Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/01/15 - Agenda Packet - AdjournedCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HE10RANDUH Date: January 15, 1479 Too City Council From: Jack Lao, Director of Community Development Subject: ABOUT THE LuMuR YARD ON BASELINE AND ROCHESTER To assist the Council members In re- enforcing their decision to not allmr spot designations of commercial or industrial for the H 6 H Lumbet, the fol- lowing in a summary of the factors that went Into the decision: 1 An Isolated industrial- coraaercial use in a virgin residential area has nuisance factors incompatible with residential neighborhoods. 7 The City Council did not approve this site. It was given approval by the County. The City Council merely got involved In an Issue pertaining to the access road,therefore,it can not be claimed that the City originally allowed the use to go in. 3 Although the County made a mistake by originally approving the use, the City should not compnund it by making the situation worse 4 The property owner incorrectly stated that the property directly north of the subject site was flood control .and but it belongs to Joe DSIorio and Is developable land. 5 A lumber business is one of the met relocatable businesses primarily because the majority of the use Is storage and the Improvements are basic and any utilities extended to the alts are necessary for any other development anyway. 6. Land 1- this City has doubled and tripled in value over the last three years therefore the claim that a nonconforming statue would financially wipe them out Is tenuous. 7 By being a nonconforming use in the residential zone the •urrent use can mjny a privilege which other new uses can not enjoy in tao future; Nat is having the exposure and location that Is less costly to operate than else- where in the industrial areas; therefore, the property owner can enjc; one favorable business advantage. 8. The effect of the City Council's decision was that 1) the person woo remain in business, 2) may expand 10% more, 3) accessory buildings such as that required by OSHA are exempt from this expansion. ABOUT THE LUHBER YARD ON BASELINE ANTI ROCHESTER Page 2 January 15, 1979 I hope this assists the Council in ra- enforcing their decisions. Respeo• fully 6adttcd, JACK LAN, Director o �- Community Development JL:= ry January 10, 1979 City Council Rancho Cucamonga Re, Request submitted by Louis R. Parks Zone Change No. 107 -67 Sirsf This letter is to express favor for Mr Parks' proposal to turn tht large home on the property in question into a restaurant. The existing building is a very old and fine home of historical significance to community. It would not fit in with the more cant- mporar jelopment nearbys and could create a problem without psrmiseiv r some appropriate special use. Tne special uae suggested see at appropriate. Not the least of the noncern is the need to conserve the old lane *arks of the new rommunit . The Parks' idea of a restaurant. serves t -is excellently. wo have lived on eleven acres across the street from the Albert home since 1949 ano feel we hove firm basis for the opinion here expressed. or an mrs P1i11erd err /030,/ Concurring in the above opirion�. � end Firs Hon Featheringill 10303 lk ukti 4A-e- K.XrICHO CUC\mONGAX WO(T)EN'S CLUB P O. Box 334, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 January 10. 1979 The Honorable Mayor James C. Brost City of Rambo Cucamonga Dear Mayor Frosts On behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Womenra Club, our Presidents Mrs. Gerald VerBurg wishes to request a few minutes of your time at the City Council Meeting on January 13, 1979. The Members of our club wish to present to the City our award winning Community Imp ovement Project Achievement Book, (C.I.P.) which is a compilation of news Stems, phamplets.etc. pertinent to the Women's Club partioipaticn with continuity of story toward the effort of incorporation. This effort as expressed in am- C.I.P. Scrap Book has van the following awanis for our Rancho Cucamonga Women's Club, 1. General Federation of Woments Clubs and Sean - Roebuck Citation of Achievement 2. California State Honorable Mention h Achievement 3. District Award Winner Sears_Rosbuck 4. Pmaidsnt's Award of Merit for Outstanding Achievement The project entailed two years of diligent work by over ono - third of our active membership and the committee. Our club belles as this book will have historical significant intenst to our Sew City and therefore wish to present it to our city. /� ti ✓ 5 rely, i ` /•. Buban YerHUrg, president Rancho Cucamonga Woman siClab BY: Mrs. Marguerite L. Vincent Correspooding Seoretarr Please R.S.V.P. to - Mrs. VerBurg - 987 -3727 or, Mrs. Vincent - 982.4879 Gakman Norton Simon LU11 o Vke Chd,m n ,with SoNy rfw MrmDem ROW'S 91ina.NA San Frann,ao Claude Faman¢ea S.10" Inn HIM, aln RbeMde Dean M'rer Hayfo,t 6TATF 0` CALIFORNIA ( �, CC-- ""��� -�` E DMUN D C. 9 ROWN I R. a GONmOe Wifnrttia c, rattoparta irin Gmnnunninn 1110N5TREEr P.c sox1119 SAtl:AMr NTO 95905 191611.61100 January 4, 1979 hr Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0. Box 791 Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dent Mr. Wasoorman: 'DEC, - lV-0 CITY OF RAND-C fUCAMON0A AMINIETn 11CH JAN 8 1978 7 81911ii1L'sI2i1i2jaI4I5I6 The Review Coemittee of the California Transportation Commission will hold a meeting to receive community and citizen teatlaony on the Issue of whether the Commission should Initiate a process to determine the future of Route 30, the Footh111 Freeway The Review Committee meeting will be from 0 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. on Fr.j aya_January 26. 1979. City Council Chaa ers, orth "D" Street, San Bed, California I"...'lawman Co ®lsslon staff is coordinating testimony presentation with Salts Ana Mr. Wesley McDaniel, Executive Director, San Bernardino Association Calais CN,.M. of Governments, and the San Bernardino County Transportation Com- DIrmPNvmrr mlasion The Commission is asking that city and county officials Clan's Palo and citizens .nterest groups coordinate their testirriny with $an o4za Hr. McDaniel in order to provide a coherent presentation. Ea MRkaf'.e . The meeting will begin with an introduction by Caltrans, followed Sanamr lame, R. Mail by statements from State legislators, presentations by the San Bernardino and Los Angeles County Transportation Comissions, Ausmeirmm ntatements from city and county officials, and comments from various WOUr M.IgdN citizens groups E., a /K lately r If your local agency or organization wishes to make a presentation, Michael P. please contact the Commission office, (916) 445 -1690, prior to Evanhoe January 16 in order to be placed on the agenda. S3�O� %..�iG� • MICHAEL P. EVAMHOE Executive Secretary N A C E H D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting January 15, 1979 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG 3. ROLL CALL: Mikels Palombo--.S—/ Schlosser_✓, West ✓ , Frost 6//. 4 APPROVAI OF MINUTES: December 20, 1978 and January 3, 1979. S. ANNOUNCEMENTS I, 6 CONSENT CALENDAR: The following Consent Calendar item are expected to be routine and non- controversial They will be acted upon by the council at one time without discussion Any Council member, staff member, or interested party may re- quest that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion, a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $30,677 15 . ... . 1 _ 'o b. Claim against the City for injuries and damages suffered by Randy E Fremming Refer to City Attorney for handling. .. .. ... ... .. .. 4 c. National °ague of Cities Congressional Conference It is recommended that the City Council approve the attendance of the City Manager and the Mayor at the National League of _ Cities Congressional Conference in March 1979. Funds have been included in the current years budget for attendance of both city officials d. Semiann.:al Report - County Environmental Health Services. The Environmental Improvement Agency has submitted a report to the City Counrlt outlining the services provided to our community be...een the months of January thru June 1978 It is recommended that the City Council receive and file the report. .. ... ... ,. .. 8 e Approval for application for Alcoholic Beverage License on sale general for D. Bradford Henderson, Pizza Hot, 6709 Carnelian Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga 91701 ... .. 10 f Release of Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the amount of $3,000 Land Division 73 -0598, Owner. Robert A and Sandra G. Suhr - Located on Wilson Avenue between Carnelian Avenue and Beryl Street .. . . . . . .. . .. .. .. 11 g. Tract 9002: Accept Roads and release bonds to son Miguel Performance Bond (Road) $110,000 ....-12 Tract 9003: Accept roads and release bonds to Sunflower Land Company, Inc. Performance Bond (Road) 46,000 .. .. 15 Tract 9116: Accept roads and release bonds to Gary G IN l ler Performance Bond (Road) 32,000 17 t; 1 'City Council Agenda -2- January 15, 1979 Tract 9320: Accept roads an, release bonds to Lewis Tract 9345: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes of California Perfornance Bond (Road) $74,000. .. 19 Tract 9341: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes Performance Bond (Road) $52,000• •• of California Tract 9378: Release of bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc Performance Bond (Sewer) $161000 Tract 9379: Release of -bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc. Perform, nce Bnnd (Hater) $26.000 $20,000. ... . 33 _ Performance bond (Road) $56,000. 21 Tract 9342: Accept roads and release bands to Lewis Performance Bond (Road) Homes of California 35 _ Tract 9586: Release cf bonds to Lewis Performance Bond (Sewer) $21,000 California Performance 00 (Hater) $26,000 $33,000 Performance Bond (Road) $70,000.... .. 23 Tract 9343: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis California Homes of California Performance Bond Performance Bond (Serer) $20,000 Performance Bond Performance Bond (Water) $23,000 Tract 9636 Accept roads and release Performance Bond (road) $60,000. 25 Tract 9344: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis $18,000 Homes of : alifornia Performance Bond (Hater) $28,000 Perfornan:e Bond (Sewer) $23,000 43 _ Tract 9280: Performance Bond (Hater) $28,000 Builder, Inc Performanee Bond (Road) $64,000. . 27 Tract 9345: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis 9 Homes of California Performance Bond (Sewer) $17,000 Performance Bond (Hater) $21,000 Performance Bond (Road) $52,000• •• 29 Tract 9378: Release of bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc Performance Bond (Hater) $39,000. ....... 31 ._ Tract 9379: Release of -bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc. Performarce Bond (Hater) $20,000. ... . 33 _ Tract 9401 Accept reads and release bonds to Olympus Pacific Corporation Performance Bond (Road) $274,000. 35 _ Tract 9586: Release cf bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performarce Band (Sewer) $33,000 Performance Bend (Hater) $63,000 38 Trait 9587: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond (Sewer) $24,000 Performance Bond (Hater) $26,000. .. 41 _ Tract 9636 Accept roads and release bonds to Chevron Construction Company Performance Bond (Sewer) $18,000 Performance Bond (Hater) $28,000 Perform ice Bond (Road) x10,000 .... 43 _ Tract 9280: Accept roads and release bonds to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc Performance Bond (Sewer) $38,000 Performance Bond (Water) $55,000 Performance Bond (Road) $144,000 ... 44A 9 City Council Agenda 3- January 15, 1979 7 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Zone Chance No. 78 -05 _Southern California Luthern Church To change the zone from R -1 (single family residential) to A -P (administrative /professional) for 5 51 acres of land located on the Hest side of Haven Ave , north of Lemon . .... .. ... . .. . 45 ORDINANCE NJ 51 (Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU'ICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR "S PARCEL RO 45 201 - 261 -08 FROM R -I TO A•P ..... ... ... .............. 8 Zone Chance No. 78 -06 submitted by Hone /Gorcen To change the zone from R -1 (singlt family residential) �j✓"t to A -P (administrative /professional) for 9 7 acres of land located or. tha southwest ocrner of Baseline and Hellman , ORDINANCE NO. 52 (Second Reading) t AN ORDINANCE OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO \ Sy CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 208 - 011 -02 AND 04 C C An aooeal of the Rancho Cucamaina's Plannine Commission for .Z9➢e_chA119e11o, 10367 - A change of zone trom A -1 -5 (limited £ agriculture) to C -1 (limited commercial) for property located on the south side of 19th Street appro.(tmately 1,500 feet east of Hermosa - Cequest submitted by Louis R. Parks .. _ 4Q4 / D. Ordinarre Amendtn Ordinance N_o��_30_pertaininc to Financing of�nfer m Sc oo Facilit(es The purpose of the Ordinance is to make it clear thtt in those cases where the building permit is issued by an agency other than the City, that the fees are nevertheles? wdid directly to the city. ORDINANCE NO 56 (First Reading) p AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO �(Sl s CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 110 30 ;. PERTAINING 10 FINANCING OF INTEPIM SCHOOL FICILITIES. . ... 51 C Ordinance Amendinc Ordinance NO. 8 Which Pertains to a Perk and Recreation Tax for lien Residenlla Oeve ooment It was called to our attention that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not the enforcing agency for the purpose of issuing building permits for mobile home spaces in mobile home parks (see Health and Safety 'ode Section 18300, It�Seg_ and Section 18500, et Seq.) This amendment is therefore necessary to insure that the City can collect its park and recreation tax with respect to mobile home park uevelopments ORDINANCE NO. 57 (First Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CFLIFO.RNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 8 WHICH PERTAINS TO A PARK AND RECREATION TAX FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. . . I . . 53 r City Council Agenda -4- *January 15, 1979 F An Ordinance Desi natin Certain Cif Officers and Employees to n orce Ce tan Portions at [ the Code. The attached ordinance is the enabling legislation to allow the Council to designate certain employees to enforce the City code and the Resolution specifically designates key individuals to the san: Plea tq that the p,rsnn having primary responsibility fd cede enforcement woule be the Community Code Representa ntldwever, three othe^ names are designated as backups especially since these individuals are periodically involved in code enforcement ORDINANCE NO. 54 (First Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF T'iE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE POTTER OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDINANCES AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO THEREIN RESOLUTION NO 79 -3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDINANCES AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO THEREIN. „ G. Adult Businesses The City attorney has recomnendLi that the City Council Ordinance Ito 45 which pertains to the interim zoning for adult businesses City Council is aware Ordinance No. 45 eppires shortly unless it is extended by the City Council IT2 proposed Ordinance provides for an extension of Ordinance ko, 45 until August 1, 1979 In the interim, it is anticipated that the City staff and the Attorney will work jointly to prepare permanent regulations for consideration of the Planning Commission and the City Council krmiENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt Ore nance Ila 55 as an urgency Ordinance Because the Ordinance is proposed as an urgency measure, it is required that the City Clerk or City Attorney reed the proposed Ordinance in its entirely. 57 „yCX \�� ORDINANCE 110 5b - (1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a \}T CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ACJLT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF, ,,, 58 H. Draft Environmental Im Re a Prop im Land Use, C rcu t on ct ort nd sties ements at Eno beneral Pan RESOLUTION NO. 79 -4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT OR THE INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC j11 FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE GE14ERAL PLAN FOR THC CITY OF C RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RESOLUTION NO 79 -5 (i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU14CiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW POLICIES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.. .. .. ... .. .... 68 City Council Agenda �� -5- + January 15, 1979 8 E 10. 11 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. tieetlns with Alta :aguna /Alta Vista Mobile Hom: Parks Owners F_ m i o nS sso; 71 B Arrowhead Justice Association Grant p n, -7p by �o.... t, n a n Tom cum .b$A'1U0. / 1: 75 L. Proposed Agreement to Joint Powers Agreement--Omni trans The Omnitrans Board of Directors nas recommended that each member agency approve an amendrf•nt to the Joint Powers Agreeru:nt which would enable nonelected officidls to vote in the absence of elected ofricials The amendment is proposed in order to provide the ctntinuity which is essential for the Ommitrans Board of Directors. While Rancho Cucamonga's representative attends almost every Gmitrans meeting, this is not the case in other mnunities 81 enabling nonelected officials to vote in the absence of the principal delegate, edch city will retain its representation and will have a voice in the policy issues affecting Iknnitrans ,,,, 95 RECOMENDA11ON: It is recommended that the City Council approve the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement hhich created the County Wide Transportation Authority, Omnitrans D. Request for Vineyard Park Athletic Field Improvements - An Oral Report by - Bill Ito-Ilej. .. 100 E. Conmunit', Development Block Grant - by get, Jolley— . ... . . .. 103 F Cantrrct Award - 51 oats at Baseline and Archibald and oot . an an ernar no load S by L oy ITS —, 105 G Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Protect Selection - by Lloyd Hubbs 107 H. Lrag_ue of California Cities Planning Commissioners Institute uck by tam. , CIT'f ATTORNEY'S REPORTS HLV BUSINESS a Council b Audience ADJOURNMENT If .=r:yi y! di =Z. oI O O .p m O O O m m OIN ° N O H m Nl° P t O L1 u N N N N m N � N O N U• ry N N N fl N N N O O O .p m O O O m m OIN ° N O H m Nl° P t O r-I AIM .-1 N O .•1 O N .-I M M Pry O V m fl .p O ry O 1� M 000 n � q U y Y C O O U u W N YN1 Y~f � NIOrI YMI N � M rl 0 0 W Y q U O ti • Y M 4 C m U M C C n° u H nil G U 4 u d d C � M N y 4 4 p d W d O N R q U y Y C O O U u W C e M V 0 0 W Q4 7 Pry F Y q C u W W ti M M 4 y 4 H OI Y Y C rl W C G W L rya FFFF q 1 ti q 9y 9 • K {uppp. yd W~ q U b .tp1n W .� m re-I1 'J � I' G� W 4d4 ` ^C!I T H uC K � Vu G ..1 S ❑ In u rl UI N .-1 M ° ° m •-1 ° N O M ry M M M N N N M N N O N r O N N U .1 1 1 ry I N H h O 1 11 R O n O 00 y O n o o A O O o O Y U O ti • Y M 4 C m U H M O O U C C n° u H nil G U 4 u d d C � M N y 4 4 p d W d O N R q U y Y C O O U u a f 3 I ugnN.osm.....a`.. OI G W N V N N N N N N N N N N M1 N N �"I nam,Dl,Pq n e w � p p N �I .Y NI.1 h rl V1 u w q o � � a q ' u q C L q S O q Y y b 4 y N O N r1 4 O a cc q U a U U U aqi b a o M H N N C� N O O CP � 4 4 4 pq{ 9 V M V •O P � qO � 4a VI M .-1 b N b N nl .., q U � i.yl P iC jl P Y N v rby U C C C C 4 x iY9 O N .NI U SGG a V u M O O O O N GCG U qNq GGU ~ q O L 1 W 0. aq V i-1 N N H i4 .4 OI •-I N N N N ry � N N C1 N rV rl 4 O O O O O O p O O O O O O O O O O O O O M q M M a q b ' M �4I1 •_ V � T 2 7 L s4 ] M C M O ti � O A C '� I J/ ry ry n o m o m n N v m P N O N V O m V •4 N v v N y m c. N H N 1 •r-il m >4. N b m L w o. B na a CU O, �•Oi q�• 9 W b F L H w w d e w o >S. N H N O � � w � u b N m 1 1 1 .mi .mi ti 1 1 1 .d •4 rl O O O u Y a y a K a a u N N a J >. F w w O m ttlt O. 4 {iy u u C 1 •1 s V m v N •(• m m w A 0 F L v v F O Q N O N y r Y1 W H n LI •rwJl N m m w a M � m 0. a N .Pi t 7 T •, N w u m a M M 4 O \♦ U C � W a \\ u y u 3s 4N � ��o it u r m N N m m N N N N N m .451 U N N N ry N i 1 �'• N r N N N 1.1 m PI1. O O O N n rvIry N o rl rIP ymj N � m .a o o v ry •'1 v .. �'1 o -1 m N •o .y m 4y' m N O 1 N n Mqq t l 4 O M w i• y R4 W y V Y U a � om f• w P � _ M P U O Y m J •9'1 w U w U U U a .y L U a M U UI M C q O• p F � y U U U x N U N � x m tl 11 g tl 4 a L •O W ppH UU 2 N P w .i .Li.Li Q C U .1 a K 1 U > ^ ry� ti wm U qa u .Li U tl � S 'l m W rV 111 tli ( 10 O O pa N N > U r p OW VO Fnn mPr u m 0 [tlj k' m � NO11 N N p m P N m y VOI N V 1 T 1 1 < O 0 0 O O o D •� o O U N a G 1 ty1. jj "W a a � 4 aN� i a p a tl ¢ b M L 4 � >. a ° u O 1 C V .gLj f p W W O• C d U 9 Y y V V 0 a � p m y ry ry n o m o m n N v m P N O N V O m V •4 N v v N y m c. N H N 1 •r-il m >4. N b m L w o. B na a CU O, �•Oi q�• 9 W b F L H w w d e w o >S. N H N O � � w � u b N m 1 1 1 .mi .mi ti 1 1 1 .d •4 rl O O O u Y a y a K a a u N N a J >. F w w O m ttlt O. 4 {iy u u C 1 •1 s V m v N •(• m m w A 0 F L v v F O Q N O N y r Y1 W H n LI •rwJl N m m w a M � m 0. a N .Pi t 7 T •, N w u m a M M 4 O \♦ U C � W a \\ u y u 3s 4N � ��o , a" .L.r "� .•?'(••...,9 -.. �,,,, •• /. 4 %;� "'"�,: !.v^r;"�';. +,r wart z�!': l� In the hatter of Claim of ) IiA::Di E. FRCIIMIHG ) Caaim No. s ) against the City of Rancho Cucamonga ) APFLICATIOI FOR LEAVE and the County of San Bernardino, ) TO PRESFNT LATE CLAIM ) r } r • The undersigned hereby makes application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the County of San Bernardino for leave to present a late claim against tnc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt40NGA and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ror the injuries and damages suffered by RANDY E. FREMMING, on or about September 9, 1978, and in support of said application represent as follows: 1 That all information stated in the claim attached hereto is true and correct; 2. That said document attached hereto be, and is, incorporated herein as if fully set out at this point; 3. That the injured p .:on, 1NNDY E. FREHMISG, is a minor That he was hospital -1 for a period of three days following the accident and ae9:ained absent from school for a period of three weeks during which time he suffered from severe swelling about his face and his eye, to a point where his eye was swollen completely shut. 4. That the injured person, RAt1OY E. FRERI!ING, was born on 5 That the date of the action in question was on September 9, 1978 -11 .r .L W ?r�rt 6. That because claimant is a minor and due to the sevority of his injurieswherein he was incapacitated for an extended period of time, claimant was unable to obtain the knowledge of his requirement to file a claim against the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO within the one - hundred (100) days from the date of the accident, and that the allowance of a late claim will riot prejudice the City of Rancho Cucamonga nor the County of San Bernardino WHEREFORE, the undersigned here), respectfully requrests that said application be grantee forthwith. i S d MB to- t -- MARON EY, DEMCHUKJ BRANDT 6 BAUMBACH 592 N Euclid Avenue Upland, CA 91786 Telephone Ire.: (714) 985 -2880 5 e�. NOTICE OF CLAIM AND CLAW In the Matter or .ne Claim of RANDY E. FREIR4IHG Claimant, v CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA and COUNTY OF SAN BER.NARDINO DUAINE E. FREVf1INf;, on behalf of RANDY E. FRVU -ITNG, hereby presents this .laim to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA and the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO pursuant to Government Code Sec. 910. 1 The name and post office address of claimant is as follows: RANDY E. FRE124IIIG 650 E Rosemead Ccurt Ontario, California 2. The post office address to which claimant desires notice of this claim to be sent is as follows: 1UIRONEY, DENCHUR, BRANDT b BAUMBACH 592 11 Euclid Avenue Upland, California 91786 3. On September 9, 1978, at Eighth Street and Hillman, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, claimant received personal injuries under the following circumstances: Claimant was a passenger in a vehicle which was travelling on Hillman in the City of Rancho Cucamonga The vehicle passed through an area on the road which was covered with water This area of the roadway is constantly underwater due to insufficient drainage and; therefore, moss is growing directly on the road. when the vehicle in which claimant was a passenger came into contact with the moss - covered area on the roadway, the driver of the vehicle was unable to maintain control of the vehicle due to the slick nature of the slime on the road, and the vehicle was; therefore, rendered uncontrollable and rolled over. 4 Had a sufficient drainage system been constructed and maintained in the area of Eighth Street and Hillman, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, water would not have remained on the roadway for extended periods of time and thereby allow moss to grow, and cause the road to be dangerous. 5 So far as it is known to claimant at the date of filing of this claim, claimant has incurred damages in the amount of $1,067.85 due to the following injuries: Lacerations to right side of face; Fracture of the facial bones; Dislocation of right eyeball; and Concussion. 6, At the time of presentation of this claim, claimant claims damages in the amount of $150,000.00. DATED: Janaury 9, 1979 C DUAI:IIE E. Fi2E1'1dING Guardian ad Litem for RANDY E. FRE19iING y�r,11 Nip +• - !` ATTN: Lauren H. Wasserman, City Manager RE: SEMI - ANNUAL REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES Enclosed is the January througlh June, 1978 semi- annual report of Environmental Health Services activities conducted for the residents - of your city He respectfully request that this letter and attached report be placed on the next Council agenda as an informational or consent item When we are advised of that date, arrangements will be made to have a representative of our Department in attendance to be recognized by you and he availahle for questioning b the Council. General Comments* This past six month period has shown considerable increase in the number of new food establishments under construction A similar increase of routine inspections is evident. It is expected that inrreasing levels of activities in all areas of environmental health concern will occur during the next six month period due to the rapid growth occurring in your area We are pleased to be able to provide these services to your city If we may be of any further services, please do not hesitate to call me at 383 -3908 The Supervising Environmental Specialist for your city is Sam Scoleri and may be reached by calling 988 -1331 The Environmental Specialist for your city is Ken Pierce. RICHARD L ROBERTS, R.S., MPH Director By �1 PHILLIP A. MINOR, R S , MPA Otvision Manager RLR: PAMa1 a Consumer Health Protection Services ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY .. -: enur,y of son BernGrdln o ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT rte,- •`•s'•�'�`s .o.