Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/09/16 - Agenda Packet DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 16, 1997 7:00 P.M. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members: Bill Bethel Rich Macias Dan Coleman Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Larry McNiel PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. 7:00 p.m. (Miki) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-32 MODIFICATION 1 - AUTO NATION - A request to modify an approved automotive sales business, reducing the floor area by approximately 8,000 square feet,reducing the outdoor display area, and reserving a 3.796 acre area for future expansion on a 20-acre site located north of Fourth Street between the I-15 on/off ramp and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park Area (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229-263-19,20,21 and a portion of 18. 7:40 p.m. (Steve) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-10 - CENTEX HOMES - The review of proposed modifications to the private equestrian center in conjunction with an approved development review application for the development of 92 lots within approved Tentative Tract 12659, which consists of 134 lots on 67.67 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest comer of Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues - APN: 225-331-05. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting. 8:10 P.M. (Brent) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TMP HOMES - A request to eliminate decorative brick entry portals for a previously approved tract and design review for 42 single family homes within Tract 13566 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located south of Wilson Avenue and west of the I-15 Freeway -APN: 226-311-27 and 226-321-01. 8:25 p.m. (Tom) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-19 - CA4T1i i O COMPANY INC - The development of a commercial shopping center consisting of a 65,155 square foot grocery/drug store,two satellite buildings totaling 6,000 square feet and 6,200 square feet, and two drive-thru pads totaling 3,500 square feet and 2,500 square feet on 9.82 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-03, 05, 08, 15, 20, 21, and 49. DRC AGENDA September 16, 1997 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. ADJOURNMENT I, Mary Lou Gragg, Office Specialist H for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 4, 1997, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Miki Bratt September 16, 1997 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-32 MODIFICATION 1- AUTO NATION - A request to modify an approved automotive sales business,reducing the floor area by approximately 8,000 square feet, reducing the outdoor display area, and reserving a 3.796 acre area for future expansion on a 20-acre site located north of Fourth Street between the I-15 on/off ramp and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park Area (Subarea 12) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229-263-19,20,21 and a portion of 18. Background: The use and project site are the same as that approved for Conditional Use Permit 96-32. All Conditions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit 96-32 remain in effect unless specifically modified by this application. (See attached approved Building Elevation and Landscape Plan). Design Parameters: The primary building footprint remains the same but has been moved closer to the I-15 Freeway. The location of the service buildings have also been adjusted. The service building has been rotated so that the length parallels the vacant parcel to the north. Therefore, the 6-foot high solid block security wall partially screens the service building which is 20-foot high. All building floor areas have been reduced slightly. A one-story building is proposed for the primary building and retains the articulation of the planes of the approved building. However, the central round screen element has been removed and parapet height increased, which results in a flat roof line with somewhat decreased screen function. The proposed landscape palette has less variety than the approved plan. The northeast comer of the site will be landscaped with ground cover but reserved for future expansion of the facility. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: I. To the showroom elevation, add design interest to roof height, for example: retain circular central screen element or add parapet height articulation. 2. Per Conditions of Approval,to the service and wash building elevations, add design elements to add interest to long blank walls, for example: scoring bands at top of panels which repeat the scoring elements for the drive-thru end. Also, add color variation to panels, for example: brown or green to each blank panels on the left of each doorway. 3. Per the Conditions of Approval, establish a visual corridor from Fourth Street to the showroom building. At the Fourth Street visual entry provide a low plant palette, plant color interest, and decorative rock hardscape. Between Fourth Street and the showroom building incorporate a reduced version of the approved decorative display area (herringbone paving and landscape in interesting shapes). Add accent ground cover (annual color and perennial color) to planter areas along the visual corridor. DRC COMMENTS CUP 96-32 - MODIFICATION 1 - AUTO NATION September 16, 1997 Page 2 4. The amount of trees along Fourth Street is proposed to be substantially reduced from original approval. Per the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan,retain color accent trees(Prunus C. Krauter and Crepe Myrtle),rock hardscape along Fourth Street,and Canary Island pines as background trees per Fourth Street landscaping guidelines. Landscaping for the street frontage and landscape setback area along Fourth Street landscaping must make a major statement about the City as well as about Auto Nation. 5. On the Site Plan and Conceptual Landscape Plan, carry the landscape buffer on both sides of the entry drive to the intersection of the display drive and guest parking drive. No parking spaces shall back into the entry drive between the entry and the showroom building. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Along the north property line, the 5-foot landscape screening buffer is not wide enough to accommodate the branch width of canary island pines, either change to a more upright tree species or widen the landscape buffer. 2. At the southeast comer of the site, end perimeter fencing at the north corner of the City entry monument area. 3. For the northeast display parking area, provide additional trees to add visual interest. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Per the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan,provide decorative paving for all pedestrian crossings in display, guest, and employee parking areas. Painted, stripped crossings are not acceptable. 2. Along the north property line extending east of the solid wall,provide adequate screening: between trees plant shrubs(5-gallon size planted 3 feet on center and appropriate ground cover) which will form an attractive border and a dense screen hedge. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this project subject to revised plans prior to Planning Commission. Attachments: Approved Landscape Plan Approved Elevations Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Miki Bratt The applicant will address design concerns and return to the Design Review Committee with revisions: 1. Provide articulation to the roof elevation for sales building. DRC COMMENTS CUP 96-32 - MODIFICATION 1 - AUTO NATION September 16, 1997 Page 3 2. Add design elements to create visual interest for service and wash buildings. 3. Enhance the visual corridor between Fourth Street and service buildings with a combination of expanded display area, decorative paving, and additional landscaping. 4. Enhance the Fourth Street streetscape and landscape setback area. 5. Widen planter area or provide appropriate tree species for north property line. The applicant has agreed to address all other issues and incorporate changes into plans if possible by the next Design Review meeting, but no later that the Planning Commission meeting: uojjeNojnv �U2 -- NVO ,\, ;o�A� • Q.aG\\�,.\\`.S\r:,y'�.`a\�34�.�\:\L\ \+A\\a�aAZ. � 1�? \ .�.:;: d31 t�► I:r 3,711� �� S:Al ` �\a•. w �pfz '1' 1,1 11 to 1;1 ���;% \:!fir'•- 'ilF C�.` aL;�a ;,i� 1'11 1� 1\1 ea 1• ��� ...,; €� (,��1t1U• e 1>I t`v1 It•1 11 \ r> \t\i �,: L.li Q1 1':1€ Qa 1�1 Q`�f � •I F. `cSc.T: •: t�l� 11 11 Ea 111 �% �� 1>I 11 ICI 1,1 1 � .=4' •'�*' �:5,: �':�::; .>� 1 ►, €��► 1:11 ea �. �� '� \ „ t .�11 10 Q4 ZN"n Mtn ■ :� .1'1.. 1 \1 n li 1t• ANY °\ e4 P 'h yo YMDW= Dim _U104 337is 3w 3'"v owj:m NO s --M11 U'183IX73 WVA3 L wo 2 ; 14 U M }}\, : �\\\/� `� % �\\�� � � \ � _ � � �} \ \ � \ ' � \\\{ : . � � � 0 i e > »: >\:« . a» 0- tl P P -.i 1 � 1A 0- 0. 0. oz X a 71 0- 0. ?.11-02 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Steve Hayes September 16, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-10-CENTEX HOMES-The review of proposed modifications to the private equestrian center in conjunction with an approved development review application for the development of 92 lots within approved Tentative Tract 12659, which consists of 134 lots on 67.67 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues - APN: 225-331-05. Design Parameters: The equestrian center(Lot"A")is centrally located within the Etiwanda Estates subdivision,which was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985. Phase One of the project was constructed by the previous owner. This phase included 31 homes in the southeast portion of the subdivision (south and east of the equestrian area), related street and trail improvements, as well as Phase One of the equestrian center. Existing in the equestrian area are 18 horse stalls, the main arena, the asphalt vehicular loop and a proportionate amount of all necessary related equestrian amenities. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The purpose of this review is for the Design Review Committee to consider the proposed modifications to the private equestrian area within the Etiwanda Estates community as shown on the attached Conceptual Plans. A condition of approval from the Development Review application, which was approved by the Planning Commission on July 9, 1997,required that any modifications to the approved equestrian area plans would require review of the Trails Advisory Committee and Design Review Committee. The Trails Advisory Committee recommended approval of the proposed modifications to the equestrian area at their meeting on September 4, 1997. The primary proposed modification to the equestrian area plans is the reduction in the number of tack and hay storage rooms in exchange for a wider variety of outdoor amenities such as barbeque facilities,picnic