HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/08/02 - Agenda PacketAGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Penular MectlnR
August 2. 1978
1 Call to fndar by Mayor Frost.
2. Pledge of .•.iaglance to the Flag
3, Roll Call: hikels _, Palomoo _, Schlosser _, West _. Frost
4. Approval o• HLnu[t•s: July 19. 1978
S. Announcements
6 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. AN ORDINANCE RESTFICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES. (Second Reading).
The purpose of this Ordinance is to restrict the parking of motor trucks
exceeding lIt tone gross weight or trailers upon say privately owned
property in residential zoues in the City between the hours of 10:00 p m.
and 6 %0 a m. The Ordinance has been submitted to the Sheriff's Depart-
ment for review.
ORDINANCE NO. 35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ItC
CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, RESTgICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL
ZONES
R_ .V ORDINANCE RL;TRICTING PARSING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. (Second Readin
The purpose of is Ordinance: is to restrict any person from parking a
vehicle tpon ary privately u ned property in the City without the consent
of the owner, tenant, or other person entitled to possession of the
property Bectuse of the numerous problems we have encountered with
citizens parklrq vehicles for sale an various parcels within the City,
it 1s the staff's reecamendatinn that the Ordinance be adopted. This
Ordinance has lean reviewed by the Sheriff's Department and approval
is recrmmendcd
ORDINANCE NO 34 A '
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMOt GA, CALIFORMIA, 3ESTRICTING PARKING ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY
C. AN ORDINANCE RESTRICTING aARKING FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES. (Second ReadinHZ.
The purpose of this Ordinance is to eliminate the parking of any motor
trucks or trailers or combinations thereof exceeding the gross Weight of
three tons upon any public street, highway, or alley within the City The
Ordinance further provides that It 1s unlawful for the owner of any motor
truck or trailer or combination exceeding the gross weight of three tons
to allow the vehicle to remain standing on any street, highway, or alley
in the City
The Ordinance does, however, provide that these units may be parked on
public streets, highways, or alleys under the following condition,:
a On designated truck routes for a period of tlme not exceeding one hour
b Wn11e making pickups or deliveries of Sande or morchamilse from or to
any property adjacent to or abutting upon streets or highways which ,
are not designated [fuck routes
When such vehicles parked In connection with an in aid of the performance
n
City Council Agenda -2- August 2, 1978
of a service to or on a property In the block in whicn the vehicle
is parked.
In commorcial zones the City Ergincur may permit by the posting of appropriate
signs, limited parking for motor trucks, trailers or combinntluns exceeding
thu gross vright of three tons where it is datatmined that the prohibition
of parking would be contrary to the public Interest It is significant to
note the provisions of the Ordinance, if adopted by the City Council, shall
not apply in Industrial zones The Shoriff's Department has reviewed the
Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 27
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS
FOR CERTAIN CO`L4ERCIAL VEHICLES 6
D. REVISED ORDINANCE WITH THE EDISON COMPANY. (Second Reading).
The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 16 on March 15, 1978. The purpose
of the Ordinance was to grant to the Southern California Edison Company
a franchise for the construction and use for the transmission and distri-
bution of electricity within the City limits of Rancho Cucamonga. At the
Limo the Ordinance was originally adopted, a section was omitted from the
Ordinance relating to the duty of the Edison Company to relocate facilities
upon change of grade or widening of streets The section should have
been included in the original Ordinance since it is a provision of the
Franchise Act of 1937. The section which van omitted was Subsection 6297
of the Public Utilities Code which reads as follows:
"The grantee shall remove or relocate without expense to the
City any facilities Installed, used and maintained under the
franchise If and when made necessary by any lawful change of
grade, alignment or width of any public street, way, allay. or
place, Including the construction of any subway or viaduct by
the City "
In summary this particular section of the Public Utilities Code clearly
Indicates that the Edison Company has an obligation to relocate any
facility used and maintained under the franchise. Such facility include
those located within public streets, ways, or alleys whether installed
prior to the date of the franchise or at a date thereafter
The City Attorney has reviewed the appropriate sections of the revlsed
Ordinance with the legal counsel representing the Edison Company and has
recommended that the appropriate revisions be made since they are identical
to the wording of Section 6297 of the Public Utilities Code
ORDINANCE NO. 33 1�
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO or
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO 16 AND
GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS04 COMPANY, ITS
SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCIIISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT
AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY
FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND
APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING CO:DRINICATIO11 CIRCUITS NECCSSARY
OR PROPER THEREFORE, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND
UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
City Council Agenoa -3- August 2, 1978
6. PUBLIC RE1RINCS (continued). ..
E. APPEAL OF ZONE CHANCE
Applicant: McCutcnan and Aaeuciates
Padadena
Proposal: Zone change from R -2 to C -2
Location: Nottheast corner of Baker Avenue, north of
Ninth Street, south of Arrow Route
Staff: Jack Lam
Since the appeal was filed, the applicant has requested the appeal to be
withdrawn; therefore, no action is necessary by the City Council
F. APPEAL OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78 -0230
Applicant: Crowell /Levanthol, Inc.
Location; N/E corner of Haven and Jersey Blvd.
Proposal: 1 Vehicle rights dedicated for Haven
2 Interior access shall be redesigned to provlde a 50 -foot
street terminating in a 47 -foot radius cul -de -sac In
lieu of proposed 40 -foot private easement located between
lots 4 through 6 and 7 through 9, a 50 -foot street shall
be relocated between proposed lore 1,2,3 and 4 through 6.
Staff: Jack Lm
C. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
(First Readfn .
An Ordinance had been passed by urgency measures on June 7, 1973 however,
it 1s also necessary to adopt an Ordinance by the regular process.
ORDINANCE NO. 37
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`tONGA,
CALIFORNIA, PERTAINING TO THE PRESERVATION OF TREES ON PRIVATE.
PROPERTY.
H AN ORDINANCE TO A%MM ORDINANCE N0. 19, ADDING DIRECTOR'S REVIEW FOR MULTI-
FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS.
On Hatch 29, 1978, Ordinance No. 19 was passed as an urgency Ordinance which
provided for Director's review for certain business and manufacturing uses
In order to add a clause for Dirertor's review for multi - family developments,
the Ordinance needs to be rescinded and a new Ordinance passed.
ORDINANCE NO. 38
AN ORDINAN OF THE CITY COMM. OF TUE'CIy( OF RANCHO CUCA`fQNCA,
CALIFORNIA, R. SCINDING ORDINANCE NO.19 AND PROVIDING FOR DIRECTOR'S
REVIEN FOR CEP AIN BUSINESS AND.lWWACCURING USES-
City Council Agenda -4- August 2, 1978
7. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS:
A. REQUEST FROM KINGSWAY CONSTRUCTION TO WAIVE SOUNDUOARD REQUIRDIENT.
An oral report will be presented by the City Manager.
6. REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE EQUIPMENT FOR CO}DNNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT.
C. REQUEST -e ROM FOOTHILL FREEWAY ASSOCIATION TO PLACE REFERENDUM MEASURE ON
NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT
To place referendum measure on November's general election ballot, the
Foothill Freeway Assoclutton has requested that all cities along the proposed
corridor for State Route 70 consider placing on the City Council agenda a
referendum measure regarding the future construction of the proposed Freeway.
One of the concerns expressed by the Association is that the local residents
have an opportunity to express their views regarding the need for the Free-
way.
As the City Council to aware, the State Department of Transportation and
particularly the Diructor Adriana GSanturco has taken a position in oppo-
sition to the Foothill Freeway being constructed as planned The primary
reasons for the appoaltion are lack of funds, the fact that Route 30,
according to the Director, is not a "now" need, and that the proposed Free-
way is not a highway of statewide significance since the State has already
built two parallel freeways, Interstate 10 and Route 60, to handle state-
wide travel.
It in the view of the Foothill Freeway Association that the need for the
freeway can be demonstrated. The group is currently working with all cities
to prepare a rebuttal to the Department of Transportation report which was _
submitted to the California Transportation Commission in June but as to
date fine not been considered. In addition, the Association feels that the
firm expression of support in all communities along the corridor is essential
in order to demonstrate to the Governor and to the Director of Transportation
that the Freeway la, In fact, a critical need for our geographical area.
The Association feels that the support of all communities along the corridor
will further demonstrate the concern of our local citizens and the critical
need for the ultimate completion of the Foothill Freewny
RECOIDMENDATION: If the City Council wishes to have the measure placed on
the ballot, the staff should he Instructed to contact the County Registrar
of Voters to make certain the appropriate arrangements are made. There
would bn no significant costs to the City since the Stem would merely be
added to tier existing ballot materials for the November election
D. REQUEST FROM Still BERNAhDTNO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGARDING PLACEI:ENT
OF A REFERENDUM FOR ELDERLY, NANDIrAPPED, MODERATE, A.' LOW INCOME HOUSING
ON THE NOVEMBER GENERAL ELECTION BALLOT
The San Bernardino County Board of Supetvisors has requested time on our
agenda in orde, to make a presentation regarding placement of a referendum
for elderly, handicapped, moderate, and low income housing on the November
general election ballot.
The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has requested that the City
Council consider supporting a ballot measure to allow publicly owned housing
In all or parts of the County The primary purpose of the proposed measure
is to make certain types of federal housing subsidies available to private
developers who may at some point In Ilia future wish to develop in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga
City Council Agenda -5- August 2, 1978
Unless the ballot measure is approved, private developers interested in
building rental units will not be eligible for subsidies by which the federal
government guarantees a level of rent payeants on units rented to lou income
citizens It to elgnlflcaut to note that if the measure is ultimately
npproved In our community, the City Council would still be involved in
making detarminatlona regarding the need for such housing The ballot me-
sure rarely provides the vehicle by which financing would be made available
to developers.
'rho staff from the Office of Community Development will be in the audience
to describe A, greater detail the purpose of the proposed ballot measure.
E. REPORT REGARDING PLACEMENT OF CITY'S BLUE CROSS HEALTH INSURANCE PROCRAN.
A continuation from the July 21, 1978 meeting. An oral report will be
presented by the City Manager
P. POLICY ESTABLISHING HOLIDAY, SICK LEAVE AND VACATION FOR ALL CONTINUOUS
FULL -TIME CITY EMPLOYEES
RECOMMENDATION: It to recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution
No 78 -43 which establishes Holiday, Sick Leave, and Vacation for all
continuous, full -time salaried City employees; and
1 That the City Council establish holidays, sick leave, and vacation
policy.
2, That the hollday,slck leave, and vacation policy be retroactive
to November 22, 1977 so that all employees hired after that date will
not be penalized.
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA`IONGA, CALIFORNIA, F_il'ABLISHING HOLIDAYS, SICK LEAVE,
AND VACATION FOR ALL CONTINUOUS, FULL -TIME SALARIED EMPLOYEES,
G. REPORT REGARDING TIIE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE. An Oral Report will be presented.
H. REPORT RE. PARKWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM. An Oral Report will be presented
I. APPROVAL OF MODIFICATION OF BRIDGE STANDARDS FOR THE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL.
At its meting of March 15, 1978, the City Council approved design standards
for bridges over the Cucamonga Channel and the concept of funding betterments
to these bridges with SB -325 funds At that time, the coat of betterments
were estimated at $499,000.
The staff recently received from the County Flood Control revised estimates
and schedules for the construction of these facilities The revised estimates
have increased the estimated expenditure to approximately 645,000 These
funds are to be deposited with the Flood Control by April, 1979 These
increased estimates have caused the staff to review design standards. Staff
tecommends that tae bridge standards be revised to accomplish the following:
City Council Agenda -6- August 2, 1970
Pro ect
Estimated b.rtinits
1.
Fourth
Street unchanged $
-0-
2
Remove
sidewalk on cast aide of Hallman
20,700
3.
Remove
sidewalk from south aide of Sixth St.
7,000
4.
Remove
all sidewalks from Eighth Street
32,600
5
Remove
sidewalk from south aide of Red Hill Rd
6,700
6.
Reduce
Arrow Highway to two (2) lanes, 32 feet
curb to curb, remove south siduwalk
66,000
7
Ninth
Street unchanged.
-0-
TOTAL $ 133,200
plus 202 overhead 26.640
TOTAL ESILAATED SAVINGS $ 159,840
Sidewalk removals are recommended only in sparsely developed primarily
industrially zoned areas on bridges which are not scheduled for full
development at this time
A RESOLUIION BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR A SPECIAL CENSUS,
RESOLUTION NO. 78-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RSTARLISNING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF THE STATE OY CALIFORNIA AND
TNT. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR A SPECIAL CENSUS.
8 CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS:
9 CONSENT CALENDAR:
TIME FOLLOWING CONSENT CALENDAR ITE15 ARE EXPECTED TO RE ROUTINE AND NON-
CONTROVERSIAL. THEY WILL BE ACTED UPON BY THE COUNCIL AT ONE TIME UITI'OUT
DISCUSSION ANY COUNCIL MEMBER, STAFF MEMBER, OR INT!RESTED PARTY NAY REQUEST
THAT AN ITEM BE REMOVED PRML THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOk .IleR DISCUSSION.
I Request authorization for the City Mwaa6er to attend the Inc rritt,arl City
Management P.asociatlon Annual Conferenu Su Cincinnati. Pundu have b:en in-
cluded in the current year's Program of Service for attendance At this
conference
h. Request authorization for the staff to seek bide and purchase miscellaneous
equipment. Authorisation is requested for the staff to seek bids and
purchase the following items which were approved by the City Council in the
current year's Program of Service.
Broadcast Spreader
Weed sprayer
Five mini- pickup trucks
Office Equipment
c Tract 9397: Release Staking Deposit of $2,000 to Crowell /Leventhal.
Tract 9324: Release Staking Deposit of $3,650 to Griffin Development Co.
City Council Agenda -7- August 2. 1978
9. Consent Calendar (continued)
d. Tract 9320: Request atraut name change from Kintnnita Street to Cottunvood
Way IWqucut by Foothill Fire Dlstrl.t.
Tract 9351: Request street name change from Quartz Avenue to Celastlta
Avenue
Tract 9634s Request street men change from Robordo Strout to Ragancy Way.
Tract 9337
and 9617: Request correction of street nacre — was recorded as Avenida
Casts. Should be Devon Street
Request cast /vast portions of Matterhorn Street be changed
to Chelsea Street. Request by Foothill Fire Distr.ct.
a Claim against the City by Karl and Judy Lobenso®cr be referred to the
City Attorney for handling.
f Approval of Bills.
g Adopt a Resolution approving Parcel Map. Improvement Agreement, and
Improvement Security
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIPOR.NIA,- APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 4499 - -
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MP NO. 4499), 1NPROVEMENr ACREENEAT,
AND IMPRCVEMENT SECURITY.
10. NEV BUSINESS:
a Council
b Audience
11 ADJOURNMENT:
r
r
11
July 19, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
City Council Minutes
ReRular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER
Tim regular meeting of the City Council was held at the
Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho
Cucamonga, en Wednesday, July 19, 1978
The meeting was called to order at 7110 p.m, by Mayor
James C. Frost
Present: Council members Jon 0 Mlkels, t•ichael Palombo.
Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor pro -tem Charcls West, and
'iayor James C. Frost,
City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman, and Interim City
Attorney, Sam Crowe, Community Devclopmer.t Director,
Jack lam, City Engineer, Lloyd Habits, and Finance Director,
Harry Empoy.
APPROVAL OF
Moved by West, sccondtd by Palombo to approve minutes of
MINUTES
June 7, June 21, Junc 27, June 28, and Jul; 5, 1978. Motion
unanimously carried.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
1. Schlosser reported on 'a meeting he, Councilman Mlkels
had attended at the Airport regarding the current status
of the International Airport runway He gave a brief
report
PUBLIC HEARING
lit. Malley, Community Service Director, presented the bark -
ground to the Ordinance by stating that this dealt with -'
Ordinance Nu. 35
the problem -of semi- traflor trucks parking in residential
Ordinance No 34
areas, stopping and starting In early morning hours, creating
Ordinance No. 27
of safety problems by blocking views when parking, care
being set on private property with "for sale" signs, etc
fir Holley then read the entire Ordinance No 35 Mayor
asked fir. Holley to cover all three Ordinances tit one time
since they were related Mr Volley then read Ordinancee
No. 34 and 27 In full.
Discussim:
Mr Mills of Astacla Street, Cucamonga, minter of a trailer
truck in excess of three tons, said he parked [its truck
in his back yard and wanted to know if this would be a problem
under the new Ordinances Mr Wasserman said no because it
was on his otr property
Since there was no motion because the Ordinances were read
In full, they were passed on for second reading and adoption
at the August 2, 1978 meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING
On !larch 15, 1976 Ordinance No. 16 had been passed to
enact a franchise with the Edison Company. However, at
the time, a section was omitted from the Ordinance relating
to the duty of the Edison Company to relocate facilities
upon change of grade or widening of streets Since It is a
provision of the Franchise Action of 1937, it should have
been included Section 6297 of the Publi. Utilities Code
which reads :
"The grantee shall remove or relocate without expense to
the City any facilities inotalled, used and maintained
under the franchise if and when made necessary by any law-
ful change of grade. alignment or width of any public
City Council Minutes
July 19, 1978
Page 2
AMMENDHENT TO
CONTRACT WITH
PLANNI4G CONsuLTANP
FOR GENERAL. PLAN
street, way, alley, or place, including the
construction of any subway or viaduct by the City."
Thts had been reviewed by both our City Attorney and
legal counsel representing the Edison Company
Title was read by Mr
ORDINANCE NO. 33
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING
ORDINANCE NO 16 AND GRANTING TC SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT
AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING
ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AM) ALL PURPOSES, POLES,
WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDINC
COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER
THEREFORE, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND
UNUF.R THE PUBLIC STREETS, NAYS, ALLEYS AND
PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo .a waive
entire reading and to pass ou to August 2 1978 meeting
for adoption. Motion unanimously Cabled
Mr. Wasserman introduced au agreement between Edison
and the City for street lighting services in Rancho
Cucamonga
Mikels asked questions about how Lhe residents of n
tract go about the process of having street lights
Installed when they have beer paid for but not lnatalled
Mr. Lorin Stone of the Edison Company said the City
makes tht decision for the .mount, size and placement
of lights The lnstalla Ian costs are borne by the
Developer Mikels asked what happened after the Developer
moved out .end still no lights? Wasserman said in those
cases the property owner beers the cost and the City pays
for the serva ^es Mikels asked what happens to those
that have paid for installation but do not have them?
Wasserman said to call the City Engineer
A RESOIZTI04 JF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A STREET
LIGHTING AGREEMENT
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to waive entire
reading and to adopt Resolution No. 78 -39 Motion
unanimously carried
Mr. Wasserman explained that because ut the additional work
required on the General Plan -- which was at the request
of the Council -- and because of additional costs
encountered because of inadequate land use information
which was supposed to have been =do available by County
Planning Department, therefore, there were additional
expenses of approximately $20,161 incurred. Mr Blayney,
the consultant, was willing to absorb $10,161 leaving
an additional cost to the City of $10,000.
III
I
j
i
P�.
Al
City Colmell Bmautes
July I9, 190
"•�j
4chioasar asked ahg sR. SS7.i16L amawc. F6r, Ghca'.azams
r
explalued it va+ .,utllwt& Lm John Stuyr.=,va Jawarr of
July 6, Io7-4. Summary of tluc sactfan fCLPeeat
^
"To a,— rim,
Originall contract aaxiamc W,SON
Costa attributable ee Sketcb
?Lan /4 and rvrdu RLTfngr
Costs due to inadequate Iaraf
„
- use ®p (aeuld have been ianaredl
without reschedullnEa- $ rAn
'
Narimrn budget requested; $474w
cancract avarrun to be•
absorbed by S. Biayrmg Esmc. Sttk_twL
Estimated total, war of warts W01661
The request from: BTagug 6• Assoc- arms that the coarrace
be amended to set the maximm at S47.5Ot7 or the wrenai6
time azd d1cuur costs Iris M.M. whizf�r £s ysaw.'"
West asked it therm would Be addiefeaal efrartwer
Vasserman said there: may Be same addde1cmd casts. Bhen
ae have the public hearing input, w raa.Bly cfm not know
how much farmer eerie vil., be regpimf. It vonLd rarMly
depend apon the Council aurt co— naftg.
Nation: fioved by Schlos ar, seen¢ded BIE PjTambw ew
approve the'$10r,000 from :.'Sc• City's muttagney furl far
amendment to the contract vfthx Soft BTaytury ffa Sums.
Nation unanimausly, carried.
HEALTH Briefly, Ur. Wasserman expL.+ined the BaukgrnunOto tBe
IHGJHA.gCE problem. The City sought bids for Bratc b farasasmr for
City employees. Two sera u.asfderedr Hig',b ff-�sLs
from Em ptre Caeyany, im Upland and Ta® Gray (roan Ham Ew
Cueamnsr. dirtrourr. bocIm policies Bare from sire Ceaus
that ware consider- , is appeared to the Clay staff efive
one policy from r=plm appeared to be aomewfi t Battar.
Thus, t u- City pImsd their busLaess atetu Emptre TaeetCaaea
Co. t1r. Crag vas protescing this before the CaursEB.
The two pollclew differed Lm the amounc when the MUzy
would pay IOOZ of the =Sov ixdirxl, Fmptra's puttcy,
said It would pay 90£ until the paymeaes. cancbad $6 AW
then the policy would raimburse ae LTM Kr, Cray's
policy said :.=fits oe I00Z suuld ant takes place matt"
after $5,000 hen btv�< Incurred.
Because cf the discrepancy, West fete, vtefe the curvantiws
of the Council, that thfs shauW gm baeA to me staff for
invescigatte, with the sine Gross reprewencaeive = w 111he
correct Sncerpmtarfon of the paticfes, ahem Brought
back to the nex, meatfig; of tfs Coontffi,
FECESS May" wiled a rece!x u Rcey p.m. amp ratunv ereae6 cc,
6:15 p.m. All were present.
• 0
City Council Minutes
July 19, 1178
Page 4
ADVISORY Mr Wasserman presented a report regarding the Advisory
COMMITTEES Coxmittees A wrlttc.. staff report had been presented
to each Council member. Briefly, eacn of the three
coamlttees would consist of five members each ulth two -
year terms on a rotating basis. They would all meet 1
at the same time, thus cutting down staff time. Suggestion
was to have meetings at 4:30 p.m. -- perhaos rotating
the mooting place.
Ztaff representative to be include would be the City
Tanager or his designate.
Potential areas of involvement were suggented in areas of
Planning, Park and Recreation, Transportation, Public
Safety, Community Coale, Capital Tmprovewnts Reeds.
This list is only suggestive and not complete
DSscusslon followed about the response rram the application
which had been minimal. It was decided that each Coomc11
man appoint a representative from each of the three areas
to nerve. City staff vould send in application form to
everyone who had applied to serve on the Planning Co®isslon.
West hope-' this would also appear In the papers to give It
more publicity.
For a deadline — August 31 vas at with hope! :o announce
members of the Ce mittees on September 6. It we decided
to use a person's zip code as representing the Community
he would be representing. r-M
Schlosser felt there should be some rather strict regula-
tions for members of the Cousoittecs. For example. missing
three consecutive meetings would mean automatic replecemann
KINGSWAY Hr Wasserman requested this item to be continued until
CONSTRUCTION August 16. Request granted.
SPECIAL
Mt rmeev - -- the presentation to hold a special census
CENSUS
for Rancho Cucamonga. It was the only way the State
would agree to our actual population and was needed to
determine the subventions ve would be allowed In order
to have a special census Vw City would have to provide:
City maps, which would have to be mailed to Sacramento
prior to the census; office space; telephones; staffing; etc.
Cost to conduct the census would be $21,000. Benefit: for
example — if the population were at 42,000, it would take
the City approximately one year to recover.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to approve the
special census with funds coming from the contingency
fund. Motion unaalmmusly carried.
t
ESTABLISHING
Mr. Hobbs made the presentation which was a result of chnges
CHANGES IN
made at the July 19, 1978 meting.
TRAFFIC REPORT
Hr. Wasserman read title of Resolution.
RESOLUTION 110. 78-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CGUI1C --L OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUC)UIO.;GA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THROUGH
HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC COTTROI, DEVICES WITHIN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
J
E
City Council Minutes
July 19, 1978
Page 5
Motions Moved by Mikes], seconded b Schlosser to adopt
Resolution No. 78 -40 lotion una,dmously carried.
ADDITIO:V_L hr. Wasserman made o presentation to the Council of
SPACE leasing a thirty -foot mobile office building for the need
U 1it1:M1:Nt -f additional dpduu dL city udll for ow Coomdnity Dcvcicp
went Department.
After some diecussion, Schlosser felt he wanted to look at
' the present set up before approval. This was the consensus
of the Council, and for staff to bring the request back
at the next meeting.
CITY ATTORNEY Because of the backlog of work from the County in the area
REFORTS of Planning, the City Attorney presented an Ordinance
establishing a moratorl m. It would not affect industrial,
e,xtaerelal, minor home imporvements and additions.
Mr. Lam pointed out that there were Imo -ed many building
applications of all types backlogged from the County. Each
on¢ was like a new application to .he City planners, and
thus, were requiring a great deal of time in order to do
a good job. There was also the problem of trying to set
up a program for the community, records nyst¢ms, etc.
Doug None spoke from the audience confirming that the files
rm some of his projects were not correct with many
inconsistencies. Ile did not see hoe the City staff could
fr handle the backlog without taking suee action of this type
The City Attorney reported he had reviewed twelve file
himself and 10 four of them found conflicting Information.
Hatton: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to approve
Ordinance No. 16 as an urgency Ordinance.
Mikels felt that the Ordinance should contain a section for
Cnuncll's review of the status. Wasserman said instead of
showing this in the Ordinance, the staff would give Council
monthly reports. Council felt every six weeks was adequat.
Schlosser felt that an addition should be made to the
Ordinance to include those who desired to build a single
family home could do no. Mr. lam felt the City could handle
these without any problems. Therefore, Mr Lam and the
City Atton.ey went aside to write the section to be inserted.
CORSLtiT The following consent calendar items were presented.
CALENDAR
a Building ant Development Plan Check Services - request
free the Conwmfty Development Department.
Is. Tract 9157: Release Bonds in the amount of $5,800 to
Rent Land Co.
Tract 9080: Release M,ds In the amount of 52.000 to
Criggin Development Co.
City Council Minutes
July 19, 1978
Page 6
c Tract 8958: Release rerformance Bond (Road) In
the amount of $68,000 and Itaterial and Labor Bond
(Road) in the amount of $14,on0 to Coral Investment
Inc. If�I
d Approval of Dills.
a Tract 9585: Accept roads and Release Performance
Bond (Water) in the amount of $29,000 and
Performance Bond (Sewer) in rile amount of $250000
to Thompson Associates Development Corp.
Tract 9153: Release Perfurmance Bond (Water) In
the amount of $44,000 and Performance Bond (Sever)
in the amount of $33,000 to R 6 J Investors.
Tract 9116: Accept roads located at the northwest
corner of Hillside Road and Jasper Street - owner,
(;sty Miller
Tract 9287: Accept Ronda locnteJ at the northeast
corner of Loma- Avenue And Carnelian Street -
owner Crowell /Leventhal, Inc
f. Accept Certificate of Deposit and Agreement of
$3,500 by Delbert 6 Barbara Stonebraker
g Accapt Surety Bond and Agreement In the amount of
$8,400 by Harold 6 Donna Sears ,..�
h. Refer claim by Pamela J Wilson against the City I
to City Attorney for handling.
I. Refer claia by M. Cortizo against the City to
City Attorney for handling
J. Alcoholic beverage on -sale boor and wine application
for David Camou for Ernia's at 7157 Amethyst Avenue
Motion: Moved by Palombo, aeconded y Schlosser to
approve tha Consent Calendar it -m. ?lotion unanimously
carried.
NEW BUSINESS 1. (lest asked about the weed L.can up around the
city Mr. Wasserman said we would be making a
comprehensive report at the August 2 meeting.
2. Meeting with Dr Smith, Leonard Corczyca regarding
the Historical meeting in the City offices on Monday
evening, July 24. Mikels said he would also be
present.
Mr Walter Scavanl was present to mate a plea to ^
the Council regarding a water line broken by an
cln tree which was on City property. Discussion i
ful lowed
Motion: ?loved by Mikels, seconded by Went to
refer back Lo the City staff for investigation.
