Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/07/05 - Agenda Packet
0 AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4ONGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpose Room 7105 Carnelian July 5, 1979 7 1 /-� AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for she City Council agenda mu.c be to writing The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on the Thtrsday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month The sty Clerk's office receives all such items 1. CALL TO ORDER A. PLEDGE TO FLAG. B ROLL CALL Mikels�S_, Palotbo %y, Schlosscr.L _,, Bridgg,,� Frost . C APPROVAL OF MINUTES:J`une 14, 19/19, and June 20, 1979 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS . F `lc(t 3 `11- COMMITTEE REPORTS �t�G a Advisory Committee b. Historical Cotmission - Resignation of Arthur H Bridge 4 CONSEUT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controvaralal They will be act.d upon by the Council at one time without die ^usston. Any Council member, staff member, or interested party may request that an Stem be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion. a Approval of Warrants in the anount of $40,699.47 Register No� - yf 14 b Action on the following bonds: Tract 7709: Release of Bonds to Manfred Hail Performance Bond (road) $32,000 Labor and Material (road) $16,000 (The reads were accepted by the County on 10/25/76) *City Council Agarda -2- July 5, 1979 Tract 7830• Release of bonds to Home Construction, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $36,000 Labor d Material (road) $18,000 (lhe roads were accepted by the County on 7/27/70) Tract 7913 Release of bonds to Novell Realty Perforrance Bond (road) $30,000 Later E Material (road) $15,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 1119170) Tract 7939: Release of bonds to Fred H Koch Performance Bond (read) $30,000 Labor d Material (road) S15.DO0 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/4/10) Tract 7963 Release of bonds to Hare Construction, Inc Performance Bond (road) $28,000 Labor d Material (mad) $14,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 8/4/69) Tract 7964: Release of bonds to Home Construction, Inc Performance Bond (road) $24,000 Labor d Material (road) $12,000 (The roads wm a accepted by the County on 12/15/69) Tract 7967 Release of bonds to Matreyek Homes, Inc Performance Bond road) $58.000 Labor d Material (road) $29.000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 4/6/76) Tract 7968 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond road) $26,000 Labor d Material road) $13,000 Labor d Material (water) S 8,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 12/18/72) Tract 8074 Release of bonds to Hatreyek Homes, Inc Performance Bond (road) $72,000 Labor d Material (road) $36.000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 8/3/70) Trac• 8054: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond 'road)) $36,000 Labor d Iaterial ?;oad) $18,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/19/70) rract 8085 Release of bonds to Frontier Land Company Performance Bon,. (road) $44,000 Labor L )Material (road) $22,000 (The roads were accepted bj the County of 10126171) .' City Council Agenda $28,000 -3- July 5, 1979 Tract 8089. Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. $11,000 Performance Bond (road) $40,000 $12,000 Labor d Material (road) $20,000 $28,000 (The roads were accepted by the Courty on 9/23/74) Tract 8;09• Release of bonds to IWrVada Land Company Performance Bond (road) $60,000 Labor d Material (road) $30,000 (The roadti were accepted by the County on 6/14/71) Tract 8266: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $32,000 Labor A Material (road) $16,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 7/24/72) Tract 8295: Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $54,000 Labor 6 Hsterial (road) $27,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/24/72) Tract 8429: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. ^arfurmance Bond (road) $14,000 Later d Material (road) 3 7,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 3/12/73) Tract 8440: Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $46,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $32,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 6/11/73) Tract 8520: Release of bonds to Vanguard Builders, Inc Performance Bo,id (road) $88,000 Labor b Material (road) $44,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/9/73) Tract 8521: Release of bonds to 5 d J Industries. Inc. Performance Bond (road) $28,000 Labor L Material (road $14,000 Performance Bond (water) $22,000 Labor d Material water) $11,000 Performance Bond (sewer) $24,000 Labor d Material (sewer) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 1/29/73) Tract 8583. Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond (road) $28,000 Labor 8 Material (road) $14,000 (she roads were accepted by the County on 5/6/74) Tract 3607 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $72,000 Labor L Material (road) $36,000 Performance Bond (water) $20,000 Labor 5 Material (water) $10,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/1/73) .' City Council Agenda -4- July 5, 1979 Tract 8649: Release of bonds to Darrell L Hinberry Performance Bond (road) $22,000 Labor & Material Sroad) $111000 Performance Bond ,water) S 7,900 Labor & Material (water) $ 3,950 Performance Bond (sewer) $ 5,300 Labor & Material (sewer) S 2,650 (The roads were accepted by the County on 1/28/74) Tract 8668 Release of bands to Vanguard Builders Performance Bond (road) $50,000 Labor & Material (road) $25,000 (The rn 4s were accepted by the County on 7/8/74) Tract 8 /.J Release of bonds to S & J Industries, Inc. Performance Bond (road) 540,000 Labor � Material (road) $20,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/20175) T -act 8796 Release of bonds to Thompson Associates Performance Bond (road) $120,000 Labor & Material (road) 5 60,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/3/76) Tract 8805 Release of bonds to Trevor Development Company Performance Bond roaJ $146,000 Labor & Material road S 73,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 11/14/77) Traci d806 Release of bonds tr Trevor Development Company Performance Bond (Road) $IBO,DOn Labor a Material ;road) S an,OOG (The roads were accepted by the County on 11/14/77) Tract 8815 Release of bonds to Kent Land Company Labor & Material (road) $74,000 Labor & Material sewer) $10,000 Labor & Material (water) $19,000 (The roads were accepted by the Council on 9/6/78) Tract 8918 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc Perfomance Bond (road) $92,000 Labor & Material (road) $46,000 (The roads were accepted by the County 6/23/75) Tract 8884: Release of bonds to Harnish, Horgan & Causey Performance Bond sewer -on site) $13,000 Performance Bond sewer -off site) $42,000 Performance Bond (water) $42,000 Trait 9267 Release of bonds to Hlark III Homes, Inc Performance Bond (Sewer -on site) $28,000 Performance Bond ( sewer -off site) 30,000 Performance Bond (water) $25,000 ,'City Council Agenda -5- July 5, 1979 Tract 9268 Release of bonds to hark III Homes, Inc Performance Bond (sewer) S50,COD Performance Bend (water) $35,000 Tract 9269: Release of bonds to Hark III Homes, Irv. Performance Bond (sewer) $49,000 Perfromance Bond (water) $67,000 Tract 9422 -2 Lelease of bonds to Marborough Hones, Inc Performance Bond (sewer) $36,000 Perfromance Bond (water) 5521000 Tract 9446 Release of bonds to Kingsway Construction Company Performance Bond (sewer) $60,000 Performance Bond (water) $82,000 Tract 9448: Release of bonds to Meeker Development Company Performance Bond (sewer) $29,000 Performance Bond (water) $28,000 Tract 9634 Re'-ease of bonds to Chavanne Realty Performance Bond (sewer) $28,000 Performance Bond (water) $31,000 Tract 9135 Accept roads and release bonds to Regency Estates Performance Bond (sewer) $30,000 Performance Bond (water) 527,000 Performance Bond (road) $681000 Tract 9136 Accept roads and release bonds to Regency Estates Performance Bond (sewer) 522,000 ma Perfornce Bond (water) $29,000 Performance Bond ,road) 564,090 Tract 9337 Accept roads and release bond to Butler Development Performance Bond (road) $170,000 Tract 9422: Accept roads and release bonds to Marborough Homes, Inc Performance Bond (sewer) S 29,000 Performance Bond (water) S 39.000 Performance Bond (road) ( $166,000 Tract 9280 Release of cash staking deposit to Bob Jenson Builder, Inc Cash Stakinq Deposit $4,000 Tract 9350 Release of cash staking deposit to Lana Ranch Hones Cash Staking Deposit $1,400 Tract 9582 -1 Accept roads and release bonds to the Deer Creek Co Performance Bond (water) $111,000 Performance Bond (road) $166,000 City Council Agenda -6- July 5, 1979 c Design Services for signal installation at Haven Avenue and Amber Street. .. 32 Authorization of 11ohle, Perry E Associates to provide design services in the amount of $550 plus printing costs for signals d Street vacations for a portion of Arroyo Vista Avenue Adopt a Resolution of Intent to vacate an extension which dead -ends at the south boundary of the professional office complex being constructed on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street RESOLUTION h0 79 -53. 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONUA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNAPDINO. STATE OF CALIFGRNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON FLAP 110 V -001 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK e Street vacation for a portion of Hellman Avenue Adopt a Resolution of Intent to vacate a portion of Hellman Avenue dedication which is now unncessary to the needs of the Public due to the realignment and additional dedications made on the west side RESOLUTION NO 79 -54 41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA110NGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLMAN AVENUE AS SHOW! Oil 141P NO V -002 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK f General Plan Amendment No. 79 -32 - City of Rancho Cucamonga A request for an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to remove and reclassify 7th Street in tte area of Turner and Hellman and to reclassify 6th Street. For Publ.c hearing before the City Council on July 18, 1979. 9 Zone Change Ho 79 -05 - Coral Investment A zone change from R -I t( A -P for property located on the southwest corner of Baseline and Beryl Street For public hearing, before the City Council on July 18, 1979. .Lity Louncil Agenda -7- July b, tviy h Zone Change Ito. 79 -06 - Westway Investments A zone change from 11 -R to 14-1 for property located on the south side of 8th Street, between Helrman and Archibald For public nearing before the Cit Council on July 18, 1979 Zone Change No. 79 -01 - Alta Loma Properties A zone change from R -1 to R -3 for property located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald For public hearing before the City Council on July 18, 1979. y Am- ndment to Sign Ordinance To set July 18, 1979, for public hearing tc amend Sign Ordinance to clarify sign provisions for shopping centers 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Revenue Sharing Funds (SEC0110 HEARING) Prior to the actual expenditure of any revenue sharing funds by the c4ty. 't is required that two public hearings be held and four public notices be placed in the local newspaper It is recsmended that all revenue sharing funds be used to offset a portion of the City's total cost for providing law enforcement cervices in Rancho Cucamonga B Adoetion of Budge: for fiscal year 1 ^79 -80. 44 C Ordinance extending moratorium on Adult Businesses Ordinance No. .rill extend the moratorium on adult businesses to February 1.') JO ORDINANCE NO -Ai ' F 45 AN ORDINANCE OF THC CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN ". EXTENDING OPOIIIANCE 110 45 PERTAINING TO INTERI'I ZONING FOR 40ULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING TPE URGENCY rdEREOF 6. CITY IMAGER'S S -W REPORTS A Community Develo ent Block Grant between the City of Rancho 46 CucX55a an t ie County of San Bernardino. Council made an amendment to the agreement at its June 20 meeting Such amendments were not acceptable by the County Report by Bill Holley 9 I City Council Agenda -8- July 5, 1979 B Cooperation A reement oetween the Hou.ing Authority of ............. 62 Sd'1 ernar TT .oyn y an the 1L� ant o --Cu camongd nFpor[ y ill Holley C Grant Funding for St, Train Construction - U S. Bureau 84 Rec amaT of n7an oS7 aerogram Approval of participation in a arant loan program from the U S Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of storm drains is requested This is a Joint proposal with the Chino Basin Hater Conservation District, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, and other Hest Valley cities Upon approval, an allocation of $2,000 from storm drain fees for the preparation of Notice oft Intent to apply is necessary. 0 Landscape Maintenance Districts. Preliminary information on the formation of Landscape Iaintenance and Lightino District No I These districts are for new tracts and tracts now under construction It is recommended that council instruct staff to Lighting District No. for the formation byion o ca pp, and u� E Contract for Traffic Stri:ina Services. Presently traffic striping services is being done under the City's arnual maintenance contract with the County Staff recommends that a contract be negotiated with Safety Striping Services, Inc for services for fiscal year 1979 -30. Report by Lloyd Hubbs F A resolution providing for reimbursement for expenses to mem emirs o}"the PTFn ni g Coimm ss on RESOLUTION NO 79 -55 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COWIISSICN FOR EXPENSES INCUFRED WHILE SERVING AS 11EMBERS OF THE COPIIIvSION 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 8 NEW BUSINESS a Council b Audience 9. ADJOUR181ENT 91 . 104 . 109 P City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 20, 1979 Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9720 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucomonga, California 91701 Dear Mayor and Council mmbara: ,hie is to inform you that I hereby resign from the NSetorical Coomienion. Sin erely, / Arthur M Bridge ARB:baa POSY OFFICE BOX 791. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714)999.1351 r u 4 V r P N .O W H O • N W s r O 20 WZ a� xLL z w u >, r LLm F U. 1� N O C $ W h W > C O S H C U r W Z r N < N ry> y O y S O 2 N r W J > > W S J LL J% J W V C Q R R R O a J W a R R C C> O V U U 6 0 M 0 H N r O O Ill 1.1 f P m C P j 0 P R a u u s V u 0 LL -----=---- --- --- ay c a I d00=00N OO�NinOm CGOJOOr OJfJ -0N.fr H NOO ?faY�m rJ�1 �lOrry W rrOOCrN '.CrC•Pm L NrNPJ n rJ1. -.-0 2 U u P � r .. � o P N a U F R W r JU J 6L -� 2u u o<c L �W O OI_ W 6' C H 7 6 m C c 3 CW Ch ac 30 6 O C C Z a O u U u z u 2 J u z � a '1 LL O 2 W lV G h C a t VI n +I .n fa • a 00 0 o e_ e 0# 0 -a 0 0 0 -! a *e 'f W • u 1 n 1 1 /OONPPrmNOr¢hY }11 NCOO \ :OrF� :v mPO P.O¢N ' POFO Y tO.DNPNPPmONN I N.OI/10 P F N.00� <O W PY P 1 Y 0 fZ U P N \ o P N O 49 J Q • O J ( Q T u =W iyti � JU Q V �W C6 7u O OLL U '7W W C 6 ' III Q C 1 1 Q Q T +PPPPPPPPPPPPP PPPPP •FFnFM1FFFFI`wnF CW FFFFF +PCPPPPPPPPOPP q4 PPPPP JNNN1\NryNNNNNryN jO ryN NIA /N aova oaacaaacaa � .Og000 A f V N V W J uV C N f V Q W 6 W U zw ZWU C V Q WZ N �OYO 2L•LL WC W Z C J ¢W JW�r 60 J O C ZW Q.N +C Qi�fJJ YV1 i O Y3J ` c0 aL:QQ /� Q Q O ZO/ OQ SZ FprVUF N6'U•• U 2OL641 -. •u .... i'YU.'Y tC/.10 YZ�Y4•WWr6 J O .�Jy ZNO OU a 7 6YWJLJ $ Z�VO �YNQ•fy/WUQUWOZ � O C.. J ��S/•VZ/- /•CV/• i // W VO�V »QWQZxN V 2 > tNl'a02 NJ•jYr IS�UC�UU6Y+•�WL Q WrWJ.L Y K6tCNNNY.NNN�t 1 L' SJ%Y =OFN O.I.O NNgN V41N LL a OO4la•O N NY'ONPPM1M1NYM1 P O Z COPPr frrNNT/.//.1 ammgq¢mmmCmOGP � ii 1 Y PPPP> I r + <hmPOrN1.lY N.OF¢ 1"1 'P PPPVVOOUVOOU 1 � y0•rMM1 .0000r....,rr.....rr I` -. •+•N f.I.N NI�NIViaNry "a00V0000000000 a O a j rrrrr NNNNN Y 00000 �y e •- � c o '� � ; �-z� a /(.• e � � - i e�• -'� _ W 00 OO 00 PO O O O .•..+ NN ^Il.l J�'•1O mm 00 00 O NN .00 Nry NJJJ M1M1 NN NN yy � � rr ♦P O O �� .pJ 00 Cmmr Ivry y0 M N Oro PP mnm pp ^y Nln �•� yy VN p nlrl mo I,�tn P J F O •� s a < N d � 2 N P •O P 111 N F m N N .1 P W Y O O r N Z W P P P N v1 r¢ O IV O N O O O O O D< O O O r O O N O IJ N O O O O O O K < 6 Q J J J J J J J L• r f 6 < I- � F Q Q < < < = O O W p O O O O w Z rti O O n w ¢ 6 u r N O N Z a Z J Z N C J J N W < 6 N ¢ N v W 2 C W V O W Q c O J O N V oil l O U 6 G + N \ d W U WWW J O p 0 W J 3 N ¢¢¢ 4Q< O (� W O y j I- ° ~ O U _ 3 2 CCU Z Z p < p O P P P O P Pt•P P P P P C !` M1 F M1 F F FFF F F M1 F F W \ P \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ P y P P P PPP P P P P O NNN N N N N 11 o a a a o a .Ir •o•o•o .o a u .o < W N u m f v .o p O O m ti M1 V .M1.I NWM N P .Pli N ¢ Q M1 U h mmm 011.11.1 •t M1 U ¢ N O N Z V N D Y O Z V W N S r U J LL i Q Q J O M V W K 6• ¢ ¢ W V J O W W W Q W Q W Y V Z Q Z Z 2 S IL Z W U < < Q Z 4 2 V 6 � < V• LL LL 2 N _V W Z Q J �J < ^' Al, S N Y N Y �. N 'L N W mNJ W W W S J A 1 z J Y M1 I.1 cl O P '� Q t J J t <! Q 1 Q 1 6 1 < 1 1 1 7 1 1 a 1 IT 6L O Y O O O O Ar m p m O O m OOU m U m O U O V O U L 7 V! N ! •., ! 1 w I ••. 1 IM1 1 J111Y1 t N 1 N 1 1 11 u < O r O ! 1 O O p N 1 1 1 n 1 o ._ ... .- _ o OQU O ° O c O C G C c G N j j J two w W W W W W W W t11 H N N J MP ' J .7 7 7 AA N N N N N N N N .~i = y ve s N • {I W I u 4 NYrM1 00 NN 0••.N000Q00NOMNY NrM1rr YY 00 IIN Nmmr nN a0 ONPOOONOOOONaa NNaNN as OO rr •• •• ♦• •.•.... •• •� •• •• �MM1 Va a0 TPYYTTyaMmmrNO MMNI7M r YY PP mNNN wm 00 aP rwm r.urwy. PP mm NN NM YY NN N rrF TT as M1_ P � • F o \ x P 6 N a O r N M '^ N 4 n a a a a O O O O O O U O O O Q Q O O O O O O 2 Q 6 Q G o Fo o W H H M H F m o z N • Y ¢ a ' r P W r m \ O N 1 T t m Q y M1 S P N Q C } \ a W WY W M1 Q CC -XW C J NWVJ 2 2 W OM1 U U VIGZJ W N wuu aUU 2 K w QZOO N V O m iwJl W Q 6 \wW OJQJ \_ 1111 _ H O KZZ WUJC WK 0000 O m r00 J -WWOLO Q4CQ Q 1•• JI.11/1 \S�mar L6QLL N H G WJ�-22Z \C NJar U J W W a i 2•+rW.uWWSQTP OC DO 0 Q U V I CS3>}»VUN NU YSNS V Z O O O 4 Q<Q <a NCQF WVOW W 4 Q V C V22T.2S SQ Sa1••VN S =OS J O O POP P (11f P PPPPPOPPPPPPP PPPP P O P FFF M1 F NFM1M1FFM1M1M1M1��M1M1 FFFF F F \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ COT p P W PPPPPPPPPPPPP PPPP P P f'IIYN N N I F NNNNNNNNNNNryry NNNN N N \\\ \ \ Q \\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\ \ \ aaa a a v aaaaasaaaaaaa aaaa a a a o � mm o 111 M1 W POOPrNOO NNN P U aOrMLIM1PraTa OPOM000000M OOOOOONONOOOP Mw11nM O O ��� .+ P )OONnMPrm.0m00 mmmm u M I r omom 1. } Q N } F F t a O O G uW. u v t r o N V W V H 4 N 2 I 2 F \ L n 4 0 4 ^ u a U Z r I < Z < r u Q u o r F F a j v V U a C •- c K d1 O W C t W 2 U Q 6 a V 6 m O V If J W 6 �C T^Nr LL N N C Q H d .... r..IrrrrrrrOr J MMMM J M W T U N Y rN 4 L1 N I S V NNNNNNNNM1NNMO J NNNN r N J O < 111 S I O 1 7 1111111111111 .+ 1111 < 4 1 W 1 f U IUD V P U M1 LL O U OVOOOOOOOOVVO .• ..NOU U O O O O t 1 rNn 1 .•1 1 O O U 1 NNNNNNNNt1.Y1NNN 1 rrNn ilia 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 it O rCO O .+ O? Y 4 0 rrrrrrn O �+^��+•+ O .+ O O O O f \••• 4M1M1 •. O F O r H OOOOU00000OOY F 0000 H V f F I•• F • w7 BA p p l n J 7 J J D N N n N N N N N M' M f � LL I L • • I Q as FF aNm SS NN 00 00 1 mOmO P Mam JOOJ N� •• :Pa 00 00 aM1 :N N I NNM aOON OC OmP /.IM JJ NN P�Mm P au aPN N j �J NN ONNO m I NMN NMmJ �NM N NNNa r m0 n1I' NN I I r 2 P � F O \ Z P 4 I N S N a F- a O a O O M1 N N O N O O N W C p p O O O O O O Q N N q V = ON O O J J J J J J I J J 7 m � m I L as P a N unr W p I r WY wu u zo a w \ • m C1u aw N q OJ m m F 1-r a M JO IX J I Q m¢ O O C 6 LL2 mM m H YN ocrN F F m I Q \ WNa = p S \J IMF .P• u J \ V O •W I O Jq OM1J r LL m I p qm Owl F H q rMP j ? Oa t K JN J 6 oz Im Q W J ara I CC CN G Q Q aPa m UV rmm W :I ^Y S m I TT TM1I- 6 O N F C V O 4C SCC K QW r K J mmP mmm =3J K m JO N O LL pPP 101 I JJ pp p6 iTT F I P F PP P P P PPP P I PPP P \ M1F \\ F \ F \ F ^P F FM1M1 F P PP P P \ P \ \\ \ I \\ \ \\ \ N NN N N N PPP NNN C W PP OPP P \ \\ \ \ \ N H I NN NNN ry a as a a a \ \\ aaa \ q \\ \\\ \ a a as aaa a � • m JM I � U MJN roh m O O KXn M mm ti > JO mm CNm w FPZ V O �+ N O W LL W I 1Q9 w N C LL z Z W O O I W 0 I O V V V L J N V j UP �.W S F JO J r W mrN n m z C ti Jh G = y T w NNr 1 M Q F i TO nm0 ` r O 1 v 11 i 1 K 1 m 1 W 1 1 I C . p w UU W LL V LL O V 1 OVV v 1 J v 1 1 m 11 IL0 z 1 j i O I IL O S OV ,ILL P =. SV1a 1 N O U I NN 1 rN0 1 r c: O .1....'. o r o 0 0 0 0 :•.I.:. :� a of III 1 F G F aG F G r F •. F F o T o I o is •.Ow r o Ga H tJaO V a w V O �J f;N 111 J O J J D/ W W N N N N N NI(III I y N N ZP N N *� ~ < i 1 N a0 FF dNm hPd SJ NN 00 00 00 00 m000 P a :•+N N O O O O O ry m0 r FI OmP MM YY NN PrMm P _ `N OU dPN NN YY ,I�,n ONNO O n rr NNN r •••r Nry O m � •t`4 ~f r m NN t o i�T, w W ~ < i 0 N 1 N N N N N N O U O O O O O ry m0 r FI c < ' �• 1- n H F n i+�� • F r n O n O 0 O n � •t`4 ~f r m t o i�T, 11• .M•, Q n w W ~ < i 6 Mam voov , nNM dOaN , n NMY1 NMmY �NM yNNa ry m0 r �'7 ~ i Z n tC I w n KW FI c < I N \ a I n t o 11• Q n n I W C O I 1•• O O•J•. d q < 0 0 u s I J J 2 qr I W n F m O M O n n IZ I a-0 P • MM N � 6 I n wu Wu •� V 2U w I \u �'7 a n tC KW FI q 11• m I 1•• O•J•. d �!tlj M 2 qr O-0 M •� n I WMh F n n S W \J •p,i Z W ev.m p[ JN n rma J I p OZ mm r VV ¢N U q q •f:P•fi m 00 Yti1 6 j �• = wY Y 1 1 1 I >Y ♦y�• O rN r Q w PFP O 4G V32 wx1 X t l r K -8 J mmm O I JJ J66 q 10 m -10 JO N O LL PPP LL 61 2Fn > •I I I - P PP P P P PPP P pP PPP p n nF n F F FFF F nN FFF F • P PP P P P PPP P W PP PPP p t N NN N N N NNN N NN MMN • a d-0 d -0 a -0 -0a d I O a-0 aad a 1 V rOF m OP •tl �� O O YO xxm •m M Om P I mM [S:Nm O MM J ••, I N.J•, JSU FPS W U O WI C V W ( N C W Z Z yl O n > O W U O •y J N 7 N W V OJ W 2 d S 11• SO N W �• mrN S m w r W N ••� YN G r r Y NNr 2 M I Q Z x MM = dNO F• O < 11 x 1 K 1 K 1 W 1 1 1 < I 0 4 1 1 m 1 1 1 Z 1 p W VU W P LL V LL V V OVV x 0 LL O S 00 POO w P I O V 1 if,N 1 rNa 1 •+ O O rrl• ! U I 1 1 1 1 O O O I �, M f� O OV n 0 r F F F n U00 •- O F< O 00 FO 000 V O U O O O O U O O C W W W W W W W W W W M H N N VI N N N N V N N N r � r ID r r • r� r v 0 1 1 1 1 NN m O 00 NN N N 00 JJ co 00 as 00 as T OO J � 00 F : F : NN NN 00 00 FF 00 Yj O r W O • p •• W O YJ P P TT 00 O 0 NN Yy 00 as 00 as NN u= TT J O TT NN N N OJO r mp PP NN Tn TT as —•' P P TT T In a0 NN TT T1.1 TT rr JY 0 0 NN N N 0 NN 0 0 0 1 1 N F a N T j m N N a F O P O r W O p O W O O O O O N O u= N h N N V N N N O N O N O N p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Q O J J O J J J J J J J J y O n r � 6 ti a •Q- � Q 4 Q F Q N r W O O W O o o 0 0 o o i • '- n � yo F F m J a T ry r .• i C W •N Q s W m C W N P r Y u N � •Zi �' - a o Q 2 O W I �- U i O W S W S H N Z •. IJ W C r N W U U N C U < w C W Q W 2 Y Y C Y 4 Y W O W C C 6 r J n 4 p = r Y U R = J C W C C p P ^ P P P P P P P P P P P F \ \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ F \ P r P P N P P P P P P p P N N N N N N N N N N N a a a a a a a a a a a a a N T .1 N m P O O N r N N Q 2 N p O N P a S O O N W Y N ry > O N � Q S O • N N• U J N r • J U V• C r V 9 O W V y N y = N N + N J O O J W P Y V Y V J N J O J O J O J J V �, �' 1 • 1 r 1 .-� I I N 1 y 1 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 �+ 1 N „i V Or o o OF .ri O o O 0 y O^ O yO V p 0 N r 0 0 0 FO 3 G O O C O O O G C O O N N •l N N N N N N N N W N .oT� o o •- m e• t�`t e t a ��:t • �e W I � u Q • I -- aoa Mamr o0 00 mo mo Nry PP POP NmmP 00 CO 00 NN as QO PP .m..m. hN PNT MOPM OV rF YY as FM1 00 NN ....1 yP U PP nn yy yy _- N YY MM f P O F UP x \ i P Q N a 1-. Q n m m m a F m P O •+ N 1.1 W G O O m G O P P P F R N ry O N O O O C S O O O N O N N N N N Al N O O O O O O O I cc J J J J J J J J J J J W •.' F f F F 4 Q 6 4 Q 4 Z 000 NNN y O moor M w 6 W w F N N V p Q J OC J T~ yl Z p J S S Q 6 K F NS N \ K V r w d FW 1- \ a J •' 0 ' Q o u\ ua a z p K O W w a K „1 pa a== Q > < K 7 S W S W VI U O W p I-. Z 6 CO W\ W + W J U O O W p N O O U W F wu WV Q > 6V O> W LL V V t N 1- OJ C= 00 Y LL Z w V N p I" V6 pCNN Q u u u O J O W W P S N p P PP PPP P P P P P P P r rF FrF F r r M1 F r r P F W \ P \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �- N Pp NN PPP N N P P P C Q \ \\ NNry N N N N N ry m a as \ \4 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ aao a a a a a ,• ,o a W u x mP- M1 O . 000 F Y N YYY ^• M > • M N W u u F z i Q Y W w C u u = w _u Q 1- N N 0 Q > V w N m Z J $ a $ V Z • W Z Y N p W N N 6 0 J J • •- W 4 6 O F Q Z N a H Q Z Y U t J � W Q s J _• Q Q ' O C Iol "Z• O W Q Z M1 N Q NN ^.NN J Y Q M Q M1 Z N 2 Y O m O Y J y V J O D 4 1 U 1 1 �. 1 1 1 •+ I O 1 Q j W 4^ N •+ N 6 N 2 1 LL U i v i u0 i QQa Z V a P U P Z O 6 4 G Y D O p{ O U 1 NNN 1 N 1 .• 6 { V y My 6 0 O O .I+ -1•.I+ 0 0 0 :. O _• D o O -+ =• F V r mm ► mum M1 •. V •- O F r r O O O •Ir O .1+ 0- U C O O O C O O O f O 0 F` O O •- O F t N J J W w W W w W N N N N N J N N 7 VI J J J N N N N N � rl r = N N •Ni LAA I W u a �� Y1M y� 0 a a a maP NJ < JO cco o co I FF 0 0 m m weM1 Inm C d4 and =0 aJ I 1RM PP N N 1[I JI PPC ;;mm 1•IT FF NN as O O M1 h m ONn Nry 1 T ! N N mw mw R1NV M1 I 2 P � M1 I O \ Y C 6 I \ 1 1 I a T Y1 J F i m P F N PI N O P P P P 4 P P r Z r N A N N M1¢ N N O^ O N O O O O I 4 4 O O n O O V S O O J J J I J J J � � � H W H 6 1•• 6 H H F F i F 1• C ¢ H � 6 p I 2 O p I¢ c` 1.11 u • N N W W C M1 u I H \ N I o u ¢ z o ocM1 ¢ o h w v � O J \ cz 4 p 1 a f J /•• .