tables and horseshoe pits in the southern portions of the lot. A detailed background of the project, analysis of the modifications and all previous actions relating to the development of the equestrian area can be found in the attached action comments from the September 4, 1997 Trails Advisory Committee meeting. Staff Recommendation: The Trails Advisory Committee recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the proposed modifications to the equestrian area Conceptual Plans as proposed, with the detailed Construction Plans, catalog cuts of amenities, etc., to be submitted for review and approval of the Planning Division prior to installation. Attachments: Conceptual Plans Trails Advisory Committee Action Agenda dated September 4, 1997 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET September 4, 1997 II. NEW BUSINESS A. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-10 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 12659 - PHASES 2 THROUGH 51 - CENTEX HOMES -The review of proposed revisions to the community equestrian facility located internally within the Etiwanda Estates community, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Wilson Avenues. Background: Tentative Tract 12659 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985. The subdivision was designed using the Optional Development Standards within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Optional Standards essentially allow for smaller individual lots and development at the higher end of each prescribed density range in trade for larger amounts of common open space. Approval included the subdivision of the 67-acre site into 132 residential lots and 3 lettered, common open space lots. The largest common open space area was designated for equestrian use for the subdivision and, therefore, eliminated the need for keeping horses on individual lots. The Trails Advisory Committee originally reviewed the conceptual plans for the equestrian area (Lot "A") on September 5, 1985, and recommended approval to the Planning Commission with conditions as shown in the attached Exhibit "D." These conditions were then incorporated into the adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 85-168. After a period of several years"specific development plans for Lot "A" were reviewed by the Trails Advisory and Design Review Committees, per the adopted Conditions of Approval. Action Comments from the various meetings of the Trails Advisory and Design Review Committees have been attached for your convenience (See Exhibit "D"). A portion of the equestrian area was then constructed by the previous owner with Phase One of the subdivision, which included approximately 30 homes. Approximately one-third of the required horse stalls and tack rooms and the center arena oval were completed by the previous developer in conjunction with Phase One of the subdivision. Analysis: The primary difference between the approved construction plans and the current developers (Centex Homes) proposal is the reduction in the number of horse stalls and tack rooms at the west and east ends of the equestrian area. The originally approved plans showed 54 horse stalls and 10 hay storage rooms at build out of the equestrian area for the 132-lot subdivision. The developer claims that the number of horse stalls and tack rooms as shown on the approved plans will not be necessary based on the current use and occupancy of the existing stalls constructed with Phase One by the previous developer. The developer intends to build two additional horse stall/tack room buildings as needed with the remaining phases of development, bringing the total number of horse stalls to 33 and hay storage rooms to 6 at build out. In place of the 4 horse stall/hay storage buildings that have been deleted from the site plan are TAC COMMENTS DR 97-10 - CENTEX September 4, 1997 Page 2 a large turf area and horseshoe pits at the southwest corner of site area and a turf area, picnic, and barbeque facilities near the southeast corner of the area. These recreation amenities were requested by the homeowners. The plans that have been forwarded to the Committee have been reviewed and approved in concept by a majority of the landowners in the subdivision and the Etiwanda Estates Homeowners Association. With 31 homes and 18 horse stalls completed with the original phase of the subdivision, only 4 of the stalls are occupied at this time. When applying the current house to occupied horse stall ratio to the completed project, only 17 horse stalls would be needed for the entire project. Staff feels that the number of stalls could be reduced based on the research performed by the current developer and that the proposed added amenities compliment the equestrian use of the site. Therefore, staff would recommend approval of the applicant's request to reduce the number of horse stalls and hay storage rooms and replace with the amenities as specified above be accepted and that the 2 horse stall/hay storage room buildings shown as "future" on the revised plan be completed prior to completion of the subdivision. Staff Planner: Steve Hayes Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Previously approved plans for Equestrian Area (Lot"A") Exhibit "D" - Previous Action Comments from Trails Advisory and Design Review Committees Note: In addition, full size plans of the proposed revisions are attached to these comments. ACTION: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended approval of the proposal modification as presented. ar =r 44, r?