Motion unanimously carried
RECCSS Mayor called a recess at 9:45 p.m. and at 10:00 the
meeting reconvened. All were present
I
s
0
City Council Hinutos
July 19, 1978
Page 7
CITY ATTORNEY The City Attorney lead elation wh1Ae ho had drafted at
REPORT the Council's request for addition to Ordtnance No. 16
Paragraph 7C is as follows:
(continuation)
"A residential subdivision, residential land division,
parcel map or building permit where only one new
rusidential dwelling can result This exemption shall
be on a one -time basis only This oxemption shall be
suhjcct to the approval of the Community Development
Director prior to the luauunca of any building permit "
Notion: Moved by Nest, saconded by Palombo to adopt
Ordinance No. Jf as an urgency Ordinance with the
addition of Section 7C. Notion unanimously carried.
ADJOURN14ENT !lotion: Moved by Nest, sccom:cd by Palombo to adjourn
Motion unanimously carried Meeting adjourned at
10:05 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 35
AN ORDINANCE OF TILE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, RESTRICTING PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali-
fornia, does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: It shall be unlawful for any person to park,
or causo to Ec packed, any motor truck, trailer or combi-- *Son
thereof, exceeding a gross weight of ono - and - one -half (1 -1/2)
tons, upon any privately -owned property in a residential zone
in the City between the hours of )0:00 p.m, on one day and
6:00 a.m. on the following day.
SECTION 2: All words and phrases used in this ordinance
which are de ned in the Vehicle Code of the State of California
shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance as they have In
the Vehicle Code.
1978. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
City Cler
Mayor of the C.ty o
Rancho Cucamonga
I
s •
ORDINANCE NO 34
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, RESTRICTING PARRING ON PRIVATd PROPERTY.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: It shall be unlawful for any person to park, or
cause 1:6 be parked, any vehicle upon any privately owned property
in the City without the consent of the owner, tenant, or other per-
son entitled to Possesnion of such property.
SECTION 2: For the purposes of this Ordinance there shall
be a presumpi on of lack of consent when all of the following con-
ditions exist:
the owner, tenant oraotherepersonlentitled tonPossessioneofetheo
property
combination thereof. (b) The vehicle is a motor truck, trailer, or
more than one (1) consecuttvee hour ebetweenk the hour: of 10:00 p.m.
on one dal. and 6:00 a.m. on tl:e following day.
which areCTeONned in words and Codesof this Ordinance California
shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance as they have in the
Vehicle Code.
1978. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
C ty Clark
mayor of t o C ty of
Rancho Cucamonga
r.
.,
• i
ORDINANCE NO 27
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, ESTABLISHINy PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR CER-
TAIN COMMERCIAL VrHICLES.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Except as provided for herein:
(a) It shall be unlawful for
park any motor truck or trailer, or combination thereo f, s
f,exceeding
a gross weight of three (3) tons upon any public street,
highway or alley within the City
(b) It shall be motor truck or trailer, or co unlawful mbination thereof, exceeding £ an
a y -
weight of three (3) tons to allow such vehicle to remain standing
upon any street, highway or alley in th City.
SECTION 2: Motor trucks or trailers, or combinations there-
of, exceu nig u gross weigh: of three (3) tons may be parked on
public streets, highways or alloys as follows:
(a) On designated truck routes for a period of
time not exceeding one (1) hour.
goods, wares or merchaa disl
efromkor9toianyppropertyiadjacentfto
or abutting upon streets or highways which are not designated truck
routes
(c) When such vehicle is parked in connection
with and in aid of the performance of a service to or on - property
in the block in which such vehicle is parked.
SECTION 3: In commercial zones, the City Engineer may per-
mit, by t10 posting of appropriate signs, limited parkin. for motor
trucks, trailers or combinations thereof exceeding a grusa weight
of three (3) tons where it is datarmined that to prohibit such
parking is contrary to the public interest.
SECTION 4: The provisions of this Ordinance shall not ap-
ply in industrial zones
SECTION 5: All words and phrt:ses used in this Ordinance
which are o ned in the Vehicle Code of the State of California
shall have the same meaning in this Ordinance as they have in the
Vehicle Code
-1- .
S
i
i 0
1978. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of
ATTEST:
C ty C er
-2-
Mayor o£ t e C ty of
Rancho Cucamonga
ORDINANCE NO 33
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECINDING
ORDINANCE NO 16 AND GRANTING TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS,A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT
AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING
ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES,
WIRES, CONDUITS AND A?PURTENANCES, INCLUDING
COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER
THEREFORE, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND
UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES
WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
does ordain as follows:
Section 1: Whenever In this Ordinance the words or
Phrases hereinafter in this .section defined are used, It is
Intended that they shall have the respective meanings assigned
to them in the following definitions (unless, in the given
instance, the context wherein they are used shall clearly
Import a different meaning):
(a) The word "grantee" shall mean the corpo-
ration to which the franchise contemplated in this
Ordinance Is granted and its lawful Auccessors or
assigns,
(h) The word "City" shall mean the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, a municioal corporation of the
State of California, in Its present Incorporated
form or in any later reorganised, consolidated,
enlarg ^d or reincorporated form;
(c) The word "streets" shall mean the public
streets, wnvs, alleyn and places as the same now
or may hereafter exist within said City;
(d) The phrase "poles, wires, conduits and
appurtenances" shall mean poles, towers, supports
wires, conductors, cables, guys, stubs, platforms,
urossarms, braces, transformers, Insulators, con -
dults, ducts, vaults, manholes, maters, cut -outs,
swi -ches, communicntion circulta, appliances,
att.ichments, appurtenances and any other property
ov r or under the streets of said City, and used
xr ��
{Y
4 i
or useful, directly or Indirectly, for the purpose
of transmitting or distributing electricity;
(e) The phrase "construct and use" shall mean
to lay, construct, erect, install, operate, maintain,
use, repair, replace or relocate.
Section 2: The franchise to use and to construct
and use, for tranamitting and distributing electricity for any
and all purposes, poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances,
Including communication circuits, necessary or proper therefor,
In, along, across, upon, over and under the streets within the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby granted to Southern California
Edison Company, its lawful succcscora and assigns, under and In
accordance with the provisions of the Franchise Act of 1917.
Section 3: Said franchise shall be indeterminate,
that is to say, said franchise shall endure S,t full force and
effect until, with the consent of the Public Utilities Commis-
sion of the State of California, the same shall be voluntarily
surrendered or abandoned by the grantee, or until the State or
some municipal or public corporation thereunto duly authorized
by law shall purchase by voluntary agreement or shall condemn
and take under the power of eminent domain, all property actu-
ally used and useful in the exercise of said rrarchtce and
situate within the territorial limits of the state, municipal
or public corporation purchasing or condemning, such property,
or until said franchise shall be forfeited for noncompliance
with its terms by the grantee.
Section A: The grantee of said franchise, during
the life thereof', will pay to sold City two percent (2f) or
the gross annual receipts of said grantee ':king from the use,
opcbatlon or possession of said franchise; provldtd, however,
that su ^h payment shall 11 no event be less that one percent
(1R) of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the
sale of electricity within the limits of said City
Section 5: The grantee shall file with the City Clerk
or said City, within three (3) months after the expiration of
the calendar year, or fractional calendar year, following the
date or the grant ing of this franchise, and W1 thin three (3)
months after thr expiration of cacti calendar year thereafter,
a vcrlfied statement allowing to detail the total Bross receipts
of said grantee derived during the preceding calendar year, or
such fractional calendar year, from the sale of electricity
within the limits of said City The rrantee shall pay to said
City within fifteen (15) days after the time rlr riling said
statement, In lawful money of the United States, the aforesaid
- ' -
0
percentage of its gross receipts for the calendar year, or
fractional calendar year, covered by said statement Any
neglect, omission or refusal by said grantee to file said
verified statemert, or to pay said rercentage at the times
or in the manner hereinbefore provided, shall constitute grounds
for the declaration of a forfeiture of this franchise and of
all rights of grantee hereunder.
Section 6: This Ordinance shall become effective
thirty (30) ayder its final passage, unless suspended
by referendum petition filed as provided by law
Section 7: The grantee of this franchise shall
pay to the City a sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for
all publication expenses incurred by it in connection with
the granting this franchise; said payment to be made within
thirty (30) days after the City shall have furnished said
grantee with a written statement of such expenses
bection 8: The franchise granted hereby shall not
become effect ve unt 1 written acceptance thereof shall have
been filed by the grantee with the City Clerk of said City.
Section 9: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance
to be posted w th n fifteen (15) days after its passage in
three (3) public places within said City
Section 10 The grantee shall remove or relocate
without expense to t e City any facilities installed, used and
maintained under the franchise if and when made necessary by any
lawful change of grade, alignment or width of any public street,
way, alley, or place, including the construction of any subway
or viaduct by the City
Section 11: This ordinance recinds Ordinance No
16
First read at a regular meeting of the City Council
of said City held on the day of 1978, and
finally adopted and ordere2 posted at a regarmeeting of the -
City Council held on the day of 1978, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
ATTEST:
City er
Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
4'
J •
rN0INCER1116
PLANNING 12721 705.3762
eURVCYINO 12727 667.2272
MCCUTCHAN & ASSOCIATES, INC-
2100 CA5T FOOTHILL eOULCVARU . ►A6ADCNA. CAt.1►077V7A 61107
Our ref: 166 -0101
July 26, 1978
JUL 271978
CffOF IV=
CrAIMM
Mr Jack Lamb -14-=__
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject: Zone Change No. 85 -86
Appeal to the City Council
Gentlemen:
heroby --equost withdrawal of my appeal on the subject zone change.
With this withdrawal, *his matter will not be on the City Council
Agenda of August 2, 1978,
Sincerely,
MCCUTQH N b A �OCIATES, INC.
/ )
Tho ,1"v,�cCutchan
TOM /j
MY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
DATE: JULY 28, 1978
TO: CITi COUNCIL
I=1: JACK LAN, DIRECTOR OF COMINITY DEVEIAPNENi
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF ZONE MANGE ND 85 -86 - AC CUCILM AND ASSOCIATES
The appeal of Zone Change No. 85 -86 was scheduled as a public hearing before
the City Council. However, since the appeal was filed, the applicant has
requested the appeal be withdrawn; therefore, no action Is necessary by
the City Cnencil.
ResiectfI!y submitted,
JACX LAN. Director bf—�
Co xunity Deveiopuent
JL:da
• A-t'd' -
C
RANC[
CUCAMONGA
May 19, 1978
McCutchan G Asiociates, Inc
2100 East Foothill Boulevard
Pasadena, California 91107
Gentlemen:
The City Council of the City of_Rancho Cucamonga has set Wednesday, August
2, 1978, as the date for the appeal hearing concerning the Planning
Commission's denial of your zone change request on the property located
at the nor Uua,t corner of Baker Avenue and north of Ninth Street and
south of Arrow Route
The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 p.m The location of the meeting
Is at the Community Services Building at 9161 Baseline Road. If you have
any further questions, please contact me
Sincerely,
�t
City Manager
LMW:baa
I'(KT0FF1('F 11037-11 pAMrlin t9 M, \WnlUL\. l'AI 110UN1A'11710 (71.11 f)RIO IRSI
Y�
I, LA NCERINO
PLANNING 121]1 6813 6172
9URyCY1N0 (279) 8812]6]
M C C U T C H A N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C.
2100 CAST FOOTHILL DOULEVARO . PASADENA CALIFORNIA 81107
Our Ref: 166 -0101
May 10. 1978
City Clerk
Rancho Cucamonga
9360 Baseline Road, Unit "A"
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Subject: :one Change - Index No N85 -86
Gentlemen:
Enclosed, in triplicate,is our appeal of the subject zone change denial
Also enclosed is our check in the amount of 900 for the appeal fee.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate in contacting this office.
Sincerely,
/b
Encls.
• �7' (t-} (Il ?CL1et�
Arpw
or
TIIF: CdtYtFi,� A RtBDILfO from
nctlon by COUNTY PIANNING MMISSION
DATE: May 10, 1978 INDEX 110: W85.86
APPELLANT'S NAVE: HcCutchan 6 Associates, Inc
Aw)n,riS 2100 Enat Foothill Boulevard
Pasadena, Calif. 91107 (217)795 -5162
DATE OF PLANNING CMIZIISS1014 ACTION: March 22. 1978
NATURE OF APPLICATION CONSIDERED BY MANNING C0 *SISSI0N:
'Lone Change from R -2 to C -2
ACTION TAKEN BY PIANING CUMISSION: zone change dented
IF AN APPROVAL WAS CIOANCED STATE. CONDITION; ATfACHED BY PLAIINING
COMMISSION, IF ANY:__
PRESENT TONE CLASSIFICATION OF LA.311 INVOLVED: R -2 _
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION or PROPERTY: Northeast corner of Raker Avenue
and north of NSnth Screct and south_ f Arrow Route 1n,CacamnnRn
LoRal description attached.
MATURE OF THE APPEAL: Appeal the denial of change of zone case Index ?Is. WM -86
REASON FOR THE APPEAL, (herein set forth where there tins an error or nbuse
of discretion h �'t
Y the '� y Planning Ctrnnlsr.[nn. IC it zone variance is.
Involved, nppellant munt n1-so set furl.h pm•Ut•ola,•. tihercin nppl(cntion fm
varlance did meet or d[d fall
w Lo meet rrgnireateotn nn art forth In Secltub
`
6Lf 90(6) .xu .Sait un hr. .)CIO&/
The Minutes reflect the vcrbol tequ st to mend the appllcntlun to C -1 from C -2 to
be more in ke, -ing with adjacent zoning The denial was boxed upon said change being
premature due to the current process of preparin6 nev Ceneral pinn Based upon the hearinp
and findings, a motion to continue the hearing until after the preparation of Initial pre-
sentation of the General Plan would bu In order. Ify appeal to y,'(e City Cou to 1 1s to make
finding to continue the Itearine until n era rod in,.. T ——
Date filed in Office of Clerk:
p
Fee: * pO Date Paid: $ ^ /p- By:_
r' lLu ?.t?li7;
16 - 6564 - Olo
g"), Or fo .
0
0
LEGAL MCRIPTf0:1
N/E CORNER OF BAKER AVE 4 9T11 STREET
Cucamonga
Parcel No 1:
166 -0101
That portion of Lot 23, Section 9, Township 1 south, range 7 vest, Snn
Bernardino Merldlan, according to Hap of Cucamonga Lauds, lying west and
north of the County Highway (known as Arrow Route), nt the same exists
on said property, an per plat recorded in book 4 of ltipn, page 9, records
of said County, together with that portion of Ninth Street abandoned by
Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County, a
certified copy of which was recorded ,tune 24, 1964 In book 6176, page
455, Official Records.
Excepting therefrom the north 311 5 feet of the west 247 feet thereof
measured from street centers
Also excepting therefrom any portion in roads or highways
Parcel No 2:
An easement to lay a water pipe line over snd across the north 311 5
feet of the west 247 feet of said Lot 23
l a �
tI1rH �
i tP?F�
Y p �
ArrC•At� 0 R ARC �eatt y OF
THE Ccf'1 1tx—b AT 'S':i•:R 'A'Qb ,& t o m
actlou by C1111NTY P1ANN1tIG Clk01f °:.r.70t1
` ^" (01.d,- No: -6Itl� Sea 4t nnlfl,_ awao,cnJr.d )•
DATE: may 10. 1978
I11UIiY, Ntl; N85 -86
APPELLANT'S NA1IE: !!.Cuttcban A Ansoclotes. Inc
AliumsS 2100 Pont Foothill OoulevarJ _ —_ `
Pnsadrrn. Calif 91107
DATE ur PLANNING CCPRIISSION ACTION: Nnrch 22, 1978 _
NATURE OF APPLICATION CNNSIDF.RF.D ItY VIANNING CIRS97SSI0;l :_
Zone Change from R -2 to C -2
ACTION TAKEN BY PiANNING COI•PIISSION: Zero change danled
IF AN APPROVAL 3 GICAMIED STATE CONDITIONS ATTACIIED BY PLA[INING
WHISSI04, IF ANY:
PRESENT ZONE CLASSIFICATION OF LAND INVOLVED: R -2 _
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION OF PRGFF.RTI'• Nurthcaat turner or aakcr Avenue
and north of Ninth Street ad south of Arrow Route 1n- Cucamnagn - --
Legal description ttnclie,]
IIATURF. OF TUE APFPAf.: APPcal the dental of change of ?one case lnJux flo 685 -86
REASON FOR THE APMAL•, I (heroin set forth tohrre thr•rr vns all error or nlnr:r•
of discretion by the Ltotih[y Plannlnf; Cannls:.;rn. if n ?nuo variaucr ir.
Involved, nrrellint must also set Cot•th pat•L,culn,•o l,Jiro cill :Ipplicatlfill I:n
variance did meet or did fail to meet requirv,,.cut:: an net forth in Sect it'll
16; 2 ,—C JPt1- T7o- S,•�;SI- •n1- :lmcndrd:� `
4f.(.75C(A) '1,1, .I .YL
The Minutes reClec[ the verbal re9UCSt to amend the application to C-1 room C -7 to
be more fa keeping with adjacent <ontnf,. Tim denial was batted Allan sold chnnga bcing-
Preouture due to the current Process of preparing new Crnvrtl Pl.m Baned upon the henrltw•
and findings, a motion to continue tiro hearing until after tlu• preparation of In111nl prr-
nentatlon of the General Plan would be In order. fly npyr•i I• City C�nCu}�C 1 Is to make
f lnJ fag to contlnuc the bearinR un[ll a stated date !n rn of �,t;
> tL r.I1MIAN AGSO(�r'
t. •• nr
Date filed in OCficc oC Cleric: Appr•11a
_
ec:_ _ !it Uatc Paid:
rt
16 - 6564 - 010
IS .
yo
a
'vY
My
,.act YL "sa3: -�_ -- - • � -�ql`_': '
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
N /P. CORNER OF RAKER AVE. 6 9711 STREET
Cucamonga
Parcel No. It
166 -0101
That portion of Inc 23, Section 9, Township 1 south, range 7 west, San
Bernardino Meridian, according to map of Cucamonga 1. uds, lying west and
north of the County 11lghwny (krawn as Arrow Route), at the same exists
on said property, as per plat recorded in book 4 of Kips, page 9, record„
of said County, together with that portion of Ninth Street abandoned by
Resolution of the Board of Suporvlsors of San Bernardino County, a
certified copy of which was recorded June 24, 1964 in book 6176, page
455, Official Records.
Excepting therefrom the north 311 5 feet of the west 247 feet thereof
measured from street centers
Also excepting therefrom any Faction in roads or highways.
Parcel No. 2:
An casement to lay a water pipe line over and across the north 311 5
feet of the west 247 foot of said Int 23.
1
=•r
d"
r
lk
0
Planning Cotmission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1918 1
PUBLIC HEARING:
ZONE CHANCE FROM C -1 TO C -2. INDEX 110. 81 -82
C/S OF GROVE AVE., BETWEEN SAN BERNARUINO 6 RANCHERIA DRIVE
(Francis /More)
Mr. Payne reported that the applicant is requesting a change of zone from C -1
to C-2 an 1.06 acres to permit a bank and related development or mobile home sales.
Ile completed the ztaff report indicating staff', findings and recommendations on
the project.
The Chairman declare the hearing open.
Me, Bert Francls, applicant, spoke in favor of the zone change
Mr. Garcia asked the applicant for the anticipated completion date for the
project. Hr. Francle stated that he did not have a date
Mrs. Jones raked as to what other uses the applicant desired which required
the zone change. The applicant stated they wanted a storage facility.
Hr Lew Welk spore in apposition to the zone change stating his objection to
the mix uses of commercial and residential dwellings in the area.
There being no further testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed.
ACTION: On motion by Dahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously carried, it was
voted to deny the clu:nge of zone request, Index no. 81 -82 based on the following
finding:
(1) The City to in the process of reviewing an ordinnnee regarding
commercial uses and zones and this item should be reviewed after
the ordinance has bean adopted.
PUBLIC NEARING:
ZONE CH;%NCE FROM R -2 to C -2, INDEX NO. W85 -86
N/E CORNER OP BARER AVE. S 9TH STREET
(Mcrutchan A Associates, Inc ),
Hr. Payne presented the staff report stating that the applicant Is requesting
a zone change for R -2 to C -2 to accommodate general comercial uses. The site to
situated between residential and commercial /light industrial uses. lie stated five
concern and staff's findings for recomsending that the zone change be denied.
The chairman declared the hearing open
Mr. Tom HcCutchan, applicant, spoke in favor of the project lie stated that
about 5,000 dwelling unite can be developed around the site and that there was a
need for a neighborhood shopping center.
City Attorney Dougherty stated that the neighborhood market use in allowed
in the C -1 zone and that the major objections to the proposed z....a change area for
uses allowed in the C -2 zone Ile asked if the applicant wou:d object to amending
his application to a C -1 zone
Hr McCutchan stated he would be willing to verbally amend his application
to a C -1 zone
Mr. Dougherty stated thnt it would be aI„raprite to give staff lime to rovieu
the applicant's amendment for a C -1 zone.
Pastor James Smith of a neighboring church spoke in opposition to this Item and
expressed his concern regarding the inadequate streets, nearby schools and the mix
uses of residential and commercial uses In the area
Hr John Harsh stated that the traffic is bad but that there was a need for
a neighborhood store.
- A -
r
i
-Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) March 22, 1978
PUBLIC NEARING: (cont'd)
ZONE CHANGE INDEX NO. W85 -86
Mrs. Lillian HI-ler spoke in favor of the zone change stating that more
revenues would be gained for the city and the roads •nuld is fixed.
There being no further testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed.
ACTION: On motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Jones and unanimously carriad, it was
voted to deny the zone change, index no. W85 -86, based on the following finding:
(1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is in the process of preparing a new
general plan and a zone change to general commercial at this time
would be premature.
PUBLIC NEARING:
ZONE VARIANCE TO CREATE TWO (2) LOTS, ONE HAVING LESS THAN THE
HINIMDI AREA REQUIREMENTS. INDEX NO. 1187 -51. N/S OF HIDDEN PAID(
ROAD, APPROX. 45' E/0 CARNELIAN AVENUE (Walter White)
Planning staff member John Perevuznik reported that the applicant Is seeking
a variance to crease 2 lots, one lot lees than the minimum area requirement of the
R -1- 20,000 zone. The deficient lot would be approximately 13,300 eq. ft. (discount-
ing easements). The Subdivision Review Committee made a finding that the project
did not receive an affirmative response to all primary considerations, specifically
schools.
The Chairman declared the hearing open.
lire Call White, applicant, spoke in favor of the application giving a brief
history and description of their request. She stated that they planned to build a
home comparable to theirs an the lot and that there were extraordinary circumstances
for their request (e g , the great amgpnt of road Improvements).
Mr. Henry Martinez, resident on Hidden Farm Road, spoke in opposition to the
zone variance stating that the square footage is far below that which is required
in the area and that this might set a precedent for future property owners.
Others speaking in opposition to this item were -
Mr. Dave Henderson
Mr. Gino Simoni
Mr Hel Luftbraer
The following people spoke in favor of the variance -
Mr. Dan August
Mr Pat Case
Hr. MachinskL
Mr. Robett Luthanski
There being no further testimony, the chairman declared the hearing closed.
Mrs. Jones asked staff if people north of this property could request variances
for substandard lots. The staff answered in the affirmative
Mr. Tolstoy expressed his sympathy with the applicant but held that the expteta-
tions of the neighboring property owners must be considered as well as water and
sewage problems.
Mr. Dahl stated that a variance of this type would not allow animals.
- 5 -
;x
J
0 0
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 28, 1978
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JACK W1, DIRECTOR OF COMMITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78 -0230
The subject site is located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and
Jersey Boulevard The proposal is for an idustrial tract consisting of
fifteen (15) lots on 20.8 acres of land, which is currently undeveloped.
The minor subdivision went to the City Planning Commissior on June 14,
1978 and received approval subject to all the conditions stipulated by
the County Staff agencies, as per the attached County Staff Report The
applicant, Crowell and Leventhal, is appealing the decision of the
Planning Commission in regards to two (2) of the required conditions:
1 Vehicular access -fights shall be dedicated for Maven Avenue,
2 Interior access shall be redesigned to provide a 50 foot street
terminating in a 47 foot radius cul -de -sac in lieu of the proposed
40 foot private casement located between Lots 4 through 6 and 7
through 9. Said 50 foot street shall be relocated between proposed
Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4 through 6.
The attached drawing depicts the proposed fifteen (15) lot industrial tract
and shows both the 40 foot access easement as well as the cul -de -sac street
required by the Planning Commission The applicant feels that waiver of
access onto Haven is unwarranted and furthermore the cul -de -sac street
required by the Planning Coam:lssion should be replaced by a reciprocal
easement to obtain more flexibility in design of any future project The
Community Development Department has examined the two (2) points of
contention and finds the conditions as recommended by the County and as
stipulated by the Planning Commission have merit and should be retained
(see attached memo from City Engineer) Tho subject site is adjacent to
Haven Avenue, a major thoroughfare in the community It is good City
policy to, whenever possible, restrict access from major arterials when
alternative access is available, in this case, via Jersey Boulevard
Restriction of access from a majoe arterial helps maintain the integrity
of the street as a major arterial It helps maintain its efficiency
and safety as a major traffic carrier The applicant maintains that the
present traffic conditions do not warrant this dodication, however, this
situation will chang, in the future as Haven wit become a much more
heavily travollnd street Many communities watt until traffic conditions
are intilerable before any action is taken to restrict access, at which timo
the solutions for solving any circulation problem arc either limited or
non- ext•tant. To only consider the existing street conditions and not
look towards the future is poor planning
APPEAL OF MINOR SUDDIViSION :40 78 -0230
Pa-0 2
July 28, 1976
As to the issue of s requirement ,i l street, becomes apparent
that P roperly lm roed access isnec ssary for LotsI thrugh 6Staff
hat
coloriorw lot wouldjboi desirable but no integratedydevelfpment plan
shasnbeen for uture proposed that might necessitate anything other than an improved access road.
purtheraore, since this is a subdivision creating a number of interior lots,
tents would access control a! c thaaparcclsdhavo bttnasplit andesuldi.d Staff
Of that the only time °n access street would not be required, if there
was un integrated development plan approved for this project. MY
taaen on the design of this subdivision cannot speculate on the future in-
tentions of the applicant Staff r.•,tnt °ins that there remains l site plan for Of
industrial as well s Ordinance 18
�elaial usesircif then applicantwwere to ohtalw future
r or
not necissttato ^ate cul-de-sac et asghercin' described* h tuo City t could would
revise this condition to ,llow an alternative
oordinated development for forrparcels o I through
are sold individually without any
v� °then properly° cesignededcbysthooPlanningvC °mmissionr the rites 1n question,
RECOMMENDATION:
staff an Jsuphotdttho decisioncuf �:hoyPlanning ninor Subdivision
Res/ppaaacctIIIAAAf111u11ly subs Iced.
jACK LA;j, Dirc.ctor of
Community levelopment
JL:dm
Attachments: 2 Map the the City
3. Planning Commission Staff Report of Juno 14, 1978.
4 Applicant's appeal request
e'
CI1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: JULY 27, 1978
TO: JACK LMT, COltIUN1TY DEVELOFIIENT DIRECTOR
FROH: LIAYD HUBBS, CITY ENGI*ER
SUBJECr: APPEAL OF MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78 -0250
The subject appeal objects to the dedlcaiton of access rights to haven Avenue
and the development of a private street by reciprocal easements between lots
one through three and four through six.
Too Engineering Department has reviewed the appeals and recommends:
1. That non - access to haven Avenue be maintained: Retain County Requirement.
It has been the policy of the San Bernardino County Planning Commission to
deny where possible access to all major and secondary highways. The .__
purpose of this policy is to maintain capacity and safety on all major
thoroughfares Although traffic volumes on haven Avenue do not currently
demonstrate capacity or safety problems, this situation will be altered in
the near future The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has not yet had
an opportunity to review access policies on major highways and establish Its
own politics for particular streets It is the Engineering Department's
recommendation that the County policy be maintained particularly for
Haven Avenue.
2. That the rogufromcnt for the private street development be required: Retain
Lounty Rcqu cement
The Engineering Department agrees that future design flexibility of access
would be desirable but would not like to sea any development occur without full
development of the proposed private street. For this reason the County
requirements should be retained
In the future as a part of development review if the sibdivlder wishes to propose
a more Integrated design the City,pould at that time revise this condition to
allow the alternative design.
�Tt^ tfully sub fitted,
�J
.j �LLD161 -Sis
1 City If/l aagincer
sw LH:dm
'mot
r
0,
x
M
'� UI
W
r�
' 1
• 1 •
1
LAND DIVISION APPLICATION 1
8td1 BERNARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 '
/ranw .court
/ AC ss RohD REpulftD 6Y F W1. C,0K
.EA6ee�
NT fropaeo BY I ,
PAIL MAP HO.j/993 orrn.raou.rm +wrla
N'eu1uN ¢h /u/b.lYr Mold,*
.r = MlA,a�, ao
/J az5ci
LOT AREAS
1 43.485 S. F. or 1.00 Acre
2. 43. 570 S.F. or 1. 00 Acre
3. 43. 570 S. F or 1.00 Acre
4. 44.455 S.F, or 1 02 Acras
5. 44.455 S. F. or 1 02 Acres
6. 44.455 S.F. or 1.02 Acres
7. 43.485 S. F. or 1.00 Acre
M',1116
J�
8. 43,570S.F. or 1 Acre
9. 43, 570 S. F. or 1 Acre
10. 55.675 S.F. or 1.28 Acres
11. 55.615 S.F. or 1.28 Acres
12. 55, $90 S. F or 1.28 Acres
13. 107. 100 3. F. or 2.46 Acres
14. I07. 100 S.F. or 2.46 Acres NGII
I - 15. I07, 100 S. F. or 2.46 Acras E�
M.D
fire4
APPLICAII' Offtce Use Only)
time -C.'. Phone S7l 1)981 -I OLI
;a. e,s 1260N. Foothill Blvd., Upland. CA. 91786 L.D. NO, fA/yB -0730 S I ;
I ZO:E N -2 1•
I LLCM =0 OF RECOW: AOAO INP 800K PALE N0. �YYt•1 '
1'ene Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. rllone(7l 4)951 -1041 r
tw area 1260 N. Foothill Blvd., Upland, CA. 91786 HE RECEIPT NO.
/a!!•.7Jat. i
j IN^.PAEPA? =^
• r.:A.tY A, ,
i••.•J uLA1UlA; UA'.L: June 14, 1778
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING, COMMISSION
0 AULWJA 1-411 NO. 3
ROUTINC ITEM Xx Y,
NON- ROUTINC ITal
TIRE OF ITEM y700 PM
AWA: Cucamonga
I'IIJ : /Irri)F.x till: minor Subdivision No. 1978- 0230 -II
11IUPOCN.: Industrial tract consisting of 15 lots on 20.8 acres
II)CATION: Northeast corner of Raven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard.
APPI.aur: Crowell /Loventhal, Inc.
I7r.w37r/Ammilicr: Associated Engineers
N/A PUItI.R' IU'Al1It;G NUfICFS SQlr ON
H17hRf P17I•ARI:) w: John Perevuzni i
mmn ltv " ";Pwriltl TtN1:
DA71: Or LNSPIrricu:
iwo:1 s17.I:: 20.8 acres N /L,
'
UQA7 IISEt Vineyard
i
1 °1 ^fitY; 7.CNIt!(:: t•1 -2
t
SUIUt /1.171 r1G I:: T) USE AIJ YONlIh;
NORM: Vacant, undeveloped, II -2
LAST: Undeveloped, proposed industrial,
r,., ) „�•
�•
SCUIt I; Industrial uses, t1 -2
�'•• ='` = ' :•
1 •:
t9GSf: Vinery, Driving Range, I! -2
•___' •�•"••>•_•
(UNERAL PINT MA) DFS1GmTiai: Proposed Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is in
planning stage. Conditions described in
government code 65302.5(6)(4)(B) exist.
'1'111' I:r:VIno:); :I:uTAl. Ituvir..N ON
PET•ER11INED
,ruhr 'rRlS PROJECT 11OULD NAVE A
- -1Yl't:CT ON THE
ENVIRONMENT.
w.l[CC
EIWl't
,Y SI•AF'F' RILYITU7a%TTro: Approve, subject be attached conditions
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
. Y.
t
ia�
Staff AnalyuL.:
Applicant is requesting approval to create lei;dustrial lots for sale or
lease to future industrial users.
Ube proposed sulmitted design designates a 40 foot private road casement '
for access to parcels 4 thru 9 and direct access fran Raven Aaermo to par-
cels 1 thru 3. Tha ultimate rightrof -way for haven Avenue will be 134 feet
and the County Transportation DeparSnent remmends that access rights be
relLquishod on Raven Avenue by apprrpriate dedication. Aecasa to rimerior
Parcels to de provided LY a 50 foot wide road terminating in a standard cal-
d0-sac to be located bebten parcels 1 thru 3 nni 4 thou 6 as shown on at-
tached Minor Subdivision Plot Map.
Findings as Fvanre dod by Staff:
Based upon submitted data and reoonmerdations from other County Agencies,
Staff recametds that the Planning Camnission make the following findings:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the adopted County -
Wide and the proposed City Community General plans, both
textual and mapped.
2. Adequate service capacity exists, has been reserved, or .
will be available at such :ime as the project ie completed
or within a reasonable acceptable time frame for fire pro-
tection, drainage and circulation.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed typo of
density and development.
4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvement
arc not likely to cause substantial environmental damage
or substantially and avoidable i,juro fish and wildlife and
their habitat.
5. The design of the subdivision or type of proposed improve -
mont are not likely to cause serious public health problems
or cause threat to life and property from a wildfire con-
flagration.
6. The proposed aubdivlsion; its design, density and type of
development and improvements conform to the conditions im-
posed by the County Subdivision chapter, the regulations of
the County Zoning chapter and the regulations of any public
agency having jurisdiction by law.
Recommendation:
Based upon the above listed findings, Staff would make the fol-
lowing recoimnendations:
t..
1. That a Megative Declaration be adopted and that the Secre-
tary be instructed to file a Notice of Determination.
2. That the City Council APPROVE Minor Subdivision W70- 0230 -I
as depicted on attached plot map subject to the attached y
conditions: [�.,
Irnn•:,WdivuA h'711- 029stiI Pago /of 5 .
SINUMM HERUIREM S:
1 11n water system and fire hydrants stall be installed in accordance
with roquiranmts of the State lkalth and safely code, and in aarordanoo
with plans approved by the San Bernardino Warty Department of Environental
Health Services and the governing fire protection authority.
2• I'asvronts and improvements shall be provide] an] drainage coordinated
In accordance with the standards and rcquiramnts of the County of San
Pernardlno and the County Planning Caimissial.
1
3 Hhero a bond is to be posted in lieu of installation of the improvarenG
A. 77c danestic water plan and/or sewer plan stall be reviewW by a
civil engineer, registered in the State of California and said
cngineor shall determine the amount a,£ bond necessary to install
the improvements This amount plus ten porce nt shall be posted
with the County of San Bernardino.
B. The presently required certificates on water raps for the water-
company and engineer must still W placed on the map. In addition,
a stakzmnt shall be transmitted to the rublic Itralth Department
signor oy the Registered civil engineer for the water purveyor
stating that the amamt of hand recrnmandcd is adoguato to cover
the cost of installation of the lmprovenent.
C Ivrtl,^.r, prior to release of tln bond for the inprrnvmnt, the
emilneer for the subdivider or the utility of jurisdiction shall
sunit a eigncd statemnt confirming thit the improvamnt has
been installed according to the approved plans and seats the
requirements of all appropriate Stito and County laws pertaining
to such irprova ant. it is the develohmr'a responsibility that
such signed statement is filed wit') the County Dopartment of
Environmental Health Services.
D. In oases where the water agency or sewerinl agency is a governmental
subdi-ision, prior to final recording of the tract map, the
gevermrcntal agency Shall sulmlt a statement direetod be the
County stating that the Uprownent has been installed according
to the approval plans or stating that the bond in the amount of
110 percent of the cost of installation of the irprovarent has
been placed with t1n agency
"• A crnmitnnnt shall be obtained, In writir,h, from the sooting agency.
Salrl anmLtment to indicate thut the agency has tle capacity to furnish
said ewer service to the subject project, and that all necessary
annnxlomrntz have been mado with said agency to supply such services
A copy of the candbra nt to be filed with the Planning Department.
N' b
ai Y
.�i�l
,: +,� i t.,r ul•. •: u;1 .:u. t, /6- 0230 -i (r��camony`1) Paget of-<
1 * STREET, GRADING AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS:
3 County Transportation Department:
a
7 6 Paving, curbs and utters "hall be installed on Haven Avenue,
Jersey Blvd., and atica, and cul -de -sac road. Plans for all
a improvements must be approved by the City Engineer prior to
9 installation of said improvements. A cash deposit or bond may be
10 placed with the City to fulfill this requirement.
11 1
12 Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated for Haven Avenue.
13
14 Sixty (60) foot offer of dedication required for Utica Street.
IS
16 Twenty (20) foot radius of return offer of dedication required
17 for rounding the corner on Utica Street and cul -de -sac road.
Is
19 County Flood Control District:
20
21 A topographic map should be
22 provided to facilitate the deign
23 and review of necessary drainage facilities at the time the
24 site is developed.
25
26 The natural drainage courses traversinq the site not be occupied
27 or onstructed.
Ia
uAdequate provisions should be made to intercept and conduct the
11 tributary drainage flows around or through the nito in a manner
31 which will not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties
32 at the time the site is developed.
34 Future building pads should be elevated above natural ground
33 to reduce damage duo to overflow.
36
37 County Surveyor:
39
39 Upon completion of all other conditions, a Parc al Map of the
4I proposed division shall be recorded with the County Recorder
aI pursuant to provisions of the State Map Act. (NOTE: This map
43 must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or a registered
44 civil engineer.) A1: advance copy of the Parcel Map may be
4S submitted to the County Surveyor to expedite checking, but the
46 County Surveyor will not accept the linen for presentation to the
47 County Recorder for filing until notified by the Planning
48 Director that your Minor Subdivision application is in order for
49 final a?proval.
So
�- 52 The Parcel Map is required duo to insufficient survey data
recorded with the County of San Bernardino.
53
54
Y 55
;; 56
.Fnnr Fubdivi *n No. W78- 02311 -I (CUCam,110 J
Page of �
I *In addition to the Street and Drainage requirements, other 'on-site-
2 or off -sito" improvements may be required which cannot be determined
.3 from tentative plans and would have to be determined after mom"
4 complete improvement plans and profil�n have been submitted to the
-5 County Transportation Department.
g COUNTY FIREWARDEN:
9
10 Fire flow will be determined by this department upon receipt
11 of the following inf ^rmation: 1
12
13 a. Two (2) sets of plans,
14 b. Type of roof covering,
IS C. Number of stories.
16
17 Calculations indicating that the fire flow requirement will be
IB met shall be submitted to this department
19 approval. prior to plan
20
21 Water mains and appurtenances shall be installed in accordance•
22 with the requirements of the Cucamonga County .later District.
23
24 This department shall be notified to witness an a- ceptanco test
IS of the water system prior to construction of any building(s)
26
27 or structure(s).
28
29 Fire hydrant assemblies shall be installed in accerdance with
30 :equlremants of this district.
31
32 Fire hydrants shall be installed prior to commencing construc-
33 tion of any building(s) or structure(s), and shall be approved
34 wet barrel type only.
35
36 All streets and cul -de -sacs shall meet the minimum San Bernardino
37 County Transportation Department standards.
38
39 Streets leading to cul -de -saps or dead ends shall not exceed
40 600 feet in length. In the event these streets are redesigned
41 in any manner, the 600 foot length shall be maintained on all
A2 resubmitted plans (tentative or final).
43
44 COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
4S
46 street lighting shall be provided throughout the tract Secluding
47 all peripscral streets.
48
50 Utility lines shall be placed underground in accordance with the
SI requirements of County Ordinance No. 2041.
52 The existing zoning is 24-2.
L.. V.
.j
1
I.411( :dh011V161614 NU. W18-023P-1 (CuamK)ngs page H of 3
Prior to recordation of the parcel map, all required walls and
landscaping shall be completed or suitable bonds posted for their
completion. Bonds shall be posted with the Planning Department.
Three (3) copies of a final Grading Plan shall be submitted for
Planningj Director review and approval prior to the issuance of
gradins permits, where finished perimeter slopes are proposed
adjacent to existing development, or when graded slopes exceed
five (5) feet in vertical height.
Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum slope ratio of
2 to 1 and a maximum vertical height of 30 feet
Graded slopes shall be contout- graded to balnd with existing
natural contours and developed with a minimum radius at inter-
secting horizontal planes of two (2) feet, (measured one (1)
foot from the top or toe of slope) and a maximum horizontal length
of two hundred (200) feet.
The surface of all cut slopes more than five (5) fact in height
and fill slopes more than three (3) feet in height shall be
protected against damage by erosion by planting with grass or
ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in
vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not
to exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to
exceed ten (10) feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to
exceed twenty (20) fact on centers; or a combination of shrubs
and trees as cover plants. The plants :elected and planting
methods used shall be s;•itablo for the soil and climatic con -
ditons of the site;
Trees 100 - 15 gal.; 40% - 5 gal ; 50: - 1 gal.
Shrubs 206 - 5 gal.; 606 - 1 gal
Ground Cover - 1006 coverage.
Three copies of a Landecdping Plan reflecting the above require-
ments and placement of street trees (if required)
shall be submitted for Planning Director Review and approval.
The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be
the responsibility of the developer and guaranteed until the
transfer to individual ownership or until the maintenance is
officially assumed by a County Service Area.
All irrigation systems where required shall be designed on an
individual lot basis unless commonly maintained in an approved
manner.
Prior to recordation of the parcel map, four (4) codes of a
Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for review and approval.
1 .:11, t•1 , utVIN16:r I:u. 11)0- 0271• -I
•`J (CueomolU3a)
I
2•
3
4
5
6
7
R
4
10
11
12
13
14
:5
16
17
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
'.8
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
17
38
39
40
42
43
44
46
'47
9
W a f:.e.r.j
Dalg0 5-of.,
•
Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, a letter from the
serving water and sewer egoncy shall be submitted certifying
that capacity for Minor Subdivision W78- 0230 -I has been re-
served for a minimum period of one (1) year.
Interior access shall be redesigned to provide a fifty (50)
foot street terminating in a 47 foot radius cul -de -sac in lieu
of tho proposed 40 foot private casement located between lots
four through six and seven through nine. Said fifty foot street
shal' be relocated between proposed lots one through three and
four through six.
.i
�° OF RANCHO CUCAMONRA 49
NOR SUBDIVISION APPEAL
TO THE PLANNING COMMISSIO11
(PREPARE IN DUPLICATE)
CROWELL /LCVENTIIAL, INC.
APPLICANT
1260 t•'. FOOTHILL BLVD.
ADDRESS
UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786
(714) 981 -1041
PHONE NUAISER
Application No. N72- 0230 -E
DATE STAS!P
NATUPZ OF APPEAL: (Cheek apprcoriate box)
Q I hereby appeal Planning Director denial dated '
XXX I hereby request waiver /modification of conditions assigned by
Planning Director approval dated —J,nne 14. 1978
Condition(s):
1. PAGE 2, LINE 12: VEHICLE ACCESS RIGHTS SHALL BE DEDICATED FOR HAVEN A%n
2. PAGE 5 LINES 6 -11: INTERIOR ACCESS SHALL DE REDESIGNED....
3.
REASON FOR APPEAL: WAIVER: MODIFICATION:
PAGE 2, LINE 12: DEDICATION. OF ACCESS IOR RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON -RAVEN
HAVE NOT BEEN SO REQUIRED, PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DO NOT WARRANT DED-
ICATION, REQUIREMENT WOULD RESTRICT HIGHEST AND DESTI§AGF. AND WOULD LIMIT
VALUE OF PARCELS. PAGE 5, LINES 6 - 11: TO RETAIN FLEXABILITY FOR FUTURI
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WL•' REQUEST THAT THE REQUIRED PRIVATE STREET BE RE-
. ,. It IrnucAGI EASE14FNT [SEE ATTACHED) WHICH COULD BE ELIMMAT
BY PRESENT OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERS IC NOT REQUIRED FOR TH (DERLY DEVLMC
OF PARCELS 1 -6 WHERE 7140 OR MORE PARCELS ARE COMBINED FOR DEVELOPMENT.
STAFF REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION.
-PL..NNI:IG CO1-4ISSION ACTION:
n
a •
u'i
20
O
✓ER�E�
0
I O
' fre c i�OF'O Clt�
Ea�ernenf
,BVol H VAAPO
a
Planning Commission Minutes June 14, 1978
APPEAL OF PLANNING DIRECTOR'S ACTION, MINOR
SUBDIVISION, 4 LOTS, INDEX NO. 78 -0025, S/N
CORNER VICTORIA 6 EAST AVENUE
(Alfredo C Hur111o)
Hr. Stevens reported that the applicant is seeking to create four lots from
an existing five acre parcel The application was not approved as submitted,
but an alternate design consisting of two parcels was conditionally approved.
The application was not approved as submitted because all of the conditions
required by Ordinance 18 have not been met Staff recommends that the Planning
Director's action approving 2 lots be ulheld based on their findings and
analyses.
Mrs Alfredo Hurillo, applicant, spoke in favor of their request to subdivide
the parcel into 4 lots. She stated that they are planning to build on the
pr..poded lot 13 with the possibility to selling lots Al and 2 She felt that
the school issue would be taken care of by the City Council's ordinance
requiring a $700 fee for new homes, and that the fire flow capacity requirement
is covered by the higher insurance premiums reoidents of Eti+anda are required
to pay.
A:-'_CY: Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Cdrela and unanimously carried, it
was voted to continue this Stem to August 9, 1978 until the applicant is
able ro comply with the requirements of Ordinance 18
REPORT ON CONVERSION OF RESIDENCE IMO A RESTAURANT,
INDEX NO. U88 -81, S/N CORNER OF FOOTHILL 6 VINEYARD
(Gilbert Rodriquez)
Hr. Rodriquez, the applicant, presented the drawings showing landsepping ana
parking changes as requested by the Planning Commission.
ACTION: The Planning Commissioner, unanimously requested the applicant to
work with the Planning Staff in finalizing their plane in accordance with
the Camission's earlier findings.. -
MINOR SUBDIVISION TO CREATE AN INDUSTRIAL TRACT OF
15 LOTS, INDEX NO N78- 0230 -I, N/N CORNER OF MAVEN
AND JERSEY BLVD. (Crowell /Leventhal /Associated Engineer)
Mr Stevenc reported that the applicant is requesting approval to create 16
industrial lots for sale or lease to future industrial users lie gave a
detailed report of the staff's findings and ecommendatlons Staff recommends
that a negative declaration be filed for an Environmental Impact Report and
that the Commission approve staff's recommendation in accordance with their
findings and standard requirements.
Mr David Benton spoke an behalf of the applicant and presented a letter from
Crowell /Leventhal, Inc dated June 13, 1978 requesting modification to the
planning staff recommendations He detailed the modifications requested by
the applicant Mr Marry Crowell, applicant, stated that they have had some
favorable commitments for tenants and would like to have a decision on this
as soon as possible.
Mr. Garcia stated that he did not receive any information on this project prior
to the meeting and did not feel he could act on it at this time Mrs. Jones
concurred that she did not have any prior information on this Stem.
ACTIUN. Upon motion by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy and carried by the following
vote - AYES: Dahl, Tolstoy, Rempel; ABSENT: None; ABSTAINING: Car in and Jones,
it was voted to approve the minor subdivision, Index No N78- 0230•L s'ibject to
the findings and standard requirements as recommended by the planning staff.
- 3 -
Ifl
r:
I
M
ORDINANCE NO. 31
AN ORDINANCE OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCMIONCA, CALIFORNIA PERTAINING To TIIE PRESERVATION OF
TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
I. GENERAL
SECTION 1. Intent and purpose
The purpose of tl,lq Ordinance is to encournge preservation of trees and
vegetation Within ti:e City of Rancho Cucamonga on private as well as
public property.
It PRI:SCRVATION OF TREES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
SECTION I. Applicability and Size Criteria.
Tim provisions of this Article shnll apply to all trees oil any developed
or undeveloped private Property within tiro City of Rancho Cucamnnga For
the Purposes of thtq Ordinance tree shall menu tree, plant, shrub or other
similar form of vegetation which meet the following criteria:
(a) All woody plants in excess of twenty (20) fret in
height and having a single trunk circumference of
twenty (20) Inches or more
(b) llalti- trunks having a total circumference of thirty (30)
inches or more, ad measured twe•:ty -four (24) Inches from
ground level.
(e) Trees Which are fruit or n a bearing and commercial
nursery stock shall be excluded from the previsions
of this Ordinance
SECTION 2. Permit required to remove trees.
No person, firm or corporation shall cut down, move, degtroy or rcmvo
any tree growing within the City limits without first having obtained
a Tree Removal Permit from the City
SECTION 3. Permit Application.
Application for suriu permit shall he made to the Community Development
Director or Director'n designee. Said application shall contain the
following information:
(a) Species of tree(.) under consideration.
(b) Number and size OPProxlmate height and circumference
.w measured 24" from ground level) of tree(a) under
conatterntlon
(c) A statement as to reasons for removal (If tree is diseased,
a written statement by a licensed nrbor(st stating nature of
the disease.
(d) A plot plan showing the aPProxioate location of all trees
on the site, including those proposed as remalninr
(e) Proposed method of removal
SECr107 S. Permit Evaluation
Upon receipt of the appll,atlon. the Cmnrunily Ilrvelopmemt Director or
d.-sirPce 61,311 invc- tig.te Elie site and etraluate the application on the
basis of the following criteria:
(a) Whether or not the tree(s) could be preserved by
Printing rather than removal.
(b) Wbetl.er or rot such trees(s) crm•titute a significant
natural resource of the City of Ittncho Cucamonga.
(e) General condition and health of the tree(s).
(d) locidenre of any safety hazard to persons, adjacent
property or utility Installations.
(e) Prm,lalty and .it.ber of other treer• In the vicinity
anti the ability of tta "I) to adequately support
existing vegetation.
(f) 710 effect of the tree removal on the public health
anJ safety, and the general welfare and aesthetics
of the area.
SECTIDO S. Issuance of Permit
Snhsen,umt to invemtt IrAtSon. the Censmaity Development Director or designee
nay approve the permit for the removal of ..11 or Ruse, of the trees Included
In the arrllcation, and may attach conditions of corpliauce as denied necessary
to con(ors ul•h the presrribed criteria, Including Iuat not limited to the
replacement of the rerv.ved tree or green with rastnahly equivalent rep)acement
I rces, If in tM opinion of the Cosnaity Develn)m. -nt Director the removal
of tree or tree- inrl•vled in the appllcatlea would produce a signiflennt
I:goaet on the onvlrembmt, the application may be fnrwar. led to the Planning
Crvolssion fir review and action. Permits shall be effective ten (10) days
after approval and shall be valid for a period of 00 dayx, subject
LO a 90 -day rencvnl period at the arplicantos request
SfEZ 10S 6, Ifotification of Approval
r,..m arrrwlal of a Tree Fa. al Pernit, the C.naeunity Development Dirert r
r dv -lgnce xhill lime +llately give outlee to Elie pn7.prty miners adjoining
tlw - nhject property that Ruch Tree Ptanneyal permit was approved and Issued
and that sorb permit will bermte effective tint tin) days after the date
of its approval unless appealed pursuant to SEC.7107 7 of this Article.
SECTION 7. Appeal to the City Council
kuv person aWIevcJ by the denial or approval of a Tree Removal Permit
akrll be afforded rccrotx of appeal to the City G -eneil provided that
inch appeal is - amaltt,nl in triling to the City Clerk within ten (10)
days of Bald action. Such filing of an appeal shall autnaitically suspend
the permit Issued until action thereon 1- talen by tie City Council.
The appeal so Mini xMil be heard by the City Cwrcil as Its next regularly
xehednlr.l meeting, at which time the City Council mry affirm, modify or
reverse the derision of tie Cet=munl[y Devclopent Director, In any event,
the action of the City Council on the appeal shall be conclusive and final.
SECfIfrI S. Emergency Waiver
Where a tree Is determin,nl by the Community Ucvelof Rent Director or
Designee to be In a d.tneerous condition requiring emergency action to
preserve the public health, safety and welfare, the permit requirement
may be vtived. An appllratfon sImll thereafter to flied by the Ccomnity
Development Director explaining the action tatem and the reasons for this
waiver of permit. In the event of an er.e•rrwole cnm.e-d by a haaardous or
dangerous tree, which rovlltlon poses an Iew•dlafe Threat to person or
property, any neither of Elie Eire Departmtmt of Ile Gtr of Rancho Cucamonga
may nninrite tie dextruction or removal of site!, tree vltfuout securing a
prmit therefore.
II
I
F
r
r
Y '
SECTION 9_ Use of Explosives
All persons engaged In felling or removing trues, and desirous of
using explosives for 0114 1111-pn4o within the City limit-,, shall first
obtain approv.,ls to um t.urh explosives fr,vn the fuumnmtty Development
Director and the Ranrho Cu.amon,,• Fire Departm.•ut, tittle!, :gq,rov.,l shall
he noted on the Tree Rum,,val Permit prior to Issoanu• mt name by the
Community Development Dlreaat In addtitt,nt, 0.0 11111!!47.1111 shall
furnish such bond or Insurance no sh.tll be dcen,41 uete>,r,ry for the
prolccttan of ,.urnnmding property floor .any po•,sihl,• du.+.p;e wttlett might
result from such activity.
SECTION 10. Protection of Existing Trees
Care shall be excurci,ted by all individuals, developers and contractors
working near preserved trees so that no dnrage ae.ur4 to Bald trees
Precautions to be taken shall be outlined to the Cnmmunity Development
Director or an appointed representative prior to tonmvn,ement or activity
and shall be subject to Cumnualty Development Itiru.tur'4 approval
SECTION 11, Penalty
Violation of any suction of this Article shnll constitute a ml4dvmeanor,
punishable by a fine of not mare than SSnO u, by Iriprtsoncw•nt not to e%ceed
six (6) months, or both sueh fine and imprisonment Lach tree removed In
violation of this Article shall constitute a sepaea,• uffensv.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1978.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
• •
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 27, 1978
TO: City Council
FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Director Review of Multi - Family Development
Multi- fnmily development In the R -2, R -3 zoning districts currently requires
no review other than plan checking for the !aauance of building permits. The
Planning Commission has a <prcased interest in having some type of review pro-
cess whereby the City could review development pinns for such multi - family
uses. The Planning Commission feels that multi - family uses have as great an
Impact upon the physical character of the community as commercial and Indust-
rial uses On Wednesday, July 12, 1978, the Planning Cozmission requested-
Staff to prepare an amendment to Ordinance 19 providing for Director Review
of multi - family uses in addition to commercial and manufacturing uses. Further-
more, the Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt said ordinance
amendment. Such an amendment will enable the Director to review all multi-
family submittals and refer item to the Planning Commission were deemed appro-
priate. All Director Reviews could then become consent calendar items before
the Planning Commission
RECO}-MENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council adopt the
attached ordinance
Rcspcc f):11y submitted.
JACK LAM, Director ot-
C cant unity Development
JL:cm
the public peace, health, safety and welfare for the reasons stated
in Section 2 hereof, and shall take effect immediately upon its
adoption.
1978. APPROVED and ADOPTED this dzy of
ATTEST:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
-2-
0 •
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCUQ,CUCAMONGA; CALI-
FORNIA, _A CERTAI - ENTZAL USES TO THOSE
BUSINESS AND MANUFACTURING USES WHICH MUST RECEIVE
DIRECTOR'S REVIEW
9.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 1 of Ordinance No 19 of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby deleted and is revised and
enacted as follows:
"SECTION 1: Director Review All uses described
in Sections 61 024D,-C 024E. 6l_-0_2TA_,_6_1_0TTB, 61 029A and 61.029C
of the San Bernardino County Code are subject to review and approval
by the Director, under the provisions of Section 61.0219(n) of the
San Bernardino County Code, except as follows:
"(a) Director's review shall not be required
for residential development unless the same is expressly required
by provisions of the San Bernardino County Code or of this Ordinance
or any amendments or additions hereto; and,
"(b) Location and development plan approval, un-
der Section 61.0219(f) of the San Bernardino County Code, shall re-
main a requirement in all cases where the same is required by pro-
visions of the San Bernardino County Code; and,
"(e) Director's review shall not be required
for a residential pro3ect or development of three (3) units or less
unless the same is expressly required by provisions of the San Bern-
ardino County Code, this Ordinance or any amendments or additions
hereto. ".
SECTIO14 2: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California was
recently intara pornted and is now in the 4�ess of developing
-neral plan whr ch ib a necessary prerequisite to the developme t
of a curprohensiv .oning ordinance for the Ci There is an i
mediate need to adopt-,.review procedures describe n this Ordinanc
to insure that certain i It; family residential deve ments as wel
as business and industrial evelopment which take plac n the City
prior to the adoption of a ne eneral plan and comprehen a zoning
ordinance will not be detrimenta to the public health, safer and
welfare.
