Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/01/05 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. January 5, 2000 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo Duttoh , and Willjams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Introduction of newly-assigned deputies, Greg Hill, Jerry Esmond, Alecia Lucas and Raul Lorera, to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Station. Presentation of Proclamations recognizing the generous support of the major sponsors, Executive Committee Members and broadcast hosts for the 1999 Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Telethon. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing Faust Printing for receiving the first-ever "They Said It Couldn't Be Done" Award from the Printing Industry of America" (PIA). C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: November 3, 1999 November 10, 1999 (Special Meeting) November 17, 1999 (Alexander & Curatalo absent) December 1, 1999 (Biane & Curatalo absent) December 7, 1999 (Special Meeting, Curatalo absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/8/99 and 12/15/99 and 1 Payroll ending 12/5/99 for the total amount of $6,534,712.01. City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 Approval of Authorization for the purchase of one (1) International Model 2654 - 6X4 ten-wheel dump truck from Dieterich International Truck Sales of San Bernardino, California, through a Piggyback/Cooperative Purchase Agreement with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District in the amount of $95,669.07, funded from two accounts, # 07-4647-7045 and 09-4637-7045. Approval of disposition of City-owned property within Tract 14380, located at the nodhwest corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues, submitted by Mastercraft Cucamonga I, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 00-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND AUTHORIZING THE AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT THE SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD Approval of a Resolution Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for MDR 99-32, located at 9177 Center Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 00-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 99-32 Approval of Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 99-32, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street, submitted by Sunrise Rancho Cucamonga Assisted Living, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 00-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-32 11 12 14 19 2O 23 26 City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 3 RESOLUTION NO. 00-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 5 FOR DR 99-32 Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bonds, accept Maintenance Bonds, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract Map 15797 and Tract Map 15797-1, submitted by Tava Development Co., a California Company, DBA Citation Homes, located south of Highland Avenue, east of Woodruff Place. Tract 15797 Tract 15797-1 Release: Faithful Performance Bond 3SM91449100 3SM91002000 $101,285.00 $949,825.00 Accept: Maintenance Bond 3SM91449100A 3SM94002000A $10,129.00 $94,983.00 RESOLUTION NO. 00-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 15797 AND TRACT 15797-1, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Project located at the intersection of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, Contract No. 98-053 as complete, release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final Contract amount of $94,569.00. RESOLUTION NO. 00-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING PROJECT LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98- 053 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 27 30 31 32 33 City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 4 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any items can be removed for discussion. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12,04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT QF LEASH- OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO ORDINANCE NO. 618 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO 34 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Code regarding thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. ORDINANCE NO. 619 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.140 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING DEFINITIONS FOR THRIFT STORES, SECOND-HAND STORES, ANTIQUE SHOPS, AND PAWN SHOPS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 39 52 City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 5 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following requirements. testimony. items have no legal publication or posting The Chair will open the meeting to receive public No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. CONSIDERATION OF I-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS AND APPROVAL TO USE BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS FOR FREEWAY LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT 55 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING LITIGATION REGARDING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VERSUS COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ET AL UNIVERSITY CREST PROJECT), PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 City Council Agenda January 5, 2000 6 t, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 29, 1999, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. November 3, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 3, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:36 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Willlares, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner; Sal Salazar, Associate Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of the winner of the Rancho Cucamonga Census 2000 Poster Contest. Proclamation presented to Sarahita Wyatt-Paige as the winner of the contest. Sun Sundell stated the Macaroni Grill wanted to present the winner and all participants with gift certificates for participating in the contest. She also thanked the Macaroni Grill for their suppod. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring "World Town Planning Day." Proclamation presented to Larry McNeil, Planning Commission Chairman. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. Jim Frost, City Treasurer, talked about the Veterans Ceremony to be held at Alta Loma High School on Sunday at 4:00 p.m. C2. Kathryn Wyant, 4999 Ginger Court, stated the residents were furious about the Mayor's comments about who started the fire. She felt the Haven View people are being ignored. She mentioned a television program to be aired on channel 54 where the Haven View residents' concerns would be addressed. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 2 C3. George Holgate, Red Cross, stated there would be a dance on Saturday to raise funds for the World War II Memorial at 6:30 p.m. in Chino. C4. Wayne Hoover, 10951 Carriage Dr., talked how he built in Haven View and all the problems he had getting approvals. He did not know why the Lauren project is being allowed to be built. Councilmember Dutton asked if the homeowners of Haven View have talked to County Flood Control about their property. He felt they should get involved with what the County is doing also as it relates to the area in the northern part of the City. C5. John Lyons talked about the proposed high school. He informed the Council about his organization called SOC (save our children). He stated with the closing of Highland, this will force the students to drive the freeway to get to Rancho Cucamonga High School and the proposed new high school. He asked for the Council to support their concerns. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/13/99 and 10/29/99, and Payroll ending 10/14/99 for the total amount of $1,757,983.81. D2. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for La Paloma Market (transfer of license), Samoue Salim F., 8847 Archibald Avenue. D3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale General for Top Valu Market (transfer of license), K V Mart Co., 6351 Haven Avenue. D4. Approval to appropriate $20,969 from Fund 24 - "Engineering - Street Transportation Program" (NC 24-4637-9825) to complete the Office of Traffic Safety Grant Project No. TR 9817 to provide a collision database and analysis system. D5. Approval to appropriate $70,000 from Fund 20 (Park Development Reserve) for additional work on the Central Park Project. D6. Approval of Request from San Bernardino County Sheriff's Athletic Federation for City to Co- Sponsor California Police and Fire Games 2000 to be held at selected venues in the Inland Empire, including Beryl Park, Red Hill Community Park and Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Sports Complex, On June 26 - July 1, 2000, and to waive associated fees and charges. D7. Approval of a Request from San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's West Valley Search and Rescue Team for City to Co-Sponsor Annual Fun Run and Safety Fair on April 29, 2000, at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and to waive associated fees and charges. D8. Approval to abandon the proceedings and to cancel public hearings to consider termination of the authority to levy special taxes within Community Facilities District 91-1 and Improvement Area No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 99-230 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (VICTORIA COMMUNITY) OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, TO ABANDON PROCEEDINGS AND TO CANCEL PUBLIC HEARINGS City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 3 TO CONSIDER THE TERMINATION OF THE AUTHORITY TO LEVY SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN SUCH DISTRICT AS A WHOLE AND WITHIN IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF SUCH DISTRICT D9. Approval of applications for Grant Funds from the Transportation Enhancement Act Activities Program and the Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Metrolink Station Beautification Project, and the application for funds from the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program for the Landscape Enhancement and Improvement Project for the 210 Foothill Freeway Extension within Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 99-231 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE METROLINK RAILWAY STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT RESOLUTION NO. 99-232 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (TEA) PROGRAM OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21) FOR THE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE 210 FOOTHILL FREEWAY EXTENSION IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESOLUTION NO. 99-233 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METRQLINK STATION BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT D10. Approval to appropriate $48,000 annually to Acct. No. 01-4285-6028 and the execution of Professional Consulting Agreement (CO 99-096) to David Turch and Associates to provide federal legislative advocacy services. D11. Approval to award a contract (CO 99-097) to RJM Design Group in the amount of $15,000 to be funded from Fund 20 (Park Development) for additional work on the Central Park Project. D12. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement (CO 99-098) with Holmes and Narver, Inc. to provide project study report services for future interchange and signal modifications at Base Line Road and 1-15 Freeway in the amount of $79,150, and authorization of 10% contingency to be funded from Account No. 22-4637-9922. D13. Approval of an Agreement (CO 99-099) for the City to acquire an Off-site Easement, Security, and Deposit for Tentative Tract No. 15711, located north of Foothill Boulevard, east of Etiwanda Avenue, south of Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue, submitted by RC Homes, LLC - Foothill Meadows. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 99-234 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT OF OFF-SITE PROPERTY, SECURITY, AND DEPOSIT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15711, FROM RC HOMES, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME D14. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for DR 99-15, located on the east side of Milliken Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Catellus Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-235 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGAREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-15 D15. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tract 14379, located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Centex Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 99-236 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14379 D16. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extensions for Tract 14459, located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Lemon Avenues, submitted by Alta Loma One and Two, A Joint Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 99-237 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14459 D17. Approval to accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for Parcel Map 15155, submitted by Master Development Corporation, located on the northwest corner of Jersey Boulevard and White Oak Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond 441231S Accept:: Maintenance Bond 441231S $175,000.00 $ 17,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 99-238 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 15155 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 5 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Curatalo to approve the staff recommendation sin the staff repods contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Em CONSENT ORDINANCES No items submitted. Fm ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) -APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F1 and F2. Staff report presented by Rebecca VanBuren, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 99-239 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL; AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Biane to approve Resolution No. 99-239. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 6 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 611. ORDINANCE NO. 611 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 611 for the November 17, 1999 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: Industrial Area Specific Plan (ISPA) 99-02, Development District Amendment (DDA) 99-03, General Plan Amendment (GPA) 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map. located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for two parcels totaling 0.7 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 7 FT. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY QF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F9. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the General Plan Land Use Map for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F10. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F3 - F11. Staff report presented by Sal Salazar, Associate Planner. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Bruce Stickland of Griffin Industries, stated he supported the Planning Commission's recommendation. He showed pictures of the project and explained them for the Council. Carla Florance, 9580 Meadow, stated she has been involved with this project and further added she had been asked to be notified of any future meetings pertaining to this, but was not notified about tonight's meeting. She referred to her letter that was distributed to the Council. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated there is no reason why the Lucas property can't continue in the direction it was started. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 99-240 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05A, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF --APN: 210-062-31 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 612, 613, 614, 615, 616 and 617. ORDINANCE NO. 612 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 613 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 210-062-31 RESOLUTION NO. 99-241 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05B, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRES FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 9 ORDINANCE NO. 614 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 615 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 RESOLUTION NO. 99-242 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05C, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution Nos. 99-240, 99-241 and 99- 242. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-10 ORDINANCE NO. 617 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page ]0 DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETVVEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Biane to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance Nos. 612 through 617 for the November 17, 1999 meeting. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL'S LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION (Oral) Staff report by Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager, who stated the subcommittee recommends that Ron Stark be appointed. MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Williams to appoint Ron Stark to the Library Foundation. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Dutton asked for a detailed report on the present proposed development in the County which is in the City's sphere. He asked that this come back at the December 1, 1999 Council meeting. Councilmember Willjams asked for the history to be spelled out how this was developed from previous City Council members as well. J2. Mayor Alexander stated he and Councilmember Dutten would be meeting to discuss the proposed high school issues and would report back to the full Council at a future meeting. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. City Council Minutes November 3, 1999 Page 11 L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Curatalo, seconded by Biane to adjourn to Wednesday, November 10, 1999, 6:00 p.m. in the Tri Communities Room for a special joint meeting with the Cucamonga County Water District. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** November 10, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Joint Meeting with the Cucamoncla County Water District A. CALL TO ORDER An Adjourned Joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and the Cucamonga County Water District was held on Wednesday, November 10, 1999, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:01 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present from the City were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Present from the Water District were Boardmembers: Robed Neufeld, Jerome M. Wilson, Donald J. Kurth, and Henry L. Stoy. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Robert A. DeLoach, General ManagedSecretary, CCWD; Jim Curatalo, Jr., Director-Elect, CCWD; Gene Tanaka, Counsel for CCWD; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION OF CHINO BASIN OPTIMUM BASIN MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (OBMP) Robert A. DeLoach, General ManagedSecretary, CCWD, said CCWD wanted to communicate with the City a plan they have been putting together that could dramatically impact and change the way CCWD does business with respect to water quality, quantity and price. Mr. DeLoach provided the background information. He said the court appointed a new Water Master which also required CCWD to prepare a plan. He reported that the first phase of the report is finished and now they are working on the next phase on how to implement it and pay for it. Mr. Neufeld, President of CCWD and Chairman of the Watermaster, gave the presentation on the Chino Basin Optimum Basin Management Program (OBMP). He said the discussion is critical not only to CCWD but also to the City because they represent basically the same constituents. City Council Minutes November 10, 1999 Page 2 Mr. Neufeld said their concern is what is going to happen to the constituents of this area when it comes to the implementation of this plan that would rid the underground water supplies of nitrates and other contaminants. He reviewed the following: · Map showing the background boundaries of the Chino Basin. · OBMP (consisting of four parts) ,/ Introduction: The basin, the boundaries, the makeup of the Board · / State of the Basin: Water quality issues, problems, etc. · / Goals of OBMP: Clean up water, improve water quality ,/ Management Plan: Phase II is implementation which consists of goals to enhance the basin water supply by using reclaimed water and storm flows and capture for recharge purposes; protect and enhance water quality by imposing restrictions/regulations to make sure that everybody does the right thing; enhance the management of the basin; and, the key issue, financing of the OBMP. · 1993 Land Use Map · Basin consists of 35 square miles ., Cost of Plan: $300 - $500 million · State & Federal Assistance: $150 -$200 million may become available, although $87 million is contingent upon voter approval a statewide water initiative on the March ballot. Mr. Neufeld said if we started today and imposed the current rate49 cents per 100 cubic feet--in 20 years residents would pay $3.19 per 100 cubic feet of water. He said the agriculture interest in the south end of the basin is one of the most respected and well organized lobbying groups, and they have indicated that they feel no obligation to pay for the cost of the cleanup in the basin. Mr. Neufeld said the Water District's goal is to make sure that everybody pays their fair share of the cleanup and to support the water bond in 2000.. Councilmember Biane asked what implementation methods will be used and how is this money to be spent. Mr. Neufeld explained that the nitrate levels in the southern end of the basin are running about 60 milligrams per liter. The regulated standards for drinking water are 10 milligrams per liter. He said in the northern end of the basin the water supply typically runs about 5 milligrams per liter, so you can see there is a tremendous amount of degradation in the water supply in the southern end. He said we can buy imported water cheaper than we can treat this water down here, but we still have to do it because if we don't we're going to lose this water supply. The other way is to use the storm flows to recharge and help flush out the basins, and this is relatively inexpensive. Mr. Neufeld said they have made progress in dealing with County Flood Control. He said an integral part of our plan to make sure that we do work with the County and with the various other entities that are out there to either acquire the rights to this land or purchase the land outright. Mr. DeLoach stated that some of the property that the County wants to dispose of serves no useful purpose for flood control. He said the land and soil is so bad that it does not percolate; so after a little bit of rain it rises to the top and then floods. Bob Dutton asked where the optimum area is for percolation. Mr. DeLoach said anywhere north of the 1-10- to the base of the foothills is the optimum area. Mr. Neufeld said what has been identified as part of the plan that would have the least impact on various agencies and on development is to look at obtaining permits to operate within the right of ways for the power lines. He said there has been a lot of success in northern CA with water City Council Minutes November10,1999 Page 3 agencies acquiring rights from PG&E to do exactly that. He said it gives us a wide enough area where we can basically use those powerline transmission quarters as spreading basins. Mr. Neufeld said that the cleanup of the basin is not 100% dairies, but that is the major focus. He said the cleanup would help rid the aquifer of nitrates and other compounds that have polluted the water, most of which has come from manure-contaminated rainfall that has sunk into the ground. Gene Tanaka, CCWD Counsel from Best, Best & Krieger, said that the Regional Water Quality Control Board has the statutory authority to enforce cleanup by the dairies. He said to date they have not been able to make a lot of progress on that, as there has been intense opposition in. Secondly, EPA has statutes, in terms of the safe drinking water act that can be used as a backup. Mr. DeLoach said that the plan identifies several opportunities to make beneficial use of that product water. He said the treatment plants are located in the south end of Ontario by the 60 Freeway. He said the local plant that is shared with Fontann is in Etiwanda. To get more north of that you have to pump it and Edison costs are extremely expensive. He said they think they can get it as high as Central Park. Mr. DeLoach said the citrus growers contributed to this problem through nitrogen fedilizer applications. He said the Chine area has the highest concentration of cows than any place on earth. He stated that they claim that they can literally test the DNA of the nitrates in the soil and determine whether it came from the nitrogen applied to crops in the citrus groves or whether it actually came from the cows. CCWD thanked the City for listening to their presentation. Jack Lam, City Manager, said they a 4/5 vote is needed to add an item on for Executive Session. MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Dutton to add Executive Session item on agenda following adjournment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for Property generally located on the north side of Foothill Blvd. and west of Rochester Avenue; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director, Negotiating Party, regarding Terms of Agreement. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respecffullysubmi~ed, Approved: ** Kathryn L. Scott Deputy City Clerk November 17, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetincl A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, November 17, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:11 by Mayor Pro Tem Diane Willlares Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton, and Mayor Pro Tem Diane Willjams. Absent were: Councilmember Curatalo and Mayor Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Kevin Ennis, Deputy City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Shintu Bose, Deputy City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Spec Dist. Supervisor; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Paula Pachon, Management Analyst II; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Captain Rodney Hoops, Rancho Cucamonga Police Depadment; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B, ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing November 18, 1999, as "National GIS Day." Proclamation presented to Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director and Ingrid Bruce, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor. Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director, explained the functions of the GIS Department. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing November 18, 1999 as the "Great American Smokeout Day." Proclamation presented to Toni Dreier, Volunteer Chair of the event. Toni Dreier explained what this program was all about and its importance. B3. Presentation of the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement of Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for its high standards in governmental accounting and financial reporting. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 2 Mayor Alexander presented the award to Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; and Tamara Layne, Finance Officer. B4. Mayor Pro Tem Willjams extended congratulations to the Etiwanda High School Marching Eagle Regiment on their recent performance in Indianapolis, Indiana, last week. She added that after three days of competition against approximately 85 marching bands throughout the United States, the EHS- MER ranked No. 8 in the nation. She congratulated the band members, staff and parents for their hard work and dedication. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC C1. John Lyons stated he has or anized a group called SOC (save our children). He added they want to have Highland and 1~~ re-opened after the freeway opens. He felt it was unsafe for the kids to have to drive the freeways to get to school. He stated they need the Council to suppod this. Councilmember Dutton suggested that Mr. Lyons meet with the Route 30 Task Force to address this. Mr. Lyons felt it would have a lot more validity if this comes from the Council rather than him. Mayor Pro Tem Willjams suggested that Mr. Lyons meet with Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, to get some of his concerns addressed regarding this issue. C2. Jerry Jacobsen of the Windsong Tract stated he wanted to address the Council about the same matter that Mr. Lyons spoke on. He also had copies of letters which he distributed about this same matter. He asked that the City Council look at the situation and see what can be done to help the residents. C3. George Georgiou stated he came before the Council on October 6 asking that he be able to come before the Council so they can hear his appeal. He stated he has received a letter from the City Attorney's office, but asked for the Council's leadership. He felt his rights are being violated by not getting an answer why the Council will not hear his appeal. He stated Mr. Markman had reported that Citation Homes would rebuild his wall, but has been unable to verify this. Councilmember Dutton asked if the Appeals Board is in place. Bill Makshanoff, Building Official, stated yes and they are able to hear Mr. Georgiou's appeal. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated Mr. Georgiou does not understand what Mr. Markman is saying and that numerous correspondence has been written explaining the appeals board process. C4. Cindy Ott, Vintage Highlands, asked if a signal is being planned to go in at Vintage and Milliken. She questioned why the signal already went in at Vintage and Rochester when the street is closed. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated the developer was supposed to put the Vintage/Rochester signal in as part of their conditions for their project. He added a signal is planned for Vintage and Milliken. C5. Wayne Hoover of Haven View Estates, showed a video about the levee removal for the Lauren project and the effects it could have on various areas of the City. City Council Minutes November17,1999 Page 3 C6, Bill Hawkins, 4987 Ginger Court, wanted to address safety tonight as it relates to the Lauren project. He stated all they want is an independent safety study. He wanted the Army Corp and FEMA to see if this is acceptable according to today's standards. He stated all he has heard from the Council is that they need new information to do something about this. He brought materials for the Council to read so they will reconsider their decision. He stated they will go away if the Army Corp and FEMA certify the report stating this is safe, He asked for the Council to consider this. He asked that the Council put this on the next agenda to authorize an independent safety study. Councilmember Dutton asked if he was aware of a letter that came from the Army Corp of Engineers dated November 2, 1999 and what it stated. Mr. Hawkins stated yes. He felt the San Francisco or Washington, D.C. office of the Army Corp would state there are problems with the levee. C7. Tom Wells, Victoria, stated he has seen boulders pulled out of his yard and felt this should be addressed as a safety issue. C8. Thomas Bradford, Haven View Estates, stated he remembers Councilmember Dutton abstaining from this matter some time ago and did not know why he was going after Mr. Hawkins. He stated if the Washington, D.C. Army Corp says it is safe they will be happy. C9. Malon Sampson, Haven View Estates, stated he does not understand why a levee would be strengthened and a debris basin built previously, but now it is stated they are not needed. He stated he does not understand. He asked that the Council agendize the safety issue so that a safety study can be authorized to take place. He stated if the Army Corp says it is safe, it will be the last time the Council hears from him. C10. Steve Rhetoria, 11100 Kenyon, felt getting the Army Corp and FEMA's input was important. Cll. Shavez Moore, Victoria area, stated she saw the video and is concerned with the information that is in it. She stated she has seen what is in the newspaper and on TV. She asked that a study be done for safety reasons. C12. Maureen Sampson, 4965 Calico Court, talked about the safety issue of the levee. She asked for an independent safety study to take place and to get input from FEMA and the Army Corp. Councilmember Dutton stated he is concerned about public safety as is everyone on the Council. He stated he does not have a problem with this being referred to Washington, D.C. He suggested that this be authorized to be done. Councilmember Biane read a statement from the Army Corp's letter of November 2 regarding the safety of the levee. He added he does not have a problem sending this matter to Washington, D.C. Mayor Pro Tem Willjams asked for the City Attorney's office to draft a letter to the Army Corp with all the materials submitted and ask them for their input. Kevin Ennis, Deputy City Attorney, pointed out that it has been stated by several agencies that the situation is adequate with the removal of the levee. He stated he would be happy to forward the materials to Washington, D.C. and ask for their opinion. C13. Mr. Hawkins stated if a letter is being sent to Washington, D.C., an independent study should be requested, not just review documents that are being forwarded to them. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 4 Councilmember Biane stated this is not a public hearing for the purpose of debate. C14. Marilyn Bradford stated they re asking for a new independent study and not just to review documents. C15. Ruth DeWitt, 6289 Serena, stated she is concerned about the levee and debris basin. She didn't know why they would put more homes in when there is not enough schools for the kids already. C16. Tina Pringle, Madderhorn St., did not know why the City would want to remove the levee and take the chance of this being an unsafe situation. C17. Terry Norca asked that the Council not let the residents down. She asked that they grant a new study. C18. Joseph Baca, 10817 Carriage stated he cannot believe that the Council would do what they are doing to prevent any future studies on the levee. He stated safety is a big issue and that the Council should give the people what they want which is an independent study. C19. John Lyons stated he has lived in Rancho Cucamonga since 1975 and related his view on past rains and the drainage coming down the mountain. C20. Doug Craimer, 4949 Clover, stated he suppods Mr. Hawkins and his agenda. He asked that everyone come up to the site and view the levee. C21. Stacy Edgar stated the residents make up the City and does not see why it is such a big deal to get the study done. C22. Maureen Sampson asked if there is a consensus to present the letter from the LA Army Corp to the Washington, D.C. office for their opinion. Mayor Pro Tern Williams and Councilmember Dutton both stated they are willing to submit the letter to Washington, D.C. for them to determine if the letter is correct and if they feel a safety study is needed and then they can do one. Mrs. Sampson stated she feels they should request an independent study, not just pass along the November 2 letter alone and see if they concur. Kevin Ennis, Deputy City Attorney, stated because this is a matter of litigation, whatever material the City sends the Washington, D.C. office will be made pad of the litigation to characterize the City's position. He felt it was very important the Council be cautious to this request. He felt if it is the Council's request to forward the November 2 letter of the Army Corp to the Washington, D.C. office to ask for their review and analysis to determine if it is appropriate, in their opinion, and to possibly warrant additional review. He felt at this point this is all the City can do. Mrs. Sampson stated they are not going to stop litigating until the safety issue is taken care of. Mayor Pro Tem Willjams stated the City has to be careful what they are saying because of the litigation. Councilmember Dutton stated he will do whatever is necessary to make sure this community is safe. C23. Mr. Hawkins stated he does not see why anyone cannot ask for a safety study. He felt the letter was worthless. He asked before the City sends a letter to Washington, D.C. that it be made public first. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 5 Councilmember Dutton stated he felt if they determine the information in the November 2 letter is incorrect, he would automatically demand that an independent study be conducted. He asked Mr. Hawkins to forward a letter to him expressing exactly what he wants and he will forward it on to the Army Corp. Mr. Hawkins stated he would do this. Councilmember Dutton stated he cannot do this from the entire City Council, but he would do this as an individual. C24. Marcus Kapetian stated he opposes the levee and supports Mr. Hawkins. C25. Ron Bradshaw of Etiwanda Historical Society, invited everyone to the open house of the Chaffey Garcia House. He talked about all of the activities planned for the event which would take place on November 20 from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. A recess was taken at 9:05 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Willlares called the meeting back to order at 9:17 p.m. with all councilmembers present except Mayor Alexander and Councilmember Curatalo. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 1999. D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/27/99 and 11/3/99 and Payroll ending 10/24/99 for the total amount of $2,915,476.02. D3. Approval to amend the City's Compensation and Classification Plan by deleting and replacing certain outdated classifications. D4. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project, located from approximately 600 feet west of Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue north to Church Street, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9824 (RE: Also funded by RDA Account No. 15-51000). RESOLUTION NO. 99-243 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIRDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D5. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to Cielito Street, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9518. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 99-244 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERYL STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO CIELITO STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D6. Approval to appropriate $45,833.00 and approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for Contract 99- 036 for Construction Surveying on the Day Creek Boulevard and the Relocation of Highland Avenue, to be funded from the fund balance of Fund 22 to be placed in Account No. 22-4637-9710. D7. Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15282, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Aspen Avenue, submitted by S & D Rancho Cucamonga, California, LTD. RESOLUTION NO. 99-245 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15282 RESOLUTION NO. 99-246 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15282 D8. Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Terra Vista Park Improvements related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 99-247 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PARK SECURITY FOR ALL INTERIOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PARKVVAY IMPROVE-MENTS AND SIGNALIZATION, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 D9. Approval to enter into an Access and License Indemnity Agreement (CO 99-102) between the City of Rancho Cuoamonga and Cox Communications PCS, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, for the purpose of allowing Cox Communications and their consultants access to Heritage Park to conduct feasibility tests to determine the feasibility of installing wireless communication facilities. D10. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-103) for janitorial services for citywide facilities to Coastal Building Services of Fountain Valley, in the amount of $171,720, to be funded from Fund 01-4648-6036. D11. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO 99-104) between the State of California (State), the San Bernardino County Transpodcation Authority (Authority), the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page ? (City) and the County of San Bernardino (County) for construction of Segment 5 of State Route 30 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. 99-248 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (CITY) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (COUNTY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 5 OF STATE ROUTE 30 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D12. Approval to accept the Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 370 feet west of Santa Anita Street to 1600 feet east, Contract No. 99-021 as complete, release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $229,692.05, appropriate $5,772.64 from the fund balance of Fund 10 to be placed in Account No. 10-4637-9707 and approve Contract Change Order No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 99-249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM 370 FEET WEST OF SANTA ANITA STREET TO 1600 FEET EAST, CONTRACT NO. 99-021 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D13. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance and Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for MDR 97-11, located at 12550 Arrow Route, submitted by Aire Liquide. RESOLUTION NO. 99-250 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMQNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-11, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D14. Approval to accept a Surety Rider, reducing the Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 15875-1, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. D15. Approval to accept the FY 1998/99 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay, various locations, Contract No. 99-041 as complete, release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $246,547.08. RESOLUTION NO. 99-251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE 1998/99 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 8 REHABILITATION-OVERLAY, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 99-041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract Map 13565-6 and -7, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, located at Twenty-Fourth Street and San Sevaine Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 99-252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565-6 AND -7 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Alexander and Curatalo absent). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY ~ A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre)- APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071-01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 611 through 617. ORDINANCE NO. 611 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 9 E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Foudh and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page 10 ORDINANCE NO. 612 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 613 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 614 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 615 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 616 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page ~. ~. SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-10 ORDINANCE NO. 617 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 611 through 617. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Alexander and Curatalo absent). F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No items submitted. G, PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH- OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO; AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LEASH OPTIONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY-OWNED PARK Staff report presented by Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 618. ORDINANCE NO. 618 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,_AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LEASH OPTIONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY-OWNED PARK City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page t2 MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 618 for the December 1, 1999 meeting and to approve Resolution No. 99-253. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Alexander and Curatalo absent). H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS No items submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARK AND FACILITIES UPDATE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Central Park Windrows Park Church Street Park Ellena Park Golden Oak Park Lions West Community Center Heritage Community Park Red Hill Community Park Etiwanda Creek Community Park Lot G Facility B. COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Seniors Youth Activities Teens Youth Sports RC Family Spods Center Adult Sports Trips and Tours Human Services Facilities Community Wide Special Events Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy Contract Classes The Grapevine Park and Recreation Commission Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Volunteers ACTION: Report received and filed. City Council Minutes November 17, 1999 Page ]3 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public, L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Biane, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss Property Negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property located at Rochester between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; Jack Lain, City Manager, and Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, Negotiating Party, regarding terms of payment. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Alexander and Curatalo absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:33 p.m. No action was taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** December 1, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Reqular Meetinq A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, December 1, 1999, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Agencymembers: Bob Dutton, Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Absent were Agencymembers: Biane and Curatalo. Also present were: Staff present: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, RDA Director; Cathy Wahlstrom, RDA Analyst; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Brad Buller, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; City Planner; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Sid Siphomsay, Information Systems Analyst; Charles Scott, St. Information Systems Specialist; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Jack Lam, City Manager, announced that an Executive Session needs to be added to the agenda (see "Adjournment" for description). MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to add the Executive Session. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). B2. Mayor Alexander read a statement into the record, which is on file in the City Clerk's office. He stated this is also a press release. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, displayed a map indicating the area referred to. Mayor Alexander asked James Markman, City Attorney, how far might the control of any building and/or operations go in the district should the study take place. James Markman, City Attorney, stated that as we understand our instructions, if one of these agencies upon whom we have relied to build and certify the adequacy of these facilities reconsiders what they have said to us, then his view is, at least arguably, the City has a substantial basis to consider any construction activity or development activity in the area afiegedly protected by this levee as being in harms way. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 2 He stated we have to have such a basis to take the kind of action the Mayor is suggesting in his statement. He stated let's assume we get over that hurdle and even assume that the Council by policy is ready to accept the potential inverse condemnation actions that could ensue. He added the Council would have a pallet of choices to make as to what they mean by what activities they want to preclude. He stated the easy one to him was any construction, even an approved project, where no building permits have been issued, even if some grading has occurred because of a legal precedent under case law. He stated they could go further than this and decide that even if somebody is past that point and is under construction or even to the point where they are ready to occupy a facility, and if the Council feels there is a substantial basis that these people would be moving into harms way that they could even shut down the issuance of certificates of occupancy or even those building permits necessary to finish a project already under construction. He stated there is a range of choices that will be presented to the Council if they get to this point. He stated it would be a policy decision for the Council to make. He stated these would all be options if the Council is put in the position by one of these agencies of not being able to continue to rely on what they have said. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC James Markman, City Attorney, stated he will instruct the Council that this is the time for public comments and not have the Council get into a debate as was done at the last meeting. C1. Robert Christiano hoped that the Council does not pass a moratorium. He stated he did not want the public to feel afraid. He stated there is nothing called a Deer Creek Levee. He indicated from a map that the DeedDay Creek Levee would not be removed. He continued to clarify the size of the levee in the Lauren project. C2. Kathy Wyant, Ginger Court, presented a video about the drainage and flood control for the northern part of the City. C3. Frank Willlares gave background information about himself as it relates to public safety. He felt there were false charges being made that the Council is not doing their job to protect the health, safety and welfare of the people of the City. He stated this is not a safety issue, but felt people just didn't want other people to move close to their homes. He felt this is ridiculous and did not agree with all of the lawsuits that had been filed. C4. John Allday displayed engineered drawings pertaining to the height of the levee. He stated they want to show that the statements being made are true as far as the height of the levee. C5. Bill Hawkins stated he would be happy to meet anyone out there to show that the levee is 40'. He stated this is a safety issue and not that they don't want people to build homes next to them. He added he appreciated the Council really trying to find out what is going on. He asked people in the community to find out what is going on by asking questions. C6. Malon Sampson read a letter into the record which is on file in the City Clerk's office, that was from Senators Boxer and Feinstein to the Army Corp of Engineers asking them to check into the safety of the levee removal matter. He felt the safety should be certified. He stated he also has a copy of Councilmember Dutton's letter and he thanked him for following through. C7. Fred Baldau felt the Council should have got a second opinion instead of just taking Mr. Markman's advice. He asked that the levee matter be looked into. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 3 C8. George Georgiou asked why the Council does not now answer his question why they will not hear his appeal. He asked that the Council hear his appeal according to the law that was in effect when he first filed his appeal. C9. John Lyons stated he came in with a major public safety issue to the City and that everyone very quickly responded to him. He stated he is with an organization called SOC (save our children). He stated they are concerned about the kids having to use the freeway to get to school. He mentioned that on January 11, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., at City Hall, there will be a Route 30 Task Force meeting and asked for everyone to be there. He appreciated the City's help with his issue. C10. Bill Hawkins felt the City Manager, City Attorney and staff have led the Council astray. He asked that Mr. Markman be removed as the City Attorney when his contract is up. Cll. Tom Bradford, 5066 Granada, thanked Councilmember Dutton for writing the letter as he promised at the last meeting. He thanked the Council for the letter that was read into the record. He asked that the replacement channel be agendized for the Council to discuss. C12. C13. Maureen Sampson, 4965 Calico, stated she appreciated Councilmember Dutton writing the letter as he promised at the last meeting. Malissa McKeith, 4993 Ginger Court, also had a copy of the letter sent by Senator Boxer and Feinstein to the Army Corp, which she referred to. She also had other pieces of information that was given to Councilmember Williams to be distributed to all of the Council, which is also on file in the City Clerk's office. She asked that the BIA join them in their efforts and ask Mr. Christiano to build his homes somewhere else. C14. Tom McGruder, Compass Rose, stated his concern was the rain that might occur in the future and the damage it might cause to the City. C15. A man (did not give his name) stated he hoped that every inch of the City is built on except for the Lauren property. C16. Erin Neff advised the Council that a stop sign is needed at the corner of Sapphire and Orchard because she felt it was unsafe. She asked if this could be looked in to. Mayor Alexander stated the Traffic Engineering Division would check this out. A recess was taken at 8:10 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 8:25 p.m. with Councilmembers Dutton, Willlares and Alexander present. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Approval of Minutes: October 6, 1999 October 20, 1999 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 11/9/99 and 11/17/99 and Payroll ending 11/7/99 for the total amount of $1,556,247.79. D3. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Rockys Pizza (transfer of license; new owner), Hak Yol Lee, 9615 Foothill Blvd. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 4 D4. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale Beer and Wine for Chicos Tecae Grill (transfer of license; new owner), Lorraine Evelyn Obeid, 11815 Foothill Blvd., Unit "E." D5. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Chevron 9-4863 (transfer of license), Chevron Stations, Inc., 8687 Base Line Rd. D6. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BYCOUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. D7. Approval to appropriate $297,000.00 ($270,000.00 plus 10%) and approve Contract Change Order No. 5 for Contract No. 99-078 for Installation of Fibre-Optics Conduit and Electrical Outlet System in the Foothill BIvd. Median currently under construction by Terra-Cal Construction, Inc., from Vineyard Avenue to approximately 600 feet west of Hermosa Avenue, to be funded from Account No. 74-4225- 7044 (Re: Also funded by RDA Account No. 15-51000). D8. Approval of a Resolution of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cedifying that Rancho Cucamonga has the resources to fund the matching funds for the Bike Lane Upgrade Project for Haven Avenue and Milliken Avenue as submitted for the congestion mitigation/air quality program and affirming its commitment to implement the project in accordance with the schedule as submitted. RESOLUTION NO. 99-254 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAS THE RESOURCES TO FUND THE MATCHING FUNDS FOR THE BIKE LANE UPGRADE PROJECT FOR HAVEN AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE AS SUBMITTED FOR THE CONGESTION MITIGATION/AIR QUALITY PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING ITS COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE AS SUBMITTED D9. Approval of Map and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Parcel Map 15346, located on the west side of Anaheim Place and Azusa Court, north of 6th Street, submitted by General Dynamics Properties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 99-255 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15346 AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT D10. Approval of a Resolution authorizing the destruction of City Records pursuant to California Government Code Section 34090, the City's Records Retention Schedule, and other applicable legal citations. RESOLUTION NO. 99-256 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS SET FORTH IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 AND OTHER APPLICABLE LEGAL REFERENCES Dll. Approval of a Resolution in support of Proposition 12, the Safe Neighborhood Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection State Bond Act of 2000, that will be on the March 2000 ballot. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 99-257 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 D12. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has the resources to fund the projects submitted for inclusion in the FY 2000/2001-2005/2006 Transportation Improvement Program and affirming its commitment to implement all of the projects submitted in the program. RESOLUTION NO. 99-258 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HAS THE RESOURCES TO FUND THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED FOR INCLUSION IN THE FY 2000/2001- 2005/2006 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND AFFIRMING ITS COMMITMENT TO IMPLEMENT ALL OF THE PROJECTS SUBMITTED IN THE PROGRAM D13. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates (CO 99-105) to perform financial advisor services in conjunction with a proposed Community Facilities District (South Etiwanda) in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for formation services and not to exceed $31,500 for debt issuance services; to be funded by the project developer. D14. Approval of a Professional Services Agreement with Bruce W. Hull & Associates (CO 99-106) to perform appraisal services in conjunction with a proposed Community Facilities District (South Etiwanda) in an amount not to exceed $25,000, to be funded by project developer. D15. Approval to accept bids received and award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99- 107) to the lowest responsible bidder, D & J Foothill Electrical Contractors, Inc., of LaVerne, California, in the amount of $79,970.00 ($72,700.00 plus 10% contingency) for the installation of Park Walkway Lighting in Church Street Park, to be funded from Fund 20 (20-4532-9908). D16. Approval to accept the bids received, waive an inconsequential irregularity in bidder No. 2's bid and award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-108) in the amount of $191,304.74 ($173,913.40 plus 10% contingency) to the apparent low bidder, Gentry Brothers, Inc., for the construction of the Rancheria Drive Street Improvements, to be funded from Community Development Block Grant Funds, Account No. 28-4333-9923. D17. Approval of Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for a diversion facility to be constructed within Lots 95 to 100 of Tract 13812 and release of the previously approved Improvement and Maintenance Agreement for a detention basin, generally located on the south side of Summit Avenue west of Etiwanda, submitted by Wealth V, LLC - APN's: 225-411-01 to 21; 225-421-01 to 38; 225-431-01 to 83; 225-441-01 to 11. RESOLUTION NO. 99-259 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR A FACILITY TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON LOTS 95 THROUGH 100 OF TRACT 13812 AND City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 6 RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR A DETENTION BASIN SUBMITTED BY WEALTH V, LLC - APN: 225-431-44 THROUGH 49 D18. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DR 96-34, submitted by BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, located on the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Utica Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 99-260 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 96-34 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D19. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Parcel Map 13845, submitted by Masi Commerce Center Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 99-261 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 13845 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D20. Approval to authorize the acceptance of Replacement of Drinking Fountains Project for various City Parks, Contract No. 99-063 as complete, and release the bonds and approve the final Contract amount of $70,248. RESOLUTION NO. 99-262 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ADA DRINKING FOUNTAINS AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Willlares to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of item 6. Motion carried unanimously, 3- 0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). DISCUSSION OF ITEM D6. Approval to declare Surplus Miscellaneous City-Owned Equipment. Councilmember Willlares clarified what was in the staff report. She wanted to make sure that the equipment is offered to schools or sold to someone else before it is made into scrap. Jack Lam, City Manager, confirmed this was true. MOTION: Moved by Willlares, seconded by Alexander to approve item D6. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 7 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH- OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 618. ORDINANCE NO. 618 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA.,_AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 618. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS No Items Submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 - 99 CENTS ONLY STORES - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to uphold the City Planner's conditions of approval for a 99 Cents Store, a retail store within the neighborhood commercial district, located at 9640 Base Line Road -APN: 202-161-40. RESOLUTION NO. 99-263 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE CITY PLANNER'S DECISION IN APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-22 WITH CONDITIONS FOR A 99 CENTS ONLY STORE, LOCATED AT 9640 BASE LINE ROAD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 202-161-40 G1. Staff report by Donald Granger, Planning Technician, who stated the applicant is withdrawing one of their items of appeal which is the store front glass matter. Councilmember Williams stated other businesses have not been held to the two color signs and asked why they can't have three colors. Brad Buffer, City Planner, stated there are a lot of illegal signs throughout the center and they have asked for the landlord of the center to comply with the City's current sign regulations. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 8 Councilmember Williams felt there was more problems in this center than just one single sign. She stated she did not want to change the whole sign ordinance. Mayor Alexander opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing the City Council were: Wes Fifield of the 99 cent store stated they respect their opinion and that they want to help the center out also. Mayor Alexander suggested this be continued for two weeks to further look into this matter. Mr. Fifield stated they are willing to work with the Council and help the center to conform to the sign regulations. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he did not think two weeks was long enough to get something resolved. He suggested they be able to open the store now and that the appeal for the three-colored sign be denied, but that they work with staff and the landlord to try to get the center in compliance with the sign ordinance, but that any future appeal fees would be waived. MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to approve Resolution No. 99-263 with the provisions as stated by Brad Buller, City Planner, above. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. DEMONSTRATION OF THE INTERNET (Oral) Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this item would not be heard this evening, but would return at a future meeting. H2. HISTORY OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE Staff report by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Councilmember Dutton felt the report was very complete. He asked how many of the 8,000 acres have been annexed into the City. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated almost 800 acres. Councilmember Dutton asked if there were currently projects through the County that were under construction, and how many acres that included. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated yes there were and that it included between 250 and 400 units or approximately 150 acres. Councilmember Dutton asked when a property is annexed, what is the process that the City is having to go through if it has already received a tentative approval from the County. He asked what kind of challenges this presents. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated once a project has some level of entitlement through the County, they bring that to the City as a negotiating point. He stated their goal is to retain as much of that approval entitlement as possible. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 9 He stated in the past that has meant that the City accepts possibly density and lot layouts. He stated what the City has resolved to accept would be the design that is the architectural vocabulary of what the buildings look like and the setting of those buildings on the land itself. Councilmember Dutton asked if it was mostly aesthetics and design concepts that the City has its challenges, or is it density. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated density has not been one where the applicant, once they get their entitlement through the County, has been willing to release. He stated there have been aesthetic issues, but there has also been some infrastructure issues and maintenance district issues to address in those negotiations. Councilmember Dutton asked why once a project has gone through the County process for approval, would the City care about annexing it into the City, or why would the City care about doing this. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he felt the City has always been concerned that if a resident is near our City, but actually in the County area, their emergency services are different, recreational services are different, and probably the most critical issue is the traffic issue related to the number of homes that could be built up there and the movement of the traffic through City streets to get to and from this area. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated a concern of the City is that they would be using the City facilities, streets, storm drains, etc., but would not be paying that and this would become a burden on the existing system. Councilmember Dutton asked if the County builds their roads to different specifications than the City does. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is true and that the City has got them to build their roads to our specifications but not without a struggle. Councilmember Dutton asked what kind of challenges should the Fire Board be aware of with regards to development that takes place in the sphere of influence. Dennis Michael, Fire Chief, stated the sphere of influence is in the Fire District's boundaries. He stated as far as fire district planning they do include the sphere of influence as far as station locations and response to emergencies. He added they do have challenges when it comes to approving development in this area. He stated that affects street widths, street standards, and issues that involve traffic circulation that the City doesn't have any control over. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated every City Council since the City incorporated has felt the sphere of influence was important, and that the City should have a say-so in the planning of this area so that it would be developed with the same standards as Rancho Cucamonga is built. Councilmember Dutton asked why the area was not included in the City's boundaries when the City incorporated. Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated they tried to use the boundaries they felt would win the election to incorporate. Mayor Alexander stated Jon MikeIs was very much an advocate for the City's sphere as it was when he was on the City Council. He felt something in writing from Supervisor MikeIs would be a good idea. Councilmember Dutton asked if the city is doing anything to encourage annexation into the City. City Council Minutes December 1, 1999 Page 10 Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, stated he has just sent a letter out identifying the positives for annexing this area into the City. Councilmember Dutton stated he is encouraged with Supervisor MikeIs' comments of support for Rancho Cucamonga. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS No Items Submitted. J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. L. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Dutton to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss property negotiations per Government Code Section 54956.8 for property generally located at the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Milliken Avenue; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Director, and Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director, negotiating parties, regarding terms of agreement. Motion carried unanimously, 3-0-2 (Biane and Curatalo absent). The meeting adjourned at 9:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: ** December 7, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Tuesday, December 7, 1999, at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 9:30 a.m. by Mayor William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Paul Biane, Bob Dutton (met at the Cerritos Performing Arts Center at 10:45 a.m.), Diane Williams, and Mayor William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; and Brad Buller, City Planner. Absent was: Councilmember James Curatalo B. ITEM OF BUSINESS 1. FIELD TRIP TO CITY OF CERRITOS TO TOUR CULTURAL FACILITIES After the meeting convened, the City Council and staff present boarded a van and departed for the City of Cerritos Cultural Facilities. They arrived at the location at approximately 10:45 a.m. Upon their arrival, they met with the Director of Community and Cultural Services for an informational briefing and a question and answer period. Next, a tour of the facility was given. The group departed the City of Cerritos at approximately 1:15 p.m. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC NO communication was made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT The group arrived back at the Civic Center at 2:30 p.m. and the meeting adjourned. Sincerely, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk GROWTH NEWS A Publication of the California Building Industry Association January S, 2000 AB 1219 TO BE HEARD Links Growth to Water Guarantee Opposition Letters Needed :M3 1219 (KueM), a bill that would eliminate the abiht)' of a ciW or count)' to approve a residential development project of 200 units or more unless it can expressly guarantee that the existing residents and businesses wall not sufl~r from future multi-year droughts, will be heard in the Assembly Local Government Comnuttoe on Wednesday', Janum'y 12. The bill is a thinly disguised attempt to put an end to residential construction by severely limiting the ability, of local governments to approve apartment. condominium, and single-family housing projects of 200 units or more. Rather than focusing on the ve~' real and fi. mdamental problem of the need for the development of new water supplies to meet current demand and furare needs, AB 1219 would place a new and unattainable standard into the pr6ject approval process instead of providing ways for water agencies, local governments, and the state to increase the supply of water so that all water users - now and in the future - have a reliable supply ofwator. AB 1219 is the first CBIA dream killer to be heard in 2000 It is cracial that the homebuilding industry' send a strong message on this no grm~lh measure to the members of the :Assembly' Local Government Corertattoo. For further information about who to contact, and for draft letters of opposition to AB 1219, please contact CliffNIoriyama, Legislative Actvocate for CBIA, at (916) 443-7933 or by e-mail at cmorivama!i~cbia org HOUSING CRISIS Southern California Style A recent flier was circulated by WNC & Associates that documents some of the alarming statistics of the housing crisis is Southem California. Rents Out of Reach 40% offarmlies in Southland cannot afford to rent a decent 2-bedroom apartment To a~brd that apartment, a working family would need to earn an hourly wage of' · $17. 94 to pay $933/month rent in Los Angeles · $1744 to pay $907/month rent in Orange County, · $14.81 to pay $770month rent in San Diego · $12 50 to pay' $650/month rent m Raverside/sB Homeownership Out of Reach An ent~'-level elemental' school teacher in San Diego earns $28!000 per year. To afford the media-prices home in San Diego ($200,000), she would need to earn $53,120/year Median Priced Homes: $250,000 m Orange Count)' $226,000 in Ventura CounW $200,000 in San Diego Count)' $166,000 in Los ,3inSoles Count)' Housing=Jobs, but Do Jobs=Housing? C~,'er 870,000 new jobs are expected ~' 2002, representing an estimated homing need of 1~450,000 tanits by 2003 to meet demand However, housing production is laggng 50% below production levels in the 1980s In Southem Califomia alone, the housing deficit is expected to reach 300,000 units by 2003 The high housing cost associated with growing demand and tightening supply' will limit the abili~' of employers to recruit workers and push w-orkers further from job centers. Job Growth 95-02 L4 Orange RiversideSB # of new jobs 485,300 170,900 175,500 % increase 13% 15 % 13.4~ ~ Housing Need Ne~v Units ~' '03 203,509 77.038 169,524 Permits (90-97) 93,483 73,698 123,799 Estimated ('00-'03) 75,000 27,000 48,000 Expected Deficit 128,000 50,000 120,000 Total Regional Deficit: ~,500,000 PROP 26 FUNDRAISING EFFORT UNDERWAY Majority Vote for School Bonds needs your support. THE CORNER NE~/SSTANT} Following is a synopsis of media coverage of the growth isiue across the state and nation. For full copies of the articles, visit the web addresses posted, or contact CBL~. at 916443-7933 > "Brm~ Changing Oakland, but some residents don't like it." San Jose Mercury News, l;hVO0. Article highlighting the ~nanaal ~mpact of smart growth on affordable housing in urban areas. vagv=.m._gycun'center corrt'oremiu~__!~Nert35~4 htm A Smart Growth Policy Begins with a Smart Hoasing Policy California Building Induslry Association · 1215 K Slreet, Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA 95814. 9161443-7933 · Fax 916/443-1960. www cbia org WILLIAM E. HAWKINS 4987 Ginger Ct. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91737 January 5, 2000 Mayor Alexander City OfRancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Mr. Mayor, I appreciate your time yesterday regarding the Deer Creek Levee. I would like to take this opportunity to respond to a couple of comments you made and provide you with information that you said you did not have. I will state up front that it concerns me that staff is not getting you and the city council all pertinent documents. You stated yesterday that the County did not need to provide a flood inundation map, as the debris basin is not a dam. Deer Creek is considered a jurisdictional dam. Attached are letters from the Office of Emergency Services advising the County that they MUST complete the maps for Deer Creek by March 1, 2000 and from Ken Miller of the County indicating that the District will do the maps. In response to the letter from the Los Angeles District of the Army Corps, let me state for all of you, that the Washington office is absolutely going to conduct the detailed study that the Senators requested and FEMA will be reevaluating the situation. If you really took an objective look at matters, you would see this is an extremely dangerous situation, not some game about Cristiano's houses. Sure there are people in Haven View that do not like the houses. I don't think the City can possibly believe that we have spent this much time and energy over a silly issue. People's lives are at risk. If your staff were completely honest with you, you would see that most in jeopardy are the new Estates at Deer Creek, Compass Rose, Banyon School and the houses south of Banyon School where my mother lives. I need to point out just one of many inconsistencies with the Army Corps letter. As you know, the City approved Cristiano's development based on the basin handling a 200 year event. We have argued for almost three years that this is not accurate. Now, after demanding, asking, arguing, and virtually begging you to look at the new data and request a new safety study; we, not the City Of Rancho Cucamonga got the Army Corp to reevaluate the situation and do a new safety study. The L.A. Army Corps letter is more fiction than science. The one good thing is they admitted the debris basin was calculated wrong. It only holds 50% of what they claimed previously. Unfortunately, they are still wrong. If they use the current USGS rainfall stats, then the debris basin is designed to hold a 40 - 50 year event. They used the old outdated rainfall figures! At what time does someone say "You folks are right, we have a serious problem here." This 200 year event debris basin keeps getting smaller and smaller. If you then factor in the other mistakes or r miscalculations in their letter, it is obvious to the simplest of minds - THERE IS A REAL DANGER! I continue to be extremely concerned that City staff has never questioned the Flood Control District or the Army Corps about the safety of this situation. It should not be that private citizens have had to fight this long. Its time our City Council was on the side of safety and its citizens - not some wealthy developer from Newport Beach. We have legitimate concerns. The City looks ridiculous when we had to go to two U.S. Senators because our own elected officials would not help. Their assessment of local government ranged from disbelief to amazement. I will also take this opportunity to ask why is the City dragging its feet on producing documents asked for almost three weeks ago? We received certain non-controversial documents, but still have not received a statement of attorney's fees pertaining to this matter, the City's development agreement with Cristiano, and the correspondence between the City and the police conceming the fire above Haven View. When will we get them? Given the conduct of staff, I find it difficult to trust the City and particularly Jim Markman who has made a fortune giving you bad advice. If the City really wants to help, you need to go to the Flood Control District and negotiate a land swap or arrange for the buy-back of Cristiano's property. It's not up to us to negotiate or facilitate a resolution. We did not create the safety issues and this would not gotten out of hand had the City acted responsibly in the first place. Mr. Mayor, I am a betting man. The levee is not going anywhere. The one thing I am not willing to bet on is people's lives. The City shouldn't either. William E. CC: Ms. Dianne Williams Mr. Paul Biane Mr. Bob Dutton Mr. Robert Curatalo TRANSPORTATION/FLOOD CONTROL RECE;V~-5 DEC - 9 1S,q9 December 8, 1999 Malissa Hathaway McKeith Loeb & Loeb, LLP 1000 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1800 Los Angeles, CA. 90017-2475 MHM File: 1-506/1.00 Re: Zone 1. Deer Creek Debris Basin, C/E Dear Ms. Mc. Keith: In response to your letter of November 15, 1999. regarding flood inundation maps, be advised that District staff is presently preparing a "Request for Proposals" to hire a consultant to prepare a study including inundation maps. It is anticipated that the selection and hiring of a consultant will take about two months with the resultant study requiring four to six months to complete. We will provide you with the completed study as soon as it is available. If you have any further questions on this, please call me at (909) 387-2623. Sincerely, KEN A. MILLER Flood Control Engineer KAM/AMC Rob Mead, Govemor's Office of Emergency Services Denise Benson, County Office of Emergency Services Joe O'Neil. City Engineer. City of Rancho Cucamonga Pat Mead/Ken Guidry/Reading File STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF TH~ DI]~ECTOR GOVERNOR'$ OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES P.O. BOX 4~9047 RANCHO CORDOVA. CALIFOR~/IA 05741-964'; (916) 2S2-lSbS FAX: 262-2~37 GRAY DAVIS, Governor OES December 21, 1999 (916) 262-1706 Kenneth A. Miller Flood Control Engineer County of San Bemardino Transportation/Flood Control Department 825 East Third S~'eet San Bemardino, CA 92415-0835 Re: Inundation Map - Deer Creek Debts Basin Dear Mr. Miller: I am writing with regard to correspondence you recently sent addressed to Malissa McKeith, of Loeb and Loeb LLP, and copied to the Office of]emergency Services, concerning preparation of the referenced darn inundation map. In that letter you projected a time flame for completion of the map of between six and eight months. Government Code section 8589.5 became effective in 1973, and has since that time required the preparation of inundation maps as deftned in that section. The San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Dapav/ment was reminded by letter fi'om this office in March of 1999 of the necessity of complying with the cited Government Code provision. The maps required under California law are essential for the protection of the public safety and are used in designing emergency procedures for evacuation and control of populated areas located below dams subject to the foregoing requirement. They are also used to produce the Natural Hazard Disclosure Statements which inform potential property purchasers of inundation risks. For these reasons it is critical that a map be prepared in as short of time as possible. The Office of Emergency Services is unable to accept the time line the Dapaament has proposed for completion of the maps. We are cognizant of constraints affecting public agencies regarding the letting of contracts, but none the less believe the Department should be able to accomplish the task by March 1, 1999. We therefore are insisting that you develop a work completion schedule which would allow submission of the map to this office by that date, and further, that you provide us a copy of such schedule no later than January 7, 2000. Kenneth A. Miller December 20, 1999 Page 2. If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter ~u'ther, please feel free tO telephone me at 'the above number. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bob McI~echnie Staff Counsel c~: Charles S. Scolastigo, Esq. San Bemardino County Counsel Malissa Hathaway McKeith, Esq. Loeb & Loeb LLP Deborah Steffans Regional Administrator, OES Southern Region CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-06-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 12/08/99 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO HARM. AMTo 5121 DE VOOGNT, SCOTT J. 6277 GUZMANt LESLIE 4904 OTTe LAURA 21703 2733 6309 6226 21713 4450 21714 6100 36 6207 21718 6102 A CHRISTMAS TREE FARM ABC LOCKSMITHS ADAMSON. RONALD ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS ALVAREZ, BETHIA AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE ARCIAGAe MARICHELE AMMAN RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS AUDIO EDIT10NS B & A CONSTRUCTION B & K ELECTRIC NHDLESALE DADGE-A-NXNIT 4369 BRODART BOOKS 21717 CADE, DEBRA 21710 CAL SELECT BUILDERSe INC. 5164 CALIFORNIA LIBRARy ASSOCIATION 6735 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 21705 CAPITAL DRYWALL 21709 CAREER CONNECTIONS INCo 6659 CASTROt RAy 21708 CERTIFIED TOWING 21707 CHAPPIE CONSTRUCTION 21706 CHAUDHURI MEDICAL GRDUF 713 CHICK°S SPDRTING GOODS 21711 CHINA POINT 5958 CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS 6458 CHRISTIAN, AARON 6319 CHRONICLE BOOKS 76 CITY RENTALS 21720 CLANTONe ABBY 6660 CLASSIC CARRIAGES FOR ALL OCCASIONS 21719 COLSON & COLSON CONSTRUCTION 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 6105 CORDURAm ALDO 5849 CREATIVE MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS G~ CHECKI OVERLAP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 166192G 540.00 CONTRACT SERVICE 146193~ 77.50 ((( 146194 - 146437 ))) INSTRUCTOR SNR. EXERCISE CLASS # 146438~ 262°50 ((( 146439 - 146440 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146441 30o13 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 146442 32.09 INSPECTION SERVICES R 146443 566.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 146444 3,01B.51 RECREATION REFUND 166445 39.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 146666 28.80 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 166467 544,20 RECREATION REFUND I 146648 115.50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 166449 5e168.12 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES I 146450 4t690o00 . LIBRARY SUPPLIES 146451 8°58 DEPOSIT REFUND # 146452 ZmO00oO0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 146653 lelBS.ZO LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 146654 80°95 RECREATION REFUND 146455 35°00 LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 146456 856.32 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 146457 19.73 PARKING CITATION REFUND 146658 66.00 RECREATION REFUND 146459 40.00 RECREATION REFUND 146460 61.76 RECREATION REFUND 166661 50°00 ((( 166462 - 166465 LIBRARy SUPPLIES A 166466 18947.62 RECREATION REFUND 146467 56°00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146668 60.00 CALZF LIBRARY ASSOC MTG° # 146669 210.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 146470 309.Z3 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146471 68,11 6USINESS LICENSE REFUND 146472 23,75 RECREATION REFUND 146473 40.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146474 57.50 ~USINESS LICENSE REFUND 146475 60.75 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146476 12.50 RECREATION SUPPLIES 166477 369,11 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146478 86.82 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 146479 13,00 RECREATION REFUND 146480 43,38 RECREATION REFUND ~ 166481 413.12 E~UIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES 146482 51.60 CITATION FEE REFUND 146483 30,00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146486 795.00 OVERPAYMENT ON PLANCHECK 146485 imOO5.O0 SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 146486 10,798.67 RECREATION REFUND 146487 24.80 PROFESSIQNAL SERVICES 146488 2m125.00 ((< 146489 - 146490 )>> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-08-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 12/08/99 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo ANT. go CHECK~ OVERLAP 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS ~ 166491 13m033o31 239 O ~ K CONCRETE CO STREET MAINTENANCE 146492 614.I8 4545 OATAim INC- OFFICE SUPPLIES I 166693 lm761o61 5121 DE VOOGHTm SCOTT J. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 166494 560°00 4366 DEMCOm INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 166495 50°97 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE t 146496 IBIo54 5746 DIRECTV SUBSCRIPTION 166697 27°99 61116 DRAGONFLyER PRESS LIBRART BOOKS 166698 37°64 A205 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC, OFFICE EQUIPMENT 146699 58°95 977 E S R I, INC. SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 146500 ZO0.O0 6646 EL CHICANO NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENT 14650% 510o00 6524 ELLISON EDUCATIONAL EQUIPMENT INC, LIBRARY SUPPLIES # IA6502 86.20 5137 ENPIRE MOBILE HOME SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 146503 Am277o70 3312 ESKENAZIm NOISES REIMBURSEMENT 166506 50.00 229 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS IRRIGATION SUPPLIES ~ 146505 695.47 6914 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES . OFFICE SUPPLIES 146506 30.70 5917 FASTENAL CDMPANT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 166507 889.92 6161 FAXON ILLINOIS SERVICE CENTER LIBRARY SUBSCRIPTION 166508 9.52 IZ3 FEDERAL EXPRESS CaRP DELIVERY SERVICE # 146509 104.00 4371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 166510 216,76 61117 FLEMING, GRETCHEN RECREATION REFUND 146511 25.00 2840 FORD OF UPLANDe INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ~ 146512 6m535.80 6446 FORHA CONTRACT SERVICES 166513 9,983°50 5686 FRAME RATE CHAMELEON TELEVISION SYSTEM 146516 lm630.O0 1082 FRANKLIN COVEY CO, OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 1A6515 89,93 61118 GARCZA, JOHN RECREATION REFUND 146516 56.00 61119 GARMENm RUTH RECREATION REFUND 146517 75.00 41066 GIOELIm ADRIENNE RECREATION REFUND 166518 30,00 1265 GONSALVES ~ BONe JOE A. LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 166519 2,300,00 3827 GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 166520 467,65 61120 GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES, BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 166521 196B0,37 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 166522 248.96 6486 GUARDIAN MEDICAL PREMIUM 166523 692o16 6277 GUZNAN, LESLIE CONTRACT SERVICE 146526 161o55 6383 H.V. CARTER CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 1665Z5 401.Z0 5367 HAMNON ELECTRONICS MAINTENANCE 166526 308°80 32061 MAMSIKm ANITA RECREATION 166527 56°00 6376 HEINEMANN LIBRARY RECREATION REFUND 146528 112o05 5352 HEMBORG FORD VEHICLE PURCHASES 146529 64m204,12 32059 HERRON, ANN RECREATION 146530 64,00 616 HIGHSMITH CO,INCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 166531 169,5A 32056 HILLSIDE COVE REIMBURSEMENT OF OVERPMT. 166532 4.00 2255 HOLT°S AUTO ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 146533 91.59 ((( 16653A - 166535 6033 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 166536 2m063o18 3633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PROMS & EDUCATION MONTHLY SERVICES 146537 805.00 161 HOYT LUMBER CO., S.M. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 146538 21o80 6369 HUGHES, LASHONDAE RECREATION REFUND 166539 315o00 6457 HURLEYe ROGER RECREATION REFUND 166540 150.00 695 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTSw INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 166561 66,05 6188 I D BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 8 1A65AZ 63°30 i B | I I I I I J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 1Z-08-99 C99/00) RUN DATE: 12/08/09 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO HARM. ANT, 6150 IMAGE SALES, INC. 908 INLAND MEDIATION BOARD 6082 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGRS %558 INT'L RIGHT OF WAY ASSOCo 5616 ISA 6616 J A C 0 612 JAESCHKE INC.~ CoRD 32067 JIMENEZ, TOLANDA 6663 JORDANw JAN 32065 KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 6090 KONG, SOPMAK 32058 KORTEKAAS, PATRICIA 5366 KOTZIN & ASSOCIATES, R. 5549 L S A ASSOCIATES, INC. 32057 LAMBERT, PATRICIA 32I LANDSCAPE NEST, INC. 649 LANSON PRODUCTS, INCo 5512 LIBRARY VIDEO COMPANY S884 LILBURN CORPORATION 6189 LONG BEACH UNIFORM CO,w INCo 1655 LONG"S DRUGS 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTLo 3987 M M A S C C/O GRADUATE CENTER FOR 32062 MAGNUSEN, NANCY 549 HARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENToINC. 72 MARK CHRISm INC, 67Z7 MARSHALL PLUMBING 32063 MARTIN, STEPHEN 250 MARTINEZ TOWING AND AUTOMOTIVE 3871 MATTeS HARDWARE 3Z066 MENA, MICHAEL 3Z066 MENTOR USED OIL 2198 MICHAELS STORES INC. V30%9 6170 MICROAGE COMPUTERMART 5852 MIDNEST TAPE ZZ68 NAPA AUTO PARTS 76½ NATIONAL DEFERRED 23bl NEIPORT TRAFFIC STUDIES 5673 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL 5628 NOL~ PRESS 6853 OCLCe INCo 5Z3 OFFICE DEPOT 5661 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND LANDLORD/TENANT DESPUTE RESOLD RECREATION REFUND MEMBERSHIP DUES MEMBERSHIP RECREATION REFUND VEHZCLE MAINTENANCE RELEASE OF DEPOSIT RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES 8USENESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVECOS RECREATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6 WHITE MONGOOSE BICYCLES FILM PROCESSING RECREATION SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP DUES RECREATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REHABo PROGRAM RECREATION TOWING SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT MEETING RECREATION SUPPLIES 1986 CTE DUES LIBRARY SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DEFERRED COMP MAINTENANCE SECURITY SERVICE LIBRARY SUPPLIES CURE SERVICES CHARGES OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND SUBSCRIPTIONS-DUES PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR PAGING SERVICE MEMBERSHOP RENENAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 146558 - i A 166563 166566 166565 146566 166567 166568 146569 <<< 166579 69°00 697,00 115.00 680,00 173,00 183.00 352,00 10o00 680,00 36,00 10e066.65 9,077°50 17.00 ))> 729.81 66.85 6.18 AO.O0 56.00 91.55 296°09 56.00 90.00 62.27 190.00 63.94 880.91 686°70 597.76 ZO0,O0 667,50 58°80 125o90 2t306.90 59.3Z 1Z5.00 110.00 267,62 27,91 I ,! .I .I ,1 I I I I I .j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-08-99 (95/00) RUN DATE: 11/08199 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARRo AMY. ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 6656 PEROVICH, BRUCE RECREATION REFUND 166596 350.00 2587 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS MONTHLY SERVICE 166595 606.96 6168 PIRON, SHAUN CONTRACT SERVICES # 166596 336°00 1069 POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 146597 271o69 693 PONERSTRIDE BATTERy CO., INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 166598 680°76 2533 PRENTICE HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES I~6599 38.61 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR ~ I66600 463.64 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ I6660% 28°78 6335 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK SHARING AUTH CA. 2NO QUARTER PREMIUM DEPOSIT i66602 79m666.50 5163 PUBLISHERS QUALTIY LIBRARy LIBRARY SUPPLIES ~ 166603 256.11 32060 PUPBELLe CARLA RECREATION I66606 56.00 6615 QUAINTANCEm STEVEN RECREATION REFUND I66605 627°50 5699 QUALITy ONE ENGRAVERS OFFICE SUPPLIES I66606 32.33 Z66 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES 166607 67oll 128 RANCHO CUCA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCy REIMBURSE GRANT FUNDS 166608 11881 RANCHO VALLEy VOLLEYBALL CLUB . BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 166609 87.96 5513 RANDOM HOUSEm INC. LIBRARy SUPPLIES 166610 19o97 6130 PEN LUCK & KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLEES 146511 17.48 11862 RENAISSANCE MEDIAm INC LIBRARy SUPPLIES 166612 7,24 6093 RHINO LININGS OF RANCHO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 146613 391o63 5616 RZCHARDSm WATSONm & GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES 166616 15mBA6.27 11880 RND WORKS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 166615 16o90 626 ROBLESm RAUL P.m SRo TIRE REPAIR 166616 52.50 5924 ROGAN BUILDING SERVICES JANITORIAL SERVICE 166617 5m563o62 16 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 146618 66.88 6171 S & K ENGINEERS RECREATION REFUND # 146619 5mO00,O0 6117 S 8 & De INCo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 166620 11m617o00 11883 SAFETY NET BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 166621 9.61 2585 SAMPLESm RYAN MILEAGE REINBURSEMENT 146622 14.18 301 SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE I 146623 3m357o17 4350 SCHNEIDERWENTm KAREN LIBRART SUPPLIES 166626 10o56 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC, OFFICE SUPPLIES 166625 181,08 1819 SHARED TECHo FAIRCHILD TELECOMm INC TELEPHONE SERVICES 166626 lm683,33 11886 SHOOK PROPERTIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 146627 112o05 6616 SKILES, DEAN RECREATION REFUND 166628 600°00 1317 SNART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES B 166619 116o69 11885 SNYDER CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 166630 61o60 135 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDmINC REGISTRATION 166631 25°00 <(( 166632 - 166638 143Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ~ 146639 20m614o99 682 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER IN(:. VEHICLE NAZNT SUPPLIES/SERVICE 166660 165o90 5033 SPICER COMPUTER SUPPLIES ~ 166661 936°85 11886 SPRZNGERm ROBERT RECREATION REFUNDS 166662 56°00 902 STATE OF CArDEPARTMENT OF TRAMS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 146663 6m286o66 5410 T & D INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES 146666 90,00 2366 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL ~ 146665 TOED5 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAZNT SUPPLIES I66666 666°05 5980 TEN SPEED PRESS VARIOUS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 166647 162o88 4351 TOBINm RENEE RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT 166648 1ZoT7 5155 U S BANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT ~ 166649 29600.00 4558 U S GUARDS COem INC. SECURITY GUARD SERVICE # 146650 2m043,27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF NARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-08-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 12/08/99 PAGE: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO IARRo ANT, 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 4788 UNDERGROUND SVCo ALERT OF SO- CALIF 3637 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 5601 UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICESt INC. 6726 UNISOURCE CORPORATION 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE Z&BZ UNZTED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 11887 UNIVERSITY OF IOWA 881 VANCE CORPORATION 11888 VANDE STEEG CONSTRUCTION 6177 VXCKY*S FLOWER SHOP 699 VISION SERVICE PLAN - (CA) 5870 VLSYSTEMSt INCo Z13 WAXIEm KLEEN-LINE CORP 6577 NELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES 11889 WERTHEINm FRANCES 6662 WILLXAHSe NANCY 6436 WILSONm RYAN L 4827 WORLD BOOK DIRECT MARKETING 6652 WRIGHT CHOICE 509 XEROX CORPORATION 6605 VWCA OF THE WEST END 6283 ZDLEZIOm HZCKEY """' CNECK~ OVERLAP UHP SERVICES i 166651 3m068o25 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 146652 212o75 TOTAL CITY OF RANCHD CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-15-99 C99/00) RUN DATE: 12/15/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO WARRo AMTo · ~ CHECK8 OVERLAP 11576 SPENCER, KERRY 6150 IMAGE SALES, INC. 5956 IO0~ SOCCER 10 A C R TIRE SERVICE 10 A ~ R TIRE SERVICE 6451 A A AUTOMOTIVE ZITZA A-1 AUTO DIAGNOSTIC I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO.t INC. 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 7 ABLETRONICS 4367 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK 4373 ACO SANITATION 6309 ADAMSON, RONALD 5231 AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTINGt INCo 5509 AIR CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 1826 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Z1723 ALBERTSON'S FOOD CENTER ~1620 17 ALTA FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 5658 AMERICAN FIRST AID ~ SAFETY 16 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS 2437 ASSOCIATED GROUP 4036 ATLAS COPCO 402 AUTO RESTORATORS 4102 8 ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 6671 BAKER, ARLENE 33 OASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 6142 BASSETT-SHZTH, TERR[ 63Z3 BELLSOUTH WIRELESS DATA L.P. 11725 BERNAL, MANUEL ~461 BEST 8UY CO., INC. 1247 8LAKE PAPER CO., INC. 21726 80PP, ANNETTE LEE 1001 8URTRONICS 2161 BUSINESS ~ LEGAL REPORTS, INC. 6Z CALIFORNIA JOURNAL 21727 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MAINT.,INC. 1223 CALSENSE 3828 CAPITOL ENQUIRY, INC. 6~72 CAPPUCCINO PRODUCTIONS 6670 CARRSm THE 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ~88 CHEVRON U S Am INC 6658 CHRISTIAN, AARON 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIOm INC. RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND 141869~ 29.00 <<C 141870 - 146542 ))> 146563 69.00- <(< 146544 - 146675 >>) RECREATION SUPPLIES 146676 58.29 C(( 146677 - 146677 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 146678 2m683.04 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 166679 68.50 R~CREATION REFUND 166680 68.00 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND i~6681 25°00 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES e 146682 125.99 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES A 146683 228°20 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 146684 12.84 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 146685 49.99 E~UIPMENT RENTAL 166686 131,67 INSPECTION SERVICES ~ 146687 67Z.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 166688 2t250o00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERZOO: 12-1B-99 C99/00) RUN OATE: 1Z/1B/99 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR, AMTo 5337 COASTAL BUSINESS MACHINES 21722 CQMBEE ELECTRIC 643 COMPUTERLAND CUCAMDNGA CO WATER DIST D L B VISIONS D A R E AMERICA DAISY WHEEL RIBBON COt INC DAPPER TIRE OAY-TIMERSm INC. DEER CREEK CAR WASH DELTA DENTAL DERBISH GUERRA & ASSDCo DICKm ERIC DICK, ERIC DIETERICH-POST COMPANY DIVERSIFIED ADVERTISING NOVELTIES DOSS TENNIS COURTS DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING E S R Im INC. E-I RENTALS ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC, EVANS SPORTING GOODS OWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS FOOTHILL CELLULAR & PAGING FORD OF UPLAND, INC, FRISCO BAKING COo, INCo GALE GROUPm THE GILENO DISTRIBUTION GORDONt JAMES GROLIER PUBLISHING COMPANY GST TELECOM, INC. 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 6277 GUZMANm LESLIE 32068 HALLADAY INC, WAGNER 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. 3207I HOBBY SHACK INCo 4928 HOCKEY WEST 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CODe ENC° 3Z072 HOME TEAM SERVICE 6414 HOOOm KARYE 1234 HOSEMAN 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 161 HOYT LUMBER CO.m S.M, 6369 HUGMESm LASHONDAE · ~ CHECKm OVERLAP SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES SERVICE/REPAIRS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES/REPAIRS REGISTRATION DFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS CONTRACT SERVICES D.A,R,E. MATERIAL OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES DENTAL INSURANCE CONTRACT SERVICES EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES RECREATION RENTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES IRRIGATION SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND LIBRARY BOOKS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT LIBRARy SUPPLIES INTERNET SERVICES MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS CONTRACT SERVICE REIMBo OVERPAYMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 93/96 CDBG CONTRACT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND 146731 - R 146723 ZZZ.O0 146724 5.00 166725 3m816o19 146726 221.10 146727 h216.18 146728 125.00 146729 ImgB6o16 146730 150,B9 146733 146736 1ZtSIO.1Z 146735 300.00 166736 2mTBB,27 146737 765,03 166738 2,550.55 146739 46.29 146762 - CITY OF RANCMO CUCANONGA LIST DF HARRANT5 FOR PERIOD: 12-15-99 C99100) RUN DATE: 12/15/99 PAGE: 3 495 5535 167 836 3Z76 32073 31076 9Z 365Z 6616 1961 SA9 6727 250 5560 32083 3871 5168 31078 219B 6668 32070 3Z080 6669 523 HYDRO-SCAPE PRDDUCTSm ZNC HTPER TECHNOLOGIES 5~61 ORCHARD GUPPLY HARDMARE 3Z069 DRTIZm SAMANTHA 235 OWEN ELECTRIC Z921 P A P A 6287 PACIFICARE OF CALIFORNIA 1823 PAGENET 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS INC. 757 PEP BOYS ~ ~HECKi OVERLAP LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 166778 MAENTENANCE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP DUES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE BUSINESS LICENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND MAINT SUPPLIES REIMOURSEMENT VEHICLE SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OUSINES5 LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICESNE FILM PROCESSING BUSINESS LICENSE TELEPHONE SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICES ((< 166806 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REHAE, PROGRAM TOWING SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION SUPPLIES REIN0. MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN REIME. FOR FINGERPRINTS BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES (<( 166819 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REIMB. FOR FINGERPRINTS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR RECREATION REFUND (<( 166828 PAGING SERVICE CONCRETE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 166779 67,00 166780 21,55 166781 78,00 166782 76o3~ 166783 · 8,00 166786 106,50 166785 156,96 166786 28°00 166787 576°00 166788 61,17 166789 85°60 166790 207°86 166792 105o00 166793 166,68 166796 6BO.O0 166795 52°00 166796 36°33 166797 50.B2 1~6798 99,99 166799 ~8.12 166800 16,Z0 166801 lm610.56 166802 315o17 166803 7.50 166806 166806 3mSSTolE 166807 135.00 166808 13o66 166809 92°92 166813 100o61 1~6815 13.00 166816 228.67 166817 100.00 166818 569.33 166819 166820 1m185o9~ 1~6821 13o00 1~6823 27,00 16682~ 31m619°70 1~6827 136.65 CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OP WARRANTS FOR PERIO0:12-15-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 12/15/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMY, 6002 PERERAm MICHELLE 6lAB PIRONm SHAUN 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO 3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES 5776 PORAC 693 POWERSTRICE BATTERY CO., INCo 4401 PRAXAIR DISTRIEUTIDNm IMC, 3907 PRESORT PARTNERS 281 R & R AUTOMOTIVE 1038 R J M DESIGN GROUPm INC. 264 RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER 6292 REINHARDTm RITA 5814 REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 626 ROBLES, RAUL Pot 11890 ROSS DRESS FOR LESS ~212 32082 ROYAL PANOA 1ZgZ S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 5745 SAFELITE GLASS CORP. 4432 SAN BERN ASSOC GOVERNMENTS 11894 SANCHEZm ROBERT 11895 SCAREROUGH SISSON 32084 SCIURBAm KAREN 11896 SCOTT, KENNETH 2666 SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS 351 SIGN SHOPm THE 692 SIR SPEEDT 6416 SKILESm DEAN 6416 SKELESm DEAN 1327 SMART & FINAL 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. 319 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 143Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 682 SPEEDWAY MUFFLER INC, 2847 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT,m INC, 902 STATE OF CAmDEPARTMENT OF TRANS 3017 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3632 STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 3607 STREET TREE SENINAR 11891 SWEET SRm JON A 8410 T & O INSTALLATIONS ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND CONTRACT SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 6 SUPPLIES WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM DUES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL PRESORT MAIL SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES WANG COMPUTER SERVICE RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINT,SUPPLIES&SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES MEMOERSHIP MEETING RECREATION REFUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTS TiRE REPAIR BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION SUPPLIES SERVICE AND SUPPLIES GEN ASSESSMENT MEMBERSHIP DUES FINGER PRINT FEE REFUND DEPOSIT PERMIT RtFUNO RECREATION FINGER PRINT REFUND SIGNS MAINT SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION RDFUND RECREATION REFUND DAY CAMP SUPPLIES <<< MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS MONTHLY GAS 5ILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES/SERVICE SERVICE AND SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION TREE SEMINAR REIMB FINGER PRINTING SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES 166865 - 146868 - 14682.9 51,18 146830 240.00 146831 18,5Z5.27 146832 459,00 146833 340,00 l f l, I, I' CITY DP RANCHQ CUCAMDNGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 12-15-99 RUN DATE: 12/15/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo AMTo ~ CHECKt OVERLAP 6316 TURF PARTNERS RECREATION REFUND 146883 668,05 Z737 U C REGENTS POCKET GUIDE 14688A 395,00 5155 U S 8ANK TRUST LEASE PAYMENT 146885 3m450o00 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES ~ 146886 338°90 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 146887 16,92 3214 URISA MEMBERSHIP 146888 .20.00 5285 VIKING TIRE V~HICLE SUPPLIES # 146889 2,393o39 6220 WAL-MART RECREATION REFUND 146890 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES e 146891 688.91 11892 WELCMm RUSSEL PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 146892 lm326,00 11892 WELCHm RUSSEL PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 146893 250.00 5176 WEST END KIDS CLUB OF THE yMCA WEST END KIDS PROGRAM 1~6894 6181 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY RECREATION REFUND 146895 5o17 11695 WILLIAM, JAMES FINGER PRINT FEE REFUND 146896 13.00 6436 WILSDNm RYAN L RECREATION R~FUND A 146897 509 X~RDX CORPORATION COPY M&CMINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE 146898 977.45 348 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES { 146899 1,203o64 6283 ZOLEZIO, MICKEY ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT-OF-WAY ~ 146900 948.00 ~:~ TOTAL 433,72~o85 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 5, 2000 Mayor, Members of the City Council and Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil. City Eugineer Dawn Haddon, Jr. Buyer AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) INTERNATIONAL MODEL 2654-6X4, TEN WHEEL DUMP TRUCK FROM DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK SALES OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, THROUGH A PIGGY BACK/COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,669.07 FUNDED FROM TWO ACCOUNTS, 07-4647~7045 AND 09-4637-7045. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City CouuciI authorize the purchase of one (1) [nteruational Model 2654, 6X4 Tea Wheel Dump Track from Dieterich [nternational Truck Sales, Inc. of Colton, California, in the Amount of $95.669.07. This purchase is being offered throug!~ a piggy back/cooperative purchase agreement with Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District and funded from two accounts 07-4647-7045 and 09-4637-7045. Dieterich h~ternational Truck Sales was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder to the Elsiuore Valley Muuicipal Water District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council approved the purchase of the uew 10-wheel dump truck as identified in the fiscal year 1999/2000-budget document under accounts 07-4647-7045 and 09-4637-7045. Staff recently inspected a 10-wheel dump truck delivered to Elsiuore Valley Municipal Water District. After careful aualysis of the specification staff has opted to accept the piggy back/cooperative purchase agreement offered. with optionsl by Dieterich International Truck Sales, as meeting and or exceeding the specification staff was proposiug. ~Nei~;~ City Engineer WJO:dkh // THE CITY 0 F CUC_AMONGA SgfRe r DATE: Janua~ 5,2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: DISPOSITION OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY WITHIN TRACT 14380, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AND ETIWANDA AVENUES, SUBMI'FI'ED BY MASTERCRAFT CUCAMONGA I, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the disposition of City-owned property at the northwest corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to record the Quitclaim Deed. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14380 recorded in 1991. Lot A, as shown in Exhibit "B", was dedicated to the City in fee. On June 9, 1999. the Planning Commission approved Development Review 99-03, for phases 3 and 4 of Tract 14380, with a condition which stated "the paseo currently proposed between lots 22 and 23 shall be relocated to between lots 20 and 21 ." The developer has submitted Lot Line Adjustment 449 to relocate the property lines for lots 21, 22 and A. However, the City must first quitclaim Lot A, reserving easements for storm drain and waterline purposes. After the quitclaim and lot line adjustment record, the City will then accept the new paseo dedication. All these documents will be submitted to the County Recorder at one time. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:BAM:sd Attachments /2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION NORTH CITY OF ITEM: Tract 14380 TITLE: Vicinity MaD EXHIBIT: /3 RESOLUTION NO. ~ - ~19 / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO GUGAMONGA, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE QUITCLAIM DEED AND TO PRESENT THE SAME TO THE COUNTY RECORDER TO BE FILED FOR RECORD A. Recitals (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a fee interest in that certain parcel of real property generally located at the northwest corner of Wilson and Etiwanda Avenues in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and hereinafter referred to in this Resolution as "said property." A full, true and complete description of said property is set forth in that copy of deed attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and by this reference set forth herein. (ii) California Government Code Section 37350 provides as follows: "A City may purchase, lease, receive, hold, and enjoy real and personal property, and control and dispose of it for the common benefit." as follows: California Government Code Section 37351 provides in pertinent part, "The legislative body (City Council) may... dispose of, and convey such property for the benefit of the City...." (iv) The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga heretofore made the findings on November 10, 1999, that disposing of said property, as herein contemplated, would be in conformity with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (v) Said property was offered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in fee, for public utility, landscape, drainage and sidewalk purposes with the recordation of Tract 14380. The need for said property has been superceded by a condition of approval for Development Review 99-03 requiring the relocation of the paseo. (vi) Said property constitutes a burden on the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is no longer necessary or convenient for the purposes for which it was acquired. /,/ RESOLUTION NO. TRACT 14380 January 5, 2000 Page 2 (vii) Conveyance of said property will further the use of said property and benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga by deletion of a necessity to maintain said property. (viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. All facts stated in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution hereby are found to be true and correct. 2~ This Council hereby finds that the quit claiming of said property to the persons described in said deed will benefit the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the deed, a full, true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A', and cause the same to be recorded forthwith upon adoption of this Resolution. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Assessor Parcel No.: 225-461-61 RECORDING REQUESTED BY City of Rancho Cucamonga WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO Name: Street Address: City & State: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ COMPUTED ON FULL VALUE OF pROPERTY CONVEYED ' ORCOMPUTEDONFULLVALUELESSLIENSAND ' ENCUMBRANCES REMAINING ATT1ME OF SALE. Signature of Dectarant or Agent determining tax. Firm Name CORPORATION QUITCLAIM DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation under the laws of the State of California, hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to MasterCraft Cucamonga I, LLC A California Limited Liability Company That certain real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bemardino, State of Califomia, described and shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B". STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ) S.S. By: Attest: Mayor City Clerk a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal Signature FOR NOTARY SEAL OR STAMP EXHIBIT "A" LOT "A" - LOT 'A" OF TRACT 14380, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP BOOK 246 OF MAPS, PAGES 62-67 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL IS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HEREWITH AND BY TH/S REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED BY: VALLEY CONSULTANTS, INC. P. O. BOX 10516 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92658 (949) 650-5430 JAMES KAVIANI RCE 29329 /7 EXHIBIT "B" PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: VALLEY CONSULTANTS, INC. P. O. BOX 10516 NEWPORT BEACHs CA. 92658 (9~'9) 650--54.:50 JAMES KAVIANI R C E 29:529 o F C_UCAMONGA St3ffReport DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 5, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Vicki Chilicki, Engineering Technician APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE AMINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 99-32, LOCATED AT 9177 CENTER AVENUE RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the annexation of certain territory to Landscape Maintenance District 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos, 1 and 8, for MDR 99-32. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Minor Development Review 99-32, 9177 Center Avenue, (Parcel 2 Parcel Map 1892) generally located south of Seventh Street, on the east side of Center Avenue, was approved by the City Planner on August 18, 1999. The approval was for interior tenant improvements on an existing building and for the construction of exterior accessory equipment on 2.16 acres in Subarea 5 of the Industrial Specific Plan. A standard condition of approval requests the property owner to file with the City Engineer, a request to join the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts, prior to building permit issuance. Respectively submitted, Will;"'m~"~j.O~,Neil City Engineer WJO:VC:sd Attachments RESOLUTION NO. ~ - ~)~.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR MDR 99-32 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, Califomia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have flied with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT "A~ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND 6 Por,'l 2.16 AC RPN ~ 2.Oq- Z~,7..- Iq P/clR£F_L 2_ PM/~q2.. Par. 5 2,oo~. ~, ' pot. 6 o p_ooAc ~ ~ :Z: ~,,,. "'~3 ~'~ ,o,' STREET;' -- I~ - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOP, TII N D R' qq-.~ ,l.. 21 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: MDR 99-32 STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L SI N/A S6 N/A NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16~000L 22,000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf S.F. Non-Turf S.F. Trees Ea. N/A * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District DU or Parcel Acres S1 S6 L3B 2.16 2.16 2.16 2.16 Annexation Date: January 5, 2000 Form Date 11/16/94 CHO CUCAMONGA ENCINEERINC DEPARTMENT S tffRepo DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 5, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 99-32, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF AMETHYST STREET, SUBMITTED BY SUNRISE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASSISTED LIVING, LLC it is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DR 99-32, located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street, was approved by the Planning Commission on October 13, 1999, for a development of 88 beds and 59 suites, Senior Assisted Living, on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional District. The Developer, Sunrise Rancho Cucamonga Assisted Living LLC, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the of-site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $46,000 Labor and Material Bond: $23,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR 99-32 January 5, 1999 Page 2 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachments Vli;INi I '1' · ,ai CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,r. ...~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANGHO GUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DR 99-32 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed by Sunrise Rancho Cucamonga Assisted Living, LLC as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Base Line Road, east of Amethyst Street; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement' Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real properly referred to as DR 99-32. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION nO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DR 99-32 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and' Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the properly as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3~ STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. I AND Co BASE L/iVH HOAD A~ER ST, . . ~ ,r_7.~..i:~.~ .., CITY OF RAHCHO CUCAMONGA · ~ .'~ COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ..:; .!L',:i· STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L S1 Per plan S6 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: DR 99-32 NUMBER OF LAMPS 9500L 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Tuff Non-Tuff Trees S.F. S.F. Ea. Per plan Per plan Per plan Parcel Acres 2.6 * Existing items installed with original project. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Assessment Units By District S1 S6 L3B 2 1 I Annexation Date: January 5, 2000 Form Date 11/16/94 THE CITY ~ANCHO OF C[CAMONGA Memorandum DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: January 5, 2000 Jack Lam, AICP, ' Manager e er MODIFY CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D-7 - TRACT 15797 AND TRACT 15797-1 Requesting item D-7, Accepting Tract 15797 and Tract 15797-1 be modified to exclude Tract 15797-1, which will be scheduled for City Council at a later date. The landscaping has suffered extensive vandalism and is not ready for acceptance at this time. WJO:LB:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 5, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wlliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beck, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 15797, SUBMITTED BY TAVA DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA COMPANY DBA CITATION HOMES, LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF WOODRUFF PLACE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract Maps 15797, has been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds andaccept Maintenance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract Map 15797, located south of Highland Avenue, east of Woodruff Place, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds. Developer: Tava Development Co., a California Company dba Citation Homes 1960 Fairchild Road, Suite 270 Irvine, CA 92612 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond Respectfully submitted, City Engineer Tract15797 3SM914 491 00 $101,285.00 3SM914 491 00A $10,129.00 WJO:LRB:Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15797 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 15797, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino County. DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 5, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wlliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Enginee, r.~j~ ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS. RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BONDS, ACCEPT MAINTENANCE BONDS AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 15797 AND TRACT MAP 15797-1, SUBMITTED BY TAVA DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA COMPANY DBA CITATION HOMES. LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, EAST OF WOODRUFF PLACE RECOMMENDATION: The reqtfired improvements for Tract Maps 15797and 15797-1, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion for each tract and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds and accept Maintenance Bonds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract Map 15797 and Tract 15797-1, located south of Highland Avenue, east of Woodruff Place, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements bave been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bonds and accept the Maintenance Bonds. Developer: Tava Development Co., a California Company dba Citation Homes 1960 Fairchild Road, Suite 270 Irvine, CA 92612 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Bond Respectfully submitted, W~ City Engineer Tract 15797 3SM 914 491 00 $101,285.00 3SM 914 491 00A $10,129.00 Tract 15797-1 3SM 910 020 00 $949,825.00 3SM 940 020 00A $94,983.00 WJO:LRB:Is Attacllments RESOLUTION NO. i~) ~° 0~:~ 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 15797 AND 15797-1 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 15797 and 15797-1, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of CompIetion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. · 1~ANCIIO OF CUCAMONGA S fRepo DATE: TO: FROM: BY: January 5, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ACCEPT THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND SAFETY LIGHTING PROJECT LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-053 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $94,569.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Conncil accept the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Project located at the intersection of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, Contract No. 98-053, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and retain the Faithful Performance Bond to be used as the Maiutenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $91,000.00, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $9,456.90, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final contract amount of $94,569.00. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $94,569.00, which includes one contract change order in the amount of $3,569.00 for the relocation of the electrical service cabinet. The original amount approved by Connell was $100, I00.00. Respectfidly submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JTH/M DL: Is Attachments RESOLUTION NO. OO' ~(~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND ~AFETY LIGHTING PROJECT LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF ARROW ROUTE AND BAKER AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 98-053 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements the Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Project located at the intersection of Arrow Route and Baker Avenue, Contract No. 98-053, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of ~an Bernardino County. ORDINANCE NO. 618 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAAMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO. A. RECITALS. (i) The City Council has heretofore determined that the establishment of designated leash-optional areas for dogs within public parks will more fully serve the recreational needs of City residents owning dogs. (ii) The City Council has further determined that the establishment of leash-optional areas will provide a substantial benefit in the form of exercise and social interaction for dogs and their owners. (iii) The City Council has heretofore studied the most appropriate means by which to establish leash-optional areas within the City. In conjunction with one or more groups of local residents, the City Council has developed suitable parameters governing the establishment, operation and maintenance of leash-optional areas and one or more of said groups have indicated willingness to provide necessary funding therefor. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred, B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains and finds as follows: SECTION 1. In all respects as set fodh in the Recitals, Pad A, of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. Section 12.04.020 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 12.04.020 Exemptions. A. The provisions of subsection A. 1 of Section 12.04.010 of this chapter, requiring all dogs to be on-leash while in public parks within the City, and any similar requirement contained in the City's animal control regulations, shall not apply to the following: Ordinance No. 618 Page 2 1. Any dog used by a law enforcement agency. 2. Any dog while participating in a formal dog obedience training program, or any dog participating in a dog show or other program expressly permitted or sponsored by the City. 3. Any dog within a posted leash-optional area of any City-owned park, as established by resolution of the City Council provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve the owner or person having charge, custody, care and/or control of such dog from the responsibility to maintain proper control over the dog. Furthermore, nothing herein shall be construed as relieving such person from any liability for any damages arising out of his or her use of a leash-optional area. In order to be subject to the exemption set forth in this Subsection 3, all persons must comply with all requirements of law and the following rules and regulations when ,utilizing any leash- optional area: (a) No dog is permitted in a leash- optional area except when in the care, custody and control of a person at least thirteen (13) years old. Any person under thirteen (13) years of age must be accompanied by and be under the direct supervision of an adult. No person may have more than two dogs in a leash-optional area at any one time. All dogs must be under the voice control of their caretakers at all times. Dogs are permitted in a leash-optional area between dawn and dusk only. (b) All dogs must be at least four months of age, vaccinated for rabies, and currently licensed by the City's animal control authority. No dog that is sick, in heat, injured, under four (4) months of age, or which displays aggressive behavior toward other dogs' or humans is permitted in any leash- optional area. Food or treats for dogs may not be brought into any leash- optional area. Ordinance 618 Page 3 SECTION 3. (c) (d) (e) Any person having care, custody or control of a dog in a leash-optional area shall quiet or remove the dog if it barks and shall promptly remove and properly dispose of any waste deposited by such dog. No animals other than dogs are permitted in any leash-optional area. Dog obedience classes may not be conducted in a leash-optional area without a permit having first been obtained from the Community Services Department. The use of a leash-optional area shall constitute an agreement by any such dog owner or person having the care, custody or control of the dog, to strictly follow the rules in this Section 12.04.020A.3 and to assume all risks and to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City,-including its elected officials, officers and employees, with respect to any liabilities, claims, injuries or other damage to persons or property arising out of or connected with such person's use of the leash-optional area. B. The provisions of Subsections C, F and G of Section 12.04.010 shall not apply to City employees who are engaged in the performance of their duties. Section 12.04.050 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 12.04.050. Violation--Penalty. A. Any person engaging in any activity declared unlawful by subsections B, J and/or N of Section 12.04.010 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished as set forth in Section 1.12.020 of Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of this Code. Any person violating any other provision of this Chapter 12.04 including, but not limited to, violation of any rules applicable to use of leash-optional areas, shall be guilty of an infraction, punishable as set forth in Section 1.12.030 of Chapter 1.12 of Title I of this Code. Ordinance No. 618 Page 4 SECTION 4. Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. SECTION 5. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 1'~ day of December, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'I'I'EST: :,...~: Debra J, Adams, CMC, City Clerk j7 Ordinance 618 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17~h day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the Ist day of December, 1999. Executed this 2nd day of December, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk THE CItY OF ~ANCIIO CUCAMONCA Staff Report DATE: January 5, 2000 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Code regarding thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 99-05, through the adoption of the attached Ordinance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject application was initiated by the Planning Division to help clarify the use of terms defining thrift stores and other similar uses. Currently, there are no definitions in the Development Code to differentiate between these similar uses. Staff has worked diligently with the City Attorney to define terms that will be comprehensive as well as functional. The new definitions for thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops and pawn shops are explained in the attached staff report. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the subject application on December 8, 1999. No written or oral opposition to the Development Code Amendment was received. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT The amendment is exempt from the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3). CITYCOUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA 99-05 - CITY OF RC January5, 2000 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE · Thisitem hasbeenadvedisedasapublichearinginthelnlandValleyDailyBulletinnewspaper. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:EW:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report and Resolution No. 99-115 Exhibit "B" - Draft Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting dated December 8, 1999 Ordinance approving Development Code Amendment 99-05 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 8, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Code regarding thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-58 - MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE - A request to operate a thrift store in an existing lease space in the Sunrise Center shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial District located at 8673A Base Line Road, APN: 207-022-41. BACKGROUND: On October27, 1999, the Planning Commission considered Use Determination 99-04 to determine whether thrift stores fit within the definition of general retail in the Neighborhood Commercial District. The Commission felt that thrift stores were unique and were not general retail. The Commission directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Development Code adding definitions to distinguish thrift stores from second-hand stores. The Commission also directed staff to add thrift stores as a conditionally permitted use in the Development Code. In an effort to streamline the review process, a Conditional Use Permit is being concurrently processed with the proposed amendments. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT: Thrift stores do not appear as permitted or conditionally permitted uses in any of the commercial districts (Exhibit "D"). Antique shops are currently permitted in the General Commercial and Neighborhood Commercial Districts and second-hand stores and pawn shops are currently permitted in the General Commercial District per the Development Code. The nature of thrift store operations is unique enough to warrant a separate use type and use definition. Of particular concern to the Planning Commission were potential outdoor merchandising, how used merchandise would be dropped off/exchanged, and how the merchandise is displayed. The amendment would add thdft stores as a conditionally permitted use to allow the City to review a proposed operation to ensure that it will not impair other surrounding uses. The Commission was also concerned with outdoor collection. The Development Code requires that "all businesses shall be conducted completely within an enclosed building." Currently, the Development Code includes second-hand stores and pawn shops in the same use category. Staff believes that there is an important difference. A pawn broker provides a financial service by accepting merchandise as security for a loan; whereas, a second-hand store is a retailer of used goods. Antique stores are distinct from thrift stores, second-hand stores, and pawn shops by virtue of the type and age of merchandise sold. Antique stores offer goods from a different period, including furniture, art, jewelry, clothing, and collectibles. Therefore, it is suggested that definitions for each be established. The following are proposed definitions: PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 99-05 AND CUP 99-58 December 8, 1999 Page 2 Thrift Store - A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided: (1) all clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some organized fashion. as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles; (2) no merchandise shall be accepted on consignment; and (3) merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. Merchandise may be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Second-hand Store - A retail store or resaler offering used clothes, furniture, household appliances. and similar merchandise, provided; (1) clothes may be displayed in heaps or piles, as distinguished from racks or folded on shelves or tables; (2) merchandise may be accepted on sale for consignment; and (3) offers used materials or goods for sale that requires cleaning, repair, assembly or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. Merchandise may be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Antique Shod - A retail store offering antique clothes, jewelry. furniture, household appliances, printed materials, art, and similar merchandise, provided not more than 10 percent of the merchandise or 10 percent of the floor area is devoted to the sale of collectibles, new merchandise, or simu!ated antiques. "Antique" shall mean anything very old, or the like. made at a much earlier period than the present. generally more than 50 years ago, and which, because of age, rarity, or historical significance, has a monetary value greater than the original value. Pawn Shop - A pawnbroker or other shop engaged in the business of receiving tangible personal property, new or used, in pledge as security for a loan. Tangible personal property does not include coins. monetized bullion, or commercial ingots of precious metals. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: After direction from the Planning Commission, the Mennonite Central Committee applied for a Conditional Use Permit to lease 3,500 square feet in the Sunrise Center. The center is currently in a Neighborhood Commercial District, which does not allow thrift stores. A COnditional Use Permit is necessary, which requires approval of the Development Code Amendment. Compatible uses exist such as a paper supply store, hair salon, stamp store, fabric store and pet shop. The activities associated with the proposed thrift store should not cause conflict with any neighboring businesses. The Sunrise Center tenants include a paper supply company. fabric store, card shop, beauty salons, etc., which are compatible with the Mennonite Central Committee Thrift Store. Previous parking calculations show ample parking for the center. The required parking consists of 428 spaces. Sunrise Center has a total of 498 spaces, which was last calculated in 1994 (See Exhibit "A"). ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Development Code Amendment is exempt per Section 15061(b)(3), and the Conditional Use Permit application is exempt per Section 15303, of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DCA 99-05 AND CUP 99-58 December 8, 1999 Page 3 · RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of Development Code Amendment 99-05 to the City Council and approve Conditional Use Permit 99-58 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval. City Planner BB:EW\ma Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - List of Tenants within the complex Exhibit "C" - Applicant's Letter Exhibit "D" - Current Zoning Regulations Exhibit "E" - Proposed Amendment Resolution of Approval - Development Code Amendment 99-05 Resolution of Approval - Conditional Use Permit 99-58 I Address g6l 1-13-15 Bas~,line Road 8609 BasoHnc Road E607 Ba,~llne Road ~605 I)~.sellnc Road $605 ~ ~liue ~ad 860] B~]inc R~ad g~75 ~¢lin~ ~d '8673 A 8~eline Road ' ~673 B l]~li~ Road g671 Bueline Road 865 1 B~t/ne Road ~625 B~el~e RoM 76~ C~eli~ 'T' A/A JT L i Brandcns Diner l ~ Choice V/deo Cuea.'~anga 'Wl:eeLs M & W Caz~s R,'mcho Fee. xi Holm Car Wash Sunrize Liquoc Smar~ &Fir. al Swe~t Mercanlile Fh:za Royal Paul Calle's Walch Rep;dr B I,-.k~ Paper Co. Fcilf, e:s Panlla Hcu:,on Flocrs Sq Ft 4800 1600 1600 1600 1600 3200 ~a 1600 1560 12780 3500 3500 3600 100 I04~3 2000 1100 Exh, bit FOR WORLD , ECEIVED STAN LONG, CHAIRNIAN TEL (909) 982-96-~6 FAX (~09) 987-8994 October 15, 1999 City of Rancho Cucamonga To whom it may concern: OCT I 8 1999 City Ol Randno Cucamonc~ ~ qnino Division Conceming the Thrift Store using the facility at 8673A, Sunrize Center, Rancho Cucamonga I am Stm~ Long, Chairman of the Planning Committee for the Thrift Store. The Thrift Store is an extension of the Southem Califomia Festival and Sale, Incorporated. The Sale is held each May at the Pacific Christian Center in Upland. The function of the two activities is to raise money for World Hunger and Relief, through the Mennonite Central Committee whose main office is in Akron, PA and also an office in Reedly, CA. There are 50 Thrift Stores throughout United States and Canada (see enclosed insert). As owner of Long's Christian Bookstore, we can guarantee that the Thrift Store will be a First Class Store. A couple has been employed to serve as supervisors. There will be a good mix of product. Much of the clothing will have the original tags from the manufacturer. There will be new music tapes, small items of fumiture, gifts and plants. We feel strongly that the Thrift Store will be an asset to the Sunrize Center and to Rancho Cucamonga and will contribute revenue to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For more information, call Stan Long, (909)987-0406. Franchise number 33-0868761 \xC tl Board of Equalization # SR EH 97-604057 Stan Long, Chairman Thrift Store Planning Committee Mennonite Central Committee SPONSORED BY BRETHREN IN CHRIST AND MENNONITE CHURCHES PACIFIC CHRISTIAN CENTER 800 WEST ARROW HIGHWAY, UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 91786 CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CODE USE REGULATION SUMMARY Us6 Antique Shop Second-hand Stores and Pawn Shops Thrift Store Office Neighborhood General Professional Commercial Commercial Zone Zone Zone Permitted Permitted Permitted Not listed Not listed Not listed I I,.~ II /.-/7 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05 Section 17. 02. 140 - Definitions, should be amended to add the following land use definitions: Thrift Store - A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided: (1) all clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some organized fashion, as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles; (2) no merchandise shall be accepted on consignment; and (3) merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. Merchandise may be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Second-hand Store - A retail store or resaler offering ~sed clothes, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise, provided; (1) clothes may be displayed in heaps or piles, as distinguished from racks or folded on shelves or tables; (2) merchandise may be accepted on sale for consignment; and (3) offers used materials or goods for sale that requires cleaning, repair, assembly or refurbishmerit before it can be worn or put to normal use. Merchandise may be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Antique Shop - A retail store offering antique clothes, jewelry, furniture, household appliances, printed materials, art, and similar merchandise, provided not more than 10 percent of the merchandise or 10 percent of the floor area is devoted to the sale of collectibles, new merchandise, or simulated antiques. "Antique" shall mean anything very old, or the like, made at a much earlier pedod than the present, generally more than 50 years ago, and which, because of age, rarity, or historical significance, has a monetary value greater than the original value. Pawn Shop - A pawnbroker or other shop engaged in the business of receiving tangible personal property, new or used, in pledge as security for a loan. Tangible personal property does not include coins, monetized bullion, or commercial ingots of precious metals. Section 17.10.030- Use Regulations, Table 17.10,030 Use Regulations for Commercial/Office Districts, shouM be amended as follows: Use Office Professional Zone Antique Shop PawnShops Second-hand Store Thdfi Store Neighborhood General Commercial Zone Commercial Zone Permitted Permitted - CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP EXHIBIT "E" DRAFT EXCERPT FROM DECEMBER 8, 1999 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PUBLIC HEARINGS DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DCA 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development Code regarding thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-58 - MENNONITE CENTRAL COMMITTEE - A request to operate a thdft store in an existing lease space in the Sundse Center shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial Distdct, located at 8673A Base Line Road - APN: 207-022-41. Emily Wimer, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Stan Long, Chairman of Southern Califomia Festival and Sale, 795 North Laurel Avenue, Upland, expressed appreciation for the Commission's consideration. Headng no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public headng. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would like to see the thrift store definition expanded to show that it would carry mostly donated merchandise whereas most items in second-hand stores have been purchased for retail. Commissioner Mannerino agreed. Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attomey, suggested that the thrift store definition be changed to state that the majority of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated. Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to adopt the resolutions recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 99-05 with modification to revise the thdft store definition as stated above and approving Conditional Use Permit 99-58. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NONE NONE - carded Chairman McNiel stated he expects this store will be a model for futures stores. Planning Commission Minutes ~,-X,'~,',~ "S" -2- December 8, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05, REGARDING THRIFT STORES, SECOND-HAND STORES, ANTIQUE SHOPS, AND PAWN SHOPS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development Code Amendment 99-05, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereina~er in this Resolution, the subject Development Code Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of December, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occun'ed. B. Resolution. · NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on the 8th day of December, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impaCt on the environment; and c. The proposed amendment will clarity regulations for thrift stores, second-hand stores, antique shops, and pawn shops. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and b. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and c. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DCA 99-05 December 8, 1999 Page 2 and 99-115 d. The subject application is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; e. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environment Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, spedfically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and. therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission heroby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 99-05 as shown in Exhibit "E" of the staff report. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1999. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA · ~/j~l, Chairman I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of December 1999, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MANNERIN0, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE S/ ORD,NANCE NO. I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05, AMENDING SECTION 17.02.140 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING DEFINITIONS FOR THRIFT STORES, SECOND-HAND STORES, ANTIQUE SHOPS, AND PAWN SHOPS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals.. 1. On December 8, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-115, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On January 5, 2000, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set fodh in the Recitals, Par~ A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," and summarized below: Section 17.02.140 - The addition of four definitions pertaining to Thrift Stores, Second-Hand Stores, Antique Shops and Pawn Shops. SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 99-05 - CITY OF R.C. January 5, 2000 Page 2 SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause · the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-05 Section 17. 02. 140 - Definitions, shouM be amended to add the following land use definitions: Thrift Store - A retail store offering used clothing, furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise which is in good repair, provided: (1) all clothes are displayed on racks, folded on shelves or tables, or in some organized fashion, as distinguished from being displayed in heaps or piles; (2) no merchandise shall be accepted on consignment; and (3) merchandise requires no cleaning, repair, assembly, or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. The majority of merchandise offered for sale shall be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Second-hand Store - A retail store or resaler offering used clothes. furniture, household appliances, and similar merchandise, provided; (1) clothes may be displayed in heaps or piles, as distinguished from racks or folded on shelves or tables; (2) merchandise may be accepted on sale for consignment; and (3) offers used materials or goods for sale that requires cleaning, repair, assembly or refurbishment before it can be worn or put to normal use. Merchandise may be donated; however, all collection and storage shall be conducted inside the building. Antique Shop - A retail store offering antique clothes, jewelry. furniture, household appliances. printed materials, art, and similar merchandise, provided not more than 10 percent of the merchandise or 10 percent of the floor area is devoted to the sale of collectibles, new merchandise, or simulated antiques. "Antique" shall mean anything very old, or the like, made at a much earlier period than the present, generally more than 50 years ago, and which, because of age, rarity, or historical significance, has a monetary value greater than the original value. Pawn Shop - A pawnbroker or other shop engaged in the business of receiving tangible personal property, new or used, in pledge as security for a loan. Tangible personal property does not include coins, monetized bullion, or commercial ingots of precious metals. Section 17.10.030 - Use Regulations, Table 17.10.030 Use Regulations for Conmtercial/Office Districts, shouM be amended as follows.' Use Office professional Zone Antique Shop Pawn Shops Second-hand Store 'Thrift Store Neighborhood General Commercial Zone Commercial Zone Permitted Permitted CUP CUP CUP CUP CUP EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Special Meeting December 28, 1999 DRAFT- FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Chairman McNiel called the Special Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Council Chamber at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman McNiel then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Larry McNiel, Pare Stewart, ABSENT: Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner;, Dan James. Senior Civil Engineer; Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Macias, carded 4-0-1 (Tolstoy absent), to approve the minutes of December 8, 1999. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias, carded 4-0-1 (Tolstoy absent), to approve the minutes of the Adjourned Meeting of December 8, 1999. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS A. CONSIDERATION OF 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated he had spoken with Chades Buquet, a representative of a property owner who raised the issue and Mr. Buquet indicated he had intended to attend the meeting this evening but was stuck in traffic on his way back from vacation. He said that Mr. Buquet concurred with the Public Works Subcommittee recommendation. Mr. Bullet presented the staff report and recommended adoption of the subcommittee's recommendation. He also repoded he had spoken with Commissioner Tolstoy on Monday. He indicated Mr. Tolstoy asked that his comments be forwarded to the Commission because he would be unable to attend the meeting and that he concurred with the Subcommittee recommendation but was concerned that the City not obligate itself to pay for maintenance costs in the future. Commissioner Stewart asked how the Subcommittee ardved at the $1.00 per square foot recommendation. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated the amount was based on discussions with Caltrans regarding installation of large scale landscaping. He said that Caltrans uses less than $1.00 square foot for installation but that cost does not cover design cost or long term maintenance. Chairman McNiel noted that the Subcommittee recommended that City Council appropdate funds to complete a master plan design. He asked if Caltrans has a master plan design and asked why the City would have to develop a master plan if Caltrans already has one. Commissioner Macias did not feel that Caltrans has a master plan for each freeway. Mr. Bullet felt it would be more appropriate to state that Caltrans has standards rather than a master plan. Commissioner Macias asked the difference between the City's doing a master plan and using Caltrans standards. Mr. Buller replied that the intent would be similar to what was being done along the Foothill Freeway. He said that master plan complies with Caltrans direction but has some signature features including special elements such as rockscape or palm trees. Commissioner Macias asked if, under the master plan, the fixed fee would be the same even if a property is located in an area that calls for special landscaping. He asked who would be responsible for maintenance. Mr. Buller said that if the master plan is not in keeping with Caltrans guidelines, the City would be responsible for the maintenance costs. Commissioner Mannedno asked if the landscaping is beyond Caltrans standards, if Caltrans would take over the maintenance costs in 20 years or if it the excess costs would fall on the City. Mr. Bullet did not believe Caltraos would take on any additional costs for landscaping. He said the master plan they are working on for the Foothill Freeway stays within the Caltrans maintenance costs. Commissioner Mannedno asked why it would be necessary to adopt a master plan that follows the Caltrans guidelines. Mr. Buller replied that Caltrans may indicate 50 different types of trees that fall within their guidelines, but a master plan would select the types of trees and groundcover to be used. He said Caltrans standards may also call for regimented planting whereas the master plan may call for random planting. Commissioner Mannedno stated that the master plan would then call out the species to be used and the planting details. PC Special Meeting Minutes -2- December 28, 1999 Chairman McNiel asked if the $1.00 per square foot would be assessed after the master plan is adopted to try to cover costs of other areas where no fees were collected. Mr. Buller stated it would not and asked Mr. James if the exhibit depicted where existing developments were not assessed the fees because they were constructed prior to adoption of the fees. Mr. James said it did not. Chairman McNiel asked the approximate master plan design cost. Mr. James responded that the master plan for Day Creek Boulevard cost $35,000. Chairman McNiel noted that the freeway corridor is considerably larger. Commissioner Mannerino asked who would be on the Master Plan committee. Mr. Buller reported that for the Foothill freeway, the Joint Power Authority and the task force has been working with staff and all the other cities along the corddot. He thought some of the same principles would be used on the 1-15 freeway corridor as well. Commissioner Macias asked the net impact of adopting the three Subcommittee recommendations. He felt it is a good thing to develop the master plan but said the final recommendation is essentially a reduction of the fee from $2.00 per square foot to $1.00 per square foot. Mr. Buller replied that the cost would be reduced by $1.00 per square foot and the City would cover the cost of preparing the master plan. Commissioner Macias noted that any applications processed prior to the master plan adoption would have reduced fees. Chairman McNiel noted that the Subcommittee minutes referred to conditions as they exist today. He thought the existing conditions are based on Caltrans standards. He asked the City's chances for obtaining grant money. Mr. Buller responded that the federal government has recently provided additional grant money but the competition is fierce. Commissioner Macias asked about maintenance. Mr. Buller replied that Caltrans may not have the money to install rockscape but the maintenance costs on rockscape are lower than on other types of landscaping. Chairman McNiel felt the recommendations were a lose-lose proposition for the City and said he was not comfortable with the Subcommittee recommendations. He felt the City would be missing an opportunity by reducing the fee but he was also worded there may be an economic downturn and the City would be stuck with higher costs. Motion: Moved by Mannerino to support the Public Works Subcommittee recommendations. He said he was placing his motion on the floor to encourage debate. Chairman McNiel questioned how many projects would be lost if the first two recommendations were adopted but the fee remained at $2.00 square foot. PC Special Meeting Minutes -3- December 28, 1999 Commissioner Macias agreed with chairman McNiel. He questioned if there was an onslaught of development being lost because of the high fee. Commissioner Mannedno did not feel that $2.00 versus $1.00 per square foot would be a deal killer. He expressed concern that more elaborate landscap!ng would be installed and that the City would be responsible for maintenance in the future. Chairman McNiel felt that the $2.00 assessment would pay for part of the maintenance costs. He agreed with the goal of completing the master plan design but he preferred that the $2.00 fee be retained. Commissioner Macias felt that $1.00 or even the $2.00 per square foot would not pay the actual cost for the landscaping. He said he would like to make a motion. Commissioner Mannedno withdrew his motion. Motion: Moved by Macias, seconded by Stewart, to support the first two recommendations of the Public Works Subcommittee but to retain the $2.00 per square foot fee until completion of the master plan. The Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY - carded PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Mannedno, seconded by Stewart, to adjourn. adjourned at 7:36 p.m. The Planning Commission Respectfully submitted, Brad Bullet Secretary PC Special Meeting Minutes -4- December 28, 1999 DATE: Janua~J 5, 2000 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Brad Bulleft City planner Laura J. Bonaccorsi, Associate Park planner CONSIDERATION OF 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, AND AppROVAL TO USE BEAUTIRCATION FUNDS FOR FREEWAY LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council review the attached Planning Commission report and public Works Subcommittee minutes pertaining to the 1-15 freeway landscaping. and approve the proposed freeway landscape recommendations, which include the development of a freeway landscape master plan with Beautification funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Concerns with the current policy regarding landscaping of the 1-15 landscape corridor prompted staff to reexamine the policy established by the planning Commission in 1987. The attached planning Commission report and public Works Subcommittee minutes outline the concerns and provide a revised strategy to accomplish the freeway landscaping in today's economy. Essentially. the costs of associated with installing and maintaining upgraded landscaping are prohibitive for developers, the City and Caltrans alike. Since landscaping is still desired, a master plan reflecting areas of more basic (Caltrans standards) landscaping with enhanced landscape treatment only at major streets is suggested. This approach will enable the City to lessen the in-lieu fees it is currently collecting from freeway- adjacent developers. The Planning Commission reviewed this item on December 28, 1999. They concurred with the first two recommendations of the public Works Subcommittee but expressed concern with reducing the assessment and recommended the current $2.00 per square foot assessment be maintained. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - December 20, 1999, Public Works Subcommittee Minutes Exhibit "B" - December22, 1999, planning Commission Staff Report December 20, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Works subcommittee was held on Monday, December 20, 1999, in the Tapia Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:37 p.m. Present were Subcommittee members: Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams and Council Member Paul Biane. Also present were: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, William J. O'Neil, City Engineer, Laura Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner, Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, Rufus Barkley B. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION B1. MINUTES: October 6, 1999 The Subcommittee approved the minutes of October 6, 1999. B2. CONSIDERATION OF 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS The City Engineer gave the presentation referring to the staff report dated December 20, 1999, regarding the City's Planning Commission policy on freeway landscaping for the 1-15 Freeway. The Subcommittee in reviewing the staff report noted the policy as approved by the Planning Commission was an excellent one in light of the time it was adopted in 1987. At this time there were considerable dollars available for landscaping projects as well as maintenance. The passage of Proposition 218 has changed the City's perspective on landscaping projects. The Subcommittee noted any landscape treatment other than that meeting Caltran's standards would require a 20-year maintenance period. The cost of this maintenance period is exorbitant and would be a definite hindrance in development of property adjacent to the freeway. In addition, the City would not be able to afford the cost of landscape maintenance which would be substantial. In lieu of the realities of today's marketplace, the Subcommittee notes the most important element lacking are regarding this issue is that of a master plan design. The Subcommittee recommends: ~-?q,41t /7' '~ " · Public Works Subcommittee Minutes December 20, 1999 Page 2 · The City Council appropriate, as early as possible, funds to complete a master plan design for the 1-15 Corridor in accordance with Caltrans' basic landscape design concepts. · Once the master plan has been prepared all new development adjacent to the freeway will be conditioned to install the landscaping as approved in the master plan. · · Development occurring prior to completion of the master plan shall pay a $1.00 a square foot of landscaped area towards the design, overhead and installation of landscape as determined by the master plan. The Sub-Committee notes that the recommended landscaping will meet the basic Caltrans' standards and will provide a scenic corridor along the 1-15 Freeway. The Sub-Committee also noted in the design master plan special treatment should be applied at specific nodes, for example: Foothill Boulevard and I-15. It will be the requirement of development adjacent to these nodes to install an upgraded landscaping and pay for future maintenance costs. In addition, the Sub-Committee instructed staff to be aggressive and work with Callxans towards obtaining grants that will enhance this corridor. It is hoped partnerships between the City and Caltrans and where possible the development community can provide an aesthetic treatment along the 1-15 Corridor which will surely be better than the conditions as they are today. The Sub-Committee requested the Planning Commission revise their policy in accordance with the Sub-Committees recommendation, and this policy be forwarded to the City Council for full City Council approval. There will be no more issues to come before the Sub-Committee. None. C. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. D. COMMUNICATION FROM THE PUBLIC Public Works Subconunittee Minutes December 20, 1999 Page 3 E. ADJOURNMENT The Public Works Subcommittee meeting adjourned at 5:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: William J. O'Neil City Engineer THE CiTY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA Stuff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 22, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Laura J. Bonaccorsi, Associate Park Planner CONSIDERATION OF I-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to identify issues and concerns with the current policy requiring freeway landscaping along the I-15 corridor. BACKGROUND: GENERAL: In 1987 the Planning Commission passed a resolution (attached) establishing a policy requiring all development adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway to either landscape and irdgate freeway right-of-way adjoining their site, or pay an in-lieu fee. The policy was implemented to ensure that landscaping along the corridor would surpass Caltrans' basic level of landscaping for erosion control only and be consistent with the substantial upscale landscaping required throughout the rest of the City. Ideally, the intent was to establish a freeway landscape perimeter to screen objectionable views, mitigate noise, and in general provide an attractive buffer/edge. ISSUES: The City currently does not have a freeway landscape master plan. To avoid inconsistent designs and/or piecemeal installations by development, the City is collecting an in- lieu fee of $2.00 /sf for the freeway landscaping. The development community has expressed frustration with the resolution requirements and has requested that the fee be eliminated. Tied to the collection of these funds is the City's statutory obligation to expend them in a reasonable time frame (SB 1693). Caltrans will only accept upgraded landscaping for maintenance after the installing party has maintained it for 20 years. The development community views this as an unreasonable burden on top of the cost for the upgraded landscaping. Upgraded landscaping installed by the City with in-lieu fees would also be subject to this requirement. Additionally, the City would also have to take over maintenance of any areas abandoned by development for the remainder of the maintenance pedod. As they currently exist, the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) would have difficulty absorbing the additional cost for any freeway maintenance. /d /T PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITI'EE STAFF REPORT 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS December 22, 1999 Page 2 ANALYSIS: CALTRANS LANDSCAPING: If Caltrans were to landscape the freeway (although no funds are budgeted for the near future), they would be compelled to provide landscaping based upon the maximum funding allocated by the state. The amount of $.62/sf, provides for basic landscape installation and one year of maintenance, and $.78/sf provides for three years of maintenance. The state figures would also typically be applied to larger scale projects, (12 acres and over) where an economy of scale could be realized. According to the Caltrans Distdct 8 Landscape Architecture Design Section, the majority of this cost goes to irrigation, with the planting limited to one gallon or smaller size materials. None of the cost covers Caltrans project design, construction administration or overhead. The development community has argued that they would like to use these figures for their estimates and designs, as Caltrans would immediately accept maintenance of facilities designed within their financial parameters. LANDSCAPING INSTALLED BY PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT: In cempadson, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is a community known for its high design standards. Both City and development projects alike are required to provide larger size plant materials and sometimes accent rockwork or art. When applied to the freeway right-of-way, these design elements carry a higher price tag and the 20-year maintenance period. The landscaping at the Jurupa exit in Ontario is a good example of this. Caltrans has stated that special maintenance elements, such as art, decorative fencing, or palm trees, would not be accepted by Caltrans in the future, and thus permanent maintenance of such amenities would need to be addressed. Only one project, Auto Nation, has installed a Caltrans landscape along 1-15, at the Fourth Street on/off ramp. This area was isolated from the main portion the freeway right--of-way and adjacent to a City gateway monument. The developer was required to install landscaping instead of paying the in-lieu fee THE IN-LIEU FEE: In the absence of any freeway design concept and specific project, the City has been collecting an in-lieu of construction fee for the landscaping. While this relieves developers of the landscape design, installation and subsequent 20 years of maintenance, it burdens both the City and developer with requiring a minimum fee of $2.00/sf.* to provide: 1. Master plan 2. Construction plans, specifications and cost estimates 3. Construction administration *The $2.00 per square foot was considered a low to medium estimate for installation alone, based upon input from three major landscape architectural firms and City capital project bids. The current fee for freeway landscaping may actually fall short of what will be needed to construct the ultimate design. Since the resolution was passed in 1987, in-lieu fees have been collected from five projects and several others are in varying stages of processing (project/location map attached). PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF REPORT 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS December 22, 1999 Page 3 SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATION: The City needs to decide if freeway landscaping is still desired. If so, then the City needs to decide if should help facilitate the landscaping, and how much money could be applied towards design, installation, and maintenance. The amount of funding will then determine who is installing the landscaping and maintaining it. The City's options, from least expensive to most expensive, are as follows: A. Work with Caltrans budqetina to have landscaDincl proarammed for our area Given the ramifications of Proposition 218, the City may wish to rethink absorbing any freeway maintenance if Caltrans would consider budgeting landscaping of the 1-15 corridor. The results would be modest, "basic Caltrans landscaping", uniformly applied on a large scale, with all maintenance performed by Caltrans. Developer in-lieu fees would not be required. A variation of this concept would be to rely on Caltrans and development for the majority of modest "basic Caltrans landscaping" to be installed, but utilize available grants for the design and construction to enhance specific highly visible area at interchanges. However, ongoing maintenance costs may fall upon the City to cover upgraded improvements. Have the developers install landscapinq as projects come in. This would produce patchwork installations of upgraded landscaping, and may require infill installation of landscaping by either the City or Caitrans to be visually cohesive and effective. The development community would incur increased installatioNmaintenance costs of the upgraded landscaping, along with a long-term maintenance agreement. The City would likely have increased maintenance costs as developments occasionally default. C. Have the City install landscapinG. This would continue City collection of fees and absorption of design, construction, administrative costs and 20 years of maintenance. The fees would be ddven by a current cost estimate based upon an approved master plan. Construction would have to cover broad areas to be visually effective, and so the project(s) would require substantial capital outlay by the City, since few development projects will have paid fees. Altemative funding sources such as grants would need to be targeted and secured. The use of City funds would likely pre--empt or impact other City projects. Freeway maintenance would have to be provided through LMDs. The legal issues of determining the benefit dedved from the landscaping - local/special benefit vs. regional/general benefit would be a political nightmare. Proposition 218 would tdgger elections if the districts adjacent to the freeway were asked to absorb the substantial extensive landscaping. To distdbute the costs City-wide might require a new distdct or elections across the board in all existing districts. The City's legal counsel would have to study the issues and provide additional information, but the end result will be higher taxes, if the City was successful in getting resident approval. The results of City-installed landscaping would be an upgraded freeway landscape, uniformly applied on a large scale. The political and financial ramifications however, make this the most difficult method to accomplish freeway landscaping. PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMrI'rEE STAFF REPORT 1-15 FREEWAY LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS December 22, 1999 Page 4 Should it be determined that City-facilitated landscaping is desired, staff recommends that a consultant be used to develop a freeway beautification master plan, perhaps funded with Beautification Funds. If the City chooses not to pursue landscaping any longer, then the Planning Commission would need to take appropriate action to rescind the resolution and refund the collected fees. Respectfully submitted, WJO:LB Enclosures RESOLUTION NO. 87-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF TIlE CITY OF RANCHO CUC/V4ONGA ESTABLISIIING A POLICY REQUIRING LANDSCAPING OF FREEWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY. WHEREAS, the planning Conmission finds it desirable to landscape time 1-15 (Devore) Freeway right-of-way because of its significance as a regional transportation corridor through the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds this resolution necessary to give property owners and developers notice of this policy. NOW, TIIEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that tile planning Commission of tile City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby declare their policy to be: 1. lhat all new development adjacent to the 1-15 (Devore) Freeway shall be required to landscape and irrigate the freeway right-of-way adjoining their development site. 2. That the landscaping and irrigation shall be in conformance with Caltrans Master Planting Plan through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3. That the new development and tile landscaped portion of time 1-15 Freeway shall be annexed to an existing Landscape Maintenance District or a new Landscape Maintenance District shal]- be fon, ed affecting the same properties. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TNIS 14thDAY OF October , 1987. Larry~./x~c , Chal m ~ ATTEST: I,' Bra arming Co~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Co~lmHssion held on the l~th day of OCTOBER , 1987, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CHITlEA, BLAKESLEY, EMERICK, MCIIIEL NOES: CO~ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE MAP KEY ~ PROJECT NUMBER d:) DR 88-07 (~) DR 87-55 (~) DR 88-32 (~) CUP 88-37 (~) DR 97-02 (~) TR 15911 (~) TR 15912 ~) 'Fr 15711 (~) CUP 99-55 {~) CUP 97.42 ~) DR 99-70 ~) CUP 99-35 (~ PM 15012 IAMOUNT COLLECTED $6,700.69 $69,654.00 $12,294.10 $12,608.05 $34,911.52 ] In conditioning process (3 projects) Condltioned to provide landscape or pay In-lieu fee (4 pfojeds) Fees collected (5 projects) ] Freeway landscape installed (1 project) STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES P.O. BOX 419047 RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA 95741-9047 (916) 262-1816 FAX: 262-2837 GRAY DAVIS, Governor December 21, 1999 (916) 262-1706 Kenneth A. Miller Flood Control Engineer County of San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Department 825 East Third Street San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 Re: Inundation Man - Deer Creek Debris Basin DearMr. Miller: I am writing with regard to correspondence you recently sent addressed to Malissa McKeith, of Loeb and Loeb LLP, and copied to the Office of Emergency Services, concerning preparation of the referenced dam inundation map. In that letter you projected a time frame for completion of the map of between six and eight months. Government Code section 8589.5 became effective in 1973, and has since that time required the preparation of inundation maps as defined in that section. The San Bernardino Transportation/Flood Control Department was reminded by letter ~'om this office in March of 1999 of the necessity of complying with the cited Govemment Code provision. The maps required under California law are essential for the protection of the public safety and are used in designing emergency procedures for evacuation and control of populated areas located below dams subject to the foregoing requirement. They are also used to produce the Natural Hazard Disclosure Statements which inform potential property purchasers of inundation risks. For these reasons it is critical that a map be prepared in as short of time as possible. The Office of Emergency Services is unable to accept the time line the Department has proposed for completion of the maps. We are cognizant of constraints affecting public agencies regarding the letting of contracts, but none the less believe the Department should be able to accomplish the task by March 1, 1999. We therefore are insisting that you develop a work completion schedule which would allow submission of the map to this office by that date, and further, that you provide us a copy of such schedule no later than January 7, 2000. Kenneth A. Miller December 20. 1999 Page 2. If you have any questions, or wish to discuss this matter further, please feel flee to telephone me at the above number. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Sincerely, Bob McKechnie Staff Counsel cc: Charles S. Scolastico, Esq. San Bemardino County Counsel Malissa Hathaway McKeith, Esq. Loeb & Loeb LLP Deborah Steffans Regional Administrator, OES Southern Region