HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/02/21 - Agenda PacketJ
1. CALL TO ORDER.
2. PLEDGE TO FLAG.
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Re4uI,er Meeting
February 21, 1979 X
3. ROLL CALL: Mike s_, Palonbo_, Schlosser_, West_, Frost_
4. AF"ROVAL OF MINUTES:
S. ANNOUNCEMENTS,
6. COIISENT CALENCAR:
The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without _
discussion Any Council member, stall membor, or Interested party may re-
quest that an Item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion
a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $383,577.01 . ................. 1
b. Tract 9255: Release bond to John 0. Lusk 8 Son
Performance Bond (Road) SIOO,O0 .............. . 16
Trac. 6609: Release bond to Vanguard Builders, inc.
Labor d Material Bond (sewer) S 20,500
Labor A Material Bond (Water) $ 15,000
Labor d Material Bond (Road) S 35,000 .. ...... . .... 17
Tract 8892: Release bonds to Vanguard Builders, Inc.
Labor 6 Material Bond (Sewer) S 5,000
Labor 6 Material Bond ((Water) S 16,000
labor d Material Bond Road) S 42,000 .... ....... ... 18
Installation of Playground Equipment at Alta Loma and Lions Park ...... 18a
7 PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. An Ordinance which %•111 the the Cit authorlt to re wire........ .. 19
cat ono pu e r g is o way an t o construct on n
`sidewalks, curbsl guttersl street trees, adequate street lighting
and street paving to the centerline on all street frontages'
adJoining a lot on which a building or parkir.q lot is to be
constructed with the three exceptions noted.
Under current County Ordinances and City regulations, there
exists no authority to require these improvements for residential
construction where land division or zone changes are not
involved. Nranes are currently being built throughout the City
where street improvements have not been required. This condition
appears to residents involved in minor subdivision as a contradiction
in City policy and inconsistent.
City Council Agenda -2- February 21, 1979
ORDINANCE NO. 58 (Second Reading).,. „ ............... .... 19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENT FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF HAY IMPROVEMENTS IN
CONJUNCTION WITH BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
B. An Ordinance Ado tin the 1978 Edition of the National ...... ........ 21
E ectr ca Co e. --
Recoamendation: It is recomnended that Ordinance No. 59
be introduced for 1st reading and a public hearing date set
for March 21, 1979. Also to direct City Clerk to publish
a Notice of Public Nearing in the Daily Report two Lives --
one week apart.
ORDINANCE NO. 59 (first reading) .... . .... ................... .. 22
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY SOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1978 EDITION OF 111E
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND MAKING CERTAIN CHANGES
THEREIN NECESSARY TO MEET LOCAL CONDITIONS.
C Ordinances for the Establishment of Storm Drain and System
Development Fee.
The Cormnity Development Department is proposing for adoption
the establishment of a Storm Drain fee of $2,500 per acre to
be applied to land divisions and the issuance of building
permits and a System Development iee of one percent (1%)
on the building valuation to be assessed at the time of
development. These fees will be used for the exclusive
purpose of Planning, Engineering and constructing street and
storm drain facilities
ORDINANCE NO. 61 (First Reading) ... ... . ............ .... . . . 56
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
7 FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT
RESOLUTIONNO. 79- 10 .................. ............................... 58
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE
C/ •. / CUCAMONGA. CCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
ORDINANCE NO. 53 (Urgency) .. ...... ...... ................ ....... 59
AA CU'C ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN
��+ CONNECTION THEREWITH AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF.
City Council Agenda -3- February 21, 1979
ORDINANCEN0. 60 (First Reading ) ........................ ........ 62
C\
�AN ORDINANCE OF*THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
N CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
�y DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN
\� CON4ECTION THEREWITH. ,.7
D. Zone Change No. 87- Bllubmitted by Jerry Rodgers ..... .. . .......... 65
Changing the zone from FP -2 (Flood Plain) to A -P (Administrative -
Professional) for property located on the south side of Baseline,
775' west of Vineyard Avenue.
ORDINANCE NO. 62 (First Reading) .............. ........... ...... 67
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 207-
031-19 FROM FP -2 TO A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASELINE
APPROXIMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STRFET.
E. An Ordinance establishtn re ulations and licensing Procedures
or keeping Dogs as Pets w t n t e C tY.
ORDINANCE NO. 63 (First Reading) .. .. . ..... ........ .. .... 89
A.N ORDINANNCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA.
ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE
KEEPING, OF DOGS AS PETS WITHIN THE CITY.
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -11 ....... ... ..... ......... ........ ..... .. 93
7 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, A ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE
LICENSING OF DOGS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
8. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
A. Fact Finding Committee Report ......... .. ............... ... .......yM
B. Contract with John Blayney for industrial Area Specific .............. 109
an - y ac am
C Lewis Pa. .s - Appeal Planning Commission Decision, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 113
Mr. Lewis R. Parks has sent a letter to the City Council
indicating that when Zone Change No. 103 -67 was considered by
the Council he had not received notification of the change in
the date of the hearing from January 17 to January 15, 1979.
Mr. Parks has requested that the City Council consider setting
a new date for appeal of the Planning Commission decision
regarding Zone Change No.103 -67
The City Attorney has indicated that the City Council has two
options regarding this request. (1) Set the matter for a
public hearing and provide notification to home owners withing
the legally prescribed area. (2) Not set the public hearing
City Council Agenda -4- February 21, 1979
thus reaffirming the previous decision of the City Council
which was reached following a public, hearing which was hell on
January 15, 1979: If the City Council wishes to reschedule
the public hearing, it is suggested that the hearing be
scheduled for the March 7 City Council meeting.
D. Desi nation of Re resentative to Serve on Soil Frosion
W% Dust revent on 'ortmi ss on.
10 1978. the City of Rancho Cucamonga adapted Resolution
No. 78 -19 which allows the Agricultural Ctmmissioner's Office
to enforce County Ordinance /2069 within the city boundaries.
Section 62.018 of this ordinance provides for the selection
of a representative from the city to be a member of the Soil
Erosion and Dust Prevention Commission. This panel hears
appeals of any orders, requirements, etc., of the Agricultural
Commissioner in the enforcement of County Ordinance No. 2069.
The County Department of Agriculture has requested that the
City of Rancho Cucamonga select a representdtive to the So'1
Erosion and Dust Prevention Commission for a three year term
beginning July 1, 1979.
E. Resolution Approving Parcel Map No. 4788 .... ............. ......... 115
RESOLUTION NO. 79- TY ....... .............. ..... .......... ........ 116
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0E RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUriBER 4788
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 77- 0450).
F. Lions Park Community Service Center - by Bill Holley ............ .. 118
9. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS
10. NEW BUSINESS
a. Council
b. Audience
,11. ADJOURNMENT
i
t
i
:t
ORDINANCE NO. 58
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR
DEDICATION OF RIGHT -OF -NAY AND FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC
RIGHT -OF -NAY IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH BUILDING
CONSTRUCTION.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Lack of Improvements Hazardous.
The lack of full frontage improvements adjoining
a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or
parking lot is hereby found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians
and vehicular traffic and detrimental to the health, safety ar.d general
welfare of the residents of the City.
SECTION 2: Streets and Highways - Dedication Required.
No building or structure shall be erected,
enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for
parking purposes, and no building permit shall be issued therefor,
unless one -half (1/2) of the street, which is located on the same side
of the center line of the street as such tot, has dedicated right -of -way
for the full width of the lot along all street frontages so as to meet
the Master Plan and /or Standards for such street In addition to required
dedication for street purposes, additioral dedication for storm drain,
sewer, water or other utility purposes may also be required in connection
with building permits where such dedication is necessary to prevent the
flooding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to
required utilities.
SECTION 3: In the event construction of full frontage im-
provements s not mnediately required, any person required td dedicate
land by this section shall nuke an irrevocable offer to dedicate property,
executed by all parties having an interest in the property including
beneficiearies and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current
preliminary title report prepared by a title company approved by the
City Ei.gineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by
the City Attorney and the City Engineer, and shall continue in effect
until the City Council accepts or rejects such offer.
SECTION 4. Construction of Public Improvenents - Required
enera y.
Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing
or arranging for the construction of any parking lot or commercial,
residential or industrial building, or buildings, or building addition
of alteration,shall provide for the construction or installation to City
Standards, of sidew5lks, curbs, gutters, street trees, street lighting,
street paving to the center line of the street, and necessary drainage
structures unless such improvements already exist along all street
frontages adjoining the lot on which the building or parking lot is to
be constructed, enlarged or altered.
SECTION 5: Exceptions.
(a) A single - family residence where the square
foot area of such additions does not exceed fifty percent (50S) of the
area of the residential portior. of the buildings existing prior to
addition.
(b) A single - fdmily residence when the value
of the proposed alterations does not exceed fifty percent (50S) of the
value of the building being altered prior to its alteration.
(c) Construction of or additions to garages.
carports, storage buildings and similar non - residential buildings,
accessory to single - family residences where such construction or addition
does not exceed five hundred (500) square feet in area.
SECTIM L: Construction of Public Tmarovements - Pr! r uis-
te to Approval of the Building OfficiaR
Except as provided in Section S. the Building
Official shall deny issuance of a building permit, or deny approval for
Occupancy or deny final approval and acceptance for public utility
connections to any building or parking lot until required full frontage
improvements exist, or are constructed or their construction is guaranteed
by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the City in a sum
therovedby he City Engineer based upon one - and -une -half (1 -1/2) times
SECTION 7: Construction Agreement.
The construction guarantee agreement shall be
effective on the date of the deposit of cash and shall end upon the date
of completion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of all improvements
required to be made. Upon completion of the improvements and their
acceptance by the City, the cash deposit shall be returned to the owner.
The City is authorized, in the event of any default, to use any or all
of the deposit money to cause all of the required work to be done or
completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses therefore. Any
money remaining shall be refunded to the owner.
1.
SECTION 8: City Standards.
The City Engineer is authorized to establish
standards for the construction and installation of sidewalks, curbs,
gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving and storm drain
structures.
SECTION 9: No Encroachment Without Permit.
No building, structure or parking lot shall be
erected, enlarged or altered if it does, or would, encroach upon any
public easement or right -of -way unless an encroachment permit is first
obtained from the City Engineer. The City Engineer may grant an encroachment
permit if he determines that the encroadhment will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare.
SECTION 10: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk siialiattest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the
same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at
least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, _
published in t�C ty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City
of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of
1979. ,
AYES:
NOES.
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City C er
Mayor
I
p 1 ACREE?M1T
This Agreement for professional services, dated and effective February 22, 1979
Is a contract between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation of the
State of California. hereinafter referred to as "City ", and Jotm Blayney Acso-
elates, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Urban Planner ".
RECaTALS
A. The City desires to retutn technical slid professional services for the
preparation of a Specific Plan for the Industrial Areas as designated on
the Land Use Element of tht General Plan.
B. The City has approved the selection of Urban Planner to assume respon-
sibility for performance of the work described herein In accord with the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
C. Tht City has approved the uelection of DeLeuw, Gather and Company, Engi-
neers, and L.D. Ring, Engineers to assist Urban Planner in completion "•
this work.
T M?"ORE, CITY AND URBAN PLANNER AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
Urban Planner shall prepare, perform, and complete the following pro -
fesslonal services under Stage 1, which shall provide recoamendations
on a traffic circulation pattern (streets and rail), but will result In
completion of a Specific Plan. A separate Work Scope for Stago II will
Include tasks necessary for completion of the Specific Plan.
-1-
A. SCOPE OF WDP.R
1. Detailed Work Program
Prepare detailed work program and time schedule for Stage I after
existing data is reviewed, and further discussion with City and
spokespersons for owners /agents /occupants.
2. Priority Trafficvays Study
To accommodate current development pressures, priority will be given
to resolving alternatives for east -west trafficwaya through the Indus-
trial area vest of Devote Freeway with the objective of =king specific
recommandationa by March 15, before the Citywide traffic model will
be operational
3. Basic Data
A. Interview interested owners /agents /occupants.
B. Collect available geologic and soils data, locations and capa-
cities of utilities lines, rail trackage.
C. Collect data an existing and anticipated employment densities
as a basis for projecting traffic generation.
D. Prepare basic data map on existing V-500' County Surveyor's
base shoving 1.ud use, parcel boundaries, existing or adopted
street right of way lines (with dimenoiona), =jar utilities
locations and sizes, drainage ways, flood hazards, rail trackage
(non - reproducible).
E. Prepare working map showing development proposals approved, under
consideration, or public but not formally submitted (non - reproducible).
P. Prepare traffic model for entire City incorporating earlier work by
San Bernardino County to accomplish the core detailed circulation
plan for the Industrial area. The model will allw testing of
alternative land uses and development schedules, and also will be
capable of evaluating alternative roadway configurations such as
deletion of the Foothill Freeway or of a portion of a major arterial
such as Hilliken Avenue.
C. Review existing Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan and flood hazards
data and make recommendations thereto regarding its impact upon
circulation.
6. Sketch Plans for Trafficways and Rail Access Alternatives
A. Prepare alternative traffiways networks and rail trackage con-
' figurations for testing, Inc ding Foothill Freeway alternatives
r
I
-2-
and alternatives vest of the Devore Freeway, requested by o+ners/
developers. Asdign 10 -year and build -out residential, commercial
and Industrial development rates and densities in sufficient detail
to determine trip generation compatibility with drainage and flood
control requirements.
B. Test alternatives and evaluate feasibility of each. Traffic service,
scree of acquiring right of way, construction costa, potential for seg-
regating residential and industrial area traffic, and impacts on drain-
age and flood control mete will be evaluated, but cost estimates will
not be prepared.
5. General Plan Amendment
Based on comments received, prepare a single plan suitable for adoption
as an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan if the
City determines that amendment of the General Plan should precede com-
pletion of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
6. Environmental Assessment
Prepare an environmental assessment. It 1s anticipated that a negative
declaration (absence of major adverse impacts) can be Issued for a
General Plan amendment. If preparation of an environmental impact
report is required at completion of Stage I, the coat of this work shall
be negotiated separately if the maximum fee has been reached.
7. Publication
Urban Planner will publish 50 copies of an illustrated report describing
the studies, describing the recommended General Plan amendment, and
including the environmental assessment, provided that if Stage II of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan-has been authorized by May 1, 1979, publi-
cation of the circulation proposala will be combined with other elements
of the Specific Plan at the time they are completed. Such report shall
include all technical appendices.
B. MEETINGS
Urban Planner and /or project managers for subcontractors will attend up to four
public meetings, Including City Planning Coumission or City Council meetings
or public hearing and community meetings, provided that if the maximum fee
shall hsve been reached, attendance at meetings later than two months following
completion of the work or meetings in excess of four shall be charged at hourly
rates plus direct costs.
C. SUBCONTRACTORS
Urban Planner shall retain DeLeuv, Gather and Company to provide traffic engi-
neering and transportation planning services. Nacre Karve shall be Project
Manager for DeLew, Gather. Urban Planner shall retain L.D. King to provide
services relating to drainage end flood control. Bill Mann ah:ll be Project
Manger for L.D. King.
-1-
D. TIME SCHEDULE
All work except attendance at meetings will be completed within 90 days
following approval of this Agreement by the City Council, provided Urban
Planner receives direction for completion of a single circulation alterna-
tive within 15 days following submission of comparative evaluations of
alternative networks. The time schedule may be altered by mutual agree-
ment of City and Urban Planner.
E. PA`ffMNr
Urban Planner shall bill the City monthly Car work done and direct costa
incurred during the preceding month, and City shall pay within 30 days
of receipt of billing:
JOHN BLAYNEY ASSOCIATES
John Blayney, Partner
Robert W. Glover, Partner
Michael V. Dyett, Partner
Other professional Staff
DELEUW, CATRER AND COMPANY
Engineers: V
VI
(Ham Korve) VII
Support Staff
L.D. KING. ENGINEERS
Bill Mann, Project Manager
Engineers
Designer /Draf town
Support Staff
$55 per hour
15
n5
2.75 time payroll cost
Vxnge in $15 -$40
$33 per bout
39
45
14 -21
$47 per -hour
36 per ham
26-32 per hour
15 -20 par hour
Direct charges incurred in the petformance of services upecified by this
Agreement shall include purchase of mops and photographs, printing and
reproduction costs, travel and subsistence, long distance telephone,
delivery costs, and any fees, insurance, permits, and licenses applicable
to this Agreement only
Time spent traveling is not charged when a full day is worked on City of
Rancho Cucamonga projects. Secretarial services are Included In professional
hourly rates for John Blayney Associates.
The maximum fee to be paid by City for services by Urban Planner (including
the direct or indirect costs of any subcontractors of the Urban Flamer)
shall not exceed $40.000 except as provided under Section A 6 relating to
preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Section B relating to
meeting attendance.
-4-
TERMINATION
The City may terminate this Agreement by giving written notice thereof to
Urban Planner, provided that the City shall be obligated to pay Urban Planner
for all work performed and for all direct costs incurred prior to receipt of
notice of termination by the Urban Planner.
The City may authorize the commencement of work at any time, stating the
maximum funds available at that time for paymmt. Urban Planner shall
commence work and City a'nall not be liable for fees exceeding the authorized
wA mt. If cosm"cemant is authorized with less than the full maximum fee,
the time achedule shall be subject to adjustment by mutual agreement if
work subsequently is suspended as a result of budget limitaticn. If the
wori- ' terminated due to lack of funds, the Urban Flamer shall not be
rasp. able for completion of specific products but shall endeavor to bring
the work to a logical stopping point within the budget available.
C. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
The Urban Planner is an Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action employer
and agrees to comply with applicable requirements governing equal employment
opportunity.
U. INSPECTION
The City, in reference to any request for payment submitted by Urban Planner
for services under this Agreement, shall have the right to examine and audit
the records of the Urban Flamer to verify such payment.
I. AVaNORITT
Each of the Parties -to this Agreement represents• that the person signing on
behalf.-of such party has the authority to do so.
J RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES
It is understood that the contractual relationship of the Urban Planner
to the City is that of an independent contractor, and all persons working
for or under the direction of the Consultants are their agentes servants,
and employees, and not &Santa, servants, or employees of the City.
IN WITNESS wumEOP, the City and the Urban Flamer have executed this Agreement
as of the date set forth herein.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO=
Mayor
-5-
Date:
APPROVED AS SO FORM AND CONTENT:
City Attorney
ATTEST:
City
Presidmts John Hlnyney Associates
-6-
i
ai
C c. i7lk
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Counnot!�
608 Ent a68 SOW • San CA 92418 • (7 1/1 383-1318 ROGER , BIRDSALL
cq�o�
GENEM HARPER
Ch41"Gwtcam, .
v�
February S. 1979 Cr n (Ck
11y Manager ll
C ty-o.£ Rancho Cucamonga
P. 0. Bo
Rancho Cucamo CA 91730
Dfs1r.M 4so P"W41r1e%
low...rSri�r,
In 1978, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted &n176 -19
which allows the Agricultural Connissioner's Ofcice to enforce
County Ordinance 42069 within the city boNndaries. Section
62 018 of this ordinance provides for the selection of a repre-
sentative from the city to be a member of the Soil Erosion and
Oust Prevention Commission. This panel hears appeals of any
orders, requirements, etc., of the Agricultural Commissioner
In the enforcement o�f County Ordinance 42069.
He4ro.requet4n9 that t e City of Rancho Cucamonga seleLt a
representative to the Soil Erosion and Dust Prevention Commission
for a three year term beginning July 1, 1979.
L. Birdsall
John KwocR C � � �,� �
per
Biologist CITt Lf F66C69Cb " %wtvW'
hLL,IN151. °.. TiGll
RLB /JK:ab G 1979
a�
PIA
q tgt911:tlli1211121't14151G
4
«•L Cam•. 1!,, -79-
- L:-atf ' -r. Cr, r Q,
A 1d.CL•n.'4 t. I r !y
nX
RESOLUTION "A"
WHEREAS, the Cali£or.tia Legislature has requested the Departmont
of Insurance study the subject of territorial rating systoms used
by automobile insurers; and
WHEREAS, territorial rating is a method of differentiating automobile
insurance rates on the basis of claims loss costs, which differ
from area -to -area; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has acted in recent years
to defeat legislation which would abolish territorial rating and
require a singlo rate be used by automobile insurers throughout
the state; and
WHEREAS, a statewide average automobile insurance rate would
not reduce the overall cost of insurance to the public, but would
merely effect a reallocation of existing costs among various
geographic areas; and
WHEREAS, throughout California, imposition of an average rate would
increase premiums for two - thirds of California's motorists; and
WHEREAS, the residents of this city (the City of Rancho Cucamonga)
would be burdened with increased premiums as a result of abolishing
territorial rating; by some insurance industry estimates, said
increase to approximate 35 percent for a typical insured motorist
t
�
in this area; and
1
t
0
" WHEREAS, The Department of Insurance has invited participation
in the study by cities and counties on behalf of their affected
i residents;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga horeby urges the Commissioner of Insurance to
maintain, and recommend to the Legislature maintenance of, an
equitacle system of territorial rating by which lose costs of
automobile insurers are allocated to those areas in which persons
causing such loeses reside; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that -the City Clerk forward a copy of
this resolution to the Commissioner of Insurance for inclusion in
'rr the hearing record ([.ad to Assemblyman William He Vittie��`i
Senator Ruben Ayala,
I
,. ATTEST:
r
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -12
A RESOLUTIOA OF nm CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFURNIA, RECOMMENDING THE MAINTENANCE OF
AN EQUITABLE SYSTEM OF TERRITORIAL INSURANCE RATING.
WHEREAS, the Calfiornia Legislature has requested the *apartment
of Insurance study the sub_act of territorial rating systems used by
automobile insurers; and
WHEREAS, territor :al rating Is a method of differentiating
automobile insurance rates a.% tho basis of claims lose coats, which diffur
It= area- to-area; and
WHEREAS, the Callforn.% Legislature has acted In recent years
to defeat legislation which would abolish territorial rating and require
a single rate be used by automobile insurers throughout the state; and
WHEREAS, .. statewide average automobile insurance rate would
not reduce the overall cost of insurance to the public, bnt would merely
effect a reallocation of existing costa among various geographic area&; and -
WHEREAS, the residents of this city, the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
would be burdened with increased premiums as a result of abolishing territorial
rating; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Insurance has invited participation in
the study by cities and counties on behalf of their affected residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby urges the Commissioner of Insurance to maintain,
and recommend to the Legislature maintenance of, an equitable system of
territorial rating by which loss costa of automobile Insurers nra allocated to
those areas In which persons causing such louses reside; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clark forward a copy of
this resolution to the Commissioner of Insurance for Inclusion in the
hearing record, and to Assemblymen W1111am McVittie and Terry Coggin, and
Senator Ruben Ayala.
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1919.
City Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -12
A RES0LUTI04 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUUMONNGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMENDING THE MAINTENANCE OF
AN EQUITABLE SYSTEM OF TERRITORIAL INSURANCE RATING.
WHEREAS, the Calflornia Legislature has requested the Department
of Insurance study the subject of territorial rating systems used by
automobile insurers; and
WHEREAS, territorial rating Is a method of differentiating
Automobile Insurance rates on the basis of Claims logs costs, which differ
from area- to-area; and
WHEREAS, the California Legislature has acted in recent years
to defeat legislation which would abolish territorial rating and require
a single rate be used by automobile insurers throughout the state; and
WHEREAS, a statewide average automobile insurance rate would
not reduce the overall coat of insurance to the public, but would merely
effect a reallocation of eaistipg costs among varicus geographic areas; and-
WHEREAS, the residents of this city. the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
would be burdened with increased premiums as a result of abolishing territorial
rating; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Insurance has Invited participation In
the study by titles and counties on behalf of their affected residents;
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga hereby urges the Cameisslooer of Insurance to maintaln,
and recommend to the Legislaturo maintenance of, an equitable system of
territorial rating by which loss costs of automobile insurers are allocated to
those areas to which persons causing such losses reside; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk forward a copy of
this resolution to the Commissioner of Insurance for Inclusion in the
hearing record, and to Assemblymen William HeVittle and Terry Coggin, and
Senator Ruben Ayala.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979.
Mayor
ATTEST:
i
L City Clerk
i�
'r
Q
<1
Z J A
K J p1
Y -
� m
Y
n
S
Y C Y
Q2 u G'
6 N j
6
4 U m
O W W
L' 4
u
•
r7
m
z
i
i
O
O
N
6
N
N
/1
Of
In
C
W
6
N
N
—
T
1.1
•
r7
m
z
i
i
C
O
N
6
O
�
6
Q
W
W
d'
Y
J
Qi J
W
m
YO\
^
=
Y
N
m m
J
O
O O
N
O
J
Y
J 6
W
r
u V
6'J
m
O J
J
Q
u y
•
r7
m
z
i
i
•
C
O
�
oI
O
O
O
O
_
N
O
I1
O
J
Y.
b
O
Y
V
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
C
W
U
m
�
O
.O
O
01
00-
Oln
m
O
N
In
4
N
^
O
O
^
NN^
W
C
1I.
In
m
n
O
N
-
�
N
yu
C
�
N
�
`
q C
N
q
q
O
I
gEIC
C
O
C
o
C
u
Y
t`j
m
n
Y
C
Y>
I
O
I
1
Y
C
O
W
_O
`
Y
c
Y
V U
y
V
N
LL
L
C C
T
C
C q
10
^
u V
N
n
U
N
W
7 m
O
O
u
u
V
OON
N
V
q
N
q
n
L
U m>
2 W l
O
J
1-•
m
/••
V
1
f q
u
U
•`
L
Cq
3
W
N
N
LL O O
Q
O W Y
1' 4
HI
S
N
01
N
O
2
In
I
N
T
N
.O
M
U
�
L
^
1
I
y
4
C
N
•�
yf
un
j
O
O
O
O
O
O
•
C
O
�
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
Ol
O
m
O
b
mm
6
m
�
O
.O
O
01
00-
Oln
m
O
N
In
4
N
O
NN^
W
N
N
-
�
yu
C
`
q C
u
q
q
ti
v
T
T
N
C
Y>
Y Y
N
O
O
O
W
O
N
V U
N
LL
L
C C
T
C
C q
10
^
u V
N
Z
U
N
W
V
O
O
u
V
q
N
N
-
q
V
u
U
•`
C
Cq
3
W
N
N
Q
Y
o O
L
L
Y
i
C
l
l L
� O
U
�
L
Y
Y
y
4
N
a
•�
yf
un
j
0^
Q^
••
00
u
U
n
.0
q'
�
1
V
6'
tl
Y
Y q
O
tY.
C
C
pN
u
'
n
q
C
L
`
Y
U
� W
n
6
F'
f•
�
O
O
�
q
L
} •�'
S
U
y
F
q•
m
m 0
m
Q
O
O
E
r r_• _
N
NN
N
N
O
O
O1
�
1
1
O
O
O
N
O
S
00
O
O
00
O
O
O
6
Y
O
W
N
yu
`
q C
u
q
q
ti
v
T
T
N
Y>
O
O
O
O
W
N
E
E
U
C
O
O
u
V
q
N
V
L
V
u
U
•`
C
Cq
3
C
u
N
Q
O
S
L
Y
i
C
l
l L
� O
U
�
L
Y
Y
y
4
N
a
O
••
j
L
.0
q'
q
V
6'
tl
Y
Y q
O
tY.
C
C
pN
u
'
•
O
L
`
Y
U
� W
n
V
O
O
.L
.L
O
�
q
L
} •�'
S
U
y
F
q•
m
_
O
E
r r_• _
_ l L
L � A
Y J J
u 01 YI
A Y Y
N � y
O C C C
6 A A A
N
O LL LL LL
N O
N
1 1
O W W b
U
U _ _
Q O O O
� C�J
O E
O
Z N
W A
J• W
R
E u
u N
N y v
� y C
u u _
C V�_O\OS Nm
_ ` Y 7 �Y tD S �
.Y\
O E 1 1 1 1 A A.
L J L
mmmaV z! VI JWw
n
L m
_mm
N N A N N N N
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O O O 00 00
A
C
O
o u
u
W
E Y O
O V
H u c
Y L
Y - C n
3] 6 Y
J C
K y
N l C
Y O
A Z L C
W
•
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
Y
O
O
N
N
T U
N
N N
NNf�
C
C
O
1� W
C
1 1 \
\ S
b
N �
O
tV
Q\
N
N U
6
m
tMV
u N N N
C \ \ \
V\
N
!D
�
OV1NryN
N
N
J
0 V
M
01
M
O
NnV1 V\V\M�V��..rr��
N
tO N�
Y
C
C
6
N0O\
tDC
n G {{
O � 4
V
Y
CN —N
_ l L
L � A
Y J J
u 01 YI
A Y Y
N � y
O C C C
6 A A A
N
O LL LL LL
N O
N
1 1
O W W b
U
U _ _
Q O O O
� C�J
O E
O
Z N
W A
J• W
R
E u
u N
N y v
� y C
u u _
C V�_O\OS Nm
_ ` Y 7 �Y tD S �
.Y\
O E 1 1 1 1 A A.
