Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012/12/19 - Agenda Packet - Agenda
city of OCAMONG. 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909)477.2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 18t and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 P.M. DECEMBER 19, 2012 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers........................... 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Marc Steinorth Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison �. CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman • . CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds 'Y y '�v l � INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC � J _Q,APVTIO(.LAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate,a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board,Authority Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation,you would like to display audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items(with the exception of public hearing items)will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any remaining "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" Item or on an "Administrative Hearing Item(s)," your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS-Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter,the City's Public Library(-ies)and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST-Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on- demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth(DSUCable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire District Board and the Public Financing Authority Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2012 A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) i C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM S D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP, THE FIRE SUPPORT MANAGEMENT GROUP, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 2274, THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL, THE GENERAL LABOR GROUP AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES—FIRE, CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B)— NUMBER OF CASES: 1 - CITY E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .9.A'WhOe:�CAMONGA DECEMBER 19, 2012 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER — 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of Sheriff Rod Hoops for his service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. H2. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Carol Anne Gardner, the 2012 recipient of the Upland Foothill Kiwanis Club's Outstanding Senior Citizen of the Year award. H3. Update on City's New Household Hazardous Waste Facility. H4. Presentation of information regarding Freedom Courtyard Dedication scheduled for January 12, 2013. H5. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Etiwanda High School Band for winning First Place at the 75th Annual Southern California Schools Band and Orchestra Association Championships in the 6A Division. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA '.NFfi,6CArOWA DECEMBER 19, 2012 The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: December 5, 2012 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated November 28, 2012 through December 11, 2012 for the 1 total of$1,349,888.18. J3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2012. 14 J4. Authorization to award the purchase of two (2) Type I Engines, as budgeted, for the Fire 19 Protection District, from KME Kovatch, in the amount of $1,062,381.00, per RFP #12/13- 101, from Fund 3288501-5604(Capital Outlay-Vehicles). J5. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities 21 District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-5 and ordering the annexation of such property located on the west side of East Ave., south of Lima Dr. to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (LVD Rancho Cucamonga LLC, Owner—APN: 0227-012-24). RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-053 22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO.12-5 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J6. Approval to adopt an annexation map showing Assessor Parcel Number 1100-131-01 26 (Lennar Homes of California), located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Miller Ave. proposed to be annexed into CFD 85-1. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _aANVfi06CAM0NGA DECEMBER 19, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-054 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 12-7) SHOWING PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J7. Approval to adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 30 12-7 (APN: 1100-131-01, Lennar Homes of California, Owner), located on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Miller Ave. into Community Facilities District No. 85-1, specifying services proposed to be financed, to set and specify the special taxes proposed to be levied within the annexation territory and set a time and place for a public hearing related to the annexation. RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-055 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 12-7) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J8. Approval to award a five (5) year lease purchase agreement to Xerox Corporation in the 42 amount not to exceed $450,000 for the Lease Purchase and Installation of one (1) Lot of Multi-Function Copiers; award a five (5) year service and supplies contract, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, to Xerox Financial Services, with annual costs of $60,000, in accordance with Request For Bid #12/13-001; and authorize staff to allocate related Fiscal Year 2012-13 Expenditures from Applicable City and Fire District Account Numbers in accordance with the approved Fiscal Year 2013-13 Budget. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY K1. Approval of Minutes: December 5, 2012 (Regular Meeting) L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: December 5, 2012 (Regular Meeting) December 5, 2012 (Special Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated November 28, 2012 through December 11, 2012 and 44 payroll ending December 11, 2012 for the total of$5,710,557.76. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of November 30, 2012. 79 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA aCAMONCA DECEMBER 19, 2012 L4. Consideration of adopting updated Conflict of Interest code. 91 RESOLUTION NO. 12-189 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHICH INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PREPARED BY THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 80-49(J) L5. Approval to accept grant revenue in the amount of $47,348.00 awarded by the California 106 Emergency Management Agency (FY2012 Emergency Management Performance Grant), and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga into Account 1380000-4740 (Grant Income)for the purpose of Emergency Management planning activities. L6. Accept the Freedom Courtyard Project, Contract No. 12-061 as complete, release the 107 bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of$226,096.64. RESOLUTION NO. 12-191 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FREEDOM COURTYARD PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 12-061 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L7. Reappointment of William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, as representative of 110 the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control (WVMVC) District Board of Trustees. L8. Approval to award a five (5) year capital lease with annual payments of $65,400, to Dell 111 Financial Services for a re-order of Dell Blade Server hardware, software, and maintenance from Sigmanet, Inc., piggybacking off of RFP#11/12-108 awarded in March 2012, to be funded from account 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay-Computer Equipment). L9. Approve a Contract Amendment(CO. 89-136) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., 113 of Irwindale, California, and the use of budgeted existing funds in the amount of $66,000 from Fund 1001316-5300 (Street and Park Maintenance) for the Landscape and Restroom Maintenance of the Foothill Boulevard Trailhead for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. L10. Approval of Plans and Specifications for the LMD-4R and Garcia Park Lighting Retrofit 114 Project and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the"Notice Inviting Bids" to be funded from Account Numbers 1134303-5650/1716134-0 (LMD 4R) and 1139303-5300/0-6963 (LMD 9). FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND g CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .!1faPF110 C,>'CAMONCn DECEMBER 19, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 12-192 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS L11. Approve a contract amendment (CO. 09-203) with JDC, Inc, of Rancho Cucamonga, California and the use of existing budgeted funds in the total amount of $55,000 to be 119 funded from 1001316-5300 ($14,600), 1025001-5300 ($9,400) and 1134303-5300 ($31,000)for Concrete Repair and Replacement Projects located in Lions Park, Day Creek Park and West Greenway Park for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. L12. Approval to award a five (5) year lease purchase agreement to Xerox Corporation in the 120 Amount not to exceed $450,000 for the Lease Purchase and Installation of one (1) Lot of Multi-Function Copiers; award a five (5) year service and supplies contract, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, to Xerox Financial Services, with annual costs of $60,000, in accordance with Request For Bid #12/13-001; and authorize staff to allocate related Fiscal Year 2012-13 Expenditures from Applicable City and Fire District Account Numbers in accordance with the approved Fiscal Year 2013-13 Budget. L13. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directing 122 staff to use the California Air Resource Board Allowance Revenue solely to benefit its retail electricity customers. RESOLUTION NO. 12-193 123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING STAFF TO USE THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCE BOARD ALLOWANCE REVENUE SOLELY TO BENEFIT ITS RETAIL ELECTRICITY CUSTOMERS L14. Summary Vacation (V-220) of the Blanket Drainage Easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 125 of Tract Map 16776, generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place—APN 227-693-56, 57, 58 and 59; related file DRC2012-00740. RESOLUTION NO. 12-194 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE BLANKET DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 56, 57, 58 AND 59 OF TRACT MAP 16776, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND FORESTER PLACE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, r PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA _! A&0 loo"C;AMONOA DECEMBER 19, 2012 L15. Approval of a Reimbursement Agreement (URA-31) for the undergrounding of existing 131 overhead utilities in conjunction with the development of Tract 18806, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, and approval to appropriate $37,807.50 from the Underground Utilities fund balance to Account No. 1129303-5650/1026129-0. RESOLUTION NO. 12-195 134 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (URA-31) FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE L16. Approval to receive and file Animal Center statistics for the month of October 2012, 135 November 2012 and year to date January 2012- November 2012. IF- M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. M1. Second reading to adopt Ordinance No. 857 authorizing the City Council to adopt a 139 Complete Streets Program. ORDINANCE NO. 857 (SECOND READING) 140 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. Adoption of a Resolution making determinations regarding the proposed annexation of 146 territory(Joe Munoz, Owner-APN 1077-401-19 - Annexation No. 12-6) located on Center Ave. between Foothill Blvd. and Church St. to an existing Community Facilities District, calling a special election and authorizing submittal of levy of special taxes to the qualified electors. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 8 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA .A1*'fiC1&CAM0NGA DECEMBER 19, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-056 149 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 12-6) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY O. JOINT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01.a. Proposed Fee Amendments for Fire District. 157 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-057 160 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING, REVISING, AND UPDATING VARIOUS FEES AND REVISING RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015, RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-026, AND RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-040. b. Proposed Fee Amendments for City Clerk and Community Development. 175 RESOLUTION NO. 12-196 182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 06-032 AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS 04-293, 06-283 AND 12-101. P. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ..9A' iO6C,ONGA DECEMBER 19, 2012 P1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056 AND ADDENDUM TO THE 213 GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplemental update to the Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) to amend Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures), Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses and Development Standards), Article IV (Site Development Provisions) and Article V (Specific Use Requirements) of Title 17 (Development Code) as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR). ORDINANCE NO. 858 (FIRST READING) 244 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056, A SUPPLEMENTARY UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. P2. TRAIL ABANDONMENT - DRC2009-00848 -A request to abandon two portions of a Local 268 Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 & 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side of 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021- 02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. THIS PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO STATE CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15305 (CLASS 5 EXEMPTION - MINOR ALTERATIONS IN LAND USE LIMITATIONS). RESOLUTION NO. 12-197 287 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848, A REQUEST TO A REQUEST TO ABANDON TWO PORTIONS OF A LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL THAT LEADS FROM THE TRAIL BETWEEN RESIDENCES ONTO RANCH GATE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE TWO PORTIONS OF TRAIL ARE BETWEEN 5272 AND 5278 RANCH GATE ROAD AND ONE COMPLETELY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5340 RANCH GATE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF - APN: 1061-021- 02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. Q. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY/FIRE The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. Q1.a. Approval of various actions related to the purchase of Accela Automation for Land 290 Management Services. b. Authorize the appropriation from Fire Protection Capital Fund Reserves in the Amount of 296 $928,700 into Account Number 3288501-9714 (Transfer Out-Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund) to prefund the Fire District's share of the Accela Automation project. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2012 Q2. 2012 Cucamonga Canyon Report. 297 Q3. Overview of upcoming LMD 2 Public Engagement Effort. (Oral Report) --- R. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. R1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council "' Member.) R2. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S 301 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY&ARTS FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS. S. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING T. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 13, 2012, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. December 5, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION AND REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam S a nolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development and Council Member-Elect Marc Steinorth. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) The following closed session items are being considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7195 ACORN PLACE AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-49; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, KENNETH FLING, ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND WALTER STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, ROZANA AKA ROXANDA AND JUAN RIVERA AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING APPROVAL OF APPRAISAL BY JOYCE L. RIGGS, MAI, SRNVA AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT.— CITY D2. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-50; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, KENNETH FLING, ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND WALTER STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, SATINDERIJIT S. AND SIMRIT BHATTI AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING APPROVAL OF APPRAISAL BY JOYCE L. RIGGS, MAI, SR/WA AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT. — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-51; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, KENNETH FLING, ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND WALTER STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- AND PROPERTY OWNERS, JOSE H. AND DEBRA R. GAMERO AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING APPROVAL OF APPRAISAL BY JOYCE L. RIGGS, MAI, SRNVA AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT. — CITY * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings— December 5, 2012 - Page 1 of 9 D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-52; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, KENNETH FUNG, ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND WALTER STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, SFR 2010-REO CORPORATION AND ITS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING APPROVAL OF APPRAISAL BY JOYCE L. RIGGS, MAI, SR/WA AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT. — CITY D5. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE, IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-53; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, KENNETH FUNG, ASSISTANT ENGINEER AND WALTER STICKNEY, ASSOCIATE ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, CARLOS A. LANDINO AND HIS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING APPROVAL OF APPRAISAL BY JOYCE L. RIGGS, MAI, SRNVA AND INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE OF REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT. — CITY D6. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP, THE FIRE SUPPORT MANAGEMENT GROUP AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 2274-FIRE D7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(8)—FIRE D8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL: INITIATION OF LITIGATION, ONE CASE PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SUBSECTION 54956.9 (C )— CITY D9. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: NETTIE NIELSEN, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;, AND BOBBY BRETT, RANCHO BASEBALL, LLC) REGARDING LEASE TERMS - CITY C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No persons were present wishing to speak. D. RECESS The closed session recessed at 5:50 p.m. to the special meeting. G. SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012 - Page 2 of 9 The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council held a special meeting on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 in the City Council Chambers at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:10 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Director; Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Janice Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. Council Member-Elect Marc Steinorth was also present. G3. Approval of a Resolution certifying Municipal Election results. Resolution No. 12-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 6, 2012, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF LAW MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 12-182. Motion carried 4-0-1 (Council Member Buquet was absent). H. ITEMS OF BUSINESS WITH NEWLY ELECTED OFFICIALS H1. Oaths of Office will be administered by Honorable Jeffrey King, Associate Justice, to the following: • Sam Spagnolo, Council Member • Marc Steinorth, Council Member • Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • James C. Frost, City Treasurer Justice Jeffrey King administered the oaths of office to the newly elected officials. I. RECESS FOLLOWING RECESS, A RECEPTION WILL OCCUR IN THE FOYER OF THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS TO CONGRATULATE THE ELECTED OFFICIALS. THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. The special meeting adjourned at 6:19 p.m. J. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012- Page 3 of 9 The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Vice President/Vice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Director; Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director; Mike Bell, Fire Chief; Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director; Jim Frost, City Treasurer; Janice Reynolds, City Clerk; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. K. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS K1. Presentation of Omnitrans Go Smart College Student Free Ride Pilot Program Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst introduced Wendy Williams, Director of Marketing for Omnitrans, who updated the City Council and the audience on the Omnitrans Go Smart College Student Free Ride Pilot Program. K2. Announcement of Spark of Love Toy Drive Robert Goss, Spark of Love Toy Drive Coordinator, announced the Spark of Love Toy Drive. K3. Great Shakeout Exercise 2012 (Added at the Meeting) Breanna Medina, Management Analyst Il, updated the City Council and the audience on the 2012 Great Shakeout exercise. IF-- L. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS L1. Gwyn Frost congratulated the newly elected officials and presented a mug to Council Member Steinorth. L2. Jerie Lee congratulated the newly elected officials. She addressed LMD #2's Annual Newsletter, noting that it states that everything in the District is maintained at a Level B. However, Mrs. Lee stated that the level of service on Daycreek has not changed and is still in need of attention. Also, Mrs. Lee noted that the newsletter mentions the new community engagement process and questioned whether all of the property owners were notified of the three public meetings, public hearing and Proposition 218 election. If so, she pointed out that the City Council should honor and respect the vote that was taken. L3. Frank Annunziato congratulated the newly elected officials. He noted that the City Council's leadership will be needed to bring back California. L4. Victoria Jones, representing the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, invited the City Council and the audience to a caroling event on Saturday at the Route 66 Trailhead at 3:00p.m. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012 - Page 4 of 9 L5. John Lyons congratulated the newly elected officials. He noted that the Fire Department has done an excellent job on weed abatement and was pleased with the services that he had received from the Animal Care and Adoption Center. Mr. Lyons urged everyone to donate to the Spark of Love Toy Drive and reminded all of the listeners to shop and eat in Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, he noted that December 7th is the anniversary of the attack on Pearl Harbor. L6. Teresa Akahoshi and Tina Gilfry invited the City Council and the audience to a fundraiser for the Library Foundation. "A December to Remember" will be held on December 16, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. L7. Deloris Faheem congratulated the newly elected officials and urged the community to give to those in need. She noted an upcoming event on December 19, 2012 and indicated that the City Council has been invited to judge the event. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time out discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT M1. Approval of Minutes: November 21, 2012 (Regular Meeting) M2. Approval of Check Register dated November 14, 2012 through November 27, 2012 for the total amount of$111,821.70. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. N. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Approval of Minutes: November 21, 2012 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 5-0. O. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL 01. Approval of Minutes: November 21, 2012 (Regular Meeting) 02. Approval of Check Register dated November 14, 2012 through November 27, 2012 and payroll ending November 27, 2012 for the total amount of$4,121,778.93. 03. It is recommended that the City Council approve awarding a Contract (CO#12-151) to Greenplay, LLC, to perform a City-Wide Community Recreation needs assessment, in accordance with Request for Proposal No. 12/13-104, in the amount of $58,955, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $5,895 funded from Account Number 1001401-5300/5341000-1890. 04. Approval of map for Parcel Map 19043, located on the north side of Amber Lane west of Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Century Heritage Builders, Inc. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012- Page 5 of 9 RESOLUTION NO. 12-184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 19043 05. Accept improvements, release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2007-00247, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue, submitted by Transam Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 12-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2007-00247 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 06. Accept the Traffic Signals at three locations and signal interconnect system on Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard, Contract No. 11-073 as complete, release the Bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of$809,875.81. RESOLUTION NO. 12-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT THREE LOCATIONS AND SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD FROM HAVEN AVENUE TO DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 11-073, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 07. Adoption of a Resolution consenting to acquire right-of-way within the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Fontana and agreeing to hear Resolutions of Necessity associated with the Interstate 15 and Base Line Road Interchange Project. RESOLUTION NO. 12-187 A RESOLUTION OF CONSENT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ACQUIRE STREETS AND HIGHWAY RIGHTS-OF- WAY WITHIN THE CITIES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FONTANA AND AGREEMENT BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO HEAR RESOLUTIONS OF NECESSITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. P1. Encouraging Solar Photovoltaic Energy Generation in Rancho Cucamonga (Oral Report) Mark Berg, Building Inspector Supervisor and Alana Rivadeneyra, Energy Efficiency Coordinator, provided the staff report. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012 - Page 6 of 9 Q. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEMS Speaker cards may be submitted for all those who wish to speak on the following topic(s). The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals wishing to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council, not to members of the audience. Q1. Introduce Ordinance No. 857 authorizing the City Council to adopt a Complete Streets Program. ORDINANCE NO. 857(FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM Management Aide Mike Parmer presented the staff report. In response to Council Member Williams, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner addressed the makeup of the Trails Advisory Committee. She noted that the Committee is composed of two Commission Members, an equestrian representative, a bicyclist and an alternate. Council Member Williams suggested that Page #4 of Ordinance No. 857, Section 5.0. be changed to read, "The committee shall include representatives from the bicycling, youth and elderly community, and other advocacy organizations, as relevant". She noted that Section 5.b. contains the word, shall, and indicated the importance of including community representatives in the process. Mayor Michael inquired about increased funding opportunities. In response, Management Aide Parmer confirmed that cities with a Complete Streets Program can access more funding opportunities. Mayor Michael opened the administrative hearing. Victoria Jones, representing the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, spoke in support of Ordinance No. 857. She noted that this policy will help to increase physical activity and create a healthier community. Maelin Aquirno, a Healthy RC Youth Leader, supported Ordinance No. 857. Alberto Guerno, representing Community Champions, indicated that he supported this policy. John Lyons addressed two concerns that impede the full use of the Pacific Electric Trail: A gate at the southeast corner of the Pacific Electric Trail at Rochester and a section of trail with alternating widths at Rochester and Church. He also suggested that signage be installed next to the trail advertising various restaurants, etc. and a bicycle parking lot at Victoria Gardens. Michael Powers inquired about the funding source and wondered if the programs would be implemented in accordance with the community's wishes. In response, Mayor Michael noted that staff has been directed to actively pursue all funding opportunities and indicated that many grant programs do have restrictions on their usage. Mayor Michael closed the administrative hearing. The City Council members discussed whether or not to amend the Ordinance to include the word, shall. In response to the Council, Management Aide Mike Parmer noted that the word, shall, was used in Section 5.b. as community involvement in this process is very important. The word, may, * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012- Page 7 of 9 was used in Section 5.c.1. in order to provide some leeway in the event that all the categories of representatives couldn't be obtained. City Manager John Gillison pointed out the members of the community who are engaged in this program this evening and noted that community engagement will continue to be a critical part of this program in the future. The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager read the title. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to adopt Ordinance No. 857 for first reading and set second reading for December 19, 2012. Motion carried 5-0. R. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. R1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Steinorth noted that he has attended 25 trainings in 29 days and thanked staff for their assistance during this transition. R2. LEGISLATIVE AND REGIONAL UPDATES (Oral) Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo reported that the California Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of cities who had been overcharged by counties in the collection of property tax revenues. He noted that counties could be required to repay cities tens of millions of dollars Statewide. The Mayor Pro Tern noted that the League's Empire Division has developed legislative priorities related to the Realignment Bill. The Division has requested that the League's Statewide Board of Directors adopt these Realignment Priorities and advocate for these priority items on behalf of its member cities. Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo reported on the Federal budget sequestration, which potentially could negatively affect CDBG, the HOME Investment Partnership, COPS and the Byrne Justice Grants. He reported that the City is closely monitoring this issue. The Mayor Pro Tern congratulated our local representatives, noting that the City looks forward to working with them. S. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. T. RECESS The regular session recessed at 8:32 p.m. after a moment of silence for Patti Newcombe. U. RECONVENE CLOSED SESSION The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council reconvened the closed session on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 in the Serrano Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was reconvened at 8:40 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings—December 5, 2012 - Page 8 of 9 Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. V. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. X. ADJOURNMENT Mayor L. Dennis Michael adjourned the meeting at 9:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular and Special Meetings— December 5, 2012 - Page 9 of 9 (1) (.1) • MO al CV° a) 0 LL -C " v"i cp 00 . 0 o- - v n = co CD CU (,) C 4— ,., '- : . ',.. '', '‘, / /I c)... 1 ,1f7.. ., .... \\ , r ( ) r^ 'p. '., —. H { {.' L a--+ O O (/) > >. / 0 �� � :• U P P (13 CT3 :.•:y .. s.,, • ..\." • . .4, , c 0 D r O Ca f- Li- i •.A..ti-I -- _ . >N O O tf w r w �X 0 >" +— -o 0 _ O -o > ` '3 . . C (6 L CO N• " O N a) -c > r n ♦� co y U 0 1 ddb'# W a) V ,O1J N 0 0 0- a) E U Q U 4' ,: o °' > a� a I -0 II a) U .ir `TT W J S- \ -.---.-1 c>(-ki. ;:iii.__H'. '.A: L ,/ ,4„,0 ..4 . . 0) ci. c 1 . It, co 0 .... Cf) ,.. .*.v. t I I E I CO ..4.-0 4 f/ i C 1 CO ' 4-- I \ o &._ > :4= . . \.. . .., Tr,•,,g _c c . 1 C C lull + I 1 .• litil .. • .. . , . /) . . -, : ‘ C . , D =.._ ---, 2 u) (I) 0 . .. . • CD • • • .-.4k ., . 1.1,• I li,•!' ',, f. :'. • . el _ \ 1 • ..-. . =c • - . e;7 _1 04 W •■ • n, V 4- a$ . . � O O O LL ,T C) C E , D E = X 45 0 CD i= " E ° co " 2CO 4- O - O O O CO -0 D -- 0 ..0,, 4-, I o c c 0- co Ic ° a 0) o° § C +� L. CO •..., Q O O - �+ O N Q. c O 1 ■I.= X 120 "4=a3 L_>N 0.) .C73 a) WI pp (13 CL •- N C) O D -O ° C� .� o N 0 c 0, 2 Ca CD 4-1 O D U ._ — U = u .E > 2 4) O (I) -0 0 L CU co c vim. 22 EI ci, -=° E o D o - 5 4-4' 4••1 73 ° C o 0_ ° I E CO < A 00 O = .- e .::-.7 .o . . i, . 'JIB: El -In II • .0 .'L3:1;wt.'11;.1 u .," .., j.... El I% ir• U MIMI 0 c:C 9 E 1/43 La.1 -• = cc E , o 0 >11Z j st:: 'Z `22- ...,,,v i eu 1/2 I I" 7-........7- 11.1!11:7:7- 1— all ...:„,,,, ......4 ,..... o , ›,„„,, 4.,,, 0 • // 1 ------"... ... ..•.--",,..--•.....-- V '. .. ' .4,-,, DI — • › • ..---- ............. ........ - . fil - ...• 0 Imm r■ = r`l ' ? f"4 0 +.; an ' IT ci. ct IF: 1 1 = fr:, , Z MMi ..., . if- fin 4 kill r`.., 1"... Tr = ON CIO IIi , 1 1 I ' ' 1 f ( i j ilk '•• 111 = c" 0 rd 0 i S,. 'flr )1 ......, N., LI. "fill" virli br •- _ . ../. ., ,:, i. 1.1 . ., _ 0 4-.= .._..., =, 0,4400 , 9 r‘, , y -. .. - _ • >1' ; w cd, I 'a. 4741 if 4 1 4,_ 'Or { LANI `Or \ \ \‘' 4 vl \ %OH ' 4i* ' ' ', Z `1 I.■ ,4:Z a II J 2 ' I' < \ •,s,-. 44c it. I lier '.). lsa0PlW 141V,IIIM diussauuod 01 sl.V 041 101 l00waw0pu3 louolloN Ow 10 wol80.d•Si Poos Pig ooi 6£L16 VD of3uowo,nD oSun?I onlaa.agree Io.�n31nD yowl • 0£[16 VD oeuowmnD ofuod anuanV rr'r xv 89cL U uol�npun✓o� F�'IcIvAc1� ell fici pa,wsuodC•J U V 1 V pnaa.0.1 /sn'D 0h1-.0 n 91 LOS � LOOS 'xJ� 0116-LLIi (606) 9.ac6 s O.ul swap pun sn won avow pun sawn6 •sn.0 • s OL or uo uolssnoslp f>.I.n4a49 • stud}uaII3 . suosse1 °DunV 50661 • "IS uoilfsP :o661 • • InsbSuv*S.JO rims ya°Q 1 .100 f,9s;n 1.0a0. ail. Ligi s naa6z I o*c ;I 011/4 -Jo pna.l.fi}lunww. 6uol 9}uow ail}sul6a9 sw 1 . . . • 1 ./!s. .Ina . ®fri 11C�S .1 0 1,1 av3e1 ...,�..•....« .... • JI9 m 1 1.... 8.1.11V NSI L 110.1 .I.M NINMOQNN '1 V N 0 1.L tl N L cIo , u7fl f ear, ei 1 , ,, , epti.ljoID.I> 0!E__ IP-A 35 d�1 X): l 1 S3DIAM ) ti i L.... RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Pi Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331431 2012/12/06( AIRGAS USA LLC 20.08 AP 00331431 2012/12/06( AIRGAS USA LLC 160.87 AP 00331431 2012/12/06( AIRGAS USA LLC 40.87 AP 00331431 2012/12/06( AIRGAS USA LLC 118.22 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 546.29 AP 00331435 2012/12/06( EMCOR SERVICE 259.00 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,818.38 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,903.69 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 4,561.69 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 285.00 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 285.00 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 9,000.00 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,526.53 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 679.30 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 742.94 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,424.85 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 961.62 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 4,561.69 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,903.69 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,818.38 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,526.53 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 556.55 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 274.12 AP 00331445 2012/12/06( LN CURTIS AND SONS 61.65 AP 00331445 2012/12/06( LN CURTIS AND SONS 257.95 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 46.93 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.16 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 61.80 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 33.26 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 54.97 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 64.03 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 43.27 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.49 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.46 AP 00330666 2012/11/29( ABDELGAINY,ABDALLA 634.80 AP 00330667 2012/11/29( ABOHEBEISH,EMAN 477.28 AP 00330668 2012/11/29( ABOHEBEISH,HANAN 477.21 AP 00330669 2012/11/29( AERIA,ZACHARY R 481.64 AP 00330670 2012/11/29( AGENA,RYAN H 635.43 AP 00330671 2012/11/29( AGGAZZOTTI TRUST 636.25 AP 00330672 2012/11/29( ALLISON,JANE M 476.69 AP 00330673 2012/11/29( ALTA INTERNATIONAL LLC 4,131.23 AP 00330674 2012/11/29( ALVAREZ,MORELOS 155.42 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P2 Aizenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330675 2012/11/29( AMENDE-GRAHAM,CONSTANCE TR 119.38 AP 00330676 2012/11/29( ANDERSON,KENNETH A 477.16 AP 00330677 2012/11/29( APOSTOLOV,IZABELA 476.59 AP 00330678 2012/11/29( ARENCIBIA,JULIO A 634.78 AP 00330679 2012/11/29( ARNESTAD,JAMES P 623.01 AP 00330680 2012/11/29( AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC 116.57 AP 00330681 2012/11/29( AVA PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC 655.38 AP 00330682 2012/11/29( AZZAWI,MAZIN 233.62 AP 00330683 2012/11/29( BAILEY,LLOYD N JR 634.79 AP 00330684 2012/11/29( BAK, SOUNG HYUN 479.12 AP 00330685 2012/11/29( BAKER,DONALD R 634.78 AP 00330686 2012/11/29( BANK FAMILY TRUST 479.70 AP 00330687 2012/11/29( BANKS,VALADDE D 635.44 AP 00330688 2012/11/29( BAQUIRAN,MARLITO P 477.07 AP 00330689 2012/11/29( BEATY,LORNE J 634.77 AP 00330690 2012/11/29( BELENIUC,VAL 116.57 AP 00330691 2012/11/29( BELLFLOWER INVESTMENT FUND LLC 570.75 AP 00330692 2012/11/29( BENAVIDES,LEONARDO 635.43 AP 00330693 2012/11/29( BENNETT,JOHN 635.84 AP 00330694 2012/11/29( BERA,MAGAN R 634.48 AP 00330695 2012/11/29( BERTRAM FAM REVOC LIV 634.75 AP 00330696 2012/11/29( BISMARK,MICHAEL 311.69 AP 00330697 2012/11/29( BLACK,LA THEIA C 476.57 AP 00330698 2012/11/29( BLOOMFIELD,LYLA R LIVING TRUST 476.76 AP 00330699 2012/11/29( BOGNER, SPENCER CHARLES 116.57 AP 00330700 2012/11/29( BORTELS,DAVID R 476.96 AP 00330701 2012/11/29( BOWMAN,MELANIE M TR OF 2007 476.64 AP 00330702 2012/11/29( BRADSHAW,YUNG-HUI 635.31 AP 00330703 2012/11/29( BROWN,ADAM SCOTT 470.64 AP 00330704 2012/11/29( BROWN,LANCE&LAURA LIVING TRUST 2,905.82 AP 00330705 2012/11/29( BROWN,LAURI 476.57 AP 00330706 2012/11/29( BRYANT,HERBERT JR 634.93 AP 00330707 2012/11/29( BULLINGTON,CYNTHIA G 635.09 AP 00330708 2012/11/29( BUN,HANK TAI 631.98 AP 00330709 2012/11/29( BURNS,SCOTT 635.69 AP 00330710 2012/11/29( C Y HERITAGE INN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1] 280.99 AP 00330711 2012/11/29( CALLAHAN,ELIZABETH Y 478.27 AP 00330712 2012/11/29( CAMPOS,HECTOR 476.94 AP 00330713 2012/11/29( CARDENAS FAMILY TRUST 476.73 AP 00330714 2012/11/29( CARDENAS,ANGEL 116.42 AP 00330715 2012/11/29( CAREY,REGINALD 391.30 AP 00330716 2012/11/29( CARMEL APARTMENTS LLC 43,435.49 AP 00330717 2012/11/29( CATAQUIS,DENISE C 155.43 AP 00330718 2012/11/29( CHADWICK,CAROL L 476.92 AP 00330719 2012/11/29( CHANG,JULIE 476.69 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P3 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330720 2012/11/29( CHAPMAN FAMILY DECLARATION OF TR 313.07 AP 00330721 2012/11/29( CHEN,PETER 476.69 AP 00330722 2012/11/29( CHEN,RAYMOND 116.81 AP 00330723 2012/11/29( CHEW,KIA B 476.56 AP 00330724 2012/11/29( CHHABRA,GURBIR 477.94 AP 00330725 2012/11/29( CHOI,JAMIE L 476.61 AP 00330726 2012/11/29( CHOI,JOANNE WAI YEE 116.53 AP 00330727 2012/11/29( CHOW,CHUN MAN 467.97 AP 00330728 2012/11/29( CLARK,JULIAN C 634.78 AP 00330729 2012/11/29( COBOS,SANDRA 353.21 AP 00330730 2012/11/29( CRA INVESTMENTS LLC 22.21 AP 00330731 2012/11/29( CRAWLEY,JOHN A 476.57 AP 00330732 2012/11/29( CROOK, STEPHANIE M 477.07 AP 00330733 2012/11/29( CSD INVESTMENT LLC 135.55 AP 00330734 2012/11/29( CUERPO,MORTON E 634.83 AP 00330735 2012/11/29( DAILO,JUN P 634.78 AP 00330736 2012/11/29( DAULATZAI,JAMILA 954.81 AP 00330737 2012/11/29( DAY CREEK VILLAGE LLC 50.97 AP 00330738 2012/11/29( DEARDORFF, SCOTT L 476.57 AP 00330739 2012/11/29( DELPH,PATRICIA N B LIV TR 477.16 AP 00330740 2012/11/29( DESPALO,ESTER T 311.50 AP 00330741 2012/11/29( DICKERSON,CAROL YVETTE 233.96 AP 00330742 2012/11/29( DOMOND,TIERRY 58.07 AP 00330743 2012/11/29( DONARUMMO,JOHN JR. 476.91 AP 00330744 2012/11/29( DOUGLAS,RANDY 635.44 AP 00330745 2012/11/29( DUTTON,RYAN P 116.62 AP 00330746 2012/11/29( EBERSBACH,JOSEPH A 476.57 AP 00330747 2012/11/29( EKSTRAND,MARTHA SEPARATE PROPERTY T 479.53 AP 00330748 2012/11/29( ELGAMAL,AMGAD A 311.59 AP 00330749 2012/11/29( ELIGAN,JASMINE M 634.87 AP 00330750 2012/11/29( ENRIQUEZ,RICHARD&CAROLYN FAM TR 1 476.94 AP 00330751 2012/11/29( EONGRACIA LLC 174.79 AP 00330752 2012/11/29( EVANS,BRIAN A 476.57 AP 00330753 2012/11/29( FARLOW,BLAINE G 476.69 AP 00330754 2012/11/29( FAROOQ,MOHAMMAD 633.60 AP 00330755 2012/11/29( FC VICTORIA GARDENS-C INC 89.89 AP 00330756 2012/11/29( FELTON FAMILY TR 476.24 AP 00330757 2012/11/29( FIAONI,CLAUDIO 116.53 AP 00330758 2012/11/29( FLORES,HENRY 623.54 AP 00330759 2012/11/29( FLORES,MICHAEL R 311.59 AP 00330760 2012/11/29( FONTANILLA,GREGORIO M 634.17 AP 00330761 2012/11/29( FOOTCHESTER PARTNERS I LLC 1,782.47 AP 00330762 2012/11/29( FOOTHILL CROSSING LLC 8,557.34 AP 00330763 2012/11/29( FOOTHILL HAVEN 7,859.14 AP 00330764 2012/11/29( FOWLER,DEANNA S 476.69 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P4 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330765 2012/11/29( FOYE,DANIEL J 476.57 AP 00330766 2012/11/29( FREELAND,CHRIS&AMY LIVING TR 476.69 AP 00330767 2012/11/29( FREGOSO,ADRIANA 109.70 AP 00330768 2012/11/29( FREGOSO,ADRIANA 69.69 AP 00330769 2012/11/29( FUNG, SIUCHUNG 634.82 AP 00330770 2012/11/29( GALLARDO,ADRIANA F SEPARATE PROPERTY' 126.20 AP 00330771 2012/11/29 l GARRETT,CHARLES 636.36 AP 00330772 2012/11/29( GAUHAR, SHAHANZ 58.84 AP 00330773 2012/11/29( GILHAM,MICHAEL D 476.69 AP 00330774 2012/11/29( GOMEZ-TURRENTINE,REAGAN 476.69 AP 00330775 2012/11/29( GOODWIN,GREG L 634.76 AP 00330776 2012/11/29( GORAYA,RUBY 476.57 AP 00330777 2012/11/29( GREGORY,JILL M 476.59 AP 00330778 2012/11/29( GROSS,DANIEL J 634.79 AP 00330779 2012/111/29( GRUBSTEIN,ALAN 477.26 AP 00330780 2012/11/29( GU,HE 634.51 AP 00330781 2012/11/29( GUERRERO,EMMANUEL T B 634.75 AP 00330782 2012/11/29( GULTOM,WILLMAR 635.34 AP 00330783 2012/11/29( GUPTA,MADHUSUDHAN T 476.56 AP 00330784 2012/11/29( GURZ,MURAT 311.95 AP 00330785 2012/11/29( GVD COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES INC 208.59 AP 00330786 2012/11/29( HALL,JACK 1,734.83 AP 00330787 2012/11/29( HALL,JACK 626.17 AP 00330788 2012/11/29( HANKINS,WAYNE R REVOCABLE TRUST 477.07 AP 00330789 2012/11/29( HART,CYNTHIA 1 352.94 AP 00330790 2012/11/29( HASH,MICHAEL 476.90 AP 00330791 2012/11/29( HAVEN POINTE 1,350.30 AP 00330792 2012/11/29( HEREDIA,AGAPITO B JR 633.38 AP 00330793 2012/11/29( HERITAGE INN OF OWENSBORO INC 2,976.87 AP 00330794 2012/11/29( HODGSON,TRACIE A 476.57 AP 00330795 2012/11/29( HOFER PROPERTIES,LLC 22,266.66 AP 00330796 2012/11/29( HOMESCAPE CUCAMONGA LLC 635.08 AP 00330797 2012/11/29( HONG, SUK DAE 476.64 AP 00330798 2012/11/29( HONG,YOO RA 234.19 AP 00330799 2012/11/29( HORI,BRYAN D 476.57 AP 00330800 2012/11/29( HOU FAMILY TRUST 635.04 AP 00330801 2012/11/29( HSIAO,PO WUN 635.27 AP 00330802 2012/11/29( HSU,BRIEN 1,855.49 AP 00330803 2012/11/29( HUANG,TIAN Q 57.65 AP 00330804 2012/11/29( HWANG,MAN YONG 311.61 AP 00330805 2012/11/29( IBRAHIM,KHAOLA 474.66 AP 00330806 2012/11/29( INLAND MEDICAL BUILDING PROPERTIES LLC 7.29 AP 00330807 2012/11/29( INLAND MEDICAL BUILDING PROPERTIES LLC 78.08 AP 00330808 2012/11/29( ITUAH,MARK 476.56 AP 00330809 2012/11/29( J C INTER VIVOS TRUST 116.63 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P5 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330810 2012/11/29( JACKSON,MARY LOU LIV TR 476.52 AP 00330811 2012/11/29( JANSEN,ROBERT J 233.62 AP 00330812 2012/11/29( JANTAPIRAK,ALAI 476.86 AP 00330813 2012/11/29( JARAMILLO,ANTONIO R 476.69 AP 00330814 2012/11/29( JENKINS,DAVID R 476.28 AP 00330815 2012/11/29( JJSK LLC 246.82 AP 00330816 2012/11/29( JORDAN,WILLIAM M 476.83 AP 00330817 2012/11/29( JOSHI,PRAVIN 634.64 AP 00330818 2012/11/29( KABIR,HOMAYUN 635.33 AP 00330819 2012/11/29( KALIMANOV,ANDRE A 352.89 AP 00330820 2012/11/29( KALOOGIAN,HOWARD 477.07 AP 00330821 2012/11/29( KAMOTTO,TIMOTHY W 634.50 AP 00330822 2012/11/29( KAO,KATIE M 476.72 AP 00330823 2012/11/29( KARUBIAN,RALPH TRUST 8,609.10 AP 00330824 2012/11/29( KAUSHAL FAMILY TRUST 476.57 AP 00330825 2012/11/29( KENDRENA,KENNETH M 634.87 AP 00330826 2012/11/29( KIBBY,MICHAEL S 635.69 AP 00330827 2012/11/29( KIM,AE RAN 24.05 AP 00330828 2012/11/29( KIM,DONG WOO 235.76 AP 00330829 2012/11/29( KIM, SUNG SHIM 233.69 AP 00330830 2012/11/29( KINGSBURY,WARREN C 477.07 AP 00330831 2012/11/29( KNUDSEN,LESLIE M 116.60 AP 00330832 2012/11/29( KO,YOUNG SOO 233.76 AP 00330833 2012/11/29( KONGMEBHOL FAMILY TRUST 635.37 AP 00330834 2012/11/29( KRC INVESTMENTS 165.52 AP 00330835 2012/11/29( KROLAK,EDWARD C 476.69 AP 00330836 2012/11/29( KRONER,DANIEL J 476.76 AP 00330837 2012/11/29( KTR IE ONE LLC 6,190.47 AP 00330838 2012/11/29( KWAN FAMILY TRUST 392.14 AP 00330839 2012/11/29( LA,HAN 635.71 AP 00330840 2012/11/29( LABERNIK, SHANNON 476.69 AP 00330841 2012/11/29( LAM,SZEKIN 155.64 AP 00330842 2012/11/29( LANGFORD, SOPHIA C 156.37 AP 00330843 2012/11/29( LANSING,ROMEO L 635.44 AP 00330844 2012/11/29( LARA,GUSTAVO G 635.23 AP 00330845 2012/11/29( LAWSON,MARY A 476.81 AP 00330846 2012/11/29( LAWSON,RUSSELL D 233.62 AP 00330847 2012/11/29( LAWSON, STEVEN M 631.69 AP 00330848 2012/11/29( LDC TERRA VISTA VILLAGE LLC 411.65 AP 00330849 2012/11/29( LEE,EUN 476.84 AP 00330850 2012/11/29( LEE,GINA Y J 57.48 AP 00330851 2012/11/29( LEE, IN JEONG 477.07 AP 00330852 2012/11/29( LEE, SANGJUN 353.74 AP 00330853 2012/11/29( LEE,YI-YUN 476.57 AP 00330854 2012/11/29( LEE,YUSOON 476.37 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P6 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330855 2012/11/29( LEONEN,REGINA L 477.07 AP 00330856 2012/11/29( LI,BENSON 634.92 AP 00330857 2012/11/29( LI,JIA 635.11 AP 00330858 2012/11/29( LI,XIANG 156.21 AP 00330859 2012/11/29( LIFESTYLE DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC 92.06 AP 00330860 2012/11/29( LINK,THOMAS JOSEPH 634.73 AP 00330861 2012/11/29 l LIU,BING 233.57 AP 00330862 2012/11/29( LIU,HUAN-LIN 635.67 AP 00330863 2012/11/29( LIU,RONA DI 312.01 AP 00330864 2012/11/29( LIU,XIANGYUAN 634.95 AP 00330865 2012/11/29( LONGENERCKER,MARY D 202.35 AP 00330866 2012/11/29( LOPEZ, STEVEN 634.78 AP 00330867 2012/11/29( LOWEN,NANCY K 478.93 AP 00330868 2012/11/29( LU,YING FAMILY TRUST .635.34 AP 00330869 2012/11/29( LUNA,HENRY 311.95 AP 00330870 2012/11/29( MA,CHI KIT 634.31 AP 00330871 2012/11/29( MA,YONG 634.97 AP 00330872 2012/11/29( MABINI,VIRGEL 476.59 AP 00330873 2012/11/29( MACATULA,ELMER U 613.49 AP 00330874 2012/11/29( MACK,GORDON L III 635.31 AP 00330875 2012/11/29( MADRID,GILBERT A 475.88 AP 00330876 2012/11/29( MAGEE,GRAINNE 476.86 AP 00330877 2012/11/29( MARICIC,DIANE E 55.07 AP 00330878 2012/11/29( MARPAUNG, SAULINA 476.91 AP 00330879 2012/11/29( MARQUEZ,DAVID M 233.87 AP 00330880 2012/11/29( MARTINEZ,PAULA 476.56 AP 00330881 2012/11/29( MASSO,RAMSEY M 470.14 AP 00330882 2012/11/29( MASTER BUILDERS INC 6,661.19 AP 00330883 2012/11/29( MAZUR,BRADLEY J 635.44 AP 00330884 2012/11/29( MCGHEE,IRENE O 631.82 AP 00330885 2012/11/29( MDC RANCHO TWO LLC 1,096.74 AP 00330886 2012/11/29( MEDINA,PEDRO M 634.43 AP 00330887 2012/11/29( MEJIA,DAMIEN A 471.71 AP 00330888 2012/11/29( MILLER,AMY M 107.59 AP 00330889 2012/11/29( MOHAMMED,AMAN 634.47 AP 00330890 2012/11/29( MONTES DE OCA TR 476.60 AP 00330891 2012/11/29( MOON,KYENG DAI 311.73 AP 00330892 2012/11/29( MORENO REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 476.74 AP 00330893 2012/11/29( MOSLEY,THOMAS III 477.07 AP 00330894 2012/11/29( MU,PENGFEI 78.10 AP 00330895 2012/11/29( MUNAIM,AMIR I 635.36 AP 00330896 2012/11/29( MYERS,DAVID 19.79 AP 00330897 2012/11/29( MYRICK,EVAN E 293.82 AP 00330898 2012/11/29( MYRICK,KYLE 233.62 AP 00330899 2012/11/29( NANAN,ADESH 636.04 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P7 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330900 2012/11/29( NEGUS,MICHAEL V 476.77 AP 00330901 2012/11/29( NGUYEN,FRANK 632.77 AP 00330902 2012/11/29( NGUYEN,TAN THANH 311.58 AP 00330903 2012/11/29( NGUYEN,TUAN M 116.62 AP 00330904 2012/11/29( NORTHWOODS PARTNERS II LLC 97.30 AP 00330905 2012/11/29( NYE,KEVIN A 476.51 AP 00330906 2012/11/29( OLTMANS INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC 19,783.29 AP 00330907 2012/11/29( ORLANDO,PRINDA 155.58 AP 00330908 2012/11/29( PANG,TONY 116.79 AP 00330909 2012/11/29( PANJAITAN,EDISON 635.72 AP 00330910 2012/11/29( PAR R CUCAMONGA LP 350.06 AP 00330911 2012/11/29( PARK,KAREN 480.63 AP 00330912 2012/11/29( PARK,SUNG CHUL 474.42 AP 00330913 2012/11/29( PARMAR,DINESH 476.57 AP 00330914 2012/11/29( PASADENA WINTER GARDENS INC 272.72 AP 00330915 2012/11/29( PATEL,HARSHNA 635.35 AP 00330916 2012/11/29( PATEL,MAFATBHAI H 638.81 AP 00330917 2012/11/29( PATTERSON,BRIAN T 634.87 AP 00330918 2012/11/29( PEREA,TARA 476.70 AP 00330919 2012/11/29( PETERS,ASHISH S 635.24 AP 00330920 2012/11/29( PETERSON COMMERICAL PROP LLC 201.90 AP 00330921 2012/11/29( PETERSON,BARRYIMICHELLE LIV TR 476.57 AP 00330922 2012/11/29 l PEYGHAMBARI,AFSHIN 57.70 AP 00330923 2012/11/29( PFEIFFER,PAUL W 476.98 AP 00330924 2012/11/29( PHALEN,CASSANDRA L 476.62 AP 00330925 2012/11/29( PHAN,BAKY XUAN 635.45 AP 00330926 2012/11/29( PHANG, SOY CHONG 155.64 AP 00330927 2012/11/29( PIERCE,P MATTHEW LIVING TRUST 475.49 AP 00330928 2012/11/29( PLANTED IN FAITH RANCHO LLC 61.04 AP 00330929 2012/11/29( PRATT,GLEN EARL 634.82 AP 00330930 2012/11/29( PROPERTY OWNER FOR PO BOX 4889 476.76 AP 00330931 2012/11/29( PURUSHOTHAM, SELVAKUMAR 840.19 AP 00330932 2012/11/29( QUINTERO,DANILO 635.03 AP 00330933 2012/11/29( RAHBARI,MARYAM 201.95 AP 00330934 2012/11/29( RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY 2,267.55 AP 00330935 2012/11/29( RASMUSSEN,CHRISTINE N 353.26 AP 00330936 2012/11/29( RDMR LLC 201.47 AP 00330937 2012/11/29( REDEMPTION RELIANCE LLC 18.01 AP 00330938 2012/11/29( REISSMAN,S F REVOC TR 631.99 AP 00330939 2012/11/29( RIGESTI,GERMAN J 475.37 AP 00330940 2012/11/29( ROBINSON,DAVID S 476.36 AP 00330941 2012/11/29( ROCKY RIVER PROPERTIES LLC 83.09 AP 00330942 2012/11/29( RODRIGUEZ,DAVID E 634.67 AP 00330943 2012/11/29( RODRIGUEZ,ERNESTO J SR 634.93 AP 00330944 2012/11/29( RODRIGUEZ,RONALD JOSE 471.69 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P8 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00330945 2012/11/29( RODRIGUEZ, SHEILA L 476.57 AP 00330946 2012/11/29( ROMAGNA,DONNA 476.47 AP 00330947 2012/11/29( ROSALINDE&ARTHUR GILBERT FOUNDATION 30,854.83 AP 00330948 2012/11/29( ROSIN FAMILY TRUST 634.78 AP 00330949 2012/11/29( ROSS,JAMES STEVEN II 352.83 AP 00330950 2012/11/29( ROSSO,MICHAEL 635.46 AP 00330951 2012/11/29( ROTH,JANE M 477.07 AP 00330952 2012/11/29( RUBIO,ROBERT L 116.39 AP 00330953 2012/11/29( RUIZ,VERONICA R 233.96 AP 00330954 2012/11/29( RVR TRUST 54.71 AP 00330955 2012/11/29( SA REFKA LLC 1,088.83 AP 00330956 2012/11/29( SALCEDO,GABRIELA M 476.72 AP 00330957 2012/11/29( SALEHI,VAHID 155.29 AP 00330958 2012/11/29( SAMPLES,RYAN 477.26 AP 00330959 2012/11/29( SANCHEZ,REYNALDO T 476.95 AP 00330960 2012/11/29( SANDERS,KENYATTA 635.44 AP 00330961 2012/11/29( SANTOS,NINA MIRIAM B 155.64 AP 00330962 2012/11/29( SANTOS,ROBERT 634.78 AP 00330963 2012/11/29( SANTOS,THERESA Z 634.72 AP 00330964 2012/11/29( SBB GLOBAL MANAGEMENT INC 117.54 AP 00330965 2012/11/29( SCHALLER,SOSAN G 476.57 AP 00330966 2012/11/29( SCHEENSTRA CHILI'S 254.26 AP 00330967 2012/11/29( SCHENNUM,DAVID A 477.59 AP 00330968 2012/11/29( SCHILDER,BARBARA 478.97 AP 00330969 2012/11/29( SCOLLON,JAMES O 474.92 AP 00330970 2012/11/29( SCOTT,DUNCAN&KATHRYN REV LIV TR 478.32 AP 00330971 2012/11/29( SCP RANCHO I LLC 235.75 AP 00330972 2012/11/29( SHEN,JIFANG 311.93 AP 00330973 2012/11/29( SHIH,LING CHU 77.51 AP 00330974 2012/11/29( SHIPCOTT,DAVID S 476.94 AP 00330975 2012/11/29( SILHANEK FAMILY TRUST 233.96 AP 00330976 2012/11/29( SIMMONS,RICK A 57.37 AP 00330977 2012/11/29( SIR,LIN&ASSOCIATES LLC 674.43 AP 00330978 2012/11/29( SMIRL,CHRISTINE M 476.97 AP 00330979 2012/11/29( SMITS,JACLYN LEIGH 58.24 AP 00330980 2012/11/29( SOLANO,KARIN F 476.06 AP 00330981 2012/11/29( SONTAG,TERRENCE E 477.07 AP 00330982 2012/11/29( SOSA,ARNOLDO&ORALIA LIVING TRUST 155.50 AP 00330983 2012/11/29( SOUTHORN,PETER 634.75 AP 00330984 2012/11/29( SRG/CAMREAL LLC 172,669.25 AP 00330985 2012/11/29( STARLIGHT REALTY,LLC 25,413.03 AP 00330986 2012/11/29 t STEIN, STANLEY L 635.09 AP 00330987 2012/11/29( STEPHENS,CORINNE ANNE 476.84 AP 00330988 2012/11/29( STYADI,PIALA P 476.57 AP 00330989 2012/11/29( SUN,HUI-MING 311.66 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT pg Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00330990 2012/11/29( SUNIMAN,NORMAN D 634.92 AP 00330991 2012/11/29( SURETY INVESTMENTS 370.63 AP 00330992 2012/11/29( TANG,STEVEN&ELISA FAMILY TRUST 634.84 AP 00330993 2012/11/29( TAYLOR,FRED L 634.76 AP 00330994 2012/11/29( TERRELL-SAYLES,VALERIE L 634.60 AP 00330995 2012/11/29( TESSIER FAMILY TRUST 342.40 AP 00330996 2012/11/29( THOMAS,TRINCY 470.14 AP 00330997 2012/11/29( TOLL CA IV L P 1,269.46 AP 00330998 2012/11/29( TOPOR REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 478.44 AP 00330999 2012/11/29( TOTAL FAMILY LLC 334.85 AP 00331000 2012/11/29( TOWN CENTER II FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LP 42.79 AP 00331001 2012/11/29( TOWN SQUARE C LP 266.94 AP 00331002 2012/11/29( TRAN, SON HOANH 311.59 AP 00331003 2012/11/29( TUCKER,DENNIS K 634.93 AP 00331004 2012/11/29( TWIN OAKS LTD 470.08 AP 00331005 2012/11/29( TYLER,JAMES E 476.69 AP 00331006 2012/11/29( U S HUNG WUI INVESTMENTS INC 1,230.66 AP 00331007 2012/11/29( UDR RANCHO CUCAMONGA LP 120.72 AP 00331298 2012/12/05( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 229.18 AP 00331291 2012/12/05( ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 2,326.86 AP 00331287 2012/12/05( ALL CITIES TOOLS 170.00 AP 00331287 2012/12/05 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 30.00 AP 00331008 2012/11/29( UNITED ASSOCIATION OF JOURNEY MAN&API 12.87 AP 00331009 2012/11/29( UTICA AVENUE PROPERTIES,LLC 328.55 AP 00331010 2012/11/29 l UTICA EXECUTIVE SUITES,LLC 158.59 AP 00331011 2012/11/29( VALDERRAMA,GLADYS A 631.39 AP 00331012 2012/11/29( VALVERDE,TERESA 353.22 AP 00331013 2012/11/29( VAN STRYLAND FAMILY TRUST 635.26 AP 00331014 2012/11/29( VETTERANI,THOMAS A 477.37 AP 00331015 2012/11/29( VICTORIA GARDENS MALL LLC 256.82 AP 00331016 2012/11/29( VIGIL,MONICA 476.44 AP 00331017 2012/11/29( VILLANI,FRANK J 475.71 AP 00331018 2012/11/29( VO,BAN 635.55 AP 00331019 2012/11/29( WALKER FAMILY TRUST 635.44 AP 00331020 2012/11/29( WALTON,PATRICK B 634.79 AP 00331021 2012/11/29( WANG,CLIFF 354.52 AP 00331022 2012/11/29( WANG,PING 635.47 AP 00331023 2012/11/29( WANG,YAO HSIN 310.34 AP 00331024 2012/11/29( WEBSTER,JEAN PIERRE 476.98 AP 00331025 2012/11/29( WEEKS,KENNETH 470.64 AP 00331026 2012/11/29( WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES 273.64 AP 00331027 2012/11/29( WHEELER,DAPHNE B LIVING TRUST 476.57 AP 00331028 2012/11/29( WILBURN,CHRISTOPHER 353.22 AP 00331029 2012/11/29( WILLIAMS,KISHA 476.96 AP 00331030 2012/11/29( WILLIAMS,WILLIAM JEFFREY 476.65 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331031 2012/11/29( WILLIS,TERRY 476.68 AP 00331032 2012/11/29( WILMONT PROPERTIES LLC 891.39 AP 00331033 2012/11/29( WILSON,BOYD H 635.01 AP 00331034 2012/11/29( WILSON,JEREMY 116.62 AP 00331035 2012/11/29( WINSTON,ALAN M 158.82 AP 00331036 2012/11/29( WLP DEL MAR II LLC 6,194.20 AP 00331037 2012/11/29( WOLHAUPTER,KATHRYN E IRREV TR 201.93 AP 00331038 2012/11/29( WOLPE FAMILY TRUST 476.82 AP 00331039 2012/11/29( WONG,SUNNY 116.61 AP 00331040 2012/11/29( WOOLEN GROUP LLC 58.17 AP 00331041 2012/11/29 l WRIGHT,ROSALIE 309.85 AP 00331042 2012/11/29( YANG,CATHY 635.27 AP 00331043 2012/11/29( YEM,VANNA 391.38 AP 00331044 2012/11/29( YEOH FAMILY TRUST 634.89 AP 00331045 2012/11/29( YNS ENTERPRISE NO LLC 1,354.54 AP 00331046 2012/11/29( YOO,JONG HWAN 476.52 AP 00331047 2012/11/29( YOON,JOHN YONG-JIN 477.32 AP 00331048 2012/11/29( YOSHIDA,DAVE O 634.82 AP 00331049 2012/11/29( YOUNG,JON 477.36 AP 00331050 2012/11/29( YU,MORRISON&KATHARINE FAMILY TRUST 634.17 AP 00331051 2012/11/29( YU, STEPHANIE 637.38 AP 00331052 2012/11/29 l YU,YAE H 840.83 AP 00331053 2012/11/29( ZABALA,EDUARDO P JR 155.64 AP 00331054 2012/11/29( ZADINA,ROBERT F 828.94 AP 00331055 2012/11/29( ZHANG, SHIRLEY 155.48 AP 00331056 2012/11/29( ZHEN,YONGRAN 634.72 AP 00331057 2012/11/29( ZHOU,ZHOU 155.38 AP 00331058 2012/11/29( ZHU,WEI GANG 470.76 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 611.60 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 341.65 AP 00331273 2012/11/29( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 104.23 AP 00331273 2012/11/29( DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 308.88 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 416.48 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 205.13 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 359.36 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 177.00 AP 00331277 2012/11/29( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA r 6.10 AP 00331277 2012/11/29 l KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA r 29.68 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 47.56 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 42.30 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.63 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.00 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 62.76 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P11 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 77.71 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,274.00 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,555.24 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,004.74 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 535.01 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 169.23 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 6,817.70 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 2,249.69 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,579.67 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 10,869.53 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 18,514.23 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 51,273.00 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 50,896.67 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,022.06 AP 00331200 2012/11/28 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 53,007.57 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 106,015.14 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 50,896.67 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 14,054.84 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 16,312.86 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,053.12 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 12,247.01 AP 00331200 2012/11/28 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 13,399.38 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 53,007.57 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 52,317.80 AP 00331200 2012/11/28 l PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 1,030.76 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 6,592.60 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 122.16 AP 00331200 2012/11/28( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 53,007.57 AP 00331211 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTF 75,247.21 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 102.86 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 104.95 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 45.07 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 157.19 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 849.27 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,724.27 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 803.43 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,297.93 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 62.57 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 176.51 AP 00331298 2012/12/05( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 112.88 AP 00331298 2012/12/05( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 52.96 AP 00331298 2012/12/05( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 99.77 AP 00331298 2012/12/05( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 30.64 AP 00331298 2012/12/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 19.90 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P12 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331301 2012/12/05 ( CFPI 315.00 AP 00331306 2012/12/05( COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 781.40 AP 00331307 2012/12/05 l CONFIRE JPA 23,430.05 AP 00331307 2012/12/05( CONFIRE JPA 4,686.02 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 17.99 AP 00331330 2012/12/05 ( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 21.31 AP 00331330 2012/12/05( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 3.47 AP 00331322 2012/12/05( GRAINGER 11.23 AP 00331322 2012/12/05( GRAINGER 24.83 AP 00331322 2012/12/05 ( GRAINGER 117.75 AP 00331319 2012/12/05 ( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 160.65 AP 00331319 2012/12/05( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 326.16 AP 00331316 2012/12/05( EMS LABORATORIES 128.00 AP 00331379 2012/12/05( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 2,534.80 AP 00331379 2012/12/05( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 3,168.50 AP 00331366 2012/12/05 ( RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 26.25 AP 00331362 2012/12/05 ( QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 240.01 AP 00331362 2012/12/05( QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 487.30 AP 00331355 2012/12/05( NAPA AUTO PARTS 5.92 AP 00331355 2012/12/05( NAPA AUTO PARTS 71.07 AP 00331355 2012/12/05 ( NAPA AUTO PARTS 86.16 AP 00331342 2012/12/05 ( LIFE ASSIST INC 28.30 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 32.43 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 65.82 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 98.25 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 17.49 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 70.99 AP 00331384 2012/12/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 88.21 AP 00331384 2012/12/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 98.81 AP 00331384 2012/12/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 72.36 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 1,184.00 AP 00331420 2012/12/05( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 967.42 AP 00331416 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 1,936.45 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.38 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.38 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 477.62 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 477.62 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 477.62 AP 00331420 2012/12/05( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -143.81 AP 00331420 2012/12/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 322.47 AP 00331420 2012/12/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 967.42 AP 00331411 2012/12/05( VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 1,299.53 AP 00331411 2012/12/05( VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 2,100.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P13 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331402 2012/12/05( TURNOUT MAINTENANCE COMPANY LLC 419.00 AP 00331397 2012/12/05( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 48.75 AP 00331397 2012/12/05( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 42.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,326.62 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 518.07 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 137.55 AP 00331382 2012/12/05 ( SC FUELS 2,403.88 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 1,124.75 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 2,283.58 AP 00331382 2012/12/05 ( SC FUELS 1,184.00 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 2,403.89 AP 00331382 2012/12/05 ( SC FUELS 263.12 AP 00331382 2012/12/05 ( SC FUELS 534.20 AP 00331379 2012/12/05 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 633.70 AP 00331342 2012/12/05( LIFE ASSIST INC 88.49 AP 00331342 2012/12/05( LIFE ASSIST INC 199.15 AP 00331340 2012/12/05( KME FIRE APPARATUS 68.40 AP 00331337 2012/12/05( JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 1,116.50 AP 00331335 2012/12/05( ISG INFRASYS 1,054.16 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -15.51 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 40.32 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 92.47 AP 00331307 2012/12/05( CONFIRE JPA 18,744.04 AP 00331306 2012/12/05( COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 937.58 AP 00331302 2012/12/05( CFPI 315.00 AP 00331300 2012/12/05 ( CFPI 110.00 AP 00331298 2012/12/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1.06 AP 00331298 2012/12/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 49.14 EP 00002994 2012/11/28( ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS INC 393.75 EP 00002994 2012/11/28( ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS INC 12,323.00 Total for Entity: 1,349,888.18 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 P14 > N M Lo O Lo C 7 M OR w N w CD Q N O �'C O O O C O C Y ^ n ILL m w ,C y _O > U M ELI a) L- O tp U N O O o a K 0 2 E a � co N O N ^ a 3 N,0 d al F M co IT to CO N a }W 0 0 6 C O C T a) a) O L p U U .L Cl) a O U as c y c (D L,O « 0 0o w E H m •C N t0 aD V1 _7 a) y m 10 l6 C N > 7 0 L� O +� c O (D p-7 > X O O) n r n a a) N cn F C M co h co 0 0-0 T O L Q r- 0 N.N E O a) a) 0 N N w c �L « p n 0 c a7 N O ci N E a) O r 7.X CL CL �� N 0 7 N co O N M Lo U c O f6 �p O I� u) w N m> rn M co M o n COL= V n i. •- -W N r N r M U E C N N °oE E n (a in O Gl E N o a`)> > y N N w §Q c V = M p LO n O > p.0 0 Im CO L O v_ n S w k H � O) N L O /O 0 O m Cn0 .L-. N w Li . d 0 N O CD � .2 O O E co LO r-d p -' d /0> rn m c N o O M 1% � N LL E 7 >+ Q a. Z N I- N r M p y tv d 0 U LL c > O .0 CL-0 C c c 3 @ L a) eN N O C r- > o N O` of a co ' E 0 O LO M N O O o A o o U ro C ° ° r M o> N p- E c rn o c � � 0 C r co �° W r rnE 1A M L C ce-4 U O a) fV h (V N N C O a- 0 a�^ U N LL CD M 7N c N 0 (D � = C C E a)— O N O O O N f' U N Z .Q c M °' E E -= Vl N m a) O a)N C U c a O d c U p— N N ........... LL O E d 7 O y at N ap N C N Z r id > �� M w 4)-0 ~ O N • a~Ni N c y .O to m O O� a) C ,` b fA C V C f/1 C M C fC (0 m > 0 CL N c U m C Ua�i y ` Q c N co C a 0 _m _ E rn a Q E o? U W c co > �w c � t d Q m o u ++ c O 5 H L a c N Ua�•-,� W O. p > c� v > > co me O O > > U O m c o d � u°'- 2 s U a_ H H U Q W —QU a) -j w Of P15 r r O N c2 w a N (0 O O O a Q N ci co O LL a N N (o � m O a > 0 0 0 0 0 LL .+ co O a w f� O r N W I N I N C Q. d cl?r T (D I O Q? O I O O ( O G CD ca m 9 a a V (n O O d I M W O � O O O N y w to m eo O co rn am M 7 N N OD O CO O O N > r n co O (OD O 0) M Y W a M O M M c rt O (n O (q O co M O r r W (On 'OVA N N r m N N V N h N N N 41 N O N O r N N O 7 cc 10 to 1- n O � r h A V y v O N O O ao Y A N O M M Ql O Lr (n LQ (fl ) N N' N N A N N N N = 0 d . N EA, N ` W C) 4) O O N� O O O 0 C O � r O O O O O A ,Y O Of O O O O O at N L CO) d O O O o O CL 0 L'i Q Lct uD Q d N N (A N n N N N O � ca � d .0 d E LL ` Z N N N N N O w N N N co Li a N d a m n m 0 0 0 m m m co v m co n m O e Q m LL L vi (q o 0o M Y 4 W Cl) N co w a Q � O (`L a m r Z U N 0 Q F W W 2 > W Q ? U g > } W U d d J N Z O) Q Q O] W CD 7 W LL Z F- U) Q > J J > N(n > > J a Q a a U c a p c c A c �a A R _ OJ LL LL U O O O F � a � it a in o m' m' c G M E LL o •+ U (n (o n E °o y cD ID (D > w U) V C N V d O N m Q Q W J LC co QW� � C m ca CD P16 N W d Of Q N � n CL a O LLI �0..k co m o a Ay I- d p 1O a r N � O C N > d 0 0 0 2 0 d N N O ccd 7 M � > A Y O A 0 h O M m N j M O � O r V7 ci LC co M }� cc N V •w N N V C G1 N 2 r> vii, N > co c C r 0 0 V C 'jj M `m v m +�+ Cc d a N O p d O O E d . _O •O > LL Z dd U CL d ro 3 � a m 0 o° o o >m am C6 N Q Z w O J Q U LL O m Y c � Z d N m m N — Z d W O c Z > > C Q cc t N N 3k U c E C p E N > V o Q O C Y V � N t O � a 0 a p N IL .0 °o y O N v a v}i W PI d c L d O a O I U da CL CL d N O 0 co tb O N V c tff O O A M N A to Ci Cl) jp 01 M M A m to co to N O> N A � tp N A N N N N O O t0 t0 t0 c O O to N N O 3 G O O O O O d t O O M M M 9.- N Cl! N N < M M M O N V- N m °o °o °o °o 0 O m c° o ci °° ° ° °o r a o 0 0 4+ M d o 0 0 L 7° O O O y a c n U N E E > O CCL 0 l >+ Z H O ' O c O '> a ° N d cm v A U- f Q N tU a M N o 0 E p °z Z LL z a w z C/) o LLI z Q o U } LL W o E z o 0 0 0 N y z h N to T U O N C � r O C O E O c O• E LL 3 O .+ O U N E °o Q °o m c C N U) o T V O o O N Q Q CL a o m o v m i0 o N o d C m 7 V J U) d y LL rL w P18 State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation 10/31/2012 Carrying Cost Plus Description Accrued Interest Purch. Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasury: Bills $ 19,065,944,630.43 $ 19,079,407,850.00 NA Notes $ 14,730,451,110.16 $ 14,771,132,000.00 $ 14,934,907.50 Federal Agency: SBA $ 532,731,669.92 $ 533,233,533.89 $ 550,366.39 MBS-REMICs $ 279,050,279.32 $ 302,583,309.20 $ 1,333,499.55 Debentures $ 750,426,660.88 $ 751,178,500.00 $ 1,484,166.00 Debentures FR $ - $ - $ - Discount Notes $ 4,293,453,222.16 $ 4,297,190,000.00 NA GNMA $ 7,718.08 $ 7,776.60 $ 76.70 IBRD Debenture $ 399,951,803.28 $ 400,000,000.00 $ 750,000.00 IBRD Deb FR $ - $ - $ - CDs and YCDs FR $ 400,000,000.00 $ 400,000,000.00 $ 553,345.83 Bank Notes $ - $ - $ - CDs and YCDs $ 3,400,085,240.48 $ 3,399,549,073.61 $ 2,041,236.12 Commercial Paper $ 2,959,584,311.07 $ 2,959,530,627.78 NA Corporate: Bonds FR $ - $ - $ - Bonds $ - $ - $ - Repurchase Agreements $ - $ - $ - Reverse Repurchase $ - $ - $ - Time Deposits $ 4,367,640,000.00 $ 4,367,640,000.00 NA AB 55 & GF Loans $ 11,779,840,040.72 $ 11,779,840,040.72 NA TOTAL $ 62,959,166,686.50 $ 63,041,292,711.80 $ 21,647,598.09 Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 63,062,940,309.89 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). P19 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Don Cloughesy, Deputy Fire Chief Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer Pamela Pane, Management Analyst II Subject: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD THE PURCHASE OF TWO (2) TYPE I FIRE ENGINES, AS BUDGETED FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, FROM KOVATCH (KME) OF CALIFORNIA, IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,062,381.00, PER RFP #12/13-101, FROM FUND 3288501-5604 (CAPITAL OUTLAY-VEHICLES) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Fire Board approve the purchase of two (2) Type I Fire Engines, as budgeted for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District), from KME Kovatch of California, in the amount of $1,062,381.00, per RFP #12/13-101, from Fund 3288501-5604 (Capital Outlay-Vehicles). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS With this purchase we are replacing two front line Engine Companies that will be moved to reserve (78-03 114,585 miles, 79-03 68,863 miles). Two reserve Engine Companies will be surplussed (50-92 143,704 miles, 51-92 179,629 miles). National fire service standards recommend front line apparatus should be considered for replacement after 10 years of service, moved into reserve status for 5 years, then be removed from the fleet (National Fire Protection Association 1901, "Standard for Automotive Fire Apparatus", 2009 ed.). Because this is a guideline, other factors are also considered when scheduling the replacement of Fire Apparatus. Maintenance costs, current regulatory requirements and performance are a few of those factors. This situation is a good example, as both Engines being surplussed are 20 years old. They have provided great service, but parts are no longer easy to find and they do not meet current smog standards. The Engines being moved to reserve status meet the 10 year mark yet have different mileages due to their assignment. The unit with the lower mileage will be placed at the Jersey Station (174) as the primary reserve engine providing the Fire District with reliable back up apparatus which is an NFPA and Insurance Services Office (ISO) requirement. District staff provided specifications for two (2) Type I Fire Engines to the Purchasing Division. Purchasing prepared and posted formal RFP #12/13-101 to the City's automated procurement system. As a result, there were eighty-one (81) vendors notified, twelve (12) P20 STAFF REPORT RE:PURCHASE OF TWO(2)TYPE I FIRE ENGINES DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 2 vendors downloaded the RFP documentation, and two (2) responses were received and evaluated. An Evaluation Committee, consisting of staff from the District and Purchasing, conducted a through analysis of the RFP responses, scored, and ranked them. The consolidated scores resulted in KME of California as the finalist. Therefore, staff is recommending an award to KME in accordance with the specifications published in RFP #12/13-101. All applicable documentation is on file in the City's electronic Procurement system and can be located through the City's Internet. The engines will include equipment upon delivery (that on past engine purchases was purchased and installed separately by Fire District staff - Mobile Data Computers and radios, as an example) to cut down on man-hours the fire shop would usually spend on receiving and installing these pieces of equipment. There has also been a change in the mandates on the engine requirements for emissions, which added approximately $15,000 per engine. Once a contract is executed the lead time for building and equipping these engines for service will take from 9-12 months depending on factory orders. Respectfully submitted, __0 Mike Bell Fire Chief P21 STAFF REPORT - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION DECLARING RESULTS OF ASPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.85-1,ANNEXATION NO.12-6 AND ORDERING THE -ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVE.SOUTH OF LIMA DR. IN COMMUNITY FACIILI IES DISTRICT NO.85-1(LVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC, OWNER—APN:0227-01224) RECOMMENDATION Consideration of approval of a resolution declaring results of a special election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-5 (a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 1.91 acres into eight (8) residential lots). BACKGROUND On October 3, 2012, the Board declared its intention to annex APN 0227-012-24 into CFD No. 85-1. On November 7, 2012, a public hearing was held regarding the annexation and following such hearing, the Board of Directors adopted a resolution calling for a special election to submit the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory a ballot measure pertaining to the authorization to levy a special tax within the Annexation Territory. A special election was scheduled for November 14, 2012. On November 14, 2012, the landowner submitted their ballot to the Board Secretary. The Board Secretary has canvassed the ballot and completed the statement of votes cast (see Exhibit "A" of Resolution). The Landowner cast their vote unanimously in favor of the levy of the special tax in the Annexation Territory. Adoption of this resolution constitutes the formal action of the Board declaring the results of the election and the annexation of the Annexation Territory to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 and directs the recordation of an amendment to the existing Notice of Special Tax Lien. By recordation of this amendment, prospective purchasers of property within the Annexation Territory will have notice of the special tax obligation affecting such property. Respec Ily subm* ed, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Resolution No. FD 12-.053 2. CFD 85-1 Map P22 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-053 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 12-5 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS,the Board of Directors(the"Board")of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, the area proposed to be annexed is known and designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO. 12-5 ("Annexation Territory"), and, WHEREAS,the Board did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified voters of the Annexation Territory a proposition to levy a special tax in the Annexation Territory; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified voters, and the Board desires to declare the favorable results of the election and to order the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The Board hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the Election Official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A", referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The Secretary is hereby directed to enter in the minutes of this meeting the results of the election and the STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. The Board hereby orders the annexation of the Annexation Territory to the District and further determines that the Board is now authorized to levy the special taxes within the Annexation Territory as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexation Territory. P23 SECTION 5. Immediately upon adoption of this Resolution, the AMENDMENT TO THE NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN (NOTICE OF ANNEXATION) shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the_day of 2012. Executed this_day of 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-053 - Page 2 of 3 P24 CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )SS RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ) THE UNDERSIGNED, AS ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BE.RNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 12-5 SPECIAL ELECTION In said Fire Protection District held on November 14, 2012, I FURTHER.CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in said District, and the totals of the respective columns and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct. I. TOTAL NUMBER OF VO'T'ES CAST: Z- 11. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES FOR FOR AND AGAINST PROPOSITION A. AGAINST NA WITNESS my hand and official Seal this JS ��day of „j ,_, �� .,xE - , 2012. f � i EleAfi qn Official Rancho'Gueamonga Fire Protection District State of California v- LO W* N P25 a� co v- N V O O Z > J co Q 04 0 c 0 - AV AJJayo C U C) o y r' _ �._.._.._.._.. cj� �, J ti.� LO = Q i C o C O --r- m _ L• 1 x Q m 1 CO Q 0o 0 LL Q .�.._..'nV I se3 cn my epuM j ny epuenn118 i O i V i 18 �aajo ea ;. I ny Ja;sayoo�j ny JaIsayOoH i ny ua�!11!W —.._.._.._.._. ny uaN!II!W 1 1 ny uaneH , ny uaneH i i ny esowaaH ny esowJaH ny pleq!yoad AV pleq!yojV i i _ ny uew11aH ■ .w ny uewllaH U) L_ 1 L v 1 ID ny pie/(au!n IS ue!1auieo i w4 �smpf� Eq_°-2 • _ ny anal ;srEY�oo SAE • M oP LL QJ T Im'H If. of V g S�a �oE u (n m SEE Bes �S = m g��%v aggF S.oe S O =55roap"��,�° �2 U -E l---j---H;a o P26 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO ADOPT AN ANNEXATION MAP SHOWING ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 1100-131-01 (LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, OWNER), LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVE. AND MILLER AVE., WHICH IS PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED INTO CFD NO. 85-1 RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a resolution adopting Annexation Map No. 12-7 showing property (located on the southeast corner of Etiwanda Ave. and Miller Ave.) proposed to be annexed into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. BACKGROUND Lennar Homes of California, owner of certain property (APN 1100-131-01) located within the Fire Protection District, is conditioned to annex into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. In order to initiate formal proceedings to annex the referenced parcel into CFD No. 85-1, a Resolution adopting an annexation map is presented for Board consideration and approval. The annexation map (Exhibit "A") illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire development project proposed by the owner. Respectfully submit d, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution No FD 12-054 P27 Q p a o !2g" P-JOk 1 1 W p� i 3 F cWi i it 0 HISHI b « �� I` �a O 0 6€k<-- !Z}y w I wl cc X11401 az O ` ¢ R W Qi R $� LL Q G I LL (7 Ys i z � E5 ise v Ir 3 za z _ fib b <� W s � m Ir z I r OVA ZI. W ° w = Zy 01 W Q Z �rZ w X° LU > cn LLJ Z O; �, Z �s. Q w Q' G � Z 0 ¢ g O �s� Vii= i 3nNiAv baNVMll3 W1 a . . < Lu A-, P28 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-054 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 12-7) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 12-7 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: The Annexation Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. SECTION 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the Annexation Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder., all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. P29 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 12012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-054 - Page 2 of 2 P30 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY REFERRED TO AS ANNEXATION NO.12 7(APN:1100-131-01—LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA,OWNER) LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVE.AND MILLER AVE. INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.85-1,SPECIFYING SERVICES PROPOSED TO BE FINANCED,TO SET AND SPECIFY THE SPECIAL TAXES PROPOSED TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE ANNEXATION TERRITORY AND SET A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE ANNEXATION RECOMMENDATION Adoption of a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 12-7 into Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (the "District"), to specify the services to be financed, to set and specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation. BACKGROUND Lennar Homes of California, owner of certain property (APN 1100-131-01) within the Fire Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District to annex such property into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving an annexation map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District; (b) the facilities and services which will, in part, be financed (Exhibit "A" of said Resolution) through the levy of the special tax on the Territory if annexed; (d) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Exhibit "B" of said Resolution); (e) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for February 6, 2013 and (f) election requirements. P31 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ANNEX DECEMBER 19,2012 Warren Diven, Special Counsel for the District, has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolution is considered to be routine and non-controversial, as the property owners are in support of the annexation procedure. On February 6, 2013, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Resolution No FD 12-055 2. CFD 85-1 Map P32 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-055 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 12-7) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 WHEREAS, the BOARD OF DIRECTORS of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the"Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act"). The Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 12-7 to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted,which map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt its Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to District, to describe the territory included within District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the facilities and services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory,to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such facilities and services, and to set a time and place for a public he relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW,THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: RECITALS SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. LEGAL AUTHORITY SECTION 2: These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. INTENTION TO ANNEX; DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY AND THE DISTRICT SECTION 3. This legislative body hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. P33 A description of the Territory is as follows: All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by this legislative body, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on maps of the original District and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the original District. Copies of such maps are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. SERVICES AND FACILITIES AUTHORIZED TO BE FINANCED BY THE DISTRICT SECTION 4: The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District are generally described as the performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services to the territory within the existing District. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide the Services. The services proposed to be provided within the Territory and to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within Territory are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference(the"Services"). If and to the extent feasible the services shall be provided in common within the existing District and the Territory. The facilities that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District are generally described as (a) the acquisition of land for fire stations, (b) design and construction of fire stations and (c) purchase and acquisition of fire suppression apparatus and equipment. The facilities proposed to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied in the Territory are generally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. If and to the extent that it is feasible the facilities shall be provided in common for the existing District and the Territory. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 2 of 9 P34 SPECIAL TAXES SECTION 5: It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services, Facilities and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit B (the "Special Tax Formula"),which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services and Facilities in the existing District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services and Facilities in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services and Facilities in the existing District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the Special Tax Formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable, this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District. Resolution No. 12-0.55 - Page 3 of 9 P35 PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 6: NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 6th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013,AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD. AT SUCH PUBLIC HEARING, PROTESTS AGAINST THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY, THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE.TERRITORY OR ANY OTHER PROPOSALS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION MAY BE MADE ORALLY BY ANY INTERESTED PERSON. ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE SECRETARY PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. MAJORITY PROTEST SECTION 7: If (a) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the District, (b) 50% or more of the registered voters, or six (6) registered voters, whichever is more, residing within the Territory, (c) owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory included in the District, or(d) owners of one-half or more of the area of land included in the Territory, file written protests against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 4 of 9 P36 ELECTION SECTION 8: Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, if the legislative body determines to proceed with the annexation, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. NOTICE. SECTION 9: Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the Secretary by publication in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 5 of 9 P37 PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 12012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a regular meeting of said Board held on the day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 6 of 9 P38 EXHIBIT 'A' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES The Services. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services(the"Services")that are in addition to those currently provided in or required for the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be financed is as follows: The performance of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory. The Facilities. It'is the intention of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities (the "Facilities") that are in addition to those currently provided to serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already available to serve the Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment,with a useful life of five (5) years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting from new development within the Territory. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 7 of 9 P39 EXHIBITS' COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 12-7 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as.follows: To pay for fire suppression services and to finance fire suppression facilities, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-7 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($154.78) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($154.78) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($154.78) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) ± {.35 (TU-4) ($154.78)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($154.78) + {.30 (TU-14) ($154.78)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($154.78) + {.25 (TU-30) ($154.78)} 81 — up DU: 23.15 = ($154.78) + {.20 (TU-80) ($154.78)} Commercial ($154.78) per acre + $.084 per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + $.102 per SF Note: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2012 and each July 1 st thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 8 of 9 P40 REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a .01 cent reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall also be granted a .01 cent reduction (not cumulative) in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; - which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or"utility release"from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; which has an existing building or structure onsite; which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services— Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Resolution No. 12-055 - Page 9 of 9 cn 9 cOoV_ V_ yr M cn Z 1 00 O Q >' ° '� O o = U U AV fJJ9q:D 4) 0 LO CD Q J m +� V = ! a) X = o! Q ! a> L 3 i m 0 0 LL Q LL Q 1 ' .�.._..'n�;Se3 (n my epueMIJEJ ny epueMI13 i i O i V i 18 �aajo Aecl ny IaI ny J91s9uoo�l i ny ua�!ll!w —.._.._.._.._. ny UeN!II!W i i i ny uaneH ny uaneH i ny esowJaH ny esowJaH nb' pleq!4oj`d . mr ny pleq!4ojy i ny uewllaH ® "Ol —AV uewllaH cn i L d' ny pie�(au!n IS uegauje:D ANSI Q �ad�Ya;�d i • nm9'a4 � �sstx€`mss""sgA� �. . ny anwE) ps"ErPgo�_$ Fn 0-1 .� lE 0 n v&p m LL E��sp`y�e>.Tx N � c`m Eq$EAw qE4� U) N aEE� 9°e _tla Go U guu .ogg qso P42 STAFF REPORT I ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Services Manager Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A FIVE (5) YEAR LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO XEROX CORPORATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $450,000 FOR THE LEASE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF ONE (1) LOT OF MULTI-FUNCTION COPIERS; AWARD A FIVE (5) YEAR SERVICE AND SUPPLIES CONTRACT, WITH THE OPTION TO RENEW FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS, TO XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES, WITH ANNUAL COSTS NOT TO EXCEED $60,000, IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUEST FOR BID #12/13-001; AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ALLOCATE RELATED FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 EXPENDITURES FROM APPLICABLE CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a five (5) year lease purchase agreement to Xerox Finance Services in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for the lease purchase and installation of one (1) lot of multi-function copiers; award a five (5) year service and supplies contract, wft-K the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, to Xerox Corporation of Santa Ana, California, with annual costs not to exceed $60,000, in accordance with request for bid #12/13-001 and authorize staff to allocate related fiscal year 2012-13 expenditures from applicable City and Fire District account numbers in accordance with the approved fiscal year 2012-13 budget. BACKGROUND The current City and Fire District copiers were originally leased purchased in 2006, and are now experiencing the diminished performance and increased repairs associated with equipment that has reached the end of its useful life. Copier replacements were originally planned for 2011, but that was deferred due to budget constraints. However, replacements can no longer be deferred due to increasing failure rates and age of this equipment. In coordination with the Purchasing Division, the Information Services Division submitted specifications for replacement copiers and a corresponding service and supplies contract. The Division also reviewed the City's copier fleet to identify possible efficiencies, including the elimination and consolidation of copiers. With the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency, and P43 DECEMBER 19,2012 the consolidation of fax services into a multifunction unit, several units were able to be consolidated to reduce inventory. Also, several models were working beyond capacity will be replaced with a better fit based on current usage. The Purchasing Division prepared and posted a formal RFB #12/13-001 on September 17, 2012, inviting copier manufactures to provide competitive bid opportunities to the City. Ninety-eight (98) vendors were notified, twenty-eight (28) prospective bidders downloaded the RFB solicitation, and five (5) responses were received. One of the five responses no-bid the project, one (1) vendor withdrew their bid response due to its inability to meet the City's contractual requirements, and three (3) vendors were considered responsive. In addition to meeting the City's copier needs, this new equipment provides environmentally friendly features such as color scanning directly sent to email which reduces the use of paper. Xerox also has a recycling program for used supplies and an end-of-life management program for used equipment. Staff also evaluated the one-time purchase of the copiers versus a lease purchase over a five-year period. The prior copiers were also lease-purchased. The five-year capital lease underwritten by Xerox Financial Services provides a competitive annual interest rate of 0.50%, includes no administrative costs for lease, and spreads payments in equal annual installments over five years, with the copiers becoming City property at the end of the lease. As a common and cost effective practice, the City and Fire District has used an annual multi- function copier service and supplies contract that provides maintenance, repair, and replacement of consumable supplies such as toner, staples, and other components. Along with the replacement of multi-function copiers, the adoption of a services and supplies contract for the new equipment is requested. After analysis of the bid responses, it was determined that Xerox Corporation is the lowest, most responsive, and responsible bidder for the lease purchase of copiers with the annual service and supplies contract included together as a package. The per copy cost offered by Xerox is lower than the current costs we are paying which will reduce the annual service and supplies cost for the City and Fire District. Therefore, staff recommends that Council award a five (5) year.lease purchase to Xerox Financial Services for one (1) lot of multi-function copiers, and a service and supplies contract to Xerox Corporation for five (5) years, with the option to renew for two additional one year periods, up to a total of seven (7) years, in accordance with RFB#12/13-001. The budget amount requested for the lease purchase is a "not to exceed" amount to allow for administrative adjustments based on model types prior to the final order. All bid documentation can be located on the City's bid system and is on file in the Purchasing Division*. Respectfully submitted, C L Sassoon ' Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331059 2012/11/28( A&V SOFTBALL 3,475.00 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 902.77 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,642.56 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,210.31 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,642.56 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 864.51 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 778.06 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 402.34 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 345.80 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 259.35 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 172.90 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 129.68 AP 00331060 2012/11/28( ABM JANITORIAL SW 129.68 AP 00331061 2012/11/28( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 205.54 AP 00331061 2012/11/28( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 205.54 AP 00331061 2012/11/28( ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC. 418.96 AP 00331062 2012/11/28( ACTION AWARDS INC. 600.00 AP 00331062 2012/11/28( ACTION AWARDS INC. 749.71 AP 00331063 2012/11/28( ADVANCED EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTS 3,403.20 AP 00331063 2012/11/28( ADVANCED EDUCATIONAL PRODUCTS 201.32 AP 00331064 2012/11/28( ALL CITIES TOOLS 318.09 AP 00331065 2012/11/28( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 18,441.00 AP 00331065 2012/11/28 ( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 19,854.81 AP 00331066 2012/11/28( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00331430 2012/12/06( ABC LOCKSMITHS 67.88 AP 00331430 2012/12/06( ABC LOCKSMITHS 13.47 AP 00331430 2012/12/06( ABC LOCKSMITHS 9.69 AP 00331431 2012/12/06( AIRGAS USA LLC 54.85 AP 00331432 2012/12/06( CALSENSE 1,567.19 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 869.74 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.35 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 475.41 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 80.10 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 288.46 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 718.49 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 171.37 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 258.93 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 189.19 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 148.69 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 456.33 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.11 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 262.69 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 273.97 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 197.62 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 116.66 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 266.45 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 285.25 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.58 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 279.61 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 113.42 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 144.98 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,103.23 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 356.97 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 74.46 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 146.86 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 199.50 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,243.87 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.22 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 98.84 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 235.22 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.73 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 204.48 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.06 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.26 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,084.61 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 201.83 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,648.69 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 230.99 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 490.17 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,257.80 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 191.01 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.09 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 83.34 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 72.19 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 125.22 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.80 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 446.68 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,833.61 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,908.00 AP 00331434 2012/12/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,201.05 AP 00331435 2012/12/06( EMCOR SERVICE 2,569.45 AP 00331435 2012/12/06( EMCOR SERVICE 7,845.60 AP 00331435 2012/12/06( EMCOR SERVICE 1,241.00 AP 00331435 2012/12/06( EMCOR SERVICE 15,946.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P46 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331436 2012/12/06( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,093.88 AP 00331436 2012/12/06( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 163.46 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,320.00 AP 00331437 2012/12/06( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 2,497.62 AP 00331438 2012/12/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 968.14 AP 00331438 2012/12/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 200.15 AP 00331438 2012/12/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 90.24 AP 00331439 2012/12/06( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 286.72 AP 00331439 2012/12/06( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 662.87 AP 00331439 2012/12/06( HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 29.33 AP 00331439 2012/12/06 l HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 62.96 AP 00331440 2012/12/06( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 411.56 AP 00331440 2012/12/06( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 303.76 AP 00331441 2012/12/06( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,273.20 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 132.18 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 233.31 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 158.49 AP 00331442 2012/12/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 142.10 AP 00331443 2012/12/06( KLAUS AND SONS 805.32 AP 00331444 2012/12/06( LIMS AUTO INC 622.18 AP 00331444 2012/12/06( LIMS AUTO INC 85.14 AP 00331444 2012/12/06( LIMS AUTO INC 1,627.25 AP 00331444 2012/12/06( LIMS AUTO INC 370.85 AP 00331446 2012/12/06( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 3.43 AP 00331446 2012/12/06( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 56.89 AP 00331446 2012/12/06( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,283.68 AP 00331446 2012/12/06( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 166.11 AP 00331446 2012/12/06( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 2,685.95 AP 00331447. 2012/12/06( SUNRISE FORD 84.33 AP 00331447 2012/12/06( SUNRISE FORD 17.02 AP 00331447 2012/12/06( SUNRISE FORD 178.58 AP 00331447 2012/12/06( SUNRISE FORD 8.58 AP 00331447 2012/12/06( SUNRISE FORD 75.38 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.26 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 650.54 AP 00331448 2012/12/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 93.08 AP 00331263 2012/11/29( ABC LOCKSMITHS 8.61 AP 00331264 2012/11/29( AUTO BODY 2000 915.70 AP 00331264 2012/11/29( AUTO BODY 2000 7,373.95 AP 00331264 2012/11/29( AUTO BODY 2000 915.70 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 16.44 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 531.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 791.19 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 11.53 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 29.84 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date:. 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P47 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 274.73 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.07 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 37.45 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 131.16 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 18.38 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 24.20 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 27.11 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 27.46 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 75.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 52.90 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 132.99 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.35 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 42.57 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 28.11 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 54.52 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 25.20 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.17 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 26.89 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 11.37 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 15.68 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 29.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 25.20 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 16.80 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 30.91 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 29.31 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 31.34 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 15.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 27.11 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 14.54 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 24.36 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.73 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 44.55 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 116.22 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 355.15 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P48 Asenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.41 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 93.72 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.88 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 44.70 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29 l BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 47.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 20.33 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 164.06 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.07 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 39.42 AP 00331268 2012/11/29{ BRODART BOOKS 112.78 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 611.96 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 18.44 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 288.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 14.54 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 18.38 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.53 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 210.71 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 23.27 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 15.68 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 10.17 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 12.56 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 11.37 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 15.68 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 27.14 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 36.79 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.35 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 68.11 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 16.24 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 12:88 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: . 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P49 Asenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 14.01 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 43.11 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.46 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 9.54 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 33.85 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 16.24 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 53.31 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.88 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 62.43 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.88 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 40.23 AP 00331268 20 12/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 11.10 AP 00331268 2012/11/29 l BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 6.63 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 4.47 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 13.26 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 8.94 AP 00331268 2012/11/29( BRODART BOOKS 17.88 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 225.82 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 181.09 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.85 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 656.61 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 153.55 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,285.41 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P50 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 173.19 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 577.07 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,321.57 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.57 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.74 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 430.01 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 332.25 AP 00331272 2012/11/29(. CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 566.02 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.25 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,795.96 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,002.91 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,187.52 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 130.98 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 44.78 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 186.15 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 198.91 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 374.65 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 222.16 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.53 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 413.09 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 219.97 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 740.61 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.26 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 386.77 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 246.50 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,078.72 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 121.52 AP 00331272 2012/11/29 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 919.60 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 445.94 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 452.57 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 826.78 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.26 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 210.78 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,192.09 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 23,417.50 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 915.18 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,527.39 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 886.45 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 377.37 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 478.89 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 57.74 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 371.73 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,045.57 AP 00331272. 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 127.22 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P51 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 95.20 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 676.52 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 362.70 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 275.20 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 79.00 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,411.93 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 632.32 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 147.78 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,811.05 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 139.02 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.28 AP 00331272 2012/11/29 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 267.18 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 395.85 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 172.99 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 400.76 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 277.73 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( 'CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 88.20 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,768.35 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,324.08 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 211.87 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 300.29 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 592.52 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 466.02 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,003.58 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,432.01 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 208.83 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 897.50 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 123.34 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 634.03 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,079.26' AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 131.14 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT . 3,023.35 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 220.18 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 114.06 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 323.58 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 106.42 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 486.46 . AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,176.10 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,093.27 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT . 1,167.12 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 299.14 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.41 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.80 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 282.22 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 175.06 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: . 8 Current Date: 12/12/, Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P52 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,808.51 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 111.77 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,597.67 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 137.35 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,260.31 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 195.87 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 461.97 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 689.76 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 665.45 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 29.15 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,429.94 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 32.39 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,457.11 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 893.08 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,841.14 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 756.06 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,594.14 AP 00331272 2012/11/29 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 445.05 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,683.01 AP 00331272 2012/1 1/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 610.20 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,587.63 AP 00331272 2012/11/29( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,296.47 AP 00331272 2012/11/29 l CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 972.64 AP 00331274 2012/11/29( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 442.16 AP 00331274 2012/11/29( GENERATOR SERVICES CO 2,497.62 AP 00331274 2012/11/29( GENERATOR SERVICES CO .2,333.53 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 21.53 AP 00331275 2012/11/29( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 21.53 AP 00331276 2012/11/29( KLAUS AND SONS 1,085.00 AP 00331276 2012/11/29( KLAUS AND SONS 1,150.00 AP 00331276 2012/11/29( KLAUS AND SONS 350.44 AP 00331277 2012/11/29( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 518.50 AP 00331277 2012/11/29( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 1,626.67 AP 00331277 2012/11/29( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA L 39.23 AP 00331277 2012/11/29( KONICA MINOLTA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS USA I 1,331.56 AP 00331278 2012/11/29( LIMS AUTO INC 265.88 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 212.62 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 496.34 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 316.79 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 30.77 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,178.69 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 530.52 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 440.44 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 611.80 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,762.09 User: VLOPEZ VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P53 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 166.47 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 937.52 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 177.48 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 140.21 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 572.96 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 665.77 AP 00331279 2012/11/29( MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 975.00 AP 00331280 2012/11/29( SUNRISE FORD 99.13 AP 00331280 2012/11/29( SUNRISE FORD 32.91 AP 00331281 2012/11/29( TW TELECOM 3,970.50 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.58 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 891.78 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 97.40 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 76.44 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 766.92 AP 00331282 2012/11/29( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 97.40 AP 00331067 2012/11/28( AMERICAN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS INC 760.39 AP 00331068 2012/11/28( AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 1,485.00 AP 00331068 2012/11/28( AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 250.37 AP 00331069 2012/11/28( APPLIED PLANNING 52,314.30 AP 00331070 2012/11/28( AREA SOURCES S.C.A.Q.M.D. 169.49 AP 00331071 2012/11/28( AROCHO,ALMA 197.50 AP 00331071 2012/11/28( AROCHO,ALMA 348.00 AP 00331071 2012/11/28( AROCHO,ALMA 144.00 AP 00331071 2012/11/28 ( AROCHO,ALMA 396.00 AP 00331072 2012/11/28( ASAP POWERSPORTS 160.00 AP 00331073 2012/11/28( ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP 00331073 2012/11/28( ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP 00331073 2012/11/28( ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP 00331073 2012/11/28( ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,038.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,519.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 1,519.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 882.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28 l AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,724.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 24,356.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28 ( AUFBAU CORPORATION 7,660.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,955.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 3,430.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,793.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 147.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 588.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 294.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,107.00 AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,915.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P54 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00331074 2012/11/28( AUFBAU CORPORATION 2,916.00 AP 00331075 2012/11/28( AVALON COLLISION CENTER 2,143.78 AP 00331076 2012/11/28( AVANTS,MARGE 135.00 AP 00331076 2012/11/28( AVANTS,MARGE 90.00 AP 00331077 2012/11/28( BARRETO,RAQUEL M. 733.00 AP 00331078 2012/11/28( BERNARD,JEREMY 2700 AP 00331078 2012/11/28( BERNARD,JEREMY 14.70 AP 00331079 2012/11/28( BERNARD,JESSICA NASH 27.00 AP 00331079 2012/11/28( BERNARD,JESSICA NASH 14.70 AP 00331080 2012/11/28( BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 176.00 AP 00331080 2012/11/28( BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 512.89 AP 00331081 2012/11/28( BEST GOLF CARTS INC. 400.00 AP 00331082 2012/11/28 l BIA BALDY VIEW CHAPTER 85.00 AP 00331083 2012/11/28( BISHOP COMPANY 66.93 AP 00331084 2012/11/28( BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC. 1,474.02 AP 00331085 2012/11/28( BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 1,774.49 AP 00331086 2012/11/28( BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY 26.50 AP 00331087 2012/11/28( BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 4,206.00 AP 00331087 2012/11/28( BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN INC. 7,016.00 AP 00331088 2012/11/28( CABLE INC. 315.00 AP 00331089 2012/11/28( CALIFORNIA LIBERTY INVESTMENT LLC 100.00 AP 00331090 2012/11/28( CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL REVENUE&TAX ASS( 50.00 AP 00331091 2012/11/28( CARGANILLA,PAUL 500.00 AP 00331092 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 37.30 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 75.32 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -18.32 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 49.77 AP 00331093 2012/11/28 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 232.08 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 150.15 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 45.13 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -45.13 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 135.74 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -42.02 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -123.60 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 102.03 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 262.18 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -129.41 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 31.45 AP 00331093 2012/11/28( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 15.06 AP 00331094 2012/11/28( CASCADE TURF LLC 771.18 AP 00331094 . 2012/11/28( CASCADE TURF LLC 86.94 AP 00331094 2012/11/28( CASCADE TURF LLC 136.38 AP 00331095 2012/11/28( CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT 220.35 AP 00331096 2012/11/28( CASINO DE PARIS INC. 2,600.00 AP 00331097 2012/11/28( CDW-G 3,782.18 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P55 Agenda Check Resister 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331098 2012/11/28( CENTRE FOR ORGANIZATION EFFECTIVENESS, 35.00 AP 00331099 2012/11/28( CHO,CAROL 35.00 AP 00331100 2012/11/28( CIRIACKS,VALERIE ANN 81.00 AP 00331100 2012/11/28( CIRIACKS,VALERIE ANN 54.00 AP 00331101 2012/11/28( CITY RENTALS 161.00 AP 00331102 2012/11/28( CLAIREMONT EQUIPMENT COMPANY 46.74 AP 00331103 2012/11/28( CLARK,KAREN 108.00 AP 00331104 2012/11/28( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 39.87 AP 00331105 2012/11/28( COAST RECREATION INC 223.32 AP 00331106 2012/11/28( COCHERELL,DOREEN 115.20 AP 00331107 2012/11/28( COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 153.00 AP 00331108 2012/11/28( CONCEPT POWDER COATING 510.00 AP 00331109 2012/11/28( CONTACT SECURITY INC 7,066.56 AP 00331109 2012/11/28( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,494.08 AP 00331109 2012/11/28( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,909.76 AP 00331109 2012/11/28( CONTACT SECURITY INC 1,247.04 AP 00331109 2012/11/28 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,244.02 AP 00331109 2012/11/28( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,961.72 AP 00331110 2012/11/28( CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 79.40 AP 00331110 2012/11/28( CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 16.39 AP 00331111 2012/11/28( COOPER,CHERYL 277.20 AP 00331111 2012/11/28( COOPER,CHERYL 72.00 AP 00331111 2012/11/28( COOPER,CHERYL 32.00 AP 00331112 2012/11/28( COVARRUBIAS,CHRISTINA 500.00 AP 00331113 2012/11/28( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 426.16 AP 00331113 2012/11/28( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 616.87 AP 00331113 2012/11/28( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 299.01 AP 00331113 2012/11/28( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 279.08 AP 00331113 2012/11/28( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 299.01 AP 00331114 2012/11/28( DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 378.65 AP 00331115 2012/11/28( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 36.00 AP 00331115 2012/11/28( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 36.00 AP 00331115 2012/11/28( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 45.00 AP 00331115 2012/11/28( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 15.00 AP 00331116 2012/11/28( DOWNEY,JENNIFER 11.02 AP 00331117 2012/11/28( DUNN,ANN MARIE 135.00 AP 00331117 2012/11/28( DUNN,ANN MARIE 81.00 AP 00331117 2012/11/28( DUNN,ANN MARIE 180.00 AP 00331117 2012/11/28( DUNN,ANN MARIE 153.00 AP 00331117 2012/11/28( DUNN,ANN MARIE 60.00 AP 00331118 2012/11/28( EARLEY,IDA 129.60 AP 00331118 2012/11/28( EARLEY, IDA 28.80 AP 00331119 2012/11/28( EASTERLING,RAY 115.20 AP 00331119 2012/11/28( EASTERLING,RAY 28.80 AP 00331119 2012/11/28( EASTERLING,RAY 24.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P56 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331120 2012/11/28( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 150.00 AP 00331120 2012/11/28( ELLIS ENTERPRISES 940.00 AP 00331121 2012/11/28( EN POINTE TECHNOLOGIES SALES INC 41,456.54 AP 00331122 2012/11/28( ENGRAVE'N EMBROIDER THINGS 178.77 AP 00331123 2012/11/28( ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 1,350.06 AP 00331124 2012/11/28( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 28.49 AP 00331124 2012/11/28( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.28 AP 00331124 2012/11/28( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 38.70 AP 00331125 2012/11/28( FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 225.00 AP 00331125 2012/11/28( FENCE CRAFT OF UPLAND INC 629.15 AP 00331126 2012/11/28( FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC#1350 57.73 AP 00331127 2012/11/28( FORD OF UPLAND INC 433.13 AP 00331127 2012/11/28( FORD OF UPLAND INC 40.64 AP 00331127 2012/11/28( FORD OF UPLAND INC 9.21 AP 00331128 2012/11/28( GALE GROUP,THE 2,157.59 AP 00331129 2012/11/28( GAMEZ,ERIKA 105.44 AP 00331130 2012/11/28( GILKEY,JOHN 150.00 AP 00331131 2012/11/28( GIORDANO,MARIANNA 115.20 AP 00331132 2012/11/28( GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 109.59 AP 00331132 2012/11/28( GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 335.00 AP 00331132 2012/11/28( GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 3,468.44 AP 00331132 2012/11/28( GOODYEAR TIRE&RUBBER COMPANY 2,501.69 AP 00331133 2012/11/28( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00331133 2012/11/28( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00331133 2012/11/28( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00331133 2012/11/28( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00331134 2012/11/28( GRAINGER 585.55 AP 00331134 2012/11/28( GRAINGER 1,717.06 AP 00331134 2012/11/28( GRAINGER 167.19 AP 00331134 2012/11/28( GRAINGER 197.59 AP 00331135 2012/11/28( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 67.88 AP 00331135 2012/11/28( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 188.56 AP 00331135 2012/11/28( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 800.58 AP 00331135 2012/11/28( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 107.28 AP 00331136 2012/11/28( GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 316.20 AP 00331136 2012/11/28( GREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT 10.72 AP 00331137 2012/11/28( GUNBY,PETE 2,415.00 AP 00331138 2012/11/28( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 108.00 AP 00331138 2012/11/28( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 160.00 AP 00331138 2012/11/28( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 40.00 AP 00331138 2012/11/28( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 200.00 AP 00331139 2012/11/28( HANSHAW,DIANE 81.59 AP 00331140 2012/11/28( HAY, SHARON 168.00 AP 00331140 2012/11/28( HAY, SHARON 54.00 AP 00331141 2012/11/28( HI WAY SAFETY INC 3,330.44 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK AGENDA REG PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P57 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331142 2012/11/28( HIMES,MICHELE 82.00 AP 00331143 2012/11/28( HOSE MAN INC 39.08 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 312.84 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 24.16 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 158.94 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 22.75 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 22.75 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS -48.15 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.69 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.70 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 38.10 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 13.47 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 48.15 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 13.31 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 75.44 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 187.21 AP 00331144 2012/11/28( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 16.77 AP 00331145 2012/11/28( INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 33.36 AP 00331145 2012/11/28( INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC 276.57 AP 00331146 2012/11/28( INLAND OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 9.89 AP 00331146 2012/11/28( INLAND OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 24.55 AP 00331146 2012/11/28( INLAND OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY 2.20 AP 00331147 2012/11/28( INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 49.42 AP 00331147 2012/11/28( INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 44.70 AP 00331148 2012/11/28( J.G.TUCKER AND SONS INC. 80.81 AP 00331148 2012/11/28( J.G.TUCKER AND SONS INC. 290.93 AP 00331148 2012/11/28( J.G.TUCKER AND SONS INC. 242.44 AP 00331149 2012/11/28( JAN,WEI-SHU 117.00 AP 00331150 2012/11/28( JOBS AVAILABLE INC 297.50 AP 00331151 2012/11/28( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 504.68 AP 00331151 2012/11/28( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 398.37 AP 00331151 2012/11/28( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 55.00 AP 00331151 2012/11/28( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 41.47 AP 00331151 2012/11/28( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 106.62 AP 00331152 2012/11/28( JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 2,175.00 AP 00331152 2012/11/28( JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 290.00 AP 00331153 2012/11/28( JONES,CHRISTINA HAATAINEN 820.00 AP 00331154 2012/11/28 ( JT STORM DEVELOPMENT LLC 7,268.41 AP 00331155 2012/11/28( K K WOODWORKING 25.83 AP 00331155 2012/11/28( K K WOODWORKING 63.57 AP 00331155 2012/11/28 ( K K WOODWORKING 17.22 AP 00331156 2012/11/28( KENS SPORTING GOODS 2,757.54 AP 00331157 2012/11/28( KENT HARRIS TRUCKING&MATERIALS 308.91 AP 00331158 2012/11/28( KONE INC 568.60 AP 00331159 2012/11/28( KORANDA CONSTRUCTION 5,800.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P58 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331160 2012/11/28( KUSTOM IMPRINTS 246.41 AP 00331160 2012/11/28( KUSTOM IMPRINTS 793.04 AP 00331161 2012/11/28( LEWIS INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC 153,899.22 AP 00331162 2012/11/28( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 175.00 AP 00331162 2012/11/28( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 585.00 AP 00331162 2012/11/28( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 700.00 AP 00331163 2012/11/28( MAIN STREET SIGNS 118.53 AP 00331163 2012/11/28( MAIN STREET SIGNS 99.02 AP 00331164 2012/11/28( MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 518.31 AP 00331165 2012/11/28( MANSILLA,MAYRA 1,000.00 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,600.00 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 7,046.21 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 587.54 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 15,998.13 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 6,578.73 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 3,022.47 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,059.09 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 822.67 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 696.51 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 870.75 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,737.36 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 362.72 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,290.89 AP 00331166 2012/11/28( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 414.70 AP 00331167 2012/11/28( MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00331167 2012/11/28( MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00331168 2012/11/28( MASTERCRAFT HOMES 26,765.65 AP 00331169 2012/11/28( MAYFLOWER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 37.80 AP 00331170 2012/11/28( MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 107.10 AP 00331171 2012/11/28( MESA,DESERIE 10.00 AP 00331172 2012/11/28( MIDWEST TAPE 70.96 AP 00331172 2012/11/28 l MIDWEST TAPE 58.97 AP 00331173 2012/11/28( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 68.25 AP 00331173 2012/11/28( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 57.36 AP 00331174 2012/11/28 ( MYERCHIN,NICOLE 96.00 AP 00331174 2012/11/28( MYERCHIN,NICOLE 108.00 AP 00331175 2012/11/28( NAPA AUTO PARTS 139.39 AP 00331175 2012/11/28( NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.54 AP 00331175 2012/11/28( NAPA AUTO PARTS 58.92 AP 00331176 2012/11/28( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA 67.50 AP 00331176 2012/11/28( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA 85.50 AP 00331176 2012/11/28( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA 96.00 AP 00331176 2012/11/28( NITHYA, SARVASMARANA 108.00 AP 00331177 2012/11/28 l OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 320,266.32 AP 00331177 2012/11/28( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC -32,026.63 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P59 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331178 2012/11/28( OFFICE DEPOT 5,087.96 AP 00331179 2012/11/28( ONTRAC 96.93 AP 00331180 2012/11/28( ORONA,PATRICIA 860.00 AP 00331180 2012/11/28( ORONA,PATRICIA 215.00 AP 00331181 2012/11/28( OTT,LAURA 510.00 AP 00331181 2012/11/28( OTT,LAURA 234.00 AP 00331182 2012/11/28( OTT, SHARON 378.00 AP 00331182 2012/11/28( OTT, SHARON 288.00 AP 00331183 2012/11/28( OWEN ELECTRIC INC 349.04 AP 00331184 2012/11/28( PAHIA,REGINALD 57.60 AP 00331185 2012/11/28( PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 AP 00331186 2012/11/28 ( PATTON SALES CORP 82.18 AP 00331187 2012/11/28 l PAZ,LORENA 6.00 AP 00331188 2012/11/28( PEPSI-COLA 394.40 AP 00331189 2012/11/28( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 10.00 AP 00331189 2012/11/28( PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 846.53 AP 00331190 2012/11/28( PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 462.13 AP 00331191 2012/11/28( PIONEER MANUFACTURING 2,395.26 AP 00331192 2012/11/28( PIP PRINTING 326.32 AP 00331193 2012/11/28( PLEAZINGLY TASTEFUL EVENT PLANNING ANI 300.00 AP 00331194 2012/11/28( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00331194 2012/11/28( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 127.47 AP 00331195 2012/11/28( PRO SALES GROUP INC 51.48 AP 00331196 2012/11/28( PROJECT SISTER 3,220.00 AP 00331197 2012/11/28( PROPET DISTRIBUTORS INC 399.95 AP 00331198 2012/11/28( PSA PRINT GROUP 183.85 AP 00331199 2012/11/28( PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC 3,548.00 AP 00331199 2012/11/28( PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC 4,090.00 AP 00331199 2012/11/28( PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC 25,279.07 AP 00331199 2012/11/28( PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC -354.80 AP 00331199 2012/11/28 ( PTM GENERAL ENGINEERING SERVICES INC -2,936.91 AP 00331201 2012/11/28( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITIZEN PATROL 416 1,099.05 AP 00331202 2012/11/28( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331202 2012/11/28( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331202 2012/11/28( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331202 2012/11/28( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 75.00 AP 00331202 2012/11/28( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331203 2012/11/28( RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 292.75 AP 00331204 2012/11/28( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 70.04 AP 00331204 2012/11/28 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 441.56 AP 00331204 2012/11/28( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 122.72 AP 00331205 2012/11/28( REGAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS 1,092.59 AP 00331206 2012/11/28( RESOURCE BUILDING MATERIALS 638.42 AP 00331207 2012/11/28( ROBLES,RAUL P 75.00 AP 00331207 2012/11/28( ROBLES,RAUL P 75.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK; Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P60 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00331207 2012/11/28( ROBLES,RAUL P 75.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 483.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 483.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 644.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 966.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 483.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT . 960.00 AP 00331208 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 1,893.00 AP 00331209 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 443.00 AP 00331210 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 1,345.92 AP 00331212 2012/11/28 ( SBPEA 729.17 AP 00331213 2012/11/28( SEABOARD FINANCE INC 200.00 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 57.60 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 57.60 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 27.00 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 9.00 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 18.00 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 79.20 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 51.00 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 133.80 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 100.80 AP 00331214 2012/11/28( SENECHAL,CALVIN 21.60 AP 00331215 2012/11/28( SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00331216 2012/11/28( SHOETERIA 225.00 AP 00331217 2012/11/28( SIGMANET 12,446.65 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 97.90 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 2,235.01 AP 00331218 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 13.81 AP 00331219 2012/11/28( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,100.38 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,538.85 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.74 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 129.24 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.57 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225' 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P61 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name. Amouni AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.47 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.16 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.93 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.63 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.70 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.74 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 80.11 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.69 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.15 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.85 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.38 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.65 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.43 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.32 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.86 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.93 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.76 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.68 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.56 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.82 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.64 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.35 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.09 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P62 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.83 AP 00331225 -2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.85 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.47 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 411.95 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 509.70 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.17 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.77 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.06 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.47 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.59 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.75 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.34 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.93 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.57 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.14 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.95 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.04 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.64 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.41 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.52 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.15 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 188.96 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.10 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.35 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.99 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.88 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout. Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P63 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.34 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.00 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 168.67 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 65.97 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.30 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.94 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.57 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.05 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 277.77 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.21 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.86 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.09 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.35 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. 110.28 AP 00331225 20.12/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 684.65 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.64 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.53 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.80 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.04 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.27 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.45 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.16 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.17 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23,26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.82 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.29 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.81 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P64 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 171.69 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.67 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 597.70 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 t SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.71 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.78 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.75 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.52 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.19 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.32 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.77 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.07 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.30 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.83 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.79 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.77 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.27 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.96 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 663.71 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 332.40 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON .23.66 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 137.07 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.70 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.87 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON .23.13 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.76 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 309.82 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 84.45 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.28 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P65 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.47 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1.89 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.72 AP 00331225 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 88.01 AP 00331225 2012/11/28 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331226 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.61 AP 00331226 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.73 AP 00331227 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 5,043.64 AP 00331228 2012/11/28( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,400.73 AP 00331229 2012/11/28( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 225.00 AP 00331229 2012/11/28( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 283.00 AP 00331230 2012/11/28( SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 4,137.60 AP 00331230 2012/11%28( SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 32.31 AP 00331231 2012/11/28( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 153.48 AP 00331231 2012/11/28( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 635.59 AP 00331283 2012/12/05 ( 909 MAGAZINE 110.00 AP 00331231 2012/11/28( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 251.04 AP 00331231 2012/11/28( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 93.45 AP 00331231 2012/11/28( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 37.75 AP 00331232 2012/11/28( STEUER,MARK A 1,710.00 AP 00331233 2012/11/28( SUN,THE 229.56 AP 00331234 2012/11/28( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 10,640.00 AP 00331235 2012/11/28( THEATRICAL RIGHTS WORLDWIDE LLC 538.32 AP 00331236 2012/11/28( THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 600.21 AP 00331285 2012/12/05 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 507.24 AP 00331285 2012/12/05 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 647.90 AP 00331285 2012/12/05( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 507.24 AP 00331285 2012/12/05( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 51.16 AP 00331285 2012/12/05( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 511.50 AP 00331284 2012/12/05 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00331284 2012/12/05 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00331284 2012/12/05 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00331284 2012/12/05( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00331290 2012/12/05( ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 9.09 AP 00331290 2012/12/05 ( ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 422.66 AP 00331289 2012/12/05 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 551.81 AP 00331289 2012/12/05( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00331289 2012/12/05( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.63 AP 00331288 2012/12/05( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 17,911.68 AP 00331286 2012/12/05 ( AGILINE LLC 1,720.00 AP 00331286 2012/12/05 ( AGILINE LLC 1,600.00 AP 00331286 2012/12/05( AGILINE LLC 1,600.00 AP 00331286 2012/12/05( AGILINE LLC 1,600.00 AP 00331286 2012/12/05( AGILINE LLC 1,600.00 AP 00331284 2012/12/05 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P66 Asenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331284 2012/12/05 ( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00331284 2012/12/05( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00331284 2012/12/05( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00331283. 