rancho Cucamonga community, providing the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $D $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $0 50 $0 $D 50 $0 Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 50 $0 50 50 $6,D00,000 56,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 50 50 50 $o $o SD Contingency $o $0 $D $0 $D 50 SD Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $6,DOO,OOD 56,000,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital PfOjeCtS(288) $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 56,000,000 Total Costs: $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 56,000,000 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs - current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new station when complete. 64 P115 Project Number: 800-2012-24 1L Key: 1793 Lemon Avenue -Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Lemon Ave -From Archibald Ave to Haven Ave Est. Construction Start/End: 03/2014 - 04/2014 Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings N.T.R. P~~ i ~ PROJECT LOCATION ~rt ~ ~~ -_, LEMON ST t r iii _ ~ ,, ~_ - - ~~ - ~: 19TH ST ,,G;., w - ~~ J m m o ~ < ~.s~ ~~l / ~ ~ w _ ~' oericir ci crTOir ton.. Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay and striping. Note: Construct after storm drain. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use, and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES SO $0 SO $0 SO $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $o $o $o $o $o $10,000 Right-of-Way $o $o So $o So So $0 Construction SO $0 $500,000 $0 50 $0 $500,000 Inspection & Administration SO $D $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $50,000 $D $0 $D $50,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $o $560,000 $0 SO 50 $50,000 Project Funding: Fundinx Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Prop 42 Fund (190) $10,000 50 50 50 50 $0 510,000 Gas Tax RT7360 (174) $0 SO 5560,000 50 50 50 5560,000 Total Costs: 510,000 $0 $560,000 $o $o $o $s~o,ooo Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and cra ck seal, thus freeing up maintena nce crews to attend to other needed areas. 65 P116 Project Number: 800-2011-OS 1L Key: 1791 Lemon Avenue -Haven Avenue to 1300 feet west, Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: Lemon Ave, Haven Ave to 1300 feet west Est. Construction Start/End 10/2013 - 03/2014 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings `~ HILLSIDE RD Z __ ~i. WILSON AVE ~ _ - -- Q I a ~: ~ _ PROJECT LO ATIO ~1 U I 2 BANYAN ST ~ - - r,' z LEMON AVE ~-- Y J J ---- -- ----= _ _ t --~-- - - -- - - _ - ---- ~ i Description: Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion. Just--rfication: This project will improve drainage in the area. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAI Environmental/NPDES 50 SO SO 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review 52,000 SO SD SO 50 50 52.000 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 5o So Construction So So Si,szo,ooa So So 50 51,szo,ooo Inspection & Administration So SO 510,000 SO So So Sio,ooo Contingency 50 SO 5170,000 50 50 50 5170,000 Total Costs: 52,000 50 51,700,000 50 50 50 51,702,000 Project Funding: FundineSource Prior Years 2012 13 201314 20141 2015 16 201617 TAL Drainage General Fund (112) 52,000 50 51,700,000 50 50 50 51,702,000 Total Costs: Sz,ooo So 51,700,000 So 50 50 51,702,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 66 P117 JL Key: 1775 Pacific Electric Trail Enhancements -All Phases Project Location: Pacific Electric Trail from west city limits to east city limits Est. Construction Start/End 9/2013 - 12/2013 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Walt Stickney ;;,: ~ - ¢ 1 .. ~,- /~ ~. ~ / `. . . .. D B6 , _ P OJ 10 ~ Description: Addition of various amenities along the trail. These amenities consist of replacing plaques and signs. Justification: The trail from the west to east end was constructed in different phases, at different times and by different contractors. Issues have come up during the course of the last couple years by users of the trail and have prompted the need for this enhancement. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/CateQOrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2D14 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Environmental/NPDES 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Design/Plan Review SO 50 50 50 50 50 50 Right-of-Way 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Construction 50 50 5110,000 50 SO 50 5110,000 Inspection & Administration SO 50 50 SO SO 50 50 Contingency 5o So So So So So So Total Costs: So 50 5110,000 5o So 50 5110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Beautification (110) SO 50 S10,D00 50 50 50 510,000 Citywidelnfrastructure Fund (198) 50 50 5100,000 50 50 So 5100,000 Total Costs: So So 5110,000 50 5o So 5110,000 Impact on Operations: Minimal impact on operations 67 P118 Project Number: 800-2008-22 JL Key: 1621 Red Hill Park -Pedestrian Paseo Project Location: z a Southwest corner of Red Hill Park - d w' between Red Hill Park and n~` W I ~ ~ Carnelian Ave. ^~-T-S- 1 ~ Z _ _i~-~~ ~~---~ ~ dBASE LI Est. Construction Start/End 08/2012 - 11/2012 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: i~(, 1 ~ ^-' WaltStickneY / 1~ ~'~°"-dlil 1 ? ~ - Description: Construction of a concrete trail and the installation of trail lights. Approximately eight different brands of solar lighting will be installed to evaluate which performs the most efficiently. Justification: Adds pedestrian access to Red Hill Park from Carnelian Avenue and energy efficient lighting. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $15,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 515,000 Right-of-Way $0 50 $0 $o $0 $o $0 Construction $0 SD 5100,000 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $o $0 Contingency $o $o $o $0 $0 $o $0 Total Costs: $15,000 $o $1oD,ooo $o $o $D $115,000 Project funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL PD-85 Redemption (848) $1s,ooo So $100,000 $o $D $o $115,000 Total Costs: $15,000 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 50 5115,000 Impact on Operations: Minor impact such as cleaning and replacing damaged portions as needed 68 P119 JL Key: TBD Windrows Park Fire Lane Repair ProjectLOCation: ~ ~ ~~ ~~ Northwest corner of Windrows ij A ~- ,_ ~~1~_ Park. The Fire lane is accessed ~ - from Bougainville Way _ t _ _ PROJECT ~OCATIO~ Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Unfunded Department: Public Works Project Manager: Tim Faulkner Description Removal of the existing "Turf Block" fire lane and replacing it with poured concrete. Justification: This Fire lane serves as pedestrian and emergency services access to the Park as well as the adjacent elementary school. It was constructed in the 1980s and over the past 20 years has become extremely uneven due to adjacent tree roots pushing up the turf block. Replacement with poured concrete should prevent further damage and mitigate the existing trip hazards. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateevrv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right-of-Way 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Construction 50 $0 $30,000 50 $0 $0 530,000 Inspection & Administration SO SO 50 SO 50 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 50 $D $0 $0 $0 Total COSLS: $0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,D00 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Vears 2011 12 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TOTAL Unfunded $0 SO $30,000 SO $0 $0 530,000 Total Costs: SO $0 $30,000 $0 $D $0 $30,000 Impact on Operations: The project will be coordinated with the Windrows Elementary School, Community Services Departm ent and fire District so that all a re aware of the t iming and the la ck of access for t he construction period. 69 P120 .41604■41 Jo" RDAUnfunded Projects included in this section are those that have been identified as being a priority but lack dedicated funding due to the dissolution of Redevelopment. The Projects designated as `RDA Unfunded' are projects that are awaiting the outcome of potential Redevelopment Bond distributions. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that were impacted by the end of Redevelopment and are not currently able to be funded by any other special fund monies. Potential Future Sources of Funding Project List& Future Expenditures I. Archibald Ave, Church St to $1,215,000 $80,000 000 Palo Alto St—Storm Drain $3.215,000 2. Arrow Rte at I-15 Interchange $80,000,000 $1,000,000 3. Biane Library-2nd Floor Ran- $5,900,000 $4,600,000 cho Kids Project $25.000 4,900,000 4. Etiwanda Ave—Grade separa- $2,000,000 tion at Metrolink tracks and widening 6th St to Arrow Rte 5. Foothill Blvd, Grove Ave to San $4,625,000 Bernardino Rd—Widening and Median Island including land- scaped median to Vineyard RDA ■Unknown 111 RDA Tax Increment ■ Library Services Fund Total $93,740,000 IIIRDA 2004 TAB Transportation 70 P121 Project Number: 800-2012-14 JL Key: 1805 Archibald Avenue, from Church Street to Palo Alto Street, Storrn Drain Project Location: Archibald Ave, Foothill Blvd to Base Line Rd Est. Construction Start/End Unknown Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL ~ BASE LINE RD BASE LINE RD _ J~~ ~~ ON -rte An HE~ PALO ALTO PROJECT LOCATION PAR ITY i '~"a i a f a a a Z l -=i _ ~ ~Il ~ _ - FOOTHILL BLVD 66 n _ - ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~I II ~i ~Ifi ~ ~~- R ~ ~'~ l~ II I i'_, li Ij q !~_ ~ ~ w z Description: Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain; install catch basins, manholes, and laterals. Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area. Project Cost Estimate ($j: Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $D $0 $0 50 SO $0 Design/Plan Review $0 SO $35,000 $0 50 SO 535,000 Right•of-Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D $0 Construction SD $0 $1,000,000 $0 SO $D $1,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 580,000 $0 $0 SO $80,000 Contingency $0 $0 $100,000 $0 SO 50 $100,000 Total Costs: $o So St,us.ooo $0 50 $o $1,zls,ooo Project Funding: Fundinrt Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T 7 RDA j500) $0 $0 $1,215,000 $D $0 $0 $1,215,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $1,215,000 $o $0 $0 $1,215,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs f or pothole repair s, weed and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. 71 P122 Project Number: 800-2005-15 JL Key: 1360 Arrow Route and I-15 Interchange Project LOCation: c rP nrxRx~ ~ - I - I-15 freeway from north of Foothill - _ Blvd to south of Arrow Rte - Est. Construction Start/End 1/2018-1/2021 Project Status: ~~ Pre-design and Environmental ~ ~1r ~_~ ~L~~ ~ ARROW Department: ~~~~'--~! Engineering ~; Project Manager: Walt Stickney Description: The construction of a new interchange at Arrow Route at the I-15 freeway. Justification: The new interchange will alleviate traffic to and from the freeway at foothill Boulevard. Project Cost Estimate ~$) Expenditure/Cateaorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBO TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 SO SD $0 50 Design/Plan Review 51,281,500 SD So SD So So S1,z81,soo Right-of-Way 56,850,800 50 50 50 50 50 $6,850,800 Construction SD $D So So So Sso,ooo,ooo SsD,ooo,ooo Inspection & Administration 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency 50 50 50 50 50 $0 50 Total Costs: 58,132,300 $0 50 50 50 580,000,000 $88,132,300 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 TBD T TAL 2004 TAB's (660) $8,132,300 $0 50 50 50 580,000,000 588,132,300 Total Costs: 58,132,300 50 50 50 50 $80,000,000 588.132,300 Impact on Operations: None. Facility will be maintained by the State 72 P123 1L Key: TBD Biane Library -Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Project Location: 12505 Cultural Center Dr (2nd floor of the Paul A. Biane Library) Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Design Department: Library Project Manager: Robert Karatsu I I CHURCH STREET III o: 0 m o: a o PROJECT LOCATION •I s' 0 11Jp}'.