L J L
mmmaV z! VI JWw
n
L m
_mm
N N A N N N N
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O O O 00 00
A
C
O
o u
u
W
E Y O
O V
H u c
Y L
Y - C n
3] 6 Y
J C
K y
N l C
Y O
A Z L C
W
O\!n
n n
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
N N
NNf�
C
1 1 \
b
N �
O
tV
Q\
N
6
m
tMV
u N N N
C \ \ \
V\
N
!D
�
OV1NryN
N
J
0 V
M
O\!n
n n
N M
N
N
N N
NNf�
C
1 1 \
Y
6
u
u N N N
C \ \ \
J
=
u u u u
_
Y
C
C
6
N0O\
tDC
G'
V
Y
CN —N
N N N
W
W
YI
y t l_
Y
n n n 6
C
>
>
V Y
V
6
y
N N N
H
F•
S I? IT Y
m
VVV�
ttf
N
N
M
_mp7O
O
M
N
N
N
-NNVI
N
=NNN
100
O
O
O
O
00_O\
O
0 0 0 0
O
O
O
O
O O O O
O
W
O
Y
V
C
C
i
w
�
A
A
C
N
Z
O A
n
t
V
O
•
v
�
_
N
N
9
{D
C
n
O
N
J
_m 3..
1
o
O
u
0
Y
^
u
u
O
L
N
U
N
N
V
L
Y
C
Y
V
V
Y
Y
W
A
q
C
C
O
O
W
O
^U
>
L
W
LL
Z
C
C�
O
u
?
C
_
V V
0 m
W
W
Y
]
A
v
co
AW
O
1�
00000
W
O
000
S
m
b
N
b
N
0
0
0
0
OOpOb
u
o
V
u
V N
U
W
Y
0
c
q
.20
q C
0
O
O
U
U
u
N
u
O
q
N Y!
]/
O
`O
4 c
V
y
m
O
9 u
Y �_
C
C
O
N
4
l
Q
V
q
N
L
c
L
�
�po
N
O
U
O
N
qUq
t
q
q
V
O\
J
J
2
Z
2
CL
6
LR
C
¢
OC S
n
\
n
T
^
N T
L
1
�
O
m
N N
y
Y
Jp
N
O
1
1
O
S
C
]
U
O
L
\
c
L
0
q
V
\
OI
q
c
c
q
p
2
O
q
c
a
e
u
-
u
c
22
2
O
Q
c
O
E
O L
6
6
C
CI
U
J
O
L
n
Y_tY C
p
6
=
c
W
W
%
J
u
N
W
Y Y y p
6
_
N
L
N
N
q
`-
_d
L
^
^
W
u
V
Y
V VU W
d'
Y
Y
U�
�
q
q
L
u
m
c c=
N
E
O
D
c C
D!
6
q
N
N
�
T
q
6
O
S
6
6
Q
N V
f
f
V
N
J
Q
tD
pC
6
f
6 66 U
b
T
T T T T
b
b 0
N
N
T
O
N
�
N
V
V
1
Q
1
^
^
^
Q
O
O
0000
O
00
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
^
O O
1
o
u
u
0
Y
^
u
u
O
L
N
U
N
N
V
L
Y
C
Y
V
V
Y
Y
W
A
q
C
C
O
O
^U
>
L
W
LL
U
C
C�
O
u
?
C
0 m
W
W
Y
]
A
N
co
AW
`
W
N
V
v
N
L
C
V
V
u
o
V
u
V N
U
W
Y
0
N
q
.20
q C
0
O
O
U
U
u
N
u
O
q
N Y!
O
`O
y
O
O
9 u
Y �_
C
C
O/
4
l
Q
V
q
L
L
c
L
�po
C]
O
U
O
q
qUq
t
q
q
V
^m
J
J
2
Z
2
CL
6
LR
C
¢
OC S
L
j
0
Ol
!r
C
�T
• •
O
C
O
MmG \00
O\N VSM
_T O
1� Y
O
Y C
W
U
S
o
V\
0
10
0
N
0
V\
0
N
o
In
c
In
o
N� M M
I�I��O4
n b MS
OO6.CS
V
N
n
O
n
S
N
Q
6
m
F
J
m
J
F-
10-
�j
C
O
MmG \00
O\N VSM
_T O
1� Y
O
1 1
N� M M
I�I��O4
n b MS
OO6.CS
v\v\U\OS
G
N
�
O
lb r06N
S
N
1 1 1
O O O N O
SE.
S
O
MMMY\
0000
N
q
9
N
n
6
C
C
N
n
O
n
S
N
Q
6
m
F
J
m
J
F-
10-
�j
1�0\OCN
1 1
N� M M
I�I��O4
n b MS
OO6.CS
v\v\U\OS
G
lb r06N
1 1 1
O O O N O
SE.
O
MMMY\
0000
N
q
9
6
C
C
N N N N N
W
>
Y
O U
C O O T^
O
p
Y
u
u
n
u
4
(C
NN
SSSSS
-p
n
N
N
Y
a
c c c v c
W
a
n
_
0
N
Q
C
O Yf
tD mtD>
q
W
Y
l
l
�
Y
N
Y
N
OQ)N.1O
COO��
Y
C
6
N
j
C
6
W
7
J
SS V\S
MMMN�
O
O
0
MMI�M
O\O\O\1�0\
U
u
m
w
1
u
\O
Q\
M
x
C
V\
V\
N
Y\
S
V
Q
O
O
O O
V O
O
O
O
v
_
O
_
O
N
C
t
C
l
Y
>
O
u
O
u
G
O
V
$
G
Y
V
N
Y
1)
q
u
Y
O
N
�
u
Q
o
o
W
In
w
w
N
Y
Y
e
o
0
u
UO
o
=
u
Y
o
u
o
m
J
q
u
`
el'yrv•
n
N
n
O
n
S
N
Q
6
m
F
J
m
J
F-
10-
�j
Z n ti t+ n n n cO m 6 m G OJ G S D7 ^ n n n
U ry N N N N N N N N N
IJ
ll ,
C O O O O 7 O N S N S N Ol � OO�O O S N
L)I (1 G N O N N M
G o ^ S
^ m
1
u j V C C Y YY. 6 O YY. \ p N C
O Oi O
r K = lOJ U
V N Y N N U 6
O
2 Q\N F• � t � OI Ot Y u u U O O
C
m
2 l 6
Q q 6
V V S O O O O O O O O O O O O O n r O O O
C
E
u e
u c
m N
C T
C V
a 3 0 9
9 V W N LL V O O
C U Y u
Y N L O W L C
J 01
L Y C J Y > >
O ^ q C N �. Y U V Y U
Y L C O O
L E t r f T L V O O
O C
A N 9 Z CCK.. O yy pp
Y O M � W m N ` q � 7 Y Y u � Y L O / '•
\ u N N
N W
\ S
N u
N
0
a o
n
e
N
v �
n o
u �d
6
n
1.
c
c
u�
N
O
a
u 1
v w
� c
a a
u
Y J
5 4
r
U O
H
Y
N
q
z c u
0 0
u
F
6 q C
Y O
C
w q
N D L
W 7 q
C 6 6
f N ti
2 1
� O O
O N N
V = 1
u
e
0
u
a
a
T
O
N
T
D
Y
J
Y
U �
Y 9
Oq 6 O
O L
L
q Y
W m
•
0
•
7;�tl
R
1
s
Y N Ol m tD Oi m M m m [O Ki tD aD D) Q! m m m tD t4 m tD
L N N N N N N N t•1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
V
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z N N 10 O n O O O N O O Y\ N O O N O N N 1I1 N O Y\ t0
C ^^ O O\ N O— N 0 0 ^^ 0 0^ O— .-. ^ N O
N
d
C _ _
W
u
c
d _
c
z
u
O J
N f N
6 N
F- N
W �
W O O m
L
u u
a
k"
O
u 1
V
6 O
U N
c c
O
O A d U
U V y C
u c
C L O V Y E V N A A
n c
L " C O m V c 0 p N O n N 6' Y O W
O � O 3 U
d C u A= U S L U u J= O _P d L U 9
E Q N v 2 W m 9 V 2
OM
OI T Y y N T O 8 p ? l O Y Y N Vj C O N
y 9 Y O u> pl t U
W V O L b O h L g Y A U L O L q u g q w cq A
? V u V u
•
0) 0) Y) m m 0) T I1 T T T T S 3 S S S S S •T V\ V\
N N N N N N N J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
F
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n
= O V\ V1 Y\ O N N 41 V\ V\ V1 Y\ !A Y\ Y\ N V\ V\ N V1 V\ Y\ O Y\ O O
w O
O r .• .• r » .• T
Y
•a
7
S Y
t C
N u
Y �.
Y L C Y
Y
r ? `
n o
A V p 22 Z 0 Na u U u i Y l N ` N
k, 0 u
O N N p
�• d Y t 6 N C N 6 6 C 6 F N C C V 0
Y O
V Y u
C O Q Q O N 6 u V Y N
C O N E O W d N N N O m
gk W O V r 4! j y 7 qq q V OO Fy Y` C V Y C Y O 6 ..CCV
'vrfl ? S S V U Y1 m N 6 Y= V Y. V` v p 6 f "Oj at m N 6 1E 4
9
C
W
V
C
V
N
O_
J
� H
N
6
N
'N
N
W
7
�
O
m
i
O
u
i u
.l..
4
O
S Y
t C
N u
Y �.
Y L C Y
Y
r ? `
n o
A V p 22 Z 0 Na u U u i Y l N ` N
k, 0 u
O N N p
�• d Y t 6 N C N 6 6 C 6 F N C C V 0
Y O
V Y u
C O Q Q O N 6 u V Y N
C O N E O W d N N N O m
gk W O V r 4! j y 7 qq q V OO Fy Y` C V Y C Y O 6 ..CCV
'vrfl ? S S V U Y1 m N 6 Y= V Y. V` v p 6 f "Oj at m N 6 1E 4
Y
P
9
1
1
a
z
U m Y1 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
W
O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ZI N V\ N O V\ O V\ V1 V\ O h N O N N O V\ O O O V\ V\ b ul V\ V\ V\
.- . O O -
O
C _ _
V '
Y
6
U
V
O J
H N
6 N
Y
N N
W �
O 0
O
u I
u
¢ o
J Y�
n
b J
u Y u c
u O .O
C V !
C
u P u
> > N u O
Y Y O
V t0J
O O 6 C u= C Y O 2 H N C T
N w1 O C O q
L Y y C u Ij L O EEyy 9
w u m q W W 6 P t V P' IN i 0 N O LL 8— L C
0 Y Y V C�
O u m
C D O O u q N 6 O P D V O U
J
O N M S
YJ 07 0 m m 0
N N N N N N ry ry N N N f0 N N N N N N N N N N ry N N N N
O O O O O O C O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
a
u
u
N '
C _
2
_O J
H N
6 N
n
N N
W �
O 0
Q\
\
u
a o
u c
c a
M N
Y 1 r Y
c ] O
C O � N
Y TF1 a Y L p 0 \'
Y \r N a 6 L 0 O O t ^ L
L q L O U _c L 9 O t N
q L Y O C N u > Y N T D w 7
U N U 2 u> q Y O q C l
C O O •� p Y d O 0 ` 6 CF \y
Y L N �.
Y H U Y =? LL ` V Y Iqi h O Y U l0 O
p U q ¢ O a Y C 6
o
o E u rn
T l O Y C 2 M O C Y C C Y
¢ U U m Y p C J C C O O 0 L T a T C y a'rC' 9- CCp
V U Q U 4 V O O •� q 4 Y J 4 0 I I
V N 1L T 11
i
Y O O O 0
N N N ry N N N N N N
V
O •. .. n r S N I.\ ^ .. .. 1fl r V\ 11 I•.
A
Y
T
9 �
C _
Y
C
Y
M
C
O_
J
f
6_ N
W J
O 0
.J�
A
N O\
2 _
6 0
12
e
0
O
:•
V
9
C
!
L
b
V
V
y
C
c
u
Qq
E
A
w
L
u
O
l
L
8
ON
Y
a
m L
V
q
U
Y
H
•
O
u
N
ON
tl
O
U
Y
tl
O
W
V
G
I.
n9
..
yTj
V
y
C
I'
R`
6
O
Y
O
LL
Y
Y=
m
O
C
O
V•
C
O
u
O
H
J
T
O
C
U
Y.
g
y
V
J
O
A
d
C
C
J
C
T_
A
O
m
T
O
O=
OC
H!
Y
I
L
J
i
C
Z
O
U
Y
u
U
A
L
tl
A
Y
O
J
Y
S
W
q
`
Y
Y
O
A�
S
!
l
C
C Y
y
r
N
T
y
O
l
j p
JCO
!�
f
O
W
N
y
EE
p
88
W66
U
Y
p
LL
W
no
O
S.
y
N
V
N
9C
a�
4
6
NR
OO
12
I
O O O O O O O O O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
ZI O N N N g N A N N N N O N O O N N N N N O O O O O
O
V
O
Q
9
6 9
C _ _
C
6
1
_ Y
O J
I- w
6
O
< C
N w
W J
O O
T
Y
Q O
1 c
tl O
i u
u + D c
tl u
C
N O O
O C !- C
c O N C
6 p O O
•Y M 1
7 C. 2 0 _O w u U 9
V M �
C
O O O tl N r L Cd 0 7 tl
U ! N Y ==
O L O` 4D. w Q J tl Y J O c O S 6 m 0 V
—
g tl c 66
C 9 O R Y C O O pJ
i3
Y
T P
a
T
P T
N P
T
Of
T
T-
N
4
L
.......
N .....
N
-
N N
N
N
N ry
----
ry
ry
ry
N
--
ry
ry
Y V
I
O O O O O O O O O b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N
ZI O N N N g N A N N N N O N O O N N N N N O O O O O
O
V
O
Q
9
6 9
C _ _
C
6
1
_ Y
O J
I- w
6
O
< C
N w
W J
O O
T
Y
Q O
1 c
tl O
i u
u + D c
tl u
C
N O O
O C !- C
c O N C
6 p O O
•Y M 1
7 C. 2 0 _O w u U 9
V M �
C
O O O tl N r L Cd 0 7 tl
U ! N Y ==
O L O` 4D. w Q J tl Y J O c O S 6 m 0 V
—
g tl c 66
C 9 O R Y C O O pJ
i3
7
O
01
A
6
M,
O\ O •- N I+I S N 0 O N I.1 S Y\ •O 1� ts0� O N !•� S
O\ O\ O\ O\ O� Y\ O� � Ol O� YI p• YI � � � n � � m 10 m m Ol 0
N N N IV N N N N N N N N N N N H ry N N N N N N N N N
N
•'
O -
N
•
0
0
0
N
-
N
O
N
O
O
O
V\
0
O
0
O
0
O
O\
O
u1
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
O
0
N
N
M
O
O
O
O
Y
y
N
V
C
W
5
Y
N •
C
Y
_O J
F N
6 N
Y
C C
W 7
O m
T
U I
U
Q O
u
c
q
Y
y
N
C
Y
c
u
N
C
a
Y
0
_c
L u
u
.-
0
u
u
u
rn
3
C
C
In
p
Y
Yp
4
O
C=
L
J
c
u
u
O
w
IQr
d
l
u
L
O
L
0
•
O
U
q
U
U
u
E
_C
Y
L
O
M
O1
C
U
l
S
Q
dd"
Q
y
Q
N
Y
Y
•D
p
c
u
O
li
6O
L
V
N
[
Y
W
u
U
e
Q
W
Y
6
L
C
6
A
Y
Y
L
q
Y
•r
C
L
Y
T
wj
O
OI
N
c
•
q
q~
T=
Z
L
A
`
A
`
Q
V
l
0
6
D
O
Y.
6
I
N
v
_
c
u
Y
L
y
COI
L
O
O
l
J
q
L
2
N
L
C
J
C
O_
._
M
q
L
Y
Y
Y
m
I•
W
O
'l.
q
j
o
Y
Y
Q
L
V
T
tJ
ul
S
Q
J
NJ
lL
m
L
O
D
U
U
L}
��
W
L
O
W
••N�. �
IL
•1��
I 1
i
m m m m n m m m n m
N N N N N N N N N N
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
J
u
c
W
c
u
K
m
W
Y
N
P
c
Z
q
W
6
_W
C
O
I
N
m
•
Y
W
9
8
V
C
0
9
O
Z
C
N
LL
Y
yl
�
"�j1•
O
dl
C
_ �
Vl
y—
O
M
N
�
14
N
O
u
2
u
c
W
c
u
K
m
W
Y
N
P
c
Z
q
W
6
_W
C
J
m
•
Y
W
9
8
V
C
0
9
6'
Z
C
N
LL
Y
yl
�
"�j1•
O
dl
C
_ �
Vl
y—
O
M
N
9
O
J\\
R.
y
Y✓
Y
u
6
Y
Y
u
6j
N�
Y
3—
1
..
O
J
F
H
6_
N
N
H
<
Y
C
N
W
p
�
m
O\
W
u
1
Q
o
14
u
u
c
u
c
u
u
•n
z
c
c
n
m
•
W
C
Y
�
0
O
p
3
9
8
V
C
0
9
6
V
6
Y
C
N
LL
u
U N
c
Ll U
�
"�j1•
O
dl
L
Zi
d
Q
N
y
C
y—
O
M
N
9
O
J\\
R.
y
Y✓
Y
u
6
Y
Y
u
6j
N�
Y
3—
1
..
Y
u
N
N
N
c
C
Y 4
W W
a
7 Z
14
"t ASSwD4w f'" ' 4• •_ • -••• -� - — - -- -- _ •_i— ` - - - -_ SNLCr z Df S SNCnS
(y�
of TRACT,�„ NO. 925N5P
1 SWTN.RANG( I OL ST.SAN BCMNARtINO N(giBiAN.ACCMB•
ING TO THE NAP Of CLCALIOffOA LANDS. IN THE COUNT T Of
SYi BERM& 91AT[ Of CALIFORNIA AS PER YAP MHYO
(D IN BOOK J PAtZ B Of NAPS,OI THE o }r O]( OF THE 0004•
TT R(CMD(R Of SAM COUNTY
THOMAS 0 INCwTCHAN Act 9611 I '
TRACr 9255 - Release of bond
Located on the north side of 6th Street between Hellman Avenue
and Archibald Avenue
OWNER: John D. Lusk b Son
{/ 17550 Cilatte Avenue
P. 0. Bex C -19560 y
Irvine, California 92713 I�
iI Performance Bond (Road) $100,000
NOTE: The roads were accepted into the Maintained Road System L.
by City Council on September 6, 1978. At this time, va-
are requesting that this bond be released since the
roads are in the aystem and the bonds are of no further
use.
jintr
. 1
ABlf(
f M.. NAv+y. lNlw.. JJYMTi1'.r fA.+
nr.rMw IfN J.•. %w .vNM...+y.
f•N •nr,Nr/t.f.(Ap JNr./r N/a..>rw.
J , f•I rM / Y / /b(jNlf/ NMl.. L yH // Of >f Y
I fNN4/ /I /1•IJr, A�.,� /!f /wttl/�.AX.Y ✓I ✓O /Ja r�-T
J •AM1Ib INN III•G74.fNIl!}alC Y 11r 4`t tl
MO' /fir/ MIrMr
! fN 4q /w•.L,..MM /flMtlNwf�..n+s , ', I n•Pf
Im
TCR/JTO.r OT SAN GRYARONY ( Y
&E/ A 5'130&15/ON Of LOT SL.FOCTNRL IROSTLCSS INWT
COMPANY SVO=gS/ON NO Z. AS PCR YAP RCCOROLO IN
800M Za. RCCOROLRP[INWTT Of SAN ILRNARONO. S7 Tf Or T CAWORMA
ANORLASfN CAGWCLRING CO.
YAY 1171
NOT[S
rfr"rl a/W /rM /.r./Y. J '(lY MrN.I I.n/y lr.fM�Npr+�ar
! /Malw/MM/r /aIY M.r /JLNl4 • J �Ll(/•A/IIMI (.•rI �•Y'•
N /y aY t Ill•M.Na Ylb+�b/ t
r.r..rbY bO NM.^il. M /K/!S! J INI M'Li•r a/n
F hrra.••r HIN IaR.rM /.a.. RIr J M /YI /I RN µ/ ~ON ..•A�J/ pl
a.N.f nN bw'f nl wl ✓�� M� a .t L /rN /.r1 N /�•�
.y rM w./ R•./Yt•N+. /I O N.Nr/ r^..•"i Mar
..yu rM'wM .Yw.
rA.M NM /b(JNhN <inr r h (w"a' IaN
llfl bYN/ ' .rwya
ff Ir .Y!/M
N IrM 1J ✓W �rM
! ir ryNr..nN/r \ i
t w IrJf
it r/ Y�r
r/ru ✓r� wens w:� '�` .
i1.r..r aer v
1 n
9 m 1 1 I I N 1 R• I I ri r
Y Y I 1 Il r _P r i
r ua l a �. 1� R M i 1 .Ii 1 K IIF •,Wnp.
m o$o ah
a
i j s
Wi
T N Q 1 �� I a° 1 1 • 1 !! II i if
0 Y roW n 1 1 •, .rr r< wbr 1 1 S I rra I�3• 11
O !_UII
O
m u u .wqi u.°. � ik `f'_ -r �._ _ :•_al F • w.rrrm
p O O V Y Y... q 4• P'•���
ai I t��`dl /Mi. w STP
Sf Y Y< O C O
C O Y !C v v v 0 u O I • „ w / I {��1
M'i
G J O fJ Y C O C O T
u 2
A
091 /m YI n° n° Y .ui m . _. 1... 1 k ea ,.
81 a v Y u 1 i n 11 : ;�.te
M U Y C.4 O O C n L
ep t
i JCp N m.�-. G Uq Uq fYqr O u m I f Q t a r • )
O •O O � F S F y i D I t t l ". M Li // �. r� Ikr, , <' /
L___�____
e� G 9ey Y Y Y —f Manr O /
.Oa a'i ! LCJ/ON
wN AI ENV£
q q q I AKM
G if(lltM
d fl /I lM /N/
� flll Ya /OI r
Y 1
:w A
btalt 0r."D'
_I T r- - - -�
9EUOJ6GT NTATIVE I 19 TRACT
TD.AGT
Noretak 51 �
I /
L—!5 53 —3 J
tR W vu,l,
u
i RACT I `o
Eli
5 5'?
�I I\\ `� T 9tataro hl LJ
NIL TINT Tm'r o\ERUES
IL Puvou7 TcvT. TRp6T 6119
Dlvd
0
—I
VICINITY MAP
Tract 8892 — Release of Agreement and Bonds
Located on the east side of Turner south of Church
OWNER: Vanguard Builders, Inc.
9211 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucmonga, California 91730
Labor 6 Material Bond (Sauer) $ 5,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (Water $16,000
Labor 6 Hstezirl Bond (Road) $42,000
NOTE: Since there are no liens against this tract filed
with the City Clerk as of February 16, 1979, these
bonds are subject to release.
!EI
Ig
water
4.
9iree
bpaci
9
buildI
6.
Publit
7.
This
b.
!his
-Oi.
bery
Pot
Tract 8892 — Release of Agreement and Bonds
Located on the east side of Turner south of Church
OWNER: Vanguard Builders, Inc.
9211 Archibald Avenue
Rancho Cucmonga, California 91730
Labor 6 Material Bond (Sauer) $ 5,000
Labor 6 Material Bond (Water $16,000
Labor 6 Hstezirl Bond (Road) $42,000
NOTE: Since there are no liens against this tract filed
with the City Clerk as of February 16, 1979, these
bonds are subject to release.
!EI
Ig
df
MEMORANDUM
Date: February 16, 1979
r.
..
To: Lauren Wasserman
s;
''-
From: Bill Holley
S^
Subject: Installation of Playground Equipment
Lauren, the City has been receiving donations of playground equipment during the
last year.
i
Originally, the intent was to have the park maintenance work crew (3 men) to install
demand increase, it
r
withoutylettingcrequired routine items sunance
it. 143wever with ffer .
been
has not possible
Therefore, to comply with the intention of the gifts, which was for equ',Pment that
authorization to seek
can pbidetheotnstatlationdto a coommercial contractor ,
_
Project consists of excavating 6" of soil, banding perimeter with concrete curbing,
with 6" of silica sand. While
installation of equipment, and filling playground pit
equipment cannot be just "stuck in the ground'.
this may iourd excessive, playground
The liaoility factor in operating a playground without a "cushioning" ,naterial is
taken to eliminate injuries.
high, as all "reasonable and prudent action has not been
The two playgrounds would be at Alta Loma Park and Lions Park
I have no "firm" estimates on costs, but it is not expected to exceed $4500.
equest at solicit Lh t to
01- 50- 28.ContractualServices
ro
e account
Request an agenda date of February 21, for Council consideration
BH /m+
"Lt
ORDINANCE NO. 58
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 711E CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING
REQUIREMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC RICHE
OF NAY INFROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH
BUILDING CONSTRUCTION.
The City Council of the City of Poncho Cucamonga, California, does ordain
as follows: \
SECTION 1: Stret a and Highways - Dedication required
No build g or atructure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and
no property shall hereafter improved for parking purposes, and no building permit
shall be issued therefor, unle s the one -half of the street, which is located on the
same aids of the center lion o the street ae such lot, has dedicated sight -of -way
'or full width of the lot ao os o meet the Master Plan and /or Standards for such
treat. In addition to required rdlcation for street purposes, additional dedication
for storm drain, sever, water or her utility purposes may also be required in con-
nection with buildine vermits whey such dedication is necessary to prevent the flood-
ing of adjacent or nearby propertia or to permit connection to required utilities.
No a public easement anlessianiencroachme tupermitlhas been t issued by the City nEngineerthl,
Any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an
offer to dedicate property, executed by al part lea of interest including bennficiaries
and trustete in deeds of trust as shown by current preliminary title report prepared
by a title company approved by the City Eng ear. Such report shall be on a form
approved by the City Attorney and the City E ineer; be In such terms es to be binding
on the owner, his heirs, assigns or successor in interest; and shall continue to efface
until the City Council accepts or rejects such \whch
SECTION 2: Construction of street imprs - required generally
Any person, owner, lease., t constructing or arranging for
the cone truction of any parking lot or commeriidential or industrial building,
or buildings, or building addition or alteratill also provide for the construct!,
or installation to City Standards and the reous of the City Engineer, of sidevall
curbs, gutters, street trees, adequate street , street paving to the center lin,
of the atreat. and necessary drainage structursuch improvements already exist
along all ctreet frontages adjoining the lot oa building or parking lot 16 to
be constructed, enlarged o r altered.
exceptions
1. This section shall not apply to adds lone made to single
family residence where the square foe area of such additions
does not exceed fifty percent of the a ea of the residential
portion of the building axis tang prior o addition.
2. This section shall not aooly to sit erect a made to a sinele
family residence when the value of the proposed alterations does
not exceed fifty percent of the value of the building being
altered prior to its alteration.
I 1
3. This section shall not apply to construction of or additlom
to-garages. earports, storage buildings and similar non-
residential buildings, accessory to single family residences
whete such construction or addition does not exceed 500 square
foot in area
•r SECTION 3: Construction of street improver +•a - Prerequisite to approval of
the Building Official
The Building and Safety Director shall deny final approval and acceptance
for public utility connections to any building or parking lot until required street
Improvement exist or are constructed or•their construction is guaranteed with an executed
agreement and cash money deposited with tho City In a am approved by the City Engineer
based upon me and cue -half times the estimated cost of construction.
SECTION 4: Construction Agreement
The construction guaranece agreement shall be effective on the date of
the deposit of cash and shall end upon the date of completlua to the satisfactfon_of the
City Engineer of all improvements required to be made. Upon completion of thn improvemeni
and their acceptance by the City, the cash deposit shall be returned to the owner.
The City to authorized, Ir the event of any default on the owner's part,
to *so any or all of the depneit money to cause all of the required work to be done or
completed, and for payment of all costs and expenses tbeeafore. Any money remaining shal
be refunded to the owner.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of February, 1979.
Mayor
-n P% .