2012/12/05( 909 MAGAZINE 110.00 AP 00331283 2012/12/05( 909 MAGAZINE 110.00 AP 00331283 2012/12/05( 909 MAGAZINE 110.00 AP 00331283 2012/12/05 ( 909 MAGAZINE 110.00 AP 00331236 2012/11/28( THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 54.56 AP 00331237 2012/11/28( TOLL BROS INC 19,338.08 AP 00331238 2012/11/28( TOMARK SPORTS INC 668.01 AP 00331238 2012/11/28( TOMARK SPORTS INC 205.69 AP 00331239 2012/11/28( TRACEY,VAL 420.00 AP 00331239 2012/11/28( TRACEY,VAL 189.00 AP 00331239 2012/11/28( TRACEY,VAL 324.00 AP 00331239 2012/11/28( TRACEY,VAL 180.00 AP 00331240 2012/11/28( UNIQUE MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 605.25 AP 00331241 2012/11/28( UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 537.45 AP 00331242 2012/11/28( UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION&WELFARE 492.20 AP 00331243 2012/11/28 ( UNITED WAY 1.00 AP 00331243 2012/11/28( UNITED WAY 150.00 AP 00331244 2012/11/28( UPS 26.75 AP 00331244 2012/11/28( UPS 30.54 AP 00331245 2012/11/28( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 9,000.00 AP 00331245 2012/11/28 ( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 425.00 AP 00331246 2012/11/28( VASTA,WILLIAM 100.00 AP 00331246 2012/11/28( VASTA,WILLIAM 350.00 AP 00331247 2012/11/28( VERIZON BUSINESS 3,149.65 AP 00331247 2012/11/28( VERIZON BUSINESS 3,321.32 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 85.12 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.77 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 211.34 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 587.08 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.66 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 69.57 AP 00331248 2012/11/28 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.15 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 163.22 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.75 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 23 Current Date: 12/12/, Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P67 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.15 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.57 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 981.84 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 41.28 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.60 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.75 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 59.92 AP 00331248 2012/11/28( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 661.71 AP 00331249 2012/11/28( VICTORIA GARDENS 19,758.00 AP 00331250 2012/11/28( VILLENAS,FABIAN 16.00 AP 00331251 2012/11/28( VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 360.00 AP 00331252 2012/11/28( VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,477.76 AP 00331253 2012/11/28( VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 512.35 AP 00331254 2012/11/28( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 113.01 AP 00331254 2012/11/28( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 124.19 AP 00331254 2012/11/28( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 516.47 AP 00331255 2012/11/28( WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT 694.40 AP 00331256 2012/11/28( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 1,147.54 AP 00331256 2012/11/28( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 34.26 AP 00331256 2012/11/28( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 42.67 AP 00331257 2012/11/28( WEST PAYMENT CENTER 4,410.12 AP 00331258 2012/11/28( WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 2,133.64 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 725.00 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145:00 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00331259 2012/11/28( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 145.00 AP 00331260 2012/11/28( YEAW&ASSOCIATES,JOHN 13180 AP 00331261 2012/11/28( ZEE MEDICAL INC 313.17 AP 00331262 2012/11/28 l ZIRGES,ARLENE 105.00 AP 00331291 2012/12/05( ANTHEM BLUE CROSS 136,640.73 AP 00331292 2012/12/05 t ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00331292 2012/12/05 ( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00331293 2012/12/05( ASSI SECURITY 135.00 AP 00331293 2012/12/05( ASSI SECURITY 985.00 AP 00331294 2012/12/05( BRAMBILA,RUBEN 5,833.33 AP 00331296 2012/12/05( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 537.22 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 24 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P68 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331299 2012/12/05( CBIZ ACCOUNTING TAX&ADVISORY OF OR-AN 1,100.00 AP 00331303 2012/12/05( CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 15.09 AP 00331310 2012/12/05( DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 426.00 AP 00331309 2012/12/05 l D&D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP 00331308 2012/12/05( CPRS 165.00 AP 00331308 2012/12/05( CPRS 150.00 AP 00331308 2012/12/05( CPRS 150.00 AP 00331305. 2012/12/05 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 3,095.91 AP 00331305 2012/12/05 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 4,364.00 AP 00331305 2012/12/05 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 22,862.63 AP 00331304 2012/12/05 ( CITY OF ONTARIO 177,083.26 AP 00331323 2012/12/05( GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00331323 2012/12/05( GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00331322 2012/12/05( GRAINGER 102.36 AP 00331321 2012/12/05( GOOSE,BRYAN 400.00 AP 00331320 2012/12/05 ( G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 717.36 AP 00331318 2012/12/05 ( FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,250.00 AP 00331317 2012/12/05( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.34 AP 00331315 2012/12/05( EMPIRE ECONOMICS INC 4,000.00 AP 00331314 2012/12/05 t DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 223.39 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 947.05 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 126.56 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 357.33 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 38.08 AP 00331331 2012/12/05( HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALL' 891.00 AP 00331329 2012/12/05 ( HOUSE OF RUTH 575.91 AP 00331328 2012/12/05 ( HOT SHOTS ATHLETIC APPAREL INC. 10,877.61 AP 00331327 2012/12/05( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 604.06 AP 00331327 2012/12/05( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 241.36 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.64 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 41.85 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 98.98 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 27.56 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 71.17 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 515.99 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 52.95 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1,531.48 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 385.28 AP 00331339 2012/12/05( KENDRENA,DONNA 37.71 AP 00331338 2012/12/05( KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 1,379.64 AP 00331338 2012/12/05( KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 152,556.30 AP 00331336 2012/12/05 ( J.G.TUCKER AND SONS INC. 103.41 AP 00331334 2012/12/05( INLAND PACIFIC BALLET 25,000.00 AP 00331333 2012/12/05( INLAND EMPIRE MAGAZINE 1,295.00 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1.32 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 25 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P69 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 14.69 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 5.92 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 17.99 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 29.18 AP 00331347 2012/12/05 ( MIDWEST TAPE 64.98 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 104.97 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 70.96 AP 00331347 2012/12/05 ( MIDWEST TAPE 58.97 AP 00331346 2012/12/05 l MG ENTERPRISES INC -3,764.90 AP 00331346 2012/12/05 l MG ENTERPRISES INC 75,298.00 AP 00331345 2012/12/05( MC TRUCKING 757.50 AP 00331356 2012/12/05( NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 211.52 AP 00331356 2012/12/05 ( NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 42.00 AP 00331355 2012/12/05( NAPA AUTO PARTS 6.70 AP 00331354 2012/12/05( MURADIAN,LESLIE 400.00 AP 00331353 2012/12/05( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 64.63 AP 00331353 2012/12/05 ( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 419.15 AP 00331352 2012/12/05( MITY LITE INC. 20,237.81 AP 00331351 2012/12/05( MIRION TECHNOLOGIES (GDS)INC 229.71 AP 00331350 2012/12/05 l MILANES,YIKCIA 175.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 135.22 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.80 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.48 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.05 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 600.81 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,173.65 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 219.45 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY .810.40 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 524.93 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,637.24 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,566.86 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 547.27 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 60.13 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 76.17 AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 331.87 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 6.44 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 26 Current Date: 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P70 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331385 2012/12/05( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 4.27 AP 00331385 2012/12/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5.10 AP 00331383 2012/12/05( SHEAKLEY 12.00 AP 00331383 2012/12/05( SHEAKLEY 17.50 AP 00331383 2012/12/05( SHEAKLEY 110.00 AP 00331383 2012/12/05( SHEAKLEY 35.00 AP 00331383 2012/12/05 ( SHEAKLEY 197.80 AP 00331382 2012/12/05 ( SC FUELS 13,399.32 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 14,515.92 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 12,984.71 AP 00331382 2012/12/05( SC FUELS 14,066.76 AP 00331381 2012/12/05 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY OFFICE OF THE ASSESSI 840.00 AP 00331380 2012/12/05 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 50.00 AP 00331380 2012/12/05( SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 50.00 AP 00331378 2012/12/05( SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 228.90 AP 00331377 2012/12/05( SADDLEBACK MATERIALS COMPANY INC 323.25 AP 00331376 2012/12/05 ( S.CALIF.MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 60.00 AP 00331375 2012/12/05( RODRIGUEZ,MARY LOU 3.00 AP 00331375 2012/12/05( RODRIGUEZ,MARY LOU 60.00 AP 00331374 2012/12/05( RODMAN,PHILIP 180.00 AP 00331373 2012/12/05( ROBLES,RAUL P 80.00 AP 00331373 2012/12/05( ROBLES,RAUL P 113.00 AP 00331372 2012/12/05 ( ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 533.06 AP 00331371 2012/12/05 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 34,667.62 AP 00331371 2012/12/05 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 10,388.39 AP 00331371 2012/12/05( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 8,476.90 AP 00331370 2012/12/05( REPUBLIC ITS 12,104.00 AP 00331370 2012/12/05 ( REPUBLIC ITS 3,734.58 AP 00331370 2012/12/05( REPUBLIC ITS 1,424.23 AP 00331370 2012/12/05( REPUBLIC ITS 687.50 AP 00331370 2012/12/05 ( REPUBLIC ITS 20,818.78 AP 00331370 2012/12/05( REPUBLIC ITS 19,827.04 AP 00331370 2012/12/05( REPUBLIC ITS 2,815.04 AP 00331369 2012/12/05( RELIABLE PHARMACEUTICAL RETURNS 150.00 AP 00331368 2012/12/05( REGAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS 758.56 AP 00331367 2012/12/05 ( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 112.62 AP 00331367 2012/12/05( RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 47.95 AP 00331365 2012/12/05( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331365 2012/12/05 ( RANCHO SMOG CENTER 35.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 27 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P71 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331364 2012/12/05( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.09 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.68 AP 00331364 2012/12/05 l RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00331363 2012/12/05( RAKOW,GEORGE 535.00 AP 00331361 2012/12/05 ( PLEAZINGLY TASTEFUL EVENT PLANNING ANT 350.00 AP 00331360 2012/12/05 ( PATTON SALES CORP 103.74 AP 00331359 2012/12/05 ( OPARC 396.00 AP 00331358 2012/12/05( ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 887.82 AP 00331357 2012/12/05( OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 355.00 AP 00331357 2012/12/05 ( OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 417.50 AP 00331350 2012/12/05 ( MILANES,YIKCIA 450.00 AP 00331350 2012/12/05( MILANES,YIKCIA 75.00 AP 00331350 2012/12/05( MILANES,YIKCIA 500.00 AP 00331350 2012/12/05 ( MILANES,YIKCIA 387.50 AP 00331349 2012/12/05 ( MILADELAROCA,CHRIS 66.00 AP 00331348 2012/12/05 ( MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 34.00 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 23.99 AP 00331347 2012/12/05( MIDWEST TAPE 23.99 AP 00331345 2012/12/05( MC TRUCKING 886.73 AP 00331344 2012/12/05 ( LOUIS AND COMPANY 172.40 AP 00331344 2012/12/05( LOUIS AND COMPANY 1,111.02 AP 00331343 2012/12/05( LITTLE 13EAR PRODUCTIONS 1,100.00 AP 00331343 2012/12/05 ( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 300.00 AP 00331343 2012/12/05( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 700.00 AP 00331343 2012/12/05( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,250.00 AP 00331341 2012/12/05 ( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 602.50 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.36 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 26.40 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 10.64 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 17.38 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 194.12 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 78.22 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 2.36 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 26.40 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 995.09 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 194.92 AP 00331332 2012/12/05 ( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 646.13 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 113.53 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 20.15 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 61.23 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 28 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P72 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 1,293.59 AP 00331332 2012/12/05( INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 33.47 AP 00331327 2012/12/05( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 470.33 AP 00331327 2012/12/05( HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 241.36 AP 00331326 2012/12/05( HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 286.00 AP 00331326 2012/12/05 ( HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 215.00 AP 00331325 2012/12/05( HEARTSAVERS LLC 120.00 AP 00331324 2012/12/05( HAIGHT BROWN&BONESTEEL LLP 475.75 AP 00331323 2012/12/05 ( GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00331323 2012/12/05( GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00331314 2012/12/05( DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 223.39 AP 00331313 2012/12/05( DEPT OF IND RELATIONS(ACCTG) 225.00 AP 00331313 2012/12/05( DEPT OF IND RELATIONS (ACCTG) 225.00 AP 00331313 2012/12/05( DEPT OF IND RELATIONS (ACCTG) 125.00 AP 00331313 2012/12/05 ( DEPT OF IND RELATIONS (ACCTG) 125.00 AP 00331312 2012/12/05( DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,413.00 AP 00331312 2012/12/05( DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 256.00 AP 00331311 2012/12/05 ( DELTA DENTAL 39,727.95 AP 00331303 2012/12/05 ( CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 15.09 AP 00331297 2012/12/05( CAPITOL STEPS PRODUCTIONS INC. 192.00 AP 00331295 2012/12/05( BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 121.12 AP 00331293 2012/12/05 ( ASSI SECURITY 3,130.00 AP 00331293 2012/12/05( ASSI SECURITY 335.00 AP 00331293 2012/12/05( ASSI SECURITY 105.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.52 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.96 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.63 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.22 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.63 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.99 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.98 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 85.11 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.88 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.34 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 125.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 131.79 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 29 Current Date; 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P73 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name - Amount AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.56 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.73 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.34 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 90.45 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.24 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.09 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.47 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.37 . AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.87 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.66 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.37 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.57 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.88 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.66 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 73.52 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.07 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 151.08 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,891.72 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.22 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 260.09 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 139.55 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.33 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.58 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.12 . AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 221.68 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.54 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 35.54 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 205.57 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.02 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 30 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P74 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.92 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 103.28 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,961.07 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.42 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.20 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.85 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON_ 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.54 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 361.12 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.85 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.81 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 93.69 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 133.37 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.65 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 587.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 61.71 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN'CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.65 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.47 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 153.46 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 92.71 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.92 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.45 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.84 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.84 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.74 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 141.98 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.03 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.84 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.96 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.62 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,769.29 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63153 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 31 Current Date; 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P75 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.19 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.50 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.95 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.22 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.83 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 145.10 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.74 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.01 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.40 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON. 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 268.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 182.04 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.38 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 43.18 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.69 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.80 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68.41 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.87 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.03 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.79 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.57 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 370.75 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16.68 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.95 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 267.09 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 230.96 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.00 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 213.60 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.51 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.45 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 32 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P76 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.47 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 82.43 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.80 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 22.99 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.18 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.92 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.15 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.54 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.90 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.64 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 215.02 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.83 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.50 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.99 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.17 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.13 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 34.89 AP 00331391 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 23.26 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2.90 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,802.42 AP 00331391 2012/12/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.81 AP 00331392 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 297.00 AP 00331392 2012/12/05 ( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 159.00 AP 00331393 2012/12/05( SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 2,000.00 AP 00331393 2012/12/05 l SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 2,000.00 AP 00331393 2012/12/05( SOUTHWEST MOBILE STORAGE INC 514.73 AP 00331394 2012/12/05( SOZA,ABRAHAM 50.00 AP 00331395 2012/12/05( STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 120.00 AP 00331395 2012/12/05( STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 180.00 AP 00331395 2012/12/05( STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 9.00 AP 00331395 2012/12/05 ( STATE HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA 8.00 AP 00331396 2012/12/05 ( T AND G ROOFING COMPANY INC 2,400.00 AP 00331398 2012/12/05( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331398 2012/12/05 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331398 2012/12/05 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331398 2012/12/05 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331399 2012/12/05( THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 800.28 AP 00331400 2012/12/05 l TMAD TAYLOR&GAINES 13.14 AP 00331401 2012/12/05( TORO TOWING 250.00 AP 00331403 2012/12/05( U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 30,760.11 AP 00331404 2012/12/05 ( U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,896.60 AP 00331405 2012/12/05( U.S.LEGAL SUPPORT INC. 125.66 AP 00331406 2012/12/05( UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 453.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 33 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2. . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P77 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331407 2012/12/05( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 6,380.00 AP 00331408 2012/12/05( UPS 84.79 AP 00331408 2012/12/05 ( UPS 52.67 AP 00331408 2012/12/05 ( UPS 86.83 AP 00331409 2012/12/05 ( URISA 175.00 AP 00331410 2012/12/05( UTILIQUEST 1,080.30 AP 00331410 2012/12/05( UTILIQUEST 346.25 AP 00331410 2012/12/05( UTILIQUEST 581.70 AP 00331412 2012/12/05( Verizon 36.01 AP 00331413 2012/12/05( VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 35.23 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 477.62 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 477.62 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 719.62 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.15 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 262.06 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.15 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 37.41 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.75 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 123.83 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 136.74 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 421.29 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.55 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 554.99 AP 00331414 2012/12/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 85.07 AP 00331414 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 228.85 AP 00331415 2012/12/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 79.99 AP 00331417 2012/12/05( VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 84.02 AP 00331417 2012/12/05 ( VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 49.38 AP 00331418 2012/12/05 ( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05 ( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05 l VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50:00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00331418 2012/12/05( VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 34 Current Date: 12/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P78 Agenda Check Register 11/28/2012 through 12/11/2012 . Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00331419 2012/12/05( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 161.17 AP 00331421 2012/12/05( WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT 607.60 AP 00331421 2012/12/05( WELLS FARGO BUSINESS CREDIT 651.00 AP 00331422 2012/12/05 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 270.18 AP 00331422 2012/12/05 ( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 387.90 AP 00331422 2012/12/05( WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 387.90 AP 00331423 2012/12/05 ( WEST PAYMENT CENTER 343.47 AP 00331424 2012/12/05 ( WESTCOAST MEDIA 450.25 AP 00331424 2012/12/05( WESTCOAST MEDIA 450.25 AP 00331425 2012/12/05 l WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 456.86 AP 00331425 2012/12/05( WESTERN MEDICAL SUPPLY INC 70.04 AP 00331426 2012/12/05( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 10.00 AP 00331426 2012/12/05( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 70.00 AP 00331426 2012/12/05( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 55.00 AP 00331426 2012/12/05( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00331426 2012/12/05( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 55.00 AP 00331426 2012/12/05 ( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 55.00 AP 00331427 2012/12/05 ( WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 465.00 AP 00331428 2012/12/05 ( WILSON AND BELL 200.60 AP 00331429 2012/12/05( ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 402.60 EP 00002996 2012/12/05( CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 980.16 EP 00002991 2012/11/28 ( CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 1,480.00 EP 00002991 2012/11/28 ( CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 6,925.00 EP 00002992 2012/11/28( RCPFA 9,625.01 EP 00002993 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,333,490.00 EP 00002993 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 15,051.00 EP 00002993 2012/11/28( SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 15,045.00 Total for Entity: 4,692,212.10 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 35 Current Date: 12/12/: Report;CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 16:2 P79 �, L > N c w cD } a N M M M oo r N r N Q r O T W o o o U () a) O > m N w E — d U co C 7 O I o U mY o C m 0 m -O O O w � E a Ix t o o r ci m LU 0 0 (� p E a 0 a� c t (D «L n To rn 0) aci~ T r N T m E ui O O O O C'= O C a .N N > .L n O X Lo co H N N a N U m Q in U N a) O _ y d o O w 0 0 N N ccVi) a N C N c O � co co C L6 E E 00 0. O 'tl > 2.S c 0 = n m co 'm N O C U o'a of ri o - o 06 -0 LL L Cl)m> CO CO N LO N O a)« co O W O co C N .T. r C Aa cl o w a r a E U O = cV M v >,� w E r r U T Q' E O.j C N °3 0 aci a �0 of E 3 0 O t0N L oC C m� > co co cn C O n o °o co .O > rL> A M co co r V s a1 C _ U {F ^O Z c�+� c°Dn h cN0 O LL T:3 :E O cl o p I� n O I.L. N O N N E N O 1 ' d Lo � w� E v 0.o 0 U Mn w mNa�i ur c 'n a3 s c`a 7 � °o °o n M p c M M a) d•V N '.2 c) o o M o �, C V A E L. Cl)> ° ° wE Q of O M N L > co Lij Cl) cD @ N N O M O C T 'DO- lL M W) 0 C T O {0 O n L r O (D O a 3 M > �U m ur UN C >m m a = c0 E E N N L > O co c N 'Or- CD Z `m a o • �C c c w M T r EC U N a�'i r m C) m r- 42 c n n� O V O_ o O U Q E N N o E m m o U 5 H U 0 r ,w C 7 O m • U 0 C d O _U a m N C N Z E D a w W ,.0 g- E m O N m 0 N� (A •` o .�° C T N U>` C 01 T w 1E a) d c` V C fA �C (a C (Q O a E ° CL i C o c U a°i Lu/ w aa) t d c t �G/ m C m m �2 m m } m £ Q m .n oo u U lL c :r Z-C cn E ILI 0 m m > CL C o N C m N c O O > > U a f0 L O K — j LL U a H H U Q W —Q > I— 0) a P80 M M M In O N M M In V OD O OD I� r V LL7 ID O O Ol7 h I� O O O h_ n O d1 'C O4 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M Q r` r jp M w �V On '7 m On 1- n n OD 0 M m On 1- O o V 8 N o h h o V N � d rL O O O N N N N N N N O 0 0 N N \ M O N N N M N N M � O N O ('� ('� OO O'7 N O OO I� V V R OO o m fD 00 m On OO OO N N v v '- IL r O O O O O r �- O O O O O O O O O O .- O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O o LL M M V OD OD M 00 (4 m M OD M OO N V 0 N M V V O OD M w m Tm m m m O N m ap O V v OD CD v Ol) M N aD O M CO M CO V O O O M m OD (D O (1 tr ♦a 1� N M r 1- O N N OO1 N OO OO OD 1- O M O7 O OO O M M V o On LQ N d EL V V N O M O O Lo N w m O 0 0 o O m O o w o o o o o N O O O O O m ut N N O M M M O P� N N N O O O u7 On 1- m o V o I- w o O O O O On N r- M I M OO OO I- W u o OD OD OD u7 O N 00 r r w f- N N o o m o o V M V OO o O N N - - o M N - - N - O r r O O - - o N N - - O W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o N N o o O@D o o o o o o o o N o co 9 l a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 v o o o O o o o to o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 oU� 'O O9 N o 0 o N o N o N 0 O O o LO LO o LO O f` w O O O O O `> OO t- 21 OO OO OD t` W O OO I- OD N O OD OD O- N N O O m O O M M 00 j o N N O M N N - O W d Lo N O V I- O O M o O O o O N o o o o o o o O h o O O O O W O 1� A M V O N O V m N n O o 0 0 o h o 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O O O O O 1l O f0 Cl) M OD N M O O O N o o o o o M o o o o O O O O Oo O O O O O O r O > V It V m I- m O N N u9 O O O O O V O 0 0 0 O O O O M 0 0 0 O O O Y M M m OD OD ui o m O[) o 0 0 0 o M 0 0 0 0 O O O O V 1� O O O O O m O 0 Lo N m w m m O O m m 1� o o o o o o O o o o o o o O w W o o o o o m o 0 M M m m m m O o m m m o O O O O m o m co O O o o m m o o o o o m o m M M m l7 m m O O m V V O o c On O m on u7 O u'1 O O O O m m On to O o o m o M M M M LO M r N N N V N V N On V N U� V M O M N N N N On M 1 0 N N lU N N O o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O h o o o o o O o o o o o o o o o 3 1� r 8 O O O O O O On On O O o 0 0 0 9 N o On o o o O O O N On o O O O O jp M M OD N OD N O 1- N r M w V V o V o o N O N O N m O V : N N w O f` N On V V V m On 0 m m r� V W m M_ N O m N m LO OO m V N OO OO OD CO N OD m M M V M N 1� m OD at O N 1� N (O N 1� M M cO m M On r M O[) M M O Oo 1� OD P- N On On V V m OO N m LO N Ol- 1� � M 1: 00 CO m I, OD 00 V CO m m V LO V OD m Y M Cl) N N o in o M V V M CO U- N o m Cl) o V N o Oo o N 'o N On o O N M M O N O O O O O On O ° N o c 0 On O OO O O O o 0 C On OO O c 0 c O N N M N N Lf) M N N N N V N V M LO V N N V M O V M N N N On M " 10 O E E N 0 r V d � N � °o °0 0 0 0 °o o °O o °O °o °o °O °O °O °o °o °o °o °o °O °o o °O °o °o °o °o °O °O °O °O i0 Cl) Cl) o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o M C O c v o o o o o o o o o o o o O o o O o o o o o O o o O o o o o o o o V M M o 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O o 0 C 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o O M R N N O o o o O o o O O O O O O o o o an o o O O O o o o O O O o o o O O N a Cl) M o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o m o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o ` M M O OO O O O O O On On O O O On O O O IQ O N O O O O O o Ui N c 0 0 0 0 N N CO N N LO Cl) N N N N V N V CO M r V N Vn V M O V M N N N 0 Cl) N 0 O {}�0 E O 0 N N m m 0 N CO O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O A o o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O o o o O O O O O O O O O O O O O a/� L N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N . ` On N M w V M M m On 1- On On OO w M M 1- I� O w V m M O P� r� O V O'� On m O 0 O O N N O N O N N N O 0 0 N O M O N N N O\ N N M O N / CL d M M (O m N V m N t V C V o w cO ` O ^ N N m On � o O N N V V N V O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O o O O O O O O O N d N Qm 00 O 00 O 00 U U U U U U U U Mo Y Y Y Y Y O O C7 C- C7 U' (7 � vi Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y F F F-F F F F F F- N N a ¢Z Z Z Z Z a a a Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z S S S S S S S S Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m m m m F F F F F 0 0 0 0 0 u, c/, u, u) (n u) c/,a s m m m LL F 0 0 cc 0 z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a a a a a a a >w www w a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z � � m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o F F F F F F F U U U U U J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J } 2 m mm m w w w w w w w w w w w W W W W W W W W W J J J J J J J U d LL' d' S S S F F F F F F F- y z rn a a a a a 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 a a a a a a a w ` LL LL LL LL LL 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N U d J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J Q a' a o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w U 0 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 O t0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w 'w w w W W W W W W W W w w w w w w w w J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL O � C c c y CL m > > E LL O r+ O V n m o V V OO N W OD m O M OO N M O M 0D V r N OD O N M M m V OD r- > O 1` 1` Cl) Lo OD N N On iO w o o N co co m m 0 O O 1- 1` m m o o O O M M V V N M V V V V V On On u7 h V V V V u7 N V V V V On On L O r r r r �-- '- r '- r �- r �- r �- '- r r r �- �- r r r �- r �- r r r r r > W C T V N V d N Q1 u) a Z Z Y C7 w a 0 a 0 D Q N M J Z } W I U 2 J X W W O Oo ar S N Q O a s Q d d' S J LL LL } d ' , Z ¢ U N M M M M M M W W F F F O (D ° a0 (7 C7 a a N } } N M M OD OD m m m IL jp °o y w X X } p- r` 1` n l� l� rr 1- Do W C7 C7 C7 C7 0 (7 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 � N f.7 U M M M M M M M M M M M M M M co M M h V V V V V V V OO OD OO OD co t0 Ln 0 O } O co M CO CO Cl) M M M M M M M Cl) M M Cl) M -M Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) M Cl) M co co co M M M C U J !n LL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M co M M P81 N N N N a N N N N n d M N O N O to N m M co — LL O — O O O O I W LL ♦'•• N m O co O LL A R N I co O I to O N d W r r � a 0 0 a v m coo N I- O M N V CD � O - I - NOIO Q Q Q Q � I O O O O d 4) N r O O 0 19 Q' .- O — N N y d O O M N O N p 7 M O O M V V O D� N O O h N H Y oo V O O O f. V N do 00 O O O O W O - m O 7 er N N r T y O O O O O O N O O O O 0 0 O o0 �p O (D N (D O (D (D (D > I� O) r M O O O o0 V V M O N h Y N O (no O (D O 1 O O O (n 113 Cl N to N V' V N N r O H W O , N N V � N 2 °O °o °o pp °0 0 pp � p °o- °o °o- o °0- °O o M V = CO) a 0 00 00 m 0 00 0 m O cc N L C C 0 O (o C a M C 4) C d E .O O O y d N N N O N O 0 Z m N m O O o N O O N N N O O M N O N N V a d 0 0 rn 0 ao 0 0 0 0 0 rn v ccoo o Cl m c m` A m Lsi U La n > A a EE (q m n W o m M 0 p c Z Z Z N Q Z U Q Q Q Q F FU-• FU- H < Q U W M: Ix d Q Q Q rn U W rn rn Z Z Z z Q N J J J ; r 99999 Q W � Q a W W W '0 Z r 9 � J C W LL LL W LL o7 U O O y F z a O N c CL E o yC1 rn n ao M I�. rn - Lo Lo C N 9 7 rn y to V C N C O O N m N O r a gym = oo CL co O O N m N CL co N M u) (D •O (D (D - O U LL M M co l P82 M } ate d H Q N � U � d o a o �1 0 CL cc a p� a o 0 0 m N O N T LL V O O 0 d i0 N 10 O N > c07 Go Y N t0 O m no CD � w � m o ro > N O d N O fro N A � g � � � t O = v V O N r> o �a o v U ea N N o > O +�' L a co C C O O E oc > 0 0 0 O Z ,a a L° V a N N O Cl) N C O r (O O a > N OD Q m 10 10 g °f- z °m O LL J Q U LL O d d Y C c z A m Ch m m H _ z d W O C Z 0> � > C Q L N it C U 3 aci O m E N Q coo > y C 7 0 O d m C t0 d N A N a O a rn � a c ^°o M > u O � U a o ( > w ai o r � d o a � a � CL N n M O aN0 001 V C tb M O O n LO jp M a0 N It m M n Q1 O M O 0i It N N Q1 h N N o O O 0 0 0 O O V C 3 o o o O N h o O N LO 00 G O O C O n O n M M C E o 0 o LO o o to ri vi �i ID L o 0 01 0 0 0 m ` O O M NU� N O N r Ny 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m._ 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o O O co 00 0 0 0 0 00 oc o 0 oc A o M ` d o 0 C Ct C 1 0 00 C 0) m m y a N N Ll Lq o _ +J m M M E d d O Q. O AZ V ~ ' c4 t O co m = V r.•.� A O O O O O , O ; V C N N N N N cu m v v n co C7 N c _ _ o �_ L\V O N AO N O O O O O O 1.V � C0 N _ O O O V Q � .Q E Q O Z Y Y Y z Q Q Q z z z LL F- m m 0 o 0 o z z � w� w O O Q z U U U J J Z' U } W w U- La U 2 2 E O _ E z .3 a a a 0 0 :°. E Y Z-. § :s E a QQ JJQ QQJ Q JQ QJQ a (/� a a a ~ `W N Q fA W W W W w L z N (A O O w w a.+ O N C OJ LL LL LL LL LL c => Cp G C o C CL a1 7 V E LL o a+ O U O N 0) O Q co > 0 O O QI aD N C E O d r o _ •' 7 O rn V1 C N ICO IA T N T y N O N V m C Q� 01 1n Q o 0 0 ' z L o CL Q o Y Y Y cUp Q C o .5 y V � M M Cl) M M > N C 0 M M M M M U 0 Q) LL m M M M v) fA N P84 u1 N X r r n Q c0 O V N N 0 m M M (D O O O 00 00 O M O O M O_ O CO (O O O tl- (n N N M M O O N O O M (+ O (7 0V w N O O N r co (f N ( N 0 0) O 0) N O) N O -- N (0 r- N N r r C tD O f` r 00 V M W 00 LO CD V Cl)N 000 W M O v O N w N n r C') U) O O C O (DI N N l0 CO O 0 C U j E (» (» E» (» (n (» t» (» va (n en w E» (n C COI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 o m 0 0 0 0 °o °o o °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 @ - U y ' Cc z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z o E O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N (0 )0 N N N N n N N N 0 O O O O O O N O O W N N N Q N N N N N N N N N N N O Q m 00 00 co � � V �co 00 W W C 7 Dom' r r N r N N N N N N LL co co o0 � n M (p N N (� N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 N_ LL O O O O rm- '� 6 6 W 0) O m m a a va 0000 Z Z Z Z W °) E v v v m m m m v v v v v _0 'D v v v -o -0 v v -0 m U Q N C C C C_ C C_ c_ C C C c C C c C C C z N 4) MISS L 7 L 7 ' LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL z U LL LL LL F F F LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Z W N C O) 0) m m m m m 0) 0) ` Y ` Y Y ` Y Y Y LL Y � Y U U U U Y ` Y Y 6 � j cc ,L M l0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O ?� Q Q Q Q T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 01 CD W N 0) N 0) N N m 0 0) 01 0 0) 0) O) m 0) E O C C C C c C c c C C c C c C C C C C c m e O O O N O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N y N O CD (0 O r O O N O N O M 9 M N O N p) L d 'O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m U > C C M co co (0 M N (0 O O (D O O 00 O M 0 M O 0 M M M M LL rl 04 c C W O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M N N (� N N N N N m L U 0) m 0) W 0 M O O) 0) m 0) O) 0) 0) N (0 N (0 Ln (0 co r 0 c O- Q O O (D (O (D M O O O O O O to O M ro M aR r2 M cco co r .- r r r '- r r r r r N 0 o m 7 2` LL E -O C 'D C (D C m m C 'O c C C 7 C C 7 7 C 7 O O) Z -O 'O 7 7 7 O 7 7 O E C 'O C LL 7 C C LL LL O U LL O U LL C E C 7 c 7 LL, 7 7 x x u u X U U X 7 C 7 U U x .O 7 7 7 LL 7 LL LL LL m m U Q m U Q m LL 7 to Q CO C LL N c LL u�i Z F F Q F Q F m LL (n Q@ F 7 E m N w m LL i 7@ m n a m u Z E a) c 7 m m (nn a m w a .m Z u 0 2 2 Q Z o d o v u E •r •� v o Q) v v v m a in -0 L > N 0) 0) 0) C 0) 0) ,C m 0 'f N m C 0) C N O) O) 7 ' w 0 O_ d d O. 0) O 0. 0 O) E (n in m a cn a` cn a U a` m m O C 0 0 01 0) 0) 0 0 a d rn rn 2) rn m Q LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Ol N >N >V) N A N N 7 m > ? > � a U _ V C m m c m a E o o LL ° Y 3 a a c = @ to N m co N LL 'd N rL L W v t C Z m (D N L C 7 00 (o m 3 00 (0 - m 0) w LL M n > M N M O O W O) °� O) 00 M O O O) b O) O O 0 U) 07 O N O E C) Q 0 7 O O O O X O) rn Z Z Z Z LL LL LL LL LL U- P85 o N X `' C U C) p Or N O W 0 0 W � � N _ O _O O N O QQ M n O M ' (n V 000 (It O 0 (�O O 0 @ N 7 U') 00 N N U >I (n E C N �I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O O O Q 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m U N_ r Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q N d Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z C d N_ N N M M M M M M M M M M M M CD V) O O O O O O O O O O O O 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 Q 00 W � OD 00 a r r r N ui Q V7 i C C w d d V rn E v v v v v v v v v v v v v Z 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Q M11 eN- d LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U N C Z tl1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N LL LL L l0 N f0 m W m @ N m 0 f0 f0 (U f0 03 cc 3 d E C d d d d d d d d d d d d >d C d>, d>. d C C C C 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U >. " N U E O d tN # N O O co V (n 1- N O M O N 0 d o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d U N N N N N C C W N N N M M M (2 M M M M M M M M 'O L .u co co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C U M co M C { R V V V V V V d C Q c0 a0 W r r r r r r r r cm U 10 V L C C p d LL = C j LL E 'O U LL LL C O LL C 01 (0 C d C 7 C 7 Z N (? -O p U N 7 O LL V 7 O E C X = X X 7 a O U U X 7 U 'p U V) c FLL F co LL a) EL < Q F � Qa QU �0 Z l9 07 _O U N O. t6 [ N U 4 U 'u d d C 'U d N d d N > d C d N d C O. d a d a1 d 0 7 'C O. d 0 N (n w � O a U a (n X - a a` o O O O O d 0 0 0 c co `m m m ¢ LL LL LL m M CL c Y N d 01 N (L ¢ ¢` d 0 @ ac) w a (D m o U o 0 c E E � E U .m N o O 0 A 00 p O N N z Z O Z O LL U U P86 V) N X O 1f) c0 m V N (0 w N c0 0 n (0 to Q) n M O O) V co N O C O O M cq C' O N N O C N N n (O N (0 O OR O O i i i i i 0 O M V N N N m ' O M O N O s O { N O N. O U) M cc m N N CO (D O Ln M n (0 N ;I 0 c0 0) W nO1 m O O cc m M O) E O E U E w EA fA w 6o EA 1A Ui EA w t9 fA 6s (fl w C 'GI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —y 0 0 0 0 0 0 } 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O o 00 0 0 0 o Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cu U Ln zz zz z z z z zz z z z z z z z z zz z zz z z z z z z z z z z z z d (p N N N N N N 0 0) c0 [0 0 (0 n n n 0 O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 10 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N O N N N N N U % N N N Q Q N N N - N " N ` Q Q Q N Q1 Q W ro 00 i= n n r n n M M M M M M N �N� N N N N N a CL rn rn rn rn rn rn co m .= .= .= .= n — .- — .- — - — — - r U U- of W_ Q N i C G W d d v v v E v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v _0 v v v -0 '0 Q N cc C C C C C C C C C C C G C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Z N d 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Q u LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL U. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Z LL. N @ Cw M l9 (U l0 @ (6 l0 N 10 (0 N l9 (6 l0 N 16 N lU f0 10 10 (0 10 W d 10 W lU (0 O 3 d T T T T U L E p O FF 0 d W L # C > C T T T N T N> T T T C T N T N C T N T T N T C C T T C T W T T C T T c C C C C C C C O C O C C C C C C C c O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M = O O O O O O O O O O O O O T co O O) Lo O M 'V' N O O N O O O O ON ) O O O O O O O o O O O O y T (0.(0 0 V V N LO N L co U > C C N N N N M M M Cl) M n N N N M7 O W o W W N w 0 Cl) 0) 0) C d Co M M Cl) M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O O o 0 0 0 0 O O O Q O 00 O co 00 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U c v Li Li v C O d LL j x x j 0 LL U Li 'p C C LL F'- F LL 'O C C 'O C C U C v 07 G d C C 7 7 d d C 7 C 7 C C 7 C 7 a 7 C E Z LL N O LL U u" N U 'O 'u v N LL C LL v O OU C Li O LL O U U LL E c x 2 o u u c 1n d c d c m x 7 0 0 tt�� u 7 c v m v ° m 7 c 7 7 N U 0. a O d d 7 O_ 7 d M LL . 7 U a LL a N LL O V7 u H a LL Q LL a w (A LL (n LL W F- d a LL a d 0 >. F- a u T n a m m m a Q a m E u a a Z 'v_ u m N a Q U N N C d 'c 'U a) 'O 'O "O _0 'O "O U N d ID w > d N E c 'O C c c C C C d 1n -0 'O Q) C Q a) a .0 0} O. d U� O. d d O) v d O O O O O O a d d M X 0 a 5 a s m m m m m m U) W a S a a s (n LL (n a O C O O O 0 0 d p O m O m t0 Q LL LL LL LL LL wy Ln N w N # W � m co 0 LU # # U) m N d N N v d 7 Q a (0 >O LL' d C 3 ( C 7 d p U) w E E n d > L N _0 c O O U C (0 Cl a m C E m E E Y > a N 0 O O O O co O O O O O o N N N N ° o Z Z z Z z U LL L U U P87 to N X �- 0 U 0 0 0 0 C M co M Q O r- o 0 o r 0 0 �/ .. m r m Q r°� Z d 0 0 C 0 7I E O m m U ) U) E C N v_I 000 00 rn } o °o °o, °o o Q 0 0 0 0 0 m U co_ LL rO. Q Q Q Q Q N Q Z Z Z Z Z E o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q L ml N N N N 0 0 0 � � N to N N h (� c - - - - U IL — LL W_ Q i C C C W 0 E U d v v v v v E Q Z U) c c c c c 0) > > > > > a Q u N j LL LL LL LL LL C Z N LL N C Y Y Y Y CL-1 LL L M � m N _ E 3 m w C C C C C O d 0 '2 V N O V) 01 to h cO m > c m a c S W o co M M `M" E o L u rn rn 0 m A C u 0 0 0 0 « O L O Q w M � m O m -o m O G m c a LL E L` m c f E Z 0 m c D 'o LL m E o m o u E fA O Q w Q Q �' m u T m i5 l9 u Q c 0 u m w �.'c o Q U d O C L L m Q Z L 0 C L N 7 m Q G a ~ Q U U) m LL Y F m fn c F O z E m W m F- 0 W C c z_ E m z > Z >c Q _ •N N Q t U 1- J Q F O 0 Z F- r P§§ m � > m a § := 9- 1 $ 9 < 2 w \ ° � > U 0 / / o a }� C.) ■ > R % ■ . ) / & 2 ƒ § � LU _# $ 7 m # � @ @ $ § @% kA a. �k \ \ j © \ CD . - 7 S LO E m , 0 2 / a o $ 2 § co 4 o 7 a �. _ c � © � . p E � © @ C La 0 \ / . 0 0 Z - J G � � U . 0 on o / CL £) § 9 ° c co o co > R S k e o CD c; - &ƒ w0 8 G § LO ■ Cl) k E kCD � Of - / co U) k ) § § . m % 2 CL^ \ \ \/ a / a S L - § { 5 ƒ ° % f 2 7 f 2 \ \ \ § ® »\ ¢ # $ t ) § 2 £ k £ G ± £ wo « w J P89 'C N O O N ni 7 C1 N N a n r R OD N m CL a 0 2 > CD o O LL A 3 V Cl) M a d a' t N N i IL ADO M M V O to CR t0 to I T OR O O O t7 O O M M N N O r M co I t0 W I W tq T O O O O O O O d jp t0 m t0 O O y a, °O 00 °O 00 00 M CD > °o_ o ° o 0 o_ O_ o_ 0 Y O O CD M N o O N m to ry O O O O O N N O O N R M O t0 Lc) h to N O cl O Y O O O O � N N O O tf1 V et tf1 O � C N E 0 1 d d C _� 00 00, 00 00 00 C N m °O 00 °O 0 0 0 0 C O p O o O o 0 t M a cc 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O N Lq v v LO L C E G1 d C •O O O O Z A o 0 S A t C N rt+ I.L N` a a0 V a d o 0 IM 0 c °• M o 0 0 Qm o o c Q L z C �° O Q U K LU U LL O d Of to m 7 z A LL R N Q i U) m Q d> Q ZO O LLI 9 n Z M W R O O LL O F a b a # M = N d r E C ayi m co ._ o O 0 c G H 7 O CL (D U D w V N O C o H N d � M 2 Q O V IL !A �' N ❑ U U M LL th J 1?90 Q O) n m a a CL > � o LL a d a 4) CL CL °o °o °o 0 0 0 C C C � 0 0 0 m o o 0 o o o I v Sri c� °o a ; c ST v m d3 0 N T" O N N ° N•y � O ro ° M ` d _ d � E Z H O mm 3 L �C Q o« CO Q N ~ Via° z d 4) m E d O Z w O O F to (A d N N C1 'L � y 7 U <nU) m > y C C — N Q 7 aQi U Q � w V N y d N d � t0 Q N_ V V5 d m ° U U LL P91 STAFF REPORT CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Debra L. McNay, MMC, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution which updates existing Conflict of Interest Codes for designated personnel. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On June 5, 2012, through an action by the City Council, the City Clerk was directed to proceed with the biennial review of all Conflict of Interest Codes, which is a requirement of the Political Reform Act. Due to various changes of job classification titles, job responsibilities and the deletion of various positions in several departments, the attached Resolution was prepared and is submitted to update the existing Conflict of Interest Codes for City personnel. It has been determined that the designated employees listed in Appendix "A", in addition to appointed and elected officials, make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on economic interests. If you have any questions regarding the approval of the attached Resolution, please feel free to contact me. Re p ctfully submitted, D De a McNay, MMC Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk Attachments: City Council Resolution Exhibit "A" (FPPC Model Code) Appendix "A" (Designated Positions) Appendix "B" (Disclosure Categories) P92 RESOLUTION NO. 12-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,ADOPTING AN UPDATED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE WHICH INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE STANDARD CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE PREPARED BY THE FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 80-049(J) A. RECITALS. (1) The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000,et sea.,requires the City to adopt a conflict of interest code for the City. (2) The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a Model Conflict of Interest Code (the "Model Code"). The Model Code, codified at 2 Cal. Code of Regulations Section 18730, can be incorporated by reference by the City as its conflict of interest code. That Model Code will be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission from time to time to conform to amendments to the Political Reform Act. (3) The titles of various employees and positions in the City have been deleted, added or revised since the last adoption of an updated conflict of interest code, thereby necessitating an amendment to the City's current conflict of interest code. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Model Code, attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and Appendices"A"and"B" are hereby incorporated by reference and shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code for the City. 2. Persons holding designated positions listed in Appendix"A"shall file Statements of Economic Interest pursuant to Section 5 of the Model Code with the information required for the disclosure category assigned to them and specified in Appendix"B". 3. City Council Resolution No. 80-049(J) is hereby repealed. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption,certification and signatures P93 EXHIBIT "A" FPPC MODEL CODE § 18730. Provisions of Conflict of Interest Codes. (a) Incorporation by reference of the terms of this regulation along with the designation of employees and the formulation of disclosure categories in the Appendix referred to below constitute the adoption and promulgation of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code section 87300 or the amendment of a conflict of interest code within the meaning of Government Code section 87306 if the terms of this regulation are substituted for terms of a conflict of interest code already in effect. A code so amended or adopted and promulgated requires the reporting of reportable items in a manner substantially equivalent to the requirements of article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 81000,et seq.The requirements of a conflict of interest code are in addition to other requirements of the Political Reform Act, such as the general prohibition against conflicts of interest contained in Government Code section 87100, and to other state or local laws pertaining to conflicts of interest. (b)The terms of a conflict of interest code amended or adopted and promulgated pursuant to this regulation are as follows: (1)Section 1. Definitions. The definitions contained in the Political Reform Act of 1974, regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission(2 Cal. Code of Regs.sections 18100,et seq.),and any amendments to the Act or regulations, are incorporated by reference into this conflict of interest code. (2) Section 2. Designated Employees. The persons holding positions listed in the Appendix are designated employees. It has been determined that these persons make or participate in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on economic interests. (3) Section 3. Disclosure Categories. This code does not establish any disclosure obligation for those designated employees who are also specified in Government Code section 87200 if they are designated in this code in that same capacity or if the geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction in which those persons must report their economic interests pursuant to article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 87200, et seq. In addition, this code does not establish any disclosure obligation for any designated employees who are designated in a conflict of interest code for another agency, if all of the following apply: (A) The geographical jurisdiction of this agency is the same as or is wholly included within the jurisdiction of the other agency; (B) The disclosure assigned in the code of the other agency is the same as that required under article 2 of chapter 7 of the Political Reform Act, Government Code section 87200; and (C)The filing officer is the same for both agencies. ' Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 3 of 15 P94 Such persons are covered by this code for disqualification purposes only.With respect to all other designated employees,the disclosure categories set forth in the Appendix specify which kinds of economic interests are reportable. Such a designated employee shall disclose in his or her statement of economic interests those economic interests he or she has which are of the kind described in the disclosure categories to which he or she is assigned in the Appendix. It has been determined that the economic interests set forth in a designated employee's disclosure categories are the kinds of economic interests which he or she foreseeably can affect materially through the conduct of his or her office. (4) Section 4. Statements of Economic Interests: Place of Filing. The code reviewing body shall instruct all designated employees within its code to file statements of economic interests with the agency or with the code reviewing body, as provided by the code reviewing body in the agency's conflict of interest code. 2 (5)Section 5. Statements of Economic Interests: Time of Filing. (A) Initial Statements. All designated employees employed by the agency on the effective date of this code, as originally adopted, promulgated and approved by the code reviewing body, shall file statements within 30 days after the effective date of this code. Thereafter, each person already in a position when it is designated by an amendment to this code shall file an initial statement within 30 days after the effective date of the amendment. (B) Assuming Office Statements. All persons assuming designated positions after the effective date of this code shall file statements within 30 days after assuming the designated positions, or if subject to State Senate confirmation, 30 days after being nominated or appointed. (C)Annual Statements.All designated employees shall file statements no later than April 1. (D) Leaving Office Statements. All persons who leave designated positions shall file statements within 30 days after leaving office. (5.5)Section 5.5. Statements for Persons Who Resign Prior to Assuming Office. Any person who resigns within 12 months of initial appointment,or within 30 days of the date of notice provided by the filing officer to file an assuming office statement, is not deemed to have assumed office or left office, provided he or she did not make or participate in the making of, or use his or her position to influence any decision and did not receive or become entitled to receive any form of payment as a result of his or her appointment. Such persons shall not file either an assuming or leaving office statement. (A)Any person who resigns a position within 30 days of the date of a notice from the filing officer shall do both of the following: (1) File a written resignation with the appointing power; and (2)File a written statement with the filing officer declaring under penalty of perjury that during the period between appointment and resignation he or she did not make, participate in the making, or use the position to influence any decision of the agency or receive,or become entitled to receive, any form of payment by virtue of being appointed to the position. (6)Section 6. Contents of and Period Covered by Statements of Economic Interests. (A) Contents of Initial Statements. Resolution No. 12-189- Page 4 of 15 P95 Initial statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the effective date of the code and income received during the 12 months prior to the effective date of the code. (B)Contents of Assuming Office Statements. Assuming office statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property and business positions held on the date of assuming office or, if subject to State Senate confirmation or appointment,on the date of nomination,and income received during the 12 months prior to the date of assuming office or the date of being appointed or nominated, respectively. (C) Contents of Annual Statements. Annual statements shall disclose any reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the previous calendar year provided, however, that the period covered by an employee's first annual statement shall begin on the effective date of the code or the date of assuming office whichever is later, or for a board or commission member subject to Government Code section 87302.6, the day after the closing date of the most recent statement filed by the member pursuant to 2 Cal. Code Regs. section 18754. (D) Contents of Leaving Office Statements. Leaving office statements shall disclose reportable investments, interests in real property, income and business positions held or received during the period between the closing date of the last statement filed and the date of leaving office. (7)Section 7. Manner of Reporting. Statements of economic interests shall be made on forms prescribed by the Fair Political Practices Commission and supplied by the agency, and shall contain the following information: (A) Investments and Real Property Disclosure. When an investment or an interest in real property3 is required to be reported,4 the statement shall contain the following: 1. A statement of the nature of the investment or interest; 2. The name of the business entity in which each investment is held, and a general description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged; 3. The address or other precise location of the real property; 4. A statement whether the fair market value of the investment or interest in real property equals or exceeds two thousand dollars($2,000),exceeds ten thousand dollars($10,000),exceeds one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), or exceeds one million dollars ($1,000,000). (B) Personal Income Disclosure. When personal income is required to be reported,5 the statement shall contain: 1.The name and address of each source of income aggregating five hundred dollars($500) or more in value, or fifty dollars ($50) or more in value if the income was a gift, and a general description of the business activity, if any, of each source; Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 5 of 15 P96 2.A statement whether the aggregate value of income from each source,or in the case of a loan, the highest amount owed to each source,was one thousand dollars($1,000)or less, greater than one thousand dollars($1,000),greaterthan ten thousand dollars($10,000),orgreaterthan one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); 3. A description of the consideration, if any, for which the income was received; 4. In the case of a gift, the name, address and business activity of the donor and any intermediary through which the gift was made; a description of the gift; the amount or value of the gift; and the date on which the gift was received; 5. In the case of a loan, the annual interest rate and the security, if any, given for the loan and the term of the loan. (C)Business Entity Income Disclosure.When income of a business entity, including income of a sole proprietorship, is required to be reported,s the statement shall contain: 1.The name,address,and general description of the business activity of the business entity; 2. The name of every person from whom the business entity received payments if the filer's pro rata share of gross receipts from such person was equal to or greater than ten thousand dollars ($10,000). (D) Business Position Disclosure. When business positions are required to be reported, a designated employee shall list the name and address of each business entity in which he or she is a director,officer, partner,trustee,employee,or in which he or she holds any position of management, a description of the business activity in which the business entity is engaged, and the designated employee's position with the business entity. (E) Acquisition or Disposal During Reporting Period. In the case of an annual or leaving office statement, if an investment or an interest in real property was partially or wholly acquired or disposed of during the period covered by the statement, the statement shall contain the date of acquisition or disposal. (8) Section 8. Prohibition on Receipt of Honoraria. (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency,shall accept any honorarium from any source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests.This section shall not apply to any part time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (a), (b), and (c) of Government Code section 89501 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. This section shall not limit or prohibit payments,advances,or reimbursements for travel and related lodging and subsistence authorized by Government Code section 89506. (8.1) Section 8.1 Prohibition on Receipt of Gifts in Excess of$420. (A) No member of a state board or commission, and no designated employee of a state or local government agency, shall accept gifts with a total value of more than$420 in a calendar year from any single source, if the member or employee would be required to report the receipt of income or gifts from that source on his or her statement of economic interests. Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 6 of 15 P97 This section shall not apply to any part time member of the governing board of any public institution of higher education, unless the member is also an elected official. Subdivisions (e), (f), and (g) of Government Code section 89503 shall apply to the prohibitions in this section. (8.2) Section 8.2. Loans to Public Officials. (A)No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall,from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the elected officer holds office or over which the elected officer's agency has direction and control. (B) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g)of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any officer, employee, member, or consultant of the state or local government agency in which the public official holds office or over which the public official's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (C)No elected officer of a state or local government agency shall,from the date of his or her election to office through the date that he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. (D) No public official who is exempt from the state civil service system pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d), (e), (f), and (g)of Section 4 of Article VII of the Constitution shall, while he or she holds office, receive a personal loan from any person who has a contract with the state or local government agency to which that elected officer has been elected or over which that elected officer's agency has direction and control. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made by banks or other financial institutions or to any indebtedness created as part of a retail installment or credit card transaction, if the loan is made or the indebtedness created in the lender's regular course of business on terms available to members of the public without regard to the elected officer's official status. This subdivision shall not apply to loans made to a public official whose duties are solely secretarial, clerical, or manual. (E)This section shall not apply to the following: 1. Loans made to campaign committee of an elected officer or candidate for elective office. 2. Loans made by a public official's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such persons, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans from a person which, in the aggregate,do not exceed five hundred dollars($500)at any given time. 4. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (8.3) Section 8.3. Loan Terms. Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 7 of 15 P98 (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), no elected officer of a state or local government agency shall,from the date of his or her election to office through the date he or she vacates office, receive a personal loan of five hundred dollars ($500)or more, except when the loan is in writing and clearly states the terms of the loan, including the parties to the loan agreement,date of the loan, amount of the loan,term of the loan,date or dates when payments shall be due on the loan and the amount of the payments, and the rate of interest paid on the loan. (B)This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1. Loans made to the campaign committee of the elected officer. 2. Loans made to the elected officer by his or her spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother,sister, parent-in-law, brother-in-law,sister-in-law, nephew,niece,aunt,uncle,or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person, provided that the person making the loan is not acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not otherwise exempted under this section. 3. Loans made, or offered in writing, before January 1, 1998. (C)Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provision of Title 9 of the Government Code. (8.4) Section 8.4. Personal Loans. (A) Except as set forth in subdivision (B), a personal loan received by any designated employee shall become a gift to the designated employee for the purposes of this section in the following circumstances: 1. If the loan has a defined date or dates for repayment, when the statute of limitations for filing an action for default has expired. 2. If the loan has no defined date or dates for repayment,when one year has elapsed from the later of the following: a. The date the loan was made. b. The date the last payment of one hundred dollars($100)or more was made on the loan. c.The date upon which the debtor has made payments on the loan aggregating to less than two hundred fifty dollars ($250)during the previous 12 months. (B)This section shall not apply to the following types of loans: 1.A loan made to campaign committee of an elected officer or a candidate for elective office. 2. A loan that would otherwise not be a gift as defined in this title. 3. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor has taken reasonable action to collect the balance due. 4. A loan that would otherwise be a gift as set forth under subdivision (A), but on which the creditor, based on reasonable business considerations,has not undertaken collection action.Except in a criminal action, a creditor who claims that a loan is not a gift on the basis of this paragraph has the burden of proving that the decision for not taking collection action was based on reasonable business considerations. e Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 8 of 15 P99 5.A loan made to a debtor who has filed for bankruptcy and the loan is ultimately discharged in bankruptcy. (C)Nothing in this section shall exempt any person from any other provisions of Title 9 of the Government Code. (9) Section 9. Disqualification. No designated employee shall make, participate in making,or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence the making of any governmental decision which he or she knows or has reason to know will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally,on the official or a member of his/her immediate family or on: (A)Any business entity in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect investment worth two thousand dollars ($2,000)or more; (B)Any real property in which the designated employee has a direct or indirect interest worth two thousand dollars ($2,000)or more; (C) Any source of income, other than gifts and other than loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating five hundred dollars ($500) or more in value provided to, received by or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made; (D) Any business entity in which the designated employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management; or (E)Any donor of,or any intermediary or agent for a donor of,a gift or gifts aggregating$420 or more provided to, received by,or promised to the designated employee within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (9.3)Section 9.3. Legally Required Participation. No designated employee shall be prevented from making or participating in the making of any decision to the extent his or her participation is legally required for the decision to be made.The fact that the vote of a designated employee who is on a voting body is needed to break a tie does not make his or her participation legally required for purposes of this section. (9.5)Section 9.5. Disqualification of State Officers and Employees. In addition to the general disqualification provisions of section 9, no state administrative official shall make, participate in making, or use his or her official position to influence any governmental decision directly relating to any contract where the state administrative official knows or has reason to know that any party to the contract is a person with whom the state administrative official, or any member of his or her immediate family has, within 12 months prior to the time when the official action is to be taken: (A)Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public, regarding any investment or interest in real property; or (B)Engaged in a business transaction or transactions on terms not available to members of the public regarding the rendering of goods or services totaling in value one thousand dollars ($1,000)or more. " Resolution No. 12-189- Page 9 of 15 Pi 00 (10) Section 10. Disclosure of Disqualifying Interest. When a designated employee determines that he or she should not make a governmental decision because he or she has a disqualifying interest in it, the determination not to act may be accompanied by disclosure of the disqualifying interest. (11) Section 11. Assistance of the Commission and Counsel. Any designated employee who is unsure of his or her duties under this code may request assistance from the Fair Political Practices Commission pursuant to Government Code section 83114 and 2 Cal. Code Regs. sections 18329 and 18329.5 or from the attorney for his or her agency, provided that nothing in this section requires the attorney for the agency to issue anyformal or informal opinion. (12)Section 12. Violations. This code has the force and effect of law. Designated employees violating any provision of this code are subject to the administrative, criminal and civil sanctions provided in the Political Reform Act, Government Code sections 81000—91014. In addition,a decision in relation to which a violation of the disqualification provisions of this code or of Government Code section 87100 or 87450 has occurred may be set aside as void pursuant to Government Code section 91003. NOTE: Authority cited: Section 83112, Government Code. Reference: Sections 87103(e), 87300 87302, 89501, 89502 and 89503, Government Code. 1 Designated employees who are required to file statements of economic interests under any other agency's conflict of interest code,or under article 2 fora different jurisdiction,may expand their statement of economic interests to cover reportable interests in both jurisdictions,and file copies of this expanded statement with both entities in lieu of filing separate and distinct statements, provided that each copy of such expanded statement filed in place of an original is signed and verified by the designated employee as if it were an original.See Government Code section 81004. 2See Government Code section 81010 and 2 Cal.Code of Regs.section 18115 for the duties of filing officers and persons in agencies who make and retain copies of statements and forward the originals to the filing officer. 3For the purpose of disclosure only (not disqualification), an interest in real property does not include the principal residence of the filer. °Investments and interests in real property which have a fair market value of less than $2,000 are not investments and interests in real property within the meaning of the Political Reform Act. However, investments or interests in real property of an individual include those held by the individual's spouse and dependent children as well as a pro rata share of any investment or interest in real property of any business entity or trust in which the individual, spouse and dependent children own, in the aggregate,a direct, indirect or beneficial interest of 10 percent or greater. 5A designated employee's income includes his or her community property interest in the income of his or her spouse but does not include salary or reimbursement for expenses received from a state, local or federal government agency. slncome of a business entity is reportable if the direct, indirect or beneficial interest of the filer and the filer's spouse in the business entity aggregates a 10 percent or greater interest.In addition,the disclosure of persons who are clients or customers of a business entity is required only if the clients or customers are within one of the disclosure categories of the filer. Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 10 of 15 P101 APPENDIX A DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Desi4nated Position Categories Animal Care and Services Director 2, 3, 4, 5 Animal Care Supervisor 2, 3, 4, 5 Assistant City Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Assistant City Manager 2, 3, 4, 5 Assistant Library Director 2,5, 15, 16 Assistant Planning Director 2, 5, 6, 7 Assistant to the City Manager 2, 3, 4, 5 Building & Safety Services Director 2, 5, 6, 7 Building Inspection Supervisor 2, 5, 6, 7 City Attorney 1 City Council Member 1 City Manager 1 City Treasurer 1 Code Enforcement Supervisor 2, 5, 6, 7 Community Services Director 2, 5, 8, 9 Community Services Marketing Manager 2, 5, 8, 9 Community Services Superintendent 2, 5, 8, 9 Consultant: Special Counsel 10 Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 2, 3, 4, 5 Deputy City Manager/Economic& Community Development Services 2, 5, 6, 7 Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Director of Public Works Services 2,5, 17, 18 Facilities Superintendent 2,5, 17, 18 Finance Director 2,5, 11, 12 GIS/Special Districts Manager 2,5, 13, 14 . Historic Preservation Commissioner 2, 5, 6, 7 Human Resources Director 2,5, 19,20 Information Services Manager 2,5, 13, 14 Library Board of Trustees Member 2,5, 15, 16 Library Director 2,5, 15, 16 Library Services Manager 2,5, 15, 16 Management Analyst Il, City Manager's Office-position added(new) 2,5, 13, 14 Management Analyst III, Administrative Services 2,5, 13, 14 Park and Recreation Commissioner 2, 5, 8, 9 Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent 2,5, 17, 18 Plan Check & Inspection Manager 2, 5, 6, 7 Park and Recreation Commissioner 2, 5, 8, 9 Parks/Landscape Maintenance Superintendent 2,5, 17, 18 Continued on page 12 4 Resolution No. 12-189- Page 11 of 15 P102 APPENDIX A DESIGNATED POSITIONS Disclosure Designated Position Categories Plan Check & Inspection Manager 2, 5, 6, 7 Planning Commissioner 1 Planning Director 2, 5, 6, 7 Planning Manager-position added(new) 2, 5, 6, 7 Principal Librarian 2,5, 15, 16 Principal Management Analyst, City Manager's Office-position added(new) 2,5, 19,20 Principal Planner 2, 5, 6, 7 Purchasing Manager 2,5, 13, 14 Records Manager 2,5, 19,20 Risk Management Coordinator 2,5, 19,20 Senior Buyer-position added(new) 2,5, 13, 14 Senior Civil Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Senior Park Planner- Community Services Department 2, 5, 8, 9 Senior Planner 2, 5, 6, 7 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Superintendent 2,5, 17, 18 Traffic Engineer 2, 5, 6, 7 Utility Division Manager 2, 5, 6, 7 Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 12 of 15 P103 APPENDIX B DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES 1. Disclosure is required on FPPC Form 700 pursuant to Government Code Section 87200. No additional disclosure is required by this Conflict of Interest Code. 2. Reportable interest in Real Property in the jurisdiction. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule B). 3. Reportable Income, Loans and Business Positions (income other than gifts and travel payments). (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 4. Reportable Investments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule A-1 and A2). 5. Reportable Income—Gifts—Travel Payments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule E). 6. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, review or approval of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 7. Reportable investments in any business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, approval or review of the Community Development Department. (FPPC From 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2). 8. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Community Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C). 9. Reportable investments in business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase,or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Community Services Department(FPPC Form 700,Schedules A-1 and A-2). Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 13 of 15 P104 10. For consultants who service in a staff capacity with the City, the consultant shall disclose based on the disclosure categories assigned elsewhere in this code for that staff position. For consultants who do not serve in a staff capacity,the following disclosure categories shall be used. Persons required to disclose in this category shall disclose pursuant to categories A, B, C and D below unless the Department Director determines in writing that a particular consultant is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements in categories A, B, C and D. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The Department Director's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this conflict of interest code. A. Reportable interests in real property in the jurisdiction. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule B) B. Reportable income, loans and business positions. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) C. Reportable investments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A- 2) D. Reportable Income -gifts and travel pavments. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules D and E) 11. Reportable income, loans and business positions from any financial institution in which the City deposits funds, plans to deposit funds,or has deposited funds within two years prior to the time any statement is required under this conflict of interest code. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 12. Reportable investments in any financial institution in which the City deposits funds, plans to deposit funds, or has deposited funds within two years prior to the time any statement is required under this conflict of interest code (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2. 13. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase,or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) Resolution No. 12-189 - Page 14 of 15 Pi 05 14. Reportable investments in business entities from which the City purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2) 15. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the Library purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Library. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 16. Reportable investments in business entities from which the Library purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchases within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Library. (FPPC Form 700, Schedules A-1 and A-2) 17. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, review or approval of the Public Works Services Department of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 18. Reportable investments in any business entities having an interest in real property in the jurisdiction or that provide, plan to provide, or have provided within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, services within the jurisdiction subject to the inspection, approval or review of the Public Works Services Department of the Community Development Department. (FPPC Form 700,Schedules A-1 and A-2) 19. Reportable income, loans and business positions from persons and business entities from which the Administration Department purchases, plans to purchase,or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control the Administrative Services Department. (FPPC Form 700, Schedule C) 20. Reportable investments in business entities from which the Administrative Services Department purchases, plans to purchase, or has purchased within two years prior to the time a statement is required under this conflict of interest code, supplies, materials, or services subject to the direction, supervision or control of the Administration Services Department. (FPPC Form 700 Schedules A-1 and A-2). Resolution No. 12-189- Page 15 of 15 P106 , STAFF REPORT CITY MANAGERS OFFICE RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Breanna Medina, Management Analyst II/Emergency Management Program Subject: APPROVAL TO ACCEPT GRANT REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,348.00 AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FY2012 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT), AND ADMINISTERED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTO ACCOUNT 1380000- 4740 (GRANT INCOME) FOR THE PURPOSE OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES RECOMMENDATION Authorize the acceptance of grant revenue in the amount of$47,348.00 (FY2012 Emergency Management Performance Grant) into account 1380000-4740 (Grant Income)for the purpose of emergency management planning activities. BACKGROUND The FY2012 Emergency Management Performance Grant(EMPG) includes eligible emergency management planning activities that fall in line with the established goals and objectives from the California Emergency Management Agency as required. One of these goals is to strengthen planning for both intentional and natural disasters. To fall in line with these objectives, the City of Rancho Cucamonga retains part time staff to assist with the implementation and execution of the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Program. This staff position is responsible for recruiting, training and maintaining the program and continues to increase the disaster resiliency in the City of Rancho Cucamonga through education and awareness. P107 .STAFF REPORT - COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planne�� � Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer �---�- Subject: ACCEPT THE FREEDOM COURTYARD PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 12-061 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS, ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND, AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $ 226,096.64 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Freedom Courtyard project, Contract No. 12- 061, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $205,538.00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of$226,096.64. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Freedom Courtyard project scope of work consisted of the grading, drainage, removal and modification of the existing irrigation system, removal and construction of new concrete walkways, mow curbs and concrete pads, installation of a complete fountain system with vault, installation of 5 new flag poles and removal of existing lighting fixtures and the installation of new lighting fixtures for the flag poles, installation of a concrete footing and light fixtures for a sculpture piece that will be provided by others, as well as construction of footings and light fixtures for 5 granite slabs (that will be provided by others), and preparation of a foundation for bricks/pavers (that will be provided by others). In addition, Additive Bid #1 items were included to provide the Gold and Blue Star Walls. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: ➢ Account Numbers: 1272401-5650/5005180-6314; 120305- 5650/1802120-6314; 1882000-2313; 1882000-2354 ➢ City Council Approval to Advertise: March 7, 2012 ➢ Publish dates for local paper: April 4 and 16, 2012 ➢ Bid Opening: May 15, 2012 ➢ Contract Award Date: June 20, 2012 P108 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: FREEDOM COURTYARD PROJECT December 19, 2012 Page 2 ➢ Low Bidder: MG Enterprises ➢ Contract Amount: $205,538.00 ➢ 10% Contingency: $20,554.00 ➢ Final Contract Amount: $226,096.64 ➢ Difference in Contract Amount: $20,558.64 (10%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of eight (8) Contract Change Orders, including the Balancing Statement. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the Contract amount were: installing stainless steel in lieu of metal; install a new water supply line off existing mainline 30' from project; reconfigure the footings to create a 10" diameter void for granite support channels; repairing and reinstalling electrical lines which were damaged due to being unmarked and improperly installed; and, Additive Bid #1 items to provide Gold and Blue Star Walls. The Balancing Statement accounted for other minor decreases in the bid quantities. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director /sh Attachment ` Pi 09 RESOLUTION NO. 12-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE FREEDOM COURTYARD IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NO. 12- 061 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the Freedom Courtyard improvements, Contract No. 12-061, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. Pilo STAFF REPORT s CITY NL-1N AGER'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Subject: REAPPOINTMENT OF WILLIAM WITTKOPF, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON THE WEST VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL (WVMVC) DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council reappoint William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, as the City of Rancho Cucamonga's representative on the West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control (WVMVC) Board of Trustees for a four-year term. BACKGROUND The West Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District (WVMVCD) was established in 1983 in order to control mosquito and other vector populations and protect public health from illnesses associated with these such as the West Nile Virus. The District serves the communities of Chino, Chino Hills, Ontario, Montclair, and Rancho Cucamonga and is governed by a Board "of Trustees with representatives from each community and an at-large County representative. Public Works Services Director Bill Wittkopf currently represents the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the WVMVCD Board of Trustees (Board) for a term through January, 2013. Mr. Wittkopf was appointed by the Council in December, 2011 to replace City Manager John Gillison for the remainder of his term. The appointment of Bill Wittkopf allows for closer collaboration between the Public Works Services Department and the District's active programs in preventing the spread of the West Nile Virus. The Public Works Services Department is most familiar with the work and activities the District is involved in and is better positioned to be able to assist in and coordinate vector control efforts. The Public Works Services Department is typically the first agency residents contact to report issues regarding mosquitoes, bees, and dead birds and other vermin. For these reasons, it is recommended that Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director, be reappointed as the City's representative to the WVMVCD Board of Trustees for a four-year term. Respectfully Submitted, Fabian Villenas Principal Management Analyst P111 STAFF REPORT - ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO, Date: December 19, 2012 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services V� By: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Servic s,Manager Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer' Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A FIVE (5) YEAR CAPITAL LEASE WITH ANNUAL PAYMENTS OF $65,400, TO DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR A RE-ORDER OF DELL BLADE SERVER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND MAINTENANCE FROM SIGMANET, INC., PIGGYBACKING OFF OF RFP#11/12-108 AWARDED IN MARCH 2012, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1714001-5605 (CAPITAL OUTLAY- COMPUTER EQUIPMENT) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a purchase by reorder from Sigmanet, Inc., for Dell blade server hardware, software, and maintenance by ,using a 5 year capital lease agreement provided by Dell Financial Services, with yearly payments of $65,400, which will total $327,000 over the 5 year lease and will be funded from account number 1714001-5605 (Capital Outlay — Computer Equipment). All documentation related to this lease is on file with the Purchasing Division. BACKGROUND/ANAYLSIS On March 21, 2012, the City Council approved the purchase of Dell blade server hardware, software, and maintenance from Sigmanet, Inc., of Ontario, California, in accordance with Request for Proposal (RFP) #11/12-108. This hardware supports computer services for staff and the public and is intended to replace items that are at the end of their useful life. Additionally, these new systems incorporate enhanced energy and space savings features. In accordance with the City's Purchasing policies, the City is able to piggyback off of the RFP awarded to Sigmanet in March 2012 and re-order two additional sets of hardware, services and maintenance. A re-order will allow the City to maintain standardization and compatibility to support current operations and meet future demands by replacing equipment that is at the end of its useful life. Sigmanet has confirmed that it will honor the same pricing, terms and conditions as previously awarded. Therefore, Staff recommends proceeding with a re-order using the same specifications as RFP#11/12-108. All documentation relating to the RFP is on file with the Purchasing Division. Staff also recommends financing the blade server purchase as a five (5) year Capital Lease with Dell Financial Services (Dell). -Dell's lease offers a competitive annual interest rate of 1.990% that allows it to spread these payments over time versus incurring an initial outlay. The equipment becomes the property of the City at the end of the lease term for a purchase cost of$1.00. P112 December 19, 2012 Respectfully submitted, Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P113 STAFF REPORT V ' PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1 Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CiUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: APPROVE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT (CO 89-136) WITH MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTERPRISES, INC., OF IRWINDALE, CALIFORNIA, AND THE USE OF EXISTING BUDGETED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $66,000 FROM FUND 1001316-5300 (STREET AND PARK MAINTENANCE) FOR THE LANDSCAPE AND RESTROOM MAINTENANCE OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD TRAILHEAD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract amendment (CO 89-136) with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Inc., of Irwindale, California and the use of existing budgeted funds in the amount of $66,000 from Account No. 1001316-5300 (Street and Park Maintenance) for the landscape and restroom maintenance of the Foothill Boulevard Trailhead for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Mariposa is one of three landscape contractors used by the City to provide maintenance services at various landscape sites citywide. Mariposa is the contractor assigned to this area and has been performing the maintenance of the facility since it was opened. The funds ($66,000) for the landscape and -restroom maintenance were approved in the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 budget, but were not included in Mariposa's contract renewal because the restroom was closed and the actual opening date had not been determined at the time the contract renewal process was underway (prior to the beginning of the fiscal year) and was opened after the contract renewal was complete. The contract amendment being recommended will permit us to pay for the maintenance services already performed and the continuation of maintenance services through the end of Fiscal Year 2012-2013. Respec Ily su mitted, LIJA� William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:DR/kh STAFF REPORT 114 PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director By: Kenneth Fung, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS", TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1134303- 5650/1716134-0 (LMD 4R) AND 1139303-5300/0-6963 (LMD 9) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council approve the plans and specifications for the LMD-4R and Garcia Park Lighting Retrofit Project and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the City's on-going effort to reduce utility costs, Public Works has initiated a program to replace lighting fixtures in the City's paseos and parks as funding permits. LMD-4R and Garcia Park constitute the first phase. LMD-4R has a general boundary of Base Line Rd. to the north, Haven Ave. to the west, Rochester to the east, and Foothill Blvd. to the south. Under this program, the existing paseo lighting fixtures throughout LMD-4R will be replaced with LED fixtures while the existing park lighting fixtures at Garcia Park will be replaced with induction fixtures. The new fixtures will use just one third the amount of electricity that the existing lighting fixtures require. Also because the new fixtures have a significantly longer service life than the existing lighting fixtures, maintenance costs will be reduced. To control costs and minimize disruption to trail and park users, this program will only replace the lighting fixtures. The existing light posts and foundations will remain. For safety reasons, the contract will require that every paseo light fixture removed during a working day must be replaced and functional by the end of the same working day. Legal advertising is scheduled for January 3, 2013 and January 10, 2013 with a bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, unless extended by Addenda. A mandatory pre-bid job walk is scheduled at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, January 15, 2013. Staff anticipates awarding a contract on February 20, 2013. The contractor will have 120 working days to complete the work. Respectfully spbrnittedl William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:kf Attachment: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 12-192 P115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "LMD-4R AND.GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 29, 2013, sealed bids or proposals for the "LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a. form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of the " LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT". A mandatory Pre-Bid meeting and site tour will be held on Tuesday, January 15, beginning at 9:00 a.m. at the western terminus of Potomac Court. Refer to Item "O. Pre- Bid Meeting" of the "Instructions to Bidders" of the bid documents for directions. Also, Appendix item 3 of the bid documents contains two sheets showing direction to get to the Pre-Bid meeting site from the 1-15 Freeway. Attendees are required to sign in at the Pre-Bid meeting. Bids from companies that did not have a representative sign in at the Pre-Bid meeting will be rejected. PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general Resolution No. - Page 1 of 4 P116 prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. They can also be found at www.dir.ca.gov/ under the "Statistics and Research" Tab. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemployment in the area of coverage by the.joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D. When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. Resolution No. - Page 2 of 4 P117 The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.1. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including, but not limited to, a Class "B" (General Building Contractor) or Class "C-10" (Electrical Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. In an effort to go green and paperless, digital copies of the plans, specifications, and bid proposal, including any future addenda or revisions to the bid documents, are available by going to www.ciplist.com and signing up, by going to Member Login or Member Signup (it's free), then choose California, then scroll down to San Bernardino County and click on Browse Cities, then scroll down to Rancho Cucamonga and click on City Projects, then click on the Project of interest under the Title and follow directions for download. Note, copies of the plans, specifications, bid proposal, addendums and revisions will not be provided, digital copies must be downloaded from the above website then printed. Prospective bidders must register for an Resolution No. - Page 3 of 4 P118 account on www.ciplist.com to be included on the prospective bidder's list(s) and to receive email updates of any addenda or revisions to the bid documents. Be advised that the information contained on this site may change over time and without notice to prospective bidders or registered users. While effort is made to keep information current and accurate and to notify registered prospective bidders of any changes to the bid documents, it is the responsibility of each prospective bidder to register with www.ciplist.com and to check this website on a DAILY basis through the close of bids for any applicable addenda or updates. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to registered prospective bidders from www.ciplist.com. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. Questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids for the "LMD-4R AND GARCIA PARK LIGHTING RETROFIT PROJECT"" may be directed to: Christopher Gilli or Kenneth Fung Parks Supervisor Assistant Engineer 9153 Ninth Street 9153 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2730, ext. 4119 (909) 477-2730 ext. 4139 (e-mail at Christopher.Gilliacityofrc.us) (e-mail at Kenneth.Funga-_)cityofrc.us) All questions regarding this Notice Inviting Bids must be in writing (e-mail is acceptable) and received by the City no later than 5:00 pm on Thursday, January 17, 2013. The City is not responsible for questions undeliverable. ADVERTISE ON: January 3, 2013 and January 10, 2013 Resolution No. - Page 4 of 4 P119 STAFF REPORT PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Dean Rodia, Parks and Landscape Maintenance Superintendent By: Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer . Subject: APPROVE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT (CO#09-203) WITH JDC, INC. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND THE USE OF EXISTING BUDGETED FUNDS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $55,000 TO BE FUNDED FROM 1001316-5300 ($14,600), 1025001-5300 ($9,400) AND 1134303-5300 ($31,000) FOR CONCRETE REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTS LOCATED IN LIONS PARK, DAY CREEK PARK AND WEST GREENWAY PARK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012-2013 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the contract amendment (CO#09-203) with JDC, Inc, of Rancho Cucamonga, California and the use of existing budgeted funds in the total amount of $55,000 to be funded from 1001316-5300- ($14,600), 1025001-5300 ($9,400) and 1134303-5300 ($31,000) for concrete repair and replacement projects located in Lions Park, Day Creek Park and West Greenway Park, for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS JDC, Inc. is presently providing concrete repair and replacement services throughout the City as part of the "Citywide Concrete Repair, Tree Removal and Tree Planting Annual Maintenance Agreement" which was competitively bid in 2009. Staff would like to amend the existing contract to include the following three projects: repair and extend the existing ADA approved walkway around the playground area at Lions Park; install a concrete curb to support existing ball field fencing at Day Creek Park; and, the repair and replacement of cracked and uplifted walkways in West Greenway Park. While the budgets for these projects were previously approved as defined projects or operational funds by the City Council as part of the FY 2012-2013 budget process, they were not added to the scope of work for JDC, Inc. when their contract was renewed earlier this fiscal year. Adding these projects to the existing contract is more cost effective and can be completed in a timely manner with minimal disruption to the public. The contract amendment being recommended will permit Public Works to move forward with the projects and meet the maintenance improvement obligations for Fiscal Year 2012-2013. Respectfully aubmitted, ,0 William Wittkopf Public Works Services Director WW:DR/kh P120 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Manuel E. Pilonieta, Information Services Manager Keri Hinojos, CPPB, Senior Buyer Subject: APPROVAL TO AWARD A FIVE (5) YEAR LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO XEROX CORPORATION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $450,000 FOR THE LEASE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF ONE (1) LOT OF MULTI-FUNCTION COPIERS; AWARD A FIVE (5) YEAR SERVICE AND SUPPLIES CONTRACT, WITH THE OPTION TO RENEW FOR TWO (2) ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR PERIODS, TO XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES, WITH ANNUAL COSTS NOT TO EXCEED $60,000, IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUEST FOR BID #12/13-001; AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO ALLOCATE RELATED FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 EXPENDITURES FROM APPLICABLE CITY AND FIRE DISTRICT ACCOUNT NUMBERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED FISCAL YEAR 2012-13 BUDGET. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award a five (5) year lease purchase agreement to Xerox Finance Services in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for the lease purchase and installation of one (1) lot of multi-function copiers; award a five (5) year service and supplies contract, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, to Xerox Corporation of Santa Ana, California, with annual costs not to exceed $60,000, in accordance with request for bid #12/13-001 and authorize staff to allocate related fiscal year 2012-13 expenditures from applicable City and Fire District account numbers in accordance with the approved fiscal year 2012-13 budget. BACKGROUND The current City and Fire District copiers were originally leased purchased in 2006, and are now experiencing the diminished performance and increased repairs associated with equipment that has reached the end of its useful life. Copier replacements were originally planned for 2011, but that was deferred due to budget constraints. However, replacements can no longer be deferred due to increasing failure rates and age of this equipment. In coordination with the Purchasing Division, the Information Services Division submitted specifications for replacement copiers and a corresponding service and supplies contract. The Division also reviewed the City's copier fleet to identify possible efficiencies, including the elimination and consolidation of copiers. With the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency, and P121 DECEMBER 19,2012 , the consolidation of fax services into a multifunction unit, several units were able to be consolidated to reduce inventory. Also, several models were working beyond capacity will be replaced with a better fit based on current usage. The Purchasing Division prepared and posted a formal RFB #12/13-001 on September 17, 2012, inviting copier manufactures to provide competitive bid opportunities to the City. Ninety-eight (98) vendors were notified, twenty-eight (28) prospective bidders downloaded the RFB solicitation, and five (5) responses were received. One of the five responses no-bid the project, one (1) vendor withdrew their bid response due to its inability to meet the City's contractual requirements, and three (3) vendors were considered responsive. In addition to meeting the City's copier needs, this new equipment provides environmentally friendly features such as color scanning directly sent to email which reduces the use of paper. Xerox also has a recycling program for used supplies and an end-of-life management program for used equipment. Staff also evaluated the one-time purchase of the copiers versus a lease purchase over a five-year period. The prior copiers were also lease-purchased. The five-year capital lease underwritten by Xerox Financial Services provides a competitive annual interest rate of 0.50%, includes no administrative costs for lease, and spreads payments in equal annual installments over five years, with the copiers becoming City property at the end of the lease. As a common and cost effective practice, the City and Fire District has used an annual multi- function copier service and supplies contract that provides maintenance, repair, and replacement of consumable supplies such as toner, staples, and other components. Along with the replacement of multi-function copiers, the adoption of a services and supplies contract for the new equipment is requested. After analysis of the bid responses, it was determined that Xerox Corporation is the lowest, most responsive, and responsible bidder for the lease purchase of copiers with the annual service and supplies contract included together as a package. The per copy cost offered by Xerox is lower than the current costs we are paying which will reduce the annual service and supplies cost for the City and Fire District. Therefore, staff recommends that Council award a five (5) year lease purchase to Xerox Financial Services for one (1) lot of multi-function copiers, and a service and supplies contract to Xerox Corporation for five (5) years, with the option to renew for two additional one year periods, up to a total of seven (7) years, in accordance with RFB #12/13-001. The budget amount requested for the lease purchase is a "not to exceed" amount to allow for administrative adjustments based on model types prior to the final order. All bid documentation can be located on the City's bid system and is on file in the Purchasing Division. Respectfully submitted, L Sassoon Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P122 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Fred Lyn, Utilities Division Manager Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DIRECTING STAFF TO USE THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCE BOARD ALLOWANCE REVENUE SOLELY TO BENEFIT ITS RETAIL ELECTRICITY CUSTOMERS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to use the allowance revenue received from the California Air Resources Board's (ARB's) Cap and Trade auction to solely benefit the retail electricity customers of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU). BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 was signed into law to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, cut 30% from business-as-usual emissions levels projected for 2020, or about 15% from today's levels, and to implement a Cap and Trade program. The Cap and Trade program sets statewide limits on sources responsible for 85% of the State's GHG emissions, which includes electric distribution utilities (EDUs) such as RCMU. EDUs are provided with free allowances in the Cap and trade market, which equate to a tradable permit to emit one metric ton of GHG and has a market dollar value. This allowance declines over time and allows the utility to prepare for the increased costs in emitting GHG and to achieve economy-wide emissions reduction. A formula is calculated to indicate the amount of allowances allocated based on RCMU's percentage share amongst the State's EDUs. Based on this formula, RCMU is estimated to receive on average 25,000 allowances per year from 2013 to 2020. With a minimum auction amount of $10 per allowance, RCMU will receive at least $250,000 per year for the next eight years. The State's first Cap and Trade auction was held on November 14, 2012 and RCMU was mandated to auction at least one-third of its allowances in the initial auction. The November 14th final market settlement price resulted in a $10.09 per allowance cost. RCMU is required to use the allowance revenue solely to benefit its retail electricity customers in a manner consistent with AB 32. This includes increasing the amount of eligible renewable resources procured by a municipal utility to serve its retail electricity customers, and by a municipal utility increasing its energy efficiency programs. The attached resolution provides policy guidance for staff in ensuring that the use of the allowance revenues are for eligible expenditures and meet the goals established under AB 32. Respe_ ubmitted, M Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/FL:ls P123 RESOLUTION NO. 12-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DIRECTING STAFF TO USE THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCE BOARD ALLOWANCE REVENUE SOLELY TO BENEFIT ITS RETAIL ELECTRICITY CUSTOMERS WHEREAS, the California Air Resources Board ("ARB") implemented the California Cap-and-Trade Program in which an Allowance is a.limited tradable authorization to emit up to one metric ton of greenhouse gases; WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility ("RCMU") is an Electric Distribution Utility as defined in ARB's regulations, and shall receive a direct allocation of Allowances for each vintage year from 2013 until 2020 in an amount that is prescribed in the ARB regulations; WHEREAS, RCMU is required to consign these Allowances to ARB's Allowance auction for the respective vintage; WHEREAS, RCMU shall receive the revenue when its Allowances are sold in the auction; WHEREAS, subject to any limitations imposed by the City Council, RCMU is required to use the Allowance revenue solely to benefit its retail electricity customers in a manner consistent with the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 ("AB 32"); WHEREAS, Senate Bill 2 (1X) established the California Renewable Portfolio Standard which requires RCMU, subject to certain exemptions, to implement minimum targets for procuring eligible renewable resources as a percentage of total kWh sold to RCMU's retail electricity customers; WHEREAS, the ARB Scoping Plan provides policy guidance for the implementation of AB 32 by local governments using a comprehensive local approach, among other things, by increasing the amount of eligible renewable resources procured by a municipal utility to serve its retail electricity customers, and by a municipal utility increasing its energy efficiency programs; WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Utilities Division Manager is authorized to do all things necessary and proper for operating RCMU. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. RCMU shall establish an Allowance Revenue Account for the purpose of holding, tracking, and disbursing all revenues received by RCMU from the sale of its Allowances in the California Cap-and-Trade Program auction. Section 2. The City Manager, or his/her duly authorized designee, is directed to use the Allowance revenue to procure eligible renewable resources to serve RCMU's retail electricity customers. RESOLUTION NO. 12-193—Page 1 of 2 P124 Section 3. The City Manager, or his/her duly authorized designee is directed to establish a program to ensure that funds from the Allowance Revenue Account benefit the RCMU retail electricity customers, and to communicate this program to all RCMU retail electricity customers. Section 4. Except for matters specifically reserved under the Cap-and-Trade program for action by the City Council, as governing board of the City, the City Manager or his/her duly authorized designee is authorized and directed to do and perform all acts required to implement a Cap-and-Trade Program to fulfill obligations pertaining to the City under AB 32. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. RESOLUTION NO. 12-193—Page 2 of 2 P125 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: SUMMARY VACATION (V-220) OF THE BLANKET DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 56, 57, 58 AND 59 OF TRACT MAP 16776, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND FORESTER PLACE — APN 227- 693-56, 57, 58 AND 59; RELATED FILE: DRC2012-00740 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution summarily ordering the vacation of the blanket drainage easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776, generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 16776, located at the northeast corner of Base Line road and Forester Place, within the Low Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), was approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 2005. The final Tract Map recorded on June 30, 2006. This project was for the subdivision of 19 acres of land into 59 lots. Houses were constructed on 55 of those lots a few years ago along with a temporary basin within lots 56-59. The developer would now like to fill the interim basin and construct four single family residences on the remaining lots. In August 2012, the City finished the connection of the Base Line Road Master Plan Storm Drain at the intersection of Base Line Road and Forester Place. At that point, the developer applied for a construction permit to remove inlet and outlet structures in the temporary basin. City Council accepted said removals on October 3, 2012. Basin is currently being filled to allow the future construction of four single family residences. Since all the required drainage facilities related to the Base Line Road Master Plan Storm Drain have been completed, it is being requested at this time to have the blanket drainage easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776 be vacated now Section 8333 of the Streets and Highways Code states that local agencies may summarily vacate (by resolution) Public Service Easements if the easement has been superseded by relocation and there are no other public utilities located within the easement. P126 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Vacation of-Blanket Drainage Easement December 19, 2012 Page 2 of 2 On November 28, 2012, the Planning Commission determined that said vacation is consistent with the General Plan and recommended the vacation occur. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/VW:ls Attachments: Vicinity Map Legal Description (Exhibit "A") Plat (Exhibit "B") e P127 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map 15 UM DR BAK UNE 0 SffE-/ uNE t� (614SI ) N W � E S Item: .0 167 7 Title: VICIN17r M��° P128 RESOLUTION NO. 12-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE BLANKET DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER LOTS 56, 57, 58 AND 59 OF TRACT MAP 16776, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND FORESTER PLACE WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8333 (c), of the Streets and Highway Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the blanket drainage easement over lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776, generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2012, The Planning Commission determined that the vacation of the subject blanket drainage easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776, is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that the vacation occur; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject blanket drainage easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776, is no longer required and has have been superseded by relocation and there are no other public utilities located within the easement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby makes its order vacating said blanket drainage easement over lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776 , generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place as described in Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B". SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the Resolution is recorded, said blanket drainage easement over lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map 16776 no longer constitute a public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. RESOLUTION NO. 12-194— Page 1 Page 1 of 1 P129 EXHIBIT "A" Drainage Easement Vacation In the'City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, being a blanket drainage easement dedicated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga over all of Lots 56, 57, 58, and 59 inclusive of Tract No. 16776, filed in Book 320, pages 95 through 100 of Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said county. 9 OFESS/�N 5i HIE(,yj�-l< CO Z3 N®.25742 m Prepared by: LU EXP.12/31/13 z� OF CA�IF�� Jens Thielmann R.C.E. 25742 My Lic. Expires 12/31/13 0 EXHIBIT B" SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT VACATION SCALE: 1"-50' 55 N 145j jR) 151 g6 1g6�31" W A=02'48'49" \ N— X11 o�W �R� R_1260.00' L=61.88' a � N A=04 55'20" A=553'24" A=01'44'24" R=137.00' L=10.82' 56 L=4.16' L=11.77' �S Soo. 6' 3 7. 2i 156 49' A=03'10'56" L=7.61 0 Z \ 57 °: G VIM w TRACT NO. 16770 N � O 0 41" W 15o a 6 O A=8'08'53" O .� R=163.0 \ a 58 L=23.18' D A=09'24'04 icEhq L=54.15' W ( ) °= 2 R � o N Og3g'2l" T4901" W 155.16' \U) ° \ Al M.o. X320-95-100 �o 0 rn A=08'45'59" � b L=50.49' 59 3D' 13.99' � \ N 89'53'28" W A=15'12'24" 33.40' 45'06'32" E 21.21' R=270.00' \ N 64'09'06" W 72.98' L=71.66' N 0'06'32" E FORESTER o M P �o?S°HI4S' °ti9� t.j co w NO-25742 m EXP.12/31/13 � to -2 Q- ENS THIELMANN, R.C.E. 25742 DATE W UC. EXP. 12/31/13 OF CA\-\F P131 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (URA-31) FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 18806, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC, AND APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $37,807.50 FROM THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES FUND BALANCE TO ACCOUNT NO. 1129303- 5650/1026129-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Reimbursement Agreement for undergrounding of existing overhead utilities, located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Etiwanda Avenue, in conjunction with the development of Tract 18806 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause same to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The developer of Tract 18806, LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, undergrounded the existing overhead utilities along their project frontage on Base Line Road, as required by their conditions of approval. Developer is now requesting a reimbursement agreement to recover pro rata shares of the undergrounding costs from adjacent properties directly benefiting from the undergrounding, consistent with City policy. Staff has reviewed and concurs with the undergrounding cost data supplied by the Developer and the distribution of costs to the benefit parcels as contained in the reimbursement agreement. Copies of the agreement signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. In January 2004 KB Home, the developer of Tract 16454-1 and one of the benefit parcels on the south side of Base Line Road, contributed utility undergrounding fees in the amount of $139,515.00 for their 1310-foot project frontage. Those fees were deposited into the Underground Utilities Fund. This developer paid fees at the rate of$106.50/LF in effect at the time. While the actual cost of undergrounding was $324.00/LF, the pro rata share for the portion of the undergrounding across the street from Tract 16454-1 is based on the older rate, or $37,807.50 for 355 LF. Therefore, staff recommends appropriating of $37,807.50 from the Underground Utilities Fund Balance to Account No. 1129303-5650/1026129-0 for the purpose of reimbursing the Tract 18806 developer. P132 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Undergrounding of Overhead Utilities-LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC December 19, 2012 Page 2 of 2 Benefit parcels developing after approval of the reimbursement agreement will be responsible for a pro rata share based on actual costs, with interest. Properties affected by the agreement were notified by certified mail prior to tonight's Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MASNVV:Is s t , +' t It _ P133 Rancho Cucar u. .g Engineering Division r1fAC7 X8606. Full I w : 4�L4,. t y ' (Y . l7;-q NORTH CITY OF ITEM: SUBTT18806. RANCHO,CUCAMONGA TITLE: EIGNEERING DIVISION EXHIBIT: VICINITY MAP P134 RESOLUTION NO. 12-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (URA-31) FOR THE UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE ROAD, EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration an Undergrounding Reimbursement Agreement (URA-31) submitted by LVD Rancho Cucamonga, LLC, as developer for Tract 18806, for the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities on the north side of Base Line Road, east of Etiwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Developer, at Developer's expense, has completed said utility undergrounding; and WHEREAS, the owners of the adjoining properties will share in the expense of the utility undergrounding as stipulated in said Reimbursement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has on deposit utility undergrounding fees collected from a previous developer for one of said adjoining properties. NOW THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that said Reimbursement Agreement be and the same is hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto and cause side agreement to record. FURTHERMORE, the City Council hereby appropriates $37,807.50 from the Underground Utilities Fund Balance to Account No. 1129303-5650/1026129-0 for the purpose of reimbursing said developer. RESOLUTION NO. 12-195 — Page 1 : P135 STAFF REPORT ANIN,L-1L CARE AND SERVICES RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: 'Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director Subject: Approval to receive and file Animal Center statistics for the months of October and November 2012 and year to date January—November 2012 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the Animal Center statistics for the months of October and November 2012 and year to date January— November 2012. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS V The Animal Center tracks monthly statistics as a means of monitoring our Center's operations. Once approved, these statistics will be placed on the City's website. The Animal Center started October 2012 with 435 dogs and cats and 14 small mammals (rabbits, hamsters, birds, and wildlife). Throughout the months of October and November, the Center impounded and cared for an additional 851 dogs and cats and 14 small mammals. Of that number, 787 dogs and cats were adopted, rescued, sent to foster homes or were returned to their owners. Additionally, 159 dogs and cats were euthanized (23 of which euthanasia was requested by the owner of the dog or cat due to health or behavior). As of November 30th, the Center's population was 327 dogs and cats and 9- small mammals, which is within the Center's capacity for care of 350 animals. Our year to date live release placement rate remains consistent in the 80% range. ResRectful y submitted, 4 Veronica F ncher Animal Services Director Attachments: Animal Center Statistics for October and November 2012 and year to date January— November 2012. P136 City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center January 1, 2012 - November 30, 2012 Field 016cer calls —_ Assist Police,Fire,Other Officer 67 _Deceased Animal Pick Up 914 Investigate Bark 324' RANCHO - CUCAMONGA Investigate Neglect 135 Investigate Other(Inv.Bite,Inv.Aband Inv.Tethering,Muni Violations) 617 Stray(respond to aggressive and free rosining animals) 1383 Wild Animals 256 ;Other([cash law violations,patrol,quarantines,rescue,admin) V37 Totni Field Calls 6,9331 Animal 3.3cen_ses Sold Dog Licenses 9187 Animal Center Statistics DOG CAT Total Animals A. Ending Shelter Count as of December 31,2011 176 91 267 Intake(Live Animal) B.iFrom Public(stray or abandoned) 2020 1.8_14 3834 C. From Ow_nedGuardian 173 107 280 D. Adoption Returns 114 67 181 E. Returned from Foster Care 80 559 639 F. ,Other(Barn at Center,'rransfcrred to Center from other Shelter)_ 37 63 100 G. lOwner Requested Euthanasia 54 18 72 EL Total Intake 2478 2628 5106 Outcome 1 Adoptions 1150 930 2080 J. TNR or Relocate(Feral Cats,Bam Cats) 0 204 204 R. 1'ransfer to Correct Animal Shelter(jurisdiction) 9 2 11 L. isent to Foster Flame 89 602 691 M.IRescue Partner _ 419 266_ 685 N.'Reunited with Owner 503 19 522 O. Total Live Outcome 2170 2023 4193 Euthanized P. Medical(age,injured,sick) 96 391 487 Q. Other(aggressive,unadoptable,behavior.spncc.feral) 143 46 189 R. Owner Requested Euthanasia 54 18 72 S. Total Entie tasin 293 455 748 '1-. Died.Escaped,or Missing 18 77 95 U. Inventor•Error(Duplicate ID Numbersl 9 1 10 V Euthanasia Rate S-R/(H-G) 9.9% 16.7% 13.4% W.Live Release Rate(01(H-G-U)=%Live Release) 90% 78% 83% X. Ending Shelter Count as of November 30 2012 164 163 327 Additionalh.the Animal Center took in 339 small mammals thirds.hamsters,rabbits,wildlil'el of which 271 where adopted.rescued or released back into the wild. P137 City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption C_enter , Month of October 2012 ' Field Officer Calls Assist Police,Fire,Other OlTtcer 7 Deceased Animal Pick Up 1 74 RANCHO Investigate Bark 32 cUCAMONGA Investigate Neglect 17 Investigate Other(Inv.Bite,Inv.Aband,Inv.Tethering,Muni Violations) 46 ►" Stray(respond to aggressive and free roaming animals) ( I43 Wild Animals 18! i Other(leash law violations,patrol,quarantines,rescue,admin) 487 Total Field Calls 824 Animal -ceases Sold `I Ca ]Dog Licenses 8451; Animal Center Statistics DOG CAT Sm.Mammals/Wildlife Total Animals A.'Ending Shelter Count as of September 30,2012 205 1 230 I 14 449 Intake(Live Animal) _ B. From Public(stray or abandoned,wild) 2_16 150 18 I 384 C. From Owner/Guardian 1 14 6 0 20 D. A�rtion Returns 9 2 0 11 E. Returned from Foster Care 2 59 14 75 F. j Other(Born at Center,Ttmnsfcnvd to Center from other Shelter) 0 0 0 0 G. iOwner Requested Euthanasia - - 8 2 j 1 11 H. Total Intake 249 219 33 Sol Outcome 1. Adoptions I Offsitc Adoptions 12 27 5 44 Adoptions from Animal Center f 84 94 0 178 Total Adoptions 96 121 5 222 J. f TNR or Relocate(feral cats,wild animals released) 0 I 16 11 27 K. 'Transfer to Correct Animal Shelter(jurisdiction) 3 0 1 4 L. Sent to Foster Home 13 38 1 52 M. Rescue Partner 58 22 0 80 N. Reunited with Owner 54 1 0 55 O. Total Live Outcome 224 198 18 440 Euthnnized P. Medical(age,in sick) 11 41 5 57 Q. Other(aggn-csive,unudoptable,behavior.space,laral) 19 1 12 0 31 R. Owner Requested Euthanasia 9 2 1 12 S. Total Euthanasia 39 55 6 100 T. Dial.Escapal,or Missing I 7 4 12 U. Inventory Error(Duplicate ID Numbers) 1 0 U 1 V. Ending Shelter Count as of October 31,2012 189 189 19 397 P138 City of Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care and Adoption Center Month of November 2012 - Field Officer Calls Assist Police,Fire,Other Officer SI ;Deceased Animal Pick Up 68 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Investigate Bark 371 Investigate Neglect 11 brrcstigalc Other(Inv.Bile,Inv.Aband.Inv,Tethering.Muni Violations) 24 Stray(respond to aggressive and free roaming animals) 104 Wild Animals 14; Other(leash law_violations,patrol,quarantines,rescue,admin)� 359 {Total Field Calls----- -- ---- -- 622 I Animal Licenses Sold IDog Licenses_ 7851 Animal Center Statistics DOG CAT Sm.Mammals/Wildlffe Total Animals A.[Ending Shelter Count as of October 31,2,012 189 189 19 397 Intake(Live Animal) B. I-From Public(stray or abandoned.wild) 177 93 11 281 -- - C. I From Owner/Guardian 1 12 { 11 3 26 D. Ado_rtion Returns 9 4 0 13 —i - E. Returned from Foster Care 11 53 0 64 F. Other(Born at Center,Transferred to Center from other Shelter) 0 0 j 0 0 G. ;Owner Requested Euthunasia - j 1-0 3 j 1 14 H. Total Intake 219 164 15 398 1 Outcome 1. Adoptions .Offsite Adoptions I 3 { 19 0 22 Adoptions from Animal Center 106 ! 94 6 206 Total Adoptions 109 113 6 228 J. jTNR or Relocate(feml cats,wild animals released) 0 17 2 19 K. (Transfer to Correct Animal Shelter(jurisdiction) j 0 0 0 0 L. Sent to Foster Home 6 16 1 23 M. Rescue Partner 38 10 2 50 N. Reunited with Owner 54 2 0 56 O. Total Live Outcome 207 158 11 376 Euthanized P. Medical(age,injured,sick) 7 25 8 40 Q. Other(aggressive,unudoptable,behavior,space.feral) 19 2 0 21 R. Owner Requested Euthanasia 9 3 1 13 S. Total Euthanasia 35 30 9 74 T. Died,Escaped,or Missing 1 2 0 3 U. Inventory Emir(Duplicate ID Numbers) 1 0 0 1 V. Ending Shelter Count as ol'Noventbcr 30.2012 104 103 14 341 P139 STAFF REPORT f CITY NL-�NAGER'S OFFICE RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Michael Parmer, Management Aide, City Manager's Office Subject: SECOND READING TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 857 AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT A COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 857 entitled, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting a Complete Streets Program." PURPOSE On December 5, 2012, City Council conducted a first reading to introduce Ordinance No. 857 entitled, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Adopting a Complete Streets Program." This action allows for the second reading and approval of Ordinance No. 857 adopting a Complete Streets Program. The ordinance will implement the Goals and Policies of Chapter 3 (Community Mobility) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan to provide Complete Streets by providing specific implementation guidelines, principles, and practices so that transportation improvements are planned, designed, constructed, operated and maintained to encourage multi-modal transportation and promote operation. This ordinance is intended to identify and sustain existing implementation efforts that build off the Complete Streets framework and identifies specific implementation steps, performance measures, community engagement, and a multi-departmental team to focus on Complete Streets. In addition to enhancing the safety, access, convenience and comfort of all users of all ages and abilities on public right of ways, formalizing the Complete Streets Program will increase the City of Rancho Cucamonga's ability to leverage additional resources including funding and will make the City more competitive when pursuing funding opportunities. FISCAL IMPACT The adoption of this Complete Streets Program will not have an adverse effect on the general fund. Respectfully su itte l� Michael Parmer, Management Aide Attachments: Ordinance No. 857 P140 ORDINANCE NO. 857 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM A. Recitals. 1. On May 19, 2010, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the 2010 General Plan, which set forth policies and goals to encourage Complete Streets through the Community Mobility Section of the General Plan. 2. Chapter 3 (Community Mobility)of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan includes Goal CM-1 to: "Provide an integrated and balanced multi-modal transportation network of Complete Streets to meet the needs of all users and transportation modes," and Policies CM-1.1, CM-1.2, CM-1.3,CM-1.4,CM-1.5,CM-1.6,CM-2.1, CM-3.1,CM-3.2,CM-3.6,CM-3.7,CM-3.10,CM- 3.11, CM-3.12, CM-3.14, CM-3.15, CM-4.1, CM-4.2, CM-5.3, CM-5.4,and CM-6.2 to implement the City of Rancho Cucamonga's goal of providing Complete Streets. 3. Adoption of this Ordinance will implement the Goals and Policies of Chapter 3 (Community Mobility)of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan to provide Complete Streets. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds,determines, and ordains as follows: 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to implement the General Plan's goals of providing Complete Streets and to enable the streets of Rancho Cucamonga to provide safe, convenient, and comfortable routes for walking, bicycling, and public transportation that encourage increased use of these modes of transportation,enable convenient travel as part of daily activities, improve the public welfare by addressing a wide array of health and environmental problems,and meet the needs of all users of the streets, including bicyclists,children, persons with disabilities, pedestrians, users of public transportation, and seniors, while continuing to maintain a safe and effective transportation system for motorists and movers of commercial goods. 3. Definitions. The following words and phrases,whenever used in this Ordinance, shall have the meanings defined in this section unless the context clearly requires otherwise: a. "Complete Streets Infrastructure"means design features that contribute to a safe, convenient, or comfortable travel experience for Users, including but not limited to features such as: sidewalks; shared use paths; bicycle lanes; equestrian trails, automobile lanes; paved shoulders; street trees, landscaping and planting strips, including native plants where possible; curbs; accessible curb ramps; crosswalks; pedestrian and traffic signals, including countdown and accessible signals; signage, including pedestrian-oriented signs; pedestrian-scale lighting; street furniture and benches; bicycle parking facilities; public transportation stops and facilities; transit priority signalization and traffic calming devices b. "Street"means any right of way, public or private(in new construction areas), including arterials, connectors, alleys,ways, lanes, and roadways by any other designation,as well as bridges, tunnels, and any other portions of the transportation network. C. "Street Project"means the construction,reconstruction,retrofit,maintenance of any Street, and includes the planning, design, approval and construction. P141 ORDINANCE NO. 857 December 19, 2012 Page 2 d. "Users" mean individuals that use Streets, including bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, pedestrians, users of public transportation, seniors, youth, and families. 4. Infrastructure Required for Safe Travel. a. The City will make Complete Streets practices a routine part of everyday operations, approach every transportation project and program as an opportunity to improve public and private Streets and the transportation network for all Users, and work in coordination with other departments, agencies, and jurisdictions to achieve Complete Streets. b. Consistent with the General Plan,and or approved Specific Plan,every Street Project on public or private Streets will incorporate Complete Streets Infrastructure sufficient to enable reasonably safe travel along and across the right of way for each category of Users; provided, however,that such infrastructure may be excluded, upon written approval by City Engineer or his designee where documentation and supporting data indicate one of the following bases for the exemption: 1. Use by a specific category of Users is prohibited by law; 2. The cost would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable future use over the long term; 3. There is an absence of current and future need; or 4. Significant adverse impacts outweigh the positive effects of the infrastructure. C. The City Engineer will provide an annual report to the City Council listing the public and private Street Projects undertaken in the past year and briefly summarizing the Complete Streets Infrastructure used in those projects and, if applicable, the basis for excluding Complete Streets Infrastructure from those projects. e. If the safety and convenience of Users can be improved within the scope of pavement resurfacing, restriping, or signalization operations on public or private Streets, such projects may include Complete Streets Infrastructure to increase safety for Users. f. The Planning Department and Engineering Services Department shall review existing plans, zoning, and subdivision codes, laws, procedures, rules, regulations, guidelines, programs, templates, and design manuals including the Trail Implementation Plan, Development Code, General Plan, Standard Drawings for Public Improvements, and Standard Conditions to ensure consistency with the General Plan. g. The Engineering Services Department shall develop or revise street standards and design manuals, including cross-section templates and design treatment details,to ensure that standards support and do not impede Complete Streets. The Engineering Services Department shall coordinate design guidelines with street classifications and revise them to include Complete Streets Infrastructure, such as bicycle lanes, sidewalks, street crossings, and planting strips. Such revisions may be coordinated with revisions to the Development Code, Trail Implementation Plan, Development Code, General Plan, Standard Drawings for Public Improvements, and Standard Conditions. P142 ORDINANCE NO. 857 December 19, 2012 Page 3 h. The Building and Safety Services Department and Engineering Services Department shall ensure that sidewalks, crosswalks, public transportation stops and facilities, and other aspects of the transportation right of way are compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act, and shall ensure that the City of Rancho Cucamonga ADA Transition Plan includes a prioritization method for enhancements, and shall revise if necessary. L The Planning Department and Engineering Services Department shall continue to require street infrastructure consistent with the General Design Guidelines of the Development Code and consistent with the policies of the General Plan regarding Complete Streets that encourage and create pedestrian-oriented activities. j. The Planning and Engineering Services Departments shall continue to implement the General Plan Policies and goals to encourage Complete Street Infrastructure including connecting transit opportunities, pedestrian friendly commercial streets, and goals for future transportation opportunities like Bus Rapid Transit(BRT). k. The City will make training available to Planning, Engineering, and Public Works personnel regarding the implementation and integration of multimodal infrastructure and techniques. 5. Performance Measures and Implementation. a. The City will evaluate how well City streets are serving each category of Users through the following data collection and performance measures: 1. Total miles of on-street bikeways defined by streets with clearly marked or signed bicycle accommodation. 2. Total miles of streets with pedestrian accommodation. 3. Number of missing or non-compliant curb ramps along City streets. 4. Number of new trees planted along City streets 5. Number and severity of pedestrian-vehicle and bicycle-vehicle crashes. 6. Number of pedestrian-vehicle and bicycle-vehicle fatalities. 7. Track Fitnessgram data of students from school districts in Rancho Cucamonga. 8. Comprehensive Citywide sidewalk inventory. 9. Sales tax revenue. 10. Total miles of pedestrian trails throughout the City. 11. Number of truncated domes on sidewalks to support visually impaired residents. P143 ORDINANCE NO. 857 December 19, 2012 Page 4 12. Amount of air pollution (in tons) caused by automobiles. b. The City shall conduct targeted outreach and encourage public participation in its decisions concerning street design and use. Community input includes: 1. Trails Advisory Committee. 2. Park and Recreation Commission. C. The City will institute the following implementation strategy with this Complete Streets policy: 1. Advisory Group. The City will establish an inter-departmental advisory committee to oversee the implementation of this policy. The committee will include members of Public Works, Community Services Development, Engineering Services Department, Planning Department, and City Manager's office from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The committee may include representatives from the bicycling, youth and elderly community, and other advocacy organizations, as relevant. This committee will meet no less than twice per year and evaluate the City's progress and provide advice on implementation. 2. Capital Improvement Project Prioritization. The City will reevaluate Capital Improvement Projects prioritization to encourage implementation of bicycle,pedestrian,and transit improvements. 3. Safe Routes to School Plan.The City will maintain and update a Safe Routes to School Plan and continue to encourage local community member participation. 4. Other Plans. The City will maintain and update a Bicycle Transportation Plan, an Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan, Capital Improvement Program, and an approved Street Tree list and a Tree Preservation Ordinance. 5. Pedestrian Safety Campaign. The City will maintain and support a comprehensive pedestrian safety campaign. This plan engages local community members, City Leaders,and law enforcement to encourage safe walking and biking throughout the City.Campaign messages (i.e. graphic elements, road markings, signs)will support pedestrian safety efforts. 6. Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2020 Forecast Plan. The City, in coordination with SANBAG, shall maintain and update the San Bernardino County Regional Community Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2020 Forecast report to identify amount and trends in automobile air pollution. 7. Storm Water Management. The City will prepare and implement a plan to transition to sustainable storm water management techniques along our streets. 8. Traffic Sign Inventory. The City will maintain an inventory of all signs located throughout the city. 9. Staff Training. The City will train Advisory Group members and City staff on the content of the Complete Streets principles and best practices for implementing the policy. P144 ORDINANCE NO. 857 December 19, 2012 Page 5 10. Coordination. The City will utilize inter-departmental project coordination to promote the most responsible and efficient use of fiscal resources for activities that occur within the public right of way. 11. Funding. The City will actively seek sources of appropriate funding to implement Complete Streets. 12. All initial planning and design studies, health impact assessments, environmental reviews, and other project reviews for projects requiring funding or approval by the City shall: (1)evaluate the effect of the proposed project on safe,comfortable,and convenient travel by all Users, and (2) identify measures to mitigate any adverse impacts on such travel that are identified. 6. Statutory Construction and Severability. a. This Ordinance shall be construed so as not to conflict with applicable federal or state laws, rules, or regulations. Nothing in this Ordinance authorizes the City to impose any duties or obligations in conflict with limitations on local authority established by federal or state law at the time such action is taken. b. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is,for any reason,deemed or held by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, to be invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by legislative enactment,such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections,subsections,clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be held preempted or unconstitutional. C. This Ordinance is intended to implement the Complete Streets Goals and Policies of the 2010 General Plan and is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resource Code and Section 15282(1)of Division 6 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulation. 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. P145 ORDINANCE NO. 857 December 19, 2012 Page 6 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this_day of 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the_day of 2012,and was passed at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the _ day of 2012. Executed this_day of 2012, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk P146 STAFF REPORT .ra RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 (aUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Janet Walker, Management Analyst II Subject: ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION MAKING DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (JOE MUNOZ, OWNER—APN: 1077- 401-19 —ANNEXATION NO. 12-6) LOCATED ON CENTER AVE. BETWEEN FOOTHILL BLVD. AND CHURCH ST., TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT, CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS RECOMMENDATION Consideration of adoption of a resolution making determinations and authorizing the submittal of the levy of special taxes to the qualified electors of territory proposed to be annexed (Joe Munoz, Owner—Annexation No. 12-6) to existing Community Facilities District No. 85-1 ("CFD No. 85-1") and calling a special election for such purpose. BACKGROUND Joe Munoz, property owner, has submitted a proposal to construct a building addition of 7,785 sq.ft. to an existing 16,000 sq.ft. industrial building located at 7915 Center Ave., between Foothill Blvd. and Church St. (APN 1077-401-19; the "Annexation Area") and is conditioned by the City and Fire District to annex to the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) 85-1 in order to mitigate the development's impact upon fire protection services. On November 7, 2012, the Board initiated formal annexation proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") by adopting Resolution No. FD 12-050 approving an Annexation Map (Exhibit "A") of the territory proposed to be annexed and the Resolution of Intention to Annex APN 1077-401- 19 the existing CFD 85-1. This Resolution, among other things, declared the intention of the Board of Directors to levy a special tax within the Annexation Area to finance fire protection and suppression services and setting a public hearing regarding the proposed annexation to be held on December 19, 2012. P147 Annexation of Territory to an existing CFD 85-1 December 19, 2012 Through adoption of this resolution before the Board this evening, the Board will accomplish the following: • Make certain determinations as set forth in the resolution • Call for a special election to be conducted on January 9, 2013 • Authorize submittal of the levy of the special tax to qualified electors of the Annexation Area at such special election ANALYSIS The annexation of the Annexation Area into CFD No. 85-1 will satisfy the conditions of development relating to mitigating impacts upon fire protection services. Joe Munoz, property owner, is in full support of the annexation of the property being annexed. Pursuant to the Mello-Roos Act, whenever there have been less than 12 persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 days preceding the public hearing pertaining to such annexation, the vote shall be by the landowners within the Annexation Area. Therefore, in the current circumstances, the election will be a landowner's vote, the landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof of land within the Annexation Area. Joe Munoz, owner of the property within the Annexation Area, has executed a "Consent and Waiver" of time frames relating to the election. Exhibit "A" of the Resolution sets forth the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area which is consistent with the special tax levied upon all territory currently within CFD No. 85-1. At the special election to be held on January 9, 2013, the landowner(s) will be entitled to cast its ballot. The Board Secretary will then canvas the ballot, if received. At the next Board meeting, the Board will consider adopting the resolution declaring the election results and the annexation of the Annexation Area to CFD No. 85-1. If 2/3 of the votes are cast in favor of the levy of the special tax, the Board may declare the property to be annexed. The Public Notice regarding the Public Hearing has been advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief Attachments 1. Annexation Map 2. Resolution No. FD 12-056 3. CFD No. 85-1 Map P148 :. EXHIBIT 'A' arrxa►n MAPNO. a- OFCOMMUNI7YFAC/LT7-IESO/STRIC77N0 85-f " OF THERA/VCHO CUCAMONGA F/REPROTECI ONO/STR/CT - COUNTYOFSAN BERNARD/NO,STATEOFCAL/FORAIIA - : AVM-A6 AM£XATEW-IMP 9'd HL GD6V W MR&L DT4#.S AS RI.7l£ZMW OF JAC . MM MY AMWDMD"f0 ME.AWW R`WWOCEP COM"M fACXflXS.01SMICT. _ AaManr! - � o Af11i AVV-f FiD $ , fi AlS4�tlt78�t R., 1 Ld(- 1 G� ve VVITJ ti » I: . ti t �brset ' 50,W,--&W 84KA V GYX3NMad Law mookmm, R UP AY AE aff7a,CF AE SE33i'DIRY CF AE RAA7V C7.COVAM fM AQWX7lfaM. WT 9.40F 4R,IC!r AXM'114.W:ON f1£N INP BOOK 134 PAGES 19 DOWN 21 MfRfID;. - VASWE,CWA;UA l AAfl- .OIY 07 AMMM OF Sw aDWAQIO'OOa81:riICAO1tlfM . ASST,SfDAEDYO' RANa+o a><a""flvs PR916ptlA1 D6TwcT T1E6 iMr IfIS PREPMIMV BY ME DR(ArL+ER Am 5C6'ERNSION STATE OF"fDWM DA70 f AEAEB/'G1All`Y'MMT AE wpm Aw 9owc azoaVtET a-ram"wr AGp osw ID T+1 sa BE AYIEYFD TD CpIKMTY FACYAES C67ALtT AR 05 1 W IW R DW C&OUA%161 .. .. 'FDPF PAWEVMW PMA W7 CLtiEIIY OF SW EEM44V U 5747E OF C4LnMK My AMRX S BROAN.L.S.1653 'Aq-NM D Br BW 84 Vd7 OF.'MEMI4S Of SMV ABA PROZEIC7XAY-DESTRCT AT &G" MENSE EVIRES 9/39/13 .6EE7AC M171ELK IFEA OV DE DArOF 31972 BY t15 . RENTILOMW A42 MAT AMCUADY AW MEADS AE 6MPAS*W IM>AN COWCAVfY J9 O(fff5 067MCr ALI AS-1 CF)W A MtM MYAOURGA FAE fOMMMDn SWBBW44WM COWYMCOADMV LgMf=d1E ' w7YCr,aNA79Y or s11f 09wvwm Sulu OF M#M%K__ PMW.I�YAHEA:ay AT'8" CF YIPS CF A.SSESSMl4?AD CCAMOAWTY rAMBES'�WE WlS AT RICE N AE 04Ir CF AE CDWY MMOMW/W AIS IMO MG BEEN fxm L iF O7amw A som Ad TAE CU'mff or sw ,C&AZO1M : - - OB'CF "IZ AT- m N DOCK CF AMPS _ . - CF ASSESSWNr AW COASOVIY FACEOMY A6MOCM Ar PMCI< AT ME REQUEST . - CF N AE AWWfr CF ASST.SECRETARY DENNIS DAWGER . RAACWD CWUOMrA FIRE PROTECTOON DGMCT ASSESSOR-RECORDER-CLOW SPATE OF CACFORW 'CYM.NIY OF SAN so*"RDIq DDVTY l P149 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-056 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 12-6) TO AN EXISTING COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT (CFD 85-1) AND CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF SUCH TERRITORY WHEREAS,the BOARD OF DIRECTORS(the"Board of Directors")of the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT(the"Fire Protection District'), RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously declared its intention and held and conducted proceedings relating to the annexation of territory to an existing community facilities district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California, and specifically Article 3.5 thereof (the "Act'). The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing relating to the annexation of territory to the District,the extent of the territory to be annexed (the"Annexation Area"), the furnishing of certain public services and all other related matters has been given; and, WHEREAS, it has now been determined that written protests have not been received by 50% or more of the registered voters residing either within the Annexation Area or the District and/or property owners representing more than one-half(1/2)or more of the area of land within the Annexed Area or within District; and, WHEREAS, inasmuch as there have been less than twelve(12)persons registered to vote within the Annexation Area for each of the 90 preceding days, this legislative body desires to submit the levy of the required special tax to the landowners of the Annexation Area, said landowners being the qualified electors as authorized by law. NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. RECITALS The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. DETERMINATIONS It is determined by this Board of Directors that: A. all proceedings prior hereto were valid and taken in conformity with the requirements of law, and specifically the provisions of the Act; B. less than twelve (12) registered voters have resided within the Annexation Area for each of the ninety(90) days preceding the close of the public hearing and, consequently,the qualified electors shall be the landowners of the Annexation Area and each landowner who is the owner of record as of the close of the public hearing, or the authorized representative thereof, shall have one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land that she or he owns within the Annexation Area; P150 C. the time limit specified by the Act for conducting an election to submit the levy of the special taxes to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area and the requirements for impartial analysis and ballot arguments have been waived with the unanimous consent of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area; D. the Secretary, acting as the election official, has consented to conducting any required election on a date which is less than 125 days following the adoption of this resolution; and E. the public services proposed to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes to be levied within the Annexation Area are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon the Fire Protection District as a result of development and/or rehabilitation occurring in the Annexation Area. SECTION 3. BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXED AREA The boundaries and parcels of land in the Annexation Area and on which special taxes are proposed to be levied in order to pay the costs and expenses for the public services described in Section 4 below are generally described as follows: All that property and territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as said property is shown on a map as previously approved by this legislative body, said map entitled "Annexation Map No. 12-6 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map"), a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. SECTION 4. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services that are authorized to be financed from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are certain services which are in addition to those services required for the territory within the District and will not be replacing services already available. A general description of the services authorized to be financed by the District is as follows: The performance by employees of functions, operations, maintenance and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services. The District shall finance all direct, administrative and incidental annual costs and expenses necessary to provide such services. The same types of services which are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the District are the types of services proposed to be financed from the special taxes proposed to be levied within the Annexation Area. If and to the extent possible such services shall be provided in common with District and the Annexation Area. SECTION 5. SPECIAL TAX Except where funds are otherwise available and subject to the approval of the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, a special tax sufficient to pay for the services described in Section 4 that are required for the Annexation Area, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Annexation Area will be levied annually within the boundaries of the Annexation Area. For particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit "A"which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment to allow each landowner or resident within the Annexation Area to clearly estimate the maximum amount of the special tax that such person will have to pay. Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 2 of 7 P151 The special taxes shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable,this Board of Directors may, by resolution,establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Treasurer of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. SECTION 6. SPECIAL TAX ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Government Code Section 50075.1, this Board of Directors hereby establishes the following accountability measures pertaining to the levy by the District of the special taxes within the Annexation Area as described in Section 5 above: A. Each such special tax shall be levied for the specific purposes section in Section 5. above. B. The proceeds of the levy of each such special tax shall be applied only to the specific applicable purposes set forth in Section 5. above. C. The District shall establish a separate account into which the proceeds of the special taxes levied within the District shall be deposited. D. The Fire Chief or his or her designee, acting for and on behalf of the District, shall annually file a report with the Board of Directors as required pursuant to Government Code Section 50075.3. SECTION 7. ELECTION The proposition related to the levy of the special tax shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area, said electors being the landowners, with each landowner having one (1) vote for each acre or portion thereof of land which he or she owns within said annexed territory. The special election shall be held on the 9th day of JANUARY 2013, and said election shall be a special election to be conducted by the Secretary (hereinafter"Election Official'). If the proposition for the levy of the special tax receives the approval of more than two-thirds (2/3) of the votes cast on the proposition, the special tax may be levied as provided for in this Resolution and the Board of Directors may determine that the Annexation Area is added to and part of the District. SECTION 8. BALLOT The ballot proposal to be submitted to the qualified voters at the election shall generally be as follows: PROPOSITION A RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, AUTHORIZATION FOR SPECIAL TAX LEVY Shall Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory shown on"Annexation Map No. 12-6 of Community Facilities District No. 85-1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County Of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the"Annexation Map") pursuant to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the"Special Tax Formula")set forth Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 3 of 7 P152 in Resolution No. FD 12-044 to finance fire suppression and protection services and administrative expenses? SECTION 9. VOTE The appropriate mark placed in the voting square afterthe word"YES"shall be counted in favor of the adoption of the proposition, and the appropriate mark placed in the voting square after the word "NO" in the manner as authorized, shall be counted against the adoption of said proposition. SECTION 10. ELECTION PROCEDURE The Election Official is hereby authorized to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of said election. Said Election Official shall perform and render all services and proceedings incidental to and connected with the conduct of said election, and said services shall include, but not be limited to the following: A. Prepare and furnish to the election officers necessary election supplies for the conduct of the election. B. Cause to be printed the requisite number of official ballots, tally sheets and other necessary forms. C. Furnish and address official ballots for the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. D. Cause the official ballots to be mailed and/or delivered, as required by law. E. Receive the returns of the election. F. Sort and assemble the election material and supplies in preparation for the canvassing of the returns. G. Canvass the returns of the election. H. Furnish a tabulation of the number of votes given in the election. I. Make all arrangements and take the necessary steps to pay all costs of the election incurred as a result of services performed for the District and pay costs and expenses of all election officials. J. Conduct and handle all other matters relating to the proceedings and conduct of the election in the manner and form as required by law. Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 4 of 7 P153 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, SECRETARY of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 5 of 7 P154 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 ANNEXATION NO. 12-6 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES The rate and method of apportionment, limitations on and adjustment to the Special Tax shall be as follows: To pay for fire suppression services, the Maximum Special Tax in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 12-6 for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 shall be: Structures Maximum Annual Special Tax Residential 1 DU = ($154.78) Multi-Family 2 DU: 1.75 = ($154.78) 3 DU: 2.25 = ($154.78) 4 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) 5-14 DU: 2.65 = ($154.78) + {.35 (TU-4) ($154.78)} 15-30 DU: 6.15 = ($154.78) + {.30 (TU-14) ($154.78)} 31-80 DU: 10.65 = ($154.78) + {.25 (TU-30) ($154.78)} 81 — up DU: 23.15 = ($154.78) + {.20 (TU-80) ($154.78)} Commercial ($154.78) per acre + $.084 per SF Industrial ($154.78) per acre + $.102 per SF Note: DU = Dwelling Unit TU = Total Units SF = Square Foot ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT The maximum Special Tax shall be annually adjusted commencing on July 1, 2012 and each July 1St thereafter for (a) changes in the cost of living or (b) changes in cost of living and changes in population as defined in Section 7901 of the Government Code, as amended, whichever is lesser. Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 6 of 7 P155 REDUCTION IN SPECIAL TAX Commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in the Special Tax for the installation of complete sprinkler systems. In addition, multi-floor commercial and industrial structures shall be granted a reduction in Special Tax for each separate floor above or below the main ground floor of the structure. LIMITATION ON SPECIAL TAX LEVY The Special Tax shall only be levied on Developed Property. Developed Property is defined to be property: which is not owned by a public or governmental agency; which is not vacant; - where a "certificate of occupancy" or"utility release" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been issued; - which has an existing building or structure onsite; which does not have as its sole use power transmission towers, railroad tracks, and flood control facilities. Areas granted as easements for such purposes shall be subtracted from the total acreage of the underlying lot. The annual levy of the Special Tax shall be based upon an annual determination by the Board of Directors of'the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District of the amount of other revenues available to meet budget requirements. As used in this formula, "available revenue" shall include ad valorem taxes, State of California augmentation, tax increment revenues received from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and any other source of revenue except the Special Tax. The Board of Directors shall take all responsible steps to retain maximum Redevelopment Agency funding to which, by agreement, they may lawfully receive. To the extent available revenues are insufficient to meet budget requirements, the Board of Directors may levy the Special Tax. For further particulars regarding the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax, reference is made to the Final Report Mello-Roos Community Facilities District No. 85-1 for Fire Suppression Facilities/Services — Foothill Fire Protection District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Resolution No. FD 12-056 - Page 7 of 7 Pl 56 v- to v) cn ocpv- v- •1.� 0 cn Z j co Q co >, ° _ -- U- Q O N U U o — Ay AJJay:D (D ..,. a) CL cn cQ Q L 3 cu r LL i U_ Q WAft !AV epUeMI13 Ay epUeMI13 1 0 1 V i 18 �aaJo ea Ay Jajsayoo�j ny JaIsauo0�1 r• i Ay U@�!II!w ------------- „ Ay Ua�!11!W i y i Ay UaneH , Ay UaneH 1 � t 1 ny esowJaH i Ay esowJaH Ay pleq!uoJd o Ay pleq!uoJd 1 i Ay Uew11aH i cu c Ay UewllaH � v 1 Ay pJeA@ U!n IS Ue1.18we0 �41_idgs1- 1 ••�..� Fsos.y"$mss,. ••�. _ Ad aAOJ� �._. •� U C m to S �o�_E$E Esc ••� -C O 0"J0 U) �y� Q vE wya C W LL €�c°q?�Y�y_ C SS��Fx€=x�=A < U) cu ffiIgy g`3; gqy _ O guu�i^ggg4oa S z = A55E,�a "gtl"= Q< j BEo_n' Eo f]'� �`s5 s o- - U = P157 STAFF REPORT PUNCHO CUCAMONG.-1 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Board President L. Dennis Michael and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, District CEO From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Subject: Proposed Fee Amendments for the Fire District RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve Resolution No. FD 12-057. This resolution consolidates mulitple existing fee resolutions, revises existing fees, establishes needed fees, and includes fees associated with other legislative actions. This proposed resolution will revise Resolution No. FD 06-015, Resolution No. FD 09-026, and Resolution No. FD 10-040. BACKGROUND In April 2006, the Board adopted Resolution No. FD 06-015. This resolution contained the cost recovery fees that staff could assess for the various emergency and non-emergency services provided-by District personnel. The resolution contained fees related to development services such as plan reviews and construction inspections, annual inspection services including permit fees, investigation and canine services, hazardous materials mitigation services including cost recovery for time and materials used in securing hazardous materials spills, cost recovery for juvenile fire setter intervention services, and other various products and services provided by District personnel which the Board approved for cost recovery. Because the fees established by the 2006 resolution were largely based on estimates derived from a time and motion study completed by Maximus, staff committed to the Board to monitor actual experience with providing the services and, where applicable, recommend adjustments to the approved fees. In 2009, the sections of Resolution No. FD 06-015 that contained the permit and inspection fees were rescinded and replaced by a stand alone resolution that contained all of the fees associated with the inspection, prevention, and risk reduction services provided by the Prevention Bureau. That resolution is Resolution No. FD 09-026. The primary reason for taking this course of action was that staff was requesting reductions to many of the previously approved inspection and permit fees based on actual experience with assessing the fee for cost recovery. The large number of requested fee reductions was facilitated by approving a separate resolution. In 2010, the Board, at the request of staff, approved several new sub-categories to the standard permits required by the California Fire Code. These new sub-categories allowed staff to better align permit fees with the actual cost of providing the required inspection services. The inspection and permit fees associated with the sub-categories were less than the fees for the main category, which provided a more accurate cost recovery mechanism. That resolution is Resolution No. FD 10-040. P158 PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR THE FIRE DISTRICT PAGE 2 DECEMBER 19,2012 With the impending transition to Accela Automation to replace Tidemark and the associated cost recovery for the enhanced service made possible by the Automation program, staff is using this opportunity to review the Fire District's fees and fee resolutions. ANALYSIS In reviewing the remaining approved sections of Resolution No. FD 06-15, it was determined that the development services fees are outdated. They were originally established in 2006 and based on the compensation schedule of the District's Support Services employee group. Because Fire Construction Services, on behalf of the District, provides the plan check, inspection, and related services for new construction, the development fees associated with Fire District work have been set by the City's Building & Safety Department based on the fully burdened cost of the personnel assigned to the Fire Construction Services division. Because of this inconsistency counsel has advised eliminating the development services fees that are contained in the District resolution. Resolution No. FD 06-015 also contains a fixed mileage reimbursement rate that is now outdated due to changes in rates and.costs since the resolution was approved by the Board. Instead of using a fixed rate, which will necessitate Board approval.for revisions from time to time, the proposed revision simply uses whatever the current IRS mileage rate is at the time that servicesk are provided. Similar to the problem with a fixed rate for mileage, Resolution No. FD 06-015 set an actual cost for locks supplied by the Fire District. As the cost of the locks has increased over the years, staff has been limited to charging only the approved dollar amount for the locks. To remedy this, the proposed resolution sets the cost of the locks at the current cost. This provides for continuous cost recovery capability. Similarly, the Fire District now provides the ladder point and photovoltaic identification placards. The decision to provide these placards rather than continue to have them purchased by contractors through third party providers came from a recommendation of the working group that analyzed the development review process and also by way of recommendation from general contractors. There was a desire to have placards that are standardized with regard to materials and have the placards be readily available when needed. To allow for increases in the cost of the signs in ensuing.years, the approved cost was simply set at the actual cost of the sign. The fees in Resolution No. FD 06-015 associated with the illegal possession and use of fireworks are no longer needed since the Administrative Citation process is now used to enforce fireworks laws. At the time the resolution was approved the Fire District did not have an Administrative Citation ordinance and an approved fee was the best way to enforce fireworks laws. The fees for the Special Permit for fire alarm services and the re-inspection fee are now part of Resolution No. FD 09-026 and need to be repealed from Resolution No. FD 06-015. The review of Resolution No. FD 06-015 also found that the administrative fees approved with Community Facilities Districts 85-1 and 88-1 could be consolidated in the proposed new resolution. Through the proposed resolution, staff is recommending additional fee reductions to some of the inspection and permit fees. Based on tracking actual field experience with average amounts of time spent on the total inspection and compliance process for businesses and facilities subject to the annual inspection program, staff is recommending the reduction of 68 of the 180 permit and inspection fees. Examples of fees that are proposed to be reduced are the inspection or permit fees for restaurants, churches, apartment buildings, roofing work, small dry cleaning businesses, and P159 PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR THE FIRE DIS'I'Rlc,r PAGE 3 DECEMBER 19,2012 warehouses with high piled storage. The reductions range from $20 to $110 per annual permit. The dollar amounts represent reductions of 8% to 25%. Through this proposed resolution, staff is asking the Board to approve a new inspection fee. The Board previously approved a Requested Inspection fee that is assessed when inspection services are not required by codes or policies but are desired by a business owner for various reasons such as verification by an insurance provider that a business is in compliance with applicable fire safety standards. This fee has also been used to recover the cost of standby time when Bureau personnel are needed or requested at large gathering special events that do not otherwise require a permit. The new fee that is needed is the after hours version of the Requested Inspection fee. There have been a few times in the recent past when Bureau personnel where on standby assignments after regular work hours and weekend days. These hours incur overtime expenses. The overtime expense could not be fully recovered since the approved Requested Inspection fee is based on the fully burdened compensation rate of regular time pay. To correct this, the proposed fee schedule now includes a fee for Requested Inspection or Standby During Regular Work Hours and a fee for Requested Inspection or Standby After Regular Work Hours. Also in the proposed resolution is a 4.5% technology fee that is proposed to be assessed on approved inspection and permit fees as part of the Accela Automation project. The revised fees become effective 60 days from the date of the approval of the resolution. Respectfully-submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief P160 RESOLUTION NO. FD 12-057 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING, REVISING, AND UPDATING VARIOUS FEES AND REVISING RESOLUTION NO. FD 06-015, RESOLUTION NO. FD 09-026, AND RESOLUTION NO. FD 10-040. A. RECITALS (i) The Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge as hereinafter set forth, the local agency shall hold a noticed public hearing to consider the matter. (ii) On December 19, 2012, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed fees and service charges, as required by law. (iii) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. The Board of Directors has determined that none of the fees established herein exceeds the reasonable estimated cost of providing the service to which each such fee applies or the actual cost recovery of the materials, products, and/or use of facilities. 3. The following fee schedule is hereby approved and adopted: SECTION 1: Resolution No. FD 06-015 is hereby revised as follows: A. Development Review Fees are repealed. B. Special Services Fees are revised as follows: 1. Per mile mileage charges for use of the K-9 Team by other agencies is revised to be the current IRS Rate. P161 2. The fee for Fire District issued access padlocks is revised to be the actual cost of materials plus the fully burdened hourly rate. 3. The fee for possession or use of dangerous fireworks is repealed. 4. The fee for unlawful use of safe and sane fireworks is repealed. 5. The fees for Special Permit and Inspections are repealed. C. All Other Fees. All other fees in Resolution No. FD 06-015 remain unchanged and are incorporated by reference. SECTION 2: Resolution No. FD 09-026 and Resolution No. FD 10-040 are revised as follows: A. Inspection Fees Additional Re-Inspections after Initial Re-inspection $110 Requested Inspection or Standby During Regular Work Hours (per hour- one hour min.) $110 Unscheduled Field Inspection or Investigation $550 Apartment Building/Complex Annual Inspection Buildings with 3 or 4 units $165 Buildings with 5 to 7 units $220 Buildings with 8 units $330 Each additional dwelling unit beginning with the ninth unit(per unit) $11 Condominium Complex Annual Inspection $330 Hotel/Motel Annual Inspection First 10 rooms $330 Each additional room (per room) $11 Licensed Care Facility Pre-inspection -25 or fewer residents $50 Pre-inspection - more than 25 residents $100 Annual Inspection Home Care Facility (More than six clients) $220 Commercial facility- First 10 rooms $330 Commercial facility - Each additional room (per room) $11 High Rise Building (per hour) $110 Large Family Daycare Annual Inspection $110 Adult/ Child Care Facility (Group 1-4 Occupancies)Annual Inspection $330 Private School/ Large Child Care Facility (Group E Occupancies) Annual Inspection Small School $220 Large School $330 Medical Facility Annual Inspection Hospital/ Nursing Home (Group 1-2 Occupancies) $660 Clinic $220 Ambulatory Care Facility (Group 1-2.1 Occupancy) $330 Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour-one hour minimum) $110 Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 2 of 8 P162 B. Fire Code Activity Permits (Single Event—One Time) Amusement Buildings $275 Asphalt Kettle Hot Work _Non-Pumping and less than 150 gallons $110 Pumping or more than 150 gallons $220 Carnivals Fairs, and Outdoor Public Assemblages $220 Commercial Cooking Operation at Carnival, Fair, Outdoor Event $136 Exhibits and Tradeshows $220 Explosives/ blasting agents single day use $220 Fireworks; public display or special effects Small Display/ Limited effects 1-4 minutes $220 Medium Display/Moderate effects 5-8 minutes $550 Large Display/ Extensive effects 9 or more minutes $743 Hazardous Materials Tank- Remove or Abandon in Place $1,128 Hot work single day operation $110 LP-gas install stationary container $165 Liquid or gas fueled vehicles in assembly area single event $165 Live Audience $220 Open burning single day use $110 Open Flames and Torches for paint removal $110 Open Flames and Torches in a hazardous fire area $110 Open Flames and Candles in assembly area -single day permit $110 Parade - inspection of floats $110 Place of Assembly $220 Pyrotechnical special effects -See Fireworks Recreational Fire $110 Seasonal Sales Lot $136 Tent or Temporary Membrane Structure $220 Torch Applied Roof Hot Work Patch/Repair(500 sq ft or less) $110 Roof Replacement (more than 500 sq ft) $165 C. Annually Renewable Permits Access Control Commercial $165 Residential (Requires monthly testing) $550 Aerosol Products $550 Ambulatory Health Care Facility $220 Amusement Buildings $275 Aviation Facility Servicing or Repair $550 Fuel Servicing Vehicles $220 Battery Charging Operation $220 Cellulose Nitrate Film $330 Combustible Dust Producing Operations 5,000 square feet or less $275 Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 3 of 8 P163 5,001 to 15,000 square feet $550 More than 15,000 square feet $715 Combustible Fibers $275 Commercial Cooking Operation $220 Compressed Gases Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Highly Toxic-any amount $330 Inert and Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cubic feet $330 Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Medical Use Gas - Less than Table 105.6.8 Amounts Portable Cylinders $165 Piped System $220 Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet $330 Oxidizing including oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet $330 Pyrophoric- any amount $330 Radioactive -any amount $330 Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet $330 Toxic-any amount $330 Unstable Reactive- any amount $330 Covered Mall Building $658 Cryogenic Fluids $330 Cutting and Welding $275 Delayed and Access-Controlled Egress $165 Dipping Operations $330 Dry Cleaning Plant Small - 1 or 2 machines $220 Medium - 3 or 4 machines $330 Large - 5 or more machines $715 Explosives Process, manufacture, store, or sell $345 Use $240 Fire Alarm Central/Remote Station $10/acct Fire Hydrants and Valves $165 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Class I Liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. outside of a building $165 Class II or Class IIIA 25 gal. in a building; 60 gal. outside of a building . $165 i I 250 gallons or less over maximum allowable quantity $550 ' r 251-500 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $578 i 501-1,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $605 1,001-5,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $633 5,001-10,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $660 R More than 10,000 gallons over maximum allowable quantity $688 Remove Class I or Class II from a UST $936 Operate Tank Vehicles, etc $330 Place a tank out of service $936 Change Contents $550 Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine Flammable/Combustible.Liquids $1,128 I j Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 4 of 8 P164 Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't, Manufacturing.Establishments $330 Dispense -Tank Vehicle to Fuel Tank $330 Use or Operate a Pipeline within a Facility $743 Floor Finishing in excess of 350 square feet using Class I or Class II liquids Commercial/ Industrial $240 Residential $136 Fruit and Crop Ripening $550 Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in Table 105.6.20 Gallons -250 or fewer $550 Gallons -251-500 $578 Gallons -501-1,000 $605 Gallons - 1,001-5,000 $633 Gallons - 5,001-10,000 $660 Gallons -More than 10,000 $688 Pounds - 1,000 or fewer $550 Pounds - 1,001-5,000 $578 Pounds - 5,001-10,000 $605 Pounds - 10,001-25,000 $633 Pounds -25,001-50,000 $660 Pounds More than 50,000 $688 Cubic feet- 500 or fewer $550 Cubic feet- 501-2,000 $578 Cubic feet-2,001-5,000 $605 Cubic feet- 5,001-10,000 $633 Cubic feet- 10,001-25,000 $660 Cubic feet- More than 25,000 $688 HPM Facilities $440 High Piled Storage in excess of 500 square feet 500-75,000 square feet $550 75,001-500,000 square feet $605 More than 500,000 square feet $660 Hot Work Hot Work Fixed Site $275 Hot Work Operations $220 Hot Work Program $165 Industrial Facility/ Shop (Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply) i 2,500 square feet or less $240 2,501 — 5,000 square feet $330 5,001 — 15,000 square feet $550 15,001 —50,000 square feet $743 More than 50,000 square feet—Actual permit fees P Industrial Ovens $330 Large Family Daycare $110 Liquid-or Gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in assembly buildings $165 LP-Gas Store, use, handle, dispense, sell $220 Industrial Trucks and Equipment Only (4 cylinders max.) $165 Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 5 of 8 P165 Cylinder Exchange only $110 Live Audience $240 Lumber Yard and Woodworking Plant $440 Magnesium $330 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage $220 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility—Commercial $330 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility— Residential $110 Open Flames Open Flames and Torches for paint removal and industrial work $110 Open Flames and Torches in a hazardous fire area $110 Open Flames and Candles in Assembly Area/Restaurant $110 Organic Coatings $330 Pallet Storage $275 Place of Assembly A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums, and similar $440 A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns, Bars $330 A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement $330 A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar with fixed seats $440 A-5 Outdoor assembly areas and uses $660 Powder Coating $330 Private Fire Hydrant $165 Production Facility $385 Pyrotechnic Special Effects Material (See Fireworks Single) Pyroxylin Plastics $440 Recycling and Scrap Metal Facilities $550 Refrigeration Equipment $275 Reinforced Plastics/Resin Application $330 Repair Garage/ Industrial Facility (Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply) 2,500 square feet or less $240 2,501 -5,000 square feet $330 5,001 - 15,000 square feet $550 15,001 to 50,000 square feet $743 More than 50,000 square feet-Actual permit fees Rooftop Heliport $220 Spraying Operations $330 Stationary Storage Battery System $330 Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts $220 Tire Rebuilding Plants $1,128 Waste Handling Facility $550 Wood Products $440 Wrecking Yard $550 Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 6 of 8 P166 SECTION 3: The following fees are established or updated: A. Signs and Placards. Fees charged for Fire District supplied signs and placards are established.to be the actual materials cost plus fully burdened hourly rate. B. After Hours Requested Inspection. The fee for a Requested inspection or Standby after regular work hours is established to be $165.00 per hour with a one hour minimum charge. C. Technology Fee. A Technology Fee is established in the amount of four and one half percent (4.5%) of inspection and permit fees. D. Community Facilities District. The application fee for annexation into a community facilities district is updated as follows: 1. One (1) to four (4) single family residential parcels ......................:..$ 560.00 2. More than four (4) single family residential parcels, commercial parcels/projects, and industrial parcels/projects ...............................$700.00 SECTION 4: Date of Effect This Resolution shall take effect 60 days from the date of approval. 4. The Secretary to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures. Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 7 of 8 P167 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2012. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary 1, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District', at a Regular Meeting of said Board held on the day of 2012. Executed this day of 2012 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary Resolution No. FD 12-057 - Page 8 of 8 P168 d d U- '0 O O O In O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O) Ln to N M M M O 1101 IN ICO . ICO IN ico CD N CO 0 � � cn N CO `— co co N M CO N co Co " CO 0 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 69 � X 69 EfA 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 O a` m m r o00 00 00 � o o , o0 oo � OCD0 o0 0000 C � � In 00 'ZT M M M , o I't M � Cl) C) 't cM co 'l- cM d � � LO � N CO M M � N M ` � (M N M CD N M I 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N 3 4 U LL N .� G1 E U. L � G1 N a 0 L- a ca N = L o g O O U N O ■� � Q n V n c c m 4 E �o a cL LL o U) C o c Q X- o E o cn w CD O (D c o CL E cu CO O N O C) cu O ■ � ` U L -p fA r- n - O L cu O c o( O ° a CL LL ui o y m U a) — CD CD o a o 0 cn co c j � � rn W a -C a Li m O m . . O, o LL c s o x o E i i n 0)5 LO cn a) o o a co LO co 0 0 0 o c c U N � c c � I I ca E �- Q- _ c x n E c o o a� L Q o o Q- ` c cn o 0 0 o o n a� E E o o 0 a) 0 0 � Z U c N1 o c U 3 3 3 n — o - U U w E E E c- Co s — cn v =v - a) a) c o o o o LL rn U U c 0 � '� U -0 o o rn ov E -v n (n o 0 o c cu c o cu W 2UU >, 2 (nom LL a) O C c c cu 0 0 N c L J Q �_• O c nu � � v � sU c � c � •� •� M 0 cum cu cy) c C o cn U c cn U o o c U o ._ N c :_ c -p 5 5 5 o E Q cu c > >, o E o — o E Q aa) v 5 m M 00 0O W .2 L.L W U d a Q m U (n _I cu 2 U Q V a? -v O -a N Co t U) -C _ U — cn E � G1 c m o ca — a� E o cn � a� a) �. O- � � U -� -o � c r � ±- o � 2 N — Q co o c o ` M > C .T Q c n O o U rn o -a 'c o _ � IZ) Q U 2 J 2 J Q Q P169 d U- 00 LC) O O O c0 O O O O M N LO V) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (D O O (n d ti � (V N M N N N In 't CD t0 N N tM N O N GN � N N — N N V LO I- N N N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 UY 69 6S 69 6S 69 (f3 6fl 69 69 bs 69 O L- 0. LL d a) r LO (D O O (D O O O O M N 00 00 O (D (D (D (D (D O (D (D O (D O C 00 M It It M It It 't Lr) IT 0p a0 M M M M M M M It M a1 M N N � N N N LO r- - N N N N N 69 69 69 69 6c3 69 69 V.3 EA U9, 69 69 69 (f? EA 603 U93 U93 69 69 64 69 69 69 3 4 U 4) N d ELL L M 4) N aCL � ° = a U) L 0 Q> o ■� > (V 40 y (1) 0 m c°o d LL ,wr�/� -W A V/ O _ — fn c LO (n cn E c N E 0_ 0 co E c a) L C U fa O c }++r V m -0 a) E N 0) N a) Q N V c > � + L � •L 0 = c LO a) tOn `- O U L O > Y U O co O + N Q >' > y �, cq °o ai a) L Z o 0 3 o co cu Q a) ° E E a) w LO ' ++ L U 7 v a) C N a) a) a) LL U C a) - N m N .> O On C -0 Q N co a > Co o d ca �' a) a) o c aa) c Q ca 3 a c/) cn •� W o f c N Q ' a) ca ,c o ca o Y ° a� LL E o) N c O c v ° ° c 0) c �c � c � a) O cu >, >, Co -C N a) a) E �. O �- N o d a 0 o o ca T n ca a) :� L ° N � ° a) ° °o m tq rn E -a rn rn °i D: p v°, n c > c E aa) ° = cn E c o ° c o c •� o 0 0 ° -v :� o >, o Z, o a) -v Z a -2 o E L — a) - U cc N 7 = uj O c`0 cc V — a) a) % 7 O C C U L C L- cn Q N Co a) L o � � �o a 0) ca — a) c� m m a) (D LL a) 0 o a) a G> D E N " v) U °) cn cn CL m N LL c U- F ° U) -j U) N ca c .E a) a) a) c c c E _ o a) I E E E Q c m a O U co a) cn 0 L ° ca H Q E Y L �° ° °n .:°_ m o U c Q cu °o i cn s E _0 3 M � Q c c c c m m N o l a Q L E L C2 a) N 0) 5 a) a) a) a) O CU U O U ca c L- E cn co O X X ." ca •� > O Q d O c0 >, a) a) a) O IL QQ C) 0wwLL = JJJ0000 F, a � U) P170 d U- Lo O O O Ln O O O Ln LO O u) to 0 O O Cl O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cfl Ln Ln N I- Ln N N 00 fl- LO � f— N co co co co M (0 N M M M M M M M N LO M N N 0 N N CO N U) c- N 04 M M M co co c N M M M M M M M c bs 69 69 69 (Al 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 H3 64 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Q O CL d m um �+ co O O O LO 0 0 0 O O co O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 00 Lo LO It 00 Ln tt It LO CO LO 'cr co It co co co M CY) wlqll M M M M M M M d r LLB LO N CO LP) N 04 't CO LP) fl_ M N M co co co co N CO M CO CO CO CO CO ,,AA E!? 69 E9 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 K-? 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 V/ U LL N E LL L 13 G1 N 0 0. 0 N 7 r i O o M� > M V d Q1 ca 4 O d Q LL_ v Q 4? .. L i E O U U_ U � L L .••. +• (p O 0 .fl 0) 0,+ V a U L — O v C O ■L O U N ca a3 U) c cn �// L C O U O a) -0 ca a) � U O ■T 3 C a) O O � :3 -C «. O E Q (Q O N cn a) O N C U �. ca N �- c O ca U N c c 0 cn CO a) �.-. c O N >, F C E cn N N ca C ca O H O cn N p) a) O c c Q� U _ ca E N —1 a O ca ca o cn o L ca _ rn E ca .. ■L U Co a) D) "' (� O L"-a L D �, L ca >' N C fa �, L j a) LL a) ci aa) o a�oi o °O m af°i ca N U >, ca m e o rn = O a Q (' a) = ca ca E ca a) a a) O LO O rn U a) a) a) s ca ate) T ca (n o m o Ln a) ca 'n ca -0 o a) 0) >, Q N C C C a) O IL a' O i a) > co O O U N E V O .7 U (n C , = O O Co o f >+ C U L N Q o N U Co O E cn = N m ' .� a) p) ca D O O m LL 00 (� t E � :E � 0 s -0 o � � X CD Q� .`� O a) p = a) D w O O O ca a) •L a) �. X >, ca a) o O ♦+ U U w a o c 0 (n LL L Z Lri Lri � U aN co) LL 2 L 2 O O a W cn � Z) _ U) .E vi (A Co cn � -0 -0 E n L o -0 = cu — E E E E IL Q QQQQ mUU UUU P171 d d U- U 00 O O O O O O LO 00 U LO LLB 0 O 00 LO M O 00 co O O O N Ln LO LO W Lf) co co co co N M I H M O co O L1) Il- O M O 00 M M M LO I— Il- � O O M M � CO N co I— M N O LO LLB CO O co O O M O) L() - N N I� Q 69 613 69 69 69 69 69 Ef> 69 69 6s 69 69 69 69 69 69 Ef> 63 Ef> 69 69 t% -- 6q 01) H3 O a` - U a+ CO O Co 00 O O O M Ln O U 00 00 00 O 00 O M O 00 O O O O N O O M C LO CO CO 00 co � 19T 't "t N 00 00 00 LLB Il- O M O 00 M M M U') M M 't a> co Cf) CO CO N It I— CO N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 LL- - co co fl- 69). 9 EA K-J Ef3 H3 69 K3 K3 6c> Y." FT 69 69 K3 K3, 691 t4 6q V9E 6% Qtj 9 En3 V/ 7 d4 U L V rn co o a) CL 0 O L ,f° � a = a ° o cu cu f W i Mo � .c w C ° c0 .� > -0 =3 O E *+ N 0) c o m C) >' U � ca i ca a cL LL C c ca >, c m U cu — — L ca � o � U 3 m -0 ca 3:W V V a N CN 3 -a ca o ° � L� ca ca 3 — a) L O L- ca 0 3 0 � 0 x E c rn x �+ O X _o m cxa m E o LL Qa`)) u°i ax) L cxa E cu E L-a) > cn m U m .o ~ = a r 0 aS a .c a) E a) > o ° cn C vi .0 a) — > L o — — o a) — d c ca — U > cn — v, s a — 0 x Q o a) N c 0 U U E — ca E .� O rn - .� a) m a > L U U a) O = U c 0 L U E > ca E u O .� co a) U C CO O O a) � � O O Y ca LL E ' O O U N to C O co 0) O U 7 C a U C a) N o E c a� � a 0 0 °' o o cn c ca 3 � ca > -0 5U N — rnoo .— m c U rn a O M LO v7 cn co O J o 0 0 0 0 C N O 0 U N 0 cn � O ca E ' co U_ U — — ca O O LI> > ca 0) C c L C O a) rn a) 0 c w w O 0 � � r O ca m O > to ca a- (a O m U ca cn cn ' ' O O a) E a) U c a a 0 —ca LL > a) N O) E N LO cn 10 ca O O Lo O O O O O a) Q N -c ca U_ Mn cn U. U 'C W C 0 c:C: U) � J N a- c O D U N N LO LO O U a) E TO O >+ co N N N O . ca OC) > U Q E a) O E ca 6-1 U U i iI a U0 � O w ii P172 d U. 'C O (D O O a0 In M O 00 O a0 In M O 00 O a0 lC) M O 00 O O Lo O d It co (n (n I- O M (0 M Lt) I- O M CD 00 0 I- O M (0 00 'cl, LCD O 0 N N � LO LO 0 (D (D (D (D U') 0 co (0 (D co m 0 (D 0 (D (D 'T � (D (fl O (f) Efl 69 V) H? 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 C2 O a` m m LL .+ O (0 O O aO Ln CO CD 00 O 00 LOCO 0 OO O CO M CM O (GO O O LC) O C NT co LC) LO fl- O co (0 00 V) Il- O co (D 00 LC) Il- O M (D 0 � LO O (�D CO d N � Lt) LC) Ll) (D (D CD (D LC) LC) (D CD CD (D LC) LO Co (D (D (D NT In (D (d�$ (D ,w rte. 69 69 Eft Eft 69 d4 Ef3 (A 6G. 613 Ef3 (f3 V9, 69 Ef3 Ef, 69 K3 69 69 d4 69 69 6R (f3 V, 7 U LL N CD ELL. L � N aCL 0 N 7 — r L CU O 0 N o ■� > LO (0 wV 4) o C)7 N W 4) N U d LL U N O + + M D p L C L L — 70 r-•. O c }+ V a. 0 N O O O ■ U — O LC) Ln L 0 U '= 3 E CD O ` O O LO O O ,� (U O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 N CD m C U � O O O O O O O O CD Ln O D p •C O a) 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Lo N 00 O C5 N (C6 '� a) N (S LO 3 o c .� Lo- o c C) Lo - ■L M D 0 0) 0 0 0 0 ( 0 O N Lf) co �O C O , U � N O CD '� -0 U O LCD t O L? L , O U (0 O C X " O , , «. , , ., 0 0 0 0 O O O Lo � O 0 0 O O O U D O m Cl) 0 0 0 0 L- 0 0 0 0 0 � llO ll� CV LO X O O m a) C .0 LC) LA O O O O O O O d L 0 , , , , O U O LO C c) .0 'C U N N In Ln 2 7 7 L1� r N 2 +, ,J .� +. .. . C 0 - o O O C Q ` (U , , , , , , , , , , , , N CU O N N N O e O O O C O U U U U U U U U U U U U .� .� O L ■ C E O E O C C c c c C -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 m N r r d +' O O O O O O C C C C C C U_ U_ U_ _U U_ _U (a p _ N (7) E U C1 N = = = = = = D D D D D D -0 -0 X) M U O p O L LL N U �' U U U U U U U d d d d U U U U U U LO ' N Via.+ C -0 O (Q D LL E CU LL a � _ co d O D N C� aU- L _ _ _ P173 CD CD U- LO O LO O O O M O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- N (O V- CO LO ICT CO � (O N (O � IZT M N f— r- — � � CO CO 0 N N N M 0 ti CO � � N � � N It M N N � � � � CO CO O 69 69 69 Efl 6), 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 E9 Ef), Ef3 6> 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 Q O a CD d U. a+ O O co O O O co O (O co O m (O O O O O O (O (O co O O O C co It 00 NT M LO It co M 00 't 00 m It It co d' co co co m m co co d CO N N M LO I- CO N N t CO N CO CO CO N 69 6+> 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 603 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 (f3 (A (f3 w+ 3 W U LL }� d ■ CL 1 W U) C. a p co p3 C a N � 0) LLB. O . �O C ■� > L-7 p (0 (0 3 to m (o °' —° c cu CU m U a LL N cu a) ca (6 Q N U a +O- Q C> + C co .i C (a c6 a 0 U � Q s N .�_ a) Q C. O O .� E a) O C C cn co ■� 3 �) 4 O C E C E U N U N Q L +� a) r Q _d ca a) a) a) a> N 'O : a) : o W O O O O O ca L a) CO 0 O " 7 a U cn O C �+ O a) Y — — �� A N a) 6 O O U -0 C C' O N LL L- f� O 00 O C V (a 3 -0 (0 c0 m N cu X a O O- O O O O a) s � :_ LL LL cn cn cn Lf O — O 0 0 Lo > t U O � m m N O N i L O a s o LO In c o ai ~ w o � .c c E E E Q L N Lri � ° m 0 aD - E N 'in m m (0 0 0 0 m L >, o c a) o c c LL lL U- O o a) ) d � c c U a a c c c 0) �. .� �. •� 0 0 0 0 o o _ o w .N v7 cn a) a) a> m CD 0 0 0 C Lo Lo O O >, cu 0 � >, V D O — — C_ C_ C. 222 � `. NC-4L[i � � 0 U cn cU c E o � � ° 000 o r (o (� O } C C � 7 CU C0 U O ` LL , C C cn c6 LL LL 0 cq o v CT CL > j c� N o o a a 2 C J J J J J 2 O O a P174 U. V 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo LO o O LO 0 0 0 0 co o C) o O N 0 0 0 (D �t M M 't 0 M M (O IT LO f- co 't CO LO It LO CO CO N r- 0 't LC) N It M M It (O M G M 't LP) N M N CO LO fl- LP) M co N - LO ICT LO a 69 (fl (A 6R 69 64 (fl 64 69 64 bs 69 64 6R 603 6031 60), 69 69 64 64 to 64 0 U.a m m .. O V) V) O O O M LO O O O O 0 0 0 co O O O O N O 0 C) C It w w 't (O M O w q1t LO CO CO qt M LO It LO CO M I LO 't U.) d1 qt CO M �t (O CO � CO qt LO CO M N M U) I-_ L(') M M N - LO Nt LO 613 69 69 69 64 Ef3 6q 6R 69 (f3 tf3 6q 6R? Ef3 6ck 69 69 d3 69 69 69 69 69 7 4 U 4) LL N .W 0 ■� d LL 4) a N a a p ca CL a cn m L m a U O Q> c0 O ■� > y > a) V d > N a) p N .� +u cL LL d F- C f� O a) a) a) U U N co O (D (n (D `N L E cu O 5 .. — L O L� Y a) i o f (n O E CD 2 C " Q a•+ U a O aa)) c Co cn aa) a ■� 4 -0 E -0 ii c9 m Qi cu Zn m 0 - cl '� U) C Q .yam 3 Cm o .: = s co ca o (D cn m '� a) aa)) E o 2) aC >, a) - CL 4) o cam a) L U Z Q (6 m a 0 oO N (`� Q 0 >, CL .i o vi oo (n (D Q � CY o p m U O > Cl) j M C Q O Q Cl) O p "�cn_ 0 nc a) c aa) a) opOOO = co } - o _ ` O O to O W a) O O- LO Ln (� cn — C O N 00 0 a E O Co O LO 0 C (n m _� co O- U O _0 C (B ca _a (n O O- Ln (6 C H c0 (B O H CO a C 0 o) - — a) U fn Q (n 0 C) 0 M o a O LL E C >, U a = W m a) O O O O O L L 0) C -0 a) .- N M d LO -- 2 LOL W � C C O C LO lL) O O a a) O U C U L- U Q Q Q Q Q p a) C .(? a (B O N N Lo 0 T � r.r Q U O C 0) a) c6 2 + O ca 0 0) .� LL c C " U U -0 = a) "' O a) U 0) O O O 0) a) -0 U 3 > D O O U : .0 fl O � y=' O to O a) G� D o .L o >`, >, a) (D a� (D o a m 0 •� m 0 CL aaa- aaof WW- w Wcncncnf= � � � C MINN Cl)Ila = O = o G Rv l<.,�. :":4:„,,,.., .1.i ,- le �e w 0 L O 4 di a/ O0 a. Z Cif c MI wC) L. a� OM 13 O C 4' C) .:.-1 a di V C RI C V O p Q V O 0 o a. 0 O Z u. > 0 Ugt _ IS >, 4UJ 0 tet < 0 U0 1P' . it 10 cn id 0 p 0 4 O 0 CD a) Cfl a) O n O _co L O O O .- a) v/ N _I Q. -# 4-• 016 o D) s. N p C N cn > T2 0 C. a) = v V E o C� a) t ° 0 o _c a) co , - '� t C a) = o V -0 4- as co +r Q �--+ Cu OOo w •c Qaa) Qv � U0 D o Ce i� o U >N Eelratt • • • • U a To n CL U . ID C P. �O 0 - -D- i "`a '" , C U o U v L. -o N = E-0 :E °' a CD U En - 0 � - a LL v 0 L. �CD -- N •00- U) ( p O >> CZ."r 1 Y 2 Q Q) C Oda L co O Q. Q N co LL Uu _ >% O 0 = r c\! N ZUc OWN To or Ovn o� c cr vP4 U . U OV ec w 1 I a) �' • • • .f/� 0) a c X O v N 4- 0 a) >% r CI3 0 L. a) = O C Q v (N1 >, (� aD ca >% _W -0 o , , t C o L. W -' Q .— C I a) c t N _o " o a) O ' O C = L co a) a • O.ZU -I E o >' E ' a) O 0 p4 UU O cv L.L Z D I 1 lot • • • c O •> _ ce co , 1 O. +-+ as g CD in co c > 41- a) •- cp 2 L >% U = a 4- O •c c cn 12g :14 4-1 0 Q) li- O Ti ,� 0 N p .-Lr ,e. O ca. f� Ee »;; w Vi.µ 0 _a) U UQ' - e0 a O O 0 CD CD a)° < LLB I I I eb:1144 0143 1_4 1 • 0 o 5 -a co 'o (o v L � a rr^^ 2 Q Ii L ^,r.4- U a) Q) C 2 0 (0 a) CD C a D c • C C t, U C 2 . — C CO 0 CD Mm > -0 0 W N E CD 4-•O m C (IT, I CO U 0 c i M it =r A Co 0) 3 0 .! 2" 02 co ci) `' V 2 V E O N >+ co -S ;0 E a " c +.+ U � 6CU � c.i3ON (a +L.. U '� - , _ OQ N NNOt 0 ZV - ++ o +� c w > a)act k cxU0 av) � � •w4Z I ttli#1 LL A oill m c E o E a° aap A 0 a as O. I a) to 0 0 L 22 Cl) 0 O V 3 — a) c 1- CO •i L.L. M - N E 1 -'I- . . a) S I U3 • `) 'a d Z c co � � 03 W Q. • E O k o m a .,----- 1 -1 c ...g.. te r+ 7 U A c v o � = m /� $ E o p _ Ule.m - °' E c Z U ui , 1 \1 \l O O i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O to O In N N r r d4 fR EI-? Eft E!} ' ;unowv as j a) C • c o C �' . CO o a c 0 I o o a co 0 C// }� V o L ---+ co — ca 0 _ CO •— -D c = >1 CO a Q 0 `~ N O ,, 0 _ o as a) r w L— x es- r a ^'x ZU -1 _ E 0 W > � p4 UO I Cl) 1 I z 1 i vbro 1 c F ; w C rp i 0 itsEwcijiEw..06:15:erEtneo t .4= a V 1 U) ''„- .` 4- Q) a.Q C a)L a) LL Z t RS � m _ 0 0 0 Q '”VS c C CI ® mU1 C u_.i .0 Q C �. , . . G� V�_ m 0 4 z U �0O 0 0 11111111\ II:l \u- o� < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:'' ,:_,` 0 I. 0 0 0 0 0 bt). 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 �9 �—J r---- co- u i NI cti 0.1- r- lunowy aa: •� co �--+ a) a) •., IL c) •— O •� a CTS 0 i d) , U LL , c. c c• _ te •c cm -5 >, a) p E a) Q W >7, n CO U N co a) 0 +r Q U co �' a) , a) 0_ N C O I Y� •0- r p c t O N a) 0 0 c = c„, CO „ 4,,...„ 4,ZU J LL as OQ a) co co ck c,€, � 4 2 > O N � UV Q j EL A 0 LL N s4 • • . . ing 0 = 0 N C -0 (f) N o = � 1 d sa ,; p co CO u) a co U0 co CU 0 a c(1) 'V 0 CO o Ill a_ O cn U N N O W N Q as > 0 Ce �4 u_) 0 o .- � ° 0 4. a > N � C co C - .— 0 c.O o. ° y r 0 .w C.) a U , — U. N E O > a� 6 CO ZU -, •- •- o < < CO v N N p a i cxU0 S W 0_ CL N LL o tea* • J —+ co E o Q so cn N a)ea c � > as O > a> U p 2 N V a) a L Q CD a co a LL O O aI w •—L. 1 co V O O Q c O CO C cm a) co O N r 0 CO U O N co 4 ® ° •` N O C .- .� N u) 0 +r N O > t� U �-�— 0 •a a) N c6 = O a oit< a CDC ze (s! U � i CO c6 Q -- �� • Co a, r I r Na In C p C .0 N ■ r • V CD C -1-0 C O 0) - IN■M .v '- c — C I E U D•_ U 0 . _ o 0 O ;, v >, O ._ a.nom, '� ■_ '_ . ® �, \ • 0 a LL f; Z U Voo a � o -Q P4 UC) >i Q W Q , :•is V IL P175 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Tiffany'Cooper, Management Analyst II Subject: PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR CITY CLERK AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution Number 12-196 to revise user fees for copy services and development related services, including a new fee to assist in funding the cost of technology upgrades for development services. BACKGROUND The City can impose fees under the authority granted by California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq, including the requirement to hold at least one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled City Council meeting to allow for public comment on its proposed fees. Fees are allowed to be imposed in order to recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. This report covers requests for revisions to fees for the following work groups: City Clerk and Community Development. CITY CLERK Photocopy fees are governed.by the California Public Records Act (CPRA), which limits the fee charged to "the actual direct cost of duplication" (Government Code Section 6256). The CPRA prohibits incorporation of document retrieval costs into the photocopy fee. After evaluating current costs for copier use and maintenance, a copy fee of $0.10 per page for black and white copies and $0.23 for color copies is recommended to be applied to all public record requests, as well as other duplicating citywide for all departments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The City contracted with Maximus, Inc. in 2004 for a comprehensive fee study, which formed the basis for existing fees. The City contracted with Maximus again in 2011 to review the current fees for the Building and Safety Department and the Planning Department and determine if changes were needed. The revised study was completed in 2011 to update existing fees using the same methodology. The total cost of each service was determined based on the fully burdened hourly rates that were determined for City personnel directly involved in providing a service. The fully P176 City Council Staff Report Proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments December 19, 2012 Page 2 burdened hourly rates include personnel salary and benefits as well as department overhead costs (operation costs and administration personnel costs) that are then multiplied by the average estimated number of hours needed to complete each service. The result is the total estimated cost for the City to provide a service. City staff reviews each user fee and past history to determine the average estimated hours for a given service. The amount of time spent on any specific service can vary greatly depending on the complexity of the project. The average estimated hours is based on the amount of time it would take to process a typical application or provide a service, such as an inspection. This does not take into account projects which, due to their complexity, may require an inordinate amount of staff time, or those projects which, due to their simplicity, may require less time. While the purpose of the study was to determine the full cost to the City of providing the service, the City ultimately decides what level of recovery is desired, up to the full cost. Staff reviewed the results of the study and refined the final proposed fees taking into consideration the degree of overall fee change and comparisons to local jurisdictions. The comparison is outlined in the attached Exhibits A and B. This review resulted in fee recommendations that in many cases are lower than the full cost recovery estimated by Maximus. This is part of the City's effort to support the business community by reducing barriers to entry into the local marketplace and ensuring Rancho Cucamonga remains competitive with other local jurisdictions. One of the goals of the Development Review Process Working Group was to leverage technology to lower costs to develop projects and reduce time and delivery of City development services, more specifically to enable electronic submission of plans. Addressing their goal requires upgrades to the current land development and permitting system. The existing permitting system, Tidemark Advantage, was implemented in 1999 and does not support new features required to make the system more customer friendly and provide quantifiable increases to staff productivity. The City contracted with AEF Systems Inc. to evaluate the implementation of a technology fee for land development and building permit services as a way to achieve these system enhancements without increasing the burden on the General Fund. AEF concluded that, based on the preferred permitting software package that would best meet the goals stated above, a technology fee of 7% should be assessed to all development applications in the following departments: Planning, Building and Safety, Engineering, and Fire District. This would have provided payback of the system within 5 years and create an ongoing revenue stream to partially offset the future costs of system upgrades and replacements. After further review, staff recommends implementing a technology fee of 4.5% and allow for a longer payback period. All Community Development fees proposed include the 4.5% technology fee. A report and recommendation for action on the preferred software package for land development services which will be paid from the technology fee is included as a separate item on this agenda. As labor effort and costs associated with the provision of services fluctuates over time, a significant element in the development of fees is the flexibility to remain current. To allow fees to stay current over time, staff recommends an annual automatic adjustment based upon published information relative to costs to provide services. Beginning on July 1, 2014, Community Development fees outlined in the resolution will be adjusted based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31St of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is consistent with the City's past practice in this regard. P177 City Council Staff Report Proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments December 19, 2012 Page 3 Building and Safety Fee Analysis: Exhibit A shows the comparisons of the most common types of projects and the fee categories for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other nearby jurisdictions for both current and full cost/proposed fees. The results of the comparison survey show that even with a technology fee included, Building and Safety fees still fall well within the lower median average of other jurisdictions. A comprehensive list of proposed fees is shown in Section 4 of the resolution. Generally, the proposed new fees are trending downward for most types of projects with only minor increases in select fees due to the adjustments in the average estimated number of hours. However, tenant improvement work shows a slight increase of fees due to the new requirements from the building code regarding ADA regulations and Title 24 energy, which local jurisdictions are required to enforce. As discussed at the December 5, 2012 meeting, the City's desire to support green technology is included in this fee update. The fee for photovoltaic/solar permits was significantly reduced from $319.14 to $183.90 due to the simplified plan check process for these types of projects. Overall, the net effect of the proposed fees indicates there will be a small decrease in permit revenue. Using 2008 permit volume data the fee analysis indicates that the proposed fees will provide a net loss in revenue estimated at $6,000 per year, assuming volume remains constant. Planning Fee Analysis: Staff reviewed each planning application type to determine the average number of hours required to complete the activity. Determinations were made on several application types that the number of hours previously estimated had changed. As a result, all planning fees have been reviewed and updated. A comprehensive list of proposed fees is shown in Section 5 of the resolution. Generally, fees for higher volume applications have been reduced to reflect decreased staff time. However, some development applications require additional staff time due to the complexities of infill development and State CEQA regulations. Examples of application fees where reductions are proposed include: • The current fee for a Home Occupation Permit is $126.00; the proposed cost is now $52.25. • A Tree Removal Permit for single family residential properties is currently $503.00; the proposed fee is $104.50. • Hillside Development Review is currently $6,120; the proposed cost is now $2,090. • Commercial/Industrial Design Review is $11,629; the proposed fee is now $9,823. Staff also compared selected applications with local jurisdictions to guide the determination of the final proposed fees (Exhibit B). Only those applications that most closely correlated to our application types were compared because jurisdictions have different land development application types. That comparison indicates that fees for planning services were generally comparable to the local market. P178 City Council Staff Report Proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments December 19, 2012 Page 4 Overall, the net effect of the proposed fees indicates there will be a small decrease in Planning revenue. Using 2008 application volume data the fee analysis indicates that the proposed fees will provide a net loss in revenue estimated at $61,000 per year, assuming volume remains constant. Engineering Fee Analysis: Engineering fees were updated more recently than the Building and Safety and Planning Departments and therefore were not included in the study conducted by Maximus, Inc. Engineering land development fees are only recommended to be augmented with the 4.5% technology fee as shown in Section 6 of the resolution. Development Impact Fees are not subject to the technology fee. The Engineering Department will perform a fee study during the 2013/2014 fiscal year. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEES Pursuant to section 66017 of the California Government Code, "a fee or charge...upon a development project...which applies to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use" shall become effective and payable sixty (60) days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. Fees for photocopy services will become effective immediately. FIRE DISTRICT The Fire District is also submitting for your consideration revised fees as well as the implementation of the technology fee in a companion staff report. PUBLIC OUTREACH Prior to the public hearing, staff met separately with representatives from the Building Industry Association of Southern California — Baldy View Chapter (BIA) and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce (Chamber) to present the proposed Building and Safety, Planning and Technology fees. Staff addressed all questions raised by both groups subsequent to their respective meetings and neither group indicated an objection to the proposed revisions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 60016, a copy of the fee studies for City Clerk, Building and Safety, Planning and Technology fees were made available to the public through the City Clerk of Rancho Cucamonga and online through the City's website 12 days in advance of the public hearing. The City will continue the practice of posting notices and making fee schedules available at the public counter and on the City's website for each affected department 30 days prior to any fee change. PUBLIC NOTICE This is a recommendation to adopt updated photocopy and user fees affecting all parcels within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised 12 days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No individual notice to property owners was provided. P179 City Council Staff Report Proposed Fee Amendments for Various City Departments December 19, 2012 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. Bloom Lori Sassoon Deputy City Manager/ Deputy City Manager/ Economic and Community Development Administrative Services JAB:JN/vv Attachments: Exhibit A - Select Building and Safety Fee Comparison to Nearby Jurisdictions Exhibit B - Select Planning Fee Comparison to Nearby Jurisdictions Draft City Council Resolution adopting new user fees for various City services. P180 C o d _ N (,) 0 t C o a e t0 0 o e e to O tD R N h C to tp co N E � Z to M to � to tq Cl) to rn m U m rn m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 > d u! N tC N O tO ltt N O O Q LL Ch d' ^ h O tp C r, co l0 Nts 69 ^ CSI H6'? tR tR (U LL t0 O O C C) C. O O O O O O O O 0 0 Co @ C O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O ° ° O O O O O O w O OD w O OD N O ° M G M 6 � N 6 O Q t0 r O h co j V' (D 'T � O ti O 6 M O O to V (D O o OD to p to pi C M o T (D (D tD to M N N 7 O O N M N C O (O to to O Q LL 69 N 69 N4 6,) tR 69 EA U) t/) 6q 64 � M LC)4 f/ Ef3 3 t 69 tR m O H O O O to V' to 2' o O o o O O o o O o o C O' N r M m = V = 9 = CO � W C, (O t- W Cfi ri td CD Cn O V h R �' (D O o) m (O M CA (fl CD C LO N a M C O (D O) o D) to (o W O V M _ N to m 64 69 O 69 O O Ln -7 00 O N P- (n ff3 ER Efl Efl 04 69 6f3 - 69 Efl � C4 �04 M tR RS O u O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O L O O O O O O o p 0 O O O O O O p p O O o O tp ti O O Cl to N O � to Oj C V r O O �; N O IT E - N N V N N N (O (P V V O O p O C M ° M O V' N tD V N t0 O) (D M L6 c O to M O)co In � U a � 69 � � � to � � 69 � � 1H to O to M o o ° eo o ao 0 0 0 o co o col'a to o rn (`•> o r` o to to to to 0 0 0 o 0 CO to m m l6 N to to O N to 0o O to r N � (D CR O V/ M W C C C ° M w (D (o co (O (O N (O to N O tf t( O V CL O N V O N to CO O V N ti L O 10 O U = ER N 69 Efl ' V CO O M V 00 N M N N N tR tR Z 69 eR tR Ef3 64 w EA fA w ER 63 tR tR to EA tR jach C 0 0 o O O O O O O O a. O O O O O O p N CD o N to to V O I� to N tO w 0 -e to M co (n 0 � CO co 16 (�D OOD U N L c fA C'D O (R m W N o N N r tt) N 00 O M N D M N r f) (D - � N - N � 69 FR 69 EA o 69 6D 9 fA �; 69 EA to E t O Q � CO r to _ 00 to CD Co �- M O N 00 O O CR (o tp O (A V N � O � M C' h CO In M O N Cb N r O to m 0 3 I� O r W O N V O to U 01 CO M (D tp N � �; (T N N N M r V C7 tb CO h lo- OD tp C r of p M N w N (o T M V r f` /y� d O Z N O N m lm V CD Of N (A (P tp W O N a) r 00 O M tp LL E v 69 N be 69 64 tR V M N CO N CO Ef3 N 64 N V co co tR m 69 IR fR 69 EA fA EA 69 M EA 69 69 4H ff3 fA V). U- 0 'a U /1 •� O +�-' (b 1n O Cn Co O N O O Cl) CO lA }I t C h o Ln U.) m w N O N O W N O V O p I� M W U V y O ('n O _ OT O M CO OR M N O U C Co � M to M N t` O N r O 0) tp w M O V N N to N O f` V' (P N a) e N CD Lo M to CA ar Q O M h Co M V M 00 N M V lf7 O fn o h m h CP r- tp N tO ,^ U N to fR 69 EA tR V' M M N tO 69 69 ff) to V M tq tR to 613 ffa tR (A 69 tR tR tR Efl EA tR U C U C O C O C O C O C U C O C (1) O N O O O N O W O a) O 0) O O O U U U O U O U V U O _ U L) _ U C) U O C Op_ 16 C D_ tlf C D_ R C d 10 C O_ la C (1 la C O_ A C p_ m ltS lti f° N o ° U) o m o m N o m N o m N o m N o �° N o 0 0 d s r a r a S r a E r n_ E r a_ s r a S r a -S� r I r r c c aa)) m o. op o 0 0 °o rn U 0 c o m E z a E U M aai to Q £ OZS II p m L) O �c _ O N � C r C O C C0 V 'D 11 - w O �O w a) d w 3 C O_- J O V to V y CO Q R (� N CJ r N' U r Q t C) N "r 3 CT mE E .o °O .2 a °O Z °o U °° Q ° m ° ° o Q ° N L m `O EO co d -0 O 4) O _ d p to o Z N o o 10 o m o O to ~ tl 2 Q N - N O In j d' N tl V C EXHIBIT A i P181 0 0 o 0 0 LO O co M ti I, co M Q 5rt CV ol O p) Cn O O U) U-) 0 00 O cu 5 t h! �j LO CO 0 ti > � ,LL N N e NEfl 69 69 69 Eg H4 � Lf) O U) O 00 Lo L) N r 'O '? N Cl N. V -7 CO N ti U) ' 00 O N Lf) O ti O Ln N, k Old r-- r-- LO N N f-- r ti O. r- O ` N (6 69 69 69 E9 nj L ( 69 EA a ,4 1- o �c= o 0 0 0 ° - O O LO o CD LO U)5—;69 69 69 •= VC�_5O N O � CO U) 00 f ti •� O', ti N 'It w�+ai.'.64 69 69 N EF) 69 6H . C ML 4 E C1 fer.sO; CA Z O ;G' (02 I` -,t N co 06 Q = 69 64 E9 69 V 010 O c Cu � '� s Hra.r •C 0. +O+ 'o,_C O O l[7 •C �� CO LOC•) 00 O O f N E cu CN C-4 c jL v m. :g Cu LL3 - ,«. �. LO LO LO LO 'C O C= cc rn o 0 Ln a rte+ O � 00 f N f N U) C6 V3 O` 69 E9 N Lc) Ur(> 69 ER 69 64 x V � � rh fd; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L1 0 0 0 0 `u. r+ 0) CO N CO 000 69 69 r LO N cu N E9 ff! E!3 CV L cu �+.;7•Cf? 69 69 � z 4 u yam? y O E E -O O C O C d. .. .. E CV C g I]' 0 N O Q. "O C cu 7 ? O O U O d . O V LC O C c4. rn Cv C Cl) O .� a 0 C O CD U —� >� C C E U N E LO W E m a m c > E ° c a o 2 > _ c m E E c a� O ai O cu ._ m ._ cu q C ° = ~ ~ ' EXHIBIT P182 RESOLUTION NO. 12-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE FOR APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 06-032 AND REPEALING RESOLUTIONS O4-293, 06-283 AND 12-101. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On December 19, 2012, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth in Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 for do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby adopts the following fees for photocopy services. Copy Type Copy Charge Black and White, all standard sizes $0.10 per page Color, all standard sizes $0.23 per page SECTION 4: The City Council hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Building and Safety Department, including a technology fee of 4.5%. P183 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 2 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 1 Standard Hourly Rate $118.63 $132.60 Fire Sprinkler Systems 2 1-20 Heads per floor ors stem $137.78 $150.69 3 21-100 Heads per floor ors stem $308.77 $337.54 4 101-200 Heads per floor ors stem $419.03 $458.08 5 201 -350 Heads per floor ors stem $474.17 $518.34 6 351 + per floor ors stem $584.44 $638.89 Fire Sprinkler-Tenant Improvements: 7 1-4 Heads per floor ors stem $143.49 $156.75 8 5-20 Heads per floor ors stem $198.49 $216.94 9 21-100 Heads per floor ors stem $258.26 $282.33 10 101-200 Heads per floor ors stem $474.17 $518.32 11 201 - 350 Heads per floor ors stem $474.17 $518.32 12 351 + per floor ors stem $584.44 $638.89 Additional Fire Sprinkler Review Items 13 Hydraulic Calculation er remote area $143.36 $156.75 14 Antifreeze Sytem per system $88.22 $96.45 15 Dry Pipe Valve per valve $88.22 $96.45 16 Deluge/Preaction per valve $88.22 $96.45 17 Fire Cycle per system $33.08 $36.16 18 Pressure Reducing Station per valve $88.22 $96.45 19 Fire Pump per pump $253.63 $277.26 Water Storage Tank 20 Gravity per tank $143.36 $156.75 21 Pressure pertank $33.08 $36.16 Fire Stand pi e System 22 Class I, II, III &Article 81 per outlet $143.35 $156.75 Fire Alarm System 23 0-15 Devices' per system $143.36 $156.75 24 16-50 Devices per system $198.49 $216.32 25 51-100 Devices per system $308.77 $337.54 26 101-500 Devices per system $308.77 $337.54 27 for each additional 25 devices up to 1,000 per system $88.22 $96.45 28 1001+ per system $727.78 $795.60 29 for each additional 100 devices er system $88.22 $96.45 * Devices =All Initiating and indicating appliances Additional Fire Alarm Review Items 30 Dampers each $88.22 $96.45 31 Hi/ Lo Alarms each $88.22 $96.45 32 Low air/temp Alarms each $88.22 $96.45 33 Graph c Annunciator Review each $88.22 $96.45 34 Hazardous activities or uses P184 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 3 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 35 Installation Permits 36 Clean Agent Gas Systems each $253.63 $277.26 37 Dry Chemical Systems each $198.49 $216.97 38 Wet Chemical/Kitchen Hood each $363.89 $397.80 39 Foam Systems . each $474.17 $518.32 40 Paint Spray Booth each $308.77 $337.54 41 Vehicle Access Gate each $143.36 $156.75 42 Monitoring each $474.20 $518.32 43 Pro ane Tank LPG each $253.63 $277.26 Above Ground - Flammable/Combustibule Liquid 44 Tank Wor Pie per site $474.17 $518.32 Under Ground - Flammable/Combustibule Liquid 45 Tank Wor Pie per site $474.17 $518.32 46 Fuel Dispensing System Complete per site $474.17 $518.32 47 High Piled / Rack/Shelf Storage each $474.17 $518.32 48 Smoke Control UFC Article 81 each $308.77 $337.54 49 Smoke Control IBC Chapter 9 each $308.77 $337.54 50 Nurse Call $143.36 $156.75 51 Medical Gas Alarms $251.58 $275.02 Medical Gas Level 1 (Hospital) $0.00 52 1-36 outlets group $363.89 $397.80 53 each additional 36 group $363.89 $0.00 Medical Gas Level 2 Dental w/oxygen) $0.00 54 1-36 outlets group $363.89 $397.80 55 each additional 36 group $363.89 Medical Gas Level 3 Dental per system $143.36 $156.75 56 Refrigerant System each $251.58 $277.26 57 Refrigerant Monitoring System each $143.36 Renewable Permits 58 Aerosol products a.1 per permit $363.89 $397.80 59 Aircraft refueling vehicles a.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 60 Aircraft repair hanger a.3 per permit $253.63 $277.26 61 Automobile wrecking and a.5 per permit $253.63 $277.26 62 Battery system b.1 per permit $143.36 $156.75 63 Candles and open flames in assembly areas c.1 per permit $143.36 $156.75 64 Cellulose nitrate film c.3 per permit $143.36 $156.75 65 Cellulose nitrate storage c.4 per permit $143.36 $156.75 66 Cellulose fiber storage c.5 per permit $143.36 $156.75 67 1 Combustible material storage c.6 per permit $143.36 $156.75 P185 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 4 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 68 Compressed gases c.7 per permit $198.49 $216.94 69 Commercial rubbish-handling operation c.8 per permit $253.63 $277.26 70 Cr o ens c.9 per permit $253.63 $277.26 71 Dry cleaning plants d.1 per permit $198.49 $216.94 72 Dust-producing operations d.2 per ermit $426.75 Exposives or blasting agenst, use or transportation 73 e.1 per permit $446.56 $488.17 74 Fire; manufacture, compound, store, sale f.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 Flammable or combustibule liquids; pipelines; store, 75 handle, use f.3 per permit $446.56 $488.17 76 Fruit ripening f.4 per ermit $198.49 $216.94 77 Fumigation or thermal insecticide fogging f.5 per permit $143.36 $156.75 Hazardous materials; store, transport on site, 78 dispense, use, handle h.1 per permit $474.17 $488.17 79 High-piled combustible storage h.2 per ermit $530.11 $579.50 80 Hot-works operations h.3 per permit $253.63 $277.26 Liquefied petroleum gases, store, use, handle, 81 dispense 1.1 per permit $253.63 $277.26 82 Lumber yards 1.3 per permit $198.49 $216.94 83 Ma nesium working m.1 per permit $198.49 $216.94 84 Motor vehicle fuel-dispensing stations m.3 per permit $363.89 $397.80 85 Or anic coatings o.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 86 Places of assembly .2 per permit $446.56 $488.17 87 Radioactive materials r.1 per permit $363.89 $397.80 88 Refri eration equipment; o erate r.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 89 Repair garages r.3 per permit $412.01 $458.08 90 Spraying or dipping s.1 per ermit $412.01 $458.08 91 Tire storage t.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 92 Wood roducts w.1 per permit $426.75 $437.57 Activity Permits (Single Event-One Time 93 Bowling in or alley refinishing b.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 94 Candles and open flames in assembly areas b.2 per permit $143.36 $156.75 95 Carnivals and fairs c.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 96 Explosive or blasting agents; use, dispose e.1 per permit $426.75 $437.57 97 Fireworks; displays f.2 per permit $253.63 $277.26 98 Hot work operations h.3 per permit $253.63 $277.26 99 Li uefied petroleum asses; install containers 1.1 per permit $198.49 $216.94 Liquid-or gas-fueled vehicles or equipment in 100 assembly buildings 1.2 per permit $198.49 $216.94 101 Mall, covered m.2 per permit $694.70 $759.42 102 Open burning o.1 per permit $143.36 $156.75 103 Parade floats .1 per permit $143.36 $156.75 P186 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 5 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 104 Pyrotechnical special effects material .3 per permit $198.49 $216.94 Temporary membrane structures, tents, and canopies 105 t.1 per permit $121.30 $277.26 Reports 106 Life Safety Report per hour $121.30 $132.60 107 Hazardous Material Inventory Statement per hour $121.30 $132.60 108 Hazardous Material Management Plan per hour $121.30 $132.60 Other Fire Fees: 109 Hydrants/Underground Fire Service Plan Check each $481.96 110 Hydrant Flow Test(existing hydrants) each $121.30 $132.60 111 Fire Plans Examiner Special each $121.30 $132.60 112 Reins ection Fee per hour $33.08 $132.60 Note: The above fees cover typical projects. Fees for certain unique or similar projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building and Safety Director. It will be based on the overhead hourly rate and the time of service provided. MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee Stand Alone Mechanical Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check 1 Plan Check hour) rate hour) rate $118.63 $132.60 UNIT FEES: Install/Relocate forced air or gravity-type furnace or burner(including attached ducts and vents) up to and including 100,000 2 A/C, Residential each Btu/h each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate forced air or gravity-type furnace or burner(including attached ducts and vents)over 100,000 Btu/h (each) $95.16 $99.44 Instal/Relocate floor furnace, including 3 Floor furnace vent each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate suspended heater, recessed wall heater, or floor-mounted unit 4 Unit Heaters heater each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate/Replace appliance vent installed and not included in an appliance 5 Appliance Vent permit each $95.16 $99.44 P187 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 6 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee Repair/Alter/Add heating appliance, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporative cooling system, including 6 Refrigeration Unit installation of controls each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate boiler or compressor, up to and including 3HP, or absorption system 7 Boiler<3hp up to and including 100,000 Btu/h (each) $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate boiler or compressor, over 3HP and up to and including 15 HP, or absorption system over 100,000 Btu/h and 8 Boiler>3hp>16hp up to and including 500,000 Btu/h each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate boiler or compressor, over 15HP and up to and including 30 HP, or absorption system over 500,000 Btu/h and 9 Boiler 16 <30hp up to and including 1,000,000 Btu/h each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate boiler or compressor, over 30HP and up to and including 50 HP, or absorption system over 1,000,000 Btu/h and up to and including 1,750,000 Btu/h 10 Boiler 30 <50h each $95.16 $99.44 Install/Relocate boiler or compressor, over 50HP or absorption system over 1,750,000 11 >50h Btu/h each $95.16 $99.44 Air-handling unit, including attached ducts. (Note: this fee shall not apply to an air- handling unit that is a portion of a factory- assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler, or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere) 12 Air Handling Units <10K each $95.16 $99.44 13 Air Handling Units >10K Air-handling over 10,000 CFM each $95.16 $99.44 Moisture Exhaust Duct 14 Clothes Dryer) Clothes Dryers Exhaust Ducts $95.16 $99.44 Evaporative Cooler other 15 than portable type Evaporative Cooler $95.16 $99.44 Ventilation fan connected to a single duct 16 Vent Fan, Single Duct each each $95.16 $99.44 Ventilation system that is not a portion of any heating or air-conditioning system 17 Vent System authorized by a permit each $95.17 $99.45 Hood installation that is served by Exhaust Hood and Duct mechanical exhaust, including the ducts 18 (Residential) for such hood (each) $95.17 $99.45 P188 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 7 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee Exhaust Hood, Type 1 19 Commercial Grease Hood Grease Hoods $95.17 $99.45 Exhaust Hood, Type II 20 Commercial Steam Hood Steam Hoods $95.17 $99.45 OTHER FEES: Other Mechanical 21 Inspections(per hour Other Mechanical Inspections (per hour $126.89 $132.60 Stand Alone Plumbing Plan Stand Alone Plumbing Plan Check (hourly 22 Check hour) rate rate) $126.89 $132.60 UNIT FEES: Plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap, including water, drainage 23 Plumbing Fixtures each piping, and backflow protection each $95.17 24 Gas System $95.17 $99.45 First Outlet Gas System $95.17 $99.45 Each Additional Outlet $63.44 $66.30 25 Building Sewer Building or Trailer park sewer each $126.89 $132.60 Private sewage disposal Septic tanks and seepage pits or pits 26 system each and/or drainfield $222.05 $232.04 Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors 27 Grease Trap functioning as fixture traps each $95.17 $99.45 28 Water Heater Water Heater and/or vent each $95.17 $99.45 Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen-type grease interceptors 29 Grease Inceptor functioning as fixture traps each $95.17 $99.45 30 Water Piping Install/Alter/Repair water piping and/or First 5 fixtures water treating equipment each $95.17 $99.45 Repair/Alter drainage or vent piping (each Each after the First 5 fixture) $95.17 $99.45 Roof Drain-Rainwater Rainwater system inside building (per 31 System drain) $95.17 $99.45 Lawn sprinkler system on any one meter, including backflow protection devices 32 Lawn S rinkers therefore each $126.89 $132.60 Backflow devices not included in other fee services, e.g., building/trailer park sewer 33 Water Heater each $95.17 $99.45 P189 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 8 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee- Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers no included in other fee service, ie: 34 Backflow Preventer building/trailer park sewer 1-5 units $95.17 $99.45 Atmospheric-type vacuum breakers no included in other fee service, ie: 35 Backflow Preventer building/trailer park sewer over 5 units $126.89 $132.60 Water Pipe 36 Repair/Replacement For repair or replacement of water piping $95.17 $99.45 For repair or replacement of drainage/vent 37 Drain-Vent Repair/Alterations piping $95.17 $99.45 Solar panels, tanks, water treatment 38 Solar Water System Fixtures equipment $190.33 $198.90 Graywater Systems (per 39 hour) $158.61 $165.75 Medical Gas System (Each 40 Outlet) $95.17 $99.45 Tankless water heater unit and/or vent 41 Tankless waterheater each $63.44 $66.29 OTHER FEES: Other Plumbing and Gas Other Plumbing and Gas Inspections (per 42 Inspections (per hour hour) $126.89 $132.60 Stand Alone Electrical Plan Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check (hourly 43 Check hour) rate rate) $132.60 SYSTEM FEES: Private, Residential, In- ground Swimming Pools each new $95.17 $99.45 Includes a complete system of necessary branch circuit wiring, bonding, grounding, underwater lighting, water pumping, and other similar electrical equipment directly related to the operation of a swimming 44 Residential Swimming Pools pool $95.17 $99.45 For all other types of swimming pools, therapeutic whirlpools, spas, hot tubs and 45 Spas and Hot Tubs alterations to existing swimming pools $95.17 $99.45 Outdoor Events Carnivals, circuses, or other traveling shows or exhibitions utilizing transportable-type rides, booths, displays, 46 Carnival Rides and attractions $95.17 $99.45 Electric generator and electrically-driven 47 Electrical Generators rides each $95.17 $99.45 P190 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 9 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee- Mechanically-driven rides and walk- through attractions or displays having 48 Walk-thru attractions electric lighting each 49 Booth Lighting System of area and booth lighting each Temporary Service power pole or pedestal, including all pole or pedestal- mounted receptacle outlets and 50 Temporary Service each appurtenances $158.61 $165.75 Temporary distribution system and temporary lighting and receptacle outlets for constructions sites, decorative light, Christmas tree sales lots, firework stands, 51 Temporary Pole each sales booths, additional poles, etc. $158.61 $165.75 Branch circuit fees apply to new branch circuit wiring and the lighting fixtures switches and receptacles which are supplied by these branch circuit, including BRANCH CIRCUIT FEES their outlets 52 First 10 or portion thereof First 10 or portion thereof $63.44 $66.30 Each additional 10(or 53 portion thereof) Each additional 10 or portion thereof $63.44 $66.30 NOTE: (For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet UNIT FEES: Receptacle, switch, lighting, or other outlets at which current is used or Receptacle, Switch, and controlled, except services, feeders, and Lighting Outlets meters 15 or 20 amp, first 10 circuits 54 each First 10 or portion thereof $63.44 $66.29 15 or 20 amp, next 90 55 circuits each Each additional 10 or portion thereof $63.44 $66.29 15 or 20 amp, over 100 56 circuits each Each additional 10 or portion thereof $63.44 $66.29 (For multi-outlet assemblies, each 5 feet or fraction thereof may be considered as one outlet 57 25 to 40 amp circuits each 25 to 40 amp circuits each $63.44 $66.29 58 50 to 175 amp circuits each 50 to 175 amp circuits each $63.44 $66.29 200 amp and larger circuits 59 each 200 amp and larger circuits each $63.44 $66.29 Lighting Fixtures, sockets, or other lamp- Lighting Fixtures holding devices P191 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 10 MECHANICAL,ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee 60 25 to 40 amp circuits each First 10 $63.44 $66.29 61 Each additional 10 $63.44 $66.29 62 50 to 175 amp circuits each First 10 $63.44 $66.29 63 Each additional 10 $63.44 $66.29 Pole or platform-mounted lighting fixtures 64 Pole Lights each $63.44 $66.29 Theatrical-type lighting fixtures or 65 Theater Lighting assemblies each $63.44 $66.29 Fixed residential appliances or receptacle outlets for same, including wall-mounted electric ovens; counter mounted cooking tops; electric ranges; self-contained room console or through-wall air conditioners; space heaters; food waste grinders; 66 Residential Appliances dishwasher $63.44 $66.29 For any appliance installed in a non- residential occupancy and not exceeding three(3) horsepower(HP), kilowatt(KW), or kiovolt-ampere(KVA) in rating, including medical and dental devices, food, beverage, and ice cream cabinets, 67 Nonresidential Appliances illuminated showcases, $63.44 $66.29 Motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, synchronous converters, capacitors, industrial heating, air conditioners and heat pumps, cooking or baking equipment, and other apparatus. Rating in horsepower(HP), kilowatts(kW), Power Apparatus or kilovolt-amperes (kVA), 68 Up to and including 1 each Up to and including 1 each $105.74 $110.50 Over 1 and not over 10 69 each Over 1 and not over 10 each $105.74 $110.50 Over 10 and not over 50 70 each Over 10 and not over 50 each $105.74 $110.50 Over 50 and not over 100 71 each Over 50 and not over 100 each $105.74 $110.50 72 Over 100 each Over 100 each $105.74 $110.50 NOTE: For equipment or appliances having more than one motor, transformer, heater, etc. the sum of the combined rating may be used. These fees include all switches, circuit breakers, contactors, thermostats, relays, and other directly related control e u P192 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 11 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee Trolley and plug-in-type busways -each 73 Buswa s 100 or fraction thereof $105.74 $110.50 NOTE: An additioinal fee will be required for lighting fixtures, motors, and other appliances and are connected to trolley and plug-in-type busways. No fee is required for portable tools. Signs, Outline Lighting, and Signs, Outline Lighting, or Marquees 74 Marquees supplied from one branch circuit each $126.89 $132.60 Additional branch circuits within the same sign, outline lighting system, or marquee 75 each $31.72 $33.15 Services of 600 volts or less, up to 399 76 Services amperes in rating each $63.44 $66.29 Services of 600 volts or less, 400 to 1000 77 amperes in rating each $63.44 $66.29 Services over 600 volts or over 1000 78 amperes in atin each $63.44 $66.29 Electrical apparatus, conduits, and Miscellaneous Apparatus, conductors for which a permit is required, 79 Conduits, and Conductors but for which no fee is herein set forth $63.44 $66.29 (This fee is not applicable when a fee is paid for one or more services, outlets, fixtures, appliances, power apparatus, busways, signs, or other equipment) Photovoltaic Systems(each) 80 -up to 10kw Residential $183.90 $192.18 Photovoltaic Systems (each) 81 - up to 10kw Commercial $183.90 $192.18 systems above 10kw will be charged an hourly rate of 82 $126.89 OTHER FEES: Other Electrical Inspections 83 (per hour Other Electrical Inspections (per hour $126.89 $132.60 Inspections outside of normal business hours, 0-2 hours Inspections outside of normal business 84 minimum charge) hours, 0-2 hours minimum charge) $190.33 $198.89 85 Reinspection Fee per hour Reins ection Fee per hour $126.89 $132.60 Inspections for which no fee is specifically indicated, per Inspections for which no fee is specifically hour(minimum charge = 1/2 indicated -per hour(minimum charge = 86 hour) 1/2 hour) $126.89 $132.60 P193 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 12 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND PLUMBING FEES Current Fee Types Fee Description Fees New Fee Additional Plan Review required by changes, Additional Plan Review required by additions, or revisions to changes, additions, or revisions to approved plans, per hour approved plans, per hour(minimum 87 minimum charge = 1/2 hour charge = 1/2 hour) $63.44 $66.30 Note: The above fees cover typical projects. Fees for certain unique or similar projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building and Safety Director. It will be based on the overhead hourly rate and the time of service provided. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 1 Standard Hourly Rate $118.63 $132.60 Antenna Structure 2 • Equipment Container each $121.30 $132.60 3 • 0-30 ft antenna each $121.30 $132.60 4 • 31+ft antenna each $121.30 $132.60 Cellular/Mobile Phone, tower,free- 5 standing each $121.30 $132.60 6 Cellular Tower with Equipment Shelter each $1,632.01 $1,127.09 7 Tent/Awning or Canopy over 120sgft each $90.42 $98.75 8 Balcony addition up to 1000s ft each $196.29 $213.07 9 Carport without calc. each $90.42 $98.75 10 Carport with Calcs each $241.50 $243.10 11 Change of Occupancy(no T.I.) each $1,510.72 $508.30 12 Close Existing Openings $175.07 $187.85 13 Interior wall new each $302.15 $243.10 14 Exterior wall new each $242.60 $265.20 15 Commercial Coach per unit each unit $302.15 $327.50 16 Compliance Inspections each $121.30 $132.60 17 Deck wood -(City handout each $121.30 $132.60 18 Deck wood with Calcs each $302.15 $309.40 19 Demolition each $90.42 $99.38 20 Demolition - MultiFamil /Commercial each $121.30 $132.60 • Pre-Demolition Inspection first hour each $0.00 $0.00 • Pre-Demolition Ins each add'I hour hourly rate $0.00 Door 21 • New door non structural each $151.06 $165.11 P194 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 13 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee -New door(structural shear 22 wall/masonry) each $151.06 $165.11 Fence Wall non-mason -w/Calcs 23 • 3 - 10 feet in height $180.85 $196.25 24 • Each additional 50 If each 50 I.f. $60.64 $65.84 25 • Over 10 feet in height $262.78 $287.30 Fence or Freestanding Wall mason • Masonry, (3-10 feet high) include 26 pilaster $186.82 $204.22 27 • Each additional 501 If- include pilaster each 50 I.f. $60.64 .$65.84 -Masonry, Special Design (3'-10' high) 28 w/pilaster per 50 I.f. $186.82 $204.22 29 -Each additional 50 If include pilaster each 50 I.f. $151.07 $165.75 -Masonry, Special Design (over 10' high) 30 w/pilaster up to 50 I.f. $242.60 $265.20 31 -Each additional 50 If w/pilaster each 50 I.f. $60.64 $65.84 Fireplace 32 • Masonry w/city handout each $151.06 $132.60 33 • Masonry with Calcs each $151.06 $165.75 34 • Pre-Fabricated/ Metal (ICC model each $151.06 $132.60 35 Flag pole over 20 feet in height) each $121.30 $132.60 36 Garage detached or attached 37 •Wood frame up to 1,000 s.f. each $302.15 $331.49 38 • Masonry up to 1,000 s.f. or other material each $302.15 $397.80 39 • > 1,000 s.f. wood or masonry or others each $302.15 1 $331.49 Grading Cut and Fill • 0-50 Cubic Yards(Cut and Fill)- 40 Exempted $0.00 $0.00 • 51-100 CY -SWPPP/EC/SOILS/AS- 41 BUILT/DUST SIGN $302.15 $331.49 42 • Each Add'I 100 CY or portion thereof $60.64 $232.05 • 1,000 CY(minimum)- 43 SWPPP/EC/SOILS/AS-BUILT/DUST SIGN $967.08 $784.54 44 • Each Add'1 1,000 CY or portion thereof $36.39 $232.05 • 10,000 CY(minimum)- 45 SWPPP/EC/SOILS/AS-BUILT/DUST SIGN $1,329.87 $1,149.19 46 • Each Add'I 10,000 CY or portion thereof $73.89 $320.45 • 100,000 CY(minimum)- 47 SWPPP/EC/SOILS/AS-BUILT/DUST SIGN $1,993.70 $1,745.89 48 • Each Add'I 100,000 CY or portion thereof $73.89 $486.20 Private Street Improvement 49 • Water&Sewer: 1-10 homes per tract $241.48 $265.20 P195 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 14 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee 50 • Water&Sewer: 15 lots $848.00 $927.00 -Water&Sewer: 5 acre 51 retail/commercial/Industrial $241.48 $265.20 52 -Water&Sewer: 5 acres or more site $756.75 $828.75 Hydrology/hydraulic Report: single 53 custom lot $241.49 $198.90 Hydrology/hydraulic Report: 1-5 ac. 54 Multi. Res. Home $604.28 $331.50 Hydrology/hydraulic Report: 5 acres or 55 more site residential $121.30 $132.60 Hydrology/hydraulic Report: 5 acres 56 comm./industrial $725.58 $331.50 Hydrology/hydraulic Report:: 5 acres or 57 more comm./indus. $725.58 $464.10 Water Quality Management Plan: 58 • 1-5 acres all development $362.79 $397.80 59 • every additional 5 acres sites $121.30 $132.60 60 Greenhouse(non-commercial) structure each $121.30 $132.60 Greenhouse(non-commercial) (with 61 Calcs) each $121.30 $132.60 62 Lighting ole each $156.07 $132.60 63 • each add'I pole each $156.07 $33.15 64 Mobile Home each $186.82 $204.20 65 Mobile Home, double wide each $186.82 $204.20 Partition -Commercial, Interior(up to 66 100 I.f.) up to 100 I.f. $302.15 $221.00 67 • Additional partition up to 100 If each 100 I.f. $81.29 $88.40 • Partition - Residential, Interior(up to 68 100 I.f.) up to 100 I.f. $302.15 $221.00 69 • Additional partition up to 100 If each 100 I.f. $40.63 $44.20 70 Patio Cover/Porch or similar $121.30 71 •Wood frame(City handout uD to 500 s.f. $302.15 $209.95 72 •Wood frame with Calcs up to 500 s.f. $302.15 $243.10 73 • Metal frame up to 500 s.f. $302.15 $243.10 74 • Other framing material up to 500 s.f. $302.15 $243.10 75 • Additional patio up to 500 s.f. $141.91 $154.70 76 Enclosed patio up to 500 s.f. $725.59 $221.00 77 • Enclosed, wood frame with Calcs up to 500 s.f. $725.59 $309.40 78 • Enclosed, metal frame up to 500 s.f. $725.59 $243.10 79 • Enclosed, metal frame with Calcs up to 500 s.f. $725.59 $309.40 80 • Enclosed, other framing material up to 500 s.f. $121.30 $243.10 81 • Additional enclosed patio up to 500 s.f. $141.90 $154.70 P196 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 15 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee Photovoltaic System 82 (residential)/(Commercial) per KWh $585.00 $640.90 Private Sewage Disposal Plan Review- 83 Septic $149.43 $165.75 84 • Pre-Plan Inspection each add'I hour hourly rate $60.64 $66.29 85 Stucco Applications re-stucco up to 1500 s.f. $90.42 $99.45 86 • Additional Stucco Application each 1500 s.f. $90.42 $99.45 87 • Relocated Building each $576.18 $640.90 Retaining Wall (concrete or masonry 88 • First 100 l.f. (city handout up to 100 I.f. $211.72 $232.04 89 • Additional retaining wall each 100 I.f. $60.64 $66.31 90 • Special Design, 3-10' high (up to 100 If up to 100 I.f. $302.15 $331.49 91 • Additional retaining wall each 100 l.f. $60.64 $66.31 • Special Design, over 10' high (up to 100 92 If) up to 100 l.f. $467.57 $511.13 93 • Additional retaining wall each 100 I.f.. $60.64 $66.31 94 • Gravity/Crib Wall - First 100 If up to 100 I.f.. $438.72 $375.70 95 • Additional Gravity/Crib Wall each 100 l.f. $60.64 $66.31 • Gravity/Crib Wall, over 10' high (up to 96 100 If) up to 100 I.f. $467.57 $442.00 97 • Additional Gravity/Crib Wall each 100 I.f. $60.64 $66.31 Remodel -Residential 98 • 500 s.f. Single Story up to 500 s.f. $845.77 $861.89 99 • Additional remodel each 500 s.f. $242.33 $265.20 Re-roofing 100 • Tile/Shake-first 500 sf up to 500 s.f. $696.90 $397.80 101 • Each additional 500 s.f. each 500 s.f. $606.49 $99.45 102 • Comp/Metal -first 500 s.f. up to 500 s.f.. $90.42 $99.44 103 • Each additional 500 s.f. each 500 s.f. $90.42 $99.44 Roof Structure Replacement up to 500 s.f. $845.78 $685.09 104 • Additional roof structure replacement each 500 s.f.. $422.88 $375.70 Room Addition - First Story 105 • Up to 1000 s.f. without calcs up to 1000 s.f. $845.78 $802.14 106 • Up to 1000 s.f. with Calcs up to 1000 s.f. $845.78 $934.75 • Additional room addition (over 1000 107 s.f.) each 1000 s.f. $845.78 $265.20 • Additional room addition (over 1000 s.f. 108 with Calcs) each 1000 s.f. $363.90 $397.80 Room Addition - Multi-story 109 • Up to 1000 s.f. without calcs up to 1000 s.f. $967.08 $926.30 110 • Up to 1000 s.f. with Calcs up to 1000 s.f. $967.08 $1,988.98 111 • Additional room addition over 500 s.f. each 1000 s.f. $967.08 $1,988.98 P197 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 16 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee • Additional room addition (over 500 s.f. 112 with Calcs) each 1000 s.f. $967.08 $397.80 113 Sauna-steam each $444.68 $486.20 Siding • Stone and Brick Veneer(interior or 114 exterior) up to 400 s.f. $90.42 $99.44 115 • All Others up to 400 s.f. $90.42 $99.44 116 • Additional siding each 400 s.f. $90.42 $99.45 Signs 117 • Permanent each $90.42 $99.44 118 • Temporary each $90.42 $99.44 119 • Directional each $60.64 $66.29 120 • Each additional Directional Sin each $60.64 $66.30 121 • Freeway sin each $967.08 . $1,060.80 122 • Freeway sign with Master Plan each $967.08 $1,060.80 123 • Ground / Roof/Projecting Signs each $186.82 $204.22 124 Master Plan Sign Check each $0.00 125 Replacement- Permit Sticker each $0.00 126 Rework of any existing Ground Sign each $186.82 $204.22 127 Subdivision Directional Sign each $186.82 $204.22 128 Wall/Awning Sign, Non-Electric each $121.30 $132.60 129 Wall Sign, Electric each $156.07 $165.75 -Skylight 130 -Less than 10 sf each $60.64 $66.29 131 • Greater than 10 sf w/structural remodel each $358.38 $198.89 132 Spa or Hot Tub (Pre-fabricated) each $90.42 $99.44 133 Stairs - First Stair first flight $211.71 $232.04 134 • Each additional stair er flight $211.71 $66.30 -Storage Racks 135 • 6-10' high (up to 100 If first 100 If $1,269.22 $817.69 136 • each additional 100 If each 100 If $1,269.22 $662.99 137 • over 10' high (up to 100 If first 100 If $1,269.22 $817.69 138 • each additional 100 If each 100 If $1,269.22 $331.50 -Swimming Pool/Spa Residential 139 • Vin I-lined u to 1000 s.f. each $241.48 $265.20 140 • Fiberglass each $241.48 $265.20 • Gunite (up to 1000 s.f.)- Custom and to 141 establish master each $467.57 $676.64 142 • Pool over 1000 s.f. each 100 s.f. $467.57 $676.64 143 • Commercial pool (up to 1000 sf each $643.70 $676.64 144 •Commercial pool over 1000 sf $643.70 $676.64 P198 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 17 MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Current Work Item Unit Fee New Fee Temporary Utility Connection or 145 Occupancy $60.64 $66.31 Window or Sliding Glass Door(new) 146 non-structural $151.06 $116.26 147 - Replacement each $151.06 $116.26 New window(structural shear 148 wall/masonry) each $151.06 $116.26 149 Bay Window structural each $211.72 $232.04 ALTERNATE METHODS AND 150 MATERIALS $101.44 $0.00 - Category 1 (repeats and minimal 151 complexity) each $167.69 $55.25 152 - Category 2 moderate complexity) each $223.93 $55.25 153 - Category 3 (complex issues each $280.16 $55.25 154 - Category 4(highly complex each $336.40 $55.25 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES: -Additional plan check fee after(2) 155 rechecks hourly rates $182.00 $132.60 156 - Fire Protection Engineer(hourly) hourly $182.00 $132.60 157 - Research first 1/2 hour up to 1/2 hour $182.00 $66.30 - Each additional 1/2 hour(or portion 158 thereof) each 1/2 hour $182.00 $66.30 Note: The above fees cover typical projects. Fees for certain unique or similar projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building and Safety Director. It will be based on the overhead hourly rate and the time of service provided. PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf" A-1 Assembly-Fixed Seating 2,000 $3,755.00 $4,135.07 $21.62 Theater, Concert Hall 10,000 $4,683.00 $5,864.54 $13.25 - 20,000 $5,784.00 $7,189.60 $9.49 - 40,000 $7,357.00 $9,087.32 $3.39 - 100,000 $10,250.00 $11,118.80 $2.40 - 200,000 $16,035.00 $13,522.30 $6.76 A-2 Assembly-Food & Drink 500 $2,555.00 $2,710.73 $56.64 - Restaurant, Night Club, Bar 2,500 1 $5,475.00 $3,843.51 $34.40 5,000 $6,079.00 $4,703.55 $24.87 P199 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 18 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf* - 10,000 $7,638.00 $5,947.10 $8.86 - 25,000 $9,430.00 $7,276.34 $6.30 - 50,000 $12,592.00 $8,851.15 $17.70 A-3 Assembl -Chruch 1,000 $3,963.00 $3,418.20 $35.74 - 5,000 $4,741.00 $4,847.76 $21.86 - 10,000 $5,653.00 $5,940.83 $15.69 - 20,000 $7,131.00 $7,509.37 $5.60 - 50,000 $8,822.00 $9,190.78 $3.98 - 100,000 $12,487.00 $11,181.50 $11.18 A-3 Assembly-Auditorium 1,000 $3,197.00 $3,418.20 $35.74 - 5,000 $3,755.00 $4,847.76 $21.86 - 10,000 $4,693.00 $5,940.83 $12.49 - 20,000 $5,784.00 $7,189.60 $6.67 - 50,000 $7,357.00 $9,190.78 $3.98 - 100,000 $10,250.00 $11,181.50 $11.18 A-3 Assembly-Small Assembly Bld s 100 n/a n/a N/A - 500 n/a n/a N/A - 1,000 $3,197.00 $3,233.23 $85.69 - 2,000 $3,476.00 $4,090.13 $25.25 - 5,000 $3,755.00 $4,847.76 $24.79 - 10,000 $4,693.00 $6,087.13 $60.87 A-3 Bowling Alley 1,000 $4,353.00 $3,454.77 $36.13 - 5,000 $5,172.00 $4,900.01 $22.13 - 10,000 $6,529.00 $6,006.66 $15.86 - 20,000 $8,050.00 $7,592.97 $5.66 - 50,000 $10,707.00 $9,290.05 $4.03 - 100,000 $15,551.00 $11,306.90 $11.31 A-3 Library Museum 1,000 $4,542.00 $3,415.06 $35.74 - 5,000 $5,376.00 $4,844.62 $21.92 - 10,000 $5,747.00 $5,940.83 $15.66 - 20,000 $8,334.00 $7,507.28 $5.59 - 50,000 $10,988.00 $9,185.55 $3.99 - 100,000 $15,818.00 $11,181.50 $11.18 B Business-Bank 1,000 $3,685.00 $3,193.52 $33.36 - 5,000 $4,421.00 $4,527.99 $20.29 - 10,000 $5,572.00 $5,542.68 $4.22 - 20,000 $6,851.00 $5,964.86 $8.70 - 50,000 $9,208.00 $8,574.23 $3.71 - 100,000 $13,490.00 $10,429.10 $10.43 B Business-Laundromat 100 n/a n/a N/A - 500 $3,931.00 $2,701.33 $119.55 P200 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 19 PLAN CHECK &INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf* - 1,000 $4,921.00 $3,299.07 $87.57 - 2,000 $6,049.00 $4,174.78 $22.43 - 5,000 $7,890.00 $4,847.76 $27.32 - 10,000 $11,257.00 $6,213.57 $62.14 B Business-Medical Office 1,000 $3,943.00 $3,311.61 $34.59 - 5,000 $4,728.00 $4,695.19 $20.92 - 10,000 $5,994.00 $5,741.23 $15.22 20,000 $7,375.00 $7,262.75 $5.40 50,000 $10,007.00 $8,882.50 $3.85 100,000 $14,807.00 $10,805.30 $10.81 B Business-Professional Office 1,000 $6,387.00 $3,299.07 $34.54 - 5,000 $8,772.00 $4,680.56 $21.21 - 10,000 $10,011.00 $5,741.23 $15.13 - 20,000 $11,519.00 $7,254.39 $5.41 - 50,000 $13,857.00 $8,877.28 $3.86 100,000 $17,116.00 $10,805.30 $10.81 B Business-High Rise Office 1,000 $3,504.00 $3,488.21 $36.52 - 5,000 $3,930.00 $4,949.12 $22.49 - 10,000 $4,686.00 $6,073.54 $15.99 - 20,000 $5,826.00 $7,672.39 $5.72 - 50,000 $6,189.00 $9,389.33 $4.07 - 100,000 $6,977.00 $11,421.85 $11.42 B Occupancy Tenant B Improvements 500 $1,120.00 $1,096.21 $22.15. - 2,500 $1,434.00 $1,539.29 $21.57 - 5,000 $1,742.00 $2,078.51 $8.99 - 10,000 $2,092.00 $2,527.86 $4.56 - 25,000 $2,794.00 $3,211.29 $4.47 - 50,000 $4,040.00 $4,329.44 $8.66 E Educational-Group Occupancy 500 $2,758.00 $2,637.58 $55.07 - 6+ persons, up to the 12th Grade 2,500 $3,120.00 $3,739.01 $33.27 - 5,000 $3,639.00 $4,570.83 $21.23 - 10,000 $4,549.00 $5,632.55 $9.60 - 25,000 $4,946.00 $7,072.56 $6.13 50,000 $5,720.00 $8,605.58 $17.21 E Educational-Da Care 100 n/a n/a N/A - 5+ children, older than 2 1/2 yrs 500 $3,311.00 $2,613.55 $117.25 1,000 $4,016.00 $3,199.79 $35.53 2,000 $4,979.00 $3,555.09 $46.50 - 5,000 $6,080.00 $4,950.17 $21.46 10,000 $8,107.00 $6,023.38 $60.23 P201 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 20 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf Factory Industrial-Moderate F-1 Hazard 1,000 $4,118.00 $3,268.76 $34.18 - 5,000 $4,858.00 $4,636.14 $20.79 - 10,000 $6,010.00 $5,675.40 $15.02 - 20,000 $7,452.00 $7,177.06 $5.34 - 50,000 $9,716.00 $8,778.00 $3.80 - 100,000 $13,835.00 $10,679.90 $10.68 F-1 Factor Industrial-Woodworkin 500 $2,910.00 $2,547.66 $53.35 2,500 $3,399.00 $3,614.66 $32.92 - 5,000 $4,178.00 $4,437.59 $23.38 - 10,000 $5,174.00 $5,606.43 $8.38 - 25,000 $6,456.00 $6,863.56 $5.11 - 50,000 $8,817.00 $8,140.55 $16.28 Factory Industrial- F-1 Industrial/Manufacturing 4,000 $5,793.00 $4,386.91 $11.50 - 20,000 $8,960.00 $6,226.11 $7.14 40,000 $11,044.00 $7,653.58 $5.03 80,000 $17,036.00 $9,664.16 $1.80 - 200,000 $23,697.00 $11,829.40 $1.27 - 400,000 $40,008.00 $14,379.20 $3.59 F-2 Factory Industrial-Low Hazard 4,000 $5,794.00 $4,386.91 $11.50 - 20,000 $8,961.00 $6,226.11 $7.14 - 40,000 $11,044.00 $7,653.58 $5.03 - 80,000 $17,036.00 $9,664.16 $1.80 - 200,000 $23,697.00 $11,829.40 $1.27 - 400,000 $40,008.00 $14,379.20 $3.59 H-2 High Hazard Group H-2 200 n/a n/a n/a - Moderate Explosion Hazards 1,000 $5,073.00 $3,346.09 $74.93 - 2,000 $6,264.00 $4,095.36 $54.18 - 4,000 $7,736.00 $5,179.02 $19.26 - 10,000 $9,373.00 $6,334.79 $13.73 - 20,000 $12,439.00 $7,707.92 $38.54 High Hazard Group H-4 - Repair H-4 Garage 1,000 $3,559.00 $3,444.32 $35.97 - Pose health hazards 5,000 $5,300.00 $4,883.29 $21.80 - 10,000 $6,700.00 $5,973.22 $15.82 - 20,000 $8,256.00 $7,555.35 $5.63 - 50,000 $11,048.00 $9,243.03 $4.00 - 100,000 $16,146.00 $11,244.20 $11.24 Institutional-6+ persons, non- 1-2 ambulatory 1,000 $3,733.00 $3,500.02 $36.59 - Assisted Living/Nursing Living/Nursing Home 5,000 $4,368.00 $4,963.75 $22.20 P202 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 21 PLAN CHECK &INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf* - 10,000 $5,411.00 $6,073.54 $16.07 - 20,000 $6,701.00 $7,680.75 $5.71 - 50,000 $8,519.00 $9,394.55 $4.08 - 100,000 $11,859.00 $11,432.30 $11.43 Mercantile-Retail or wholesale M store 1,000 $3,362.00 $3,406.70 $26.87 - 5,000 $3,954.00 $4,481.48 $20.56 - 10,000 $4,892.00 $5,509.24 $13.83 - 20,000 $6,040.00 $6,891.78 $5.65 - 50,000 $7,687.00 $8,585.72 $4.69 - 100,000 $10,303.00 $10,930.70 $10.93 Mercantile-Retail Tenant M Improvements 200 $1,120.00 $1,315.13 $58.72 1,000 $1,434.00 $1,784.86 $39.29 2,000 $1,741.00 $2,177.78 $25.94 - 4,000 $2,092.00 $2,696.62 $12.07 - 10,000 $2,792.00 $3,420.81 $13.55 20,000 $4,040.00 $4,775.65 $23.88 R-1 Residential-Transient 1,000 $5,327.00 $3,435.96 $35.84 - Boarding Houses, Hotels, Motels 5,000 $6,233.00 $4,869.70 $21.42 - 10,000 $7,702.00 $5,940.83 $15.79 - 20,000 $9,565.00 $7,519.82 $5.59 - 50,000 $12,289.00 $9,196.00 $3.99 - 100,000 $17,260.00 $11,191.95 $11.19 Residential-Permanent, 2+ R-2 Dwellings 1,000 $5,969.00 $3,435.96 $35.84 - Apartment, Dormitory, Timeshare 5,000 $7,705.00 $4,869.70 $21.42 - 10,000 $8,938.00 $5,940.83 $15.79 - 20,000 $10,609.00 $7,519.82 $5.59 50,000 $12,762.00 $9,196.00 $3.99 100,000 $16,544.00 $11,191.95 $11.19 R-3 Dwellings-Custom Homes 1,000 $1,733.00 $1,712.76 $28.74 models 2,000 $2,198.00 $2,000.13 $24.35 3,000 $2,343.00 $2,243.62 $38.98 4,000 $2,870.00 $2,633.40 $33.96 5,000 $3,052.00 $2,973.03 $15.68 10,000 $4,175.00 $3,756.78 $33.01 R-3 Dwellings-Production Phase 1,000 $1,075.00 $785.84 $9.09 of Master Plan (repeats) 2,000 $1,295.00 $876.76 $14.00 3,000 $1,355.00 $1,016.79 $16.72 4,000-1 $1,464.00 $1,183.99 $13.90 5,000 $1,563.00 $1,322.97 $6.73 P203 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 22 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf 10,000 $1,978.00 $1,659.46 $15.11 Residential-Assisted Living (6-16 R-4 persons) 1,500 $3,296.00 $3,307.43 $22.97 - Non-Ambulatory 7,500 $5,001.00 $4,685.78 $13.64 - 15,000 $6,746.00 $5,708.84 $10.14 - 30,000 $9,554.00 $7,229.31 $3.58 - 75,000 $17,980.00 $8,840.70 -$11.79 - 150,000 n/a $0.00 n/a Residential-Assisted Living (6-16 R-4 persons) 1,000 $3,634.00 $2,960.49 $30.91 - Ambulatory 5,000 $5,491.00 $4,196.72 $18.52 - 10,000 $6,735.00 $5,122.59 $13.61 - 20,000 $9,035.00 $6,483.18 $4.81 - 50,000 $13,640.00 $7,926.33 $3.44 - 100,000 $0.00 $9,645.35 $9.65 S-1 Storage-Moderate Hazard 1,000 $3,105.00 $3,233.23 $36.03 - 5,000 $4,571.00 $4,674.29 $18.68 - 10,000 $5,641.00 $5,608.52 $15.46 - 20,000 $6,997.00 $7,154.07 $7.13 - 50,000 $9,088.00 $9,292.14 $7.79 - 100,000 $12,895.00 $13,185.81 $13.19 S-1 Storage-Mini Storage 500 $1,424.00 $1,195.48 $110.30 - 2,500 $3,317.00 $3,401.48 $30.39 - 5,000 $4,052.00 $4,161.19 $22.05 - 10,000 $5,066.00 $5,263.67 $7.82 - 25,000 $6,282.00 $6,437.20 $5.58 - 50,000 $7,771.00 $7,832.28 $15.66 Storage-Moderate Hazard, Repair S-1 Garage 200 n/a $0.00 n/a not High Hazard 1,000 $3,105.00 $3,081.71 $68.24 2,000 $3,880.00 $3,764.09 $49.95 4,000 $4,571.00 $4,763.11 $17.68 10,000 $5,641.00 $5,823.79 $12.63 20,000 $6,997.00 $7,087.19 $35.44 Storage -Motor Vehicle Fuel S-1 Dispensing 100 n/a $0.00 n/a 500 $3,167.00 $2,672.07 $121.01 1,000 $3,689.00 $3,277.12 $86.53 2,000 $4,538.00 $4,142.38 $30.88 5,000 $5,599.00 $5,068.77 $21.96 - 10,000 $6,807.00 $6,166.55 $61.67 S-2 Storage -Warehouse 10,000 $4,626.00 $4,898.96 $5.14 P204 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 23 PLAN CHECK &INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf* - 50,000 $5,874.00 $6,954.48 $3.19 - 100,000 $8,696.19 $8,548.10 $2.24 - 200,000 $10,168.00 $10,784.40 $0.81 - 500,000 $15,374.00 $13,219.25 $2.38 Storage-Low Hazard, Parking S-2 Garages 500 $1,783.00 $1,316.70 $48.44 - Open or Enclosed 2,500 $3,817.00 $2,285.42 $71.52 - 5,000 $4,234.00 $4,073.41 $21.57 - 10,000 $5,289.00 $5,151.85 $7.66 - 25,000 $7,058.00 $6,301.35 $5.48 - 50,000 $8,735.00 $7,670.30 $15.34 U Accessory-Agricultural Building 500 $1,660.00 $1,316.22 $86.43 - 2,500 $3,545.00 $3,044.89 $27.89 - 5,000 $3,931.00 $3,742.15 $19.65 10,000 $4,935.00 $4,724.45 $7.06 - 25,000 $6,393.00 $5,784.08 $5.02 - 50,000 $7,963.00 $7,038.08 $14.08 - Fire Stations 1,000 $3,670.00 $3,697.21 $38.69 - 5,000 $5,594.00 $5,244.86 $23.64 - 10,000 $7,151.00 $6,426.75 $16.97 20,000 $8,809.00 $8,123.83 $6.06 50,000 $13,443.00 $9,943.18 $4.29 - 100,000 $18,974.00 $12,090.65 $12.09 - Public Building -Office 1,000 $4,397.00 $3,700.35 $38.69 - 5,000 $5,228.00 $5,247.99 $23.58 - 10,000 $6,575.00 $6,426.75 $16.99 20,000 $8,121.00 $8,125.92 $6.06 - 50,000 $10,884.00 $9,943.18 $4.29 - 100,000 $15,904.00 $12,090.65 $12.09 - Public Building - Police 1,000 $4,462.00 $3,700.35 $38.69 - 5,000 $5,299.00 $5,247.99 $23.58 - 10,000 $6,651.00 $6,426.75 $16.99 - 20,000 $8,220.00 $8,125.92 $6.06 - 50,000 $10,983.00 $9,943.18 $4.29 - 100,000 $15,992.00 $12,090.65 $12.09 - Public Building - Recreation 1,000 $3,569.00 $3,700.35 $38.69 - 5,000 $4,240.00 $5,247.99 $23.58 - 10,000 $5,321.00 $6,426.75 $16.99 20,000 $6,575.00 $8,125.92 $6.06 50,000 $8,784.00 $9,943.18 $4.29 100,000 $12,796.00 $12,090.65 $12.09 P205 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 24 PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf* - Public Building - Miscellaneous 1,000 $3,569.00 $3,700.35 $38.69 - 5,000 $4,240.00 $5,247.99 $23.58 - 10,000 $5,321.00 $6,426.75 $16.99 - 20,000 $6,575.00 $8,125.92 $6.06 - 50,000 $8,784.00 $9,943.18 $4.29 - 100,000 $12,796.00 $12,090.65 $12.09 SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell Buildings 1,000 $3,701.00 $2,816.27 $31.74 - 5,000 $4,389.00 $4,085.95 $18.45 - 10,000 $5,533.00 $5,008.68 $13.61 - 20,000 $6,823.00 $6,369.27 $4.59 - 50,000 $9,037.00 $7,745.54 $3.36 - 100,000 $13,083.00 $9,423.81 $9.42 A-2 Shell: Assembly-Food & Drink 500 $4,040.00 $2,447.35 $51.15 - 2,500 $4,351.00 $3,470.44 $31.27 - 5,000 $4,869.00 $4,252.10 $22.47 - 10,000 $6,215.00 $5,375.48 $8.02 - 25,000 $8,167.00 $6,578.27 $5.85 - 50,000 $10,707.00 $8,041.27 $16.08 B Shell: Business-Medical Offices 1,000 $3,355.00 $2,816.27 $29.47 - 5,000 $3,998.00 $3,995.03 $17.89 - 10,000 $4,988.00 $4,889.55 $16.47 - 20,000 $7,375.00 $6,536.47 $3.42 50,000 $8,382.00 $7,561.62 $3.27 100,000 $12,355.00 $9,198.09 $9.20 Shell: Business-Professional B Office 1,000 $3,642.00 $2,849.71 $29.86 5,000 $4,319.00 $4,044.15 $18.31 - 10,000 $5,411.00 $4,959.52 $12.97 - 20,000 $6,692.00 $6,256.41 $4.66 - 50,000 $8,899.00 $7,655.67 $3.31 - 100,000 $12,917.00 $9,310.95 $9.31 - Lab/R&D 1,000 $3,161.00 $3,361.24 $26.16 - 5,000 $3,796.00 $4,407.81 $21.37 10,000 $4,807.00 $5,476.32 $13.70 20,000 $5,925.00 $6,846.32 $6.63 - 50,000 $8,129.00 $8,834.95 $4.65 100,000 $12,123.00 $11,160.60 $11.16 *Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold. P206 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 25 PLAN CHECK& INSPECTION FEES Each Project Size Additional IBC Class IBC/CBC Occupancy Type Threshold Current Fees New Fee 100 sf Note: The above fees cover typical projects. Fees for certain unique or similar projects will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the Building and Safety Director. It will be based on the overhead hourly rate and the time of service provided. SECTION 5: The City Council hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Planning Department, including a technology fee of 4.5%. Current New Fee Name Fee Fee 1 Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit $2,354.00 $2,459.93 2 Annexation $9,864.00 $12,017.50 3 -Appeal of a PC decision $2,379.00 $2,486.06 4 -Appeal of Planning Director decision $2,095.00 $1,306.25 5 Certificate of Appropriateness $2,087.00 $2,180.92 6 Conditional Use Permit $2,692.00 $2,978.25 7 Conditional Use Permit- Modification Fee $1,346.00 $1,489.13 8 Design Review-Commercial/Industrial $11,629.00 $9,823.00 9 Design Review-Commercial/Industrial - Modification $5,814.00 $4,911.50 10 -Design Review- Res. 4 du or less $6,775.00 $7,079.88 11 -Design Review- Res. 4 du or less - Modification $3,387.00 $3,539.42 12 -Design Review- Residential $12,076.00 $10,450.00 13 -Design Review- Residential - Modification $6,038.00 $5,225.00 14 Development A reement $11,887.00 $13,062.50 15 -Development Agreement- Modification $5,943.50 $6,531.25 16 Development Code Amendment $1,633.00 $6,270.00 17 Entertainment Permit $4,870.00 $5,089.15 18 Entertainment Permit- Modification $2,435.00 $2,544.58 19 Entertainment Permit-Annual Renewal $75.00 $156.75 20 Environmental Impact Report EIR - Preparation $30,167.00 $36,575.00 21 Environmental Impact Report EIR - Review Only $3,934.00 $5,747.50 22 Film Permit $162.00 $169.29 23 General Plan Amendment $12,227.00 $11,913.00 24 Hillside Development Review <4 dwelling units $6,120.00 $2,090.00 25 Hillside Development Review >5 dwelling units $6,715.00 $3,239.50 26 Home Occupation Permit $126.00 $52.25 27 Initial Study $1,796.00 $2,664.75 28 Land Use Verification Report $85.00 $125.40 29 Landmark Application $3,447.00 $3,602.12 30 -Large Day Care Permit $541.00 $565.35 31 Mills Act Application $1,347.00 $1,407.62 P207 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 26 Current New Fee Name Fee Fee 32 Minor Design Review $2,591.00 $2,090.00 33 Minor Design Review- Modification Fee $1,296.00 $1,045.00 34 Minor Exception $479.00 $500.56 35 Mitigation Plan -Simple $594.00 $715.83 36 Pre Application Review- Planning Commission $5,553.00 $2,090.00 37 Preliminary Review $4,979.00 $2,090.00 38 Public Convenience or Necessity ABC License $947.00 $1,201.75 39 Sign Permit $88.00 $120.18 40 Similar Use Determination $1,838.00 $1,463.00 41 Site Development Review $100/hour $100/hour 42 Specific/Communit /Master Plan - New $10,702.00 $12,540.00 43 S ecific/Communit /Master Plan Amendment $3,369.00 $4,180.00 44 Street Name Change $5,597.00 $4,493.50 45 Temporary Use Permit $140.00 $177.65 46 Temporary Use Permit- Model Home $125.00 $177.65 47 Tentative Parcel Ma $7,370.00 $7,701.65 48 Tentative Parcel Ma - Review for Substantial Conformance $3,685.00 $3,850.83 49 Tentative Tract Ma $13,542.00 $14,151.39 50 Tentative Tract Ma - Review for Substantial Conformance $6,771.00 $7,075.70 51 Time Extension $540.00 $679.25 52 Trail Easement Vacation $5,413.00 $5,656.59 53 Tree Removal - Multi-family/Commercial/Industrial $503.00 $418.00 54 Tree Removal - New Development $739.00 $772.26 55 Tree Removal -Single Family Residential $503.00 $104.50 56 Uniform Sign Program $1,954.00 $2,041.93 57 Uniform Sign Program Modification $977.00 $1,020.97 58 Variance $2,216.00 $2,315.72 59 -Zoning Map Amendment $8,500.00 $8,882.50 SECTION 6: The City Council hereby amends Resolution 06-032 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Engineering Services Department, including a technology fee of 4.5%. Fee Type Current Fee New Fee APPLICATIONS 1 Amending Ma $1,880.00 $1,964.60 2 Bond Substitution $2,222.00 $2,321.99 3 Certificate of Compliance $2,420.00 $2,528.90 4 Certificate of Correction $1,460.00 $1,525.70 Lot Line Adjustment($1,380.00 for each 5 additional parcel) $1,940.00 $2,027.30 6 Private Street Designation $3,370.00 $3,521.65 P208 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 27 Fee Type Current Fee New Fee Reapportionment Maps (two sheet parcel/tract map; $30.00 each additional 7 sheet) $1,750.00 $1,828.75 8 Reimbursement Agreement-Storm Drain $5,140.00 $5,371.30 Reimbursement Agreement-Street and 9 Utilities $5,830.00 $6,092.35 10 Release of Lien Agreement $1,160.00 $1,212.20 11 Standard Agreement/Document Processing $1,100.00 $1,149.50 12 Street Vacation $3,950.00 $4,127.75 13 Traffic Study Review(Development Project $221.00 $230.95 MAP AND IMPROVEMENT PLAN CHECKING 14 Pro erty Legal Description $1,380.00 $1,442.10 15 Residential Parcel Ma +$240 per parcel) $4,350.00 $4,545.75 $5298.15 Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel $5,070(+$290.00 per (+$290.00 per 16 Maps over ten 10 lots parcel or lot) parcel or lot Tract Maps and Non-Residential Parcel 17 Maps of ten 10 lots or less $5,480.00 $5,726.60 $35.53 per map 18 Map Printing as adopted by Count $34.00 per map sheet sheet $0.69 per LF + $0.66 per LF + sheet sheet charge for 19 Widening of Existing Streets charge for interior streets interior streets 20 Interior Streets- 1 sheet $3,660.00 LS $3824.7 LS 21 Interior Streets-2 streets $4,430.00 LS $4629.35 LS 22 Interior Streets- 3 and 4 $1,260.00 each $1316.70 each 23 Interior Streets- 5 sheets $7,950.00 LS $8307.75 LS 24 Interior Streets-6 through 9 $1,260.00 each $1316.7 each 25 Interior Streets- 10 sheets $14,960.00 LS $15,633.20 LS 26 Interior Streets-Sheets 11 and more $1,260.00 each $1316.7 each Same as for Interior Same as for Interior 27 Storm Drain Plans Streets Streets 28 Landscaped and Irrigation Plans for 29 City-Maintained Areas $1,290.00 each 1348.05 each 30 Hydrology Study Drainage Areas up 31 to 150 acres $3,230.00 $3,375.35 32 Hydrology Study Drainage Areas 33 greater than 150 acres $4,410.00 $4,608.45 PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT CPI Inspection: Drainage Catch Basin W=4', Tor 34 21' 69.45 each 72.58 each I P209 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 28 Fee Type Current Fee New Fee 35 Inspection: Drainage Collar Pipe PCC $23.15 each 24.19 each 36 Inspection: Drainage Headwall 48"Win $46.29 each 48.37 each Inspection: Drainage Junction Structure w/o 37 Manhole $30.86 each 32.25 each Inspection: Drainage Junction Structure with 38 Manhole $30.86 each 32.25 each 39 Inspection: Draina a RCP 18"thru 54" $13088 LF $14.50 LF 40 Inspection: Drainage RCP 60"thru 96" $23.15 LF $24.19 LF 41 Inspection: V-Ditch $4.63 LF $4.84 LF Inspection: Landscape Cobblestone/Boulders 1st 2,000 SF + $92.61 42 each addl 1,000 SF $368.49 $385.07 43 Inspection: Landscape Concrete Header $1.54 LF $1.61 LF $96.77 per $92.60 per inspection inspection 44 Inspection: Landscape Decomposed Granite Occurrence Occurrence 45 Inspection: Landscape Fence Tubular Steel $6.16 LF $6.44 LF 46 Inspection: Landscape Gates Tubular Steel $15.42 each $16.11 each 47 Inspection: Landscape Irrigation System $2.30 LF $2.40 LF 48 Inspection: Landscape Maintenance 180 Da $739.17 each 772.43 each Inspection: Landscape Masonry Column / - 49 Pilaster $12.34 each $12.90 each 50 Inspection: Landscape Mulch Shredded 4" $3.24 CY $3.39 CY 51 Inspection: Landscape Pavers $3.07 SF $3.21 SF 52 Inspection: Landscape Shrub 1 and 5 gallon $1.54 each $1.61 each $0.80 SF(Jute 53 Inspection: Landscape Slope Erosion Control $0.77 SF Jute Matting) Matting) Inspection: Landscape Trail Fence PVC 2- 54 rail and 3-rail $6.16 LF $6.44 LF 55 Inspection: Landscape Trail Gate $92.60 each $96.77 each 56 Inspection: Landscape Tree 5 and 15 Gallon $13.88 each $14.50 each 57 Inspection: Landscape Tree 24" Box $18.51 each $19.34 each 58 Inspection: Landscape Tree Palm $30.86 each 32.25 each P210 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 29 Fee Type Current Fee New Fee 59 Inspection: Landscape Vine 5 Gallon $1.54 each $1.61 each 60 Inspection: Landscape Wall Garden 6' $12.34 LF $12.90 LF 61 Inspection: Landscape Wall Retaining 3' $12.34 LF $12.90 LF 62 Inspection: Landscape Wall Retaining Drain $7.71 LF $8.06 LF Inspection: Landscape Removal Clear and 63 Grub $69.45 each $72.58 each 64 Inspection: Removal of AC Berm $0.77 LF $0.80 LF 65 Inspection: Removal of PCC Curb $0.73 LF $0.76 LF 66 Inspection: Removal of PCC Sidewalk $0.37 SF $0.39 SF 67 Inspection: Removal Tree $33.89 each $35.42 each 68 Inspection: Street AC 1,000 LF Paved Lane $69.45 each $72.58 each 69 Inspection: Street Access Ram $30.86 each $32.25 each Inspection: Street Adjust Manhole and 70 Valves/CO to Grade $7.71 each $8.06 each Inspection: Street Aggregate Base (per 1,000 71 LF) $69.45 each $72.58 each 72 Inspection: Street Barricades $1.54 LF $1.61 LF 73 Inspection: Street Berm AC $1.54 LF $1.61 LF 74 Inspection: Street Cross-gutter $0.46 SF $0.48 SF 75 Inspection: Street Curb & Gutter 6" $0.27 LF $0.28 LF 76 Inspection: Street Curb & Gutter 8" $0.32 LF 0.33 LF 77 Inspection: Street Curb & Gutter 12" $0.37 LF 0.39 LF 78 Inspection: Street Curb &Gutter Cobble $2.30 LF $2.40 LF 79 Inspection: Street Curb Core $46.29 each $48.37 each 80 Inspection: Street Curb Only $0.38 LF $0.40 LF 81 Inspection: Street Curb Rolled $0.77 LF $0.80 LF Inspection: Street Curbside Drain STD 107- 82 A, B &C $138.18 each $144.4 each $72.58 per Inspection: Street Drive Approach $69.45 per inspection inspection 83 Commercial occurrence occurrence $35.52 per Inspection: Street Drive Approach $33.99 per inspection inspection 84 Residential occurrence occurrence Inspection: Street Light/Signal Interconnect 85 Conduit $0.55 LF $0.57 LF 86 Inspection: Street Lights $7.71 each $8.06 each Inspection: Street Right Turn Lane/Busbay 87 PCC 8" $461.70 each $482.48 each P211 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 30 Fee Type Current Fee New Fee 88 Inspection: Street Sidewalk PCC 4" $0.16 SF $0.17 SF Inspection: Street Subgrade Preparation/Fine 89 Grading $0.18 LF $0.19 LF 90 Inspection: Traffic Pavement Markings $0.77 each $0.80 each $192.53 per $184.24 per inspection inspection 91 Inspection: Traffic Pavement Striping occurrence occurrence $48.37 per $46.29 per inspection inspection 92 Inspection: Traffic Reflectors and Posts occurrence occurrence 93 Inspection: Traffic Signal $4,691.62 each $4902.74 each 94 Inspection: Traffic Signal Modification $2,314.00 each $2418.13 each 95 Inspection: Traffic Street Sin $7.71 each $8.06 each Inspection: Utility Fiber Optic Conduit& 96 Trench $2.30 LF $2.40 LF Inspection: Utility Underground Existing 97 Electrical $2.30 LF $2.40 LF Inspection: Utility Underground Existing 98 Telecom $2.30 LF $2.40 LF Inspection: Miscellaneous; Construction items not listed above will be charged based upon an estimated hourly inspection need at the rate of$92.60 per hour(OT -$138.90) Minimum Public Works Construction Permit Fee is $50.00 SECTION 7: The City Council hereby repeals Resolutions 04-293, 06-283 and 12-101 which previously set fees for the Building and Safety and Planning Departments effective 60 days from the effective date of this Resolution. SECTION 8: The fees set forth in section 3 of this Resolution shall take immediate effect. SECTION 9: Subject to the provisions of Section 10, in accordance with California Government Code Section 66017, those fees and charges set forth in Sections 4, 5 and 6, that constitute "a fee or charge...upon a development project...which applies to the filing, accepting, reviewing, approving, or issuing of an application, permit, or entitlement to use" shall become effective and payable sixty (60) days from the date of adoption of this Resolution. SECTION 10: Each fee set forth in Sections 4 and 5 shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2014, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 11: Section 7(a) of Resolution 06-032 is hereby amended to read as follows: P212 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.12-196 FEES FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND CITY CLERK December 19, 2012 Page 31 Application Fees, Public Works Construction Permit Fees and Map and Improvement Plan Checking Fees shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2014, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 12: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P213 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplemental update to the Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) to amend Article 11 (Land Use and Development Procedures), Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses and Development Standards), Article IV (Site Development Provisions) and Article V (Specific Use Requirements) of Title 17 (Development Code) as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and staff recommend the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report for Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056; and 2. Approve Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 for the supplemental updates to the Development Code. BACKGROUND: On July 18, 2012, the City Council, on the recommendation of the Planning Commission, adopted the City's first comprehensive Development Code Update. The updated Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. The Development Code was not intended to become a static document. Just as the community and the economy change and grow, the Development Code should also be reviewed and refined not just to keep up with change and growth, but to anticipate it. At the City Council hearing, staff proposed to present Code updates on a regular basis to deal with issues that were discovered after the Code became effective. The changes proposed at this time are mostly procedural in nature. They would: (1) reinstate development standards that were unintentionally omitted; (2) correct errors in translation of the allowed uses found within the land use tables; and (3) clarify existing regulations. At the direction of the Planning Commission, standards for wind turbines (small wind energy systems) have also been developed and included as part of this set of amendments. The Planning Commission directed staff to begin incorporating development standards for wind energy systems to implement Policy RC-4.2 of the General Plan to support efforts to develop small scale wind energy generation while maintaining a positive design aesthetic to the greatest extent possible. Staff reviewed ordinances from across the country and found three jurisdictions whose standards for wind P214 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2012-01056 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 19, 2012 Page 2 energy addressed a wide range of development concerns. They are: (1) Biddeford, ME; (2) El Dorado County, CA; and (3) San Diego County, CA. Based on standards incorporated by these jurisdictions, Staff developed the proposed standards to ensure appropriate permitting and operation of small wind energy systems through the regulation of location, height, number of systems, color, supports, lighting, signs and noise. These standards were developed for small systems on residential or industrial properties designed to provide on site electrical generation and use. Commercial wind systems (i.e. wind farms) are not addressed in this amendment and are not permitted at this time. Staff will use the proposed changes to evaluate the future feasibility of expanding the development of wind energy systems to larger applications, including allowing them in more zoning districts or allowing larger scale wind energy systems. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES: Staff recommends the changes to the Development Code summarized below. Attachment 1 of the Ordinance prepared for the Council's consideration includes the actual text changes to the Development Code. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures 1. Minor Design Reviews. Amend Section 17.16.025 B to eliminate Minor Design Review applications from public noticing requirements. These applications have never been subject to public notice requirements and were erroneously written to require public notice. .2. Notice of Application. Amend Section 17.16.025 C to reflect that the notice of application process is done before a decision is..made. 3. Tree Removal Permits. Amend Section 17.16.080 G to clarify that tree removal permits for historic landmark trees can be appealed to the City Council and do not require final action of the City Council. 4. Certificate of Appropriateness. Amend Section 17.18.040 D 3 to require public noticing of an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness that will be decided by the Planning Director without requiring a public hearing. The public will still receive a mailed notice and be provided time to comment on the project prior to Planning Director approval. 5. Historic Preservation Incentives. Delete Section 17.18.100 H (Alternative Use Permit Procedures). Due to changes in the Conditional Use Permit approval process, these procedures are no longer"alternative", but rather the standard process. Article III Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards 6. Allowed Use Modifications. Amend allowed use regulations in Table 17.30.030-1 primarily due to translation errors as follows: • Vehicle Services, Major allowed as a permitted use in the GI, MI/HI and HI Districts. • Wholesale, Storage and Distribution—Heavy allowed as a conditionally permitted use in the GI Districts. P215 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2012-01056 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 19, 2012 Page 3 • Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities—Small allowed as a permitted use in the CC District. • Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities—Large allowed as a conditionally permitted use in the CC District. • Animal Sales and Grooming allowed as a permitted use in the CC District. • Small Wind Energy System allowed as a permitted use in the VL District and as a conditionally permitted use in the MI/HI and HI Districts. 7. Allowed Use Descriptions. Amend Section 17.32.020 as follows: • Delete the definition for Certified Farmer's Market and relocate it to Chapter 17.126.020 (Universal Definitions). Certified Farmer's Markets are a temporary use, not a permanent use and should not be defined in this section. • Add a definition for Wind Energy System — Small. 8. Rail Service Standards. Amend Section 17.36.040 to reincorporate rail service standards for industrial parcels. 9. Foothill Boulevard Overlay. Amend Figure 17.38.060-11 showing the correct zoning designation for the parcel on the north side of Foothill between Center and Hermosa. Article IV Site Development Provisions 10. Fences, Walls and Screening. Amend Table 17.48.050-1 as follows: • To reincorporate fencing standards for outdoor recreation courts. • Amend table name and header of table to include screening to provide height requirements for hedges in the front yard area. 11. Trailer Parking Dimensions. Amend Section 17.64.090 C 4 to state trailer parking spaces should be 14 feet wide, not 9 feet wide. 12. Flag Signs. Amend Table 17.74.090-1 to increase the maximum square footage from 15 square feet to 30 square feet. 13. Small Wind Energy System. Amend Chapter 17.76 as follows: • Rename the chapter to include wind as well as solar facilities. • Include special development criteria for small wind energy systems relative to: i. Overall height; ii. Lights on the tower; iii. Supports (i.e. guy wires); iv. Noise; v. Manual and automatic speed controls; P216 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2012-01056 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 19, 2012 Page 4 vi. Setbacks; vii. Utility infrastructure; and viii. Safety hazards. Article V Specific Use Requirements 14. Special Use Regulations. Amend Chapter 17.102 to relocate select use requirements for massage establishments currently located in Chapter 9.24. Article VIII Glossary 15. Universal Definitions. Amend Chapter 17.126 to include a definition for Certified Farmers Market relocated from 17.32.020. 16. Sign Definitions. Amend definition of"flag sign" in Chapter 17.136 for clarity. In addition, any spelling, grammatical and formatting errors that have been discovered since the publishing of the Development Code will be corrected. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027) has been prepared. This Development Code Amendment does not propose any substantial changes in the City's . development regulations that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review. The addendum is provided and shown as Attachment 2 of the Ordinance prepared for the Council's consideration. NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised 13 days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. No individual notice to property owners was provided. Respectfully submitted, *Jeffyyom Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:JN/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Draft Planning Commission Minutes dated November 28, 2012 P217 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE DRC2012-01056 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 19, 2012 Page 5 Exhibit B - Signed Planning Commission Resolution #12-47 Recommending Approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 Draft Ordinance of Approval for Municipal Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 0i) r /I lop + P218 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO NOVEMBER 28, 2012 CUCAMONGA Page 2 A. VACATION V-220– LVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA, LLC –A reguest'to"-V15c" ate the blanket drainage easement over Lots 56, 57, 58 and 59 of Tract Map,46776, generally located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester lace– N 227-693-56, 57, 58 and 59 Related File: DRC2012-00740. Motion: Moved by, seconded by, to adopVthe Consent Calendar as presented Motion carried by the OV following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWD%YSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE �� ABSENT NONE,-f ABSTAIN:, -e;�'7VONE carried 5-0 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION B. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056 AND ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplemental update to the Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) to amend Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures), Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses and Development Standards), Article IV (Site Development Provisions) and Article V (Specific Use Requirements) of Title 17 (Development Code) as well as a proposed addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR). This action will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner presented the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). In response to Vice Chairman Fletcher, Ms. Nakamura said some of the residential systems are now under $700 and within reach of more people. She said the technology is ever changing and staff is trying to stay ahead of those trends. She said it would not make sense to ask for screening of the units but the aesthetic compromise is to limit the height similar to chimneys. In response to Chairman Howdyshell, the roofline is the same for single and two-story homes at 35 feet; by Code they cannot go over 15 feet above the roofline. She added some requests have come in but like satellite dishes, the size may decrease over time. She said the General Plan supports the development of alternative energy sources. Commissioner Oaxaca, asked with respect to the requirement for these systems to be connected to the electrical provider, if a property owner could use the system to simply recharge a battery or store the power. Ms Nakamura said staff has not encountered this type of use, but will look into this. She said the use is limited to start with allowing these in the Very Low Residential and Medium High and High Residential Districts. In response to Chairman Howdyshell's comment about the Route 66 Community Garden, Ms. Nakamura noted Community Gardens are permitted by right in that location and staff will keep the Commission apprised on how that develops. She said staff is looking at infrastructure needs for these gardens, such as water, right now. EXHIBIT A P219 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO NOVEMBER 28, 2012 C,,UCAMONGA Page 3 Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment, she closed the public hearing. She said it was a great report. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly, to recommend approval of the Development Code Amendment and adoption of the addendum to the General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE carried 5-0 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/ DESIGN REVIEW - DR 12- 00726 - HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC -Site plan and architectural r w of a 306 unit rental condominium development on 19.25 acres located on the south of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Medium H' Development District(14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) of the Terra Vista Community P -APN: 0227-151- 49 and 50. Related Cases: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT188561 G ral Plan Amendment DRC2012-00727 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00759. Staf s prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for c eration. CONTINUANCE REQUEST TO THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 12, 201 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TEN , IVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18856 - HOMECOMING VAT TERRA VISTA, LLC-A re est to subdivide the 19.25 acre project site for condominium purposes for the Cleve ment of a 306 unit rental condominium development located on the south side of urch Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Medium High Develo ent District (14-24 Dwelling Units Per Acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan APN: 0227-151-49 and 50. Related Cases: Development/Design Review D 012-00726, General Plan Amendment DRC2012-00727 and Minor Exception DRC20 -00759. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental imp s for consideration. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the envir mental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUEST TO THE MEETING OF CEMBER 12, 2012. E. ENVIRONME L ASSESSENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2012-00727 - HOMECOM G V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC - A request to change the land use designation from Mix , se to Medium High Residential for 19.25 acres located on the side of Church Street ween Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive within the Terra Vista Community Plan - AP 227-151-49 and 50. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the e ironmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUEST TO THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 12, 2012. P220 RESOLUTION NO. 12-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Development Code Amendment No. DRC2012-01056 for a supplemental update to the City's Development Code found in Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. 2. On November 28, 2012, the Planning Commis_sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on November 28, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City Council adopted a comprehensive update to the City's Development Code that implements the policies of the General Plan, in July 2012. The new Development Code became effective on September 4, 2012. b. Based on feedback received since the effective date of the Development Code,the City prepared a set of amendments (the"Amendments"), which is included as Attachment 1 to this Resolution and is hereby incorporated by this reference as if set forth in full. C. Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 conforms to and does not conflict with the General Plan, including without limitation, the Land Use Element thereof, and will provide for development in a manner consistent with the General Plan. d. The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment 2 to this Resolution, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The Planning Commission finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively "CEQA"). EXHIBIT E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 12-47 P221 DRC2012-01056 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Development Code Amendment November 28, 2012 Page 2 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in_paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2012. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: rances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: an a Burnett, Senior Planner I, Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner of the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga., at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of November 2012, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA,WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 2 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P222 Staff is recommending the following amendments to the Development Code. These amendments are shown in track changes as excerpts from relevant sections of the Development Code with new language shown with underlined text and existing language to be removed shown with strike out text. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures Chapter 17.16 Planning Director Decisions Section 17.16.025 Director Determination Process (with Notice) B. Applicability. Notice for Director Determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree Removal Permit (only if six [6] or more) 2. Minor Exceptions 3. Conditional Use Permits 4 Minor DeSigR Reyie C. Notice of Application. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in Subsection B above shall be mailed to persons owning property within six hundred sixty feet (660') of the project site; in the case of tree removal permits or minor exceptions, notice is only required to adjacent properties. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the City ,moss a written request for appealfollowing an open public comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten (10) days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights.- 1. the de G*smen. 2. 3. . 4. An explaRatieR of appeal Fights and appeal deadiiRes. Section 17.16.080 Tree Removal Permit G. Historic Landmark Designation. Where the trees in question are designated as a Historic Landmark, a request for a Tree Removal Permit shall be subject to review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission and Certificate of Appropriateness procedure pursuant to Chapter 17.18 (Historic Preservation ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P223 Commission Decisions). The action of the Historic Preservation Commission shall be feFwaFded can be appealed to the City Council. Chapter 17.18 Historic Preservation Commission Decisions Section 17.18.040 Certificate of Appropriateness D. Procedures. I Planning Director Review. Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, the Planning Director shall review, and after providing notice to the surrounding property owners, shall deny, approve, or conditionally approve any application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for any of the following types of alterations: i. Repair or replacement of deteriorated materials with applications or materials of the same kind, type, and texture already in use for roofs, windows, siding material, chimneys and fireplaces, accessory structures, or fencing. ii. Addition or deletion of awnings, shutters, canopies, and similar incidental appurtenances. Section 17.18.100 Preservation Incentives H. beaF6 Rg houses, bed and breakfasts, iiRR6, small Off'Ges, boutiques, aRtique shGps, Use PeFM't URdeF this paragraph shall Reither waive aRY Fequ*remeRt of this Chapter Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P224 Article III Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, And Development Standards Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Uin x :x v t� c�.: ;O 7. se/Zon a =; fa .::'District Residential'Usei Adult Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Caretaker Housing C C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C P C P P Dwelling, Multi- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Dwelling, Second Unit(" P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling, Single- P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family Dwelling, Two- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N N N N N N Shelter Family Day Care C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Home, Large. Family Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N C N N Residential Home Occupation P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Manufactured Home (3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Par C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Residential Care N N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Residential Care Home P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P225 d'. zn al 4L Z se'&oning- . . � . .; .1 . 1 . ��J' -1 1 .0� & U 0: a) 't), Co. District Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Transitional P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Housing :1 AoAgriculture and,,An' imaI,r':ReIated"U se Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keepin'(A) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets Animal Keeping, 1 (4) C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Exotic Anima s Animal Keeping, Insects (4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animal Keeping, Livestock P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animals(4) Animal Keeping, Poultry (4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N. C C Commercial I I Equestrian P N N N N N N N N N N N � N N N N N N N N N N Facility, Hobby C 0, "S Education, sk cir"eaiiio�. e-'O Preservation ,p4ce , nd Public Assembly Uses S 11 A Assembly Use C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Cemetery/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N Mausoleum Community C C C C C C C C C C C C C N P P N N N C N N Center/Civic Use Community C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Garden Convention N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N Center Golf Course/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C- N C C Clubhouse Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N C N C C P P P N N N N N N N N N Entertainment Facility Indoor Fitness N and Sports LNN N N N N I C C .1 C C C C N C C C N N N N N N Facility-r Large Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P226 Land` Use/Zoning > x g I v v O District Indoor Fitness and Sports N N N N N N P. P P P P C N P C C N N N N N N Facility— Small — Library and C C C C C C P P P P N P N P C N N N C6 C C6 C6 Museum Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N C C C C N N C C C C N N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Plaza Public Safety C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N Facility Resource- Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N P N N (Public) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Public) Schools, Specialized N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Education and Training/Studio . Theaters and N N N N N N C N N C N N P N N N N N N N N N Auditoriums Tutoring Center— N N N N N N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N Large Tutoring Center— N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N Small Utility,Transportation, Public Fac�hty, ,and;Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N N Studios Park and Ride Facility N N N N N N N C C C N N N N P P N N N N N N Parking Facility N N N N N I N I P P N P I C N C P C C C C N N C C Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P227 O.."Wan 0 lus6lZoning +7 Ul 'D, i's't t .41 ric -, Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based Structures(5) Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines(5) Wind Energy Svstem — P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Q Q N N N N Small (10) Re'tafllj'SOiVice. and Offide Uses' Adult Day Care N N N N N N C C C C N N N C C C N N N N N N Facility Adult-Oriented Business(6) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A A N N N N Alcoholic N N N N N N .C N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Beverage Sales Ambulance N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N C P P N N N N Service Animal Sales and N Grooming N N N N N N P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N Art, Antique, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Collectable Shop I Artisan Shop N N N N N N P N P P P I P P N N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N C C C P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services I Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N C C N C C C C C N C N N N N N N Bed and C C C N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N N N N N Breakfast Inn Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N and Yard I I Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Support Services I Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C c N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business (7) N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N N Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P228 LL C L) 71 se, oning :F 0 Z. 01st Child Day Care N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Facility/Center I I I Consignment N N N N N N C N C C: N C N N N N N N N N N N Store I I I I Convenience N N N N N N P N P p N C Store Crematory Services (7) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Drive-In and Drive-Through N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Sales and Service(8) 1 Equipment Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C P P N N N N and Rental Feed and Tack N N N N N N N N P P N N Store Furniture, Furnishing, and N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N. N P N P P N P P Nursery Grocery Store/ N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N N Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N NJ N I N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N C P N N N N N N Supply Store Hotel and Motel N N N N N N P C N P N N C C P N N N N N N N Internet Caf6 N N N N N N P P P P P P N N N N N N N P P Kennel, N N N N N N N N N c C N C N C C N N N N N N .Commercial J Liquor Store N N N N N N C N C C C1 C C N C C N N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P N P P C N N N N Equipment Massage Establishment N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Medical Marijuana N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N L Dispensary Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P229 Oil Use/Zoning 11" '0 r Medical Services, N C C C C C C P N P P N N P P P N N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N General Medical Services, N N C C C C C C N C N N N N P P N N N N N N 'Hospitals Mobile Hot Food N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Truck Mortuary/Funeral N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home I Office, Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Professional I I I I I I I I I I Office, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P I P P P P P N N N N N N Pawnshop(7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Personal N N N N N N P P P P P- P P P P P N N N N N N Services Restaurant, No N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Liquor Service Restaurant, Beer N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Wine Restaurant, Full N N N N N N C C C c C C c c C C N N N N N N Liquor Service I I I I I I I Retail, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P C C N N N N N N Retail, General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N C- C N N N N N N Retail, N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N N Warehouse Club Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Smoke Shop(7) N N N N N N N N N C C N C N N N N N N N N N Specialty Food N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Store Tattoo Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store (7) N N N N N N C N C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Veterinary C N N N N N C' N P P C C C N N P P P N N N N Facility A'u6 rn 1l6 an&Vdhicle:� ses,; ", 6bli '! Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P230 ' Land Use/, onmg O' "Distract Auto Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N V N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N C N C N N P N C C N N N N N N Sales and Rental Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N Sales, Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N C C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Detailing Recreational N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Vehicle Storage Service Stations N N N N N N C C C P C N C C C C N N N N N N Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N C N N N N Major P P P Vehicle Services, Minor N N N N N N N C C P N N C N PIP N N N N N N Industrial"'Manufacturin„g , and PmUses Fuel Storage and Distribution N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Custom Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Heavy Manufacturing, Heavy-Minimum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Impact Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Light Manufacturing, Medium �9� N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Printing and N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N N Publishing Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N P P P N N N N Collection Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P231 Land; d se , mni CL Ib Z Ing �:Oa.Z District Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap N N N N N N N N N IN IN N N N N N N C N N N N and Dismantling Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Development Storage, Personal Storage N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Facility I Storage N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Warehouse I Storage Yard N N N N N N N I N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution — C Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Distribution— Light Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution— Medium (9) Table Notes: (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86. Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions C. Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P232 3. Gertifoed Farmers Market. A temperaFy use where the r.rima Fy t*Vwt i vegetables n,,tc heFbs egg haRey, flowers and fGGd predHGto from Cede. D. Utility, Transportation, Public Facility and Communication Uses 7. Wind Energy System — Small. A machine which can convert kinetic energy in wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy intended primarily for on-site consumption, but may transfer excess energy into the electrical grid. Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. 6. Rail Service. Properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines shall provide rail service access. Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the railroad and the Public Utilities Commission. The following rail service standards shall, unless modified by the railroad or the Public Utilities Commission apply to all industrial properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track — 32 feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track — 41 feet. c. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed 2 ercent. e. Dock height shall be no less than 4.5 feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade should be avoided wherever possible. Article IV Site Development Provisions Chapter 17.48 Fences, Walls, and Screening Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P233 Section 17.48.050 Requirements by Land Use Type TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA Location or . Location of Fence/WalllScreening .Minimum Setback Maximum Height`(') of;Fence'�');(�) Required front yard area 0 ft(Z) 3 ft/6 ft(3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along rear 0 ft 6 ft and interior property lines) Required street side yard area (along corner side (2) property lines) 5 ft 6 ft At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways within Varies(4) 30 in the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 ft 6 ft Section 17.64.090 Loading Area Requirements C. Requirements for Off-Street Loading Spaces. 4. Trailer Parking Required. One space of parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is fifty feet (50') in length, Riee—fourteen feet (914') in width, and fourteen feet (14') in vertical clearance. Chapter 17.74 Sign Regulations for Private Property Section 17.74.090 .Allowed Temporary On-Site Sign Standards TABLE 17.74.090-1 ALLOWED TEMPORARY ON-SITE SIGN STANDARDS �Develo meat Standards 7 . p Si , Maxunurii Mir imum�� gn Type Maximum Number , Maximum Area from Height` Pe itt ROWI'I r rmed . On-Site Subdivision Signs 1 sign per street 32 sf per side, General Signs frontage of the max 2 sides (64 15 ft 5 ft boundary of the sf total) project Flags 6 flags 15 sf per flag 15 ft 5 ft All Other Uses (2) Wall 1 sign per t3> Roofline 5 ft establishment 50 sf Ground Sign 8 ft 5 ft Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P234 Development Standards S�9n TYpe Maximum a m Minium �� �, ,Maximu Di m �� m Number�' Maximum Area iY Setback from h Height,: t „r r BROW' vl Permitted a Flags 1 flag 4_15-30 sf per flag 15 +Rft 5 +Rft Chapter 17.76 Solar AGGessAlternative Energy Systems and Facilities Sections: Section 17.76.010 Purpose and Applicability.............................................................. 17.76-133 Section 17.76.020 SpeGial-Development Criteria for Solar Systems........................... 17.76-133 Section 17.76.020 Development Standards for Wind Energy Systems..................17.76-4 Section 17.76.010 Purpose and Applicability This Chapter sets forth provisions for the development of alternative energy systems to protect public health and safety while supporting efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid. Section.17.76.020 SpeGial Development Criteria for Solar Systems A. All new.residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east—west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). 1. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and to other design and improvement requirements. 2. Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority of individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. B. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown so as to cast a shadow greater than ten percent (10%) of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10_-a.m. and 2 p.m., provided that this Section shall not apply to specific trees and shrubs which at the time of installation of a solar collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle cast a shadow upon that solar collector. C. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations and to be set back not less than five feet (5') from the property line or any easement that is adjacent to the property line. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P235 D. Developers of all new residential subdivisions shall dedicate easements for the purpose of assuring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixture, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. Section 17.76.030 Development Standards for Wind Energy Systems A. General Development Standards. 1. Siting. Wind energy systems are prohibited on ridgelines. 2. Setbacks. All wind energy systems shall comply with existing setbacks for the zone in which it is located as well as any fire code setback requirements. 3. Color. Structural components including but not limited to towers and blades shall be of a nonreflective unobtrusive color. 4. Guy Wires. The use of guy wires is prohibited. Towers shall be self supporting. 5. Utility Connections. For inter-connected systems, no wind energy system shall be installed until evidence has been presented that the electric utility service provider has been notified and indicated that the proposed interconnection is acceptable. On-site electrical wires associated with the system shall be installed underground except for "tie-ins" to the electric utility service provider and its transmission poles, towers and lines. 6. Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting on any wind energy system shall be prohibited unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 7. Signs. No advertising sign or logo shall be placed or painted on any wind energy system, including towers and blades. 8. Noise. All wind energy systems are subject to noise standards as outlined in Section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards). 9. Rotor Safety. All wind energy systems must be equipped with manual and automatic over-speed controls to limit the rotational speed of the blades within the design limits of the rotor. 10. Electromagnetic Interference. All wind energy systems shall be designed, installed and operated so that no distrupting electromagnetic interference is caused. Disruptive interference from the facility shall be promptly rectified to include the discontinued operation of the wind energy system. 11. FAA Regulations. All wind energy systems shall comply with applicable FAA regulations, including any necessary approvals for installations close to airports. B. Residential Site Development Standards. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P236 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 40 feet in height above grade level. ii. Roof mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems — 1 per parcel. ii. Roof mounted systems — 2 per parcel. C. Industrial Site Development Standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 80 feet above grade level. ii. Roof mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems — 2 per parcel. ii. Roof mounted systems —4 per parcel. 3. Tower Access. Towers must provide one of the following i. Tower climbing apparatus located no closer than 12 feet from the ground; J. Have an anti-climb device installed on the tower iii. Provide a tower-access limitation program approved by the reviewing authority. D. Abandoned Wind Energy Systems. Any wind energy system that is not used for a consecutive 12 month period shall be deemed abandoned. The property owner or permittee shall remove the wind energy system clear the site of all equipment and restore the site as nearly as practicable to +sthe condition prior to the installation of the wind energy system. Article V Specific Use Requirements Chapter 17.102 Special Regulated Uses Section 17.102.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is to establish site planning, development, and/or operating standards for check cashing businesses, pawnshops, smoke shops, tattoo parlors, and thrift stores, Creamatoriums, and Massage Establishments. It is the City's intent, in establishing these standards, to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of these uses and activities on adjacent and surrounding land uses by requiring special siting and location standards and imposing other special development standards. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P237 Section 17.102.080 Massage Establishments A. Applicability. The development standards of this Section shall apply to all massage establishments in the city. B. Hours of Operation. The hours of operation of massage establishments shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily. Article VIII Glossary Chapter 17.126 Universal Definitions Section 17.126.020 Universal Definitions Certified Farmers Market. A temporary use where the primary activity is the outdoor sales of food and farm produce such as fruits, vegetables nuts herbs eggs honey, flowers, and food products from livestock, and that is certified by the State of California and operated in accordance with Article 1 Division 17 Chapter 10.5 of the Agricultural Code. Chapter 17.136 Sign Definitions Section 17.126.020 Sign Definitions Flag Sign. A sign made of fabric or other similar non-rigid material supported or anchored along only one edge or supported or anchored at only two corners. 9-aRy of the flag is Fnc)re thaR three tomes as IG)Rg as aRY other dimeRsion, it us Addendum to the P238 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report ADDENDUM This Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "EIR") has been prepared in connection with the City's supplemental amendment to the Development Code (the "Project"). The Addendum confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and that a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is not required for the Project. Proposed Supplemental Development Code Amendments The Project consists of supplemental amendments to the City's recently adopted comprehensive Development Code, which was in turn adopted to implement the policies of the recently completed 2010 General Plan Update. Since adoption of the Development Code update in July 2012, City staff has identified several errors and omissions in the Development Code that were never intended to be part of the Code. The purpose of the Project is to correct these errors and omissions. It is therefore considered to.be largely procedural in nature. Table A-1 summarizes the changes proposed in the project and the reason for including into the Development Code. Table A-1:Summary of Proposed Changes to the Development Code a 60, 14 t 0.4 NO?r Unintentionally included. This type II 17.16 Remove Minor Development Review of noticing was previously not applications from noticing requirement. required and was not intended to be required. Technical error. During the Development Code Update, this Rewrite this section to reflect the notice of was originally designed as a notice II 17.16 application process. of decision, not notice of application. The name was changed, but the procedure was not. Clarify that action is appealable to the City Council, not that the City Council has final II 17.16 action on a tree removal permit for a Revision needed to clarify historic landmark tree. The process procedural requirements. involved is not a Landmark Designation, but a Certificate of Appropriateness. Delete the alternative use permit This section became obsolete as a II 17.18 procedures section. result of other changes in the Development Code Update. Modify the noticing requirement for minor The language in this section II 17.18 alterations to historic structures to be became obsolete as a result of consistent with other Planning Director other changes in the Development decisions. Code Update. Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 Addendum to the P239 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report L ,3 11a tN � Yrl sf 5 -/I L Pt ( Y"q L 1f+'N rx P k y , ^ .-3'? Articles Chapter �ProposedwChange � : ., Revise Automobile Uses from conditionally Error in translation of the Land Use III 17.30 permitted use to permitted by right with Table. development standards in Industrial Zones. Change Wholesale, Storage, and Error in translation of the Land Use III 17.30 Distribution - Heavy from a Permitted use Table. to a Conditionally Permitted use in GI. Change Indoor Fitness and Sports facilities Error in translation of the Land Use III 17.30 as a permitted use in CC. Large will require Table. a CUP,Small permitted by right. Delete the definition of "Certified Farmers Market" from this section as that use is not placed in the wrong section of the III 17.32 included in the land use table. Make sure Code. this definition is in the temporary use section or the glossary. III 17.32 Reinstate Animal Sales and Grooming as a Error in translation of the Land Use permitted use in CC. Table. Error in calculation found prior to III 17.36 Reinstate FAR for Single Family Residential adoption of the Development Code development. Update. Has been revised accordingly. Update the map with the corrected zoning The zoning map was corrected III 17.38 for the parcel on Foothill between Center prior to adoption, but this map was and Hermosa. not. III 17.36 Reincorporate Rail Service Standards from Omitted in error previous Development Code. IV 17.48 Reincorporate fencing standards for Omitted in error outdoor recreation courts. IV 17.64 Revise Trailer Parking Dimension from 9 Technical error. Wrong standard feet wide to 14 feet wide. was applied. Maximum area for flag signs is not realistic. Does not adequately capture the type of Also, the definition of flag sign will IV 17.74 signs we were trying to permit. There is need to be modified. also a typo for the maximum height - it should be 15 feet, not inches. Clearly define screen/screening to provide IV 17.48 Code Enforcement required regulations to Omitted in error maintain a 3 foot high hedge height in the front yard. Various Develop standards for small wind energy Directed by Planning Commission systems The Project will not affect the current methods of conducting environmental review for new development applications. Page 2 of 6 Addendum to the P240 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report The 2010 General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report On May 19, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan Update and certified the EIR. The updated plan serves as the foundation for many of the City's regulatory documents, including the Development Code, specific plans, community plans, master plans, and design guidelines. With the 2010 General Plan Update, the City's focus shifted to infill development (development of remaining vacant properties within developed business districts and residential neighborhoods). The EIR evaluated potential for the 2010 General Plan Update to result in environmental impacts, as summarized in the following table: No Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significant and Unavoidable Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Agricultural Resources Geology and Soils Materials Air Quality Population, Housing and Hydrology and Water Quality Climate Change Employment Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Public Services Noise Parks and Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems The City ,made findings regarding the environmental impacts of adopting the General Plan as well as overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts, both individually and cumulatively, for the following issues: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change, and Mineral Resources. The findings made by the City necessary to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan also included a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. For impacts to Land Use and Planning, the City determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the General Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR resulting in a less than significant impact. More specifically the City's findings stated there would be no conflict between the General Plan and the land Development Code because updates to the land Development Code, as well as adherence to standard conditions related to consistency of future development with the proposed 2010 General Plan Update and the City's Development Code will reduce the potential impacts related to plan consistency to a less than significant level. CEQA Review Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") generally requires agencies to analyze the possible environmental impacts of a project prior to approval. Depending on the nature and extent of the potential impacts, the agency may be required to adopt a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report(EIR). Page 3 of 6 Addendum to the P241 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified or a Negative Declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative,Declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the none of these conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration are met, but minor technical changes or additions are necessary to a previously adopted environmental document are needed, Section 16164 of the CEQA Guidelines allow the lead agency to prepare an addendum to the prior environmental document. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant should be included in the addendum, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted Negative Declaration, and must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project. Page 4 of 6 Addendum to the P242 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Analysis This addendum to the EIR has been prepared for the Project because none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration are met. First, the Project does not propose substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan specifically mentions revising and updating the Development Code, as shown in the following table. The Development Code shall be updated to reflect the density and LU-2.1, LU-2.2, LU-3.3, LU- intensity ranges (especially along Foothill Boulevard) as specified in 3.8, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.5, the General Plan including updating the development standards to LU-5.1, LU-9.5, ED-2.1, ED- be consistent with the General Plan provisions. (Table LU-2 of 2.4 ED-4.4 Chapter 2) The Development Code shall be updated to develop guidelines or LU-2.4, LU-9.1, LU-9.2, LU- standards that will guide infill development and make it compatible 9.4, ED-1.4, ED-4.1 with the surrounding neighborhood communities The proposed project does not change either the policies or the figures shown in both the EIR and the General Plan. The project does not change any densities, intensities, land uses, or designations beyond those analyzed in the EIR. As a result, there is no change in the project and no new significant environmental effects,or increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Second, there have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The EIR, which addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land Development Code, was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Third, there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known.with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows (a) the Project will have any significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) the significant effects examined Page 5 of 6 Addendum to the P243 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report in the EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan there are no new effects that were not discussed in the EIR. Similarly, the Project will not result in changes to the impacts identified in the EIR that could be considered substantially more severe. The Project does not alter any of the review processes in place for new projects, nor does it exempt new uses in the zoning ordinance from review. The Project addresses areas of responsibility for development review and affirms the appropriate body to make recommendations clarifies appeal procedures and establishes project review timelines. None of these changes will result in physical changes to the environment inconsistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the EIR. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Summary In sum, the General Plan EIR sufficiently analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed Development Code Update. The City has a thorough development review process that is fully documented in the General Plan EIR, and that will remain in place following the proposed project. Page 6 of 6 P244 ORDINANCE NO. 858 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2012-01056, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On November 14, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 12-47, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On December 19, 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on December 19, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City desires to adopt a supplemental update to the Development Code in order to (i) reinstate development standards that were unintentionally omitted; (ii) correct errors in translation of the allowed land use tables; and (iii) clarify existing regulations; and b. The City has prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment 1. SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment 2 to this Resolution, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Development Code Update were adequately addressed in the Final EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively "CEQA"). SECTION 4: The City Council hereby adopts the Amendments to the Development Code attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment 1. SECTION 5: The Council hereby directs the City Clerk to make all necessary, non- substantive conforming revisions to the Municipal Code necessary to codify this Ordinance, P245 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.858 DRC2012-01056— DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT December 19, 2012 Page 2 including, but not limited to, clerical corrections to section numbers, table and figure references and cross references. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a Summary of this Ordinance to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P246 Staff is recommending the following amendments to the Development Code. These amendments are shown in track changes as excerpts from relevant sections of the Development Code with new language shown with underlined text and existing language to be removed shown with strike out text. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures Chapter 17.16 Planning Director Decisions Section 17.16.025 Director Determination Process (with Notice) B. Applicability. Notice for Director Determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree Removal Permit(only if six [6] or more) 2. Minor Exceptions 3. Conditional Use Permits 4. M.iRGF n Desig Review via,. V-iV YY C. Notice of Application. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in Subsection B above shall be mailed to persons owning property within six hundred sixty feet (660') of the project site; in the case of tree removal permits or minor exceptions, notice is only required to adjacent properties. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the City G44ess a wFitteR Fequest for appealfol.lowing an open public comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten (10) days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights._ — 1. the deat�,o. v 2. 3. FiRdineS as li v - r the v based an t� eria, standar ils, Rd'faGt�-&#forth 4. Section 17.16.080 Tree Removal Permit G. Historic Landmark Designation. Where the trees in question are designated as a Historic Landmark, a request for a Tree Removal Permit shall be subject to review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission and Certificate of Appropriateness procedure pursuant to Chapter 17.18 (Historic Preservation ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P247 Commission Decisions). The action of the Historic Preservation Commission shall-tae feFwaFded can be appealed to the City Council. Chapter 17.18 Historic Preservation Commission Decisions Section 17.18.040 Certificate of Appropriateness D. Procedures. 3. Planning Director Review. Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, the Planning Director shall review, and after providing notice to the surrounding property owners, shall deny, approve, or conditionally,approve any application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for any of the following types of alterations: i. Repair or replacement of deteriorated materials with applications or materials of the same kind, type, and texture already in use for roofs, windows, siding material, chimneys and fireplaces, accessory structures, or fencing. ii. Addition or deletion of awnings, shutters, canopies, and similar incidental appurtenances. Section 17.18.100 Preservation Incentives H. paragraph shall enly be fE)F GMall GGale uses, iRGlUdiRg, but Ret limited , shops,Use Permit under this paFagFaph shall ReitheF wai.- an, i-quiremeRt of this Ghapte ' nppd for rtif'n to of d rronri Ress nr CeFtifinat f Cnnnnmin HaFd birt Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P248 Article III Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, And Development Standards Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT VI ........ n I N! r3 UL -U gilzofii 2" i�_ An no-- - _M_ E r t 0 is ric ZwLi . ...._'_ -Wh Residential-Uses Adult Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Caretak Housing er C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C P C P P Dwelling, Multi- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Dwelling, Second P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Unit(') Dwelling, Single- P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family I I I I I I I I I I Dwelling, Two- N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family I I Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N N N N N N Shelter I I I I I I I Family Day Care C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Home, Large I Family Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N C N N Residential Home P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Occupation Live-Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Manufactured Home(3) P P P P N N N N Mobile Home (3) C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park I I Residential Care N N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Residential Care P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Iq P N N Home j Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P249 Land '.-Use/26nin Z' 0 m U11 _Dl1strIct::- Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Transitional P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Housing s�.'%;W ture and Ahima PR elated Use .. .......... Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, Domestic Pets 14) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Animal Keeping, Exotic Animals(4) C C C C c C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Animal Keeping, Insects(4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animal Keeping, Livestock P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animals (4) Animal Keeping, Poultry(4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Equestrian Facility, C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Commercial Equestrian P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility, Hobby W&ieation,-R es-ourctwPreservatio�Mpen:S pace, EdUtztidn,,and'Pu--bli C7 sembWJ ses------.,--- Assembly Use C C C C C C CIC I C C C C C C C C N N N_ N N N Cemetery/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N Mausoleum Community c C C C C C C C C C C C C N P P N N N C N N Center/Civic Use Community c C C c c c N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Garden Convention N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N Center Golf Course/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Clubhouse Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N C N C C P P P N N N N N N N N N Entertainment Facility Indoor Fitness N and Sports N N N N N N C C C C C C N C C C N N N N N N Facility—Large Proposed R.evisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P250 -Land'� 0 Q 0_1 9(w , UsUse/Zoning ,,.. - ---- 2 0 'Z (D U) Distridt ---------- 0 -- Indoor Fitness N and Sports N N N N N N P P P P P C N P C C N N N N N N Facility—Small Library and C C C C C C P P P P N P N P C N N N C' C C' C' Museum Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N C C C C N N C C C C N N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Plaza Public Safety C C c C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N Facility Resource- Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic C C C C C C C T C C � C T C C N N N C N N (Private) School, Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N N P N N (Public) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, College/ University C C C � c C C C C C C C C C C C C N NJ N C N N (Public) Schools, Specialized N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Education and Training/Studio Theaters and N N N � N N N C N N C N N P NJ N � N N N N N N N Auditoriums I I I I I I I I I I I I I Tutoring Center— N N N N N N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N Large Tutoring Center— N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N Small Utility, TransportatI6 Public Facilit- and -0 nnUnlcation U s e s Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N N Studios Park and Ride N N N N N N N C C C N N N N P P N N N N N N Facility t PH fI_ P [ f t I— I Parking Facility N N I N I N N I N P N P C tN tC I C C C C N N C C Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P251 Land` 0_ Use D_ gg =District Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based Structures(5) Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines (5) Wind Energy System_ - P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Small ' Retail, Service, and Office3Uses Adult Day Care N N N N N N C C C C N N N C C C N N N N N N Facility Adult-Oriented Business(6) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A A N N N N Alcoholic N N N N N N C N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Beverage Sales Ambulance N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N C P P N N N N Service Animal Sales and N N N N N N P N P P N P N N N N N N N N N N Grooming P Art, Antique, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Collectable Shop Artisan Shop N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N C C C P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N I N N N C C N C C C C C N C N N N N N N Bed and C C C N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N N N N N Breakfast Inn Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N and Yard Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Support Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing Business(7) N N N N N N P N P P N flN N N P N N N N N N N Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P252 Land � - � x — �= a tv v v v v O x- Use/Zoning g x g_ O z C9 =c�_ rn v a }0 �_-t'_4 70 x District M mw Child Day Care N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Facility/Center Consignment Store N N N N N N C N C C N C N N N N N N N N N N Convenience N N N N N N P N P P N C N N C C N N N N N N Store Crematory N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Drive-In and Drive-Through N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Sales and Service(8) Equipment Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C P P N N N N and Rental Feed and Tack N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Store Furniture, Furnishing, and N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P N P P N P P Nursery Grocery Store/ N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N N Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N C P N N N N N N Supply Store Hotel and Motel N I N N N N N P C N P N N C C P N N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Kennel, N N N N N N N N N C C N C N C C N N N N N N Commercial Liquor Store N N N N N N C N C C C C C N C C N N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P N P P C N N N N Equipment Massage N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Establishment Medical Marijuana N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dispensary Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P253 Land- -2- 0 z (D 0 -.-Cn-. .01 Zdm- Use/Zonin 9 District Medical Services, N C C C C C C P N P P N N P P P N N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P P N N N N N N General Medical Services, N N C C C C C C N C N N N N P P N N N N N N Hospitals I Mobile Hot Food N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Truck Mortuary/Funeral N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Office, Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Professional I Office, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Pawnshop(7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Personal N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Restaurant, No N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Liquor Service I— Restaurant, Beer N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N and Wine Restaurant, Full N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Liquor Service I I I I I I I I Retail, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P C C N N N N N N Retail, General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N C C N N N N N N Retail, N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N N Warehouse Club Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Smoke Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N C C N C N N N N N N N N N Specialty Food N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Store I I I I I Tattoo Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N C N C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Veterinary C N N N N N C N P P C C C N N P P P N N N N Facility --------------- -U s- e-s—7-- AutomobPeznd Vehicle- Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P254 =Land OUse Zoning LL v Districf: Auto Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N C N C N N P N C C N N N N N N Sales and Rental Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle Sales, Wholesale N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N I P P N N P N N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N C C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Detailing Recreational N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Vehicle Storage Service Stations N N N N N N C C C P C N C C C C N N N N N N Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N N N N N N Major P P P Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N C C P N N C N P P N N I N FN TNN Minor Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses Fuel Storage and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N Distribution Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Custom Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Heavy Manufacturing, Heavy-Minimum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Impact Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Light Manufacturing, Medium c9> N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Printing and N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N N Publishing Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N P P P N N N N Collection Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P255 land Use/Zonin "O a: _ Ocn x 9 x= District- n Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N and Dismantling Facility Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Development Storage, Personal Storage N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Facility Storage N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Warehouse Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N R P P N N N N Distribution— C Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Distribution— Light Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution — Medium (9) Table Notes: (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86. Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions C. Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembly Uses. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P256 3. Gortified Farmers Market d temr.eFaFy use where the pFimory aGtivity icy try-the out nr saie of feed and farm PFGd Ge s Gh as fru s vegetables, Ruts, herbs, eggs, hORey, flowers, and feed PFGdUGtS fF aGGGrdanGe with Artk;le 1, DiViSieR 17, Chapter 10.5 of the AgFiGuItt D. Utility, Transportation, Public Facility and Communication Uses 7. Wind Energy System — Small. A machine which can convert kinetic energy in wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy intended primarily for on-site consumption, but may transfer excess energy into the electrical grid. .Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. 6. Rail Service. Properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines shall provide rail service access. Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the railroad and the Public Utilities Commission. The following rail service standards shall, unless modified by the railroad or the Public Utilities Commission apply to all industrial properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track — 32 feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track — 41 feet. c. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed 2 percent. e. Dock height shall be no less than 4.5 feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade should be avoided wherever possible. Article IV Site Development Provisions Chapter 17.48 Fences, Walls, and Screening Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P257 Section 17.48.050 Requirements by Land Use Type TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA Location 1Minimum Setback = Maximum Height ... of Fence h1,tz1 Required front yard area 0 ft(z) 3 ft/6 ft c3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along rear 0 ft 6 ft and interior property lines) Required street side yard area(along corner side 5 ft(2) 6 ft property lines) At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways within Varies(4) 30 in the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 ft 6 ft Section 17.64.090 Loading Area.Requirements C. Requirements for Off-Street Loading Spaces. 4. Trailer Parking Required. One space of parking for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is fifty feet (50') in length, Piae—fourteen feet (914') in width, and fourteen feet (14') in vertical clearance. Chapter 17.74 Sign Regulations for Private Property Section 17.74.090 Allowed Temporary On-Site Sign Standards TABLE 17.74.090-1 ALLOWED TEMPORARY ON-SITE SIGN STANDARDS e ve merit Standards p e Maximum = - Minimum Sign Type maximum ., Number Maximum Area Setback from Height= Permitted= ROW On-Site Subdivision Signs 1 sign per street 32 sf per side, General Signs frontage of the max 2 sides (64 15 ft 5 ft boundary of the sf total) project Flags 6 flags 15 sf per flag 15 ft 5 ft All Other Uses (2) Wall 1 sign per c3) Roofline 5 ft establishment 50 sf Ground Sign 8 ft 5 ft Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P25$ Development`Standards = An Sign Type Maximum = Maximum , Minimum Number Maximum Area Setback from _ - =Height - P-_ermitted _ - _ — ROW Flags 1 flag 4-&-30 sf per flag 15+oft 5 iRft Chapter 17.76 Solar- Ac;GessAlternative Energy Systems and Facilities Sections: Section 17.76.010 Purpose and Applicability..........................................................17.76-134-33 Section 17.76.020 Special Development Criteria for Solar Systems.......................17.76-134-33 Section 17.76.020 Development Standards for Wind Energy Systems..................17.76-4 Section 17.76.010 Purpose and Applicability This Chapter sets forth provisions for the development of alternative energy systems solar aGG to protect public health and safety while supporting efforts to develop small-scale distributed energy generation to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid. to eR „re that all residential preperties have adequate aGGeE;G W sunlight. The PFOViE;iGRG of this SeGtien apply equally te all FeSideRtial distriGts. Section 17.76.020 Speo+al-Development Criteria for Solar Systems A. All new residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east–west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). 1. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and to other design and improvement requirements. 2. Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority of individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. B. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown so as to cast a shadow greater than ten percent (10%) of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10_-a.m. and 2 p.m., provided that this Section shall not apply to specific trees and shrubs which at the time of installation of a solar collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle cast a shadow upon that solar collector. C. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations and to be set back not less than five feet (5) from the property line or any easement that is adjacent to the property line. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P259 D. Developers of all new residential subdivisions shall dedicate easements for the purpose of assuring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixture, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. Section 17.76.030 Development Standards for Wind Energy Systems A. General Development Standards. 1. Siting. Wind energy systems are prohibited on ridgelines. 2. Setbacks. All wind energy systems shall comply with existing setbacks for the zone in which it is located as well as any fire code setback requirements. 3. Color. Structural components including, but not limited to, towers and blades shall be of a nonreflective unobtrusive color. 4. Guy Wires. The use of guy wires is prohibited. Towers shall be self supporting. 5. Utility Connections. For inter-connected systems, no wind energy system shall be installed until evidence has been presented that the electric utility service provider has been notified and indicated that the proposed interconnection is acceptable. On-site electrical wires associated with the system shall be installed underground, except for "tie-ins" to the electric utility service provider and its transmission poles, towers and lines. 6. Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting on any wind energy system shall be prohibited unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 7. Signs. No advertising sign or logo shall be placed or painted on any wind energy system, including towers and blades. 8. Noise. All wind energy systems are subject to noise standards as outlined in Section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards). 9. Rotor Safety. All wind energy systems must be equipped with manual and automatic over-speed controls to limit the rotational speed of the blades within the design limits of the rotor. 10. Electromagnetic Interference. All wind energy systems shall be designed installed and operated so that no distrupting electromagnetic interference is caused. Disruptive interference from the facility shall be Promptly rectified to include the discontinued operation of the wind energy stem. 11. FAA Regulations. All wind energy systems shall comply with applicable FAA regulations, including any necessary approvals for installations close to airports. B. Residential Site Development Standards. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P260 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 40 feet in height above grade level. ii. Roof mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems— 1 per parcel. ii. Roof mounted systems — 2 per parcel. C. Industrial Site Development Standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 80 feet above grade level. ii. Roof mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems — 2 per parcel. ii. Roof mounted systems — 4 per parcel. 3. Tower Access. Towers must provide one of the following i. Tower climbing apparatus located no closer than 12 feet from the ground: ii. Have an anti-climb device installed on the tower: iii. Provide a tower-access limitation program approved by the reviewing authority. D. Abandoned Wind Energy Systems. Any wind energy system that is not used for a consecutive 12 month period shall be deemed abandoned. The property owner or permittee shall remove the wind energy system, clear the site of all equipment and restore the site as nearly as practicable to iSthe condition prior to the installation of the wind energy system. Article V Specific Use Requirements Chapter 17.102 Special Regulated Uses Section 17.102.010 Purpose The purpose of this Chapter is.to establish site planning, development, and/or operating standards for check cashing businesses, pawnshops, smoke shops, tattoo parlors, and thrift stores, Creamatoriums, and Massage Establishments. It is the City's intent, in establishing these standards, to mitigate the potential adverse impacts of these uses and activities on adjacent and surrounding land uses by requiring special siting and location standards and imposing other special development standards. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P261 Section 17.102.080 Massage Establishments A. Applicability. The development standards of this Section shall apply to all massage establishments in the city. B. Hours of Operation. The hours of operation of massage establishments shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. daily. Article VIII Glossary Chapter 17.126 Universal Definitions Section 17.126.020 Universal Definitions Certifier) Farmers Market. A temporary use where the primary activity is the outdoor sales of food and farm produce such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, herbs, eggs, honey, flowers and food products from livestock, and that is certified by the State of California and operated in accordance with Article 1, Division 17, Chapter 10.5 of the Agricultural Code. Chapter 17.136 Sign Definitions Section 17.126.020 Sign Definitions Flag Sign. A sign made of fabric or other similar non-rigid material supported or anchored along only one edge or supported or anchored at only two corners. #-any dimension of the flag is meFe than three times as IeRg as any other dimeRsion, it is- December 19,2012-City Council Meeting Item P1.Development Code Amendment DRC2012-01056 ORDINANCE NO.858 (FIRST READING)-Page added to Ordinance 8 m N‘ 0 m t E E m P m CO CO t CO N CO 03 0O C .e CiD r r r N C C C C r 0 m y w 5 m > J v m t Cu a O � CO N CO N 0 m ai o m ' P P V V $ 5 m CO T T co Cu s. 0 ` 0 co K m 2 2 2 2 y re E t 3 '5 '5 '5 co p o ° e >. 2 I- E V 2 x a 2 a m ° m L.z co a m n1 0 0 m m co o 3 e m v c I- M C C M M C c C M m 5 m C y 0 5 —° 8 o Z' e i ° 3 i H E ° E E E E E E a v am a c c c c c ° �� m m Q _ _ z E z E z E z E z E z E _ °m $ v N £ mo5 £ t ma O v c 3 a Z t o O U. ym v CI mm2 ANCN ,-,../. U co 2 I(1 0E.0o.` N U t� O O 7 r V V V V V V V V c � C mG C Q y 0 9CC_ E ° c n m E Z G r«`n r t 8 a 3 m m a F as2 m [La a a a a a a g2m `c� E N '- x x N Z Z Z Z 0 0 0 Z v E 2 m° 0 c e Z U c ..- w 0 .e m a'- a) W e7 C m cZ.E m�i� m in I- 2 I'D' o 1 ° 2NEa3m Cu J E J y v m ^ u m gTS62- a 0 _ rm a _ m z t y t C t t t C t t G t t m E C"S m O p E ut to Lo ut ut N in Lo in CO m£ c' m m 0 E _ a - --- c -C c $ °,@ $� (a — f0. `m - _ E m c�y � E 7 o E 12 e c cr c c c r C c mca rom F�F U G 2 in M o n N 0 u N j Cwyy�mEd O N a o-.44---2 03 x $ .0 a V V V V V V V Zmwa c ma>.m mg C .- « Z P R P P Cu P P Cu cov ro'v, E@Lm mZ. CO CO in IL a s 'E a a a a) a) a ¢0,0 eey �0� 10 0 I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2a �'ummy� Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z °' m E•m a L CD ga.. aE! `' m C • y8E O. m O co 3 tq m 2 2 Cu m 20.$ gj ''mF3m�'a� a > >15 co E NN hp .ICY "a�2 o -t CC Cu ~ 2 2 2 .0 C t O , Em2�aoE' SZ�E w 0 w tyi E 0 Cu t1 2E � mE$ 9i � 0.L�i CO V 1-a) 80< 2 0 p° ii N o 0- m `p ci) 0 mi uex EE >LLcci_.z O 2 C d ' C IL 0 j a� m a y 320 0 0 2 0 E m E m ' 2 o a m o o m 0 Cu 0 CI- 0 a a d 0 Oli F � ' , "mC Addendum to the P262 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report ADDENDUM This Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "EIR") has been prepared in connection with the City's supplemental amendment to the Development Code (the "Project"). The Addendum confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Project. Proposed Supplemental Development Code Amendments The Project consists of supplemental amendments to the City's recently adopted comprehensive Development Code, which was in turn adopted to implement the policies of the recently completed 2010 General Plan Update. Since adoption of the Development Code update in July 2012, City staff has identified several errors and omissions in the Development Code that were never intended to be part of the Code. The purpose of the Project is to correct these errors and omissions. It is therefore considered to be largely procedural in nature. Table A-1 summarizes the changes proposed in the project and the reason for including into the Development Code. Table A-1:Summary of Proposed Changes to the Development Code Article fxChapter, ;` Proposed Change a Reason Unintentionally included. This type II 17.16 Remove Minor Development Review of noticing was previously not applications from noticing requirement. required and was not intended to be required. Technical error. During the Development Code Update, this Rewrite this section to reflect the notice of was originally designed as a notice II 17.16 application process. of decision, not notice of application. The name was changed, but the procedure was not. Clarify that action is appealable to the City Council, not that the City Council has final II 17.16 action on a tree removal permit for a Revision needed to clarify historic landmark tree. The process procedural requirements. involved is not a Landmark Designation, but a Certificate of Appropriateness. 17.18 Delete the alternative use permit This section became obsolete as a II procedures section. result of other changes in the Development Code Update. Modify the noticing requirement for minor The language in this section II 1718 alterations to historic structures to be became obsolete as a result of consistent with other Planning Director other changes in the Development decisions. Code Update. Page 1 of 6 ATTACHMENT 2 Addendum to the P263 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Article Chapter — _ProposedChange �:. " _ ,_'Reason -- _ Revise Automobile Uses from conditionally III 17.30 permitted use to permitted by right with Error in translation of the Land Use Table development standards in Industrial Zones. Change - Wholesale, Storage, and Error in translation of the Land Use III 17.30 Distribution - Heavy from a Permitted use Table to a Conditionally Permitted use in GI. Change Indoor Fitness and Sports facilities Error in translation of the Land Use III 17.30 as a permitted use in CC. Large will require Table a CUP,Small permitted by right. Delete the definition of "Certified Farmers Market" from this section as that use is not placed in the wrong section of the III 17.32 included in the land use table. Make sure Code. this definition is in the temporary use section or the glossary. III 17.32 Reinstate. Animal Sales and Grooming as a Error in translation of the Land Use permitted use in CC. Table Error in calculation found prior to III 17.36 Reinstate FAR for Single Family Residential adoption of the Development Code development. Update. Has been revised accordingly. Update the map with the corrected zoning The zoning map was corrected III 17.38 for the parcel on Foothill between Center prior to adoption, but this map was and Hermosa. not. III 17.36 Reincorporate Rail Service Standards from Omitted in error previous Development Code. Reincorporate fencing standards for IV 17.48 Omitted in error outdoor recreation courts. IV 17.64 Revise Trailer Parking Dimension from 9 Technical error. Wrong standard feet wide to 14 feet wide. was applied. Maximum area for flag signs is not realistic. Does not adequately capture the type of Also, the definition of flag sign will IV 17.74 signs we were trying to permit. There is need to be modified also a typo for the maximum height - it should be 15 feet, not inches. Clearly define screen/screening to provide Code Enforcement required regulations to IV 17.48 Omitted in error maintain a 3 foot high hedge height in the front yard. Various Develop standards for small wind energy Directed by Planning Commission systems The Project will not affect the current methods of conducting environmental review for new development applications. Page 2 of 6 Addendum to the P264 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report The 2010 General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report On May 19, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan Update and certified the EIR. The updated plan serves as the foundation for many of the City's regulatory documents, including the Development Code, specific plans, community plans, master plans, and design guidelines. With the 2010 General Plan update, the City's focus shifted to infill development (development of remaining vacant properties within developed business districts and residential neighborhoods). The EIR evaluated potential for the 2010 General Plan Update to result in environmental impacts, as summarized in the following table: No Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significant and Unavoidable Agricultural Resources Cultural Resources Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Agricultural Resources Geology and Soils Materials Air Quality Population, Housing and Hydrology and Water Quality Climate Change Employment Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Public Services Noise Parks and Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems The City made findings regarding the environmental impacts of adopting the General Plan as well as overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts, both individually and cumulatively, for the following issues: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change, and Mineral Resources. The findings made by the City necessary to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan also included a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. For impacts to Land Use and Planning, the City determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the General Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR resulting in a less than significant impact. More specifically the City's findings stated there would be no conflict between the General Plan and the land development code because updates to the land development code, as well as adherence to standard conditions related to consistency of future development with the proposed 2010 General Plan Update and the City's Development Code will reduce the potential impacts related to plan consistency to a less than significant level. CEQA Review Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") generally requires agencies to analyze the possible environmental impacts of a project prior to approval. Depending on the nature and extend of the potential impacts, the agency may be required to adopt a negative declaration or environmental impact report (EIR). Page 3 of 6 Addendum to the P265 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the none of these conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met, but minor technical changes or additions are necessary to a previously adopted environmental document are needed, Section 16164 of the CEQA Guidelines allow the lead agency to prepare an addendum to the prior environmental document. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant should be included in the addendum, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration, and must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project. Page 4 of 6 Addendum to the P266 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Analysis This addendum to the EIR has been prepared for the Project because none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met. First, the Project does not propose substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan specifically mentions revises and updating the Development Code, as shown in the following table. The Development Code shall be updated to reflect the density and LU-2.1, LU-2.2, LU-3.3, LU- intensity ranges (especially along Foothill Boulevard) as specified in 3.8, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.5, the General Plan including updating the development standards to LU-5.1, LU-9.5, ED-2.1, ED- be consistent with the General Plan provisions. (Table LU-2 of 2.4 ED-4.4 Chapter 2) The Development Code shall be updated to develop guidelines or LU-2.4, LU-9.1, LU-9.2, LU- standards that will guide infill development and make it compatible 9.4,ED-1.4, ED-4.1 with the surrounding neighborhood communities The proposed project does not change either the policies or the figures shown in both the EIR and the General Plan. The project does not change any densities, intensities, land uses, or designations beyond those analyzed in the EIR. As a result, there is no change in the project and no new significant environmental effects,or increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Second, there have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The EIR, which addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land development code, was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Third, there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows (a) the Project will have any significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) the significant effects examined Page 5 of 6 Addendum to the P267 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report in the EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan there are no new effects that were not discussed in the EIR. Similarly, the Project will not result in changes to the impacts identified in the EIR that could be considered substantially more severe. The Project does not alter any of the review processes in place for new projects, nor does it exempt new uses in the zoning ordinance from review. The Project addresses areas of responsibility for development review and affirms the appropriate body to make recommendations clarifies appeal procedures and establishes project review timelines. None of these changes will result in physical changes to the environment inconsistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the EIR. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Summary In sum, the General Plan EIR sufficiently analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed Development Code Update. The City has a thorough development review process that is fully documented in the General Plan EIR, and that will remain in place following the proposed.project. Page 6 of 6 14 E c) tn O r--1 4V N O v-, O 4 p O � N 4) CiSew - \\N-010 a , ti . � 'T� rO fag ct rA O CA� . 0 ra O 1 b�A C ° ti U 0 bbA 0 Cn sj CU ct o 0 0 ° o CU 0 E E - au (1),__ CN1 E Ct czo 0 Q N • a • `'L `' i • • • • r "0 CD CA CA 0 — 'L� �--4 E cs y F1_ v� Ct C4 0 o o et o cd Z � 0 •cn } a .� 0 OO 0 y CA 4) et ti 2 � al 0 I" (;),06, , -.- L. • • • Ct r..► • cil -- ct•Ile‘ C U � 0 � ,N • al � ) U 0 • • O O . ? 0 0 a 0 bO 0 Iii cn (i) ,0 o c, a...) sa, •••li•••1 ,i.) blA et Cl) 0 �' cn U N VI 4--+ 0 a) --� ct • 0 a) 4—' 3 Ct Cn CI) 0 I", 0 „, s--i Z .2 a) (it . o 0 I-1 m . it O Q,, - 0 s,., v < W 4. rn W eir) . . . .: l) -j, 0 CA U Cd ;�O l/ . -4 W k '� ' t O v < 0 U • S-4 ct •� C4 V N 0 0 W O V ^' v O U U Cci E t D.0 1' , r U -2 -d a O -d ° Q c ra - -4 "Mgat. '11.. • • • iir# „ \ \ 4 ,Y„ • I •I f � � 'II I 1 1 I I 1 1II or) Nor *..45 I f f , , I I, )1110 . I f ~ i I ' I I 1 I I III I I I I I I I p/IR I 11 I, y..A y S i.1 ›..1 ■ ", . Yi-t::. 11** ..•-."1". E p1.- 1117:, P., _1sas1M.1 lrl_ cJ r �/' .:. // " 'e E . . . . . .... :fir . . . , .Tv�/ .. l._l4 i.�.M7r. •f J(/([p rif ____ . 411' 1 ... t' S r (.:_rompi, 4, ._'.- ..-.- .. i 4 4, ip• _ , i . ' 44,1* 1 ..-....f. Ail \ li I •. ' c.) ci) 1 oho W • �� ci) -- 941•11bwee 4;4_1 CA CA E ° • `"i O bA 4 c to bA . 4, (+�-+ . r-+ , r, O Ct bA 0 • • • • N O 0 . 5 V CJ) C/D '. U t o stu O ,sz 0 9. g 0 O a C t CD O Cl) L) E 0 • • • • C/) Q t. .f 0 1--, o O el 0 °4- • vn • -1 p • 0 • � , me PX4 W a 0 0 P4 $.0 ct O ma W v • o a) $.0 a) C et 7 O o :� °' U E 7ci it Li W it 0Zt < � (--49 - - • • • 4: fct� 1� to O 0 a E 0 C O a, .� Ti N N cci 0 O o 0 CO o 0 U E E E 0 o°° Q.n0,t Q o O oo p a o 9 4) Z r 0 g 731 U cis > O 4a O . 0 Cid 't ° nom, '� W C I I tilt° Z - -_. fir(` 1 I - "1.-' P268 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Date: December 19, 2012 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Jeffery A. Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development By: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner Subject: TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side at 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption - Minor Alterations In Land Use Limitations). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. ANALYSIS BACKGROUND: Tract 9426 was originally recorded in 1978, and the housing product was also reviewed by the County of San Bernardino at that time. The tract contains 16 lots with single-family residences. The tract of houses is between an Edison Corridor and the Cucamonga Channel. Ranch Gate Road is a north to south traveled local street. The tract was developed with a 15-foot equestrian trail easement that runs along the rear of the properties adjacent to the Cucamonga Channel. This trail has two, 15-foot legs of the equestrian trail easement that extend out to Ranch Gate Road so the trail does not dead end at the flood control corridor that is fenced off at the north end of the trail. One leg runs entirely on the south property line of Lot 10 (5340 Ranch Gate Road). This leg is located at about the halfway mark of the subdivision. The second leg runs between Lots 15 and 16 with 7 feet, 6 inches of the easement on each lot for a 15-foot total easement width. This leg was at the north end of the trail so that riders could go back to the street without having to turn around. Over the past 30 years the two legs have been fenced in and do not provide access for trail users or equestrian riders. The trail easement along the south property line of the residence at 5340 Ranch Gate Road has been closed off and improved with concrete paving and wrought iron gates at the front and a fence at the rear. Photos have been provided which demonstrate that this easement runs within inches of the foundation of the house and that the resident's air conditioning unit is located within the easement. The residents would have difficulty securing their yard if this easement were to remain. P269 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848—RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT December 19, 2012 Page 2 The trail easement shared between the residences at 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road over the years has been closed off with chain link gates on one half of the easement (7 feet, 6 inches), and pilasters with wrought iron on the remaining half (7 feet, 6 inches). This trail runs within 6 feet of the houses. Engineering has applied conditions to the project and has been working with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to enable the trail to continue at the north end of the trail, through the flood control corridor and out onto Turquoise Avenue as requested by the Trails Advisory Committee. On January 13, 2010, the Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Oaxaca, Tisler, Henderson, and Douglass) reviewed the Site Plan and photos of the site and recommended that the applicant be required to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. At the November 10, 2010, Planning Commission Meeting, the Commission requested that staff review the concerns about how much the trail would cost to improve to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District standards. The residents were concerned that this could be an open-ended expenditure and were not sure they wanted to take on this burden without knowing the actual cost of the improvements. Since that meeting, the Engineering Services Department has been in contact with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District trying to find out what that cost would be. After filing for a permit, the Flood Control District requested the following: • The existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Flood Control District be amended to include the segment of trail. • Bring the trail segment up to Flood Control Standards by installing step-throughs with other improvements at three access points and grading of the area around these points to minimize any hazard to the public. • Have the City of Rancho Cucamonga obtain approval from Southern California Edison, as they own a segment of the trail that being requested to be used. • Improve the Community Trail to Flood Control Standards south of Gate 1A as its current condition creates a hazard for pedestrian and/or equestrian use. • Provide a chain link fence along the west end of the Community Trail in order to prevent unauthorized access. P270 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848—RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT December 19, 2012 Page 3 • Amend the existing trail agreement to include this segment and set forth operational and maintenance responsibilities of both agencies necessary for the equestrian trail at this location. The City's Engineering Services Department created an estimate for the cost of all these requirements and the estimated cost was over $107,832.00. This dollar figure was substantially higher than was originally anticipated. After staff found this to be the case, the project was taken back to the Trails Committee, and staff recommended that the Committee rescind their recommendation to require the applicant to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. At the May 9, 2012, meeting of the Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Pallotto, Tisler, Burnett, Henderson, and Douglass), a recommendation by the Planning staff to have the Committee rescind their previous recommendation of requiring the applicant to make improvements and obtain all permits from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to utilize the flood control corridor to connect the trail so that it does not dead end was accepted. The Committee recommended approval of the vacation of the two trail legs with the condition that the north to south trail behind the properties in Tract 9426 be restored and maintained in a usable condition. At the August 22, 2012, Planning Commission meeting, the Commission agreed with the Trails Advisory Committee and recommended that this application move forward to the City Council for approval. GENERAL: The trail abandonment process is outlined in the Trail Implementation Plan. The process first requires a petition to be approved by 100 percent of the property owners within the tract since the easement is part of a recorded final map. Upon receipt of the request, the matter is reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee for recommendation. The next steps would include a review by the Planning Commission and a recommendation to the City Council for final action where City Council will take final action on the matter. The applicant has met all the requirements of this process. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because this project meets all the criteria described in the section and is only an abandonment of a portions of an equestrian trail easement and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site to the properties to the north, south, east, and west. P271 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848—RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT December 19, 2012 Page 4 Respectfully submitted,, j-- Je9ffe y Deputy City Manager/Economic & Community Development JAB:SF/Is Attachments: Exhibit A — Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting on August 22, 2012 Exhibit B — Staff Report for DRC2009-00848 for the Planning Commission Meeting on August 22, 2012 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 P272 compatible with the General Plan; the site is less than 5 acres; it is of no value as habitat to endangered species; there are no significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be served by all required utilities and public services. Charlie Buquet, 7375 Day Creek Boulevard stated he represents the applicant.e applicant cleaned up site and the new use will be more sustainable with many site improveme He said he agrees with the conditions of approval. Chairman.Howdyshell complimented staff for the good work and noted the gre provements and landscaping. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and h -ing no comment, she closed the public hearing. . Vice Chairman Fletcher said he is glad to the City work with the applicant on coordinating/phasing the street improve to coi a with city improvements. Commissioner Munoz noted that hew ..ed with the applicant on this project and the project came to us mostly done. He said it will b a good addition to that part of town. Commissioner Wimberly a deed. Motion: Moved Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for DRC2012-001 nd DRC2012-00182. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: TCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: ONE ABS OAXACA, - carried C. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - DAVID FAJARDO - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 &5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side of 5340 Ranch Gate Road -APNs: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 Exemption - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that the homeowners did their homework and helped staff with the exhibits. A 5-minute recess was taken for technical difficulties. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no public comment, she closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz said this is a good resolution to keep from impacting residents. He moved to recommend adoption of the resolution. Commissioner Wimberly also concurred with the staff recommendation. Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 22, 2012 EXHIBIT A P273 Vice Chairman Fletcher also said he is in favor. He commented that this application appears so simple, but went on for years requiring staff time and expense. Chairman Howdyshell agreed that the residents have endured a lot, and the trail abandonment makes common sense. Motion: Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Munoz, to adopt the Resolution Recommending approval of Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 to be forwarded to the City Council forfinal action. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: NONE ABSENT: OAXACA, - carried USINESS D RE�;,�1r.�AN�=IJPCfii�'T� `� `H'�E���'PUNNING`��'Ol`IS�SI'ON°��4DNlINI:STRATIVE REGULATIONS AND RELATED PROCEDURES Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary presented the staff report. She su rzed the goals of the new regulations and outlined the benefits of the proposed agenda fo t. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney asked that a phrase be changed o ,•age D-12, Section 3- Meetings of the draft regulations. He said the sentence should read, eetings of the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission may be heldiLi currently", as this includes the Historic Preservation Commission and allows that they may a mes hold a meeting separately. Commissioner Munoz felt the new regulations are not m h different than the current ones and supported the update. Commissioner Wimberly said the new order of b siness and agenda format should provide a smoother meeting. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he goes alon with incorporating the policy of a 3 year term limit on the chairmanship. In response to Commissioner M z, Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said in accordance with the Brown Act,the publicist o be given an opportunity to comment before any agendized items are acted upon and this is�PP}�e reason to move public comment forward on the agenda. .He said d multiple items can be vo - upon at once on the Consent Calendar following public comment. Chairman Howdysh7ll said she likes the new format, particularly the merging of the two meetings at once. She said this should be clearer for those wanting to address the Commission. Motion: M v d by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher,to adopt the new Administrative Regulations. Motion carer by the following vote: AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NO` '` NONE ABSENT: OAXACA, - carried Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 22, 2012 P274 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: August 22, 2012 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Jeffrey A. Bloom, Interim Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRAIL ABANDONMENT - DRC2009-00848 — DAVID FAJARDO -A request to abandon two portions of a trail that leads from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 exemption - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND: At the November 10, 2010 Planning Commission Meeting the Commission requested that staff review the concerns about how much the trail would cost to improve to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District standards. The residents were concerned that this could be an open ended expenditure. They were unsure about taking on this burden when they did not know the actual cost of the improvements. Since that meeting the Engineering Services Department has been in contact with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District in an effort to determine the cost. After filing for a permit, the Flood Control District requested the following: • The existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Flood Control District be amended to include the segment of affected trail. • Bring the trail segment up to Flood Control Standards by installing step-throughs with other improvements at three access points and grading of the area around these points to minimize any hazard to the public. • The City of Rancho Cucamonga needs to obtain written approval to use the trail portion owned by Southern California Edison. • Improve the Community Trail to Flood Control Standards south of Gate 1A as its current condition creates a hazard for pedestrians and/or equestrians. • Provide a chain link fence along the west end of the Community Trail in order to prevent unauthorized access. • Amend the existing trail agreement to include this segment and set forth operational and maintenance responsibilities of both agencies necessary for the equestrian trail at this location. The City's Engineering Services Department determined the estimated cost of all these requirements is over $107,832.00. This was much more than was expected. Staff then brought the project back to the Trails Committee and staff recommended that the Committee rescind their recommendation to require the applicant to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County EXHIBIT B P275 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848 —TRAIL ABANDONMENT- DAVID FAJARDO August 22, 2012 Page 2 Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. GENERAL: A. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Oaxaca, Tisler, Henderson, and Douglass) reviewed the site plan and photos of the site on January 13, 2010. They recommended that the applicant obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step-through for pedestrian and equestrian access. Following recommendation from Staff on May 9, 2012, the Trails Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Pallotto, Tisler, Burnett, Henderson, and Douglass) reconsidered and agreed to rescind their previous recommendation of requiring the applicant to make improvements and obtain all permits from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to utilize the flood control corridor to connect the trail so it does not dead end. Instead, they recommended approval of the vacation of the two trail legs with the condition that the north/south trail behind the properties in Tract 9426 be restored and maintained in a usable condition. The homeowners that were present at the meeting indicated their agreement to the proposed condition. B. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because this project meets all the criteria described in the section and is only an abandonment of a portions of an equestrian trail easement and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Tract 9426. Respectfully submitted, *Jre . Bloom Interim Planning Director JAB:SF/dl Attachments: Exhibit A - Tract Map 9426 Exhibit B - Planning Commission minutes dated November 10, 2010 Exhibit C - Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 10, 2010 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 for City Council P276 .4P12lL ?9/ye0 ArV AJT E)ACk1SDA1 AAAi 1 106/-,02 D3 AAlD5�W 4 W/ PNC)R�M( -1-d1/9" AON D!- p4vlo � gGIzAac_77` FA_ 1m Q9_1_ '/v scA 1..E 1"a1m 611 EEsT 2 of TRACT N° 9426 IN THE ClT Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C.4G/FORN/q B61N6 A SUBDIVISION OF A►ORTUN OF L 10,11,AND I2,BLOCK 25.DFTNE CUCAMON°A NOMLSTEAD ASSOCIATION AS RGC."a0 1Y OOOL 6, FAOfi 40�iau IM[ALRDINO /l��iNr^w LDUYTY gFLOROS C cI IMMMON,Li IL EwG1 EER a F w APRIL,11) N.n7a e•e. ) •."FS. c•Ra rffP a2c "�N rccPrcQo s.lw °N • �B [, Mi 'vJ %/•/.w P.V.,m•PAP Aea 1 1'6R OR 9tTt�/ , :.:a....al. _ ... 6 I,� wFrn y E) SLATE 1",loO' " aw 3 < 26 . � „ °• �Q � Ile &4.4,rl�/16A C�Ar�yD�/F/T�L wry A.J+,+': =.x a $ i"r Yy PTi,6;'ro REaA wr6 CURVE DATA s .y a o L H•04' SO" 701.0 aB.10 I. • INDWE5 FIVNI MUY UNENT TAIG60-q I.W PER •��'^ '"°� 1 4� _ ,to Q^ 1'O,' S5" yp.pp 216 es w/T.pR AS YITED Y a �1 • fi. O l 1� `1 41'S4 55" 'S6v0 46.11 2.O Iu01 CATES SET 14'I.P.TA66E0"BCE 11186•,'/:at'.. - acv 17 n Q 2S2'11' 10' 4e.00 •to S.vv PAVED sVRFACE 14 PPV6p AREAL. A © lU 00 41' D.DO 41.10 .•+ +2`REDwOOO STARES IL"LONG PANTED(LED)F6T AT 4ll � a 4 T REAR LOT CORNS RS A90 TAOG D-RCE 11188;5ET�LEAp x iGI I +�� l� ® '3'51 1I i45.a0 '41.51 A.D Tab IN 7pPOF LVRD ON It—PROJECTION IF ALL Yom' !1•i 1�•n Y�i / wr 1NE5. a2 Y '.5` 4. S rRACT NAS IQ LOTS -- STHE DEARI MGS S.- NELFDH ALE BASES VION THE �r T OF.11.1110E ROAD BEING'•N.DS•lY•1E•E•AS ��� - 6NDWN ON TF..1160B,M.D.12A/1•i y = M• S�O� 11/ c.51.L. TN BU DENOTES ILDING ETB SACK LINE,.I N VS'—fit 1.A SOILS REFORT WAS FREPAR6D By RICHARD MILLS ASSKAR 4 ' " N i•II^E Q•7., I, GATED SER.15,.14,5164ED/Y Emme gNmce 7681'1 +• � 1 'l/ \ OENO TES COVNIY SURVEYORS FIELD D00 K. Vy..,'1 •°i'� 3 III D. CL.M. uoTG4 COUNTY fU WEVORS MONUMENT '1k 1 - D. S. P FIST/h/G AGE_ AT .SDI!? Da y EXHIBIT A 514191 l6/VZ- A�1AF w - r \� �t$ as aI o ✓.s 1� SIG 2W9- 00R P277 be brought back before=the-RH" 1 ion. He wished them luck and notedtFi an architecturally bea"ffff ing Motion: Moved by Fletcher, seconded by H.o. �dy ell (4-0-1), to adopt the Resolutions of Approval for Conditional Use Permit PRC2b1e0 0 28 and Entertainment permit DRC2010-00729 with the amended c io.rP#4*W6ol�ion carried by the following vote: AYES: — ZRO,HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: WIMBERLY - carried F. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 &5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on the south side of 5340 Ranch Gate Road-APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305(Class 5 Exemption - minor alterations in land use limitations). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Steve Fowler,Assistant Planner, presented the staff report and displayed overhead photos. He said this is the first time all residents approved a vacation of a trail in 30 years. He mentioned one correction on Page F-22. He said the discussion of Exhibit A-should be the resolution and not the map as indicated in the packet. Steven Flower,Assistant City Attorney clarified that Exhibit A would be the attached draft resolution for Council approval. Commissioner Fletcher asked what the original easements were for because they do not appear to connect with anything. He asked how we built houses on those easements. Mr. Fowler said the homes were built when it was under the County's authority. Commissioner Oaxaca asked if progress has been made towards ironing out any issues with County Flood Control with respect to the improvements and opening the trail exit at the north end of the trail. Mr. Fowler said that is correct. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said that the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) has an emphasis on connectivity. She said that there are some things with plans in place that are on a 5-6 year plan because of budgets and depending on the level of design needed. She said being on the TAC, linkages are important and the connection with Sapphire was really important. She said this proposal is important in recognizing what is already in place. Chairman Munoz asked who will fund the improvements at the north end. Mr. Fowler responded that the residents will be making a deposit, and the City will construct the improvements. Chairman Munoz invited the applicants to comment. Planning Commission Minutes EXHIBIT B November 10, 2010 P278 Dave Fajarda, 5340 Ranch Gate Road, said this project will help maintain the existing fencing and security and would also open it up for City residents to enjoy the trail and therefore is a win-win for all. Patricia Jackson said she lives at 5272 Ranch Gate Road at the top of hill. She said she does not accept this proposal. She said she wants the easement closed due to safety concerns and allows people on their property near their front window. She said the open ended dollar amount for the deposit does not give a final amount and opens up liability for the property owners to defend any actions and City costs. Jack Jackson said when he bought the house, 3 other properties were sold,and one was occupied. He said the neighbors knew of this easement and they were told that if it was not used then it would eventually be abandoned. He said he is primarily concerned about safety, canyon access and related parking. He said there are other obstructions in easements such as driveways, telephone, Edison lines, cable etc., in-ground boxes that are not safe for the weight of horses. He said he wanted the extension to Ranch Gate eliminated. He said he wants the liabilities clarified because they were told they would need a million dollar policy for liability. He said the current gravel improvements are not a proper horse trail. He said there is nothing that defines what improvements will be made. He said he would like to know if utility boxes have to be removed and if so, who will remove them. He reiterated that the property is not the big issue; his concerns focus on security, privacy, traffic and costs. Chairman Munoz asked if there is a problem today with people parking in the cul-de-sac. Mr. Jackson said they are not parking on his cul-de-sac but they are parking at the south end of the tract and down into the canyon. He noted the canyon is sometimes used for paintball. He said that most of the traffic is at the bottom of Ranch Gate Road. Mrs. Jackson noted that sometimes people park to the side of their house in the middle of the night and cars are broken into. Chairman Munoz opened the public hearing. Jim Glascot, 5452 Ranch Gate Road concurred with the Jacksons because there are security issues and there is no need to continue the trail. He said it will cause security risks and it gives a free trail behind their homes opening a liability issue. He said it should remain a dead end. Chairman Munoz asked if they have a trail now. Mr. Glascot said it ends now. He said people walk there now, but because it dead ends,they have to come back down the same way they went up. He said if they open it up, people can drive there and will dump and run. He said he can ride his horse fine the way it is now. Chairman Munoz noted that rails can prevent vehicles from accessing the trail. He asked if he would be opposed to that. Mr. Glascot said he did not oppose that option. Vice Chairman Howdyshell noted that at the Hillside opening there is an opening to the easement with no fencing or rails. Mr. Glascot said it is more like fire break. Vice Chairman Howdyshell said they need a railing so it is not open ended. Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 10, 2010 P279 Mr. Glascot said if they open it up behind those homes, they need some type of blockade because they have had issues already of dumping and this would just make it easier for them to dump behind their homes. David Gunther, 5302 Ranch Gate Road, said all of this is true however,there are some walkers and some horses and he knows people dump trash. He said he is against the gateway at the lower end of the trail because everyone now has some form of vehicular/RV access. He said he does not want that access blocked. He said he wants the easements between the homes to stay as they are. He said he did not see how opening the gates to the County Flood Control should cost ten thousand dollars. He said they should leave it all as it is. He said the residents police it themselves. Chairman Munoz closed the public hearing and asked staff to clarify the ten thousand dollar bond. Steve Fowler noted that the ten thousand dollar bond is an Engineering condition. He said this is an initial fee, and it may not cost that but they are not sure of the price for improvements. Dan James, Senior Engineer, said they are not committed to this price. He said the Capital Improvement design team looked at it and they also have had discussions with County Flood Control. He said they are open to opening the trail and from past experience it appears they would only have to remove the chain link fencing and install horse gates. He said this would not be open to vehicles;similar to what is on Turquoise now. He said they feel a minimum amount of work would need to be done but County Flood Control will not consider it until we submit plans. He said this is why the cost is open ended because they could come up with something new. He said staff honestly feels it will be less, but things are uncertain. Chairman Munoz asked about the concern of access for an RV or vehicles. He asked if there is anyway to mitigate this. Mr. James said that to the south they would need to block off the trail because there will be a horse gate access at the north end. He said there would not be access for outside vehicles but at the south end it could be left as it is now which would still allow those property owners to deliver hay, access RV's, etc.. He added that there is no intent to change the property easement between the neighbors' homes. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked if there is a timeline for the permit process. Mr. James said from the time of the deposit, they should have a more realistic number in 3 months time. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the proposed action has any ties to bonds. Steve Flower,Assistant City Attorney, said the funds described are not a bond, it is a cash deposit. He said the City has property rights and therefore has the authority to negotiate the conditions on the abandonment/seceding of the property to ensure the City's interests are maintained while giving up the property interests. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the trail to the rear of the homes is a Community Trail and if there would be a problem in gating the south access and giving access to the gate to the property owners. Mr. James said it is private trail and staff would not object to them gating that trail and giving the owners keys. Mr. James explained that he (Mr. Jackson)thought it would be wide open access. Mr. James said there will be pipe gates and posts to let horses through but not vehicles. Planning Commission Minutes -7- November 10, 201.0 P280 Commissioner Fletcher asked if they could take action on the abandonment of these two easements and let staff work with them on the other issue of the other trail. Chairman Munoz confirmed that the City will only abandon the easement if there is another alternative provided to complete the trail. Mr. Flower noted that final action is taken by the City Council and the action of the Commission is to make a recommendation. He said that with respect to the question about the indemnification requirement; standard language was used that is consistent for any application to the City. He said that if the action is challenged and if the applicants want to avoid costs, then they could abandon application. Chairman Munoz clarified that the application is for the vacation of 2 easements and if City deems it necessary to continue north to an existing trail. Commissioner Fletcher stated that these easements have been ignored by everyone and there is not much reason to keep them. He said he favors abandonment. He said there are lots of problems with them and the request should be granted. He said the issue of expense can be hashed out before the Council meeting. Commissioner Oaxaca concurred mostly. He said currently,the easements are largely ignored,and we need to try to fix that; they need to be abandoned. He said with respect to the issues regarding security,we do not want to open a single-lane highway just to control access. He said the residents can maintain their access but not for other full sized vehicles. He said with respect to the costs,the resolution indicates almost signing a blank check although staff assures that it will likely be less. He said he would like to see an intermediate step/lower amount until we get a more concrete estimate to present to the residents. He said he agrees with Mr. Flower in that the City is giving up property rights and so it is reasonable to expect a partnership. He said he would like to see a reasonable estimate for the residents. Vice Chairman Howdyshell also concurred regarding the abandonment request. She said security is key and agreed that a reasonable estimate is needed. Chairman Munoz said ditto to all. He said he is concerned about the costs to the residents. He agreed with Commissioner Oaxaca regarding the quid pro quo about property rights of the City. He said he is also a member of the Trails Advisory Committee and they represent a large segment of the community. He said equestrians expect access through these trails. He said he did not know that closing the trail down would make the resdients any safer. He said kids are always going up streets and into the canyons. He said the property owners will be dependent on their neighbors and police to help police this. He said he is concerned about their costs and agreed that perhaps they could direct staff to look at interim measures to get a better estimate. He said he fully supports the abandonment request. James Troyer, Planning Director said that the ten thousand dollar figure can be lowered in the resolution, but the Flood Control District costs could be more and if that happens,the project would stop until we got more money on deposit. Chairman Munoz said that once we are in negotiations with Flood Control, the outcome could exceed that amount. Mr. Flower said that if it is lowered to five thousand dollars and then work begins, and the money is exhausted, then the condition of approval would not be met, but ultimately the trail would not be vacated. He said the City could pick up the rest of the costs, but there is no guarantee that the City will have funds for this. Planning Commission Minutes -8- November 10, 2010 P281 Vice Chairman Howdyshell said it is perplexing, as she does not want to give them a blank check. Commissioner Oaxaca said the homeowners need this to make economic sense. Commissioner Oaxaca said the homeowners would oppose this if the cost is excessive. He said he would like a two step process and ask the City to identify costs to at least cover staffs costs to develop plans for the Flood Control District and then the residents can decide to proceed if the costs are beyond that. Mr. Flower noted that this application complies with the Trail Implementation Plan. He said the plan directed them to first take this to the TAC and then have a public hearing with a recommendation for the Council. He said the Commission can continue the item and ask staff to work on it towards a possible solution. He said there is no time trigger, and no deadline. Chairman Munoz asked if staff needs this recommendation before starting the process or can it be done in lieu of the recommendation to Council. Mr. James said that funding is tight, and this project would not be from general funds. He said the Capital Improvement design group looked at it and they came up with the ten thousand dollar deposit figure. He said he can't authorize funds for staff to do this project without City Council approval. He noted that the Trails Committee meets on the priority level of their projects. He said they could lower the figure, but if it is more then we would have to go back to the residents for more. Chairman Munoz asked it would be feasible to give staff an amount just for staff to look at this. Mr. Flower questioned that it would not meet the condition if that occurred. Mr. James said he did not know what the cost of the permit is but he could arrange for a meeting with the Capital Improvements section head before they make the deposit. He said the intent of the dollar value is to get a realistic commitment from the property owners. Commissioner Fletcher said the trail improvements are basically in exchange for the easements. He asked about the encroaching utilities on the existing easements. Mr. James noted that some of the utilities appear to be on the public parkway along the curb. Chairman Munoz reopened the public hearing. Vice Chairman Howdyshell asked if there are funds on deposit, they would need to know what the residents are willing to do. She said they would need a collective decision. Mr.Troyer advised the item be continued to the December 8,2010 meeting date because there are too many unresolved issues to go to Council. He suggested we work with the residents and Engineering and contact the Flood Control District regarding their costs. Commissioner Fletcher noted that he did not hear if the residents are concerned about opening the north end of the trail. He said they may still want to block community access to south side. He asked if they could consider a lower dollar amount. Mr. Troyer said that will be part of staff's review. Chairman Munoz concurred and said he wants staff to consider the equestrian community and they need to weigh in. Motion: Moved by Oaxaca,seconded by Fletcher,to continue the item for the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 to the December 8, 2010 meeting (4-0-1). Motion carried by the following vote: Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 10, 2010 P282 AYES: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: NONE ABSENT: W IMBERLY -carried G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE T ACT MAP SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMI KHAN - A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Lo (L)Residential District located about 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of W' chester Court-APNs: 0201-182-36,- 37,and-38. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative eclaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff r ort. He said no comments were received regarding the noticing of the project. Chairman Munoz asked about the mitigations for st. Mr. Smith said that every project this size requir mitigations for dust. Chairman Munoz invited the applicant to com ent. Kevin Richer, 2313 E Philadelphia, Ont o, said he represents theapplicant, they have no objections, and they agree to the conditi Chairman Munoz opened the public h ring. Vartan Petrosian, 15285 Jerome Avg Fontana,said he owns property to the north of this project and he was not aware of this prop,sal until recently. He said this project would only allow him to develop 3 lots instead of 4. He a d if there is anyway this project can be pushed to south to allow him to have 4 lots. Commissioner Fletcher aske 'how this tract specifically affects him. Mr. Petrosian said he is sh , about 10-15 feet. He said when he bought the property he was told he could get 4 lots out of ' and the layout of this project prevents that. He said he thought that where one street ended am the opposite side of the road,a new street would begin on his side of the road and therefore he t - ught he could configure 4 lots. He referenced an overhead map of the area. Mr. Richer stated th he did meet with Mr. Petrosian and they came up with a configuration that allowed for two accs points. He said his lot may have enough square footage but there are other factors that woul come into play. He said they only came up with 3 lots. He said Mr. Amin might look at a lot line j justment, but it may take more than the 20 feet noted by Mr. Petrosian. He said they might need,y30-40 feet and that might affect their own project setbacks. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, said it is purely a matter between these parties. He said there are no, rounds to continue this application at this point even if the Planning Commission finds a suitable subdivision as his objection is outside of this review of this application before the Commission. James;'Troyer, Planning Director, agreed that it is a moot point. Mr. Flower added that an approval of the project does not preclude them from negotiating. Planning Commission Minutes -10- November 10, 2010 P283 STAFF REPORT PLkNNING DEPARTMENT DATE: November 10, 2010 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a Local Feeder Trail that lead from the trail between residences onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 (Class 5 exemption - Minor Alterations In Land Use Limitations). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor, Flood Control South - Single-Family Homes, Very Low Residential East - Southern California Edison Corridor, Very Low Residential West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor, Flood Control B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor South - Very Low Residential East - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor West - Flood Control/ Utility Corridor C. Site Characteristics: The local equestrian trail is at the far northwestern section of the City and runs north and south between the Cucamonga Channel and a tract of houses that front Ranch Gate Road. There are two legs of the trail that spur off between three residences. One portion of the trail is entirely along the south property line at 5340 Ranch Gate Road, and the other portion is split between the two properties at 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road. Both legs of the trail over the years have been fenced in. The trail that runs north and south currently dead ends at the flood control corridor at the north end. The south end of the trail is open at the corner of Hillside Road and Ranch Gate Road. ANALYSIS: A. General: Tract 9426 was originally recorded in 1978 and the housing product was also reviewed by the County of San Bernardino at that time. The tract contains 16 lots with single-family residences. The tract of houses is between an Edison Corridor and the Cucamonga Channel. Ranch Gate Road is a north to south traveled local street. The tract was developed with a 15-foot equestrian trail easement that runs along the rear of the �y properties adjacent to Cucamonga Channel. This trail has two 15-foot legs of the equestrian EXHIBIT C P284 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848 — RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT November 10, 2010 Page trail easement that extend out to Ranch Gate Road so the trail does not dead end at the flood control corridor that is fenced off at the north end of the trail. One leg runs entirely on the south property line of Lot 10 (5340 Ranch Gate Road). This leg is located at approximately the halfway mark of the subdivision. The second leg runs between Lots 15 and 16 with 7 feet 6 inches of the easement on each lot for a 15-foot total easement width. This leg was at the north end of the trail so that riders could get back to the street without having to turn around. Over the past 30 years, the two legs have been fenced in and do not provide access for trail users or equestrian riders. The trail easement along the south property line of the resident at 5340 Ranch Gate Road has been closed off and improved with concrete paving and wrought iron gates at the front and a fence at the rear. Photos have been provided that demonstrate this easement runs within inches of the foundation of the house and that the resident's air conditioning unit is located within the easement. The residents would have difficulty securing their yard if this easement were to remain. The trail easement shared between the residences at 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road over the years has been closed off with chain link gates on one half of the easement (7 feet 6 inches), and pilasters with wrought iron on the remaining half (7 feet 6 inches). This trail runs within 6 feet of the houses. Engineering has applied conditions to the project and has been working with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to enable the trail to continue at the north end of the trail, through the flood control corridor and out onto Turquoise Avenue as requested by the Trails Advisory Committee. B. Trails Advisory Committee: The Committee (Howdyshell, Munoz, Ryerson, Oaxaca, Tisler, Henderson, and Douglass) reviewed the site plan and photos of the site on January 13, 2010, and recommended that the applicant be required to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step through for pedestrian and equestrian access. The Committee was in support of abandonment as long as it did not dead end at the flood control corridor. The Trails Implementation Plan that was adopted by Resolution 91-262 provides guidance for the vacation of trails. This trail was established under Tract Map 9426 that was approved under the County of San Bernardino. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because this project meets all the criteria described in the section and is only an abandonment of portions of an equestrian trail easement. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within Tract 9426. P285 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2009-00848 — RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT November 10, 2010 Page RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, James/R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Tract Map 9426 Exhibit B - Photos of 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road Exhibit C - Photos of 5340 Ranch Gate Road Exhibit D - Aerial Map Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 Draft Resolution of Approval for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 for City Council SCA Lfi 1"0100' SHEET 2 of 2 SHEER 286 T R ACT N"0 94-26 d) IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, OAUFOKN/q BEINB 4 SUBOIVI6IDN OF A PORnUH aF LAT6 10,11,AND Q� AS BLOCK fy.°mm C,(A.Owoa,HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATIOH P rgsr e M A9 R[GORDED IN AOOS G, fiBf 40,>AN fSRNARDINO C1P!3>Hy GDUM(Y RfLO ROS 3> 3> _ - IMMMON,CIeVIL EgGI EER ^e N_„NE„ APRIL,197 N/f'ff•T D'E.I f,l',I'!. ..,it 492.9 _ 1 6Ju _ w6RS 4' xiV.: _. ...-.'—� _ I� f3n4=w-�'P tfF✓e . _ lry N 25./lR Rt lq/l/l �nm u� I • �N I il9 �Na 5)tCe ,.. 7-w6o1,1V xWO �.�En N•/M TNOROEO P I I :. P +P%n.,�qm a a•..ls 1 ^N reoE 4 L. .�Ot _ Nn__nn'*—°•c ..._.___..__ .. eves.of i Cl�l 'aP ON.s'PER _ 3 ,°.» -". •Se.C.F.CO. IM urRECUOEO S!��.�1I � s..e I �• /'fR OR 912t,/,1/ _ _ 1533GOl Ys� !✓ /'f'* Y Co - j b f• ' 4M1 Ne /� 33 H O i96.s � a 9' I LI N i.blro �,.Y 12 SCALE t 'I r tet AI 11 4x3 t;11 10 nua'33 n a .� Sa 5 11 :. - N.,•,I=Iti I � TR66EU•R2E t�� a � CURVE DATA - • L T �;N o.si 3 , � 2'e0 16' 2000.00 9324 qi.b5 NOTES: ^fN 81 c 8, I 3 A�.' Q s>•oc' so xao ae.l° zG"o `I`�O 1•pl 5!+• 50.00 ilG I.>B I. • I-MAJES FOUND MONVM NT TLGGED"RCE 1195"PER N K I5/T,0[AS NeTED •° 1 ",I"R. 4 -n O 751•01 IO• SO.Op l03 00 2,O INO:(AT'L SET 14•I_P T"GED'RCE 11188','4•BELOW y� 3 'it,1° I —© ld 10 0;' d.00 SI.10 33."i IAVLD SURFACE 14 PAVED AREAS. ' ,j e r REOROOO STAKES 14'dNG PAINTED(ED)SET AT ALL iI 1•sf 21 Y,DO .,.ft A.s. [FAR LOT CORNERS ANO TAGGED•RCE IIIBB;SET LEAD 113•S1 11• 165'00 61.51 30.b AND 1A6 IN(OP OF CURB ON FRJNi PPLJKTION IF ALL LOT LINES. ,i y J� a rt152'f111 `---- 4.11115 TRACT NAS IG LOTS 5 TAE BEARING5 SHOWN NL[LGN:�'.'S4SED UPON THE OF HILLSIOE ROAD BE1He"N.85-M ICE-AS _ _=5•_I_. �°% �R, j SNOWµON 74.8608,M.B.IU/1-9 y • i>{'1° 1 O� [L, L) J,.a i� G.B5.L.DENOTES BUILDING SETBACK LINE,SNONN TwuS {�M'" 1•J±] '� 2 ®'� /� 1.A SOILS REPORT WAS PREPARED By RICHARD MIUS AYLC1— J _" l \ u. I•IeS ICE. DAIEI)4EPF 15,H1L,5GNED DY E.DIANE LWRCE 24811 t''4. B C.S.P.B.DENOTES COUNTY$URVEy0R5 FIELD D00 K. 7.CS,M. oENOTES CO/NTy SURVEYORS MONUMEAT Io.I.ei i IS uoT A.I{u�LBING SITE �\ '`,j I m I I t0 \l Co P LJ \ O V 1^ G f•/I lgG6f0"RG E.f2aB• I �VN .;.,. � r5 Nef i.tl"r 3s,.es N. sr,eNL./LLes/DE ROII D t,I EXHIBIT A - ��I�o1► P287 RESOLUTION NO. 12-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848, A REQUEST TO ABANDON TWO PORTIONS OF A LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL THAT LEADS FROM THE TRAIL BETWEEN RESIDENCES ONTO RANCH GATE ROAD IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT. THE TWO PORTIONS OF TRAIL ARE BETWEEN 5272 AND 5278 RANCH GATE ROAD AND ONE COMPLETELY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5340 RANCH GATE ROAD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF-APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03; 1061-031-04. A. Recitals. 1. David Fajardo, on behalf of the property owners in Tract 9426, filed an application for Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Trail Abandonment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of November, 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2009-00848 and continued the application to allow staff time to obtain more information on the requirements and costs of the trail vacation. 3. On the 22nd day August, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2009-00848 and issued Resolution No. 12-39, recommending the City Council approve the above listed application. 4. On the 19th day of December 2012, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on this application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on December 19, 2012, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The sites are located within the Very Low Residential District near the northwest corner of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. One section of the private local equestrian trail is along the south property line of the property at 5340 Ranch Gate Road, and the second section is split down the middle of the property line between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road; and b. The Trails Implementation Plan that was adopted by Resolution 91-262 provides guidance for the vacation of trails. This trail was established under Tract Map 9426 which was approved under the County of San Bernardino; and P288 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 12-197 DRC2009-00848— RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT December 19, 2012 Page 2 C. The project site is currently zoned Very Low Residential and is bound on the north and west side by the flood control corridor; on the south by single-family residences; and the Southern California Edison corridor to the east. The trail at the rear of the properties will be required to connect to the flood control corridor to provide continuous access to the trail system. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed local trail abandonment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for the logical development of the surrounding area by vacating the two spurs that run through the residence yards and requiring that the trail be redirected through the flood control corridor in the future; and b. The proposed trail abandonment will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because they have been closed off for many years, and the requirement to connect the remaining trail to the flood control corridor in the future will connect this trail a regional multi-purpose trail. This requirement also satisfies the General Design Guidelines in the Development Code which requests that the local feeder trails provide public access to regional trails within subdivisions; and C. The proposed trail abandonment is in conformance with the General Plan and Development Code as it provides access to the regional trails by connecting the local trail to the regional multi-purpose trail. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305 Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations because the applicant is only abandoning two portions of a trail. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4, above, this City Council hereby approves Trail Abandonment DRC2009-00848 by adoption of this Resolution subject to each of the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1) Approval is for the abandonment of two portions of the local equestrian trail easement upon completion of all conditions. One section is located entirely on the property located at 5340 Ranch Gate Road along the south property line, and the second section is split along the property line between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road. 2) The property owners shall be responsible for working with a title officer to process the paper work necessary for the County Recorder to remove the easement from their property title. P289 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 12-197 DRC2009-00848— RANCH GATE TRAIL ABANDONMENT December 19, 2012 Page 3 3) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers, or employees, for any court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4) A recorded copy of the easement vacation(s)shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department. 5) The trail at the rear of the properties shall be graded and maintained in a usable condition per the Trail Implementation Plan design standards for local trails. 6) All documents shall be reviewed by the Planning Department and the Engineering Services Department prior to submittal to the Title Company or County Recorders office. 7) The applicant shall be required to pay the following fee: Notice of Exemption - $50. 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. air 0 0 E 00 00 C. 0 0 V V i 14 c9 c:N 0 U 0 ct -< 0 rm:4 •—, ct E--+ torte r - _: _ r.r \4-1 \ A 0 Cl..) O • ct o Ci C 5 r-9 tg o v O r� o • I■i a� • 14 willmi r:4 rid ct Cr H � as•a cu c:Li-1-1 < ;-I i Ct U o 0 0 P4 o o Cd • • • • , 44,0Ati - , -4 . Ca . • • . 4, ...• . ,,.. ., ... . . i 1' . _4111111111111 • , ,e._ - . . ; fpreigt—,.,74 Li' I ,4 a 1..1 , . _ •...., , eo. AM. .1. . • tilt t_ io,4 ,,,... ..._. L. ab-- . , -Cti• -' r ' 'id tr.'. r -' • I )4 'f!1 % / ■' i -1 `. , • mi• ..1 - _ . , .., r-T ,, -•111 -.. .,r -;:i•-• 4 •■• ' , • s.b.: . la t"1•,' t 0 :.1 -- (i . ,,, - .....•i , • ..A. i ...dk_-• ... ... ' . 7 ,,.}7-fik .---f--• . . -..:._._. gi, . _ ...,.. 11,, .... w .. . .--,. - , \ It a '. .N 4"1.4.:. .. . ',, 4 '• I 1., Vo. .:, § . . i - • Tymm __ . ?_ .4c: . AL Jr.... ..,.„,....-A • 3111-1, a ... . . ,..,.. _...._ 1 ui.loi.):'i.'.. ,.t • . .•5r, , 4 1 . ..- . . ....,,,,,„.,... •--'-' t . • . !! • . .....',0 '...v+Inklif'•-, ...„ ..,....,._...„..., „. . , 11 • . ■ ..... .....1.........................pti, ,--j1 17.-,1''''...”' .... . . -11rfil‘ ,t'. -, g.!, •- in. ' 7_ "J • p... .• L.,• „.,.„„ .,• ,.. . . . ,.,. . V. , 0 ; i . . 4 4 1 ".: .'1144 .... •.;•_, I ..,•••%. ' l''' ., nit . 114, - i- . . -UK. - • . •,-,,,,.. — 1-- •. r 11 • .. ., , ...- ,-,.-. - )0-- . . • .14 r•-•.' '-i ii --r., . • , ...,,,„--14,,,,„ - • •• ... -7- - - --- _ • .... • , ... . . .. , - --• ., i.' - .. '' . ' , • . - . • • , • ..,.. - :-,. , .... :....4.:1, • .. • . .-,. 1 • . • .._ 1.0,;,:4„, ,...,,..._.. 4,... .; •.. In.. • C, . . • _. :I. I .4 ,a• ...• • ..■, ' I ... 1 . . - . • • • 'i ' v. . . ' . • . . ., ••••rn t„ . , . y •,-;:eg Alii '..11. ,. I,'- ,, . . r •• . •• - '.. . •..1 . 17 1 ,--• .,..,,....... .. : . „ ,, ' '''-'•-...-_, .. *:- w .. . .. :. '; ,; . - - ,..!. .. ... '. -5.„-i-',,iii: L" .• .- ,.0 , '37,.?• • ' ;105. - - . ) .• ..)-.4.•• . .. -.. - -'4*,.."'"-''. .4,7= -- " . — ,. .-0 ."?-, • ;... , , ,,;('-';'- - -- •_No. . .:. ..,, ,,_ , .i•- i• rf,e•-"..-..}.'''-` '.z ,:- • — - • le - . : •• '-4'...-r! ...-it It. I` •.,,-.-• . -- •1.4pil-..:: To': -.•• - -..1, ...i.i „C.t, '.: - - t:,1. A ' •m ''- .,irs.4? •..,.- ''' : ::. v.,. 1 • -- -z . . ....--. .-,....-: i, ,c-... •,, . . . ... - . • • ,-...A.:„.. .„. - „, • •- .:,.i.e- .44. mum AL ' \ \ air 01 0 - . 1-0 o N O Cl)��,, JD vi Cl) CD 0 a) • O oo tnE � I 0 0 Ct 'S r . , . 5 cal ./ � 0 ` 0 • • '� .'"'4 /4 gct4-4Pct tto O E—+ L� a.) C `O O y 0 P4 cNi . 0 g >1 • 1-• wia) - e 0 tta Ct M U U '4_a U - • 4. t ; -4. 7 • �r\\, \1 • 1 : 1 1 , 511\'jil ' e 1 ' , 0 t II! -IV= i;I h . 1 111 1 1 se-vio..,E! a Af 11 SS 6 Hi :"1"1"ii 6-L/',ZI I tt : I I A I , °• SIN 4309R U.1.11 ...1;1 ! . 1 \ r!) i . . ...121 Ai I — beeeeke i I N'3 L' I • .44 ! ' L—Lwile ge 1 fre 1 CS 1 ZS 1 i ...4. Z '. • . - I 0 4...... . A' • N ''''' r..K■ 'La ; kji ,..)i j i ii .. '• ' ()I A; ! I b 1 iti; of • ' I I: '• • Z li; '- k. . 11 .,74 I , k st ' ! ' - --- — 4. ‘ ', ',' (IL '-: .. ''':.:111-- ,_ . .. i■ f 'k, \ i -,... ,imfliolimPw_.; . _ , ,-,.........—::t„ _ • .0--._...rift- 4,• '.-II--. ■- 11/. ir+1 el.:4-..:1—;..1.--....:::;-.1.111‘1.I.. .___,:, ..''.----e._ .7::::' '1...,..:H::..;.1:.;i.•.....::::7---:11..ill".III;-;":1 1 1,141 Ili:ill":ik.I.:: /— i ..'" i ' 1 ! ; ill .. , , illi i 1 tile d ' ii il lil 1 efailili MO: 1 • • II il ?If 1 • . _ rtili111 4' . i . •-..-. illSi - 44 • N , O ' " Z N O .71 N CD O Z r a l ali) i¢ 1 ala .•• C ` C13 al 0 9 ' I V 1 }� Cli) i • fY•!fir -�.-s_ , 7 t.ii, '1 ,y • � C - R y 1 CO 4 '•e IA t' i 1, 4. • • co ri. i I-111 Q N li O �' CNI 9 cv 4 11.1 CL CD ! il. - LL O 4. ]., At 1 ILO Z O ��g a W "� I IL °IltS "1:7 a a . C 7• CO _ O 1._11. LL 1 N o ca o N Il 1 W W O mV •CO O a CN 1 r, . t, • .. t ... • lar) , ... F gi ill. a \ D . 11 1 o { 1a CO CO J- G ° O ,. ■Ill � Z ¢ N �.� I' ", ... IV� W Y w \ ` AL. J ,..,... . , . , . 100 .,, ..3 . ... tip M .. O .,_ . ... .. . .. N ‘tallfli": N Z : CO z I- a W Q ILI w U I ; z w 11. 4 ' ----d Q • : 1 ,. pa 0 '',5-,,,.. �` �ryy y J 1.L. . y� y ''',•:..am $ /?/ ..emu/, I7 a ((//17 '' � i�� ■ E:t.e- .1.. _ z m N O C N lap O �)%° 7 O m 9p p N m g a) i. Q1 o rm °o $ N 1] U C dN 8 2 � = ` bI CI:$ Q 07 r07 U , ' C N 11 Y m U Q O m 1p C Q O O as N 'S f (1119 re uhI 'IIl ,w Cr) A -E_ 0 2 a le. . . . 4,101A C CICli . I CK 1,17, -.. C4 il . • A. • Cn , , 1.0 4 t M r m 'yY `. • ✓ fD C 5, r O O 4t , N pr IV .:� C Q O IY a 4 O • (..-,-..-...., ... ..__ L m L litio____7 . H o o N At. oil , ri,74 1 ----t_t 4 . cad c co r A . ' m nm Am (1) 9 ' T'' - -w. 0 Z a i,•CO Q.) •-•3 �' rJ, (IIIID 0 O . e - c w �• � 1 Q Cu c O = 3 p1 U O c L C _ Ls) g t C CL 0 CZ I: 111.15* CS Iglm 2 ° M � a0 Ru e I� a)8 } 88 Id -. I '. I C n N Y5 rn� I 1 0 oy ,ac Q o f a 1, 1 • a N Z f7 w Etc 6 — U ; Hi L S ct ` ' AIMMV- w d) M O 0 N a' mio w L / .. a5 CO _ N Q Ur 5 E a) o U n •- _ Co 0 W E '> n • o a Q r- r- _' ; Q t r 441. N \ 4istar ,I1 . .4_ • • • Si d) O -c N ' . L V C9- CO O O " CU0N-0 -0 Ecr 'v V) o Q) c E _°O •in _c - -1-0 tiri,O E }, U 06÷a U S 00 � 0C_0 (1) — � � }' c � O � •� ocwm - �moLV) t4) WCWOW n/ O E •c o LL o � � LU c) 0 O N402 cri- g - 200 rpm ; CCo ' a 000 = coL- 0 -a cn • C0QL0L -0 cu a—) i4-. 0 Q) 0 ly - • dilLisai swif C L O O O r cp a N a) co O r E �--+ �'' ? L N N utri . _ I � -D C co a) C 0 -1—• > a) L ca CU Z a) ( n C v O _ 2 C 4) .� O 0)CO v RC U ? a ca X o � C c N t CD E O N a)vi E u) E a) w > C V C V O .c co O O O Q O. •- ,. C 0 0 0 o .g tea r. a: ET O O 0 \\-tit I 'a'^) U) V a) o 2 o cn _Oc faco a cr C `CD > Tim ° c D2 co O - - C a) CO 0 Cam, . ° 2 0 cocoa _. "U =• O `~ nN ° o cm-sco n♦ c _N L � co C 0 L a) U 0 c W " Z a) Cr Q (� o °- oci E corn ��W// ep — O 0 •_ cox, 4_ D -0v0i 0 � N ° - c0 00 0 '' CO 'O °- O a) � a.? = a) 0 0 a) L. N +' ° cow c ° �+ — 4- L a) § o '0 c >+ E2 cc• any a,.gN - O -0 OCO •o O co t CD .0 o N ° = -a U CB a -. — a � >, a 2U a) C N � mC "= O cna) � N "-' �' -0 ° O2 �cctea) �� Q Wa) ca) a) co cncE CO O L m� -' •E flp° Li- -cm c �0- m .= a E I o I- n o f- W 0 N o 0 0 ' ' • r 1 . ,t; COC -c cOjC .0 O N O -L ^♦ N C C co W ppai -p •`' OWN E U O C O 0E N5 is -c6 a) Uw � N0 •cEU) —° OC nC cco o Cr I-L A ca 4--' O N cU `i . o a) 4, cn Ca) 2II 00 w in Q L U 0 rn Uo � � � N � � UO 0 N � � V �, Ct- - U V - 1 V CO CO -E - � -u � a) ON . � cn C O «f ari_e=lI lt o ----A--:: -' acuw0 00E 0 0 � w_ .E t . cno , OUa < ccnnt_ •IW 4t O 0 0 0 i'1 L g y to v "'Ali 1 erifilkt irliilliti illepri I 1 7',; pd 11111111/111 CIO IJII ' I Till/Jill 1. I hiliiiih iiiithlitili 01 Oil i i 1 I I I 1®• ° ®® ; N C iff a .K ---- ....`= .,A.. I 1 lig /Fa I. 1 i 41: . , f • CZ OH glib .,. ....... I .., .._.... ._ ust r____":t -z.‘,.... , 11 F CO : ---1 r-- likof ' . 8 Iw l it 1 1 t .ii F.__ • ' e _ ■ a � t ���� ] 1� Mw\ Mwr. , ___.1 r—J } ....... 1.-- AMP ,__I . Nig i • e BP n. Aa t ■ .W Z Ji I c r_ b. k = - - .e', -7 - ..- --- 4, _ _ 41111• - ,v,t, __, a. '..*-.- 160 Cori C ( & i ...21 ( AMC 00co On -0 � 0N -a +WC L Cl) C 4■.0 CO O O O C -0 V) Co CE > Ual cn On "- v � Q � o ° as o .. p2 c •- O4- Q Um- 0Os � O > a0 xi Tz: _s, -w, c E -a 2 cn " pO � O OVQ�'ffi- 52� � '5OOCO cryin -0 ., U Ho _0 - f -0 0000c L a) 1 •— pcn 0 to -o LtAcu I. ct O0-= NE = pco2s � N `) E _c 1 a) (32 O -0 4) N > -c iii tnco � }' OpToOC ! II11 00 _ .0c o Cy 1 - A-. _ tar N % 4) _ O NE O a N C7Na) O N Cl 'O O c.CO CO N „, v a = +r � i a C ) - '� p . — Q N 'O C N N o -D O _c >+ C E .� O p 'C N N O .co E N p 0 E 'U U E 2E 8c 0) c L mocc O >.+ -'= C E 2 E CO o V � V ° co � 'i O) = L C ._ .0 15 5 E 2 c N. co0' L_ > (aCD t -- :z. � 1 alt. i, tk a, 0 L a . a 00 C CO it CO � o + C o � CO o Co U oo >, N U CC E a) 0 ..c -E. C I a' U 2 c Co 0 C 1..1� c a) co Co Q W L. F- t ca tie ,, ,7 , (-- w -.- _ to-,,,,10 ' - 4.4 \\N-‘77-- ..,.....‘ - _ . 1 tf I / , `� r I 4 t 1 � ,rI 1 • I Ii I . ' . 1 I e co C 0 ' I i• ■ te i I CO a i 0 t t tr i: t f .• 4. ` t\i `� • , {' ���VWW���VWWi . '1/4140111114 ; 71 . . ( likiii P290 STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Sigmund M. Dellhime, Information Services Project Coordinator Subject: APPROVAL OF VARIOUS ACTIONS RELATED TO THE PURCHASE OF ACCELA AUTOMATION FOR LAND MANAGEMENT SERVICES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1. Award and authorize the execution of a lease purchase agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Government Capital Corporation in the amount of $2,120,500 for the purchase of Accela Automation software products and related implementation services, including five (5) years of maintenance and managed hosting services; 2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the lease purchase agreement; 3. Approve an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Accela, Inc. for the implementation of Accela Automation; 4. Authorize annual lease payments of $424,100 for five years, commencing July 10, 2013, subject to annual budget approval; 5. Appropriate $153,600 for implementation services; and 6. Approve an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and AEF Systems Consulting, Inc. (CO.12-119), as a Single Source, in the amount of $245,000 for project management support related to the implementation of Accela Automation. BACKGROUND In 1999, the Building & Safety, Engineering, and Planning Departments began using Tidemark Advantage (Tidemark) for development and permit management. In 2002, Accela, Inc. began acquiring Tidemark and many other competing products (e.g., Sierra, Permits Plus, and Kiva). They also began consolidating ongoing product development and concentrated on their flagship product, Accela Automation. In recent years, the City has begun experiencing a significant decrease in support for Tidemark Advantage, with maintenance limited to necessary regulatory and maintenance updates. Over the past thirteen years, there have been dramatic changes in information technology, with significant enhancements in areas such as web based software, GIS integration, support for mobile devices, executive dashboards, and the opportunity to introduce electronic document submittal, all of which offer more efficient and effective services. Due to the limited enhancement of Tidemark, the City has been unable to avail itself of these services. The P291 DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 2 or 6 opportunity to serve the development community at a higher level, as well as create efficiencies for the city's community development operations is being missed by staying with Tidemark. In response to the Development Review Process Working Group's recommendation to streamline the development review process through the use of technology, an interdepartmental team composed of staff and AEF Systems Consulting, Inc. was formed in early 2011 to review the City's use of Tidemark. The team assessed the City's development and permit service needs, and identified software alternatives to Tidemark. This assessment was based on extensive research, as well as feedback from other agencies, and product demonstrations. Based on this review, the team concluded it was prudent to pursue Tidemark's replacement with a new land management system. OVERVIEW OF ACCELA AUTOMATION It is recommended that Tidemark be replaced with its successor Accela product, Accela Automation. Based on the review of options available in the marketplace, it was evident that Accela Automation represents the best of organization-wide enterprise class applications for land development. Also, Accela Automation offers a simplified migration of existing data from Tidemark, while other enterprise class services require extensive data conversion efforts and costs. Migration to Accela Automation will enable the City to enhance existing operations and streamline processes, expanding services to residents, developers, and other agencies. Benefits include: • The ability for residents and developers to initiate projects, review progress, schedule inspections and communicate with City staff through an enhanced website and mobile devices, such as smart phones and tablet computers; • Greater accuracy and efficiency through introduction of new capabilities, such as GIS mapping integration, project tracking, and eventually electronic plan submittals; • Expediting staff response to requests for information about open projects, permits, inspections, etc, including the ability for contractors and property owners to check their own project status on a 24/7 basis; • Management access to a "dashboard" for tracking metrics on resource allocation, project issues, plan schedules and detailed statistics, improving accountability; • Use of mobile devices by field staff to remotely research property information, verify permit statuses, and quickly update project and/or inspection records; • Integration with the Fire District's activities. For the first time, the Fire District will be a user of the shared land management system, creating a single shared database of complete property information for use: • In Fire Prevention inspection, weed abatement enforcement, and related occupancy activities • By suppression personnel in the field at the fire scene enabling access to detailed property data including the storage of hazardous materials. When the new Accela Automation system goes live in April 2014, the stage will be set for a pilot project to begin accepting electronic plan submittal. The ability to facilitate electronic plan submittal and plan review was one of the goals identified by the Development Review Process Working Group, and represents the future for development processing. It is still a very new functionality that is not extensively used in California at this time; however, this is quickly changing. The move to P292 DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 3 DF 6 Accela Automation is the key first step in making electronic plan submittal a reality in Rancho Cucamonga. ACQUISITION AND IMPLEMENTATION Staff evaluated having Accela provide managed services through the hosting of the software on its site, otherwise known as the "Cloud", and recommends having Accela provide hosting services. This will expedite implementation, shift hardware and maintenance activities to Accela, and will free valuable internal hardware and Information Services staff for use in supporting existing enterprise- wide technologies. Staff evaluated the purchase of the Accela Automation software and services versus a lease purchase. Staff recommends a five-year capital lease via Accela's Financial Services program underwritten by Government Capital Corporation, which offers the following benefits: • Competitive annual interest rate of 1.44% which is equal to or greater than the average return on most of the City's investments • No administrative costs for lease • Spreads payments in equal annual installments over five years, deferring the initial payment until July 2013 The project will begin in January 2013 and will take fourteen (14) months to complete. The extensive scope of the project requires participation of a Project Team comprised of staff representing six (6) departments, contract project management and technical resources, and Accela. To guide the multi-departmental efforts necessary for timely project completion, the City will need external project management support. AEF Systems Consulting, Inc. (AEF) has extensive knowledge of the City's development and permit management processes including providing project management support during the original implementation of Tidemark in 1999. AEF further provided project management support during subsequent Tidemark modification. AEF also assisted staff in reviewing the current status of Tidemark Advantage and prepared an assessment of the City's permit and inspection requirements. Given existing staffing constraints, AEF will provide the following support to the Project Team during the implementation project: • Development of an overall project plan, in concert with Accela; • Management of key project activities to ensure both the vendor as well as City staff are performing required activities; • Coordinate and lead the department team members in assessing and implementing Accela to meet their needs; • Review of all key deliverables and coordination of all revisions required; • Participation in key design meetings with City staff and Accela; • Testing of the Accela system as necessary in support of City testing activities; • Communication with the core management team to review issues and project status; and P293 DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 4 Or 6 ■ Participation in the rollout to the public of the new features of the Accela system that impact them (e.g., Citizen Access and electronic document submittals). FUNDING THE PROJECT Total project costs for the first six years, starting with Fiscal Year 2012-13, are $3,095,400. Upon approval from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board (see companion agenda item), the Fire District will be funding $928,700 of this project cost as an initial transfer to the City's Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund (Fund 714) for the Fire District's proportionate share of the project. On this same City Council agenda, is proposed updates to various Planning, Building and Safety, Engineering, and Fire District fees, a 4.5% technology fee; will be applied to all City and Fire District permit and inspection activities and will be used to recover some of the initial 6-year costs of this project, and create an ongoing funding source for the replacement of this system in the future. An initial appropriation of $153,600 is needed in the current FY 2012-13 budget for implementation services to begin implementation of the Accela Automation project. These funds will be appropriated from the Computer Equipment/Technology Replacement Fund Reserves and into account number 1714001-5300 as detailed below: • $70,000 project management contract support • $33,600 Accela travel expense reimbursements • $50,000 for Information Technology contract staff Funding for project related expenses for subsequent fiscal years will be requested as part of the City's future budget requests. P294 DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 5 OF 6 The following is a summary of the project costs and funding over six years: City Costs Total 6- FY year Description 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16117 FY 17/18 Costs Training $6,300 $6,300 Software $10,900 $10,900 Computer peripherals $5,600 $5,600 Computer Equipment $90,900 $90,900 Cellular Data Service $16,500 $18,100 $20,000 $21,900 $24,100 $100,600 Contract Services, Maintenance, Professional Services $107,500 $325,300 $35,000 $467,800 Lease Payment $296,900 $296,900 $296,900 $296,900 $296,900 $1,484,500 City Gross Cost $107,500 $752,400 $350,000 $316,900 $318,800 $321,000 $2,166,500 Estimated Tech Fee Revenue as of FY13-14 -$49,400 -$148,400 -$148,400 -$148,400 -$148,400 -$148,400 -$791,400 City Net Cost $58,100 $604,000 $201,600 $168,500 $170,400 $172,600 $1,375,200 P295 DECEMBER 19,2012 PAGE 6 or 6 Fire District Costs and initial transfer to Cit Total 6-year Description Costs Training $2,700 Software $4,700 Computer peripherals $2,400 Computer Equipment $39,000 Cellular Data Service $43,300 Contract Services, Maintenance, Professional Services $200,600 Lease Payment $636,000 Fire District Gross Cost $928,700 Tech Fee Revenue -$159,400 Fire District Net Cost $ Respectfully submitted, Ut Jeff Bloom, Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Community Development P296 Staff Report RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 C;UCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Sigmund M. Dellhime, Information Services Project Coordinator Subject: AUTHORIZE THE APPROPRIATION FROM FIRE PROTECTION CAPITAL FUND RESERVES IN THE AMOUNT OF $928,700 INTO ACCOUNT NUMBER 3288501-9714 (TRANSFER OUT-COMPUTER EQUIPMENT/TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND) TO PREFUND THE FIRE DISTRICT'S SHARE OF THE ACCELA AUTOMATION PROJECT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Board appropriate $928,700 from Fire Reserves into Account 3288501-9714 and transfer these funds to the City's Computer Equipment /Technology Replacement Fund 1714001 for the implementation of Accela Automation inspection and permitting services. BACKGROUND This is a companion item to the City staff report, where detailed background information is available, requesting approval of various actions related to the purchase of Accela Automation. Staff is recommending migration from Tidemark Advantage to Accela Automation. The Fire District portion of the project is being funded by the former Fire RDA reserves, a portion of which was specifically set aside for technology enhancements. Approval is requested to appropriate $928,700 and transfer all project related funding to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Computer Equipment Technology Replacement Fund as noted below: Total 6-year Description Costs Account Numbers Training $2,700 1714001-5102 Software $4,700 1714001-5152 Computer peripherals $2,400 1714001-5200 Computer Equipment $39,000 1714001-5215 Cellular Data Service $43,300 1714001-5220 Contract Services, Maintenance, Professional Services $200,600 1714001-5300 Lease Payment $636,000 1714001-5702 Fire District Gross Costs $928,700 Respectfully submitte , Mike Bell, Fire hief P297 STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: December 19, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chi Mark Steuer, Directo of Engineer Se icey�� Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Director Mike Newcombe, Chief of Police By: Mike Bell, Fire Chief Subject: 2012 Cucamonga Canyon Report Recommendation Authorize staff to complete signage improvements delineating parking and access restrictions in the Cucamonga Canyon area while examining options for implementing additional parking restrictions including the feasibility of a metered parking system and expansion of permit parking districts in the area. Background This report is a summary of access enforcement activities undertaken by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and the City Rancho Cucamonga Engineering and Public Works Department during the past summer in the area of Cucamonga Canyon in the northwest portion of Rancho Cucamonga. It also contains recommendations for enhancing the enforcement efforts in 2013. After several years and many lower level attempts to curb neighborhood quality of life impacts caused by the large numbers of people accessing the various water features of Cucamonga Canyon it was evident that more aggressive measures were necessary to reduce those negative impacts. Following several months of planning, consulting with the City Council and many neighborhood meetings, a plan was developed and implemented that included reduced parking spaces, improved signage, social network outreach and most significantly an increased enforcement of trespassing regulations. This plan was initiated over Memorial Day weekend and concluded with the Labor Day weekend. The first couple of weekends were primarily used to educate the public about the proper route in and out of the Canyon and to redirect them from unauthorized paths onto this route. RCPD deputies used off road vehicles and equestrian patrols to access areas on private property that much of the public had previously used to access the canyon. They began issuing citations after the first couple of weeks of the effort. Residents in the Crestview neighborhood reported a slight improvement in foot traffic and problems in their area, while also noting that as soon as the police left people quickly reverted to old behaviors. Residents south of Almond on Henry and Bella Vista noted increased parking in their neighborhood. They requested and successfully implemented a permit parking district with the assistance of the P298 2012 CUCAMONGA CANYON RF-PORT PAGE 2 DECEMBER 19,2012 Engineering and Public Works Departments which improved that situation. Canyon visitors began parking on Sapphire south of Almond. There were times when over 100 vehicles were parked in the area with hundreds of people trekking into the canyon. RCFD units had fewer rescues this past summer with no incidents resulting in major injuries. Working in conjunction with the Sheriff's Air Rescue helicopter, RCFD units conducted six (6) rescue operations in the Canyon this season. On several busy weekends RCFD crews used off road vehicles to transport slightly injured or exhausted hikers out of the Canyon. Many of these may have resulted in more serious incidents had it not been for the extra patrols and the capability of a new utility vehicle put in service by the RCFD earlier this year. Residents in the impacted areas continued to provide feedback and input for improvements throughout the summer. RCPD and RCFD communicated with these residents regularly and have implemented some of their suggestions. At the conclusion of the summer season staff took many of the residents suggestions, further surveyed the area and will be including several of the resulting ideas into this ongoing effort. Below are some of the patrol statistics from RCPD as well as suggestions and recommendations under consideration to improve the public's awareness of the proper access into and out of the Canyon area. This report concludes with some general observations about the long term approach to this matter. RC Citizen Patrol Dates Total Cites Warnings Cites RC Citizen Warning Arrests Parking May 26-28, 2012 212 142 8 14 1 21 June 2-3, 2012 161 53 13 11 2 13 June 9-10, 2012 101 10 8 1 2 4 June 16-17, 2012 92 3 6 0 1 10 June 23-24, 2012 79 9 10 6 3 26 June 26, 2012 96 4 4 0 0 3 July 23, 2012 65 0 8 0 4 5 July 28, 2012 104 19 9 1 4 1 August 12, 2012 77 6 7 2 3 2 August 20, 2012 73 2 6 0 0 0 August 27, 2012 53 0 1 5 1 0 0 2 Totals 1113 248 84 35 20 87 P299 2012 CUCAMONGA CANYON R3POR'f' PAGf?3 DECEMBER 19,2012 RCPD units totaled over 560 hours of enforcement activities for this effort. This effort resulted in $39,554 in overtime expenditures. Thus far $30,760 of this expenditure has been recovered through citations issued. It is also worth noting that over 90% of the citations issued did not go to Rancho Cucamonga residents. This fact is consistent with police and fire observations over time, that the majority of people hiking into the canyon, come from outside the City or the immediate surrounding areas. In addition to signage changes made during the summer the following improvements have been suggested and if approved will be completed by Rancho Cucamonga Engineering and Public Works Departments during the off-season. (See attachments for further details). 1. Install a "No Parking" sign on westbound Almond Street just west of Henry Street to extend the no parking area to the east of the narrow section of Almond Street. 2. Install directional "Canyon Access" signs on the north side of Almond Street at Henry Street facing south; northbound Skyline Road north of Almond Street; and northbound at the north end of Skyline Road. 3. Install a "No Canyon Access" sign facing westbound on the west side of Skyline Road at the entrance to the private trail. Observations and additional recommendations going forward: Cucamonga Canyon as a destination cannot, over the long-term, support the large numbers of people that were witnessed accessing the area this summer. Limited parking, neighborhood impacts and the lack of public improvements (bathrooms, trails, trash receptacles etc) preclude the area from being the type of attraction as seen in the Claremont Wilderness Park or the Icehouse Canyon area of Mt. Baldy. Absent a major commitment of planning and resources expended by the San Bernardino National Forest, prospects for this situation improving are extremely remote. The improvements needed, and the space available for those improvements, are in the National Forest area and outside the purview of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Ultimately the United States Forest Service needs to determine the future of Cucamonga Canyon, in conjunction with affected surrounding agencies including the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will have to continually monitor this situation and remain diligent in patrolling the area and enforcing the appropriate access and activity around the adjacent neighborhood. Over time, sustained effort of that type will ultimately reduce the available parking in the area to an amount and timeframe appropriate for the capacity of the Canyon to safely support such activity. City staff will be working to determine what that capacity is during this off-season. An effort to develop a volunteer-based interest group could help alleviate the number of extra patrol hours and expense borne by the RCPD. Such a volunteer group has been developed in other areas with outside entities like the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD) whose mission is to preserve natural areas like Cucamonga Canyon. Staff will continue efforts to try and develop a volunteer-based group over time that could support and augment City efforts in the Canyon. P300 2012 CUCAMONGA CANYON REPORT PAG13 4 DECEMBER 19,2012 Continued public information, neighborhood engagement and social media outreach will be required to successfully address the issue going forward. All of this will need to be a sustained effort supported through a multi-department collaboration that might necessitate a specific resource allocation in future budgets. Dialogue with other agencies (CVWD, USFS, Fish and Game etc) must also continue. Staff is also recommending that the City Council authorize further investigation into the feasibility and logistics of a metered parking solution for the area. This approach is being implemented in the City of Claremont to improve the situation at the Claremont Wilderness Park. Many beach cities use a similar system for small, unattended beach access lots. Recommended elements could include: • Delineated parking limited to 40 vehicles maximum on Almond and Sapphire • Installation of signs and a solar powered parking meter that distributes permits to be displayed on vehicle dashboards. • Hours could be adjusted seasonally • Resident permits could be issued at no charge ✓ Expansion of permit parking restrictions in surrounding neighborhoods Proper control over the available current parking in the neighborhood is, given existing resource limitations, the best ways to manage access into the Canyon and limit impacts on the adjacent neighborhood. Revenue from the parking permits, although limited, can help defray some of the patrol and enforcement costs to the City as noted in the above report. In conclusion, it should be reiterated that managing access into Cucamonga Canyon and the associated neighborhood impacts is a continually evolving process. The current situation did not evolve over night and it will not be resolved over night either. Every year, the City will evaluate the prior season's efforts, impacts, and suggestions received, and make adjustments going forward. Just as the residents who live in the immediate neighborhood have a long-term investment in their property, the City is also committed to the proper long-term management of Cucamonga Canyon within the limits of our legal authority and resources. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell, Fire Chief At J4 c. •• •, = O. • • • • v 2 O foi-:.:• .. i ...t <... .4. * • c4c5co, • I) • ti $::)-11 . . , y ` -;y ,1 7 a s, �� r y a 4 � 1R A ):3 + T V' --.,-,l,•-i,t'-" ‘;•'-;•--"-' >1..1 ' 1 .or* ..-; . 4 �+ , 1 y Ct 4 LIO) .•11.'''', .1 ,4,4. •-..,,,,it9-' 1 i f • (1:24) :.....,,'. ',V' . } r o E '11 • ' I, j N..:.,-.,..,-...41 _ ,. 7. . . .. ,.... 4001,.„.....;,,; .....,,* .. V . U • • 2 ;zs. , ---) • ,.,-... o c 4\--\--.... _ • ; hi „ , 0 . ,,,,.... 2 2 I 1 OE. ...■.-. • < 74 • c 4:t....._, 1 i I 'c";f. 1 I 1 i g eeirs.":"--(--k„. E3 6) Ca) 0 c1 S 171 0 S ezi F.: ..t- 2:2.7117-7*.' 1a. > do 1 <,b .- ' ,... 0 > 0 C 0 T. al C.) ri g }-.1 ) , 44-4' ......... ..., • D2, (7, Ei (.. , ..... .,.... ,,. ,.. ...,,7 .x.:-.. , . ., Ei, ... • ci % .. ...........- di E (I O E3 0 = o IDT,P lq ii 174 F4 o • .....- ..-•. . • 0 'i I 40, . $7;21 53C:3C (-3 � zz Z w CJ N d C R co O 0 O O no c O 0 o O C N .0 > V E r co 0 ri O j C) O N i. .0 V d >1 0 0 .c c o 0)N E o c 3 3 c � E 0°0 �, m )' r c m O ' 0 C C co V RI N O /7 co 6 co e �� y V -a •p R 'p ccv m F !0 C m m N .0 V N .O .O C v O C > N 0 'O co C O E w 0 0 C t C 0 m = c0 Z � C N p co > -0 — a O. r m cco C> R E c a r o m ? C c '� c aNic c "- � ca O cap o 'o cs- m c °>'o c o .c w m d 3 . L !0 V W N � z. cco 3 c c E esat9 s..63 CO CO 4-1 CO 'o a� m E co a E 'E ;, E m °' 'a E - co 0 U cs c ,_ m O O— in m . m c rn o co m 'o w e c (a v c V O CD V N 3 �.. Y C J p N to co 0 Oh 2O O Q C a O O r N O > m N N m N CI N N w N ` 1m 0 to. &I m `o g 2 E Eti n CD 0' a c. a E ° 0 y E a 7 O m e E 7 0 o co 0 y O < „ t V) 2 v) 0 o 3 co c 0 v< Z3 0 CiU TS Ii v► ca ' .O ca C a ++N !a V 7,c 0 w I o o 2 w Cs as a • w C a 3 •p O C V t cc gt a O c d d i c .� .d+ a O m E O C « co 3 ". O— d t 3 m O a O 7 O m O m V E c V m on-II E E otc C 32 :. , E o a) .ci C c2 0 o R 0 t - E 0 ca co c � t .a .O :a I C an 1 N O 2 m O N a la C. + me Caa as Ea I H > 'G >. G Hi co C H o o -073 �oo E . H ..c. — C c la O V C /% a • 3 Q ' lac 3 a •y ta CO C vi �. m Vac O d c cc . V fi wm ea Z" E rt2 oc V j, 6. tj OO .0 `OC G >' 1" C G r c a C O U. CO a QO N G U 0 0 0 I- N £ N r ( r+ Q •C, N y d C roc r O o E C N E c o . CO ` ` 0 E C CM N > > .0 m R 4 C v >.,OF O 0 co Z •C U. <a 2 .O d QV Ewa. < ( ' .• •"• co • • • • c..) 2 2 , • • . , , z .,„4 3. k V ' . • 460.t ' C..) _•%,.-0.4:-.... i . ..,.. __:.4 r_,,..... ...,_,,,,.r.r..---404-1wmgritintrAto:VO f ■ ir-",'.44:*--.4-4‘11rOlaiiivitill,VI' .. AL,a,. .....•... .. ,I, 1., "Iii Alb Ihir ..- \--1 1 7.(-,-wzrito2t....zwAr,v...mi..;I.;;;%...„:4•1•41.t I V) :A. —.7 V a..) ____., . _.., ...... t , ... MIN P , y ;. . ' ) / ( ' 11 • ql , . .,_ i .. II ,ill • 1 _. .....,. c 1 • . . -.. ,-. . _.• _ . ft 4 . 'I n. I .:.1. . k :' . all) . . U of, i . .' Sirm 1 t 0 0 i . 4 .1( ... .„. ,... I.1.1 _. •, - ,... .. .,. :-, 10 11 1 in ‘ Ova # i1e. / I V) �s iv %1/44411\., All f` M 1. I e . , ., ... : '54 1 • - ,,i i ri:i$j . - . ,off _ 1 k- t i a.) a . , V O , ai. ,. .. • .. ilk._ • r i i .. -1, ' ? . : . 4 * / 441ht 11141114 v. ( . • 4 re, • ..... 0 cd . • z0;, , / 1111'‘'‘-4„,`-'' •. . • • C.) 2 F'. • I. • I 1 Z ,,gt,_1 , ,.), .,..„ • ;, 1 1 , 4;7:',4,.•ti5'. . t IV • • 1:., c.).,„,e . , . livAli__I co) ,:,•,:k u. ''' t, . •,i, '5•17:1--:s- .. I,,•,:fY;r1;:to' ...`.'•. t'_.7=-; # . .',‘ •V v ,ti i it; 114- \ _, , _... i - v....e..--4,:. • ......„ Irv; .r„..,,,.....„. , .... .... , ,.,,...,„.. ._ .. ......_ ,. ,;,,,,,,,,,.:, ,. . '',---i („n ........k ,ii 111.1 Ir. : CU A -. '1 ..,. ."i i:i . . ■ • „,,-flp . -- v. •„-,,, ?* .. ,, 4 • ■ , almm° .. . \,. 41#' :•-:. , • . • MI I , Cli i > ,:?.„. ,,.i4 V' . % ' i....._=';:lz1 •... .e,.1 •■ I 4--) _ - : : 4. , rA- A. ii Li) id ti , I , . . • r ..,0•104 . moo —.:111 11 I t . . ltril,,er ..3..-,•'I 0 *0 •-''' allMij NO . , ' b iiii • .- •,,`) ..:- . -./ 0kg111.57f; "'".n.-1, - 444 .11 1 .-- C • i .,• 111 ' • , - fel)-1151,. aro) ___ ., ..... ., .. . - Ara.., '” ... • rall**"..... -.. . / C 14. •1 <•.• •• . 4 4. 1 ' ' .-0,• - ' , . 1. •IMINE•, ,,,./7/ 401 f -11. (10) 4 •uml■ ••••,,,, -.0 Nap. C • • .1 ( i . , (•110) f• ' / —.7 , •°Pr' ' LW= 11/ • / I t re • . . • 4- ,., 1 0 k____ .• / tr t VI Lill .... 11)-- 111111; . • ...... 0 ..., . . ¢ :d( i't' t•• . .v. � c: 11111: . . , . ..„ s . , il ,A, I , : { • i , ix, j 4 r.1 Pt / AY 1 t•, ..i V W • 1 - 08 v v2° — < < CO ages U U ° o 2 67 �- co CO >>CD U (n h',4 ` � m el m a 0 t0 m 1n r1 N O N N C N el N N CO — i a z ♦+ el N N el m 0 a V m 0 0 0 • N Q . 0 ( to VP .-1 el 0 t0 O O el N O O In C rr rl m C<.•� C 3 N r C u 0 (4 CO m CO W O v CO m n l.o In E c W N • M « ^ , u W CC V 00 N m O m 01 a O O1 4.0 N O CO C N In r1 N N CO 0 E' LI C N N N N N m w Ln N m m m N el t0 0 m N O1 t0 8 N N V1 ., W N N el el V el el el O a+ O N'1 N N N N N N O el N N O N N 0▪3 N N O O O Op N N N N N !� ON M N N 0 l0 rj W N N N ��. N N N Ol C N C N 0 > a H N h F CO R C C -' -1 C = ^ 7 O 7 OP 2 z m m Q Q Q :,- . ..t —1 0 CD I ,.. I , , ••■,:, • • • — c) 444.- • • • 4, Qz o 4r. ■4%• , , < „t ' 4 . • • pug.) .„... .... . ... . . eto bp C,OZ Ili.% Z .-. < S zo pl'a Co) 0 co C.0 0 Cr) CilliCI) • ... c4:-.....- 4' / LIJ 0 < 0 Z 0- 0 .E. .. \ . . :\. - 0 SI.yl r-e.F-211:_ 1111S:'''F'1':I.I'e .51 ......-- __.-- en ca 0 Ca. M C c0 ° ce cr, .‘. . , ,..., F E ___ • Henry St r--- 0 , 1 Z — C/3 he -0 CC c < 0 0- E 0 < z 15 o ci, C,) Et 3 z c.) a ■ < s? g a 0 - a.) 0 c•-) . §1 0 Z > ..._ 1 a CL) W4 cc to 132 r.- i..- o . 0 1 C) = 0 1■■ _f_a, a IMMI,. v) — _ 0 cn - 16C1F- E z z CO 0 CO >- I-I-1 Al Z CD w < (-) (..) •,:t '.i:-.4, , .■ 0 . r z 0 ,,c- I , . .. . :. . )1..C.res.,..elv • 40,r IS -.00...- . . . . ....---. c ..- ...--.- ■7. co • ,....., - ' c OD . ‘... 0 (1) -- LLJ c < Z co I 0 (/) 0 )- I.J.I Z Z 0 1 ,i• E. . C.) < - S — 6 t U •_ x ECD CD o co 4) o v 1 . . .- it' .. ,. lei.... - ._ .,,. ., o . :1 '.. CO ,.,, V al2./8 1-- '. .. _ .. 0 - re- ems 1. ; :t' • C I 1 0S R 6 i z2k < v< U (a N ca a) c a) N c E O N c C .r E C co 0 O . a cn U ca v x 2 .N a) vi ca w v ` moo a) c ° .c> ° > 33 CO co 0 0 l E ° � 2 ca) v, -`°v mg o U ca c ca c c L CD ca ° c v -C C c m > ° c a) 3 CO a) N c ca i< C O U) � CO c •E CO U . E ca a) E > N ° E c = .co c m a) ° � aw ca cu t E U U•_0 F— a) a) a) C •D N Y U L0 /cod 0 o^n' o a) a as y., .0 E °� Na ° ccaa QED ° O W3 �' � v ESC c`aN ca �n `. C.5 w U w a@ ca 0 •> ...'., •;4.7 2) ai I x., i • " • 1 U 2 2 , z -4.• . ,. w u. 1, . 1 .1. L =rr •73 (a r i_3� .,-J E u) '� � n, c K, E0) t."1...4, . O MS ,- I 0 Cl) i, F' �''+' S 1 'N+,\! °: C C (D 1 1$1,0 , , '101.\.t. -----t,', o c -c loitpi.e--v. ..: . , , •_ 03 .„ .,, \ , 0,-,, U " z , U O • r CO O (U E U- - t 0 U t = O , 0z v< z C.3 alga co L cn o_ c O r 0 '+, N N co C V L. - C C c C n W co 0 CO ,® Q L O a +-� U e ` O L V -0 %) L. ki N O - O OC a O co O C 0 t co a) C ` O) D C - •O a �� C O a) (0 . > V L O O L = co A C) Z CO C O O N p C O Y E c O c) > v w a a O wcn O o = . E NO Qo ` CDo u_ 0 Q- a a) U LO co )i r c a O 'O co U C O Q c U v ca a) ca o ,, cv c . . . = 2D QO 1.4 4.00 U •..... L.. CU .3 •,..• . 4 Iii > •.... it... . ,_. 0 CU >-.. CU 0 IN • 141j 1." +Ili rs° ...., .: . ,i ,-. irk • . . v• .._ .... .. n3, . ..., _ •lir ON5 Fo...---_ ,.•- v., •• ..e. C Cli) • .,..• 5, . u E -- (1) ••■• 441.t. 41.111 CI a.• b c I, - S . . .- C CU - . • - . ,. ... • CU .r.-.4 - . •- . ,:‘," r1:1 r13 l.) -4 E 0 c ci) Liu MO a Ito •,,.. ., . _ ___ - , ,•-:-_- „dr ......, -_-_. _,_ . s•:::: • vi • z• .....13c. , 73 M C CLIII , * ,:::Ar' .....i.4•" - -.4•--g--lif.A:"'"‘"er..."- (11113 - .47.r,'tire --''' ':4-`1,1b.±... • =NJ _,..,,- -.461•4Yie, .--:-. '•,,,ciiIP,','PC - XII- - - - -1/,7,4r ,. ..0.•:,4', .... - . - --:4---,, ai , * I .z ti , r,, t ' . f t , V 11 06 ir l t + :lei._ :HD( 11 . , .� , �: � ; '; �= ■ ) t till) Cf) Ct Z • + ., • .. 0.) ■14. 4 • CZ/ • 7i • • s:..-., '7,, , - 111F!' 4•A.' ' —' 4'..I'l • 7.•} • ...V T7i CL4 ..■ t • •'.■.S (1) ligf ,it; C4 Cr; '.....) 117:11:1 • • 3, ,--, ct ',..t., ••■■•• Z . L,,_4 , D CZ .1..144-P • '..- ' CD 11:1 li 4....1 biD 1 7111 1,..) ■4._i e-I , • 0...) . 0 . . .. ,, ... ,, 1 „ , .; ! , \ .. C . ii, . ... , .A ,.— . vel: . .;,... , r-i ,10 . i . , IP. ,4 1■■•4 •■I ) CZ: V CID 4-) , 1, 4 r.......4 0 111 ... ..of. • tt , ':. ,.. . . •T... ' C/21 Ct M Pi* •e -.8i.47".... li '..t.144,' •-:,f tisf) .. R tL • - -4■) A i . . 1.4 , CIO • t a'F........, _ . 1 )4 V.• II .'` .i 00? . _...7„....., ,_ , I , i ,:it , . . Piri 1 ill t:41), • ,Ark • 'Ittr, `',-' 7 . . J 1' h� 4:Liv-P -':.iik ,....- - V COD o V _ 4r. CID ,� -` )4 4_4 0 „--11 • .--1 .-. s . Cit Cf) te 7.} CeiD 7i 1' , 414 .5.4 (.4741 ..i._ —,,,, Cfp o ' "4 . ',. --' 1 rei • CID .1-i CID - C/D d--) O 'b O C • 7-4 .� -I-) • ,'U Ct .i0.i 0 0 o4 .- 1-)r) •-4 I-( ...4b13 . 1-4 Lt 0 • � • ..l V ct 0 a) 0 •4 U O - (10) Q ^ , CP -�Ee• P ;11•11 4m)Coi) 'S pe, �' It L Q Q t t ' p4 i,iti-A cn . 0 2, • . Cs) C .0 w • t r y4 i 111IP . ._ .... . . c. , . ---...... .... , , • . . .4/111spep- . .... _, ..,•.,--r- /•.,', -... _-__! - • ..„.• • my _ .. . - -4111M•111 k 4o- .,;•1... . , .. , si.ki *0,A. .•-:...-.,:t' ..--• • - . . ,.. ..... •• •cr, •,. • - - . ,9%...r I . . C rd : '■' - .- . , P'. 1( '1,..,• .., l'• ,,,,, ,...', . I +.•,•.t•r•;`, );.,' .I; '. .: •1 .;1•'•'•. • • ..,■i litil . 4 -T''. i,„'-'1' ''... '-•••'4". '• .'•1• ' ..'■i, . .:•,T.T:--1,,,'e .-'''-7-":`+'''•-;'''''-1;4; Ct • • "., .14....i 1. '1 1.7"4.",'1,,,..i.'',4:-:,-;:t..-, • • . .,_;.. -4--) - 4 i 1,7.,•,j, , ... :,••••3# .; I A.'l'I., '••••': loify- ! lte,7:,,•-.1.,;:' S'.4-,'•:•, ..`•;i.,''..k0 ;:t"•.;.4.,..':4,.....; . I ,, t , I. i. .. , .. . .,. . , . .., . . , , A . . • ,_ .. . . „ .o• -- t.,.,,, . ,-, _4-4, . ... •, • •, i ifillh czao ke i. . , . . . „ I ...„.4,,,.. . .. U .. . •• , . . • , ., „., • • rt:• .1 , i , . . . , ” • ' '. . *' .s'ti ■ • • P 'W..i..•;■••' • • . i •, .11 , %ow •...- c.•••410,-.• • 46,.',.,--,.---ie . , , . 0/44, . . ,. '1..,,y,... i- -- .• : .iiir,: , iiA; . ',- , . •. 1 .. k , ,mr.: . • . 1 • 4: ,'.• ., 1 1 cn V Of) V ct U -4—) t-4-4 ;_i U 0.4--' a--1 CV "' bfJ �-, C C V r U CA C/D 1. . ' 1_4 iI1 by U i>.(P U1_, V cz_i 4 • • • • C/) R� • "....1. '.•(,••: ilmme -: _ .4 clu._ , .. : ,. . , - t 1t :. 1 f: ,.. .,...„..._:... die '4,.. Tr :, � ■ „¢4 +emu r .:• I t.4--+ "° - 1 1t1 J 1 " " 1 h ° ) r 1.il f CI) 17;1 t C.) 0 0 !It if ', '. 1 N ' . A' . ' "P) c..) C,) 4-4 ° Il l'(2.1131 4,1,1 ,..,.., ,, , . ,,..: . , •... ...... . ..„ ,_._, s. . ,. .,,,,,,„,• ,...• tiP4O ��4 %. 4 • , l Co) •� a 1/ ✓ C/) f V w. . N . 11 zi4 ,4s4pa' . .: li ._, . .. .. ---- . - 4 ,4 ct c.) c f,,,,>, cr.: , ,.,.., ....., wo..„ -4. e • - !,*, 1 :.„. ,., -. .*-.. -.r•l 1. coo ,--1 '4.-. .U , E ,_,,, ,,-,r) b.f.) U 4 p 0 --- , A • • rf:. 1 N o � ri 0 CA o t ' U fr 4-' Cr) bip U U Ct O Q.) U O O rt c� tip O e) •—.4 ,v O :-a Ct lim) 72 P) 4--' t C1] •- e� • • • • - ;•y it c:i• ii ,ti ,¢ fi} -4. 1. �. r - t 11 t g' T e .,x a` ; ik r ;. i 1 1 • - . • • Cl) - ,- ii, • CI( _. ~ • M 7 .{f , • X '7i Q.) Q, p V ccn 4 E _._,, •v O ,� '� V C tr.') .-i r • bf) 4-' '7: Q.) U, C e) V o C� — - ; • o V Q.' �O ° � '� ° ' �`� �•" ( � • Cl) � 'o •' Ct 71 V ' ' U VD � o x c o ' C4-' O .0 Ct ") V d am 4-i 74 0 � U •.. 0 ,� FLU u . u O � L, • • • E c_4._; 0 O A O c v 75 v czi t Ccil V t4 ce,0 o • '-4 P e� ct Li—i 77'J• O P 0 • i i t CID cn Cl) O p C ; 0 be Li O O Qi O ,H o U t o ct U o O C� 4-1 ct Cl) v � o 8 �d O 4-i ci .4-) "cn • E C \' ,r: ,__ E P-, , , 4...., ..� e E - P " '�O p b 0 o O U • • • • • • t: _. O M N. N • :` _I N Om �a' • a G V1 O le , O G V1' v • C le i L J .c•.f. T— _ W . L V s. : , _,: � 0 L da ; _ O V ri3 C L '~ ihip t1 0 °c VI 4p, UN v 0 r9..4.94 P301 STAFF REPORT COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 19, 2012 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING AN APPOINTMENT TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION: To approve the recommendation of the Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation and the City Council Community Services Subcommittee to appoint Tina Chen to serve on the Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation Board of Directors for a four year term. BACKGROUND: As set-out in the Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation's Strategic Plan 2015, expansion of the Foundation's Board of Directors continues to be a priority. Through a Boardmember's efforts Tina Chen, Attorney-at-Law, was recruited. Mrs. Chen submitted her application and then met with staff regarding her interest in joining the Board. The proposed appointment was presented to the Board at their regular meeting held November 14th and they were in unanimous support of Mrs. Chen's appointment. The City Council Community Services Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Michael and Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo, then met on December 5th to discuss the application with staff and concurred as well with the proposed appointment. The Subcommittee will present their full recommendation at the December 19th City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director