•.. .. ._, 1111 East hldl Street, Building 1 San Dernaldino, CA 92415 b141183.1817 y i'f Rul,nd L Ree.dL R5, MI.H oeeno, r- V .f�! fntNOnT,n 1iI 11fN 111 $ery CM December 22, 1978 I I' CbU%TA 1CA CJ -17 Of R{,M1C . C � 1 Anu,w..nrme aim of amllnro rv.wm !.4'1: Ila! -,R I1C1!'i amen. omuro DEC '],li 1979 E R,L4M, "s ":e..nl,d.nn Rancho Cucamonga City Hall PSI lr;,;:M Lw,o Lnm efenftl.. Vuron•IV 9340 Baseline - P 0 Box 793 ,,s, 110111Xi1i213I4I5I6 un•.m Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 4 ATTN: Lauren H. Wasserman, City Manager RE: SEMI - ANNUAL REPORT - ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES Enclosed is the January througlh June, 1978 semi- annual report of Environmental Health Services activities conducted for the residents - of your city He respectfully request that this letter and attached report be placed on the next Council agenda as an informational or consent item When we are advised of that date, arrangements will be made to have a representative of our Department in attendance to be recognized by you and he availahle for questioning b the Council. General Comments* This past six month period has shown considerable increase in the number of new food establishments under construction A similar increase of routine inspections is evident. It is expected that inrreasing levels of activities in all areas of environmental health concern will occur during the next six month period due to the rapid growth occurring in your area We are pleased to be able to provide these services to your city If we may be of any further services, please do not hesitate to call me at 383 -3908 The Supervising Environmental Specialist for your city is Sam Scoleri and may be reached by calling 988 -1331 The Environmental Specialist for your city is Ken Pierce. RICHARD L ROBERTS, R.S., MPH Director By �1 PHILLIP A. MINOR, R S , MPA Otvision Manager RLR: PAMa1 a Consumer Health Protection Services ♦..w.:4jj�f. �t'1. r1_I�� lee_ _ �.a yM•L.gVr+'r•aY,/.YY ,rte... .r. -. _ P"+. %./..!S =�T' -'fir. :^s�r!!.r. . �..n±e..�.+y}:M'Cn +'PA1i. i� r twv -1.. ��.', :4•:r.,+' -�yw r �+ y.y 1 �Hd OOQ 'y Q N 1 01 OI N_ O_ CH I.i .y+ O u U iy' J N J W M k u 5 } U Q W (Y V J J a.y nr � w ooA r N c E o r vi Y U L u�v ELI � o c o p N U A V W T i V u i C L T V L W NN oc L—O w u c E i — �nA c n a n E!L L N r c L C V N T c c V O p1 N N E V C LN i Vr u r a n N01 AL V^ A .F ti•MOO A V O 9 N w D G O i i H k C 6 H H } N Q D W J t_f x -M a ■ v +� 'Fi c -CJ 1 1 1 1 b 1 1 dGlS JHrb9 �" bid l� Y CJ,OS S�tC 1 1 M m t Of Fain u HSlbH 1 1 Irl 10 W 9JJ�S� J 1 1 1 1 �Hd OOQ 'y Q N 1 01 OI N_ O_ CH I.i .y+ O u U iy' J N J W M k u 5 } U Q W (Y V J J a.y nr � w ooA r N c E o r vi Y U L u�v ELI � o c o p N U A V W T i V u i C L T V L W NN oc L—O w u c E i — �nA c n a n E!L L N r c L C V N T c c V O p1 N N E V C LN i Vr u r a n N01 AL V^ A .F ti•MOO A V O 9 N w D G O i i H k C 6 H H } N Q D W J t_f x -M a ■ r CITY or rwlilb Nic-A110i1CJ1 COPY tl;N)r4;r Nl.l, MwI /M..4- .1u.n.AUW. -H tp7p WMw Write AM. TV, APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLC IIEVERAGE UCENSEI IAT�PE(31 F UCEN�O SETS) Tel De FW ponment of Afcehellc E, ",Qge C" of 718191101 I L11 2 �- 13150Stree, 1 I) )8,9)5)6 Soclamento, Calif. 95814 'utVl 6wllIARG2fl1i „ i, :'t I. .d'i•L.G The ---'-'Id Ivnbr apprm for 'C.IAU drlcob.d ae lo0orr. I, ,,7J l.lru.S•LY ..•n..!'ITO R. NAAF(S) OF APPLICANT(S) "Clio- A11011. U. r1-:.df011A BaYnnt 5. L«nRon of B4nnet+- Number 6709 Ua:rn�l an wo. I 4��. eyn,Led un'do�SIP2,U, �] 7. TIFLIS• r TRANSACOON(S) ) I.t H e.)12,v-i a FILE e Odle. FEE UC. Coy oed Zip Code - I' 1,11j) noncan •nr. - 1. +• Coany, 11)i .. •, RECEM NO, C61f):, TOTAL S - 6 IF Nembn Licemed, - 0 6 B.co Slow Type of Lcenw - 7 Are Nem)we bnid. 8. AIOJ n __ Cry uIgia f6L 61SLL : g Add', i(f dRerent (ram 5)- Number and Shrn s tLLL_ i, .t .,l : t.. IfwNrnf 9. Hare yaa wer been coI ided of o lebtty! • • TO Hose 1 , 7oa ner .:ehted o.rP d d.e pa.)fan of I%. Alrohore {, Be+etop. C0.1101 Act or rly.lbYom of the lobtirp to the Ad? D&pertnultl pop. 11. E.pldn a ^yE5^ om. to 4eme 9 er 10 an or, anochment .6111, doll be deemed pwf of Ibn oppGmfoa Ili. Appluont agrees (a) th.t airy monoysr tmploTed in on-wb 6lenod pemul w01 1,m. a0 dw (b) that he wdl not Wolote or cwee or permit to be violated of ete 'Yam of the Allohdtc M+ereatiene of o bcen:ae otd _ oqe Canhel Act. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Cueny of .,Ali 0.aw"a"140 Dab a.ew r.+lrr N rtq. ... rw .1r .�..wr .er.er• I..r., ..r.M ti .err+ nl w M or +re..n+. r r N Y a..trr. r r ....,.e.. e.w N M gN.rt rrM+.w rr1 L M Iwr.r. r.hY1 M' we..bM ,. W. Y. 1.irr. w N eiNl, rT 4r i v ,w1 I. evr .A4wt, W r Lwt LLwr w~i.r� � �I w.e w1 Y N I.r P,rro e.,rw Wr tit pl e.l .r Iww. rY v..r �1.w. ly Nt ..r eNw ...tn.,r, r re wrr. r ..Y.w, O,wu 4 M .ry41 w,1w ar a,r,w4 Ir .VJ ti rW.wt • n.e.. e.M rn.A.. M ... r .i V. e. n.+.lr .rNw 4 r r.Ir w ✓..Ir ... wrrr N . Iw w r fYe r .e.rr .rw.1 ..r. �. er .rN+.nr M WI .A Il,r Or..wrr w 4 .r r rW4.. /,Nw.r .r r N wrr Mll il�... r Mtw. rr nIMU N ti..lr, In e.t �, Nw wFwr r.r Y .Wnr er rer .Y wins w .Y iwr. w. y pry YLr Y Y e,rrtw.r 14. APPLICANT 1 SIGN HERE mcb APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR IS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County eF p,y Ir.sw ..•Nq N .wMr. W .w4. ., .errs. w.... i4... rrwr r ..... I1, w I I,..a. ueN..t..,., y. ry,rLN 4 r1. e.y wn.Ao wi.er r h l...e. In y b y.,N nN,. w1..fr w ...w1w Nw wrr.r.l ....,M W r. W ,.rrr .w. rwwtw wr .rr r ..ip 4r •rMw +.1.Yr 4 1IN ..iL .b awr.r r w ..w r .Mir Y'MI w� no Not Write rfelow Thbt Line) For Deportment Dw Only "AAaehedt Q R.. wd.d none., O FthNre dp a t•.1: i C) COPIES MAUD Ji LGJJJ Raman ob Fn of Iaid of Ofrw on I t Wt.. Reoe:PA w • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO% City Council PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR LAND DIVISION 73 -0598 Release Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the amount of $3.000 Owner: Robert A. and Sandra G. Suhr 8989 Orange Street Rancho Cucamonga, Colifornla 91701 - Location: Wilson Avenue between Carnelian Avenue and Beryl Street NOTE: The road construction has bean approved as being in accordarce with the Road Improvement Plans and it Is recommended that the instrument of Credit and Agreement be released. 0 INTER - OFFICE MEMO DATE January 4, 1979 e FROM JOSEPH P COLLEY, Land Development Engr. PHONE 383 -2502 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SURVEYOR DEPARTMENT TO LLOYD HUBBS, City Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBJECT MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAP311GA This item is being forwarded to you for presentation to the City Council: LAND DIVISION 73 -0598, Release Instrument of Credit and Agreement In the amount of $3,000.00. Located on-Wilson Avenue between Carnelian Avenue and Beryl Street in Rancho Cucamonga. Owner Robert A. and Sandra G Suhr 8989 Orange Street Rancho Cucamonga Instrument of Credit and Agreement accepted by the Board of Supervisors on April 29, 1975 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended that the instrument of Credit and Agreement be released J SEPH COLLEY Land Development Engineer � P -g. COUNTY SURVEYOR _ JPC:St:ls 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9002 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the west side of Sapphire Street at Pumalo Street, north of Banyan OWNER: San Higuol Land Company - 202 Fashion Lane, Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92680 Performance Bond (Road) $110,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being In accordance with he Road Improvement Plana and it is recommended what the roads be accepted The improve - vents Include -urb and gutter, pavane walls, and street scans .� t, N I ■ g� 9 .d 9 9s M "b6 z og H gig i ar la S; f e L l iiiii 5 }l al�R tR R'! L}y•!!t �`i rl� }rl'a lrll,�:{ r>f rS� iR1RhliR gallF yRRt by kl} .S.iaf (tltr t,at Life , ;u,f lrh I 4ii alrsret r. ss tas � MiSitllibbIk M tItRti r C • CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 i TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Fngineer i SUBJECT; CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9003 - Accept roads and release bond Located vest of Sapphire and east of the Cucamonga Wash, north of Banyan OWNER: Sunflower Ladd Company, Inc - 202 Fashion Lane, Suite 101 Tustin, CA 92680 Performance Bond (Road) $46,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb and gutter, pavings, walls and street signs. W =i r 1 s TRACT N0. 9003 lx la] caax 11 a 11. I]Ixllalxa a.w°.rwxM.1 s[Ix:I Ilmin]IM IF I r611M? lot a L Iv &a ]l L[anfl Inl]llm .=1111M I] w a Ix m r a wx IIIr K KC= V ]u awmUa m 11 ILLaRnI a69 III] I _ «0.0 Tk 'FfiT7 as i Jd • -11 t i I , LN `, fl l ,O�'r..` +aar'w�io -` •'^T- ai +nT ~��' � C ; )b 'FfiT7 Jd , LN `, fl l ,O�'r..` +aar'w�io -` •'^T- ai +nT ~��' � + jt 1:l Y i it `� -- — -- — — - -1 - 0 C ; )b �tt�_�n.yri,v a.� �•u ;y::�rk:1 `Rr -a, _ >.. . . ..... . .. .. ._ _•� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR r TRACT 9116 - Accept Roads and Release Bond Located on the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Jasper Street i OWNER: Gary G. ML11eY - 23625 East Haple• Springs Drive Dimond Bar, CA 91765 Performance Bond (Road) $32,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Imorovement Plans and it is recommended that the bond be released since the roads were accepted into the City Maintained Road 1{ System on 7/19/78. The improvements include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs r NLf1l pL fr[L LI TRACT NO. 5.16 N LMYAG0. Aw remm,urr p M tiX/N!r p 51N sIRNNybq ACPW A SYLOIY /STY p M! "if NR✓ p for S. ROCK q, tiyi yONL[ /pyL,IIIO ASSOC/ALTN t AY05, AS I'R YLR R2tl6Yp IN N 1, IArf 40, pYMS RK ,, p Mf LOwf1 p SW 1lRNIR3.10, SLALf p ""N a. AYp[IS <N LNCIN!lRNC ca SL/tC I•• fC AOKYS<R on t�.. i/NYr1rJ)L A�s•.lN NN Lrnb/mr ✓NmwRrC Of i)1 IwP M. v />I>J,Lf .n prJMhM Oas.✓ L fY,YiO.M loin. <'Ny. R.rN1/ah rNgL,�r ICL /ay N/ mr / /Lw le/:mvA,M,rMV..I[•1SXehqq Nm /Aa/gyryd A[L IL>l Ab✓Lw r /h RmIIYR(/..m ✓1tl/eY /I/,Lrq W[tI L/NY�N NYn /.Vgff nan..anPwv"iH/LY t .Ili /n /a Yb, N q RCL OOS, d•ucbr lkd AA.nwY,I aYliY, lV f T M•rrl[i nnY+ie / . nMi'.r AIV C {Y/ ✓Aia 1 NnsP4 ✓Gn .,ub R.>wme OR,n d /Ar fmN/i Jrm1M- i •OSt Mriwha [YrY,y Se//mM [Lie e a c ei AcaM/ wr i M A; MLMSrdAaaa.hr sNM ASmtlr ea. rl Yvmin Co-nly s..ep -a nL.H [wi UP C L)Y 1µbM Liv�I, L.qM 1W,M/ NL rrrw AN - S MYrI N.a.W nO; ' pq, rl9r /RY YseNRR Hy(r ✓L. � H'nMlO r✓lYR NIJ'rT0.YL /W q' .1R41•YP_VY / � LNA•YOr/ �� rY lr r 7MY Hl% Llm1. �YAIL -- IfII,I • -mam.� orMnl4we,Y • r) 19j( `• • S z { + � < � / I•�k i� f I. r. ih. D �•pf 1J I II If. Imo,• +w • I 'YY A Yf, W I E I i i I ' 4•" V l Ll S o- I r I tai NsmY' f _ .r • ��_�ImML1 SiL`,'`1� .,I91 ROAD / _ ! HULSTL r/r/cary 2' ra+r K• ROAD p � � • 1i:: \• � `i ter'+. �i..frm I 1 i I I b/ rH. S CS :LJ C J1rN>i ' r •1 oar ..:y+v I I 1 1/ nulK•�Y r QJ . i[.1-ir'i. ' Ln CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 1 DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council C FROMs Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer fr t SUBJECT: C04SENT CALENDAR TRACT 9320 - Accept roads and release bond Located between Amethyst and Hellman Avenue north of Banyan Street and south of Hillside Road OWNER: Levis Homes of California 924 West 9th Street Upland, CA 91786 Performance Bond (Road) $74,000 NOTE: The road construction has been app'oved as being In accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, paving, walls and } street signs. a i off •,�• r r. r 1StN 13FY L� • • 1. L NTM }i }T N •�� `•I �E r u m o ElSel \v' Qa �y 133Y15 NOI1Y, _ILr— 7� O° t r i t " i i i''J: •' 2� l♦ f 1� 'n gal S H � I , �.T -.• �`t kf • �.,..._ N ..-.lip • Al .4 ;� •l�L�� Y .. ._ .. atr`? 4. ♦ = —° wow :> _ ♦ t r i ? � L t n', I�t' L t Elsi n "tit t1�� -w}11� 3NN3R. • .• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9341 - Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located vest of Hellman Avenue and south of Banyan Street at Lemon OWNER: Levis Homes of California 924 West 90r Street - Upland, California 91786 performance Bond (Sewers $15,000 performance Bond (Water) $26,000 performance Bond (Road) $56,000 NOTE: The sanitary sever and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 7/7/78. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls, and street sigt.s. ~'t `K' B .w mr((r / a /ins I RA CT NO. 934 IN UN/NCORPOPAT£D TfRRIIORY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BCRNARDINO WING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOTS ? AND J, &OCK II, O"CUCAMOAGA WMESTCAD ASSUCti T.ON, AS P-'R MVP RECORDCC W WOK O PACC 46, OF MAPS, RfC07DS OF THE MATS` OF SAN BfRNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AAOREASEN CNOINECRING CO SC41C I'• 60• JUN£ 1976 /rrv/r PACT NO t9 /J t/ 11 � '—•wry 'ReAN.A3I'— .�4_PrSL nYllUt \'.f ! f!!lllyw 'n?r V r� .7 ^!'. iml•t� a �� ^,. r. Z \I� ��Jn , �•� t r '' qry. >i.1ie�,�r:ii' "L� \`'8. .lie ••, Pf) � , p /I 14 i N � v/4 Fr ♦ur .r4�rI01' /Ar ✓nA njN• // I /) A wIy J•! a b1 J. Jry A'b1) Lu TRACT 710. N I N) ■s'� AS TRACT ND a 01. ji Frr )rgar / w ,/ I IS .L� /. AY(NUC II m�Ij 'ir.'lir� ^tY3R tt',�•'1 /rl .� YS �i'iwr i y r�•����`{ Iii ° /! �� I ? lTfi • W I t.:. y W Iz i J) to l t y tt i; I i j t I I F�ZY u awl I bra i I i J3 ` IryNtYr W b � : = a DoJS 7 " :3 jut tOZA J) u'I i Y :4�ii� r rn, erwrq N.y s1UFw n /M r r.rb d M1 1 r'q.1 1 , ape" PAl.wJ I.'A r• . 11 1 IA1 0111, J p111p1 /r rA, r.P of nl h e I W 11,11, W&,, O n let It's I.' I" I... MI M(.. .. NsI, , 1. 0.0 rr0 Pf f //Wf ' leP M rare m /Ar /4n1 p1/rr /un /I )dr b/ J.n, Mtru rlArrrw Nrnn. 11'0.11.1 J 11 lmMJl're M 1p, If t —1- 1.11 .1 4I w npprswrJ /4J, tl'rmhr I'rInIO /Irr)rIn/ r J11M w,a/w• f 111., ✓fh), IIAfIrNI 51rella 1, /Y0mhk JNMM/,,. w Yrrl( .1 NI NLu r.tbekO'rAr O / /.nM 1 !N fl.nry US t'J. — w I S 1", 11111 O4 JJ ,I/I (pAJGC ! ef, -e "a"y f✓err!fat �._ IfI I e Al'0•r I1I fnn/y fr.gwa ur.'rN "A ! ffle '.41b/ h.w/ f.nrrwa LIN Cw! M !I/ %•,II Pert /rr rrrl/ Ir !r/ Fp1rI wr, mIr el ew )rA, Ju wJlo )u, .11 rn )rsr) lal/ Dy Pf J4ar rtf .11 NJI /I 14 i N � v/4 Fr ♦ur .r4�rI01' /Ar ✓nA njN• // I /) A wIy J•! a b1 J. Jry A'b1) Lu TRACT 710. N I N) ■s'� AS TRACT ND a 01. ji Frr )rgar / w ,/ I IS .L� /. AY(NUC II m�Ij 'ir.'lir� ^tY3R tt',�•'1 /rl .� YS �i'iwr i y r�•����`{ Iii ° /! �� I ? lTfi • W I t.:. y W Iz i J) to l t y tt i; I i j t I I F�ZY u awl I bra i I i J3 ` IryNtYr W b � : = a DoJS 7 " :3 jut tOZA J) u'I i Y :4�ii� O ry• . • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9742 - Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located on the vest side of Hellman Avenue at Apricot Avenue OWNER: Levis Roses of California 924 West 9th Street Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Sever) $21,000 Performance Bcnd (Water) $26,000 Performance Bond (Road) $70,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewor an., water systems were approved by the Cucamsnga County 7atcr District on 7/7/78. The road construction h.s haen approved as being In accordance with the kond Improvement plans and it is recommended tnat th- toed* be accepted The Improve- ments ,nelude •,urb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls, acd street ciguo. C L i- tt 2 t �, Vy o� ;� _ +R-jea L �tAi -0- -0 Liws i(! 'K [=L_'"4•i:r +ii ? Iu0 R�:_� a`� � .� ti a. O. tom. t a]• -,•� ��� st Its- -• a = ,_ ,/ _, c 5 '�• s. E��'.- : =f•`" _� -• f.cw!a:3''. �l' ��ir.� Y7 .. / E.:..•^ �' � =i ,,y� t��E T a/v z� - t... / 1, �t / ♦t ply` .j ST � Ca 'j• ' .d i tier z//✓ 3ws( t -- -- - - -- ' -211 0 M774-MM-47 • • o-%✓ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9343 — Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located on the vest side of Masada Street at Victoria OWNER: Levis Homes of California 924 West 9th Street — Upland. California 91786 Performance Bond (Sever) $20,000 Performance Bond (Water) $23,000 Performanco Bond (Road) $60,000 NOTE: The sanitary sever and water systems were approved by the Cucmonga County Water District on 1/3/79. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls, and street signs. y. CC 1 t� I ♦ f /O[I / /[ 1 Cl�� 1 CDZB I ON 1 1.-70"/1 � 1 n C .°r zt (/^''�J• i V � � `h !' � -7 !!� '� n � be��c •per V Z 1�1��Z *d.�yl1 yr�� 7 tt:�1 zt � yUti y q S =.t a � .� •Y f� � � N�� W 2 � r• � <�'ry. f X20 �< •: � :,• ,i'�:'• ," . , > ash; to Za�� ie ?ei C° 5 1� 1n d :• »r 4`i2�ztai�g4a��:���ir.�d• d �� roo. :j 3 ,x l ?it! t' Y•, , N n• n � "n.0• `J O rear —Ai �• �,/ �tty 111 x 3• 'G+I� •i �' i '.L�LJ n [ r2 1. ..,. " � CL rte. ` ,ci �11t 1 r � t � i7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9344 - Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located giant of Center Street at Monte Vista Street OWNER: Levis llomea of California 924 Went 9th Street Upland, California 91786 - Performance Bond (Sever) $23,000 Performance Bond (Water) $28,000 Performance Bond (Road) $64,000 NOTE: The road construction, water system and sanitary sewer systems have been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement Pla• and approved by rho Cucamonga County Water District 'rho improvements include curb, and gutter, paving, ?IJewalks, walla, street signs, t pipes, valves, manholes and various other appurtenances. N I y i :.tY'. i•J ^`y..., .�X'}rw".__�f_Y,: J„..' =t:: e4q +: xr s ` - _... �_ $ a- �i,�• --��- .tcxuY- xJgx_3 __ = i� ��ui e�it°• 1 �i �? d �; {.� lJJr[t YOrsJ���tn-------l�_�/1tf{I � < ;: srza vNy 1 IDY ;;x a 5 D1 u ^ �•�a�$SSrb,8?�yPy�YP� _ ^y 1Y x r i'.�ta¢e �°d1I�' i "� -+ica: r� •�� 4ti : � t-4i ,�Y� `A9 .r . -r C _; .r,y,• Cer N Si REY��o4a74A —YJAM- �,o � w, .t s...I ♦ 51ss�. FIJ-,� F 0.&J —�� i • J b`� �6t ON W¢� ` rF + • A a N.j` :� r •1 ^ tie: sa_ � .iw —r. ooh •• i • �':� tf %' "� s t } .r eoo h �t �{{ z i ♦ + _ 3t aQV `= �� -�r� `t!{. 2'l��Jm. a.. ^Q9 r.�.:.: e _ �a• t rF � 4 • i ' J it � � �{ � t{ 6 `It••a lra l'-tC1x' ", I``i `ice ]ON]AY r YM •&21N2D ' * • aar„ �' iy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FRa4: Lloyd Uubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9345 - Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located south of 19th Street on Cartilla Avenue OWNER: Lowls Homes of California 924 West 9th Streot Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Sewer) $0,000 Performance Bond (Water) $21,000 Performance Bond (Road) $52,000 NOTE: The sanitary ewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 1/9179 The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement Plane and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The imprme- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. N•ny ax n/M 6at. _I r yr� „4steri ,YtN PLI NO. ISIS Pot ra/13 Lot "p J TO tkwift T"T 99'13 _RtCrdywtt W v<EV_.?a{� Y i of � N 4 4 � � Y i aI ti (• hr O Y tlj/ (4s TRACT NO. 9345 IN UNINCORPORATED 7CRR17CRY Or SAN BERNARD /NO COUNTY — B£ /NC A SUBDIVISION Or POR71ONS Of THE SE MI$ Of THE NC !/I OF SECTION JS. T IN. A 7 IT., S B D N. RECORDS Of ME COUh rr Or SAN BERNARDINO, STATE Of CALIFORNIA. Nta, ANA4EASGV Em;1NE£RING Co. SCALE Y• 60' JULY 1976 M Nrlq N N plll N Jhlw• /r (b /I//wI N tr n2 A/N '..M MNONK ) /r/I q/ I!i fe/•19 aIMtare If,.". /4/hu w0. •.! tr6Ml l% hI p'/Mp /ewr(./.h /f LI✓/Iylr La it" ur e/ o /ur ,/ NfMN, ' m rae/rr " Ira, I tIrea to N .A w /rw r(h. I/ 'll 'N. Y/ "1", - CALC.AVtM6L ' • I./.sNJS wu.•rrtiY /IM✓IJ nNN. o. ..I /N rtI N/Il,6ffNKI Nd, 0l.drr/ J,.,*., d/r /Iq, trlrr w/d Jw /re.•11(IJN.' "NU Nh4.0 /JM..r. Y % TRACT t INi.IJrr /t /uII 1e•Irtt/ � NQ 9/2/ MrIII, a lhM1nl rn IrhC NAN I Na � a f saki/ frees Ins PN:•NIM CwVr F+.rNn rrst I to -¢ ;v J.. uJ NIN 4N i�r..,lrl a eat gdlllN 6.Wrrg arl0ert lm 0r4'91.4"k •t• /m,. Lh /.IN ."I.". hn[rIJ. �IhI�J rNtl nN K'.iJ r..Nt r417yt(w!..J r/s. 6a1 t<hetr 6.w' t(v Zor. .7rr r.. ?.. :, '• t: t' !n n:,r7 tl •criJq N•ny ax n/M 6at. _I r yr� „4steri ,YtN PLI NO. ISIS Pot ra/13 Lot "p J TO tkwift T"T 99'13 _RtCrdywtt W v<EV_.?a{� Y i of � N 4 4 � � Y i aI ti (• hr O Y tlj/ (4s I • ,• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FRAY: Lloyd Hubbs, City Enpineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9378 — Nelease of Bond Located on the northeast corner of Hillside Road and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Chavanne Realty, inc. 4010 Palos Verdes Drive North, Suate 101 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Performance Bond (Water) $39,000 NOTE: The sanitary water aystm was approved by the Cuc=cnga County Water Di�trlct on 1/3/79. ■ O 1 �J 1 �Yf V ?O C� °uu _o uo o< ei <o 4 r o. O =� N Js2 • oos U z -< UR YOQ a? <u- 5 oof° 0 u •< ui u <osT 1NSO0p oucu 0;..4 s 1-iri0 001.2 On- 3 • � N,. T ti I' pli�`,- '�:':��%: i"�4ti.`!:: -=a1f �{1%M.y °.' -��":'., �Yi.� .: '. _.,r .a _ -_ . ... ..:•i_. _ ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: Janunry 15, 1979 TO: City Council PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9379 — Release of Bond Locattd on the east side of Archibald and north of Hillside OWNER: Chavanne Realty, INc. 4010 Palos Verdes Drive, North, Suite 101 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 Performance Bond (Water) $20,000 NOTE: The sanitary water systems was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 1/3/79. �s =a :o o: �o a Z as ¢ao`Z(u -i m�Wso Qom LL O LIj° "4 =m8 r s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO% City Council FROM% Lloyd Hubbv SUBJECT: C04SENT CALENDAR TRACT 9401 — Accept Roads and Release bond Located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Lemon Avenue OWNER: Olympus Pacific Corporation , 2110 East Katella Avenue Anaheim, CA 92803 Performance Bond (Road) $274,000 NOTE: The road cop"*•-ction has been approved as being in accora'ance with the Road Improvement Plan and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. N�i��,- ,+=VYy-•�} .f+?�'pt•,..+`b :: °t'i`�;v^ I`a ;r.r: --Y e - : `� . _ ._ ` .. _- ,.... - ... _ I NJ LL11 ,�.ri,lYis r. •p7 r. .. {� `•. s•J �..1•y.• '•j; •h`�;IS���:S A1: TRACT N0.9401 w °'.' " "' THE UJINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF COUNT. OF SAN BERNAMM,STATE OF CALIFORNIA ArAV A lulTASAw 0 /AP6IlAn Nl0r5 L,) / AAq X. APM f.VW A r,a Sl AA "'PtASAI -N WAKVACa1r O)Ag SNOWNO A MAPOF MOTHILL FVMrLESS CA:Vrr CM AM13fAAC1"Z,AS ACA y.v ACC"ItP M' F.tl1 10.1 yr.S PAC! 71,AFCAfAS N SAVIN14.0040 CCP/1r JP kAPP.o ASSOC4rrs, /VC , A lHllRurc .YN 1:1 ri Jb II Nt ACT _Y— �•wnuA ,VM4 A� :.i'• � 1 A 59 00 4 ll p IS _ H W 11 .� 11 .v.'li lr'. �r:r.. �rt�j•i�. +v't'ii, �S'�. '�I• ^. •!�. y: fir. ''`J��.y Qv� +ti? r •• �� •• I �1 ., •S {• bi:` ll:Ni Ce(R, A\yy. TRACT NO 9401 THE S�tB.:(E'ORPORATED TERRITORY OF ou'rY OF S A/ BERN O STATE OFaCALFORVIAF I lMlifa14NI.0./.Vir(y{<ASLfI)A S,W"WAMpO Wplun+, f¢ ! oSilpay igy/i COy /aNY'S ilK! N0.1 a i O!A` ba/ IILPIIIO /N /OIT l e.I /p/. IK i/, A'FLOIIS N f1Nl /I.Vlrmp LWNII II eAaV.y A{f0. Lb lli, .NC , NorllrlFl, brc c /. {:f; p l: w4t /•nil.; f I 1 rb � . / � s u'.:.• .. a I i7 I fi � IN f, 1 I2w�p ~s:. iswi ts�i. i•�. r',':.:w..r ` t .o••rr. r..n_ LewlLw iasa._r � /n1 a• •.mow~ r !. rr�I t I � / h :Rrr y Fdf. . I• 4 � tl I , w � w• � !N t e - ,� - , � IS 4t •1 j 3l � =nom) ur]O wp Sr n i tl) SA• p V wn "Li Z v rr'{':ir �J:• �yfli.Y -.r / �' ... w.r� { c — '_•I• �n���.�r__ _ ,f I�^ ...... t I � as f: e•.•• •onw•r .wrr 3P /S )O+ _.. Q� AINF 1 /, t1 = z9 � !o to !' :e �l : ` ::zli+• 1'� ,. Nr.r•s.r rs ww i f 'C t ���n. {+ {a.;1�;<Ir t^� ^• -n;w :ti :•� iP -"wr,;�v>•.: <.. ;f,.....,. .. -' - /.•.. �+f.. ..•i.. is •,.. $r :i ♦ -•T ".� •:/o. ^' "` �•IS $,�: {:..•,��r•.. • +!Sp` A , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Rubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: `CONSENT CALE4DAR TRACT 9586 - Release of Bonds Located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 19th Street OWNER: Levis limes of California 924 West 9th Street _ Upland. California 91786 Performance Bond (Sever) $33,000 performance Bond (Water) $63,000 NOTE: The sanitary never and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 1/9/79. 3U /4.: A I[ _ 9 7 TRACT N0. 1.1113 G• , {•G{{ IN THE COUNTY OF S1N DEPNAPDINO Vw(S I. LuL•IV.Gei V { Nr. i G M q G f[ -a If. • [. :i KIfR OI {4 {LIW ia..O. LS {TL Lr 4�IW 1.. Y(sOtl ( { { {o[I(IH IML ,frrr, rrn <G.4..irt :Wa/1 urt sru.<r a -.• .'— tit •/4�l(1LL Il C /4w• n n l 4 4 ra M a Y { 1 �l'a• 1-- z..'re.( �L 1 T•.a:�j. -.nr �' °c•� _�' � j r !'.rX= 1 •�ie od_ .••. • «c uxa j• nuc: i 5 i ` i ry` {I�lt 1 it i n"er�{ 4 •e 4 ti er<r .L' �"� .•� /` 7 �i N /NETFEN7f/ SJREET j •• v rM tR m i.( av un n nr la n• nl.a (•01'm• Y \ {i [r (4R b. Mlr. r{ . (O• %t t. arO. •L' r•G( r ( II nrpi G I • - Im¢•SG •R r e o va wn, vr:m r.t.l. unf r� o - w.mn .�rmuf rn{wo�uT L• Tw. rin. e {zra ..tom(. I..ly :r(•r Lltw rr.wrt frm • un• :. sr h :.. •.u[rni a no[ fm u LA.. . . r r - .-n •, r uwa.r. fVr a. n:r[[Y.m w iuve .. c. [, wm rt. II ' VJ( rW[a• .ltl rn••I{Y IVIUi[e. t.r•r.nl .vu:.a mur. ua Nov 17 IS11 V r.T Ml .1 L: {. /•/.+nr. <.Y _nY w•iY/! .G/w I•�•l�I lWM bl _.21.%L� . - 1.i I..11t .Pq•.P4 LIIi 11T rl I V• .fnMt r- �� G :I[l. th[AJ tl ::{! YILL SC n I 11V 1. Ta rT _i.T - -T arin tl iru r:.an f...re•. F -•tL(� � -TMa. Y Iq:Gilr (: 1Yi ......... .wn -IMY. r_ •`• !' . IOlf.i[i , .•1 • •. , (. ••r[! Mtl. £�.1 N�� AS -� Ca�j�— r � u f tnnn 'TRA, CT M. 956 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO rvu\rmo- a { ro.ao n :a .r er uc.0 u. :Yii \lt ] N•T. Y•[r "/ry:. {Y lWL': \0 VI.:I {t. •\Derr { {uocum u.p .u/C M jI V , h Z d r rnt M i of i It J1 ( ter'• 2 \1 ., 3,n2 v n "N} •/ y�.�.- 7 1 I I 'I NOV i 7 7 _ � i 1 / •• K vM' V wi Q•♦ I w7 •/ y�.�.- 7 1 I I 'I NOV i 7 7 _ � i • .• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9587 — Release of Bonds Located south of Highland Avenue and cast of Haven Avenue OWNER: Lewis Homes of California 924 West 9th Street Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Sever) $24,000 Performanco Bond (Water) $26,000 NOTE: The sanitary sever and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Hater District on 1/3/79. 41 ':ALE: ! • GU TRAC "'T INN. 9537 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN 5ERNARDINO [:ra r [Vnlnnw b r KRIP b fla v\ y f[n IP I[, :pAwt1110XA. YK[ I Y1f. iY Yruly1K IRtit[i, Ir :M CDYTr q [Y Ypr N:[i. [:.R q f•410M1.. IN•frRf O•fRVf rWp.f il[f K4n fn r e • Irn rul. i..".• • c.[. unl • ii[� <�i[iafii:ii:u mwii wvi[[. wuv m[rni .anti 1.11[' in sl `I:urrurilc..:iu: nl a rw q Ru raunP r nW a urn. P r. r.:.u• u[m rtrY. rums r.ln w rYfP +.c s. um Iw w w. nT [W[d, PYff DM1[Mlfi IrOI[.RO, •.r f. IKIC <1r1 WIIGIK [n•KI YR. •ll fYfT W 11 1prf. 'alu •ar.n ..•Iwo[frYW4.IW <4wrinal, l�V,,.��,. —,_ • c [ >•111 P ))/1 /11 TIL. .1! Y 111. . n[.. q T cee I..Rrru <aPrr sw.Rwa aKwr ,. reri+e r eo.I. ur�jrr cq.rt wfn. Y'[ Rr•su m ' — .. �r•cy. la r rr/ •C[�GlLS.�fC_ nJirr _ at } """�y/ /ya'Lt' r• r 'r•�• " �jM is I ^�e \1t 1 � � rY � // tji �r •ti NV j 1. i � IUi�•V� �` t Mr k 4° {JtJJ,• Inn 3 m 3 1.1911 1 lo 1 r ; 1� i �7 Z a ` N �.S r.=`e —• 1�tt tl "� ll 1 • � 1b w IT .......<:_ c _ 13r fY t r `17 rrs� 5 • [ y�, ���: I•r[[. �P �• •` \• `i��.i�- .a% ✓:fir [• y <Iy.<.'Z^y� \ .✓ ✓' • is �• r.r � \ • • XNP.r � _1!J'[� :CL ../^ nlfAy r +sl�•.' ^3 -7 M�l.�al£"J .; 1Liipr)/" N// _ 4 �ni� "f�T•Y� l<T•P T•{ •Rn flr[ q [I<TIP 1 <. i[IK r ^� _ YY J. Tw.w fl• Wf r[• f[l: r0. fIR. IJ t•M } Y[CIC q f�T r• I� �_ [O•Mr w m 111. •K[[ O•U 4<iUf b W ?iq��iy'J— JjJ'1' G'n. 4YRT11 � 1� s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Rubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9676 - Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located on the southwest coiner of L'.ion Avenue and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Chevron Construction Company 1512 11th Street, 0101 Santa Monica, California 90401 eerformance Bond (Sever) $18,000 , Performance Bond (Water) $28,000 Performance Bond (Road) $80,000 NOTE: The sanitary sever and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on 1/7/79. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement Plans and it is recommended that the made be accepted. The Improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. i • � .j.l i �. ! � �• ° 1 id n a Fv s. ./.... Kr. OYeuOL 1 4T4L6T 1// ; — •%� :too "I 74 `l —r--sa i C j� EI o QI j i 5 m 0. t 2 .1 it i � ` o �'t f 1 `�': _ '��,' � -e:.:. • �+r' :• der i:t f Cx IN •rl, t �'•� S.t :i iG .o E as R t' of .+ .. n ..} R 1.:i,'T�J .G/IL•i•— w i 1. K33f :4. " n 3" N N1 f wf' ' 1 +r 60 uru s m s l.11n TRACT ACT DT 9 i IN THE COUNTY OF BAN IIERNARDTNO / K n . W »Illrls N �. 4LK 1!. C4R i. X11 5� tK ( T . `u `fn » n`M r. i`.N it`, 1.