• •
N E N 0 R A N D U M
DATE: February 15, 1979
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
FROM: Jerry Crant
Buildleg Official
SUBJECT: Electrical Code Revision
Because of a technicality In the Covernment Code for adoption of codes by
reference, action by the City Council at the last council meeting needs to
be reaffirmed.
It is my understanding that first reading of the ordinance was not accomplished,
only action to set a date for public hearing Under the provisions of the
Government Code, first reading Is required before a date for hearing is set.
Accordingly, appropriate action would be adoption of two separate motions.
The I,rst one would be a motion, "to introduce the _ordinance and direct the
be in order.
JC:ba
in, a
would
i
W /I.s.. N. 3o
. 0.1..1a a n\ cm m1{tL O TK CITY a SAVO
WTI. ULlrs.11, 11n1114 TI4 1 17I RITIM A 114
YTIO1a LUMIM tat tlt1.t14 {hill. OV.14ff
ntNa .L4CaI3T TO 14{T'MAI 1 11DITIU4.
Its city [wstll of too city of W.I. O .ra M.s w61s as f.11..a
Leal. 1. O.Ia. {. Olabl. 3. Yltl. 1. d IN W $.. "I. hasty (:d.
./sptd N maaaa. Y. It 1. YuA .spetl M.
still. I. "sl..f all fllll. of that Yllr.l 111.110.411 foal.
r.. 1N ,w•a..1'«list ufgrd. Y ppr... tat F•Nn1
I. stud. vl.ly far is. w of .Lariat, I as CIA,
Wt nn.b ..• L..s a t%* 1.11..1 fl..Nlal 6 -. 1111
dltl.. T aN W osas..Id N a. Nll. ) Ilr. Ltntl.
Na.tlal. L.IdIN .11 of to all... W
.." s1I l.nlw. ae.sst as a. YU.ftr. 41a404. WIf1.1
�r.whl I, W. Orll.... Ors. (3) t to .f Wr\ alI t•Y
r fll• b t4 dfln .r 1M Ca. CI.� bI y *Ila ....t
W IaM..1.. 1. IN.N .M•a4 by .fanx..t W.. "t at
III. hl1s.. a tl.t\ a. NnI 1. Oa O.tlw.. 1. 1-11.
Y...a. a •....sl.ss. Wlllw. .Y "Islas...
hnI 1. N. Cdl..wq W al3 toa. wit Y 1. as t4
'{arlaW W. d as al, .f Y.\. clap'.
Settls I. Snla. M if ..a Il.r.artl W. I. swtd 1. r.Y as M111m1
OaI31A 1
OI4.Y
w•1 TIM
IN• We .Nil Ir Iwu n tN ««taut W., M.mr
W sty YMV' 1. ..d 1. al. 'data. It .hall rY
llwwlal 6...f Is GA at tstN c....sa.
w.0 II4U4
Us toast .1 W. I.I. 1. N p.I" ...Il.w mIa-
.ast. am Nna..t .1a P..blwt /. i W AM V {wI W
...al.. Ill. W. I.W.. 1.1 ...t1.W at. .1 mod
I 1N N11.t1 II.aINI Ws rt .Iraaut ..'imam. of
ze tall.4 6111m1..
wan. a.l.l... of W. W. twala +Its Ober .raallw..
W .n wnnp N. anlns. W{I tall.
M.3 ILLf3t I14,cOIt
11 1. the IYI... .f out. W. N p..11. basis .Isis
•.«.lama .•..Nud ..vaaA far u4q. William
."assay W N •Nalr.l uf.tssdat of Pa... a" at
I IIIIN.r main.. awl act, «last. has b.rl..11.1.1
I. as ....f .I.AI.IA a. Ilpt. YLL. pssr..da.
.I a la, W a. as, •+Item, as ss13 , «wallas$ h,
fails'. olsaw.f •LalNl ...
OIY11141 11
IO4a[iY1141
a•1 I.RIf3 p 114 IVIIOI4 .11L'/L
asr HIIII., Offlral of as illy or YI/I. O aaaa ... \1t
M.1 Ntd rw... aa.. b ..bit? 1• .f...11 y.«
•LIsa d al. c . N ..I. spas Willis.. last palls
fa M INtsaall... 01..•1..1 alnal.a Maly. I.alrr
W /I.s.. N. 3o
. 0.1..1a a n\ cm m1{tL O TK CITY a SAVO
WTI. ULlrs.11, 11n1114 TI4 1 17I RITIM A 114
YTIO1a LUMIM tat tlt1.t14 {hill. OV.14ff
ntNa .L4CaI3T TO 14{T'MAI 1 11DITIU4.
Its city [wstll of too city of W.I. O .ra M.s w61s as f.11..a
Leal. 1. O.Ia. {. Olabl. 3. Yltl. 1. d IN W $.. "I. hasty (:d.
./sptd N maaaa. Y. It 1. YuA .spetl M.
still. I. "sl..f all fllll. of that Yllr.l 111.110.411 foal.
r.. 1N ,w•a..1'«list ufgrd. Y ppr... tat F•Nn1
I. stud. vl.ly far is. w of .Lariat, I as CIA,
Wt nn.b ..• L..s a t%* 1.11..1 fl..Nlal 6 -. 1111
dltl.. T aN W osas..Id N a. Nll. ) Ilr. Ltntl.
Na.tlal. L.IdIN .11 of to all... W
.." s1I l.nlw. ae.sst as a. YU.ftr. 41a404. WIf1.1
�r.whl I, W. Orll.... Ors. (3) t to .f Wr\ alI t•Y
r fll• b t4 dfln .r 1M Ca. CI.� bI y *Ila ....t
W IaM..1.. 1. IN.N .M•a4 by .fanx..t W.. "t at
III. hl1s.. a tl.t\ a. NnI 1. Oa O.tlw.. 1. 1-11.
Y...a. a •....sl.ss. Wlllw. .Y "Islas...
hnI 1. N. Cdl..wq W al3 toa. wit Y 1. as t4
'{arlaW W. d as al, .f Y.\. clap'.
Settls I. Snla. M if ..a Il.r.artl W. I. swtd 1. r.Y as M111m1
OaI31A 1
OI4.Y
w•1 TIM
IN• We .Nil Ir Iwu n tN ««taut W., M.mr
W sty YMV' 1. ..d 1. al. 'data. It .hall rY
llwwlal 6...f Is GA at tstN c....sa.
w.0 II4U4
Us toast .1 W. I.I. 1. N p.I" ...Il.w mIa-
.ast. am Nna..t .1a P..blwt /. i W AM V {wI W
...al.. Ill. W. I.W.. 1.1 ...t1.W at. .1 mod
I 1N N11.t1 II.aINI Ws rt .Iraaut ..'imam. of
ze tall.4 6111m1..
wan. a.l.l... of W. W. twala +Its Ober .raallw..
W .n wnnp N. anlns. W{I tall.
M.3 ILLf3t I14,cOIt
11 1. the IYI... .f out. W. N p..11. basis .Isis
•.«.lama .•..Nud ..vaaA far u4q. William
."assay W N •Nalr.l uf.tssdat of Pa... a" at
I IIIIN.r main.. awl act, «last. has b.rl..11.1.1
I. as ....f .I.AI.IA a. Ilpt. YLL. pssr..da.
.I a la, W a. as, •+Item, as ss13 , «wallas$ h,
fails'. olsaw.f •LalNl ...
OIY11141 11
IO4a[iY1141
a•1 I.RIf3 p 114 IVIIOI4 .11L'/L
asr HIIII., Offlral of as illy or YI/I. O aaaa ... \1t
M.1 Ntd rw... aa.. b ..bit? 1• .f...11 y.«
•LIsa d al. c . N ..I. spas Willis.. last palls
fa M INtsaall... 01..•1..1 alnal.a Maly. I.alrr
4 0
InIwR. aN mipr..t. ill
u1r aRh w.>I[oloo. W rani•
'tan
or Ur I.w.11ollw..kbtrk..k Id r.Mlr of NI rlRstlwl
- mog..e Iloo.. 11 an.... kpib.1.• .Hk1.w.. uIM.r'.
.volt..' .d .,I Inik. Maw•...I.us or bo,"'oIn olWk
H.la Nlrtlta is or INn... rw... a.41WIk.
91•1 Imw .TIM
M1 ,"I' lA.n t. atw Inol..nt b W ',qo,' ,
rlRnirlt) no. W .Mtos R onmo . •! Sol mnnb-Ir ertoo 111111 n [- /Mira. tbs ur . slur')
IwIr/1nN L t4 W.q ol .I .R'Iw. b I'. t.1 pr vol"
1 ol.nl.Ia, too ub Ill Ra knl l[.ww •f W a n nlr.
1-.RUn11•. t► rw111. Crrlola w Mrkr _, it 1. oob
"Ill. I. to , t► r.r. ho W I.. M1. .M.rmr llnr ..
pawn . w .. so I rotor . -woo 1. NIA _I Wi/
M In1.11N n .I a t4 tnm R rulu or a. ..wl .....
OIol.Y 111 _
111)11n owl Tin
ql 'uun
or kl1.nnr or .Hill- kk,l M wk 1. .q nlnlq -mbs.
rr asks, I. rill., to ,M I1.JY or ....I1... - or .os
.IRwlr Hill. Man or k.•l1Y -I". or -q or, ,lw\
Iwrolw.'n.rltl. Vrifma..1 .111,n autrlolq. It.It•
tin It ..luP m W IY is .11. k.l.roo took['.. n up
W. of "W" .. m. IS rm. opt ..mwN fn
4x.1.. N "..I'hr, fan' .N.I.uS to .Instills Mnit
'owl. 11w 11111111" Olfl'IU.
uQ)}IM,
1 .IRUI.ol M.At la ..l r.wlyd . k lM bll -W orbit
/. "I. r"I, oars..rk . r.Mirl' rl.h aN w,
ni'tkr. rrflaalY f..R. twg1Y wq .RIn. IN I.•
.,.'bI. lost-, bb" 1.1.1. rosaolY /rk'.di W W
Il
}. I..u11.1Iw- nN or .1.'NSw) .rpl >. nitr). or
[000000lull•o- .11111.0 w III ..it. •t ll.1r tonta•.I
uk ryll'ofll..
f. 1.11.11.'106. olwntlr so rlMlr or .IRulnl yali.wl
6.0.11" b .1 for L ol.ul<Ist .yil> q..) f. W ..
If both .1 .1 I. I► Iw.1.1lw, lr.nluloo. 11.111[106
u w'ar'y of rl Rlrl'w >.
1. LRlrwa Alin l..rR1 fish.. or Irsirla isms.
IRnof w. MIl•r q.
.•! Wtl"Tlm II), 11R1n
hl lull- for ol-rtolnl (Roll. halrplq 'lo mI n 1 I.
.611 M .Ir b .IUY 1. t6. SIll11.i NIIIIkl. Too .i1lln'1-
-klt M -sw.ld q rook fl-.. w1.sslflwti...d RW.I.,
.1 .r M watup a kuMr WI ►r 11. I.... .w. •.
IRt11M .111 1 k .kwnw> U. IM iR1Lr... If too knlir•
w al. 4. nR.laY 1. .1or....lst. tf .. It f0000l I}11 W
1.11.11.11w to LRwkN .111 . . 1. .11 1'.1 r.pirwnl.
of W it lir. 1. b.. 1.k torn 1.lq a olR 'i.l.. I Mr.l, for
W a .... ll.l- .., N '..0. .. "1 .> loo W. 11. t\.
In1.11.oloo Iq.IM I. loo "roll ol'trl t6. . ', of W
klllwi Cfwt1. /. Th• .ar. or .111IW 1Teaw1.tb• of for
..t.r. W .?.I. M nwlrM Y st4tt WItIWs aura.
u IY adds. sal wlYrltf. a Iroaaa it tap M .,lands
W ►n Unlf/ lYl W a.wnl. sYrwf ... aM11
tMa [salt, .f /aja/.
n -1 lssta 2 a nwpl
Ilaplul Malts sisal Y bstsl «If is list. 11[wW [r-
11ala., or Wp as a's.r rtMrltY r.ryrenptlnt. WE
it dd W slat W 11 lY sat W W. 1. lltuW y
W East. .f f.IIImU 1. 4.
flpalQt{:
1. t Y.rwna•s poll q Y I..Y 4 n war dd b to s.sf
ra.1.1Y y this W. pmbiq 4.1«vl[Ip I. ..Islas twill
•nlliq ...I «gals.), fa Ittlq P . Iat"" 4.sr1
«agra Yp1Up W wsa.n b .,I..IU tat All{Iq..
U [M a7[ lYt .a .al M... U tY f[f, flat. of sa
wll Ialll.t .Y «[«wa YIl11q, .Y wta[n..Y Wt W
' a. 'Ml" by a {all W U Y «ealtl y 41/
Jr. YI M.w. fan, a wq.ngw raavh glalq
sae p11tIN rlM.t.r. N«Rlgro rf rU .lot Insist W
sN.l. u ara *1«[rlul rbtss«r Molt.
`. 4 rl «plot Molt ur M Uw.1 Y . rtpanullw Y
Wl, Ed. fafit apausiw for Ita.ru/ sal U [rwe-
tlw siU Os It. vw 1 «s. I.abg.. fir«a1s nttl. M
tlgbr .r /rrrsat Intglalws. /roltN lot ssfa tna"
y IY prnit It t. Y /«1.rtY fr ttra..f W atttlut lw
.Y /atlro.r. W[ Il.r..n 4 iee r prtr. gl.ttl at W
Iwa.t stn. r[l ltw..a Ngq U U«gltl. iwt poll
tYll ..fU*.11tb s lass sf«Ifltl y tY Yllllq tMfl[L1, Ml
...ad .0 ({I rtlt tl*t. W tYll .rt y rnerl.
n.{ .nl
la. fa NMrlddl p..lp W q«[gul .Ia [Y[tlq .YII
M u uu111sM y nwlalw .f 1Y tlq ( 11
113 ME.f1MCRf ff
Y .IMtI[.1 ssrt fa alt[ •poll I. r.wltY ."It Y s
«saN I..a YIl11q a pals is •pals Y A. ...I. rrf
sisal I..s Ua Ill.. W.IM. Il.n w.f fn.WU. pwlt Is
attar" y Uls W. Is Its"" n [aass[tl sltlat .Usl.iq .
peals• W M dl. 11 tlstlssrN a . It .f u Iantiptl.s
y t�f4+1.11sOp1[ISi. IY ta.l tea as YUU s,at'll "I
UI Ias ". M sa .f s «l IbU l« a psap WII Y
f 4 U 1Y a.I. sf Wifwtt, rr I— ."leaur of tl.
Rrsserlttl [snit, a p.11la
lt.{ to town mu n taarulfu
As g.11.1ra1 all 1..a tr.s.f.rsfl..
ME Iatlalfmp n> in
Usa pan WII n.lr. W Y[w. rll sa all y IUls.tlw
la .a .Y w wrs a O. f.11sslq rasw.l
t. tfrse.w tY *tattle .ftlq w1YrItN y . petit t. Wt
•w«seN Attlt ro fafW Uwt/ (11p1 4IS law W 4U Y
In.ucs *f .sal pole.
2-4
i. .4nrr.1 two Ilnat .Iraq ...ilrlul y . poll W kw
w.pNN..NNW or IlKw"no, In . tntluw. pens of
M ►mllof ln." (120) 1.]..
1.IrO.. noltlw rfp[K .I an Ip0iftn \, Ntih 1]0 my Of
...301, II .If.1 . 30plw of IN nook nl4rnN y .wl
Mnit M. k...."no" 1...nN.a1 .Iti U. WI.
1. .Mn.-or NI 1.]11( Opp I... A.tq IO .it..
I•.rIN of 1 20 430 norm" w I... Soon M pant of I4
"1.2 or a. Ont,111 .111g ..t4r1.N y
Off.. rnm[.[Ip. "-it"" .Irbt r.rar.r .K\ttfN y
I e.1.1 w "I' on.11 N .h it i tMrtr.tl. no If.
hr . n" 0 pn" Wti M.. Ulf 4. fa moll"
NN f"-I- Inn11N .Ki 1.1..1..1 W.4nsl U. .It
t }.t gY0t..106.OU.
t14rU6itq w rtulln
]U 1111141" "flow not ..30M .r rfrl. .v d.trlul
pnit 1. .1 or O. 111.1" n.wur
!.r 4ti4 .I sucS . real n .I.a NI[i w11 Nn bn [na
poll.
t• ..r udtla .nrp ....... it. or huh, N lU . Ilu\Iw
vpn Nifk .11 poll 1. I..W. N
}. pr f.pvn to tnpr'IN NI rr..l.l...f ...Ktlw In
l.o w. pml.nt 1. ItKlr1[ltyl .noo v. w1. of t.rK•
\I." W lo. tlw 111t III ... fm i...pIM: -1 I. hll..
bIM \.y.1ti .OK tMn If W. 1a N111w lM, 4} M r.
to .2.[4lfitmn.b . W ...Iw. N W. W. 30rt.I1q
92•0 A!!W .11101Cn1.3 0]14ry1.}
]+V if1.111Klttlut Yl.leuleflrll[fIKW MI-71M
uy'I. I it...1.
A" in,N
hr .N Nu. .e ..n.I 1Klrlf.l Infurt. �fnit. rn. fn
..i Ionit .hat& M ..a f.lar tltr =,T It. I..
4...nnI 1...1.1 u1.[Kw. pnll .411 ...110 f. 1M
!nr 4-1-9 "IC), I..". hl.. Lmq Im of ua rnq
..w.1 ul.nvn. pnll..Ulf M I.....1.
Fri ptMrhN SO, on ulK.ua. poll WII M Ilo11N
. N1.II.tlw., 11..I=.....Im W ubtf..a. 11
1 K.1..1 .f rlq .N w.lpwt In " no K.1" Ullllp..
q•10 lt.11ltl Se ...
1p4�S 0!01}4
'In .r flr30r11w 4.Ip .kblW w .not 41..
....Itf4w pelt .MII bw • w i " wIm
If1 w1. wfi poll ..1 W Ielaq wlltl.1 .hall M.
t.0 q m1 rKK1.,
qa. Ilft.. (IS) Iq. foll.b( lM a.l .r.ti..... ru..
tM plow, 1n qur..npw. NILE w[k.m.1 41p...K.
poll ... bmN .411 Iruull N W UII1" 11"".1 .
....t Klr 113019 1 .11 .IKaul nook M. blot too pKNI.t
wrt..M .hall Nu.. poll f.t .K1 noel. 0... I.
".eta] 0.n1. hr .0 .UII M t4.. a f.1i f. I'M,,
4sau1 0.n....gt IMr. [I'll N p .w... h. rU,".
.I.11 tIIVAt
..1 .nt tUl .q I... .U11 N. N.InN a .tnKlui
pen[ wt. "it. .1 On nott . wwlmon t.ntl y .Ki
30.1\ -MIS M. M.. ..K.,N W .Ki 0fn1\ 'MIS I.. .1K1
11 ti. Mll1 ... .IIt11�f ...Ittf.�nl[.r. 130. "...11.
m.. w . hn 0mI W
.S•
tln.fere. WII M n1111N t• Kt,.1 t To rut ano.l
b eq it loo.tt Pat) or IM 'roll f.. IttUt, pot fee both 91.1[1 Ire✓. tot "If. of t• ft :,.low .Mel
..K M 1.11 tW 1. Mll... (310.001•
!4t.. • p.•it t Iatrl t me y w 4ltllry writ[.
1 1 a .411 M more/ IT .,If ... t .po ...let of elan
fw..K foeo the .plle ✓I.
4 wool 1411 M Ir..IN .1w rrallpt .f t. fees[[ Mavl
rn tot. r• p✓ Son.", pant N t. Mnit o plt..Ma\
In. Ike vplo. of 1M 0.. tSKK.2 ft Wt M o.tr1N, f
[Mt11e3 M. Mn prbnM a • tt •f pau. t oft
tt te'l'l pout (an) of the IIn tM.alq b. WIS M rot
fvNN, Me.v. the MKfw N the M fattN 0411 . .' M
lu. me to "Alto. (310.00)
The 4111tL Cffl.ltl aoll atlal) %I ... It u M W flat or
.I .pplitet t Io a .I" I" .at 1M\ r.frl eMll M poll
t "rolled A Ir fn t. pol•ne of tbRa .O.I.K the all.
91-13 WatflGUtn p M1.Ia4. K Ltr..Scl"
t,- r "Ibbe pp111ry P. .ulltlntin a o.l..nawo elryt.
ties W pot - to or twy YIbr. (UO 00) fn o —t..
wURmUw. W .....10th poo ....irll.•.
Sl.t 1) t. 41111.[ 0111.1.1, .halt t •IKtICAI r11.
M prv. Hellos tie• tot KrlMtlet .e f..ryy to Ml.
Illtalw aft. I.p• of w 491 .N )vl•nt or u W Illwt
1. bleu. (810.00) Iw to rota.leaalw.
1. Sleety .relater, "...ala, ef. Sut• Llntpaa fwtmim
ll[mr u Lr
of If N.lift ... lw by ..tMr lo.err.ul ry.Mr
e.eptllo t at 41111.[ Y11.1.1 ..l M marrN t wade
No 1pall.l. N al. antes. bbK of . sleliw 1411
rl A. owa11✓N n • wlof or .q to ow.ItN y ttl. malty.
[ail .ra u1.Irr Un4l.lra wtlflutlw. Ito .pen
O.awMr S[t of rtt lUr .N atoll M r.t.N .1al. as.,
(a) 491 Urtw /bo.r pant of w...r I r—.I fn N
to Yltt (It 0.001.
OlUtw e
It T rl 1 410 /eO.fDQlf1
91 -3 IWLCTIYC SIC tOSLR100
0p•t tapttlw .f W .ere Nla W 1m wtMrlabe by I..
• of oe "IS. It 'Mt M two bar of the peas. /ln o
[IrpOntlw I.atlll.2 tot tr• to MISS) the 4U /l( Offitt
N0 a4ll Iupt a e lutllol...t at tow rl tilt t
BIT"
ffl.lal fIW IM So So he t lufmla lots Ow,
l rl.l M
pwtlra •f tell W. 11 .q rtq tot .mw. fen
[7mer e
Mel.. IM Ivutltlw aN ..it. 'ovatmotion N tSo the
fart t lot 1.IIr 1 f. i.,ma.
114 tot lotitlb.l.1 le rl
Lm.Ol wt •t floe To
14 41t1. 11, the tall I wt Mtltl el pow. floe "J a
U.. ". (orl to tWLt1411t1elnlfeal.IlaM ...of" title
It (to) 4.1. .to lulnUw .N rtlflutlr, •o rttl• O..r
fUto.N. tW a 1.111" be t• 41111.( Of(Iab1. MlMllt•
Al. to, .•aaallw aN .o of twp nor rr1 [411 M eal• 1.
torl�Vi, :tl :M.11 M Kt.•t•1it npt. K • air t be at.tw
by IM 411 41ry 0(Ilt.l.
93-3 I.6rycTIM all= 0441101}
to IN port of • .111.2 I .C.Imin le t M If". for Nr
by the ",Tart pbmnt of port of the r1141.2, the pnw,
2h
•M
fl.. n frrinnllm Iuu111Y W .I11Y W11 wlny Af
"itl. 4 t. ..rl W fKI t t1a .f n• N.W. w ."
W11 wf M nwu1N rill lIK Mn Mn L.f.NN fN dprt$
Fm .11 . WI w I Ineliftlwf. Wr• <ft..fnl of PM
.f •1111 Pf.r Nf " MamGb Af wild.. fin .1 1 IMo .,I,
1•.l lllla lM•ar ty II&. {br IM, hill /la Offl[In M..1111
f.d WgKtlr. ,Mil M W. pdWulll Mlq W pm.... I,.
•f IM .•t1. TIr b1Uly ar1tlN fMil My t4 lfnr a n-
.nr. v reKln IM ntlrA N. or Nun[Ilw WI wntlU
wapr I4wt11r .f f1 NKUIUI .Wipna.
•l•1 LW {U4 a CVa[Rivl a [t1RI1Gl IRitlflft
I2".2". WII M r nnuKf In ..rfalw •f Ovam..i .f llllln
ftal Mildly. Ilm•Iq' Mnlq fN fir .Nlllwl4 Initl•
tlw n i.wWN U W fN fpma M. Wr tl[n tl .y bll4
1y fw[It w M ..wKIN a atI nllltivs W atII N1 aw
...11.11. I.." Nluw. W. Man .mdli".11I, .Wn
.rymN M. Mn (lilt • 1.1.N frw'm wildly "Italia.
III t11A1R.III.t
nm fN1Utlt. fllrnllw• o oltl•Iwf •f •bla Lufll.ntl
n IrftfW, W aM vbll.{ Idt... w m LH.11) " SitIN
fmNla M n.o •rlllula t. IYK•, [•L n ..tn N aM
olnlq •arty b rt mdr M tM gbin .f lM M�f/14 aft•
.Ifl. W nlnly r1111 uN ..t M iaWM
alt LLIOGIID WltDlq
L III l.1.1 nriq I. WKnN Mll /Op [hill .mll> tt)o t),•
r.v.IrsrU
Italy 61[ fn .w MndlV..
sit titl[Rty swtvmrf
nn fy NKnl..l mlwnt 1, fW by I. Mildly alltlN
a Ir ds,.. t• wI.nr .r M wlu.. Memn It I. Lrretln
n Lfrtlara Iuf.11N, tM wf.tl, tin naerp mlw r.aw•
f III. hit lM NKrrlul Ma•nt .Mil
fN rM .tlwlrtill" a b nItxltf t q
iar a NnerLa n hi1M •Ktlw
mlpwt b ur. s
!
tNlalw.
I( lda nA b wt .ad AI..1. abf S May IN b itf
dl.. t II, ."I uN b1111q afltlat [Mil May r[M.f11 u
nI# QW 1I •NK t.f tl nal lw..n at fft.. fmlu u
It .IKtrl41 .Kl..nl. W.q wntl. fan n [•nfrftllt
It pllnul
•min fIdl .1a Nxnlul
WII t• ..It ll. n Iwu ." Ml I
mt ".'" s n
•Ilw It u M rn.n.nN wfO fpmdl Mf Mn {ruW n1or
MIY m ntlw W .fr of KA nN4. /nfeu. fry1WYn. w
a ma N mgmn....rt .Kratr> Lf .far •r Pru.f tl •f
Say. •Mn.IMN. WITAI ra u) m Mal •IA 1M w.I
•f t•f )In Dadfl.I.. ud bOdly afltil •Inl Ifr. fM Mb-
11> W ItlNWUII awa tM IlnwaNw .f •K flKanul •Kip
.tlt.
n-[ OMCI101 " {NU a dtmal
It .MII M —1.4.1 fn .q pow. fin w ..rpr.tir t• 4a[
ttlatlltl 1.. • ... at •11[[11[11 n.let fr a vall> NKll1.
.min t. da nnarl. •111.9 tnla.. I"at., n .p1p..t
der IM tuulWllw at NIA •Ir nit /• rnd,ed, 1.a .1a
)^rw., fin •r <npnalw Aql MI. .MA.N ulnh.nq
t1. ull /I1 Militia am, fKL N11q. t•Ap..
ffI1WK.. n .plptlt m 1..11 if.p[a O [wf•nly 11tl
•11 (111.11• IryN wnbltlf.
27t
.1.
aJ Unfun.
nl. W. •hill Art). too Knd to "ll.os I..r ]".r t1.
.ap.'Ihilltr a u0 p "r w4I. ".ntln. [sonlll" o
1CSt1111n or ooml11[ o ?"Sta IKtrlt rty I". r is, d
lost 4r Amp• r i"Soo o .1o. he t..stl y .n M1-
.% 11.1111, %I .Aril t\. the It'nlr N 411 ' •uwln 0'
Pots I4)Illy .r rr. of t1. tupKtla utMrl W 1. "1.. tt
.nr.ra Abw a 1.1.11 y1.r11tl.
51.0 fO4tna
At, ,.r.. lira .. umr.'ICO. rl.l.un In vrv.l.lw. of t \I.
W. shill he "is" of ..Iwar.r w t. 1"Ist tMrpt,
.hill 1. Orl•hiu. y• fir d rt r,. otuu no1.0 o y
/Yrl«..wt for • prl" of mt ere short •I. ts.W, .r y Mt)
Pots fir ." IYritaws.
OLIO mRiMl1.0 SIl11ATIM
ton pnPo, firm o umntlw vl11nln An of t1. vrwblo
d tuS W. su II to b...A pile, or ..pnt•sf4ur for
uCS An o p.I.'horroof Arlq Nlts COCA .111oolw'rtlw"
." suit M 0 =1'sobl. ts.r.fo " Mott[ Omud.
