Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/07/18 - Agenda Packet
AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting Carnel /an Elementary School Multi- Purpose Room 7105 Carnelian July I8, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE All Items submitted for the City Council agenda must be In writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. cn the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month -he City Clerk's office receives all such items 1 CALL TO ORDER. A. PLEDGE 10 FLAG. B. ROLL CALL hikels Palmmbo Y, Schlosser , y, Frost{_. C APPROVAL OF MINUTES: uuu.t Q4 j 2 ANNOUNC_IIENTS .ftt ,Mill n 3 COMMITTEE REPORTS ^� ` /f a Advisory Committeeu b Historical Commission 4 CONSEIT CALENDAR. The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non- rontroverslal They will be acted upon by the Council at one time w1thcur discussion. Pny Council emmbor, staff mamber, or interested party may request that an atom be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion a Approval of warrants In the amount of $472,430.12 Register No. 79 -7 -18 b. Action on the following bonds: Tract 8921: Release of bonds to Lewis Hanes of California Performance Bond (road) $46,000 Labor & Material (road) $23,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 11/14/77) Tract 9922 Release of bonds to Lewi• Hanes of California Performance Bond (road) $54,000 Labor & Material (ruad) $27,000 Labor & Material (water) S 8,500 (The roads were accepted by the City of 7/5/78) Tract 8928 Release of bonds tr Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond rcad $166,000 Labor & Material (rcad) S 83,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 6/1/16) Tract 8935: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond road $72,000 Labor & Material road $36,000 Labor & Material sewer) $IG,000 Labor & Material (water) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the City of 5/3/78) Tract 8949 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc Performance Bond (road) $1501000 Labor & Material (road) $ 75,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 10/12/76) Tract 8955: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes o, .lifornia Performance Bcnd (road) $62,000 Labor & Material (road) $31,000 (The roads were accepted by the City on 6/21/78) Tract 8956: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond (road) $80,000 Labor & Haterial $40,000 Labor & Material ((road) sewer) $ 7,000 Labor & Material (water) $14,500 (The reads were accepted by the City of 6/7/78) Tract 8958 Release of bonds to Coral Investment, Inc Labor & Material (sewer) S 9,000 Labor & Material (water) $12,500 (The performance bonds were released on 5/17/78) Tract 8961 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $112,000 Labor & Material (road) S 56,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/14/77) City Council Agenda -3- July 18, 1979 Tract 8962: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Band (road) $981000 Labor d Material (road) $49,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 3/14177) Tract 8977: Release of bonds to Shelley Investm%nts, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $54 J00 Labor R Material (road) $7/,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 12/15/75) Tract 8981: Release of bonds to R.L Stever- b Sons. Inc. Performance Bond (road) $126.000 Labor b Material (road) $ 63,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 1/3/7:) Tract 9009 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $106,000 Labor b Material (road) $ 53,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 10/4/76) Tract 9015 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $124,000 Labor b Material (road) $ 62,000 Labor S Material (sewer) S 28,50 Labor b Material (water) S 25.000 (The road! were accepted by the City on 4/19/78) Tract 9016 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Band (road) $60,000 Labor d Material (road) $30,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 6/21/76) Tract 9025 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc Performance Bond (road) $206,000 Labor E Material (road) $103,000 (The roads were accepted by the City on 4/19/78) Tract 9035 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $92,000 Labor d Material (road) $46.000 Labor d Mate:lal (sewer) $11.500 Labor d Material (water) $15,500 C. General Plan Amendment He. 79 -01A Strand /commonwealth A request for a change from the present designation of Industr.al to Service Cemnercia'i for property located on the southeast corner of Haven and Foothill Boulevard. Set for public hearing August 151979. d. General Plan Amendment No. 79 -OIC - Jack Sylvester A request for a change from the present designation of Mixed Use and Low Density Residential to all Mixed Use for approximately 75 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Haven and Highland Set for public hearing August 1, 1979. e GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 79 -OID - City of Rancho Cucamonga A change from the present designation of Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential for property located on the south side of Fcothill Boulevard between Baker and Cucamonga Channel Set for public hearing August 1, 1979. f Parcel Ma 4.908 - The parcel map was prepa"d in the interest of clearing Lp a confused access right -of -way for a lot in the Red Hill Area The applicant is Jack McNay RESOLUTION NO. 79 -57 .. .. .. . ... ........ ..... .... 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIT( COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4908 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4908) g. Parcel Ma 4�869 - The parcel map consists of 3 parcels located on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street. The developer is Caswell /Leveithal RESOLUTION NO 79 -58. ..... ...... .. .. .. .. .. 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4869, ( TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4869) INPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPRJVEMENT SECURITY ` —i{ 1-115 llc,' S -6 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Zone Change No 79 -05 - Coral Investment A zone change from R -1 to A -P for property located on the southwest corner of Baseline and Beryl Street. ORDINANCE NO. 82 (First Reading). .. • ., W .�.3. • 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 - 011 -63 FROM R -1 to A -P FOR 0 56 ACRE LOCATED ON THE SO REST CORNER OF BASELINE AND :sE�L STREET adi _'_ S -o /- n B. Zo a Change No 79 -06 - Westway Investments A zone change from M -R to M-1 for property located cn the south side of 8th Street, between Hellman and Archibald ORDINANCE NO. 83 (First Reading) • ...... w ••'}'••3 ......•••• 18 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 209 - 171 -07 AND 209 - 171 -20 FROM M -R TO M -1 FOR 18.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BTH STREET BETWEEN HELLIIN AVENUE AND AgCHIBALD AVENUE / �^ —C. Zone Change No 79 -01 - Alta Loma Properties A znne change from R -1 to R -3 for property located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archiblad ORDINANCE NO. 84 (First Reading), . UQ ... 1:• •�• 28 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 -11 -19 FROM R -1 TO R -3 FOR 6.6 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST AND ARCHIBALD fl nA AVENUES n G S -Ci �t....+tu --•� µ -� .�—..r / P C-. G..• -7 �-•C/ D. Amendment :u bign Ordinance To amend Si n Ordinance to clarify sign provisions for ShODP ng Centers City Counri! Agenda 44R ORDINANCE NO. AP (First Reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL r THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING xTICLE V SECTIONS 5 4.1 AND 5.4 2 OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE NC 65 FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES. —r, 5'p _c- 6 -6 General Plan Amendment No 79-02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga A request for an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan to remove and reclassify 7th Street in the area of Turner and Hellman and to reclassify 6th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -59 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 79 -02 AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELFVFNT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO REMOVE AND RECLASSIFY 7TH STREET ILL THE AREA OF TURNER AND HELLMAN AND TO RECLASSIFY 6TH STREET --_, , t'ld -U, s o CITY F'JUTAGER'S STAFF REPORTS Request to Form Consultant Selection Committee... Staff has sent requests for proposals (RFD) to planning consultants for the completion of the City's General Plan Staff is recommending that tie City Council appoint two of its members and request the Planning Commission appoint two commissioners to a Consultant Selection Committee for the selection of a consultant to complete the City's general plan Report by Jack Lam p Recommendation for Long Term Disability Plan for City Employees ... Report by Harry Empey ,tv, S O A eal of Staff Decision b lnte rated Incorporated re ardin .. an 22 ees on four u d n s ocat at 8786 Hellman Avenue iteport by Jerry Grant, Building Official --r, t_o 1911 Act Assessment - Proceedin s for Industrial Area Street Report an Storm Dra Improvements. y L oyd Hu bs n 7 ciTr ATTORNEY'S REPORT 0 NEW MjjI SS �y' 7s -GO a Council " b Audience 9 AOJOtT ENT RANCHO CUCANONGA gt 67 CITY OF N A M•E hARR M VEN • V E N D 0 R ...nCY R 7 -T 7 s 'o mcitT pQR ti INFO SVCS ED st, NARR DATE NET 996.50 9 RESOLUTION ND. 79-57 A Rr_50lJMM OF THE CITY C06CJL iC THE CITY OF PANG0 arAFOM. CALIFOMA, APPMIWS PARCEL. SAP MEER 499& (TENTATIVE PARCEL ILL? M. 49M) MMrzAS, parcel cap nmier 49M. submitted by Jack Wlay and cansfsting two parcels, located west cf Calle Castro in P.d Hill being a division at the Rd Hill Subdivision was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rar:cly. CLwzwn;a; and. WHEREAS. Marcel Yao lNumber 49M% is the final map of the division of land approved as sha n on said tentative Parcel 909i and. WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said Lity have now been met; WA, TP.EP.EFDRE. BE IT RFS VED by the Lity Cm=il of the Cfty of Rancho Cucamcrp. California, that said Parcel Yap !lumber 4903 be and the same is hrrobj approved and the MY Wruer is authorizd to • present ,ame to L^z County Recorder to be filed for . rd. PASSED. APPMED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES: I ssm: ATTEST: City Clerk r] yor 3 .4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 1919 TO: City Council d City :anager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL HAP 4908 The attached resolution authorizes the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the above mentioned parcel map This map was prepared by Linville- Sanderson -Horn b Associates in the interest of clearing up a confused access right of way for a lot in the Red Hill area There are no improvement conditions for this map filing RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached revolution authorizing • the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map and forward it to the County Recorder. r1 lJ Respectfully sugmitted, i L1oyd�B liubbs City Engineer LBH•deb u , L i l ■k PA i2G E L Jv\A P No k , 'PAR. I 4tD ✓.0 rs✓..+.r revs �— J r o 'p / PAR. 2 v•c,...T. nvwv ... IA �. :j In � . .• .. • i • C` RESOLUTION NO 79 -58 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4869, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4869) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVENEIIT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4869, submitted by Crowell - Levinthal, Inc and cohsisting of three parcels, located at the southease corner of Baseline and Carnelian Street, being a division of d portion of Lot I of subdivision "C" of Cucamonga Vineyard Tract was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on Nay 7, 1979; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4869 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS. all of the requirements established as prerequisite to loproval of the final map by the City Counl-1 of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement security by Crowell- Levanthal. Inc as developer; 0 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of 2ancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest, and that said Parcel Map Number 4869 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present samo to the County Recorder to be filed for record. L-1 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST City�Z1irk C Mayor • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 1979 TOT City Council d City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUB .CT: PARCEL MAP 4869 The attached resolution authorizes the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the above mentioned pa•cel The developer is Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. The map consists of 3 parcels located on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street. The map has been completed and is now reaQ for filing with the County Recorder The bond amounts are as follows: Faithful Performance (Road) $45,000 Labor d Material (Road) $22.500 S RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the amp and forward it to the County Recorder. Respectfully s bmitted, \� L oy, B. Hubbs City Engineer .if ��y TENTA T i /E MIT I of S[IS[S PARCEL MA2' N0. 4869 .tlp[I.TI. 1.6I.1241 n a ctn a [c'ao alpl04 enulo cwa., KM A WHIM a I W11W a tot I a=ISISIW T' a IK t)[ YlKIM •rnr �� lixt a fawn Sp pall V a WS 16t [S rt[ms a IK [µMt a Sn [ai = Sun a EM=lt lucMa rw.. •r. w. 1911 .0 nw.� 3 ir `ter �, i� _�� \ �.`f I i % •iii- 9 \ I I r w .... �' _ ^- IJ•�t.•1`l."� 1 / � f:LI'.':J 7I. IJi'A'r: GVfVI P/TiL O .•.. .horn ..wu r .... J JI S� ws Simms TORS V /C/NiTY HAP ' � g ORDINANCE FO 82 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI:f OF RANC1, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE20NIhr ASSESSOR'S PARCEL hHM- BER 208 -011 -Fa FROM R -1 TO A -P FOR 0.56 ACRE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE AIM BERYL STREET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOUS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and detominea the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a publ hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by 1". recomends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plat of the City of Rambo Cucamonga. • C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. ATTEST: SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezored in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby emended accordingly. R -1 (single family resldentlal) m A -P (adminis- trative professional) Said property Is located on the southwest corner of Baseline and Opryl Street known as Assessor's Parcel No. 208-011 -63. q 0?BTe11 be in f rce and elf' on Ylr t day fear it notion. i- PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF _ , 1979. City Manager Q 1 Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOri7A MEMORANDUM DATE, July 18, 1979 TO, City Cow.cll FROM, Jnck Lm, Director of Coamunity Development SUBJFZT. NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 79 -05 - Coral Investments - Request for zone change from R -1, single family residential to A -P, administrative professional, for 0.56 acres of land located on the southwest career of Baseline and Beryl Street known as Assessor's Parcel No. 208- 011 -63. ABSTRACT, The Planning Coccission, on Juno 27, 1979, recoraended approval of the Negative Declaration and Zone Change No 79 -05 for Coral Investments The subject property is currently part of Tentative Tract 9427, recently the subject of a Planning Commission hearing to discuss the grading practices proposed for the tract The Planning Camoission has approved the grading as revised by the applicant. The property is vacant. Existing land uses to the north, south and east are • residantial, and to the imediato went is an amproved office complex now under construction by the applicant. The adopted Interim Land Use, Circulation and Public Facilities Element indicate the subject property as Mixed Una Under the Mixed Use category the applicant has the option of applying for two categories of zoning, either Multiple Family zoning or Administrative Professional zoning for the purposes of constructing a medical office building. Director Review ?,a 79 -40 was approved by the Planning Commission for the development of a medical office building on the subject property subject to approval o: this zone change The southerly boundary of this zoning would be identical to the southerly boundary of the AP zoning now existent for the office project under construction to the west Originally, the subject property had been proposed as part of the residential subdivision irnediately to the south. However, because of certain lot configura- tions necessary with the proposed grading drainage plan of the tentative tract, this lot was narrowed and held out IC's narrow width and extreme depth made it undorsirabla for the devolopmant of Single family homes. Hence, the request for the zone change and subsequent development is a medical office building. The zoning fo- the property currently is not in conformance with tb� adopted Interim tend Use, Circulation and Public Facilities map. The requested zoning would bring the property into conformance with the General Plan Staff has made a field chock of the subject property for this environmental assessment It has been recently graded and has no vegetation on site. The Planning Commission iecoaaonded that a Negative Declaration be issued for the project. ® RECMPIFADATION. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Counci♦ adopt Ordinance No. 82 approving Zone Change No. 79 -05 10 E t ulty submitted, e. Jack Lam. Director of Community Development JL.BRHtcc Attachmentas Vicinity Hap Initial Study Resolution No 7"6 of the planning Comi.stion Ordinance No. 0 0 • ! 202-231 34 202 -23 -95 202.231.30 7 C J BASE 1 1 11 J I I i?08. 011•fo6 zoa-011•r'.2 • f— Ld cr- Q M, 31. 202 231 27 206.011- (P3 m N Np N N N N 1� r a r :r s� K I i 1 •� �I i LL{ 2041w1-P4 1 .t• 1 . `� L I N E; ;� v3 2OO. oil. 5S `•1 c L r • 206.011. 16 { x t N t i ?06.011• 49 j . -1 I' t K I i 1 1 CITY or PAN( 11g tnu m -wicA INITIAL STUDY J PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70 n0 For all projects requiring environmonlnl ravicw, thin form must be completed and sul•mil.ted to the Pcvelopment Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental A)taly.sJs staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The I+.•trb,pmrnt rrvirw Committee Will meet and Late notion no Inter than ten (10) days before the public mn -tini aL which Lime the project is to he heard. Tho Commi LLoo will male ono of three. determinationst 1) Tht• pro)oct will have no environmenlnl impact and a N,•gative I•eclnratlon will h,:. filed, 2) The project will hn••e an tnvironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Retort will he prepared, or 3) An additional information rrport •hnuld bn supplied by the applicant giving further infortnAtton concerning the proposed project. L c l't o5 •l � ,"� 14 sl Ll PROJECT TITLE, Profcasionat Ufhtc nod.hn� metiicnl Do, tor) APPLICANT'S SAt1E, ADDRESS, TELCrIIONr: Coral Investment•, Inc 540 q I•astdena Ate mc Glendora, California NAME, AOnRESS, TE7,EPIIONF. OF PLHSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: )or In,wt.,ti, c'o Inv LOCATION OF PROJE (STREI•T ADnitrS.c• Atli) 4SSESSOR PAI(CI•I, N0.) Southwest cornet of ..,.Cher ,,,o It,•,rl titnlT- 208 -011- 3 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSANY I'ROM 1.OLAL, NIGIONAL, STAT'F AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TIME AGENCY TSSIIING SUCH PERMITS: Emmticerine, RUIIJI „e and Lnroa.hmrnl I•rrm,n from L,IV of Nan,ho I -1 I3 L 0 PROJECT DESCItIPrIon DEsi;Ri PTZON Or PROJECT: tor.slru.hon o1 a rrofc.vonal office Building for doctors and medtca ux, , ACRRAGC OF PROJECT AREA AND SQVARL FIIOrAGE OF L'XISTINC AND PROPOCCD BUILUINGS, IF ANY: lotai cite area.- 14 500 a f. Cross area of proposed budding . S 2.�3457 —,-O rr DESCRIPC TIM ENVr RaNdE +irnt 41_I I r.n_ 01 'rilr rgO,li -CT SITI' INCLDDIIIG 1INFORtAT10N ON lorn0"Ai'llY, ry viTS ('rIICES) , ANIMALS. ANY CULTURAL, NISTORiC'AL Oil Fr•('t11C AFPFLTS, USt' OF SURROUNDING PI:OPCRTIE ^, Alto I+IC Iv1.= CILLPTIOtI Or ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND TIICIR VSE (:TTACII NECESSARY SIIFI ^rs) t Proposed budding to be erected on a graded pa-! winrh will be graded _ fn confuncuon wllh Tract 9413 No extshne v�lpnrn I. Prrrcm cn site Jack rabbits, squirrels,_ varies specie, c1 bird., and other an n.. ..1. Presently Chore s a Professional Offt.c Ituddmg -order con,lrucban ad)ecenl to the west. Is the project, part of a larq•t pro;cct, one of A srri,, Of cumulative actions, whlcl+ - +.h nr1:+ tn•lsysdually small, may as a whole have signifscatst envlrolwental impact? No I- 2 14 NILI. Mir Plaldl CT: YF.S fla X 1. Create a substantial in change • contours? g ground X 2. Create a nuhntantJal change in existing noise or vibration? X 3, Create a wul,•ttanl ]al rh,n7e in dtttttarnl for municipal rervicea fJolico, Eire, water, sewage, etc.)? JL A. Create changer to the rri•tin general plan designations? g zoning or X 5. Remove any existing7 trees? flow, many? .._ 1_ 6, Create the nerd for use or air.posal of potentially ha- ardvu^ eatcrialn such a, toxic substances, £Iar -ablcs or explosives? Explanation of any YFS answers above: A zone change apphcatien ffm 2-1 re A -P •ctz� ,,, ,m ttne _, IHPJRIAIr1•r If the project tnvotvr- th^ construction of residential units, Coml,lc•to the form on the next page, G CERTIFICATION: I hereby cwrttry Lb,t Ih� stetetsrnta [ above and in the attache) rzh Ufurnished d ,tt Frc ^ent the data aM information required for thie ,nitt,l eval,ta•lon to the best of my al,tlzty, and that ih^ f„1 •.1 nt••a.•nta, mvJ information pretented are tr„^ 11`111 cnrrcct to the treat of my knowledge and belief. I furtbrr und.•rstantl tint additional inform tion niy 1,� rrqutrrd to lee rulmittcJ Review nn mittee. evaulation • to be rude by the oc.,.,,q tmt Review committee. Date i� — /.3 -? CCnc Awe✓. /,:t Lq Signature Title Y ? 1 I -3 1 • RESOLUTION NO 79 -46 (F 1'1. n rltn% C.tsnn rA t S5 ion) A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING Ct PDIISSI04 RECOMHENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 79 -05 REQUESTING A CHANCE IN THE ZONING FRVM R -1 TO A -P FOR 0 56 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUnrWEST CORNER OF BERYL AND BASELINE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 208 - 011 -63 WHEREAS, on the 4th day of April. 1979, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th lay of June, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho . •tnga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1 That the sub„ect property to suitable for the uses permitted in the pro, P4 zone in terms of access, size, and competihility with existing land use in the surroundtng r,rea; 2. The proposal zonm change v..uld not have significant Impact on the envi•nr-.ent nor the surrounding pro- perties; sort 3. That the proposed zone changm is in conformance with the General Plan SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and has aasued a Negative Declaration o„ June 27, 1979 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1 That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cod:, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of June, 1979, Zone Change No 79 -05 2. The Planning Commission hereby recomends that the City Cr-:-.r41 opprove and adopt Zone Change Nu 79 -05 3. Inac a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be fotvarded to the City Council APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27th DAY OF JUNE, 1979 16 I VA . f PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopts' by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of June, 1979, by the following vote to-witt AYES: CMMISSIONERS: DAHL. TOLSTGY, JONES, GARCIA. RQIPEL NOES: COIL4I5SIO14ERS: NONE ABSENT: COIL41SSIONERS: NONE 1'7 • I 1 L J • ORDINANCE NO. 83 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, • CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUM- BERS 209 - 171 -07 AND 209 - 171 -20 FROM H -R TO H -1 FOR 18.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET BETWEEN Nr:INAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCJkMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Comiesion of the City of Reach* Cucamonga, following a public hearing held it the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and center prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with he General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • C. This rezoning will have no significant eaviron- sental impact as provided in the NCgativo Declaration filed herein. : Aa 'EST: SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map Is hereby amended accordingly H -R (manufacturing research) to N -1 (light industrial) Said property is located on the south side of 8th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue known as Assessor's Parcel Nos 20i9 -lit -07 and 209 - 171 -20 s :TF n full force effect at 1 m. o eh¢ 3 W e .wr ice c PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ DAY OF , 1979. City Manager �Q Mayor 7 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 18, 1979 TO: City Council FMH: JacY Lam, Director of -.omunity Development SUP -7=s NEGATIVE DECLARA^40N AND ZONE CiANGE NO. 79 -06 - Westways Invootments, Inc. - Request to change the zone of 18.75 acres of land from H -R to M -1 located on the south side of 8th Street between MalL� Avenue and Archibald Avenue. ABSTRACT: On June 27, 1979, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of Negative Declaration and Zone Change No. 79 -06 for Westways Investments, Inc This request was made concurrently with Parcel Map 5144 and Director Review 79 -41, botr of which have been approved by the Planning Commission subject to approval of this zone change The applicant is intent on developing a light industrial par), on the property. The site plan of development is attached as Exhibit A. The General Plan designation for the site is minimum impact industrial and the surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows (Exhibit D)r Location Zoning Land Use North M -R Light Industrial Building Older Single Family Residential South M -R Metal Warehouse Building West M -R Single Family Rosidential East H -R Single Family Residential, Rancho Industrial Park The applicant is waking the request for t,o change In zone to allow for lot areas and widths lees than those permissible in thn M -R zone (20,000 square feet and 100 feat respectively) As seen on Exhibit A the applicant is proposing lot areas ranging from 14,810 square feat to 75,719 square feet and lot widths ranging from 80 to 200 square feat. At the time of the Planning Commission there was considerable discussion on the lot layout proposed by the applicant The Planning Commission was concerned of the proliferation of this type of development throughout the industrial area However, they felt the development as proposed, and the fact that the proporty wac located west of Haven, whore large tracts of industrial do not exist, oitigated tnoir concerns. One of the m.7jor problems that was associated with this request is that the H -1 zone allows for commercial and residential uses along with industrial. The Planning Commission concurred with staff recommendation that a contractual agree- ment 14 made with the applicant and the City limitina the use of the property to Al those industrial uses outlined in the M -1 zoning district. Such an agreement has been made in the oast with Crowell/Leventhal Company and Vanir Development Co. Normally, the Commission and staff are opposed to such contractual zoning, however,* we feel that in the interim, until the adoption of a new zoning ordinance, this is the appropriate method for the City to pucaua. We have reviewed this application for any significant adverse environmental impacts that would result from the zone change The Initial Study prepared by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff and the Planning Commission rec end the issuance of a Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATIONS The Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt Ordinance No. approving the zone charge from M -R to M -1 for Zone Change No. 79 -06 Re ctfu ly utmitted� Jack Lan, Director of Community Development JL,BKH:cc Attachmentav Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Land Use and Zoning Initial Study Planning Comaission Resolution No. 79 -45 • Ordinance No. 0 ulo II! C' Q OR ff t t 7 [D orm r 1 mil! =[ G �! .i •t ow•;, t� t f� :I El Ll • s 0 N 0 2 a W P Y 4 J V r a x lv 11.eJ.. i Lav ZZ t.acomoo no o tvr:?c9a•OC•a •• ;:• .c': v. ( I I• ti. ' I 9 F li � OR . v II t f� :I El Ll • s 0 N 0 2 a W P Y 4 J V r a x lv ' I 9 t f� :I El Ll • s 0 N 0 2 a W P Y 4 J V r a x lv < < J -e - t -_ _ _ - - �•- _ of ` a 11 of ` 11 `. - ire C ^1e- C; ' `e - -t a ^d to "a )ttlon r9 la...rt t an, __ (.,)•ci s - -.`c4e t`e :•_bllc - .ertinq at Olicn ti _ e is to a },:ard. ' -e cc--.l:cee . ;il +: enc •.e ci t " -• Z. -i-a[ic-s: 1) --e oro,�ct will *ate no - el - • tai - act a ^d a e fl - ,mot .. _�.'a -anon le +1t - • r _ 1_..9, �r '1 cv t t'd -e • ,) - r- t - "•3 - -'•.,r rifer _..on ce- eer n nto rJ •t. • - L i ! =: - Rancho 3.:si.ess Center .,7 PL;i =•,7'S .:.:,g tD -'ASS, Te L--irio'.7;: Nestaay Invest^.ent9, Inc' 2770 South Harbor Blvd , Suite K, Santa Ana, CA 92704 (714) 957 -9277 , ^c ,S :;:chacl D. Todd, 2770 South Suite K ,•Santa ',na, C1 92704 (714) 957 -9277 7V 299 - 171 -07; .,,-V 209 - 171 -20 B c r -- r S ) Y ` r•. . It, I t:,, rj it 7 � tl. ( �3 I OF ?. CT. Ten concrese tilt- up-industr LaL buildings ranging-in size from 4740 sq.ft. to 14,800 so, ft, and _15 improved lots ranging in_size from 14,375 r -to 73 676 duet2ral parZ:- a�m`os ngs will be designed to ppresent an in- - Pliero with cobtlnuit acliglRe through — — colorCoordinatian;- integrated iarfd5caping and-exterlor design: AC ° d' OF - r, :,:EC T A.—r; :, � °!..:;. OF Ei.2a: ! :.G ,. O �::Y: Proposed bulldinga_ will rat12a in size 47400 s1B.75 ,a�oes _ 14, 80C sq.ft. with total building coverage of 92_2, - sq.ft. - P,rc Cq:i_ —dE t ^. /I =O \`•E iAL �E rTT`:G VP .::E PROJECT SITE - 11:CLJJ ^1G T'. ?L`= �TtCV C: TO PCG 7;.IHY, r7 :'TS CT ANI..ALS, ,1%Y Cl'LTi"LL9L, HISroi,IC..L OR SC_9TC ASP=CIS, USE OF S,Z:DL':DT':G PR37%4TTES, ACp THE CFSC22PPTOH OF AA1Y 'S :.':O 'i i -IR USE (A. ACFi GECES�tSY _18.75 acres of industrially zoned land sloping gently tg the _ 80 parse wee void of any vegetation or habitat for animals. sparse weeds on proporty ind no his-Eocioil- cu tural -or • -there aspectsd Along -the- horthorly-bcrder op wDr-2 y-- 171 -20 - -there Se a wind 7ow-of eucalyptus trees.- -- - ---- -- - Is tl.c et, i ,rt of a Iaruer pro of , .e ,ri n. hich Ilthocghe individually s.-iallg 'y " n `'o' -c `-vc sicnificant environ.-.cntal 1—act? loo- 14111 be- built- in-onc_phase _ I a i� F9 .A On Cart :t? -- _ X 2 C-u•c a .= s•ani.al ;e in cristing roise or vicrx ^_i;,n? It ':ft If the project invol•.es tle ro ^strl.ction .•f residential units, cc pl.,ie the fQnn on the next page. I rer[F -4 nT1ON: I in11')y rerti`y tilt tic st .te ,:nt9 C• r i° ' al.,vc .,nd in t`., .:tta,:hod rrhtbrts .3r,acnt the data and inrrt ,lion rccuir,:d for this initial c�aluation to tllc tout of y ability, and that the facts, staLc.ments, d in':, -t ion prctcctod are true and c—.rect to •`•c 1_ C e •y +nc -I ego and '•ellef. I farther in'erst:nd t'.tt lit: <•nal in'nt ,tion -ay Le requrrrd to ' a s :` itt,d tefore an aP., -. „ate rvaulation ran Lc -ice Sy the �•; .t ?evi cw rr mitt.: r„ W£STWAY INVESTMEN IINNiC. _.tc 5/18/29 - ------ $3S-..r.:n e_y: /�T""'^"" M President I ''_-r _ X_ 3. r:, ste a scl.sta -tial r:a .e ^ !e - -nd for cnic'�al ser ,as (_ -1 ` re, - lte_r, etc.)': t X 4. Create cixn;es in the e> ist:: g .::ling or general plan designaticns? _ X 5: Remove any existiny L..ce? v: 'a many? X 6. create the need for use or disMszl of ( potent :ally �•== ard�_3 - aterials s,, :h as , toric sv�scanccs, fla.- ±bles .r ,. :. ?loci •s? 7..pll nation of any _�_�5 a ^s• -ers at-z�,. The applicant will be requeatittq a zone change from M -R to M -1, a chanSfe which will— conform with the general prari 3eighaYlon. The 8IIc21yptus - [ wind row may need to be zemoVed -to provide for-the-orderly - developmarit 6`F iho property--7f -the property can be- graded - • satisfecWr, wiG o t ai�cEi g—EFie trees, on 'tho38'trets - in e s ree t r 9'£—or way - _ _ It ':ft If the project invol•.es tle ro ^strl.ction .•f residential units, cc pl.,ie the fQnn on the next page. I rer[F -4 nT1ON: I in11')y rerti`y tilt tic st .te ,:nt9 C• r i° ' al.,vc .,nd in t`., .:tta,:hod rrhtbrts .3r,acnt the data and inrrt ,lion rccuir,:d for this initial c�aluation to tllc tout of y ability, and that the facts, staLc.ments, d in':, -t ion prctcctod are true and c—.rect to •`•c 1_ C e •y +nc -I ego and '•ellef. I farther in'erst:nd t'.tt lit: <•nal in'nt ,tion -ay Le requrrrd to ' a s :` itt,d tefore an aP., -. „ate rvaulation ran Lc -ice Sy the �•; .t ?evi cw rr mitt.: r„ W£STWAY INVESTMEN IINNiC. _.tc 5/18/29 - ------ $3S-..r.:n e_y: /�T""'^"" M President I ''_-r RESOLUTION NO 79 -45 (P`4tar%%I% CDroma$1G0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAYONGA PLANNING Q • COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 79 -06 RFQUESTIM A CHANGE IN THE ZONING F.tCM N -R TO N -1 FOR 18.75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET, EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 209- 171 -07, 20 VHEYEAS, on the 21st day of Hay, 1979, an application was filed and accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 27th day of June, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Goverment Code. SECTION 1: The Ranrho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is Suteable for the uses pernitced to the proposed zona in terms of access, _ cize, ana compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone charge would not have significant Impact o4 the environment nor the surrounding pro - pertima; and 3. That the proposal zone change Is in conformance with the proposed General Plan SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cc:omission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse Impact on the inviro.nent and has issued a Negative Declrration on June 27, 1979 SECTION 3: That the Planning O�mmLsston sets the following condition on thin project: 1. That a voluntary contracteal agreement between the applicant and the City be initiated by the applicant limiting the uses of the property to those outlined in Section 61 029A(b) of the Zoning Ordinance prior ro consideration by the City Council NOV, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65950 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commis- sion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 27th day of June, 1979, Zone Change No. 79 -06. is 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that tho City Council approve and adopt Zone C ango Nis. 79 -06. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Rosoracton and refarod material hereby adopted by the ?tanning Caemtsata, shall be forwarded to the City CuuaCLB, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 14T9', PLANNING COMfISSION OP THE CM OF RANCHO CDCAIM Zat I, ]ACE WIt, Secretary of the Planning Commisatan of the Clcy of Ranchc, Cucaeangy. do hereby certify that the foragoiag Resofution o duty and regutarty faermflwaif. passed, end adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho, Mw2mangws art a regular meeting of the PIanning Commission held am the 2TQo d`ay of .Awc. BBPP. by the follaring vote town: r 15-7 G AYES: COMQSSIM MRS: GARCIA, JONES, DAM, TOL."10Y, REIPEE NOES: CO.