`tK nlllr VI tNNI 4[O I. IN fPMIr. M.00It . &IIOCI(11! INC. •IIVC .tll C� (jam . I » 11! M lI..IKS. nu1K n x•n•u•t s.... n. raneru•! I., I. X n. !ms n ru YYtaYO. •u I �• +'K.. ......X N!. rn . uYr IN ' f�4 i • � .j.l i �. ! � �• ° 1 id n a Fv s. ./.... Kr. OYeuOL 1 4T4L6T 1// ; — •%� :too "I 74 `l —r--sa i C j� EI o QI j i 5 m 0. t 2 .1 it i � ` o �'t f 1 `�': _ '��,' � -e:.:. • �+r' :• der i:t f Cx IN •rl, t �'•� S.t :i iG .o E as R t' of .+ .. n ..} R 1.:i,'T�J .G/IL•i•— w i 1. K33f :4. " n 3" N N1 f wf' _ e. V. ��''S..'Y.� .. .�.....• .. _ . I... ... •t • r"" 1 � OJUn?.R/ PLAT i q t' x tr i - i • � .j.l i �. ! � �• ° 1 id n a Fv s. ./.... Kr. OYeuOL 1 4T4L6T 1// ; — •%� :too "I 74 `l —r--sa i C j� EI o QI j i 5 m 0. t 2 .1 it i � ` o �'t f 1 `�': _ '��,' � -e:.:. • �+r' :• der i:t f Cx IN •rl, t �'•� S.t :i iG .o E as R t' of .+ .. n ..} R 1.:i,'T�J .G/IL•i•— w i 1. K33f :4. " n 3" N N1 f wf' L�- L a3p e. V. ��''S..'Y.� .. .�.....• .. _ . I... ... • r"" � OJUn?.R/ PLAT L�- L a3p 0. 1N ]N[ c 0 u a 11 a1 5 A a 01 a 1. p 1.0 Kw . S IaJSIM v . g 11W a l91 S. M= 12 CaLaC- . WN]SI].a .IWC... am. It SU MM 1. ,ca. ! ar N . /.0 41, KCC S or Sul KXaWR ,aC) Ir MIFMI. 'I 1LMl ,� I•.fp d LOT 8 SW CI ] a S .S]«I.I]a r.tlW[.S Uaala. Miami& 10 10.1 110[�n fit — _ _ r:. 63 !L 76 ` "a ]y Nr __rrr e a a• ._ .r, 1'S a'?I'�.a .Y`iy � •--a:t' ' —•bra" rrnmf- v— 051 _ 60 m © 65 74 b — • r.. _., 1 •rinak '� 1r � . �trstr• a n � m as © 4 52 59 0I b 72 � m °° ;, `oI 053 se b -) V 67 — .�'•�szns.71— €+ —j +:-. : n.nw !1 i"L 3 o °7 frill X L 57 (`-� •. GB u• y ..� .�,.u. la _ •._ 56A0 vl 69 e9 E p r]ri —:A I,p _� A � o-.9 �..n� Y2 �' ` i •d7�: .j �'.,I�— 5 ° 3 2 N u• ..•:.- \yyv .]a Iw s• swu a •1 .. -��. Z f .� 1. — t P: is ,I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMO iANDJN Date: January 15, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack lam, Director of Community Development Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 103 -67 - PARES - An appeal of the Planning Commis- sion decision regarding a zone change from A -1 -5 (limited agricul- ture) to C -1 (limited comnrcial) for propertfec located on the south side of 19th Street. approximately 1,500 feet east of Hermosa The applicant filed for a zone change from the City co April 10, 1978. The applicant's purpose was to convert an existing residence, the Albert House, into r restaurant which would al:a serve liquor. The site is presently zoned A -1 -5; the surrounding zoning is A -1 -5 and R -1. To the east and the mouth are ccisting mingle family homes The applicant has submitted a detailed report for the Council's review of the zone change. He describes quite specifically the c:aracteriatics of the restaurant, the menu, the decor, market location and consideration, senting capacity, design and layout, even the china, glass and silvet tableware. The site is presently occupied by the Albert House, a proposed historical site, which to approximately 73 yearn old, the structure represents the Queen Anna style of architecture, incorporating elements of shingle style and colonial revival Since the construction of the house, it has been used as a residence and still is The prepared General Plan for the arc^ indicates the land use as low density residential (2 -5 unite per Fross acre) The development to the east and south conforms to General Plan designation. It should be noted that in the Planning Commission's deliberation on the proposed General Plan, much concern and study was given to the commercial possibilities of 19th Street. The reason for this close scrutiny was due to the various illegal commercial establishments that have cropped up on 19th Street recently. It was the Com- mission's determination that 19th Street should remain residential In character and only permit the commercial developments now under construction which were all concentrated at intersictlons At the time of the zone change hearing, the Comissfon denied the request. The Commission's denial -me based primarily on the principle that an approval of commercial zoning would result In "spot zoning" encouraging a breakdown of the integrity of the residential existing and proposed. It to significant to note that while the Commission recommended denial of the zone change, they ware supportive to the idea of maintaining the Alberc House as an historical structure because of its historical significance. At the hearing there van a large group of adjacent property owners, all of whom voiced opposition to the proposed conversion, bemuse of the projected impact upon their neighborhood Zone Change No. 103- 67 January 15, 1979 Page 2 of traffic, noise, conflict in land use, and change in chara&or to the neighborhood. While Staff is aware that the City is in need of quality dinner houses, there Is also a need to mintain neighborhood integrity and that of the General Plan and zoning. Decisions on approval or denial of this request for zoning should not hinge on the que:ity of the cuisine but rather on good planning principles. It is quite possible that, should this request be approved, the Council could expect applications for conversions of other structures which are proposed fox or purported to be historical sites vithiv this City. Such requests are not necessarily bad, but factors other than "historical significance" should prevail in any consideration of zoning ctnngea. The applicant maintains that the estab- lishment of a restaurant for thin site would insure the continued preservation of this significant structure; however, a restaurant use does not assure that continuance of such structure. It is currently being maintained as a residence by the applicant. Over the last ten years there has been an increased interest in purchasing properties with architectural significance, especially older dwell- ings with a history richer than others. Such interest has resulted in renovations of older residential btruc�ures which enhance the lifespan of the building con- siderably for residential use. Furthermore, as a proposed historical site for the National Registry, Federal and other funding sources, as well as tax benefits could be obtained for assistance in "further preserving the site" if such desig- nation is successful. Clearly, there are other approaches to historical preservation. It should be noted that the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Antiquities Act provide greater tools to a community that wishes to help maintnin structures of historical value Any future development of that property must consider the im{.ict of removing a historical site. The applicant maintains that the site is currently under consideration for recognition on the National Registry. If no, the National Registry statue and the California Envirommntal Quality Act and any special historical preservation ordinances the City may adopt in the neat six months will do such to help in assuring the continuation of this structure. The residents perceive nuisances related to the operation of a staurant in a residential neighborhood. Nuisances such as noise, glare and conflict between the living patterns of residential uses and a restaurant that can have evening hours. This site does act have neighborhood orientation nor adequate size to provide aderuate distance between residential uses and con- residential use. In conclusion we wish to point out that the Planning Commission recommended General Plan land use for the site is low density residential. If the City Council is desirous of approving the applicant's request, the General Plan must be amended first. One recent correspondence was received in opposition (see attached), and staff has been informad that a neighborhood group wishes to piesent their view in opposition to the request at the Council meeting. Zone Change No. 103 -67 January 15, 1979 Page 3 RZCOHMMMATION: It is ret ended that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission denying a request to change the zone from A -1 -5 to C -1. i Res eetfully eub0lt[ed, _ IV" L i JACK LAH, L- rector of Co ®unity Development JL:RRfi:= Attachment: Correspondence from Mr. and Mrs. Skala Zoning Nap of Area I�v .:qd�. .�o-A�. 989 - 5431.2 CRY 0 W''ICF, �C� CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 101878 �( AM 7S8�91 IOIllItYIl 123191516 3 I O 1000' Z C 103 - 6.7 Zawt46 MnP 1J y a x w �l-1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 15, 1979 1 ' To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Jack I=. Director of Community Development Subject: ZONE CHANGE NO. 103 -67 - PARRS - An appeal of the planning Cccmis- sion decision regarding a zone change from A -1 -5 (limited agricul- ture) to C-1 (limited commercial) for properties located on the south aide of 19th StreeL approximately 1,500 feet east of Norman The applicant filed for a zone change from the City an April 10, 1978. The applicant's purpose was to Convert an existing residence, the Albert House, Into a restaurant which would also serve liquor. The site is presently toned A -1 -5; the surrounding coning in A -1 -5 and R -1. To the east and the south are existing single family homes. The applicant has submitted a detailed report for the Council's review of the zone change. He describes quite specifically the characteristics of the restaurant, the menu, the decor, market location and consideration, seating capacity, derign and layout, even the china, glans and silver tableware. The Bite In presently occupied by the Albert House, a proposed historical site, which Is cpproxiaately 73 y,ars old, the structure represents the Queen Anne style of architecture, incorporating elements of shingle atyle and colonial revival. Since the construction of the house, it has been used as a residence and still is. The proposed General Plan for the area indicates the land use as low density residential (2 -5 units per gross rcre) The development to the east and south conforms to General Plan designation. It should be noted that in the Planning Commission's deliberation on the proposed General Plan, much concern and study was given to the cormercial possibilities of 19th Street The reason for this close scrutiny we due to the various illegal commercial establishments that have cropped up on 19th Street recently. It was the Com- mission's determination that 19th Street should remain residential in character and only permit the commercial developments new under construct'•:i which were all concentrated at Intersections. At the time of the zone change hearing, the Commission denied the request. The Commission's denial was based primarily on the principle that an approval of commercial zoning would result in "spot zoning" encouraging n breakdown of the integrity of the residential existing and proposed. It In significant to note that while the Co=ml7eaion recommended dental of the zone change, they were supportive to the idea of maintaining the Albert douse me an historical structure because of its historical significance At the hearing there was a large group of adjacent property owners, all of whom voiced opposition to the proposed Comrt_rsion, because of the proic iced impact upon their neighborhood op- Zone Change No. 103- 67 January 15, 1979 Page 2 of traffic, noise, conflict in land use, and change in character to the neighborhood. While Staff is ovate that the City is in need of quality dinner houses, there is also a need to maintain neighborhood Integrity and that of the General Plan and zoning. Decisions an approval or denial of this request for coning should not hinge an the quality of the cuisine but rather on good platning principles. It is quite possible that, should this request be approved, the Council could expect applications for conversions of other structures which arc proposed for or purported ro be historical sites within this City. Such requests are not necessarily bad, but factors other than "historical significance" should prevail in any consideration of zoning clanges. The applicant maintains that the estab- lialment of a restaurant for this site would insure the continued preservation of thin aigafficant structure; however, a restaurant use does not assure that continuance of such structure. It is currently being maintained an a residenec by the applicant. Over the last ten years there has been an increased interest in purchasing propsrties with architectural significance, capemially older dwell- ings with a history richer than others. Such interest has resulted in renovations of older residential structures which enhance the lifespan of the Wilding con- siderably for residential use. Purtharmore, as a proposed historical site for the National Registry, Federal and other funding sources, as well as tax benefits could be obtained for assistance in "further pruaerving the site" if such desig- nation is successful. Clearly, there are other approaches to historical preservation. It should be noted that the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Antiquities Act provide greater tools to a community that wishes to help maintain structures of historical "Inc. Any future development of that property moat consider the impact of removing a historical site. The applicant maintains that the site is currently under consideration for recognition on the National Registry. If so, the National Registry statue and the Californin Environmental Quality Act and any special historical preservation ordinances the City may adopt In the next nix moutha will do much to help in assuring the continuation of this structure. The recidents perceive nuisances related to the operation of a restaurant in a residential neighborhood. Nuisances such as noise, glare and conflict between the living patterns of residential uses and a restaurant that can have evening hours. This site does not have neighborhood orientation nor adequate size to provide adequate distance between residential uses and con-residential use. In conclusion we wish to point out that the Planning C ®Ission recommended General Plan land use for the site is low density residential. If the City Council is desirous of approving the applicant's request, the General Plan must be amended first. One recent correspondence vas received in opposition (see attached), and staff has been informed that a neighborhood group wishes to present their views in opposition to the request at the Council meeting. lL.7 Zone Change No. 103 -67 January 15, 1979 Page 3 RECCHHENDATrON: It is recommended that the City Council uphold the declaim of the Planning Commission denying a request to change the zone from A -1 -5 to C -1. Res ectfully submitted, JACK LAM9irector of ' Community Development JL:BRR:� Attachments Correspondence iron Mr. and Mrs. Skals ' Zoning Map of Area h 0 1 -9— 79 W,f.N -t-a, -;t vti Oct 2. 6y I� 0337 % -7 CFIY OF RANCHO CUC MONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 10178 Ad 7 1911011111211N2N3Ngt5j8 0 ORDINANCE 110. 51 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CIICAHONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 201 - 261 -08 FROm R -1 TO A -P THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION. 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and place and manner described by law, reco mmends the rezoning of property hereinafter described, and the City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered that recommendation b That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed. c That thin rezoning will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration I, hereby adopted. SECTION 2: The following described property is hereby zoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly: The subject property which is generally located on the vest aide of Haven Ave. north of Lemon Ave. adjacent to the south aide of tha H W D right of way Parcel number 201- 261 -08 Is rezoned according to the following designation: From R -1 (single famfly residential) to A -P (administrative /profesaional). This ordinance shall be in full force effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 01it day after it is adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS — DAY OF . 1979. mayor r. ORDINANCE 140. 52 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZO-4INO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 208 - 011 -02 and 04. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUU14ONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing hal in the time and place and manner described - by law, recommends the rezoning of property hereinafter described, and the City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered that recommendation. b. That this rezoning Is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed. C. That this rezoning will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration is hereby adopted SECTION 2: The following described property is hereby zoned In the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly: The subject property which is generally located on the southwest corner of Baseline Rd. and Nollman Ave, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 208 - 011 -02 and 04 is rezoned according to the following designation: From r.-1 (single family residential) to A -P (administrative /professional). This ordinance ahall be in full force effective at 11:01 a.m. on the 31st day after it is ndopted. PASSED, APPROVED A'RI ADOPTED THIS _ DAY OF , 1979. Full • e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDMI Date: January 15, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Jack lam, Director of Community Development Subject: ZONE CHAPGE NO. 103 -67 - PARRS - An appeal of the Planning Commis- sion decision regarding a zone change from A -1 -5 (limitev agricul- ture) to C-1 (limited commercial) for properties located on the south side of 19th Street approximately 1,500 feet east of Hermosa The applicant filed for a zone change from the City on April 10, 1978. The applicant's purpose was to convert an existing residence, the Albert House, Into a restaurant which would also serve liquor. The site is presently zoned A -1 -5; the surrounding zoning is A -1 -5 and R -1 To the east and the south are existing single family homes. The applicant has submitted a detailed report for the Council's review of the zone change. fie describes quite specifically the characteristics of the restaurant, the menu, the decor, market location and consideration, seating capacity, desigu and layout, even the china, glass and silver tablevare. The site is presently occupied by the Albert Souse, a proposed historical site, which is approximately 73 years old, the otruct„re represents the Queen Anne style of architecture, Incorporating elements :i shingle style and colonial revival. Since the construction of the house, It has been used as a iesidence and still 1a The proposed General Plan for the area Indicates the land use as low density residential (2 -5 units per gross acre). The development to the east and south conforms to General Plan designation. It should be noted that In the Planning Commission's deliberation on the proposed General Plrn, much concern and study was given to the commercial possibilities of 19th Street. The reason for this close scrutiny was due to the various illegal commercial establishments that have cropped up on 19th Street recently. It was the Com- mission's determination that 19th Street should remain residential In character and only permit the commercial developments new under construction which were all concentrated at intersections. At the time of the zone change hearing, the Commission dented the request. The Comiseion's denial was based primarily on the principle that an approval of come•cial zoning would result In "spot zoning" encouraging a breakdown of the integrltl of the residential existing and proposed. It Is significant to note that while the Commission recommended dental of the zone change, they were supportive to the Idea of maintaining the Albert House as an historical structure because of Its historical significance. At the hearing there wau a large group of adjacent property owners, all of whom voiced opposition to the proposed conversion, because of the projected impact upon their neighborhood Zone Change No. 103- 67 January 15, 1979 Page 2 of traffic, noise, conflict in land use, and change in character to the neighborhood. While Staff is aware that the City is in need of quality dinner houses, there Is also a need to maintain neighborhood integrity and that of the General Plan and zoning. Decisions on approval or denial of this request for zoning should not hinge on the quality of the cuisine but rather on good planning princlplas. It is quite possible that, should this request be approved, the Council could expect applications for conversions of other structures which are proposed for or purported to be historical sites within this City. Such requests are act necesoarlly bad, but factors other than "historical significance" should prevail In auy consideration of zoning changes. The applicant maintains that the estab- lishment of a restaurant for title site would insure the continued preservation of this significant structure; however, a restaurant use does not assure that continuance of such structure. ft 1s currently being maintained as a residence by the applicant. Over the last ten years there has been an increased interest in purchasing propertlen with architectural significance, especially older dwell- ings with a history rILher than others. Such Interest has resulted in renovations of older residential structures which enhance the lifespzn of the Wilding con - aiderably for residential use. Furthermore, as a proposed historical site for the National Registry, Federal and other funding sources, as well as tax benefits could be obtained for assistance in "further preserving the site" if such desig- nation to successful. Clearly, there are other approaches to historical preservation. It should be noted that the California Environmental Quality Act and the National Antlqultles Act provide greater tools to a community that wishes to help maintain structures of historical value. Any future development of that property must consider the Impact of removing a historical site. The applicant maintains that the site is currently under consideration for recognition on the National Registry. If so, the National Registry status and the California Environmental Quality Act and any special historical preservation ordinances the City may adopt in the neat six months will do such to help in assuring the continuative of this structure. The residents perceive nulsances related to the operation of a restaurant in a residential neighborhood. Nuisances such as noise, glare and conflict between the living patterns of residential uses and a restaurant that can have evening hours. This site does not have neighborhood orientation nor adequate size to provide adequate distance between residential uses and ton- residential use. In conclusion we wish to point out that the Planning Co®iesion recommended General Plan land use for the site is law density residential If the City Council In desirous of approving the applicant's req,,est, the General Plan must be amended first. One recant correspondence we received In opposition (nee attached), and staff has been Informed that a neighborhood group wishes to present their views in opposition to the request at the Council meeting. �.4 0" z*'.: rv�$.'� _Shy$.:'y'': rya' 1�� , >.G- ?,aiP'•ts.�.;.:; ^i�v:., .. ,.. ,. •_ - ... _" "'t' .• ;r 3YJ "Y• � Zone Change No. 103 -67 January 15, 1979 Page 3 RECWTOATION: It is recommended that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission denying a request to change the zone from A -1 -5 to C -1. Res ectfully subtitted, JACK LAMdr.- r Pf{.. Community Development JL:BKH:im Attachment. Cormespuneence from Hr. and Mrs. Skala Zoning Hap of Area n.: w'a;_ sib- 'l.'f -r?51r r2»!.'x.,?r. ,F_a__ : -..- w: n...= �_ S• . 7 - -7. 7; - I yw(a•A -e- 9 � q- S43 / CITY OF RANCHO CA ONGA ADMINISTRATION r JAN 10 1918 - An pm 7�8�9il01UIYlIl12i3�915 S_• o j loco i ZG 103 - 67 IT. zon�e+G MAP W 4 ZI w a x h 1 ■, M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager Lloyd Rubbs, City Engineer Jack Lam, Director of Community Development PROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: January 11, 1979 RE: Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 30 Pertaining to Financing of Interim School Facilities. Enclosed is the proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 30. The purpose of the Ordinance is to make it clear that in those i cases where the building permit is issued by an agency other than the City, that the fees are nevertheless paid directly to i the City.' ;a RED:sgg Enclosure W ��Y S'y: vy A.:..'sY��a /,,. :: :t,,' ' -� '7:•'�' ;'�ic..i ,1'�, yw l��I. ORDINANCE NO. 56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 30 PERTAINING TO FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 30 of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, Calrfo`rn a, is hereby amended by adding Section 8(c) to read as follows: •(c) when a building permit is issued by an enforcing agency other than the City, the fees required by this Ordinance shall be paid directly to the City Building Department and not to the enforcing agency.'. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinanc and the City Cler a all attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of gen- eral circulation, publieheU7n t e City of Ontaric, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979. AP3ROVED and ADOPTED -this day of ATTEST: 4 AYES% NOESt ABSENT: City C ar Mayor of .e city of Rancho Cucamonga 5. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Jack Lam, Director of Community Development FROM; Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: January 11, 1979 RE: Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 8 Which Pertains to a Park and Recreation Tax for New Residential Develop- ment. Enclosed please find the proposed Ordinance Amending - Ordinance No. 8. It was called to our attention that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not the caforcing agency for the purpose of iasuing building permits for mobile home spaces in mobile home parks (sea Health and Safety Code Section 18300, of se g., and Section 18500, at seg.). This amendment is therefore nec- ossary to insure that the City can collect its park and recaea- tion tax with respect to mobile home park developments. RCD:sgg Enclosure r e N - b . •�,.�t .� r, J17r" . 4r�w�r�+ny+" {.. r•.••.1. ,•rte ?:v4•u�, :."�"�_---�.. �: - ORDINANCE No. 57 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 110. R WHICH PERTAINS TO A PARR AND RECREATION TAX FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DE- VELOPMENT. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal! - fornia, does ordain as follows: S1'CTION 1: Section 5 of Ordinance No. 8 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to reed es fol- lows: "SECTION S. Tax: When Payable. The tax imposed by this Ordi- nance shall be due and psyr.ble upon issuance of a building permit and shall be refunded cnly in the event that the building permit is- sued has expired and no construc- tion has been commenced. In the event the building pornit is is- sued by an enforcing agency other than the City, the axount of the tax shall be paid directly to the City Building Department and not to the enforcing agency. ". SECTION 2: The mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cierhall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Da Report, a newspaper of gen- eral circulation, publishe�in t o City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979 APFROVED and ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Cler Mayor.a C ty o Rancho Cucamonga 3,1l: }1 ^'�V`C;•..- -t "x��j!*•N *bt::; •ri'vLL'� MsV .I.f��y}Wj.jn...irt�"P!Vl..