- nm maroon
it 1• o4.f.1 fCO 1, v".w fin to toWrFMIw, situ. n
..n \It «t. tMn[ttt. ntbn Is «Nola. to M r
1.1,1, to [ar Or ,A,Olt 4 N Arm. An loth t .ISIn r
41.11..A A. ski. W. 1. SKS r..n Ius t1. C. suit 1111 .-
bro t. ool .f Co. Ssevl.l. of sm. W..
n -u ARYrm mntuu
All rl «erl"1 Pobrb11. Atall.wr .d 1 "Il.mn •411 O.
.nrwtl Ir tho bllAln w(I' 1 for re or rtMA of l.st.m.
tlr pbr to otllu.tlw vlt)b t1. asp of this W.. 34ua1
r 41.In a <whnlnt N tm .tW.w. of PJtmlun 4Mn
t."It Iw -, . .,0r.,d to to Wool toot.. boos. sf Mir..
two or U.M.M. bKC11tIPo, W t1. thltd Sutd Our.
of OtrA.,J.. or alost .l.u., u.ntnlPo. of ..npb" .Mdtn
.Mll M "tr lost. nua.. Of W. I" 1o0m.A a•Wtl{
or urt, r M. .d 0rmn"r. Mv1tMUWn CIA 4nply.
.q w.rbl. rtlY .f fnullaiw..' 1sa1Mr. O.
Alts, 1. W wil"w "lot. or s1. I.uA1n tt111. .14 t..•
stlwto as anutas"a Mud'. Ill. is ufstr r, M Af..OPow
to its Mluln Offla.l.
M[tfw A. also 110 -11 (1) of r14 tl«trlul W. I..rMd to r.N a 411
DMISI 1t ,
IIAam cumin m nma
Se"ICO 110.11 (.) IS .d " AMW IUJIp Lllmiit.
A 11-aster. )ores Aircraft .hall to pnitta t. Svnl, Col, llthiln
. "1111 .r to Idl.fdo t first .nl:.m.. A 10•."11. yrar).troOl,
.Wool M pnutN t. Pons, 111)'In wrlot•. rwe"Kb Po11.t, fled
lnllsws, o u)lutlw " S.. 71. rots Poll, of if." ..pl-
.re" .vnlf"
by Cook tlrtalt Shill Art "Cori 301 sf our ISUn Of e1.
11.KA ooralt. no rosin of • Stml. fl." ."firms w"11" y M
ldlrldnl \rots .troth n..t rl ...W In.f t1. ntln .f t1K arcelt
4nn Ilwv she .Il ."Ibm. I'..\ tlealU uwlyd M 6.111n.
1nTw770.1 Its suit .vole rl, the rwnYCl. =list. spells" it
W .tla
;19 !.
i 0
6nt1. s. holes IM21 (b) of all [Infatest W. b read .. sad ,
fell.,
Na". !lass M mufmc,TTn ORNAaClo.
Irgnrp 11se6se, frill fw.. IIe41 fla. quit.., ... 1111,
alslL"net. like.". f.. a .. U41'. a.t...if..a, or
r .a., see "..1. wtlstf .\.11 N I ...... , u that r NId
Iep the flm Its I.. "..II fq.r I...s W. f
a feel. umrtl
els.anlr. Crow a .flit N tat seen. Iafala ." east ynA
I fen .roar I..uu ." tee sell sees..serid y slid at awl.
N semi, sells. TN ..11 as.er stream" y ft." far fbu.A.
.set .e faee•.1.tlIH Ns.etr..et.., fall N Ir1Jd I. IN f-frot
1. 111tH W 41.1..ra. A to..... el.f tall N ..Itnld as
.0 twat. We .use tae is seems. G ter t" net..rgntd is
save 1 ".. saplfnsl.y ..l.e .a. N 1.11derd as s.grsta
Iehas fn rLn. !.null. laJr." last .... Ill. 1. tee I .... ft..
I . At .[Nnv..alf rot N aafllrtd a Urfa aml,w
.,lets.
Iv.r.o. e.10. hall. lee.aa as r.nled [..p. "quest 11..
N, .f .M S. Uses. -.1.a. A. ft .. tall set N td ..
IA tee sell. galled eb of r. "seal. wtaa .u1P".Ilul .as
At la, ..a east estaNa.. ales .all N luulld N u. 1.Afrw
.A)... t. fa ass. leenlw N. it" (a).
Fee • .sae• fall, Mlllp,a lent w reeptu6 wtl, sa11 N feet.".
d ..Has..
a. lost .. reeaN..la wfl. aall Ar 1..1.11. N each Nsnnl N
it n..
M... 1. alb .alws at tee Halls.[ br .pall •ppilau, .0
. law'" MINS.. fall N rsetN r1uL [ IN uu.ltl
!wait ri s\a.M Lae
At bat .. aapu.. .tut call M Iefl.lid far M I.dp.
[t[11TIC1 as b. Isebly it that 1. u.gmnt as lulsr a.
I.�.. 7C Tr WI111a, sloe lfeJ" team's as .f. N.utl w Ia
Nal.s tat tar .ullul. b ., W134ly wnN.sa. • I.w1" assets-
,W. "it sal be rMlrtl.
... b .fb tee. I'M bd el.. Ml lip. ursa swtlp fee.
IiT �U nr ems. u W Inu11" ar [rose!,,... left) mpt.b WII
east N rMirtl.
ft" "Im 11. 1. A sealun rat I. A alt 1.. us.,. wul, aNr
awe, ..1.l Meet. • Intl" foan,.a. fan rot W iMittl.
As ..d b lets lntlw •'F.I, sate fall a rr,leetl •sap .4,
1..1.11AA (1.r Ile by Iwr.sa. ,bass.,.. W .blba pnuP.
He\ all aPa.. 1.. asa fast .u. call a Isrnd WISILVII)r atl
feeeusep fm etas .11 .NU. .use IN )Aar A sell .NU Wll N
I 111" t. feel". Iw a wee a ..f, of •sew (. . Case..) d..
sWn[n at see flwr Ilas. fha [ "st of able rMlaant If N Abu,.
la .se of ca". acme kaa..,A. slant,... Aa ..11. pnlee..
TN m "tab wtf." rrwud 1, tees N <tl. call M b."Illn as
.table uAl.... .. . b Hyfas feendlalsalPVS feet U.. teal lt..
"set. 6 lent. Clad., alf aerie, fltl. Is ."a by A Ill. Af Oawtlr.
ql. If). (a) an (A . fat 1.,
seen. 110.21 (. A[1D A,=, . wrolm AsSLSW4 Ill amrlro mwm
..re.
.t.
40.6 Ntary nveeap N Mn"N MSIIY .w aUll N aealld
r10 n hell thr enrN� L. Wya p elan. delisted fn... b
.1. Du one 1..111.1 It .Ulf M Nnllal 10 0..r rueatnl. fn
.0 fan V' .•r11µ yuu n f..1w Mrof. nnn1lJ y .
.loo .1u6. "1 on .11" an fallen in tMlr ml.tlb. tWltlw[
1. ntn • Ineq tell. Mln 1..11" M 0.01 "Itl1u{i van .N[r.
tN Mln null N raepl:d N each I "I'Mal aNruot anl.
.d WI I N w•sMna.lra"t. '
t. earn I.M.O.{ n. 4rµ1." So on Una .nn. tN our .f
rarv[s0o n. I.It .Ulf .n ease" I..
1. then nr•In n e.pen. n. aa,ar.ld .11%. nil ... N f...
I "1.Ilaul "r11µ •Pas der inewso " •Nrtna.. Soon., lean
.a. rup[nle out N N.IId I. eat\ Neap ...run ne..
bd .thin, I. neaNa[. dlh 1,. f. t n I.th 6. 1 owes.
1. see " fee on .•1 N .e+ p rumtncld deu0d u1111µ•
b mM1l .fpRd lea lM
&.if.. Ilals (f) MMIIC Am1}CtT To mulm . Wiwi" Illloc.
Carvell. W onto.. aneaup to .141. felt) 4.111.4 n lrNna,
suit be .it" .1'1 .elan. of ... Irwrlel n". mpnale . o
• 1'l t .to AA raiioal'. w " a a... ....... .. arpns
• r . 4. or 1plrn. out, M InUll" 1.
Inly. 1/4- r..tel ". 11nrlNtlw pal W
Ialwut ruptule toeless. wt eaadlp 3. Say N Nn.11d to the
lap ....In n raaa,ea N settle Ilan PI Iul1 wl N on.
1'.d as wnlµ to .1.1. sere). or .rN" ruptnlr ..pled b
0b Ind..
Sattl.. )hells 1'd twiner 1.t a1arAN.
A r.Nel1. Mld 0"I N ".lid I. All e.elNut raw.. .111 In
.rlerllwr ma W..pil.e.a I• Intend as .In • N.1' soon.
I., .Nit.
{Rea. nan (1) IC11r.110 ('+s oral.
A .."feel. Min .Mel N Lfealf" a eater ..h Nnol. N noon
no ,n \Ulf u Jones" a thus tt 1. setrealet. aItbrt tents, an
n., la. what wl N I.fald an au 1'0114 11.11 .".lit N
.ofd 1. the ruin at Issas. M .I.It.
staff. T $.Ill. 210.16.1' a. tin"k.l W. I. ..n1d a .s no fall.[
sun. 2)0.11 dOln.c nRILn ndl im.
dlhat•{ ptta. •Ulf M lal"1M N.,. p.tlfld salty.
fa) WHIM . Tme f. Irv. At lean w. tell .110 twt.1M
Lfthi nTil.[�i .1mneild .r nep
alrvgs. co' n 0. 1Ma .a. Nt4
t b unnN.. p.pq W wtMr mr•ra.
At Stott ..t headµ settles suit N install" to . file. ..)..•
floor .Nth. "Silly t0." .d Ua..t nun not der nan, n
cant-l"µ .plinth r.lrlµ s.nl"µ.
Itf "tm eat a seasonal. Teon. nu, hue %flow... NOrrf.
son st n rnpO"u natal" b . all "1t0 Wll N W.
.laid to It. of 1'0a1.t Mbn.
LlRRIO. p. 1. ullr.ry...ImN, .w at MI ®r not'. As
nwu, am.l. n wtwnl. tenets of 111Nb{ 'Ulf N smles".
3d
•to-
M Qra,,..b. Aa 1a\t w. MI nIIJ awl -tied 1!, led tall..
T•II <l ewIn11N rgta,b cull M deal %, 1. W,•
1. Media. .t .I, e111u xapKla.
r; (J Nl.lo Li Min G ae M 11, A<v,u�le h�.ilinLlbin.
apt v gaT.a. otu , p u le lied alt, .Tai{
i) •
W. of w, a1a.tN llgtt .nla
atrial to 1. \a[tN a<.....IJ 61111ga aping dn111.f otalpxW
\MII M I.f..11ed 1. weno IJM \.Null ," Stan wdagrowd.
Can..... gape... datlpN r.... h tan tW ., tent.., rI,
,hall Mae at Saint M Ilpl "Set for each A Falling ,aaa or
(nr-I. tu'lef. ewn.11" y • nw n.1 .r \MII M NM ..
f., an. fee but, ntpab. oN ... one.
•r 1. elan . light 1. .1," ,r ..J 1",1at prllq .rya am
Fell,% 1. fried 1. .ut a,".,.t far uJ lap at. MISS.
to IIgM w, M no . 14NIq ",gall mgbN y IM 1N,1-
1w1 ."rant .atm.
1' J. .tal. la. tW a light" w... pr partly .Pao M 1n-
added. aM little ." tM line .1'J .M II M axrfltN JJ
Wear ..ln.
p
). Ntn. toed.. v am...... I rvN N ,a . rail u an a
fen Wlalaal wile, spun fa. INlala.ol aura..... tM
It 1wt a Ilut Full M prided 1. let ...... ....rpn
.,.Co. ad I" oltl.r M ..old...IaI It. w. t w It. q.
} .la..
'Wed, tUll M a ml..tral .. all 1-1aJN hall.,.. L 1.111
oJpre," far the pr"n.
i4 f1) g I .a ,LMI"r . A nhJN 111M .nine W, M IrtW
M a❑ ,tarm— rotor. "I'll W nedertlear ..... Mar. q,IPalt
b In-1.lted ..2x11. tattletale %floating .. for raplr.
M ..for t
Said "arlcal Each it MnIJ wa"od y "ding MISS. 110.]11. Sued
a fall. ,
�. Mltl. 211621 IOG11C V m4c), elllnlr 2avR.rm m1m.
,aKt C".,. gel ...tha.gal....MI. M Iu,11N 1. and tar ..a
aryNa
of . ot.1-34a11J dx1I1V. Fatly <.u1.N 1. late un
,MII M baled w ew-1nN to Pnll inK...tUw of .q
1.In I <Ircvlt fn n1 Mgapaw).1m. u, .,Mr +alvPxy. to
d
It... tll all p, ll<.1e. of "1,% 1..x Ku..ltlo to tal .... .. a,1
than .m all all .,nit .Mil amly olotarlul ,tarp M sal
apava, M,xl tInNI 11lrIMa1,. pgaala FMIS nut M
qa totaled .. .y M.tr.., ..Flue. Ill.. n 0m
5 "
}b flan. J Call glac..,Ma w, IF Maly wNN t1 .Lied Section 210"21 I. reed
4 fnllw 211621 flGl aeGlln.
A -to elrnit gull M ]..aped I. • ,"nn rata... t. u ..........
�,•. 1x-11. at J. fn., .f eW <sur.1.1 ." ;Naww wryuq,
Seth. 0. goat,. 210,2 (1) 2.f aid malice Jd. I. ouni" 1. rW as fNle,
i M.,Iw 210-3 (b) 2
MKatwl. outlets 1.,uit" 1. W I,Jto suit t.. fled M not Lo
Iun vu.. .21 oaplbxe haKt -1mlb Nltt FM I .lu M n111N
.. np21...pnna wq ..e b 1M .U.. rag ,2MIS . n (Ir.Ma..
K11t1a.1 ..111 , "]lap M..% "Irl.. Suit N PnittN n "IF
Ixgbel .n..g b aaak.,Me ..
l I -
• 0
.It. I
Mltlw 11 Atiln 130-3 .f "Id t1 "tNI l te1. b roINN b Idiom 1tnt.
Sdnlmn III is r.N a fN lw.t
S"tb. 310.5 (1)
4t1 b131m wlt .L.11 I... 1n1.IlN 0...b .. INhId.N fwl.
It. burl IlmIt. 9.14 nmlt shell M pn11N alto,
I, Ili a, m VM wltq 1roOlN b t4 w31 Nptrt 1 tl..1"
t"tin 12. s..ala 2MIC (.) .f ws [I "trlul Cdr II I.rN.1 b "N m
fill.. t
6"tlw MIS 1.) AIDt[1S3 AIVO Nnllm IO.D3.
hdin n.1.ttn. 1a3 sn. wffltlnt Iy.[Iq 1 "b tN Iw
unN. L ro u" WII tN tsptN Iu1 .f • 4Nn M Irm
um tb .0 If Ib I.N. It W ",r\ ilm {U ",I" a Ir.
toY1.N IT not A If III. An1tl. Ift., .y .,II ... 1. I.M ftttm
".Ili" M rm. 1. S .r D M. Mn .ri11N .n' 1n. 11. 1
.yrr.. tgwiq. NIt1 nn Ii porn,
3.11. 13, 9.19 [{"trim; w. I. l ... 1r rorNN b .Ylm Snalw IIf.11
m W n bll wn
tmi.. 310.11
M-1. n Octu..roll., tW b, 0 .yll .n N ..M fn iin
It tw0.ttn., f.".n.e
s "tlro 11. LII tlrltolw fN. 1. 1n67 ..INN Ir 0.1"Iq It.
ubbl 310.10 ttrwlb 310 -11. rmr 1.11.
J "tin 1f. t "tlw'g ".f n1 tl "tqul Im. 1. wMN 1. m1 n bllenr
3mlw 130.13 Olson I¢IrpII 1U1 m Y A 11 a 3W.
S.M.. ntr.". .trxun .1.13 M Wt.11r4 I. Ittn4ro• Ylab
M
t µ JI.ObI. r".Ir"nb Of 131. IN. tenrly 1N tm Of W.,
ro1N US" •N II.It" it to. l.Ilwug rot o,
I. 11111 IYUI C 11
J.tinlnJt
•. Alrobs Iro jt .1.11 rot M roN (.I nnlml unto
mint. III.J.
0. Alwira rwblt .1311 .a N pN fn WII OO, unlit
rurwr•
1. SI.m11u1 "all. wo,",
Imoli ,
I. IlaonoI rou111t tdlm IYO rot bt vM .0n. MWra.
its " uuNM I. .Y1moil unlu Itq nunw.l..
1. tltttrinl rom;l1< IIIbi .1.11 rot bO nN "s.4rpwy
unln mrlrol ntmJ.
J. Ylrrro"
s. Aui; l.rr Mtn.
0. Rigid 010- 1.3111 f .l.
32
d 0
[tames,
I. 8181d r- [x.111[ tonYlt Shell got "• a too .odil..d
Imlte of rear ..keel.
4N.wd
M1. Mldenl I..W" xgul -4Kkl" C.I.I.
iKtin Id 4[tsdo 110.)} ([) H ula [I.elrlool 421 1. egged" to rood &1
falwgt
t Kllr 110.11 Iq 1euY1a,.
'4 unln dkeetrxtln mug eW l M toga" n W .....In .I
M wildly IT the [unit of. W I."ly .KK.Iar poor a MK.
-w gonlu .Model. voter W b11Uq.
=!"Im,
,a wildly. .f . e.rnl \I n IN. ... let 'm Wt n. r,edlb
rM./n mmaker ml lr Lelt[."da Null. ale wildly If ..,IN the rd-
of t\. .miy Kllalss 'ek". ar[e.l.. Mpg M.
el" In a
Solid. wild,, .11 M a
ImelN 1. • ..K\. ""III m-
vulll.. W rmIt W ppan or nkq or too .mlu [Wtml
tot. loo wlldl.l .. gall Ie.
CIrmO. I'll
OnM1FG
feeder n. l.etlr 118 -10 .1 .11 tl.traeal W. U .uNN 4 n" oo hllw.g
lxtlr 110.11} e101k01w [aa11uo[.
M ..r kt. of . [,.rdlol el..trsN .agi,enr go . pesdked
gaKtM..Met be A. .1 .."III ......tole pim W 1. . gekme
loot vat ..... od....m eN W."I.. leaked. Mm mnoop
IT ..em. to11 fn ..rood filly Ketn K" go • 1KW1[f ae<tn1..
afKR.o l..dle1 gull to p.adN .rod ,...loo" Jet'. W .K-
,an.. .rod .n oral ml loot 1. likely IT to dl.gorK,N fn
.pan or ifyl.egmot.
CITiiOg Till
r.l¢too.fcs
1..e1r If L" [IKnloot We It Met,..00dw by way fmllr M.11 &1
lexlr 1&1.18 mll" 11321.
U7 2.11..I.1pm I..."1" to pn. aqb full, d.gltl.l.
gull No.. t11 .eg aeearlegMeeel.. 1.o&1Itiol n Imld .AIe11 n ellnit ool..
y t J.. [papa, I..K11N IT .ono tgrg,ol, m IWml.l
toW M goteI... too. 40 gook... d
Sortie. Id,.lt.r ^fMer
&1.mp too11 w ere I... tl.n 1. aK .tell toot MK. [man
.Walt or 4Nn ngml 1. Cooked.". too .p10
vq a.11 w 1-11r.
le7 ,MKS W wM."gn .K"y INl.ld..l ran of odIl1.I.
full, dnllly..wtl ken eg rpKip of mt Ire. gW IT
good... 4N.Il for ken IMK..kell w d.t Ian tW 1.
\ go.
1.
0 0
.I3.
6ttlr It. 611 1 .... 1..WMrNr grelN .41.1 1.11. 341.2to .1 ., f1 y
6.tlr )M-it p.G s=',
Io m. W t. 1..U1 AgtlleP. too (7) abu•.rnn l.tt cu..
.,or .,.MIg for "or. ....411 k tm11N fn .a[w lnlllq mlq
p. rp�1.1 fm too pp Ik.N l. u atu.,ltl. Iw.11w 1. too .tll.
W W 6 m .....,111. 1"'1' may t\. If.,. w.n .Itkv y.c .
b rl .1.1101. 6"... of rtt.4 of'w'mlm..zt 1.rgl.., W of
.Per I.r..' gull k u •rtror4 y M k1111.2 Offltl.t.
enwYl Is
.Iota: ml
$'Im 70. kttln 340.1 of gala tlrclrlul W. 1. Od 111.N.. 611M1
load. 710.7 OSLO RItlOTSLD
crop -Ill., m ....l.tlmg gull k'roll'" m gnn. of IN wry.
rowel .' 1.0 6r .oig,wo o wlolroni mMislr4. II
M6rr Iapl1.0 w11.
S.tUm 71. 6ttim U&IS N .11 [Ircttlt4 W. 6 ! y 41.tN.
ircllm 1l. 1.11. 334-l.f gala tlr4rinl 41.6 ..m1N l. 1.4., f.11.wl
i.ttloo 34.-3 tilts R1tI1'i[0 w w RI11R}ft
Tlpa gol M K cowl., gull N'nlnN 1. k .gN b r.,llnrbl
.. W b k1111.o kll.G.' l auapy b
4.111.{ m1,.. Mpt uuftt. 14 flood E31 a11.., b
GI TZES W. Tle tm of goo..,[411..'.'W poi. 6a11 k
p TN N N l.m11N to ktt ..C.N M twp1N MI
1...y.111 Iy bu[Ir.. It .611 k pr.IfgUp p lartgl
.r if" taw WWI. 1..1r TOl6 6 Y.wv1 Moeb o fit.
wM M.n r.t o.11. .re got d, pe W o .+1... l. nn..lw
rl.tor o 1..0..... LM 1.I !awl. gu1I got N l..t41N Moe.
.,lout 4..m.I. tog..' r.M.
to) TLr K• IW MC idol. gull k RnInN to kit ew.N
Mt I. I1., rbl. Iq. o prnabr Ipulw.
.N b Ur rib .f M46 W l..1...it. of rg.gy tart
IT tale.
W t... got n..l[1.1 4r RMrr gw n rot. Try. M g4 l.t
I w p tg- yw. uM.. UI k
Logatl�to) I..' kltll.tklpohN to w .1.<rlg..tjolo
nmtwtlw. UI I. tglu U.o oa•1 tog... (.)i. m.gtl.ua I..
tlrl .1 1.... ........ (1) fo t ws
hro. o wnlr..f .1,
nit. 3.," .to.r 1 .Idl. W unl.i n /NlrIWl doell•
.Ip.N l. w4ulyl awl. o
toe N.onl.. (q wy nk4N 6 r.e.y..m[M. o fill . yr
.Ito o• 110) Hoe rm 6 W Ile <uug 1. troy o tsrr.b
r aw.,.1 .IM (l .,ln o Wlln flelgw.
src[k. 21. 6ttlm 334.2 of .11 tlrclrinl W. It to.y Ial.t'.
/ptlo. R. Ittlltg 341.1 of nN tlrcof.,l W. It goo4N 1. g.4 ., f.11owl
-?4
1
0 0
N<ll.o 31414 rnammo
IIYUN on1.1 iW.t NI NYN .. n.WNI Nm w.r. Wt
t4 Io.blt W W frill. . ... .M for I
Im"Im,
3. A
YIN. "to) YJvlt on) M ..1 f. pow9111 If tN tofll
is .r
nor (V) . N.,. It I, ..row'" I. fltll... ./Into
to, lt. I..rl..t W to. 11 .1t I.n, I.. s..uonl tMnl.
.. Inl.itw f1 ..Yrrnt 1KlYC 161W it 30 otp.ron or .Y.
3. M.M. ::,.to e.Wit r N now h. 3r.onlly y tN ...f
ridgy. wilt ttrW NU t11 r..R.l...1 o..rt ..
f1YOl. l..Arlt.
WIS.. lt. IKIIw nail of .H nK.,Iul W. N Nny won1t1 by Wly lto
blbMy NotuYlw (lit
Notion 330.33 (p
..o .tw in r.p1r", /lrt•)ttLlrr "m .NII y of metal or
otln .11r.M Iolwb.tltL osww..
1tt11. 21. 1'1.N. f10 W 01 of .. 91.111.1 NN I.YI.I.I Gent.
late I.N. .11winnol .-91.11. W ...Nt1w vtltl. Inl. 11.
Nf.y 1.I.ted.
Ligon al. MR., 1. M.Itt W Nfotl C.4 lo11w. I79..3 W IF.".,.
. ill..) w1. Rt rot111[.t1Y. 1. rN r+.oya..rt. of two ropLtlon.
olPM I.w.t N NN. W N(.) C.I. N.". 17II2 a It /.tnlon. to N
...onoAl ..n.ry ten. of lo., f ltlon.. W r
ton ell, feral, .1 W
city . of Anne SuonoO 4N..l... ttot W cllflYtlw..v tent W.I.
..o It Net romtlY r...ry W., of IKOI r.Jlllwo of .. ftrtA .on
N1y Nlw,
o. It It vtmty ..anury. toc...r 1.1 c..11tiwl, t.
Wry oM .;/ln.wt Mill. on.f tN Mole.l t1.t111.1 W.,
it's ultlw, Nt11y .. .61w.ntlw W wfeno..t If
.Nn to Ironll* fir fnu.. W .NYy q.Ylw of U.
YI111., .M 4Nt/ tll.aw.
t. It N i..wt11 tit up. W... of 1.1 <on,mws, in
Wly W nor .ntlw U 1.1.. no. Ail, 31.. 1. .1.
l.. 130, o.N AN of to. .lion., 11.tr1<tl IM., 191i uttN.,
1. .41 In pn11t I., IKn..w .Incul.l .w fl. of",.
Ittonl.orlon of YR.". to .Nnco. wiNtl. W 0000n)
It .I.t N.1 /.totlaloot.
I. It 1..amty .....o, Mt.Y of IN.t <walon.
W If) 4lit .f M of tons IYll.l 11KtNU FN
.
III, ultlon. poll., •111 I.it'nd ,,ti of ..nl <•'ong, t
W IK.I. of ..nl. oNllNtt W .m.. Nnwfb/. N
.Nn to .lorry tM .l. .mirl. tN 1". of tN Wo.
1. It N nomtt/ o...ry. W.. 1 .3 .wlltlwo. .
WAY lb IS.=: Il.tll.l fain y WIUw.f WIS.t
..4%.M 11.•11 ..N.r to paft for f..n rw,oa.lon.
tf21.IR2...I.. W Ir.r.aon d.wlwoR. to
IIKtIlu1 .tntr. L..pllont.
NIt W Rry W Iflutlw of .to felt .1 ole3tM or t1141 ell, Co1al Nt
6. t.alaN Nun. IN pvltlet. of 00 3.II.1kn1 Wt .. I.JO.vty
So WIt idn` I" .�tot.t.l of Wltt, .fly W vlf.o of tM 2.. 111 pAllt
opbDtvlle. of t4 1.INNi W Nf.) Ol..iw
* 9
.lY
tY �... tltaM nPnW fl.u.t. Vl/ M ..Y w11Mr n .
/.DIY marl �./ � rT �IfJ, tM ri /fYatMH bn.rf. Atl1
�e MI[ Y /IY IIO IL �rllgy Ir/ Lfr!) Nnfa
YvM �. b ptI qua /►l. ant /I Y b
W Mtt tar tar +r Y M IrNl�r/r N N dl• MNry
tw �/I brt IYI rlrl f/M • artlflrt � W NI-
R X10 b lfW Ilr.rtrr{ N t`rr1Y W t>ritl Orur)T
ttlilJ. 4rip p LO1L OIr y N
U
fTir3i ,
Y16:
IROft
IltiSit
H E N 0 R A N D U H
DATE: Februar•; 15, 1979
TO: City Council
IRON: Lauren H. Wasserman
City Hanagcr
SUBJECT: Storm Drain and Systems
Development Fee
As you are probably aware, the Advisory Committees have recommenced concur ence
with the staff's recommendatior. to establish two additional fees on building
The first is a atom drain fee of approylmately $3,000 per acre on all new
development. In addition, a systems development fee will also be proposed. The
purpose of this fee is to help offset many of the costs which are incurred by
the city which are a result of development, particularly those relating to
-treat improvements The systems development fee is proposed as an additional
tee of one percent on all building permits. Lloyc Hubbs, our City Engineer, has
prepared a rather detailed report and recommendation which will be included in
your City Council packet.
We have met with building industry representatives to review the proposal The
builders, while reluctant to increase costs, do realire that the problem+ of
Rancho Cucamonga are significantly worse the:. those experienced by most otbet
communities, particularly in our area. We understand that the posit!on taken
by the BIA to to not formally oppose the atom drain fees, but to oppose the
system development fee.
While we are discussing fees, we still have one fce which probably should be
looked at by either the Co•acil or by the Adviso -y Committee -- that to our
park development fee. Unfortunately, there is no provision in the park
development fee to provide for dedication in lieu of payment In addition,
there is no provision for increasing the park development fee as the cost of
land increases The situation that we are new faced with in that the fee being
levied to probably tnadeq.mle to provide for both acquisition and future
development of park sites The present fee is $300 for single family residences
and a lesser amount for multi- fapfly and mobile home parka When original.y
establishrd, the fee vas n:,t based on the actual cost of land, but was arbitrarily
act up by the interim City Nanbger.
The primary purpose of Lifts MM is, first of all, to let you Raw that we
have a problem with the park development fee. And second, to suggest that
Council coy wish to refer the matter to the Advisory Commi!tee for further study
and recommendation. We will leave the matter up to your beat judgemr•rt If
you wish to pursue cur suggebtivn, it would be appropriate to discuss the matter
at the some time or just after you have considered the systems development fees
and the atom drain fees I should point oat that, in our view, our fee
structure is where It should be with the possible exception of the park develop-
ment fee. We anticipate no additional fees or changes in the present fees for
quite soma time. It is not our intent to overburden the developers awaver, we /�
•...7 I
do feel that fees should support she services provided. As in the case of
park development this Is simply net oceurri g.
1HW:haa
�� 4
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEHORANDUH
DATE: February 21, 1879
TO: City Council 6 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: CAPITAL DIPROVr,1UF PROGRAM SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT AND STORM DRAIN FEES
For the past few months, the Engineering Division has been working with the
Advisory Councils on the development of a five year Capital Improvements
Program for street and storm drain Improvements The primary results of
this works to date, is a recommendation by the Councils in favor of the
attached Systems Development and Storm Drain Fee Ordinances The Advisory
Councils recommendation followed from the obvious improvement needs and a
lack of sufficient revenue sources to begin to improve systems to handle -
future growth.
STORM DRA14 ORDINANCE
Both Storm Drain and Systems Development fees have legal sanction and his-
toric precedent embodied in legislation Ruch as Article 5 (Fees) of the
Subdivision Map Act (Section 66483 of the Government Code, see attached
copy).
Provisions for this type of fee indicate that the fee shall be based on rn
adopted Master Plan System. The fee for any property should not exceed the
pro rata share of the amount of the estimated costs of all facilities within
the area Utilizing this criteria, the proposed ordinance adopts San Bernar-
dino County Flood Control District's comprehensive stern drain plans 1 and
2 within the City Linits of Rancho Cucamonga and declares that the feet will
be fairly distributed on the basis of benefits on property throughout the
City.
The proposed Storm Drain fee has been calculated at $2,500 per acre based
on an estimated systems coat of $38 million and a total developable acreage
of approximately 15,000 acres. The drainage acreage excluded existing street,
storm facilities and other public lands from the total City area. Of this
15,000 acres, approximately 6,250 acres of land are currently developed.
To construct the full system, it would require a fee of over $4,300 per acre
on the remaining developable land. A fee of this magnitude would be taxing
new developed properties for improvements which benefit older developed
properties.
the estimated revenue from this fee assuming 500 homes and 30 acres of com-
mercial- industrial per year would be $500,000 or $:,500,000 over the five
year period. It will likely take in excess of five years to complete con-
struction of one mayor drain. Higher growth rates would excellerate the
collection of funds.
City Council d City llget e
Page 2
February 21, 1979
SYSTEMS DEVEWPMENT FEE
The Storm Drain fee will be limited for use exclusively for the construction
and planning of storm drain facilities. In addition to tremendous drainage
needs, the City is facing an estimate. $10 million in road construction needs.
Major arterials such as Grove Avenue, Hellman Avenue, Baseline, 19th Street
and Archibald Avenue are all in need of widening to handle Increased traffic
volumes. The City also has needs in the near future for a minimum of 16
additional traffic signal installations or modification. Without additional
funds generated for these needed projects, the City will be creating =Jet
traffic congestion problems and potential safety hazards.
Attached Is a copy of the streets and highways five year funds projections
and a proposed five year program for Capital Projects. It can be seen from
these figures that Within the five year period, no major public works pro-
jects can be accomplished with current funding resources. Unless additional
funds are generated future growth will be seriously constrained
The City currently has two major sources of revenue for street purpose: Gas
Tax and SB 325 Gasoline sales tax In recert years,
seriously eroded to the extent that no City can do more the gas [ax has been
than maintain there
existing systems with the funds. Thr budget for street operations In Los
Angeles is the same now as It was 30 years ago. Unless the gas tax is
chr.. god in the near future, these funds will no longer cover the costs of
routine road maintenance Funding uncertainty is further hampered by the
fact that SE 325 funds are cuoj to to being claimed for transit needs prior
to subject to to suttee for toad purposes. In the past, these funds have been
subject to lawsuits and leglelative attempts to require use for transit
facilities only. One such legialativa change is being considered currently
In the State Assembly.
The uncertain condition of roadway funding taken with the great needs for
roadway improvements in the City make additional funding sources mandatory
It Is proposed that the Council establloh a Systems Development fee of one
percent (12) on the building permit valuation to be collected with a buildi.g
permit issued with the exemption noted in the Ordinance. This could be ex-
pected to generate $500,000 on $50,000,000 of buildin,
would be a moderate growth rata substantially lower than previous year g valuation. $50 ; 000,000
and
somewhat lower than current activity in the Cities of Upland, Ontario and
Chino. Given this projection, the City would begin to me et Its current road
needs by the year 2000 With the absence of each a fag, the City will not
meet road construction needs.
FEE'S AND LAND UEVEL]PMEHr
With the Inclusion
lettions in the City ffor eaStypicalaresidence arewlisted belowifeea, fee col-
City Council 6 City Nal@6r •
Page 3
February 21, 1979
Building Permit
$
611
Parks
$
300
Schools
$
700
Sever
S
300
Storm Drain
9
833
Systems
$
600
Beautification
S
400
TOTAL $3,744
This figure most be considered within the context of urban land economics,
community service capabilities and the development process. It would be
erroneous to consider the fee in isolation from these other factors In that
they have offsetting characteristics The value of land 1s directly related
to the developability of that land and the availability of services. Lands
with serious natural constraints in terms of grading, drainage and roadway
improvements will cost considerably more to develop than Tans not fa-:ed with
serious problem. These problems will tend to lover the value of the land
and produce a higher demand for the types of improvements constructed by the
proposed fee structure. In the case of the proposed Storm Drain and Systems
Development fee, the City is recognizing that each developmen. in thr City
creates additional demands on city systems that are not related directly to
their particular property. Recognition of this fact in the beginning allows
the Community Development Department to deal vote effectively with problems
created by development not directly abutting the property.
An example would be the completion of a major subdivision north of 19th Street
tributary to Archibald Avenue. These developm.,nts will cause the need for addi-
tional street widening in older developed sections of Archibald and Installation
of traffic signals at Archibald and 19th Street, Archibald and Church, Archibald
and 9th, Archibald and 4th Streets. Under currout procedures, there is no way
to collect contributions to these system improvements Increased traffic on
Amethyst Street between 19th Street and Baseline has created a need for side-
walks for the protection of children attending Alta Loma School. There would
be no contribution to this problem by development.
In the area of drainage improvementa, development of properties along major
natural drainage areas tend to concentrate, accelerate and increase runoff onto
adjacent parcels This problem is increased by added runoff from lands being
developed tributary to these natural drainage areas upstream of the parcel
being considered for development In the absence of a fre structure that re-
cognizes general responsibility fee drainage problems a single property owner
can and has been faced with drainaee improvement requirements that make develop-
ment of his property impossible.
The proposed fee structu.es, therefore, are merely a rocognitlon of general
responsibility for infrastructure improvements through wt the City and divides
those costa to all beneficiaries on an equitable basis. 'The drainage needs are
fixed at $38 million and the roadway coats at 10 million. These needs do not
change in the absence of fees only the method of paying for those needs change.
41
City Council 6 City Nan* O
Page 4
February 21, 1979
The Engineering Division feels that the arterial roadway systam and the Nester
Plan of Scots drains are of ganeral benefit to the City and that the increased
need placed on those eyatems by future growth should be borne equitably by all
new development through the proposed fees.
It is recavcnanded that the City Council concur in the recommendation of the
Advisory Councils and adopt Ordinances 53, 60, 61 and Resolution No. 79 -10
adopting Stop Main and Systems Development Fee's.
ReseetEully subm�tte,
L /�• u
L B NI78BS
City Engineer
LBR:deb
attachaents
42..
Ge `-5,E°
7 �• g E_ x yy.L C w'S9 V$..°. � E° a .r e T t.. i- gg '° y
�8 E �n� ".'u7 ua -Gn Y�' >' €e.• '�� � °'�':: � E i � � ° D�i q £ v
v•EY 'EX c.e
Nw : -a � a T n -•-� 2 ps -' c`i B� Lt c• � c a '9
:s na' 8�•.c:� `-L.38 "Er "iEo. $r �V•L .i^ •° -��.°. D- pi.3�Z �•�cN =ayy
AE °e
$� uE �7En� i'as oT E$ =° =Lae °sJin °a
:95P ya- Xs .= zce -eea'. osE �E .`a-•� rs�a s 3 v�7`2DeEi.'S
° eE 928.9¢,8 w.°. E'�'f g$ag 0•y.a.. c9 L3'3 Xv`:e a ,s5 2'E ' n.5 ajy9-K n
='�"�_ �'CCCn °n�?Gs°..•OSeos a ru•i £$_ °'� -e E'cC � -=a` '
9 yo D v�•2 +e n „s.a- .. •aQ.e 3'= ° -i a... �w 7y �! �$��
�2 E D• 5L'
�e° uE .Ee,7 a 5e'- o� w$.E _ .Qr .s s SY'E''E [a • 9i e E = ° En° Yn.
eLt w �`n w _° Lj%r$aw[c' v � eE,• C
° au
`o `'•'o. _ � c��E us aL 5.1v_�nv'�. y' ac c� -n D'°z'.E'L E
'O
e. n 2 L.vwe•C Lew° eVV��t5 ` ^�a v.ee a xCEE
,uea e� ��
a.2 Y°. Fc .�O.O „'i �an .7E h'•C ^:c •^ -E= F 72` zi ,°c •`-
° a$ EEn'S c° g `o a 'a woe si•u'pp o``u• co -`oE
+Dp ._��. -0 7. ...; ss°x e'E °•°es� `e'is �`Ge•eE �.S.YC ".4''�.E C- e:3' -�'�
aff �8 OtD`o Xo9 °�ES•e:. Yilcg °033 03 awgA3E'ie
ula `o ^.°g gi a= 3JE• €g'ea ,xE OCS E'�E o'..
Vsise. a 'CCE o� °yyyyEB aD�Q�i�a �� 298
e ° .e'� ii Y .3 a 4 u 4 �' S .c•i
fl n § y e n C•5
D a
2 2g Lyr E v.'J FI ° pY
yy - I
op wEu3 �E u5 �- LsuSe'$Q Yi u E - n-- E
e g•..
u, i. C 8 q� e 5 r s Y E E ._ g ° s_ g a n o M ° •- r 8
w �° ° ,7 c ua $ ° i "•eEaD>•�N..zO.s€ eE
aes y�ne 7rTe re.
c `Ee�V� „^• nL'$-
�:`a.s
a 2.9
5c
J 'y ^• o .� e.7a�t�7 'ru °u �E '� o e° .Y.53 •� g°
wZ`u XN °£w `e� �•-�v� =..�q E�u'>.n �� iC .-°c $-' n
Q n.� °•5 eo 2� F' E e$ n•_ 3t u.�°. o.t 5,° �' E Y•_w n u "_ w &_
- :E's s E Eeu �Y EO .r °e'� °C,''
��•�[` G'.e � ° u $ u° °n " v� ys � S•T'j°"c n`n �.�.^sLE ..• w E°'•cy r�
`
�.£
°�si%E�E`E(j.9�`c 5�+:5 L'9Eiy,a°e�''2- eD�c6'a5Z m9� '`na
c
�w .- $.�. °C �”' =3Y ..YF eS' ° =i3 �Lue�YsavJ : �•`:a�
a o. a'�`E
LL
75
w
J
K
wi
°
o,cv
n ^D$
s
'Y •e y0
gam, e�
n•ao
v
>•6 uE.
aa�o
.°.EE
4"S
G-
c °' =o �' Re: �t D O C c �.E •5L °c.�e Q ^s$ g`c' �aE �� �.e •� C$pvE -^c^
v Es'
�,• p c- E9.9 ac?aE 4.
E•- _ ��E E= c� gum n�°•�ce e o
cc%as hna '�' rEZ'• -- '= �c�+
Ec ae'c e• °U�E'D- = ec$yae° u° 4
—Ei� Ee EC `= Ei45 le e�_�.°!w^ ` 3 tf' -�,v °�y_�a_$j°, �,°c.•a:; Ln
=•e ° �• yo ^c i• C aa • 'Ep 2 EL�o°•�e �E dr°w F3 �c8E a _LC• 3 n �" 3o i •�° e^ @aa = �'?= `d'L g cV` Y_ = �•r° •. B^ 98 c
n Y n ^u=$ a f E c `e E e�•. nc a = L a
C n 2 e p e
v p• r4c Q
r
••c� �� Cy �•u C. .2 rJ aE c��a .occi3 ter° Caaboe
a ��rr O .� a p�
E -� Es E�j .? `o.� Q c•a p OAT- �'E Y' p c••• d•••a ao� n�'s vp.5' n`o
D oT wt� y9Ee'`�:2 EE 4^ ��:�rh T- 4:9.x° � =n.9 n2`E'E C�aA YS Sio•=i 'p2'cs
w n ($1 t •' s e T� '- .x E as a E 3 L L` E n'8 Y 3 ...._ .°• > o -
E C•Y� °°• °0...9 =9 LL,•n a•q `o CJ- n n° Er
�rc -p4Oc q q a{t°s- Fr�z „�o.cee
o� c gg o._ gq a n9 8 E.5 n •• °u E`Q a 'O ° _ n5e
_ ac `o y x = '� C•• 9 a c mu n E a' n C a < ^ ° n.- F cy
v._. •w.y.5
.�9 5'�L9 '7aeeC �3� �•'rii €e... n9 a `4p3 3 Tye w ° E a
3 c
:•• n- or Ba =° c ^ oL•e.58ppy=yp °n a cE`^Li9'vi_$.t.n u sTy
< gc )•9• y— •8 c.4 C yc•`or y°dx 8� C�r� 6 .o° e`.cE c e cam_ o e
c €.cE $e F e5c• 9 e V .c w �^ .E3F `oe *4�r E2.SE ^-
mcx'22 4 x9 aG 8Z�ot••a Cs °Y�St•e `.p ^'gE ^e y.t -3i8"•L Cc 7a. -••3
'{.'. ar s3.3 cE n• -aLC o -•- E.E .cE n,t�"s ° =Cc Pi •• °
c•y `o 'u n- . s •a�
-e, S!A o. See,=, Q•9na�eE1QeQ =.!f:; . °oy, n ° ° ^siE V`c pE D`o•�gnc'o. q•O.9
Bao`o nnY.Ed Canw .q r. -I a9E 3'03 e`r°.t rx.�4 -wu?U �x=E.
u T
^•^�o � `6 EGn.9Y L`d s .`o•�ss r'a u S. L•� E Q`u'
�9X z e 65$�
°cg Zgg'U-{C eyy C5 ^ ° n 9 yo C r'1 5 e '� `'+yc g•`o 84qG y
4 E a� ° E'x s C gt'
`oN a v Q
°`•"s95cy�5x °E
•
i.x e�r'0p'•°, cC a v °E•B.R Tyaov9 &L`o
•� o.�a a L-`o �'c _
°
=` o,`
°•r t�11"'9 Vjn V Xa tlSr'�C � °iyq` i�w h
T° �.Y��9t2 a 2..b a ^`°w•�C -•E y `�j Vl x �i6a eg y5�y' •5 M °1
E .wx_oL C yyE_� 0 �c� tee., °• -3'g 9`L'u aeaa E„ =x�5 u
^ErTs �EaS' u� 5L'
"cif =�sX- 3v� 9�iTE �y?�ve �eev E."9. y 1
__ e d u va
b.=' FL-. •'1-'g X a”{ _ . e 6'>p` �• u v a ar •e'y' • n E a s`3 3
�`e �EE'c.exJ r4•�
5.4 u ..� 4 .. ° Va p o^ E •E ='t_ 3 C �v o. y o E a ..
y.9 .a5 L,Gc� �'n �2Yr�aU•`' °ig.e9 uv��a.u8 ze_a°•= 9 E:.� moray
Eoot: yewE.L92EC E�X$•�•a °'3•S�c' =�` 5e•�yD .•• °- i�'[�E^ C7
E�� o ti &� E'T7._.".y p@ e v 2 c '�,
�e C8 r = �` ELF E Y`v : -'E ' SE yv_vy y4T v
••°h Eyt•?YnXeS= PL-'-E bn•E��L'�,�E$2`+iT macro 2t °.Gt°' ,v gc� -�f y
e =i yL 2.T.0 v�- �`o,'o�6Ea 6ww ^cav= •<'•6�a ayst••.�{`oi
3rr rt n.� E• 7 w q ` p t ` c n e t �. E Y u`
ye dET v "c n eL` -` b_�e•o Lr
iLr E e., —ga xasCi �4 aza «2�P`
BE ^.9 `o:�6L -J Yyc' �.�CL`.9n .^. o'°•`a �, g:!.q a-�•OVVL` Lir L,' =�L
E�••B+w ,E._� a0 E.e5 �u u ,•`_�- H Vi c'`'7•""'L o•�•gE
e q.. A a s c E: o �
A US ^Y V.•Vw ., E`CVO _' `OL'n n nf��CY
0 0 B,5 4
Z 1 C.
c u h x t E -:0 a � T 6•_ E u �'C �
E •a `q'c3 v. Z.4 u w.g 'O c�'Cv8 i i Ya`ua 5� o ^9� �
u`2 as; •'c ='J 2O�E `aEt nS _ - °� v� Li.yy
•.I C._.O e C y
'S v i, °e� •_ 2 u..E °. W ? u'D 4 E.1ci `' ° `_. Q yi C'.°, �� 9
GE. _oYE •c Z, v -L,cE
a s E 2 ' n a
;t ° •a.8'7 D ut n
.9
Ecc w2
i y• c
>e. c.. Cn. c.0 2EE '� oa a•�SrJ°a �y �..' -.E Ai.�L''�' =•=S €D c` ne,�•�
•° E nr°• E �� D= €`�° 2 c L n ° a' �U.,` 9 u ^w_ �` ; w E� r
V--5
^Dn cc sc 'Y.Y°.0 >,w
gcg9C EU �•=..YSe =c�` J�. =c °c9 CE'EE c.Es ia- a'-•i �r°�EL§ •so rw�.7
E F- a-££.•v E rY `oa eng `"v Ea •°�
.�+•v`c a D V.e Z.a €c� E C u d °v uv e a t`
n� E°VSf n �_��_n D e nnw 8'e -• D ems• ^'E '+�
E v r a Y 5 ^° J �• Q L C G y 'J L_ V A= .Y X 2 2- T n
�j ^neia ae >; F' ..O°rP. c�YE r$E e r .x Ya.cZ
( _yo €`o e o c p EE w`c 9''-'_.'• < °wcb
nE Lie 5 .�._�r2 Cc9£ Y 7r, E
c a ;E � O pt.r u 4 o Er °o �C v yE" 6 o.E Cg c�C. g eX
0..35• E �'- `u' D i
• -9 `a D.g ��c ;;z£�� a 6.�9e ;(o`Ei ..an`E:3 y^ �$ Y r•°
z `.V E Y Z.
�=6 y�gg % f• G nN9 _q'ti ° •E� -'6Y eJ -� g
e 5 Soro� w7 D�Ei �3 °E ai�E'vw E :a2 E9°2 $ XwSaaac
,St,o`o`o CE E"Eg
n
s c e§ E•i
g._ n �
-3 E �y = -c i.3y C � � •o Ea� ° € ew a o •° a c __ u vo
pC n^ L sL'g °o'x E._3� o �6 0. wu cEEYp SE oa
E"'�. C 2 e " �... 6 3� C Pi C 6• y O L
9 °�` s °7.a °:b a °E ?-5 EaC �^ a o•GunA'C...°..E_E.BE r
w e u '! a�-�c� ce G E'- ii � E•- E �u a e .�$ •9
n:_._ y9 a -.yy_ n G u H E'. `d e.� E _ i• a ?. I c9 G 9 a
c'`yDc i„E
Co e c e Es�oEr= .�.•a.x=
c e o 'E D r.�t9 G -'L °.rOr •- 2EL c.e
Da n.3 E wy_ ��� _s C� se °$• -$ of
v.4 °r D a a �= sE .9 r 'y aG cn e8 e9 °n
n�i.E ^ °ce Ee `�µeoc ce •s .. L7y�eJ G�Enc w „O n.. S�`o `u2 ���,c
cGne -a.4 ,4 c�'c C�I = ..r°.
c o•'w of i• c�'E -Ca Ea � c s.na °= 2�S�eWF nG•-o„ w_wc Y.r .a.e °.0
�rc y
uQrc •� V a°3t .2c =�uJS`o eke L E Ecns e �5n 5y r o
i° � _ C-'-nr E�..2�u� <,e
° -Di --n °�a.e
U•'Dc bb.° E`w E- 2iiae. vv u�'4.X •;a`.2_ °r 28 n
&n 3 0 c•n- c°'' -C c•-C $-- °n LE'a �o E
y V ••qqy 6V LEC ACY C .S vV Q "�er.0� C °-• Cr n
'w 'v G'S uCCi oc•_ge nr.t�D= °�.�'..Y°. °sae
E Z cZ'c E 9 F c.�a E ° ^v4. END• -`r �E Barr. <o�T
`:.E �1 it El—. - n.8£jE •3� En ESn��Y. 3'�nL.E co fa �L' >i 2•c &E�7' � 2G,(/
/ `4
• 0
STREE'iS AND HIGHWAYS
FIYB YFNt FUNDS PROJECTION
TABLE I
78_79 79_80
Gas Sex $380,000 $40,000
SB 325 440,000 375,000
Federal Aid Urban 70,000
Subtotal $820,000 $885,000
Normal Haintenance 380,000 500,000
Capital Improvement $440,000 - •$385,000
Funs Available
BUB Block Grant Funds $250,000
County Budact $ 150,000
Carryover
Estimated -CIP Funds- 2.573,000
(5 years) Available
BUD Fund - 250,000
Funds Co ®ittee to - 700,000
Cucamontta Creek
(Estimated)
Funds Committed to - 400.000
Deer Creek
(Estimated)
80-81
$462,000
400,000
70,000
$937,000
550,000
$382,000
81_82 8283 8383 =_84
$486,000 $510,000 $535,000
425,000 450,000 450,000
70,000 70,000 70,000
$981,000 $1,070,000 $1,055,000
600,000 700,000 800,000
$381,000 $330,000 5225,000
223,000 Available Funds for
/ Maintenance 6 Construction
Projects.
C'LIUt� �'ya
1 4i,,
1'
�fJ
SAMPLE
PROPOSED FIVE YEWt PROGRAM
FISCAL YEAR
78 -79 1.
Cucamonga Channel Bridge
9 440,000
79 -80 1.
Cucamonga Channgel Bridge-,
$ 260.000
2.
Baseline Overlay (FAU)
100,000
3.
Signal - Archibald 6 Church (FAU)
60,000
4.
Signal- Baseline 6 Mailman (FAU)
60,ODO
5.
Signal -Haven Avenue 6 Amber (FAU)
60,000
6.
North Town Street Improvements (In1D)
250,000
7.
Baseline Widening - Beryl to Lion
30,000
S.
Baseline WSdaninA - 600' seat of
30.000
Hiss Maintenance Overlay
Archibald - north side
850,000
60 -81
.
Dear Creek Bridges
300,000
81 -82
1.
Deer Creek Bridge
$ 100,000
2.
Carnelian Street Overlay
30,000
Banyan to Orange
3.
Archibald Avenue Misr Maintenance
100,000
4.
Hiss Maintenance Overlay
88.000
frog Priority List
318,000
82 -83
1.
Major Maintenance Projects
$ 200,000
from Priority List
2.
Major Projecc Des1Rn
60.000
260,000
83 -84
1.
Major Maintenance Projects
$ 185,000
from Priority List
2,
FAU Program Development fcr
70.000
New Highway Act
255.000
TCTAL
$ 2,423,000
CCUMaT CARRYOVER COAT.
150.000
WEAL
$ 2,573,000
• 9
MAJOR MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
C
STREET
LIMITS
ESTIMATED COST
• 1.
Baseline Avenue
Vineyard to Hellman
$ 100,000
2.
Carnelian Street
Baryon to Orange
30,000
3.
Archibald Avenue
4th Street to 19th - Miss.
400,000
4.
Alta Cuesta
Red Hill to Camino Norte
12,000
5.
Arrow Route
Madrone to Vineyard
20,000
6.
Victoria Street
Etivaedz to Pecan
12,000
7.
Etivanda Avenue
19th Street to 23rd Street
40,000
8.
Etivanda Avenue
I -15 to Baseline
35,000
9.
East Avenue
19th Street to Suamit
25,000
10.
Hozmes& Avenue
Lemon to Baryon
15,000
11.
Hellman Avenue
100' south Alta Loma to Orange
10,000
12.
Baseline
Day Creek to Rochester
15,000
13.
Baseline
Etivanda Avenue to Cit, Limit
20,000
14
Various Local Streets
260.000
TOTAL
$ 994,000
C
1 %,
�c
• 0
RECOMMENDED
MINOR WIDENING PRIORITY
STREET
LIMITS
ESTIMATED CO
1.
Baseline
Beryl to Lion
$ 30,000
2.
Baseline
600' east of Archibald — north side
30,000
3.
Ninth Street
Grove to Vineyard
30,000
4.
Archibald Avenue
Hillside to Banyon
25,000
S.
Arrow Route
Archibald to Haven
60,1.00
6.
Carnelian Street
Nilson to Beachwood
10,000
7.
Hillside Road
Sapphire to Pearl
15,000
B.
Turner Avenue
Stafford.to Effren
15,000
9.
Highland Avenue
Hermosa to Haven
35,000
30.
Beryl Avenue
@ Foothill Freeway right of we:
15,000
11.
Hillside Road
Beryl to Hellman
12,000
12.
Church Street
Center to Haven @ Church Street Basin
40,000
13.
Beryl Avenue
Ie oa to 500' north
35,000
14.
Demosa Avenue
300' south to Mignonette
10,000
15.
Eighth Street
Orange to Harm
20,000
16.
Hillside Road
Amethyst to Archibald
16,000
17.
Turner Avenue
700' south to Baseline
35,000
18.
Hemoaa Avenue
North of Banyan — Realign 6 Widen
50.000
TOTAL
$ 483,000
0 s
RECOMMEtTDED
MAJOR PROJECT PRIORITY
,
STREET
LIMITS
ESTIMATED COST
`
1.
Grove Avenue
Sth Street to Foothill
$ 540,000
Widening signal modifications
2.
Vineyard Avenue
Arrow Route to City Limit
300,000
3.
nellman Avenue
San Bernardino Road to Church Street
75,000
4.
19th Street
Carnelian to Haven
1,500,000
Various widening to 4 lanes —
drainage improvement
SPECIFIC PLAN
30,000
S.
Hellman Avenue
@ Foothill Boulevard
300,000
Widening 6 drainage
_
6.
Baseline
@ Hermosa
350,000
Widening 6 drainage
7.
Baseline
Hermosa to Haven
70,000
Widening
B.
Turner Avenue
@ Foothill Boulevard
300,000
Widening 6 drainage
9.
Hellman Avenue
Baseline to SPRR —
250,000
'
Widening 6 drainage
30.
Ramona Avenue
@ SPRR
150,000
Widening 6 drainage
11.
Hermosa Avenue
@ SPRR
150,OOD
Widening 6 drainage
12.
Hallman Avenue
0 AT 6 SPRR
150,000
Widening S drainage
13.
