HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/06/05 - Agenda Packet ACTION AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY JUNE 5, 2007 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Michael Diaz
Alternates: Richard Fletcher Rich Macias
CONSENT CALENDAR
(All consent items start at 7 p.m.)
(Michael D./CAM) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2004-01290 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a
179,800 square foot storage facility on 4.33 gross acres of land in the General
Industrial District (Subarea 8), located on the north side of Arrow Route,
approximately 700 feet east of 1-15 Freeway-APN: 0229-021-66.
(Michael D./Willie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DRC2004-01244 -ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH — Continued review of
the proposal for the Church to modify the approved color scheme for the new
church buildings in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located on the north
side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Avenue and White Oak Avenue
-APN: 0208-354-01 and 04.
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding
their development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although
the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
7:20 p.m.
(Tabe/Shelley) HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2007-00194 - JONATHAN SALMAN - A request
to construct a two-story 5,868 square foot home on a 26,569 square foot lot in the
Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at
5074 Earl Court -APN: 1061-791-12.
7:40 p.m.
(Daniel/Willie) MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0.85-37 DRC2007-00134
- El POLLO LOCO - A request to expand the floor area of the existing fast food
restaurant by approximately 1,091 square feet in the Deer Creek Shopping Center in
the General Commercial (GC) District, located at 7746 Haven Avenue;
APN: 1077-401-31. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project
is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a
Class 1 exemption, under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. (e).2, Existing
Facilities.
DRC AGENDA
June 5, 2007
Page 2
8:00 p.m.
(Ring/Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW
DRC2006-00692 — ERIN MADISON - The request to develop a 36,154 square foot
industrial building in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 8), located south of
Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue -APN: 0229-171-10.
8:20 p.m.
(Mike S./Shelley) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00719 - HECTOR RUIZ - A
request to construct two (2) single-family residences, each with a total floor area of
about 9,900 square feet (footprint approx. 6,000 square feet) on parcels of 21,648
and 22,640 square feet in the Very Low (VL) Residential District at
Deer Canyon Drive; APN: 1074-471-26 and 27.
8:40 p.m.
(Mike S./Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
DRC2006-00986 - PCA ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: A proposal to construct a
concrete tilt-up building of 81,572 square feet (including second floor offices) on
two parcels of 4.77 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8, located
about 625 feet south of Arrow Route on the west side of Hickory Avenue
-APN: 0229-181-03 and 11.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the
Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes
per individual.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
CONSENT
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Michael Diaz June 5, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01290
- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to modify develop a 179,800 square foot self
storage facility on 4.33 gross acres of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8), located
on north side of Arrow Route, approximately 700 feet east of 1-15 Freeway -APN: 0229-021-66.
Design Parameters: Jordan Architects, on behalf of the new owners of the All-In Storage
(formerly named Outback Self Storage) project, is requesting a modification to the approved set
of plans for the development of a self storage facility at the above location. The project was
originally approved by the Planning Commission in August of 2005, as a four building complex
(labeled A-D) on a triangular shaped parcel. Three of the four buildings (B-D) are long narrow
single-story buildings placed along the periphery of the site. Building A is the largest building
and was approved as a 3-story, triangular shaped building in the middle of the site. The project
was acquired by the new owners in early 2007.
Proposed Changes to Approved Plans: After completing a market analysis of the area, the new
owners of the project propose to scale back the size of the project. The proposed changes to
approved plans are as follows:
• Reduce Building A from 3-stories to a single-story building.
• Approval to use split face block for non-street building elevations to be consistent
with split face block used for the building wall elevation facing Arrow Highway.
Since the project was previously approved by the Planning Commission, Staff is requesting
DRC review of the proposed changes to the approved plans and make a determination as to
whether or not this item should be forwarded to the full commission for a formal review of the
proposed modifications.
Staff Comments: Staff finds the proposed modifications to the approved plans are modest in
nature and appropriate and in keeping with the City's approval of the use for the subject site.