- MISSIONERS: NONE 0 ABSEYI: COMISSIONERS: SUNS r 15-7 G ORDINANCE NO 84 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NIN- HER 202 -11 -19 FROM R -1 TO R -3 FOR 6 6 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETHYST AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCfD CUCAHONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held to the time and manner prescribed by law, reco�mcnds the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, ani this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recumms,dni Tuu b That this rezoning is consistent with the Conceal Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impart as provided in the Negative Doclars- tion filed herein SECTION 2. The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the roamer stated, and the zoning map Is hereby amended accordingly R -1 (single family residential) to R -3 (multi - family) Said property is located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald Avenues know as Assessor's Parcel Number 201 -19 is u11 be in fu are. a nIfect at 12rIIS3-yL- o theea r f optlon PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTITI Tn IS _ DAY OF 1979. ATT EST: City Manager ':a.or CITY OF RANCHO CUCARW411A HEHORANDUH DATE. July is, 1979 TD, City Manager and City Council FROM, .lack Lem, Director of Communit• Development SUB,7EL'f, AECONSIDEAATIO:: OE 'or GRANDE NO. 79 -01- Alta Lcm nzao°rtiaa Reeonsldorat,, of Cho City Councils' decision oP deniel of a request for a south Sid gof119thnStreeett between MothysthAvenueoand Archibald n the Avenue ABSTPACr, As City Council will recall, the planning Commission racemended approval of Zone Change No 79 -01 to the City Council on Harch 10, 1979 Th. planning Commission also held two meetings regarding the development of the propvspd property n9 a leg unit apartmsnt complex. prior to the May 2, 1979 City Council meeting, staff mot with the applicant to work wit the concerns that developed from Plan pleasevfind attached the Hate2 memorandum to the CityulManagerpand CityzCouncil- of the the of the proposed The City Council nas the following options en the consideration of this zone change request, i,q) Deny the applicant'9 reVast after a proper public hearing, ¢) Approve the applicant's request after a proper public hearlr7, �3) Continuo eonaiderntion on thl ito request until the problems Corms$ , has had the Opportunity that arose through discussion and revioo of the development plan proposed for the subject property If the City Council considers this action, this would indicate to the applicant a leaning of the Council to approve the project* if the problems that arose as a ,,view of the development plan by the planning Commission can be resolved satis- factorily submitted. ....f® Jack Lam. Director of Community Develop" - - JL,B%H,cc Attachments, City Council Hmorandum of Hay 2, 1979 /�q w d • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA MEMORANDUM Date: Hay 2, 197' To: City Manager and City Council From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subj cc;: ZONE CHAWE NO. 79 -01 - ALTA LOMA PROPERTIES - Change in zone from R -1 to R -3 for 6 6 acres located on the south aide of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald Avenue PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The property is presently vacant There exists a ravine running north to south along the western property lines which is a water ,arrier An existing windrow of eucalyptus runs along the westerly and northerly boundaries. The property slopes generally to the south There are two streets that dead end into the project, Gala and Hamilton. A locator map has been provided for your information (sec attached) . North of the site fa the proposed Vanir office - commercial development, S south of the site is the "lot ing mobilehome park; cast and war of the site are existing single family residences PLAN41M CO)HISSION ACTION: Th., Planning Commission hold two meetings regarding this item; one on March 14th and the other on April 11th The primary concerns expressed by the Commlsslun were as follows: I Drainage 2 Traffic 3 Nolse At both the Planning Commission meetings there was considerable concern expressed by the residents adjacent ti the proposed zone change Thei: concern centered around the compatibility of the land use with existing single family residential homes, schools, sewers, fire protection, police protection and the like It was the Cnmissions' opinion niter both mcctingq, that the applicant had adequately addressed these issues in relationship to the prornsed zone change In conjunction with the zone change the applicant is also proposing a 184 unit apartment complex. The Commission has act acted upon the Director Review for the apartment complex, but has requested additional detailed information be provided to address residents concerns The Planning Commission appointed a sub- committca to work with the appli- cant regarding these concerns The Commission may consider special design ® requests and reduction of density for the project as well as other critical review requirements but at the Director Review stage (actual project con- , sideration). KJ Alta Loma Propertle one Change Patin 2 We have at,achad the Planning Commission Staff Report and meeting minutes e for the Council's edification. It should be noted that currently the adopted Interim land Use, Public Facilities and Circulation Element of the General Plan depicts this property as high density residential The current zoning of tha property is R -1, single family residential and is in conformance with the General Plan Un11e R -1 zoning is in conformance with the General Plan so would the applicants' request Specifically the applicants request would bring the zoning into literal or exact con- formance with the General Plan. Slate law only requires that the zoning be in conformance with the General Plan. After considerable deliberation the Commission felt that theta were adequate controls that could be exercised at the Director Review level to alleviate the concerns expressed by the residents Detailed ablutions to concerns of the adjacent residents should be made at the Director Review level and not at the zone change level RE=NENDATION: The Planning Ca fission recommends that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance changing the zone on subject property from R -! to R -3 (It should be noted that approval of this zone change does not approve any project) + JSPeU1. submitted, � JACK LAN, Director of Cm=—unity Development • JL: BKH:= Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Minutes City Council Ordinance l I 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNCA • MEMORANDUM Date: April 11, 1979 To: Planning Commission From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONE CHANCE NO. 79 -01 - ALTA LOMA PROPERTIES - Request for change in zone item R -1 to R -7 for property located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the March 14, 1979 Planning Com- mission meeting to allow the applicant adequate time to prepare traffic noise and drainage studies In order to alleviate the Commission's concern regarding the proposed zone change. The following facts are now known: 1 Drains e: Presently Lhere exists a drainage ravine running • south south along the westerly property line of the subject property. This drainage ravine collects the drainage waters frog north of the property At the time of the development submittal, the City Engineer was interested in how the app11- cant proposed to deal with drainage requirements of the site development The specific method of providing for the drain- age requirements of the site development have not yet been worked out; however, based on the applicants proposed develop- ment plan, the City Engineer has indicated, that it is likely that a atom drain pipe would be installed along the basic alignment of the drainage ravine while still leaving the basic coof lgurstion of the ravine for the natural effect. This possible solution would meet the City Engineer's dralnoge requirements. Therc is not a drainage problem for this site. 2 baffle: At the March 14, 1979 meeting, there was assumption made by the residents, who spoke in opposition to the proposed zone change, that the stubbed streets, Hamilton and Gala, would be used for vehicular access Into the project site The develop- ment plan proposed with this zone change prohibits access from both of these streets and in effect provides a bnrrier to vehicular access In aJdition to providing landscape relief ITEM 'T' 3Z Negative Declaration and Zone Changr No 79 -01 'y April 11, 1979 Page 2 3. Noise: It should be noted that present code requirements all" a 15' minimum rear yard and allow t%V story homes. The appli- cant has provided, in his development plan, a setback of 75 feet from the property line to building and a 10 foot landscape buffer and a 6' masonry wall along the property line These ara some o: the ways in which roise can he mitigated Detailed traffic studies and noise studies, prepared by a licensed specialist have not been provided because the applicant chose not to do so However, more detailed information will be provided by the applicant regarding noise and traffic. Tnis information will be presented at the April 11 meetir.,. Concurrent with the applicant's request for zone change he has submitted a request for development of the property This request is on tonight's agenda and is know.. as Director Review No 79 -16 We suggest that these items be hoa_•d concurrently in order that the discussions may begin to center around sprcifies of a particular project - REMMEN'DATION. It is recommended that the Planning Commission allow the applicant to present additional information so that it may provide the Commission with additional information that can be considered In the decision- making process . ] pectf 'll subm St ted JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL: BKN:= Attachments: 'parch 14 Staff Report 2 3 • \J • 1 (�, T' CITY OF RA• 1 11 (11CV-119oA INITIAL STUDY PARR I - PROJECT I11rORMATION SIIEFT - To br completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all protects requirinq environmental review, this form must be completed and sul•n.t Llr'd Lo the Dt'v, lrpmrni Review Committee through the drpartn,ent whole the project application as made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envirolwwntal Analysis staff will prouara Part TI of the Initial Studl•. The Rrclrw Committee will meet anal Lake nrlion no lntrr than ten (101 days before the public mr,•r in 7 at :.hich tame the project is to he heard. The Conautler will mcd:e one of thror determinations 1) Tl:e pro3ect will have no enviaonmenLal impact and a N-1.1tive In•clarataon will r-• filed, 2) The pio3ect will have an :nvironmental impact and an environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report .bould be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed pro3ect. PROJECT TITLE: Windrow Villara APPLICANT'S NANO, ADDRESS, TELCPIIONr: 283 -9 NANr, Ah1111CSF, TFLEPIIONC or PERSON TO DC CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: John Nanavinn. f2131 377-6276, w /Neil Stanton Palmer, Architects and Planners, Silver Spur Road, Palos cr es Peninsula, La. LOCATION OF PrOJCCT ISTREE'r ADORrSS AVII ASSESSOR PARCF:F, N0.) South side o[ 19th Street between Anethvst and Archibald YareeI r2U2.11 -19 LIST OTHER Pr.PHTTS NCCI'SSAR•i I'ItOtl IlICAL, HYGIONAL, STATV AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERNNITS: None I -1 3q ■ PROJrC1' nrSClln rtotl DESCRIPIIOII OF PROJECT: (27 5 D.0 •s /err,.l Tt 0 var__ s ace, a Ogg lY of the Covered s aces arc directl in IUM a amts IBC project is tvi a Into several h community s ace. Y 1 1 u common an sLTape ACREAGr OF PIIOJFCT AREA AND SQOARL' RIOTAGE OF L•XISTINR AND PROPOSFD BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Site acre,ICe - 6.6 acres Proposed 184 units - 155,000 square feet L" DESCRIPI; nif, F'II °IFQNl!i:•rrA! 'I "I I'll Of 'I'Ilr' 11PU.I1:CT CIj,I, INCIAIDIIIG TIUVIIIl\TI0'1 ON )O[ vrvr!'F), ANItV,r S, AIIY CUI.TUn \L, IITSTVPIC•,L 0" kCll!IC AF PE(.-rc, USF OF GURI'OVNDING PrOPEFTIES, AND TIII; I•I;:f7RIPI'ION OF Atli EXISTING STRUCTURES AND TurIR VSC (AITACH NLCrSSARY SIIr1 -rS): the site for Windrow llillTee .l <. SLRfi.C2£loned. Tonnnr,.,ti;;nT lv ramie prop rty is Characterized ho .,...., ,..... -- ; —�"'�' o. aun aru nor tnwest from -lie site on Amethyst ages of the site A dim-- tianally there is a nnturar`d r, i.,,,. - ••- -- — -., .:.>„vu Is inverted and appSrenEiy contsoll Is the rroject, part of a larocr rrele ^t, one of a ser vs Of cumulative actions, which \lthuugh Indrvidu.11y small, may as o whole have sagr.[ficnnt envtrolvnental impact? yby underground and surface systems (i e., paved private . driveways within the truilcr park) 1- •2 ._ 3S • WIi_1 1:111S, 111C0.11CT: YpS M X 1. ercaLe a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. CrenLe a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! X 3. Create a sul•atantial change in domanF for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)' A. Create changer in thr eei•ting zoning or general plan dcsionation,l X 5. Remove any existtng tries! new many? 21_ _ X 6. Crcalr the nrod Ter usr or disposal of potentially 11.1 ardou, r ^'.••rialn such ar toxic substances, f:n T" gables or explosives? Explanation of any Yrs answers above: • that are preset uy ITT G eomnlianee with Ca Street s on eitner s I1FnKTA'rr: If the orolect involves the construction e2 residential units, cumplete the form on the next paya. CF.RTIFICATIAN: I hereby crrtifr Lhat the staLements furniahett above Ind in the attached r•.hilut pre• =ent the dntn and information required for thl;. rntltil evaluation to the best of r,y ai,llity, and tbal tit^ 'ul�, IaLrman L's, and information pr,-rented are Lr+a and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief I iurl.h ^r understand th1t ndditinn,l utfro - nation may 1r rr•Intrc4 to be sobmittcd before an ndc'luate evaulatton can Le made by U•e nevrlep.r•nc Review Committee. Date 20 February 1979 Signature �!ItildC�. Title Project P1Lnner T- 3 70 I9:F1 ht •;T JAI rn•y,•ri•l�n t•rl The folio tar inf0mation should ITO provirted to Um rtty „f Rancho t•ueamanp• P l,mninn Divisioll ut order to aid in aase •:c in•i th^ tl +ility of thx school district to accommodate the proposed re•,20ential development. traric of Uevclopor and Tentative Tract lie Alta Loma Properties Parcel. No 2n� -tt Sprtcl ;Sc Location of Protect: South side of 19th Street, Amethyst and Archibald between rliA d I I'll IT r ❑t, ^� , I'IIA ^.I A 1. tlu^+,ri •( single family units: 2. llm^bcr of multiple family units: 184 :+u;rs 3. 1)."•• prnposed to bc,iin consLruction: sc. pt 1919 4. i'++liest date of occupancy: June 1980 Ito l ^l 9 and Of Tentative 5. acdiorms Price Rance will d "arLet eanalysts now in progres termine rental structure. s A -1 2 Bedrooms + 1 -314 Bath 9 f 50 s A 2 2 Bedrooms • 1 3/4 Bath 950 s f Ir 2 Bedrooms + 1 Such 800 s IF C t Bedroom + 1 Bath 650 s ( T -4 3.7 m, 0 l `� •mod a�i Cdr l -- 'am Nvwcm*� I V .� +p• -.rxnm at {" OG W Z Q 9c a s ` � � I i 13R�J1c� 19 H_LDWV O 0 l r - O U Z Ll O� vu z O Ll.t of `' ane �1.13ddr - I --- •��� rrowsn-� I I I i �a Lu s L) I 1 , r ' -133 1r;, i.S7 H r� 0 a rr Gi ga • 0 RESOLUTION ;m 79- 23 0"6vinino% C45Y.M%=Ibrl, A RESOLUTION OF THE RAHCHO CULACUCA PLANHINV U COPPIISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL or ziiNE CHANCE NO. 79 -01 REQUESTING A CPANCE 14 THE 70NINC FROM R -1 TO R -3 FOR 27 5 ACRES IAICATED AT SaVYII SIDE OF 19TH STREET BETWEEN AMETIUST AND ARCHIBALD WHEREAS, on the 13th day of February, 1979 an APPI! ration van filed nod accepted on the above described project; and WHEREAS, oo the 14th day of (Larch, 1979, the Pln,ndng Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commis,inn hall aide the following findings: 1 That the subject property In suitable for the user Permitted In the prupn.ed +one In tern, of nere,,, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the a-frounding area; q 2 The proposed zone clmnne wo; Id u,t have significant • Impart on the environment not rile surrounding pro - perties; and 3 That the pfnposed zone change ,x to rnnformanct with the proposed General Plan SECTION 2: Tim Rancho Cueamungn Planning Camtln,len his found that tills project 1111 not create a sltadfleant adverse *rant on the environment and has issued a Negative Dcelaratian on March It 1979 NP.1. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1 Illat pursuant to Scotto, f•SR,n p. (15855 of the California f..vernment rode. tbtt the Planning Commission of the City of RanA,o Cunmonga hereby recommends approval on the 14th day of March, 1979, Lone Change No 79 -01 2 The rm ,,nine r'umn lsnlrn horeh, „•, ,.vnrruln [hat rile City Council +pProvc and adnpt Zunc Change No 79 -01 3 That a Certified Cup, of thin Rrselntdun and re- lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forvirded to time City Council 6 APPROVED P-99 ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF eIARCII, 1979 M I PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITT nF RANCIM CPC.L'InCCA 1 / • 1 Hetma,I Rempe)� ]is �rma ATTEST: J1 1 / I4 CV Setretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK Wl, Secretary of the Planning Cotmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution van dulv and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Comr:insion of the rlt% of Rancho Curawnga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission 110111 on the 14th day of Ilarch, 1979, by the following vote towit: AYES: COIIHISSIONERS: GARCIA. 701.STOY, JONES, NAM., RF7IPET. NOES: COIBIISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COIBIISSIONERS: NONE ON r 90 • • ORDINANCE 10. ' • AN CRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ARTICLE V SECTIONS 5.4.1 AND 5 4 2 OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE NO. 65 FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows, SECTION 1, The sign class description of Article V Section 5.4.1 and 5 4 2 is amended to read as follows, 5.4 1 Business Identificaticn (businesses not w,,,,.n shopping centers) 5 4.2 Business Identification (businesses within shopping centars). _ SECTION 2, 'xticle V Section 5.4.2(b) is amended to read as f�llowss 5.4 2(b)s Monument signs shall contain the theme name of the center as the predominant feats: of the sign and /or identifi- cation of two businesses If one businass name is used in a theme name, only one additional business may be identified If two business name are used in the theme nam, no further businesses will be identified. When two monument signs are used by a center, both shall be identical. SV1 '.OH I, Article V Section 5 4 2(d) is amended to read as follows, 5 4 2(d)s A center is one in which businesses and structures are designed in an integrated and - nterrelated development. Such design is independent of the number of structures, lots, or parcels making up the Carter. SECTION 4, The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the sam, and the City Clerk shall cause the sans to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in Tha Daily art, a newspaper of general circulati, , published in the City of Ontario, CalL73rnia, and circulated in the City CC Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this d y of 1979. AYES, NOES, ® ABSENT, ABSTAINEDs Mayor • CITY OF RANCHO CUCANCHGA !!DMRANDUN DATE, July 18, 1979 TO, City Hanager and City Council FROM, Jack Lem, Director of Community Dsvel „amant SUBJECT, ZONING ORDINANCE ANENDlDrr NO. 79 -00 - Administrative changes to the Sign Ordinance for clarification purposes As you will recall, the City Council recently rw'iewed an appeal on a sign ordinance issue relative to shopping center signing As a result of that review, the Council directed the Planning Commission to formulate necessary amendments to clarify the permitted signing for shopping centers. The Planning Commission, at its June 13, 1979 meeting, held a public hearing to consider such an amendment The Commission ban recommended approval of Zoning Crdinance Amendment No. 79 -00 as shown on the attached Resolution No 79-03 This amendment proposes to clarify Article S. Section 5 0 1 and 5.0.2 of Ordinance • No 65 The amandm +t is two fold, 1 It clarifies what constitutes a center, and 2 Row the monument signs my be used within a center. RECOMENDATION, The Planning Commission recommends, following the public hearing, that the City Cocncil approve Zoning Ordinance Amandment No 79 -04 as ahown in the attached Ordinance. �ipect ul 6ubnitted, Jack Lm Director of Community Dovelopment JLx NV, cc Attachments, Planning Commission Resolution No. 79 -43 Ordinance No. is RESOLUTION NO. 79 -43 (P�Ctnn1" LOMm1�j16r1� • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CQOIISSION RECOH 1ENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE ANENDHEhT M 79 -04 WHICH AMENDS ARTICLE V, SECTIONS 5.4 1 AND 5.4.2 OF ORDINANCE NO. 65 WHEREAS, on the 13th day of Ju:a, 1979, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: I. That such amendment is in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance 2. That such amendment 1s consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan - 3. That such ®endment will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. 4. That the proposed amendment would not have f sipalflcant adverse environmental impacts. • SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will net create a significant adverse impa_t on the environment and has recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration on June 13, 1979 9 SECTION 3: NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. T.at pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the California Government Code, that the rlanning w ®Seaion )f the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ramusends approval on the 13th day of June, 1979, of Zoning Ordimice Amendment No 79 -04. 2 The Planning Commission hereby remamends City Council approve and adopt toning Ordinance Amendment No 79 -04 rhieh amands Article V, Sections 5.4.1 and 5.4.2 of Ordinance No. 65. 3. That a certified cnpy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Cormistion shall be forwarded to the City Council. q3 6. That the attached amended Sections of the Sign • Oratnance becomes a part of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE. 1979. PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: !le=an Re=pel, Chaf an ATIEST: I G4 V t Secretary of the Planning Comisslon I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Comisslon of the City of Rancho Cucasonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Ca.iaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning • Comfsslon held on the 13th day of June, 1979, by the following vote to wit: AYES: C@MISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, CARCIA, JONES, Rf11PIL NOES: CAIMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CMMI SSIONERS: VAIN. `i q L] 1-• 2 M pY u C Y y N O J P fy y Y Y O Y V Y p U q Y p°e N Y V G J u 9 9 y V y J Y tl b V� O. O. � w° ^t 0 P A p u • „°• -n V" 6 y A •I C V N 'J Y° Y Y 8i C ].1 • Vl G `J .H,•A L 0Ti ,-il V.1 Y O A c P �' Y p J Y T i w b � Y Y "�� q% 7 Y n• O vC L Y C w V C� b p " v.Y.a °n N YNY n° e •� Y e ,�'•°� q�e e °, ^"• A O p Y O p O V '� H A q n L' C O. u ,yt9 fi Y] \ L u q u qq G V Y� •WiYO A V TH nI u]w gWAGV°im ° 9P84A Cew P Y V t A q w G C C 4 a O O A Y d qC R p Y u oc y ; A 6 y G O on " C tY i u b m < 3 b u Y pp S 9 0 c w•^i Y c 4 ( p y u x S p b 1v YaA OC tI m x a " A Gmw o o 4 GC's"° ®J NGMC G G " ti" u 4 9�• V Y u Y �' u w Y ti " q C d" 9 p 9 U vvm C e O u iY Y 9 i g SIC ' M O i N UW y =F Op Y MO O 7 nt M ° T"M M UU N J p H O u b U u lu-1 O 04 Y• u o Sox A V C y �• u Y b q ° "• •° u gg � a N O L p O M p 2 u U N M O u Y b p 2 M q 4 p° 6 q t UN w O V d q S i 4 w ° w U Y O d p u H u gn J "• " G (V Fi Y G •p C C O d Y O p' C L tl O q 41 •' 'n G U Y b m d m p V J w p V ° O J J T M Y .1 •• U W N• 9 s y y V w N u tl C G p qq U r%j U 'cO Y W W C Y u M p u C C u w O.J P M w �ie" T Y N 4 Y N L W \ 4 M N Y Y Y 9 M .•Gj W " el J N G u G•°, M O S� %o w � •V � A y ^ u u Y w v c w w G O Y u CeY CY O p w Y O N CdC O Y p9p N U Y Uh ° H 7• J C V 6J °u N ti 4 •! i Y •li �' � N V V M T ] Y in 4 r yy47 b C t`t 9M D N vH � U 1 a '•lC C 4 yZ Cw •}m J L 1 1 1 N 6 m w N 1-• 2 RESOLUTION NO. 7. 9 -59 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 79 -02 AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELE14ENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO REMOVE AND RECLASSIFY 7TH STREET Iii THE AREA OF TURNER AND HELLMAN AND TO RECLASSIFY 6TH STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1 That due to current development patterns it has become necessary to assess the adopted Spe-ific Plan for Seventh Street and to evaluate general east -west circulation between Fourth Strect and Eighth Street in the City industrial area 2 That based on detailed traffic studies involving the subject area and in order tomore fully encourage - integrated development of the region, the current adopted general plan alignment for Seventh Street can be abandoned between Vineyard Avenue and Rochester Street with the upgrading of Sixth Street to a major highway 3. To maintain through system continuity Sixth Street should provide a connection with Eighth Street on the west end at Vineyard Avenue and to the current Seventh Street alignment at Rochester on the east. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby adopts the following Amendments to the General Plan Circulation Elcment: 1. That the General Plan alignments of Seventh Street from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue be deleted. 2. Reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue. 3 Adopt Sixth Street as a Special Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue with a "S" connector north to Seventh Street and Rochester intersection and a connector directly east to Rochester. 4. Sixth Street shall be constructed to Secondary Highway standard from Vineyard Avenue to Haven Avenue and Major Divided standard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. 14('0 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of July, 1919. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk q-7 AYO'' L V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE[ July 18, 1979 T0: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Mutts. City Engineer SUBJECT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - CIRCULATION ELEMENT INDUSTRIAL AREA As a result of development in the industrial area bounded by Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue and Fourth and Eighth Street. The City requested that the Industrial Area Specific Plan consultants study a potential General Plan Amendment to the Circulation Element that dealt with the following isr.:es• 1. The elimination of the Seventh Street precise alignment. 2. Abandonment of Eighth Street. 3. Reclassification of Sixth Street from a Collector to a Secondary Highway. • The report concludes, based on a capacity balance analysis for a long range o' 5 proposed uses 1 Seventh Street can be eliminated. 2. Eighth Street can be abandoned. 3. Sixth Street should be reclassified. 4. Alternative connector should be reviewed for Sixth Street. The Planning Commission and Engineering Division reviewed the report and concurs with the basic conclusions with the following recommendation: 1. That the General Plan alignments of Seventh Street from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue be deleted. 2. Reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue. lJ 3. Adopt Sixth Straet as a Special Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue with a "S" connector north to Seventh Street and Rochester intersection and a connector directly east to Rochester. L4 GENERAL PLAIT AMENDMENT July 18, 1979 Page 2 4 Sixth Street shall be constructed to Secondary Highway standard from vineyard Avenue to Haven Avenue and Hajor Divided standard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue. The attached maps show the current and proposed plan with details of the proposed connections. Also, attached are minutes to the June 13 and July 2, 1979 meetings of the Planning Commission dealing with this subject. Major discussion at these meetings dealt with the issue of through connection of Sixth Street to the Seve:ith Street undercrossing with Interstate 15. In order to maintain options for the future, the recommendation retains two connections between Sixth Street and Rochester Avenue as shown on the attached maps. The alignments shown are not precise at this time and will be resolved when more complete land use and clrcu- lation tinformation iecomes available. RECOMENDA,10:1: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adopting recommendation 1 through 4 listed above. Respectfully submitted, Lloy Hubbs Cit Cngineer LBH:deb y9 • r -1 CJ May 10, 1079 - ,. 1, aiJF1 p� CIT•' OF RAt.6110 rl1CAM000A - COMPluniv Lfvftorpf;;r OfpF. Jack Lam, Community Development Dleec'or I,iAi j 1 1979 Lloyd Hub's, City engineer, City of Rancho Cucamonga., pq From: Stet* ColmarVtra.^s kwvc, t txeUuw Cather & Comp„ny8jN111211jYt31A1$16 John blayn.y, JON-, t \s3OQtstex !! SLDlcct. I'KAivc Network Around plc: ^a -Slaufpt Plant, honcho Clienmonge Plea -, SIWU (N, % maaufac P!.4ng firm,, has reque3to t'an1 %4 planned extension of 7th Sire ^e h,ouglt 11s nc�yp W� t ¢ Q±IQied. Pleuss- Rt3�,M S!•a Rsv r¢qursled lh.tt Ei;hth Su cot he C1HttJ ae.Wat,y ,u 5tte. This m¢itv"a;*Ai� ta•acs the Impacts of these proposaly, SdQ'tt;;l '3ant Des„•r[,tfoq I't—M-Slaufer pmr.viva to construct A %,.A it ^ on 80 acre p,reel shown on Exhibit 1. The plant \Wl front on 5th Street (mil t rescnlly conntructc J), v,th Mth employee p vkiq+, an+ tru: x scow.: pm%,.kd foxy; i single rntranee on 8th Street. The entrance will be 30-10Mmately In the middle of tha Mt. Tho plant Will putt Prize rock Ahich will arrive via the San';t Pe rail lino ndfoining 8th • Street t'he finished prvckhil will be 4^nasported b, truck Rml mo;•omen?% will consist Of tyro 15 -20 cat lraim each day. Tntc\ movements will include 20 -25 trucks at the plant per G1y. The tWl s•tt is a sewn dqy, \reek, 21- hourr,,y)• aperation. Fewer than 100 employees will ba 1119 J at tttie pint Approximately 60 will be m the dny shift, indu- dine 20 -2 gerial i Akers. Skelelat crews will man the plant at night. U Trip Generation in Area ^C• Rancho Cucamonga's indusirtal area has been divided Into thrt a segments for planning purposes. Area A is west of Haven Avenue; 0 extends from Ilnvrn to the Devore Free - tsny and Area C is east of the freeway. Trip generation In tadustrial Area C Is critical in determining whether a through east -west street is needed between Arrow acute and 4th Sheet. ,trey C includes approximatoly 1,500 acres Projcctioim of future employment dcas,tles rnngc from a low of four employees /ncre to a lu ^h of 12 cmpinyce%1acre or G,000 to 18,000 employees at full development The lower end of this is more bhcly than the Ingher end. -I- FO For land use type 140 (manufacturing), tlw ITE Trip Generation 11nnuni specirics n minl- mu 1 of 1.30 trip5/cmpt0yce 1d3y (TED), with an average of 2.17 YLD. A maximum rate or 5 4 TED was used In a study of the Irvine (rdn.trinl Prrk. U.In_ a pea's IV) [actor o[ � 16 percent, peak hour trip generation is computed as follows: Trip Generation Assumption • Low iledinn High Daily Trip -Ends in Area 8,340 26,0:0 9-,,200 . Peak Hour Trip Productions 1,334 4,155 15,552 The Primary users of the existing 7th Street Undercross:m, or the Devore Froceay would be workers living In the western portion of Rancho Cncamonp . A trip - length distri- bution carve (see page 3) which assttmes an average trip length of six miles, serves as the basis for a preliminary estimate that between 5 and 12 percent of those working in Area C will live In west Rancho Cucamonga. These workers will rind three surface traffic - ways — Foothill, Base Line, or the 6th/7th continuation — faster than using either the Son Bernardino Freeway or the proposed Foothill Freeway. Using the median trip gcneratjon assumption, 1,300 to 3,100 trips would he elided to the ADT of these through east -west trafficwa)s (200 to 500 trips during- the peak hour). At the maximum load point (Haven Avenue), the San Bernardino Cohmty Public Works Department 1976 study projected a 1995 ADT of 27,000 on Foothill end 24,000 on Base Line. An April, 1979, study by 11cston Pringle and Associates 1 at assumes major shopping center development In two quadrants of the l(aven- Foothill intersection pro- jects ADT of nearly 46,000 on Foothill cast of Haven, Without a through route on Gib or 7th Streets, the additional 1,100 -3,100 tripe would be distributed between Foothill and Base Line. While the throur.h route is not nbsolutcly necessary to serve Area C, deletion would cause service levels on east -west routes to decline tadess a lane in each direction could be added to Foothill or Base Line. Trip Gcwmtlon In Area'B` The industrial area between Haven and the Devote Freeway includes about ?,300 acres. Assuming 800 acres Is most easily accessible from the perimeter streets (Iiaven, Foothill, Rochester. and 4th), 1,500 acres would be served mainly by 3lilld.en Avenue and Gth, 7th or 811L Because this acreage B the same as In Arcs C, the same density assumptions produce the some number of trip cods as in the table " hove — 8,340 to 97,200. Assuming an equal division of this traffic between 5lilliken and the east -west route, volume could 8Pghro8eh 50,000 ADT on tM east -crest route, including the 1,300 -3,100 trips destined for area C. It is more likely that volumes will be less than 25,000. The IrofHc model now beirg Prepared "W narrow Oe range of uncertainty by more mrcfully documented Projectioos of future employment densities and by more accurate trip assi;nment to specific streets. In order to handle A volume opproachir . or r..ccedi a ' -3,On0 ,u1 T. 11v r'hst -wr <t street "Ill recd to be continuous between Ilavrn and ttoclv:stor even if no tl�rou�b taps were Projected. Attempts to serve Area D with cul-dc -sars or, loops would overload the peri- meter thoroughfares by forcing inta -zonal trips to use ltrrm. Any un(orscen d the er - ticas of employment that substantially exceeds the density avumption would throw such n system out of balance because adjustments in possible. routes to increase capacity Would not be -2- S1 s r i •M I V 1 J L fe O u U e 9 h O a so u e u c o y� c F- 0 0 0 c :.7 0 e u V rd MADE a7— —CATS JdCKED a7 DAH �I l Distance Range DISTANCE ins) of west A C to Area "Crr Note: Because west Rancho Cucamonga will include npprosimately one qunrter of the population living within S to G miles of Area C, the percentuges Indicated on the diagram must be divided by four to estimate the proportion of Area C workers making trips to west Rancho Cucamonga. -J- SD. 0 r, Analysis • rive questions must be answered before the City can respond to Pleuss- Staufer's requests. 1. Can 8th Stmt be closed without causing congestion or disturbing network continulty7 There are no apparent reasons why 8th Street can't be closed, node in fact, there nppears to be a general consensus that it should be, although needs of owners fronting on 8th must be studied further befnre the segments to be closed can be de,crmined and the liming of the closures recommended. Dut, It 8th Is closed and Gth and 7th Streets do not run through, cast -west continuity will be lmpalred, leaving no through streets between 4th and Arrow Route (about 8,000 root). 8th Street is immediately adjacent to the Sonia Fe mainline trnr0. The street Is two lanes wide and generally Is in poor condition. Because it is three to five feet below the grade or the railroad trnek, there are humps at every Intersection wilry cross streets. At several of these, sight distance is severely restricted for vehicles on 8th Street rind for northbound vehicles on the cross streets attempting to turn left onto Stir Street. Several need control channel crossings are at erndo. Spur trnoxs cross 8th Street to serve Industries to the south. In the future, more crossings will be necdcc'. 1' °ach must oc protected by flashing lights and possibly by gates. The cost could range up to $100,00n at each location. Bringing 8th Street up to standard would require raising its grade vxee to five feet. signnlizmg all Intersections with major crow streets. (inrlud.ng rrilroad pre -empt ct $10,000 to $20,000 cost penalty), and building several bridecs over ncod control channels. Such a costly project is not warranted because egmvitcrit, if not better, enst- west traffic service can be provided by 6th or 7th Street. Continuity at the rest cn I is not an issue, since 8th Street does not cross the Devore Freewiv. Continuity nt the w1.sr end can easily be provided by a connector road parallel to Cucamonga leash, betlrecn 6th or 7th Street and 8th Sir eet. (Sec Exhibit 4) 2. Can 7th Stmt be deleted without causing eongr_lton or distrubing network Conti .ulty7 With 8th Street abandoned, 7th Street would be the 1, oicnt allcrnativo for a thrcrq;h street, because it has an undererossing at the Devore rr. anv, n.,d as opprwmr•'cly Inlf way between 4th Street rod Arrow Route. n or ^oar ,sinn for 7th Streit be 1 vice, Jmcvard Avenue and Eta °sanda Avenue was prepared in 1772 and ',is be, n rdopted by the County and the City. It would be Icgical, but rut. >n:mr, to rvt^nA -, lit ran w '•. d'0..at. If not to the Dever, rrcevrny. Even if it were not a it •ouch st • ere 7th vonlu function as a collectoe street In place of 8th: treat. -4- S3 0. How should Gth Street be developed In the event that all or portions of both 7th and 8th Streets are abandoned? • If both 7th and 8th Streets are closed, Gth Street becomes the wily ValentinI through cast -west arterial connection. 6th Street presently tcrmrrutes at Ilaven. if 7th Is cot built, 6th should extend at least to Rochester. Thrce alternatives for a through con- nection warrant consideration. (a) A "T" intersection with Rochester requiring a left and right turn to Jog up to the 7th Street alignment and the Devure Freewav Undcrerosmg. (Exhibit 2) To provide additional capacity on Rochester to handle the offset intersections, Rochester should be widened to 6, feet curb- to-curb between 6th amt 7th Streets, with transi- tion areas at either end. Exhibit 0 shows a possible lane arrangement. (b) Build a "West Rochester" parallel to Rochester between nt11 and 7th Streets, but About 6.0 feet to the west. Rochester would not need to be widened. (c) Build a curved road connecting, 6th Street to the 7th Street undererosing, elimi- nating turning movements and allowing 40 mph traffic flow. (Exhibit 1) This 1103 the disadvantage of cutting parcels into odd- sluiprd sizes, but could be worked out with little disruption if property owners are willing to consider trades. 4. What Pmvisluns are needed for truck access to iuc rell3oiud freeway system? Industrial development -n the area will genernte truck trips mnmiv to the Still Bernardino Freeway. Truck access to the Plcuss- Staufer site can he via Rorliester from the clover_ ]cat at 4th Street and Devore Freeway, but trucks destined to the Sint Bernardino or Pomona Freeway probably will not use the Devore rreewny h hen hillhkcn Avenue is eater.ded north to 6th Street, most truck trips mny ^hvert to ;Milliken to reach the San Bernardino Freeway because the distance is shorter for the phedommant westbound dcst mahoas. 