Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/09/19 - Agenda PacketJ - , ti M Ci AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpos, Room 7105 Carnelian September 19, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the City Council agenda oust be in wrltlny The dead. ino for submitting items is 5:00 p.m. on Ch.. Thursday prior to the first and third Medr sday of oath month The City cle,k -s office receives all such items CALL TO ORDER A PLEDGE TO FLAG. B ROLL CALL Mikels_. Palanbo__. Schlosser_, Bridge_. Frost__ C APPROVAL OF IIINUTES September 5. 1979 and Augus: 29. 1979 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS a Council b Staff. /%-.a,4 ya 3 CC?1iITTEE REPORTS a Advisory Committee b Historical Commission 4 CONSENT CALMAR. rho following Consent Calond.0 items are expected to be rcutlne and non-controversml rhgy will ba acted upon by tW Council at one time without discussion. Any council mnaba'. statf ermbc , or interested party may re4uest that an Item bo romuvod from the iunsent Calendar for later d,sc,ussioa. a Approval p�rrants Jr. tpe amount of x&95.97. Register vu 19.9 -19 i :� Gity Council Agenda -2- September 19, 1979 • b Claim again_t the Cit in the amount of $30,000 by Sarah 2 Jeanie Petrey a orwar a to City Attorney rney Tor hanaTing C Oesi na lion of Vo tin Delegate for the League of California 4 nua on erence. It is recommended that the voting delegate for the League of California Cities Annual Conference in San Francisco be Mayor James Frost. It is further recommended that Mayor pro -tem, Phillip Schlosser, be designated as the voting alternate d Aoproval of Agreement for Serv,ces with Sedwa Cooke for 5 c e comp et on of Genera P a,i anc preparation of EIR and authorize Mayor to sign the agreembnt Total cost 1112,000 e Permission to seek quotes and purchase one (1) truck - ^_ APproVe-a—i -n-U Budget f A royal of contra with MKGK - Request for approval of 26 contract or a isca ct mpac, Model and authorize Mayor to sign agreement Total cost $50,000 9 Ap roval of A ee rTnt with Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - 73 Keg or approva of We trans er of funds to the c ty for the Interim Community Industrial Plan and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement n Approval oapf A regiment with Rancho Cucamonqa Chamber of Coerce 76 Ae`quest prova an aut or ze 3or to s gn agreement to transfer finds in the amount of 143,00 for the purpose of the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Model i Set October 3, 1979, for public hearing for Zon._ Change ZONE CHANGE NO 79 -08- MERIDIAN - A Change of zone fro^ A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to 14-2 (Heavy Industrial) for 38.56 acres of land located on the north side of Arrow. 1.300' east of I -15. J Request Approval and authorize Ia or to Si i In annual r ?newal 9 of Cooperation Agreement for Community OeveloFe-5t B70ik Grant Funds. k Acceptance of Parcel ra 5194 - The Parcel ,iap was tentatHely 82 approve y the City Engineer on July 1G, 1979. The land division is located of the south side of Ninth Street west of Hellman Avenue consists of 6.2 acres and 8 lots. The con41thins of approval required the development of a new street named "Flower" The developer. Howard Hucks, has submitted bonds for security as follows 1 LJ 0 2 City Council Agenda -3- September 19, 1979 Performance Bond (Road` $17,000 Labnr b Haterial (Road $17,000 RESOLUTION NO 79 -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NIR'9ER 5194 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5194) 1 Release of Bond for Count Nlnor Subdivision W77 -0703 brthwest corner o 9th Street an Carne ian treet It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the Bank of America to release the $26,000 letter of credit in favor of Douglas Hone, Kathleen Hone and Douglas Gorgen n. Release of Bond for Count Minor Subdivision 71 -0559 out east corner o Base ne and rc d It is recommended that the Cit/ Council direct the City Clerk to notify Bank of America to release the set aside letter of 58,200 in the lame of Douglas Hone due to the replacement by bonds from Diversified Investment. n. Resolution of Intent to Vacate a Portion of Banyan Street Tract It is recowended that the City Council approve the Resolution of Intention to vacate Banyan Street and set the public hearing for October 3, 1979 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF BANYAN STRFET AS SHOWN DN HAP NO V -003 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 84 85 88 91 92 City Council Agenda -4- September 19, 1979 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS ' A. Zone Chanqe No. 79 -06 - Westway Investments A reque.t to change the zoning from M -R to M-1 for property located on the South side of 8th Street between Hellman and Archibald Avenues (1^ , 0•:DINAACE NO 83 (SECOND READING) """1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING AS�,SSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 201- 171 -07 AND 209- 171 -20 FROM M -R TO M -1 FOR 18 75 ACRES LOCATED ON THL5OU7H SIDE OF 8TH STREET BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBLAb AVENUE. B Ordinance No. 70 -B An amendment to the original Historic Preservation Ordinance to inclide designation of "Points of Historical Interest." ORDINANCi NO. 70-B (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 70 CREATING A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMPU SSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECT!', EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO DENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C. Ordinance No. 85 r� An ordinance decla -ing certain acts to be unlawful within p,.alic parks in .:ie City of Rancho Cuc,monga ORDINANCE NO. 85 (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C,rY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UNLAWFUL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CITY -OWNED OR - OPERATED PARKS OR OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF 0. An Ordinance establishing the Residential Gro wth Management an ORDINANCE NO. 86 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PA14CH0 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GROWTH 14ANAGEMENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMUENT IN THE CITY OF RA1.'CHO CUCAMONGA. 96 97 98 99 102 104 City Council Agenda -5- September 19, 1979 • A resolution establishing a Residential Assessment kat ng Srtem. RESOLUTION NO 79 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 112 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS - RENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY 6 CITY tWIAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. Zoninu Determination for Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association. 126 - (� `/Q (Continued from 9 -5 -79) Reauest for zoning determination as to whether cr not the Popoff Association use is allowable in the R -1 Zone W. B. Staff P�ro�ppoosal for an Ordinance rovidlna for the Control, _140 i r� troTTection. awn 6�1 o e use, C Office of Traffic Safety Grant 160 • i Recommendation: That the City Council approve the concept oT Te grant program and confirm its support to continue the program upon termination of the grant. r /ia" D Award of Bid for Computer Services 163 HaM� E Award of Bid for City Vehicles 164 7 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 8 NEW BUSINESS a. Council b. Audience 9 ADJOURNMENT Ll 0 August 29, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA JOINT CITY COUNCIL /PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Spec.al Fleeting CALL TO ORDER - PLANNING COIVIISSION Chairman Rempel called the Planning Commission reeting to order at 7:17 p.m. CALL TO ORDER - CIT'. COUNCIL Hayor Frost called the City Council meeting to order at 7:18 p m. 2 ROLL CALL Present' Planning Commissioners Dahl, Jones, Tolstoy and Chairman Rempel • Absent Commissioner Garcia Present Councilmen Schlosser, Mlkels, Bridge and Hayor Frost Absent: Councilman Palombo j PRESENTATION OF WILLIAM LYON COMPANY SPECIFIC PLAN A presentation was made by SHA and Associates of the proposed project encompassing approximately 1,500 acres located in the vicinity of the northwest intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 the majority of tie property eithin the °pecific Plan area is owned by the William Lyon Company of Orange County Following question and answer session the meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned upon motion by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Jones at 9 02 p.m. The meeting of the City Council was adjourned following a motion by Councilman Schlosser ane seconded by Councilman Mikels at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully Submitted Lauren t1. Wasserman City Clerk AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAY,(RiGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary Carnelian ry lti- Purpose Room September 19. 1979 AGENDAAGHNDA ITEMS -- NOTE: All Item submitted for the City Council agenda - aaist be 1n writing The deadline for submitting !to® :a 5:00 p.m. on the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month The City Clerk's office receives all such items 1 CALL TO ORDER. A. PLEDGE TO FLAG. B `POLL Cjp.LL Hikels�. Palombo�,, ScAlosser�. Bridge \ Frost. C APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 5, 1979 and August 29, 1519 s • 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS a Council b Staff ? 3 COtg MEE REPORTS a a Advisory Comnittee b. Historical Commissior. 4 CONSENT CALENDAR: t The tollowlnq Consent Calendar items are orpecccvl to be routine an I non- controvarsial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one { time without discussion. Any Council , staff somber, or interested parq' way rogues[ that an Stem tom be Do mo rovad from the j Consent Calendar for later d!scusslon. a AnOroyal of Warrants in the amount of $197.895.97. Register No 79 -9 -19 • City Council Agenda •2- September 19, 1979 b Llaim a aia ainnst the City in the amount of $30,000 by Sarah 2 Jeanie Petrey eb�n+a�d t —o City A torney�or ar ndTing c Designation of Voting r,le ate for the League of California 4 Annual Conference. It is T� ruled that th Ling gelegate fo he League of Califor a Cities Ann al C ference in Sa Fr gqcisco be Ilayor Jam Frost t is further recomme ded tfat Mayor pro -tern, Phillip Schlosser. be designated as the voting alternate LX d Approval of Agreement for Services with Sedvay /Cooke for t e comp et i neral Pan and preparation of EIR and authorize Mayor to sign the agreement Total cost $112,000 e Dermission to seek notes and purchase one (1) truck - 9 proved in 9 9 -BO Budget. 1L f A royal of contract with NKGK - Request for approval of 26 _\ cont%yCt or a isca Impaet model and authorize Mayor to sign agreement Total cost $50,000 9 A royal of Agreement with Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce - 73 equesR t for approval of the transfer of tunas to the city • for the Interim Community Industrial Plan and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement h A ro yal of A re with Rancho :ucama,n a Chamber of Commerce 76 equest approva an aut or ze Hzyor to s g� agreement to transfer funds in the amount of $43,000 for she purpose of the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Model i Set October 3. 1979, for Public hearing for Zone Change ZONE CHANCE NO 79 -08- MERIDIAN - A Change of zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to 1W (Heavy Industrial) for 38 56 acres cf land located on the north side of Arrow, 1,300' east of I -15 J Reguest Aooroval.gnd a,ithoriz I'ar to sign annual renewal 79 Of Co ton Agreement for Cumtrun ty OeveloGnent Block G -ant FunLs k Acceotance of Parcel Ma��i5151-94 - The Parcel Nap was tentatively 82 approved by the icy Eng r on July 16, 1979 The land divi•v,on is located of the south side of Ninth Street west of Hellman Avenue consists of 6 2 acres and 8 lots. The conditions of approval required the development of a new street named "Flower" The developer, Howard Mucks, has sut+m.tted bonds D for security as follows: 0 E yb L f City Council Agenda -3- September 19, 1979 • Performance Bond (Road) $17,000 Labor d Material (Road) $17,000 RESOLUTION NO 79 -76 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA, CALTFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5194 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5194) n u 1 Release of Bond for COnnt Itinor Subdlvision W77 -0703 as Tffurthwest corner 07 9t Street and Carne an treet It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the Bank of America to release the $26,000 letter of Credit in favor of Douglas Hone, Kathleen Hone and Douglas Gorgen m. Releas, of Bond for Count Minor Subdivision 77 -0559 88 out east corner o Base Me an rc a d It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to nccify Bank of America to release the set aside letter c" $8,200 1.1 the name of Douglas Hone due to the replacement by bonds from Diversified Investment n Resolution of Intent to Vacate a Portion of Banyan Street - raee It is recommended that the City Co,mcil approve the Resolution of Intention to vacate Banyan Street and set the public hearing for October 3, 1979 RESOLUTION NO 79 -75 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERIARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VA11TE A PORTION OF BANYAN ;TREET AS SHOWN ON MAP NO V -003 FILE IN THL OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 0 i t� City Council Agenda -4- September 19, 1979 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Zone Change No. 79 -06 - Westwav Investments A request to change the zoning from M -R to M-1 for property located on the south side of 8th Street between Hellman and Archibald Avenues ORDINANCE NO 83 (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOIIGA. EALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUlBERS 209 - 171 -07 AND 209 - 171 -20 FROM M -R TO M -1 FOR 18 75 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BT11 STREET BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND ARCHIBLAD AVENUE. Ordinance to. 70 -B An amendment to the original Historic Preservation O ,*dinance to include designation of "Points of Histortcal Interest " 96 97 ORDINANCE NO 70 -B (SECOND READING) 98 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 1 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 70 CREATING A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COIV1ISSION TO ACT IN All ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS. STRUCTURES A SITES AND TO IDEUTIF� PERSONS OF HISTORiCAI SiGNIFICAIIC TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C. Ordinance No. 85 An ordinance declaring certain acts to be unlawful within public parks in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ORDINANCE NO. 85 (SECOND READING) f� 99 AN ADIUANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO .11� CUC1TOhGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UNLAWFUL C1 L WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CITY -OWIED OR - OPERATED PARKS OR O'HER RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF �// D. An Or limUL" establishinn the Rgsidentk Growth Hanaa5nt 102 C1SI0 ORDINANCE 110. 86 (FIRST READING) /104 All CUCAMONGA, OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 1 \ `%% CUCAYOHGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GROWTH HNUIGEMENT PLAN (�y`1\�' \�� (1/_ TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y A 9 City CoonLil Agenda 6 7 S. 9 -5- September 19, 1979 A resolution establishing a Residential Assessment t ng system RESOLUTION NO 79 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIrY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS - HENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. Zoning Determination for Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association. (Continued from 9 -5 -79) Reauest for zoning determination as to whether or not the Popoff Association use is allowable to the R -1 Zone. B. Staff Proposal for an Ordinance providing for the Control, Z0Tlect %n, and- 6isoos C. Office of Traffic Safety Grant Recommendation: That the City Council approve the concept o the gran program and confirm its , sport to continue the program upon termination of the g, art. D. Award of Bid for Computer Services E Awa -d of Bid for City Vehicles CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT NEW BUSINESS a. Council b. Audience ADJOUR11MENT 112 126 140 160 163 164 �, z • August 29, 1979 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JOIN- CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COPNISSION MINUTES Special Meeting 1 CALL TO ORDER - PLANNING COMBIISSION Chairman Rempel called the Planning Corission meetirg to order at 7 17 p.m. CALL 10 ORDER - CITY COUNCIL Ilayor Frost called the City Council meeting to order at 7:19 p.m. 2 ROIL CALL Present. Planninq Commissioners Dahl, Jones. Tolstoy and Chairman Rempel Absent: Cormis•.ioner Garcia . • Present Councilmen Schlosser, Mikels, Bridge and Mayor Frost Absent Count lman Palcmao 3 PRESENTATION OF WILLIAM LYON COMPANY SPECIFIC PLAN A presentation was made by SWA and Associates of the proposed project enccmpassing approximately 1,500 acres located in the vicinity of the northwest intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 The najority of th- property within the Specific Plan area is owned by the William Lyon Company of Orange County Following question and answer session the meeting of the Planning Commission was adjourned upon motion by Commissioner Tolsv y and seconded by Commissioner Jones at 9 02 p.m. The meeting of the City Council was adjourned following a motion ty Councilman Schlosser and seconded by Councilman Mikels at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully Submitted ,a.. Lauren 11. Wasserman City Clerk 8867 CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMOpGA .. W REGISTER NO. 79__9_19 ( WARR 9 YEN / V E N O 0 R N A M E DATE NET ,N c ,1 ,In L 00240 00241 00242 00244 00245 OU246 00247 00248 00249 02386 02410 02412 02414 - 02415 0416 031417 024LB 02419 20 02421 02422 ` 02423 02424 02425 02426 02427 02428 02429 02430 02431 02432 02433 02434 02435 07.436 02437 07438 02439 02440 6725 7179 1311 3301 '00 5275 8313 6125 0127 8353 8125 VOID VVia 0 1315 1500 680 1790 '1903 2098 2100 2441 2450 VOID 2575 2595 2650 2678 2685 2700 3300 ?325 4930 4580 4600 4700 4775 483 4900 4995 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES NA IEL MASONARY EMPcY PETTY CASH, HARRY BANKOOFEAMERICAOtPT INTL CITY MGT ASSOC SAN BRNDNO CO EMPLOY C LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES RICHAROSs GARY SIERRA SAVINGS C LOAN RICHARRD MILLS ASSOC FORM$ ALLY NMENT FOO5RM1SSI ALIGNMENT BE K7ANE RICHARDF BLUE CASS 3110 LEVARD DEVELOPMENT 3URKERT. DEANNA • C H J HAILS LAB INC CARRERO BUS TAX ASSOC FARR PAPER COMPANY CO OF SAN BERNARUINO CO SAN BERNARD NU SHERI VENCOR t70. 25715 CUCAMOtIGA CO HATER GIST CUCAMONGA P4INTIVG DAILY REPORT DATASTRIP CORP DAY-LEE PLUMBING DETCO NGRAVING /TROPHY EMPEY/ HARRY J ENGR NEWS- RECORD F H CHEM CO INC GEMCO GENERAL TELEPHONE CO CORDONS INC GRANT, JERRY R HE14DRYCKS DAN POLLEY, WILLIAM L HUBBS, LLOYD 8/30/79 8/30/79 8/31/79 8%311179 8/31/79 8/31/79 9/04/79 9/06/79 9/07/79 9/06/79 9/19/79 9%19 79' 9/t9/ 79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 919%79 9/19/79 9/19If 4/29/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9119/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9119/79 60.00 3,01G.00 27777.18 43179;.59 126.55 896.00 550.00 106.04 20,000.00 106.04 - '-"•- 250.00 '2,356.00 503.52 25.00 8-:00 -' 23.00 30.32 ._ 32.00 139,181.00 1,062.81 71.66 398.28 243.39 107.98 219.42 75.00 37.00 11.00 30 .97 27.32 331.90 75.00 57.38 125.00 125.00 �� '11R 'k L L C2441 02442 02443 07444 82445 2446 02447 02448 02449 02450 02451 02452 02453 07454 02455 02456 02457 02458 02460 07462 07463 02464 02465 02466 02469 02469 5110 6576 6607 6625 6630 68 ?0 7177 7220 7303 7360 7375 7817 7825 79G5 8045 8075 8127 6200 8332 8390 0395 8525 8760 9105 9480 4550 1811 KELLY PAPER K -MART 4056 LA FARE SONNY LAM, JAK LOS ANG LES TTMES M W M INC SHIMMING POOL MATCHAM, KAREN C MILES, FREDDIE 8 MOHLE PERRY C ASSOC MONAHAN CLAUDIA PR :HER, MONTE PROGRESS BULLETIN PUBLIC ENP RETIREMENT S RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE RAPID DATA INC RICHARDS, GARY ROBINSON. JAMES HL SEARSLROEBUCKS LPC {OY CO SOUTNERNi +CALIFCE!C I SON SOUTHERN CALF GAS CO STATIONERS COMP TORO PACIFIC DISTRIBUTI VAIRIN. MICHAEL D HHEI Ejy, MARY WOLFE C SONS SALES CO I 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/!9/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/19/79 9/L9/79 9/19179 9/19/79 9/19/79 9%19%79 9/19/79 9/l9/79 9119/79 9/19/79 9%19/79 9/19/79 944.12 105.24 137.74 21.00 125.00 4.80 84.50 35.86 435.00 2,992.80 ' 45.00 6.03 66.99 4.68T.93 46.00 392.00 163.24 75.00'^ 512.56 2239.62 12.93 Ir 275.25 4,830.40 558.08 1,525.00 805.60 L ilia 02471 VOID XFINALCORP TTOTALS , 9/1979 365.00 147,195.97 - ' CLAIM FOR DAMAGES �o� cucalaoaen RESERVE FOR FILING STAfdP ;t;,n;l.o CISY CN TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CLAIM No.__ .0 t111T11.A eu9aaa no me Lr � •' INSTRUCTIONS '�SqP,�M Alll. �tsy1at i 2 241 0P: y to person or W na Dtopert7 most he Ned not rt.A1�uYAl alt loo stye aver the occurrence. Gov. Cod0 Sec 9113) later than ZZ Claims far dama jes to real property most be filed not 1 year after the «cohnes. (Cay. Code Scr. 91? y. Read entice clot,.% before filing. e' Sea pate I for diagram upon which to brats place of accident. h This claim form must be signed on page g at bottom. 0 Attach separate aheets. If neeeassry to give full details. SIGN EACH SHEET 7. Claim be City Clork. (Gov. Code Sec 915a) must filed with TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOKA Nmna Claimant n Aga of Claimant (U natural person) �o%f Herpa lltdAsess of Claimant City and State r, .J CA�•rr .--a } }dine Telephone Number I -'7 t'i - SrQ -S � Business Address of Claimant City and Stab Buatrm Telephone Number Give address to rhich you desire notlm or tommuvlraUOns to be sent regarding this claim: '/AkeeW . VA)/ NutIS tfAuF, Now dos DADIAGC or INJURY cerurr Give full Iaartaeular1 ,l ✓ u 4IJ bL ,:-aT tY- A \ -,Al Eii% 1 16/0/h�k c1R Sfoj9 14'N rl<�;,)AP, U,AI�al<ca %IV+Gt pt/iY5 0,e to k-.CCl/,4e.✓e.Anoac4 afx.\ 1I,•. ,.�.�„ _ 9v-d; "L'A16 fa SC-t- <4i/ Cc,A`%IA�j �.vtll tw �afc -� When did pA,IfACE or INJURY «curt Give full particulars, date. tine of day: 7 3'• t ,1 (� jo I�,rg• Where did DMIAGE or I`IJURY orurs Describe fully. and 1 «ate on dlagrem on reverse tide of this short, %.l•are appropriate. give street names and address and measurements tram landmark$: 6-'{" InW Re: I /eta A.1 What particular ACT or 01,11SSION do you claim eat.sed the Injury or omega? Give names of City employ "using be Injury or ag dame. If krrown N:'c \ItdeaNtli �'cP! }'�u ld��•tJ d.Wl MaJW�d r / /cLi 5/(/C'c/S u�' -ki lJcc✓ v••t ,1!�jV dPJ� VnN-.)S/bn/ ✓JGAs' What DAMAGE or INJURIES do yens claim resulted! Give full extent of Injuries or damages claimed: V"' — WCC:IM What AMOUNT io you claim on account of each item of Injury or damage as of date of presentation of this Clzl a giving hash of computation UN•(NG•vP/ 11 (u•• �P %t (a ✓.v iii L'a'c(r? ✓e A[AC1JICd1 ;%C, �)dJ'l llvn ESTISIATED . \L10L'NT as far os knaw� you claim on aceourt of each Item of prospective injury or damage, Ching bails of 30 y0�0 •vo r•. seE rACE 2 (o\T n) THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE -SID! Ina%& aM* Paymanb cacelved, If MY. and oomn of Insurance Company: Erpendnures mode on account of accident or Injury: (Dale — (tom) (Amount) ♦',_ "• •�. L`oritl' )v�C��.•.lat.T-j;(- x&bar L `I -1�1' LAITat ✓V t 4PN I41�CA,,a Cr:.411 M L.I,.TJ •:* Name and sddrees of Witnesre; Doctors ant cloepltaL: \� ,i !• rI , 1. lr N v t1,1.� \Kr✓ t 't READ CAREFULLY For all accident claims Place on following diagram name, of streets, Including North. East. South, and West; Indicate place of accident by 'X' and by showing house nu rbem of distances to Street comer yost If City Vehicle was Involved, desi nate by letter ^A' location of City vehicle when i first saw IL and by "B" location of Yourself or your vehicle when you first saw C�ty vehicle: location of City vehicle U time of see dent by'A.I' and location of yourself or your nblcle At the time of the agddent by -1 NOTE. and Na point of impact by '7L' NOTE. If diagrams below M not fit the situation, attach hereto a Proper diagram sirned by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS SIDEWALK __J LL cuR CUR PARKWAY P/7/ SIDEWALK FOP. AUTOMOBILE AC /CIDENTC I I I 7/\\ r lmg on his behalf gt nng relationship Fame 1(PN //C i h Data retonship lo' m Cleent _ yJh r �^ _ 15s i 3 ✓r)LP,ito 5�h�d NOW: Presentation of a false Claim is a felOnY (CAI Pei Code Sao. 72). �). YJ CLA7N5 MUST BE FILED WITH C1TT1*tERK (CDV CODE SeiC 9ISa). i �J Flo l i CITY: RANCHO CUCAMONGA : •. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES VOTING DELEGATE FORM , 1. VOTING DELEGATE: JAMES f. FROST — TNANEI- MAYOR TITLE 2. VOTING ALTERNATE; PHILLIP SCHLOSSER NAME MAYOR PRO -TEM TITLE ATTEST: T NAN Deputy City Clerk TITLE PLEASE RETURN T0: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1400 K STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 NOT LATER THAN SEPTcMBER 8. 1979 V. �i:.;�: ., :rti'O� {�' ^,':. �" 1' �9�F�: :•- •;,:�:tiY•� ^'niyPipF?.;..`•: �d�rl,�',4�""hr ,OO.... i!.:ix1'�'!41 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA 1471DRANDUH DATE, September 19, 1979 TO, City Council and City Reneger FIt0.M, Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SJBJECf, Approval of contract for remaining savant mandatory General Plan Elements, two optional elements and lull Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan project with Sedway /Cooke On August 17, 1979, representatives of the City Council Planning Commission and staff interviewed the mast qualified candidates who submitted proposals for work on the remaining seven state mandated elements of our General Plan. From these candidates, the firm of Sedway /Cooke was selected Sedway /Cooke will provide the City with the following, 1) Land Use and Oevelop.,ent Element - includes Land Usa, Circulation, Public Facilities, Housing and Urban Design. 2) Environmental Resources Element - includes Open Space, Conservation, Scenic Highways, and Park and Recreation Facilities. 1) Public Health and Safety Element - includes Seismic Safety, Noise and Safety. Throughout all the above elements, the theme of Energy Conservation will be stressed. Also included within the agreement is the provision for the preparation of the draft and final Environmental Impact Report to certification. The attached copy of the draft agreement botwaon the City and the firm of Sedvay/ Cooke is for your review. The total amount for work on the General Plan is $100,000. The amount for work on the EIR is $12,000 bringing the total contract price to $112,000. Figure 1, page 18, stows the proposed work schedule. Total anticipated time is 10 months from starting date We have met with the Cer.sultant and the staff and the Consultant are in agroamant RECOMMENDATION, It is recemmonded that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the mntracL and direct staff to send a copy to Sedway /Cooke for their sig- nature.I / r Rospec ive aubml`�'t'tte�'d Jack Lam, Director o!�_ ® Community Development JL,BKHt DJH,cc Attachment, Draft Agreement for Services with Sedway /Cooke 5 DRAFT . GENERAL PLAN PROJECT ACREEMNT This Agreement e- ,rofesslonal services, dated and effective .s a contract between tht City of Rancho Cucamonga, a muni- cipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "City and Sedway /Cooke, a California Cotporation, hereinaftar refer[ d to as "Consultant" I RECITALS A Whereas, it has been dete.v.ned that it 1s in the best interest of the City to retain the professional services of a comultant to assist in preparing the seven remaining mandatory general plan elements, Noise, Seismic Safety, Safety, Open Space, Conservation, Scenic Highways and Housing Elements, and two optional elements, the Parka and Recreation Element and an Urban Design Element with reference to Energy Conservation throughout all nine proposed ele- ments, plus preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Reports for all work products covered by this agreement; Bald work products hereinafter referred to as "Plan "; and B Whereas, the City has approved the selection of Consultant to assume responsibility for performance of the work described in Appendix 1: Scope of fork, attached hereto and incorporated hetein by reference, the sax as if fully set forth, and herein- after referred to as "Scope of Work" in accord with the terms and conditions set forth herein II THEREFORE, CITY AND CONSULTANT ACREF AS FOLLOWS: ACREMENT Consultant shall prepr,re, perform, and complete the following profes- sional services which shall result in completlon of Plan A Em laymen( of Consultnn(. The City hereby agrees to enga¢e the Con- sultant ,nJ the n.•uvu l;nnt agree- to perform the tasty r,•t forth herein for th.•t tty The program is intended to meet the requirerente of Cal.fnrni.0 law B Responsibility of the Cons dtant. The Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technt••al accuracy, timely completion, and the coordination of all reports and other scrrtces furnished by the Consultant under this agreemen , except that the Consultant shall not be responsible for the accuracy of informitlon supplied by the City The am,altont shall, without addi. tonal compensation, correct or revise any factual errors in hi: ,er.;rta and other data; provided that the Consultant Iii shall be compensated for any corrections or revisions required by • inaccuracies In Information supplied by the City or Its agents 1, the amount and by the method established by this Agreement. The Consultant shall perform such profes a local services as may ba necessary to accomplish the work required to be performed under this agreement, in accordance with this agreement C. Acsmns16111ty of Cites The City shall be responsible for all liaison, H; and communication with all city agencies, staff, officials, and current or previous consultants to the City, as well as with other involved agencies of other levels and jurisdictions, including but not limited to San Bernardino County, the Southern California Association of Governments and the State of California D Scope of Work The program to be performed by tine Consultant is more parr auZ r y described in Appendix A: Scope of Work, attached I.e•eto and Incorporated herein by reference, the same as if fully set forth, and hereinafter referred to as "Scope of Work ". E Changes 1 The City nay, at any time, by written order, make changes within the general scope of this agreement in the services or work to be performed If such changes cause an increase or decrease In the Consultant's mat of, or time required for, performance of • any services under this agreement, an equitable adjustment shall be made and this agreement shall be modified in writing accordingly Any claim of the Consultant for adjustment under this clause must be asserted In writing within 30 days from the date of receipt by the Consultant of the notification of change All correspondence concerning contract changes will be through certified mail 1 No services for which any additional compensation will be charged by the Consultant shall be furnished without the written authoriza- tion of the City F Termination 1 The Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party to the event of substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the terminating party; rp ovlded, that no such termlm- tion may be effected unless the other pa -ty is given: a Not less than ten (10) days written notice (delivered by certi- fied nail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate. and b. An opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination -2- 7 2 If termination is effected by the t.1ty, an equitable adjustment In the prier provided for in this Agreement shall be made The City retains the right to terminate without cause If the consul- tant Is terminated by the City without cause, the consultant will be compensated only for the actual work performed to the date of termina- • tion. If the contract 1s timinated by the City for cause, any damages sustained by the City by reasons of consultant's breach will be recoverable Should the consultant elect to terminate justifiably, It will be only compensated for services performed to the date of Lamination. All correspondence will be addressed to the following luu•iune Consultant: Sedway /Cooke 325 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, California 94111 Attention: Rod Jeung City: City of Rancho Cucamonga P O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: Dan Rendrycks 3 Upon receipt of a termination action pursuant co paragraph (1) above, the Consultant shall: a Promptly discontinue all cervices affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and b Deliver to the City all data, drawings, reports, surmnries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the Consultant in performing this agreement, whether completed or in progress. 4. Upon terination pursuant to paragraph (11 above, the City may taxe over the work and prosecute the sane to eorpletlon by agree- ment with another party or otherwise G Payment. 1 Pay-ent shall be made according to the following schedule: S9 700 ravable at the end of each month to a maximum of ten runths, and $15,000 upon receipt of all work under this Agree - mat including work copies and rough drafts of caps and texts 2 Payment shall be made to the Consultant as soon as practicable and in any .asr within 30 days of lnvnl( In R. 3 all pavronts will be authorized after the 9onthl- work Progress Rvdevt Hm.agement Report (HU?Mf) has been accepted by the City Se'tion G -3) it Data and Servlcca. 1 Except for inforcatior to be provided by the City, the Consultant shall provide all nrcessary professional And non - professional ser- vices, office space, equlpmcr-, supplies and other items of expense of whatever kind and nature required for the performance and com- pletion of the program. �N 2 All information, data, reports, records, and laps as are existing, • avallable, owed by or in the poisesslen of the City, and necessary for the carrying out of the wo rk shall be furnished to the Consultant without charge by the City and the City shall cooperate with the Con- sultant In every way possible in carrying out the work. 3 All material prepared by the Consultant in the course of the program shall be deemed to be the property of the City and &Full be delivered upon final payment 7 -3a- f The Consultant agrees to attend meetings with the City Council, Planning Commission or advisory cmmittecs as soy be reasonably necessary for the coapictlon of their services hereunder, provided that the total of such meetings shall not exceed fifteen (15) . Compensation for such above mentioned meetings in excess of fifteen (15) In number or such meetings held beyond tan son,ha from comaence- ment shall be billable at the Consultant's standard billing rates and may exceed the maximum sum specified in Seltfon R Consultant shall attend such other meetings as ate uppropclate and neceaaaty to the effective completion of the contract, as mutually determined by Consultant and City 5 Gathering Information from othe t employed consultants will be part of this contract Where practical the City way authorize the distribution of materials and Information between Consultants and facilitate the free flow of information where feasible 1 Personnel. 1 The Consultant represents that he has, or will secure at his own expense, all personnel required in performing the services under his agreement Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City 2. All services required herein in this agreement will be performed by the Consultant or under Its supervision J Time of Performance. The program as described In Appendix A attached hereto, shall be completed within the time specified in Appendix A • unless modified pursuant to Section R. R Cmpensatlon. The City •r -es to pay the Consultant for all services and materials rendered in the performance of the specified work scope a sum of not to exceed $112,0. provided that if either the E'R has not been certified or the General Plan has net been adopted by City Council by the end of the tenth ®nth from the date of the execution of the contract, sold contract shall be renegotiated with respect to $15,000 final payment specified in Section G 1 and as mutually dater - mined by City and Consultant L Reports. The Consultant .iall submit such memoranda, reports and maps as Pre required by the scope of work sat forth in Appendix A in the form of one camera -ready original plus one copy provided, however, that all final adopted work documents, as specified in Tasks 7 and 9 of Appendix shall be provided N C mponnntion for Atkiltlonal Sery lees. If any legal action is brought against the City. In connection with the General Plan, which is the sub- ject of this agreement, the City will e,ssume the responsibility for con - trncting with the Consultant for testimunv, if necessary, In defense of the General Plan, in accordance with standard billing rate, Should the Clty be subject tr a Judgement of an appellate court that the adopted Gene-al Plnn is Inadequate end the City and the Consultant Jointly deter- mine that said Inadrqunry is thou to error, nr omissions as a result of the Consultants work, the Consultant shall pav all legal fees and costs • Incurred bt City -L- / D N. Liability. Consultart agrees to hold City harmless from any and all third party claims, including but not limited to wrongful death, bodily injury, property damage and any other claim of whatever nature arising out of the acts or omissions of Consultant, Its employees o- subcontrac- ters, in the performance of this Agreement. 0, ABalgnabflity. The Consultant shall not assign any of Csnsultants rights or obligations under this Agreement without prior written con- sent of the City thereto; provided, however, that claims for money dva or to become due to the Consultant from the City under this adreemen, may be assigned to a bank, trust c,mpany, or other financial Institu- tion without such approval Written notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the City. P. Findings Confidential. Any reports, Information, date, etc., given to or prepared or assmbled by the Consultant under this agreement - whieh the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individ• dual or organization by the Consultant without prior written approval of the City. Q Prol act lbnttor ins. The total approach utilized by Consultant shall - brtng togethe- its The resources of expei,ence and knowledge; it shall promote efficiency to project performance and coordination and offer effective management. I Purpose of Detailed Work Program - The purpose of the Detailed ,\ Work Program described in Scope of Work, Appendix A attached, 1 shall be: • a To provide for a uniquely close wrking relationship between Consultant and City; enabling effective monitoring of the total work effort. b To provide an iterative process for carrying out the technical work from the general initial phases to the mono detailed final phases c To provide a reiterative review proves, through which the tasks, findings and recommendations, and work products of Consultant can be closely reviewed by City and tangible decisions can be reached at the conclusion of each work effort d To facilitate decisions relating to I•ey Issues early In the work effort Important decisions can be code by City on critl- cai [Blues which require immediate attention, without having to wait until the conclusion of the entire project C To provide the private atctor with essential technical base data. Icrluding environmental !nfocmatfon, early in the work effort as It hecomes available. -5- I f. To design a Work Program which is flexible so that it my • be terminatad at the conclusion of any phase and still pro- vide valuable data 2 Scheduling Standards - Consultant will prepare and adopt standards of cost and tine requirements for each work task and its component subtasks in the preparation and completion of the Plan The Detailed Work Program including the Master Work Progress and Budget Management Schedule shnll be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to any further work or research being conducted on Plan 3 Morthly WorL Progress and Budget Management (Mr. ?FU) Report - Each month Consultant shall use the Master Work Progress and Budget Management Schedule to generate a monthly report which shall consist of the following: a Monthly updatoi project manager's sheet b hunthly updated project progress schedule c Monthly updated project budget mansrmant chart 4 Dwel®Cntatlon System - A documentation Sy.•em will be set up by Consultant The following four elements ahnil form the basis of the system: a Correspondence: A number system shall be set up to cover any correspondence between my two entities on the project, sequen- tially nunbered in chronological order For ins conce, the first correspondence from Consultant to City on this project would be SC -RC -1 Correspondence from the City to the Consultant would be RC -SC -1, with RC meaning Rancho Cucamonga and SC meaning Sedway /Cooke This system shall cover all letters, telexes and memorandums If telephone conversations were considered significant enough to be retained in files, they would be confirmed by telexes and thus enter the system. All correspondence shall reference the topic discussed at least to the detail of the element in question with regard to the Detailed Work Program. b Conference /Meeting Notes: Such notes shall be nuroered and follow a standard format that will enable their relevance to detailed activities of the Work Program to he [middy ascertained. -6- 12- A e Data Collection and Analysts: The data collected and armlysln • associated with each activity of the Detailed :ork Program shall be rumbered with that activity number, and otherwise kept in good order by the particular inlivtdual or subcontractor assigned for each activity. The conclusions, analysis and data for each activity will form a separate package in the final set of documentation as discussed h crelnbelow d. 11anagement Reporting: All itme prepared by Consultant in support of its management role will form a separate set of documents. The following elements arc envisioned at this time: 1 Detailed cost budget and work program 2 Master 4ork Progress and Budget Management Reports (Monthly updated project manager's sheets, monthly updated progress schedules, monthly updated project _ budget management charts) The Documentation System will be finalized by Consult- t at the completion of Plan and after adoption by City such that it will satisfy the needs of the City without undue procedural hardship on any one party e Technical Da_a Synthesis: After collection and ewgluation of all available technical data, consultant shall submit said lnforration to City, describing the source of data collected and Identifying why certain specific data was selected for use over other date pertaining to the same subject matter Con- sultant shall also Identify and list major data gaps and Indicate for each identified gap its implltatio� upon overall scheduling requ rements R Equal Employment Opportunity The Consultant is an Egt.l Opportunity and Affirmative Action emplover and agrees to cocply dith applicable requlroment% governtng equal mpliyment opportunity S Lnsl�ctlon. The City, in reference to any request for payment sub- allied by Consultant for services under this Ar.,eement, shall have the right to rogacmt and vxamine additional recordq from tite Consul - tint to qnb +tanrl Ate auah payment T Authority Each of the parties to this As,ecment represents that the Person signing on behalf of such party has rile authority to do so U Relatlonshlo o! Parties. It is understood that the contractual rela- tionship o! thv Consultant to the City Is that n( an Independent con- tractor, and all Persona working for or under the direction of the Consultants are their agents, servants, and mployccs, and not agents, servants, or employer, of the City -7- 13 IV MIMS WHERDDF, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date set forth herein. DATE CITY OF RANCHO CICA401CA Mayor Approved as to fom and content ATTEST: City Attorney City Clerk Partner, Paul Sedvay Seduay /Cooke -8- 1 + • I 1 L • APPEM I% A• GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK Sedway /Cooke proposes a olne -task work program terminating with the adoption of a General Plan meeting all requlrmaento of State law. Each of these tasks will be accomplished sequentially according to a schedule which is presented in Figure 1 at page 18 Unless otherwise stated In the Work Program, all references to meetings of the Citizens Advisory Committee will be optional, contingent upon the establishment of Elie C A.0 by the City Reference to attendance at Citv Council and Planning Commission meetings by the Consultant will count individually All ,Joint City Council /Planning Commission meetings will count as one meeting All meetings sioll be upon agreement of City Most major presentations will be before a joint City Ccun�il /Planning Commission meeting. Functional Organization of General Plan - The listing of mandatory General Ilan _ elements in the State Planning and Zoning Lau is usually, but mistakenly, inter- preted as requiring the preparation of nine separate ad distinct documents T4s tunnel vision approach In turn usually leads to the preparation of General Plat which are disjointed, uneven In depth of analysis, and characterized by conflicted policies Taking full advantage of the opporumltieo for innovation and creativity which are provided in the Planning Law and Its implement Ing guidelines, the con- sultant •eon proposes to follow a functional approach in formulating and organizing the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. All of the subject areas covered by the nine mandatoq elements plus the two optional elements (public facilities and urban design) will be grouped into three "super" elements according to their functional relationships and purpose These three super elements are: Land Use and Develop- ment, Environmental Resources, and Public Health and Safety. The Land Use and Development Element will include the subject areas of land use, circulation, public facilities, (rousing, and urban design Its purpose will establish pellcy for the utilization of the City's land resources as they relate to the provision of infrastructure, housing opportunities, and the design of the built environment While 019 element will not assume Rreater Importance than the other two, it will dote mine basic pallet as and relationships which will form the basis fot these other two elements The Land Use and Development Element will incorporate the Interim land use, circulation and public facilities elements, as revised to reflect consistency with Lite Environmental Renources and Public Health and Safety Eleent+ The Environmental Resources Element will encompass the subject arena of open space, conservation, scenic highways, and park and recreation facilities It will set forth baste poliries fnr the management and n,nservatton of the natural and visual resources present within the City This element will also satisfy all requirements of Coyvrnment Code Section 65477 (Quimby Act) for subdivision dedications ® The Public Health ant Safety Enirment will Include the subject arens of seismic attract, noise, and safety It will vstablish policies for those aspects of the man -mile and natural envitenm : ^e which relate to human comfort and safety, including but not limited to ecologic hazards, fire, floeding, noise pollution. -q- ►5 and crime Analysis of each of them.