Turner Avenue
@ AT S SPRR 6 Sth Street
175,000
14.
Hellman Avenue
Baseline to 19th Street
200,000
Widening
15.
Amethyst Street
Baseline to 19th Street
100,000
Widening
16.
Hermoua Avenue
South of Bristol
75,000
Widening 6 drainage
17.
Archibald Avenue
19th Street to Highland
100.000
Realign
TOTAL
$ 4,275,000
�:
• •
RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL PR10R1TT
a 1. Archibald and Church
a 2. Baseline and Hellman
a 3. Archibald and Fourth
a 4. Haven and Amber
a 5. Foothill and Hallman
6. Sapphire an,' 19th
• 7. Modify Grove and Artw
Modify Grove and Ninth
Modify Grove and San Bernardino Road
Central School and Archibald _
a S. Archibald and 19th Street
Vineyard and Arrow
a 9. Baseline and Beryl
4 10. Carnelian and Son Bernardino Road
11. Foothill and Turner
" 12. Grove and 8th
a 13. Foothill and Red Hill Country Club Drive
e - cstiwted
4 Eligible for FAD Funding
" Higher costs due to necessary rordwork
J041*/ 3
I �•l
ESTIMATED *
CURRENT
TOTAL VOLUME
MINOR LEG
ACCS
COST ,
16000
1400
3
S 60,000
12000e
4000e
0
60,000
18900
4600
0
60,000
13400
6800
1
60.000
15200
2000
3
3n,000
13000
4400
0
50,000
12000e
5000e
5
11000e
40000
6
see
9000e
4000e
3
page
three
meets school
pelestrian
warrants
— 35,000
7800a
2400e
0
60,000
9800
3600
2
75,000
12000e
3000
1
50,000
12400
1600
2
60,000
11600
2000
0
300,000
12000
2000
0
80,000
16800
1400
0
60.000
J041*/ 3
I �•l
0.
V
• •
HISCELLANEOUS.YRO]ECTS
STREETS
LIMITS
ESTIMATED COST
1.
Lcm
Opal to beryl
$ 25,000
2.
Helloan Avenue
@ 6th Street
15,000
3.
Madrone Avenue
@ Arrov Route
30,000
Realign
6.
East Avenue
@ S, it Avenue
20,000
Realign
5.
Haven Avenue
300' south of Church Street to 19th
90.000
Cvardrail
TOTAL
$ 180,000
0.
V
f4.
G T�
p •a "�
m
S 01 \
OI
O
N N
N N
bO
Y YY O O
O Of OF S O
O .i O rl rl rl
N N N N y K
d
d p p
d
o O o 0
y 0 0 0 0
O O O O
O m m N
.-1
14
N NN N
1 1 1 1
eiNms
M
V u
N
3 �{
•
M
w •5
�a
d
-2 -2 -2
4N
o �o
�0 0
\mN01
y ,L9 C
ONOrI
N N NN
1 1
a
.9�Ft
C
.`3
n
\
O
O
0
0
m
K
v �
4
W
M
�o
o
0
I
'
W N
•'3
/
OVO
vl
m
o O o 0
y 0 0 0 0
O O O O
O m m N
.-1
14
N NN N
1 1 1 1
eiNms
M
V u
N
3 �{
•
M
w •5
�a
d
-2 -2 -2
4N
o �o
�0 0
\mN01
y ,L9 C
ONOrI
N N NN
1 1
a
.9�Ft
C
.`3
n
\
O
O
0
0
m
K
v �
4
w .Sties
b .l y5� W wNN
6v o� �•S x�o°!
�I
i�
E
i
1 '
ORDINANCE NO. ;'S
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI-
FORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE
FEES IU CONNECTION THEREWITH AND DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose.
The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seriously af-
fected by surface and storm waters and the continual subdivis-
ion and development of property within the City has placed a
serious demand on existing facilities which handle surface and
storm waters. In order to plan and develop drainage facilities
for the removal of surface and storm waters and to provide an
equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the de-
velopment of such facilities, the City Council does determine
that a drainage plan must be Adopted and a drainage fee estab-
lished to provide funds to be used for the construction of the
facilities described in the drainage plan.
SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Local Area.
The comprehensive storm drain plane numbers
1 and 2, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for
the area lying within the City limits of the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga, together with construction costs and other related mater-
ial, which comprehensive storm drain plans were prepared by the
San Bernardino County Plood Control District, are hereby found and
declared to be the drainage plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately
of equal magnitude in all areas of the City, and declares that for
the purposes of this ordinance, all areas of the City shall con-
stitute one local drainage area.
SECTION 3: Payment of Fees.
As a condition of approval of a final map a
parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map, or the issuance of a Duild-
ing permit, the City shall require the payment of a fee as is here-
after provided for the purposes of defraying the actual or esti-
mated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the re-
moval of surface and storm waters from the local drainage area.
The City Council finds that development of property within the
local drainage area will require construction of the facilities
described in the drainage plan, and that the fees are fairly ap-
portioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the property in
the local drainage area and on the need for such facilities ere-
-1-
1
aced by the proposed division or development of property in the
local drainage area. The City Council further fi-ds that the fee
as to any property does not exceed the pro rata share of the
amount of the total actual or estimated coat of all facilities
pursuant to the drainage plan which would be assessable on any
parcel of property if such costs were apportioned on a per acre
basis.
SECTION 4: Amount of Fee.
The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance
is $25.00 per 1 /100th of an acre or fraction thereof.
SECTION 5: Deposit and Utilization of Fee.
The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance
shall be deposited in a "planned drainage facilities fund" and
shall be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement
for the construction of drainage facilities pursuant to the drain-
age plan or to reimburse the C ty for the costs of engineering
and adninistratil� ices tDestablish, design and construct
the plan and f ltii up to 25%. Initial funds collected may
be utilized fo cific planning and engineering studies as des-
ignated by resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 6: Exceptions.
Drainage fees shall not be required as a con-
dition of the issuance of a building permit for alteration, re-
pairs, or remodeling of any building where the cost of such alter-
ations, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at less than $10,000.00.
SECTION 7: Single Drainage Fee Payment.
No parcel of land shall be subject to payment
of a drainage fee more than once. If any portion of a parcel has
previously paid a drainage fee, credit shall be given for such
prior payment and a proper apportionment made as a credit toward
any fee payment required by this Ordinance.
SECTION 8: Urgency.
This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency
measure, necessary for the immediate protection and preservation
of the public peace, safety, health and welfare of persons and
property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The facts estab-
lishing the necessity for such urgency measure are these: 9e-
cause of the unique physical location of the City of Rancho Cuca-
monga, surface and storm waters place a serious demand upon
existing facilities during any storm flown the City of Rancho
Cucamonga is seriously affected by any storm waters, and in order
to plan and develop drainage facilities and to collect fees for
the construction of such facilities, the City of Rancho Cuca-
-2 6 )
C�
•
monga must take steps to immediately implement a drainage fee
Ordinance. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
SECTION 9: Severability.
Paragraph, sentence, IclauseaortphraseuinsthisoOrdinance ,�ioroany
Part thereof, is For any reason held to be invalid or unconsti-
tutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the re-
maining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part there-
of. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed
each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that
any one or more sections, sub - sections, sub - divisions, paragraphs,
uenteaces, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or uncon-
stitutional.
SECTION The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City C 1_1 shall attest to the same, and the City Cletk shall
cause the same to be publishbd within fifteen (15) da"a after
its passa a least once in The Daily Raport, a newspaper of
general Tula ion, published in t e City o— Ontario, California,
and circ in tho City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this+ day of _
1979.
ATTEST:
AYES: xif l(rl.CytNikXJ Ilia
NOES•
ABSENT•
C ty Clark
Mayor o t e C ty o
Rancho Cucamonga
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 21, 1979
TO: City Council d City Manager
FROM: JACK LAM, Director of Community Development
SUBJECTS ZONE CHANGE 87 -78 -- Jerry Rodgers -- Changing the tom from
FP -2 (Flood Plain) to A -P (Administrative - Processional) for
property located on the south side of Baseline, 775' west of
Vineyard Avenue.
This item was first heard at the Planning Comnission meeting of April 26,
1978 where the applicant requested a change of zone from FP -2 to R -3. At
that time, the Commission expressed concern over the flooding and sroaloa-
hazards eseuClated with the site'and required an Envirenmantal Impact Report -
(see Minutes of April 26, 1978 meeting).
The application was later heard at the Planning Commission meeting of August 99
1978 and continued to January 10, 1979 because of the existing residential
moratorium. Since the August 9 meeting, the applicant has amended his request
to change the zone from FP -2 to AP (see letter, dated December 20, 1978), to
develop a professional office building Staff accepted this request In that
the proposed land use Is in conformance with the prepared General Plan
designation of mixed use and, on January 30, 1979, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of zone change 87 -73.
The surrounding land use and zoning for this nite is an follows:
Zoning Land Use
North R -1 Alta Loma High School
Vest R -1 Vacant
South FP -2 Vacant
East FP -2 Park
Staff has reviewed this application for adverse environmental impacts resulting
from future development on this site. A significant potential impact to
development Is possible erosion of the building pad during flooding periods.
As mentioned, the Planning Commission earlier had required and EIR for a zone
change fron FP -2 to R -3 because of the erocion potential. Staff feels that
the possible erosion hazard is an effect of development not of zoning, there-
fore, and EIR would not be appropriate at the zone change level.l It should
be made clear to the applicant, however, that detailed studies indicating
proposed mitigation measures will be required prior to development of the
property. The Planning Commission has issued a Negative Declaration for this
zone change on January 10, 1978.
IThe San Bernardino County Flood Control District has tevfewed the request and
has submitted a letter stating that they have no objections to the Zone Change
(Exhibit "B "). 1 C
l/J� )
r. Surface Sti eets: t a Real -Q
• As we read history. thinking big Is the way the . state Is a freeway or
West was won. As we read some recent analyses of N either by cir or by bu
transportaion policy, thinking big is the way the 11 streets or local batten
Weri trouId be lost. or at least that part of it that • to keep those in good
:dependsonlowl sutfaceroadsfarsurvly.
A task force of the Its Angeles Coont Tra
:'tation Commission has recommended, for
that the commission lake over all highway acU
'- in the county, keeping on a few state engin
advisers. At the same time, the chairman of
commission, Supervisor Kenneth Ilahn, is de
1ng changes In the formulas for alloaUng state
federal gasoline taxes so that I.os Angeles can
about $120 million a year that now Is open
hl hways in other southern aunties.
It is hard to argue with either concept.
money and more local control are needed as
Angeles moves Into a new era that will
better cocrdma0on of all tm'tsportation p
promotion of car-poolingB, expansion of pu
transpnnation. more off¢Ient use of exl
freeways. Sloth should be unaed, although Hi
demand has! on deaf eam before, and It Is
•likely that the Legislature Is ready to start
up Its highway system and giving the pl
counties.
I But the proposals leave out one very Impo
element of transportation to Los Angeles. The
money of which Hahn speaks would go to free
and transit when, In fact, the trms�wrWtlon
1 Iwwhose budgets are in the wont abape are
•'� •'! biaa surface streets
Only about�gq mile ijn' ten of paved V
i ��Y •.: .' �l.1 \, aLiwil:Id't 4 i 9 b ,� fit{
S:l�i* ;•`; r£;��t:''�"lt :her "` •s r•,6-� h:•.
t
• a !(1
fair . • i t A.
,r t
theyare beyoydptmppalr
— f
l
r. Surface Sti eets: t a Real -Q
• As we read history. thinking big Is the way the . state Is a freeway or
West was won. As we read some recent analyses of N either by cir or by bu
transportaion policy, thinking big is the way the 11 streets or local batten
Weri trouId be lost. or at least that part of it that • to keep those in good
:dependsonlowl sutfaceroadsfarsurvly.
A task force of the Its Angeles Coont Tra
:'tation Commission has recommended, for
that the commission lake over all highway acU
'- in the county, keeping on a few state engin
advisers. At the same time, the chairman of
commission, Supervisor Kenneth Ilahn, is de
1ng changes In the formulas for alloaUng state
federal gasoline taxes so that I.os Angeles can
about $120 million a year that now Is open
hl hways in other southern aunties.
It is hard to argue with either concept.
money and more local control are needed as
Angeles moves Into a new era that will
better cocrdma0on of all tm'tsportation p
promotion of car-poolingB, expansion of pu
transpnnation. more off¢Ient use of exl
freeways. Sloth should be unaed, although Hi
demand has! on deaf eam before, and It Is
•likely that the Legislature Is ready to start
up Its highway system and giving the pl
counties.
I But the proposals leave out one very Impo
element of transportation to Los Angeles. The
money of which Hahn speaks would go to free
and transit when, In fact, the trms�wrWtlon
1 Iwwhose budgets are in the wont abape are
•'� •'! biaa surface streets
Only about�gq mile ijn' ten of paved V
i ��Y •.: .' �l.1 \, aLiwil:Id't 4 i 9 b ,� fit{
S:l�i* ;•`; r£;��t:''�"lt :her "` •s r•,6-� h:•.
t
• a !(1
fair . • i t A.
,r t
theyare beyoydptmppalr
not they an
carving ante of a
cca to many yea
the dues
rlant cannot e
extra Present i
ways r, however.
systems ,tcwardm
Ctlltor -• • -- Which,
a state hil
.
of the mom
s keep surfs
est canes f
L the value
to
a r,
rye.(
e C��4� Coeeha" d Oh a
. f'•R 4 t Y. ,•,.' 1. A..t.�i \yyxl'. M�...4d1,i1,r: .•J.'.'a' sal.�`t�.i'�� 3•,
yy��.. ����.•• •�C✓ 1 ::!S.i ��•'. ta'G { ..�4�y ^��/K• � r,��r ,�y; ry "�♦���s{.��.�,�/��•Y ��I...T�.�(
- Yµ, Z�afl •.-
ri��•!�f�/
•,ny'a.� ^. .�' �. r�:, Y• h. i✓% 2" wR••'
+ /l.M��i�V�.�M1ir�.%'3ir:V •1`.- .y�'�t��.,V+Ni]
M1
•:
Surface Streets: to
1 t• .t g
r
Real ;Crac up �:
As we read history. thbktrig big is the way the \ elate is a freeway or s stale hlahway. Most trips.
As we read toms recent anaiyaa of 'r either by ear or 1 IAIe. are made on neighborhood
West was won.
dUe b it the way the '
nbe�Ind. a it that l
sUcetsor local boulevards, and the me aysgablet
to keep those In good shape, or rotoea NWeemm.whm ,�'i.,.t
„r••
W a that part of
depend, on lowly surface roads for survival ., they are beyond repair, 8ehrinking Iasi '
' Atask force of the Iss Angeles Coemly Trsnspor. " Pall of the_pre lem fs a IPes of re1'enue_lmLi
waein trouUobrlorethat.
,
'tation Commission has recommended, far example.
.proPert -y—Un -but the
' +
'bpi the rommissim
ty. keeping on few state engineers aas
the
need frromoB�lme�ta c to i"P_ta(sa d eeujn
opaa"11ng condltlim. The rest comesf&'FLifeneral
r;
advisers. At the same time. the chairman of
eommiesim Supervisor Kenneth Hahn, b demand.
revenue. Inflation hixf_CO�th1e_Yalut OLgWUne
yycc�g changes in the formulas for allocating state and
federsi gasoline taus so that 1ss Angeles can keep
teas by two-thirds In the past several ycars.aad
liar driren ost of mater!-' -andlabor_At the
+. x•.
about $120 mom a year that now is spent on
hizbways In other southern counties.
same th- 13 has.Aun&madc !had t...
Problem worse. in Pasadena. for enmp!%i fun are r
this fiscal for only about half PI. the
it is hard to argue with either concept. More
available year
mon and man l.,al control are needed as In
Angeles moves into a new on that will requtrc
street maintenance _tha�abmd�be_aa•.c.1n.x.aa
An eiea, the budget for stmtoperalbei + the same
It was 10 ago,_ang the same Amount of
t
,. better coordination of an transportation piamhlnf.
promotion o[ ar- paobng. espanslon o! Pubic
nil.
a: Years
moneyobvknnlybuys far lmthan itdid l
We hope tut. while the county and the state are
traeuportatan, rose cnt use of eadstin�
fmwaYa Both should l>e pmsued, although Mahn s
demand has fallen on dcaf ears before, and It is not
examining pare s tranaporuUUn -s» 99. Mainten.
they guru ed titre to small.
•�R. : -•. ^;
-Udy that the Legislature is ready to start arvicg
up its highway system and giving the pieta to
be p only for so
ants of a cracked street an be Put off odY !or so
of stmt
many years before the rtreet Is beyond repair and. If r% ^ •Y
cotmdeL
t But the pmfosals lave out one very important
the cities cannot afford maintetunce, they certainly
cannot afford rebuilding Programs Given the _
element of transportation in Ise. Angeles. The extra_
to frec"Y11
• p searese t set of transporution- spending priorities,• — -
r however, that is ema where the state L 6e
r
moxy of whir's Hahn speaks would V
andtraruit.,hen• In fact, the tnnstar ton V'ms
btalgete are to the worst slope Lro or-
. toward mile after mile of unusable surface ds. ,d
•. Which, of Caaso, rasa the hmvltable qu� •ti
ttww6tse
t It, bia'usurfacesueets. �• Who needs brand -new transit systems and
1 +1, 4inlyaboatone l in tenof payed tlQfaee In the me way networks that can be•e reached Only
•, ' }' "yt'�..^�+° �t\ „•
' r^vr7Jn+le 1 .h f�'. . 6 `.S• �.it.l'f
- .}��y.- ��1 t I• .1.'te -k .,�{tr.�J}1,M\!. ': �� � - • ,Y•I A..IL�
Lir.IF
Y eCixG.:'�Tk S:y.TV ,
�.
.
it
- ,• .' _. Syr.
} ��.
Y} t• iJ i.. h.i '!C � \f• . : J ✓ •,r,
M1? •. •Y Yy . Y . .. :ri•,t.r.�.Y :�i!xs'1t. •��C..�l�t'�r"
•.N�.t�:Tr?itiii t�,:'- tt. iYi ';Y!•C•.rKin::.T7��y.`':�•. ;s •" �, i�ir;.. fi :f• ^•.7:t"i,i:,�.. ^_f�;:�+3''•_
a
w;..i9`"•�ia :,'.•f, .^'.A�:'�..'.�:� �•. ^i?, y;f. e:s
.l
Surface Streets: ' a Real Crackup
As we read history, tanking big is the way the state Is a freeway or a state hi hway. Most trips.
Nest was won. As we read some recent analyses of ; eWicr by ear or by
bus, ore made on neighborhood
ransportalion policy, thinking big Is the way the streets or local boulevards• and the money ¢veUable, -
Nest ctiWd be lest, or at least that part of It that '• to keep those In good shape. or restore ihem,wbm'
iepe" on lowly_ surface roads for survival
the- beyond re�air,bal,r6iking fast '
_' __' _ ___ o.., .r .A. -- t... t.. 1 ..r rownvn tram t—�..�
t� 'In the aunty, keepNg on a few stale engineers as need form gasoline taxes to keep surface sreeu In
i, advisers. At the same time, the chairman of the operating ondltion The rest eomn from general
i com almlon, Supervisor Kenneth If" is demuul- revenues IMatbn Iw cut the value o[ gasoline
frigg changes In the formulas for allocating state and .taxes by two -thk4s In the P.t several ytaro: and.
Ii'• f1ral gasoline tarn so that Los Angeles can keep . has driven up the cost of materials and labor at the , -•
P r'' r' ; • about $120 million a Year that now is spent on same lime Pr000elUon 13 has simply made a bad
hlahways in other southern counties. Problem worse pasadena, for example. funds are
1L Is hard to argue with either tooepL Mcre available this fiscal year for oniv about half of the
moneyy and more local control are needed as Ices street maintenance that ahoW be done. In less
Angelm move Into a new ere that will require Angeles, the budget for stmt operation is the same
abetter coordination of all transportation p as it was 10 Years ago, and the same amount of
promotion of car-poolingg expansion of "pub money obviously buys far less than It did then.
tmnsportaticn. more eflWent use of existing We hope that, while tha county and the state are r
fmwaYL Both should be mmud. although Hahn's examining: future transponation• spending priortles,
µ , demand has fallen on deal ears before. and it is of they can spare some lime to %r small. t2en•
likely that the Legislature Is ready to start carving ante of a cracked street can be put off tint for so •e�
S� ,up Its highway system and giving the pieces to many Years before the stmt is beyond repypair and. if, rr ^ ,.
`,.
counties.
uut the Proposals leave out one very Imperiant cannot afford rebuilding afford
b:ilding programs eGiven the
• ' element of transportation In pas Angeles. The tints ppresent set of transportation•spending priorities,
a:
amnd lre,�illwt�enfl s�pt�alts would gaUonf reeways G4ltiw ev mB�et Is mile of unu�sab el em�ufece nro -
• 1.' ppvv�ase budgele are In the worsts are Ca11I0r- •: Which, of course, talus the IneWm6lz quesUom
,e ^c•�3 ,�. hta's surface attiYLL ,,.Who needs brand-new Irandt eyatems and evperb
;,�, f ;f h+ yyaboutonemLLo 'nknotpavedsur[acalnNe�� treewayoetwahaNatcanbenachedoWYOnlaolt,
i.�'I�iJ,,tti'H�'t �, .. 1 a r +v.I•Cr1�'� 1LRF ,�i'L i „' vXL
'� ° ' .,.d -. ,2�ta.+tF �c�lyt�;'. ^,Gj�?aE�.1`�� -'"�i � ; /�',.4tl.r!ro•'� ;,.f } }F f���X "`:.•s . �'-
i.
wi r f J r r 'tal.iiltt•��,• > fA
a ••t'.i.A Y..l;'�t
ii'�i2Y Ih..,iVl,.- l %)i+• V.' •<•! •• fr. f..• f f • ��•"
v. :s4• 'dy =.a .l �•' ::' .'r: °•.t�{'��r.Y. r; i�Msit�t[ tyi(•.
i
'} Lti�)•„`f•J:.'t ^es.Tx�.nit,p':1'i':.'•''Mtti ^.
F
J,
i
highways in other southern counties
It is hard to argue with either concept. More
money and more local control arc needed as Las
Angeles moves into a new era that will require
..better coordination or all transportation plannin�,
promoUon of car-poolingg. expansion of publ c
transportation, more efllclent use of exbung
rreeways Both should be pursued, although Hahn s
demand has fallen on deaf tare before. and it is not
likely that the Legislature Is ready to alert carving
up
Nut highway slstem and giving the pieces to
o � But the proposals lave out one very important
�'f •L
�•i
•' 4 3
worn shape are
problem worn_ In .ass ens, or seamy t,
available thts (Lscai year for on) y about' or the
street maintenance that I d bo dont. In Las ,
Angeles, the budget for elm: tperatbn h the name �f
as it was 10 years ago, and tic same amount of
money obvi%siy buys far less W n!t did Uren.
We hope that. while the count :r ani the state are ,
examining future tratt+poradon- apcndl,)f priorities,
they can spare some Ume to thin: errnm. tfainlen.
ance of a cracked stmt can be pit off or ly for so
many years before the street is beyond rep k and, If, +.
the clues cannot afford maintenance, they terWnly
nn
cannot afford. rebuilding,progra lien the.
'fit •.4 -Miat-
i
J to l: !':� /� •'r�`�w. •.rY /,:.fC �.i. :J,f.Stl
.. t..' Na,f .. :a�Pr,.rfe � ;:.fir ;•r: ^i t��'�if 7 "�`F:d.:'�eA'_.{'$�e
;ti•� atYy,Eil1..::'..t. it t ✓'1.LihJ.r,a:/r} .�:r•i.. i'. .. :`.:. ",. 'a •1J; •, e.� �L.ira,t : "�:�q�x,.
�.r�(p:
�',fe :� �Crid��.�• .rf��: -e - f1*:,
�: ,G 1, !• n'•• ter( ro•C,�j {µ,y .;,r / °•1iw
,�?
Surface Streets:
a Real Cra*ip
`•
As we read history, thinking big b the way the
state Is a freeway or a state highway. Most Ulps,
��t�•a
West was won. As we read some recent analyses of
tratuporla!lonpolicy , thinkingbigbthewaythe
either by car or by bus. arc made on neighborhood
streets or local Wulevards , and the money ava0able.l,:;
''cf t'�ti
,Sect could be lost, or at leya that par t of It eat'
to keep thore In good shape. o: restore them ,when
depends on lowly surfaceroadaforsurvivaL
U: eyarebryondrepair ,isshrinktagfast.
fart a lem is a loss if revenue from
t t
A task force of the Loo Angeles County 7Yanspor.
'tation CommMon has recommended, for example,
the B , •-.n.-
ppr y taxes, but they were In troable before that.
;�.
,that the commission take over all highway activities
in the county, keeping en a few state engineers as
Q es gut only about halt of the mtney that they
need from gasoline taxes to keep sun'ace streets In
i�
advisers At the same Ume, the chalmui of the
commission, Supervisor Kenneth Llahn. in demand-
operating andll". The rest comes from general
revenue. Inflation has cut the value of gasoline
Ing changes in the formulas for allocating state and
lace by hro- thirds In the past assent yeare,and
driven the cost of mad ra4s and la btx at the
'
federal gasoline taxes so that Los Angeles can keep
has u�
h;a eimplyl���ndsue
about 5120 million a year that now Is spent on
same Ume 13nr;tad�UOnd13 �•f' "7`
F
J,
i
highways in other southern counties
It is hard to argue with either concept. More
money and more local control arc needed as Las
Angeles moves into a new era that will require
..better coordination or all transportation plannin�,
promoUon of car-poolingg. expansion of publ c
transportation, more efllclent use of exbung
rreeways Both should be pursued, although Hahn s
demand has fallen on deaf tare before. and it is not
likely that the Legislature Is ready to alert carving
up
Nut highway slstem and giving the pieces to
o � But the proposals lave out one very important
�'f •L
�•i
•' 4 3
worn shape are
problem worn_ In .ass ens, or seamy t,
available thts (Lscai year for on) y about' or the
street maintenance that I d bo dont. In Las ,
Angeles, the budget for elm: tperatbn h the name �f
as it was 10 years ago, and tic same amount of
money obvi%siy buys far less W n!t did Uren.
We hope that. while the count :r ani the state are ,
examining future tratt+poradon- apcndl,)f priorities,
they can spare some Ume to thin: errnm. tfainlen.
ance of a cracked stmt can be pit off or ly for so
many years before the street is beyond rep k and, If, +.
the clues cannot afford maintenance, they terWnly
nn
cannot afford. rebuilding,progra lien the.
'fit •.4 -Miat-
i
J to l: !':� /� •'r�`�w. •.rY /,:.fC �.i. :J,f.Stl
.. t..' Na,f .. :a�Pr,.rfe � ;:.fir ;•r: ^i t��'�if 7 "�`F:d.:'�eA'_.{'$�e
;ti•� atYy,Eil1..::'..t. it t ✓'1.LihJ.r,a:/r} .�:r•i.. i'. .. :`.:. ",. 'a •1J; •, e.� �L.ira,t : "�:�q�x,.
A •
Page 2
A notice of public hearing was published in the Cucamonga Times on February 9,
1979 In adaition, a notice of this hearing was mailed to property owners with-
in 300' of the subject property. No correspondence has been received in regards
to this notice
RECOfMEN:ATION: The Planning Commission rec=ends adoption of the Ordinance
approving Zone Change 87 -73, changing the zone from PP -2 to A -P.
` - �ctfu�onitted,
JACK LAM, Dire o
Community Development
JL:BNN:cc
Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report, January 10, 1979
Exhibit "A" - Zoning Map
Minutes of Planning Commission fleeting, April 26, 1978
Minutes of Planning Commission fleeting, January 10, 1979
Letter from Jerry Rodgers, dated December 20, 1978
Exhibit "8" - Letter from S.B.C.P.C.D
Initial Study
Resolution 79 -02
r R K*10 CI'CVJrA
STAFF tuoRT
HATE-' January 10. 1978
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
Fnot4: JACK LAN. Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: ZONE CHANCE 87 -73 -- Jerry Rodgers -- Changing the zone from
FP -2 (Flood Pia in) to A -P (Administrative - Professional) for
property located on the Booth side of Baseline, 775' vest of
Vineyard Avenue.
BACY,CROUND: This item was heard at the Plcrning Comminsinn meeting of April
26, 1978 where the applicant requested a change of zano from FP -2 to R -3.
At that time, th,r COmmleslon expressed concern over the flooding and erosion
hazards associated with the alto and required an Enviromental Impact herort
(see Minutes of April 26, 1978 meeting).
The application wa- later heard at the Planning Co ®isafon meeting of August 9,
1978 and continued to January 10, 1979 because of the existing residential
moratorium. Since the August 9 meeting, the applicant has amended his requeat
to change the zone from PP -2 to AP (sea Ietter, dated December 20, 1978), to
Jevelop a professional office building. Staff accepted this request in that the
proposed land use Is in conformance with the proposed General Plan.
The General Pldn designation for this site is Nixed Use and the surrounding
land use and zoning is as follows:
Zu. nine Land Use
North R -I
West Alta Loma High School South R -1 Vacant
East FF -2 Vacant
FP -2 Park
ANALYSIS:
Environmental Review - Staff has reviewed this application for adverse environ-
mental impacts resulting from f"ture development on this cite A significant
Potential impact to development is possible erosion of the building pad during
flooding periods. As mentioned, the Planning C•rmniasion had required an EIR
for a zone change to R -3 because of the erosion potential Staff feels that thn
Possible erosion hazard is an effect of development not of zoning, therefore.
an EIR would not be appropriate at the zone change level. It should be made
"lair to the applicant, however, that detailed studies Indicating proposed
mitigation measures will be required prior to development of the property.
We reserve the right to require additional environmental data at the site
development stage. Staff to therefore recommending issuance of .1 Negntive De-
claration for this zone change
The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has reviewed the request
and has submitted a letter stating that they have nr. objections to the Zone
Change (Exhibit "D'•).
ITFN "p'•
Page 2
1 Site Analysis - ac req
Plan and the site 18 suitable !e sizeeand shape atonaccoommodateptheousesOPermitted with the
In the A -P zone.
CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published In the Cucamonga
Times pn December 28, 1978. In addition, a notice of Ch1e n the C was mailed to
Property owners, within 300' of the subject property. No s bearing has
been recieved in regards to Chia notice
RECOi01ENDATION•
reeoom� end in e• Th. Planning Division recommends adoption of Resolution No 79 -02
8 approval of Zone Change 87 -73 changing the zone from FP -2 to A -P and
forward it to the City Council
Respectfully submitted,
JACK LAN, Director of
Community Development
JL: &O1: elm
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Zoning Nap
Minutes of Planning Commission meeting. April 26, 1978
Letter from Jerry Rodgers, dated December 20, 1978
Exhibit "B" - Letter from S.B.C.F C.O.
Initial Study
Resolution 79 -02
/09
i
U,
a
C -I -T
I, ST AIC4 IItIUS P, (AlT,1 LOMA N,-,
f3! •FEIN! —"--- r
ST
E
J
i
2
U
C - I
(VACAMI )
EY-V%% t 1
A•
• ZoNIN �, fvTnl'
2C 'S -1 -73
s
■
FP -Z
To
V- P -2
NAU%N T �
N
w
d
YI
W
L
7
7�n
Planning Commission Minutes (cont'd) April 26, 1978 ,
CONSENT ITLMS:
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
(Environmental Impact Reports)
Mr. Wossermnn reported that an Environmental Review Committee
will be established to review proposals to determine whether
an Environmental Impact Report will be required.
Consent Items I through 8 have been reviewed by the Environmental
Review Committee and its recommendations arc listed Mr Wasser-
man explained that all items listed tinder consent are considered
to be routine and can be enacted by one motion, unless a Commissioner
wishes to pull from the consent any item which can then be discussed
sepatately by the Planning Commission
Mr Dahl stated that he would like to pull items 2, 3 and 4 Mr.
Garcia requested that item 7 be pulled off the consent Items.
ACTION Upon motion by Tolstoy, seconded by Garcia and un..,imously
carr ed, it was voted to approve the following consent Items:
(1) Conversion of an existing residence into a restaurant, s/w
corner of Foothill Blvd 6 Vineyard Avenue, C -2 -T -
A negative declaration has been determined
(s) Zone Change from 7N -RS -T to A -1 - Expansion of an existing
nursery, n/o of 19th St approx 200' sr /o Amethyst -
A negative declaration has been determined .•
(6) Change or zone from R -1 to A-P, s/e corner of Snsclinc
6 Heilman, approx 2 3 acres (Douglas 6 Rgthleen Ilene)
A negative declaration has been determined
(8) Change of zone from R -3 to A -P, .37 acre, n/w corner of
Baseline $ Amethyst (James Van Antwerp) -
A negative declaration has been determined.
f'tr Dahl stated that mt items 2, 3 and 4, he would hope that tilt
applicants are aware that a new ordinance is being prepared
regarding minimum lot sizes.
Mr Garcia stated In regards to item 7, that he would hope to see
the Environmental Impact Report address drainage and topographical
concerns as tell as provide mitigating measures on same, lie also
stated his desire to review the basic guidelines for Environmental
Impact Reports.
ACTION Upon motion by Uahl, seconded by Garcia and unanimously
carried, it was voted to approve the foliowing consent items:
7/..
(2) Tentative Tract 10363, 9y acres, R -1 development, n/s of
Hillside Road, approx 1000' w/o Sapphire Street -
A negative declaration has been determined
(3) Tentative Tract 10157 6 zone change from A -1 -5 to
R -1- 20,000, 30.8 acres, s/o Nilson, c/o Chaffey College,
n/o Banyan - Because of potential flood problems, an Environ-
mental Impact Report would be necessary.
(7) Zone change from FP -2 to R -3, s/s of Baseline, approx. 775'
1+/0 the intersection of Bnseline G Vineyard - Because of
potential flood hazards, an Environmental Impact Report
will be required for this project.
- 4 -
0
•
Mr. NOPSOn, City Attorney, Stated If the use pre -dates
non-con fo.,jing the ordinance, it would be a
know use which we couldn't eliminate through zanlng A[ this CSme he
a n
dace not know how far back the County home occupation ordinance gaee.
olasioner Jones asked if a person presently hsa a business In his home which Is
a non - conforming use and that person should move to another location w
be allowed to continue in the new location. ould that use
Mr. Lam stated if a person should move to ar�ther location within the city he would
have to comply with the game regulations as everyone else. The City can't give Special
preference over others
Michael Valrin stated he would like to recommend one change in the report. Condition
No. 7 should state no home occupation shall be conducted in an nnsessory building.
Norval use of the garage may be Permitted if such use doe, not obstruct required
parking.
Jack Lnm stated Condition. 05 of the report should also be changed as follows. The
conduct of a home occupation shall not involve visiting the premises by clients or
customers.
Michael Vairin reported Condition 09 should he reworded as follows: The use shall
not Involve storage of materials or supplies in accessory buildings or outdoor storage,
Chairman Rmpel opened the public hearing
City Attorney stated as far as Plano lessons and the like In the home, he is concerned
at this time with the wording S loving this type of use. Perhaps the Commission would
consider continuing this item to the next meeting in order for him to review this
Section.
There being no comments from the audience, the public hearing was closed.
A Motion was made by Commissioner Tolatoy and seconded by Commlssioner Dahl to con-
tinue review of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -02 to the next regular meeting of
January 24, 1979
AYES: TOLSTOY, DAHL, GARCIA. JONES, REHpEL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
A t w
ZONE CIIA14E 110. 87 -73 - ROGERS - Request to chnnge the roning from FP -2 (Flood Plain 2)
to A -P (Admintstrot I've and Professional) zone on the property located on the south side
of Baseline Avenue 8001+ cast of Carnelian Street.
Barry Nogan, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff re part in detail, this being on
file in the Planning Division. The Planning Dtvistm recommends adoption of
Resolution No. 79 -02 recommending approval of Zone Change No. 87 -73 changing the
zone from FP -2 to A -P and forward it to the City Council.
Commissioner Garcia asked if Staff has any idea of what will be developed on this
property.
{ Planning Commission Minutes -13-
,_ January 30, 1979 73
Barry Hogan stated ti:e applicant is proposing an office structure '
Chalraan Rempel opened the public hearing.
Mr. Rogers hanged he would answer any questions the Commission may have regarding
zone
this zone change.
Mr. Hogan stated he might indicate the reason the staff report indicated the issue
of flooding on the property Is so that the applicant to aware that the City will be
looking at this problem at the site approval stage However, any discussion regarding
this matter should be discussed at the Bite approval stage.
lie Mills, Engineer, stated they are presently reviewing the drainage problem with
the City Engineer and trying to resolve them prior to review of site plane.
There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Rempel closed the public
hearing.
A Motion was made by Comm. tssioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Jones to approve
Resolution No 79 -02 approving Zone Chdnge No 87 -73.
AYES: DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, RDIPEL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
MOTION CARRIED
��. f fee♦
DIRECTOR REVIEN N0. 78 -12 - ALDERFER - Request for develnpment of a two story, 10,000
BquarTe foot ofrico building located at 8030 Vineyard Avenue In the C -2 zone.
Jack I= stated the applicant has requested that this Item be continued to the next
meeting of January 24, 1979.
A !lotion was made by Commissioner Tolatoy and seconded by Comm issioner Dahl to con-
tinue Director Review No. 78 -12 until January 24, 1979 at the request of the appli-
cant.
AYES: TOISTOY, DAHL, GARCIA, JONES, RDIPEL
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
f e f o f
PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS (Continued from December 12, 1978).
Jack 1,am reviewed the staff report, this being on file in the Plaming Division
Staff recommends that the Comm, lesion establish the excused and unexcused absences
allowed prior to removal and ndapt Resolution Nv. 7943 establishing the Planning
Commission Administrative Regulations.
Planning Commission Minutes -14- January 10, 1979
i
ROARS CONSTRUCTION CO.
GENERAL ENGINEERING
154 CAST 16TH STREET
UPLAND. CALIFORNIA 91706
(714) 061.7553
D7cnnb -r 20, 1978
pity of Rancho Cnr.lr;n
P.O. Box 7'.15
R,ncno Cucraotr', C +lif• 9!7?0
Subjectt Zones cIvIn -,c 07 -737 from FP -2 to R -)
D-ar Sir,
The city is considertuq ny request for zone a1m o on ny property located
at 8801 Baseline.
This request H87 -73 is coning up for consideration at the first Planninp,
Commission •neeting in January, 1979. I am requesting this application bo
amended to A -P zone.
Respectfully
J6rx�r e Sera d
JJR/lmr
CITY Or RANCHO MCAMOHGA
COMMU141TY UVROPMEN1 OUT.
DEC 20 1978
A4 PEt
7t81`j110ti!11211t2t3t9t5tG
i
15
SAN OCR*INO COUNTY aLf'OO COR ROL UST
INTER- OFFICE MEMO
DATE April 22, 1977
FROR Dili C. Y.sao (2368)
• Aaslstsnt flood control tegiteer
TO Plenalax Departaeat
Attention: Junta Jaquocs
File: 4-7.04/1.00
1BJELT 20t1E 1, 6ED DILL 6[51)1 - PARCEL SCOUT Of 6NSE1,117E HOAR, RSMT -11
f:ARMU1N AVEIM AID VICETARD AVMnM
ExEliarr ��
,1,4.•1} f
• I.In M -\
Ike owner oC the s0ject parcel had been In comet with the District
regardlag the presaut TP -2 Toning of the property. The toning of this
property recording ti inforantiw avalloblo in this offices was based
,epos county Planning 17apartment'e redoaendettone in 1969.
ilia property is surrovndad by a fired control and water concomatfon area,
and apparently thus thT rP -2 70nitn. The District operates the Rod 11111
Davin to the couch, ane A public recreation end rack use exists to Lice
cast. Storm drains dicr]+nrgo into w.tercourace existing nlon. the oast
end west aide of the petrel, and therefore possible erosion exists there-
from.
Us have ndvised the oennr nay request for n aline cimngo would have to be
wade to your office. I1r -ar, this office would lirvn no obJactfoo to the
none client.*, providing the 7xacr is cxcre of poopibla erosion alonr the
tides of the parcel and sukta provisions ad nececcar/ to protect tna
property at ouch ti=e ao it is developed. It to understood a otoraee
facility is piaaned for the area.
We will by copy of We lettar ndv7.so the v:nor of our non- ob)actlon to
the tone decnge, par his request, Tlenea advice if wa ecn provide any
eddittooal tnforaatton on the n*trer. Ca are attachfng a plat showing
the property for your infomatica.
nil, C. MAUI
AealatAnt rlood Control P.nnioner
vntor Reeoureea - Land Development
P H: sv
Attach, s noted
cat rry J. Rogers
P154 East Sixteenth Street
Upland, CA W86
Carl Hastogale
=0 Land Development Division
4
I " • •
r PRELII1111AR1' EINIROi HU11AL VESCRIPTION FORD
(PEUF)
n
Introduction: The questions In tills form are desinned to ohlaln r,v,ugh (lain about
your proposed project and your project site to all± the staff nd /pr CRC to
adcoua tely assess your protect By takino the a time to fully respond to the qucctlnns
below, ynu can help reduce the orocessing time for your project Use additinnal
sheets where necessary
PrCicct Description
Describe your proposed project Ip as much detail as pees l6le hlrnl lfy lhu
project s cprclflc crmgronents and the rcasnns fnr prnp,sing Me p,nirrl at Ihic
time Also, dis ^iss the speci lIt Issues Identified below, where applicable _
This request is [ors zone change from Zone FP2 Flood Plain to R -1 Residential,
applicable zoning to permit construction of 12 living units in an apartment
a Describe any producl(d that will br manufactured o, processed by w project
and the msrket It (they) will serve ye
b Indicate the mirkrt Nail your units a, Iecign,d In •.,rye, and why 11".
number of units and the density proposed arc necessary
Continued need and demsnd for rodecatoly, priced living units
C Dlceuv, any phncing of ytr r Prnlvlce,l prnjrei on the Prnlnnrd Cllr n, In
relation to adjacent projects or Irani,
Ill
s .
2_
d Size of Parcels) (acres) 1.00 Acres (Groom to original Street R/w line)
Assessor's Parcel Humber(s) 207 - 031 -19
Total number of units 32 Living units
—��
Total number of lots ono
Square footage of all str -tures 27,000 S F
Height of proposed structures 24 ft. in front, 34 ft. in rear
Number of parking spaces 64 spaces
Area of paved surface 15,400 S F.
,)let aim turbcd area Entire Site M
Streets) that provide access Baseline Po)ad
Site Description
2 Describe the site as thoroughly as possible The following factors should be
considered:
n a Describe the type of vc•tetatton and the percentage of file site that II
coverq List the animals that you have seen or that are known to occur
on the site
Volunteer rye grass 6 wacds presently kept mowed, cover the entire
Parcel
only gophers 6 an occasional lack- rabbit are seen crossing the property.
b Describe the lopngrarhy (I r , slopes, landrorms, landscape) or G,e sit$.
Any data on sot is and geology would also be helpful
-Parcel has a uniform slope of 21 from Bssolino Road southerly Soil
would be classified as a sandy clay loam situated on an alluvial fan as
_mint of the Cuenmu:xla area is
c Dlsruss any stream channels or eroded oreas on the site
Storm drains dischargu along the cast and went side of the parcel into
,1 existing Flood Control maintained water courses. During the course of the
p '67 flood however, no erosion took place as all flood waters were cunt rolled /////''''',,,�s
within the earth clwt:uol a. SDCFCD ha! axpreseed "no objection- to a zone cl.r.✓
on w snh act property. See ¢xhLblt •E ;x
N
�YY
• PEOF
d. Describe any Implements on the site'
The entire parcel has boon ronced and o few traes planted with volunteer
I
grass, which is irrigated and eaintdined
e In order to save time for processfng your project, you should contact
the County Museum (Or Gerald A Smith, 716/875 4825) and
determine whether ycvr project site requires an archaeological survey
A letter or study from the Museum Association Indicating the archarol-
ogical and historlca. status of your site stall accomPany tills PEOF
f Oescribe the agen lrs that are or will be provid;.iq the 1`011041,9 s,,rvicrs
or utili•ies. ladica te th cir nearest connection Point or location ar their
stations.
Electricity Southern California Edison Company
^ Gas Southern California Gas Company
Water _ Cucamonga County Water District
Sewage Disposal Chino Basin Municipal Water District
Cucamonga County Water District
Refuse Disposal Several private services are o, cretin q in the CSty.
Schools Central School District - Elementar t Chafroy School District -
[it 11 School.
Fire Protection Foothill Fir, District
1
M
��r,�
r[DF
3. Describe lho land nses on the adjacent Ian.; in each direction Ilole any major
or Important natural or man -made features on the adjacent land: for example,
major highways, stream channels, or other notable features Where possible,
provide a vicinity map slowing the project site's relationship to these features
Northerly and adjacent to Daoelino Road, Alta tow Iligh Schools Easterly,
Flood Control property and CSA 50 Park; Southerly, Flood Control Basin,
Westerly, Flood Control Channel and vacant land
4 Describe the site nitrratim,s that will be produced by your prnposrd protect
For Instance, describe topographic changes, the percentage of the site that vi)_i
be graded, storm flows that will have to be chanorlired, and other changes Also,
Indicate any new services or utilities that will be required as a result of your
project.
Site shall be fully graded to accept apartment buildings Parking under living
I units shall be stepped to fit the existing terrain as closely as is practical.
Exia'ing drainage channels on each side of the project shall be improved as
' necessary to Protect the site from erosion. Normal water, sewer, gas, power b
telephone services will be utilized by the project
Identify airy other agateies that you have contacted during the procrsslnn of
your project Plense Include copies of correspoMenre with any stale, federal
or other local agencies or departments where the proposed project is discussed
Attnclmd please rind a copy or an inter- offtea n•ma from tits Floe,, Control
District to tho Planning Dept , relating no objections to the Zone Change
request.
1
M
r
L 1
19
9
0 •
PRLLIIIIIIARY LRVIR001ILIIIAL ll_LSCRII'lIU(I rml,J "
- (FLUE) _
I nlruduclion: The questions in tiffs fomn are declgned fn ohla•n ronurlh nut', about
your proposed project and your project site. to allow the ¢t,irr and /or CRC In
adeouately assess your project By taking the time to fully rec POnd In Ill. •plret Ions
brfow, ynu can help reduce the processing time for your project re Use o I I- -wr
sheets where necessary
L ro acct 0__ cscriptionn
Describe your propocrd project in ac much detail ac Iv,¢¢il,lr Idrnl try Ihr
P'n laC t'e cpccl(Ir Component¢ and file reacnnc rnr prop,clnq Iln• ,n.,irrl di Ihl%
time Also, discuss ibe specific Issues Identified belay where applieahlp
This request la for a zone clongo from 2tono rp2 rlomi pill,, to R -3 Ro,identiall
gppllcatlo zonllg to perm(t construct.o�o[ 32 living units In an apartment
a D'rseribe any product(, II,AI Will he manufactured ul procrcced 1•y yon' ruJret
end the market it (;hey) will serve
b, Indicate Ihr; mlrirt Ilgt y'nlr unit5 •lrr drelgm•d In •.rr vr, —_-
Timber of units and file density "'I 'rI'v Iln•
Y ProposrJ -lie nrcrscary
Continuci need and demand for modaratoly priced living unit,
c Ui:nr.: Any plla%inq nr ynm pinlrncrd pin)rr,l un IN, prrgmmrd %Ile or I,
Oath)" to Adp"nl Prn locic or land
•>t
(3 1.�t
_2.
d Size of Far ^el(s01cres) 1 R•1 kcres (C.ro"n t �igl nil Street R/H line)
Assessor's Parcel flumher(s) 207- 031 -10 '
Total number of units 32 Llvin•) wd.ts
Total number of lots One'1'
Square footage of all structures 27,000 5 F. ,
Height of proposed structures 24 ft In front, 14 it In rear
Number of par4ing spaces 04 spaces
Area of paved surface 15,400 S.F
M
To tti disturbed area Entire Site
Strect(s) that provide access Baseline Road
Site Description
2 Describe the sit, as thoroughly as possible. The following fpctois should be
considered:
/1 a Dv%c tla ribc ivp" or "',elation and the prrronla,tr nr 11,r all, that II
t the animals that you have seen or that nrr known to occur
no the site
Volunteer rye grans 6 weeds presautl
y kept mowed, cover the enttrn parcel
Only gophors s an occasional jack- rabbit are seen croanl ny the pmparty
b. Drael the the lnpngrapl,y (I r , elapse, ImulformK. landscape) of tile a11.
Any data on soils and gcolony squld also be helpful
Parcel has a uniform slope of 21 from Baseline Road southerly Soil
would ba classl Clcd as a sandy clay loam situated on an alluvial fan as
4w"t of Lhu Curamrnxa arra is --
c Discuss any stream channels or eroded areas nn the all,
Storm drains dincllargu along the enst atnl went sid, of the Parcel into
' r S oxl a log Flood Con:rot maintain
ed water courson During the course ui Lite
1 '69 flout however, to erosion took place an all flood waters were cool rolled
X31 wl thin tho earth 1.14111,1016 SIXIFCD has expressed "iq ab)ec Clop" to a rant c
{,� on t o sub set property. Sao Exhibit "D".
1'CDF
d Describe may Iml*cmcnls on the Ile -d
The ,entire parrot has been fenced and a [ew trees planted with volunteer
grass, which !s Irrigated and winlained.
e In order to save time fnr processing Your project, Yon should contact
the county Museum (Dr Gerald A Smith, 71h/&75-Li1751 and
determine whether your project Site rS gulres an arahattsloniul survey r
A letter or study from the Iluseum Association Indlcating the areharol-
aglcat and historical status of your site stall accompany this PECF,
1. Describe the agencies that are nr will be Providing the folirsrinn srrvices
nr ulllities Indicate their nearest comicction Point or location of their
r
stations
Electricity South— rnCa11fo,nla Edison Company
i -
Gas southern a11f1rnLa C30 Co —�
Company
r
Va to Cucamonga County Mater District
•
Sewage Disposal Chow Basin Municipal Mater Dl strict
Cucnnonga County tlater District
Refuse Disposal Several Prlyats urviros aro otmrsting in tha City.
Schools Central Sclnwl District - Elcmcntur r Clv,rfo Sduwl Dletrlct -
16, h Selwot.
fire Pt nlctliu, twthlll I'll' District •- — -. —_~- -
IR3
• PEOF
i Doscribc
Important Inc tarn uses on Lhr adJACrnl land in each dln•etlnn ,lair, any mayor
♦
or Important na Uuai or non -made feat nr r% on Ihr adjn•r•nl land; for example,
major higlmnY %, %lrram cl•iuncls• or other notable fcatnrrs• d: rc pexample.
provide a vicinity map Showing the project site's relationship to these (,,lures.
Northerly and adjacent to Baseline Road, Alta tnma 1119h School, Easterly,
Flood Control Property and CSA 50 Park; SoutlwSly, Flood Control Oasln
Westerly, Flood Control Channel artd vacant land.
�• Describe Ibe site allrratlons That will he produced by lone prolnsrJ project.
for 11M.1 er, describe Inpvtgrophic eliange %, Ihr per een [aqr of Ihr stir lira, viii
be n•adcd, storm flewrs Ihut w111 Invr to he ehaune 11 red, and other dranor% Ai%o,
indicate any new services or ugllties that will be required as a result of your
project
Site 911411 bo Cully graded to accept apartsent build Lngs. parking under living
unit% shall be '"IWd to fit the existing terrain as closely as Is practical.
Existing drainage chaunola on each side of tits
project shall bo lmprov¢d as
necessary to protect the alto from erosion llormil water, sewo' r, 9:
gas, Lrowcr s
Telephone services viii bo utilized by the ptu i eat.
S YOU,
identify project olPIC agenrlct Ihnt luu have eunlaclrd rh,rinn Ihr ptnn•ss iuq of
your project Please Include topics of eorrespondr•ncr it tit an
or other Incal agencies or departments where the proposed project 's . (rderod
Y aWle, federal
Attached ple.ec fLrvl n colry
Of an inter Cieu eu•mt (amt the: Ylnrxl Contrul
It t:.h lcl to Lite Ill 1•,,,r.,,, - - _--_
rn
N
Y
rJ�
J • •
RESOLUTION NO 79 -02
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAHONGA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMENDING APPROVAL OF
ZONE CHANGE NO. 87 -73 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN
THE ZONING FROH FP -2 TO A -P FOR APPROXIMATELY
1 ACRE LOCATED ON 711E SOUTH SIDE OF BASELINE,
775' HEST OF VINEYARD,ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.
207- 031 -19.
WHEREAS, on the 4th day of April, 1978, an application was filed
and accepted on the above described project; and
WHEREAS, on the 10th day of January, 1979, the Planning Commission
held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California
Government Code.
SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the
following findings:
1. That the subject property Is suitable for the
uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms
If access, size, and compatibility with existing
land use in the surrounding area;
2. The proposed tons change would not have significant
impact on the environment nor the surrounding pro -
petties; and
3. That there is reasonahle probability that the
land use proposed will be consistent with the
GCnetal Plan proposal being considered.
4 There is little or no probability of substantial
iotriment to or interference with the future adopted
General Plan if the use proposed to ultimately
inconsistent `iith the General Plan.
SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that the
project will not crente a significant adverse impact on the environment
and has issued a Negative Leclaration on January 10, 1979.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1r RESOLVED:
1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the
California Government Code, that the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
recommends approval on the 10th day of January, 1979,
Zone Change No. 87 -73.
1.
�5
r� • •
2 The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the
City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 87 -73.
3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re-
lated material hereby adopted by the Planning
Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10th DAY OF JANUARY, 1979.
PW7NINC CONNISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
7
IetIDan Rempal, Chat :
ATT� -
Secretery of the son ni g Commission
I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,
mm
passed, and adopted by the Planning Coission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of January,
1979.
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, HEMPEL
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CONHISSIONERS: NONE
• /
M E M O R A N D L' M
TO: Laurence
FROM: Harry
c,\
SUBJECT: Dog License
On December 12, 1978, representatives of the Finance Departments
of the cities of Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, and Montclair net in
the office of Mr. A.C. Gabriel, Finance Director of Ontario with
Mr. Cass Schreib, General Manager of the Pumane Society of the
Chaffey Community. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss
the Humane Society's request for ingreases in dog license fees.
Questions asked of Mr. S,hrieb wore concerned with the Society's -
increased expenditures, particularly in the area of the addition
of five full -time employees to handle the additional work load
acquired by contracting with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
provide animal regulation services. After comparing the total
employees before and after the addition of Rancho Cucamonga to
the total area covered and the population served, it was agreed
that the increase in personnel is in direct relationship to pop-
ulation.
The Finance committee also determined that the Humane Society is
conducting extensive house -to -house canvassing for the purpose
of licensing unlicensed dogs. It was suggested that the cost
of attaining the same result could be decreased considerably if
notices were delivered by mail as the first attempt to contact
the owners of dogs for which licenses have not been renewed.
The next step would be to ring doorbells, but, hopefully, many
of those contacted by mail would have obtained licenses after
receiving a reminder. It was suggested that utilizing a computer
system for identifying delinquent licensees would save a great
deal of time and probably reduce cost.
It does appear that the requested increase in license fees is
warranted. The last increase was effective July 1, 1975, and
information furnished by Mr. Shreib indicates that dog license
fees in the four cities contracting with the Humane Society are
lower than most other areas The new schedule provides for a
reduced fee for Senior Citizens, which certainly has the approval
of this committee.
At the meeting of December 12, it was noted that animal = egulation
S7
Page 2
Memo: Dog License
ordinance in the four cities are not consistent. We are suggesting
that with the granting of increases in fees, the titles standardize
ordinances regarding animal regulation, It is further suggested
that the nuoane society implement a system fcr mailing notices
regarding delinquent licenses. It is hoped that a savings would
result enabling the society to improve response to calls regarding
leash law violations.
Therefore, it is recd ended that a 25t increase in fees be granted
and a special reduced fee for senior Citizens be instituted.
Also it is recommended that we delete section (4) of Ordinance 14
and rewrite it as follows:
Section 4.
a. Dog license fees are hereby set by resolution. _
EJE:cak
Attachments
1
a �
# •
Resolution no. 79 -11
,
A Resolution1 of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, adopting a Fee Schedule for the Licensing of Dogs in
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Whereas, the law of the State of California requires
that dogs kept within the state be licensed.
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall impose a fee requirement
for the licensing of dogs.
Be it further resolved that the following charges -
are established:
3. For each male dog, ten and no /100ths ($10.00)1
2. For each neutered male dog, with proof of
neutering, five and no /100ths ($5.00);
3 For each spayed (n99yy t�ered) female dog•�ytj"�h
proof of spaying,-W71'�`tand�-60 /lo0ths ); and
4. For each unspayed female dog, five and no /100ths
(SS. -001. Z
r.
Be it further resolved that a penalty in the amount
of five and no /100ths ($5.00) shall be added to each license
fee for failure to pay such fee within thirty (30) days after
such license fee shall fall due.
Be it further resolved that the owner of any dog, which
owner moves into the City from another community, upon the pre-
sentation of a rabies vaccination receipt signed by a licensed
veterinarian and a license receipt from another community for the
current year, may be issued a Rancho Cucamonga license tag upon
the payment of one and no /100ths ($1.00) to cover the cost of the
tag.
Be it further resolved that any dog reaching the age of
four (4) months between July 1 and December 31 of the current year
shall be subject to the regular annual license fee. Any dog reach-
ing the age of four (4) months between January 1 and March 31 shall
be subject to one -half (k) the annual license fee. Any dog reaching
the age of four (4) months between April 1 and June 30 shall be sub-
ject to one - fourth (h) the annual license fee.
-lJ
• s
H E H 0 R A N D U H
DATE: February 15, 1979
TO: City Council
FROM: Fact Finding Committee
SUBJECT: Final Report Concerning the Impact
If Building Moratorium is Lifted
On December 20, 1978 the City Council unanimously agreed to appoint a Fact
Finding Committee to vc"fy the data submitted concerning the city's proposed _
growth management program. During the interim period while the Fact Finding
Committee was completing Its task, the City Council extended the building
moratorium on single family and certain types of multi - family dwellings to
March 9, 1979. The City Council requested that the Fact Finding Committee re-
view the following Issues:
1. Review and verify the Information submitted to the Planning
Co:mmisalon and Council regarding the number of single family
residential units involved in the proposed growth management
plan
2 Verify attendance data submitted by the school districts
7 Evaluate the fiscal and economic Impact the proposed growth
wnag ±ment plan may have upon the city$ school district, and the
community.
4. Determine the actual amount of time double sessions may be
required because of the lack of classrooms
S. Determine the actual number of homes under construction in each
school district within the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
6. Determine the nctual number of hones under construction in other
areas within the boundaries of the Chaffey Joint Union High School
District.
7. Determine whether there is a need for additional housing within
our community
8 Determine the impact the growth management plan may have upon our
schools.
/ 1
City Council
February 15, 1979
Page Two
Since its formation, the Fact Finding Committee has scheduled four meetings
in order to discuss and analyze the data which has been nd submitted by the city
staff, the representatives of the Building Industry,
Met Joint Union High School District, Central
superintendents from the
School District, and the Alta Lom Elvmen[ary School District. As a result
of these meetings, the Fact Finding Committee has reached the following con-
clusions:
\` 1. There are presently 556 unite of proposed single family developments
' In tracts approved by the* County prior to incorporation The pri-
f" wry reason for the delay in processing was because of a lack of
sewer allocation at the time the tracts were approved by the County.
°J M approved tenrative means that the city may not further review nor
I_ pose further conditions upon a tract because it was previously Map
approved by the County in ce•.ordance with the State �nleterialnra[her
Act. Issuance of n building permit is, therefore,
�i
than discretionary It is significant to note, however, that the
impact discretionary
these developments will not be* realized by the schools until
impact year these de 1 Th is is due to the fact that the remaining 556 of
unite would be phased in order to minimirc the Impact. Because us s les
the time lag required because of processing,
ti,e units would not !love an itmedlate im pact upon [hR aehoole
,r 2 The Committee has verified the attendance data submitted by the school
districts. The Cucamonga School District currently has 122 units of
Y currently constructed, unoccupied structures The Central School Dis-
' tract has 249 unite and Alta Loma has approximately 1197 units with
and am ready for Con-
c' an additional 185 I;ts which have been graded
struction to begin.
rA, A detailed breakdown of the tract numbers and unite in each tract is
�? contained in Appendix A of this report
.+ 3 Thera are 2,700 mite of single family developments in tracts b not
su yet
approved, but pending review for approval These units my be subject
to control by the city since they have not yet been approved to any
governmental JurledLction The Commit CO !a aware that the Planning
Cecral salsa desires applications which wouIdebersubject tos city t review re-
new development app the ci[ 'e growth
qufrements, design criteria, and most importantly, Y
management plan The approach recommended by the Planning Commission is
j applications a choice of denial or
re systematically with offer these pending app
reaubmittnl with proportionate anchor for Cucamonga already Inthisawayt theh2,700nty
prior to the incorporation of Rancho Cueawn0
units of unapproved tentatives would reappear as new applications and
would, subject to t
in theonear�fut nt criteria which
uro
x
RA,
i .
i
City Council
February 15, 1979
Page Three
7
4. The school districts support the concept of devalooing a comprehensive
growth management system as proposed by the Planning Commission.
5. The Committee clarified the difference between relocatable and portable
structures kelocatable structures are defined as non - temporary,
structures whose cost is equal to permanent structures However, the
structure may be relocated to another site at approximately 1/3 of
the cost of constructing a new classroom.
Portable structures are defined as highly relocatable structures
having their own floors. The present costs of portables or relocatables
are not significantly different. The cost has been estimated at between
$42,000 and $43,000 per unit with an additional $5,000 hook -up charge
The Committee wishes to note that the square footage cost for relocat-
able or portable structures is approximately equal to the square Eoo[age
coat for permanent classroom facilities. This figure excludes auxiliary
buildings which normally would be a major portion of a permanent school
site.
Central School Llstrlet — with the completion of the "Instant school"
and the purchaae of four additional temporary classrooms, the district
can accommdate without double sessions tl.a current enrollment, the
projected enrollment, the enrollment generated from the current vacant
homes, and the enrollment from the portion of the 556 units of approved
tentatives within the Central School District. It is significant to
note, however, that this includes the utilization of all available apace
for classroom purposes. The additional costs for the four temporary
classrooms is estimated at approximately $200,000. This estimate does
not include auxiliary facilities
Alta Loma School District -- with the completion of Stork School, one
half completicn of the proposed school on Hermosa, and the purchasu of
temporary classrooms the district can accommodate the current enrollment,
the projected enrollment from homes currently under construction, and
the projected number of students from the portion from the 556 single
family units which are located within the Alta Low School District It
is anticipated that all available space will be used for classroom pur-
pu.ea The cost for providing the eight required temporary classrooms
Is estimated at approximately $408,000 including cost for lease - purchase
and related hook -up expenses
8. The Chaffey High School District presently has the capacity within the
district to house the students generated by the 556 approved tentative
tract units.
9 The C=ittee wishes to reaffirm the fact that the collection of any
school impaction fees to resolve the current and projected student
impaction problem is an interim solution. It is essential that long -
range permantnt solution must come from other governmental entities
pa
FLUO
City Council
February 15, 1979
Pago Your
10 The Committee wishes to reaffirm the fact that in order to
provide temporary classroom facilities, each of the impacted school
districts will be taxing all of Its current resources as well as its
permanent facilities.
'1. The Committee has determined that the continuation of the building
moratoriun beyond N.arch 9 my adversely effect the city, the business
community, the employment market, and the school districts wTt `ni
our immediate vicinity. While most city revenues come from other
sources such as State or Federal governments, it is important to note
that a portion of the funds received by the city are generated from
various types of building activities, either as a result of increased
property tax assessments or through other fees collected If the
moratorium Is continued, the school districts wall face a loss of
revenue which may affect the ability of the districts to resolve -the
achool impaction problem. In order to generate school impnction _---
funds for classrooms, develo,raent must occur. However. with each
development a school district risks further compounding of its pro-
blem because of the increase in students which occurs with residential
development.
It is readily apparent that the continuation of the moratorium also
adversely affects the employment market within the Rancho Cucamonga
area. It Is estimated that approximately 500 citizens of Rancho
Cucamonga are employed in trades related to the building industry
If the moratorium is continued, many of these citizens may fare either
relocation or unemployment.
The Committee has determined that the continuation of the moratorium
may also have an adverse impact on the business eomvunity. It is
difficult, however, to precisely determine the extent to which the
business community would be affected by a moratorium. The Chamber of
Commerce has indicated that many business entities are located in
Rancho Cucamonga In anticipation of continued residential growth If
this growth does not occur, some businesses may be adversely Impacted
12. The concept of phasing the 556 single femil,r units as recommended by
the Planning Commission is reasonable and can be accommodated by
both the city and school districts providing sufficient funds are
collected
0
City Council
February 15, 1979
Page Five
13. The current fee of $700 per single family dwelling unit provides
insufficient funds to implement a satisfactory interim solution to
the school impaction problem. Appendix B indicates the funds which
would be generated to assiat each impacted district if the 556
single family units, proposed multi- family, and mobile borne units
are approved for construction Appendix B has computed the antici-
pated fees two ways% Chart A assumes that the fees are split bet-
ween the elementary districts and the high school district, and
Chart B assumes that all fees go to the elementary district in the
event the City Cour ^il determines that the Chaffey Joint Union High
School District is no longer Impacted.
14 The Committee wishes to state that any increases in school impaction
fees will be assessed to ddvalopers initially, but will be ultimately
passed on to home buyers and will result in increased caste for housing
in Rancho Cucamonga.
15 it is to the advantage of the school districts to have separate
arrangements with developers to collect fees directly in order to
maximize the use and costa for temporary facilities. The direct
financial arrangements with developers eliminatas the present three -
year limitation for retention of temporary structures on ecnool
sites.
1HUsbna
attach.
M
M-11-
A?PEMIX A
TOTALS:
Number of lots per tract maps: 2.142
Completed, unoccupied houses: 634
Houses currently under construction: 563
Graded pads (no construction): . 185
Approved tentatives 8 recorded maps: 08
Abandoned construction d lots in
litigation: 99
Occupied houses _ 573
Number of homes under construction, unoccupied houses: 1,197
• •
Ii
i
. .411 I
r
xr. x r
c
v = n
lO�w
•: r
i
II
F
Y
5
■
lal_
n
S t
5
R
lal_
11
}S }
7 y
9
M a
r « q
/vr..11. A
5 33eaf
ai��3•y-
E 6
i
E
�
_
7 A
1 �
t
8
E
f
M a
r « q
/vr..11. A
5 33eaf
ai��3•y-
a
� � a
5 Y
— F
5 E
atl �
S y
- -- _I If = =R _I _
t o3
C
3 S
�
c
s
n
„
i
K
q
i
g
- -- _I If = =R _I _
t o3
APPENDIX B
V
tlo
v
$�
�
b n
•
1
1
•�'
n
a
N
n
O
P
n
It
b
v
b
V
V
N
y
N
•y m
n b
n P
tl n
V
(Fyj
H
M
nn
N
ti
�Oy
W
O
(NV O
N N
N Y
u u
1
V t4 Y
i
'J Y
ry O
Y p
v e
N Gpg
I q
•� � a
N
tl
b
d
b
O
^�
m
d i
J rb1
4 V H
Vy Nn
�N
ry
•y 6 W
�O
1
n
O
�O
LI'.
n
O
b �
rl O
..
rl[WJJ�
e
S
V
H
M
P
1�
n
O
V
it
n
P
O b
•'1 P
b
n
O
n
mP
N
b
N
V
d O
n
p
d5 O
N N
N n
y4
V
U
N
6
V
1 1
U
10-•
C V
V N
1
l
V
aaoi
13 `
4y+g
d'N
'd S
*ad
aad
OSfS
00[S
IN
'd•S
aad
Mt
'd'N aad
OSSS
N]7A
aad
008$
'd'S aad
000
1,
u
M
H
O
w
Nag d
m
d
�w
LLu
V N
N
b�
w n
J d
N Y,
m
m
APPENotx a
1+.
71�
. -1
Ins
t.
t
m
O
+
P
1
O
+
i
L
0
0
O
v
1
v
n
�1
0
m
1+.
71�
. -1
Ins
t.
ss
V 1'1
v �
a
a
o
o
d
d
o
o
o
lu
a
a
c
a
e
u
u
i
P
M
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p1
P
V
O
Y
Q1
N
N
N
V
mm
V
b
V
r-1
1
O
O
r1
^
N
rl
V
N
fV
h
J
9
u
O
H
>.
a
e
.di 4 .yd
m U N
v
S
u
9
'u
1 1 1'.
U
H
w a: to
mib
'd'N
'd'S
aad O5C5
'd'H
aad
Mt
*AIR
aad Mgt
aad OOCS
'd'S aad 000
'A'S aad 000
J]�L
d
CITY /SCHOOL DISIRICTS
Pomona
Elsinore
Henephe
Marino
Murietta
New Vier
:dtV� Perris
Riverside
Temecula
Hemet
Rancho Cucamonga
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
SUHMARY•
High Fee 2,7.41
Low Fee 625
Average Fee 1,018
Median Fee 1,000
Rancho Cucamonga 700
I
0 APPENDIX C
SURVEY - SS201 USERS
FEE
$ 200 - 1,400
710
1,848
685
1,000
1,400
1,312
1,400
525
1,320
700
2,100
2,200
• 2/7/79
Prepared by R.C.P.O.
T.S.
NOW DETERMINED
Per I of Bedrooms
Per costa of temp. bldga.
.;f
t�
r Lit
Per results of 5 yr. cash flow analysis�S{
Per costa of temporary bldge.
Per type of dwelling unit
SB201 FEES NOT PRESENTLY UTILIZED IN FOLLOWING CITIES:
Upland
Riverside Rialto
Ontario
Lancaster San Bernardino
Clermont
Corona
LaVerne
Walnut
Fontana
Simi Valley
Chino
Victorville
M
U
i
0 1 •
H E H O R A N D U M
DATE: February 6, 1979
TO: Fact Finding Committee
FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman
City Manager
SUB.IECT: Beautification Fee
The Task Force ban asked the city staff to indicate the reasons why the city's
beautification fee should not be eliminated and added to the school fee which
is now $700 per single family unit. The primary rearon for the beautification
fee was to improve those areas of the city which were developed under the
County's jurisdiction prior to incorporation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Prior to enacting the beautification fee, it was the staff's view point that
some means must be found for financing the much needed landscaping and other
Stems which are essential in order to establish a positive impression of our
new city The areas of particular concern were Maven, the parkways along
Carnelian between the sidewalk and street, and other areas between walled
developments and the public streets The beautification fee of 20 cents per
square foot per unit was one means of generating sufficient amount of funds
to correct the city's landscaping deficiencies. At the time: the fee was enacted,
It was felt that the developers should be somewhat agreeable to correcting the
many dlfficiencies in ou. community since moat developments were approved with-
out consideration for the aesthetic qualities they bring to the community.
The Fact Finding Committee faces a difficult decision. Obviously it is diffi-
cult to compare the needs of our school -aged children with the need for more
trees and other landscaping to beautify a community. Both are important for
the long -range development of the community It would appear that at least
one option available to the Committee and ultimately to the City Council would
be to adjust the school fees so that sufficient funds are generated to pay
for the portable classrooms which are needed. Rancho Cucamonga's fee of $700
per unit is probably lover than the fee charged in most Southern California
cities which are utilizing SB -201 to finance school classrooms on an interim
basis The city established a $700 school fee at a time when portable class-
room costs were approximately $25,000 per unit As the Committee is aware, the
cost has now increased to approximately $40,000 per unit. An adjuatment may,
therefore, be appropriate.
Another concern of the staff is that if the beautification fee 1s eliminated,
it will be extremely difficult to reassess it at a later date While it Is
easy to say now that the fee would simply be reinstated In a year, it is quite
likely that the fee would not be reinstituted without a major controversy and
considerable opposition from the developers who are press king in Rancho
Cucamonga. In addition, it ie possible that thane may 6 m e s of the City
Council serving one year from new.
07
In summary, the staff ppsltion concerning the beautification fee is we
are reluctant to see the City Council eliminate the fee which is now being
charged since it will be extremely difficult to reassess that fee at a
later date While certainly the need for additional classrooms is extremely
important to our community, we also fee that the ultimate beautification of
our city should be of concern to our residents. the beautification fee was
one innovative method of generating the funds necessary to improve the image
of the city. It does not seem appropriate to divert that fee for other
purposes. Perhaps a more practical solution would be to adjust the present
school fee to reflect the recent cost increase for portable classrooms.
MI. m
cc: City Council
J I=
1D%
a •
H E H 0 R A N D U M
DATE: February 15, 1979
TO: City Council 6 City Manager
rROH: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SUBJECT: Contract with John Blayney for Industrial Area Specific Plan
As per the discussions between staff and the City Council at the previous
Council meeting, the Chamber of Commerce is funding a specific plan for the
industrial areas of the city. As part of this program, the specific plan
will be divided into two phases; the latter being the actual specific plan
with detailed development standards and the first stage concentrating
primarily upon a detailed circulation plan for the industrial areas.
The industrial community and the Chamber of Commerce has found an urgency
to the development of this specific plan due primarily to development
pressures within certain portions of the planning area that necessitate
decislons regarding a street network. On Wednesday, February 14, the
Industrial Committee of the Chamber of Commerce endorsed the first phase
scope of work as attached to this staff report and has requested the Board
of Directors of the Chamber of Commerce to have an emergency session prior
to the City Council meeting to have that group specifically endorse the pro-
posal
John Blayney and Associates is now preparing contractural documents for the
City Council's review and approval However, because of the short time
frame Involved and the urgency as expressed by the Chamber of Commerce, we
cannot have the contract ready by the time the packets are sent out. We
will have the contract document prepared prior to the meeting so that you
can have an opportunity to review it before the meeting.
Again, this has been deemed an urgency issue by the Chamber of Commerce
However, If the City Council is not comfortable with the quickness of the
decision necessary , please indicate so to staff This whole matter has been
referred to the City Council as an urgency item out of courtesy to the Chamber
of Commerce. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me
ctfully eu 1pitted,
---:
Jack Lam
Director of Community Development
JL:cc
i bi
.'
February 7, 1979 e
(Revised February 9)
To: Jack Lam
From: John Blayney
Subject: Stage I, Industrial Areas Specific Plan
• John Blayncy Asx ialcs
Udun and Regional Planncn
JuhnA
Rahart W 01mer, A. 1.1'.
Mo.had V Dycu. A.I.P.
The following proposal is Intended to conform to your request for a program
that can resolve circulation issues in Areas A and B as quickly as possible within
a maximum budget of $40,000. We understand that the Industrial Committee
or the Chamber of Commerce has requested a two-stage program to meet
urgent development pressures, while allowing additional time to raise funds
to complete the Specific Plan.
We agree that the largest share of the budget will be needed for the traffic
studies and many of the elements of the Specific Plan will have to await Stage
11. JBA's role, In addition to coordination, will be to determine the needs for _
access (rail and street) to all holdings, to formulate assumptions about employment
density and trip generation, and to participate In the design of the circulation
system. DeLeuw Cather will test alternative systems using a network sufficiently
detailed to predict Impacts outside Arens A and 0 as well as within. L.D.
King will evaluate the drainage and (toed control Implications of alternative
circulation plans.
Budgets for Areas A and B together are as follows:
JBA DCCO LDR Total
Stage 16,000 20,000 4,000 40,000
Stage It 24,000 10,000 18,000 55,000
Totals 40,000 33,000 22,000 95,000
Stage I Is described In the following work scope Stage It wculd Include all
remaining work to complete the Specific Plan as described in our proposal
of January 9, 1979. The slightly higher total budget ($2,000 additional) is needed
to allow for the separate product (plan amendment) at the end of Stage I that
is likely to be revised during Stage It. If Stage It is authorized before completion
of Stage 1, it may be possible to eliminate this cost.
1171'.,.1 %INVI.Sult: 751)
\in I t.u,,1ko.CA n41M
111514!1.7735
))D
Jack Lam • •
February 7, 1979
Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK: STAGE I
1. Detailed Work Program
Prepare detailed work program and time schedule for Stage I after existing
data Is reviewed, and further discussion with City and spokespersons for
owners /agents/occupants. (JBA, DCCO, I.DK).
2. Priority TrafficwaysStudy
To accomodale current development pressures, priority will be given to
resolving alternatives for east -west lraffieways through Areas A and
D with the objective of making specific recommendations by March 15,
before the citywide traffto model will be operational. (DCCO, JBA, LDK)
3. Basic Data
A. Interview interested owners /agents/occupants WBA)
B. Collect aaallable geologic and soils data, locations and capacities
of utilities Rnes, rail trackage. (JBA)
C. Collect data on existing and anticipated employment densities as
a basis for projecting traffic generations. (JBA)
D. Prepare basic data map on existing in = 500' County Surveyor's base
showing land use, parcel boundaries, existing or adopted street right
of way lines (with dimensions), major utilities locations and sizes,
drainage ways, flood hazards, rail trackage. (non - reproducible). (JBA,
LDK)
E. Prepare working map showing development proposals approved, under
consideration, or public but not formally submitted. (non - reproducible).
(JBA)
F. Prepare detailed traffic model for entire City Incorporating earlier
work by San Bernardino County. The model will allow testing of
alternative land uses and development schedules, and also will be
capable of evaluating alternative roadway configurations such as
deletion of the Foothill Freeway or of a portion of a major arterial
such as Milliken Avenue. Such a model is an essential basis for sound
decisions on a trafficwnys system within the industrial area.
O. Review existing Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan and flood hazards
data. (LDK)
John BlayneyAtweiata
U,ban and Regional Planners
Jack Lam
February 7, 1979
Page 0
q. Sketcl Plans for Traffleways and Rail Access Alternatives
A. Prepare alternative traffleways networks and rail trackage configurations
for testing, including Foothill Freeway alternatives and alternatives
within Areas A and B. requested by owners /developers/ Assign 10
year and build -out residential commercial Intensites in sufficient
detail to determine trip generation compatibility with drainage and
flood control requirements. (JBA, DCCO, LDK)
B. Test alternatives and evaluate feasibility of each. Traffic service,
ease of acquiring right of way, construction costs, potential for segre-
gating residential and industrial area traffic, and Impacts on drainage
and flood control costs will be evaluated, but cost estimates will
not be prepr:,ed. (DCCO, LDK, JBA)
5. General Plan Amendment -
Based on comments received, prepare a single plan suitable for adoption
as on amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan. Amen-
dments to the Land Use Element also may be necessary, although It would
be desirable to wait and amend the Land Use Element to achieve consistency
with the Industrial Area Specific Plan at the time the Specific Plan Is
ready for adoption. (end of Stage II).
If preparation of the Specific Plan has been authorized and Stage It
can be completed on a schedule acceptable to the City, separate amendment
of the Circulation Elemement may not be necessary. (JBA, DCCO, LDK)
8. Environmental Assessment
Prepare an environmental assessment. It is anticipated that a negative
declaration (absence of major adverse Impacts) can be Issued for a General
Plan amendment. If preparation of an EIR is required, additional
budget may be necessary.
7. Public Meetings. Hearings, Adoption
Attend not more than four meetings of the Industrial Committee, the
Planning Commission, and the City Council to present the preliminary
and proposed plans.
8. Publication
Publish 50 copies or an illustrated report describing, the studies, describing
the recommended General Plan amendment, and Including the environmental
assessment.
John Blayney Associates
Urban and Regional Planners
112-
February 9, 1979
Rancho Cucamonga City Council
P O Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730
City Council,
Enclosed is a copy of the notice informing me of the date
for my public hearing, regarding zone change p 103 -67. I did not
receive a second notice informing me that the date of the public -
hearing had been changed from January 17, 1979 to January 15, 1979.
Due to the circumstance that I was not informed of the change,
I'am requesting that another hearing date be set for my appeal
before tb City Council of Rancho Cucamonga
'C
Louis R. Parks car,
E
CITY OF P N1.0 UCA CUC1!
AOM.IfIISTft. I [ON
FEB 131979
AM
7!13ffllmltfll1j1f2f31913i0
Ili.
V, - .
FURUC
The Rancho Cucnmonga C1t�,r' Council +ill
7:00 o.m. on January 17. .1979*Itti ens c
- '�- -Ow= U noting i•f'Soptomber •,,.�t'submitted', ;••e:'�
b• ,.nuts m. 1'.,rkr. - iq,u Ch7nge \o
Anyone objer• 6tg to or in 'nvor of the above, n.: + ••Ar in person at the -
above descrf —d meet Ing ar +•nv sulmit their cox - - writing to the City
Clerk, C1ty Rancho Cuem+•,gn
DATE: January 4, 1979 ''+macho Cuenaonga
Council
e E C I 1®;'F1
CITY U RANCHO CUCAMONCA
ADN.INISTNRTION
rE313 1979
7 819Iro1U11211t2131415 6
6
11 �•
0 0
CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 21, 1979
TO: City Council 4 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubba, City Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING PARCEL NAP NO. 4788
The attached resolution is for the approval of a 2 lot Parcel Map on the
Routh side of La Sends Road vest of Carnalian Street.
This map was tentatively approved by the County on February 23. 1978 and
subsequently transmitted for final by the City.
Recomenndation:
It is recommended that the City approve the attached resolution authorizing
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City.
Rea ec[fully au m /i, /tyte /_d�
Llo B Iiubba
CSC Engineer
LEH:JLN:cc
115
• r
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -1`5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COIIi1CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NIRBER 4788
(TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP 110. 77- 0450).
WHEREAS, tentative parcel reap number 1, submitted by Associated
Engineers and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of
La Senda Road west of Carnelian being a division of Cucamonga Homestead
Association was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga; and,
4HEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the final map by the County of San Bernardino have now been
met;
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City —
of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Yap Number 4788 be
and the is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record.
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979.
City Clerk
Mayor
ItY
4111e:
SLAND DIVIStCN APPLICATION '•
NARDINO COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
%J iF jZ<O1r9110d /J' �fc O ✓.'.C.EA
,4p fe✓ le4ep /�Y1�Rn ✓fr•1F..� qtP eo- ,irr,�ucrEO. TiYi
A ✓L�ii:.e
/.,,o ' lxo/ is rryvit�' s/i o %/ 6i a� ri.r� a ��''•
of '4A d- P c✓ '&* rrAv.. 'e"01
�hlsril�7 P�' ►Vlgi'I� Rono•
---LA SS-IOD9
r�
ao
M
I
l
I
1
I
I I
S32p70 t�g�
nil
�I
I
I
1. J7:.�' 131 I "
ExlsTlu9 '�—.
SvRvsl Pipf-
IEOALi au;EoOnZ yR.E/ CG RD: G- /'/! 9 /l0/
yl
Nue%6llG
Phone Sra.nE •N
Address- S Amt _ A A R b n U —_
Irv)
o
t�l
n
L EXISTING TN"
sukVL�' /�SGO
M.y
PIPE Sul,
P!I7[i Use Only)
L. D NOfO �,e
FEE RECEIPT
To:
From:
Re:
s
Lauren Wasserman
Bill Holley
M E M O R A N D U M
Lions Park Community Service Center
0
Date: February 15, 1979
The awarding of Roberti- Z'berg Urban Open Space and Recreation Grant
(SB 174) to Rsncho Cucamonga today, for the above referenced project,
requires the project be returned to Council for additional consideration
and action
As indicated in the informational memo to yourself and Council on
January 8, the maximum amount of grant funding available had been
ruduced in our category from $350,000 to $200,000 This reduction
of State funding would, therefore, require that the financial commitment
by the CiLy be increased to facilitate completion of the project. A
comparison of the original submission to the current situation follows:
As Submitted
State - $258,525
City - 86,175
Project Total $344,700
As Awarded
State - $200,000
City - 144,700
Project Total $344,700
As these figures indicate, the increase to the City would total $58,525
In discussion with -C arry Empey, the additional funding is available
from Accourt 41 -50 L (Park Development Fees)
Digressing, for a moment, several observations are in order regarding
the grant award
1) This project, in Statewide competition, was awarded 107
of the total money available, giving maximum credence,
through an unbiased evaluation, to its merit and priority
2) I have discussed with many local residents and groups
including the Advisory Committees, the proposed project
and it has been met with unqualified support
3) Assemblyman Terry Gogggin is doing a fine job as an advocate
of Rancho Cucamonga Ln Sacramento, and should be recognized
and thanked
-1 1,19
page 2 + •
demo
2/15/79
To: L.W
From: B H.
Re: Lions Park Communtity Service Center
To the point, Council should consider the following options:
1) Increasing funding for construction from $86,175 to
$144,700 (an increase of $58,525); or
2) Reducing scope of project; or
3) Not accept SB 174 funding, and compete for future
grant funding in attempt to secure high outside
participation
Staff Recommendation: Exercise option number 1, increasing City
participation to $144,700, based on: _
1) The citizens needs which will be met by the
completed project,
2) The City will be able to puwhase the project
for 42q on the dollar; and
3) The "bid climate" at this time is in the City's
favor.
Request an agenda date for February 21 for Council consideration
of this matter
I
dl/mw
s
-2-