HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/02/19 - Agenda Packet ACTION AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY FEBRUARY 19, 2008 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Corky Nicholson
Alternates: Richard Fletcher Frances Howdyshell Ray Wimberly
CONSENT CALENDAR
NO ITEMS SUBMITTED
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
7:00 p.m.
(Mike S./Mark) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00438
- MICHAEL CHAI — Proposals to modify the site layout of a previously approved
development review application. The proposal contemplates reducing the floor area of
Building 5 by about 3,000 square feet and increasing the floor area of Building 1 B by
about 3,000 square feet. Included are slight changes to the building elevations. The
overall master-planned retail and office complex is comprised of two 2-story office
buildings of 28,000 square feet (each), three single-story retail buildings of
17,500 square feet (combined), and three single-story restaurant pad buildings of
17,000 square feet (combined) on three parcels (combined area = 8.4 acres) in the
Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southeast corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Elm Avenue: APN: 0208-961-05, -06, -07.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00 p.m. Mike Smith February 19, 2008
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00438 - MICHAEL CHAI
— Proposals to modify the site layout of a previously approved development review application. The
proposal contemplates reducing the floor area of Building 5 by about 3,000 square feet and increasing
the floor area of Building 1B by about 3,000 square feet. Included are slight changes to the building
elevations. The overall master-planned retail and office complex is comprised of two 2-story office
buildings of 28,000 square feet (each), three single-story retail buildings of 17,500 square feet
(combined), and three single-story restaurant pad buildings of 17,000 square feet (combined) on three
parcels (combined area = 8.4 acres) in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at the southeast
corner of Foothill Boulevard and Elm Avenue: APN: 0208-961-05, -06, -07.
Background: This project was originally reviewed by the Design Review Committee on
January 16, 2007. As revisions were requested, the Committee continued the item to February 6, 2007.
At that follow-up meeting, the project was recommended for approval to the Planning Commission. The
project, along with an associated tentative parcel map, was reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission on March 28, 2007. Since then, the applicant has met with staff several times to discuss
changes to the project that staff indicated would require review and approval of the Committee.
Analysis: The proposed changes are for Buildings 1 B and 5. The applicant proposes a reduction in the
floor area of Building 5 by removing about 3,000 square feet from its east side, and to increase the floor
area of Building 1 B by adding about 3,000 square feet to its east side. The overall floor area of all the
buildings within this office/commercial complex will be unchanged as the revisions result in an "even"
exchange. The corresponding parking requirement is unchanged and the only difference in the parking
area would be having several of the parking stalls that were to be located immediately to the east of
Building 1 B relocated to the parking area immediately to the east of Building 5 (Exhibit A).
The revisions to the floor plans of both buildings result in minor revisions to their elevations. The
changes will be most apparent on the north and south elevations of both buildings. Because of the
increase in floor area for Building 1 B, the building will be extended eastward and two tower elements will
be added at the southeast and northeast corners. All of the previously proposed architectural features
such as the vertical screen panels, cornices, and horizontal trellises will be extended accordingly.
Although the use of glazing on the south elevation has been expanded as well, it is limited to the tower
elements on the north elevation facing Foothill Boulevard. This was considered acceptable previously as
the towers were closer together and the absence of glass on the wall plane between them was not as
apparent. However, as this wall plane has been lengthened, staff has indicated to the applicant's
architect that additional storefront glazing on the north elevation will be required so that it is not
dominated by bare plaster walls. There will be no change to the west elevation of Building 1 B and the
only apparent change on the east elevation will be the addition of the tower element at the southeast
corner (Exhibit B).
As Building 5 is reduced in floor area, the exterior will manifest itself in the elimination of several sections
between the end tower elements. There will be no change to the east or west elevations of Building 5
(Exhibit C).
DRC ACTION AGENDA
DRC2006-00438— MICHAEL CHAI
February 19, 2008
Page 2
Stone veneer has been deleted on the color renderings (Exhibit D) from the northwest corner and the
center tower element at the north elevation. Staff suspects that this is an error as the "black and white"
elevation show the veneer correctly. Nevertheless, the application of stone veneer should be as
previously approved by the Planning Commission.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
1. Provide additional glass along the north elevation of Building 1 B.
2. Incorporate stone veneer at all locations as previously approved by the Planning Commission.
3. The revised parking areas shall be designed according to all applicable City standards including
parking stall/aisle dimensions, striping, landscaping, and Fire Department access.
4. Relocated trash enclosures shall be placed as close as possible to the buildings.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval, with the above-noted correction, and forwarding
to the Planning Director for review and action.
Attachments
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Munoz, Stewart, Nicholson
Staff Planner: Mike Smith
The Committee accepted the revisions as submitted by the applicant with the condition that he
incorporates the changes discussed by staff, including the addition of more glazing and the consistent
use of decorative veneer on the north elevation of Building 1 B facing Foothill Boulevard.
O• .