The proposed scaling back of the project size will result in less direct impacts to the area from
this use, and allow for a better looking project from the street. Staff believes, that a single-story
Building A will relate better (architecturally and visually) to the other single-story buildings on the
site. Finally, staff believes the use of split face block for all the exterior facing walls will be more
visually interesting and durable than the stucco walls previously approved.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee find the proposed
modifications to be appropriate and in keeping with nature of the project as previously approved
by the Planning Commission.
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Members Present: Michael Diaz
The Committee reviewed and approved the proposal of downsizing the previously approved
project. The Committee found the proposal to be acceptable because it retained the design
qualities of the previously approved project and determined that the applicant did not need to
return to the Planning Commission for further review of their request.
CONSENT
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Michael Diaz June 5, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2004-01244
- ABUNDANT LIVING FAMILY CHURCH — Continued review of the proposal for the Church to
modify the approved color scheme for the new church buildings in the Industrial Park District
(Subarea 7), located on the north side of Civic Center Drive, between Red Oak Avenue and
White Oak Avenue - APN: 0208-354-01 and 04.
Project Description and Architectural Design: This item is the continued review of a proposal by
the church to modify the approved exterior colors for the church facility. On May 1, 2007, the
church presented their initial proposal which was not approved by the Committee over concerns
regarding the number of and the intensity of the colors that were selected. The revised color
scheme builds on the original color scheme originally approved for the church while adding a
few more accent colors.
A revised color plan will be presented by the planner and the applicant during the meeting
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the revised proposal
and approve if the Committee finds it to be appropriate.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Michael Diaz
The Committee reviewed the second color proposal and approved the use of the additional
colors as presented. They found that the new colors were within the same tonal range and
complementary to the original three colors that were previously approved for the church facility.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:20 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag June 5, 2007
HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2007-00194 - JONATHAN SALMAN - A request to construct
a two-story 5,868 square foot home on a 26,569 square foot lot in the Very Low Residential
District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located at 5074 Earl Court -APN: 1061-791-12.
Background: The proposed single-family residence is located in the Very Low (VL) Residential
District and is included in the Hillside Overlay District. The intent of the Hillside Development
Regulations is to minimize grading and ensure that the form, mass, profile, and architectural
features of the house are designed to blend with the natural terrain, preserve the character and
profile of the slope, and give consideration to the size and configuration of the lot.
Recommendations by the Committee will be forwarded to the Planning Director for review and
action.
Design Parameters: The project site is located on the west side of Earl Court on a parcel of
about 26,569 square feet. The lot is located within the Kings Ranch gated community and was
rough graded at the time of the subdivision. The lot is roughly flat with existing retaining walls
located along the north, south, and west property lines. The lot is bordered by single-family
residences to the north, south, east, and west.
The applicant proposes constructing a 5,868 square foot two-story residence with two attached
two car garages totaling 910 square feet. The house is architecturally compatible with the
neighborhood and conforms to the design guidelines outlined in the Development Code
including carrying materials and architectural features to all elevations. The garages have been
placed perpendicular to the street, which reduces their visual dominance as viewed from the
street. The project meets the height limits, setbacks, and lot coverage requirements of the
Hillside Overlay District. The project will require a total 325 cubic yards of fill. The lot coverage
will be 16.5 percent, which is less than the maximum 25 percent permitted in the Very Low (VL)
Residential District. Staff asked the applicant to make a number of minor exterior changes that
will be reviewed at the time of full submittal. If the requested changes are not made, staff will
discuss these issues with the Committee at the time of the meeting.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal as
submitted.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag
The Committee recommended approval of the project as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:40 p.m. Daniel Correa June 5, 2007
MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 85-37 DRC2007-00134 - El POLLO
LOCO - A request to expand the floor area of the existing fast food restaurant by approximately
1,091 square feet in the Deer Creek Shopping Center in the General Commercial (GC) District,
located at 7746 Haven Avenue; APN: 1077-401-31. The Planning Department staff has
determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a
Class 1 exemption, under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301. (e).2, Existing Facilities.
Design Parameters: Armet Davis Newlove & Associates, representing El Polio Loco
Corporation, have submitted a request to remodel and expand the existing fast food restaurant
at the above location. To accommodate the remodel/expansion, the existing unoccupied,
1,750 square foot dental office building just north of the existing El Polio Loco restaurant will be
removed. At present there are 31 parking spaces on-site, but when the dental office building is
demolished 6 new parking spaces will be added on-site totaling 37 spaces. The restaurant is
located at the northwest corner of Town Center and Haven Avenue, at 7746 Haven Avenue;
APN: 1077-401-31. The original Conditional Use Permit for the existing fast food restaurant
was approved in 1987 (CUP87-77). No changes to the current hours of operation will occur.
Proiect Description and Architectural Design: The proposal includes an expansion of
approximately 1,091 square feet, including 661.6 square feet for the new and expanded dining
room, 394 square feet for customer restrooms, and 35.16 square feet to the outside patio area.
The addition to the building is designed to match the architecture of the existing building
including the use of a metal standing seam roof, stucco, recessed wall details, the accents, and
the dark bronze storefront window/door assembly. Anchoring the new addition is a new tower
element that will be slightly higher and wider than the existing tower. The outdoor patio will be
landscaped with either 7 (seven) Carrotwood or Eucalyptus trees and ground cover to match
that which is used in around the building and in the surrounding shopping center. Finally, the
applicant proposes to install new corporate signage which is conceptually shown on the new
building elevations. New signs for the building will be subject to the provisions of sign program
previously prepared and approved for the center.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project.
None.
Secondary Issues: Staff has identified several secondary issues for discussion:
1. Provide further information on the use/placement of exterior wall light fixtures. A catalog
cut of the light fixture is requested and should match the existing lights on the building.
2. Wall signs are not part of this review and require a separate review and approval process.
While the signs depicted on the plans are only conceptual in nature, the wall sign(s) and
logo are subject to the provisions of the sign program on file for the center. Signs which
do not conform to the criteria of the sign program will need to be changed and/or the sign
program for the center will need to be amended.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
June 5, 2007
Page 2
Code Issues: The following item is a matter of City Ordinance; however, it should be
incorporated into the project design discussion:
1. All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from direct view from the street by some
form, either by a parapet wall or some other kind of screening that can be incorporated
into the unique roof configuration or design.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval with the
revision listed above as submitted to the Planning Commission.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Daniel Correa
The project was approved as presented, and the applicant was directed to work with staff in
determining the appropriate type of identification signs for the business that were consistent with
the existing sign program for the center.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:00 p.m. Rina Leung June 5, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2006-00692
- ERIN MADISON - The request to develop a 36,154 square foot industrial building in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 8), located south on Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue
and Hickory Avenue - APN: 0229-171-10.
Design Parameters: The subject site is located on the southeast portion of the City on
Arrow Highway between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue. The project area is developed
with industrial uses (i.e., contractors' office/storage, outdoor storage areas, and truck/auto
repair). Currently, the street frontage of Arrow Highway lacks street improvements; therefore,
the applicant will be required to install curb and gutter, asphalt pavement to the centerline of the
street, a meandering sidewalk, a drive approach, street lights, and trees, along with other
improvements in the public right-of-way. Access to the site is via a new 35-foot wide drive-way
decorated with scored colored sandblasted concrete paving located on the west portion of the
site.
According to the Site Plan, the building will be located along the northeast portion of the site with
a dock located on the southwest (rear) portion of the site. The dock will not be visible from the
public right-of-way and will be located within an area covered by a roof and set back within the
interior of the building. Two additional dock doors are proposed along the southern portion of
the building in a location that is not visible from the public right-of-way. The Applicant will
provide the development with a total of 40 parking stalls, which complies with Development
Code requirements. Parking stalls are located along the south and west portions of the site.
Two gates are proposed along the interior of the project site. Since these gates will be located
at least 140 feet from the front property line, it is not anticipated that they would create cueing
impacts along Arrow Highway. In addition, 6 foot-high concrete panels will be utilized as fencing
along the rear portion of the site.