ON 3•. This Ordinan�herebyi�eclared`
a rgency measure neces •-yc fo`r the immedn and presets on of
-1-
t
NEMO RAM DUjI
DATE: June 29, 1978
TO: City Council
FROM: Lauren Wassom
f .y Manager
SUBJECT: Request for waiver of eolditlons of Tentative Tract Map
No 9444.
BACKCROUMD: Th13 request Is by. the Ringsway Construction Corp, to waive
the condition of a one -half ('t) Inch sound board to be placed In the
walls of the homes located on lots 16 through 36 and all second fluor
walls facing the noise source In units within 400 feet of the railroad
right -of -way. The following is a list of correspondence related to this
case, dating from the time of the Tentative Tract map approval:
October 21, 1976 - Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract 9446,
subject to condition requiring 1j' thick sound board and double - glazed
glass windows (Page 7 of 8 /1,ines 47 -54) for those houses on Lots 16 -36
which are adjacent to the railroad right -of -way
October 5, 1976 - Bio- Acoustical Engineering Corp letter to Mr Thomas 0
McCutchan Letter biaically states that the noise levels adjacent to the
R.R. R/N are not that great, taerefore, not requiring any special atten-
uation measures far those homes This letter van received by our Depart-
ment in late 1977 from the Department of Building and Safety
January 11, 1978 - Letter sent to Ringsway Congtructloo Corp., Attention
Darrell Craig, stating tills Department's intention to waive requirement
for noise attenuation mensures. However, complaints have been recelveu
from the property owners living adjacent to the R.R. R/M about the consid-
erable amount of noise generated by the trnlns It was indicated to Mr
Craig, that prior to the waiver of tilts requirement, a letter would have
Ill be sthmitte' and signed by the property owners atatlug that :itcy world
agree to thv waiver
January IB, 1978 - Ncmo to Frank Van Pelt, Building and Safety, Ontario,
from Toothy II. Stephenq In which the final inspection of 2C -25 homes is
OK'd by our Department. Memo also states that Ringsway Construction Corp
IN willing to work Out the problems with the property owners (per letter cc
January 18. 1978, from Kingsway CORSLruction Corp to Tommy it Stephens)
�.t•
Memorandum -2- June 29, 1978
January 18, 1978 - Letter from Kingsway Construction Corp to Tommy
Stephens agreeing to Install double - glnzed windows to subject homes and
to obtain written permission from owners
iLirch 1, 1978 - Letter from iangsway Construction Corp to Tommy 11
Stephens stating permission received to Install double - glazing from all
property owners except one. Requesting Planning Department to notify
Frank Van Pelt, Building and Safety. Ontario, of agreement between Plan-
ning Department and Klagsway Construction Corp.
March 1 1978 - Letter from Kingsway Construction Corp to Frank Van Pelt
stall's ht ttttng4 tr, contact Tommy Stephens regarding homeowner approval
for douhlt g11 -,d wIndms
March 8, 1978 - Memo to Frank Van Pelt, Building and Safety, Ontario, from
Planning stating Kingsway Construction Corp agreeinq, to put In double -
glazed windows, in addition, the requirement for sout.d board In the walls
is being waived by the Planning Department Block wall along South property
line not waived - - -
May 16, 1978 - Memo from Lauren N. Wasserman to City Council discussing
problems with the Kingswa- Construction Corp
tiny 24, 1978 - Letter from Tommy 11 Stephens to Kingsway Construction
Corp stating that Lite conditions for a six (6) (nut block wall and otter
noise attenuation mtmsurea have not been met Although tlw 'f' sound board
condition may lie valved, Ice suggested that the oche. conditions be met as
soon as possible,
June 6, 1978 - Follow -up letter from Lauren M. Wasserman to Kingsway Const-
ruction Corp Letter discusses the agreement reached between the City and
Kingsway Construction In which Kingsway agreed to construct a block wall
around perimeter of property, install double thickness glass in the tract
as per the urlginal conditions and correct all other problems concerning
the warranty of the housing tract.
RECOWDENDAT10N: It is recommended that the condition requiring y" sound -
board for all homes In Tract 9440 be waived, Providing the contractor agrees
to construct a block wall around the perimeter of the tract, Installs double
thickness glass In Lite homes within the tract, and works to correct the
warranty problems which have been reported
b
.-City Of
NC1-I0
CUCAMONCA
June 6, 1970
Kr tart R Cohen
Secretary
Kingsuav Construction Corporation
Ito West "A" Street, Suite 59E
San Diego, California 92101
Bear Mr Cohen:
As a follow up to the reeling we hold with the County staff and City staff on
MAY 31, 1 wanted to Indicate that we will be recommending to the City Council
that the condition requiring sound hoatd installation on the Kinqsway Con-
struction tract in Our Cit• bo waived Ilowever, as a part of that agreement,
we want to make certain that Kingsway Construction completes the following:
1. Construction of block wall on perimeter or property As you
are m,nre, a hand has been secured fOr umpletion of the
project• hoc,ev:r, we think it is essential that Kinqsway con-
struct the wa•I as quickly as possible
2 Install unnhle thickness glass in the tract ns specified
in Elie nrininal conditions set forth by the Count/ of
San Bernardino Planning Department
3. (lake evety effort to correct the various PrOhlems concerning the
warranty on the housing tract The City suhmilted to you copies
Of a number or complaints received regard tic? the housing con-
strue Ion Nhi lr wr recognize that all of the problems r -..not
be corrected Ovcrninht, we are expectinq that you will make
every effort to clear up the Issues as quickly as possible.
It would be appreciated if on June 21 you bring with you to the Council meeting
a schedule indication ht>„ yet' will be proceeding with Elie conpletion or the above
requirements In the meantime If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
7
Lauren M Wasserman
�• City Manager
LII4:boa
w Cu T Stephens
1-4 is nI 1 r i Ia„ ,
e
i
� s
• •�'•� >il.ti i r
N E 41 0 R A N D U II
DATC: {lay 16, 1978
T0: City Council
fNOSI: Lauren Nassc roan -
City {Lvna tager q
sunpi.rr: Problems with kings( Construction Tract
On Thursday of this week, i talked with Fir Cohen representing Bingsway
Construct imt Company 'lost of the Conncll Is probably aware that the residents
Of the 124•nntt subd visinn have expressed scrims concerns to title developers
nhout the mmher of problems The primary problem As th.it the postal
service will not provide mail delivery to the area because of the large pile
of rocks in the street the representative of kingsway indicated, first of
all, that any problem, with the (tomes will he taken care of since the com-
pany is concerned aWtit its reputation and Is seckinit satisfied customers
Secondly, there are approximately 30 homes of the 124 home subdivision which
stlll are to need of iaudsc.giing in the front yard areas 0ccausc of the
rooky terrain tit the arca, the contractot has 11.1,1 problems with Iii% sub-
contractor respansyl4e for planting the lawns 111cy did indicate to us, how-
ever, that the problem would be resolved, and they regret the inconvenience
to the home owners
In summary, king• {way is aware of the problem They ,ire nttenpting to resolve
the custumer compl'nnts as rapidly as pussiblc However, I am sure the
Cnuneil is nwnic that hint quickly the complaints are 'esolved, the home owners
sttli are tint going to be sati-afied ife dfacusscd will' the kingsway representa-
tive the fact that 'to did not wish to have these complaints nircd publically
at .1 City Council meeting since the publicity would not be In the company's
hest Interest They understood, and again• lie assured its that adequate
corrective mcasures will he taken to satisfy most of the customers Ono
problem which is living encountered Is that an won as the comn.nty picks up
tale racks which 11.110 been thrown into ti •c <t rr0t, home owners rest.ick them
Probably from the back yard areas Ne do not Wink this is fair of the home
owners, however, It is a difficult problem which is aimost unen forecalA c.
17
1 0 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY ee nIT of Son Berno•dlno
__a
_ _
•• PLANNING DEPARTMENT I;r;.rt �'•° -' "— "' ^ -� •
1111 East h411 Street, BIJq 1 San B,,W,d,no, CA 92415 (71413,13 1417 1 e�'D.roor.
May 24, 1978
Kingsw'ay Construction Co
110 Wc3c "A" street, Suite 590
San Diego, Ca. 92101
Re: Tract 944G - Rancho Cucamonga
Bear Sir:
Page 7, linea 47 through 54 of the conditions of approval for the -
above referenced project states that:
Walls of houses within 400 feet of the railroad right -of -way
and exposed to the noise source or aro in line with a reflective
surface and potentially receives noise shall be provided with
full batt insulation, 1/2 inch thick sound board and double
glazed windows Such sound attenuatinn materials Shall include
but are not limited to all walls facing the noise uiurce on lots
16 through 36 and all second floor walls facing the noise source
in units within 40.^, feet of the railroad right -of -way.
Our Building and Safet lepartment informs me that neither of theac
items have been accomp, hod and the appropriate connection notices
have been issued As pr.viously stated, it may be possible to have
the sound board requirement waivt3 by the Rancho Cucamonga City
Council should you be able to obtain the concurrance of all of the
affected home owners for the waiver of this condition There is
also a six (G) foot block wall shown along the west property line
on the approved grading plan. At the time of our last visit to the
project site, this wall had not been erected
We would strongly suggest that the above mentioned items, which
were conditions of approval for this tract, be satisfactorily
taken care of at the earliest possible date.
Very Truly Yours,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY
PLANNING DEPARTMCNT
Tommy 11 SLCphons cc: Lauren Wasserman,
Senior Planner City tlanager
West Valley Planning TIIS:CD:nk
1 Mn
I'r I'I r 1 U Ir•:rH.l r /11 r .r n �
111X11111 U In i,Pf ♦ � I ' 1 ' n 1 n•• r n•,1 ,r
JgtRy' 4
•it
. 1
This is to confirm your telephone conversation of
March 3, 1978 with John Perevuznik, a member of My staff. - -
Kingsway Construction Czmpany had agreed to Put in double -
glazing at the rear of said homes in above referenced
tract in all windows as a noise attenuating barrier The
requirement for sound board wall requirements was waived
by this department The requirement for the eight (8) foot
blcck wall along the south property line (lots 16 through 36)
as shown on the tentative tract map was not waived.
(Reference page 7 of 8, lines 37 thru 43 of standard requirements)
Sincerely,
FNVIRONNENTAL IIIPRO%;EMENT /A /AGGEENN�CY
PLANNING DEPARTTae� /`"�
TonunY� Ist Planner
West Valley Planning Team
THS:JP:nk
cc: Kingsway Construction Co.
Tract 9446 file
9 ti'
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
DATE
March 8, 1978
:a:•IYs
IGr u,�uon3
FROM
Tommy H. Stephens, Senior Planner, Ext. 3691
West Valley Planning Team
TO
Frank Van Puldt
Ontario Office, Building a Safety
SUBJECT
Sound Requirements for Tentative Tract 9446
This is to confirm your telephone conversation of
March 3, 1978 with John Perevuznik, a member of My staff. - -
Kingsway Construction Czmpany had agreed to Put in double -
glazing at the rear of said homes in above referenced
tract in all windows as a noise attenuating barrier The
requirement for sound board wall requirements was waived
by this department The requirement for the eight (8) foot
blcck wall along the south property line (lots 16 through 36)
as shown on the tentative tract map was not waived.
(Reference page 7 of 8, lines 37 thru 43 of standard requirements)
Sincerely,
FNVIRONNENTAL IIIPRO%;EMENT /A /AGGEENN�CY
PLANNING DEPARTTae� /`"�
TonunY� Ist Planner
West Valley Planning Team
THS:JP:nk
cc: Kingsway Construction Co.
Tract 9446 file
9 ti'
v .r
larch 1, 1970
Hr. rrank V&n Poldt
County of Still Darnardino
325 E. 'C° St.
Ontario, ca.
Ito: Tract 944C
Dear Mr. Van Peldt:
As pertains to the aforementioned tract I enclose a copy:
Of my lntter to Ton Stephenc of Plarning which Sher,
complied with by us appeared to solve the problem
After ny conversation with you I i.rote to Tom Stephens
rnquestinc, cor.£irr.;ltion to you of our anrr_emcr•t %,ith the
County. I will attemnt to contact him directly but he
is Cifficult to net on the phone As indicated in :.y
letter Lo tlr. Stephons we secured homeowner approval and
installed double gla:iny.
Vcry truly yours,
Earl E. Cohen
Secretary
ERC:mc
Enclosure
•'n
• U' L(/ll��IIUIC� UO /l,�IfiZIIC�C�Il U4�O�11C�C4�lTi
Mach 1, 1978
air. Tom Stephens E JOS, Environmental improvement Agency East Mill, Bldg. 1 San Bernardino, Ca. 92415 Re: Tract 9446
Dear fir. Stephens:
With regard to the aforementioned tract 2 wish to refer
to my letter to you of January 18, 1978 wherein the
noise attenuation problems were discussed.
As set forth therein we received permission from all
homeowners except one (house was vacant and had 'for
Salo• sign) and instilled all the double glazing, includ-
ing the vacant house.
We have now received from the Building Department a
Notice of Correction pertaining to the problem.
We would appreciate your contacting Crank Van Peldt and
advising him of our agreement. tae have performed our
part of our agreement with you and feel that the Build-
ing Department should be so advised and that we should
be advised in writing as to the approved changes in the
Condition of Approval. Thank you in advance for your
patience and assistance.
Veep t Y s,
Earl R. Cohen
Secretary
ERC:mc
f:.
cc: Prank Van Peldt
Building Department
I IOtYna A Street. Suite 390 w San Diego, Call. 92101 1 711.212-6469
w
•'n
• U' L(/ll��IIUIC� UO /l,�IfiZIIC�C�Il U4�O�11C�C4�lTi
Mach 1, 1978
air. Tom Stephens E JOS, Environmental improvement Agency East Mill, Bldg. 1 San Bernardino, Ca. 92415 Re: Tract 9446
Dear fir. Stephens:
With regard to the aforementioned tract 2 wish to refer
to my letter to you of January 18, 1978 wherein the
noise attenuation problems were discussed.
As set forth therein we received permission from all
homeowners except one (house was vacant and had 'for
Salo• sign) and instilled all the double glazing, includ-
ing the vacant house.
We have now received from the Building Department a
Notice of Correction pertaining to the problem.
We would appreciate your contacting Crank Van Peldt and
advising him of our agreement. tae have performed our
part of our agreement with you and feel that the Build-
ing Department should be so advised and that we should
be advised in writing as to the approved changes in the
Condition of Approval. Thank you in advance for your
patience and assistance.
Veep t Y s,
Earl R. Cohen
Secretary
ERC:mc
f:.
cc: Prank Van Peldt
Building Department
I IOtYna A Street. Suite 390 w San Diego, Call. 92101 1 711.212-6469
",f atii r t .
r
��r�Jr�l��� UQ1l,�llIIG�C�IG U���G2'� {C�IZ
January 18, 1978
Mr. Tom Stephens
E�vironwental Improvement Agency
1111 East Mill Bldg 1
San Bernardino, Ca. 92415
Re: Tract 9446
Dear 11r. Stephens:
This letter is intended to acknowledge our understanding
with regard to the sound proble4.s that pertain to the
ha--es we :tnve built in Tract 9446 which are adjacent to
the railroad right of way.
We agree to put in double glazing at the rear of said
homes in all windows as 3 noise attenuating barrier. This
work will cummence immediately upon receipt of the windows
which are now ordered. We will contact each concerned
home owner to secure their permission in writing. When
we have contacted them all we will send you copies of said
letters.
C r further understanding is that you will present the
P )blem to the City Council for waiver of the sound board.
We appreciate your hajp in this matter and we will do
our part to solved OE pro lem as agreed.
V¢ry rt my � u s/,
Earl R. Cohen
.iecrotary
j' ✓q y �flVfn
ERC:mc ( 20 1S)
q a _
4'
Is C'
1101KalASItmt.Suitc590 • San DicSo.Cslif. 92101 • 714432,6469
i
J
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY i — eo.my of son stmordloo
PLANNING DEPART161ENT -• •reins hurt
1111 Eatt tr411 Sbeat Slay l San iWlwdlno, CA 92415`(7141383-1417 •l •I
li.l.
January 11, 1978
Darrell Craig
c/o Kingsway Construction Corp.
1911 Burmuda Dunes Court
Ontario, Ca. 91761
Re: Tentative Tract 9446 - Noise Analysis
Dear Mr. Craig:
Our Department has reviewed the letter from Diu - Acoustical
Engineering Corporation dated October 5, 1977 concerning the
level of noise generated by the railroad track located adjacent
and to the south of this site. Bio- Accustical 1ingtncering has
stated in their letter that vibrations generated from the rail-
road track would not be a major source of concern for Tract 9446.
Therefore, based upon the information provided, our Department
had considered wdiving the reyutremencs concerning the noise
attenuation metsures which were to b_ provided for those lots
within 400 feet of the railroad right -of -way (pg 7 of 8/
lines 47 -54).
Ifowever, since the receipt of the Bio - Acoustical setter, our
Department nas received complaints frcln [he property owners
living within Tract 9446 concerning the noise generated
by the passing trains. The property owners have indicated
that the number of train trips varies from dal to day, how-
ever no one .'ay there were 15 such occurances, 7 of those
were at night. During the passage of trains, it is not pos-
sible to carry on a piicne conversation as has be -n indicated
by the property owners
Therefore, prior to our Department taking any action on the
(wise attenna Ll on rwasures, we would request thaL a 1>tter
be submitted and signed by the property owners of Tract 9446
stattna Jlat they \,••fill agree to the waiver of full butt in-
sulotaon, I, inell thick sound boars: and double glazed glass
windows. Pleise have the property owners include their mail-
ing address and poone number.
N141 of Of IIq.111 I u 111 Pr..In r.l
1 r... ... „ I I ^�1'.1 1 \.111111 1 1. � r r.n •Y •i 1.. �1 I• •r rl
Tract 9446 - Nolse Analysin
January 11 1978
If you should have any fui_ner questions
pleasC contact this office
regarding this matter,
at Area Coca
714/383 -3691.
Sincerely,
ENVIRONt1ENTAL INPROVENENT AGENCY
( /PPPLL1I{A r1NNNINNGDE.P�A�RTMENTT
1�.1 -v ��L� ✓v'� -V fw'
�FCu
�Sk ticW
Associate Planner
West Valley Planning
FM:nk
s
0
K'"C -5wAy Co.75rtver•VAr
weiv ry `� Ql4vtsr 6c O
F04
. 7. 0 ` 76/615 504V000 47M.frq&4Arf•U
810 ACOUSTICAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION
1101 East &µI Sued. SsAe F • Tusln, WNW 9765) • 171418775710
October 5, 1976
Mr. Thomas O McCutchan
HcCutchan and Associates, Inc.
7100 Cast Coothill Coulevard
Pasadena, California 91107
Subject: Railroad Noise Analysis for Tentative Tract 9446
in San Bernardino County
Dear Mr. mcCutchani
As requested, we have examined Tentative Tract 9446 for rail-
road noise exposure.
The tract is bounded on the south by the A.T 6 S F tracks.
Information from the railway company gives the maximum number
of train passages as five per day, with one of the train
passages occurinq during the nighttime hourb of 10 p m to
7 a m The property line is 50 feet from the tracks, with
tho nearest building line planned at a distince of at least
100 feet Based on the5c parameters, the noise exposure to
the tract from the railroad was examined.
The federal government cites an Ldn (C!IEI,) value of 55 as the
maximum acceptable level outdoors in residential areas.l
This it considered a conservative standard by many local
governments in California, such as Orange County and the City
of Anaheim, which use 65 CNEL as an exterior exposure
criteria for residential areas.
The exterior noise level for Lots 16 through 36 along the
tracks will have a maximum Ldn (CNIII,) value of 65 at 100 feet
from the tracks with no shielding.? Although the peak levels
from a train pissby are attributed to the locomotive, whose
effective source height is relatively high, the levels decay
quickly to those associated with the train cars The chief
source of noise from the cars is associated with the rail/
wheel interaction which ancurs at a low height, 1 e , at the
track grade level, and is most effectively dealt with by walls
of reasonable heights
Mr. 'Thomas 0 McCutchan October 5, 1976
RCCULChan and Associates, Inc. Page 2
'Pile construction of a berm /wall Combination similar to that
reromnh,ndcd in the Luntativc trneL map imiy be expected to iiro-
vlde aLtrnoation in the order of magnitude of 10 lIB, bringing
file noise level on the property below an Ldii value of 6U.
'Ihe attenuation provided by the barrier will depend on certain
fetlnrs such as final greding and house locations on Lhe
pioper Ly.
Tho t'alifutnia Nome Insulation Standards require an interior
1101-10 level I.Ot to axceed an Ldn (CLLI.) value of 45 for multi-
family ly dwellings Many local governt.wnLS in the state also
apply this criteria to detached rbsidont ial units such as
those planned in 'tract 9746 I: Lwo story urii LS are constructed
on these tots, other mitigation measures will have to be
considered, rush as extra sliength glass
'rile tentative tract map sholas that all OLh,,r bmi::es and lots
on the property will br: greater than 20o feet from the Lracks.
These lots ..nil houses will require no ::pccial attenuation
measures to dchtcvo extol for and irlurior 1"tn vilucs of 65
and 45 rv!aJ CLivciy Too use of extra slrcuyth glass in
necoud Gory windo.rs facing the track.- coult' he ,ons:dercd
for lots 16, 67, and 51 through 37 This t.onld t -oducc any
annoyance to residrn LS sleepiny in the -ecuud :.LOiy
It should be no Led that this tract will t.teel IIUU /FIIA - Landards
for railroad noise pruvulud all houses are at least, 100 feet
from the track5.3
Dio- Acoustical EngtnLCring has a.onducted vibration measure -
nu•uLU on houses 10C. Led within 10.1 fuut of railroad tracks.
Although these moo GUi{•irents ShOMNI Lhc vibration luvcls inside
the structure to be holow the %ubp:et.vu sung of "barely
percepu ble ", the levels at any specific site ere highly
d.ln udwt on tonal ntolvgical :ot•ditions It is not eel,ucted,
hut,ovvr, tl,oL vibrations will be a iriior bourse of ooiiecrri
for 'tract 9446
If we can provide further .isbistance concerning this matter,
pleaso call us 1:0 appreciate Lhc opporLUnlLy to :.crve you
and hope that we may do so again in the near ,fjuutture.[/
Cheryl It, riobcrts Otto C Rixlerf/Jr.
k:ngine,•t (tanager of Enginet ring
Rio - Acoustical Engineering Corp. Uto- Acoustical Engineering Corp.
CRR /OCd /imb
0 0
u v
RCFERCNCCS
Environmental Protection Agoncy, "lnformalion on Levels
of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health
and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety ", March 1974.
Swing, Jack 11 , "Simplified Procedure £er Developing
Railroad Noise Exposure Contours," Sou,,d and Vibration,
February 1975, pp. 22 - 23
Housing and Urban Duvelopment Noise Asscs;.ment Guidelines,
UDN Report No 2174, August 1971.
•
Tract_ No 94.16 (Cucervgal
•
Palle 7 of 0
(7c Luber 21, 1976
1
_ 2
(5) feet in vertical height, as well as any inaccessible lo[
art•.a created by a
]
gradod slope in excess uC tun (10) feet in
vertical h(•ight. shall not reduce the
4
u:.eable port.lon of the lot
to less than IU0 percent of Lhv f Lh
I 5
peunlllvd mtnunum lot
G
7
A 7,200 ,.quarc feet - 1002
B
li 01500 aqu.lre fel•L - 90.
.
C. 10000 square fevt - 75:
10
D 14, uU0 rqu•u'o feet - 70"
• 11
L 20,000 squele feel. - W.
[, 12
13
Landscaping and irrigation shall be provldcd for all
"lopes In
14
graded
execs; of five (5) feet in vortical height Where
graded slopes exceed
15
a 3 to 1 ratio and exceed Len (101 feet in
ver Llcal herajhL, Llley shall be
h. lb
covert•d wr LII )utQ matting, or
similar, and plan LuJ 191 aesthetic
17
groups:
j; tli
19
Trees (50: 15 gallon /50L 1 gallon minimum) -
.
S11
one
250 square tcct of slope area Per each
b =1
22
Shrubs (1 gallon minimum) - one per each 100 square feet
" 23
Ground cover as required.
24
• 25
r 26
1lie malntm ;jujl of graded slopeS and landscaped nrcas shall be
the rship
27
UWIICr5111p (+1. 1t11LII the
(,,bully of Lhv devvlopor until Ill, transfer Lo individual
c8
hldillLenallve 19 Ufticlally a9Slllllcd by a
rounty Service Arco
29
.I 30
!li 31
All irrigation systems where required shall be designed on an
Individual 10L basis
32
unless cotmnonly malnLUlned In an applorcd
manner
it 33
U 34
e 35
Cl'a m 95 1s dQflclent In area Said lot shall be adjusted to maintain
a minimum of 7200
square feet.
37
30
n buffer area lU foul lu qh blo<•k vall) sh.111 be provldcd along
lire south pl uprl ty ilItu (lots lu
39
thrumh lt.l
a colnbin•It)un of a 2 1 5.nd buCfcr may be
40
- 41
wall 1n the event saldtb)Qrmttar.(Irwal l�c�anbl
G 42
na LionutslluuclUIt Lhk
block wall. shell be conxtrnc[vU on the
43
propl�rL line
cant shall obt.atn an encroachulenl pulmll tram the railro
the burro LO
`+,c
4 4
ad tod)allow
bd ,•U08LrlICLed on Lhe railruad a ghL -of -way,
45
?r 46
(louses on lots 16 through 36 shall be
47
one- story.
