Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978/12/20 - Agenda Packety�a7ath�z�"T t3? h .1. I J i 4" .. .. _ .. ._, - .eaa•� ::. - a'.� -_.ter E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RegLilar Meeting OAJOrr/^� 71tI'!'*C %d±asc �ilJtfU December 20, 1978 �ia 1. CALL TO OROEA M�^")f • /ha"'• 2 PLEDGE TO Ft Aa. ©� a &^4— a^. - 3. ROLL CALL: Mlkels _ Falombo _, Schlosser _, West _., Frost 4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 6, 1978. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS 040-T //�' �- �� ric, &4, 6. CONSENT CALENDAR: &,,oa . Aa . Q She following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non. controversial They will is acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council member, staff member, or interested party may ro. guest that An item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later dreCaaeien. , ( a. Approval of Warrants In the amount of $221,986 90 . ' b. Refer claim against the city by Joan and Volncy Willett In the anount of $25,000 t. the City r Attorney for handling .. .. .. i C. Request for Alcoholic Beverage License by China Garden Restaurant at 9770 19th Street (on sale beer and wine). .. ... .. ... .__ lx d To set January 3, 1979 for public hearing on a r tit ' s^ -cone Change No. 78 -05 by the Southern California Lutheran Church e 'ro- Zet January 3, 1,379 for public hearing on a ;w Zone Change No 78 -06 by Hone /Gorgen .. . . .. 7 To act January 3. 1979 as public hearing for ' the Land Use, Circulation adn Publlc Facilities r Element of the General Plan .... . 9 h. 6 _9 .. .. .. .... 10 10 . .. ...... 10 To set January 3, 1979 as public hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Land Use Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .. .... ... 10 Tract 9587: Release cash staking deposit of $2,500 to Thompson Associates . .. ................ 11 Tract 9432: Release of bonds to Chevron Ccnstructlon Performance bond (sewer), . .. .. „ $32,000.00 Performance bond (water) ... ...... ..$511000 00 13 J. Tract 9366: Release of bonds to E J C. Constrvecion Performance bond (sewer) ... .$11,000 00 Performance bond (water) ... $14,000 00 . ....... . ..... •�- It. Tract 9288: Release of bonds to r , R. Development Performance bond (water) . .$12,000 00 Performance bond (sewer)... .. . B4OCO 00... ... 19 ;�` e- eft -' :..,r: yi^ -•.,M' -_ »1- rev,:;« -. .. -_,. -. b! ,. r( {,y City Council Agends -2- December 20, 1978 h' r; 6. CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) 1, Tract 9313: Release of bonds to Socaland Corp Performance bond (sewer) . ...... $20,000 00 Performance bond (water) . ...... .,$27,000 UO .. .... 21 m. Tract 9002: Release of bonds to San Miguel Land Co. Performance bond (sewer) ... ...$66,000 00 Performance :ond (water) .. $43,000 00 23 n Tract 5295: Release of bonds to Socaland Corp. Performance bond (sewer). ... ., $23,000.00 Performance bond (water) ... ,$32,000.00. ... .... ..... 25 o. Release bonds to Crowell /Leventhal L Performance bend (water). . ..$24,000 00 27 .. .... . .... t W RRelcwa ds t0 Grlffi Oevelopm rro \ Pyfbrcance b: d {ro 68 0�l 0 erformance bo to,) 36,0:,0 00 .. ...... o�•� v q. Tract 9352: Accept roads and release bonds to I.:.a l:emes located at the southwest corner of • 19th and HeraDsa. Performance bond (road) .. .....$144,000.00 Performance /..nd (water) .. ... 53,000 00 Performance bond (sewer) .. .. 37,000 00 33 r. Tract 9475: Accept roads located at the north- east corner of Haven dad Lemon and release frond to J Anthony Development Performance bond (road) . . . ...$82,000 00. .. .. .. 35 IS Minor Subdivision No. 76 -0642: Release Instrument of Credit and Agreement In the amount of $6,000 from Douglas Nelson Securities posted by Bank of America .. .. ...... ... .. .. ... ....37 t Plot Plan 96 -70: Release of Instrument of Credit and Agreement In the amount of $15,000 to Stevens Foothill Rental .... ... . ..... I...... . ... .. ............ 39 u Tract 9348: Release of cash staking deposit of $2,250.00 to Xent Land Co . . . . .. .. 41 v Request autho Izatlon to attend League of Cities Conference tuthorizatlon Is requested for the City Manager, Assistant to City Manager, Dirnctor of Finance and Director of Community Services to attend the League of California Cities Labor Relations Institute. Funds have also been budgeted for up to three members of the City Council to attend this conference. 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Request for Zone Change No. 78 -02. The change of zone from C -: end M-R to M -2 for 9.3 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Whittram. Submitted by Secondo Colombero. 'r %4 ORDINANCE NO. 48 (Second Reaolnq) All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO i' CUCAMOKA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS y° 229- 151 -15 AND 16, AND 229-161 -01 THROUGH 07 .. .... .. ... 43 i" erg City Council Agenda -3- December 20, 1978 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: (continued) B. An Ordinance to establish an Electric Franchise. ORDINANCE N0. 42 (Second Reading). AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING COM- MUN'CATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN ALONG. ACROSS, UPON OVER ACID UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO 44 CUCAMONGA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 33 . .............. ...... C. Zone Change No. 78 -03 submitted by Walt Selgl. The change of zone from R -1 to A -P on 4 2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street. .. ... ..... ...... ..... .. ....... . .... 48 ORDINAN 7 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL HO 202 - 191 -13 FROM R -1 TO A -P GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND HERMOSA AVENUE ...... ......... 50 8 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS: A. Mobile Home Rent Review Report. Report by Jim Robinson. a ` B. Etiwanda School District Impaction Report. As the City Council Is aware, the acceptance of the Etiwanda School District's Declaration or Impaction was delayed from the last meeting until December 2D. The primary reason the x City Council reruested delay w:s to determine whether or not r the Etiwanda School District could be eligible to file the Declaration of Impaction even though impaction doss not presently exist In researching the city Ordinance No 30, It is quite clear that the School District can file a Declaration of ,{ Impaction If the projected enrollment of the school during the eighteen months following occupancy of a proposed development will result In overcrowding or a number of students exceeds the normal capacity of each school. The Etiwanda School DIS- ' trict has agreed to revise its Declaration of Impaction and add 4 a sixth paint which would essentially point out that any future development will impact the schools within eighteen months after occupancy A second problem which was discussed by the City Council was con- cerning the division of any fees which were collected. It is the recommendation of the City Attorney that before any fees be dis- tributed, there be separate agreements between each of the school districts and the city %h&el would outline the amounts due to each of the districts Council may recall In disucssing the school fee ordinance that $400 fee was to be car - marked for the elementary school districts white the remaining $300 would be available to the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. We have requested the City Attorney to draft the appropriate agree- ments to enact section 13 of Ordinance Mo. $0 It Is the staff's view that all of the Council's questions have been answered adequately. The school impaction fee may be levied I� i a r City Council Agenda -4- December 20, 1978 even though there Is no Immediate problem providing that a problem will occur within eighteen months after a new development Is completed. Secondly, In order to divide the school impaction fees In accordance with the wishes of the Council and the recommendations of the School Task Force, It is necessary for the School Districts and the etly to have an agreement prepared by the city attorney and approved by the respective legislative bodies, RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council approve the School Impaction Declaration submitted by the Etiwanda School District and that Rtsulutlon No 78 -69 be adopted. RESOLUTION NO 78 -69 A RESOLIiFION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN THE FINDINGS OF THE ETIUI.NDA SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONDITIONS OF OVER- CROWDING CROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT. .... .. .. ue�st bathe Vanlr Devc lopment Comoany to Modify the ft Standards on property oca[ed o� n the northeast corner of 19th Street and Amethyst Avenue . teL 63 D. Adoption of Interim Growth Management Strategy .... .. . . ..... 71 E Road Maintenance Contract with the Ccunty of San Bernardino ......................... ............................... 82 F. Reconstruction of Baseline Street. RESOLUTION NO. 78 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SAN BERIIAROINO COUNTY TO RECONSTRUCT BASELINE STREET FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO hELLMAN AVENUE... . . . . . .... . .. . .. . . ... 98 G State LIttAg Control, Recycling and Re:ource Recovery Grant Program. RESOLUTION NO. 78 -72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE STATE LITTeg LONTROL, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE RECOVERY FUND ......... ............................... 101 H. Revision of the Comprehensive Fee Resolution (NO. 78 -25 - RESOLUTION NO. 78 -75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 78 -25 ESTABLISHING A COKPREHE14SIVE FEE SCHEDULE .. .. .. ..... 102 Y'.. s City Council Agenda -5 _ December 20, 1978 O B. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS:. .(continued) ... t1j I. Recommendation re ardin Co in City offices E ul moot for Y V% J Nattona_= Leaou`_of Cities. It Is recommended that the City Council consider Joining the National League of Cities. The cost for Joining the NLC would be approximately $600. This is based upon the city's 1970 census which was approximately 20,000. The National League of Cities Is extremely Important and in many ways similar to the League of Californ.a Cities However, the NLC represents the views of titles primarily at the national are level. The primary areas of Involvement for the NLC are as a voice for the cities when legis- lation is being formulated which may have an Impact upon local government Secondly, as a voice for cities In the formation of a national municipal policy In addition, the NLC offers a substantial number of tra lning programs. One of which is designed specifically for elected Officials. That program has been discussed previously by the City Council although no decision was made to apply for participation. Although the City has not been a member of the National League of Cities since Its incorporation, the NLC as a courtesy permitted the City of Rancho Cucamonga to participate in the organization's liability Insurance program for public Officials. that is a significant benefit which was Provided to the city In an effort to provide visible proof that NLC membership Is a worthwhile expenditure or city funds 112a RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Clry Manager be authorized to enroll the City as a member of the National League of Cities at a cost of approximately $600 ... 113 ® K. Recommendation for Records Management Consultant. As the City Council is aware, It Is Important that the City at the earliest stage possible set up a records management Program which would Include not only records retention, but more importantly, the establishment of a universal system for all city departments Because of the complexity of the Job and the minimal staff resources available, it is recommended that the city contract with a Records Manag -ment consultant to change over all of our files to a common system. In addition, the consultant would provide in -house training of clerical personnel to properly maintain the system once it has changed over from the format now being used The city's primary problem centers around the fact that we have several different filing systems now being used. In tem, a to each ivedrtmant having Its own filing system, ne also recorded a substantial amount of planning and engineering records whit; were previously flied under the County's system. The change -over to a universal system will insure that ail employees will be able to locate appropriate documents when they are neadee. The cost It Is the fstaff's wview dthat i the cost Of themwork Is quite reasonable, particularly since we are In the early stages Of records management program. It is Important that we establish a system which will be In effect for all records which are retained as the city developes. While the de- cision to employ a consultant could be delayed for some time, the cast will undoubtedly go up as will the anount of records which we are required to retain by law. Cou(:11 Agenda -6- December 20, 1978 n B. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS (continued) RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the City Council approve $1,225 from the city's contingency account for the prupose of employing Alan H. Mawhinney, a records r, management consultant to work with the staff In establishing 115 a comprehensive riling system for the city......... . .. LProposal by Diego VI9 •••••••• " " " " " " •• . I .•. •• .••• N. Hl nar Subdl vi sf on ilo. 78 -0194: Accept Bonds by / Mae Nell Lees I(, i Laborr& fitl.nd bond (road) ( 13? (road) $1z 343.64 .. ....................... L RESOLUTION NO, 78 -73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 134 AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION (78- 0:94) .......... .__ 9. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS: 10. NEW BUSINESS: a. Council b Audience 11. ADJOURNMENT 4v� tam: P• fu Pflo Cw0v+ r. �S n ORDINANCE N0. 50 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE EX- PIRATION DATE OF THE MORATORIUM IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE NO. 36, EXEMPTING MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLINGS THEREFROM, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby rinds that: (a) Further time is needed for the study and preparation of a comprehensive growth management program for the Cityt (b) The expiration of Ordinance no. 36 by its terms on December 31, 1978 will not be in the beat interests of the City and said expiration date should be extended as hereinafter providedt ((��,,II q�L�9�,�,3b to exclude multiple'UIW lIy ..te rdin ggcg9..__3bopecatioe oPtheied moratorium imposed thereby, fPbf3"�ff�'° SECTION 2: Section '. of Ordinance no. 36 of the City of Rantc,,� Cucamonga, California is hereby amended y adding Subae4ti.on (d} areto to read as follower t,S1c� , ,A- ....1:,, 2 _ (,_ __ _ f "(d) Mu1ki le family l7rnccl —"� etc(d SECTION 3: Section 8 of Ordinance no. 36 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended to read as follows: " SECTION 8: This moratorium shall expire on W'Uzi -, 1979.° —' SECTION d: This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure necereary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, hea th, safety, and welfare and shall take effect saa iediately upon- adoption. SECTION S. The Maynr shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk s a 1 attest to the same, and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper in general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. I I PASSED, APPROVED AND ,ADOPTED ]this ' �j� day of ij L ,t&AP..A / , 1978. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR - Rancho Cucamonga ATTESTt CiVj Clerk r 'f m 2 ,. 2 .:,�+, �. „• W � , , I^ ` 1 c. S n .P 1. .m P t o Z n W n � a � � .(T� = w. S�' �` •, ��• � „t, ,•._; . -�`i�` l[ OOny %�ja b�I 66 eY+ !3C 1^ s w Q Y n N n m O P n� Y Y 09 n N m � r Y �. n AO' �•ti: 1i � n•: y ..�F.: Ir c, r e 1 M b� ym YCp 1(T� ym 'G< m 0. .Y ..' Y p� M w n b y Y L S 1+ o m O r m ^ n ;}M Y \ 4Y •<� RI r h b 19 Fl D” n Y ' ppi b A P N N N O Ary ��aV • M b N Q P N N Nq t. lS J{ +^,•. P �a O NP AO gp00 m r NP NP n m Y IpLC IL'� OO ftC h0 �m m Y G m C 131ss'�.Ga b h mn c N •� m grad O w ^ C. m • O W V N n O Y O U In pr I�'^ FypL'j �J I/C�. 1 P 1 W w R Y •• O C � A P Qp C[a+ m m m m q m m N W m x m i m q m m n m n m m m � H a ^ ^ I c m w m m m w o ^ o r ppM 4 3 w• NG 1r �1yPy.+.. IY m P•" (1 n V RCm w 1+ r�y{I Y• 6 P�00 ly yam`'•: If•_ ^ r� M w P n .40 r till Y'�i H � H ..vh'•: �• •rr .`i _ 1. _ _ _ � L'yslee- o:aStl :r;l "•ate :�.�'-s.Fs= }_'tip �a ^•"Nt y<'j'L N Z mN(m] n6 myN pP 10, b OtY P 41 .1 {1 N� N09 U Y � N 1 O SRC N O IG-. n n n M < m oNo IY+ 1+ a fb hf o• 'i ld 1 �C m° of to c�4 � N U tpf�n1 Gt N N 1• WK � 0 N Z N .q O-t o to c�4 N N 1• A � 0 n n n n n m m o u K W W W .e n •< n ry I8 < n M Y ,O C C G v OI Y Y Y 1. •• .t:::e'�.tii;±i:.l�,. �'!i„'al`.- .t'r5:: ai' '.dr�.��a�.'wdrT°J.'�l�i _� °� ' 0 x P P P P P P P o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u W e N e N v N v N v N e N v N In N In N In N In N In N In N In N In N u O m O P IO H P'•'1 ti N O m O O O O O f.lPN f 0 ZI O 10 o N 4 n O an e P e n O N o mI(,O "4 ..nm P 1� N m 1•f m e O In O n .mw P � Ir ••1 O 10 n O N e II.1 O10O " 4U;41';4-; m'1 •+ N ti .�.1 e N •+N N N N ••1 M > m V c J u b N V T N G N O U N d Y A it C O d L J N d d w C a P' A O U N d QQ 1.H N ♦I L L [� C U d q r a V N U a l d C u C d N V1 U Nn 1 Q' P 6 6 yy J d a L a N Vf QeNN 111III............111IIIJ rI Y .�" N V J V1 1•• d Y O. \ \ \\ m q 6 U d > N A NN •f. L Q O A NNr10 r• rl a-1 rl O 2 d t ` N 3 d d P O O d P OWN OI � U N U 6 N •�+ b SO L L P • 1 O N A G A q 6 O O O O 41 L L U q J e N O d U ZG' d O. C 6 � O O P U C O O C d � L bNNO C QQW GI-� C � O � C L a M✓ L d A b d D � Y-. O O d a POOmr 00 1 Or N_ NNNNNN W bbJ � W V• p. V U C a O O N a > L V N C O Y OOVf O 1 1 N O N OU• d W p W O• 6 J 1- C 0 6 a S A W S O U L 6 d K O 2 Y O W u O 001 A ••• P 1� 0 FO: U e ••1 In m N m e O ti N 1.1 m 1H e m O F• 2 1.1 1 (7 1 1.1 1+1 1 N N 1•f 1 1 10 1 O 1 1.1 1 N 1 N 1 N Nl 1 N 1 N ("1 1 1 O n O O n ti O O � O O N O O P O O O •"I Vl N Yf .-1 O N In N •-I O N rl .Pw 1n i 6 S Yf U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti 1 1 1 O 1 1 O O K O O O O O 00 O O O O O O O O L O L L O O M N u u ++ In > L al d u q 1 N y 9 O O O p L C C C L P .. J L .. � rt•1 a a a � >. A U O 'j L t $Fj, N 111 C q N VI A VI a-0 U S u qEI VI y1 Ir L C q 2 T A R A N E N O 0 O O d O P A J W O C N a: y ep > > 'Li Y• > U I m m v v ow LOI u 30 u° uJ 1. •• .t:::e'�.tii;±i:.l�,. �'!i„'al`.- .t'r5:: ai' '.dr�.��a�.'wdrT°J.'�l�i _� °� ' w N N N N N N u n TMOMdM rnQOb�m m o binoMmMln N OIMn00� I�bNr+�`_ W •O IO NI�I�a 01'f �Id IAN N10 •D oNal•� OI f� mm••b bl�Ol Yf MNYIMM mMMOT V NMm •O M C O C n C c O C N N �E O q GE N N Om U L 1 m1�W L • _O OI ti \I� Ty A p M L L 1(f N V l s a s C 01M N CI • C \ \\ S G4.1 C N p 1 V FTM /1 a ? 1... p W l 6 O L O iY C LN •ti m .• •-1 •-1 M 6 O Lqi t QS,UL q N I(f d."IN Nm � LU U Uq '$ nCi m•"Ib'•N •"� U � • q gU46 T 1 NbOI IMP yl p {I N L i O1 1 MI 41 a• 1(1 OI A n 1� W a�i U aE L mJmmmm O d Jm V1 JQs i U 4 O160l Ol Ol OI m dM10 .td o00o In m .+m M NNYaNN NNNN N O NN N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti 1 1 p 7 O �OOINO OONO O 1�0 NS O N N•"•^•N NN•-I Vl •-1 N tiQi i U 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Q p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O n O O O O U u° a c a a c � c N O (• M C a 6 qq L a 'Y Fa- y ti ti ti N N N m Qbb.+mb o. o b 00 0 o•'•d b•�Mm o In gov+ M QOI I(110bN10 O O 1'I M In ti Ol�b N•y l0 N Q NvN N •"• n N V a N a c N t L N yC Ea OIL a C N a u •-• sal 0 d N L J y L A T Op C N O: .• a T L H •UO. A L L u �- u a • r C Nr N a J • M MM % w o a O•a- C r ^ My5 JLLEW LN L•-a• W C,N g A E O C a Ju O yI •m `. Qt= L C a A A yI L i ar 11n PU L CU G U 6••�'O •�•'� L •"� a O a6 U`r 'L 1"MA Ar O. m NU17LUm X Q v d Q Q d d N N Q d N N N 1� O n00•-�N O O O O O O O C c O E 1.7 N M N N N N ti N 1 1 10 Q N N A •"1 •"1 b n •q O1� U m OI N a OJ O L ^ ^ EEu m i L a 1a a N a O 1T WO b I(1 m O 10 N N •O O O O N NS 1 1 1 1 O O O O y A S 0 Y O ^ y L m2 A U m E 1 t: 7 la Vl 1.1 p Nf 10 N N p h Uf N p p O 1`•J O O O N Cl N p N N f'1 N O N f7 N N 1'1 N O N Iq N N N N N f�1 N t•1 p O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O ' M L O O a O ti O ONO U O N O Yf N Ilf J N N N n 10 Yl t0 Ol O .-1 N tq Q Yf IO h DJ C. O N O Q N Vl N• it .• N N N N N N N N N V 1•l m O N1 h O O O U I(1 O Uf N th b Ilf I(f yf V1 N .(l N Y) Ilf Y) Yf Yf 1ff N Yf N N N N v N N N fd N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O .•C•. L d q r ^ U U Q L C A 2 N Y C u) N b b d Q) O O O O O OI ••� O b M C O C O O b p O O 'L p N OI N N O O O O h p h N 01 Q hpN • C O b h O N J R .O Ill f•I d• h U1 O m N h Iq N Q Q lw UI 1'1 Z 10 (•l ti N .-I I(l .N•1 N Yf O b 17 Yf Q Iq O 1•f f•1 N O � .b-1 fLi �I< L C p S C O U pL A L !1 Z• F. c C c C d V OI t U d f � U •� Lqq 'O C C Y A Yq L Y L q O O M 1•�c�`] L d Y C N N 7 d O � � q O N h m q L ^ o L d L d N 3 d C = d A pl M O q N L q L d Ol O O "J 01 VI L L O. N d N O d U1 Y O W Y U A b r O i F ]f O U u O C U L d L O d O ^ ] C! q w W (,•J 1 N ^ U O d N U Q 6 6d C L � Z 6 O. 6 6 � � O: U 6 2 O. 4) t O S O m 6 F F 6• Vl 1.1 p Nf 10 N N p h Uf N p p O 1`•J O O O N Cl N p N N f'1 N O N f7 N N 1'1 N O N Iq N N N N N f�1 N t•1 p O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L Y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O M L O O a O ti O ONO U O N O Yf N Ilf J N N N n 10 Yl � ."1 N N Yl Yl N N ••1.11 Il) J .-1 • ti p .+ .+ .• O .-1 .+ r1 r1 .+ rl N .-1 L O O O h O O O U O O h O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O T M 5 C Q c � Y u Y A T N N q d U L Y W M L 11• r O. Q n � A O • L Y O N c d U N > C C O .•C•. L d q r ^ U U Q L C A 2 N Y C Y d d L J O VI d d d C q F d •1! LL q M O 'L N Y Y O at N W C y � O N ff] 'E A ' N J 00 O N G d• C d A G Cq L L C U S C O U pL A L !1 Z• F. c C c C d V OI t U d � U •� Lqq 'O C C Y A Yq L Y L q O O d 1•�c�`] 5 rL.1 Co O d L d 2 c 4 L L S L T_ 'O d6¢uppi O c W p>p\ \tT L¢ L• gYq`9�d \d 6 LOImOgT> > o\\\auomo u ordostbNCn � OOS6442�vwi �I rl •.• M N n n 1 1 1 O O\ a ti N •-1 C i i ¢ O O O 0 N V W C O Ib� b U 1'I 1 S a J W U � VI U Y c d c � W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N/// N N N N N N G q OIQ QtOOngOl Oln F NQOmpb(gNQQVN Ip O .O N N N O Ol p O .-1 Q .O\ /O ��� tW m• -1 Nt0I01 e O O O u y � n N b VfN•11N N NNNN�tiNY0110it1y OOi (9 1n0/ m O H .O`q �I 6 �N N Y o a u°. - d rL.1 Co O d L d 2 c 4 L L S L T_ 'O d6¢uppi O c W p>p\ \tT L¢ L• gYq`9�d \d 6 LOImOgT> > o\\\auomo u ordostbNCn � OOS6442�vwi �I rl •.• M N n n 1 1 1 O O\ a ti N •-1 C i i ¢ O O O 0 N V W C O Ib� b U 1'I 1 S a J W U � VI U Y c d c � c N G q m u y N L y m O d 6 Y o a u°. � d •-• Qd L ip d C d u Y. ILL N r q 3 N t"1 • d M C C L I• L 6 L U AA v > O C O 1 ••q, d 6 ^ (q O d V O d N Q N Q Q O ti N e N (•1 t'I N Q tV •"1 N t0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •"1 •"1 f1 •+ r-1 N b N •ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O O O O O O O O O u o c N - q U U O C «+ L q M tI C N d C L d d O C q N L E q L d C C N d 6 L y O U d d L N d O a n o ` u U O O L 1 d i y n > V 2 O m tD N 1 OI O N Q 1 1 rl O O d Y N A O e o N u o l0 C Y d � A N 1+1 b cl N N O_ LC w m 0 J m a O H N b n N N N N O 1e0 N O OI H � b N r-1 d u C N A L L o � Y N 6 Q y A N O i0 N u ro L O S O Y M C L q d d u L u u A A p1 U N O O m Q N N tO 1 O O OI t0 N •-1 1 1 1 O O O N J N O •J.• Y S m � • N O V J N d Y �• d W N � OC d ".iC'e.1�tr u71 •,..J p1 :Il is .�d ���'•ti+. ^. tti •�. :...+.a ;V � OI S N N N N N N SW U 8 O m 1'1 p m I m T O O C9 % 19 p O N OI C N O. Im'1 n m ti O b N .O .0. Cl °-1 N N N VI Y Y r \ N \ J N � O .V d M 01 N \ \ 1 m 6 Q C b O W b O b O \ 0 K G L d O q J C R O H b r ` 6 T L IV O A ~ O F• d 6 O L d O A Q J O LL 6 V V Y. YO - vl 6 J ♦ N V 4 W m 4I C C N 'r 2 m J O ENE O n � T A N d 6 O h 6 LL d N J W i° .Oy O F- r Jr n OI O O. m ch O. V 6 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O 1 O O N • L q5d W ✓ N b G u d O O VTI l� Y l 4. N d d A U c c A A C A cL C O C m m d A m o d u A u A A O L C A L d 4 Y O O W 6E O C W � U d \ vu O C > C O O J< G N A c 7 T W 6 m N �• "J w W U A S •r ^'K I AXE, i �' ifJ�y'i: /�4 Yiy�. +G'rJ w-fs ,: �, �,ay; 1. .N..� Il. ji � !'. -• „PM ,.,. r� Y K 1 ' �n(ut �i.�ntshr �tfarnrk xt �xls SURE 433 121 EAST SIXTH STREET. LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90014 (213) 8284091 n W^7idc Decembers 1978 c(ry or nm,a r, ilG11 nilvlrN 1 na rI r,EC r ;spa AJM City council Ri8(�JInAl11t(112;81�IU G P. O. Box 793 City of Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: In the Matter of the Claim of Joan Willett, Volney Willett, Claimants, vs. City of Rancho Cucamonga - Gentlemen; Enclosed find original and three copies of claim against the City of Rancho Cucamonga in -he above referenced matter. The accident occurred at th,� intersection of Banyan and Beryl Streets, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on September 13, 1978. i We would appreciate your stamping date received on one copy and returning it to this office in the enclosed, stamped, return envelope. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, t John H. Ernster ­1 Attorney JHE:mm Encls Certified Mail, RRR In the Matter of the Claim of ) JOAN WILLETT. VOLNEY WILLETT, ) Claimants, j I vs. I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, I I I I CITY Of R:.t:,f:o O!"O.AC;IGA Aar: Nr:pyg, nufl DEC '( 1978 Al 7r81gIh1r11 :�i 1 r2r3r9 r�r G 4 JOAN WILLETT sit' VOLNEY WILLETT, claimants, hereby present this claim to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant _ to Government Code 5910. 1. The name and post office address of claimants is as follows: 6220 Kirkwood, Alta Loma, California, 2. The post office address to which claimants desire notice of this claim to be sent is as follows: JOHN ff. ERNSTER, Attorney at Law, 121 East Sixth Street, Suite 433, Los Angeles, California 90014, 3. On September 13, 1978 at the intersection of Banyan and Beryl Streets claimant received personal injuries under the following circumstances: Claimant's automobile, eastbound on Banyan, was struck by the vehicle of Kenneth Wink, northbound on Beryl Street, Paid collision occurred as a result of the negligence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for failing to install or re- install the stop sign or other traffic control sign at the southwest corner of the intersection at the time of the accident. 4. So far as it is known to claimant at the date of filing this claim, claimants have incurred damages in an e M unknown amount, but not exceeding $25,000.00 due to the following injuries: Contusions, abrasions, and lacerations to skull, strains, sprains and contusions to the neck, back, arms and legs, in aOdition, claimants sustained property damage to her vehicle in an unknown amount. S. Claimant does not presently know the names of employees, agents, or contractors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga responsible for her injuries bit will amend this claim to so state the names when ascertained. 6. At the time of presentation of this claim, Joan Willett claims damages in the amount of $25,000.00, representing damages for medical and hospital care, disability, pain and suffering, disfigurement and future medical care. Dated: (9091 /ee 1 Joan Wi'_lett G Volney WYllct -2- ? COPYM.rOrr\ —• .NI .Nn o.NctW,If, AUva film tr.._r..N..I. ... I...al..n. APMICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE UCINSE(S) 1. TYPE(S) OF IICENSE(5) FILE No To, D/yanmenl of Alcal/nIK Nrnopo Control {ef ' :t.: .. ::P::::E; FEE NO. •tar�'.!rj• II: :tl.eY. . . � - 1313 O Street •y+••'Y+A/l�rE Soaomeme. C.0 95RIA• -tt I.L.I I'U.1 LQ__ L b S.nl I Cr I b {. lrj:71. GEOGRAPHICAL rr.........r.. «...,, M)HA LILUL MLIC FATIH CODE ',615 IM urIAr/ipned hereby appGe/ fr ytKenw/ QIAC.B Dot& , d&tn,bld o, followN Applied tmdrr Safi 74044 1". ? 'Z. NAAtElS) OF APPLICANT(S) s Temp Perms f'y M m�� ' CBLDd6 lerna»do A. EReedve Dmo IBBuunce Eflealrs Dam g •w(te -; e < a - , I 3. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONS) FEE tic (�AT'I °. r ' TYPE'!w '? s arsr .00 411, ;�. _.L^N,nr• .td r•' +•• 1-• AlQIJA); .184.80 CT 20f- 4 Naaw of Bmsdnrl L r .r a CELlna rant 1 wn uR.ata SadrdNmbs and Stnar :4 (YM —19th at. P. 91 0'1 61L B�4RD 1,8= he tPFcEIPr No. tool 5 484.80 ' 1 e. 7 A" Ft= Ine S,emyp Gtr I7 d Teo Lo, Ilona I. . /Amity Add,", Of dflnent from S)— Number and Street ar•..f (I .) •'� V. lwve yams cm been comiaed of a Weary? 10. Have you ern violated any of the prorillom/ of the AlcoholicZ ' courage Control Act or repalo6on, of the Depornnent p&r•� t4o fWwny to the Act? hL �, il. E.viafrl a aTESw anlwn w Rrm 9 or 10 an m ottochmem wNd. %tall be deemed pnt of 1H/ opprcoflon. •a� +. 