• factors will explicitly address the rela- tionship between its probability of impacting human safe y or comfort and ,lie public costa of achieving an acceptable Level of probability that these i.gacts will not occur. Energy Conservation - The 9wajeet area of energy conservation 1s convenkiomnlly addressed only within tine general context of the conservation element However, its increasingly pervasive impact on all aspects of our dally lives 9;.ggests that energy conservation be explicitly considered within each of the three ouper elements and their component subject areas Since Rancho Cucamonga 1s at the threshold of its General Plan process, it has an outstanding opportunity to break new grourd by explicitly bringing energy conservation cowiderotionm Into all aspects of this process. The Community Development Department tppreciates that fully capitalizing on this opportunity will Lesult in dc� eloping a General Plan with national impact and signif Jounce, and which will serve as the model for similar efforts throughou t the United Sta es It will also be noted that pur- suing this approach would in turn open u� g-ant opportunities from the California Energy Ccmrdselon and the Department of ..orgy Task 1: Initial Reconnaissance and Work Procrat, Refinement Intent• a To preliminarily identify significant Issues, orablems and opportunities that should be addressed in the new General Plan elements; b To identify, locate and collect ,11 data and octet references that should be considered In the preparation of tine new elements; and c To refine the work program and s,.t.edule in uecordanc^ with the rela- tive emphasis to be given to various fames and in sc:ordance with data availability Description: The consultant will Interview all staff, officials and b- sines® and communtty interests with significant Insights into the problem- and oppor- tunities confrontlnR the conso- vation and development of the community All policies of other jurisdictions that have bearing on the cir,'s dove lopment will be identified The consultant will collect relevant data from Interviewees as well as from other agenclts which have information relevant to the General Plan Ihls includes t.nsultation with consultunts to the Ctt, who nre wrking on other development projects such as, but not limited to, the Industrial area study, itscal imptct model and traffic study Produtts:I a Revised work program and scbedclo; and b Memo for public distribution on the objectives, scope and schedule of the General Plan program. IUnless otherwise hxlltat,d, all work prodects will be supplied In tine form of O one (1) camera -ready original plus one (1) copy -10- !6 • Clti.en Participation: The consultant's nrincinal- Ln -clu rEe and Drolect cinager_ will attend one meting or the Citizens Advisory Cummlttve or Planning Commis- ston to present the objectives, scopa and schedule of the General Plan and to discuss issues that should be addressed in the General Plan program (2 person -days preparation and 2 persur -day trips) Task 2• Ana lysie of Adopted Interim General Plan Intent: a To give the consulting tram an In -depth understanding of the back- ground of the interim General Plan: b To avoid duplication of offortt and r To establibh the basis for the accomplishment of subsequent tasks. 0scr� full. The consultant will analyze the land use, circulation. and public f.v O .tics elemems of tht Interim General Plan to ascertaln their overall devei •Mont concept and implications for the new General Plan elements. Analyef8 of documents wll be supplemented by consultation with staff Products: An Lnforw.al memo, possibly In outline form, will be prepared presenting the .onsultmnt'b understanding of the Interim ucneral Plan This =me will be prepared for distribution to staff for their review and comaent t,t,ren P.rt lc l Datlon: Alter conferring with staff, the consultant will inter 1.11.1 rlt lzens who Dlayea key rol -s 1. femulating the Interim General Plan Vt,,v ntervl.•ws will give further depth in understanding of the conceit of the Int .-rim P.an, and they will be reflected in the memorandum described under products Task J: Date Annlys /s I Issue Identification intent a To organize awl reforvat data in a form useable In subsequent tasks; and r To nd:ntlfy issues that suit be addressed by the new General Plan elements. n_crinr ion Tl,e .onsultart will analyze the data collected In Task 1, and tine r.snits of this analysis will be presented !n written, tabolar, anvl "piled form t r.prtxlnrtble '1000" scale haso nip will be prepared for this purpose The lu•ulowl.ng minimum number of Ivell' scale raps are plannul: a Cnvlrorowntal Rvsourt VaIaCV; tie map Will sbuw open space areas, park and recreation facilltl.s, visually prominent natural forms, slgnificnat vegetation and watefcourses, as they Presently exist b Development Constraints; vhich will be a corposite of other ways, will show flood -prom arms, areas of Mope instability, lands subject to ground .`allure, fire hazard arras, wise impact areas, etc -11- 17 Existing Housing Condit -Ions; this map will ioeument the supply and Quality of housing available within the City Other "1000" scale maps cay be needed as detcrrined and mutually agreed upon by City and Consultant during the course of the pork program Data analveis would in turn raise issues relevant to subject areas covered by the new General Plan elements This task would sharpen these Issues and preliminarily assess their implication for the Interim General Plan elements. Products: A technical report dornmenting the existing conditions analyzed above Th!s appendix will be suitable for either appending to the Ceaeral Pl+h.h document or incorporation In the Plan EIR as an existing eoMttions chapter; and b A memorandum in the form of an isoue paper summarizing the findings of their task This issue paper will be suitable for public dist- ibution Cttlz.n Participation: The consultanCo princlool -in- charge and project rnnager •ill attend one meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee or Planning Co®lssfon to present the findings of this task City staff will prepare a memorandum ahm- marizing "nd conf tenting the recamaendations of the citizens panel Recommendations will be incorporated Into the options and alternatives prepared in Task 4 ether Trips: 3 person -day trips. Task 4: Development of Options and Alternatives In[ant: a To develop options and alternatives for resolving the tsaues ralsed during Task 3; To evaluate and select one option or alternative which addresses each Issue; and To outline the scope, format and content of the Environmental Reanurces and Public health and Safety Elements and the housing component of the Land Use and Oeveloprent Element Description: The consultant will develop and formulate options and alternatives responsive to the Issues identified In Task 3. An defined here, an option to a means of resolving one planning Issue Options which address a broad range of related issues In an Integrated and systematic Banner are defined as alternatives. 0 This task would but be an open -ended exercise, but will be con- rained by the development concept established by the Interim General Plan, a.. dentificd in Task 2 Pateh.cial conflicts between the Interim plan and the new General Plan elaments ell 1 be ldent if led and eserved for analysis during Task 5. Formulation of options and alternatives will also occur within the parameters of what is per- e eetved as being reasonable and /or feasible by Ccmavnity Development Department -!I Pg identified In ins ptions their envirm,oentalslmpacts and Policys a evaluated stff L�plleation Products: including a A report suitable for use ss an EIR chapter on e1bili111ty. imps, description of the process. alternatives, fea[ Smpacte and policy implication; and .. acts and Policy implications the b llomornndtrs suitable for public Jistr iDution swrislnF the alternatives and discussing [heir feasibility, itgr memo will include a discussion of the implicit goals and objectives of each alternative as well as me outline a thetHousins` ComponentRpsourc es, Public Health amt Safery Elements, project ramgor ansultant's prim GitIzon Gill ottcnJtoti 6 ofethe Citizens AdvlsoryaCa=itteegoraPlanning Commission to discuss the findings of this task The intent Gill tale n confirming Plan EIcom- approspriate alters and to confirm the a memorandum utn¢arizinghe d c General Plan Elc- mends [ions of the alt izens panel Recommendations 6111 be reflected in the next task Other Trips: 2 person -day trips for last minute reconwlssancr and coneul[at on with city staff STask 5: Internal Ca s1 tc cY AtulYnls Intent: both with lements a:- a eocensurerthad the rote General Plan Ec irculatlon., and s Public facilities elements: and b To prepare an into,", consistency administrative procedure for use by staff Description: Vock:ng with tto alternatives selected in Task w. the plan d t ce- will evaluate their consiste sv with Zeach6 other be addressed. Inclusion of l the cu.nts Conflicts tdertifie. during proposed elements will including recoanctdatlons or. EnerFV Conservation plan !.d consistency througi.Out a be addressed A' er native modes of transPOrtot ion. a bicycle tra',s Progran' will he include appropriate �revis !oast oftttl caeecloventalonn1e staff Uuons s•�.,ctcs will be reap lved Ay aDP P as adopted in [onset _ant 111 also develop an administrative Droredurc to be used Dv City In in rvaluultg and enaurinF con is tencY D¢R•con the General Plan. in ev and any plan nsuri menta or ntv elements which may be suLaequcnt lv Proposed Ill, consistency tundevunatdescried me to scat( be used to teat and refine the and ptvcvdurc. 11 Products• • a A memorandum report of the internal consistency analysis which details revisions of the Plan elements necessary to achieve consistency. and b A report establishing an internal consistency administrative procedure. Citizen Paripation: The consultant'. principal -in- charge and project manager will attend ontice mea ricg of the Citizens uivisory Committee or Planning Commis - slon to discuss the findings of this task Task 6: Preparation of Draft General Plan Intent: To prepare a draft General Plan for staff review and comment Desertntlan The Consultant will prepare a complete Draft General Plan for revic, This document will include the new General Plan Elc=nts Including housing, conservation, open space, seismic safety, noise, scenic highways. and safety elements, as they are defined in Section 65302 of the California Goverment Code; a recreation element at defined In Section 65303 of said Code; _ an urban design element, which may be combined and reorganized as determined by the Consultant; and the Interim General Plan Elements, as the latter are moJifled during Task S, and organized as determined In Task 4 The consultant will articulate the policies of the plan in tax ual, mapped and diagrammatic tom In sufficient detail for effective impleme,tation The plan text will • be extensively illustrated for maximum public comprehension. Graphics, including =Pa. nay be in sxatch and /or unreduced form Two s+parate subtn .s will address the issues of the compliance of the plan with applicable state laws, and the relationship between the plan and its 1tolementation prcgrm The finings of the compliance subtask would be docu- mented In the form of a technicnl report which could be appended to the General Plan The plan Implementaton program relationship subtask woult: Identify key points where th s relationship is critical, and could formulate an admin,stra- tive procedure for evaluating and maintaining conststency between the plan and the Implementation program Products: a A draft General Plan; b Technical report on compliance of plan with applicable state lava; and C Admini,trative procedure for General Plan Implmer.tation system con- sistency Other Trips: One person -dcy trip to discuss draft with city staff Task 7: Preparation of Draft and Final Environmental Impact Renorts on • General Plan Resc�tior: The Consultant will prepare a craft Environmental Impacc Report on the General Plan Consultant will attend a minimum of 3 public hearings on -14- 20 the draft EIR and will consider all comments, after Walch CanS.Itant Will pr,par• final EIR and work shall continue through certiricatlon Tile F. I.R. shall comPlY with all pertinent state guidelines and laws, including but not limited to Sections 21000 et oeq of the Public Resources Code as amended Products: a Draft Environmental Impact Report (75 topic$, including one copy of draft technical appendix); and b Final Environmental Impact Report (50 c: pies including any technical appendix) c flaps and texts reproducible through xerox or Diaro machino d The City will prepare the initial study The consultant will be responsible for addressing all identified impacts to acceptable s oandards as outlined 1n the State Administrative Code Sections 15000 et seq as amended. Such lime may include, but net be limited to: 1 and objectives as formulateedd in prepara tion f tionof the lGeneral cPlan. 2 Elaboration upon the following issues, but not limited to them: • a Notw of Preparation to be prepared by City with tho City i widing a list of agcnties that it deems to be res- ponsible agencies. b Preparation of Draft E.I.R. Which address the following issues derived from the implementation of the General Plan: 1 School Impacts and mttigatlon measures 2. public sery Ice and facilities impacts a Sewer b Fire Protection c Electric Utilities d Solid Waste Disposal a Library f Water g Natural Cos Distribution It Tclerhone and Other Com¢unicatinns 1 Recreational Faetlitles j Emergency Services 1 Hydrology and Flood Control 4 Tra'olc and Circulation irpacts a Incorp,rate results from Citv hide Traffic Model, Indus- trial area and specific plan seas b Address impacts from traffic or; suggest mitigation measures G Air Quality Impacts a Vehicle trips . b Vehicle miles c Peak traffic volumes at =Joe intersections d Vehicular mix e Travel speeds Noise impacts related to both mobile and stnttonary sources Cumulative Impacts of aforementioned impacts 7 Prepare a Screen Check of Draft E.I.R for City review prior to printing Notices of Completion - Upon completion of the Draft EIR, the Con- sultant shall file the notice of completion with the Secretary of the Resources Agency and shall publish such notice In the Dally Report Newspaper In addition, the Consultant shall transact said notice and the required number of Draft EIR's to the State Clearioghotoc The Consultant shall also transmit such notice and copies of the Draft EIR to local and regional agencies. The City shall provide a list of local and regional agencies which are to receive the Draft EIR 5 Response to Comments on Draft EIR - The Consultant shall respond to all comments received on the Draft EIR and Incorporate such comments Into the Plnal EIR. rinal EIR - The Consultant shall be responsible to revise the Draft • EIR as directed by the Cltv in order to prepare the Final EIR Con- tents of the Final EIR shall be completed in conformance with Section 15146 of the State EIR Guidelines Task 8: Publ+- Hearings on Draft General Plan Dcacriptlon: The Consultant's principal-in-charge and project manager will attend one public hearing each of the Planning Commission and Ctt} Council to present the draft General Plan It is assumed that any changes made by the Planning Comissior will be communicated to the City Council in rho form of a Resolution or memorandum prepared by City staff The consultant will not be responsible for revising the plan In accordance with the Planning Com- mission's comments or amendments It is assumed that title hearing process will be coordinated with the hearings on the General Plan EIR Tack 9: Preparation of Adopted General Plan Description: The Consultant will revise the draft General Plan in accordance with the amendments adopted by the City Council In Task 8 The text shall be profusely Illustrated and be developed with the best possible graphic techniques A eclat "pnpnlar surmary" to fold out map /text form will be prepared to accompany the General Plan text A "1000" scale, colored presentation map shvuing the land use plan will size be prepared E%.,ry • effort will be made to prepare a map th.tt can be easily amended. -16- 22 Products: • a An adopted Ceneral Plan document. Including technical appendix. In loose -leaf format (200 copies). 40 k b. A color "popular suamary" of the General Plan (500 copies). c. A counted color "1000" scale presentation sip (one copy) d All maps In final approved form shall be on reproducible mylar cr sepia for City use, with one each print appropriately rendered in color Other Trips: Ore person -day trip to discuss design of adopted plan with City staff - Figure I which follows ;resents a proposed schedule for accoopllshlbs the above work program Figure 2 states Labor Costs uhlch will be used for any work required by the Consultant bond the ♦ork outlined Ir tit, [cope of cork. -17- Z3 M, 4 a • 4 1 � u M N � � I I 'G o 0 C � M 9 w G � Mpp -� pp Y] I O p W H K � C � T L � 7 O NOG 6 V O w Y q q I O O I 9 M.f C N L q y •d b p 9 O tlMI I y y C O 2 0 0 Y V G q Y O y PFE9 I 24 • a 19 FIGURE 2 Sedway /Cooke' orircipal .suciate Assistant Planner Resmach Assistant Senior Associate (Graphics) Assistant Planner (Graphics) TABLE 2 LABOR COSTS $55.00 per hour 30.00 per (sour 25,00 per (sour 15.00 per hour 32.50 per hour 25.00 per ho, Woodward -Clyde Consultants Principal $60.00 per hour Associates 55.00 per (sour Charles Salter Assoeiotas principal $35.00 per hour 'Fully burdened rotes include clerical costs -19- 2S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON.7A MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Jack lam, Director of Community Development SUBJDCf: Approval of contract for services witn MBGR to prepare Fiscal Impact Model for the City of Rancho Cucamonga On June 20, 1979, wo received a proposed Contract for services from the firm of f= to prepare a Fiscal Impact Model for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The purpose of this model is o evaluate the fiscal impacts of alternative future develonments, General Flan alternatives, City development rates of growth and cost and revenue_ alternatives The model will reveal impacts associated with both large and small scale developments and be used as a twl in evaluating the net assets or debits afforded the City by a project. 0 The Fiscal Model will require $50,000 to realize completion and will take 5 months to complete from start. Attached is a copy of the agreement for your review, we have met with the Consultant • and the Staff and the Consultant are in agreement RDCOMMMATION: It is feccmended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to sign the contact and direct staff to send A copy to M= for their signature Reap tct lve1ny ubmitted, Jac , 1 D tecwr of Community Development Jlax BKH:DJM:cc Attachment: Draft Agreement for oarvices with MSGk • 26 AGREE11CNT FOR CONSL_LTIINT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 1979, by and between the CITY OF RA11C110 CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and MKGK Incorporated, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant." I RCCITALS The City is desirous of obtaining the services of the Consultant to perform services consisting of (1) an analysis of the fiscal impact of alternative General Plans and programs, and (2i the • preparation of a computer -based fiscal impact model for evaluu iuq the fiscal impacts of alternative future developments, General Plan alternatives, city development rates c` growth and cost and revenue alternatives. The City and the Consultant, therefore, agree as follows: II SCOPE OF SCRVICLS The Consultare si.sli provide_ the services set forth in Attnchment A which is attach'A hereto and by this reference is modal a part hereof. In addition, tnc ConsultanL shall wort with the City's staff in con3unetion with its analysis and the formulation QE the fiscal model so as to ma:u mtze local weal The role or the 27 �M City staff and their relationship with the Consultant shall be generally as set forth in Part II of Attachment A, within the • provisions set forth in Part I of Attachment A, Work Tasks. The Consultant shall provide within the terms of this agreement no less than 10 person trips to the City of Rancho Cucamonga The staff and the Conrultant may agree upon a modification to the above interaction; provided, however, that no modification which .rould require an increase in the compensation to be paid the Consultant hereunder shall be valid unless and until approved by the City Council. III PERFOPMANCE BY PERSONNEL The Consultant may associate with or subcontract with associal.es • in the performance of its services under this Agreement but at all times shall be responsible for their services. The members of the Consultant staff who will be specifically assigned to lho project are Sheldon P. Cans, Principal- In- Cliargo; E Kent !leek, Project Director; Peter Bass, Leslie Wells, Janice Roudebush, and wilixam Kalton. The formal public presentatlolls shall be made by Sheldon P. Cans. IV cot iPUN SA r 1 ON The City agrees to pay the Consultant an amount licit to exceed the sum Of $50,000 for Tasks 1 -I for its aervicee reidered to the City pursuant to this Agiromont. LicU..led within Lite compmis,ition 29 • 9 - i - provided for this Agreement are all of Consultdnt's ordinary office and overhead expenses incurred by it, its agents and employees, including meetings with City representatives, and Osts to accumulate all need•d data. Prinrina vhir6 ;- requested by the City that exceeds the amount stated an this Agreement will be at cost plus 10%. Services requested, in writing, by the City in addition to those - set forth in this Agreement shall be compensated in accordance With the following schedule: Direct Labor Costs Sheldon P. Cans E Kent Meck Peter Bass Leslie Wells William Ralton Janice Roudebush Hourly rate including Ove head Administrative Burden n_ t P_�ofit $60 7v $45 67 $42.19 $39 66 $35 94 $22 24 'I_ravel and Per Ulem Esoenscs Cost of travel and per diem (up " naxrnirn of $40 per diem). 21? - 4 - V METHOD OF PAYMENT Consultant shall submi, monthly invoices stipulating services which have been satisfactorily completed and specifying a percentage of projected completion for each task for approval by City as set forth in the task /cost schedule below. City will pay norithly progress payments up to 909 of the total contract, or $45,000. Final payment will be made after approval and acceptance of the _ final task by the City. T.:k /Cost Schedule Task 1 Project Initiation $2,500 Task 2.1 Conceptual !lapping $5,000 Task 2.2 Review Check Napping $2,500 Task 2.3 Data /Assumption Ducumantatioi $10,000 Task 2.4 Adaptation of Computer Program $5,000 Task 2.5 First Run /Live Data $51000 Task 2 6 Twelve Runs and Analysis $10,000 Task 2.7 Final Documentation /Training $5,000 Task 3 Final Report and Presentations $5,000 vI IIITERESTS OF COXSULTAI -TS the Consultant covenants that it presently Iran no interests and slwll not acquire any interest, direct or indrrerL, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services contemplated by Lhis Agreemont l.o person having any such interest shall be omPloyed by or ar.soci..tvO with the ConsulLant. Vf7 FINnfIM CGirFIUEq IAL a -TERSHIe or REPJRTS, INF029ATIU.. ETC All of the repirts, information, data sM exhihiti prepared or assembled by Comultaut in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential and the Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization rithout the prior consent of the City: except to the extent ni ..ssary to facilitate staff and citizen involvement All such reports, information, date and exhitits shall be the property of the City and shall be delivered to the City upon demand without additional cost or expense to the City The program, as developed for the City will be retained as the City's model and not to be used by any other jurisdiction without the consent of he City Article VII.1 Product Enhancement and Coordination ® Urban Consultant is expected to use innovation in dt,lopment of the work effort and provide the beat product to the City for the use intented In furtherance of this goal. Consultant shall cooperate and coordinate its activities and information with the City's General Plan Consultant (Sedway /Cooke) VIII TERI: The Consultant agrees to complete all phases of the Agreement within the time allocated in the following schedule Tasks 1 through 2 5 three (31 calendar months after approval of Agreewnti Task 2 6 four (e) calendar rnnths after approval of Aq[eeaent Tasks 2 7 and 1 five (5) calendar nonthn after approval of Agreement, a- set forth in Part III of Attachnnnt A The Consultant furthew agrees to ccmmmnce work w.thin ten (10) worki r days at or the into of this Aarecmrnt and Pursue said ark diligently and expedltiously in accordarce with the work 31 r. schedule. The City retains the right to terminate this contract on fifteen days' wri•ten notice to the consultant without further action. :ho Consultant retains the right to terminate with cause. In the event of such termination of this Agreement, the City shall pay the Consultant for the work accomplished and the cost of preparing a summary report of work completed to the date of .:aid termination which shall be submitted to the City prior to said payment. Ix NOTICES Any notices required to be given hereunder shill be in writing with copies as directed herein and shall be personally served or given by mail Any notice given by mail rhall he duemed to • have been given which deposited in the United State mails, certi- fied and postage prepaid, address ^d t� the party to be served as follows: To City: City or Rancho Cucamonga P n. 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California At,entlen: Hr I.,ck -am, Director of Community Development To Consultant: n. .,. 1p.-ornvmat -0 2d2 Coluruun Avenge, Suite 300 Sin rr...ctscn, Ca 94133 Attvntton: ftr Sheldon P. Cans r 1 U 312 - 7 - ASS 1l::lilEi:T The Consultant shall not assign or otherwise transfer its right and obligations under this Agreemen• without prior written consent of the City. Any such assignment wit`tout such consent shall be void and shall, at the option of the City, terminate this Agreement City may employ additional consultants as it deems necessary to work with Consultant any time during the term of this contract. XI EXTEIIT OF AGRERIU:NT This Agreement represents the entire integrated agreements between the City and the Consultant and supersedes all prior negoLiations, representations or agreements, either writtrn o, r,ral This • ..greement may be amended only by written instrumen- siqned by both the City and the Consultant. l'J ,tote The last page was the signature page I did not run this Signed Beverly Authelet r�� 0 0 IMACIIMCNT A SCOPE OF SFRVICES RANCHO CUCANONGA FISCAL IMPACT MODCI. 34 PART 1: WORK TASKS • TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION The purpose of this task is to launch the proposed project on a c firm and consistent foundation through further refinement of the initial proposal into n conceptual approach and a work program based on reviews with local planning staff. Essentially, 11KGK's objective is to gain a more detailed understanding of the Particular planning context for which Lite fiscal impact analysis is to be used During this phase, Lorking relationships between staff and consultant are developed. The following subtai':s ado_ involved in the Project Initiation phase (the first three listed can all occur during the first site visits by tite consultant): 7:ubtas_ 1.1: Initial Review Fleeting • lmmedietely upon notification of the contract award, the consultant will schedule a project initiation meeting on site in the City wi , the City's liaison personnel. The purpose of Lite meeting will be to secure the following: • Obtain clier., comments and perspectives rrrardiug both the technical and management asperLS of Lite accepted proposal e Review Lhe current planning pro -es: 11111 ac LjviLicr• und,: -- takcn L7 th,+ client and their rclaLU,n -rtp In the: fiscal impact study • TsolaLO isruos of p.0 1icnla, local ro•k ^tn and di•:cuse: potential applicntinn:: of the ftcc,l ii.pact analysis modal • (c q , for what spe, ,fir. purpn :es i t vi I I I,- u:.rd, how of Len, which stafL will ust• it, oL,: ) 3-45 o Specify the key local dectaun- makers who will be: involved • in `he protect and daterwiuc their roles and responsibcli. tieb • Develop a consensus concerning propose :i project milestones, identify potential operational problems, and refine manage- ment strategies. • Obtain concurrence regarding procedures to ensure adequate client /contractor intarface and quality control. • Translate the. CILW s related other objectives into specific work task items Each of ..hose items, as well au other general scope and timing. issues, will be discussed during this meeting. The meeting should permit the IIKGK Project Team to establish required • linkages and to initiate all project activitien in a cost effective manner. Subtask 1 2: Collection of Background Data Based on the results of the initial meeting, Project Team members Will begin to acquire existing docuaentation relevant to the project, such as: s Cxir.ting plans and studies rel.•tiru to land usv, mousing, population grottth. Cconortc gtnt,lh, community devclopmrnt, CLC ; tine updalo of r•roaoiu n•td populaliou Projections and land use and hnusrug denan•ts is a pritre example ft R-Nional and oLh•t ort•a -: ndr 9�•t '.t.s t:1 plats t,ilich place the local c,wununity in I.:tgor ronit•a. 3� - i - o Data relating to local operattng and service en-Ls, e tax rates, appropriations, and local rovcuups -- working papers, technical nemus and other infor- mation will be needed prior to the point a find report is completed. Other such data may include published local budgets, in -horse documents providing more detailed information on costs and service standards, state and federal subvention formula, etc. • Such other information as deemel relevant by the local staff and as a result of the discussions of Subtask 1.1. This background data collection phase will Lak,- place during the some site visit as Subtask I.I. Acquisition of Lhis information, plus its subsequent review and analysis, will - allow the Project Team's technical activities to he firmly -- rooted in the economic, planning, demographic and financial trends and relationships or the City and iLs environs During this process, the Team will also become familiar with sources for further data collection and with the geo Jraphical /physical context of the local community. Subtask 1.3: Initial Specification of Fiscal LirpntL Analysis flodel Out "tt Concurrent with this firsL visit with the client., the Project Team will hold initial discussion sessions with relevant local staff to outline (in Lhe nionL ptolinntaty tout) a noL of Lablen IhaL will output the dostred ttnlaict information ilty iasue to be explorud will inclpd•. such items ins the desired level of detail, Lhc nu.uber avid Ien,lh or Lime periods (i.(' , annual, bi- annual), etc ), how mica -widt• and /or nubscctor models 3;2 •J. ale to be used, and consequently th^ number, content. and suc- cession of each outoul table Tire Project Tenn would use tire • tables prepared for similar projects a< a point of departure for discussions, besired client changes and comments would then be noted. This information will be invaluable in terms of completing the detailed conceptual mapping of Task 2 1, and arould minimize the effort required to determine the most appropriate outrut information +I Subtask 1.4: Finalization of the Work Plan Dazed on the results of the revie.+ r.eeting, data collection, site visit and subsequent data review, fl,SK will fir,0117C the project work plan originally proposed. Special emphasis will be given to the following: Specifying the content ^rd sequencing of -111 ,arojert tasks and substaks, i1,cluding their intt•rrel.,ttoiishlps and procedures. t. Tdentifyinq r),e respective roles and re ^pon J blliLios of both the t11:GR project team and local Liaison staff. s Ficalazinq the management appzc3rh, inrindin•1 the projerl. organization, staff assignments, estimated per :n•r- ioadtng by task, mid estimat nl compte Linn dat ^s: and sperifying the precise assumptions upon wiut.h LIZ: rstlmatoa are boscd. o RcCintnti Lntetn.il -11,11 external �•, �. ird unl um prp,;..,lut r:, "'It's plan, essentially a final modification oC this proposal, will, after being rovicwed and accepted by the City, be used • as the "benchmark" against which subsequent project performance and objective attainment will be measured TASI: 2 : ADAPTATION OF FISCAL IMPACT HUDEL 10 C1TY ACD AtITt,YS1S OF UEVELOPAIENT, POLICY SCI:NAR105 This task involves the fallowing steps: a Orienting IIROIC's Fiscal Impact tlode, Lo th^ specific analysis objectives of the City's project and 11mtW tioiz of local data availability • Working with local staff to cl.rily and translate into relevant input terms the various dove lol•.nont Options to be tested. and policy e Collecting necessary inpvl data; running the model; analyzing and interpreting the results o Documenting input assumptions, metliodolo:Iy, model operation o Trarning staff in on -going model usage. The task is comprised of the folloc+ing sub- elerant.s. Ta-.1: _2 1: Oetailod Cun_eptual fin pr,t n•i This Lask aeeo,�pl;shco the design of a•.; stlu_ ur•.1, C mat, an,, ranrent c•hange•: proposed ill Uu speedo client adanLatron of Lh•• Frecnl Imp.ict H0,1e I. SpeetCrc tihI <• form it real i•nta, :.r lucnce and uuLput ingie i ill I•e dr i , • 1 I" I rui tore dad • 3� sequence of the input data will Ix' simIIatly mapped out, as is a eproposed identification code fur the inp..l ,;+tn Parallel efforts identify the types and categories of ac':umP: ion- noc•dccl to trans- late development /policy options into croaomic /fiscal terms. l..istly, the format and content of the data PCetl•^, of th•: local model will be precisely spelled out and a data collection / dovelopment plan produced. Accomplishment of this task basically achieves the "design" of the fiscal impact analysis withi-, the opora Ling - context of IIKCK's fiscal impact progranning systcn. Subtask 2 1 1: Conceptual Approach to Analy is A working Paper will be developed that outlines MCK's rccor.nen- dations as to the beat conceptual approach for analyzing the • specific isauec raised by the Lily in the L+ro}ec� Initiation phase This pacer will outline in mire detail the m. Lhodology to be used to produce the desired analytical results This proposed paper will be sent Lo the City simullancoualy will, those produced by subtasks 2.1.2 and 2 1.3 below. Subtask 2.1.2: Table ro rrtt Content all-, G n•rot L,nl. rtes Based on the outcome of the discussions in Subtask 1.2 (Initial Spoc,f,cation of ftodel Output) and conrrptn.al werl: rn fnl,t.1,4L 2 1 1, tho Prolcct Team will devolop , de,n,l.•rI r!. . eo.1 proposed table, lir.Ling thn exact ord•_r and dotal] of line ttcme, a•: well as the column henrirngs and Liti -r An r• >.nrplo n PP, KWA 7 - of such a table is shown on the followin.; l:xhibtL 1, A Working Paper containing copies of all the proposed tables and notes on their derivation will be developed This document will specify the manner in which information produced in one table is used, carried over and combined with information in another table to pro3uce new aggregates. This "logic" sequencing of the tables will be dnveloped and used as a basis for developing ar modifying the approprinLC Report layout Files (the output. table generation programs). It serves as the "map" for programming purposes. Subtask 2 1 3: Input rile Design The categories and formal of the input. data will be developed based on: (1) the desired output fornaLS: (2) an unders Landing • of the types and quality of data available fr" the client and other sources; and (3) consideration of the typos of variables the client wants the model to test During this tank, a draft "activity" identification and coding catalog will he developed: this basically identifies the type and location nC each piece of data Lhat will be needed to run the model, nu well ns the "coding" number and form that will b" ured Ln vventually input iL An example of such on activiLf uhnl fit it ion f o ie. shc.om in Exhibit 2 (pages 4 - I,) Sinilarl, , 7 3 (r., s 14 - 1,) rho ✓a Sol"' exmnples of the types of c0ling fu:ins LhaL will b^ developed for inpultuul data. 0 14/ CITY'S UL:d L1.T IV r. LAI'CT1d 1 _S., _, r'.-I i l'..•+'d 3"p5 1991 Erlorc to to After _1976 1916 1977 1935 3990 1995 1995 L'a -,:. and Associated Landscaping: Thruaaya r.• r ,-u ny v Collector: Btid;;es, Interchanges, and Ilisc_ SeStotal —Roads Ste= Draiaa ^e: Ilnjor Facilities ilinoc Iaproveaects Scbtctal —Stom Drainage Paci:s and Recreation: I..rnd Acquisition Co =unity Park Developuent Contributic-s to Schaol /Other Playiields /Sport. £acilltics itatura F "eserves IIugc=s and Per-forming Arts Facilities loo 11ode1 Far Coastal Preserve Contributions to Regional rar&c • SuStotal— Parts and recreation Trails end Bikeway Syntm Pudic buildings: CLt7 Nall Coaplca. roUce and Justice Facilities Ftrc Stations tmL -a1 Pound Corporation Yard and Maintenance rocllitica Lib=rles District civic Facilities Crbtotai— Public Buildings _- Cir, Cantrlbutlons to Other ruhlic/ i- Public r:cilitics: V,nril /Phys Leal ilralth Facilities Inyeare Certera f -n inr /JuvrrL!c Cor3unity G•rrers Uth••r !n'•i n ^al —Cil J Contributions "r• -sit and Solid Uo - ;e Dio, ,it Sy -rr-a: 7,,n:it Syst -n Egoipront an-1 Faeilitle, 1:u 1. rd Itastc Disposal Equips ^rr end 1.•r, tit i•••. __- ® S'bto1 �1 -- Transit and Solid lI•:rr Di_pn•,.l' «_ Il. ,. llanrnt,s: List hens Here (ii any) UY ,L— C.l'iTAL DIPCOMIEh'IS 11Y CITY LSIIL t! 2 CO:a^UTE ItIDUr FILE— GE1:7RAL CIfr MOLL COST k"D ICSVLAUF 1TE% CWT' tl "IJ_; S • Tf1u folloving item numbers have been assigned to the various cost rad revenue factors used in the no,':l. These item tl"-bers Lrep crack of the zrfe;enecsl facto rn doting "Comaut0 and "Report" phases of model operation. "Rcse"aX, cntegories are available for later addition of more items. I. LRR) USES (Activities 01 -53 Inclusive) A. Sv=ar7 Items eust be expressed in an incre;ental unit (c.g., $ per person/ ncre added, $ ioer ... e per period, $ ler every ), people added, etc.) and not cumulative amounts (l.c., tutcl dollars; per period). the Activity numbers beside no item Indicate the frrivities I, uhich darn cam be entered vithout hinting to codify the Report Lnyout Fllen. For Activities not listed, model will not currently PICIA up the item In the Report Phase. Code P Item 1 -30 Capital Erpendtturry by City • 31 -50 flaintemance Costs on City Develrped Fnc!1![le, 51 -60 Maintenance Costs on Dcvcicper 8ulic Facilteivs 61 -85 Operating Casts 85 -89 (Reserved) 90 -99 C'ty Revenues T. Dc-ail 1. Capital Costs 1 -10• Fcads and Dralucce 1 -10 (Reserved) 11 -15: rnrhn rnd C.•creat Lon 11 Co:crunity 1•arl.. 1.1111 tcc•11:1ticn i ((A"r 2a r'!J) 12 (' 'rlty 1"1i1: ,v,•lp- •nt 25 Only) 11 Cnp- .ivnl[y 1'a r1: :: (i „•r...a vd) lk -1i (eeserved) •, ]6 -211• !'ubl[L Dvil,llu 16 Tr:w.rn hall (•.• -.. �r,l) O 11 fallen Sr •t Inn•. 1L• 111strict C,ntcr: (1'••�rnrd) (%•at 25 -53) 19 -20 (neserved) �3 1 _.bib [t Y Coee_le. � •a 21 -30: Pnelnnent 21 Police rquLpmen- (Act. 25-53) 22 lbrrr.ency Tro +Ortaticm E,ulPcent 23 -25 (I enarved) 26 Transit Veleicics 27 Solid Uasto Pickup Trucks 28 -30 (Reserved) 2. 111ntcnsacc eostr on City Du11C Factlltira (ActivltLes 31 -50). 31 -40: Y.oads end Dralndge 31 Roadways (Act. 25 -53) 32 -37 (Rese;ed) (Act. 25 -53) 30 Draiw.le 29 -40 (Reserved) 41 -45: Parks sad Recreation 41 Coc•ut.ty Parks: L.r,dsc-p LnF (Act. 25 Only) 42 Cr—usity Parks. Fa<Llltle9 43 -44 ( Resarved) (Act. (' \ Only) 51 ) 45 Undeveloped Open SPace 46-50: Public DwLldlncs and Otl•et • 1.6 Fubllc bulldlr.^,s (Act. 25 only) 47 -50 (Reserved 3. 1L•tintencatc Costs an Dem•loen•r Cuilt Facilities (4ct 51 -60) 51 -55: Roads cnd Draln., r 51 P.nadvays: final Hointenance (f.ct. 25 -53) 52 Hordways. ftesurlaclnR v 53 Dralnagc 54 -55 (Reserved) 56 -60: Packs, Prceeatiun nrd O[4tr 56 Dev'•loper iiullt 0prn Space/ F••lRhborhood Park.^. (frt. 25 Onl+) 59 D•celoPer LU11t rlPctta L -s 60 (reserv••d) 4. Opuratlr f•.sts "" i_t[1• s f•l -/nl 6uunci 1. IL•nd +r r_ (a. _k _•nd -A tn�d •_(f.rl :v'ti 61 .GJ) ® GL Courell, C n %er, CI of :. •1 At ror•e •y (M t. 71 Ondy) 62 (e:rsrtvrd) 1 , 6 I.a6lblt 2 C;.11tiuu••1 PI- nnit:^ (Activlty 63) 63 Planning (Act. 23 Only) • Building, Inspections ( Activitiys 6: -65) 64 Land Developaent /rrocessiz3 Costs (Act. 25 -53) 65 Building Permit Procesalcg Public Safety (Activities 66 -75)• 66 Police Servlcn: Officers ( \cc. 25 -53) 67 Police ;crvice: Car Leasing/ Cultural Arts /Seniors Pro.ra_s Ilydnt a aance 78-60 68 Police Service: Equipeaat Public Wozl.s P. ^_p] aeeaent " 69 F,buluaca Service: Personnel 70 P bulancc Service: Vehicle veserved) Vaintenanco :1 ILLstrliaacous Pregr =s: Per Capita (Act. 25 Onlvl 72 -75 (Reserved) Parks m1 Recreation (Activities 76 -110) 76 Recreation and Youth Prr,,,I=s (AU. 25 Only) 77 Cultural Arts /Seniors Pro.ra_s 78-60 (Rrsezvrd) Public Wozl.s Po ^ulatlon Based Erpendicuces (Feserved) veserved) es 86 -89 ,0 -99) :erce Sharing (Act. 25 Only) en (Act. 26 -53) . . . .. Yazen on I7rvelc2acnt ActLvltiPS ( Reserved) J3 Recreation r.•,v (Act. 25 Only) 94 tlplrl 7.rt•••� (lt ✓tirr t•••tl) 95 Ot hrr .z -nd t'rr•s 96 'it ilf tr S•1• ry r, rd '• 97 C •. Ta I+md '• 93 Ir. let i -• I • ( -`s ) 99 A••sesned Vnlur I•r•r her•• licrupir•I (far. 01 -53) �5 .I L I•.ht nit 2 t_t•nL Im'ed 1!. FLTatt: 70: ^:.ROE COST ITM!S —L;utr n11 ;. ( ;,:•b.