>lialls
1�1 40
of houses vldlun 400 feet of the railroad rieht -of -way
aU w Ule nulsu
j 49
and
source Or are in Llno Willi a ref decries sur-
fact-
face and poLlone ly receives
50
noise 311,111 be I)rOvided with full
iwindows 1/1 Inch thick isound board
j, 52
glas
rylas9 M111dOW9 St1011 90lllld at.11•IlUatin(jn1.l
(1911411 91C1U(1Q
53
16C arc• IIUL' I1m 11, I
t0 .111 wad l.3 fllcillq Lhe nolue
1G th rough
54
Ild sourco on lota
]G .nut all svcun <I floor w,111s lactnl
Ln
r
55
source
unite striae doll f,•eL of the "ilruad
�.
rlghL-of'wayulse
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 28, 1978
TO: City Council
PROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
SUBJECT: Equipment for Community Development Department
You will note an We..nesday's City Council agenda, a rather extensive list of
equipment needed for the Community Development Department While the cost is
quite high, please remember that -mast of the Stems being purchased represent- -
a one time cash outlay They will not be repetitive expenses. It to also
Important to note the proposed expenditure for radio equipment for our
vehicles. In addition to being used on a day to day basis, it is important
In our view, to have the radio communlcatlons available particularly during
the rain atom season. If the Council wishes to delete the radios, we could
either rent or purchase outright paging devices which could be warn by the
Building Inspectors However, it Is quite probable that in the future we will
still be dealing with a critical need for radio communication equipment My
view is that we should try to purchase the equipment as we purchase each of
our vehicles rather than waiting until we have an entire fleet to equip The
radios proposed would be commercial radios. Citizen band rndlos are less expensive,
however, they have proven to be very ineffective as well no impractical for
City operations
Undoubtedly, the City Council will have questions regarding some of the
equipment proposed by Jack. I would suggest that you contact Jack or me
regarding your specific questions The proposed list is a further example
of the types of unanticipated expenditures which must be dealt with by newly
Incorporated cities
LMW: lk
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JULY 28, 1978
TO: CITY COUNCIL
'ROM: JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF CO,iM LAITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: START UP EQUIPMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTTENT
Certain pieces of basic equipment arc necessary for starting up a Planning,
Bulldirg and Engineering function City business cannot be conducted
witho-.t this equipment. I have compiled a minimal list of equipment which
are high priority items In pricing these items, we have neither selected
the best nor have we selected tho cheapest but have selected equipment of
a quality that will last rather than need replacement In a short term. It
would be foolish to purchase equipment only to have to replace it ev ry
several years It should be noted that much of the equipment on this list
are one time only costs and will not need replacement. Equipment snah as
the overhead projector, the slide projector and the microfilm re:,der will
be shared by all departments In the City and will be utilized for City
Council and Planning Commission meetings Equipment such as the measuring
wheel, the steel tape and to- tape may be utilized by Community Services,
as well as Community Development Although the list of equipment may seem
expensive, the equipment listed is only minimal and addresses only the
immediate needs for the department and may not include other start up
equipment that may be necessary inter in the year It should be noted that
the department is starting fray scratch and has no equipment to start with
R,.COMPENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the purchase of start up
equipment for the Community Development Department In an amount not to
exceed $20,500 00 from the City's contingency fund.
peel submitted,
JACA LMI, D: rcc for o
Community Development
JL:dm
COtDRN1TY DEVELOPMEW DEPARTMENT
START UP EQUIPMENT LIST
ITEM
Ozalid Solution
Ozalid Machine
Print Paper
Overhead Projector
— Carousel Projector
Traffic Counters
r— Projector Screen
Traffic Count Boards
48" z 72" Visual Boards and Markers
Tape Recorder
Micro Film Reader /� �-
Transcriber
Engineering - Calculator
Inspector's Ladders -
Calculator (Printing)
Tape Measures
Drafting Board Covers
Small Tools
Magic Markers
^ Tape
Prestypc Assorted
Civil Engineering Manuals
Easels
Planiceter
(land Levels
Safety Vests
Traffic Cones
Pocket scales
Plumb Bobs
Right Angle Mirror and Scabbard
Leather Scabbards
Rag Tape
100' Steel Tape
Tape Wheat
Flagging lope Assorted
Warning Signs
100' Cloth Tapes
Pocket lal+es
Folding Rules
Tension liandle
Measure Wheel
ase Station
Antenna
ommunication Units
Inspection Card Piles
v
ESTIMATED
COST
$ 80 00
4,700.00
200 00
300.00
180.00
2,000 00
100.00
400 00
300 00
175.00
800 00
300 00
500 00
200 00
250 00
25 00
100 00
75.00
50.00
50.00
ISO 00
100 00
ISO 00
400.00
180.00
100 00
20 00
25 00
20 00
120 00
10.00
20.00
300 00
100 00
50 00
80.00
so On
25 00
30.00
60.00
100 OD
2,000 00
1,000.00
2,400.00
700 00
FO.OTH /LL FREEWAY ASSOC /AT /ON
July 27, 1978
James C. Frost, Mayor
City Council Members
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P 0. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mayor Frost 6 City Council:
The Foothill Freeway Association has worked extremely hard for a -
number of years to do what is required to instigate the construc-
tion of the Foothill Freeway from Damien Avenue to I 15. This
freeway not only has tremendous circulation requirements, that will,
according to Caltrans studies, impact severely our existing street
system if it is not constructed to current master plan widths; but
also has within it, Flood Control designs, that if not implemdnted
in some areas, will cause a complete rethinking of storm drain
designs as well
The Ontario International Airport, as it grows, will contribute
extensive traffic loading on Route 10, as shown by Caltrans pro-
jections of April 1977. These factors create a large regional
significance for our area and not just a small problem as outlined
by the State of California recent report. ale think it is time that
the people of our region have the opportunity to vote their support
for the freeway. Therefore, we are requesting that your City
Council do what is required to out this before the voters in the
next up coming general election to be held in November. This will
enable our area to speak as one instead of a fragment and will be
the one opportunity for all of the people to give their opinion in
this very serious matter
We will appreciate your assistance, and will work with you in any
way p093ible to acheive this matter being placed on the ballot.
kn
Sincerely,
Harold A Bailin
President
P.O. Box 13C9, Upland, California 91788
Telephone 17141 9829818
Fr
P
:w :d lrrroraj�
16 M0randUm
e
o ,1W' airman and Members
California Transportation Commission
•n a DEPA019MT OF raANSPOaTAnON
m''anaeA oz.
•
aurineee and Traftsport.t.,
on Agency
ZfeA
0010 1 June 9, 1978
rile No., 07,08•LA , SBd-
t
2.S/7.7;0.0/23.1
iJ* Rentt Iayentory -- Recycle Resolution No. NIU -78 -2
REC6?C-- t 'D-- ATIoN:
I have reviewed the information contained in the attached resolution
mnd ve review
I Concur in the recommendation that racy
clin
to consider aescinding the adopted freeway ocutioedures be initiated n 'or Route 30 Los Angeles and San e sever Counties between Damien Avenue and
Route action.. There are several pertinent reasons for recommending in
this action:•
1. we do not have enough money -- State only FAU, or
for '- to build this freeway, either now or in the
foreseeable future.
2- Route 30 is not a "Now" need. Congestion today in the
Corridor is minimal. There are many other areas in
the Los Augeles' region and around the State where
congestion today is moderate to severe, and these
IV av ailable. a'e a higher priority for Smprovemonts if money
re available.
3- Route 30 is not a highway of statewide significant -,
The State has already built two parallel freeways -
Interstate 10 and Route 60 -- to handle statewide travel.
Local governments are no longer able to protect the
corridor right of way indefinitely, until either they
have the money locally to construct the freeway or
statewide priorities eventually .•hange:
d. The travel forecasts for the car -ldor may be high. Even
though these forecasts have beef revised to reflect a
smaller projected regional population and a greater,use
'Of transit, the forecasts do not take into account
strategies that may be required to implement the Clean
Air Acs nl to respond to energy constraints (the forecasts,�"P'
assum0 unlimited supplies of gasoline into the 1990's
price rifirg at the same rate as the over -all consumer;, --
]price Cost al Evan with current earsr� fit e:_e1LL:-� 1*K
141rr Lost alternatives to
G
s
Page 2
June 9, 1978
9
07,08- 1,A,88d -30
2.5/7.7; 0.0/23.1
Because of the high public interest in this route matter, the
Transportation Commission should consider holding hearings at
the conclusion of the process prior to making a final decision.
j.
C41't.t(i r�) ! %,c it +t�LL tL•:
ADRIANA GIANTURCO
Director of Transportation
TO: Ms. Adriona Gianturco, Director of Transportation
FROM: Mr. C. E. Forbes, Chief Engineer and
Mr. Peter R. Oswald. Deputy Director, Planning g Programming
RECOFPfEN DATI ON
It is recommended that the Transportation Commission initiate recycling
to consider rescission of the adopted freeway location for the 28 -mile
segment of Route 30 from Damien Avenue to Route 1SE, and that the
attached Resolution No. NIU -77 -3 be adopted.
BACKGROUND.
This report on Route 30 is a part of a series of reports and
recommendations covering route inventories of adopted but unconstructed
freeway routes for which r+ght of way and construction probably cannot
be financed in the foreseeable future. The purpose is to evaluate
current status of adopted locations and reed for acquired lands as
future highway right of way. This review was initially requested by
the Highway Commission at its May 1972 meeting. Procedures for
recycling were adopted by the Highway Commission on April 17, 1973
and modified on January 24, 1974, March 20, 1975, and January 19, 1975,
On May 19, 1978, the Transportation. Commission passed Resolution No.
G -8 readopting these procedures.
The subject Route 30 segment was included in the listing of initial
Phase 2 Route Inventory /Recycling candidates approved by the Highway
Commission at the June 16, 1977 meeting. It is locally known as the
Foothill Freeway.
ROUTE INVENTORY
A Route Inventory Report was jointly prepared by Districts 07 and
O8 in late April 1977. Copies of the report were sent to the local
agencies, legislators, and regional transportation planning agencies.
Page 3
June 9, 1978
07,08- LA,SBd -30
2.5/7.7; 0.0/23.1
Highlights of the report and other important points regarding the
project are presented here:
o The 28.3 -mile freeway location was adopted by the Highway Commission
in 8 actions between 1949 and 1963. Most of the route has been
adopted for over 20 years.
• Freeway agreements were executed with all affected local agencies
in the general period between 1962 and 1966.
• Approximately $10 million has been expended to acquire about S00
parcels. This represents approximately 50 percent of the area
needed for freeway development. Disposal value of the parcels is
estimated to be in th, nge of $2.6-million, as improvements
have been cleared from a right of way.
• The right of way of the proposed freeway has generally been pro-
tected by the local agencies by tract map planning. However, the_ _
City of La Verne has been forcdd to approve development in the path
of the freeway. Similar development pressures are building up
in the cities of Claremont and Upland. If the right of way were to
be protected, hardship and prute=tion costs could approach $500,000
per year for the next two years and be about $200,000 per year
after that until all developable land is acquired. The total right
of way remaining to be acquired is estimated at $9.5 million.
The estimated cost to construct a four -lane freeway is approximately
$120 million. This includes approximately $9.5 million for
acquisition of remaining right of way (300 parcels) and $3.2
million for utility relocation.
Roadway alternatives to freeway development include (1) build State
exp.cssway on adopted routing - $57 million; (2) build conventional
State highway on adopted routing - $45 million, (3) no construction
on adopted routing, but widen and upgrade other parallel arterials
and highways, both State and local - 548 million, and (4) widen
existing State highway to multilane arterial - $19 million.
(Although not estimated in the Route Inventory Report, certain
mass transit concepts might also be considered as alternatives
to freeway development Future studies need to be made to
de• ermine cost and feasibility.)
Most of the route was adopted in the 1950's in anticipation of
early urbanization of the corridor, which failed to materialize.
However, the westerly end of the corridor is now undergoing rapid
development, resulting in increasing localized traffic congestion
and planning- conflicts with the freeway itself.
�1
Pngc 4
June 9, 1978
•
07,09- LA,SBd -30
2.5/7.7; 0.0/23.1
o The communities on the western end of the freeway corridor --
La Verne, Upland, Claremont, and Rancho Cucamonga -- have been
growing rapidly. Since 1975 their population has risen from
about 110,000 to about 130,000. This growth is continuing:
12,000 new housing units, representing perhaps another 40,000
population, are now either under construction or in the permit
process.
• The most recent growth plan of the Southern California Association
of Governments shows a 1990 population of about 195,000 for the
western end of the freeway corridor. It seems likely that this
Population level will be reached before 1990, but sustained high
growth rates beyond 200,000 population cannot clearly be
anticipated since there are limits on other services such as
water supply, sewer, and drainage.
• A primary goal of the Southern California Association of
Governments' regional plan is balanced growth, both residential
and employment, in all newly - urbanized areas. This is not
happening presently here. Most residents seem to be commuting
west toward Pasadena /Burbank, southwest to the San Gabriel Valley,
or south toward Pomona, Ontario, and Orange County for employment.
• Route 30 is not a highway of statewide significance. The State
has constructed two parallel freeways -- Interstate 10 and
Route 60 -- which adequately serve statewide traffic. Route 30
serves primarily lo;alized traffic and commute traffic to other
parts of the region.
0 Route 30 is not a "Now" need. The major parallel arterials -
Route 66 and existing Route 30 along with local arterials --
will not be at capacity over most of their length until 1990
or after. There will, however, be certain areas of congestion,
particularly near the present end -of- freeway in La Verne and
on some of the arterials leading onto Interstate 10. There are
many other locations en the highway system, both in the Los
Angeles' region and statewide, which are moderately or severely
congested now and will continue to operate at capacity into the
Coreseeable future. Priority is generally given to the most
severe problem areas when State highway improvements are programmed.
The project has not been active in recent years because funding
of construction was no longer programmed. At the time studies
were suspended, no work had been started on the environmental
Impact statement.
.Page 5 07,08- LA,SBd -30
June 9, 1978 2.3/7.7; 0.0/23.1
o Proceeding with construction on the adopted routing would
require undertaking most of the project development process,
including engineering studies, draft and final environmental
documents, hearings, revised freeway agreements, etc., to be
followed by final design and acquisition of remaining rights
of way. Lesser some expressway and conventional highway
plans would also need to be studied as alternatives in the
environmental report process.
In the April Route Inventory Report, it was stated that traffic
forecasts were being updated to reflect new and planned development
in the corridor as well as the most recent growth policies of the
Southern California Association of Governments. Tile forecast year
of 1990 was used since the necessary data and traffic simulation
models were comput ^rized to provide a'fairly detailed analysis.
It is important to recognize that these traffic projection, ire
based on the assumptions that an unlimited supply of gasoline will
be available until at least 1990, with gas prices rising no faster
than the general inflation rate, and that there will be no other .
significant transportation improvements in the corridor, such as
a transitway or new HOV lanes on existing freeways. Following are
highlights of the corridor traffic study, which was completed in
late July 1977:
0 Currently a few locations along this corridor exhibit a moderate
amount of vehicular congestion which will worsen due to rapid
development activity.
0 By 1990, without a Route 30 freeway and partial completion of
the corridor arterial highway master plan, there would be more
than 3 times as many congested locations for east -west travel
and more than 2 times as many congested locations for north -
south travel as exist today.
o With the construction of the Route 30 Freeway, the forecasted
1990 corridor congestion would be maintained near current
moderate levels of congestion.
o By 1990, without a freeway and with the full arterial master
plan, congestion on the east -west and north -south arterials
would be nearly eliminated, but the Route I -10 Freeway would
be severely congested.
o With the construction of both the freeway and the full arterial
master plan, congestion of the Route I -10 Freeway would be
moderate.
o By 1990, the Route 30 Freeway would attract ss,000 vehicles per
day in the westerly sector and 50,000 vehicles per day in the
easterly sector. Traffic volumes would increase beyond 1990
as corridor development continues.
o By 1990, if the Route 30 Freeway were completed, there would be
an estima•ed reduction of 1,300 accidents per year, which would
involve 375 injuries and 11 fatalitju:: This safety benefit would
not accrue to the full arterial rris-or plin - i•l n r ci rr .,
6-
Pago 6
June 9, 1978
FINANCING SITUATION:
07,08- LA,SOd -30
2.5/7.7, 0.0/23.1
The freeway alignment for Route 30 presently does not have a
Federal -aid designation. The existing conventional Route 30 is
designated PAU (with a short segment of PAS in the undeveloped
area north of Fontana). If the freeway were proposed for construction,
it could be redesignated either FAU or PAP. The reason this has
not been done is to allow FAU money to be spent on minor improvements
to the existing highway in the interim until a decision is made on
the freeway.
At a cost of $120 million, the State cannot afford to construct
the freeway with State -only funds under any circumstances. The
State highway trust fund brings in about $350 millioTI per year, and
all but about $20 mi'Iion of that is used for maintenance, rehabilita-
tion is growing eveil year, and there is not enough money, even over
several years, to construct a $120 million freeway and ^.here in the
State.
Using FAU money, the State would need to provide $20 million to
match about $100 million in FAU dollars. The e,:tire State FAU
allocation is about $90 niilion per year, with oily about $3 million
of that available in San Bernardino County. Clearly, San Bernardino
County cannot expect to construct much of Route 30 with even a total
dedication of its FAU money.
Using PAP money, the State would need to provide $20 million to
match about $100 million in PAP dollars. The State only receives
about $80 million per year for PAP Route 30 is not a hig,, state-
wide priority for PAP assistance. PAP is currently our most
underfunded category in California, and it isn't reasonable to expect
Route 30 could be built any time in the foreseeable future using
PAP money.
here is both strong support and opposition to retaining the
doption and constructing the freeway. Both opponents and proponents
f the project agree that a decision on the future of Route 30
hould be made soon, so that local planning can proceed with a greater
ense of certainty.
Page 7 071 08- LA,SBd -30
June 9, 1978 2.5/7.7. 0.0/23 1
All of the governmental entities along the route support the
freeway and have shown it in their general plans. All except the
City of La Verne are attempting to protect the right of way by
using their planning authority to require developers to withhold
development in the proposed right of way. The Route 30 Freeway is
included in the SCAG and SANDAG regional transportation plans as a
future freeway. Opposition includes individual council members of
the various cities, citizens, and environmental /civic groups such
as the Claremont 1vic Association, the Sierra Club, and the
Environmental Action Coalition. Most opposition is in La Verne -
Claremont- Upland areas and centers on perceived loss of community
amenities if the freeway were to be constructed.
Assembly Bill 469, as introduced by Assemblymen Lancaster, McVittio,
and Lewis, and coauthored by Senator Ayala at the 1977 -78 Session,
would have required the Highway Commission to allocate funds for
:and the Department to undertake planning, design, and environmental
studies and to acquire rights of way for the entire 28 -mile reach.
The bill passed the Assembly and-was subsequently amended in the -
Senate to require only hardship and protection acquisition on the
portion westerly of Interstate ls. The Assembly accepted the amended
bill. However, it was vetoed by the Governor because no other
transportation corridor has this kind of land purchase mandated by
Jaw and because Federal regulations will not allow Caltrans to purchase
property other than hardship with Federal -aid funds until an
environmental assessment is made. Additionally, the bill would have
short- circuited the decision - making responsibility of the new California
Transportation Commission.
CONCLUSIONS-
It is recognized that the Route 30 Freeway has had a long history.
If built, the Route 30 Freeway would attract a substantial amount of
traffic. However, financia! and environmental conditions and
assessments of continued future resources have changed, and it is
necessary to realistically assess Route 30.
Regional {copulation forecasts have been materially lowered. An
additional highway corridor may not be the best long -range transporta-
tion solution to meet the travel needs of the region. The potential
for mass transportation to serve the Los Angeles -San Bernardino
corridor has not been adequately tested. The possibility of HOV
(high Occupancy vehicle) lanes on Interstate 10 is scheduled for
future study.
The high cast of route development (up to ¢120 million) and its
relative priority indicates funding is not possible in the foreseeable
future. On this basis alone, it is question ile whether the adoption
should be retained Out there are several other basic issues that
bear upon the State's responsibilities.
® a
Page 8 07,08- LA,SOd -30
June 9, 1978 2.5/7.7; 0.0/23.1
Does the State have a full or partial responsiLility to solve
local congestion problems caused by local development' In the
Past, the greater availability of funds and State policies
encouraging growth would have pointed to "yes ". However, we can
no longer afford to subsidize either local transportation or
development. New development should pay its own way, particularly
when occurring on the massive scale being experienced along Route 30.
The principle of assessing new development for the cost of additional
schools and public service facilities is being increasingly applied.
There is also concern that the latent capacity in a new major
Ere eway facilit, for Route 30 would induce further urban sprawl along
the corridor This could further incrdase energy consumption, worsen
air quality, and increase noise pollution +hich would be in conflict
with State urban development strategy goals and with t%c State
Implcaentatirn Plan (SIP) for improving air quality as well as with
SCAG's own gals for regional development.
There appear to be roadway alternatives to the freeway, although at _
a lower level of traffic service: The recent traffic study concluded
that construction of all master - planned local arterials would nearly
eliminate congestion in the corridor (in 1990), but that Interstate
10 would be severely congested. However, this study did not assume
any HOV or mass transportation options. It should be noted that
existing Route 66, on four -lane Foothill Boulevard (lying between
I -10 and Route 30), is underutilized and could accommodate much more
east -west traffic. Widening of this route is possible if necessary,
although the feasibility has not been studied.
The State Office of Planning and Research was asked to review the
Route 30 issue and submitted the following conclusions
The potential rescision or construction of Route 30 raises
a sufficient number of questions to warrant initiation
of rescision procedures:
o It appears that urban dev (.lopment of the area will occur
regardless of whether Route 30 is constructed Some
type of transportation facility may ultimately be necessary
to serve this development. However, early construction of
the route will encourage long- distance commuting and
development patterns which are wasteful of important natural
resources. Therefore, it is appropriate to consider
rescision.
o if funding constraints are such that Caltrans will not
Uc able to build the freeway, Route 30 should definitely
be rescinded. It would be irresponsible for Caltrans to
let local governments continue to make long -range planning
decisions in anticipation of a project that might not ever
get built.
N YY
i
page 9
7ene 9, 1978
07,08- LA,SDd -30
2.5/7.7, 0.0/23.1
A number of local agencies and groups have requested that Caltrans
prepare an environmental impact statement prior to any rescision
action. The implied purpose would be to demonstrate the perceived
adverse effects of not building the freeway. However, such studies
would be a costly paperwork exercise - -the result would be the samo
whether or not the route adoption is rescinded. No treeway would be
built because it is of too low a priority in relation to other projects
competing for the State's resources. From legal and procedural
standpoints, the CEQA environmental process does not apply to pprojects
whit;, arc rejected or disapproved (Section 15075 of the Sta
Guideline to EIR
Guidelines), but only the direct effects of rescision are subject to
CEQA, J. the disposal an= sale of previously acquired properties.
CEQA clearances are obtained after.rescision as part of the property
disposal process.
In view of the above, it is concluded ::at the subject 28 -mile segment
Of Route 30 should be considered E7r rescinding action and that the
Commission should initiate recycl -ng p,.:edures. It is recognized
such an action will be controv_ers•a' _
There have already been requests fog the Department to hold a hearing
on the Route 30 issue. However, *,is could not produce any mo:e
information than could be obtaine, t� ough the comment process under
recycling. The recycling process aers provide for an optional hearing
by the Commission prior to making � final decision. Commission
hcaring(s) would seem appropriat- at that point, which would be after
the comment period and at the time the D,• ^artment's follow -up report
and recommendations for proceeding arc completed
C. E. FO ES
Chief Engineer
Attachment
0%� l�,2�
77A PETER R. OSWALD, Deputy Director
Planning f, Programming
its
A
f
HICHY.AYS — LEGEND-
Teave,sahle suit H,oways
coo 000 00o
Uscm imcled Stile Hgnw+ys
aa00000000000
IPou,. Adooud h um l,.y. c0,v..1 un `
OAUnslmcled Sloe H,phways
4P.4, Na, AUDI.,
® lnleuule 40, ay Humhels
de Slate Hghway Sir Numbers
Qa U.S. Iliphway Numbers
® Lep,sbine Rwle HYmhelT
BAILROMS
H' F,
--
AMTRAK
OIMI Lines
P.apd Trash
AIRPORTS
a + com lcial
Lt,lrury a. PNvale
j
v,
Q
e` ,\
o01Ad0� �•
V `rJi'
• I
A
I IW
C
II
J
•if' �l
If i 1
ITS
Q
o I n �, v v
71�uw'
-v f
un, Ist
Ory
000000
. OD
1 r t
L�
1.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (OCO)
1111 East Mle Street San Bernardino. CA 92415 17141383 2745
July 24, 1978
Mr Lauren Wasserman, City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 733
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Dear Mr. Wasserman:
Count) of Son Bernardino
R ANN $IPACUS
a....m,
Tho Sets Bernardino County Board of Supervisors requests time on the
Rancho Cucamonga City Council Agenda at your regular nesting On August 2,
1978.
Representatives of the County wish to auks a Presentation regarding the
placement of a referendum for elderly, handicapped, andoratu, and low
in.como housing on Lho Noveadaer Cenaral Election Ballot.
Thank you for your assistance.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY
OFF`CE OP CC47AINITY DEVElD ?MENT
t
'0"' ",k: (UawlY
R. ANN SIRACUSA, Director
RAS :DEN :kar
HOUSltr,: FOR ION OR hODERATE INCOHp,
ELDERLY' OR UANDICAPPED NDUSg1Ol31S
PACX� 0 —gyp
Own monaura would allow the COauntoy (City) to develop, to
own housing for low or moderate °^able° the County (City) to Cruet,
conatructtn hab! ProvIduatoue so ,nndeeral and aratcafunde household' o "It which ,c
Y svallabla uea of tai Deed houaehol
co tyamQenezal urdlationstno lac It 9" The author,.. pond Shur not create any new
mantas Po �° does
income housing, ° °f any city or
APPROPRIATIOU, NONE
PISCAL IAPACT. INED INCREASE IN CZTy/COUNTk
1, IN REP M
^gads b° Paae tan been active "°^ 8ernardlno,end the the robabIly w }than the CowttY haves county of
houeoholdsc chauaing for 1. ss tlQ hm in enatrIdentified
uctt 4 and housing
low Moderat
The need for °0p• elderly. or hardScePpad
Aaefatanco
Plan using has be d
visors and the CSt hna be officially !n the urban count
Y Council of each y adopted by the soars Y Rousing
the programs available to meet those recognized federally funded paecogni ed city, Virtuall Super
the fullest extant Some of ha ava'jAbla°9n Lied needs era state oe all of poss ho
County and PartielpatingbcitiesYan funding constraints, be an utilirud to
voter pP4611 Plsr rguicitouto uea Of o area, because ° of Bernardino
federal
and housing uired b Article al oft boos! approval 1s
9 ballot u the
casurea y ° been ub the California P`°9rams. T
he Cities of 8aa stow hav onl CallPrn has
end San Be ernardlnoQ° sul:oltt (and pproved) 1ution,
ed a ed) fn
IMPACTS OP hOP
N pEpERENDUU —� =y
Is !fecal 1978,
San Bern 4 onIno over half of the federal
Publlc a County area could not ,,d b housing tonne
been so 90nciea In rho Count be used b available o to tM
o[ the referondu, r Y or participatln Y private dsvalgx:rs or
Just in 19:8, resulted in aalo Irments, The lack tofar(Ot er than
fedaral houa! 8arstor)
^9 funds over the the Urban Count ,dum authority
next CO years, Y of $51 m1115on in
A Own hnd� U Article xXx V albs public
Privet. NOUeing units within the jurisdlcrion
duvelopera to uao agencies tisanes,
California State n E9uslly Important, lrsure,
using Finance AgoncY PSnancing r
0 1. . 1 6
-2-
for housing dovclopxvnt and it allows lees; a9rncias much greater flexibility
fn anhlatirg private developers to produce [,coded housing The ruferend� -i,
thercoy, atkon available to San Bernardino County a ruhstantial mount of
federal and state lways.i fwnic. 1: also allows the County (participating
City! a variety of nays in wnlch to Improve the housing Provided under
the Programs already in vac in the County
The ro[oreond
is !s not a comi•tMat of any local funds for housing It
me a hors.! Issue. It in arse not a cormittment to accept any and all
housing prolwells submitted in the cocmunity, nor epee it waive any review
or approval procedures normally utilized by heal does it
Voter review
prove' of this veferendwa would make it caslor for localities to control in
conlunetfon with the already appro%ad llouding AssL tanco Plan the quality
and type of aasrstcd lrousing provid.rl In the --- O=unity and to Incur, its
corpatfatiiity with surrourding dovolapm,nc
woo lobs of tax revenue would be caused by this refm erdam, since privately
taxes' housing built deroany of the prw,rwsa authorized pays full
and public! profit sponsored housing may make pay-
ments In lieu of taxes to the city, cebety and speelal districts in which _
I
t Is located Because the roferendsm nukes more federal and state housing
funds Avallable it would tend to boost new construction and thereby in-
crease local tax revenues
3. GEOCAAPf1IC AREA
There are several alternatives related to the geographic description of
the area to be incluitxl in the ballot ldngu090. Tile alternotivoc are listed
bolOW An" can be combined in any way.
A• COUhWWTDE
Tho problem with „i+ ternative is that it is not clear to bond
counsel what woul' , ^n if it
epvtifie clt It Pass" C Countyewide out failed in a
fall. It would Le the bustaltern the Cast likely of tsecuring the needed
housing on it offers the most option.
B. UtIINCDRPOAATED PORTION 0 -�=
71118 is an absolutoly clear, legal area and thn only questions hero are
passage and the oxclusion of cities where come of the greatest housing
noeda exist and whara services are available.