17. Appkant arm (a) that any ana,4wr employed in or -tote Rc.med pemitel will hors all the "triicolwn/ of o Rcen/ee, and W41Q(b) dtla he will not vWaw w cart or anmic w be vicloted any of the ce"smona of the Alcoho0c flevrraae Central Act. Caunry of 34_1 14=ffrdlno.y_. WK .. . N awp.r...r\ parr aa.r tie•.,.. raa,.r I.aa., mast N amx al r 4 6111.1+, . rr If b -Mrt.. — .b. I b .eeaw/ w.l« mammad Y b amawtp� ..WW,' y, — ,Ie.1.ed ,. re M ,.rW.nr 1ik 4MI at-M Y tae ,M ,4 lmn. rlre rern•wl.. r .w, I\. tr.w, Mwr we 14r ..& W IN at M. ,M,r., . n.Y — M, al M ...w..+ M ,b. b •Mkrrt W r.en,1. (r r, L . Y4•.t Yw.K I.....M ✓.. wa,r. I..rr w r r..e+w/ ...M b Gunn 1.r wM6 r, Ma,-.. 4 rhea IN Y b ammat..r.—e.. anae... wJ•. Y r .w► r -r 6 a -r. N . 1.11.1. MY .. ww.I W �e M •I•.,r O01 M. a•W b M r, ,Id b ,—M. MaaoM— Y W wall b a•..,r... e.•^ - ....,tw.�ir'R a/'Iw —� .p% .` a y .r, an tw a a..,r.., w r am ...It..wowl...., r .w... as ..w,. Iw r F, i��"RhN1wCF "."E?",a SIGN ARE ' /"' , � �. �— ADfdIHISTRATIC11 SIGN HERE Z ,�.- r....r. a.. f Y L _ Se -- I<r_ DEC 111918 ^ ' APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR - tID1Vi1UllIl t1i2l3)9fSjrS 7{15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Camsnty oI__ __ —. DRt& U or...•+r w awl+.. r.s oar .ar.. nar•.r .a..., I.1ra, seM a.. rrw {II w 4 6 pl.rr. r — ..ww. wk. N b en..r'iar^VII 1 I.r.pl•e ✓. •a 4,. I...MI wlarw/ a amt m 1 f11 M 4 b..r w-w ..abr....wr..a., ."r-I., Y Y.at Y en Mph. &sMa ero W IMaw rr/ .a ar,IM .�. Y b raaL.r1 ../ . I, ma I.Lr,. w b •At• MrOr .a Mt .a,Y,aar r JF 1� i ..A ww.. 4 aanwa/ I, b aY.n.r T M .r Y4.r raaR..e.. w ar.r.a. aw/w M na, I.a4 4 .andY b r.....rt / a I.w r y 1.10 % • J ./.rr.ia r.•wi W ran w. Wna Irv. ry...1 6 .r, r aYd b MJw - �•,rIa.arfwrre l. V b r RIr rr w.r r arta f ,r ar ar.1 t•Im�"/ I .dIw i ar ry 4 4 M b . — 0.t - r . r I.L r .s . WV N w ...,iw1 M411 mam, e.arM trr r r r Y pw l. r M gmamma A lQ Nen+efA eF lkemeNd'a` ++ .. 17 . 4nnnnuN.t nF llem .Fil Fr M laCaparl N'Oan attd Street city end Tip Cade Caamty, 1^ Jd,•i a . , •"` sr,:sti? Not Write Relota ThL Idnei For De)wtmrnt Uw Only 0". O Recorded rldln, Fidudety pavan: r�l�D Re.uwmh Fa of t11 M1v1 ! • _COPIES mmw_12 /n/'14_ _., •___ cc" at {ef ' :t.: .. ::P::::E; trY�•� :c'T`edtlK^37F •tar�'.!rj• II: :tl.eY. . . � - .Y .r 4.lw.'iaFk+AAb' r • -1'-r !� •y+••'Y+A/l�rE Fr M laCaparl N'Oan attd Street city end Tip Cade Caamty, 1^ Jd,•i a . , •"` sr,:sti? Not Write Relota ThL Idnei For De)wtmrnt Uw Only 0". O Recorded rldln, Fidudety pavan: r�l�D Re.uwmh Fa of t11 M1v1 ! • _COPIES mmw_12 /n/'14_ _., •___ cc" at 1A CTIY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 1978 V ', TO: ,l T, City Ms=g.r and City'Council, YRCMj Jack lam, Dfiector of Camounity De'velopment SUBJF=z CONSENT' CALMMAR V, S a it Yle"c set the following items on the cement caleadam Ra 1.: Zone Change*No. 78-05 - Southern California tuther2n church for public hearing before the City Council on January 3, 1979. 2.' Zone Change Ro."78-06 —Eme/Cargea for public hearing before the City Couacil on January 3, 1979. 3. Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the Central Plan - Set public hearing before the City Council on jimary, 3, 1979. 4. Draft MmIrommmatal Impact Report for the Land Use. Circulation and Public Facilities Elecent of the Ceneral Plan - Set public hearing before the City Council an January 3. 1979, �eww�■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUH DATE: December 20, 1978 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9587 — Release cash staking deposit of $2;500.00 Location: lying east of Haven Avenue and scu0 of Highland Avenue Sbudivlder: Thompson Associates Development Corporation r. 0 Box 338 Car1.:Lad, California NOTE: Certificate from 3 H. Hadole, Engineer, states that all final monuments have been set and he has been paid It full. 1 TALE: f • 66 lau S or S aum i RACT 1110. 9537 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN SERNAROINO r-r.s /•wNr.••o•...lc .•e AY:I ItrW' \� YK{ IKNIPru Nrublbrwbltl�t. u (Y rows q w utl•Ydo. \:n1 q Yure+. Y, 1 s�Ynr 1" •1n I an 1.4Nrn \n t t• a • r nra. 1•Ylq • cs um r Y.¢•at lmrh Kwm. \n Y ir. r - •Kraw4 r r lul\. u \u (u i r i -i.iu iangr`vii4 �oucria .i�imi In tut\ 1. ii.r a r.o,r a rr..tu r r.. •.u• rsama r. •.e. r.h-is .nn •r nclro r r r luY P 4u •o . NI-- Ornwl \( IMI . L I t I.OI(nn NIbIK rn \•r( 4N[. •11 lYn Yt \\ 10n. •DIY N•4rl to Ntl„ n(JY I•IW \ YfY'Inrt, /ghyKa�•___ B b41 (!n� "([4P( (I[0 M.i 1•D. P Mle Y q rltt. KIrSIY rrI •1-ti q rin ,14t I( n(b 1. 1N glKr q -n MA/rl rYr Nr4t KY••.'YhY C.N • I.Ylrn(t (Mar Khtlq'r •ru( .' .'(n(,•C /y / NI -• O11. i(Nn Kh \tq�l ll(Y Yd II Ir /. %nYq — i = •.�•.e• � a1.,.t +. ti AYR• -.flS [L_ _ _ I +IUMUwc- /a. � wv[w[ —•_� �°�..r- J� -_tLj �_ jell � � _ •; -- l�n„ -,,. . i.1' S• Z 1 •_ran . xv..a. -,c a 1�r1 r ___ec• -may ! a ��It-- � -.- .. eJ (.• u�F I.0 � 1 � "l� � _ -- =rte^ -L a 7 •I (1 t -,_ - Y'( ° �� ' � • 3 � I S ',Y I 1 y �•9' +�. Y �r`i -j-I �� n j � •a }a i t � u \ }a� / �� 1 � i ^•. s ��{F •'ern � .� �: �'�P'N.�(1�+~ u • rrrw„ ,�.. „r. �"6�rs vta. LUU -���� tar . %�� / y` •yi S� 0� u � r>r •1 t e•r...'...' f.�«�'/' 4 r �`� ; � ±a li� ♦i /sI( ♦ /� rI' vra..:'n': �orri .. `+er.itlmr :.- .....,:e(� ��ila C ,/r•M�.,'•r •' ✓•� �7`•�.' •c'C�.b i �•<`.�^ n � rrr •d ^} �'IFZIP Fr-s'� i!R ^I�IT/ q rYrIR• flw KrI.iIR•P rN Kn tln q rt(flpl 1 \. nIK t <Y i �.y � I /JT �i� t• tl' n• l (Y nnl0tr 1. n t1all11. I !Irt •II.- ln t 12 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20. 1978 TO: City Council PROM: Lloyd Hubba. City Engineard� SUBJECT: CONSENT CALEIMAR TRACT 9432 - Release of Bonds Located on the southeast corner of Haven and 19th Street Owner: Chevron Construction. Inc. 1512 Eleventh. Suite 101 Santa Monica. California 90401 Performance Bond (Sever) $ 32.000.00 (Surety) Performance Bond (Water) $ 51,000 00 (Surety) NOTE: The construction fo sanitary sever and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 10131/78. 13 IRIA & rq®. mn, IN THE COUNTY OF BAN DERNARDINO YIro Y SYUmY �w • ,mono- m m Ypw na+10- u. II/r.Ta rtY.M1 O fY�Y.•41'.b'mYTt > n111W 1� ... 1 it M1.Ot\ • G \fOCI.11\ IMC. It.VIGRr 1)lT .^ r.�l r' M= ji•y- I }r�1�1r'''' I LTiT�.7 1 �llt,�'�aT- ;•w. 'rh„ 1 IwY. SCE GNUT YO l j. ..y. I 9 1 1 1 413 iiF :9 I w i VDEX MAP 47 ul a •ro pb� iw ^ .i..m II'n IY YY' $ T ai I Q y •e. -{ rwC- �ll.`7'.y �5}FFtr PtA.., gg{ra ©+ 3 yy}u „n» 1 1�T:R� jtyI Mu _ i__ 5a•n>.nr iS-I� g •EiB 149 3 4 Ili 02 .b �';-� '- '_____�•B ovl Fig / .. :: K-A, .M.:: Ax i .I 114...64 / ' -- t`:r'... a Y,roF• 8 � � lIC ✓« a�♦ . • r r 16"°°'. frr•,�e• i � :..::5: ,% 'a i ♦ c' ) p i I tee•, ,,a. o `. /r .rr�66 t trr reMrr 3 • }I �wNW,f $ .i ,,.r •Y-a�r yam• � • 1 ; •Y F4 I. >n I\, so:i- '�`- ►o V ICTOR A M� r" �r J - — -C,.rr ur.n' —� -� R S _� I�I ��M _ r »Ym ..I -_.� - "'•' •..... r [ r """• SURVEY DfrA /LS \a.�m Dier/n�r' /.7ire� %Lelfri �. r.Y b m u t __ /_ J rr tY01n..•. b,G. ry /C. r Trca.. •e e.nv w,l,u as u,u w Tlz R+nwa tl uR tY •r[wrt rt1Y0 f rY Y• n• l If f.PY m YRm w aVlnl .3 MmaC .. ,u tY 11 I.US rl . m rOY' a tl nY YY..p,., rVJn} nt' rW 1. , . 1•°Iniu „iWR r°Iae ,\ Yerro. ± r • - 6Dltvrf ,n r o.r. IYm rlrr. nwo . rJ. 1Yli a ipGlDirff�[~IYtr'[. 1•I�• YtLM1 r 131.1 It,Vrllr I I -N•a wVM[. Y4atf3 [!YG..IG[ .bn0. yYt ''e_1!- `i.<Kp fR r.M1 ry TU rrt YIG LTwtl mYT.�.L�t•.VIAA r» +t ants. 1• I,tr u rw.n Imo sumo. ;h nr.w n. Y,a uu-t• nna •o nYU. es. ,Rp r°. LL .n• Yf. t.Ni a. Nuff ,Rrt.-IY {OluTn. y Y f. a. ,mr>w wlulro moo ant. tYi iuR Na Y YM .I S.. v • c i un•' n3.P3[S !Ir CL'f,i a• .ffernnf. a >w {w. 4..M GK o tl Titf[f ff. _ILNr Yl rr,tY1YY1LL Y I,lm� la ar,f1 d 14 ttNrT 1N.ilp. ra .. - nYUm rw n urvnm•s revin. [.\.of. - I.°luw ruY,T SNrnm•f ruu rca. \ • r e. [. - Su elu.raa u:ai ouuu uuvR r s....r a.or . e r .e �. r3.T o•.V 4 ^u ." 1 �' =ai i `+t'�_}.,`s";5 y.yR.• •"�:?:�- jtii.w!�'±- ;t'.:., � ,!. -. �.:m F. -. � _ _ _ -_ .�•.. t. _ -.,: .N v Vr � • •60 .. 1.Ilr :t. or TRACT I40. 945 IN THE COUNTY OF BERNARDINO rllr• ..mK,m1.�M a ...I.;,d � „� � (...(.,_ ,.. all ru.wu 1 "mrn, r +. lyn n • .twulno w.mu, •I.OtI 1 .1 \0(w111 IK. �'I� ••'• • 7 /4oc Rif :S.Yr.. '�U • •tFituilruJA• ,w.. .,,..•..•. ...u.. 'atAE@T •� `�...�. �'ww�itr. .v.jwr I LM!' II • .•. � •' 1 • , .(i Y '• �•r '• t razz t: 23 24 26 27 II•• zR� :3 :,�: ,�,K SI':✓.:'�an_�¢ra._ 1•et`+n!'CJ .Z w 21 i. ¢�.{ 2 3 �' (+ 6A . „•.n ' x AVENUE . 4 31 1 m • E i` ��d•. .r, �� r.•...._ 1 .ew_� �i iZ9 1 i 'P20 t �r:{ :•136 •li t! 33 P. d: {. ¢•• rr„l 33 r: 34 f 3.. + n I p 19p1r« 1 t. ! E , 37 3, .�•'. i ....... £{ .e.�d- .... -. .. ». ^ I6, 36 i%' w....m. ✓• I/in nn�t ,4[t(d l,L<•i :117 pit ;1 Yj 4S i t vJ. J n � � � %• I6 i i• W �t j � ~ 1 40 LI C i 15• tf Q a 41 j. r %v 14 4 :M1 a: 5 n '1 R •i2 t 1. ' 13:.... t' 1 J43 i..;a 44 AI- ti xn a = ci 1 10 t li Y- F -.� 9 47 'm: jii �'•: • I j , �- .e•m1o.J I I III I B Y•• 1 In .I 49 xI a 111 NO z i 'tom-• •Pr • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORA1iDUM DATE, December 20, 1978 TO, City Council FROM: Lloyd tiubbs, City Enginaer4 SUBJECT, CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9366 — Release of bonds Located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Haven Owner: E. J. C. Construction 6 Investment Company 333 South Beverly Drive Beverly (tills, California 90212 Performance Bond (Sever) $ 11,000.00 (Surety) Performance Bond (Water) $ 14,000.00 (S�,rety) WITE: The construction of the sanitary sewor and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 11/9/78 l6 •v%- F5 +:i1 Jt: �•'�� -•• - },qr. •, ' :. _ •,� : ^t { r. f ,�'t••' +i, .. ..l ).; .�1 r..•1 fr;{•���e:�ld~ I c• r• +o• SN[ET : a a sans TRACT NO. 9366 N THE TH04LOR IN ID'T TERRITORY Of LIECOINTT ce fa MO +SVSpV131DN O!•RORIgM OI LOTS a AND 4. RROIANI'04 TRUST F" ASSOCYTX)N PER LIAR RECORDED IN DOOR IA• PACE TL Of AIMS. RECORDS Of THE COWTR OF SAM SERMARDMD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA .!f!'1l M. _ IwCNE AAO AVLADC 1.1. r �••I H•wII/N IV• Liy �: iiirrML'Inw lNw rrrf� /�Ii ir� fII 'I� 11r REMANpER PARCEL :NnNrv• "NCR AVINYZ w.r/ I/a +/ E All. RI , � IC '7d 1 iiieuii: .1 • L M� ILL�� •I 1 q e /+ H iri1l/ pC ft IT +b 7b17b w it f[C fMLLl MO. J •L e:Y P' .—VP INS. /NY Sry NM /� IN II f�•yIY _•- /�I(YII %IYKI. I/f✓1wN NIII/�Np.rf �I I /r .1I /. /I.NI11I✓Wi11N..NIq w•I l I•r /• IfIWO I N /IJ N• I /.I rf /O.nN Iy NIIIIeIf b l/I N •II III fNwl. /ra /II II /YI/ NI/O I /I.I• IINI.II NrN /•✓I/ /NIYwINWN /.N • e nlfl //I r.wq.11 //�N. I. �f .w /r! /.•91 /O f C .. IIII I•I ./rf lllr Illiue .f/Nm .r. rlNwrgwl i. //w/ I. I,f/ In • Ow NN•II/ NfK/ / eu naKfn• ewa+s unYS• Iv r rr.Kr rN fI ✓N I w{f I% M I /III YII/ 1I e.IfL Y f..1 /Ir If/ 11 r1/ I. Yti // r•O..I /1 fI✓II INr/I •f /I IIIOIMY • L }YYOKIIf/IMYI / /I /nIi•. /YVNr/I/ w S.NIf1 rNIM1 wI1 Y10/ e1 _Y.O / fII11 wy //I NIL. NIIIry NII J I f1 t 0/ IOLIII/ II•eIr•IY•.�I!/•III MIr•M /•IIrf.I 1 Ni�Iwwl•.. /I• 4/NIn 1.rU• S .�I »,:•s1 � I / Y I � 1 k yl t t i IM /.IM �T MIII �1TI —' ^Iw Y/nNwl /wnr Iw /NI•I ND!/ NAP / /4I Ir III u `:a"��'Lrs.',: r : y.! -f+�'c 'E•^.....as•(.rl; . v....;,�I •i •_.I•N.. Imo:' ;,r A.. :. :o -'z•• • _ ; � is ; _ :ilk ,•f•. �C,'!•V`�.•. '4`. �i'' !�+.j.�,: •'/ Y• '7 . ;, r'..'�•• fib• �4'n,t i-. /n!. •AM'LtE.` ay.ii' `'Y• c f.FO' i S w } e �J • i �EWA 'EF ..�.: }. B TRACTNUJ. 9366 °[ET 3 O j SHEERS M 1ME IMNCONIOMFTED IERMIIpRT OF THE COUMTT of SFB BE.M.Mawo BCBIC F NIBD•TI {qM 011Ip1igM 01 LOTS S MO F. BNOMS1110M T"T /UNC ASSOC T N PER MU RECORDED W BOOM N. PAGE iS." MFRS. RECORDS 01 THE CW TT OF SAN BERMRRdMO. SIFTC or c"IFORMF. d[t dNL[T FO. t I' I r ltFCr RAJ. d0•. u L F / Jr- of r.,: ri••Iwte :L ryn�•.n iS_Yr'�"; -4••i L.- ..t �•,1FL���'�:...Ca._ ....��.. _. ` �f �i 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM. DATE: December 20, 1978 TD: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engincerg SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9286 - Release of bonds Located on the north side of Lemon west of Haven adner: G. S. R. Development Marcos Anzueto 6111 Garfield Street Chino, California 91701 Performance Boed (Water) $ 12,000 00 (Surety) 1erformance Bond (Sewer) $ R,000.00 (Surety) NOTE: The water and sanitary sewers were approved and the bonds ready for release by the Cucamonga County Water District on 12/14/78. 0 h rs.�e TRACT NO. 9288 W L'MACORPORATLD riwR /TORY Of TNf COUNTY Of SAN RCANARDINO JUADIVISI TROSTLLaS i:,f [OMPAN i YR1CT3 NO AND 30 z, ASF 3C'R MAP RLCORDED IN M : JQ PACE JI. OP MAPS, RLCOROS OF TNC CL W7Y OF SAN DLRNA : NO, CAL rORNIA. ANDRfASLN LRCI,.•LLRIAG CO SCALE, 1 . W' APRIL Ia(D +.^•9 r ,• •rum•! •..b.n h M. Y/rI/r!N d IYa. A.ry <,nYd/rr /YYb M3Y /Y, Y• wlyyr m /nf 4.,. r /MU.gf h Yr aw L I•.f•wr . >fW. N•1Yr M.ws<.A! /t W/efy"r ACL pet and✓/ew Al /rrr/.., rraYtl dAe<(tl w✓oye •>.dMnib /A.V •,VSr//a4 >ACl INr Yf/rMUa dd/•ci b(Inrf, uWo .•b/,rY 1,1 nt a e :r p.N• i Lw •. /.vrr tr L . <Iref rip. p. LI 4/W rook.. ACL p4 , L• rNlt- /AlMpwiwrl a✓ /.x., ✓Mn dA✓Jm Nrrr. \ 3 QAI,(•/e. nivMN. hr.iL of aYrr Pl rArW4d I <•. .'.Uai d /rr rMII RAa. tl Mr d /<. d /A. a &S —a. IrilAMrg ar disc• L4r. I T a( /a. m loN e td •A•Y • Acura Haas[ • 4I M.rw /,...wy4y AUr /YY wYMr44i 6.VAJy I(Ob qq.. Aar lyy ACL YTMn R A(r N�Ar,rilN r.wr,r � 11 /r arlL,l M/Y.3 <w �rir/r L' 7 S` irlr•rr .wrd•irlM N,r /AM/' a•��rr r ./Ny tsiiaa . ti r K4e Yra(r f <tlY'W wa• � fr ~mil /„nmtM P �` /M ,L��—••--�� —.. y •r( =.t` ter~ rnr/tlr rr r. `Wµe i�i+ri.i'r 1 u /mm \ did i L' 7 S` m r Y M i i O y � Y � a ; t —_3 • Y � ! y LOT is t y lb� —� i l N i �$ C5 T i • o G a n -- —A(l /P � is ti a + • i i if . tg e �' a YA •3 �: x.((..11 i L�1� i /• i 7 —f1� rlm r t _ tlavrr law lac_ r $ t!r/DN Lr .rAr /M ,L��—••--�� —.. y •r( =.t` ter~ rnr/tlr rr r. `Wµe i�i+ri.i'r 1 u r ` CITY CW RANCHO CUCAPIONOA MEMRAMDUM injVME: Deceebcr 20, 1978 --TD: _City Council +{ -PIM:.Lloyd Hubbs, City Fngiseer;ol ..SOFUEGT: COBS13tr CALENDAR -7RAC: 9313 — Release of bonds located on tLe south side of 7th Street between Hellaan and Archibald Avenues Owner: Socaiand Corporation 860 Town and Country Road Orsoge, California 9:663 Perfotnance good (Sewer) 52'.1,000.00 (Surety) Performance Bond (Water) $27,000.00 (Surety) WM: The sanitary sever sad water systeas bave been approved by the Cucaaooga Co " Water District on WO /78. 21 �I i /4I i'/YN.II /V,r.I,fyrl�YHrr.; ♦ w/,aI IV �l rJw/Y/1.✓ I! .l4/i1V /.rYY% /wMyw.(/pa�p Hl//�f /JV JI /�y.IrY/J //ViV/YYN � , /.,�Yr/ V/ Jlr l/II/ /IirI�OI / /JIIII /gi„/aI) YI M'Y /Y I,wN M( /r/.lil J /tr/NNO H /YwIw H ✓/r/Yy� � rVj %' /„�I,Ha /p.y,V /O If /bM�l�,Yp /.VUJ �/ Ir /KJ w Vti'JM/M /wY �__I /��aua / /.�.,i.r.ri rvawHJ.a.rwavw/ - _J _ 0f1AC %' Ivs J/./wJ r.vl w..✓/ /ro../+V r /lJr4I � rr.F 1���' irJa l //J wnf //J !.i ✓ /Y /nv) /y I /yeI t / ` ✓}hp�J�MYIIMyJril /qJ / - / /4 / rain. /r %;rI //lil wa/IAMI /4[K 22 1 sY[cr s of • f.rcrs TRACT N0. 9313 Stfw 1 2,41 Y tY • pmt of 7.9 PANTY " IYCI " U S KIff C49 - WINIIN Of TYt Y tntlfi tJK• OYINItN Ol MCI" If, 10•Y1INI I scuta,NIYCC I ws" LLY /fftft- bM Y(npIJY,M T11 CdWIf "$IY fta..l N0, Start a CJWaIOY•, AS SIOwY pl TYC 111 11 IY A- UO L/ , IS nx YII N[CPCCOw SOON • w YYS.MG( f, W TYt WfAt tY Imf C01f111 NCCCICtf CJ SAO lOWf1T TYOYIC O YICYICYIN *CC 1 BOUNDARY MAP foal lrJld w1~0 1 1 Y i I � S /4I i'/YN.II /V,r.I,fyrl�YHrr.; ♦ w/,aI IV �l rJw/Y/1.✓ I! .l4/i1V /.rYY% /wMyw.(/pa�p Hl//�f /JV JI /�y.IrY/J //ViV/YYN � , /.,�Yr/ V/ Jlr l/II/ /IirI�OI / /JIIII /gi„/aI) YI M'Y /Y I,wN M( /r/.lil J /tr/NNO H /YwIw H ✓/r/Yy� � rVj %' /„�I,Ha /p.y,V /O If /bM�l�,Yp /.VUJ �/ Ir /KJ w Vti'JM/M /wY �__I /��aua / /.�.,i.r.ri rvawHJ.a.rwavw/ - _J _ 0f1AC %' Ivs J/./wJ r.vl w..✓/ /ro../+V r /lJr4I � rr.F 1���' irJa l //J wnf //J !.i ✓ /Y /nv) /y I /yeI t / ` ✓}hp�J�MYIIMyJril /qJ / - / /4 / rain. /r %;rI //lil wa/IAMI /4[K 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ME140RANDUM IIATEs December 20. 1978 1y0: City Council ?ROMS Lloyd Hibbs. City Rogineer SUBJECT- CORSFNr CALMAR TRACT 9002 - Release of bonds Located on the vest side of Sapphire at Fumalo Street Owner: Sad Niguel Land Coapsny 202 Fashion Lane. Suite 101 Tustin, California 92680 rerformaoce Bond (Sever) $ 66,000.00 (Surety) Pertornance Bond (Water) $ 43,000.00 (Surety) LUTE: The water and sanitary sever systems have been approved by the Cucamonga County Water District. W 23 I$ Af Nm At: RF RKARO HC pc,/./zm• /tl •� \ ;, S sla sr /s� AS OF LO 4, r•, G, IC, ANO 12, BLOCK 22, CPU- l IR BOOK G GF PAPS, PAGE 46 4LC01:03 OF SA11 W h I T x1 1 .. I l4/ 2• /P. leyyrA.c'E7tP, fo. c.o `'t P. i{gea , ?y2.:� y! .— •"y./••�- �:sa+re. —r zrr�- -a.� <:. � /1.J a•f'� :.��` s•.r.�cs�•r...�. -;,''}}jpp(( �p�� Soulh hne of /39.'•t.5a •IIN y%,. !. — :I ° JA O U Iy - -.. �fcic of 70 4 'vl 1 neerc � Eera: ^- J POO• Sd � 3002 2 I S+uJA Jena of 1 ti 0 y n y .ZI V / / I6 yr ly' �a.� � • C7TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 1978 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer4A SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDARWWYYYY TRACT 9295 - Release of Bonds Located on the southwest corner of 7ch Street and Archibald Owner: Socaland r4rporation 660 Town and Country Road Orange, California 92663 Performance Bond (Sewer) $ 23,000 00 (Surety) Performance Bond (Water) $ 32,COO 00 (Surety) NOTE: The santary sower and water systems were approved for construction by the Cucamonga County Water District on 11/28/78. 7 BOUNDARY MAP .. r .. ,Lk:L[w r/-J Jr _�._ •/neo /o i t J.IVUti .M�•.r.f.../r.r,I fxlL' . Y J.1N.•.',w: o-: /..r.7 `r .�.i :JFrx ♦ TRACT N0. 9295 i 1 •aWO • iNGM {KN w • IG11pY w )K 1MIx OK •Kl1 JYw M�i •.Y =w 11 Aftl /M•.H•rwr Ixt iQ11N[•fl ONL- OYNIt[I1 0 1K WIIxIU) OJ• \ // � �. saggo iR N111RN w 11Ct6• TpM]N+1 {OUTM, /JNGL 1 Yql, "fit -Y` {1N NNMIYWG YI IM.N x( wy Wo, Lttl[ w C4V ♦. JL {NM4 w ON I K [/ at 1 c IXJ - - - - - -- YggJ 1LM01. y rl 111 KCM<0 N 4]ON • w YYy N[( ♦ rlc cr fflmnr {, N )K w /r:( 01 TML COVNI♦ •l(w0)• w {110 <WNTC BOUNDARY MAP .. r .. ,Lk:L[w r/-J Jr _�._ •/neo /o i t L w J "ET{ {c•u � r.:ou .. I„ IP ��y_ � r /rrN •'wr NNi /xJ/h.rw•1rrJ_lrwr.y ,Lk:L[w r/-J Jr ^_� /� /M+JrJw ra.r.,•,. i t J.IVUti .M�•.r.f.../r.r,I Y.M /JYK IIr/.✓.rNnM'Y . Y J.1N.•.',w: o-: /..r.7 `r .�.i :JFrx ♦ r •no-e /w r�rn i 1 JYw M�i •.Y =w 11 Aftl /M•.H•rwr \ // � �. saggo iR "fit -Y` - - - - - -- ♦ rlc cr fflmnr II- ��y_ � r /rrN •'wr NNi /xJ/h.rw•1rrJ_lrwr.y ,Lk:L[w r/-J Jr ^_� /� /M+JrJw ra.r.,•,. /•r•J✓a F•/.'oJwa NV Fpr _ J.IVUti .M�•.r.f.../r.r,I Y.M /JYK IIr/.✓.rNnM'Y . Y J.1N.•.',w: o-: /..r.7 `r .�.i :JFrx ♦ r •no-e /w r�rn i 1 JYw M�i •.Y =w 11 Aftl /M•.H•rwr \ // � �. •J/•,•,�/MrVi v +w- ^•� \tG' ryr..,FwY _/ -Y` II- /J/w+w r. / ar arr6( r . y �• � ug4'�.`rs..�.�'s�_._ = S'= 'egi�,iiaq :";ki =' +nF....x r__. v _ _. ._ _ _ '� S •v4'4 0 _ «. ._ r�v_c�,`�'. y� � � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM x i DATEt December 20, 1978 � 'r " 'u TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR k 'BRACT 9397 - Release bonds Located at the South aide of Hillside between && -.h)st i ; and Hellman Owners Crowell /Leventhal 1260 Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 ' Performance Bond(Water) 924,0)0.00 (Surety) NOTE: The water systems were approved as to construction by t the Cucamonga County Hater District on 11/9/78. Y' h fr I l 1 i F }.iR���'+��:yy �49`aC �t ^�- 6.. r. �.•.`�i�eY•i FaCy�J;.,r.v. /. .. .,`:- _ i 1 TRACT NO. 9397 SutC7) Of 3 11„tt1S lu Ial IDUI.II 0/ ft• Clfati01i0 bSOCIW CO [MOM[[[S N IMi 1 fu®Ii11101 Cl fY(ttf 1 4C{i0l S O IIt4l NO 3vfS AS gfOgCD W IVgI IW OM/aaf0.C4VpIM4 ICd 37 IIQS D tlq 11 gC0103 or S4 MtW➢IW CIWII [LLVOTIt 1 I 7. A "/I /d17 1-'*44 AL91 °'+r I I I I 1 I tl to I: .. •I wl ill fv�O • :It n= w..r. ,1 YI ii. Min ~ • ^ �.. .,ro loan r,.. • ^rn ,... rr . 1. r —.i .n. INOCX MAP SI 1 '•n n T'�tli 1' i I • .. ./ • • (yam .1 �1pJ i J i i .I. I.• r J i It to .fair? fYH•'I S VACS w Uav, G' .. •I wl ill fv�O • :It n= w..r. ,1 YI ii. Min ~ • ^ �.. .,ro loan r,.. • ^rn ,... rr . 1. r —.i .n. INOCX MAP I s - : - - - - -- -.._.. - - - -- 2c' TRACT NO. 9397 A ARC', O OS S SMICSS I 141 COD411 01 Sth Sl Ibt10140 • •SSOCItICD S SMGMCOS MM t MU SSICM O IYRII 1 Iq M 01 PUUL IW ,ISS IS tiC%UD IM / KIL IW OMitS10.caw"M. tCO. U p1QS b 40 SI ItCDIDS o SIM Kb Iln (a411 cuumh11 r.r . —I — —• f f MIIUID[ i•• ' '• i SI ' ' � /Yl wur Yl /i!I %%/l�rr I ii1 _ _1 i S I _ _x V, J I It ' J u J Jt I J3 i iM I IS i it JI J JD .t • • 1 1 t, M1i naI` .r L L _ r r to t tt t t, I IM 1 t tJ 1 11 t t/ 1 I, � � — — ""may"- - - 't?r _- _ _ -� - - - "G�_ -- _ __ •i!b . .�\ f',' I I� tr M.vruo ara r r t t IM - - i(err....--- C C•a- --- - -0 -- - --t3 -- - --- �i•/-- — —� -•. . - .�.n— - -� D r r� ro n n u u n n n n n n w w i it i i � I I \ \ I I I a . .r _ t tIMItM trDltr 2c' CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMHGA NgNORAIMM DATEt Deresber 20, 1978 TOt City Council PSQis Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECTS C=Mfr CALMAR TRACT 9324 - Accept roads and release bonds , Located On the south side of Hillside Road between Jas"r Street and CarS.ellan Street Owner: Griffin Development Compaq P. O, BOX 488 Alta Loma, CA 91701 Performance good (Road) $ 268,000.00 (Surety) Performance Bond Water) S 36,000,00 (Surety) WM: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance Will the Road Improvement Plans and It is reran ended that the roads be accepted. The improve - seats include curb and gutter, paving, valls sad street •ipu. Wig-' The sbo'e water bond has been approved for release by the Department of Pmvironnental Health Services. r S r r r �TRACW r "4®. IN TSl r• COUNTY OF SAN HE rtNARDlNO i J.1., . wrnNly p aw. 1 w { v uac. u, ptNV.J I I1 .nY11nr VM IN .4. Y[�.•W .. r✓a p W NW WIW tv..t[. Taw tY 11 W1. ' :1 � wDYlwtn '.l. M..OII • •ner111t{ [wC 5 ' � 11 • I: It . . 5 .,e!rl 1` - ;: ��T:- .'t— .'...' �.'�lt.� �I 1':'::.�r-YJ. �...- }f ::1•:..RS _ ��,•• � t tjj� It i - F Li ! as .t••r o. 'n..f T. � 1.. • / t_`•a�¢ � _•.�l .i •TI;. •' ,,± •t �s CT tj •CS .C.WODNV'GAT �:r:: -•i: .Nr '�..�. 1 (v .Aaa 1.F.•.. rnu 1 ... � �� NM.tp 'r �.a JL •�T.IiL' _ i.}hy �v� II t i. •a 4 •t i, at S tl r,t, },� .c °(•:Z ='.: �� 1 �q•Y Vt- �.P »N .1.r M• •mom gLlA.GA I•L".: L 1. �;r�l i'i'i., Yi• a . �' •r•.e Fsat. ie i -`-LLf .l IN MAP g ♦�P � r..t..t. y ��� �: .°in Vii: 7 i• • i .o r� .'J� p .44 to 4 t a n[ nn•{ .om • • � � F t D '• t } s Nr w w wn a ra ri1mY�.: w r+.•a.•.•' N•.Jr r"en. r • �1� �, S$:.; 5; `� Yfimtp [Y YW WIK [iMtr VIIrVYN. Y ` `✓• J .�1, J ..V . \\ • IKIttTIr ......[Yt JPY 1. a.tn' • J\ x if • Im[laln an r a... [w tln. tYCm. e. e. alai. D . Imnmt nmwn ..pwn. m r ow nn. ♦ • T, je :. r. - .t owls ..ts. una, yr ul.r nne.. N.om tii • N[Cx."D`— 0111V[ —.i tw•[. . I.{ . wyYltt rclu. j• : •— �irl�dT t , w.w .�.l'�1 -yam .n Yu .m uu a to . e C. tp w tuu r.onmw p up Iw • UM a N tltV p IJC.t tG.a4 •� : L 3. 7 1 r•� f • n• n . .. nr•. ° utYm trwa Ylnu wln .m r.wa.. t 1 una ro 1l YY 10r (PYJY. [.t wMPIN Im1UT.D. S} f�t.. . !;w J • a. a Imnn. whim mrx. vn /�'•4. 1 w r ^w f.t • 4 N.. tYfT YAM IR{ J. a .nr. � l PI\ . •o t. 11 4 • N i. : N +IHeI ti MDt..�i•r w_ ........t.. n. t}"' , -• { t tl .•IUIVrt {•.•.n4n r11V Pn .[ {V. p t4�1 .♦ L i' ♦.• '- .r .w. w rlt{ .t.,iWL w r1.t Ylµ Y nVi 1. S6 tlV � F/ ; \. N t J •. µJr - tllli{ w rY rfYTr {W.[lw. 9 w.: "tl0 ..1 t'• ^•N t.r... Imuun tourer lwmr'a .s.wn. • T. Yiil r ° • \T•.� : 1 - r.m.t. [J[VTie tMRr rwtnp'a IIJV q. { J . i ..1. {•+ Nr+ul.r :uem r...l•++ Yur✓I 'it . o [ ww.....w...w..nn• c . 11 � V � �•-'^ � 4 7� i ..yv4�wN,j•yt rrY� uu�aa -rr ar..�,'d`:.g11.�(,'t/ (� .[•) " -.. 'o«, °•4:M Isj �{ Zh?;,)i'i:' i \V• ✓flb Je - :'�•vn• 4 e #7 4 Y >].i g 'ra'•' •• IN` THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ri �~ • run. arlrl,ollw a -M l lw ♦ So r.r♦ n, atu•ru p.i� "�, Yr.m.r ur¢uala Iwnr w w IOi♦ a nn• Go r .. f.0 u. ♦ate•D{ v w r+•rlr aw•rn. a rwranu. � d .• r _ A ♦•tl ♦ alaOrlall{ IMC ' YtWlYalr 1•Ir D i N6 ; 9080 LA31� AG'T' CAC) '75ZC) Z izs; ra- {f !it R tiiiw}•• i 1e9 13F It, ROAD Ron ..` .ow•... .V l'e:� hfy \,. ••tn .tn H.•.• !a ••e W.••n• -i`I1 Mr A 11 1 jE .. �y «``,i, �,_•i�a I �:�� •y • � n 'pit• oe ta {' „v.a.. • .la,•..a y ''- a,`�+` •:a ` J ;w .yr..ui n.• •t v yL • Iha• ?” ,p % S•, a j ra t -- sx*— .1�1L'L � '< e•� pat l �\ .r�r : �\ 'a I� ._ •. I ••�i''��r •ta'''d +t�� •. to it'r•' a cawy(� D.f•..o = .sl•a.. nrr ' J °r } \'`. •ar `�. • t a�`a�.•�Z 1)q:ic'..f itlr•uT At f .t Z1 °,:a"' ��• \ a'lt so 81 it go A w •. • U r 1 t G•!Sn,t •• n `• ,,s f �, ' -'�e lat ": � a � ' •at • ~ •: } C�tt .11 0• . '•, I•.M frftr S 3 IA.- re �•�� U r,r. •1 !'dew.: •1',, la QIa4 % tk so VIC Cl 46 47 w i ata Pi.a i lap __ v I il• Ir:h� .I: )l).' wVi�v�'•l�y� � tiii."tr #t� t = r^n.astie_ • mn °" •. '� i's) 1.4; _anuLr�e ORfiM•ppp •x••" DVK �?�L�l:{nl� t 1.t ' Mrvt t is F I a) F tl 1 to ; 1 • J \ •4 ,- 12 x , E E t• i ' ` I • Y•M,R• ••w l� .il • {Ii Cr•. 74 w••W� 1w• . Il: at�V L• II • q. P S IT— cw�i 6 i.�L. .::.L I" t, � m' 'ji��r; ��i'i.kiPi'` �+�: _��„�, -Y;y li.- nx�.'.a ,. •> � `. `+WMytlj �YSw. J/� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA J MEMORANDUM .T P DATE: December 20, 1978 TO: City Council _ FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer i SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR ' TRACT 9352 - Accept roade and release bond, located at the Southwest corner of 19th and Bermooa Owner: Into Romea 700 .ouch Harbor Boulevard Fullerton, California 92632 . Porformaoce Bond (Road) $144,000.00 Performance Bond (Water) $ 53,000.00 Performance Bond (Sewer) $ 37.000.00 NOTE: The road construction, water bystem and sanitary sewer systems have been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans alit approved by the Cucamonga County Water District. The improvments Include curb and _ gutter, paving, sidewalks, wells, street sigrz, pipes, vales, manholes and various other appurtenances. ;a? V .r i Pltl 2 or 2 1.2113 TRACT NQ.9352 .IICL,.If.1.L1 +11.1 1+ .1 00+1, of s.. 11101"ct+o frruq.o.uao ■IV.. %(LIAt10.7 YJ q.n V I DI I I M 1 RU I. I1�AKK r�./ SRtl aYt i.IOw P ""JI) 1. by f a .>d 1.N 1(IMI, a S.19 1,M %I.11 O to UJ.O YI LS Mhi ROUTE JOI I- - - -/`� - ��'_.. -_.. -0 4 _ji �•^ ;; E NRIE TEE NDi'•'a STREET" TREEl r. GS ��_ ( --�• Ip �Y 21 �j 22 �. 23 Q ll 34 Y 35 +} ,I .j V7 �1�•d. -tt 11 yT 20 24 1 33 �T�. w�r J7 { u ­7 '25 • S • 1 I ' ; • _-fa/Z S v � =L : I'".. _ •— . " I� 1 3F j { !I } 1 > ' ,F : I 4 J � i i ti—IS w �:�rr ri • dI-tts__— I r .�} 7 1�{ I I . ¢m• , - 1 p T I ; � - �. +d r s25 ,^r+ L L 1T I L j 1 7I:!f.2 � _I � • r .a� �n�J 7I'• > ; ^ uA. r� 13 26 ; � �t9 R� L _• / :40 17 2 JO 14 i 2 48 1 V � 1 } S j t L Lt .p L' a 4WNONE tiE v '° ^n `° STREET `S 3 ^_ ! 2 ,2 7 1 _ )• i 1 'A 1qy 4`J 4i 48 (,31 47 '! 46 # 43 tt 44 43 42 !.. . _ .w .....+. ter. r..r ✓ . w ..w. p1 v . .� �• •.......nr.w .. wr. •u w. L •rT ~(.�• cry...• 0 0 CITY OF RANC11O CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: D.cember 20, 1978 TO: City Council PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineoro SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9475 — Accept roads and releaso bonds Located at the Northeast corner of Haven and Lemon Owner: J. Anthony Development 10889 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1030 Ins Angeles, California 90024 Performance Bond (Road) $82,000 (Surety) Note: The road construction has been approved as being In accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it Is recommended that the roads be accepted The improvements Include curb and gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs. l i Fs Cl/4V dOYfl ABL (� TRACT NO. 91175 ixtlT t 01 t IRI \TI f •IIOCIAltR IYCIN1111 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO• CALIFORNIA DNruro. uLNa1NA MIND A 3WONV4" N A FOATAIN Of LOT ST AND THE NORINCRLY S•I TNNTI Two FEET K LE40N AVENUE IVACATED1. AS PLR RAT Of «/..8 FOOTHILL INgRTLESS rRIRT C" TRACT NO I. AS RECORDED IN BOOR S' N)• NAOE U? RECORDS Li SAY SERNARpxO COUNTI. STATE O< GLIDNINUI, B f:S d Cl/4V dOYfl ABL (� n I �� f i•1.: •� /4 »19 ;i p /4 »� a S•I .,12 «/..8 S' v»m• B f:S d SCIl -Y•cO' t tc! K OIL i — @= _e!1 _ Kix? P U. R O• �, ,C • a/ 7 R y g w./ , t 16 21 a It 15 14 .Y 1 i22 E/`/+y. 1 mit -.,.c© .'�.. S64„Tr i`c.I° • ° a- y- 'uxnxo� �aiecET y , g 5 '� / I R • 4 c t R 23 H•S� ice. 4 tc t 2 t Alp y 3 i 1 24 �• 25 26 27 23 Ir ✓.. •, 34•, t 33 , 32 R 31 30 L 28 ;i Z1 \ i' yE e' EI ;� F ✓' P v „iI � � b� •m an a`cb -R -m, I <"''` _aI of m ID (: ,,tr I� -1� / ..... .. ./r`.../� we /... �Z. �f/�•/.M1 .er LE -OR IL .j �, \`�• \ ,A,•rp +/url.. rw G...LV N..+✓. A./.w l.•:.wrNlfR i- l /iw•.R.•r��A liV' E t Au -u. A.y io»or/ -�— • /.✓.... w.a.. to.•LrM 1 OI. ✓ .'/./)L7,,` ll. 7 L•/r "f �lALV r, ✓✓!N .•I'.••^•. +.� /+•.a• v"w "'�I ILi' +' • - /+•✓. w.w✓•/ri• •.. •-.n. ✓a... ar ....... Cs// ).. ..0 fr�Y.•r. /r ✓4e .+.Y.Y�ri r..- ri »•.- r,•..... nw..� -.M.. [aiw-A. ®, ^..r/.•..� Jnc r'.rlw ... •e..+. l4l. .a✓ t✓..I ... .. . .. .... , .r•_ 1_S �� 1 I }Ir •s• « ,' .nrr — n I ;4b •.•.• I i•1.: •� /4 »19 ;i p /4 »� a S•I .,12 «/..8 I'i I I i ee is 4» II bt 20 a L < L I/rr 17 /4» 12 <T 1 y t•7 U. R O• �, ,C • a/ 7 R y g w./ , t 16 21 a It 15 14 .Y 1 i22 E/`/+y. 1 mit -.,.c© .'