~)1~. ~x ~ ~~ O - - nruwwsrvucr a g~ ~L~,q .~BRAR ucruv - - ~ ,- ~N` pul~r~li'Tc I - •^r -Or Cep L uuu~ u Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of [he Paul A. Biane Library a[ Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning experience for children ages 0-7 (and their parents!) in our community. Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase, particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed to provide a new, unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional library services. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse. Project Cost Estimate ($(: Expenditure/Category Prior Vears 201213 201314 201415 201516 201617 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review 590,000 $0 $400,000 50 $0 $0 5490.000 Right-of-Way 50 50 5o So So So 50 Construction 50 $o So Ss,ooo,000 50 50 55,000,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $0 50 50 50 50 50 Contingency ' $0 50 SO 5500,000 $0 50 $500,000 Total COSIS: $90,000 $0 $400,000 $5,500,000 50 50 55,990,000 Project Funding: Fundin~6ource Prior Years 201112 201213 201314 201415 201516 TOTAL Library Services Fund (302) 590,000 $0 50 $1,000,000 $0 50 $1,090,000 RDA-Library Fund X630) $0 $0 $x00,000 54,500,000 $0 $0 54.900,000 Total COSLS: 590,000 $0 $400,000 $5,500,000 $0 $0 $5,990,000 Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate $250,000 cost per year for operations and maintenance. (The project is designed to be revenue-generating.) 73 P124 Project Number: 800-2010-15 JL Key: 1076 Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation and Widening Between 6th Street to Arrow Route Project Location: Etiwanda Ave from 6th St t0 Arrow Rte Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description lustificatlon: ' `/! - ' - ~7~ ~. 4~ ~ ~ / 40 ~ z ~j// >3 y //RROw ROUTE a > ~ ~~ wl a ~ ¢~ ¢ i ~ ~_ ~ w W , ~ ~ Y' z _ v scn~e r,,,~~r ~ RAILROAD = F J 6TH ST ~ ~ ~ P OJECT L CATION Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south of Whitram Avenue, a grade crossing at 6th Street west of Etiwanda Avenue, and widening of Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route. It will also install a storm drain along Etiwanda Avenue. This project will eliminate an at-grade railroad crossing, connect a missing segment of 6th Street with an at-grade crossing at the existing BNSF railroad spur track, and improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue and 6th Street. Project Cost Estimate ($~: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $D $0 $0 SO $0 50 Design/Plan Review $337,000 $2,000,000 SO SO $0 $0 $2,337,000 Right-of-Way 50 50 $o $0 $D $D So Construction $0 50 $0 SO $0 $0 50 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 5o SO SO SO So Contingency $o $D $0 50 $0 50 50 Total Costs: $337,000 $2,000,000 50 50 50 50 $2.337,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2012 13 2013 14 201415 201516 201617 TAL RDA (500) $337,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,337,000 Total Costs: $337,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,337,000 Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge, storm drain and landscaping will be determined during Design phase 74 P125 Project Number: 800-1999-15 JL Key: 1189 Foothill Boulevard, Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road, including Landscaped Median to Vineyard Avenue Project Location: Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd, including landscaped median to Vineyard Ave Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings RED HILL ^., ICOUNTRY`~ cLUa PROJECT LOCATION ~~ i, y _, ~ `~! \ .'~ ,' FOOTHILL BLVD ~ - - W 2,,~ -' a a a \~. } Q P ~. W W J ~ it = YY 2 ~ _ c =~ ~~~~ ARROW Q~ ROUTE > .~ __l~-;Y III ~ v McKINLEY STREET '`-_'~ ~ _ .. N.T.S. ._i I ~ CITy ~~, • ._ 8TH STREET CITY LIMJT WARD Description: This project is the last phase of the multi-phased Foothill Boulevard street and bridge improvements and includes right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, street widening, storm drain and landscape improvements, including arches at both the west and east City limits. Justification: This project will provide increased traffic and pedestrian circulation including safety and visual enhancements. The project is identified in the City's General Plan, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and has been marked as a City Council goal. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeorv Prior Years 2012 13 2013 la 2014 15 2015 16 2016 17 T TAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 SO $0 SO $0 50 Design/Plan Review $3,096,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $0 53,096,000 Right-of-way $713,000 Szs,ooo SO 51a1,ooo $o So 5879,000 Construction $9,884,000 $0 $0 $4,059,000 $0 $0 $13,943,000 Inspection & Administration $613,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 5613,000 Contingency $1,289,000 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 51,689,000 Total Costs: 515,595,000 525,000 SO $4,600,000 $0 $D $z0,2z0,000 Project Funding: FundineSource Prior Years 201213 2013 14 201415 201516 201617 TOTAL RDA - 2001 TAB (650) $3,504,000 $0 SO $0 $0 50 $3,504,000 RDA - 2004 TAB (660) $11,684,000 $0 $0 SO $0 50 $11.684,000 Transportation Fund (124) $407,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $D Sa32,000 Unfunded So So SO $4,600,000 So So Sa,6oo,000 TOtaI COSts: $15,595,000 $25,000 $0 $4,600,000 $0 $0 $20,220,D00 Impact on Operations: This project adds one mile of additional landscape maintenance costs along Foothill Blvd, as well as some additional street lig hts into SLD 1. 