�r',s G4-Si) A. Roads end Draioa;e (Activities f(• -75) Code P II_ 1 Capital Coots (Per Unit) 21 Annual 113inteaance ousts " 22 Periodic Resurfacing /Replacement (Total Per period) it. Parks aid Pecreation (Activities 76 -E9) Dikevays —Class I (Activity 76) 1 Capital Costa (Per Unit) 2 Series AID; ponds (Iotal per Period) 21 Annual 11ainteannco Costa (Per Unit) Ill. I7IM, Cu= .:1!nE COST IMIS— SCI'EOLILID DAL1 (Art•y -•e:, n6 -9i) A. Cao!tzl Coats (7ctivlttos 85 -90) Total ?ollar =DLRta per period: • F.o.•ca and Drainace (ActJVJtV R6) 1. Traffic Safety 2. Sereetncapes 3. Transit Projects 4, ilscellaneous Strret Projects (1975 -1930) S. Miscellaneous Projects (198L -2070) parks and F.aereation ( Artivity 87 1. Muse= 2 Perforn!aa Arco Center 3. 7oa 4. Spo_-tn Center $. Or-a Space ru: ch.ter 6 Co =u�!ty par!•. — Series A 111 nand: 7 tllxel_nnrv,n 1'trl• 1'ro(ee[:— (In7;- " t) !' !!' ^•crl lan ^ol, 11v.. -I rrolrrt - (!nA: 9. \'ilia 1', far :: 1 n•' lt;u :'•tan 10 V +Ile ^•• 14 1•rrk Land 1) vrlrr,,r 1'ubl L, 1u L'..1nL (A,tev,ry On) 1. T4vd,nll A Leal rmn,d it 'U,_ccllvnro„s rustic t .n) 12.. .. .. 4V ,. //__' (nEll- :('Jut '..11tbLL 2 CoeL1w,,_j 11 " )vu Lament (Activity 011) 1. Purchase of Tree tiatutenance YquLpxra 11. Ma!acenaace /Operetinn Costc (ActL,itien 91 -92) • Vaircenanrc (Activity 91) 1. Tree Maintenance by Public Uorks (Total Per Prrlod) 2. Series A/B Bond Co=unity Parks (increase per Period) 3. 11eighborhood Parks Unier Conatructloa 11 0 eratioas (Activity 92) Total dollar amounts per period: 1. Plam -Ing Department—General Op- zations 2. C==Lty Services— Senior Litizens /Cultural Arty n1se 3. Public Works— General Adr•aletra'lon /Fquip:ent Ilr!atennate IV. VIT:RB T0-1. 9Z SC1sDULE P_ 2SJE (Activlri :S) Total dollar rmoentt per periods 1. Notel/"otel Tas 2. Interest ar.i Miscellaneous Revenue 3. Leneal Revenue Sharing • V. 1: (T'r lU IttSC UN11S07S SCnrDULLU DA \ (Actirlty 92) .. (See Input Data Sequence —Page 11 -20) w A h e w 11 147 T =.n. A. 1,.&^ 0 9. loot AL D"..t Cm.t. T.b Fn U%7 I/nC.l•: :L:• Lw Acc• -'n B..d.n w Iedvaelal L,ed y.., 'J Z-1 LIFE , 0. �� 0. 0 Act 0 L Ac[,n• LL-•e All IAJ+tsa O.u.11T 20CCO, -A. LLt].c If p r. sa•• is 3aat .w. 3, Ifev,tr. cter •la. 7'pL pr •cc• t!.• =[.a)• S12m1 H•d•la. h.•Il!A} luie+ Y Ks• [Lve .r A.a• lllr (A). w os1.r wa v,.. A A 0 L Acr•,as t!ri• All Urd•La U. +all) Icen, \•., e.A Iae LrLae• [F 10 IC- :l e fa.ee 4.[ /Te,.,•• fierce: 2ra!d.a.Ll Lad U•a• F23;: . 1. 0. 0, o, o r.. eat)• frr CLry 23. :e•c.na, e,•e e•rt. e: vefc 0.0 A A A<t. 0 L U -I[ L• -te [rt f I- Duo, , o, D. D, n, 0 t U.• f..c t.-:1 Cl" ..aT-�7'/�r14}/ % r•�.•.- �t M4 t• :m U. Vulule bouts o Acres Drvuloued nee {'.•: 1•,_i C-) A B C 11 ll D � 11101 ___ ..... Act. 0 All 110dels: Same Lomat and d; to sequnce. A: Acres developed before nid -1975. B: Period vol=c begins (1 -9) C: V=ber of periods scbeduled (1 -9) _ D: Vol=e by period (Io ec:cs). NO co:,--- ,.ter last nu_ber. o Con•rol Card C-2 - - 11711 0, 1, 0 Act. 0 All lfodelt: S=e fomaL end data sequence. o Units Started: Scheduled Unt: Cu::t Item, A B C D 1) C -3 - 10200 , . 0, Act. 0 All tfodels: S=e fomet and data uequcnce. A Unitc rterted before ntd -1975, t•.8., linoar fort of D. Period vol=r hrgl•1s (1 -4) C. Suabvc of periods nrhodu'__d (1 -4)• D Vol, f,, rerlod (fr r,•)e , lout uur,ber. :•)• 1.• eo —z rfLCr 1 • 'j I 6 � ' m•, lun••d - U. halt. Tar=p L-:rn • e l'er Untt (A) Added: Short Fon A U C U-1 - - I - - 10 - -• 2. 1• — • 0 Act. Item 0 0 A. Calculation Method (Type of Unit) Cit7 110delo: 1: 1=0 t per person added 1i: Anouat per acre added 6: Mount per unit started (specified type of ualt) School Y.odsls: 1: Amount per duelling unit e'_ded. 4: Amount per acre added • B. Unit Iaovnt per Calculation llcthol All model,: e.U., $4,500 /acre - 4500 C. Assessment La All Models: e Itrn Cod_n 01 ti-rough ge 0 A11 cases. e Item Cude 99 0 1 I land uoes 011, vol,.. d`r: G'•ynad Fe.–LOA 6. 1G i nt L.,L 1 . ,I vn' r d a., tI 1'vrlud N A � C A•s. Ices 0. 9 0 D L p C Q A. Cdc.Lana N•:hs3 h.n. e! l'a•d City \.ad•L, It Acwt rat Patera •df.d Gt Ae t per Acre .Cdrl 6: Aaoaet PAC watt et•ttcd (.p.citt,d tT of u:t) (lsti,lct., 65-91 c.I7) 9: Asset p•: Nth p•r.w .Saud (test.et lt. 1.23 uet,) 0a t p•r, Ntl. act* .dd•d (Aetie tia+ 26-11 rely) Stbeel "Alat 1: 1e - pet ..T..4; I. addd. {: Arn.a: par •u. rdded. L ratt xmmt n,r Caleulre ton Y.tbed All !!o[•laa eltn SLID) /acre ^ GSCO SI /bT00) .^. tit by [S Illl] r•. ^ I:[OtDJ (ao sear S.a da:a) eel Yed•LC SS A:A pa[ tote, .vielpl� b, 1000 C. A +vusrt Li All. ,k2.Lt w Irr. Cod.. CI Ll ..36 93: 0 A, It.. Code 99 0: A11 IAAA u•.• tr:[h .o:cw d• r bte -1 r,rl•d 6. 19: C.e1de:L1 U.1 u••. t•tib v.'u Cats tbwyl reread 3 mlf. b. Ale,,t b.fev ittt -19Ta I.11 ,bd•la: _ 15t,r Ht.ea7 p.rlae taeal (Dell,:. _ , Cchc.l )'cd.la: It A=. "aclplr by I_n b. Ytl+ tat' Data Al. Ibdala: (D.. vttb Calcvl.•tlea N•:`r.d 9 ral7) later o• petpta e. see, t+.d,d to trt,i+: eh.v, r..g., 13311 paepl• ear ra=w !--r pack - 13331 0 I! r+ A:1 ,f ft trinet or -rat tcfir eo.r it. 9. 1.... G.tcul nte, r rSvd. 9. LL tt Cal- JA Yaddn Of Calculate er: wU colt, „! /e[ t-'l i•rt.J. nu, 0•. t. r. ..d 1! alwo. 1: C.lc.Lett, b.pten v ,r- t:•t•_ re—l. 2: a ltulattea btsl At •pat Rttd •v.. C mot. Atl 1•N.b: q. L• c 1- /tl Y•d•l+ , If 1 -Ia n! .e•1� n • -, rend 4n - t. •G�, v.l vl LS Ig1r a_rte P.t., wn ')� • -.: L w.... r. ..to CJ i • E. Scheduled Costs /Favonues A tun A rs c n n 1 17730 10 • 2. 1. 0• . 0. , . .... Act. Item 0 0 All Models: Sas fotmat and data Sequent.*: A. Dollar amount or level as of mid -1975. B. Period scbedulfag begins (1 -9) C. N=ber of periods scheduled (1 -9) D. Dollar amounts by period Ilo coca after last number. F. Scheduled ILscelleneous Datn A II C D E E F -1 - - 5 _ - 00 , 05, 99, • Act. Item ••' 0 0 Ri All Models: Sae format and data requeacc A. Item Code I:umber: Store .is in Identification Block. B. Ilstory =Uat: AS of mid -1975 C. Period stheduUng begins (1 -9). D. Mlm!)er of periods scheduled (1 -9). E. Amount by period. ?'a cr _a rttcr 1:.t nl ^h «r SZ Il - Subtask 2.1 4 Data Specification Content and format specifications for all data needed to run the model will be outlined in a proposed "assumption document" This document will list, for each functional area (e.g., costs - capiLal costs by function, maintenance and operations costs by department, etc.; revenues from property taxes, sales taxes, and other different sources); how each item is to be expressed (e.g., dollars per acre of residential land developed, amount per year, dollars per unit and number of units per 1,000 people, etc ), or what are the range of options (e g , w;LL costs, aggregates, functions of other costs) This first draft of tho assumptians document will be based on a review of all the available cost, revenue, financial and planning standards data available from the City and oLhcr sourcca. IL will br revised and modified several times during the d.ita collection phase (Task. 2.2). At this point, a precise data collection plan will also be specified, indicating who (consultant antl /or client staff members) is responsible for which pieces o, data and when they will be needed. Task 2.2: Revi.w, Approve and Check Concrptn, it.nlrl This task achieves client "sign -off" on tin., cunc•ptu :l model adaptations propoacd b(,forc rcproora.-r.0 and I,r, r.11_ction efforts get too far advancod. 63 W a¢I_ 2 1 Discus lion and nevie_of noirl ,md DaLa ` • Tho principal products reviewed by the client at this time are the conceptual background (Subtask 2 1 1) , the proposed output tables (Working Paper resulting from Subtask 2.1.2); and the Assumptions Document and data collection Plan (Subtask 2 1 A) a The client must basically agree as to the level Of detail and nature of the proposed output, as well as having an understanding A, as to the quality of the data and the foundation or the assumptions 6 and computations forming the model. Sign -orf on Lite data collection plan is important because iL can usually be expected to require an important ^ommitment of sLa Cf resources and prior' i tics of, given the absence of this action, an increase in the amount of consultant time spent on this task. This wurk will i . comprise part of the Interim Report sub Lask 2 2 2; Modifications or conceptual Plan Any modifications in the conceptual plan required as a result of the review process in Subtash 2,2.1 are made aL Lhis point, l:orking documents are edited to reflect the chanqus It i. generally not anticipated that another romple Le clele of revicu and modification would be necessary unlens eery major ch.unlo•, core made; nose litrly, neon cumpleti(,u or v,itl ut•1 Uu• changua, Lire consultant would •.oud Lite rte ive•: cone rp�v.,l play, Lo Lite client, uhile pioLee4in•. directly to To t, 2 f J! Subtask 2.2.3: Acceptance by LlicnL • Client is expected to formally sign -off of the various elements of the conceptual plan before proceeding to Task 2 .4 and beyonu. Task 2.3: Data Collection and AsSunption DOCunulitation This task achieves the collection, pEoper for,nattiny and documentation of all the assumptions to be used in the model. Usually, the larger part of the assumptions will be hold constant between i ns (such as the number of previously _ developed acres of different types of land, present levels of assessment, revenue flow.- from various taxes, most service standards, etc.), although any, in theory, could be varied. Thin task involves the qualification or 1111 as ^umptions that • make up a run It is the single largest and most Lime con- suming of all the tasks. Subtask 2. 3.1: Raw Uata COlIL`CL'o' This task begins the execution of th data collection plan adopLcd in Subtask 2 1.4 an +l approved to Subla;.l: 2 2 d nasically that plan speciCicd Lhc final fovnat and content of each piece of daLa needed for Lhc rul-I :6ta s.bLas` ttnolv35 the collection of Liu tav dilo (,It t.hicli tt at input data Is to be hasod Col lectt •m of n,.+ oat , wt t 1 I � by cun:,olLaut and /or clionl stnl l i- :.I •ct f tcd in Lit daLa L 555 • collection plan. M example might be me isurrng off on maps the number of acres of different types of land uses to be developed each year under different scenarios; or alterna- ti�ely, figuring out the design standards and unit costs of w '.!ems going into a typical netghborhood part:, As mentioned iearlier, City staff time is anticinater' to be reouirod on t this task Subtask 2.3 2: Review, Analyse and Convcr, to ittintt Cormat The raw data collected is reviewed and analyc ^d for conversion _ 1 into the input categories required for the model. For example, using the above cases mentioned in Subtask 2 T 1, the number ! of acres of residential land in different secLionn of a city • might need to be consolidated into a city -% :too total by hand; similarly, the above information on part: sLandatds might have 5 to be reduced to an aggregate average cost per acre of developed park Similar conversions of all of the rda data available have to he made. The end result is Lo have a rvL of data and assumptions about costs and revenues tint can hr accepted by the model City staff time is anticipated on this task irk 2.3. 3 inn ^f In �n This is actually au int ^•tral, lo�i1 a _ ^n ,iru r' t=•!tark 2 3.2, but its product to :.n imt,•,rl.ia' that it d• •.r , von sr•paraLe rention Tt i•. r'urtd lh r .tt r. 1• -,it nt the .z - 1 - model development process all or the cost. reaenue, develop- • ment and other assumptions actually used in tho model be documented clearly and completely. This is es:ential to allowing others to understand the basis and validity of model computations and outputs, and to know where to loo'c if they want to change or test certain assumptions This assumption document is usually tine - Consuming Lo create., buL an essential reference if the model is to ba us:d in any sort. of continuous fashion, and if iLs output is Lo be understood Subtask 2.3 4: Review of Input Assurpcions , The draft document of input assumptions is usually circulated among relevant staff and others concerned for review and com- ment Usually, some crucial sort of data needed for Lhe model is missing in one aroa or another and sane gross assumptions have to be made; these arci then tested by caposutc to all parties concerned as to theft reaso..?bleness and adequacy. It is sometimes al-,a found that another better (i.c , rare accurate or converient) or different way of m•xhling a partic- ular cost or rove•tue area is advisable (based rnt tb^ data availability or the ttte needed to get it into tl2 ,riginal proposed form). This may re•tuire some ebony.•:. t, Ih• con - ceptual plan mu' editing of Lhe cumpntti ptng, va all at these issues are raised and dtocusso•t d..t tn,, t ,i: ph: r.o and snlutions proposed • 5 - ,4 - FI-htast, 2 3 5: flo.li ions 1111 Finaliedti• n of Inpu! .lc;u *It in bons — - -- -- Tile assumption docume c modified to reflect the issues and needs arising from the review of Subtask 3 3 n The revised assumptions re °lect those that will be inputtc•( and used in the early run.: of the model (it should be noted that Lhey themselves can be changed and varied later if Lhe client wishes to undertake runs to test the sensitivity of results Lo changes in the basic acsunptions). Any necnss•rry changes in the conceptual plan (e g., input identification catalog) and model programs (c.g , Report layout files) are made and documented. T.:IO. 2 A: Adaptation of Comput r Proyramn awl /or Generation — During this phdso, the various technical and clel.cal stepn necessary to insure smooth computer use or the 11V1dlfied conceptual model are made. This work usually involves "coping" (or programming) any modifications or ndditrous to the Report Giyout Files; coding a complete Comp „l, Inl.ut liln using "aGlmmy” data: developing finalized anpcnpriata coaincl docu- monlation systems and records; phyr.icrliv un „iii ur•1 lire rnfor nation into Litt, aya Lem pr r (rnnnr I r unn�y •• run; and appropriate error corm-( t inn, 3h ^s•. .j- r r nv••. (c it l• .1 ••nudel development” are usually drnr• "•r cgrul.m•nt in itl'Gl; Offices; the client. door, not I�.rvn lc, rn.t iIl hr•: <•vn syslnra until later N Subtask 2 . 4 1: )lodifl'iny /Adal u)n to the Rcleorl_[a •ou] t Files 4 The Report Layout Files are the pro;rams that control the format and content of the output tables. Any changes or aOditions to these tables growing out of the approved con - ceptual model design (see Subtask 2 2 1 above) mast be "programmed," i.e., coded up and inputted into the machine The coding is done in this phase oy writiv)r out the necessary symbolic sequencies. Subtt ... 2 S 2: Coding a Dummy Cc -%)utc InPa 1 Fi lc and - DacumcnLng Lt - A complete compute input file (the Lasir da;a oit land use, co -Ls, revenues, rah of giowtn, etc.) is co•1ed up attd each line docunontcd in the form of at. `annotated' compute fnpuL file This coding asscally begins beforn the c..-.ta collection activities of Test: 2 3 have prndoced firm data it- all areas. Dumnry data is used at this point for two re sons: (1) it is desired to run a "test" of the revisecl model that uses data that is easy to check through on a nrunal rvn and (2) ti:c Bala cr.lcction activities of parallel Tack 2 3 gcnerally do not produce usable real data tais early in the proton_. The d. La is coded on luput shootn and .u, .•1)I,copt tt• utxliuq c.,Lalog developed Thts tall vc•ive a• ill- re( \a•uo.• point i• :ainst which all fulut c• cJtargc: in iupaL (I it ) by indivitln ti line can be noted In the fu�ute, Lo.t,larisvn t C uuxliried copies of this document pr,ivid, o it n -.•htl rero:d of c•h.mgen • in assumptions nado in a•ach dtllecent run. - 'U - Subtask ' 4 l: physical 11IpuL -Into �lirl.Lac row Correction Coded changes to the Report I -iyout Files, and the dummy Compute Input File nre inputted into permanent file SLorag-, an the computer system. usually the initial files are key punched by clerical staff and inputted via a high speed care reader; later input. changes and additionn are usually done via tine - sharing at the local conputer keyboard tcrmival. The use of each method is determined oil the basis of the cost - effectiveness involved. Completion of tills task involves revio•+inl the file inputted, checking and editing typog"Ph- ical and other input errors Subtask 2 .4 4: Dumr..y Run and Initial ucbuaaing • The nodal is run using the durcny data If the model being tsed is substantially differenL fro., the other project's formats, early dummy runs will bo used to cor,eaL any date syntax errors - these arc errors resulting from ine0c pct lnput coding as opl.osed to typographlca] errors. A debugging process ensues using the system's specially- de_ignvd detection routines SobL a_I; 2 4 S_llecl: maCal Ch_"L's ou i•mrcetu it n.bu.pling ,after thn model ice. rurcc•.sfully rue I,ir th' fir IA tI11 -' with dummy da La, it still must. bn cl,och: -! fur co-npul J lon.il and conceptual accuracy. • ate only +..ay V,L•: can br i,•a11 1 iL %1 Ly achieved is to rcvlcu oath lino of out 1.•�r au,l m,L�• nu ra• tit.. ao r calculations are what would be ohtntned by parallel manual derivation. Tnis process is necessary to catch conceptual • flaws in the program which the machine, In its complete ignorance, is not aware are occurring (for example, acci- dentally adding the same line twice) Appropriate programming changes are made ds the errors are detected in teas debugging phase. From this, a correct dummy run is obLained. Task 2 5: First Run with Live Data This bask involves performing I Complete run of the model using real data Often, some residual bugs in Lite program resulting from the large quantity of real data input (syntax errors) will occur aId need to be sor -ed out. A parallel purpose is to test the accuracy of the underlying ecouomic/ fiscal assumptions by using this run to project current. City budget from, say, 1976 It is li'rel; Lhat discrepancies in projection vs. actual will require some refinvrivnt or the economic /fiscal assumptions underlying tome or the line items Upon successful completion of this run amt calibraLion wiLh the current budget, the various input ducumentation t.; updated and now serves as Lho base run against ohich to compare others. llotc that all these ilomn will oecu• within IIW cnntexl_ or adnptian the model to each city: thr. 1. 1 IL a lrl exi I:., it works, and it has beet, ;;urceasfully api,l v,1 to of h�•t tisc•Il Impact projects. 61 • - id - hubLask 2 5 1: physical In rt tnto michina am'. Cotrectiou This is the last time .1 maSsIv, iniut Cilo has to lie placed into storage from scratch The same input and editing pro- cedures discussed in Task 2 .4.1 are used hero After this file is determined to be correct, future runs are usually made by simple editing and modification procedures to this basic file of real data Subtask 2 5.2: Running and Delia chi u Syntae errors arising from the input of the wa:clve compute input file can occur and may need to be remo.ed by a d, bugging " process that will probably involve running the model three or four tires more until a clean inn is obLaine,l. Subtask 2 5.2(a) Data Consistency In order to insure internal consistrnicy and rrolovancy of the various elements of input data, the consultant will pr,sont to file City for review and sign -off as pact of tho asvitmpti oils d ,,cument a description of the variables and their interrela- tionships The model will be internally conrslnteut and the consultant is responsible for accomplishment of this consis- �- tenc; IluUta zl: 2. 5 l: Refining Assumptions Any discrepancies in line items projectc4 from the one year earlier base as compared with the actual cdri.^nt City budget would indicate poor simulation of reality Assumption refine- ment may bn iie_cessary, followed by editinj the input rile and running again. This process cuntinu ^s Litt it on ncc••ptable level or accuracy is achirvrii Subtask 2 5 4: Vocllm.^.tiLtlP LIw Firs! l'u•t 1 This involves re- editiu7 the d,ita as:%,nph fat, dn.•nmcnt and the annotnt -d computo input file to reflect any Cnial changes uituln in the course of obtainiliq / rat valid inn 7hnno ediled documents then serve as till !e Lt tonee point against whxch all changes made in future runs can be measured 0 'fast. 2,6: 'twelve Buns and Anrlvsis of reuul'ti At this point, the model has been successtully adapted and made operational using c data base reflecting the City's situation and needs The malting of numerous runs after this point, by varying assumptions and parameters, is straightforw.rd nasically, the process consists of deciding which variables to change, coding the revised lines and the" editing the data in Lho conpute file (already stored in permrnent memory in the machine) and re- running the mo•9ol In simple applications, a new run cen be produced in a natter of hours; 1110ro complicated runs may require more extensive development of new input data prior to insertion into the machine For ewmpl,•, this would • be the case when testing the fiscal xmpa�t of a now dcvclop•net.L strategy, which is greatly different from the three initiel alternatives, where new acreage "'ZO -offs of rich land use might he necessary. In contrast, the fiscal impact at changing park standards from 1 acre pot 1,000 people to 1 acre per 786 peo;lo could be tested in a matter of minutes and genetaLC all new data on park sLaging, operating and maintenance Cost!„ Liming of needed bond proceeds and Lax raLC imp,, t • 63 The. initial suggestion is to provide for twelve runs. tie are IDallowirg fur three basic alternative development strategies (these can typically handle 1,600 or more data changes) and four runs each portraying variations in service standards, unit costs, revenues yields per acre, etc. (typically 5 -100 data changes per ru-t, Ile believe this combination will satisfactorily answer most Lity's analysis needs - for example, it will allow comparison among the three alternative growth scenarios; all at four parallel levels of assumed service standards, unit costs, revenues, and /or per acre yield factorli. Alternative combinations could, of course, be visualized. Thu chosen set of twelve options will be agreed upon during the first phases of Task 1 and 2 Two aspects of completing the twelve rnns need highli<)hting Each new run could be acecmpanied by: P Docturentation spelling out Lite precise data variations fr -m a base run o flanual iuspectlon Of the ontput an<t atulysis aml inter- pretation of the results 'rite t- onsultanl team mcmbt.rj tc•- pnusibl • for tit, nU r•rl total tun Of mOdol output will meet With cll•.r� st rfc to ir�u r results and discuss tlrrtr policy utd ptugr.rn urpiienttons Snrttrisin,t rrsul Ls can, 1-1 (,let, br gtnor.trrd frr,rt the tod,l: fat t•x,tmple, vt the Irvine study, it was found thIL thu g n.wLIt ra't•, +.:r rr, 611 was not the primary determinant of public Service costs, but that the mix and spatial distribution of growth were impartonL • factors in the fiscal impact of development options Special emphasis thus will lie given to rpecifying those factors which are causing the significant impacts on public finances. Based on Lhe results of this analysis, it may be Desirable to use the model for additional runs to test various resulting hypotheses as to those types of. behavior, by the various factors, may - produce more optimal fiscal results Task 2 7: Final Documentation and Training in Flodcl Ifsagc The final stages of the process of covplotin7 tite project ,uid Lurning the model over to direct client usage include the preparation of an appropriate operations manual, Lbo conduct of training in model use, and final documentlllon of basic data and input assumptions. Subta -k 2 7.1: Cditina I1,Inual A model operations manual currently exists. It will be necessary to edit and revise this manual to ref ieoL tl,c specific adaptations of the model for each City IIOSL of thoso chan.le -3 will reflect modifications of tho compulo fiIt, m l to ac,-omm,alate the specific datu categoricr, of the clv_o,t CnPies of thu revised manual will be given Lo th•• Lity, an-1 will b• u•,ed in Lhe train.ng session: fot local stiff • �J h . 1; _ bubtask 2 7 2: Tiainintl Sess,c•a • A three day training sossiun 'till be held in Lho City to Lrain up tj six staff members, or other dusisnated persons, on how to operate the model The training sciaion consists of learning how the model works conceptually, hot to undertake the actual operaticns, and how to edit and othcnn�a modify input. so as to generate new model runs !tore extensive training in learning to basically reprogram the model from sc,atclt (i e , develop new types of output tables and new rodcl L•tructures) may be of evcatual use to one or Lwo people on the stiif oho will assume prime responsibility for maintenance and - Ipd..Lc of the mociol, but is no_ usually incluced .n the initial proicrl costs lxperlence shaws that non- computer trained staff have learned 0 t.• operate the model with a two Lo three day trai•tin•1 •cssinn. • IAbl; 3: FINA REPORT AW PRLSUNTATION A I1nai, edited report will bu prepared Lhat conbinos tLo major written work from earlier phases into it single•, cohesive c.hole. The final report will include: • Fiscal impact analysis of al!craaLtvr dcvclup ^i�nt scenarios, Polley options, ..nd ;or\ tre sl uul.lyd assumptloas (i c., a pfesnrILatunt nntl .m ties n. or the nine r••na undertakca Lo Lt ;t c , l e h r.••u alternatives o Lucumentation oC rt•lh•rinl a,•t .,, I input ruI economic assumpl ions usrd o Analysis of au,:rliary ccono:•t.ct• In mrial Is .a •;. 6� - +{ - Separate from the report still be% • Operator's Manual for using fiscal vcpact model; s Copies of computer model input data, and programs, on appropriate computer storage media. • Copies of a complete set of computer output tables, all tables for each of the twelve runs Ile usually budget for at least one formal final presentation of the project's findings to a public body and we suggost Lhis presentation be made shortly after the final report is rcco,ved and reviewed by the Ctty l!J 0 • l J •Mid products to be Pt�•luced The following lists the end proclucic thin will be produced by the study 0 o A series of porkinj Papers ato tlnno (in xeror form) that will be seat to the City at appropriate phases in the study process; (seo detailed Tar): statements earlier) . These include, but are not limited to: Subtask 1 4: Finali-vd 14ork Plan 2.1.1: Conceptual Approach to riscal Imlact Analysis 2 1. 2: Initial Specification of 140de1 ptRnut 2 1.4: Data Spc•cificaLion and Collection Plan nraft versions of final reports will be circulaLed at appropriate review times. o Final Report (50 lloun,l printed rnpu•s, with graphics) COnter,L oC thcs report wure discussed earlier under Task 3 e Operator's Manual (10 bound copje! ;) . o Coaputcrized data base; and P:•Port Ltjnu,- File: needed to operate the ccw,xltorir,`d Ci >c,t] impact model in the Cutuce. t;tI t b, q(veu to 111 l• on appropriate computer ntdia (c g., Lapc cards). MIS gM PART II: Rol.li or in GKL sT:,l r I.N11 0 IIKR COMMILTid1TS • MKGK will undertake the following roles fn completing the typical project: e Lead responsibility in conccptual dcnian of fiscal impact analysis approach and plan for collection /development of raw input data. *IKGK will evaluate City's fiscal impact needs, data resources and proposed develop- ment scenarios in early larking papois and prepare a conceptual design of the Inouc•l adaptations (c g., calculat Lon metho4olugres, fornats), and a raw input data collection/ development plan that specirles tho exact format and type of each Piece of required data, and who is respc..siblc 'or its collection *Coordination and review of d,ta collucticu/ development efforts; the o t- al work to be shared by consultant and local staff 40 e Total caecution of all rcquis,d conpulor model morliflcati.ons e Total cxec.ILion of Inochanionl input of tabulated data sets into rnnrrter r.•,nlol for each run: cxccut on of cash run; and analysis and write -up of resultant output, findings and recommendations e Coordination and final revu,w cd >_t unl of deeameIItnLlUn efforts for it inpd d.,t ,I and au:.mnptcon:, plan tnt cl r^�pnu (41lw Ly. for dou,mc„I uW ovel ,ll n Ilu,In „yi, ,1 apptoach, and uperal a +n o, oo•rnu Lvc i„ (, it snu • 10 q - 16 - • Local staff will also be reggired to play important roles. In speciilc instances they will be responsible for bringing other consultants into the process. Local roles will be in the following areas: o D.scussion and review of conceptual design .tf fiscal impact analyses, including proposed output formats, analyses techniques, data collection plan, and development scenarios • tlajor responsibility for development. of land use and specified physical tacilitl• input schedules for the various dcvelpprent options; collection of raw, locally -based data and cooperation with other consultanta in its development into appro..riate yield (c g., housing unit, population, assessed value) factors for different land use types: socc•ifi- cation of local service standards; unit costs and revenues. e Assistan:e in doc,:moutr.tion of all (11ntn ,nl input ae.sunptions used in the %aricus model runs MKGK's experience strongly suggc%Ls that the role of local staff •ill be a signiflcant factor in generatinq a quality product MKCK will wolf, with a City - appointed local Pro)cct Coordinator who will, in turn, wort: with IIKGK's Pro)e-t Director ., Loam ocet Ill" dnialion of the pro)ect floreover, le 11 St. if 1, Ano..l •d,,: able rn both land use planninq, and the a^neral It ^al e, •r ±-ton; ^ of the Vas ton. Lily del•v tr,•nt:, will b. , •.eel ,•,1 lu ?D I1 _ help collect, rles•clop 1' 1 1:!':" Lie , prescrib,•d input. data Both the 11111 staff anal then • consultant team will need really access Lit, ,d the cooperation of, City Departmentz from which dat- on service standards, unit costs anR tevenues will be required. As mentioned, access to olhvt consultants shoald also be facilitated by the Cit;, eol.ecinlly in determination of capital costs for iteris such as streets, sewer, drainage, and building costs Frnm time to Lime, additional short -term assistance from City stat. teal clerks and plrnning technicians till be needed to ' manipulate rasa data and measurt• land uses, devel,pme,at increments etc , from maps D1 CI"., exi•, t icttco suycles is that a useful quality procluet that mnlluees rcritibl•• 0 analyses requires these local inluto- to concert alt-h Lh- - onsultanl The City can ,nt Lctpatc iLs local regnllC- ments as beinq the equivalent of one person half Lo Luo- thirds time, average, over the life of the project.. Mutual Unders -- standaas Ct is understood that DIKGK will advi:.c• .no a ^slot the City in obt.ainimt the necessary termit it eqn tpm••1l f1r fallow -on use of the model. if durinq a period of one year from tit, date of the .,tart of the eontract, the City ,1, c„d that, the use of its awn separate, on -site te,nnn.,l t•, d- ,trible, then tfh ^K will pap a cost of up to I"" fe•- r.0 Is . Lo ,^intl (es[i ^n led to ho i me"tha fn, , 10 rp• inn h ml r• • r,•. pt tot cr) Tile City will be rest na',iblo tot :�.• cc ! , ment slppiier and will be of $300 nrtnll "s t'- lin eacess The Consultant will ns5tst the Lttr a in n0twi or ttan�LtLtnq the program into antithvr imnua•le to rh,• ful,i.r. .Lt. tacos conmensuWtr• with rho skills and pr1•,- �.tou< t.,•nl r••1 witl, invoked with the fear „1 t.utt, Any future serer, •c•s, iC will be through a .eparate contract needed, The model shall b•_ eapablc not only or mII•; , :I,,.t tatgc qr•..- and be citywide policies but also pen 1, c- sp.•ci'te area.; and be capable of inputing dew',( on smell s, -ale ma )or economic development such as a netlid„• h ,..t 'I " ",..; •,., y a 0 - 19 - PART 1[t: F� •gTrp__��Y�:u Sciii•uur,c At:,, Itol; I,�C ^s TAS(: 1 PROJECT INITIATION 2 1 2 2 2.3 2 , 2 i 2.6 2.2 3 ADAPTATION OF -CRL IMPACT Mom. v CITY AND ANALYSIS OF Dj;Vr fIF- F,ENT /POLICf SCCNAOrCS Detailed Conceptual Mapping Revieo, Approve, Check Conceptual Design Data Collection and Assumption DOctimenia- tioA (Preliminary) Auaptation Of Computcr Programs and /or Genera - ticn of New Ones First Run with Live Data Twelve Runs and Analysis of Results Final Documentation and Try ining in riudel Usage rlNf L RFPoR,r AND PlIUS£NTAT1OAF'. 7,2 t ntho f n I),u o or o3 ^ct Tnitt, Linn 1 I CITY OF kANCHO CDCAMONSA NENORANDUN DATE, September 19, 1979 70, City Council and City Nanagar FROM, .Tack Lan, Director of Community Development SUEJDCT, CONSENT CALENDAR - Agreement - Interim Community Industrial Plan Attached is the proposed Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce pertaining to the preparation of an Interim Community industrial Plan As stated in the Agreement, the Chamber of Commerce shall contribute the em of $43,000 to City for preparation of Plan No financial contribution shall be rogdiied c: that City. RxcommENDATION, It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. It is further recommended that the City Council direct • staff to initiate said Agreement. RoaPAI-tfull�py/s tied, ac OI[s for Community Development JLxSA,cc 0 7_'3 AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT, by and between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "City*) and THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as •Chamber•), provides as followat WHEREAS, City and Chamber dAsire that there be prepared a Community Plan (hereinafter referred to as •Plr i ") for the indus- trial areas as designated on the Interim Land Use Element of the General Plan. WHEREAS, The Chamber has raised the sum of $43,000.00 from contributions by its members and by others and desires to contribute the same to City for the purpose of paying the cost of preparation • of the Cclamunity Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Immediately upon the execution of this Agreement, the Chan "flr shall pay the City the num of $43,000.00. 2. City may use said sum or any portion thereof to pay for the work of developing said Community Plan. 3. All work performed by the consultant selected by the City shall become the property of the City, and the scope of work for the Plan's development shall be determined by the City. 4. Upon completion of the Plan or upon abandonment of the project by the City, any portion of said sum of $43,000.00 not theretofore expanded shall be returned to Chamber. 5. No financial contribution shall be required of the City. 1 -�� • 6. In the event the Comnur -ty Plan cannot be completed for the sum of $43,000.00, no further contribution shall be required of Chamber. 7. The City may abandon the project at any time for any reason. IN WITNESS wHEREOF, the pasties hereto have executed this Agreement this __ day of 1979• ATTEST: • t ctyCer CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- JAMS C. FROST Mayor RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BY: Name President RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BY: Name Secretary -2- CITY OF RANCM4 CUCAMONGA • MLYDRANDIM DATE, September 19, 1979 TO, City Council and City Manager FROM, Jack Lam, Director of Coamuni.y Development SUBJECT, CONSENT CALENDAR - Agreement - Fiscal Impact Modal Attached is the proposed Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce partaininq to the preparation of a citywide Fiscal Impact Modal As stated in the Agreement, the Chamber of Commerce shall contribute the aum of - $61,000 to City for Preparation of Yodel The City's contribution shall be limited to $7,000, to be expended only after Chembar's contribution has been fully expended RECOMMENDATION, It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. It is farther recommended that the City Council direct • staff to initiate said Agreement Rasp ctfal'l1y pubmltted, � C�1III7+ ct fr�/k.f Jack Lam, Oiroc" tbL oL� Community Development • JL,SK,cc AGREEMENT • THIS AGREEMENT, by and between THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as 'City ") and THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (hereinafter referred to as 'Chamber "), provides as follows: WHEREAS, City and Chamber desire that there be prepared a Citywide Fiscal Impact Model; and, WHEREAS, the Chamber has raised the sum of $43,000.00 from contributions by its members and by others and desires to contrib- ute the same to City for the purpose of paying a portion of the cost of preparation of the model. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Immediately upon the execution of the Agreement, the • Chamber shall pay the City the sum of $43,000.06. 2. City may use said sum in combination with the $7,000.00 budgeted by the City :or participation in the model's development to pay for the work of developing a Citywide Fiscal Impact Model. 3. All work performed by the consultant selected by the City shall become the property of the City, and the scope of work for the model's development shall be determined by the City. 4. Upon completion of the fiscal model, or upon abandon- ment of the project by City, any portion oC said sum of $43,000.00 not theretofore expended shall be returned to Chamber. S. The City's financial contribution shall be limited to $7,000.00, to be expended only after Chamber's contrlb•+tion has • been fully expended. • 6. In the event the Fiscal Impact Model cannot be completed for the sums specified herein, no further contribution shall bo re- quired of Chamber. 7. The City may abandon the project at any time for any reason. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties heretu have executed t..is Agreement this _ day of , 1979. • ATTEST: city clerk 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ JAMES C. FROST Mayor RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BY, (Name) President RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BY: (Name) Secretary -2 7i% N EMOAANDUH Datc: ScPtdOber 12, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subjects Annual Cooperat�ktCrant (CDBC) yuading Community Development One, again, is is time tooesecutucity DeQel pmm[ aced document with the San Bernardino County of the three year City - ear tw provision of that This agreement cover. Fiscal hich of this year A P year of to metuce a new cooperation agreement each y County Agrement ezecu[ed by Agremc., for the City the program. This cooperation agrement is routine in nature and indicates basically that the City and County agree to agree the previously emecuted mction o please give nee call. If you wish additional information or mould like to rev ew agrements prior to Council give me c Calendar, for Council action. Request an Agend, date of September 19, 1979, 1 BH /mw' r1 U 7T COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS 1 40 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, of the State of California, herein 4 tailed "County ", and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a city within said S County, herein called "City ", mutually agree as follows: 6 7 1. GFNERAL 8 9 The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 10 93 -383, hereinafter called "Act ") provides that Block Grant funds may be used 11 for essential community development and housing assistance activities. 12 13 County and City mutually desire to qualify County as an "Urban 14 County" under the Act; therefore, County and City hereb/ agree to cooperate is : In undertaking, or assisting in undertaking, essential community development 16 and housing assistance activities, soeciflcally urban renewal and publicly 17 assisted housing. 18 19 2. TERM 20 - 21 The term of this agreement shall be for not less than the period 22 commencing on the effective date specified below and extending through the 23 first program year covered by County's Fiscal Year 1980 -81 application, unless 24 an earlier date of Lamination is fixed by the Department of Housing and Urban 25 Development (hereinafter called "HUD ") pursuant to the Act; said term shall be 26 automatically extended for successive additional one -year periods unless written notice of withdrawal at the end of any such year shall be given in writing by 29 either County or City to the other 6 montt.s before the and of such year 30 3. PREPARATION OF APPLICATION 31 32 County, by and through Its Office of Community Development, subject 33 to approval of County's Board of Supervisors, shall be responsible for 34 preparing and submitting to HUD all necessary applications for a basic grant 75 under the Act This duty shall Include the preparation of a community development plan and program and a housing assistance plan which satisfy the 37 application requirements of the Act and Its Regulations 32 39 4. COMPLIANCE WITH FINAL PROGRAMS AND PLANS 40 41 Both County and City shall comply in all respects with the final community development plan and program and the housing assistance plan which 43 are developed pursuant to the application requirements of the Act and Its 44 Regulations and approved by HUD. 45 46 S. COMPLIANCE WITH ACT AND REGULATIONS 47 48 Both County and City will comply with all applicable requirements of e9 the Act and its Regulations is utilizing basic grant funds under the Act 51 -1- 54 55 56 a .. sm u 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 •23 24 25 26 211• 29 30 31 32 3? 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 4s 44 45 46 47 48 " 49 x,50 '51 55 G. DISPOSITION OF FUNDS County's Board of Supervisors shall determine the final disposition and distribution of all funds received by County unoer the Act and the activities for which such funds shall be used, subject to the provisions of Sections 4 and S of this agreement. 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This agreement shall be effective for all purposes when this agreement and like agreements have been executed by County and City and properly submitted to HUD the grantor by the designated deadline. 8. OTHER AGREEMENTS County and City shall enter Into such further agreement or agree- ments as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this agreement and of the Act This agreement revises and supersedes any prior agreement between County and City. Dated September 1, 1979 "COUNTY" COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO BY. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVED AS rig 'ORM OFFICE OF COUNTY COUNSEL BY: DATED. RECOMMENDED AS TO CONTENT County Administrative Officer DATED: •CITY^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: TITLE: APPROVED AS TO FORM OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY DATED RECOMMENDED AS TO CONTENT City Manager DATED: 1 2 3 4' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 to 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 20 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 SO 51 52 53 54 55 56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TO: City Council & City ilanager FROMt Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP NO. 5194 - ACCEPTANCE OF BONDS AND AGREEMENT The subject Parcel Map was tentatively approved by the City Engineer on July 16, lg79. The land division is located on the south side of Ninth Street wrest of Hellman Avenue consists of 6.2 acres and 8 lots. The conditions of approval required th, development if a new street named "Flower". The developer, Howard Hucks, has submitted bonds for security as follows: Performance Bond (Road) $17,000 Labor & Material (Road] $17,000 The Cuca=nga County Hater District has indicated that they will obtain is necessary improvements at the time of development. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution approving Parcel Map No. 5194 and accept the bonds for Improvements. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd B. Hubbs Cfty Engineer LBH :deb .1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 5194 iN THE CITY a1F RAACHO CUCAMONGA ..... uwr m.a . ernca. r w ro., c.. as you .o, auaa.w+,w a w+ ro, cuewr ro ^ew aua.wao +a.c+ .. n„ w. Li allOOnD upq.t e4 MCC .t M iuni aacoao• OI YV O[1 W.NC td..,v CM_pa.ww /1. V.L IaN "'^ �' NINTH ,cam^ STRL'ET rs� — �� I pWp 'W W • a •� W 1 7ly Y �T'��• J smarm - —i.:: •••••�f EIGHTH STREET J L J' 1�3 11 • • O RESOLUTION NO. 79 -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FARM. MAP NUMBER 5194 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5194) WHFREAS, tentative parcel map number 5194, submitted by .Invnrd Necks and consisting 8 parcels, located on the south side of 4th eict of Vineyard being a division of Lot 10 of Lot 10 of Cucamonga Vineyard Tract was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Ran:ho Cu. amonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 5194 1s the final map of the division of land approved a• shown on said tentative parcel map; and, $lHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the fine sup by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the. City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Nap Number 5194 be and the same 1s hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to ,resent same to the County Recorder to be filed for record • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of , 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSEVT: ATTEST: 11 City C1• '-A row- KWA Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TO: City Council 8 Ci j rianager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOND FOR COUNTY MINOR SUBDIVISION N77 -0703 (Northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street) The set aside letter of $26,000 from Douglas Hone was requested by the County of San Bernardino in conjunction with the development of the northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street. The 'letter' was accepted by Council on June 21, 1978. The work required for this corner has been completed in accordance with approved plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: • It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify the Bank of America to rel•ise the $26,000 letter of cred't in favor of Douglas Hone, Kathleen Hone and Douglas Gorgen. Respectfully submitted, .. Lloyd B Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb 41 o BANKOFAMERICA 0 W A&eYA BRANCH Juno 9, 1979 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. This will serve as notice and agreement that Dank of America "T&SA 8700 !beeline, Alta loon, a financial institution subject to reg- ulation by the State or Federal Government, holds on deposit the necessary mount of $26,000.00, pledging these funds .o the City& of Rancho Cucamonga for payment of labor and materials on a project of Rancho Cucamonga known as Minor Subdivision Ho. 77 -0703, Ccunty of San Rornardino, State of California, according to that agreement dated , batwL,bn City of Rancho Cucamonga and Rnners as above stated, The Twenty six thousand and no/loo ($26,o0o.00) wil_ be disbursed upon authorization and direction of a duly authorized representative Of the City of Hancho Cucamonga. This agreement shall expire either upon disbursement to the City or upon acceptance by the City of that portion of the aformaationed work scoured by We instrument. Very truly yours, -1(� F. Hentzschol 'a- ,ru.� / \s7'a�_rocaelL apl rwc huger Data �4 /J ; .C� hp L/ 07 Accepted: / City Council, City of Rancho Cucamonga Date [/x� BAHa OFAAEFCAMTOUe :Aml voilv�#UASr . 6700 B.if: 94 . A.ra&eWCA4WOAM91 /01 al --IN r • /. LAND DIVISION APPLICATION J� OY APPLICANT: (Office Use Only) �asa Doubins K. Hone phone 714)989 -1767 Rnncho Cucamonga. Ca L.D. N0. Address 7737 Hellman Avenue. ZQIE LEGAL Om*R 0r RECORD: L. 1104E AND C. DOUGLAS ,33tf347 IPSO Iitls. Naaa DOUGLAS K. 1104L. KATIILEEN Phona_.szma- as -Ah2� EE RECEIPT 40 /'S•/R ADO /..«� - a � 5 `C / 9 � � r V y:, ,ee. Z • <e.e1F P3 /95.32 e. 4 6•J � 1 � CfSF4 � I I _- HQR�H Map Scala OY APPLICANT: (Office Use Only) �asa Doubins K. Hone phone 714)989 -1767 Rnncho Cucamonga. Ca L.D. N0. Address 7737 Hellman Avenue. ZQIE LEGAL Om*R 0r RECORD: L. 1104E AND C. DOUGLAS ,33tf347 IPSO Iitls. Naaa DOUGLAS K. 1104L. KATIILEEN Phona_.szma- as -Ah2� EE RECEIPT 40 /'S•/R ADO /..«� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TO: City Countil S City Manager FR(XI: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOND FOR COUNTY MINOR SUBDIVISION 77 -0559 (Southeast corner of Base Line and Archibald) A set aside letter of $8,200 was requested by the County of San Bernardino as a condition of approval of the land split located on the southeast corner of Base Line and Archibald. The "letter' was for work to be Completed on Base Line in accordance with development of the corner. The "letter" is unnecessary in that a replacement bond from Diversified Investment Company was accepted by Council on Parcel Map 4251. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clerk to notify Bank of America to release the < t aside letter of $8,200 in the name of Douglas Hone due to the replacement by bonds from Diversified Investment. Respectfully )ubmitted, Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb I al BANKOFAMERICA 0 February 28, 1978 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho CucamongL, Calif. Tie will serve as notice and agreement that Hank of America I:T:Si 8703 Basolinu, Alta 1ma a financial instituti.n subject to rcg- ulatlons by the State or Fed•aral Goverment, holdo on dc,ouit the necessary amount of $8,200.03, pledg!nG the-:e funds :o the -ity of Rancho Cucamonga for payment of labor and materials on a project of S E C Development known as Minor Subdivision Xo. 77- 05559, County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to that agreement • dated , between City of Rancho Cucamonga and uvnera as above stated. The Eight Thaueand Two Hundred and no/100 ($0,200.00) will be dis- bursed upon authorization and direction of a duly authorized represent- ative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This agreement shall mcpire either upon disbursement to the City or upon acceptance by the City of that portion of the aforementioned work secured by this instrument. Very truly yours, F. Hentzschol Hraager This agreemout approvedt ACCEP=t -Gnw- �' J � I� I I w 1 � ` t I - � I � I e T b �r fi Elks, r— t Inn 4h j F y � f� I 9J L M. c i jjz;3:i ! 0 � I _ w T CD 44 w r• = V ll\ if y � f� I 9J L M. c i jjz;3:i ! 0 � I _ w T CD 44 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TOt City Council S City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF INTENT TO VACATE A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET - TRACT 9444 The attached Resolution of Intent is the first phase of abandonment of a portion of Banyan Street from Amethyst to 300 feet easterly. The area to be abandoned is being repla,ed by relocation of Banyan through the tract development of Tract No 9444 (see attached sketch). The County Transporation Department had dealt with the developer, Mark IiI _ Homes, Inc., In preparing documents and maps for this abandonment and re- location. Due to the change from County to City and the moratorium, the project .a d- layed. We have been requested by Mar4 III Homes, Inc. to proceed with the steps necessary to bring the map to a point of recordation RECOMMLT:44TI011: It 1s recommended that the City Council approved the attached Resolution of Intention to vacate Banyan Street and set the public hearing for October 3, 1979 Respectfully submitted, ��0 B. ubb� City Engineer V • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -75 A RESOLUTION OF TILE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS SHOW ON HAP NO V -001 PILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION It Tiat the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, at seq of the St -eets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941 IEu IO4 2: That the City Council hereby declares Its intention to vacate a portion of Banyan Street a City street, as shown on Nap No V -003 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 3rd day of October, 1979, at 7:00 p o , in the Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpose room, located at 7105 Carnelian, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its deterring whether said City street Is necessary for present or prospective street purposes SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to sted conspicuously along the lino of the street or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of .+hich shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not lees than one Inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET " SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, If any, for existing utilities or record SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall cause this resolution to be published once in a newspaper published in the City 10 days before the date set for the hearing SECTION 7: The City Clerk Shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in full furce PASSED, APPROVED, ind ADOPTED this _day of , 1979. AYES: Is NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mayor City Clark q7 EXHIBIT "A" s LLGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET That certain portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 27, Township 1 North, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian, Records of Government Surveys in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL i thetcuprof TractB2051,r recorded2inOBooke22wofeMaps. Page 36,iRecordsn of said County. EXCEING THEREFORE that described line: BeginningoatianPoint QonatherSouth line fofisaid9 Banyan Street, said point being North 890 44' 00" East, a distance of 567 80 feet from t�e east line of kethyst Street (66.00 feet wide); thence North 0 28' 32" Nest to the Point of Terminus. • PARCEL 2 That portion of Banyan Street being a strip of land 9.00 feet in width as conveyed to said County by deed recorded Septe,nber 22, 1950 in Book 264% Page 412, Official Records of said County. 0 (3 0 I le �1 W W � j F l i 1 a - S s r. - W T I .e V L — •1 I - I- ENTNFIVE FRACT NO 9444 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINOf'fS .fir � I I - q fMl W •M4 i, STATE OF CALIFORNIA L) ^` I rnr•.w< '• : Inr • r<mrY• u rnsrYr u aJf:� r rf:sd n, ra ✓ <.+rn'. nr: s WIr...Ity � / � I T•/ �i ur . 1• �i✓ /� . I .nfll w• 10 ��/ , -� I fw 4.Yr.r. n it f...•�.•++�In. • 9 II I~ r..�PS.. «... f..+•r 3 '�4P YY•i fn••Yf r' •rIN �' �Ih �!r mltlY fw/ lI; iMI•r . rlues.,fca MPM �W Y••w fr A+•fPa•O 1� fuJIUVNI w Ir, r e. .�II.aM`o� wc. + ? i r '�; Q.1 • raw . YYYLAR' YAA CTil-- .r...... t«f. 4IN • a`uiu •4a • _._UXL ; YPfr NYLyr I — CIS- -+ •'� ...•.i- rr•n.P. i � � �_tli .'n' I IIf � t � 4pIY •4V WU �i �1 W W � j F l i 1 a - S s r. - W T I .e V L — •1 I .A. ' •r / V 1• 1 W ti I .fir � I I - q fMl W •M4 ,� L) ^` I rnr•.w< � / � I T•/ �i ur . 1• �i✓ /� . I .nfll w• 10 ��/ , -� I fw 4.Yr.r. n 3 • 9 II I~ y- • Il• [ • - � MPM �W Y••w fr A+•fPa•O 1� fuJIUVNI 41 \ I 1 • /J• ; YPfr I — CIS- -+ •'� ...•.i- rr•n.P. � �i 1' .A. ' •r / V 1• 1 �Yrr1 "• ^15� u fW �l r FU �� L) •� �1��1`t'�•Ir; � . 1• 5b a u e � r m TRACT 9444 N 20 /Z v }i} V � y SAWAM sr :-Be fLr.r r'Ps�- 7 I I _ PORTION TO BE ABANDONS 8 b Gd r J ♦ lI lT /6 A 18977 sr V,?3j sa -4.f .1 , 16. 15 16 „ 0.&0 1 I 5/ 30 mil, I fi 1 II •• ■ 31 ro o 4 w • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONfA MEMORANDUM Date: September 19, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lao, Director of Community Development Subject: ZONE CHANCE W. 79 -06 - WESTHAY INVESINZNIS - A request to change the zoning from M -R to M -1 for property located an the south aide of 8th Street between Helicon and Arehlbcld Avenues Second Reading - of Ordinance. Second reading of this Ordinance has been withheld until the recordation of use restrictions for the subject site The restrictions have been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and should be recorded prior to this meeting. A copy of the recorded document will be submitted to the Department of Comunity Development prior to second reading and made available to the City Council. • Respectfully a bmit[ed, JACK I.A. Director of Cmm:nity Development JL:m } } ORDI:W:CE NO. 80 AN ORDIYAHCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL nF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 209 - 171 -07 AND 209 - 171 -20 FROM M -R TO M -1 FOR 18.75 ACRE.° •LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 87H STREET BETWEEN HELLMAN r AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE I The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain Ias fnllwst SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines C the following: A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the retuning of the property therinifter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered Said recommendation B That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein SECTION 2: The following described real Property to hereby rezoned in the manner stated and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly N -R (manufacturing research) to M -1 (light industrial) Said property is located on the south side of 8th Street between HoLlwn Avenua and Archibald Avenue known as Assessor's Parcel Noe 209 - 171 -07 and 209 - 171 -20. SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk Shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the name to be published within fifteen (15) dava after its passage, at (cast once in The Datly Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED title dam of August, 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSLVT: L ATTEST- Mayor ? AN ORDINANCE OF Tiiz'67W counif. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE .� No. 70 CREATING AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY . PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE To THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califo is does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Ordlaanca No. 70 shall be am o read as Ea11Gwa: Section 8: Deslamatlon of Landmarks. The Historic Preservation ;omaission, pursuont to the procedures sat forth herein, may recommend to the City Council the designation of a "Landmark" or "Point of Historic Interest" for an individual structure or other feature, or group of structures an a sinble lot or alto, or a site having special aesthetic, cultural, architectural, or engineering interest or value of an historical nature. (a) Each such designation shall lnclt:de a description of the characteristics of the landmark or point of historic Interest which Justify the designation and consequent benefits to the public which will be derived from its preservation. Thera shall be a description of the particular features that should be preserved, and tha legal description of the landmark site or point of historic interest. • may at any time recommend to the City Council Historic Preservation =ending orreseo®dingo of a Landmark or Point of Historic Interest designation pursuant to the mama procedures set forth in this Ordinance for original designation. Historic Interest" will follow the subsequently outlined designation of "Point of o[ ordinance pertinent to Landmarks designation, P procedures of thin pint designation Is merely recognition for historical se Rand Is: Interest" purposes to protective or restrictive provisions applicable to m Lanaarksdesignatiom as outlined in subsequent sections of this Ordinance. "Points of Historical Interest" will be (2) maintainednforepublic use approv information. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the soma, and the City Clerk shall cause the name to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published In the City of Ontario. California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES: ABSENT: ^� ANT: (_Jl' ORDINANCE 110. 85 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FOR`IIA, DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UNLAWFUL WITH- IN THE LIMITS OF CITY -OWNED OR - OPERATED PARRS OR OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECrION l: Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be un- lawful for any person within the limits of any park or other recre- ation facility owned or operated by the City to: (a) Lead or let loose any animal except: (1) Dogs or ca s on a leash, ' - _ ` which are under the full control of a person. (2) Horses, ponies or the like which are ridden or led on bridle trails or other areas designated for such purpose. _ (b) Possess or consume alcoholic beverages. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the phrase "alcoholic beverages• includes alcohol, spirits, liquor, wine, beer and every liquid or solid containing alcohol, spirits, liquor, wine, or beer, and which contains ono -half (1 /2) of one percent (16) or more by volume of alcohol and which is fit for beverage pur- poses either alone or mixed, diluted. or combined with other substances. (c) Enter or remain between tha hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day ex- cept.pu_z�suant to a- perN�e� shed- bY-tl:e (d) Light or fire except in a stove, fire circle or other place provided or that purpose. (a) Throw, project or propel any object capable of causing+ o pro arty except that baseball, basketball, foot- ball and other games where a ball is used may be played in areas designated for uch pur- poses. .. (f) Park or stand any vehicle in other than a designated parking area except pursuant to a permit issued by the City. (g) Drive any vehicle other than on roads, trails or driveways provided for that purpose except pursuant to a_/m_ %ZZ.dt issued by the City. (h) Drive any vehl`fEif at a speed in excess of g five miles po h or (5 m.p.h.). C for use by children under the age o- f four- teen (14) roars unless under the age of fourteen (14) years. (j) Throw, discard, place or dispose of any gar- bage or refuse upon the ground or in any place other than a garbage can or other re- ceptacle maintained for such purpose (k) Bring garbage or refuse from outside the limits of the park or recreation facility and deposit the same in garbage cans or re- ceptacles. (1) Hold or engage in a musical concert or other musical event without a pernmi(tl issued by the City •� „^ rtY (m) Ply alrplQano�s e/,xcept in areas desig- nated for such purposes. (n) Molest, injure or kill any animal or disturb its habitat. (0) Play any radio, tape recorder or other elec- tronic sound- producing device at such vol- ume as to be audible a, a distance of more than fifty feet (501). SECTION 2: Any person engt •ing in any activity declared un- lawful by sub- sections (b), (j) ana (n) of Section 1 of this ordi- nance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by imprison- • ment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months or fine not exceeding Five Hundred and no /100 Dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 3: Any person violating any of the provisions of sub - sections a , (c), (d), (a), (f), (g), (h), (i), (k), (1), (m) or (o) of Section 1 of this Ordinance, after having been once advised that SLch activity is unlawful, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for not tare than six (6) months or fine not exceeding Five Hundred and no /100 Dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4: The provisions of sub - section (c), (f) and (g) of Sect on o this Ordinance shall not "Fly to City employees who are engaged in the performance of their durtes. SECTION 5: The Community Services Director may adopt rules and regu at ons for the issuance of any permit permitted hereunder. Any such permit shall be issued by the Community Ser,�tces Department. SECTION 6: The Community Services Department, pursuant to rules an3stonrTards adopted by the Community Services Director, may issue permits •u:thorizing exclusive temporary use of specified rec- reational areas for groups desiring to engage in specified recrea- tional activities. SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City • Clerk s alFi 1 attest to the same, and the t. :y Clerk shall cause the same to be published within f f p (15) days after its passage, at least once in The ^ally Re newspaper of general circula- tion, published in the Ciity o rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. • APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: . city Car r r 101 Mayor 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: September 19, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director a Community Development Yubj ecru RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MAMAGIHCMI PIAN As the City Council is aware, the Planning Commission has been developing a Residential Growth Management Plan to manage now residential growth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Planning Commission has, over the past several months, held numerous study sesoloas, workshops, and public hearings considering input and comments on the plan from vart.us groups and Indivi- duals The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 12, 1979, held its final public hearing and recommended adoption of the attached Residential Growth Managment Plan SThe Plan is presented In two parts; an ordinance establishing the Residential Growth Management Plan and a Resolution establishing a Residential Assessment Rating $yet= The thrust of theplan is based upon whether or not a residen- tial project can satisfy the following mandatory criterir. Consistency with the City General Plan Availability of adequate school facilities Availability of adequate sewer and water rapacity The show mandatory criteria must be met prior to the development of any new residential project. In addition to meeting the mandatory criteria, the design and provisions of the project will be rated through the residential assessment system. The rating system evaluates the projects based upon the following five major cuteguries The rating system contains a maximum total Pointe of 93 A project mat attain a rating of at least 70 prior to con- sideration of the project Public Services Design Quality Affordable lousing Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments Orderly Development The attached ordinance and resolution is the culmination of months of work and effort It 1 now brought before the Council for their consideration. 1/v Page 2 Residential Growth Ka agement Plan RMCKI MATTON: The Planning Co®ission recommends adoption of the Rest - dentfal Growth Management Plan as outlined In the attached Ordinance and Resolution. RelspryetcE submitted. mi't'tcd, ,--J lJl L .JACK LAX, Director of Comaunity De%elopment JL:MC := 103 r1 U • • ORDMANCE NO 86 All ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GROWTH IUUTAGENENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEYELOPNENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION I : The City Council hrreby finds and determines the following: a That the Planning Com.ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga - did by its Resolutior No 79.58 following a public hearing held in the time and manner describes by law recommend the establishment of a growth management plan hereinafter described and this City Council has helu a public hearing to the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered said recommendation b That the City Council has reviewed and considered the Growth Management Plan and all testimony and comments pertaining to it and finds the Growth management Plan to be adequate in • scope and content C That the Growth Management Plan will ha�,e no significant environmental .npact as provided in the negative declaration filed herein SECTION 2 PURPOSE AND PRIORITf A. Findings I Unmanaged residential growth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga can overburden elementary, iunior and senior high schools in the community 2 Unmanaged resiceatiat growth c,.n ;train public services and result in the impairment of the health, safety and welfare of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Haphazard and disnrderly arowth patterns adversely affect the City's and public agency's ability to provide adequate public services for all developments a Mininal architectural and site design criteria of residential development can create a 'tract" appearance in the cdmminity Surh an appearance detrimentally affects th, physical character and image of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Further, lack of landscaping and design sensitivity can dirinish the environmental quality and economic well being of the community Ordinance No. 86 -2- Continued unmanaged growth can serioisly Impair the • City's ability to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan and can adversely affect the health and welfare of the Community 0 Purpose A Growth Management Plan is designed to implement certain primary goals, policies a.•i objectives of the General Plan. These goals Constitute •ha purpose of a Growth Management Plan and are as follows 1 To preserve and enhance the physical character of the courvnity a. Lij. awau r t of t 2 Sn.prouxd" Ndegaete-scM6ol facilities for all existing and fu G•re residential development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 3. To help ensw: that adequate levels of public services are provided f,^ existing and future development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4 To ensure that minimum design quality In new developments is provided to enhance the aesthetic, environmental and • economic <l,1 bping o the community S. To encourage use of energy conservation techniques in new residential development. 6 To help maintain and improve levels of City administrative services 1 To encourage orderly development of residences within areas more readily served by public services 8 To encourage the development of master planned projects which prov Ue the service needs of the residents of those 'projects Lt6L,1a1lJ.i 9 To �n�n99�55++•'11``.• a variety of housing types and encourage affordable housing Srnne T"is ordinance shall apply to all residential development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as defined in Section 3 • )d5 ordinance no. tit) SECTION 3 DEFINITIONS • For ourposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated CCiity - City in this ordinance refers specifically to the City of Rancho Cucamonga nnda�tor Criteria - Criteria considered essential for all residential development. Residential Develo nt Pro ect - Any development which will result in the v s ono residential lots or the construction of new residential dwelling units including single family, multi- family, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, master planned developments, modular units, condominium conversions of dwelling units which have not been built prior to the effective date of this ordinance, mobilehome parks, etc., which require review by application of this ordinance Residential Assessment System - The measuring device, provided by Resolution o the City council and adopted concurrently herewith, which is rompcaed of a number of rating criteria used for assigning point ratings to proposed residential projects Threshold Point limit - The minimum -,oer of points a project • is required to receive under the Residential Assessment System in order to receive consideration for approval SECTION 4 EYrMP1 IONS The following projects shall be specifically ex mpt from the provisions of this Ordinance A Single family, duplex and triplex developments involving a total of four (4) units or less provided that any such application on a parcel shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a building permit for the last unit on said parcel 8 Residential land devisions Tm,elving four (4) lots or less provided that any such application on a parcel having the same zoning district shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a building permit for the last unit of the project Subdivisions separating parcels having different zoning districts shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance C Go+e•nment subsidized senior citizen housing projects D. Renewable building permits issued prior to the effective date of this ordinance E. Condominium conversions of dwelling units built prior to the effective date of this ordinance. lab Ordinance No 86 -4- SECTION 5 APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND FEES A. Application An application for a residential project shall be made to the Community Development Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on a form provided by the City. Such application shall contain the following information and be accompanied by the following documents Site Utilization Nap including a Vicinity Nap to show the relationship of the proposed development to adjacent development and surrounding ar-a (small inset map). b Use Layout Ilap showing the location and type of Proposed residential use or uses, the nature and extent of open space, the extent of any other uses Proposed and indication of all adjacent uses 2 Detailed Site Plan to include detailed information specified in forms provided by the Community Development Department 3 Illustrative Site Plan to include proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan 4 Preliminary Architectural Plan showing typicals of all sides of proposed buildings and structures indicating materials to to used, trees, andscaping, and shadows to give elevations graphic dimension 5 Conceptual grading and drainage plan and natural features map showing a general indication of type, extent, and time of grading as per requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance 6 Development Schedule of proposed project including phasing 7 Such other information as may be required by the Community Development Director • B Fees Although no growth management review fees will be +.sessed any residential development project, the normal fees for subdivisions, director reviews, site approvals, appeal:. extensions, etc , shall be assessed as per City Council Resolution No 78 -75 Said fees shall be non- rcrundable • even in the event the threshold point limit i� not met. 07 Ordinance No e6 -5- SECTION 6: MANDATORY CRITERIA Certain residential development criteria are considered essential to ensure General Plan consistency and adequate public services for each residential project In the event services are not available to developers, the builder, building associations and other individuals and groups are encouraged to work with the school dist -mcts and other special districts to solve respective problems to order that services nay be available for development The Director of Community Development shall ;nsure that certain criteria are met prior to final approval of any residential development project subject to the provisions of this ord'nance Such criteria shall be placed as conditions of approval which most be net prior to approval of a final map for a subdivision or prior to issuance of building permits for residential development prrJects other than subdivisions Said criteria shall be met in the following order: A The proposed project most be consisten• with the General Plan. This criteria shall be met prior to meeting criteria B. B. The applicant shall submit to the C.miwnity Development Director written certification frrm all affected elemenatry school districts and th^ Chaffey Joint Union High School District that adequate school facilities or proposed future school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by the proposed project. This certification shall be obtained prior to meeting criteria C. C. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Directcr written certification from the Cucamonga County Water District that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project Far prof^ -cts using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability including all supportive information shall be obtained SECTION 7 7EVIEN AND PROCES.ING PROCEDPIRES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A. Establ+shaent of a Residential Assessment System. All applications for residential development projects shall be rated by the Co.unity Development Director pursuant to a Residential Assessment System adopted by the City Council Such Residential Assessment System adopted by the Council shall establish five (5) basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub - categories for rating purposes The five (5) basic categories upon which each application will be rated are Public Services, Design Duality, Affordable Housing, Planned Communities, Planned Unit Developments (PUD), and Orderly Development R)g Ordinance No 86 -6- Projects shall be evaluated under the Residential Assessment • System Tri- annually by the Coannity Development Director Application submittal deadline dates and review dates shall be as follows: Review Period 1 - December 1, 1979 - March 31, 1980 pp cat on ing period - November 15, 1979 - December 31, 1979. Review Period 7 - April 1, 1980 - July 31, 1980 Mp cat on fi ing period - April 1, 1980 - April 31, 1980 Review Period 3 - August 1, 1980 - November 31, 1980 p7[ pTicatTo—n— ?TTing period - August 1, 1980 - August 31, 1980 A Threshold Point Limit shall be established by the City Council as part of the Residential Assessment System This Threshold Point Limit shall constitute the minimum number of points a project is required to achieve if it is to be given any further consideration for approval X� In the event school facilities and or water and sewer facilities are not available to meet the mandatory criteria condit Ons, C e 0 ow nq system of priorities s e es tab shed �e • Community Development Director should said facilities become availaaoic 101? s Ordinance No 86 -7- • Within (5) days after the point rat ng determination of the Community Development Director, the Director shall cause a written notice to be mailed (ceit fled) to the applicant stating the Point rating for hi• residential project and whether his application has rereived the required Threshold Point limit for further consieeratlon by the Planning Commission 8 Appeal of Ratings Ratings of applications whr:h require the approval of the Community Development D1re.tor may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any agggriev d person or body, public or private, within fourteen (14) day, aft, the mailing of said written notice The decision of the Planning Commission of any such appeal may be appealed to the City Council by any aggrieved party in the same manner and time limitatiors as are set forth for the filing of an appeal with the Planning Commission. The decision of the City Council shall be final SECTION 8. PLANNING COM9ISSION REVIEW Planning Commission t review eand approval oshall be evaluated nins tejrmstof to environmental review and clearance, subdivision review pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, and residential development project review Pursuant to the Growth Management Plan The Planning Commission shall approve or deny the project after said review. The Planning Comnissir.n shall also hear appeals of point ratings as described in cection 78 SECTION 9. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE No building pewits shall be issued for any residential dwelling unit which is subject to the provisions of this Ordinance without approval as provided herein, provided however, that nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed or intended to abrogate or annul any prior residential develcpment project approval lawfully issued and in effect on the date of the effectiveness of this Ordinance with respect to an already approved building permit, land division or site plan including all residential development projects submitted for plat, rht.K unless time limits of such approvals described above have been exceeded in which case such projects are subject to the provisions of the Growth Nanagement plan SECTIJN 10: TIME LIMITS FOR APPROVAL A. Exniration_of Approval The following provision shall apply to applications for Residential Development Projects except as specifically exempted by Section 4 of this ordiience Residential development projects approved after the effective date of this Ordinance shall expire after twelve (12) months from date of approval. /� Ordinance No 86 -8- G. Extension of Tentative Subdivision Approval A person who has filed a tentative subdivision may request an extension of approval or conditional approval from 'he Planning Commission by written application to the Community Development Department Such extension request appli ation must be filed at least sixty (60) days before the approval or conditional approval is due to expire The application shall contain a statement of the reasons for the extension and a detailed description of the progress made towards meeting all the conditions for final approval If an extension is granted, new conditions may be imposed and existing conditions may be revised by the Planning Commission Any extension of a subdivision shall not exceed a period of eighteen (18) months SECTION 11_ ANNUAL REVIEW AND ExnIRATION This Ordinance shall be revie�ed annually by the City Council and lanning Commission and shall be of no further force or effect after a period of Of (5) years from the date of adoption If this Ord ffect unless periodeo by Ordinance of the City Council SECTION 12: OTHER LAWS, ORDERS AND ORDINANCES Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to the properties and areas affected by this Ordinance, nor shall it be deemed to conflict with any State laws, orders or requirements affecting such properties or areas In the event that a conflict does arise, the more restrictive ordinance shall apply SECTIO:i 13. SEM . tY The it ,lidity of any work, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part or provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other Part of this Ordinance which can be given affect wit Part or parts hout such invalid This Ordinance shall be in full force cnd effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption SECTION la: The Ptayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City clerk Shen- attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be Published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least onre in The D 11. Report, a newspaper of general irculation published in the City of ntar -o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST: ayor CtYCer ' RESOLUTION 79-74 A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS- MENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Ordinance No. 86 - ntitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, establiehiug a Growth Management Plan to Regulate New Residential Development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ", which requires that a Residential Asnessment System tot d:velopment review be established, setting forth five (5) basic oat, cories, each category being assigned a =xi-- number of total poii.ts which shall be used for rating purposes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City has recommended lduov on of a Growth Management Plan to the City Council; and W;:CyrAS, the City Council has considered the purposes of the Crowth Management Plan as set forth to paragraph B of Section 2 of %aid Ordinance and the criteria required to be considered in paragraph i. Section 7 of said Ordinanco Including, but not limited to, Public • icrvires, Design Quality, Affordable Housing, Planned Communities, Planned Unit Developments, and Orderny Development MO;f, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a ge%idential Assessment System is established based upon the following criteria: SErTlnit 1: PUBLIC SERVICES Drainage Facilities The City °agineer shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff A project must have a minimtm of 5 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 pts maximum) I Project drains into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated (5 points) 2 Project build% muter planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which t% a.qo capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (8 points) ) Project prow des gpetiol drainage facilities fir g.. on- site +torn drains, unierground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) co alleviate grading constraints (2 points) 1[Z B. Street Circulation and Improvements The City Engineer shall review each project in terns of • atreot circulation and its ability to handle the traffic ' generated by the project. A project moat receive a minimum of < points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). 1. Project will build or widen a major of eccondary highway (5 points). 2. Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially altor existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (d points`. 3. Project provides street improvements beyo•id project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points) C. Project will build or widen a collector street (2 points) 5. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and - above that required by City standards (2 points). C. Residential Safety and Seeurity The Caamunity Development Director shall review each project for its ability to be adequately sorvod by the San Bernardino • County Sheriffs Department and the foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project incorporates safety and security techniques. A project must receive a minimum of 3 Points in each of the folloving categories in order to receive further consideration (S points maximum) 1 Police Protection (G poi,.ts maslamt) a. Project site abuts existing development over 70% of its perimeter (2 points) a. Project site abuts existing development between 25% and 70% of its perimeter (1 point) e. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points). d. Security devices such as window locks will be installed in each unit (1 point) ' e Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible apace design, lighting placement, etc., to enhance residential security (1 point). 2. Firn Protection (4 points maxlm,m) • a 70% - 80% of the project is within a three minute driving response time of a fire station (< points). 113 b. 70 - 80% of project is bet"on a three and five • minute driving response ties of a fire station (2 points). i +,. o. 70 - 80s of project is between a five and eaves minute driving response time of a fire station x '• (1 point). d. Fire mitigation measures (e.g. fire resistant building i materials, vita design which enhances fire access, etc.) i are lnrorporatM into the design of the project. Points in this category shall be evaluated by the Foothill t Fire District (2 points). (Motes For projects submitted as Master Planned Developments, residential security shall be %valuated for the - '' entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project) D. Parks and Paths The Community Development Director shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and/or private parks and usable open space A project =at receive w minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive curther consideration (6 points maximum) i t 1. Project provides on or oft site public perk improvements • and/or school recreational facilities (1 point). 2. Projoct provides privately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point) 7. Project ronnsres residential areas to usable open space and public and/or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathway% wherever possible U point) r• - i C. Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point). 1 S. Over 501 of project is located within S mile of an existing or future proposed public park site (2 points). 6. Over 50% of project is located between S and 1 mile of an existing or future public park site (1 point) 7. Mr•e than 50% of project is located within roil% of usable public open spree (a g , school facilib Ces)il point). (liote° Fnr projects submitted as Master Plafaed Dave.,Ants provision of parks shall be evaluated for the .,tiro project and the point total shall as applied to fats phase of that project ® M,� E. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center The Community Development Director shall review each project • for its location to existing and future neighborhood co®ereial, shopping canters For the purposes of this section a 'neighborhood commercial shopping crnte" shall swan a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum) 1. More than 501 of project is within 2 mile= =f an aaisling or Planned comnrcial shopping center (3 paints). 2. More than 501 of project is between 2 and 1 miles of an r existing or planned ceammercial shopping center (2 points). 3. Project is more than 3 miles from an existing or planned n commercial shopping cator (1 point) F. Protect Maintenance The Project PcMidea for a )boeowner's Association and /or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site min - tenance (3 points). SECTION 2m DESIGN OUALITy A. Architectural Design 0 The Design Review Committee (consisting of two appointed members Of the Planning Commission and the Director of Ccammunity Develop. ment or his designate), shall review each project for architec- tural design quality as Indicated by the quality of construction and by the architectural elevations of the proposed building, Judged in terns of architecture) 10 Pointe maxisse) style, size and height (up to Criteria The fol. owing criteria represents the general typos of Architec. tural Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in ci fie evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically ewntlanod here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. The api.licant I. encouraged to use creativity in the design of the project I. Provider various visual and tactile textures by using an assortment of building materials to finish surface. 