�u�f 44�Ir..l' rMNt • � • r r -•a F'_i� �. N,e t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: January 15, 1979 To: City Manager ani City Council From: Jack Lam, Director of Coccunity Development Subject: DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CERTAIN kORTIONS OF THE CODE The City Council authorized the hiring of a Community Code Representativo an part of the hiring package approved for the Community Development Department last summer. This individual will start work on January 15, 1979. This Com- munity Code Representative's primary responsibilities are to loll with code enforcement activities including a vide range of citizen complaints, viola- tions brought to the attention of the City by City officials, City Staff and all others This person will estublish a code compliance program thet would replace that which the County had prior to the City's Incorporation. Witi, this individual aboard, code violations may be investigated and citizen complaints handled more expeditiously and with greater local control At the present time code enforcement is lift or miss whenever we can find time for St. It should be noted that the Community Code Representative is not a police officer. Ilia job Is not to spy on residents or businesses, nor is his job to find every violation possible. We view the Community Code Representatives function as me requiring a great deal of public relations effort to obtain voluntary compliance with city codes in the least objectionable way and to satisfy complainants that goverment Is Interested in their concerns. To complete the cede enforcement package for Rancho Cucamonga there Is a need to designate certain city employees to enforce the city code. The attached ordinance and resolution in effect desig- nates the Community Code Representative and certain other city employees as having the power to Issue a citation in cases where all reasonable means of cooperation and communications In obtaining code compliance fails (for Instance in the case of the green house violation). This puts teeth into code enforcement. Without this tool, code enforcement is more difficult and leas effective The practice of issuing citations in consistent with mile enforcement programs of other cecaunt- ties. It has been found to be very effective since the knowledge that a citation may be issued 1s a great motivating factor in obtaining code compliance particularly In cases where compliance can not be obtained in any other manner. The attached ordinance is the eiabling legislation to allow the Council to desig- nate certain employees to enforce the City code and the Resolution specifically designates key individuals to the same Please note that the peraon having pri- mary responsibility for code enforcement would be the Community Code Represents - five; however, three other names are designated as backups especially since these individuals are periodically involved in code enforcement. -,I •_ V•��1{AT �o1Y M� �•hiM•.t:W ,�.�.Owrl �.�.�.�l �L.oOOR'Y:OLL�• l � . r M Page 2 RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Coureil adapt the attached Resolution and Ordinance. Reap ctfully submitted, ��a JACK LAN, Director cf Community Development 1 JL:nm Attachments: Ordinance Resolution f. OF. vii: `t!1,`..'r, i•7�.:llG.w�.1:' "yYr+.� tom. •'• «.•S .r It .=1, I-j- /:.;•`. WM ORDINANCE NO. ',4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, REGARDING THE POWER OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDINANCES AND ALL PRI- MARY AND SECONDARY CODFS REFERRED TO THEREIN. The Cit. Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: All officer w' employee of the City designated by City Cn- Resolution is empowered to, and has the duty to, enforce any provision of any Ordinance of the City, and all pri- mary and secondary Codes reierrad to therein, the violation of which provision or provisions constitute an ..ifraction or mird-.- meaner. Said employee shall be deemed a public officer or exployea empowered by virtue of this Code and Secticn 036.5 of the California Penal Code to give :itations for such violations whenever such offi- cer or employee has reasonable cause to believe that the person cited has committed su,:l, misdemeanor or infrlxtion in his presence which is a violation of tho Ordinance, prima-y Code or secondary Code which such officer of employee ha3 the duty to enforce. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s -all attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published withzn fifLecn (15) days after its passage, at least once in 'he Da11Y- ReRort, a newspaper of general circula- tion, published the City or Ontario, Califcrnta, and circulated in the City of k .ho Cucamonga, California. _ 1979. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , ATTEST: AYES: NOES• ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga v,:.. 1� I . Jfw- cj',rr1, 11 S?CNY��1 %.� I i.h�1/Y!y� -+'elf /.v�tq` T.. uT, 1�:..' J, �[ir:"w.•t�w±.y�C�/lM,d�Tij'.:. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNLI DESIGNATING CERTAIN CITY EHPLO11EES TO ENFORCC CITY OPDINANCTS AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO THEREIN SECTION 1. Pursuant to Ordinaure No. 54 the following city employees are designated to enforce city o,dir aaeea in ail primary and eecondery codes referred to therein: Carr Richard*, Community Code Representative Jerry Grant, Building Official Barry Hogan, Senior Planner Michael Vairin, Associate Planner APPROVED AIM ADOPiID THIS DAY OF , 1979. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor NOW," . kA ORDINANCE NO. 55 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that there has een nadequate time for the Planning Commission to complete studies concerning appropriate regulations for adult businesses, and that the term of Ordinance No. 45 should be ex- tended. SECTION 2: Section 5 of Ordinance No. 45 of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read as follows: 'SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall Tema n n effect until August 1, 1979, and during such period, all ordinances inconsistent with the Provisions hereof shall be sus- pended and superseded by this Ordi- nance.". SECTION 3: The City Council does hereby find and declare that th sI orJRanco is for the immediate preservation of the pub- - lic peace, health and safety, and it shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cler e a attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) dais after its passage, at least once in The Daily �R_o�ort�, a newspaper of general circulation, Published in tVc City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk- Mayor of the city of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 15, 1979 0 To: City Manager and Members of the City Council Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: PLANNING Ca..SSSION RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAEI AS REQUESTED Of THE CITY COUNCIL As the Council will recall, there were several Issues raised at the fer eral Plan public hearing which the Planning Commisefon had not discussed during their review of the General Plan. Therefore, the City Council referred these Items to the Planning Commiealon'for their reco ®endation. The Planning Commission, at Its meeting of January 10, 1979, reviewed these issues and have finalized recommendations for the Council. A copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report, which fully describes each issue and the factors involved, a location map and an area nip for Area 01, is attached for your review. Following is a description of the Co ®izsion'u discussion and recomendations for each area in question. Area I1: North side of Foothill Blvd. between Turner and Center Avenue (Exhibit "A ") Gederal Plan Designation: Senesce commercial on the uorthweat corner, mixed use for the remaining frontage along Foothill Blvd and low density residential for the rear portion of the arm. Issue: Owners desire service commercial across the Foothill frontage betuttl Turner and Center and high density residential to the rear Commission Dlacussion: The Comission was concerned that the extension of ser- vice commercial to Center Avenue may create piecemeal commercial develop- ment that could result in another Holt Blvd. The Commission felt that the service commercial designation could be logically extended to Centet Avenue if design considerations such as joint parking, shared access, coordinated designs, and redesigns of existing businesses were done. All property owners within this area were present and all agreed to develop thin area In a coordinated effort in order to provide high quality developments. Commission Recomendatlon: The Commission wted 4 -1 to recommend that the Couneil extend the service commercial designation to Center Avenue at a depth of 100' and that the remaining 300' to the rear be changed to mixed use. 0 . i Page 2 Area 02, Past side of Maven between Highland and Leman General Plan Designation: Mixed use and low density residential 1 Issue: Owner desires extension of mixed use to Lemon Avenue P; Commission Discussion: The COMMIasion unanimously agreed that at least one tair of residential lots on the south aide of Lemon Avenue was needed in order to insure separation of residential and mixed use traffic. Without having Oita specific plans, the Commiaslwn could not insure that adequate buffering could occur if mixed use was alluved to extend all the way to Lemon Avenue. 'i Coamlasion Reccmme dation: The Commisuion unanimously recoareads that the Coun- cil retain the present General Plan den!gmtion (low deasfty redden- $ tial). Area 03: South side of Foothill Blvd. between Rochester Avenue and Day Creek_ _ General Plan Designation: Minimum impact industrial IasLe: Ovnor desires commercial designation Cocmisslon Discussion: The owner requested the service commercial extension to enable him to develop an auto service estaolishment. Inasmuch as the industrial committee is studying the feasibility of allowing uses suc as auto aervlco establishments in the minimum impact industrial area. the Commission felt there vac no justification to extend the service commercial area at this time. Commission Recommendation: The Planning Coaa,tae.ao unanimously recommended that the Council retain the present General Plan designation (mint muc impact Industrial). Area 06: North side of Baseline, vest of Arcblbald, adjacent to the existing Alpha Beta Shopping Center General Plan Dcalgnatim: Mixed Use Issue: Owners desire neighborhood commercial designation Commission Discussion: The Commission discussed at length the possibility of an additional shopping center In this area. The amjorlty consensus of the Commission was that an additional retail center at thin location would cause significant traffic problems beyond that which presently exists. The Commission felt that uses within the nixed use category would have less Impact but yet allow flexibility of land uses and still retain the general administrative professional character for this area of Baseline. Page 3 Commission Recomendatlon: The Planning Comm:lssion voted 4.0 -1 to recomend that the Council retain the present Generab Plan designation (mixed use). Reapectf� ul]/p ubmlt ted, JACK LAM, Director of " —� Comua:nity Development JL:MV:nm lttachaencs Location Map Area fl Location Map Planning Commission Staff Report - January 10, 1979 Resolution Certity'ag the Environmental Impact Report an the Interim Land Use, Circulation b Public Facilities Element of the General Plan Resolution Certifying the Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan and Innterm Development Review Policies for the City of Rancho Cucamonga �1 K C AREA MAF j, I 1 J. f � 11 1 I See Alternatives Below �� �� � O]IIO N]o SOmiq• •� ++,raw r.'.RF41j] •7 .. 4-t 'T:Gbf1<gJ :� j, I 1 J. f � 11 1 I See Alternatives Below Lr i•� ^'.0 'Y. �� �� � O]IIO N]o SOmiq• •� •7 .. 4-t Lr i•� ^'.0 'Y. W3. 82IN33 i'T1T7�R :RTC' ^!'ITT•TT�; t � N v - i cl LU �. � J • V � ' OM • i t't, -•- - 3rW3A0 87ll t •- .- z�t ® � ;ryl al �tl�Y r 1 G3: .0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NCA ST4 F REPORT Date: January 10, 1979 To: Planning Commission From: Jack Lan, Director of Community Development Subject: CCUNCIL REFERRALS OF GENERAL PLAN ISSUES BACKGROUND: The City Council, at its meeting of January 3, 1979, held its first public hearing on the propased interim elements of the General Plan. Many major land use issues were reviewed l+ the City Council and the majority of their decisions were to uphold tha Planning Commission recormendations. The Commission is to be congratulated for their deci- sions and recommendations on the Central Plan. The Council, however, has referred several issues to the Planning Commission for their guidance and recommendation prior to their final decision. We are happy to aay•that these Issues are ones that the Commission did not previously review. ANALYSIS: 1. Area: North side of Foothill Blvd. between Turner and Center Avenue General Plan Designation: Service commercial on the northwest corner, mixed use for the remaining frontage along Foothill Blvd. and low density resideutial for the rear portion of the area c Issue: Owners desire service commercial across the Foothill frontage between Tumor and Center and high density residential to the rear. Factors: The existing service commercial designation encompasses a convenient market, motel /apartment, and a restaurant. The mixed use area encompasses several single dwellings, one tire business, and much vacant lend. The tire business is contained within one small building that could be easily converted to accomuodate other uses as the building appears not to contain any hydraulic car lifts. The Commission has dis- cussed the Issue of ccmmercial along Foothill Blvd, and has favored res- tricting the Foothill corridor from becoming one long commercial strip. The Comfssions' intent thus far has been to incorporate other land uses along Foothill to create a dynamic balance of lend uses. Extending the service commtccial designation to Center Avenue would be in conflict with She Commissions' past decisions. In addition, there are not significant existing commercial uses that would warrant this commercial extension. As the parcels in this area are 600' in depth and because of individual par - celfzation, Staff recomends that the rear portion of this area be desig- nated as mired use. Under one designation, development can occur in amore logical manner. ITEM "R" 64 COUNCIL REFERRALS Or GENERAL PLAN ISSUES January 10, 1979 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Retain designation along Foothill Blvd, frontage and change the rnar portion to mixed use. 2. Area: East side of Haven between Highland and Lemon Ceneral Pl.n Designation: Mined use and low density residential Issue: Owner desires extension of mixed use to Lemon Avenue Factors: Thw land is presently vacant. there 1s an existing single family subdlv'sion on the northeast corner of Lemon and Haven. Lemon Avenue will 11: ely c -atine easterly to provide access to this resi- dential area. I: nixed use is allowed to front along Lenin, than there will be problems with land use Incompatibilities and circulation patterns. By retaining the residential strip along the south aide of Lemon, it wou : segregate mixed use traffic with residential traffic as Lemon would be used exclusively for access to these residential areas. The freeway frontage road, which is shown on the plan, is not definite and could be aligned to service the entire mixed use area without channeling mixed use traffic through residential arms. In addition, there are too manv unknown factors In terns of specific site considerations, the free- way, and the frontage road. Retain General Plan designation. 3. Area: South aide of Foothill Blvd between Rochester Avenue and Day Crack General Plan Designation: Minimum Impact Industrial Issue: Owner desires commercial designation Factors: The owner is concerned that his existing winery would not be allowed to expand or be improved. The General Plan text, under historic preservation, Indicates that the majority of the winery's have special historical significance and that they will have to be studied as possibly allowing provisions for restaurants and retail vine shops. Staff there- fore sees no reason to alter the existing designation. RECC MFNDATION: Retain General Plan designation. 4. Area: North side of Baseline, vent of ArchibUd, adjacent to the existing Alpha Beta Shopping Center General Plan Designation: Mixed Use Issue: Owners desire neighborhood commercial deaigngtlon 6P� N • .• COUNCIL REFERRALS OF GENERAL PLAN ISSUES January 10, 1979 Page 3 of 3 Factors: When the Alpha Beta center was developed, recipricol access and parking agreements were recorded with these parcels. As the Comis- sim is aware, the Alpha Beta center in deficient In parking by approxi- mately 80 parking stalls If the adjacent property is permitted to be developed as an additional shopping center, a significant amount of that parking will most likely be used by tenants and customers of the existing center. This could possibly create a deficiency of any new retail center. In addition to a potential Increase in the parking problem, an additional retail center at this location will significantly effect the already over- crowded and poor traffic circulation at the intersection of Archibald and Baselfuc. With the construction and completion of the Albertson /Angels cen- ter, any additional retail centers near this intersection, beyond that which is planned, will significantly impact the capacity of the surrounding streets. RECCIOMMATICh' Retain General Plan designation. Rmp [Fully submitted, JACK iLAM, Director of Community Development JL:NV:nm � r RESOLUTION N0. 79-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Oi THE INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES !7,EHEtlr OF THE GENERAL PLAN FUR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, John Blayney and Associates prepared a Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element red corresponding Environmental Impact Report of the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held duly advertised public hearings pursuant to Section 15085 of the California Administrative Code WHEREAS, the City Council has considerel the Planning Commission recom- mendations public testimony and cocmen:s and has incorporated such comments Into the EIR WHEREAS, the Environmental Impact Report was prepared as an informs - tional document to the interim Land Uae, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. SIfTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has "do the following f LUdings: 1 That the Environmental Impact Report was completed In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the State EIR guidelines. 2 That the elements of the General Plan are recommended to be adopted on an interim basis only so that specific aspects can be studied in more detail during the prepara- tion of the remaining General Plan elements. 1. That specific time limits have been established for detailed studies and preparation of the remaining mandated General Plan Elements. 4 That the interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facili- ties Elements have incorporated policies such at- special studies zones for environmental hazardous areas, the erea- tion and implementation of a grading and zoning ordinance, lover residential densities in environmentally sensitive areas, and participation with regional agencies for imple- mentation of regional air pollution problems. 5. That this project reduces the amount of impacts as result of development, in comparison to the current County General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1 That pursuant to Section 15085 to 15088 of the California Administrative Code, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the Environmental I.tpact Report on the Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan on the 3rd day of January, 1979. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1979. ATTEST: City Clark 6 • .• RESOLUTION NO. 79 -5 A RESOLUTION OF THE Rt_,CLHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING THE INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES F1.E24ENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND INTERIM DEVELOPY.LHT REVIEW POLICIES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUU_SONGA WHEREAS, it is the goal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to prepare an adopt a long range comprehensive general plan setting forth the manner in :hick the land within the City may be developed so " to provide the best possible living situation for all concerned and to achieve a social, economic and environ- mental balance within the city; 13HEREAS, Government Code Section 65302.5b equirea that newly incorporated communities develop all mandatory elements of the general plan within 30 months after the date of incorporatio.:; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga at the time of Incorporation had fiscal resources to only do a portion of the work neceescry for development of a complete master plan; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of the complete general plan; petitioners have or will attempt to subdivide and develop land in a manner that would be lnconsin_ent with and would frustrate the general plan by circumvenLing the intent of the plan by requesting subdivision and project approval during the Plans formulation stage; and WHEREAS, it 1s the objective of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to protect the general plan from lndescriminatp lot splitting and development duri its. incubation period but not prohibit all lot splitting or development pending adoption of the complete general plan; and WHEREAS, It is the objectives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to adopt measures to prevent this type of indiscriminate lot splitting and /or development; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamongn immediately needs a basic frame- work for planning within the community; and WNERPAS, John Blayney and Associates has prepared interim land Use. Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered revisions to the interim elements by the Planning Cotalssfen, the public and ocher interested parties; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Draft Environ- mental Impact Report on the Interim land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements and all testimony and comments pettaining to It and finds the Draft Environ- mental Impact Report to be adequate and has certified the Draft Environmental Impact Report. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has made the following findings: •1. That the interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements Includes Interim statements of development policies including nape and text setting forth objectives, principles, standards and plan proposals. I 2 That the Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan designates proposed general distri- bution, general location ana nxcent of the uses of the land. 3. That the interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan designates the general location and extent of existing and proposed major thoroughfares, trans- portation routes and local public facilities. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Sections 65351 and 65352 of the California Govern- ment Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Elements of the General Plan for Rancho Cucamonga on the 3rd day of January, 1979. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cuc =onga City Council will review these interim elements after preparation of the other mandatory elements for possible modification to reflect consistency in element policies. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that it shall be the policy of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to: 1. Anticipate and accomzodate population growth In ways that are not damaging to the social, economic and envlronaental systems In the community by lasuring compatibility with the existing and projected surrounding land use, preserving the identities of present coam,ni- ties; discouraging leapfrog development to reduce the cost of pro- viding urban level services within these communities; and protectlrg areas sensitive to development from urbanization. 2. To Improve the quality of life for the community by developing an ongoing cpen space program to provide visual relief from urban densities. 3 To encourage preservation of significant archeological and histori- cal sites representing all the ethnic, cultural and economic groups that have lived in Rancho Cucamonga. 6. To Insure that its biological diversity be preserved for their scenic and education value by ensuring that all proposed develop- ments will be adequately reviewed with regard to possible adverse or beneficial effects on plant and animal life. 5 To safeguard and maintain areas of outstanding geologic foaturea for their scenic, historical and cultural value. 6. To avoid land uses which threaten public safety and property value by: a Assuring that population densities and development are kept ti a minimum in areas of geologic hazards such as active fault zones and landslide areas. b. Requiring geologic reports where conditions warrant them iden- tifying unstable elopes and seismic hazards relating to building sites prior to the approval of development projects; and c. Considering the limiting effects of geologic hazards on potential land uses and zoned dwelling unit densities; and • . • d. Requiring new residential dgvolopments be designed to minl- nlze valume and velocity of surface runoff and sail steel= Including the application of revegetation programs, the proper design of surface and subsurface drainage and appropriate grading; and e. Consultation with the Foothill Fire District in critical fire areas for particular regulations prior to subdivision or project approval. 7. To encourage quality of design of all land uses within the City [trough a rigorous design critique of project design; and 8. To preserve ..sldentlal neighborhoods by protecting residential areas from incompatibla land uses and discouraging the conversion of existing residential uses to non - residential uses APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 1979 ATTEST: City Clerk s •v6•�•`•a ;.l•: .'1 �r }yra l_ -♦ .;�; sY. •..w`�c�l a!'!'1 `. .._ M E M 0 R A N D U 11 DATE: January 12, 1979 TO: City 1lanager and Member of the City Council FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant to the City Manage SUBJECT: Meetings with Alta Lagunn /Alta Vista Mobile Home Park Owners. As you are aware, Councilmen Schlosser and West met Januan• 4 with Allan Wilk, part owner of Alta Laguna 1lobilehome Park. At this meeting staff presented to Mr Wilk and his associates, a brief overview of the concerns expressed by Alta Laguna tenants and the petition for establishment of a Mobilehone Rent Review Comnission. I1r Wilk responded with a description of his substantial investment in the park and necessary street, landscape, and tree removal improvements that he has made in the park since its purchase in 1976. Mr Wilk contends he will not recover his initial Investment for several years it would have been necessary to increase rents $60 S70 (rather than the $25 December increase) to recover these investments according to Mr. Hilk Mr. Wilk said future rent increases would not exceed the 8 - 10% level each year and offered to enter into a lease with Alta Laguna tenants Mr. Wilk has entered into such a lease with tenants of the Camarillo Mobilehome Park in Ventura C.unty. Mr Wilk also agreed to have a letter drafted by his manager that he would be willing to sit down with a tenants representative Lo discuss the concerns of Alta Laguna tenants To date Mr Pate (Alta Laguna tenants representative) has been contacted by Mr. Wilk's manager and a meeting will take place within the week On January 9, 1979, Councilmen West, Schlosser, and Palombo met with William Semain and Phillip Semain, miners of the Alta Vista Mobilehome Park The owners of the Alta Vista park stated that they had operated the park at a loss for 1978 and needed the scheuuled January increase to continue the day -to -day operation of the park. William Semain also said that the scheduled January rent increase had been deferred un'il February so that necessary repairs and improvements can be made to the park The owners are pursuing eviction of residents who are involved in vandalism, harassment and violations of park rules 11r. Semain reported that he had met with GSMOL members (tenants group) and discussed a number of issues including rent increases, park improvements, and the formulation of park rules and regulations. From the attached minutes of this meeting it appears that the meeting adar -ssed all of the concerns of the Alta Vista tenants After these intial meetings with Alta Laguna and Alta Vista owners, it appears that discussions between owners and tenants are progressing satisfactorily Staff will be setting up meetings with the remaining owners of the six parks in Rancho Cucamonga this week 71-- L :Yrp<�'v...Y:N.. ��1),�,�.1 •-r'�.. ": �'.r.,�r,��..ni}dj�',:.