YRW
MIND
pill
�11�C
_ � r
IF
� 1
`� �L'tlL'tlOMbYtl•YtliQ I�tE ��y, ' f
'3'
rr+.u. .reeonra YOMOIn]II]agNW � � �•
rron•ere vaxre
33111111103 M31A3!! IS3 c s a
3l1tlf10S 39tlI183H
J®rnir"Flou----------- -------------;—rn
A •,ae aagdat
m
0
m
z
0
A J
L` m
0� 0
� � a
o
0
Q W
0 0
� o
� o a
n
P m °
i n
NJ
A S ❑n
_i
�i
Om ❑ ❑ ❑
n ,
ry
`------------
EXHIBIT B
i
i
i
M NOIIVA313 81'9019 8OIH31X3
..I— � � N
nom em mxre
1001)A)1531
a 33111WW00 M31A3H N91S30
a 3HYf10S 39tllIH3N e n a
yI
o
I I
o
I
o
I
o0 0 4=
=a= 7
o
I oo
a W
S
F
7
.0 - a�
z
JI � JI 0 y
= F X
NI W
F Zu O
I I W
I I J >
W W
J
= W
F =
K f
rca ¢ z� O
N
z E(I
F W
to _
W• nl
rl
2
O
Q
w
W
S
H�
O
Z
W
z .AL1
v
'M13—M-11—.6•y Ai-n313 3x3-Z610•\M•Po\3SNZ6Z0\6ye\'l
NOIIVA313 84'0018 VO1!131X3
rnnanro+/oxoman�ax�xru 6 � � � 4 Q
300»nas3a MU-d 1MUM
N 33111WWO0 M31A3N 111S30
a 3NVf1OS 3OV11l13H
I
0
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
Z Z
0 0
a
I W W
w J
19, MEW
NMI
W
F f
y y
W
3 W
'T• 3
W W
2 2
e 4
I I j
0
I
w I
I
I
a
I
I
I
o I o
~ I a
a
W ya
J J
W W
F f
y
W i
I m
2
y y
W n W � T
V
wiz `
_v^
V
-3—1-153.x.6.v Bi-n313 1x3-L6L�•\lev pp\JSHL6[0\6pa\.3
rxwnr�tialanallo oxalru � � � � P
rww erll mur�
IAII)1)1131 5
� 33111WW00 M31A3lI N91930
�m 3HtlfI0S 3Jtl11N3N $ g P
rr
I{�----------L—},r---------I p
I III I
I ,
LO
II I O
II I z
C
II J
I '
I I �
I m
I ,
O V Q
I a J
p,
II �
II O
O
II J
II LL
G
II W
� CO
ui O
� O
N �
I �g
k � N
1 tY
I -
I
II 0 S
t II
I n
I'
II
I
I ■
I �
I
I n
I'
1
II
z ❑ N O
I �
I
I
II
❑ 0�
II I
_ I
I I
I I
II I
I
I
1 1
---------- I------ ------ML ------
EXHIBIT C u PS-N d-L6[0.\P.PoVSM6[0\�\R
rmamo mw ere mvvd
40015 K51SI4
111111 33111PIN03 IA3A38 NDIS313
3MYnDS 30VIIHM
Mod
LP
L4
mW
°o ryl Lr
P!
010
2 t
LL
2
LU
o
Lu
0
Z
0
X
O
>
L4
nl
7:2
0
z
z
"OW vonoenro'r du ox�ere
rroa.ere meve
na
33111MV103 MAN N91830 a
a 3tlVfiDS 39V11H3H
Blum
4
� o
'o
� = 2
a °
� F
a a
W W
J J
W Ye
H F
N y
W
3 w
f7 O
= rI =
N N
X k
"I W W
LU
j Mill 1]1111
C�
n..
4 p
CS
N b
= a =
° t
a a
J J
W W
F F
N y
W ( _
=
.11 ssr3-m®. (W 80 109-n313 uo-aeco.V•.cvbsezezo\^o^�n
N011YA313 91'0018!101831X3
�uas is;i 33111VIROO MMAN NDIS30
e .
3uvnoS 30Y1183H e s
ml S
w= V
e�
.n
,
z
o I V
� f
I I W
,r• � 1
a
3 -
W _
w�� I
Y
w 5
s,
I ,
- Jr
� a <
a w >
JIM
LLI
W W
'c�iVd s m
4 W$ W z
_ oNd ry z z
a
EXHIBIT D
SNOIIVA313 9'0019 WHIM
own•m v vd
$ '1'"1191 33111NN03 M31A3H N01S3O
3HVfIOS 30V11H3H € E
D 5'
e
r
4
r
s
W
J
W
Vl
W
3 a�
W
Z
N h�
i�
:I
�lV
G O O
cc
> yI7 W W
W "!
co
IZO �I�I �l
U
0
p
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
February 19, 2008
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Corky Nicho on
Assistant Planning Director