The project has included a tower entry element embellished with a metal seam curved roof and
a metal canopy. The entryway is further articulated with bronze reflective glazing, stale tiles,
and scored terra cotta tiles. Other decorative elements that have been incorporated on all
elevations include:
• Reveals; and
• Bronze reflective glazing; and
• Sand blasted concreted panels along the bottom portion of the building.
To provide further depth and interest, the architect has off set the foot print of the building to
avoid a "box" shape. Also, the height of the building varies from 30 feet to 34 feet to provide
vertical interest to the elevations.
The applicant has included 36-inch high berms along the front yard landscaping area with the
planting of Brisbane Box, Carolina Cherry and Austrian Willow trees, which will provide texture
and interest. The project also has included a concrete seating bench and an outdoor employee
area.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
June 5, 2007
Page 2
Staff Comments:
Staff has no major or secondary issues but does require the following conditions incorporated to
be included in the Planning Commission Resolution:
1. A detail of the decorative paving at the entrance shall be shown on the Construction
Plans.
2. A detailed landscaping plan shall be shown on the Construction Plans depicting the
location, size, and species.
3. A detail or elevation of the steel gate shall be shown on the Construction Plans. The steel
gate shall be painted to match the building.
4. The outdoor employee eating area(s) shall be covered with a decorative trellis shade
structure; a screen wall minimum of 3 feet high should surround the eating area(s), tables,
chairs, and the trash receptacles.
5. All wall-mounted light fixtures shall have a light pointed downwards to avoid glare.
6. All equipment, both ground- and roof-mounted, shall be completely screened and
architecturally compatible with the elevation design from the view of the surrounding
properties and the public rights-of-way. The Edison transformer location shall be shown
on the Construction Plans and screened with mature landscaping.
7. Electrical panels shall be located inside a cabinet within the building.
8. All downspouts on the building shall be inside walls of the building.
9. The paint scheme shall be in compliance with the approved colors by the Design Review
Committee.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and forward the
project to the Planning Commission for consideration.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Rina Leung
The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission as
presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:20 p.m. Mike Smith June 5, 2007
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00719 - HECTOR RUIZ - A request to
construct two (2) single-family residences, each with a total floor area of about 9,900 square
feet (footprint approximately 6,000 square feet) on parcels of 21,648 and 22,640 square feet in
the Very Low (VL) Res identia# ±r�ct<<�t nPer Canyon Drive -APN: 1074-471-26 and 27.
Background: The proposed single-rarnq residences were reviewed by the Design Review
Committee on March 20, 2007. The Committee did not accept the design for two principal
reasons:
• The unusual roof (a "truncated" roof with parapets) that was proposed for both
houses was inconsistent with the neighborhood and not typical for the residences in
general.
• The stone finishes on the north elevations of each house, were not uniformly applied
in equal proportions on the south, east, and west elevations. Also, trim should be
limited to one architectural design and material.
The applicant was directed to revise the proposal and resubmit for the Committee's review.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
The applicant has revised the roof of each house and he is now proposing two conventional
designs with two different pitches — 1:3 and 1:4 (the original roof pitch was 1:2) The applicant
has requested consideration of both and has a preference for the roof with a pitch of 1:3.
However, this pitch will cause the tower element to exceed the maximum height limit of 30 feet.
The 1:4 roof pitch will allow the tower element to be below this height limit. As the architecture
is fundamentally the same for both pitches, Staff recommends the 1:4 roof pitch as that roof
design better fulfills the intent of the Hillside Ordinance. Note that the revision only affects the
parts of the roof above the ceiling line at the second floor. The lower roofs are still 1:2.
