Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/03/07 - Agenda PacketAGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting March 7, 1979 I I. CALL TO ORDER. 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG. 3 ROLL CALL: Iiikels_,, Palombc , Schlosser, West_, Frost 4, APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 1, 1979. S. ANNOUNCEMENTS. 6 CONSENT CALENDAR: The following Consent Calendar Items ate expected to be routine and non- controversial. whey will be acted upon by the Council one time without discussion Any Council member, staff member, or Interested patty any re. guest that an Item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion. a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $101,116 34 .............. ..... I b. Request from Office of Community Development, San Bernardino.. 7 County, to set a.date for a public hearing for March 21 regarding-- . — a cooperative agreementc.between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Housing Authority. C. Request to accept bids and purchose stack chairs for the Cucamonga... 10 Neighborhood Facility. This item is included in current 78 -79 Budget approval by Council. (d) Set public hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -0, Sign Ordinance - for March 21, 1979. (e) Tract 9321: Release bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc ......... .....Y1 3 Performance Bond (sewer) $ 76,000 Performance Bond (water) $ 54,000 Performance Bond (road) $154.000 ` (f) Tract 9315: Release bonds to John D. Lusk b Son ...... ... ... .... 13 Performance Bond (sewer) S 16,000 Performance Bond {water) $ 20,000 Performance Bond (road) $ 80,000 �S (g) Tract 9256: Release bonds to R. L Sievers 6 Sons Inc 14 ............. Performance Bond (water $ 58,000 �,, Performance Bond (road) $ 90,000 City Council Agenda (h) Tract 9398: (i) Tract 9450 (J) Tract 9449: (k) Tracts 9586: and 9587: 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: -2- March 7, 1979 Release bonds to Proud Construction Corporation Performance Bond (fewer) S 13,000 Performance Bond (water) $ 16,000 Release bonds to Crowell /Leventhalt, inc .............. 17 Performance Bond (sewer) $ 33,000 Performance Bond water) $ 46,000 Performance Bond (( road) $114,OGO Release bond to Thompson Assoc. Development Corp..... 19 Performance Bond (road) $152,000 Release of bonds to Thompson Assoc. Develop Corp ...... 20 Landscaping S Block fall $ 74,894.88 A. Zone Chance No. 87 -78 submitted by Jerry Rodgers Changing the zone from FP -2 (Flood Plain) to A -P (Administrative - Professional) for property located on the south side of Baseline, 775' west of Vineyard Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 62 (Second Reading) . .. ... ........... .... ... 22 f4 AN 04DINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO . ' CUC0.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 207 - �( 031 -19 FROM FP -2 10 A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASELINE APPROXIMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. B iRDTHANCE NO. 63 (Second Reading) .......... ....... ... ....... 23 t AN OP.DINAUCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO L•�- CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND LICENSING _PROC90URES FOR THE KEEPING, OF DOGS AS PETS WITHIN THE CITY. C Arrdi � forl e Establishment of Storm Drain and Systems The Cornunity Development Department is proposing for adoption the establishment of a storm Drain fee of $2,500 per acre to be applied to land divisions and the issuance of building permits and a Systems Development fee of one percent (15 on the building valuation to be assessed at the time of development. These fees will be used for the exclusive purpose of Planning, Engineering and constructing street and storm drain facilities. City Council Agenda -3- March 7, 1979 i, / REnnSOLUilOtl N0. 79 -10 ......... .. ...... ........ .................. 20 AIRESOL ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO A GA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS OEYELOPOFFNT FEE ��Ue�U1 -v I LCORDANCE NiT1{ ORDINANCE N0. 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO UCAMONGA. ORDINANCE N0. 65 lency) ............. ........................ 29a__. AN OR INA{ICE OF THE L COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU ONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 53 TO REVISE - ORM DRAIN FEE REQUIREMENTS ON PARCEL MAP AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF , �- ORDINANCE NO. 60 (First Reading) . •••••• ............••.... -1 �ONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO AMONGA, C PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN J V/ CONNECTION THEREWITH I D An- eat by Poly Plastics Products requesting Waiver of - 1 na a cub........ ..... ........... ... .._33_ ORDINAN , *O. 61 (Second Reading) .. ............................... ?7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. An appeal by Poly Plastics'Products requesting-waiver of Drainage- - Fees on property located at 10220:Fourth_Street.-:Rancho- Cucam=g= — ' E. Zoning Ordinance Nnendment tlo. 79 -02 - Amendin the Home...... .37 ccuoat on ect ons o tie on Ri r nonce. ORDINANCE H0. -66 (First Reading) .. ...................... ...... y \\ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO uUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT " NO. 79 -02 WHICH REPEALS SECTION 61.025A(b)3, AMENDS SECTION 61.022 AND ADDS SECTION 61.0219(a)9 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 17. F. lone Chan a No. 97 -65 and 98-65 - Van uard - A change. _... .........• 57 �C o. zone from R- -8 00 to R-3 for 9.3 acres of land located !'r on the northeast corner o +r mona an 19t". ORDINANCE NO. 67 (First Reading) ... ..... 59 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 202- 171 -47 (ZC 97 -65 S 98 -65) City Count11 Agenda -4- rarch D, 1979 Ir CITY tIAAA6F.R'S STAFF REPO:RS A. Nisi[ —a Part: Request authorization to permit Alta ................ 60 lae Riding Club to taporarily locate riding ring at Heritage Part - by Sfll Holley. B. A2pro21 of Parcel Rap 4M ........... ............................... 61 RfSOLOf1Od 00. 79-15 A RFSOLUM" OF THE rM CDML OF 11E CITY OF RNOW CUGVVM, CALIFORNIA. APPRMfIG PARCEL FVP KIM 4M (MIFATIVE PAMM KIP NO. 4865) � " C. Apprvral of draft ameermt rfth Camtr Flood fa�tral ................ 6Z U��� ar coostrrution of brfdgc over Cucammga Creek. D. Authwization for rayur to sign zgreemfnt behreen Cbzaber ............ *83 of Commerce and City for t��he��pprreepp�t�Katipo o�� t�he, eciffc — plan for the lydustrfaiiar+6�s"�slju on fF.e larfd -use - eleaart of the 6eneral'Plan. 9. CITY AIFORET'SP.EPW - School -Fee Resolution 70. AEH MIXES a. Council ,9 71- I b. Audfewe - 11. Aal&X Z MM RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tr_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESO- LUTION NO. 78 -64 WHICH CONCURRED IN THE DECLARA- TION OF IMPACTION ADOPTED BY THE CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT WITH RESPECT TO THE ALTA LAMA HIGH SCHOOL. WHEREAS, the City has been advised by the Chaffey Joint Union High School District that it is unable to give the City the information required by Government Code Section 65976 and Section 10 of City of Rancho Cucamonga Ordinance No. 30; and, , WHEREAS, it appears that there is a feasible method in mitigating conditions of overcrowding within the Alta Loma _ High School attendance area by transporting the 9th grade class from Alta Loma High School to other high schools within tho Chaffey Joint Union High School District for the school year 1979 -80. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of lancho Cucamonga, California, does resolve as follows: The City Council hereby revokes its concurrence in the Declaration of Impaction which was adopted by the Bonid of Trustees of the Chaffey Joint Union High School District on October 16, 1978, and Resolution No. 78 -64 adopted by the City Council on November 1, 1978, is hereby rescinded. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: city Clerk -1- Mayor f a � i RESOLUTION NO. ( — r7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE FURTHER PROCESSING OF COUNTY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAPS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, t; does hereby resolve as follows: ti SECTION 1. This reso7 scion shell apply only W those tentative tract maps which were approved by he County of San Bernardino prior to incorporation, which are hereinafter listed by tentative tract number $n Ft Section 6 of this sometimes referred to ast "approveddtentative mpg are hereinafter tracts ", SECTION 2. No final map with respect to an approved tentative ' tract shall be filed, or further processed if already filed, unless a new application for processing of the find. map is filed with the City. - Final maps Shall be accepted and processed, or further processed, in the rR order in which new applications for processing are received. There shall be no phasing for final map submission, approval or recordation Final maps shall be allowed to record when all requirements of the Subdivision Hap Act, the Subdivision Ordinance and the conditions of approval of the approved tentative tract have been met, and all applirable fees have been paid w•, qt SECTION 3. Plans :or building perm![ plan check may be sub - &y pitted after recordation of a plant sup• permits no more upon successful completion f inn check, p than the allocated number of building permits stall be Sasucd during any calendar month SECTION 4. The number of building permits that are allocated (� during any calendar month shall be seventy -five (75) plus the unused allocation, if any, from the preceding calendar months. The monthly allocation shall commence upon the date of adoption of this Resolution i SECTION S. In the event at any time :the building for ' building permits exceed the allocation available, the building official shall use the priority list set forth in Section 6 of this Resolution to determine the order of building permit issuance d SECTION 6. The approved tentative tract*, which are the subject of this Resolution, in order of priority are as follows: a) Tract 9472; b) Tract 9479; c) Tract 9480; d) Tract 9193; `y e) Tract a62; f) TracL 7387; g) Tract 9454; a: h) Tract 9434; n� s 1) Tract 9435; J) Tract 9436; k) Tract 9437; 1) Tract 9567; m) Tract 9637; n) Tract 9638; o) Tract 9589; p) Tract 9264; q) Tract 9423. SECTION 7. Applications for grading permits may be submiLted after recordation of the final mnp. Grading permits m.. be Secued upon approval of grading plane by the Building Official and City Engineer, and upon payment of all applicable fees. I::ere is .:o phasing for issuance of grading permits. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTESI: City Clerk RESOL'1TION NO. 79 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR TPE LICENSING OF ROCS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, the law of the State of California requires that dogs kept within the State be licensed NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall impose a fee requirement for the licensing of dogs. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following charges are _ established: 1 For each tale dog, ten and no /100ths ($10 00); 2 For each neutered male dog, with proof of neutering, five and no /100ths ($5.00); 3 For each spayed (neutered) female dog with proof of spaying, five and no /100ths ($5.00); end 4. For each unappyed female dog, ten and no /100ths ($10 00) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a penalty in the amount of five and no /100ths ($5.00) shall be added to each license fee for failure to pay such fee within thirty (30) days after such license fee shall fall due. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the owner of any dog, which owner moves into the City from another community, upon the presentation of a rabies vaccination receipt signed by a licensed veterinarian and a license receipt from another cos unity for the current year, may be Segued a Rancho Cucamonga license tag upon the payment of one and no /100th ($1 00) to ewer the coat of the tag Bt IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between July 1 and December 31 of the current year shall be subject to the regular annual license fee. Any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between January 1 and March 31 shall be subject to one -half (y) the annual license fee. Any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between April 1 and June 30 shall be subject to one - fourth (it) the annual license fee j Se� f a 6 i 9 76 S� ORDINANCE N0. 62 1. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IME CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONINC ASSESSOR'S PARCEL, NO 207- 031 -19 FROM FP -2 TO A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE OP BASELINE APPROXIMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby 2inds and determines the following: a. That the Planning Commission of till City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommendo the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and thin City Council Man hold a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and has duly heard - and considered said recommendation. b. That this rezoning 1s consiatent with the Cenral Plan of r'u 'Sty of Rancho Cucamonga present and propoued c That this rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact and a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Commission on January 10, 1979 SECTION 2: The following desrribed real property is hereby rezoned in :ha manner state, and the zoning map in hereby amended accordingly. FP -2 (Flood Plain) to AP (administrative professional) Said property is located on the south aide of Baseline, approximately 800' east of Carnelian known as Assessor Parcel 207 - 031 -19. This Ordinance shall be In full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after Its adoption. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 7th day'Of'March 1979. mayor —' ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman City Clerk ! /-_ ORDINANCE NO. 63 AN ORDIUMCE OF-THE CITY COUNCIL-OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONUA,,CALI ANIA ,EST%SHING REGIIJ,.AIIONS"AND LICINS74G PROCEDURES OR -144. KEEPING OF DUGS AS PET 91THIN THE CITY SECTION 1. For the purposes of this article, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this article are defined as follows: a. 'Commercial kennel" shall mean any place, other than a private kennel, where four (4) or more dogs over four (4) months of age are kept. b. "Enforcing officer" shall mean the City Manager, the Police Chief, the Humane office, the City Health officer, or such other person as the Council may designate. SECTION 2. Vaccination and licenses: Required. Each dog over the age of four (4) months harbored within the City shall be vaccinated for rabies and licensed. The owner or harborer of such dog shall be required to present to the Enforcing officer, upon request, a valid license and vaccination certificate signed by a licensed veterinarian. Such vaccination shall be made each year unless a chick - embryo vaccine approved by the Department of Public Health of the State has been given by a licensed veterinarian within two (2) years. SECTION 3. Licenses: Places of procurement. Licenses shall be available at the License Bureau in the City hall and at the Dog Pound. SECTION 4. Licenses: Fees: Penalties. a. Dog license fee are hereby set by resolution. SECTION 5. Licenses: Applications: Issuance: Form. Upon the receipt of the required license fee accompanied by an application in writing giving the name and address of the owner or possessor of the dog and a brief description of the dog, the Enforcing officer shall issue and deliver to such person a license certifying the payment of such fee and setting forth the sname and address of the application, a brief description of the dog, and the number allotted to such dog. -' J • • SECTION 6. Tags: Issuance. At the time of the issuance of a dog license, the Enforc- ing Officer shall deliver to the applicant for such license a metal tag which shall set forth the date of expiration of the license. SECTION 7. Tags: Maintenance on dogs. It shall be the duty of the owner or harborer of the dog for which a tag is issued, to maintain such tag on such dog. SECTION E. Leashes. No person owning or harboring any dog within the City shall permit such dog, whether licensed or not, to be upon any public street, sidewalk, lane, alley, court, or any other public place or upon any private property or premises, other than those of the person owning or having control or custody of such dog, except when such dog is held under by an able- bodied and competent person. _ SECTION 9. Vicious dogs. the City. No person shall harbor or keep any vicious dog within SECTION 10. Rabies examinations. a. Biting dogs: Quarantine. Whenever it is shown that any dog has bitten any person, the owner or person having the custody or possesion of such dog shall, upon the order of the City Health Officer or his authorized agent, quarantine the dog and keep it securely chained for a period of ten (10) days, ano shall permit the City Health Officer or his representative to make an inspection or examination of such dog at any time during such period. 0„arantined dogs shall not be removed from the premises without the permission of the City Health Officer. The City Health Officer, in the interest of protecting the person bitten, may order the dcg quarantined for a period of twelve (12) days at the owner's expense at the City Pound or at a licensed veterinary hospital. b. Dogs having or suspected of having rabies. The En- forcing Officer or any of his deputies shall have the right to seize any dog within the City having or suspected cf having rabies and cause the same to be examined by the City Health Officer, and it shall be the duty of the City Health Officer to examine the dog for the purpose of determining if such dog is afflicted with rabies. c. Release of rabies -free dogs. If it shall be determined that such dog does not have rabies, it shall be returned to the owner or person harboring the dog. ��d 7 r • • SECTION 11. Impoundment. a. Unlicensed duty of the Enforcing Offic a Officer to impound any 9dog for swhich ba license is required if such dog shall not be wearing the dog license tag Provided for in this article or any dog running loose upon a public street, side walk, lane alley, court, or other public place or upon any private property or premises, other than those o£ the person owning or having control or custody of such dog, and the Enforcing Officer shall keep the dog impounded until claimed, de- stroyed, or otherwise disposed of. b. Release to owners: Fees. The owner or possessor of the dog so impounded may reclaim such dog upon the payment of the required license fee and Ten and no /100ths ($10.00) dollars pickup fee for the first offense. Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) Dollars pickup fee for the second offense within six (6) months of the prior offense, Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) dollarb pickup fee for the third offense within six (6) months of the second offense plus boarding fees in the amount of Two and no /100ths ($2.00) e311ars for the first day and for each additional day the dog is impounded. c. Adoption: Disposal. If a dog shall have been impounded for a period of three (3) days and shall not have been reclaimed by the owner, the Enforcing Officer may, in lieu of killing such dog, offer the dog for adoption. The Enforcing Officer may, however, with the approval of a licensed veterinarian or Humane Officer of the State, humanely destroy any impounded animal on the same day it is impounded if the animal is in great pain or discomfort duo to an injury or infectious disease which may contaminate and be detrimental to the health of the other animals at the animal shelter. d. Destruction. If an impounded dog is not claimed at the expiration of such three (3) day period, it shall be the duty J. the :nfo�cin3 Officer to cause such dog to be destroye4e if not otherwise dinposed of. In such event, such dog may be held for an additional time not to exceed ten (10) days. %,ECTION 12. Commercial kennels: Liceunes: Required: Fees. Every person engaging in the business of operating a commercial kennel as defined in subsection (a) of Section 1 of this article, shall obtain a license from the License Official and shall pay an annual license fee for each calendar year, or part of such calendar year. SECTION 13. Commercial kennels: Licenses: Revocation. ' The License Official shall have the power, upon giving ten (10) days' notice by United State Mail to any commercial kennel licensee, to revoke any liccnsn granted to such commercial kennel operator for violations of the provisions of this article. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 7th day of March , 1979. AYES: Schtcsser. Mlkels, Palomuo, West NOES: None ABSENT: Fros: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman C ty C ark :., V. ^• tiir a 4 Mayor .._ - 4_' .. .. _ ✓c Aa 1 y° K :, 1 ✓f.�x�t.: �Jtc� L.� C+a.._�� '.�'ip 0. - -- aa V. rrt I%J,t -�� - ✓i. '_Ltc L =CP �c: r. Ltf�`_(%i _ _ — 6'e x cz�: t� L_ — i / 1 I ' �tJ �AS.Ei� _ �,.• :� •,.ct,,.4_. .0.x4.1_- .�41nt:k@/�_ _4`(t._`��.t�.::. K C-t CLt _L6J_z_.cr', - 1?.2u-LU L"__ `t kdk - ^e Fy t '4r- L��.✓� J.. r'�.�..L�{Y(ji'_ � VJ�JVW- _v!�Y �.�ewlti- _� _ _ /n/"'��L _ �i.�•{A� - \\::--- r,YU- 11[.IJ+VI[ ...1lNr�.�r�V I_ �- '=✓ ✓-14— r VIi)'� �CJ7 — L[ti.�— . —�.t tax:, �t_ A J _ --- ✓ �C cirf uL �kK�,t -o.2 -dts, _ x..45 -,•t1 lryh6it,� . — — MAC 1 — _ _YC.. ✓�— tAU.a.n �L 1�� l�l h , � C� G `{ 7 _ Q''� .ry.ya�icl r - —_ — IV nil,, "��.��:jc....a- ✓ G['l\ -= .�:�c.��� �j`/'ic!!•r '�J _� /1���SlJ_.l� `•� �' � � =.� -- ... ' ;:,��' c�.�I� JV__ �1%±.�i!C1,.uYCLUt' 4 __ QS/__"•,�_ _��� � — �fd.Y.t'f?U. �, . �[ „ r p2L;:QSi1..�:Tl't�'1!C.�1 - -- .� ��Jy J�Vk ... LL�JLC :+^. i• ".2Li�Ctei._ ✓_ G- S.LQ��L�. -- _ _— - _ a(tincu IL — - -'. pyi, __ rvry a. r. l IF:- 3s!`: :58325 i K - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- -�- OAA ! - -�� - -- - - - - - -- -- P1bad- a4- - -_ -- - - 7f `-' - - -- - 4 t f- c 1.l � .' • l � � r � I AIM / � 1 r .� . ri In r w.. / / r r -- -- - - -- -LA - - )(77:7, - _ --t(' cm., a � q , - u- i ^'Silto ro / i a ffAC ue 04CO VO 1 �( Cy Y�1 � / ` . Y� e �e a R - -- i clu VVI t� _ ev Y z. i;. �r A- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOt'GA MEMORANDUM DATE, March 7. 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hutba, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PARCEL HAP 4875 Attached for approval and acceptance of bonds is Parcel Nap 4875 locabed on the southeast corner of Archibald and Art" This is the cite of the pro- ' posed shopping center and Jack -in -the -Box restaurant RECOMMENDATION: Council pass Resolution No 79 -15 approving Parcel Hap 4875 and accepting bonds. R,spectfully submitted , LL BS v� Ci Engineer LH:deb I 9 ,+ RESOLUTION NO 79 -I5 RESOLUTION APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4875 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 4875 IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROTEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4875 , submitted by Hellman Avenue Associates , and consisting of three parcels, located on the south side of Arrow between Archibald and Malvern , being a division of a oortion of Cucamonga Lands was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4875 is the final map of the division of land approved as shorn on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prorequsite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by Hellman Avenue Associates as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and said improvement security submitted by said developoz t and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4875 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 19_ Cy Clerk of the City O Rinrinn furannnrn fniI fnrnin „ 3t. i �♦ Q I F+ LLJ it Lu E �j,• / 7 , i- ).1 r a JEj` r � ` r 1 e r =F ^ S4�— 3 5 're A:Jc 1 w, 114 .41pl, r�� 7`l- Ili RESOLMI ION NO 79 -, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROV INGN PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4875. WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4875, submitted by Hellman and Associates and consisting of three parcels, located on the south side of Arrow between Archibald and Malvern being a division of a portion of Cucamonga Lands was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel hap Number 4875 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have nw been met; - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 4875 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record ATTEST: PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1079 C ray er Mayor 0 zl u w U ������rnnr1111 vrpll0000e� 0000 v°io o 0 1°n uhi� � o m Im•1 rr h1fl00 Pr OO mh Ph .fl Q N 1.1 NN Nrl m b M m Q H N 00 Mt7 OM10v dN✓ih N 1.1h OI ./ h m m <Y N N ri t•1 ./ N N Np rl •I .1111MMMVVV"' N Kx N r-I r- 1111111!lINNNfff G O xauG ° mm w� C C G M 0 P m v G w� OI 1 W U .i m CP w tl1 0 W U •-N �1 $d i1 t O O O Q m m m... G H 0s �ppE7JJO O \•"ICS OOOU O. •�tl'0 0 V Y \ A.G AI HI fN•IN +GI• ttll \Fi ma PPPP G. -In00. m G t7 Z 1 W 10 C 0 7 O B N• al 4NO010 d mU.l l I.y3 z O 4 W x 7 x O W O H it \ N O O U M 0 F Gs s• d X U H tl YI ..� q a t mNm 0.m U m U ~ri My Mh M a q• H U U U P G\ H H.y1GG \H 7Mm 0.' w d Gp .� .-1 it as m: s s 7 O CG �0 0 0 S h pmj O x ,•Hj • a x .-1 w ..tli x ri w w F V x PZUStGaa It yaVy KNH M p/ wux OP r F mm m YIN 10 P N O. 1.1 Q Q PP m• m H F N N N N N N N .•1 N N f•1 T N N N N N U ZI I I 1 11 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 5 Ohs O OBI O O O O O h N h.0 OOi •• t 0 O 10N Q Nr1 N N N N N N 1"I OO VN P V 1 1 1 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 Ul.. 0Q O C O c. O O O O O O 00 00 O N U a N Y r C G m ed O 0 O V p 0 0 G W d d tl tl tl O C Hp � a yd G O m G G W S p 0 3 m� u 0 > •Eqc m0 R 'C C idl +0110 ; m0 G. N O. tl F G U v d +G1 .tlA mC ' wI G U1� 'Y M G a tl w a p G O O u m G X 0 m N m 0 F 0 �1= > a c 0 v ° u ° u v m o W - M �il n O U C r WK 3 d b G T S tl G u A d tl q U O A d tl U C Y a tt � w F tl ti 0 p O N u w w T 7 m .�i la y sa C O N C di . L u m A �i tl N U W M N O q • N O m100 Om 11 O m O O O v0 O O 0 r 10 r1 o m1`tN ago C mr o e o 0 0 10 0 0 a ow m o • • •� A O O O 4A eiN N O N N Q O YfTV N N 0110 w N Y1 111 O N N I(1 r N r N r N� NO-'ll rl O � � � Q .-1 r-1 £0 Q � w N tl P r M r-1 � 7 n W 1 N x tl o \ tl a ry N tl N O O N O N r Qi 01 01 V 01 ;.� q q q m q W. N ti n o aC m 0 0m � a w E{t� z m v � ( � 2: s CF (C4 y q N N ON m M l > w } 4W) W 41 w a `. U d E U pB V 01 C q u tai w T O Y w . N u 0, m v A A A O.O�.1 w.y A C w w W A us u a S I W u O F W a P. Om1 CP O r.. W W F m 0.Mi Ip-1 N O N <NO rl w� N a' N N N Om co m 111 m N N N 1�1 ICI N O N N D\ N N N N 1O N MN N N N 1 1 1 11 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I 1 1 O N N r 0 0 O s 00 01 N 01 A 01 010 01 N O 01 N O N N N .-1 N b w e 111 N r-1 .i r-1 N .'1 N N rl N ti rl V I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I V 0 O O N 0 000 o a Q O d' 0o 0 O a O O W M n O U C r WK 3 d b G T S tl G u A d tl q U O A d tl U C Y a tt � w F tl ti 0 p O N u w w T 7 m .�i la y sa C O N C di . L u m A uu tl N U W M N O q zz m u OI N m hhry/1 N P d N r1 rl � �M10Mm� m h ~OriQpNhNri� i M IIIYYYppppO''MM�1+1+1+I III��� K 33d m 0 G d3 n DC 7 N 10 � m Y h ± Sa i m nJ Igo ID d n T ON \+1 ON pGm N J� ; q r-1 {M�Lw 'CdO (aL \� Nhr•IC ahh9 O +CI bl 3 ro ro \ \b; TOOV1�a°ee' °•m° o C.C,30 m •'iN10 QdTNh .. £ N O M • W W 1tltl U 31 +1 M N T I M O G Id 1.7 1(1 b ca CL (L+Im 7 A d d n h u d OmN I na CND of m a+n d d rn a ++ a ,.�ia�wR to In roc.+al i u d ./d\ a r n C -1.1 I I •'d` MMUm�roa+oc ±• �Fi � � .H UVW p � � •••1 m a i t w rU7 N a� .N•-i 1 .•G U I a 'V � d >d v rU i $ [ Ua F ° [ a G m Gd>", rao Sd m .dm ci \.`i�< � M m d M d U o MM4d •/ 0004 sl U > G m M m m C4 N O d N n m .M d Hd Mmuma 0 O 7 C N n m N O r Q z CI m[L u£ W W m H M ow a hh•-M0 MMMT HI N N N I 1 I O N N H U Q a 0 Q O O O O O m z � H N Z b N •-1 4 m d p i 0 M E z° a° O 10 T N T ••1 OI h O N M'1 N N N N T M T N N N h N 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 O O O T T O T b N U[[ t a[[ s T h b N N •-1 •••1 N rl O[ s c s N YI N N I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 11 N .-1 H •-1 •••1 N .-1 M .-1 N .-1 .� O O O O O O O O O O o 0 W y G H .•1 O 10.C;y g b O N d ti 7 :i U W .i U N h W G •� £ O e H w JI a C n £ ^•� pp N GG K C N iK a y N F N 11 I O bg••GI O U ry R P r-1 b N N������yyyyyy 1/1 N O R Y1 Yf Yf N n 0 r b ul m v N O Q a w m F N IOU a a O a m w0 W -E- R t a U M M w O N M 3 apt W 0 T w v � 0 Jl M 0 N VI MavY c N N m r', N N N O N N N b N NNNU1N Nln O N NN I I I 1 1 W I I O I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 7 O N > C A R rINNROOO O O ON O P � N NN N H N H •- 1•- 1NNNNN 10 N NN N 1 I 1 I I C U R O a r� F W t O a C a R R R R R n r n n n ry N N N N O b•"IR NONR�n n O OOIO O f•1ONPb1.1M R O 000 O PIl1NNPR0 O N wYfO I(f n N N N E m N N N it1 N c 4 c ri w u 1 I • O O {: M •1 a ea a a N O w U ° I•ma u ° O aM G m w O a 0 0 U C O O 0 • 0 G g m R 0 10 R 0 O WM.Q I U FSSI>•ZEO T •-1 [� e u a am o C, .0 > y 0 0 O O N M COI 2r a m m:• m w r0¢ m 0 0 G M H O 11 11 R 19 0 w w v � 0 M M 0 N VI MavY c N N m r', N N N NN N N N b N NNNU1N Nln O N NN I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 7 � R rINNROOO O O ON O P � N NN N H N H •- 1•- 1NNNNN 10 N NN 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P O O O w a In +1 IO a 0 T 'O al p � -.1 y q U a U •y M e a a e 77 D 6 ? U d O C O 1 y 7 m a O m N OM T W 0 t! N U O W a O -A di 0 M Xy "' M a ••I al .r U L7 O O a 8 U M m_ N d +OI ON a 2 0 101� 0 X 41 w y 1 1 1 Y a 0 O b 1� O A O b h QS m O N N O 01 N m O• O b b b b r r r 0 T OI O• 01 O O O O O O O O 5 N N N N N N O O O O O O O U a N O V O O O O O O O N O O m �I01 N N O O O O O O O N O O N b 1!1 h O O O rl O O •1 rl O O N m N O O O b O O N !D O O .-1 e N N N N N O •-1 1fl N � 1.1 N N T N r-1 •-1 � N N W H m •" °i \ P• W x W x F' .ci °i w w w w w C Z 0 W W O O 0 0 0 M O C d U V U u u F • O O H H H H N V O Q Q 0. 0. 15 u E: w w w w 0 0 u F .a •+ + u m U > b > b b b Sol. B N N A G O W � a 4 �. a W a N F 9 S N '1 rl N N N N N N N N N N [$• I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 i ❑ N O• O O O O O O OI O O N O V I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I R O o O O O o o O O O o 0 0 m G '• N W d y a •+ ' y o 3 ( w > v e C V U {y },• I y H ECG 1!y t E0E (fi 0• a0+ .mi b 1R tl K F 0 10 0 H 0 3 w p G 0 ?C x EmE CHl 01 N .'.t li O U M Y H y N H H 7 6 12y H m C m m O 0 Q O 4 W U 0 t,*, 5 W r! A O S • I M B M 0 R A N D U M To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Date: February 28, 1979 Subject- Cooperation Agreement - City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County Housing Authority The Office of Community Development, through Phil Rush, Housing Development Specialist, requested that a public hearing date be set by the City Council to discuss the above referenced subject. Request that on March 7, Council set by Resolution (HUD Requirement) a public hearing for March 21 at which time Mr Rush will be present to maP.e a presentation to Council Information to Council will preceed 21st ineeting BH /mw 7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY i' county of Son 9ernordlno OFFICE OF COMa1wNITV DEVELOPMENT IOLDI N ANN c wcu>tA 1111 Earl MIN StrEet • Son 9nnudino, CA 92416 17141383.2746 �j► February 12, 1979 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Box 793 - 9340 Basline Av - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Wasserman: The Office of Comvnity Development would like to schedule two agenda dates before your City Council to discuss a proposed Cooperation Agrecment between the City and the County Housing Authority. In a recent housing advertisement, issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, 319 net public housing units were allocated to the Riverside - San Bernardino Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SIISA). The Housing Authority of San Bernardino County is currently preparing to application for approximately 155 of these units to be located on scattered sites throughout the County. To date, specific sites have not bean selected As part of the formal application, Cooperation Agreements must be negotiated between the Housing Authority and all local governmental jurisdictions where proposed sites are located. In this light, agreements will be requestcd from, all Comm.nity Development cooperating cities, as well as the County Boaro Uf Supervisors Enclosed ate backup materials for the proposed Cooperation Agreeaant including, a sample agreement, resolution for public hearing, etc. Since there are time constraints Involved in the submittal of a f anal application to HUD, the Office or Coanunity Development requests your assistance in scheduling time on the City Council agenda to authorize and conduct a public hearing in regard to the proposed agreement. It should be noted that at least mo agenda dates will be required One date to authorize notice of a public hearing, and the second date, at least two weeks later, to hold the actual hearing. Page 1 TAnl c000.wN Gnn +• Ip nr,_m- , I.,.. On... JAMLSL MA11ICLD In.9un. Of ,v •S ...I YS[CIIIiCN it .lOtll <I noaE9T 0.TILN[y, 4ai•. In.Ir CALM,61.10.14 —W.to rot. \iLND iu nh Davy E'111-w• Ir tl Goa 1W yota t.hn 0m•n, v LETTER TO: MR. LAUREN HASSERIWI February 12, 1979 Page 2 of 2 I will be contacting you in regard to this matter before February 16, 1979 Any questions can be answered at that time, or 1 can be reached at 383 -3764. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT R. ANN SIRACUSA, Director O.J a 0---- PHIL L. RUSH, Housing Development Specialist _ PLR:se Enclosures zc: Bill Holley I l ,� =P W w jt"�M1YII �h: ta`� #� M E M O R A N D U M r Date. March 2, 1979 To. Lauren Wasserman From; Dill Holley Subject: Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility Lauren, request Council authorization to solicit bide and award pruchase order for 200 stack chairs, 20 folding tables, 1 chair dolly and 1 table dolly for the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility which is due to open in May. Item was included and approved in this year's budget. Request agenda date of March 7 for Council consideration. BH w �YV �. 1-18T iEt • e. /FLD. C* E` p 1 T V e SSOCI.TfO r Ea r ciirr1iiiSa1 t 1 1.( CC041, rf SOr El O. tie1M0 Wuuo•ttulobM 1AI11 F. ^G d SIN.IYISI:R O t;[f i••y ? .CB R i•: I RCi 13 CLE•;L'E LRI. OSSVIIr. r V-1 K1 C a `:n itg 46 wtud o, M CWT V far 11"n1•0 .•t,( at Ca aCK1L Located on the west side of Sapphire Street at Highland SCALE , V. 90* Avenue and Alta Loma Drive -• OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc r —' 1260 hest Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 u 21 �Q• I Performance Bond (Sewer) $76,000 I i\ Performance Bond ( Water) $54,000 i L,2; ( Performance Bond (Road) $154,000 NOTE: The sanitary ewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on February 9, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plane and it is recammended that the roads be accepted. The Improve- ments include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walla and street signs. yt d Cn ' era eowia fWkff r'• i • J� b _ _ *f � 5 19 3I! 19 20 �! 21 (! 22 fi4 5 �`AEtt II ?! 10 Z�! �9 °t 8I! 7 `li 6 LLJ Lu _ US HIGHLAND s 58 c 59 r (r.f 1i g�66 yr 67 C� Z A w /.w.. a.ilg 64 69T It 60 7 :G �•d � t ..r � rn 62• `6 63 d 1 f TRACT `4 0 O '3!2t '^"t1 a1100.1I0 I.GI•rll•i E cc, 4 1 . C S l r, t I , t l[ Oriitl10, MIMI1. ., � r.Iw t >,rcn:vv, f! fmq[•O U IC13 '1 r^ .- C1O.'1 Q 4I[PNb Q 9N+![n.I:CIKV 5'lt[fD U F: 1 Iv! -' R[R:5 i1 I 43 4tV 42 YJ .5 U 44 v ze + 1 �? . •'�,J,ur•y 36 J jrl 45 *', i% 1�;, tf" +F- f "', " ��• .,. , ♦ �.>..tq .; : K �3 A 9 40yi� l . ,I ; l (>• yn= � 29 30 46 39 3.t 31 4 V Z ♦ �y —T TiGt'j'� ^a .� ... 48 K4e O- t Y y •} -ai 0.j \Y \ •�1 ,. t 7 IB d1t 19 Ir. 49 t ,•'_' "♦ ; fa 13 ka•12 1% II l.i 10 r. Hi6HLAt ..nMWOR/W) 54 58 f 59 y /� ;ti; ci i� 51 'eft 57I Y 6G {1 Ward .." ne^:vii_.•_ --°i, - -'� - :. � / ♦ � t I ~ 17 S2� 56 61 .. -.. 53 r 55 ., C. ho ■ RAG -1- 1\10. $% 1!'S :r .:t ldd }r•IOYL [EA• •10*l('t •a • - -, :!✓a� 'V40 .1(51NCA E ^'•.:P. •AJ" 0- n -.4i1J ,IC VLrU (:•GVOCAL ^-YrE W Irr .0-NT? 1 CE E(P C:9 4 S1 E 9 or PUS. 4N t PEP al' P((•(a OED W E(C9 • Pa6E9 10 V4P5, Pr TwE Orn:! OP t.iC rDYI,T♦ FCt ^.aDC9 p ra1D <OUMtt Tvtvas a ItCOT:.IDt PC E 9990 /J OUNDARY" 1,A l }j Located on the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Archibald Avenue OWNER: John D Lusk d Son 17550 Gilletea Avenue P 0. Enx C -19560 A Irvine, California 92713 .t Performance Bond (Sewer) $16,000 i t Performance Bond (Water) $20,000 Performance Bond (Road) $80,000 I NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by I -. the Cucamonga County Water District on February 9, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the Road Improvement plane and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- e.• ments incln0s curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. 1 • ^ ;r: � � _..�.: :. �'! ass:( j • / � I �' III �/P N b M1 Ii � lr ; � ' _.._.lam" E g; �•�-•f�•' �• • �" `o , �y /IIN11 1 11 -• ..ra..r .... - 5�.'/�: ✓M:K•�, ��.�t: Div NCYJ �: `v: !d a "1 :10 1 � 3,l 41 r _eli _ , i i 141 I` -0 /I °• 10'r 5tt m erti Ji Ii Nato :1 r .�•. -< —aII� —tea 3 X C T TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, IN UMNCORPORATED CALIFORNIA f. nNK w Ou/Nm]IOw' o.1 M well ue .1 01 10" ! wnq e, n,", s. co, 4 -0. 4 M ✓fOluC 4155 0A 1 40 01. ,4.n !' 4� 1l 100n & W/ a I'll .1 01 N "5 /N M! 01111 or R1 1 1014 0 rC C"O " o1 Y 9fAMN0 /.v0, jr"r O C-' ./w NlL SOM lM7NflR /NG LK: M.IRCM. 1570 Located on the northeast corner of hillside Road and 14 1n„ fy Beryl Street by "w OWNER: R L Sievers 6 Sons Inc. k Q ,i 1 w 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B >r.w vq it Buena Park, California 90620 Performance Bond (Water) $58,000 i c Performance Bond (Road) $90,000 ' ! fa NOTE: The sanitary eater system was approved by the I y Cucamonga County Water District on February 9, 1979 �n �- The ropd construction has been approved as being in , it accordance with the Road Improvement plane and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- cents include curb and gutter, paving, walls and scree[ signs. n vi w° �• r✓ 't� 1 � 3,l 41 r _eli _ , i i 141 I` -0 /I °• 10'r 5tt m erti Ji Ii Nato :1 r .�•. -< —aII� —tea 3 1 I. IN UNINCORPORATED TERRITO CAOF OF THE COUNTY 0:1 SAN BERNARDINO, /ypy A Jr yyny iv Ol /1+! wlJf D� w'tf d /O /J ! /nrAG MK„ D. CKA✓e+Jr M'V!/!AO I!]1X✓ /UV• f /YI M�eMIFa �C[Y.wr+ Ol OiCr !6 C! I IO) ✓ fd 0/ /G' Y f^'r F6A JAV glrv. o, Jbu ar uu/reAU MA.tiN, /WG � Nl'L SON !. L /NPIR /NG. //•� w•! / / ;��.�.A�//![r AyL +Y /dt AIR A.v+•1+w VY / //AAAYNJ /r A2'tAf11 u.4. we O //1 ✓ /f' y/r /�fyp�.u.vN A/Y HIFi /lqH An.P'N y dN, �- /4q..gaA.bymtr+�e'.•u /./i .erry/r� � We. 7 1 - ,lrr• / /z�Al `' }/. 1 ee.efd ie roedi reif err as ✓• .Ills �_ A..'..e ArwT✓ it w' e I ki were /a•ve•�� �: . AYI TIr,Y 1 I '1 2 Z W 2 I 1 ��8 rr°v 7.yYr _ Yw w�• N I , ay -fi(t} tu =e•n4r wnr ^ ^rn 1 4�q 4� i 1 { 2 � d/s - � � •\ iS ee is }� r; ; ,I 0 If �L �7 I �wrr Ylrf 5P s..a ph nv IJ 1 ` V heated on the northwest corner of Beryl Street and Banyan Street OWNER: Proud Construction Coreoration •� 14491 Raintree Road I Tustin, California 92680 Performance Bond (Sewer) $13,000 Performance Bond (Water) $16,000 7 NOTE: The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on January 31, 1979. Tiro sever bond Is requested for release since the circumstances changed the developer's plane end ,• individual septic systems were installed, te r w 1p I N W�LhON NV Mula r w -7. 6, 10, II. 12 . 13 . 14. 1 I CJ , W z -ear rR.eT of N0.9IND c 4 U J O > i ' .4 K P O e- rr, y W U a� at; Wz _ Wo 0 ;Iz '- Z a:l Z r 1�% � p�A.NYAN 5TREET r— r I'• L0C/-\Tj0W MA,P 4 No hGnue -7. 6, 10, II. 12 . 13 . 14. 1 I CJ , 1 r being Sn accordanee with the Road Improvement plans and it is recoamended that the roads be accepted. TI The improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, ( paving, walls and street signs. tai if i H II 4'I b is 2 [i �••' °• t "��' •• N ltt� E7 C1EL 170t Ij�ia It u : JI,N%I_': , `N � i•Y A L w t'. Y•I \ `STRFFY � � � ' rurn q � u i' r N' E'(•t i (�F i IYI J.Ie• [ ' •w•rrnv \VI mY pt. :i� •, O \i �� yi g [ �mvl, r IAA' •v N' V /u N 4 STREET." "to- it 7-1 i n t- I J S i i�� (µII arrlt,� 1 IM M nt Y•!e! r\ F I.1• IlerrM., 1. 1•�II11 el r r • rre •sM Y±; `I,'1I � 1f a YP. I•e • eI I•• ur rp u 1 I'•I•'rJN�' • Ilbi .... .1.•'el .et lIY.1 t •rr eN l III. � t •rr•'1 nl -r � ...r . rr •w.r.r •1 •r r•le'rn.r txl••Ilmin'r••i`II •�M In'll•Y' al Yr �rN 1 ^�l,n lrn .M`•• ..M I IIMJ•le s: t (� • • t•M`II . • Iv. x Ilrr••Ir .t tl•• 1 M ItIM 1• Y• Ills 1 \Y a..nit I•rlrlar mo r w J J +n+ TRACT NO. 9450 \ Rana Avenue and Rermosa Avenue at Loced _ betveen mo at •Ill La Vine Street J4 Y• ?J rA6, t OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc .i 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Sever) $73,000 $46,000 "!•��� iii�r rl.nn Performance Bond (Water) Performance Bond (Road) Perform $114000 , '••'/'[" t ROTE: nWater aDi by the Cuciamongaa County January 220 trict an January 1979 The road construction has been approved as r being Sn accordanee with the Road Improvement plans and it is recoamended that the roads be accepted. TI The improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, ( paving, walls and street signs. tai if i H II 4'I b is 2 [i �••' °• t "��' •• N ltt� E7 C1EL 170t Ij�ia It u : JI,N%I_': , `N � i•Y A L w t'. Y•I \ `STRFFY � � � ' rurn q � u i' r N' E'(•t i (�F i IYI J.Ie• [ ' •w•rrnv \VI mY pt. :i� •, O \i �� yi g [ �mvl, r IAA' •v N' V /u N 4 STREET." "to- it 7-1 i n t- I J S i i�� (µII arrlt,� 1 IM M nt Y•!e! r\ F I.1• IlerrM., 1. 1•�II11 el r r • rre •sM Y±; `I,'1I � 1f a YP. I•e • eI I•• ur rp u 1 I'•I•'rJN�' • Ilbi .... .1.•'el .et lIY.1 t •rr eN l III. � t •rr•'1 nl -r � ...r . rr •w.r.r •1 •r r•le'rn.r txl••Ilmin'r••i`II •�M In'll•Y' al Yr �rN 1 ^�l,n lrn .M`•• ..M I IIMJ•le s: t (� • • t•M`II . • Iv. x Ilrr••Ir .t tl•• 1 M ItIM 1• Y• Ills 1 \Y a..nit I•rlrlar cT !I A lie J.j eIl/ J Nl,.S I IM r, tltiu I m1'ree Tjemll J,410) •V f.L J.`•x �]• Alle \ },� •Ill U J4 Y• ?J rA6, t .i cT !I A lie J.j eIl/ J Nl,.S I IM r, tltiu I m1'ree Tjemll J,410) ACT NO. 9450 W /V/MCOnPoMIRe RI•IrQ1Y rl rh( COW /Y O/ JAM IQMgI /MO• C",M.M4 f YwG / JIebHLGM b A M)OnM b I19CA I, COCANOMLA AIa rj rAo AJSOC /ArtN i )C•J MCW lY0AMM1 tlOfM1M b Cdt�v[Mr l0�! XC�Rw Sfy Ix,9 • I1 [(MO! V br•CML IlAr b JA 10 L ANO ANAOvED IY 7W L fw N(AAL,0 ) fIx,A 1, Im f0 Lr ARO ALi14l /l, II)/ ANWfAS/V EWAtrl*l M JCALC 410- AUL9fr /NS { 0• /V V6..•AY f0J _xDTCrtxrN Jrprrr_ Jn SAylt✓ar Nrrrr wI Ir /II,M,r` TRACT AT, $109 n it 331 i i v Ii y i %i7{:• • i f a r i n i t /o I u um0ry I rk•b yu yn nu y y n is f J's" Y ° Ivnnh t 11 j !!j AS d •f AI u Z, f) i � .Pn. ,• dry �• \�'•rn •• •� �� "•� .r.OYYq..� �� .,nr. i •n ci r,roxr wm �j t�- hI�.A/ �� -"ii •Inrnr rnm- i7\i u td •IS 8 j y ° If ,.I t t I• Il at r.u'nn/ rum ? L y �i...u..r nrnF Iaw r My �n.. 'ii rlt �\,:• »m rm \ .I trrJ,r w I/ 8riu.� ; #I iy4 r�iir ;4 fl �(yi`r ` °J,�•�i +; •/ ed .I Q k I• :.... _nw.. -..1_ _ rr�ff� i r H v \' Rl..e., f 49- •- 4...1�_rtl' • �� ' rlvns_ _...�_ i - .1. D IIM E m' LA NhT STREET A mm' !rY• F SM Wm YuGy wIlm• CYNYI• NY' 1)um• /r/ra• A I,m .tall• llff ,RI �8 i L�A / t S4 a a4 • a4 r ti- t ;,, r i. t i4 r fe ro N Sle ° -v .- 11 .• a e 1118 �• .• W •I Y YW WW YN I Ym — �� + Y.IM ryh Y• w/ C4Yw•.ynIN..11IW FN III, MII'(MWIy .II'1I1.'f IM,W II /I m' — —�{� _ate_. . r..1•.r�zlnsa =ar..a — _ D IIM E r� bm mm' !rY• F SM HAP /f! wIlm• CYNYI• NY' 1)um• /r/ra• A I,m .tall• llff ,RI D Iili Located on the southeast corner of Baseline and %A >MM r +Ss Ramon Avenue a- . /.• a 01D1ER: Thompson Associates Development Company „;•a, P. 0. Box 338 — 1 ..�.. L Carlsbad, California 92008 Performance Band (Road) $152,000 +�i NOTEs The road construction has b pe ment lane and been app a being io Y.; I in accordance with the Road Improv 9 I it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The t , improvements include curb and gutter, paving, walls i9- i a and street sign _ •, b S "s w t1 .• ^V i j °I .: MY - -•YYY/ 1\'Yb ,aY}1''YUba � •�+•� "O.Yi •VNOi SI" � • 1 •RRkek +i ter i`8 to p "p>) . ^10 % to ^ p;t i}} nL t � � �1t] �I 8 #ta• • ♦ b2 `i Yy R VL •I �it Y. E[�tl ' .aTu :a, s... t W k i9U v;p, n ti'•'�i t ° QS l55J F'^ ~ T+a: { `°' .�r/� E • E ^z.°a+': Es {j, :1 It>, •� e�" ! /IN .a.Tw a' '.....J �l ..•� la /. 9' O t'� I t' } w A Wi^ m ul l �.N• "� ,/4, ...: Y�aY^a •aa-, .,Yyi .! -i = t'e• ..•.•YYi. T. •;� ! W � it'll 01' .In In In 'A" - v I 'fi�t. w it ((�� Z jby i o Q 2 r'i r" ..s.,- g yl lY 5G d dad oil =a a .. s �`G S iv yek• Z, Ct�F e `1 ;2 L i[ •i �t�'tS •i a Wb . Lt• ai i U Qjrj� �,�,e" t T.. .u.. /.. dt �:' ..vn� L 8 ,I l Z_a� S } i t ge.'tt,___ an''tst• 9eu .YYta -,L 61I 2 y = kj i {jj Nf31 All Y= Q I � ,'k t) aij � 5 1 w • bit � ➢ ;• G i ;+•{t�lj `' it, ".�/ ; Iz1�• tlN�--- ��� ^s+ 1 I� 14E �• I} i i i Q IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Located on the northeast corner of Haven and 19th Street. oHNER: Thompson Associates Development Corporation ..eau p 0 Box 338 Carlsbad, California 92008 Landscaping and Block Hall $74,894.88 v NOTE: On Hay 9, 1978, the San Bernaraino County Board of '} Supervisors authorized the release of all bonds for }' the subject tracts to Thompson Assoc Sates Development Company. This action was taken due to the sale of the tracts to Lewis Homes of California and the receipt of replacement bonds � w✓w � 1� .n� �� F rx� r.: iiwt�.• r� t ,:•a.: vw ekk A y .n t11 Miw~ E NY�IP �Ii It tY J_L rrrY•r ++r,n IY.y 1/fd Mtl DerAll3 The tracts in th sPlanet- ,Filed, 1LewisaHomes acquiredtaese been holding a replacement bond for these improvements on June 15, 1978 He have received a request to release the duplicate bond in the name of Thompson Associates A search of our records indicate that this is the first request to us did d did notshow theoLewise In- formation bond existed He new have dccumoats verifying the Levin bond for land- scaping is active He recommend that since the Levis ,I II bond is active that the Thompson bond should be released. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM0130A MEMORANDUM Date: March 7, 1979 Tot City llanager tad City Council From: Jack I=, Director of Community Development Subject: CONSENT CALENDAR Please set the following items on the consent calendar: 1 ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT N0. 79 -01 - SIGN ORDINANCE - For public hearing before the City Council on March 21, 1979. 21 �; I ORDINANCE NO. G a AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 207- 031 -19 FROM FP -2 TO A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE. OF BASELINE APPROXIMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLO"dS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: a. That the Planning C Issfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing hold in the time and marmot prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the _ time and manner prescribed by law and has duly heard and considered said recommendation. b. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed. I That this rezoning will have no significant environ- mencal impact and a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Commission on January 10, 1979, SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner state, and the zoning map In hereby amended accordingly. FP -2 (Flood Plain) to AP (administrative professional) Said property Is located on the sruth side of Baseline, approximately 800' cost of Carnelian know as Aasessor Parcel 207 - 031 -19 This Ordinance shall be In full force, and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 4ay of February, 1979. Mayor ATTEST: '2Z City Clerk �" f ORDINANCE NO. 53 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE KEEPING, OF DOGS AS PETS WITHIN THE CITY. SECTION 1. For the purposes of this article, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this article are defined as follows: a. "Commercial kennel* shall mean any place, other than a private kennel, where four (4) or more dogs over four (4) months of age are kept. b. "Enforcing Officer" shall mean the City Manager, the Police Chief, the Humane Office, the City Health Officer, or such other person as the Council may designate. SECTION 2. Vaccination and licenses: Required. Each dog over the age of four (4) months harbored within the City shall be vaccinated for rabies and licensed. The owner or harborer of such dog shall be required to present to the Enforcing Officer, upon request, a valid license and vaccination certificate s.gved by a licensed veterinarian. Such vaccination shall be made each year unless a chick - embryo vaccine approved by the Department of Public Health of the State has been given by a licensed veterinarian within two (2) years. SECTION 3. Licenses: Places of procurement. Licenses shall be available at the License Bureau in the City Hall and at the Dog Pound. SECTION 4. Licenses: Fees: Penalties. a. Dcg license fee are hereby set by resolution. SECTION 5. Licenses: Applications: Issuance: Form. Upon the receipt of th, required license fee accompanied by an application in writing giving the name and address of the owner or possessor of the dog and a brief description of the dog, the Enforcing Officer shall issue and deliver to such person a license certifying the payment of such fee and setting forth the name and address of the application, a brief description of the dog, and the number allotted to such dog. 23 SECTION 6. Tags: Issuance. At the time of the issuance of a dog license, the Enforc- ing Officer shall deliver to the applicant for such license a metal tag which shall set forth the date of expiration of the license. SECTION 7 Tags: Maintenance on dogs. it shall be the duty of the owner or harborer of the dog for which a tag is issued, to maintain such tag on such dog. SECTION 8. Leashes. No person owning or harboring any dog within the City shall permit such dog, whether licensed or not, to be upon any public street, sidewalk, lane, alley, court, or any other public place or upon any private property or premises, other than those of the person owning or having control or custody of such dog, except when such dog is held under by an able- bodied and competent person. the City. SECTION 9. Vicious dogs. No person shall harbor or keep any vicious dog within SECTION 10. Rabies examinations. a. Biting dogs: Quarantine. Wherever it is shown that any dog has bitten any petson, the owner or person having the custody or possesion of such dog shall, upon the order of the City Health Officer or his authorized agent, quarantine the dog and keep it securely chained for a period of ten (10) days, and shall permit the City Health officer or his representative to make an inspection or examination ch dog at any time during such period. Quarantined cogs r.ot be removed from the premises without the permission of the City Health Officer. The City Health Officer, in the interest of protecting the person bitten, may order the dog quarantined for a period of twelve (12) days at the owner's expense at the City Pound or at a licensed veterinary hospital. b. Dogs having or suspected of having rabies. The En- forcing Officer or any of his deputies shall have the right to seize any dog within the City having or suspected of having rabies and cause the same to be examined by the City Health Officer, and it shall be the duty of the City Health Officer to examine the dog for the purpose of determining if such dog is afflicted with rabies. c. Release of rabies -free dogs. If it shall be determined that such dog does not have rabies, it shall be returned to the owner or person harboring the dog. 2.4 2 SECTION 11 Impoundment a. Unlicensed dogs and dogs at large. It shall be the duty of the Enforcing officer to impound any dog for which a license is required if such dog shall not be wearing the dg license tag provided for in this article or any dog running loose upon a public street, side walk, lane alley, court, or other public place or private ore custody those of he and the Enforcing Officer shall keep the dog impounded until claimed, de- stroyed, or otherwise disposed of. b. Release to owners: Fees. The owner or possessor of the dog so impounded may reclaim such dog upon the payment of the required license fee and Ten and no /100ths ($10.00) dollars pickup fee for the first offense. Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) Dollars pickup fee for the second offense within six (6) months of the prior offense, Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) dollars pickup fee for the third offense within six (6) months of the second offense plus boarding fees in the amount of Two and no /100ths ($2.00) dollars for the first day and for each additional day the dog is impounded. C. Adoption: Disposal. If a dog shall have been impounded for a period of three (3) days and shall not have been reclaimed by the owner, the Enforcing officer may, in lieu of killing such may, owe with the approval ofoa licensed veterinarians cr Humane rOfficer Ofver, the State, humanely destroy any impounded animal on the sama day it is impounded if the animal is in great pain or discomfort due to an injury or infectious disease which may contaminate and be detrimental to the health of the other animals at the animal shelter. d Destruction. If an impounded dog is not claimed at the expiration of such three (3) day period, it shall be the duty of the Enforcing of. incsuchseveat), suchtd g emayroeohelds not for an additional time not to exceed ten (10) days. SECTION 12. Commercial kennels: Licenses: Required: fees. Every person engaging in the business of operating a commercial kennel as defined in subsection (a) of section 1 of this article, shall obtain a license from the License Official and shall pay an annual license fee for each calendar year, or part of such calendar year. 75 �l SECTION 13. Commercial kennels: Licenses: Revocation. The License Official shall have the power, upon giving ten (10) days' notice by United hate Mail to any commercial kennel Licensee, to revoke any license granted to such commercial kennel operator for violations of the provisions of this article. ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS day of , 1979. Ayes: Noes: City Clerk of Ranc o Cucamonga 4 Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga - -2b ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: There in hereby Imposed by this ordinance a fee to provide a predictable and equitable funding source for capita) improvements by requiring those developing property to "buy into' the pre - existing City infrastructure so that the impact of new growth on existing Improvements will be borne equitably by new development. SECTION 2: Fee Schedule. The Systems Development Fee schedule and corresponding method of fee payment shall be In conformance with and equal to an amount ra set by Resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3: Payment of Fee Any applicant for building permit for a new development shall pay the Systems Development Fee in conjunction with payment of the building permit fee. SECTION 4: Exemptions. Any parcel of land which, on the date of application for a building permit, meets the following criteria shall be exempt from paying a Systems Development Fen: a. Alterations which do not increase the floor area of a structure; b. Additions to single family residential dwellings vhlch do not conatit•:te the addition of a living unit as defined by the building code; SECTION 5: Segregation and Use of Revenues: All funds derived frra the Systems Development Fee are to be segregated by accounting practices from all other funds of the City and shall be used for no other purposes than the construction and expansion of City streets and highway capital improvements to provide additional capacity and /or safety capabilities required because of new development Up to twenty -five (25%) of these funds may be expended for the purposed of planning and engineering design and administrative services of such capital improvements Initial funds collected under this Ordinance may be utilized to conduct Systems Planning studies designated by the City Council by Resolution. Designation of expenditure of funds available fr.,, the Systems Develop - mant Fee shall be made by the City Council Funds may be a cumulated for expect- ed future expansion costa SECTION 6: Saverability. If any section, sub - section. Bub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in the Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or =to sections, sub- sections, sub - divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be de- clared invalid or unconstitutional. C ' SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the ease, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Resort, a newspaper of general circulation, published in & City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ATTEST: APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1979, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk -- Mayor of the CS of Rancho Cucamooga 2I' RESOLUTION NO. 7cj —! .) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SETTING A SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE /„I OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby does resolve as follows: WHEREAS, Ordinance No. _� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides fer the collection of a Systems Development Fee to provide a predictable and equitable funding source for capital improvements by requiring new development to 'buy into" the pre — existing City infrastructure so that the impact of new growth on existing Smprcvementa will be borne by new development; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No, &I equires that every applicant for a building permit shall pay a Systems Development Fee equal to an amount set by Resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga sets a Systems Development Fee equal to one percent (1S) of the estimated building permit valuation of a building and that payment of the Systems Development fee shall be made concurrently with the payment of any and all building permit fees levied on construction of said building. ALSO. BE IT RESOLVED that funds collected under this fen may be utilized for the following studies: ATTEST: Preparation of subarea traffiways studies to establish specific street standards. Precise alignment plans for major and secondary thoroughfares. Specific Urban Design Plans for Spocial Boulevards. Establishment of City ieprovemant standards and specifications. Multimodal Tranuportation Element Studies. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of City Clark Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ORDINANCE NO. G 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 53 AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 53 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to re%d as follows: "SECTION 6: Exceptions: (a) Drainace fees shall not be required as a condition of the issuance of a building permit for alterations, repairs, or remodeling of any building where the cost of such alterations, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at less than $10,000.00. (b) The collection of drainage fees with respect to vacant parcels created by a parcel map or the waiver of a parcel map shall be deferred until such time as n building permit is issued for construction on said parcel or parcels " SECTION 2• Urgency. This ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure, necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, safety, health and welfare of persons and property within the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the reasons stated in Ordinance No. 53. This Ordinance shall take effect immadiately upon its adoption. SECTION 3: Severabilit If any section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have pissed each section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- cectionc, sub- divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and tha City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall Cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at leant once in The DaiAy Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, Calitornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California APPROVED and ADOPTED tais day of , 1979- AYES: rf NOES: r �( ATTEST: ABSENT: city clerk - 2 - Mayor of e City of Rancho Cucamonga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA MDlORMDUM.. DATE: Herd 7, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Amnzadment to Ordinance 53 - Storm Drain Pee Implementation of the Stem Drain Pea Ordinance has brought out a problem which staff feels presents an undue burden on property owners seeking minor subdivi- sions through the Parcel Hap procedure. The ordinance, as written, requires payment of the atom drain fee as a condition of recordation of a parcel may or waiver of parcel map. -,hiu can amount to large sums for large industrial _ parcels and for small developers of single homes on 5 acre parcels. For this reason, the Engineering Division and City Attorney hive prepared Ordinance 65 to amend Ordinance 53 and has revised Ordinance 60 to allow waiver of fees ca a parcel map or waiver of parcel amp on vacant parcels within a parcel map. RECOMMMATION: It Is recd ended that Ordinance 65 be adopted to amend Ordinance 53. Respectfully au/ tted, i abbe Cit nglnear LB:cc ORDINANCE NO. (C L2 A14 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FOPNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISH14ENT OF A ES I DRAINAGE PLAN AND ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE F The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. The City of Rancho Cucmonga is seriously a£- iontand developmentno£spr pertyewithin the City ihas 1plaaedvas- serious demand on existing facilities develop drainage u facilities storm waters. In order to p for the removal of surface and ato-rm waofrthe cost of they den equitable manner for the app the City Council does determine velopment of such facilities, lished toaprovidel funds to beausede for the constru t ction of the Lacilities described in the drainage plan. SECTION 2: Drainage Plan and Loyal Area. The comprehensive storm drain plans numbers 1 and 2, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the area lying within the City limits of the City of Rancho Cuca- ial, whiche omprehensives stormi costs drainpla , were eprepareddbyathe found and declared atoibe the dry e hereby Flood Control District, ainage plan for the City ofRancho Cuc Cucamonga. The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all areas of the City, and declares that for the purposes of this ordinance, all areas of the City shall con- stitute one local drainage area. SECTION 3: Payment t of Fees. As a condition of approval of a final map, a parcel map, the waiver of a parcel map, or the issuance of a build- ing permit, the City shall require the payment of a fee as es here - aftez provided for the purposes of defraying the actual or esti- mated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the re- moval of surface and storm waters from the local drainage area. the The City Council finds that development of property local drainage area will require aconstruction fees the areffairlylaP- described in the drainage P property in portioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the p P y the loyal Os on the such facilities ated by the proposed division or development Of in the -1- local drainage area.. The City Council further finds that the fee as to any property does not exceed the pro rata share of the amount of the total actual or estimated cost of all facilities porsnant to the drainage plan which would be assessable on any parcel of property it such costs were apportioned on a per acre basis. SECYIOU <- Ad=mit of Fee. The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance is $25.00 per 1 /100th Of an acre or fraction thereof. SEMON 5: Deposit and Utilization of Fee. !Me fee ree_nired to be paid by thir Ordinance shall be deposited in a planned drainage facilities fund' and shall be ,pended solely for the construction or reimbursement for the construction of drainage facilities parsnant to the drain- age plan or to reimburse tbe�Ciity for the costs of engineering - and administrative services to establish. design and-construct the plan and facilities up to 251. Initial funds collected may be utilized for zpec fie plain Aug and engineering stndies an des- ignated by resolution of the City Council. 'SECFIO"3 6: Exceptions. (a) Drainage fees shall mot he required as a condition of the issuance of a building peacit for alterations, repairs, or remodeling of any building where She -cost of such - alteratfons, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at less than $10,00.00 (b) - The.collecti a.of drainage fees viii respect to vacant parcels created by a- parcel map-,or the waiver of a parcel map shall be deferred until such time as a building permit is issued for construction on said parcel or parcels. SeMGV 7: Single Drainage Yee payment. !CO parcel of laced shall be subject to payment of a drainage fee more than once. If any portion of a parcel has previously paid a drainage fee, credit shall be given for sucb prior payment and a proper acportiemoemt made as a credit toward any fee payment required by this Ordinance. SEMOU 0: Severability . if any section, sub- section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clan" ar phrase in this min' ^M, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconsti- tutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the re- aaining sections .or portions of this Ordinance or any part them- - of. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed -2- 31 each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub - sections, sub- divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or uncon- stitutional. SECTION 9: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City CleIFE a1S attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause Lhe same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _day of 1979. ATTEST: 0 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor of the city at- Rancho Cucamonga COMPRNY 28 February 1979 City Council City of Rancho Cucamongn P 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Honorable Council Members: The purpose of this letter is to request a waiver of the storm drainage fees, enacted by the City Council et Its meeting on Wednesday, February 21, 1979 If the City Council Is unable to grant such a request without a hearing thereon, then we hereby respectfully request that our petition for a waiver of these fees be placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting scheduled to take place March 7, 1979• A representative of our company will attend the meeting to present our position and to answer whatever questions the City Council might have Below we have set out a brief statement of the factual background In support of our request for a waiver of the fees followed by a delineation of the reasons therefor FACTUAL BACKGROUND. In December of 1978, we filed applications with the Office of Community Develop- ment for building permits In connection with the construction of a general purpose "Butler Building" on our property locate.] at 10220 Fourth Street, here In the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (The estimated cost of the building will be about $52,000 ) At that time we were tole It would take about two to three weeks to approve the application. We received no response from the Development Office until January 29, 1979, at which time we were informed that final approval of the pernit application could not be given because the City had not yet decided on what Its landscaping requirements would be On February 2, 1979, we were Informed that the permit applications could not be processed until a newly enacted $25 application fee was paid We Immediately paid said fee. , POLY PLRSTIC PRODUCTS CITY OF R NCNO UCA ONGA ADMINISTRATION 14AR 1 1S79 7tB1911G1HI171112131915 8 4 10220 FOURTH STREET, CUCRMONCR, CRLIFORNIR 91-130 • 114- 981.89 City Council 28 February 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga PACE 2 On February 6 or 7 of this year, a representative from our company met with Barry K. Hogan from the Community Development Office to discuss our permit applications Thereafter we received a letter from Mr Hogan dated February 13, setting forth the various conditions upon which the City would grant building permits A copy of the letter is attached hereto In neither the letter nor in our diccussions with Mr Hogan was It Indicated to us that In aJdItIon to the conditions for the Issuance of building permits set forth In the letter, there would be the further condition thaqt we would have to pay $2,500 per acre as a drainage fee There was no notification whatsoever that any such fee was even being considered. After we received Mr. Hogan's letter, we reviewed the provisions contained therein and carefully considered the expense which would be Incurred to comply with the conditions. Shortly thereafter, we determined that we were willing to comply with said conditions and accordingly we Informed our contractor to proceed to obtain the permits Unfortunately, the man assigned by our contractor to be In charge of this project became Ili and was admitted to the hospital for a few days After he was released, he lmnedlately attempted to obtain the permits from the Community Development Office. At that time he was informed that on the preceding evening the City Council had passed an emergency measure effective Immediately assessing drainage fees on all future development and that said fees were to be collected before building permits could be Issued He was further Informed that, because our property contained approximately 7.16 acres, the fees would be about $18,000 As you can see, the mere fortuity that our contractor attempted to obtain the permits on Thursday Instead of Wednesday, raised the ;rice of our building from $52,000 to $70,000 REASONS FOR WAIVER REQUEST We believe that our request for a waiver of the drainrge fees In this particular Instance Is strongly supported by the following, reasons: 1 Had we known that It would have made a difference of $18,000 whether we picked up our permits on Wednesday as opposed to Thursday, obviously, we would have made every effort to obtain the permits on Wednesday At no time, was the possibility of any such fee raised In our conversations The passage of such an ordinance which was made effective Immediately and of which no notice was given whatsoever is contrary to the basic notions of democratic government It deprived us of our right to notice of a material change In the law and to conform our actions accordingly It also makes It Impossible for companies like ours to plan for the future If the consequences of our actions may be changed drastically and without notice by city government 2. Although building permit standards may be revised after granting the permits but prior to construction, that Is not the same as the assessment of fees and taxes without notice on actions which have already been contemplated and for which permits have already been filed; especially, when we could have easily avoided the Inpositlon of such fees and taxes if we had been Informed of City Council 28 February 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga PAGE 3 the contemplated ordinance. The passage of the emergency drainage fees measure without a grace period for permit applications already on file, but not obtained, may be Illegal At the very least, the drainage fees measure as it had been applied to our project certainly does not comport with the notions of fairness expressed in the statute quoted below. Although it Is not directly applicable to building permit applications, California Government Code Section 66483, dealing with the Imposition of drainage fees prior to the granting of subdivision permits, contains a fair method for notification of assessments for drainage fees. It provides as follows: "There may be Imposed by local ordinance a requirement for the payment of fees for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from local or neighborhood drainage areas and of constructing Planned sanitary sewer areas, subject to the following conditions: (a) The ordinance has been In effect for a period of at least 0 days prior to the fl l Lng of the tentative map or parcel map if no tentative map Is required." (emphasis added) 3 Due to organ) ational problems in your Development Office (which are to be expected during the formative period of a new city government) and the unfortunate Illness of our contractor resulting In the delay in obtaining the permits, the price of our $52,000 build'ng ballooned to $70,000 without any notice or opportunity to be heard. This Increase in costs was due to completely fortuitous everts bearllg no relationship to the actual construction which was to take place. Again, at to time was It cmmunicated to us that we should proceed as rapidly as possible to obtain the permits because a drainage fee was contemplated In all probability, we will not be In a position to construct the building at this additional cost even though It would be beneficial to the efficient operation of our facility. 4. Finally, the fee, which as we understand it Is based on the entire acreage of our property, bears no relationship to the actual acreage upon which the construction will take place. It Is our understanding that the only way to obtain the building permits necessary for the construction of our building without payment of the drainage fees Is to obtain a prior waiver of said fees from the City Council. It is based on this understanding that we have written you this letter As you are aware, 35" City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 February 1979 PAGE 4 time Is extremely critical with respect to all construction projects and thus, It is very Important that our request as heard as soon as possible. We are looking forward to our appearance before the City Council .n discuss the matters contained herein. Thank you very much for your cooperation Very truly yours Poly Plastic Products, A Brooks Company Zti M. Brooks, Jr. President FMBjr:raf Encl 3� CITY 0? RANCHO COCAHONCA MPH RANDOM DATE: March 7, 1979 TO: City Manager and City Council FR08: Jack Lm, Director of Community Development SUDJECT: ZONE CHANCE. NO. 9745 en-1 98 -65 - VANCDARY - A change of zone from R -1 -9500 to R -3 for 9.3 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ramona and 19th. r The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors held required public hearings for rho above described zone changoe but withheld the euabling ordinance until development plane were cubmitted and approved. Several time extensions were granted by the County and the applicant was caught in the mritorium. Since Janueiy, 1979, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been accepting and processing apartment d:�elopments. Therefore, the Flaming Commission, at its meeting of February 14, 1979, approved site plans for the development of a 200 unit apartment couplaz contingent upon the finalization of the zone change. Staff ban prepared the enabling ordinance for the above described zone :bongos for City Council action. No public hearings are required since they were conducted by tht County Board of Supervisors. RECOMIMNDAV01, The Planning Division staff recommends that the City Council adopx cue nc[ached ordinance which enacts zone changes No 97 -65 and 98 -65. Rgspectfpllf submitted, .fnck Lam, Director of 'amunity Development JL:tN:cc .,.!El%rr zj ULM w � rla (t9t�ht. =r.' V✓`Ni !.° •' r e« �iSyr�l '�' •1 •.{�� Y� _,T. �,,.- .. 3'h ?; ' i Ar r r' l irfy . • � v +:: � K � I • I,'r'.i i )t N; FrS • ' • J'', ••' T4 ly H: i.i� 1�4 T i i +n1 • - to .-. a � a A �'I � +•t RN ow NN £ u.j --;-- ----- -- �__ nr1?�---rrr jf :f .• 3 a a I r. tf ' ♦ �{ I W �_ 01 3 •f ti Yr� .;� i as •rri y i � L'N � � e. ri ♦ n � t. i a ♦ vu �• .r S A, i _ I wsv , • \ +ter r / -� .p • h Ice 1 -5 onmmv •• e^ Ol7BIHoyv 1— •Ta ir+ /I �,y d:i • , rZs�i M E M 0 P A N D U M * Date: March 2, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman Prom: Bill Holley Subject: Heritage Park Lauren, request Council authorization to enter into an agreement between the City and the Alta Loma Riding Club. Subject of the proposed agreement would be permission for the Club to use a portion of Heritage Park for temporary installation of their riding ring. (Basically, this is the same type of agreement held currently between Citrus Little League and City at Vineyard Park). The proposed site plan for the project has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Planning and Engineering departments of the City and was the subject of a public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 28. Results of hearing was a 5 -0 vote in approval of the appropriatness of project in relation to zone, design and positive contribution to the community. It was further found that it represented no negative environmental impact on the surrounding area. The work would be done and financed by the Alta Loma Riding Club subject of step -by -step approvals of the City. Cost to City would be for installation of a 2" water meter and provision of water. (This is also done with Citrus Little Longue.) Request agenda date of March 7 to week authorization from Council to proceed with an agreement between :ity and Alta Loma Riding Club, subject to the conditions of the'Plannina Commission_, for a tam pora� siding ring a- HeriEage- Park.— uP stir, authorization 16 re ueste� to install And operate a_2° water meter in support of the pro ec . BH 0 I + +� r {�a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7. 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Bubbs. City Engineer SUBJECT% PARCEL NAP 4866 Attached for Council adoption is Resoluticn 79- approving Parcel Map 4866 located in Red Bill vent of the Cucaconga Crock. This Parcel Map covers land which are a part of approved Tract 9589 which was recently approved as a part of those tracts new eligible for building. This parcel map vill record to allow tranefor of ownership on ahe lots shown Respectfully submitted � LLOYD City F near LH:dcb attachments 0 —.-wK V zi J7 a� �a r i Affir XS� �yV� 's:e4 „� ” i • 1, yJ17,�, r stir kyIS ,3 ; `� .+: ,�d• '�:'} ' o t) e 5 V 1a 79` ,L—Lj ald ,a tl 3 f a w y!, `J ' ^Q% {..•+j�''•,a I it t JO I [ r :' r 9 ' .izi i :(d ;. d •• • �^ � 1 . `1 N l i�:i�:. �Xi,Y �' �' `�_♦ •;I .. \.�`t'IrF� 1 ^�' .ter ••lip i1`�.i,+ Y�Q'. �., A� ' � ] ^' � y � ! -1 `:,.• 1'• � t o 'f��(.,'Z' iii. f�q 1 w._ ` ""�'^`_• �i { . ',.Lin 'u.' 114A i,un LLJ '�t. •o, V , .wh).. � ,R• r a Y , f YWif 1'�- �IYR *{��•Y.SF1a E "": .���.. +,x •,:�Ij Q:�j t�'�., s ��'���.i 1�..,. r:.'���'I'.���.t •i ,I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CUCAMONGA CREEK BRIDGE CONSTFIICIION AGREL'03T Attached for Council review is a copy of the draft agreement for the con- struction of bridges over the Cucamonga Creek. This agreement obligates the City to deposit with the Flood Control District $436,692 prlur to April 1, 1979. Tho City Council previously committed SB325 funds in the amount of approximately $440,000 to cover tbesa coats. To data, the City has accrued $220,000 in this fund. By Apr1l -1, we can expect to have approximately $260,000. The City is therefore negotiating with the County to allow us to pay the $180,000 deficiency through the m:nthly committment of our SB325 Funds. Until thtse arrangements have been worked out, the City Attorney has recommended that the attached agreements not be executed. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the-. the Council review the attached agreements and instruct staff to pureut financial arrangments for the contract amount. Reagectfully subm ttcd, L OY BBS Cit gineer LH: deb attachments i 0-6. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .(?an&4n=dii'Ate&U t PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Flood Control District fxfxW T!•,/ Un., rM» faro• /le /.L/ ft /,f Lp,w.v 111 /13f Y�p/f City of Rancho Cucamonga Egineering Department P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California Attention: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Gentlemen: January 12, 1979 File(i h -9s2 /g.R p9: u C17Y 0 ANCHO CUCAIJONGA Cix1111MITY DEVEtoFMEPIT DEPT. 91730 JA(11 5 1919 AN 181n1UI�i1t21319E0FM Re: :one 1, Cucamonga Creek, Phase Y C/E Improvement Project Agreement Ho. A789/01036 Forwarded herewith for yalr approval and execution are six (6) copies of Agreement Ito. A789/01036 for the 4th Street, Hellman Avenue, 6th Street. 8th Street, Vineyard Averse, 9th Street, and Arrow Route Replacement. Bet- terment, and Common Use. The total estimated City cost of betterment is $436.692 and is to be deposited into the Flood Control District funds on or prior to April 1. 1979. Upon completion, please return the six (6) executed copies to this office for submittal to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Board of Super- visors. A completely executed copy will be sent to your office for your records. If you have any questions, please contact Hr. Nina S. Ghaly, Chief, Federal Claims Section, at (714) 383 -2198. M;G:dlf Very truly yours. C. J. Di Etetro, Flood Control Engineer By B.L. Escobar Chief Assistant Flood Control Engineer �5 I RFPLACEMENT, BETTE RliENT, AND C 0H Ii ON USE A G R E E M E III Cucamonga Creek, Phase V Bridge Crossings At 4th St., Hellman Ave. 6th St., 8th St., Vineyard Ave., 9th St. and Arrow Rt. THIS AGREEHEhT, made and entored into this day of 1979, by and between the CITY OF NANC10 CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT ". W 1 7 N E S S E T H WHEREAS, CITY is owner of or exercises cognizance over certain rights of way and easements for street and highway Irirposes for certain public roads, hereinafter referred to as "ROADWAYS "; and WHEREAS, the flood water of the Cucamonga Creek hereinafter referred to as "CREEK ", pose a serious threat to health, life, and private and public properties including said ROADWAYS; and WHEREAS, the United States of America by and through the United States Army Corps of Engineers, hereinafter referred to a, "CORPS', proposes to construct a flood control facility and appurtenances thereto, hereinafter referred to as "CHANNEL ", in accordance with plans cntitled Cucamonga Creek Channel, hereinafter referred to as "CHANNEL PLANS ", for the purpose of aiding in the confinement of waters of CREEK through CITY, and WHEREAS, DISTRICT is owner of or is acquiring lands for the construction r of CHANNEL: and A789/01036 Page 1 of 8 pages WHEREAS, DISTRICT is local interest representative for coordinating construction of CITY'S facilities within CHANNEL, and obtaining rights of way for CHANNEL; and WHEREAS. DISTRICT desires to conditionally occupy portions of ROADWAYS with constructed CHANNEL; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to conditionally occupy portions of DISTRICT lands with ROADWAYS facilities and public utilities; and WHEREAS, neither CITY nor DISTRICT entertains objection to the occu- pation of these portions of their lands or rights of way to be used by the other, which lands and rights of way are hereinafter referred to as "AREAS OF C"ON USE ", and are outlined In cross hatching on attached sheets marked EXHIBIT "Al through A7" and are made a part hereof; and WHEREAS. DISTRICT is willing to replace CITY'S facilities which removal Is made necessary by reason of the construction of CHANNEL with replacement fdcilities of equivalent function, as determined by the State of California Department of Water Resources, hereinafter referred to as REPLACEMLNTS; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to have DISTRICT Improve several of the existing CITY facilities, which improvement of existing fatuities shall hereinafter be referred to as BETTERMENTS; and WHEREAS, said REPLACEMENTS AND BETTERMENTS are itemized and th" con- struction costs are presently estimated on attached sheets marked Exhibit "A ", made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to incorporate REPLACEMENTS AND BETTERMENTS into construction; and WHEREAS, CITY and DISTRICT will mutually benefit by setting forte herein the rights and responsibilities of each with the AREAS OF COMMON A769/01036 Page 2 of 8 pages 47 USE and with regard to construction and costs of REPLACEMENTS A140 BETTERMENTS NDW, THEREFORE IT IS MUTUALLY AGRrED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 CITY SHALL: 1 1 Acknowledge the right of DISTRICT, its successors, permittees, or assigns, to construct, reconstruct, operate, and maintain CHANNEL for flood contrul and water conservation purposes and for purposes of access under, over, along, and across AREAS OF COt010N USE without need for any further permit or permission from CITY. provided, howevor, that any such use by DISTRICT and /or others specified herein, shall not endanger, inter- fere, or conflict with the use of ROADWAYS by CITY or the traveling public without first obtaining approval as set fe th hereinafter 1 2 Approve BRIDGE PLANS and plan; as set forth in SECTION 2, Paragraph 2 3 of this Agreement. 1.3 Submit to DISTRICT, at least 30 days in advance, plans for any proposed construction, reconstruction, or maintenance within AREAS OF COMMON USE which may occupy, endanger, conflict, or interfere with CHANNEL or its functional operation, and obtain written approval from the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT of such plans which approval shall not be withheld, provided that the work contemplated does not or will not, in the opinion of the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT, unreasonably con- flict with, interfere with, or endanger CHANNEL or its functional operation. 1.4 Indemnify the United States of America and the DISTRICT, their officers, agents, and employees against and hold them free and harmless A789/01036 Page 3 of 8 pages / 1, of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting f -om, acts or omissions on the part of CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in its operation and main- ' tenance of ROADIdAYS, and /or in the performance by CITY of any work within or adjoining AREAS OF COMMON USE 1.5 Accept full responsibility and cost for any and all reconstruction, maintenance, or operation of the REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS subsequent to transfer thereof to CITY, including that portion of street bridges lying above the plane of the soffit of the deck structure, and including roadway approaches, parapets, walkways, and railing Transfer of REPLACEMENTS and BETTEP14ENTS to CITY by DISTRICT for operation, maintenance, and responsibility shall be effective as of the date of final inspection and acceptance by authorized representatives of CITY and DISTRICT or within ten (10) calendar days of final inspection of CHANNEL by CORPS and DISTRICT whichever is sooner. 1 6 Upon billing by the DISTRICT, furnish and deposit funds with DISTRICT equal to the estimated cost of the proposed BETTERMENTS 'he cost of BETTER- MENTS shall include the design cost, office overhead, construction costs, construction engineering, and other costs directly attributable to this work incurred by DISTRICT. Total estimated cost to the CITY i four 1,undred and thirty -six thousand six hundred ninty -two dollars and no /100 cents ($436,692) as per attached cost breakdown, Schedule "A" 1 7 Promptly pay to DISTRICT actual costs in excess of estimated cost of BETTERMENTS as determined by audit in SECTION 3, Paragraph 3.2 of this Agreement. A789/01036 Page 4 of 8 pages Wq U SECTION 2 DISTRICT SHALL. 2 1 Acknowledge the right of CITY, its successors or assigns, to use AREAS OF COi410N USE in common with the public; to reconstruct, operate, and maintain public utilities, REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS; provided, however, that any such use by CITY does not or will not occupy, endanger, interfere, or conflict with CHANNEL or its functional operation without first obtaining approval as set forth hereinbefore 2.2 Prepare BRIDGE PLAITS, and plans as set forth in SECTION 1, paragraph 1 3 of this Agreement 2 3 Submit to CITY, BRIDGE PLANS for CHANNEL, REPLACEMENTS and BETTER - MEN'S at lerst thirty (30) days in advance. and plans for any proposed construc:ien, reconstruction, or maintenance within AREAS OF CORMON USE which may interfere or conflict with public use of ROADWAYS or endanger the safety of the traveling public, and obtain written approval from the City Engineer of CITY of such BRIDGE PUBIS or other plans, which approva'. shall not be withheld, provided that the works contemplated do not or will not, in the opinion of the City Engineer of CITY, unreasonably conflict or Interfere with the public use of ROADWAYS or errianger the safety of the traveling public. 2 4 Indemnify CITY, its officers, agents, and emuloyees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from acts or omissions on the part of DISTRICT, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees A789; 01036 Page 5 of 8 pages 76 I z to the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of CHANNEL within AREAS OF COMMON USE, and /or in the performance of any work, within AREAS OF C0440t1 USE 2.5 Coordinate construction of CHANNEL with -3RPS 2 6A Administer contract for construction of Arrow Rt Bridgo. 2 66 Coordinate construction with CORPS of REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS of 4th Street, Hellman Avenue, 6th Street, 8th Street, Vineyard Avenue, and 9th Street Bridges herein described and transfer to the CORPS costs of BETTERMENTS paid narein by CITY to DISTRICT for that crossings 2.7 Notify CITY ten (10) days in advance of final inspection of work encompassed by this Agreement 2 8 Promptly refund to CITY all funds in excess of at.tual cost of BETTERWITS as determined by audit in SECTION 3, paragraph 3.2 of this Agreement IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD Alin AUTUALLY AGREED: SECTION 3 3.1 Except as expressly set forth herein, this Agreement shall nit terminate CITY'S or DISTRICT'S rights within AREAS OF COMMON USE Both CITY and DISTRICT shall use AREAS OF CC14!ON USE in such manner as not to interfere unreasonably with tho rightc nr the other clothing herein con- tained shall be construed as a release or waiver of any Maim for compen- A789/01036 Page 6 of 8 pages 7l sation for damages which CITY or DISTRICT may have or may hereinafter acquire resulting from the construction of additional facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either CITY or DISTRICT in such manner as to cause unreasonable interference with the use of AREAS OF COMON USE by the uthpr party. 3 2 Within sixty (60) days after deteimir:tion of final accounting and reimbursability, analysis by Department of Water Resources, DISTRICT sha „ present to CITY a statement showing detailed breakdown of actual costs involved in the design cost, overhead, and other costs directly attributed to BETTERMENTS. CITY may audit DISTRICT'S accounting of BETTERMENT costs and verify DISTRICT'S statement of BETTERMENT actual : a • • a • • a a a • : • w • • a • a • w f k • a a • { • a a A789/01036 Page 7 of 0 pages 7� costs, which verification will not be unreasonably withheld should such additional auditing be necessary to clarify or adjust said statement. THIS AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be bind.ng upon the successors and assigns of ooth parties Ill WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorized APPkOVED AS TO FORM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Alan K. Marks County Counsel County of San Bernardino By Chairman, Board of Supervisors By San Bernardino County Flood Control District ATTEST: By— Secretary, Board of Supervisors San Bernardino County Flood Control District APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA By___ Mayor By T.ity Clerk City Attorney A789/01036 Page 8 of 8 pages 73 s 1t W I CUCAMONGA CREEK, PHASE V City of Rancho Cut amongo Bridges It ; R B C B+C D Betterment�l� Fourth Street 5' 29' 29' 58' 5' 34'(2) Hallman Avenue 5' 16' 16' 32' 2.75' 6 25' Sixth Street 2.75' 16' 16' 32' 5' 6 25' Eighth Street 2.75' - 16' 16' 32' 2 75' 4.01 Vineyard Avenue 5' 29' 29' 58' 5' 31 3' Ninth Street 5' 16' 16' 32' S. CArrow Route 2 75' 16' 16' 58' 2.75' (1) Includes additional width for sidewalks (2)bali for City of Ontario and half for Rancho Cucamonga L Exhibit "A" r CUCAMONGA CREEK, PHASE V United States Amy Corps of Engineers Improvement Project Cost Estimate for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Use $66 00 per sq ft. Total $304,788 Total Widening Cost Piers extension cost at 8th Street (1) Sub -Total 103 Contingency Sub -Total 203 C/E d F C D Engineering and Overhead Total (1)Estimate (2 )Half of the betterment for City of Ontario $304,788 26,040 330,828 33,082 363,910 72,782 $436,692 Exhibit "A" A789/01036 75 Betterm+.nt Width Length Area Cost Fourth Street 17'(2) 44.39' 755 S 49,830 Hellman Avenue 6 25' 139 67' 873 57,618 Sixth Street 6 25' 48 44' 303 19,998 Eighth Street 4 0' 110.56' 442 25,172 Vineyarc Ave 31 5' 65 12' 2,051 135,366 Ninth Street -- 47 47' -- -- Arrow Route 4 0' 48 52'(1) 194 12,804 Total $304,788 Total Widening Cost Piers extension cost at 8th Street (1) Sub -Total 103 Contingency Sub -Total 203 C/E d F C D Engineering and Overhead Total (1)Estimate (2 )Half of the betterment for City of Ontario $304,788 26,040 330,828 33,082 363,910 72,782 $436,692 Exhibit "A" A789/01036 75 ir= _µ,,.{.1t r * i `• i ��Iry ,ej, r • � T ; ,' Set 0.,o 300% 40 ' ` �,••,t�YF r i 1i3 L' p NB 9.32 Jt'W a17,6/' J , f'OURTH— , 0 37944 a7 c : _ a76`. 376 2s• , STREET f.� (SAN BERNARD /NO AVENUE) r� .tY .• Area of COmrman -USY' N ry /U�� •• 40 11 03 • `• � ' 0031AtJ p� '110 %\ W .O , i� r ''• D 2 W /. •1 • 673' °.: ;� : • e:, .p 029A`s ��0 673 873. i'. . D Ar J %1 x111 s s Jl. °g9 40g' 0 °22 • 1 :.w tA �•�3 Y1 h e� T�. GO1 • '••r hS•. 566 Acs o g33 � � Ss• o R 2622 ° A`s o• i •h ZISZ .. •1 O �':' x .sf' h 6E 6 "YI ••�,� .,) <i :,•5 +' e�l`.�1'f'iy i� ..i :f f.`• yS,1 Ir•1 +•. •i 1: ,1 {:�,�i�Xg�M �,. •' 't A °: � ' •' '� -Yfis• • tiv% , r ,�1 r- <* _�:li'�i { :Y • 111039 t AL 3 , . JA%l i 213 • ° NB2 °92'2! "£ 0 6 D 75 g7J' , ^•� �� See O'P %300//38 8 r SAN BERNARDINO kCOUNTY%I FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT'[' CUCAMONGA CREEK I, I 31evIS1o11s owu. by r ,opt[,; PORTION OF` TRACT NO. r2�44e,M)B 38/64• L ^+: J€.D. fl••6 ='7 r •r . •jrs :t BEJW.:EN v6 "$TREET'AtyD• pOURTH StREE�T• ! r• ��" � +�• 3 • k'�1.; .' 1.'' Y` �rn<e{2!•b•Sita,t.:r.:•R•�fl:., Tw�+7t'+2� t rY,':xl. J•::'>%r ✓E H1B'I•T+ A'1� 1 a.Sf�..t ,a¢'Z,,,r.• :,4'fii:tiy r v�: .: ', ":.:.•/./St,;,d t� . �5 /.,a I � r � 7 ;'r , !! t '. '•" ,. r7 Yt Iii 1 n 't({•S (r • :•fir 1 °r;%` 1 4yI` L �� y.•t ' /•)'lt.: t: i {SC", �' `i J :Af. 3' !" G' tai r� �' ♦~r{ {.,�;r_]�(`T� � i {r (. ,: :li'+4a'j' ha.... �,�•.t+,�+•� {,J�, .t , c °,. 't•„n:• '« 3i't: �4. Y'�ai 1t}}�tt.'�.1•''i )' }+��`• /LS �' at''.i =,,j y1�f,•'CLIl .. \• • f`',� 1, ,'� • "7�(• 3�: w;� �.i, �,l �f•�� tAi, ,. , 1 ♦+ 1!-:!' f � , vii t. Jc °,.•!tt•Rj �,�. EET.%:. ..n, ;a i. ,: t• 6 „'�'d;•i: r: a �t•,r Y, 3,:{ff�.' '!' � '..� ` • 1. f RE,(l e 'ityiLJ'•.T':ZaN• ��4Z,. .t • V • ' } •l/1: r••TV N � � Oa!•DPLa •l !l.AF ♦ _ '1 y1” 1'4 Early y Q QGEGtl R�/Y •� �.: -aacn ry i vow' Pi 's 1 �Q,La- pe.c�Eiaj..•k*� Xegm%,J� '••'�, •vasbrcw• saw•• tArea of Cm;lmon�Uae_ \ `fp)/�� +►, 3d� r.f ,..{ t .t r 1 ` N� '1 ,ate F•�'. :•t,'Ir w •C�' c•cty oo• �� t. ' A p,•A.d� •RI ,t• t h. . ld clew ' • '�4 '' f• _ •� 76 �'D�b• TE • %.• �F� f�j •p �aat l QElMlin9.�:t I '•.r .a•�'`r•" • 't i•�v.datSV A)44. ::fYAr, :Ttf. i %�•,ti•} C` r _� d 'M y'j f 1 jlg +i%�XfiT) �`�{ {Y!F IN n SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTRO L . DISTRICT ' CUCAMONGA CREEK REVISIONS OriIE .a,� {�!j %.� ^•r ' Fiu CucamW Londs MQ 4/9 ; e ;✓ Belweai.4/h'S/rlel and 61A.S /itel, .t /• �iirfi�'g1e. :.5; L•�.{,'ri`' t v, v - _ 1.1R /sSCt9����!�'} •, w.7. .TEE D. P / JOO //!6'� �' + ' ' '• ' �'f �' `�, y 1 v. /:w-.IJ�Ad /4r // 59 I �`. • = !'.L P t 353 . i v fa 2�,R JGALE /L �p.''� .� ,003 O (�• ) 1P zo Ad t. '4T, R • V , • REM • i; ., SO cz- i 70 N � 2 I • � ry ep op ' 1 • tT 6 y 's• N L Y a •� 352b °o v s % Area of Common 352c p u Use +, , i .: y, A �•q� 0 _ O t r��. M' � t e /�L.�ct•�,n ...1 �• •�fl .. �'� �'. �{i. kt: ^'.lt • �,�,. '•f' �•'� ° fiwo '. 1f�: • Fir �. r�y4 4�., .� I �'.'Q ' - •• �' •., � o ,1 '• JAN 12 1379' f i j]• :i• •r o so•oes7 w 97.00' $IX TH t7 o . TSTREFT -- 8q _Lfw Sec DP. 1300 1143;ox''� /a SAN TBERNARDINO COUNTY' FL60D + CONTROL` DISTRIE, ' Y:' CUC.AMONGA CREEK''" ` REVISIONS CW, '. ! YyA 'tF,V;' i jJ.ED., 8-3Q+ w,'Sp {fit a •PORTION OF CUCAMONOA LANDS'M.S. 4/9 �- . ', �'• f SE,jWEENr :Slh*TH STREE AP D EIOHTH'STREET. •iv°ltilt(i�-•i.s,..,_• {; �.4,Yi..;.', r', :r•It•f ;••�kf;'•'''�� "` •:::. " -,, fD ?'i.3off' t aff ZIP,(5001150 FA/.rlbSJJ s 7b r, an GL�'r OR C4 NLF I D PCR RS .lt7/so \ r .b y �z° 11 1 c c a J 6n, c n DR C99 3lr LYfw/[ �; FDA ! t(I�t ! • Qa14 Al •570w eoJ[q ,� O R[rf wR 1 _ ar'09 A:1 D 79C \ 2' a �n> TE 971 Qa'o Rcwr ��. �f1�9��Iw�ro TC voe lot I c �FY' •'o �4 `V.CO l9p 402 ! I. 404 T I c ) 5� �� D IWn`r'i48 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS DWN EY LATE .11J r041t >o ,/ga 9•/1•ld .f'MJf1i /ir.)7a lh FILE NO. OP ,[3co�i49 JAN 1 1979 EXHIBIT °A4" „AN 12 1479 x -- 070'.x! 9 - NL9•J9:siJ _ / sat BTREET A Area of Common Use Rae7714, /a 4'Id i. CUCAMONGA CREEK !;. POO CUCAA 0A'64 011,1,, -4R0 7R T I c ) 5� �� D IWn`r'i48 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS DWN EY LATE .11J r041t >o ,/ga 9•/1•ld .f'MJf1i /ir.)7a lh FILE NO. OP ,[3co�i49 JAN 1 1979 EXHIBIT °A4" „AN 12 1479 II� sr/ J�iC @1� _W •ye9 :9711 tn•• _ _- W W ` '3T3A 1 TE H pp i 1$ "dam 'lr W dr t� 1 , ol i:d it �-2- .- i 37Z A r ATiT -eaj� � ptst4 (l�l 372 D a pit td uEl pJ1� fi +� a CUCAMONGA CREEK Por - awdle/e /aw a/ Lo/ /O Q/co l�i�cya i Ti H,d %44' i n In JAN 12 W9 a . x001/49 P SAN BERNARDINOO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVIS91010/ OWN BY DATE {'O.lanc 9.29• d FILE NO. 300 %/ „r • E P 37Z aanrr/rr���m -.. D N °1 n Area of Common Use T Z \11 PRLWL�RT✓ L"CR/OEa /R 6 qa ,5'.0 6d ..•..1 -ti P•:,i J4 73 .y b � °— E ..Y4G 1b39 "E /S.SO tJGi � til4.4c i:d it �-2- .- i 37Z A r ATiT -eaj� � ptst4 (l�l 372 D a pit td uEl pJ1� fi +� a CUCAMONGA CREEK Por - awdle/e /aw a/ Lo/ /O Q/co l�i�cya i Ti H,d %44' i n In JAN 12 W9 a . x001/49 P SAN BERNARDINOO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVIS91010/ OWN BY DATE {'O.lanc 9.29• d FILE NO. 300 %/ Imo■ aee OP 41YA �,J75LS ••: ~ eta: Au e(ANIAOS D �•�,a x 195 iC p ate' 1/ _•� y� I �ti t. • � � R `�� � � y�e'•s� r' ,,,,p9 q Iho ^� 41 �a •,� \ Area of gowm0 Use qrs i', SiREET 394 TE le 1pv L4 D• . '6 �7e ° Q 393 B ° 1 \ r. 6- i� i4ae 44Sr �o hb : \ 9' � .oBO•xl �f �b0 �`• 59394 t v• lr� r /y CWN r/ .V Q {• y' a•/WW 376C ^`• LL U �D R' It 3938 52 A� a TE 0. a 378A Nie � d D . 09 378 B 0 ( t � 4, 76a B D D p r \ 375 - - y TE CUCAMONGA CREEK X192 Ce1C4.N0N6A LAN/J9 Between V.neyervI Avenue S 9w Sweet JAN 12 1979 1 I 1 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS 0 BY DATE ✓Sa •7 .•� -7d FILE N OPi 329/i5i 4 I h, R ■a+ . % NCH oP I OCO /IJy i 49 E Per. D °� �� e.• D 384 n t n v jlr� 0 r iR Q / I° v �Areo of Common Use 9 ARROW ROUTE —. ___ _ i r_. s•w saai9 Pi �j h ♦a )� 2 _ X10 3 EL � 0a� ? .r� .•q 1 —�1 TE � � S °•2i W �T.pie� a buu w P5 _ A r9790 Q 4 D a �S g • " �,t z +• Et A x v q9 3 B` `—I r_ � J• $ 1 li %J m r L i 3 P"t lj h w ` 49 0 .cos /i i s + 1 JAN 121919 , S see OP ;900 /15t SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT .RAR CL44MOM6.4 LA.V06 REVISONS DWN. BY DATE J9= 9-/5.7d ARROW ROUTC AT CHANNEL INTER5EL710N - ME .1 OP /300j '.9 Wb XH 4 AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting March 7, 1979 1. CALL TO ORDER. 2. PLEDGE TO FLAG 3. ROLL CALL: Mikels_, Palombo_, Schlosser , West_, Frost_ 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Feb 5. ANNOUNCEME'ITS. � CFebruary February J�. 1979. #up 6 CONSENT CALENDAR: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and none - controverslal. They will be acted upon by the Council at one tiaxo without discussion. Any Council somber, staff member, ­or interested party my re- quest that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion. a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $101,116 34 ......... ......... 1 b Request from Office of Community Development, San Bernardino.. . 7 County, to set u•date for a public- hearing for March 21 regarding a cooperative agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Housing Authority. C Request to accept bids and purchase stack chairs for the Cucamonga... 10 Neighborhood Facility. This item is included in current 78 -79 Budget approval by Council (d) Set public ho'p'ing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 79 -01 ! Sign Ordina, e - for March 21, 1979. ' (e) Tract 9321: Release bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc ............. 11 Performnce Bond (sewer) S 76,000 Performance Bond ((water) $ 54,000 Performance Bond road) ;154,000 (f) Tract 9315: Release bonds to John D. Lusk 6 Son ..... .. . ... ... 13 Performance Bond sewer S 16,000 Performance Bond water $ 20,000 Performance Bond road) $ 80,000 (g) Tract 9256: Release bonds to R. L Sievers 8 Sons inc... ... ... 14 Performance Bond swater S 58,000 Performance Bond %road) S 90,000 v City Council Agenda -2- March 7, 1979 (h) Tract 9398: Release bonds to Proud Construction Corporation.. .. 16 Performance Bond (sewer) $ 13,000 Performance Bond (water) $ 16,000 (1) Tract 9450 Release bonds to Crowelli'Leventhall, Inc .............. 17 Performance Bond (sewer) $ 33,000 Performance Bond (water) $ 46,000 ( Performance Bond (road) S114,0DO (,1) Tract 9449: Release bond to Thompson Assoc. Development Corp ... 19 Performance Bond (road) 5152,000 (k) Tracts 9586: Release of bonds to Thompson Assoc. Develop Corp ...... 20 and 9587: Landscaping d Block Pall S 74,894.88 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A Zone Chance No. 87 -78 submitted by Jerry Rodgers _ Changing the zone from FP -2 (Flood Plain) to A -P (Administrative - , Professional) for property located an the south side of Baseline, 775' west of Vineyard Avenue. ORDINANCE NO. 62 (Second Reading) ........... ...... ... .......... 22 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUt1CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO !/ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 207- 031-19 FROM FP -2 TO A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASELINE APPROXIMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. / ` I-w 10'07 9o-4-- B An Ordlnance:establishin revelations and liepnsing Procedures or reep n6 ogs_s Pets within the C tv %— ORDINANCE NO. 63 (Second Reams).. 23 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND LICENSING PROCEOURES.F R TH KEEPING, OF DOGS AS PETS WITHIN THE CITY. C 9911 cesf0 Establishment of Storm Drain and Systems ve oament ee, The Community Development Department is proposing for adoption the establishment of a storm Drain fee of $2,500 per acre to be applied to land divisions and the issuance of building permits and a Systems Development fee of one percent (lt) on the building valuation to be assessed at the time of development These fees will be used for the exclusive purpose of Planning, Engineering and constructing street and storm drain facilities. . City Council Agenda -3- March 7, 1979 \/ ORDINANCE NO. 61 , (Second Reading) ............... . ...... ........ 27 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO /CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT NEW FEE ON NEW DEVELOPMENT. RESOLUTION NO. 79- 10 ........ .... ........... .... ...... ....... ... 29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 61 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDINANCE N0. 65 (Urgency) .. . ... . .... .. .. ...... .... . 7aa XAN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 53 TO REVISE - STORM DRAIN FEE REQUIREMENTS ON PARCEL MAP AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. ORDINANCE NO. 60 _ .. .... ... ..................�D_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO XCUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH D. t-_A OOLaI by Paly Plastics Products requesting Waiver of TDrainage fees .. ..... .... .... .. .... ........... . 33 An appeal by Poly Plastics Products requesting waiver of-Drainage -- Fees on property located at 10220 Fourth—Street, Rancho - -Cucamonga. E. Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -02 - Amendlng the Howie`$?:......... . 37 ORDINANCE NO. 66 (First Reading) ... .... ... ...... : ..... ..56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO L CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMEN NO. 79 -02 WHICH REPEALS SECTION 61.025A(b)3, AMENDS SE 61.022 AND ADDS SECTION 61.0219(a)9 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 17. F. Zone Change No. 97 -65 and 98-65 - Vanguard - A change..:1........... 57 ORDINANCE NO. 67 (First Reading) ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,fir All GRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 202 - 171 -47 (ZC 97 -65 d 9a -65) City Council Agenda -4- March 7, 1979 8: CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. Heritage Park: Request authorization to permit Alta ................ 60 Loma Riding Club to temporarily locate riding ring at Heritage Park - by Bill Holley. B. Approval of Parcel Mao 4866 ..... ............... .................... 61 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4866 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4866) C. A royal of draft a reement with Count Flood Control ............ ... 62 or construct on o r ge over Cucamonga ree 0. Authorizatrandf Mayor to sign agreement between Chamber ............ *83 of Comnzrcty for the prepa ration of the speclflc plan for t trial areas designated on the land -use element of the dyAer 9. CITY ATTORNEY 10. NEW BUSINESS a. Council b. Audience 11 ADJOURNMENT - School Fee Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 79 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE. FOR TFE LICENSING OF DOGS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. NHEfFAS, the law of the State of California requires that dogs kept within the State be licensed NON, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, shall Impose a fee requirement for the licensing of dogs BR IT FORTNER RESOLVED, that the following charges are established: I. For each male dog, ten and no /100ths ($10 00); 2. For each neutered male dog, with proof of neutering, five and no /100th, ($5.00); 3. For each spayed (neutered) female dog with proof Of spaying, five end no /100chs ($5.00); and 4. For each unsppyed female aog, ten and no /100ths ($10.0n). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a penalty in the amount of five and no /100the ([5.00) shall be added to each license fee for failure to pay such fee within thirty (30) days after such license fee shall fall due. BE IT FUCIHER RESOLVED, that the owner of any dog, which owner moves into the City from another community, urAn the presentation of a rabies vaccination receipt signed by a licensed veterinarian and a license receipt from another community for the current year, may be Issued a Rancho Cucamonga license tag upon the payment of one and no /100th ($1.00) to cover the cost of the tag BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between July 1 and December 31 of the current year shall be subject to the regular annual license fee Any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between January 1 and March 31 shall be subject to one -half (y) the annual license fee. Any dog reaching the age of four (4) months between April 1 and June 30 shall be subject to one - fourth (k) the annual license fee. 3 i i J Z, {c a m W 0 a H m M ai a N '1 U L 2 n m b b v m m n n n m N m N rl v ti N I'1 •i rl N m m N N V1 O a a m Q N N O O A O F `t O O v� a w w M m asa � a 4 K C C N T F F a a a F F 03 V M N q O a a 4 N M u U N uo u� O W n VF u u � � w N q 7 C m C °u O C h T M r qu a, 0 w 0 13 zol a .9 :1 x 1: 0 fl, E. UO �M�.0 0 0 0. U) I � 3L o U0 4 u ck c c c 14, w c u . . . 14 0 0 0 .0 00. s 0 0 r. a 0 0 U3 a A. E� 2: M Z U4 t. u L* NE 0 Q v UU 41 4 A 4 a 0 0 Is u :N -0 0 0 >.a a 4c 0 u c 0 c u M CL 0 00, 0 u 0 US z .0 41 0 c V U) b, a 16 or wr* 4 r , 0 C3 x 14� M r 14 0 >1 ri um 0 u u u Y; • z c� „ u 1, u M O II mb0 0 m O m 0 O O YO bON o o r b f•1 O b0 mn O O O O m O 141 N P • . O O N f P O .f zz Q O 1 ii U n C C V '• X U � \ O U M m N P V U U v � +tl1 f1 A P H• • tl•� M1 P P P b q H A q w > q q q m V, a M N A m M N H O NN H H H E a S a m S E r(.., U a Hw a0+ T >s • CF b.a m .tli >. T �. Ww N \ U U O t . u U y q M L N U O N m H 11 N q q q Wyye1 PP U q q M U M q \ G V N./ V w q HN TOi m Cq A C A w i • f1 U n n m A A oC. k iU/l N P.1 o W a W > O W a W u O a H M a 0.W m F i N CNO N m.-1 P Q N N N Om ON P N m wl Q N N f•11'IN O NN P N N N N bN NN N N N N 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 P rC0 Oi 00 P N P P P PO PN O P .•1 O N N r•1 N b N P N .-1 M N N i-1 ri N r•1 rl N N r-1 Q N I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 11 11 I 1 1 uI I N a o0 0 a 0 0 a 0 a 0 0 00 00 0 0 a 0 0 n o a a 0 00o w H O m C S U y U O U H 0 O v U H V V q tl Y O U V N M O m U 11 Q y m O 6 O C T O M U G N U .ml 11 .~1 q y1 H O U M M H O U .X w .0 4 O h 6a1 u s° ' .mi z a �IW {11p �1�ryp ��N�lm m rM��q<NnN qlq szm 0 N C 0 .00 83 h et 7 q 0 N q N m u 1` 3343 d m nwlo e d q H \+1 VN N { P�MU NI�riN al�rO O r. ee q N N 4o M g O O N a a e gI M I I M AAq a hl q M O C ] N w 4 aO � 4W4 la myOC.N I 61 q I T C • O n N y O W •I [ I N 7 ruNCCl 1 'O ~i !D a e uC M 8 N U d CT > CI q U EaE.� t d t H M N d iO .IW ggCd Cd10 C N a .1 0 d A U 4 a Y m W U U >� 0 m u m m N 4 q 4 Opq [ [ I am.i 1Om0URIN ° O K nrO ma a z m N u z a w m F a V. a O..° mm N N N O N ry q o 0 0 O N N N u N N q q O q 1� tl N N rl I 1 I 1 4 1 0 N ry N rN C Z A M O L I b I N 1 O• 1 1 { s••[ t q1� u z u 1 U O O 8 0 O '1 M M KU ++ a s z° a� O N N N q N N N q q H n1 q 1� O N N rl I 1 I 1 1 1 q I ry ry N rN O O O q q O q I b I N 1 O• 1 1 { s••[ t q1� O O O O N C b d ti w U O U N U C m 4 > Ma w q g y T .M.1 tl o 0 U a v .w+ O N W V N h f0 C .dl w ti d F q CC0 C N U `a ° a a 0 0 y F a° a° N i I 2 N b n 0 q W n q q q q N r r n n U N N N N N q �, O NON PIDNt7 q O OgIO N N 1 nO N q ti P N N n fl f7 N PNNMIPgP O YI NNO Yf y N m N M u M a � r � C q a m E w u b L N N V 1 I J rl N O L 0 C i „ U1 'H CC1 3 w 0 � > \ 1 1 � a �a c N N N N q N q 40 8 W U E L 0 U U M Q U 1 U Z V U U M IDy .,�j C4 M W qG 'C q S m U (LM C H 0 I C n1 C 0 x.01 U U 7 p 0. L T 0 w U M M N C www WUU M 4 4 K q q T 1 N 4 M M .-10 1 010 I: E W M U 1+1 7 C 6 U N .,0j U U 4 .y q 0 0 q N C 4 N q Y N A d q W 7 U • N U O W h 4 1. .� .r q 7 y O 0 C 4 N U1 N N tT N {� U1 q G q h F wz 3 m w U a U FTwZS� w a 5 a� a N N N NN N N N 1D q NPYfOONO N q hN 1 I I 11 1 I I I N NNNVINNM O N NN V n O O O O N q q I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 O P rd N NN N N N nl q NN "'1 ^I "1 "�NN N N N I I t i i l l 4 I I 1 1 a o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 000000u 0 00 u L L N q >1 u o u a N C N U ? N N 0 ; N V 41 C4 0 C O C N M 4 U U ro0 V N w N L W 0 L N N M 0 O U 0 4 O M �4 0 4 0N U 0 1 !C U I 0 N 0 A .! 4 O 7.0 M .1 >1 N U •-1 V ti 8 V H O M x-01 0 0 x 0 7 �. 0 C N M . k w X a +OI N N n 9 X 4 4 a U v �' - o I!! z .R ZI O b M1 W P O •M1 W P O N ,I'1 U W P P P P O O O O O O O O l ' N O V O O O O O O O N O O OPO y, 7IP N 0 O O O O O O O Y1 O O ❑z b la t� O O P P N L M1 M1 W N N O N � a N N N o' .ter m w lia a ci A N w W x W W W W F 14 W W a b e a c e c e e U a p F U O O M N N M W ` y O Q K IK u F w 0 W w W O a N O O i W P1 U q ro ro b ro O 13 4 M a W F F W P N to N !A N N O O O N I 1 I 1 1 I Ij N Yf N N N N P P O O O O O P O O ry O O '/ U V 1 t I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I ro a w y d 4 ,aw+ o y w � a uo A 1 u m c a c 0 EqE 0 m T Y .I c N ! @OLD y .4 b .-1 0 y b vi y C N 4 E[ H U h W N wq M emB > a U m h Y c. 177 nal t7 g h a y J • • H E H 0 R A N D U M To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Date: February 28, 1979 Subject: Cooperation Agreement - City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County Housing Authority The Office of Community Development, through Phil Rush, Houoing Development Specialist, requested that a public hearing date be set by the City Council to discuss the above referenced subject. - Request that on March 7, Council act by Resolution (HUD Requirement) a public hearing for March 21 at which time Mr. Rush will be present to make a presentation to Council. Information to Council will preceed 21st meeting BH /mw 7 � r ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(000) 1117 Em Mitt Stns - San orm arlUra. CA 92415 • (71413812745 February 12, 1979 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Box 793 - 9340 Basline Av. - Unit A Pancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Or Wasserman: County of San Bernardino 1 R ANN SIRACUSA aI.MM The Office of Corm pity Development would like to schedule two agenda dates before your City Council to discuss a proposed Cooperation Agreement between- the City and the County Housing Authority In a recent housing advertisement, issued by the Department of Hbusing and Urbyn Oavelopmznt, 119 net p:Ibllc housing Units were allocat ^d to the Nveride - San Bernardino Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SI(SA) Ttie HousiNg Authority of San Bernardino County is currently prezarirg At. oprlicatioa for approximately IrS of these units to be located on sca :tcred sites throughout the County. To date, specific sites have not bran selected. As part of the fo7nal application, Couberation Agreemnts must be negotiatai bttueen the Housing Authority and all local governmental jurisdictions whbre proposed sites are located. In this light, agreeirents wail be reque,tcd from all Community Development cooperating cities, as well as the County Bear(.- of Supervisors. Enclosed are backup materials for the proposed Cooperation fgreement including, a sample agrecreltt. resolution for public hearing, etc. Since then aro t1rre constraints involved in tre submittal of a fonnai application to H7D, the Office of Ccn7unity Cevelopment requests your assistance in scheduling time rot the City Council agenda to authorize and conduct a public hearing fu regard to the proposed agrnoncat It should be noted that at least two agenda daC:s will be required. One date to authorize notice of a public hearing, and the second date, at least tvo weeks later, to hold the actual hearing. Page 1 r.= f LETTER TO: HR LAUREN HASSERJNH February 12, 1979 Page 2 of 2 I will be contacting you in regard to this matter before February 16. 1979 Any questions can be answered at that time, or 1 can be reached at 383 -3764. Sincerely, EIIVIROII14ENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF C"UNITY DEVELOP14ENT R. ARN SIRACUSA, Director 6aj a- PHIL L. RUSH, Housing Development Specialist I LR:se Enclosures xc: Dill Holley 9 I?-I • 0 M E M O R A N D U M Date: March 2, 1979 Tot Lauren Wasserman Front Bill Holley Subject: Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility Lauren, request Council authorization to solicit bids and award oruchase order for 200 stack chairs, 20 folding tables, 1 thair dolly and 1 table dolly for the Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility which is due to open in May. Item was included and approved in this year's budget. Request agenda date of March 7 for Council consideration. BB 0 M.. w 1.111 • el w 3.1911 •ItOCIl11O 1VCIYIII{ 1\ l a l l f 0\ r• a 1 y I I I a l t I 1 V[ Wwq.C4xOtIN �•1: f r { Y f 7 14 01[,15 (\ r. Itr , , _ •, 1 .; I'n I ,! •111'!=•.11 Located on the vest side of Sapphire Street at illgllland SCALE , r•so' Avenue and Alta Lana Drive ,OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. 1:60 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 • {27 Performance Bond (Sever) $76,000 Perforsance Bond (Water) $54,000 33 20 e, • Performance Bond (Road) $154,000 -- `;Y••• /. NOSE: The sanitary ewer and water systems yore approved by °:• •t : the Cucamonga County Water District on February 9, 1979. �ff �A The road construction has been approved as being in 32 i' 29 accordance with the Road Impruvement plane and it is -1 recommended that the roads be acceptt•d Tile Improve - =nts include curb and gutter, eidwalks, paving, walla i and street signs - 31 30 q _ G _ t, /t j 8 1• 19 •C 20 ?' 211 —•S ilt t II )i$ 10 tt f g :it 6 11 T l4 6 llti I •y, S ^. ,1: J N 1 14I611LAND '• IIf ••cN •q Cr` /li..•. ,�' , jf �` ^Ifl�•` S�:.I ",`Ia �'_ /,. Gi. OLL SB r 55' AY�'r t.•, f„ 66 s r 67 sutltM /y1•T� /ww s•vI� t'- Te.;& to 5T 60 �),1 "•�65' :f/ GoMdj 1� •i j_ N 62 ' 63 70 1 SSSS1 1111I I V /M"nn C T NO. 0 • 1 :••u11 o u.+le wcl.Int1t1 l tf", r ^1 l< • ♦ pt.l w, V[sOlw w•Iry. 1 +.11111 P+ tS tl[t • 1• t S'• :.[ ;1•.10' ' a [� 43 it- .:.424'x.' n� .1'••• a 35 b 34 44 tL _ �t{ S i •.a 33 a` 28• '�_�.t�LQ.) ii •' °� i� Al rl t' •n• ,a�� � ` ( 29 Y} 40:? 32 Ii t• _ ' 46 .1 J••'�' i 3g rtb 37 :1•ei .! N __ „r' r 1 t pqq '+ o 4 39 L, "v. .r �C� 31 �. 30 •4'' 47 �' •` "e,�t�'-- +ri.ILi-'a'� r +J49 /�� �.r s� •t�r-- {— .."lcr— J.w Is_wsct Z_ •r U 1. (? r• �,/ � t� t? ay .• :� �.: .t ^.. 9 $��,: \t • i M� ✓J�� 16 i�: 17 jI' 19 19 •. 1, � 49 1 %. + •" 13 't 12 '1 11 Vi 10 • 4'^J \� ••'V HIG1H.a atw MWD,•R/W) � r•� / l P l . ry 54'•1� .lt a 58 65 'c• 52-- 56 61 53 55 -IS 1 1 'Y. .:•(ci Cal L: q aL •aiar cI .CtC '! eel- II•^VCr -•C, •&,D CW411 TKvll a Itf- Y•1•1 4 • 100 ' FOUNDAJYY on the northwest corner of Sixth Street and y�Located Archibald Avenue !!r OWNER: John D Lusl- 6 Son 17550 Gillette Avenue \ t t P. 0 Box C -19560 t Irvine, California 92713 •: ! Performance Bond (Sewor) $16,000 t Performvnce Bond (Water) $20,000 - I Performance Bond (Road) $80,000 I MOTE: The sauitary seder ano water systems were arproved by the Cucamonga County Water Dletrict on February 9, 1979 �v4 •/ The road construction has been approved as being In accordance with the Road Improvement plans and it in ' recaaoended that the roada be accepted. The improve- ment- include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls ' ano street signs. I � I , 1 11;..1/I ► it r ,,, JI ../ mot.: .Yl.1 lJ rV .V .•• -.:, of tjVrOR MATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA .YwL /?f'fN1M Or ne .f D/ Mf _n/ W IOII 1 I+7 D. G4PLw !- LI '••'dF/ 19.151)..0 /ff0.Y� /f Y/I ✓ IYT4..Yh ^ iJr L rv� i6 p rvl a' ne drav d /+! LDlpfe G -1 L?L +Yf p/ � w M/M•!'J.M, lY'/ G f..m I w,'fl1.7N Ila- MYLPbrG MC //AAT /; /11G /�, Lorata� sc Ole nortbeast rar.. s of 6111slde Arad and ld Meryl Street 1 v I a h. Q.LiS: R. i.- Sievers i Soas Inc. e ♦!: 6t81 9rangetlnrpe Avenue, Suite 8 a� tie ft-=a Park. California 90620 �••"^"' ! Pezforsumu Pond It:aierl $58.000 . s Perfotaaxe thud Mad) 690,000 IMI'd:t 1'x sanitary voter system vas approved by the , Casaaeeiga C,ouary Vater District on febrvary 9, 1979. ibe road enCtrtrnctl.on has been approved as being in accordanu vlth the Road Improvement plans and It Is , rerommeadrd t-it the roads be accepted. the Improve- ments Include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs. f / f^ tip / �/' }L• X/ s I i s FA ,, J�• /a•.r•�to - ! • Itb rr � ii ..r N /LC1ip6 0 �J I e I l , • pM „{X N1 4640' i� } I+ Cs� o tY � �a I� IE •:ir�ro•e♦ muu IN UNINCORPORATED f I• RRI TORY OF I I IE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA MN. 14fY »•V.• G, rM .11' 0.1, ..(r d /C,! ! ,,-c 01I ' 1, ar...a•c. .r♦ wn "'v, `rb - ceo. • r. -, s e, ..ea .. b, en.Cr N rH lrCnm.,e d w M." er J.. "' ' V. J." 0I C., J,e.v N, J.0M a 4lNerfIN47. /AC_ MAACN /97G 2' ♦ � /pA(MONO 37Rffr l�� ar -r %q.. }'...,.N •jraJ',r1 Ar .Onr.p N,r Jr,O XYIW /'_ Me, z.f�... nr./ r4✓ _ prrir,ryt.rr. s.a \ /y,F.d T/tibY.l Nd aAa rJl s•rr p.r• cwu• .`�( \II} v �: 'sf 't • � i i r,r nv� rI t o a 13 __ � rw•. — _ �v ri•.Ne v err � I - � •o•neS t,.r "_ n�N� � .r•�dr mcv �C I n /a"'"•i!6:.7F"i.. atvd'r.p t ' i 2Fj a W } W 11 11 I .'•e ��I ~�j• I �; nni 1 wvn`• i t, 2, a ,�, > \` I 1t � 1 It h le sit d• r, �• t •t r �� ti6 ri�i/ \ I �� tee rr � I% �•, O G° 7. Located to he northwest corner of Beryl -Oct and I Banyan Street G� ' : OWNER: Proud Construction Corporation IO t 14491 Raintrec Road Tustin, California 92660 �2 . 13 •� Performance Bond (Sewer) $17,000 14„1 Performance Bond (Water) $16,000 NOTE: The sanitary eater system was approved by the Cucamonga county Water District on January 31, 1979 The sewer bond is requested for release since the 1 circumstances changed the developer's Plans and S� individual septic systems were installed. L Cz w to W'I.hON Av °NV& f- J 1_ w iu Z a •1 N i N 2 �t•JT re1GT ra ` N NO.911te e 1" 0 J C1 pl _• _ T 2 � 4 ` • i F J r. F, Ct C) .n F ,• 0 Z C l Z t v P�GNYAN STREET r— "�=. LOC/_\71011 MA,,P � No hcnue ICJ V 1 i f � TR*CT NO. 91450 Located between Ramona Avenue and Uermosa Avenue at La Vine Street OWNER: Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Sewer) $37,000 Performance Bond (Water) $46,000 Performance Bond (Road) $114,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on January 22, 1979 The road construction has been approved ss being in accordance with the Road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted,. The improvements include curb and gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs I ^4 .rl�..r �:.I�. .JJVri•� rVrM 1 9Y 1 �w [r rr .11 �r4. 1.1 '111 f�.l' L • Nr• / MI' 1 r.,lr •M tr•w 1 ' 4 t II ' .�I•I ul [Itr q• \^ •�1 M [�• Y Ir +r rl rr'nllr _r .�I .�4 I1Y IIw.1. wl•I• 1 • 1.1 r r 1 �I I„ rrl . . 1 f11\ 111• v4I • IY I[Y: rr.r �• vl.a r.M M ^.r _.rr rrll 1. ® • ♦ ,. t1M M. r .4� w I•r •.1.1• •1 M Ctil• 1•I •r',.Ir •1 11•. 11 Y f11M 1. IM •111[• •f \Y (f!•tC tc ♦I Vr /,� M i i .01 �' wlr•.r i • w t v_ I l_q.y lr IoI nq,i •w/ 4 r1 rJ uea! rrs rl jP irw r�Fta PI I IJ fJ IIOMM I 141�� JJM 111 tIM Y'V4 )J if I/U i• W (/Y •N M... to .T.YIOfr C' Ior cot", N I.. /...... WO, CIf/fO.M1 4NYOOVOA A047 • of slob I CNGYNq npwf](,0 IlfffulpN 1.Nas ICCOfO/YL ro It,r Irwwo /N /•JON'/ or YI/'t,,ICC ,( rfrwaf w 1 ( J'v M 11 of I", t or f,V,(Ar to, J.mur f!., /h..,..fhN..tC of l0 1pft0 Ir lN[u.ft,w LixMhL, 04f0 /LU,tf ft, fqf rxcmtt*., CO X4[ hro' JLtVfT fNt Y �. 1_L LMp((AIN SING! __I�N•. 1l lyww St. fMIf8.1.1 1ro N ✓t1 TRACT Aw glop 10 I v /a ,•fI ! 1 I I it Ir ,1 t•ff a,•r' ' ' ,L:w ' it it 1 .( , •, 8 v n Y �,L �t e I : g�CY fir. � y '' � � •7 � '_ i� �� °Dx-�' � I� �Jr�T .�f'. In I�1, � • ` i / ' O•Y � OI`{,%i111 � � .fyf1 •/ll 4 3 �t w 'k•p )/ ��lll; 9•,'A. �• >. f ./ hLn: :�k ;A� •. 't is Y )Iri •t'^f/' 1 J 'IL•> gPNNf iii �`ii i�i }�-t •.ialNY IvW— 46 1j to I it f /�A /�It 9K • • Opp y+ • h0�. ij• MIIIfY IYq All � I C ,lwrA •'' n 'y.1/w.I 1}Rtl•r. N YI�— tl t • I r.., -,..Wt • 1 I hnT/ t N�YrI.. • I 1 )e 8 •N.y ! I u y /r ' No of �1•i %.:',.� :4 .����I ? ip �� •'1......l= i4 , ` ; is „N,n1•` --a'r-- -•tiLG � ' g -alp -` -m-- _�_ : •• � I ' �9-, _.�_ ..�.- ♦♦ I.•Y . .. aV } m,�l• �a %., I .i %�EIY� Iroro ,tltl O G -- uw LA faM STREET ., � j it �p�Nt39r°'f �f- -mil- �n-'I -� -: tp}IF '•7 - 'C'D-�_•@_,• _�_ �_ `tl III it w •S / ;e 1 4e t p . 4 t Yt f •N ! / .4 f x /o �e k I' e • y /Kl � �F� I • w , I. • f. Y MM NT I ( 4tl -1� Y, - ,-w•� -.•, IINNI.Nt11I, •II'lI N'fNtlN /IM _� haU: C'..t C,,. IM, _ -_evil IAA - \q %NV v I U /oro vroro• )/I/' nfq 11 ro' fIR /Y 1)lt' MfJ qro' IrM n/• I/Y Pf! •fro• Ern n• uw r!) II fO IY/I f/' ft 4, nf/ I U 1 M. M 11j= Locatrd r so southeast corner of Basetin•ul 21 '�a„� -YES Raeono Avg OWNER: Thompson Associates Development Company P 0 Box 338 Carlsbad, California 92008 Performance Bond (Road) $152,000 o L.' NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in in accordance with the goad improvement plans and y it is racer nded that the roads be accepted The , e '1 improvements include curb and gutter, paving, walls and street signs �„ — ••' 5 SR �`I �1;jj^s �.v •,.�. —o!q` ,�a a. v.ru- ♦ •w. i� � t 40� fi\ -t 1:` ' R • R w R !w : P 11 'P 1 'L a ; L p fi ! -l1 �Fi�' •R �y °$ a '.? ° e�= ° ZR � i`Et r �T. �(i R, ...l �1 z Q� _ I WO It y) %i ;tt :it . -' 1 I 2� %I • .. ..,� at VCd( ,„Tf tr'.r G 1; �4 . = At 0' < a ' i o2�Sa?)L �` U Z pKi Yi a ... y d� K � �xgxgj q i1 y1 9 � T•1� lii� Fy. e lly>ii: IB 1• LT ``\\ • ant I .. 1 �. ^ _':.� r�l�.'f7/.�� ; -' �, �.::: � � h ll.� I i p�a. — .a —AVw R!J..iT.i Xr:IL •' r iE' I`f• _S `K i yt It 9t et I R 4 08 tt t- areaM.�..•yac_ men .veae ;: s 1 r-, i i C4 �. JL�_ ^�L '->•_ mom:.---- :�,a: ---1- L• Y r.- ° ?i:.: + :3/1N3AV_t�NOWV2J r � ' - -- � � • I d -- - i y•'f 1, `'I� s i 4 a 7 J�n,nrl t t ASV I 'f' 3)� IN 1,16- C.OI TY OF SAN DGFINARDI Located on the nnrtheast corner of haven and 19th Street. OWNER! Thompson Associates Development Corporation r••au P 0 Box 338 Carlsbad, California 92008 Landscapirg and Block Wall $74.894 88 NOM On May 9, 1978, the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors authorized the release of all bonds for the subject tracts to Thompson Associates Development Company This action vas taken due to the sale of the tracts to 1w19 Homes of California and the receipt of replacement bonds. •wM �y_i . F•n I - J 4 -..- n • t 4q. -1I -ur } rvr 1 i ,•�x� ^• SURVEY LY'TA /CS , The County leis been holding •a landsraping bond for these tracts in the Planning Files. Levin Homea acquired a replacement bond for these lnprovements on June 15, 1978. We have received a request to release the duplicate bond in the name of Thompson Associates A search of our records indicate tlhnt this is the first request for the release of this bond Further, the in- formation transmitted to us did not shoe the Lewis bond existed He now have documents verifying the Lewis bond for land- scaping is active. He recommend that since the Lewis bond is active that the Thompson bond should be released. • ,•�x� _ I YI µ ; � .rrsm� .e n ^• SURVEY LY'TA /CS , The County leis been holding •a landsraping bond for these tracts in the Planning Files. Levin Homea acquired a replacement bond for these lnprovements on June 15, 1978. We have received a request to release the duplicate bond in the name of Thompson Associates A search of our records indicate tlhnt this is the first request for the release of this bond Further, the in- formation transmitted to us did not shoe the Lewis bond existed He now have documents verifying the Lewis bond for land- scaping is active. He recommend that since the Lewis bond is active that the Thompson bond should be released. • 0 e ORDINANCE N0. i,,I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO 207- 031 -19 FROM FP -2 TO A -P ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BASELINE APPROXMATELY 800' EAST OF CARNELIAN STREET. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAJJONCA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: a That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held In the time and marner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and has duly heard and considered said recommendation b. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga present and proposed. c That this rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact and a Negative Declaration was issued by the Planning Commission on January 10, 1979 SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned In the canner state, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly FP -2 (Flood Plain) to AP (administrative professional) Said property in located on the south side of Baseline, approximately 800' cast of Carnelian known as Assessor Parcel 207 - 031 -19. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this -lay of February, 1979. ATTEST: City Clark 1 Hayor 22 ORDINANCE NO. 63 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE KEEPING, OF DOGS AS PETS WITHIN THE CITY. SECTION 1. For the purposes of this article, unless otherwise apparent from the context, certain words and phrases used in this article are •:fined as follows: A. "Commercial kennel" shall mean any place, other than a private kennel, where four (4) or more dogs over four (4) mor:ths of age are kept. b "Enforcing Officer" shall mean the City Manager, the Police Chief, the Humane office, the City Health officer, or such other person as the Council may designate. - SECTION 2. Vaccination and licenses: Required. Each dog over the age of four (4) months harbored within the City shall be vaccinated for rabies and licensed. The owner or harborer of such dog shall be required to present to the Enforcing Officer, upon request, a valid license and vaccination certificate signed by a licensed veterinarian. Such vaccination shall be made each year unless a chick - embryo vaccine approved by the Department of Publtc Health of the State has been given by a licensed veterinarian within two (2) years. SECTION 3. Licenses: Places of procurement. i Licenses shall be available at the License Bureau in the t City Hall and at the Dog Pound. } SECTION 4 Licenses: Fees: Penalties. a. Dog license fee are hereby set by resolution. SECTION 5. Licenses: Applications: Issuance: Form Upon the receipt of the required license fee accompanied by an application in writing giving the name and address of the owner or possessor of the dog and a brief description of the dog, the Enforcing Officer shall issue and deliver to such person a license certifying the payment of such fee and setting forth the name and address of the application, a brief description of the dog, and the number allotted to such dog. 23 • 0 SECTION 6. Tags: Izsuance. At the time of the issuance of a dog license, the Enforc- ing Officer shall deliver te, the applicant for such license a metal tag which shall set forth the date of expiration of the license. SECTION 7. Tags: Maintenance on dogs. It shall be the duty of the owner or harborer of the dog for which a tag is issued, to maintain such tag on such dog. SECTION S. Leashes. No person owning or harboring any dog within the City shall permit such dog, whether licensed or not, to be upon any public street, sidewalk, lane, alley, court, or any other public place or upon any private property or premises, other than those of the person owning or having control or custody of such dog, except when such dog is held under by an able- bodied and competent person. the City. SECTION 9. Vicious dogs. No person shall harbor or keep any vicious dog within SECTION 10. Rabies examinations a. Biting dogs: Quarantine. whenever it is shown that any dog has bitte„ any pers m, the owner or person having the custody or posees3on of such dog shall, upon th order of the city Health Officer or his authorized agent, quarantine the dog and keep it securely chained for a period of ten (10) days, and shall Permit the ity Health Officer or his representative to make an inspection e, examination of such dog at any time during such period. QLarantined dogs shall not be removed from the premises without the permission of the City Health Officer. The City Health Officer, in the interest of protecting the person bitten, may order the dog quarantined for a period of twelve (12) days at the owner's expense at the City Pound or at a licensed veterinary hospital. b Dogs having or suspected of having rabies. The En- forcing Officer or any of his deputies shall have the right to seize any dog within the City having or suspected of having rabies and cause the same to be examined by the City Health Officer, and it shell be the duty of the City Hea`:.h Officer to examine the dog for the purpose of determining if such dog is afflicted with rabies. c Release of rabies -free dogs. If it shall be determined that such dog does not have rabies, it shall be returned to the owner or person harboring the dog. 2 24 • 0 SECTION 11. Impoundment. a. Unlicensed dogs and dogs at large. it shall be the duty of the Enforcing Officer to impound any dog for which a license is required if such dog shall not be wearing the dog license tag provided for in this article or any dog running loose upon a public street, side walk, lane all..y, court, or other public place or upon any private property or premises, other than those of the person owning cr having control or custody of such dog, and the Enforcing Officer shall keep the dog impounded until claimed, de- stroyed, or otherwise disposed o£. b. Release to owners: Fees. The owner or possessor of the dog so impounded may reclaim ouch dog upon the payment of the required license fee and Ten and no /100ths ($10.00) dollars pickup fee for the first offense. Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) Dollars pickup fee for the second offens„ within six (6) months of the prior offense, Fifteen and no /100ths ($15.00) dollars pickup fee for the third offense within six (6) mo:iths of the second offense plus bonding fees in the amount of Two and no /100ths ($2.00) dollars for the first day and for each additional day the dog is impounded. c. Adoption: Disposal. If a dog shall have been impounded for a period of three (3) days and shall not have been reclaimed by the owner, the Enforcing Officer may, in lieu of killing such dog, offer the dog for adoption. The Enforcing Officer may, however, with the approval of a licensed veterinarian or Humane Officer of the State, humanely destroy any impounded animal on the same day it is impounded if the animal is in great pain or discomfort due to an injury or infectious disease which may contaminate and be detrimental to the health of the other animals at the animal shelter. d. Destruction. If an impounded dog is not claimed at the expirati.n of such three (3) day period, it shall be the duty of the Enforcing Officer to cause such dog to be destroyed if not otherwise disposed of. In such event, such dog may be held for an additional time not to exceed ten (10) days. SECTION 12. Commercial kennels: Licenses: Required: Fees. Every person engaging in the business of operating a commercial kennel as defined in subsection (a) of Section 1 of this article, shall obtain a license from the License Official and shall pay an annual license fee for each calendar year, or part of such calendar year. 25 u SECTION 13. Commercial kennels: Licenses: Revocation. The License Official shall have the power, upon giving ten (10) days' notice by United State Mail to any comercial kennel licensee, to revoke any license granted to such commercial kennel operator for violations of the provisions of this article. ADOPTED AND APPROVED TIIIS day of , 1979. Ayes: Noes: City Clerk of Ranc o Cucamonga Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga 4 -2b • ORDINANCE NO. ( t • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA ESTABLISHING A SYSTEKS DEVEWFHENr FEE ON NEW DEVELOFHEltr IN THE CITY. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: There is hereby Imposed by this ordinance a fee to provide a predictable and equitable funding source for capital improvements by requiring those developing property to -buy into^ the pre - existing City infrastructure so that the impact of new growth on existing improvements will be borne equitably by new development. SECTION 7• Fee Schedule. The Systems Development Fee schedule and corresponding meth,5 of fee payment shall be In conformance with and equal to an amount as set by Resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3: payment of Fee. Any applicant for building permit for a new development shall pay the Systems Development Fee In conjunction with psymsnt of the building permit fee. SECTION 4: Exemptions. Any parcel of laud which, on the date of application fors building permit, meets the following criteria shall be exempt from paying a Systems Development Fee: a. Alterations which do not increase the floor area of a structure; b. Additions to single family residential dwellings which do not constitute the addition of a living unit as defined by the building code; SECTION 5: Segregation and Use of kevenues. All funds derived from the Systems Development Fee are to be segregated by accounting practices fr.x4 811 other funds of the City and shall be wed for no other purposes than the construction and expansion of City streets and highway capital impravements to provide additional capacity and /or safety capabilities required because of new development. Up to twenty -five (252) of these funds may be expended for the purposed of planning and engineering design acd sdninistrative services of such capital Improvements Initial fun's collected under this Ordinance may be utilized to conduct Systems Flaming studies designated by the City Council by Resolution. Designation of expenditure of funds available from the Systems Dovelop- ment Fee shall be made by the City Council. Foods nay be accumulated for expect- ed future expansion costs. SECTION 6: Severability. If any section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in the Ordinance, or any part thereof, L for any reason held to be Invalid or umcowtltutiowl, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this 2rdinance irrespective of as fact C-t any one or more sections, sub- sections, sub- dlvislow, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be de- clared Invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign. this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in T1to Daily Report, a newspaper of general circula[i�n, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of _ 1979. AYES: NOES: r -- ABSENT Rayne of the City of Psycho Cucamonga i C ATTEST: City Clerk r; t a R 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 7 - I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANLYO CUCAMONGA SETTING A SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FEE IN ACCCRDANCE WITH ORDINANCE ,II OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby does resolve as follows: HdEAEAS, Ordinance No. 1� of the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides for the collection of a Systemr Development Fee to provide a predictable and equitable funding source for capital improvements by requiring new development to 'buy into" Lhe pre - existing City Infrastructure so that the impact )f new growth on existing improvements will be borne by new development; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. (e I requires that e❖cry Applicant for a building perms[ shall pay a Systems Developm..It Fee equnl to an amount set by Resolution by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Citv of Rancho Cucmonea nets a System Development Fee equal to one percent (lt) of the estimated building Permit valuation of a building and that payment of the Systems Development fee shall be made concurrently with the payment of any and all building permit fees levied on construction of said building. ALSO. BE IT RESOLVED that funds collected under this fee may be utilized for the following studies: ATTEST: Preparrtion of subarea traffieways studies to establish specific street standards Precise aligm+ent plane for major and secondary thoroughfares Specific Urban Design Plans for Special Boulevards. Establishment of City improvement standards and specifications. Multimodal Transportation Element Studies. PASSED, APPROVED AHD ADOPTED THIS day of City Clerk Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga i 1 6 ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 53 AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 53 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read as follows: "SECTION 6: Exceptions: (a) Drainage fees shall not be rsquired as a condition of the issuance of a building permit for alterations, repairs, or remodeling of any building where the cost of such alterations, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at less than $10,000.00. (b) The collection of drainage fees with respect to vacant parcels created -by a parcel map or the waiver of a parcel map shall be deferred until such time as a building permit is issued for construction on said parcel or parcels " SECTION 2: Urgency. This ordinance is hereby % .clared an urgency measure, necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, safety, health and welfare of persons and property within the City of Rancho O:^_amonga for the reasons stated in Ordinance No. 53. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. SECTION 3: Severability. If any section, sub - section, sub- division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this ordinance, or any-part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub - sections, sub - divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign thia Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dail Ae or t, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the�ty of Ontar o, California, and circulated in;the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of ., 1979. AYES: G NOES • / [� 3TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1979 TO: City Council and C! y Manger FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Amendment to Ordinance 53 — Storm Drain Fee Implementation of the Storm Draio Fee Ordinance has brought out a problem which staff feels presents an undue burden on property owners seeking minor subdivi- sions through the Parcel Map procedure. The ordinance, as written, requires payment of the storm drain fee as a condition of recordation f a parcel map or waiver of parcel sup. This can amount to large sums for large industrial _ parcels and for small developers of single homes on 5 acre parcels. For this reason, the Engineering Division and City Attorney have prepared Ordinance 65 to amend Ordinance 53 and has revised Ordinance 60 to allow waiver of £ets on a parcel map it waiver of parcel map on vacant parcels within a parcel map. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Ordinance 65 be adopted to amend Ordinance 53 Reui•ectfully au itted, V,4 e.bbs Cit er IH:ec W ORDINANCE NO. (r L- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISS)MENT OF A DRAINAGE PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Statement of Intent and Purpose. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is seriously af- fected by surface and storm waters and the continual subdivis- ion and development of property within the City has placed a serious demand on existing facilities which handle surface and storm waters. In order to plan and develop drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters and to provide an equitable manner for the apportionment of the cost of the de- velopment of such facilities, the City Council does determine that a drainage plan must be adopted and a drainage fee estab- lished to provide funds to be used for the construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan. SECTION 2: Drainaqo Plan and Local Arca. The comprehensive storm drain plans numbers 1 and 2, the index thereto and the appropriate plan sheets for the area lying within the City limits of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, together with construction costs and oth,, related mater- ial, which comprehensive storm drain plans were prepared by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, are hereby found and declared to be the drainage plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Council finds that drainage problems are approximately of equal magnitude in all areas of the City, and declares that for the purposes of this Ordinance, all areas of the City shall con - stituto one local drainage area. SECTION 3: Payment of Fees. As a condition of approval of a final map, a parer) map, the waiver of a parcel map, or the issuance of a build- ing permit, the City shall require the payment of a fee as is here- after provided for the purposes of defraying the actual or esti- mated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the re- moval of surface and storm waters from the local drainage area. The City Council finds that development of property within the local drainage area will require construction of the facilities described in the drainage plan, and that the fees are fairly ap- portioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the property in the local drainage area and on the need for such facilities ere - ated by the proposed division or development of property in the -)- local drainage area.. The City Council further finds that the fee as to any property does not exceed the pro rata share of the amount of the total actual or estimated cost of all facilities pursuant to the drainage plan which would be assessable on any parcel of property if such costs were apportioned on a per acre basis. SE^ -TIMI is Amount of Fee, The fee required to be paid by this Ordinance is $25.00 per 1 /100th of an acre or fraction thereof. SECTION 5: Deposit and Utilization of Fee. The fee required to be paid by thin Ordinance shall be deposited in a "planned drainage facilities fund" and shall be expended solely for the construction or reimbursement for the construction of drainage facilities pursuant to the drain- age plan or to reimburse the City for the costs of engineering and administrative services to establish, design and construct the plan and facilities up to 258. Initial funds collected may be utilized for specific planning and engineering studies as des- ignated by resolution of the City Council. "SECTION 6: Exceptions. (a) Drainage fees shall not be required as a condition of the issuance of a building permit for alterations, repairs, or remodeling of any building where the cost of such alterations, repairs, or remodeling is estimated at less than $10,000.00 (b) The collec'4nn of drainage fees with reapect to vacant parcels created v n parcel map or the waiver of i parcel map shall be deferred ut.tal such time as a building pern it is issued for construction on said parcel or parcels." SECTION 7: Single Drainage Fee payment. No parcel of land shall be subject to payment of a drainage fee ncre than once. If any portion of a parcel has previounly paid a drainage fee, credit shall be given for such prior pa•>ment and a proper apportionment made as a credLt toward any foe payment required by this Ordinance. SECTION 8: Severability. If any section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase in this Ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconsti- tutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the re- maining sections or portions of this Ordinance or any part there- of. The City Council .ereby declares that it would have Massed -2- 31 each section, sub - section, sub - division, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- sections, sub- divisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases may be declared invalid or uncon- stitutional. SLCTZON 9: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Cler s a attest to the same, and the city rtnrk ehall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper_ of general circulation, published n e C ty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California 1979. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _day of , • AYES: r NOES: ABSENT: i ATTEST: City Clerk ayor o t e city f Rancho Cucamonga 3cZ,, 0 28 February 1979 City Council City ofRancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Honorable Council Members: AROOK5 COMPRNV The purpose of this letter is to request a waiver of the storm drainage fees, enacted by the City Council at Its meeting on Wednesday, February 21, 1979 If the City Council Is unable to grant such a request witnout a hearing therebri then we hereby respectfully request that our petition for a waiver of these fees be placed on the agenda for the City Council meeting scheduled to take place March 7, 1979 A representative of our company will attend the meeting to present o.r position and to answer whatever questions the City Council might have. Below we have set out a brief statement of the factual background in support of our request for a waiver of the fees ferlwed by a delineation of the reasons therefor FACTUIL BACKGROUND. In December of 1978, we filed applications with the Office of Community Develop- ment for building permits in connection with the construction of a general purpose "Butler Building" on our property located at 10220 Fourth Street. here In the City of Rancho Cucamonga (The estimated cost of the building will be about $52,000 ) At that time we were colt it would take about two to three weeks to approve the application We received no response from the Development Office until January 29. 1979, at which time we were Informed that final approval of the permit application could not be given because the City had not yet decided on what Its landscaping requirements would be. On February 2, 1979, we were Informed that the permit applications could not be processed until a newly enacted $25 application fee was paid We Immediately paid said fee CITYrOFR NCI;OCUCA ONGA ADMINISTRATION IAAR 1 1979 AM Pu F� 7�8101pi1)112111213141u18 U POLY PL RSTIC PRODUCTS 1022C FOURTH STREET, CUCRMONCRs CRLIFORNIR 91130 City Council • 28 February 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga PAGE 2 On February 6 or 7 of this year, a representative from our company met with Barry K. Hogan from the Community Development Office to discuss our permit applications Thereafter we received a letter from Mr Hogan dated February 13, setting forth the various conditions upon which the City would grant building permits. A copy of the letter Is attached hereto. In neither the letter nor In our diccussions with Mr. Hagan was it indicated to us that In addition to the corditions for the Issuance of building permits set teeth in the letter, tnere would be the further condition thagt we would nave to pay $2,500 per acre as a drainage fee There was no notification whatsoever that any such fee was even being considered. After we received Mr. Hogan's letter, we reviewed the provisions contained therein and carefully considered the expense which Would be Incurred to comply with the conditions Shortly thereafter, we determined that we were willing to comply with said conditions and accordingly we Informed our contractor to proceed to obtain the permits Unfortunately, the man assigned by our contractor to be In charge of this project became III and was admitted to the hospital for a few days After he was released, he Immediately attempted to obtain the permits from the Community Development Office. At that time he was informed that on the preceding evening the City Council had passed an emergency measure effective immedlately assessing drainage fees on all future development and that sold fees were to be collected before building permits could be Issued He was further Informed that, because our property contained approximately 7 16 acres, the f,.es would be about $18,000 As you can see, the mere fortuity that our contractor attempted to obtain the permits on Thursday Instead of Wednesday, raised the price of our building from $52,000 to $70,000 REASONS FOR WAIVER REQ11EST We believe that our request for a waiver of the drainage fees in this particular Instance Is strongly supported by the following reasons I. Had we known that It would have made a difference of $18,000 whether we picked up our permits on Wednesday as opposed to Thursday, obviously, we Would have made every effort to obtain the permits on Wednesday At no time, was the possibility of any such fee raised In our corrversations The passage of such ae ordinance which was made effective Immediately and of which no notice was given whatsoever is contrary to the basic notions of democratic government It deprived us of our right to notice of a material change In the law and to conform our actions accordingly It also makes It Impossible for companies like ou :s to plan for the future If the consequences of our actions may be changed drastically and without notice by city government. 2 Although building permit standards may be revised after granting the permits but prior to construction that is not the same as the assessment of fees and taxes without notice on actions which have already been contemplated and for which permits have already been filed; especially, when we could have easily avoided the Imposition of such fees and taxes If we had been Informed of 3� City Council • • 28 February 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga PAGE 3 the contemplated ordinance. The passage of the emergency drainage fees measure without a grace period for permit applications alrer ".y on file, but not cbtalned, may be Illegal. At the very least, the drainage fees measure as It had been applied to our project certainly does not comport with the notions of fairness expressed in the statute quoted below. Although It Is not directly applicable to building permit applications, California Government Code Section 66483, dealing with the Imposition of drainage fees prior to the g•anting of subdivision permits, contains a fair method for notification of assessments for drainage fee:. It prcvaw_cc --c fellow:: 'There may be imposed by local ordinance a requirement for the payment of fees for purposes of defraying the actual or estimated cost of constructing planned drainage facilities for the removal of surface and storm waters from local or neighborhood drainage areas and of constructing planned sanitary sewer areas, subject to the Fall wing conditions: (a) The ordinance has been In effect for a period of at least 30 days prior to the filing of the tentative map or parcaT map If no tentative map Is required " (emphasis added) 3. Due to organizational problems In your Development Office (which are to be expected during the formative period of a new city government) and the unfortunate Illness of our contractor resulting In the delay In obtaining the permits, the price of our $52,000 building ballooned to $10.000 without any notice or opportunity to be heard. This Increase In costs was due to completely fortuitous events bearing no relationship to the actual construction which was to take place•Again, at no time was It communicated to us that we should proceed as rapidly as possible to obtain the permits because a drainage fee was contemplateJ In all probability. we will not be In a position to construct the building at this additional tort even though It would be beneficial to the efficient operation of our facility 4. Finally, the fee, which as we understand it is based on the entire acreage of our property, bears no relationship to the actual acreage upon which the construction will take place It Is our understanding that the only way to obtain the building permits necessary for the construction of our building without payment of the drainage fees is to obtain a prior waiver of said fees fra• the City Council It is based on this understanding that we have written you this letter. As you are aware, i 0 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 February 1973 PAGE 4 time is extremely critical with respect to all construction projects and thus, It Is +ery Important that our request be heard as soon as possible. We are looking forward to our appearance before the City Council to discuss the matters contained herein. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Very truly yours Poly Plastic Products, A Brooks Company A �� ( F M Brooks, JrPresident y .J FMBjr:raf Etc I. 0 • CITY DP MOM CCGCfr:.A M NORARDLM DATE: March 7, 1979 TO: City Manager and City Council FROM. Jack laa, Director of Comunlry Development SUBJECT: ZORIDC ORDIOA= AM ZSDV E.f rO 79-02 - AwadinZ, the Bane Occupation Sections of the Zoning Ordfm a by repealing Section 61.024A(b)(3) and adding Section 61.0219(s)(a) and aneding the defiultion of bone occupation in Section 61.022 A hone occupation is typically an accessory use that cay be permitted in a home if such use meets certain criteria or conditions. Such conditions are - typically iaposed upon Mug occupations to ensure that the use will ont be detrimental to surrounding hoes or property. One of the tutor reasons for regulation of home occupations is to ensure that the use is clearly incidental and subordinate to the primary use of the structure as a dwelling. The existing Mee occupation provisions vithin the Toning Ordinance do not contain review and approval procedures or conditions for proper regulation. In order to protect tesidential areas hoe inrnapatible accessory uses, strict regulations are needed and the present provisions do nt accosplish this goal. Therefore, the Planning Corcisslon at its meeting nr January 24, 1979, adopted Resolution Do. 79-M which reemarads that the City Council aecud the 7aning Ordinance as show on the attached Resolution (Ex. 'A'). Basically, the proposed regulations require review and approval by the Director of Co=cunity Development based upon the conditions listed In the provisions. This axndaxent accocplishess three changes relative to hom! occupations: 1) repeals the existing provisions in its entirety, 2) redefines boor occupation, and 3) establishes new regulations within the General Provisions section of the Zoning Ordinance. Attached is the ea:vironsental analysis of this gym[ (Ex '50). Such analysis did not reveal any signlficaut adverse tapacts as a result of this project. Therefore, the Planning Coeiiss(ou recomends Issuance of a Negative Declaration. RECM�MeOATIM.' The Planning Co Issloa reeaosesds, after the public hearing, that thr City C orfl adopt the attached ordinance for anending the hone occupation provisions. �sPecCrpl1ot -I'iM, Jack Ion, Director of Comvnity Developnent JL:yV:cc 37 • • RESOLUTION NO. 79.04 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO LUCAIORGA PLANNING COIPMISSION RECUK4ENDINC APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDlt4%KE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -02 NNICH REPEALS SECTIONS 61 024A(b)(3). AMENDS SECTION 61.022 AND ADDS SECTION 61.0219(0)(9). "EREAS, on the 240h Zay of January, 1919, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: I. That such mendmm,t is to conformance with the Intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance 2 that such amendment is consistent with the goals _ and pollcles of the General Plan. 3. That such amendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare 4. That the proposed amendment would not have signi- ficant adverse environmental impacts SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this proJect will not create a significant adverse Impact on the environ- ment and has recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 24, 1979 NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: ` 1. That pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the Cali- . fornia Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends ? approval on the 24th day of January, 1979, of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No.79 -02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Ordinance Anend- eent No 79 -02 which repeals Section 61 024A(b)(3). amends Section 61.022 and adds Section 61.0219(a)(9). 3 That a Certified Copy or this Resolution and related mat crinl hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. That the attached amended Sections of the Zoning Ordinance becomes a part of this Resolution. ERHIBII A 3g • 0 APPROVED AND ADJPTED THIS 24711 DAY OF JANUARY, 1979 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I. JACK LAH, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cent Nfy that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pasiod, and adopted by the Planning Co Ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of January, 1979. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GARCIA, JONES, DIJD., TOISfOY, REHPEL. NOES: COMISSIONERS: NONE ARSENrt CQMISSIONERS: NONE "" 61.0219(a)(9) - NQ1E OCCUPATION PERMITS A. Nome occupations, as defined in Section 61.022, my be permitted on any property used for residential purposes upon approval of the Director of Community Development based on the following ccnditions: 1. The use of the dwelling for such home occupation Shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by Ito inhabitnnts. 2. No persons, other Chan members of the family who reside on the premises, shall be engaged in such activity. 3. There shall be to change in the outward appea•nnce of th building or premises, or other visible evidence of the activity. 4 there shall be no sales of products on the premises. 5. The use shall not allow customers or cllenteie to visit dwellings. However, incidental uers such as music lessons, may be permitted - If the Intensity of such instruction Is approved by the Director of Community Development. 6. No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates noise, smoke, glare, fumes, '_or, vibration, electrical, radio or television interference disruptive to surrounding properties. 7. No home occupation shall be conducted in so accessory building. Nor- mal use of the garage may be pemttted if such use does not obstruct required parking. 8 Not more than 15% of the total square footage of the dwelling or one room of the dwelling, which ever is leas, shall be used for the home occupation. 9. The we shall not involve storage of rterials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any structures. 10. Uso of the United States Postal Service in conjunction with the home w_cupntlon shall be done by means of a post office box 11. 110 signs shall be displayed in eoniunetion with the home occupation and there shall be no advertising wing the home address. 12. A home occupnUun permit is not valid until a current City business license is obtained. 13. The use Anil not Involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other than a vehicle not to exceed n capacity of 3/4 ton, owned by the operator of such, home occupation which shall be stored in an entirely enclosed garage. 14 If an applicant is not the owner of the property where a home occupa- tion Is to he conducted, then a signed statement frou the owner approving such une of the duelling must be submitted with the appli- cation. WE B. Procedure for Approval: Upon acceptance of a home occupation application and fee, as specified in the Fee Resolution, the Director of Community Development or his designated representative shall review the request for compliance with the above conditions Within 5 days from the submittal of the applica- tion, staff shell post a Notice of Request for s dome Occupation Permit on the subject property and send a copy of the request to all adjacent property Owners for public review and input. Following a ten (10) day review period, tie Directur of Community Development shall render a decision. The dec181on shall clearly state reasons for approval or denial based upon the above findings. The decision of the Director shill be final unless appealed to the Planning Commis s ion within ten (10) days from his decision. Upon receiving approval from the Director of Com- malty Development or his delegate for a home occupation, the applicant shall immediately make application for a City Business License. City business licensze expire on a yearly basis. If the business license is not renewed within 30 days after expiration, then the home occupation- perait shall become null and void C. Appeal Procedure: Any applicant for a home occupation permit or any person aggrieved by the decision of the Director of Community Development to approve or deny a request for a have occupation permit shill love 10 days from the date of the decision to appeal in writing the decision to the Planning Commission. Said appeal shall Indicate wherein the decision of the Director was at variance with the required findings as stated in this Section. Any person subsequently aggrieved by a decision of the Planning Commission relating to the home occupation permit ma:- appeal sold decision In writing to the City Council as provided for above 41 61.022 An accessory occupational use conducted by a resident of a duelling as a secondary ore thereof, which is conducted entirely within a dwelling by the inhabitants thereof, which use is clearly incidental to the use of th:e structure for dwelling purposes and which does not change the character thereof, and for which there Is no display, :o stock -in- trade, no commodity said on the premises and no mechanical equipment used except that neceseacy for housekeeping purposes and which use meets the following conditions: 1 Tile use of the dwelling for such home occupation shall be clearly incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by Its inhabitance. 2 No persons other than members of the family who reside on the premises, shall be engaged in such activity. 3. There shall be no change in the cutuard appearance of the building or, pre- mises, or other visible evidence of the activity. 4 There shall be no sales of products on the premises. 5. The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit dwellings. Now- ever, incidental uses such as music lessons, may be permitted if the intensity of such instructions Is approved by the Director o{ Community Development. 6 No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property which creates nine, smoke, glare, fumed, -dor, vibration, electrical, radio or television Interference diampth, to surrounding properties 7 No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory building. Nor - mcl use of the garage lady be permitted if such use does not obstruct required parking. 8 Not more than 15% of the total square footage for the dwelling shall be used for the homy occupation. 9 The use shall not involve storage of materials or supplies In an accessory building or outside any structures. 10. Use of the United States Postal Service to conjunction with the lime occupation shall be done by means of a post office box. 11 No signs shall he displayed In conjunction with the hire occupation and there shall be no ndvertising using the home address. 12. A home occupation permit is not valid until a current City business license Is obtained 13. The use shall net Involve the use of commercial vehicles for delivery of materials to or from the premises, other than a vehicle not to exceed a capacity of 3/4 ton, owned by the operator of such home occupation which shall be stored in an entirely enclosed garage �� 61.022 (Continued) 16 If an applicant is no[ the owner of the property where a home occupation is to be conducted, then a signed statement .rom the owner approving oath use of the dwelling must be submitted with the applicntfon. 3 CITY OF RANCIIO CUCNIONCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT ItIFORlfATTON SHEET - To be completed by applican Environmental AOseasMOnt Rev;,ew Fees $70.00,•,do i r For all projects requiring environmental review; thie'j form must be Completed and submitted to the Devetohis' , :Review Committee through the department whero�thofi+1i M PROJECT DCSCRIPTION IPTIUN OF PROJECT, IiM,Ae4—. aL. II_._ .._. t • sT ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE r �I ,PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY, TALE OF,EXISTING',AND tf� DCSCRIPE THE ENMONME -MAT, II SICI'TTNG OF TIM. PROJECTI SITE }� INC�DING INFOMINTION ON TOPOGRAP Y, PLNNTS (TREES), ANIMAI,S. ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEIIIC ASPECTS. , -USE OF SURROUNI,ING PIXIPERTIES, AND TIIC DI'SenTpTION OF ANY EXISTING STRIICTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) AI �� n I p 13 cne Project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of Cumulative actions, which nithoug), individually small. may as a wholes ,.�..., ..: wIJl 7•I!I.11: JJ t•CT: YIDS NO , •1- 1. Create a substantial chan3o in ground contours? t 2., Create a substantial change in ,existing �� noise or vibration? ._..,(_ 3. create n substantial change in demand f, municipal services (police, fira,•,water, rsa(waga, etc.)'; .,.. r • d, •r 4- Create changer in the sxisting aoning�o: ,general ' plan designations] ypp3.: -45,4' � ttN ':• 'ra.• ,...L 5: "move any existing trees? ;How many?_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammablas or exolosi G " "'• i Explanation of any YES answers above: I MtORT1117fr If the project involves the "n K construction of, residential units, complete the form on the next page. ., 4? 't; CF.RTIFICATJnN: I hereby certify thnt the statements furnisl above and in the attached exhibits present the data and (I information required for this initial evaluation to bile , ,4f f! best or my ability, and that Lhc fact r., ntatcmente, and -' information 4,. presented are true and ' correct to the best of,rlti, my knowledge and belief. I further understand that ;��bt1i `' ndditional in Cormatinn may he required =� to he submitted �- before an adequate evaulation can be made by the,sayolapawnt Review Committee. Date n Title fic C�a.,,nr✓' � :. $b} •N• ia,,{ t1 "� 1��'V 6'.4', J' "_: {. , rKS Z 3,,,i `; ') -i. 1! ��1 tiiljl4 "L"bi .'.w3if1137b{"k► 4 ;.1.' '+�+h ✓: ,a' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIP.ONtIEITAL CHECKLIST 1 iik•. •i f lbw -a DATE: 14AA In Ia 1 • t'`v1. L'+s�t�'s.. APPLICANTt - t: %- �i.••Lir aV.GA n�pt.,Imtcva I'•ra•:,;; 4.1 ADDRESS: '•1 �� >•_� ". 'v •+� ' PIIONC NUNDER:__ � , �j% ,1 -•'I FILING DATE: - `,};•. "•) —��LOC NUNDCR z n F( j�•7r{ -pyi • ' ' • PROJECT:�� n Q"�i,•Mf 7n PROJECT LOCATION: I. CUVIRONMENTAI. IMPACTS (Explanal)ons of all "yes" and "maybe" annwilrs required on attached shccta ) are 1. Soils and renlogy. Will the YCS Mm NO the proposal result in: jt a• Unstable ground conditions or in > rhan,lon in geologic • 1 1 , I ' X1�' b. Oistruptions, di SalaCC111etILa, �� 1 •„ ac compaction nr burial or the soil?_ C; Changc in topography or qt ound ' •'I surface contour intervals? �'• •;.:fir d. The destruct Son, coverino _ -- `•�ft or ' "dif lead nn of any onttitle 1 geologic or physical Centures? ' e• Any potential incrrnne in wind of r,•., •. ,'i� , %�;J� watrl nt Oslon of soils, nffertinq oWier { on or off site conditions? - ; iee.. rT.1�"sr��;:�tr•�•r.. �• �:; �9�,'��..;�t+���>�'�4•Wrt•�`• 1'3l;e z YES MAYBE H6 f. Chan•es in erosion siltation, s +y or deposition?I y��y'• . g. Exposure of people or property 1.;� : to geulogic hazards such as :.�,',� i� 0 earthquakes, landslides, mud- ••;t;j`•'(�? 5'r•, nl Ides, around failure, or '':`+• dsr,.�)E+•x• similar hazards? r � .•: h. •'� An increase in the rate of ,, 1i, f'" •,t.M extraction and /or use of r any �., t•;; I�''P.minernl resource? "+ ;' ? " %j• r" 2. Ilydroloay will the proposal result ins •t'. a, Chanties in currents, or Lite crntrse or direction of flowing streams, _ •� rivers, or,cphcmeral .�;t '•i� r : stream channels? {.4F¢ b Chanties in Absorption rates, i t' dracna.)e paLterns, or the y, rate and amount of surface c•I� water runoff? .3 V• _ M41; c. Al Lerntionn to the course or f�} flow of flood waters? 4',.•1 d Chanuc in tha amount of nur- _ u face water in any body of water? / .a nisrharge into surface waters,) •1; or any alteration of surface 0 water quality? Alteration of tiroundwatcry •It ;' i` characteristics? 1 q. Charttie in Lite guintity of tircnurlwaters, either through ;.'. L, • t. 7rz dirert additions or with- refer••, q+• �`$� -, dt Awals, or through Inter- 3xt, fcrcnc t•F r• with an aquifer? ' tu• L`u.tl iLy? QuanLity7 �.' a 'n sY ' •I : The trdnct ton in Lite Amount { �> ve or water oth ^rwise available •••y;M1 . +' ,1?•I• 1 for public water supplies? _ r `f�{r�ityy,„ faa �`{ .Try ", � .",.•.'�i �t��"{ K,+p', . ' �,:t' ,� i l 'it l:•1 .• ;• 'J �.:'� • 1 :. S' pl;��l�;y.. � ),6� 9 'kk r'•' �7•#+b'9. +I�i•k y�7� l� "i.e„ A�.;WY �,��1�}ilf ;rj+;. •t'' � 'l,k`9FJa�., tj.,•� §•. .ems• .{'� _ • nl dt• "t eS . 1 � 'q. yb!,,, . I'uyi'x4.. lYUr/ iait.� M,L 1'arc 3 7r v yes HAYIIe IIO Expocurc or people er property to wdtcr related hazards such 1 as flooding or Belches? _ if 3. Air Ouali _ it k tx- Will the pro posal result ins.', , �7f•yti a. Constant or periodic air emissions IVY;.; from Il sources? % 1 from mobile or indirect bl+• Stationary sources? b. �w.peterioratfon of ambient air - ,;•;�, -n,r' ��"; ) %; >i• gnatity and /or Interference s �•! f `°•' �,�. Ftr•, s ;,y't••wilh the attainment of appli- - .. , ��.1`r•.a cable air quality standards? i •.. , i'• c. Alteration or �y" •ti• local or regional% •is• climatic conditions, affecting F "�� -'• 7�r• =9 air mnvement, moisture or tcm- j 1, peraturc? 5 pY.•' _ a 1 .. 4. Siota Flora, {Pitt the co R, !•. P pose{ result in: 1 fi a. Change in the characteristics of 7C . spccion, inrlwling diversity, distribution, or number of any p'• species of plants? b. Redaction mf the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered i i spccirn of plants? C. Intro.lurtion of new or dis- ruptive species of plants _y•;, c% into an area ?, PJ s 7 d., Rmluct ion in the •� �' Syfa�, potential S for agricultural production? / $ +•^ .,i" Fa_ una. Wilt the proposal result in: a. Change in the characteristics of rperien, inctudinq diversity, v , distribution, or numbers of any K Bpecics Of animals? +fit. ` y }�} b. Re 11;rtion of the n)rmi.crr, of any rare or species of animats ?�ngercd IVA •y� ,%v,; Ux•''r�YI�.�.,I(•1hiL�i Y.I+.;J �' _ , fit ' ti WG.•i°..w•5i ky' Palo 4 r} wt.• 'A, t' _ YES HAYOE 110 C. Introduction or nrw or disruptive , p?s}d'• species of animnls into an ,area, or result in a I•nrricr to tae ;;';" •'' •� r minration or movement of r % animals? �',.�,, �'TdF d. Deterioration or removal of exist- �'•�4 `' 5� 4, 9, Yx, ing fish or wildlife habitat? ,5. Copulation. Will, ''the proposal result in: ,itx},.";{+'�{�• ,.5a.' Will the proposal alter the loca- tion, distribution, dnnsity, diversity, or nrowth rate of the - •`'iii'v�;P%1�••':$ • Y M1ummt population of an ar • ;' c7 ' _i1�,�'•.1 s a �. "ti yr b. Will the ptopoaal arfceL exist- �,'`. * },lh�•,'' u+q housino, or create a demand lj• ; "�1 ;•,�.�yy.y for additional housing? 6. .rncto- Cconomic Factors. Will the proposallresu t, n: ♦fir+, a. Chan-to in lo-al or :rglonal socio- i�}; errn,omir characterisLies, : ,i7• incl:nlinq economic or r"nmmrrcial dtversiLy, tax rate, and property values? • Y b, 1;111 {•rnlrcL costs hr rgniLably di•tr:butcd among protract •�'�J 0to hrnef ir• iarics. L c. , buyers, t , :1 tax payers or protect usucs7 7. Land tIr" And Planning Cont•iderations. 7" ' ` till L6c prof +osaT ease t; in: t'' a. A substantial alteration or the e • 1: • �." '1 prcnenl: or planned land use of •, '' an area? 3 /••.' b. A conriicl with any deskptaUnnr•, - '�• 1 rctivc`n, ol ob icirs, or ,7„ ;•� 1 p adopted e plans of any governmental ntitLcs? F''•4 c An Impact neon the quality or quan •• +'�v }' r'r:r �114 city or existing r„nsumpt ive or to non- Con.umpLive recreational • a!, oppor tunic Les? t ycZl•�� tit g • •� ft9�,,}Q.titd6•�g -' s !: .: 'n1�'t ;f "'1s1' ' i'+��>E iI� ir.1.;i �f�'qj[ •,'�- ,.•�I %,s1":�rJf, "/CiN' d['fi.•,"n'+�,'�i''••.,it'`'1 `:f :6.a.:.=h4E�?a"h"•'°o� ic• L0 9 r 1'ayc 5 ' a�'� H YF.S MAYBE NO }� a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular m `�'7 / movement? _ _ _ ` • s b. Ct frets on exi j ?`" "I,•Y , , r'• �.; construction? " • •' .,'. sl„FS'(M1 L, , • • lc: 'l Effects on extstinq parking � �r•';r; �,., /"`Cr'iCf'k.} now parking7j ' .;�;'t`''•�1'`t�� " I+•'ii. d. Substantial impact u pon rxivt- ing "- PPtl t 1. ranrporta Lion systems? - - ru t,r,n p C. Alterations to pre^ent patterns of circulation or movement o ':,r of ' �7 It y yr' f f. Alterations to or effectq on } pre tent and potential water- t t''k } hm ne, rail, mass bt ansiL or F. a air traffic? N N I g g. lncreans in traffic hazards to P.S,. t;i'`• m motor vchirles, bicyclists or ' ' t' "� p 9. Cultural_Rcrourcc5. Will Lhe ' 1t• propo:ial restilL in: ' ' � �; o ,. •_: ,• a. A disturbance to the Sntcgrity % � of archavological, pa {r• � M • YES NO t �•r r :1 •y in U, numb ^r or CS MY indit•idunla or of vortor or pa t11,•n•1.lrnir. 111;1 nlganirms or th, "x7,ofnlrr of p0oplo to such organinms? e. Inercascs in existing , noise levels? ` . 7L tlft• �` f• Cxponure of people to t, P (ltrotfillly dangerous ;,� •y�, • , ;,�; � }F, noise levels? • \_� { �r; �4. 9'c Thr crention,of objectionable •i °1; q �•fi •., +odors? '• •R f�: `lA h.•'`• An increase in light of glero? , °T• .y�., y �? 11. Arathf•lu_s twill the rorosal P 1 't ,.; •r,cJ,rn, tr•t.: a'i i pr'1 result G1: , The nbstrurtion or degratLrilon ' of all)' scenic vista or view? _ ' ;"•• b Thr crention of n iT.a'jt;l'• n aesthetically • ot'ennlvc silo? as" c. A •••nflic•t with the ob7ocCivr of Vi i"• I•• +tnn.0 rd or poten.ial scenic J -�` r_orridors} i '�1-i • �. ��• •� • 12 oC i_lll v•z "n•1 Publ lc crry n•OS, hxx:�o=,, i2illihr pi opii;Z —r�su [ in a nrrq ? for n,•w syntcros, or in alterations : s t�.• to Lilt, follow>.ngt .. C +: �r a. Electric power? ` �f b• I7atural or pnckaged qas? 7'`C ta_ c• Com Iunications systems? * t w fl. Water supply? � x e. Wastewater facilities? 7 ��ly°•' C. tloo+i control ntructuren? 1 t l.ttiiy. 9 Solid waste laciliticn ?''•'eL L 4 h. Fir,, prnl.ccL',ion? i "i(- 'filltia` :M1W�,4g,�`z a• 1, "ol teu ptotcl Lion? �1t,+ J• Schools? t Fh k 1•"11.1: M Other t•orloat. t o nal � ��+�,•' � `+)r'+.tJ:t1•'= 5���rhi+9F4��,' .:1rf,'iur��.i��•.s'y59iit {r •Yh>: Pt'i } >.t4yi^S1if�J"�`�%�L,S°_� '�ti+l,t4 1. • 1 t .n / S) 1. maintennnce of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? 11.• F..ne�rgy and Scarce Resources. wLil the-Prop-Os resui-tin: 1• a. Use of substantial or excessive 1 , ifuel or energy? t•� "j,b.:'`•,Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of cnergy7 C. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? 1 d,. An inereane or perpetuation of the consumption of nan- renewable forme of oner•ly, when feasible rt•newible nources of energy are av,tilable? V Subr.Lantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scare natural resourrel YES MAYDC NO — t51�e.•.. it.. Mandatory Findinus of Significance. a. Does the project have the, potential to dcnrade the quality of the envitnnm-•nt, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife sl•ecien, cause a fish or wildlife l Iputatinn to drop hclow, self nu•Itaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cnimennity, rodure On number or restrict the range of a rare or endaivivied plant or animal or eliminate important exmnples of the majar periods of California t ; history or prehistory? •• , ; b Does the project hive Lite pnU•nlial to achieve shnrt -term, to the 41sadvantnga of loan -Lotm, environmoutal goals? lA short- "` term impact on thu environment is 1, i 1 1. ' •y . r' IHSy . /'r tt�jt •,�1¢iAd+l:9'!'�`i��t�'ij�•'}"• v 1�1.'Y�l,. � K4e.a. M, It Ii , • r} +r! i Page 8 fill" whlcll eveurs In n rel at Lvcly ti•IS MAYBE 110 brief, (lefinitive w•riod of tlmo ) -,Ile long -term I•-11cts will endure %A l into the future.) r ryVr c. nnos the project have im,,, 4 which No inGividunlly united 4, but eumulativelp considerable ?� 'T •. '• (hw vcly considerable !, •; till: means that the incremental effn ctn of :In inrlividLal ' °'t• "" , �.•? ro p )crt are con -' sillorable when viewed in I^ connec ^ion with the effects of "• Past 1`ro3ectsl other current ' i ,:1•r� ern o `•1. ( i cts '1 •,I�c:� , and probable future projects.) • �('7iF: ' „nt•Ir,•II- �i� ” MVIII II , 11,• „Is1 I.611,•Is ,1•I I11 nel .~ eLlnl1,I I.1v. tv, 1.1 feet:•,I, y1' I111m:11, 1 111.:,• 1 °• •M 1'111141 li11•l•1'I 1 }• of Ill,! 1 , •' • I ;�• •' lI. U1SCUSSTMI OF I:uvil RONMrnTA1, rVALUATiON. li o.r of afrirmal the answers to the above qne. -.1 Ions plus n dincusston of proponc•d miLigation measures. Noni It Ii , • r} +r! i a� ' Pri7 r ryVr �r .1ji • .A•,i Z2 ' fl� 1 1• 1 • 1 'Ili . 1 �1 ('I III 1 11.1 1 I . 1 � 1111 ,.1 11 • : t tl. II;1 1111• II.1: 1 � 1111: }1111 1 1 1•. �':. n .�, �. , X I 111 I I . 111.1.1=.. Q i,l'1 .t' 1 l 111111 i VVV 1 11111 111 11,11 1.1 t' V •. 1' 1., \'1' .1 ••. {1'!1 {1'il'q d{ 1I I1 1 L, 1 II "'tr�,,I• 111, .11 "1 d I!, Go. '1'1Vli 1111=1.•}1 {rlI'Ioil: � 1� +. I III I 11 11 4•n1 {I 11 1 I :11,11111 1.11 1 I'f1q•I 1 1111' •' ! Ji•'.F�G ,C.r1� SI. �- 1111,11'PI ruUl11 1.1 :'IS'il dd;LL. ^^ u •'Pl 11'11:'•••11 1.1 11'1 {, llll•1'1•UI It "IIULT• _ 1 , 1 '.1111 1.1 }1 P1 1 1 1 Or 1 �, VIII 11 111.111 1.1•:1 1'111'1•(1 111 •!,PI'II I 1:, ! 1'19' '' C•i111 $1• •11110 A+I�+yi 'rin;r:4 tl 1 !•11 .1 In I t,r 1, 1 1 I ,n 1;11.1 1 i•' ,1 lal .11 1 u•lu•d " 7a';l11'I \9: III;bI,111A'I',tC Inl ,11411 I x11.1 •11 111.111.1 I 1 1 ;J1 III 1'11dh1 i Ilf 11' 'I 1,•1,1. ,11111 111 I;.0 11.• t 1: .r• •Irllr llil'rll'1'�.!et11t11 1 111 ZI 0 � . 411111 1 1;1'1 {eI� r•i �.C�i:1'' «+., 'KVr;�.{'JiTM.K;i'r }tvr��.5,q''i °�i�r.�,.�4' nr+�Sl:n5i1S� ?r11L�R� , • • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE RANC110 CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -02 WHICH REPEALS SECTION 61 024A(b)3, AlEhDS SECTION 61.022 AND ADDS SECTION 61 0219(x)9 OF ZONING ORDINANCE NO 17 THE CITY COUNCIL OF 711E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION It The City Council hereby determines as follows: a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and place and manner described by law, recommends approval of Zone Ordinance Amendment No 79 -02 herein after described, and the City Council has neld a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered that recoanendation. - b T1lat such amendment is in conformance with the Intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance c That such amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plea. d That such dmendment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare of the community e. That the proposed amendment would not have significant adverse environmental impacts SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and has issued a Negative Declaration on March 7, 1979. SECTION 3: Now, therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves the following: 1. That pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the California Government Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 7th day of March, 1979 of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 79 -02 2 Zoning Ordinance Amendment No 79 -02 which repeals Section 61 024A(b)3, amends Section 61 022 and adds Section 61.0219(a)9 is attached hereto and made part of this ordinance. This ordinance shall be in full force effective at 12:01 a.m. on the 31at day after it is adopted PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1979 ?Z15P7�, Ir, ill1ll�' i�: �ifi `hY..��i�.'lF`�IMV:f�f�'� %4f.� 0 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4EHORANDUH DATE: Hatch 7, 1979 TO: City Hanager and City Council FR04: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE NO. 97 -65 and 98 -65 - VANGUARD - A change of zone from R -1 -8500 to R -3 for 9.3 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ramona and 19th. The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors held required public hrarings for the above described zone changes but withheld the enabling ordinrnce until development plans were submitted and approved Several time extensions were granted by the County and the applicant was caught In the moratorium Since - January, 1979, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been accepting and processing apartment developmeute Therefore, the Planning Commission, at its meeting of February 14, 1979, approved site plena for the development of a 200 unit apartment complex contingent upon the finalization of the zone change Staff has prepared the enabling ordinance for the above described zone changes for City Council action No public hearings are required since they were conducted by the County Board of Supervisors RFCOMENDATION: The Planning Division staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance which enacts zone changes No 97 -65 and 98 -65 RispectfpIl submitted, �- Jack Lam, Director of Community Development JL:HV:cc j M� t <� r,� � •i 1 :1' %. j �.'�yd'Tt�: •i�1'{�'lil�•Y; � w , y+. } 71t+ >":'�t .,i.,w ya�,a f.'•�trt, u �a:`�f�r •- ;.i.t` 'I I�, W..+ �L.T..Iin ��� .3 -F•;. .�;;Y: t:l�u,.s ��.< .��1±: ';r. •'.'x zj oCr iU• ra:: d. s.. fin..:, • ti .t. n %, �s S,t•I'•^ f� �.. ?p•, :+r? Si : 2 u :'t.. ,�, ;, /• �+ 1t.N:� ^y_r� r •nt� Y I f nil . LU q nn .'f. � y• .. rd. lam'' I .��; V11 '��r1. � � A � I• tL }I Y rtF• I • I m 'al KL4�' ' ..:.. I • 3. j �i$'� ,' ary a t' • � a Q a '' A �•�,ti � ' • N ' � � � � � ® I X51 I � •'•' rr�rB• � . to I ;fl Mv r. I I C)�•. •: 3;,. .f, ,i; , . ' t � N Lp 2. 421— ,r= - 1-7-1C -it -- ..-a - •-) -_-- - -- f r :,-� rc --t1- N ^- W-CN - �• � I ' I i IA lz ... I + i +' N ply w °d' ®i ^ t • +. �� h k n I ©�• � s. a 6 2 A i N 6�� •1F 1 /\Q ✓.•, 2 � ty t •. �. �• N,� Via: '+ c• ! 4 iwl m_ L i. _.y � .nl`rr. a a r Y s• •�` � rti 1 Ile, esS 1 F I- 5 -onmmV QIVBIHD.4V -1 � �'L s • ORDINANCE NO. 'p 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO :02- 171 -47 (ZC 97 -65 6 95 -65) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUMIONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 The City Council hereby finds and determine& the following: a. That the San Bernardino County Planning Comission,, following a public hearing held in the time and manner described by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described and the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors had held a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard . d considered said recommendation b That this rezoning 1s consistent with the Genera' Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga c :hat this rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as a negative declaration was filed by the County SECTION 2 The following described real property Is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map Is hereby amended accordingly. R -1 "single family residential" to R -3 "multiple family residei,tiel ". Said property Is located on the northwest corner of Ramona Avenre and 19t1 Street known as Assessor's Parcel No 202 - 171 -47. This Ordinance Shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. o,. the 31st day after its adoption PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPIED THIS day of 1979 ATTEST: City Clark Rancho Cucamonga J 0 • M E M O R A N D U M Date: March 2, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Subject: Heritage Park Lauren, request Council authorization to enter into an agreement between the City and the Alta Loma Riding Club. Subject of the proposed agreement would be permission for the Club to use•a portion of Heritage Park for temporary installation of their riding ring. (Basically, this is the same type of agreement held currently between Citrus Little League and City at Vineyard Park). The proposed site plan for the project has been reviewed and conditionally approved by the Planning and Engineering departments of the City and was the subject of a public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 28. Results of hearing was a 5 -0 vote in approval of the appropriatness of project in relation to zone, design and positive contribution to the community. It was further found that it represented no negative environmental impact on the surrounding area. The work would be done and financed by the Alta Loma Riding Cluo subject of step -by -step approvals of the City. Cost to City would be for installation of a 2" water meter and provision of water. (This is also done with Citrus Little League.) Request agenda date of March 7 to week authorization from Council to proceed with an agreement between City and Alta Loma Riding Club, subject to the conditions of the Planning Commission, for a temporary riding ring at Heritage Park. Further, authorization is requested to install and operate a 2" water meter in support of the project. B4 6o .a • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: March 7, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 4866 Attached for Council adoption is Resolution 79- approving Parcel Mdp 4866 located in Red Rill vest of the Cucamonga Creek. This Parcel Map covers land which are a part of approved Tract 9589 which was recently approved as a part of those tracts new eligible for building This parcel map will record to allow transfer of ownership on the lots shown. .� Respectfully submE[tc / LLOYD HU City acct r i. Ul:dcb attachments • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIropwlA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4866 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 4866) WHEREAS, tentative parcel cap number 4866, submitted by Richard Bates of K b B Development and consisting of two parcels, located in Red Hill being a division of Lot 10 and 9 of Red Hill subdivision was approved Ly the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4866 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the regnircacnts established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of - Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 4866 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 City Clerk Mayor i ' ��9 a ,' �, j,��, n; �� � —� , � � „ 3�`�(��•• #�i it �., r r 73 (�� � u ^,fl��: :(,.l>I ��7 +,' l 1 (. «')� .,w F'1, .' j•�•fi9 i,��' i +; "" �\- Iri k� , t r•t7�`t ,:a' �:'• •' y'i � r )t.Si�(�{�i5'i' �" e i '�i na , ; . Y; f':t ^f. � y!C)t:i j'J7'f Ln.. � �''{ _F'ni • f. � v� �� ;�i.,., L a3r.• "CYcyS� �1t �1;;:1jc ,;�:e � '{ltj ,`{{{ � I'( r." (.fr. �t,�: A;S"•,f 17++ i+ )i "1•�)�' f,r:'� {. �tif, .Yi (t��_1r: 1'����r ((}Yj'�i ' i +.• •r��i'�('�'•�j� }V 7�1 ��( i:""ieR�3A ".)Fl�.Y.411d11:1 ., .'•i'.,i) $'! .5iifi'l��iS.r•'r illt't�.. ��GOi t{i �.1A -r� .,,may ,7)•�rr Y•�zY .,.. E - ��^,f+ +rt ��( \I :v Ff): �� ^-� V,V // , Y MM ;:fig r: i � :' ' • .. , I ; tiY •� e Je vj Q_ �� 7 `fit ;t yPy �ft i � S. +• .A • {)) 1;)• .. )I rl Y I�uxa,E n 3 e . �•� ���• � , C� ^4� _ . ";• "/}fir "f. hi , /ref r • If• .'SL �, �IV Q I F \c Y r •, is 1 I r� /•i 1 .. ,1 /f 4 1. `� �) iii` ••y l,il, W � t rill '�,_ ., .7 p`' ,Y • ,�,, ; •),4•. �. �•: '. I. ' 1 , , r : •, �� 1•I) fj ,r71 n-] : r S !.. ,,1. j;ii. �y •7',•41, • �'� 11R,.f �?,� t,'I. (� •• i•,'•.V .', f :, 17, ^ ♦Y4L�%Lili�tf r`i {,)'4{jJ( ul h �� i `• r. .qp.., n, ., ri , r Y- �1 e 7 ♦ ( � ••)rwli..yy" YLM/t)IlB '�1. ' L�' ' ;r. iK i1- � r 2 ., �f.. ' y,., �1 'x•,+ '' �'4i) � 7 a '. � � t'?\ - `:lLf ' i �:},tQ aY (t,,i. .,., �-• ,.rr•.f;i �.. i)' r) a �yo�: 1 f -A ,• .Y.if j;!�+iy4,'� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ,: 1. i' ('ir,.i;'.a+- .,., � h`•yi ^`.-1.' Vii.. DATE: March 7, 1979 •'• • 'JyI�:,K4. /`:4:" ', '«�'�j lx!.- 1t TO: City Council and City ;tanager '•;, '� '�••; �r`�u�ip�` i ry+ FROM t'. Lloyd Hobbs, City Englaeeri, ;; P�:C,�• q.., e S: SUBJECT t•' CUCAMONGA CREEK BRIDGE.CONSTRUL'rION AGREFHENT :'r:i " 'itii'dtr{�1 •rte +k i� x, +. "¢ ,p• :, "ti t -. ��+% dAx �}�•� ^$�' ,7" �r� S• i•r r'<p S'j�fi'{,T I,. i4.i t�. .,,,r•r. ate,' {•,! ,t�f�`y r"j•'v Attached for Council review is a copy of the draft agreement for the con -�'•t struction of bridges over the Cucamonga Creek. This agreement obligates the,`•& �. City to deposit with the Flood Control District $436,692 prior to April 1: "J *.i II 1979 The City Council previously committed SB325 funds in the amount of ,:4',`3 J approximately $440,000 to cover these costa To date, the City has accrued' -i?-,7 „ $220,000 In this fund. By April -1, we can expect to have approximately'E,:'';;'t{ , $260,000. The City is therefore negotiating with the County to allow us -t• to pay the $180,000 deficiency through the monthly coml.:cment of our SB325 Funds Until these arrangements have been worked out, the Lity Attorney has •' -! recommended that the attached agreements not be executed. ••, a �� RECOMMENDATION: It Is recommended that the Council review the attached cgrements and instruct staff to pursue financial arrangments for the contract amount. ., i; f.•a, ,� Res c f .• •t•' ^• 'w`lti.• 4'` . e[ ally eubm /r},'i -•,, Cit ginaar7a �' J x, +; _•� a . ` LH: deb •�1?' . �. • y rv:. x ° Y Y V attachmcnte "' {j t " a'• cl• +•. I to It it p, 'i4 ', '• '• 'YYrt' • f . ( . � • �` � y� ljj�'''y ill \\ •i:7�+,�,}' Ri. �: ° ,:i k. .�_��t. R:',Lir �`n] .fi•ti.:'.,_ Vt.a'i:'J..i1Y.a•(�l� COUNTY OF SAN BERNORDINO PUEDC WORKS AGENCY Flood Calflit hisfiO em ru Twa su..r pe e..na.dJAD CA 02405 Tu.r.ft. 17141 0030"!' • Y.j^ January 12, 1979 File[, City of R. +ncho Cucamon a CITY OF nAhCHO CUCA61ONGA 9 Engineering Department COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, P. 0. Box 793 JAN 1 5 1979 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 AM PkI Attention: Lloyd Hubbs, 718191b111111111213i91516 City Engineer A Re: Zone 1, Cucamonga Creek, Phase V improvement Project Agreement llo. A789/01036 Gentlemen: Forwarded hercvith for your approval and execution are six (6) copies of - Agreement No A789/01036 for the 4th Street, Hellman Avenue, 6th Street, 8th Street, Vineyard Avenue, 9th Street, and Arrow Route Replacement, Bet- terment, and Common Use The total estimated City cost of betterment is $436,692 and is to be deposited into the Flood Control District funds on or prior to April 1, 1979 Upon completion, please return the six (6) executed copies to this office for submittal to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District Board of Super- visors A completely executed copy will be sent to your office for your records If you have any questions, please contact Mr Mina 5 Ghaly, Chief, Federal Claims Section, at (714) 383 -2198. M5G:dlf Very truly yours, C J. Di Pietro, flood Control Engineer 8 C Escobar Chief Assistant Flood Control Engineer �� 0 0 REPLACE Ii E II T, 1 ;E TT _RIIE HT , AND —CM-1-1401; U S E A G R E E M E N T Picamonga Creek, Phase V Bridge Crossings At 4th St., Hellman Ave, 6th St., 8th St Vineyard Ave 9th St. and Arrow Rt. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this dal of . , 1979. by and between the CITY OF RANC11O CUCA1dONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporate and poll tic 'or the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "DISTRICT ". WITHESSE7 WHEREAS, CITY is owner of or exercises cognizance over certain rights �5 of way and easements for street and highway purposes for certain public y roads, hereinafter referred to as "ROADWAYS "; and WHEREAS, the flood water of the Cucamonga Creek hereinafter referred to as "CREEK ", pose a serious threat to health, life, and private and public properties including said ROADWAYS; and iy MIEREAS, the United States of America by and through the United States r: Army Corps of Engineers, hereinafter referred to as "CORPS ", propnses to construct a flood control facility and appurtenances thereto, hereinafter l; ? referred to as 'CIIANNEL ", in accordance with plans entitled Cucamonga Creek i Channel, hereinafter referred to as "CHANNEL PLANS ", for the purpose of aiding in the confinement of waters of CREEK through CITY; and MICREAS, DISTRICT is comer of or is acquiring lands for the construction of CHANNEL: and Pag6 / Page e I of of 8 pages l /!/. WHEREAS, DISTRICT is local interest represen-ive for coordinating construction of CITY'S facilities witlAn CHANNEL. and obtaining rights of way for CHANNEL; and WHEREAS. DISTRICT desires to conditionally occupy portions of ROADWAYS with constructed CHANNEL; and WHERrAS, CITY desires to conditionally occupy portions of DISTRICT lands with ROADWAYS facilities and public utilities; and WHEREAS, neither CITY nor DISTRIV entertains objection to the occu- pation of these portions of their lands or rights of way to he used by the other, which lands and rights of way are hereinafter referred to as "AREAS OF COtIMON USE ", and are outlined in cross hatching on attached sheets marked EXHIBIT "41 through A7" and are made a part hereof; and - WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to replace CITY'S facilities which removal Is made necessary by reason of the construction or CHANNEL with replacement facilities of equivalent function, as determined by the State of California Department of Water Resources, hereinafter referred to as PEPLACEMENTS; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to have DISTRICT Improve several of the existing rITY facilities, which improvement of existing facilities shall Hereinafter be referred to as BETTERMENTS; and WHEREAS, said REPLACEMENTS AND BETTFRMENTS are iteml[ed and the con- struction costs are presently estimated on attached sheets marked Exhibit "A ", made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to incorporate REPLACEMENTS AND BETTERMENTS Into construction; and WHEREAS, CITY and DISTRICT will mutually benefit by setting forth herein the rights and responsibilities of each with the AREAS Or COMMON A789/01036 Page 2 of 8 pages Y/ l USL and with regard to construction and costs Of•REPLACEk:MTS AND BETTERMENTS. NOW, THEREFORE IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1 CITY SHALL: 1 1 Acknowledge the right of DISTRICT, its successors, permittees, or assigns, to construct, reconstruct, operate, and maintain CHANNEL for flood control and water conservation purposes and for purposes of access under, over, along, and across AREAS OF COMON USE withcut need for any further jermit or permission .rom CITY; provided, however, that any such use by DISTRICT and /or others specified herein, shall not endanger, inter- fere, or conflict with the use of ROADWAYS by CITY or the traveling pbblic without first obtaining approval as set forth hereinafter. 1 2 Approve BRIDGE PLANS and plans as set forth in SECTION 2, Paragraph 2 3 of this Agreement 1 3 Submit to DISTRICT, at least 30 days in advance, plans for any proposed construction, reconstruction, or maintenance within AREAS OF COM14011 USE which may occupy, endanger, conflict, ur interfere with CIWRIEL or its functional operation, and obtain written approval from the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT of suc� plans which approval shall not be withheld, provided that the work contemplated does not or will not, in the opinion of the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT, unreasonably con- flict with, interfere with, or endanger CIWIREL or its functional operation. 1 4 Indemnify the United States of America and tha DISTRICT, their officers, agents, and employees against and hold them free ald harmless A789/0103c Page 3 of 8 pages / 1 M • of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from, acts or omissions on the part of CITY, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees in its operation and main- tenance of ROAD'AAYS, and /or in the performance by CITY of any work within or adjoining AREAS OF COMMON USE 1 5 Accept full responsibility and cost for any and all reconstruction, maintenance, or operation of the REPLACEMENTS and BETTEP141HIS subsequent to transfer thereof to CITY, including that portion of street bridges lying above the plane of the soffit of the deck structure, and including roaaway approaches, parapets, walkways, and railing, Transfer of REPLACEMENTS and BETTEPMENTS to CITY by DISTRICT for operation, maintenance, and responsibility shall be effective as of the date of final Insp,ction and acceptance by authorized representatives of CITY and DISTRICT or within ten (10) calendar days of final inspection of CHANNEL by CORPS and DISTRICT whichever is sooner 1 6 Upon billing by the DISTRICT, furnish and deposit funds with DISTRICT equal to the estimated cost of the proposed BETTERMENTS. The cost of BETTER - RENTS shall include the design cos', office overhead, construction costs, constriction engineerinq, and oche, costs directly attributable to this work incurred by DISTRICT Total estimate "• cost to the CITY is four hundred and thirty -six thousand six hundred ninty two dollars and no /100 cents ($436,692) as per attached cost breakdown, Schedule "A" 1 7 Promptly pay to DISTRICT actual costs In excess of estimated cost of BETTERMENTS as determined by audit In SECTION 3, Paragraph 3 2 of this Agreement. A789/01036 Page 4 of 8 pages Wq • • SECTION 2 DISTRICT SHALL. 2.1 Acknowledge the r.ght of CITY, its successors or assigns, to use AREAS OF C01910H USE in common with the public; to reconstruct, operate, and maintain public utilities, REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS; provided, however, that any such use by CITY does not or will not occupy, endanger, interfere, or conflict with CHAIINEL or its functional operation without first obtaining approval as set forth hereinbefore 2 2 Prepare BRIDGE PLANS, and plans as set forth in SECTION 1, paragraph 1 3 of this Agreement 2 3 Submit to CITY, BRIDGE PLAITS for CHANIILL. REPLACE14ENIS and BETTER- MENTS at least thirty (30) days in advance, and plans for any proposed construction, reconstruction, or maintenance within AREAS OF C%lM011 USE which may interfere or conflict with public use of ROADWAYS nr endanger the safety of the traveling public, and obtain written approval from the City Engineer of CITY of such BRIDGE PLANS or other plans, which approval shall not be withheld, provided that the works contemplated do not or will not, in the opinion of the City Engineer of CITY, unreasonably conflict or interfere with the public use of ROADWAYS or endanger the safety of the traveling public 2 A Indemnify CITY, its officers, agents, and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from acts or omissions on the part of DISTRICT, Its officers, agents, c„ntractors, and employees A1R9/01036 Page 5 of 8 pages 76 r • In the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of CHANNEL within AREAS OF CONl1011 USE, and /or in the performance of any work within AREAS OF COMON USE 2 5 Coordinate construction of CHANNEL with CORPS. 2 6A Administer contract for construction of Arrow Rt. Bridge. 2 68 Coordinate construction with CORPS of REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS of 4th Street. Hellman Avenue, 6th Street, Oth Street, Vineyard Avenue, and 9th Street Bridges herein described and transfer to the CORPS costs of BETTERMENTS paid herein by CITY to DISTRICT for that crossings. 2 7 Notify CITY ten (10) days in advance of final inspection of wo-k encompassed by this Agreement. 2 8 Promptly refund to CITY all funds in excess of actual cost of BETTERMENTS as ^etermined by audit in SECTION 3, paragraph 3 2 of this Agreement IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND MUTUALLY AGREED. SECTION 3 3.1 Except as expressly set forth herein, this Agreement shall not terminate CITY'S or DISTRICT'S rights within AREAS OF COMON USE Both CITY and DISTRICT shall use AREAS OF Colvoll USE in such manner as not to 'erfere unreasonably with the rights of the other NotP.loy herein con- tained shall be construed as a release or waiver of any claim for compen- A789/01036 Page 6 of 8 pages 7/ 1 f , 4� sation for damages which CiTY or DISTRICT may have or may hereinafter acquire resulting from the construction of additional facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either CITY or DISTRICT in such manner as to cause unreasonable interference with the use of AREAS OF COMMON USE by the other party 3 2 Within sixty (60) days after determination of final accounting and reimbursability analysis by Department of Water Resources, DISTRICT shall present to CITY a statement shrniing detailed breakdown of actual costs involved in the design cost, overhead, and other costs directly attributed to BETTERMENTS. CITY may audit DISTRICT'S accounting of BETTERMFNT costs and verify DISTRICT'S statement of BETTERMENT actual ♦ f ♦ s ♦ A789/01036 Page 7 of D pages 7^1 • 0 costs, which verification will not be unreasonably withheld should such additional auditing be necessary to clarify or adjust said statement. THIS AGREEIIENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of both parties IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their respective names to be hereunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorized APPROVED AS TO FORM Alan K. Narks County Counsel County of San Bernardino By ATTEST: By -' Secretary, Board of Supervisors San Bernardino County Flood Control District APPROVED AS TO FORA By �tyCer SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT By ChT afnnan, ­Board Supervisors San Bernardino County Flood Control Districl CITY Of RANCHO CUCAHOUGA By _ ay _ 1lor City Attorney A789/01036 Page 8 of 8 pages 73 • • CUCAH07r.A CREEK. PMSL V • City of Rancho Cucamonga Bridges WE 7 Exhibit "A" 7� A B C R+C 0 Rnttcrmcntll) Fourth Street 5' 29' 29' 58' 5' 74'(2) Hellman Avenue 5' 16' 16' 72' 2 75' 6 25' Sixth Street 2 75' 16' 16' 72' 5' 6 25' Eighth Street 2 75' 16' 16' 72' 2 !'' '4.0' Vineyard Avenue 5' 29' 29' 58' S' 71 5' Ninth Street CArrow 5' 16' 16' 72' 5' Route 2.75' 16' 16' 58' 2.75' 4.0' (1) Includes additional width for sidewalks (2) Half for City of Ontario and half for Rancho Cucamongo 7 Exhibit "A" 7� I • • CUCMIONGA (REEK, PHASE V United States Army Corps of Engineers Improvement Project Cost Estimate for CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA Use $66 00 per sq. ft. Total $304,708 Total Widening Cost Piers Pxtension cost at 0th Street (1) Sub -Total 10: Contingency Sub -Total 20: C/E d F C D. Engineering and Overhead Total (1)Estimate (2)113lf of the bettern,ent for City of Ontario $304,788 26,040 330,828 33,082 363,910 72,782 S436,692 Exhibit "A" A789/01036 75 Oettprment Width Length Area Cost Fourth Street 17'(2) 44.39' 755 S 49,830 Hellman Avenue 6 25' 139 67' 073 57,618 Sixth Street 6 25' 48.44' 303 19,998 Eighth Street 4 0' 110 56' 442 ?9,17^ Vineyard Ave 31 5' 65 12' 2,051 13o,36b flinth Street -- 47 47' Arrow Route 4 0' 48 52'(1) 194 12,804 Total $304,708 Total Widening Cost Piers Pxtension cost at 0th Street (1) Sub -Total 10: Contingency Sub -Total 20: C/E d F C D. Engineering and Overhead Total (1)Estimate (2)113lf of the bettern,ent for City of Ontario $304,788 26,040 330,828 33,082 363,910 72,782 S436,692 Exhibit "A" A789/01036 75 •� 22 `.' See % 40 .,'� < tI >tsnr� n D.P /. 300 �' :'•I . CSAI �, .r . �Ir 1�;:' f, ' r• 1 ^2 p NB9 °52 :3 /'W CI7.6 /' �� .., • 1 ? 3794 POURTH 4• a,o0' ps`'. o r J76 2 u 3• , STREET; % * (SAN BERNARD /NO AVENUE) " ' �• Area of Common -kJStr A° s'T°f 7.hl O % to °' • t i `Pi' . 40 �� 1'11 03 9 r!' ''2 b ��' 673' �' in d. :/ •t .O �t o�� H7.3' H7.3-• N w Vii' it �•� {��. i v• Z o i 1 •. J r, • If p39Ae 340q 00ZZ A`s it ti x R1 °: ' •. " b p 1 ,• r• E f� or 1. ra .,, 1'' • th Aile ;r C3 1 � .I :.f• rte. ''•h � 1 ' `' •'/'N A1411 } r lj�,'.' t • . h � ,t •�.� pfd .v,� a • , O p 't., l SGLf /00% 1r h ''•� O t'• , f' Rt. 3f 342 r 2t, o d•,t 4.Yf ZHZ S ?,• U t•yt'f 01.5 ?Ar .. W 'a .• `' ��, ;,ItJ• A 6E ;�r9 :!} "i1ftl ' ` tz /j .^F`I�ay i1'i Qi 1. f'Il I t I:i1': �S'�'rrfl )( •,,e .I ✓•'1 7p. >.4\, .'rr ':Q:., .I Vim• -�' i' 1 '' ( �,, '�'i �' a .,� „i q'� -_ •14'1.'V% •t 1• j {drC•t i” \' t r'e i T• r', r.; i�) �•: y b)`i�i \, '' /Yr'• .l.liti • it 1 + + `, .,d 1 •t`.• r '•r, y i t; t,,• 1.1�� jt -4,a', r'+ 'o, , ''. • •} • °,1 A +, l' `ir.0 •�` .•tt4' ti +1N1'�,� :11' 9 t' � • f,C /�7N!C /REEG••d ' ; } '., '1, '• .. \� i'1i'.•A h4 :'� ''���N'�,,' +l.\ .\ t. •� J REM ..`' � 7E ,y'i� ":rt•'�LIH'7`� IR '��SC r,'.t 4 •' vy' -{ •.�, ,,• :1 rDa AqY I ,, t:i '�a `L' S�. r '• ., r I•. 'r I, , 1 ,R %97r °h�.e ,',j23W.Gtta•M` jr.- aa�•a9•ff•f el.ap•r "•t +..i,'!, 'S\ +i' }•` y�i'.Q Exryirrq 3f,9GFGCt R�iY• �•f'""..yaoro�rr•e am' .• � �•:: � ,'' �� `i t 4 . {`R.Ca'Pa � uy"^ � - Nas•r�cq.✓ esm•• r 1 ' :' '. r7' r r �Ay J 1' •1 �•1j K� ItAreol of, Commoner Use 1 \ Nt�il 1 '4'S'•{�` 9d7e•I, S;ii Zt' J , : ` j!'r• \' , w'd > s3 +, :`�•\/ TE UP th t.•'r'" fry_) • ti :,{ p. ti . B 8y� "'�•c` '` �' • °,a43', .ik4••.ffrN I 'i:�R o '.I?(` t;.t'1:. ,�, �I�1 6••C4- O ' •�i • i�''r Ci.r 'R • r.,rxa' %� v 09 '4 a yrF9� ,• •i �•/s�as• C; '�. 8 C,i .GUrve6 o�.:y;i ', •�.1 ri .., lt.,. ,k'° i r -avrn ire' : Ul`: .. �• r to P •r.0 tpao ',•; 1 r l t. , 71 • i L; :''• _ ,q 75 j5 '4f T PJ' ,r' ;t• •� cYSV fza t`r • i':,r•:. n ,< + \1 QEI /e1in9. /..1 S,,.i:.�i, w�' iK,1 ii °`�t i >',.. ,. , •!.; 1iaaGr+GCt n� iy ti.� ` , >. rc..y`t `17 ^. ,, i ��,C.S� r)tyl.''.•S) r. ::r ir..� R.:1 /.cd•f'A•'I:r %i �4t;•I•j�it`�� �Y� a :•� t '.F + JAN 121979 % " '. ^'A' SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY..' <s� CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL - DISTRICT" i� „ REVISIONS OWN 1T• ^i GATE, 1 I,t J'` r'r' Po[ Ct/canxTiyp LOndS'MQ r 4/,9 JS ;t a;44, re' Belwem,41h et onJ 6 #ztreel; • /' fir i h;' f, } •• r r ': ti .• 1, 11• I. I • ;••) FILE N0:•1° •.\ ,�A1'• �'� r p[1.`.: ,• ?�Pp, :'.: ..l��•h�ii`' � t � : ^T� � ORL3Gn �1jCyt:'; i t ?� '1 1�'•`, �, �t1•• t1�w ,�r,�j'rd \.,;C,�i.'.'!MI�.i ";f Ali �Sd'.�16) %nf�T4:Y�`, :t.•`i''J14r�''E'XH�BIrTY I. SC '",YS'ie. , 'rtk Y t �� Iy.�� 1 i•7yr4 SEE O.R % JOO /:!6 •• � •'N I ti • y r� (• I J. Q, •., N. /m .l J. nd /GI // J g•� ; I 1 1 I` 59 r; t 'f * E }y }Jj {c s 353 �je acne I +n t QD 1t 1191 A.• ' = lRl ! 1 lr:� ICI /./!..(' S �rSD �!{..r �.t Lt'I r: r (.:'% �.: /:�•s • ' 1904' zb �' w J~ V ' •. u•• •. i• i rr.0 •. ' y U i Q R • ' V , REM , a•, lP ;r o I •e! / �RI16A , . f •I• 'i V 352b ArSO of Common 352a v U59 •• D N N W P p D ' I •1' IA.f 111'• ��• , ., i 2 T:1�>• :JAN ••• 1979' v y i r,~ ,,. ' „• •r o SO•oa s7-W Z 7160' —SIXTH �' -' - la "`1 p v 37.00' STREET- - 1 o wo s l 630 z9wS 103301 33667�' t��• See DP/300//4J qJ JJ /rd SAN:'BERNARDINO COUNTY =' CUC.AMD�GA CREEK” FLOOD-CONTROL DISTRICY n: y REVISIONS OWN.'•BY; •tyA 1 f 7 IJ.E D.I 8 3Q.+Q I.• ' PORTION OF CUC AMONGA LANDS' M.B. 4/9 + t tJ • BETWEEN SOCPH STREET ID EIGVTH•ST•REET ' (..•tf +'�. ! .7.. rt Vt. .•t T i • ( I :,� .i: •il.•,j�• %i, f• i 1. Fv�: ' :( T rAn ! ' fie;• ; , ca NAIF FCR RS .xl/-Qo Src orrAi( r 19 7f/.r • \ i-J A370•eoJSp, l 01 D o'A e 371 ee re oo .0.7...< � t 4 4o; ` t Jug 7e 3se oo :� \� .. nl • -' Nd9Vgbrc �Aieew.kc /3• r /3,R70' Area of Common Use CP-/ R :9779d3' d•o1///a- L 1/d d9 CUCAMONGA CREEK PO,e WCAV4W4 Y6IMAO n y AfB 10101 n ' r '*c Te 9B� r 4�u110A'° xlam Je v. h br B4 57 401 B E D *cc u.p I' ,r148 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS OWN BY DATE • .jf/4r I7r r,/ -7• ro I/Sa 9•/17d rllE N0. OP 1300/ ?9 JAN I 1979 EXHIBIT llA41 JAN 12 i9"'i3 sm 97ir E, an OETA/L w. 970 '6y O / 372A D \ z it nr 1:j C . r �1V — l:f Ir r:..;r> 7�`('( 7 Ir- fpl' 401A 4 4o; ` t Jug 7e 3se oo :� \� .. nl • -' Nd9Vgbrc �Aieew.kc /3• r /3,R70' Area of Common Use CP-/ R :9779d3' d•o1///a- L 1/d d9 CUCAMONGA CREEK PO,e WCAV4W4 Y6IMAO n y AfB 10101 n ' r '*c Te 9B� r 4�u110A'° xlam Je v. h br B4 57 401 B E D *cc u.p I' ,r148 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS OWN BY DATE • .jf/4r I7r r,/ -7• ro I/Sa 9•/17d rllE N0. OP 1300/ ?9 JAN I 1979 EXHIBIT llA41 JAN 12 i9"'i3 L= D kF .O \ ILI 0 IA M w LO ses ��rz w — — — w 37j a IN T E Ip t�r:r n.tl IA b ` E 970 'a1.�1 Ij' 0139 7 jt I� I1 Y s SbY*j71!•E I � C�L1 E; 7.xv.kt 372 v NA Area of Common Use a pR r4 At ' r ter CUCAMONGA CREEK Pa' bd.�r'ia� a/ Lo/ /O aaw,,; v u A r-R&Z e7r M B 7044 372 A l.14 j/lil'974703% D 372 B D ajlp A.fi•:J n E, r5 so JAN 12 1979 V \ see aP tioo�r49 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RLVISIONS DWN BT GATE Y 7E FILE NO O.P /300/ If t t� ace OP 1700 ,_ai D JCDC AO t(J l91 �D / 113'95 re 0 10 Area of gioemon Use liu I�1• .•ov \`` a� •yele —way�4, � i� nJ9'saAlry� _•e G r� .r :r3 - --13�--'�4• �Tje•' \ �. �''. o. 3941 !y L! r_ • �+� �..o^ \ I �'•s` 594A T 1 TE u 7.5 }tr°l O `. I / � JC" d h ?a 393 B � i \ L f� . y e O o >\ L 2 I. .�, �/111� • � Nip � � u / 393 A T e j4° . to 373A D w : I 3788 I t� ,, t375 - - °ai'3 `ri .•' TE .i J91We +I CUCAMONGA CREEK !V2 C61C.4,110Va4 LAd:79 Between Ylna7erd AKnee f ' 9111 5r"" JAN 12 1979 I SAN BERNARDMO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REVISIONS I OWN BY r DATE •u� •7a 1' - 1 PoR 1 t 4E 1 Por � 4D A ��� v 1 h D 384 r i •- =Area of Common Use '--- --- ARROW _ RoUTE - - � •- it �aa,a f98 17 ,lc a u4 : a Bo v CA TE / ��,' t 0 i (E• �F � .r� �, 4 t r U397 • •� u! ! A4 Z VVii: FOR 1rS- L Q �e�• W R o 7 -d r-- 19 g .r ,,00 Z MR A s ,S JAN 121979 i see DP 1900,1164 ` SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUCAMONGA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $ J ah2 a144MOAlad 1-41105 REVIStdHS DWH BY DATE ARROW ROUTE. AT CHANNEL INFERSECTIO,1 39s y157J } f 1 FILE I OR / 300 ' r•v111n1A =n" �4 I AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, by and between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "City ") and THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as "Cham- ber "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, City and Chamber desire that there be prepared a Specific Plan for the industrial areas as designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan; and, WHEREAS, The City of Rancho Cucamonga, being newly incor- porated, does not have funds available to it to pay the costs of preparation of such Specific Plan; and, WHEREAS, The Chamber has raised the sum of $ from contributions by its members and by others and desires to contribute the same to City for the purpose of paying all or a portion of the cost of preparation of Stage I of the Specific Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Immediately upon the execution of this Agreement, the Chamber shall pay the City the a= of $ 2. City may use said sum, or any portion thereof, to pay for all or a portion of the work on Stage I of a Specific Plan for ..ne industrial areas as designated on the Land Use Ele- " mant of the General Plan of City. i 2; 3. The scope of the work included in said Stage I is �= described in that proposed "Agreement" between City and zohn " Blayney Associates, and a copy of said proposed "Agreement" is -I- �3 0 S attached hereto as Exhibit "A ". Chamber hereby approves said 'Agreement"; however, Chamber shall not be a party to said "Agreement ". 4. City reserves the right to terminate the services j` John Blayney Associates, under Exhibit "A ", at any time. In t,i: event City so acts, city may, at its discretion, engage the aer- vices of any other person or organization to complete Stage I of the Specific Plan, or City may abandon the project. 5. Upon completion of Stage I of the Specific Plan, or upon abandonment of the project by City, any portion of said sum of $ _ not theretofore expended shall be returned to Chamber. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement this day of , 1979. ATTESTS C ty Clerk CITY OT -. ..LHO CUCAMONGA BY: JAMES C. FROST Mayor RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE af: lName President -2- RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE` BY: i TNamc Secretary i� 3-