5. Should east -west continuity into Ontario be provided via Gth or 8th Street? last west continuity into Ontario car be provided either to Gilt Street or to 8th Street. 7th SSreet is not suitable, because it Is a residential street In Ontario and is narrower than oth Street. One solution would be to build n d,o^—d rond•vny nlorg the east bank of Cucamonga Wash between 6th ane Slh Strecic, E: 1' d 4 slhotvs that n 40 mph align- ment is 6:hievable. 6th Street could be turned to hnlemc^ the connector road at 0o degrees or the connector road cau!d intersect Gth Street at n0 d^gtces. The choice of ucst,;ns would depend on wlueh street would carry more traffic in Ontario — 8th or Gth. I he dceiston should be made Jointly by the t.vo cities. %lh Slrccl should be extended westerly to soloed to the 'to" i•mi•hcclor, whreh should be built to Secondary Thoroughfare standards. V till. connection is not built, IleOman would carry the 1lirough traffic behvrv•n GtI, and 6th Ste •els. This would esaeerbate the alrr,,w din ^crows sr!6l distance problem at Bill ,Ircct and licLmai„ especially for left turmn; vehicles. With the rnnnector road in 46 pine^ 8111 Streot could be obitidnccd cast of the connector and the IlcaranN8th Slrccl ,rtcrsectwn need not be rebut t. -5- 5_q The feasibility of constructing the connect. r will depend, in Part, on lho plans of affected landowners who can develop when Cucamonga Wash impro temcrts are com- plete. A decision need not be made before the question or deleting 7th Street cast or n Haven Is resolved. Summary of Conclusions — "th Street need not be continuous through the Plcuss- Staufer site. — 8th Street can be abandoned. -- An additional east -west roadway is necessary between Arrow Route and 4th Street. — 6th Street is the most logical east -west connector. it should be conoected to 8th Street at the west end and to 7th Street at Rochester at the cast end. Until the traffic model fol the Industrial Area Specific Plot, is In operation and nvnilable for more precise analysis, any development approvals should provide for dedication of a 116 foot right -of -way allowing six moving lanes (including IG foot lanes adjoining the curbs) and a continuous turn lane. If the model indicates that no more than four lanes are likely to be needed, the right- of -wav could be narrowed to 92 feet. Additional right -of -way should be provided of intersection, with major worth -south streets to allow for future double turn Inner that may be needed. — Three alternative eonn.ctor alignments are pc:.;iNc at the ra;t end ur 6th Sit COL. A direct connection (Exhibit 1) or o "lVest Rochester" are preferable to n widened Rochester (Exhibits 2 and 3) for access, traffic operations, capacity, and safety reasons. 6 .I L -G- SS o v O � - N I to W .I I � I• j J �� I.�a � � � N I l a N i S ci «�nsar± mar_ � z i I I f -I t3 �I t\ s� I 1 III 1 n I I 1 r1- I a I1 `a Qi 114( ; I - ,as _ -i •' •� -• - 1 w � V A - 1 � •I I 1 1 I 1 r day • _ 1 " r:l r IN �i lu Y ` _ Or \9 � 57 �XHIPIT ��• 4� • i '1.a�!' MA01 6T � Z • _nAR . tcxso eT r •OAR / 1 il�,tl A • '� M[L N t Lt- 0— •r— o:N. S7- I��f•Il� 'I I See Conclusions for discussion ' of street width. H �I v� uic Frcc �Y.11/317- VR 11 1' � 41 � I ,�•• v `�}I iii � • • J :�• rl: o,,sza„•... a x � I /•[.[.�II.r I •� \ ...I.. ai rL. { 1 1 y i air' �D nc t ' ✓ ^� ' '•• ji / v a jt AIL N r cc I ml; `� e' �:'�.1" /w�sA'd"ir�' _ O 171r .. .�3'Q.9b w• II � � � J•'r .v�t� � 'P'• } \ vin 4 � t�l �I I- 1M1 a ,, r-AL 131T 'ma=r Commissioner Tolstoy indicated this is a step in the right direction for the City. Chairman Rompel stated that it should be made clear whit} streets will be main- tained under the district to avoid confusion. Commissioner Garcia stated he supports the concept of parkway maintenance However further study is needed as to what the program is actually going to entail. He Would also like to know the parameters and boundaries of the plan and •hather or not the entire City will eventually be Included Mr Lam indicated the boundary for the landscape maintenance district :o the current city limits. Areas of the City are not proposed at th!s time tc, be sectioned off. Any tract that wants to be included In the district can do so. Staff needs to know whether or net the Commission and Council support ttis concept before the details of the program are developed Chairman Rempal stated alternativa types of fundin6s needs further o:.amination to reflect an estimated future total for the entire city. A Motion was made by Comissioner Jones and seconded by Comisr&oner Tolstoy to approve the concept of a landscape maintenance district and : street lighting district with a mare detailed report to come back to the Commission for review in the near future. AYES: JONES, TOLSIM. C &CIA, REMPEL • NOES: NONE WENT: DAHL GENERAL PLAN AMEhTLMEH-, - CIRCULATION ELEMENT INDUSTRIAL AREA Mr Lam stated this report in for information purposes only. The issues raised by the Commission that are not answered tonight will be fully addressed at the time of the public hearing Mr Paul Rougeau, Assistant Civil Engineer, revieutd the staff report and the Consultants Reports in derail, these being on file in the Planning Division Staff recommends that the Commission receive and file the Consultants report and schedule hearings for Amendmertt of the General Plan Circulation Element for June 27, 1979. Mr Morin stated there would be some concern from the property owners near Rochester if 6th Street were to go througn and curve through their orapertics as it would limit use of their properties. Chairman R ®pal wondered if there are portions of 7th Street going cast from Archibald that need to carry through. Hr DSIorio stated the area between 7th and 8th Streets seems to be attractive for large scale distribution centers which should take up the entire area This would make it impossible to bring 7th Street through His only concern Planning Commission Minutes _8- Jvne 13, 1979 w Is the continuation of 6th Street through to Rochester where it curves through the properties This p:ooina needs to be worked out Rochester serves as a frontage road for the freeway any 4th Street is the main m /off ramp to the freeway from the industrial area. ?It Im stated prior to the next meeting staff will explore the connections necessary for good circulation. It was the concersus of the Commission that a public hearing be set for June 27, 1979 to discuss the Circulation Element of the General Plan and further requested that staff bring back further information concerning traffic connec- tion3. e e a e e Dun to the 11 pm, adjo, sent time, a motion vas made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commisaiwner Jones and unanimously carried to continue with the Agenda. SIGN PROGRAM FOR TRACT DEVELOPMENTS Barry Hogan reviewed the staff report in detail He indicated a revision should ba made to Section I1 -F to state wlnerys and historic sites shall be required to pay a fee to Fur up a placard on the sign structure Staff recom- mends that the Commission support the program a3 outlined and that such a recoarmendation be forwarded to the City Council After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Garcia and seconded • by Commissioner Rmpel to support the program with the change to Section II -F as indicated above and that this reccmmendat.on be forwarded to the City Council AYES: GARCIA, HEMPEL. JONES, TOLSTOY IMES: NONE ABSENT: DAHL f a a a s REPORT RECARDItL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer, reviewed the staff report in detail Staff recommend, that the CommlSsion recommend to the City Council adoption of the Capital Improvements Program and long range priorities as submitted A to Hotion was made by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Garcia as subm ®adoption the Capital t d and that suchrecomme dationobee forwarded rto the City Councilrforit lea their consideration. AYES: TOLSTOY, GARCIA. JONES, HEMPEL WES: ERNE ABSENT: DAHL e, see 0 Planning Commission minutes _9_ June 13, 1979 61 Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes July 2, 1979 NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND GENERAL PUN AMENDMENT F0. 79 -02 - CITY Or RANCHO CUCAHONGA - A request for an amendment to the Circulation El of of the General Plan to remove and reclassify 7th Street in the area o! Turner and Helhaan and to reclassify 6th Street. Paul Rnugaau, Assisrant Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report. Staff Avenuuee besdeleted;grreeclassify Street Streetrto Vineyard Heel r Hellman Eighth Street tor Avenue; Haven dopt Sixth Street as a Special Boulevard it= Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue with an "S" connector north to the Seventh and Rochester intersection and a connector directly owner Rochester. of iniicated ho has been contacted by the mtlor prop sty tie "S" rnrmector who indicated he is tut opposed to the "S" connector as pro- posed. ,. man Rempel asked for questions from the Commission if the staff. Commissioner Tolatoy asked why the designation for a special boulevard we not taken all the way through the city. en Hr Rougeau indicated they expect quite a traffic drop off war be either Avenue. Therefore 6th Street from Haven Avenue is pro,] secondary or collector. Commissioner Garcia asked if 6th Strecc from Vineyard to Haven will have four lanes of travel and to the cost of Haven will be 6 lanes. Lloyd Rubbs stated that to correct. Commissioner Tolatoy stated better east /west circulation will be needed in the City as ve continue to grow. He sees no reason why 6th Gtreet couldn't He ha-sa g of akesaurepwe will have g odreast /vestrcorridors In the •future Avenue. and Vineyard Avenue does have access to the Ontario Airport and the Freeway Commissioner Garcia asked if the Commission is in gereral consensus in support of the abandonment of 7th Street. Chairman Rempel stated Seventh Street is to be a collector street betwuen Hallman Avenue and 1Lrner Avenue. Paul Rougeau stated staff is recommending that 7th Street be deleted from the General Pln. That portion toa o be shown one the oGeneralsPlan s %elltbee the iarenebetween Hell vne y and Turner Avenue. Chairman Hempel opened the public hearing 4 After general commentc. Chairman Rampal closed the public hearing. (0 1z Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes July 2, 1979 Page 2 A Motion was mado by Commissioner Carol& and seconded by Cammissiuner Tolstoy to • approve Resolution No. 79 -52 deleting the alignment of Seventh Street from Vineyard Aveaua to Rochester Avenue; reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue; adept Sixth S.reet as a f,ccial Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue with an "S" connector north to the Seventh and Rocbeater intersection Fad a connector dirently east to Rochester. AYES: GARCIA. TOLSTOY. JOM, Dj4HL, REETEL NOES: NONE ARSENY: NONE • (0-2 i RESOLUTION NO. 79 -52 06ntttnq Co"WAut6i%) A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING O CC1HHISSION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 19 -02 AMENDING THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO RELIVE AND RECLASSIFY 7TH STREET IN THE AREA OF TURNER AND HELLhA.N AND TO RECLASSIFY 6TH STREET WHEREAS, on the 27th day of June, 1979, the Rancho Cucamonga Planring Commission held a meeting to consider the above described Amendment and said project was continued to July 2, 1979 WHEREAS, cn the Zed day of July, 1979, the Rancho Cucamonga Planniug Commission reviewed the Amendment. NOW. THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been mado: 1. That due to current development pat Guns it has become necessary to "seas the adopted Specific Plan for Seventh Street and to evaluate general east -west circulation between Fourth Street and Eighth Street in the City lndustrial area 2 That based on detailed traffic studies involving the subject area and in order to more fully encourage integrated development of the region, the current adopted general plan alignment for Seventh Street can be abandoned between Vineyard Avenue and Rochester Street with the upgrading of Sixth Street to a "Jet highway. 3. To maintrin through system continuity Sixth Street should provide a connection with Eighth Street on the vest end at Vineyard Avenue and to the current Seventh Street alignment at Rochester on the east. SECTION 2: That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recotmends to the City Council that the General Plan alignment of Seventh Street from Vineyard Avenue ro Rochester Avenue be deleted; reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue; adopt Sixth Street as a Special Boulevard from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue with an "S" connector north to the Seventh and Rochester intersection and a connector directly cast to Rochester. (0 Li APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ND DAY OP JULY, 1979 PLANNING C0.MSSIOH OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA • BY: CR Ile an Reropol, C airxaq E ArTPSr: ajj Secretary of the Planning Coaedsaion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Co=isslon of the City of Rancho Cucaoonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolut.on vas duly and regularly Introduced, pasoed, and adopted by the Planning Coemission of _ the City of Rancho Cucamnga at a regular cleating of the Planning Consofssion held on the 2nd day of July, 1979 AYES: COEMISSIONERS GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, RDIPEL NOES: COEMISSIONERS: NONE ABSE4T: CO:MISSIONIRS: NONE (4S Ll • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: June 27, 1979 To: Planning Commission From: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - CIRCULATION ELEHENr INDUSTRIAL AREA The proposed amendment before the Commission is for the adoption of an east -vest route across the industrial area between Arrow Route and 4th Street The issues to be considered in the choice of the route are: 1. The elimimtioa of the Seventh Street precise alignment; 2 The abandonment of Eighth Street east of Haven Avenue; 3 The adoption of a Sixth Street routing from Vineyard Avenue to Rcchester Avenue • The Industrial Area Specific Plan consultants have submitted preliminary reports concluding that the above "issues" could be adopted as Specific Plan elements The Engineering Division has identified the following items, from both the Censuitant'a report and staff research as being of importance in the consideration of the route adoption: 1 The area east of the Route 15 freeway, served by the under - crossing at 7th Street, will generate about 3000 trips per day from west of the freeway 2 The area between Haven Avenue and Rochevter Avenue will generate from 20,000 to 50,000 trips per day along the eastwast route, with a volume less than 25,000 most likely. 3 The proximity of 8th Street to the Santa Fe Railroad track seriously impairs its function as an east -west through route. 4. Basic bridge construction costs have been provided at Deer Creek for 6th Street and 8th Street but a bridge on 7th Street would be funded entirely by the City 5 A portion of the street improvements on the north side of 6th Street between Archibald and Turner Avenues have been Installed at collector standards. IMI "fill (0 w GENERAL PLAN ANEh -iENr CIRCULATION ELEMENT INDUSTRIAL ARIA June 27, 1979 Page 2 • 6. 8th Strcet serves existing residential and insutrial aevelop^ent between Vineyard Avenue and Haven Avenue and near Rochester Avenue. 7. 7th t now exists only between Hellman and Archibald Avenue &. 8. Extension of 7th Street directly vest beyond Hellman Avenue Is not possible. 9. Traffic vc_uaes on a through route of 30,000 or mote would require a 6 -lane street. The Engineering Division in considering the above data has made the fol- lowing findings regarding circulation in the industrial area: 1. Seventh Street should be maintained In the General Plan as a Collector between Hellman Avenue and Turner Avenue to provide for current and pandiag development. Other portions of 7th Street can be developed to serve local areas. 2 Eighth Street should be maintained as a through route (not • on General Plan) and not be abandoned until such time a Sixth Street has been completed between Haven and Rochester. Portions of Eighth Street will have to be retained permanently to serve . sting development 3. Sixth Street would provide a satisfactory though route A connection with Bch Street on the vent .nd can be provided along Cucamonga Creek. On the east end, an "S" shaped connector routing traffic north to the existing 7th Street intersection with Rochester Avenue can be provided. In addition, 6th Street should be extended directly "at to Rochester to provide for the eastbound to south- bound (and reverse) move. This connection can be built Imedlate7y upon the development of the large Pleuss- Staufer site, providing access to the site while the option of the "S" connector remains available (refer to the attached sketches) Then portion of 6th Street between Haven and Rochester should pro - vi�e fo. Special Boulevard development with a 120' right -of -way. Additional right- of-way should be obtained at mayor intersections. The precise alignments at each end and the exact right -of -way require - menrs should be postponed until completion of more detailed traffic stuales. • (P -7 CCNERAL PLAN ANEh7 —,NT CIRCULATION ELEMEI— INDUSTRIAL AREA June 27. 1979 Page • RECOMENDATION: Delete the aligment of Seventh Street from Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue; reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between 8th Street and Turner Avenue; adopt Sixth Street as a Special Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue with an "S" connector north to the Seventh and Rochester intersection and a connector directly east to Rochester. Respectfully submitted. C d 71, y iWB. HUBBS, City Engineer LEH:PR :m Ll GENERAL PLAN A IMN Ni CIRCULATION EL121S1.. INDUSTRIAL ARLA Ju.c 27. 1979 Page 7 RE00MMEWATION: Delete the alignment of Seventh Street frm Vineyard Avenue to Rochester Avenue; reclassify Seventh Street to a Collector between 8th Street and Turner Avenue; adopt Sixth Street as a Special Boulevard from Haven Awenuo to Rochester Avenue with an "S" connector north to the Seventh and Rochester intersection and a connector directly east to Rochester. Respectfully submitted, LL( B HUBBS. City Engineer LBH:PR:m • • o I11 "! 3 G� J � :1'.Sir'l 143' 1 1 N Yf'P�I• . a• 1 m (act m wft ' 1. %.• I. �/ � ��: iii• '$I `t .�; � C 1� 8 III ' '7• ?.��� � F FUN F 3 G� J � :1'.Sir'l 143' 1 1 N Yf'P�I• . a• 1 m (act m wft ' 1. %.• I. �/ � ��: iii• '$I `t .�; � C 1� 8 C 1� 8 r7ii, s 11 fw�OiR.w. H .�_ �r `•+ lr,ro�� s 11 fw�OiR.w. H O =f✓, i Z- : -� +.r o-•wn 0 9 �r `•+ lr,ro�� � 1 +MY� '.•R O =f✓, i Z- : -� +.r o-•wn 0 9 �r `•+ lr,ro�� O =f✓, i Z- : -� +.r o-•wn 0 9 IIII _I_•I� YL - �.� J 1: I ku i,: j j ' r I 5 a' N It li ( `I ACT /-�1 i I 1• I � ( (I t a — — �•{- -' -- TI— • -- — it - -- _�r- -� t\ ' »�. Z I t I I ems - QN� � tl 1 � r1 r o � 1. mac I Jt %/- ✓// of q t� N rl ;Mid. I Jt %/- ✓// of q t� N Z t r T '1' lJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1@9RANDUM DATE: July 18, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE Staff has sent requests for proposals (RFP) to planning consultants requesting their proposals for the completion of the City's Central Plan. Copies of the RFP describing the scope of work have been sent to you under a separate memo. Because of the scope of work requested and the importance of the selection process, staff recommends that the City Council consider appointing a consultant. selection committee to interviuw finalists and mako a final selection of the consultants The RFP requires that all proposals be submitted to the Community Development Director by 5:00 p m. July 27, and consultant Interviews are scheduled for friday. August 17 in the Library Conference Room. The number of firms selected for interviews will dopend upon the number of proposals submitted and must await final determination, however, the Library Conference Room has been reserved in advance for the entire day. If the Council concurs with the concept Of a eansultant selection committee, staff suggests two Council members, two Planning Cowmissioners and staff for the committee make up RECO.MDENDATION: Staff reca ®ends that the Ci.y Council appoint two of Its members and request the Planning Commission appoint two Comlesloners to a Consultant Selection Committee for the selection of a consultant to complete t.a City's General Plan Respe� fully bm tted, Jack I=. Director of Community Development JL:cc 13 • M E M 0 R F N 0 U M TO: Council FROM: Finance Director SUBJECT: Long Term Disability Quotes for lontl term disability are in and have been reviewed by staff with the resultant recommendation The City gas fortunate to have a quote submitted by the company that carries its life insurance which caused the quote to be lower than what was submitted by other companies Usually when an insurance company submits a bid on long term disability they aslo include in their bid a life insurance program. In fad some companies will not write long term disability without life insurance. eThe lowest tid was submitted by Bankers Life Insurance Company of .967 per $100.00 salary with a thirty day elimination period. The premium is guaranteed for one year, and will produce a first year cost of S8000.00. Other quotes ranged up to 51.85 per $100.00 salary. 0 Staff recawendation is to award Bankers Life Insurance Company the long term disability program far the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 0 TELEGRAM FRO" WESTERN UNION /July 12. 1979/12 23 p.m. City :tanagers Offict Re: Permit Status.878G Rellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA We are respectfulll petitioning the Honorable Hayor and City Council to waive the plan check requirements and issue our permit on the basis of the correction sheet already performed by the San Bernardino County enginzers nne to the fact that the required fee and information were submitted it February, 1978 to the County of San Bernardino He arc requesting that this be added to the agenda of the next City Council meeting on July 18. Back up information is being posted today. Dewain R. Butler 15202 Downey Paramount, CA 90723 11 0 -76- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 12, 1979 TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: Hellman Industries - Inct, rated Incorporated 8786 Fellmar Ave. - 4 Buildings The applicant for the above p oject has requested that an exception be granted for payment of new p'an checking fee:. The plans for the buildings were first filed with San Bernardine Building and Safety Department approximately Jan. 1, 1978. For reasons unknown, building permits were never obtained, even though portions of the plan checking were accomplished in April of 1978 and in August, 1978 On July 9, 1979, new plans were presented to Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Division, requesting that we accept the pla.is as checked by the county end that the plan checking Ofees, paid at time of original submission, be considered as payment The applicant was aJvised, based on Section 103(c) of the Uniform Building Code (copy attached), and p•evinus opinions of the City Attorney, that new processing woulr be required and new plan ci•cking fees paid Also, if. this particular case, no alternative cho' was available, the time lapse having exceeded one year. The time limitatiln for expiration of plan check is intended to enable enforcing agencies to terminate their records, rather tnan continue them indefinately. Additionally, issuance of permits based upon plans that may no longer comply with ordinances or regulations since revised, is not practicable, and recheck without charge would be unfair to developers who have paid renewal fees in the past It is the recommendation of the Building and Safety Division that the request be denied, because approval would be contrary to the requirements of the Uniforc. Building Code, would establish an unadvisable precldent regarding past and future permit and Dian check renewals and would create enforcement problems in field inspection or duplication of effurt in the plan checking process without reimbursement. er ry Gran Building Official JRG:jh 76 s•, Mi r 7 C 703003 UNIFORM KPLOINO CODE Where plans are Incomplete, or chansed to as to require additional plan- clicking, an additional plan<hck fee %W be charged at • rat# pt ab. Ot1e `(y d E•pin0oe of Plan Chat Applications for which no permit V 130 days upon wd0en request by the applicant showing that circumstances beyond the mum of the applicant have prevented action from bring taken. In order to renew action on an appllntlon after expiration, the so. plicant shall roubmit plans and pay a new planrthck fee. (d) RNnspecdaa Fee. The fn for each reWpection shall TABLE N0.7•A— BUI LOIN G PERMIT FEES 7D13L VAWk110g ffg 31MwSS00.00 $300 3301.00 to 37.00000 $3.00 for the Ent SWOOD dm U.00 for each •dditbtul 310000 or fever. tie thnad. to and Including 32000. 7200I.0Om331.OM.00 $20.00 for tlw Ant St00ODO dm $4-00 IN each a23�sum tb.–i N dl Ircla�d�nr $3,001.00 b 330.00000 3112.00 tar IIw L -t 323.000.00 Phu ' w eon O.W. too n! II�.OWIaS WAMOO f50.001.00 m 3100,000.00 313700 for the Ant 330.00000 plus $200 fe, inch add,noral SLOOOOD or (,scum, thenof, b •rd fnctudmg SIM.00000 f100.00100 m7700,000003 for 50 inch idd ions! 3I,U,.O0 or fraction thrted. to and indpdinp SSOO.O00.00 SSM.001m and up $M OO for The Ant 5500.00000 plus SI.0O (i each ad,lOmtW SIAW W or (rafLpn thn a Inspections See. 304. (•) Geaenl. All construction or work for which a permit Is required sha0 be subject to inspection by the Building Official, and certain types of construnron shall have continuous Inspection by special Wpee- for, , as specified in Sown 30. A survey of she lot nay bt required by the Building Official to verify eanpilance of thntructure with approved plans. 32 '77 C A i0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 1979 TO: City Council b City Manager FROM& Lloyd Nubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: 1911 ACT ASSESSMENT - Proceedings for Industrial Area Street and Storm Drain Improvements Attached for City Council review and policy guidance is a request from the R.0 Land Company to have the City initiate 1911 Improvement Act proceedings for the construction of street and storm drain improvements for the City's letter. The total Aconstructionsprogramm hasPbeensestimateduatdfromtS12rreAUest S14 million. The 191', Act Assessment proceedings are a legally mandated method of financing improvemints through the issuance of Municipal Bonds secured by real property within the assessment district. Bands are to be retired through tax assess- ments The recent passage of Proposition 13 has resulted in a cloud being created over the legality of 1911 Act proceedings. Attached for Council review is a written opinion thehissue oft thenvalidityiofs1911 Act hassyetitoobebsettlelthrough Court action Because of the legal uncertainties involved, the staff would like to receive direction as to the City Council's desire to begin assessment districts as described by the R C. Land Company request. These proceedings would be Initiated through the retention of Bond Counsel for project formulation and evaluation. Bond Counsel voulo be paid for by the R.0 Land Company at the offset with reim- bursement through eventual assessments when and if the assessment districts are formed. ALTERRATIVES The Council has two alternatives in response to the R C Land Company request 1 Not to begin proceedings at this time and wait until uncertain legal provisions have been resolved. 2. Instruct staff to solicit a proposal for Bond Counsel for services in establishing assessment districts and prepare draft agreements for Council consideration. _11? e I.. i�L • •J l���ATdDFP ;fly MEMORANDUM nig :!IC! {l){7'11WI30f4 LAM. CITY HALL, RANCHO CUCAMONGA s PROM: A ROBERT E. DOUGHERTY, ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY DATE: JULY 5, 1979 RE: 1911 IMPROVEMENT ACT BEND (RC LAND COMPANY) At your request we have researched the question of whether assessments made under Chapter 1S of the improve- ment Act of 1911 (Streets and Highways Coda Section 5340 et. seq.) are "special taws" within the meaning of Article XIII A, Section 4 of the California Constitution. As of this writing, there are no reported . appellate cases dealing with this issue. Legislative Council of California concludes that a special assotsment made solely on the basis of benefits received would not be considered a tax and can be validly impon..A - ithout a vote of the people. A district assessment under the Improvement Act of 1911 is required to be made on the basis of benefits received. Further, after the passage of Proposition 13, the legislature added several sections to the Improvement Act of 1911 providing for assessments of indian owned proporty. The legislature did not make .hanges in the basic method of levying district assessments. It can be argued, by implication, that the legislature thus concluded that the existing statutory provisions for making district assessments are constitutional. 701 Jack Lam - 1911 Improvement Act Bond July 5, 1979 Page Two Although it is our opinion, based upon the informa- tion available to us, that district assessments cider the 1911 Act are not special taxes, ws must point out that this is only iur opinion. The answer will not be known until there is a reported appellate decision on the subjoct. we understand that there is at least one such proceeding pending in the California Supreme Court, and there may be more pending in the various courts of appeal. We also understand that bond cou.sel throughout California are issuing qualified opinions in the subject matter. RED:cec enclosure M r • 40 • 4 A. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL OPINION • One theory of interpretation for special taxes is offered by the Legislative Counsel in his opinion which has been previously cited. The opinion summarizes its con- clusion in the following words: "We think that the Courts will construe Section 4 to apply as follows: (a) Counties, general lav cities, special districts, including school districts., and charter cities governed by general laws on tax matters will not be able to impose anY tax without specific authorization from the Legislature. (b) None of the above entities, includ- ing all charter cities, will be able to impose a tax preempted by the state, either by the Constitution or by statute, unless the Legislature enacts appropriate legislation. As will be noted below, an insurance tax, a real property transfer tax, and an ad valorem property tax could only become an authorized tax if the Constitution would be subsequently • amended to provide therefor. (c) Any goneral tax (or assessment) imposed by a county, city, or special dis- trict to raise revenues for its general fund will require a two -thirds vote. (d) A special assessment made solely on the basis of benefits received will not be considered a tax and can be validly imposed without r vote of the people. Such an assessmer: can be levied on an ad valorem basis, if it can be shown that this basis reflects the estimated benefit to the parcel. (e) Service or regulatory fees limited to the cost of the service or regulatory program will not be considered a tax and can be validly imposed without a vote of the people. However, 'excess' fees or charges will be found to be a tax subject to voter control." [Id. at 20 -21.1 Specifically the Legislative Counsel has determined that any tax which is levied by a local government, regardless ® 14. 131 F 7 June 21, 1979 Mr. Jack Lam Director, Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Lam: The R C Land Cumpany would like to to a 199111 (Improvement _ Act for land that we own In the industrial area of Rancho—Cuca- - oa ndarles are Fourth Street north to Foothill Boulevard and from Haven Avenue east to Rochester. We consider this Improvement Act as a vital step for the offsite developments for Pluess-Staufer and ourselves. We now own or control approxi- mately 300 acres of prime Industrial property. Our proposed Improvement Act will conform to the City's Master Plan and recent traffic study. The following is our proposed scope of work: 1. Extend 16" water main from Cleveland Avenue east to Rochester Avenue (needed by Pluess-Staufer). 2. Build Sixth Street from Rochester Avenue to Cleveland Avenue 120' right -of -way will all utilities (needed by Pluess- Staufer). The second phase will be to complete Sixth Street to Haven Avenue. 3. Complete the widening of Cleveland Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street (88' right -of -way). The second phase will build Cleveland Avenue from Sixth Street north tc the AT&SF Railroad. 4. Milliken Avenue to be built from Fourth Street north to Sixth Street (120' right -of -way). The second phase will build It from Sixth Street to Foothill Boulevard. 0� RC LAND COMPANY'.,' 7. ., aeowesrFCOrra.t.EILva.surec - - !I%- RLa&=CAU- 0P"A62376 • - - ; M41874 -3773 F 7 June 21, 1979 Mr. Jack Lam Director, Community Development City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Lam: The R C Land Cumpany would like to to a 199111 (Improvement _ Act for land that we own In the industrial area of Rancho—Cuca- - oa ndarles are Fourth Street north to Foothill Boulevard and from Haven Avenue east to Rochester. We consider this Improvement Act as a vital step for the offsite developments for Pluess-Staufer and ourselves. We now own or control approxi- mately 300 acres of prime Industrial property. Our proposed Improvement Act will conform to the City's Master Plan and recent traffic study. The following is our proposed scope of work: 1. Extend 16" water main from Cleveland Avenue east to Rochester Avenue (needed by Pluess-Staufer). 2. Build Sixth Street from Rochester Avenue to Cleveland Avenue 120' right -of -way will all utilities (needed by Pluess- Staufer). The second phase will be to complete Sixth Street to Haven Avenue. 3. Complete the widening of Cleveland Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street (88' right -of -way). The second phase will build Cleveland Avenue from Sixth Street north tc the AT&SF Railroad. 4. Milliken Avenue to be built from Fourth Street north to Sixth Street (120' right -of -way). The second phase will build It from Sixth Street to Foothill Boulevard. 0� r, , Mr. Jack Lames June 21, 1979 Page Two S. Widening Rochester Avenue to 88' right -of -way from Fourth Street north to Sixth Street. 6. Build storm drain (36" RCP) from Santa Fe tracks south to Fourth Street midway between Haven and Cleveland Avenues. All the above road Improvements wlll include utilities. The R C Land Company will deposit, upon request, all necessary funds with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to retain the services of the Bond Counsel and Engineer. We have been in conversations with F. MacKenzie Brown to be our Bond Counsel and Art Sullivan and Joe Hyde of Arrowhead Engineering to be our engineers. They have both agreed. The one condition of Mr. Brown's is that he will only work for the City since this is a public project. He will not work for the developer because he feels this would be a conflict of interest. Your earliest attention to this request would be very helpful due to the time constraints of Pluess- Staufer and our proposed developments. I will be happy to discuss this matter with you further if you wish. Sincerely, Ida //2 Blake L. Johnson Consultant BLJ /Jae cc: Mr F. MacKenzie Brown Mr. Art Sullivan Mr Joe Hyde Mr George Leonhard Mr. Joe Dilorlo Mr. A. Martin Stra tman Mr. Lloyd Michael [1F] • t • CITY MANAGERS OFFICE REFERENCE PERMIT STATUS 8786 HELLMAN AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA WE ARE RESPECTFULLY PETITIONING THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO WAIVE THE PLAN CHECK REQUIREMENTS r RN8139(1425 )(1- 026830193 )PD 07/12/79 1428 ICS SOTTBRC RHO 00769 1- 029769S193 07/12/79 • ICS 1PMFON2 2136343330 TORN PARAMOUNT CA 93 07 -12 0214P EST • FOR 7149891851 . HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO Cl.'CAMONOA, ATTN LOUISE OR JIM ROBINSON RPT OLY NON, FOXE AND MAIL 9320 BASELINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 9173 DUPLICATE OF TELEGRAM TELEPHONED • CITY MANAGERS OFFICE REFERENCE PERMIT STATUS 8786 HELLMAN AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA WE ARE RESPECTFULLY PETITIONING THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TO WAIVE THE PLAN CHECK REQUIREMENTS r • • • • • • AND ISSUE OUR PERMIT ON THE BASIS OF THE CORRECTION SHEETS ALREADY • • PERrORMED BY THE SAN BERHADINO COUNTY ENGINEERS DUE TO THE FACT THAT • • THE REQUIRED FEES AND INFORMATION WERE SUBMITTED IN FEBRUARY 1918 TO • • THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO. WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THIS BE ADDYD TO • • THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JULY 18TH. BACK UP • INFORMATION IS BEING POSTED TODAY • DEWAIN R BUTLER 13202 DOWNY AVE PARAMOUNT CA • 13202 DOWNY AVE PARAMOUNT CA 90723 • LOUISE 1218P 284 RDM SENT MLO Km, 0 S" 49 L� OI 1 R. BUTLER i13202 5202 DO OOwnsv Avlwue PAn,wouwf C.ALIrOAN1A 60723 (293) e34.33W July 12, 1979 Honorable Hayor and City Council of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 Re: Permit Status 8786 Hellman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Gentlemen: We are the owners of the real property described above and are now in the process of developing a portion of property with four concrete tilt -up buildings with appurtenant eitework In February of 1978, we submitted engineering plans for the proposed buildings to the County of San Bernardino for plan check with appropriate fees being paid at that time The County checked the plans and returned them to us with corrections and additional information that was required for permit This occurred in May of 1978 Due to the transferrance of Building Department responsibilities from the County to the City of Rancho Cucamonga that was pending, at that time we questioned and were assured by the County that they had started the project and they would see it to conclusion Also during this period, the State Energy Regulations were enacted, and our plans were subsequently revised and resubmitted for plan check again paying additional fees Due to the economic situation at the end of last year, we were delayed in commencement of the project In Harch of this year, we were advised by the County that our plan check was still pending at which time they indicated that there was ro time limit on the life of the plan check. - continued - Honorable Mayor and City Council of Rancho Cucamonga July 12, 1979 Page 2 Earlier this week we returned the plane to the County for final permits and were advised that the plans were to be processed through the City We then found that we were required to pay new plan check fees and have the plane checked for the third time against the same code and energy standards as before On the basis of this requirement, we are placed in an almost untenable time constraint which will cruse undue hardship, not to mention the additional fees required to reprocess and recheck the plans with codes and ordinances which are esentially the same We respectfully petition the Honorable Mayor and C.ry Council to waive the plan check requirements and issue the permit on the basis of the correction sheets already performed by the County Engineers. This would be a matter of signing off each correction against the revised and corrected plans Your favorable consideration of this request would be greatly appreciated DRB:mp Yours very Dewain R Butler RESOLUTION NO. 79-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROCLAIMING THURSDAY, JULY 19, 1979, AS SEBASTIANO `BUSTFR- FILPI DAY. WHEREAS, Sebastian 'Buster" Filpi, a native of Plana degli Albanesi, Sicily emigrated to the United States and to California in 1921; and WHEREAS, during the more than half century Buster Filpi has lived in California he has continually demonstrated an extraordinary ability to achieve success in the business world; and WHEREAS, in 1950.he pioneered mayor industrial development in the community by constructing the first industrial park to Cucamonga; and WHEREAS. since that timw Mr. Filpi has continually demonstrated his commitment to provide industrial development which has not only stimulated the City's economy, but also provided employment opportunities to residents of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the pioneering spirit of Buster Filpi, combined with his faith in the future of Cucamonga has served as an example to other industrial developers, and has resulted in the preservation and development of a substantial portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as an important industrial center for the west end of San Bernardino County; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE) that Thursday. July 19, 1979, be designated as 'Buster Filpi Day' in the City of Rancho .ucamonga in recognition of the many tcntributions of Buster Filpi during the time he has been an active member of the Rancho Cucamonga industrial community ATTEST: PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 AYES: HOES: ABSENT City Clerk MEMORANDUM DATE: July 13, 1979 TO' City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman SUBJECT: Dail -Out Legislation AS 2i n• Rancho Cuc amonga and three os therthe citiesclarification vetoed on bail- out finds f Wednesday evening by Governor Brown. The Governor indicated in his veto message that the prime reason for his action was based upon the fact that some of the cities which were effected incorporated either at the time the Jarvis initiative was passed or afterwards and were, therefcre, only not intitled to funds cities to thenpas y sag - of proposition 13 The author el AB 227. Assemblyman Chappie, is going to attempt a veto override next week The chance of an override is extremely slim however. As fallback protection, Assemblyman Goggin still has 'a 807 which was the original bail -out bill before it was attached to ony other legislation. Terry have gginyeh however. Opportunity sure wet willsbesinlcontactiwiththiseofficeh Terry Gogg In the very near future LHW lk „l D,►x�tiM. p,.,G, /S� AGE N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1401GIJ04 Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School Ilulti -purpo -- " 32r Cam"""p 7105 Carnelian July 5, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All Items submitted for the City Council agenda mnnt b. in writing. The deadline for submitting items Is 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesdcl of each month The City Clerk's office receives all such Items C� //_ _ /1 i • �� 1 CALL TO ORDER. Li /f� f f1�f. N �: • � .p A. PLEDGE TO FLAG. / :✓/+.t.4'..cau4A! /G.w B ROLL CALL Nilels ✓ , Palombe v/. Schlosser V1, Bridge_, Frost_ ✓ / C. APPROVAL OF HiNUTES June 14, 1979, and Jtne 20, 1979 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS 3 COMITTEE REPORTS a Advisory Committee b. hiaorical Comm'ss iun - Resigration of Arthur H Bridge 4 COOSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar Stems are expected to be rou'!ne and nun - controversial Thev will be acted upon by the Council at one time wlthou discussion Any Council rembet, staff member, or Interested partv may request that in item be rm+oved from the Consent Calendar for later discussion n rn, a Approval of Warrants in the amount of $40,699 47 Register No 79 -6 -29 b. Action on the following bands 14 Tract 7709 Release of Bonds to Manfred Hall Performance Bond (road) $32,000 Labor and Itaterial (road) $16,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/25/76) O d 1> 414E+P/I 2,1W941 1 kal,� ?.R,C. /IA60r ifew t,.if'f.vA.4NM Liu” 6MACOIJ eale tvA:R- City Council Agenda -2- July 5, 1979 kt Tract 7330: Release of bonds to Home Construction, Inc Performance Bond (road) S36.000 Labor 6 Material (road) X518,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 7/27/70) Tract 1913 Release of bonds to Novell Realty Performance Bond (road) 530,000 Labor 8 Material (roadl 515,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 1/19/70) Tract 7939 Release of bonds to Fred H Koch Performance Bond (road) $30,000 Labor d Material (road) $15,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/4/70) Tract 7963 Release of bonds to Home Construction, Inc Performance Bond (road) 528,000 Labor b Material (road) $14,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 8/4/69) Tract 7964 Release of bonds to Ham Construction, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $24,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 12/15/69) Tra -t 7967 Release of bonds to Patreyek Homes, Inc Performance Bond (road) $58,000 Labor 6 44terizl (road) $29,000 (The roads �- re accepted by the County of 4/6/76) Tract 14':; Rel•dse of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $26,000 Labor 8 Material (road) $13,000 Labor b Material (water) S 8,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 12/18/72) Tract I Release of bonds to Hatreyek Hones, Tnc Performance Bond (road) S /2,000 Labor b Material (road) $36,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 8/3/70) Tract 3054 Release of bonds to Crewel it Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $36,000 Ldxr d Material (road) $18,00^ (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/19/70) Tract 8085 Release of bonds ti Frontier Land Company Performance Bond (road) $44,000 Labor d Material (road) $22,000 (The roads were accepted by tP4 County of 10/26/71) c' City Council Agenda -3- July 5, 1979 $28,000 Labor 8 Material (road) Tract 8039: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc County on 5/6/74) Performance Bond (road) $40,000 Y Performance Bond (road) Labor E tlaterlal (road) $20,000 Labor ! aterial (road) (The roads were accepted by the County on 9/23/74) Tract 8209 Release of bonds to HorVada Lams Company Labor 8 Material (water) Performance Bond (road) $60,000 (The roads were accepted oy the Labor b Material (road) $30,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 6/14/71) Tract 8266: Release of fronds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $32,000 Labor E Material (road) $16,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 7/24/72) Tract 8295 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc Performance Bond (road) $541000 Labor d Material (road) $27,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/24/72) Tract 8429 Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) 514,000 Labor b Material (road) S 7,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 3/12/73) Tract 8440 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc Performance Bond (road) 546,000 Labor 6 Material (road) 532,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 6/11/73) Tract 8520 Release of bonds to Vanguard Builders, Inc Performance Bond (road) $88,000 Labor A Material (road) $44,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/9/73) Tract 8521 Release of bonds to S b J Industries, Inc Performance Bond {road) 528,000 Labor A Material (road) $14,000 Performance Bond (water) $22,000 Labor d Material (water) 511,000 Performance Bond (sewer) 524,000 Labor 6 Material (sewer) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 1/29/73) Tract 8583 Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California Performance Bond (road) $28,000 Labor 8 Material (road) $14,000 (The roads were accepted by t it County on 5/6/74) Tract 8607 Reiaase of bands to Crowell / Leventhal, Inc Y Performance Bond (road) $72,000 Labor ! aterial (road) $36,000 Perforina.nce Bond (water) $20,000 Labor 8 Material (water) $10,000 (The roads were accepted oy the County on 10/1/73) City Council Agenda -4- July 5, 1979 Tract 8649 Release of bonds to D3rre11 L Rinberry rerformance Bond (road) $22,000 Labor 6 Material (road) 5111000 ( Performance Bond (water) $ 7,900 Labor E Material water; $ 3,950 Performance Bond sewer S 5,300 Labor b Material sewer S 2,650 (The roads were accepted by the County on 1/28/74) Tract 8668: Release of bonds to Vanguard Builders Performance Bond road $50,000 Labor 6 Material road 525,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 7/8/74) Tract 8;30 Release of bonds to S 6 J Industries, Inc Performance Bond !road) $40,000 Laoor d Material (road) $20,000 (The roads wa•e accepted by the County on 10120175) Tract 8796 Release o' bonds to Thompson Associates Performarw.e Bond road S120,000 Labor 6 M terial (road) ; 60,000 (The roads .erp accepted by the County on 5/3/76) Tra.• 8805 Release of binds to Trevor Development Company Performance Bond (road $146,000 Labor 6 /btcrial %road $ 73,000 (The roads mere accepted by the :ounty on 11/14/77) Tract 8806 Release of bonds to Trevor Development Company Performance Band (Road) $180,000 Labor b laterial (road) $ 901000 (The ruads were accepted by the County on 11/14/77) Tract 8815 We",! of bonds to Kent Land Company Labor 6 Materiel (road) $74,000 Labo.• d 1latereel (sewer) 510,000 Labor a i:.terral (water) $19,000 (The reads were accepted by the CoLncil on 9/6/78) Tract 8918 Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc Performance Bond (road) $92,000 Labor 6 Material (road) S46,000 (The roads were accepted by the County 6/23/75) Tract 8884 aelease of bonds to Marnish, Morgan E Causey Performance Bond (sewer -on site) $13,000 Performance Bond sewer -off site) $42,000 Perfromance Bond (water) S42,0D0 ( ,ract 9267 Release of bonds to `Lark III Rn: os, Inc. r Perfcrmance Bond (Serer -on site) 528,000 Performance BonJ (sewer -off site) $64,000 Performance Bond (water) $25,000 i r` City Council Agenda 5- My 5, 1919 Tract 9268 Release of bonds to Clark III Homes. Inc Performance Bond (sewer) S50,000 Performance Bond (water) $35,000 Tract 9269 Release of bonds to hark III Homes, Inc Performance Band (sewer) $49,000 Perfromance Bond (water) $67,000 Tract 9422 -2 Release of bonds to Marborough Homes. Inc. Performance Bond (sewer) Perfronance Bond (water) 5`2,000 Tract 9446 Release of bonds to Kin way Construct�jj Company Performance Bond (sewer) 560,000 Perfornance Bond (water) $82,000 Tract 9448 Release of bonds to Iteeker Development Company Performance Bond (sewer) $29,000 Performance Bond (water) $28,000 Tract 9634 Release of bonds tr, Chavanne Realty Performance Bond (sewer) 528,000 Performance Bond (water) $31,000 Tract 9135 Accept roads and release bonds to Regency Estates Performance Bond (sewer) $30,000 Performance Bond mater) $27,000 Performance Boni (road) 568,000 Trect 9136 Accept roads arA release bonds to Regency Estates Performance Bend (sewer)) $22,000 Performance Bond water) $29,000 Performance Bond (road) $64.000 Tract 9337 Performances Bond (road) bond to Butler Development pn:ent Tract 9422: Accept roads and release bands to Marberough Homes, Inc Performance Bond (sewer) S 29,000 Perfonrance Bond (water, $166,000 Performance Bond (road) Tracc 9280 Release of cash staking deposit to Bob Jenson Builder, Inc Cash Staking Deposit $4,000 Tract 9350 Release of cash sicking deposit to Loma Ranch Homes Cash Staking pepncat $1,409 Tract 9582 -1 Accept roads and release bonds to the Deer Creek Co Performance Bond (water) S111,000 Performance Bond (road) $166,000 City Council Agenda -6- July 5, 1979 Design Services for signal installation at Haven Avenue and Amber Street. .. .. 32 Authorization of Rohle, Perry L ".:-G.lataa L. ,,uv-je uesign / services in the amount of $550 plus printing costs for signals Street vacations for a portion of Arroyo Vista Avenue. Adopt a Resolution of Intent to vacate an extension which dead -ends at the south boundary of the professional office complex being constructed on the southeast corner of Base Line and Carnelian Street RESOLUTION NO. 79 -53. 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS 1NTENTIO1 TO VACATE A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON HAP NO. V -001 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK V )treet vacation for a Portion of Hellman Avenue Adopt a Resolution of Intent to vacate a portion of Hellman Avenue dedication which is now unncessary to the seeds of the public due to the realignment and additional dedications made on the west side. RESOLUTION NO 79 -54 4 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, COU,(TY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING iTS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLIUW AVENUE AS SHOWN ON NAP N0. V -002 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK f General Plan Amendment No. 79 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga. A request for an ar.tendment to the Circulation Element of the General P!dn to remove and reclassify 7th Street in the area of Turner and Hellman and to reclassify 6th Street. For public hearing before the City Council on u,rly 18. 1979 Zone Change No. 79 -05 - Cord nvestment A zone change from R -I to A -P for property located on the southwest corner o asf`I%line and Beryl Street For public hearing before the City Council on July 18, 1979. 41 City Council Agenda ■es, July h. Zone Change Ito. 79 -06 - Uestway Investments. A zone change from It-R to 11 -1 for property located on the south side of 8th Street, between Hellman and Archibald For public hearing before the City Council On July Id, 1919 V i Zone Change NO 79 -01 - Alta Loma Properties A zone change from R -1 to R -3 for property located on the south side of 19th Street between A ethyst and Archibald For public hearing before the City Council of July 18, 1979. I hrendment to Sign Ordinance 11 To set July 18, 1979, for public hearing to amend Sign Ordinance to clarify sign provisions for shopping centers S. PUBLIC HEARINGS'��I• '/C -.� A. Revenue Sharing Funds (SECOND HEARING) �tw{ �µu}j, -, %1/;'� Prior to the actual expenditure Of any revenue sharing funds by the city. it is required that two public hearings be held and four public notices be placed in the local newspaper It is recommended that all revenue sharing funds be used to offset a portion of the City's total cost for providing lab rf• enforceTent services in Rancho Cucarxinga , , „_'-S7r,,,]f�7 °••+� .............. 44 8 Adooclon of Budget for fiscal year 1979 -60. C Ordinance extending moratorium on Adult Businesses ordinance Ito 82 will extend the moratorium on adult businesses to February 1. 1980. C Yrjyy�',.(� ORDINANCE NO 'T°r�• ••• •• 46 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CIEI F. EXTtHDING SS RfIN4 OVRII ZONINGORADULTBUSINESE AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS Crnmunit Develo nt Blocl Grant between the City of Rancho 46 Luca'0.; an t ountro an Bernard no. 4 \5 Council made an amendment to the agreement at its June 20 ` meeting Such amendments were not acceptable by the County. Report by 8,11 Holley City Council Agenda •8- July 5, 1979 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIU;CHO CUCAMOI:GA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR EXPENSES 14CURRED WHILE SERVING AS IIEIEERS OF THE COMMISSION. 7 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 8 NEW PriS1UESS /�.�.� to l� -"4- a. Council t� 6dd!?Ye/pl b. Audience 9. ADJOURIdIENT B. Cooperation A reement between the HousinngA_ut�hority ce 62 San Bernardino pun an t e It ..Rancho Cucamonga Report by Bill Kolley Grant FunlInQ for Storm Drain Construct-on - U.!,. Bureau 84 �� 1 M 1 1 n gram. o ec anw on rant an pa ro Approval of participation to a grant loaf progran from the U 5 Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of store drains is requested This is a ,ioint proposal with the Chino Basin Hater Conservation District, the San Bernardino .0 County Flood Control District, and other West Valley titles Upon approval, an allocation of $2,000 fron story drain fees for the preparation of Notice on Intent Lo apply is necessary ,i D. Landscape Maintenance Districts. •_ 91 r /(QA Preliminary information on the formation of Lane ,cape ILYintenance and Lighting District i;o 1 These districts are for new tracts and tracts now under - construction It is recoamended that council instruct staff to begin proceedings for the formation of Landscape and Lighting 0istrict No. l Report by Lloyd Hubbs 0 E Contract for Traffic Striping Services. 104 �p90- ill Presently traffic striping services is being done under the City's arnaal maii,tcnance contract with the County Staff recontends that a contract be negotiated with Safety Striping Services. Inc. for services for fiscal year 1979 -80 Report by Lloyd Hubbs F A resolution piovidire, for reimbursement for expenses to mm n o e ann nq ss on. RESOLUTION NO 79 -55 ••• 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIU;CHO CUCAMOI:GA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR EXPENSES 14CURRED WHILE SERVING AS IIEIEERS OF THE COMMISSION. 7 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 8 NEW PriS1UESS /�.�.� to l� -"4- a. Council t� 6dd!?Ye/pl b. Audience 9. ADJOURIdIENT A G E 11 D A t •/`j% -6}- /�h,,�.ilt;L S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mb" lvlla,rlMC y��- � (1�-* fit•" Regular Meeting Pay 2, 1979 % �Iwon RMn P 1. CALL TO ORDER. ((rlTt 2 PLEDGE TO FLAG. 3. ROLL CALL: Mikels_, Palombo_. Schlosser , Hest , Frost_,. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: S. ARNWICEMENTS. 6 Ca•'1TTEE REPORTS a. Advisory Committee b. Historical Commission 7 CONSENT CALENDAR: the following consent Calendar Iteas are erpecced to he routine and aam- I, contraverslal. They will be acted upon by the Council at one rl&" wlt7pue dlscussicn Any council member, staff member, or Interested parry my re,- '�` quest that an item be removed from the consent calendar for later di.cuxalon. a Approval of Warrants in the amount of $138.954 53. . ....... . .. . 1_ D. Approval of the Agreeeent for Engineering Services with Associated Engineers for design services for the Baseline Improvement project, minor widening and reconstruction City Council has approved the preparation of this agreement at its April 4, 1979, meeting.... .. . .. ....... .... B c. Appeal of Parcel Map 4783 - Roland Sanchez Aprro�al of public hearing date of May 16. 1979, for the appeal if `+reel Map 4783 conditions - located an the west side of Tun er south of Baseline .. .. .... .... .. ... 14 d. Tract 9254. Release of Bonds to Walton Canstruction Corporation. Libor 6 Material (sewer - on site) S16.000 Labor b Material Boad (sewer - off site)S 5.000 Labor d Material Bond (water) 5181000 >:rty Council Agenda -2- May 2, 1979 e lrrtt 942D: Release of bonds to Margaret C faalbach, et al.. ..... 21 and acceptance of substitution bonds `rom Fox Hollow Limited Partnership Release: Perforwnce Bond Sroad) $64,000 Performance Bond %water) $37,000 Labor b Material Bond (road) f32,ODO Labor E Material Bund (water) 318,500 Accept: Performance Bond (road) $64,000 Labor E Material Bond (road) $32,000 f Tracts 9586 Release of bond to Lewis Homes of California.......... 40 and 9587 Performance Bond (Landscaping d Block Wall) $74,804.88 Tract 9616 Accept 9• ept roads and release bond to M.J. Brock.. .. . 42 S Soma Performance Bond (road) $122,000 n Tract 9617 Accept roads and release bonds to M.J Brock.......... 44 E sons Performance Bond (sewer) $28,000 Performance Bond (water) $26,000 Performance Bond (road) $84,000 • Appeal of Director Review Apo. 79 -12 — Sierra Savings -... .... . 46 The appeal of a public service and identification sign to De located at 8730 19th Street. Set hearing for May 16, 1979 maeting ± 3 Approve Alcoholic Beverage License for (On -Sale beer and ............. 47 �L wine eating place) for Roaring 20's Pizza Parlo^ et 9797 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 City Council Agenda -3- May 2, 1979 8 PUBLIC HEARINGS: ..• f: .•,dinar_^ Orlrn win Staff Access to the Sta•.e Surmaa r m na w sto ormat on ORDINANCE NO. 66 (Second Reading) 48 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE INELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN PERSONS FOR EMPLOYMENT BY THE CITY AND AUTHOR17ING CERTAIN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES ACCESS TO THE 'STATE SUMRARf CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION' �(� B An Ordinance Re Latin the Use and Possession of Wea on W06 a 'ay n certa n Secc ons o t e an ernar no aunty Code. 49 ORDINANCE NO. 60 Second Reading) AN ORDINANCE Ot THE CiTY LOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. REGULATING THE USE AND POSSESSION OF WEAPONS AND REPEALING SECTIONS 22 011 THROUGH 22 020 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CODE NfluJ tv C An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 59 Relating to Electrical eau at ons ORDINANCE 59-A (Second Reading) •• 51 _ WoV 0 J�`% 1v AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOhGA. CALIFORNIA. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 59 RELATING TO ELECTRICAL REGULATIONS Ordinance NO. 77 (Second Reading) The City initiated zone change from C -2 (General Commercial) to A -P (Administrative Professional) for Parcels located north side of Foothill Boulevar , west of San Diego Avenue This zone change was prompted by the Planning Commission's approval of a professional office code complex at this site and adoption of a Resoluti^ of Intention on February 28, 1979 The General Pidn design tion for the site is mixed use Professional offices aro allowed in the C -2 zone and cm-patible with land uses allowed in the mixed use designation The C -2 zone, however, allows more intense commercial uses which are incompatible with mixed use designation RECWENDATION: A change in zone to the A -P zone district to eliminate the possibility of incompatible uses and bring the zoning into literal conformance with the General Plan 52 • City Council Agenda -4- May 2, 1979 ORDINANCE NO. 77 (Second Reading) AN ORDIRANCE OF TnE Eiff Cinmi,iL OF int CiTt OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 207 - 101 -32 AND 33 FROM C -2 TO A -P LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD HEST OF SAN DIEGO AVENUE Y E An Ord lnance Re ulatin the Stara a Use and Sale of Safe hr ��01_ ya and one reworks t n t e C ty 0? Rant no CUM= .9a. P� Last year, the Foothill Fire District utilized guidelines of �uo �ati their governing board for control and, fortunately, attained Y / cooperation of the organizations engaged in sales. The proposed ordinance will provide necessary enforcement and penalty capabilities which were lacking last year The City of Rancho Cucamonga is concerned with maintaining construction, zoning, and electrical standards, which have also been incorporated into the ordinance RECOMMENDATION: It is the recomnen,iation of the Building and Safety Division and the Foothill Fire Protection District that the proposed fireworks ordinance be approved by the City Council ORDINANCE NO. 78 (First Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATING THE STORAGE, USK AND SALE OF SAFE AND SAYE FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA W f's 10 F Zo�ninOrd inan�ce When ,went No. 79 -03 - Vanir Research - A than a of zone from A- to -P for :he ro ert ocated on the northwest Corner o t treet an t a v_nue. ORDINANCE NO 79 (First Reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 202 - 101 -16 FROM A -1 TO A -P LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST COPNER OF 19TH STREET AND AHCHIBLAD AVENUE ,Sa 62 City Council Agenda ■1m May 2, 1979 G. IrAvenue. .t ORDINANCE NO. 80 (First Reading) 83 t�S d-.O1%' AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING PARCEL FN LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF STREET AMETHYST D H DALD ' 9 CITY MANAGER'u STAFF REPORTS [�����I S / 7r $, Street name Changes. / Some street names within the City need to be changed because the existing names aro conflicting and potentially confusing as in cases w' espoi.ding to emergency calls and can cause considerable .tax delays. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -38, _ 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE CHANGING OF CERTAIN STREET NAMES Approval of Parcel Mao 4735. / A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California approving Parcel Map 4735 (Banyan and Haven) RESOLUTION NO. 79 -39 , . 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMER 4135 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 4735) 10 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 11 NEW BUSINESS a Council B Audience 12 ADJOURNMENT •�y MEMORANDUM TC: Lauren Wasserman FROM: Harry Empey SUBJECT: Budget Attached is a suanary of the budget as presented to Council during their workshop sessions Some figures have changed but is due only to salary a?Justments and budget changes as directed by Council. HJE cak Y L d u N Y W Ly N 9 Y O L N Y N LL N Y Y LL OI UC ~Y Y ACC NU � O G C�� >LU r� O G�UG�U i1G tL A gdgNNU F' O \ d r O P L Y d A L S L O L Y q yy�q�GCd P M l� fi NO dM•dA Y C L L G V G YM CYyY yC1q"CP� Gp d �/�OLON >AGY I�L t)U 4.dY d0. p0p G¢ 3 N JLLfOdNNGO�U q �'100)b P1�N1'1M INTO Q 1� nOOl000TIflN0 bOOTOOtOQ10p Q 10 m I7 M OTTIO tD 10TPPbb1p �{VV ICI NIOQNnN10NPY1 Q f'fOO.V YIb ���S I�Q � Q H_f O 1"' fOQ� NOI'IQbNN1� � r�I�Q)N I(f 61PQ �pN 0171101/11'1 mNQPR)I'f IDOQO O ^Q1 r �10NNNI�N� O �NNQ17 f7�� N I'f I'1 Y C Q 1�00(DOO N O P O) r d 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I1p 10 IOOOPOO 1 Q OO N N Q > 6 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11� b n O O N b b p 0 0 0 N OOn10 1 T CCCCCCJJIJJI O 1/1 Iq L ^ ^ NN<POJ 1p n O A Y O� 1 O Q 1 n 1 O� O Ifl Q 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 In 1 1 1�1 6M 010 OHO 6fTUf0 1 N Yl 1 Go 1^ O b Q N 1 N � 0.000000000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O 17 m b N N d dam- OC10b NI�vTn1'fv b OOP T O Yr^ OVI7 IO I�bCO QI�I�tl� 1 NN��bOQNOI�b�TO Q b 1 1 1 1006: 0000 01(��000 1 O UN bN1006IT��m��n 1 N 1 1 O ^W 6I WgcJ pp C m '�P y1� N d OOT m10b Yf0 Q N 1 11111 IOI In Q P Or L GOPI I IN{y IO WMI OTItOyOOON(61'1 bI�O 17 N 0000001';O�O Q q �Pf01 1 1�C IV�OI IG 1 1 1 1 1 101 Q Q ^J N W O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O IlI Q10 1 1 1 OJO 1 P 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 P 1 P O] ^PQ Y L d u N Y W Ly N 9 Y O L N Y N LL N Y Y LL OI UC ~Y Y ACC NU � O G C�� >LU r� O G�UG�U i1G tL A gdgNNU F' O \ d r O P L Y d A L S L O L Y q yy�q�GCd P M l� fi NO dM•dA Y C L L G V G YM CYyY yC1q"CP� Gp d �/�OLON >AGY I�L t)U 4.dY d0. p0p G¢ 3 N JLLfOdNNGO�U C 1978.79 REVENUE SU'gwY 1979 ++1 CATEGORY BUDGET Taxes 1979 -80 Property Tax 302564 Sales b Use Tax 250000 Cigarette Tax 95000 Property Transfer Tax 75000 Franchises 235000 Sub -tatal 957564 Licenses d Permits: Business licenses 105000 Dog Licenses 1000 Building Permits 320000 Other Lirenses 6 Permits 250 Sub -total CFines, 426250 Forfeitures, a Penalties: Court Fines 2500 Revenue from Other Agencies: 46067 Alcoholic Beverage -0- Motor Vehicle in Lieu 535761 Off- HiShway License Fees -0- Highway Carriers Business -0- License Tax Sub -total 584328 Charges for Services: Engineering Fees 40070 .Tanning Fees 61000 Sub -total 101000 1978 -79 ESTIMATED REVISED 1979 -80 235051 239752 795000 903041 105000 105830 90000 70000 27303 .280000 1498494 1619623 170000 1500(7 750 1000 24698! 397000 1401 - 1000 422140 549000 1100 1000 -0- -0- 17012 18240 536833 765409 649 693 3878 6684 559472 792026 16217 100000 61000 7, 5000 77217 175000 Y } REVENUE SuMNARY 1979 -80 CATEGORY Miscellaneous: 0 00 !0000 Entera, E.-ings 55000 100 80000 400 Salo of Printed Material 11300 5155 Other Revenurs 66400 85555 50400 S,o -total 2135542 2642878 3186049 TOTALS Special Revenue - Transfers 1n: _0 185789 Traffic Sharing 91680 26000 0000 3 6000 Traffic Safety Fund Gas Tax 2107.5 6000 6000 18000 150000 S.8 154 Distribution _p_ s 97680 50000 371189 sub- total TOTAL GENERAL PUND 2233222 2776433 3557238 598982 657663 656936 Prior Year Carryover 4214174 Total operating Revenue 274052) 3410096 Special Funds Revenue 99300 493298 Park Development 99300 817306 817306 1086367 Local Transportation b Gas Tax 122135 102000 47165 CETA 'p " p 0- 222000 Block Grant -0- - _p_ 240000 Systems Development -p_ _p. 336600 Beautification "O" -p_ 103145 Storm Drains "0 _ _p. 185159 Revenue Sharing 1038741 1018606 3076616 Total Special Funds TOTAL ES71iL1TED REVENUE 3179263 4428702 1315432 L� i i E City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 20, 1979 Mayor and City Council City of Rancho Cue amoage 9720 -C Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Dear Mayor and Council mombrrs: This to to Inform you that I hereby resign from the Eistorical Coamisslon. $Ia rely, Arthur H. Bridge AIIB:baa F051' OFFICE DOS 797. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 989.1851 a P N P N a W F Q O PQ N W F O zo W� xLL z W O } r V G 2 W r W h O 1 J LL LL J X J W U O Q < 0 0 0 6 J •- V O m N • '• � .� O P1 N N 0 a P n� .r (� �• < u u i u u 0 �u o -< a o o• a a n c u. LL 0 } u PQ W l9 t 6 11 d OOmoo1v ¢CO.IOOh H NOOPNNm W NrOOCrN 2 NrNP1 1.. M 7 V u C N r r � p C N O V 1•• Q W r Jy 2W V ¢¢ 2 JW O DLL V 9W W ¢ ¢ f i Q ¢ ¢ a s ¢W ¢F a¢ 10 w u Z N Y } ` OW OJJN VV NCC< Q � W NZ6U rY u u¢aaw —NZ• u u W. Z Ur¢UV2 Q O JJWi JYo(]f V mQZ OZNr. V WVC}< JJ. u O FOLLJQ 2 ¢LLLL�Zr U ODUQ = xi u N C U K J V2¢1 2 > QZ—ZSr2 COI Y W2Q /QCC LLI LL NOPN•'.rPO{ O 2 InNVMrPmr. W f•IPr NPtI^.+Of Y > ¢mrNmmO >: r V ¢ Ie14N ONOmr1 r ¢ ...rrrrVU J• O Q NNNNIb� Ql • 3 COGCO. Nl of 000 0 0 00 ao, 01 ei 0�0 0 ' lit u p au ¢ NO N yN Z }Q 1.f $IJW ec N QaLLQ . rrLL3 � JO r} N r to • 4 �- e e� �: t a E u x w � 0 7 4 i WJ O J w ow m o Q• u v = r} N r to • 4 �- e e� �: t a E • r u V J a t W V T •,t 00 N > N U V 6' N t'J N r < K V Z6 WK W DO J ► a r II i O W V t 6 Naoo r POMO Y w Nano P W PY P z a t z 0 0 u P N w r \ p P N a 2 r w < W r JU J 42 r =w V 6K +„ �W O OLL U 'aW W (( 6 r r a_ PPPPP CW wrwww 44 PPPPP ZO NNNNry aaaoa Y N J 4 O H J r Q a �_cl ilJe�L is Yv S1 �t W W : o u < W r w W < wx W2 N u r< Z J cc w W 1 O NJ < O p4 u zanuw z J O �10— u o-� r z «up O C= J S W W U W Coo Z > NJtLY� 4 uw•WJLL C xsxr r LL OOWO p = OOPPr W d11�P PO T > PPOP> r r u C POrN^I a < V S pt; ocava Oolo�Oo 1 � - Q � a �_cl ilJe�L is Yv S1 �t Y W - 00 00 O 0 rr • • 00 �I O O Nnt .pp M NN .IMO VIII FA 00 00 hn �.� II ° ° .. �� .. .... .. Nh .. C 00 O O rr 00 PP In�O Iv.V M II M C N N NN .•.-. .•Q NN rr PP OO y O-O- . N1 M rr n h P 7 n u P t � N Z N 2 I D N N I r i n O W N C ry H f I O O G M C= O ON y O O N O ON O O O O O p N ON O J cc W J y p < J J J m O .<- O 111 O 6 h H /- 0- < < + o O n W N N w Q FW. S• Z C Y 6 6 N N W ti ° 4 x G _ 1 a s ° o �, a .N. 1°I•. z r c�� i � _ AV s a a > V ° O O ~ W zzz ° V J L Y O < 60 ais s W V m LL H V SSZ •' o J W LL O G > 6 P P P P P P W P \ \ < N r N N ry PDP \ •• 0 \ \ �� N N N N A 0 0 o a.o.o o c W u n o ,• o P h o N K f N F Y n O Nell N I P h r Y C N W N UP Z O Z O < < 4 2 4 Z V Z a LL a W 6 f 2 O O K ft Z f t ( Z n w N Y N S N W ONI r W N J I II u a o <1 0 Cl u I N N ° .°.l m .Pr °1 °„ O b0{. O b m O V O �>" „y 1 1 fit 1 N I N 1 N 1 N n f U p 1 V. ° e- r o .- u h W W O W O C G C y. � Al W W W W W N N N N N y • pOP r N A P NYrF 00 NN N00: NN as 0 P N N N YF \NN WYD 00 Nn .f? =• O J r+ a N O J a 0 9 n N O J a 0 P M1 \ N 0 O LL fL v W Q v P a M1 4 \ i P a N a r o z N a O W OC N r K O I O 3 J •a. I W ° I i z r N . o I D W O r N u W C z G K r 4 2 3 W W N V O a a K F � 2 6 a IS o 6 O +N000a00N01.1NV oNPOOOh0000rvoa VPVVVY�aJPOyory hrF rn. YY NNaNN oa .nnnlnn +r r+.+rN PP VY 00 MN OO M YV PP VO NN a0 pOP r N A P 0 0 0 0 0 P N N N N N O O O O O J J J J J M1 M1 \ F \ \ \\ u \ O O O D \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ P P P Y W PPPPPPPCPPOpO u N N N r r N NMV n \ 2 Z N I r y p N < Q } NNNN WY W JSOC iY S J •/IWtlJ r <Q Or v u NGS-) aaao a 0tw 2aZ < Z JWJS a aaa o a 422 WVJOC WC 0000 O 0 X00 JrWW020 <QK< < F \ =z¢ar ae.aa N W J2222 \C NJL U J W W 2.�rWWWW2 <YPOK OD O < V V 6i3 »D >VUN NV ZiNi V i 0 4 aaQ6K NQQr WWMW W < < V2LSSSS<SarVN ZZOS J O O pOP P P PPPPPPPPPPPPP PPPP P P O FFF F F I FFM1M1FFFM1FM1FFF FFhF M1 M1 \ F \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ P P P W PPPPPPPCPPOpO PPPP N N N NMV N N I r NIVNNNMNNMIVNNN NNNN aaao a a a aaa o a o aoaaaaoaoaoaa �00 F W POOPrNaO NNN P V a0�.^NI`Prafa + M1 OPO 1.100 + „ 000 O \ I O 0+ +00000000 OOOOYP O O VYV 2 a } OOOOOOn1ON000C /'nnn V aa0 ... P OOONnnPr0a000 000m ..nrr 4. ... I .�.. r rr +rrr +lVrvnnrr 0000 } 4 N S O V Y W 6 4 fL Q N 2 I \ t O < Z W K < V 2 r < V D r F > V 1 V � O U •L < w • 1 z n u ° O o W a V ; m m o u N W o z n C VNr 1LLL N N P Q M< 0. J Fn^1n J n W Y U N pK nrN Q 11 N C I 7 U IWVYNNN.YIyl.NN+'O J NNNN + N J O W ."1 1 L I O 1 0 7 Iltllllllllll r 1111 << O I V O O t IV M1VO U P u M1 .� O V OVOOOOOOOOtJVO rNUV r+Nn V I r I N I N y l . -111.N I+ 1 0 O V I NNNNNyfN11♦NNNNN 1 1 Iil 1 1 4 I1�1_. I_I1111111 X111 1 � � p < � +oavor..N O V r M1 .' M1 ,r Clrr V •}. bOOOVOO000O0Y r oOVO W W W L N N N N Aj, V.'i I I LL iI 3 ea wM1 O•Ym JJ NN cc Oo momo P Iwam JOOJ wW :Pa 00 00 a »N N I hNw1 aoary cc .•..•. OrP P1w1 VJ NN Pftnm P • • • • • • = »O V'PN yN V.r.Ji m NP1N NnLJ JV hhN y hN aoiNNO i wNN .Ir .N+NOV NN I » r S P � F O \ L P < I N 0 U O O O O < W¢ F M1 w N O ry N N N O O O O O O O O Q< I V 3 O G O J J J J I < < < Q Q •� J J O O O I W F F w v W 4 I F N WX WV I n au ti ¢ ¢W 4 O e ¢ LLZ mP m •o" < ¢ XN ¢ »N M1 w F I < \ WNa P US ti LL ` I 6 <m O 2¢ P• ¢ OWJ J J Q W J a »e < I O OS W¢3 2' t Z V < Q aPe m p O ^Y r I VV >wr VI r i tJ PAP » SKK m mmm X s Jo N O LL PPP LL I "IJ 63 66 SwF f 4 I P PP PPP P I w FM1 F F w wFF F PP PPP ti \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ I wF wFM1 P N pP p p P PPP \\ \ \\ \ NN N N N NN" N W P6 p I H NN " NNN ry a as a a a aaa o I o ea aaa a C I I m 4m W VIJN • m O O JO •P(Xn A mm y ? mR1 ¢Nm O �tll � �� JGU W y I M1PZ V O i > YI W W I Q N r O O I W W W A v I < u F = O WI > r NNy mm OCO W» Q 11 11 ¢ 1 ¢ 1 W 111 1 r I ¢ S 1 '1 1j 6 1 m 111 S 1 1 ^'• Ha » I N N j� ZI LL O S I 00 P 1 1 1 VNa N O V I NN 1 J40 1 .• y r o ti�l I V o •O- Uo n lO.. lo. Voo O I >< O r» O rrs = r wo r VOO r V O V W W W W W W V o C N > N N N N N N N N N W u I • a •N dd '� dN•1 YY 00 00 =Do I P TdCi YOOI / hs FPd 04V •`N TT 00 YY 00 rvN dFrry V`•'•TC N P I fYNT dO�ON t yV dPN yN �rY NN O•VNO O I •WIN NNI•f I•TCIV NNNd 1 r NNYI r hN d Y r ry a• Ip0 I NN I •+ IFt P 1.1 I P < I N I\ L O O G d d d ,PC N od O O O O I W K O O D G N N N N f K N N tNY O O O p < < e a < < 4 G O H F F 1•• W I h F 1'1•I 0 0 0 0 0 0 h h F H r F ? H H I f �(� •.1 p I d0 P ��j•�1 r r O rr i I .. b i.l N WY I Wu u zu 1. ` F W I C \u CC W �C� T N m ( � p•J. O 1[uG�j( T Qn Od U. JJ OMY •lfl U ` \ U I N O J4 d FF 1• � \ ? t1 JN < rTP J ! W6G < < W J dNO Q OZ i:�•� r u d ?d a m CCf[ YI 2 uY = 5 F I YY Sam G l•� O nN t/: K IW r y J WOO O 4a �3s ;'� 9 JO N C LL PPP LL I C.Q. ;y.•.. t<., •• 31 I I P h PP nF C. P F P F PPP P PP QPO` P hFh F I FF hF F ' P PP P P P 1 N NN N N N PPP NNN P W PP PPll P N F I NN NNN d d d dOd d I O dd ddd d i I •' O to W TYN D PP I U nOF • �.� oxv m O I O YO T 00 P i mT LNO O TT r r JLLQ W I M^ FPS u O • I p I W r u cc 1 6 W W W I V W K Y1 L W x x 4 W W x b• v u C W x W O < = u p W 0 r O L J N n Y y W « I u N < Z W > 2 a O IIZ V O I J IM z x J IC •. PII 0 0 W prN 2 w x < W N ✓ .f N C .N• w` W F OOO W r is i 1 [Y 1 p' 1 W _ 1 1 1 a 6 2 S x M0 TT S T7 F 6 W UV W LL U I, V 4 1 D< so 0 t' 1 1 1 r 1 1 v. 1 N O QUO x O I LL O S QW POO P 1 N 1 YNd I N O u t NM 1 rNO 1 r O C Ny .1..1 1 1 1 � 1 Ir u 1 1 7 1 1 1 V ^' OV r O r ti I< O F Vo0 O PO tY00 w O O W :.I W W u p p W W W W W N N N N N N N y yNj � M ■ 1 1 NN 1 1 00 4w CO 00 Q O 00 ODD 00 V M 00 FF n h NN NN 00 00 F� 00 J: Jl • Y C H O O O W ? O O NNO jw oo as co as rY: O P u o o mC1 PP NYC AT O O O l� TT A T 00 N o :N TA AA TT y= VJ Q Q NN N N 6 NN V J < J < 1 1 N C H O O O W O O O O O O O O u o o a O O O O p N o 0 F Q 6 Q Q Q Q 6 V J < J < J Q J J U •- 6 F � n r 6 � F •� O F O F O o o < H Q p 6 •D- m J N T N s a W N N • I V 0 F W N K .F. s 2 W W C r N W V w U ► F N x n V V x 6 x m P P P P P p P n n P \ \ \ F N T A N � N Q N D 7 O N • ` N W N 2 . � J _ 6 6 ~ O = J U N F• J V Y J W V F J Q = L 3 r F EC W J 1 1 1 O w D 1 1 N 1 V F o O r C U U F O F F •� F r O O J J C O O O O C N N N N N N N N N N > � 1 en• r] u.r r r r r r N • '+rr r •N. •L6• EWE 1 �. �w.J W u a 6 1 I rw OOd IwdmM1 00 00 co 00 NN 00 NN QO PP POP C. QQ CO co NN dd 00 PP .w • GU PNf InOP•1 00 FM1 ff dd M1F 00 NN rr hN hl'� yP O PP N� »r0 Od NN NN w•w I N rr 1.r.q •1'f NN I I z � IP - F u i I a N d r m m m m m m W 6 U O O O O O O P O P O P O P O I �• 6 Q a N O IN N N N N N N O :L O O O O O O O O O O IJ OC Q J J J J J J J J J J W �' a r 4 r Q F Q �• Q r Q r Q r 4 Q Q m O O O O O O O 'J r wJ r O r O s cow NNN �y O N r�w ¢ 6 W F• N N a W Z U F i 2 � ¢ J N W a NS 6 r ¢ V r N 7 K \ •D .W.. K V M1 Z m O a a i r wa ¢ J pd O O W I 4 > Q IK-• S WS Wrw V O W p ¢C W\ W p 2 W O _ J U OYO O W y o u J > 6U O >U W LL V U r a Jr Q¢m y y, 2 N u N 6 Q ¢ OJ 07 O W W r Up ¢NN iQl 10.1 O P Z N p P PP PPP P P P P P P P F nF FFF F M1 F M1 F M1 F M1 P PP PPP P P P P P P P P r N NN "NM ry N N N N N N N 4 \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ o d da ada W u j voJ r o F •f N y r w N • w0 ff r P N W V V ►. N f Q Y W W ¢ u u u r N = w ul N O Z 4 r a U ¢ N ¢ r y O W J � � K � t ¢ O V O W Q r J V • O H Q W Y K O p 1 O r r 6 Z Y U H = N N Q � O W O 6 r r N Q JN ¢ TNK J O Q fn Q F Z ^•AN N 2 f O N O f J m U 1 W 1 Q 1 6 1 C 1 1 LL O i v i VV i 000 Z O a U P 2 0 6 V p V 6 0 6 N Q t 4 O U 1 N 1 NN 1 NNN I N 1 M 1 •+ 1 N 1 N I •+ I N 6 � u r i.I+ :•rl w I •+ 1 t 0 fLt N > W W W W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N N N N as m �� ..rw_1 r� •w<.a.� �r u W N O 0o co oa da ?0 00 0o r dm mm_ oo ad MI•. r� FF ryV N O 2 N O m G 0 O N P a J N d r P P P P O O O O N M1 N N O O O O J J J J O P 2 o O G o H F F V r O J P P a G 2 V 2 2 `a 7 u O N P P a V J Z P P d I W 1 N 1 m P F N u N 1 J O P 2 o. CI• O F N N O H O •ntt PO O O a d AdP NOPP dC rr ++ o J J m m WMI: Inr�op Q Q OS a Q Q \ C .. ¢V NYr PP N N Mt r/t r.ON PC hry do 0 o r F mma nm z;, P PP 1 T N h InJ f•.NJ 2 ' P 7 r u \ a P Q N d z Q W 6 r C Q Q U 3 G i 2 O G ti u C r Q C C Q u ]L W N O O J 6 1 N d N F W Q J P r W P f N 4 \ O d 0 1 N 1 m P F N 1.1 N 1 J O P 2 O CI• O F N N O H O F N O O O r O r O O d F O J J �• r J Q Q OS a Q Q \ C N ¢V In u O O W W O F F rte C J C H Z p W WF P P P 0 N \ N d J O P 2 O CI• O F r\ P N D W d F J P O D OS \ C N ¢V In u Q•- O V 6 W rte J J ILK Z p W WF P P P PP F F F rF P m PP a a a as 0 O W OOOO - U O NO NOOT.- 0 vm oo -NOf. O PPt Odm vP y N aF NO d O J.. NN O .Z.. QQ TnT 1'IT m u u J y r O V N 6 J J i 0♦ W u a n o u m u o G O W Q V Q Q u m y a o a n z C I Q W J O♦ Y♦ W ` G I U N Q C J W � S m� d 7 d N 4� M F {� N 6 J Z 1•tr ._- r.nm.r -.� n C 1 .. r V N I K Z O d O N 2 4 T rN O NFNNM1.. 1 Q 1 2 1 r 1 7 0 I O 1 Q I W I ti 1 1 O 1 1 1 1 1 1 O G N 6 0 G O LL 0 6 P pC O N p• N V N PF N rP0000 N 1 . N 1 N O U 1 w 1 N 1 •+ { N t r0 I r••.J M.N�I' r w O O •+ O ' Y Q p r O .1. O O O .+T O .li.. �../. OOOVOO N N N N N N N N N N 6 r r r I 6 r r 1 r r. .•. � r yJ a • W u f •noaarr ONam O Q• N1T 0000 mm FOh U O YY ONI•IYaY ONam p 1J PP 0000 PP as a m O O NN •••• • • •• n<_Na Y• N m0 • VY Nn hOF V V V NhO.aiP� M r NN r Y"Ma NN NN nn.a m4 y F � r r NN h S P � n u z P Q 1 \ 1 N O N In V N a a I Z h O O ti W y O O r r •Oi IA N r F N N O O O �+ O O O O I << O O r O O S O J J •On W ~ ~ ~ n O O O O O O m O W O F F ¢ r• r n 1. x r ~ 6 O 4 L m • N O O s K d W I N u W ON rn 1 Orr arr < rPP ¢ f•)rr ¢ N > Inoo c ¢ u s f zx i v1- w .°t W vyi 1-r O N IOU d O Y Or NJ2 T a4A Q U d S LL ALN m WO 1 K maw H ¢ YI O nLa2N iNK F W n1. � N C nQ5 x H n22 u n 6 ON 6 0>OSr 0DOX PmQ T Q 200 > 1 d 3 WU 1�-• UV r (L IJIOJO nrr POJ . 1 NaF n J N l¢J II m r O YQ YI.1 .nrn Q Q O>y < W 44 I'Ih OFN PPP O O xNN = K 00 N W PPPPP PPP P P PPP P P PP P Q �hnhh FFF F F FFn F n hF F h \\\ \\ \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ JtrtrPP PCP N P PCP P P W trP 1'1 P VNNNN NNN N N NNN N N n NN N aaaaa aao a a aoa a a o as a a 70000 W NN Dry OYO N U 00 vm~. Y. let ~NNr 0Y" OYN 1.1 l00 N O YY O ..=mm rM~n NrP a y00 m > F .YfANn NOP N U NYY O S 1M119 a tt•JN NOr N y Innm m N V O N O U K n N N J ♦ FLL• ' < W • Q 6 f M r U 0 0 U 6 K I W V y6 W ¢ x 4 W • d 1. f • J J Z F V x V J V x N N ¢ U U 6 r z LL .- w 4• ' o d ti mrr V a K m U OOm 4 Y O Q +•' Q 00 T N n NNNN J NNN N < N W f N N I¢ 2 +I N N N O a 1 I1;$ O 1 1 1 O I d r 6 III III 1 1 J 1 W 1 JOUVO N OVO N O N M N rNV ..1 O v. r LL O !• UO O O >R O 11NNNN 1 YNN 1 N 1 ...1 1 �•+.N 1 N 1 r O U 1 NN I N I N 1 1 1 1 1 V of f JOVVO Qua 10' O O O VOO V O h r 00 f O t� W IL• W W II W W W ',�7!jv L -7 •., w.I-� _;- ].V��_.._�- ,_.�'_... --., ,. � 7 11 7 �i 7 17 '1','_`.'� "�da:. ` w O 1 N I 1 i P • • • ♦ • ♦ � r PP OD tir 00 00 m nl N I. O I NN .O �p f�1ln 00 �O � N P s PP Y�I Y Y P N V a .. .o O O 1�1 Y v J t 1 1 I I P r O ~ j N T O N r H N O .+ N O .r N O N O. h G W i I' 1 J J J J 0 N W .L N Q f Q F Q t Q �. Q� '> P O M O � O t O I W C N J r� 6 a O f P P S J 4 O S t N N N Z LL 1.1 J �0 Q H O V H I H N O C u. w J r C V d N P r P �O r'1 Y a i 1 i I 1 N i N I i O ,� 1 O 1 I I I h O N 1 P r Y s 6 N V O O O J � C p� LL y� Y W p < a n = P P P ti F A P P S N N N �0 V V O N I w .� V a Y W Z N a Oi J LL Q N � 6' 6 6 i 6 N O U O T. O K 2 N P O O O m J P Q .p Y N 1 W 1 � I .i P Y P t 0 1 ; 1 1 ; ; O r O .� O � O W O W p J � J N N N 1 I I I h • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 Tt,: City Council Fvcm: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SutvEm RFLEASE OF BONDS IN FiLE TRANSFERRED TO THE CITY As a ratch -up item of work, the Engineering Division Fes started a full review of the status of all bonds now held by the Cit.,. It has been found that many streets have been accepted for maintenance. tut bonds not released an,i that we are somewhat behind on the release of Labor anJ Material bonds. Tha attached list takes action on many of the bonds in these situations. Libor and Material bands are to secure a lien on the band holder to pay claims from subcontractors and materials suppliers. If claims are not p•esentee against the bond within six months of the release of the Per - fonunce bond, the Labor and Material bonds are automatically ral ^.ased Q0The next few agendas will catch up on these items If the Council has any qufstions, please feel free to contact me anytime A ! i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM • DATEe July 5, 1979 TOr City Council FRO.tls Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECTr CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 8884 - Release of bonds Located on the east and south sides of Red Hill Country Club Drive OWNER: Harnish, Horgan 6 Causey 500 East "E" Street Ontario, California Performance Bond 6Sewer -on site) $13.00 Performance Bond ((Sewer -off site) $42.000 Performance Bond Mater) VOTE: Ina sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25. 1979 F TRACT 9 ?67 - Release Of bonds Located on the ncrthwest corner of Banyan Street and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Mark III Hanes, Inc 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 c Perfomarce Bond (Sewer -on site) 528.000 7erformrnce Bond (Sewer -off site) $25,00 Performarce Bond (Water) NOTE The sanitary etctsJuo y te Cucamo a ounty WaterDisricton ne25 ,1979 t TRACT 9268 - Release o•' bonds Located south of Wilson Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Aver., OWNER mark I; Homes, Inc S 2950 ?edhill Avenue costa nesa. California 92626 Performance Bond (Sewer) SSO.G90 Performance Bond ;Water) $35.061 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were tpproved by the Grcamdnga County Water District on Jun- 25, 1979. TRACT 9269 - Release of bonds Located on the south side of Nilson Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue OWNER: Hark III Homes 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 Performance Bond (Sewer) S49,000 Performance Bond (Water) $67,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Mater District on June 25, 1979 TRACT 9422 -2 - Release of bonds Located on the east side of Turner Avenue south of Church Street OWNER: Narbomugh Moses, Inc 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90067 Performance Bond (Sewer) $36,000 Performance Bond (Water) 552,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water, system were acproved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979 TRACT 9446 - Release of bonds Located on the south side of Ninth Str "et, west of Bakpr Avenue, north of the A T 6 3 F Fait mad OWNM Kingsway Construction fompanv 110 West "A' Street, Spite 590 San Diego, California 92101 Performance Bond (Sewer) S60,000 Performance Bond (Water) $82,000 NOTE The sanitary sewer and water system were approved by Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1979 TRACT 9448 - Release of bonds Iocated on the southwest corner of Beryl Street and Banyan Street OWNER meeker 0eveloprent fumpany 132 East Live Oaks Avenue Arcadia, California 91076 ® Performance Bond (Sewer) S29,GJ0 rm Perfoance Bond (Water) S28,DO0 NO-.E The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water 01strict on .hunc 25, 1979. I� A TRACT 9634 - Release of bads L=4ted an the South side of O&Vw Street on the west stile o` Rellman A-enue OWIER: Chna+rce Realty 4010 Pales Verdes ?rive rcrth, Suite 101 Rollins ntlls Estates. Caltfornta 90270 Perfors¢nce Ecyd (Serer) $2 .000 Perfornme 14W water ROTE: The sanitary sewer V4 wattrlSntrt noes Were e a25 r1979j the Catamnga Cowly, t A 17 CITY OF ILVIC11O CUCAMONGA • NEYORANDUM e, aµ DATEt July 5, 1979 TO, City Council PROM: Lloyd Nubbs. Crty Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9135 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Hellman Avenue OWNER: Regency Estates 4010 Palos Verdes Drive North, Suite 101 Rolling trills. California 90273 Perfonnance Flood (Sewer) $30,000 Perforrance 9ond (Mater) $27,000 • Perforwa..ce Bond (Road) NOTE; The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga Canty Water District on June 25, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the reads be accepted The improve- vents include curb, gutter, sidewalks. paving, walls and street signs A u TRACT NO* 9135 1■ 10( LL001r It 111 1((0,00100 O11.L t lawiff110 b fwv6 v [06 1 00 1 1t= 11 W"w "WE 0 L=911d t) 1120100 0 Old 1 OF "Am .IQ w ,([ri01 6 M LOn11 at (I• RNM0 1911 0 Mlf0s6 yr.r 1 ,.@at i 1I 0 I.IItt atfOHaf 1, IM OIYIIU tr.tal9. CY1A.Y a.a r. w• "'lll a......, .�... :.:.`��. +:::�'. •;.:.;'L Mme.. �.: C .::. 0 [,nI f +r• p v v9ar n e 1•ar R Or Y 4Tfm a1.Y' elf ,.@at i 1I 0 I.IItt atfOHaf 1, IM OIYIIU tr.tal9. CY1A.Y a.a r. w• "'lll a......, .�... :.:.`��. +:::�'. •;.:.;'L Mme.. �.: C .::. 0 9 i -I U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN,ONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July S. 1979 T0s City Council FROMs Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUOJEM CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9136 - Accept roads and release bonds- Located north of Apricot Avenue and east of Kirkwood Avenue OWNER: Regency Estates 4010 Palos Yerd. :t Delve North, Suite 101 Polling Hills Estates, California 90274 Performance Bond Sewer S221000 Performance Band Mater $29,000 Performance Bond Road) $64,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucarnnga County Water District on June 25, 1979. The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road imiprovecent plans and it is reconnended that the roads be accepted. The improve - ments include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs. 2z .V 4 N �pp Pi C G TRACT NO. 9136 t. 1.1 [)a4l. or t.• I f.. r)I.o Um. WCIJim C r 111M O f 11 <4 JLYI.1fA 11 kcO D 14 L 11 D lJ Nu. m 11.1. D C41fPfA 1) ` i i M B. 127 ,PGS. BO d B: r �i:az.tr .II.(pT "&Rut as to 1.W6 1.111 : of ! 0.1111 .,,.(f..1. 1.61.1 I's MJV f4.PW J L! ^ ru A a • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR MEMORANDUM TRACT 9337 - Acuep *- roads and release bond ,ocated on the east srJe of Turner Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route ' OWNER: Butler Development 17811 Santiago Boulevard, Suite 223 Villa Park California 92667 y Performance Bond (Road) $170,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as teing in accordance with the road tayrovanent plans and it is recocmended that the roads be accepted. The improve- + ments Include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and street signs U 22 _ 'J t_.+ „ _• -- 8ptitAlgFlp• • � _ _�• •_ ... � �M L��,` 1N :-� «. ^tir.' -:. +-mot • is 1 ,✓ :.I 1, ... I {:; VY ,'•rr'r 1L�vir .J 1 -r . �• 11 1• � I 1 nI• ��^y I LZJ41T.� 1 yT•—•} W M - I Y !. r ry • � •• y }• Il �_� ' FI i _-. Y� I •� 7 it 2 I / ' ;i �• :t� � }',wi is .0 �1i wr •i• � le .JY I 7 i Y ilk t 1 J. iIW S i¢i •' I It tj 1 .e • .. �•''F, ;�•• pz Js.� � e i� s i'iuy_: i� wi s1'J+i�J.J it J. di rrl• � 2 sJi r. �1`�j_21 rot ,- - t� Grl.�ou- - -w -sc.- A�x�f=•3• ----�" �3� j• 1 , i' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: July 5, 1979 TO. City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer suB.i6CT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9422 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the south side of Church Street between Ramona Avenue and Turner Avenue OWNER: Farborough Homes, Inc. _ 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90067 Performance Bond (Sewer) $29,000 Performance Bond ((Water) $39,000 Performance Bond Road) $165,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water systems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on June 25, 1079 The road construction has been approv:,a as being in accordance with the road improvement Mans and it is recommendcd that the roads be accepted The improve- ments include curb, gutter, sidewalks, paving, walls and streat signs. 24 i,INE TRACT N0. 8.137/22.24 Ls. -CONCRETE I R lz a g In In in INDEX MAP F-- 600 �FO. CONC NAIL 005 S 1.--Co (REC ) PER CALTRAN5 s8• i R/W MAP FILE NO 90003 -L T F D. 2" I. P W / C.S BRASS ' 1/4 SECTION CORNER a SECTION LINE PER C S.F B. 535/52 iNLR AVENUE yT NO 5591, M B. G7 /GI -G2 `MPORT WA5 MADE BY RICHARD MILLS ]TES BY E. DUANE LYON, R.0 E 24877, ON ?9, I9'I'7. ICATES COUNTY SURVEVOR'S MONUMENT k ICATES COUNTY SURVEYOR'S FIELO BOOK y71CATES CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRA.NSPORTATIOI4 :=MS BUILDING SETBACK LINE ANO DISTANCE FRAM R/ :A: •ES R .OIAL . %3 EG CURVE DATA. AS SI+OWN ON SHEET. ' AYES IV IRON PIPE TAGGF•D "I .S. S C O(JNp PER :T 9422 -2, M. B. r SOUTH OF THE SOUTH SOUTH SEC-r10 y 0 0 •.w e C i N_ J O • O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer sueAECT: CONSENT CALENDAR TRACT 9582 -1 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue i and Wilson Avenue OWNER: The Deer Creek CoaVanY P 0. Box 265 Alta Loma, California 91 dl Performance Bond (Water) $111.00() Performance Bond (Road) $166,000 NOTE: The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District or June 25, 1979. The road con- struction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plrns and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, walls a,d street signs. u 26 ` IN TNC COUNTS OC CAN LCANArPIVO TM 15' rip ,! n ' t� .ti.. .�.._ ...y �.,�', f • °'� �L.i, J.0 tau. _ i� aea '� tit�G-_�.vao�- S y ! I [s 111 rr � i 41 4 I r 't Y •I � _ # ILL _� r[6 •.tt� YC 4 , i' k. ' ::v.+w. v 1 f•Y..+w .maw. wn. �� " .. ImW1Yme .nir ,- v.... 11 ' ' I � • I t f y_ I { lit •''.�t.• Irl }� Y.n.:11 .n ?i4. NOE1C• AND 8'.);.y7' RY MAP J °�� W. rW r.r. ..nYY 4u.4. 1.• .rtYll W r.uP �YI'V'n IN tN.nrWF •, I:.If.IV. I.lnn•.11W..fn_e Y.• mss• '�,'^C" iL•"} ' A L-sc IN TUE COUNTY OF SAN UL: .- ADD(t:O . amt • ..• e • _^ � —^ - •..Ol( • •PO(.•lll u4 M O �, f E 6 • MCI g All �))' i (lI {( Iii- `�•''�° � r'�.5; a•`' t1 [. � ao t: '• fit � .. � i s � I $iI f• 4 c8 $ i • Y ' •' "L (' tit i all � :t.•. _,ar,. ' .Jrw•._ _'11SLr ". � .iJ! „vti= ` ---�nT � r t .au. �: t � 1 f F► ° u Ali. �rsn _._'e. �_l:ev. .__.w___ itt� +..S »• 7 i9 r,. v�i,6�'E... _•!:�.E�.... ;r'! yr:�i: ^ ?�______.._. •�•. •r±. -. :.G't ]. - #a _.•'t�a•5i;.�YCB:.J Ate!'. :. • IN T1:C COUNTY OF BAN DCANADDINO yl I .O AS h e ; SS •u r d] .� f• w ii�y 1 a _ w.r �NIISON AYLNU( ^>ilao� � • r y� '�� r r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEHORANDUN DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council FRLC:. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENU4R TRACT 9280 - Release of cash staking deposit of $4,000.00 Located between Hellman Avenu9 and Amethyst Streit at lbnte Vista Street OWNER: Bob Jensen Builder. Inc. 226 West 'E" Street Ontario, California 91762 HOTS: thala from L. t Noreen. surveyor, Certification lfinalmflnc�ns have been he has been pa4d in full. TRACT 9350 - Release of cash staking deposit of $1,400.00 Located an the west side of Sapphire Street between Banyan Street and 19th Street Owner: Loma Ranch Homes 2028 Business Center Drive, Suite 145 Irvine, California 92:15 ROTE. thatia`lafinalfmonuments have ebeen set and indi,ates has paid in full. VPc .COUNTY SURVEYOR East Thin! Strut - San Sawdlna, CA 92415 June 22, LTD City of Rancho nicamanir^ P.O. Box 703 Aancno Cacawnga, CA 81730 Attention Mr John L. Vartin Reference. Tract 0280 and 9300 County of San errtadin PUGLCWptl AGDLP fUOeNV,aNf cwna i,Rwr« "'"C'SURVl Y! 1)lal LOJ)it LANG O[Vf LO)MANT 714 1 U32M Al COROi 0 a00NOARV AaV150RV 47I41343101I Please Place the following items on your next agenda for the City of Rancho Cucamngi City Octmcil meeting: Tract 0280 - Lying North of LnVine Street and Fast of IIellrna Avenue. Subdivider- Bob Jensen Builder, Inc. Request City Council release $4,000.00 to rob Jensen Builder, Inc., 226 Vest IT- Street, Ontario, CA 91761 Certification fry L.A. domes, Surveyor, indicates that all final wntments have been set and he has bem paid in full. Tract 0350 - lying South of Banyan Street and West of Sapphire Street. Subdivider: Lima Paneh Acmes Request City Ommoil release $1,400.00 to Lcm Rancb 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, C4 22715 Certification from L.A. Noreen, Surveyor, indicates that 0.11 final momments have been set and he has been paid in full. If yr.t have any gtrstioav Please feel free to tall us ver, truly pxrs, I11Gi`L: r. r_aa relay a yu% r R Rich T. Flour Ina] Dcrmlop:mt Division 1xh � i ° CARL 0000IMN lexd0 /WIRrrRMt .{• 0•] �'¢ i e�! �'- �iLS ✓'t::p' "!rAytt.. 7 t'•.t1i`.x�J"rvW't ELLViIEI0..... Earfenn d 0--K1 TJRO n«,- CLWR"A w k too NAM\tOCR l :OR. OCNNVIi1TR ldN O,AR . aO7t0R6b HE<)R.T, 0ECMR D ..... E]ewbuu dti OOeRt Ubrtstlr :. t `°r✓ ti . lZ ■mss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: My 5, 1979 T0: City Council & City Manger FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: DESIGN SERVICES FOR SIGNAL INSTALLATIOY AT HAVEN AVEIRIE AND AMBER STREET Attached is a proposal from Mohle, Perry & Associates to complete plans and specification for the Chaffey College signal referred to above. Plans for this project wore previously prepared by the County, but specification have yet to be completed. This signal is included in this years budget at an estimated $75,000. Chaffey Colleg9 has consented to contribute $5,625 towards. _ construction of this signal and has disbursed funds to the City. Services provided under the attached scope of work include preparation of pr,- ject specification, contract documents and 30 copies of bid documents. These services are estimated at tSSO plus cost of printing. Mchlo, Perry & Associates are currently completing plan for signal at Base Line and Hellman and Archibald and Church. They were selected for these services based on lowest contract cost. In order to take advantage of on- going cooraination with this firm, the Engineering Divsicn chose not to pursue additional bids for these services. RECO)VIENDATIOR That Council authorize the selection of Mohle, Perry & Associates to provide design bervices for signals at Haven Avenue and Amber Street and to issue a purchase order in the amount of $550 under the terms of the June 25, 1979 proposal. Respectfully s bmitted, i Ll d Hubbs - City Engineer - LH:deb 4 I . �PUS h' ar, - 3�tf' w`• wr?��. �' .Y'F%mJt',r.,�ai5'h�•,�'S.�'w�, °i'i`i .:. PY.- "' :.�.�„ra°.�'° 0 .. . e;% .per : = . •• - • y,•.... r. ., •t_J ^3 y+l•; rA?•T Z:l i.'"]•S i•.•i:! h•F:'+ '1, a s:aw77a.; �i:,;i �.r • -:�. -g• =-h'^ '3 t.:r i a }'��,yyf, r,•:c •r"n 'lfyf,��,, t�_!,'f..jq`,��- �.`'�.`,� v. �r +�%v= ;�•�,:i r:(,w `;:ta.�s:w3..:..1' i.��i/�,'j ': Wl4tiY. \%i J7:�}. f�'j(•7• +�: t � ^,+"C�'?S +F� l r. "'•' i n`_M ::.•�. rrv+• At���' ;�:!�t`i`�•,b"ltrre'LSf�d� /�t�� f+u +�+�:Yr- !•�¢,�j�,i i Si 3t �.Y (?Va.,t �. f - ✓Y{t,•'� 1_4.-!" r. Y.r�,W • �-t;. twi Y "; • � Y s3+,�F'S�` GJ;, '���.•S.yt1M•i•i l A., r •- 4• i;• '� w"•s.ucV:$ *'i`,', IS�ts�ri.:i;Y. :iii -.'L' • rtf) J'••.'``•J•,Gt.K "..':a:Y':�ly'2 �'P��l•''^^ „xt: +r••..:,,�t,, .•. �;'n6 1' rt.. iY yil, ,awij♦ .�.^ a - °•/ •:,_,i. 60•.� y1 J..,+ .u•. .; -, . - }tp•••21'. �.� �aCU _. .:I- f• ., 1.a :•w.. :hr. !^ 1 • -r. L iw: �+.+:.•. �c all G:u �.,':.4•('•'yw.. w,:d. c:�,`•M ^.� \/^hro•.:• ar c; •rw;; MOHLE•FERRYdA'i5'J01ATES ,^,l.Y• 1 ai'i•'' r 7-.4., r. ,,.ii :, •�. < 't `)! l.. ' ,. :l,i..:::r•p.::Ci'�., �' y:,�.'1�t rf3. l,u:i L "-rt.�.`.^.+.......7..,rt .,r,.yf ti.'id,;.:��,1,�j�'..4.._, C.�.::,,i: i •.tr:$,.3fr.,cpiz%��,'. t:��, ?. ':: ,',!1..? .�¢'�+.f,'J?'"^ - ..- :')..i:l= .- Z7<1.�jq:' +r ,,. -,n.. , ` .r _;� � -dy: l: i l:• _.W �.i �, r {•'�rt� ?fie•' �•..q_,_... •:�.. • .. Iri• - i.l•., {� .4. _, „ •,•li • t nI M1-i J♦ _'•i(:1..:- ti ^, Hr. Lloyd Hubbs • _ _ .. _ .. _. _.... _ _ J. City Engineer �'i •z - _ ... ,cJrt_. - City of Rancho Cucamonga I , Post Office Eor 793 - " •��"•” `• Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ^ _ -' q } • ` ' Attention: Hr. Paul Rouganu ._ ` .. ... .... •. -�, `= Subject: Intersection o` Haven Avenue and Amber Lane •` Propose' for Specifications and Estimate for Sigaali:ation Project ..�.: • r Dear Hr. Hubbs: • Wa appreciate the oplvrtunity of submitting this proposal to prepare the • ' specifications and engineer's estimate for the signalization of the inter- section of Haven A cam and Amber Lane. This proposal in based upon our meeting at rho City on June 21, 1979• Sco ,e of Work,.., _ , c . �'�,. . ,,a ,.:r !, "i -)•LL•,:Jt:. The propised scope of •work is as follovas �• ' ••. ,.; - - Specification Preparation — - .. "'. ••-I•s T��.. ,,�.r, - ^+; ;i;�1•;r; �• i • •+I JV..+1, R , '7 .. •:' >, .• ' 't. :� -J, •+ .'i 1 t^`�I�i •rLU! Uning the Chia p � repared lane a ecific -tions for a can - federal aid ` project uslug the current State Specifications for the technical ° {�•' "'� details will be prepared. J,,,•. a•',..t'•a.� n %:iw.. Since the City does not currently have an established format for • -�• j-- s'•:,^ specifications, HPA will utilize a format deemed desirable by EPA tor' - thiu project. n: - I- y :i;• •ktojk'�it�"(i ... �r , r .. r .. a . '� l,, 4ti i��` 1:1•'51/2'1 Engineer '& Estimate —.ri •`'h +i, '• '1 `'j`Jr•�' nf- ���i ?}�r r _. •_•i.,17.1' .. ^' •• ••t p 'r;f. i:.:�k ', • :':.If�S1�, ..'., �rYC;'l -+ =f N -f. 6: a HPA vill prepare an uz:imate of the construction cost in accordance r'i•;;�?•ti;T -• with cosmnn praccico for signal estimate preparation. ,,r, ••+- ^' 1, ;�;r CITY OF ftFRCkO CUCAMOkCq' •''1'µi: +Jj�� I i >i- 'J�3't"'+S" ej 'ii �v`•' i:wit•i'•r.'�'- i i COE64U41TY PEVCI OP11E.a.T DEPi.C"• ��7.,` .,.Ln�»;.�t.t�rv, ,e•-.'�,.•,,_.� ..� r,... war ,f r••a„ , = y .'ii 4iJ• °' ^ 11 ;; ui, : r. —• St JUN 27.19!9 5• - r !'1:,(.. %x':j'' ,t'y,fc. ..t:tt..,r�4f'.` ('4:r' Ci-sL Xe4..,• � , Y'i ).• �i co _3• ';,T{nr '••r. {ts- +ri.Y+.St,... -. .r ..�h:•y •t-• . +4J •AY ..'.,:). '. •1..1,5 '- __PN �. ;Y. -,' it. i^: vi+ H 'aVt1Tt�•'.!«IL_rc.1�l:r+,ty.i,: i;.!lM: t'°IT.� ��•t Raj.:" l •,1:.:: ^�i'.:c•tli`MiC'Y�4'rv:. •r:: Y MCiAlW101RAH9C2NTgN OVGMIR3 r t. 2esd ECWM=AW.&A*Mf14Aat CA025.T 4A • • xL -Aci; C Hr. Lloyd Hubbs" pr v- M 4, rl M City of P nchu Cucamonga V ....... F ^,., 11aven & Amber - proposal" June IM Page 2 P;S4;.. 41-1 z- 11 •,. I • I . , 41, V ev •istion o t Plea at For purposas of bidding to be done by the city, MPA will prepare 30 sets of specifications including reduced copies of the plans to be bound together to form the "aid peckage." • Proiect Costs Xrt , it is propocad the services required be provided on & time and i Mteral basis in accordance with the attached hourly rates with a "not to exceed" amount of $550. The coat of reproducing the specification and plan booklets Is proposed to be ojid for an an actual invoice cost basis to MP4 in awMitxon to the professional services fee. The reproduction costs are •stimated to be "25 to $250. Time Schedule We are proparei to start work upon notice to proceed from the City and can have the work completed within two weeks 1116 1 1 It Please give me a call if you have any questions or need additional info%nna-1 tion. 1 -1, Respectfully submitted, MOEMZ. PMW & ASSOCLATES r • 31 17 4 04 R. Henry Pohle 'r - Senior Vice President J RH41vpa attachment 4 -v- MOHat, PERRY E ASSOCIATES "d •�, ^ _ . , _.._ ,, _ •. 1 . ... ' .:.w.4:..aGwil.,1 °i r.M:iAl: \)_ ",`.:Y•.R r.•.��I A.L •... ' " ��• t.:).t Lx�;}�: }�e`•�t•41- .�..,.— .�7,;.t:hi'i , �! <�i,:n`� ti'; %€r.�+n , /tza4.v _ "`% +n.K 'e Y? - _ . • .1 r,1,C1 `.,'r:•_ Y "'•V_-•.e .l�XiW.��•Y.°.. `.:4- `j!,�G'\ _ �.I�M -=1 a. ,� - w .. •_•�. �AS:CU Li :Sdd •.. Ne7.:up_...._ ��A U15:.• .+.a !a- f.•..:y..,•> ...h . •t` ., i4» t: fi{ ii l,�i7iJi'�;R�'�:� i ro7•,�n,- }?j�.::. :!I•- "��Ch".• ^ott'i:r"r ?r.Y,.�, ^�r?l�: ?`_ p•.. �i i` �w .. L. ).•.. !•.1 `Z `' {, Nf! i.jri %yt•'N'.4.:'1. r. .. `9.,w,;F ^.i�Ic21. to }` <a t �t.�('fJ'� •.Y .•'[. , I'. :.r, a � +Vqpi il•'� -F,. iiiY! °�i.l. •�(i: 1 }..�'.. :1.��.T _.u�•f�.�ip•l ••* /.A•II '.'� ^� 'w . .'.4.•n 1•tt.�L.... •�a`••Fin�1CYf� 70gWgN e)GfEDli• "• i WEQnpn Am $A* M A/ntmt CA OMbI • (7M) 4 e SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES - ' EFFECTNE JANUARY 1, 1979 wj Principal w: - - :•; -- 545.00 - -'.i. 1.• ., - .- _ .kssociate�- •.haw. �•t .=r tC:• ..: sF' "- .:.A 39.00 ,....r..7 r •r: 4 n.. a ...,r•; T ansportation �- '•36 •. �K.,. - '° �Nrc »•r ?•Y.*RSr: - ,� `T•.- -•.,•R w.,� Civil Engineei 36.00 Architectural Planner 36.00 Landscape Planner - 36.00 Designer .. .. •' 30.00 " Inspector _ 27.00 Senior Draftsman ; •, 1 - 26.00 - Assistant Transportation Engineer 26.00 -' Assistant Civil Engineer'' 26.00 <, ' <ssistant Architectural Planner� 26.00 Assistant Landscape Planner 26.00 y nr ^ "•,; .. ,• Assistant Draftsman z •+" i 21.00 „•;. Cleriarl �l _•, __,;;� .. - - +•fY�" 16.00 • :` - ;,:.'�di - _ Engineering Technician' 'x_` v.1 -•• ••^ 12.00 t:n \ •ice x:e--'• -tlj% 2 -Man Survey Party -` •- I G .. _ 70-00 , '' :. _�• _ •3 ,., r , , ,, ., t -Man Survey Party _ 80.00 •16C ''•;r'•,,,�,•, mileage Rates per mica s(;';, -. ^�• -� - ,•si, • 1 .•.f.'.bj�l ),`i x•_1::''.1 %.1r'. •dn.'1; r qua ,n:'N �.+ •'1 ` -r I -•G v.dti�y.�;5.. iM'•,;° i • i ` ..:ii, !1 -pn' :1%,1 d�air.♦ '° `• :� ^...., t I r_�{ <. ••,' ..,J �.\y j�•SIf1 •y �5441f.I I!„ • ', /},Y .••1. �l�t'•h Y'a �.IV +•,�•' 1pig-,-„`li. ,.j ., i4» t: fi{ ii l,�i7iJi'�;R�'�:� i ro7•,�n,- }?j�.::. :!I•- "��Ch".• ^ott'i:r"r ?r.Y,.�, ^�r?l�: ?`_ p•.. �i i` �w .. L. ).•.. !•.1 `Z `' {, Nf! i.jri %yt•'N'.4.:'1. r. .. `9.,w,;F ^.i�Ic21. to }` <a t �t.�('fJ'� •.Y .•'[. , I'. :.r, a � +Vqpi il•'� -F,. iiiY! °�i.l. •�(i: 1 }..�'.. :1.��.T _.u�•f�.�ip•l ••* /.A•II '.'� ^� 'w . .'.4.•n 1•tt.�L.... •�a`••Fin�1CYf� 70gWgN e)GfEDli• "• i WEQnpn Am $A* M A/ntmt CA OMbI • (7M) 4 e RESOLUTIO4 NO. 79-53 A RECOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARCINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTFNTION TO VACATL A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON HAP FO. V -001 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamooga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to procred under Section 8300, et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Var-ation Act of 1941 SECTION 2: That the City Coun -il hereby declares its intention to vacate a portion of Arroyo Vitta Avenue a City street, as shown on Map No V -001 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, he let day of August, 1979, at 7:00 p.m., in the Carnelian Elementary School Multi - Purpose ro, M. located at 7104 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamorga, • California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its deteeming whether Raid City street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to be pasted conspicuously along the line of the street or pirt thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days beforn the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not lees than tree signs shall be posted, each of which shall hive a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one Inch in height: "'MICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET." SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record SECTION 6: fns City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be published once in a newspaper published in the City 10 days before the date set for the hearing. l y SECTION 7: The City Clerk Shall certify to the paeaaRe and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be In full force. a1 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED :his day of 1979. ATrESTt City 'Clerk y••ii�� -t'� .r `3�K }}a,° .�i'4���Tkl a�'i.��il�'S`7y eraL+..f•� 'a. '1 :R � -'a�, l�.f CITY OF 'tANCHO CUCt IONGA I MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1979 TO: City Council d City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer suBJEci: STREET VACATION AT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE The ornernofnBasenLinecandnCarnell nfStreetahas*eliminamteedethe need fortthest extension of a street Arroyo Vista Avenue, which now dead -ends :t the south boundary of the complex. At the attached correspondence explrins, the ap- proval of the c mplex involved the decision by the Planning Commission that the dead -and portion of Arroyo Vista Avenue be vacated. This. was due to the fact that a tmthat teportion of flthe sire bt would now serve no public purpose and _ The attached Resolution of Intention to vacate the street will begin the public hearing process required by law. Your approval of the Resolution ® is recommended. Respectfully submitted, Ll. Hubbs City Engineer LH:deb i. r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd Hub9s, City Engineer SUBJECT= STREET ABANDONMENT FOR CARNELIAII CENTER At the Planning Commission meeting of March 14, 1979, approval was given to Director Review 79 -15, the construction of a professional office complex at the southeast corner of Base Line iuid Carnelian Street. As a condition of approval, the dead end of Am:yo Vista Avenue against the south property line of the complex will be vacated and the property deeded to the two ad.. ,latent property owners. These owners have agreed to accept the Iroperty. The attached scheme for the reconstruction of the intersection of Arroyo Vista Avenue and Caluma Court has been sent to the Crowell /Leventhal Company for it's use in fulfilling the conditions of approval It is essentially the "knuckle° option preferred by the Commission, modified to disrupt the existing properties as little as possible. Details of design will be subject to further approval of the City Engineer. The legal process for the street vacation will require a Resoluti�n by the City Council of intent to vacate, setting a hearing date for 15 days there- after. Posting of the intent fir a period of 10 days is required. After the public hearing, the Ordinance effecting the vacation and autharizing the conveyance of the property can be passed and the deeds prepared. These procedures are now being implemented by the staff and plans underway by the developer. 0 r ,�w ^�5 L' ���ysr -.'l3"1-gA'+�,NT"'E..�bi. °nt•+ �Grki I ,J'! /ti-✓!U -� Cenlr' ` n715 s Tax (,,Je Area '6007 ' r G 4 0 . f - 01,Y4 4C O t P - _' Q O / n 0 Q n J 4 Al W. r q • o � � fV n w.`'� 11 m pA 173,)1 N ) ,/3 7• I �i X903 r44 I1 ° �� : Jr. 30 ° i o :.rev •/e i\ . L .to G vs' — rc a g° ��� .avJ3 a ♦.lmv vl v �1 , 0,,10 OG L 1 Ip U ri N p J / -C •r JD JO V V n VJ ,zo `W �1 °° �• d O vpi a m fti ° m m mO 1 ' L 1 3 c0 Go Ql J Q 7403 ON •101J J V ti'J b p p O °' v q O riot IPA % 9 .d Ga os ' ef43 " VISTA 119 AVENUE •'-£n YO 14 S ..� nV ,3'>G2 � ..+3 tf'/ 1 nor° Gd r +J • IJZ 1� 3 ;•� lJ— s1.B•Z� 41 a q J { fig 4 p 0 @m ^Laltt ul co co co Area to 0 be 12q t• t+J +!Y Vacated -- AVENUE - CARNELIAN -- -- -- -- - - — _ ,• (� • O Orc ' Assessor's Map L Book 207 Page56 `j .,., _ ► ,v,DO' San Bernardino County ..ter . ... ,..,.,.`, �.,... . AS \ n p /.d ove. barrkoa� ,tzw- oivnoc. �Ly �9vJ�/ R ' A } J. :j i • h IdVG LC. PAYEHENT* rib Stdr.dlk, rb; qu}ter %r�c cr 5,*& rb f 9uHrr 0 Qj W N r Qlarpo�,gZ6 � ovo >eT617 - — - � REr e F-11 4* level o� i y adjr�evt� I' y �°. YLlId Recc N ^ o CoN N ♦ � CI R ReN S r � 4 x 7 B b o $TRFET Uor1T , .�"• ^ a :� V 4 a I Riamr OP way Q C -♦ J s 4 a h 3 O 0 lea, h i • h IdVG LC. PAYEHENT* rib Stdr.dlk, rb; qu}ter %r�c cr 5,*& rb f 9uHrr 0 Qj W N r RESOLUTION NO 79-54 e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, LYIUNTY OF SAY BEN.NARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IN-IE'TTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLMAN AVENUE AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. V -002 Ott PILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE Clrf CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Raac he Cucamonga as toilows: SECTION 1: Thet the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8700, at seq of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. IECTIO4 2: That the City Council hereby declares Its lttentlon to vacate A portion of Hellman Avenue a City street, as stows on Nap No. V -002 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto narked Exhibit "A" and by refare,ce made a part hereof - SECTION l: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 1st day of August, 1979, at 7:00 P.m., In the Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpose room, located at 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucaxnga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objet tang to the proposed vacation for the purrase of its deterring whether said City street is necessary for preseut or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to by pn.ted ronspicuoully along tie line of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearlog, not more thin 100 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each o, which shall have a copy of this resolution an them and shall have the fallowing title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "90, CE OF HEARTNG TO VACATE STR ?ET " SECTION 5: The subject vacation stall be subject to the rovervations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall cause this resolution to by published once In a newspaper published in the City 10 days before the date set for the hearing SECTION 7: Tito City Clerk Shall certify to the passage std idop Li•m A this resolution, and It chall thereupon take effect and be in full force PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of , 1979. ® Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk � I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MFd:ORA.NDUM GATE: July S. 1x79 TO: City Council A City Manager rpim: Lloyd Hubbs. City Engineer suwECTs RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLMAN AVENUE Coug Hone of Hellman Avenue Associates has approached the City concerning his development on the southeast corner of Heilman Avenue and Base Line. Part of the development process has included a review of street alignments namely Base Line and Hellman Avenue. Both streets are presently involved in recon- structicn under the direction of County personnel. It has been determined that a portion of Hellman Avenue dedication is unncessary to the needs of the public due to realignment and additional dedications made on the crest side. • It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution attached. • Respectfully su fitted. LIO.0 Hubbs City Engineer LH:deb u �Z • _, .,I C: 1Ii CL W S l l cr- Area i. Lt. ` N�\ vu.ftd \�', / /� , l�il� VIII � ("��I.i I i � L I V - -06Z The DAILY REPORT, Mon. Ju N M IM.' .5 C� 8 pm to B pm Leaves mediation possibility open • :a spurns resignanon can " 5 pm l0 7 pm of this opportunity to be heard and to present their News r regarding the allocation of Rooenue Sharing funds. ' -astern hfansirm where enral hundred SatdWSla Blandon, near the Pan Amerlua Iilehvaa ryoretha! have held elf eof Somata'° why ,h, 114 World repo tion at the city offices located at 9320 -C Baseline Road. 'tom units Ydeeht thmwhy all Il can aI es throwta on"•• I The hexer bnmbtaf tr.traed atoms of elvllua tmN+ evt appamidty tailed 6arlr 5aada) the i Sandidlo" claimed dcltxr wise (.Neang church nation o dislodge the rebels who � t herm In the ci'low, Rejecting OAS calls fqr noth.1 the holed up to cmerete Man ago Surviving contrasting his tnop ing, Somsn�.Qp purdsmao battled their tough add conciliatory hearty pledfes of joy atty nn!ortxd bunkers way with a Segbound starrments Sunday were from the comdunden PP We am.tmunf the war mmitult to A uhuctilie r made In two epeechn — the Np1iecadragua's If states — a m nearby colvtepe fill. Bret to Ms national guard that cm Sandinista and Sonnrs knows IL a me suernOa told a IIPI leader where they listened m the cornmanAers. Iha seeood In eider aald would cost thtm motographer in Santo Sandlnnus celebrate their a televised address to the their li e price CITY OF RANCHO edicted I CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING - • .rrr "m a pr ceaing of tern fddaM All a barrel Arebun Itat 'niamer it to whw•h the prlcn nrastrr and lighter Notice Is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Er, a "tl sire ddeed Rancho Cucamonga will hold a public hearing on July 5 at we currrnt official prim Ireda" fiat is Rf H a 7 00 p.m. In the Multi - purpose Room of Camelian Memen- ♦i a" . m 46 bike mpg tary School located at 7105 Carnellan Street, Alta Loma• to d be an increase 01 44 discuss the proposed use of the City's General Revenue rm the ra:rent tight Sharing Funds In relation to the fiscal 1979 -80 City budget -et none uN map` snen except of the Salor Citizens of Rancho Cucamonga will be given the o ortunl- 9 9 PP bta a•e adhered m the ty to make written and oral comments and to ask questions r price Jiarg have concerning the entire budget and the rela!lonshlp of Reve- nse d surcharge nue Sharing funds to It. CLINICS The proposed use of the Revenue Sharing funds (an es. TIME timated $185.189 entitlement 10 and $185.189 entitlement f Is to provide for the ongoing operations and 0 pm to 8 pm providing nanco expenditures of tree Shorllfs contract in providing a a She law enforcement services In fiscal 1979 -60. C� 8 pm to B pm Senior citizens and organizations representing the Interests y of senior citizens are particularly encouraged to make use " 5 pm l0 7 pm of this opportunity to be heard and to present their News ® regarding the allocation of Rooenue Sharing funds. ' Rem its a owq A copy of the proposed budget will be available for Inspec- ,ccvurxxt ms acansa rNen, «Om.Nw• tion at the city offices located at 9320 -C Baseline Road. pen Mondaymmuyr6 Written comments will be received In the City Clark's Officor 01414f0 Cen p1f 14 � until 5.00 p.m. July S. 1979.) ►) / ORDINANCE NO. 77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR111A, EXTENDING ORDINANCE N0. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION It The City Council finds and determines that there has eeninadequate time for the Planning Commission to complete studies concerning appropriate regulations for adult businesses, and that the term of Ordinance No. 45 should be ex- tended. SECTION 2: Section 5 of Ordinance. No. 45 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby amended to read as fol- lows: ,± "SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall remain t ink - until February 1, 1980, and during such period, all ordinances in- " consistent with the provisions hereof shall be suspended and superseded by this Ordinance.". SECTION 3: The City Council floes hereby find and declare that this Oi rdinance is for the immediate preservation of the pub - lic peace, health and safety, and it shall take effect immod- lately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance. i SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark :s all attest to the same, and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after " its passage, at least once in The DaiIX Report, a newspaper of i general circulation, published thn ..1ty of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1979 AYES: F, NOES: ABSENT: • Mayor ATTEST: • M E M O R A N D U M Date: June 28, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Re: Community Development Block Grant, City -County Agreement The above referenced agreement, as amended and forwarded by Council to County, was determined unacceptable by the latter. (See attached letter) This rejection was predicated on the amended agreement 'specifically" giving the City a cancellation option As the City was 'allocated $517,600+ over a three year period, with an unequal distribution duringg that period (356,167+ in first year, $0 second year and $161,833+ during third year), the County could not accept that the City would terminate association after first year, 33% of program time frame, having expended 69% of total program money. From the County's viewpoint, this reluctance to sign the amended agreement is understandable Further, the County has now added a new paragraph (page 2, paragraph 2) which "specifically" states Z:ity will execute t e Cooperation Agreement in 80 -81 and 81 -82 Briefly stated, the Council options are as follows: 1) Sian no agreement with County and compete for Small City un n rom U�ls a poor choice as money s scarce and not assured Further, Block Grant funding would not be available to us using this approach. To excercise this option would put City in a bad light politically with citizens from the target area, as it would cost us half -a- million dollars in capital neighborhood i,aprovements that will no, otherwise be funded 2) Sian a one year only agreement with County, rather than one three year agreement Inis option n -so has drawbacks of diminishing our "assured" three year project budget of $517,6001 by 66% We would have to then discuss available funds each year with County Further,this reduction in funding would not give us available capital to do projects scheduled in 79 -80 31 Sign agreement with Ccunt• wou ena a co a o ubti taed to City This mp et on ecm approved by Council on November 20, 1978 page O 2 page 2 of 2 Memo 6/28/79 To: CM & C C From: B Holley Re: CDBG Staff Comments The Covnty has lined up their forces, including County Counsel and the Supervisors Office, behind this latest agreement The County is dealing from a position of leverage, we are not It would not be of benefit to the City, financially or politically, to not make use of the CDBG funding, which at this time is available to us only through the County Staff Recommendation: Exercise Option 'T' r� U If you have any questions on this matter prior to July 5, please • give me a call. BH1=4 1 7 F II�VIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY :— a ^�lY� °I Son 6•rnord/i�ntoer n 11NNIfm•NtP a.. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT(OCO) 'i `i,�"�e•" 7111 Ean min sue" San B,me,dj,,. CA 82415 (7141383-7745 Juno 25, 1979 Mr. Lauren Wasserman, City Nana9er City of! Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline - Unit P Rancho Cucamonge, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Wasserman, Contract The Cucamonga CCityyCouneLl is unacceptable ceptable as submitted. macho • the city of funding for one $1720533.00, the It is not now Possible that an amended contract can be era - euted by both the Board of SUPervieo-s aId the City Council by June 30, 1979. Therofore, on July It 1979, a valid con- tract will not exist betwoon the City and COUnty. Please do not incur any cost which you desire to be reimbursed from the San Bermrdino County Community Block Grant until such tine as a valid contract is fully osecutod. Think you for your COaPsrotion. r1AFIRDt1MENTAL IMPROVENENI AGENCY OFFICE OP \ ITY DEVELOPMENT R. -AI3•RAL Director1/- ✓ • " RAS,Dti,em cc, Cal McElwain, Suporvisor Second District Robert B. Rigney e.dn .. •p t ^t rA. ^SLP �t MOfiMyNaNSJ'kaf.C9 r ^N mY„e, e0e6 +f e. M,ONtV s. +.r.•p tt> I CAL VA "AM 4.1s%-rc e0 t !A,•Oev +, The Cnm;wnity Development Block Grant City County Agreement for Fiscal Years 1979 -80, 1980 -81, 1981 -82 is in the June 20, 1979 Agenda packet, page 20 Please refer to this for the complete contract The followinn pages are additions for your information • 11 0 1 2 orated tree and pope' 3 and desires that its '¢carp 4 WHEREAS, the CITY is willing levels to the 5 the base used by HUD to determine funding 6 lotion be included in ram sad accord- 7 ,s Community DeveloPmG6t program, 8 COUNTY for the execution of COUNTY s community development 9 ;¢ the execution o£ COUNTY+ 10 g ingly, to cooperate with COUNTY during program years 1980 -81 11 9 orate boundaries of CITY 12 0 plan and program within carp s fiscal year 1979 -BO grant 13 1 p approval of COUNTY' 14 2 sad 1981 -82, commencing upon the apP 15 3 16 and, 17 i4 application; {B ; order to 19 16 183,634 00 fa 17 has ccepted a budget advance of S 20 18 WHEREAS, the CITY 4.,2(,_7f 21 SgM 19 se constru�.lon contracts for recreation and atree 22 Cooperation Agreement i¢ program 23 20 achieve the economies of 2' 21 to execute the RAID tees that 25 22 improvements agrees herein and the CITY understands and agrees 25 23 and seven (1981 -82) 27 24 years six (1980-81) 634.00 from year six and seven CITY food 25 28 26 the COUNTY will withhold the total $183+ 29 30 allocations; and 31 32 30 33 31 and CITY seek to coordinate their efforts to maximize 34 32 WHEREAS, both COIMY and economies in 35 33 and tortes efficiency 36 34 utilization of personnel and resources 37 35 Program hercioafter sec forth; 38 36 the planning and administration of the p 8 39 37 40 38 p and between the parties hereto 41 39 OOD AND AGREED Y 42 40 NOW, THEREFORE, IT 1S UhT1ERST 43 41 44 42 as follows! 45 43 46 44 provisions of Article 1, Chapter 47 45 Pursuant to the P 48 46 1 This agreement is made P 49 47 ¢; the Government Code of the State of California (cam- 50 48 5, Division 7, Title I agencies The purpose of this 51 49 relating to public 52 50 with Section 6500), assts- 53 mencin8 unit development and housing 54 51 52 agreement is to undertake those essential community roved by NUD, for the CITY of 55 Lance activities under the Act which have r projects efts described in Attachement ^A" 56 tv 55 eciEically the project or p j 56 RANCHO CUCAHONGA sp 1411040Jl. ".301 ( ' / 9 ATTACHMENT A City of Rancho Cucamonga 1979 -80 CDBG PROJECTS AND FUNDING LEVELS PROJECT FUNDING AMOUNT Stree` Improvements $ 222,474 Recreation Improvements 100,000 Contingency 33,693 Total: $ 35G,167 1981 -82 CDBG PROJECTS AND FUNDING LEVELS PROJECT is Recreation Improvements Contingency arm /5/15/79 I] FUNDING AMOUNT $ 127,740 33,693 Total: $ 161,433 60b • , SECTION 3 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN AUTHORITY CThis Section 3 Action Plan for employment and business opportunities* has been prepared by the Office of Community Devolcpment, County of San Bernardino, pursuant to section 3 of the Housing and Urban Develop- ment Act of 1968, as amended, 12 O.S.C. 1701u. PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to.comply with those section 3 require- ments so that to the greatest extent feasible, opportunities for training and employment shall be given to lower income residents of CDBG assisted project areas, and that contracts for work in connection with such projects be awarded to businesses located in or are owned in substantial part by project area reaidents. DEFINITION OF TERXS LOWER IttCO.NE RESIDENT - A person in the CDBG project area or areas • of the County of San Bernardino whose annual income is less than 80 percent of the median income in the SHS4 $9,439 which is less than $7,551. PROJECT - The County of San Bernardino is the prime target or project area. However, the County has designated target areas for CDBG projects. Priority shall be given to persons living within the CDBG projects ,r target area and to businesses owned in substantial part by COBG project or target area residents. (See attached maps for designated project or target areas). (Attachment 'A"). PROJECT OR TARGET AREA BUSINESS - Those business firms that are located within the project or target area or those firms which are 518 or more owned by persons residing within '.he project or target area. L 6/ El S CONTRAC°OR - Any entity which performs work for the County in connection with the CDBG program. SUB - CONTRACTOR - Any entity (other than a pars°° who is an employee of a contractor) which has agreed or arranged with a contractor to undertake a portion of tb• contractor's obligation in the performance of work in connection with the County CDBG program. PROGRAM ACTION EM4ENTS A. To facilitate compliance with the section 3 regulations on CDBG funded contracts, the County shall initiate the following actions to insure utilization of lower iaceme project or taiget area residents as employees or trainees., 1. The County shall establish and maintain a directory of service organizations, job referral agencies and manpower training programs operating within or servicing project or target area residents. 2. The County shall disseminate this affirmative action plan to those agencies and organizations listed on the above referenced directory, as well as to contractors organizations and labor unions. 3. The County shall disseminate its affirmative action Policy to the public via news media sources that serve project or target area residents. 4. The County shall incorporate its affirmative action policy in all invitations or advertisements to bid on CDEG funded projects. S. The County shall incorporate the section 3 clause in all contracts for work. (see Attachment B). 6- 'Mbe Co=*Z7 shall incorporate their Afi_mative Action Plan Cin ail cst=acts for work. 0 . 7- Prior to the award of A contract, the County $hall require the prospective contractor to submit a signed assurance that be or she will cam?iy with Section 3 Reculations and aeauireaants of this plan 1 see Attachment -C -). t- Prior to tbM signing of a contract the County Shall require the pr=s?eC'--ive C trar+nr to P=Vide a preliminary statement of work farces needs iMrI"Af g training posittoas. 9. '-Ile Comt^y o11a11 provide the directory of organizations and i agencies sewing project or target area zesidents to the oa=t-,i.-t= for use in recruiting needed labor. 19. 'She =°^` -' °^- shall notify theta amity organizations Cof available employment oppertanities and shall maintain ra=ids of response from these organizations. i1. --S z-=tz3ct-.r shall make — tin=al personal recruitment e:ffortz directed at aL' se_rvice organizations, schools with lcrc inane resident students, recruitment organizations and lower income resident training organizations with which be is ?$.chino_ 12. '1°x ta=ts ctor shall maintain a file of the name and addresser y ea8 7=4 income resident worker referred to him and what ac -`boa was trice with respect to each such referred worker, and if the worker was not employed, the reasons therefore. 113- 75e C,ttractsr shall promptly notify the County when the a A= or aaioms with wbam the contractor has a collective baraa 4 agreement has not referred to the contractor, a low ismae resident worker Sent by the contractor or the 49 contractor has other information that the union referral process has impeded him in his efforts to meet his goal. 16. For prime contracts that exceeds $500,000 and to every sub- contract on that job exceeding $50,000, the County shall require proaptctive contractors to submit with their bids affirmative action plans which, at a minimums - Establish goals for utilization project on target area residents and businesses. - Establish steps taken or to be taken to accomplish these goals. Establish steps which have been taken or will be taken to secure the cooperation of subcontractors and unions in meeting these goals. 15. In order for a contractor to establish that he has made a good • faith effort to employ or fill training positions with lower income project or target area residents he shall, as a minimum, provide evidence that he hest (a) Attempted to recruit from the project or target area local advertising media, signs placed at the job site, and community organizations, public and private agencies operating within or serving the project or target area, such as the State Employment Development Department, Urban League, Operation Second Chance, Wcstside Community Development Corporstion or Inland Manpower Association. (b) Maintained a list of all lower income area residents who have app:ied either on their own or on referral from any source and employed such persons if otherwise qualified and if openings exist. -q61� B. To increase the utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project area, the • County shall initiate the following actions: 1. At the beginning of each CDBG program year, the County shall set forth the approximate number and dollar value of contracts to be awarded doting the project year by busineas type. 2. The County shall develop a list of business concerns within the project or target area doing business in professions o• occupations identified as needed. 3. The County shall advertise for bids in news media sources serving the project o- target area. 4. The County shall send invitations to bid to appropriate ' project or target area businesses identified in 2 above. S. Prior to award of any contract, the County shall require a signed assurance from the contractor that to the greatest extent feasible, subcontracts for labor and materials will be let to qualified project or target area subcontractors and vandors. 6. The County shall provide the list of project or target area businesses (2. above) to contractors upon award of contract. 7. The contractor shall contact project or target area contractor organizations or organizations likely to yield project or target area contractors for referral of prospective sub- contractors. C. To facilitate compliance with the section 3 regulation on CDBG funds that are being utilized by the County, •Contract Cities*, Special Districts and Self Governed- Special Districts, the County -5- �5 shall initiate the following actions to insure utilization of lower income project or target area residents an employees or trainees and the utilization of businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the project or target area, the County shall initiate the followinq actions: 1. The County shall require that the 'Contrast Cities*, *Special Districts*, and 'Self Governed- Sractal Districts•, as well as it's contractors and subcontractors establish as part of tLeir Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and business opportunities, steps as described in A and a above, to assure that to the greatest extent teasible opportunities for training and employment are being given to lowec income project or target area residents, and that contracts are awarded to business concerns located in the project or target area. 2. The "Contract Cities', "Special Districts', and -Self Governed - Special Districts- shall reference in their section affirmative action plan for employment and business, the County of San Bernardino's Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and business opportunities. 3. The County shall require that the "Contract Cities*, 'Special Districts', and 'Self Governed - Special Districts', shall report on foray: described by the County, on a monthly bacis, their results of extending employment and business opportunities under Section 3. (See attached reporting forms - Attachment 'D'). S -6' 6Z PROGRAM MONITORING CIn order to establish that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities . • for training and employment are being given to lower income project area residents, and that contracts are awarded to business concerns located --in the project are; the County shall conduct -on -site and record -monitoring of all contracts. Monitoring resoonsibilities for the OCD Contract Administrator _.. -• will include, but not limited to: - — __, - Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by 'contract Cities ", •Special Districts*, "Self Governed - Special Districts', -, contractors and subcontractors to recruit lower income project or target area residents. - Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by 'Contract Cities•, - •Special Districts', 'Self Governed - Special Districts*, • Y contractors and subcontractors to utilize project or target area residents as employees or trainees. Documenting and evaluating the steps taken by "Contract Cities', -- .— •Self Governed - Special Districts *, contractors and subcon- tractors to utilize subcontractors and businesses located in or owned in substantial part by persons residing in the -•- project area. - The County will evaluate the Section 3 Affirmative Action Plan for employment and business opportunities on a semi - annual basis. The semi- annual report as produced by the OCD Contract Administrator will address the following: - Progress to date • - Employment • 67 - Business ® - Comparisons with goals and timetables - Employment - Business - Recommended corrective actions (if needed) - In employment - In business SANCTIO`IS Failure or refusal to comply and give satisfactory assurances of future compliance with the requirement of this affirmative action plan shall be proper basis for applying sanctions. Any or all of the following actions may be taken, as appropriate: cancellation, termination or suspension in whole or in part of the contracts a determination of ineligibility or debarment from any further contracts under the CDBG program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurances of future compliance has been received. GRIEVA27CE PROCEDURES Any lower income resident of the project or target area, for himself or hersrlf or as a representative of persons similarly situated, seeking employment or training opportunities with the County, 'Contract Cities', 'Spacial Districts', 'Self Governed - Special Districts', contractors or subcontractors, or any business concern located in, or owned in substantial part by persons residing within project or target area seeking any contract opportunities from the 'County', Contract Cities', 'Special Districts', Self Governed - Special Districts', ' -B 0 ... W "Special Districts ", 05elf Governed - Special Districts*, contractor Cor subcontractor, for itself or as a representative of persons or firms similarly situated, may personally or by an authorized • representative file a grievance alle5;ing noncompliance with Section 3, 24 C °D 135 or obligations undertaken pursuant thereto. If anyone feels that they have a grievance as descr.'.bed above, please contact: COUNTY OF SANBEMMINO Office of Community Development 1111 E. Mill Street - Bldg. 1 San Bernardino, CA 92415 The -County will advise you of the form, place and time to file your 'grievance. Pursuant to 24 CPR 135.85, 24 CFR 135.90, 24 CPR 135.95 C and 24 CFR 135.100. • L /7/20/78/bal erg_ L 0 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA (Old Town) The ne My Incorporated QN of Rancho Qtamonga lies generally out of the Ontario / Upland urban complex whw2h is antra ly located In the o4a gnat •InrYard eras of Southern California, Initial attiement occurred adjacent to the Santa Fe Railroad n a manufacturing / shipping point of the wine indaml• Vineyard and winery employees mldea in primarily Catholic. Spanish • speaking Cuamo.iga in the peak -team prior to World War It. The postwar demands for urban land• opening of more productive vineyards In the north, decline in production due to air pulludon• and war Increasing costs of production have all but terminated Southern California wine producdon, lewim much of Qrcamrga with aging hones, wineries Inc shipping facilities being slowly enveloped Into a vat modem Industrial and residential complex. The Od 71wm residential community remains. consisting mainly of small obsolete single farlulY dwellings w u3,, house mostly older residents without the menu or dedre to move to compete for jobs outside Me ands. Outs It the barrio throughout Rancho Cucamonga, rapid nvdential development 1s occurring. Partly in Issponse to the need for adllate pudic sarvicM Rarmho Cucamonga incrporatcd in December. 1977. MINOkITY GROUPS AND LOWER INCOME PERSONS' •Rehrro AepnRx /er4dmouW clan ••S7.SJ0�EO%SMSA auW+ frump. SEVEN -YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM _— Iro1aes Y.1 (1913,781 16 01 TKaI Ioruund. Yw4 I1W8.791 Y..2 Ywa IL79ir 11!80911 Cava iea Oran 6prWh gloarnaes bar Tnaa ram4la Ianrty owreu! Crwa Tod 21 t307 W Tael Owns Ruhr l T,. iopun+aen BIR3 68wmalea Y. OMsaunp OrareMd Oacwolae inh, rlulrlekp 21 4455 7] n] 9.6 1.478 69.4 78.8 61 TOTAL 4438 1] 47] 96 IA78 69.4 28.8 61 •Rehrro AepnRx /er4dmouW clan ••S7.SJ0�EO%SMSA auW+ frump. SEVEN -YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM _— Iro1aes Y.1 (1913,781 Y OI Tool Iamalr Yw4 I1W8.791 Y..2 Ywa IL79ir 11!80911 ramYa Cava Taut Oran Ultlr Mass of Tnaa ram4la Ianrty owreu! 37.500•• NWwhaW 21 t307 9.8 747 322 9.2 TOTAL 1]72 9.8 16.7 52.2 9.9 •Rehrro AepnRx /er4dmouW clan ••S7.SJ0�EO%SMSA auW+ frump. SEVEN -YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM _— Iro1aes Y.1 (1913,781 Yw7 (1977.10 Yw4 I1W8.791 Y..2 Ywa IL79ir 11!80911 Yw7 Il9p•t31 7•Yw TeW 1 519357 !Y.2 Need 470.192 9722414 222,474 100000 91 ».740 227.740 33.693 33.693 97.394 TOTAL 9121,000 5.192.906 SI$T87 !]3,8,101 of 61,427 31,307429 ❑ PRIOR PROGRAM YEARS 197 66 TRACT: tA•t:lT A.lA City of Rancho Cucamonga Rase .eos; FI © Nnfneernfo0 Factlltt 196 VJ l 61 E • Zo Feelnut ena ��, Arrer "'Xr:;•,.,clai+.CS• `_°a Zi.CT.A ±�`r Rent. µUS ` Y Ai L SF• - 1=+%6%edtt, "V. 14 RR 't YXLo y. i't3 D$� sr= 11-4 Z sth M !.. s.rnarU ln. j �:�? r •S,7a�lli A• v a i < to _ S1•0 N•11 TRACT: tA•t:lT A.lA City of Rancho Cucamonga Rase .eos; FI © Nnfneernfo0 Factlltt 196 VJ l 61 E • M E M O R A N D U M Date: June 28. 1979 To; City Manager and Council From Bill Holley, Director, Comaunity Services Department Re: Cooperation Agreement Between Houe'ng Authority of San Bernardino County and City of Rancho Cucamonga He have explored Rancho Cucamonun'i options reggard1979, with the Authorities, as presented to Council on March 21, following results: pp 1 Formindueuro own Housing Authority uthordt(personnel)actical at this timR, (Ontario after a lengthy 2 Neighboring cities of Ontario and Upland would not e viable partners at this time ( land is eonsiderin - period, signed with County: and Up giving up their Housing Authority in favor of partic pating with County in future years) 3 Signing with County, by process of elimination, is the only • reasonable alternative Briefly summarized, the purpose of the HoLISn Authority n . Nosalrjdof to construct and operate subsidized rental a =tact, the allocation of homes are handled within this operat on these rental unite are heavily competed for by incorporated and Be Then319pavailableeuni tsrarehalready distributeean Rancho dCucamo Cucamonga will receive none Staff Comment and will not giv- HUD reason will satisfy the v:,HUDereas or By entering into tt,1s agreement it a Housing Assistance Program" (tL1P) to question other HUD funded programs SIX pats community Development Block Grant funding in which City is p Staff Recommendation Enter into Housingg Authority agreement vith County and set s. which is required on page 2, item 2 of Council Resolution at if itiwishes minimum acceptable Council may raise this number. If you have any questions ortor to the meeting. please give me a call, BH /mw • 6 ?, .. r M E M O R A N D U M TO: Bill Holley, Director of Community Services FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: June 27, 1979 RE: Cooperation Agreement Between Housing Authority of San Bernardino County and City of Rancho Cucamonga. Please find enclosed herewith the following documents: (1) Copy of 'A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Approving the Application of the Hous- _ Y aS ing Authority of the County cf San Bernardino for Preliminary Loan for Low -Rent Public Housing; Approving the Development, Construction and ownership of Low-Rent Housing Projects of Not ' to Exceed _ Dwelling Units; and Approving the Form of Coop- eration Agreement Between the City 3f Rancho Cucamonga and the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino and Authoriz- ing Its Execution'r and, (2) Copy of Cooperation Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and Housing Authority of San Bernardino County; both of which I have initialled as to approval of form and con- tent. RED:agg Enclosures ,63 0 C, • M E M O R A N D U M Date: June S, 1974rpv'- ti dBt:ti�tt..:v YV To: Sam Crowe From: Bill Holley Subject: San Bernardino County HousinZ Authority Frr..,osed Sam, we have Leon looking into ou•. options regarding Housing Authorities, which seem to be limited to: 1) Participating with County 2 Fomingg our own Authority 3) with an ther city i(such as Ontario or Upland) Option 2 is out, and option 3 seems unlikely at this time By process of elimination, that leaves only the County Do you have any thoughts in this matter? Would you review and co=ent on the attached agreement° and resolution regarding joining the County Housing authority I plan to on going_ Council wit h this June 20 •Shanks BR/mw cc: chrono /memos t 4 ■ M E M O R A N D U M Date: June 5, 1970 a' g �S To: Sam Crows ry`h J11t;ti`:'15.. �v From: Bill Holley rpm � Subject. San Bernardino County Housing Authority Proposed AgrenA 1 � vrat Sam, we have been looking into our options regarding Housing Authorities, which seem to be Limited to: 1) Participating with County 2 Forming our own Authority 3) Joininf5 with another ciri (such as Ontario or Upland) to form an Authority. Option 2 is out, and option 3 seems unlikely at this time. By process Of elimination, tb3t leaves only the County. Do you have any thoughts on this matter? Would you review and co ®ent on the attached agreements and resolution regarding joining the County Housing Authority I plan on going to Council with this June 20. Thanks BH /cri FU ) CC: chrono /memos WHEREAS, Pursuant to Section 15 (7) (b) of the Act, as amended, is is necessary that the local governing body enter into a Cooperation Agreement with the Local Authority providing for local cooperation in connection with such low -rent housing project; and WHERk AS, pursuant to Section 34515 of the Health and Safety Code express authority is given for local governing bodies to enter in agreements with housing authorities providing for local cooperation with respect to low -rent housing projects; and WHEREAS. Pursuant to and in compliance wita the provisions of Section 34518 of the California Health and Safety Code, this governing body did on Naich 7, 1979 , adopt a Resolution authorizing the publication in a newspaper or general circulation on March 13 and of a notice of public hearing to be a on la'-1 c 2-1 -19715 before this governing bodyy for the purpose of giving Zlin�erested— persons an opportunity to be heara as to whether seen Cooperation Agreement should be entered into, and there has been made available one copy of the proposed Cooperation Agreement for inspection by interested persons prior to the mentioned public hearing; and triiEREAS, the notices for a public hearing have been. published as above provided, and this governing body has held a public hearing srarting at the hour of 7 a.m. on the 21 day of March giving all interested persons ai opportunity to ba Beard as to^ vheTr the ggr000sed Cooperation Agreement in the form hereinafter set forth should • be entered into, which said hearing has been concluded with all matters in connection therewith having been fully considered by this body, .1011, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows: 1 There exists in this locality a need for such low -rent housing at rents within the means of low - income families or persons 2 The application of the Local Authority to HUD for a Preliminary Loan in an amount not to exceed (0 of units x $500 - for surveys and planning in connection with low -rent hcus ng pro eccs of not to exceed dwelling units is hereby approv.l 3 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve the development, construction and ownership by the Iw•cal Authority of the project as defined in Paragraph 1(a) of the Cooperation Agreement set forth in Paragraph 4 hereof. 4 The 'rancho Cucamonga Ciry Council, after having held a public hearing and giving all interested persons an opportunity to be heard, hereby determines pursuant to the provisions of the California Housing Cooperation Law (being Chapter 2 of Part 2 of D vision 24 of the California Health and Safety Code), to enter into a Cooperation Agreement in substantially the form hereinafter set forth with the Local Authority The Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino is hereby auth- ® orized and directed Lo execute such Cooperation Agreement in the name and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk is hereby cuthorized and directeL: to affix or impress the official seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga thereon and to attest to same Such Cooperation Agreement shall be in sytsrJartially the form of the agreement attached hereto. -2- 5 This Recolution shall become effective immediately • PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS day of yor o t e t} oc Rancho Cucamonga P.TTEST: 44 .0ty Attomey —Zrity er 0 0 This Agreement entered into this day of , 1979, by and between the Housing Authority of the County of Son Bernardino, (heroin called the "Local Authority') and the City of Rancho Cucamonga , (heroin called the "Municipality "). vitnesseth: In consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1 Whenever used in thin Agreement: (a) The term "Project" shall mesa any low -cost housing hereafter developed as an entity by the Local Authority with financial assistance of the United States of America acting through the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (herein culled the "Government "); excluding, however, any low -rent housing project covered by any contract for loans and annual contributions entered into between the Weal Authority and the Government, or its predecessor agencies, prior to the date of this Agreement. (b) The term Taxing Body" shell mean the State or any political subdi,,tsion or taxing unit thereof in which a Project is situated and which would have authority to assess or levy real or personal • property taxes or to certify such taxes to a taxing body or public officer to be levied for its use and benefit wi b recpeet to a Project if it were not exempt from taxation (c) The term "SI•elter Rent" shall mean the total of all charges to all tenants of a Project for dwelling rents i�d nondvelling rents (excluding all other income cf such Proje a), less the cost to the Local Authority of all dwelling and nondwelling utili- ties (d) The term "Slum" shall mean any area there dwellings predomin- ate which, by reason of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrange- ment or design, lack of ventilation, light or sanitation facilities, or any combination of these factors, are detrimental to safety, health, or morals. 2 The Local Authority shall In coordination wltn the Local Wvern- ing nod v endeavor (a) To secure a contract or contracts with the Government for loans and annual contributions covering one or mote projects comprising a total number of dwelling units of low -ren, housing to be built or rehnbilLtated, not to exceed 5% of the total dwelling units within the ttuntrivallty and (b) To develop and administer such project or projects, each cf which shall be locntad within the corporate limits of the [hmicin•+lity The obligations of the parties hereto shall apply to each such project. W V (a) Under the constitution and statutes of the State of California, • all Projects are exempt it" all real end personal property taxes and special assessments levied or imposed by any Taxing Body. Uith respect to any Project, so long as either (1) such Project is owned by a public body or governmental agency and is used for low -rent housing purposes, nr (it) any contract between the Local Authority and the Government for loans or annual contributions, or both in connection with such Project remains in force and effect, or (111) any bonds Issued in connection with such Project or any =nice due to the Goverment in connection with such Project remain unpaid, whichever period in the longest, the Municipality agrees it will not levy or impose any real or personal property taxes or special assessments upon such Project or upon the Local Authority with respect thereto :luring such period, the Local Authority shall take annual payment, (herein called "Payments in Lieu of Taxes ") in lieu of such taxes and spccinl asses:mentc and in payment for the Public services and facilities furnished from time to time without other cost or charge for or with respect to such Project Each such annual Payment in Lieu of Taxes shall be made at the time when real property taxes on such Project would be paid if it were subject to taxation, and shall be in an amount equal to eitl,ei (1) ten percent (10%) of the Shelter Rent charged by the Local Authority in respect to such Project during the li months' period ending Son" ter before such payment is nude, War (11 ) the amount permitted to be paid by applicable state law in effect on the date such payment is made, whichever amount It be lover The Hunicipality shall distribute the Payments in Lieu of Taxes nmong the Taxing Bodies in the proportion which the real property taxes which would have been paid to each Taxing Body for such year If the Project were not exempt from taxation bears to the total real property taxes which would have been paid to all of the Taxing Bodies for such veer if the Project were not exempt from taxation; Provided, however, that no payment for any year shall be suds to any Taxing Body in excess of the amount of the real property taxes which would have been paid to such Taxing Body for such year If the Project were not exempt from taxation Upon failure of the Local Authority to make any Payment in Lieu of Taxes, no lien against any Project or assets of the Local Authority shall attach, nor shall any interest or penalties accrue or attach on account thereof 6 During the period commencing with the date of the acquisition of any part of the site or situ of any Project and continuing so long as either (t) such Projer, is owned by a public body or governmental agency and is used for low -rent housinrt purposes, or (11) any contract between Llo Local Authority and the Government for loans or annual contributions, or both, in connection With such Project retains in 40 force and effect, or (iii) any bonds issued in connection with such Project or any monies due to the Government in connection • with such Project remin unpaid, whichrver period In the longest, the Municipality without cost or charge to the Local Authority or the tenants of such Project (other than the Payments in Lieu of Taxes) shall: (a) furnish or cause to be furnished to the Local Authority and the tenants of such Project public services and facilities of the same character and to the same extent as are furnished from time to time without rest or charge to other dwellings and Inhabitants Ln the Municipality; (b) Vacate such streets, roads, and alleys within the area of such Project no may be necessary in the development thereof; and convey without charge to the Local Authority such interest as the Municipality my have in such vacated areas; and, in so far as it is lawfully able to do so without cost or expense to the Local Authority or to the Municipality, cause to be removed from such vacated areas, in so far as it my be necessary, all public or private utility lines and equipment; (c) In so far as the Municipality my lawfully do so, (f) grant such deviations from the building coda of the • Municipality as are reasonable and necessary to promote economy and efficiency in the development and adminio- tretion of such Pruject, and at the same time sareguard health and safety, and (11) mke such changes in any zoning of the site and surrounding territory of such Project as are reasonable and necessary for the develop- ment and protection of such Project and the surrounding territory; (d) Accept grants of easements necessary for the develop- ment of such Project; and (c) Cooperate with the Local Authority by such other lawful action or ways as the Municipality and the Local Authority may find necessary in connection with the development and administration of such project S In respect to my Project the Municipality further agrees that within a reasonalbe time after receipt of a written request therefor from the Local Authority: (a) It will accept the dedication of all interior streets, roads, alleys, and adjacent sldewjlks within the area of such Project, together with all storm and sanitary sever aiins in such dedicated areas, after the local Authority, at its own expense, has completed the priding, improve- ment, paving, and installation thereof in accordance with specifications acceptable to the Municlpality; (b) It will accept necessary dedication of land for, and will grado, improve, pave, and provide sidevalks for, all street■ bounding such Project we necessary to provide adequate access thereto (in consideration whereof the Local Authority shall pay to the Municipality such amount as would be assessed against the Project Site for such work if such site were privately owned); and (c) It will pravlde, or cause to be provided, water ruins, and store and sanitary sever mains, leading to such Project and serving the bounding streets thereof (in consideration whereof the Deal Author.ty shall pay to the Municipality such amvuat as would be assessed against the Project Site for such work if such site were privately owned). If by reason of the Municipality's failure or refusal to furnish or cause to be furnished any public services or facilities which it has agreed hereunder tc furnish or to cause to be furnished to the Local Authority 0 to the tenants of any Project, the Local Authority incurs any expense to obtain such services or facilities then the Local Authority may deduct the amount of such expense item any ray,ents it Lieu of Taxes due or to become due to the Municipality in respect to any Project or any other low-rent housing projects owned or operated by the Local Authority No Cooperation Agreement heretofore entered into between the Municipality and the Local Authority shall be construed to apply to any Project covf.,d by this agreement. No member of t:ie governing body of the Municipality or any other public official of the Municipality who exercises any responlibilittea or functions w fell respect to any Project during his tenure or for one year thereaf'er shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in any Project contracts any property included or planned to be Included in any project, y in connection with such Projects or property If any such governing body member or such ether public official of the Municipality involuntarily or had acquired prior to the beginning of his tenure any such interest, ne shall Immediately disclose such interest to the Local Authority. So long as any contract between the Local Authority and t^^ Covermznt for loans (including prellainary loans) or annual contributions, or both, in eom•cction with any Project remains in force and effect, or so long as any bond, issued in connection with any t' :oject or any sOries due to the Government in connection with any Project remain unpaid, this Agreement shall not be nbrnrated, changed, or modified without the consent of the Government. The privileges and obligations of the Municipality hereunder ,hall remain in fullforce and effect with respect to each Project so long as the beneficial title to suet, Prnjcct is hold by the Local Authority or by nny other public body or governmental agency, including ttm ..a- 'rnment, authorized by law to cugnge in the development or adminsitration of low -rent housing projects. If at any time Lhe beneficial title to or possession oft any Project is held by such other public body or governmental agency, including the Government, .7/ • • the provisions hereof shall insure to the benefit of and ney be enforced by, such other public body or governmental agency, Jr ludinC the Government IN WITNESS RIIERCOF, the Hunicipality and the Local Authority have respectively signed this Agreement and caused their scale to be affixed and attested as of the day and year first above written. Attest: Attest: City Clerk Secretary i City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Mayor My Attomey t 110USING AUTIIOCI Y OF THE COUNTY OF SAN B.RNARDINO By: Chairman San Bernardino County Office of Community Development Informational Sheet PUBLIC HOUSING COOPERATION AGREEMENT BACKGROUND In early January the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued an advertisement indicating that funding was available for the construction of 319 two bedroom publically owned housing units in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties. Theae units once construct- ed would be owned, maintained, and operated by the local Housing Authority and leased to lower income households. The San Bernardino County Housing Authority has filed an application for the currently available units which proposes construction on scattered sites within the incorporated and unincorporated portions of the County It is estimated that 8 -10 units will be constructed on each site. To date specific sites have not been proposed The site selection process will be completed in cooperation with City staff. COOPERATION AGREEMENT Prior to HUD approval of the current application, Cooperation Agree- ments must be executed between the Housing Authority and all local governmental Jurisdictions ubere potential housing sites are located. In general, the Cooperation Agreement indicates the City's support for public housing development. It should be noted that the Agree - mont covers not only the currant application, but also would apply to future public housing construction funds made available through HUD. APPROVAL OF SELECTED SITES Once actual sites are selected, City Council approval in the form of a public hearing will be required This will insure that each proposed site is acceptable for public housing development dal/3/2/79 '73 0 40 F � �.J REMIIREMENTS RELATING TO SECTIONS • A ASSI37'ED NOUS O PROPOSALS LOCAL REVIEW 1 New construction or substantial rehabilitation proposals for Section 8 or other federally assisted housing programs must be submitted to HUD, FMHA or CHFA for review and approval by both the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors and the City Council in the participating cities For Section 8 proposals, the completed 213 form should be submitted fnr review Each proposal will be ranked in order to select these which best meet th•e Urban County's goals and standards Each proposal shall be assigned numerical ratings on the basis of its merits relative to other proposals in its group All proposals with a "Superior" ranking overall will be consistent with this HAP The highest ranking proposals totalling the amount of funding available in a given advertising or funding cycle will be consistent with this HAP All lower ranking proposals shall be inconsistent with this HAP Regardless of other proposals received say proposal ranked as "Unacceptable" overall will be inconsistent with this HAP Proposals shall be ranked with respect to the fo owing sets of criteria a Site and neighborhood • b Design and concept c Owner /sponsor experience d Management capability e Equal opportunity f Conformance to local plans g Extent of use of local subcontractors (See attached review checklist) B SELECTION OF TENANTS 1 All private parties having a contract directly with HUD for new construction or substantial rehabilitation under Section 8 will be required to give first priority to displaced persons and second priority, during the first 120 days of tinting, to eligible applicants on the San Bernardino County Housing Authority waiting lists 2 Any qualified applicant on the County Housing Authority waiting list who is rejected for occupancy under provision B 1 may appeal to HUD unless ail units of the appropriate size for which that applicant might qualify have been rented 3 Landlords /owners and their managers will advertise in minority areas and will conform to all equal opportunity laws when selecting tenants 4 Land:ord /owners and their mtnagers will not discriminate with regard ® to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, cultural economic, or other social factors which place the individual to a disadvantaged position 134 / 4 HOUSING PROPOSAL REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS: Check all applicable boxes and provide all information requested even if the proposal is found to be unacceptable on the basis of any single item or factor A. name ,�- .._... ' --- ii availaole) no a SITE AND NEIGHBORHOOD CRITERIA (This section stay be deleted if all proposals in group to be compared are for the same site, based upon a pre -site approval request ) 1 In relation to any adverse environmental conditions, natural or manmade (areas which serve natural ecological functions -- flood plains, wetlands, etc ), the site is: _ Superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The site is in oce of the priority areas for new construction/ substantial rehabilitation indicated on Table IV yes (5) _ no (0) 3 The site's accessibility to public utilities (water and sewer service to the site should be assessed for both •ccessiblility and capacity to serve the development) is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 4 The site's accessibility to employment opportunities is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 5 The site's accessibility to transportation service is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 136 �,6 7j 11 n �.I C. MANAGEMENT 1 The County of San Bernardino requires that HUD administer contracts with private parties for new construction or rehabilitation to assure compliance with the established rules and requirements of the law and of this plan. 2 Whenever possible, HUD should contract with the San Bernardino County Housing Authority to administer portions of the contract related to certificatioe of income, etc., to provide more substantial control 3 Management practices must protect the anonymity of Section 8 part - cipants D DESIGN All proposals for development of family had large family units containing 50 units or less on a single site will be given favorable consideration during the 113 Review Process Projects proposing a greater number of units per site will generally be considered inconsistent with the Housing Assistance Plan. Developers will be encouraged to submit proposals .filch incopoi :te A min of assisted and market rate units within a given development E OTHER I The County of San Bernardino and Participating cities are willing to accept "fair share" of assisted housing as determined by the Areawide Hcusing Opportunity Plan r 138 �(/ 3. The project's special amenities and unusual features are: superior (5) _ good (3) • _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 4. The project contains a mix of subsidized and non - subsidized units or is part of a larger mixed development: yes (5) _ no (0) S. The assisted part of the development contains 30 or fever units: _ yes (5) _ no (0) 6 If the project contains units for the elderly or handicapped, the project conforms to design standards devised to serve the elderly more efficiently yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SUIMARY OF DESIGN RATING (divide total points by 6) IN RELATION TO OTHER PROPOSALS, THE DESIGN CONCEPT IS: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) • C 01.NER aPERIE.NCE CRITERIA 1. The developer, builder and /or owner's experience in the construction for the structural type proposed is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ lair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2. The developer, builder and /or owner have acceptable experience in the development and /or construction of housing or in related fields. yes (5) _ no (0) 3 The developer, builder /owner's experience in the development/con- $truction of projects at a scale comparable to that of the proposed project is: superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SL ^DARY OF NM E7u ERIE.YCE RATING (divide total paints by 3) THE ABILITY OF THE DEVELOPER, BUILDER /OFNER AS DEMONSTRATED BY FAST PERFORMANCE IS: superior (5) _ good (3) • _ fair (I) _ unacceptable (0) 138 7/7 6 The site's accessibility to residential services (schools -- consider impaction and saturation ^t well as access -- parks, commercial and retail shopping, day care facilities, recreational and cultural oppor- tunities, municipal services: Fire, police, and health facilities) is: superior (5) _ good (3) —_ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 7 Streets are available to service the site or provisions for public tm- provements are incorporated within the proposal y superior (5) _ good (3) r _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) a The site's potential to promote greater choice of housing opportunities and avoid undue conceaLration of assisted households in areas containiog a high proportion of low income persons is: superior (5) _ good (3) —_ fair (1) _ unaccrptable (0) 9 In relation to required relocation assistance, the proposal is: superior (5) _ good (3) —_ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 10 The project's consistency with local plans and plans of affected public agencies is: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SUMMARY OF STTE A.N'D NEIGHBOR' RATING (divide total points received by 10) IN RELATI -:: TO OTHER rn,.10SAIS, THE SUITABILITY OF THE SITE FOR SUBSIDIZED HOUSING IS: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) B JESIGN CONCEPT CRITERIA 1 The land use planning and treatment of the proposed site based on local standards are: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The building layout and unit plans are: ® _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) � 777 r_ TOTAL SE"TION POINTS: • SUMARY OF EQUAL OPPO2TUNITY REQUIREMMS (divide total points by 2; THE POTENTIAL OF THE PROPOSAL FOR ACHIEVING EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ORJECTIVCS RELATIVE TO OTHER PROPOSALS IS: superior (5) _ goon t3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) F CONSISTENCY WITH CITY PLANS 1 The proposal is for the type of construction given priority in the current year goals yes (5) _ no (0) 2 The proposal is for "substantial rehabilitation" yes (5) _ no (0) 3 The proposal conforms to all applicable local plans and requirement; _ yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: SU2wy CF CONSISTENCY MITH CITY PLAYS (divide total points by 3) THE PROPOSAL'S CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL PLANS IS: superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) C. USE OF LOCAL CONTRACTORS I The sponsor /developer agrees to use local subcontrr •tors for all construction work. yes (20) for some jobs (5) not villing to provide vritteo assurance (0) Additional comments if appropriate OVERALL PROPOSAL POINTS: SU.TL%RY RATING _ auperior (5) _ good (3) fair (3) _ unacceptaLle (0) 0 140 -� F D ILLYAGE.MENT CAPABILITY CRITERIA Is The necessary experience and /or qualifications of the owner to carry out project maaagement ani maintenaace activities are: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) OR lb If the owne= proposes to contract with a management agent tw carry out management and maintenance responsibilities, such agent has the neces- sary experience or qualifications to carr," out such responsiblities _ superior (5) _ good (3) _ fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 2 The proposal's conformance to the regulations regarding owner respon- sibilities for a management and a maintenance plan and utilities schedule is: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) 3 priority. during give e first 120rdays« t displaced persons of re tig,, to eligible applicants Mon the San Bernardino County Rousing Authority waiting lists _ yes (5) _ no (0) 4 The project will be contracted with the County Housing Authority to administer portions of the contract related to certifications of in- come, etc yes (5) _ no (0) TOTAL SECTION POINTS: S0.M.MARY OF IIANAGEME.YT RASING (divide total points by 4) IN RELATION f0 OTHER PROPOSALS, THE MANAGEMENT CAPABILITY IS: _ superior (5) _ good (3) fair (1) _ unacceptable (0) E EQUAL OPPORTUN.TY REQUIRME. IS I The owner /builder /developer is a signator to Areawide Affirmative Fair and Equal Housing Plans yes (5) — no (0) 2 The project will be advertised in minority areas yes (5) _ no (0) 139 qD I � r 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUOlIr—MO_N STATE OF CALIFOR \I\ as counrY of SAN Reen►Rpin,, nrn CR nrnv 1• do hrreby certify that I am the Legal Advertising clerk of THE DAILY 7.0•PORT a daily new Gaper of general circulation. Published In the City of Ontario. (bun y and State arore idt and that the attached ad%vrtlsemenl of '1 ^T•^ CF 11!1 –LTC "C \ ^i'1^ U•r on/(nogrrl _— Cnn nrrt•171 n't A0nrrV1IIT 'r ,rr•' Tllr CITY n; •.1gr•In C "rN•n•Ir1 VM T'•f- "Mile ^'n AI �I. •... –v nF Till, CnW4Tv nr cA'r orrvjA^n1•(n was published in sold newspaper on- r1n•' Orly to wit `Ir'r1 ?a,l ^en I certify under peralty of Perjury that the foregoing Is true and correct EA 0 e', I (Signature, Dated at Ontario. California lif1• r<•enth tffo ia this day of IS _ _,=4. —=�= ~-:'-`-'°�"':.• ter± -+-„� -^: �- .>:�a':x�'_srr COVnIr of smn bernordmo `VIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY :ICE OF COtt.IUNITY DEVELOPMENT loco) O•r.nv 1 Ean M-a SuM • San Bem+rdine, CA 92415 • 01413312145 1% February 12, 1979 Hr auren Wasserman. City Manager Box 793 - 0340 Basline Av. - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 Dear Hr Wasserman: The Office of Comirunity Development would like to schedule two agenda dates before your City Council to discuss a proposed Cooperation Agreement between the City and the County Housing Authority In a Urban rG ve oment,9319inellipublic. housing buy itsewere allocated touthe9 and Riverside - San Bernardino Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SHSA) • The Hovsigg Authority of San Bernardino County is currently preparing an opclicatloa for approximately 155 of these units to be located on scattered sites tnroughout the County. To date, specific sites have not bean selected. As part of the formal application, Cooperation Agreements must be negotiated hmtw ^en the 'lousing Authority and all local governmental jurisdictions where all CCorimnii; ysDevelopmenedcooperatingicities �9as will Supervisors ansample agrearent, resolution ffor pubichearf g, etc. Sincec'here areltis'eg� constraints involved in the submittal of a formal application to HUD, the Office of Cerrlunity Development requests your assistance in schedulino time or Lhe City Council ar,^_nda to authorize and conduct a public hearino in reg3rJ to be- requiredU aOnecdate toi authorize bnotice ofhat public ahearing, and lthe t l second date. at least tiro weeks later, to hold the actual hearing E Page 1 KN M- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORA14DUM DATE: July S. 1979 To: City Council d City Manager FROMI Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: GRANT FUNDING FOR STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION - U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION GRANT AND LOAM PROGRAM For the past few months, the Engineering Division has been discussing with Chino Basin Water Conservation District, the Flood Control District and L. D. King Engineering, the potential for obtaining grant and loan funds from the Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of storm drains throughout the West Valley area and within the City of Rancho Cucamonga The overall pro- gram will involve construction of 19 million dollars of storm drains in- cluding 5 million in our City Drains selected for funding are required to contribute to storm water re- charge and terminate at recharge basins Included are the Beryl -Red Hill storm drain, the Eighth Street and Arrow Route drains in the industrial area These drains are 4, 7 and R on the City's current priority funding list (See attached nap.) These projects are proposed for funding under the Bureau of Reclamation "Loans Under the Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956•. The program is part grant part loan, depending on formula evaluation developed through the application process. Best guess is 50% grant and 505 loan could be attained for this project. Loans are for 40 years or less at about 61 interest Project approval is based on qualiflying for a threshold benefit as determined by *he Bureau and The Corps of Engineers Preliminary discussion have been held with the Bureau of Reclamation by Chino Basin Water Conservation District and L D. King Indication from these meetings seem positive and the Bureau has encouraged the agencies to proceed to develop a Notice of Intent to apply for grant and loan funds As described in the attached letter from Mr. Ernest Rowley, Secretary - Manager of the Conservation District, the next step in the Process invol%es the comittment of $2,000 by each City interested in the program to pay tha consultant for preparation of the Notice of Intent These funds will be supplemented with $6,000 from the Conservation District. At this time, it appears that if sufficient interest is demonstrated on the part of participating cities, that the Flood Control District will act as lead agency for purposes of grant administration through the initial stages. At completion of ti,- Notice of Intent review, the Bureau will make findings and and invite an application ?q GRANT FUNDING FOR STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION July 5, 1979 Page 2 • At that time, the precise project will be known and grant -loan proportions determined. The citiei will then be faced with the following issues: 1. Construction scheduling 2. Proportionate share of funding for application processes 3. Contractural cost arrangemenn tstbetween each and agencyconstruction Flood Control District 4. Funds committmx?nt for 1 to payback S. Legal commitments for funds under Proposition 13 E. Whether the program would be of overall benefit to the City CONCLUSION The Engineering Division has worked closely with all the involved agencies on _ this project and feel that the proposed Investment in relation to potential gain is sufficient to warrant a comaittment on the part of the City of S2,000 to further explore the project. There are questions remaining as to the ap- plicability of the funding program t ot he proposed project and inter- agency coordination will be difficult if a grant Is obtained. The only method of answering many of these questions is to take the first step to obtain a better assessment On the issue of Inter- agency coordination, It should be Pointed out that the City cannot legally apply for this program by itself Federal and State law require a reVyonal "subdivision of the State" to make application For this reason, it 1s proposed that Flood Control District will act rs lead agency. At this time, the District has not fully consented to act in the role of lead agency and has requested that the cities review the program to obtain Council approval of the $2,000 allocation At the time each agency has com- mitted, the District and Board of Supervisors will review the prograt, and prepare the necessary agreements To date, none of the cities has committed for funding. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council. approve participation in the proposed grant and applyODDDisbrsement0ofi saidefudsrto the be approved by the City Council at time of execution of agreements with the County Flood Control District Respectfully su I tttte/edd, ` City Engineer LH:deb 96 U At, I H7 O dVtl �` C CL + 'H7 dytl `p I , t , • ,.� / Q q • tD rl o lb rry-�e� I ul m A O 46 ,ice � I •r � ii, i mil' i m � L , � � � _. SnI rs i os ' fZ J0 a et x !Z•JO SZ JO n• t� N N �� I �A aa■ 0 a, I �• o &.V �v33r�,� r�3a �9ZJ0 tun t + I• 7_ t - i a7; '•I i I 1,b • M o I A 1109�' tj ED it L � I .yam I • +T 1 I b�A ��� •` UQp = \•. ±. : >'�� �a r•..., ,L ••n r, �� I . \ tai` j' 1 AN S Giv CCU _ \ w � N QL • 0 0 0 0 o i t o 7r bb 1,' 1b rrAl J tib�• zt a. �rO<f : .D �7 r •p 'tt .y � � ,per, h ♦',� 1 2 � � � Q �r L ) AC �' i ID f,r t• • da 68 b G 9� x f f, �.•, .v ` \per m � N w .n •1 b i+ n i CO c Z a � V • fi V„ 'a' V� V F C. i. O .f • 1F.:• it o- R t t 6¢ ` _ \ eQ o: ,ICI f ie ^ iss p •f,� �j,`•• trf Q tn .4 )^ j a qN b zt I l ^ t V • '�� {. :'"' H44 0 0 ;❑ STORII DRAln PRIORITIES `I� Estimated Cost 1 Storm Drain Master Plan Update Phased) S 75,000 2 Day - Etiwanda - San Sevafne System 25,000 3. Carnelian Channel 500,000 4 Red 9111 - Beryl Storm Brain - project 2a -2b 1.600.000 5 6 19th Street Storm Brafn - Project 46 Baseline Storm Drain - Projec• 4c 500,000 11000.000 7 8th Street Storm Drain - Project 5d 1,500,000. _ B. Heliman Avenue Storm Drain - Project 6a 11250.000 9 Arrow Route Storm Drain - Project 5c 1,300,000 10 Foothill -Turner Storm Drain - Project 5e 1,000,000 TOTAL S 9,750,000 Funding for each project will be phased to provide optimum construction scheduling and potential for capture of grant funding `I� P6ELIMINARY DRAFT VIM To Nest End Directors of Public Works /City Engineers SUBJECT: U Stores Protection d andaLoan R ion Project Program Ladies and Gentlemen: Daring the past few weeks, we have discussed a potential project that would utilize a Bureau Grant .nd Loan Program to construct storm drains and storn flow reclamation facsll -ies I wish to inform you of my laest actiities indpursuingethis project. ztatelcent Our review of grant and loan procedures with Bureau staff indicates the program will involve a substantial amount of "red tape” The Corps of Engineers will review flood proUwtion cost benefits and several depart- ments of the Bureau will have application review input It occurred to US that these processing issues might better be coordinated by a local agency that has a number of experienced staff members. We then decided to discuss the program with Supervisors Townsend and McElwain and San F.ernardir.o County Flood Control District staf' District staff is ene t ine n dealing with tthe facoliand several of the proposed storm drains i tie raet with the Supervisors and Mr k`ino DiPietro. Flood Control Engineer. on June 12th It was agreed that Cit1 interests should be firmed and atBa o Flood C rvisers cntff report %o datep prepared and presented to the culec"Ra tnc rv�.�.Y e"...... ro+ . YA.OYOC YYI.I. �f✓�/�wyy./� C El WC D :W .0 .Ya „[.. NVWYW�/vW N \� .� MAL: V9LDt u�r.. e.r[.ot C...e ...nrow DISTRICT CHINO BASIN WATER CONSERVATION 4594 Son Bernardino StnYt • Afontalair. Cablornta 91763 P. 0. Box 1177 • Phone 714 • 626.7711 ora¢cea Yl .ala YYtIt11 ... MC MI.ont.8 �ovu o .AOO[.. 9 ...rn. June 27. 1979 89C oisTnicr covwsM L A ot.c.uc P6ELIMINARY DRAFT VIM To Nest End Directors of Public Works /City Engineers SUBJECT: U Stores Protection d andaLoan R ion Project Program Ladies and Gentlemen: Daring the past few weeks, we have discussed a potential project that would utilize a Bureau Grant .nd Loan Program to construct storm drains and storn flow reclamation facsll -ies I wish to inform you of my laest actiities indpursuingethis project. ztatelcent Our review of grant and loan procedures with Bureau staff indicates the program will involve a substantial amount of "red tape” The Corps of Engineers will review flood proUwtion cost benefits and several depart- ments of the Bureau will have application review input It occurred to US that these processing issues might better be coordinated by a local agency that has a number of experienced staff members. We then decided to discuss the program with Supervisors Townsend and McElwain and San F.ernardir.o County Flood Control District staf' District staff is ene t ine n dealing with tthe facoliand several of the proposed storm drains i tie raet with the Supervisors and Mr k`ino DiPietro. Flood Control Engineer. on June 12th It was agreed that Cit1 interests should be firmed and atBa o Flood C rvisers cntff report %o datep prepared and presented to the June 27, 1979 Page two The suggested next step would be for each interested City to commit to fund S2.000 and to request that. the Flood Control District fia�� ice of intent to apply with the Bureau. The Cities' money. together 56.000 from the Conrvation District, would be used to refine the notice presently drafted, se make additional preliminary engi se neering evaluaticns of quantities of storm flow to to reclaimed, and to complete a list Of potential projects within each City's Jurisdiction. in addition, the funds �cmmitted now would be used to Day the 51,000 Eureau filing fee and to obtain a prelimi°ary Bond Council opinion of the loan tontract in tight of Proposition 13. Each City would select projects in its area that they feel ccafortable in pursuing, assuming a future loan repayment responsibility. L. D. King, inc., staff will assist in ctmpllifor the Bureaulist Fundin4 potential Projects ?°r and draft the notice of used intent apply staft in a presenUtfoa to Hatton would then be used by Flood the Board of Supervisors. Mr Frank Coony attended the meeting on June 12th. He indicated that mitt is probable that EDA study funds will be available to fund the front work leading to a loan -grant commitment from Sthe BBureeau peoplestrdtcated attempting to bugget 5200,000 for this purpo the�ecouldnadvance funds byoththi£DA program. to sat isfy cash flow rEgvirezents if • it is requested that you reviesthetousnbyaearlpgram with please City Councils and repo your if I can assist in further describing the D'Ogrn or if I can help in any presentations Sincerely. � ERNNENST —E RROWLLEEY Secretary - Manager CJF: sw DISTRIBUTION• Supervisor Townsend Supervisor McElwain Carl Sawtell, City of Montclair Rosalind Daniels. City of Ontario Fred City City ofUD Upland Pay Wellington. City of Chino Dino DiPietro. San D Bernardino County t Flood Control Fvank Coony. Economic aDevelopment yAgency ® .arl Freeman, L. D King, Inc yo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM niA MEHORAIIOUM DATE: July S. 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Bill Holley, Director of Cocmnity Services SWECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS Attached for Council rcview is preliminary information developed for the proposed formation of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Lighting District No. 1. Attached are the list of the tracts to be included, the procedures for establishing the District under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, preliminary cost data for maintenance of the District and pertinent correspondence with the Planning Commission and Advisory Committees The tracts to be included in these Districts were chosen because they have not yet left the control of the developer and remain as one ownership This fact will facilitate the formation process • The attached mew on cost describes those methods of cost distribution throughout the District and gives samples of typical costs under each option. This information was reviewed by the Citizen's Advisory Committees, who reco=ended a two phased approach. The Committees were strongly in favor of developing a parkway maintenance program, but felt that the program should be Citywide with approval of the taxing authority by ballot measure. Prior to this action, the combined maintenance district for the reco,.mended tracts was approved. This is the Plan 2 option described in the attached mm from Mr. Holley The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its June 13, 1979 meeting and requested the additional information provided in the attached June 27 meco. The Commission shared the concern of the Advisory Committees and supported a Citywide maintenance concept. The Planning Commission will again review this matter at its July 2 meeting and should have a recommendation for Council at the time of the Council meeting ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVE A great deal of concern has been voiced throughout the Community on the .fate of parkway maintenance To date, the City has not been in a position tc pro- vide any maintenance on either improved or unimproved parkway areas The City Council through this years budget has committed substantial resources to deal with this problem. 1? LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS July 5, 1979 • Page 2 The magnitude of this cormittment will have to be increased as the mileage of maintained streetscape increases with development In addition. Special Doulevarl treatments will involve med an island landscaping and additional maintenance burdens The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway maintenance. 1 General Funds 2 Establishment of Maintenance Districts through development and annexation. 3. Development of Citywide tax for maintenance of parkways - requires election 4 Do not maintain landscaped parkways At the current time, arterial landscaping has been required of all tract development With the abolishment of Improvement Zone A and Street Lighting District no 1, no means exists to maintain these improvements. The proposed District would replace these mechanism and allow improvennts to be self supporting As the City grows, the Districts will also grow and with other annexations a Citywide District will hopefully be attained. It is the staff recommendation that the City not approach a Citywide program • until such time as sufficient planning and maintenace experience has been developed to demonstrate the total benefit to the general public. The will allow for and provide parkway environment. RECOtIMENDATI0t1 It is recommended that the City Council instruct staff to begin proceedings for the formation of Landscape and Lighting District No. 1. These districts to encompass the tracts identified in the attached list with cost distributions on a per lot basis for the full district for landscaping and cost distributions on lot basis per tract for lighting. n u l o1 LANDSFO ;UiATIIONTDISTRICT PROCEDURES Landscape and Lighting Act of 172 1 Determination of Need for a District The distriictsnon tentative tractsathat havelbackup andeside -an otsrtoatheeiperie phery of the tract. 2. Notifica�f Property Owners All effective property owners will be notified of the Council hearing and in- tention to form the district. 3. preparation of the Resolution of Intention The Department will prepare a Resolution of Intention for City Council approval 4 Preparation of District HaD District. Division shall be assessed, and the arelationshipeof boundaries h final tract • to the overall street pattern. s. Adoption of the Resolution of Intention g time and The City Council will adopt the Resolution of Intention. set tin a ingcprotest mustgbezetsataleastt10hdayssafter The I Res Intention. Intention. 6. Posting Notice of Improvement The Engineering Division 'rill prepare a Notice of I mprovement. The Engineer- ing Division will Pest this notice at intervals of not more than 300 feet along all streets within the proposed district (At leftortto the tie sof 5t be posted ) The posting must occur at least ten days p the hearing o. protests 7 Publicat_ ion_ Of Roltce of i —mt The City Clerk will publish the Notice of improvement notice the Ontario pub pally Report and will obtain proof of publication The notice must be ote published once. at least ten days prior to the time and date for hearing protest a. flailing Notice of Improvement ® ten days will prior mail notices to all property owners within the District 1'3 9. Cost Estimate The Community Services Department will make an estimate of costs for the District, including maintenance, water, administration and vandalism. 