�.. S64„Tr i`c.I° • ° a- y- 'uxnxo� �aiecET y , g 5 '� / I R • 4 c t R 23 H•S� ice. 4 tc t 2 t Alp y 3 i 1 24 �• 25 26 27 23 Ir ✓.. •, 34•, t 33 , 32 R 31 30 L 28 ;i Z1 \ i' yE e' EI ;� F ✓' P v „iI � � b� •m an a`cb -R -m, I <"''` _aI of m ID (: ,,tr I� -1� / ..... .. ./r`.../� we /... �Z. �f/�•/.M1 .er LE -OR IL .j �, \`�• \ ,A,•rp +/url.. rw G...LV N..+✓. A./.w l.•:.wrNlfR i- l /iw•.R.•r��A liV' E t Au -u. A.y io»or/ -�— • /.✓.... w.a.. to.•LrM 1 OI. ✓ .'/./)L7,,` ll. 7 L•/r "f �lALV r, ✓✓!N .•I'.••^•. +.� /+•.a• v"w "'�I ILi' +' • - /+•✓. w.w✓•/ri• •.. •-.n. ✓a... ar ....... Cs// ).. ..0 fr�Y.•r. /r ✓4e .+.Y.Y�ri r..- ri »•.- r,•..... nw..� -.M.. [aiw-A. ®, ^..r/.•..� Jnc r'.rlw ... •e..+. l4l. .a✓ t✓..I ... .. . .. .... , .r•_ 1_S �� 1 I 0 f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM I DATE: December 20, 1978 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR Minor Subdivision No 76 -0642 Release Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the amount of $6,000.00 from Douglas Nelson, securities posted by the Bank of America, 293 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. Owner: Douglas Nelson 6510 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA Location: Highland Avenue, vest of Archibald Note: The road construction has been ,pproved as being In accordance with the road Improvement plans and It is therefore recommended that the Instrument of Credit be released. Respectfully submitted, CV L1 d Hubbe` City Engineer L1i:JLM:dab Par. Gucamonga Ho &stead Association _ M B. 6/46 1062 57 I a O - fp O D @ 26 519AC Y/L y 5.30AC un 26 AC 2.50 AC •« LCA 71 C n O pDJ Ac y 0 1A6 Parcel Map No 1805, P M. 16/91 Pon. Foothill Frostless Fruit Co Sub Na 2 MB. 20/34 por. Foothill Irrigation Co. Sub. Troot No, 9051 M.a 22/36 Note -Asso Numbers Par 1 15.62 AC F CE -3 -19th (OLIVE), --T — ^ I I I r 1- I' Parcel Map No 1805, P M. 16/91 Pon. Foothill Frostless Fruit Co Sub Na 2 MB. 20/34 por. Foothill Irrigation Co. Sub. Troot No, 9051 M.a 22/36 Note -Asso Numbers • o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 1978 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSLNT CALENDAR Plot Plan 96 -70 Release of Instrument of Credit and Agreement In the amount of $15,000.00 Located on the vest side of Archibald, north of Baseline Owner: Stevens Foothill Rental 1690 Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 NOTE: Jack Stevens has satisfactorily constructed road and drainage facilities In accordance with the improvement plans and it to recomended that the Instrument of Credit and Agreement be released. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer LU:deb �i Alto Loma Tax Code AS 5208 15 '" 0T Assessor's Mcp Note- Assessors Blk.8 Lot Book 202 Page 14 Numbers Shown In Circles. Son Bernardino County 1 1 C I J/16/67 I1z•.o•se t.e e 25 i a. I 16 3 I: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATES December 20, 1978 TOs City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubba, City Englneert� SUBJECTS CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9348 — Release cash staking deposit of $2,250.00 3 Location: lying seat of Turner Avenue and south of Baseline Subdivider: Rent land Company 18902 Bardeen Way _ Irvine, California 92715 NOTE: Certificate From H. W. Finley, Surveyor, states that all final monuments have been set and he has been paid t in full. i H/ GALE 1 %60' • TRACT �a .�. 9 348 SHEET 3 OF .3 SHEETS IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA "MIT A flllOms" Of P"f iow$ Of LOTS S AMC, A IM SCCTIO I f TOMMfMV 1 SWIM M /MCC T MIT SODOM W N MOIIOA LANDS AS SMOMM CM ILA, MCMCEO IM 8001 A PAGE 8 Of MYS MI TNC OffICC Of iME COOMTT RECORDED Of CAN MIMMAMUMIO COUMtT r.r <f•P' •• a fC i •bm ii ,,S t: •.rr r• .•r. .r •r.r .e•L 14 • w ....N i ..f� f L i • • } T/ • • i i • .. r • ••a•Ir• bar / A. rn A• j 0£TA /L• MAP �a I i it f I r .. I » is ?.5 W 'r '�! ¢• MSG^ 1 d �r •'� CS f• 1!rf! - i•SMAOMOL /II a>rrn,__ I. Q f <i(1... 1 ills i ��I. Ea•��Cx �::7�'�: �'{Y i �, 0 2p � �' .I !r i`^ it /E - e /�• t i /6 =1 L -= i �I lji2• 1 �� f b ++ t — ., i /i i l sue• ° 30 , e i -= •, i 3.tl9y�>•�; 9 + /0 /2� -: _ ti 1._�.arI •na>ari..lrr��'.; 'aA it • :v Ali 39 ie 30 �' 37 1336 ¢.:ii;�: le 35 tht JS t= 33 t4 32 :. iV.li rll. fig ORDINANCE NO. 40 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS 229 - 151 -14 and 150 and 229 - 161 -01 thrc:gh 07 ,L' /( FOLLOWS- THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ODES ORDAIN AS fol low g: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the a That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga following a public hearing held in the time and manner pre- scribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described and this City Council has held i public hearing In the time and manner perscribed by law and has duly heard and donaidored said recommendation b That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed c. That this rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the negative declaration filed herein. Section 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly C -2 (general commercial) and M -R (restricted manufacturing) to N -2 (heavy manufacturing). Said property is located an the northeast corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Nhittram known as Assessor's Parcel Noe 229 - 151 -14 and 15, and 229 - 171 -01 through 07. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 11:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ jay of December 1978. FAW94 -c City Clerk Mayor 6- ( C B'h�`"'•tlni� -•P il�'^3'J+.t,st :. {:•r e14.• •I:� i7. ".i 4 i� {� 1'. (' )1 T'•�. —. •. ._. ., r� jr•.. ' ORDINANCE 110. 1.2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORANTINO TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PUR- POSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, NAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 33. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1: Whenever in this Ordinance the woras or phrases hereinafter in this section defined are used, it is Intended that they shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the following definitions (unless, in the given instance, the context wherein they are used shall clearly import a different meaning): (a) The word "grantee" shall mean the corpo- ration to which the franchise contemplated in this Ordinance is granted and its lawful successors or assigns; (b) The word "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corioration of the State of California, in its present incorporated form or in any later reorganized, consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form; (c) The word "streets" shall mean the public streets, ways, alleys and places as the same now or may hereafter exist within said City; (d) The phrase "poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances" shall mean poles, towers, supports wires, conductors, cables, guys, stubs, platforms, crossarms, braces, transferme *s, insulators, con- duits, ducts, vaults, manholes, meters, cut -outs, switches, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, appurtenances and any other property over or under the streets of said City, and used M i, r . i w - a� -. ..Irectly or Indirectly, for the purpose of transmitting or distributing electricity; (e) The phrase "construct and use" shall mean to lay, construct, erect, Install, operate, maintain, use, repair, replace or relocate. Section 2: The franchise to use and to construct and use, for transmitting and distributing electricity for any and all purposes, poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances, including communication circuits, necessary or proper therefor, In, along, across, upon, over and under the streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is hereby granted to Southern California Edison Company, its lawful successors and assigns, under and in accordance with the provisions of the Franchise Act of 1937. Section 3: Said franchise shall be Indeterminate, that is to say, sa d franchise shall endure in full force and effect until, with the consent of the Public Utilities Commis- slon of the State of California, the same shall be voluntarily surrendered or abandoned by the grantee, or until the State or some municipal or public corporation thereunto duly authorized by law shall purchase by voluntary agreement or shall condemn and take under the power of eminent domain, all property actu- ally used and useful in the exercise of Bald franchise and situate within the territorial limits of the state, municipal or public corporation purchasing or condemning such property, or until said franchise shall be forfeited for noncompliance with Its terms by the grantee. the life tSere�i opn 4: The grantee of said franchise, during of the gross annual receiptsyof saiddgranteewarisingnfrom%thefuse, operation or possession of said franchise; provided, however, that such payment shall In no event be less than one porcent (1:) of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the sale or electricity within the limits of said City. or said Cl teotion : The grantee shall file with the City Clerk the ralendar, w t n three (3) months after the expiration of date of the year, or fractional calendar year, following the months aftergthetexpirationsofreachicalendarwithin three ter a verified statement showing In detail the totalr thereafter, gro of said grartee derived during the preceding Cale dass receipts r ear such fractional calendar year, from the sale of electricity or within City within lfifteen f (15)d days yafteretheatime fort filingtsaidld statement, in lawful money of the United States, the aforesald -2- k� percentage of its gross receipts for the calendar year, or fractional calendar year, covered by said statement. Any neglect, omission or refusal by said grantee to file said verified statement, or to pay tald percentage at the tlxs or In the manner here(nbefore prodded stall constitute grounds for the declaration of a forfeiture of this franchise and of all rights of 7antee hereunder. Section 6: This Ordinance shall tecome effective thirty (30) days after its final passage, unless suspended by referendum petition filed as provided by law aeticr 7: The ttrantee of this franchise shall pay to the City a sue or money sufficient to reimburse it for all publication ezpensas incurred by it in connection with the 9raating this francciire; said payment to be made wit..'t thirty (30) days after the City shall have furnished said grantee with a written statement of such expenses. Section 8: The franchise grauted hereby shall not beccce effec tive until written acceptance thereof shall have ueen filel by the Frantee with the City Clerk of said City. section 9: The City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be posted within fifteen (15) d.,ys after its passage in three (3) public places within said City. Section .o: The grantee shall remove or relocate wi[bmut expense to the City any facilities installed, used or maintained under this franchise by the grantee if and wher. made necessary by any lawful ctanee of grade, alIVUZe -nt, or width of a..y public street cr viaduct by Me City. Sectloo 11: (ace bottm of page). First read at a regular meeting of the City Council of 331d City held on the day of and finally adopted and ordered posted at a regu r meeting of the City Council held on the day of by the following vote. Secclao 11: ordisonoe no. 33 of cbe City Coox11 of the City of raocbo c�ga is bereby re` algid. i f -4- ■; AYES, CC=clLwn: 9E!: Co•.wellnen: AB° : Coa7ellmm-= 't Arm=. -:St7 uie (zeal) Mayor. Clt7 of Rancho Cucamonga TO: FROM: CITY OF 1TANCHC CI'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUDJECT: LONE C1W;CE 110. 78 -03 - UALT SEICL - The change of zone from R -1 to AP on 4 2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street The Planning Commission, at its meeting of November :2. 1978, held a public hearing to consider the above zone change and recommended approval by the City Council as indicated on the attached resolution. Hr. Sfegl in requesting a change of soap from R -1 (Single family resida�tial) to AP (Administrative Professional) on the above described property (Exhibit 'A'). lie would like to develip a professional office complex A conceptual site plan has been sub- - witted (Exhibit '8'). It should be noted, this plan is for illustrative pur- poses only and will be given detailed review at the Site Approval stage. The proposed General Plan designates this site as Mixed Use. The site is presently vacant aml zoned R -1. Surrounding land use and zoning in as follows: The zone change is consistent with the proposed General Plan and the site is suitable In size and shape to accommodate the uses permitted in the zone re- quested. Further. uses permitted in the AP zone would be compatible to the existing and future land uses on adjacent properties. No significant adverse environmental impa_ts are envisioned as a result of this Project. The Planning Commission, thus, issued a Negative Declaration at their meeting of November 22, 1978. A notice of public hearing was published in the Cucamonga Times on December 7, 1978. In addition, a notice of said hearing was called to property owners within 300' of the subject property. One lette- of opposition was submitted by Mrs. Laurel Hawker, an adjacent property owner (see attached letter). WN WMA Land Use Zoning North Single family residential R -1 South Single :roily residential A -1 -5 East Vacant R -1 -8500 West Vacant R -1 The zone change is consistent with the proposed General Plan and the site is suitable In size and shape to accommodate the uses permitted in the zone re- quested. Further. uses permitted in the AP zone would be compatible to the existing and future land uses on adjacent properties. No significant adverse environmental impa_ts are envisioned as a result of this Project. The Planning Commission, thus, issued a Negative Declaration at their meeting of November 22, 1978. A notice of public hearing was published in the Cucamonga Times on December 7, 1978. In addition, a notice of said hearing was called to property owners within 300' of the subject property. One lette- of opposition was submitted by Mrs. Laurel Hawker, an adjacent property owner (see attached letter). WN WMA RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reco=eods adoption of Ordinance No. approving Zone Change No. 78 -03 R spectful`y submitted, 1 r, COM?=ITT DEVELOPMENT JL=BNMtem City Council Ordinance Attachment %: Planning Commission Resolution No. 78 -32 Exhibit 'A' - Location map Exhibit 'B' - Conceptual site plan Letter from }ire. Laurel Nmukor Minutes of November 22 Planning Commission meeting L1q • 0 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO 202 - 191 -13 FROM R -1 TO AP GENERALLY LOCATED ON MIR NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH ST AND HERMOSA AVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN IS FOLLONSt SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: a. That the Planning Comisb on of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a poblic hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and has duly heard and considered - sold recommendation b That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed. C. That thin rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby mended accordingly. R -1 (single fmlly residential) to AP (administrative professional) Said property 1s located on the northeast corner of 19th St. and Hermosa Ave. known am Assessor Parcel No. 202 - 191 -13. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 313t day after its adoption. PASSED, APPROV0 AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ,1978. Mayor Rancho Cuceonga ATTEST: ./ V a i RESOLUTI0N NO. 78 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE ADOPTION OF 7.ONE CIIANGE NO. 78 -03 TO ORDINANCE NO. 17 By CHANGING THE 2011E FROM R -I TO AP FOR 4.2 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NERVOSA AVENUE AND 19 STREET - ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 202 - 191 -13. WHEREAS, on the 29th day of October, 1978, a Complete application was filed for review on the above described property; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of November, 1978, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project. NJW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the provesed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with ezistfug and future land use in the surrounding area; and 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant Impact on the environment nor the surrounding pro- perties; and 3. That there is reasonable probability that the land use proposed will be consistent with the general plan pro- posal being considered 4. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general pinn if the use proposed is ultimately in- codsiatent with the general plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not Ctcate significant adverse Impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued on November 22, 1978 ��7 a APPROVED ANII ADOPTED THIS 22110 DAY OF NOVEma .R, 1978 PLANNING coiairSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA By. Herman Rempel, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Cosroisslon 1. , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do herehy certify that the foregoing resolution wan duly and regularly introdnccd, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission held on the day of _ 1978, by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COHHISSIONERS: J � EyM%%T A yI R -I (VACANT) - (VACANT) I°a R -1 TO A-P mi, ( S.f.A - -T Rot C-r, R-1 m 0 d u Y ZONING MAP ZC 78 -03 SIEGL ,.rw- irk;- ;•-•y .. -. -_. _ . :,...�. -F, - - - ;' -� - -: - =. - =a, Z, aH�1 :OWy�frl�aOH�NyN d 1 1� bb __ c, I'-IIII'' k , �S 1 tlllll 111 I ! lit�= e S - CI_ A0 , lr _ ti 2, BM W anv vsararn� I- • k {,L•IVEC cily CQNMaNRI DEVEDEM11111 D"P ., NOV 2115• 9r. 7 8t81�t1111i11t`ZN3111516 Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga Poet office Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga California 91730 Dear Biro: L Laurel Hawker 6655 Hermosa Avenue Alta Loma California 91701 November 18, 1978. E Pursuant to a considered zone change on 4.2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Nineteeth Street from R -1 to A -P, Zone Change Ho. 78 -03, I am strongly opposed to such a zone change. As soon as commercialism is allowed with Ito bleak areas of blekk -top and cement, tawdry ehope cluster around U20 periphery, and the last of the rµ 1 peace and beauty is gone. We owned this land for seventy -five years , and when I, with many Intoreated buyers, attempted to cell it, I could not, because of a moratorium placed on it duo to a lack of water and sewerage facilities. When was this moratoria removed? And why? i;.s ' Yours vgry tjru }yi_ ■ H Chairman Rtmpet stated he would ISY.e to review the Consent Calendar Items at , this time. CONSENT CALENDAR Commissioner Garcia stated Ito has some questions regarding Item ll on the Consent Calendar - Negative Declaration for Parcel Nap No. 4749, and esked that It be removed at this time There being no discussion on It cm C of the Consent Calendar - Negative Declaration for Parcel flap He. 4767 - a motion was code by Commissioner Carats, seconded by Commissioner Jones and unanimously carried to approve the Negative Declaration s is s A s PUBLIC HEARING ZONE CHANCE NO. 78 -07 - MALT SiEfl. - Request to change the zone from R -1 to A -P for property located on the northeast corner of Normans and 19th Street Bill Ilofman, Planning Assistant, reviewed the staff report in detail Ile reported this zone change is consistent with rise proposed Central Plan and the nice Ir suitable Im aze and shape to accommodate the uses permitted in the tone requested The use of this land as a professional office complex would be cam tittle to the existing and future find uses on adjacent properties Il, reported a notice of public hearing was published In the Cucamonga Timcs and one letter in opposition to the zone change was recieved from Nrs. Laura Hawker Copies of tills letter have been distributed to the Commisatun The Planning Division recommends adoption of Resolution Ion 77 -11 recommending approval of the zone change from R -1 to A -P and forward it to the City Council. At t61s time, Chairman Remprl nod C^ssissloner Garcia Atated they hnve employment with Parisian, Ilorgan and Causey and will nbstain from partfef ?sting on this item Commissioner Tolstoy was appointed as Acting Chairman for this review. Acting Chairman Tolatoy opened the public hearing tie. Jim Oillim, Architect with HarniRb. Morgan and Cnuscy, stated he has brought a rendering of the proposed project. lie understands this will be reviewed under site apptwalhowever, he brought the plan along at this time to- Informational purposes. lie stated the zoning in compatible with the proposed master plan. He feels the pn,ject they are proposing. will tic an lAset to the community and provide needed medical office space Commissioner !noes naked If It will he necessary to widen the street in that particular area. Lloyd Hobbs stated that street widening to ultimate width would be a condition of approval nt the time of Director Review. however, further review of the drainage problems may rn•quirc alternatives other than full improvement Nr. Gllltm stated he will he eery happy to work with staff to solve any problems s-t� -1- Jack Meaty, who lives en 19th Street lint fvay between Permosa and Ifavan, stated he is In favor of the zone clunge. Mr. Walt Siegl, applicant, stated they believe that the project that is planned for this location would be a definite asset for the coesunity. Mr. Clean Foster, property owner to the north of this zone change, stated lie owns 7 1/2 acres on the north boundary of the sits and they have a horse + ianch there now. He stated they plan to contimte this horse ranch, and possibly expand in the future. Their previous inquiries with tine County crier to the City incorporating indicated that it would be possible for then to get a condi- tional use penit in order to moderately expand their horse ranch. He stated he would like to ank Hr. Siegl _f he fecie tits horse ranch would be In conflict with his proposal? He has talked to as: -ral people in the area and there has been no strong feelinps expressed the way or the other. Mr. Siegl stated they ace proposing to develop acdttal offlee buildings and possibly a wall clinic. Ile stated if the use of the adjacent property does not cause any air pollutis n and does not violate city ordinances or standards, he has no objections. Mr. Art Bridge stated ho is not concerned about this project; however, be would like to lnov wiry Hrs. Laura Hawker objects to this development. Her objections shwld be known by tiro audience. The Director read firs. Pavker's letter for the audience (letter on file In the Planning Office). After general dlecussion, a motion was made by Co®iaatouer Dahl, seconded by Cosnisslaner Jones to adopt Resolution No. 78 -72 based on the findings as listed. It was further recotaarnded that this recetacendstfon be forwarded to the city Council. AYES: DAHL, JONES, TOISTOY NOES: ROUE ABSTAIN: CARCIA, HEMPEL AESENr: Nlf1E 11011011 CARRIED e a a A At this t1ao, Chalrmnn Rcmpel asked that the Old Business Item he reviewed. OLD BUSINESS Access Police for Major and Secondary Nletltvays - Initiated by Rancho Cucamonga Planning Coe_isslon Lloyd Hubbs, City :ngincer, reviewed the staff report In detail. Me reported the access policy has been revised to reflect the various concerns of all Interested people. The rotor change reduced the recoaumended frontage control ' '1 from 600 foot of frontage to 7J0 feet raeagntzing that the Intent is to obtain �^/ •y +,r s 700 foot syaelnF of driveways. Further chmuges authorize the Catmaunity / J ;'• Developr nt Director to issue deviations to the policy with appeals to the .�iS.M.ij ^.�� •���T,..��".1 S •lfrll \lr try 11 E M 0 o A N D U M •.e- DATE: December 15, 1978 70. City nd Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: Mobile Home Rent Review Issue At Council's direction, staff notified all park owners (see attached\ letter) that select members of the Council were willing to meet and \I\ discuss with owners, the concerns of mobile home park tenants and possible alternatives to a Mobile Hare Rent Review Commission. To date staff has received responses from only two park owners. In staff's / JHR:lk a yomse$ FRa" !� A141h VfS' b c Z' �w'ttilf/ M�61lL *AlAv r- #, f' �'ASh ✓allk/Tl: 5' ifs yuCA4Uf.A W4 u �1 r City 0f R ANCHO CUCAMONGA December 11, 1978 Mr. William M. Semain Mr. Phillip T. Semain Alta Vista Mobile }come Park 1032 W. coolridge Drive San Gabriel, California 91775 Gentlemens At its meeting of Uecembsr L, 1978, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council reviewed a request and heard testimony from the majority of residents from five of the Rancho Cucamonga Mobile Home Parks requesting the establishment of a Mobile Rome Rent Review Board. This request is prompted by recent notices of impending rent increases in a number of the City's mobile home parks. Essentially the tenants are not objecting to rent increases but feel that rent increases should be based on supported facts and justifiable amounts. Tenants are quite adamant that owners appear to be "unwilling to discuss and docmaent rent increases.* Council has studied the issue of Mobile Home Rent Review Boards and is not convinced this is the most viable approach at this time. However, the Council is considering the establishment of an Advisory Rent Review Committee. Such a committee would - consist of park owners, tenants and citizens selected at large to hear petitions from tenants or landlords and to make recom- mendations to the City Council. Before formation of suca a committee, Council has requested staff to invite all owners of the mobile home parks to meet and to discuss the establishment of a Rent Review Committee. Council would like to meet with the majority of the owners before their next scheduled meeting of December ?0, 1978. Would you please contact the City Manager's off. -e at (714) 989 -1851, and we will arrange a meeting time. While we recognize that owners of Mobile Home Parks are entitled to reasonable profits from their substantial investments, it appears that our primary problem is one of lack of communication. POST OFFICE BOX 791. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 " (714) 999.1951 9 nr. remain Ah Alta Vista MobWb Home Park • Page 2 December 111 1978 lopefully that problem can be resolved by a meeting between the Ility and park owners. We would like to avoid the creation of Any type of rent control if at all possible. Your prompt response will be appreciated. Sincerely, City Manager LMW:lk cc: City Council / Q Y��rr�yytt..ry�_ RESOLUTION NO 78 -69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN 711E FINDINGS OF THE ETINAHDA SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONDITIONS OF OVERCROWDING r EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT. wNEREAS, the governing boatd of the Ettvanda School District of San Bernardino County, California, at its regular meeting on November 18, 1978 adopted a motiGn entitled "Declaration of Impaction" wherein said governing board found and declared that conditions of overcrowding existed in said school district, and WHEREAS, the governing board of the Ettvanda School District has notified the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as required by Government Code Section 65971; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does resolve, determine and order as follows: The City Council concurs in the findings of the governing board of the Ettvanda School District which findings are contained in the aforesaid 'Declaration of Impaction" for all attendance areas within the Etivanda School District PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of December, 1978. by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor U/1 N 4 X11 1� 1 r.Y [reY uoXT ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT a I.W r.�,;;. sr.I aolAo or EOOCATIOM CITY ilf rr,rL. J CUCAMONGA Post OrrIC[ 404 i.L J L YC 1111hCM /,li /: INDIA. +IIL.q ETIWANDA ULIF 00 NIA pup Yr,W Y 1106[111 (�) 1978 T[+[OX OhL LYY 1:01 It, & ,a Ctrl Yl l \• tlwr/ DEC 1 Aoetmr L AVDOL• IA) FM tl .a n.r•..Yr. gj3lt�Ip1U1L111213i41SIG . 6 ,LAA, .A[DLAD DECLARATION OF IMPACTION N•.N. 6.A, . C"L1.s Pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and Ordinance 3u, Section 4 of the City o: Rancho Cucamonga, the Board of Trustees of the Etiwanda School District submits to the City Council this Notification of Condition of overcrowding. The decision to file this Notification of Condition of Overcrowding is based on the following inforemtloni 1. All urohle classroom apace is now occupied We have three classes operating In non classroom areas 2. Even though we can absorb a few more youngsters into classrooms already existing, any growth will create double sessions 3. Thera are three hundred eighty six homes on the Preliminary List of Rancho Cucamonga's Tract Status List 4 There arc five hundred fifty homes on the Tentative Approved Lisc of the City of Fontana. Although out of the Jurisdiction of Rancho Cucamonga, these homes will Impact our schools S Although we can absorb approximatoly one hundred students to existing classrooms, if we watt any longer to request impaction help through Ordir nco 30, Section 4 of the City Rancho Cucamonga, we will be overcrowded from new house development and will be receiving no compensating financial assistance. 