�..+�:.. a�+.S "�. �!+: C: •.i ..,',Y::�)'J.�,1 r- +w'.Y�.rar�h ter` �•� �pu�.� ' � —' �.�'�� .1.wT.,^`wwYirrwJ{r �n+.� %1"�'�A t.i l.J`.ur� .+..�.. n.. � � � .• 'r ql-" 9k" 9 -h vnHe 3� Cnvwnir A6 t4a1. 10350 BASELINE ROAD ALTA LOMA. CALIFORNIA 91701 (714) 987.5622 December 29, 1978 Memorordum To; All Park Residents Prom; William and philip Semaln Dear Residents; Our attempts to accomplish by January let, 1978 the many items of maintenance and park rehabilitation have not been entirely realized. Our managers, Marc and Trivia Hart have worked long hours in spite me" of their efforts bo.ing undone by irresponsible young people. We have engaged an aosistant manager to help accelerate the • clean up " effort. We think a great deal has been done in the last three weeks. In short we feel that the month of January will be necessary to effect tho additional evictions of problem people to bring the park facilities to decent standards and to correct the park anvlronment to the point where we can honestly feel the increased rental is perfectly justified. Therefore, the rent increase we announced to become effective on January 1, 1979 we are deferring until February 1, 1979 by which time we will have come along much further, wa hope, in bringing Alta Vista to a condition ensuring safe pleasant and comfortable living for every resident. Yours Sincerely; William Semain C� a December 27, 1978 MEMORANDUM TO GSMOL MEMBERS ALL PARK RESIDENTS FROM: BILL WILHELM, PRESIDENT k� ;g .3 As we stated in the October and November GSMOL Meetings, our plan was to collectively formulate a set of Rules 8 Regulations and use these as a basis for establishing a meaningful dialogue with the owners To this end, we have accomplished that goal in a meeting between William Semain (owner), Clarence Scholl, Bob Davis, Paul Axelrod, Steve Barden and myself A number of park issues were discussed which principally dealt with vandalism, park beautification, trash and other services, rules, regulations and their enforcer,ent, and the intended rent increase. - It is with great pleasure that we can favorably apprise you of the outcome of today's meeting, to wit: t� Our proposed Rules 6 Regulations with three minor amendments were well re- ceived and will be adopted by the owners and enforced r 2 The owners (William Semain) have taken and will continue positive steps to- ward overall clean -up of grounds and facilities 3. Special attention will be directed toward improving the overloaded trash condition 4. The owners have every intention of pursuing eviction of residents who are involved in vandalism, harassment and other serious violations of park rules and /or local laws /statutes 5 The proposed Januar 1979 rent increase will be deferred until February, 1979. This represents a ; ,u,10 "out -of- pocket" show of good faith on the part of the owners and will g,,e them an additional month to correct poor conditions. 6. Suitable trespassing, fire lane and other signs that may be required will be properly posted. 7 As the vandalism decreases, park entrance lighting and aPJ4tlonal park beau- '' tification will be accomplished i r, 73 ;�� -F 1 _VP r�.e�5 �•.w�t .QI` p `I .fit �� p _ r« — ,. �Y� . I a�. 4fr •.' ^3l, 4'+{6/%�.k'f r C� �„tr� �f :".1.c".:..�f� ^.y�1yM1 "1 W./ 1�n./.'^ �. �^ ^'✓.- iifwhi:. 'i 1.: .. f�.�'�J-T2/ s`L. y7 ♦ dYl.�' i1. ' � -4w ...0 I - rw • t December 27, 1978 GSMOL Members /All Park Residents Page 2 A significant number of park rumors and out-of-context quotes were aired and dis- posed of to the satisfaction of all in attendance Principally, among this category of f.tems was the misunderstanding regarding the withholding of rent by the residents It was made clear to Mr. Semainthat our (GS110L Chapter) position was to inform the residents of but one alternative open to them with respect to rent increase rebuttal but was not an official Chapter recooinendatio^. The Chapter's recommendation is to pay the increase and protest by letter if we felt the owners are not making a rea- sonable attempt to improve park conditions Considering the positive outcome of to- day's meeting, we now feel that such a protest letter would be illadvised and un- timely Yours truly, W C "Bill" Wilhelm Chapter President P S. Enclosure of bylaNS - -- Don't forget our °social° meeting Tuesday, January 9th. HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL 1. PROGRAM ELLHENT DESCRIPTION: Program Element Name Co=.,unit_�venlle Crime pg,entloo Unit Program Category Number 3 -4 Submitting Agency Rancho Cucam ' - ergo Sheri tf a Sta tin Total Number of Elements Prog. Element Contact Persun Thomas Wickum Number of This Element Captain Submitting County San Bennandino Address __9333 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Amount Requested $__65 466-W Telephone Number 714 989 -6611 (Area Coda) (Number 2. SITE LDCATIONS: Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Statfon, 9333 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California 3. NEED STATMENT: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a newl7 incorporated city of one year. The Sheri s Department contracts law enforcement in this city and has the total respell bility of both criminal and traffic Jn this area. Our statistics, as well as those com- piled by the State of California Indicate a rise of approximately 15.202 in crimes again property In our city. Statistics derived by the State and Federal Governmept indicate that approximately 53% of all burglaries are committed by t a juvenile offender Contri buLlug to this Increase in rise crime rate IV a la.ge delinquency problem combined with volatile gang activity in our barrio area. We have exacrienced a considerable rise in t burglary rate as well as violent crimes committed by Juvenile offenders. 4. OVERVIEW: Frtabllsh a Community Juvenile Crime Prevention Program to deal with the Juvenile offender. This program will deal with burglary prevention through residential and commerciol security checks, Neighborhood Watch Programs, Block Parent Programs. Further, to establish self -help programs and presenting educational programs for schools and parents dealing with narcotics and Juvenile delinquency. This can be accomplished with a dctcctive •o coordinate these rrograms and be responsible for I •Rr!a, ton of Juvenile crimes and the coordination of these Investigations with Proration and the Cuur: for a better understanding and more affective program for the Juveni a offender. Further a Limited Duty Deputy woul d coordinate watch programs and others and distribute brochures and other educational media devices. Statistics from the Fontana Substation Indicate that these programs have reduced their burglary rate by 15 '.. Fontana Police Department Indicates a reduction in their burglary rate by 232. These programs would S. INTENDED RESULTS: This approach to the Juvenile crime problem in FY 79/80 will accompli: The following results: (1) Will reduce the crime rate Involving Juvenile offenders. (2) Will establish better Police /Lcmunity relations as wall as better coordination between all departments In the Juvenile Justice System. The performance indicators to 6. EVALUATION TiE•iIiODOLO1Y. The Community Juvenile Crime :prevention Unit will report directly to Rancho Cucamonga Sheclff's Station Commander, 9333 Ninth Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, telephones: 989 -6611. Ifni unit detective will collect statistical data each month Including all crime Indexes within the City of Rancho Cucamonga The data gathered will be used to compile crime trend and program impact 7. HATCHING FUNDS: Not applicable i� Y r�x r 4. OVERVIEW (Continued): hn:e a definite Impact or. the 53% juvenile offender rate in burglaries committed and in the violent crime rate 5. INTENDED RESULTS (Continued): be used will be the Department of Justice Profile for the funding year, as well as statistical doia from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 6. EVALUATION HETNODOLOOY (Continued): analysis. :'rogram monitoring will enable program flexibility and madmum efficiency. Evaluation reports will be prepared on a quarterly basfu and submitted to the County Justice System Advisory group. 9 ? �• �, %... ;a.rryA1>��.12s:"1•'.,�.�i� �,'. N. r.s' n aa`,:; �t:"!•." ��: � . •r � .�• �f'y,. J..1'f �•Y.�'ln'`��• -1 a;..•ny- Yt- �i.�.M1•f'Vw.Y ._ _ :'.'Y'ti• r- `_.:. ,., � �w u.•.I -it .,. �.. 9ta 6 B 8• PROGRAM ELEMENT BUDGET; Salaries and Employee Benefits Budget Amount Regular Salary Extra Ilelp (Temporary) $ 35.663.00 _��_ Re[frement Retirement Social Security Tax 7 122 00 Employee Health Insurance Unemployment Insurance _ 1.680 00 Worker's Compensation Insurance Life Insurance 7 Other 600.00 Total 'Salaries and Employee Ecnaf2ta Services and Supplies S 50.379.00 Cotmunlcations Insurance S 966.00 Haintenance - Equipment --- -� Haintenance - Structures, Improveoents d Grounds 200.00 Office Expense —_ Professional 6 Specialized Services - 500.00 Rents d Leases - Equipment Rents 6 Leases - Structures Training Transportation and Travel Utilities 1 FM m Other Total Services and Supplies Fixed Assets (Items costing 5300 or more each) $ 7.118.00 Equipment Structures and Improvements L-11,969,00 Total Fixed Assets $ 11,969,00 Total Budget $ 69,466.00 -9-28 rtorly Cost Table $ 28,623.00 I $ 13,615 00 1 $ 13,614.00 I $13,614.00 149,466 00 P. SIGNATUREe (Title) (Title) -3- ' /'/ : - 121'LS.E:I�v= Sr:. -t•, .e� du;Y :e,v�=.!r:•l ix. :2;.�;}t�,�. Y Ie re . r SALARIES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: Detective 5 Salary "E" Step $ 21,694 00 Retirement 19 97% 4,732 00 Worker's Comp 6 7375% 1,462.00 Health Insurance $70 per month 840.00 Merit /Uniforms 3U0.00 TOTAL $ 28,628 00 Methodology: One detective will be required to coordinate all juvenile delinquency progran His responsibility will deel with prevention programs and educations) plogran dealing with juvenile crime prevention. The above figures represent the current Memorandum of Understanding with the County of San Bernardino in the Safety Unit, classification Sheriff's Detective. - t: T. Limited Duty Deputy Salary "C" Step $ 13,969 00 Retirement 19.97% 2,790.00 4' _ Worker's Comp. 6.7375% 941 00 Health Insurance $70 per month 840 00 Merit /Uniforms 300 00 TOTAL $ 18,840.00 ti Methodology: 7, One limited duty deputy will be required to assist in all prevention programs speak at seminars and assist in ali educational programs The above figures arc based on the current Memorandum of Understanding with the County of San Bernardino, Safety Unit, clasuification Limited Duty Deputy. OVCrTIME: Detective TOTAL $ 1,871.00 Methodology: Estimated overtime for a detective at the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Office is 10 hours pr_r month or 120 hours per year. 120 hours x salary at time and one half 015 59 /hour) Limited Duty Deputy TOTAL $ 1,040 00 Methodology: Estimated over "ime for a limited duty deputy is 10 hours per month or 12 o+ t �.C�.'w ;:n•`° w" �."�1'� +��:�j1X `4. � +..�W, �• }Yi��4J,aF: r� Padded Straight Back Chairs (4) $ 240 00 Telephone Table (1) 58 00 Five Drawer Filing Cabinet (1) 145 00 Wastepaper Basket (2) 6 00 Subtotal $ 935 00 6% Tax 54 00 ny ✓Y. L TOTAL $ 989.00 Methodology: The abo•a: items would be utilized to set up one office for the prevention program Figures based on prices obtained from Sheriff's Bureau of Administration Vehicle Equipment Vehicle Siren $ 234.00 _ Hand Held Red Light 25 00 First Aid Kit and Extinguisher 26 00 Remington 12 guage shotgun and case 140.00 Forensic Investigation Kit 200.00 Subtotal $ 625.00 6% Tax 38.00 TOTAL $ 663 00 FIXED ASSETS: Equipment On, • -narked Vehicle (Sedan) $ 6,536.00 6% Tay 392.00 TOTAL $ 6,928 00 Methodology: One vehicle will be necessaryy to be utilized by the officers in this program. Their responsibilities will be varied and a vehicle must be at their disposal Vehicle Equipment + Multi Channel Mobile Radio (1) $ 1,400 00 6% Tax 84.00 ,y TOTAL $ 1,487? G I �. c r1• y� •_ I Methodology: Vehicle must be equipped with a mobile multi - channel radio for communication with the base station and other units Multi Channel `sand Held Radio $ 1,300.00 6% Tax 78.00 TOTAL $ 1,378.00 Methodology: All units are equipped with a multi channel, hand held radio for use by offic when away from their vehicle This enables officers to have communication while on assignment 100% of the time. Audio Visual Equipment One Bell and Howell 16 mm_ w; projector, Model 1580 $ 800 OU One Bell and Howell Ringmaster Slide projector 375 00 Various 35 mm slides and films 500.00 Adjustable Screen 50 00 Olympia Manual Typewriter (1) 325.00 Subtotal $ 2,050.00 ' 6% Tax 129.00 e + 'TOTAL $ 2,179.00 ' Methodology: It will be necessary to have at our disposal the above equipment for use in educational seminars and other preventive programs. The above prices reflect the latest Bell and Howell and Olympia price listings J s� Y3. =�odu� Y S SE ^?°EL ?EE8 WnaoB$3 b °emu°. �vS'a i °� °c-�2355 Isau'.;E;ex Sr Z:E E> b a�gsE2! i 5t r rs j �Xr 1 - e °tea i EaE �m §u Q D � jLx I u 37 N! N E O F ° U E w G+'r�"%. c1.Y,f✓r.F.�n�`b v'.s ._ iM,.:�14.:ira'��F }r!• :'ti:'f %�.t�fi� +` +! Y fg; << N r SeFF� p_z a �� iWaifz 3�a31& p yyak a�(aa rFr�i� Si_aead�{`t C_a s —mra- It _ s �a b�Vyu3 <v Ea b'EE�Y3/ 48 a°i�':a # :isS ¢$$ ;Il o f 5I'3 i � =f sa iys 43 �s €Its !' > °fiea3g oaf 4 S_ a O �a i � i i g 4 33ta e f I- ell if s a a J� s =di314s °Fa' '�i B:.QSnF6'a I�e�1 41 Y39 YY 3$ab 71 'a cFS °y�i .lSS�2 =i Z oo a 3a b! + 5 I MO�i5� E v s J �y:3p 8JF �t£ia �J let!, 11.21 2 g 31 fl 332y# 3 d •� Pfis�Yy��E:i3 a F� n z =' Lbf. YC:! � alc 3yi c �s? u i ` N N N r4 ° _ FZ� � n N L-1 Ell E7 N C J. fg; << N r SeFF� p_z a �� iWaifz 3�a31& p yyak a�(aa rFr�i� Si_aead�{`t C_a s —mra- It _ s �a b�Vyu3 <v Ea b'EE�Y3/ 48 a°i�':a # :isS ¢$$ ;Il o f 5I'3 i � =f sa iys 43 �s €Its !' > °fiea3g oaf 4 S_ a O �a i � i i g 4 33ta e f I- ell if s a a J� s =di314s °Fa' '�i B:.QSnF6'a I�e�1 41 Y39 YY 3$ab 71 'a cFS °y�i .lSS�2 =i Z oo a 3a b! + 5 I MO�i5� E v s J �y:3p 8JF �t£ia �J let!, 11.21 2 g 31 fl 332y# 3 d •� Pfis�Yy��E:i3 COMMUNITY JUVENILE CRIME PREVENTION UNIT Need Statement: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a newly incorporated city of one year. Since July 1, 1978 the City of Rancho Cucamonga has contractei law enforcement protection from the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department During this period of time. July 1, 1978 through January 1, 1979, the City of Ranchu Cucamonga has experienced an approximate 50 percent rise in all index crimes, including violent crimes, homicide, rape, robbery, assaults and especially those in the burglary category. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has experienced approximately 316 residential burglaries, 65 commercial burglaries and 43 vehicle burglaries. This figure is substantial in that we now ha., approximately 25 patrol officers to police the city area and four detectives. It appears that because of the high influx of people moving to this area, as well as an increased juvenile delinquency problem, that something or some program mutt be instituted to lower the crime statistics in this area - As you know, in August we instituted a program in the Northtown Barrio area This program was designed to combat the increasing gang violence and high crime rate in the barrio area. As you know, the majority of this problem deals with juveniles from the ages of 12 through 18 years of age. In this index of crimes is included several major homicides, several robberies and other assaults and burglaries. This problem area has been attacked with a task force of detectives, which has substantially reduced the crime rate in this area. This indicates that any program that focuses ou a particular program can, in fact, work. We envision that with this AB -90 program, we would be able to institute several programs that would be effective in combatting juvenile crimes in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Several of these programs have been tried In other areas and have been extremely successful. In a recent survey by Law and Justice Planning, they found that most residents were concerned with burglaries It was also noted that most victims of burglaries do not identify their property properly and it becomes almost impossible to make any recovery. This type of a problem can be handled effectively with a neighborhood WdLeh Program We would attack heavy crime areas by instituting a Neighborhood Watch Program. This would be broken down into a block captain responsible for several blocks in his area The block captainswould host meetings in their homes where specific crime prevention programs would be presented by these personnel. The detective and the limited duty officer would hold lectures on burglary prevention, home security and operation identification. Each block member would compose phone lists of their neighbors to notify them of suspicious persons or activity in their neighborhood. The block captains would notify the police department of specific criminal activity occurring in their community and would supply the police department with their suspect and vehicle descriptions. Block captains would also convey this information to their neighbors, advising them to immediately notify the Sheriff's Department upon observation of those suspects and vehicles. F •i".r :-, -r. It has been shown in the Fontana Substation and in the Fontana Police Department city area that this program has an immediate and marked reduction in crime We feel that with a program such as this that we would receive more burglary in progress calla and would be more effective in reducing our burglary rate by on- sight arrests by patrol Other studies by the Law and Justice Planning Office indicate that when these programs are in effect that an almost 40 percent reduction pr3gram's annual cost is recovered through reduced dollar loss from burglary in the target areas. Savings which are hard to measure in dollars result from reduced police investi- gative expenses, reduced court costs and other criminal justice expenses and reduced suffering by burglary victims. Other programs that we envision would be one in reference to the student and the law This course would be designed to acquaint students with criminal law, civil and Constitutional rights, vehicle law and more significantly, what their responsibilities as citizens in our society We would also be interested in drug abuse seminars, a program designed for both the parents and the children, dealing with the danger of drug abuse and identifying drug abusers We feel that with this type of an approach we could accomplish a reduction in the crime rate involving juvenile offenders in the area of burglary and also,violent crime. We feel that we would also be able to establish a better police - community relationship. One important aspect of this program would be a better coordination between our office, the Probation Department and the Juvenile Court System Sometime in the future we envision the task force that is working on the Northtown Barrio area Lo be complete with their investigations. We feel that probably this detail will be pulled from the Rancho Cucamonga area, as it constitutes a demand of manpower and money that cannot be continued indefinitely We feel that if this occurs, this would leave a void in the Northtown area in reference to juvenile crime and within a year or two we would be back in the same situation as the prior six months. We feel a program designed to focus on the criminal problems occurring in the Northtown Barrio area would be well worth the money and certainly the effort. From examining our statistics for the last six months of our operation, particularly those in the burglary rate and in the homicide and attempt homicide rate, wo feel that a reduction of crime in these areas would be an immense benefit to the city and our department Certainly the citizens of this community would welcome any such program to assist them in the protection of their property and the guarantee of their Constitutional rights. •.yi ryy•f}�� s , L�e:.Y�!,�.{.��}�'•� \rwv ((..�h(�tiR�.a�..r .N's:ry`!'�fi'.w.2�fv ti'��Ai• �"6•.Ciy �'. 1�[_ to :. q. W . _ ...- .. d. .•+.• ....p...,, • .� n+ ... , T ya,.� '. RESOLUTION NO. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, supporting the Rancho Cucamonga Sberiff's Station's proposed Grant to finance a Community Juvenile Crime Prevention Unit under Assembly Bill 90. y V +'.:�A�'�. °;�. ...�•a� -u, ,yv -... .-'ti/"''- y^irQ.�# '4_1 -4w fa4if=y, M E M O R A N D U M Date: January 12, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Subject: Project H.O.Y. Request for Endorsement for Arrowhead Justice Association Grant Funding Background Project It O.Y. (Help Our Youth) is a CETA VIB Program whose funding will expire in March of this year Purpose of the project, as you know, Se a "delinquency prevention" program aimed at tae North Town area The City aided the project twice in 1977 by first supplementing their recreation supplies with equipment purchased byy City (approx- imately $1700 of the $2000 authorized) and second, by acting as their sponsor for the I.M.A. Sumer Youth Recreation Program Grant (approx- imately $2400) They are currently based at the "Contact Station" on 24th Street in the North Town area, with administrative offices in Ontario The project director is Sam Maestas, who replaced Lillian Rodriquez The parent organization for H 0 Y. is the National Institute for Community Development (N.I C D ) of San Bernardino, administered by Armando Navarro Situation As the funding for H 0 Y is due to expire in March, a new funding source is being sought to continue the program A proposal from N I.C.D. is attached asking for an "endorsement" by the Council of a "new" program and its goals -••The West End Comprehensive Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program. Summary of Proposal 1) Their proposed Program covers three jurisdictions, Ontario, Upland and Rancho Cucamonga 2) It is Project N O.Y under a different label. 3) It requires no City funding. 4) Deadline for proposal is February 1, 1979 -I- 75 �r Memo 1/12/79 To: L. Wasserman From: B Holley Subj: Project Hoy page 2 Staff Evaluation and Recommendation This proposal is lengthy and constructed of the rhetoric normally associated with a proposal of this nature Although requested twice, a "nuts and bolts" of just exactly what their program will do, how it will be done and by whom, continues to be cloaked in lofty goals 'r e goals of the program are good, prevent crime, encourage job ;:wining, community pride, etc. One cannot disagree with any goals stated without challenging the Flag, apple pie, and motherhood However, in my opinion, N.I.C.D. has not demonstrated through thia- proposal a process of achieving those goals Council should be aware that, while this item has not been placed on the Agenda, Mr Maestas and /or Mr Navarro intends to speak during the "Public" comment section of Agenda to request an endorsement by Council of proposal. Council has three basic options: 1) Endorse project as beneficial to the community. 2) Reject project endorsement. 3) Thank them for their presentation and take no action I recommend option number 3 I request that this memorandum be forwarded to Council as an "informational" item only, for the meeting of January 15. -� 2 ��.77,+�w,w�".f3��r"` 1 . yy, ���rvt�^,. rjj2LY?.t.vAt,' s:::•a._,e'•[•.'r.,:.'r1;,ycy'. 1_i.- , -. l - �... .• a"�..•7`f�L`.�I,h,���_^hr'Sn' wJ� � = \.:k: i,�,. +f.�r.: -r�� ~r .(M'��.�!.; "•� ���amRSa ti`L�1.`5t :. r �5'.� 4r�r.Nw• .. a . . -tM^ _�r~• r «. Y V INSTITUTE Da. ARMANoo NAVARto Firnb,r Dotfmr WA Rulto Are. Sm DemuJ,w. Ca 92410 714 8s94348 FOR COMMUNITY lAnuary 12, 1979 To he Mayor and City Council of Rancho Cucamonga: The proposal presently before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Is designed to provide a coordinated, comprehensive plan to deal with the existing crisis of gang violence in the Rancho Cucamoago area Presently, there Is no such program in the area attempting to deal with yauh related problems and, specifically, the tendency of barrio youth to Join gangs which are destructive to prnporti, lives and themselves. Since the proposal Is designed to meet the neede of the Rancho Cucamonga ere &, we ask that you support its goals In this initial and crucial stage. We believe that if we receive the endorsement of each of the local governments of the target areas, the comprehensive results envisioned will be realized % Sincerel n o ,avarro, Executive Director AN /lg V 1230 L 6th SL OnUrio, Ca. 91764 714 983.2674 714 9833671 q7 i i,nT , J. •- ...Yr..' .ti�i :r•LeI.°.r. J, e�(` fJ.a TIONAL INSTITUTE 99R- FOR Da, Atwan.0O Navatao faeran,e Doettme 1730 E 6th St 394 Rialto Ave. Ontuio, Ca. 91764 :an Bernudtno, G 92410 714 983.2674 714.8894348 714 9832673 The National Insititue for Community Development, a nen- profit, United Way Agency, 13 proposing a Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program to service youth from the Cntario /Rancho Cucamonga /Upland area. the goal of the agency is to provide traditional, yet innovative services to troubled youths. NICD, through its present juvenile delinquency prevention program, Project Help Our Youth (HOY). Is viewed in the communities as a grassroots or street agency] however, It deals with new problems as they arise and develops relevant and community oriented programs-to meet new needs. NICD is committed to providing services In low- income, minority communities The totality of the agency's Involvement in those cootsunlclea has enabled the agency to accurately assess, first -hand, community problems such as gong violence, delinquency, unemployment and educational problems. To deal with these problems, and In keeping with Project Hoy's primary purpose of reaching out and working with Youth who feel alleneted and disenfranchised, the agency has three major goals which serve as the basis for all its programs, projects and activities These goals are: 1. Services to hard -to -reach youth: These are youth who often show aggressive, hostile behavior. Because of this snit- social behavior, they find themselves at odds with the Institutions and systems with which they come In contact, e.g , the school, law enforcement, and at times, the community 2 Advocacy: This Is work an behalf of youth to help them deal better with the system and function In three important areas: the Juvenile justice system, the educational system and the field of employment. 3 Community Involvements Community members are part of planning and decision- making In the agency to more effectively meet community needs In addition to the hiring and training of community workers. NICD staff helps community and public officials make their needs known and to seek Imput to various funding decisions The clients served by Project Hoy are primarily low-income minority Youth who live in the barrio areas of the cities served. Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga and Upland. They are both male and female, range i / NATIONAL INSTITUTE Da. AattAwaa NAVAtaa Fairview Dnrrlor 891 Rialto Ave. San Bctoudinu, G. 92116 711 8891148 FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT t230 E 6th St Daunt. 4 91161 714 983.2671 714 9SS 2475 in age from eight to eighteen, and are of varlcaa religious backgrounds. Most have learning and behavioral difficulties at school or are drop -outs; they have been in difficulty with law enforcement, and their parents may have very little control over or,1n many cases, lack interest In them. The older clients are unemployed, or unemployable because of the lack of job and /or acadcmlc skills. Clients are referred to Project Itoy by schools• probablan, police, courts, other w;tencles, families, friends, and self - referrals. Also, the Project tiny staff Is comprised, _ of highly skilled outreach workers who are able to seek our "reluctant" clients. Therefnre, Project May continues to be totally committed to serving the critical needs of youth. As such• it is geared to working for relevant education, reducing street violence and crime',' reducing the number of Youth being processed by the juvenile justice system and preventing poly -drug abuse and delinquency. Project Hoy secs the enhancemert of a Positive self -image among our youth as a important prrt of its work, and, therefore, is constantly attempting to develop service modalities (programs and activities) which contribute to our younsters positive feelings about themselves. They feel out of touch with a world In which they have little control and have a difficult time dealing with. The use of drugs, gang Involvement, or delinquent behavior, 1s their way of coping with their every -day problems. Project ]toy seeks to provide them with Rlternative survival skills which will enable them to deal more effectively and positively with the environment In which they find themselves �71�,'VEs�etjd Coopre enaivc!JuCv4gS jD..}nqueog& Weypp.Lloa_PFQBFBma__ which proposes to continue to accomnlish the above goals, will be operating from the following three ommunity facilities currently in ope-atlon: Ontario: 1230 East Sixth Street Rancho Cucamonga: 10155 twenty- fourth Street Upland: 1248 North Ctmpus Street r w:...r--.-. rY, NtkTIONAL DL ARMANen NAVAAna L.I,Nhw Qu,,to, 894 Rialto Arc San Brrnudino. G 97410 714 969.4348 t�' t� i 4• r . FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1730 E 6th St. Ontario, G. 91764 714 983.7674 714 9633673 to_SWtE yip7cncg: &iB bther,dikfTt give or Ctim3Aal„behaYIOr.:,t at_is ga'ogsp]a'je3:0i : ag4:{n ' negG[ ;Yla soC1n1.1Geraitig., The project 1s designed to provide such alternatives to 1,000 high -risk youth over a one -year period In the Ontario /Rancho 6ucamongs /Upland area. Basic to this goal Is the crertion of programs which wail divert youth with a high potential for becoming involved With gang activities before they become vulnerable to negative peer pressure Research indicaces that youth tend to join gangs for a variety of masons associated with the vicious cycle of poverty which confronts them daily. Rence, only a project that seeks to mollify the problem in a multiplicity of ways will be successful. Specifically, the holistic approach denotes a more comprehensive, multi- faceted, and total methodology Furthermore, it propounds the importance of Involving not just the affected parties, but all the community in collectively dealing with the problem Integral to the approach Is maximizing and more efficiently coordinating already existing resources, governmental agencies and civic groups Into working in s more cooperative way. Thus, oaly through the combined efforts of concerned lndividuils, groups, and zgrncies will the problems of juvenile delinquent•• and gang violence ceagc to be probl ems . The Nestend Comprehensive Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program will, therefore, In the coming year, seek funding for a variety of programs which, in their successful implenentation, will interlock In the three geographical areas to form the required comprehensive Project Lspe" r3Ffjcitjly,:tTip:prdject:seekg to ecFiimpl�s'fi -�kjtS J�llovg blaFHjyps: GF �6h'Bhdkt Establish a Job bank Information and Feferral system, which will help targeted youth in securing employment and /or career development. Specifically, this means&U$'rta Y11LbCiLlliaZ cd 0,4% tdp vdirk7`ng with local lnddustiy End buslneasea.to ;ski yp WprenticeoAp programs aAB -jobs. (2CCd=muTdtY'peyelaomentlI A Barrio Beautification Project, which will Include a mural project and horticulture program , will serve •o instill positive community ethics, positive attitudes and norms of pride and respect for self, community and property, NATIONAL INSTITUTE i Da. AnNANno NAVAra0 FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Errrrtiw Dirrrror • 1230 E 6th SL Dntuit 'i 91764 894 Beln Ave. 714 983-2674 Stn 8894348 4 92410 714 983.2673 711.8894318 C3.'7'RedtebYYSitTk6k'caet The establishment of a viable recreation will be a third major objective A well planned and organized recreation program can result in instilling youth with mental dls;ipline and serve as a pressure valve to release excess frustrution. Such a program would be coordinated with other agencies and programs, a.g , goys Club, YMCA, etc. C4 _ 'Sdd14T'Sdrvices; This wtegorty includes delinquency prevention services through family, individual and group counseling and supportive services, work with first time offenders, potential delinquents. Services incluo, work with gang groups, establishing liaison with police and courts, providing therapeutic evaluation, active outreach, etc The purpose Is to provide positive youth development and to eliminate negative social learning. [Si ' Youth'llevel6osentt This will be realized by training ten gang related individuals annually in the fundamentals of community organization They will be instructed and involved in the establishment of the various community services, 71tey, in turn, will involve other gang related youth in the actual implementation and utillzstion of the p- ograms. Q: "1C uc3t %'iIy'17eval e[ter will be produced to provide youth with a means of expression and corrounication. All articles, art work; poems" etc, will be written and edited by youth from various barrios, [g, ^•7tRL hour`Crlao'lb"terJedtion Tlbtline: The Hotline will serve as a means of commurication to relay informmation relative to gang violence in the street and to intervene in racial conflicts In the schools in order to prevent such crises. Q:"TdFFrif= Youtit�'Covnells;" Integral to the success of the project Is the Involvement of parents and youth in the planning and Implementation of the programs. Therefore, the Project will seek to establish a Council to provide ideas and feed -back, This Council will also eventually become part of the management and coordination aspect of the Project, �0; r'PraArom Iioeid; This will be composed of representatives from churches, community organizations, civic groups, and governmental agencies, and will serve as a community linkage system, 9 NATIONAL INSTITUTE DL ARMANao NAVARAO E ttw,W D,,,, 01 894 Rialto Arc San Bernardino, Ci 92410 714.889.4348 ate;,. , 1 `%,a�.�l'}'.4:•{r^� �• • A.. 1U�4�✓'�i"••:�;LY7�ir�;'a4��_��� °1 ®ir• t; Lit 17 1 4•aw. X.. _ .. 3 FOR COMMUNITY DEVEL[ MO E 6th St Ontario, Ca. 91764 714 983.2674 714 983.2673 (11.x, T_ r6Rfgri'BVa1UA'tTWf . A written report at the end of the year fs the final goal This report would be an analysis of how successfu the Project vas, and contain vcluable suggestions on how to proceel with future similar programs should funding be continued Supportive Units To ensure that the youth of these three communities receive maximum - benefits from this Project, local residents, loyal agencies, and the Youth of the area will work together through three linkage systemar 1 Program Board made up of representatives of the public agencies. staff, concerned citizens, and other agencies will meet regularly to share information, referrals, resources and deal collectively with community problems that are too large for a single agency to solve. 2. Parent -Youth Councl3I are designed to organize both parents and youth to prevent juvenile delinquency. NICD will assist these Councils in gaining information from law enforcement agencies and other groups on what methods can be used co prevent ctame in their neighbor- hoods. Once the Councils are functioning, representatives from the Councils will create a community Council network, thus promoting community cohesiveness and citizen awareness Also, through this network, positive community events will find broader support, and activities destructive to be lifestyles In Ontario, Ranch Cucamonga, and Upland can be dealt with in an organized manner. 1 A �1„-at V �r v� s.•.�y e1.. 7�y f i N NATIONAL INSTITUTE S FOII COMMUNITY Da. AxMANao NAVARRO Eirrarhv Darrror 894 Rulto Are Srn BCrNldma, 4 92410 714-889 4348 a• L Budget: I. Personnel: 1230 E. 6th St Ontuio. G. 91764 714 993.2674 714 993.2673 1 Project Director 1005 @ $1,000 /mo. $12,000 3 Assistant Coordinators 1005 @ $873 /ma. 20,000 1 Secretary /Bookkeeper 1001 @ $700 /mo. 8.400 $40,400 Fringe Benefits 15% 6,600 Ten Youth Community Workers, 15hrs each /t•. @ 3100 21600 II Operating Expenses: Rent (300 /mo.) S3,600 Utilities (100 1mo.) 1,200 Telephone (100 /mo.) 1,200 Equipment: file cabinet 100 typewriter (50 /mo. rent) 600 desk and chairs 300 office supplies 1,000 Xeroxing 200 Newsletter (1,500 /qt X 3) j X 500 Supplies 150 Travel gas mileage @ .15 per mile 1,000 Total Operating Expenses 11,000 :7_ 80,400 City Match 00.00 Youth Councils , .i7 PBOa'Wl BOARD Project Director Secretary yi Bookkeeper Youth Councils -- CGUABIO Pancho Cuc~i=onra _ -- Vpland Area Coordinator I I Area Coordinator Area Coordinator i Youth Worker Youth '�orr ker • Youth ilorker ^! = `w•V.'+i.•i :loti••v...: • �'::�•+- ''ry',F`; r,.'" ;.•`a �'= ''i:'Fr?`.%+. .,,Z. �^'a+'s .. r.:. 'e ,•, �•'-' -1� � a•Y L' w.w....,..t+r,•�u.. n �S S DATE: January 4, 1979 TO: All General Managers and City Administrators of the Omnitrans Board of Directors i FROM: Paul G. Marsh, General Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement Enable Non - Elected Offi- cials to vote in absence of Member - At the meeting of the Omnitrans Board of Directors held on December 6th, 1978, said Board amended the Omnitrans' Joint _•.�. Y Powers Agreement to enable lected officials to (, apa A,yi, during the absence o the CH-Ma o is a , as U:o caaQ arises. Transmitted is a copy of the amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement. Please resent this document to y and authorization for your Mayortorexecuteouncil ' a for approval I x After your Council's approval, please contact this office in i order that the original document may be forwarded to you for signature. v PAUL G MARSH, GENERAL MANAGER t 9' PGM:mrc 1•' ,r, r I' i tr - fj CITY OF RANCt:O CUCAAICYGA AC MIIISTRAVO1J JAN 5 1978 Alt 7181910014411213141 1G 183 SOUTH "G" STREET* SAN OEONAnDINO• CALIFonNIA 02410 • TFLEPIIONE (714) 3835223 / l■': : {i,9ij,.+. •.:Ai+ -o'.; �• _ .. .� , W t «+i rtu.�.:.t!''4�' •. '1j�'s.: +, y...,'� • C�r^ = ??.w±.........�... -.. -.. .+.. .w:- ,1.v,. +.. +.+rte+` ... ��� _•': f el'a JDINT POWERS AMENDMENT THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF MONTCLAIR CHINO, COL ON FONTANA, LOMA LINDA, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINOUANDOUPLANDEDLANDS, CREATING A COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OMNITRANS ". THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for convenience on the 1st day Of December, 1978, is entered Into by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and the CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all Of which are bodies politic In the State of California W 1 T H E S S E T H: WHEREAS, the parties forming OMNITRAUS. authority, desire a Joint powers to amend the ONNITRANS' Joint Powers Agreement to Provide that appoint.+d alternate members of the Board of Directors may be either elected or non - elected officials of the member agencies Of OMNITRANS; and WHEREAS, this am.ndnent will provide for the efficient operation of ONHITRANS; NOW, THEREFORE, the Partlas to the OMNITRANS' Joint Paw. rs Agreement agree as follows: 1 Section 3 A of the OMNITRANS' Joint Powers Agreement dated March 8, 1978 1s hereby amended to read as follows: "SECTION 3. GOVEONING BOARD A. MeA. Mc -hiP The Authority (OMNITRANS) shall be administered I ',7.�{.,'•''••�ry -..•r fit:: .'•. _... �''Y- •[y�iri Y`J:' � - .- - ••- •--- •..T.- _.�"..wr�� _�... , a� r s by a Board of Olrectors The membership of Board of Directors shall co the designated Ma nslst of an officially Mayor r or Council member City led Member from each Of San Bernardino all Each Supervisors of the County "Point an alternate to An member of the Board may absence. An serve in his or her alternate may be either an or non- e'acted official elected Director that oPPoln [ed of the member agency of the shall serve alternate Alte erve that appointed time Period designated by nthes Board Member serve in an official C them Alternates shall vote only in the abs opacity and be entitled to ante of the official representatives•,, ? Z• All other •' in in Provisions 11 of the OMNI TRANS, shall remain in full force and affect, Joint Powers Agreement ? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, �s Agreement Amendment to 6e executed Parties hereto have caused *, ti+ hove wrlthcreunto duly authorized, and aa of tt he day their Proper s 7, Y and year first "Datad: '.;ATTEST: ;• COUNTY OF SAIL BEBNAnD rk of th Board e INO :N tad: Chairman, Board of Supervisors jTTEST: CITY fi. OF CHINO ;-ltY Clerk Mayor t. -2. �•.. 77 J� �� .•`h't �,7ai'r:eFSti...�.:•••r•_tI..Y. N ♦ _..-;. : ?�,+.,.r „l:nr„�,(, Dated: ATTEST: CITY OF COLTON CI t Clerk Dated: Mayor ATTEST- CITY OF FONTANA City Clerk Dated: Mayor ATTEST: CITY OF LOMA LINDA Cityity Cl� -� Dated: i ATTEST: •t ♦✓ .•rL CITY OF MONTCLAIR CItY Clcrk r -4-4 w Dated. Mayor _ ATTEST —�— CITY OF ONTARIO CI t Clark Dated: Mayor ATTEST: CITY OF RAtICNO CUCAMONGA CItY Clerk Dated: Mayo r ATTEST: CITY OF REDLANDS 1;+• "r Ctty Clerk �,• Dated: N ayor ' ATTEST: CITY OF RIALTO Y City Clerk «. r Ilayor r Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: ATTEST P City Clark m CITY OF SAM BERNARDINO Mayor CITY OF UPLAND Mayor H E H 0 R A N D U H To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Date: January 11, 1979 Subject: Baseball Field Improvement to Vineyard Park Request authorization to expend $3,202 87 from account 40- 50 -02, Capital Improvements- Vineyard Park. This account was bugeted and approved by Council in the amount of $50,000 in the current budget cycle The nature Df the expenditure is a "share coat" ro ect to im rove p and modify the two sports fields at Vineyard Park Specificn ly, Citrus Little League is financing the in progress grading of the new lower senior field ($7,200), brick dust for the base paths (cost is estimated at $900) and senior backstop on the lower field ($1000 -$1200 estimated) They have,with these expenses, encumbered the bulk of their monetary resourses They request that the City provide the re air and updating of the irrigation system at the upper field ($1361 90) and installation of an irrigation system to the new senior field ($1840 97) (This "very low" price for design, purchase and installation of fully automated irrigation system is attributed to the interest and participation of a local landscape contractor, Dick Clement, in the youth sports program in our community Design and specifications alone, if bid out, would approach $801), and the total job'would be approximately $7000- $8000,- based on costs at Alta Loma Park). This is a good expenditure as it will: 1) Improve the appearance and serviceability of a segment of Vineyard Park; 2) Reduce watering time and waste encountered with a manual system (this will save the City money as we pay water charges for the park); 3) Improve upkeep maintenance operation capabilities These fields are used year around, by Little Leaggue, Pop Warner Football and with the expansion of the lower field, will be capable of supporting soccer activities this fall Request an agenda dare of January 15 to present this item to Council for consideration 160 t _ ) 7 e to tt t= t) u ,a if U 14 Lb t: n a a h x )1 )t )t k )1 )1 )f IppYC� /aF T K 1.C1�C FwxF - - Am _ --FZAD i — _ _(T 1 I j 11'2Z L T/ T� T 3 _ ' �i8f'f IT I - I T! I / +r P SaH Al— Q, F4S_ I I a1 I f v�s I /s sal Ivt3 4c S =/ y yet I _ All �3 Pte O 4 uG I� 10 /' /t' f UC G'DaP�i.ri9 I 'ff8 /� I 3a / Odc G1ou� /,Y/g 73 � I S IyR" &U,955 do- / 5i/ pY I 380 /i /�ii 01/.965 -20o /' ss / ei I II � TT 9 -- Yo /ck l) Z eld- 1.9T/o,J Z, q L PiN _ 73G2 I 989 —. - !f1972� C1vcE�vsc G d S / i i J � I 1 t 7 e ) 6 ) Y ) t ) Y e f 0 t ) ) s 6 ) e 9 0 t 7 J i1 p Y i9 0 ) J. it 3 5 6 6 9 10 II I= II Is 16 17 It 19 K tl 1= I= 1, K K I/ I6 It W 11 1= u u Is 16 11 Il is t11 � n a� i [NMI .In m immmm1n 17E 3 5 6 6 9 10 II I= II Is 16 17 It 19 K tl 1= I= 1, K K I/ I6 It W 11 1= u u Is 16 11 Il is t11 t M E H O R A N D U M Date: January 12, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Subject: Community Development Block Grant Funding Project Yearr 79 -80, 80 -81 and 81 -82 D; The Board of Supervisors on January 9 adopted the attached 3 year CDBG program for Rancho Cucamonga's HUD allocation. `• The City was fortunate in having its. initial dollar estimate of $330,000 - 375,000 for the 3 year program increased, after discussion, to $533,700. ?' Further, the Office of Community Development honored our requests ` of shifting $100,000 from 81 -82 to 79 -80 for park acquisition, and F' advancing 535,000 from 79 -80 to 78 -79 (present cycle) for the engineering and design of the road Improvements in the target area. The Citizen's Participation Advisory Committee, chaired by Nacho Gracia, has been involved by the City through,-it this entire campaign and feels that the City has been responsive t, their input Feedback s• would tend to indicate that a positive relationship between the residents of the target area and the City is beginning to solidify. BH /mw IT- /a3 4 '� 'r + ! 1979 -80 CDDG APPLICATION PROPOSED THREE YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA PROPOSED P 1979 -80 1980.81 1981 -82 (YEAR PIVE) ( YEAR SIX) (YEAR SEVEN) TOTAL HOUSING PROGRAMS ALLOCATION DY HOC SING NEED Street Tmprovements *- Reimbursement to County - (35,000) (35,000) Construction of curb, Rut- $203,574 <203,, SjL tars, sidewalk, and match— up between Archibald and Haven, Santa Fe Railroad and 26th Street - Storm drains an Foothill Blvd Recreation Improve...[. 100,000 127,740 227,740 - Park facility South of Foothill between Archibald Avenue and Haven Avenue Contingency /Local Options 33,693 33,693 67,386 TOTAL $372,267 -0- ,$161.433- —� $533,700 'TOTAL CAPITr,L IMPROV-4ENT ALLOCATION rOR FIRST FOUR YEAR`:: $ 420,192 TOTAL EXPENDED TO DATE *: $ 47,522 *Does not include funds expended for housing Programs. COMMENTS: An advance of $35,000 is proposed from the County's Co,tingency fund in Program Year 4 to Complete engineering design of street improve.eats Funds to be reps td in Year 5 as indicated. u- nn -, -ra, 35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONTRACT AWARD - SIGNALS AT RASCLINE AND ARCHIBALD AND FOOTHILL AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD Bids have been received on the above referenced traffic signal projects being constructed under the County Carrywer Program. The low bid was by Stolny 6 Cmpany of $168,611 00 The Engineer's Estimate was $148,524.00 or 112 under the actual bid. Attached 1• a letter from the County listing the bid ata ary and recd endfng award of the project The Engineering Division has analyzed the bids ant concurs in their recoa mendatlon RECOMMENDATION: That Council move to accept bids for the construction of traffic signals at Baseline and Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road and to recommend to the County Board of Supervisors the award of the Contract to the law bidder, Staley 6 Company. Respectfully s ,mmityteedd, LLOYIPffunBs City Engineer LH:deb • TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 975 Eon Third Suaat -San Barrmdino. CA 92415 • 17141 393.1365 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Lloyd: 40 January 4, 1979 This is a status report regarding the two signal constructiun projects located at the intersections of Archibald and Baseline and of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga. Bids were opened on December 29, 1978 with the following results: Contractor Total Bid Steiny b Company $168,611.00 Paul Gardner Corp. 176,961.50 Smith Electric 185,660.00 The Engineer's Estimate was $148,524.00 and the low bidder was 13% over it. He feel this difference can be attributed to the general increase due to in- flation. it is our feeling t,• -t we have received fair bids and will recommend iward to the low bidder. Steiny E Company. As you know, your City Council has approved both projects to concept by Council resolutions in past months. It would be additionally desirable, at this time, to have the City Council's concurrence with our recommendation to sward to the low bidder, Steiny b Company, before the item is presented to the Board of Supervisors for their approval We anticipate placing the item before the Board of Supervisors on their January 29, 1979 agenda. At this time we are also seeking approval to award from Caltrans because they are participating in half of the intersection at San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. We would, therefore, appreciate your presenting this to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for their concurrence prior to the Board of Supervisor's meeting on January 29, 1979. Very truly yours, 11 E C (d [ ® John R. Shone CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ctor of Transportation COMMUNITY DEWIOPIAENT DEPT. (/ . JAN 0 8 19/9 el Alt PH Michael G. Walker 7181911011112111213141516 Assistant Road Commissioner - Administration A MGW:ch .... ,.. ri /y� n 1 :arl 1 .. 1 1 6 •1 r11.r.liNp ••• I IInn1111U IIb1w51'Ib ♦•unw ll .u.r •" // IA :••, ti:aMY .... r .. rf 1111L.111 Iw.n lr , County of San Bernudino =� PUBIICHUSAGFNCT .a roww w swore OY..,a.1 T,«+.,~ January 4, 1979 This is a status report regarding the two signal constructiun projects located at the intersections of Archibald and Baseline and of San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga. Bids were opened on December 29, 1978 with the following results: Contractor Total Bid Steiny b Company $168,611.00 Paul Gardner Corp. 176,961.50 Smith Electric 185,660.00 The Engineer's Estimate was $148,524.00 and the low bidder was 13% over it. He feel this difference can be attributed to the general increase due to in- flation. it is our feeling t,• -t we have received fair bids and will recommend iward to the low bidder. Steiny E Company. As you know, your City Council has approved both projects to concept by Council resolutions in past months. It would be additionally desirable, at this time, to have the City Council's concurrence with our recommendation to sward to the low bidder, Steiny b Company, before the item is presented to the Board of Supervisors for their approval We anticipate placing the item before the Board of Supervisors on their January 29, 1979 agenda. At this time we are also seeking approval to award from Caltrans because they are participating in half of the intersection at San Bernardino Road and Foothill Boulevard. We would, therefore, appreciate your presenting this to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council for their concurrence prior to the Board of Supervisor's meeting on January 29, 1979. Very truly yours, 11 E C (d [ ® John R. Shone CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ctor of Transportation COMMUNITY DEWIOPIAENT DEPT. (/ . JAN 0 8 19/9 el Alt PH Michael G. Walker 7181911011112111213141516 Assistant Road Commissioner - Administration A MGW:ch .... ,.. ri /y� n 1 :arl 1 .. 1 1 6 •1 r11.r.liNp ••• I IInn1111U IIb1w51'Ib ♦•unw ll .u.r •" // IA :••, ti:aMY .... r .. rf 1111L.111 Iw.n lr , I 7 n i t n y e r a rY c 0 M r P h b V e nu an nu Co re Y we n C TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 15, 19 9 TO: City Manager a d City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, C ty Engineer SUBJECT: FEDERAL AID UR BAN (FAU) PROJECT SELECTION At the January 3, 1979 mee ing of the City Council, the Engineering Division indicated that prior to Ja wry 31, 1979 the City is required to designate Its portion of 1978 Highwa Act Federal Aid Urban funds to specific projects for submittal to the San B rnardina Association of Government (SANBAC) Execu- tive Board and onto Seethe n California Association of Governments (SCAC) for - submittal to the Transport tion Improvement Program. At this meeting it vas ind cared that the Federal money available to the City was $275,000. Ore to car over project commitments from previous years the m Technical Advisory Coitt a (TTAC) voted at its January 10, 1979 meeting to reduce the population fund by $260,000 This effectively reduced funds avail- able to Rancho Cucamonga t approximately $230,000 of Federal funds. The FAU fundo are allocated to be tched by a 155 City share Total project funds for budget purposes is the efore $270,500 ($230,000 Federal, $40,500 City). The Council should select rojects to expend an estimated $270,500 As indicated previously, t e Staff has been working closely with the Advisory Councils the past few moat a and on January 10, 1979 developed a recommended FAU program. This program is as follows: Estimated Coat 1. Baseline from ineyard to Hellman and Archibald to east of Ramon a - Resurfacing and reconstruction $100,000 H 2. Baseline and llwn Avenue - Traffic Signals 60,000 3. Archibald Ave a and Church Street - Traff lc Signals 60,000 4. {Liven Avenue d Amber Street - Traffic Signals ��+� 60,000 5. Archibald Ave a and Nineteenth Street - Traffic Signals 60,000 TOTAL $ 340,000 It was the intent of the until, to over program the funds and to hold the traffic Archibald and Nineteenth signal as a contingency project. The proposed program was developed to cognize the need to select projects which can be processed moat effective) through the Federal bureaucracy Projects requiring right of way acquisition re eliminated and =jet projects were not selected because of insufficient f u ds. The Engineering Division fully concurs with the la e • • FEDERAL AID URBAN (FAU) PROJECT SELECTION January 15, 1979 Page 2 Advisory Council recommendation and feels that these are projects tF• .dn be quickly developed and constructed to take advantage of the earls possible funding. Upon approval by the Council of an TAU program, the Engineering Divi- sion can begin immediately to process these projects The first step in this process will be to rataim an Engineer to prepare design plans and bid documents This coat will be approximately $30,000 and will be city funded. The Engineering Division is also pleased to report that at the January 10, 1979 meeting of the Transportation Technical Advisory Committee, the combined Rancho Cucamonga /Ontario project to widen and Improve Vineyard Avenue from Arrow Route to the San Bernardino Freeway was selected as the number one jectocostp$836,000. Thist portion of project are 90the• community ras will the number two project which will reconstruct Baseline from the City limits to Campus Avenue in the City of Upland. Engineering feels that Rancho Cucamonga will be the prime beneficiary of the entire 1.1 million dollar regional alloca- tion under the 1978 highway Act. Attached as further background is the Council packet for the January 30 1979 meeting. REC@DfENDATION: That the Council adopt the Federal Aid Urban Project Program as proposed by the Advisory Councils. Respectfully submittesj, LLOYD B. MUBBS, City Engineer LPN:nm L FAU FUND DISTRIEUTION NEST VALLEY (ANNUAL ALLOCATION) FOUR YEAR PROGRAM s Total per year based on 1977/78 $870,120 Regional projects 501 435,060 Transit projects 51 43,506 Agencies - allocated by population 451 391,554 LOCAL AGENCY FUNDS PER YEAR Population Percent Funds Chino 31,000 13 49 52,821 Montclair 22,651 9 86 38,607 Ontario 66,600 28 98 113,472 Upland 40,450 17 60 68,914 Noncho Cucamonga 40,470 17.61 68,953 San Bernardino County 28.65. 