IP.1I110DRMAATtD AREA MD COOPERATING CITIES
in t Becaa hee of the cooPeration agreenenta signed by the cities to Participlte
unity Devclolocnt Block Grant, it is clearly approprjato that
the Board of Supervisors include these cities fn a ruferentlum. PalLlre
in the City with y. P,o For the whole area might preclude the selo of
bonds in that city. Pram the lain" o.° view coverage for needed
housing thin alternative is one bf p;a best. This could be done with
only curtain groupings of titles
r •
D CFOUPIEC OF SPECIFIC CITIFS ANTI UNIycons'ORATCD WNHUNITIES
By naming the apeelfic historical [awns (unincorporated eoamunitios)
all the cities within a specific Supervisoriil District (or other
coherent geographical area) thu referendum could be localized The
disadvantage of thin relates to the historical definition of town
and would require the identification and creation of boundaries, which
could increase the cost of holding the election
E. CERTAIN UNINCCRPORATED C0h.4UNITIES
Again, the historic town m.ght not coincide with existing districts,
requiring the identification and creation of boundaries, possiuly
increasing coats. The selection of coraunities could be related
directly to those which have districts coinciding with historical
town boundaries
The major advantage of this alternative is that the Board could select
only those areas where such housing is desired and thus where the
ballot measure has a greater chance of suece (such as desert areas_
where senior housing is in Particular de- nd)
R:'.00W4L;1DATID1
It is recommended that the Board have two gr graphic area, on each ballot;
1. County -wide (including all cities
1 Thirteen Cooperating Cities (lndepm.
This combination will give taaximum coverage with the beat opportunity for
passage
4 PROPOSED BALLOT IAt7CUACB
"Shall the County of San Bernardino (City of
davelopuent, construction, financing, ) authorize thv
(yua)raphlc area of housing foralowlortmoderatehlncmu, olderly,
ITC ha�xi lcappcd of
pursuant to Articic XXXiV of the California
Constitution housing built /rehabilitated pursuant to this roferendum
shall nit exceed five percent of the vocal housing stock .n this
(geographic area) This measure does not extend permission
for oxponditure of city or county general fund monioa for such housing ^
nit l b
7 /G /78 -XAR
.Houe s�g susz, d.�.
e�ciiQn eS
app
roved
vern homed sloe �In Don° Pr 1 oDPasijun rthav, or" oast
Wing.S+bla g more (Metal centralM hathateoverlPublic
r- -- �ootlrnardlno Cnunt vallableln San treat, whalosom 1 housingma
Sion Y was stir
Th° bar lotY by the board of au• in, lie said the rail `Imtaat
Publlr� Acro oa!ure A In .il or tal ;QontrCould a,Md do Wt. would
Paruo housln ca routd n I7t.
is acluallY 1mende out Instead, it against a subsidized Y retain., da Y III
velor y a a11able �I boWing sub hat it th lHU would realQl at
• vdoPaR Private do nr a Ityl agcrty III I
I diname p acllo Prol,ct throrouif still'
till bloc only
lion { oWpo tutnitne board in, our e1M deo °� of � Iiran000l fit M plan. at al. terns, thrr 01 a week lhercon. wl °ultl resuhranbobe re It all aubie. two In terns to. Ut the tea that rat
6e g6 en 8.tthrr neat aDPeared 1. 1 t Aol Wing °m1nr11onr" ult
Hen,
tal aR,nclesarl lnus would give h, Present dlnR t0 Now
01(h, nWingP munit iorly °� er lsedrrajroamyc, t rn'4rgrpp Rha ah tin Ann SlnePr die
0
Cott
stil rural 1 be pfd another 9 rnf o0 he as UngD the r roliaen4ejnnI sae
i the ° be rcxlvM , that morl Pro ra her.
tot alvldue tell - Monett, aDPlw home *sal It tan a orn qew
th tom -Mu °ttheir voto�r0onlrll IIIThce Proo her et b rrc0 via
H
a +to
1If''
Unless the, [y ed low lro6Cd mr
J ,� „w�_tonien�i d urctar PUannn build ad oeccounly Itv .Y�
0
turreni•lack of votrc°am
morolhan hall of rh.:m
mov a rdor
lion• sin r._ .
on any ho
to
altlles, elvo
slant canstltullonalarltal Yo
'bile) Nulling voter approv
Y or county h h Ing In ^Y
fulr
Idles �a�oningthsi tmonl
for
Ktb� FA for
R R
al
to
i
H: H 0 R A N D U H
DATE: July 28, 1978
TO: City Council Q
FR04: Lauren N. Was
serman /�
SUBJECT: Blue Cross Heal Tnsurance Coverage
As requested by the City Council, the staff met with representatives of
Blue Cross, on Thursday of this week, to determine whether or not a
difference exists between the two policy prnpoaals received by the City
As the Council to aware, one policy indicated that the extended benefits
for major medical would provide that when benefit payments at BOX reached
$4,000 during a calendar year the remaining sun is paid by Blue Cross
The policy, submitted by Hr Tom Gray, indicated that the 100% payment
would be in effect after 80% of-the first $5,000 in eligible charges was
paid
After carefully reviewing both statements with the Blue Cross reprecentatives,
the staff agrees that both provisions, although worded slightly differently,
are In effect identical and provide for the same benefit payment At the
time the proposals were submitted, the proposal prepared by Blue Cross for
Empire Insurance Company used the $4,000 figure. The policy submitted by
Hr. Gray was typed on his letterhead rather than in a formal proposal. The
figure used by Mr Gray was $5,000, however, the wording is slightly different
than that used by Blue Cross. Both statements are correct and both mean
the same thing even though the wording Is different
We have checked with the City Attorney to determine whether or not the City
has a legally blmiing rontract with the Empire Insurance Company for Blue Cross
protection The City Attorney has advised us that we do, In fact, have a
legally binding contract with Empire Insurance Company and with Blue Cross The
only way the Council could rescind the contract would be to prove that the proposal
submitted was in fact fraudulent. we are certain that both agents and the city
staff would all agree that the proposal submitted was In no way intended to
defraud the City. Even If fraud were established by the City Council -- the
Counell,in view of our City Attorney,could not merely rear'nd the contract
and award it to Mr Gray, but we would be required to again seek bids for
the coverage
RECOMfENDATION: In summary, both of the proposals submitted by the two agents
are worded differently but provide for Identical benefits to our employees
However, since the City has awarded the business to Empire Insurance Company
there is a legally binding agreement which, in view of our City Attorney,
cannot be changed at this time. It 1s, therefore, recommended that the City
Council reaffirm the staff recommendation to continue using Empire Insurance
Company as the Broker of Record for the City's Blue Cross Insurance coverage.
However, if the City at some point In the future, desires to seek a change
from Blue Cross to another company, the stuff will seek proposals from our
local insurance agents as well as our present broker
LMW: lk
I
'j
Cam, �4 /-cb Gi' GC.
Mr. Lauren Wasserman
City Manager
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Lauren:
I would like to thank you and the City Council in
allowing us to defend our position regarding the
Blue Cross issue. If not already, I trust this '
will he resolved right away.
Sincerely,
8885 Mustang Road
Alta Loma, CA 91701
FS /jh
e
H E H O R A N D U H
DATE: July 27, 1978
Tot Lauren H. Wasserman
City Hanger
FROM: James N. Robinson
Assistant to City Manage,
SUBJECT: Holiday, Sick Leave, and Vacation For All
Continuous, Full -time Salaribd Employees
The attached Resolution listing proposed holidays, sick leave, and vacation
represents the basic benefits as extended to City employees by virtue of ' -
the election for incorporation with some minor modifications The purpose
of the Resolution is to establish an official policy regarding holidav,
sick leave. and vacation which would be retroactive from the date of incor-
portnlon so that employees hired after that date would not be penalized.
Essentially, the proposed modifications would eliminate two holidays while
at the same time increasing vacation accrual from ten days to twelve. This
change would allow the City Hall to remain open an additional two days while
still providing an equal number of holidays and vacation days for all
contlnuous,full -time salaried employees
A personnel Ordinance establishing a formal personnel system and setting
forth rules and regulations governing the day -to -day personnel administra-
tion of the City 1s currently being prepared and will be presented for
your review in the near future.
1. 1;,at the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga cdcpt the attached
Resolution establishing holidays, sick leave, and vacation for all continuous,
full -time salaried employees.
2. That the holiday, sick leave, and vacation policy be retroactive to
November 22, 1977 so that all employees hired after that date will not be
penalized.
JHR:baa
• s
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIO., ESTABLISHING HOLIDAYS, SICK LEAVE,
AND VACATION FOR AL1. CONTINUOUS, FULL -TIME SALARIED
EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City cf kcncho Cucamonga was incorporated on
November 22, 1977; and
//--�� WHEREAS, it is necessary o establish holidays, sick leave
and vhk.ion accrual schedule for all continuous, full -time salaried
employees
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the following holiday,
sick leave, and va t on accrual schedule is established and will be retro-
active to November 2, 1977
1. HOLIDAYS.
a New Years Day
b. Lincoln's Birthday
c. Washington's Birthday
d Memorial Day
e. Independence Day
f. Labor Day
g. Veterans Day
h. Thanksgiving Day
1 Day following Thanksgiving Day
J. Christmas Day
k Discretionary Holiday (to be taken at employee's
convenience with Department Head approval)
If a Holiday falls upon a Saturday, the preceding
Friday will be taken If a holiday falls upon a
Sunday, the following work diy will be taken in
lieu of the holiday.
2. SICK LEAVE.
a. All continuous, full -time salaried cmpinyees will
earn sick leave at a rate of twelve days per year. Sick leave accrual
would be at the rate of one day per month.
b Sick leave is not allowable to part -time, seasonal,
relief, temporary, or extra -help employees paid solely on an hourly or daily
basis
c. A City emoloyae 1s entitled to sick leave wtth pay for:
` 1. Any bona fide illness or injury
2. Quarantine due to exposure to contagious disease
" 7. Any treatment or examination, including but not
limited to medical, dental, eye examinatlo or psychiatric.
4 Not more thae (11) days of sick leave each
calendar year may be taken in case an employee's presence is required else -
where because of sickness, disability, or death of a member of his or her
immediate family.
7. VACATION.
A. Any employee who has completed one year of continuous
service shall be entitled to twelve (12) working days vacation Any
employee who has completed three full years of continuous service shall be
entitled to thirteen working days vacation. Any employee who has completed
five full years of continuous sorvlce shall be entitled to fifteen working
days vacation. Any employee who has completed ten full yea:& of continuous
service shall be entitled to one additional day per additlancl year completed
UP to o maximuRE mulaCion of twenty days. Vacation accrual would be at
the rate of on;)per month
1 employeeQ not entitled to overtime pay shall be entitled
to five additional d.,ys of vauon each year Any unused portion of the
:t
,i
t
J
•
Page 2
additional five (5) days nay not he carried over into the next fiscal year.
C. The amount of vacation which cay k.e carried over from one
year to the next will be as follows:
ATTEST:
I to 2 years completed: 12 days
3 to 5 years completed: 20 dnys
6 to 15 years completed: 30 days
Maximum accumulation: 40 days
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1978
City Clerk
Mayor
411
3 '
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE OF
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA FOR A SPECIAL CENSUS.
WHEREAS, the last official census for the area which now
encompasses the City of Rancho Cucamonga was recorded in 1970; and
WHEREAS, since the last official census, the City of Rancho
Cucamonga has experienced a phenomenal increase in population; and
WHEREAS, the State of California determines the amount of
State subventions to be paid to incorporated cities an the basis of copulation;
and
WHEREAS, because of the unprecendented population growth in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga since 1970, it is appropriate to request that
a special census be conducted for the comounity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in regular session that the City
Clark is hereby authorized and directed to exocuto on behalf of said City
of Rancho Cucamonga an agreement between the Department of Finance of the
State of California and the City of Rancho Cucumonga relating to preparation
of a population estimate for the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the sold
Department of Finance.
ATTEST;
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1978.
City
Mayor
I, Lauren M. Wassernan, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced
and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
C; at a regular meeting thereof held on Wednesday the day of , 1978.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: July 28, 1978
T0: Lauren M. Nassem n
PROH: Marry Empey
SUBJECT: Consent Calendar Items
Request that additional office equipment and supplies he quoted for the
Clerk Typist position and other miscellaneous items such as:
Desk and Chair 1 ca. $360.00
Forms for printing (cost is unknown) _
Filing Cabinets 3 ea. 200.00
These items are not, cost vise, to warrant formal bid Informal quotes
are all that is needed
11E: lk
COUNTY SURVEYOR `° nTYalsaa 6 """ °' "°
.l • �rueucwoaxsfmaT�
825 Eut Third Sunt San Dlmardi o.CA92a16 171413MI011 �• E°OENEP ENE
July 25, 1978
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Attn: Lloyd Hubbs -City Engineer
9340 Baseline Unit-A
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91730
Dear Mr Hubbs:
i
A, V w
Re: Tract 9397 t 9324
Please place the following item on the agenda for the City of Rancho Cucamonga City_
Council Meeting of August 2, 1978:
Tract 9397 - Lying east of Hellman Avenue and south of Hillside Road
Subdivider: Crowell /Leventhal
Request Board release $2,000 00 to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc , 1260 W.
Foothill Boulevard, Upland, Ca. 91786. Certificate from L H Noreen,
Surveyor, Indicates that all final monuments have been set and he has
been paid In full
Tract 9324 - Lying cast of Jasper Street and south of Hillside Road
Subdivider: Griffin Development Co.
Request Board release $3,650 00 to Griffin Development Company, 19436
Ventura Boulevard, Tarzana, Ca 91356 Certificate from Iflit Madole,
Engineer, inu,cates that all final monuments have been set and he has
been paid in full
Vel truly yours,
EUGENE P. ENE
County Surveyor
CLAUDE 0. TOMLIN$011, Deputy
Land Development Division
CDT /cal
cc: file
RODE FIT A COVINO TON aurJ u1
Cmmly Admrmtyt!eNi.r NANCY SMITH (A1N onb<I D +NIP/DM1kEpRl S.awW Oneu
JOIIN NI. aC nNAR D, M�mnnunor 1n,. n�.^ DENNIS HAN50111GE n Tl,.J Dm, N,
I r.bl,r WOrl, Agenq JAMES MAYTIELD rn,l Ow. , IICDE III 0 TO1M.1f ND la nm Onval
:' I'
DATE June 27, 1970
•
A
INTER - OFFICE MEMO
FROM John R. Shone PHONE 307 -1202
Director of Transportation
TO Lloyd Hubbs
City Engineer
Rancho Cucamonga
EJECT STREET NAB CHANCES - TRACTS 9320, 9351, 9634, 9617 L 9337
b
TRACT 9320: At the request of the Foothill Fire District, it is recoeended
that Manzanita Street be-changed to Cottomnod Way.
TRACT 9351: Due to a conflict in street names, it is recomanded that
Quartz Avenue be changed to Colestita Avenue,
TRACT 9634s Duo to A conflict in -street names, it is rececsended that -
Robards Street be Changed to Regency Way.
TRACT 9617
and
9337: At the request of the Foothill Fire District, it is recommended
that the east /west portions of Matterhorn street be changed
to Chelsea Street.
Due to an error, a portion of Davon Street in both traets
was recorded as Avenida Castro. The developer requests that
this be corrected.
J. G. Galanls, Jr.
/ J :i I!. 5tione
JRS:JFP:BEN:dr `
vn
1 "$07.2 FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT •�� UACAnT1aN
BFI' ..,.alma 0 REVIC
Serving the Commuahte, o/ AUa Loma Cwamongo Eriwartda 17,41 osa 1714
P O. Box 35 — 6627 Amethyst Street
Alta lama, Ca6forma 91701
April 18, 1978
Gary Kuhl, 3n, Traffic System Engineer
San Bernardino County Transportation Department
825 East Third Street
San Bernardino, CA 92415
RE: TRACT 09320 - STREET NAME CHANGE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Dear Mr. Kuhlman:
He would like to recommend that Manzanita Street /Drive be
changed to Cottonwood Hay in the abovenoted tract.
The present name of Manzanita Drive lines up in two separ-
ate locations with Cottonwood Way. This would affect pro-
, posed streets in the above tract between Hellman Avenue and
Amethyst Street. I believe this would meet the master plan
of street designs for the Rancho Cucamonga area and would
y simplify responses to the area for emergency services.
Should our recolmaerlation for the change not be possible,
please contact the undersigned at your earliest convenience.
He would also aTpreciate your contacting us as to your final
a decision on this matter so that we may keep our emergency
response cards updated.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Benjamin L. Mackall
Battalion Chief /Fire Marshal
BLH:va
cc: Barbara Harris, Traffic Section
Dominion Capitol Corporation r
J. H. Wilson, Civil Engineer '
Lewis Homes
• e
e:..
CAMELLIA CT " y�` VALLEY VIEW ST
N W W
n , >
- < N AD S
411950 W
N
'! 22
3 OR 124650
ITANO pp�
a
c
WILSON
€ q
a
ntwo
V�574450
-Y•q
I
a
COTTON WOODWY
COTTONWOOD
108173 155000
MAMJJ!<1,A
G9
p
Al
wANEAM 174
MAN NITA DR
t
vJ
'SUNELOW1,
�•o
n i
< IRADO
�^
1
s F
WOODS
TftAtr
9i'_J
ST
W
<
° ° CT
z
i
v ST
i
t
Si
BANYAN ST
2%
• `
L
s L
BANYAN
ST
•�•� _ ��.
NANCARIN AVE
.9 +
<
11,010
,N
A
F
ti�
8O
a
W
{
J
S
j
�
O
<
N
�
J
0 LEAD 491600 Avg
o
WVA[ILLA R
• =•��
LC60N AV
r
LC1Tbry T /vv
'
a
m
'
o
a �TO,
d'T
e"
eW
�i i
CT C ?S
<
°u5
1694
N7100
LYON o S
�•
<
���"
F
Iu
ORAN
Si
6111S0
t:
A D g
SOVERSE
uISSSO
N
a
"
763
'
I
•�-
y
o S
�
a
N
i i u s
OR 4TA LOwA`
f. AITA LONA j,` DR
113100 ALTA
LOYA DR
ALTA LO"
. }
St /
,
115600
NIOILAND 1
a
Y'FAP 86
J
41600
'Ap OObp eeop
WST e -s
ADEN
A—
Al—t.
NFAP 86 R_
]ppooa
p060 oe-�Q = =pl
WHOHEATHER
opo
ooe
V 0
oppoc
ppp 0000p
\
W.'
i ST
GinBST <
►a4f 11TH
D
N
4n
Y
^
o
p
AN z
NANIL3iN
NANIL ON
wr
111H��j
Y
+
o O
W
NICNONETTE ST
a
.Nn o
i
S•i150
°
j
�qr
t. .
II IF tl•• _-
II "" W
• II 1 � �
_ -_ __ JI
It ,
11 � ROSEBUD SV
It
11 �
II �•• a i a>
Y 3\\ 2 3 0
11 ( p J ¢
c =ocs11 ly 9 � - p M
a
•
II Y,,, \ TR73tT qS S 1
Iz
II 46', \• �
11 c
II �
11
II .j4f I
ii
II
II ADOPTED STATE HIGHWAY 30
aooRa000000e000eoe0000eovooeoo
11 21
Il r,
I
ST
A
FALLING TREE LN
345500
8
BIRCHWOOD CIA
168700
CA n
A,
C
ORANGEWOOD CIA
616350
ICT
0
OLD RANCH RO
609726
it
E
LA RONDA C7
474750
ICT
F
AVENIDA LEON
138700
G
SOMERSET OR
763600
H
KIRKWOOD AVE
467150
:T
J
APRICCT AVE
R
MANDARIN AVE
CT
L
REGENCY Ww
M
5UNSTONE 'T
T
N
EAST WOUO AVE
313100
r• P
DEF.PRROCN ST.
254850
0
MEADOW ST
539250
:T
R
MONTE VISTA ST
5631(00
II
S
MONTE VISTA CT
T
PEPPCR ST
648450
U
GALA AVE
V
ORCHARD Cl
1CT
W
WELSH CT
%
SHIRE CT
Y
APPALOOSA S7
124060
CT
2
EMERALD ST
327000
ST
AA AVENIDA CASTRO 137650
BB MONTARA AVE
CC PLACER ST
00 MATTERHORN ST
EE FF MARBLE AVERT
•\\ Y %f 17100 YONTENE
LA PINE
0 07600
J o
476325
FAU ROG0 SAN BERNARDINO BASE LINE
A VIA SALSIPUEDES
F' I
I
FF
LEMOY - avE
i m o
� pp
ORARGE
615950
ST
CA n
A,
6
I�[
it
00o
�'q•. 4!
U
ao'0000
U U U U U
oevov
U U
AA AVENIDA CASTRO 137650
BB MONTARA AVE
CC PLACER ST
00 MATTERHORN ST
EE FF MARBLE AVERT
•\\ Y %f 17100 YONTENE
LA PINE
0 07600
J o
476325
FAU ROG0 SAN BERNARDINO BASE LINE
A VIA SALSIPUEDES
F' I
I
•..NS�N`'
i
VALLEY VIEW ST
c
O
>
n RO
HILLSIDE e
a' I, RD
t0,
uam st
s
n8aS7
ORCHARD ST ZI
�V
RANCHO ST
0
oW
8
bpi I
0
611m
S
6 6
J �WN
V
a
V
A
,
0
m =� '4 e' pA�O
Y
6E EGHW DDD DR•
N
C
N It465O N
7
..
N
x RENNET ST
OR W
6 ECM AO p Dom'\ °
\
Y0,
$_ °
• "-
�
>0
N
00. :,Z
��>3a4500 Q
WILSON CT o
WILSON AVE i
O�0`6MBRE0 Lt
88i'�0 W \
Z i5 0A
a>
c = =ever
a
pO
9
°
COTTON
ROOD RY
tAAN2IINITG
pp
W° o
,/,\
0 .�
BRILLANT LN
106175
523300
9
ST
MAN ANITL
CA
iW »
AL0 g1
Vp �4<
\yLOEN ST
31i
N m
fU A%15
B/
Q� J
>
°
W
o
>
° VRADO
s
�-
>
MOON CT, L6N 563250 ,.
O UNAOR6T0 E p
RSE
v,
41
o
W o
Q z
a
W
>
u
C0001
_
T a
m J
\W
. ry
m
o
o
15
a
60.822
\ NY
^a
0
M R•►1MM
NCI 4\�N�t•�
.
•°. u
ti
$�ROOEROS
ST
s l
N
NIIN.4VIN AVE
��
$ R
° Malot
RIN
t GIE
uaN�
m R
z
$O
CN
u z s
MON
I16Oi
N
It
N
n
n
N
o
0 v
n
o
4
n
o
I
A
o
I
I:A I LEMON 491600 AVE
0
••�
O
•YLACIIIA O D
IEYON AV
N
m O N
m
o<
O
0
i,
W
•�ti
:1J
fW'"•
t
Et p Ir
Ir
191433
1
>
NI• J
S
N
��'1� O
z
615550
ORANGE
615550
$T
pppp
SO4[gE7 OR
, z t 15551
SDR ERSE
o
II 0 o
7 6) C00
uV.
¢
°
115603
W
z
u i o ALTA LOW OR
115300 ALTA
LOYA OR
m y
R t z
po
2
z
R R
R R_ R
N m FAP 86 m
<
•�
oa
13
�R
vvvoaio oo
U�
cooa�oo
ovvo 0000vvvovvoa
R R 0. S
•GARDEN ST'000
R_
voa
W
m
U Y U
M m 11 11
R A14CHO
HEATHER 313930
W.•
V U
gyp.
30
:32D35T <
Ii TN a' ST
NH
p
:a:%Y.i/fy
'✓ BAN /Z[O
M <W
u
�<
a
oz
gm
�►
Mb
HIM
0.
<
- I
ST
.R
Y Nu
mN
•+W
c
2%
\4O155O_`HAYILTONST
1S(C
Y
' 00
401550 NgN04FET,
°¢
H
O ° ST
IIIMAMILTON St
e W
O QO
+
\HOLLY 8T
• C2Fl0
: °W
N
m'•.
n\^
ry HOLLY
112U75T
R
¢
171317 ST
F uN
'^ °
N QO
i�
;
°
°o
i . A v
L
_ 4TH
Z1
i5n
a
'\.'i. ]!010
)
AVAL–ON U33
S, T
�•� {N„ j
j!pl�
S
S
',•\p• RJ
?
Vv1tTa 0> 3
T
-
MO.' TE V!:TA 5 T
u u
N
l > e
M
?o I
VUi3
F �7 1G3
".ITT
tr, r r
1 •1 ,.
FROM
j MESSAGi
_[L / \('C' /;i. AY— /t/1CT
i1.J n1�— •.77'CZ
1
�1j�- ,r.,`•N ST
T__ 7rr� r'^' .'7Ci^
:7i�'r
^. i ;r it r;'
�!r /•-
i
1 \/in S[ /l!•tT ?�.
��<.^ — /NYi / /�•
��7% ic7Y.t i !.
CC.-- L1' ^SiIC
r
C Ur �s �( /, >. G'� / %�•i� > { %�C, SIGNED
/�'Y,r(.r/'
- Ll ` (•
^„
', /'� u�
'fin \ ✓M�
REPLY it ..:r1.
L
STONED, DATE 4
Rod,f rws IS 472 .. 1.
his. 1 C Y4,� ��,• • 5 / CAN DLEROOD
$•• t! CAL r \ ua W�I ? R
h O
Lf ff[l7 iR O
F' S~ CHURCH ST 271850 it •" z i 23T03
<N J
a° Al q9 Y•JVJ < P O Y W I W 48900
AYINO � S?A � •\� q0� $ o u ftq w a' z u
z CJ
C275750 < ~ SUR v FR OmmO Sf> CfR �A10200 u 168200 BIRCH
ST
04
Cc�1rte' > <~GJ',y14� C RA ON 4 CrCtL,CS HARVARD ST s J = n
RED HILL (m� _ \! \oo yT7 3 _ AogeoB
OUNTRY CLUB OR C0G2 A b' VP 2$8 $ $ SAN BERNAAOINO 715953 RD a Mr7.
r9r CL. B 5t • • O o
\(
I
R q0
µ51L NEa V` \� ! ^. --�
ED P? � BLVD FAU 5066
— S90BS7
�VS \5,•55. ' 649815 PERSIMMON AV
�p0 739875 SELMA AYE >
au 66
D L
MATTEWWRN ST
gm
a'
59• DEVON ST cc DEVON
J LS.OSN R I PLACER 51 1^ a gI ST
SWU�50. q AliAGOCY IBe a � � 2JP0]
A VEJAR W b 4LlE VEIAR
FAU ARROW R066 ROUTE
229250 jjs a{p ��•►
I 0 x.5"V•I1_11 "ti W RURAL
nil ^ > s 7� 11C)
4••IN O73W 0
a° vtu N zo
d z F; � o • '� � �
L
U41A
J
W
J,. R
1V\
W
LJ
9TH
ST
•
x
W
4
R
m g o
L�:so,-pl
:IDE AVE641325 W
q QAmQ
ATCNISON TOPEKA d SANTA FE
ro:
., /viz8THY.• �Yf'J�v.';i�m',:v y / /�S.....
•�
.Yr.�4 C •j
IMIf
..I A4
5u 1•�11.•L I�.
J t
T
OQ
,9 ISO
ST7:
< <<
NOU
°
••JTTT-
4
{�
• J ST
RAYMOND ST A;;
8
W
0', E
Si
i ¢
n
1` J
l
¢ Y
�
• ADAM
ng
n
HIGHLAND
W
9 w W
•
ITN c
z ST•
`ICAMORE Op
W]�q�� 7A3o0
c
S4
eF
T 4
10
L
U41A
J
W
J,. R
1V\
L
1 J 7
I
>4
m
1
RANC;Hu
m Qf a cc L�� FIR:NWOOD ST /
ER ST
00 e 0 v
O1tl Iw PALOALTO ST
t, 634350 A WGSTON is An=
BALSA ST i 4 > w 151900 w BALSA 9T 0 B HEMLOCK ST
� 110200
F 151900 Q 5 R `� C ONYX AVE AYE 6NH0
I u
> a ° St G a OS V/ 0 AMETHYST ST 119800
ANOLL r W MANOR OVE ST. E VAGNOLIA ST 516950
rJ-. ^� 52190
.°. P MATTE GLENWIJOD R }6}651
YEW ST •z u u -,• NUTME Si G MATTERHORN CT 500150
893725 ST u u 39931 0 M LOCKNAV EN CT 6150
N J FINLOCF AVE a667`A
2)NSO • K PLRAMONT CT 635550
r L ROB.]OS ST T02050
410200 U PALO ALTO ST 674550
O ' 1 FLHAI AVE 456100
�^ HEMLOCK ST w 1 O.K5ET CT
S w ASHFORD S i : z 0 STAFFORD Cl
z 1.2J3a. > P YC 6INLET 97 977410
j NORVICK T 4 5 CAIIOLEM000 ST 207200
s T LAYTON ST 459150
3)B
C n T EFFEN Sf U SOMERSET OR 763600
V LA GLORIA OR 474350
f+ W LIBERTY ST 445350
a D S T ST 1 Y HAMILTON S1 TTE ST
�{ P A > j1 1 MIGNONETTE
$ S AF 00.0 ST } 2 CLUB MOUSE OR 241100
¢ ¢
U ))JON r IA PLUSMAN AVE 467900
W BB IRONWOOD ST
3g CC ALOER 6T
ESTACI, 57 Y OD MAGNOLIA ST
-FOOTHILL •M�7 ! r /5066
SOUTH I �6
351541 M4MPSmW ST /
z a 12910) ARROW OHS
LL 1 T'._' CUCAMONGA
0 662575
1
ATCNJSON
12
1'
i t7}y!'{�'• �a2j 05813•oet,.j i'!E ;1i( � •, +., ^ ,' ) :{r' ._ 3},' .r:�. tie.' � ..
4:.
da
,j
ISOM & SCHARF
Alfamgsaf Law
2706 ARTESIA BLVD.
REDONDO BEACH, CA. 90270
I.11 MON= H.15 Tns.wew�a.
TO,' ilyl iYi•O{ea
ORCOORY&S F July 20, 1978 ubl i7a iaai
Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk
9:40 Baseline Road, Suite A
Rancho Cucamonga, California
RE: LOBENSOMMER VS. CERTH
Dear Sir:
Enclosed please find an original and one copy of WRITTEN CLAIM
FOR MONEY OR DAMAGES regarding gn accident between the above-
captioned parties on July 5, 1978, in the city of Rancho Cucamonga
at Hellman Avenue near its intersection with 7th Street, and a
copy of the Traffic Collision Report attached as Exhibit "A"
Please conform the extra copy of the Written Claim and return it
to this office in the self- addressed, stamped envelope enclosed,
indicating your receipt of the originpl
Thank you for your anticipated co-lrtezl and cooperation in this
matter If you should have any qucoriona concerning the enclosure,
please do not hesitate to call my office
Sincerely yours,
.f41 i .