6. Because of our ability to absorb a few students but no way to house children from motor housing developments, we would ask the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to Invoke the intent of "Conditions of Overcrowding" as presented In your Ordinance 30, Section 3 (e). Because of overcrowded conditions which the new housing developments will create, the educational programs In this district will be impaired to a significant degree The Etiwanda School District in the past has maintained a cumulative building fund Lo provide for classroom apace as it is needed. This in no longer possible. Ile have no bonds to sell, and so consequently, no state loan money avallalbe it it were possible to obtain We simply have no means by which to obtain any funds to be used for classroom development. There are currently no agreements between the Etiwanda School District and any residential developer in which temporary buildings will be leased to the school district for classroom use. 0 r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL AND CITY MANAGER FROM: JACK LAN, DIRECTOR OF COICRINI'tY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: REQUEST BY THE VANIR DEVELOPHENT COHPANY TO MODIFY THE T STANDARDS ON PROPERIY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH ST AND A`MMFYST AVE. BACKGROUND: At the December 6 meeting of the City Council, Vanir Development proposed a list of uses for the above mentioned site development. It was the concurrence of City Council that this list be referred to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. Two questions were posed to the Planning Commission: 1) Should the structure be restricted to allow only a portion of retail commercial uses; and, 2) Is the list of allowable Retail Uses, per the draft Covenant of Restrictions, adequate from the standpoint of the Planning Commission's concerd.' Attached please find the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for the site in question. The developer is now proposing 15 possible uses for the site. After lengthy discussion and debate with the developer, the Commission moved that the allowable list be reduced; specifically eliminating :terns 01, 03, 06 and 015. The developer was in concurrence with the elimination of Items 01, 03 and 06; however, had concern with the elimination of Item 015 Ile indicated that If an additional Item were to be eliminated, he would perfer Itm 014 rather than Itm 015 Regarding the question = restriction of retail commercial uses, the Commission determined that no more than 50% of the structure should be in retoll commercial uses. RECCHHENDATION: The Planning Commission recotmende City Council limit the amount of rgtail commercial uses to a maximum of 50% of tLe structure and, secondly, eliminate from the list of approved uses as presented in Exhibit 'B', Items 01, 03, 06 and 015. The Advisory Committees concur with the Planning Commission's recommendation; however, the applicant does not. Therefore, the applicant can be expected to argue against this recommendation. + Respectfully submitted, JACK IAN, DIRECTOR 0' COM NITY DEVELOPI'VT JL: BKI1: m ) Attachments: Declaration of Restrictive Covenanta Y'..') DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, 11. FRANK DOMINGUEZ is the owner of that certain real property known as Parcel 2 of Parcel Map Number 1805, as per plat recorded in Book 16 of Parcel Maps, Page 91, records of said county, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, which property will be developed into a commercial center; and WHEREAS, said owner desires to establish a general plan for development of said center for commercial purposes which will bind and inure to the benefit of the owners, heirs, successors and assigns of said center or portions thereof, present and future; and WHEREAS, the developer, H. FRANK DOMINGUEZ, desires to establish certain restrictions that will narrow the scope c.f the existing C -1 class zoning classification for the benefit of this parcel and the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and further that said City shall have the power to enforce any and all restrictions set forth herein. HOW, THEREFORE, declarant declares that said real property shall be held, transferred, encumbered, used, sold, conveyed, leased, and occupied, subject to the covenants and restrictions hereinafter set forth expressly and exclusively for the use and benefit of said property and of each and every person or entity who now or in the future owns any portion or portions of said real property. A. COMMERCIAL AREA COVENANTS 1 Reference is hereby made to Exhibit "A ", attached hereto, which is the land use and building regulations prescribing l�J the uses permitted in a C -1 district. All uses provided for in said -1- �• ■ ■ 0 0 Exhibit "A" shall be prohibited with the exception of those uses allowed under current A -P zoning classification and those specified in Exhibit "B ". 2. No noxious or offensive trade shall be carried on upon any portion of said tract nor shall anything be done thereon which may 6e or become an unreasonable annoyance or nuisance to the { rest of the tract. 3. Any uses, including those specifically prohibited above, that the owner may, in the future, wish to allow on said premises shall be subject to the approval of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Depart- , went or Developrnnt Director. And said uses, if s3 approved, shall be - deemed to be consistent with and in harmony with the Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions contained herein. i B. GENERAL PROVISIONS t 1. It is understood and agreed that every conveyance of said property is and shall hereafter be made, accepted and said real 1 i ptoperty is and shall hereinafter be granted only upon and subject to i the express conditions, provisions, restrictions and covenants, hrre'n referred to and shall bind the parties hereto and their heirs, devisees legatees, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. t. 2. These covenants, conditions and restrictions shall 3 be a covenant running with the land and constitute and cqui2able ser- a vitude as to any security interest given to secure a note or other i obligation evidence by deed of trust or mortgage. In the event of the enforcement of any security interest given, be that by power of 7 sale or indicial act or conveyance in lieu of foreclosure, the person yor entity acquiring title by such proceedings shall acquire title ;t subject to these covenants, conditions and restrictions. Any subsequent G- v w sale or transfer of interest by any party so acquiring title shall contain reference to these covenants, conditions and restrictions and any subse- quent vendee, grantee or donee as the person acquiring title shall take title subject to the covenants, conditions and restrictions. 3. These covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be enforceable against all ultimate users of the property and shall constitute such equitable servitude notwithstanding a conveyance fails to refer to these covenants, conditions and restrictions. The fore- going restrictions ai:d covenants will be in full force and effect until January 1, 1998 and will automatically be renewed thereafter for successive periods of ten (10) years unless the owners of the property and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall file a protest or a relinquishment of rest- rictions in the office of the County Recorder within the year proceding the year 1998, or any other successive date as provided heroin. 4 Encept as otherwise herein provided, if any owner of said property or any part of said property or any person claiming under -him or the heirs, successors or assigns, of such person, shall violate or attempt to violate any of the conditions provided for herein, it shall be lawful for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against any such violation either to prevent im from doing to or to recover damages for such violation or both. S. It is not the intention of the owner to create hereby, a condition subsequent or a condition of forfeiture, or possibility of reverter in the event of any violation of any of the provisions herein set forth, but it is the intention that the remedy for the enforcement of this general plan of covenants and restrictions shall be an action for injunction to prevent the violation thereof, or by an action for damages or for both. Such action or actions shall inure to and pass with each and every part of said property for the mutual benefit of the subsequent -3- /1 0 M owner or owners thereof and their successors and assigns and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 6. That in the event any covenant or condition therein �i contained be invalid or held to be invlaid or void by any Court of competent jurisdiction such invalidity or voidness shall in no way affect any valid covenant or condition herein contained. Y 7. That no waiver of a breach of any of the covenants, conditions or restrictions herein contained shall be construed to be a waiver of any su= ceeding breach of the same or any other covenants, agreements, restrictions or conditions. i 0. In the event of bn action to enforce the items k: of these covenants, conditions and restrictions, the prevailing party 4� Y, shall in addition to all other relief, be entitled to reasonable attorney's i fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said owner has caused this instrument to be duly executed this 7 'a day of 1970. R !K D UEZ, 'a_A R SEARCH OMPANY 0 0 EXHIBIT "A" hl OVA IANII IISI tNll RIIIL111NG REGULATIONS J ' hl 017 \ t' I U1'nM Ihf I+r1n1.011 1'1111N +Y'.111,1 .Il+lth'JIIUII pl Ihl' IhHn'1 'hall h• fm %null IIIIIIIr+1 dN +l +I +1114 Urllrf' I +Lrlllled JINI de'lpmd 111 'ppl4 LIU' +11 N1111 the t MMI% 1'I 11.imse 1 uuunl.'oul lit nleel nelphlNnhn, N1 'hupplllp acrd. lie Inllo%1"lx 1, pal uoul' .11.111 ,q,1 +11 m f 1 Nc1pIdNNlhunl Ibuim•'1 UI'lll'J% 1.11 t „'rl It %I 1' \I\ 1'1 Ithil 111If 111 Itcadrnlul ( \I \n: u'r Ih•nnmrd In Ihr It I It It. t, Jnd All lh.lri,1.pim NI11Ix. it'll nw "11all Im p'61ruled 1, 11'e np'6IJb,+n, Jppl)alp its Iirnl'61 Ihr d"Iml n1 N Imll Illre ale ford 11'14 J' prnnlllul uw•1 1111 \I. +ICI 11+1 Ill'til \I Sti 1' \111'1.12 \II I'llll III RCiJd ♦IUrc' 1111 Ih1uL w 'IJli,merl .wrr ri 1 1 nnl.•. bunerl 'wm` 1111 III Lp 'IPIr 11 1 1111 1% or nor 1,,11"1.+Ir 11 I 1 11.11'1 'q pll l 'I1,1+ Il,l IJ,hU1 111111 ur 1rprl Jld'''I PIt' 1111 11.1,INJ1r m Ch., In'J1.11,1'11 Ill. e'hgc i l l 1'•11 r111 'Ime 111 \1.•41111 Ikcl or dellemr,wil'IPIe 1]I ullhe nllmunel Spar 1 \I \uen11'611d'' ImILnlp Iu1 • 1111 011ow' 11u'uu•'•'6r pu+lr "In1111 1 \I \Illnll;l +1'111, w'IN'C dJhnll I+IUt Nled 111.01 .III% 111.1jor Tire 1:pnnllV 1•an.11 1ha14nIV .'61d 'I„l.lp,• ni menhlllll' a JIM 'ttpp11r'. I1111n'Jnnll JIM N 1,11mg Jle'undu'Ird 1,1'611 wuluu J Ivul'11114 \re yM'dk w ilu'l. hquw Will w\ "IhNI (11 II_7. \111 1 \m 1114 1 I I i -, ;o 1111 IIr111' It I h,n lhr'llup JIM IN`JIlt1 pJam 1111 1 Ile w le'litirJ111 IC \'11h1111x dJlh lllp P1 entertainnl'•utl 111 1R, wnvdI 11 I < I.nhC' 'lemung Jp'•11'1 Jnd 111 pqw "'6p eda1111'hnh•ul Il,l (1141 at I. +dre huNli'n+Ill l• lulenul .I FAVIml' nw.1.111u11 1111 l•NUUUnnl1 'Cn1er III Iho'w11JLer',I uulluwvl '11up ` 111 1luu, nlCdlr.d denl•d.'hlu'pt•11 U..,r lhlnrpudi'I + '111 I '6111,111 4ern'1 MI 11 1 1 +61.11, �1 I J 1123115, 11) l� o ,. •L fl .%� " ZONIN'Cr CUllk C•1 IIi4f'rf • 1 61 017A a' i IN) 11m1 U11hV 1f11 16tH .tire and repair • III Ijdnr ' :+ t 141 Illtt'1 114'4 4,:,star 111 file J14nte 11 Jpinu \vd fly IIIL Nifin{nF I unneri,.nul 1 I. Isle Iullu,vinF ImN Stijl, IV pvllnillCJ• {i 16e Ilualitin ]nd Jet clople 'lil plJI1 is Jpp.LU Vd at ]tell%file d 11 RCCn j +uI r, I Ip 19111 1��) ),1,1,11,• tiJ \1111:•• JIM Illaa, sir flint, I Jlll'I•111F ,IrIh IIIIC e ' J,1111), IIII,IIIF 1 d,Tined in tit•,hill Ire I11li INll11 q11, petllnllell ulllt 111 file IIIU11'llalll ar,•J ]\ Iwall"it JIIII IIt•1,'Iti)nIY'1 IIIJ , rIIII�JIII ,IIJti 411,11111 \,ills 111\ Jl,I1lI,•Jil„ Air 11 I YIICI aI Ilulq• I114l1 11.I11L1 III yld• title III 'Ittillit I'UIIInIhN011el JIIJ at's usher I it t'"il 1111 he l v,I I I I nYI 1 It .l I,JII%IJF ,'II I Cf ]tfl,e ❑'FIIIJInI) JFe1K \' 1111u4' Jllprnt J, h In IIe14.1 a III I IIVIII I III\ /11 11\'1 S: 111 \tI .1„r,.. .(tells. 111 Illl,lllt',4. JIIII I4• ver.lh'll Il Nillltll \t lessees .III ,•Ih l „4yI Iy11tJ1OF ' 1 J 1!1 iII p1,4I11,1. , l IV Motel al retail r it site , III 1111„'11.4I1e1111•f lull 111 IIIN,ICNJI. ,,Ll I1 e•IIF•IF,•11 III 1 Ill,, 111 ,11,11 l,l•,,,,I.Illlll ,111 1 , 11:0 tt'lf\ 1,11111p 1,1I III,, 'I II,'f4111, ,IIJII I4• I 111 SIG \S Materials. Cnn.hn'Ied 41111111 Mlle ll� C \hY{nr JFII Jisplp• .D]I! IMlijlll nil) to a er4• 1411111II1 Illl,t {IIF JIIII .II.III I4' ifil -1I\Y1 _ Jim .IF.Illi,l J WJII or Illt• F. Ifilw CI WIIII III tents /IVIIJI 111114'nVlul•. ,isIII >IIJII Illlt• l .” IJIlr 111,1 l4tih•CI a14nC flat IIIJI I11 j It'1.11IV, I4 rfe,',IJIII,i11F ,IFII >IIJII I ) 111 41 Jlnl•pinF ,elllel, ' ' • Ilnp (i) 1,11 \ill,• \L1,1I Gillllll 11 Its IhIJI1Ml11JIC1114n1J1`.1 list',%flop1 " -,ltv( >11.111 11111 C1.. ?IFJI ,• \,cell lul,' llllll,ir,•11 J11,1 4 \1) 1tldIt ,1(IIJIe Ilyl III, tI111111F indl \{dull .lisle due, list\ pjnels \u Sul IIIL• e\CCeJ unv herndrl'll 11(p) l ., are feel. �.ny`�u b In•r+1 ILnllill\'ll J Lill d4'JI u1"I" let' mhn-1 ll of I,IJIIIPt al ka,l ilvn llerllllrCof 1!1)(11 tllll]fv title >Ill,l IV 1 -"tin rea•1 III 11ulk, ll J lh'f111Jl1en1 If11FJ11. 1 U,I,Ier• All rr%, III" in {IFII 1, 11 1\• tl,•>IFIt'l, asses IIMa1CJ 41 ) 41011 Jlsl glee 1111 f {le. JIIJ 41 at lens 11, to I lief VFllt Jell lung rrnln nit' .Ili ,Anil Ill U,hlf14l Ili• , je W Ur IIIt1l11f { >;( Ville 11 11f I lh t u11e111Su le 1111 nanlerlYnl liver err tine I11 1 in•L'\,JIItI111F 1•t,•11111ii JII• III ,IF), -11 V1611C IIIJ) IV ihfllllll,•J, jll aJ1I11I1,1I 111 IIIL• test sell revel > Je >i 1eJ '1 111 &•cline h1.0!7MCII.i IIA1. P and I,I All %flan $lull IM I I ul a, nul In u1„ IIIICI JFhl Ji.lan,1 nn sjle. and lc M In tilhlnnI Iiu \feu ul umI.Thil. Ila ilknllfr]linn >IVn rurinwlrl'tidrnnSl u,es.lx I,11 1_ 1 lu I•JnlJde Jl1pfPYe'll to ) IIM llanr•01F • _ ' • I I, frt Ju /al •'i • o EXHIBIT "B' PROPOSED ALLOWABLE USES FOR 19th AND AHETHYST CENTER Rancho Cucamonga 1. a ery -- n 2. Bock Store -3+--- 5.•r! CI7Y OP RACHO CU MMOBGA STAFF MORT TO: CITY MUM AIM IMMUS OF THE CITY CCMICIL FROM: JACK uM. DIRECTOR OP COMMITY DEVELOPMENT SUW=, ADOPTION OF INMIX GROWTH MA4ACEHMT STRATWY Dlthin the last two marks the Planning Comissio.t has been working extensively with the B.LA., School Districts and the builders to seek a reasonable way of eliminating the current backlog of approved tentatives while afafatzin& the impaction on the School Dlstrlctn. Atteclyd plea. find Resolution 78-19 of the Planning Commission recommending a Growth Paaagenent Strategy. The resolution encompasses of" (9) points. 1) Continue the soratorfm os new residential development (unapproved tentative). 2) All" coustructioti of V"I- dences by single lot owner- buildcrs. 3) All" "lacing residential p-rcei mps to be processed and bvlldiag perolts issued for development. 4) Exist iog ata- approved tentative naps would he tieated as ne% files after July 1, 1Sr79. - 5) The building permlts schedule for calendar year 1979 be adopted. 0 Set a tine limit of 120 days to pull building permits and start construction after the approval of the final cap. 7) Builders be encouraged to make arrangements directly with the School District to fulfill the requirerents of Ordimanc 30 (SB 201). 8) Hemr the previous B.I.A. agreement. 9) Encourage state remresmta- tives to develop and vigorously support leglstacim to provide new, deans of school financing. The Planning Commission considered the Growth Mamagrseat Strategy ou the Decacber 13 meeting, and at that tine Input was taken frm the audience. The Alta Icca School District represented by Ys. Jim McMurtry stated that a continuation of the moratorium would %a In order even though the anticipation was that in February or March of 1979 the School District would have ccgleted rte Stork Elementary Sch of and .e off of double sessions. Addit"atly, be moved that with the release of boud money ac the begimiag of 19790 Ic was quite possible that the District would be able to handle the existing Inventory of ',760 units w.lthcut gain& back on double session. Daring the disrassfons the District brat-ght out the fact that appro:faacelq 400 eighth graders are graduated each year and that epproxixately 300 kindergartners are adaftted. Stork School will provide an caws of sans 200 " 34DO students. The Caacisstm tadicatef to the District that while double saslon my now be the optfmm c3ucation, ccltb" is coatinu aclon of the moratorium. If the mratorirm were coatimed, It would nut only stop development, but scup many of the proyraas that the City is currently or pro)ectcJ to begin such as the General Plan rlenccts. The Chsis^ noted that in order to make ends meet, some develrscat must eomtime through the Year of 1979. Io working with the B.I.A. the builders have suggested a voluntary pbasfag of the approved tentatives for the nett 2 years. This reduces ftpacts [Isar. these tracts would have upom the School Districts. The phaafng program pmmusei by the builders has been adJwted slightly by staff to achieve a clear balance for Permit issuance. The building permit schedule " finally adjusted by staff is attached; it Is entitled - 9ailding Permit Schavmole. It above only the song during 1979 in which sorer tracts would poll their pelts. The anticipated ■� 0 0 Page 2 impact upon the Alta Loma and Central School Districts would be In 1980, approximately 1 year from the issuance of building permits. Therefore, the earliest impact upon the School Districts would begin in March. of 1980, and be phased through to 1981. You will note that twat of the occupancy begins to occur in the Months of April to August This would shift the bulk of the student impact to the latter part of the 1980 school year. The pharing schedule of the remaining approved tentatives would not only soften the impact upon the School Districts but also help to maintain a predictable level of residential construction activity. RECOMENDATIONS The Planning Commission recommends that t..e City Council adopt an ordinance that would legislate the recommendations contained in Resolution 78 -39. Due to the shortness of time involved with this matter a draft ordinance has not been included in thin transmittal. The City Attorney will have a draft ordinance for you at ,our Nednesday night meeting. This aho.,ld be adopted as an urgency ordinance. Respectfull submitted, JACK LAY, DIRECTOR DP CW"ITY DEVELOPMENT JL: Bf.R: m Attachments: Resolution 78 -39 Building Industry letter to Chairman Rempel B.I.A. voluntary phasing program Dr. Janczyk's letter Staff and special .ommlttee recommendation Statue of approved tracts on the B.I.A. phasing agreement Ptavlously approved by City Council Planning Commission Staff report 0 • RESOLUTION 110. 78 -19 A RESOLUIIO4 OF TIM PLANNING COK4ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA RECOMIENDING A GROWTH HANACENENT STRATEGY TO THE RANCHO CUCAHONGA CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission desires to develop a comprehanr :.ve growth management program for the community; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission desires to do so through a responsible investigation of public service capabilities relative to development in chis city; and WHERE.1S, there are approved tentative tracts which the City no longer has review authority for; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has mat with School District Off icia:s and discussed the school Impact problems; and WHEREAS. the scope and nature of the problem is such that a total ablu- tion to the school impaction problem requires assistance by the Scale; and WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commieslons' desire to recommend an interim growth macagement strategy that would limit the amount of new residential con- struction in the City in order to help mitigate the school impaction problems until a more comprehensive solution through the passage of new laws at the State level can be achieved NON, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends to the City Council that the present moratorium qn residential development within Rancho Cucamonga be lifted on its date of expLration, being January 1, 1979, and that the following interim growth manage- ment strategy be adopted and proper municipal legislation bu developed to imple- ment the same: 1. Continue a moratsrim on new residential development applications with the exception of applications fur multi - family, medium and high density developmento until July 1, 1979 after which new residential development files must suet the criteria of any com- prehensive growth management program developed by that date. 2. The construction of residences by single lot owner builders as defined by the current moratorium ordinance be exempted and allowed to obtain building permits. J. All existing residential parcel maps curreetly on file with the City may be processed after map be 1, 1919 r r_� eW ser parcel map be is v psios -to July 1 n1 io- kw bw in „� �f� n we& WAN i 4. All existing unapproved tentative tract maps currently on file with the City e1m11 be treated as new files after July 1, 1979 and must conform to any grnuth management criteria developed by that date and that the applicants be credited with Proportionate fees already puld for processing of their existing tewtatives provided that the re- application occurs prior to January 1, 1980. S. The attached buildin$ permit schedule for calendar year 1919 be adopted. (Exhibit 'A') 6. A developer has 120 days from the time a building permit Is Issued to start construction Constructiun Is defined as con - gtruction of foundations for the dwellings Grading is not considered as dtarting construction If the developer has not started construction of the dwelling found4r1C... within 120 days of issuance, the building permits and /or the sever allocation are revoked and no longer valid. 7 The builders, through the cooperation of the B.I.A., be encouraged to make direct arrangements with the School Districts to fulfill the requ!rments of Ordinance 30. _ 8. The previous B.I.A. phasing agreement be honored. 9. The Planning Commission adapts the Tentative Work Schedule for the development of a comprehensive Growth Manag,ment Program (Exhibit "e ") 10 The City requests our State Representatives to develop and /or vigorously support legislation that would provide new means for school financing and to modify current laws that would limit the use of exlstlug fiscal resources; i.e. outstanding bolds. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1978. PLANNING C%14ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rmpel, Chairxon ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Comfa- sion held on the 13th day of December, 1978. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CR4LISSIOL7ERS: ABSENT: COlf4ISSIONMs: 4 • Q.i. d BUILDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION A OF FOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. RIvri SIDE- SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES F tGfi II1,r1L�L { REGION O 147 N TENTH AVE., STE. 8 a UPLAND, CA. 91786 6 (714) 981.2997 C C CIA{ December 7, 1978 Mr. Herman Rempel, Chairman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Chairman: In accordance with the Commission's request that the DIA provide some idea of how or when enisting approved tentatives would seek to record if considering only market considerations, I've attpclTed the following page. Should these tracts see), to conform with a voluntary phased yrouth plan, it could be desirabl'a to have some written agreement with the city. Such agreement should include: A. The tract may final during a specified month D. Sewer allocation will be saved for use by that tract until at least that month, or that if sewer is available during that month It will not be denied. C The tract shall be exempt from any future moratorium only if one is in effect during the agreed nonth for recordation. Further, I've attached a letter from an econom.st, Dr. Joseph Janczyk (Assistant Professor !It Calif. State College, San Bernardino) regarding certain fiscal impacts pertaining to a continued morator- ium. Ile notes that the loss in revenue to the city would exceed $1,000,000.00 (not counting foes for permits). I've attached a COPY of his report, Economic Impacts of Hous ing .Moratoria: The Case Of Rancho Cucamonga. In closing, let Ina indicate that the BIA appreciates the )pportunity to make input to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on this important matter. All of our contacts with city staff have been cordial and fair. Sinccrell, i JK�jneth` 11 Willis, Ex cutive Director n `D ", BIA of Southern California KW /kk B.I.A. VOLUNTARY PHASING PROGRAM FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA - DECEMBER 8 1978 i93 FOR APPROVED TENTATIVES ONLY School Grading Building Recordation Tract t If Units District Permits Permits Ohmer —T9 T9_ January 9434 32 A.L.E. February April Chevron January 9193 35 C S 0. March Hay Trinity January 9479 49 C.S D {larch May K d 8 January 9387 * 48 A L.E. February March Jones Co. February 9262 46 C S.0 August October Trinity February 9369 Apt's A L.E. February April Jensen (These Apt's consist of 96 units: 24 3- bedroom, 40 2- bedroom and 24 1- bedroom) March 9454 59 A.L E. April June Porter - Wilder March 9589 31 C S.D March flay Dennis Renter April 9567 _ 33 A L E April June Ken Ilanning April 9423 23 C S U April June Coral Nay 9472 60 A.L.E flay July Boulavard Dev June 9480 54 ;.S.D. June July K b 8 July 9436 28 A.L.E. August October Chevron July 9437 27 A L E August October Chevron Septenber 9264 48 A L E. September November Dra:or September 9637 31 A.L E October December Chevron 604 - R -1 96 - R -3 • 9387, though an approved tentative which would have been built nearly a year ago had sewer allocating bee, available, may soon be threatened wTth- condemnation proceedings. by the Alta Loma School District The School District would like to locate a school on that site. There is, however, 18 acres of vacant land one and one -half blocks southeast of the tract site. R.L.E. - Alta Loma School District C S.0 - Central School District In aidition to the above, the following two tracts wish to proceed in the year 1980. 1980 March 9435 42 A L.E. March flay Chevron June 9638 25 A.L E. JurP. August Chevron 67 R -1 units d 1HE DEER CREEK DEVELOPHEHT SCHEDULE FOR RANCHO CUCAHONGA These tracts are non - severed approved tentatives with a selling price begining at $125,000 00 They all include one acre sites for each lot. Grading Building Recordation ' Tract I I Units Permits Permits Owner 1979 July 9583 49 July August Deer Creek 1980 April 9584 -1 47 April May Deer Creek 1981 January 9584 -2 45 January February Deer Creek October 9584 -3 52 October November Deer Creek NOTES: The above schedule shows that Deer Creek would like to begin production on: 49 units to 1979 47 units in 1980 and 97 units in 1981 Adding the Deer Creel non - severed tracts to the srwered tracts, we see a-residential construction schedule for Rancho Cucamonga developing in the following manner: In 1979 there will be a possibility of as many as 653 R -1 units begining construction. In 1980 that number will be reduced to 114 units. If processing of new developments continues to be slow after the creation and Introduction of the new growth management program, then 1981 may only experience a residential building program with 97 units. This building program, if accepted, will produce a student loading factor by: Alta Loma School District 1980 to 1981 - 232 new students (figure includes apar,ments) 1981 to 1982 - 68 new students Central School District 1980 to 1981 - 238 new students 72 • 0 gc° pr T 9"A 9P.9) 6.-000;. e..-L4 951 5,...18:.a Q.i. 71%.:8fl.ima. e.92997 Typl .. 249.6781 December 7, 1978 Hr. Ken Willis, Executive Director Region •D°, B.I.A of So California 147 8 10th Ave , Ste 0 Upland, CA 91786 Dear Mr Willis: Persuant to our recent telephone conservation, I an providing you with - some estimates of the economic and fiscal impacts of a proposed extention of the current building moratorium to Rancho Cucamonga. The analysis is based upon my previous study, Economic Impacts of Housing Moratoria: The Case of Rancho Cucamonga (June 1978 ). appropriately-revised for the impact of Proposition 13 sales tax collections. I(y understanding is that the moratorium woold halt development of 780 single - family units on lots smaller than 7s acre, with sewer hookups, and priced in the $60- 70,000 range; 240 single - family units on lots larger than y acre, with septic tanks, and priced at $90,0000 and above; and 96 apartment units. In capsule form, the economic impacts are as follows: 1. Mousing prices in Rancho Cucamonga should increase above their normal levels, in response to a decrease to the number of units supplied as a result of the moratorium's restrictions. Building activity would then flow to the surrounding areas, namely Ontario, itontclair, and Upland. 2. The impact on the economy of Rancho Cucamonga (including both primary and induced impacts), assuming that the information above is correct, would be a reduction of about $178,000,000 in residents' incomes. 3 Local tax collections would also be reduced: property taxes, by about $783,000, sales taxes, by about $187,000; and gasoline taxes, by about $36,000; for a total of about $1,006,000. In view of the substantial magnitudes of these economic and fiscal impacts, I strongly recommend that an alternative solution to the district's problems be found that does not involve such a burden on the community and its residents. xJ T. anc k, Ph.O. H g � 9 � o ro rt A �o P Y O 'y0 P N Y • O N b b C C O Y b b I i • N mg n rr n F � 6 � n N e H v B �C R 1 Y b �J m H 9 I "s s O p b b M 4 n b p H S I I n I Q n > H b N r to e u 9 m P •O v V r V ' rY N W •Oi i+ d v c t/I PPVi+•6 r 6 :•r PN W a � n r W� N b/�V H^ H YI /�Y WPNY •D p W bW � � v x 1+ •O fl vpNY Nv •O 7 n fl H I n W W b O N n M (n� A •n r P V P P P Z., v •p v P O P •O N b > n IY m 0 WPYm � P•/m n W W V W uH C A m P v m O O 'WpON YbYbNV 1+ H.. H..H r W J m P P V PmN O N•ONV P•O v R V"'�P�N Y JPmPPN v tJ •/ W �/ P V P N v P p v P N 9 b W Q W I ar V N mg n rr n F � 6 � n N e H v B �C R 1 Y b �J m H 9 I I , u STATUS OF APPROVED TRACTS ON THE PREVIOUS B I.A PHASING AGREL4ElT THAT WAS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Total 189 December 12, 1978 BUILDING PERHTS ISSUED 1978 BIA List (non- sewered) Recorded Tracts Mother of lots Developer + 9176 14 Jim Bice 9351 63 Hark III 9420 35 Ka'_bach 9421 38 Kalbach 9430 29 Bob Buchanan 9440 45 Chevron 9569 36 Falcon Const. 9582 -2 49 Griffin Dev 9588 10 Wm. Perry 9596 36 Carry Hiller Total 355 a PENDING - NO PERMITS ISSUED (; Approved Non - Recorded 9445 61 Hark III 9505 16 Bob Roper 9539 18 Banyan Heights Dev. j. 9540 45 Banyan Heights Dev. 9587 49 Griffin Dev. Total 189 0 GROWRI MANAGFMEMf WR[ PROGRAM • The following Is a proposed growth management work program. When revlaving this program, keep in mind that Staff is assua:ng that a moratorium on unapproved tentative* and new residential filings (applications) will be adopted ;a allow for development of the Growth Management Plan November 29, 1978 Special meeting - Growth Management Strategy December - February Staff inventory of city service capability February 21, 1979 Special meeting - Discussion of city aoals and policies, City service capability and growth management implementation techniques February 21 - April 11 Staff preparation of draft Growth Management Plan April 11 Planning Commlcaion Study Session - Draft Growth Management Plan April 18 Adjourned meeting - First Planning Coemisafon public hearing April 25 Planning Commission meeting - Continuatioa of public hearint May 2 Adjourned meeting (if necessary) May 9 Wrap up Growth Management Plan June 6 City Council public hearing June 20 City Council - Ordinance adoption July 2 Implementation of Gri,:h Management Plan EXHIBIT "B" as ��+q. _ ,r •i_. \ �„�.�k< -im"i i. �_. ' --ti f•.. ^w+.'.-= a.:.�n'..v "-nx � f --n.. wivmr^A�t!° -'r�; ;r���'r P. C�1�7 �.tl.� t I •'rS 'Z l'.� :.L. � r • • iJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANPUM t DATE: December 10, 19741 TO: City Council and City Hanager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ROAD MAINTENANCE CONTRACT In accordance with the contract for road maintenance entered Into July 10, 1978, with San Bernardino County, the City shall define its ordinar/ street *t auatnte aGl..a program prfot to January 1, of each year. Is conformance with this provision the County has requested that the City Srdicata, At this time, Its intention to continue the contract for the 79- AO Fiscal ?nor. The full program and definition of services to be more _ fully developed prior to the beginning of the fiscal year it July Attached for your review are copies of the original contract information including the 1978 -79 Ordinary Haintenance Program 'rho maintenance program as a whole is working very succossiully with a strong cooperation by the County personnel. 'the cost projections, at this point, are close to the overall projected $350,000 annual program with some varia- tlono in certain categories of work. Fnglneering will be more closely ana- lyzing the overall program and will prepare a more eetailed proposal to the Council in the neat future. This proposal will Include oosslble contracts for special services free private contractors, potential cooperative programs with other Cities and the beginning of a City Public Works Department. The program as currently envisioned, will maintain the current County staffing levels, but will likely involvu a shift in emphosis from this years' program. RECOWENDATION• - - - The Engineering Division reconnends that the City Council direct staff to notify the San Bernardino County Transportaclon Department of the City's intention to continue the current level of rand maintenance serviced through the 1979 -80 Fiscal year. Respectfully su mimed L 0' HUBBS City Engineer LH:deb v �al It• Y; (Y:4 .., • 0 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 28, 1978 TO: Lauren M Wasserman City Manager FROM: Lloyd Mubbs City Engineer SUBJECT: County Street Maintenance Agreement Attached for Council consideration Is the contract for the continuation of street maintenance services by the San Bernardino County Road Department Contract services are currently being carried Out without agreement, and it is advisable to execute a formal contract as soon as possible This contract basically calls for a continuance of maintenance activities at current levels of service as though the City were still in the unincorporated area. The con- tract tails for reimbursements at cost for all services provided Work has been divided into two categories: Ordinary Maintenance Work Other Than Ordinary Maintenance The Ordinary Maintenance Program has been outlined In advance and included in the agreement The estimated cost of this program Is approximately $350.000 The Ordinanry Maintenance Program as defined is only a projection of proposed activity based on historical experience. The actual program will be carried out in cooperation with the City through work schedules to be prepared every two weeks throughout the year These schedules will be responsive to seasonal work needs and requests from the comsunity to cover specific problem areas Monthly billings will be prepared with Itemized job records Including personnel and equipment costs for the various Items of work. Administrative costs of thirteen percent will be Included. Attached to the contract are personnel and equipment costs upon which billings are to be based The County has Indicated that the existing program is typically lower ttan other cities in the areas of tree trimming, street sweeping and weed abatement Higher levels of service may be provided through specific arrangements made under the cate;ory of Work Other Than Ordinary Maintenance These services will be provided upon a detailed request approved In advance with a commitment of funds by the City Council Attached Is a list of example of road maintenance activities included within the agreement LH:ba EXAIIPLES OF ROAD I1AINTEMANCE INCLUDED III AGREEMENT Work Activity Moving to Job Watering Seal coating - chip seal Seal coating - liquid seal P C C curb and gutter Sidewalk S driveway Retaining wall Bridge substructure Bridge Superstruct,i,e Tree Trimming 6 Removal Culverts, downdrains b underdrains Dead animal removal Shoulder - grading Shoulder - cleaning debris Shoulder - chemical weed control Shoulder -other weed control Roadway - sweeping Roadway -drag brooming Roadway - grading , Roadway -hand patching Roadway - equipment patching i• Description Moving equipment to Job site Haul iig, spreadin, and sprinkling Prepay Ong and brooming surface, hauling and spreading oil, spreading screened aggre ate, covering with roadside material (desert , rolling and broomina Preparing and brooming surface, hauling and and spreading liquid asphalt All costs including material, grading, and backfill All costs including material, grading and backfill Rock or masonry Pilinl, structural steel, tinbers and lumber below 'Sridge seat. Includes hauling. Structural steel, timber, etc , above top of bridge seat To eliminate hazards to traffice and private property Cleaning and r- pairing culverts and other drainage facilities including inlet and outlet s'ructures Pick -uo and disposal of dead animals from road right -of -way 3rading earth shoulders adjacent to existing paved roads Pick -up and disposal of debris and trash APp;ication of chemicals to control weeds Hand or equipment removal of weeds Tractor broom, truck broom and handsweeping of paved roadway Drag brooming of graded earth roads Grading earth roads to maintain drainage and /or riding quality Patching chuckholes, filling cracks, etc Pating large areas of roadway using motorgrader and other equipment R.11 S. b P.I1 S Dike IWintaining traffic facilities — o��,ntinn All costs Including grading and backfill Routine repair or replacement of signs, street markers, guardrails, paddles reflectors, etc , Including supervision �v14I 303 •13G5 —••• ...VI JOHN P.INCM[; •1I �.l,f• OYKIw 11 i,.n,MU1lM .• •A'. June 23, 1978 Mr. Lauren Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Base Line - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Lloyd Hubbs Dear Mr. Wasserman: Attached for your further processing is a draft road maintenance agreement whereby the County will perform road maintenance within the City. The County's road maintenance is typically lower than cities in the areas of tree trimming, street sweeping and weed abatement. 1 would suggest that if you desire higher levels of service in these areas, you could contract for tree work and sweeping. The County Agriculture Department 31ght be able to assist in a ::cod abatement program. Also attached is a proposed annual ordinary maintenance program which would previde the same level of service as the unincorporated areas. A detailed breakdown of this, or a similar fo:mac, is required ,nder Section 5 of the Agreement At our meeti,,, %st week, you inquired as to: 1) whether or not the County could continue processing and inspecting permits until such time as the City staff was oa board; and 2) information regarding sub- division inspection. With respect to permits, the County can provide processing and inspection service at a rate of $35.00 for each permit.- We would have the manpower to provide this service for approximately 3 months. All fees collected would be turned over to the City. The $35.00 handling fee would include only issuance and inspection of the permit. All other costs such as engineeri "g, surveying, and construc- tion would be paid by the City. With respect to subdivision inspection, we will continue inspection on those subdivisions on which maps have been recorded until completion, ,a wl, 0 Mr. Lauren Nassernian June 23, 1970 Page 2 or January 1, 1979, whichever occurs first. On subdivisions where we have collected fees, but the map has not been recorded, we will complete the plan checking and turn over the in portion of the fee to the City. The City will be responsible for inspection of all tracts that have not been recorded by July 1, 1978. Storm damage repair from the spring storms will be completed as soon as reasonably possible. Repair costs over and above that set aside under 77/78 routine maintenance and disaster claims will be covered by budget adjustments as described in interoffice memos to the City dated May 31, and June 13, 1978. Very truly yours, JOHN R. SHONE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION By G u B. L. Ingram Assistant Road Commissioner - Operations BLI:kk Attach: As noted cc: Earl Goodwin John Bernard John Shone r�F , • ANNUAL ORDINARY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1978 -79 *includes average charges for labor, equipment and materials 0 78 -79 roposed Direct Proposed Budget Maintenance Activity Mar. Days Cost per Man /Day' 78 -79 Supervision 400 $121 $ 48,400 Traffic Maintenance 270 136 36,720 Miscellaneous 45 148 6,660 Tree Work 285 130 37,050 Structure Maintenance 106 134 14,204 Shoulder Grading 40 148 5,920 Cleaning Debris 90 118 10,620 Chemical Weed Control 35 200 7,000 Mechanical Weed Control 220 145 31,900 Sweeping 53 156 8,268 Hand Patching 230 132 30,360 Equipment Patch 78 198 13,860 Storm Maintenance 400 147 _ 58,800 $309,762• +135 administrative overhead 40,'269.06 $350,031 06 *includes average charges for labor, equipment and materials 0 COUNTY OF SAN SERNAPOINO STANDARD CONTRACT PWA - Transportation Cgn1Y CtMlm'nl Cml,xl N.ry.YnY1M B. L lnuram 1001 Il n.nR.n,•. ❑ sN.,.,au• Ph e.l 0.1. anaa,lUml NC SuUUp,a to funl NO p,n Ne wmwMO nxl CMJ Oti OC.wnenu• L]R, •Rg 11CMUxllu•mwelnp wu prymanl w,lYipl, 65 w # taRrbR Ilu lello.rwy ,w r,dnal N�.Ner Of Prym,nl, _ 1 fhv"nlUtl— Cwrrylnr N,Nml of nA L -- THIS CONTRACT is entered Into In the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereafter called the County. and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfIONGA here:Acr called CITY IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: fth "pace lwfow and terone ndc of hndl d needed Set farfh rorr¢e ro ae mMerM, onrnum to he pod, nw w of paymont, mile for pertornMna or co nplel o, rk1HINNnOn Of Llhilnetnry pryfWWW"Ce and CAIV for fen n uthim, other tons and condd)rn", and attach pbn2, yMClhCanam, and addend, d any) WIVEAS the CITY is desirous of contracting with COUNTY for the perform- ance of certain street maintenance and improvement functions within its boundaries by COUNTY through the Road Commissioner thereof; and MIEREAS the COUNTf is agreeable to rendering such services on the terns and conditions hereinafter set forth; and WIIEREAS such contract is authorized and provided for by the provisions Of Article 1, Cha,,er I, Part 2, Division 1, Title 5 of the Goverment Code; THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1 COUNTY, by and th ough its Transportation Oepdrtment, will perform for CITY any and all functions coming within the jurisdiction of the Road Commissioner relating to the maintenance of streets, subject to written request therefor and to the general terms and conditions hereinafter set forth 2 Said Transportation Department shall maintain and repair all public streets within CITY with the same power with reference thereto as if said streets were within the unincorporated area of COUNTY, the City Council of CITY exercisino the same authority with reference to work on said streets as the Board of Supervisors would exercise if said streets were in the unincorporated territory of COUNTY Nothing herein contained shall be construed as in any way divesting CITY of any of its pmfers with respect to the supervision, manage- ment and central of streets within its boundaries Any Provisions on the reverse side and referenced attachments hereof constitute a part of this contract and are incorporated herein In lull. or 32211.10, 0." anon ,It P... I n, t�3. •• For the r ose of performing said funs rs, COUNTY shall P P g Y :: "•' .,., furnish and supply all necessary labor, supervision, machinery, equipment, materials, anJ supplies other than those to be fur - "'C nished by CITY, necessary to carry nut the instructions of CITY and to maintain CITY streets in a condition desired by CITY Both parties agree that they and their officers and agents shall cooperate to the carrying out of said functions y and that the Road Commissioner shall have full authority, possession and necessary control of the work with full assist- ance when necessary, from the police of CITY or such other law enforcement agency as may be rendering police service therein For the Purpose of facilitating the performance of said func- tions, the City Council, upon request of the Road Commissioner - or his duly authorized representative, will order the temporary closing to traffic of all streets, or portions thereof, necessary to be closed before any scheduled work is commenced thereon a Emergency road closures may be made by COUNTY without Prior r approval of City Council s 4 For the Purpose of performing said services hereunder, the work i is divided into two categories, that (a) ordinary maintenance and repair; and (b) work other than ordinary maintenance and repair f Ordinary maintenance and repair of streets within rITY may be, in writing: a Requested in advance and listed in accordance with Section 5 Such ordinary maintenance and repair shall be performed without demand b Requested as services are desired by CITY ' Work other than ordinary maintenance and operation will be Performed only under order of the Council of CITY or such agent 'r. or representative thereof as may he designated by such Council of CiTY. and with the approval thereof by the Board of ' Supervisors of the COUNTY or such agent or representative thereof as may be designated by such Board of Supervisors Such work shall encompass all work not. to the opinion of that x Road Commissioner ordinary maintenance and repair, and shall • include but not be limited thereby, the construction of new streets, bridges, or like facilities or structures, or the -2- ,1 a .J y}-.': nx ems•. M`_i•° a- • • construction of new improvements therein or thereon; relocation ` of existing street facilities-. major street reconstruction or alterations; roadway .... abatement programs, excepting herbi- cide application; and the taking of measures necessary to pre - vert or relieve from the effects of storm or flood waters Requests for services hereunder shall set forth in detail the facilities and /or services desired and estimated cost thereof 5. During the life of this agreement said City Council, before the first day of January each year, shall define Its ordinary street maintenance program for the ensuing fiscal year. This definition shall be in the form of an annual work program listing the work activities desired, the estimated man /day resources desired and the estimated cost thereof All special construction and maintenance projects shall be requested or consented to by said City Council. 6 The Transportation Department of COUNTY shall not perform any function hereunder not coming within the scope of the duties of such department in performing services for COUNTY Such services or functions shall be performed at the times and under circumstances which do not interfere with the perform- ance of regular COUNTY operations. 7. No service shall be performed hereunder unless CITY shall have available funds previously appropriated to cover the costs thereof 8 All persons employed in the perform-ice of such services i,nd functions for CITY shall be COUNTY employees, and no CITY employee as such shall be taken over by COUNTY and no person employed hereunder shall have any CITY pension, civil service, or other status or right For the purpose of performing such services and functions, and for the purpose of giving official status to the perform- ante thereof where necessary, every COUNTY officer and employee engaged in performing any such service or function shall be deemed to be an officer or employee of CITY while performing service for CITY within the scope of this agreement :.0 F1 9 CITY shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of ai,y salary, wages, or other compensation to any COUNTY personnel performing services hereunder for CITY, or any liability other than that provided for in this agreement Except as herein otherwise specified, CITY shall not be liable for compensation or indemnity to any COUNTY employee for injury or sickness arising out of his employment 10 CITY shall pay for such set. ..... as are provided under this agreement at rates shown on the attached schedule Said rates for personnel shall to adjusted to reflect current actual cost Attached equipment rates may be rea•Jjusted sent - annually to reflect current operation costs 11. The Transportation Department shall keep a reasonable itemized and detailed work or job record covering the cost of all services performed, including salaries, wages and other compensation for labor, supervision and planning, the reasonable rental value of all County -owned machinery and equal,ment, rental paid for all rented machinery and equipment, together with the costs of an operator thereof and furnished with said machinery or equipment, the cost of all machinery and supplies furnished by COUNTY, reasonable handling charges, and ail additional items of expense, incidental to the performance of such functions or service 12 All work done hereunder is subject to the limitations of the provisions of Section 23000 of the Government Code, and in accordance therewith, before any work is done or services _ rendered pursuant hereto, an amount equal to the cost or an amount 10: in excess of the estimated cost must be reserved by CITY from its funds to insure pay,ten t for work, services or nartertals provided hereunder The Transportation Department shall render to CITY within 30 days after the close of each calendar month an itemized invoice which covers all services performed during said month, and CITY shall pay COUNTY therefore within thirty (30) days after receipt of such invoice If such payment is not received by COUNTY within 30 days after the date of the invoice, the COUNTY is entitled to recover interest thereon. Said interest -4- 5 Shall be at the rate of one -half (,,) of one (1) percent iier calendar nonth or any purti.,n thereof calculated from the last day of the month 'in which the services were performed If such payment is not received by 'he COUNTY at the office which is described on said invoice within thirty (30) days after the date of the invoice. the COUNTY may satisfy such indebtedness, including interest therenn, from any funds of the CITY on deposit with the COUNTY without giving further notice to CITY of COUNTY'S intention to do so Notwithstanding anything in this naraqraph to the contrary. COUNTY may hill CITY for the entire cost of any specific project at the completion thereof, and such cost will be paid within a reasonable time thereafter The words "specific Project" as used herein shall include, but shall not be limited to, all construction, reconstruction, relocation and other similar capital projects within the road rights of way. 13. if, at the termination of this agreement, COUIITY has on hand any unexpended CITY funds which is in excess of any obligation of CITY to COUNTY for the performance of such functions by said Road Commissioner, any such excess shall thereupo,i be Paid to CITY by COUNTY. This contract shall have an effective date of 19 TB —Julys , and unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, this agreement shall run for a period ending June 30 , 1979, and at the option of the City Council of CITY, with the consent of the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY, shall be renewable for successive periods of not to exceed three (3) years each In the event CITY wishes to renew this agreenent for any succeeding three -year period or less. the City Council, not later than December 31 next Preceding the expiration of this agreement, shall notify the Board of Supervisors of COUNTY that it wishes to renew the sama, whereupon said Board Of Supervisors, not later than the last day of January, shall notify City Council in writing of its willingness to accept such renewal for an additional three -year period or such other term as it deems advisable, otherwise such agreement shall finally terminate at the end of such three -year period. -5- ,y. Notwithstanding the provisions of this oaragraph hereinhefore set forth, either party may terminate this agreement upon notice in writing to the other party of not less than four calendar months prior to the date of such termination LAOUR IOITES III EFFECT 6 -30 -78 Classiflcatlon_ District Road Supervisor Haintenance R Construction Supervisor 11 Cquipment Operator III Equipment Operator 11 Equiprent Operator I ttaintenance 1. Construction Worker I Tree Crew Supervisor Tree Trimmer 0 Oasis Ilourly Rate . R ange $7 94 - $9 66 6 86 - 8.34 5 93 - 7.20 5.50 - 6.68 5 00 - 607 4 32 - 5.24 6 22 - 756 5 78 - 7 03 'Labor rates are subjec' to a payroll overhead mirk up to cover cost of vacation, sick leave, ury duty, workmen's compensation, etc in effect on June 30, 1978, is 53; This rate is subject to ch The rate ange from time to time to reflect actual costs 9 is }l 3� EpUIP11CNT RATES IN EFFECT 6 -30 -70 0 Type of Equipment Range of Hourly Rental Rate Patch truck S 5 50 Hoist track with tree crew 7 30 Aerial tower truck 13.00 Weed spray truck 10 00 - 12.00 Oil spreader truck 20.00 Compressor truck 6 00 Water truck 12.00 - 17.00 Dump trucks 8 50 - 18.20 Low bed tractor trailer 22.35 Tailgate sand :.preaders 2 50 Back hoe 11.00 Gradall 17 50 Loader 10.00 - 19 00 Dozers 17.90 - 29.80 Motorgraders 10 00 - 20.00 Brush chipper 6 00 Tumbleweed chopper 12 00 Steel wheel roller 5 00 - 12 85 Self-propelled neuriatic roller 10 65 Tractor broom 12 50 Street sweeper 33.00 Air compressor 4.20 Chain saw I po Mobile crane 2C.25 'Equipment rates are marked up to cover administrative costs. The mark up rate is currently 13:. il. d" iN WITNESS WHEREOF, the CITY OF RANOIO CUCAMONGA by resolution duly adopted by its City Council caused this agreement to be signed by its Wyor and attested by its Clerk, and the COUNTY OF SAN BEMARDINO, by order of its Board of Supervisors, has caused these presents to be sub- scribed by the Chairman of said Board and the seal of said Board to be affixed thereto and attested by the Clerk of said Board, all on the day and year first above written. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO + Chairman, Buafd of Supervlxus Dated ATTESTED CITY OF RAHCIIO CUCAMONGA (SfJ(C II [W[WpMJIg1Ai *July t.~ SVnaru.rl d s July 10, 1978 I Title Na.yor Clark of the Board of Sulwtvlsors Address 9140 Eaeelina, Rancho Cucamonga, CA ATTEST /ajj� e/ C ty Cjer Ammmnl a In Ii +W Inun nr'P l at to h,.h,t e,mrnllamm � e CamntY G„ntMi Ge,nir MmvvmuPlwC 011ne eM17 el 7 I . .wk a \,.y r ia"+JL: %�' :a s�ti� �v :5.i . ''1. ;.F'� .' - _ . '. " „t: + � •'g ; ;, .,,� � to CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 14FMORANDUM DATES December 20, 1978 TO: City Manager and City Council FROMt Llovd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: RECONSTRUCTION OF BASELINE STREET Attached for Council eaecutlon Is a resolution designating Baseline Street as County mmintained road for the duration of the construction project involving the widening of Baseline Street from Archibald Avenue to 60O feet west of Hellman Avenue and the widening of Hellman Avenue from 300 feet north and South of the intersection of Baseline and Hellman. This action is required by State Law and Is similar to that taken in September for the signals at Baseline and Foothill Boulevard and San Berne.rdino Road. This proj struct a scheduled advartiso by n d be undr i ntowarde heendofApril. Noconvtructionwill beallowedeOncHellman Avenue until Hay 1, 1980. Respectfully e,matted, � }0NE� � City Engineer Li:deb 0 0 RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY F RANCHO CUCANONO BERNARDINO COUNTY TO UCONSTRUCT BASELINE STREET FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HELL`IAN AVENUE. WHEREAS, the project for widening and reconstruction of Baseline Street from Archibald Avenue to Ilellm 1 Avenue was Included In the San Bernardino County Road Budget at the time of incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City and County have agreed that the project should be completed by the County In the erne manor as originally planned; and WHEREAS, State Law ptovideo for the acceptance of City streets into the County Road System for purioses of construction (to comply with requirements that County Road funds b., spent solely on the County Road System); and WHEREAS, upon completion of the construction it will be appropriate for the City to resume all maintenance responsibilit.y. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Citv Council of the Cltv of Rancho arranze for and facil administer the in¢ Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council consents to designation of Baeollne Street from 600 feet west of Hellman Avenue to the centerline Archibald Avenue Hellman as north south Of the of award Intersection I contract to acceotance of the contract as comolete; and BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that upon acceptance of the contract as complete by the County Board of Supervisors, Baseline Street and Hellman Avenue shall automatically res revert to City street during the construction tperiod nshall became nthe eresponsibllltyyofs thee City the County , PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 20th day of December, 1775. Mayor Rancho Cueamonga ATTEST; City Clerk l7 a CITE 07 RADCtto cDCµ10NCA lino ROUN December 20. 1978 Date: Council and City ltana8er meat City cotmunttY Se DOZT vI$IvB •Co: RO 78_25 7yito cu A CQ,YApli Jack 1nm• Director of prom: R.010no, C1TY OF RpRCYtO CUCPitO ^ Sub)ecc: FEEL aSOw.C104 FOR TItE No. 79-25 shop ee t. ayopced Rosf°i{ya°pcho Cucaeo "oo' hou A. Council city naichet the Ylaoi Chef° gfncas City T.he June 21 sea 191 . Yee a, edola vas he ad Many , ou established. a time msy °r May t C CoWel+n the loci City vere that Rcao a t the ice re a fees vhtch art rent of Count to pruposin6° beccer snElect ecun_ ac Butlit 9 £unecions ch as red "because _ to tee St. c el r a ad) aOt tad YCL6 'eve s o r a ecs may b e rese 2[t Collect bar0n9s three heVe met the. net tnrtotgoafration of ch ed -ould 'ever the Ctly• a m0 beccer fee, the city occurvini 1n t of all the build - ueli a9 Vall as to onYchi:rJ contain needs as face ae vbatsoever a sti 1 ulitsen section code. Elictl++8b�r in6 lbes Bulldin8 have no the Raooluti through The Intern or revision to section' 1• per the Uniform that 1s, [ions °s Eiservicel Code. fa8 C0 scion do for The first m') fees: Sn8 and safn.i;lnB permits Code and tiori deaveloPs the untfonn Eigureo to, rnnev lot tiechanteal Co gut Plus din8 Ogee YOecn Yer�lBThe o °volustionit have nOt reel aix bing Is bet at act Conference Californiu 79 coda di io ff ic0tta+ vas m�elderabldy vill be the State eE the uric 69 YeRts. increased con eeton 1n a odoPred thSa fee schedule d, OPt ch itse '009 in t 5 traction City Council W- b, eerie^ c chanBed i° °bout o�be t C.B.O. h•' es the o fees )usced 0 the cursans cos Scoff osB that three ad fees yeats ago Su the 1979 �souary i. a the butldS.I °es are eleetLieal plan 79 f . 1'� - va to since lunbin8 and A Btadin8 4 forchrPa�lca: sifter' nlcal, P fees, moditi'a dace Putchermo the mectV ti• the batldinB oa of that eat corAtttons. tatenc in8 and eu ,e l �,Aif tad cone 1.9.1) • the Y1eMDS, petmtt. reflect bCea added (SeceS0 relative Ceodicional should alfen has all fees era: (addition)• chccktnB 2 14 p¢r coo 1y to modified S ¢cif is Yisn toeessin8 through rntal set Ra orts P toar. of V Section 2Ut this section. the telleet the ea fees 'to and cedi 1 °a0rdat to beccer the" 399% A wo" l� Memorandum - Renolution Nu. 78 -25 December 20, 1:18 Page 2 Sections 3.0 through 3.2 concerns the fees relative to subdivisions and engineering Inspection. There has been an addition of: street vacation requests and removal of Notice of Violation, and a modification of the engineering len- checkin fees from lhZ to 24% The additional fees would cover the processes that were overlooked when the first Resolution was adopted and the plan checking fee is modified to better reflect the cost of providing plan - checking services. These services as the Council will recall are being performed by Engineering Consultants since the City has no plan checking staff. The 2fii is inly intended to cover the wet of the consultants review. The ly% currently does not. The advantog!s of having Engineering Consultants aerfom the engineering plan -check are speed and professional quality review. The other remaining portions of the Resolution are not modified except for changes in the section numbers to better organize the resolution Non appur- tenant lees such as mobile home park fees ha ✓e been eliminated since these fees have no relationship to Rancho Cucamonga. (The County had these fees_ - because the County performed Inspections of mobile home parks. Since the City does not have ronponsibility for that there is no need for these fees). In summer). Staff recommends that the fee resolution be modified to better reflect current conditions of valuations of construction as well as modifica- time to better meet the current needs of the City. Res1peetf 1 y submitted, J 'JACK LAY, Dir ct Community Development JL: nm Attachments: Resolution 1.0 1.1. i 0 RESOLUTION NO A RCSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION 110. 78 -25 ESTABLISHING A C014PRFJIENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE Building Perol: Fees: A tee for each building permit or service shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following schedule of Fees: Total Valuation of Work $ 1.00 - 2,000 00 $ 2,001 00 to 25,000 00 $ 25,001.00 to 50,000 00 $ 50,00,00 to 100,000.00 $ 100,001.00 and up Plan Checking Fee Fees $17 50 for the first $1,000,00 valuation plus $1.50 for each additional $100.00 valuation or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000 00 valuation 32.SO for the first $2.000.00 plus $6.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00 $170 50 for the first $25,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000 00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $292.00 for the first $50,000 00 plus $3 00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to mid including $100,000.00 $433.00 for the first $100,000.00 plus $2 50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. When the valuation of proposed construction exceeds one thousand dollars, and a plan is required to be submitted, a plan checking fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of submittal of plans. Said Afar checking fee shall be equal to seventy -five percent (75%) of the building permit fee as set forth In Section 1 0. Additional Plan Checking made necessary by changes in plans or incomplete plan submisstion, $20 00 per hour for the estimated time of checking re- visions 1.2. Conpliance Inspections Inspections to determine compliance of existing construction with applicable codes when not included in an active, valid building permit,) or inspections made necessary due to work not being ready at time specif!ed, or work not corrected after prior written correction notice .. .... .......... .$20 00 1.3. Change of Occupancy Change of Occupany Inspection .... ... .. .. ...... ... .. ...$25 00 1 4 Relocated Buildings Fees for inspection of a structure to relocate into or within the City, shall be $50 00 when located within 25 miles of City offices, plus $2,00 per mile in excess of 25 miles distance when located in excess of 25 miles from City offices 1.5 Appeal of Abatement Notice An appeal of a notice to abate a substandard or danferous building... 350.09 1,6 Mechanical Permits A fce for each mechanical permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schtdule of Feesf la .,5 2 4, For the issuance of each permit .. .. .. . .................. .......E 7.00 .a For the installation or relocation of each forced air or gravity type furnaco or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appli- ance, up and including 100,000 Btu /hr ... •.• .......... ... .. ....... 6 00 For the installation or relocation of each forced -air or gravity type furnance or burner, including ducts and vents attached to such appli- ance over 100,000 Btu /hr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 For the installation or relocation of each floor furance, including vent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 00 1 For the installatinn or relocation of each suspended heater, re- cessed wall heater or floor mounted unit heater . . 6.00 For the installation, relocation or replacement of each appliance vent installed and not included In an appliance permit . . . . . . . . 6.00 For the repair of, alteration of, or addition to each heating appli- once, refrigeration unit, cooling unit, absorption unit, or each heating, cooling, absorption, or evaporation cooling system, including installation of controls regulated by the Code . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,00 i For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor to and Including three horsepowur, or each absorption sytem to and including 100,000 Btu /hr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over three horsepower to and including 25 horsepower, or each absorption Z system over 100,000 Btu /hr to and including 1,000,000 Btu /hr .10 00 ' For the installation or relocation of each boiler or compressor over t 15 horsepower to and including 30 horsepower, or each absorption sys- tern over 1,000,000 Btu /hr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20.UO For the installation or relocation of ouch boiler or compressor over ' 30 horsepower to and including 50 horsepower, or for each absorption ' system over 1,000,000 Btu /hr to and including 1.750,000 Btu /hr . . . .30.00 For the installation or relocation of each boiler or refrigeration compressor over 50 horsepower, or each absorption system over 1,750,000 Btu /hr . . . . . . . . . . . . AQ,00 i lot each air handling unit to and including 10,000 cubic feet per minute, indluding ducts attached thereto . . . . . . . 6 00 NOTE: This fee shall not apply to an air handling unit which is a portion of a factory assembled appliance, cooling unit, evaporative cooler or absorption unit for which a permit is required elsewhere in this Code For each air handling unit over 10,000 cfm . . . . • • • . . . . . 10,00 For each evaporative cooler other than portable type . . . . . . . . . 6.00 For each ventilation fan connected to a single duct . . . . . . . . 4.00 For each ventilation system which is not a portion of any heating or air conditioning system authorized by a permit . . . . . . . . . . 9.00 For each alteration to a duct system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 For each commercial spray booth . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10.00 For the Snstallattun of each hoed which is served by mechanical exhaust. including the duct: of such hood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.00 For the installation or relocation of each domestic type Incinerator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S.00 For the installation or relocation of each commercial or industrial type Incinerator . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 20.00 For each appliance or piece of equipment regulated by this Code but not classes in other appliance categories, or for which no other fee is listed in this Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00 1.6.1, Additional inspections Where additional inspections are made necessary due to work not being ready at the time specified or due to work not corrected la .,5 1, 5�:..�,` ��'..ypy_�.Y�i: ;Fga-�.:. c'.,, °i :,r -_.. . -_ -:- - • — -,- :.- - - -, __ �!1 after prior written correction notice, an additional fee of $20,00 > may be required by the Building Official prior to reinspection, 1,6,2 Mechanical Plan Checking Fees When plans are required a plan checking fee equal to 75% of the permit fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time of plan submission, 1 7 Electrical Permit Fees A fee for each electrical permit shall be paid to the Building Official . as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees: Permit Issuance Fee for each permit issued 7.00 Services: For service of 600 V or less and not over 200 amps, in rating, including 1 meter, each 10,00 For services of 600 V or less and over 200 amps. to 1,000 amps, in rating, including 1 meter, each 25,00 For services over 600 V or over 1,000 amps in rating, Including 1 meter, each 50.00 For each additional meter S 00 New Residential Building . In addition to the fees for permit issuance and services as outlined in, Permit Issuance Fee and Services: For new, single, duplex, and multiple family dwelling for each square foot of gross floor area .01 For buildings accessory to new residential buildings con. strutted in conjunction with those residential buildings for each square foot of gross floor area ,005 Other Construction - IN addition to the fees for permit issuance and services oulined above, fees for residential additions and alterations and other buildings shall be as followst Outlets and Fixtures _ For receptacle, switch, lighting outlets, first 20 each So Additional, each 130 For lighting fixtures, sockets, or other lamp devices, first 20, each ,50 Additional fixtures, each .30 For pole or platform mounted lighting fixtures, etch .50 For theatrical. type lighting fixtures or assemblies, each .50 For fixed residential appliances not exceeding 1 HP, each 2 00 NOTEi For other types of air conditioners and other motor driven appliances having larger electrical ratings, > see power apparatus, For fixed factgry w ?red non - residential appliances not exceeding 1 tip, KW or KVA, each 2 00 NOTC•r For other types of air conditioners and other motor driven appliance having larger electrical ratings, see power apparatus, Power Apparatus For motors, generators, transformers, rectifiers, converters, capacitors, Industrial heating, air conditioners, and heat r, pumps, cooking or baking equipment, end other apparatus, as follows: Rating in lip, KN, KVA, or KVAR 2.50 Up to and including 1, each Over 1 and not over 10, each 5.00 Over 10 and not over S0, each 12.:0 Over 50 and net over 100, each 25,00 V t` • -4- • Over 103, each 40.00 NOTE: For equipment or appliance, hav!ng more than ene motor, transformer, heater, etc., the sum of the combined ratings may be used. NOTE: These fees include all switches, circuit breakers; contactors, thermostats, relays and other directly related control equipnent Busways ✓r�4 Z For trolley and ylue -in tune bustmvs, each 100 feet or fraction ther•cof 3.00 NOTE: M additional !ac will be required for lighting fixtures, motors, and other appliances that are connected to tro!ley and plug -in type busways No fee is required for portable tools. Signs Signs, outline lighting and marquees For one sign and one branch circuit, each 10.00 For additional branch circuits, each 2 00 Carnivals and Circuses For electric generators and electrically driven rides, each 10.00 For mechanically driven rides and walk- through attractions with lighting, each 3.00 For area and booth lighting, each 3 00 For permanently installed rides, booths, displays and attractions, use ItNIT FEE SCHEEDULE Temporary Power For temporary service pole or pedestal and appurtenances, each 10.00 For a temporary distribution system for construction sites, decorative lighting, Christmas tree sales lots, fireworks _ stands, sales booths, etc., each S 00 Miscellaneous For miscellaneous conduits and conductors 15,00 For swimming pools, each 20,00 Has S7"1.,g pool fac ir.clu.c: p; .p notara, intogral lighting fixtures, and all wiring and outlets necessary for operation of same. For additional electrical outlets or equipment, see UNIT FEE SCHEDULE above. 1.7.1 Other Inspections For an extra inspection made necessary due to work not being ready at the time spzcified or duo to work not corrected after prior written notice, each 20,00 For inspection of electrical equipment for which no fee 1s herein set :orth and for emergency inspections for the time cons mee per hour 20,00 i,tth a minimum charge for Is hour or less 10,00 1,7,2, Electrical Plan Checking Fees When service switch size a =ceeds 400 amperes or 300 volts or when connected load exceeds 400 amperes, a plan checking fee equal to 75% of the electrical permit fee shall be paid to the Building Official at the time plans are submitted for checking, 1,7,3, Annual Electrical HaintenOnce ro;oit 2S,OO lb7 1.8 1 9 Plumbing Permits A fee for each plumbing permit shall be paid to the Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule, of Fees; Permit Issuance Fee for each permit issued 7 00 For each plumbing fixture or trap or set of fixtures on one trap (including water, drainage piping and backflow protection there- fore) 3 50 Rainwater systems enclosed within building structure /per drain 3.50 For each Cesspool, seepage pit or supplemental leach line system 11.00 For each private sewage disposal system 22.00 For each building sewer 10.00 For each water heater and /or vent 3.50 For each gas piping system of one (1) to five (5) outlets 3.50 For each gas piping system of six (6) or more, per outlet .70 For each industrial waste pre - treatment interceptor, including its trap and vent, excepting kitchen type grease interceptors function= ing as fixture traps 5.00 For installation, alteration or repair of water piping and /or water treatment equipment 3 50 For repair or alteration of drainage or vent piping 3 50 For each lawn sprinkler system on any one meter including backflow protection devices on tanks, vats, etc., one (1) to five (5) 3.50 For vacuum breakers or backflow protective devices on tanks, vats, etc , one (1) to five (S) 3.50 Over five (5), each ,70 For swimming pool piping, including water supply piping, backflow prevention devices, drainage piping, b,.t excluding pool water heaters or gas piping _ .10 00 1 8 1 Additional Inspections Where additional inspections are made necessary due to work not being ready at t',e time specified or due to work not corrected after prior written correction notice,, an additional fee of $20 00 may be required by the Building Official prior to re- inspection. 1 8.2 Plumbing Plan Checking Fees When plans are required a plan checking fee equal to 7Ft of the Plumbing permit fee shall be paid to the Building official at the time plans are submitted for plan checking. Grading Permit Fees A fee for each grading permit shall be paid totthe Building Official as set forth in the following Schedule of Fees, Quantity of Cut and Fill Fee 50 Cubic yards or less $ 20.00 50 to 100 cubic yards 25 00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards 100 cubic yards plus $7.00 for each add- itional 100 cubic yds. or fraction there. of 25.00 I,001 to 10.000 cubic yards for the first 1,000 cubic yards, plus $6.00 for each additional :0,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof 88.00 ( V %:1c.. `yi!„ '�•W: rYv -0 r Y� °a'?1�1�^�ira a -, .�i . -� x._- -_ r .. -.. � •� b. ;,- y -'i -6- '3 Quantity of Cut and Fill Fee 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards or the first 10,000 cubic yards plus $27.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof, $142 00 100,001 cubic yards or mare for the first 100,000 cubic yards plus $1S.00 for each additional 10,000 cubic yards or fraction thereof. 385.00 1.9 1. Grading Plan Checking Fees A grading plan checking fee it accordance with the following schedule shall be paid: Quantity of Cut and Fill Fee 50 -100 yards $ 50,00 101 -500 yards 100 00 S01 -1,000 yards 200.00 1,001 -2,000 yards 250 00 - 2,001 -3,000 yards 300.00 3,001 -4,000 yards 350,00 4,001 -5,000 yards 400,00 5,001 -end up 450.00 The sum of cut and fill yardages shall be used in computing grading permit and plan checking fees. 2.0 PW7`TING REVIEW FEES 2.1 Site Approval $ 300 00 2.2 Director Review 2.2 1 Site development review 200.00 2.2.2 Signs, additions, alterations 25.00 2.2.3 Coordinated uniform, sign programs 75.00 2.3 Conditional Use Permit ;W 300.00 -- 2.4 Temporary Occupancy Permit pee 25.00 2 4.1 Sales Office Cash Deposit 2,000.00 2 4 2 On -site subdivision sign cash deposit on sign 500.00 2 4.3 Off -sita subdivf%.on signs cash deposit for all signs Soo 00 2 5 planned Unit Development 1,000.00 2 6 Hinor Deviation 50.00 2.7 Variance 200.00 2.8 Zone Change 500.00 + 25.00 /ne 2 9 General Plan Amendment 1,000.00 2.10 Specific Plan 1,000.00 2.11 Temporary Construction Office 100.00 2 12 Environmental Assessment 70.00 �+ 2.13 Environmental Impact Report Actual cost plus 20% g; 2.14 Appeals 4 2 14 1 Appeal of a Director decision 50.00 2.14 2 Appeal of a Plannirg Commission Decision 100.00 /14 ,a -7 • 5UBDNISIONS. PARCEL. MAPS. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS IMPROVEMENT PLANS. PUBLIC f70RC INSPECTION PEES 3.1 Applications 3.1.1 Tentative Tract Piling Pee $ 500.00 + 25.00 /lot 3.1.2 Tentative Parcel Map 150 no 3 1.3 Parcel Map Waiver 150.00 3.1.4 r' Lot Line Adjustments 150.00 3 1 5 ' Certificate of compliance 150.00 3.1 6 Revert subdivided land to acreage 50 00'+ 1.00 /acre y 3 1.7 Tentative Tract Map Appeal 200.00 3.1.8 Parcel Map Appeal 100 00 3.1.9 Tentative Map Extension Request 50 00 3.1.10 Subdivision Agreement Time Extension 200.00 r� 3.1.11 Street Vacation requests 100.00 3.1.12 Removal of Notice of Violation 100.00 3.2 Plan Checking Fees 3.2 1 Final Map checking Fee $ 500.00 + 25 00 /lot or actual coat + 202, 3.2 2 Parcel Map shacking fee whichever is greater. 250.00 + 15.00 /lot or actual coat + 202, 3 2.3 Improvement Plan Checking fee 2y perch percen is greater, ent of estimated improvement cost or actual coat + 205 whichever is greater, 3.2.4 Engineering Inepoction Fee 5% of improvement cost to $25,000 - 411T of lmprovment coat next $75,000 42 of improvement cost over ,^100,000 4 0 Moving Buildings and other extra Legal Loads (T) -- 4.1 Howie Moving and Transportation Deposit: Uforc iss,.ing the transportation permit, the Citif Engineer shall require of the applicant a deposit of a sum of money equal to twice the amount of the estimated expense to Indemnify the City for such expenses, as well as against any loss or damage which the City may sustain by reason of damage or injury to any street, sidewalk, fire hydrant or other property of the City Such deposlt shall not be less than $500 00 or a Certificate of Insurance on .file in the office of the City Engineer 4 2 House Moving Permit: A fee for four (4) sections are subject to permit fee of $25.00 per caravan shall be paid by the applicant uho applies for a house moving permit 4.3 Wide Loads: Less than fourteen (14) feet - $3.00 per truck. Fourteen (14) feet and more - $10 00 per truck. 4.4 Annual Permits: For loads not core than fourteen (14) feet - $25 00 per truck per year (any route). I J0 • -8- • 5.0 Repair or Emergency Work. and Scheduled Jobe (P) — 5.1 Repair or Emergency Work by City: Work accompliahed by the City to repair facilities damaged by a Contractor, agency or other party and other emergency work shall be charged for in accordance with the following schedule: 5 1.1 When work Is accomplished by o Contractor engaged by the City, the charges shall be there established in the contract by: (a) Formal bid procedure, (b) Informal bid procedure, (c) Purchase Order, plus administrative costs in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the basic charge. When emergency repairs are necessitated due to damage to City facilities by a Contractor. City crews will be utilized and charged at the then prevailing per d'® wage rate as _ astablished by the department of employment for this area 5 1.2 When scheduled or mutual aid work is accomplished by City crews utilizing city equipment, the basic charge shall b. computed on a time required basis during normal working hours. Labor charges exceeding the normal working hours will be charged at time and a half (lh times the labor rates listed below): labor Rates Maintenance Worker I $6.25 per hour Maintenance Worker II $7.00 per hour Equipment Operator $7.50 per hour Equipment Mechanic $8.00 per hour Lead Operator $8.00 per hour Field Supervisor $9.00 per hour 6 0 Miscellaneous Fees 6.1 Returned Check Charge: A charge of ten dollars ($10) will be made for all checked returned by the customer's bank for non- sufficient funds or because the account has been closed. 6.2 Penalty for Failure to Pay License Fee: A penalty of 101 per month of the license fee due shall be paid for failure to pay a license fee within 30 days after the same shall become due. Maximum penalty 502 of license fee. The City shall collect in addition to the penalty due any costs incurred by the necessity to file suit for collection in the Courts. 6.3 Replacement for teat or Destroyed License: A fee of $5.On shall be paid for the replacement of lost or destroyed licensee. 7.0 Fee for Community Beautification: Community Beautification fees shall be as follows: 7.1 For each single family structure and multi - family structure or In a hotel, motel, or dormitory, 20 cents per square foot of gross building area under roof, or two hundred doolIars per cacb- Melling unit, which- ever ib the greater total sum. a -9- • A ' 7.2 For each addition to a dwelling unit In a single family condominium, apartment, duplex, or mul tlple- dwelling structure, or in a hotel or dotmitury, which addition consists of 650 square feet or more under roof, or which addition creates an additional duelling unit, 20 cents per square foot of greas building area under roof, or two hundred dollars per each dwelling unit, whichever is the greater total am. 7.3 For rash trailer apace, two hundred dollars with no additional am for any directly accessory structure. 9 8.0 Cost of Living Increase: 7ft Planning Pees and Subdivision fees and the au ficgo n fee shall be subject to an annual coat of livi o ng a aed on the Los Angeles /tong Beach consumer price ia•sz. for purposes of computation, the twelve month period shall be from Marsh to Nnreh, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this - DAY OF , 1978. ATTEST: CITY CLERK MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ..,;1,a,. Copy System Memo Page 2 Productivity A very important consideration in achieving efficiency of operation is productivity. By comparison of the IBM and Xerox we have the £ollowiag: IBM Xerox Copies per hour 4366 Copies per minute 75 45 Pirst copy speed 4.5 sec. 7.0 sec. Subsequent copy speed .0 sec. 1.2 sec. We were able to compare one of our repetitious procedures between the way we do it now and the way it would be done on the IBM III. Current processing time took 54 minutes, the IBM III allowed us to do the same process in 10 minutes. A savings of 36 minutes. There is no need to explain what this could mean in the long run of savings and productivity. Simplicity of Maintenance IB11 has eliminated the need for a key operator to clear jams. They now have a system that allows the user to clear paper jams, therefore only one person is involved and this eliminates another person being distracted from their job. Xerox does not have this feature and requires a key operator. Cost Cost/ Toner 6 Equipment Volume Month Dev. Cost Total Cost /Month IBM III 15000 687.17 22.05 700.22 Xerox 5400 15000 G25.00 62.10 687.10 At this point it is important to realize, even though the Xerox is less per month, it is not as fast as an IBM nor is the duplexing automatic for our needs as the IBM is. Features that far oat weigh the $13.00 + cost variance. lKb($o4Yc�+ faollnwing: (1) Re lace the Xern 107 with an a Ile will then have the IIIM IZ or u i 1ty copy ng an t e IDN Iii for production work. This procedure will result in a $160 /month increase over what we pay now. However, an analysis of staff acitivities has shown that an actual increase of only $9.00 /month will result. �s r. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Council, City Manager L PROM: Harry Empey - Finance Director SUBJECT: Copy System Recently IBM Corporation re- introduced their Copier I1 at a much lower lease price than before. We had an opportunity to see a demonstration of the IBM III copier, and the machine was very impressive. The following features were of major importance in evaluating the IBM III and the Xerox 5400. • Duplexing (two -sided copying) • Consistent copy quality • Simplicity of use • Versatility • Productivity • Simplicity of maintenance • cost Duplexing IBM III has automatic two sided copying by utilizing a third tray which eliminates the need to adjust trays and remove paper, such as you will find in the Xerox 5400. This procedure is very time con- suming and irritatinc. With our current demand on copier use it it, necessary to reduce stand around time at the machine. The IBM III appears to achieve this very nicely. Two side copying by itself hav the potential to save on filing space (up to 50%). Postal savings can be achieved by sending one or two sheets duplexed as opposed to three or four. Consistent Copy uallty IBM has a self advancing photo conductor which gives a totally new surface every 15,000 copies. The Xerox has a drum which is polished when copies become poor= however, the quality continues to deteriorate over a period of time even after each polishing. Simplicity of Use Both machines are relatively simple to operate. All push button controls on both machines. Both will automatically clear selections if person using machine fails to do so and walks away. Versatility ', Both on a par, with IBM maintaining range of copy quality longer than Xerox. (Personal Opinion) lm J tF - - _ Ei r 'T 7 \• r\ _ - T � i A ; ^: U �e z E i - _ • L • _ 3. � � - L � y _ � _ _ L _ _ _ _ _ _ - .,, t.tt_, y;, 1 i•�•• i A •�B tisl_.t$; . Fti [ V � rn��+ee�s„°^i�v�rn � t m° E z e 'i '^ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a Ml .3• � =3 4Af� c� �S f b E� <F �n �+�y �cli r�i c•c3 3���, I c < °� �° o.'a ��• }��'�.