HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/09/19 - Agenda Packet ACTION AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 19, 2006 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Cristine McPhail Pam Stewart Dan Coleman
Alternates: Lou Munoz Richard Fletcher Rich Macias
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All consent items heard at 7 p.m.)
(Vance/Shelley) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00165 - STAMATIS - A request
for the construction of a 3,756 square foot single-family house within the Very Low
Residential and Hillside District, located at 9021 Reales Street.
(Tabe/Shelley) HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00103 - FRANK SALHAB - A request
for a two-story 6,600 square foot home on a 36,463 square foot lot in the Very
Low Residential District (.1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 10458 Hidden
Farm Road - APN: 1074-121-16.
(Mike S./Shelley) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16884 - BLU CROIX, LTD (on behalf of
Verizon California) - A request to subdivide a parcel of 0.86 acre of land into
four parcels, three of which will be sold for future residential development, the
other which will remain in ownership with Verizon for continued use as a
telephonic switching facility in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units
per acre), located at 6433 Puma Place - APN: 0225-271-49. This action is
categorically exempt per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions.
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding
their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,
although the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
7:10 p.m.
(Donald/Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2006-00381 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - The development of a
136-room hotel, including a bar, totaling 65,292 square feet on 2.92 acres of land
in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6), within the Haven Avenue Overlay
District, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and Center Avenue -
APN: 0210-391-21. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17303 and
Development Review and Master Plan DRC2005-00458. This action includes
approval of an addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative
Declaration by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2005, pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act Section 15164.
DRC AGENDA
September 19, 2006
Page 2
7:40 p.m.
(Mike D./Joe) . DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00197 - FOREST CITY - A request to
construct a single-story, 31,400 square foot retail building on a combined area
of 2.63 acres of land within the Route 66 Outparcels area of Victoria Gardens
Lifestyle Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria Community Plan,
located at 8048 Victoria Gardens Lane - APN: 0227-464-42, 51, and 54.
8:00 p.m.
(Emily/Cam) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
SUBTT18034 - HILLVIEW DEVELOPMENT LLC - A request to subdivide
3.83 gross acres of land into 7 lots in the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of East Avenue
and 1-210 Freeway - APN: 0225-381-06.
8:20 p.m.
(Emily/Cam) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00382 - K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST
HOMES AT RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC - Proposed 97 detached single-family
homes on 34.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units
per acre), located north of Day Creek Boulevard - APN: 0225-071-48 and 50.
Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1. Staff found the project to be
within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report
(State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council
on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not
already considered in that Environmental Impact Report.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Vance Pomeroy September 19, 2006
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-00165 - STAMATIS - A request for the
construction of a 3,756 square foot single-family house within the Very Low Residential and Hillside
District, located at 9021 Reales Street.
Design Parameters: The proposed project is a single-family home subject to design review by
the Design Review Committee (DRC) because it is within the Hillside Overlay District adopted
by City Council Ordinance No. 628. The project site is a down-slope lot on the south side of
Reales Street in a neighborhood of single-family homes and vacant lots on all sides and across
the street. Most of the lots in the neighborhood are filled with improved single-family homes.
The proposed house is below the maximum 25 percent lot coverage allowed in the zone. The
house is designed with a raised floor system to minimize grading.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
The owner of the property originally submitted a different design with a different architect. Since
changing the design and architect, the applicant has worked closely with staff to work out all the
technical and design issues. The project has improved the level of quality and compliance.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Vance Pomeroy
The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Tabe Van der Zwaag September 19, 2006
HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00103 - FRANK SALHAB - A request for a two-story.
6,600 square foot home on a 36,463 square foot lot in the Very Low Residential District
(.1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 10458 Hidden Farm Road - APN: 1074-121-16.
Background: The lot is in the Hillside Overlay District. The intent of the Hillside Development
Regulations is to minimize grading and ensure that the form, mass, profile, and architectural
features of the house are designed to blend with the natural terrain, preserve the character and
profile of the slope, and give consideration to the size of the lot and configuration.
Recommendations by the Committee will be forwarded to the Planning Director for review and
action.
Design Parameters: The proposed residence is located on the north side of Hidden Farm Road
on a parcel of about 36,463 square feet. The site is bordered by single-family residences to the
west and south; a flood control channel owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control
District to the north; and by Haven Avenue to the east.
The applicant proposes building a 9,391 square foot two-story structure with a below grade side
entrance garage. The floor plan includes a single step of 1.25 feet that runs just south of the
central hallway. The garage is tucked under the house and is between 7 to 8 feet below the
natural grade; therefore, requiring Planning Commission review. The Development Code
encourages designs that incorporate below grade rooms to reduce the effective bulk of the
overall structure. Additionally, while the applicant is extensively grading the western portion of
the lot to construct the house and garage, about 140 feet of the eastern portion of the lot will not
be graded and the existing mature trees will be preserved in place. The proposed residence
meets all Hillside Overlay requirements including height limits, setbacks, and lot coverage. The
project design including grading and architecture is consistent with other homes in the
neighborhood.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Ma or Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
None.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal as
submitted.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Tabe Van der Zwaag
The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented.
CONSENT CALENDAR
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Mike Smith September 19, 2006
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM16884 - BLU CROIX, LTD (on behalf of Verizon California) - A
request to subdivide a parcel of 0.86 acre of land into four parcels, three of which will be sold for future
residential development, the other which will remain in ownership with Verizon for continued use as a
telephonic switching facility in the Low Residential District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre), located at 6433
Puma Place - APN: 0225-271-49. This action is categorically exempt per California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions.
Design Parameters: The project site is located in the Low (L) Residential District, at 6433 Puma Place.
The project site is Lot 25 of Tract 15866, the remaining parcel of a 25-lot subdivision that was approved
on September 13, 2000. The project site is generally rectangular in shape with approximate dimensions
of about 350 feet (east to west) by 120 feet (north to south), with an overall area of about 37,464 square
feet. The east side of the parcel site is developed with a building of about 1,250 square feet that houses
Verizon's communications equipment and a small parking lot/storage area. The remainder of the site is
undeveloped. The properties to the north, east, and west are single-family residences that were
constructed relatively recently. To the south, is the Milliken Avenue off-ramp from the 1-210 Freeway.
The California Public Utilities Commission requires all public utilities to minimize assets not directly
related to their operations. Therefore, the applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel into four (4)
parcels. Parcel 1 will have an area of 13,455 square feet while Parcels 2 thru 4 will each have a lot area
of 8,000 square feet. As proposed, all lots meet the City's standards for minimum lot size, depth, and
width. Parcels 2, 3, and 4 will be similar in size to the surrounding lots. The existing building will remain
on Parcel 1. Included as part of Parcel 1, will be a narrow strip behind Parcels 2 thru 4 about 15 feet
wide that will be used by Verizon for maintenance access to protect various underground
easements/improvements. As the applicant has no intent to develop Parcels 2 thru 4, they will be sold to
others. Therefore, proposals for development of homes on these parcels will be the responsibility of the
eventual owner(s). Compliance of these homes with the City's development standards will be verified
during the Building and Safety plan check.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
As noted above, Parcel 1 includes a 15-foot wide segment that will be between Parcels 2, 3, and 4 and
the 1-210 Freeway sound wall for access. The Building and Safety Department is requiring that the
applicant also provide a drainage easement for Parcels 2, 3, and 4 to allow runoff from those lots into the
15-foot wide segment that will the drain towards Milliken Avenue; the applicant is aware of this
requirement and will provide the easement. This solution is more favorable than raising the south side of
each lot (to cause runoff to flow to Cougar Court); as doing so, would raise the finished elevation of each
lot by about 4 to 6 feet and diminish the effectiveness of the existing sound wall (about 12 -16 feet in
height) that would mitigate the noise impact, on Parcels 2, 3, and 4 generated by traffic on the 1-210
Freeway.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal as submitted.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Mike Smith
The Committee Recommended approval of the project as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Donald Granger September 19, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00381 -
CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - The development of a 136-room hotel, including a bar,
totaling 65,292 square feet on 2.92 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6),
within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the northeast corner of Fourth Street and
Center Avenue - APN: 0210-391-21. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17303 and
Development Review and Master Plan DRC2005-00458. This action includes approval of an
addendum to the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration by the Planning
Commission on November 9, 2005, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act
Section 15164.
The project was reviewed on September 5, 2006, by the Design Review Committee (McPhail,
Munoz and Coleman). At the meeting, the applicant presented a revised Site Plan which
satisfied the landscape planter issue discussed in the Design Review Comments. After the
reviewing the colored renderings and architectural plans, the Committee directed the applicant
to revise the proposed signage in order to be compliant with the height and square footage
requirements of the Sign Ordinance. The Committee indicated support for the materials and
proposed architectural concept for the Aloft Hotel, but directed the applicant to enhance and
modify the elevations to include articulation and pop-outs that create relief and visual interest
which matches the caliber of the two primary office buildings that flank Haven Avenue and
Fourth Street. The Committee requested that the applicant make the revised changes and that
the project be scheduled for review at the September 19, 2006, Design Review Meeting. The
applicant agreed to revise the plans in response to the Committee's comments. REVISED
PLANS WILL BE AVAILABLE AT THE MEETING.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the revised plans and
provide comments at the Design Review Committee meeting.
Desicin Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Donald Granger
The applicant presented a new perspective rendering. The Committee recommended approval
subject to the following changes:
• Extend the aluminum skin to the next window line on the east and south elevations.
• Add a vertical element, the same as the south elevation, to the north elevation.
• Reduce the signs to a maximum of 150 feet.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m. Mike Diaz September 19, 2006
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00197 - FOREST CITY - A request to construct a single-story
31,400 square foot retail building on a combined area of 2.63 acres of land within the Route 66
Outparcels area of Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center in the Mixed Use District of the Victoria
Community Plan, located at 8048 Victoria Gardens Lane- APN: 0227-464-42, 51, and 54.
Design Parameters: The subject project site is located at the southeast corner of Victoria
Gardens Lane and Monet Avenue within the 13.3-acre area known as the Route 66 area of the
Victoria Gardens Master Plan. Originally comprised of Lots 4, 13, and 16 of Parcel Map
SUBTPM15716-2, the lots have been merged together to form a single 2.65-acre site with
141 on-site parking spaces. Reciprocal parking agreements exist between the adjacent
properties to allow general use of parking on the adjacent properties. The property
owner/developer, Forest City, has installed all interior roadways, parking areas, walkways, and
perimeter landscaping within the Route 66 area.
Projects within the Route 66 area are required to reflect an architectural style found on the
famed highway. Projects within the Route 66 area are subject to final approval by the Planning
Director following a review and approval of the project design by the Design Review Committee
(DRC).
Proiect Description and Architectural Design: The proposed single-story retail building is
designed to house up to nine lease spaces and will be the largest building within the Route 66
area. The shape of the building reflects the shape of the underlying corner site. The design
was inspired by the architecture of the 1928 California Petroleum Gas Station building that was
located on Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles and the Petaluma (CA) Fire Department building
built in 1935. As such, the design of the new building combines elements of the
Mediterranean/Moorish/Spanish styles and features two very notable architectural elements in
the form of a large mosaic tiled dome and tower element. Both of these elements will be softly
illuminated, concealed light fixtures.
Except for the dome and tower elements, the "flat' roof of the building is concealed with a wrap
around parapet that is a typical feature of commercial retail buildings. Pilasters of varying
heights are used to add architectural interest and break up the wall plane and define lease
space openings around the building. Window awnings are proposed for the front entrances of
each lease space.
The concrete plaster (Santa Barbara finish) on the primary wall element of the building is
accented by decorative tile at the base of the building and pilasters, at window surrounds, and
at the top of the parapet. The design and selection of colors of the tile work on the building face
is coordinated with the pattern proposed for the dome. The tile colors are black, white, and two
grey-toned green colors reminiscent of 1920 era.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
DRC2006-00197 — FOREST CITY
September 5, 2006
Page 2
Major Issues: None. Staff believes the proposed building is a well-designed and elegant
commercial structure that will serve both as a prominent landmark within the Route 66 area and
act as an architectural link to the heart of the Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center. The design for
the building is visually interesting and keeping with the design goals for the Route 66 area.
Secondary Issues: Staff has identified the following secondary issues for discussion:
1. Provide a larger scale Landscape Plan for the front of the building. Staff recognizes the
small area at the front of the building but would suggest the incorporation of large
freestanding pots with plant materials to help soften and enhance the appearance of the
building. Proposed plant materials should provide enough visual interest and variety to
complement the architecture of the new building.
2. Provide more final color and a materials board for review and approval by the Committee.
Code Issues: The following items are a matter of City ordinance and shall be incorporated into
the project design without discussion:
1. All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from direct view from the street by the
parapet wall of the building.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and
recommend review and approval by the Planning Director.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Mike Diaz
The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:00 P.M. Emily Cameron September 19, 2006
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18034 - HILLVIEW
DEVELOPMENT LLC - A request to subdivide 3.83 gross acres of land into 7 lots in the Very
Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the northwest corner of
East Avenue and 1-210 Freeway - APN: 0225-381-06.
The property is located on the northwest corner of East Avenue and the 1-210 Freeway. To the
north, the property fronts Chickasaw Road which will be left as an improved cul-de-sac, with
curb and gutter. Proir to the applicant submitting the project, a portion of the property was
acquired from Cal-Trans by the developer to create a developable lot. There is a concrete
drainage channel that runs east to west through the property and is visible on Lot 1. The
existing drainage channel was originally constructed as part of the 1-210 Freeway. A private
equestrian trail abutts the west property line and runs parallel to Lot 1. The adjacent property
owner has agreed to allow access to this easement. All 7 lots meet the minimum Code
requirements for the Very Low Residential District. According to the Acoustical Analysis (March
1, 2006), a perimeter block wall will be required on the south side of the property along all lots.
To accommodate the recommendations, a wall extending up to a maximum of 12 feet is
required, along with a variance at the time of Development/Design Review of the homes.
At this time, the applicant is proposing only to subdivide the property and sell to a developer for
development of the homes. The applicant has worked diligently with staff to include wall heights
and the themed rock walls abutting East Avenue which will be required with residential
development on this major street. The required wall heights and variance requirements will be
included as part of the Standard Conditions for Planning Commission review and approval.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
None - The applicant has worked diligently with staff. No major issues exist.
Secondary Issues: None
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. The Planning Commission will require a mix of single-story homes (minimum of 10 to
15 percent) at the time of development. Staff will not support a variance for side yard
setback to meet this requirement.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Emily Cameron
The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:20 p.m. Emily Cameron September 19, 2006
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00382 - K. HOVNANIAN FORECAST HOMES AT
RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC - Proposed 97 detached single-family homes on 34.1 acres of land
in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located north of Day Creek
Boulevard - APN: 0225-071-48 and 50. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226-1.
Staff found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental
Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on
August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already
considered in that Environmental Impact Report.
Background: On August 1, 2001, the City Council approved Development Agreement DA01-01.
This agreement is for the Rancho Etiwanda Estates, a 632-lot Master Planned Community
encompassing approximately 249 acres. The Development Agreement requires the applicants
to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, incorporating
the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side on
garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles.
The Development Agreement required the Low Residential requirements for all lots within this
tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004, and infrastructure was installed. The
master developer has agreed to install the main access of the gated community, as well as the
decorative perimeter walls. These walls will be consistent throughout the entire master planned
community. The site is bordered by Etiwanda Avenue to the west, Stillwater Place to the south,
and the Southern California Edison Corridor to the northeast and northwest.
Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood,
which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the Etiwanda North Specific Plan
(ENSP). The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for
at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch; Monterey, or San Juan. Up to one-third of
the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Revival. The proposed
homes are two-story with one floor plan, which incorporates significant single-story elements.
"Upper Etiwanda" Architectural Styles
Primary Styles per Secondary Styles per Proposed Styles
ENSP ENSP
Bungalow
Ranch
Monterey Monterey 25.8%
San Juan San Juan 40.2%
Country Count 26.8%
Victorian
Santa Barbara Revival Santa Barbara (7.2
The two-story plans have been designed with 4 floor plans and 4 architectural styles. The
proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Monterey, and Country, and a small percentage of
Santa Barbara.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
DRC2006-00382 — K. HOVANIAN FORECAST HOMES AT RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC
September 19, 2006
Page 2
The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron detail, decorative tile as an entry accent, and
recessed windows. The mix of elevations include: front balconies, courtyards, with rock work
and porches. The Monterey elevation incorporates shutter detail, siding and brick accents. The
Country elevation uses the same level of detail, with stone veneer and/or siding, shutter detail
and wood outlookers. The Santa Barbara elevation includes arched windows, pre-cast columns
and shutters, similar to the Monterey elevation.
The majority of the homes have only optional extended porches, courtyards, and standard front
balconies on the two-story homes. The upgraded features are proposed on the corner lots only.
All homes incorporate decorative garage doors and chimneys to match the architectural style of
the home. The developer is proposing to build the homes in 10 phases with four model homes.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Articulate all sides of all houses to avoid two-story "box-on-box" appearance. Staff
recommends adding movement to Plan 4 (left side). Also the pop-outs proposed at
"enhanced elevations" and shown as only an option shall be provided as standard.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. The optional courtyards proposed shall be provided as a standard feature on 25 percent of
the homes.
2. Provide balconies as standard on approximately 40 percent of the homes. This should
include balconies on corner lots, major streets, and any other rear yards that may be
visible from public view. Currently, only 10 balconies are proposed. Staff recommends
adding balconies on Lots 2, 3, 5, 14, 50, 61, 62, 64, 75, 77, 79, 88, 91, 93, and 95.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. The boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard
Landscape Plan per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval.
2. Driveways shall be scored in a pattern for additional entryway detail.
3. All corner side walls shall be setback 12 feet from the curb at the sidewalk if the property
line is adjacent.
4. Provide a dark accent color for all kickers below the roof line.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
DRC2006-00382 — K. HOVANIAN FORECAST HOMES AT RANCHO ETIWANDA, LLC
September 19, 2006
Page 3
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend
approval of the project subject to the above revisions.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Coleman
Staff Planner: Emily Cameron
The applicant presented revised plans. The Committee recommended approval of the project
subject to continuing brick veneer on the Monterey chimneys and siding on the Country
chimney, down to grade.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
September 19, 2006
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
R ctfully sub itted,
Dan Coleman '
Principal Planner