2. Creates variety in design and architecture that creates strong identity. Nixes two story and ono stor,• drillings within a development to achieve a variety of housing mix m and reduce the caoness of the tract i!5 5 b. Varies the types of banding materials within a • project to create dlearslty, yet not creating excessive contrasts. •• ?'.: c. Varies the color and design of housing units with particular attantl,n to common themes without creating A "evasive contrast_ d. Provides special design features such as curvilinear walk*, textured walkways, etc B. Site Orientation and Street Dcaign i7 The Design R. view Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of lot sizes and conflq- orations to accommodate terrain and street design, and also, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of he=* designs and orientations Better site design will ircorporata the utilization of the a= aryl wind for heating and cooling purposes (up to 10 points maximum) Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Site • •' Orientation and Street Design elements the Design Review ' Cmmenttee shall consider in their evaluation. projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and • still be eligible for the maximum number of points. Site Orientation 1. Minimizes crowding and enhances spatial relationships (eq , by avoiding excessively deep and narrow Iota) 2. Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and hovaing layout. 2 Mintuizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites. 4 Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vogetatien. S Designs lots and structures to minimize wise through the uce of set- backs. proper location of air conditioning =its, living areas and the like h 6. Create, visual relief alonq residential streets (eq , varying building setbacks• roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc 1 Street Design ® 1 Tho design of streets and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation ind fire accosn while maintaininq acceptable fire response time. .•. a Past through tra[ ) s discouraged by use of curvi- linear street des�g�i d /or other design techniques. b. avoids short blacks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to col-de -sacs) whenever possible. C. Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy q of residential neighborhoods. d. Parking access is fram local streets rather than secondary or major streets Z. Public transportation is encouraged by the project. a. Locates bus stops as part of the development whs -aver necessary as a result of planned or current but routes. b. Provides bus pullout areas and covered waiting areas for user wherever necossary as a result of planned or current bus routes 1. Varies sidewalk di+ansione and patterns to avoid monotony. 6 Provides handicapped access to the project C. Landscape and Screening Design The Comaaaity Development Director shall review each project for landscape and Screening design Such review will deter- mine compatibility of all trans, shrubs, ground cover, walls and fences, mounding, paths, lighting, etc., with the topo- graphy and site characteristics o: the project (up to 10 points communes). Criteria The following criteria represent the genera! types of Landscape and Screening Design elements the Community Development Director shall consider in his evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maxim, aumbnr oC points 1 landscapin7 materials are utilized to provide home privacy and also screen trash and storage areas .. Tandscaping techniques and Wilding materials are toad to enhance the quality of the site and architecture. ), Project provides interior parkway landscape and irrigation impro aments 6 Plantln) materials blend with and enhance the archi- tactural design of the development. 5 Pence$, hedges, walls, etc , ere compatible with and enhance the architectural design of the development. 6 Trees are used for screening adjacent streets and enhancing site quality 7 Stabilization of /q1 is promoted by landscaping techniques vhtch br�� slope erosion. El b. Windows are placed to allow cooling from prevailing westerly summer breezes (1/2 point). c. 1Yeo planting considers any effects on the use or future installation of residential solar cn3rgy collectors (1/2 point). 2. Units are pre- plumbod for adoption to solar energy heaters (1 point). J. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are incorporated into the architectural design, (e g., reduced consumption shwrcr heads, trotter grade insulations double Pane window, etc.) (I point) 4 Development provides option to homebuyars to purchase solar energy collectors for heating purposes (I point). •r„ .. $ ' . w? 8. Lighting sources are aeveaned to minimize light spill over from one house to its neighbor. 9. Drought rssistmnt plants are utilized. 10. Earthen berms are placed to delineate the use of spaces, Provide privacy, reduce noise, control rind, mitigate flooding, frame view, etc. 11. Grouped puking areas are landscaped to provide shading and virual screening from streets and buildings. .' 12. Apartment/candominitm and condominium conversion landscaping of t1.xs meets or eaeaeds the City standard • �• of 50 trees /gross acre. D. Energy Conservation The Community Development Director shall review each project submitted for provisions of passive and active energy conserva- tion techniques .sad in torms of architectural design, land- seeping, and site orientation (5 points mazlmnm) '• 1. Building orientati. i and landscaping are designed to maxi- mize the use of passive solar heating in winter months and cooling winds in summer months. a. Buildings are situated to maximize passive solar heating in winter months Cog . east -west aligned units, south facing windows, etc.). El b. Windows are placed to allow cooling from prevailing westerly summer breezes (1/2 point). c. 1Yeo planting considers any effects on the use or future installation of residential solar cn3rgy collectors (1/2 point). 2. Units are pre- plumbod for adoption to solar energy heaters (1 point). J. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are incorporated into the architectural design, (e g., reduced consumption shwrcr heads, trotter grade insulations double Pane window, etc.) (I point) 4 Development provides option to homebuyars to purchase solar energy collectors for heating purposes (I point). •r„ .. $ ' . w? SECTION 3. AFFORDABLE )MSING • The Director of Community Development shall review all projects for the provision of adequate housing for all segments of the population in Drier to create diversified neighborhood environments and income groups, aioiding concentrations of any single incomo group in one particular neighborhood Those residential development projects which provide `affordable' housing shall be given additional point consideration as wall as opportunities for density bonuses For purposes of this section, Affordable Housing in defined as, Purer Occupledi Projects which are sponsored through government programs or privately financed through market rate programs loving a Frico range of 3 5 time 80 -120% of the current median family income of San Bernardino County consistent with the City's Housira Assistaoco Plan (HAP) This income figure shall be readjusted annually and is currently $14.800 Renter Occupied, Fair market rent in San Bernardino County as defined by Section 8 of tho Housing and Community Devalopment Act which shall be readjusted periodically and is currently," - s of Bedrooms Detached Scmi- Jetached /Row Walkup Elev (2 -4 stories) 0 - 262 280 1 - 348 216 736 • 2 460 425 377 399 3 512 471 409 - 4 568 525 454 - The above figures include the price of utilities and may be increased by not more than Int tf allowable by the provisions oftth. Bouoing and romuntty Development Act. For Fro'ects whirh do not include utllltle• in the rental rates, the following deductions from the above described fair market rates shall be made. s of Bedrooms Deductions for utilities 0 25 1 30 - 35 1 10 4 45 *Median family Income of Sat Bernardino Cotnty is current as of January, 1979 and is readjusted annually , •-r3,r market rent is current as of april, 1979 and is readjusted periodically Criteria • 1. Affordable housing shall be evaluated using the following criteria, A. Project provides 15% or more affordable housing (6 points and up to `s density bonus) b. Project provides S to 15% affordable housing (0 points and up to 10% density bonus) c Project provides 1 to 5% affordable housing (2 Pointe and up to 5s density bonus). (NOTE, For Projects submitted as Master Planned Developments, Affordable Housing shall be evaluated for the entire project and thapoints shall be applied to each phase of that project This section may not be implemented until the General Plan and 7aninq Ordinance have been amended to alloy for density bonuses). The Cursminity Davelop ant Director shall review each project submitted as a Planned Core=, nity for the degree to which it achieves a variety of housina trues prov "ea public facilities and services, efficient internal circulation and overall integration of residential design factors For purposes of this or finance, n application submitted as a Planned Community must consist of a minimum of�00 acres (up to 6 points maximia) • Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of elements the Comiunity neveloFmont Director shall consider when evaluating Planned Cormvlities ;u h developments day include other criteria not specifically mentioned hero and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. 1 Provides for a variety of Musing types and costs to complement existing Musing in the irewdia[e areal i c . Owner Occupied: single family, multi- family (townhouses, cendomintumslr Rental, apartments duplexes and elderly family 2 Provides for necessary pabllc facilities, o a , sower and water lines. fire facilities, school facilities, etc , to serve the residents of the deve!clxacnt. 3 Provides an efficient internal circulation system designed to maximize safety and minimize eonlestion and monotony, which is integrated with the City's Naatcr Street Plan 4 Cr,-aten various and diverse a.cht•ectural and site design theses throughout the developrent M.evar, not over exagerating any one theme 0 Planned Unit D9yCIOp nts ,PUD) ® Planned unit Develorment9 IPUD'9) which are not a rarr of an adopted Planned Community shall rccntvc I Mint for each S i-re, of planned unit development not to exceed a total Of ) points for the enrlr.. protect 12Z) SECTION 5, ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT The Comuraty Development Director shall reviou all projects for the extent • to Which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing devolopmai,t rather than dap -frog davelopmnnt" Two third[ of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that is contiquou■ with existing development Contiguous development to defined as having no separation by variant, undeveloped land If the prejact is phased, tontiquous development shall be meast red for the entire project (6 point, maxitmm) SM104 i, CUSTOM LOT SUBDIVISIONS Custom nt subdivisions are those which create parcels not subsequently built inert but sold individually or in groups to an individual or builder As suet, certain criteria such as architectural and landscape design cannot be ova uated at the time of subdivision This section will evaluate those factor, arplicable to custom lot subdivision and derive a point rating which would apply to any future residential develope<n,. project of five units or more in the custom lots Applications for diatom lot subdivisions sh411 be rated using the following criteria, A. r.bllc Services 1 Drainage facilities The City Eugineor shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff A project must have a minimum of 5 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maxim n). Project drains into am existing or planned storm Arai[ or street capable of handling the surface water gonerated (5 points) b. Protect builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacit for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of sits which are capable of handllnq the surface water generated by the project (8 points c Project provides special drainaqo facilities (e q , on -site storm drains, underqround facilities and Aratnago facilities maintained by ,•omco.aters) to alleviate gelding eonstrai ms (1 poirts, gtrect circulation and ln,rovenonts The City Enqtneer shall review each project in totms of street circulation and by its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project t project mist receive a minimum of 4 points in this categor• in order to receive further consideration (10 points maxlatm) (2I c. Project connects residential areas to usable *pan space and public and /or private park site$ with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (l point). d. Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point). , e. Over 50% of project is located within 1/2 silo of an existing or future proposed public park site (2 points). a. Project will build o, widen a major or secondary highway (5 points) g. More than 50% of project is located wit do 1/2 mile b. Traffic generated by the proposed project will act substantially alter existing traffic patterns or f4. overload th.e aaistbbg street system (4 points). } c. Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points). i hood commercial shopping centers For the purpose of d. Project will build or widen a collector street (2 ,- points). s. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by the City Standards (2 points). 1. Perks and Paths " The Community Development Director shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and/or private parka and usable open $Paco. A project =at receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum). a. Project provides on or off site public park improve- cents and/or school recreational facilities (1 point). b. Project provides privately own-id and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point) c. Project connects residential areas to usable *pan space and public and /or private park site$ with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (l point). d. Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point). , e. Over 50% of project is located within 1/2 silo of an existing or future proposed public park site (2 points). f. Over SOS of project is located between 1 2 and 1 mile of an existing or future park site (1 point). g. More than 50% of project is located wit do 1/2 mile of usable public open space (a.g , school facilities) (1 point). f4. Neighborhood Commercial Shooping Center The Community Development Director shall review each project for its locatic i to existing and future neighbor- ; ® hood commercial shopping centers For the purpose of this section, a - neighborhood commercial shopping center' shall man a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square fact of gross floor area (1 points maximum) 12 Z- a. More than 501 of project is within 2 miles of an existing or planed commercial shopping center • (3 points). •. �; b. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 1 miles of ' an existing or planned commercial shopping center `• (2 points). C. project is more than 0 miles from an oxisting or planned cosmreial shopping center (1 point) B. Site Orientation and Street Design Z The Design Review Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of lot .�, sizes and configurations to accommodate terrain and street design. and also, variability of ht sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations. Better site design will incorporate tho utilization the aun and wind for heating and cooling Purposes (P to fO points maximum). criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Site orientation and Street Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation. • project my include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. site orientation 1. Minbmizes crowding and enhances spatial relationships (e g., by avoiding extensively deep and narrow lots) ,. 2.. preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing layout. 1. Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting Boor building sites. 6. Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation S. Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks, proper location of air conditioning units, living areas and the like . 6. Creates visual ralief along residential streets (e.g , varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc) Street Design • _ 1 The design of street and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while maintaining acceptable fire response time. X23 a Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvi- linear strest design and other design techniques b Avoids short blocks, dead and and half streets (as opposed to cul-de -sacs) whenever possible. c Street layout and site Oriente ion promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d Parking access is from local streets rather than eernndary or major streets Orderly Development The Community Development Oirnctor shall review all projects_ for the extent to which they tecomplish the orderly and con- tinuous extension of existing development rather than -leap- frog development` Two thirds of a point will be granted for each 101 of the project that is contiguous with existing development Contiguous - development is defined as having no separation by vacant, undeveloped land If the project is phased, contiguous development shall be measured for the entire protect (6 points t imum) • SECTI04 7, THRESHOLD POltrr LIMIT The City Council hereby sots a Threshold Point Limit of 70 points for development pro rots other than custom lot subdivisions, and 11 points for custom lot subdivisions NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS, 1 That the Planning Coomission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereb$$ adopts Resolution 79 -59 recocxnding that the City Council approve and adopt the Resi ntial Assessment System o, the 12th day of September, 1 -79 2 That a Certified copy the Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning ommiscion shall be forwarded to the City APPROVED AlIq ADOPTED THIS 12TH Ok1Y OF SEPMMER. 1979 PlAWRIING :OM?IISSIO(k OF THE CITY OF RAMCHO CIICI WNOA BY, Harman Rempel. ATTEST, Secretary of the /Planninh CoTmiwsion l 2-4 RES7nrar 111A. ASSESSMENT RATING - Sl, tt, . CATEGORY MAX. POINTS PERCENTAGE I PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities 10 (5 pts. min) 10.8% B Street Circulation and Improvements 10 (4 pts. min) 10 8% C. Residential Security 1 Police Protection 4 (3 pts min) 4 32 2 Fire Protection 4 (3 p:s. min) 4.3% D. Parka and Paths 6 (2pts. min) 6.5% E. Commercial Shopping Centers 3 3.2% F. Project Haintemnnce 3 3.2% 60 43 O% It DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design 10 10.8% B. Site Orientation and Street Design 10 10 82 C Landscnpe and Screening Design 10 10 8% D. Energy Conservation 5 5.41 35 37.6% III AFFORDABLE HOUSI6'G 6 6.5% IV PLAWED CO)DRINITICS AND PLA.WEO UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (pl)D) A. Planned Communities 6 3.2% TOTAL: 93 Points THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT: 7/0 Pointe - 41 ' w p 1 25 ■ 11 CITY OF RANCI87 COCANODCA MMORANDIM Data: September 12, 1979 To: City Covpcil and City Manager From: Jack Ism, Director of Community Development Subject: ZONING DLTEIVINATION NO. 79 -06 - Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association - Request for Determinatlon as to whether or not the Peter Popoff Lbangellstic Association use is allowable in the R -1, .ogle family zone ABSTRACT: As the C1t7 Council will recall, this itom was continued from the September 5, 1979 City Council meeting in order that a full Council wuuld be present to review this determination Since that times Barmaklan- Wolff and Associates have submitted a letter with additional inforeatlon regarding the Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association It is attached for your information. Additionally, we have attached the previous Staff Report for your consideration. Our recommendation remains the seems. Respectfully su fitted V `fir .Yj i JACK LAM Director of Community Development JL:BRH:nm Attachmentst Barmaklan -Wolff letter Planning Commission Staff Report dated 9/5/79 I2—W BARMAKIA,N VN+OLFF AND ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTURE & ENVIRONMENTAL DES;GI1 September 6, 1979 11r. Jacx lam, Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning nepartment 9120 gaeeltne Rancho C:camonga, CA. 91701 I1L.,6 :IVE 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 60MMU11ITV DEVELOPMENT DEPT. W 10 1979 AM PM 718,9110111121 1 1314151 G re: Further Information Regarding Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association _ for City Council Appeal of Planning Commission Decision. Dear Jack: Our firm is acting as spokesmen for the Evangelistic Organization of tlr. Popoff because of their relative inexperience In dealing with City Government and its requirements regarding their site use. Evidently, there Is Ault difference of opinion on the City's part, also because of the staff's tri- recomaendatton, the Cocmleslun'e decision and cite Council's appeal. Because of this apparent division of thinking, I would like to offer sore input to hopefully clear up some preconceptions or at least to offer data to make ad objective decision on the part of the Council possible. When ❑r. Popoff anproached our firm, we were aware that Ilia organization offered serviceA Aomewhat unique in eonparieon to typical community reliniouA Services. Recause of this unique Application (i.e. technical commmlcatton And correspondence), we thuught it wise to consult with the Plannlne Department and be open and honest about the Association's functions. If we h.: approached the Planning Department with n typical churh concept AS Soro have Sura,ested, we could probahly N well into the Prolcrt with a nlre rnmer4ton and ,nntrict, but our firm's lrtegrlty and our rappart with Rinchn racdmonRa means too mwth to us, not to Cention the DnsSiblc unable In 4m future if there wis any misunderstanding In regards to the evangelistic function of 4r. Popoff's Assncivtlon. 99 C'STREET SUITE 201 UPLAND CALI FCRNIA 917P6 . 7ELEPHONE: (714) 9e5d661 ANDREW BARMAKIANArcK4ect,AIA/LARRY WOLFF'Architect • 0 'It. Jack Lan Planning Department page 2 September 6. 1979 The question put forth to the Planning Commission (and which they approved), was whether the proposed Evangelistic Center uses were similar to those of a church. I think this question firings up four basic Issues I would like to address and have backed up with some amount of researr! including the Dictionary, Telephone Book and the Ring James Interpretation of the Pew Testament of the Bible. The issues Heat I. Uhat is a church and its related uses? 2. Are these uses compatible with neighboring zones and uses? ). Uhat impact vou!d this project have on the surrounding community end uses? • 6. Would approving this project be setting a negative precedent on fuhtre church or allowable zones uses? ISSpr:l To define 'chnrc" Is very vtbjecttve and at best Individually different. Ti some, church means n shell, a building or a temple. To others, it's a concept, en attitude or a state of mind. Wf95TERS DICTIONARY defines church as 'house of the Lord, belonging to the Lord; a building set apart or consecrated to public worship, especially for Christian worship; public worship, a religious ser,lce... Christians, a group of worshippers, a pnrttculnr sect', etc When a stuJent of Jesus answered a question correctly concerning Jesus's teachtng, he replied that his correct understanding would bull.' his 'church'. In other words, "correct thlnkiig' was Jesus's "church-. The Popoff organlzntlon's mstn thrust is in reaching a spreading the teachings of Jesus as written in the New Testament n' the Bible. I Z8' Mr. Jack Lam Planning Department page 3 September 6, 1979 Originally, evangelistic teaching was accomplished by the early students or disciples and patriarchs by traveling from town to town and preaching. Rural America hid traveling ministers or preachers who would meet at a comm,nity house or church to give their sermon. Mhen the founder of Chrlstlendom taught, he would teach from a hill or platfo" or from a boat in a lake, wherever the acoustics %ould be - appropriate. In today's age of computer technology, mass communication through radio. television and tolephune, the conventional 'Drencher', although still traveling, has made use of this advanced technology In communLcattng as Jesus probably would have if he had had the equlpmnt. Because the Popoff Evangelistic Association makes use of computer typewriters to answer and transmit letters to those desirous of needed answers and help, more quickly over conventional typewritten or handwritten replies, should not Imply that his work is any less n•nninRful in comunicnting ideals, or more of an 'office use'. Using video tape machine[ to transmit their local services to other areas of the country only enhances thctr local effort and makes them we, valid In an evangeltstic sense. Most churel.es are flattered It their services can have a further outreach. To have attendants answering planes cn - crisis- hot lines to local residents doesp't make their organization less, but more community oriented to putting in to practice Jesus's professed teachinq, of - loving your neighbor as yourself -. Dally ou-the- grounds counseling also rakes - church ideals- more practical. There is not much of an argument against the thought that those people do form a church and perform . church work- In the literal definition. This leads to the potentially bigger Issues of compatablllty with surrounding tones snd uses. ISSUE:2 On the west is a high density (2- story) apartment complex; on the east is another church complex (we designed) sLth the potentidl for I Z� ll E 4r. Jack Lam Planning Department page 4 September 6, 1979 a 96 children day care facl'tty. 600 -IDOG worshippers, a Christian education complex and whatever other functions could happen on the large site. These people feel it is right to make full "a of their church buildings 7 days a week. On the south is 19th Street, a potentially busy thoroughfate with a housing development backing up to Its south side. Lastly, to the north 1s a presently proposed state freeway. This project it. no vay can infringe upon or be not compatible with their present total of 5 or 6 workers and their neighbors. With the optimistic outlook of increasing tnetr scope over the next 10 years and drawing the needs of the community into their religious outlook, they at best feel 40 employees Would be adequate. Can a daily influx of 40 card be compared with 96 on the east and at least that many on the West? Can a one and two story complex of ultimately a 10,000 s.f. -foot print' spread out ever 7 acres (305,000 s.f. -: /)0th) be compared with a ouch more dense project of apartments on the vest and an allowed 36 foot high 0 story) complex of buildings on the east, be considered incompatible? • ISSUC:3 Other than drawing 10 -40 people from the community to carry on their dally ministry and having a higher than normal mall and telephone use, there Berta Lnly Isn't any detrimental community or environmental impact that this small group of people can make on its neighbors or the city 1. general. In looking through the phone book, (copies attached), several churches have hot lines or dial -a- prayer services. Sow have counseling and one has a radio broadcast. Most, if net all, are located in at close to residential com>vntties. The church with the radio broadcast tape heir services live In the sanctuary (as Mr. Popoff intends to do ...h video equipment). The church has a 39010 s.f. * office spate and publishes their own church magazine. (Source: Mrs. Davis - Office Manager of Claremont United Church of Christ Congregational - Station KLLT 1220). These other communities (Upland, Claremont, Chino, Pomo.rn) seem to havu no compatibility problems with these churches and their uses. lJ 130 0 Hr. Jack Las Planning Department page 5 Sep-.ember 6, 1979 ISSUE + Would the city be setting , bad precedent by approving thin pro Je,:c' In other cords, by appro ing Hr. Popoff's unique church activity be allow;ng other allowub a •ues in certain areas and tones to gc to extremes whirl, would not be :omlattble with surrounding areas? That seems to be rather a 'mute' poiut considering where we are on this particular matter Rnnrho Cue,morga has an appropriate screening process (more char moat r.ttias) Wets by a project is reviewed by a capahle staff and director, approied by a comisslon and possibly challenged by c council with the ubtLe interests in mind. Precedent or not, all proJec_s are still revleved with the city's future very much In sight. That this project is unique, the *a is no queatlon, that it is a church again can be demo:strated by the result of its activity; that it is compatible with its nolphbors can be also predicted, if detrimental to the conmunity, no more than son) other churches already in existence with slTllar uses and activitie . 0 The decision to allow -It Popof' and his organization to make use of his property for their ministry is iw In the hands of the City Council. Hopefully, the previous arguments prese ^ted shed some light on his intent and the Impact it will hive to Rancho Cucamonga. This office feels It is not a b a or detrimental project far the proposed site and is very much in line with the concept of church activity. Thank you and please convey theist points to the City Councilmen. Sincerely, UALC LANG , ✓ ✓� Architect DL:g J cc: Peter Popoff 131 L •af As Shn.Y« I+ Thq While InforY'nlron Pogq .(Cont'd) Churches- St•ptist Southern r V'S Vr.Ijj• t.:.. st 1 ,Yr11rY C411 +i,+vrrtli w.xrr S'uIe �iL[YLY III STREET W n ST 011101' .• 31 I ' .+PIES C R' J1 nl. PAS' tjbN1YI I r vn+ I w+n l«1V mAYI "'r- i•• °YYif nlfnNnsrclauucrnclNaeu— 1n NN I - •.,PAT TY!•.•{`%D F°tCS 1l11m I - ILYJ> q vLPi Hirai W Y li! r •r 5[+••5 Mr.I ArY +gtrY ria1N• 4n 4 :M LPt{ t "BRIE •_ •, pY'i Y ferry Ur'Ar. Y rtl '+Yw fltSrIC.,.C.le.I.,rVltfLC--- i {'r.a< +rf( ae .Yn[ nYll+ ti UbPU baglV Il fS N.{ 6 P %% C 1 SC).r SY SCnAC J �o MS r�Hr S C1A1 H TSAIN'•ti• S r•1 - ' •SYI•) I 41JC$i °v USE All $LNVICF$ ,••\ a•.r.{ YFX.r19. Or•Ifrfi Nl Cllt >v r> ..etrs sItt'. ca ( YI +v3 Ylrrnu or .wn fll MN u4Wis HfiTrfE•INPAtJllit <ML'S[N OF tub le Will I ,.L E EEa-Y :IFT[ ' •nw +YawA1w" ( u)flls . yHiai CUIq .11 4[m4M K)(hl e•Jgm,ry en IY3VPI D'My f ;Iftefal a ... u,R•.a F .1a,iv uwY rOgL SAIII 4 9.19. S C'JIY llUlp IDi15T (NL1LN- { I uri.rlir Y+•nrily •lV •r 1 )+. +1. r+LLq M 11. Itr• ry+ I,wt {yafY4+ SNIJu Y� ( Iht N+ru.++1 fN )Ils Fnsw Mf.MfWYL4YY I YIY,++n e.4 tLV (131 `uw•rf'iriY+Y fvn t>YL ,� +.• rw._.... foals ' chvcfis 181 lurches - Brethren Churches - Catholic, Roman — (Cont'd) — (Cont'd) - '.nUENINCNRISrcYYRCNYrL1N> S In TNnrs CSTNOtIC cnmcx- Ro@fRf W x[vrr ryAV I.$.. vtNUUY F4TMtR PETER IREYYAN PASTOR !'r.+. Y t� hi Ywla /u n V1S1tf fH) H 1r Cdr Ut)i fYiW/i • IO1111133AV rnav CIA& VN/IV s:($s/{SSSt, iYHP• 0,31 43 Sli\IC[f (>VIIS:C^) InC3[ i3t YSSSIt 1,31 nw a ax' Yq to YlAI) lIN N 11,rr.r Nr of }Hl inn'�xlr�i:NY (µ,LL Sr CtORCt [ITNOIK [NVt CN ICE BRITAIN Or UTA ICMI— MASSES T"s-AF fN•`14.I"1Y ' i blF Y a., TN ESU LrYiY l"A W,Asn-mn.Y T•.f ylYJY1YNlPru_ )NIA 1 • No • DAYS CAY NCL AN PASTOR Ly «fJ1 nI ' SVx3i•f(MCt •SSiN Ti0.tH 13 %A4 YA.HI'ixh TEMPORARY LO(A IICiN 14 1 3a Inl / Ni! PERU 11,1131 1i 33w.vY i 1.11 q YgIl13 I ,nrt •I qRM(HIpiSpY )q S {IY S MPpY ) H) V n' {n'I'Y1 + "L:I Ae +lO YneOH Vt iOl ]V• iIV L•t" 13U CI+r +f YM 03. wAh EH• wroY - ____ N417N f !05[IMf CAtNCIK [MVRCN rCOCY1- i(r 3(i•Y: r, n,.,+ H{Hi 1111 inN /ww,aslq MAnM3 nin +3ix •0740. i li,V Lli if 3 { /IY Ilt. , .Si.IH Sr )OS V13 uYl1[N�— Ch itches-Catholic, Roman 41iA. Mai a t,. )e.qb CrNr P: uN Ei..:wviiYlN f•4,IN t L.•V .•.W 116171 0[t UT Cf CVIOIL WC CMIM [X110 Yii1fY y rIY LL+r,liiY [Y:(IH fr • t 11 , Y L f r Y 974!3, CUR "of of LCLYO(S CATHOLIC 0441[ REV. LAWRENCE RATTLE PA)10e Qe d611 AM,1715L3 ZOPAL Irt•t (n:n 4 WW U117 "1 t �nbr, f:0 9N)IA Y +Y+ tM"U w IN.a MCx.1tW ,N•roc +.N W all, O.INLAMr THE ASfUDTnt CLTHCuC CLAREUoir [,• air Wn.Yn J a" Ills Y35f Ill 11+) 111 1aA Al° IV 1Y M•NH ew 1111IPV Z. Y's IvA'AI 11319 MI...,s AT'A A rM pro1.1., u1.• Cxr« «I+.r. LxY SH V +rnY (Yr IT I"s lblll) MASSES SAE r w In SOYO4 7 3 1 14 II JO A31 W[FKDAV UP SS I WAY CONI l SS V NS SA, 3.5 »rN Nirl N nru µ410N lrrir Ri4,Elr AdvlNtW SN ]HILL .fnr »AV IHAa. IY IY II I)iY CCT lrl3rY (( ti .1;1 rlr Cwn Y. Y °« Yr.liG LSS Mr•+liyr+f .. fa•flU 31 rLTU { ST HU' -- Sti.N W11[S. wt+ Nry 3.111% N» l4✓(YIY tla[N w {Rif R U AY X!•4.1 rIDA9 +)P�rHIu vt n +a. u• ru Drn •H1Rnwwlr•+ WVII In aY INr+11•w N Y. •11.I1U UO W • »f S+r+. ul�UU Churches- Charismolic ) I IYONA TLLLET CRMTILS cur"—, llY Ta ,I Y- „n RI c S ^Pin n:a'1l Cun :. Iola Y1• (\+O Ir M AY 1st \I 10 K YI ) Yr+rq M. I .AA 1srr 1+•Y• Iq S,.A l rY Ill, a %!Y tY. 1, Yr A RM Stvl, 1%if 4�lr r+) fT 3n{ 1N•+r..•. Y.,.YV..A1 wfu NS1 1 ONTCUII tut uTii[N- R1YSIP I WH,YW_1rOrVV1HY ti,AIc rI• +Y ( Wi .S 1HY 61. uH MRM•q YWY L14H34 ImbnVYN NIn I.ca Put eatn Wilts Whore you Sk,v Work (. ptay Y. + v •I 'a 1 I r�• 1 SUt1 u I Wrist uillar Ul•1110 WQIO [lIYfLT t1HlSi [101[1 -- A CJY[l Cull lrn4••4 tONV S 1 • U 11.0s MAN r+f10.2111 v =n yY 3 •v 11 v • Y 11 AV (u•y+s rw Iwl+ Yr 1• Ylw I .u)IlU v IPSG PAST04 M)wl C tNr I., M i IIAIrIM1i . M4)lM i . • Ili 1LN3 —s { {qN Y IT Al,v .1 +1 - •ASTOR I r rr it uuY Yir. r «Ir^r Yn. tn,w(HnH HIY tprM I IH ISYYry1•fn.wl IOM. HYY •1r•�1• C C'frw AlCr4inl �YKI(I t»YYS+N1 W ..Ili4LQ Frvwq Hl Y YW LYI ., r t1.MlY t.:.. st 1 ,Yr11rY C411 +i,+vrrtli w.xrr S'uIe �iL[YLY III STREET W n ST 011101' .• 31 I ' .+PIES C R' J1 nl. PAS' tjbN1YI I r vn+ I w+n l«1V mAYI "'r- i•• °YYif nlfnNnsrclauucrnclNaeu— 1n NN I - •.,PAT TY!•.•{`%D F°tCS 1l11m I - ILYJ> q vLPi Hirai W Y li! r •r 5[+••5 Mr.I ArY +gtrY ria1N• 4n 4 :M LPt{ t "BRIE •_ •, pY'i Y ferry Ur'Ar. Y rtl '+Yw fltSrIC.,.C.le.I.,rVltfLC--- i {'r.a< +rf( ae .Yn[ nYll+ ti UbPU baglV Il fS N.{ 6 P %% C 1 SC).r SY SCnAC J �o MS r�Hr S C1A1 H TSAIN'•ti• S r•1 - ' •SYI•) I 41JC$i °v USE All $LNVICF$ ,••\ a•.r.{ YFX.r19. Or•Ifrfi Nl Cllt >v r> ..etrs sItt'. ca ( YI +v3 Ylrrnu or .wn fll MN u4Wis HfiTrfE•INPAtJllit <ML'S[N OF tub le Will I ,.L E EEa-Y :IFT[ ' •nw +YawA1w" ( u)flls . yHiai CUIq .11 4[m4M K)(hl e•Jgm,ry en IY3VPI D'My f ;Iftefal a ... u,R•.a F .1a,iv uwY rOgL SAIII 4 9.19. S C'JIY llUlp IDi15T (NL1LN- { I uri.rlir Y+•nrily •lV •r 1 )+. +1. r+LLq M 11. Itr• ry+ I,wt {yafY4+ SNIJu Y� ( Iht N+ru.++1 fN )Ils Fnsw Mf.MfWYL4YY I YIY,++n e.4 tLV (131 `uw•rf'iriY+Y fvn t>YL ,� +.• rw._.... foals ' chvcfis 181 lurches - Brethren Churches - Catholic, Roman — (Cont'd) — (Cont'd) - '.nUENINCNRISrcYYRCNYrL1N> S In TNnrs CSTNOtIC cnmcx- Ro@fRf W x[vrr ryAV I.$.. vtNUUY F4TMtR PETER IREYYAN PASTOR !'r.+. Y t� hi Ywla /u n V1S1tf fH) H 1r Cdr Ut)i fYiW/i • IO1111133AV rnav CIA& VN/IV s:($s/{SSSt, iYHP• 0,31 43 Sli\IC[f (>VIIS:C^) InC3[ i3t YSSSIt 1,31 nw a ax' Yq to YlAI) lIN N 11,rr.r Nr of }Hl inn'�xlr�i:NY (µ,LL Sr CtORCt [ITNOIK [NVt CN ICE BRITAIN Or UTA ICMI— MASSES T"s-AF fN•`14.I"1Y ' i blF Y a., TN ESU LrYiY l"A W,Asn-mn.Y T•.f ylYJY1YNlPru_ )NIA 1 • No • DAYS CAY NCL AN PASTOR Ly «fJ1 nI ' SVx3i•f(MCt •SSiN Ti0.tH 13 %A4 YA.HI'ixh TEMPORARY LO(A IICiN 14 1 3a Inl / Ni! PERU 11,1131 1i 33w.vY i 1.11 q YgIl13 I ,nrt •I qRM(HIpiSpY )q S {IY S MPpY ) H) V n' {n'I'Y1 + "L:I Ae +lO YneOH Vt iOl ]V• iIV L•t" 13U CI+r +f YM 03. wAh EH• wroY - ____ N417N f !05[IMf CAtNCIK [MVRCN rCOCY1- i(r 3(i•Y: r, n,.,+ H{Hi 1111 inN /ww,aslq MAnM3 nin +3ix •0740. i li,V Lli if 3 { /IY Ilt. , .Si.IH Sr )OS V13 uYl1[N�— Ch itches-Catholic, Roman 41iA. Mai a t,. )e.qb CrNr P: uN Ei..:wviiYlN f•4,IN t L.•V .•.W 116171 0[t UT Cf CVIOIL WC CMIM [X110 Yii1fY y rIY LL+r,liiY [Y:(IH fr • t 11 , Y L f r Y 974!3, CUR "of of LCLYO(S CATHOLIC 0441[ REV. LAWRENCE RATTLE PA)10e Qe d611 AM,1715L3 ZOPAL Irt•t (n:n 4 WW U117 "1 t �nbr, f:0 9N)IA Y +Y+ tM"U w IN.a MCx.1tW ,N•roc +.N W all, O.INLAMr THE ASfUDTnt CLTHCuC CLAREUoir [,• air Wn.Yn J a" Ills Y35f Ill 11+) 111 1aA Al° IV 1Y M•NH ew 1111IPV Z. Y's IvA'AI 11319 MI...,s AT'A A rM pro1.1., u1.• Cxr« «I+.r. LxY SH V +rnY (Yr IT I"s lblll) MASSES SAE r w In SOYO4 7 3 1 14 II JO A31 W[FKDAV UP SS I WAY CONI l SS V NS SA, 3.5 »rN Nirl N nru µ410N lrrir Ri4,Elr AdvlNtW SN ]HILL .fnr »AV IHAa. IY IY II I)iY CCT lrl3rY (( ti .1;1 rlr Cwn Y. Y °« Yr.liG LSS Mr•+liyr+f .. fa•flU 31 rLTU { ST HU' -- Sti.N W11[S. wt+ Nry 3.111% N» l4✓(YIY tla[N w {Rif R U AY X!•4.1 rIDA9 +)P�rHIu vt n +a. u• ru Drn •H1Rnwwlr•+ WVII In aY INr+11•w N Y. •11.I1U UO W • »f S+r+. ul�UU Churches- Charismolic ) I IYONA TLLLET CRMTILS cur"—, llY Ta ,I Y- „n RI c S ^Pin n:a'1l Cun :. Iola Y1• (\+O Ir M AY 1st \I 10 K YI ) Yr+rq M. I .AA 1srr 1+•Y• Iq S,.A l rY Ill, a %!Y tY. 1, Yr A RM Stvl, 1%if 4�lr r+) fT 3n{ 1N•+r..•. Y.,.YV..A1 wfu NS1 1 ONTCUII tut uTii[N- R1YSIP I WH,YW_1rOrVV1HY ti,AIc rI• +Y ( Wi .S 1HY 61. uH MRM•q YWY L14H34 ImbnVYN NIn I.ca Put eatn Wilts Whore you Sk,v Work (. ptay Y. + v •I 'a 1 I r�• 1 I w+n l«1V mAYI "'r- i•• °YYif nlfnNnsrclauucrnclNaeu— 1n NN I - •.,PAT TY!•.•{`%D F°tCS 1l11m I - ILYJ> q vLPi Hirai W Y li! r •r 5[+••5 Mr.I ArY +gtrY ria1N• 4n 4 :M LPt{ t "BRIE •_ •, pY'i Y ferry Ur'Ar. Y rtl '+Yw fltSrIC.,.C.le.I.,rVltfLC--- i {'r.a< +rf( ae .Yn[ nYll+ ti UbPU baglV Il fS N.{ 6 P %% C 1 SC).r SY SCnAC J �o MS r�Hr S C1A1 H TSAIN'•ti• S r•1 - ' •SYI•) I 41JC$i °v USE All $LNVICF$ ,••\ a•.r.{ YFX.r19. Or•Ifrfi Nl Cllt >v r> ..etrs sItt'. ca ( YI +v3 Ylrrnu or .wn fll MN u4Wis HfiTrfE•INPAtJllit <ML'S[N OF tub le Will I ,.L E EEa-Y :IFT[ ' •nw +YawA1w" ( u)flls . yHiai CUIq .11 4[m4M K)(hl e•Jgm,ry en IY3VPI D'My f ;Iftefal a ... u,R•.a F .1a,iv uwY rOgL SAIII 4 9.19. S C'JIY llUlp IDi15T (NL1LN- { I uri.rlir Y+•nrily •lV •r 1 )+. +1. r+LLq M 11. Itr• ry+ I,wt {yafY4+ SNIJu Y� ( Iht N+ru.++1 fN )Ils Fnsw Mf.MfWYL4YY I YIY,++n e.4 tLV (131 `uw•rf'iriY+Y fvn t>YL ,� +.• rw._.... foals ' chvcfis 181 lurches - Brethren Churches - Catholic, Roman — (Cont'd) — (Cont'd) - '.nUENINCNRISrcYYRCNYrL1N> S In TNnrs CSTNOtIC cnmcx- Ro@fRf W x[vrr ryAV I.$.. vtNUUY F4TMtR PETER IREYYAN PASTOR !'r.+. Y t� hi Ywla /u n V1S1tf fH) H 1r Cdr Ut)i fYiW/i • IO1111133AV rnav CIA& VN/IV s:($s/{SSSt, iYHP• 0,31 43 Sli\IC[f (>VIIS:C^) InC3[ i3t YSSSIt 1,31 nw a ax' Yq to YlAI) lIN N 11,rr.r Nr of }Hl inn'�xlr�i:NY (µ,LL Sr CtORCt [ITNOIK [NVt CN ICE BRITAIN Or UTA ICMI— MASSES T"s-AF fN•`14.I"1Y ' i blF Y a., TN ESU LrYiY l"A W,Asn-mn.Y T•.f ylYJY1YNlPru_ )NIA 1 • No • DAYS CAY NCL AN PASTOR Ly «fJ1 nI ' SVx3i•f(MCt •SSiN Ti0.tH 13 %A4 YA.HI'ixh TEMPORARY LO(A IICiN 14 1 3a Inl / Ni! PERU 11,1131 1i 33w.vY i 1.11 q YgIl13 I ,nrt •I qRM(HIpiSpY )q S {IY S MPpY ) H) V n' {n'I'Y1 + "L:I Ae +lO YneOH Vt iOl ]V• iIV L•t" 13U CI+r +f YM 03. wAh EH• wroY - ____ N417N f !05[IMf CAtNCIK [MVRCN rCOCY1- i(r 3(i•Y: r, n,.,+ H{Hi 1111 inN /ww,aslq MAnM3 nin +3ix •0740. i li,V Lli if 3 { /IY Ilt. , .Si.IH Sr )OS V13 uYl1[N�— Ch itches-Catholic, Roman 41iA. Mai a t,. )e.qb CrNr P: uN Ei..:wviiYlN f•4,IN t L.•V .•.W 116171 0[t UT Cf CVIOIL WC CMIM [X110 Yii1fY y rIY LL+r,liiY [Y:(IH fr • t 11 , Y L f r Y 974!3, CUR "of of LCLYO(S CATHOLIC 0441[ REV. LAWRENCE RATTLE PA)10e Qe d611 AM,1715L3 ZOPAL Irt•t (n:n 4 WW U117 "1 t �nbr, f:0 9N)IA Y +Y+ tM"U w IN.a MCx.1tW ,N•roc +.N W all, O.INLAMr THE ASfUDTnt CLTHCuC CLAREUoir [,• air Wn.Yn J a" Ills Y35f Ill 11+) 111 1aA Al° IV 1Y M•NH ew 1111IPV Z. Y's IvA'AI 11319 MI...,s AT'A A rM pro1.1., u1.• Cxr« «I+.r. LxY SH V +rnY (Yr IT I"s lblll) MASSES SAE r w In SOYO4 7 3 1 14 II JO A31 W[FKDAV UP SS I WAY CONI l SS V NS SA, 3.5 »rN Nirl N nru µ410N lrrir Ri4,Elr AdvlNtW SN ]HILL .fnr »AV IHAa. IY IY II I)iY CCT lrl3rY (( ti .1;1 rlr Cwn Y. Y °« Yr.liG LSS Mr•+liyr+f .. fa•flU 31 rLTU { ST HU' -- Sti.N W11[S. wt+ Nry 3.111% N» l4✓(YIY tla[N w {Rif R U AY X!•4.1 rIDA9 +)P�rHIu vt n +a. u• ru Drn •H1Rnwwlr•+ WVII In aY INr+11•w N Y. •11.I1U UO W • »f S+r+. ul�UU Churches- Charismolic ) I IYONA TLLLET CRMTILS cur"—, llY Ta ,I Y- „n RI c S ^Pin n:a'1l Cun :. Iola Y1• (\+O Ir M AY 1st \I 10 K YI ) Yr+rq M. I .AA 1srr 1+•Y• Iq S,.A l rY Ill, a %!Y tY. 1, Yr A RM Stvl, 1%if 4�lr r+) fT 3n{ 1N•+r..•. Y.,.YV..A1 wfu NS1 1 ONTCUII tut uTii[N- R1YSIP I WH,YW_1rOrVV1HY ti,AIc rI• +Y ( Wi .S 1HY 61. uH MRM•q YWY L14H34 ImbnVYN NIn I.ca Put eatn Wilts Whore you Sk,v Work (. ptay Y. + v •I 'a 1 I r�• 1 Y� ( Iht N+ru.++1 fN )Ils Fnsw Mf.MfWYL4YY I YIY,++n e.4 tLV (131 `uw•rf'iriY+Y fvn t>YL ,� +.• rw._.... foals ' chvcfis 181 lurches - Brethren Churches - Catholic, Roman — (Cont'd) — (Cont'd) - '.nUENINCNRISrcYYRCNYrL1N> S In TNnrs CSTNOtIC cnmcx- Ro@fRf W x[vrr ryAV I.$.. vtNUUY F4TMtR PETER IREYYAN PASTOR !'r.+. Y t� hi Ywla /u n V1S1tf fH) H 1r Cdr Ut)i fYiW/i • IO1111133AV rnav CIA& VN/IV s:($s/{SSSt, iYHP• 0,31 43 Sli\IC[f (>VIIS:C^) InC3[ i3t YSSSIt 1,31 nw a ax' Yq to YlAI) lIN N 11,rr.r Nr of }Hl inn'�xlr�i:NY (µ,LL Sr CtORCt [ITNOIK [NVt CN ICE BRITAIN Or UTA ICMI— MASSES T"s-AF fN•`14.I"1Y ' i blF Y a., TN ESU LrYiY l"A W,Asn-mn.Y T•.f ylYJY1YNlPru_ )NIA 1 • No • DAYS CAY NCL AN PASTOR Ly «fJ1 nI ' SVx3i•f(MCt •SSiN Ti0.tH 13 %A4 YA.HI'ixh TEMPORARY LO(A IICiN 14 1 3a Inl / Ni! PERU 11,1131 1i 33w.vY i 1.11 q YgIl13 I ,nrt •I qRM(HIpiSpY )q S {IY S MPpY ) H) V n' {n'I'Y1 + "L:I Ae +lO YneOH Vt iOl ]V• iIV L•t" 13U CI+r +f YM 03. wAh EH• wroY - ____ N417N f !05[IMf CAtNCIK [MVRCN rCOCY1- i(r 3(i•Y: r, n,.,+ H{Hi 1111 inN /ww,aslq MAnM3 nin +3ix •0740. i li,V Lli if 3 { /IY Ilt. , .Si.IH Sr )OS V13 uYl1[N�— Ch itches-Catholic, Roman 41iA. Mai a t,. )e.qb CrNr P: uN Ei..:wviiYlN f•4,IN t L.•V .•.W 116171 0[t UT Cf CVIOIL WC CMIM [X110 Yii1fY y rIY LL+r,liiY [Y:(IH fr • t 11 , Y L f r Y 974!3, CUR "of of LCLYO(S CATHOLIC 0441[ REV. LAWRENCE RATTLE PA)10e Qe d611 AM,1715L3 ZOPAL Irt•t (n:n 4 WW U117 "1 t �nbr, f:0 9N)IA Y +Y+ tM"U w IN.a MCx.1tW ,N•roc +.N W all, O.INLAMr THE ASfUDTnt CLTHCuC CLAREUoir [,• air Wn.Yn J a" Ills Y35f Ill 11+) 111 1aA Al° IV 1Y M•NH ew 1111IPV Z. Y's IvA'AI 11319 MI...,s AT'A A rM pro1.1., u1.• Cxr« «I+.r. LxY SH V +rnY (Yr IT I"s lblll) MASSES SAE r w In SOYO4 7 3 1 14 II JO A31 W[FKDAV UP SS I WAY CONI l SS V NS SA, 3.5 »rN Nirl N nru µ410N lrrir Ri4,Elr AdvlNtW SN ]HILL .fnr »AV IHAa. IY IY II I)iY CCT lrl3rY (( ti .1;1 rlr Cwn Y. Y °« Yr.liG LSS Mr•+liyr+f .. fa•flU 31 rLTU { ST HU' -- Sti.N W11[S. wt+ Nry 3.111% N» l4✓(YIY tla[N w {Rif R U AY X!•4.1 rIDA9 +)P�rHIu vt n +a. u• ru Drn •H1Rnwwlr•+ WVII In aY INr+11•w N Y. •11.I1U UO W • »f S+r+. ul�UU Churches- Charismolic ) I IYONA TLLLET CRMTILS cur"—, llY Ta ,I Y- „n RI c S ^Pin n:a'1l Cun :. Iola Y1• (\+O Ir M AY 1st \I 10 K YI ) Yr+rq M. I .AA 1srr 1+•Y• Iq S,.A l rY Ill, a %!Y tY. 1, Yr A RM Stvl, 1%if 4�lr r+) fT 3n{ 1N•+r..•. Y.,.YV..A1 wfu NS1 1 ONTCUII tut uTii[N- R1YSIP I WH,YW_1rOrVV1HY ti,AIc rI• +Y ( Wi .S 1HY 61. uH MRM•q YWY L14H34 ImbnVYN NIn I.ca Put eatn Wilts Whore you Sk,v Work (. ptay Y. + v •I 'a 1 I r�• 1 UJ CI- erelts Churches- Christian •- -(Cont'd) AIR IN 011C4 IS trlAunIY CNVCCN- ••A GrL'1Y'`I.i EE CI arch m a EE Gr nng /Yea•• .1 rO wa -IC 130 W. S11 IA v-.tn G•aan a.w `, CYr Vtµ•M a1•wVlr 11 P.111 Jr N0.19U•SI.L91W vu `A.V1 nrlr VN al SfOf A +• eN 551+9\5 ,OATH TOW 11 "OCR Or CHRIST- I 'A ChlISTIAN CNU4CIr- SI•0N Mrtnlr p o m ••, u55t icnotL If D.V Y19•Ir •HIV IaHH419N1q t M5 a W LJI w I+SMFµ � 1 `•,li n,lrl^Idpltt lw i 'vtnr 9 NM '•( -t•me �rTN FYI Ila Vy I r, A Nw .. W NIeKi 358 L.•al .y 19.V a•I4 4n hn lw.•J � CrT•Iran /1 »U•pr•ww NTrI« Chmchas•Christian• Disciplc; Of Christ n9u [N:nn9r cNU+cN • (. r ..- .nr .O•.. IS I9 Y 181..8 C - •)f1Y 8Iµ 110 •V• 5t lr CYC YL 11 IT,$ .I MtlSL tµaY 41.Y Mil 5N i)N Churches - Christian S Missionary Alliance Inn(•.* p rn-... r.mr 1•ri �a.ti �rCr•n «KC -I4I Churches- Christian Reformed fIMY I CY. Y.n Fru.N C.r1 6I1-I118 (N.Y.rrxri•w CYnnp pryµ Sl l l ,a .•• Yn (t.Y 1 r It rY IC)CCUrr•VN 14"M 2w • e.. + « \+111 I.•r <•rru•u!µ•.rJ <YrN N r +y mullltw NNi,�- .�p[ry 4Ia5H1 Churches - Christian Science IrvCWltrCnNr l�nM 31 U aY t,r YN IC YY YM I hl IYI�::r...0 aYS1n . 8tH W nb. XLII \f Churches - Church Of Christ Churches•Church Of Christ — (Cont'd) rH 4Vµ1 pISM I4 \V I.11 nl \ry S•r•Mn•Y Mr H1•) ]IV Cw w Vna1 NI Pll p •. rNw to wlal IIIN 11•YMM .. .. ....SN aaN Churches- Church OF God 4 aw LN I1HYW% «,am) cNU[cN of uo nssT C. oKn AYSYA [•era 3.181 1aYY5 H\Y MYw Had ♦Y aN in in 51Y 1WM rIY m1I N 9111. eN tw\Iw CNVII[N CJ LOS tr CNI.10 HNa\X ry wrt n9 ry 1110=1 —c 11.11 CrC Mll A;Vil�s lllr C41YN SS9IY ♦ V N Irl )HY IN+I4 VU «a 1131 �•tts an9cN n wo ONTARIO Buxstor frY tVL \[w • � rMI10 ry wN tl+lr Aw)MI 4U8't[r CAVE YE ALL SERVICES S[IC [S N VY Vq M VY.V. r N•I IIiY1YN•� W02 lurches-Church Of Gods In Christ rn.CM. Y( ft pa tlrOlq r•II S I1M ru NIi9N .'ff CNUtd 0I CO3IN "nsr Y. %L Y~"ulri 5 w Is 10 surches•Church Of Jesus Christ Of latter -Day Sall, w «sun XI 511) «lµMl «r wr «I N(1 ar 113 w Am 58(119, «t M) «}lHr Y" l w mfr wm>\ 5 »vn YEIIOW PAGES.'Tels Where To Churches - Church OF Jesus Churches - Evangelical Christ Of latter -Duy c�txts3T0At FIll0'NSNI9 -� Saints— (Cont'd) 1 -_ SOUNCAY SCI-00L. 9 A �• VYa C.. UV1 YI (vru p ltllY On II Churches- Church OF The Bible Covenant w %iYS YrcNrw «I Churches- Church Of The M wf r•• •L+ r H �� [Y 1 [e,An'YYtM raYrq MrlO IM11% PENTCN 5 GA9'[lL. OD, ht.lsrer AIp ^re Wp1rR SenKt IOAM anA 1N•tl w.l YAn aAK RN (TVIn eY'IU1T v(Clp SUNUY MAIN V a AY a 10 AN C4RISTTAN EDUCATION 5 AM )nrlt••VH "t(Il) Mr nY `I&Suf Don t Clos. your doors at noora USIN,g C.1w hall or what you sea or do Is tko cto3lnq your door, at noon. CMLKI Nrnr ItN 1Y!•YN ....{!.• IIL YNSIrSw NI51'•YYILI•V..,•1 Iwlr Mwl•M•4.1 Nrr LY.r.a r Y <V m [N.SrYU 4 (41N ya Y MIUYLI laJ� Churchei•Fo urs qu are' Gospel ",'(• 1 }rI4STr0UI30Ua3[CNVi ;NCIi3 111 awNr...Ywa..r fiSH♦ M 19vfLV.aSIY- InN aIYJnwaYL Its ts . n, a =yl Y\ - iw�VY; p W FCY (NwYVYn Ina1 C,t •lV CpYYLNwii FOLIMAXECNe1111a •YIIII c33L'Is A CHUx UPLIHD THAT CAC - tIV snrllp .• rmnl sr.r sYrl t ,o- w.wYYq r\. arM1NN rww t. I � ri'iiY' xw•r•14a I.nW tl Y In Ix 4wu YV•. •w bV.NW tvl 3 C+•aa Y nal ....K urchas -Free Method* [NLTNOaST CNestN 'rt lnan VIEW Flit MclacrosTD Nl Retlr 1. NrwlAxe!A5 S✓dar50c19 455Yaft$11 sd,rE.teJOrp ` 19wwtY nY 'r..� N•rq• M w 4oY4 Crf•. 5F 5y1 nn M5Y 1 Fundomenlcl •• IauAO ante [NUSCx trw� ss5 o3w r+awnll9lw V-rrya sarlr bltr • _ it" •wCY• 1IM.... F, Ilia W Ills L' ✓...........• =•L Churches. I Interdenomine .1 CNntaat "it or wluL) vltltr 1n Lrn Y [MY\ Ir 1 [Y.IC6es —ties hutch ls- Presbyteric n, United is IIESTIT12111"..10 Unocal ..1t'• -1rH•V ( r ^t. ••.. H•V Aft— "it �p„r• V!_ll y nwnsn..rcwt�__ _. G Gnt «t.++ wrlx I '[STYIafTE1 FPS SeiTV%ICIVRCH- IIY e•Jt.r • ur u'1•a• uw• rnur 1 1 is••.n»� -w nnH. •r.•s .WU ur. ur+m rYle Nas. en a.91it :hutches - Reformed In America HYS VILLE' I tlOIWI3 0004 WE CARE r..BOUT YOU G]. .'If" 'l, [I.ctI r•I]a Rv [I. I'.[. a LnHYY lYr C n,wn uor{f • le•u r no. tun. u••x a a,v Yu +nu•t l.�. In mr %ru E:...a1 Cn11 : Yp11th PrCgrams L,Vn[Chnl� +nKn Ava'labl. • %stn YELOW :hurcnos- Seventh -Day Churches - United Methodist Adventist — (Cent'd) W fI...•S•.,YYD•r •1•Mn f IRVI Vento YET HCGIST MITICHO <..[. u•nnv, •.[w Rn +IIf OON Ntt``S cxp0lw ee SEKYM %IRO u:C\PG Y•:CSgr N] a 11,L. DAY of, AILS 12441% nl. WA. Sour ft"001•%,Y ILRN OST tOYIRtliT (MACH --1 eJ•PP Uti 1 u •Y H +>]a IINLS W WOlile r.Siee r0V Y Gr:J13 YlY 3 r Y yY1.Y f-Yw fn• %•wMrSYH.V car+ H• N snc •. CM<is ... 911 wf C•Ct4lY YYH Mi INS w«+u N•.'n c«n .w% nl NN-041 AD leToo alV{W W.tW e• ..Y'r n•.w Ilw•1fui �Y y'yY •II.9i11 Chvrches•Unitorian VaiVICIIfI Tn11TYLIMITEDYLiNCaSTCNaICN- , cHn.w«• %.v G.n••r r.•• %,^1 Ya IH•u niV.W S..o bIYUniversalist rw J•MYf ='., a r•wrY•Ow r.w •.YYtY II.Hn •If 1Y 1110.1. \KOIY Churches- United Church Of hurches- Unity. Christ , -" _. uan ant 111MIL CONCRICiTICN•L CITI wv vul ww.l rr o,.nnrn 014 • AH.IR •n Cn, c,'. 4W. I::•,:: o.+�r^,' _• •s'tlm Churches- Universal Churches- United Methodist T� I I3C• •J W .nn., r�.•r. " mile, - -- ({!t[Y wide or ^� W " "'V CGl •Yll A-, ,IA CfIeNISM a e0G(GS Ymbr IT 41r em ra�1 c.Vxx In nvr oR AT MU, _ tt�CCjl IIINUt R(1tI1Y10 . W.'s V•tI W[ WY•G %M4., H40r1 I .ACx n1 w l.'W 1A C', oV G, NrV r•r. �.-•1 Gll0• °t EOHlo]YT UYno YITMC.ISi tits n1VICN .,1A(7••III Gil ]I Church es•Religious Science cyuY]uawltmknxsenrctrJtcx- �I C:Wr.I Y� -1.fYl L'nM1M two•• f ten% u H • v IC tNCCM . (x110 U[t ll °0 • Y ): ]•ewuaeCwx Did, ILnfwn••:n arof %• L, .. .. I••r. ,, 3• .n Gi1Jl1S Chucche s -R cor g o r• I:e d Church Of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints .x.1..r• twr. a Jnw t.m cr wVUrt .• 1 Ilni.tl.nN')Y Vw•, Yr l•MAgop Sale tlmet Find a dealer • in your ne.ghborhood by looking in the YELLOW PAGES nr•'YL4'rlx l color PASTOR a S.Y • •v w. u oY.Rw.r.« ,)p r.na 4 V.YY Gl+)III 1u11 q. Ht l . uw r'+ s`,CCiirltr li li .'I r.R­,imtiw • ow.� i.n o.'.�. ff lrV bOa 1KW1 6r%YwY aO'I Orin SfY)IM Adver.'sa all yaw Products - end services In the YELLOW PAGES - Clot Moore n" NSICTCrs later at ]ITS cost Fellowship Of Metropolitan Community f1°rttlllN ((0VM!RIIT CNYIa1 or—' IOYCU SUHCAY AY 5[0Y 11 (1) A \I All I V.w. f, w 12191% who makes Ili who sees 117 Who ft." 117 YELLOW PAGES ten It' FOR YOUR EVERY RECREATIONAL HEED •w.c n2o Hut.0 mn. wO"0'°°n •• n�•.Klca�'wi srN rvs 0(lA11. Oluvel IsT rw•uwlo•o II" no ,l eons I, cISSN[0 PW t CUr let w COfl0114 CUT COMPDif G]a "Net* L II4 C,Nionk CALRE mu,911]0 /NOHI ���•%3 %•bbl "Tells Churches- Various •v''; Denominations uwan"YC.ww HI. {.I •.Wl..wxu. Churchel-Wesley"on Milo rns Cigar, Cigarette & Tobaccoi Dealers - Retail 911, M,.w r, r..• . eo" agar, Cigarette & Tobaccs!1 Dealers -Whsle P4vwn1164vCw1•R.f er•' :sl n91lfn.IrnH.n ,.,are ii ct�•swl elos CW aOYYw•,CV/• M uwn unto ll nc SYffSilYy1.1aSce W, Ogoretle Vending Modlinry Y•ndiny MHhwH 1,J^ Cili]ero Band Batlic, �1C s.. t.d. G'elnvxkerwn lawY �•!( a STV. Cry Government Offices Iwo G'.WrGSol .1 DIAn.A• a1 City & Regional Planners I Y.a .. clay Pro ducts• See Al,o i Pottnp,""ta ,n.•d Pono,yWh,te & Mtn_ •M1 1 Ce1oe[ tl11 /i COVCA can Room Facilities ui•T.faN:rrw.s s•C. ° hfovmg7 ^clunk PhMes1 A Ails good a �yq O•TG on'ss{,t dd r �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNCA STAFF REPORT Date: August 22, 1979 -o: Planting Commission From: Jack I=, Director of Carmunity Development Subject ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION 1,0. 79 -06 - PETER POPOFF EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION - A recuest to develop an Evangelistic Center on 7 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ramona and 19th, Streets BACRCROUND: The Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association 1s requesting a determination by the Planning Commission o determine if their pro- posal for an Evangelistic Center would be permitted In the R -1 (single family residential tone) Attached is an outline of the ministries to he provided at the center (Exhibit "A ") Thr subject property is located on the northeast corner of Ramona and 19th Streets (Exhibit "B ") The site is bounded on the south by 19th Street (State highway 30), on the north by the proposed freeway, on the vest by an approved apartment development, and on the east by an approved Hurch site ANALYSIS: The County Zoning Ordinance presently lists churches as a use that may be permitted If approved by the Planni RC Commission under the Site Approval process The Issue before the Planning Commission relative to this determination. Is whether the type of activities pro- posed to occur within the evangelistic center are similar in nature to those of a church Most of the activities listed by the applicants seem to be more aligned with off lee type uses There are certainly inci- dental office use that occur within a church facility. However, at what point does the office type uses become more of a primary use rather than an assessory or fucldentel use] Typically, churches contain a sanctuary for weekly worship services, and a fellot,9itlp hall and christfan education buildings for Sunday actual classes and mid -week studies. Churches are generally designed to accommodate groups or p opic for meeting purposes at certain times during the week Incidental office use of the church generally om.,sts of an office for the pastor, secretary, and lossibly an associate pastor, depending on the size of the church The number of employees for a church facility during the week usually amounts to 2 -3 people The description of tie i_`nod activities provided by the applicant, out- lines the majority of the uses as some tire of office use Only a small chapel is planned rot use by staff It appears as though the Intent of this center is not to develop a use whose primary function is to provide a meeting place similar to a church but to provide more of an administrative center which would employ potentially 60 onployees 135 ITETI "F„ 0 • • • There are three options available to thou Planning Commission: 1 The CoraniFn Ion could find that the proposed use Is aiallar tc the activities of a churcl, If this finding is made, it does not neon than the propooed use 1s approved for this site The approval for me of the site would be accomplished through the successful anpletlon of the Site Approval process which wu.d Include a public hearing and property owner noti- tication 2 The Commission could find that the use is out similar to a church or any other use listed in the R -1 zone 3 The Planning C®ission could, as a final opt ton, fLd that the use is not similar to those uses listed in the R -1 zone and then initiate a General Plan Amendment to change the area to a mixed use eategury This would then remit the applicant to apply for a zone change .o A -P (Adminlst rat ive- Prof ossionnl) which would allow the office uses proposed by the applicant. The justification for such an Amendment is based upon the fact that to the cast 1s an already existing Umrch, to the south is 19th Street and further south homes which buck -up to 19th. to the west an approved apartment project and to the earth the proposed freeway or Highland Avenue. If the Commission consents to this action, then the amendment could be added to the list for September In addition. if this to tlr final decision, the applicant should be made aware that the �%isting signs on the site would have to be rmoved and that the uses proposed by the applicant can not be torxl.cted on the site until the zone change is adopted and site plan review completed RECOMENDATION: is recommended that the Planning Commission review ill the above on ..s and issue and direct staff to the action domed appropriate by the Commission Respectfully submitted, JFCR IAlI, Director of Community Develp{ment t lJ IL:IW:m Attachments: Letter from Peter Popoff Lora[ ton Hap tab JG'etnrt `� n jwI'��, uaoz�eliolac t�fl400cialian � POST OFFICE BOX 641 -- UPLAND CALIFORNIA 91786 • July 26, 1979 .•1 Rancho Cucamonga City 4all 9346 Baseline Road Alta Loma, California Attention, Planning Commission Gentlemen, In reference to Securing a permit for construction of our proposed building, attachod hereto is a Summary of the re- • quested information I hope this will give you an overall viav of our pre•,ent organization and our projections for the future If I can be of further assistance, please let me know �Sir�cerely, Poter Popoff P r a 1dant PPrab ' ` \' 137 • Peter Popoff Evnn elietie Association Summary of Ministries Radio Ministry- -Taped radio broadcasts (from % xisting ,mall studio) mailed to 68 stations Faith Messenger Magazine-- publisheo monthly and printed by local printers Counseling Ninietry - -Me have employees who counsel by mail and also by telephone Computer Operati handle uupp to 50t times u its present w capacity Nail Department-ichhandles assette tapes, books and other literature Total number of Employees --10 0 Addition Ninistri a Co be Included Ln New Building u Chapel -"ee r vl coscwl l ll bas held, with the staff and visiting guests Printing Press- -A snail printinpress t handle sma -1 printing projects Educational Fd,ilities Crisis Center - expansion of existing counsell g ministry with a telephone hot -lino with a staff member on call 24 hrs a day protected increaee in staff - -over a 10 yr period, we expect to expand to approximately 40 employees l3� I, w 1:• t V 'L l� -r ' t1 c L c V E fl w o F t A. Q 4 3nN3AV 47VOM -) t' �3 sc Z w T � L s pp0 d` 22 0 M E M 0 R A N 0 U M DATE: September 14, 1979 TO City Council FROM: Lauren M Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT City Refuse Cullection Service In October 1818, the City Council reviewed two staff proposals regarding the collection of refuse in Rancho Cucamonga The proposals were a draft of an nrdinance establishing minimum guidelines for the collection of residential rubbish and d reconriendation to franchise private refuse operators ir. the City. The City Council deferred action on both proposals for a six month period in order to study the matter further Unfortunately, because of the workload, the staff was delayed in returning the issue to the City Council for a decision until now Both State and Federal laws require that cities make provision for the collection of residential rubbish. lhis may be done by providing for city- operated collection or by a separate arrangement with private refuse contractors The starf recommends that tte latter approach be followed The franchising of privete refuse operators will insure the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga that they »ill receive an adequate level of service which will be maintained tnrough strict compliance of the ordinance and the contract between the City and the refuse companies Although service provided prior to incorporation was regulated only by the County, it ntwm seems appropriate for the City to franchise all existing refuse collectors The primary reason the staff is recommending a franchise be granted is not only to prot:ct the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga by assuring that d high quality lev:i of service is available, but also to insure the refuse operators that they wil have a definite period of time in which to amortize the replacement costs for equipment The present cost of a refuse truck ranges between $75,000 and $100,000. In order to make certain that only the best equiprment is used for refuse collection, the City must have assurance that vehicles will be replaced on a programmed basis. It is obviously immortant that only safe, well- maintained equipment be -ised in the City It is significant to note that a city franchise will place the authority for rate adjustments with the City Council, rather than with a County rate study committee anu the Board of Supervisors The City presently has no involveurnt In evaluating pending requests for refuse rate increases It seems appropriate 4 that deci.i,)ns affecting city residents be made locally rather than by the County Board of Supervisors I LLA City Council September 14, 1979 Page Two while a franchise arrangemunt will not guarantee that consumer comklaints will decrease, a franchise will establish a contractual relationship with clear lines of authority between the City and the refuse operators Resioents pre- sently have no assistance available to help resolve L.mplaints However, if the refuse operators are franchised by the City, our residents will have recourse through the City to voice complaints should the need arise while it is apparent in talking with some residents that on occasion the refuse companies could be more responsive to complaints, it Is also important for the City Council to recognize that it is impossible to satisfy all consumers It may be further to the City's advantage to franchise refuse service since It has been de- ermined by the State and Federal Governments that it is a city's responsibility to maintain the public health and welfare of the community Franchising will serve as ti, proper vehicle for maintaining the necessary control in the area of public health Rev=nue to Cite It is proposed that the City enact a franchise fee of five percent. This amount is equal to the rate adopted in other California communities e fs the City Council is aware, nearly all of the public parkways in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are in deplorable condition. It is, therefore, recommended that all revenue earned fron refuse franchise fees be earmarked for the re- design and renovation of existing unsightly public parkways. Franchise fees will provide an additional source of revenue which may be combined with beauti- fi.ation fees .nd general funds to solve the City's parkway problem within a shorter period of time Althoagh the revenue to the City will be approximately $25,000 per year at this time, that figure will increase as the City develops, enabling the City to deal with the need for parkway renovation more rapidly rranchisinq will also provide a measure of assurance to refuse operators that there will be sufficient funds available to purchase equipment required to serge newly developed areas of the City Ir summary, it is important to note that during the last eighteen months the staff has scheduled frequent meetings with all of the refuse collectors operating In Rancho Cucamonga. ine operators have been very cooperative and have, in fact, participated in the preparation of the enclosed ordinance and the proposed refuse contract s 141 City Council September 14, 1979 ` Page Three P.econrrendation: It is recommended that the following act on Council: by the City Counci / a Approve the franchising ofd refuse operators in Rancho Cucamonga I at a rate if five percent out of gross receipts b Instruct the staff and City Attorney to evaluate the proposed 1 agreement for refuse operators working in the City of Rancho Cucamona c Schedule the proposed ordinance providing for the controlled collection an.1 disposal of residential refuse for a public hearing on October 1 1979 d. Instruct the staff to study refuse collection rates in San Bernardino County and to submit a recommendation to the City Council LM baa A 0 a N-L DRAFT ORDINANCE NO _ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI- • FORNIA, PROVIDING FOP, THE CONTROL, COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Char ea for Collection of Refuse A monthly charge for the co. ect ono re use s e ma a against the occupants of each residential unit within the City The amount of such monthly charge shall be fixed from time to time by the City Council by resolution; provided, however, no change in such amounts shall be effective un- til thirty (30) days after the adoption of the resolution changing the same The monthly charge may vary within the City if the City . Council determines that refuse collection costs in some areas exceed those in other areas because of location, topography or other reasons SECTION 2: Method of Billies Refuse collection charges for each residential un tiTs aTi- billed by and collected by thq collector that provides services to such unit Refuse collection charges shall be due and payable upon being billed SECTION 3: Liability for Pa went In the event thr occupant of a resi3enc=iunit a s cc pay reuse collection charges within thirty (30) days following the billing thereof, the owner of the premie upon which such residential unit is located shall also become liable for the payment of such charges SECTION 4: Penalty for Non - Payment A penalty of one hundred percent T00%)­67—the aunt e s ,a a assessed against any person liable for payment of a collection charge who fails to pay such charge within thirty (30) days following the date of billing thereof SECTION i Adlustment for Vacancies No collection charges shall be charged ur ng the term tat a res dential unit is vacant, provided that written notice of the commencement of the vacancy is given to the servicing collector For the purposes of this section, a vacancy shall be deemed to commence on the first (1st) day of the month following the actual beginning of the vacancy, and the vacancy shall be deemed to terminate on the first (1st) day of the month during which the residential unit or commercial establishment is occupizd or re- occupied SECTION 6 Refuse Defined "Refuse" shall mean and include garbage, combus�ble rum3is tenon- combustible rubbish (a) "Garbage" shall mean and include all kitchen and table refuse, leavings, offal, and every accumulation of organic matter which attends the preparation, consumption, decay or dealing or atorag3 of meat, fish, fowl, fruits and vegetables "Garbage" does not include • human body waste or liquid swill l qt- (b) "Combustible rubbish" shall mean and include but shall not be limited to paper, cardboard, rags, clothing, books, footwear, packing materials, grass, leaves, brush, and other substances that will incinerate through con.act with flames of ordinary temperature "Combustible rubbish" shall not include explosives or flammable liquids. (c) "Non - combustible rubbish" shall mean and include but shall not be limited to cans, bottles, ass, wire, ashes and other solid waste matter that will not incinerate though contact with flames of ordinary temperature "Non- combustible rubbish" shall not include furniture, large household appliances, junk autos or parts therefrom, dirt, rock or material from t a demoli �n, alteration or construction of buildings SECTIO4 7: Other Definitions. For the purposes of this Or dinance, tie =owing words and phrases shall have the following meaning: (a) "Apartment house" shall mean a building, or Portion thereof, designed for occupancy by four (4) or more families; living independently of each other. (b) "Commercial" shall mean any business, indi. ry, :osmercfal establishment or construction site S (c) "Collector" shall mean any person or company designated by the City Council by ordinance, resolution or contract to collect refuse within the City (d) "Each residential unit" shall mean each place us:d for residential purposes for a single family. If more than one (1) family is in one (1) dwelling, such dwelling shall constitute as many units as there are families Any residential unit used secondarily for business purposes may be considered a commercial unit for the put- Poses of assigning charges for special collection purposes SECTION 8: Rece gclea Required Except as provided in this Ordinance T awT—f ! For any person to keep, place or deposit refuse in cr upon any public or private property except in refuse recep- tacles which comply with the requirements of this Ordinance SECTION 9 Refuse Receptacles Residential ( ") Except as provided in this section, all refuse from a residential unit shall be kept in a metal or pinstic receptacle which hat a tight- fitting cover which prevents the escape of odors, and which is equipped with at least two (2) bails or handles Receptacles shall not be less than five (5) gallons nor more than forty (40) gallons in capacity, nor shall the maximum gross weight of a loaded receptacle set out for collection exceed sixty -five (65) pounds in weight _2_ /4 (b) Crass clippings, leaves and other yard :work debr�, other than branches or tree limbs, may be either deposited in metal cr Plastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or in wooden or sturdy cardboard boxes, tubs or similar receptacles Ii cardboard boxes are used, the cardboard boxes along with the contents shall be considered refuse set out for collection and both the cardboard boxes and contents shall be collected (c) Branches, tree limbs or other similar debris shall be tied with sturdy twine, rope or wire, in bundles not exceeding four feet (4') in length nor 18 inches (18 ") in diameter (d) Newspapers and magazines may be either deposited in metal or plastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or tied with sturdy twine, rope or wire, in bundles not exceeding fifty (50) pounds in weight. (e) Cardboare boxes may be either flattened and deposited in metal or pplastic receptacles, as above mentioned, or may be flattened and tied in bundles not exceeding four feet (4') in length nor fifty (50) pounds in weight (f) Apartment houses may utilize commercial type collection bins and shall do so if required by the collector serving the apartment house When an apartment house utilizes commercial type bins one (1) bin shall be furnished for each multiple of six (6) res- idential units or fraction thereof (g) Garbage may be fed to animals upon property • where animals may lawfully be kept in the City if proper sanitary conditions are maintained SECTION 10: Expense of Refuse Rece tacles Refuse receptacles required y this shall a prow a y the occupants of each residential unit or commercial establishment within the City and with- out expense to the City SECTION 11 Rece tacles: Cleanliness. The exteriors of the refuse recept�inc u ng covers, shall s Kept clean The interior of refuse receptacles shall be cleaned periodically to prevent accumula- tion of grease or decomposing materials SECTION 12: Placement of Refuse Containers (a) Except when set out for collection as herein provided, refuse shall be kept within a building or otherwise out of view from the public right -of -way adjacent to any property (b) No refuse shall be placed upon a -y public street, alley, sidewalk or right -of -way in such a manner as to impede or endanger pedestrian or vehicular traffic (c) Refuse, other than refuse contained in commercigIL type receptacles, shall be placed at the curb for collection, but not p ro eighteen (18) hours before the scheduled collection day -3- 1 vS (d) All receptacles shall be removed from public • view the same day collection service is rendered (a) All commercial -type collection bins or dropp bodies shall be placed in an area which is easily accessible to col- lection personnel SECTION 13: Periods to Set Out Refuse and Time for Collection Any refuse tame n ng smco ecte a tar t e comp ec ono co act on n that block shall constitute prima facie evidence that such refuse -as set out for collection after the aspiration of the time designate. for collection in that block The person making the late deposit shall return all uncollected refuse to the premises from whenco it came or shall arrange for a special collection to be made SECTION 14: Garbage to Be Wrapped Garbage shall be wrapped in paper or n p antic a equate to contain it without spillage or leakago before it is deposited in a refuse receptacle shall be un�for any person to incentionai.y e��e�. ••_•• -� -• mutilate, damage or destroy any refuse receptacle or cover thereof, _ provided, however, that this section shall not apply to the owner of such reface receptacle or a person action under the direction of the owner SECTION 16: Combined Collection Garbage and non - combustible • and combustlFre-T—Obish may be placed n the same refuse receptacle for combined collection SECTION 17: Collection Frequency All refuse generated by resident a un is s aTiFe--cZ ecte a minimum of once a week. SECTION 18 Garbage and Refuse Accumulation Every person owning or occupy any tiullding, lot. or premises in the City shall keep such property in a clean and sanitary condition and shall not cause or permit garbage or combustible rubbish to accumulate for more than one (1) calendar week, or cause or permit non - combustible rubbish to accumulate for more than one (1) calendar month Any accumulation of refuse for a period of time in excess of the times prescribed in this section is hereby declared to be a public nuisance, and said public nuisance may be summarily abated upon order of the City Manager All costs of abating such public nuisance shall be charged against the perso, who had the resposlbility of not to cause the accumulation SECTION 14: Dangerous and Infected Materials. (a) No person shall place ur deposit in any rubbish receptacle for collection pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance any unbroken hypodermic needle, drugs, poisons, acids, dangerous checi- cals, explosives, or any other substance which might cause the death of or injury to a human being ® (b) No person shall place in any refuse receptacle for collection pursuant to the provisions of this Ordinance any clothing, bedding, or other article which is contaminated by reason of being in contact with a person who has an infectious or contagious disease. Such clothing bedding, or other article shall be disposed of only in accordance -4- / l v with the directions of the County Health Officer. SECTION 20: Dead Animals. (a) No person shall place the body of any dead animal upon or under any public or private property in the City ex- cept such place or places designated for dead animal disposal by the City Manager (b) The owner of any dead animal shall cause the body to be removed to a place designated by the City Manager, as soon as possible, at the owner's expense In the event the owner of a dead animal is unknown, or cannot be immediately located, tb- City shall cause the removal of such dead animal Any employee of, or other person authorized by, the City may enter onto private property for the purpose of disposing of the bodies of dead animals - (c) The City Council shall establish a charge for the removal of dead animals, and said charge shall be collected from the owner of any dead animal which is removed by the City Refuse a ty may contract with persons or companies for the collec- tfo—n, removal and disposal of refuse, which contract shall provide, among other thinFe, for the number of collections, manner of emptying recepta- cles and obedience to sanitary regulations Said contracts may provide for a franchise fee, in an amount determined by the City Council, to be • paid to the City. SECTION 22: Unauthorized Collectors Except where a person or company s out or zed to cone hue co ect on services pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 4272, it shall be unlawful for any person, other than the holder of a current refuse contract with the City, to collect or co remove any such receptacle from the place where the same is placed by the person entitled to possession thereof, or to remove the contents of any such receptacle This section applies only to the collection and removal of refuse from residential units SECTION 23: Refuse Truck Regulations Any person or company holding a refuse concrac- with the a city s provide an adequate number of vehicles and equipment expressly and especially designed for the con- tainment, collection and ttansportation of refuse Said trucks shall be equippe.l so as to prevent the spilling or dropping of any refuse or liquid therefrom Said trucks, when not in use, if kept within the boundaries of the City, shall be kept only upon private property in a zone which allows the parking of trucks No refuse truck shall be parked overnight in the City while partially or fully loaded with refuse SECTION 24: Deposit of Waste Prohibited It shall be unlawful for any pperson to cause, oft, any sewage, commercial or indutrM waste, or waste of any other nature, to remain or be deposited or discharged upon the surface of the ground on any public or private • property -5- 1Y7 SECTION 25: Exceptions: Aplicaiton and Appeal (a) Any person desiring to secure an exception from any provision of this Ordinance may apply therefore in writing to the City Manager (b) The City Manager is authorized to grant exceptions from the provisions of this Ordinance if he finds that all of the following conditions exist: (1) Granting the exception would not be detri- mental to the public health and safety; (2) Not to grant the exception would result in undue hardship to the applicant; and, (3) The hardship which would result to the applicant from not granting the exception is a hardship which would not generally apply to other property in the City. (c) The action of the City Manager in granting or denying an exception to the provisions of this Ordinance shall be in writing, and shall be served upon the applicant in person or by mail and shall also be posted in three (3) public places within the City. Any person residing or owning property within the City may appeal the action of the City Manager to the City Council The action of the City Manager shall be final unless written notice of appeal 1s filed with the is City Clerk not more than thirty (30) days following the date of posting of the action by the City Manager SECTION 26: Violations Any person violation any of the pro- visions o c s r inance s=a be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by fine of not more than $500 00 or imprisonment for not more than six '6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment Any violation continuing for more than one (1) day shall be deemed to be a separate violation for each day said violation exists SECTION 27. Enforcement It shall be the duty of the City Manager to en of rce the previews of this Ordinance The City Attorney, upon request of the City Manager, shall institute any necessary legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance including, but not limited to, instituting an action for and obtaining and injunction from a court of competent jurisdiciton APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1978 AYES NOES ABSENT: ® Mayor of the City of nc o ucamonga -6- M CITIZEN REFUSE COMPLAINT LOG lL�q • `•'' DATE SERVICE COMPLAINT COMPANY RESPONSE 3/27/79 Rancho Will not pick up trash. Being NONE harassed by pick -up men d office. 3/27/79 Rancho Trucks leave debris on streets and NONE refuse to clean it up. 3/8/79 Ranchc Trucks leave debris on streets and Referred to Planning hydrolic fluid. Refuse to clean up. 3/8/79 Rancho Gave her wrong pick up day Will not NONE { give good service. 2/23/79 Yukon Co. left dumpster on street since Dec. Rocks were thrown in Called five times not responsive. dumpster. Had to be removed but had no time. 1/23/79 Rancho Dropping hydrolic fluid on streets Referred to Planning. and then dropping sand to absorb however, leaving sand on street. 12/20/78 Rancho Dropping hydrolic fluid on street. Don Gdula sent letter No Response. • 1/8/79 Yukon Called Co every day since 1/3/79 NONE .y Co says they will be there but never come. changed to Rancho. 1/3/79 Ranchc Promised pick up on 2/24 Should NONE have picked up 2/22. Never showed 12/13/78 Rancho No pick up for three weeks Has NONE paid bill No response from Co. a 12/01/78 Rancho Won't pick up trash says can is too NONE 1 large but picks up neighbors same r size Office is arrogant and non- responsive. Y 11/29178 Rancho Day late NONE 11/29/78 Yukon Leave trash for two or three days NONE every week Neighbors trash left on street for two weeks Office arrogant on phone it 11/15/18 Rancho Pick up is irregular Phone calls No excuse, says will get no response Neighbors also be picked up today. Was �r involved not Called 11/16 had co. make up special servo card. lL�q • E CITIZEN REFUSE COM"INT LOG •continued DATE SERVICE COMPLAINT COMPANY RESPONSE 11/14/78 Yukon Seldom pick up on schedule. Office NONE rude on phone. 10/11/78 Rancho Trash dumped on street also cans NONE left on street all week. No re- ponse from office. 10/11/78 Rancho Pick up two weeks late. New driver on route. 10/11/78 Rancho Pick up four weeks late. ' 10/6/78 Yukon Trash out for five days after NONE. Picked up 10/7 normal pick up. Calls but gets no satisfaction. 10/5/78 Rancho Cannot contact service, phone Picked up 10/6. always busy. No pick up for two weeks. • E I CONTRACT THIS caa?Acr, made and entered into this _ day of , 19 in the City of Rancho Cu= =9;3, County of San Bernardino, State of California, by an between: MIE MY OF RXXW QA'AMKA, a Minicipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as .CM. 1' and �1�C11 ` -WICHO MOOSN., a yu G n 'ti., hereinafter referred to as .CON� WITNESSETR: ikotE'As, heretofore C^.1Y has duly adopted and ester l4shed certain statues, ordinances, rules and regulations oau"�ing the collection, reroval and disposal of garbage, waste, refuse, rubbish offal, trimaings, and other refuse matter within the City of Rancho Cucaaongar mid SOMUM, said Statutes, ordirmnees, rules and regulations authorize the City C==il of CITY to contract with any person, fi m or corporatien for the collection, rahwal and di-pocal of such garbage, waste, refuse, rubbish, offal, triamings and other refuse matter within the City of Rancho Cucarcrga. Mi. 9iElMUM, in consideration of the mhtsil cotenants and agremrata herein- after contained, the pubes hereto mjrce as follows: 151 0 0 AF=CLE I All provisions of the "tatbish Ordinance•, Ordinance No._ are as it may be • modified from tiara to time, of the City of Panda Cucmnaga are incorporated in this Contract as if the same were set forth in full. S=CN 1. D FI IITICCS : Ebr the purpose of this Omtract, the following words and phrases axe defined and shall be construed as follows, unless it shall be apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended: A. "COLLECTION" shall mean the operation of gathering together garbage, rubbish, and waste material and transporting the same to thb point of disposal. B. "CONTAINER" shall mean a receptable constructed of metal or other materials designed for the containment of refuse act forth here- Inafter. C. 'CONTRACTOR" shall mean the person entering into the • contract with the City for the collection and disposal of garbage , rubbish and waste material. N 'f! & 1) "E SECTION• shall moan the complete area con- tained in the City imits Louth.. y pouch. of the street of Harr, Lino. D. "DISPOSAL" shall bean the complete operation of treating and disposing of the accumulations of rubbish, waste material and the products or residue arising from such treatment. E. "EXCLUDED MATERIALS" shall mean those wastes and other materials not included in definition of Rubbish, Garbage or Haste Material, including: any object not easily moved by one man, such as discarded automobile bodies, refrigerators, stoves, or other bulky or heavy objects, or warts material resulting from any manufacturing, building or construction operation, manure,offal, waste from any poultry yard or stable, logs, stumps or limbs from trees exceeding four (4) inches in diameter or three (3) feet in length, sod, and dirt or similiar material. 1� ^ P. 'GARBAGE' shall include, but is not restricted to accumul- ation of animal, vegetable or other material: 1) Resulting from the preparation and consumption of edible food stuffs, or 0 2) Resulting from decay, dealing in or storage of meats, fish, fowl, fruits, or vegetables, including the can, contain- ers, or wrappers wasted along with such materials,or 3) Such industrial, domestic and organic solid wastes or residue of animals sold for meat, or 4) Fruit, vegetable and animal matter from kitchens, dining rooms, markets, food establishments or any other place using, dealing in or handling meats, fish, fowl, fruits, vegetables or grains or !, 5) Offal, animal excreta or the carcasses of animals, Icnjl� the-Southern section, within the complete area onttr of Baseline being the- Southern section, 0 and CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials and equipment necessary for the performance of such work, provided, however, that the CONTRACTOR shall not be required to collect any uncontainerized scattered refuse, or garbage unless such garbage or refuse has been thoroughly drained, r wrapped and containerized. All of the work squired of the CONTRACTOR hereunder shall be done in a good, thorough and workmanlike manner. SECTION 2. COLLECTION- EXCLUDED ITEMS. Garbage, waste, rubbish and other materials included in the scope of this Cortract for collec- tion, removal and disposal shall not include the following: any refuse not in authorized containers or any object not easily moved by one man, such as discarded automobile bodies, r= frigerators, stoves, or other bulky or heavy objects, or waste material resulting from any manufac- turing, building or construction operation, manure, offal, waste from • A' any poultry yard or stable, logs, stumps or limbs from trees exceeding ,•K four (4) inches in diameter or three (3) feet in length, sod, dirt or similar material. �� j SECTION 3. EXCLUSIVENESS OF CONTRACT. It in agreed by and between the parties hereto that it is the intention of the parties hereto by the terms of this Contract to constitute CONTRACTOR the sole and exclusivb person, firm or corporation authorized or permitted to collect, remove and dispose of grabage, rubbish, waste, and other refuse matter from all residential premises with the Southgrn section during the term of this Contract. NGP III t %N SECTION 4. DISPOSAL. All refuse collected by CONTMUTOR shall become the property of CONTRACTOR immediately upon the collection thereof, and shall be forthwith removed and conveyed by CONTRACTOR to a lawful place of disposal, which shall be provided, arranged for or furnished by CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR shall pay all costs and charges in connection with said disposal. SECTION 5. LITTER OR SPILLAGE. Should any refuse be spilled or dropped by CONTRACTOR from any vehicle transporting the same or other- • wiso, or if any vehicle operated by the CONTRACTOR shall discharge any fluid, either upon public or private property, it shall immediately be E cleaned up and removed by CONTRACTOR at the expense of CONTRACTOR. SECTION 6. SALE. The sale, transfer, conveyance, merger or other hypothecation of.Ranche Disposal, Inc., or the majority or material :3,14{,h yukoi share of the stock or contr ling interest therein, shall be subject to written consent and approval of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City Council shall within thirty (30) days of such written request, grant or deny (for cause only) its written con- sent. Failure to obtain said written consent shall constitute a substantial breach of this contract and the purpose and intent thereof, and shall further constitute good cause for termination of this Contract. M SECTION 7. COLLECTION ADMINISTRATION. The collection and removal ' of said refuse by CONTRACTOR shall be, at all times during the term of this Contract, performed to the satisfaction of the City Manager who shall have the right to issue all orders directions and instructions to CONTRAt.OR and authorize payment for same from time to time, with respect to the collection, transportation end removal of refuse, the performance of CONTRACTOR'S services herz--nder and CONTRACTOR'S com- pliance with the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga City Code as it - now exists or may from time to time be amended, and CONTRACTOR agrees to comply therewith. Such collection and removal of refuse shall be done in a prompt, thorough, lawful, and workmanlike manner. SECTION 8. FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION. The CONTRACTOR shall collect a minimum of once each week, but can provide additional collection service at additional charge whenever such service is necessary to • prevent excessive accumulation of refuse. SECTION 9. COLLECTION- EMERGENCY VEHICLE. CONTRACTOR agrees to have avialable between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 3100 P.M. an emer- gency vehicle and other necessary equipment to take care of any com- plaints or emergencies which require immediate attention. SECTION 10. ENTERING PRIVATE PROPERTY. The CONTRACTOR shall in no event be under any obligation to enter private courts or places or other private property to make collections tmder this Contract Howevor, if by invitation of the owner or occupant and agreed by the CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR shall assume that the payment and entry way is of sufficient U 1 -5L • strength to support his vehicles without damage either to the premises or contractor's equipsent or man, CONTRACTOR shall have the risht to enter such premises. SECTION 11. RECORD OF NON- COLLECTION. When any refuse deposited for collection is not collected by the CONTRACTOR for sufficient reason, he shall leave a red rag provided at his cost at least 3° s 6" in size, on which he has indicated the reasons for his refusal of the garbage or rubbish, giving reference to the section of City Ordinance or to the secti.)n of City Administration's Rule which has Lean violated, and which gives grounds for his refusal. This information shall either be in writing or by means of a check. system. SECTION 12. CARE OF CONTAINERS. The CONTRACTOR, his agentn and /or emploices, shall not throw garbage or rubbish containers from the truck to the pavement or in any other way, use excessive roughness in handling ti^ ware, but shall use prudent care. However, not withstanding, the customer shall be r.>_,c�sible for the repair and replacement of his own containers. SECTION 13. RECEPTACLES. Each owner or esident or residential property within the City Limits shall place all refuse originating fron such property in proper containers. All refuse shall bm placed within said containers and not upon or around the same except that tree or garden tri=ings not plat ^d in containers may be placed for collection next to said containers properly bundled and tied. 1 50� ARTICLE IV CHARGES FOR COLLECTION SECTION 1. CHARGES. CONTRACTOR shall charge and collect fees established by the City Council according to the schedule attached as Exhibit A for the collection, removal and disposal of refuse from every t1Ea"f7(r -" anC all residential premises within the Southern Section. Every corporation or owner of residential premises as provided in this Con- tract shall pay to the CONTPACTOR the fee extablished therefor by resolution of the City Council. Such charges shall be billed three months in advance and become delinquent two months after said billing. CONTRACTOR may refuse service for failure to pay. CIT' shall not be responsible or liable for the collection or payment of said fees. SECTION 2. EXCLUDED MATERIAL PICK -UP. CONTRACTOR may contract with owners, residents and proprietors of residential property in the Contract Area to collect and dispose of excluded materials on such terms as may be mutally agreeable to CONTRACTOR and the customer concerned. SECTION 3. PAYMENT TO CITY. CONTRACTOR does hereby covenant and agree to pay to CITY, as a business license tax and as consideration for entering intc this agreement, the followings A. A sum of money equal to _percent of the grors receipts of the residential accounts within the Sani.�e+ 2a1 Section of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for collection, removal and disposal services performed by him under and by the terms of this Contract. B. The aforesaid sum shall be paid by CONTRACTOR to CITY on or before the tenth of that month thirty (30) days after the close of the calendar month's service. C. CONTRACTOR shall make all reasonable and necessary efforts• to diligently pursue and collect all fees and ch:xges due CONTRACTOR for rendering said services. Such reasonable efforts vhall include, but not be limited to, resorting to the courts to effect collection. I J5!( SECTION d. LIABILITY INSURANCE. The CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain and keep on file with the City Clerk during the term of this Contract, a valid and unexpirai policy of public liability and property damage insurance in a form approved ly the City Attorney, in the minimum liabiltty of $1,000,000 for loss or damage suffered by any one person in a single accident or c:curence; $3,000,000 loss or damage suffered by more than one person in any single accident or occurrence; and $100,000 property damage in any single accident or occurrence. Said policy of insurance shall cover the CONTRACTOR and all vehicles and employees at any time used in connection with the ser+icts performed_ under the Contract, end such policy shall cover the CITY, its officers and employees, as additional assureds, such policy shall provide that and disposing the garbage an' trash from all residences and premises within the CITY. CONTRACTOR shall engage a certified public accou...ant to prepare and deliver annually on the 1st day of Hay, of each year during the term of this agreement, a statement to the CITY covering all the foregoing facts rolating to his operations. Any rate adjustment must be requested by either of the parties prior to June 1st in any year and must have prior approval by the City Council and will commence on July 1st of any year. ARTICLE MC LE OP CITY SECTION 1. CONTRACTOR shall have the sole right to pick up, gather AJO nC'N and remove refuse generated by every property within the %"them Section of the City Limits until such time as this Contract is terminated. CITY will not let any contract to, or enter into any contract with any other person, firm or corporation for the performance of the services herein ® required to be performed by CONTRACTOR, except as expressly otherwise heroin .provided, so long as this Contract is in effect. SECTION 2. CITY shall protect CONTRACTOR'S rights to such exclusive contract by proper oralnances, a'd reasonable reforcement thereof. — ARTICLE VI • SECTION 1. Any notice that may be given to CONTRACTOR under or with respect to this Contract shall be deemed to have been given when sent to CONTRACTOR by registered or certified mail, postage paid, addressed to CONTRACTOR at SECTION 2. CITY reserves the right to determine, in the exercise of its powers to provide for the public health and welfare, whether technological changes materially affect the level of the n-rvice provided hereunder, and in such case, the level of service hereunder shall be acjusted by CITY and this CONTnACT shall be reviewed and revised accord - L:gly. CITY OF RAN-SO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation i -r w'k Yu kohl CITY RANCHa DISPOSAL, a California Corporation By 15� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: September 19, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubby, City Engineer SUBJECT: OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT Attached for Council review is a letter recently received from the Office of Traffic Safety tentatively approving the City's request for funding of a dual element traffic safety study program. The request was for funds to provide equipment and manpower to perform a Traffic Control Devices Inventory and to establish an effective high accident _ surveillance program. This project will involve the following budget it2ms for grant fundinq: 1 - Assistant Civil Engineer - 2 years $ 35,705 2 - Temporary Part-time student aides - 1 year 10,444 • 1 - Fully equiped van 12,000 2 - Traffic counters 2,600 1 - Radar unit 2.500 S E 63,249 Over and above administrative costs and staff time involved in the development of the grant program, the City will be required to pay one half of the Assistant Civil Engineer's salary for the second year ($12,600) of the program. In iddi- tion, the project agreement includes the following statement of intent: `Me have considered the continuing operation costs of implementing this program and it is the intent of this Co=nity to continue the accident Identification and surveillance system and maintain an updated traffic control devices Inventory.' The Office of Traffic Safety would also encourage the City to retain the pro- ject director in the role of traffic engineer beyond the grant period. That the City Council approve the concept of the grant program and confirm its support to continue the program upon termination of the grant. )6v Office of Traffic Safety Grant Page 2 September 19, 1979 This action will not commit the City of retaining the position of Traffic Engineer but rather a commitment to an improved accident surveillance system and traffic control devices inventory. This action should be continued and developed as a proper function of the Engineering Division regardless of the grant program. Staff will forxard copies of the final draft agreement as soon as conments have been received from the Office of Traffic Safety Respectfully subfitted, B. Hu ngin eer LBH:deb 1l>,1 11 li 9 SrAn W t F*V A-WMk 5 M MJUPMAMW ""KV awme a. YO_WI: n. Gw 49 FICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY sox w,UOUNO m s August 10, 1979 Mr. Lloyd B. Hubba City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: Your proposal requesting funding assistance to implement a traffic control device inventory nas been tentatively approved. Final approval is contingent upon the submission of an acceptable grant agreement. • Enclosed to assist you in the structuring of your agreement are Program Manuals and copies of the project agreement form. Two draft copies of the agreement should be submitted to this office as soon as possible. Signatures are not required at this point. If you have any questions or require assistance, please contact me. Sincerely, AA� ell'7v& PATRICIA A. HILL Regional Coordinator 916/445 -9734 PAH:bg Encls. R a 10 • M E M 0 R A N 0 U M TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Harry Empey SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Computer Service The following is a list of quotes we received for computer service. Xerox Corp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15.636. Annually Municipal Data Systems . . . . . 25.054. ` John Milks 6 Assoc. 48.000. * ' This bid also includes a package for planning (financial impact due to growth). Without the financial package for planning the service is still $30.000. Well above Xerox or M.D.S. Also this figure was given to us informally and the City has yet to receive a formal quote from this firm. • These figures are good for the first twelve months of the contract. In the interest of time and the urgency of the need it is recommended that Xero.r Corp be awarded the bid. 0 HJE:cak 163 10 0 MEMORANDUM TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Harry Emipey SUBJECT: Award of Bid for City vehicles Below is a summary of bids received for the purchase of four (4) vehicles as requested in the budget process. ARENA FORD 4 -door Fairmont 1979 $23,559.53 Delivery - Immediate CITRUS MOTORS 23,885 99 4 -door Fairmont 1979 23,949.15 Delivery - Immediate ROYCE BARNETT PONTIAC 25,719.84 4 -door Phoenix 1989 25,779.00 Delivery - Six Months ROMERO BUICK 24.788.28 4 -door Skylark. 1980 27,125.15 Deliver - Four Months as the lowest bidder. CHADBOURNE CHEVROLET 4 -door Malibu 1980 24,633.59 Delivery - Four -Si?. Months 4 -door Citation 1980 23,885 99 Celtvery - Unknown HARK CHRISTOPHER CHEVROLET 4 -door Malibu 25,719.84 Dolivery - ! 45 days GRAYDON MURPHY OLDSMOBILE 4 -door Omega 24.788.28 Delivery - Four Months Recommendation: Award bid to Arena Ford as the lowest bidder. HJE:cak 16� Mev&o To 5pcVc (-Aa,- C . D D. FRnW 19 %L.L- (-bq*k ", A P SµUJ rS5uE5 AND A%.WPP"UE5 -to YkkE GO-oVTrFt p%hi%A 3r1:aler-A PLStil . S 1N« `ti L RaQ ,,I (.1 UCD QO�ti 1, Ih CN 0 Ttx- CJ Vw t, (M ilH�l r%l- p�1 t`t,..1.Gd. i a.� 19 Z 9 f j wppQ �"tGt1:y5 (na.ie (Tt¢ wrM ✓wacl.n .q,�,,.�.ps .+.,J ...d.�1'duo4rV6 eat d �lbX-- awe --xdat f t� 1 �t rl tza e w.ccfit. r y 1.1c( r w,z w-ctC% Gc .,i & , (0y r(u C( r� lrct � -rye G a -ew+ZtS O-tr rkp� R crre.P X.4r4" �� �L eq 1 y .• �ssue Pk, l_ Priori a7, Sewn a.td SalcceQ F4CAWa3 Onolw.u..,.k esjrWs"% a (JAAaUr� diL aXX .;rJmn db 3g ✓ lnol it tti.s3 .., -P l euc.�+%F S ., Cj, nies cma ate ou •a,.a %F[a fi sPfuv��� to�e�ls T l u LA." I d uGlut �Cd1 Y(.t 1 u+ G itWt¢w P low cm f as teA-.n &_U T&e a,,,,P -44 G CQcca yyct, y� -u /ZW'tLU, Q2UOC�0 of 1zxa - &xchw,,o" dg ��rF2�lktl v e-? P, Erra1,L1►. a �c c� ctti�s �pe.� -ff�` //t�p'caavt0Ny'tt.n� o..Q.Q.oco.tl'e�n �l�I�2t} "a�nnw.�l�tl &--- �^ ^ 711Rw2w r—o l' ( w ot..e. dtoo Ppafcq . t CaM ,wuceve 4wet¢I TL,., 70 % r6 Ti o u.�m.PoeY� aLGxC tie" 4tw�t m n Q d w*-GPAI WW -tr ywa .t to rG• a,aukRO i - ai-'c cai" u, , fl... n nwcew p..,i ndl Q . s- roRIS(� ! F. E -lcra eu.ceyaur✓ C.owu.tiN11t,1 P.Nj -i) •L � -'It -N Cwt >en.l "(l.0 1! tn� ,.. . F` . +/ ` 3- ttw fu.a Cc,�tc�, axo a4d rae, , a.¢� o wflkf� �gctcm -. '7 Y rc.Q poly 6+�i1 `'7 - e4.,pGC Q- co -t��r ,tfi1t,,,4.c.� --0 VII �.GLoCe.;ncHa U U , a St�16 Axcow ,",.,Ai -lam n� C, r7 Ccv, to ofe c t I r ah Jh 7t4A AURA f J 1� e,.y 1755ccE 06. 2•. er,w.,Owa,Q o-E Scl,.eR ea.a�i {icr,�-,a� PA4 0�- a necR�tlaD .n u, .c2 S�,xic,. SMa.+d Cc,fcua, Ae�ictcuo lkd w.R �� M ,• V `ft,Y CUa v I aquu,«crai. �,�a.ofe C'�=+n .tmP= /tt�t.�NC.e yc.t SGC,dee Y of- (0,i< ova OLG�•o tol^ -a -e-, j pc,Jt&j .; C'cw,wor p�oi�c( [�tllc.ev flecawlQ 6 -¢-•✓u �G.�tci eow.s,..T� . Cbtu�..c,Ol�cAt�, -q- AclWdAr(JHS' D& Kcr CCU-. ,rt" �-LeM -6n a- �e+a U--nn ob TAR G1dA: rf ..CA twee g�. S C.4,e ► ' C4 fret GAP �l caT�TC�k/ �a at R.0 c. yl¢ rcuif0.Q y��i1 6d'c 1a�n2ERa+Zr� % ram,?) fte� to cvace , �'da 5....,*-tw 7a /LeCL 4 ` ot, 11 c.c.f 1 .!t t uftev fle�fa}icw, o+•� s�Cy2l /c�yft�itr� /,rcG.�C , 6 y6,fPlic-,j6a+, ei- -C.nWX—u l,.d..ar 6�.�.�u.• -rte ��`� a,.-� �� r�oai olwrza.�1 AA ,ez oa r 7b ftte,%� Cc.rt�„r a C Y" Gvkteuu A.W( ..;r rt.. r.c....c .euuw <u ✓V c[i, a nroAL#0�4 c�riFllo "�„ l —S-, ,�grn w,ua�h� QtutY,.ePu�'r �nLoh't �/�prutNaf7'QL'I p�_it e P -IIK — Sectis„ Z jl� Gcawrr< cil� ft et,5jr- Jzwl;, �C.e AR Ceu,wuu r r y Q,ctrc.E °p"-".x Q<- .xcx'oi -rro tstatcl, vtwctc-6Ad s 4.. c TVi ffIV aS A Pk.na.4 (ice MCAT A- ...ca 70 "c& -to s 11 ate �ittitrHO,..Lt 7G > OIZa.,id+...�t,9 isseSSwaa..,x' SYS�. ccr.C. IA4 by "c G`tz/ Cou., ctI , At - t,:✓.!/at�+7 (�/5) „(f3.}j r Q�. Yw YG.c jdt(S,T /lClif!'�.°I G�Pld'�t�l%Hc.f/F. c Ee 4� D�redn A..a Ca4(40 a a utie�, ja P—. - APPIF � h¢E NIIL� Qu.r�UE _ENouGN - t44VJ- ;v - a Jrgu j m-.� ox-;, 77,x p ass" it Ii t1 -Pixf I tl ru.,;f r s rg �.q (-" S C"-" ro U,atr� yJ �LUtc,ra.a,,.s L,,c,to� 7tu;,� Acu `)' 4���R °3 Ac ts, �' /.i -•�- O /s- arm' El ±53 "-A9--t Q c c.o• rD TGe C. c t, k-t" nQ-,t -f Le M /tea a r., esv 6� S tom¢, ,Q ry 94,7- i2.t Olt .te , fu atr,3¢ d1 acs. a�ynF s l�t,A (;, cti 4r o uaCo,� c`7 liC, . v ( Q�r.�/ - 3SttQ /i10 . 1, � �/P�tr � ��.lcncdwt�n �P SG�tOOP7 —Z_ �! tc..•c✓+arl•�% dC�vooi e, �` �•.t a %i!!eS , ORR s / TLt Cap u8rww.91ca2Na.nC� 4 Arze4..,'7.f atattD ti n tr 4"At 46w en Sc %cep '7. S Gf.a ���I ,.1w.n r,�..aAHAA' 4-& .� 1. ovw;.!+ ty' (J �� L��- !h.%147 /t•t -� ar cat[t�pc cl cte "h�f c✓iir loo X.Y-A:-!sue a.Fg,9 {L.p a.��urafih, o{tAr a �tr`e,t �RN�nYFs Mc fit, t1 S �LIrls,',,, rA fFG ad%-Is a- Lp .n PUrah „l f tam' ]�wcf pra.f-L �,.'� Cie .wo..:t- (,Jwi.w at.na( Le�,1a -. �laulltft3 LttiL l�-dt a.JM(a,EiP . .S �'�t4,� +� S oG -arPO Ltt1' 87cfe..,,t IV rt4 �lecl�t� LLr a fc. a CfilL f-tu d`� ffAAW 7� u.lD Q �t7s -ft. 67 77o1 t..R [t�3 �� G n 704-9 c� 3 6La�o qcA .A✓eat 5 cL to 41 ,rrj u m l,•41 u-w it..0 -�I "v,Q C;7.7 r ✓R'P r4 t..1 tll .a z m c 5 n Z Q Q W no t+ W Y y d 6 F b o .. b y a ro • b r n •\• o ° °c LL i i c> a' b A C 4 O O + O • U I r pr Y ■ O f I o [ b b C 0 � �J o x Y Y Y 4 Yr0 O O 0 V 4 C i b y a ro • b r n •\• o ° °c LL i i c> a' b A C 4 O O + O • U LU J I I o [ b b C o x Y Y Y 4 O O 0 V A • b 6 !1 Y _ U oC pC QC ' � 1GOr ry O t G \ \ LU J I I o Q' Z o x 1V1O1 1MOd u J Rancho Cucamo jN. Chamber o f Commerce 9354 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 81730 TELEPHONE 714 - 987.1012 September 19, 1979 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council c/o James Forst, Mayor P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Ras Agenda - Item 5D Residential Growth Management Plan Dear Mayor Frost: The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce respectfully requests that council consideration of agenda item 50 (Residential Growth Management Plan) be deeerred for a period of two (2) weeks; until the next City Council meeting. we realize the importance of this proposed ordinance to the future of our city and the necessity to act expeditously on this matter, however, it is unfortunate that the proposed Growth Management Plan did not come out in final form until approximately one week prior to the September 12th Planning Commission hearing thereby giving our Growth Management Subcommittee very little time to analyze the proposed plan and come up with recommendations. Also, last minute changes were made in the proposed plan which no one had an opportunity to analyze and consider thoroughly. The Chamber's Growth Management Subcommittee has endeavored to analyze the proposed Growth Management Plan and meet with all interested segments of the community, in order to provide input to the City on the form of the final plan. Our Subcommittee, from the time of the first appearance of the final draft of the proposed Plan, has received numerous communication from various segments of the ccmmunity stating concern that the philosophy of the proposed Growth Management Plan and the residential asrnssment system incorporated therein are inequitable. The Chamber of Commerce proposes to set jp several workshops during the next tw (2) week period which mall include representation by large and small land owners and developers, members of the general business com- munity, the BIA, and other interested members of the community. Through Pago 2 Item SD Growth Management these workshops, we hope to coma up with specific proposals and /or amendments to the proposed Growth Management Plan which have broad based community support and result in a Growth Management Plan perceived by the general community as fair, equitable and balanced to serve the interests and needs of the entire community. The Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce appreciates thn importance of the proposed Growth Management Plan, and the problems associated with devising and implementing solutions to the complex problems of future residential growth. None of us wish to unduly delay the adoption of the Growth Management Plan, however, we feel that a short delay at this time to gut further input and support from the community will result in a Growth Manag�,ment Plan that will be supported by broad based inter- ests in the community and will result in a plan much easier to implement and administer. We thank the City Council and City Staff for working with our organiza- tion and allowing the Chamber to participate and assist in an issue vital to the future of our City. Yours truly, 4kC o_Z7President Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce r BIR baldy view chapter tx* N ."'UN Mxx,atM d southern CaYotnark September 19, 1979 The Honorable James Frost, Mayor and Moobors, Rancho Cucamonga City Council Ran-ho Cucamonga, California Gentlemen: The Baldy View Chapter, Building Industry Association of Southern California, Inc., has not yet tound it appropriate to endorse the propossed growth management plan. However, we do have every good intention to endorse some plan in the near future In our opinion as developers and builders of commercial, indus- trial and residential property, there continues to be some concerns relating to the point rating system as it pertains to equity with varying si -as of land parcels. This can be straight- ened out to the mutual satisfaction of landowners, city officials. the Council and of courae the community. Consequently, we urge the Council not to adopt a first reading of the growth plan on this date, but rather take this opportunity to hear public input. During the next two week period, the BIA growth committee and the Rancho Cucamongd Chamber of Commerce growth committee will be holding work shops in order to make certain that everyone who cares to know, will share the same definitions of terms and understand the same goals for this plan. This is in response to some real concerns by citizens in the community who need to to be certain of what they will be living with. Before two weeks have passed, we will make some specific recom- mendaticns to the Council jointly with the Chamber of Commerce. Please know that we deeply appreciate the work thus for accom- plished by the staff and the Planning Commission on this plan. It is not our intent to substantially alter their recommendations, rather it is our intent to offer a few necessary suggestions which will, in our opinion, help -.he small landowner and builder keep pace with everyone else. WI /O 1150 N Mw�an Aye .;W OQ A 1e X20 xututive Director M Mtufsd ar NM1B W M LBIA tkiind CA 796 (714) 981.299 CITY of RAM610 COCAMoNcA MEMORAM E44 ate: September 19, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: ISSUES AND ALTEMTIYES TO THE GROWTH MANAGIMENT PLAN Since the Planning Commission has reenmmeoded adoption of the Growth Manage- ment Plan on September 12, 1979. several meetings have been held vita various groups and Individuals. Cartel%. lanes were raised at these meetings which merit resolution prior to the adopt•cn of the Growth Management Plan. The issues are as follows: • Priority of allocation of ewer and school facilities Requirement of school certification prior to ewer letter Community Development Director determination of point rating Appeal process is not restrictive enough • Time limits of approved projects Drainage criteria of residential assessment system Street circulation criteria of residential assessment system Definition of orderly development Parka and paths criteria of residential assessment system Shopping center c:lterla of residential assessment system Clarification of design review intent Staff has reviewed each issue and the following are suggested on possible ' alternatives for each. see ISSUE 1: Priority of Allocation of Sever and School Facilities. Section 7 of the Growth Management Ordinance establishes a priority for allo- cation of school and ewer facilities in the event such facilities are unavall- aLle to approved projects. The issue has been raised that In the event a Plan- ned Community receives the highest point total in a review period, that project might obtain all the available allocation for that review period and possibly, for successive review periods at the exclusion of other developments (smaller projects) Alternatives: A Establish a percentage of allocatio:. per reviev period over which no one applicant can receive further allocation For example, during any review period, no one applicant can receive ante than 1R of the available alloca- Tsaues and Alternatives to the Growth Management Plan September 19, 1979 Page 2 tion. This ensures that on one developer will acquire all the available allocations within a review period. B. Establish two categories of allocation: 1) Planned Communities; and �aJH 2) All other development k . k ^; The total allocation would d•a split between the two (e.g ZZ to Planned Cotmunities and YZ to all other developers). Within each category, m one project could receive more than ZZ of the total available. This ensures that both the Planned Communities and all other developers vruld be given a chance to build C All residential development projects which meet or exceed the thrash - hold point limit and receive approval witthhin�a aelualvgle "egnareview Pperiod that participate in a ocn- preferential, cipation to all" solution to the school and /or ester and saver facility impaction problem. acceptable by the school districts and CCwI) will be allocated school and /or sewer and water capacity based on their pareen- tege of participation in the solution Provided that such allocation go to those projects having the highest point ration Each pa al giving no preference contribution shall beobased an an contribution. cion of the whole cints This alternative would eliminate the Isar paragraph on Page 109. D Do not change the Ordinance. Recommendation: Consider all four alternatives and base a decision on the merits of each -11 aa• ISSUE lad 2• Requirement of school cartiflcetion prior to receival of sewer letter. Section 5. Mandatory Criteria, requires that the school certification be met prior to obtaining sever letters. The suggestion has been broached that the applicant obtain sevc- letters first, and then the school letter. Alternatives: A. Do not change th L. section of the Ordinance Schools will issue certi- fication letters only when their requiremento have been met. The losuan.e of school certification letter before a never letter is a statement of City pnlicy that the school issue is paramount at this time in the City's development B. Amend Section 5B, cast sentence, to rcad: "Written certification or evi- dence of Agrecuent: from the school district that the applicant agrees to cooperate and participate in a solution to the school problem (signed by the applicant and rice school districts) be obtained prior to meeting cri- teria "C "." This amendment wu;d further clarify this criteria and at the same time Insure that each applicant will work with school districts to provide school facilities. Issues and Alternatives to the CRowth Managccant Plan September 19, 1979 Page 1 ! This alternative emphasizes the City's position relative to the school issue while requiring applicants to agree to work with the school districts. A final certification would still be required for the issuance of a building permit. Recommendation: Adopt Alternative B e •a• ISSUE NO. 7: Community Development Director determination of the Point Ratings The issue has been raised that Section 7 of the Growth Managemeat Ordinance allows the Community Development Director too much discretion in determining the point ratings. ' Alternativest A. Amend Section 7, Paragraph 1, of the Ordinance to read as follows: "All applications for residential development projects shall be rated by the Residential Assessment System adopted by the City Council." and mend Section 7, Paragraph 5 of the Ordinance to read as follower "Nithin (5) days after the point rating determination, the Community Development Director shall cause a written Donee......" Since the point rating system is a synthesis of the various City departments and divisions review of projects, it is more proper to Indicate that the review to by the system rather than the Director Recommendation: Adopt the change as listed above. ( v, aae ISSUE NO. 4: Appeals are not restrictive enough The issue is that any aggrieved parson, groups, etc., my appeal the point ratings of a project. The possibility exists that builders with lower scores might appeal the point ratings to builders with higher stores to hold up processing, and then, nold up approval of the higher rated project. Alternatives: According to the City Attorney, the City is required by State law, not to be unduly restrictive of any appeals The City must allow any and all aggrieved persons the right of appeal. Recommendation: Leave section an is. y Issues and Alternatives to the Growth Management Plan September 19, 1979 Page 4 aaa ISSUE NO. 5: Time Limits of project approval do oat take into account the possibility of unavailable school or ewer facilities. SectLQ 100 Time Limits of Approval, require expiration of a residential development project after twelve (12) months from data of approval, unless an extension is granted. The Issue is, that if sever or school facilities remain unavailable for 12 months, then projects will automatically expire. Thus, an "implied moratorium" is created, which prevents a developer from acting upon his project. Alternatives: Section 66452.6A of the State Subdivision Hap Act, "stops the clock" (does mot penalize the applicant in regard to time loss) on a tentative tract mop In the event water and ewer facilities are mot available. Shortage of school facilities do mot std oclock" on a tentative tract, thus, the time limits of approval would remain in effect. An applicant may request a time extension by an additional 1S months allowing for a total expiration time of 30 moths. Rrcamendation: Leave Sectice 10 as 1s. i++/ •aa ISSUE N0. 6: The drainage criteria is perceived to be unfair to the smaller Protects. It Is perceived that small projects "lose" 5 points in this category, even If there are an drainage problems. Alternatives: Inez to I- cf- erittrla-1; (1.a, pmlectfies- ad rb8-pol -xe, decrease the point total of criteria 2, (i.e. Heater Planned Facilities) from 8 points to 2 points, eliminate Criteria 3 and allow this category to be additive. This allows smaller projects to gain a larger percentage of points while at the same time net removing the incentive for applicants to pro- vide Master Planned Facilities and /or solve downstream drainage problems. Recomaendatfoe: Adopt this alternative ape ISSUE W. 7: Street Circulation and Improvements is perceived to be unfair to the smaller projects. The issue raised care is similar to the drainage question. A project tht t has no eirculat:an problems is perceived to "lose" 6 points if It is not located on a major, secondary, or collator. Alternatives: Raise the points of criteria 2 (i.e. project will mob create overload of street system) from 4 points to 5 points and raise the points of Criteria 4 (i.e projects on collector streets) from 2 points to 3 points. Recommendation: Adopt this Alternative Issues and Alternatives to the Crowth Management Plan September 19, 1979 Page 5 *** ISSUE N0. 8: The Definition of Orderly Development Is too riatrictive. Presently, the Orderly Development Section allows points for the percentage of the perimeter of the project that abuts existing development. It may not take Into account infill projects %filch may have a vacant parcel adjacent or surrounding it, but for al) intent and purposes will out create excessive strain on Public facilities. Alternatives: Amend Paragraph 2 of the Orderly Development Sections (Section 5 and 6c) to rerd as follows: 'Vwo thirds of a point will be granted for each 101 of the perimeter of the oro)ect that is within 500 feet of existim development or This amendment would require the following amendment of Section 1C(1), Police Protection: "a Project site in vlthtn 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Plannim Commission or Comtunity Development Director on aver 701 of its perimeter (2 points)." "b Project Bite is within 500' of extatim developuent or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Commission or Community D lopment Director between 251 and 701 of its peri- meter 0 _..r . Racommendatlon: Adopt rhi• Alternative *** SSUE N0. 9: Park- and Paths Within the Parks and Paths Section, more emphasis should be given to those dev-,lopments closer to existing parks than proposed future parka. Alternatives: Amend Section 1D, Parks and Paths to read as follows: "5 Over 501 of project is located within 1/2 mile of an existing public park site (2 points). 6 Over 501 of proiect is located within 1/2 mile of a future pro- posed park site (1 point). 7 Over 501 of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile of as existing public park site (1 point) .. Issues and Alternatives to the Growth Managment Plan September 19, 1979 Page 6 R. Over SOS o[ nroj act is loured between 1/2 and 1 mile of a future Proposed publlc Dark site (1/2 point). 1 Recommendations Staff recommends amending Section 10 as stated above. Qf ass ISSUE NO 10: Nafahborhood Commercial Shopping Centers Within the Neighborhood Camnerrlsl Slopping Center, morn emphasis should be placed on existing shopping centers than on planned future chapping centers Alters tives: Amend Section IR, Neighborhood Camcerclal Shopping Canters Co read as follows: "1. More than 502 of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood co+morcfal shopping tenter (3 points). 2 More than SOX of protect is within 2 miles of a nrd fut•ne nef hborhood cooaerctal shopping center (2 Points). 3. More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 all" of an existing neighborhood co ®ercfal shopping center (2 points) 6 Mora then SOX of Project is ber�een 2 and 3 miles of a Planed future nelRhhorhood eommarclal nhoPp Ina center (1 Point). 5 project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood con- t mercfal shopping tenter (1 point) ass ISSUE NO. 11: Clarification of Design Review Intent_ Store is a desire to clarify the Intent of the Design Review Section of the Growth Managemett Plan since m points are assigned to the criteria. It was the desire of the Planning Cnamission that any design review process crested by the City should not dictate a sameness of design from project to project. Therefore by not assigning points to the criteria, the Growth Management Plan merely establishes general parameters by which a review may be made "It is rot the Intent of the Growth Management Plan to dic- tate a particular architecture nor to use certain price materials nor dictate spec it is design solutions It is the Intent of the Growth Haaage- meat Plan to foster creative design solutions." Recommendation: Add the above to Section 2, Design Quality. ORDINANCE NO. 85 AN ORDINP14CE OF TILE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNTr„ DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UNLAWFUL WITH- T'. THE LIMITS OF CITY -OWNED OR - OPERATED PARRS OR OTHER RECREATION FACIL:=ES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Coos ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be un- lawful oT r any person within the limits of any park or other recre- ation facility owned or operated by the City to: (a) Lead or let loose any animal except: (1) Dogs or cats on a leash, lse"kM O,(yQA'. .aw4 which are under the full control of a Parton. (2) Horses, ponied or the lik.1 which are ridden �r .ed on bridle trails or otnor areas designated for such purpose. (b) Possess or consume alcoholic beverages. For the purposes of this Ordinance, the phraso 'alcoholic beverages" includes alrc,nol, spirits, liquor, wine, beer and every liquid or solid containing alcohol, spirits, liquor, wine, or beer, and which contains one -half (1/2) of one percent (li1 or more by volume of alcohol and which is fit for beverage pur- poses either alone or mixed, diluted_ or combined with other substances. (c) Enter or remain between the hours of 10:00 1t Da'4 -/ p.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the following day ex- l. V cept pursuant to a permt issued by the City. dA, 4 .'%; 4iT (d) Light or maintain any fire except in a stove, fire circle or other place provided for that purpose. `l f� (e) Throw, pr j ct or propel any object capable Cc b of cousin rsonal injury or damage to prop - i4..(.-Zt'K� crty except that baseball, basketball, foot- ball and other games where a ball is used may be played in areas designated for such pur- poses. (f) Park or stand any vehicle in other than a designated parking area except putivant to a permit issued by the City. (g) Drive any vehicle other than on roads, trails or driveways provided for that purpose except pursuant to a t issued by the City. (h) Drive any vent a speed in excess of five miles pe h ur (5 m.p.h.). ,. (i) Ride or use playground equipment posted for use by children under the age of four- teen (14) years unless undo' the age of fourteen (14) years. (j) Throw, discard, place or d.spose of any gar- bage or refuse upon the ground or in any place other than a garbage can or other re- ceptacle maintained for such purpose. (k) Bring garbage or refuse from outside the limits of th- park or recreation facility and deposit the same .n garbage cans or re- ceptacles. (1) musical event musical concert r other ntwithoutapermitissuedbythe City (m) Fly la del, irplana _;;cOpt in areas desig- nated for such purpos,,s. (n) Molest, injure or kill any animal or distort its habitat. (o) Play any radio, tape recorder or other tronic sound- producing device at suet ume as to be audible at a distance than fifty feet l50'1. SECTION 2: Any person engaging in any activity declares lawful y s - sections (b), (j) and (n) of Section 1 of this Ord nonce is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by impriso. ment in the county jail for not more than six (6) months or fine not exceeding Five Hundred and no /100 Dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 3: Any persoviolating )ny (of the pr visi ns of sub -sect one a , (c), (d), ( e) or (o) of Section 1 of this Ordinance, after having been once advised that such activity is unlawful, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall (6) punished months oryfi fine exceeding the Five Hundredland for no /100 Dollars Six ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. SECTION 4: The provisions of sub - section (c), (f) and (g) of Sect on 1 o this ordinance shall not apply to City employees who are engaged in the performance of their duties. SECTICN 5: The Community Services Director may adopt rules and regu at ens for the issuance of any permit permitted hereunder. Any such permit shall be issued by the Community Services Department. SECTION 6: The Community Services Department, pursuant to rules an atan ards adopted by the Comrunity Servi is Director, may issue permits authorizing exclusive temporary use i, specified rec- reational areas for groups desiring to engage in specified recrea- tional activities. SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within f f (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Da11y_ Re i, newspaper of general circula- tion, published in-7@1- -City 0 rio, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1979. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of , ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk 101 mayor M E M O R A N D U M Date: September 19. 1979 To: City Council /City Manager From: Marry J. cmpey ! i Subject: Truck Purchase As discussed during the budget process. one of the Items necessary to the operation of the Parkway and Median Maintenance Program Is the purchase of a pick -up truck to be used by the Maintenance St pervi sor It Is requested that the staff bb authorized to obtain quotes and purchase a new truck This vehicle Is to be charged to the Beautification Fund s [am 14 oGa of Council. Per the suggostion of the Mayor, 1 added the Issues and alternatives instead of making reference to them. Therefore, pages 6 through 10 set forth this addition. September le 1979 CITY OF RA. \CIIU r'OCAYOV.A t ITY COIINCIL HIXLTIS Ieylar Meetmy r I TO ORDER ITho regular meotlna of the City Counril was held In the multi- purpo +a room at Carnelian Elementary School, 7105 Carnelian Street, Ranch, Cucamonga, on Wednesday, Septembar 19, le79 The meeting was called to order at 7 :08 p m. by Mayor James C Frost vl,o lad in the pledge of allegiance to the flag. Present: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikels, Palorbo, Bridge and Mayor Frost. Also present were: City Manager Lauren Wasserman, City Attorney Sam Crove, Assistant City Manager Jim Robinson, Cvmunity Development Director Jack Lam. City Engineer Lloyd Hubbs, Finance Director Retry Empty. Community Services Director 8111 Holley Approval of Minutes of August 29, 1979 and September 5, 1979 Motion: Moved by Ylkels, -oconded by Palumbo to approve both sets of minutes Motion carried 5 -0 2. AYNOONCEME`ITS. 1 No Holley announced that the Comunity Services Building should be corpleted by Novembar 14 There had been delays in shipment of materials which accounted for the extra time 2 A special meeting of the Planning Commission at 7:00 p m. on Thursday. September 20 at the Neighborhood Cocunity Facility at Arrow and Archibald. I1. Advisory C=Ittee meting on Thursday. September 20 at 6:30 p a. in the li Library Conference Room. 4 The William Lyon Company will be making a presentation on their special project for Etivanda on October 4 at 1:00 p m. to be held at the Middle School in Etivanda. 5 Mikels announced he vtl. be attending tF SCCAr General Assembly Meeting on October 3 -4 6 Mayor announced he and several staff members had attended a Ltngue of California ilttes'solar rnargy workshop on Friday. September 14 7 Mr Casserman requested I em 4 -c be removed from the Consent Calendar since It had been approved at the prev mw mmetlnR. 1_ CO.MMITTF.E RFPORTS a Advi+or% Cummltlee - none b --,at rl.al Cn-ml. +ton Mr Corczyca reported the Cotsissior was working on a rontivmn+ lnventory of hl +mrlcal +ftes to the area On October 9 they would be nnaldertne an ll +.arlcal landmark doslgratton for the Alta Lora railroad station LCOI —1\ I ALFNDAR 41.rls r.�„•.t.d tt,n< "d" end be removed for furtt r dineussion. city Gnlnell Minutes q.ptumber 19, 1979 '..age 2 \rymva- of Ib_ rrat t . in the rntunt nl >197 MV5 47 'trgtetvr No 19.4 -11/ Iws -,y,t ins, thv_lll� -In rho .r_m•nn[ ,A _S 70,IlUn _n� .mph Ie.nllu Pel n•v hr t lorwa NvJ o I ltv A[h,tnov I,v I.., nu ri•rml•nton to neck quota•r uul nurrhn+e_'•np it) tpPk - Approved in 1979 -80 Rtdget. \pproval o[ Aareemunt with Rancho Cucasnnza t3.ambvr u. G,nmerre - Request for approval of the transfer of funds to the rity for Clio Industrial Specific Plan and auchartre Mayor to sign rgreements. r r \pproval of AAreem.:et with Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Coueeree Request approval and authorize Mayor to sign agreement to t-ansf,r funds in the amount of $47.000 for the purpose of the p:eparation of a Fiscal Impact Model cet October 1. 1979, for public hearing for 7one Chnnge MME CHANGE NO. 79-08 - 4F.RIDIAN - A Change of zone from ,hl (Limited Agriculture) to 4-2 flieavy Industrial) for 18 Sh acres of land located on the north side of Arrow, 1,300' cast „f I -15 Request Approval and authorize flavor to Sion annual ronewal of Inoperation Agreotmnt for Community Development Block Grant Fund t \cce trance of Parcel Map 5194 - The Parcel Map was teetatively ,ppro-.ed by the City Englnecr on July 16, 1979 The land division is located on the south side of Ninth Street west of nellman Avenue consists of 6 2 acres and 8 lots The condition of ipproval required the development of a new street named "Flower" The developer Howard Hurks, has submitted bonds for security as follows: Performance Bond (Road) 517,000 Labor 6 Parerial (Road) 517,000 RSOLLTION W. 79 -76 RESOLITION OF THE CITY LOONCIL OF .TIE city nF RANCHO LL'CNIONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING PARCEL MAD NU4BCR $194 IrENTATf E PARCEL MAP vn 5194; 'cle.se of Bond for County Hinor Subdivision H77 -0703 Northwest terrier of 19th Street and Carnellin Street) t .a rvelocendcd that brie City ouncil dlrtrt the f ty Clerk o nnt1l the Bank of Axrtta to re `ve a' t'e 176.000 letter of redit In river •f Douglas 4unv, fathleul nun, and nougiag orcco Rvic_ ,F _ro.nty 4tnr. tuht,ivl �n 7__0�S'r - -rn. \- I>.I'Inva+t- _• 1 v, 'In,- end Ar,hlb , ldl I t'I•r •. ,it ..,un ' II•.•r t'•e Lit, 'i t n Lnr, t 1-. h• , I w, th. .et lido letter L th. µ q.n• h I rt r rl,.e,ont City Council Nlnutes llnptuober 19, 1979 Ae I n Rceu.utlon f intt nt t•, Fu etc (_Pert lun -f (I env an SIfort - rra,t It 1 a rn,ueeended that it,, tlty (.+vnt It appr..vr the «h,n of In.entlen to v413t0 Reny"' l,treet 391-1 wt ill&• Pnhlt t arlrx for Ortobor 1. 1979 F RESOLUTION SO. 79 -:5 IA RESOLUTION OF "IIE CITY dU,.NCIL oi, THE I In (IF RANCHO Ct'CAMONGA. CotINTY jr SA:i BERNAHOINO, STATE ter l.1LIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS IVTENrIOY TO VACATE A PORTION Or aANY'AN STREET AS SHOV4 04 NAP NO V -001 FILE IN THE OFFILE Ot THE CITY CLERK. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar Motion carried 5 -0 Item "d" -- Mikels questioned section p on the agreement with Sedway,Gooke for Our completion of the general Plan Mr tam explained the consultants worked for and sent ill information to rte city Graff ,• • In turn distributed and re- leaped the Infortmtion The consultant could not liven any Informattun out to anyone except the city Tots: cost Would be S1II.000 Motion MoveJ by Nlkels, seconded by Schlosser I., approve the contract with Sedwav,Cooke for the completion of the General Plan and preparation of t "R and to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement Motion carried 5-0 t.n "f" - J ter discussion, Council concucr,J the approval of the contract L1 with 4KCg for a fiscal tcpact Wdul should be continued to the October 7 meeting with changes in the contract I, include that the consultant would be working with the Council along with the city staff Mr Lam sdggested using the tem "City' instead of city statf Motion: Hovel by Mtkeis, seer-dec by Pal.,—`,o t continue Item to the October 1 resting NoHar ,anted 5 -0 Yr wasperm•n en.o fged Coun:tl to contact it staff with any questions and suggestions betorc the next meeting 5. PUBLIC HCARThbS A. Zoo Change Yn 79 -06 by knptway Inve Stem nt9 A request to change the zoning from N-R to M-1 for property lo, ated on the south aide of Bch Street Letweere Hellman and Archl'•old Avenues Ordinance Na B) before Council for second reading Jack .am presented the stair report He explained the item ha, been held over fret, the August 1st meeting hCraupe the applicant had needed to imo to recotdthe rovereant, condition, and - estrictions This had new leer n,,o- pIighrd L Yavor oper the ,ceting ter public hearing There being no comments, the ,fubllc hearing was cloyed Mntlon Moved ,v Pale -b, at -onded by Bridge to approve Ordinance No 81 and valve entire re.ad,ne Motion „•rled by the fol'ovtog vote: AYES: Schlosser, Nikols, Pal r -1-r 7ridge, Front %OES Yon, ABSENT: None Title and number read `♦ -I +errin City Council Minutes S,•ptember 19, 1979 page . ORII ANF.E RU 81 (aecund reading) AN ORDINANCE of THE CITY LOONCII ,IF THE CITY OF RANCH0 CUCs@R1NGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL WHIMS 209- 171 -07 AND 209- 171 -20 FROM M -R TO M -1 FOR 18 75 ACRES I1)LATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8111 STREET BETWF.L`) HELLMAN AVENUE AND ARLHIIIALD AVENUE Ordln.Ince No. 70 -5 before Council for second rending An ataondoont to the .rI unal historic preservation ordinance to include designatio^ of points .•t -ii+torlcal interest Hr Holley presented the staff report 'Ln.•r opened the meting for public hearing There being no cotvicents, the ,• Iring Was Closed. 11•ti •n: Moved by Mlkels, seconded by Palumbo to approve Ordinance No 70 -B and +.n otire reading Motion carried by folloving vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels. h.,, erldge, Frost NOES: None ABSENT None Title and nelebrr read by Iva, r^tn ORDINANCE N0. 70 -8 (second reading) AN OR 7(NANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ME CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM BA:A. CALIFORNIA MENDING ORDINANCE NO 70 CREATING AN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION CLSLMISSION TO ACT IN AN ,DVtSORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDL\TI? CATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, TMWFURES AND SITES AND TO IDENTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICA SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA. - ,t- ._•nllnance No. 85_Ffore Connctl for second reading An ordinance daclpring ,t ,in eta to he onlm ful vithin public parka in the City of Rancho t . ^on:1 Staff report by Bill Holley I r o,,,nvd the eteettng for public hearing There being no cow_ nta, the ,ring vas closed ^. Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palonbo to approve Ordinance No 85 I . tv, entire reading Nation carried by follovinq vote: AYES: Schlosser, 11 1+ Ilonbo, Bridge, Frost NOEb None ABSENT: None Title and n=b ^r 1 W.lsarman ORDINANCE NO 85 (second read ng) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCYMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLYRING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE CN- LAVFUL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CITY-OWNED OR - OPERATED PARRS OR OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES ANT PROVIDING PLNALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF -O, _,rdinlnce Nt. 86 before Coum it t -r flrlt rending An ordinance rstahlish- .• th, rv.ldentt:.l grttvth vanalive nt plan ani ResolLrtlon No 79 . Whtrh L I d,I tslu, . real Icntial IvarsCtx•of rltinq cvaten ••Iv.•r •rtn[nd tl•vr.• v­nld n,•t h. I firm reading Chia e• -Inv Council ,o,tld ..I n o tnpnt and t'..•n t,--v hatk I Itr t rca„ing later Ir .n oade the -t II prey, nt Ilion utllntng the rr th n.lnagocent plan and ton• hdn ;ry Wnirh hurl bt,•n node In t,, -.11, ,ant, 'At,, staff had 'et With .vveral group• during the Week, Ind 'Ire I.n Ilse presented a list of lesues Ind Ilternrtlucs to the Council vhl." had .nne ..ut of thew -ertiugs N City Connell Minutes September L9, 1979 Page 5 a• tins was opened ro G„mrll to ask, stair ya•atloiit There were none. Mayor ailed it recess rat 3:0 It a. The meet Ing ra••onvrrw0d at 9: R) m, with all raahara of the Council and "tiff pr,•svnt Mavor iprned the meeting for pubs La hearing. rMerman grmpel, Chalrai of Cho Planning Cnemleslun, made somu Introductory comments giving %,shoo ba,kxru.md to tho xnvth e.nIgament plan. Tonv Cover, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Cu®aree, requested Council to tablo the item for at bast two weeks to allow the Chamber time to look at the amendments and prooler, Lewrd i•arcryca, Chairman of the Historical Coromission, stated that In section 9-4 the werd, "hintorimQ," should be added. Kan ❑Nils. BIA, also requested that Council table the Item at least two weeks In order for them to look at the recommendations made by the utaff Bob Young, representing the Ontario- Chino Board of Realtors, requested a cop - tinunnct, in order to vork with the Chamber of Comhae-cc in eval,..ting the recomaenda- tlons Count 11 considered whether to hear public Input on the Rasolutlon at this time It wa. decided to proceed, and Mayor .lased the public hearing on the ordinance and uPened thv pu1•I1, hearing on the Reanluti.en Sharon Ropere amber n• the AI¢a arta Advisory Comf -Ire, suggested a varantee systum ae ln,luded Ken 11,111% sta[ad the, also vero concerned in the area of warantees and that thin was ' +• of national .oncern T'.here was a national insurance prograr available and tL k),11 groups had been invited to Join Fie stated that lotal.v the Lewts 11or,.. w, the beat warantee phugraa and asked Mr Ralph Lowts to explain his prodra- Mr 1wls suggented that waranters net be 1 part of Vhe point system, lie pointed •.n that ncc HOW (Hcme Owners Warantee) program was vcr. expensive for the builder. he s,bl .1s organiratlon tried to stand behind their products for a reasonable length : time I•.e p•tbli ,paring was closed M••tl•n Mo,ed b Schlosser, seconded by Paloabo o ,,tin.e Cie public hearing the uctnher I rxeting . +n Ordinance No 66 and gcsolutlon No 79 -74 ,oancil deliberated whether to gt,c the ordinance first reading and wait on the resolution This would 6fvc them additl.rkai time to work on the problems before the enabling ardlr.nnce want Into effect Mlkels suggested that Council should give s,me input to staff se the revisions in the ordinance and resolution would reflect the wishes of the C, a 11 Palomb, withdrew his second an the original motion Call was made for another second Mavor Frost seconded the motlun The mutton to •ontinue the public hearing to the prtuber 1 meeting or. the Ordinance and Resolution was approved by the L fc I lowing voty: AYES: Srhl.asor, Paloebo BrWge, Frost SOES: Mikels (he felt the erdin,nre rould pass the fir% re,dlne with ozonic dtncusslon) Ylkcls snggv tpd r..re modtfiratl"ns 1r +cttLm•. 9 -' ,nd 9-9 if the Resolution Settl••s B -2 dlouhd he wo,Jed. 'it,, h.lp school facliltles are provl t.•J " Se, tl •n 6-9 "t„ encourage .h..nl 1 he added Mat ion 'Inv.•d by `!tkela, seconded by P,lo•:ha to uhrrove the ahove chhnges in Se.tI +ns 1H, .nd 'a -9 Motion r.,rrt...I by fall vin vote• AYES brhlolspr "iKe S. Pulemh,•, Nh.l,,.•, .:nd Frost NOES: axon. ARSI %(: %one It ruunrll Minutes tvnher 19 t9;9 'Ill I +.pu•stlamed tlw •rder ui b -a and h -1 Ile loll tht order should he , .- r o.l dh addr ad q.0 mm vsr the •stion of „h,•thtr - •ltm,•nt to in s x• ves.nnt II`- I t ft re•verw,ble• I, nu , Ilv It Coro• v Th•• , Itv tttornrV vaW iv .00ld he •nnditlunal State ,[I three had to he net an.war, 41k, 1, Ild not pursov the Isn-Ie Ill. I+ quewttoned the cording in Section 7 -A Rtvor surwo +tod thv section Inc r.•vo.l.•d Mikels expressed toncern that ., project of I•w +r points could - project with higher points atmply because of the posit Len of it InC he,•n delayed from another period `lotion: `lovod by Mfkels to have staff revise Innguagf to entire scrtlun 7 -A nd hring hatk to Council 41k. 1. gnestloned Jack lam if the staff had exhausted all alternatives in the ,swnv 4r. lam pointed not there win another alternative to have all mplt atlons, even those coming from a prior period, be treated equally within th ,t -.rind It would be by total competition within each period P ,l a -hr suggested thit Council sit down In n work session to work cut these i..its 41kele said Council should give staff soma direction on '.he ordinance n1w :r:'ce expressed that they should go Ulth a total competition plan Council nncerrvd to have staff come back with alternatives for the underlined sections 4ikely withdrew his motion •tiv.tr bon vent over the issues and alternative list which had been presenteJ irlt r ,v Mr Lam Louneil concurred with the mayor's comments which were: IS,UF. 1: Priority of Allocation of Sever And School Facilities I flea 7 of the Crwth Managtaent Ordinance establishes a priority for -,location of school and sever facilities in the event sucl, facilities trt• - -navailable to aporoved projects The Issue has been raised that in to, went a Planned Community receives the highest point total in a review ertod, that project mightobtafn art ,c available Allocation for that , v period and possibly, for successl•e review periods at the eacluelon , ,ther developments (smaller Projects) Iternattves: P Pstobtish a percentago of n /location per review period over which no o applicant an receive further alloaatlon For example, daring any ,low period no ono to••llrnnt can recoiv, more thin XX of the available -Ilo•atlon This enures that no one developer will acquire all the ivallable allocations within a review period I Establish two categories of allocation: (1) Plan, d Commmities; and (:) All other development :•h• total allnrf[ton would be spll; between the Ike (e g X: b Planned -•+,atnnitien and Y: to all ether develnpers) Within each category, no ne protect tm,id n calve more than /.i of the total o-allable This aeons that both the Plir,.•d Cumunities and all otho. developers would I lvrn a ah into to h.IIJ L %If resldentltl del ^1,. , -tt rroj.•, tc whl `, -cot a ,xreod the thresh - �•�LI point It,, I Ind r, n P -rte PI wlthlr I- review perind that fret spat ^ t non -fire, r -fl non -a•xe lush v.• n Pl partl•!pati.•n to ill" .v lol ton th •t I'— it in, or water aid +ever I vlllty lmp.nttnn pro - hI o, u"eptu, hl the ., t ilitri, fs .Ind CIM w,ll be allocated t.hool mdfnr .ever Ind wit••, -y, if. ined on their pvr.entage of participation In the +ol --tlnn Provl I..I t•., -nrh ,Iitastion %hill go to those prnjotts hnvinc the hlghv t pole[ t it feuh part fr In in tw .ant [button Ahab he h.lsed on in t•qual proport I n •,I the whole civtng no prcferan„ [,, size or Iinanrldl contribution Mitt alterri would vll�lnnte tht• Ifit paragraph in Page 109 of the agenda packet 11ty Council Minor,, h.•nn•nbar 19, 1979 P i u• D. D.. nut .hang, 1I,v UrJ L.amv Staff netts •ndat tuns: l,unvlder all sir alternative" and bise a de, Islon on the m ,its of ,neh 11r ruunt I had prevlonsiv ngrecd thts Section 7 -A needed t.. I,- rcwnrked i ISSUF. _D 1: gegulreront or Srhnol Certification Prior to kecelval of Sever Ia L[,•r C Section S. Mandatory britert3, requires that the echoes certification be net prior to obtaining sever letters The suggestion has burn breached that the applicant obtain sever loiter, first and then the a.hool letter Alternatives: A. Do not change this section if the Ordinance Schools will Issue certl- flc:-ton letter, only when their req•lrements have been met The Issuance of school certification letter be °ore a sever letter i3 a statement of City policy that. the school Issue is paramount at this the in the City's development B. Amend Section 5 -8, last sentence, to read: "Written certification or evl- donee of Agreements from the school district that the applicant atirces to cooperate and participate In a solution to the school problem (signed by the applicant and the school districts) be obtained prior to •maling criteria 'C' " This amendment would further clarify this criteria mid at the same time Insure that each applicant will wo rk with school districts to p-.ovide school facilities This alternative emphasiren the City's position relative to the school Issue while requiring applicants to agree to work with the school districts. A final certification would still be required for the issuance of a building permit Staff'. re oc!cnd.tfon: Adopt Alternative B. Council had discussed this issue earlier in the meeting. ISSUE SO_ l: Community Development Director dertevmination of the Point Ratings. The Issue has been raised that Section 7 of the Growth Management Ordinance allows the Coeaunity Development Director too much discretion in determining the point ratings AlternatLvei: A. Am. d Section 7, Paragraph 1, of the Ordinance to read al follows: "All nppl.catlons for residential development projects shall be rated by the Residential Assessment Svsten adopted by the City Council " and amend Section 7, Paragraph 5 of the Ordinance to read as follows: L "Within 5 dav, after the point rating determination, the Corsunlry Develop - pent Dir,•tnr ohall aase a written notice s Since the point rating system I a vvnthcgi, of the vnrlom.g fi y departan., and d1vl3lons review of projects. it I. r.r, prover to Indl.ate that the review I% by the y,tom rather than the Diry for Stab '+ rc��nd.rt ,on Adopt the .Imnge tg Ilstvd ibove Council rnncurred with the recommendation Cit, Crunch Hinutes ,ova �mor 19, 1979 •.fl'I_ \ll. 4: \d+l•t•alx yore not ro.[rlrt lt_n en••nrih no. Ix „u Ix that any aggrlevcd P,•r.•• Croup.. 't , my -wival the print ,tinµ. of n pro Iv,t The poxsib",ty voti.t•, ti,at but Worn with lower nr,•s might nppeal Clio puint ratings r„ boil tiler, with higher xcnrea to 101.1 up proeea.ing. and then• bull np apprnvel •u the hither -aced project \It.rnatives: b .•rdtng to the City Attorney, the City Is required by Stnte law, not to he unduly rc.trictive of any appeals The City must Allw, Any And 'it tggrteved persons the right of appeal recommendation: Leave section as is Cnune Ll concurred with the r..o- mendation. :%fUt CO. 5: Time Limits of Project nuprov.,I do not take into account ;a Lossibtlity of unavailable school or .ever fact Littes f••.tlon 10, Time Limits of Approvu, require expiration of a residential tevrlopment project after twelve (12) .onths from date of approval, unless in .-%tension is granted The issue Ss, that if sever or school facilities r.�itn unavailable for 12 months, then projects will automatically expire noun, an "implied moratorium” is created, which prevents a developer from +sting upon his project 111,•rnatives: Section 06652.6A of the State Subdivision Map Act, "stops he -lock "(does not penalise the applicant in regard to time loss) on a tentative tract map in the event water and sever fncllities are not tvrllable Shortage of school facilities do not "stop the clock" on a tentattve tract, thus, the time limits of approval would remain In of set. to ipplicant may request a time extension by an additional 18 months allowing for A total expiration time of 30 months ,lotion rec,.mendation: Leave Section 10 as is Council concurred with this rec Per, endation ISWE SO. 6: The drainage erltert, is perceived to be unfair to the smaller n+j nets :t is perceived that small projects "lose" 5 points to this categor,, even It there are no drainage problems Alternatives: Increase the poirt total of criteria 1, (1 o. project has idequate drainage), from 5 points to 8 points, decrease the point total of riterta 2. (i.e. Hauer Planned Facilities) from 8 points to 2 points, .•iimin to Criteria 7 and allow this category to be additive This allows ,mailer projects to gain a larger percentage of points while at the .any time not removing the Incentive Tor applicants to provide Raster Planned Facilities and /or solve downstream drainage problems ot.itf's recommendation: Adopt this alternative Council concurred with 1` tar err omtxnAatton It i� M I ltv council Minutes September 19. 1979 Page 9 ICSVI %0. 7: ltrrc_t fir_. ul ulnn lml Im•,•rov� rrnty Iv 1.. rro %v-.I to he not otr t.• rh�_nal lcr Lnl. Is The Issue raised here Is similar t, the IollnnRt q"evt /on A project that Im% no circulation prohl -es Iv perceived n) "Inst•" 6 polntn If It Is not lo. .lted on .I major, eccondxrv. ..r collector j ,alternatives: grilse the Points of criteria 2 It c project w111 not create "rerload of street systc,O from 4 points to 5 points and raise the potnts of Criteria 4 (t . projects on collec)•rr streets) tram 2 points to 1 points $1 -11's recomrendatinn: Adopt this Alternntive Council concurred with this C recommendation ISSUE t:0. 0: The Definition of Orderly Devnlopment is •oo restrictive. Presently, the Orderly Development Section allwt points for the percentage of the perimeter of the project that abuts existing development It any not take into account lnflll projects which may have a vacant parcel adjacent or surrounding St, but for all intent and purposes will not create excessive strain on public facilities. Alternative.,: Atxnd Paragraph 2 of the Orderly Development Sections (Section S and 6c) to read as follows: "Two thirds of a point will be granted for each 102 of the perimeter of the project that is within 500 feet of existing development or within 500' of This amendment would require the following amendment of Section IC(1). Police Protection: 1 "a Project alto is 1.1thin 500' of existing development or proposed develop - mett that has receivel approval by the Planning Commission or Comaunity Development Director on over 702 of its perimeter (2 points) " "Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received npprovnl by the Planning Commission or Community Develop - •tent Director between 252 and 702 of Its perimeter (1 point)." Staff's recomenditL=.. Adopt this Alternative. Council concurred with staff's recommendation ISSUE S0. 9: Parks and Paths Within the Parke and Paths Section, mare emphasis should be given to those developments closer to existing parks than proposed future parks Alternatives: Amend Section ID. Parks and Paths, to read as follows: "S Over 502 of project is located within t/2 mile of an existing public park alto (2 points) L 6 Over 502 of project Ss located within 1/2 mile of a future propose' lark site (I point) 7 Over 502 of project Is located between 1/2 and 1 mile of an existing public park site (I point) g Over 502 of pre).•ct I s located between L 2 and l mile of a future proposed pubic park site (1/2 point) " Staff'., rerormendattnn: Amending Section !0 as stated above Council concurred wit.. the recommendation City t.auncil Man„trs N.-Pte- rr 19, 1. e PIa• 10 I,SKF_LO_I0 _Not •ly .bnrhu.xl 1_,r.e. r, t tl SI...ppi nom• t.mn_ra ithln the Yulghhorhond Cumorctal Shnpping l.•nt, r, n•tre rrybn +Is aIionl.l be I I .I m existing shopping renters than nn pl mntd '.start• +hoppin.t .enters III rn.Itives: Amend Section Ir, geighburh.nd Ctnmu-rt lrl Shopping Centers I.•td in follows: ' Yore than 302 of project Is within 2 miles of an existing neighbor- ' t.x.d .omoercial shopping center 0 points) r `lore than 502 of project with within 2 miles of a planned future ,clehborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) 'lore than 502 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing .tthborhood com.mrclal shopping center (2 points). 'lore chin 502 of project Is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future oborhood comtaorlcal shopoing center (1 point) I Project is acre than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial 'hopping center (1 point) +cll concurred with the recommendation to amend ectlon III as above ISSCE SO. 11: Clarification of Design Review irtent fhcre is a desire to clarify the Intent of the tv:sign Review Section of the Cr.evth Management Plan since no points are assigned to the criteria It va+ the desire of the Planning Coralvston that nny design review process .rooted by the City should not dict.,te a assume is of design from project to prolert Therefore, by not assigning points to the criteria, the Growth 'Itnagement Plan merely establishes general perimeters by which a review - L., he made "It is not the intent of the Growth Management Plan to dictate I •'articular architecture nor to use certain price materials nor dictate +p.•rittc design solution It is the intent of the Growth Management Plan I,. :.,ster creative design sot Irian, " r.tr f'+ ragam•,pdatt on: Add the above to Section 2. Design Quality Council mrnrred with staff's recommendation ' ..r alled a recess at 10:20 p m. Meeting reconvened at 10:35 p m. with all .n. 11 and staff members present STAFF REPORTS '.valDetermination for Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association. A request ...r •eotng determination as to whether or not the Popoff Association use is t. L.ran lt• in the R -1 zone item was continued from the September 5 meting rirr• Ilncan, Senior Planner, presented the staff report lie pointed out the ., w.os to determine whether the project was to be considered as a "church" .•u •I ...uld be compatible with the R -1 zcntng or a "commercial venture " The :I•,nl, tormisglon had determined by a split vote that the use would be I I ,r to a Church The concern was that perhaps this use was a comme rcial L ti :It which had a church and was not appropriate for that crea 9.a ion: `loved by nridge, seconded by Palombo that the Peter Popoff Evangelistic ...• tt L.n wa+ characterlatfc if a church activity and ron,larent with the .I -1 inn. City council Minutes September 19, 1979 Pate I l Jpuµlds Scott, a Clar,•aant attornev representlnµ the Papeff F,im'jitten, addressed the Cuuncil Motion: Tho original motion that this wi. chrra,teristl, of t church ncttvltr end consistent with the R -I one w.ls deleat,d by the 1,ll.swing vote: AYES: srtdge, Palombo NOLS: Schlonser, Mikvly, Frost ABCLVT: Vane Motion: Novel by Ytkels, seconded by Schlosser to table the Item and to reconsider at the October 1 meeting Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Frost NOES: Bridge, Palombo Mr Scott asked this to be changed to the October 17 meeting since he would y be out of town October ). i Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to change the date that the Item would return to Council to October 17 Motion carried by following voter AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Frost NOES: Palombo, Bridge 6H. Proposal for nn ordlnnnce providing for the control, collection, and disposal of refuse Question before Council was should the City of Rancho Cucefmongo franchise refuse operators (Larry Empey presented the staff report i No Wasserman made some additional comments on the theory of open competition He also d pointed out that: (a) rates were determined by the County, therefore, all ,! companies have the same rates; (b) city would have authority to help solve complaints; (c) some refghborhoods have different companies serving them a day apart; (d) rate increases are determined by the Board of Supervisors This u type of decision should be made at the local level; (e) suggested that all funds derived from this venture (approximately $25,0011 per year) be earmarked for the parkway problems; (f) need to insure an adequate level of service I Mr. Wasserman stated that the Alto Long Advisory Subcommittee had discussed the problem and made a recommendation that we leave the refuse service as is and rot franchise The following addressed the Council: Adam Sllney, Rancho Disposal Sharon Romero, Alta Loma Advisory Co®ittea Fred Gentile, Rancho Disposal Jack Avaklan Yukon Disposal Francis Beet, Best Disposal. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palmetto to recommend approval of franchis- ing of residential refuse operators at a rate of five percent out of gross receipts lnst met staff and city attorney to evaluate the proposed agree- ment and schedule the proposed ordinance for a public hearing on October 17 and instruct staff to study refuse collection rates in San Bernardino County and subait a recommendation to Council Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palomho, Bridge NOES: Schlosser, Frost 6C. Office .f Trnflic Safety Or +nt Report was presented by city engineer �! Lloyd Hubbs Motion: `loved tv 4lkels, seconded by Palombo to approve Lou concept of the grant progra,, a. 1 onflrm itA support to continue th? program upon termination of the grant Axton carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palumbo Bridge .nd Frost NOES: None It , -n.11 Minutes 1979 4LLIL I•ld f,g connntrr N,II report by Flo in. .• Ol re. tur Ilar, v i.•t,w It W liven rervI ved tt• expand ,nd ilid.,tr the ,ampot v vrrvlea•e osrd i „mv Dep,rtevot Pit., had Oven , had W.-led Ite, V„otvw were nacivcd ,. nan "nfon ,s foll,wn: r.,. tarp t15,1436 mnually 4nut.tpal Data Svstems $15,054 " I 'o 611ka d Assoc $48,000* •',Id nIsn Included a pa ^kage for panning. ,Lit „n: graved by Ntkela, seconded by Palombo to award the blot to the Xerox r•,•r,tinn for computer services for $15,636 annually Motion carried by ,dII v,nc: AYES: Schlosser, H1Cels, Pal"be, Bridge Frost NOES. None _ .,ward o' bid for city vehicles Staff report by Harry Empty, Finance .,t'r Item was a budgeted Item. Bode had been - eceived from seven companies r ,,,it urtemobtles Companies were: Arena Ford, Citrus Motors, Royce Barnett •t,,,, Romero Buick, Chadbourne Chevrtlet, Mark Christopher Chevrolet, Graydon rnnv oldsmoblle Arena Ford was 1west bidder of four 4 -door Fairmonts at I,,i9 it ,b,tl is 'loved by Brit, , seconded by Palombo to award bid to Arena Ford for -or ...tonobiles at 511,559.53. HOCIOr carried by tollowing: AYES: Schlosser, I,.,L, Palombo, n.tagc. and Frost NOES: None - ItY 1TTOR.VCY'S trP. RTS I It, Attorney reminded Council the time was quickly passing, and the issue •.i ,.r the city clerk and city treasurer were to be appointed or elected d.•d ., he made Discussion followed „ ,It ,ttnrney said he would go ahead and draft up the necessary papers needed .a me issue on the ballot to haw these positions appointed, then staff ,• .•un, it could do_ldod • 1. 11 SINESS •,lesser made the comment that the article in a recent newspaper regarding v lty hall was premature since Council had not made any decisions 'lavnr made the following comments regarding the recent fire in Etiwanda: - Lctters of commendation should be sent to Sgt O Rourke and Chief Cce for the excellent job In coordinating the efforts of the different igencles involved - Acknowledgements of servtre should be sent to adjoining agencies such in the fire departments of Ontario and Upland - rnergnnry contat t list should include school superintendents In ase I , schnol might he needed as an vvaccat Lon center - Veed for hrtter Ilsastcr auarene w Perhap+ sorw special Council neeting In eurle Vovr -brr to apprine Council at bounty and State nrgnnlzatlnns Whi.h Would be involved Jurinx disasters - have staff look Into some alternatives In rnoting materials which would not be [ladab le Etpe,ialit for the high fire areas - Request tatr to make recormnendatlons to prevent this tvpe of ftru In the future Special dttenticn to the windrow aid weed abotemvn prahlems an private proterty 7 L Clta Council Minutes S. ptonb, r A. 1979 P.t¢e I1 \DJDUR \NFYL `in U.w: Moved by Palumbo, srcondcd by Srhlanser to nd)uucn thu m vt:Lng Motion .rr,,d 5 -0 The meeting ad Junrned at 12:55 a m Itcsperttully subm[tted, Bevcrly Authtlet Deputy City Cl.rk September 5, 1979 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MiNUTCS Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. r The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the multi- purpose room Iat Carnelion Elementary School, 7104 Carnellan Street, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, September 5, 1979 The meeting was c +lled to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor James C Frost, who led in the Pledge Allegiance to the Flag Present Councilmen Mikels, Bridge and Mayor Frost Also present ware: City Manager, Lauren Wasbcman; City Attorney, Bob Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hobbs; Community Services Director, 8111 Holley; Secretary furry Whitney. Absent: Councilmen Schlosser and Palombo. Approval of Minutes: Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve Minutes of August 15, 1979, regular meeting Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) • 2 ANNOIJHCEMENTS. a Councilmen Mikels reported on elements of appeal to Cal Trans by San Bernardino Associated Governments concerning highway projects within the City b. Announcement was made of Planning Commission meeting concerning Lyon Company proposal for residents of Etiwanda Date to be determined - c Mr. Wasserman announced a tilm to be shown at the City of Montclair Council Chambers Film from South Coast Air Quality Control District concerning vehicle mibslon testing program d. Me Wasserman reported on his attendance at recent SANaAG meeting A bummary of that meeting was given concerning status of Foothill Freeway, Air Quality Management Plan and the Federal Clean Air Act. c. Mr Wasserman announced 2 Items to be added to Agenda Itm 6 -P, request from Planning Commission to set Public Hearing for Growth Manrgment Plan for September 19, 1979 Item 6-Q, request from staff for authorization or trip by Community Development Director and City Engineer. f. Council approval to . iraw Itm 6 -0, request fur Council review of Planning Commission zoning determination g Mayor Frost announced that tonight's meeting will be adjourned to Saturday, p� September 8, 1979, 8:30 a.m at which time Council Members will participate In tour of Cucamonga County Water District facilities. h Advisory Committee will meet September 20, 6:30 p.m , at the Library meeting room. 1 Historic Preservation Commission to meet Tuesday, September 11, 7:00 p.m at the Library meeting room 3 COMMITTEE REPORTS. n. Advisory Committee - none b. Historic Preservation Commission - Chairman Corczyca reported to the Council or the Commission action of August 14 concerning submittal of list of 8 previously designated historical entitles located within the City for formal recognition by Council City Council Minutes September 5, 1979 Page 2 4 CONSE %T CALENDAR. 1!otlon: Moved by Mlkels, secondwl by Bridge to approve Consent Calendar Notion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) a. Approval of warrants in the amount of $188,534 63 Register No 79 -9 -5. b Authorization for VISA Cards for Community Development Director and Assistant City Manager Cards to be used only In connection with official City business. C Approval of designation of Mayor as City's voting delegate and Mayor \ pro tem as alternate for League of California Cities Annual Conference to be held in September d Refer claim against the City for $1,250 to $1,510 by Charles B Jones and Gayle E Smith to City Attorney for handling. c. Right of Way Certification FFSOLUTIGN No 79 -70 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CITY ENGINEER TO CERTIFY LIMITS OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. f Acceptance of Parcel Map 4912 - eight parcels as a division of land located on the northeast corner of 7th Street and Archibald - Vanguard - Builders, Inc PE.SOLUTION No 79 -72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO _ CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP No. 4912. (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP No 4912) - g Acceptance of Parcel Hap 5325 - acceptance of bonds, agreement and parcel map for lndustr 1 development, 9 acres and 5 lots, northwest corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue Performa,._e Bond (Road) $10,000 Labor 6 Material (Road) 10,000 RESOLUTION No 79 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP No 5325 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP No. 5325) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IHIPROVEME TI SECURITY h Tract 9378: Release cash staking deposit to Regency Equestrian Estates In the amount of $900 1 Tract 9373: Release cash staking deposit to Regency Equestrian Estates in the amount of $1,080 j Tract 9381: Release ca..h staking deposit to Lensy /Wllahire Properties in the mount of $3,200 k. Tract 9382: Re ease cash staking deposit to Lensy /Fletcher Homes in the amount of $2,100. 1 Tract 9634: Release cash staking deposit to Chavanne Realty, Inc In the amount of $1,750 m Tract 9337: Release cash staking deposit to Wlnnwood Estates Development in the amount of $3,800. n Tract 9381: Release bonds to Lensy Development Company, Labor and Material (suer) $20,500 Labor and Material (water) 20,000 City Council Minutes SOPLCmbcr 5, 1979 Page 3 o. Tract 9782: Release bonds to Loney Development Company Labor a Material (sewer) $20,000 Labor 6 Material (water) 26,500 p. Tract 9274: Release bonds to H.J Brack 6 Sons Performance Bond (landscaping) $14 000 r Performance Bond (Storm Oral:.) 18,000 Iq Tract 9617: Relsase bonds to M.J Brock d Sons Performance Bond (landscaping) $ 7,530 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS A Ordinance No 70 -A (first reading) - an amendment to original Historic Preservation Ordinance, No 70, to include designation of "Points of Historical Interest " Report by Bill Holley. City Attorney presented the following change In wording for Section 1: "Section I Section 8 of Ordinance No 70 is hereby mended to read as follows:" Mayor Frost opened the meeting for Public Hearing There being no comment, • Mayor Frost closed Public Hearing. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to incorporate City Attorney's suggested change in Section 1, and to waive entire reading; further, that September 19, 1979 be set as date for second Reeding. Motion carried by the follow cg cote: AYES: Mikels, Bride and Frost. HOES: None ABSENT: Schlosser %nd Palombo. Title and number read by Mr. Wasserman - ORDINANCE Rio 70 -A AR ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4;ONGA, CALIPOR.HIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE No 70 CREATING - AN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMOQSSION "C ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECT: EJENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO INIENIIFYPERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. B Ordinance No 85, An Ordinance declaring certain acts to be unlawful within public parks In Rancho Cucamonga Report by 0111 Holley Council discussed the possibility of Ordinance being too detailed and restrictive Me Holley reported that Ordinance should be applied selectively so that present abuses occurrirg to persons and park properties may be curtailed Council, staff and City Attorney discussed various changes to sections of the Ordinance Mayor Frost opened the meeting for Public Hearing. Those offering comments: Herman Hempel and Douglas Hone. Discussion followed. There being no further comment, Mayor Frost closed the Public Hearing. L Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to waive entire reading and to set September 19, 1979, as date for Second Reading, and to incorporate the following changes into Ordinance No 85: Scctlon 1 - a - (1) length of leash to be deleted Section 1 - e - change "City Issued pewit" to Citp Authorization. Section 1 - e - change "personal injury' to "serious personal Injury" Section 1 - m - change "model airplanes" to "fuel paver driven model airplanes ". City ronnell Ml rtes September 5, 1979 Page 4 Hutton carried by the following vote: AYES: Mikuls, Bttdge and Frost. NOES: None ABSENT: Schlosser and Palumbo Title and number read by Mr Wasserman ORDINANCE NO 85 (First Redding) AIN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CERTAIN ACFS TO BE UNLAWFUL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CITY OWNED OR OPERATED PARKS OR OTHER RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. 6 STAFF REPORTS. A. Community Services Director, Bill Holley, reported on proposed cantract between City and National Institute for Community Development - Project Esperanza Budget transfer of $7,600 for supplemental support for project approved by Council on August 15, 1979 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve contract as to form and to authorize Mayor to sign agreements on behalf of City Motion carried • 3 -0. (ABSENT: Sehlosaer and Palomino). B. Community Services Director, Bill Holley, requested authorization frog Ceuncll to send out Requests for Proposals for the design of Heritage Park. Motion: Moved by hikels, seconded by Bridge to authorize Community Services . Department to prepare and distribute Requests for Proposals for the design of Heritage Park. Mocian carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) C. Bill Holley reported on request Crum the 426th. Civ41 Affairs Pompany of the United States Army Reserve to conduct a Civil Defense and disaster preparedness study within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr Holley reported the only services required from the City would be photocopying services, which would be handled by the Community Services Department Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve request from 426th Civil Affairs Company of the United States Amy Reserve to conduct a Civil Defense and Disaster preparedness study within the City of Rancho Cucamonga Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) D. Lloyd Hubbs presented report on Storm Drain Reimbursement Policy and copy of Reimbursement Agreement for Council Review. Agreement provides for •stablishmant of a reimbursement fund each year equal to 10% of the nmounc of storm drain fees collected during that year Fund would be used for payments to developers for atom drain development costs over and above • the mount of the atom drain fee they would be required to pay. Discussion followed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to adopt reimbursement agreement as to form and establish t imbursment policy as outlined in agreement Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) E Mr Hubbs reported and =do recommendations on aspects of a Public Works I maintenance program for site City Incorporating the services of a main[ewnce L management consulting firm, Roy Jorgensen Associates. The firm of Roy Jorgensen Associates had previously been granted Ccuncil approval to conduct a contract managment analysts to develop a proposal for a maintemuce management program and budget That firm Is currently In the process of conducting an inventory and evaluation to identify the prmblm of street and parkway maintenance within the City Discussion followed Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve a conyract with Roy Jorgensen Associates to develop a parkway maintenance program as outlined In proposal reviewed by Council, and further, that in mount of $4,860. previously allocated for parkway maintenance salaries, be transferred from Community Services Department to Community Development's Engineering Division contractual services fund for payment of services from Roy Jorgensen Associates. Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) 0 City Council Minutes September 5, 1979 Page 5 F Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, presented staff report and recommendation concerning appropriate resolutions regarding Air Quality Management Plan Discussion followed during which Council directed that Section 1 -g of Resolution No 79 -68 be amended to read: (line 3 of Section 1 -g)" policies which may foster. " Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to approve and adopt Resolution No 79 -68 as amended and to waive entire reading Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: Nlkela, Bridge and Frost NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser and Palambo. Title and number read by Mayor Frost RESOLUTION No 79 -68 A RE30LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COMMITTING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMI3.T OF THOSE ELEMENTS OF THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MlNACEHENT PLAN APPROPRIATE TO ITS JURISDICTION. Discus ..: an Air Quality Managem.:nt Plan continued. Notion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge for approval and adoption of Resolution No. 79 -69, and to ware entire reading Notion carried by the • following vote: AYES: HSkelo. Jrldge and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlonser and Palumbo. Title end number read by Mayor Frost. WOLUTION No 79 -65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO COOPERATE AND PARTY 'ATE IN THE CONTINUING PLANNING EFFORTS OF THE AIR STY MANAGEMENT PLAN G Lauren Wasserman presented a report and recoamendatlon regarding purchase of Plectior. supplies for 1980 general muninlpal election Approximate coat 1s' $8,100 plus variable expenses. R.T. Denny, representing Diamond Intcrmtional Corporation was present to discuss his fi='s supplies with Council Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded bl Mikels to direct staff to continue negotiations with Dimond Interrmtt,aal Corporation to effect contract for election supplies and to participate in regional counting of ballots. Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palumbo) H Lauren Wasserman presented a report and recozmmendation regarding sale of excess City property on southwest turner of Rellman and Baseline. Property was previously purchased by City to complete street improvements. Excess property not used for street improvements is not a pracel large enough for development Therefore, it was recommended excess property be offered for sale to adjacent • property owner for the price City paid for property, plus all escrow, legal and appraisal fees. Total price - $23,150. Notion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to authorize staff to offer "case property for sale to adjacent property owners. Notion and second withdrawn by Bridge and Mikelo, respectively. Discussion followed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikela for approval and adoption of Resolution 79 -73 concerning City owned property. Motion carried by the following votu: AYES: Bridge, Mikels and Frost NOES: None. ABSENT: Schlosser and Palumbo Title and number read by Mr. Wasserman. RESOLUTION No 79 -73 A RESOLUTION OF THe. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. PROVIDING THAT THE rROVISIONS OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65402 (a) SHALL NOT APPLY TO CERTAIN ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS OF PROPERTY. Discussion on sale of City property Continued City Council Minutes September 5, 1979 Page 6 0 Motion: (loved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to authorize staff to offer for sale to adjacent property owner, excess City property on the southwest corner of Hellman and Basullne for the rum cf $23,150 and that monies from said sale be turned beck Into street gas tax fund Motion Amended, with the approval of Bridge and Mikels that procuiure for role of said property shall follow Goverment Coda Section 37350 and 37351 Motion carried is amended 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schloscer and Palombol Mayor Frost called for a recesn at 9:50 p.m. Panting reconvened at 10:07 Councilmen Schlosser and Palombo serene I Jack Lam presented a report and re ,.cmmerdation from Planning Commission to hire a consultant to prepare r®ainina general plan elements. Requests for Proposals were sent out and the Consultant Selection Committee selected the firm of Sedway and Cooke. Discussion followed, with the following participants: Herman Hempel, Peter 7olstoy, Douglas Hone. Motion: Moved by Mikels, secnnded by Bridge to approve General Plan pre ;ram as per the City's Rerlr eat for Proposal; authorize the retention of Be& ay/ Cooke to perform the scope of services requested including the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report through certification; authorize the expenditure of previously budgeted $100,000 for the General Plan Program; authorize expenditure of $12,000 from the contingent. fund for the purpose of EIR preparation; nod direct staff to prepare contract doeuments for City Council review and approval. • Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) J Lloyd Hubbs reported on bid opening for construction of traffic sigusla at Haver Avenue and Amber Street. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels that bid be awarded to Ito bidder, Steiny and Company, in the amount of $47,800, and that staff is directed to effect and execute contract for said project Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palomlu) K. Lloyd Hobbs presented report as bids received and a recommaadation concer.ing street striping services. Motion: proved by Bridge, seconded by MSkela that staff be directed to award bid and exec to contract for street striping services to Orsnge County Striping Service for the a= of $25,474, in accordance with that firm 's bid. Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) L Lloyd Hobbs projected Council with a request to .olicit Requests for Proposals for planning and design services related to updatind the City's Master Plan of Story Drains and for design services relating to the constriction of the proposed Carnelian Channel Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to approve staff requests and authorize staff to solicit proposals for planning and design servicas relating • to the update of the City's Master Plan of Storm Drains and for the design services relating to the construction of the proposed Carnelian Channel. Motion carried 3 -0 (ABSENT: Schlosser and Pblombo) Lloyd Hobbs requested two Councilmen to participate during the interview process for proposed consultants. Discussion followed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Frost to appoint Councilmen Mikels and Schlosser to sit on interview board to interview proposed consultants. Councilman Mikels accepted appointment with the understanding that interviews can be scheduled on Saturdav Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser sad Palombo) M. Lloyd Hobbs presented a request to solicit bide for street sweeping Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconr oy Bridge to authorize staff to solicit bide for street sweeping services for the City. Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palombo) r,. City Council Minutes September 5, 1979 Page 7 • 0. It m removed P. Jack Lam requested Public Mear'ng date for Growth Hanagement Plan be set for September 19, 1979 Motion: Moved by Bridge, second&] by Hikels that Public Hearing for Growth Management Plan be set for September 1/, 1979 Motion curried 3 -0. (ASSENT: Schlosser and Palumbo) Q. Jack Lam presented request for authorization for a trip to Oakland for City Engineer to consult with City's Traffic Consultant, and a trip to San Franc_sco for Community Development Director to coordinate various contractual agreements and arrangements. Motion: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Bridge to approve staff request for trips and to approve expenditure of $130.00 from contingency fund for necessary meetings. Motion carried 3 -0. (ABSENT: Schlosser and Palumbo) 7. City Attorney Reports - none. 8. New Business - none. 9. Adiournmeut Motion: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Bridge to adjourn meeting to 8:30 a.m. Saturday, September 8. 1979. Motion carried 3 -0. ( A3SENT: Schlosser and Pblombo). Meeting adjourned nt 10:50 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, �y , Mary G " Whitney Interim Secretery •