HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/07/19 - Agenda Packets.
AGENDA
RANCHO CUCAhOHGA CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, July 19, 1978
I Call to Order by Mayor Frost
2 Plndge of Allegiance to the Flag
3 Roll Cali: Mlkels ✓ , Palombo I/ , Schlosser ✓, West _.�; / Fro:•
4 Approval of Minutes: June 7, 1978; June 21, 1978 lune 22, 1978;June 28, 1978;
July 5, 1978,
5. Announcements
6 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES. %First Reading)
The purpose of this ordinance Is to restrict the parking of motor trucks
exceeding 11 tons gross weight or trailers upon any privately owned
property ii residential zones In the City between the hours of 10:00 p.m.
and 6:00 a m The ordinance ha, been submitted to the Sheriff's Depart-
ment for review.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council Introduce for
first reading ORDINANCE NO 35
ORDINANCE NO 35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCII OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESTRICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES
B All ORDINANCE RESTRICTING PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. (First Peadln
The purpose of this ordinance is to restrict any person from ;arking a
vehicle upon any privately owned property In the City without the consent
of the owner, tenant, or other person entitled to possession of the
property Because of the numerous problems we have encountered with
citizens parking vehicles for sale on various parcels within the City,
it Is the staff's rcco..—.ndatlon that the ordinance be adopted This
ordinance has been reviewed by the Sheriff's Department and approval
Is recommended
RECOMMENDATION: It is recoirnended the; the C;ty Council introduce for
flrast reading ORDINiCE NO 34
ORDINANCE NO. 34
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESTRIC•ING PARKING ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY
C. AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING PARKING FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. (First Read�nl)
The purpose of this ordinance Is to eliminate the parking of any motor
trucks or trailers or combinations thereof exceeding the gross weight of
three tons upon any public street, highway, or alley within the City. The
ordinance further provides that It is unlawful for the owner of any motor
truck or trailer or combination exceeding the gross weight of three tons
to allow the vehicle to remain standing on any street, highway, or alley
In the City
City Council Agenda -2- July 19, 1978
The ordinance does, however, provide that these units may be parked on
public streets, highways, or alleys under the rot lowing conditions:
a On designated truck routes for a period of time not exceeding one
hour.
b While making pickups or deliveries of goods or merchandise from or to
any property adjacent to or abutting upon streets or highways which
are not designated truck routes
C. When such vehicles parked In connection with and to aid of the
performance of a service to or on a property in the block in which
the vehicle Is parked.
In commercial zones the City Engineer may permit by the posting of appropriate
signs, limited parking for motor trucks, trailers or combinations exceeding
the gross weight of three tons where It Is determined that the prohibition
of parking would be contrary t -!he public Interest. It Is significant to
note the provisions of the -orl lance, If adopted by the City Council, shall
not apply In Industrial zones The Sheriff's Department has reviewed the
ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council introduce for
first reading ORDINANCE NO 27
ORDINANCE NO 27
AN ORDINANCE OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOIIGA, CALIFORNIA,ESTADt ISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS
FOR CERTAIN COMMERCIAL VEHICLES
D. RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF REVISED ORDINANCE WITH THE EDISON COMPANY. (First Readin
The City Council may recall that Ordinance No 16 was adopted on Narcti
15. 1978 The purpose of the ordinance was to grant to the Southern
California Edison Company a franchise for the construction and use for
the transmission and distribution of electricity within the City limits
cf Rancho Cucamonga At the time the ordinance was originally adopted,
a section was omitted from the ordinance relating to the duty of the
Edison Company to relocate facilities upon change of grade or widening of
streets The section should have been Included In the original ordinance
since It is a provision of the Franchise Act of 1937 The section which
was omitted was Subsection 6297 of the Public Utilities Code which reads
as follows:
"The grantee shall remove or relocate without expense to the
City any facilities installed, used and maintained
under the franchise if and when made necessary by any lawful
change of grade, alignment or width of any public treet, way,
alley, or place, Iuluding the construction of any subway or
viaduct by the City,"
In summary this particular section of the Public Utilities Code clearly
Indicates that the Edison Company has an obligation to relocate any facility
used and maintained under the franchise Such facility Include those
located within public streets, ways, or aliens whether Installed prior to
the date of the franchise or at a date thereafter
The City At Mrney has reviewed the appropriate sections of the revised
ordinance with the leg31 counsel representing the Edison Company and has
recommended that the appropriate revisions be made since they are Identical
to the wording of Section 6297 of the Public ti lit es Code
RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council Introduce for
first reading ORDINANCE NO. 33
City Council Minutes -3- July 19, 1978
7 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS:
A. RECOMMEND ADOPTION OF AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
For Street Lighting Services.
During the past few months since the City's Incorporation, the staff has
been working with the Southern California Edison Company to prepare an
agreement providing for the Edison Company to handle all street lighting
within the community Prior to Incorporation• street lighting In the Trl-
Community area was provided by the Edison Company th r%u9h -ile Street
Lighting Assessment District No I Beginning July 1, 1978• the City of
Rancho Cucamonga assumed responsibility for street lighting within the
City limits.
The purpose for the proposed street lighting agreement Is to establish the
responsibility for street lighting services within the City boundaries
beginning July 1, 1978 The contract with the Edison Company is for a
three-year period beginning Jui 1, 1970 and ending June 3.0, 1991 The
City Attorney has reviewed the agree as recommended -1 at it be
forwarded to the Cl ty Council for adoption. It Is significant to note
that the agreement Is a standard street lighting service contract which
has been adopted by other municipalities throughout the state
RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution
Ile. 78 -39
RESOLUTION NO 78.39
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET LIGHTING
AGREEMENT.
S. RECOMMEND AIIENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH JOHN BLAYNEY ASSOCIATES.
The City Council may recall that several months ago a contract was signed
with John Blayney Associates of San Francisco for the preparation of the
City's Ceneral Plan At the time the contract was signed, the maximum
was established at $37,500 Since that date, however, at the request of
the City, the consultant has prepared additional materials, notably,
those relating to Sketch Plan Alternative 14 which was presented to the
City Council In late June In addition to the work on Sketch Plan 14,
the consultant has also encountered additional costs which were not
anticipated because of Inadequate land use Information which originally
was supposed to have been made available by the County Planning Department
In so mary, It Is anticipated that the final costs for the preparation of
the City's General Plan will be approximately $57,661 Of the additional
costs, the consultant, Mr John Blayney, has agreed to absorb $10,161,
leaving the additional cost to the City at $10,000
RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council appropriate an
additional sum of $10,000 from the City's contingent account for the
revision of the General Plan contract wltn John Blayney and Associates.
C. REQUEST FROM MR. TON GRAY CHANGE IN CITY'S BROKER FOR HEALTH INSURANCE
Mr. Tom Gray has requested that he be placed on the City Council agenda
In order to request that the City Council withdraw the appointment of ti.e
present agent as the broker of rrcord for the City's Blue Cross health
Insurance policies fir Gray Is a local agent and is pro- tectin the
fact that the Blue Cross policy for City employees was Iced -with Empire
Insurance Co. rather than with Mr Gray
I
City Council Minutes -4- July 19. 1978
At the time the contract was signed for the Insurance coverage, the
City staff was under the Impression that the proposal offered by Empire
was somewhat better than the proposal submitted by Mr Gray Unfortunately,
It appears In preparing the policy, the Blue Cross representative made
an error and both proposals were Identical. As Council is aware, in
Instances where proposals are similar, the staff has been Instructed to
place the business with Insurance agents who are located In the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
RECOMMENDATION: In as much as the contract with Empire Insurance and
Blue Crass has already been signed based upon the fact that the staff felt
the proposal was the best, It Is recommeneded that no change be made
The matter will again be considered prior to the next fiscal year when
the City will be seeking proposals for health Insurance coverage At
that time, all agents will again have an opportunity to bid for the City's
employee Insurance package.
0. REPORT RE. ADVISORY COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES.
E. KINGSWAY CONSTRUCTION REQUEST TO WAIVE SOUNDBOARD REQUIREMENT.
Continued from the July 5. 1978 meeting An oral report by the City
Manager will be given
F. REQUEST TO CONDUCT A SPECIAL CENSUS. An oral report will be given
G. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CHANGES FROM THE TRAFFIC COMMITTEE REPORT.
RESOLUTION NO 78 -40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO -
CUCAMONGA, CALFIRONIA, ESTABLISHING THROUGH HIGHWAYr
AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES WITHIN THE CITY OF RIUI P
CUCAMONGA.
8. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS
9. CONSENT CALENDAR
THE FOLLOWING CO•ISENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NON-
CONTROVERSIAL THEY WILL BE ACTED UPON BY THE COUNCIL AT ONE TIME WITHOUT
DISCUSSION ANY COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF MEMBER, OR INTERESTED PARTY MAY
t, REQUEST THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR LATER
DISCUSSION
3
�a Building and Desslopment Plan Check Services - request from the Community
Development Department
b Tract 9157: Release Bonds In the amount of $5.800 to Kent Land Co.
Tract 9080: Release Bonds In the amount of $2 000 to Griffin Development
Co.
c. Tract 8958: Release Performance Bond (Road) In the amount of $68,000
and Material and Labor Bond (Road) in the amount of
$34,000 to Coral Investment, Inc
d. Approval of Bills
e. Tract 9585: Accept roads and Release Performance Bond (Water) In the
amount of $29,000 and Performance Bond (Sewer) in the amount
of $25,000 to Thompson Associates Development Corp.
Tract 9153: Release Performance Bond (Water) In the amount of $44,000
and Performanre Rnnrl (er, e.rl In lhn +rv,nnt of sir 000 to
City Council Minutes -5- July 19, 1978
Tract 9116: Accept road located at the northwest corner of Hillside
Road and Jasper Street - owner, Gary Miller
Tract 9287: Accept Roads located at the northeast corner of Lemon
Avenue and Carnelian Street - owner Crowell /Leventhal, Inc.
f. Accept Certificate of Deposit and Agreement of $3,500 by Delbert G
Barbara Stonebraker
g Accept Surety Bond and Agreement In the amount of $8,400 by Harold G
Donna Sears.
h Refer claim by Famela J Wilson against the City to City Attorney for
handling
I Refer claim by M Cortizo against the City to City Attorney for handling
J. Alcoholic beverage on -sale beer and wine application for David Caaou
for Ernie's at 7157 Amethyst Avenue
10 New Business
a Council
b. Audience
11 Adjournment
ORDINANCE NO. 15
AN ORDINANCE OF T11E CITY OF RANC110 CUCANONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, RESTRICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
Tne city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, doo ordain as follows:
SECTION It shall be unlawf•:1 for any person to park,
or cause to a p•ked, any motor truck, trailer or combination
thereof, �xceedin a gross weight of one -and- ono -half (1 -1/2)
tono, upon any priv ely -owned property in a reeidential zone
in the City between t o hours of 10:00 P.M. on ono day and
6:00 a.m. ^n kho following day
SECTION 2: All wo s and phrases used in this Ordinance
which are de ned in the Ve icle Code of the State of California. _
shall have the same meaning this Ordinance as they have in
the Vehicle Code.
1979. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
C 1-t 7-C er
•.���� Ure clay e
Rancho cameo.,.
. 6a
0
ORDINANCE NO. 34
0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, RESTRICTING PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
•^he\City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain`au follows:
SEC'ICN : It shall be unlawful for any person to park, or
cause ,.: be pai42d, any vehicle upon any privately owned property
in the City withcut the consent of the owner, tenant, or other per-
son entitled to rosefs \sio
`n of such property.
SECTION 2: For & purposes of this ordinance there shall
be s prasumption of lack 11 consent when all of the following con-
ditions exist:
(a) The
the owner, tenant or other
property.
(b) The
combination thereof.
a is not owned by or leased to
entitled to possession of the
is a motor truck, trailer, or
(c) The vehicle is asked on the property for
more than one (1) consecutive hour betty n tho nods of 30:00 p.m.
on one day and 6:00 a.m. on the following day
SECTION 3: All words and phrases uscA in this OrdLiance
which are de ned in the Vehicle Code of the te,to of California
shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance p they have in the
Vehicle Coda. \
1970.
APPROVED and ADOP•rED this day of
—'
Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST:
City Clark
C
613
9- • 0
ORDINANCE NO. �7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR CER-
TAIN COMMERCIAL VEHICLES.cl f
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Except as provided for herein:
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to
park any motor truck or trailer, or combination thereof, exceeding
a gross weight of three (3) tons upor my public street,
highway or alley within the City.
(b) It shall he unlawful for the owner of any
motor truck or "railer, or combination thereof, exceeding a gross
weight of three :3) tons to allow such vehicle to remain standing
upon any street, highway or alley in the City.
SECTION 2: Motor trucks er trailers, or combinations there-
of, exceo� nI g gross weight of three (3) tons may be parked an
public streets, highways or alleys as follows:
(a) On designated truck routes for a period of
time not exceeding one (1) hour.
(b) while mi ei.ng pickups or deliveries of
goods, wares or merchandise from or to any property adjacent to
or abutting upon streets or highways which are not designated truck
routes.
(c) When such vehicle is parked in connection
with and in aid of the perton.,.znce of a service to or on a property
in the block in which such vehicle is parked.
SECTION 1: In commercial zones, the City Engineer may per-
mit, by tl:e posting of appropriate signs, limited parking for motor
!� trucks, ti llors or combinations thereof exceeding a gross weight
s of three (3) tons where it is determined that to prohibit such
'} parking is antrary to the public interest.
SECTION 4: The provisions of this Ordinance shall not ap-
ply in incustriO zones
SECTION 5: All words and phrases used in this Ordinance
wnlch ':re defined in the Vehicle Code of the State of California
shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance as they have in the
Vehicle Code.
-1 � C
1978.
ATTEST:
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
City Clark
Mayor of-the C ty o
Rancho Cucamonga
-2-
•
r
Cent]emen1
1 not writing you in tie hopes that you will care enough to help me with a
very important problem to my fm'11y We were lucky enough to be able to
afford a hame and purchased it with pride Since this purchase, however,
I find a distressing Problem. Our homy is on the rorner of'Napa (cul- de -rac)
and Baseline in Alta Loma We are directly &croon from the Sunrise Shopping
Center.
T'ue problem to that caumercial trucks park along this street (Baseline) with
dally regularity by children's windows to their bedrooma are about 20 feet
from the curb where these tricks park. They park there during the night and
all weekend sometimes With Summer on us, it is too hot to sleep with bedroom
windows closed up and we dare not keep them open due to -the fumes and noise.
Some of these trucks are refrigerated and run all night long My one child Is
asthmatic end I know how despirste she feels At times breathing these Saxes.
When these trucks start up, I am -not kidding at all when r tel:, you in the
Summer these flues fill our entire home I am not trying to be unreasonable,
It the trucks would merely drive a few hundred more feet, they could park out
or sight or the houses and disturb no one By this, I mean in the area of
the Wash or beyond slightly
I have writtun several times to the Transportation Department in ran Bernardino
and they informed me that it was not a traffic hazzard by the trucks parking
there (However, when you come out of a side street, you cannot see around
them) Fula - Bless, they didn't hear what I wse saying about the health of my
children and their discomfort
I no reques ting that you 1p ease, hear what I am Baying If you cannot help
me. Sire, please refer me to on^ that can, and Will hear and help mpg family
Sincerely,
CLela Cl 1z&W&7 /
Carol B Anderson
7285 Nape Street
Alta Loma, CA 9170)
)�EIT F. -
JUL 22 618
CM OF RANCHO
ORDINANCE NO 33
AN Or DINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCI03F THE ITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA �,$ECiiiL7NG —�
ORDINANCE NO 16 AND GRANTING TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS,A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT
AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING
ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES,
WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLU.)ING
COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER
THEREFORE, III, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND
UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES
WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The City Council of the Ci %y of Rancho Cucamonga
does ordain as follows:
Section 11: Whenever in this Ordinance the. words or
phrases hereinafter In this section defined are filled, it is
intended that they shall have the respective meanings aosigned
to thtm in the following definitions (unless, in the Given
instance, the eontext wherein they are used shall clearly
import a different meaning):
(a) The word "grantee" shall mean the corpo-
tmtlon to t,hich the franchise contemplated in this
Ordlnance is granted and its lawful successora or
assigns; ..
(b) The word "City" rha)l mean the City of
Rancho ruentionga, a muuicical eorporeti3n of the
State of California, in its present incorporated
form or in ..n, Inter reorganized, consolidated,
enlarged or reincorporated form;
(c) The word "streets" shall rrin the public
rtrects, wlyn, nllcys all(; places as the lame nnw
or may hereafter exist within rni,: City;
(d) 'rile phrase "poles, wires, condultl and
nu pfi rtem fires" Shall mean poles, tow "ra, supports
wires, rand.lr tars, cables, ruyl, stubs, platforms,
crossorms, bracer, transfnrmers, insulators, con -
dultn, ducts, v•lults, manholes, meters, cut -outs,
switches, cmmnunlention circu,ts, anpliancel,
attachments, appurtenances and may other property
over or under the streets of said City, and used
433
or useful, directly or indirectly, for the purpose
of tranomlt;ing or distributing c� ^etriclty;
(e) The phrase "construct and use" shall mean
to lay, construct, erect, lustall, operate, maintain,
use, repair, replace or relocate.
Section 2: The franchise to use and to construct
and use, for transmitting and distributing electricity for any
and all purposes, poled, wires, conduits and appurtenances,
Including communication circuits, necessary or proper therefor,
in, along, across, upon, over and under the streets within the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby granted to Southern California
Edison accordance pwith the provisions of s the FranchisenAct ofe193T�.. to
Section-3: Said franchise shall be indeterminate„
that is to�aay, said franchise shall endure in full force and
effect until, with the consent of the Public Utllitiee Commio-
slon of the State of California, the same shall he voluntarily
surrendered or abandoned by the grantee, or until the State or
some municipal or public corporation thereunto duly authorized
by law shall purchase by voluntary agreement or shall condemn
and take under the power of eminent domain, all property actu-
ally used and useful in the exercise of said franchise and
situate within the territorial limits of the state, municipal
or public corporation purchasing or condemning such property,
or until said franchise shall be forfeited for noncompliance
with its terms by the grantee.
Section 4: The grantee of "aid franchise, during
the life t ereol, will pay to said City two percent (2f) of
the gross annual receipts of said grantee aricing from the use,
operation or possession of said franchise; provided, however,
that such payment shall in no event be less than one percent
(.%) of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the
sale of electricity within the limits of said City.
Section 5: T'e grantee shall file with the City Clerk
of said City, x thin three (3) months after the expiration of
the calendar year, or tractional calendar year, following the
date of the granting of thla franchise, and within three (3)
mo,.tns after the expiration of each calendar year thereafter,
a verified statement ohowing in detnll the total gross receipt..
of said grantee derived during the preceding calendar year, or
ouch fractional calendar year, from the sLle of electricity
within the limits of said City The grantee shall pay to said
City within fifteen (15) days after the time for filing said
statement, in lawful money of the United States, the aforesaid
- 2 -
,�i
- r • • _ 3
I Percentage of its grons receipts for the calendar year, or
fractional calendar year, covered by said statement. Any
neglect, omission or refusal by said grantee to file said
verified statement, or to pay said nercentage at the times
or in the manner hereinbefore provided, shall constitute grounds
for the declaration of a forfeiture of this franchise and of
all rights of grantee hereunder.
thirty (70j
Section ction its i Ordinance shall
passage, become
by referendum petition filed as provided by law.