The applicant has applied stone finish to all the elevations uniformly as directed. Furthermore,
he is using different stone types/stacking for each house to differentiate them. However, he
continues to mix different types of trims at the windows. On the first floor (of the east and west
house, respectively) limestone quoins and limestone columns are used while on the second
floor windows of both, foam trim is used. Staff recommends that only one type of trim be used
for both floors.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee approve the proposal subject
to the applicant using a 1:4 roof pitch on both houses and using only one window trim
material/design for each respective house.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Mike Smith
The Committee reviewed the modified plans and although they appreciated the new roof
change, they found the plans to be in need of major work before approval could be granted.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
June 5, 2007
Page 2
The Committee continued the item to an unspecified date so that the applicant could work more
carefully with their architect to clarifying their goals, select an architectural style for each home,
and develop a design that uses the appropriate design elements of each selected style in a
manner that avoids an 'overdone" appearance. Finally, in order to ensure a correct
interpretation of the plans, it was requested that building elevations be drawn with shading,
different line weights, and accurately drawn details.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:40 p.m. Mike Smith June 5, 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00986 - PCA
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: A proposal to construct a concrete tilt-up building of 81,572
square feet (including second floor offices) on two parcels with a combined area of 4.77 acres in
the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 8, located about 625 feet south of Arrow Route on
the west side of Hickory Avenue - APN: 0229-181-03 and 11.
Design Parameters: The subject site is about 330 feet wide (north-south) and about 630 feet
deep (east-west) with an overall area of about 207,900 square feet (4.77 acres). The site
appears to have been used previously for outdoor storage of material and vehicles. With the
exception of a metal building, there are no other permanent improvements and very limited
vegetation. To the north, south, and west are properties that have been used in a similar
manner. To the east of the site, across and parallel to Hickory Avenue, is a flood control
channel. The topography of the site is generally level, sloping in a southwesterly direction with
an elevation of about 1,146 feet at the northeast corner of the site and about 1,141 feet at the
southwest corner.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 2-story industrial warehouse building with an overall
floor area of 81,572 square feet. The majority of the building floor area, about 74,000 square
feet, will be on the first floor with only about 7,572 square feet on the second floor. The building
will be equally divided into two suites (Suite A and B). Each suite will have its own office area.
The offices for Suite A will be at the northeast corner of the building while the offices for Suite B
will be located at the south side of the building. This living area will be located at the south side
of the building. The site has two access points from Hickory Avenue. The dock doors and
loading areas are located along the north side of the building while on the western portion of the
property, there will be vehicle storage and a vehicle maintenance area (for washing and
refueling). Employee/visitor parking will be located along the south and east sides of the project
site.
The construction of the building will be comprised of concrete tilt-up panels. As required in the
Development Code, the building is designed with two primary building materials — concrete and
sandblasted concrete. Flagstone veneer and glass fulfill the requirement for secondary building
materials. The office areas will feature raised "tower" elements and will be architecturally
enhanced, consistent with the City's design standards, with vision/spandrel glass applied to the
full height of the tower, scored panels, and the decorative veneer. Articulated wall planes have
been incorporated on all elevations with the majority of these enhancements occurring along the
south elevation. A "crenellated" parapet will be provided on all the elevations. On the south
and east elevations "window" areas 8 feet wide by 9 feet high are incorporated in the building
walls.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project.
DRC ACTION AGENDA
June 5, 2007
Page 2
1. Consistent with the design standards described in the Development Code and the policies
of the Planning Commission requiring a 360-degree architecture:
a. Provide sandblasting on the lower portion of the tilt-up panels of the north and west
elevations to match the south and east elevations.
b. Provide 8 feet wide by 9 feet high glass panels on the north and west elevations to
match the south and east elevations.
2. Provide a second band of sandblasting on all elevations.
3. Provided that vehicle parking, storage, or access is not impeded, replace excess paved
areas along the north side of the building and along the north property line with
landscaping. These landscaped areas shall have a minimum width of 5 feet and include a
raised, 6-inch concrete curb.
4. Per Section 17.30.040.E.4.c, plant trees along the north property line at a rate of one tree
per 30 linear feet.
5. Reduce the height of the trellises located above the employee lunch areas so that they are
proportional to human height.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.
None.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1. Provide benches and trash receptacles at the assigned employee lunch areas.
2. Provide back racks near the entrance of each office area.
3. All roof-mounted equipment shall be adequately screened from view.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the application with the above-noted
revisions incorporated prior to review and action by the Planning Director.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, and Diaz
Staff Planner: Mike Smith
The Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Director as presented.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
June 5, 2007
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m.
R ectfully submi ed
e
Michael P. Diaz
Senior Planner