•'g��?Z n3CnE2 "Q, _:�� oZ 'b EP�d C�� ��5•m °G =�� '< 'F•'-oo gA 'mU FO G� R5'�•�^ 'O i+A C. stn a 4� "5� •e �+ �•£° .f CC �-' Gun t7� SG -7S �if v� u^. L+o3 f4i ,a. .',y O -!•e o ,o'E�. 9, eo� °•'�Qw u _$ � o=�n i � N s � Fe .t I I i ^ G l A" tni a6a O<< '$�c =•'-'G ICnm-- '•Aa3� 4�'�s.25A3� I; =�=p'a c.•$3 5r•�I�Ra•so� @�e'a,�7' <q 'r ��m� ;$ "s- ��m � ° =a� <5g� ° —�� Is�eg�� ^ „- a � Nod•. a, � -enc'3 •0 ,�° ?• ! Cr2I ° ° :3 a viii o S�G a & &�E a a -,4 -c. •°y -3 T` o�Zo afi 3 .15 A5■ �a'�, ^Sd�S FEET nP��. .^I�.0 f~7 "y'_a4c5c�wiiG55''o�i3no = "r 5< Z g •� Mk'w r 3� ve 5' 3 Z a."< '` g•ne S$ O •SA Eli" m ”' ?S gO O •Qe 5:�51 Lr EE-.9 �ca z�s'rs� g � f�ggg �2zss�s n2��s r,�9a�eu3's"�KS: S� 4og. ���••..gg8 R�So'> 'n �,2 _ <3.�5�� �,i X��> �'m.��,3� o ��Fn,efffF Sxe'��L'•eo Y �5 to m h5•Z�, 3 e"4?,= „55•r� � L^^ g, go sgo 2� '$Qo � 9 Qgg3 ^o •' ri .� ".(!�i ,�� -3 ' ='��'n%X•` . °'tr.a F�`. �• LS•rt�U_"2•'e $_. c,�-' 3�_� OR ALLAN H. MAWHINNEY Records Management Consultant 27 Redwood Tree Lane, IMne California 92715 (714)552.095 Beverly Authelot City Clerk 9320 Base Line, Suite C Ram_ho Cucamonga, CA Dear Beverly, Thank you very mach for allowing me nice of you to give me so much time It be an important step to take for future the following office files: City Clark, and Safety, and Community Development November 20, 1978 to survey the City records. It was soma that we agree that this will purposes With your help I inspected Finance, Community Services, Building It is understood that these are all relatively new files - with the exception of those "donated" by the County. however, it appears that there is a rapid increase of documentation of all types. The new filing cabinets coming to house them will be just' in time. If I understand it correctly you prefer to furnish the labor to actually type new labels and otherwise prepare any other materials. I am to cuperviea and direct what information coos on to these materials and Ste Proper_plaeeme such as labels, folders, etc, Both Stan Gordon and I agree that the more direct contest the clerical personnel have with the development of a good Records Management Program the better the chance of success Our encouragement of your staff actually dosing the work will certainly help in the feeling of propietorship on the part of City personae' This is as It should be. Nov on to come specifics in my proposal I am ready to furnish any or all of the following sonless: 1 A complete change of all files to the MIFF System. I assume you are already familiar with St. You mentioned this at one point but let me know if you need more details; 2. A Computerised Master Index to the MOFF System files produced This differs slightly from other indexes but is xery accurate and will be listed two ways - Alphabetically and numerically for cross reference purposes; 3. A Coeputerizad Index of the Ordinancen, Resolutions and Minutes A aample reduced print -out by subject is attached. This is a real one produced for use by the City of Irvine and is used on a daily basic This particular one does not have the Minutes incorporated but will give you an idea of the super poasi- bilities for research purposes; 4 In -house training of clerical personnel to properly maintain the system in my absence; and A continuous monitoring of the program on a mnthly basis and availability by telephone at other tires This will include continua advise concerning timely preparation for growth of the files, microfilming and equlpnent plus continuous update of the computerized Indexes both the MIYFF Master and the City Clerk Index For the complete package as detailed on page 1 the coat wil• be $1,575 plus $100 per month. The $1,575 charge will be for the complete change, with anti- cipations, of all files, to the HUFF System, a computerized Master Index of the files, a Computerized Index of the existing Resolutions, Ordinances and Minutes no of the date of our agreement, establishment of a Retention Schedule and training of all personnel concerned in the daily operation to continue a good Records Management System. The $100 per month would be for at least 8 hours visit monthly to train new personnel, discuss the program and effect changes keeping things =wing in the proper direction such as budgeting, establishing new files, preparing for a microfilm program, etc. Because of the flucuation of the updating of the Computerized Index, the charge for this service will be in addition to the $100 per month. It probably wont exceed $50 per uonth. The updating volume will depend on the number of Minutes, Ordinances and Resolutions produced and approved. Please let me know if there are any questions If you agree in eaeence with the above let me know and I will be happy to send a draft of an agreement which you can run through your City Attorney Of course, if you have a favorite Consultant Agreement please send it to me for review and quick return. I sincerely hope we can get - together on this project flow is the time for establish the solid groundwork for a complex system that you will need in the very near future Be assured that I will do everything 4n my power and ability -_ to act up a program that will be the envy of other cities and make the City operation more efficient. I would like to invite y j and any others to came and visit my operation In the City of Irvine and see a very active program Sincerely yours, 1L/ I City Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA December 1, 197E Alan H. Havhinney Records Management Consultant 27 Redwood Tree Lane Irvine, California 92715 Dear Alan: Us have received your proposal, acd I have discussed this with our City ' Hanager. Lauren Hgsserman He would llke to receive a revised proposal to Include the following services only: 1. A complete change of all files to the HUFF System. 2 In-house training of clerical personnel to properly main- tain the system. Although we all agree to the benefits of the computerized Indexes, it 1s felt that because of financial limitations we could waft on these Stems. The same is true for the monthly monitoring of the program. Perhaps at a later time we will change our minds, especially after we get Into the pro - Brea. You are correc, that we wish to furnish the labor o- typing new label, and preparing any ether necessary materials in setting up the files We will also provide roe necessary equipment to Include such Stems as labels, folders, etc. Once I have received this proposal, it will be presented to the City Council for approval. I look forward to hearing from you Sincerely, Beverly Authelet Administratl.•e Secretary be POST OFFIC'S BOX 791. ALLAN H. MAWHINNEY Records Management Consultant 27 Redwood Tree Lane, Imne. California 92715 (714) 552.0395 Beverly Aurhelat Adwlnistrative Jeeratary City of Rancho Cucamonga PO Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Door Beverly, Decombar 7, 1978 CITY � M AE BCHO C] U G1M A DtlnsrRa nory 01G1 DEC 6 19765 Ara Pit M191101111211 12:801U A Than4 you vary much for your teeter of Deeambdr 1, 1973 Per your instructions f will rovisa my proposal to include: I A complata change of all filds to the HUFF dystuo, 2 In -louse training of clerical parsonndl Lw preparly awlntain the system. My, reyiRej PLUna9a1 to supervise and aonitor tha abova changes is n a in the amount of 91,225._ Of course, as we go along I liapa to Instill good record keeping practices and adeisa those I a.w Li touch with caneernla,, how to prepare now for the future Thure is a let to consider in tha preparation of .. RecdrJa llanagasa:nt Program and I fail tlmt I can help in several ways Records Management is a coopar. tive vunture and this is a great time to get It going at a reasonable expense Cood habita can be followed Just as easy as bad habits Let m: know if I can furnish the Council any othur information It is easier to ansocr ryasLtona th..n to Just e.pnund I am against tha creation of unnecessary documantatlon Jincaraly yours, 09& )1,z" lot. Ry tie, ALLAN H. MAWHINNEY Srcords Management Consultant 27 Redwood Tree Lone. Irvine. California 92715 (7114) 552 0395 GOAL OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT The real goal at Records Management is making the desired information available at the required time at least expense This Elettends solely on the Strength of tho records foundation the retrieval SY51ein The measure of an effective records management piotc,ain is not how much has been discarded how well forms are controlled bowelleotw a data ivaicalent policy there Is, but can a record be produced when needed In addition to an initial aapdct of discarding, retiring or microfilming darn the files must be structured so that weedings are regular scheduled and capable of being performed witficatit a major upheaval A one lime car,, all and cleanout is not the end of the program bar a good be gaining A well structured sort-as-you-gu file systo ncan put tiat burden of data retirement. microfilming and destruction where it belongs — with the clerical stall who operates the files A base must be developed gaining more from the filing staff reducing base lost it, document searches. facilitating file purging and improving Ovitcal morale ty The professional records consultant has always ieculinized that dollar savings are almost equally high whether records are destroyed or stored The object is getting them out of the office It costs about S70 a year to matatain a 1,10 diawar of records at the office For the same period It costs about S3 to keep a Isle drawer of mccaids, in a property erfaipped and designed storage area. Keeping yy these records on mccratilm is considerably loss since a ICLI of nit-, o-film occupies about 4% of the space taken by the original records All records have a Isle cycle Active necoads laaca%e Records. and Obsolete Records Every office manager tecognues this life cycle but records do accumulate because no one wants to move files to microfilm or stmatio because of lack of authority system and equipment to do the job For those organizations that have a need Jr a complete Record., Management Program but do not need, or find desirable & fall lime Records Manager I offer one or all of the following consultant services • Records Retention Schedule • Microfilming • Filing systems Computerized Indexing • Vital Records • In-House-Tratning The training will be accomplished so that clerical personnel can maintain the system For a monthly retainer foe we can visit periodically and keep the Program on the right track Please call, or write, for an appointment fare proposal It would also be appreciated if you would add me to your professional register I would like to be notified when you seriously contemplate Installing a Records Management Program ax; r �j M E M 0 R A N 0 U M Date: December 15, 1978 To: Jon Mikels Fran: Bill Holley Subject: Proposal by Diego Vigil Jon, Per your request. I have looked Into the attached for possible Council action with the following results: 1) The RI v , ! ReaionV Occupation Program (R 0 P ) - w Ich Mri Vigil says will supply the "resources" for educational and on -the -job training, has never—LeArd of Mr VIgII, nor his program. (Spoke w t Mr Al Fl nt, Ba y ,ew P upervisor at 621 -9237) 2) Los Padrinos of San Bernardino has also not heard of him, nor his program (Spoke with Mr Dela Toree, Director, Youth Services Programs, Los Padrinos) While this program has goals and objectives which we all can support, delinquency diversion and prevention, it appears It is a duplication of existing North Town programs (Atzlan and H 0 Y ) Further, the proposal im Ilas that agreements have been reached wl th other organ- izations R.0 P. and Los Padrinos), when It hasn't After discussing these thoughts with Mr Vigil, he asked Royce Lapp, Executive Director of R 0 P prngram to telephone me and explain the basic R 0 P program, which he did But when questioned as to agreements and proposed projects between R 0 P. and Mr VIgII, Lapp Indicated there were none. Mr Vigil may be present at the December 20, Council Meeting to request Council support of his program and allocate $3,700 00 as "seed money" for possible A J A grant Staff recommendation: Based an the lack of budgeted funding for this purpose and the several discrepancies in the proposal, I recommend that o action be taken on Mr Vigil's proposal M•can cc: Council Lauren Wasserman To: Dill l:owilay, Comunity Itusource Director; Lancho cu- cnnunga City Council Pr OM: Diego vigil, Ph.D. Mon: Gubaittud Dec. l,, I!,= :or proposed action by city council on Decenber 20, 1:70, January 2, 1779 is deadline for fully C=nlct-ad proposal. What: The North Toc:n Project Problem: The level or gang- xcic,tod juvenile dolingrant activity in i:orth Town has become a serious social problon. Decent evidence tends to support the opinion that dostructive and violent crinccnore cozu:orly occur there than other sec- tions of the city or county(Peng_y Ziegler, Daily Deport, Ilov. 15 -17, 1970). Efforts to conbat and alleviate this activity have been moderately successful. Lacking adequate super- vision and guidance, many North Town youths select iappro- Driato forn:, of behavior in their daily life. Project Proposal: The £ollo::inr; pages, and cppendi:c de- tailing Arrowhead JuLLicc Asa:ocirtion guidelines, are an outline of a prograu that the city could hole implonent for fiscal year, 197: -c0. according to the proposal, the city would only have to contribute $3,700.00(5,.) in ore'.or to re- ceive $75,0 ^3.00 in focloral f:mdu for the project. The remaining fucds(the project gill cost apnroxinately $150,000.00) will cone frog e:tictirg agoncies. Thus, 'Ilia city would pro- vide beneficial services for L.to- con:acnity, a segouat of ' which requires a now orientation. Lethod o: Alleviating Cann - related Activitv: In run, the "roving" counvolors will wore. c:ith co::- unity % -outic on a daily basis, rcoting times on their hone groundr. -- street cor- nors, favorite hang -outs, hones, etc. -- to thorc::y counsel and guide t::c:a in all activities. In a(Wition, overt effort to involve the youth in regular conmunity activities -- sports, school, ctc. - -will be nado. Expected outcono: Dased on this writer's earlier cornunity ror): and research it to e::pcetsd that juva,ilc onerjy -- thinlcinr and acting- ill be re- channelled into noro socially acceotablo and rospcnsible areas. Vurt•,P.r, that the project itself(-79 -LO year) will o�tnblish a foundation frog which to build a better future progran, with very little city money reruirod thereafter. Durinr, the year of the rojact Lht,: resaarc::er will compile csaza in'i for:�atior.(to c :o�fi- I 4 •i IIORTII TOED PROJECT The North Town Project is a relevant program with the primary objective of reducing delinquency and crime +n (and by) the Rancho Cucamonga North Town and surrounding area by providing 4 1. A diversion program utilizing the Los Padrinos of San Bernardino County youth leadership concept which provides leadership training to youth and young adult cornunity persons, with the objective to work with their peers ( and younger peers ) in reducing violent confrontations and facilitating positive social and recreational activities, utilizing various public and private resources. 2. Alternative education /on- the -job training progran Utilizing the - resources of the Baldy View Regional Occupational Progra:a and Los Padrinos of San Bernardino County consultive resources This component will propose on -the -job training (paid and con -paid) in i the areas of auto repair and hair cutting /styling, thus providing relevent employment /training while giving the students and program staff "ownership" of the "business" training facility which will 3 actually charge for services and those funds recycled into the program. Tentative sites have been considered the sites of the Diversion Component (office space, etc.) is projected to be located at 1230 E Sixth Street, Ontario, or the North Town Community Center. Feron Strppt- P.anrbn roramn.nc Y - ,�¢ The sites of the educational component have not been selected; however, for r' logistical and overall acceptance (sense of proprietorship) the training- "business" sites will be locater zc close to the North Town area as possible, i yet be conducive to /for job training and "business traffic". -1- r�z r SAR Z4177—M, vs I In suv'ary, the project, utilizing paid staff consisting of project coordinator, his secretary, (4) four "roving" conrunity rorkors (young adult corrunity leaders) will provide: I. Diversion Component- A. Imnediate c—ployment of (r,) four young adult cving" co.^.`vnity workers (consist of ex -gang members, or other cocaumity persons). 8, Youth Leadership: ;f A program to rechannel ena develop the leadership potentials of (10) ten pre - delinquent students bcts.een the zgcs of 13 -18 who have been identified as such. ?late: the (4) four aforementioned young adult "roving* coizunity workers will have been previously trained and graduates of the Los Padrinos Le ",:;r; p rn,yrcr., and subsequently facilitate the yruth leadership concept to the younger predclinquert youth leaders. C. Pro, ide social /recreational activities to a minivam of (60) sixty youths (possible - ax!mu: of 100 youths). D Sustain, monitor, and advise two youth groups. E Facilitate the availability and subsequent use of positive (non- violent) activities by N.crth Town youth pop111,1ticn wit.S significant impact on reducing v!olert /delinquent incidents in the area. II.Educational/Trainfng Corponent: Note: the educational /jeb training canpoocnt will be "set -up" (tasks prior to operation) by the coordinative efforts of the project coordinator (and his ,taff). Ins nadrinos of San Bernardino County, and 3aldy 'lira .:eg:enal Occupational Program. i.i111a projects success - technical and (since services to prnjPc' ' :�3ff. Bald Yi" Pvr, u: :i •• ^,r: r(.ri ir: 1 IY,•g::n :ai s•b si: ,rn ,t 1•• the two instructors and iil)I,ruetlull ralerials (!.e.� roV QC desks, Paper, pencils, cash registers, training "nuals, reproduction, etc ). - '2- i i i r A A. On -the -Job trainfnc to, at least, 61 youths per year. 8- $?mediate cmrployixnt (paid) to, at least, 21 youth per year. C. Vorational counseling and placement services to (attitude, Positive vvrk habits, etc.) those 61 youth /pear. D. Job oriented /awareness field trips (at least one per conth) to those yaiths on tiro program. E. At least, eight (a) $50.00 scholarships (graduates of the Program to use to further trade goals). F. Supylemental social- recreatfonal activities. The tw = oapcoents are Interrelated. and inter - functional and support each otter: hwever, enrollets way be actively involved in one cerponent only or in both coxponents simultanecusly, thus allowing flex4bility of the prcgrao, insuring n:axfmum frvolverent of the youth population. Total Project cost is $150,000per year. However. uti1tzfrg existing resound (thereby increasing efficiency and reducing duplication) the 5 project will require $75,600.08 in direct fundin . Su 9 PD'emcntal staff positfoas will be obtained OrZugh CEIA, IWIPOVER, ADULT V0R% E.PERIENCE, 4 and other resources. Cost breakdown. is attached. The Instructors will be salaried emplpyees of the 0aldy View Regional Occupational Program. r ci t,yv Alk Ah PERSOMIEL COSTS Project Coordinator (full time) ill $16,000 /yr „ + 15% benefits...., .$18,240 "Secretary /Clerk (full time) S7,680 /yr„ + 155 benefits .,,$8,832 *Four (4) "Roving" Co :.wunity liorkers $4,000 1yr., x 4 15% benefits .$41,400 *Business student manager (full tire) $7,680/yr., + 15% benefits. .. ...$8,832 *Four (4) auto repair trainees 10 hrs /week /each n $3 OG /hr (no benefits) .$5,760 *Four (4) beautician trainees 10 hrs /week /each 0 $3 00 /hr (no benefits) $5,760 *Two (2) student office aides 10 hrs /week /each g $3 00 /hr.(no benefits) $2,880 TOTAL $11,704 *These positions (projected) to be salaried by CETA, IAIIPMER, ADULT V1CRK EXPERIENCE, and other resources. ROTE: When the training facility becomes operational, R,O.P will pay 34 per each student hour back into the program (for providing the facility) and it is nrojected that 2240 students hours / nonth will be generated, thereby generating $851.20 per month or 510,214.40 per year hack into the project. rurtheimore, there will be some nominal charges (to custo- mers) for student services rendered (auto repair /hair cutting) generating projected revenue of approximately $400 /month or $4,800 /year hack into the program. Conservatively, there could be approximately $15,000 per year generated - I_ E 4 ` OPEP.AII::G LOSIS Rent @ %on /month .... ... ... $1,200 utilities @ $100 /%month ....... .. 1,200 . .... .... . .. . Insurances @ $100 /month ,... 1,200 ............ .. ..... . . (Fire, Property, 13orkman's Comg. etc ) Auditing /Accounting Services ... ...... ........ ... 2,000 . ....... . . . Telephone Service (including installation) .. . ..... ............. 1,000 Facility Maintenance Supplies @ $100 / munth . ... ..... 1,200 Office Supplies @ $50 /month ..... .... 600 Postage Costs 0 $30 /month . ... ..... .. 360 Copying /Printing Costs @ $50 /nnnth .. .. .. ..... ..... 600 EQUIPMENT ACTIVITY FUND Field Trips, (social, educaticnal, recreational) S 00 Office (2 desks, file cabinet, typewriter) ... ... ........S2,000 Vehicle (van) and Maintenance . .. .. . .......... .. .. ... .... 9,0110 Auto Repair Facility - tools /equipment .10,000 Beauty Shop Facility - tools /equipment .. .,. ... .. 8,000 r EVALUATION /CONSULTANT SERVICES_ C Project Pre -tasks (set up) ., , Independent Project Evaluation .. .... . ....... ,el�000_3) ' 1�9 ACTIVITY FUND Field Trips, (social, educaticnal, recreational) S 00 '� y�y�,.c'�Mt•y:i'�,fr a=te "r ':,ai a. � - - -.. - -e ��. -__ __ -_. ,: . - = r'.. -!: ".. gin wti�td.i'• ;.n�• CITY COUNCIL echo Cucamonga Los Padrinos San Bdo. Cou , EafView ommunity P. -- - - PROJECT COORDINA- - ldvisory OR 'card Consultant "Roving" Seefetary Services Community Workers PROJECT DESIGN c Los Padrinos of San Ddo. County l EDUCATIONAL COMPONENT [Co roJeat DIVERSION rdlnafor COMPONENT .� I Communi tv Y7orkers i uty Student Auto rpr ``�.� � � .o liana er S Leadership Pgm. Social ` Inter- Recreational I funet:onal Pgm. , dent u on - nees Prainees i t5 -5o 15 -5o r�tvdent 'ouths Youths .Tent ; C- i i W �F �3e Jie �4p� N yatib . i,�t(�u;ttt,�prF� ;t%• APPEIMIX SM iIEBfU IND (Al I Y CRICRIU(L JUSTICE AT IELiMrx)BICY PRt\ iffial PLANING DISTRICT - iiEGI(RI V - (Aruta'hiEAD JUSTICE ASSOCIATION) AMENDED REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS On August 31, 1978 the Arrowhead Justice Association, established under a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the County of San Bernardino end the Cities of San Bernardino County, authorized the preparation and distribution of a Request for Proposals for the use of a limited amount of 1979 funds made available through the Crime Control Act of 1976 and the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974. Approximately $694,028 in Crime Control funds (Part C - Action funds $645,507, and Part E - Corrections Funds $38,521) and $147,449 in Juvenile Justice funds are available. The Arrowhead Justice Association (Region V -San Bernardino County Criminal Justice and Delinquency Prevention Planning District) is seekina proposals from units of general local government and agencies sponsored by such units for projects which will establish programs within 16 specific program categories or areas, and which will be implemented after July 1, 1979. The 16 categorles are as follows: 1. Reduce major crime through community involvement programs 2. Reduce robbery, burglary and related crimes by reducing the opportunity to dispose of stolen property, better coordinating the detection, apprehending and trial of offenders, and implerenting public prevention and community resistance programs. 3. Reduction and prevention of illegal trafficking in drugs. 4. Provide assistance to crime victims and witnesses through advocacy, service, restitution, preventive counseling and education projects. S. Support the efforts of state and local agencies to implement AB 3121 and SB 42 and related legislative changes. 6. Support multiagency efforts to reduce crimes through coordinated apprehension, trial and disposition of repeat offenders. 7. Provide for improved re -entry services for youthful and adult parolees and other ex- offenders. 8 Develop improved management, organization, and training in the courts. 9. Improve youth development and employment opportunities for young people who are at risk of becoming delinquents 10. Increase the use of diversion and sontencing alternatjves in appropriate cases. SAN DERNARDiND COUNTY CRIHINAL JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PAGE 2 PREVENTION PLANNING DISTRICT - REGION V (A.J.A.) 11. Expand and improve prevention and diversion services to juveniles at risk, of becoming delinquents by increasing ;Se coordination and coopera- tion and agency accountability of public and private agencies. 12. Involve schools in diversion and prevention programs to reduce delin- quent behavior. 13. Develop coordinated efforts among law enforcement, health, welfare, medical,educational, legal,and other related agencies to reduce incidence of child abuse. 14. Improve coordination among criminal justice agencies in dealing with organized criminal activities. 15. Prevent and reduce senior citizen victimization through improved sensi- tivity in public service delivery counseling, education, research and training 16. Provide for research, analysis and evaluation of criminal justice data that will improve the decision making within the criminal justice system. The approximate $831,477 in Parts C and E and Juvenile Justice funds must address the Advanced Techniques and Juvenile Justice and Corrections klaintenaoce of Effort requirements specified in the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Pre- vention Act, as well as in the 1914 California Planning Guidelines document prepared by the State Office of Criminal Justice Planning. These requirements are as follows Advanced Techniques of the Juvenile Justice and Deling-toncy Prevention Act. (A) Community -based programs and services for the prevention and treatment of juvenile delinquency through the development of foster -care and shelter -care homes, group homes, halfwal houses, homemaker and home health services, twenty -four hour intake screening, voluntee- and crisis home programs, day treat- ment, and home probation, ind any other designated community -based diagnostic, treatment, or rehabilitative service; (8) Community -based programs and services to work with parents and other family members to naintain and strengthen the family unit so that the juvenile may be retained in his home; (C) Youth service bureaus and other community -based programs to divert youth from the juvenile court or to support, counsel, or provide work and recreational opportunities for delinquents and other youth to help prevent deliquency; SAN DEIPIARDINO COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PAGE 3 PREVENTION PLANIIING DISTRICT - REGION V (A J.A ) I (D) Projects designed to develop and implement programs stressing advocacy activities aimed at improving services for and protecting the rights of youth impacted by the juvenile justice system; (E) Educational programs or supportive services designed to keep delin- quents and to encourage other youth to remain in elementary and secondary schools or in alternative learning situations; (F) Expanded use of probation and recruitment and training or probation officers, other professional and paraprofessional personnel and volunteers to work effectively with youth; (G) Youth initiated programs and outreach programs designed to assist youth who otherwise would not be reached 6y traditional youth assistance programs; (H) Provide for a statewide program through the use of probation sub- sidies, other subsidies, other financial incentives or disincentives to units of local government, or other effective means, designed to- (I) Reduce the number of commitments of juveniles to any - form of juvenile facility as a percentage of the State juvenile population; (ii) Increase the use of nonsecure community -hased facilities as a percentage of total commitments to juvenile facili- ties; and (iii) Discourage the use of secure incarceration and detention. (I) Programs and activities to establish and adopt, based on the recommendations of the Advisory Committee, standards for the improvement of juvenile justice within the state. In addition to proposals to be funded from 1979 funds which are available the Arrowhead Justice Association is also seeking proposals from units of general local government and agencies sponsored by such units for projects which will be implemented after July 1, 1980. It is estimated approximately $831,477 in 1980 funds will be available to Region V. This would approximate $645,507 in Part C (Action) funds, $38,521 in Part E (Corrections) funds, and $147,449 in Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention funds. At the present time it is understood the California Council on Criminal Justice requires that the 1980 projects also address one or more of the 16 sprcific progtdm areas indicated above. In addition, the Arrowhead Justice Association (previously referred to as the San Bernardino County Criminal Justice Planning Committee) determined in its 1978 Multi -Year Plan that the crime of burglary was the most serious offense category within the Ccunty of San Bernardino. As a part of Region S (;ri- County Council on Criminal Justice), the Arr(wihead Justice Association, in January, 1978, adopted as being compatible with its own priority categories toe Region S tep Lhree priority program areas as t11osc•%:hic6 wuu1J best runt San Ber- nardino County's needs in controlling crime, delinquency and Pecidivism. These three areas sere: �'R > -.. -14- 11 . -. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND DELINQUENCY PAGE 4 PREVENTION PLANNING DISTRICT - REGION V (A J.4.) 1. Reduction of robbery, burglary and related crimes by reducing the opportunity to dispose of stolen property, better coordinating the detection, apprehension and the trial of offenders, and imple- menting public prevention and community resistance programs. 2. Programs to increase the use of diversion and sentencing alternatives. 3. Develop improved management, organization and trainlag in the courts. For 1980 it is understood that the following three California Council on Criminal Justice policy guidelines must continue to be followed: I. "Not less than half of the money to programs selected from a list of specific programs predetermined and narrowly defined by the California Council on Criminal Justice." These are the 16 program categories or areas referred to above. (On June 23, 1978 the California Cc voted to delete a previous provision in the above guideline which required that half of the money be dedicated to "three or less" programs from the list of 16 categories.) 2. "Not less than half of the balance of the money to the single most - pressing criminal or juvenile justice problem in the planning body's j5;isd ICtIon, selected on the basis of its analysis of crime sta- tistics and system deficiencies." In San Bernardino County this most pressing problem is the crime of burglary. 3. "The balance of funds to any other programs directed toward crime and delinquency control or prevention." Bec „use of the California Council's June 23rd decision to delete the "three or less” provision from policy guideline number one, that guideline can now be addressed without necessarily limiting project proposals to the three Region S priority program areas described above. As indicated Parllcr, only units of general local govermnent may apply. Private agencie and orgdni±ations may implement the projects, but must receive sponsor- ship from units of local govermnent. The Arrowhead .;stice Association must target a minimum of 15 percent of tile Part C funds for the courts (project must be implemented by either a justice, municipal or superior court). The Association must also target a minimum of 19.15 percent of Parts C and E cunds to juvenile programs. This Request for Proposals is issued effective November 9, 1978. Complete proposals mNst be received by the Arrowhead Justice Association, or postmarked, by tile. deadline• 5 00 p.m., PST, Tuesday, January 2, 1979. Agencies interested in applying for either the 1979 or 198D funds must obtain the necessary forms, guidelines and instructions from the staff of the Arrowhead Justice Association. Please contact IrJ::i J. C.7A:NT CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANING MANAGER REGI(rt V (ARMOEAD JUSTICE ASSOCIATION) 157 W. FIF M ST., 3RD FLOOR — FAST SAN OERN4.1DIrD. CALIFORNIA 92.45 (714) 303 -1312 ,i S; CITl 0: RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 20, 1978 TO". City Council FROM: Llnyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78 -0194 - ACCEPT BONDS Located on die southeast corner of 19th Street And Jasper Owner: Mao Nell Lees c/o Itob Johnson 7423 Archibald Avenue Inncho Cucamonga, California 91730 Performance R-ad Bond $12,343 64 (Strety) Labor b Hatertvl Road Bond $12,343 64 (Strety) NOTE: This Wear Subdivision was approved by the County and a waiver of Parcel Hap was approved but never completed. The City received the file to completo the waiver and plan check the required Improvement Plans. Itte filing of a Certificate of Compliance co legally dlvido the property was contingent upon receipt of the bonds now ready for Council accep once. Please core Resolution of Acceptance rttached. Respectfully a omitted, �i LLOY NUBBS City Engineer LH:JlM:deb U "..SCI un�W WHEREAS, INS L•n! Z' miratd er w: G,�rc••�•: •.,r Ina .L' 0•J l i•L'••.Tje; t:n, • Dior lol 1. F (d It S • • LAND DIVISION APPLICATION • dr _- w•t � Ix; tp ..•. .. 1 I;ueane. •• , tiJKnY 111•p� • .`�11I`7� Ewmry al `ylll • � G �� /f t / i q 19TH 5TR•EE1- (-O(.NE) (Cxr57 -'G ^mu/e ZA �,¢va7 rg7 NWy! ;O�c:rin.,a/ •��i.1Xci�sJfi.. i��a /mss d Tx'��Vdi� Z 0 i�sac •.t l.. lrr.. APPLICANT: Name- L. Phillip Grarados Phone 714- 754 -6222 Addreas 17500 Red Hill Ave., Irvine, CA. 92714 LEGAL OWNER OF RECORD: Name llae Nell Lees Phone Addreasc 0 7423 Archibald Ave,, Cucam, C1. 9173 NAP PREPARED BY: Naas GENGE CONSULTANTS Phone 714 - 754 -6222 Address 17500 Red Bill Ave., Irvine, CA 92714 TOTAL NO% LOTS._ ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 202-024-,P SECTION,TOWNSH,P AND AANCU amonya Co water p t. SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY- HETROD OF SEWAGE 0I3POSAL Chino 13 nin Muni. Waste I certify thct I am the (check one)Q legal owner, ® his authorized agent and that the information shown hereon is true and correct to the beet of my knowledge :-4, L 1'''t 60t Map Srala (Office Use Only) L.D. NO. _J ZONE ROAD NAP BOOK PAM: NO. �y ✓/� FEE RECEIPT NO..'�( •� 7 p/ cs•-t DATC GC• CbNDI.ICZ:.L AC:ION F• 1r-7.l DATE OF FINAL APPROVAL 0 Al SCame) ' �-> 1 In I 7�9y1 aX _ _� EXISTING �' MOUSE ;O�c:rin.,a/ •��i.1Xci�sJfi.. i��a /mss d Tx'��Vdi� Z 0 i�sac •.t l.. lrr.. APPLICANT: Name- L. Phillip Grarados Phone 714- 754 -6222 Addreas 17500 Red Hill Ave., Irvine, CA. 92714 LEGAL OWNER OF RECORD: Name llae Nell Lees Phone Addreasc 0 7423 Archibald Ave,, Cucam, C1. 9173 NAP PREPARED BY: Naas GENGE CONSULTANTS Phone 714 - 754 -6222 Address 17500 Red Bill Ave., Irvine, CA 92714 TOTAL NO% LOTS._ ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 202-024-,P SECTION,TOWNSH,P AND AANCU amonya Co water p t. SOURCE OF WATER SUPPLY- HETROD OF SEWAGE 0I3POSAL Chino 13 nin Muni. Waste I certify thct I am the (check one)Q legal owner, ® his authorized agent and that the information shown hereon is true and correct to the beet of my knowledge :-4, L 1'''t 60t Map Srala (Office Use Only) L.D. NO. _J ZONE ROAD NAP BOOK PAM: NO. �y ✓/� FEE RECEIPT NO..'�( •� 7 p/ cs•-t DATC GC• CbNDI.ICZ:.L AC:ION F• 1r-7.l DATE OF FINAL APPROVAL 0 Al SCame) ' �-> 4a 6'o ` o o � o ' a ° W 0 n O c 0 RESOLUTION 110. 78c73" O no o 0 0 0 0 n A RESOLUTIOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY (OF RANCHO CUWONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, o AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION (78 -194) ° c '+ WHEREAS, minor subdivision No 78 -194, submitted by Geage Consultants, apd consistiog'of 2 parcels, located at the southeast corner of 19th and'Jasper Streets, being 4 division of a portion of Lot 7, Block 20 of Cucamonga, Homestead Association per Map recorded in Map Book 6, Page 46, records of San Bernardino, California, was aPDroved by the Planning Department of the San Bernardino County on June 13, 1978: and, ° WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequstte to' approval of'the subdivision by the County have now been met'by entry into an Improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement ° security by Alta Loma Villa as developer; NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement' and said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Cltrk to attest; and that said Minor Subdivision Number 78 -194 be ane the same is hereby approved PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1978 ATTEST: .; C ry L erk I yor I C O O 0 0 s • ° e 0becember 6, 1978o e o 0 0 RANCHO CUCOIONCA, °CIT1(;OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES e ° „ •' = ' ReRUlar•llcaUng .- a ° . • .CALL TO ORDER • The regul dr meeting Of the CI[Y council was acid at the Common ify Service Bu tiding, 9161 BJSCllne Road, Rancho 'Cuco —nBn, on tiddoeaday, Dccembur 6, 1978 The meeting was called to order at 7:10 pm by ffayor• James C Frost, who led In the pledge to the flag, \ ROLL CALL P2cscnt: Council members Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Nest, and Mayor Front Ctty Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Assistant Interim City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant to City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; and City Engineer, Lloyd Ilubbs APPROVAL OF Motion! {loved by Palumbo, seconded by Nikels to approve the MINUTES minutes of November 15, 1978 Mutton unanimously carried ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Schlosser announced lie had recteved several phone calls complementing the Sheriff's Deportment for the fine job they were doing. L 2 Nest announced the change to meeting place for the Community Advisory Committee. They would be meeting at the Alta Loma Junior High Library instead of the County library Conference-Room, Meeting will be on the some date, Oeeember 14, at 5:30 p m. 3 Wasserman announced that Stem (h) on the Consent Calendar would have to be removed Since It was a Resolu- tion, it was necessary to pass by a separate vote with title and number read CONSENT Tile following items were presented on the Consent Calendar: CALUDAR a Approval of Warrants in the amount of $319,006.17. • Set December 20, 1978 for a public hearing for Zone Change No 78 -03 -- Slegl c Set February 7, 1979 for a public hearing on an Appeal on Conditional Use Permit No 78 -01. -- Vnnir d Refore claim of Larry W Ileints in the amount of $29,400 to the City Attorney for handling c. Alcoholic beverage license for on -sale beer ani vine for Pizza 'N Stuff at 9740 19th Street f. Tract 9475: Release bonds to Drazan Construction Co. Performance bond (sewer) In the amount of $33,000 Performance bond (water) In the amount of $30,000 ' g Tract 9315: Release bond to Lusk /Walton Cucamonga in r the amount of $2,150 [lotion: Hived by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Content Calendar teems !lotion unanimously carried. ° 0 ° e 0 ! 0 1A City Council Minutes o o o a Il December 6, 1978 e° o c o Poo 2 0 e o O o a ° �0PUBLIC IIFARYNC: a ' .• Airequest submitted hiy Coral Investment, Inc c6 change ° r, a '— • 1110"W& from R -1 Ito A -P fqr 1.625 dcres located on '{ o ZonevCllpn^a 78 -01° , ° ° Booth aide of Basaling between Ca net and Beryl-Avenue, ° ° s • • e' o Ordlntlnco t(,o :47; ° Notiohi Thorc being nw public opposition, it was (sdconj reading) °Omved 6y Palombg, socot(ded by Wvst to.adopt Ordinance u " NJ. 41 and to w.tlde rim .entire rpading. Wasserman o °ran d the 31t1e. !lotion unanimously carried for alopti'on ` ORDINANCE 10. 4T (aatond reading) " AWORDUTANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO • CUCAf103CA, CALIFORNIA. REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. ,. 200- 011;66 (X78-01). PUBLIC HPARIMY:: M ordinance establishing an electric franchise In = 2acho Cucamonga with the Southern California Edison + c Electric Franchise Go The ordinance is identical to two others. Nos. Q 16 and 33 which the'Coin)ell had approved. Becruse of Ordinance Ho. 42 proeeduisl problem, the Pdlson'Co. had refused the e(first reading) ordinance. This was simply starling the process ng.in ' to conform to u... Milano Cots requested procedure. The Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. There f were no protests from either audience or council, thbre- fore the Mayor closed the public hearing. No letters of opposition had been received by the City Clerk. t:otton: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Sch:osser to ' valve the entire reading of Ordinance No 42. Tic10 1►+R read by Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried - Motion: Moved by Falcate, seconded by Schlosser to pass ordinance on to a second reading. Motion unanimously carried. a ORDINANCE NO. 42 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC&'PINCA, CALIFORNIA, CRATING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CONWANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND f TJ IONSTTUIC[ AND USE, FOX TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIEUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND .ILL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CON- DUITS AND APPURTENANCES INCLUDING COCIMUHICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN, AIAMC, ACROSS, UPON OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AIR) PLACES WITHIN THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 33. PUBLIC NEARING: Request for zone change by SeconJo Colomber to change zone from C -2 and M -R to M -2 for 9 3 acres of land located Zone Change No 78-02 on the northeast corner of Etivanda Avenue and Whittram. Jack Lam presented the staff report. The change would Ordinance No. 48 allow the applicant to continue developing an ezlsging (first reading) Industrial center on the site the H -2 zoning would allow more diversity within the project. The zone change to consistent with the proposed General Plan, and -the site is suitable to accommodate permitted uses. St Mlt. Lam stressed the applicant was not requasting, approval A of a project, but the approval of the tone.chadge. t!S •1 O O e a 7 P • ° o ° City Councfl,ltin�rcen,, o December 6, 978 ° ° Page 3 ° 0 ' Motion: HoVed by Palombo, seconded by HSkela to approve ' the zone change, valve entire seadtog of otdLnance, and ' to pass It on for second reading Wasserman read tide ° only. Hatton unanimously carried ORDIW4CI! NO. 48 (first reading) ' ° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI(0 CU(W1ONCA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. ° :29- 151 -15 AND 16, AND 229- 161 -01 THROUGH 07 CITY HANACER'S Hr. Wasaerman the problems listed In the Declaration of STAFF REPORTS Impaction as declared by the Etlwanda School Board as fullovss Etlwanda School Impaction 1. All usable classroom space to now occupied Three classrooms are operating in non - classroom areas 2. Even though we can absorb n few more youngsters into classrooms already existing, any growth will create double sessions 3 There are seven hundred plus homes on the tentative list of Rancho Cucamonga's Tract Statue List. 4. There are five hundred fifty home on the tentative approved list of the City of Fwtana Although out of the Jurisdiction of Rancho Cucamnga, these hove will Impact our schools ! 5 Although we cen absorb approximately one hundred students uin existing classroom° V we wait any longer to request Impaction Delp through Ordinance No 30, section 4 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, we will be overcrowded from new house developoent and will be receiving no compensating financial assistance Staff questioned the 700 homes as listed in item 3 since staff could only account for about 350 hoo.ea on the tentative tract status list 11r. Wasserman brought the fact to the attention of the Council that the other three districts were already impacted, while the Etiwanda School District has claimed they will be The Council asked Hr. Doegherty if they could go ahead and charge the ice on new dove .apment and disburse it when over - c.owding ixisted. Hr Dougherty said that SB -201 states an existlnr, overcrowding cordirinn must already exist and we would be boa: to welt unt -1 ..,are ,:d in -ct..1 rr% zwdlne condition SB -201 was not adopteu for the planning stage, but for an existing overcrowding situntlan Ewr°r.- ftasfrD Hikels felt that Etivando was part of the Chaffey High School Dlst.ict and tha district had declared an Impaction, therefore, s ' we could collect fees on new developments under that declara- tion Questions arras regarding the wording of Ordinance No 30. The council ieIt that this should be investigated and brought bask to the pext meeting n ° n ° , r r o u 4 O %^•� O P ° a n BCE Cyy Cquncib Mlnbte9 ° t. o ° ° • -.•^ ° Dceembe;t6. '1978 •. a • . u e ° ° ° °~ pya P3go 4 • , c• Motian: Moved by Palombo, seconded by MSkols to continue ° o reds item After chocking Ordinance He 10 Motion a o' p unanimusly carried. Avendwnt to Request to amend Low Enforcement Agreement with the ° Sheriff's 'County, of San Bernardino Re :on for the awndment contract was, over th- `lability bold - harmleas section,, This had acen.on a 50 -50 slinru beats with the County HOw- over; our Insurapce Company, Empire Company, did not want to handle the policy that way III* County had been contacted, and it was being presented to the Board of Supervisors to amend the contract. Notion: !loved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve [ho amendment to the law enforcement contract which would held the City harmless of liabilities incurred by the t d'ougty as listed in the Amendcd Contract. Motion unani- ! mously carried. Report re Staff report was by jim Robinson. Surveys had been made Mobile How Rent by staff as required before any consideration of adopting Pcvlew Board an ordinance could be rode Pr Robinson explaine.1 the problems other cities "ch as Vacaville, Rialto. aid Qyitb:r were having after an ordinance had been adopted and when the City tried to 1r,flcmont it It was agreed by thu Council tent adopting an ordinance establishing a Rent Review Coe:.,aslon was not the way y j to go since we would proba.A• trt be able to implement it It was felt beat to 1•a: ,h,: other cities follow through to see if uowthit g t. roupb the courts could be. done Mayor questioned what cwtld t:,c council do while waiting the outcoma of thee,, coo-is to help alleviate some of tie problems. 4P~` Mlkelo asked the City Art. r:ey as to the time Zleav Of an Injunction? Mr. D� ul,g. tty said they do have priority. • In San Bernardino Covoty .*icy can get to trial within a a year if they are p, are- along Was—Lcr n letter e!,i_pid b drnf d to the owners of mobile home parka Li the city asking for rate increaens to 0 ocuwnte=d y, rhaps a task force of some type cuu a esto s u$to discuss Arabians and solutions. Mayor asked for corae-nts from the public. Those addressing the Council were: Robert Davis, Alta Vista. — they were having weekly metings. However, they had a n been able to meet with the owners. Harry Pate, Alto Laguna, — "ncouraged the City Council to pass an ordinance new so when the Colton and Rialto cases had been decided, Council would be ready City Attorney cede it clear that the Couucll could pass an urgency ordinance In one meeting. O e o 1 0 0 E r.'t"✓� rr'<t'.•.iC .{ °e +sum.. IC ,. _ `__L1E' -= .. .. �. .... ___ � _._ ... _ � Vo.J _ O O a "�,'�° o'% • > City Council i(lnutpe ' Dnce=er u, 1978 j •� ° ` Page 5 1 ° , 9. ro ° Mr.. llcarl, Alta Laguna, eomwented about West's suggestion in c7r o contacting the park owners Ile felt that would be helpful ` smite the owner and tenrnt had dffffcult get in^ together Jack P1nc,'Alta Laguna, asked It the oeeff warn" be willing and could they ace in the aennnra' behalf? the City 'Attorney salt) rho staff dould, but they should not be made nq, nrbrltrator The.thing the staff could do would be to .4 aJo°pt some form of rent Sontrul measure, but these u¢rc f 6e1nktested An court noy. Pfne asked If* they could got a a commjtmnnt fru`um the itoff7 Wassaran said a letter could ] go out this omek l palff'��'q�suggestod that three mobile home tenants and two dp.•dit ' cagxrembers' contact park owns re and begin a series of study program. Mlkels suggested'even'further `ttnat staff get a .r letter out tp Park owners, and' fn tie letter relate the ciq to in* the process gf forming a Rent Review Committee He Alto suggee[ed'btaf.f corm baek n he n xt meeting with ale rnat ves Lot eStUb USning a Rant Review Committee ' 0 Mntibn: .-Moved by Hlk¢le to, have oSnff writ a lector Informing them She City to uatablishing a Rent Review Committoe,and have- staff cone bock to, council for alternatives for a.Rent Review Committee. Seconded by Palombo. Motion tnanitmusly carried. ' Both'Sbhlosser and Palombo volunteered to be the Council representatives on tho ctrmmlttee Hr Hearl was asked if he 1 could get three park representatives together to serve on L the committee. RECESS At 8:75 p m. the Mayor called a recess. The meeting reconvened at 8:50 p m. with all Council members present �A Baseline Staff report was presented by Lloyd Hobbs The proposed Condemnation condemnation Is- located at the southwest corner of 11¢I1man and Baacline. AcyWsltion of this property is required for the ccmplution of the planned county project to widen Baseline from Hallnan to Archibald Because there arc current liens against the property which exceed the market value, it is necessary to condenn the pro- perty Instead of dealing directly with the owner of said property. The city will be purchasing the entire parer, since the remainder would not be a legal bulldtble lot. (Perhaps at a later tlmo the remainder lot could be sold .o the ajoitning lot) It is anticipated title to be under construction sometime late March or April HLkols naked about the costs involved in a condemnation Then asked how do we care to all the liens Hr Dougherty ,.aid the court would make an estimate of the tothl amount of ew everyone's Interest, then everyone would be given a portion out of the pat The courts make the awards and portions it. out There would be only one cost -- the market value of the property -- everyone's portion comes out of that. o 0 rW t 'r v � �lx�.•ti %U •� ` o o a r f► City Council Minutes y December 6. 1918 �Pago 6 1 n LJ J J Motions Moved by Palombo, seconded by Nest to adopt a,Rusolution of Intent, waive :hu entire reading • Title read by Nasoorman Matlou unanimously carried , RESOLUTION NO. 78 -71. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE .CITY Or RAN-11q CUC#MONGA, GILIFORNLI, TO'CYERCISE RIGHT OF Di; EJIT•DOtiAttl TO ACQUIRE PROPERTY FOR 66%,rRUCTING . OR.IM•ROVIHC A PUBLIC HIGHWAY AND ACCOMPLISHING ALL < NECESSARY I14gI ENT$ THERETO Resolution A Resolution appointing an officer and agent to appointing Officer accept documents in behalf of the city. This would allow and Agent to Accept the GI.y Engineer and*hls,ae igtant to.accept gratin documents. right -of -way decumentg', acknowledge offers of dedi- cation documents, and accept documents for ylghCof- Resolution No. way parcels piediously approved for, purchase. by the City 78 -36 Council.- Council decided they want4 the appointments iade by new not by position. Hotion:, Moved by.Paiombo„ seconded by Schlosser td approve Resolution No 78 -36 as areoddd to. Include the names of City Engineer, Lloyd Ilubhs, and Associate Civil Engineer, Paul Rogugau, and to waive Uio entire reading. Wasserman road title ohfy , Hotipn unanimously carried . RESOUITIOlt NO 78 -37 A RESOLUTION W11h6 CITY COUNCIL'OF THE CITY OF JZANCHQ CUCAMORGYI, CALIFORNJA,. APPOINTING AN,OPFICER AND AGENT TO ACCEPT DEEDS CN BEHALF OF THE CITY. - Capital Improve- Proposed Capital Improvement Projects'were presented by went Projects Lloyd Ilubbs. Tile Engineering Divisibn had identlfIdd two projects which felt deserved an early conside.ation for funding through appropriation of County contingency �1 foods aad gas tax revenues Projects are: a. Sa0phire Stieat (minor widening) both sides of the street at the Foothill Freeway right -of -way it an ustimated cost of $11,000 b. Baseline Road (elnor widening) east of Archibald Avenue at proposed kiddie Romer Dyn Care Center esti- mated cost of $5,00) Discussion arose with the widening of Baseline project. Applicant Ed Young spoke regarding the necessity of the project. Jack Ian addressed the problems and alteraotives before the Council as follows: 1 They could IN,ve the property condemned and pay for the legal action. 2 They could accept Hr. Youngs offer and pay 3/5s of the cost, sharing 1/5 with Hr Young and 1/5 with Diversified Industries, the company doing the shopping center on the corner of Archibald and Baseline, or 0 3 The possibility of setting up a special district. 0 O n LJ J J City Caln.ti Minutes December 6, 1978 Page 7 Motion: Moved by Palumbo, s ?conded by West to approve the ' Sappldre project and table the 11aselina project to the flrst meeting In January 1979 Mo:l,n unanimously carried. City Attorney requested a pr, llmhmry title search be aide 0 Vanir Develop- Request by VanLr Development to •-move "T" standards on went - 19th d property located on the northeast comer of 19th and Amethyst Archibald The situ plan had been approved by the Planting Commission and In order to proceed With the developaant, the "T" standards nettled to be removed Hr Dauhgorty said the "T' should be r.rllfied only to permit certain usages The Exh0it A an the 7anir Report should be Exhibit 8 and a ntv "A" male according to the Attorney. He felt the "T", should not be completely removed. Question arose over the list of uses which Were pormitted in the area. It Was felt some of these still Would not be appropriate,to the area since traffic flow was a problem (and parking). JACK Im felt the list of uses should be referred back to the Planning Commission for review. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palumbo to refer ,back to the Planning Cocmission for review the list of of uses, and bring back to the December 20 Council venting Motion unanimously carried UMayor suggested this go to the Advisory Committee for review. Deannexation Sraff report by Jack Lam. There Were three areas in ftie -.outhwest portion of the city which were somewhat isolated In terms of land -use planning and city services, it would be more logical for these areas to be part of the City of Ontario Ontario had been made aware of this Mr. lam dis- cussed the procedure involved in deannexatlon Ile stressed that although the Council voted to approve, it aid not mean this would be done Meeting was opun to the public for input Mr. Warren, owner of some property zones manufacturing, In the most northerly section spoke Ile did noL want to see this go to Ontario and become zoned residential. !lotion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by West to approve the staff recommendations and proceed With the deannexation of the three southwest areas of Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Ontario. Notion unanimously carried. Resolution No Item tied been removed from the Consent Calendar since a 78 -70 Resolution aecdod to be adopted and would have to have title ' and number read, However. It would a routine matter accepting street bonds for a devolopaurt ac the southeast corner of Baseline and Archibald by Diversified Investment Co. RESOLUTION NO. 78 -70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND :MPROVCHEhr SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 110. 4251. i Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve j` Resolution No. 78 -70, unit Waiva entire reading. Title read by Wasserman. Notion unanimously carri�,d is City Council Minutes U-camber 6, 1978 Page 8 NEW BdStNESS 1. Schlosser said here were streets in Old Tama that do not go along with till general plan of the city After scow discnaslcm, it was decided the item should be referred to tine Traffic Co=itte¢ for study and bring reco— raiatlons back to the Council. Schlosser felt Cho vuggeation as fine Li kee 2. Mlkels announced he was at a Benrd- public hearing when four SCAG p•ograms -- water quality, air quality, growth forecast, one waste treatment -- were discussed He pointed cut SCAG had projected year 2000 growth forecase population at an estimated 66,000 This was far short of .hat was actually being forecasted Jack lam said ho would be sanding out a report regarding these negotiations very shortly 3. Mayor announced 1M had received a Resolution from the City of Upland that they would be sending to Sacramento expressing their displeasure in the Foothill Freeway Issue lie Rasserman said h¢ felt a personal letter was far noru oftective than a RC6olutlon Docembar 16 umuld be a follow -up meeting regarding the Foothill Freeway and the approacl. we will be taking at Elie Transportaion Comtalssion's meeting on January 25 and 26 in San Bernardino +1 bleat announced we should send m Resolution to the '}wyf new City of Grand Terrace congratul4tln0 them on their t' Incorporation. ADJOUM11ENf !lotion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adjourn. Motion unanimously carried. The meeting adjourned at 11:10 P.M. Hespectfu•.r - +witted, Beverly Authelet Deputy C'ty Clerk F J