•96-1 7:.' 'ra��t'dt,^`R�. Tl 7 _ c �' C�✓..z��y ti..L. .. _ _s � .-. ���� � .�- [ s t""r.; -.�^• „"'.�err.__. y i w as as IL a a `` i gm Upw Vo Ar W. wdb -WOM 4 40 .T DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION FOR TT 12659 Date: September 5, 1985 Members Present: Suzanne Chitiea, Dave Barker, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Bruce Cook Recommended approval . Recommended approval subject to the following conditions of approval : Recommended that the project be revised for additional Committee Review as follows: Did not recommend approval as follows: 1. Revisions should be incorporated into the equestrian area (Lot A) as follows : - Trailer parking spaces should be designed as pull- through. - Some of the trailer spaces should be large enough to accommodate 4-horse trailers. - Gates on the central arena should be provided on the east and west ends, as opeosed to the north and south sides. - Bleachers should be made available for use. - Utilities, pad, etc. , should be made available to accommodate future installation of an announcer's booth. - Ramps on manure pits should be more gradual , and a landing should be provided at the top. - Manure pits should be located on inside of loop road further away from the houses. - Horse washing areas require a cement pad, and the spigot is to be located outside of railing. - Hitching posts should be positioned adjacent to both ends of all tack rooms. - Horse watering troughs should be provided. - Feeders and water basins on individual horse stalls J should be positioned on outside of stall fencing. l� - 5-rail high fencing should be used on horse stalls. Metal tack rooms are not very durable; consider alternative types of construction. 2. The equestrian easement on the west side of Lot 129 should be extended westerly along the south side of Lot 128 to align the trail provided along the east side of Lot 92. 3. A final comprehensive design of the equestrian area including but not necessarily limited to a standard design for all tack room construction, a landscaping and irrigation plan, a lighting plan, and details of the rest room/caretaker facilities shall be brought back for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to final recordation of the map. 4. Design of the perimeter treatment of the tract including but not necessarily limited to details of perimeter walls/fences, landscaping, and community trails shall be brought back for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to final recordation of the map. EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tr 12956(Design Review)- Gary Mitchell and Associates-- a residential subdivision of 135 single family homes on 67.6 acres located on the west side of Etiwanda Ave. , south of 24th St. June 17 1987 Staff present: Bruce Cook, Scott Murphy, Dan Coleman Members present: Christine Benoit, Suzanne Chitiea, Pam Henry, Peter Tolstoy ISSUES: This tract was approved on November 13, 1985 as a Tract Subdivision, i .e. the subdivision map was approved, no building arcl�itec_fUr+as proposea. Building architecture will be applied for at a later date as a Design Review. A common area , Lot A, was included on the Map to be developed as a private equestrian center. A condition of approval was that the proposed development of the equestrian area was to be submitted for the review and approval of the Trails Committee. ACTION: The Trails Committee has reviewed this project and has found incosis- tencies between the parameters for the design of the equestrian lot as est- ablished by the Planning Commission per Resolution 85-168 and its actual design as. submitted at this time. The design of the equestrian lot will need to be 'revised, and the revised plan submitted for the review and approval of the Trails Committee. The plan for the equestrian lot is to be revised as follows : 1) Ramps on manure pits should not exceed 8% grade. To avoid long ramps use switchbacks with landings. 2) Shoe loop access road as having art asphalt surface. 3) Show parking stalls as marked with double striping per City standards. 4) Show shade covers on horse corrals as 12' deep, not 8' deep. Shade covers to be located on inside of corral ,i .e. facing towards the arena and away from the loop road. 5) Feeders/waterers to be located on outside of corral . This is to facilitate their maintenance, access is easier for people. Horses can access them through gaps in the fence. 6) Eliminate corral gate on outside of corral ,i .e. the side opposite of the shade cover. 7) Corral fence- .to be 5-rail , 5 ' high. 4-rail fence shown . 8) Provide 3 water troughs in locations indicated on the red-line plan for Lot A. 9) Relocate horse wash areas to areas between tack roons as shown on the red- line plan for Lot A. Provide details of horse crash area. Is it a concrete slab? How does it drain? How are you preventing vrater runoff to surrounding area to prevent creation of mud pits? 10) Show hitching posts positioned at end of all tack rooms. Provide detail of hitching post. 11) Indicate surfacing material for main arena. Should be some type of sandy loam to permit good drainage and avoid creation of excessive mud or dust. 12) The 4 manure pit sites are to be evenly dispersed throughout the site and not be located adjacent to each other as shown on submitted plan. 13) Provide at least 20 ' of separation between tack rooms at the southwest portion of Lot A where the bridal path between houses accesses the equstrian arena . Equestrian Advisory Committee Comment Sheet Tr 12956(Design Review)/Gary Mitchell p. 2 14) Angle trailer storage spaces at opposite angle of vehicle- parking spaces. Also, create a storage bay to increase the setback of the storage spaces from the opposite side of the access loop. The equestrian area will be a separate lot under common ownership of all property owners within the tract. A Homeowner' s Association will be necessary to manage maintenance of the equestrian facility. The City is to be made a part of the CCR' s such that the provisions of the CCR's cannot be changed without City approval . Also, it should be specifically indicated in the CCR' s that use of the facilities by outside groups for a rental fee would be permissable. i TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COWENT SHEET August 19, 1987 Project Description: Tract 12659 Design Review - Security Management - A residential subdivision of 135 single family lots on 67 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. Issues: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the plans for the equestrian lot on June 17, 1987 for compliance with the conditions of approval . The Committee indicated that a number of modifications were necessary to bring the lot up to City standards. The applicant is now requesting consideration on a proposal to eliminate the bleachers and the announcers stand due to concerns regarding liability. The applicant has stated that some type of seating will be provided. Action: The Committee stated that the deletion of the bleachers and announcer's stand was acceptable. The Committee felt, however, that wood benches would not provide adequate visibility into the arena. Therefore, the Committee that a low riser be provided for seating. The Committee also stated that the plans did not reflect changes requested at the last meeting. The changes should be incorporated into the plans for further Committee review and approval . TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET MARCH 15, 1989 Project Description: Tentative Tract 12659 - Blanton - A residential of 132 single family lots on 67.6 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and 24th Street. Issues: rac 12659 was originally approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985 . In exchange for allowing lots smaller than 20.000 square feet, the project included a large equestrian lot for the keeping of horses. In reviewing the street plans for 24th Street, the Engineering Division has requested that the grading be modified to drain to the street. This could result in extremely high slopes and retaining walls within the project. To try and minimize these concerns, the applicant is requesting the deletion of a local equestrian trail along 24th Street. The applicant feels that the deletion of the trail will not impact the subdivision for the following reasons : 1. There is a Community Trail along 24th that is directly ajacent to the local trail . The trails are separated by a wall/fence. Other internal trails can connect to the Community Trail . 2. No horses are allowed on individual lots due to their size. Therefore, the normal need for rear yard access is not present. Action: The Committee recommended approval of the modification. 1 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET f'c.�7r�nry a �l �95� PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tract 12659 - BLANTON - A residential subdivision of 132 single family homes on 67 .6 acres of land located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th Street. BACKGROUND: This tract was approved on November 13 , 1985 as a Tract Subdivision , i .e. the subdivision map was approved , no building architecture was proposed . Building architecture would be applied for at a later date as a Design Review. A common area , Lot A, was included on the Map to be developed as a private equestrian center. A condition of approval was that the proposed development of the equestrian area was to be submitted for- the review and approval of the Trails Committee. The Trails Committee reviewed the project on June 17 and August 19, 1987 and found inconsistencies between the parameters for the design of the equestrian lot as established by the Planning Commission per Resolution 85-168 and its actual design as submitted at that time. The design of the equestrian lot was to be revised per the attached June 17 , 1987 action comments , and the revised plan submitted for the review and approval of the Trails Committee. ACTION: At their February 21 , 1990 meeting, the Trails Committee reviewed the plans for the equestrian Lot A for completion of revisions addressing inconsistencies between the proposed design and that established by Planning Commission as attached . Following are Committee comments as a result of that review: 1 . Do not issue final for Phase One occupancy until plans are approved by Trails Committee and Design Review Committee. 2 . Move horse stalls back from paved area . 3 . Road for autos and trucks shall be asphalt paving . 4 . Provide 20 feet between barns and access drive . Signs shall be posted on building walls to prohibit parking in front of stalls . 5 . Area in front of barns should be decomposed granite. 6 . Hay should be provided in each stall - 7 units per barn (6 + 1 storage) . Hay storage rooms were acceptable as proposed within each stable building (barn) . 7 . Future hay storage building should be shown on plans . 8. Wash racks should be located where hay storage is proposed . 9. Wash racks should be located close to paving for drainage. 10. Engineer shall work out drainage for proposed equestrian center. 11 . Show 4 possible manure pit locations. 12 . Delete the 2 small barns on current proposal . 13 . Phasing plan is still valid . 14 . Planning Commission must modify condition for bleachers to accommodate rental bleachers . 15 . Provide grassy berms with seating which can be substituted for some of the currently proposed bleachers . There are too many bleachers currently proposed . 16 . The shade covers and the horse stalls were considered acceptable as proposed. 17 . The Committee supported locating feeders and watering devices on the inside of the stalls . However, a condition of approval required these items be located on the outside. It was suggested that both locations could be used . 18. The elimination of the gates on' the outside of the stalls was acceptable as proposed . 19. No leach lines will be accepted for wash area . 20. Hitching posts were acceptable as proposed . 21 . A natural surfacing material shall be selected for the main arena . Submit material specifications to the Planning Division for review and approval . The Committee stated that the project will need to go back to the Planning Commission to modify any of the attached Conditions of Approval from Resolution No . 85-168 . The Committee requested that the project be placed on the Commercial /Industrial Design Review Committee Agenda for review of the stables . The Trails Advisory Committee will still need to review the proposed project for final compliance with conditions as required in Resolution No. 85-168 . BA:jfs RESIDENTIAL CONSENT- CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA April 19, 1990 1 . TR 10035 - CAL PROP Steve H. ) Review site plan for lot 2. Committee Action : The Committee (McNiel , We Coleman) recommended approval of the modified site plan for lot 2 as presented. 2. TR 12659 - BLANTON Steve H. ) Review to tack room colors and materials Committee Action: The Committee (McNiel , Weinberger, Coleman) recommended approval of the material (color samples) for the horse tack rooms as presented. 3. DR 11626 - H S S Tom) Revised elevations. Committee Action : The Committee (McNiel , Weinberger, Coleman) approved the revised elevations with the following modifications: 1 . All exterior chimneys should utilize the accent material (i .e, stone or brick) of the front elevations. 2 . Additional stone or brick should be added to selected elevations . TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET June 20 , 1990 Project Description: Tract 12659 - BLANTON - A residential subdivision of 135 single family omes on 67.6 acres ot lana located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, south of 24th Street. Background: The tract was approved on November 13, 1985 as a Tract S-ubT v i's ion i .e, the subdivision map was approved, no b u i TT ng arc itecture was proposed. Building architecture would be applied for at a later date as a Design Review. A common area, Lot A, was included on the Map to be developed as a private equestrian center. A condition of approval was that the proposed development of the equestrian area was to be submitted for the review and approval of the Trails Committee. The Trails Committee reviewed the project on June 17 and August 19, 1987 and found inconsistencies between the perimeters for the design of the equestrian lot as established by the Planning Commission per Resolution 85-168 and its actual design as submitted at that time. The design of the equestrian lot was to be revised and the revised plan submitted for the review and approval of the Trails Committee. Comments: At their February 21 , 1990 meeting, the Trails Committee revie wecT the plans for the equestrian-Lot A for completion of revisions addressing inconsistencies between the proposed design and that established by Planning Commission . The Trails Advisory Committee should review the plans at this meeting to determine final completion of the following comments generated from the February 21, 1990 meeting : 1. Move horse stalls back from paved area. 2. Road for autos and trucks shall be asphalt paving. 3. Provide 20—feet between barns and access drive. Si ns shall be posted on building walls to prohibit parking in front o stalls . 4. Area in front of barns should be decomposed granite . 5. Hay should be provided in each stall - 7 units per barn (6 + 1 storage) . - Hay storage rooms were acceptable as proposed within each stable building (barn) . 6. Future hay storage building should be shown on plans. T 12659 - Blanton Page 2 7. Wash racks should be located where hay storage is proposed. 8. Wash racks should be located close to paving for drainage. 9. Engineer shall work out drainage for proposed equestrian center. 10. Show 4 possible manure pit locations. 11. Delete the 2 small barns on current proposal . 12. Phasing plan is still valid and should be kept. 13. Provide grassy berms with seating which can be substituted for some of the currently proposed bleachers. There are too many bleachers currently proposed. 14 . The shade covers and the horse stalls were considered acceptable as proposed. 15 . The Committee supported locating feeders and watering devices on the inside of the stalls. However, a condition of approval required these items be located on the outside. It was suggested that both locations could be used. 16. The elimination of the gates on the outside of the stalls was acceptable as previously proposed. 17. No leach lines will be accepted forwash area . 18. Hitching posts were acceptable as previously proposed. 19. A natural surfacing material shall be selected for the main arena. Submit material specifications to the Planning Division for review and approval . Action: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the revised plans for the equestrian Lot A and recommended approval . The remaining issues (mentioned below) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division, prior to scheduling the item before the Design Review Committee on Consent Calendar. 1 . Relocate the "parking prohibited" signs on the walls on the buildings or provide a detail of the post signs . 2. Note that the area in front of barns shall be a compacted decomposed granite. T 12659 - Blanton Page 3 3. Provide an additional hay storage unit on the east side of the middle row of stalls in Phase II. 4. Wash racks located where the hay storage is proposed is acceptable. A detail of the hose connections adjacent to the wash racks and a detail of the drains for the wash racks shall be provided. 5. Provide a grading and drainage plan of the entire area . Specific details of arena area and wash rack drainage should be provided. Run-off should generally sheet flow to the south. 6. The grassy berms should be provided close to the arena area for seating purposes. Toe of slope should be 10 to 15 feet from the arena. The top of the berms should be flat to facilitate lawn chairs. A permanent bench seating should be provided, cut into the side of the berms. Details of the permanent seating shall be provided on the revised plans for review and approval . 7. The Committee strongly encouraged that feeders/watering/devices be located on the outside of stalls only . 8. Details of the wash areas shall include concrete curbing and a heavy broom finish concrete surface and curbing. 9. Hitching posts shall be constructed of a heavy , 4 irch diameter steel pipe. Details shall -be shown on the revised plans. Specifications are available from the Community Services Department. 10. Provide a sample of the surface material for the arena. Provide information of an examplary site where material has been used. 11. Decomposed granite shall be used for the surface material inside all tack rooms. A minimum depth of 4 irches non-compacted material shall be provided inside the tack rooms and paddock areas. 12. The hot walker shall be included within Phase I. 13. Provide a manual irrigation system for dust control for the main arena and the lunging area. Provide details on the revised irrigation plan. RESIDENTIAL CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS AGENDA July 5, 1990 1. DR 88-03 - A.E. SMITH erry Review of spa and tot lot area. Committee Action: The Comrt�itdtee (McNiel a d Coleman recommen a approval of �e spa an tot lot area subject to the following conditions: 1. Provide decorative , pilasters finished to match the building at all corners and on each side of the gates around the spa and tot lot. 2. Provide a solid 6 foot masonry wall between the spa area and the adjacent private patio. 3. Provide self-closing, self-latching gates on both the spa and tot lot area. 2. TT 13898 - LEWIS re Review enclosed stairways. Committee Action: The Committee (McNiel , Coleman) reviewed the plans and recommended approval subject to the following: 1. Corbels should be provided underneath the new balcony areas and should be consistent with the corbels used elsewhere on the buildings. 3. TT 12659 - BLANTON TTfe-v—e Rodeo arena site plan. Committee Action: The Committee (McNiel , Melcher, Coleman) recommended approval of the conceptual site and landscape plans for the rodeo arena as presented. The applicant can now proceed to prepare working drawings that incorporate all conditions from previous Trails Advisory Committee meetings. CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 8:25 p.m. Tom Grahn September 16, 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-19 -CASTILLO COMPANY. INC. - The development of a commercial shopping center consisting of a 65,155 square foot grocery/drug store,two satellite buildings totaling 6,000 square feet and 6,200 square feet, and two drive-thru pads totaling 3,500 square feet and 2,500 square feet on 9.82 acres of land in the Community Commercial District (Subarea 2) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 207-102-03, 05, 08, 15, 20, 21, and 49. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Tom Grahn The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project. CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS 1 8:10 P.M. Brent LeCount September 16, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 96-15 - TMP HOMES - A request to eliminate decorative brick entry portals for a previously approved tract and design review for 42 single family homes within Tract 13566 in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located south of Wilson Avenue and west of the I-15 Freeway - APN: 226-311-27 and 226-321-01. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brent Le Count The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS September 16, 1997 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this time. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ✓. Brad Buller Secretary