+ F ¢ < I ¢ N 1 6 a 0 F om OZ NrarNC 2 6 p N M1 W J ¢ a O 0 amcmPa M1 V 4 !m • 1V 11 V r• VOOOrC C V 1 V yQ.N 6 V 6 W vvwu01 \ O J Q J J f¢ ry111m11'mT ll O N y J Z 6 W w1- }NYNIpY P P P P � P P P P PP PPPPPO F F 1- M1 F M1 M1 M1 FF FM1FFFF \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ P P P P W P P r 111 PP N N N N I f N N N N NN NP NNmm NNA a a a a I O a a a a as aaaaa. I O wooNNA W O OOOOOC U O NO NOOTrC Oa .0.1 4m COON > N Pm Oa P NIIalrrmC w I=1 .a-1� 6Q TmTmmT V Y m V V O V N W Q J J• O f W N 4 O Q 6 0 V V O W Z Z y 2 W J ¢ O uV W Q V Q 6 m n p N = ¢ I Q W J O • Y • W on z a N 4 z u r p o m N I O O S Z A p / N y N I ¢ 2 O 4 J N Q T M1N .l NM1/`INAA 4 1 6 1 2 1 1 7 0 1 O 1 Q I W 1 1.0.1 I f 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 hPOOUC 1 1 rrYY1 0 0 -1 0 .. o I > V 1 .. .. I 1 i f 11 111e1 $ u r m h O h 0 0 ..s o- 1•+ -Irr_ = V F O r O F• O OO h OOOUOC O L• O U O O O O O O •Y J W 7 W J W J W W W W w W 1 N N N N N J N > N > N 7 N N N ¢ 1 W I 1 u Q nYaaYr OIVam O O NN 0000 rr mW FOF O O Yd ONfwYaY ONam O O PP 0000 P P as mOm O O NN I11�1 1NOOmyPP mm Falna rrNN 1(1 r y Y1PPIn YNNO YY NN NN NN FUF wlnlp r r Op r F r r r NN r z e P 7 F U \ Z P Q 1 � 1 N N r H f1 N N N F S N O h N O O O r O O O O I Q Q O O r O O 2 +I O J J .O. J J J J J J Q Q Q 6 Q Q K or Q 4 Q M 6 F r F H I w O W O O O O m O W tl s r I- r 1- z r z m 0 0 a i W N �1 U W } ON Q rn �. Orr .f.rr C rPP C fort K N Y Ingo c s u ws tl u r tl x w c � LL AiN m t'JO 1 K NGp' f r K YI O y n W I & p1 ' ,.rvFPO Oa W�N - H Z= V p p -1OLr Q 200 z > JO 3 WV VON J ► C -10 nrr to miWLnN I IxnNL{P 6 J Vu N V NN m rl OYOYIn InrF o I1 JNFOFO PPP o X~ .KT. a V V N W rCPPP PPP P P PPP C P PP C P H�FFFF FFF F n FFF F F FF F n \\ \\\ \\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ 'P ?PPP PPP N P PPP P P w PP w1 P NNNNN NNN N N NNN N N T NN r N ,aaaa aaa a a aaa a a o as a a a' '00000 F W Nr 0-cm. OYO N U mo_ 7Jm NNr mYm N In 'AIROOd OYN M �00 N O dY p rrwllnln N.+P a woo m > F +IInAOF NOP N V Ado O Z fnN a ,Y W,Ft NOr O > Nom m NA m N V pt N J• I t W f Q Y Q Q O y 0 U O U p G W V x, �i = p W K 6 W J 2• V L V �• N K J « 4 J J 2 V x N N r V V Q r Y fL V ti V 2 = F r W W I O p LL! J J Q O W I V_ O O z mrr V a pC m V OOm n d O C 4 00 > O F O �VNNN J NNN N Q N W NNN K N ^ N C %/ r N N m 1 1 1 1 l 1 O O 1 p 1 6 1 1 1 f I O W 1 1 z 1 W I 900V0 U OVO N O N F N rNV N O N LL O r 00 p V -NNN I 1 YNN 1 N 1 r 1 rrN 1 N 1 �+ O V 1 NN 1 N N I 1 N •1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 u It 1 1 uQ O rrr O �/ O .� O �+ r O �+ O �+ Y Q O rr O r O O Vvuo �- uvo .- o .- V r- o00 .- o r- o .- r oo � v F n tl o o v o oI7 u o o c j' N1V N N N N I • I INn PP 00 00 00 f• � 00 00 I m w1 .l m n• v NN .p.0 n0 00 m In P I PP YV V O I V w �O 1l1 Y O I V V I I 111 I I O w ti ~ ~ N N N ~ W r J J J J O N 2 W W N 6 1- O O O O F W 6 J N 6 Q O J f p = I 4 2 F N < LL u J Q f O F r O h I~II o P n• rr LL F W a y=1 - J W O .. O r p o < s � °C ¢ P r P r P ti P r P P P P N N N N m n m O I Y n v J. f I J .p. Ia IW J w I J > J J Y W � I I1r I ¢ tb J a N 1 1 p z I i p N N P x O O z O m I I N y P ¢ Q Y N I .l O i N Jt j Y p • "• 1 �+ 1 1 V I r V r O r O v a N N N • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BONDS IN FILE TRANSFERRED To THE CITY As a catch -up item of work, the Engineering Division has started a full review of the status of all bonds now held by the City. it has been found that many streets have been accepted for maintenance, but bonds not released and that we are somewhat behind on the release of Labor and Material bonds. The attached list takes action on many of the bonds in these situations. Labor and Material bonds are to secure a lien on the bond holder to pay claims from subcontractors and materials suppliers. If claims are not presented against the bond within six months of the release of the Per- formance bond, the Labor and Material bonds are automatically released. • The next few agendas will catch up on these item. If the Council has any questions, please feel free to contact n.e anytime. 114 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM • DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 8884 - Release of bonds Located on the east and south sides of Red Hill Countr/ Club Drive OWNER: Harnish, Morgan E Causey 500 East °E° Street Ontario, California Performance Bond Sewer -on site) $13,000 Performance Bond Sewer -off site) 542,000 Performance Bond Water) $42,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by • the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979. TRACT 9267 - Release of bonds Located on the northwest corner of Banyan St, ,eet and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Mark iII Homes, Inc. 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 Performance Bond (Sewer-on site) $28,000 Performance Bond (Sewer -off site) $64,000 Performance Bond (Water) $25,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucanonga County Hater District on June 25, 1979. TRACT 9268 - Release of bonds Located south of Wilson Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Mark III Homes, Inc. 2950 Redhilt Avenue e Costa Mesa, California 92626 Performance Bond Sewer $50,000 Performance Bond Water I $35,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979. ' TRACT 9269 - Release of bonds Located on the south sid- of Wilson Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue • OWNER: Mark III Homes 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 Performance Bond (Sewer] $49,000 Performance Bond (Water) $67,000 4' NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by 'a the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979. TRACT 9422 -2 - Release of bonds Located on the east side of Turner Avenue south of Church Street f OWNER: Narborough Homes, Inc �. 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90067 Performance Y (( )) Performance Bond (Wa er) $52,00 i NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979. • TRACT 9446 - Release of bonds Located on the south side of Ninth Street, west of Baker Avenue, north of the A. T. 6 S. F. Railroad OW14ER: Kingsway Construction Company 110 West "A" Street, Suite 590 San Diego, California 92101 Performance Bond (Sewer) S60,000 Performance Bond (Water) $02,000 NOTE The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by Cucamonga County WatP- District on June 25, 1979. TRACT 9448 - Release of bonds Located on the southwest corner of Beryl Street and Banyan Street OWNER Meeker Development Company 132 East Live Oaks Avenue Arcadia, California 91006 Performance Bond (Sewer) 529,000 Performance Bond (Water) $28.000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June Z5, 1979. 11', LI Ma 9539 - Release of bonds domted an the south side of Banyan Street or, the west side of avellmae Avenue VAM dhavanne Realty 4070 Palos Verdes Drive North, Suite 101 Rollings aills Estates. California 90274 Performance Boon 1"ewerj 528.000 Performance Bond jWat&rj 531,000 io7i 7'+e sanitary sewer and water systeffi were approved by • the Cimmonga County Water District o+ June 2S, 1979. • 17 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ISI:1.1.3J1li7Uli DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FRAY: Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRAfT 9135 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Hellman Av(nue OWNER: Regency Estates 4010 Palos Verdes Drive North, Suite 101 Rolling Hills, California 90274 Performance Bond Sew erj $30,000 Performance Bond Hater) $27,000 Performance Bond Road) $68,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Hater District on June 2S, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road imp -ovement plans and 9t is recocmenfed that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs a qI Ct ly 11 TRACT NO, 9135 IN INC COUNTY Of Sao 0990::01 Y0 MIOC 1 YCOITISIW V mitm V San 1 W 9 603 II V IIIRLI ICCST(IO Is=t flat a VICTIM IN on C O Mm alu % R.'pW Q M CUM R SN KnImSIG STATE V (LLII¢til .,-Of ? 1111IT a 01 a 2.1ill •SIOC11Tll IYOIY111/ 0W.W. 4WpW • ( OWTaN STM [r Q C .. ....n ...- �1 Sy t IYr• 2 k ISI�'(0 L� 1p `'� •� 19 _ y zo it 21-6 1 ~NOTT 1 PART zz 1{ •4^ y13 r 0e iAf- �t +lz. Y_� A..fzD i e r 10 :0 S a \ ifllf`O� Na fA b�+ In AVEWJE I {IMAM .cln 1, IL •_�'1'.w��. YL4pL � W I .n Miwn n .A Y� \W \ w.A Y •wwi.�wV�e Vi.Y�d.'W .n11YYY. Y.4W WYn.. I Yfw.Y .W x1.. 4.Y .F.1Y. lwn n M. 1~4 F • wQ JwYYi�W.w M•w1l.��..1. .w..1 wn.. vwY. .... ����.YYWI FYI• ✓.. I��Y.4 0 ,,all all, r6 QI 9 F a ID•I t 0� T ma- p P A00' p` Ul"d= ILII• all I {IMAM .cln 1, IL •_�'1'.w��. YL4pL � W I .n Miwn n .A Y� \W \ w.A Y •wwi.�wV�e Vi.Y�d.'W .n11YYY. Y.4W WYn.. I Yfw.Y .W x1.. 4.Y .F.1Y. lwn n M. 1~4 F • wQ JwYYi�W.w M•w1l.��..1. .w..1 wn.. vwY. .... ����.YYWI FYI• ✓.. I��Y.4 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9136 - Accept roads and release bonds Located north of Apricot Avenue and east of Kirkwood Avenue OWNER: Regency Estates 4U10 Palos Verdes teive North, Suite 101 Rolling Hill, Estatas, California 90274 Performance Bond (Sewer) $22,000 Performance Bond ((Hater) $29,000 Performance Bond Road) $64,000 • NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979. The road ccnstruction has bee: approved as being it, accordance .'th the road iapro,enent plans and it is recw.mended ghat the roads be accepted The Improve- rents include curb, gutter, sidimilks, paving, walls and street signs 0 N II k D N TRACT ISO. 9136 IA ,.I Ia..II CI I.. IC. A I I I.D US". WgUaia 0 Ipq P! 0 .CIS 1 ..I I RZ. a a..API< . 5114 .SSxl.l]a. . <icMic •. K•JI I a Y!5 ftc .I Ktw.s V 14 CMII Ct S N. Y 1 11.1. Of C111P.I. I! `i I i iC � ti • • ...•r I 0 1.11, : ai i tOa P}Yq.IY.O•q. 'U . 3�i i1I 6 Sri : t it 16' n @ iCj��t�P 9� �a a E�JJj`Y fi T r i AVE Ut -8 N I ]"y3pi R 7� IS 14 ax 15 i� 16 ` 17 JE!` .. T I '• r ..r 1 f L� .l'• i Z - - - -f 23 22 ` 21^ 20 _. o t. ®E7 24 24 e -;I 26 Al T] ifi t i Y, � I . • � � q I 37 H � u i H I .A — _____• TRA:.T NO SI34 M S. 127 rPGS. 60 S 61 5.• -•.mra —< .� u•cm Illxx2 lnunl I wla • 7 m • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Wubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9337 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the east side of Turner Avenue between Foothill Bolevard and Arrow Route OWNER: Butler Development _ 17371 Santiago Boulevard, Suite 223 Villa Park, California 92667 Performance Bond (Road) $170,000 NOTE: The road constniction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve- ments include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. 1 2z V / Rac No. J.J1 it1 .r.... -a,+ -� .:. � ' '""'•'M 111 a =_ i�i:..�s..Glr ••!'" a _. =:: _ ��IrcLjj�'Q -�..: � }-t � I I �� F` _ is - _ •y y�n., I lZ '} ° \i r• '1� } .j:.ryr+ a +Ili v f, I I L . , }� S { '1' •,� :I� iii a' �:l .rr �''r• :i• \i }� uk �i I i . l -c-t �• -_� �t �: i � � Q :.:.v�� i�• � 1 ••Y.e•�A � i 7 rn �I i a> . 1 li !: , ��tl I: 1 � ....`ice _ .._ .. �- �• .- ....r.�' `�� .1 1 = I f II 1pp���• �� �p :i �s•� t, 11 yy !J �!I ' UI _/cv..:aL _�. * •. :� {...,It ii ,.L 41 rJy�� ,r 9 � •1 1 �I1' >> 1� r f•i y Fi >J fi J. 1 T � i • sM L' i i 1 [ "� } � I ` �� t6 �, •Y i f. !t' Il 1 pt �1 :a N • t !J N ,•I.. ` N \' � li : 1 t 11 t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONCA FIENURANDUN DATE: July 5, 19'9 To: city Council FROM: Lloyd Hibbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: C07SENT CALENDAR TRACT 9422 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the a south side of Church Street between Ramona OWNER: Marborough HO MS- 2029 Century East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles. California 90067 Performance Bond (Sewer Performance Bond Ha* er Derformance Bond Md) The the Cucerrongas County nWater eDistrict son June were 1979. The road cQ,Istruction has been approved as being in acrordance with the road imorovement plans and it is ,ecorrxnded that the roads be accepted. The fa�prove- m:nts include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. NOTE: $29,000 $39,000 $166,000 2� I PIFt TAv NO. L.S. ANCRETE _L BOULEVARD �4 a 8 Z INDEX MAP 0 - 500 FD CONC. NAIL O.OS S. 1.SG' (REC ) PER CALTRAN5 _a• R/W MAP FILE NO. 906032 FD.21I I.P W /C.5 BR6,55 1/4 SECTION CORNER L5--er-TION LINE PER C.S.FB. 535/52 ;Lm Fut AVENUE T NO 5591, M B. 6-1/61 -62 1EPORT WUS MADE BY RICHARD MILLS aTES, BY E. OUANE LYON, R.0 E ?42+T7, ON .9, 19'1 -i. 71CATES COUNTY SURVEYOR'S MONUMENT ;ICATES COUNTY SURVEYOR'S FIELD BOOK 71CATES CALIFORNIA OE.PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 71CATE5 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ORAINSEMENT. �1ICATES BUILDING SETBACK UNE AND DISTANCE FRAM R /," dDICATES RAOIAL. ,;oICA:1'ES CURVE DATA ASSHOWN ON SHEET. i1CATE5 v IRON PIPE TAGGED "L.S. 3640 FOUND PER E• 0 SOUTH OF THE SOUTH SOUTH SECTIO FN 0 c C c L 0 0 • O • is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1579 TO. City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9582 -1 - Accept roads and release bond. Located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Wilson Avenue OWNER: The Deer Creek Company P. 0. Box 265 Alta Loma, California 91701 Performance Bond (Water) $111,000 Performance Bond (Road) NOTE The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25. 1979 The road con - the roadnimprovementpD ansdand ibis recaomme d dcthatth the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, paving. walls and street : gns. 0 1 26 :C -- �. " - •-- , ��_ - ` _.cs t� 114: � ^ rN SNC COUNTY Or CAN LCRNAr OIVO,. ' �'• L ••E n. r —� — O at '�t� :� � j t� . � � _ L V • Y..AK- _ � I, to tI •� h t '� INDEk'RY tMPr= a C .. • .. ` tS- s. II i '�t� :� � j r• :.•�. . � Ali ��•�•, '� INDEk'RY tMPr= • 0 i Fir p�•1 i, +- =II.•,� ,[ t! �s u [ 11 •; ,• sq. !• I _N..• _ t .AAM_ <. ':L! � Awn n!.y!(,!•. + f �� ,1 t t A: • 1 F S F I I I! 1 t� Iv � 11•!� ! Wnw Ht ,a•� r. rIV l� o- 6— �1's Ni •jt�+ i, ' IN 711E COUNTY OP 6:. t: LER::ARDIKO •ec s..t c* ro z 1 •t i z '�u.'yC[II � r I.IJ! 1t vw�- yII[ • '� Y i Fir p�•1 i, +- =II.•,� ,[ t! �s u [ 11 •; ,• sq. !• I _N..• _ t .AAM_ <. ':L! � Awn n!.y!(,!•. + f �� ,1 t t A: • 1 F S F I I I! 1 t� Iv � 11•!� ! Wnw Ht ,a•� r. rIV l� o- 6— caw kL z5 X. in TI:L CODT'Ty OP SAN OLNNARDINO wr. o0 1 .umt • .ttec.uu ..c r u �7 FI an •.tr .e r �' i 0 •' i w / j! P `,y— ...:,.!yam• � •• _ rs jtrf °t t ' �I w t�: �A t LNN� ?•� IWILWU AvtuvE ••vr••^c r qtr. _ �_ ►!.J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council eRom: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9260 - Release of cash staking deposit of $4.000.00 Located b t between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street at o OWNER: Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. 226 hest "E" Street Ontario, California 91762 NOTE: than allafinalfmonuments ha eebeenuset and hedhastbeen paid in full. TRACT 9350 - Release of cash staking deposit of $1.400.00 Located an west side of Sapphire Street between Banyan Street a 19th Amer: Loma Ranch Homes 2028 nBusinlss Center 9Drive, Suite 145 MOTE: thatiallafinalfmonuments have ebeenusetyand hedhastbeen paid in fu" County of SLn 8en amgno COUNTY SURVEYOR euemwousmM •825 Ent Thild SUM San Btmudm, CA 92015 �� C1 w r eNb \{�(� wn1r a +ewra -^ 116LO]YKV[YS I7I41 L]SI]I LANOOIVKIOININT III 0363 JSal KLCoOOS 0 60ONO4KY ♦DV,60KY 471.1 vo tall June 22, 1979 City of Rancho OJCannega P.O. Bore 7100 Rancllo (ucmnga, CA 91730 Attention Hr John L. Martin Reference: Tract 9280 and 93W Dear John. Please place the followinC %tons on your next agenda for the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council meeting Tract 9280 - Lying North of LaVine Street and East of Hellman Avenue • Subdivider Bob Jensen Builder, Inc Request City Council release $4,000.00 to Cob Jensen Builder, Inc , 220 West "E' Street, Ontario, O1 91701 Certification from L.H. &Teen, Surveyor, indicates that all final monuments have been set and he has been paid in Pill. Tract 0350 - Lying South of Banyan Street and Past of Sapphire Street. Subdivider Iran Ranch Hanes. Request City Council releastf $1,500.00 to Lcm Rauh Hones, 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, CA 92715 Certification from L.H. Noreen, Surveyor, indicates that all final monuments haw been set and he has been paid in full If you haw any questions Please feel free to call us. Very truly Sours. MGM P Me � �� Rick T Flores Land Development Division RTF•ls LtlNL GaUO.11N 3 ILY✓u a, :uon,v., .e• <s.. - o�vl WMa JN.iI'.l NAYNE.D I DKU4 O[NVI(MAV1S[FGLF 11+tl Dnv¢1 .o.n. OIRM1�NO InnM,Nw I GLa M.L."An, aOBN AU Kn1 am1C19 ODOTNSLND IOWIG OKnRI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM • DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: DESIGN SERVICES FOR SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT HAVEN AVENUE 4ND AMBER STREET Attached is a proposal from Hohle, Perry b Associates to complete plans and specification for the Chaffey College signal referred to above. Plans for this protect were previcusly prepared by the County, but specification have yet to be completed. This signal is included in this years budget at an estimated $75,000. Chaffey College has consented to contribute $5,625 towards construction of this signal and has disbursed funds to the City. ' Services provided under the attached scope of work include preparation of contract plus cost Of Printing,of bid documents. These Mohle, Perry d Associates are currently completing plan for signal at Base Line and Hellman and Archibald and Church. They were selected for th ^.se services based on lowest contract cost In order to take advantage of on- going ids for coordination these is firm, Engineering Divsion chose not to pursue additional That Council authorize the selection of Hohle. Perri b Associates to provide design services for signals at Haien Avenue and Amber Street and to issue a purchase order to the amount of $550 under the terms of the June 25, 1979 proposal. Respectfully Vbmitted, *L1 Hubbs City Engineer LH:deb �& 1?•�Uuln.[Y :..•.:...R..��.�.t i. �i✓;: 7: lkr• rf.' rv7, asia %•afia,n•^�ei/tt.j%'t. °•,n.'y AAOH1E, PERRY g ASSOCIATES ' •r • •. • " June 25, 1979 2 _ •R Hr. Lloyd Hobbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 793 ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Hr Paul Rougeau Subject: Intersection of Haven Avenue and Amber Lane Proposal for Specifications and Estimate for Signolization Project - Dear Hr. Hubbs: We appreciate the opportunity of submitting this proposal to prepare the specifications and engineer's estimate for the signaLization of the inter- section of Haven Avenue and Amber Lane. This proposal is based upon our mrdtin at the City on dune 21, 1979. Scene of Work _ The proposed scope of work is as follows: Specification Preparation — - - Using the County- prepared plans, specifications for a non - federal aid i r� project using the current State - Specifications for the technical - details will be prepared., - -- Since the City does out currently have an established format for specifications, HPA will utilize a format deemed desirable by NPA for this project. I ' ` Engineer's Estimate —� " •.. 7 a „i•:' C ) , HPA will prepare an estimate of the coostr:ction cost is accordance~ •r` with common practice for signal eattmate preparation. 'E 9 CITY OF HAYCEO CucaxoeCA • ' COI64U91TY hEYEIOPMENT DEPt., ' ..• -� � JUN 21 1919 ;.�,:• _ _ Pit •`.r iv;=rr iv +.• ' Y -• r ,I • -v , 718191ID181D- '11w13t4151G, Wa=At AnD TRA 7oRvum DICe+Eiai 2365 E Chou A» &A* 179 ivawzn CA 92631 . VIA) 733,mn we. Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga f Haven & Amber Propo.�al June 25, 1979 3�,, page :2 Preparation of Specification and Plan Booklet • Zx-- For purposes of bidding to be dean by the City* hTA Vill prepare 30 sets of specifications Including reduced copies of the plans to be bound together to form the "bid package." Project Costs It is proposed the services required be provided on a time and ma,terial 11 basis in accordance with the attached hourly rates with a "not to "coed" amount of $550. "C7 - I --- I -n The cost of reproducing the specification and plan booklets is ;reposed to be paid for on an actual invoice cost basis to HPA in addition to the prof .. ional services fee. The reproduction costs are estimated to be $225 to $250. Time Schedule We are prepared to start work upon notice to proceed from the City and can haw the work completed within two weeks. Please give me a call if you have any questions or need additional informa- tion. . -, - " I— --. 1-: . 6 - e Respectfully submittedo MOHLE. PERRY & ASSOCIATES R. Henry Mohle Senior Vice President R1C4:vPa attachment •0 q -0 .l��'tl".r�jw•: _• ... .: l..,r�'::i. ''�°, : -. ��//;��P�,�1'•- i��•t'�•= :r:- l.'�4 °�t.7.1�._�:ll ^.iM. iy4L:i €t`+,r��T`tA a: ,. ..� Wt�'V�y...;'�a�.. p.. q,. •• . a�i�i. +.e.jr'M1�aJ }'p T: . ,. I _ !,y slim 'ate j,;at'•', :w,:i•, a`�. i�•i•V�`'�i�•`•e.:a',�'r��v+ T uL•G .' 'Y;'i'. .E'.jYY ':y:•� -T. �' 11 v MOHIE, PEFRY 8 ASSOCIATES r••' ^ _ u•• ` i�1.' 4y i ate 1 � r . - -. SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES _ EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1. 1979 - - Principal - - - -- S45 00 Associate „y - c , -. J 39.00 -,,• Y .•_, Transportation Engineer' 36.00 -_ •' _ ._ .', , Civil Engineer , 36 00 Architectural Planner 36.00 Landscape Planner 36.00 - Designer 3n.00 Inspector 27.00 • Senior Draftsman 26.00 Assistant Transportation Engineer 26.00 Resistant Civil Engineer 26.00 Assistant Architectural Planner 26.00 K Assistant Landscape Planner 26.00 Assistant Draftsman 21.00 . Clerical 16.00 ... Engineering Technician 12.00 2 -Man Survey Party 70.00 '• _ 3 -Man Survey Party 80.00 - Mileage Rate: 160 per mile ^ • • 1AAaC PAL AtO TRAMRORWbM UlGf4M 250 E Craortw, Am sae :sa TVmbn CA 926M • ma 73W11 RESOLUTION �O 79 -51 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO+NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BEkNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING. ITS INTc.;TION TO VACAIe A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVacE AS SHOWN ON HAP NO V -001 FILE IN THE OFFICF OF THE CITY CLERK BE IT RrSULVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 83CO3 et sea of the Streets and Hlghvayn Code, also known all the Street Vacation Act of 1961 SECTION -'• TUwt the City Council hereby declares Its intention to vacater portion of Arr•,yo Vistn Avenue a City street, as st :m on Map No V -001 on file in the Office of the City Clerk a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference =de a part hereof SECTION 7: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the tar day of August, 1979, at 7:00 p n . in the Carnellan Elementary School Multi- Purpose ram lucated at '10s Cn- nel'an, Rnneno Cucamonga, • California, as the time and place tar hearing all persons obje -ting to the propelled vacation fn the purpose of its deterring whether vatd City street is necessary for present of prospective street purposes SECTION 6; T,at the City Engineer shall move notice$ to be posted conspicuously a'.onR the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing. not more 'ban 100 feet apart and at leas than three slgne shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this - esolution on them and shall have the following titlo in lettering not less than one inch In height• "NOTICF OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record. SECTION 6: The City Clark shall cause this resolution to he publlahed once in a newspaper published in the C ty t0 days before the date vet for the hearing. SECTION 7: The City Clerk Shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall .hereupon take effect and he in full cnrce PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of , 1919 lJ Hayot ATTEST: City Clerk Y' • El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council E City "'nager FROMt Lloyd Hubbs. City Engineer SUBJECTt STREET VACATION AT C014IERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE Tt.e pending construction of a professional office complex at the southeast corner of Base Line attd Carnelian Street has eliminated the need for the extension of a street. Arroyo Vista Avenue, which now dead -ends at the south I of the complex. As the attached correspondence explains, the ap- prcval of the complex involved the decision by the Planning Ccmoission that the ocad-nd prtion of fact thetethatoportion of r the street would enow serve no he no public purpose and become a mintenance and liability burden. The attached Resolution of Intention to vacate the street will begin the public hearing process required by law. Your approval of the Resolution is recare+ended. Respec:Tully su fitted, L10 Hubbs City Engineer LH:deb j7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DhTE1 May 30, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd Mubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: STREET ABA1100NMENT FOR CARNELIAN CENTER At the Planning Commission meeting of March 14, 1979, approval was given to Director Review 79 -15, the construction of a professional office complex at the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street As a condition of approval, the dead end of Arroyo Vista Avenue against the south property line of the complex will be vacated and the property deeded to the two ad- jacent property owners These owners have agreed to accept the property The attached scheme for the reconstruction of the intersection of Arroyo Vista Avenue and Caluma Court has been sent to the Crowell /Leventhal Company for it's use in fulfilling the conditions of approval It is essentially the "knuckle" option preferred by the Commission, modified to disrupt the existing properties as little as possible Details of design will be subject to further approval of the City Engineer The legal process for the street vacation will require a Resolution by the City Council of intent to vacate. setting a hearing date for 15 days there- after Posting of the intent for a period of 10 days is required. After the public hearing, the Ordinance effecting the vacation and authorizing the conveyance of the property can be passed and the deeds prepared. These procedures are now being implemented by the staff and plans underway by the developer. 3V C1 0 J /111, t( ISM / /ti-FJU Centr'+ 2J7 =rJ Tax G. Ja Area 6007 r MO Kr A nr` � � O • y O • Q P 16 U P y , M OJ O ` MP o t1J0 A!B ; � • AVE ,.., ! Y1 zoo (, �; J 1 .)O ©ad OC a V to i 41 �,'�,u� V J P iLM 1• 1 • s... �L� as .O Or. _ •nl 1 IS 0 120 O U p i. Q• ve Q 14 V Q rOO) CO 10 40 40 LS l•'• "Oactf •ems pe CUB J 0, V b U O�ipf • a �0 10070 1 SS 59 LSI! 10 .0 40 LGI 4QOf I! ) +fI /IJS silt „1t •I °o 70 VISTA Z11�– AVENUE S- .r- +•- NvM1 1 1.46 /n�QI /r1LS BO wJ) If'1 "+0[• 1 4IY ra/ Q Area to be /190 .. LJ) +SY vecated I —CARNELIAN -- – -• -- AVENUE —J JI A O A[ � •l/16. Assessors Map I Book 207 Page 56 LA, V �� �� Son Bernardino County ' i • Y' a nREHoyu barricode: iSbvONnoo ��=//y l�vb'1 QY/,a awJ�Z6M JO�.� ?6JS � ®Rer+wE 6 AC. NvfimcNT' Fill {e level 0-t adjace•+: Prcperir y o RemcvE sida.olk, -}er curb < gui N ^ o Cotmaurr si&WAk N cerb < 9uMer a -�o C4 3 • � e e � BEHOVE s h a' 78 0� SfRE67 UeHi i •, _ Q op WaY JRf6Nr N ro N It 0 a 6 O JN im = QW 2 a � ege3its; - 0 M I N P M � V M o°, M RESOLUTION NO. 79-54 • A RESOLurrON OP THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNAEDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTNTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF BELLYAH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON NAP NO. V -002 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE. OP THE CITY CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follrnn: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, at seq of the Streets and Highways Code, also know as the Street Vacatioa Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its Intention to vacate A portion of Hellman Avenue a City street, as show on Map %o V -002 on file In the Office of tha CLLy Clerk, a legal description of which 1s attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the lot day of August, 1979, at 7:00 p.m., in the Carnelian Elementary School Hulti- Purposo room, located at 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of Its deteming whether said City street Is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 30 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title In lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HLARING TO VACATE STREET." SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be publtshed once in a newspaper published in the City 10 days before the date not for the hearing SECTION 7: The CitS Clerk Shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and It dual thereupon take effect and be In full force PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of , 1979. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk 1 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN.ONOA MEMORANDUM DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council & City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs. City Engineer SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELUTAN AVEWE Doug Hone of Hellman Avenue Associates has approached the City concerning his development on the southeast corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line. Part of the development process has included a review of street alin-awrts rawly Base Lino aM W_1 ?sn Avenue. Both streets are presently involved in recon- struction under the direction of County personnel It has been determined that a portion of Hellman Avenue dedication is unncessary to the needs of the public due to realignment and additional dedications made on the west side. RECOMMENDATION It is hereby recommended that the City Council dopt the Resolution attached. Respectfully supditted. L1 Hubbs City Engineer LH:deb 9 • �Z . ■• L s CL x,14 dul Arca is Z It Vata +fti. •\ •r / �J I �1 t •� a V 602 The GARY MM. Armk. JIM M 1W915 Leaves inediation possibility open _T :a spurns resign on cfift -astern Manaps, where Bisaled. Bear Ne Pao , enteral hundred Sandinista Amerluo althwa7 nothan hue. Del! e!( •,bat's w" N. guard is Word re r-o once thin 1 SOD d Sor:nu i tltrawN[ W It can al us anv troops �- The ne.q bombing battened source d"misa Early SialX the with nn eDmeD hall. a „vnes but failed who Sanmmnaa claimed control st�lan Pawling e,e holed the rebels who dah"Ga Surviving Dena to a& a ontr Rejecting OAS ulU (qr ore a aD a coner"e• sunataa Saedl clot Sgh a s contrasting hla pie g, Sooa,a we!qq1p v"nlaeed Dun/en way with battled their state and Sunday from a tom of lersa► way with a Stathaaod statements Sandal were (ran the twmnunkn „pr we ere winning the war mWUnk to a schoolhouse made la two tpeorbea — the Nkangaa's 16 sUtH — Y mj comma knows it a on nearby eaatpe Hin. ant to his national gaud edge that on Sandinista v "r gutrr"a told a tPl where they listened to the eomrtand"" th semod” enderuldwouldtort Nan .hotagrapher rn Barrio Sandinistas celebrate IDttr a telrvued •ddren N the their atv price CITY OF RANCHO edicted I CUCAMONGA rw ofa"we railing of NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING • woensld aMBi a Dart" \shun edit matter .tv to which nit pa nnae and ureter Notice 19 hereby given that the City Council 01 the City of dr d.tAre rrdeud Rancho Cucamonga will hold a public hearing on July 5 at he rorrtnt xfteul prtce traisan 1,&t $ a( N a 7.00 p.m. In the Multi - purpose Poom of Camellon FJamen- vI and aSA tbedetoal tary School located at 7105 Carnellan Street. Alta Loma. to in he an t=ease of N ,m discuss the proposed use of the City's General Revenue the current tight Sharing Funds In relation to the fiscal 1979.80 City budget .et nsae of the major ,rtert e.cept Saudi Citizens of Rancho Cucamonga will be given the opportunl- No netv adhered to the ty to make written and oral comments and to ask questions e price Most have concerning the entire budget and the relationship of Reve- med surcharges nun Sharing funds to IL CLINICS The proposed use of the Revenue Sharing funds (an as- TIME timatcd $165,189 entitlement 10 and $185.189 entitlement 11) is to provide for the ongoing operations and mainte- 6 ply to 8 pm nanco expenditures of the ShorifPs contract In providing law enforcement services in fiscal 1979.80. ,no 8 pm to 8 pm Senior citizens and organizations representing the Interests r 5 t T oI senior citizens are particularly encouraged to make use pm pm " of this Opportunity to be heard and to present their views regarding the allocation of Revenue Sharing funds. tons (66 A o.x` rran>e A copy of the proposed budget will be available for Inspec- y Hansa a the Hu• lion at the city offices located at 9320 -C Baseline Road. pm ttondar tnruFw Written comments will be received In the City Clsrk's Office, a01fe Can 01e Hv until 5:00 p.m. July 5. 1979.44 ORDINANCE N0. '�K' " AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`IONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ORDINANCE ADUll DUSINESSES ANDIDECTLARING TIKE JRGENCYFTHEREOF- The City COO as lfof the ;City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that there has been inadequate time r r gulationsmfori adult complete studies concerning , appropriate o and that the term of Ordinance No. 45 should be ex- businesses, SECTION a, California,o is hareb /camended5t (road asef Section 5 Cucamong . fol- lows: loos: -SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall remain in a Sect until February 1, 1980, and during such period, all ordinances in- consistent with the provisions hereof shall be Suspended and superseded by this ordinance.'- SECTION 3: The City Council does hereby find and declare for that t Ohealthcandssafe safety, ltishallr takeveffect i:mned-p� lit peace, lately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and tho City Cler s a attest to the same, and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after Sts passage, at least once l5ahedT in th iR2 "` California, Ontarioep general circulation, P and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED thin _ day of 19%9 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: TE ATST: ) +!5 L M E M O R A N D U M Date: June 28, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Re: Community Development Block Grant, City - County Agreement The above referenced agreement, as amended and forwarded by Council to County, was determined unacceptable by the latter. (See attached letter) This rejection was predicated on the amended agreement sppecifically" giving the City a cancellation option As the City was allocated $517,600+ over a three year period, with an unequal distribution during that period (356,167+ in first year, $0 second year and _ $161,433+ during third year), the County could not accept that the City would terminate association after first year, 33% of program time frame, having expended 69% of total program money From the County's viewpoint, this reluctance to sign the amended agreement is unda:standahle Further, the County has now added a new paragraph O (page 2, paragraph 2) which "specifically" states My will execute t a Cooperation Agreement in 80 -81 and 81 -82 Briefly stated, the Council options are as follows: 1) Si •n no a reement with Count and compete for Small City acun n rom UD T a s a Door choica as money s scarce cess not assured Further, Block Grant fu-uing would not be available to us using this approach To excercise this option would put City in a bad light politically with citizens from the target area, as it would cost us half -a- million dollars Li -ical neighborhood improvements that will not othervisa t -unded 2) Sign a a year only agreement with County, rather than r:nree year agreement s option also has drawbacks aE 3iminishing our "assured" three year project budget of $517,600+ by 667. We would have to then discuss available funds each "ea. with County Further,this reduction in funding would not give us available capital to do projects scheduled in 79 -80 3), Si n a reement with Count as submitted to City This wou ens a romp et on of pro ects ae approve by Council on November 20, 1978 4 - page 4 )n o))qq 1 Wi �a, ll{ �(�Y(JJJ page 2 of 2 memo 6/28/79 To: CH. &C C From: B Holley Re: CDBG Staff Comments The County has lined up their forces, including County Counsel and the Supery isor's Office, behind this latest agreement The County is dealing from a position of leverage, we are not It would not be of benefit to the City, financially or politically, to not make use of the CDBG funding, which at this time 1s available to us only through the County Staff Recommendaticn: Exercise Option 'T' If you have any questions on this matter prior to July 5, please • give me a call. 811 /mw 1 0 June 25, 1979 Mr. tauran Wasserman, City Managar City of Rancho Cuca:lo.•a7a 9340 Baseline - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Der Hr. Wassaiman• The City /County contract amended and executed by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council is unacceptable as submitted. Should the city desire to contract for one year only, the maximum level of funding fnr Year 5 is $172,533 n0. It is not now possible that an amended eentract can be exe- cuted by both the Dowd of Supervisors and the City Council by Juno 30, 1979. Thereforo, on July 1, 1979, a valid con- tract will EwL exist between the City and County. Please do not incur any coat which you desire to be reimbursed from the Sur BcgT di County Community Block Grant until such time as a valid contract is fully executed. Thank you for your cooperation. VIVLRO:MMITAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF 9111ITY DEVEOPMF.I7f R. aIR1 I SA, Director RAS 1 ON: em CC: Cal McElwain, Super, iwr Second District Robert B. R.igney •••n :A9n tA•ar[[D 'At T:1 ~Df♦xr .•npWE:AER fnv4Owwn RoaVfY. MIONp. i,,�....1rna I CAL YeELnA1,1 I J nr.1 Rook R. 0. TOANS[NO Fwwm Omsl k^ •....�.r,..,�,,.1.v1am•n s0 N .a1 t fMa only {f I u =^ �lVIRONMENTAL IMPRO\ L.MENT AGENCY - Couny of Son Bernadine OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOFMENT (OC4 J R. ANN eIRACVaA 1111 Ees M,n Suett • San BEmwdfio. CA 92415 • (7141 2912745 ��'� June 25, 1979 Mr. tauran Wasserman, City Managar City of Rancho Cuca:lo.•a7a 9340 Baseline - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Der Hr. Wassaiman• The City /County contract amended and executed by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council is unacceptable as submitted. Should the city desire to contract for one year only, the maximum level of funding fnr Year 5 is $172,533 n0. It is not now possible that an amended eentract can be exe- cuted by both the Dowd of Supervisors and the City Council by Juno 30, 1979. Thereforo, on July 1, 1979, a valid con- tract will EwL exist between the City and County. Please do not incur any coat which you desire to be reimbursed from the Sur BcgT di County Community Block Grant until such time as a valid contract is fully executed. Thank you for your cooperation. VIVLRO:MMITAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY OFFICE OF 9111ITY DEVEOPMF.I7f R. aIR1 I SA, Director RAS 1 ON: em CC: Cal McElwain, Super, iwr Second District Robert B. R.igney •••n :A9n tA•ar[[D 'At T:1 ~Df♦xr .•npWE:AER fnv4Owwn RoaVfY. MIONp. i,,�....1rna I CAL YeELnA1,1 I J nr.1 Rook R. 0. TOANS[NO Fwwm Omsl k^ •....�.r,..,�,,.1.v1am•n s0 N .a1 t fMa only {f The Community Development Block Grant City County Agreement tar Fiscal Years 1979 -80, 1980 -81, 1981 -82 is in the June 20, 1979 Agenda packet, page 20 Please refer to this for the complete contract The following pages are additions for your information �q 0 • I 1 WHEREAS. the CITY is willing and desires that its incorporated area and popu- 2 3 4 lotion be included in the base used by HUD to determine funding levels the o t 4 5 5 6 COUNTY for the execution of COUNTY's Community Development Program, and accord- 6 7 7 8 9 ingly, to cooperate with COUNTY in the execution of COUNTY's community development 8 10 plan and program within corporate boundaries of CITY during program years 1980 -81 9 10 11 11 12 and 1981 -t'2, commencing upon the approval of COUNTY's fiscal year 1979 -80 grant 12 13 13 14 application; and, 14 15 15 16 16 17 17 18 WHERFAS, the CITY has accepted a budget advance of $183,634 00 in order to 18 19 F.0 -7r 19 20 achieve tae economies off singe construction contracts for recreation and street 20 21 - 21 22 improvements agrees herein to execute the HUD Cooperation Agreement in program 22 23 23 24 years sl.a (1980 -81) •,d seven (1981 -82) and the CITY understands and agrees that 24 25 25 26 the COUNTY :tll withho.d the total $183,634 00 from year six and seven CITY fund 26 27 allocations; end 20 9 29 30 30 31 31 32 MIEREAS, both COUNTY and CITY seek to coordinate their efforts to maximize 32 33 33 34 35 utilization of personnel and resources and iecresse efficiency and economies in 34 36 37 the planning and administration of the program hereinafter forth; er se or 35 36 37 38 38 39 39 40 41 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED b and between the Y parties hereto 40 41 42 43 •s follows: 42 43 44 44 45 45 46 47 1 This agreement la made pursuant to the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 46 47 48 49 S. Division 7, Title I of the Government Code of the State of California (com- 48 50 51 mencing with Section 6500), relating to public agencies The 8 purpose o[ this 49 50 52 51 agreement is to undertake those essential community development and housing assts- 52 53 55 tance actfvittea under the Act which have been approved by Him, for the CITY of 54 56 RANCHO CUCAMONGA specifically the protect or projects described in Attachment "A" 55 56 Ni�uov>asr an.anr 4M q ATTACHMENT A City of Rancho Cucamonga 1979 -80 CDBG PROJECTS AND FUNDING LEVELS PROJECT Street Improvements Recreation Improvements Contingency Total: 1981 -82 CDBG PROJECTS AND FUNDING LEVELS PROJECT Recreatic% Improvements Contingen, y orm /5/15/79 L] Total: 6/ 1 FUNDING AMOUNT $ 222,474 100,000 33,693 $ 356,167 FUNDING AMOUNT S 127,740 33,693 $ 161,433 a 3 'r f SECTION 3 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AUTHORITY CThis Section 3 Action Plan for employment and business opportunities has been prepared by the office of Community Development,. County of San Bernardino, pursuant to section 3 of the Housing and Urban Develop- ment Act of 1968, as amended, 14 U.S.C. 1701u. L PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to comply with those section 3 require- ments so that to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for training and employment shall be given to lower income residents of CDBG assisted project areas, and that contracts for work in connection with such projects be awarded to businesses located in or are owned in substantial part by project area residents. DEFINITION OF TERMS IV,!ER INCOME RESIDENT - A person in the CDBG project area or areas • of the County of San Bernardino whose annual income Is less than 80 Porten, of the median income in the SMSA $9,439 which is less than $7,SS1. PROJECT - The County of San Bernardino is the prime target or project area. However, the County has designated target areas for CDBG projects. Priority shall be given to persons living within the CoSG projects or target ilea and to busine _es owned in substantial part by CDBG project or target area residents. (See attached asps for designated project or target arean) (Attachment •A'). PROJECT. OR TARGET AREA BUSINESS - Those business firms that are located within the project or target area or those firms which are Sit or more owned by persons residing within the project or target area. 9 i CONTRACTOR - Any entity which perfosms work for the County in connection with the CDHG prcaram. SUM- CONTRACTOR - Any entity (other than a person wbo is an amplcyea of a contractor) whicb has agreed or arranged wit's a Contractor to undertake a portion of the contractor's obligation in the perforzance of work in connection with the County CDEG Program. 9ROGRAM ACT'.GN ELEMENTS A. To facilitate compliance with t'.:e section 3 regulations on CDEG funded contracts, the County shall initiate the following actions to insure utilization of lower i==a Project Or target area , residents as employees or trainees., 1. The County shall establish and maintain a direct-ory of servici organizations, job referral agencies and maapewer training programs operating within or servicing project or target area residents. Z. The County ahall disseminate this affi=&t.ive action Plan to those agencies and organizations listed on the above referenced directcr7, as well as to contractors organizations and labor unions. 3. The County shall disseminate its affirmative aetios policy to the public via news media sc=ow that serve project or target area residents. 6. The County shall incorporate its affi_- native action Polic7 in all invitations or advertisements to bid on CDW f%uuW projects. S. The County shall incorporate the section 3 clause is Alt Contracts for work. (see Attachment 8). {s .. ._ -- - ---'-- -- - Z 6. The County r.hall incorporate their Affirmative Action Plan �. in all contracts for work. 7. Prior to the award of a contract, the County shall require the prospective contractor to submit a signed assurance that he or she will comply with Section 3 Regulations and Requirements e 0 of this plan ( see Attachment "C'). a. Prior to the signing of a contract the County shall require the prospective contractor to provide a preliminary statement of work forces reeds including trainl,.3 positions. 4 i 9. The County shall provide the directory of organizations and i agencies serving project or target area residents to the contractor for use in recruiting needed labor. ' 10. The contractor shall notify these community organizations of available e.=ployment opportunities and shall maintain records of response from these organizations. • 11. The contractor shall make continual personal recruitment efforts directed at all service organizations, schools with lower income resident students, recruitment organizations and lower intone resident training organizations with which he is familiar. 12. The Contractor shall maintain a file of the name and addresses of each low income resident worker referred to him and what action was taken with respect to each such referred worker, and if the worker was not employed, the reasons therefore. 13 The Contractor shall promptly notify the County when the union or unions with whom the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement has not referred to the contractor, a • the low income resident worker sent by the contractor or contractor has other information that the union referral process has impeded him in hij efforts to meet his goal. 14. For prise contracts that exceeds $500,000 and to "very sub- contract on that job exceeding $50,000, the County shall require prospective contractors to submit with their bids affirmative action glans which, at a minimum: - Establish goals for utilisation project on target area residents and businesses. !' - Establish steps taken or to be taken to accomplish these S goals. Establish steps which have been taken or will be taken to necurs the cooperation of subcontractors and unions in meeting thesa goals. i 15. In order for a contractor to establish that he has made a good faith effort to employ or fill training positions with lower r income project or target area residents he shall, as a minimum, R provide evidence that he has: (a) Attempted to recruit from the project or target area ilocal advertising media, signs placed at the job site, + and community organizations, public and private agencies operating within or serving the project or target area, / such as the State Employment Development Department, Urban League, Operation Second Chance, Wastside Community Development Corporation or Inland Manpower Association. (b) Maintained a list of ail lover income area residents who have applied either on their own or on referral from any i source and employed such persorz if otherwise qualified and if Opun Aga exist. r _4y1 B. To increase the utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project area, the County shall initiate the following actlonsi 1. At the beginning of each CDBG program year, the County shall act forth the approximate number Lad dollar value of contracts to be awarded during tte project year by businnas type. 2. The County shall develop a list of business concerns within the project or target area doing business in professions or occupations identified as needed. 2. The County shall advertise for bids in news media sources serving the project or targot area. 4. The County shall sand invitations to bid to appropriate project or target area businesses identified in 2 above. r S. Prior to award of any contract, the County shall require a l signed assurance from the contractor that to tLe greatest s extent feasible, subcontracts for labor and materials will be lot to qualified project or target area subcontractors and vendors. 6. The County shall provide the list of project or target area businesses (2. above) to contractors upon award of contract. 7. The contractor shall contact project or target area contractor organizations or organizations likely to yield project or target area contractors for referral of prospective sub- contractors. C. To facilitate compliance with the section 3 regulation on C.'DSG funds that are being utilized by the County, "Contract Cities", Special Districts and Self Governed - Special Districts, the County -5 -�� shall initiate the following actions to irsure utilization of lower income project or target area residents as employees or trainees and the utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project or target area, the County shall initiate the followin3 actionst 1. The County shall require that the "Contract Cities", "Special Districts ", and 'Self Governed- Speciel Districts ", as well as it's contractors and subcontractors establish as part of their Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and Lueiness opportunities, steps as described in A and B above, to assure that to the grsatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment are being given to lower income project or target area residents, and that contracts are awarded to business concerns located in • the project or target area. 2. The "Contract Cities ", "Special Districts', and "Self Governed - Special Districts" shall reference in their section affirmative action plan for employment and business, the County of San Bernardino's Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and business opportunities. 3. The County shall require that the "Contract Cities ", "Special Districts", and "Self Governed - Special Districts", shall report on forms described by the County, on n monthly basis, thair results of extending employment and Wsiness opportunities under Section 3. (See attached retorting forms - Attachment "D "). PROGRAM MONITORING In order to establish that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities • • for training and employment are being given to lower income project area residents, and that contracts are awarded to business concerns located --in the project area, the County shall conduct on -site and record - monitoring of all contracts. Monitoring responsibilities for the OCD Contract Administrator • - - -- will include, but not limited to, - — .. - Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by "Contract Cities*, "Special Districts ", "Self Governed- Special Districts ", -• contractors and subcontractors to recruit lower income project or target area residents. Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by `Contract Cities ", "Special Districts", "Self Governed - Special Districts ", contractcrs and subcontractors to utilize project or target • area residents as employees or trainees. Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by "Contract Cities ", ._ "Self Governed - Special Districts ", contractors and subcon- tractors to utilize subcontractors and businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the -- project area. The County will evaluate the Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and business opportunities on a semi - annual basis. The gem -- annual report as produced by the OCD Contract Administrator will address the following: - Progress to date • - Employment -7- 617- - Businass - Comparisons with goals and timetables - Employment - Businese - Recommended corrective actions (if needed) - In employment - In business S_1NCTI(1_S efusal to comply and give satisfactory assurances of Failure or future cc-ip'.Sance with the requirement of this affirmative action plan shall be proper basis for applying sanctions. Any or all of the following actions t.ay be taken, as appropriate: cancellation, termination or suspension in whole or in part of the contract; a datermina, ion of ineligibility or dobatment from any further contracts under the CDBG program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurances of future compliance has been received. GRIEVAVCE PROCEDURES Any lower income resident of the project or target area, for himself or herself or as a representative of persons similarly situated, seeking employment or training opportunities with the County, 'Contract Cities', "Special Districts ", "Self Governed - Special Districts', contractors or subcontractors, or any business concern located in, or owned in substantial part by persons .siding within project or target area seeking any contract opportunities from the "Count;• ", Contract Cities', "Special Districts Self Governed - Special Districts ", , "Special Districts ", "Self Governed - Special Districts", contractor Cor subcontractor, for itself or as a representative of persons or firms similarly situated, may personally or by an authorized • representative file a grievance alleging noncompliance with Section 3, 24 CFR 135 or obligations undertaken pursuant thereto. if anyone feels that they have a grievance as described above, please contact: • COUNTY OF SANBERNARDZNO Office of Community Development 1111 E. Mill Street - Bldg. 1 San Bernardino, CA 92415 The-County will advise you of the form, place and time to file your 'grievance. Pursuant to 24 CFA 135.85, 24 CPn 135.90, 24 CFR 135.95 C and 24 CFR 135.100. e L_ /7/20/73/bal -g 11 • RANCHOCUCAMONGA (Old Tom) The newly Incorporated City of Rmcho Cucamonga Iles generally sort of the OnuY7 / Upland urban compiea which is centrally [mated In the wev gnat vinavard ere of Southern California. Inrtul settlement onu«ed sd)acmt to the Santa Fe Railroad a a manufocp•nnq/ Nipping point of the mnr Industry. Jrneyard and Mnery empio"n resided in primarily Catholic, Spanish spooking Cucamonga In the peak Vein pdw to World War 11. The postwar demands far urban land, opening of most productive vineyards In the north, dedlne In production due to 4r pdiution. rd ever Increasing costa of preductlalt have all but terminated Sam am Callfomte "no production, Atelng mt.Yh of Cucamonga with aging homes. Wnenes and shlopmq facilities being slowly emdhped Into a vat modem Industrial and residential epnplen The old town residents) eomnuruty remains. eomntlng mainly of small obsolete Single- femily dw"l..gs which house mostly older re_'.danu wnthout •ass means oar desire to moue to compete far lobs outside the area Outude the barrio throughout Rancho Cucamonga. rapid reudmtisl development is occurring. Partly In -"Pons, to the need for adauata publ.: services, Rancho Cucamonga Incorporated In December. 1977 CONCENTRATIONS OF MINURITY GROUPS AND LOWER INCOME PERSONS- Is i I 1 •R,Ar to AepleaG /«aa11lM«W Cate ••J7,SOO -M SMSAY,C:an Ineprr. � SEVE.Y•YEwR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM r i r 4 $ ❑ PRIOR PROGRAM YEARS Y 71 r a.; t�7 %01 TeW Ioeal,tbn OI ram tlw,lli 6rWM a« C«en Ted laryaaN 60 To Own« Rhtw LMine Tt «t rrw4tbn ltaak AWm«rN Vaw Owanlri} dtwrai.e OavrlN fNnmMa tt 0.a73 fJ a7J Al t,e]e QD.A SAO At TOTAL 4a77 1J a7J OJ I,a7l 994 he {«1 horses Ywt (177S7a Is Of TaW NnaM, Ywt (tAf•791 Yw7 1f97FC01 Vwe I1alPa11 ramW C. row Sl]t,ODO o.«• urea« Nwel Tnet yaMlis re.em «ewa,e 77.800•• Nw«ndd 71 1JM g.B 18.7 77J 09 TOTAL 1,708 g g 10.7 722 !.9 - STl7.pa m.tlA R Rtwrq ,melg111ynL la7 .Nor sm ]ao :Q.Q 0.f he {«1 horses Ywt (177S7a Is Of TaW NnaM, Ywt (tAf•791 Yw7 1f97FC01 Vwe I1alPa11 ramW C. row Sl]t,ODO o.«• urea« Nwel Tnet yaMlis re.em «ewa,e 77.800•• Nw«ndd 71 1JM g.B 18.7 77J 09 TOTAL 1,708 g g 10.7 722 !.9 he {«1 horses Ywt (177S7a Yut Itl]F]7) Vwt (1A]•]U Ywt (tAf•791 Yw7 1f97FC01 Vwe I1alPa11 (Y..7 Ya «] 7•Vw LW "wtmq t"Wnn't Sl]t,ODO S BI,T�] fI0AW1 Alletadon�NauCM f ]19.27] _ N «ehaartaroe ram+ry •� AS,000 2II1.A07 J170.71f7 A]0.f7] svan..yo.am,nu - STl7.pa m.tlA R Rtwrq ,melg111ynL la7 .Nor sm ]ao 227 700 cawrw•arnry 73767 77.697 o.s7e TOTAL 7t21,t100 !1]0,771 1177,906 ft30.727 3237.167 f t1J0]fIM Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga TTRACT: ...S,: J lam law Ft f�nGIT aqd Nal \b Oerb OOe hOlilr 7B8 W i a ienlll 111 Blxe F:bll w'� 111h i 41 a BM :St 2 A R eln _ :-x. .� r.. .. xs '�S fsx 7 .yai�ya,i yry(C ICY{ ,i']wa 41. 61 E l 7 Mai 6111 13 Z Axi r O < � � 10 L 1 Ciiy of Rancho Cucamonga TTRACT: ...S,: J lam law Ft f�nGIT aqd Nal \b Oerb OOe hOlilr 7B8 W i a M E M O R A N D U M 0 Date: June 28, 1979 To City Manager and Council From: Bii: Holley, Director, Community Services Dep. _nt Re: Cooperation Agreement Between Housing Authority of San Bernardino County and City of Ranch-j Cucamonga We have explored Rancho Cucamonga's options regarding Housing Authorities, as presented to Council on March 21, 1979, with the following results: 1 Forming our own Housing Authority is not practical at this time, due tj resources required (personnel) 2 Neightoring cities Of Ontario and Upland would not be _ viable partners at this time (Ontario, after a lengthy period, signed with County; and Upland is considering giving up their Housing Authority in favor of participating with County in future years) • 3 Signing with County, by process of elimination, is the only reasonable alternative n Briefly sum7:arized, the purpose of the Housing Authority would be to construct and operate subbidized rental housi�n No sales of homes are handled within this operat of n Further, the allocation of these rental units are heavily competed for by incorporated and unincorporated areas throughout Riverside and San Bernardino Counties The 319 available units are already distributed Rancho Cucamonga will receive none Staff Comment By entering into this agreement it will satisfy the requirement for a "Housing Assistance program" (HAP) and will not give HUD reason to question other HUD funded programs such as Community Development Block Crant funding in which City is participating Staff Recommendation Enter into Housing Authority agreement frith County and set the number required on page 2, item 2 of Council Resolution at 10 units, which is minimum acceptable Council may raise this number, if it wishes If you have any questions prior to the meeting, please give me a call. BH /mw 6?, 8 d M E M O R A n r U M TO: Bill Hollev, Director of Community Services PROM: Robert E Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: June 27, 1979 RE: Cooperation Agreement Between Housing Authority of San Bernardino County and City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please find enclosed herewith the following documents (1) Copy of •A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Approving the Application of the Hous- - ing Authority of the County of Sa;, Bernardino for Preliminary Loan for Low -Rent Public Housing, Approving the Development, Construction and ownership of Low -Rent Housing Projects of Not to Exceed Dwelling Units; and Approving the Form of Coop- eration Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino and Authoriz- ing Its Execution*; and, (2) Copy of Cooperation Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and Housing Authority of San Bernardino County; both of which I have initialled as to approval of form and con- tent. RED:sgg Enclosures .63 0 M E M O R A N D U M Date: June 5, 1979(nj To: Sam Crowe From: Bill Holley 9) 26ZE"sZZ�� Subject: San Bernardino County Housing Authority Proposed Agreeme Sam• we have been looking into our options regarding Housing Authorities, which seem to be limited to: 1) Participating with County 2) Forming our our own Authority 3) to form an teAuthorityuch as Ontario or Upland) option 2 is out, and option 3 seems unlikely at this time By process of elimination, that leaves only the County Do you have any thoughts on this matter? would you review and comment on the attached agreements and resolution regarding joining the County Hcusing Authority I plan on going to _ Council with this June 20 4 Thanks BH /mw T p� cc: chrono /memos r1 ci 9 M E M O R A N D U M Date June 5, :979b t% So: Sam Crowe &'0M From: From: Bill Holley ne.' Subject San Bernardino County Housing Authority Proposed San, we have been looking into our options regarding Housing Authorities, which seem to be limited to: 1) Participating with County 2) Forming our own Authority 3) Joining with another city (such as Ontario or Upland) to form an Authority option 2 is out, and option 3 seems unlikely at this time By process of elimination, that leaves only the County Do you have any thoughts - on this t:acter4 Would you review and comment on the attached agreements and resolution regarding joining the County Housing Authority. flan on going to Council with this June 20 Thanks BH /s F owe cc: chrono /memos 65 0 • 14HEREAS, Pursuant to Section 15 (7) (b) of the Act, as amended, is is necessary that the local governing body enter into a Cooperation Agreement with the Local Authority providing for local cooperation in connection with such low -rent housing project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34515 of the Health and Safety Code express authority is given for local governing bodies to enter in agreements with housing authorities providing for local cooperation with respect to low -rent housing projects; and idHEREAS. Pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Section 34518 of the California Health and Safety Code, this governing body did on March 7, 1979 _ adopt a Resolution authorizing the publication n a newspaper of general circulation on arch 13 and of n notice of public hearing to be a on Plafc— before this governing body for the purpose of giving a nteresc a persons an opportunity to be heard as to whether such C000eration Agreement should be entered into; and there has been made available one copy of the proposed Cooperation Agreement for inspection by interested persons prior to the mentioned public hearing, and 11HEREAS, the notices for a public hearing have been published - as above provided, and this governing body has held a public hearivin starting at the hour of 7 p.m. on the 21 day of March . giving all interested persons an opportunity to bn Feard as to wFE er the proposed Cooperation Agreement in the form hereinafter set forth should • 6e entered into, which said hearing has been concluded with all matters in connection therewith having been fully considered by this body, N0'1, THFREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows 1 There exists in this locality a need for such low -rent housing at rents within the means of low- income families or persons 2 The application of the Local Authority to HUD for a Preliminary Loan in an amount not to exceed (,4 of units x $500 surveys and planning in connection with low -rent hous ng pro ects of not to exceed dwelling units is hereby approved 3 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the development, construction and ownership by the Local Authority of the project as defined in Paragraph 1(a) of the Cooperation Agreement scc forth in Paragraph 4 hereof 4 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, after having held a public hearing and giving all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, hereby determines, pursuant to the provisions of the California Housing Cooperation Law (being Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code), to enter into a Cooperation Agreement in substantially the form hereinafter set forth with the Local Authority The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino is hereby auth- orised and directed to execute such Cooperation Agreement in the name ® and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix or impress the official seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga thereon and to attest to same Such Cooperation Agreement shall be in sybs�antially the form of the agreement attached hereto. 1111�1/U� -2- _. 5 This Resolution sha!l become effective immediately PASSED AND ADOPTED by the :Lty of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of ATTEST cy er yor o t e cy of Rancho Cucamonga • c' Ci Attorney L COOPERATION AGREEMENT • This Agreement entered Into this day of 1979, by and between the Hcusing Authority of the County of San Bcrnardina, (herein called the "Local Authority ") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (herein called the "Mciicipality "), witneuseth: In consideration of the mutu-1 covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1 Whenever used 1a this Agreement: (a) The tern "Project" shall mean any low -rant housing hereafter developed as an entity by the Local Authority with financial assistance of the United States of America acting through the Secretary of Housing acd Urban Development (herein called the "Government"), excluding, however, any low -rent housing project covered by any contract for loans and annual contributions entered into becwcen the Local Authority and the Government, or Its predecessor agencies, prior to the date of this Agreement. (b) The tern "Taxing Body" shall mean the State or any PolItiCdl subdivision or taxing unit thereof in which a Project is situated and which would have authority to assess or levy real or personal property taxes or to certify such taxes to a taxing body or publt�c • officer to be levied for its use and benefit with respect to a Project if it were not exempt from taxation (c) The term "Shelter Rent" shall mean the total of all charges to all tenarts of a Project for dwelling rents and nondwelling rents (excluding all other income of such Projects), less the cost to the Local Auth rity of all dwelling and rondwelling utili- ties. (d) The term "Slum" shall mean any area where dwellings predomin- ate which, by reason of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrange- ment or design, lack of ventilation, light or sanitation facilities, or any combinattur of these factors, are detrimental to safety, health, or morals n U The Local Authority shall in coordination with the Local Govern- ing nod y endeavor (a) To secure a contract or contracts with the Government for loans and annual contributions covering one or more projects comprising a total number of duelling units of lov -rent housing to to built or rehabilitated, not to exceed SS of the total dwelling units within the Municipality and (b) To develop and ndmintater such project or projects, each of which shall be located within the corporate limits of the Munlcinality. The obligations of the parties hereto shall apply to each such project. ,i B. (a) Under the constitution and statutes of the State of California, all Projects are exempt from all real and personal property taxes e and specinl assessments levied or imposed by any Taxing Oody Vi[Ir respect to any Project, so long as either (1) such Project 1a owned by a public body or governmental agency and 1s used for low -rent housing purposes, or (11) any contract between the Local Authority and the Government for loans or annual contributions, or both in connection with such Project remains in force and effect, or (111) any bonds issued in connection with such Project or any monies due to the Government in connection with such Project remain unpaid, whichever period is the longest, the Municipality agrees it will not levy or impose any real or personal property taxes or special assessments upon such Project or upon the Local Authority with respect thereto During such period, the Local Authority shall make artual payments (herein called "Payments in Lieu of Taxes ") In lieu of such taxes and special assessments and in payment for the Public services and facilities furnished from time to time without other cost or charge for or with respect to such Project. Each such annual Payment in Lieu of Taxes shall be mado at the time when real property taxes on such Project would be paid if it- were subject to taxation, and shall be in an amount equal to either (1) ten percent (10%) of the Shelter Bent charged by the focal Authority in respect to such Project during the 12 months' period ending Sentrmber 30 before such payment 1s made, 6b /or (ti) the amount permitted to be paid by applicable state law in effect on the care such payment is made, whichever amount is the • lover The Municipality shall distribute the Payments i.1 Lieu of Taxes among the Taxing Bodies in the proportion which the real property taxes which would hive been paid to each Taxing Body for such year if the Project were not exempt from taxation bears to the total real property taxes which would have been paid to all of the Taxing Bodies for such year if the Project were not exempt from taxation; Provided, however, that no paynent for any year shall be made to any Taxing Body in exress of On amount of the real property taxes which would have been paid to such Taxing Body for such year if the Project were not exempt from taxation Upon failure of the Local Authority to cake any Payment in Lieu of Taxes, no lien aga.nst any Project or assets of the Local Authority shall attach, not shall any interest or penalties accrue or attach on account thereof 4 During the period commtncing with the date of the acquisition of any part of the site or sites of any Project and continuing so long as either (1) such Project is owned by a public body or governmental agency and is used for low -rent housing purposes, or (ii) any contract between the Local Authority and the Government for loans or annual contributions, or both, in connection with such Project remains in • force and effect, or (iii) any bonds issued in connection with Duch Project or any monies duo to the Government in connection with such Project remain unpaid, whichever period is the longest, the Municipality without cost or charge to the Local Authority or the tenants of such Project (other than the Payments in Lieu of Taxes) shall: (a) Furnish or cause to be furnished to the Local Authority and the tenants of such Project public servicen and facilities of the same character and to the same extent as are furnished from time to time without cost or charge to other dwellings and inhabitants in the Municipality; (b) Vacate such streets, roads, and alleys within the area of such Projec� as may be necessary in tha development thereof; and convey without charge to the Local Authority such interest as the Municipality may have in such vacated areas; and, in so far as It 1s lawfully able to do so without cost or expense to the Local Authority or to the Municipality, r use to be removed from such vacated areas, in so far as it may be necessary, all public or private utility lines nd equipment; (c) In so far as the Municipality may lawfully do so, • (i) grant such deviations from the building code of the Municipality as are reasonable and necessary to promore economy one efficiency In the development and adminis- trntion of such Project and at the same time safeguard health and safety, and (11) make such changes in any raaff� of the site and surrounding territory of such Project as are reasonable and necessary for the develop- ment and protection of such Project and the surrounding territory; (d) Accept grants of easements necessary for the develop- ment of such Project; and (e) Ccoperate with the Local Authority by such other lawful action or ways as the Municipality and the Local Authority may find necessary in connection with the development and administration of such project 5 In respect to any Project the Municipality further agrees that within a reasonalle time after receipt of a written request therefor from the Local Authority: (a) It will accept the dedication of all interior st,teta, roads, alleys, and adjacent sidewalLs within the area ,f such Project, together with all storm and sanitary Dewar mains in such dedicated areas, after the Local Authority, at its own expense, has completed the grading, Improve- ment, paving, and installation thereof In accordance w.th specifications acceptable tom the Municipality: / J r / t/ (b) It will accept necessary dedication of land for, and will Grade. improve, pave, and provide sidewalks far, all streets • bounding such Project or necessary to provide adequate nccees thereto (in consideration whe eof the Local Luthority shall pay to the Municipality such anount as would be assessed agnlnst the Project Site for such work if such site were privately owned); and (c) It will pravi.!e, or cause to be provided, water mains, and storm and sanitary sever mains, leading to such Project and serving the bounding streets thereof (In consideration whereof the Local Authority shall pay to the Municipality such amount as would be assessed against the Project Sice for such work if such site were privately owned) If by reason of the Municipality's failure or refusal to furnish or cause to be furnished any public services or facilities which it has agreed hereunder to furnish or to cause to be furnished to tte Local Authority or to the tenants of any Project, the Local Authority incurs any expense to obtain sich services or facilities then the Local Authority may deduct the amount of such a sense from any Payments in Lieu of Taxes due or to _ become due to the Municipality in respect to aiy Project or any other low -rent housana projects owned or operated by the Local Authority. No Cooperation Agreement heretofore entered into between the Municipality and the Local Authority shall be construed to apply to any Project covered by this agreement. No member of the governing body of the Municipality o any tether public official of the Municipality who exercises nny responsibilities or functions with respect to any Project during his tenure or for one year thereafter shall have any interest, direct or indirect, In any Project or any property Included or planned to be Included In any project, or any contracts In connection with such Projects or property If any such governing body member or ouch other public official of the Municipality Involuntarily or had acquired prior to the beginning of his tenure any such interest, he shall Immediately disclose such interest to the Local Authority. So long as any contract between the local Authority and the Government for loans (including preliminary loans) or annual contributions, or both, in connection with any Project remains in force and effect, or so long as any bonds issued in connection with any Project or any monies due to the Government in connection with any Project remain unpaid, this Agreement shall not be abrurated, changed, or modif led without the consent of the Government. The privileges and obligations of the Municipality hereunder shall remain in fullforce and effect with respect to each Project so long an the beneficial title to such Project is held by the Local Authority or by any other public body or governmental agency, including the Government, authorized by law to engage in the development or adminsitratlon of law -rent housing projects If at any tine Lhe baicficlal title to, or possession of, any Project 1s held by such other public body or governmental agency, including the Goverment_, � 1 U 7/ • the provisions hereof shell insure to the benefit of and may be enforced by, ruch other public body or governmental agency, including the Government. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality and the Local Authotity have tespectavely signed this Agreement and caused their seals to be affixed ani attested as of the day and year first above written. Attest: lJ Attcst: 0 City Clerk Secretary City of Rancha Cucamonga gy; Mayor / City Attorney HOOFING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNT[ OF SPN BERNARDINO By: Chairman t� e ii, San Bernardino County Office of Community Development Informational Sheet PUBLIC HOUSING COOPERATION AGEEESIENT BACKGFOUND In early January the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued an advertisement indicating that funding was available for the construction of 319 two bedroom publlcally owned housing units in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. These units once construct- ed would be owned, maintained, and operated by the local Housing Authority and leased to lower income households. The San Bernardino County Housing Authority has filed an application for the currently available units which propcses construction on scattered sites within the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the County It is estimated that 8 -10 units will be construoted on each site To date specific sites have not been proposed The site selection process will be completed in cooperation with City staff COOPERATION AGREEMENT Prior to HUD approval of the current application, Cooperation Agree- ments must be executed between the Housing Authority and all local governmental jurisdictions where potential housing sites are located. In general, the Cooperation Agreement Indicates the City's support for public housing development. It should be noted that the Agree- ment covers not only the current application, but also would apply to future p.:tlic housing construction funds made available through HUD APPROVAL OF SELECTED SITES Once actual sites are selected, City Council approval in the form of a public hearing will be required This gill insure that each proposed site is acceptable for public housing development. dal/3/2/79 ID RE�UIREIIENIS�RELATING 1w aZ: 7TGN 3 Aau uitu.:c ASS TED HOUSING PROPOSALS A LOCAL REVIEW New construction or substantial rehaoilitation proposals for Section 8 or other federally assisted housing programs mast be submitted to HUD, FMHA or CHFA for review and approval by both the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors and the City Council in the participating cities For Section 8 proposals, the completed 213 form should be submitted for review Each proposal will be ranked in order to select these which best meet the Urban County'b goals and standards Each proposal shall be assigned numerical ratings on the basis of its ts relative to other proposals in its group All proposals with .perior" ranking overall will be consistent with this HAP Tht highest ranking Proposals totalling the amount of funding available in a given advertising or funding cycle will consistent with this HAP. All lover ranking proposals shall be incaatintent with this HAP Regardless of other proposals received any proposal ranked as "Unacceptable" overall will be incnasistent with this HAP Proposals shall be ranked with respect to tRe .ol owing sets of criteria a Site and neighborhood • b Design and concept c Owner /spotsor experience J Management capability e Equal opportunity f Conformance to local plans g Extent of use of local subcontractors (See attached review checklist) B SELECTION OF TENANTS 1 All private parties having a contract directly with NO for rev construction or substantial rehabilitat_on under Section 8 will oa required to give first priority to displaced persons and second priority, during the first 120 days of renting, to eligible applicants on the San Bernardino County Housing Authority waiting lists 2 Any qualified applicant on the County Housing Authority waiting list who is rejected for occupancy under provision B.1 may appeal to No unless all units of the appropriate size for which that applicant might qualify have been rented 3 Landlords /owners and their managers will advertise in minority areas and will conform to all equal opportunity laws when selzcticg tenants. 4 Landlord /owners and their managers will not discriminate with regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, cultural economic, or other social factors which place the individual in a disadvantaged position 134 I HOUSING PROPOSAT REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable box t and provide all information requested even if the proposal is found to be uoacceptable on the tasis of any single item or factor arm name pro3e.t num4r (use hOFA number if available) location of proposed project total no of units total no. of units to be assisted 213 revaev date A SITE AND NEIGHBORHOOD CRITERIA (This section may be de'eted if all proposals in group to be compared are for the same site, based upon a pre -site approval request ) 1 In relation to any adverse environmental conditions, natural or mannade (areas which strve natural ecological functions -- flood plains, wetlands, etc ), the site is: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The site is in one of the priority ateas for new construction/ substantial rehabilitation indicated on Table IV _ yes (5) _ no (0) 3 :he site's accessibility to public utilities (water and sever service to the site should be assessed for both accessiblility and capacity to serve the d:velopment) is: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 4 The site's cccesnibility to employment opportunities is: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 5 The site's accessibility to transpor,ation service i -: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) i �.� 136 • • C Y C MANAGEMENT I The County of San Bernardino requires that BUD administer coarracts with rivae compliance [with rthes established rules construction and requirements aOf the law slaw and for new of this plan. 2 Whenever possible, HUD should contract with the San Bernardino related to certification of to inconeet administer to provide omorehsubstantial control. 1 Management practices must protect the anonymity of Section g part - cipants D DESIGN All proposals for development of .amily and large family units containing 50 units or less on a single site will be given favorable consideration during the 213 Review Process Projects propoa ins a greater number of units per site will generally be considered ineo¢siste¢t with the Housing Assistance Plan Developers will be assisted and market rate runits iwithin ia given toporate a mix of developmenCy E OTHER ® 1 The County of San Bernardino and Participating cities are willing to accept "fair shard' of assisted housing as determined by the Areawide Housing Opportunity Plan 0 135 7b 3. The project's special amenities and unusual features are: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 4. The project contains a mix of subsidized and non - subsidized units or is part of a larger mixed development: yes (5) _ no (0) 5 The assisted part of the development contains 30 or fever units: yes (5) _ no (0) 6 If the project contains units for the elderly or handicapped, the project conforms to design standards devised to serve the elderly more efficiently yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SMM%RY OF DESIGN RATING (divide total points by 6). IN RELATION TO OTHER PROPOSALS, THE DESIGN CONCEPT IS: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) • C OWNER EXPFRUNCE CRITERIA 1 The developer, builder and /or owner's experience in the construction for the structural type proposed is: _ superior (5) good (3) _ fair (1) unacceptable (0) 2 The developer, builder and /or owner have acceptable experience in the development and /or construction of housing or in Lelated fields yes (5) _ no (0) 3 The developer, builder /owner s experience in the development/con- struction of projects at a scale comparable to that of the proposed project is: superiot (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: S10C41t(Y OF OWNER EXPEUENCE RATING (divide total points by 3) THE ABILITY OF TIM DEVELOPER, BUILDER /04NER AS DEMONSTRATED BY PAST PERFORMA.4CE IS: • _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 138 77 6 The site's accessibility to residential services (schools -- consider S impaction and saturation as well as access -- parks, commercial and retail shopping, d.y care facilities, recreational and cultural uppnr- tunities, municipal services: Fire, police, and health facilities) is: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) I Streets are r'ailable to service the site or provisions for public im- provements are acorporated within tie proposal. _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 8 The site's potential to promote greater choice of housing oppurtuntties and avoid undue concentration of assisted households in areas containing a high proportion of low income persons is: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) _ 9 In relation to required relocation assistance, the proposal is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 10 The project's consistency with local plans and plans of affected public agencies is: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SL%WY OF SITE AND NEIGHBORHOOD RATING (divide total points received by 10) IN RELATION TO OTHER PROPOSALS, THE SUITABILITY OF THE SITE FOR SUBSIDIZED HOUSING IS: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) B DESIGN CONCEPT CRITERIA 1 The land use planning and treatment of the proposed site based on local standards are: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The building layout and unit plans are: superior (5) _ gooJ (3) fair (1) l•_�uunnacceptable (0) 13: C r a TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SUICLIRY OF EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENTS (divide total points by 2) THE • POTENTIAL OF THE PROPOSAL FOR ACHIEVING EQUAL OPPORTUNITY OBJECTIVES RELATIVE TO OTHER PROPOSALS IS: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) a unacceptable (0) F CONSISTENCY WITH CITY PLANS 1 The proposal is for the type of construction given priority in the current year goals _ yes (5) _ no (0) 2 The proposal is fez "substantial rehabilitation" _ yes (5) _ no (0) 3 The proposal confo= to all applicable local plans and requirearonts yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: STOMY OF CONSISTENCY WITH CITY PLANS (divide total points by 3) • THE PROPOSAL'S CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL PLANS IS: superior (5) _ ;ood (3) fair (1) unacceptable (0) G USE OF LOCAL CONTRACTORS 1 The sponsor /developer agrees to use local subcontractors for all construction work _ yes (20) for some Jobs (5) not willing to provide written assurance (0) Additional cos:sents if appropriate OVERALL PROPOSAL POINTS: SUMMY RATING superior (5) _ good (3) fair (3) _ unacceptable (0) 140 77 D RMAGUMN'T CAPABILITY CRITERIA • Is The necessary experi,nice and /or qualifications of the owner to carry out project management and maintenance activities are: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) OR lb If the owner proposes to contract with a management agent to carry out management and maintenance responsibilities, such agent has the neces- sary experience or qualifications to carry out such responsiblities _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The proposal's conformance Lo the regulations regarding owner respon- sibilities for a management and a maintenance plan and utilities schedule is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 3 The manager will give first priority to displaced persons and second j priority, during the first 120 days of renting, to eligible applicants . on the San Bernardino County Housing Authority waiting lists yes (5) _ no (0) 4 The project will be contracted with the County Housing Authority to administer portions of the contract related to certifications of in- come, etc yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION Poins: smfmRy OF HA.NAGENEYI RATING (divide total poirts by 4) IN RELATION TO OTHER PROPOSALS, THE HANAGEHE.NT CAPABILITY IS: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) E EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIRESLSNPS 1 The owner /builder /developer is a signator to Areawide Affirmative Fair and Equal Housing Plans _ yes (5) _ no (0) 2 The project will be advertised in minority areas yes (5) _ no (0) tt i txt U V -- — -- - - — low a, T AFFIDAVIT OF PUELICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA } ss COUNTY OF SAN BERN iRDINO I i. nrnea Prnv do hembv certify that I am the Legal Advertising clerk of THE DAILY REPORT a dally newspaper of general circulation, Published In the City of Ontario. County and State aforesaid and that the attached advertisement .Jnr•r� CF pl)WLIC 'tr 1 ^T'Ir• 0'1 en,�nnSrt) of Cnnnr4,%Tl14 "r—r-I"' TtIF CITY n^ ^111 C'tn CItgA.ITtC� vIn Tnf uODgn'n Pt:'I• ^ni -v nF TISF CnI'J v r'r WI oCR:IA ^nl'In was publisheA in mid newspaper on, ♦trw orlr T to wit 'I'rCh ,7,In4n I tend) under penalty of perjury that the fomgo:ng Is true and correct (Signature) thr re•enth Dated at Ontario. California this -- day of 'ICrclt ^^ 10— V • MENTAL IMPROVEi:1ENT AGENCY - )s -, County of Son Bomordino OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT fOCDI 'zY° n ANN SIRACUSA 1111 fin NO Sheet • San 8m rdlno, CA 82415 • (713) 3912745 'SYi. February 12, 1979 Mr Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Box 793 - 7340 Basline AV - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr Wasserman: The Office of Co,;minity Development would like to schedule two agenda dates before your City Council to discuss a proposed Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County Housing Authority. In a recent housing advertisement, issued by the Department of dousing and Urban Development, 319 new public housing units were allocated to the Riverside - San Bernardino Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SILA). • The Housing Authority of San Bernardino County is currently preoaring an applicatioi for approximately 155 or these units to be located an scattered site; throughout the County. To date, specific sites have not Sean .elected. Is As part of the formal application, Cooperation Agreements must be negotiated between the HoLsing Authority and all local governmental jurisdictions where Proposed sites are located. In this light, agreements will be requested from all Co=unity Development cooperating cities, as well as the County Boaru of Supervfsors Enclosed are backup materials for the proposed Cooperation Agreement including, a sample agreement, resolution for public hearing, etc Since there am Lire constraints involved in the submittal of a formal application to HUD, tl Office of Cermunity Development requests your assistance in scheduling time or the Cfty Caur -il agenda to authorize and conduct a public hearing in regard to the Prop.- -d agracncnt it should be noted that at least two agenda dates w 11 be rr.,uired One date to authorize notice of a public hearing, and the second date, at least telo weeks later, to hold the actual hearing. Page 1 NO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1919 TO: City Council d City Manager FROM: Lloyd Mubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: GRANT . S BUREAU COFORECLAMATDRAIN O IGRANT AND LOAN PROGRAM For the past few months, the Engineering Division has been discussing with d Chino Basin King EnglneeNlng, Coe n sPotential0forrobtainingFgrantCandrloani fundstfrom theD Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of storm drains throughout the gem Valle areaeand withctioneoCi B million dollars fast storm drains lin- cluding S million to o'v City- Drains selcted for charge andeterutnatefat reu arge basins. to lncludedbare the sBeryl- RedrHill These drains are Eighth and 8 Strern the Ctty�sRCUrrrntaprio rityhfundingtlist area (See attached map ) Bureau of Reclamation These Projects are proposed for fundin3 under the "Loans Under the Small Reclamation Protects Act of 1956• The program is part grant part loan, depending on formula evaluation developed through the application process Best guess is 50% grant and 505 loan could be attained for this project Loans are for 40 years or less at about 6% interest. bytnetBureauvaid iThn CorDSnofuEngineers foPreliminaryldiscussion have beenned and Lwi0h King Indication of Reclamatithese Chino gssseemapositivee ndtthe Bureau ct has encouraged the agcncies to proceed to develop a Notice to Intent to apply RowleyanSecretary Manager described in nseevationeDistrict, the tnext �step rinEt est process involves the camtttment of 52,000 by each City in in the program to pay the consultant for preparation of the Notice of Intent. These funds will be supplemented with $6,000 from the Conservation District At this time, it appears that if sufficient interest is demonstrated on the cities that the and invite an theifotiieof Intent review. the Bureau will make findings and GRANT FUNDING FOR STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION July 5, 1979 Page 2 i At that time, the precise project will be known and grant -loan proportions determined The cities will then be faced with the following issues: 1 Construction scheduling 2. Proportionate share of funding for application processes (estinated cost SIDO.000 to $300,000) and construction 3. Contractural arrangements between each agency and the Flood Control District 4. Funds comnittcent for loan payback S. Legal cemnittments for funds under Proposition 13 6 Whether the program would be of overall benefit to the City CONCLUSION The Engineering Division has worked closely with all the involved agencies on this project and feel that the proposed investment in relation to potential - gain is sufficient to warrant a comeittment on the part of th7 City of $2,000 to further explore the project. There are questions remaini,ig as to the ap- plicability of the funding program to the proposed project and inter- agency coordination will be difficult if a grant is obtained. The only method of answering many of these questions is to take the first step to obtain a better assessment. On the issue of inter- agency coordination, it should be • pointed out that the City cannot legally apply for this program by Itself. Federal and State law require a regional "subdivision of the State" to make application For this reason., it is proposed that Flood Control District will act as lead agency At this time, the District has not fully consented to act to the role of lead agency and has requested that the cities review the program to obtain Counc41 approval of the $2,000 allocation At the time each agency has com- mitted, the District and Board of Supervisors will review the program and prepare the necessary agreements To date, none of the cities has committed for funding. RECGMMENDATION It is recoanonded that the City Council approve participation in the proposed grant program and allocate $2,000 from Storm Drain fee's for the Preparation of a Notice of Intent to apply Disbursement of said funds to be approved by the City Council at time of execution of agreements with the County Flood Control District -Respectfully suLAjtted, ✓`r Lloyd Yfubbs City Engineer LH:deb 0 ,ae , NJ c � 01hQo Q• pt� , , 'HJ dVU • I • I K 1 k` � ?t / r• / ; � C I Q O � �II � I / o o NJ dual 2 Cl JC ILJO SZ'70 s 1 •' N ' .09 o i,�. fZ 70 • w a p w w "-w-w '��^ � V H N Xfr w.V�� itTi .I.I ., `. �A'33X7 i� r33o �9L•70 . � °d ` t3 7 q r uo • � �'�`e .I el Q 1� I V �� Q I ••o R s '�'' ' bf ll• .1 � � �• 1 Z T � � inn' 7 i h a • I y k. :=i 1+ =t i7 re Pl XI ham,' N rr "1 I ! V bJ� Sa yj 'o p •y p tic \per , 1. � • ! r. .• �o / 7v � • Fi: i F • � ' u+ z � tz n0` Z a. V •� � V � l• V ' �, n ' V_ \ IN \N• f \ Vi iL *j,. M M � '` Q Q. 1 •b Q W Q� . 4••• �3� � i Zt e V Q0 Jp v J c j Z T o n Wr • `� 0 � ¢ � i n N � g c .ice \ �� � ��� S b Z El El STORtl DRAIN PRIORITIES Estimated Cost 1. Storm Drain Master Plan Update (Phased) S 75,060 2. Day - Etiwanda - San Sevaine System 25.000 3. Carnelian Channel 500,000 4 Red dill - Beryl Storm Drain - Project 2a -2b 1,600.000 5 19th Street Storm Drain - Projt-• 4b 500,000 6. Baseline Storm Drain - Project 4e 1.000,00a 7. 8th Street Storm Drain - Project 5d 11500,000 B. Hellman Avenue Storm Drain - Project 6a 2.250,000 9. Arrow Route Storm Drain - Project Sc 1,300,000 10. Foothill- Turner Stoma Drain - Project Se 1.000.000 TOTAL S 9,750,000 Funding for each project will be phased to provide optimum construction scheduling and potential for capture of grant funding I DIRECTORS M ERIC r"'.20" / [•mU .. roO" . , M.OLE) c MU[[[. . eu a SAWSMS ..... r , JR. ..lrM ,rvno[ CHINO BASIN NVATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT om ac oMirno 4590 San Bernardino Street • dfontelair Cablornia 91769 M(MII� / .euNA P. O. Box 7177 Phone 714 646.1711 A wNI 1 c / /IeKRIS eRs M.WIO MUUeN " Ule fC /[T[P<ON IOWf O t.00[a Come"u ` " "[n `.owl[r June 27, 1979 DISTRICT COUNSEL C A e(MCMUx PRELIMINARY DRAFT FEW TO West End Directors of Public Works /City Engineers SUBJECT• Possible Storm Flow Protection and Water Reclamation project u S Bureau of Reclamation Grant and Loan program Ladies and Gentlemen + During the past few weeks, we have discussed a potential project that would utilize a Bureau Grant and Loan Program to construct storm drains and storm flow reclamation facilities. I wish to inform you of my latest activities and discussions and to request a more formal statement of Interest on the part of Cities in pursuing this project. Our review of grant and loan procedures with Bureau staff indicates the program will involve a substantial amount of "red tape ". The Corps of Engineers will review flood protection cost benefits and several depart- ments of the Bureau will have application review input It occurred to us that these processing issues might better be coordinated by a local agency that has a number of experienced staff members We then decided to discuss the program with Supervisors Townsend and McElwain End S3n F,ernardino County Flood Control District staff District staff is experienced in dealing with the Corps and several of the proposed storm drains tie to existing District facilities We met with the Supervisors and Mr Dino D1Pietro. Flood Control Engineer, on June 12th It was agreed that city interests should be firmed and that a Flood control staff report would be prepared and presented to the Board of Supervisors at an early date. ffl 6t . Maw io June 27, )979 Page two The suggested next step would be far esrh Interested Lity W ccMit to fund tent t and to request that the Flood Canayt District file a accIee S6.000efro,n thepCon Conservation District Cities' money, together Pitt presently drafted, to make add;ttaneT' would be used to refine the i0., Of quantities of storm flaw to t1 rccTareMfmf�� 9imming evalaatimcs potential Projects within each City's jurisdfctfan. ImPAI. a list of BOr"a funds caaattted new would be uzar pay �` In ad,ftiom, the fil!aq to obtain a preliminary Bond Cm�n ctl opinion of the la cu light of Proryositton 13. Each City would select projects to Itc area that thxy feel a oef:�le in pursuing, assuming a future Taan rePalmertt r�Gcnsibilit7r. L. &L will King, Inc., staff notice assist in cocgr6lfng the lfst of patar'fal perdects and draft the notice of intent to apply for Bureau,Furrdirg, This infsc_ motion would then be used by Flood CorrtroT staff to a Presertattara to the Board of Supervisors. Mr. ProbableothatatEDA study funds twill June fond ih�r� �t work leading to a loan -grant cmmsitment from ire eto fa (�, is row they�couTd advanrl.eefund200.Mo for this pu posc. 1f repayment is assured by this EDA program. C=T-'Y People farfca'a& Y cash fFow• segofrom rr= O It is requested that you review the potential prrgrmr with yoar Cfty Councils and report your tntcrests to us by early duTy. PTrase call If J can assist s. further describing the program: or if E c.eo s.,,. s_ aN' Prezentaitans. Sincerely, ERIEST E. ROWLEY Secretary - manager CJF: sw DISTRiBUJ. m: Supervisor -„rnsend Supervisor McElwain Carl Sawtell, City of Montclair Rosalind Daniels. City of or tar{o chD FreddBiancha rd, tCity OfnUPlana np Ray Wellington, City of China Dino OiPietro, San Bernardino County Frank Coony, San 0 CardinpiCDistrict Carl Freeman, L D.iPt g,eInc. Agency 170 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council E City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Bill Holley, Director of Community Services SUBJECT- LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS Attached for Council review is preliminary information developed for the proposed formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Lighting District No 1 Attached are the list of the tracts to be included, the procedures for establishing the District under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, preliminary cost data for maintenance of the District and pertinent correspondence with the Planning Commission and Ar '-my Committees. The tracts to be included in these Districts were chosen because they have not yet left the control of the developer and remain as me ownership This fact will facilitate the formation process • The attached memo on cost describes those methods of cost distribution throughout the District and gives samples of typical costs under each option This information was reviewed by the Citizen's Advisory Committees, who recommended a two phased approach. The Committees were strongly in favor of developing a parkway maintenance program, but felt that the program should be Citywide with approval of the taxing authority by ballot measure Prior to this action, the combined maintenance district for the recommended tracts was approved This is the Plan 2 option described in the attached memo from Mr. Holley The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its June 13, 1979 meeting and requested the additional information provided in the attached June 27 memo The Commission shared the concern of the Advisory Committees and supported a Citywide maintenance concept Tht Planning Commission will again review this matter at its July 2 meeting and should have a recommendation for Council at the time of the Council meeting ISSUES AhD ALTERNATIVE A great deal of concern has been voiced throughout the Community on the state of parkway maintenance. To date, the City has not been in a position to pro- vide any maintenance on either improved or unimproved parkway areas The City Council through this years budget has committed substantial resources to deal ® with this problem. 91 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS • July S. 1979 Page 2 The magnitude of this committment wilt have to be increased as the mileage of Boulevard itreatmentsswill increases with islandp ;andscapingdandiadditional maintenance burdens. The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway maintenance General Funds Establishment of Maintenance Districts through development and annexation. Development of Citywide tax or maintenance of parkways - requires election Do not maintain landscaped parkways At the current time, arterial landscaping has been required of all tract development. With the abolishment of Improvement Zone A and Street Lighting District No. 1. no means exists to maintain these improvements. The proposed District would replace these mechanism and allow improvements to be self annexations aALitywidetDistrict will Dhopefullywbe attained and with other until staff assufficientnplannt geandtmaintenace experience has program developed to demonstrate the total benefit to the general public The pro- aontrtwill allow tiec ae improvements provide oemoaionof thebenefisofthemaintennnceand improvement of he parkway environment. REC011HENDATION It is recommended that the City Council instruct staff to begin proceedings for the formation of Landscape and Lighting District No. 1. These districts 1 to encompass the tracts identified in the attached list with cost distributions on a per lot basis for the full district for landscaping and cost distributions on lot basis per tract for lighting _ J 0 c/ LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOUTATIUN PROCEDURES Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 1 Determination of Need for a District The Community Development Department will detr:rmine the need for maintenance districts on tentative tracts that have backup and side -on lots to the peri- phery of the tract. 2. Notification of Property Comers All effective property owners will be notified of the Council hearing and in- tention to form the district 3. Preparation of the Resolution of Intention The Department will prepare a Resolution of Intention for City Council approval. 4. Preparation of District Yap The Engineering Division shall prepare a map showing the boundaries of the District, the lots to be assessed, and the relationship of the final tra•-t to the overall street pattern. S. Adoption of the Resolution of Intention The City Council will adopt the Resolution of Intention, setting a time and place for hearing protest against the District. The time and date for hear- ing protest mutt be set at least 10 days after the date of the Resolution of Intention 6. Posting Notice of Improvement The Engineering Division will prepare a Notice of Improvement The Engineer- ing Jivision will post this notice at intervals of not more than 300 feet along all streets within the proposed district. (At least three notices oust be posted ; The posting oust occur at least ten days prior to the time of the hearing of protests. 7 Publication of Notice of Improvement The City Clerk will publish the Notice of Improvement in the Ontario Daily Report and will obtain proof of publication. The notice must be published once, at least ten days prior to the time and date for hearing protest D. Nailing Notice of Improvement ® The City Clerk will mail notices to all property owners within the District ten days prior to the date of hearing. IF3 9 Cost Estimate The Community Services Department will make an estimate of costs for the Distr ct, including maintenance, water, administration and vandalism. 10. Engineer's Report The Engineering Division will prepare a report showing: a. Plans and specifications of the maintenance b. An estimate of the cost of maintenance (same as (a) above) c. A diagram of the assessment distri -t d An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance 11. Protests The City Clerk will receive protests and forward them to the Community Development Department. The Department will prepare resolutions over- ruling the written protests. _ 12 Resolution Ordering the Formation The Community Development Department will prepare a resolution ordering the formation of the District A -eport discussing the District and pro- test will be prepared at this time. • 13 Agenda for Hearing Protest The City Clerk will prepare an agenda for all protests received and will note on the agenda that protests may be received uo to the hour of the mseting and that those protests received after the preparation of the agenda shall be heard to the order of submission. 14. Hearing and Protests The City Council will hold a hearing of objections The hearing will pro- ceed in accordance with the agenda. 15. Filing the Resolution The City Clerk will file a certified copy of the resolution ordering forma- tion of the Maintenance District in the Office of the County Assessor. 16 Tax Rate The tax rate shall be determined by the Department of Finance. 17. Adoption of Tax Rate The City Council will adopt a budget and tax rate for the Maintenance District. 18. Submission of Tax Rate The Finance Department will submit tax rate to the County Tax Collector no later than August 15 of the budget year. The Tax Collector prefers the tax rate to be submitted in July. q, / s STREET LENGTH SQUARE FEET Tract 9351 - Hark III Homes, inc. Sapphire 565 x 10y 5,933 63 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue D Costa Itesa, CA 92626 r Tract 9225 - Lesny Development Company F 69 Lots 447 South Fairfax Avenue Carnelian 673 x 5 3,365 :i Los Angeles, CA 90036 Tract 9306 - Halton Construction Corporation Archibald 1307 x 13$ 17,645 48 Lots 511 Hest Citrus Edge ' P 0. Box 775 Glendora, CA 91740 , a Tract 9269 - Mark III Homes. Inc. Wilson 1379 x llh 15,859 53 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Archibald 971 x 135 13,109 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 I Tract 9268 - hark III Homes, Inc. Archibald 721 x 1315 9,734 53 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Amethyst 810 x 1% 8,505 Costa Itesa, CA 92626 - Tract 9267 - Mark III Homes, Inc. Archibald 826 x 13y 51 28 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 • Tract 9444 - Mark III Homes, inc. 20 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tract 9445 - Mark III Homes, Inc. Archibald 2140 x 12 25,680 61 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Wilson 665 x 10 6,650 Costa Ilesa, CA 92626 Tract 9440 - Chevron Construction Hermosa 1138 x 10 11,380 45 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90403 Tract 9423 - Coral Investment, Inc. 23 Lots 540 South Pasadena Avenua Glendora, CA 91740 Tract 9434 - Chevron Construction 19th Stree' 603 x 5 3,015 32 lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90403 Tract 9430 - R. L Selvers b Sons, Inc. Wilson 1160 x 11 12,760 29 Lots 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B Haven 617 x 10 4,420 Buena Park, CA 90620 s MV 1 F] STREET LENGTH SpUARE FEET Tract 9436 - Chevron Construction Walnut 733 x 10 7,330 27 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Haven 442 x 10 4,420 Santa Honica, CA 90403 Tract 9437 - Chevron Construction Walnut 1310 x 10 13,100 28 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa lionica, CA 90403 Tract 9454 - Lewis Homes of California Haven 514 x 12 6,165 59 Lots 1156 r1wh Mountain Avenue P. 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Tract 9387 - The Jones Company Hermosa 110 x 5 550 56 Lots 10945 South Street P 0. Box 1178 Cerritos, CA 90701 Tract 9637 - Chevron Construction 31 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90403 Tract 9638 - Chevron Construction Archibald 827 x 5 4,175 25 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Honlea, CA 90403 Tract 9567 - Travis L. Nanning Hermosa 494 x 10 4,940 33 Lots 2110 Hacienda Boulevard • Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Tract 9402 - Olympus Pacific Corporation Leman 977 x Sy 5,374 46 Lots 2110 East Katella Avenue Anaheim, CA 92803 Tract 9403 - Olympus Pacific Corporation 43 Lots 2110 East Katella Avenue Anaheim, CA 92803 Tract 9480 - Kaufman d Broad Homes, Inc. Baseline 430 x 15 6,450 54 Lots 18902 Bardeen Hay Irvine, CA 92715 Tract 9472 - Boulevard Development 19th Street 528 x 6 3,167 60 Lots 778 South Main Street, Suite 106 Orange, CA 92688 F] 0 H E M 0 R A 11 D U M Date: I•lay 1, 1979 To: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Landscape Maintenance District No 1 Find attached cost information, based on current City of Ontario figures, relating to landscape maintenance districts District operations cost i; rer square toot, per year a) Dater .. .$0 040 b) Vandalism and repair 0 015 c) Equipment 0 028 d) Labor 0D—R3 2) Other a) Electrical, per meter, per year 39 60 b) Inspections, per tract, per year 168 00 Methods of c wa assessin cost ere are t ree as ys of funding a Maintenance District, such as we propose: 1) Each tract is a d.strict; 2) All tracts are part of the same district; and 3) The whole City is the district An examination of the assessment levied against each homeowner using "plan 1" in sample tracts 9351, 9269, and 9387, and using the projected cost figures above, yields the following: 9351 per home, per year $37 48* 9269 per home, per year 202 32* 9387 per home, per year 13 54* Using "plan 2" the homeowner in Maintenance District No 1 would share equally the cost of maintaining the entire district. With the 25 tracts in No 1, cost to each residence would be $75 37 per year Plan three, while the correct solution (I continue to hold the minority view) is not politically feasible, and further exploration into it will not be made at this time *The cost assumes that only one electrical meter per tract is used, and this is not generally the case in larger develop- ments (?7 :t Lloyd, we obviously have a serious Problem The cost to each homeowner is too high under plan 2' and financially out of . the question in several instances using "plan 1" We are goin¢ to have to address cost reduction methods through "hardscaping some existing areas, utilizing beautification fees, and better control of "financially excessive greenery" imposed in planning requirements We must move quickly on this and get a policy set. PHA cc: Lauren Wasserman sS CITY OF RANCHO CUV.MOI1GA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FROM Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Bill Holley, Director of Community Se-i ices SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS At it's June 13, 1979 meting, the Planning Commission reviewed the establishment of Landscape maintenance District No. 1 to include new tracts currently to various stages of construction or review. These tracts previously agreed to the establishment and maintenance of park- ways as a condition of approval. _ At this meeting, the Commissioners indicated that they would like further Information on the following issues: 1 Cost of maintenance of all parkways Citywide on a per lot basis. • 2 Uses for beautification funds versus maintenance district funds. 3 Methods available for annexation to the District CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE The staff is not able at this time to Precisely define •he ove all raintenace cost for a Citywide program because of the uncertai:cy • oarkway development, parkway development standards and the lack of a complete inventory of the parkways to be maintained. The staff is currently working on standards for parkway development making use of more exten.ive handscape elements to reduce planting and maintenance costs. It is expected that maintenance costs under the revised standards will be much lower than tl.e historical costs developed to date. Utilizing the current information and Ith a brief inventory of remaining parkways, it is estimated that per lot .urges Citywide would range from $50 to $60 per lot per year This is a sl' it reduction over the limited program proposed under Landscape District No 1 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS Parkways within the City fall into three categories: 1 Improved parkways adjacent to existing tracts - not maintained 2. Parkes,,; abutting undeveloped land - to be developed 3 Undeveloped parkways adjacent to existing tracts. .0 �� ITEM "J" Y LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 27, 1979 Page 2 Beautification fees were developed to provide a funding source for the development of category 3, undeveloped parkways adjacent to existing tracts, and for development of special boulevards. These funds were not intended to cover maintenance cost The Beautification fees are not a predictable source of revenue and depend on the level of resi- dential developent within the City, tecause they will vary from year to year they will be used exclusively for construction. MAINTENANCE FUNDING No funds currently exist for the maintenance of parkway improvements and many improved parkways are currently being lost because of lack of care. Without development of future sources of revenue for maintenance, future tract improvements will also be lost. ANNEXATION TO DISTRICT 0 Included within the June 13, 1979 Council packet, was a detailed procedure for the establishment of Landscape and Lighting Districts This is the same procedure to be used in annexation to the Maintenann. District It is the intention of the staff to aggressively pursue District Annexations . when Landscape District No 1 has been completed Approval of these an- nexations will be difficult to obtain where the majority of the residents object to the District formation. ALTERNATIVES The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway oaintenance: 1 Maintained from general funds. 2 Establishment of Maintenance Districts through phased development and annexation 3 Development of Citywide tax for maintenance of parkways - requires election 4. Do not maintain landscaped parkways. Parkway maintenance cost will expand as development continues making funding with general funds impossible without sacrifice of other City services. Establishment of a Citywide tax should be pursued through election as soon as the parkway beautification program has been established. As a incremental step at implementing Citywide maintenance district. Alter- native 2 should be implemented to prevent loss of current capital investments. If none of the above are accomplished, parkways in the City will not be maintained 166 0 °❑ LANDSCAPE WAINTENANCE DISTRICTS June 27, 1979 Page 2 CONCLUSION It Is recommended that the City establish Landscape and Lighting Districts as proposed for the follortng reasons: 1 Without funds to maintain existing and planned landscaping, the current investment will be lost. 2. The established district will supply a living model of the Main- tenance District program to encourage other areas of the City to join. 3 The Districts will allow experimentation to establish precise maintenance cost and to develop cust effective maintenance programs REMIENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend the establishment of Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 as one encompassing district with costs distributed on a per lot basis. (V Chairman Reepel asked for questions from the Commission of the Staff. Caccissioner Carcia indicated he rersonally does not see any problems with the time • and temperature sign. It Is a nice looking sign which is to be surrounded )y a well landscaped area and will be a nice addition to the center. Comissioner Tolstoy asked if there will be any visibility problems if the sign to located in this area. Hr Hogan stated no, the sign will be set back approximately 62 feet from Baseline and will provide wore than adequate visibility. A Motion was Dade by Gttnlsslonir Carcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to approve Director Review Signs No. 79 -02 as submitted. AYES: GARCIA. TOLSTOY, JONES, REMEL NOES: NONE ABSE.`rr: DAHL a a a a a Hr Lan asked that the Commissloa move to Itm "H" at tills time and that Itm "G" be reviewed at such time Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, is in attendance. A Notion was made by Commissioner Garcia, seconded ty Commissioner Tolstoy and unanimously carried to review Itm "H ". REPORT REGARDING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Bill Holley. Director of Cocmuniry Services, -avloved the staff report in detail, this being on file In the Planning Division. Staff recoaends that the Coemissfon recommend the establishment of Iandscape Maintenance District No. 1 as one encompassing district with cost distributed on a per lot basis. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the fees are set for landscape maintenance dis- tricts. City Attorney indicated each year the City Council holds a public hearing to set the fees and anyone objecting to the fees has the right to protest. Commissioner Garcia stated the concept of la,dscap maintenance districts to progressive for the City. What he would like to see is the development of a plan that would ultimately include the entire city within a landscape mialn- cenance district. He would lire to see the city broken down into zones and each zone h.ve a district. Chairman Rempel stated he sees potential problems with this proposal me it stands. It is his opinion that alternatives should be mentioned Loch as 1) a vote of the people within the city, 2) ways of annexation, 3) ways of deannexati., Hr Holley stated staff is asking for Commission recomeulation for the establish- ment of a landscape maintenance district. This Is the first step and the City can build from there. The City also shares the aims concern with the establishment of a street lighting district. Staff would like to know If the Comission an par to this concept to build from as a first step. Planning Commission Minutes -7- W June 13, 1979 • Commissioner Tolstoy indicated this is a step in the right direction for the City. Chairman Hempel stated that it should be made clear which streets will be main- tained under the district to avoid confusion. Commissioner Garcia stated he supports the concept of parkway maintenance. •� However further study to needed as to what the program is actually going to entail. He would also like to know the parameters and boundaries of the plan and whether or not the entire City will eventually be included. Hr Lam indicated the boundary for the landscape maintenance dietricc is the current city limits. Areas of the City are not proposed at chin time to be i•} sectioned off. Any tract that wants to be included in the district can do so. Staff needs to know whether or not the Commission and Council support this concept before the details of the program are developed. Chairman Hempel stated alternative types of fundings needs further ezamiaation !i to reflect an estimated future total for the entire city. i A Motion was made by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to approve the concept of a landscape maintenance district and a street lighting district with a more detailed report to cone back to the Commission for review In the near future. AYES: JONES, TOLSTOY, GARCIA, HEHPEL .NOES: NONE ABSENT: DAHL GENERAL PLAN MENLr1ENf - CIRCULITIGH ELLMENT INDUSTRIAL AREA Me Lam stated this report is for information purposes only. The Issues raised by the Comalssion that are not answered tonight will be fully addressed at the time of the public hearing Hr Paul Rougeau, Assistant Civil Engineer, reviewed the sta.f report and the Consultants Reporto in detail, these being on file in the Planning Division. Staff remmmands that the Commission receive and file the Consultants report and schedule hearings for Amendment of the General Plan Circulation Elemtnt for June 27, 1979. Hr Morin stated there wuld be awe concern from the property owners near Rochester If 6th Street were to go through and curve through their properties as it would limit use of their properties. Chaiman Rompal wondered if there are portions of 7th Street going east frw Archibald that need to cirry through. Hr Dilorto stated the area between 7ch and 8th Streets seems to be attractive for large scale dtatribution centers which shuuld take up the entire area. This would make it Impossible to bring 7th Street through His only concern Planning Commission Minute* -g- June 17, 1979 M3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA MEMUR NDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council E City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC STRIPE SFRYICES Presently, traffic striping services for both new work and refreshing of existing markings is being done by County crews under the City's annual maintenance contract. Because of the size ur the County and the resultant conflicts in priorities, response to requests for striping have not been satisfactory. The Engineering Division has obtained proposals from three contractors for the performance of striping services These contractors now do similar work for cities in San Bernardino, Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Analysis of the bids indicated that the firm of Safety Striping in Anaheim •` is la: bidder. This firm offers particularly good prices on certain strip- ing items comprising the bulk of our City's needs. Safety Striping contracts with the cities of Chino and Fontana as well as many Orange County cities Chino has used the firm's services since 1963 and reports very good perform- ance and response time. It is estimated that our City's striping maintenance cost will amount to $28,000 per year, allowing for same heavy wear areas to be restriped more than once a year. All costs of a striping contract would be costs which vould not be incurred under the annual maintenance contract with San Bern- ardino County and thus are not new costs. The following is a summary of the : -,d prices of major items and the quantities of striping requiring maintenance .. the City: lDq COST EACH OR COST PER L1 N. FOOT Bash Dou c vFS Cross Firm Stripe Stripe Letters Painting Walks Safety Striping, Irc. .022 /ft .134 /ft 2.12 ea .155 /ft .21 1ft Cote -Mark, Inc. .08 /ft .30 /ft 4 50 ea - - -- -- .30 /ft Consley d Montigny 045 /ft 14 /ft 5.00 ea .30 /ft .50 /ft lDq CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC STRIPE SERVICES July 5, 1979 Page 2 Basic Striping Quantities in Rancho Cucanwnga Cash stripe 261,500 Lin, ft Double stripe 105,000 Lin ft Letters, %- walks, etc. 29,000 Sol ft. RECOMMENDATION It is recor mnded that a contract be negotiated, based on the quoted prices, with Safety Striping Services. Inc. for 1979 -80. Respectfully su itted, hb y L s City Engineer LH:deb )b5 0 0 0 G "I .q •M ��IAFETY SllIPIA@ Ipoos.sza.t :ca i1LLmons CAL,rO11h1A e3D13 r ^sm•r•u B:r QYI FOUR INCH CIMERLINE OR LA14E LIHM PLR LINIAL M/r PI:.IU P1 IDITITE Fdge Line ..................... .. f 0(, S C6S4 Awoken Line (white 6 yellow) ........................ O19 017. Solid Line (white 6 yellow) ........................ 0f9 •C GA Double Solid Line ........................ .,L4 .,3 >' 8" (inch) Solid tine ........................ .I IIR ,relining ..... .................. .03 .09J le ,hcll SsL,d LIMB OSq .iTEMIL3 All 71ght Foot letters .............. ......... f f 43 f.i 12 -fait Pere ?XQ�Q Fr ........................ IIf , }1 "FEA" Complete both sides track ... ................... af9 00 ?,too "Wei One aide only ........................ aq ,'C M s U COIe,RLTE CURB PAINTING AND ASPHALT BMU All Colors ................. ... .. f IS:i f . ?U • PAFKING W Megosal Narking3- iseluding layout ........ .... .. . .... S I.0 Perking T's ................. ...... . 7J CF0.ISeA1yv 12" PER SQUARE FOOT ........................ f IV S .21 ARPWS State size for turn pockets ................ .. .... S 3.JU SI/0 wrong day Arrows ....................... rJMLL CTEICILS 18 inch ...................... . S fY/j SO 3 inch .................... ... BLACKOUT M SQUARE FOOT ............. ........ . f 1? b SANDBLASTING. Per square foot with no Pickup of aani ................... S • �(J The atone prices include all coots to you. HIrHf_T 4;:A7:Il FAINT, LADIP AHD GUARANTEED PjMRHA1KiE. All pointing i. done to State rrec:ficatinns 03 to size of stencil• spacing end q.u,ntities of Saint. Materials �, ed exceed State specifications. 166 COTE MAI {K INC fIR '.I LMU,t M.MI • O DOL 21 67 COM"C,. 4L1IMNIA 00222 June 6th, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Rougenu Gentlemen: The following is a list of price's for paint striping stroot s within your Oity. • Solid yellow or white • Skip yellou or white 8" Solid White 12" Solid Yellow or white 4" Double yellow 4" One way barrier stripe Layout Sandblast removal— lin.ft. 4* Sandblast romovcal — sq.ft. Legonda 9+ Arrow) Legonda Latter) 0.10 per lin.ft. 0.08 per lin.ft. 0.20 per lin.ft. 0.30 per lin.ft. 0.30 per lin.ft. 0,30 per lin.ft. 0.06 pLr lin.ft. 0.25 Per lin.ft. 0.70 per sq.ft. 07.50 each 04.50 each M ' Uf Ism LJ • >i.t•Y i••Vt -�4,�- V 'n. The above prices are based on the toll owing,n minimum days work 0680.00.Travel per move in 0141.00. The material used wfll be J.b. Dauer or Pervo. Billing will be submitted the last day of each mono+ payment to be ten days after rcccipt of billing. If ynu have any futher questions plonso call. L k P Sln e 'y i 1 l•F I+;•r!f4 1I i /.6'. ^.I . `y l4al. d:lh C'FN C� {;luf DFPi. Robert D. Gti ey fMi � ii] Z tg,nF�FI!]l'Fl t::]9F 1 t9]G s M7 r rnr :bro 101 SII,IYro . Clur,.0 a IINONI MA.e]]] 1 r� ' vnrtn wu.m • rrrcear eor,esne • rrrr sanpArn MMV111 11 ✓! 'll NIRImA)s nAVGS. OF rllr ^6&5T 1•rllrrl SFOr% f T1+CINCCCINS. OESICN, GIP 11:(1A11A110H r N]I,yr11 {ybs Aw IIrMwN ,+.•IwW ^Vll t T 1]13)443:!016 @111731 V.,1 T • 1..(7 1 •? __ i:5�'�_�]K(1NCIl:, Lu1111. a]f: !rt -- KANC�7n l_s.CCFln�OMJr{F �rl `lI'l.•il ,mn+ CA"N ON COMMIrnON. uMUte mMMIS ArtrtA"fru {M nAn• rr•+ z ) STATE CONTCACIOQ IICCHSC f10 7939SS 'i I r 111. 'I • iA. '1. lo. 11. 12. 43 51<.p `/ell,., or LDouble' /yellro, - Double ye.ffo", IUVWQI/ lei I lutr] 8" i,A,t 12." Cross onilc I.Ne or S4,.p 1,Ar f l Sf „ ol.j 4 V r rleffers � Orrp WS 31Aek out 4„ I,AIe Curb aAiA,i,tQ 1Rxp SlINS co Alpinic iP• Ark.m.2 7'S 3or4" Icitus wc{ snadnln_,i • 'M- r]ifluor '(M. lvi, ' L,f ,.I n u c].IS n.I•T I.,,. ;�1 I, .il. Lr] f l P I.,, ost L,f ,.I n u c].IS L.v.:f•. I, .il. lr:r l _ O• �h L,f ,.I n u l.•i PI. - 0.0 J lr:r l o I �, •' n 'i5 r-r .:0. "f � RVii f >. I r <<:, f4 RESOLUTION NO 79- 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COK41SSION FOR EXPENSES INCURRED WHILE SERVING AS MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION WHEREAS, the General Law of the State of California provides that a city planning commission may be dppointed for the purpose of administering both City and State laws relating to planning, zoning, and land use, and WHEREAS, members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission devote substantial time and effort on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and WHEREAS, Planning Commissioners are required as a Dart of their responsibilities to make on -site inspections of properties which will be Qis= cussed at future Planning Commission meetings, and WHEREAS, as a result of these inspections, members of the Planning Commission routinely incur certain expenses related to the use of their • personal vehicles and to the performance of their official duties for the City, and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that Planning Commissioners receive some reimbursement for expenses related to the discharge of their official duties. NOW. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that members of the Planning Commission shall receive the sum of twenty -five dollars (S25 00) per meeting, not to exceed fifty dollars (S50.00) per month to offset a portion of the expenses incurred 01le serving as members of the Planning Commission. 0 ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of July, 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT' city Lierk / b James C Frost Mayor ^y0, PANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL PRO?4e RENEE LOVATO, AREA COORDINATOR REs REVENUE SHARING DATE, JULY 5, 1979 VEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OFFICE ON AGING /SR. I @R I The Office on Aging, Svn Bernardino County's Area Agency on Aging, provides a number of services for the senior citizens of the West End. Information to Referral is provided both at our office. located in Ontario and at various Senior Nutrition sites, including the site located in Rancho Cucamonga. Additionally, the role of advocacy for the interests of area senior citiz ., is provided by this office. In raspons, to the request of agencies representing the needs of seniors of Rancho Cucamonga to appear at this evenings public hearing, I am going to present some obsarvations and suggestions for the allocation of Revenue Sharing Funds. These will be geared in the interest of the over 5,000 senior citizens of this city. 1 o .. • - . ) Transoortation was recently improved in the city with the operation of dial -a -ride which is greatly utilized by senior citizens. A note should be rade regarding bus transportation. Routs 14, which is the county -aide bas route, passes through the limits of Rancho Cucamonga. .his route providea nccess to the many facilities required of the elderly, dioibled and sicY. For this reason, *he route will soon offer lift- equippad buses to meet the needs of this special population. The contract between the City and Omnitrans is without mention of responsibility for the upkeep and improvements of bus stops. These are qtr.. 4 *TPPta and medians or parkways. A suggestion 2 i at this point would be the improvement of stops so that they would provide access to the specially equipped buses. A second suggestion for your consideration would be to implea@ita a senior discount on water bills collected within the city. General Revenue Sharing Funds could be used to augment this sort of program therefore aiding seniors on fixed incomes while not losing the income to the agency. The amount of the discount could be discussed by the council, a suggested amount is 100'. The idea of water bill discounts to not new in the West End and should be considered by the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga. The preceding suggestions received the approval of the nest Valley Regional Council on Aging. Representatives of Senior Citizens clubs in Rancho Cucamon3a sit or, this board. Cecilia b:artinez and Kathi Guayante are those representattres. Additional membership includes boar"_ members of the American Association of Retired Persons' local chapter. It is hoped that those suggestions will be given serious consideration. Too often, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is claimed to be a "young city" because of its recent incorporation and popula- tion exoloaion. Take this opportunity to rocognize the needn of the older .citizens of thin area and to show appreciation for their early accomplishments which benefittod this area. If you would like help or additional information, pleasa feel free to contact me. Renew Lovato Area Coordinator Office on A >ing Son'oi Information and Referral 316 w "8" mtailo. ra. 91762 988 -9611 M E M 0 R A N 0 U M DATE: July S. 1979 70. City Manager and City Cou.w:il FC011.• Bill Holley, Director Community Services SUBJECT Attached Ikswrandum by Office on Aging Regarding Revenue Sharing The city of Rancho Cucamonga has been, and continues to be, aware of its senior citizen population To this point we have or supported since last September programs aimed at addressing the needs of this special population group Specifically The V I P Vub (see attached) Dial -a -ride Social Recreation (monthly dances, classes, pot tucks, etc) Senior Nutrition Visiting Health Care Information and deferral Services Since the Neighborhood Facility has opened, it has primarily been used for Senior programs Many new senior activities will be implemented at the Lions Park Community Center upon its completion While we can always improve any program, and we will of course continue efforts to improve our Senior programing, I an very pleased with the progress to date. With specific attention to the memorandum of Ms. Lavato regard'ng Revenue Sharing, .find the following: 1. The improvement of bus stops, while needed in many instances, is not high in the list of priorities for the limited resources at our disposal 2 The issue of discount water rates are not with- in the perview of the city and should be directed toward the attention of the Cucamonga County Mater District. may be of further assistance on this matter, let me know. a a t +• ,._ .��,_zr,r RANrCfiO CUCAHONCA COMMUNITY SERVICES RECREATION DEPARTMENT ' VIP Club c$EN10RUVZ- Senior Citizen Program Recreation Supervisor: 9791 Arrow Highway Karon tiatchnm Rancho Cucamonga Phone 989 -1851 ex 52 June 1979 Dear V I P Members: Thanks to a great job done by Mary Kincaid :veryone had a most enjoyable trip to Las Vegas We have high hopes that we may be able to plan another trip soon to some other new place We are gaining new members at quite a steady rate, but some of us have not made enough effort to ask our friends and neighbors to join Please work at this a little harder as the more members,the the more fun we can have On June 14, the Social Security Administration will show a movie on Supplemental Social Security Hr Mario Villa from the Pomona office will speak on Social Security and Medicare with a short question and answer period. Now that we have moved into our new building, it is time that we get started electing committees for various activities In that way, we can become more active in various endeavors If you would be willing to serve on some committees, please give your name to Charles Hager, our Vice President We wish to thank Natascha Patz of the Ontario Travel Bureau for giving us information on trips available to us along with pricing information Tell your friends, neighbors and fellow members that all the meetings of this club are now nt 9791 Arrow Highway _ The V I P Officers Howard L McMahon, President Program Schedule for June 6/7/79 10:00 - 10 45 a m Announcements - Introduction of guests and new members, information of future programs 10 45am -12:30 p m Group Activities - Bingo, cards 12:30 - 1:00 p m Lunch - bring sack lunch 1:00 - 1:45 p m Free Time - Exercise, games White Elephant sale 1:45 - 1:00 p.m. Clean Up 6/14/79 10:00 - 11 00 a m Bingo Time - Indoor and outdoor games or cards 11:00 - 12 00 noon Movie - Supplemental Social Security and speaker from S S office 12:00 - 12:30 Announcements 12 30 - 1:00 Lunch - Bring sack lunch 1:00 - 1 30 Clean Up �.. 6/21/79 10:00 a.m. - 10:45 a.m 10:45 a.m - 11:15 a m 11:15 a m - 12:15 p m 12:15 pm - 100 pm 1:00 p m - 1:45 p m 1:45 p m - 2:00 p m 6/28/79 10:00 a m - 10:45 a m 10:45 a m - 12:00 noon Noon - 1:00 p m 1:00 p m. - 1:45 p.m. 1:45 p m. - 2:00 p m. When: Time: Place: For: Cost: !uric By Sponsored By: N3tes Announcements - Activity upd7 introduce new members, etc. Lxarcise Health Screening Lunch and Birthday Cake - you bring the lunch and we'll furnish the cake Horseshoes and Shuffleboard Clean Up Announcements Bingo and Cards Pot Luck Dinner Exorcise and Outdoor Activity Clean Up ATTENTION III June Dance Sunday, June 24 2 p m until 5pm 9791 Arrow Highway Senior Citizens, 50 years and older $1 00 Tickets to be sold in advance at weekly meetings Abby Calls Combo The City of Rancho Cucamonga Senior Citizen V I P Club Bowling Day - Every Tuesday at 1:00 p m at Thunderbird Lanes, 1555 Mountain Ava Ontario City discount - 45c per game and 40c for shoes Officers will meet the 2nd and 4th Thursdays before the regular meeting (at 9:30 a m ) Please bring friends and prospective new members to any meeting We would like to introduce them and make them feel welcome HELP our members'iip grow Birthday cake donor_„ by Councilman Palombo, owner of "The Bakery" in Rancho Cucamonga I` i . J M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 5, 1979 TO City Council FROM' Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Citizen Petition for Paramedics The city has received a petition with 59 names requesting the city council to provide revenue sharing funds to assist the Foothill Fire District in esta- blishing a free paramedic service similar to that provided by Los Angeles County We have a nieber of proJlems with the request First of a't, it is questionable whether the city should be involved in the affairs which are appropriately handled by the Foothill Fire District Secondly, there are some serious problems with paramedic services They are expensive snd they also generate substantial labor relations problems for fire departments which are involved to the prograe. Another serious problem is that in our budget discussions previously we have in effect committed our revenue sharing funds to help offset the costs for providing general law enforcement services within the community Therefore, any changes in the allocation of funds would result in some changes in our city budget The petition has bee. culated primarily by the Senior Citizens within the cocmuni cy It would i that two courses are appropriate if the citizens of gancho Cu,amnga are seriously interested in paramedic services The first alternative would be to place the measure on the Foothill Fire District ballot as a tax override measure which would mean that voter approval would be required +s set forth in the State constitution A second alternative would be to refer the problem to the Foothill Fire District Board sirce the city 1s not at this time in the fire department business RECOMMFIIDATIO'1 It is recommended that the city council refer this petition to the Foothill Fire District for possible placement as a ballot issue for a tax override to support the program. In the post Proposition 13 era, programs which incur significant expenses should be subjected to voter approval before implementation LMW be M3 WE, the undersigned residents of the uITY OF RkNCEO CUCAMONGA, hereby petition the a,yor and City Council to provide money from the @avenue t r . f, 5u Sharing Funds to assist the Foothill lire District in eateb;fshing a •_.• free raramedle Service to service the area that In so trained to v J r„ administer drugs and works in conjunction with a hospital in the Service to be similar to that in the Los Angeles area. The OIt7 to work for funding of this project also from San Bernardino County 44 and Foothill tire District. hP,-'; 7A 4 r 8',30 ;a J. ttG�9a�i *• „ Q L i+4 ♦t 1 a: .,ems..... ,p . �U 7-Ai G�'..id , u 79 A 0 Jr,`r %4r. r . I'_i 1 k.. •* Y`b�.aS! Ilit, the undersigned residents of the uliy of WCBO nUCAMDNOA, herebyN..'47hW petition the mayor and Uity Council to provide money from the ➢evssue 4 Sharing Funds to assist the Yoothill ilfe District In ee Wbli ehing 414 1 free raramedic Service to Service the area that is ao trained to b administer drugs and works Sr. conjunction with a hospital In the erea;! "t Service to be similar to that in the Los Angeles area. The City to i 'cork for funding of this project also from San Bernardino Uouaty *� and Foothill rare District. Y CeW -i 4•te t / , t p V�eOi.ew..... 044l4. 7/PS a i ` 9�'�oeti a •.' z 2�u v L A4� J ; Fill P< (�s�„�, sG,z ,ate . )7L..Yta-. /n 59✓ u/,E` /ee-m lf 7F.Z a rr WE, the undersigned residents of the CI77 OF FAN= CUGALANCA, hereL/ " i petition the mayor end uity Council to pro vide money from the ltavenua Sharing Funds to assist the FontL111 sire District Is estab�iahlag a •`C ` free reramedic Service to service the area that is so trained to , administer drugs and works in conjunction with a hospital is the ars[: Service to be similar to that in the Lee Angeles area. ''he City o n.. work for funding of this project also from San Bernardino County :•Y� and nFoothill fire District. CP Till- 73 �f�l C 'e 41/3 Kt" �I• "` L7 f 4yc fit» ti (.ttl, /- �•,•f"" "_ y. C(ICO� G v irk �e� N.��' -� °" 7o-3,r 1 ^�u P 737 s-• Tr �F�Lw Zyi C'- eAp"Ck�-- 7 �i WS, the underaimed residents of the uIff OF BA.`7CBO CCCAYDYCA, hereby petition the mayor and City Council to provide money from tha !?avenue Sharing Funds to assist the foothill Are District in eatabti7 ahSng s � �•' free reramedic Service to service the arse that to so trained to administer drugs and works In conjunction with a hospital in the area. , *,{ RR' Ser:lce to be similar to that in the us Angeles area. The City to j3{ r work for funding of this project aieo from San Bernardino County k it and Foothill the --District. % � LL2l LQ-s•� �$1rl %0 M �F} ✓. Q,�i<< �Yn ll. . i C f 7T a / �• 'r4 ` Aveh t irk /� % _ -L. M E M O R A N D U M DATE July 5, 1979 TO City .ouncil FROM Lauren M Wasserman City Manager SUBmECT Reienue Sharing Request At this evening's meeting, cc Armando Navarro will be making a request to the city council for appropriation of revenue sharing funds to finance project HOY As council is aware, we have had some problems with this Organization in the past With,n the last year there have been five directors of the organization and numerous sdministrative p,obiems with which Bill Holley has been involved We do no. feel that revenue sharing is a,, appropriate source of funding for the group We have indicated that to Or Navarro However, he has stated that he must "for the record" make a request to the pity council RECOXIMATION It ,s recomended that the city reaffirm its previous position of encouraging project HOY to be sponsored by the West End communities rather than any particular city In addition, it is suggested that other sources of funding may be more appropriate for this type of purpose Again, please remember that revenue sharing funds are not actually waiting o be spent They have been tentatively committed throughout our budget process to offset a portion of the city's costs for law enforcement services Any appropriation of revenue sharing funds other than for law enforcement purposes •ould require some other budgetary adjustments In summary, the record with project HOY has not been particularly good We have encountered a number of serious problems over the past year and half and we do not feel that the project is worthy of support at least through the appropriation of revenue sharing funds In addition, it should be noted that we have not neglected our minority community Over the next three years we will be spending ma -e than 3560,000 for street improvements, sidewalks, and park acquisition in the minority neighborhoods These funds will be coming from Housing and Community Development Block Grant funds to which the city is entitled It is recommended that the city council urge project HOY to seek other funding methods and to organize on d multi -city basis in order to improve the possibility of receivinq Irani funds The problems in our minority community are not limited CO am One city It would be best if they were handled on a regional Or at least multi -city basis rather than individually as suggested by Or Navarro — EAW:baa / ,x RESOLUTION NO. 79-56 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAtICHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY NOISING AUTHORITY WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16 (7) (b) of the Act, as amended, is necessary that the local governing body enter into a Cooperation Agreement with the Local Authority providing for local cooperation in connection with such low-re-it housing project; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 34515 of the Health and Safety Code express authority is given for local governing bodies to enter in agreements with housing authorities providing for local cooperation with respect to low -rent housing projects; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in compliance with the provisions of Section 34519 of the California Health and Safety Code, this governing body did on March 7, 1979, adopt a Resolution authorizing the publication in a newspaper of general circulation on lurch 13, and March 21, 1979, before this governing body for the purpose of giving all Interested persons an opportunity to be heard as to whether suLh Cooperation Agreement should be entered into; and there has been made available one copy of the proposed Cooperation Agreement for inspection by interested persons prior to the mentioned public hearing; and WHEREAS, the notices for a public hearing have been published as above provided, and this governing body has held a public hearing starting at the hour of 7 p.m. on the 21th day of March, giving proposed Cooperation Agreement in the form hereinafter set forth should be entered Into, which said hearing has been concluded with all matters in connection therewith having been fully Lonsiderea by this body; NW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESO,VEO by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows: 1 There exists in this locality a neea for such low -rent housing at rents within the means of low- income families or persons 2 The application of the Local Authority to HUD for a Preliminary Loan in an amount not to exceed (t of units x $500 for surveys and planning connection with low -rent hour ng pro outs o not to exceed _ dwelling units is hereby approved 3. The Ranchi Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the develtpnent, const, uetion and ownership by the Local Authority of the Project as defined In Paragraph 1 (a) of the Cooperation Agreement set forth in Paragraph 4 hereof 4 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council, after having held a public hearing and giving all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, hereby determines, pursuant to the provisions of the California Hgusing ' Resolution No. 79 -56 -2- Cooperation Law (berg Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code), to enter into a Cooperation Agreement in substantially the form hereinafter set forth with the Local Authority. The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino is hereby authorized anJ directed to execute such Cooperation Agreement in the name and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to affix or impress the official seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga thereon and to attest to same Such Cooperation Agreement shall be in substantially the form of the agreement attached hereto ATTEST; PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT V ty e1 -11-1r — yor MEMORANDUM TO: Lauren Wasserman FROM: Harry Empey SUBJECT: Budget Attachcd is a summary of the budget as presented to Council during their workshop sessions. Some figures have changed but is due only to salary adjustments and budget changes as directed by Council. HJE:cak r <iti a gal WNW K� �P F•M1 O� 6 W OOWbPM1 NI.I NI P1Pd d M1�OWOOPNNO 4100 d 10 W 1'1 A OPJIIOI bPPPYf 1010 M1 b (7POOWW 1.1 N1010 •��•"O N Q u ��yy f•1 N10vNM1Yf 10NPN (Od�1pNO�QbNNM1 d GO 1pN f'f r.101(�1'IM1p O 01 f �� �M1 N10 YfPQ WNQPWf•1W OQC r �NNNNM1N� �NNdf•11'1�� N � QO Y C ^y d d M1 WOO N O P W Y d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11D 10 .00SNOC 1 v 1 O ^ Q > p` 0000000000010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1^ N 1fp�I IJ Nuf 10000 pO Ih � WNVP WIO O ONNdNN N 1� P lql N N r� 1Od 1I`1ppWO10d1 pufbO�OCO.�vl PlnO W N 1111111P'111 0000000000 � O 1('OI INbl�l�^ ^�1 W 1111111 11 Q ) Yp ^ b N Nb N� OO11110NM1QPM1f.f tf� W 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W V� Ovl•Ib M1bWdM1M1 1 NNn•{10pvN O1�10�P0 v b �O 0000 000 O O > 1 bN10WPM1N�� f") 1 1 1 1 1 1 � W L'i ^M1 ^1`10 N d OOP WbbY1O d 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1p 1 � 10 � v L O O P 1 1 I N ����((.yy.yy11 lO W wl 1 OP1. OOONlD 1710M10 17 � 000000000 1 1 1 1 1 d q �qf� 1 1 1 6J Ip 1 1 1 1 P N ^6mIN�O NON H N N f•1 b 1.1 N N�N� 1.4 1 1/111111 1 00 104101 1 �WO�PdI P 1 11 1111 IPI 1 P W 2^ 0 1 1 1 d e l O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Y l d u N C b W LI-•W lLL F > d •• .O v 41 6 C V L p1 g 974! y 4 A ^NMV Y NP NT V' C N YOCOgM N u JC�M WC Y O C Cam+• >Cq � b V O I� V C U T C � LL q g q Y N \Qd@� 010E Yd � � O8O dl�dq Y ~ p eppuY YNd�ob•T ~ O of TTq�•TUC���pu YuCUyM Cyg101O6Rp p J6�gM i.YO qCqM 011. VULLOCU q6W 6 1J N J4W0•NIN6'W SOU r REVENUE ,' .� SUIIMARY 1979 -80 1978 -79 1978 -79 ESTI14ATED CATEGORY BUDGET REVISED 1979 -80 Taxes: Proparty Tax 302564 235051 239752 Sales b Use Tax 256000 795000 903041 Cigarette Tax 95000 105000 106830 Property Transfer Tax 75000 90000 70000 Franchises 235000 273443 280000 Sub -total 957564 1498494 1615623 1 Licenses d Permits: Business Licenses 1OS000 170000 150000 Dog Licenses 1000 750 10000 Building Percifts 320007 248989 39700) Other Licenses 8 Permits 250 1401 - 1000 'C Sub -total 426250 422140 549000 Fines. Forfeitures, b Penalties: Court Fines 2500 1100 1000 ;h Revenue from Other Agencies: 46067 -0- -G- i Alcoholic Beverage -0- 17012 18240 Mctor Vehicle in Lieu 535761 53SU33 765409 v Off - Highway License Fees -0- 649 693 Highway Carriers Business -0- 3878 6684 4 License Tax Sub -total $84328 559472 792026 Charges for Services ii Engineering Feet 40000 16217 100000 Planning Fees 61000 61000 75000 Sub -total 101000 77217 175000 S • NtVENUE SUMMARY 1979 -80 CATEGORY Miscellaneous: 55000 80000 50000 interest Earnings Sale of Printed Material 100 400 5155 400 -0- Other Revenues 11300 65400 85555 50400 Sub -total 2135542 2642878 3186049 TOTALS Special Revenue - Transfers In: 0_ _0_ 185189 Revenue Sharing gi6E0 26000 30000 Traffic Safety Fund 6000 6000 6000 Gas Tax 2101.5 0_ 18000 150000 S 8 154 Distribution 97680 50000 371189 Sub -total TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2233222 2778433 3557238 598982 657663 656936 Prior Year Carryover Total Operating Revenue 2740524 3410096 4214174 Special Funds Revenue 99300 493298 Park Development 99300 817306 817306 1086367 Local Transportation S Gas Tax 122135 102000 47165 CETA -0 _ _0_ -0- FAU "0- _0_ 222000 Block Grant -0' _0_ 240000 Systems Development -0- -0 336600 Beautification 0_ -0- -0_ 103145 Storm Drains 0- 1851S9 Revenue Sharing 1038741 1013606 3076616 Total Special Fund; TOTAL ESTITIATED REVENUE 3179265 4428702 j11S,43Z L J i H E M 0 R A N D U H Date: July 3, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Added Agenda Item, July S, 1979 - Lions Park Deed Transfer The County of San Bernardino and the Cucamonga District Lions Club have agreed to transfer ownership of Lions Park and it's facilities to the City of Rancho Cucamonga This transfer has Seen in the works for well over a year This protraction of a relatively simple operation is due to two factors; the pace of the County and the reluctance of the Lions Club to authorize the property transfer to the City without insuring protection of the original intent of the donation That original intent was that the property excluding the library portion, be used for "park - purposes only" You may recall at the time of incorporation, the Lion e Club was very concerned that the City offices would be located in the facility to the exclusion of recreational and community uses We have assured the Lions Club that the City will honor the deed restrictions and the intent of the donation in seeing that the park and it's facilities are used for "community purposes" Find attached the AApreeement Deed, stating that the City will use the property for "Park one Recreation purposes ", and the Grant Deed on Lions Park from County to the City Recommended Action Accept the transfer of the Lions Park property from the County to the City and accept the conditions of the Agreement Deed between the City and the Cucamonga District Lions Club. -out or z n3�c Mayor to sign the latter Those documents will be forwarded to County for Board action on the Grant Deed Attachments BH /art+ AND WHEN RE00RDED UAIL TO AGREEMENT DEED I A.P. No. 208 - 011 -57 1 CUCAMONGA DISTRICT LIONS CLUB, a California Corporation and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Incorporated under the laws of the State of California by mutual agreement between said parties, l do hereby agree that that certain restriction as recited in that certain deed from Cucamonga District Lions Club, a California Corporation to the County of a San Bernardino, a body corporate and politic, recorded September 7 1973, In Book 8263, page 83. Official Records of said County, which roads as follows: This conveyance is made and accepted upon the express restriction that the 6 land being conveyed shall be used for County building and park purposes only and that the portion of said land not occupied by the library building shall be 7 known as "Lion's Park ", provided, that a breach of the foregoing shall cause sold premises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who e shall have the right to enforce immediate re -entry 4pon said premises in the event of any such breach, is hereby modified to read as follows: 9 This conveyance Is made and accepted upon the express restriction that the ID land being conveyed shall be used solely for Park and Pesreation purposes and that portion of said land not occupied by the Library building shall be known II as "Lions Park ", provided that a breach of the foregoing shall cause said prem- ises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who shall. 12 have the right to enforce Immediate re - entry upon said premises in the event of any such reach 1] 14, DATE: CUCAMON/IAC�R T S ,CUB, a Cali ti K�� By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: James L Frost, Mayor By: Lauren Wasserman, City Car -I- (See Page 2 for Acknowledgment) 17 Is DATE: 19 21 Pw A Rv s 22 .be Na 5 14; 2] rpntf ar i N1 wwm e/ zn J 2] tM�t eta, zr K�� By: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: James L Frost, Mayor By: Lauren Wasserman, City Car -I- (See Page 2 for Acknowledgment) TC *%"_. SCi RANCC,7 y.al sre a .NAME PROJECT NO PARCEL HO'.'0P011 -57 THIS is TO CURYy THAT THE INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY CONVEYED BY THE WTNIN INSTRttYENT BUNG A- uItD FROM THE COUNTY OF SW BERNARDINO TO the City of Rancho CuCamonga IS HEREBY ACCEPTED BY OROCR OF City Council AND THE GRANTEE CONSENTS TO THE AECQtUAT10N THEREOF BY ITS QTLY AUTHORIZED OFFICER DATED By GRANT DEED NO TAX DUE THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a 'ndy corporate and politic, for a valuable consideration, receipt of which Is hereby acknowledged, hereby GRANTS to THE CITY OF RANC10 CUCAMONGA. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California, the following described real property In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Barnard no, State of California; That po,tion of the North 528 00 feet of Lot 11. Map of Subdivision "C ", Cucamonga Vineyard Tract as per Pomp recorded In Book 21 of Maps, Page 67, In the office of the Recorder If sa'd County, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lu• 11; Thence South 00' II' 30" West along the East line of said Lot 11, a distance of 20 00 feet to a point of Intersection with a line tl.st is parallel with and 20 00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot 11; TF =e West along said parallel Linn, a distance of 250 00 feet to an inter - s,ztion with a line that is parallel with and 250 00 feet Westerly of the East line of said Lot 11, being the True Point of Beginning. Thence South 00' 11' 30" West along said parallel line, a distance of 335 00 feet to an Intersection with a line that is parallel with and 355.00 feet South- erly of the North line of said Lot 11; Thence East along said parallel line, a distance of 250.00 feet to an inter- section with the East line of said Lot 11; Thence South 00' 11' 30" West along the East line of said Lot Ill a distance of 173.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 10, Tract No. 3573, as per Map recorded In Book 50 of Maps, Pages 102 and 103, In the office of the Recorder of sold County; Thence West along the North line of said Lot 10, a distance of 382.58 feet to an Intersection with the East line of that parcel of land described in Dead recorded May 11, 1964, In Book 6146, Page 423. Official Records; Thenc.T North 00' 11' 30" East along said East line, a distance of 488 07 feet to thz beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Southeast and having a radius of 20 00 feet; ., ! Thence Northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 89' 48' 30" IPrrra of a distance of 31 35 feet to a point of tangency Mlth a line that is parall.' with y 4 1 and 20 00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot 11; Thence East along said parallel line, a distance of 112.65 feet to the True Point of Beginning Subject to the recital in the deed from Cucamonga District Lions' Club, a California Corporation, to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate and I BPOlitic, recorded September 7, 1977 In Book 8263, Pago 83 of Official Records, as follows: This conveyance Is made and accepted upon the expross restriction that the t land being conveved shall be used for County building and park purposes only and that the port lon of said land not occupied by the Ilbrary but lding shall be 1 knwn as "Llm's Park ", provided, that a breach of the foregoing shall cause said premises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who shall have the right to enforce Immediate ra -entry upon said premises in the event of any such breach. r, Witness the hand of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and the seal of the County of San Bernardino, of the State of California this x day of 19 D COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO to BY II ATTEST: Chairman, Board o upery sors ANDREE DISHAROON, Clerk of the I "- Board of Supervisors of 0 San Bernardino County 1 by 11 Deputy If STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss 10 COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO ) IT On , 19_ before me, the undersigned, a Notary PUblil In ano for said County and tote, personally appeared Ix known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of said County and AUDREE DISNAROON By: , known to me to be the Deputy Clerl 19 of the Board of Supervisors that executed the within Instrument, and known to 40 me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the body Politic and corporate therein named, and acknowledged to rs that suet body SI politic and corporate executed the within instr4;ment pursuant to Its by -laws or a resolution of Its Board of Supervisors. WITNESS my hand and official seat, _ ^3 Notary Public In aid or said County and State. .'s ^P _'7 2 ^D 111 TI :L1 1. tr Pok'riov Or• cosh, eucA,seoveA !� /NC•Y /rR0 rRncr, i�9. ��r /cr IN M.4 C. rY OF .P,4 VCS "O COCAG•f"0-4 BASC LIM-- XPeNU! .� t/L tv' lf000' IL •S[]1' !i • n E; f 6 v. u � �, revue• b 0 w •. JJ' J nag a JOB L00 N06 COUNTY Or P�I,PAI SO�a raa[cl no. 5AN f3C.PNAR/J /NO COUNTY A100OZ76 WORKS AGENCY PARCEL NO. Y 'S FFICE OAT-ie.» .,....... .............................. Juno 14. 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOYCA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Special Meeting The adjourned meeting or the City Council convened in an executive sesslc, at St10 p.m. In the city offices at 9120 -C Baseline by Mayor Frost A11 =abets of the council were present along with City Manager, Laurel, Wasserman Following the executive session to discuss personnel matters, the Mayor declared a recess at approximately 6:45 p e. The meeting was reconvened At the Library, 9191 Baseline, at 7:08 p M. with all mem.,ers of the council present City Attorney, Sam Crowe, was alai present at this session. 1. Status Report and Analvsfs of Con[!n¢encv Fund. Mr Wassersan eummrized the statue of the contingency fund for the city council. presencco cne recommendation or the Community Advisory Committees that law enfor,e- nent services be Increased in two Specific areas ws follows: Burglary prevention c Traffic Following a discussion, it was mved by Councilman Mlkels to add the position of crime prevention officer to the proposed contract as outlined in t - mmorandum sub- mitted by staff The motion di-d for lack of second Motion: It was proved by Councilmen Bridge, seconded by Palomoo that the pre�,ozed levels of service an outlined it the Program of Sar-Ice not be changed At title Lime. Councilman Bridge noted that rho city council my at som point during the year, if the need arises, amend the contract to provide for additional law enforcement - personnel Motion carried 4 -1 (NOES: Mikels) Councilman Mlkels stated he felt the city council should make a decision regarding additional personnel new rather than at a later date. 1. Disc•,ssion of city hall space needs. Following a discussion of the need for additional space for city offices, the council arrived at s consensus thatthe staff should include funds for additional space in the 1979 -80 budget. 4. Ravi, of Community Sarvlces Department proposed Program of Service. Review of eoamual ;y services department proposed Program of Serylca. Po13ow1og a brief aummry of the budget, the city council indicated that it was satisfied with the proposed levels of service. S. Recosacndarfon ra¢ard inR Planning Technician nos It ions Sn _Community Davolopmant Department. Hr Wasserman nobd that the position of Planning Tochnleian owns previously filled by a CETA employee. However, the position is new vacant It was recomended by the staff that the position of Planning Technician be Included as a budget Item and that the position of Planning Intern be deleted from the Community L Development Departraent Planning Dlvlsisn budgat It was the consensus of the city council that the staff be directed to mile the necrssary changes Including the changes Ii salary and fringe benefits June 14, 1979 Minutes Page 2 6. Rvuommended PollcvregardinR Reimbursement for Use of Private Vehicles. Mr. Wasserman presented a recommendation that employees who use their automobiles for Ott, husinean be reimburaed at the rate of 22 cents per mile beginning July 1 In addition M.r Wasserman proposed, and the council arcepted, the following ad- Justments Jn monthly mileage for department heads: Director of Community Services $125 uo. Director of Community Development $'25 mo. City Engineer $125 mo Director of Finance $ 75 W. Asst City Manager $ 75 mo Building Official $ 75 mo The staff was Instructed to make the necessary adjustments throughout thr budget to reflect the changes approved by council. 7. Recommended Approval of Proposed Job Reclassiticatlone. Hr Wasserman presented a recommendatico for four position reclassiflcntions to reflect more accurately the nature of the duties being perform d. The positions are as follows: =1 Clerk Typist 9uilding Tech II Parks - Recreation Supv. Asst to City Mgr. i� Sr. Clk Typist Plan Checker Recreation Supv. Asst City Manager DEPARTHM: Engineering Building Division Comunity Services Administration Motior: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo and passed unanimously that the recommendations be approved as proposed. B. Review of Proposed Street Maintenance and Capital Improvement Program. (The capital Improvement program had been reviewed by the tommunity Advisory Coaitteas T City Engineer Hubbs presented a summary of the street maintenance program and ci,pital improvement p•ogra^ for the coming fiscal year Following discussion, the c.ty council reached the concenaus that the program as recommended was satisfactory and should be included in the final budget. i:. Ordinance No. 81 An ordinance establishing the multi- purpose room at Carnelian School as meeting place for regular meetings of the city council while the Community Services Building is under construction To be adopted as an urgency measure. Motioni Moved by Schlosser, seconded by MSkels to approve Ordinance No. 81 and waive enti-e reading. Motion unrnlmausly carried 1-0. Wasserman read title and number ORDINANCE NO. 81 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE LOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOR- NIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4 AND PROVIDING FOR ITS ADOPTION Ac AN URGENCY ORDINANCE. 10. Request for Continuation of Crossing Guard at Central School. Me Wasserman indicared that the crossing guard stationed at Archibald Avenue and Church Street for Cucamongn Jr High School will be needed again during a portion of next fiscal year since the raffle signal at that location will not be Installed for some tiros. City C^ .,cll agreed that the staff should place the appropriate funds In the . safety budget for crossing guard at this location. Funding is to be shared equally by the Central School District and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. L June 14, 1979 Minutes Page 7 11. Request (or Addl[lonnl Fund ¢ for &>mb Squad. the council 9ugges:nd that this item be do forrcd [or further slntudy si,co the sheriff's department Is also providing bomb squad services to the city. 12. Condemnation - Southwest Corner of Basclino and Ilellman. Mr. Wasserman noted that an appraisal had been prepared by the County Public Works Agency for the property which is a small parcel located on the southwest corner of Baseline and Hcllman. The updated appraisal Is $20,700 The present owner, John F. Field, has indicated a willingness to sell the property to the city for $20,500 with all costs for escrow being paid for by the city It was recommended by Hr Wasserman that the city accept the offer and execute all documents to begin the opening of escrow at Bank of American Cucamonga branch Notion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to accept the offer to buy the property at $20,500 and to execute all documents to begin escrow. Motion unanimously carried. ll. ADJOURNMENT. The meeting adjuurned at 9:22 p m. Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager /City Clerk r June 20, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Mecting 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular mating of the City Council was held in the Multi- ptrpose Room at Carnelian Elementary School, 7501 Carnelian Street, Rancho Cucanongo, an Wednes- day. June 20, 1979. The meeting was ct.iled to order at 7:10 pat. by Mayor James C. Frost who led in the pledge to the flog Present: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, and Mayor Frost. Also present were: City Manager. Lauren Wasserman; Interim Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Marager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs. Approval of Minutes: May 99 1979 and June 6, 1979 Moved by Hikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the minutes. Mot!on carried 5-0. 2. A;NOUNCEHiNTS. a Ion Mikels had been selected by SCAG to serve on the Comm:nity and Economic Development Coeittee. b. AB -227, the bail -out bill, had passed [`trough the Senate ind was confirmed by the Assembly and was sitting on the Covernor's desk for signature c. Because of the resignation of Aruthur Btidge on the Historical Commission, there was a vacancy. Council directed staff to start accepting applications for the vacant position. d. Request item 4b be dtieted from the Consent Calendar, Resolutions No 19 -51 and 52, for abandoment of a portion of Hellman Avenue dedication duo to the realignment and additional dedications on the west aide and right-cf -way quit- claimed on gasoline for the orderly development of the southeast corner. e Mikels asked that 4h be removed from the Consent Calendar for further dis- cussion; Authorise execution of the Comunity Development Block Grant between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of ban Bernardino. 1. COMITTEE REPORTS. a Advisory Ccvmittee - none b Historical Commission - none. i 6. CONSE17 CALENDAR. a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $279.099.87; register no. 79 -6 -21. Lb. Resolutions for street alignments - deleted from the Consent Calendar c. Road Maintenance Management Services. Recotmmnd R.1 A. Maintenance Contractors to develop a detailed maintenance proposal for city review. City Council Minutes June 70. 1979 Page ' d Parcel Hap 3976 The parcel map consists of 4 parcels located north of Hidden Farm Road between Moonstone and Sunstone Developer - Dan August RESOLUTION NO. 50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 3976 (TENTATIVE PARCEL 1UJ' NO. 77 -410). c Tract 9223: Accept roads and release bond to Cameo Land Co.. Inc. Performance bond (road) $118,000 I 7tact 9382: Accept roads and release bond to Lesny /Wilshire Properties, Inc Performance bond (road) $158,000 g. Tract 94'3: Accept roads and release bond to Chevron COnsttUCLian. Performance bond (road) $ 84,000 h. Community Development Block Grant - removed for discussion. 1 Authorization to seek bids and purchase vehicles Included in 1978 -79 budgetary appropriations Authorization is requested for staff to seek bids and purchase the following vehicle•: 3 sednna for vehicle pool, 1 sedan for building Inspector, 1 stake bed truck. Although the appropriations for these vehicles were approved as emarr rents to 1978 -79 budget, the vehicles will not be available until after Jaly 1 Motion: Moved by Palombe, .ccnnd,d by Mikels to approve the Consent Calendar Motion crrricd 5 0. 4h Item removed from Consent Calendar for discussion. Authorize execution of the Community Uevelupment Block Grant between the City of Rancho Cuca- monga and the County of San Bernardino council approved the egrecmant lost Fall Mikels stated the agreement should be one that could be renewed on a yearly basis and felt the agreement should be clarified to reflect this The City Attorney also recommended this be changed The city attorney drafted a change to replace and supercede paragraph 2 of item 2 (lines 29 through 38 inclusive) of page three as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement. CITY may terminate thin .greement for Program years 1980 -81 and /or 1981 -82 by giving COUNTY written notice of CITY'S election to so terminate not later than March 1, 1980 if CITY elects to terminate with respect to both Program years, or not later than March 1, 1981 if the CITY elects to terminate with re a pact to Program year 1981 -82 only In the event CITY eICCLS to terminate as herein provided, all provisions of this agreement providing for or re- ferring to a longer term shall be deemed amended to reflect the shortened tem." Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve the change in the agreement. Motion carried 5 -0. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve the agreement as amended Motion carried 5-0. l L City Council Minutes June 20, 1979 Page I S. PU13LIC H&UtIRGS. 5. \y Revonim bharing Funds. Report by 1_iuren Na+sernin Staff recommended that ill revenue sharing funds be rased to olfvot a portion of the rity'n total post for providing law enforcement services. 4.:ettng opened for public Input There being nune, the public hearing was closed C ?lotion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to continue to July 5 for the second public hearing Motion ...cried 5 -0 6. CITY HA4ACER'S STAFF REPORTS. 6A. Janitorial Services. As instructed by the City Council, the staff asked bidders for the city hall maintenance services to re- submit their quotes in order to include the coats for providing all equiptrant and cleaning materials Three bids were received All three companies have the required liability insurance and will guarantee the rate quoted for a one -year p_rfod. Harry Empey, Director of Finance, presented the report The three companies were: Freddie Miles Maintenance - Claremnt $415 00 per month Garcia Janitor Service - Ontario $415 00 per month Sterling Maintenance Service - China $450.07 per month fir Enpev stated that Garcia Janitor Service was unable to provide references as to their ability; therefore, he recommended awarding the contract to Freddlc 81 vs Maintenance, the low b cider Council questioned if Sterling Maintenance inuld give better service Mr Empey stated, in his opinion, Freddie tiles Maintenance had excellent references and could provide as good a service Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to award the janitorial services for city hall to Freddie Miles Maintenance for a one -year period at the rote of $415 per month to include all equipment and supplies Motion carried 5 -0 rian stlu askea the City council to adopt a resolution (Rasolution No 79 -2 stating the city's Intent to carry out specific actions recommended by the Draft 208 Plan for Rancho Cucamonga. Those actions were: a Mairtain existing street sweeping programs (prior to Proposition 11) with consideration given to Increasing chair effectiveness in C reducing wastaluads to receiving waters, to the extent financially feaslbls b Maintain current litter control programs, to the extent financially feasible. c Maintain current catch basin and storm drain cleaning programs L with consideration given to increasing program effectiveness, to the extent financially feasible d Emphasize reduction of runoff volume and peak flow rates as mitigation measures in environmental impact reports (£IRs) and In coudLtions for approval for new developments City Council Minutes June 20, 1979 Page 1. it t report was presented by Party Hogan, Senior Planner lie stated this wo..W n,,t ln,renso the financial Ilahlllty of the city in any way Not loo: `loved by :Ilkels to appru•s Resolution No. 79 -25 and waive entire reading The motto„ was seconded by 2•idge in order to put the Item on the tluur I..r Iidr"sslon Discussion followed by the Council Motion fat cd by the tollowin; vote: AYES: Mikels 'IDES: Su }tosser, Palocbo, Bridgn, Front 6C Arti -le 8 /Transportation Development Act Claim. Report by Jim Robinson Each year the City Council must authorize rho city manager to sign the Article 8 Claim with SCAC in order to receive TOA (street and road) monies T esefunds era generated from 1/4 of one percent of the sales tax on gasoline Funds may be used for street and road purposes once transit needs of the community are reasonable met The Council must do the following: I Authorise t *v city manager to sign the Article 8 Claim. 2 Authorize the following distribution of TDA fonds for fiscal year 1979 -80: a. Omnitrans- Capital (purchase of buses, sedans ) $ 35,724 00 Fixed route (operating) 101,911 00 Dial -a- ride /Dial -a -lift 39.512.00 $177,147 GO Lees credit for carry-over _ (delay In Dial -a -ride) - 26,677.OU $150,47( 00 b City of Rancho Cucamonga— Streets and roads $513,891.00 GRAND TOTAL $664,3t4 00 :lotion: Movea by Bridge, seconded by Palocbo to authorize the city manger a sign th• Arcl..le 8 Claim and to authorize the above listed distribution of TDA f.inas for fiscal year 1979 -80 Motion carried 5 -0 6D. Salary Resolutions. RCBGIUtfana reg4rdin6 salaries which establishes a comprcherslve pay plan for employees for fiscal year 1979 -80 Jim Robinson presented :he staff report Council expressed concern with the wording of Section 3 G., Educational Reieburaceen:, in Resolution No 79 -48 The City Attorney drafted the following "enrence to add to the section for ctarificaticn. "The portion of the total Vnm of 53.000 allocated to any one employee shall be determined bl the city manager " Council requested that the management and mid - management employees be antltled to the 6ducatioaal Reimbursement Program alto and to add this to Resolution No 79 -49 under 'other benefits " Nation: Moved by Palocbo, seconded by Bridge to approve Resolurion Nos 79-48 and 49 and to waive entire readings Motion carried 4 -1 (NOES: Nlkela) Titles and numbers read by Wasserman. Wasserman was r ^.estcd by Council to read the section entitled "Philosophy of Compensation" in full City mnrll Minutes June 20, 1979 Page 5 RESOLUTION t.0 79 -48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL of Tile CITY r OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING I RESOLUTIONS 78 -12, 78 -37. .L.Yn 18 -4. RELATING TO SALARY RANGES AND VACATION HOLIDAY AND SICK LEAVE BENEFITS AND ESTABLISHING REVISED PAY RANGES FOR ALL CONFIDL4TIAL. NON- M)IINAGEMENT, AMD C PART -TIME EMPLOYEES OF 1111, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 2, 1979 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C(=CIL OF THE CITY OF RAHCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A COMPENSATION PLAN FOR MA.VAGEIENT PERSONNEL, RATES OF PAY, MANAGEMENT BENEFITS, AND ESTABLISHING A PHILOSOPHY OF COMPENSATION FOR ALL MAlW:ElE7T/MID- MANAGEMENT EPLUYEES TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 2. 1979 philosophy of Compensatlort The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it - nepetos In a market place to obtain qualified personrutl to perform aid prov Wo ML iclpal services It further recognizes that compensation and conditions of employment must be sufficiently attractive to draw and retain qualified employees Therefore the City will compensate its emplov.es with wages not benefits rx-eHrtve with the labor mrket and commensurate with the performance of the employee proposed contract amendments clarity certain liability requirements to reflect the similar ptovisfors in the sheriff's contract and increases the contract amounts to include a risk management charge of 52 and charges for administrative overhead of 132 Lloyd Mubbs presented the staff report recommending that Council ap,.ove the contract as presented and to Instruct staff to develop a thorough acalysio of alternative maintenance programs wLth other organizations He reminded Council that the contract my be temiaated at any time with n four morth's notice Hutton: Moved by Polombo, seconded by Schlosser :o approvs the proposed contract amendments not to authorize staff to investigate altermtive maintenance pro- gram Hotirm carried 4 -1 (NOES: Hikels). 6F. RrsLuest from Alta Lom School District for release of SB-201 funds. L Rapnrt by Lauren Hasserm.ut. The Board of Trustees of the Airs Loma School District requested the release of $38.600 In funds collected through SB-201 pro- ccedlnt,, The District hav Indlc..ted that payments for two contracts stsuunting to a tctal of ".t 506 96 will be required vlthln tie next t'd rty to forty -five days The Sch. District had requested release of these funds at the June 6 Counc'I meeting However, the city did not have the details concerning flnarclaL commltnents and voted to retain be funds until these were received fits City Attorney had drafted in agreement which would hold thm city harmless If these funds were determined by legislature to have been tltegally collected. He also recommended that the Council make a datemimtion that this is con- sistent with the City's General Plan. Hatton; Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to authorize the mayor and city clerk to sign agreements releasing SB-201 funds In the amount of $38,600 to City Council Mill tee June 20, 1979 Pag. G the Alt., I,ma School District and to declare the finding that this Is consistart with the C tt y's General Plan. Motion carried 5 -0. 6G. Law Enforcement Contract. Report by Lauren Wasserman to approve the cootract with the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department for law enforce- ment sarvicen for fiscal year 1979 -80 tlntlon: 4oved by PaImbo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the contract for law entor,�ncnt with the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department for fiscal year 1979 -80 totalling $1,670.128 Motion carried 5 -0. 611_ Subdivlsinn Directional Sign Program. Report by Jack Ian who emphasized chat this pertains only to off- premiso signs, especially the 'bootleg" type signs showing tract locations. The city would approve the designs at those signs and :he locations There would be no cost to the city The planning staff had been wrking with the Building Industry to develop this program and tt had been approved by the Planning Commission at thair Meeting on June 13 motion `loved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikels to approve the off -site sub- division directional sign program. Motion carried 5-0. (Direction to staff was to leak Into a .ontract with a liability hold harmless clause 1 II 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. The Cit.- Attorney requested the meeting adjourn to an executive session regarding a legal matter 8. '.EW BUSINESS a Council: Palombo stated he had been asked by Standard 011 to represent the city at a meting in which future fuel allocations 'or tho city would be discussed. lie said tnis would simply be a "PR" position. Motion: Moved by Hlkels, seconded by Bridge to appotat Palombo to re- present the city at a meting with Standard 011 for the purpose to re- ceive information regarding future fuel allocations for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Motion carried 5 -0 b , \udlencN. L 4r Chuck Horton addressed the Council. He had sustained same damages to his motorcycle by Rancho Disposal Company He was asking Council to help him since he could not get a response from Rancho Disposal Council informed 4r. Horton that the city did not have any agreements with the disposal companies, and therefore, could not help him. 7 R i City Council Minutes Jenu 20, 1979 Page 7 9. AD IIIURNYEtrl. "mi(in: 4ovou by Palombn, sac.)nded by 4Lkels to adjourn to an Executive Acssiun. Horton rattled 5 -0 Public meeting adjourned at 8:45 p m. The Executive Session adjourned at n:00 p m. to the next rugular meeting to be held on Thursday, July 5, 19 9 Respectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk