Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/08/15 - Agenda Packet
e A G E N I A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School Mu "i- Purpose Room 710E Carnelian August 10, IM AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE All !teas submitted for th3 City Council agenda must be ir. writing The deadline for submitting items is 5 00 p.m. nn the Thursday prior to the flrst and third Wednesday of each month The City Clark's office receives all such hums 1. CALL TO ORDER. " "'SE %�odior- c�f.�tf ✓�gt.lf Gar �p.r /7 A. Pledge to Flay • B. Roil Call: Mikes ✓ Palombo -x/. Schlosser V ,Bridge Frest V< C Approval of R1 tes: July 5, 1979 and August 1, 1979 2. A. Y• IOUNCEMENTS� /�/pL- 7b- +a'ra��'�� a Council b. Staff Ul�Owaut� ar,ww�.t/L B3 3. COMMITTEE REPORTS. �, / fF 4 t iwlhR 6a.-i- `Im"4 fowuL a Advisory Committeegowe 'Md.A., wilt r 5c =y b. Historical Commissionpew to eolupj uW ,@i"es %.t3 /ZEy ei� kt 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. rt tkt-5 — Foltu. f3,1 S o Thu fol'winq consent Calontjr Item arw expected to be routine and non- contro- vurstal huu will be •t.d upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council cemb,.r, s --..` member, or interested ptrty mat, request tha- an item be removed from the Consent Calendar for later discussion a Approval of warrants to the amount of 5283,214 57 1 Register No 79 -8 -15 -- b. Request authorization to atter.•i International City -' C `J City Council Agenda -2- Management Association annual conference Authorization is requested for the city manager to attend the Interna- tional City Management Association annual conference in vnoeoix in mid- ,ktober Funds have been included in the current yezr's budget for this particular conference c AcSe tance of Parcel�_No. 4370. The two -lot Parcel Map was tentative y approved by the County on February 15, 1978 The owner has combined efforts with his neighbors to have installed the required street improvements The map was plan checked by the County and has been revised to show the City's certificates The owner has now complied with the conditions of approval and the map is ready to record RESOLUTION NO 79 -66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITv rnm4ril OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4370, (TENTATIVE PARCEN MAP NO 77 -0446) IMPROVEMENT AriREEMENT, AND IMPROVE- MENT SECURITY August 15, 1979 d Tract No. 930¢; Release of old bonds 5 Acceptance of New Bonds The Bulisaki Framers' bonds placed with the County have been held until the problems of funding could be solved Anaheim Savings has submitted bonds to replace those pre- sently on file with the City new old Performance bond (road) $115,200 00 $ 96,000 Labor S Material (road) S 57,600 00 S 48,000 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council release the old insufficient bonds and then accept the new bonds which reflect current construction costs f Tract 9448. Accept roads and release bonds to Meeker Develop- ment Located on the southwest corner of Beryl and Banyan Performance bond (road) S 94,000 Tract 9322. Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes Located north of Highland Avenue and west of Jasper Performance bond (road) $748,000 Tract 9305: Release of bonds to The Jones Company Located on the northeast cornea of Hermosa Avenue and Monte Vista Cash Staking Bond S 4,100 _3 - 4 5 7 7 8 • n �J City Council Agenda -3- August T50 EM Tract 9449: Release of ':ash Band to Thomptan Associates. k :oca the southeast corner of Basel ire and Ramona. Cash Deposit $ 2,3rO Tract 9188. Release of bonds to Suncrest Ontario Company. ocated on the north side of Arrow Route west of Baker Avenue Labor d Material bond (road) S 16,000 La.,or d Material bond (water) 5,500 Labor d Material bond (sewer) 6,000 Tract 9518. Release of bonds to Suncrest Ontario Co. ¢ Located �tween Arrow Route and the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, west of Baker Avenue. Labor d Material bond (road) S 15,000 Ldbur E Aateriat bond (sewer) 5,50 Labor b Material bond (water) 6,500 Tract 9519. Release of bonds to Suncrest O.rtario Co g? Located on the south side of the Southern Pacific Rail- road right -of -way, west of Baker Ave Labor 8 Material bond (road) S 20,000 labor b taterial bond (sewer) 8,000 ,abor d Material bond (water) 6,000 Tract 9429 Accept roads and release bond to Valle Verde 4 Developxnt Corp. Located on the north side of 19th St. at Cartilla Avenue Performance bond (road) S 78,000 Tract 9370. Accept roads and release bond to Valle Verde Development Lori) Located on the north side of 19th St between Haven and Bandola. Performance bond (road) S 56,000 Tract 9419. Release of bonds to Centennial Homes. Located TID Fn the east side of Archibald Aven. north of Arrow Route. Performance bond (road) S 73,000 Labor b Material bond (read) 35,000 Labor d Material bond (sewer) 91500 Labor 6 Material bond (water) 16,000 City Council Agenda F. -5- /hoF>sa.. d9erl6ar- -7 i97 9 August 15, 1979 An Ordinance extending the moratorium. The current 94 ordinance expire on August since further tine Is stilt needed for the study and preparation of a com- prehensive growth manag,mmnt prog -am for the city, it is recomaended that 9r- Jinance No 64 -B be approved which extends the mora"lyrium until "__ == 1979 '0W&- .y1 6ee 8 ORDINANCE NO. 64 -8 (Urgency) Y - - �/ y� 95 l "e. /cyei+ ate.' 7�.v AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY 000CIL OF THE CITY OF 1 s � � mac... / WICHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORN:;., EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE NO. 64 AND DE- CLARING THE URGENCY W- 195. C.GVd/vv� �!P /rjs Q. o�Or vA.,ee. 83 is iy D 6. CITY 4iktU1GER'S STAFF REPORTS. �K SEC6t /o J�t7jt�i�tl foo A. ,PrD fcrt Es egnza. Request for City funding assistance _ 96 by r;attonal ]nsti Lute for Lomauni ty Development ✓Jm 9 A ororal of a Stud tD Invests ate Alternative Financin 97 P,etno s or n ras tructure n the n ustr a one epor 5 -0 >(y Jacx Lam. Sr, f?..t s 57 JA< FZ- P�J �J C A� ro yal of Pha�17 of the Industrial SDeci fic Plan. 99 e7oN rt Dy Jack Lam. S'O b V. — yre � .c 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. n e) r�_'a ' e /%Lri ;Lm B. T1EY BUSINESS. he�z.ery irao flr/are9vr.4 a. Council I�/r orrode� �°s r7remn �Foo D. Audience fy�c of gt.vs�20E7Ky /' -eV'eew 9 ADJOINttr<MEM. Cpl i _ 3// 80 �oG yarrzJ SO © rt cCA /orr� / o': otC) f • /cs„Gm /vtlu.,� .ev � ere >'i.�a fiJ /1•wi. /� %7��se aM` ,l••w S � axvSa.�� 1!•� �� e ��.,,Ass . G 0. ���� �-� /aa, 5a —se b r (o4ojAv !i ptil n'!J /tltl�s Cavir� CA, ,4 Lee,�� • City Council Agenda 0 4- August 15, 1979 Tract Loce9U8outh Release 01F bonds to of Malachite s, Inc Malachite at Performance bond (road) $ 88,000 Labor 6 Material bond (road) 44,000 Labor E M 10,b00 Material bond (water) 14,000 Labor d Material pond (sewer) Refer 00Claim the CityaAttorney forthe amount of handling 66. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A eal of Ne attve Or.'aratt o•i and Site A royal. P M No__2 Hon, anTAssoc ates. equest or tFe develop - tJtw lotatedfesn the southeast corner 9ofnHeS lmancAvenueion and Basel n_ Avenue within the A -F (Administrative ro- fessional) zone known as arcel W r; 431 -14 A peal of Minor 6eviation No. 79 -i1 - Hone and Associates. located deviat southeastrcorner tof Baseline and Hell— t0perty for 5e C: ,eerai Plan Amendment No. 79 -01A - Strand Cormom+ealth. „ ostirr a Change rom t e present es 9 "located or on indu•t•ial to service commercial for property on the -outheaqst corner of Haven am Foot sb� bet.eirwt General Plan Amendment No. 79S lE - C�esent Resc 9natlon M_T u:amonga. request to c au e : e p of density residential to low density residential /- for the property located on the south side of 19th Street betweet. Archibald and Ainethytt. � General a Amendments. e s E Re Arvn io a ra rSeTomaes Gep anmndmentsmadat tnis and previous meetings official RESOLUTION NO. 79-67 ^ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C°CAMONGA, C11IFORNIA,AMENOIRG THE ADOPTED INTERIM - CIRLATION AND PUBLIC ' ELEMENTS OFOTHEERANCHO UCAMONGA GENERAL PLANLITIES 70 42 44 69 72 85 91 92 AWAVV - r ItQ67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NA �t/JlG� I,APR A VEN 9 V E N D O R N A M E WARR MVMAIG DATE NET pp CO228 0(1230 1125 BAKER, BENNICcE VANGUARDTLEAS +SYSTEM 7/27/79 7/31/79 37.50 273.33 914J ING 9 629.00 CC 3` 232 7905 POSTMASTER 8/06/79 Ir 500.00 0(1 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 8/06/79 126.55 82146 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 7/18/79 397.55- 2238 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 8/15/79 02239 VOID FOR14S ALIGNMENT 8/15/79 02240 VOID FORMS ALIGNMENT 8/15/79 02241 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT. A H 8/15/79 1#488.40 02242 0031 AM INTERNATIONAL INC 6/15/79 74.50 C2243 0145 ADVEN IN ACHVMA T SEN 8115/79 100.00 02244 0175 AIRITE WIG C C INC 8/15/79 96.64 02245 0326 AMER SOC HTG REF A/C EN R/15/79 42.00 02246 0800 AUTHELET BEVERLY 8/15/79 39.31 18 02247 1100 BAIRO DIANE 8/15/79 72.00 4 +321.88 02249 1275 BARMAKIANMWOLFF C ASSOC 8/15/79 1#000.00 02250 1300 BASELINE HARDWARE 8/15/79 176.73 0 ?251 1305 8AUSMITH. BRUCE 8/15/79 16.00 02252 1500 BLUE CROSS 8/15/79 2 #250.52 02253 1882 BUTTERS HARLAN 8/15/79 21.60 02254 18821 BUILDINE NEWS INC 8/15/79 182.64 02255 1900 c G ENGINEERING 8/15/79 1.784.19 02256 1903 C H J MAILS LAD INC 8/15/79 335.50 02257 2400 CARR PAPER COMPANY 6/15/79 02.58 2400 COOK/ARTHUR INC 8:15/79 629.58 629.96 02259 2450 BERN CO SAN BN $HER[ 8/15/79 30:729.09 - 2500 &CROWE COVI NGTON C GWATE 8/15/79 Srzz799.75 0226U 02261 2575 CUCAMONGA CO WATER GIST 8/15/79 02262 2595 CUCAPGNEP PRINTING 8/15179 1#719.39 77 02263 2650 CAILY REPORT 8/15/79 46.80 �Y 0Z264 2675 DALE. LORETTA 8/15/79 22.50 02255 2677 DALE SHARP INC 8/15/79 53,202.60 02266 0 :267 2680 2700 DEAN POOLS OETCO EENGRAVTNC /TROPHY 8/15/79 e/ 5/79 124.88 55.97 02268 286C OCN LE. CONSTRUCTION 8/ 5/79 5 #000.00 t 02269 04C E S T AU EDUCATION CORP 8/!5/79 250.00 02270 3175 EASTMAN INC 6/15/79 186.56 0:271 3305 EMPLCYMENT DEV DEPT 8/15/79 2:464.75 02272 408C FERNANOEZ RAMCIIA 8/15/79 10.00 02273 02274 4125 FOOTHL CHAPT -ICBCB GREY FRIECMANr OEE DEE 9/15/79 6/15/79 19.00 07275 4150 4500 GEANNES, SHIRLEY 8/15/79 194.00 345.60 02276 4600 GENERAL TELEPHCNE CO 8/15/79 174.72 02277 4700 GORDCNS INC 8/15/79 8/15/79 48.96 02278 4810 HANHATT C SONS 224.54 7p 0:279 4830 HAYGOOD# JIM 8/15/79 16.00 111 02280 5110 ION 8/15/79 1#814.34 02281 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 8/15/79 382.55 02282 6175 JOBS AVAILABLE 8/15/79 60.00 02283 6550 KABEL, STEVE B/15/79 32.78 02284 02285 6575 KAPLAN EVE CAROLYN 8/15/79 8/15/79 4.00 C 02286 6655 6830 LANG LOGU�. SALLY 6/15/79 356.40 02287 6850 LOS ANGELES TIMES 8/15/79 15.56 4.80 02288 7220 PATCHAN KAREN C 8/15/79 47,52 C 02289 7290 PC ALLISTER, NANCY 8/15/79 25.011 02290 7291 MEYER, PAT 8/15/79 16.00 02291 7303 MILES FREDDIE B 8/15/79 435.00 02292 3C5 7360 MILLER AILEEN �ERRY 8/15/79 81.00 02293 0.294 7375 MOHLE C ASSOC MONAHAN 8/15/79 8/15/79 893.00 CLAUDIA 42.00 02296 7500 MD,NNO SYSTEMS 82152799 320.00 DAYALANd 82.00 1. 02297 7509 NAIL PIC C PK ASSOC / 5/79 15/79 50.00 0.298 7540 NIEVES, KATHY S/ 94.50 10 023CO 7790 PITNEY,80WESX 8/15279 170.00 10 VUBLI Cf EMPURETIREMENT 8%15279 L 0Z293C2 79885 S 4#364.06 02304 RANCHO FLOWERSH 46.00 8045 SERVICE 2/15279 L 02305 8075 RAPID OA TA INC 6/15/79 502.00 02306 8127 RICHARD$, GARY 0/15/79 90.64 NET 210.100 37.•,0 12.12 `12.15 i5r73.3 344.]5 _ 45.00 85.00 170.52 _16.00 53.90 501.D0 --16.00 .. 10.00 4.00 112.70 560.00 - '1,200.45 40.00 203,214.57 �A R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARR WARR 9 VEN ! V O N D 0 R N A M E WARR O ri'19 02307 8196 SULLIVAN PE, ROBERT R 8/15/79 02308 83011 S A N S 8/15/79 • 02309 83120 SAN ANTONIO CORM HOSPIT 8/15/79 AMERICAN 8/15/79 02313 8325 5$SCHROEDER, -po"' — 8390 CALIF • 02313 95 SOUTHERN GASSC0 8115/79 SPECIALTY TYPEWRITER SV _ 79 02315 8525 STATIONERS 0515 • 02316 02317 8531 8540 STOUT, 8/15/79 SUN T LEGpAM 8/15/79 02318 8625 TANNER, ANN 8/15/79 02319 8675 TE`'ACO INC 8/15/79 02320 8710 TILE INS C TRUST CO 8/15/79 • 02321 8770 TOTAL PLAN 8/15/79 p yf cif 02323 919C Jaa MAHLEYSM JA�K ?" - -� `- 8%15%79 02324 9200 "ASSERMAN LAUREN H 8/15/79 • 02325 9250 WELLS FAR60 TRUSTEE 8/!5/79 02326 9490 WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC 8/15/79 02327 9990 XEROX CORP 8/15/79 • YFINAOLL 8/5/ 02329 VOID SERVICE L TOTALS 179 • • l,rfl s • • • • • •7 NET 210.100 37.•,0 12.12 `12.15 i5r73.3 344.]5 _ 45.00 85.00 170.52 _16.00 53.90 501.D0 --16.00 .. 10.00 4.00 112.70 560.00 - '1,200.45 40.00 203,214.57 �A {' � '•••-'•+ ytlitl�liil >11SJiM•,{Kpt�itlti'HlYt3' � tea: r.•.� atla � R C OOOy n I :E V,= t , O I 1 0V C Ir tD m t e a a 0 e° x° Q C O O u' Ar 1J •ti I I i I I • L7R:1S l � o' a o nI G I - �� �• r N N P3 .A Wf( =z a °A -3 r r �• b atla � R C OOOy n I :E I I i I I • L7R:1S l � o' a o nI G I - �� �• r N N P3 .A Wf( =z a °A -3 r r �• b atla � R C OOOy n I :E V,= RESOLUTION NO. 79.56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NO 77 -0446) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMEN'i SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Mumber 77 -0446, submitted by Linville - Sanderson -Morn Ecgineers Subdivider, and consisting of two parcels, located on the north side of HLldan Fame Road between Sinstone and Moonstone being a division of Parcel one of Parcel Map No 3222 use approved by the Planning Commission of San Bernardino County an February 15, 1979 as provided In the State Subdivision Hap Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Hap Number 4370 is the Final Map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map, and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agree- ment submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient impruvanent security, and submits for approval Bald Final Map offerirg for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of • Rancho Wr"aaonga, California, as follows; I That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 1s approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of saio City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2 That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certi- fdcato thereon behalf of said City; and 3 That said Parcel Hap Number 4370 be and the same Is hereby approved ani the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 0 Mayor ATTEST: 1 1 _ LJ E 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEMORANDMi Date: August 15, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Lloyd D. Hibbs, City Engineer Subject: CONSENT CALEhUAR - TRACT No 9706 - REPLACL4ENT BONDS The Bull.aki Frmers Bond a placed with the County have been held until the problems of funding Could be solved. Amhalm Savings has submitted bonds to replace those presently on file with the City New Old Road (Perforoence) $115,200.00 $96,000 Road (Labor 6 Mat trials) $ 57.600.00 $48,000 RECOMMEN)ATION: It is recomended that the City Council release the old insufficient bonds and then accept the new bonds which reflect current construction costs. Respectfully submitted - L IIUBBS City Engineer LBH:JLM:= 5 Ilrw,• S. •,••, c•nw ,n I l �. „ :iq J`ccr au ..+ �T IA/:�V /W .S ! ra •.,,u ,!•w.... v.l,. .. � i N ra-r Cn n r, C a . a••un 1• t i n � . • � ' J� rI .�].:J •I. .. •• •w • mar ! �t•• v 1 i � V.::. r jl • rq Lc lot It VIVO A4. {t'' •aa1F a:i , t.r.:_•._ •�I' _t% '? �� F • •i n ., N ��.:.` .�...r.� � ' }PBf:.i.• I ..: '.. �i�/ I... S.t -:SI `. Gii `i , .T ! k� /fi' �•; •�' �± ..d`J•<Iza�±:. r'- ' -_� +L•`� -. -r._- .__�)�. "r J. t'�;i::• ,I-- �^'?"�'1 il�`��. `� CITY OF RANCHO CU:AHUV MEHORANDIDI Date: August 15, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: CONSENT CALENDAR - RELEASE OF BONDS Tract 9448 - Accept roads and release bonds (Moos P-0 Located on the southwest corner of Beryl Stteet and Banyan Street OIrTER: Meeker Development Cempaay 132 Past Live Oaks Avenue Arcadia, California 91006 Performance Bond (Road) $94,000 NOTE: The read construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the made be accepted The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, walls and street signs. Tract 9322 - Accept roads and release Lands (r.,s y— G) located north of Highland Avenue and carat of Jasper Street Ut1NER: Lewis Homes of Callfomia P 0. Box 670 Upland, California 91786 Perfomm.ce Bond (Road) $148,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, walls and atreot signs 9 P a Cons ant Calendar - Release 3f Bonds August 15, 1979 Page 2 Tract 9305 - Release of Bonds (Ikps Located an the northeast corner of Amass. Avenue and Munte Vista OWNER: The Jones Cmpany 10945 South Street P.O. Box 1178 Cerritos, California 90701 Cash Staking Band 34,100 NOTE: The requirement of a Cash Band for the setting of final momments vas mads for Tract 9305. We have received Buff lcient Safo=ation to sub- stantiate the cmplianee with the bond require- ment Therefore the bond and fee can bs released Tract 9449 - Relense of Cash BorZ (Mqp ! m) Located on the southeast corner .,. Be n -ine and Ramona Avenue OWNER: Thmpson Associates Dnvelopsent Co P.O. Box 138 Carlsbad, California 92008 Cash Deposit $2,350 NOTE: The subject tract we constructed under the direction of Th. y4on Associates Develo mint Corp The County requested a cash deposit in the ®cunt of $2,350 for replaces ent of exittin3 improvements The deposit is now available for release ao the cmpany has fulfilled Its obligation The road bonds for the subject tract were released on March 7, 1979. Tract 9188 - Release of Bonds (m ' (mites N — ) Located on the north side of Arrow, R+ to west of Baker Avenue OWNER: Suncrest Ontario Company 1691 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 Labor and E'iterials Bond (Road) $16,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Water) $ 5,500 Labor and Materials Bond (Scutt) $ 6,000 (The roads were accepted by the City on 10/4/78) C Consent Calendar - Release of Bonds August 15, 1979 Page 3 • Tract 9518 - Release of Binds (Ow 7 —5) Located between Arrow Route and the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way wear of Biker Avernus OWNER: Suncrest Ontario Company 1691 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 Labor and Materials Bond (Road) $15,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Sever) S 5,500 Labor and Materials Bond (Water) $ 6,500 (The roads were accepted by the City on 10/4/78) Tract 9519 - Release of Boma (mes —1 Located on the south side of the Southern Pacific Railroad right of way, vest of Bake Avenue OU14ER: Suncrest Ontario Company 1691 Kettering Street Irvine, California 92714 Labor and Materials Bond (Road) $20,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Sever) $ 8,000 Labor and Materials Pond (Water) $ 6,000 (The roads were accepted by the Cit. on 70/4/78) Tract 9429 - Accept roads and release bond (Mfee UJ -0 located an the north side of 19th Street at Cartilla Aveme OWNER: Valle Verde Uevelopment Corporation 333 South Beverly Drive, 0708 Beverly 8L119, California 90212 Performance Bond (Road) $78,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved see being In accordance with the road improvement pLans and it Is recommended that the roads be accepted. The Improvements include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs Tract 9370 - Accept reeds and release bond (m4): Z -'Be) Located an the north side of 19th Street between 8wea Avenue and Benicia Street OWNER: Va!lc Verde Development Company 333 South Beverly Drive, #208 Beverly Hills, California 90212 • 1 Convent Calendar -Isla awe of Bonds August I5, 1979 P4&0 A Tract 9370 - (Coutfaned) Performance Food (Road) $56,000 N=: the rood construction has bem approved as being is accordance with the road improvement plans and it Is reroemended that LEO roads be accepted. The Improvements Include curb, gutter, psvirg, sidewalks, walls and street signs. TraC 9415 - lbelease of Bona, (jt,.?B• CC— DD) Located on the east tide of Archibald Avenue north of Artw Route OLSFi: Ceaemdal lbmes - Qhrmooga 13141 sixth street Chino. California 91710 Perfozmtoce Sod (Road) $70,000 Labor and Materials Sind (Road) $35,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Sever) $ 9.500 labor and Materials Bond (Water) $16.000 1 DM- The made were accepted by Council action on 8116/78. Sovever, at that time, the bonds were net released due to an oversight of the County. At the present time, it Is rectamedd that both the faithful perfotaance bode and the labor ad materials bonds be released as it has )em one year since the roads were accepted. Tract 9083.4 - s_'a3e of Bonds (" -Er-- - 'F Located south of Devon Street, west of Malachite C==.- John C. tiaers, Inc. 1450 r- Coolry Drive Coltoo, California 92324 rcvf —ance Bond (Road) $88,000 Labor sad Materials Bond (load) $44,000 Labor and Materials Bond (Water) 510.500 Labor and Materials Bond (Sewer) $14,000 %Vn: The roads were accepted by Cmncil action w 6/21/78 bum the mad bonds were not released. At this time performaace and labor and materials bode are eligible for release. JD • is If KA1U NcD.944 B nThaUaiat;arper al:ditrritaryolSr,a Ettacrdiao Ccaat),State of California "IND A SVEUIVRION W A rDRTIOR Or LO? Y SLOCR U,N]AVaNDA NOVESIEAO AS30CIAnp1. AS VIDRN Oq VAR RECORDED IN DODA S.rADE 46 Or NAPS IN TNL "ICE Or THE RECORDER OF SAW COUNTY LIND DNILLERUD. PC - SAN YARIRO•CALIlCR4IA P ti Au \!fj al.'.r Y /Tf� 14NACfGTaI4-TrJ U 1 .r•h.+- �J..I... e... .y.n.•�•c•.w.•r..r.T.I..arnwr r.+w r.....,., .. An. r...wvr....... /_.... r .•w.r.r wv.•• 4s w'w M1.•wrn"r•,•ru•• -Jr.r w - ' /\ A. walmaR *M+V ^fd�•.w`fr•6A �wn.wn "�i- �•wewr.. .. •....IA ev- ..-^r• L.V •rI ••E•.r.IMY Vr rM.•n r• •,F.•�.�r1.e"••4..nrrrr••rn"•Fn ♦hY f Nf'IY -N NneafM` Ns �.A=� •� •r .n= 'yr.Y.•••n n•w. •h•w "�II hN ^rr..ln•M .r 'fe•6 VAnIM � ^Nw rM•M Jtl.•�l��r`.1� . [rn.hY rHIJ!•.AwMr •4 .' 1.- .tlN.r9 W+wnY• '. M.Mw••..w•4 rM• r •r.•.h�. MI MSrN r1'.rI`4.rv1•w �••1y •M1•rw rAe4•N � \ti• wwr. bA.`• r "..V"•rr�.M.•4wV••.4slr•Y•Y•1 6N�.\•. rl.fY K -r[I f `b ••..• .Ir.rR•r �O •.Yr1 `•� V.Y MY /"r.Nw+ /.Ye.4\N • •- +.• /Y r NfLKCR CE6YCLOPYCNl LL1tI� e.&n.. •vw C1T •IY• ^iCNK � a r r I /n�- ^L t enrY•a A• +.n..w.. n N M •\.Nrw+•`r.wrr w.44.• y wn.mrf'r•••+ vrarr.rre..... rRV ✓n[A., ^w• •t �Y1.w.y N�wAy%.N�M1- .. -e.a:. Ir.. e•�werrr". Yw,\�•wI / r1 Ma+A..IM(n'.n•r n n'Aw . rti nrr • °..+.w•.rN.L[!1•�__ °..•er.,.'� ,:.A+iar.rt Cr•-t .. .n M,� A..•rs•rr:rrM1rrrr � •v IY w Y.4Y.'L e�G`CNl ,• N•ry w.A re. .� jr'd[ryrt�a�r ~ [(Ara• •'.<Y�41 ♦i.Y rYl -r. •.nn.w. wlr 4 .'4•Y ". .r.. \r'•'I M••"M •..9 r..'I .9r --r•V n. p•��Wwwf r. •1f• e\r � r frrtre -I M..r...rn•r..•E /f..a."n"•. .e • • r. wNw �-"r^/ . -+r •ry r•. r.. " rvr' tln • .".•S rVa• M1 •v : •/..Mn- Nn •-n iti r/•"•�[a-nr[sae-/ N -n-O.- �w"W..I.4r 6••.� ..Ai n•-Mn.•.n r�� �Yr ^•r-vn ••. er 4..ti.. ••Y 1`V nrei6r/[M ^`,•n,••`r.n "•f.•w.• � �".. ..r.. ..-• .r... -n.•• Ar.•w!N�n.. M.. � •W= lryu db__ Y vfrA1VY.[CLtt r,lN/ AjY� .... i Aer•f�w l . ___.f.4.4 ����,fC ���') e4M ..•e.r - +.ems •e... ^:.: 'i "e. "..r n 'W r"1n r.M.nr� ".rle.0 rv- r.r•-Mb• /.OAw•./ •buy ln.n.[r`w4.. .w O ✓�_ -- [h. S r Y....•....... 1 "P r..ir J Sn R,l w•P..wr Lnw•Inn nr.b ti4• wA..J' .reM •ry.ye,Y/4VrJSA. ICY rr [r•M1. r`n•.•,M4 •rr % V ~ �4JAN .Y.W. /tielra \nn•. d ylA...• Irlw+erw�.rn'/ rwl[ aa[ ..•..r.J n.w.�w.J L•. rr Ft•1r.!•wb �ry.•A+n..r.aa /r/ A4nV4A frl MlNAf Il'lA H.. A . t enrY•a A• +.n..w.. a — —•N-s SCALE 1'.,0' .\y I w C T ..5009448 y1L[l 2 O 3 !MEETS In Th3 ,1 III '11,�111111c{'cU)c //A�joreted YerriittVocyof San Bernardino ConntMtate of California DONC It D &PMON OF A ROUT ION 011 LOT ?.01 MIS. CUCANONDJ HOVE3T [AD 1 ASSOCIATION AS SHORN ON MAP RECORDED, IN 11009 {.MOB 6 011 MAPS IN IH[ OFFICE V THE RECORDER Or SAID COUNTY t ' U ; =1 LINO OMILLERYD. INC -319 YIRIMO.C1L111oRM11 hz.+Yi I . BANYAN sr[•err — .Jrn/.: /J a '1111 $ .v.rY.11L -- 1 •^ -s-Y n � _ t p vs• •'L... V .J E J3 I J, E i Ir r" pJ as a ,• ti r ; . t i JJ N'� —cs St��EE•c— • • N l a '91 i NaE •R /• Y ail � E A Y 4 110 / ✓a[r ✓ "a p/ J4.t lVq fl { �t •1\? J; Ww { Il l 1 7I.n�� 11i I/ 1 e ! Rx i� l It y IA ep J J+Y•w qAy •Il.yltl•./I\f / /✓.w. -� • �•.! �i A NINA/O /N I✓fNY✓6• .f{ J. �.,.n.n..- .✓ww... w wv JCJ4M.•NM .'MMA.n✓ w sYwl Alf.• <l -.v s r .wrG �w.wyyr.Y•IJM�br 3 _4.JIT _ �_.. Y. .�'• �.(iiw ru,�.r • I l Intl'hAnhec:porate UTitnt7of sari Bsrca:dioo J County'state of Califaroia SLNO A SDS:M1310N CIA rONT10NOT LOT T.SLOCN ". CYCAU011DA NOYCST [AD AbDCUnON AL .IN)NN ON YAr NLCCADLD IN SDON rAlt 4100 YYf, N TK o"C' or TNL MCCONDU DI SA10 COUNTY ' UND o NtLLCNOD NC -SAN YANINO,CAU(OIINIA JJ I JJ re y3 ^9 -BAH ✓ -- III/ -.�� I •. ..� 1` '. ',� +_ nPV VIM KICAI T 1. to W .H`• Y I i a IJr Y.V Y.Y Y♦ rr i N - ni••7__ T -- ri.. l— n.... Y� I, TO .! V2l p � .: /r• I . L 1 N } wrw vtuviv - + T�'�itN `. •LI •f• 1 a •1 D� � s m Z ' TRACT NQ, 9322 1. 1.1 c00.I1 0r 1l. SL 1. 1 101.0 KIM 1 SM'ISM a S SPI IM V LOi I lal 1! aUIOG •015no I ,U,t IP .S RUM M I= S a mm pia 16 R m V 1.1 ca.rr, a Su St1,•IODA Sllk a MV 11 VMS aRVk.R rx ^^..'vrM��..m�>• . C�Lj1 ...^..ter .i' -... IsV e. [.I IIOI.Y 13 •ml, .. ... MIVHIro ��) 1I Vr�wr.r:'P=���t� off i .'ryr 51 w q.l U.Il1LT.j{QI(.r •.'...�l..a jlyjyiLj/ ll.Ir O. w.Ilpinl. 3 f .•I. a U h..N.. ,�..r �� �. :s : ;— ...... 1�.v.V FIHIP e F1I SI.MR➢S alIVkln aVfrl SLM.S i 1i1VkrR Ia1rtuU au ❑kltt •n �r u.wr S.III I Or a {X1111 AISOCI1110 ,.01.11x, 1.IY9.0 ".0 • n .i t .r.e.� e; "11M S aauttoL -6111 u 1[xa o vnnlrylS mnnun x.71.: �'^� p-:•'_ 'X 61 L M;. w Ixlrt or • t.1911 TRACT NO. 9322 IssociIIl1 Ix11.11.1 1. IMI CCUa I1 0 IIr 311\110110 gaup, alaou.• w1G 1 $tmll'S:M a 1 M'SM a @1 . Rat .. gfWXA W4 S�ni II3a1111M IS ncmu M"I a mm PACE K .raAY a x1 cC�tr CF sw zt w m $till a cuamu u ° /TI. 5.13 nt" i � ��'w.''r•I LINAx3 I � wV.MrMrl 1y 1 � _ I � I r i �:- - L W:•35 /? 1 __ _.ten...... lw. Z T I L Cxrl 1. ry! /IMI( %q N!lyly0 IY /.W! C. blYnR! / .YII) _LE I,1 �E l r � .wrlr//r!. w•n. r Y. nn Y3r7 /...a •l.vn nrl p3i/— _;f y.b.YN1 I..�if TRACT NO. 9322 IN T"t tOV.lr Or Sal SltTat"I.O ec114. v90nu", a Fal ONa Tr+. Rml.• RtYj MOON AW.U1121 It «totio p tad t v Mrs na .1 ITT= v I't Tax., OF tai alVIDOO surf OF tutrMIS t bl. `r•.0 SKIT S Or i mmano tr4.Rt.S OM ARID. C W FOAMA • TrVcT NO 'n70 /"",,. ".'w r ."•..sa'r VMIHE STREET _ VIAI SERENA u y I rI I n u sni .. 1111n n 223 •,. I.J I IA .. I •- • - '!ORANGE_-= a= _�_,}jrR -- ��= STREET ?1�• a ... 1 ^- { :. 69 66 y 67 66 t 66 �� 64 63 tj 1 I••I�n h _11:•t �T l- N —T 1a. .11_J're I -- OFF 8 17 20 Air 1rII — � I Tr IF a 9 16 _ a A W � 1• �. .r I ) ¢ 10 IS S 22 � �• �••-w• 1 7 L p e T i 1 a n n 1 I.I �n.t -va �Ti. v'— nl• 1 R - ��•L +a • 1 I j6 �l 2 11 rl• 14 a 23 •r . Ar. -.tai � J '7.'^ —. _��. I YJ •��• 1 - .r{.' {w ./�_},s,_ za 1 nlrrl � v F nln I hl WRAC i NO. 4322 SKtT . w- 1 N 1 4 1 t o u I I of SA. o r t" 1 1 o 1 1 0 ASSCC1ato f N0Ndp1s LRG 1 SWOIIisiN w 1 NXIIN R tof . Isf(r M nta.,q m11NM ONTUp CLLIIONna ISSMIAIIN At IECMXC IN 11 s A N #N; K a(ans If M Cohn V sm BO ry S1IN T :4lfat•11 ■ TRACT SARD STREI 43 1rl n tie• �- t-- - ORANGE � a a No CAMEO STREET P / •1 !•. I 1 n'In• I 30 � 29 1�• IB �, 7989 y. I 63 !; 67 61 1 d1 99 A F• 61 f' S6 55 •• ' •• —�: laN_ tac L 19 .• —v h'__" I•� "�v :! I,.� •�ti �� v 'IaT 30 54 31 t �' `tai @ ? q . •, t 4' r 29 �, \ y 32 AI .� ,: AE n E a N O l S3 1' w to 33 4 40 \ W 52 5 a i • 27 34 33 8 Y la 4, 51 26 Y ° 4 35 de 38 `°" —r Q 50 1 • «u `r. ..�.,. I � s 11twv °_ o�w L l� �. `� m.�l' I N- I � 25 36 31 I � 48 b 43 .r Ya i♦ w./SLn/e/lwl. }Ii i' •.1N 9 1 1 � � 7;D• avENUE ,,... wp E7c6 �G'.F'J D'o!. � rE Z If' •E.,: 2E'I'= L lE5 1 ).�� W. S .4 I o4 Ile n . � "'' .1t fy y1N1M •.. .. Ml1V1J y _ y _ �s 1c. ._ � �-r,,: �.�_�__.,_.._ ^.�— .--- ._,_, -'.• ti-• i, CIS • •: ~ ^•y ll• {a . 71j ,1���•�!`�i .�~'uaw'ir -I� tN i� �I_ •;•iii:. � ! '^ i` °'. ,� _ - b� . I _ a_ 7i' •i - -aS de �, .,�6 • °� I! �i•oil'.I I7� i 111 � � � rJ •', lt ° �; '• Zi ••:+" "•� cif ::'• ®• ,j =:=• I .. :_ - _ i _, a :' `! T • py! I� I _ er {•L j: (a .'..1 iil w,y == f y h `l I. CD �{ • t ' 9 i ay . t �. I I s � y r •�9 S, > � v; i, e..n44 --o-., err.. y� y j y 1 it ' � •. �. i v "i.:: - !' rw. —1 S �` !? : . 1 ; a v 1. •I' -''•r: to�j .. ` ..I•- _, t. :Uj ° jl= IP.L` I /,P .tvai; a _ • y1•? s j rirWWAY .t I vo ` {Er_ , zz� e 4 It o sit I 'c,'w 6016 •cry »VIII _ 1 �_�.��. � giTi,�i. j�3i #�I'�r J± i�i �jS�t �7•• ' r +T�l; ('': ��: � 'rt i IS If X11 �(•• r � }�,• ; 7 .�. '; Si; �t •{ i�li.: 3 {it l�il.•�i•ti � •t }•1. ,a # °t s >a,.; �'� v `Tj �: .'f�lt •�: .; +1s /!i'J;r'•+- r! >IT�1�:r D I \ `�j t amv,r�A'`••� —_. a'a�sa «.a g, I i FrT Io It 04 '` � ;L to : i •v. na♦. 'o-rt1, ,. H, �..p •,fu ♦ .. "a Z" �- i �• 1 a:,r .t � fF .R a `Re T n . /��•• et !.r 5 �5 1`J� 3f6 \.. '<irL i L ♦I °" tt a ,L`!:: «T., iaa.:, °, t�; T: t 3 -. .:,. •• »,I• . ��' ..- rig : fill, •i vt � � ; cy.. )% " =; i i!i. ^ a I • m � � •°-, rt I :iii' '� ' uz—�. ` S. ` tVt L I� - JY r •i- if '• '•'• •• - �( ti •' I• ! A, ' .... :1, 4 W ♦ u 7 S�ILd .. ., ..... •.. r11 •4I l L Awel_. «-I• 91 a � J••1 - °�fr L• • .qM .• �v J1'X• �+� ,��� I J'• I Z yi; 1 Z � ' —. Av..^t� •r z:r.•._ _ "-TrrDi � r ' t LI � �} ,�> t'+ r av \} I t `I'•L I"\ . Sj q. t1 ,a N ,i • <Y V •tal 1 •«., 1 \ - +,1 ^tr !r• !i P�; it 4,a �4 I /�af_I �i•t�"'. 00 t �1W I[„�•JF • •� j ' "• rti ` „I Irl •I.q .r+I7I ha .1 It L .r ; ``�'�• ,J,( - jr �t�+�— ��•_,��LI�t^ p'I - \ Vim•- -� 4 111 L' : �s :> ___:� arr. v.v ameT.asB �L_�J/ �� -+ •'• Z 1 ( •' Tat vi , •� .:T: A '�:. t. ,..♦ � • � j _ 1.A s � ()�'�< <.t�y1 t L .� o (t,1' ♦ /p/'.1/ /�' D �1te ,vigil � �' .o/i ,tr��r fi r �Ft+tt -� I`! }�I�(Ial�xt�•.. • y,1 • � l'�..1 ri •'a r1 �,. C�'� `r •, Its, 11' '� ,i OJ �� f/ it yl•l. y.t �j• � T• THOM ON ASSMATEj Phono 714.729.7931 Carlsb d califomia 92M 0 E 1J M P M E N T UP. fl P. • July 9, 1979 ";1 KPr. 17. Lloyd B. ebbs All City of Rancho Cucamonga : SNr�1Ud11L'111 1�1.1151G Rancho , CA 91730 8 Subjac :cCesh Bond for develo;,,at of Teak Ave., Tract 9449 �� Apr -lion, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dear Hr. Hubba t In early January this year ve agreed to let the subject eaah bond sit for the time being as afesult of the Courtnr•s Position around drainage. We are now in the process of liquidating our company under vhlch this Tract was built and are anxious to get the out- standing slattern on its books closed. It will be appreciated if you can have the files oar this Particular item reviewed and the bond placed in 11:e for refund. For your convenience we enclose tLa foLlovind reference material i I. Xerox copy of check dated Oct. 4, 1977 depositing +2,350 vitb the County. 2. copy or our letter to you dated January 31, 1979. 3. Copy of city o: Rancho cucaaonga Letter dated March 8, 1979 releasing the Toads bond. Many thanks for your help in thin regard. Most Si y .E. ttarpcy !co Pra. i ed nt meh cc Harold Thompson — x, Binders ofBris Cffda Homes • • J t 4 Li .. < ..,... THOMPSON ASSOCIATES 1790 • ••pw DEVELOPMENT CORFORAT'<ON P. O. BOX 338 1646//120 CARD% 0. CA 92M ' Octobcr 4. 1977 PAY, County of San Bernardino $ 2350.00 S =. T•+enty Ttr,,a Rundgd and Fifty ------ - - -xx/ DOLLARS I. I SANK01FAM!_RICA MN F < - RIO-) ! ^rOr 1:1220M0ii661: Or. 2BB- 002660 +00000 2 3 50001' 0 9 'T"' . _. . n ? TOT: -' -- I t3.rYd iJ ab': •'r! �i j7 n G � � Iii V 7 • 0 �i j7 n ,EPSON RSSGCIAM Phone 714.720.7991 P. U. flax 00C E E Caatbad. Udom a 92003 January 31, 1979 ,IENT MR e Mr. Lloyd D. Mbbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucaroaga Rancho Cucaconga, CA 91730 Subject : Rebuild wail on T:sner Avenue, Zact of Iraavood Straot Tract 9449, Rancho Cucaconza, Dear Mr. Sabha : Az agreed in our meting in your office an January • 5 last, we bad our enaiaeer draw a plan for the repair of the subject wall which after Clear alterations was approved by your office. Porold Tbanpson and I are pleased to report that the wail and apron on the vest side of the wall repair were =21eted yesterday by Alan M. Bean G Soaa. 'O trust that you are near in s position to have the general ieprovezent buds for this Tract released. please tie us in with a copy of your release to the bonding coapagy. Ile fW per agreed to let the coca boy for the future icprov. =t of Teak Ave., "aMusily accwpliabed" sit fa. the ti:.e being. ao appreciate very cch the good help and co- o?eraLioa of ryou and your staff in th/r��f i/ ✓ �` .. ier, Yiea cadent ce arold 4B=—.,son -Ens Vegas DwWorr a :ass Undo m or L a CO6��b W m• QO �s �3 a h= >S�m3 V O� s of aY s z ai�zl b g4a.. g WIT A' �aoh�i�•�1� 1���i,1; i �y��`o))�3yyyyyyiaX. � r�49i�p 6 >y � 56o az..a g o •a spad t b'N �3 �e J 1 W �dl•31i; � iaitt�. i i W U 6 a W � u N t... 6 �Mj a7� .- - • W W 3 S U W �y, ,a a 6 W nI Q�d�! I LLlih tl1 � lo 0 �3t � Hsi dj[ i:�• ZC t ie o �i ,a i I.� 1 31 1' t' O2 J, ti• i \ l� nI Q�d�! I LLlih tl1 � lo 0 �3t � Hsi dj[ i:�• ZC t ie o �i ,a i I.� 1 31 1' t' O2 J, ti• i \ \I rxAu i IN V. y I tsb ([IM A SOSOINISION 0( A 1pNTWN OF LOT N OF S(C +ION S. 10Y r1yA0 I WJM, 9iN:{ 1YCSl, SAN B(NN1i01N0 NUIp1N " M( C 11 OF SAN DIANANDN S'A'E 01 CALIfOMNY, AS SNOYN ON 'K "P OF CNCAWWM LO S AS KN NV MECOAOCO N BOON A OF MAM /AO( A N WE OFFICE 01 Tr COI Ty RECORDER 01 SAID COUNTY THOMAS O WCUTCNAN NCE SS90 BOUNDARY MAP ,I. tE iN q" .4NlJ ! JYV v /wll.a Jr .-r.A•pw•MJrw /I'wr✓ /Y+•V v s/Jri y/...++rm- .l.rwrlrr lazes Jl! 1(sf+ AYJ!}V rO.+AAIw1 wr .v wvr ! • n'AY ✓J +•r / •!/ AI !ww JiYLVeo !+[y yp (.M1y.. ..S*rii sv 1Y.a �wr.wvlw.rnrwvi �(rrw.A• cwcv /Y+HI�fN•IIWO IO /1tlMMXJ JM)/ %/ r'lIW1 AItyJ ITy1 ]I. // /s!r Fri o•!we /lolw•a rlr av�. +./.warlw<unwle sowJS A.�nrwvo/.IVro • sryls Yv+olsls rY.r •.v Aro .wJ/ra re<+wo w/ <w • JM «W!M✓ WiAI MJ Farr /✓!.W/ M.tM.Y • JNYTIri e.1i•!s/ I.wvrw+✓ /w.ro • / 0 'M'� N I �'MW' «sJ JYb wi wf .Fww1v « JNViY/! h _• ` r M1 JCIYpYI! M lty F!y/ I/ /A!O M' JM M/N yyp� . r nw c]A1u•Ji J.Ie.vn.e _ 2 .jGJ% i'r.Iw raAwrr s+ww•J ,gYgVMyy wifr ie« 4 'J rr! l.ew1✓ /J parnwo Jrsslly tnv A .T•: L:C'•JJ. ?s. i 9i.. wgry Jn osclu w • 11 A 11 tE iN q" .4NlJ ! JYV v /wll.a Jr .-r.A•pw•MJrw /I'wr✓ /Y+•V v s/Jri y/...++rm- .l.rwrlrr lazes Jl! 1(sf+ AYJ!}V rO.+AAIw1 wr .v wvr ! • n'AY ✓J +•r / •!/ AI !ww JiYLVeo !+[y yp (.M1y.. ..S*rii sv 1Y.a �wr.wvlw.rnrwvi �(rrw.A• cwcv /Y+HI�fN•IIWO IO /1tlMMXJ JM)/ %/ r'lIW1 AItyJ ITy1 ]I. // /s!r Fri o•!we /lolw•a rlr av�. +./.warlw<unwle sowJS A.�nrwvo/.IVro • sryls Yv+olsls rY.r •.v Aro .wJ/ra re<+wo w/ <w • JM «W!M✓ WiAI MJ Farr /✓!.W/ M.tM.Y • JNYTIri e.1i•!s/ I.wvrw+✓ /w.ro • / 0 'M'� N I �'MW' «sJ JYb wi wf .Fww1v « JNViY/! h _• ` r M1 JCIYpYI! M lty F!y/ I/ /A!O M' JM M/N yyp� . r nw c]A1u•Ji J.Ie.vn.e _ 2 .jGJ% i'r.Iw raAwrr s+ww•J ,gYgVMyy wifr ie« 4 'J rr! l.ew1✓ /J parnwo Jrsslly tnv A .T•: L:C'•JJ. ?s. i 9i.. wgry Jn osclu w • TRACT N0. 9188 ' W DCrq • WIDIVISION Or ♦ a t,04 Or LOt u V SCCT.Wl 9 I•\rf.�aa I XUM OF ) M1ST, LN DC\IWDIND N(PIpfN, W MC COIIII> Di S41 !C rW9DNq • SiLIC W CWfdIN p• q SIpN y1 MF WV OF CUUYpIG L'N b Kr WV PCC09pC0 W DOOK • OF W S hGC 9. W THE OrrICC 01 t E CWNt• RCCONTI6 S 0 CWNII Dq S 0 WCUICNON RCC 9090 tz tl ���f ,IAN •V /M S . -tl >t7.I:r,•,F�r. -/_ ,N,.� ,Nri n ... 'Nw —iiro � { b ivy :Ir� i ,1 �`a ♦ ♦j \ �/, •p'• a• uN,• �!>9 1l 9 A env.. -� —_— __ i ::ar5 • J • / X V j O ♦ 3 W 2 I� ° Y r. � � ' ♦ i h a � N Y f � aN a ♦a � Y d•Y „•r IJVi J•r C ♦ 3 tl d ,mot: i ay j y� I• Y � r.r a.J fi”! J %IJ— Ilaw ✓��4aW /1 � .MV •�f.n"N���TI,/� a Y �— /MY I•M � P•N . i L•'r4y . i•r: liiaip 00 LLO 0) e a cr- H JI z oari Z y;a 3 +go O ig +u Y s a� 3au u :8a y, W zd3rQ�; lD W a u V 6 W u r; 0 to 1 12 ° V 3, >j 3 \ :$ } 1 1 1 tiiY 3 W ° W \\ u IO i 0 :a i 12 ,�% W s m?i�Qwit i3:y }:eQ �; ct } ft Z d is D a � •a e t�3 e� �r ��21e pp_ +y+� u sag Q a it! ie k } 1 1 1 tiiY 3 W ° W \\ u IO i 0 :a i 12 ,�% W s m?i�Qwit i3:y }:eQ �; ct } ft Z d is D a � •a e t�3 e� �r ��21e pp_ TRACT N0. 9518 ' e[l.k P xV6DfnxwN or a 10111wN a Lon 0 iui (ONII�LCCI s V erM�1LN01W 61A:t PLNGC iYC31, SLY [LPWPOINO NCPwlb4. �N Or CLU /OPY.L LS 9.Obil CN 1NC YlPO COUVO x44 lLND2 Lf lP wv PLCO Cw. N 000P L OI MLPS PLGC N 1NE OFIKC W INC LpNt♦ PICOPD[w 01 SLO COVNIi 1 1101L3 O YrNICNLN "CC 96" BOUNDARY MAP i i IL/°iI ' D jf 50- j d fit' �•E w �•C�C � e1MI U Ij t i J4[Yj t M=1 /!/oiwN/+v.w rywTlY.,r l✓I^ /!!/...+'.r ,war / / / !.i.l,• �1>I �^ %Yas.wrM'YO pJMr/ lINI YJ t L lPy, qv lll'l�^µwsl nY .M /I�� t •J • • a. JKI %J M^ / •/I M' !MV AM'✓O KI Y)O ( ✓✓'�' \ 1 / IW !!J(1lIN /N•lhYf ✓O AW✓+r�' /1.•A ^•V✓ ' IO .NriVVVf Jll Yi/ /I,VV IMf✓o I.Y fVlr Ol ,J /L �" J Ks if // d!w•V L/aWe IfI /Il! Jl!!/f MffLY.Y4 N,•, nW!/J y/IwOO�M✓YD/ I f!/ swYJIf Y.Y /M i e r/ArIS /M >Jlo /! /v!O v-- • /t✓ /Ib /lMAI.uY ✓frf 11 ll�/ >w'lrn0' NRMVI ld Ja lJ ln'rlA p.WW1M /W!/. -i.., -� •1. �Y �.♦��•v�1•L'1Q /W.W/IJ•IYMWNIJ IMO aY °.IJYf�'✓I✓JJ•tAtY/ �• ! T'.' j _��jJ ecP1,;'i�' p•/w> JF✓+xYe N/Jll rrl r/•RYro /••a✓.wiy�^ '_r�c.,•`\w � }P.f_'B ° "+- - _ ?.:�'. ! �!J /I Hu NUJ tla./f J✓rwhY) lria J/V`Y �{ / ■ MAUI I IVV VJIU fY .lelluOrpl.(11. . wK tdMli p f M �lS� � S �.l pnJI.IPM1� N19K7M Cw lYf 9C 1 • {r.c +ulr�d 14D Cpnl�`n• YV I4CdrC(0 n .1Y , O/ YUS 1Gf f +� rY' t< W iK <dl.r PCYU 6 YIdIK•SM SCl USO / 1 y / ; L Is C l 1� r• < AR / IA NN /per ; i x'- lE ;;— :.x ' n • a:t� � /riror l u l s a � • ro a y \ tt ���qy I � /W.U•r _ —L.A1• 1.• e TRACT N0. 9519 ' BC ENO • • RANO! nYJ 04 n .11 A TEM" ! T tIP vI ,. a SNTaE uUIMAx M MC tpA ++ n f.Y elYwepNq S+AI[ n CALYO "MA, AS •J W W IeK YAP 01 CULSYONO4 SMOS AS RP YAP A[CON0E0 N e t a MAPS PARE f. W M[ WILE n TN! CQVa" MECORSCM OF SAO COUIIR IMMAS 0 Mt CUTCMAN ACC 1590 M NryLIK MI P,V M♦•.[A•J[( AA'O .y /aW[ /NN.ry JAr lKdn nXl w.Y! /J /NJaY I.Lan JwA♦• • pI.WKOV [w(/ /n i(__ Jl/_A JA/ lW w" m.t[V ll.a tYaur JpP ngfKWl /.l J A•I ! AVO Ia'J 'Jj J l 1'f• /•NJ /•YY AYt1YJJN WpVYn 4. /N•W •a •c/lYnJnYA.�/r[rirl./er /A•lrmroJnwmJAtr ^I h'lVOY 4Wi Iif Ngl.Jl In I fCC•tYY /<l .rJ- � m.♦oTif T /J[YJJ faeaV lO/J � •a •AVo r nrYJay.rArJ p AY!/!Ar /wY mrsi •A•wepa /»a • JN/Ar�.d, A +n AfJrllPW wr,//YJYr[.tal r J Jn./iAap lafwyy d»Y Awn wal Jwn AfJW) v.. [rn✓ca•r m•rm rAeL/aan «m!•AWaar Ja of NJl W.•JM (n[MV✓ J•yyV / ✓INPiafr (� • fll.a'ipMp nlMVM/.Oa;I(Y•W+SaaN [IMVRIIdIY j•FfAf r Qti !',,����� ngvvYll fnryy J fH.l� 1 J/S •�aaFG.Z.: NOTARY ACKNOWLEOGEMEN. lVY '•/I.ANYiJ - /l.nsF �J• QAnLi 'cacY- oslaN /w ><: vwS /�i'o :v:%- Jwr•Afr /era.: wJtn -wt ✓+cwY J.Y IJ O( Y �:I( {'f!J_ • [a��,f, [�l11/(/ IT arw,V Rv ' ' N •r Fl[ si /IMt4• �t1 rt[.W A „e�•�♦•'M•Y a[fYa i•.tY •SJNIW /Y /_• JrnY IH[i:VO // J -,• •arm aYY/•w /!ru /Nyr[n♦Ynwf /+or lcao ['a -••. •+pY fAaV faarwwl NN /lpapm WAtl•a[tA RVIJawe♦rnrw••oY� WNV vrn+RT .aV/JfT. a-> a • va a.• tY \YJ.ta 41ti1all �Yn .9 V• /V /Rq /a /•nDYa AI ILaY WR.apnLraY! /.[p IIAM/gYR �w.. ••J•a•a..J w.TVY e+fiJaw n+r.w.Eri a/1 I•F JF /YN• wall♦ N wM Jan {jjjPVaY.aa[y.4 �FY - L�rt♦rL 1 ��11 . •..w Ml .GC/P//�� •awA+Ywi N ,,• •••• ,• JJ,4 CLW Vi J.fRO N N•-av / /wWnAYC•1 .ZJ. -• ..�u BOAPP OF SUPERVISORS CERTIFICATE n n�•f.•. i Jiw LlA.pw(W Rw r/_ • a •�ry /v(LPJro AYn /Xro w i .w/ /m o r ta•)av 49rJ CfV /fgY.0.•r.4W pJ.Hf.NMb J %LY •• •J..a /L1CaJL.tMaJ [NiVIY.•ay.Wa /NA(L 1M •Y ALI V ✓l.a� /J, faX(K /IO JJ !! v♦IY.t'M wf ••a• tY N vW J >.aO r /aY Lw•tY /O a[u w. /w Jra• (•ka ♦ ryf. /VyY J[y a •Y� JN J/ JJb Mfytry ' ✓.•A a.•IILY N.nf•Y O. SaY �!O!K /• a .a �/JnwXeJ al J♦•N+Y/m A.aX�J+n .. v.a +r + /i, A.Yp J•Ya Lwo wY /s+aw•aafrATn.ro ENGINEERS CERTIFICATE / .ataV •1 I V. fl.f ••� -%Nri M / /•ry I fly. NllJ .taay ltOr Y!! MJS /J NfiL.vNV I L nt/ ✓v[paY YW M['teY /J./!7' a J/r'Y l n AfrVTlP /!Ml�O•VN•.`{•Vd LAAYY •v4Yf a•YY /w fi�•A -a pVfa( / / /�Y M. /wC: f J n [\t .•!� _� •r•a •aY L[/a IV Ia f! N (•• n .fl♦ Iwa • aaa.V qa• lf:.•r•Y/ V .M [l •l •I •a tYa••Y Jaat• n /a �•.•Aa L [f /.• , AaV LLI•I M h•J•C.av'•.pY y[•• i••fa »Jry ✓I' •a J [irr / [n � .Yi sr• X.ws roN /! PI //a NJg7 %Oa »r [p Vwy! /wV J /A'v COUNTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE /Yw a +/ n•• /m !.• /wYxwiJ.9' »- ..an gar �l• ✓. }.ar/ NM• 4 I l ♦ r Yr.•JaJ f♦frty va /wJ•r /.o•rN. +n fA y.n:r J•.r c:•. ffrJV Ya va e♦ I• • I♦v J4.J /YJ /a J/ .vaa/ A♦•r amp IE.T•.ri N/ fws'• -» AAYI� AUDITORS CERTIFICATE J.r/rov arlaY. .a/ -Aw.v aJ > v.Y.. w J. s.r♦ din A ..• w.♦•r .r•n M1A r <'..... •aa/l AV` f�7 •av •J •�((Cl %IJM•TFVt .JJlyK•aJw MIV•••L!J••uu ±yf AA• /.27[F IL avPJn El qp .r`w r.a. a.•c m. -. .. evAr fY4aC• aVYa •♦ /faLf'Nan ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE •N Y \w �.n .• ♦.r./ff� fY.IY 'lV\ wa\' ViYNVwrra \Y \t i• riYara..w.- +,itw• +J••...w • nt..Y. f. lc/.. a.a•.w. M1I/iy.Y AY<fpy✓1•I J JWMftYM N{A,VIa•.V ap rI•A ��ET 1 �� rr/.r r/'V J.V. '°.JYT•n''r°l•J � \ 5� / SIGNATURE OMISSIONS c• w[yw..rY mJaYarr•.wn.tn 7 N• •. A•.MY'f ••v MY/✓ %111 If NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ♦E��t �)(i.n- :SVib�ti_ar. [- �� /•''(�)X[.yC*[�(M♦Ks 1L/ w�iAl/M•rV/Vw•N�•nI ♦.lYlJ l4 na--S. iV YJ eV,- •w,�• %V•.Yawrl M•Ilmina•TYJAJI- V •VA)KJ sr 1 r.vyy M♦V �+wv[J mJ4sMTwJ)aa•Y0 .'M•' t \..a1M.tVN \aar liAI YQ NJ a \•A'e[Y.aV YX1f :t •r[•'M1aV .♦:M Nr�Yi.•��� vYU .•TJaO • •♦ynY �•b }• •N fvi ♦♦tau w• ,♦. T »Y va. w f y `Wq•Y iN V ••'IVYJUa ,u u1 •vw J•J V Ya • ♦I•• V \•v .• •••• Nr•/f•uur•fwYY t0A 4/l•u. •rA•T�• af.f Javnr, M M1 Y •Y:♦ J M v,NYla,rMw '^a•J»• \l�f••YA /taA�♦.vv e V•l1J.Y �♦a Ai /a �NnO••�tiga vO•n ^ Y -.Wn •a•Y V• -M /.,ta rlvYJY +�Y.aV�Yli•9 rWVa[V w-'dr lJ.a «.atiai al J+a.wna.c.wwi iw.+.[r 29 ; TRACT N0. 9519 sCIX6 AleanSlpX or WIITCN V lQls C RND C a , of U 0TO /N4Nr 1 SOUTH, B1XOC 1eLT SINBUNS[OINO1•CITIDON, T MC CWMT 01 UN B[IIIYITIIq. ]Tq[ M C4vom.. RS YNN.N W TN[ YY V CLC�NON[A LY S Al CN NII RECORDED TN BDON R O MAM RRC[ S. IN M OMCE OF !NF COVNTI RECORDER OF ]RID COUNTY TNOYSS 0 YSCUTCNRN RC[ SSSO BOUNDARY MAP y, 2 � T • iit z•=' 'O' 1 a .vi /lJ /•n� r w•o-n•.r n.+r ..r NI•.0 wrwi w�.e ././N% �/ I.N.✓ M' wfvq N RNV. IJ ! / /Il e••/ I. rlWllJ .'M.V /V J /HMO Jl n.Y/O / e wV ✓I/Il Jr-� /�./ M' fM. 1I1.1V1/ if/ MIO � ✓H� w /�v /N'/✓tN'J mwrrwwi w.rnwvrr /.O frww.NS /.wvo Ie tnTY /.'f O /!/I N'!fv p.RVO ICI NlI f J/ /Ij' // � !.W IAICeO Ip •YN I /IKM lwfWeVlJ •\V/Jl MM /nMMIMIO N•M.f.Y RO .W IJ Ir! IIN M /MN I�tlI JM.. NJGV IN 1... /.f eV 1. /Y •.� M.I/ lv J+Y.r..wn0 avrl•wN� eerry _ T 4yr J 0 N.IWIJJ / ✓hMWMJ ArO M Y l•w••� N /YM1YfJ Y I..IJ JMNY! Y .rJ A'Nf M RYIV MI.► IMrV V A1Y I1Y/7 .I4./'JA..f - -,JI- /:I rM(.N J.l ewvi✓+s+.+an. iY ..HO O/wr� • I 011A /G 'C' J•J 011A /G :I' • I r snrw' ,1 bv-ri Ali KAt, i ivv. yZ) iy n:xitPT+�t• "iiri °w•iu♦o T�ro o,:n N ♦M[ COU11Y �d'SdV VEA-10 BOOM i 0 "Y SME P W M[C d"WME a♦�}K01CWNTl"'ico"Em SAIO CCLAOlw� TNOW30�MeWCN ♦N ACC 150 Y >, a a \ as z 1414 i w iw/ os .♦o • /N!' /N Y a TRACT Na 9429 IN THE WNCOPPORATEO TERRITORY Of TNC COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO UNO A SUBOVRNW OF A PORT ON a TMC N. V 2 Or TkE nL W, KG DD. T-W..ILTM.,S.BIL PER OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF DATED AUGUST 92.1574. AM A POATIOM Of LOT E. 1RDIwN111 TRUST IUNO ASSOCIATION. PER NAP RECORDED BI BOOR t0. PAGE TS OF NAPS. ALL RECORDS Of THE COUNTY Of SAN BERHARCM. STATE Or CALIFORNIA. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Y tf 7RDf. 1T0. I(p.TrfD PIR /AERSIDP /er/ /N a/ YI((f YLROL O[VLIOPA/fNLNl CORP, / flMPopi1JG5' wl�� Knri/w4 Alwrwsq r . w. a nr r/f . h• /wI NOTART 1CNMOMLLOGNET(f J•ITf C/ f4 /HW ♦ w(%� /� �re wiFf fow (.m ffw. �i.f � /TrAIIJrRY II f rI.)/I %If 4C!(� f1 I Ij%• /I. IYf / /I/ei(T /rT>n/!f I� /f. •/O /•I.Yq r /.b.rlrl NO rqM If Yf II// IYf I /w / /./ .M /I(f// /I lYI YslwlvT /IrN..y/OY e(.I✓ // Nro (s.f�iiJu': ri�iYw w✓ i/� �e /iW v � uhf y� fr. Yiwrww fo rrr sfrr tirlwlwfnwNr/sm Y /.f(/ Y/ NYO fO lflNYl /fI{ .Y I r wY nu wrI /flw Yf4r ! /IUIf /� IIi /-wa Zlf. ENDINEEWS CERTIFICATE /frVr A/^I(w II.MI M1,I.fr/ NM/fvfey IHrvI /If yrYl/ /(yWW r./ M i/ ti. Fr +Ay � /MI rMrA1r f Iy Mw+.vr //RI rlYrFw W 111 )Sr AY /'.'Jw.I .nR N1N JNf. /w.r/�r /rI w.NMrV A. /r ! %/f. r r.- wl.wv.W .4Aw N /Klilrp NwV CCUNTT SURVETOR•S CERTIFICATE MrJrf M/rw.rs Fv AM.•wr fpf M wV n.y VGA r.f /w rN.fr/ wr/ M, nwMr .Mr J.LrG !/ 4-41 ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE /� I1Yw. �N ln. • • M ruf.Y Mr R /(rfe•1I rIw ,'! i.f'(• N /..I. fi.'. /r fIIMGI /f/ 11 11/!11 AVOtOR'3 GRttiICA/E INwj TiP Mr. /ry .Y M.KYN MYS� n.! !I N4 IM Ar Anv .yw.r.J M w 1•^w"F .Y•• .r q rrw/�rwr•rrJ /wCwN .i ..w'�a.1 [^MfruwN Yr1I. //'uM' whK� FN f1h. M... IA.N .lsM N. /A'!rr gr5•Ar.4 lwYr5'/ ' < qr 6 BORRO Or SUPERVISONS CERTIFICATE 1/✓ A•n, JFN N^l l+++IN r Mu1 r ✓M..wv1 M/rfrnel 1.1N /NF N1N rtN N M M1r /M /Ay F NrNN�� w(Arf lhrsrw+M .Pr +i! nM1rQ JAr wwfl/w ✓/vw. aY Nllenrf/ wl/ W� ^_'�Y f 1„..d��_A �. TRACT W. J'�� N THE UNINCC RPOR l 1ERAITOMY M COLNTY of SCRR 0OF i`aP I BEING A AIBOMSION OFA PORTION OF THEN I12 OR THE RCYA.SEC. SS. TIN, ,?W. S.B.Y. PEA OFFICIAL RAT THEREOF GATED AUGUST 12. UTA, AND A PORTION OF LOT 2. PR0H3IT10N TRYST FUND ASSOWTUN PER YAP RECCRDEO N BOOR S. PAGE TS OF MAPS, ALL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARONO. STATE OF CALiORNL, ROYEUSER. NTS e PACE ERGIIFERNO INC •/N+w /s y nr . •v waw Mwd/d A.. .Nd/w,N �rwwrrir Srw/ r• %/ v:r wr , c/r wv/ ar wp i• //u Ns/rnrrN••r /// • , A ✓fA•UC } LyAL� rrmn• S n1KMUN0 I /.dam tq I i a a d 0 i a I W O i� a i 1� r• � � 'r II• I _ . r i`aP I I a I }I I de/ � • ; / /4'LM AYLNpI i 1 IL .rru•r •r r �� w•r.I.+ IINy I . :I d'ir _ t a ri � i•Nwr / a C• /r� I 1 a r• �. /' � ••• i NNr r. Nr Norls- / ANt d Nltiy- IAAIM< /N•TH'NIgH/IdIPS ►;tii w- 20 "y.l7 /' /i •'��FN =. MIrM1'.r Nrd N( /(fONUN. /r i a a d 0 i a I W O i� a i 1� r• � � 'r II• I _ . r .....� w M Umocpl lD O vc C]wII. co ![wG i 7IldMF•9.OL rfJ1147R 1/ M SS L IR Il ICw K KCb / D a141a C C. Sn4 .* & PCA fp, W La z. dp x.a LSSOO r^ .c7 Y .ca w/D w / I " O 9JI LL MOMS O TC [Ow O 1v 2G*, .w0 SiR[ C/ rom [i011[USwG K .COpls[A o1i R! /J1It1 f D k= L ; + I � p � '•1 � a � 1 � � Z i f1 b Z t a i l S 1 V 11 I �) i '1 1 L • j L ; + F f1 t + 1 'jl L F s ii 1 I S lz s 1 '1 i �L• R1� � � + • j i• TRACT NO. 9370 N TIE ONOI COO ORLN KAIAROI.IO OF TNCCWNTI TRUST FUND L SOCIAIAN PEER YAUR RECOPCLO IN BOOR N PAGE TS, OF MAPS. RCOOROS OF TIC COORTT OF SAN OCONAROO10. STATE OF CALVORIOA ORRERS CERTVICATC 1 /( M Uf/ f ✓I /.'/YIf wiii /iI �• /iiI iINLF✓IO............ /J N/ /O YIa IIY �/[Y /Y /LI IN IIf(L III9. /fI (/MI_VYr l/ /Y( /W. YI( a•OY rfI /lIW /// I( ♦••un. n /un J JL /II�Y II; (I/(lM /YYII.OWIY.I•N✓IIY II � %i %% l• /Y I/We.lii/ II fn![V•T II/ /% YlI1 ii �w OT a.I.Y•./(f %II i /%Y/1�tai'I Ii I( / %iLII� /II •-j jrr /q• (lMY/I %'JiP'O• /Y( //•O //IO I OallsY b�LY aI /a'I YL••IZIry I(d! /J /lK( %YY. ntt! ?AO!• t!R A (/Y /!!O /AN1MlNJM//a. -IV or Fltt! FlPO! O!F(t //,uYlNt CAR . A !M offtr.1�RN NpiLN[ ACL.gRL[pGYCRT J•Ir/ Y f /YIYr•Y 1� . Trr�r rn•./ lldu. •�/ �iN il.(.Ifr/.i (r! lii ( :Y•/N•°1Jfl� ✓• " ./. pow •rY a.r/ % / /N /r.Ir/ ... aw/.. r U.. �. lI ua fvfY.rrr r iiY•v.`ii iN i::.N:Ja'i.:� � uiiii irY %da r.YWI W /MIa /a aV • YfI fIM'IIY• I / /ff //I +N {Y/ IL ILl• I�IIYI IV /•1 / /KYT/ /YILY {Y rlr /Y Lwr•Ae nro y r�••Ir FNOmFLP3 CCPTIF¢CTE / In I w MVInW. /r/.YIT/^= �IMI /^ / /I•w Ywh'r •i Ir` N-N .-(N.r w..fl Jw r•+.wi+A.•.. o. AI's W ay.n M1N N +M L••.ws. - %svu CO TT SYRVCTOR'S CV'TVICAT[ le =—YAll r 4 M1.K•..v :Y r• n r � aMw/N �r:M /ice ACCEPTANCE CERTVICATE •. L /JY• /u/ IMiR / +lW„YII /Y /af fN•n % N. •I•/ I «I % //O �•� /LML %n['I /IIl L% LL a/fI %P/ +W rr +/fr .,,. /.. {• +••IieawrLrc YU ror•rr m•1 f.rc�rf 01 —_ __R(/a++ AATOR S CERTIFICATE /N.I •Mf lyAtY -I.%'Y ".•vaw•f -n•.. \rw .F• /,..I.I......wr+ nr /N/nN•/ n /.•...Y .. v /Ni/i[L. /a.. _YIOISL. yY"•.E, -nsM (w�f ivi'+ w5 ' OWN, Y SOICRVIS01Y5 CCRTVICATC / lTi/i +w•M wM• ✓/l I4 Nrr /rv/� r wv A.F 4/Ya- r//w'w Y'may pJ /I•.• MwR /� nV• 4.n� Nr. /Y' v Y /Y.Y•Vr•'!N'/ O.+I JY w /+R.r/•"I J"G UY I.r/ M• .t+^ A Y a ✓.•.Y N I./-/ SW/ •/'lt'rr •I ✓f • 3I^. rn r J/6aM1Y lr Gw..nr ice.. '3J (A'z y :. /2 7�»�•v sc•u h.o' sl..Er i or � v[us TRACT NO. 9370 F THE UNINCORPORATED TCRIOTORT Of THE COUNTY Or S/N BERN•ROINO "0 R SJYDNISgN Of APOR1gN Of LOTS 2.3 AND A, PROIRBI}ION TRYST FUND ASSOCIATION PER MAP RECORDED N BOOR IB, PACE TS, Of MAPS, RECORDS Of THE COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDNO, • STATE Of CALMOPNIA "HEARD ..rCLJ.__ - -- I is wi:ii�, �iirw••��':,ii:'– _ -- — ' }!E"''ir.. 23 m NEMANCEH F.:.a-.[ � / ,N, yr.; .Iry � ^ ,' - M. ✓1/ 1 ✓f i /.tY r. . 9•n 1 .� N raly T wKRVE •• �I nY Jr is ti •I • zc .N �I 1� J Zi _- 1 N O .T tP rr in H II1I11 i, I 11 I 1 is I �"itA:rl iv FI F /ilu H•.r' 1 r:n 4'. II J • ` I • - T• � `I S • i• I� JI i I � El J Y 11 ; Y If 1 t Al e L • IP AV /f! !![ SRtlr HD. J t r..1 /•u.wr ra uN,r .r.•HnI NIr n.NawN .Y //� //Y II Iy /Na NII1iM HYtI.1IIYtIy MNI l I•VI.I. /.N wII r /•./• /n /r/ rY•u a•us n rrN P +rr lw rw /// Nrl/ I/I I/ III rI• (/Iy/I q/tl /.NIWI M /II ! I..I I.I 14 / /Il NIII /IMIM•MLIN•Nr•a Nh+:1 r• LM1 MI /NrrN %Yr /t • I P NY /Ilt arwl/I/ /I...y I ✓I /V INf I/ MI /I !O »wNfP /M NfII: HIIIIRrr 4RR a.I /Ib•rfal �•�' � - _ = . /.HN.UI IrNYr. - I�/•R /I•I /wYY /I/r /I.I/I•Y.. I. Ir / /MfN tYt. ;q��11� _.y' e7„ .+ MfFr M IaI MIN /wl N N/ (HVfI / -FINII Y //I r lY F1YMIl rhRSt l //N! /lal. � •• r% t. •Y.M•I _ v! K tM•I•� Ali i r•VM J I I Q Q I: JP Q Q I � i pN _ I a..• � �. ice_ _ _ p _ I �. 1 ` I I `S f I I p I 2A C I f CC I II• 2 Y 11 ; Y If 1 t Al e L • IP AV /f! !![ SRtlr HD. J t r..1 /•u.wr ra uN,r .r.•HnI NIr n.NawN .Y //� //Y II Iy /Na NII1iM HYtI.1IIYtIy MNI l I•VI.I. /.N wII r /•./• /n /r/ rY•u a•us n rrN P +rr lw rw /// Nrl/ I/I I/ III rI• (/Iy/I q/tl /.NIWI M /II ! I..I I.I 14 / /Il NIII /IMIM•MLIN•Nr•a Nh+:1 r• LM1 MI /NrrN %Yr /t • I P NY /Ilt arwl/I/ /I...y I ✓I /V INf I/ MI /I !O »wNfP /M NfII: HIIIIRrr 4RR a.I /Ib•rfal �•�' � - _ = . /.HN.UI IrNYr. - I�/•R /I•I /wYY /I/r /I.I/I•Y.. I. Ir / /MfN tYt. ;q��11� _.y' e7„ .+ MfFr M IaI MIN /wl N N/ (HVfI / -FINII Y //I r lY F1YMIl rhRSt l //N! /lal. � •• r% t. •Y.M•I _ v! K tM•I•� Ali i r•VM �o re 0 .b6 N O � iir�I rr .. %•rte u� h TRACT NO. 9370 N THE M,mo%pDRA,ED lVn,ORT Or TI[ COWITV OS SAN SSRNRRDIRO eEPM A SOeDMSION Or A PORIMN or LOTS E 3 ANO . P00we11NRY TMf fUNO ASSOCIATION PER MAP RECORDED IN 0009 IS. PACE 17. Cr MAPS. RECORDS Or TI! COIRITT Of SAN ECANARDINO. STATE 0. CALIFORNIA 1: IL 11 ` n i It 1 Vi —I fz V ct CL W 2 3 D.a L r till s leak kIl � Y a '2 -I N L w I *: U ;rl / 9. L r•4 J r; A rT• REAJaMEP PARCIM 01 I � .Y t • 1 � / . � �T.. I• J 4 .o rte.. �nr.....ow ' / —,I� - _�'�IET1— J,•✓�n �Ir�1 v -�IrCr i•N,�•`�h_n.� .r�,wJra. (STATE ,ervws JOJ ......5::'•::i"' •il��:)u ��i:iuin i ". 7 — --------- �I I I Sridi.w_ —T 1 I 1 I n I ry I .'r n• i .. _ is 1\ rI.A.7 T2 0 �� - , t �{%�'� �.�A6.t.�.. U.zz:L�1},[.....��0 C S�O �i 7�47•�cI - °� SE[ swer M0 L e f I LSi�51 -�en IL .REE. I= t[ I, rn�u T�aa� . I 6 6� JE 11 ` n i It 1 Vi —I fz V ct CL W 2 3 D.a L r till s leak kIl � Y a '2 -I N L w I *: U ;rl / 9. L r•4 J r; A rT• REAJaMEP PARCIM 01 I � .Y t • 1 � / . � �T.. I• J 4 .o rte.. �nr.....ow ' / —,I� - _�'�IET1— J,•✓�n �Ir�1 v -�IrCr i•N,�•`�h_n.� .r�,wJra. (STATE ,ervws JOJ ......5::'•::i"' •il��:)u ��i:iuin i ". 7 — --------- �I I I Sridi.w_ —T 1 I 1 I n I ry I .'r n• i .. _ is 1\ rI.A.7 T2 0 �� - , t �{%�'� �.�A6.t.�.. U.zz:L�1},[.....��0 C S�O �i 7�47•�cI - °� .REE. I= t[ I, 11 ` n i It 1 Vi —I fz V ct CL W 2 3 D.a L r till s leak kIl � Y a '2 -I N L w I *: U ;rl / 9. L r•4 J r; A rT• REAJaMEP PARCIM 01 I � .Y t • 1 � / . � �T.. I• J 4 .o rte.. �nr.....ow ' / —,I� - _�'�IET1— J,•✓�n �Ir�1 v -�IrCr i•N,�•`�h_n.� .r�,wJra. (STATE ,ervws JOJ ......5::'•::i"' •il��:)u ��i:iuin i ". 7 — --------- �I I I Sridi.w_ —T 1 I 1 I n I ry I .'r n• i .. _ is 1\ rI.A.7 T2 0 �� - , t �{%�'� �.�A6.t.�.. U.zz:L�1},[.....��0 C S�O �i 7�47•�cI - °� TR ACT NO. 9419 BI UYIACOf,aQATC0 7CRP 1TORY OF Tiff COUNTY Of- SAN BjRNARO/NO BEING A S✓,9&WS /M' Or 4073 / TNROMN S /A'CM/S/.'E Ir TRACT AO l773 45 PCP MAP RECOROCO /N BOOR 7T PAGE 75 or MAPS 70GC7w A O/7/. VIU7f0 RACCP SrRfET ER /ANT STRCCE AND PORTIONS Or RONO:71 S7RIEr AND OURa NDV I✓E WC wrom TRACT NO SBJO AS PER MAP RCCORCrO IN BOOR 71• PAGES M ANO L Of MAPS, OCCOP05 Or SAN BCRNAROINO COUNTY CAVrORNrA ANORCASCN CNG/NCCRING CO SCP7fM8CR /DEB • r � r. wi. r _ • r erw •r v a. JUt19 1977 ••.i ... ..•r ... «r �. Y.r r�.r- ROAD UVAR7NGAT ..n. -.�• ....r.r SMOnntrnrcnmr •i•�i =r .. ro .... u . r .r_.r. +w.r r•+ r • � 1M_, uv.n. .) 0 r • r � n .n •• /IJJ _ • JUt19 1977 ••.i ... ..•r ... «r �. Y.r r�.r- ROAD UVAR7NGAT ..n. -.�• ....r.r SMOnntrnrcnmr .) 0 r • r � I I TRACT NO. 9419 N WMCORIVRArED TERRIAORY Of THE MAY" Of SA.v BEPNARD /AO BC NO A SVBO'HSIOV OI' LOIS / INROIA'N S IV03IVE 01 IRnCI NO 6175 AS RJR MAP R(CORKD /N BOW' 11 4CC 1S W MAPS lq;[INLR nAN IACAIED RACER SIPEE! ERGNC SIRCP AND RWnOvS W RONCC7/ S7R((I AAO B✓PCVNDV AJENLE RECORDS OI SAN B�.VAPDINO COVN71 CCAL�YOANIA 11. PAGES Jt ANp JJ Pn MAPS, ANORCASCN CNOINCCRINO CO SCALC 1.60 S(PICMBCR 1976 !� •e tr ro.ew •s 'I m(�i /4frtM jl•� G11 (P(qY )IIf(I I ff1 •M 4 !lr /N:n 0 T.:J.T I n„ r n.'. .I.: V ( �I I I I 1 � I w w � I •• r �• •:•••.wv It �1 ..P /i r..I •i ..n •S� .P .l FWyJi.�• M. RMJRnMR r--% ,1 1.r • I 1 \HI,-I 1 1 Vv. — v\/ i 1- .t... N ^•I\Y 1. • N [ 1< O. hv.\ �,'' OW Ir, .•N.N fNr.YRn ir, l... ~. LocKw 11'}u. X-VJN6 ANe J VCV�.YING ohllc CLXI 11 IfJyf y ••^ � w w u M�ws.•wV •�.N rrw .•..•N F ••! O Yi-+ taN..6. u.<w W..T'�M�•.a ,cWw N•.Lw w ra ....a e..u.«u a.•...,u .aha e...nµt'� e s /`iiWi.t raf F.eR R J�y,f' • f�f�- •rY.MM.e .^n 4t e••!.t .r �. t.Y .wa• �1 w.✓ Y rN� aV .eN vant! .a) KlIc Mrs -- -- .• .. ✓.'•1 OM6�f! -/!(L_ FIAr•.ObbMl� <Y tr 4bw+..�M6YN w..4.O� n. nii Pv>' S• 1 L (j r '• Ccv.rn uv f INC. couC" uvW1 !pies CI_kllvlrA•>•L* w.40 i =nor/. = ..vY [. • ...... r.. n./..wr wY raw �... ..+. ..r.r +• ... . JA s }2 Ar�e•Jn,.vcr r1. levATW -•~ • •~ •.••_ �•N �'p•il >\C•'i x•,{111 IC 1.V V +e•I r�U +•- .� • .a ..0 ^1 W I...r .a. iM ufW.w nf•p .J.rY •M•.f •.�r� n. rYww.M r. n, .. z+ a...: ter•.. ��_.�_r�,r -'•a o • FF a to 191 � 1 >L O.Y b -t•MtV r,O ^..Y V,a • llM1+r u' y ,i W t_oeKrnxv Cutartcrxw. Nn 3xw -na Cn,vwfv,tuc. { 1 / a1� l , sr..I '1� , 1 1 i• I t:: ' \+I +;... - • .:.. - o 13 3 •••�;:._ . _..— -: =•� ne i ymr r�t ..1 it , :• �;:• .�', � �� +e1 I t 110 1:6 4,-. • ^y `�.s lry'r. , `rr m.c• rs'.n I -^ � ru � � S ` 1 ...l...= : JI 2. ..• r -- �--- Pt- L\CerZ— •, ..��'t' =_iai• :i 't,W � ..',s, • Qi s tot 7 brl i 1 J>1 v K•a 1i ?Vr tail >6 a, U >.� t0>Ot tAt l• l• i I• �. •• }, IIf - il- r i ti m' i i .» i ztu> i :or 2 t toG tos I. r t a' ~-ne vt ;y i4>n it i; �C: f Is I �— �•{'e.-- KONL•CTl'JJJ"��`-'__••— �;; �� -r t� -y�1:. �i .... ;, � {° ;9 I yL t ;p �:e=, C t• �' I r iV tie 2rr D 7 Gam' . �- "row•„s wt+a ,w .rin,.•+ if' U� Y�.3" +tl rt' ,�1 � •` •• •. "JAR 1 . tI 1�', Ito ".tad I df" A- JZC,4, 19 0S /h" 6ezn -ems P, 0 0 July 17, .979 City of Rancho Cuaamonga OP.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Co. 91730 n u Attar City Clark Door Sire Attached you Will find copies of two bills that we have paid due to a savor problem that ue caused fro the floods during 1978 and 1979. the road Ln front of our home aoiaopsed due to the Water and many trucks an! cars passing ovor the weakened area. I called the cit/ party tiaos to have this problm fixed but it was not takon care of for months after. The sewor lino broke and due to the breakage m.,,. roots got in the line and wxdo it worst. We "ad up With aerious backing up :r saver in a= house and had to employ Roseuo- Rootor twine to sow if they cou:l +Lan out the lino. Finally the Cucamonga dater District came out on Ju17 1979 and dam the area up and found that the LLn was broken. I called Coh. City Planning Commiasaonr and talked to Yr. Paul Roagau and realir.Lla that the city owns 33' fro: the center of the road I now fool that we shhuld be roinlwod for the $155.00 tbat we had to pay the Rescue - aooto.• Co. sehon it turned o:t to be a city problem. Thank yva for 7oa consideration in this problem and �ex- pocng to hoar '.'ran ;.tier office on this olio Hh- Richard Pow 6790 Hell:-An Avo. Alta Lora, Ca. 91701 (714) 997-3359 A- - - -_ /-/?, CITY OF �; FC CUCP!„LNQq TRnT1011 AN JUL 20 1979 718191d11111711121014/S g s Y' cl t' III cl g I �C X' hill ?CF 0c' gg / R T V ►; _ �•, 0. `i J i i u •3a� � g ' " o s � e 8 -;. O s Y' cl t' III cl g I �C X' hill ?CF 0c' gg / R T V ►; _ �•, 0. `i J i •3a� � g ' " o s � e 8 -;. O IPA Q s Y' cl t' III cl g I �C X' hill ?CF 0c' gg / R T • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Data: ,ktguat 15, 1979 Tot t:ity Council and City Manager From: lack Lm, Director of Cmmunity Development Subl ect: APPFAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SITE APPROVAL N0. 79-12= FOHP. AM 8` Raqueat for the development of a pro- 1 essional office building and service star ion to be located cn the southeast moor of Hallman Avenue and Bsaellna Avenue within the A -P (Administrative Professional) tone know as Parcel NAP Ro• 208 - 431 -14 Related Itm: Minor Deviation No 79 -11 - None Associates ABSTRACT: On July 11, 1979, the Planning C ®issioa approved Negative Declaration and Site Approval No. 79 -12 and Minor Deviation No. 79 -11 for • Hone and Associates to develop the southeast comer of Hellman Avenue and Bseeline as an administrative office caplex with a service statoa. this was the first application that came before the Planning Commission that had a service station usw in the A -P Administrative Pmfessonal Zone. This service station has been designed to be an it%ral part of a proposed office couples On July 24, 1979, Beloud and Hannerioo filed a letter of Appeal the subject application. Pour specific points were mentioned as the heals for the appear : 1 report hh because wi station is not compatibleth he other mentsInthe surrounding tea. 2 are service idi tance of the propoeda within a short service station - 3 Hello= Avmue is not likely to became a major earth vest thoroughfare in the near future 4 Service station at the proposed location will not be succeastul businesswise The letter of appeal is attached for the Councils' review. This report will reeomend that the Council dmy the appeal, thus approving the Negative Declaration and site Approval No 79-12 IN t DISCUSSION: A 16,150 square toot two story office building and a 1,515 . square foot service station are proposed for the site In &"let= to mu- version of the existing single family Mme to as office. There Is also an additional 2,600 square foot future office sits proposed for construction at a later date. The location of the service station at the corner of Helicaa and Baseline to Its present siting alloys for a unique approach to service station design. The building will rear onto the corner of Hellman and Baseline Avamm" thus using the structure as a screen obscuring the view of the gasoline pumps and ear bays. It will also allow the applir_mt to provide sore than the required landscaping on the corner pcovlditg additional screening. The two story office building has base located on the site to provide m effective scram of the esIntfog railroad tracks from travelers on Saseline Avenue. We would like to note that the Planning commission ws concerned with the design of the service staticn and its compatibility with the proposed office building A condition of approval was added to the Resolution which womId require the applicant to resubmit the service station elevations with addi- tional embellishments and armltectural features to make It mare compatible with the proposed office. pit have attached the Planning C ®Lsfoa Staff Report and meting minutes for the Council's review. In review of the applicants letter, w find that the request for m ewicou- . mental Impact report is not Justifiable became service statfou development is allowable in the A -P zone with the approval of a I— Los and davelolsmt plan (Site Approval). The primary purpose of Site Approval Is to determine vhether or not ens service station use is compatible with the area, and Improvements et.etlog or contemplated. The applicance second, third and faith points stated in the Iacter of appeal are more Judgemental on the appellant'[ part rather than Justifiable in fact. There is only one other service station is close prazlmity to the prcpased station; that is the Standard Station located at the southwet career cf Carnelian Avenue and Baseline Avenue. The appellant's c ®-.°' Im relation tt the statue of Hellman Avenue is also locarrect. Hellman Avenue is designated on the Hester Plan of Straits and Highways for the City of Rancho Qucmmonga, as a residential collector street, which by its design collects residential traffic from adjacent tracts and funnels this traffic to Foothill I1vd. or Baseline Avenue. The appellant's point about service stations at the proposed location, meeting with success or failure, is again a judgmental decision m the part of the appellant, unless supported by ecomomic studies and market analysis Additionally, the appellant has concluded that the sppileactm did not contemplate that type of development, a concluston that In regard to the appellants comments regarding failure of service station buslarmcp conditions of approval have been added to the Resolution to require the removal of the service station should it become abandoned within 90 days. • FAIM • It is our opinion after review of the appellants renan" for the appeal at we do not for th spwm&l fariJkSative Declaration uor Site Approvaltrw •79-12. request mm- OMMATIOS: It is recoasended that the City Council deny the appeal approving Segative Declaraticu and Site Approval Ito. 79 -12 as approved by the planing C000iOfoa with the eonditlom included in the &--solution attached. Respectfully aybmitted, ]AM LAN. Director of C°mnity Develnpeeat JL:IM* m Attachments 0 11 4 BELOUD. AND MANNERINO e o row r »t orncu „ nowQ. a •bevD� MawM0. l:wW OeMe rltti ql rOel Mil elvp ., >.+ p nwnn4uno Ir Pr onm trranno, cw n-, ew[[u,r[ eurc�ro c„cew+a., u To the Honorable Mayor and City Council, July 24, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga P U. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Re: Serv_ce Station Located Southeast Corner Baseline and Hellman -- Set -back Oeviaticn Gentlemen: We are in the process of completing improvements for the opening of an office on elan I lman, and, hence, we are very interested in the proper development an tilizat.an of land in the vicinity. At its meeting of July 11, 1979, the Planning Commission approved a variance to permit service station Improvement at the above captioneSL location and a variance from the act -back required from 25' to 15' We feel that your Honorable Body should consider the entire project on the basis that% 1) There is a definite wed at this location for an Environ- mental Impact Report because a service station is not compatible with the other improvements in the surrounding area, whether completed, in progress, or contemplated; 2) The widening of Baseline will undoubtedly make it the major east /west street in Rancho Cucamonga There arc service stations in other locations on Baseline within short distance of tho proposed service station; 3) Hallman Avenue was originally con3tructed to serve two purposes: a) as a roadway, and b) as a water run -off or drainage ditch It is not, in view of the development of Carnelian and Archibald, likely to become a major northwest thoroughfaru in the near future; and 4) A service station at the proposed location is quite unlikely to meet with success buslnesswise, and more important, is not the type of improvement that was contemplated by the owners of that property mn+ch had advertised the development of a professional • li 7 City of Rancho C, -amonga July 24, 1979 Page Two center with no m:ntion of a service station. Service stations, unless they are instant business successes, soon lapse into untidy eyesores. Examples of this can be easily found along Central Avenue in the City of Montclair. We are told that a proposed service station on the southwest corner of Baseline and Archibald (which is a more likely location, in view of the present signs of development) was denied because of incompatibility of surrounding development In the instant case, a service station would certainly be incompatible with the development of business and professional oriented businesses on the north side of Baseline between Bellman and Archibald. Certainly in th, discharge of your responsibilities referenced to the orderly development and the best use of the land in Rancho Cucamonga, you should have the advantage of an Environmental Impact Report. • Accordingly, we request that the whole project be re- reforred to the Planning Commission for further study and the development of such an EIR. • Very truly yours, IBE;VM BEELLOU AND MANNERINO E RGB /gjw Encl: Fee for appeal, $100.00 RM WMAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 9 DATE: July U. 1979 TO: Planning Commission FROH: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECI: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 79 -12 - None - Request for the development of a professional office building and aarvice station to be located on the southeast corner of Hcl'man and Baseline within the AP administrative professional zone known as parcel number 208 - 431 -14. RELATED IMi5t Minor Deviation No 79 -11 - None /Barmaktan ABSTRACT: .his is the first application coming before the Planning Crwission for a service station with the AP (administrative professional) zone Additionally, th.s service station has been designed to be an integral part of the proposed office complex The constraints of this particular site should a,, kept in mind in reviewing this application They are as follows: 1 Thn shape of the property is trim2ular; 2 The property is adjacent to the railroad right of Way; 1. There is an existing house which has been converted to an office and proposed to be retained on the site; 4 A minor deviation in also being proposed in onjunctiun with this application and chould be heard concurrently Approval of Site Approval No. 79 -12 is recomxanded DISCUSSION: Existing on site is an 1800+• square foot office which is a conversion of an existing single family home. 16,150 square feet of two -story office building and 1,575 square feet of service station are proposed to be added to the site There also is an additional 2,400 square Coot of future office site proposed for construction at a later date Three means of access are proposed to the site One 4certs along Baseline at an approximate width of 45 feet and two accesses on ileum. +a Avenue with widths of approximately 35 feet each The accesses proposed more the adopted Access Policy of the Planning Commission. The proposed office building will be a wood fr•me structure The s rvice station will be steel frame with plastered valis The exis,'ng converted office :a a wood frame structure with plastered walla Total building sgurre footage provloed on site is 21,925 square feet (including 2400 square feet future office area) requiring the provision of 98 parkin3 spaces at present An idd :tonal 12 parking spaces are required for the future office iron of 2400 square test. You will note on the plan the applicant has provided the addltfonpl/1Ni�pto parsing spaces at the southwesterly :g1%JI r,.,,, n,.,, end of the property which Would meet the City's requirements for parking at one • spate per 200 square feet of gross floor area TWO monument signs are proposed for the site; both are to be used for the Mobil station No monument signs are Ir,posed for the office complex The proposed landscaped conceptuc -Ian Indicates a good use of harming, trots and shrubbery to ltnd to the site a garden office atmosphere ANALYSIS: We have reviewed the plans and have the following areas of concern 1 Compatibility of architecture; 2 Landscaping around the existing office; I Signs for service station lac at1b111t of Architecture - Three buildings are proposed for this site The main structure on t e site will be the garden office center, a two -atory wood frame structure with a tile cap and diagonal wood siding accentuated by white pilasters Tbere will be a Mobil service station, a metal frame structure, with wood siding soma tilt cap Work; and the existing office structure a spanivh style converted single family residence We feel that thb garden office center has brought out the basic elements of t..e existing converted office, such as the use of the tile c'P. white stucco, wood siding and wood railings However, the Mobil service station needs additional delineation to blend • It Is our opinion that the free standing canopy of the service station should be modified A tile cap should be added and the supports widened The corner ele- vnelou that displays weed siding should display the same detail wood siding 1 a diagonal as does the garden office center and additional white vertical pilasters a,vuld be added on the corner elevation. also a red the cap should be echoed on the sarvica atatlon j :ndsc.rpina around the existing office - It 1e the intent of the applicant to charge the front entrance of the converted office to take access frcnt the center. While staff has no problems with this proposal We do, however, feet that ndditional landscaping should be olded around the office to soften the lines of the office As the plan currently Indicates, there is not enough landscaping proposed aronni the existing office 21on for service stativa - The applicant proposes to locate two monument signs for the sole use oy the service station The Sign Ordinance sets forth standards for service station signing and standards for signing of renters There t. a basic questicn that is raised oy this proposal Was It he intent of the Planning Commission to allow a jer.ice station Icsigned In contunctton With a canter two free standing monument signs it addltbm to the free standing signs allowed for a center for a maximum total of G signs' Or Waq it Ills Intent of the Commission that the standards for service station signing were for Individual parcels not •leatgned Within a center such as the service stations that the City has on Fuotblllt These queatlons must be answered by the Planning Commission Perhaps ® a compromine of one free standing sign for service stations designed In conjunction with a center could be allowed 50 T.NVIR04NENTAL ASSESSMENT - Staff has fieli checked the site to , Ify the Initial Study. There will not be a significant onviromenral iaparr as a result of the • project Ne recommend the Issuance of a Negative Declaration REC0:01ENDATI04: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No 79 -51 approving Site Approval No 79 -12. Reap pctfull s bmitted, . Jack 0M. Director of Community Development JL:ER4:cc Attachments: Initial Study Resolution N^ 79 -51 40 I-1 I� J 6/ • I �� `� C' ' 4 I Ll d' • • A A�e .31W /Aff�RoYA. NO. 79 -& AhO MI?!": GeViATIOIJ NO 19-11 7 r" I• - _ I Now i A .�I RANCHO PROFESSIONAL CENTER j x art L SIGN 0 I L .1 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCANCYGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION S:IEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the DevelOPmont Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Developm4nt Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an en- ironmental inpact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information ropott should be supplied • by the applicant givirg further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Rancno Professional Center APPLICAI.T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Attn Gaylaird ChriStopher Barmakian -Wolff S Asst fates 93'C" Street, Suite 201. Uoland. CA 917.M ClEyy— -Mt NAKE. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE COATACTCD CONZ:cRNING THIS PROJECT: Hr C•ug Ilene. 7333 Iletiman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 •I LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 1:0.) 7333 - -llman Avenue Parcel He 208 - 431 -14 LIST OTHER PERMITS rrE.cr -SAR•i FROti IAICAY, RLGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND 'lilt AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Pemft. ® -- -- 1 -( ✓11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION? DFSC ,pIPTION OF PRUJEC 1 1. Two story office buildi construction, stucco walls. 2 Service station. S[ee r ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE' OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Land - 2 01 Ac�os Existlna Buildinas • 1800 so. ft Prnnn%Pd nuildinas • Office 18_i5n DESCRIBE THC ENVIRONMENTAL SCTTTNG OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORb1ATION ON TOROGF4APHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND Till; DESCRIPTION OF Ally EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USL: U\TTACH 14ECESSARY SHEETS) rodent Eli t n2 wood frame, stucco huildinn will remain with r, m nor alterations a Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a serieu of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Ilo z -2� WILL TIIIS PROJECT: • YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? I 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? % 3. create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, firo, water, sewage, otc.)? 4. ,:reate changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 1 __ S: Remove any existing trees? Now many? 2 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamnablos or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above. • t ual ^._- 1 nran^e iml ,f rant tr s ya rious other nail fndit —t'^e. will have to he rnmoerd INP9RTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CCRTIFICATION: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluntion to trio best of my ability, and that t1Lo facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the bast of my knowledge and belief. I further understand tln t additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by th m, to,. ant Ravirw Com. it ec. ; ® 0.ite Signature Title ig RESIDENTIAL CONSTRNCPIWI Thn following infomation should be provided to the city of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential devalcp-.ent_ Nave o•_ Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specitie Location of Project: PRASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PIIASP. 4 TO—AL. 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin. construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 7fodel 8 and ? of Tentative S. Dedronrs Price Rance T -� Sr7 • BEST .109 w0 79 -31 A BCSOLMON OF THE RANCHO CUI:AYUNI:A PLANNl RG CMMSSION APMUVLHG SITE APPROVAL rn 79 -12 IACLTr..,R AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HELL`U9 AVENUE A= AASELM AVENGE IN THE A -P ZONE. :RtECEAS. ma Ilay 18. 1979. a forest application was submitted requesting rer:.em of the shoes described project: and L'REM". oa 7ume 27. 1979. the Planning Cmolasloo held a duly adven lsed Jwblic hearing for the above deacribed project. Nom. MMREpna°.'1:E UNC110 CUCMM -A PL- tMl'1G CMI1SCICN RESOLVED AS AYR Q 6: CCCTI(N That the following findings have been made: L 'hat the site is adequate in size and shape L That the site has adequate access. 3. Th= the proposed use will have no adverse effect on abutting property A. That the proposed use is con.astent with the General Plan. 5. That the conditions listed In this report are necessary to protect the public healtlq safety. CnmloTt. convenience. and general welfare S1,010N 2i That this lro)ect will not Create %itnlfirtnt advcrme xmaaGs nn the eavlromnnt and a Negative Declaration lq Issued on July 11. 1979. SE:TICV 3: That Site Approval Do. 79 -12 is approved subject to the i..Aloving conditions: Applies= &hall contact the Bullding Dlvinion for compliance with the foll"Ing conditions: 2- Existing buildings shall be -.:r t• - rl with the current building and zonh.r r,olati,in for the intended use or the building shill be demolished Applicant sha11 cnntoct the rlanning Division for compliance with the following wndltions: L :its servlce station elevallunq 91,311 he red atitnd to Incorporate the use of rile tile• cap .•o rlx raewpy. more substantial supports. tile car on the building. the same idirection of wood siding and additional white plastered .00 Pilasters- Rodents- shalt be submitted and approved by the Planning Division prior to boildinq pernits Such redesign shall be consistent with the main struetnre 1. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' • and directed away from all property lines, jjacent streets and residences. 6. Parking spaces shall be double striped. 5. Parking .•t trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size 6. Any signs proposed for this development shall he designed In conformance with Comprehensive Sign ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to Installation of such signs 7. A detailed landscape and irrigation elan shall he submitted to and approved by the Planning DivlHon prior to the issuance of building permits 8. All landscaped areas shall be maintained In .. healthy and thriving condition, free from words, trash, and debris 9. A Master Plan of the existing on site trees shall be provided to the Planning Division as part of the final grading plan to determine which trees shall be retained 30 Street trees, a min'anaa of IS Ration slxe or latgcr, shall • be installed in accordanco with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucnmwnga 11. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plan on file In the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein 12. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclo <cd by a 6 foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to city standards. Location to the satisfaction of the Planning Division 17. All roof appurtenances, tnclodiag air c.mditioners, skill be architecturally Integrated and shlotded fr••m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets to the satisfaction of the planning, Division and Building Official. 16 Approval of Site Approval 79 -1' is granted subject to the approval of Minor Deviation 79 -11 Applicant shall contact the fnginerring Division for complaince with the following conditions: 15 Dedication of the follew•nc migatnc rlrhta�.f -way on the following streets: i additional feet on Mellow. • 16 Corner PIL radius will ue required per City standards. 59 17. Prior to any muck b, Ing Performed In tloe pehlia right - of -way, an encroachment retail shall lie obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other Politics required 18. Approved street let rovement plans preparei by a Registered Civil E- gincer shall be required, for all attest improvements, prior to lsssan,e or encroachment Permit 19. All street improvements shall 11e inst,itcd to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy 20. Surety shall be posted and an tgrstment executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and tile City Attornev. _ ' guaranteeing coo„letlon of the public improvements prior issuance of building permits 21. Ct•nstruct the following missing tmplevement+ on the fo.lowing streets: llellmau: curb and Rutter, A C pavement sldevilk• drive approach, street trees, street lights, A.0 overlay Base Line: curb and gutter. A.0 pavement, sidewalk, drive approach, street trios. Street Itgbts, A C overlay. 22. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and strect nave signing plan shall be required 23. An approved grading plan and soils cellst In accordance with the City grading standards will he required 24, The appllcavt will be responsible for cuns.ructirn of all on site drainage facilities required I,y the City Engines, 25 The proposed project (,ills within areis Indicated ns subject to flooding under the Nationil Flood lnquranre Program and is subject tr the prot(st.,nq of that program and City Ordinance No 24 26, The following north -sou Ht stroots shill be d•si.ocd -is major water carrying slrcctq regntrille I n.mb in.n loo „ specirl curb hetghtq, camacrelrl tvp•• drive apnnauhoq• rolled street connections, fit •••d protection rills, nd /or landscaped earth berms and rolled drivew.leq at property line: llellman Avenec 27 All proposed utilities within tie protect shalt be installed underground 28. Utility easements shall be pr,.vidcd t•, the gperlfiration of the appropriate utility comp.tnies and the City Engtnecr. Yr. 29 Developer shall be resronntble fur the rel-•eatdun of emistfng public utilities. as required • 30. Developer shall be responsible for the Installation of street lighting in accordan.e with Southern California Edison Company .nd Citv standards 31. Water and sever system plans shall he designed ind constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga county Water Dietriet (CCWD). Foothill Fire District and the Envirormel.tal Health Departmcnt of tl:e County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from CCWD will be required prior .: r.cnrdation 32. Permits from ocher agencies Will be rvgntred as follows: From the San Bernardino County Flood Control Applicant shall contact the Planning Div Lsinn for compliance with the following conditions: 33 There shall he no outdoor displiv or %torage of tires, vending machines, batteries, food items. Inoperable autos or other similar items e<rort for the nnmil display oil and petroleum produ:ts at the pump Islands 34. Should this station be abandoned (out ,.f buniness) for more than 90 days, the strictures sh.11 be rmcvcd from the site and the tanks flllLd er removed to the sntts- fartion of the Planning Division and Eire Department 35. There shall be no washing of automobiles 36. Any repair of auto stall occur totally wlthln a building and shall consist of oil ch -:nren auto tune up, tire repair and replacement, hose changes and the like No auto body work or painting In allowed 37 Any use of the site for towing gervlre will regaire that the tow, truck be stored to a butlJiug When net in operation 38. left turn access from Bcuelln Avenue may be denied in the future should severe traffic prellem% result from the location of the Baseline driveway APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Ills DA1 OE IU0 , 1979 PLANNING MMISSI04 OF THE CITY OF RMCHO CUCAMNGA BY: HERMAN RMREL I Herman Rem at, C imam • ATTEST; Sccrotsr7 of the Planning Commieston 6/ 1n review of this matter, will be recooAendi ocn sec m it is felt this type of use should be located de Hogan eta -ed the staf[, rather then on the fringe which could dental of ctto redo pity central co cam industrial adjoining Use" conflict with adj avilrman Itmpnl opened the public hearing. Nr Mario Maury. president of Houry Microwave, atat feel their heliport Sa slightly math of this proposed site Ile does not foal a heliport would be slightly with the zoning for the area ito fc ola it would de ialOff this to their ope ration. lie asked that the S.xoission retina forda decision. request and that it not be contimud to the nest meet itrdated this site is mr Hark H°arY, also associated with Maury a Microwave with field for the helicopters 1,200 feet tram the prepoaed Chaffey Skills Center. landlocked on throe sides by will be approximately Thole are also power 11°ee in the arse which he would assume to be in the this type of dSever paint It is their opinion neighborhood of 60 feet He has letters from evelO leSeQ s Safety is the at in the area have she. concern about ba" . an area for a landing this is too =all and patnacy issue. 75 to 80 yards from this Hr Starling Hincaid, stated he resides approximate u to proposal He to in opTo sit ton to this request due [o the ae the bean lends will create in he this sit" from is t concerned about he noise and ethe danger and taking from this project Chairman RmPcI C-1 used the • '[here being no further comments from the audience, Public clearing licant. he should be given a on behalf of s he has requested a continuation. Also It Commissione Garcia tstated, s r *P' ,td to a site prior to local to is his opinion no approval from the FM should fthis apPr°°al• approval He would like to he••e a coPY isatoner Dahl co we1�11o1a79 ner tGarcianand seculardmoctlog of July 25, 1979 A Motion was made by continue Site at the applicants request. AYES: GARCIA. DAID.. ]ONES, RE1PEL NOES: 1104E ABSENT: TOLSTOY s a a s It _ ent of t1iT:ATI'1E DELI,ARATSON AhD SITE AL NOAL 7� The don rhea professional office bull, ing and 9ervlc! scat con to be toe Ann ssortlaeParcel eiat corner of 11011man ,ud Baseline within the A -P zone NO 208- 431 -14 vtattcn for service I NI`CR DE9IAt I04 NO. 79 -LI - loud BAILMUTAN - A Hlnor On station Vet -backs for pr °per [Y beat ed °° the southeast corner o[ Baseline ® Ln Hellman l!L L July 11, 1979 _3- Plaming Coamiswion Him Itea - -- Barr? Hogan, b at Planners reviewed the staff reports Staff recommends that an additional condition be added to Resolution NO 79 -51 as follows: Left turn access tram Baseline Avenue may be denied in tl•o future ehau14 severe traffic problems result from the location of the Baselina 'riveway Scat! has three areas of concern which the Comiision should revtav as follows: 1) compatibility of architecture; 2) landscaping around the exasting offic -• 1) sigh for service station Staff recommands approval of Resolution No 79 -51 approving Site Approval No 79 -12 and Minor Deviation to 79 -11. Chairman Rmpel asked for comments from the applicant. Me Doug futon, applicants stated he has with him tnrtght several specLelists that are involved with this project if the Commission should hwe any questions. He introduced Mr. Gaylord Christopher to review the architecture of t,ma ire. ib =tssioner Garcia asked Mr. He= if he understands and is in agreement with the added :oadition requested by Staff. Mr Hone stated he is in agreement with the indition If there are an) safety problems created by this driveway they would want to see that miti- gated in the future In talking to his er3ineers regarding th L- driveway, they have indicated they do not sea any problems with 'he driveway ae stated by staff Gaylord Christopher, Architect, presented a aide presentation to the Cmmis- .ion for review of the proposm site. C==1ssioner Garcia asked Mr Hone his opinion regarding the sign issue Hr Hung stated the sign structure for the Rancho Professional Center ir• act t ck from the H.isellne /Hellman Intersection It is his opinion the sign pro - poaed for the service station -seta vzh the criteria which the sign committee and City agreed upon. They at requesting onproval of ten signs for the ser- vice station to identify Mobil and to list the qns prices State law requires that Mobil 011 Company post the prices and type of fuels they offer for sale It is his opinion the elgnage has been exceptionally w.11 done They do not wish to put any signs cn the Hallman /Baseline corner as they feel this will be a focal point for the center and they would like to have mourdirZ and landscaping in this area Chairman Hempel opened the public hearing fir henry Reiter. adjacent property owner, stated he ouna property north of this project Pe indicated he has known about this project for only two days There was acme r wurderstaading with the Planning Department and he was nor notified un -ii we days ago that this project was underway He did see a sign on the property indicating that Me Hone is leasing a profesalanal center His tenants have a right to know what is being proposed across the street. He is very concerned about the location of the driveway as proposed No one will be able to make left turns into either project Ile asked that the Convalssion post- pone a decislor on this project until after he is given an opportunity, to meet with his tenants to make them aware of this project This is an A -P zone and is Planning Commission Minutes -4- J•dy 11, 1979 1 63 by approvpryl a service station on this site it is setting a precident for the f,., b to allow other uses such as car washes, etc within that zone tic Jeff Sceranka, stated he was asked by the Chamber of Commerce to speak concerning this project The Chamber wants to express its concern over projects being dismissed and deliberated over long periods of time with staff at = extremely high cost to developers A mistake was made regarding the accost. driveway; hoKver, en amicable solution has been reached between the City ani the developer The scope of the Commission is to respect and preserve the architectural design of the city In this particular case, when staff and members of the Conaaisslon discuss architectural style and whether or not the development is ca.patlble this then becomes debatable between the architect and the city It is felt bi the Chamber that it is not the role of the staff or the Commission to debate this with the architect as the architect was hired by :he ocveloper to come up with a proposal and these people are professionals which have put a lot of work in the proposal In regard to the sign ordinance, as tic understood, two signs fronting on two separate streets would be allowed for tenant and /or center identification. Their understano ing was that signage tar the service station was to be independent of the center Signs for service stations hardly relate to tenants within the center and they feel by allowing aigna for the station on the corner has nothing to do with the signs nn the center itself. A ember of the audience asked what size trees will be installed within the development Chairman Rmpel stated this will be discussed further with staff and the owner to make are they are the correct size for the development There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman RCOPeI closed the public hearing. Mr Ilogan statee he would like to clarify the uses allov_d within thz A -P zone The Commission considered and recommended approval of a change to the A -P District to allow for automobile sarvice rtations Car washes would not be allowable within the A -P zone. Also in regard to public hearing notice$ for this project, a notice was published in the local newspaper In regard to Mr Reiter's project, he notified t e City he had not received a notim of the public hearing which tells us he did iinov about the project We did as a matter of policy send out another notice to him He has unof`Sc'al y known about the project for approxi- mately one weak. The Commission needs to determine the intent of the ordinance. Is it :o allow a service station designed in conjunction with a center two free standing monument signs in addition to the free standing signs allowed for n center for a maximum total of four signs? Or Is it the Intent of the Commie - slon that the standards for service station signing were for individual parcels not designed within a center such as the service station that the City had on Foothill? Comaissloner Dahl stated when talking about signige for service stations tied into a shopping center, first of all service stations as pointed mt, by law must post their orlces In a conspicuous place and moat be seen from the highway. That in itself indicated a neat to be able to allow additional stgnaga. It is ® his opinion up to two signs maximum should be allowed This should be considered separate from the r ter Plann. % Commission Minutes -S- July 11, 1919 °G / Chairman gospel stateed in trying to evaluate aesthetic value he would net like to see a big wall sign on a building indicating the price of the fuels . Be are trying to get buildings as much as possible to be compatible with the architecture around the site or the neighborhood dependirpl on what the total design of the aten 1s He does not have any problem with the monument sign for the service station. He does like to know before he drives Into a service station what kind of stab Ion it 1s and the pt ice he will have to pay for gas It is his opinion the monument sign should be allowed for the station with the design to be worked out with the developer Commis.ioner :ones stated It is her opinloL when a service station is dw.cloped on a worner lot whither in a center or whether it stands along a monument slgn should be located on each street for reasons of visibility. Commissioner Garcia stated in regard to the otgnage for this service station he does not feel this 1s a major problem. If a service station is allowed within a prof eseional complex, than it to part of a complex, otherwise it will be dealt with on a one to one basis In this case, the service station should be treated as part of the proposed center ChaLr.an Rmpel stated a clarification of the sign ordinance Is necessary in regard to service stations within a center and should be discussed at a later datn separate from this application. lit Hogan suggested that the Commission be poled to see whether or not they are in favor c: the two monument signs for the service station It was the consensus oe the Coolsslorn, by a 3 -1 vote (Commissioner Garcia voted a that the developer be allowed to have two monument signs for the Mobil S.rvlce Station Chairman Rmpel stated with regard to the service etutlon Itself, it is his opinion the station s'- uld either be made more compa.ible with the garden office building or should be made more compatible with the house as the way It is shown now It is not cmpat able with either Commissloner Garcia stated he would tend to disagree with Chairman Rmpel lie stated there is a question of whether the Commission is to be designers or planners. Sometimes continuity in not the beat solur n If done well this could be acceptable to the community and to the pu .c It is his opinion the site has been treated well Comaisslaner Dahl Indicated It is also his opinion the station design is very attractive On the other hand there is a few things he would like to see to make it conform more with the other two buildings This would be a very simple thing and nit entail tracmdous changes to the structure itself to bring In total conformance with the other structures If the Lbnmisston is In agreement perhaps a sub- a ®itteo of the Cox:=lasion could meet with the developer to make suggestions. Planning Conamlssioa Minutes -6- duly 11, 1979 0 6-1!� Chaiman RWPcl stated he does not have any rror.lm with the Pta Pawl as ' submitted with the condition as listed in the itesolutlon stating the service sWion elevotions sha�its. the does • not feelpAO sub cammitte'l needs Divisian prior to building p to be appointed as long as this condition remains in the Raaolut on. A Ebtion was stadia by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commissioner listed Dahl tc l ludingeadd Resolution t [urnl from Baseline BaselicneeiA anus may be denied In the future should severe [ruffle probl... result f -om rho location of the Baseline driveway. AYCS: GARCIA. CAW-. JONES, 1E1WEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: TOLSTOY Hr HogJA stated in regard to the added condition ir. Resolution No if the access driveway needs to be changed in the tutu[,, it will be the a City's reason chisitondit iwn hsadbeenuadded todthe R^solu.i nose to make the ownerhO ty it andhisInto the awarecthat I! there resirlct od blm In the futures ]art turn to at access A Motion was made by Comtissioner wehl and seconded by Cacumissioner Garcia to apprwa Minor Dev lotion No. 79 -1. au presented • AYES: DARL, GARCIA. JONES, REIPEL NOES: NONE ,SBSENt: TOLSTOY a • • a . BARKARIAH /k'OLFF - A zone nmttRATION AND 208E CHANOF. N0. 79 -07 [.....ore ial) for property thank; from R -� /Multiple FeaiAY, — - - locnk; on the notch aide of Baseline, west of Etiwanda. , r, stated staff is re Barry Hogan Senior Planners .,,,sending a nix mantle eon[lnua- go1.J °1zone ho alterwtivi, area 1a The 11illiav Lyon l Company °isn working u rn a re willtbe, selected thatchoenre within apDlieantthasiagreed to the 9L�emonth ° is cant im.,t ion C1,,iman Rmpal asked if anyone in the audience mould like to speak to this Lim at this time A cumber of the audience indicated thev own Property -2 adjacent to the zone chans;e request and asked if their property is ztite ry at this thou it, vbgan stated the zoning on the Property at`un[ ewith�ti•elrsgeneral by the County of San Parcity twee adod tel our own Cener. t Clan The Wv plod [Tien we became a back D states that we must go back dotted a reasonable tine to possiblehthat z0a1aR to Make it conform to chat adopted General Plan It to tx+ on that property as it now stands may not cored a to the Cdirec °dotted General Plan. Property owners will be mile oecuTtine[hayfuture� state or adver- tisment in the newspaper if changes hould6t Io.. 11 1010 Planntm com,"ton "Ina ra — ry C 1. INC. August 9, 1979 Mayor Jim Frost City Council City of Rancho Cut amonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 701 Dear Mayor Frost and City Counci, Members: I wish to commend the Planning oomission for its vote and approval of the commercial /professional tenter on the southeast corner of Base Line and Hellman. The plane were prepared by Barrakian Wolff and Associated for Mr. and Mrs. Doug Hone. I have seen the plane and feel this is a dofinite breakthrough in better quality )winaas property for Alta Loma- Rancho Cucamonga. The unique siting or a full service gas station within a professional complex, with the obvious quality designed in, should g1+e those tenants a special business advantage. I would like to encourage your vote to approve this pro,Ject W a good, positive influence on the future of this area. Very truly yours, CA. INC. , / Z`u. / I-Vint 1 Harry C.CCrwell HCC /mlb BUILDERS• DEVELOPERS ((//pp 521 No. Mountain A"., Suits *A 0 Upland, Ca If. 11786 a Telephone (7 161 981 -0041 �1 i ,71 AO -,-t- 6) 1""- c;17 PIAFN \nq L;u;fia�n ARC veR) u"t6 ►..G� o..F2 tLE pCeP.LE.I (oet 6\c or ki:IIMA» wn.4 C3 A3 E •ti-t,} ,-r- if SEty •CE STAj•;rt Si k\:�t3 �'I� eT \.+5. pp -L {-A�i� Iw `+t � �4�•\LpTitM OV O.•K AY(\.IT IS�TL MACTiNy♦ -R CeF S• �f V J ��" �.2•. -� , STiN� My iR6:u Dntel In 4f.Rf.N• ,t0�2 �,f �rLUilan-- e..�'A� Z6 IL}. i'^Iwk i'^iS IJ YCIL� lMF4K +pN I w�+6w i 1 11 ASOI •.t! S�t.TItN S• cA-s A11E/' coNU.\ns I+ J ` ,�� ,,• Lli1 ew (•1allFVtN cl'ZO<Ji1Nti �. GL \VM A� �� = Y = 11:c14 MA. 7 n9A1t . N;ff.J l} V21Z`I ptDrt. 1 / qnr% /� III F�Ai A. %�A7 t..QOfji iY7 N6C� GCO1lf• 7 t�•I/�s. 1.. tt. .416 �.PAYT L. Ow �e��w+A+v G.I.II �IJA 4tUfr4G.o TI /lJ Cl7LL �Artri.S pT ,{.OGA/"'t eK SER. oYf iN�w.e -/? � /z, A.4 c vW%f JO Awk j of N� // [ ,,{�� / // J• �ftGe AtIG 7/w Ae[JIK� 1 r.G /✓ /i /'t.� ✓wt �f1 Lirtf / O /«C.ea 74A f"t.PtTiAf fi% /° NJ.\�c , vex. e.0-I 6G di /A /�aIPUi •1 Jr ✓E.t7[ wG64 . 6t 3) %16�'", •r J'; w 6f 4.4 eW. /tt" /JiC.J 4 1 Two 11 � or' � LAvE t .ES W p we ✓: r wiel`K A.. f C Op �S nE.lKl .('KK.w �R IN /r /�(,/.J � O ✓/ O� ��� Ci/.� �Pi TL.f ,'f` �0 ,PEfic{GvT•�1� A�F/C Ab /i�'G /"f�q„twj GAulf s e . � Rw 7� c I No.iq t� Nt^ /� %'..v Af AI/ ytovKr. A..� t✓�wf" fttc' sfis) uv eA.Mrf 6e LA ✓lE' o� 7ZF J4r c.fu.. r./i 2t c✓; Il /FA �'�i /� �� /�•F.+ /J •/ d£•C /V(AK.C.W /Gni �/�/f� ✓6� J�KISG � 1..✓�h/ O� �.RJEIin �%FC•A� /y �A!< /�E /•QNiIJ/. /./ CAQO'.,tN� rr�i:.f.E /sic ,_{fou.+ dtI• ✓j rIXE ! %zEKf Nytlf �u+ 7w� /¢ �5w .Kt•.lf+f / IAKl 7� wVi �F+w aw,/ •m^VE 7L4A - f�.CSt f" 'nrwy (�.c ..v /HE t..ve•,/��J 6uf �%/ 4GL�/rG� i7F u�:.� fpG i f• 1. „KGAJ•E� �iGli�` %c // Jal� /9JIC'in� '�'tv2 A.v /p Yi �i4H~ aJ �� 6% Twr • r n%../ n':. lr baKt /9.rE .f6 / %.v/ Ji�w'•�L`' �i/�''al�/lxL�.I�c/vE OTC ra�K �..e/++S6d 7 �i* /:.... TXc"� N•rE A R� A: .I /�..i/ /�,r+l k!'o :4/`K Jt /l 144- fEKUicE AA: JN L 1 �/ ✓,F�o,ii /,.tea /+•+!+ �Ei'cN• _ �..GE �1`-`� 7394 1",z1ew ... ( Aga. (:ufA•... A . Pk V�EI n, a -oe,- t-3I- ;z= 0 N 1 1 -1''� Ab.VE in� e S�K�. ✓J 4n(�s�.it� i.n. p Mo✓6J In� �S 11 C.�7 � rL. C 1+ WAS nicE R.J • PLzAm <CJ` �E knew \�Ietin�l to L CAN SE�: My �NIE 1 �p✓ 5�111C. 7394 1",z1ew ... ( Aga. (:ufA•... A . Pk V�EI n, a -oe,- t-3I- ;z= 0 N i CiT[ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DA-88 August 15, 1979 TO, city COUncLI and City Hanagor y07M, Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: AP7EAI. Op NINOR DRVfAT_7N DO. 79-11 - HONE - A Minor Deviation for service Station sac -backs fur the proporty located on the Southeast corner of Baseline Avarua and Mailman Aveaus ABSTAUi=, T11s request was brought to the Planning Commission as part of the application for Site Approval Ho. 79-12, the davelopment of a pretestional office building, conversion of an existing single family residence, and the construction of a Service station at the Southeast corner of Baseline Avenue and Hellman Avenue in the A -P, Administrative professional zone. The Planning Commission approved the request for the Minor Deviation sliming the applicant to locate his structure a minfmm of 15' from the ultimate ri4tt -Of -vat'5 on Hellman and Baseline. DISCUSSION, The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required building set- back from 25' to 15' at two points n• the proposed structure located on the Southeast corner of Hellman lvanue and Bas.klina. (See Exhibit 1). As you Will notice from the exhibit, the structure has been ple=ad diagonally to the corm=' therefore, encroaching into the required setback only at two points. Wition1117, it should be noted, •.hat by the placement of this structure, it allow the applicant to propose a mime design for rervica stations, that has not been Sam in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It aim. provides for additional la+deceping above and beyond what would be requir_. for a 25' building Setback line. It was fait with the landscaping proposed for this canter around this particular building that the anaroachmene of 10' at two points of the proposed service stati" would not cause any visual bliqht or lover the aesthetics of the proposed Project at Baseline a,d Hallman Avenues. ROCWaMmATION, It is reccmmded that the city Council deny the appeal thus approving to Minor Deviation 79 -11 allowing the applicant to locate his stsnctnro a minimum of 15' from the ultimate right -of -ways of Hellman Avenue and Baseline Avenue. 11 ResioctfuAl�j submitted, JACK LAN, Director of Community Development JL,cc Attachment, Site Plan Exhibit 1 x. 6 � r • � -MN. wvwnj�.••1.I• ..y �.y. A. 4 �G� l :jIjba I•T <w A-11 p OPEP3i — NORtH—l� • 91TF- frFM%/AL No. 79 -i2 AI,IV hmt^ C?r-ViAnoti No. 79 -II ,. tl.iFY �'i� �,�i��t•. .. .. .... ..iMCi w{.�;i•,�iiiW :iYly � - ! IL IZ 7 �I I I� o e e...�- uyJ . 4 ; I I IZ 7 �I I I� o e e...�- uyJ . 4 ; I .tdasere tyro' + -� p- " ti+s � V x,'71 �- •, > ,k Bas O� I Y ^J'•Y L. • CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: August 13, 1979 TO, City Council and City Manager FROM, Jack Lay, Director of Commiity Development SUBJECT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDt�NT NO 79 -OlA - STRAND /COMia7HWF.ALTH - A request Cor n change from the present designation of industrial to service mm,arcial for property located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. ABSTRACT, This request came before the Planning Commission on June 27. 1979 and vas denied, after mnsiderablo dircussaon regarding land use, compatibility, traffic, n did, the however, the the industrial Councileaddia clarification to the Commission did, t usider, h, i Y The following General Plan text under tE. industzial land use category- additional statement is recommended: •It is the City's desire to encourage high quality development throughout the City. The City remgnizsa the importance of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue as the future major 'downtown' and consequently there is a Potential for high wlumos of traffic and ultimate development. The City's designation of a Minimum Impact Industry on the property at the southeast cer.,er of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue means tc encourage the development of industrial office/business office parks that are related to the industrial community, financial institutions, food park, and the like In this manner, the character of the use, and trip generation weld be more consistent with the pattern and scale of development intended for this intersection. The integrity of the industrial area is thus protected.' This report will cover the following considerations: A. Land Use Compatibility a. Traffic C. Character of the Area 0. Industrial Specif.c Plan DISCUSSION: Should the City Council approve this general plan amand,,ent as proposed. The applicant will proceed with a zone change for service commercial and an application for Site Approval develc{sent for a K -Mart facility and related stops. Should the amendment be approved in the mann•.r which the Planning Commission suggosts, the applicant would not be able to proceed. IAND USE COMPATIBILITY% I. the discussion of land use coraatibilitt three basic questions arises ?CZ- 1. Should the property be service commercial? If the subject property "to changed to service commercial it would allow a vide range of retail commercial S uses such as markets, department sterns, nrug stores, retail shops, auto repair, offices, service stations, restaurants, fast food and tha like. In -the past it has been the City's desire to maintain the south side of Foothill Boulevard for minlanm impact industrial. The north side of Foothill Boulevard has be,a indicatnd for service commercial to serve the northern residential area. In particular, the northeast coiner of Foothill and Haven nos been reserved as a regional center or major commercial center alternative, and the desire is to retain it as such. It stmuld be noted that John. Blaynoy and Associates. Consultants for the City's General Plan, have stated that it is their belief that sorvice commercial south of Foothill would disrupt the integrity of the industrial area and destroy the special identity needed at that intersection. It is unusual to find such a large amount of vacant land in contiguous parcels available for industrial development and such integrity should be preserved. Furthermore, if commercial establishments ware allowed in the industrial area, they should be of the type that service the industrial area and not retail trade. Should the property be Mixed Use? A mixed use designation on the subject property would allow such uses as fast food establishments, restaurants, bakeries, related retail shops. offices and multiple family Because the mixed use category is basically an option land use, there would be a distinct possibility that multiple family mould be developed on the subject Property[ the pousibility of multiple family useon such an intersection is not desirable. There io also a possibility for the development of offices and related commercial uses. 1 Should the property remain as is? If the property remains as industrial, it could allow such uses as light industry and industrial business parks. It is posuible, through batter definition of the industrial land use category that the Planning Commission could encourage specific uses such as industrial office/businoss office parks, financial, food establishments commercial recreation and related uses A simple amendment to the text of the Land Use Element would provide the necessary encou-•,gesent and guidance for future developers TRAFFIC& The discussion of traffic is more thoroughly explained in the City Enginoor's attached memorandum and the report prepared by Weston Pringle submitted under separate cover for the City Council's review. The basic finding of the traffic consultants' report Is that the intersection can be expanded to provide for the traffic projected by this development in conjunction with the development of a regional center at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard The report also points out that there is a need en carefully review development plans and proposals for excessive traffic volumes. Additionally, the study indicates that with no development cn this corner a significant traffic problem still remains with the intersection. The svcstion then becomes what use would best minimize traffic impacts at the intersec- tion. It is the City Engineax'e opinion that the property located on the south- i east corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue should reflect an office park or buwinsse office frvelopment or an equivalent traffic generation use in order to minimize the problems with the intersection. 1� f :01RACTEROF Haven Avenue n, FO thillaloulevatd acts asna to the City of Rancho Cucamonga• In addition, ra hlcally ve +t ont:anct Co the City. The finer" game °eignifieanetin athatafactralone. The the canter of the City and, thare[ore, along Foothill or importance uses to the image of the city that will character of the area crea,.is by the lend use$ Chat ,.re developed ]oulovsrd ano Haven Avonur is of m7 be created. As the Council is aware, th, re is a major $pacific plan underway for Terra vista, the Specific plan. located on the northwest Color of Haven Avenuo and Foothill Lewis Lewisysrd Significant coam;rcial areas and a v oraenCrarresidentiaCity'1alongs are of proposed for this 1300 n:re d °velorment The m� Haven and Pooa for Terra development hthatdwillobecome the implementation tl high quay y of development is desirable and Rancho Cucamonga. The prollfdr, tioi. of this type encoarag¢d The south side of Foothill Boulevard during the diseucsien Of percale oC ItnetaonPlan has e always beeleftain Southern aCniforniauvlthamiorevacanthpercal prima ]ndustr.sl land The integrity of this eras •hculd be park uses through Lib!° with tale intent- to If cosner�tal develop - Irons latent development of industrial and industrial o!lice perk usos ftetai coaasrclal be are not eouth went were be approved on :ho :routhets 'Omer d encouraget�l�eeialvdevelopments onven it would open the door for other raga 1!nit the intogri pmtSouth aid,olfcomothill oats onarheosouth side of FoothillI we suggest that the In land use remain industrial Of the industrial is aware, a =Jet study I!gEU RIAL SPECIFIC PVwh,v AeThis study Council w.ii create a specific plan establrahing area is currently underway iavelopme trial uses and related commercial and office uses it standards !or indus aistordplenningaolalarge acreagta of land, and rdiscourage sma11 loth aubdivieitri age greet the while also ere: Ling a proper irre and character for the area To allow commeuldaba dev°lopcont as an intrusion into the industrial aroa at thin point in time end ill-timed. Stould the scale industrial Store' athen c it sight be appropriate for the dcve.oper to approach the City attar the Industrial Specific plan has been adopted A.7ALYSIS, After a thorough revlev of the considerations involved es this tegnat, the Planning Coaaicsiun found that it vac in the City's boat L,Cdzest not to approve the applicants requeet. However. the appliVi3hes to ercouragorat9the out cents request has a question as to what type of development the City intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, specifically the nsuggest that the inxt der [to clarifse he Citt'slvouldit. thehel followln5 st tatiementadded d of e under the category of IndustrY, •It 's the City's dasir.. to encourage high quality development throughout the City The City recognizes the importance of the intersoetion of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Aveluuma tiafficuat ultimate doaai °cPMDt- The City's is designation ri " rim volume industry on property at the southeast cerner parka that are related to the industrial do Foothill IC• vmu and Haven Avenue moans to encourage the development of . ndustrial of!ico/business officO p food park and the like. In this community, finarsial institutions, ration would be more consistent manner the charazter of the use and trisay r �F with the pattern and scale of development intended for this intersection, • L`.o integrity of the industrial area is thus protected.` BR29TR ATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council 1) Deny the applicants requeati 2) Clarify the City's intent underthe industrial 1a S use category by adding the following statement to the Industry Section of the Land Use Tezts `It is the City's desire to encourage high qua} ty development throughout the City. The City recognizes the importance of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue as a future 'downtown` and consequently there is a potential for high volume traffic at ultimate development. The City's designation of minimum impact industry on property at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue manna to encouragn the development of industrial office/buslness office parks that see related to the industrial comawity, financial L ltutions, and food park and the like. In this =met the character of the use and trip generation would be moto consistent with the pattern and scale cf development intended for thin intersection, the integrity of the industrial area is thus protected.* Aasp ctful ubnitted, JACK LVi Director of C.mawitj Development JL:cc Attachments, Memo from Lloyd Hubbs Vicinity Map Minutes - Planning Commiselon Planning Corraisston Resolution • 76 �i TO City rouncil FROM- Beverly l.uthelet Flan please note, you have received a flue notebook entitled, 'roothill ?oulevard and Haven Avenue C,mnercial Center• -rrffic Study" by Weston Pringle and Associates This is a 1' part of this staff report. K t 7 E 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCMIONGA MEMOMIDUM DATE: June 27, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FHO,M: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDKENT NO 79 -OiA FOOTHILL -HAVEN CONMEMIAL CENTER TRAFFIC STUDY This menu is to review the traffic study prepared by Weston Pringle 8 Associates dealing with the develomtent of proposed K -Mart Corriercial Center located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue This report was previously submitted for departmental and Commission review. The Engineering Division has analyzed the report and feels that the impacts of the project have been fairly assessed and that the report has accomplished the - goal of thoroughly exploring the technical traffic conditions at the intersection i The Engineering Division does however disagree with a m3Jor finding of the report •ne technical analysis indicate+ that with or without the proposed coma cial dove Iopment at this location, the inter on taws ty v za ton factors will excee w. c is a po era ono breakdown �scr Ded n t e reDOrt as • "T-,nne cueues of rn c. unstable ow; Stoppages rationLrafTTC volume Findino number six listed in the report s�m, iary indicates, 'The intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Raven Atenue could experience traffic operational ,problems; however, „ctual volumes are anticipated to be love- due to reduced residential development and traffic diversion ' With this finding, the Consultant has identi- fied the problem, however, feels that the City will not develop out its current general plan at the level assumed in the report It is the opinion of the Eng neer- ing Division that general plan buildc,it could possibly exceed the figure used for the st:dy increasing the problem further partitilarly in view of the Terra Vista Plan and the changes in development density proposed in the Industrial Area Specific Plan Study. The report recommends that the intersection b^ designed with four through lanes, tvo left -turn lanes and a right turn lane for each leg of the intersection The impact of this configuration will c•eate 13S feet of street on each leg or the intersection This amounts to nearly double the existing intersection of Base Line and Carnelian Streets Streets of this width will involve lone signal cycles anJ traffic delay and will nearly prelude crossing by pedestrians The report points out a need to carefully review development plane and proposals fir excessive traffic volumes Experiencing In view of the fact that as more traffic data is being generated, all factors lead to the conclusion that the City should seek development proposals that reduce estimated peak flows and e volumes rather than exacerbate them. This problem will be further explored through the current Citywide circulation element and as a part of tie Environ- mental Report of tha specific plan for the Terra Vista Project. GENERAL PLAN AMEROMENT NO. 79 -OiA June 27, 1979 • Page 2 The study indicates that with no development on this corner, a .ignfficant problem remains with the intersection. The question then becomes what use wuuld best minimize traffic impacts at the intersection The table below indicates daily and peak hour trip generations at this site for the proposed projei.t Ifor industrial park useage and for office and business Of the three uses, it would appear that from a peak hour traffic impact evaluation, the best use of the property would be as an office park TRiP GENERATION FACTORS 20 ACRE SITE PH OAily PEAK TRAFFIC TR1\ 71011 22 K Hart Industrial Park 15,302 565 2 Office & Business 2,340 300.0 COHCLUSIOIIS 8110 REC01NENIlATIONS: The current general plan for the City may . resu t n excess ve tra c volumes at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. That land use plannin n the area should be developed to reduce this impact to the greatest exte possible and that overall Citywide circulation planning should involve care ul planning to balance north -south traffic throughout the City The property located on the corners of Foothill and Haven Avenue should reflect Potential regional center development and be planned W minimum peak hour traffic generation It is recommended that the southeast corner he reserved for office park develop - -nent or an equivalent traffic generation use Respectfully submitted, 4yddkuXbbs� City Engineer LH deb '`l F LKfi►T wow5eo ?f=Q0Nod- Cur U MAJO{-- i 0 Resolution stating that he development) shall conlition ell State DepartnenthOf ftealth ton Vice Health seed Flee Nors M11 reW Lrments. A motion was made by Cmmalssioner Carcin and seconded by Co®issicnar Dahl to approve Resolution No. 79-49 approving Site Approval No 79 -11 sublect to the conditions as listed, plus the following: 1. That the development hall se all State Department of Health T Y 2. Ten pariting spaces ahaJibe located on the east side of that building at A nd shall be labeled fee eesnnl use only ld ed nett close to the least two handicapped entrance of the building as possible AYES: CARCIA, UHL. JONES. TOLSTOY, RL'WEL vacs: BONE ABSENT: 13DHE NEGATIVE•DDCI.AEATION• A1a1 GENERAL PLAN AYEdTIHENr hYl. 79-OlA - 57T. ��JC0.`CiOh'17FALTH - A request Lor a change tram the Dresent deeignot ion o[ Itduatrial to :•env ice Coneercial for p- operty located on the southeast corner o[ 10van and Foothill Blvd • I=. Director of Coamunfty Development, visioned the staff report in Jack i. annl ryl Division Staff detail, this being on file in the Plec M that e the appltcants request be denied and that the City's latent b be clarified r under the industrial land use tategory Chairman Rmapal asked for questions few the Toaaission of the staff. Comissioner Garcia asked the City Engineer to review the traffic report for this area. LloSJ Oubbs, City Engineer, reviewed the report (o es a[ this Snt crs tttion r the Ctmotaster its itdt- cated the Englnecr is concerned with traffic volum Ulth this proposed development. the intersection w•:ld exceed these recoo- nendtJ levels fir acceptable or minimal opera[ton This is a very critical tot hes studieda in More s detail net only as it studied relates to t that aspec if ice system to be aect:an but to the entire city •.hat to the best plan to spread the traffic any mt throughout the system Ulth the regional center poasibtlity Ca the nortbeast corner of this intersection, i[ to recommended that the other inst the three 1 .a of this intersection be aintnized and would rec.•mme:J aya astablltiment of commercial an the three corners a"d that An office park posstblec traffic ageneration establi remain shed forrall tthreercorners. the lower Nr I m stated he wow lJ like to clarify that staff is addressing thes"'ves to 3 - Hart to else retail cusmercial establiclnent And not usetThere le avmarketnfor tlon of making any coements toward any particular June 27, 1979 Planning Commission minutes — ULJ this type of ma Ia Ch* City. Ys era only concerned that it bar located- in a, sdlwble Of in regard to traffic In the city. Staff is only addressing.. Itself to the inue of raasteret -t and one referring to the particular w&- Comtssidnet Garcia steed there is me a caregory in the present road Ordinance for SMestrfal Off ice /tastu ess Parks and asked if this cypW of zoning will be written into the new zoviug ordinanrr. xr. has idicAted this will be written into the new zoning ordinance sad. this type of me is correctly allowed is the miulmm lapact dirrriec and. !n tea x -1 zone. Chalroan impel open, ! the public hearing. Mr. John O'Mea• stated he is repressvting Strand /Ceomo®ealtb, [af sec Steel and the Gaon Corp. all awPeng proper[: in this area. xe Indict red Oxon Carp: Is interested in a cozbLPatlou office and light industrial with the noes gsctlapr slightly heavies to the loath. The proposal by Strand a for a 70 Sore zhoPpiug center which consists of a deparwmt stare, a tally rmco,,,,t, Insticwtiaoj. and retail shops. The city requested [hoc a traffic stdy Jos prepared tuclo 1, at In =cue of the nersai requfressats. The nalac �cay nys whw'& , e Par res tdautia2 traffic would be carried through the Industrial ate& to this develop- neat It is their oPlntfan they vlll net generate nay residaecial traffic throagh, the fedmtrial area. Maya SteaL bad originally planued to davelopr thr p, -opaty as a melon heavy rteel veer; hw cr, it seed abvicas to thus that than wauw. ofct the best location for this type me, pan Corp. plans to develop. 60 ecru ISizopaty troatltg reethill 1=0 general office and business part. ononr concerned about the quality of developamt on Fmtbill as it is a prtaary bustnas street for the city, 7hc7 cupport the general Plan anandmoC requested for the IO acres on the southeast turner of Ravin and Foothill, as it la their cethis will aaopl faent their development. A concern regwdlrg the arthi- ccurai quality of the development was brought up. They have Sdicated they will build as nice s edatw as Possible for this property, In regard to the,trat - fic study, it basically "am" the worst Poaslbie case. Thsy vary rarely anti- cipate crafIle reaching levels projected at the to ervoctlon, Ike cares brio• -- � assumes m ocher mrth/south alternatives and did net take lain be study b consideration: Mnlltkau Astor eu the heat, pith cvyps -.d to the traffic Solution, throbviom: uu jut ion it to reduce the density itself aW net the camarcial tauter. Another solution is to create &"I''bml meth /south Site, 2tires. It is by oplolon there weld be ore wrafffc generated during the peak boors with L developmenr ttun eoa,tefal desaLOpsePC. doatrial ofllea CGaaalsslauer Tolst -y stated the aesthetic goal Lty of vbethar chls eevter would- enhance this ptopetty over another use should be dtacrosed. Mr. O'Mcara lrllcated that vsvvr depends an Nut your mid sees for that turner. They would produca the highs= quality rumarcial covmvnity center as you would did, and the applicant is very wLLLLng to work with tie City In every way with regard to the development. Mr Ivan Stra.N. &pphlcaat, stated in regard to mahatiu, If he is all to build on this turner, he would want to develop a center which he vt owed ' 11 be• Proud of as well as the city, He stated be would be pleased to am,,,- our questions the onnsission may have. Planning CoaLslai r.cutes P10- Lmr 77. 1979 V� chat uantcd uhato pine oche dcbotcThis fee ad of td Lhe city for +sane r° or in out community that ue h ylavan and Gate stator focal po ins unistos sees of a cost comissionet Stag le diftil�t CO particular, at het Sthiss of ^t have a cants al the three bag all pt tba cornets tied cab 'cc to race unate to vas to tnccg tie yet° fort ive 801delin a eblact ivec 0 cy�pc ghats The goals lrAotDarac toRO uauvaassav, have Da developed Foat1.111 ant. as to what 6tD Go 270 °^d the be a uly idea SSpOted• the acres in Y1 go are being rtunity for entire 270 than the 0°nital S good oPP° rate the Vol ld be pore upuld be arhar to totes AS would 111L t° , it P ch® too4atat* tog S caking about atcY Nt Strand Ostcfa is P Staff co C,pm.tastoas roc out the entice property the Cpnnar but he Save ch fa 80 °1 tbuest corner nor this aim Ibis happy vt[1+ Lhe city to ach iha torO an this corner puns sou sad uotk rated ha etc utll el 4 tea V. a nice Pro R_flsrt devclopaans yi Frauk Or® ha L° favor Sava ^tag° 9°as tbla s. Aa 'rated with haven. Aa etac td the ti¢ ttdtca cod be useto che best ho scat[ °^yeibla Le g resident of A6K Cue sons area has he has OLc htghcstt ncendatd 40 to ate., the ace dug stated he he -treat , Stea UP Co the :1t Bob Sutton X11 bring thle be ttaEa 104h tea isn't coo set -backs f{On [hare is going to e proroT that they •LTato utll b° pSsiblc use 8S Sn6lcated u Comleston of foothill any highest p for cha city north ssible interest bring be a chraat to p a Y the College to the N "Seat PO Silt that that will a 1 devalopCRt 6006 not fLhto proposed development require ch t be n Mint, g nctateo funds fopt tpoe¢di to • the north u1 h e l0 Industrial Seel co co came o Ile h¢ the CCS,on� ad In diseusstone Sceran"I tat cant thcoush 6l I very d"elo¢ ant o ^could ba tranalat ed co his r me Cpiperce. ace 0t tCm Study as 9r °aenc l[ roc architect ]cE[ they arc- ,it- me 0t as toche tap traffic on this Bice has InteSritY on thsc costar he uodats! and Nu the if done ,otcluston be day 8 a it the developer 6sec not cometetal eon ca ®ereloalC t°mvrctclel^dpVeloReEnc state n0 closely looked I »stbla ns are ° des is Li :ng Chairman RcaP °1 closed Cent to no negati a of facts any type Cho [o[ tan 5 °r the audience. to th is light glwre baits no her com¢ncs from of chr YlannitF co�nity and Local public hearing' is the duct the this cccy "try the 1^� eavirptpenc nl needs C haw¢ t^ ob)eeti�ts of And Garcia et at ¢d it that etc 'action arch t1-e s°als and cc chic pto3 CnCOlthe Set Sc to the °last inter amply to careiullY ana19 r inch ss social our se °this tine does Nt Lhe address Ilo ucg °d t Comte slot T 4 *tc h0 secs st6 at this later ,action cha General plan further tlu. General Ylan• an6 all pr of acts Pro 9a and public that tc,C on not rant an the p°lear that they Raven ]ones et at ed duetns neat lr opinions loud t11 81vd•. C•�las toner at fppth peoCt° voiced t a aauth side m rnarc cal 0n June 27 • 1979 . 7 Ylsm1^g Cosm issf°n Ninuias �2 Commissioner Dahl stated since the General Plan has been adopted be has very strong fed -Ings that any deviation from her we have at the present time • would cause • conflict If this change Is considered at tills time we might as veil throw out the General Plan and start all over again. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would agree with Commissioner Dahl One of the reasons this city was incorporated was because V p Ono of the things the Central Plan meetings brought to 1. .,-. e,t this city needed Same Intensive planning. He is againrt taking a small piece of property no muter where in the city and changing it without a major study of the uhola area We have a large industrial area set aside and he would like this to rma % There is a lot of lam that is potentially commercial in other areas within our city_ Chairman Hempel stated that* Is A lot of need far additional commercial development within our city; however, there Is problems with that Intersec- tion This area has to be looked at more than just from 20 acres at a time. By changing this Industrial area to commercial could cause problems for the lnduscrial area. A cotton was made by Commissioner Tolatoy and seconded by Commissioner Dahl to deny the request under General Plan Amendment No. 19 -01A, clarify the Intent of the industrial land use at that intersection and Instruct staff to make a study of this Intersection and bring back some guidelines to the Commission AYES: TOLSTOT, DAHL, JONES, GARCIA, RENPEL NOES NONE ABSENT: NONE Mr Mogan stated a Resolution will be brought back to the Commission at the end of the General Plan Amendment hearings. In this Resolution the Intent of the General Plan in this area can be clarif Led Guidelines will be sec forth for this area and will be brought back to the Commission for review. * s e • a A Motion was made by Caamissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Coeissloner Garcia and unanimously carried to cove to Itm "I" at this time II.tG14LIA DEVELOPtfINT - Block wall requirement for Magnolia Center located on the southwest corner of 19th and Carnallan Jack Lae. Director of Community Devolornent, reported tills item vAs continued from the last meeting in order to give the Cammission an opportunity to review this glee He recommended that the Gimlasion require a combination of 1' and 6' wall on the east, 6' wall on the south, and a 6' wall on the west side at •his development with staff to work out the decafla AYES: RCMPEL, TOLSTOY, DAHL. JONES, GARCIA NOES: NONE ABSENT: DONE • a e a e e Planning Commission Minutes -12- June 27, 1979 CDIJ • RFSOLMION NO 79 -SI A MSOLVTIOH OP THE M"C'10 C11C✓AtON CFPT 1111tr COMISSION RECfp91EtDING AHENOC' AWvrED IWTERIM IAID USE, CC,RCUL TMION ONO r�U.D�I�.I�cC.tf FACILITIES et.fliENT CU ;ANGNGA GENEIUL PLAN MIEREAS. the City has eatabltshed the 2nd maetb+g in June 1v the 1977 Cenaral Plan Amendment hearing data for Planning Commission review, Al I.IICPFAS, Th. Rancho Cueemanga Planning Coagission hold duly advarttsod WVl to hearings on Jun. 11th end July 11th, 1779. and: NIIEREAS. eormanta were heard and considered both Pro ^' +i1 con re9a[din7 the roquestod General Plan Amendments YNYYY.A PWRIAN� lrnt•11SS100 THE RANCI" II^_tl, THER:FCRE.r�bEtIc�LCLty�Well aVVrove anandmont to the Gcnernl Plan dues har -uy recoame land use element as follower SECTION 1, For GeeneraI Fac L1��ent 19- slundmre the +ablest 'Imtustry.dtosa Circulation and read' The ur' reronn+;e1 •ha lrtort mcc It is tho City's desire to aneouragm hi7b earl sly love ol- mant throughout the CICY ul"con v�J .•+ern of the intersection of Fcot - at I eonseq• enr,, them l r a ae the future mslar down Potential for high volumes of traffic at utt•stTY 01 rol�ty Thm City's designation of minimum Iml•1ct u+dastry at the southeast corner Of oothl'trtil office /bualnes8 office encourage the development Parks that ere related kto htho l lke.la Inc` 1,1, rnnen + +,t1 +eW1 institutions, food W •.• mnre conetstent character o[ use and t[1F q encrat ion would 1this with the Patten and scale Of de" he induatrwan areal is thus intersection. The integrity "l t Protected 77 nlC nnnm tba 1. nd Use NaP for the SECTIO•l 2+ For General Plan Amendment nvenuo north none lip. Re8ldeer of to AllAHised Use lfroea111a9h1mad' Avenun to x Lemons an for 75_ acres of land ( Exhlbit Al SfLTIO'1 h For General Plan Amendment 79.011, uneml the hill, Vin map fnr an the southeast corner of Raker AvenuennolF for ^rho ®rolrr nd[r..m Funds, le itp ,rem 1,ow Paeidential to Hadfu+ Dm ^and naul...rd Lo Art" Puute end Baker Avenue to tBc Ncamngl Crock Chlnnr (Exhibit D) •e•CTIC41 d, Peeoamand adoptlen of a u net 79 JlAri :encrat Plane Am I.dmcnte7 ;nOleal Plan Amendments. Gans [al Plan Aaa+ximo and General Plan Amar:da+ent 79 -OID �� — ,.•• _ ._osssssss� rJ CITY of RANCHO CUCAt10NGA DATE, August 15, 1979 TO, City Council and City Manager rRGN, Jack Lem, Director Of Community Development SUBJECT, GENERAL PIX4 Afo:NNDMM NO_.79 -OIC - CITY OF PANCNO COCANONGA A request to change the present designation of high density residential to low density residential for the property located on the south side of 19th Street between Archibald and Yoat:,yst ABSTRACT, As the City Council will recall, staff was directed to prepare an amendment to the general plan to change the land use designation on the subject property described above. The recommendation of approval from the Planning Commission occurred On August 8, 1979 and is forwarded to the City Courcil for Chair consideration and approve DISCUSSION, The subject property of 6.6 acres of land is located on the south • side of 19th Street approximately 700' west of Archibald Avanuo. (See Exhibit -A-) The proposed amendment, if approved, would change the present dasignation of high density residential (15 -]0 units per acre) to low density residential (2 -5 units per acre) The reason for this amendment is due to the circumstances surrounding Alta Lome Properties request for high density residential zone change and the subsequent development The Planning commission has since denied the development rogues- and the City Council has denied the zone change. Because of those facts it is evident that the area in not acceptable for high density residential development and consideration of the different land use should be made. The subject property is bounded on the east and vest by single family - esidential development, on the south by a mobilehoma park and on the north by single family residenca and vacant property. The proposed amend,esnt would be compatible with the surroundin3 uses and would logically bring tr:ether the existing developments In the area RECC`IYENDATION, The Planning Commission recomands that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment No. 79 -OIE as requested. Rasps tfully tted. Community Davalopment 4 JI. cc AttdChmenta, LXatien NIP part I Initial Ltudy Planning Commission Resolution 86 .i �,... Www• GGNGRAL PLAN WF- 30MENT N0. 79 -0I E !�OEs m :emu 7•'v. "•'." "'tR a . Z4+4 .. �r•. _. s V f r7 L-A r CITY OF RNICIIO CU=:0':GA I111TIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Rovi" Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of throu determinations: 1) The project will have no - environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be Filed, 7) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant Giving further Information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: APIP/L}�ICANT'S NAME ADDRESS, TEJ,EFtIQNE:jl P4�111IYVtV 4G' li T R 1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIIIS PROJECT: LIST OTIIER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL. REGIONAL, STATF AND PED£RAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUC11 PERlIITS: •% �� I -)8( PROJECT DESCRIPTION • OF ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OP EXISTING At.O PROPOSED DUILDINGS, IF ANY: DEECRIDE THE ENNIMMIMITAL Sr7TTYNG Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORHaTION ON TOPOGRAPHY. PLA:7IS MEW, ANIMUS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCCt1IC ASPECTS, -USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TIM Or.SCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTIt1p,ISTRUPTYRE4 AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECE SARY SHEETS) Aa A 0 In,Y �hi ,: 5v(t.;gc�i►z! (YI t <I((•",T>1f� 11cFC (•� Is the project, part of a larger rru)ect, one of a serirs Of cumulative actions, which althoLgh individually mall, may as a whole have significant enviromnental impact? I -2 88 0 WTLI• TIIT� R r CT' YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? J 2. Create a su`i:itantial change in existing noiso or vibration! 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (Polito, fire, water, sewage, ate.)! q. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations! 5: jemove any existing trees! Clow many? i G. Create the need for use or disposal of T toxic subst hazardous flarrablesa or explosives? toxic aubetaneea, I Explanation of any YFS answers above: of IMt'JRT :.irt'c if esidential units, complete l complete then form t onnthe next page. CERTIFICATI", I hereby certify that the statements furnisher above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this inilijl evaluation statemts. an best of my ability, and Goal the ci information presented arc true and d correct to the L•..st oC my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additionol iufore Linn may he requ•rcd to be submitted before nn adequate ev3nlation can be made by too Dewtoers•nt Review Committee. Data 6 �L� Signatur�i3,1 u�•~� Titln �"� RESOLUtION IRE. 79 -56 RESOLUTION OF THE RANC110 CUCA90tR.A pl.1NNltr. CO.`YISSION RECUeiNEN')INC APPROVAL OF f. FJ:rRAL ,v PLAN AMENDIENT NO. 79-OIE TO TIE INTERIM LAND USE LLEMENr OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA GENERAL PLAN 411ERFAS, the Rancho [Eton. t Planning C•xmisslon hold -1 duly aJver- tisLd public hearing on August N, 1979; and WHEREAS. co®enta were heard and tonal rrm, mth pro and con regard i q; the requested General Plan Amendment. NOV. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ranrn,• Cuc nmry;a rlannlle; Ctwsles'in dots hereby recommend the City Council approve the follev4+g Han: to the I.Lerim Land Use Element of the Rancho Glr,nanga Genrrni Elan: SEC1fON 1• Central Plan Amendment IIo 79411r, mord trip land use map for approximately 6 6 acres of land lorat Ld m, the &sum side of 19th Street, approximately 700' •,axt of Archibald Avenne from high deltsity resident 1 2 01-30 units per acre) to low density residential i2-5 dwelling units per acro) fix Ill 1, 1L "A") SELTl011 2: The Planning 001m,,1891or, fins reviewed tbp onvirmmcntal • assessment for this prole t and recommends niorrion of the N,Ttattvo Do'Iaration for General Plan Acledaent No 19-Olt APPROVED AM AF'OFtED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 19 ") PLANNII4 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAIICHO CUCANOM.A By. Peter Toolletoy A��I T TTLSI. Smretary of tha Planning Correles ion 1. TACK LI M. Secretary of the pl:uulinq comll :. I,n, , r ti". Pl.v ..r I n. h.. Wr conga, do hereby certify that the forego l ng R, so nut dun w w duly and rceularIj introduced, passed, and adopt ld by ;h.• Plannlrc ' mmfhnb,o or the Clty of Rancho Wc=01190 at a regular newt lIg of the ria,ming Lomi Mon Held on the 8th day of August, 19/9. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, JONES, 1:15707 NOES: WMYISSIONERS: NONE 4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RMPEL, GARCIA W. C1Ty OF RANCHO CUCJS10N0A • H=RANDUH DAs, August 15. 1979 TOi City Council and City Hana9er Fram, JaeA Lam. Director of Community Dovelopment m- -Bjwr, Rtsot P10N or THE C1Ty COUIrIL APPRfNltlG GENCRAL PLAN Ug�5DD7f4 Attached Please find a proPC Resolution of the City Council officially approving to 79 -OlA. 79 -01C. 79-OlD and 79 -O'E' LY a l� eilma eo Cenral Plan AmendmeiaV, the 3eneral p:m appoved r state official. Pe this and Previous meetings' that the City Council adop= The attached eLd ...••mot No 79 -01A. 79 -01C, l�iciallysapplo�9 C,aaeral Plan Aso'+.-- - 79 -01D and 79 -019. Reapoc fully I.LitCed. JACK 11Z�OlL /to[ o Comunity Davelopment JL.cc Attachment. City Council Resolution • 17/ RESOLUTION NO ,r- v 7 OA RESOLUTION Or THE WU:CHO CUCANONOA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING THE ADOPTED INTERIM IA -6) U, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIESS ELE✓g7F1'S CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS. the City has establaehfo the�i9 Comlssion review6eanda 1979 General Plan Amandment hearing date for WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comission hold duly advertised public has =inga on Juno 27, July 11, and August B, 19791 and wi:EAEAS, assents were heard and considered ',oth pro enj con regarding the requested general Plan anendasnto, and WHEREAS, tka Rancho Cucamonga City Council held dull advertised public hearings on August 1, and August 15, 1979, and WHEREAS, convents were hand and ca,sidered both pro and con regarding the requested general plan amcndmentA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE5OL.ED that the RanCM Ncemanga City Council 0 hereby amend the General Plan Lend Use elemants as follows, • SECTION 1 -r ^enwral_ Plan Amendment No. 79 -OXA amend the test of the Land Use, Circu`ation and Public Facilities Element under the subject Industry to read, 'It is the City's desire to encourage high quality development throughout the City. The City recognizes the importance of the intersection of Foothill a +ulwiud and Raven Avenue as the future major "downtown' and affic davaloapoent. Theacity , a desitgnation ofigminim,m impactssindustryton the ult"ate VOIUMMI Of property located at the southeast corner of Foothill and Haven means to encourage the davolOPment of industrial offico /busineae office parks that are related to the business co®anitY• finoncial institutions, food park and the 11Y.s In this manner, the character of the use and trip generation would be more consistent with the pattern and scale of develop- ment intended for this intersection. The integrity of the industrial irea is thus protected' SECTION 1, for General Plan Amendmant No. 79-01C amend the I." Use Nap for the northeast corner of Navas Avenue and Highland Avenue from Nixed Use and Low Density Rosident ial to all Nixed Use from Highland Avenue to I.exon Avarua for 75• acres of land. (Exhibit 'A') SECTION 1, For General Plan Amendment ISO. 79 -01D. Tmand the Land Use Nap for the southeast corner of Baker Avenue and Foothill poulevard fray Low Density Rasidenti..l to Hedius Density Residential from PooU.ill Boulevard to Ai row, Routo and Baker Avenue to the Cucamonga Crack Channel. (Exhibit •B'I. qz CITY OF RANCBO CUCANOI7G NEWTANDUH Date: August 15, 1979 To: City council and City Manger Pron: Jack lm, Director of Omaunity Development Subject: EXTENSION OF RESIDENTIAL BUDDING MORATORTtN ABSTRACT: The residential building moratorim that was extended In March of this year Is due to expire on August 31, 1979. The extension of the residential moratoria wvs to allov the City time to develop and adopt a Growth Nauagwent Plan. The Plan has been developed and will begin the public hearing process before the Plam.ra C=Isaiou on August 22. 1979. Our =ici"tion is that the Growth Nanag®ent rim would be adopted before the end of this year. The City Attorney has prepared an extension to the residential building mratorim extending the expiration to December 310 1979. Should the Growth Managament Plan be adoptea, vi +or to the expiration date, staff would return to the City Council with an ordinance to renova the moratorim. •• t• :ecoanaodad that the City Council adopt the attached ordinaoca extending the residential building mratorlum. Reap ctful ]p baitted, IV JACK LAN. Director of C)=unity Deralopment JL: BKN :om Gi. CITY OF NANCHO CUGNONCA 6 NQSOBAM M Date: Auguac 15. 1979 To: City council and city Nnnscet Eros: Jack Ism. Director of CFanity Devolapnent Subject: EXTENSION OE RCSIDEM" 8011DI:7C MORATORtUH ARSTRACI: Eae resident Sal building moratorium that Una extended in cn of this Year to doe to ez, to 9O l" the 31, y time to develop develop and T1:r mracoT Sum vas he alloy the City vill of the reaidmtial matt Plan The plan has been developed and public hearing ptocesa before the Planning comission on August adopt a e Growth c hearing 22, 1 [M Pu 22, 1979. our anticipatfnn L that the Crnvih Naoagmmt Plan vatld be adopced before the end of this Year• Attorney has prepared tin 'tewlou Dace be the r1979. Sal building he extending the esPlrat ion to Deember 31. 1979. Should the Ibe Cicy irat fun data, ata[! would eorato[i+aa adopted prior to the eaP Crovth Nanagmmt Plan be doP to remove the moratoriim, return to the City Cava ii vith an ordinanu It Ia rew=orded that the City Council adopt the attached ordinance eccmdiog the cealdmtial building mrstorim. Reap ctfu''ll ! beitted. �✓w�1� JACf IAN. Director of Comaunity Devayepnmc J4 B=.rm f T ORDINANCE NO. 6-4--6 AN ORD :NANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAlx7NGA No.64tAND D CLARINRTHE URGENCY ORDINANCE GENCY TUEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as fellovsi SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds that: A. Further reparations ofsaacomprehot,eive growth and management program for the City. B. The expiration of ordinance No. 64 by its terms on August 1, 1979 will not be in the best interest$ expira- tion date shouldf h be s extended as hereiafter provided. SECTION 2: Section 6 of Ordinance No. 64 of the city of Rane o cucamongo is hereby amended to read as follows,_ 'SECTION 6, The moratorium imposed by this Ordinance shall expire— Docemfer 31, 1979.' SECTION 31 This ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, health, safety, and wslfare stateein sect immediately hereof ordain ordinance No. 64 and shall take SECTION 4: The mayor shall sign this Ordinance and Clerk the City C er s all attest avithindfifteee (15) days shall cause the same to be published after its passage, at least once in The Daily 1- 0ntario,nawapaPer of general circulation published in its C Y California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, REPROVED, AND ADOPTED, this _ day of • 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: ,. ccycer 95 ME 110R ANDUl1 T0, Ci•• Council FROM Br ly Authelet DATE; August 10, 1979 At the time of Putting the agenda together, information for the Project Esperanza had not been received Therefore, backup information will follow at a later date �v�G.a.^ l�O,r.o,ato.•'> �� Ott p.(s• to ! f W�rl It f,,, ter, joS • K aee...sc ' Witt, I ,� /ItF� 4 /lam' 11�R �vgL.T,eAha.+S e oe- A- 0+- CA ,Pe- VC Ott A/Oii».d "r !c �0`IC pU* A�t .� CITT OF RANCHO COCANO N}210RANrtM Date: August 15, 1979 To: City council so& City 444aget Fns: Jack L®. Director of Cx=unity Develotaent Subject: METHODS FOR INFRASIROCII REEI FINANCING II a INDUSTRIAL AREA The Industrial Ctsmittee of the Chamber of rcmeerce desires to contribute $7,000.00 to the City to hire a consultant to conduce a study to ea®ine alternative ways of financing infrastructure ieprovments vitbin the _ industrial area other chat, the formation of spatial districts. Such a study can detemim vays of financing such impvovments over the long tam and contribute to the ewana,tc viability of the business co®ut,ity. Given the aftemath of proposition 17, such a study in the industrial ,/1 area mula have cfryv1Le significance. Therefore, s_aff nmmehds l" th.r rh,e ciev Council accent the am of $7,000 to ma.uct o a. P as V described above a to direct staff to develop t e coatracit a — a8rxemeac for future City wuncil review son apprrhv Relpectfulll submitted, -Il^ dlw� JACK LAY, Director of Coaunity Davelopment JL:m ,U 4*11 9 Rancho Cucamonga . Inddstrial Development Trust Account August 9, 1979 Jack Ism Director of Comuaity Dev. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 R.C.. Ca. 91730 Dear Jack, This is to inform you that the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Development Trust Account is holding $7,000.00 which sum may he turned over to the city of Rancho Cucamonga upon demand. -his $7,000.00 is to study and report ways of financing, fire stations, railroad crossings and storm drains within the industrial area other t =Ln ecial distrSc ta. Thank you for jour cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, David H. Humphrey Sigrator R.C.I.D.T.A. WR UN 0 CITR 02P gA=0 cummomh Date; August 15, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager From: Jack 7.m, Director of Ctmunity Development SPECIFIC PLAN Subl ett: APFg07AL OP PHASE 2I cr THE IbUOSIRIAL As the City Council rlll recall, the Industrial &Specific ific[plan for the industrial of Commerce is funding the dcvelopmenc o[ a aces of the City This project vas divided into the I pusses• Fbase 1, currently uadervsy. develops a traf fie mode! for the iadustrel area• Food 2 is the develoPlmt of the specific plan itself. Fhase 3 rala�caIIet -teed to control and drainage issues in them industrial staff is requesting that the acczpl fish Phase 2 t a �nrcim:ation of the proleet and direct staff to City Council approve reeaents for City 11>uncil approval develop the program and ecar a, itca�+ld be mphasised that while the funding at a later meeting ree, the program is a City F.OgTm and that • is through the Chamber of Cetme oaa individual or group• a City spe :if In Flm is being developed not for tmv the RE�theaP[ol° t acc°pththe $4)6000 p�i[iccPlanrco°crlbut ion. and direct staff to develop the Program and we agteements for future City Council review and aPProval. Rosy tfully a fitted. r JACK IAN, Director of Community Development JL -.= Y71 Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Development :rust Account August 9, 1979 Jack law Director of Community Doe. City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 R.C.. Ca. 91730 Dear Jack, This is to inform you that ve amve on deposit in the Trust Account S43,000.UO to pay for Phase 2 of the Specific Plan for the industrial area of our city. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, l David H. Humphrey Signator R.C.I.D.T.A. 10 • I E L July 5, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meatus 1 CALL TO ORDER. Thu regular meeting of the City Council was held to the Multi- purpov.o Ron= at Carnelian Elementary School, 7501 Carnelian Street. Rancho Cucamonga. on Wednes- day, July ?, 1979. The meeting was caller' to order at 7:12 p.m. by Mayor Jams C Frost who led in the pledge to the flag Present: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikele. Palombo, and Mayor Frost. Also present veto: City Manager, Lauren Wasserman; Interim City Attorney, Sam Crave; Anslstant City Manager. Jim Robinson. Community Developmont Director. Jack I=-. City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Absent: Councilman Bridge. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by H1Yels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes of June 14 and June 20, 1979. Motion carried 4-0 (Absent: Bridge) 2. A \T:OUNCF.4enS. a Tuesday, July 10, Historical Commission will meet at 7:00 p m. to the Library Conference Room. b Monday. July 16, the Planning Commission will conduct the first in a series of public hearings on the proposed Growth Management Plan. Meeting will be In the Library Conference Room. c lack Whitney, President of the Board of Directors of the Foothill Fire Dlstriet,passed away Wedoesday, July 4. Funderal services will be held on Friday. July 8, at 2:00 p a. at Stone Mortuary to Upland 1. C=41TTEE REPORTS. a. Advisory Committee. Mike Zinkia from the Alta Loea Subco®lttee reported their subcommittee had just mot and minutes would he forthcoming They concurred that the joint meeting scheduled with the Council for July 19 should be cancelled at this time since many on the committee would be on vacation. b Historical Covv_esion. Report by Leonard Gorezvea, Chairman, emphasized the need to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Arthur Bridge as soon as possible 4. rj1jSE7f CALENDAR. Requvat to aelate check No. 02072 from the Warrants to Internal Revenue In the amount of $114 05 and to adjast the total accordingly. Motion: Moved by Polombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar as corrected Motion carried 4-0 (Absent: Bridge). ,1 City Council July 5, 1979 Page 2 a. Approval of Warrants in the amount of $40,565 42 Register No 79 -6-29. b tction an the followln5 bonds: Tract 7709: Release of Bonds t, Mantred Hall Performao -e Bond (road) $72,000 Labor A Material (road) $16.000 (The roads were accepted by the Leunty on 10/25176) Tract 7830: Release of fonds to 16no Connt.w,tlen. Inc Performance goad (road) S16,000 Labor A Material (road) $18.000 (The Toads were accepted by the County on ) /27/70) Tract 7913: Release of beads to Novell Realty Perfomance Bond (road) $30,000 Labor 4 Material (road) $15,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 1/19/70) Tract 7939: Release of bonds to Fred H Koch Performance Bond (road) $30,000 What t Material (road) $15,000 (The road. were scceptid by the County on 314/70) Tract 7963: Release of bonds to Home Construction, Inc. Performance Bond (mad) $28,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $14,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 8/4/69) Tract 7964: Release of bonds to Hume Constmcticn. Inc Performance Bond (road) $24,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 12/15/69) Tract 7967: Release of bonds to K3troyak Homes, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $58.000 Labor 6 Material (read) $29,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 4/6/76) Tract 7968: Release of bonds to Crown 1 /Leventhal. Inc. Performance Bond (road) $26.000 Labor 8 Material (road) $13.000 Labor 6 Haterial (water) $ 8.000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 12/18/72) Tract 8024: Release of bonds to Matreyok Ramea. Inc. Perlomanee Bond (road) $72,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $36,000 (The roads were accepted by the Jounty, of 8/)/70) Tract 8054: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performnce Bond (road) $36,000 Labor 6 Matarfal (road) $18,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/19/70) Tract 8085: Release of bonds to frontier Land Company Performance Bond (road) $44,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $22,000 (The roads were accepted by the County of 10/26/71) ",act 8089: Release of bonds to Crowell /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $40,000 Labor 4 Material (road) $20,000 (The roads warn accepted by the County on 9/27/74) 0 L L u City Council Minutes July S. 1979 Page 3 Tract 8209: Release of bonds to NorVada Land Company Performance Bond (road) 560,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $30,000 (The roads ware accepted by the County on 6/L4/71) Tract 8266: Receive of bonds to Crowll /Leventhal, Inc Performance Bond (road) $32.000 Labor 6 Material (road) $16,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 7/24/72) Tract 8295: Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Butllere, Inc. Performance good (road) $54.000 Labor 6 Material (road) $27,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 10/24/72) Tract 8429: Release of bonds to Crovell /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $14.000 Labor 6 Material (road) $ 7,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 3/12/73) Tract 8440: Release of bonds to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $46,0•.10 Labor 6 Material (road) $23,'100 • (The roads were accepted by the County on 6/11/73) Tract 8520: Release of bonds to Vanguard Buildero, Inc. Petfo ran ace Bond (road) $88,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $44,000 (The reads were accepted by the County on 10/9)73) Tract 8521: Release of bonds to S 6 J Industries, Inc Performance Bond (road) $28,(%00 Labor 6 Material (road) $14.000 Ferfa ma ace Bond (water) $22,000 Labor 6 Material (water) $11.000 Performance good (sever) $24,000 Labor 6 Material (sever) $12,000 (The roads were accepted by the County an 1/29/73) Tract 8583: Release of bonds to Levis Moeas of California Performance goad (road) $28,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $14,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/6/74) Tract 8607: Release of bonds to Cmn,all /Leventhal, Inc. Performance Bond (road) $72,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $36,000 Perfornance Bond (vattr) $20,000 • Labor 6 Material (water) $10,000 (The road* were accepted by the County on 10/1/73) Tract 8649: kelease of bonds to Darrell L. Vinberry Performance Bond (road) $22,000 Labor • 4aterial (road) $11,000 Perf ace Bond (water S 7,900 Lobo, 6 Material (voter) $ 3,950 Pprformance Bond ( sevor) $ 5,300 ' Labor 6 Material (sever) S 2,650 (The road* ware accepted by the County on 1/28/74) I City Council Minutes July 5, 1919 Page 4 Tract 8668: Relnaeo of bonds to Vanguard Builders Partornance Bond 'mad) $50,0,j0 Labor 6 Material (road) $25,000 (The Conde •ere accepted by the County on 7/8/74) Tract a730: Rel.•.ia of bondu to 8 6 I ladustries. Inc Perfomanco Bond Goad) $46,000 Labor 5 Nnterial (tond) $20,000 (The rooda were accepted by the County on 10/20/75) Tract 8796: Release of bonds to rhompson Associates Psrfortaance Bond (road) $120,000 Labor 6 Material (road) $ 60,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on 5/3/76) Tract 8805: Release of bnnda 'o Trevor Development Company Perfomance :and (mad) $146,000 Libor 6 Mater,41 (ro.d) $ 73,000 (fi•_ roads were accepted by the County on 11/14/77) Tract 8806: Release of bonds to Trevor Development Company Performance Bond (Roa:) $180,0() Labor 6 K3terlal (road) 1 90,000 (The roads were accepted by the County on tl/14/77) Tract 881' Release of hands to Rent Land Company Libor 6 Material (.oad) $74,000 Labor 6 Material (ewer) S10,000 Labor 6 Material (water) $19,000 (The roads were accepted by the Council on 9/6/78) Tract 8910: Release of bonda to Bob Jensen Builders, Inc Performance Bond (road) $92,000 Labor 6 Material goad) $46,000 (The roads were accepted by the County 6/73/75) Tract 8884: Release of bonds to Hamish. Morhan 6 Causey Performance Bond (sever -oa site) $13,000 Performance Bond (setter -aff site) $4.1,000 Perfroeuaocc Bond (water) $42,000 Tract 9!o': Release of bonds to Mark III Moans, Inc Performance Bond (Sever -on site) $28,000 Performance Pond (sever -off e,te) $64,000 Performance Band (water) $25,000 Tract 9268: Release of boa✓. to Hark III Homes, Inc. Performnce hand (rower) $50,000 Performance Bond (water) $35,000 Tract 9269: Release of bonds to Mark TIT Homes, Inc. Performance Bond ($ever) $49,000 Pe:freaanca Bond (water) $67,000 Tract 9422 -2 Release of bonds to Marbirough Bonita. Inc. Performance Bond (sever) $36,000 Performance Band (%star) $52,000 Tract 9446: Release of bonds to Ringsvay Constructior Company Performance Bond ( sever) $60,000 ' Performance Bond (water) $82,00() Tract 9448: Release of bonds to Mce *er Development Company Performance Bond (sever) $29,000 Performance Bond ( vater) $28,000 city Cevnc it Minutes July S. 1979 P4B0 S :•trt 9634: Rolesso of bonds to Chavanne Realty Performance Band (sever) $28,000 Performance Bond (water) 931,000 Tract 9135: Aceept roads and release bonds t: Regency Estates Perfnemaneo Bond (sever) $30,000 Performance Bond (water) $27,000 r Perfor. nce Bond (road) $68,000 ITraci 9136: Accept roads and release bonds to Regency Estates Performance Bond (ewer` $22,000 Performance Band (water) $29,000 Performance Bond (read) $64,000 Tract 9337: Accept roads and release bond :n Butler Development Performance Bond (road) $170,000 Tract 9422: Accept roads and release bonds to Harboruugh Domes, hC Performance Bond (sewer) $ 29,000 Per ormanee Bond (water) $ 39,000 Performance Road (road) $166,000 Tract 9280: Release of cash staYing deposit to Bob Jenson Bunter, Inc. Cooh Staking Deposit $4,000 Tract 9350: Release of Cobh staking deposit to Loma Ranch Homes Cash StaklnR Deposit $1,400 Tract 9582 -1 Accept roads and release bends tc the Door Creek Co. Performance Band (water' $111,000 Performance Bond (road; $166,000 C. Design San ices for signal inatallaUOn at Bsven Avenue and Amber Street. Authorisation of Kahle, Perry 6 Assoclatss to provide design services in the auount of $5iO plus printing costs for sigma's. d Stree, vacations for a portion of Arro)v Vista Avenue. Adopt a Resolution of intent to vacate an extension which dead -ends at the south boundary of the professlonal office complex being constructed on the southeast corn.¢ of Base Llne and Cornell" Street RESOLUTION NO. 79 -53 A RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAINCHO COCAMN'GA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. TTATE OF CALIFOFNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVENIJE. AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. V -O::i FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. a. Street vacation for a porrfon of Hellman Avenue. L Adopt a Resolution of Intent to vacate a pertlon of Hellman Avenue dedleltion wh•ch is now vnt. wsary to the needs to the public due to the realignment and additional -ledleations mado on the vest side r City Council Hinutes July 5, 1919 PAge 6 79-56 REPh,UTI0Y W. A RESOLUTION One THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MC110 CUCAHO.MMA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS INTFJITION TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLYAS AVENUE AS SINN ON HAP NO. V-002 00 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF WE CITY CLERK. h .•neral Plan Amendment %a. 79 -02 - City of Rancho Cucamonga A request for an amendment to the Circulation Element of the I General Plan to nrmove and certasslfy 7th Street in the area of Turner and llellmn and to reel glfy 6:1% Street For public hearing before the City Ccuncll us July 18, 1979. R Zone Change Nn. 79-05 - Coral Investment A zone charge from R -1 to A -P rot property located o't tl•e southwest corner of Gasellne and beryl Street. For public hearing before the City C uncl' om July 18, 1979. h. Zone Change No. 79-06 - Weetuay Iwestaents. A zone clauge from H-R to H-1 for property located on the south sidz of 8th Street, between Hzllmn and Archibald For publie hearing before the City Counell om July 18, 1979. 1 Zone Gunge No. 79-01 - Alts Lone Properties A tore rhange from R -1 to R -1 for property located on the south side of 19th Street between Amethyst and Archibald. For Public hearing before the City Council om July 18, 1979. - Amendment to Sign Ordintan,e To set July 18, 1979, for public hearing to amend Sign Ordinance to clarify sign provisions for shopping centers. S. PUBLIC HUAINGS. $A. Revenue SharinR - (second hearing) me Wasserman presented the purpose of the meting std the staff's recomneodatlon that the rever." sharing funds be used to offset a portion of the city's total . cost for providing law enforrameot services in Rancho Cucamonga Staff had received three requests for a portion of the funds As follows: a. Request for paramedic services by • group of envier citizens of Rancho Cucamonga. b. San Bernardino Office on Aging had presented a request for fund. to Improve bus store for the elderly, especially the handicapped, and for a discount om water rates. I c. Project HOT made a request for funis. L H.ryrr opened the cretin- for the public hearing. City Council Minutes July S, 1979 Page 7 Project HOY group spoke first Ti:ose addreseing the Cnuncil wore Arnold Urtlago, a resident of Cucamonga. i— Sam Naestas, former director of Project 1101 I Jerry Hen,andes, lunlor Supervisor for Project HOY Several young people In the program Dr. Armindo Navarro, Executive D1^actor of the National Institute of Coa®cnity Development of which Project HOY is a part He ntated they C were only asking for $1,000. Lynn Caurer, a VISTA worker, presented the new ,rogrm that vas to be C114- bitched in the Fall which would replace Project HOY. • San Bernardino Office on Aging vas represented by Me Rance N. Lavern, Area Coordinator. She read A statement to tha Council which had been presented to each councilman In writing, prior to the meeting. A copy 1s on file in the City Clerk's office Kathv Cuayante presented a request for a portion of :ho funds to assist the Foothill Fire District In establishing a free certified paramedic service :or the area Petitions with sixty -nine names had been received by the City Clara Mayor closed the public hearing since there were no other comments. Mr Wasserman said that funds for project HOY cwld tome from the contingency tend if Council wished. Hontes from SB-325 transit funds could help out la" the bus stop problem. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to reter the request for paramedic services to the Foothill Fire District for consideration and possibility of placing on the ballot Hatton carried AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost NOFS: None ABSENT: Bridge Motion: Moved by Schlosser, sec :ded ny N' to refer request for water dis- counts to the Cucamonga County Water Motion carried AYES: 3chlosser, • Mikels, Pslombw, Frost NOES: None .: Bridge Action: Schlosser and staff will look Into the box stop problem and came back with a report and cost estimates Mr. Holley also stated that Don Newtons from the County office of Community Devolopmenc felt [here were Block (•.rant lands available to modify bus stops LHatton: Moved by Paiombo, seconded by Mikels to reserve $7,000 from the contingency fund, pending a rev.w by Council and city staff of Project HOY's request, and that any appropriation of funds be xuhjcct to Councll approval at a laic. data. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, ralombo, Frost. NOEQ. None. ABSENT Bridge. 5" Adoption of Bellet Mayor oponcd the meeting for public input There being none, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Pnlombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve and adopt the 1979 -80 B:.dget. Motion carried AYES: Schlnsser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT. Bridge. City Caunell Minutes July 5, 1979 Page 8 SC. _nrdinaneo Extcnd in± Moratorium on Ad0t Bustnesmcn. Ordinance No. 45 -A will extend the moratorium on adult bestnoss to February 1, . 1980 Meeting Was openud for public input. There hoinR none, the public hearing was mud Hotiont Moved by Palumbo. se -onded by Mikels to adopt Ordinance No 4i -A and to walvu entire reading. Motion carried AYESt Schlosser. Mikols, Palumbo. Frost. NOFSt None ARSFNrt Brt�ga Title and aumher read by Wanserman ORDINANCE NO 45 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF nIE CITY OF I RANCHO CUCAHCNGA. CALIFORNIA. EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 6A. Community Development Block Grant. Report b7 Bill Holley. Council made ae amendment to the agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the County of San Bernardino at its June 20 meeting. Such amendments were not acceptable by tee County Don Nevcome trom the County Office of Community Development was present to answer . quartions from the Counefl. Motl^n: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Schlosser to author::e the mayor to sign the agreement with the County as submitted to the city. Motion carried AYESI Schlosser. Mikels. Palumbo, Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Bridge. RECESS. Mayor called a recass at 9t15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9125 p.m. with all members of the council present but Arthur Bridge who had been absent from the entire ceeting. 68. Cooperatton AR dement with the San Bernardino County HcusinR Authority. Report by B'll Oollev Don Newcome frcn the County Office of Commtmity Develop - mot was �vnilabl.• to answer question$. Holton: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palumbo to adopt Resolution No 79 -56 authorizing the Mayor to execute the agreement with the County dousing Authority ind to valve the entire reading. Notion carried AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, Frost. NOCS: itikels ABSENT: Bridge. Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -56 A RESOLUTIO4 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE APPLI- CATION OF THE HOUSING AtMtORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR PRELIMINARY ICAN FOR LO'A -RENT PUBLIC DOUSING; APPROVING TRP DEVELOPMENT, CON- STRUCTION AND OWNERSHIP Or IDW -REHI HOUSING iiton T5 OF NOT TO EXCEED 10 DWELLTHG UNITS; AND APPROVING THE FORM OP COOPERATION ACREEMEhr BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON'GA ANTI THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND AUTHORIZING ITS EXECUTION. 0 City Council Minutes July 5, 1979 Page 9 6C. Crant Funding for Stem Drain Construction. Report by Lloyd Hobbs Staff requested approval to participate in a &Tait Ioan program from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of storm drains. This is a Joint proposal With the Chino Dash Water Conaervatlon District, the San Be rnnrdino Countv Flood Control District, end other West Valley cities. Request Includes .m allocation of ;2,000 from the storm drain fees for the preparation of Notice of Intent to apply Motion Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Hlkels to approve participation in the pro- f posed grant Program and to allocate $2.000 from the atom drain fees for the preparation of a Notice of Intent to apply. Disbursement of said funds to be approved by Council At time of execution of agreements with the County Flood Control District Motion carded AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Frost. NOES: None ABSENT: Bridge. 6D. Landscape Maintenance Districts. Report by Bill Holley and Lloyd Hubbs. These districts at- for new tracts and tracts under construction. Herman Re=pel, Chairman of the Planning Comlesion, expressed concerns of the Planning Commission regarding the establishing of these districts He felt there was a need for citywide participation. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to instruct staff to begin pro- ceedings for the formation of Landscape and Lighting District No. 1. These districts to encompass the tracts submitted to council in a memo from Lloyd Hobbs and Bill Holley dated July 5, 1979 Motion carried by the following: AILS: Schlosser, Hlkels, Palumbo. HOES: Frost (expressed opposition to taxing just the new residents of the community ) ABSEYf: Bridge 6E. Contract for Traffic Striping Services. Report by Lloyd Hobbs Presently traffic striping services are being dine under the city's annual maintenance contract with the County. Response to requests has not been satisfactory, therefore staff was recommending that a contract be negotiated with Safety Striping, Inc eroposals had been received few three contractors and Safety Striping was the Iw bidder Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve that a contract be negotiated with Safety Striping, Inc based on the quoted prices for fiscal year 1979 -80 Motion carried .'YES: Schlosser, Hlkels, Palumbo, groat NOES: None ABSENT: Bridge. • C 6F. Planning Comotas lone re Resolution for Reimbursement. Mayor Frost stated he had requested the resolution be drafted Since the planning Commissioners serve as a State requi•a,.cn,, he felt some of their expenses should be reimbursed This should not be expected by other volunteer organizations in the city L Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to adopt Resolution No. 79 -55 with necessary provisions to ,ome from the contingency fund and be transferred to the appropriate departmenta. budget Motion carried AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Frost NOES: None ABSENT: Bridge City Council Minutes July S. 1979 Page 10 Added item: Transfer of Lions Park property from the County to the City The County of San Bernardino and tha Cucamonga Dlstrl.•t Lions Club have agreed to trannfer owner- ship of Lions Park and Its facilities to the City of Rancho Cucamor ^a Notion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Mikal4 to approve the transfer of Lions Park property and authorize the mayor to execute the deed Motion carried AYES: Schlosser. Mikels. Palombo, Frost. NOES: Nona ABSENT: Bridge. 7. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS. Mr. Crowe reminded Council that the City Treasurer and City Clerk's issue should be concluded by August — September at the latest R. NEW BUSINESS 0 a. Council: Mayor presented a request declaring July 19 as Buster Fllpl Day The Chamber of Commerce will be hovering him at a banquet that evening. • Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombn to declare July 19 as Buster F11pi D -y In Rancho Cueamonga. Motion carried AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Frost %OES: None ABSENT: Bridge. b Audience Kathy Cuayante expressed opposition to the selling of fire- works far the 6th of July There were so many fire* and accidents this year. Schlosser said the problem should be turned over to the Advisory Committees to review. 9_ ADJOURYI[ENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn the meeting in hanor of Jack Whitney. Motion carried AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo. Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Bridge. The meeting adjourned at 11 :00 p m. Respectfully eRespectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk L • August 1, 1919 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Hooting r— L. C. \LL TO ORDER. IThe regular meeting of the City Catnctl was .told In the Multi- Purpose Room at Carnalian Elementary School, 7501 Carnelian Street, Rancho Cucamonga, an Wednes- day, August 1, 1979. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p,m. by Mayor James C Trost who lad in the pledge to the flag. C Present: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo, Bridge, end Mayor Front. Also present were: City Manager Laure- Wasserman, Assistant Interim City Attorney Robert Dougherty, Community Development Director Jack Lam, and City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs. Absent: Assistant City Manager Jim Robinson. Approval of Minutest Hatton: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes of July 18. 1979. Motion carried 5 -0. • 2. ANSOUNCEMEM(S. a. Jon Mikels announced that SCAO Executive Committee would be meeting August 2 -3. b Foothill Fire District meeting on August 14 at 7 :00 p M. c. Advisory Committee Joint meting with the Council on Thursday. August 16 at 6:70 p.m. in the Library Conference Rem. d August 29 will be a special presentation by the William Lyan Company, e. Jon Mikels reported that the Historical Commission was still looking for some- one to fill the vacancy created by the reslgnetion of Arthur Bridge. f Staff presented the following changes to the agenda: Additions: Aut:,orization to solicit bids for traffic signals. Delotiona: From the Consent Calendar as follows — (f) Tract 9137: Accept roads and release bonds to Regency Estates (g) Tract 9298: Accept roads and release bond to Manfred Hall. (f) Tract 9370: Accept roads and release bond to Valle Verde Development Co (k) Tract 9429: Accept roads and release bond to Valle Verde Development Co. (1) Tract 9274: Release bonds to M.J. Brock 6 Sons (o) Tract 9617: Release bonds to M.J Brock 6 Sam g. Mr. Wasserman Introduced Dan Hendricks, the new Associate Planner 3. COMMITTEE RoPOPT_S L a Advisory Cornittcc - none b. Historical Comiss Lon - none City Council Minutes August I. 1979 Page 2 • 4. CONSENT CALENDAR. a. Approval of warrants In the amount of $143.349 JO - register no. 79 -8 -I b. Request Authorization for Trip to Sacramento. Authorization is requested for the City Manager to nttend a meeting Involving I representatives of the Building Industry Assoc , local school districts and city representatives, and tha Governor's aisles, of Planning and Research In Sacramento, August B. 1979. Purpose of the meeting will he to continue dis- cussions with the Governor's staff regarding 8vlool capital improvements via assessment districts. c. Request Authorization to attend Employee Relations Comllte� M:at.na, Authorization Is requested for the city manager to attend the quarterly meeting of the League of California Cities Employer - Employee Relations Committee it Sacramento. August 23. 1979 d Tract 9589: Acceptance of improvement securities. The tract consists of 15.1 acres and 36 lots on Red Hill. Developer 1s Dennis Renter. • Performance bond (road) $120,000 Labor and Material (road) 60,000 Monumentation 3,000 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNLt APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREL -iVT, IMPROVE2ffHT SECURITY. AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9589. e. Tract 9447: Release cash staking deposit in the amount of $1,650.00. I Item removed g. Item removed. h. Tract 9342: Accept roads and release bonds to Griffin Development Company. Performance bond (water) 9 36.000 Performanco bond (road) 268,000 1 Item removed 3 Tract 9424: Accept roads and release bond to Greenberg. Stark 6 Assoc.. Inc. Performance bond (road) $ 36,000 k Item removed 1. Item removed. M. n Item removed Appeal - Site Approval No. 79 -12. Develooment of professional office building and service station to be located on the enutheast corner of Hallman and Baseline within the A -P zone Assessor's f:rcol No 208 - 431 -14 Sat August IS. 1979 for public hearinh o. Appeal - Minor Deviation No 79 -I1 A minor deviation for service station set -back/ for property located on the southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman Set August 15, 1979 for public hearing Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mlkels to approve the Cone ent Calendar as amended Motion carried 5-0 City Council Minutes Anxust 1 '979 Page I 5. PUBLIC HEARIUnS %A. lone Change No. 79-05 A ton- Mange from R -I to A -P for - operty located on the anutlwost -or •cr of Baseline Beryl Street by Coral Investments. Ordinance r No 82 before Council for second reading IThe muting was opened for public hearfng. There being no comsenta, the heart" vas closed C Motlont Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 82 and waive entire reading. Motion carried by fnllwing vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Frost. NOES: None ABSENT: Nona. Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 82 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`IONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208 -OIl -63 FROM R -1 TO A -P FOR 0.56 ACRE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST • CORNER OF 07b LLINE AND BERYL STREET. 58. Zone Change No. 79-06 A sane change from M -R to M-1 for property located on the south side of 8th Street, between Hellman and Archibald by Westvay Investments Ordinance No. 81 before Council for second reading. Staff requested the second reading be act for August 15 since recordation of covenants, conditions, and restrictions had not yet been completed Hatton: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mlkels to reset date for second reading of Ordinance No 83 to August 15 Motion carried 5 -0 5C. Amendment to Sign Ordinance. Ordinance No 65 -A before Council for second reading Jack Lam presented s summary, of the purpose of the amendment which clarifies wording relating to monument signs. Meettng was opened for public hearing. There being no comments, the hearing was closed Notion: Moved by Nfk•_le, seconded by Palombo to approve Irdttarce No 65 -A and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None ABSENT: Now Title and . number read by Wasserman + ORDINANCE NO 63 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY + OF RANCHO Ctlr WO'ZA. CALIFORNIA, AMENEINO ARTICLE V SECTIONS 5 4 1 AND 5 4' OF THE SICK r ORDINANCE NO. 65 FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES L5D. Street Vacation of a portion of Arroyo Vista Avenue. Report by L.. vd Hobbs Mr Hubbs stater that notices had been published and posted, and no objections had bee., rece'ved Meeting was opened for public hearing. i {+' Randy Bond, General Hanager of Edison Company, said prowls lane needed to be made for the street light at the end of Arroyo Vista Avenue They had sent a letter 47 to the Engineering Departcent stating this City Council Minutes August 1. 1979 • Page 4 Mr Ib,bbn sold the light van to he relocated farther mouth Mr hand concurred coat if this were done. there would be no problem There being no further comments. the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mlkeln to approve Resolution Na 79-61 and to valve the entire reading. Motion marled by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser. Mlkels. Palombo. Bridge, and Front NOES: None ABSENT: None. Title and nunbcr read by Wasserman RESOLUTION YO 79 -63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, COUNTY OF SAN SCR04RDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATE? A PORTION OF ARROYO VISTA AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON MAP NO V -001 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 5E. Vacation of_,ortion of Hellman Avenue. Report by Lloyd Hubbs. • The meeting was opened for public hearing Mr. Randy Rend, Edison Company general manager, stated there was a 12 KV line at this location. There needed to be a 30 -foot easement if this were to be vacated. Mr. Hobbs said this would be accomplished There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution 'a' 79-64 and I valve the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, l Palumbo, Bridge, Front NOES: Nikels. ABSENT: None. Title and number read by Wasserman RESOLUTION NO 79 -64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAY BERNARDINO. STATE 07 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF HELL"MM AVENUE, AS SHOWN OM A MAP NO V -002 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGt 5F. _Cvneral Plan Mendment No. 79 -OIC by Jack Sylvester A request to change • density designation for land northeast corner of Haven and Highland Report by Jack Ism. Meeting was oleneu for public hearing Vito DeVLto Francescc, actorrey for Mr. Sylvester, asked about the recordation procedure He was instructed to proceed with the recordation himself and bring the Information in to the city before the final resolution is adopted. I There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. L Motion: Moved by Palumbo, seconded by Bridge to approve the amendment to change the designation from mixed use and low density residential to mixed use for 75+ acres of land located on the northeast corner of Haven and Highland Avenue Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mlxels, Palombo, Bridge, and Front %DES: None ABSENT: None. City Council Minutes • August 1, 19 9 Pago 5 54. t:enoral Plan Amendment No. 79 -OID by the Cltv of Rancho Cucamonga. A reques, [o change Josignation of iw done ity ies idunt Lai to odium density residential lot property located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Baker and the r Cucamonga Channel. Report by Jack Lm. Meeting was opened for publ,c hearing. There being no comments, the hearing was Closed Notion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser for approval of general plan C amendment No. 79 -01D. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, Bridge, Frost. HOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: Mikels (he had property In the area) 6. CITY MA.9ACER'S STAFF rUORTS. 6A. Resolution Author[zing Concract for Deposit of Honies The resolution authorizes the Director of Finance, and /or City Manager, and /or Mayor to enter Into contracts for deposit of monies. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikele for approval and adoption of Resolution No. 79 -61 and to valve entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Hlkels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None ABSENT: None Title and number read by Wasserman. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C7.7 OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT FOR DEPOSIT OF MONIES WITH THE BAhTC OF AMERICA NT 6 SA. 6B. Street Lighting Conversion Agreement. An agreement with Southern California Edison Company for the conversion of the street lighting system from primarily mercury vapor luminaires to energy efficient high pressure sodium vapor Conversion will take a five -year pe�tod Randy Bond, general manager of Edison Company, vas present and answered questions. Dan H,ndricks, Aasoclato Planner, spoke in favor of the conversion He stated &"-oral communitles it= which he had come had made this conversion, and It was .,Ll received. Motion: Moved by Polombo, seconded by Nikels to approve the conversion and authorize the mayor to execute the agreements. Motion carried 5-0 6C. Solid Waste Management Master Plan Amendment. The city had been requested to approve a plan amsndmert for the limited expansion of the Heaps Peak Refuse site located between Running Springs and Sky Forest on State Highway 18. Mr Wasserman .ntrodured Mr Esechnr, Assistant Director of Solid Waste Management for San L Bernardino County Mr. Escobar addressed Council and answered questions. Motion: Moved by Schloseer, seconded by Palombo for approval and adoption of Resolution No. 79 -65 and to waive entire reading Motion carried by the following vote: Al -S: Schlosser. Hlkels, Palombo. Bridge. Frost NOES: None ABSENT: Nona. Title and number read by Wasserman. City Council Minutes August 1, 19:9 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 77-0$ A RESOLUTION OF Tur CITY COUNCIL OF TIIC CITY OF RAN710 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLAY AMENDML'MT OF TIIE SOLID WASTC MAYAGEHFXT PLAN FOR SAM BERNARDINO COUNTY TO PROVIDE FOR THE LIMITED EXPANSION OF IIFATS PEAK RFFUSE SITE LOCATED BETWEEN RUNNING SPRIGS AND SKY FOREST ON STATE HIGHWAY 18 AD. Traffic Signals at Etivanda and Fourth Street. A request from the County Road Department that the City contribute Its proportionate share of $4,000 total for the installation of advanced signal detection at Etivanda Avenue, north and south of the intersection with Fourth Street The city's portion would be $1,000 Report by Lloyd Hobbs Notion: Moved by Palo:rbo, seconded by Hikels to approve the recommendation and authorize that $1,000 be taken from the Road Naintenanco contingency fund for the city's portion for the signals Motion carried 5 -0. • 6E_Fis.al impact Model for Rancho Cucamonga Report by Jack Lam He Ian pointed out that the City has budgeted $7,000 for the program and that $43,000 of the funding would cam through the Chamber of Commerce Ongoing expenses in future vents vr,ld be approxirately $4,000 per year 'lotion: 'loved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to approve the development of a fircal 1xpact model for Rancho Cucamonga, a °thorlre staff to develop the program and contr- ictual agre_ments for city council approval, and approve the expenditure of he budgeted $7,000 for the program. Motion carried 5 -0 Added Item_ Authorization to Seek Bids. A request to solicit bids for sign +ls at [liven Avenue and Amber Street at Chaffey College Total cost to he $70,000. The college has $5,600 to contribute toward the project Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve authorization to seek bid, lot signals at !Liven and Amber Motion carried 5 -0 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Mayor presented a proclamation declaring Leukemia Week which he read in full. • Council discussed how to handle proclamations in the future Me Wasserman pointed out that most cities did this routinely without coming to Council for "PR" purposes Mo•lon Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo for the Mayor and City Manager use their discretion on signing proclamations without coning to Council Motion carried 5-0. b The Council had received a letter from Carol B Taneubsum, attorney for Gary A Kortepeter, regarding a request to address the Councll regarding Parcel Fop No. 4471 After sow discussion, the Council referred this back to the Plan- ning Cemixston and set Septcmoer 5 for a hearing before the Council c Lloyd llubbs asked Council to Select a representative from Council ro serve on t cerralttee to Interview or the selection of a contractor for the North Town street ieprovement project. Melton: Moved by Palambo, seconded by Schlosser to appoint Arthur Bridge as the representative 'lotion carried 4 -0-1 (Bridge absta:ning) U S. rITY ATTORNEY REPORTS. None City Counell Minutes August 1, 1979 Page 7 9. WJOURhMNT. No[lon: Moved by Palumbo. e•conded by Schlosser to adjourn. Fthe wrlon carried S -0. Meeting adjourned at 8:87 p n. IRespectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk 6 i L 1.