75 STAFF REPORT IUINCHO CUCAD'fONGd FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO ~UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,203,610 AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,920,117 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 18, 2012 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of Directors approve and adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund Preliminary Budget in the amount of $24,203,610 and the General Fund's Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit in the amount of $29,920,117 for Fiscal Year 2012/13 and set approval of a final budget for the July 18, 2012 Board Meeting. BACKGROUND The Fire District's General Fund Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13 is herein recommended for adoption by the Board of Directors. Budget workshops were held on June 6, and June 14, 2012, which included specific discussion regarding the preliminary budget. The increase in the General Fund budget is a result of post-redevelopment property tax which now comes through as regular property tax revenue instead of through apass-thru agreement with the Redevelopment Agency. Those funds will continue to be used primarily to fund capital and infrastructure replacement. The proposed budget continues to meet the Council/Fire Board direction of operating independently. The Fire District was able to achieve a proposed balanced budget through a combination of slight revenue increases and continued improvements of operational and administrative efficiencies. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the Board of Directors. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by the Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 3.77% and a population change of 1.07%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's fiscal year 2012/13 General Fund's appropriations limit is $29,920,117. The District's fiscal year 2012/13 General Fund appropriations subject to this limit total $21,557,140. It is anticipated that the District will be at 72.05% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2013. P126 P727 CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION PAGE 2 DISTRICT GENERAL FUND PRELIMINARY BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $24,203,610 AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $29,920,117 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 AND SET FINAL APPROVAL OF A FINAL BUDGET FOR JULY 6, 2011 JUNE 21.2012 Please refer to the City Manager's Budget Message for specific details regarding the Fire District's General Fund. The advertised public hearing for adoption of the Fire District General Fund Final Budget is set for July 18, 2012. Respecttull submitt~e4d, '~~~2~~Y ike Bell Fire Chief Attachment Resolution No. FD 12-035 P128 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF .DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government for the prior year be adjusted for change in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in Sections (5), (7) and (8) of said Article XIII-B. These exclusions are: Debt Service Funds, Revenue Bonds, Federal Funds and Grants, Contingencies, Emergencies, Enterprise Funds, Capital Improvement Carry-Overs, Capital Equipment, Intra-Governmental Service Funds, Reserves for Workers Compensation, Long-Term Disability, Retirement, Unemployment and other reserve, funds that are deemed reasonable and proper per the aforementioned sections; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District deems it to be in the best interest of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to establish a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that said General Fund's appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 be established in the amount of $29, 920,117. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that a General Fund appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 pursuant to Article XIII-B of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $29,920,117 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the Board of Directors. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 215` day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: L. Dennis Michael, President Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P129 I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2012. Executed this _ day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-035 -Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCdMONGd FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,520,070 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,397,429 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Fire Board approve the attached resolutions adopting the Mello-Roos CFD No. 85-1 annual budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13 in the amount of $6,520,270 and the Appropriations Limit in the amount of $11,397,429. BACKGROUND Since Fiscal Year 1986/87, the Board has annually adopted a CFD budget to provide for operations and maintenance costs attributable to providing fire protection services within CFD No. 85-1. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13 provides funding for a portion of the personnel and operational costs necessary to maintain existing fire and life safety service levels within CFD boundaries. The remaining operational and maintenance costs within the CFD are provided through the Fire District's General Fund budget. When the Fire District's CFD No. 85-1 was approved by the voters in 1985, an appropriations limit was established at $1,775,000 (1985 costs for operations and maintenance). In order to adjust the maximum spending authority (appropriations limit) to meet increased costs for operations and maintenance, the voters authorized the District to annually adjust the limit. This adjustment is based upon the same methodology used in calculating public agency Prop. 4 spending limits under Article XIIIB of the State of California Constitution. The factors used to develop the appropriations limit are the C.P.I. change and the change in the city's population. The attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 3.77% and a population change of 1.07%) per the State of California Department of Finance, the District's CFD No. 85-1 fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations limit is $11,397,429. The District's CFD No. 85-1 Fiscal Year 2012/13 appropriations subject to this limit total $6,505,380. It is anticipated that the District will be at 57.08% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2013. P130 P131 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT PAGE 2 OF $6,520,070 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,397,429 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN COMMUNITIES FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD) NO. 85-1 JUNE 21, 2012 On June 6 and June 14, 2012, the City Council/Fire District Board of Directors conducted comprehensive workshops regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 85-1. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 85-1's annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Respec Ily submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments Resolution No. FD 12-036 Resolution No. FD 12-037 P132 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-036 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, the "District"), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has received and reviewed a budget for fiscal year 2012/13 for the Community Facilities District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13 a copy of said budget being on file in the office of the Community Facilities District and available for public inspection. Section 2. Filing of Budget. The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to forward a certified copy of this resolution and a copy of the budget to the Office of the Auditor-Controller for the County of San Bernardino. P133 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary day of , 2012 L. Dennis Michael, President I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 12-036 -Page 2 of 2 P134 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-037 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-RODS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2072/73 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, a special election was held in the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "Community Facilities District") of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District; the "District"), on Tuesday, December 10, 1985; and WHEREAS, as a result of the election, more than two-thirds (2/3) of the qualified electors voted in favor of a proposition to authorize the levy of a special tax for fire suppression services and facilities, to establish an appropriations limit and to annually adjust the special tax and appropriations limit based upon changes in cost of living and changes in population; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to establish the appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District 85-1 for the fiscal year 2012/13; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows:. Section 1. Appropriations Limit. This Board of Directors hereby establishes the fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations limit for the Community Facilities District No. 85-1 at $11,397,429 based on the factors of the Gann limit (a C.P.I. change of 3.77% and a population change of 1.07%) per the State of California Department of Finance. Section 2. Approval of Electorate. This Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been established by the qualified electorate at a special election held on December 10, 1985, in the manner provided by law. Section 3. Filin The Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors for San Bernardino County and with the office of the Auditor-Controller for the State of California. P135 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2012. Executed this _ day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 12-037 -Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAlvIONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: June 21, 2012 To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II RANCHO C,,UCAMONGA Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,850,090 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,671,439 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RECOMMENDATION Approval of resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $1,850,090 and the appropriations limit in the amount of $2,671,439 for fiscal year 2012/13 in Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1. BACKGROUND On April 4, 1989, the qualified voters approved the formation of Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 and authorized the District to annually levy a special tax to provide for fire protection services within northeast Etiwanda. On May 19, 1989, the Board adopted an ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax in CFD 88-1. The ordinance authorizes the District, by resolution, to annually levy the special tax for purposes of land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of equipment and operations and maintenance costs (which includes personnel) to provide fire protection services within CFD 88-1. Fiscal Year 2012/13 is the twenty-fourth (24) consecutive year the District has levied a special tax to provide required revenues for capital improvements (land, fire station facility, equipment) and fire protection services (personnel, operations and maintenance (O&M)) within this CFD. Accordingly, the Fiscal Year 2012/13 budget includes fully burdened personnel costs associated with existing memorandums of understanding between the District and its bargaining units. Because CFD 88-1 does not currently generate sufficient funds to fully support the total annual staffing costs, supplemental funding will be necessary thru the Fire District's General Fund budget. P136 P137 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE PAGE 2 AMOUNT OF $1,850,090 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,671,439 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 JUNE 21, 2012 The following resolutions are submitted for your consideration to adopt the fiscal year 2012/13 annual budget and appropriations limit in CFD No. 88-1. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2012/13 proposed budget in the amount of $1,850,090. 2. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations limit in an amount equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which could be levied in fiscal year 2012/13. The resolution sets an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2012/13 at $2,671,439. On June 6 and June 14, 2012, the Board conducted comprehensive budget workshops regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 88-1 budget. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 88-1 annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Respe ully Su ~ ed, II Fire Chief Attachments Resolution No. FD 12-038 Resolution No. FD 12-039 P137 CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTIONS ADOPTING A BUDGET IN THE PAGE 2 AMOUNT OF $1,850,090 AND APPROVING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,671,439 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 JUNE 21, 2012 The following resolutions are submitted for your consideration to adopt the fiscal year 2012/13 annual budget and appropriations limit in CFD No. 88-1. 1. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2012/13 proposed budget in the amount of $1,850,090. 2. A resolution adopting the fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations limit in an amount equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which could be levied in fiscal year 2012!13. The resolution sets an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2012/13 at $2,671,439. On June 6 and June 14, 2012, the Board conducted comprehensive budget workshops regarding all budgets which included the proposed CFD No. 88-1 budget. The resolutions adopting CFD No. 88-1 annual budget and appropriations limit are now presented for your consideration of approval. Resp ully SU ' ted, I I Fire Chief Attachments Resolution No. FD 12-038 Resolution No. FD 12-039 P138 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT N0.88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, this legislative body has received and reviewed a budgetforfiscal year 2012/13 for the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Adoption of Budget. The Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the budget designated: "Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Annual Budget for Fiscal Year 2012/13" and is on file in the office of the District and available for public inspection. P139 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANCIE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held on the _ day of 2012. Executed this _ day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-038 -Page 2 of 2 P140 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-039 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (formerly Foothill Fire Protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "legislative body") has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors relating to the levy of a special tax in a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, as a result of such election, the qualified electors of the District authorized the establishment of an Article XIII-B appropriations limit for the District equal to the maximum authorized special taxes which may be levied in any fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this legislative body desires to establish the appropriations limit for the District for fiscal year 2012/13. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: SECTION 1. Appropriations Limit. This legislative body hereby establishes the appropriations limit for Community Facilities District No. 88-1 for fiscal year 2012/13 in an amount equal to $2,671,439. SECTION 2. Approval by Electorate. This legislative body hereby finds and determines that the foregoing appropriations limit has been authorized by the qualified electors of the District at a special election held on April 4, 1989, in the manner provided by law. P741 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary day of , 2012. L. Dennis Michael, President I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board.of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a special meeting of said Board held of the _ day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary . Resolution No. 12-039 -Page 2 of 2 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRdTIVE SERVICES DEPdRTbfENT Date: June 21, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services ~~ By: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director, Subject: ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 BUDGET AND ARTICLE XIIIB APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT P142 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA 1. Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the fiscal year2012/13 budget. 2. Council approve the attached resolution adopting the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2012/13. BACKGROUND The City of Rancho Cucamonga has proposed aone-year program of service with the 2012/13 fiscal year budget. The attached resolution adopts that one-year budget and reflects any changes recommended and approved by Council at the publicly held budget study session. FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 BUDGET General Fund Library Services Special Funds Total $ 63,414,270 $ 3,924,980 $ 68,343,940 2. The State of California Constitution, Article XIIIB, requires that an appropriations limit be established annually by the City Council. The factor used to develop the appropriations limit is the C.P.I. change and the change in the City's population per the State of California Department of Finance. The additional attached resolution adopts the annual appropriations limit as required by Article XIIIB of the State Constitution. Based on the factors of the Gann Limit (a C.P.I. change of 3.77% and a population change of 1.07%), the City's fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations limit is $64,177,737. The City's fiscal year 2012/13 appropriations subject to this limit total $50,765,610. It is anticipated that the City will be at 79.10% of its Gann Limit at June 30, 2013. Attachments Resolutions is/finance/budget2013/City Council.rtaff repartr/City budget adoption 2012-13.doc P143 RESOLUTION NO. 12--1.06 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 BUDGET WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held two workshops to review the appropriation requests for the fiscal year 2012/13 on June 6, 2012 and June 14, 2012, and; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a public hearing on the General City Budget, and; WHEREAS, this public hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation and held on June 21, 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve on this 215` day of June 2012, as follows: Section 1: Adoption of Fiscal Year 2012/13 Budget. The City of Rancho Cucamonga budget for the fiscal year 2012/13, on file in the office of the Finance Director, is hereby adopted in the amount of $135,683,190. This budget total includes appropriations for both the general and other special purpose funds. Section 2: Transfers of Funds Between and/or Within Appropriations. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga may transfer funds between funds or activities set forth in the budget. The City Manager may transfers funds between appropriations within any fund as set forth in the budget and may transfer appropriations between activities within any cost center in the same fund. Section 3: Transfers of Funds Between Funds. Transfers of funds between funds as shown throughout the fund transfer sections of the budget shall be made as expenditures warrant such transfers. Section 4: Disbursements. The City Manager and the Finance Director, or the duly designated representative, are hereby empowered and authorized to disburse funds pursuant to appropriations provided for in the fiscal year 2012/13 budget, and have the responsibility to establish procedures and to administratively implement and control the budget on all matters, except direct expenditures by Councilmembers which require Council approval. Section 5: Additional Appropriations. The City Council may amend this temporary budget to add or delete appropriations. Section 6: Personnel. The City Manager is hereby empowered and authorized to develop and fill additional positions as deemed necessary to conduct City operations provided funding is available in the budget. P144 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21~` day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2012. Executed this _ day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P745 RESOLUTION NO. 12- 107 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012/13 WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the State of California provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the State and of each local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as otherwise provided in said Article XIIIB, and; WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga deems it to be in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish an appropriations limit for fiscal year 2012/13, and; WHEREAS, the Finance Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that said appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 be established in the amount of $64,177,737. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does hereby resolve that an appropriations limit for the fiscal year 2012/13 pursuant to Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of California be established in the amount of $64,177,737 and the same is hereby established. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by resolution of the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 215` day of June, 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary L. Dennis Michael, President I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of June, 2012. P146 Executed this _ day of June 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary i:Ifinancelbudget20131City Council staff reportslResolution-City Appropriations Limit 2012-13.doc