0 V ISOM
LHI:pls
Enclosures
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
too
N 9
t - ,
YC
WRITTEN CLAIM FOR
1tONEY OR DAMAGES
0
TO THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA:
The undersigned hereby submits to the City Clerk of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga Lhe following written claim for
' money or damages;
1 Name of person injured or damaged: JUDY LOBENSOM11ER
2, Name of person whose property has been injured or damaged:
KARL and JUDY LOBENSOMMER
3 Address: 228 Abogado Street, Walnut, California 91789
s
+ 4 Name of person and poet office address to whom notice of
F action on this claim shall be sent: LA MONTE H ISOM, Attorney at
` Law, 2706 Artesia Boulevard, Redondo Beach, California 90278
' S If a person was injured or damaged, the date the injury
' or damage was sustained: July 5, 1978
q 6 If claim is for personal injury or property damage, complete
the following
a A general description of the damage or injury or loss
incurred:
0
(1) Total loss of one 1975 Mercury stationwagon,
California license number 8311tLP, estimated
value of said vehicle: $3,370 00
(2) Personal injury to left kidney sustained by
JUDY LOBENSOMMER, the driver of said vehicle
at the time and place designated in the enclosed
copy of the Police Report Please note that JUDY
1
±Y
LOBENSOVXER experienced sharp pain in the
kidney commencing July 5, 1978 to present.
She also sustained a severe sprain to the
right foot The exact damages sustained for
said personal injury is unascertained at this
time, however, demand is made by JUDY and KARL
LOBENSOMER for the amount of $20,000 00
b Name of doctor: Emergency doctor at San Dimas
Community Hospital, San Dimas, California.
c flow injury or damage occurred: Due to the negligently
maintained intersection at and -near Hellman Avenue and 7th Street in -
Rancho Cucamonga, California, and automobile being driven by MICHAEL
JOHN GERTH lost control thereb^ colliding with the 1975 Mercury
stationwagon being then driven by JUDY LOBENSOWIF.R, causing the here-
tofore set forth damages Please refer to the attached Police Report
marked Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference Please note
that the Police Report sets out that the reporting officer noted that
the water running In both the east and west gutters were filled with
green algae, which would indicate that this condition tins existed far
quite some time It is this condition which caused the automobile
driven by IIICHAEL JOHN GERTH to lose control and collide with the
automobile being driven then by JUDY LOBENSOMMER, causing the injuries
heretofore set forth
7 If basis of liability is alleged to be act or omission of
City officer or employee, complete the following: It is unknown to
the Claimant at this time whether any particular City officer or
employee was /is responsible for this neTlipcnt condition, however, it
is the Claimant's contention that the City of Rancho Cucamonga should
2 '
-
have taken steps to install appropriate gutters and /or drains on
Hellman Avenue at or near its intersection with 7th Street, which
could have precluded the collision guide reference to herein The
mere fact that the reporting officer noted that preen algae was
present would indicate that this condition has existed for quite some
time, thereby placing the City of Rancho Cuc -am,n , on notice of said
condition Thr fact that being placed upon notice of this condition
and /or taking no action to correct this situation, would make the
City liable for any and all foreseeable injuries a. /or damages arising
from such said negligence. It is further contended by the Claimant
that this condition is dangerous and /or a defective condition of public
owned property, and upon this basis has filed this Written Claim For
Damages and has made demand for the heretofore set forth amounts
All notices or other communications with regard to this claim
should be sent to the Claimant in care of her attorney at: LA MOHTE
H ISOM, ESq , 2706 Artesia Boulevard, Redondo Beach, Califorria
90278, telepho•,e: (213) 372 -8484
Dated: This _ iay of July, 1978
3
Attorney for Claimant
t
, I.,
•o�+Tr� ^"• I ii ,S.,n , u_rarl:ro . •• �•:,••." •3 I M- 437767 -11
... B4J1F1a•¢v r-1- ____ - -- -'- — -"-- -I ? t e 7..t.
:. 1.
d
4. •' aPl Jccn Gcrth _ I ,• •....
Fc*ilp_p ft,
°.•..
.: :1 :6y`_6:� =+ 116 160
1: :...i..: _ _life •'�,•?''�..=.1. —�: °:- ?.� vlt G�IlLr..l•sF,:.t:5:.. _
i ° _ir'il�,lDP't+,] :"'T_7f _ .,ri•j 1L? _.— �311i.I
1,CrAc
•55
..{{qq 1_rrira -n 4 Imo: � Fr=t Y..-,..1
ix znnA '101C. v
i SY °�a¢iL',
va L:•s'•a 1 P.v. .,.. r Cj
• a7i w I:ar��,�St +.icr.•� = t_�31_:I,^ �.:1L. +£:.rl Lr.•..�-` -� 4
a .. •Y) 1:•;n..L`.-._ -, c.. .:.:... — s: @ -:'_ "t.Aa:
T• ••44 «'ft -t•r.: U.-A= 76 .I In: ..
�d
�«: wcc aca :a: -- oi`nao..v.on� oyncov�a
. ".�.= :£ti's. =:a �-
Sl» Giry Strict APdlnrd =. Cal <_P.
..+ �-
1�_+_- -•-_.:
• ~'
', CJ�•,>„ l' �;£" �} F?-: Y;: i,` f~,; ;`.1�1J1_L.`t,� ? %; "��}:?:••�Y•: �� •r � ��r°J
. Tom'_ -- - _
.
1
n 1,
V, I I A
MW
. s
■i
�•Q :/s :.T: .it _-.�.`_...— : r rCr ll— liL ^�? 11� _.__! �. i- .Yl::,::�y'.
E' Szt1G�lL:trGL•tr nii ,t•�ii r.- tl�l.L.�i.L•t_ _(. /.•s_£.i`_7BES.= _.4i
- - -'— - — — _ _ _ _ •air
;1flG= t L/ �e'.64.4251�._La�dz•2sLdr1.A_r2 t:�:3 ,YP�. —Y'fa_ '�•'tL14q r
��: ♦ ,.vrL Ft l FN Jr nLY�11T1Qe[_Ll.9- 42f&- AAZIA,a // /L`
"�s.' �- Gam., -.�, n..F. �[LS./.sZ1 ✓s. _I r' _.T.tCfT.. f1't• �G'_�f ✓EG_ Ti• 6..
�c✓1L..7n....G!.�.T -. •• ��.rr_ .J lvoY _ .�af�r✓.. =Y-eeg' e7 --
�...rsc -!ea 66_•�_UCG[t..asrlaJ Gu r/ :t ,¢•scerfwY f.;G
— __ -lsa TGG_ <;.Lf T•,.2. c1dnC4 .;_= !f£! /.�� %i1 %•E_ /C CF_ GG >Ci Er=
��- GC.. % ?.Lu$i:C4 .✓:TA' di / /•L''. 3., :U r.• i /. >.Y !.:.K�S G✓ L`_ +.Y
s..'r ..u..... •V _ ap...pL . - , ♦ •. /G OI '.1..(.L 1 t ,- LµCIV[YLYi gMLC(OI..
N W..w.ra.YY. ♦. L. _. a.... •......• ..I.....NL � 1 Cl1LL14.OM
♦ nu. I L1 -q-�L
... _ -_
.....Y r. ,-F6N rte' �-1� -1�• «.• ••• 1 • 1 ♦c• ___
I♦. !Ww _ _ Mu ...
µ•.Y/ IL... • . -�I •• •.
...L.. +rL it -�-� t: ....: ... ,..L.• _ _4 _ _ _
�..us Y•,.O.I L:+.L 1_ Vb. I L{r._ ..a.•... IL�
RL•[ n.y H..y. w.. ,..M_.• . s:
l rw a, C♦.r.ras. �''f] � C�. YS:r. •.w♦w�Y I.Y.fY..J •uL
N. ...,1 ;, ♦+... w.� -1 Y. u... .••a.ua Ifq 1 'L ..• ....•
a..iiws+...«.a.«...- Iw ..... - - 1 I� ....:, w. ....... 1 i � -gyp ' - • _ •1=
r_
„I , rl _ filtf
�}`lrr�-�.Iler�r�uraara,;..u�•c ......... .,...., ..._.. �.- = : —• -- - —
'
r,�.irwmvc ceunnu.tnan nr•n•m ;. �;., -. ».. ••IZ.1 /t 3a .I. -'S!C. _ .�GC�P_ssIIJ17 ?5 Z1• /• 3`
ColLlil Olt Nt.ONT 1. ^r ..l r. u. nl
.WIYL[uTNTK T011rK [OlLg10N _ _ _
I'utNOT luo.0 a.0 ul / /J S^ 1 .—•-
�F0111t1r _/Y /Y /if •N SI�.f YJHr _i� /�..f __ �T/�•f�!%�___ _1r _ may_ �i.
�!' .e• /,. 4•n /; .. q,cn•n,.lCw cRC.� '�i1
n ,
C
,�L.= ;.L',vf llot!ES�'Y•f.SF6a4_1G4_ =L?. �. 5�_ /:L�.F�rcvwr:^��_ /irlte�in•:
d/F a,T:'GL� fbt'Q— DES *�Nfr- .CSf.Gt: P__ Th � .(ri�.T ��Fa'r _!y /!:�' /;•o� p< _
•�.:eE —i. !1G- <`fSJli F�'N._UF_T_: br _r/E61 LLL�_ fu/.7 /!._ /Ca NA /___C6N.'Aru._:
t�T- .�i ^7x.. %.vY ! =F.T •� la /i�FFT ir.CR_ <til /fic':. _ _
�:.r. '..in2:)7e_r :.:.: 'LE � �: / ♦7� �•/•.J u'Y:. °� // /L��C_sGf
1 _ _
..1'��•j r.rrTiLZ..7if •l�rlc'ilS.e G= Q�1YL[�i_��L'Gf r.�_it�'n"1SZ/1Q_.t�nG�.Y1'�
;FNrrsTlsrzca,• .e.m �,ce�ll.eAm. A�� •�«�„ct�L_z;_Ea.2,�3�°LR�r6aic
b?P�'•L'_��.t�_LGP_Z•i° S. t_ �C�.•: C�. tfd _Tie.�_.lE� ^LE.�aust�..?uS,,_
:L°EEaL•'�U.TNL(F.ft -2% 23 �� .lc�crll/ A/'/:'aA.• /4_ /.E�C .: -iif� .c.�rT...
a:LL' 4.4l.V . /��T /! :i .0 r:J: .eGO Y�..fSZ�G GBL.C/S .L.: /e ttG err. YXE - .,• +o
4':_Q i /nr T�•.°�...., :i - .:is�n•GV. i/�aa:.:. s4 /a /.� (� ✓ -/� F,�- ? +.cf'i�
:r
�
f •Y, ..
1
r �-
tt�ttv,.
fUPP LIZ L1CNTALIN:,ft RATIVL
fb
»•••••••,••, •1,..1 ... ,...,. ,,.r,.. .
s_•:�r�t�1a
...... �..
CMAwwATIVCCCwT /I /YA11011 TOA /IIG
_7 ... _��l5_. _ ����
rt• n...m <I
N��r6t.�! yl
GCLL61ub NLICNT 1... w <• m ul
F.:/.:.K rVi✓ ✓. •7
} NIILC4CLi AL i11AItIC GOLLIiICII
_
tIItO09T 4o wup. ul
�},oTNtw,
f./EEfarRN_e� /6._ !�Q _7. � .rSTiiSET _
• ,
• —� __ I 'a
. _ __' :!LY '?: I
.
gtinur. cnu.q.w�•-
c -
�n `' �" E6L EA�GGG6 .'EaZ..r,.A�OS_..G.�.:IIE �Gif't_R °.C•S 11F.� ✓:IJS�_ �E- :�. �!
�Xtd t!i2UlGr 1t/O,t T.'L -Q!' AgOX., X, ✓ i ti ' .C.V,2 fvTEXMIC- -r-d' R✓A•41!Ve
'itdr62.O,u_T.AE :..EtT_Cufi: /iJC !%lGalfi ?iVF :n! ,f/GGAe :.•n'•OT a�,es •�_
X91 •P.
'+VS • ,hr ,1 "`+,�'_. /t ,a, CIF t••..:t•i 1• -,
'� E,Q,tISacK6�; .lti -G+" r-v rfT_ ✓CC��ra pR (WL� ?.a_P�_,.
-.
rlQ�lPE�e+.c«Jl:,a�c4 ;,,;: .
oa..c <°Tp. �aCQ_Sr1tCERCE._�• 1,•.._ .__ I . ,y cyl
(t�1rdl�t /TS_ � ?:[.C:G:��.G_..1 ._(t_+.C�N -✓L-!, ___ _______._
°,7.� �E�CTL' �QY!Sf.LL_fLE .l JAS %�I�LIFiGLt1l�2C1LTlI /ir�.ii,t. - Q6i- l±.�LL!!.,Ct.1_
t2✓,e- er L/L^1T_l2L�dd'�Aud- .QG'GC. ^.dCO _S�lltCeCL•�.df�.4G64.N!Vi -.
,y��rAi'Fn Ta_LIS. -d:�r> =TS'� •r <i? Q< T.1�_/'ti�flLw- ,vzctLTig.t_...
�r fF^.:u. -n N�� /'.fi]!.d`A.,a G���..... �r,nni.,i•. ,�I �A... l�.aTGC_r�_LIX�CA! _
ruff• N�•..rl'llcr Tl�� .tu.. 1.</i- {�F...:'[CLL!.s.G- Sc Y.Lltv...r ln�GGtt!a�__
,STdd /7FF0 c.S n.. pct[ 4/ t. 1u:..' EbL LLE'Llc:`Q.�.�1.LL�J�Lu�SLti'�Q �.
a . ve_ /,:CQ
T�' _T. ;'SS,�L?CWWa+��p�p,'.' 7.• .�lEnt� /G,.I:•= %SG�'6cel;lt._: It_ «CIA. F. H/ ..cut_t S.F_
I`
61GQ1��11f." 40TI lE.2'g(✓dslC4C_x�.,.''�.�'.GP✓ /.ice
�AT:.'ttZ>@Y.
a�r�ei�TEQ_A7.:!'GIC�_
m ro T(!E_GtiTrf:
%tiL1 C66: .O,::f. s{=L3 :� ^Jlivr� <,L JR' GF- ..:Jr•C
F.:/.:.K rVi✓ ✓. •7
.tc
_
•dam
r�`�I =L L° /•t _.x..'9.1 .._.. .1
. _ __' :!LY '?: I
.
d�_ '
X91 •P.
I
,..
UIPLEMENTALINAnnATIV@ —.... 1 „_i I... ,..... IH.,,... ...,
�� Ib qL aK•I � s• - I 7. � I.O., -
Colus rry ll
c CONTINO.TIOb Tnrnc .,. +a ... . c. ....•
WLNnon nVOxT IL +•m••mnl i� �•
WrrLCMLNIAL fOdrlIC COLLISION I -,
NC.ONT 1..• m+. uuq
orNLN 4:;%;Gn•tN �/ _lJ�O._ :. lJ• �I -.PEFY -- •."r _ _�:i.,.
: �•/ XL4.` _".i- l'– (,1– .�= 6+__:ri�••°._Fi. lf..•t__ :.7ttTH- ./� ? ✓i✓P. O!l_/i''.�i; /.2A,L�_td /E. 1'^...
-�Qi t._dE__'YrSG [./N.'C..L• [f�2_F �-�:5._utft.C.t. _G.m' 7�_A it'P /.:f�C•:.t�
F� «I, -ap� iC.f) F_ ✓�FfE4• -_ i1.G d: CF_�1�.5 •L'G•tl R`.:�:•F /� .f''R /d•CLtrr .fL•L
.j1V /7,•Th'C LtlE^' [,'r✓1@1c' rt :c�� CCRr r /!'JEP. �•:'CG'/�'r .:�/",4 G•�J�vL
°� C6PSG�i3v_ 2�r ✓ES7LC.e— T d -•--- •..._..– -�.. –r .+,,.. –.� .,.,.;;,r
—p ---
ti!
- -
'''• �'• -
f, '�i9¢�3 {f:.!•y � •; ;1 ,• :- .�'T�cI =(c�� ,
-° . ,�a,'t': % • ti.•'�'�?y'•�'•.
.'��`:t- ,ry,�'r.
i�
•I r
ALL u[xsu,
. z -
� a
tit s a > r4y �Rrr �>IF5els F T'�
♦su ? 2 t1 , I t si'N. �y�Y
�t41;. '•i; r8 :t��, i,�`z+ t <�l�„f k
r4. t"/Lrfr�i��f;
t';. ,, , ,. talc 'r' : a I.r. • �,..
ski /d I�s��lf i °•�j �
^�la' S.i..;Y °1+�to W` Y'. '- der •��� "S ., f ixrtuY'r1it�SfK.��ay'4dt
CTUAI ...in.i..r— iJrs,N�AT IVVLCf7.1TIi:U 7r!
eLUL ArveUx�r. pl[eua r..., rn
1T:'I-1 Tnu'-7,.: f', —1 .—•L7a ,lrr•-- T1
i
f �
:.ti rill .SV�'.y a�'�i¢$ r }'. "r,:k�:••sir a. <, f •' �.,�;r
�k0• a:� sC.��: �• T f t .r fit: .�)�,) °i'��• °����� y
h li.. /Z �.MN•I� � b •.
1/ �1
aniL I Q
•2
iGlc P.A$T,C N
L
, F •r ,c i t ^
� 4 t
r , r
a -
�1
y:rcr aria, -.tl
x1Y�"
,
. ??I n
yr
r ..
u< 2
mo
0"
m
� O
U
F
W
U
O�
n
F o\i
M \
U W
O
o •
Coco
0000
[Z QIOOn
a NO�
O �O W Nfti
U}
U
u
M
O
d
G
H
d
mq-C=
L 1J
NOM H
HNCC
al't00
OQ
C d d
$ U H N
r
F Cm N N
U 0 zoo
m .J mam
o F3mm
O v O Qr O n O
O N h h O N O
n 1+f n r'1 N N O
H1 ^ N O r In
N
b
0 q
d d
u F
H H
1
m y
n u u a
N d n
\ N
n q \
N y M �
d N U W
F C W o\i n
q h J O O q
F V
AO G O
d d W P N N
U L M a q
N w
V Cw 0 d N u u
o n X M 0 4u ..q
Kn m0. h W O 4 7
U ti
vWmW
d
W
m
e+1
J
.Y v1
f'1N N N
N
M
N
N
N
N N
1 1 1 1
I
Y n
n
n
n
n
m
W
W
m
m
m
m
m
W
W
a
U
U 1 1 1 1
1
1
1
1
I
1 1
Coco
0000
[Z QIOOn
a NO�
O �O W Nfti
U}
U
u
M
O
d
G
H
d
mq-C=
L 1J
NOM H
HNCC
al't00
OQ
C d d
$ U H N
r
F Cm N N
U 0 zoo
m .J mam
o F3mm
O v O Qr O n O
O N h h O N O
n 1+f n r'1 N N O
H1 ^ N O r In
N
b
0 q
d d
u F
H H
1
m y
n u u a
N d n
\ N
n q \
N y M �
d N U W
F C W o\i n
q h J O O q
F V
AO G O
d d W P N N
U L M a q
N w
V Cw 0 d N u u
o n X M 0 4u ..q
Kn m0. h W O 4 7
U ti
vWmW
d
W
m
e+1
J
.Y v1
f'1N N N
N
M
N
N
N
N N
1 1 1 1
I
I
r
1
I
1 1
nn00
n
O
Q.
N
n
N N
�
U 1 1 1 1
1
1
1
1
I
1 1
< 0000
O
G
O
O
O
O O
O
U
c
d
8
a
0
d
a>I
a
w
d
L
M
ai a
µz7 �
n N O N O O O O
O n N In O O m O
O f"1 H H
H
M
P
O
A
b
H
O
b \
n m
Q. 1
N h
Iw n
C~ U u u v u
O O T O
W H q q q
a H 4 Y u u u w
op .NJ o m c m
H 15 CqJ T T T
O m 0O3 vii 7 7 � �
.E L, H i. ti ti F ti
Vl .i Vi Vi Vi Vi W W
v1 N h N N N N N
1 1 1 1 1 r I r
Q� O Or p O O fJ O
N vi .J N h N H In
1 I I I 1 1 1 1
O O O O O O O O
G
�
d
5
w
w
W
u
P
U
m
U
m
G
F
n
v
r
q
d�
Pi
O
M
CJ
F
G
O
O
,G
6
X
.0
Z
W
W
O
w
y
0 u
F
z
z
.4
0
to
M
0.'
_
rOp
�!
c
gO
g
.I
G
A
A
m
ej
C
w
T
9
T
L
N
'o
H
+ql
b
•7
N
t
,�
F
N
>
M
N
w
d 0
C
q
N
H
O
m u
m
m
U
0
0
U
w
x
W
U
0
T
'—
.4
H 7
0
Z
x m m a m o•. m
V
n a0 D, O ,•�
pi
O O
.-1 n
�o to
H N
n
•1
M
h
h
O
h O N 100
r-I
N
O
O
T
O I
q
N
IO
M
.t
O
0100 O.�O CI
O0
O
O
O
N
O O OIFMpp`l�
P
ylN
Ot
�D
n
h
h
O
O�VC1N0
n
n
C'1
h
V
Onn
O
a
C1
Cl
N
b
.1
h
�D N n
00
n
O
�O CI O�
h
�
N
�
N CI N
rl
M
t•1 v,..l
b
C1
~
th
t?
A
H
M
.Y
'O
Nf N n C1
Q
N
G
,- 1, -I,-1 ,••1
n
v
u
\nnnn'
q
d
to
�OMNHH
\
F
M d
n
11
H
4
M
vv\1N�v\l
OD
V
N
U
N
H
U
H
n C
C
�O
10
r
q
q
C
'O
\
M
C
O
q 7
M
n
ri
,•Oi
o d d b
'O
.CC
,-Oi
n O d
fNJ
d
14
C C C C
H
m
.-I
m C
q
y
M
H
q
A
C
0
MM H MM
q
d
'o
q
uM
p
\
\
A
q
M
7M d.+M
T
M
C
•• C.+
o
H
O
n
U
L
F
O
I d p d d
d
q
O
u 0 d
N
F
d
d
d
p0
u
G
u
d N M m m
G C g q
C
H
0
4
u
C m
Nf
p,
00
00
t+
C
6
7
q
7
.I q [. q q
0.
]
d
00
]
q
d q
PG
D•
H
Cd
d
u
N
.'a
u.
u
pq.q
u
•Mq
T
O h.-I O
.-I
T
T L, o
u
ph
M
i'
M
T.
O
O
W
W
7
^�
gCIh.1 Cl
N
N
O
7
] >>Ct
d
W
S
gq�n�o•
n
G
W
h
tiOrn
a:
x
1
1
1
I
I
1
I 1
1
1
I
1
1 1
1
O
U
U
I
I
1
I
1
1
1 1
I
1
I
1
1 1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
0
C
C
u
ti
d
COJ
G
0.
.0
1+
O
U
W
L
{�
Hd
H01
C3
IM
O
N
O
O
m
M
d
>
>
C
C
O
V
G
O
V
m
u
m
fA
Od
Q
,1C
N
m
4
m
q
(.
q
,.7
W
m
d
d
O
b
q
H
H
3
H
N
N
a
W
U
q
q
C
u
u
� K
q
�
MCO
~U
N
.R.q i 7
1•7
C
T
m
(
W
K
�p•]4 l
A
A
O
u
Cd
L
N p
J
:L d J
S O
5 O
O
u
q
0
O
q
U
U
U
f
:
r.
F
rl
4
6
6
ml
.'
M1
M`.
0
Z
h
tJ
U
w
w
O
O
O
N
m
coo
O
1/1
O
O
O
O
ON
O
N
O
O
O
000
N
O
O
O
O
O
000
O
cc
o
w
a
o
o
w
c
O
I Mlo
bmm
w
O
m
m
o
o
v
o
v.o
0
O
e-1
m
r-1
Vl
r-1
moo
m
N
r1
~ �
N
H
a
a
w
F
o
O
O
M
H
w
L
H
u
U
a
0
m
-
0.
O
H
u
u
O�
O
N
H
c
Ww
u
n
1.
uC
w
ur
+ul \
a
O
J
rO 1
G
w
In �
w
N
O
O
G
0
O
o
c
o
o
F
d a
o
o
O
O
•
F
w
u H
F
F
F
ow
V
u
H
a
c 00
U
V
O
u
N
V
O �
F
U
w
w
d
U
W W
U
w
w
7
N
H
w
2
X N
u
U
c
T
W
a
rr
W
c
d
u
T
ci
T
H
T
Wi
T
O
w \
W
a
.
O
w
.0
-1
.0
i
N
a
A.
P
c
w
O
P.
c
1
O
0W6
+
Fd
a
v
H
O w
J
.0 00
a
1
1
O
O
W
F
1
N
e
Y
.0
V
w
0..
p w
a
b
b
M
v
K
w
O
c
c
w
w
c
a
d
c
c
N
c
w.J
c
W
N
V c
OJ
00
W
W
w
w H
c
W
W
c
W
O 0.
W
d
cw
C
q
W
6
A
C
C
4
¢
rJ
1
1
1
m
l`l
m mm
1
VI
1
1
1
1
1 1
1
N
.O
N
N
N
N
N
N N14
�I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1 1
1
m
m
Y
Y
Y
C
O
N N O
p
N
r•I
o
ww
w
F
�w1
N
N
0
Vl Y1 V1
�70
1
.J
o
w
�
w
F
w
w
w w
w
w
Q
!:
F
o
A vv
H
G
G
F
M
M
M
W
c
14
H
Hec
u
CHu
H V
NO
W
W
.ai
d
Fal
W
mac
to
a
.V/
$4
+�+
n
c
c 0
c 4
m
u
$4
a
u
O
W
W
w u
a
w
Z
T
01
u
w
U
w
w w
N w
.J
O
C
10
V
r7
�Bw
7
u
a
w H
N
G
c
a
m
W
M
m
d
O
O T
O P
u
lq y.
pO
0
c
a
T
Ta
Tw
Y
.qH
3
u
.p
W
G
C
C
C
C a
d
u
W
C
U
F
y
1 W
X
c
d
P
.Wi
H
w
c
7
7 7
7 H
H
0
"
u
.+
N
a
.-Ti
.-1
c
W
N
W
H
W
O
O w
O F
O
d
H
W
M
F
W
a
m
to
5
9t
0
U
U
U
0
U
m
U
m
w
w
.11
0
0
z
U -.T vOj b
V
n
O O
.1 u
m u
u
0
O M
P. A
< U
u
r
0
W'
U
T
0 N
o a
W a
u
iTi
O
V1
O
O
D`
O
O�
OD
.-101
O
N
O
O
N
O
ID
OI
o
u7
L
al
u
rn
y
S
6
w
X
%
VY
U
V}
W
d
G
d
f/�
A
^Hl
O
�
"
HN
D
o
'On
O
6
°i
=
m-o
=
o
0
w
Q
z
0
.00a
F
w
a�
A d
a
s
'0
F
nl
U
cd
U
W
Q 0
W
F
0
t
N
C
0W
w
F
A
10
�O
1
�
1
1
1
1
u
o
u
V
N
a
�
n
O O
.1 u
m u
u
0
O M
P. A
< U
u
r
0
W'
U
T
0 N
o a
W a
u
iTi
C
.-101
u
u
o
u7
L
al
u
rn
y
S
6
w
X
n
O O
.1 u
m u
u
0
O M
P. A
< U
u
r
0
W'
U
T
0 N
o a
W a
u
iTi
RESOLUTION NO. 78 -42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NUMBER 4499
(TENTATIVE PARCEL tb%P NO. 4499), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Hap Number 4499, submitted by G.S R.,
a Joint Venture Partnership Subdivider, and consisting of three (3)
parcels, located on the south side of Ninth Street at Helms Avenue being
a division of a portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter
of Section 10 being a portion Lot 10 Nap of Crcamonga lands was approved
by the Planning Commission of San Bernardino County on Hay 4, 1978 as
provided in the State Subdivision Hnp Act and Is in compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance 28 of sold City; and,
WHEREAS, Parcel Nap Number 4499 Is the Final Nap of the division
Of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and,
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of said Final Hap, said Subdivider has offered the Improvement
Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City,
together with good and sufficient Improvement security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets
delineated thereon:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved
and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of
said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto;
and,
2. Thut the offers for dedication and the Final Hap delineating
same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute_
the certificate thereon behalf of said City
3 That said Parcel Hap Number 4499 be and the same is hereby
approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same
to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1978
Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ATTEST:
City Clerk
I
CliY OF RA.4CIIU CUCAIIONGA
5 0 :.R M01 I
DATE: JULY 28, 1978
TO: LAUREN WASSEUTAN, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LLOYD MIIBBS, CITY ENGINEER
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAAP NUMBER 449)
Attached is a copy of maps showing the location and lot configuration of
said map, along with the bonds, agreement and resolution accepting the
offer of dedication, approving the Final lap, and giving nuthoriwation
to the Mayor to accept the agreement and bonds for the improvements of the
streets shown on said Final Map. Please note the letter from Associated
Engineers indicating they have been paid for and have installed the
required monuments Therefore, we have :et required a Monumcntation Fee
/��Rcc/3yc�ctfully su Ittcd,
LL IIUBB
City Engineer
Ul:dm
Hy
'�M )NGA
94 VI,.
ol......
0 r) Foot t'
IRA:) III
.............
Nil
m 3 9th St
R."T.
Ll:
-.nx. -.'c 11
DO
Tf 14
15
inni
1pll,1.41
—4g. !L-r.
... W•a
TARIO tt 810
n 21 Le
2i
War
ISI j�ll IN lk I e . . , . 1�
J( MI.,
si =ice
P7= C_
uz
T /.4 .P7fY
� t
lI k `
1 •CGiNc�• � I
.• �QIn I ♦,� o C 4 t 1 ��Q.
tr oiap. eod .f 1 I X �t i!3 %f%ddyLl
I k' Oiiili t
lorry J. Rogers I 1 4 1 1 ��
tole M. 8ogecr � � .� � _ .
tied Gildner I t�
Darlene D. Gildnlr ( `gip• O j I 4
000r9e E. Shanks 1 F Jy
Marjorie E. Shatz( 1 ql` `�dc• ;• �u
t Oid�e�dn
-
�
f 1
le
I` I
I
O
ZJJ.� f
APPLICA.YI;
Naas G. S. R Develo mcnt
Address 26 W !'hone 17191 6� Y� 7 -z=
` St to St
Ontario Calif
LEGAL OWNER OF RECORD:
[Jame "See Above
Address 5265 N. Fh°°< T 916
S ate St-
C,.tarfo,
�• 91761
.MAP PREPARE) BY.
teems Assoc! —te eers 98 -
Address 316 East �. P6m+s 986 -5� BI��
East .E.. Ontario Ca, 91769
IDiAL N0, NISIASSESSORS PARCEL N0, 209 -03t -5
OURCE SECIIJR;,7C1/NSHIP .L`tp RANCESectton 10, TIS,72t7- $ii=
HETHCO O VAMR SUPPLY Cucamon a Count W t
F SE7AGE DISPDCat Cs��.....___ _ a •r 9Jatt.
Incerrtfy that 1 as the !check ona)M legal owner,
hls authorized agent and char the lntotvacton
shown hereon is tzue and eorrmc co the 6asc of ety
= tknouledge,
i vnl`a. )6ez"l, --
Dt�M
df
ciao
SO4
r
•
"1
1.
f
I
Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS
310 EAST 1 STREET • ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91786 • 17141906-5018
July 27, 1978
Engineering Department
%.lty of Raucho Cucamonga
11 O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730
Subject: Final Monuments - Parcel Map No. 4499
Gentlemen:
Thlc i< In -"If,- that Al .wuuments and markers have been set throughout Parcel
Map No 4499.
This is to also certify that I have received payment for setting said final monuments
and Llarkers and wid not hold the City of Rancho Cucamonga responsible for any payment
for retnng said monuments and markers.
Very truly yours,
ASSOCIIAII ED ENGINEERS
L.11. Noreen
L. S. 3002
LIIN /mc
ee: G.S.R. Builders
78-5
S.
FUI1111 /Jfi nF4Grllllr •••• I o
CITY OF RANCIIO COCM nliCA
IIIPROVEHLNT ACRLLIILNT
KNOW ALL I,. 111' tIU'CE I9lCgnns: 111.11 this .q•, rrm,•ul in made and rutrl•rJ
Into. Lt rrnfnrnnn, ,: pith file prowls Iron of Ihr Iln'sIrip,tl 1'{.
rf Ihr fter of a icit Im 10"•nl:a, SInL,• of f_tlllnr nl a. , mnnis'lpa1idrorporn[lone
��relnaflcr rrfrn cd to nx the City, by and hrlwrrn ward city nail
ItcrcWarier referredE l� nn_ pARTfiERgllIp
Lhc Dove
UITNESSETII:
MAT, NIII:RCAS, put nn mt to x.rld Code, Orvrinprr has rrgnrr.trA approval I,
rllt nl, Rancho CclCamnnga
`tlif the pro, I, Irnv - - -_ Y 1Iµ•
nil. Anil alt nm{•od rf Ihr Irport of the Cmmunl[y Development Dlrec[oertilere-
Y "t'nlx thereto; locates
11111t1'AS. the City I,.tv r.q nl.l lshrd rerlain u•gnl r{•m.'nI•, In he m
vrloper priur to gr.tnting the final approval of Y acid alld,
rt h
the parcel mop; vW
NIILia'AS• Ihr t•xrnni,gt rf thin :pa crmntl and I•n•a foil of ln4,rnvrtn•
ae hrrrh•Ifter rlt,•d u,•1 approved I.v the 1'Irt All,•
r•pllvn 1. nl of security
In prior ranple[lon o[ Until rr ulrementsrr(or' limo u[t•IM•i1 ttt hr
said approval: 9 p pose of securing
I:nit, 714 Cl FOC.k, it is hrl chy -'Creed-by mcJ he luecn the City and the Developer
ns fnlinvs:
I. Ihr sulallvidrl In•Irl'v agrrrx to rnll'•I,nCI a ' ;ubJiv i,lcl'a rxprnno nil
impl{`ter•nof. drxcrll•eJ on page 3'corral within twelve months from the
dale hereof.
1 11,C lt•rn rl
11••• • dnn• ( rl;l m l ,t.hins m . Ihrr ryIrae [ sit-lit be Twelve ills, of he„-of hY the City. 1Lsl
t1Immrncing an tile Antr
a:rrv.v nl rhlll Iv in drt.u41 on
hex Iµrn rxtrndt'd as hcrcl t nai1[Lrr pn,'tt• of Ile• v Ir,m ctli,u la tea, unless said term
idrd.
flu Purrl thin r w ,r4nrx[ l']-lit tuna' Ilme In which In romp lrtr List- prnvl-
Slonn of Ihh: .q'r rcm.'nlI In wrllilq: not Irss list's h�,o work prior In the
�fnr't,,d•litlsamltl1l;a.uc hul h,g .t •,l of rms•nt ut r Iln;m q.mrrs of riorsn, t
Ilu• Iighl Is• n•t•i "w lhlitpl rvl''1 r,t<LhI rof,aroIf r, gnrsl. file Cis
arch, rnsl , Ins lu,line r,. Y rrnrtvcs
•%Iln tl r. .nnl rµ,fl it lr;n I. of the Ile nn nnl n,rt foil al•tnJ-
rrgnlro mlJ anlnrnis thereto when warranted by suhslnntlnl Changes therein.
IV, nu,l to
If flu• prvr L'1•rr I Iii, or nrglrr In In runq•ly v1 UI Ihr prnvlw loon u
al;t, rm,•nl. lh, I lit .hall h.tvr Ihr rI r It m I'm• to oleo.{ I Ihix
Ir I•r ,nap 1. Ira bt ant' I Iw(Ill mr.tnn, .uulyl hrl rniw; Cl osl rrrvrrplsrnm
void . leper lit his Rutoty the full cost nud expense lncurreJ fr so
Juln�.
S Il rrCllt'ml to i. rinl; alt hntl I'tnl'I't� foul Lv Ihr prvrlolrr from the nrflrr, of
W.1%. .uui Ihr .1, yr ln'v t env an,l
I 1 •.hall {•un'inrl r.w It wutkl h,i'f Hilife
r1ml•Ilnur'. will, the
lrnul it Iona I "' "I la.
Ihr work ILm -t•, •• +pl l nru• M,.
rk ht' Ihr 1'lly, and naxrsNnNUI o[ flu• prnl'll, r. dl In •,lopp Atg of
b. Cul•I it as provided.
frvmul; rl vl111, i 1i pr. inpmvpmr• ill curl ,rqul,, ,l •.I; ;11 Ur tnnalroct,,I In con-
;fill ::1 unlud I4 rvinrl r'uul lJnv ,r.'vr'mt•nt plan ':I nail nd Sperlf feel lnnx. nod
Jralua1;oanv rna '"101' other 11 i'ry „I 11,. ,. I•,• I'nn•ttl nrl Inn •,hall
I or Pill-tic safety I I'll work deemed noeossary for
INPROVI:NI,NT ACRCLIIINT
7, Wntk d ...... vItl,in , ,let lnl: *Ileei.t .6111 1•,• ,IIIIgu1111 Purnnal lu euAple-
tlnn: of ...il. .h.tll Inyl' lhr Ill:hl lu wmp l,•lr any .It'll ,111 wnrk to tllc
rvrnl of nnprett ic•I dr Lly In romV let ion, ,md to Ir,nver all coat and
really. tnntrn•J IrAA the Ucvaloper mIJ /ur his nnttrnctor by any lawful
Al••lllx.
8• Thu 14•vr lwprr •1"'1 br rt•slv,natlrly r,q lrplau•w•nl, Iclocallau, or rn-
anval of ,In1• trmpnnvnl aC any Ire ll;al ion Nll cr w41oq lu ron(Itro wtl-
tLc I, goll,•J w,ut I„ tLc aat l afar[tall of ll,n City I:ngtncer and tile owner
n[ it w,Itor Pystt•A.
7 Ihr 1>.•vr lnprr •.Intl hr Ir <p,•nµ lblr for I,•aw•e 11 of all luomr rnrk and Miler
drhlI & Ilnq Ihr pnl•Ilr rll,ln ul way lvw4ttnl; fnln work June on tim ait
cent property or within said rlp6l of way
IU Ihr lu•er lnP•'t hall pl.111 ,lad lea Lnlaln parkway ln•t•P na directed by the
l]Iwaunlly Nrvrl nPmrnl till ecto[
II. T6r IAln nvcn,•ut or nn it to hr
n•nplrt hnl of Ili,• Irl nyyor fnutLdn•'1 by lhr p,wvlrl'rr to unranl rc
Of ILe t•ily All.. IhIP nlU Orw•nl ,hall br Pnhlrtt Io the approval
un•1 7hr print Ipal ammnll ,•f satd Improvement security
Pltall he ant Il'Pa plan the amount shown below;
IIIPROVLN1.11T SECUal TI SUIIHIT °fED: FOtthfel Perfomince Mond
TY 1'E
SURETY/ACENT pBINCIPAL AMOUNT
Material and Labor Ilnnd
Ili UI1771 ti$ ll"In1, Ihr part Ira IIerCLo have rnuµrd tiu•nr prcurnts to ba duly
t' rt fOrL .111-1 144Cv t,•,II;r 1pla nil fora,allties required by law on the dates
xcl forth upposl lc [bete µ11;na Ulros:
DEVELOPER
BY: CSR, a JOINT VEN_TURR PARTNERSHIP
���p����/J — - - - -�— DATr% 7 -27 -78
UY: WITNESS: UU _
_ Dnle:
'7-;27-7P
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFUIUIIA
BY:
ATTEST:
a municipal corporation
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
VA1 E:
5
"01411 1 S I(IAII
191 COAI Utll Ilr rivitr Iry S(11111111.1:
(Attach In ^Impectol'" Ggty ")
DATE: July 2S, 1978 PI.lU11T N0.
—" .—, CulU'UTED BY John L. Martin
File Rrlerence Parcel Wp 4400 City Drawing Nu.s
NOTE: Imes not include current feo for writing permlL or pavement replace -
OcIlt tlCllnyits
1I11NSTIl1ICT10.4 CUNT L!g 11L\rl:
♦R — ll.lter
=- - - - -- __— __ INSPECTION FI rS
UNIT IT UAd r1T" UNI
- CAL`ISTNiICT ION IIPtI•I1T 1141 - - - - - 4--- -•- T'COST
S AIIUUtIT
--- :< ur (nntt1lml lull (:()St rtlr�ltc AF tWAIN ClNNi'( -1 lnti _ L.S__
803 33
VA
-PI PlAt it �'.1l'k L�:II 61 rl At all Nr _ —•_, I I ----
%r0lA - NArKRl Al. IN
CA_. _
101AL INSI•Lt1Tt(ltl FITS (Minimum $10 00)
803 33
$
11 COMPACTION 1CSr FF.F „S
111 DLSICN FEI.S (102 of Tntnl Construction
Gtr( ErUmel r) ,$
4,014 63
ramirul Ibrfnl maucr Ilnnd $ JG,4B(1 ; 1 TOTAL $
N-llrrial and I.nhor Bond $ 23,243.11
Nalnu•nan.n 0un,1 $ 0
Car” Ilnnttmcol roll Depnslt . $ S,ONU 011
a' . 1 .1,..0 .... .. LL.�
"la" AIJ, "I'll lly 111f-M: PRISI.N7ru that uc,
—CSB, •-Join t_ �c * *.na_pertoarehio
as principal, anJ th, — .UNarn wACT7T
--- S- It154RAy� COC@ANY , uhoFO place of buain,
is Sos A olds
aB i California Colifocala n rnrpnrntlun :q•nnizcd and dolac bust.
multi nst by Vitt"... ..I the I -lug of lh. Slat, of
I`v tilt- Sl nla• of (.11m.tnll fnr Lilo p.11e Idaehltlgten , and duly llrcn•
r•url'l) nprn bonds nr undr rlal lu• ' we u( mti log, fum.tnl rt•lnp u[ bccnminp, Fol.
lLtl llm min, al' Smell me
1,01.1 a...I f1llmlly bounJttnrtor lbebCl tileo laws or state
Gtll(o nlia. io the ,1118L .,,,it full sum or
Foci:; SIX Thousand) Plxlr ]IUCdred_Ef�}1gp Sill And R1L3o0_ ilol lops
Inv ul vnnn•y of Ilu• Ih•Ilr.l }l
'It's of Aww, lr.I, f,t llu• .nv 1S 461466.21
lI. 1'l' mnJ.'. ur h,lrba 1•Unl um rrly• 1 m.•n[ nr uh ]till well and t
rm a.•a•.otr end .wri,:n +, aP, .u.d va.•h ut nor bottw, l'x,rlltn, w. aJminlet[a
IIII II,Vlll flbll 01' 1111\ 111.•fnl lv ,lnd wvvvr,,Lly, Iftmly by tile, Presents.
IAl11tI.AS, Like Prittcipa 1111 ]CAI ION IS TINt:
(I) it.ls rt'"'tted a Final 11,11, fnr Tract No,
f2) has submitted it Final Ilap fnr Parrot HAP No. 4499
hI e.rin J.uuc with Cllr of 1:aaehn Vllcam.,,14 "t"11- Inca•w and r,llnlatioli and xub,tecl
le n.mplrt lun of u•tl Ill' wlnk and improvrme.,is, all l'•1 Net to In tltn Copy of
rrnl Leta IIIYrL„ all lJn•d: .uW,
6111.It1:AS, the rrhtril. Inc exec11tcd h , an r mgt"'"t hl']v'l b n ropy ill uhleh agrecm. brle"llto atl.ule•d rnr III,. purl,,,o
Ideal If 1,.,t lam only, uhrreby llm Priarlp.,
pu,nl ctx Ih.• t'Itc r( :.nn lm Cllvamanl:t NI poi ham the unik anJ nikr the Imps uvrmeu
the rein meat lnncd oil tin lbr time and In the manner prnvldrd by said agreement.
11011, 'rlll;fl rOkl, if it,, rrin,•ipal wWll p, nt cell unit and rnmpl ele Lill said work mI
Ir•pt m•rmontr 1,I ,Icon doll. a• .Ilh tIIC I,rl•V IA LIgI4 ur Fa IJ ngr,e,,Ol Intl nil nwor]Cab
rn Jlnam lw of Ill'• lily of ILnml.n Cnrnnnur•I rl rlllallug the Logo net•Sr•nt wl Inntt, 1.
ihlr nblig,tt inn shall he null nod void, oLllcrutsc It shall rcrn,lln !n full [o[CC .,
cllcct.
I
Iin• Sot ell pI,t•in anJ I.rl rot retgrsFiv ruuwt ul� to dill t•clrnsion ttr exlen4lnns al
I It% In rpm. It., Lill' work .nIJ Imprlrvemruln al' mty In1 I;rantej to the Pclllaipal by
l'ila of I:mu hl' Fm .mnn,'•t dad hrrt'bv
I rapn•wrly walr.'w nut lc, of lbr prmKlelg of w,1
r`Il. nylon rl ,• <t. u'•Lm'• .md hM1t rl•a' exprl•a•:Iv ln nrVtlts lu Lill' w.tivcr or the dcfct.
ul het nla. .4 lhnilaLl"a, ]allies and estoppel In
Still's are till event sn1J extension or exl
I, grNricd
1hr' Snreta uul Pt tilt il•el hlrlhl•r al;rt•r lh.Il In the ra'rut tilt- unrk And imprnvcma'nt
ell• nut u'nu•Irl rvl
Htll u. ,I, a 1.,. t Ir`
1
1 u,N I1 ul QP.3 ZSf11rnR0iwe1
fl
Snul.nr lxL6. x. xrl l.x .n11.xL.n ..xl lLb ,xl•.x...lh
I.I... ... II. N. ...I.
,l h•'na �+j E029EP S%14 UI(,r
/
i 1.•_ A - PATt/•ca•
L.
1 Ilx ,...I.x ,, ,.l n. ,bll.x,•1..,.
i
u..lanrn.;ex x.o........1....,�..a ir
..d. r1,..., 1, dx, ay. x= /4. Hob.•• r !1•eSlr.�.11'h•1i19,1l7•rbrus
{
xl,.rl i rianari �
1l'IINI Jr un 1..,.1 .xl IL...1 ..1
t•
I IAOI I UCLIC
$ l`, f.'I
I J 1..1.1La••,IdU P011tlly
11y41111 „ ^_ �'.. •'•'•�
1'...1.11 r•01 (,I II.•3 II,N ,a, I!,nn
,1/
r.-t•1)
IIII I /IIIIIIIIII............1//fr I1II%
Y11 -.I
x.x• 11, 0•.I w 1'.0 L.0
tIW uu W MyM w9
p
YIICKLAN, the Clly ('aunt ll of the City of Itancho Cncnmongn, Stntc of Calif.
r�l,f l't' 'lo•I CSR A Joint Venture
�1 "Inc 11,,11 ") ha.,• ugt,,•,I Into YartncrahlP -. lilri rinefl er dcAl Rnated ns
end n•m, nn l:,cc Imp vb,vel•v prim ipal agrees W inatnil
Mete cerlalu dvAll:natcd ry•ollc el."t vemanls, uttich said agreement, dated
1978 , and idenllfied aN Project Parcel Slap 4497
IN hereby referred to and mule n par[ hereof( and
1:111 RI,AC, under Ihr Iri my of acid nl: r,•,•mut, Iw'inclp•tI Iv rrgnlrcd, before
rnlel rhg: upon the P, iinrr,.un'i of lh;- un,k. .a fill, a I:nu,I and Aufflelmlt fre Payment
I•und vt th lho l I 11 of Ann la, ('r,
{•l 'n,ul, In 'flllr 1• p I• will' 3081)linfL Part a4toEuDlvlslno ]cote the
omit••;• fn; ullh $
Civil lido of lilt. Sta1; ul California
IInN. IIII RI I'Ui;f . •:aid pr lac 1pal and the und„r.igu•'tl nn enrpor.tle eurety. nre
hu•1!I f hml, IvIn,•I ,g ,• Ibr vity of Rea, lu+ ('uremonl:o .old all tact rnc[nrN. Nuhcon-
Ilar.1101 Lllhll l'I F• "r ll el Lllmr,l till miler IvIruu'• rvplorrll to the nr[ftir.,,vtec n(
III, .il nl csa iJ .p;l rrmvtil and referred to In the of ni r•rh•ulimlcd CC d of C(vll pro-
- rrderc u, the sum of IVENTY 111REE TUOUSA,ND 1140 1111' * FORTY TIPREFE
(c
23.'143.!l - t - ._...) for m,tvt lnl' furnlFln•,I IF DoUars 4 li /11
kind, n1 fur a"'knill, d,h• uudrr the Unrmpinymt.nl 111'•Urallt't•1 A111[rullllr[ell of to
the unrk nI lobar. That •:aid sucety will Pap the same In nn nmannt not exeeodlag
Ilir nr•n,tult In•,e11111 t. •:rl fnrtlt, and .jig,, In rout ,.ail 1, hl nup;ht upon lh1A bond
it, pay, lu addilhn, In Ill,- fate om,•unf ibe,,uf. uvula .hall reaRUn,d,lc txPvI.C,eN a
rt" IIt' ur lr,L.rv,,,hlr nttalnvy's C••rv. Ic, nctrJ I•y City In fi11rCCfiAfULly ce-
fPCt ins tenth be t4;.tt I,.n. Ia I•r au.n'dt.d .old fl.v,l by 11c court, old to ba Coxed as
1'nAtF and to be includl'd (n the Judgement thervill rendered.
It 1•, Io cl•ll cyII rvvl)• atlpuletml anJ .11tr that lhiA hood shell leurc to
the Imu%led of ale .nil all prnnns. ,rrmp•n,Iry mill rorl•oretlu „- vntilled lc Clio
bin •tlm•: undcl title 1; pnnpnenr lint with Section 711:1 /) if Part 4 of Olvi,lim, J or
lln• t'Iv(1 1'ndn, .,. I.. I :ive n right of notion to then nr Chair assigns in coy cull
ught upnli lhlu l•rud
effecthecul.rtnulll , andl voul,fOtherwise l lac shuckvbcalrodr remiin It” Cull force Jandt
effect.
The •.ul ell' h•rrl•„ +tlpnlnfog and net rrs lilac n,• change. r <tenalan of Clme,
nit.•I'nlian er nddit Inn Ill III,- firma of void oat cr,al•u1 nr the enrelfl^nt loop aced,.
p.mtinl: the shin• Fh 111 In .Inv m,nun`l affect !ts nblll :et Loll•: nn this hood. and It
does hereby waive nu Lice oC ally such change, extension, alteration or addition.
III Itt T::I NS LTILI:I nI'. this Instrument I,•v been duly executed I'Y !' rr torin.n
.and Ailrety nhnvc named nit
rh,f - -.e- ..m)y.27tht , 1972—, at
.Cal !font l a,
CSR A Joint Venture partnership
i'rinciyal
Srm..1 C.Ilra..i. 1
[.Wort of Son Bernardino 1)/
On _ 703[ 27. IYLB , lJ.r. rh. undmipn.d, . Nl lmp P.6ll, m end I., ..'a Cp..I........41,
n.41. AaeWell r tnp.m rp m, re k. ,b pawn
wh.0 man. I, .usacn E.d r. ,h..ohm invu. .. An.rn.eim Fec, .l UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, pad
.chro.6dp.d ip m. ,h.i�h. m6m16.0 rl. na...1 UNITED PACIFIC INSh RANGE COMPANY... s,n.ly, enL nJ.!
brp.nry•I, Fecr,
'nn.el 'CAI �1
i r•. ., r t , r
1
1 .n iannr %/
Sub et Walhlnpen, tlml he
r1pY ma4.rmm, tuu end gmi m POWER OF ATTOKNOW ALL MEN fly THESE PRESENTS TNUM UNITED NCC OHIPANV r mr
Por,bo duly w1-Nt1d mqx tM fly, of IN
C. H. ROCXNELL, JR. of ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA -. -- ------------------
Hnrw eM NYAUTAnwnryaMtn.le �b aaea•r,Inl trq ddwrTer awJOn IU MNI1, rrdatluu gdwd
ANY AND ALL BONDS AND UNUERTAKINCS OR SURETYSHIP ------------
"to Curd the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY thereby at fully Intl to Ore Ynw ealret of d lucN pond) and uMUUlIp, NMI etlu
wbmpl obhatlwyo tM Nature lhlrmlwee InrHfbvanEucwiw ORIoyo1 tM UNITCUPACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY and 141rd rlq attxu
by eM olhw al IvrA otAbn, arq MrtbY ratdm aN mninrrR ell that nl Y-0 Anorhaval4r4 a stay do in PIP,Mnb hxmf.
This Power of Attorney is granted under and by authority at Section 37A of the R;.LawF of UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCI
COMPANY which IRO1aibnl are now in full fOICI and effec6 reading n lolls•...
SECTION 1 The SECTION 37A– ATTORNEYS IN f ACT
Board el DYMen, IM Irnrdml. w tnY VNaPbtglnl w Annnnl Vrb Prxgm, WII have Penw aed Authority to: (a) IF,bN. Indithar.ty AltwnryNn 4d and to awMrur IMm to u enblNlf of the ComMNY. bondaab untlnuhr
YPrt/gl obhgatoryln Ih Ntmt thxml,and Dennis l to remove any loth AUoriny,n feet almyumre no! Miapp covet end tulhorhY phanmMm.. a1M
SECTION 7 AuwnryLn NnIhall Nw Navel and awlwndy. lutxt m the I,,ml and hmM1UOnc of rM Pewx or atbrNy N1ua1 to Ihlr
end ddrwr on bill of IM ConaanY. pOndl and uN11ne \Inpl, umpnluncn, rnntrattl of NdP- -y and when wrtrnpl oblq,[" in the M an Ihxa Niteroi,
The fwMble Inl n sal nMluey Iw the Yngrty el any bond, rrld undxlabrol, Y<OpnnnbL tW UK1I o1 IMrmN1Y trd OR. willnpl eblgltwy
IM1r Nature thereof,
This Po.wr of attorney It tarred and I'M by IaOnniy vedrr tM by authority or IM fellomrM Rndutan r PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY at r t"wnp hob on the 78th day of Oetal, 197t, at Ma his -1 be' -rNa w eMNd wWwuonMn1wd u by the Board al Ouxw 1
MnmB d end neH%wl
no,lev Car ^Rrmhrd, that IM upnctwtf of n,0 01,1111x, and oltrcn, a" the m11 or the C"MnY rNY A 111410 to any Pren Powx at
I anal"" w Ifni ml IN-" ne be "l-d I by hWmN, am any m[h Mwu oN rllwnry w M.ubtate Suing mch NnimA In' IINIM1N IrpNl hr tIt N11.1had al hall M v�lq and yrld,ro on"Fa 1 L.Py, any earn Pewr to e1eNIM Ind Yltlfnd by
ueewbtrrym wnRh n n,ttatlnd" tinny M tM IPtwe twih wlMO to any bond w
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the UNITED PA'IFIL INSURANCE COMPANY NI bwxl IE1te Pxunu to M IipnM by Ib Vjw V,,W,nl, Ind 11, mimes
YM go be MlHO aI11aM, that 111:1 daY el N6V IB 72
UNITTO PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY
(IDD /' STATE OF Wflahlnt[OUNTY OF p10CC0 L E %CCUCi Vfl Vna Pr lgml
on lhl, Llth dlrel May 1972 NOkRIS E. BROWN
MrY..r.1r –+x101
io rive known to W In1 VreFmtl nt Pe the UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, at.
x\noMadped that he •retutrd and nosed trio lernor"I Isms nenl atq afford Ise YM Of Yd twPxMloh Pirate, Ind tNlSenbn 27A, 1
AW2o11M a' Um of 'I'd Contrary -W 'he R'Wwaq 1111wth lhxem,Ire litllln 1Wl lwtt SIIIOn
MYCammwtan Eaprx'
ar r.
t9 —mL 'fe;yA, cL Y
'!iiiA ' Nottry PutNP in Ind Iw Sou o1 �D81it1¢tori
n.0 O
RngapatTucarA
Aununt S1wnuY or rM UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CrtMPANY tle hxrby brdlY NMI d
apdw tM Iwrp.ro n a hue and moan Naha el • Powr of ADernet• eaNu,N by Y.d UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CW IANY,wh1N b Idll N 1.
IwC1Ilq 1N11t
IN WITNESSWNEREOF.1 lYwhwlune Yl my Nndandalh+td tM lul oluq CemM that
ry .ZLLll day ol_ TYTV 19]�
�
WOOUla71 9137.72 .gA - /A�n L �Ia,a�rvI� uarY