HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/02/28 - Agenda Packet DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES
TUESDAY FEBRUARY 28, 1995 5:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Heinz Lumpp Larry McNiel Dan Coleman
Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker John Melcher
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such as plan
revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting.
NO CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS SUBMITTED
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant regarding their
development application. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the
Committee may open the meeting for public input.
5:00 p.m.
(Beverly) DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14139 NTEX - The design review of building
elevations and detailed site plan for Tract 14139 a residential subdivision of 119 single
family lots on 54 acres of land in the Low Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units
per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Ave. and 25th Street - APN
225-082-01 (Continued from February 14, 1995).
5:40 p.m.
(Dan) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-03
NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP - A request to construct single
family residences on 12 infill lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per
acre) within the Northtown area along 24th Street, 25th Street, and Humboldt Avenue, east
of Hermosa Avenue. - APN: 209-102-19, 31; 209-104-16, 18; 209-111-04, 15, 16;
209-112-26; 209-123-25. Related File: Pre-Application Review 94-05 (Continued from
February 14, 1995).
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee
from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony
and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
ADJOURNMENT
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:00 p.m. Beverly Luttrell February 28, 1995
DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 14139 - CENTEX - The design review of building elevations and detailed
site plan for Tract 14139 a residential subdivision of 119 single family lots on 54 acres of land in the Low
Density Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Ave.
and 25th Street- APN : 225-082-01 (Continued from February 14, 1995).
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Lary McNiel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Beverly.Luttrell
The Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Coleman) approved the revisions to the project with the
changes noted in the applicants letter of February 23, 1995 and with the following noted changes:
1. All porches are 8 feet in total depth, with an inside dimension (post to building wall) of 6-6".
2. Ten total footprints are provided with 4 plans and three elevations per plan.
3. The rear elevation of the Plan 2(Monterey) should have a potshelf at the primary window with a corbel
detail supporting it.
4. On the Plan 3 rear elevation, a gable roof should be used with shutters and no pop-out.
5. All columns and wall entry features shall be of ashlar cut stone to be consistent with the requirements
of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood Theme).
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:40 p.m. Dan Coleman February 28, 1995
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-03 -NORTHTOWN HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT CORP. - A request to construct single family residences on 12 infill lots in the Low
Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre)within the Northtown area along 24th Street, 25th Street, and
Humboldt Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue. - APN: 209-102-19, 31; 209-104-16, 18; 209-111-04, 15, 16;
209-112-26;209-123-25.Related File: Pre-Application Review 94-05 (Continued from February 14, 1995).
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Dan Coleman
1. The alternative with the all stucco scheme was not recommended for approval.
2. The fencing plan, as presented by the architect, was recommended for approval.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Buller
Secretary