10. Engineer's Report The Engineering Division will prepare a report showing: a. Plans and specifications of the maintenancc b. An estimate of the cost of maintenance (same as (a) above) c A diagram of the assessment district d An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance 1 Protests The City Clerk will receive protests and forward them to the Community Development Department. The Department will prepare resolutions over- ruling the written protests. 12 Resolution Ordering the Formation The Community Development Department will prepare a resolution ordering the formation of the District. A report discussing the District and pro- test will be prepared at this time. • 13 Agenda for Hearing Protest -he City Clerk will prepare an agenda for all protests received and wil. late on the agenda that protests may be received up to the hour of the meeting and that those protests received after the preparation of the agenda shall be hearo in the order of submission. 14 Hearing and Protests The City Council will hold a hearing of objections. The hearing will pro- ceed in accordance with the agenda. 15. Filing the Resolution the City Clerk will file a certified copy of the resolution ordering forma- tion of the Maintenance District In the Office of the County Assessor. 16. Tax Pate The tax ra'e shall be determined by the Department of Finance 17 Adoption of Tax Rate The City Council will adopt a budget and tax rate for the 'Maintenance District. 18 Submission of Tax Rate The Finance Department will submit tax rate to the County Tax Collector no later than August 15 of the budget year. The Tax Collector prefers the tax rate to be submitted in July. /1 , / M) STREET LENGTH SQUARE FEET • Tract 9351 - -Ark III Hanes, Inc. Sapphire 565 x 1011 5,933 63 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tract 9225 - Lesny Development Company 69 Lots 447 South Fairfax Avenue Carnelian 673 x 5 3,365 Los Angeles, CA 90036 Tract 9306 - Halton Construction Corporatimi Archibald 1307 x 1311 17,645 43 Lots 511 Hest Citrus Edge P. 0. Box 775 Glendora, CA 91740 Tract 9269 - Mark III Hares, Inc. Nilson 1379 x 1111 15,859 53 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Archibald 971 x 1311 13,109 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tract 9268 - Ila•k III Hanes, Inc Archibald 721 x 1311 9,734 53 Lots %.450 Redhill Avenue Amethyst 810 x 1011 8,505 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 - Tract 9267 - Mark iII Homes. Inc. Archibald 826 x 1311 11,151 28 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 • Tract 9444 - Hark III Homes, Inc 20 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Costa Hera, CA 92626 Tract 9445 - lark III Homes, Inc. Archibald 2140 x 12 25,680 61 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue Wilson 655 x 10 6,650 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Tract 9440 - Chevron Construction Hermosa 1138 x 10 11,380 45 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90403 Tract 9423 - Coral Investor.nt, Inc. 23 Lots 540 South Pasadena Avenue Glendora, CA 91740 Tract 9434 - Chevron Construction 19th Street 633 x 5 3,015 32 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90703 Tract 9430 - R. L Seivers 6 Sons Inc Wilson 1160 x 11 12,760 29 Lots 6481 Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 8 Haven 617 x 10 4,420 Buena Park, CA 90620 M) 0 RO STREET LENGTH SQUARE FEET Tract 9436 - Chevron , strvction Ilalnut 733 x 10 7.330 27 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Haven 442 x 10 4,420 • Santa tionica, CA 90403 Tract 9437 - Chevron Construction Walnut 1310 x 10 1:,100 28 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa 11014ca, CA 90403 Tract 9454 - Lewis Homes of California Haven 514 x 12 6,165 59 Lots 1156 North Mountain Avenue P 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Tract 9387 - The Jones Company Hermosa 110 x 5 550 56 Lots 10945 South Street P 0. Box 1178 Cerritos, CA 90701 Tract 9637 - Chevron Construction 31 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90403 Tract 9638 - Chevron Construction Archibald 827 a 5 4,175 25 Lots 2120 Wilshire 9ortevard Santa Itonica, CA 90403 Tract 9F57 - Travis L Nanning Hermosa 494 r 10 4,940 33 Lots 2110 Hacienda Boulevard • Hacienda Heights, CA 91745 Tract. 9402 - Olympus Pacific Corooration Lemon 917 x 511 5,374 46 Lots 2110 East Katella Avenue Anaheim, CA 92803 Tract 9403 - Olympus Pacific Corporation 43 Lots 2110 East Katella Avenue Anaheim, CA 92803 Tract 9480 - Kaufman d Broad 4omes, Inc. Baseline 430 w 15 6,450 54 Lots 18902 Bardeen Hay Irvine, CA 92715 Tract 9472 - Boulevard 0evelo,xment 19th Street 528 x 6 3,167 60 Lots 778 South Hain Street, Suite 106 Oranne, CA 92688 0 RO M E M O R A N D U M Date: I•lay 11, 1979 'in: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Frum: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Landscape Maintenance District No 1 Find attached cost information, based on current City of Ontario figures, relating to landscape maintenance districts. District o erationa cost i'• cr square cot, per year $0 040 a) lister 0 015 b) Vandalism and repair 0 028 c) Equipment 00_22883 d) Labor 2) Other 39 60 EL) Electrical, per meter, p er year 168 00 b) inspections, per tract, per year Methods of assessing cost ere are c ree as .c ways of funding a Maintenance District, • such as we propose: 1) Each tract is a district; 2) The tracts C the are arofdthe same district; and An examination of the a3sessment levied against each homeowner and weir using "plan 1" in sample tracts 9351, 9269, and 9387, g the projected cost figures above, yields the following: 48* 9351 per home, per year , 202 32* 9259 per home per year 13 54* 9387 per home, per year Uain "pplan 2" the homeowner ir, Maintenance District No 1 ga25 cost of costa to each iwuldsbeict ul with the acts in No $75 37 per year Plan three, while the correct solution (1 conndnfurchehold the minority view) is not politically feasible• a exploration into it will not be made at this time *The cost assumes that only one electrical meter per tract ® ie used, and this is not generally the case in larger develop- ments. Lloyd, we obviously have a serious problem :he cost to each • homeowner is too high under "plan 2' and financially out of the question in several inatancee using "plan 1" We are going to have to address cost reduction methods through "hardscaping some existing areas, utilii:ing beautification fees, and better control of "financially excessive greenery" imposed in planning requirements We must move quickly on this and get a policy set. �_n cc: Lauren Wasserman sg u n r � l.J CiTY OF RANCHO C'UCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FROM Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Bill Holley, Dimctor of C•m unity Services SUBJECT LANDSCAPE MAMTENANCE DISTRICTS At it's June 13, 1979 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No 1 to include Pew tracts currently in various stages of construction or review These tracts previously agreed to the establishment and maintenance of park- ways as a condition of approval At tits meeting, the Coomissionrrs indicated that they would like further information on the following issues: 1 Cost of maintenance of all parkways Citywide on a per lot basis. • 2. Nses for beautification funds versus maintenance district funds 3. Methods available for annexation to the District. CITY11IDE MAII(TENANCE The staff is not able at this time to p,ecisely define the overall maintenace cost for a Citywide program because of the uncertainty of parkway development, parkway development standards and the lack of a complete inventory of the parkways to be maintained The staff is currently working on standards for parkway development making use of �•)ro extensive hardscape elements to reduce planting and maintenance costs , a expected that maintenance costs under the revised standards will be mu,: Iewer than the historical costs developed to date. Utilizing the current %oination and with a brief inventory of remaining parkways, it is estima.ed that per lot charges Citywide would range from $50 to $60 per lot per yea This is a slight reduction over the limited program prcpused under Landscap- District No 1 BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS Parkways within the City fall into tF,-ee categories: I. Improved parkways adjac -nt to existing tracts - not maintained. 2. Parkways abutting unde,eluped land - to be developed 3. Undeveloped parkways adJacert to existing tracts. ��1/� I7'EI „J„ LANDSCAPE MAINTENAIICE DISTRICTS June 27, 1979 Page 2 Beautification fees were developed to provide a funding source for the development of category 3, undeveloped parkways adjacent to existing tracts, and for development of special boulevards These funds were not intended to cover maintenance cost. The Beautification fees are not a predictable source of revenue and depend on the level of resi- dential development within the City, because they will vary from year to year they will be used exclusively for construction. MAINTEIWO E FUNDING No funds currently exist for the maintenance of parkway improvements and many imlroved parkways are currently being lost because of lack of care Without development of future sources of revenue for maintenance, future tract improvements will also be lost ANNEXATION TO DISTRICT 0 Included within the June 13, 1979 Council packet, was a detailed procedure for the establisrment of Landscape and Lighting Districts This is the same procedure to be used in annexation to the Maintenance District It is the intention of the staff to aggressively pursue District Annexations • when Landscape District No 1 has been completed. Approval of these an- nexations will be difficult to obtain where the majority of the residents object to the District formation ALTERNATIVES The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway maintenance: 1 Maintained from general funds 2. Establishment of Maintenance Districts through ohased development and annexation 3 Development of Citywide tax for maintenance of parkways - requires election 4 Do not maintain landscaped parkways. Parkway maintenance cost will expand as development continues making funding with general funds impossible without sacrifice of other City services. Establishment of a Citywide tax should be pursued through election as soon as the parkway beautification program has been established. As a incremental step at implementing Citywide maintenance district, Alter- native 2 should be implemented to prevent loss of current capital investments. If none of the above are accomplished, parkways in the City will not be maintained M6 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS • June 27, 1979 Page 2 E CONCLUSION It Is recommended that the City establish Landscape and Lighting Districts as proposed for the following reasons: I without funds to maintain existing and planned landscaping, the current investment will be lost. 2 established tolencourage thernareaseof thehCityito join 7 maint enancetcost land ltow develop mcost teffective precise maintenance programs RECOPMENDATION That the Planning Commission recommend the establishment of Landscape and Lighting District No. 1 as one encompassing district with costs distributed on a per lot basis 1� � Chairman Rmpel asked for queatijea from the Commission of the Staff. Coolssioner Carcia indicated he personally does not see any problems with the time and temperature sign. It is a nice looking sign which is to be surrounded by a well landscaped area and will be a nice addition to the center. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there will be any visibility problems if the sign is located in this area. Hr Hogan stated no, the sign will be set back approximately 42 feet from 3ase11ne and will provide core than adequate visibility. A Motion was tads by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to approve Director Review Signs No. 79-02 as submitted. AYES: GARCIA, TOLS'TOY, JC.7ES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: DAHL a • r • e Mr. Lan asked that the Counisslon move to Icem "R" at this time and chic Item "C' be reviewed at such time Lloyd Rubbs, City Engineer, is in attendance. A Motion was made by Commissioner Carcia, seconded by Commissioner Tolscoy and unanimously carried to review Itm "E ". REPORT REGARDING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT • Bill Holley, Director of Community Services, reviewed the staff report in detail, this being on file in the Planning Division. Staff recommends that the Commission recommend the establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No 1 as one encrmpassing district with cost distributed on a per Iot basis. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the fees are set for landscape mafntenaaee dis- tricts. City Attorney indicated each year the City Council holds a public hearing co sec the fees end anyone objecting to the fees has tha right to protest. Commissloner Carcia stated the concept of landscape maintenance districts is progressiv+ for the City What he would like to sac is the development of a plan that •ould ultimately Include the entire city within a landscape main- tenance district. He would like to see the city broken down into zones and each zone have a district. Chairman Rempel stated he sees potential problems vith this proposal as It stands. It is his opinion that alternatives should be mentioned such as 1) a vote of the people within the city, 2) ways of annexation. 3) ways of deannexation. Hr. Holley stated staff is asking for Commission recommendation for the establish- ment o.• a landscape maintenance district. This Is the first step and the City can build from there. Tha City also shares the same concern vlth the establishment of a street lighting district. Staff would like to knw if the Commission supports this concept to build from as a first step. Planning Cmmlasion Minutes -7 -W Jane 13, 1979 Commissioner Tolotoy indicated this is a step in the right direction foc the City. Cbalrasa Recpel stated that it should be made clear which streets will be main - tafined aaa.tr the district to :rvofd confusion. I Cacvissioner Garcia stated he supports the conrtpt of parkway maintenance. However further study is needed as to what the program is actually going to untafl. He •ould also like to know the parameters and boundaries of the plan and vbether or not the entire City will eventually be included. :,r. Las indicated the boundary for the landscape maintenance district is the current city limits. Areas of the City are not proposed at this time to be i.ectivmd off. Any tract that wants to be included in the district can do so. Staff needs to know whether or mat the Commission and Council support this concept before the details of the program are developed. Chairman Reopel stated altexnativa types of fundings needs further examination to reflect an estimated future total for the entire city. A !lotion was made by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Coo¢Sasioner Tolatoy to - approve the ccncgt of a landscape maintenance district and a street lighting district :1th a more detailed report Lo come back to the Coaission for review In the aeu future. AYES: JOSES. AuLSIOL. CARCIA, REHM =-.S: A'Lq=: nAR1. a • • • a CiNEZAL PLAN A`ffi'41VR' - CIRCULATION r. L'= INDUSTRIAL AREA Ys. I= stated this report is for information purposes only. The Issues ralsvd by the Comml slnn that are not answered tonight will be fully addressed at the time of the public bearing. lie. rain Rocugeans Assistant Civil Engineer, reviewed the staff report and the Co - v3taate Reports in detail, these being on file in the Planning Division. Stmt re[n. A that the Commissioa receive and file the Consiltants report and schedule hearings for Anendmeat of the General Plan Circulation Element for Jume 27, 1979. Mr. Dilorio sta:ed tbere would be some concern from the property owners near Rochester if 6th Street were to go through and curve through their properties as it would limit vac of their proper ies. Chaltuam R®pel wondered if there are portions of 7th Street gu Lag east from Archibald that need to carry through. Mr. Dilorio stated the area between 7th and Rth Streers seems to be attractive for large scale distribution centers which should take up the entire area. This would cake it impossible to bring 7th Street through. His only concern flannimg C..-.taaim HILnutes -8- June 13. 1979 'A5 L L CITY OF RANCHO Ct (.AN.ONGA 14EMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 1279 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC STRIPE SERVICES Presently, traffic striping services for both new work and refreshing of existing markings is being done by County crews under the City's annual maintenance contract Because of the size of the County and the resultant conflicts in priorities, response to requests for striping have not been satisfactory The Engineering Division has obtained proposals from three contractors for the performance of striping services. These contractors now do similar work for cities in San Bernardino, Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Analysis of the bids indicated that the firm of Safety Striping in Anaheim is low bidder. This firm offers particularly good prices on certain strip- ing items comprising the bulk of our City's needs. Safety Striping contracts with the cities of Chino and Fontana as well as many Orange County cities. Chino has used the firm's services since 1963 and reports very good perform- ance and response time. is estimated that our City's striping maintenance cost will amount to .,,000 per year, allowing for some heavy wear areas to be restriped more than once a year All costs of a striping contract would be costs which would not be incurred under the annual maintenance contract with San Bern- ardino County and thus are not new costs. The following is a summary of the bid prices of major items and the quantities of striping requiring maintenance in the City: 10 COST EACH OR COST PER LIN. FOOT Dash Double Curb Cross Firm Stripe Stripe Letters Pointing Walks Safety Stripinq, Inc .022 /ft 134 /ft 2 12 ea .155/ft .21 /ft Cote -Mark, Inc. .08 /ft .30 /ft 4 50 ea - - - - - -- .30 /ft Consley 6 Montigny 045 /ft .14 /ft 5.00 ca .30 /ft .50 /ft 10 CONTRACT FOR TRAFFIC STRIPE SERVICES July 5, 1979 Page 2 Basic Striping Quantities in Rancho Cucamonga Dash stripe 261,500 Lin, ft Double stripe 105,000 Lin ft. Letters, X- walks, etc. 29,000 Sq ft It is r:commnded that a contract be negotiated, based on the quoted prices, with Sa.`ety Striping Services, Inc. for 1979 -80. Respectfully su mitted, } §41H u bS City Engineer LH:deb 0 • 7 7 IAFM YTIIFIFM oosax.•lxoe 'J1 t FJLLMOnE CALIF•.I1p1A M15 itfln•r•c1 m:r eyt FOUR INCH CMTERLIIIE OR LAME LINES ITF LINEAL FL'i I'1: II: RLr;=I'JE Edge Line ........ ... .... ... .. $ O b S G4H Broken Line (white It yellow) ....... ............... O1q oJ} S511d Line (white & yellow) ........................ o.i5' .04.L Double Solid Line ....... ............... .X Y .13•/ 8" (inch) Solid Line ......... .. ........... It 111: ,ralinieg ........... ............ .0 3 09.i b' ,wul Sot,J Lpw&• 044 All Light Foot I.ettera .............. ......... f 1 83 S d IZ Limit Bare ?XQ S% Fr ........................ I q .AY "RXh" Complete both aides track ............. ......... y9.00 (,/Do „RXk" one side only ........................ .:•q sU 3( i0 COIA:PETE CURB PAIKIINO AND ASPHALT BEIW All Colo:a ................. ...... S .ISJ S ..70 PAFKING :lfegonal Markings - including layout ........ .............. S 1.50 Parking T's ......... ......... .... . 7J CFO.i.34ALlti 12" PER SQUARE FOOT ........................ S . S „21 ARP171S State size for turn pockets ................... .... S 3.00 S&/00 Wrong (ay Arrows ........................ SHALL STMILS 18 inch ........................ S JY�J S Afi ! inch ........................ BLACKOUT PER SQUARE FOOT ........................ S •12 6 SANUBLASTM For square foot with no rfekup of asnd ......... ........ $ •✓J(? The atove prices incltde all coats to you. I(ICMF`T QUA::11 F•AI..T, LAMB MID GUARANTEED PERF•ORHAME. All pointing :o done to State rrec:ficetinna as to size Of stencil, spacing and quantities of tatat. Materials tined &need State arecifiestions. 166 COTE MARK INC. 6W,"K2M 6 IMY.... • o Dot 2167 cOMrto" 4urMM1A 60222 Juno 6th, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Pox 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Rougonu Gentlemen: The following is a list of price's for paint striping street s within your Oity. 7 9004!10 • 4" Solid yellow or white 0.10 per lin.ft. • 411 Skip yellow or white 0.08 per lin.ft. 8" Solid White 0.20 per lin.ft. 12" Solid Yellow or white x.30 per lin.ft. 4n Double yellow 0.30 per lin.ft. 4u Ono way barrier stripe 0.30 per lin.ft. Layout 0.06 per lin.ft. < Sandblast removal- lin.ft. y- 0.25 per lin.ft, x _ Sandblast removeal - sq.ft. 0.70 per s ft. Lcgende 9' Arrow) 07 50 each q y arf. Legends Latter) 04.50 each The above prices are ba.,ed on the following,n minimum days work 0680.00.Travel l.er move in 0141.00. The material used will be J.E. Dauer or Porvo. Billing will be submitted the last day of each month payment to be ten days after rcrolpt of billing. If you have any father questions please call. Since ly [i i'i !:F FFl:CI:J F 11 P:' ^I'GA t:1w'.07•I11 1FY:I Robert D. Gurney h'.l f21 31S,nla�!!'.Il'll i -131 ]1516 t 1 M7 •All.,.0 lot 3111VfNO • cla"Ic ► IIO[OIYt NAtiIt1 I •1 F 1 w�rttt N••n •5 • rcr -An eorrcme • rrrr R.WMn Nlron• I .,I 71 mnnw.m i:• MFGS. OF fllr: ^f ;T l•lllrrC STOPS ENCDICECHIC. DC51CN. LNn IRRAll4110N 9 17171 4412416 l21 T1 771 n r ,O ��L /i1�SI \fy1 NC11 __ RAMP. FTO CIiCFl11ZpP1•!!11 ,lr,.. VAr." ON COMPLETION. uNlne rnnli 1. Annk."'t N[N,,nv.r gam�STATE CONTQACTOD CICENEC !10. 70955 I I•• ,y - -I• SI<,� L�elln,.• or 1111),f (.+)1\ 1..•il �17.os fia.l{. Ell doable ��eUr,•, �. I•} 1.,,.; 1 <J.Iti L,d.1?. �. Doo6le ye-??o,,, 7wowgl /1etl lut ti- tl. l^ i LIB IF l'I 1:.N I '1 {. 1. 8" kme. 17 I.., -1'1 =+ • 12" Cross oAllc Isle or SI,.p 1,17r n 1f• :,.I 11 t'• `) ' .. } In. Sol, 4" I,nl� q cJ•. 1. •1 il. c�.1,:, I�I,,�I Il• tiAIC7 }BIS � I }rrn WS S C+f+ 1•A. i,f•h ll. f} 31gck o,Ai• f1..1.Ale - a.c•., 1.:, �•? — f} 10. RXR SaNs `.n nl P?C1c 11. Imo' ql ICiNc� -T", -'S - .A _C) E, ]I. j.f•r. eA. 12 3or4••IeF}ua J l' /. 4p. O•tn, C�. 13. we} 5nNC161n:,i •:'' I.l: l•i' • CY1,r/l 0,1) m ul AIle v nn S1 rid, ^I.} �)(�... H ? M. N)1) Ili sArid 151n• i 01,•1•.• c1:.2 )• °�, • °y i • r RESOLUTION NO 79- 55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROV'01NG PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENT TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING CGHMISSION FOR EXPENSES INCURRED WHILE SERVING AS MEMBERS OF THE .;OMil,SION WHEREAS, the Lcneral Law of the State of California provides that a city planning commission may be appointed for the purpose of administer+ag both Clay and State laws relating to planning, zoning, and land use, and WHEREAS, members of the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission devote substa, al time and effort on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and WHEREAS, Planning Commissioners are required as a part of their resoonsibllitie: to make on -site inspections of properties which will be disT cussed at future Planning Commission meetings, and WHERFP:, as a result of these inspections, memb -r- of the Planning Commission routinely incur certain expenses related to the use of their personal vehicles and to the performance of their official duties for the City, and WHEREAS, it is dopropriate that Planning Commissioners receive ome reimbursement for expenses related to the discharge of their official duties. NOd. THEREFORE, the City Louncil of the City of Rancho : ucamonga does hereby resolve that members of the Planning Commission shall receive the sun. of twenty -five dollars ($25 00) per meeting, not to exceed fifty dollars ($50.00) per worth to offset a portion of the expenses incurred while serving as members of the Planning Commission .r PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of .aly, 1979 +.YES: NOES ABSENT 40 ATTEST 1 y Clerk N lad —„ames C Frost Mayor MEMORANDUM I Date July 3, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From: B!11.Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Informatioa Only - Project HOY This corning, Armando Navarro, who addresaed Council in April of 1976 on behalf of Project HOY. indicated his intention of requesting trop Council. at meeting of July 5, several thousand dollars (exact amounr had not been determined) from the Revenue Sharing allocarion to augmt.at his program. Purpose of requested funding would be for rental of the facility, known as the Contact Station, on 24th Street. Project HOY has had a very unstable ecord of performance since its in-option some 15 months ago Tuey are on their fourth project director, at their third location, and viable funding is looking very bleak beyond the fall of this year I do not believe their written records of performance balancer against my personal observation and the good faith shown Their operation by the City They are setting up a "public relations" session on Tuesday, July 24, 10:00 a.m., at the Contact Station, to tell everyone, including the press, of their "new" program, and w!ll be inviting Council and Staff as well I wi!l be in attendance Staff Reco=endation Should a request for funding be made, thank Project HOY for it's input and proceed PH /mw , To: From: Subject M E M O R A N D U M Date: July 3, 1979 City Manager and Council Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Added Agenda Item, July 5, 1979 - Lions Park Deed Transfer The County of San Bernardino and the Cucamonga District Lions Club have agreed to transfer ownership of Lions Park and it's facilities to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This transfer has been in the works for well over a year This protraction of a relatively simple operation is lue to two factors; the pace of the County and the reluctance of the Lions Club to authorize the property transfer to the City without insuring protection of the original intent of the donation That original intent was that the property excluding the library portion, be used f.r "park purposes only" You may recall at the time of incorporation, the Lions Club was very concerned that the City offices would be located in the facility to the exclusion of recreational and community uses We have assured the Lions Club that the City will honor the deed restrictions and the intent of the donation in seeing that the park and it's facilities are used for "community purposes" Find attached tke Agreement Deed, stating that the City will use the property for err, ano Recreation urposes", and the Grant Deed on Lions Park from County to the City Recommended Action Accert the transfer of the Lions Park property from the County to the City and accept the conditions of the ASreement Deed between the City and U•e Cucamonga District Lions Club, auc or z ng c e Mayor to sign the latter These documents will be forwarded to County for Board action on the Grant Deed Attachments BH /-, w AND WHEN RECORDED Matt TO AGREEMENT DEED I A.P. No. 208 - 011 -57 1 CUCAMONGA DISTRICT LIONS CLUB, a California Corporation and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, Incorporated under the laws of the State of California by 2 annual agreement between said parties, 3 do hereby agree that that certain restriction as rscited In that certain deed from Cucamonga District Lions Club, a California Corporation to the County of • San Bernardino, a body corporate and politic, recorded September 7, 1973, In Book 8263. page 83, official Records of said County, which reads as follows: s This conveyance Is made and accepted upon the express restriction that the a land being conveyed shall be used for County building and park purposes only and that the portion of said land not occupied by the library building shall be 7 known as "Lion's Park ", provided, that a breach of the foregoing shall cause said premises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who e shall have the right to enforce lamediate re -entry upon said premises In the event of any such breach, Is hereby modified to read as follows: This conveyance Is made and accepted upon the express restriction that the 10 land being conveyed shall be used solely for Park and Recreation purposes and that portion of said land not occupied by the Library building shall be known tt as "Lions Park ", provided that a breach of the foregoing shall cause said prem- ises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who shall 4 Aave the right to enforce Ismedtate re -entry upon said premises In the event of any such "reach. t) t• DATE: CUCAMONGA I TRI T S 'us, m� a Call a I By: n Ty- : fl ✓!ri✓�.✓Ls� to ti1- DATE: 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 20 By: aces C, ros mayor PwA 21 By: :a: Vs 22I Lauren Wasserman, C ty C ark Afe to i !L 231 .fwss of f i.,r.t, Nj j rd 5, 23 -1- :a /ache 26 (See Page 2 for Acknowledgment) Mr 27 vLow � .1. .NAME PROJECT NO FATICEL R0208'011-57 MS 13 TO CERTUY THAT THE INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY CONVEYED BY THE WITHIN MSTRUMENT DEMO A- F. Jr DErn FROM THE CCUNfY OF SAN OERMARQHO 2 _ re the City of Rancho Cucamonna. q HEREBY ACCEPTED Ill ORDER OF City CouaclI AND THE GRANTEE CCNSENrS TO THE RECORDATION THEREOF BY ITS QTLY AUTHnm2E0 CrTICER DATED GRANT DEED NO TAX DUE THE COUNTY OF SAIL BERRARDIYO, a body corporate and politic, for a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby GRANTS to THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. Incorporated under the laws of the State of California, the following 'ascribed real property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California: That portion of North 528.00 feet of Lot 11, Hap of Subdivision "C ", Cucamonga Vineyard Tract, as per Map recorded in Book 21 of Maps, Page 67, In the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Lot 11; Thence South 00' It' 30" West along the East line of said Lot 11, a distance of 20 00 feet to a point of Intersection with a line that Is parallel Ti1TJI and 20 00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot it; Thence West along said parallel line, a distance of 250 OC feet to an inter- section with a line that Is parallel with and 250 00 feet Westerly of the East line of said Lot 11, being the True Point of Beginning. Thence South GO' 11' 30" West along said parallel line, a distance of 335.00 feet to an Intersection with a line that Is parallel with and 355.00 feet South- erly of the North line of said Lot 11; Thence East along said parallel line, a distance of 250 00 feet to an Inter- section with the East line of said Lot 11; Thence South 00' 11' 30" West along the East tine of said Lot II. a distance of 173 00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 10, Tract No. 3573, as per Hap recorded in Book 50 of Maps, Pages 102 and 103, In the office of the Recorder of said County; Thence West along the North line of said Lot 10, a distance of 382.58 feet to an Intersection with the East line of that parcel of land described In Deed recorded Nay 11, 1964, In Book 6146, Page 423. Official Records; Thence North 00' 11' 30" East along said East line, a distance of 488 07 FaA feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the Southeast and having a avti..R's radius of 20 00 feet; Ace .b ! Thence Tlortheasterly along said curve through a central angle of 89' 48' 30 ", .rasa Br a distance of 31 35 feet to a point of tangency with a line that Is parallel with j • and 20 00 feet Southerly of the North line of said Lot It; jw.°'a of Thence East along said parallel line, a distance of 112 65 feet to the True Point of Beginning vr, Subject to the recital In the deed from Cucamonga District Lions' Club, M. a California Corporation, to the County of San Bernardino, a body corporate and B Y i I I n n a. LL _i ^s 10 11 .4t .l l I :Politic, recorded September 7. 1973 In Book 8263, Page 83 of Official Records, as follows: This conveyance is made and accnpted upon the express restriction that the I land being conveyed shall be used for County building and park purposes only and that the portion of said land not occupied by the library building shall be 1 known as "Llon -s Park ", provided, that a brei ch of the foregoing shall cause said premises to revert to the grantor, his heirs, successors, or assigns, who Shall have the right to enforce Immediate re -entry upon said premises in the event of any such breach. a T Witness the hand of the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, and the seat of the County of San Bernardino, of the State of California this x day of 19 U COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO lu By It .ATTEST: Chairman, Board of upery sors ANDREE DISNAROON, Clerk of the 1 -' Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County By II Deputy IS STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) I0 COUNTY OF SAN BERhAROINO ) ss 17 On , 19 before me, the undartlgned, a Notary Pabirc in and for said ounty and State, P: sonally appeared x known to me to be the Chairman of the Botrd of Supervisors of said County and ANDREE DISNAROON By: , known to M to be the Deputy Clerk s of the Board of Supervisors tht executed the wltIAn Instrument, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the body O politic and corporate therein named, and acknowledged to me that such body 1 politic and corporate executed the within Instrument pursuant to Its by -laws or a resolution of its Board of Supervisors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public In and or said County and State. tr + fl r L: r � A s+> 00 PO&TJOAl flF LDTJ /, CUC.4140 IG.4 Y1J✓E7/.RD TledCT, 14..6. Z11f7 JN THE CJr.Y CfC .?,4WC.'199 C4lC- 4AfONGiJ I- £ BA5f LJNC- AYENUE ✓Pfr — ' � 10' ------------ 44 J ZZ w V V c, covArri or 1 LIONS P�JRX 5 //✓ eFZJJ. e /JUD I SAN PcRNAROlNI PUBLIC FORKS AGENCY r /" /00' Joe LOG Na SO /L PAOXC7 Na NOOOM 3 -/6 -77 M C M 0 R A N 0 " TO: Laurrn Wasserman FROM: Ha•ry Eiape '�— — SUBJECT: Long Term Disability Sow time has been sr In reviewing accepting quotes .� va ousagentswithegardto to trmdisabiityisurance All bids were based on the employees on board as of May 1, 1919. And as the staff grows, so will the premium as it is based on a certain cost factor per $100.00 salary Even though we asked for bids which included 30 and 60 day elimina- tion periods, I feel that the 30 day period would be more beneficial to the up any equity in sick leave to cover an extensiveoeliminationoperiod, a 30 day elimination period. and f5aye�l for das sixty e set day period On the attached sheet i have listed the bids in the order i considered to be the best program available. The second the effect oftthhiseprograms is that athe lemployee nhas arb benefit, but may not be able to use it. T �I N q� 0pJ �p 4s w V W YPf d d U Y6 � u• • b � �0 .V. dOye p M N C1 C N g Y Y G C UgpOl• b CAL L L C� N ^pgl OV J dd Cy ��YWj(l m «r pn :9 �6 N �n .�•� �n =yLG� sAdY 8 N = > = N d \ E N V pC 9 L@ y^ b OPT UOI �Oq 1O� P m N m U 10 q r•� •• d Y Y L ^ d A J n N 6'N nn V >C CN_NC ado ^LCN O 1n/'� n' 12 9 22 6• J-O! c LL ILL X 12 wo P pC� a G nV L G u Y C 0 o p o p 6 6 6 6 6 V-2 O N d L 1 @r� o n � V ^ .gyp-• i-• wNn .Ni N U 1" � A WN •Vp 6 6 @ � y9q C�VA 6 � s 6 U 1'1 1•f 1�1 � � .V. p y� � � N i. d6 d Nd� �� 6 O O s s s s s C u IC y Cp pp S YpppG��1 O O s O O O Y P ^^Y N N O L C M a N M M N Y n N L 'O L gg 0 0 eq N O M g aL 3 Y Ndv e d st da ^ M O b b b b O Y O d N V A1� G 1 v L A A A A C V dL Y g a i ^ n M C A L T O N M am' n V i J O Y v G d9O m w�Agpd d C T V s O O O O O V C Y d d d@ qq L O O O T •� co V ^a C C W N d O p G h q yJ O Cryry O.r OO Co •�N L CH�V OnBE�d T C PNpJ A � CC b O V gV O O O b 1D 10 b tD 10 aA 0 d N p Y yd d LM l C Y u d C L d y N� nu c a ^u ac N F- Y 2us f < co, r a! Q A 6 6 6 6 \ \ A A \ d O S n Y U fi J C C 1tY V L L N � w j J J d d c C C V q q t0 Cl � N N r Y J• Q N r P YGW vN f0 10 N M N N O Yf NV 'JdyN N Y• d Q O OI fi C N r Y Y gg° TEI P OI 1'1 I� N a V� V M Y u TyppyJy QP N 11 O N n N d• AyLN d °pug I(N1 N N C S Z� N N N vyy { q � YCCJ p A q C NI r•1 r•1 L L d O ' L •r N G U M V M d L d L M L CY O N {W / 12 Vv - W.2 ay 6 6 tN 0 y A W T x rn Y 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL Y. g q y t 0 O.La p N •O C♦ L Ur O L � �M�A .Y 6 L J d pp 1 a G o C d 6 u f') f'•f 1�1 (7 1'1 17 O •• N C _O A _O d !•at Y.� T G L�il�il } °a T�yfi1 C S S O S O S ° 4i u' u C qcq11 _c^ O iiiCOJJJ 6 O O O O 8 O C .O q q T x C N N N N N N B 5 a O O 4 V N q m N N N N N N O U 1.l d a N d ua L A~ •°�+ Ul N N Iff b b �° b N b N b a C V Oa d d•.. Y.C6�u Ot de o oudL 1q L d d d d P 01 OI OI d O� d OI b UGd U A > 0.41 y� T ^L A •Y d A A A A A A d V L TO � M CL6 6 A \ \ \ \ y \1 \ > mm—. • 9 O u x6 i 1 1 1 L L N C !P O L 1 1 1 1 T T C d A q••T qM�•N 6a q N J dN N> C a y x d N d QI O f.a J q 0 d C Lf1U� O H a C 9 2 2 8 uw d 6 Y L u ~ CC O O O NyT ° U ° U O O L u L Y. 0!2 0, d � 0 0 0 x a9 x ° TM N =md N N M q N N C ayy• Cc pt U L , 5 gco.q••- T Z v �ud�c a M N 6 L u V> L L d C NI O d d N L 24 N O x� 7u 66 t°JOaL O W O b O O O O 6 A Y! V L 9z L edi E 1°il •' "C" : I Y Z : o o, H u C C A A C C p C 6 6 q A \ A q A O ^ d O u J u C u w d d Is• d N Y �-C. T J J q L A y1 y1 m L v C q C C M q qC pC� yC }.