Section 7, The grantee of this franchise shall
pay to the City a sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for
all publication expenses incurred by it in connection with
the granting this franchise; said payment to be made within
thirty (30) days after the City shall have furnished said
grantee with a written statement of such expenses.
Section Si The franchise granted hereby shall not
become effac�ve unt written acceptance thereof shall have
been filed by the grantee with the City Clerk of said Cit..,
Sv..uon g: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance
to be posted wT<fiTn MTf teen (15) days after its passage in
three (3) public places within said City.
without expensectoot a City any facilitieslinstalled, used relocate
maintained under the franchise if and when made necessary by any
lawful change of grade, alignment or width of any public street,
way, alley, or place, including the construction of any subway
or viaduct by the City
Sv�ti ^r. 11: T%le urdinance ieei s Ordinance o.
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City held on the- day of 1978, and- -
finally adopted and ordere3 posted at a regu'Tar meeting of the
City Council held on the day of _ 1978, by the
following voce:
ATTEST:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
It EMORANDUM
TO: Lauren 11. Wasserman, City Manager
PROMS Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney
DATEt June 21, 1978
PE: Southern California Edison Company Franchise.
We are in receipt of a copy of a letter from H. Clinton
Tinker, Senior Counsel of Southern California Edison Company.
The uriginal, dated June 12, 1978, was addressed Lo you. Now
that the City has Mr. Tinker's assurances, we no longer have
an objection to the questioned language in the Franchise nrdi-
Bence being amended to read identical to the wording of Section
6297 of the Public Utilities Code.
At a recsnt meeting with Mr. Randy Bond, he indicated
that Southern California Edison Company would take care of all
the logistics in connection with the adoption of a revised Fran-
chise ordinance. 1 would recommend that you coordinate directly
with fir. Bond.
RED:egg
Enclrsuao
�A
C yN �2A
ck °F yYa
' r+
Southern California Edison Companv
L' uu w..xur axova..a... '
l.µ • ne)(x[.e•a.uieQNi. \,f)0 ' '1'
r�r N. CLINTON TINx[N uweawwrxwr nu•"or)
X15 <p
June 12) 1178 ;_Q
a , °•e'• r • AEG
i Hr. Lauren •i. +)nsserman
• • ^os„ Office lox 7 ^3 r ? St, `�,OL6 • }��` ",. "�
a`• a Oue2monca, California
''•. �L no: 1Q17 fr+n0lise Act Ordinance City Of'
Ly, Rancho Cuclnon ^a
,109Crnnn:
":c °rene'llre Act of ln37 ( -1' 191 r?r7 'ublle
Utilities rode) orovidea as follo•as•
+
142g7, Dut,+ of -r^ntee to *slocitr "10t1ibi -3 uson , •,j
r�;�•�: chan -e of ;Tade or uidanin , of streets, qtc. r
1 -d?
ranter ❑':aa rurove or rclnsat• ..i':,olt t,)�cmo
rat, to t:,.e runtCl-ziv': en'• fcetlit + "- imt••11 ^d u-0'. , •"
• a.1,' ..n tnta+ -,.l cLn i ^r the rr, 1C.1i'so :In" t.,Cn ",v10
noco: ;%ry b•, + +•+ i:•: "ul Chan ^n of !•sad^ sli- nr• "n:, '
or ai,it.1 of ••mile atrort, na",, ol.Le'• or nlice,
inclu dn- -:x '^-istruction of an•• aub.r ='1 or viaduct,
b;: Vin, runlr -1 •a,.it7. • , y ......
As ini'.catea in t',t: s "ctton, the ohli °!ticn to r3lecate +•
P ^Tli•Is to any "acilitien used and•raintairr.•: under tho, •',
; y franchisa. - +;ch facilities Snclu•lcrWwr? in0ttza :rithin,:la •r•. �`, %'
franchise rrcn (pu ;iic streets, %j Zr, : -115.1 a nr nlncoa) • 1.1t, I, ^^ether inat:alled n ^io•• to t'I(. fletq Oi L :1C T•,itinf of the ^ a'.•�'„•�.
1 ranchiro or Subsequent thereto. ,, , ? ;.CO'/ s; "•
igi•%1 :IS nrovided in "action (261 e-f t'•e ende, "any '�y.C'"
,..•'�' franc )isc ••r: •aei under• Y1ie chapter •-it', r ^nnrct to a' riven ,
utility aervicr is in lieu of rll other fr %ne'•Sr+ss, r1;•'hts, ..1 p
rrtvilc' :QS clued h•• tat, F+tnreo „o ^•, ••nowlel�e, no /• cI`+y
7>: contention her, been caste by any utility in :Mlifornia that
., J• th^ I. Location rnquirellent 1a hmite1 to t :10 "c faciliticn ' , ' l;-�•A',t
,4.•,•• irttal Led aWmequent to the data of the t•rrntin^ o^ a 1937 :.C,iG n„
•' acL ft -A -10 :lire. y �A o
r, A
�j j 1 ' r _ S r, _ . .�i•
xi%��I. ''�i,,�•t•!�a!i1,i .,, i -,( ':."File:
'$r. Lauren .1. 11aseermn ,r,1'ry••
City :tanager - ^- June 12, 1978
�• iq' Your attanticn is also •t. reete•i to the case of r '�'•,
Los An -ales County Plotlt Control Dint• ict V. "oathern
5 — !cM.t o
California ::'�ison Cocnan•� tl 51 C.2d 1, 3 P.2d
wherein the court holh chat in the ahaenee of a nrovision',
to the contrar+, a publ ?c utility accepts franchise riEbts , t,2�� ; r'
1,.;,..
in public streets oubject to an implied obli-ation to (C
Q relocate its facilities therein at its o�m expense •than 1;Y.1y;�� <r` 1
necessary to race ray for proper governmental use ofj rt's- ..,•�; .
1�
streets. - .v, :,' t'a'i"' '��:,; .rt�t ^��'��:1+%��.WL•
1 Very truly yo,rs, ,•, y
CPinton ?in'rcr
' Senior Counsel
{ UCT:dhb
ac: fer.uel Crowe � "J,•rs�,�
�. City Attorney I A�.; ?;�!';n. t,•e
IN
is •' -` ; % etc +'�:byr i!
(x° c
J
I 1y • y P init�
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET
LIGHTING AGREEHI:NT.
The City Couacil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does hereby "esolve, determine and order as follows:
SECTION is Tht proposed contract for street lighting
between t ie City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, and Southern
California ndison Company, a copy of which is attached hereto,
is approved.
SECION 2z
u exatcut The
said t
acontJ acConybehalf of e the trity of and
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
1978. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
Mayor ox the City o{' --" --
Rancho Cucanonga
CC -ty C11 rk -
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly
and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof
held on the day of 1978.
DATED:
1978.
C ty Clerk Of the city
of Rancho Cucamonga
7A
Y
M
• 0
Southern California Edison Company
•,o so•w
nu e. rw •x u•TT w[[T
Ox Tw..lO C........•.....
April 6, 1978
City of Rancho Cuca- nga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Gentlemen,
SUBJECT: Proposed Street Light Contract
Street lighting in the tri- community area has in the past been _
provided by Southern Califorhla Edison Company as requested by the
San Bernardino County Road Department on behalf of Street Lighting
District No. 1. I understand the City of Rancho Cucamonga will
assume responsibility for atreat lighting service within city
boundaries effective July 1, 1978.
In order to facilitate your efforts in affe.ting the transition to
city administration of street lighting aervice, I an providing a
suggested street lighting contract format used by other municipal
customers In our service territory. This is the same one I gave
to Hayor Frost on "rcember 13, 1977.
Please review it and return it to me with any comments or changes you
may wish to make. if the document farm is acceptable to you, I will
have the necassgry number of copies prepared for execution by the
City and our company.
I m also enclosing copies of our present LS -1 (utility -owned system)
and LS -2 (customat -owned system) rate schedules.
If you have any questions regarding the. rbove, pleaae call me at
98. }1746.
$'
Sincerely,
,
IS,
R. W Boiyi
City /Area Manager
.'
n
RWB:ub
ti"
,
,pia
Enclosures
(�V'
Sm Crowe
GIGF Gl1Gw:
03
.14.25.15 • • Edam System a Alarwed
)Levlted rest 5115175
r.
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE FOR STREET LIGHTING
THIS AGREEMENT, made this_ day of . 19_, by and between
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter designated as
Company, and the CITY COUNCIL OF acting for and on behalf of
, (Lighting District) in the County of .Stale
of California. hereinafter designated as Customer.
%V ITNESSET11
FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF the payments hereinafter to be made by
I Customer to Company. Company agrees to furnish, in aes.ordance with its Tariffs as riled
with and approved by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California (the
Commission). electric cnagy to illuminate lice street lights located in and owned by said
City and Lighting District. and to furnish all tools, labor, material lamps, equipment, and
electric energy ncessary to install, nasntain, and operate the street lighting syst, car which Is
to be owned by Company. as provided by Companv's Rules, in said City and Lighting
District, for a period or three (3) years, commencing I r , and
terminating 5" S r, /IAi , and from year-to-year thereafter, unless tcnuinalcd as
herein provided
Ail installations shall be made at locations as shown on ylap No._ on file fn the
office of the ("q• Clerk, which said plan was filed on _ . 19 _ In proceeding
I for the establishment of slid street lighting, pursuant to Resolution of Intention No.
Attached hereto and marked L•xldbil "A" and made apart hereof by this refcmnce
ma copy of said Map. Any modification of or in locations as indicated on Exhibit "A" will
I be set rurih on additional maps furnished rto -n time to time by Customer for such purpose.
Customer aRecs to take. receive. and use for a continuous perind of not less than three
0) years from date first esicrgved. lice electric energy and service supplied and funishcd to
I each street light or street fighting system requested by 0isionser and to pay Company
bimonthly therefor at the rates and under the terms and conditions set furlh in Rate
Fiouxr f. hpretmenl For Sorvice For Street Ughting
2 ; ipssaro+o Uneu,¢sror — customv Srvics crrec
r
I
.1
W
Sawhem CaMarss Eduah CV
14.25.15
Re"sed felt 5115175
Schedules Nos LS-1 and LS-2 and at such higher or lower rates, pursuant to such new or
amended tariff schedules. applicable to Customer, as may from time to time be ordered or
allowed :o become effective in accordance with law by the Commission, regardless of how
or by whom proceedings resulting In such cihange may have been initiated, including
proceedings Initiated by Company and in accordance with Company's Rules on file from
time •a time with said Commission. Copies of said Rate Schedules arc attached hereto
marked Exhibit "B" and by this reference made a part hereof
Customer agrees to commence using the street lighting In a bona ndc manner within
ninety (90) days after the date of completion of an installation of a street light or street
lighting system requested by Customer. _
It ts understood and agreed that where cicetrolicrs arc to be served by means of
Company-owned underground system, Customer will advance to Company Company's
estimated difference in Installed cost of the underground syslam and a st.mdard olvnccad
system. And. Customer will advance to Company Company's estimated cost of trenching,
b3c6nllmg, and restoring pavement to tin satisfaction of the applicable public agency having
junsdiclnn. or will furnish same Including therein Compmy's requirements. Further, where
Customer elects to have Company-owned ornamental electroliers Installed in a
Companyowncd system. Customer shall pay to Company Company's estimated Installed
cost differential of said ornamental electrolier(s) in accordance with Exhibit "C" attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.
It is undcnloud and •greed that all poles. wins, fixtures. lamps. and other appliances,
supplied and uwd by Company In furnishing the service herein provided for, shall at all
times, be and remain the property of Company.
It is further understood and agreed that the following conditions arc to govun: All
poles. wires• lights, and electrical apparatus Installed by Company in furnishing service under
this agrcenent. shall he so placed as to work the least possible public and pr:vatc
inconvenience. and Customer may at any time order the location of any part of the system
changed by Company at the expense of Customer to conform to the above requirements.
Flaunt 1. Agreement For SOYIee for Strut Ughung fpsge a)
SoouSCw.o OnwrourCo — Cualo SMCO areo 3
14.25/.15
RstscO rat 5/15/75 •
• Cchson Syslam at sfairam s
Customer MuMes the tight to abrogate this contract whenever current Is offered at
two-thirds the price fixed in Ibis contract.
,Ills agreement may be terminated by either party hereto at the end of the initial three
(3) year term or at the end orally succeeding annual period by written notice given not less
than sixty (60) days prior to the end of said three (3) year tern or of any succeeding annual
Period. Such termination shall not affect the obligations nor liabilities of either of the
Patti" hereto, or either of tbem. accruing at ouch date of termination. And Companyshall
have the right to remove or abandon Company -owned street Ir£hfing facilillcs, wholly or in
Part. upon expiratmn of Ibis contract or of any renewal Ihercof
Customer may request termination of wrvice to a street fight or street ligiit(ngsys
Prior to the expiration of the Initial c,mlinuous three (3) year service m
perlal required by t tent comact In such event, Company will discontinue energy thereto and billing therefor In
accordance rith its filed Tariffs, and Company may, but is not obligated to, remove all or
any potion of said terminated street lighting facilities and to bill Customer for installation
and removal charges for facilities not fulfilling said continuous Ihmc.Year period
requirement.
11 is understood and agreed that should Customer request within the initial three (3)
1) an Mercer
year period s" or decrease In lamp size or 3) a change in mounting height of a
luminaire. such changes shall be at Custcmer expense and on completion of modification a
new initial three (3) Year period shall commenec. Further, relocation of at, ornamental
cleclruher upon request of Customer shall be at expense of Customer
The time of scmce for any workman emplovcd to do any part of tic work
contemplated by this contract Is limited and mstricled to eight hours during any one
calendar day and lorry' hnurz during any one calendar week, except as permitted by the
provoions of Section IRIS of the Labor Cmlc: it is further apiced that ht the case of any
violation In this regard of the provisions of Section IR161815, inclusive, of said Labor
Code, Company shall forfeit to Customer the sum of 525 for each workman employed in
execution of this contract for each calendar day during which such workman Is mquiredor
Aaoxz 1. Agreement for $#Nice For StrNl ugaang (p+p. 3)
Swr6onsu CrWMx TXN — Cwtwnor Sank, ciao
M
v
1
l
FA
J
Souit o r Caldomci Eason Lynpany
Revised rut 9/15/76
permitted to work more than eight hours during any one calendar day and forty hours
during any one calendar week, except as provided In Section 1815 aforesaid.
This contract shall, at all times, be subject to such changes or modifications by
the Commission as said Commission may, from time to time, direct in the exercise of Its
Jurisdiction.
If Company shall be prevented by strikes• by order of court, by public authority, by
order of the Commission, or other causes beyond the control or the parties hereto, or either
of them, from furnishing the service herein provided for, It shall not be liable in damages to
Customer for such failure but a proportionate reduction In the -mounts payable to
Company by Customer for street lighting service hereunder, based on the period of
suspension or suds urvice, shall be made in ease of such tadurc.
In addition to, and under limits of liability set forth in the preceding paragraph.
Company may, In the absence of as: order from the Commission, apportion the supply of
electric energy in a manner that appears to Company most equitable, under conditions
then prevailing. This provision for apportionment or the supply of electric energy shall
include, but not be limited to, the right to apportion in the event of brownouts, blackouts,
or energy curtailment programs.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto hive caused these presents to be excLuted
by Weir officers thereunto duty authorized the day and year first above written.
CITY COUNCIL CIF TIM CITY OF SOUCIIERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY
ACTING FUR AND ON IILIIALF OF BY
(Ughtlnr District) ATTEST*
BY
Pile• DATE:
A'PfEST
Title:
Emuxe 1. Agreement fa Soria for Sbaal Ugbang (page 4)
5naaowso O? VAZAneM — Cusrmbr Se.•wa C%12
5
14.25.15 •
Naveatl Tart 5115173
E%lllolT "C"
• CWOri System OF a/arxra/a
PARAGRAPH I - payment it made at lime of installation.
Company shall furnish, install and maintain ornamental cleetroliers and appurtenances
thereto in lieu of word poles at the current installation cost differential of S___- _per
(stecl /concrete) ornamental cicetrober where the elcetsoher Is used sn
lieu of a wood pole. and S ---ter (stcclleonerclN onhanhenul
cicctruher where Ilse cleclrolier is used in the s l.nulY of an existing wood pole, either Com-
pany's nr other l)tiboes' pnle, which could be utilized for the street lighting lunimaire instal-
lation, pa5'ablc by Cuslmncr to Company in a smSic payment wludi shall be made upon instal -
lallon of the electrohen. Funds for this current installation payment have bean incorporated
in the 19.— -12 _ - budget for this district
It is understood and agreed that charges for additional ornamental cleclrullery and
appurtenances thereto will be at the then current installation cost dif(arenliai which is
subject to change July first of each year
PARAGRAPH 2- Payment Is deferred for to months front date of mstallall"
C-onpauy shall turnuls, install alit) maintain omamental Ocellulncm and appurtenanccs
therctu in lieu of wmid Poles at tlse current Installation cmt Jdterenliai of S __ _ Per
olcellconeretc) ornmueulal electrode where the elecsohcr is used m
—' - — (stecllc-oncrcte) ornamental
lieu of a wool pole. and 5 __ __— Par ---- --
clecltulier where the ele,.troher is used In the vicinity of an existing wood pose, eilh" Coni-
pany's or other Uuhnc, p,sle. which could be utilized for tine street lighting luminaire mstal-
lainon, payable by Customer to C'ongsany in a single payment which shall be made on
.19 Ito munllis following date of the installation of electruliess).
Funds for tills current Inslalletiun paynhent have been incor itualed In the 19 __-Iv
budget rot this district.
It r unt;vmmnl anti agreed that charges for addul -anal ornamental elccilf0herl and
appurtenances thereto will be at the then current Installation cml differential which is
subject to changes Lily first of each year
Fraaaa 2. Muni 'C'
S o 4 Cimivaxtsau - Costa" Santa GVSaa
I
J
sa,'sern CJLM w Edson Cer
• 14.25.15
1W4W Tut 5/15/75
PARAGRAPH 7 • First payment is deferred for 10 months from date of Installations amt the
second payment Is due 12 months after the first payment (22 months after Installation).
Company shall furnish, install and maintain ornamental electroiiers and appurtenances
thereto in lieu of wood poles at the current installation cost differential of S per
(steel /concrete) ornamental electrolier where the deetroller is used in
lieu of a wood pole, and 5 per (stal /concrete) ornamental
clectrolier where the electrolicr Is used In the vidnity of an existing wood pole, either Com-
pany's c� hit 1!tilitics' pole, which could be utilized for the street lighting iuminatre Instal-
latlon, vi, c by Customer to Company in two payments. The first payment, consistingor
one-half of the above current installation cost differential, shall be made on x
19_ (10 months following date of Installation of electrolfers). The second payment,
consisting of one-half of the above current installation cost differential, shall be made on
19_(22 months following date of installation of clatrolica). Funds for
the first payment have been incorporated in the 19 451_ budget for this district and
funds for the second payment will be Incorporated iu the 19_ 19_ budget for this
district.
It is understood and agreed that charges for additional ornamental eiearoliers and
appurtenances thereto will h at the then current installation wit differential which is
subject to champ: July first of each year.
hausx s Exhibit 'C' (page 2)
gnaxscM4 Oiwttxranvs — custo w service vw
7
•rr
' • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIV&SON COMPANY
2244 Vlolnut Grant: AJenue 01%d GI. Ir.UC Shat No. 4799.E
Rosemead, California 91770
Un(cllmR Rensni Cal. P.0 C Sleet No. 4769•L
Schedule No. LS-1
LIGHTING- STREET AND HIGHWAY
UTILITY -OWNED SYSTEM
APPIICA9111tY
Apphohfe to street and highway lighting &mice anpplied from overhead li,cs where the Company own, and
malnlcm the erc" light-Off egrnpmrnL
TERRfTORY
Within the eodre tnntwy acmr& excluding eanu Catalina island
RATES
-- [nmpr auraa:e..nt drMa
sudKOM a
tavfmhnt radad"
A9 M141pmirr amw G.wp.
{a^p lfar -lomrM rw MSma Par Mond yr. M.M1
Incandescent lamps -`-
1,000 Lumens_ ... _._ ... „...„ S 332 S 3.04 S 1.90
2,500 lumont ... _. _. 5.01 4.46 2.49
4,000 lumens ..... ___.._...__._._.._.. 6.16 5.28 2.34
6,000 Lumcm._._,r•,_.___..._. ._...__ 7.67 6.43 2.52
10,000 tumen,- ,.._...._ 10.33 8.60 2.76
Mercury Vapor lamps
3,500 lumens S 4.79 S 4.48 $ 3.09
7,000 Lumant _.__ „._...._......_„,.___ 5.72 5.16 3.19
11,000 Lumens ......... ............ 6.87 5.85 3.3S
20,000 Lumen, . _ 872 7.45 3.51
35.0001umens. _. 13.04 10.87 4.29
S5,0001umons.. ... 16.87 15.02 4.65
High Pre,sura Sodium Vapor Lamps
5,800 lumens 5 700 S 6.78 S 4.77
9,500 lumen,_.___ ._.. _.. 7.66 7.35 4.84
16.0001umrns.___. _. 8.29 7.81 4.88
25,500 lumens „._ ,.•. ...... 9.77 8.93 4 88
47,000 tument_.. _.._ 12.05 10.71 5.30
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Standard Equipment Purnlsheds finesse rr ma,r arm ,..r.u•a•frn eJl he lnrnFhrd. \tTrrr fn.thle
fam ref ?t fa•:' ysr, « are ,n•mm'vn ccm,lrarnon nar 1 e hrrnnlrc l Fn.l+.rd Ium(ral«s .0I he (omNhN fm
IamM n(:cM •s -.r, •, rr larger. and "en reflector hchu +g a +in nJl .rc han'•bnl for tamp. of TOM lament. Such
,tan'taM h- '••i•:.. nPmrnt ;.11 1- vt"hr l to wmf Perk,.
i Othsr Than Standard Equipment-
by C,• r,.-rran7 an.I .ash ee•I rr.lni en+p•rrrr :. arrry +ter to •hr Crmpanr, the CnmpanT arRl
m•bll a'• r I r411_n:rm rPn V.r+l the rn•tmnrr urrn rn ad, voce hm r•n.n,Ird A'0rrmca H rmt lnna0ed betwem
mrh m ^'r nr" - I .•a +.Lnl .....me m. Ad,ancn mad• lr 'I'll 11111-1 eenn•rn -r aar r 11 no he endrd installed en nr:..h Trrnents heenme a,,4 rmain the 'rr,•C•r•r 1 dr
C1minny.
3, Hours of Scaler I nder the Comivnl't snn•hll all nig""creting schedule alprmimatdy 4,No hoe "of
scarce Mr year •JI he fe"ahcd.
tesnrr,a.d1
"•N.r•YNvtl emNb ..
Adsrc Icv✓' <n Iln-t_ CJwanl A. Sbcs, Jr D,:c Id,d
Jurc 51. t 17-
Occisim No. I BNnc July 21, 1971
Vice PM1410. M 7!11
SOUTHERN CAUFORNIAS Avenue SON COMPANY
4744 Walnut Gr 0-i Cal. PP.U.C. Sheet No. 4733.8
Rosemead, Colifvrnlo 91770
Nat. r.ta.c,. Niece
Sr- hodule No. LS-1
LIGHTING — STREET AND HIGHWAY
UTILITY-OWNED SYSTEM
.
K *"d) --
SPECIAL_ CONDITIONS (Continued)
4. Removal or Modification of Equipment: 6":-ere street fehling service and f3emn!s were ordered
removed or modified by a eortmmr and Nosh smdce and facilities, m their tumaknl. ere ordered remsulled wid,ia .tv
months Itom the cute of the order to remove or to modify, the Customer shall pal to the utility in advance of reimuUa•
lion a nemelandable amount equal to the cost of removal or modiLration of the prim tsoilides and the estimated Coat
of ouch rtLgmllstlen. FacDntes removed of insulted eeauin the ale property of the utility. -
S. Energy Coat Adjustments The rates above fm all night service are subject to adjmtmeot as Provided for to
rut G of tee rretiminary Statrosent. The applicable enerp ems adjastment Wlina factor, and fuel collection balance
adjusempt billing :actor set fr-Ih there[- win be •PPl96 to 79 luhe Per month per IoW Wrocss W imusideaecnt lamps,
to 10 Lehr per month per ]AM [omens fee mercury vapor lamp, and to 4 kwhr per month per low lumen, for high
pressure todmm taPor lamps.
6. Energy Curtailment Servtcet
a. Where the customer re lue,u the institution auditor removal of equipment in ore+ to obtain, Erectile
Cmuilment Service, and such request is acceptable to the uhGly. the utility win tomp.y with such ragout
pro:idcd the customer fiest agree, to Ny to otdo, the estiruted Cost imulled of soy addnnnal tquiprii
required and/or the removal con of any equipment Currently insulted. Such psymmu sill not be refunded
and shall be paid in advance of In Installment, acceptable to uhbty over a period of not b fasted these yeua
Fsdlaies Insulted in comectI a will, such equals became and remain the sole ptoperty of the uu7ity.
6 Ueda the unlay s midnight (PST) m equivalent service operating schedule, approximately 7,000 bourn of
service per Jeer, win be furnished
L Facilnia dart:,, dull be applicable under this schedul: truly nhm the aGlity has been requested co discon-
• --e the ulna¢ semee by the customer and the Customer has stipulated that the fitjrtiles are in, be left
m place for future us,
d The Car, abocg for midnight m egatnlent scri are subjett to adjustment as provided for in Pan G
I I- I'InIp11Ma•r t,atemrnl The .".Hui,'. •meaty r-I a,liunmrnt hiltma uc!Cvv and fact collection
bA nee mhu.pmrnt Ldhou factor its filth thenm udl hr arp:wd to IS L•shr per month per IA* lumens for
iacar•Itxtnt unena. to S Lahr Per ci per IJIW Icemen, fm mcrcory salvor lamps. used to 7 kwhr per
each Per 1.0100 looses. for high pullme,adttrm state lamps.
Re b krxaH by rld.It
Ad%ke LrUn'%a 479 L (Surd.)
Lkriaion No.
F.Ivl ,r_dur Jr.
�sR Pres'rdat
ID
Date Fdcd Ek!tkcr 6, 1976
rdfaclive Ocukcr 13. 1976
s..,..4v:.. V•. r,4,e rtrot
SOUTHERN CALIFORNUSISON COMPANY
2244 Walnut G o Avenue d W. p,U.0 51utt No. 41WII
Rosemead, California 91770
I w w 6CPA
Schedule No. LS-2
LIOFITING— STREET AND HIGHWAY
CUSTOMER -OWNED INSTALLATION
APPLICABILITY
A pnoble to service for s1. dghdrg of suetta. hishwa7s. other pab�u thoroughfares, and Publicly o cucl and
yublicPpopcatcd antomohde puking e,ta which ere opro to the geaenl public, wbere the customer owas the street
fighting naipmna
TERRITORY
Within th. cause territory armed. excl.ding &lots Cauliw Island.
RATES
An repo s.,rY.
M W& Mnb
RATE A— UNMETE,tED SERVICE: gip'
For each kw of lamp load, fn kw..._—._. $10.45 $12.16
57.88 $8.69
RATE 0— METERED SERVICE:
Ia lrr
rau.w
Meter Charges
--
multiple Servin .____�.__...
$ 1.30
Series Servtn _ _
TOAD
Energy Charge (to be added to Meter Chargol:
First 150 kwhr per kw of lamp food, per kwhr__._
4,870*
All excess kwhr, per kwhr_�.___._. —.
1.5440
RATE C— MAIN7ENAFICE SERVICE— OPTICNALs
In a!dilton to the Rate A and Rots B charges
Vtliw�.'s t..tfs.
is M.r"r
1,000 incandescent Extended Somlw _
$0.36
2.500 Incandescent Extended Somico—
0.39
4,000 Incandescent blended Sorvin_ �
. 0.39
61000 Incandescent Extended Service_.__,_
0,41
10,000 Incandescent Extended Service ~
_ 0,41
3,500 Mercury Vapor.—
0.42
7,000 Mercury Vapor
0.37
17,000 Mercury Vapor ._—
_ u.44
20,000 Mercury Vapor ____.___ _.
OAT
35,000 Mercury Vapor.___. -- _ ��_
0.62
55,000 Mercury Vapor----.--.
—�
0.62
5.800 High Pressure Sodium Vapor _ _ ._ _
_ 1.40
9,500 High Pressure Sodium
1.60
1,60
_
16,000 High Pressure Sodium Vapor
.�
1.60
25,500 High Pressure Sodium Vapor_
—_ 1.58
_�
47,000 High Pressure Sodium Vapor ._
1.62
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
1. Ownership of Facilities:
a. For multiple systems the Company will dclim arr.icc at 120.120R49 tolls, sir, at the option of the Company,
at 2401490.oiu,thart wires ranch pha.e. rer ,Nws s) 'l ms the Ceapany win (err d•h and maintain cones,'
current fegetatieg uandormns and deG.er service at the 1eceodw7 side of sue!, tnmloemns,
b. The cesteaer w01 lanhh and maintain all ofiliration emdpment beyond the point of delivery except For
milatename sine rmided by the Company In umdann with SpecW Condition 1
e Uctct lonpxs lot otalnpk qucma stun be at pints mutaags agreed Trial, Ale"r bratioes far win
systeaa shall be on the primary aupply citcuit to the mines current rrgetating transformer at a Pelee
accep'abie to the Cea•pany.
laale.11
Adrke Enter No. 410E
Detitioa No.
rdwud A. hfycrs. :r.
Vice Prodcnt
,. p aawnN sir GL y.U.Gt
nor riled June 24, 1977
rnccucs July 21. 1977
R.nluti.n Nn.
r
SOLITHLRpI CALIFORNIA 00N COMPANY RQJ U. P.U.G Shat No. 4801.13
2244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California 91770
Carecam8 Revised Cal. P.U.C. Sheet 7:0. 4581.H
Schadull, No. LS-2
LIGHTING — STREET AND HIGHWAY
CUSTOMER-OWNED INSTALLATION
(ww.n
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Continued)
2. Lamp Loads The lamp load for tegmlar (general purpose) multiple incaodeuent lamps shall be the mamor
factorial Imp tiling In veto.
The Imp load is rata for low= rued street lighting lamps shelf be u foldows:
t—,,.
r x"1w.
Pro. vror
wwn
125
208
292
447
447
753
1,058
wmr
82
140
202
320
ASS
Tool lamp load sball be determined m the count I /10 kw.
3. Maintenance Services Maleseeanee service furnished by the ulgily under Rate C for the limps sped0ed
shall Iodide the followings
A. Renewal of hops after The orletaal Installations by rbt eastomcr.
b. Regvlu!aryecuoa.
m Periodic dozing of globe
d. Iabor of replacing Limps =4 globca.
Innndeacent lamps furnished under this praviriun will be calended semcc lamps only. Mercury vapor lamps and
high perils" Podium nWr lamps furnished under this province will be as specified by the utllny. Globes for raises]
dull be fnni.bcd by I:.e customer. }twin cranes rc nice null he Innn•hr4 Orly nbere, in The opinion of tlm utility,
no undue hand or express will result became of location, maiming bncbh or elhu reasons.
4. Switching Faeilitlau For all night or midnight (Pacific Standard Time) service under the u101ty" standard
specialist; set¢dules, the utility will furnish. otsintsio, and crusts the necessary switching fsdlltier. For other operating
schtelulea the customs shall baseob maintain, and cperate switching facilities so specified by the gtdity and take
metered suttee under Rate 0.
S. Homy of Services Lnder the mdity• standard all night operating schedule appro lessely 4.140 Min of
service per year mil :e burnished, tied under the util lys standard midnight (Pacific Staadud Time) operating sebedde
approximately 2.070 hours of smtca pre year will be furnished.
tererYaA
(7. M illil M Marl failed h
Advice Fatcr No. 4413 Edward A. (gars, Jr. Date Gid June 24, 1977
Decision No. CRmity July 24. 1977
Vice President r , , r,
lerosanwu
YJW
MW
aimY~
r
arils
r.s�.r ,.1
Iy.M
aroiawN
\wr�e
wsy
Weln
WMa
Wrna
Wrm
Wr1M1
...___. 55
58
—
42
44
—
57
__....._ 85
92
103
62
65
73
...._.._. 175
189
202
143
152
164
.__.._ 268
295
327
210
220
251
...._,.,_ 370
405
448
310
325
364
575
620
690
525
558
605
.-_... ._ 800
860
—
755
822
—
1,275
—
—
r x"1w.
Pro. vror
wwn
125
208
292
447
447
753
1,058
wmr
82
140
202
320
ASS
Tool lamp load sball be determined m the count I /10 kw.
3. Maintenance Services Maleseeanee service furnished by the ulgily under Rate C for the limps sped0ed
shall Iodide the followings
A. Renewal of hops after The orletaal Installations by rbt eastomcr.
b. Regvlu!aryecuoa.
m Periodic dozing of globe
d. Iabor of replacing Limps =4 globca.
Innndeacent lamps furnished under this praviriun will be calended semcc lamps only. Mercury vapor lamps and
high perils" Podium nWr lamps furnished under this province will be as specified by the utllny. Globes for raises]
dull be fnni.bcd by I:.e customer. }twin cranes rc nice null he Innn•hr4 Orly nbere, in The opinion of tlm utility,
no undue hand or express will result became of location, maiming bncbh or elhu reasons.
4. Switching Faeilitlau For all night or midnight (Pacific Standard Time) service under the u101ty" standard
specialist; set¢dules, the utility will furnish. otsintsio, and crusts the necessary switching fsdlltier. For other operating
schtelulea the customs shall baseob maintain, and cperate switching facilities so specified by the gtdity and take
metered suttee under Rate 0.
S. Homy of Services Lnder the mdity• standard all night operating schedule appro lessely 4.140 Min of
service per year mil :e burnished, tied under the util lys standard midnight (Pacific Staadud Time) operating sebedde
approximately 2.070 hours of smtca pre year will be furnished.
tererYaA
(7. M illil M Marl failed h
Advice Fatcr No. 4413 Edward A. (gars, Jr. Date Gid June 24, 1977
Decision No. CRmity July 24. 1977
Vice President r , , r,
f s
f
• SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NkON COMPANY RneetJ Cal. P.U.0 Shat Na 4733-E :244 Walnut Grove Avenue
Rosemead, California 91770
r
I I,
Cancelling P.aestl 61. P.U.C. Sheet Na 4476 -E
Schedule No. LS-2
UGHTMG— STREET AND HIGHWAY
CUSTOMER-OWNED INSTALLATION
tcwawedl
SPECIAL CONDITIONS (Continued)
6. ?tmoval of Equipments Where street llghling tertlae and facilities no arched removed by a customer
and such sorice a.d fanhtia, or their equivalent, are ordaM reinslallcd within 36 mmtlu from the date of the order
to remote, the Customer shall Pay to the utility in advance of nleetallatl,n a nonrefundable amount equal to the east
of removal of the prior facilities and the estimated cost of such reinstallation. Uti6ty,atracd facilities Clamored or
Installed remain tic sole property ul the utility.
7. Energy `Jrtailmenl Servlml Where the eunarnrr rtquctu the installation and/or removal of equipment
In order to Cunah n Cray revinuoute, and such request u acceptable to the uLNty. the atdlty will comply with sacs
request provided the customer first scan to pay to utility the estimated cost tastaunt of say additional equipment
regahed and/or the removal test of any egnlpmenl currently instated. Such payments will not be rJnnded and sball be
ridp�aid in sdneee or In Instalimcnu acceptable to utility over a period of out to exceed three years. Facilities installed
with such requests became and Claude the tole property of the utility.
C. Energy Cast Adjustments The nice above are subject to adjmtmeot as provlded for m Pan G of the Pre -
lumnaq Statamml The .nyOcable call" met a/)mtmcat billms factors and full m_n ion balance adjunratnt 6400 +8
factor an forth Ibaein will be applied to the Lahr timers below:
GY pr
Type e/ LMu Ia ltaatS
All Night Mulllple__.._ .. __ ._._ _ 235
All Night Serila .._ _. _ 462
Midnight Multiple. _.... .. 160
.Midnight Series.. _ .__ ..._._ _ _._. ._ ...__ 222
fre er Mu.La ar a A41 turd se Re b alone h 6L /.UJGI
Advice Letter No.429 E(Sur) Com-ard A. St ere, l: Dais 1`40 Ovtahtr G 1976
Ikcfimm No..— -- ravoira Ortega I1. 1976
H E H 0 1 A 11 D U H
DATE: July 14, 1978
IO: City Council /
"OH: Lauren H. Wasserman
OBJ
SECI: John Blayney'a 31 1 g
We are enclosing a copy of John Blayney's east recent billing which indicates
that as a result of the additional work required for the preparation of Plan
04, the City will be approximately $10,000 over its original budget of $77,500
for General Plan preparation. In addition, Jolm has indicated that he is
willing to absorb some cost Increase exceeding $10,000 for prob7ss which
occurred but were not the direct responsibility or fault of he City. —
While John's mono Is self explanatory, we wdnttd to make certain that you
were aware of the coat overruns. I should tell ynu that it is not uncommon
for rontcaets for General Plane to exceed the original coat eatimntes due
primarily to a desire for more extensive work than was ortginnlly contemplated
when the contract was prepared. This matter will be on the City Cauncll
agenda for the July 19 meeting.
cc: Planning Cnairlssion
Jack Lam
LHW /lk
I
7
R�
t 0 4a'rv1 7�y�jy
loin IIL)nr I \.4yIJLT
l d�.m auJ lt. }umal l'iann.r.
\IOLId\ Ih.a.A.l P
July 6, 1970
Mr. Lauren Wasserman
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, C,? 91730
Dear Laurens
The accompanying billing for June work shows that we are now _
$4,511 over the contract maximum of $37,500 for the General Plan.
I£ we had finished (except for attendanro at three more meetings)
by June 20 in accord with the original schedule, our unbilled
costs would have been as follows:
Juno amount over contract maximum $4,511
Additional June Liao needed if Sketch
Plan 44 had been prepared as Proposed
General Plan $4,000
Printing and typeuetting $1,000
$9,511
In addition, we world have attended three meetings at a total
of $1,650, including preparation and travel, bringing the total
overrun to $11,161.
Lack of the accurate land use map which we had expected the
County to prepare has already resulted in about $1,000 in addi-
tional time working from aerial photos, correcting errors, and
field checking We do not believe we should bear this cost.
r Thun our responsibility for underestimating the amount of work
involved amounto to $9,511 + $1,650 - $1.000 a $10,161. We
1 "14.1 \mccl. kun, 7,41
\in l nnay't( \ UM
IJI `I J!1 '71t
• •
Mr. Lauren Wasserman
-2-
July 6, 1978
believe the most equitable arrangement would be for the City to
pay for our total time and direct charges to completion of the
work, less $10,161 however, we recognize that you need to
limit the City's -ibligation.
Of the $8,200 in time chargeu during June, $5,000 is attributable
to Sketch Plan #4 and $1,000 to extra work resulting from lack
of land use data. It will ecst Ls anotner $5,000 to repeat the
work done for Sketch Plan N4 in a form for contribution to the
Proposed General Plan. flow that we have almost two more months
before publication we Lnavoidably will spend more time than we
would have spent to complete the plan in June. we will ask for
and take account of comments by Jack Lam. We will get phone
calls from developers, and we will evaluate development proposals —
Host of this cost will be my time. I estimate 40 hours of my
time (billed at $55 per hour to all cliL ca after July 1) and
about 49 hours spent by others (avardgo hourly rate increase of
5 percent after July 1) -- a total of $3,000. Additional costs
for plan refinement without a good existing land use map will
be another $1,000 (in addition to the $1,000 already spent).
Thus the coats directly attributable to Sketch Plan q4 and the
resulting rescheduling are $9,000 ($5,000 + $3,000 + $1,000).
To summarizes
Original contract maximum: $37,500
Costs attributable to Sketch Plan
#4 and rescheduling $ 91000
Coats duo to inadeq•.ate land use
map (would have been incurred without
rescheduling) $ 1,000
Maximum budget requested: $47,500
Contract overrun to be absorbed by
JBA: 1$ 0,161
F,atimated total cost of work: $57,661
0 0
Mr. Lauren Wasserman -3- July 6, 1978
We therefore request that our contract be amended to set the
maximum at $47,500 or the actual time and direct coats less
$10,161, whichever is less.
I understood you to suggest last week that the payment be adjusted
when the General Plan is complete. This is acceptable to us, b%.t
we would like to have the matter brought to the Council's attention
while it is fresh in their minds.
If there are any questions, I would be glad to discuss them with
you or Jack Lam.
Cordially,
Z� L L L
/ John A. Blayney
JADtcw
Enclosure
u
July 3, 1918
O
0
John lilj)n,7 Awr'Imo
t "I' m vW Itej:" n+l I'l.lnm r•
J.dnt % Ili ono A 1 1'
Rohm (\ bo%a.AI P
Sh.h.IOI % D)OLA I P
City of Rancho Cucamonga
So.- 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730
Attention: Mr. Lauren W,zsorman, City Manager
Professional Services rendered throigh Juno 30, 1978, in accord
with contract dated March 150 1978.
r Prrsonnnl Charaos
John Blayncy 88 hours at $50.00 par hour $ 4,400.00
Margaret Guidzicl 91 hours 0 $10.75 per hour 1,706.25
William 2lebron 87 houra m $24.50 par hour 2.131.50
$ 8,237.75
Directy sts
Production Charges $ 222.91
Bljo P.. int Service 125.29
Travel and subsistence - Airfare and
related expense 345.88
Delivery Charges 5.86
Telephone ___202.02
$ 901.96
TOTAL CHARGES FOR JUNE 1978 $ 9,139.71
Leas Contract Over -Run 4.511.20
TOTAL AMOUNT NOW DUE FOR JUNE 1978 $ 4,628.51
1"Pml Slrrct.%uq, 741
S m un..vu.( \'411a
I Ilil 4:1.1731
nCeL C.iATF, INSURANCE
TOM GRAY
un� aww.nrr m wr rw w.or. u nrn
OC40 ARCHIBALD AVENUE
CUCAMONGA. CALIF. 91730
BUS. 1714) 087,3210
RtS. 1714) 089-0378
July 12. 1978.
ro the City NanaCerl
rhis is my reque3t to be placed on :he agenda at
the next 0eetily of the City Council. - -
PURPOSEI
Request the Council to uLtlxlrav the ap ointrIent of the
present agent to be servicing agent and broker of teeotd
for glue Cross and substitute myself to lieu thereof.
)
r y 7
5.
7c-
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 14, 1978
T0: City Council
PROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
SUBJECT: Blue Cross Insur
An discussed previously by the City Council, the staff Is still Involved
In a minor controversy between two insurance carriers both of whom offered
Identical programs for Blue Cross coverage for the City employees. Unfor-
tunately, the way in which one proposal was prepared resulted In the City
staff forwarding Its recommendation to use Empire Insurance Company as
the broker for our Blue Cross Plan. I have discussed the matter with
Mr Tom Cray, the local agent. who was also competing for the business. .
Tom understands why the City staff made Its recommendation, however, he felt
that the decision should be recended. In order to clarify the Issue, we
have requested and received from Blue Cross a latter indicating that Hugh
HcHichols representing Empire Company is the "broker of record". That should
put [.'e Issue to rest — at least for one year.
You may recall that the only difference between the plan submitted by Mr.
ticNlcho -a and Mr Cray related to the extended benefit coverage. The
proposal at Witted by Empire indicated that 100% coverage would begin
after $4,00 of expense had been Incurred. The proposal submitted by
Mr Cray l- ,dicatVI :hat the same benefit would begin after $5,000 had been
incurred Apparently t;at provision is subject to interpretation and in
effect Is idmt:cal protection for our employees. When Blue Cross prepared
the proposal for Empire, they first deducted the initial $1,000 before
computing the extended benefit coverage resulting In a lessor figures
nhoving on the proposal.
In mmunry, the confusion resulting from the different proposals was the
fault of Blue Cross not the City staff Hopefully the matter has been
resolved, however, we wanted you to be aware that Mr. Cray has contacted
the staff again in an effort to cominre us to change our coverage from
F=plre to him it appears that this would net be possible since Empire
has been named as a "broker of record" If you have any questions, please
contact either we or starry
LhV: lk
cc: Marry Empey
Y
Blue cross 0
ofSDAe Csmmna �Nlv
e
5510 "th Sera Way
Soo Owrvdso. Ca4lans 92401
7ekFhone: 1710 9987211
July 10, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 791
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770
Bear City Council Mmrbersr
i.OWn 7K.y On �Y�S
In regard to your request, I am writing this letter to confirm
your appointmcnt of Mxlh Mc Nichols, a representative of the
Empire Company, as your servleinq broker of record We hold
Mr. M- Nichols' association in the highest regard and trust
that your experience will Justify this same feeling.
Enclosed please find a copy of the signed Service Agreement
contracting your group with Blue Cross effective July 1, 1978.
We look forward to serving you in the future.
Sincerely,
DUZ CW SS OP S0LrrHEFi CALIFORNIA
L
Douglas 7 W11L
Marketing Representative
OJG/sf
APPLICATION FOR GROLI9RVICE AGREEMIENT r n EilueCross r .
e o tw. gM ,
t.'•
(caouPS WITH a — se F_%AP`s), •'•.� •r.° L
R
Pies" sqh both copes of cos loan and nwm them with k+dhidual marM«ahp enroWne,nt kanm.
Application n hereby msde to Blue Cross of Southern Caldumia
for a Group Service A;reement the provisions or hch arc to be
maJa available to an elipble clash, of empbytts, as dcMed be-
low Rand their ebpbk JepeMents des(rinj coverage the+tumler.
The Untkrs,yned. in the event that this if applicable is accepted,
a;rees to make authorized dues deductions for such ekgble em-
ptoym who subscribe to this Scrvke. and substiamty to for•
ward in advance orthe due data d:e total Amtwnt due to Blue Cross
of Sowhem California to ;ether with the nouns ncetatary to roam•
gain accumic and complete membership records. Furthermore, the
UMersigneJ frs to comply with the rcVbiwm of the Scrwce
penauhmj4 taabgnhp requirtments. additbns t0 s•vl deWtons
from the gspup. �•
ry a:
At the time of gin tmplo)ment we shall inform each employer
under a;e 65 that he MJY apply for Blue Cross maobcrship. We
we he,eby esubinhing a probationary period er tt(O (21
=Adds) durin j which a persun must be continuously employed
with our w;miatoo in order to become eligible for ours Blue,
Cron Plan.
r `
It Is our underuanlun It-= (1) new employees under aje 65 who
do not enroll within 30 days fonowing dale of compktiega of a
probationary pctbd. U any. (2) current empbYces, uodcr aje 65.
who do not cA oil at this onjinal tnroUnsnt, aM (3) dependents
under ate 63 or these tmpbyee, who do nog enroll v they 14st
bewaw clipble, oat apply u any time while, this Group Service
Aytement is m video. by furnbhins this Elate Cross Plan tatisfae•
wry evidence; of inturabdny. . 'e,
-- ;, The fallowing information reprding empign rcnormel data n submitted a than a pmptr Lash on which aDPGca•;r
)., tiom for she Service from clipbk employees or this orpAiz^••^^ may be dctnvuned and ses considered foe tnro0aee,t ,
;�• Total Employees 17
y", ••' r Incliybk Empbrica including Pars•Tune. Temporuys those, woAing kit 0
r.
than So hours per week. aM ghost age 63 or more,.
ti.
EBjble Empbytr. ' 17
y "I •' Pankipatins Employees are 30 am over D '•r
r FOR BLUE CROSS USE ONLY `• .,' (,t
Enrollment Accepted [3 ,
Rejected ❑ Date
Cp,mge Effective, BY 14' W,
Cateyry A»ipsalc
MU! CRO53 OF SOUy)tlllk CAllr711Ma r
Pankipating Female Employees 5
'2
DeMnbn or Eligbk Cueprirs: Full time. permanent. under 65
.,
a 1,
••
Definition of Ineligible Categories• Part time. timacirarY. over 65
C'
S,tr _Y
11"ludhng Part•Thesand Temporary Emplayer, lbouworkingias than 30 hours perweek.aadtboss tr
s.c 65 or viiure-)
t
Aaeunt of Employer Comnbniomt • Empbyn 1001 Dependents D
•�
�1�t
Authorited Broker of Record HuOh HCNTehOls
1
f' s•
pr APIPUCA t.D •t, �•1•.
Dated this 26th day of dune 19_]$_` *;,'•
CorporwitNamr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMA
'
�•
'��
Pie,ase, rompkU ail al
We, abwelnlorma0on
l I p
Type of Bul,,,% lu0 nd l aiTLy
County Sdn e nal•�1�
; 4'•
r
ttfars atgrting Agreema•tt
\Siymume_ ���
Titk�flel.9rvrr n, .'
r FOR BLUE CROSS USE ONLY `• .,' (,t
Enrollment Accepted [3 ,
Rejected ❑ Date
Cp,mge Effective, BY 14' W,
Cateyry A»ipsalc
MU! CRO53 OF SOUy)tlllk CAllr711Ma r
0 9
11 E r 0 R A N D U M
DATE: July 17. 1978
TO; City Council o
FROM: Lauren M. Hasse =74— City Manager FF"��
SUBJECT: Organization of Community Advisory Committees
The City Cauncil has requested the staff to prepare a more detailed recommenda-
tion concerning the formation and actual operation of the Community Advisory
Committees which were approved by the Council in Juno The primary purpose
of these three advisory committees in to serve na advisors to the Council on
matters of concern in each of the three geographical areas which comprise the
City of Rancho Cucamonga.
OPC&41ZATION OF ADVISORY CO11HITTEES
It to recommended that each of the three advisory comtttees consist of five
ini t gs,r}clecte�o- two year term The terms should be staggered, so that
initially sox terms will be for one year while the remainder will be for two
years
Because of the heavy demands for staff assistance. Sr Is suggested that all
groups meet together on a monthly basis Mceting locations should be rotated
throughout the City in order to encourage full citizen participation It Is
further suggested that mertings of the Advisory Committees be scheduled to begin
at 4:70 p.m. Thir schedule worked very well with the Schoo' Task Force.
STAFF PARTICIPATION
It is rccoexnded that the City tanager or his designated representative serve
as on "ex- officio" member of the Committee It is. In our view, essential that
a staff representative be in attendance in order to answer questions which may
arise concerning City programs or policies In addition, the staff will be
avallable to work with the Advisory Committees in preparing proposals for
considerations by the City Council.
POTENTIAL AREAS OF INVOLVD*:NT
The City's management team has sprat considerable time discussing the possible
areas of Involvement for the Advisory Committees The following list represents
some of the major policy Issues facing our City which Ely be an appropriate area
Of involvement for our newly created A.,vlsory Committees:
• o
City Council -2- July 13, 1978
POTENTIAL AREAS OF INVOLUXENT — (continued)
1. Planning
Deal" Elewtnt
Architectural Review
Advance Planning
Water Quality Issues
Air Quality Issues
Itphere of Influence
2 Park and Recreation
Regional Park Needs
Hunan Service Neuds - Scalers, Handicapped, etc.
3. Transportation
Preparation of Circulation and Trans rtation Elemo
of General Plan
.-�v
Study of Equestrian Trail Needs
Study of Bikeway Needs `,t7 ;, Q 'f
4 Public Safety
Crime Prevention Programs
Neigi,borhood Alert Programs
Unmet Public Safety Needs
S. Community Corals E
City Nome, Le
City Tdent ty
Community Prowt ion
Historic Preservation
Civic / Communita Town Center
6 Capital Ieproaymint :leads
Establish Priority Program for City's Needs
0 s
City Council -3- July 17, 1978
INFORMATIONAL FLOW
It is extremely important that our Advisory Committees be fully informed re-
garding City programs, priorities and policies Therefore, all members of
the Advisory Committees will receive copies of the agendas for both City
Council and Planning Commission meetings. In addition, excerpts of staff
reports concerning Issues which may affect any of the three geographical areas
of the City will be included with the copies of the agendas. In this manner,
members of the Committees will have an opportunity to review the issues and
the staff reports prior to the meetings of the Planning Commission or City -A
Council. 6l�cfL k+ -IC, apt ac.in.A, occ� .�u%& .t1s'-"-'c.�_ I
�`(f�6t .�:ut�. C_t�.a. �ete.a.tn `rA �,tt..�cJ .+- �R...�..
AREAS OF CONCBR.q 5_��
The City management team is very concerned that the Advisory Committees not
usurp the responsibility and authority of either the Planning Commission q,r -
the City Council. For this reason, we have provided opportunities for members
of the Advisory Committees to keep abreast of current Issues by reviewing
agenda materials on a timely basis. On current Issues - particularly those
relating to land use planning - the comalttee members will have an opportunity
to state their views at the Council or Planning Commission meetings.
If the Advisory Committees are to be workable, A motor commitment of staff
time and financial resources is essential The preparation of agendas and
reports for the Committees will result In added expense to the City as well
as a loss of available staff time. By limiting the number of meetings scheduled
each month, the staff will still have itm to deal with ant only day -to -day
issuva, but, more Importantly, the long-range City policies and programs which
are an essential clement of any successful, well- managed municipality.
The formation of Advisory Committees also requires that certain trade -offs be
rude. The success of the committees is, in our vie.., dependent upon a com-
mitment of staff resources. Staff involver at in committee activities reduces
the time available for both day -to -day and long -term priorities Most other
titles which have utilized advisory committees have also provided a full -time
staff liasion. Rancho Cucamonga cold neither Justify nor afford this luxury.
In addition, it should be noted that there are expenses related to the
formation of Advisory Committees Staff time, although not a "direct, hard
dollar expense" is an indirect expense to the City because staff would be
working on other projects if it were not involved in the Advisory Committee
work Postage, reproduction costa, and other related expenses will also be
absorbed in the current year's operational budget.
It is significant to note that the potential problems are not pointed out merely
to cast a negative view toward the creation of the Advisory Committees Rather,
we want the City Council and the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga to be full -
aware of not only the positive, but also the negative aspects of the Advisory
Committee formulation. The Citj Council my be assured the: the staff will
make every effort to carry out the directive of the City Council :a imple-
ment the Advisory I h Ittec proposal.
• •
Ci.ty Council -4- July 13, 1978
In summary, the role of the Advisory Committees can `,r meaningful to the
City of Rancho tucamonga, particularly, since those committees can provide
i, valuable link •atveen the City Council and the citizens of Rancho
Cucamonga. It is vitally important, however, that the activities of these
groups not undermine or interfere with the responsibilities of either the
Planning Commission or the City Council Those responsibilities have been
clearly designated in the State law, and they cannot be delegated to any
other grcup
U Wtbaa
RESOLUTION I'D 78 -4o
A RESO TION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THPITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA DEVICESAWITHINNTHEHCOITYHOFI RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
4 7J
On mot Councilman , duly seconded by
Councilman �(}t, +LQJJ , and carried, the recomiendatlons of the
San EACnardine County Traffic Committee mooting of Juno 13, 1978,
a Dopy of which is on file in the office of the Clark, City of Rancho
Cucamonga, are approved, and the following resolution is adopted and
order made.
Pursuant to City Ordinance,
To establish Haven Avenue as a through highway from Nilson Avenue
north to the end of maintenance.
To establish Ramona Avenue as a through highway from Foothill
Boulevard north to igth Street, except at Church Street and except at
Base Lino
To establish four -way, otop controls at the intersection of Hillside
Road and Neuman Avenue
PASSED A1:D 1UOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California., by the following
votes �j_ ,, I�1/
AYES, COUNCILHEN, �P j '�" "'""'4)
NOES, COUNCI!jCN,
ABSENT, COUNCILiEN: W
;T
n
f�
CITY OF RANLILU CUCAMiONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JULY 19, 1978
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: BUILDING AMU DEVELOPHEMr PLAN CHECK SERVICES
When the City accepts applications for development, it muat
provide plan check servtces for buildings, tract maps, parcel
maps and public improvement plans The City in not sufficiently
rtaffed to provide these services in -house and will require the
services of architectural and engineering finis. The cost of
these services will be paid by the applicant throuch plan check
fees provided in the City's Comprehensive Fee Ordinance.
Staff proposes to use several Micros fo= the provision of these '
services to allow maximum flexibility and to shorten turn arow.id
time for plan checking.
RECOMMENDATION•
The City Council authorize staff to request proposals and retain
architectural and engineering consulting services for building
and development plan checking.
Re ctfully lubmttted,
JACK LA4, Director
of Coaxunity DevelopCCnt
JL:dm
Fe?
i
C .Iv of San BHMrdlne
COUNTY SURVEYOR PUREWO A MCf
825Eart TAIrd SMt San Barnardlm,CAP2C16 (71411133-101- .J;. wotN[r a-&
- _J(•r wnq twwra
July
10, 1978
�fft'CS:1%
JUL LZ 1918
qX vuWa
LIoyJ
City
B Hubbs
Engineer - City of Rancho Cucamnga
_
�LT ,1v�
9340
Baseline Unit -A
L
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
Dear
Mr. Hubbs:
Please place the following items on the :.;y 19, 1978 agenda for the City CounclL -
meeting:
Tract 9157 - lying east of Carnelian Avenue and south of Base Line.
Subdivider - Kent Land Company
Request City Council to release S5,800 00 to Kent Land Co ,
17881 Sky Park North, Irvine, Ca Certificate from Don
Larder, Engineer, states that all final monuments have been
set and he has been paid In full
1 act 9080 - lying north of Hillside Road and cast of Jasper Street.
Subdivider - Griffin Development Co
Request City Council release 52,000.00 to Griffin Development
Co., 19436 Ventura Blvd , Tarzana, Ca. 91356. Certificate
from James M Madole, Engineer, states that all final monu-
ments have been set and he has been paid In full.
Very truly yours,
EUGENE P ENE
County Surveyor
CLAUDE D TOMLIN50N, Deputy
Land Development Division
CDT /cal
BDaEnT A COVINOiON
fnnry Admnnrarn.OW ^ NANCY F SMITH
jCnINM nFRNAAD.Adln~1W chore.•
PWA Yrml•AV" Iamtst MAYrIELD
r d1l, Anr,cr DNHI II RLL SsAnd Dnu <r
DENNIS I NW ER Onbst
fud DOBEA T0 TOYI NSLND E.Ih
OneNr
(?A
TER - OFFICE MEND _-
DATE July 6, 1978 I * � -�
i.. m'vsn8
FROM JOSEPH P COLLEY, Lind Development Engr.PHONE 2502
Transportation Department
TO LLOYD HUBBS, City Engineet
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT MUTTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUUMONCA
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Council:
TRACT 8958, Release Bonds (Rancho Cucamonga)
Located on the vest side of Hellman Avenue
North of San Bernardino Road
Owner: Coral Investment, Inc.
540 South Pasadena Avenue
Glendora, CA 91740
Performance Bond (Road): $68,000.00 Letter of Credit
Material and Labor Bond (Road): $74,000.00 Letter of Credit
Note: The roads within the above tract were accepted into the
City Street System by the City Council at their meeting of
December 21, 1977.
Note: Since no written evidence of a claim has been presented
to the City Clerk, It is recommended that the above listed
Materiel and Labor Bond be released under provisions of
Section 66499.7, Sub - section (b) of the Subdivision Hap Act.
JOSEPH fC•COLLEY
JPC:JDI:ls
V 1410" en =.,r F(21
I
zl 0
a V1 Y1 Y1 Y1 Vl 1f1 V1 Jl V1 Y1
() H H H H H H H H H H
�I H
t?
U
m
O
w
1 q
� u
J � H
m Tm C w
Z +1 m
Y
U
wz w a fi 1m 0
v di 1 10 H O I H O l H +o I 5 m 1 Iwm tl +w
M m m0
w wu m +
-o
00 c: a um u rMU u 0
w .°
A °
O U C O U o m
S m uH m Y
a co o 00 m m m w u m o .1 m Mu W u �
'
POIU 10 64,$ w
a
w o
on
yy �
F� O C
HHH J 1JJ m JJJJJJ
Vn L N N N MIT N NNf'1 N 1'INN M NNNNNJ
C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
i O H H .IH �D HHH 10 L�Dn H HNn�O H10
O H Yl H U1N N 111 V1V1 N mNH J1 HHHNYIN
U 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
U H H H H H H H H H H w H H H H H H H H H
6 O O O O O O 000 O 4 p 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
u
u
H
M
u
G m
N G
w w F
L`-1 u U M
� y C w u
.w
o u +u+ v m w u u
w 0. w w O
w rl w O M +FI O H y 1�
H T U E
v° m Z Y dam+ � 3 H
> a m w o
Ci Rl W V G G W W
?C�
m1.
s
•
•
Y
u
c
o.
a•
a
o
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
�
m
V
N
r1
r-/
N
N
N
rl
N
�!
N
N
.-/
N
r1
�
•i
O.
O
O
O
N
O
O
N
O
e1
IO
RO
f1
O
d
a�0 /D Imil
m
u
nnn
/G
P1
m
N
t/1
ff
O
�
RO
IO
N
f1
O.
O
C
Cj
NN
t'1
Y1
M
Vl
/•1
N
f1
v.
¢
4
0
L
u
0
a
d
N
N
H
h
\
N
X
O
H
U
J
4
N
U
N
0
U
6
�
M
\
d
<
P
n
d
M
6
U
d
W
9
N
E
d
fR
4
d
O
C.
u
e6
d
u
d
a
N
u
O
U
mmm
d
•.!
T
d
9
d
7
0
O
m
O
Z
.•dN��
m
N
m
N
J
�t
�t
Vl
N
v
�
v
m
N
m
O
.-I VI V\
V1
N
r•1
rl
f!
N
r-1
rI
.-1
.-/
.-1
N
Y1
rl
P
U
N.-1'i
.-I
.-t
.-1
r1
N
e-t
.-1
'1
^1
'1
r•!
r+
.+
rJ
N
4
OOC
O
O
o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
S
O
N
C
u
O
c
.!
o
u
E
d
m
0.'
m
0.
m
t
O
N
d
3ggCc!
O
T
7
F
u
C
C
O
U
+1
V
•./
C
4
d
d
O
N
d
d
d
c
>
6
U
to
c
m
d
d
.+
O
O
d
C
O O
O�
4
W
0
O
u
C
C
to
N
R1
L
,a
uV
In
aui
C
T
N
O
d
N
yOr
F7
i
V
V
r
N
'9
.7
N
y
S
3
P
J
wm
/
U
N
h
N
U
Cf
L
N
h
unj
O
O
O
d
i`t
d
O
h
Y
G
N
tO
N
O
vl
y
y
y
a
�
N
n
m
Y
\
M
u m
N
Y O
N
V
G
Y
.00R
O YL
M
1
a r
m.'a
m
6
r]
O
m
O
O
G
M
C
a
o
F
O L q
F
L7
Q
O_
O
<
F
FO
t
F
O
7
d
n
h
�
�
7
O
Y
u
°
7
m
m
M
u
0
c
0
r'
M
�
O
m
�
L
d
V
q
�
V)
h
N
°
C
FE
a
o
x
U
M
p
m
d
•'
t
�'
o
OTER- OFFICE MEAD
i bATE July 11, 1978
FROM JOSEPH P COLLEY, Land Development Engrg PHONE 2502
Transportation Department
TO LLOYD HUBBS, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
4i4
SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF 7/19/78
This item is forwarded to you for your presentation to the City Councils
TRACT 9585, Accept Roads and Release Bonds (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located at the northwest corner of
Base Line and Haven Avenue.
Owners Thompson Associates Development Corp. -
P O. Boa 771
Cucamnga, CA 9171O
Performance Bond (Water): $29,000.00 Surety
Performance Bond (Sewer)s $25,000.00 Surety
Notes The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plane and it is recomended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
guttor, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs.
TRACT 9151, Release Improvement Securities (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located on the west side of Turner
Avenue North of Foothill Boulevard
Owners R c J Investors
540 S Pasadena Avenue
Glendora, CA 91740
Performance Bond (Natter), $44,000 00 Letter of Credit
Performance Bond (Sewer)t $11,000.00 Letter of Credit
TRACT 9116, Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located at the northwest corner of Hillside
Road and Jasper Street.
Owners Gary G. Miller
21625 E. Maple Springs Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
Note, The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recomended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, Paving and attest signs
- continued -
Ph II,t 7�
July 11, 1978 0
Lloyd Itubbs, City Engineer
•s City of Rancho Cucamonga
Page 2
TRHC' 9287, Accept Roads (City of Rancho Cucamonga)
Located rt the northeast corner of Lemon
Avenue and Carnelian Street.
Ownere Crowell /Leventhal, Inc
1260 w Foothill soulavard
Upland, California 91786
Uote, The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is race mmended
that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb and
gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs
JpC,SM,1s
NAME ROAD AREA MINOR SUBD. NO.
Delbert Q Barbara Amethyst St. Rancho Cucamonga 77 -0449
Stonebraker
A Certificate of Deposit and Agreement form In the amount of $3,500.00 _
In being posted for the convenience of the owner and Is for road
improvements as shown on the above minor subdivision.
It is therefore requested that the Certificate of Deposit and
Agreement be presented to the City Council for acceptance
The original Certificate of Deposit will be retained by the
Transportation Department
Q.
JOSEPH P. COLLEY
LAND DEVELOPHENT ENCINECR
JPCtSZ:pc
I) Iu♦nnw n•. ��
INTER- OFFICE
ME*
DATE
July 11, 1970
FROM
JOSEPH P. COLLEY, Land Dove. Engineer PHONE 2.503
;fu.
Transportation Department
TO
LLOYD HUBBS, City Engineer
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT
HATTERS TO BE PR:SWrED TO THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
NAME ROAD AREA MINOR SUBD. NO.
Delbert Q Barbara Amethyst St. Rancho Cucamonga 77 -0449
Stonebraker
A Certificate of Deposit and Agreement form In the amount of $3,500.00 _
In being posted for the convenience of the owner and Is for road
improvements as shown on the above minor subdivision.
It is therefore requested that the Certificate of Deposit and
Agreement be presented to the City Council for acceptance
The original Certificate of Deposit will be retained by the
Transportation Department
Q.
JOSEPH P. COLLEY
LAND DEVELOPHENT ENCINECR
JPCtSZ:pc
I) Iu♦nnw n•. ��
NAME ROAD AREA PLOT PLAN NO.
Harold W. 4 Industrial lane Rancho Cucamonga 94-88
Donna D. Sears
A Surety Bond am Agreement form in the amount of $8,400 00 is
being posted for the convenience of the owner and is for road -
improvements as shown on the above plot plan.
It is therefore requested that the Surety Bond and Agreement
be presented to the City Council for acceptance
��JOSEPH P COLLET'
LAND DEYLLOPH MT ENGINEER
i
JPC:S2:pc
It•I l{1 000 n., `
WI TER- OFFICE- iMENO
=�
,
iu.
DATE
iuiy ti, L'Ji8
i:r:uoro'
FR01.1
JOSErh 1' COLLEY, Land Dave Engineer PHONE 2302
Transportation Department
TO
LLOYD IIUBOS, City Engineer
�.�
City of Rancho Cucamonga
SUBJECT
;TATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE CITY COMMIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUC%MnNrA
NAME ROAD AREA PLOT PLAN NO.
Harold W. 4 Industrial lane Rancho Cucamonga 94-88
Donna D. Sears
A Surety Bond am Agreement form in the amount of $8,400 00 is
being posted for the convenience of the owner and is for road -
improvements as shown on the above plot plan.
It is therefore requested that the Surety Bond and Agreement
be presented to the City Council for acceptance
��JOSEPH P COLLET'
LAND DEYLLOPH MT ENGINEER
i
JPC:S2:pc
It•I l{1 000 n., `
op
Ned
�S rr
Cttl�nS �: WUC� � ��.L1)o�S `��6CCQ0. • � i
cc�us.e i
�. i
_. - ,��• :.
_6;a:w�agec�' w.� Ue6�ccle
-- rr l� GLUer�t,<
L°UtS-i.S ic�f �'t•. � rHGLr� E . -• • ;
_t S c\ �cycg
�!h2 c -votD� • Z t. ocdei Qvj et.vo(cd
� `�> S � D `'Q• , i't C(, r
._�� 3r -cbt9 io"11ec�v' f21ti .
1 \ t.�t3 in -fi- U Gr1Z f cI r n1 a U�,•�Ql�/
(
W. S c. ueb \.ccl•e. Prising
1.cS �cc cr< <,:wr
WotS �)tcC[S :�o C�j';J�
�Gv�cecl` r1•�� ol,s- yAU,06, by (A-C cc.
C'.t em
.Gt` rn� �,\r-t achrew my�U e krc-le
coc`'ryr��,_.ccLAsirg YA-Q -'ia J
. i�i(�S' � \ I�.iU C V�•k ._V�e.Clf � t.\�l.t� t'v�er1T s• _.
• ���;-- t:�Zs, r(�.� �c��en- l -�`or, �r�ct -1 � -4\trs _
t)
-4a
2: n • a.n rc
I
zo
s
��. jar'. ae. -ar _ ar�d ♦• _ �
K+rF'�%7+71j4r w�.l /IV'�•i��v, ;i�; .. '(:. ail lMSiyi .��'iP'�
� *-
'
,..'''y o..cv' w..0 v�cl_, � 1^r,�� •e ar .Q .e— l• �. , , . _ ,�..
R 01
VXI
ak
- V2h�'c�e O-S discri�cC(
i+.{ YSt. �• ��r11 F�. .�!ri3'i,L>ti'![.F�`k'��..';i�� iY'wJl:,;.'. •.•1: �`e {v �' � ��rY) �'�i�G.'v5).if�+nJn. !�>E>�,�p�]�1 .w'..•,
r.
wtlrAIRS
.-_
FOO OS_l.•l,UTO -sGDY
T
Hob •
' " "' "•
n.
• .YLLK .rn
IA,,
_.I
-•
9 OOTHILL ODUL WAHO
• � „�
,
OUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA 91)30
_
•r -p'
+
PHONE (7141981•4809 i
R. O. No..
ifs
YOaI•U 1
' !•i /� .ice, 1..� ., i.•�
♦
Jl^ J : �J w•r• w
hR
// /�1
/.
••
i11
.— rylrllL
W.LLMVLf AiMXi Tux %��4ed N.
Y'_'J+
:mod /'„,.r
'
11NN
xIdN N. hWN.—
,lN.•w
N Nd
• �.1.:•6.N
_+t_vYz�- �t��4'�• rZt R 9uw E tk i.,��11
-
-
M•.4. CA
1,
r � l••
0' •r
q�
lw�i.+
tlU1N.
•
� � • tDTIMAt[ OF ptpAlR tOD}DY�'lrt� "JiY ' '• ,•\
� luM
bq
T
Hob •
, Pte`
41N.-
n.
• .YLLK .rn
�'•
'11l "i7• .w +i�r 11_
- -l..cj ;! •1.' E[tV6
-.1�
_
/CG
LO•'c
-i
iii /r /S ---
-
_
:'
• +�'
_+t_vYz�- �t��4'�• rZt R 9uw E tk i.,��11
-
-
90
0' •r
V
IA
•
r
� •
, I. � li `l � n" f ' ll�ivlrl:1';.i1f i l' ^.1
...�_
-
;i�
,b1`!P
8 1
�F'i
4�5�4 f
I r • !,LH• � -t 11 ly'u,•• •4r.11 L'�3CL ".r.'_,l. /I�i6U'Mbit
'i -M1
,�iil{1
'•
.TI•
W11
Tin.
- / /n1#,
Pill OL
•
Qr !I v J'a
.•,., �1.,
_. �,� tj y.7 -ry 1rw.vp1.
V
J
tr
1.
.
1
„
,, ,
".L 7 s•Nlir.t, i� /•f��7�'y'yxit.T,Jj:• •1�
„�� :�l,�, :.•
pT'm,
- l` ' < }4'I,i;��V��Pl tlyl?: Vi:.;
-.Va,
L
V
�i
l '�
♦d
C
_•
of" "TOTAL
•yy..
j^
t/'7,
2�11YT
eeqq�yy't,
• '�- .•..I••••.•r1HLi. i • .. ...
II .P•Mn. A, Nni MI..1 lu
Tr
+
� +filly r, rF�h: �i
ii T,S 3 t•U
I S`! I i1 �•
(978
..0
is111� ►.
G - .4 11 • /do
1244� C!'v�C�a�
tta K �•uQ�� °c
�F. ��,• r c9ti P-t� Ceti •w "tGe,ca
C-J 1v /� edi a o L'_ -la OxJ _ icti,
II i C�lt t ti c /,O,"/L QdLL L tt /wit 2 -
L�Ybc/
/ - LvtLLt� z4
[� cto o' f Mao �i
�J+1iL.QC F
�12b- '�d�'14c��i2.GOUI� L"I.LL11 o'L4�
C(�d•et.,. Zr v t(14LE/ 2 /
4,0e -ec dlve �Z�et e cN, , 4 cd
;,,q L�
eNV" 'YLC
7.L'
/ YLe•LLt.L�� ILL..0 /� �
L44ZGked
UK— 'LLCM -r-- CCL . t"tca1-
/j.0'Wt{?
.16-IL AelaA
o- �C-c t wat
//V1�`
ke-
.• I Pxnrry P: and Insur.vx r Comp,ry
rrnem Insucnnce Company
'P.7-7-7.71
IT
INSURANCE
OR
V.1211•—"INLx
1641 1,, yr a Cnu,tny canoe. QVAOm 92668
Teleplto'm 17141 541 4176
July 7, 1978
City of Cucaronro
1540 N. Mountain
Ontario, CA 91762
Re: Claim Department
Pe: Claim Number: 72D 4244
Insured: 11. Cortlro
Accident Mate: ' City of Cucnxon90
Amocnt of Lose: MOM
Pear Centlenen:
A claim has been presented againat this company under the
Provisions of a policy issued to our assured.
Invcutigation of this accident shows you to be the responsible
party.
As subrogee, we are initiatinS our rights to subrugation on
the above captioned natter.
If you carry a policy of insurence for this loss, please
complete the bottom portion end return to us imedistely.
If you are not insrced for this type of lose, please call
the underelpned so as we can snicably settle this mattor
without further action.
Very truly yours,
Deborah Cullen Cummings v
Claims Examiner
YOUR INSURMICE CCHPANYt
ADDRESS:
POLICY 0
CLAIM 0
W wet INNA —�ru al Nllu
w
i.: .
a• Net wAke,. IN.
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC EfV[RA61 LICENSE(5)
1, TYPE(S) OF EICENSE(S)
F1lE NA.
c,
Ia
i }' of Alcoholic beverage Control 1215 Osh eet
Sovom•ma, Carf. 95811 r)I; Il!•ri1LR1)TUO
.uuncl Nenwe awrwwl
The uaderdpmd henbr epplw, lm 'f , r
rc•ma d•mribed at tollo.N
ON OALK iSL'RR k taunn
LIUM20 P1IEMSM
A led unde Sec, 28044Tf
PPl 0'.
ETecnve Dot.,. T"11'1V'1C11
f
FEE NO.
•.. ,{{;
CEOOORA%IIGI - nI
3.,1$
Date r .T!•,L?(
hued
erg. NAMEIS) OF APPUCANT(S)
TempfPemut s
AM
I Effect ;,& tictN ' qr
c
Oexf tLAiale JYSf�
'' "'.F� '" 1' '• •"y ' '''r
7. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONS)
I
FEE
11c u
TYPE
PIZ ,'Sra
e l<ilt•7'e
. wI'
,1P�: xa:oo v`. ,pr v,/}•;,: r; p
449'F. •F•+ •.^- vpnila'rMe
Nn.
e$
.a� rtalw ly
ry R•A
�•.O::e:lt:^nwtin:...lN
' �NL�Tl;�nvnrIan
vq••y;.•,�kr�F' �
`
;�Ak
S. Location of Suunne —Numb. and Sucol
,
E
It. 7157 k3oth)at Ave* '
♦�=p'
i
M spn1W� * +r
' fnbrmCn
I-PC•1
L2
]�J*00
� D
y.
- a Me Premliet Imide Sho. Type of oer* h 2 ' "•(.'.
cry U 't 7 iW
S. Morin Addrm, OF Afa..t ham SI— N..r.,Fu. ..A
9.
Have you ever been camided of felony? 10. Have you eve, vnlated any of the provision, of Ike Alcohol,
11"itage Cantrol Act or regulations of the Dep imm m, per•
no tolning to the Act? ED {•
11. E.Flaln a'YES' ons.e, to Ifem, 9 or (0 en an ana,'Nnent vvhkh thail be deemed pact of this app0mtian.' ! • :J.j;y,
n
KIL- Applkont o3reee (a) that any manager employed in Cn Wle 01ennd prernae, vdll have all the qua0rrcetfon, of o Been", and
(b) shot he will not violate or muu or p.mil to be vbloted any of the prov,sions of the Almhatc fevemae Control Act.
17. STATE OF U11FORNIA County of �ww.. _.�•u °• "w _ _ Dap _• I / / /I¢__ _ -n.
• UN qrW N N.Ir.. wA Ne.w .Ya rk.M. Nwwl
.. seeIW .w mN IM +. W.. W W w.w 1 .r.n.e. r eM .a .........q n. • rM4 wM l N Ir. eM .re ...A W bo. , W wN M
Mw MI .M a .. W . nn0 4MM Mop 4 enEt. n
N N M Ill w , Nr / M rn nIwnn .
�
ervw
r N)Wwn M. wI *•..I w A4LM W.Ir M M se.INwfl w .eel' ✓Y 4,N..., 4 M crM.1 Wx M 4....!,I II .W1, •W NNY.,I.w N .•.N.I
e:, le Ie.I M ernln .eNi..re « rM...1 ewrlw N rw wA r aNrlr M wrra M • Itu• w a MM w M.wa.. e•ar.1 Mr re IAw r.n.r le. '
M. wNIGy M M n• .14A M •rn.lw gelbew h aN r1A M ber..wl w a e4 w nrNW4. wA,..... a r Ir wI mitt N Mrlwn r a
Y M O.e.rn..w ewI aK.w N rrr,rlwwl iN M' M Fwla Neawir me M wMNw AI NM IN..esy,l w M M1w.e ,•IA N I.u1Me la\0ry 4
11. AoPIICANT
f•{ SIGN HERE
'•� " APPLICAT160n Y T�RA ROR "• ;'JIM
r;•
• 115.43TATE OF CALIFORNIA Country of �_____ �.. _ ._ Don
d V.d.r e.aor N N•h. _% Mh, Iw•eI. W ww Ill Ne Y M IY..m r w e.wvNw Wr M M arew.r. 4.nle.,
w• 4 M Ir.•.Y• ..I. eN1ir.11.4 ✓I wM.4.• a M. NAI nwula .N4.•1.w n . Wn. at MI M lw.Ae Ma NeW.M a wnwe..l
, N 4...,w Y M er.trA.1 4.r1r1 La.aa1 MIe. W a .n..lr Ina a M- e,..n W r , h 4ir.r.1 w 1, ww e e 0 N W Men
•.
!y fl lw.a U ...1, lan.ln h wwwM A. A. Mwan M MI M w+Un N/Y.r4n w ww.N nw.lr N N. ,rM a .nl.lr M Nr••wl N e 4r. w a MM
jr4,' w Anrl ^".ei I"'e +re Mr. Nn.r Inl wnNy Min N .4.A IN wwJ.. eNauxN N e4i .M M 0.n w a In w nMr1.A e
,, Mn...e a w Iw r.I miar N rrrerm, r r ,N,M r aln. wn n.6lr N ewlwrl la aw 14 Nw.l.r eNa.eWr. I,sI M ,.Ntyw.. YI yly ly'+
.88148.1 r M Rww tin w nMWa e.wrl a M arewNn.I
Id Nam$s) of lkmw•(I) 17. Iwtwo(I) of Ucmm(q 18. License Nom6 s) eF
Rxf 1Q./EiJ7® 0•
I.7c rT. ' ..w r•. � h
"ir:+w�Te.� T
P"' rix f John re'
'"•4+ ` i
I •, •J
.
i•
,.
.•..,•..,.,Nw a..r...yer. memew plrowr•,ew e.e•aat+ase�A Wtri9yd PR T-ade
Do Not Wfe Beflna TALI Line, For Deportment 1180 Onfg
��l1HHaadedl p Rxvdednotice,
ORi.- Fidudory paper. t� •s (�,.tt ,Iv
.J6C�/ cif :� ❑1� �'_� _ • yyye���'" COPIES MAIIED_
i%�'� If +• mvNr Nf•. �N
•c. •1 ._� -.r t /
n Rsne.ol Pee of Paid at Ofrcn nn
•1717he =�'','
ID
I
r.,,
.'�
�- 't4yvtioyl '
prvlpt Nn TT
J
J
,r
1
J•'
July 5. 1978
City of Rancho Cucaronga
City Council Minutes
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Com-
munity Service Building, 9161 Baseline Rood, Rancho Cucamonga,
on Wednesday, July 5, 1978
The meting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. by Mayor James C.
Ftost.
Present: Council Members Jon D. Hlkels, Michael Palembo, Phillip
D. Schlosser, Mayor pro -tem Charles West, and Mayor James C
Frost.
City Manager, Lauren H. Wasserman, and Interim City Attorney,
Sam Crowe.
APPROVAL OF Minutes of June 21, 1978 were not prepared In time for the
MINUTES igenda.
ANNOUNCE- 1 Neighborhood Block Watch Program - first meeting, July 12
MFIM at the Etivanda School at 7:30 p.m.
2. Sphere of influence meeting of July 12 will be postponed.
3. Schlosser reporting from the recent SANBAG meeting — would
be a California Transportation Commission meeting on July ?7 -28
In Sacramento regarding Route 30.
On July 11 there would be a preliminary meeting for representatives
fro.. titles who wtll be attending the hearings.
Mikels volunteered to give a testimony.
4 Schlosser reporting from SCAG meting -- in the '78 Forecast
the City of Rancho Cucaronga we listed as part of San Bernardino
County.
5. City tanager presented an application form for those desiring
to serve on the Community Advisory Councils.
6. September 13 will be the first public hearing for the General
Plan
PUBLIC HEARING Appeal of Planning Comissioe vlsion of zone variance - W87 -51,
Walter and Gayle White. (Contin.ed from June 21 meeting).
Walter -Gayle
White Appeal Mayor asked if the Council wished to have further public testimony.
None was felt necessary
Motto n: Moved by West, seconded by Palomba to uphold and approve
the Planning Commission's findings and decision to deny the
White's request for zone variance. Tl.c Planning Commission had
made their decision an [latch 22, 1978 based upon:
That the surrounding property owners purchased the properties
with the expectations of minimum ll acres; the concerns and pro-
blems of cesspool and environmental factors; and, based on the
findings that the conditions of section 61 0220(6) have not
been met Motion unanimously carried.
City Council Minute* -2- • duly S, 1978
PUBLIC IIEAkINC An ordinance portatning to tho changing of zones. (Second
Rending).
Ordinance No 31
ORDINANCE NO. 31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONCA, CALIFORNIA,
MENDING THE COUNTY CODE BY ADOPTING
ADDITIONAL LAND USE DISTRICT IMPS AS
PART OF THE OFFICIAL LAND USE PLAN
Ordinance was introduced and title read by Mr. Wasserman.
Motion: loved by Nest, seconded by Palnmbo to waive entire
rendtng aad for adoption of Ordinance No JI !lotion
cnrricd by the following vote
AVE%: Schlosser. Palumbo, West, Front.
NOES: ;tone
ABSTAINED: Ilikels since he owned property in area.
ABSENT: None
EXPANSION Request to expand the number of members of the Planning
OF PLANNING rommlasion from five to seven 'eembers wait nresented by
CO >DI(SSION Nell Ncatlotorn of the Etlwanda Service Club 'flits could
MEMBERSHIP allow for a representative from Etivanda to serve on the
Planning Commission. Hr. Westlotorn again read the
resolution from the Club. vi
The Council felt that members should not be selected by `=""
geographic location Nest expressed that If this - happened,
then other areas such as Red Hill, the.6wrrlor and other
arras would not hive representation The Commission then I
would have to be completeay reorganized.
Nikels expressed that CIIcamcnlgn represented about 472 of
Rancho Cucamonga and only had one representative if the
Planning Commission were expanded to provide for an
Ettwanda representative, then the ('emission would still
be unbalanced lie felt the City Council was not ready to
review the Planning Cnmmisalon nt this tine In order to
ronnlve an unbalanced situation Tl:la would require a
complete restructuring of the Planning Commission.
West felt that the Planning raeisslon had been In existence
only four months which vas too short a time to give a pro-
per evaluation
Palumbo expressed that he did not want to see the City become
"Islands" with representatives from each area.
Schlosser abstained from commenting.
Others speaking were:
firm Racr expressed that Cucamnngn realdcnts were upset —
by the imbalance while Etiwandana felt entirely left out
nnh Stephens
tlnttnn: !loved by Palombo, aeronded by Neat to leave the
planning Commission in its present structure of five members
Milan nnanimoualy carried
TRAFFIC Moonssion was delayed until Ilr Slicing, Interim City Engineer,
COIDIITTEE arrived from San Retnardlno. Council agreed to mava it to
REPORT a later time on the agenda.
City Council Minute -3- S July 5, 1978
AGREEMENT P. recommended agreement with the San Bernardino County
S.B. HEALTH Department of Health Services for mobile hone inspections
SERVICES - was presented by Mr. 9asserman lie explained there would
Mobilchome be no cost Involved for the City Kinds of services
Inspections rendered would be:
*Administering system for issuing permlta
*Conducts routine inspections with respect to installation,
+ maintenance, use and occupancy, safety, waste disposal,
water supply and general sanitation.
*Issue reports and notices prescribing requirements,
renders advice and guidance on correcting unsafe or
unsatisfactory conditions.
*Performs in a consultant capacity on housing matters.
Title of resolution read by Hr Wasserman
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPOINTING
711E SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON-
RENTAL HEALTH TO CNFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF
DIVISION 13. PART 2 1 (CMNMCING WITH SECTION
18200) OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CUDE
F� RELATING TO MOBILEHOHES AND MOBILEN0.4E PARKS.
S1 Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to waive the
cetlre reading and to approve and adopt Resolution No 78 -38.
Motion unanimously carried.
i AGREEMENT Mr. Wasserman introduced the agreement for road maintenance
S ROAD MAINTENANCE for the fiscal year 1978 -79 lie then turned the meting
over to Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer Hr Hubbe explained
tucre was no formal agreement with the County that vent beyond
July 1, although the County had been good enough to continue
serviceu since we did not have the capability to do eo: The
agreement will have the County performing tha same services
as they had been doing in the past It does not provide for
arrest sweeping or tree tri®ing services Hr Hubbs sold
it was a flexible agreement that could be changed as necessary
The City would be billed monthly for services rendered.
� Questions from the audience ware:
Bill Nnsley asked about the street sweeping Mr. Wasserman
said that if we wtr- to get involved in doing street sweeping,
V we would have to find a way to pay for It since the passage
of Proposition 13. We simply would not be able to provide
this service with the tax dollars we would be receiving.
i.
i Mr. Beier asked who[ consideration hid been given to entering
Into a contract with someone else beside the County.
General consenaus was that although there had been problems
with the County, it wan not because of lack of expertise, but
y more a lack of someo..a overseeing the progrem. Hr. Wasserman
C - pointed out that this agreement was with the Transportation
Department which was an excellent department to work with.
Also, the program would be evaluated during the year
Motion: loved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve
and adopt the Read Maintenance Agreement Motion unanimously
carried.
The Council had rc,elved petitions several months pre-
vious regarding these problems. Tile Traffic Committee
Ju G
ow
Nr Wasserman said the City was lonking Into additional
I(ghting for the nighttime, and the Shertf f'9 Department
mould be helping to enforce the speed limits that were
now posted during the school hours
Captain Wickum was asked to respond by the Mayor as to
just whit the Sheriff's Department could do Captain
Wfckum felt that the constant enforcement of the speed
limits would almost elimil:ate the present problems.
Wcat pointed out that foggy mornings were an extto problem
especially at thu Central School Captain Wickum responded
that the Sheriff's Department would do everything possible,
especially on those particular days. -
IL.tion: Moved by Nest, seconded by Schlosser to approve
the Traffic Committee recommendations Motion carried
by tie following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels, West, Frost
NOES: Palumbo
ABSENT: None
J. Location: Haven Avenue, Nilson Avenue north to end
of ma lntenance.
Subject: Extend through highway
Mr Shone explained the extenslrn would benefit the new
subdivisions going in north of Wilson and would provide
for some two -way stops an streets entering the throughway.
llntlon: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mlkels to approve
the Traffic Committee recommandatlnns Motion unanimously
carried.
4 location: Ramna Avenue, Foothill Blvd, north to
19th Street
Subject: Speed limits
The Traffic Committeo recomended that Ramona be esta-
blinhed as a through htghvay from Foothill to 19th Street
except at Church and Baseline
n
r[L^S
f
City Council Ilinutes
-a- July 5, 1978
TRAff IC CD>s11 Er..
Mr Shone, Intorin City Engineer, had arrived to present
REPORT
tie June Il, 1918 Traffic Cnmlttee Report. It was de-
cided to take each item individually.
1. Location: llcllmun Avenue A Sall Scrnardtno Road
Subject: Vi,, obstructlon 6 reavalunta traffic
cortrals.
1
Nation: Roved by Palumbo, seconded by West to approve
t
the recommend it ions of the Traffic Committee that traffic 1
signals were not necessary and that pavement markings
be replaced.
2 Location: Carnelian Elementary School and Central
School
Subject: Additional traffic controls
The Council had rc,elved petitions several months pre-
vious regarding these problems. Tile Traffic Committee
Ju G
ow
Nr Wasserman said the City was lonking Into additional
I(ghting for the nighttime, and the Shertf f'9 Department
mould be helping to enforce the speed limits that were
now posted during the school hours
Captain Wickum was asked to respond by the Mayor as to
just whit the Sheriff's Department could do Captain
Wfckum felt that the constant enforcement of the speed
limits would almost elimil:ate the present problems.
Wcat pointed out that foggy mornings were an extto problem
especially at thu Central School Captain Wickum responded
that the Sheriff's Department would do everything possible,
especially on those particular days. -
IL.tion: Moved by Nest, seconded by Schlosser to approve
the Traffic Committee recommendations Motion carried
by tie following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels, West, Frost
NOES: Palumbo
ABSENT: None
J. Location: Haven Avenue, Nilson Avenue north to end
of ma lntenance.
Subject: Extend through highway
Mr Shone explained the extenslrn would benefit the new
subdivisions going in north of Wilson and would provide
for some two -way stops an streets entering the throughway.
llntlon: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mlkels to approve
the Traffic Committee recommandatlnns Motion unanimously
carried.
4 location: Ramna Avenue, Foothill Blvd, north to
19th Street
Subject: Speed limits
The Traffic Committeo recomended that Ramona be esta-
blinhed as a through htghvay from Foothill to 19th Street
except at Church and Baseline
n
r[L^S
f
r
r
1
- City Council Minutes,
-5- 0 July 5, 1978
The prevent speed limit Is now an unposted 25mph limit Mr.
Shone felt that the present problem was more one of enforce-
ment
fir. 8111 Griffin, a resident on Ramona, reported that i
child had almost been killed, plus his own truck had been
hit
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to post the
speed as 25 mph and to establish gamona as a through highway.
Notion unanimously carried
S location: Jasper Street, Roberds to 19th Street
Subject: Stop signs, caution �lights and speed bumps
The Traffic Committee
fir !bore, a resident on Jasper and one who had circulated
a petition for this study was present. He presented the
problem to the Council.
After some discussion, it was decided to:
1 Continue the enforcement of speed. using the radar unit
2. Post signs of warning of the sharp turn in both
directions.
7. Delav action for 60 days for reevaluation.
fir !bore wanted to be assured this would not be dropped by
the Council The Council reassured him it would be re-
evaluated in sixty days
Notion: Moved by ftikels, seconded ly Schlosser to post
signs of approaching blind curve and to reevaluate the matter
In sixty days Notion unanimously carried.
6. Location: Intersections - particularly at llalms d Devon
Subject: Stop signs.
The Traffic Committee felt there was not enough justification
to establish ild�duioon3l� stop signs at Devon tre t. was dan1 -d. 6VSPN lf�a... 2 Y
fir !oxen said that something had to be done, at least a
"dip warning" sign.
Mikels asked the cost of putting in a sign fir. Shone said
about $80, but that was not the real concern -- putting in
too many sP�p signs around town eventually does not control
speed but becomes an Irritant and often drivers when will
speed between the signs.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to post a dip
s13n on both the cast and vest side of Devon. Motion
unanimously carried.
7. location: Hillside and Hellman
Subject: Additional atop signs
Since the view was partially obstructed when entering Hill-
side, the Committee recommended that the trees be trimmed.
gggaaet- 4or' addit !'orri"atep- aftnn- waad_", - dal e L
`�l�t�ttX.lo+�eD .a.P.t,.pw.�o..i.�e -,_,o � D
- CID; rounrll 'Ilnnt Cs 0 -G- • July 5, i97R
The Clt5 pnglnner and City Mfan.:ger had visited the site
for n pvrsonal nl.gervatfon of Lite problem. It was their
rernmcndatlon that a stop sign should be Installed since
It was a congregating place for school children waiting
(or a school bus
Hr Grl(fln pointed nut lli.ht at Lite southeast corner
where the boa stop was located there could be approxi-
mately tvcnty -five children at tiny one time.
lkmg Hone also emphaslxedt`te danger with so many
children at this corner Ile also pointed nut the real
dnnger was when a junior college student was late for
a class and was speeding to mike clans on time.
Brenda Griffin pointed out this was the only inter-
section on Hellman without a four -way stop
lip t nn: Moved by Hest, seconded by Mlkrls to have
lour -way stop stgnafnstalled at the intersection of
11e11man and Hillside Motion unanimously cnrried.
8 locntlon: Rove Avenue, Eighth to foothill
Subject: Reduce speed limit
the Traffic Committee reviewed the completed speed zone
survey and felt the exlstiur speed of 40 mph was correct,. �7
t us. h xa
-- -`- �--,-�•t ajed Vou, .Afde�t.vtt�.w.canc
Motion: lloved by Millais, seconded by Schlosser to accept
the Traffic Committee's recommendations to deny the
request Motion unanimously carried
RECE,S At 8:55 p.m the Mayor called a recess The meeting
reconvened at 9:15 p.m. with all present.
LO: i fA STRI_I.T (:try Engineer, Lloyd llubbs, presented the requent for -
IMIROVEIIENTS authorization of completion of Lomita Street Improvements.
lie prencnted the plan for Lite corpictlon of the Improve -
mentq at a total cost of $48,000 However. nince the
Cucamonga County Hater District had been Installing sewer
and water lines, they were willing to share costs with the
City In order to make adequate improvements which were
necessary.
!lotion: Moved by Pnlombo, seconded by West to approve
staff recommendat Ions to authorize $27,000 for improvements
on Lomita Street. lotion unanimously carried
TRANSITIONAL Hr llubbs, City Engineer, requested approval from the
PPBLIC WORKS_ City Council of an ngrcemcnt far trnonitlonal public
INSPEC ON
TIS works lnspectlon services This would illov the County
to continue the Issuance and inspec tlou of utility and
enrroacment permits at n Coal of $15.00 per permit for
a period of up to three mntths This will be dune
informally with no official agreement signed
Dr Waaaermhn also pointed out that an agreement had
been reached for the County to condone building fnspeet-
tells .md Issuance of permits until the City had its own
building Inspectors.
Hotfoot lloved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to approve
the proposal for the County to continue the issuance
and Inspections of utlllt and encroachment permits at
a cost of $75 00 per permit for a period of up to three
months Motion unanimously carried
F
n
I
r
r
n
City Council 141mue60
-7- • July 5, 1978
RESOLUTION
Mr
Halley explained to the Council the resolution was
NO. 78 -34
for
the tying up of loose ends since the incorporation
of
the City. The Board of Supervisors had approved this
Heritage Park
project
September 1977.
Mr.
Wasserman read title of resolution
RESOLUTION NO 78 -34
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
THE APPLICATION FOR THE 1976 STATE GRANT
MONIES - HERITAGE PARK PRGJECT
Motion: loved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to valve
entire readingand to approve and adopt Resolution No. 78 -34.
Motion unanimously carried
REQUEST FROM A request had been received from Kingsvay Construction Cn
KINGS4AY CONSTRUCTION to valve conditions requiring Installation of eoundboard
materials At 9th Street and Raker one hundred twenty -five
Waiver of sound home had been built by Kingavay that were experlen -ing
board problems with warranty and ma intenance items. One of the
major problems that currently exist was that eoundboard
Insulation had not been installed in the walls of homes
adjacent to the railroad tracks As an alternative to the
eoundboard, Kingsvay was willing to install double paned
(insulating) windows and add a block wall to help as a buffer
for these home.
Kingsvay Construction was represented by Hr Earl Cohen who
briefly retraced some of the problems they had encountered
with the County.
Jack Lam, Community Development Director, explained the
existing problems in trying to Install the block walls.
Some of the resldents had excavated to such a degree that a
retaining wall would be necessary The wall was to be built
on the western side approxtra tely 400 to 500 feet from the
southerly property line This would include five lots
It was recommended that the wail be installed on just the
western perimeter of the property and that the owners should
repair the slope or put in the necessary retaining wall before
a block wall 1s installed The western perimeter would be
excluding the right of way and easement areas.
Palombo asked if the people had been contacted about the
block wall Wasserman said they had only talked with one at
the present Palombo said the people were confused regarding
the waiver of the eoundboard, why it could not be done, and
felt they should be contacted. Mr Wasserman said he was
willing to send a letter to the residents
Mikels asked why a waiver was being sought?
?It Cohen then explained it was not really sough and gave
a more detailed background to the problem. The original
plan called for eoundboard. When Kingsvay asked the County
what was the spet, they were told an necoustical study needed
to be done Kingsvay had the study done They asked the
Senor Building Inspector from the County regarding this.
lie told them that there was no reason for this requirement
and waived the condition It was rather routine for an
Inspector to give instructions on the job and was never
followed up to get written confirmation of waiver
Ftlty I.mnrtl 'llnnte% -8- July 5. 1978
Question was rafacd ng to how piny trains went by cacti
day Answer was probably about two, but nothing definite
could be o.talned from the railroad
Dr Cohen painted out that thin particular type of sound
board needed to go under the plagtcr and would be inpossible
to mike changes now since thu walls and plaster were all
complete
Myor asked why double paned glass was proposed to be I I
Installed Nr Cohen said they would have the same
effect in reducing sound
Palomho Bald he did not understand wiry one of the residents
has received a check for reimbursement and n request to sign
a waiver .agreement Cohen said only one letter had been
sent to the homeowners and that was regarding the glass
Ile had not signed any checks, therefore, questioned how
this could be.
it was felt by the Council that this should be continued
until the July 19 rooting In order to investigate the issue
of the check and contract for waivering of soundboard.
TAFCO The City stiff requested the Council to again continue the
L \FCO hearing It was scheduled for hearing on July 12,
however, the County had been preparing the reports and
now the city was requesting a postponement until September
in order to prepare reports from the City
The Council felt a letter should be sent to the various
departments of the County Worming them that if any new
developments were received they be forwarded to the City.
I
The Council also felt a letter should he sent to LAFCO '
under the Ilayor's signature requesting n confirmation of -
LAFCO hearing change.
r015FUr a Recommend attendance at State Highway Commission clearing.
EALFI:D_AR
h. Request authorization for Director of Community Services
to fly to Sacramento to finalize '76 Bond Act at a coat
of $150
c flalm for property damages tlina 11 Lyle be referred to
city attorney
d Accept surety bond and agreement for $11,000 - minor
subdivision 78 -0046 by Albert W Davies
e Tract 9115: Release of cash staking deposit of $1,450
to Regency Estates
Tract 9472: Release of cash staking deposit of $2,950
to Chevron Construction Co
f Tract 9083: Accept roadq and relenge performance
bond (water) In the anoint of $27,nnn and performanco
bond (sewer) in the nmuunt of $21,000 to John lieera, Inc.
Tract 8922: Accept roads located at the northwest
corner of Carnelian and Lemon.
Tract 66091 Accept roads and release performance bond
(water) In the amount of $31,OnO and performance bond
(sever) In the amount of $41,000 to Vanguard Builders.
City Council 0lnutes -9- duly S. 1978
CONSENT g Tract 9260: Accept roads and release performance
CALENDAR bond (water) in the amount of $36,0110 and
(continued) performance bond (sever) in the amount of $24,000
to Thompson Associates
h. Alcoholic Beverage License for on -snle beer and
wine by Barley Associates (Straw lint Pizza) at
8:10 19th Street
1. Alcoholic Beverage License for off -sale general
by Petrolane Inc. (Stater Bras) located at 9750 19th
Street.
J. Tract 9396: Accept roads and release bonds located on
the north aide of Church Street between Turner and
Haven
NEW BUSINESS Councilman West brought up the issue of the Charter City.
nc said the Citizen's Charter Advisory Committee wanted
to know what the Council wished for them to do
Diactwslon arose over whether the Connell should keep the
Advisory Committee Intact until the affects of Proposition
13 were known and whether R:ncho Cucamongn would be better
off as a general low city or a charter city. Also, same
of the advantages of the Charter City versus the Advisory
Committees were discussed
It was suggested that once the Advisory Committees were esta-
blished, one of their first nssl Frnents could be to study
our form of governsental structure flikels questioned
rl the fact that one committee was already studying this, should
another one study the same thing.
Those addressing the subject were: -
Bob Stephens
Doug None
Nell wentlotorn
Consrnaus of the Council was to Inve the mayor write firs
Bridge a letter thanking the Comnittec for their work and
explair the Council saw no need for the group to continue
at this time or In the future. Also to have the following
done:
I Cot tho Advisory Councils together as soon as possible -
preferably by August 1.
Ihyor asked if there were any problems with the Safe and
S.Ine Fireworks. Both rite Fire Chief. EoSene Billings; and
Sheriff's Captain, Tom Wlckum, said the only problems
Involved were with the Illegal type that were brought into
the area -- not from the "safe and sane" type fireworks.
I"
June 29, 1978
City or Rancho Cuca.mnga
City Council Minutes
Adjourned llecting
An ajourned meeting of the City Council met on Juae 29, 1978 at 7:00 p.m.
In the Community Service Building at 9161 Baseline Road The meeting
w,s called to order by Mayor James C Frost at 7:06 p m.
Present: Council members Jon M[kels, Phillip Schlosser, Charles Went,
Michael Palombo, Mayor James C. Frost
City Minager, Lauren M. Wanserman; City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; ant
staff member• Jack Lam, Harry Empty, William Holley, James Robinson, and _
Lloyd Hubbs -
An agreement betveon Secondo Colombero and the City of Rancho Cucamonga
was presented to the Council for approval. It provided for improvements
to he completed on thefr property on Etiwanda Avenue at a time in the
future when Etiwanda Avenue would be improved with curb and gutters.
[lotion: Moved by Schlosser, accorded by West to approve the Agreement
Motion unanimously cnrrled
Mr Wasserman presented the 1678-79 Budget. Discussion followed
Motion: Iloved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve and adopt the 1978 -79
Budget for Rancho Cucamonga lotion unanimously carried
The Council adjourned to a special Executive Session at 9:30 p m.
The meeting reconvened at 10:15 p m. with all members of the Council present
hr Wasserman presented Resolution No 78 -37 and read title
RESOLUTION NO 78 -37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FINNCUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SALARY
RANGES AND POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS FOR MNAGiMENT
PERSONNEL AND ALL ETIPLOYEES OF T11E CITY OF RANCHO
CUCATIONGA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1977 -78
Motion: !hied by Vast, seconded by Palomba to approve and adopt Resolution
No. 78 -37. Motten unanimously carried.
City Council Minutes -2- June 29, 1978
AdJournment Mntion: Moved by West, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn the
ameting. Mce.ing adjourned at 11:17 p.m. to regular meeting on July 5, 1978
Respectf�ull "llyy submitted,
I 1. Wasserman
City Clerk
1J87:baa
June 28, 1978
C17Y OF RAN010 NCAlIOAGA
Joint City Council- Plonning Commission
Adjourned Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission
was called to order at 8:00 p m. by Mayor James C Frost and
Chairman, Dorman Rempol
Present: Council members Phillip Schlosser, Jon Iltkels,
Chvrles Best, Michael Palonbo, and Mayor Janes C Frost
ROLL CALL Prescnt: Commissioners Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy, .largo
Garcia, and Chairman Merman Rempel
Absent: Planning Cormissioner Richard Dahl
PURPOSE Planning Commission Chairman Rempel introduced Mr John
Blayncy, the City's Planning Consultant, who presented a summary
of the Aiternative Sketch Plan 04 Mr Blayncy stated that
,alternative Sketvb Plan 44 Is a combination of the various elements
which have been dI`.t'aS3cd at previous public meetings in
addition, Mr Blnyney noted ti.at Sketch Plan 04 includus a number
of suggestions which have hecn rn•sented by •he public unJ have
been discussed in considerable d--tall
Comments concerning the alternatives were offered by:
Mr Tosay Sttphens, San Bernardino County Planning Department
Dr It Anthony, rormer head of the Planning Department, Cal only,
Pomona
Neal Nest +•torn, Ettwanda Sercieu Club
!Lary Farlow, Planning Committee. A in Loma Chamber of Commerce
Louis Parks, 10323 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga.
Ken Ibre, 232 Nest Ramada Court, Rancho Cucamonga.
John Wargo, 7111 Elmhurst, Rancho Cucamonga
Ed Carter, 5823 Layton, Rancho Cucamonga
Jerry Bredlow, 13040 Pinion, R.anchu Cucamonga
Jeff King, 869 Nest 25th Street. Uplard
lomy lbricie, 9436 Balsa Street, Cucamonga
Carol Whalen, L D King, 240 Newport Center
Betty IkNay, 8300 Foothill, Suite 200
John O'Meara, 1215 Nottingham Road, Newport
Ralph Lewis, 924 Nest 9th Street, Upland
ADJOURNI1ENr Ibtioe: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Ilikels to adjourn to
7:60 p.o on Juno 29, 1978 at the County Library.
Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia to adjourn to July 12 at 7 :00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted./
Lauren M. Wasserman /��
Ju:u: 2y, 1978
CITY OF RAMR210 CUCAIIDNGA
City Council Meeting
Adjourned }acting
CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the City Councii was called to order
on June 26, 1978 in the County Library at 919t Baseline Road
at S:SO P.M.
The meeting was tailed to order by Mayor James C Frost. -
ROLL CALL Present: Councit members Phillip Schlosser, Charles Nest,
and Mayor James C. Frost,
City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Interim City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Coaanity Development Director, Jack Lan; Community
Service Director, William Volley; Assistant to City Manager,
Jim Robinson
Absent: Michael Palumbo and .Jan Mkels
PURPOSE The purpose of the meeting was to review the proposed 1978 -79
Program of Service.
ADJOUR.tff.Wf iotion: loved by West, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn the
meeting to 7:00 p.m, on Wedneplay, June 28 at the Co=unity
Service Building
itryor Frost also announced that the public bearing and adoption
of the 1978 -79 Budget was scheduled for City Council review on
Thursday, .rune 29, 1978 at the Rancho Cucamonga Branch Library
at 4:30 p m.
The meeting adjourned at 6 :45 p.m
Resper ully submitted.
Wuren H.�se�rw�n �
i 0
June 22, 1978
CITY OF RANfHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Meeting
CALL TO ORDER An adjourned meeting of the City Council was held at the
County Library Conference Roam at 9191 Baseline Road, Rancho
Cucamonga, on Thursday, June 22, 1978.
The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Council members Jon Hikels, Phillip Schlosser, _
Mayor pro- tem'Charles Vest, and t'ayor Jan.cs C Frost.
City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Jack Lam; Jim Robinson;
Harry Empey; and Lloyd Hubbs.
PURrosE The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the proposed 1978 -79
Program of Service
Mayor Frost suggested that Thursday. June 29, be set for the
public hearing and adoption of the 1978 -79 Program of Service.
The meeting was set for 7:00 p.m. at the Community Service
Building at 9161 Baseline on June 29, 1978
ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by West to adjourn the
meeting Motion u aously carried The meeting adjourned
to Monday, June 26, J. the County Library Conference Room
at 5:00 p m.
Respectfully ssu`bbmii'fttted,,'`��_
Lauren M Wasserman
City Clerk
it
1
r
June 21, 1978
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community
Service, Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on
Wednesday, Juno 21, 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m by Mayor James C
Frost
ROLL CALL Present: Council Members Jon D Mikels, Michael Polombo, Phillip
D Schlosser, Mayor prn-tem Charles West, and Mayor James C. Frost.
City Manager, Lauren M Wasserman, and Assistant Interim City
Attorney, Robert Dougherty.
ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Mayor Frost read a letter from a newly organized group,
"Neighborhood Block Watch Program", would hold Its first meeting
on July II at the Etiwanda School at 7:30 p.m. Purpose of the
group is to help law enforcement agencies In guarding and protect -
Ing school children.
2 Hearing on the Foothill freeway would be held In Sacramento
on July 27 and 28.
3. Request was made to add two additional Items to the agenda
by Mr Wasserman
PUBLIC HEARING An ordinance to Implement the Subdivision Map Act. (Second Reading).
Subdivision Hap - ORDINANCE NO 28 -
Act
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, TO SUPPLEMENT AND
IMPLEMENT THE SUBDIVISION HAP ACT
Mr Wasserman presented the purpose of the ordinance which was
to Implement and supplement the State Subdivision Map Act The
Act sets forth the procedure for processing all subdivisions
within the City Title Was read by Mr Wasserman
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to waive entire
reading Motion unanimously carried.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser for adoption of
Ordinance No. 28 Motion unanimously carried.
Discussion: Mikels commented that no time limits had been estab-
lished (pages 23 and 24 of the revised, draft of Subdivision Hap
Act)
City Attorney responded saying this had been taken out of the
State Subdivision Map Act
Mikels asked if SB -201 was the only other method of transferring
fees or land to a school dlstrict7 Attorney responded, yes
There were no further camiernts.
Motion: The motion unanimously carried
City Council Minutes
PUBLIC HEARING
Fee Ordinance
and Resolution
-2-
•
June 21, 1978
An ordinance and resolution estabtishirg fees for service and
permits
ORDINANCE NO 29
All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
THE ESTAB,.,SHMENT OF FEES BY RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO 78 -25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REESTABLISHING
A COMFREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH FEES
A summary was given by Mr Wasserman the explained that most
all the fees and charges assessed by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga were listed in the one document It was explained
there was a landscaping and maintenance of parkv.ays within the
City. Also, the document provides for a cost-of- living- Increase.
Ordinance title was read by the Mayor
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Schlosser to waive the
entire reading Motion unanimously car led
Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by West to adoot Ordinance
No 2929. Motion unanimously carried.
Resolution title was read by Mayor
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to waive the
entire reading Motion unanimously carried
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser for adoption_ _
of Resolution No. 78 -25.
Discussion: Gary Powell asked If the beautification fee would
eliminate the Weed Abatement program
Mr Wasserman said no. The fees would be used to put In land-
scaping In areas where there were blockwalls and no one was
ma lntolning the parkways Also, a real concern w.-re areas
such as Haven Avenue
Asked what would happen when there are no =to fees coming in?
Mr. Wasserman Bald that perhaps In 15 to 25 years It may be a
ma lntenance monster, however, at the present time It Is a high
priority and hopefully In the future there will be the personnel
to care for this project
What about water shortage?
Mr Wasserman said they were using only types of plants that
were low maintenance which required minimum watering
There was no further discussion.
Motion: Motion unanimously carrieJ
01
J
yr
city council Minutes -3- June 21, 1978
PUBLIC. HEARING
An ordinance to establish School Facility Fees (Second
Reading)
Sct.00l Facility
Fee Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO 30
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
SCHOOL FACILITY FEES.
Title was read by Me Wasserman, who also summarized the
EEEJJJ
Ordinance Ordinance sets a $100 fee for all new development
and $350 fee for mobile home space.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to waive entire
reading Motion unanimously carried
Councilman Mikels commented that the School District had Its
meeting and a decision had nit been made by the Board as to
Its Intent In the sale of the Etlwanda school site
The Issue was raised regarding monies derived from sale of
the school site -- should monies be utilized only In Rancho
Cucamonga?
Mayor Frost asked Councilman Mlckels If these were not rcal'r
two separate Issues, and If he had any objection to the
ordinance passing Mikels said there was a question about
having the fees staying In Rancho Cucamonga since we did
not get a resolution of Intent from the Schocl Board. He
felt this would change the decision where the SB 201 funds
would be spent
Me Dougherty explained that this ordinance would be an
• /')
enabling ordinance, however, the Coticil would not have to go
along with the Chaffey Union High School District decision
without the approval of the City Council 'there was no need
to put a restriction In the ordinance to order to control • -
where the money was spent. If 0e ordinance Is kept unrestric-
tive, then at the time the school district makes Its decision,
the Council can make their decision The City Council is
/
the final authority as to when the funds are released
Councilman West pointed out that If the Council restricts
•
their funds, then the districts needing temporary facilities
would not be able to get them In time for school In the fall
Councilman Schlosser felt the Mayor should send a letter to
the school district expressing concern about the sale of the
Etlwanda property
Notion: Motion unanimously carried
/
PUBLIC HEAPIIIG
Parking and Com-
ORDINANCE NO 27
mercial Vehicles
Ordinance
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE
PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
r4
`r.
y
The Ordlnan -a was continued to July 5 meeting to be reworked
t
City Council Minutes
PUBLIC HEARING
r�
-4- June 21, 1978
ORDINANCE NO 31
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
COUNTY CODE BY ADOPTING ADDITInNAL LAUD USE
DISTRICT MAPS AS PART OF TOE OFFICIAL LAND USE PLAN
Title was rend by Mr Wasserman
Motion: Movea by Palombo, seconded oy West to waive entire
reading, Motion unanimously carried
According to Doug Payne, of the County Planning Staff, the
enabl.ng ordinance should be withhold for one year, therefore,
should be onitted from Ordinance No. 31:
File No. W85-8r - Located at southeast corner of Foothill and
Baker - Index number 4811 -4 (Zone change from A -1 to R-3)
City attorney felt this should be denied or granted
Ordinance was passed on for second reading
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO 32
Urgency Measure AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY LOUNCIL OF THE CITY
for est. various OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIIG
Services and THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES BY RESOLUTION AND
Permits DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
This ordinance needed to be adopted by an t.rgency method in
order to have It in operation by July I since the city will,
at this time, be handling all building, planning, and
Inspections that formerly had been handled by the County
Motion: Moved Ny Palumbo, seconded by West to waive entire' -
reading Motion unanimously carried
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to adopt
Ordinance No 32 Motion Unanimously carried
RECESS At 8:05 p.m. a recess was called by Mayor Frost
The meeting reconvened at 8:20 p m. with all present.
PUBLIC HEARING Appeal of Planning Commission decision - Dental of Zone
Variance W87 -51, Walter and Gale White
Appeal
Walter /Gayle Doug Payne, from the County Planning Department, represented
White the staff On March 22 the Planning Commission had denied
the application for a zone va lance to split a 1) acre
parcel for the purpose of building their own residence,
plus another home for resale
Mr Bruce Lance, attorney, representing the Whites, spoke
He presented the White's reason for applying for zone variance
They felt that, although they were requesting for a lot split
which would be less than the minimum area requirement for the
RI-20,000 zone, (13,300 sq. ft ) the overall density would
not change Or Lance presented slides to show the general
setting of the property in question He pointed out that had
the White's known that the lot size would not have included
easement areas, they could havr built their house closer to
the "wash ". The White's were willing to put in Improvements
of curb, gutters, and pavement.
IF
j
j
City Council Minutes
-s-
June 21, 1978
The Planning Commission had questioned environmental factors
Tha White's had an EIR done with a negative declaration made
R garding thn question about cesspools -- a survey had been
made and the area would handle the NO cesspools
Dan August sp�kO In favor of the development because he
would like to see the Improvements go Into the area.
1 I
Speaking In opposition of the variance:
Doug Ilona
Dave Henderson
Stan Antl,,cer
Gene Cralg
Mr Henry Martinez, a resident on Hidden Farm Roaa, submitted
a petition from those neighbors oppusing the variance He
had three reasons for the opposition
I Opposing the 13,300 square foot size In an area
where It was zoned for 20,000 square feet
2 It would set a precedent for the future.
3 White, a contractor, was aware of the requirements
in the area when he purchased the property and before
he built
Councilman West asked when the property was purchased
Answer: May, 1977 The White's were Informed that the
property should be 20,000 square feet Including easements
In December 1977
!!
A letter from Mr. Fedlnew was submitted to the Council West
If Fedlnew
y
asked Mr was not Involved In a lot split decision
In the past.
Answer: yes
Ttie City Attorney was asked what precedent this would set
If the zone variance were granted The City Attorney said
none
These speaking in favor of the request:
Mr. Machinski
.,
Mr. Bob Luthanskl
'
Dan August -- claimed the same thing happened to him when he
went to the County, that*ar irea of 20,000 square feet
would Include streets Lzt,-r, when he went back, he was
5
Informed it would not Include streets
t
Palombo felt the appeal should be continued until the next
meeting so the Council c.,jld visit the area
t
4
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to continue
hearing at the July 5 meeting Motion unanimously carried
C I
0 0
City Council Minutes -6- June 21, 1978
PUBLIC HEARING Appeal of Planning Commission decision of site plan approval
W96 -73 of a Mobil Oil station at the southwest corner of
Mobil Oil Archibald and Baseline The Plann.ng Commission had denied
Property Invest- the request at Its May 10 meeting (he reasons for denial
ment West wore:
I The site proposed was not adequate in size and shape
to accommodate said use for parking and loading area
2 The site for the proposed use had Inadequate
access as the site relates to streets and highways I
properly desigred as to width and Improvement type to
carry the quantity and kind of traffic generated by the
proposed use.
3 The sign standard has not been met.
4 A serve - station would not be in harmony with the
original concept of the shopping center.
Doug Payne,from the County Planning Department,presented the
background Information on the project He Pointed out the
originai background Information on the project. He pointed
out the original request for this corner was to be a financial
facility
The opponents were: Roger Grable, Attorney, of Rutan and
Tucker, who pointed out the plan was being submitted under
a permitted use The wanted it approved on that basis
Mr E R Fox, Real Estate Department of Mobil 011 Corporation,
spoke regarding parking requirements, landscaping and vent
ever findings of Planning Commission
n
Mr Marshall Wilkinson, Properties Investment West, also I �
addressed the four Planning Commission findings
Mr Chuck Phillips, Country Meats, spoke in favor of the
service station He felt the traffic problem would be taken
care of when traffic signals were Installed at the Intersection.
Mr Wilkinson presented letters from the other tenants In
the shopping center -- all In favor of the station
Mr Mike 21nkln, a resident Iivinq around the corner, spoke
about traffic problems, especially, regarding left -hand
turns
Herman Rempel, Chairman of the Planning Commission, told
the Council that It wa; not Just a gas station being planned,
but also a fast food service would be Included He also
said that the addition of a gas station at this location
would cause considerable amount of congestion within the
shopping area He also sta.ed that at the Planning uommission
meeting there were several of the tenants who were not in
favor of the station
Mr Fox, explained the food service would be "Impluse Items"
only
Question arose regarding the delivery trucks coming Into the '
area during the day which would cause extra problems with
traffic, etc The Council was assured they could make It
a condition that all deliveries would be made at night
which would eliminate trucks during the day They would
also be willing to engage a traffic consultant to make a
traffic study.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mickels to uphold the
Panning Commission's decision and to deny the appeal The
motion was unanimously carried.
city Zouncll Minutes -7- June 21, 1978
REPORT RE. Report regarding creation of Advisory Committees for Alta Loma,
ADVISORY Cucamonga, and Etlwanda This had been proposed by Councilman
COMMITTEE West at a previous meeting and the request was made for the staff
to make suggestions and to bring it back to a Council meeting
for consideration
The Recommendations by the staff were
1. The Advisory Committee be five member Council, appointed
from each of the communities for a two-year term.
J
2 That this be an advisory position to the City Council on
matters relating to land -use planning, transpnrtation and
circulation planning, proposed capital Improvements, are to
review significant budgetary Items
3 Those Interested in serving apply to the City Council
4. Important that an ex- officlo member from the Councll serve
on each of the three advisory groups
Councilman West felt a time schedule < hould be set Mr Wasserman
sold thirty days would be adequate. If this, were approved, the
staff could be ready to start with Advisory Councils in August
He also stated we should try to Involve some that have never
been In City work before.
Councll asked staff to come up with a pl., to Include:
I. How to Implement program
2. Selection of members
3. How to contact staff for service
4 Instructions on duties as to relationship to
U Planning Commission and City Council (Thl, :oust
not take place of the Planning Co,r,sslon)
Regarding the Issue on seeking people to serve, Hr Wassen in
said It was easier to make up an application form which he
would have at the next meeting.
Speaking on the Issue were:
Gene Gralg, President of the Etlwanda Service Club. The
Club passed a resolution which he read
Mr Stan Antlocer, Chairman of Planning Committee of Alta Laro
Chamber of Commerce, said In a combined meeting of the three
local clubs the subject had been discussed He felt the
clubs should handle the matter themselves on an Informal
basis He thought the concept of Advisory Councils was fine,
but felt the Chambers were doing an adequate job finding
out how the comnu-Ity felt and getting the Information back
to the Council.
Mr. David Humphrey, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce,
Presented a resolution
t I REPORT ON Mrs Bridge asked the Council If she might read a letter
JCITIZENS from the Citizens Charter Advisory Committee at this time.
CHARTER Request granted
ADS', SGRY
60MM ITT EE Mr Doug Hone felt tha Council and staff would oat have time
for a program such as Mrs Bridge was recommending at this time.
He felt the Advisory Council was sufficient
Mrs Bridge's letter was received and filed
Item 2 and 3 -- were not com.palible with the General Plan
and should be deferred unt I after the adoptlon of the
General Plan
Item 4 -- Palombo sold It was Intended .o withdraw and re-
submit at a later r .ne S.nce no one was present, It was
referred back to the Plannins Commission to confirm this and a
formal request to be made.
Item 5 -- Be sent to the Planning Commission for consideration
Mr. Dougherty felt all should be sent to the Planning Commission
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to refer all
Items back to the Planning Commission Motion unanimously
carried.
RECESS 10:35 P.M. a recess was called by Mayor Frost
The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p m All members of Council
present
TRANSITION OF During the transition period, the City staff requested Council's
PLANNING FROM backing In not accepting new development appl.cations from
COUNTY TO CITY June 16 to July 17, 1978
City Attorney felt this was Justified The Council asked If
that would be enough time, If August I would not be more i
appropriate 1
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to declare
J—unelli thru August I a period of transition from County
Services to City Services, and therefore, the City would
not be accepting new development applications except to
handle matters already In process Motion unanimously
carried
TRAFFIC SIGNAL Effectiie July I, 1978, the County of San Bernardino will
CONTRACT FISCAL relinquish to the City all responsiblity with regard to
YEAR 1978-79. maintenance of the eight city-owned signalized Intersections
Currently, traffic signal maintenance Is provided by Signal
Maintenance Incorporated for all city -awned signalized
Intersections
It will be necessary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
enter into a contract with Signal Malntonan:e Incorporated
In order that the City have continued, uninterrupted signal
maintenance service for fiscal year 1978 -79 Cost of the
service Is $47.62 per month for the eight owned signalized
Intersections
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the ^
adoption of the contract Motion unanimously carried.
COUNTY ROAD DEPT. Mr John Shone presented an oral status report
BUDGET FISCAL YR.
1977-1— Regarding the traffic signal at Lhaffey College, presented
at a previous meeting, the college was having funding problems
and asked for a postponement.
Report was received and filed
' City Council Minutes
June 21, 1978
ZONE CHANGE
Item 1
-- It was recommended by the staff
that the zone
REQUESTS
change
request be sent back to the Planning Commission
because
a letter had been received by Mr
Rodgers stating
that he
had not been notified of hearing.
Item 2 and 3 -- were not com.palible with the General Plan
and should be deferred unt I after the adoptlon of the
General Plan
Item 4 -- Palombo sold It was Intended .o withdraw and re-
submit at a later r .ne S.nce no one was present, It was
referred back to the Plannins Commission to confirm this and a
formal request to be made.
Item 5 -- Be sent to the Planning Commission for consideration
Mr. Dougherty felt all should be sent to the Planning Commission
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to refer all
Items back to the Planning Commission Motion unanimously
carried.
RECESS 10:35 P.M. a recess was called by Mayor Frost
The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p m All members of Council
present
TRANSITION OF During the transition period, the City staff requested Council's
PLANNING FROM backing In not accepting new development appl.cations from
COUNTY TO CITY June 16 to July 17, 1978
City Attorney felt this was Justified The Council asked If
that would be enough time, If August I would not be more i
appropriate 1
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to declare
J—unelli thru August I a period of transition from County
Services to City Services, and therefore, the City would
not be accepting new development applications except to
handle matters already In process Motion unanimously
carried
TRAFFIC SIGNAL Effectiie July I, 1978, the County of San Bernardino will
CONTRACT FISCAL relinquish to the City all responsiblity with regard to
YEAR 1978-79. maintenance of the eight city-owned signalized Intersections
Currently, traffic signal maintenance Is provided by Signal
Maintenance Incorporated for all city -awned signalized
Intersections
It will be necessary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
enter into a contract with Signal Malntonan:e Incorporated
In order that the City have continued, uninterrupted signal
maintenance service for fiscal year 1978 -79 Cost of the
service Is $47.62 per month for the eight owned signalized
Intersections
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the ^
adoption of the contract Motion unanimously carried.
COUNTY ROAD DEPT. Mr John Shone presented an oral status report
BUDGET FISCAL YR.
1977-1— Regarding the traffic signal at Lhaffey College, presented
at a previous meeting, the college was having funding problems
and asked for a postponement.
Report was received and filed
H
U
,.J
r �
City Council Mlrates -9- June 21, 1978
COMMUNITY BLOCK The staff felt this to be a routine matter since It had already
GRANT been committed and Is ready to break ground
Mr Schlosser felt the Council should have more background
before spading the money Mr Wasserman said in the future
the Council would receive more background, but the Board of
Supervisors had approved this before lncorporitloi
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the
Community Block Grant Motion unanimously carried
EXTENSION OF This Item had been on the consent calendar of June 5, 1978, but
ZONE CHANGE had been removed for discussion
Mr Dougherty said he would recommend not to withhold a zone
change, however, we had no control over this one
Mr Doug Payne said on November 22, 1976, the Board of Super-
visors, at a public hearing, acted to approve a zone change
an the northwest corner of Archibald and 19tn Street from
A -1 -5 to C -I -T The Board further directed that the adoption
of the enabling ordinance be withheld for a r�riod of two and
one half years; one and one -half years for the submittal of
a development plan and uoe year additional In which time
building permits must be Issued and construction started and
diligently pursued to con•plet ion Thn date by which the
applicant must submit s development plan was May 22, 1978
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Schlosser to accept staff
recommendation of a one year extenslen Motion unanimously
carried
TRAFFIC COMMITTEE Mr John Shone presented the Traffic Committee report
REPORT - April
1978 Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adopt staff
recommendations and approve the Traffic Committee Report of
April II, 1978 Motion unanimously carried
PUBLIC WORKS Authorization to recruit a Public Works Inspector at a salary
INSPECTOR In five Increments of $1,250 to $1,520 monthly
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palumbo to approve
the request to recruit a Public Works inspector at a monthly
salary of $1.250 to $1,520 monthly Motion unanimously
carried
ARROWHEAD Recommendation that Mayor Frost be authorized to sign modifications
JUSTICE In the Arro� heal Justice Joint Powers Agreement
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to authorize the
Mayor to carry out the request and sign the modifications
Motion unanimously carried
CONSENT Request approval of the following consent calendar Items:
CALENDAR
a Application for off -sale alcoholic beverage license for
Stater Bros, on 8770 Baseline Road
b Application for on -sale Seer and wine license for Boy G
Fran-s, 8890 Eighth Street
0
U
City Council Minutas -10- Jut., 21, 1978
CONSENT c Approval or bills
CALENDAR
cunt lnucd) d. Request authorization to pay bills through the
remainder of fiscal year 1978, June 30, 1978
o Agreement for payment of Labor 6 Materials - Miner
Subdivision No 77-0713 Bank of Americe,, and Douglas
K Hone have entered Into an agreement to dep(
$26,000 for payment of labor and materials for
minor subdivision '. ' -•0703 Development located
at northwest corne o 19th Street and Carnellan
f Request authorization to attend League of Coliforulc
Citirs Conference regarding Implementation cc Proposi-
tion 3 (In Sacramento early July)
g. Tract 8955: Accept roads located at the southeast
corner of Banyan Street and Jasper Street
It Tract 9083 -4: Accept roads located cast of Hellman
Avenue and north of Arrow Route
1 Tract 9451: Retanse Perfotviance Bond (Water) In the
amount of $20,OCO and Performance Bond (Sewer) In the
amound of $31,000 to Royal Oaks Homes
J. Tract 9245: Release the following Performance Bonds
to Lewis Homes of California;
Water on -site $28,000 (%.rely)
Water off -site $25,000 (surety)
Sewer $22,000 (surety)
k Tract 8892: Accept roads lo,.ated on the east side
of Turn, Avenue north of Effen Street; releose - —
Performance Bond (Water) In the amount of $32,000
and Performance Bond (Sewer) In the amount of $10,000
to Van: 3rd Builders, Inc
, Tract 9176: Accept Final Map, Bonds and exucute
Agreements -- located on the west side of Beryl Street
south of Manzanito Drive -- to R.L Slevers 6 Sons,
Inc.
m. Tract 9449: Release of Cash Staking Deposit of $2,900
to Thompson Associa,us
Tract 9602: Release of Cash Staking Deposit of
$3,950 to Matreyek Homes
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palon. to accept and
approve the Corsent Calendar Items Motion unanimously
carried
NEW BUSINESS I Mayor cro.t said members were needed to serve on tSe
Historical Society of Rancho Cucamonga
Mayor Frost was asked by the Council to get in touch
with Mr Leonard Gorczyca to appoint members temporarily
until the Council gave them an official status
2. Counci Iman Pa ombo said on June 24 the Cho f fey Sheriff's
Department would be graduating, and he would like to see
a resolution of congratulations be sent by the city.
l 1
n
r
n
E
City Council Minutes
ADJOURNMENT
J
L
0
-11-
June 21, 1978
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to send
on acknowledgement by the City. Motion unanimously
carried
3 Letter was read by the Aita Loma Chamher of Commerce
and Etiwanda Service Club recommending a name change for
the City
Hr David Humphrey spoke against a name change, but if
It must come to a vote, It should be at the nett general
election In 1980.
4 Mr Wasserman commented on an Item submitted by the
Etiwanda Service Club In which the Club wanted some
official action taken against graffitti. Mr Wasse.man
pointed out that this would be a difficult to enforce
Request was received and filed
5 A Resolution from the Etiwanda Service Club was
read by Mr Neil Westlotorn
6. Wednesday, June 28, a General Plan meeting would be
held at 7:00 p.m. In the Community Service Building
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to ajourn
the meeting to a budget meeting on June 22, 1978 at
4:30 P.m. at the Library
Meeting adjourned at 11:57 P.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
r A i
4 �
June 7, 1978
CM OF RANC110 CUCAMIONGA
CONMMED MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL - PLANNING COMMISSION
Adjourned Meet Ing
CALL TO ORDER An adjourned combined meeting of the City Council and the
Planning Comisslon met an .Tune 7, 1978 In the County Library
at 9191 Baseline Road
CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:20 p m
ROLL CALL P•esent: Councir members llikels, Schlosser, West
Planning Commissioners Dahl, Jones, Tolstoy, Rempci
Also present was City Manager, Lauren Wasserman
` Absent: James C Frost, Michael Palombo, and Jonc Garcio
PURPOSE It was a general meeting to review General Plan and to solicit
views of citizens re the General Plan
LATE ARRIVAL Planning Commissioner Jorge Garcia arrived at 9:90 p a.
ADJOU%V1:)rr The m -eting was adjourned at 10:30 p m, by the following
motions:
City Coin:[!: Moved by Mikels, seconded) by Schlosser to
adjourn tl'e �,iv Council meeting to Wednesday. June 21, 1978 at 7:00 p m
Planning Commission: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Dahl to
adjourn the Planning Commission meeting to Wednesday, June 14,
1978 at 7:00 p.m.
Re%pectfutly submitted
Wasserman Lauren ft. ��/,�5.,._