12.46 48,787 229,830 100 00 391,554 d x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FAH ROUTES STREET LIMITS 1. Havel, Avenue Highland to Wilson Arrov Route to AT 6 SF Railroad 2 Vineyard /tomelinn South City Limit to .. ate 30 3. Baseline West City Limit to Haven 4. Foothill West City Limit to Haven Etivanda Avenue to East City Limit 5 Arrov Route Crova to Haven 6 Hellman Avenue Arrow Route to Baseline 7. Archibald Avenue Fourth Street to Route 30 B. Turner Avenue Arrow Route to Baseline c. RECOMMENDED FEDERAL AIL URBAN PROJECT LIST 1. Baseline — Vineyard to Hellman /Archibald to Hermoon Major resurfacing $100,000 2. Archibald Avenue and Church Street Signals 60,000 7. Baseline and Hellman Avenue Signals 4. Archibald Avenue and Fourth Street Signals 60,000 60,000 • 5. Alternate Project — Vineyard Avenue and Arrow Route Signals 60,000 * This project could be constructed in conjunction with the proposed regional project if approved by the Technical Advisory Comaittee on Jsnuary 10 m r Cat Tax SB 325 Federal Aid Urban Subtotal Normal Hainrenance STREETS AND HIGHWAYS FIVE YEAR FUNDS PROJECTION TABLE I 78 -79 79 -80 $380,000 $40,000 440,000 375,000 70,000 $620,000 $885,000 380,000 500,000 80-81 $462,000 400,000 70,000 $932,000 550,000 o _ 81 -82 82 -83 83 -84 $466,000 $510,000 $535,000 425,000 450,000 450,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 $981,000 $1,030,000 $1,055,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 Capital Improvement $440,000 $385,000 $382,000 $381,000 $330,000 $225,000 Funds Available HUB Block Grant Funds 5250,000 County Budget S 150,C00 Carryover Estimated CIP Funds 2.573,000 (5 years) Available UCD Fund - 250,000 Funds Committee to - 700,000 Cucamonga Creek (Estimated) Funds Committed to - 400,000 Deer Creek (Estimated) 2 C, $1,223,000 Available Funds for Maintenance 6 Construction Projects. LONG RANGE ROADWAY NEED INVENTORY NEED MAINTENTANCE 1. Resurfacing $ 994,000 483,000 2. Minor Widening 180,000 3. Misc. — Maintenance MAJOR PROJECTS 4,275,000 TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND CONTROL 930,000 NEW CONSTRUCTION UNDETERMINED TOTAL $ 6,862,000 DRAINAGE IHPROVE24ENT NEEDS S 485,000 PROTECTS MASTER PLAN IMPROVEKENTS $ 38,000,000 i PROPOSED PIVB YEAR PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 78 -79 1. Cucamonga Channel Bridge 79 -80 1. Cucamonga Channgel Bridges $ 260,000 2 Baseline Overlay (FAU) 101,000 3. Signal - Archibald 6 Church (FAU) 6n,000 4. Signal - Baseline 6 Hellman (FAU) 60,000 h 5. Signal - Archibald E Fourth (FAU) 60,100 6 North Town Street Improvements (;IUD) 250,0,10 7. Baseline Widening - Beryl to Lion 30,001 S. Baseline Wideninz - 600' east of 30,000 Archibald - north side 80 -81 1. Deer Creek Bridges 81 -82 1. Deer Creek Bridge $ 100,000 2 Carnellan Street Overlay 30,000 Banyan to Orange 3. Archibald Avenue Hisc. Maintenance 100,000 4 Hisc Maintenance Overlay _ 88,000 from Priority List 82 -83 1. Major Maintenance Projects $ 200,000 from Priority List 2. Major Project Design 60,000 83 -84 1. Major Maintenance Projects $ 185,000 from Priority List 2. FAU Program Development for 70.000 New Highway Act TOTAL COUNTY CARRYOVER CONT TOTAL c 440,000 850,000 300,000 318,000 260,000 255,000 $ 2,423,000 150,000 $ 2,573,000 • MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROJECTS r1 U a Eligible for PAO Funding STREET LIMITS ESTIMATED COST a 1. Baseline Avenue Vineyard to Rollman /Archibald to Ramona $ 100,000 2. Carnelian Street Bany..n to Orange 30,000 a 3. Archibald Avenue 4th Street to 19th - Hisc. 400,000 4. Alta Cuesta Red Hill to Camino Norte 12,000 5. Arrow Routs Hadrone to Vineyard 20,000 6. Victoria Street Etivanda to Pecan 12,000 a 7 Etiwanda Avenue 19th Street to 23rd Street 40,000 a S. Etivanda Avenue I -15 to Baseline 35,000 9. East Avenue 19th Street to Summit 25.000 10 Hermosa Avenue Lemon to Banyan 15,000 11. Hellman Avenue 100' south Alta Loma to Orange 10,000 12 Baseline Day Creek to Rochester 15,000 13 Baseline Etivanda Avenue to City Limit 20,000 14 Various Local Streets 260.000 TOTAL $ 994,000 a Eligible for PAO Funding RECOMMENDED MINOR RIDENING PRIORITY Eligible for FAU Funding STREET LIMITS ESTIMATED COST • 1. Baseline Beryl to Lion S 30,000 • 2. Baseline 600' cast of Archibald - narrh side 30,000 3. Ninth Street Grove to Vineyard 30,000 4. Archibald Avenue Hillside to Banyan 25,000 • 5. Arrow Route Archibald to Haven 60,000 6. Carnelian Street Wilson to Beachwood 10,000 7 Hillside Road Sapphi ;e to Pear] 15,000 _ 8. Turner Avenue Stafford to Effren 15,000 9. Highland Avenue Hermosa to Haven 35,000 10. Beryl Avenue @ Foothill Freeway right of way 15,000 11. Hillside Road Beryl to Hellman 12,000 12. Church Street Cen_er to Haven @ Church Street Basin 40,000 13. Beryl Avenue Lemon to 51- north 35,OG0 14 Hermosa Avenue 300' south to Mignonette 10,000 15 Eighth Street Orange to Merin 20,000 16 Hillside Road Amethyst to Archibald 16,000 • 17. Turner Avenue 700' south to Baseline 35,000 18. Hermoan Avenue North of Banyan - Realign 6 Widen 50.000 TOTAL 9 483,000 Eligible for FAU Funding RECCV4FNDE0 MAJOR PROJECT PRIORITY STREET LIMITS ESTIMATED COST * 1. Grove Avenue 8th Street to Foothill $ 540,000 Widening signal modifications * 2. Vineyard Avenue Arrow Route to City Limit 300,000 3. Hellman Avenue San Bernardino Road to Church Street 75,000 4. 19th Street Carnelian to Haven 1,500,000 Various widening to 4 lanes drainage improvement SPECIFIC PLAN 30,000 + 5 Hellman Avenue @ Foothill Boulevard 300,000 Widening A drainage 6. Baseline @ Hermosa 350,000 Widening 6 drainage * 7. Baseline Hermosa to Haven 70,000 Widening B. Turner Avenue @ Foothill Boulevard 300,000 Widening 6 drainage s 9 Hellman Avenue Baseline to SPRR 250,000 Widening 6 drainage 10. Ramona Avenue @ SP'1R 150,000 Widening 6 drainage 11 Hermosa Av_uuc @ SPRR 150,000 Widening 6 drainage 12. Hellman Avenue @ AT 6 SPRR 150,000 Widening 6 drainage 13. Turner Avenue @ AT 6 SPRR 6 8th Street 175,000 14. Hellman Avenue Baseline to 19th Street 200,000 Widening 15. Amethyst Street Baseline to 19th Street 100,000 Widening 16. Hermosa Avenue South of Bristol 75,000 Widening d drainage U. Archibald Avenue 19th Street to Highland 100,000 Realign * Eligible for FAH Funding TOTAi 5 4.275.nf10 RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRIORITY e - estimated a Eligible for PAU Funding as Higher costa due to necessary roafiwrk �2. ESTIMATED .aA CURRENT TOTAL VOLUME MINOR LED ACCS COST a 1. Archibald end Church 16000 1400 3 8 60,000 a 2. Baseline and Mailman 12000a 40DOe 0 60,000 a 3. Archibald and Fourth 38900 4600 0 60,000 a 4. Haven and Amber 11400 6800 1 60,000 a S. Foothill and Hellman 15100 7900 3 360,000 6. Sapphire and 19th 13100 4400 0 50,000 a 7. Modify Crove and Arroj 120 )06 5000e 5 Modify Grove and Ninth 110 0e 40000 6 see Modify Cruve and Son Bernardino Road 90'00 4000e 3 page three Central School and Archibald meets school pedestrian warrants 35,000 * B. Archibald and 19th Street 7800e 2400e 0 60000 Vineyard and Arrow 9800 3600 2 75,000 * 9. Baseline and Eeryl 12000e 3000e 1 50,000 • 10. Carnelian aid Son Bernardino Road 12400 1600 2 60,000 a 11 Foothill and Turner 11600 2000 0 300,000 a 12. Crove and 8th 12000 2000 0 80,000 a 13. Foothill and Red Hill. Country Club Drive 16800 1400 0 60,000 e - estimated a Eligible for PAU Funding as Higher costa due to necessary roafiwrk �2. ,?;F :� ^Vyy sr•'t .> ,tip' , "r- _.•- ._'d'yL AGENCY Upland Chino Chino CALTRANS Montclair San Bernardino County San Bernardino County San Bernardino County Rancho Cucamonga Ontario Ontario /Rancho Cucamonga • REGIONAL PROJECTS PAU DISCRETIONARY PROJECT HOMINATIONS ESTIMATED PROJECT LIMITS COST 250,000 16th Street Between Campus 6 6,540 (Baseline Road) feet east 580,000 R- verside Drive Benson Avenue to eastern city limits 320,000 Schaefer Avenue Ramona Avenue to East End Avenue 1,300,000 Euclid Avenue Plan Avenue to Merrill (Route 83) 517,356 San Bernardino Street Montclair Basin to Monte Vista Avenue 262,500 Pipeline Avenue State Highway 71 to Schaefer Avenue 317,300 Peyton Drive State Highway 142 to State Highway 71 261,400 PSpelina Avenue State Highway 142 to State Highway 71 500,000 Crove Avenue 8th Street to Foothill Route 66 321,000 Mission Boulevard San Antonio to Archibald Avenue 636,000 Vineyard Avenue Fourth Street to Arrow Highway 11 �� y�ii�'Y4,'d'�'''.i`al iIMM'ZI•'/l`.,.... n,) ",i^`+..,..,.n W,`1 +... N_'a.� "l+4';J'T'T -w.� 'r1'";. �•...."2.'�=."a \,7�",i7 Q�+l ay i.(�•,' �`.'i L:` 1 - CITY OF P,ANCMO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: January 10, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Sub3ect: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNING COMMISSIONERS INSTITUTE The annual League of California Cities Planning Commissioners Institute will be held February 21, 1979 through February 23, 1979 at the Del Monte Myatt Mouse in Monterey As you-are aware, the League's annual institute in the color conference for Planning Ctmmissioners in California. The insti- tute annually considers the state of ciry planning in California and in 1979 focuses upon city planning in the wake of Proposition 13. The Institute is widely acclaimed by those who attend it Our Planning Commission wan sent to this institute last year and found it very valuable to their professional development as Planning Commissioners. The current budget; however (perhaps by oversight), did rot include this Institute as a budgeted item; therefore, no funds have been specifically budgeted for the meting. The Planning Commissioners have requested atten- dance at this meeting; therefore, the City Council sho,•id be requested to consider approving attendance at this meeting by the Planning Commission and the Community Development Director with paymenr vhrough the contingency fund. Last year the Planning Commission was flown to .ne Institute; therefore, I would recommend that the same arrangement or Its equivalent if the Commissioners elected to drive be authorized. Approximate estim;e for attendance at the Institute is about $1,500 including registration, lodging, food and travel for six individuals. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JLt:m ten. t'S� /'f'.;t. >)r.!'tt '4�:'�n'1..�.';. •. ✓�"'.�_• \ +�`'Ltiar. ;.J `y^.r','f�s:�,`a�i: trrtir RPPr.lb,ro ),BOOK CITY Of RANCHO CUCAPAONCIA League of California Cities CQ6 "'UNITY OEYELOPiIEhI DEPT. !iiit JAN 1 u 1979 Wak iao« � 1979 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS INSTITUTL8191101111L1112i31915P6 Del Monte Hyatt House, Monterey Califorila 9 February 21 -23, 1979 TD: PLANNING COMMISSION OIAIRPM;ONS (for distribution to Commission Members) PIMNING DIRECIOILS CITY NIWGPRS AND CITY CLI'RIS IN NOtI-MINAGER CITIES the Lvague's Anutal I'lauunblp t:omnissioners Institute offers to commissioners and staff alike a very valuable opportunity to consider the state of city _ planning to the wake or Proposttion 13 and to "recharge" yourself for the challenges ahead This year's Planning Commissioners Institute will focus on the major issues facing city planning officials in the wake of Proposition 13 Institute topics will incltale: - analyzing the impacts of proposed projects - assuring an adequate howling stock intergovernmental relations - zoning issues and procedures - orientation for no' commissioners - the future or planning in cities A prclimhary program outline is incltaled on page 3 fits year's Institute is located in Mbnterey, at the Del Monte Ilyatt House, with the idea that this central state location will case the travel costs somewhat for the largest mmiher of officials. The program is also designed to provide maximm learning opportunities In the shortest amount of time. You are urged to register early for this institute and to got your room reserations in herone iehrtury 1 to assure th.tt sluice will he mailable for you Registration To facilitate the registration process, you Ora encouraged to register in advance and a pink registration fora is attached for this purpose. Should you wish to register in advance please complete the Advance Registration Form and return it with a cht-ek or coney order (please no purchase, orders) in the appropriate amount to the LEAGtiE OF CALIFORNIA CI-1 lls, 110TEL CIAREADUT, BEWELEY, CA 94705 To rROCESS Tile ) ADVANCE REGISTRATION, PAYM17rf OF TILE REGISTRATION PEE MUST ACCOMPANY TIIIS FORM V Y 1 Ian KSTMEI akCn,unUnOml, I001Et CIMF~ I1t Mfitywse, 9am1W YAU aVp w,lC ]y 1 41GE1 Ce,,v • 0161,,,!1911 Km-' -'-A, nlaru> �nl V. WA lu, ,j��o �tf,,t••.:= :.��pS,''Y.;f`'.. �:��.��� -�'• '.��Y Yi.J4 i.iM .1��+ -✓, � ,±.Wr•P w,..�.garl «..w*t V......q... w��., � ....._YCU. -i.� r j At the bottom of the Registration Form is a questionnaire for those who plan to attend the Institute but do not wish to register In advanco to order for the Loaguu to MAO apprnprlate arrangements for this meeting, it is necosaaty that we have an accurato estimate of the number of of ficlals who will bo attending if you expect to attend, Please fill out either the Advance Registration seettoo (return with payment) or the Attendance questionnaire section, and return the entire form to the Berkeley office of the League NOT LATLR TITAN PEMRUARY 7 1579. Registratlon facilities will be available at the Institute for those net registering in advance. Registration facilittes will open at 12100 noon, Wednesday, February 21 in the Main Lobby of the Dui Monte Myatt (louse Ilegistrattun ree Tile following registration fees will apply for the Planning Commissioners Institute, CITY OFFICIALS $50 00 NON -CITY PUBLIC OFFICIALS $60.00 NON- PUBLIC OFFICIALS $65 00 Tile registration fee is Inclusive of the programmed meal functions Ilotel Reservations The Dal Monte Myatt Mouse has agreed to house delegates and will provide meeting facilities for the neasions When making your hotel reservations, please use the white hotel reservation form attached which includes the room rates that will prevail during thr meeting If you are planning to share a room with another city official, only one form with both names Indicated on it should be sent In For those planning to check in later than 4100 p.m., either a deposit in the amount of the first night's rental or a commitment by your city, will be required to guarantee your accornadations. All reservations should be received by the Del Monte Hyatt House no later than February 1, 1979 Motel reservation forms should be returned directly to the Del Monte Ilyatt Ilouso at the address Indicated on the form lraibporlatloil The Dot Monto Hyatt Mouse is located at 1 Old Golf Course Road, at the Camino Agualito off ramp from Highway I htax,usino service in available from the airport to the hotel for tlnise flyinq into the Monterey Airport Monterey is served by United, PSA, Air California a,ul Ilughen Air Wcat -2- I t A December 20, 1978 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Heating CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was hold at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday. December 20, 1978. The meeting was called to order at 7:07 p.m. by Mayor James C. '-oat, who led in the pledge to the flag ROLL CALL Present: Council members Schlosser, Mikele, Palumbo, West, and Mnyor Frost City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Interim Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant to City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; and City Englncer, Lloyd Hubbs. APPROVAL OF Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by West to approve the MINUTES minutes of December 6, 1978 with the following corrections: Page 3 — Etiwanda Impaction Report — should read that Etiwanda Is encompassed by the Cha£foy Joint Union High School District, not a part of Page 6 — should read SCAO held public hearings, not the Board of Supervisors. Motion unanimously carried for approval of minutes as corrected. ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Congratuldtfons ware extended to Jack Lam on the arrlvol of a new son on Sunday, December 17. Weight was 8 pounds, 8 ounces. 2. Request to delete Stems 6p from the Coneenu:Calendar and Stem 8(1) from the Staff Reports. 3. Peggy Ziegler of the Daily Report will be leaving the assignment to assume a new assignment. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were presented on the Consent Calendar for approval: a. Approval of warrants in the amount of $224,986.90 b. Refer claim against the city by Joan and Volney Willett in the amunt of $25,000 to the City Attorney for handling. c. Request for Alcoholic Beverage License by China Carden Restaurant at 9770 19th Street for an on -sale beer and wine. d. To sat January 3, 1979 for public hearing on a zone change 78 -05 by the Southern California Lutheran Church e. To act January 3, 1979 for public hearing on a zone change 78 -06 by Hona /Corgen. f. To set January 3, 1979 as public hearing for the Land Doe, Circulation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. g. To set Jdnuary 3, 1979 as public hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Land Use,Circilation and Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. h. Tract 9587: Release cash staking deposit of X2,500 to Thompson Associates. 1. Tract 9432: Release of bonds to Chevron Crnstruction. Performance bond (sever) $32,000.00 Performance bond (water) $51,000.00 J. Tract 9366: Release of bonds to E.J.C. Construction Performance bond (sever) $11,000.00 Performance bond (water) $14,000.00 City Council Minutes December 20, 1978 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR k. Tract 9288: Release of bonds to C 9.F.. Development (continued) Performance bond (water) $12,000.00 Perfo.mance bond (sever) $ 8,000.00 1. Tract 9313: Release of bonds to Soccland Corp. Performance bond (eewot) $20,000.00 Perfortance bond (water) $43.000.00 m. Tract 9002: Release of bonds to San Niguel land Co. Performance bond (sewer) $66,000 00 Performance bond (water) $43,000.00 n. Tract 9295: Release of bonds to Socaland Corp. Performance, bond (sever) $23,000.03 Performance bonl (water) $32,000.00 o. Release bonds ro Crowell/leventhal. Per= ormance bond (water) $24,000.00 p. Deleted Stem. q. Tract 9352: Accept roads and release 'ponds to Inco Homes located at the southwest romer of 19th and Aermoca. Performance bond (road) $144,000.00 Performance bond (water) 53,000.00 Perfomance bond (sever) 37,000.00 r. Tract 9475: Accept roads located at the northeast corner of Haven and Lemon and release bond to J. Anthony Development. Performance bond (road) $ 82,000.00 s. Minor Subdivision No. 76 -0642: Release instrument of Credit and Agreenent in the amount of $6,000 from Douglas Nelson. Securities posted by Bank of America. t Plot Plan 96 -70: Release of Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the amount of $159000 to Stevens Foothill Rental. u Tract 9348: Release of cash staking devosit of $2,250.00 to Rent Land Co. I v. Request auchorication to attend League of California 1 Cities conference. (Labor Relations Institute) Funds had been budgeted for up to three members of the City Council to attend. Notion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schloaser to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion unanimously carried Mayor naked Council If the order of the agenda should be changed because of the large number of people present for the Growth Management issue. Consensus of Council was to keep with the printed order fcr the agenda. . ZONE CHANGE NO. Request for Zarin Change No, 78 -02. The change of zone from 78 -02 - Colombero C-2 and N -F, to N -2 for 9.3 acres of lend located on the northeast corner of Etivanda Avenue and Nhittram submitted Ordinance No. 48 by Secondu Colombero. Request rind been before Council on (second reading) December 6 and had been approved. Second reading for the Ordinance was before Council. Notion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No. 48 and valve entire reading. Title read by k':sserman Notion unanimously carried. ORDINANCE NO..48 r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF :NE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOXA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 229 - 151 -15 AND 16, AIM 229- 161 -01 THROU„H 07. City Council Minutes December 20, 1978 Page 3 ELECTRIC FRANCHISE An ordinance to establish an electric franchise dith Southern California Edison Company. Ordinance Ho. 42 (second n•ading) Motion: Moved by Jest, attended by Palombo to waive further reading of the ordinance Motion unanfaeusly carried. I 1 Motion: Moved by Heat, oeconded by Palombo to pees and adopt 11 Ordinanca No. 42. Motion carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palomho, Nest, Frost NOES: None ABSENT: None ORDINANCE NO. 42 (Title and Number read by Wasserman) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, 1:NCLUDINC COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN ALONG, CROSS, UPON OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 33. ZONE CHANGE 78-03 Change of zone from R -1 to A -P on 4 2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street submitted Seigl. Ordinance by Walt Seipl. Staff report presented by Jack Lam, No. 49 (first read) No comments were offered by either Council or public. Motion: Hexed by Palombo, reconded by Schlaoser to waive. entire reading and to pass on to second reading on January 36 1979. Title read by Wasserman. Notion unanimously carried. ORDINANCE NO. 49 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 202- 191-13 FROM R -1 TO A -P GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET END HERMOSA AVENUE. MOBILE HOME RENT Staff report prevented by Jim Robinson. He stated that at the REVIEW REPORT tlma the written report to Council was completed, staff had only two responses to the letters sent to park owners. It was the staff's recommendation that this be postponed until Council could meet with the owners sometime after the first of the year MSkels mentioned he had also volunteered to serve on the committee. ETIWANDA SCHOOL The Etiwanda School Board had submitted a Declaration of IMPACTION Impaction. However, the item had been delayed to determine whether the School District could be eligible to file the Res. No. 78 -69 impaction even though Impaction dnes not presently exist in Etiwanda Wasserman pointed out there was a orovision in Ordinance No 30 which specifies that any overcrowding which exists within eighteen months following occupancy of a proposed develooment and exceeds the capacity of a school, a Declaration of Impaction can be filed. I City Council Minutes December 20, 1978 Page 4 The Etivanda School District had a'ded Section 6 to the Impaction Declaration as follows: 6. Because of our ability to absorb a few students but no way to *house children from major houaina developments we imuld ask the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to invoke the intent of "Conditions of Overcrowding" as presented In Ordinance 30, section 3 (a). Another problem van in the distribution of the fees. Staff had asked the City Attorney to draft an agreement with the various school districts. Notion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to concur with the Etivnnda Impaction Declaration, approve Resolution No. 78 -69 and to waive entire reading. Title read by Wassarwn. Motion unarimausly carried. It was decided to put the agreement on the January 17 agenda RESOLUTION NO. 78 -69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONCURRING IN THE FINDINGS OF THE ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT CONDITIONS OF OVER- CROWDING EXIST IN SAID DISTRICT. REQUEST BY VANIR A request from Vanir Development to modify the "T" DEVELOPMENT standards on the property located on the northeast corner of 19th and Amethyst At the December 6 meeting 19th 6 Amethyst Vanir had proposed a list of uses for the above mentioned site. The City Council had refetred the list back to the Planning Commission for review. Vanir proposed a list of fifteen possible uses. However, the Planning Commission eliminated :ion" 1, 3, 6, and 15. The list of proposed - uses follova: ) . Bakery — no sit down 2. Rook atore 3. Dry goods store 4. Floribt or gift shop 5. Jewelry store 6. Specialty store 7. Photographic supplies store 8. Stationery store 9. Photographer 30. Shoe store and /or shoe repair shop 11. Tailor 12. Dance instruction studio 13. Barbershop and /or beauty parlor 14 Clothing or wearing apparel shop 15. Men's and /or vown's exercise studio or health The applicant was not happy with the decision to eliminate item No. 15, although ho concurred with the elimination of the others. Nelson Gentry, attorney representing Vanir, pointed out to the Council that the decision of the Planning Commission was not an unanimous vote to delete No. 15. Janet Cochrade, manager of Mary Ellens Figure Salon, spoke emphasing the light traffic slow in connection with this business. It was hoped to put in a Mary Ellens Figure Salon in this area. lio. ver, she needed 3000 square feet of the proposed 3600 square feet City Council. Minutes December 20, 1978 page 5 . Planning Commission Chairman, Norman Rempel van asked about the Comm£seion's intent. He said it was unanimous to delete No. 15 with the other Stems. Us said no one tas interested in adding the item back on the list. Motion: Moved by Schlosser and seconded by Pulombo to accept the recommendations of the Advisory Committee and the Planning Commission with t" approved list of uses for the bulldinC an thv property at the corner of 19t1 and Amethyst. Also, to limit to 502 of the utilization of the building structure to any une business. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, West Hay Sarin of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District emphasized the cost of establishing schools and the overcrowding conditions He said it costs $2.9 million to build a cstellite school — 80% of their budget went for salaries. Lifting of the moratorium would generate more students in the 109 11, and 12th grades. Ile opposed the lifting of the moratorium but supported the organization of a Fact Finding Camitteo. Sario said the School District could redistrict the schools, but chose not to since Alta Loma did not want their students going to other high schools. However, vast Chaffey schools would be 1dropping in attendance. Ontario High would be at its capacity in 1981, but Chaffey High and Montclair would b3 dropping. West felt the Committee should look at other areas in the Chaffey district to determine the number of homers under construction. NOES: Frost RECESS Mayor called a recess at B:15 p.m. The meetin;i regonvened at 8:20 p.m. with all councilmen present. INTERIM Jack Lam presented the staff report an the Interim Growth GROWTH Management strategy. He pointed out the Planning Camwiss£at MANAGEMENT had had several sessions with the BIA, School Lletrict Representatives, and builders to develop a solttton on'the impaction of schools and the backlog of approved tz�tativee Ile stressed chat tracts new under construction were aaproved by the County not the City It was the recommendation of the Planning Commission that the present moratorium on residential developme at be lifted January It 1979 and an Interim Growth Management be adopted Discussion followed over the plan. ' Since a lot cnf misinformation was being clrculaned, it was suggested a Pact Finding Committee be formed Itayoi opened the mating to the public. Mrs. Callarinl, president of the Jasper School Site Committee, presented the following questions: 1. How long must students stay an double seeuiois7 2. is there another way to fit.i money to build tchools7 3. Encouraged everyone to write state cepresentatives7 She then submitted signed petitions to the Counc:tl She supported the organization of a Fact Finding Comittee Hay Sarin of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District emphasized the cost of establishing schools and the overcrowding conditions He said it costs $2.9 million to build a cstellite school — 80% of their budget went for salaries. Lifting of the moratorium would generate more students in the 109 11, and 12th grades. Ile opposed the lifting of the moratorium but supported the organization of a Fact Finding Camitteo. Sario said the School District could redistrict the schools, but chose not to since Alta Loma did not want their students going to other high schools. However, vast Chaffey schools would be 1dropping in attendance. Ontario High would be at its capacity in 1981, but Chaffey High and Montclair would b3 dropping. West felt the Committee should look at other areas in the Chaffey district to determine the number of homers under construction. s City Council Minutes December 20, 1978 Page 6 Nancy Kettle from Alta Loma Elementary School Board spoke for the president Bob Frost. She supported the Idea of establishing a Fact Finding Committee and felt there should be a PTA or Site Council member on the committee as representative. She read a letter from the President, Bob Frost, sin a he could not be present. Ken Willir of the BIA concurred with the fact that a lot of misinformation was peing passed about. He felt there should be someone from the Chamber of Commerce and organized labor on such a committee He did feel there were too many representing the school districts on the committee although he would not oppose that now. Doug Hone. He said it was December 20, 1976 when the last tentative tract was epproved by the County. Curt Bonneville from thr Chaffey Joint High School Board of Trustees asked for clarification on the proposed Interim Growth Hanagement plan. he was in favor " "of establishing a Fact Finding Committee Others addressing the Council were: John Larago felt the committee should not be so heavily represented by the schools. Ron Pet -way felt there should be some way to notify people with parcels when there are meetings Larry Bliss was against schools being no heavily re- presented-on the Committee Ralph Levis suggested someone should Investigate the need for housing within the comaunity. There was a lot of commercial within the area; employees would want to live within the community in which they worked. 7amellia Wright from Central School District. Suggested that facts be sought from all school districts since several were experiencing overcrowding. West suggested that superintendents be =do ex- officio members of the committee Jim Smirl of Vanguard felt the committee should investigate the number of tontatives unite He felt the Planning Commissions recommodations were acceptable. Mayor closed the public session. Council decided the Fact Finding Committee be comprised of the following: 3 members - from the Advisory Committee (one member to represent each co ®unity.) 1 member - representing the Alta Loma Elementary School Board 1 member - representing the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. City Council Minutes Detr.�ber 20, 1978 ?ag+ 7 1 member - representing the Alta Lome Junin; High 1 member - representing the Chamber of Coerce, 1 xober - representing organized labor 1 member - representing the PIA 1 v.vrber - representing the Central School District Ex- officio members would be auperintenoents of all school districts and member of the city staff. Motion: Moved by Hikals, seconded by Schlosser to approve the formation of a Pact Finding Committee comprised of the above representatives. Motion unanimously carrle. Council decided the following fr,cts should be determined by the Pact Finding Committee: 1. Review and verify the information submitted to the Planning Commission and Council regarding the number of single residential units Involved In the proposed growth management plan. 2. Verify attendance data submitted by the school districts. 3. Evaluate the fiscal and economic Impact the proposed growth management plan may have up" the city, school district, and the community �i 4. Determine the actual amount of time double sessions will be required because of a lack of clos.rooms. 5 Determine the actual number of homes under construction in other areas within the boundaries of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. 6. Determine whether there is need for additional housing within our community 7. Determine the Impact the proposed growth mnagemanL plan my have on our schools. Since the growth management plan provides for phased development, it should be relatively simple to predict on a month -by -month basis the actual Impact further development may have on our schools. 8. Determine the actual number of homes under construction in each school district within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels that the above list be Included in the findings of the Pact Finding Committee and to report back to the council at the February 21, 1979 meeting. Motion unanimously carried. Council decided that Schlosser and Mikols get with Ken Willie to daterm Lne who would represent organized labor on the Committee. Motion: Moved by West. seconded by Palombo to extend the building moratorium for sixty days to expire on March 9, 1979. Discuesion followed over whether to establish the moratorium for only the Alta Loma School District. Mikels suggested the Council recess to go over the proposed ordinance. City Council Minutes December 2C, 1978 Page 8 RECESS Mayor called a recess at 11:00 p.m. Meeting re- convened at 11:15 p.m. with all members of tha Council present. Council discussed the propos -d Ordinance No. 50 which would extend the moratorium established under Ordin- once No. 36. West withdrew hie original motion. , Discussion continued an to whether to erempt all malti- family dwellings to include both apartments and condominiums. Mikels made a motion to delete the word apartments to read .. "multiple- family medium and high density developments..." For lack of a second, the motion died. Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adopt Ordinance No. 50 with the following changes: "exempting multiple family medium and high density apartment developments, and to Include residential development on lots created by parcel maps presently on file." Wasserman read tho ordinance In full with the changes made in title and Section 2. Notion unanimously carried. ORDINANCE NO. 50 AN ORDINANCE DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE L'CTY -OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ErIEUDING THE ERPIRATTON DATE OF THE MORATORIUM IMP0!ZD BY ORDINANCE N0. `6, MCEMPTTING MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLISGS THEREFROM, AM) DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. ROAD MAINTENANCE According to our present agreement with the County for CONTRACT road maintenancr, we would notify the County and define our street vIntenance requireme� is prior to Jantory 1 of each year. This is simply a renewal of an apattment which we already have with the County. Hikels raised the question regarding liabiliq Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikela to hose the City Attorney draft the necessary changes in the hold - harmless clauses of the contract and to notify the County of our Intent to continue services. Motu unanimously carried. RECONSTRUCTION The request for adoption of a Resolution was in accord - OP BASV INE ance with State law which would designate Baseline as a County maintained road for the duration of the con- struction project involving the widening of Baseline farm Archibald to Hellman. It was scheduled to advertise in January and be under construction the latter part a. April. Notion: !loved by West, seconded by Palombo to approve Reaolution No. 78-74 and waive entire reading. Title read by Wasserman. Notion unanimously carried. a� City Council Niautes December 20, 1978 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 78 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 1D RECONSTRUCT BASELINE STREET FROM ARCHIBALD TO HALIHAN AVENUE. STATE LITTER Mr. Holley presented staff report. lie briefly explained CONTROL CRAMF there were two parts of the grant which were available and we would qualify. They were grants for litter control and litter law enforcement. The funds could be used in paying the cost of trunsport of litter and posting anti- litter signs. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to Ppprove applylug for the State Litter Control Grant and to waive entire readtng. Wasserman read title. Motion unanimously carried. RESOLUTION No. 78 -72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE STATE LITTER CONTROL, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE RECOVERY FUND. REVISION OF Revisions to the Comprehensive Fee Resolution were pre - COMPREHENSIVE sented. Diacussion followed. Tt r ;a felt by the Council PEE RESOLUTION that more time was needed to go over the fees Consensus of the Council was to bring item back on the January 3, 1979 agenda. UPGRADING OF Mr. Enpey presented the staff report explaining the features COPY EOUIPHExT and cost of the IBM Copier III which we were considering. Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to approve the upgrading of copy equipment to the ISH Copier III. Motion unanimously carried. NATIONAL LW,'UE Reememeadation was to loin the National League of Cities OF CITIES at an approximate cost of $600 per year. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palumbo to approve the joining of the National League of Cities. RECORDS MANAGEMENT Recommendation to hire a consultant to help set up the city CONSULTANT files. Total cost — $1225. Nation: Moved by West, seconded by Schlosser to approve the hiring of a consultant at a coat of $1225 to set up city files. Notion unanimously , trried. ACCEPTANCH OF Minor Subdivision No. 78 -0194: Accept bonds by Mae Nall Lees. BONDS Performance Bond (road) $12,343.64 Labor and Materials Bond (road) $12,343.64 RESOLUTION NO. 78 -73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AA IMPRUILIMT SECURITY FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 78 -0194. notion: Moved by West, seconded by Mlkals to approve Resolution No. 78 -73 and waive entire readi•g. Wasserman read title. Notion unanimously carried. City Council Hinutea December 20, 1973 Page 10 ADDED ITEM Tract 9444 and 9445: Request for extension to September 15, 1979. Tract 9444 and 9445 Motion: Moved by Schlosser, aaconded by West to grant the extension of time. Motion unanimously carried. NEW BUSINESS 1. Status of Census — Hr. lbpey explained we were waiting for the maps which should be fiuished within the next f1 ...s. These maps have been approved by the State 3art 'y. 2. January 3 will be the public hearing on tl.e Coneral Plan. 3. Advisory Committee will be meeting at 6:DC E • prior to the City Council meting on January 3 Pt,tin topic will be the Capital Improvement Program • the Y.A.U. priority list. ADJOURPIDIMY lotion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adjourn. Motion unanimously carried. Meeting adjourned at 12143 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk January 3, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER_ The regular meeting of the City Council was held at the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, January 3, 1979. The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost, who led In the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL Present: Council members Schlosser, MSkels, Palombo, West, and Mayor Front City Manager, Lauren Wasserman: Interim City Attorney, Sam Crowe; Assistant to City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; and City - Engineer, Lloyd Rubbs APPROVAL OF The minutes of December 20, 1978 had not been completed. MINUTES ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Wasserman Introduced Don Newman, our new reporter from the Daily Report. 2 Norman Hempel, Chairman of the Planning Commission, returned an armoured vest and hard list to the Mayor since the Council would soon be opening public hearings on the General Plan. The vest had been presorted to him when the Commission opened public hearings for the General Plan. CONSENT CALENDAR The following items were presented as part of the Consent Calendar% a. Approval of warrants in the amount of $380,918.83. b. Authorization for Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, and Jim Robinson. Assistant to the City Manager, to attend 1979 City Managers Spring meeting An Monterey on February 7 -9 Funds have been budgeted for this con- ference. c. Denial of claim of Mr. and Mrs Janes Ransfer as recomm ended by County Counsel. d. Tract 9586: Release cash staking deposit to Thompson Associates — $2,600. e Tract 9432: Accept roads and reissue bonds to Chevron Construction Performance Bond (road; $162,000. f Tract 9401: Release of bonds to Olympus Parific Corp. Performance bond (saver — on site) $45,000.00 Performance bond (sever — off site) $22.000.00 Performance bond (water — on site) $70,000.00 Performance bond (water — off site) $49,000 00 g. Tract 9409: Release of bonds to Corol Investment, Inc. Performance bond (sever) $20,000.00 Performance bond (water) $35,000.00 h. Tract 9458: Release of bonds to Fred Schneider Performance bond (never) $20.000.00 Performance bond (water) $35,000 00 I. Tract 9484: Release of bonds to David W. Long Performance bond (water) $26,000.00 J. Tract 9602: Release of bonds to Matreyek News, Inc. Performance bond (never) 143,000.00 Performance bond (water) $44,000.00 City Council Minutes January 3, 1979 Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR (continued) :ONE CHANGE 78 -03 Ordinance No. 49 (second rend) Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to approve the Consent Calendar Notion unanimously carried. Change of zone from R -1 to A -P on 4 2 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Hermosa and 19th Street submitted by Walt Sc1gl. Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by West to approve the zone charge, adopt.Ordinance No. 499 and valve the entire reading. Wasserman read title of ordinance. Motion unanimously carried. ORDINANCE NO. 49 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL Nb. 202 - 191 -13 FROM R -1 to A -P GENER111Y LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER 02 19TH STREET AIM HERHOSA AVENUE. ZONE CHANGE 78 -05 Change of zone from R -1 ( ningle family residential) to A -P (administrative /pr6kssional) for 5.51 acres of Ordinance No 51 land located on the west aide of Haven Avenue, north (first read) of Lemon. Submitted by the Southern California Lutheran Church. Staff report pre:.cnted by Jack Ism. Purpose of the change, no the Lutheran Church could develop a church and facility. Planning Commission recommended approval of request. This is a request for zone change only, not for the project. Planing Commission will approve the project. - Motion: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve the zone change, waive entire reading of ordinance, and to peas on the January 15 meeting for adoption. Wasserman read title of ordinanre Motion unanimously carried. ORDINANCE NO. 51 AN CRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 201 - 261 -08 FROM R -1 TO A -P. ZONE CHANGE 78 -06 Change of zone from R -1 (single family residential) to A -P (administrative /professional) for 9.7 acres of land Ordinance No 52 located on the southwest coruer of Baseline and Hellman. (first read) Planning Department had recieved only one letter which was in favor of the zone change provided a fence were Installed. Tatter was from Virginia Ercek, 9180 Alder Avenue. Motion: Moved by Palabo, seconded by West to approve the zone change, waive entire reading of ordinance, and pass on to the January 15 meeting for final reading and adoption. Title read by Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried. F City Council Minutes January 3, 1979 Page 3 PUBLIC NEARING FOR Jack Ism presented the staff report. No emphasized there LAHI1 USE ELMENT - were nine mandated elements required. Council would be GENERAL PLAN discussing only three of those elements which were: land went circulation, and public facilities. State law given us thirty months to approve the other elements. C Planning Commission held the first official public hearing on September 15, 1978. There had been several other public meetings for input from the community prior to that date. Mr. Lam summarized the =Jot changes made by the Planning Commission from the printed Ceneral Plan which had been circulated throughout the city. These •vre: 1. Regarding the large portion which had been act aside as a "reserve area." Concern had been expressed regarding the area. Planning Commission recommended eliminating the term "reserve" designation and substitute the same with "study" area. Basically, the Planning Commission net up some standards for review for proJectn within those areas and standards for Sucher study. 2. Modified the areas that shoved the alternative regional .00pping centers. 3 Adopted study areas of the Chamber of Commerce Industrial Committee. FSome minor changes ware: L 1. Certain corners had been modified. 2 Changes around Chaffcy Coll -.ge from high to medium density. Mr. lam said the Planning Commission was recommending Interim Elements not the final elements. Reason for this was the other elements have not been developed yet. State law re- quires when they are developed that they all fit together in terms of policy and be consistent vith each other. Mikels asked for a visible presentatlon of the changes made on the map. Lam said he would have a mylar overlay made with the changes circled. Mayor opened the meeting to the public. Mr. Vito DeV1to Francesso, attorney in Ontario representing Jack Sylvester, a property owner northeast of Haven and Highland. Mr. Sylvester had seventy -five acres with a strip designated low density while the rest was designated mixed one. .Us wanted to have the whole area designated mixed use It was the feeling of the Planning Commission to use thin strip as a buffer area. Discussion followed. L Mikels asked the width of the strip. No one really knew. Lam said this could be obtained from the assessor's parcel maps. Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to concur with the Planning Commission's findings. Mikels desired to wait uctil the next meeting to find out the exact size of the strip In question. West concurred and withdrew his second. Palombo withdraw his motion. Motion: Moved by Mikels, ne ended by West to refer to the next ranting on January 15, 1979 to find out the dimensions of the property in question City Council Minutes January 3, 1979 Page 4 8th d 9th Streets Mr. :.aVito Prancesso spoke representing Nick DeVita, east of Grove Inc. and gill Skovgaard and the property between 0th and 9th Streets east of Grove. This Stem also had not been before the Planning Cummission. Area was designated low density on the General Plan and the r property owners would prefer a higher use designation for apartments. Hr. Lam suggested that the Planning Commission would be dlacussing the housing issue within the city. Perhaps this should be discussed then. Council agreed this should go to the Planning Commission as part of the housing Issue discussion. Foothill /Turner George Guidera spoke regarding property north of Foothill and Turner. His property is divided between mixed use designation and low density designations. This also. had not been before the Planning Commission. General consensus of the Council was to concur-conceptually'to extend designation further cast to Center'Street. Has referred to Planning Commission for review. Issue of higher density to the north should be included in the housing discussion by the Planning Commission. Windrow Designations J Alvin Husaer referred to the General Plan and the windrow designations. He spoke in opposition-to this designation. H d H Lumber Edward Fednew of H d H Wholesale Lumber. Property at 7205 Rochester Avenue, Etiwanda calls for low density (northeast of gasoline). Fednew spoke in opposition to the General Plan designation. He felt the low density designation was not appropriate and should have either a commercial or higher density designation which, he felt, would be a better buffer for a lumber yard. Discussion followed. This area could be declared a non - conforming use. He would be able to operate the business and sell the property, but could not expand. Lam told the Council that if this were allowed to con- tinue, there would be other similar requests. Notion: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Palombo to concur with the Planning Commission recommendationo to maintain the General Plan designation of low density residential making use a nonconforming use which will have to con- form to such nonconforming uses. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Hikele, Palombo, Frost I NOES: West City Council Minutes January 3, 1978 Page 5 Chamber of Commerce Jeff Sceranka of Lucas Land, spoke tepresenting the Chamber Industrial Com. of Commerce Industrial Committee. The Committee was con - earned with the terms "major" and "minor" impact, and desired to see them reclassified "Industrial." Notion: Moved by Nest, seconded by Palumbo to maintain the two designations of major and minor impact as approved by the Planning Commission. Motion unanimously carried Foothill /Center Steve Lucas, Lucas Land, spoke regarding property north of Foothill to Center. Council said they had referred this beck to the Planning Commission with the Cuidera request for the whole area to be reviewed. RECESS At 9:10 p.m. Mayor Frost called a recess The meting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. with all council members present Vanir Development Property located northwest of Archibald and 19th Street. Mayor explained to those in the group from Vanir that the Council was only interested in how and why Vanir felt their proposed project was appropriate Council was not interested in the clients. The subject property was designed high density on the General Plan Vanir wished to see the area designated commercial. They proposed a shopping center for that corner. They felt they could justify the proposed center and the location was right. Frank Domingoeraddressed the Council (from Vanir). He felt the Council _should hear the reports of some of the _ feasibility studies which were conducted by his clients in support of the project The following addressed the Council and presented statistical reports supporting the need for additional shopping areas in the city: Wayne Walters of Lucky Markets Tom Gray of Southwest Savings and Loan Douglas Nya, a local resident Speaking in behalf of maintaining the General Plan designations of high density were: Herman nompel, Chapman of Planning Commission John Vlasic, Advisory Committee member Motion: Moved by West to uphold the Planning Commission's recommendation to have only one shopping center per inter- section and to maintain the high density designation on the General Plan. Seconded by Palumbo Motion unanimously carried. Baseline / Archlbald Dr. ihlip Pope , part owner of property at Baseline and Archibald next to the Alpha Beta Shopping Center. Wanted to see the property designated commercial. This had not been before the Planning Commission City Council Minter January 3, 1979 Page 6 Lam said the Planning Commission had diceuased the whole corner although not just one specific piece of property. He said that the present shopping center was lacking parking apace, therefore, the additional parking needs would' have to be planned for in the undeveloped area. Discussion followed. Motion: Moved by Neat, seconded by Mikels to refer this back to the Planning Comission for a decision Motion unanimously carried. Lewis Rome Charles Dovekm spoke very br4efly for Lewis Home. Turnnr /Center Bill Esponnoza spoke regarding property between Turner and Center north of Foothill. Council toll him this area was included with the request that had been referred to the Planning Commission Foothill /Vineyard Gil Rodriquez, owner of property located at southeast corner of Foothill and Vineyard, spoke des.ring to see the General Plan designation of high density changed to. mixed use. Lam pointed out that the Planning Commission did not want Foothill to become a comaerical strip. Mra. Lane, Advisory Committee member, spoke against having any residential areas along Foothill. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Nest to concur with the Planning Commission decision to retain the General Plan designation of high density. Motion unanimously carried. Rochester /Foothill Steve AggazzotLi, owner of property southeast of Rochester and Foothill, said the property has a • commerclbl designation at the present time and would request to keep this designation. The General Plan has a major impact designation Council concurred In this area and referred this to the Planning Commission for review. No further Muests had been received by the Council to be heard for the evening. Public Hearing was closed and rescheduled. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to continue the discussion of the General Plan land use elements to the next meeting on Monday, January 15, and for formal decision on the Interim EIR elements, REVISION OF COM- Jack Lon presented a comparison fee schedule of the PREHENSIVE FEE titles within 15 mile red us of Rancho Cucamonga RESOLUTION Motion: Hove:: by Palombo seconded by Schlosser to approve the 1S'9 Unified Building Code, adopt Resolution No. 79 -1,. waive entire reading. Frost rend title. Motion unanimously carried. V City Council Minutes January 3, 1979 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 79.1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 78 -25 ESTABLISHING A COMPREHENSIVE FEE SCHEDULE. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT Location approximately Archibald and Baseline. Applicant PROJECT Ed Young, had left, but had requested Mr. Nubby to continue with the item. It we his recommendation to split the coats of improvements 1/5 — 1/5 — and 3/5. Thus, the city's share would be approximately $5,000. Discussion followed by Council as to whether the city should Incur this expense. Motign: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Hikeln to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to allow the Day Care Center, but with the applicant putting in the street Improvements. The Council denied the request of sharing costo. Motion unanimously carried. ANNEXATION Item was before Council to adopt a Resolution for the City of Ontario to proceed in the lead city position with the deannexation of three areas within the city limits of Rancho Cucamonga to the City of Ontario Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Hikels to approve the dcannexation of the three portions of the city to Ontario, approve Resolution No. 79 -2, and waive the entire reading. Motion unanimously carried. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AGREEING TO A MUNICIPAL RE- ORGANIZATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 35300 ET M TO INCLUDE DETAC@UNT OF PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED ON ATTACKED EXHIBIT "A" AND ANNEXATION OF SAME PROPERTIES TO THE CITY OF ONTARIO. RECESS Mayor called a recess at 12:40 a.m. Meeting reconvened at 12:45 a.m. with all members of the Council present. PAU PROJECTS An oral report was presented by Lloyd Hubby showing the status of the Federal Aid Urban (FAU) Project Selection. NEW BUSINESS None. AWL0UBSENT Motion: Moved by Hest, seconded by Palombo to adjourn to Monday, January 15, 1979. Motion unanimounly carried. Meeting adjourned at 12:43 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk