Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/10/03 - Agenda Packet
?,nncho Gucamvva Chamber of Commerce Honorable Mayor and Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Re: Growth Management Dear Sirs: 9354 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 TELEPHONE 714.887.1012 October 3, 1979 The Board of Directors requests that consideration of the Residential Growth Management ordinance and Residential Assessment System resolution be continued to the November 7, 1979 meeting of Council. we are requesting the further delay for the following reasons: The magnitude of the changes which staff is recommending, the unusual areas of concern which cam., to light during the extensive chamber Growth Management Stuiy CcaWaittee meetings and the need for more detailed and conceitrated input from the Building Industries Association and the salty Eoard with the Chamber of Commerce. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely yours, It. A. Cober President HAC /vr ancho Cum= 'ya Chamber o f Commerce 9354 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 TELEPHONE 714. 987.1012 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Re: Advisory Coinmittee Dear Sirs: October 3, 1979 It 3s the request of the Board of Directors that when vacancies occur on the Advisory Cammittee consideration be given to appointing at least one industrial /commercial oriented individual to each of the geographic units with- in the committee. The Board of Directors further requests that should the council decide to establish the Advisory Committee 9' by ordinance and change its title to Advisory Commission, It not specify the terms of office of the appointes until HL y 2, 1980. Thank you for your cooperation in these �attors. HAC /vr Sincerely yours, H. A. Cover, President co W C 0 U) Q. ca 0 ca 0 U 0 'S 49 � a eye n3�gk $93g g -All CL _CC h 01,111 912 ACAs 2 v 0 L CD U cr- m J :g 1 s A s E li rill gll p x �M In f� I CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEHORAK)UM Date: October 1, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: lack I.m. Director of Community Development Subject: REIAININC ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES TO GROWTH MAIWEMENT PLAN ABSTRACT: At the last City Council meeting, the Growth Management Plan was continued in order to allow the Building Industry Association (BIA), Realty Board, and small builders an opportunity to meet and discuss possible changes in the Ordinance and the Residential Assessment System Staff has participated In the discussions an! two Issues remain They are as follows: 1 Equal rating status for small projects and large projects. 2 Priority of allocation of sever and school facilities. Staff has reviewed the two remaining lempts and the following are recu®enda- tions for each issue. DISCUSSION: Issue 01: Equal rating status for wall protects and large protects. _ The basic substance of the eve meetings that staff attended was the discussion of the equity between large developers and small developers within the Residential Assessment System. In both meetings, staff along with the builders actually :aced a number of projects both Snflll tracts, apartment projects and planned communities. Both the planned communities (large projects) and apartments did reach the threshold level, however, infill tract projects di! mt. We have carefully reviewed the results of the projects rrted and recommend the following point changes to equalize the disparity between small developments add large developments a. Change 01 - Section IA. Drainage. Changu the points of criteria 01 from i to 8 points. Change the points of criteria 02 from 8 to 2 points. Change the points of criteria 03 from 2 to 1 point. b. Change 02 - Section 18 Street Circulation and Improvements. Change criteria 02 from 4 to 5 points Change crireria 04 from 2 to 4 points. c. Change 03 - Section ID. Parks and Paths. . Change criteria 05 from 2 to 4 points. Change criteria 07 from 1 to 2 points Remaining Issues and Alternatives to Growth Management Plan - ,• October 1, 1979 Page 2 d Change 04 - Section 2D, Energy Conservation. Change criteria 02 from 1 to 2 points. Change criteria 04 from 1 to 2 points e Change 05. Section 4A. Planned Communities. Change the points allowable from 6 to 7 points. f Change 06, Section 7, Threshold Limit. Change threshold from 70 to 68 points. Each of the changes recomended above have been Incorporated In a corrected copy of the Residential Assessment System included In this package In order co illustrate the effect of the point changes recommended, staff will be pre- pared at the City Council meeting to tun through a number of ample development& both Will (mall developments), and infill developments on the periphery of existing development; and planned coc,unity (large projects) REOMMEMATION: It is recoamended thrt the changes listed above be included In the system. Issue 02: Priority Allocation of Sever and School Facilities. As the City Council is aware, this item was a subject of catch discussion at the last meeting with no particular resolution to the problem. The issue arose out of a concern, that there may be limited allocation of school and /or sewer and water facilities available. It is quite possible that while the developers are working on the solution to the school Impaction problm,attrltion will create space in the schools and therefore the City would be presented with a need to make a decision as to which development may proceed before another. As the Ordinance was previously presented to the City Council it provided for allocation and prioritizing of developments; and prioritization and allocation of space to those developments that participate in a solution to the school Impaction pro- blem. The Ordinance should provide for prioritization and allocation when there is limited supply; however, we recormend against the City Council adopting a prioritization system for those applicants who participate in a solution to the school Impaction problem. Reasons for this recommendation are as follows: I In order .o solve the lmpactdon problem the applicants are going to have to provide an entire new high school facility That vill not free to 100, 200 or 100 spaces but free up well in excess of 2,000 spaces depending upon the capacity that the school is designed for. This rranslacea into over 11.000 dwelling units based on a .17 student /dwelling unit factor Remaining Issues and Alternatives to Growth Management Plan October 1. 1979 Page J The Planned Communities by themselves can not solve the school impaction problem. The problem Involves a commitment much too large for the planned communities alone. The cornitmot of property over the number of years required Is too large to be profitable for the planned communities. We believe that everyone realizes that the solution meet be one that will allw all developers large and small to participate Therefore, since this is a large participation solution, we do not feel it is necessary for the City to set forth an allocation priority for school, water or saver cepacity. REC"EIMATION: It is r• tmmended that the City Council =lude the loot paragraph of Iage 6 from Jrdinance 86. Resp ctfulip ubmitted, l� 'v JACK 1A4, Director of Community Development JL: N:H: no r CITY OF RANCHO OUCA4ONGA MEMORANDUI Date: October 2, 1979 To: City Council From: Jack lam, Director of Community Development Subject: GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Please find attached a copy of a moan regarding the remaining Issues and alter- natives to the Growth Management Plan and a revised copy of the Growth Management Plan with changes underlined and asterisked for your convenience. These two documents were intended to be the submittal package for Wednesday nights' City Council meeting; however, I neat inform you of a very recent development that could effect the outcome of the program. Monday afternoon, the City Manager and myself met with the Executive Committee of the Industrial Cmmittea of the Chamber of Commerce This committee discussed a very significant issue relating to growth management that transcends the "big builder vernus small builder" issue. This Stoup Is vitally concerned about accepting applications for tract filings at the same time when the City ought to be concerned with the more important issues of completing its planning foundation (completing the General Plan, revising the Interim laments, completion of the Hasler Plan of Storm Drains update, the Traffic Molel, the Fiscal Impact Model, the Industrial Specific Plan and other Important •roRrams that have now come together) This group believpa that staffs' timt would act be put to best use reviewing the deluge of tract applications when he first application period opens up (currently January, 1980). Staff time and Commission and Council energies should be focused upon building the City's foundation rather than coping with the pressures of tract mas approvals Since all builders have agreed that unless there is a school solution [hero would be no building pe,�its, it becomes somewhat aca- demic to accept tract filings with a condition of school letters if the solution las not been yet formulated The group also felt that if tract maps are filed without such a solution, speculation could result by individuals bailing out of their properties and selling them with approved tentative =Ps. The pressures upon the City would be enormous, thus the Ca:mittee submitted a recommendation be the Chamber of Comrroe Board of Directors that the Chamber of Commerce recommend to the City Council that applications not be accepted for new tract filings until after the more important issues of advanctd planning be completed. The Growth Management Committee of the Chamber of Commerce met Monday evening to discuss the issues. Present at that meeting were businessmen, developers and property owners Many of these Individuals belong to the B I.A., the Chamber of Commerce, and have cross affiliations with other organizations Mat was dis- cussed was placing the school criteria to the "front end" of the process rather than the "tall -end" of the process as It is now Staff naturally supported the former process since it originally recommended that new applications only be 31 4`� Growth Management Program Cctober 2, 1979 Page 2 accepted when a school solution was found and rot before. Thar however, was modified through the Planning Commission hearings based upon vigoro is objections by the Building Industry. Nov, the school letters are a condition of approval for a final map The Building Industry argued vocifsmusly that tie criteria should be kept at the tail -and In order to foster a school solution and to main - tai.t pressure upon the school districts to assts- in solving the problem. The re.son staff recommended the former approach in the original Growth Mamgement P an draft (the criteria be up front) vas to avoid the kind of pressure situstion the City had at the time of incorporation with the intense backlog of applications and it,- issue of what to do with them and how to handle the pressure from builders for releasing building permits The Building Industry feels this situation would not reoccur bemuse those submitting applications row know the ground mleo upon which building permits would be faaued Staff attended the meeting basically as an observer and not to fostor one positfod versus the other and only commented when asked to respond. The meeting use h•mlcally a aobbying effort between builders and businesmen to hatser out a position to take regarding applications. Clearly the B.I.A. took the minority view even while some of its members (who were also members of the Chamber of Commerce Growth Committee) cook the view that files should rot be accepted until some of these advance planning Projects are completed. The meeting placed Ken Willis in a defensive position, and a possible compromise situation might be that the criteria of schools be left at cite tall -end of the process but that the fi -st application period rot begin until after the adoption of the general plan and th completion of these other programs Thus it would appear that Ken must now go be k to the general B I.A. membership to try to convince them that unless the B I.A too' a position of supporting an exten- sion of the filing period that the Chsmber o° ,ommerce would core out supporting revising the school criteria i. Vic meeting resulted in a motion to request the City Council to delay discussion of the Growth Management Plan for four weeks This is to enable the group that cat last night to eo an intense lobbying effort to support no application of tract maps until the general plan has been completed This posture will tun up against some resistance from the B.I.A., however, it Is my opinion that during the four weeks there will be ac Intents eegotiation bemoan the various interest groups to determine when that first e,plicacion period would begin The present ordinance stipulates January 1, 1180 as the first filing period There has been some dis- cussion about moving the application period to May or June of 1980 but the final outcome of this will be determined through the negotiation process The above raises the significant question of whether applications for new filings should be accepted when we have not developed a school solution, and if so, when should this first appllcation period start While this whole discussion at this late date was not initiated by staff but by membera of the Industrial Committee, staff takes the viewpoint that if there Is support for the above motion, than the application period should not begin until the comple• ion of the General Plan which is scheduled for a ten month process beginning October lot, during which time the fiscal impact model, the traffic model, the industrial specific plan, the =star plan of storm drains will also be addressed, Growth Management Pion Occuber 2, 1919 Page 7 Staff would concur with the ideal of postponing consideration of the Growth Management Plan for four weeks to allow this kind bf dialogue to occur between builders and businessmen so that a recommondetion of no applications can come directly from them Ne will be provid.ng these groups with copies of the revised ordinance so that we can quietly put to rest the issue of "big builder" versus "small builder". Tinrefore, staff will be recommending to the City Council the same puscponament. If you have any questions or concerns about this matte.r, please let me know as soon as possible. Respectfully I ubmitted, JACF: 1.1`I, Direc cor o Co cam nity Development JL: not ORDINANCE NO 86 (Revised 9/27/79) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GROWTH 11ANAGE'1ENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DE'7ELOPMEftT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows SECTION 1 The City Council •ereby finds and determines the following A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did by its Resolution Ito 79 -58 following a public hearing held in the time and manner described by law recommend the establishment of a growth management plan hereinafter described and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered said recommendation B. That the City Council has reviewed and considered the Growth Manaqement Plan and all testimony and comments pertaining to it and finds the Growth Management Plan to be adequate to scope and content C. That the Growth Management Plan will have no significant environmental impact as orovided in the negative declaration filed herein SECTION 2. PURPOSE AND PRIORITY A. Findines 1 Unmanaged residential growth in the City of Rancho Cucanonga can overburden elementary, junior and senior high schools in the community 2 Unmanaged residential growth can strain public services and result in the impairment of the health, safety and welfare of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Haphazard and disorderly growth patterns adversely affect the City's and public agency's ability to provide adequate public services for all developments 4 Ilinimal architectural and site design criteria of residential development can create a "tract" appearance to the community. Such an appearance detrimentally affects the physical character and image of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Further, lack of landscaping and design sensitivity can diminish the environmental quality and economic well being of the comm:nity. Ordinance Ila 86 -2- 5 Continued unmanaged growth can seriously impair the City's ability to carry out the goals and policies of toe General Plan and can adverseiy a.fect the he Ith and welfare of the community 6 Purpose A Growth Hanagement Plan Is designed to implement certain primary goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. These goals constitute the purpose of a Growth Management Plan and are as fellows 1 To preserve and enhance the physical character of the comm.ni,y. •.. 2 To help ensure that adequate school facilities for all existiml an uture residential development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are provided. _ 3 to help ensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. •" 4 To ensure that minimum design quality in new developments is provided to enhance the aesthetic, environmental, historical and economic well being of the community. 5 To encourage use of energy conservation techniques in new residential development 6. To help maintain and improve levels of C,cy administrative service.. 7 To encourage orderly development of resi^ences within areas more readily served by public services. R. To encourage the development of masi-!r planned projects which provide the service needs of tha residents if those projects. 9 To encourage the 2rovi�sion of a variety of housing tuprs and encourage at., dable housing. C Scope This ordinance sn." ply to all residential development projects ih the r tf + Rancho Cucamonga, as defined in Section Ordinance No. 66 -3- SECTION 3: DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated CL1ty - City in this ordinance refers specifically to the City of Rancho Cu.arionga Itandatory Criteria - Criteria considered essential for all resideWal dev-eToprent Residential Oavelor t Project - Any development which will resin tee ;is6di on of sidential lots or the construction of new residential owelling units including single family, multi family, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, olanned ... communities, planned unit developments, modular units, condominiu�. convers ons -i oi'�well dwelling units which have not been built prior to the effective date of this ordinance, mobilehome parks, etc , which regu-re review by application of this ordinance Resjnent,al Asses ;ment 55 stem - The measuring device, provided yY lct oo —i n ,�l e! City Council and adopted concurrently herewith, which es composed of a number of rating criteria uses' for assigning point r,.tings to proposed residential development projects Threshold Point Limit - The minimum number of points a project i -, reau.r to rece ve under the residential Assessment Syste+ in order to receive consideration for approval SECTION 4: EXEMPTIONS The following projects shall be specifically exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance A. single family, duplex and triplex developments involving a total of four (4; units or less provided that any such application on a parcel shall be on a one time bas s only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a building permit for the last unit on said parcel B ,. esidential lanc(/,drrisi involving four lilts or le•s provided that any application on a pan el having the sa,re zoning district shall be on a one time basi, only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a iu'ldirg permit for the last unit of the project Subdivisions separating parcels ' having different zoning district's- sTilT be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance C Govern ent subsidized senioa, citizen housing projects D. Renewable building permits issued prior to he effective date of this ordinance E Condominium conversiogs of dwelling units built prior to the effective date of this ordinance Ordinance No ,6 -A- SECTION 5 APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND FEE' A cgOication -_ An application for a residential development project shall be made to the Connunity Development OeDertment of he City of Rancho Cucamonga on a form provided by the City Such application shall contain the following information and be accompanied by the Following documents Site L "ilizatioa Hap including Vicinity Map to show the relationship of the proposed development to adjacent oevelopment and surrounding area (small inset map) Use Layout Ilap showing the location and type of Proposed residential use or uses, the nature and extent of open space, the extent of any o0er uses proposed and indication of all adjacent uses 2 Detailed Site Plan to include detailed information specified in fonms provided by the rmmunity Developma.. Department 3 Illustrative Site Plan to nclode proposed and existing improverents, landscape concepts and other elements ds may be necessary to illustrate the site plan. 4 Preliminary Architectural Plan showing typirals of all sides of proposer' buildings and structures indicating materials to to used, trees, landscaping, and shadows to give elevations g -aphic dimension 5 Conceptual grading and drainage plan and nat,iral futures map showing a general indication of type, extent, and time of grading ai ter requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance 6 Development Schedule of pruposed uroject ncluding prising. Bees Although no grouch management review fees will be assessed anv residential development protect, the normal fees for subdivisions, director reviews, site approvals, appeals, extensions, etc , shall be assessed as per City Council Fee Resolution Said fees shall be non- ref-indabte even in the event the threshold point limit is nut met Ordim-ce qo 86 -5- SECTION 6. MANDATORY CRITERIA Certain residential development criteria are con idered essential tc Ensurt General Plan consistency and adequate public services for each residential project In the event services are not available to de,eicpers, the builder, buildinq associations and other individuals and groups are Pnco-,raged to work with time school districts and other special districts to solve respective problems in order that services may be available for develocment The Director of Community Development shall onsura that certain criteria are met prior to final approval of any residential development o-oject subject to the provisions of t;iis ordinance Such criteria shall be placed as condition; of approval which must be n. prior to approval of a final map tur i subdivision or prior to issuo,ice of building permits for residential day lopment projects other than "�• subdivisions Sdid criteria shall be net it the fo'.lowinn order Tne proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan this criteria shall be met prior to meeting criteria B. The applicant ha'1 submit to the Community Development Director written certification from all affected elementary school distrlcts and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District that adequate school facilities or proposed future school facilities are or, will be capable of accommodating students gererated bi, the prop ^'ed project. This certification shalt be obtained prior to mt.tino criteria C. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Director written certification 'rum the Cucamonga County Hater District that adeouate sc«er and water facilities are ar will be available to serve the proposed project For projects using septic facilities allowab'.e by the Santa Ana P gional Quality Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptabil'ty including all supportive information shall be obtained. SECTION 7 RfiiEN AHD PROCESSIt:G PRQCEDURES FOR RES IOENTIAL DEVELOPMEN. A Establishment of o Residential Assessment system. All applications for residential development projects shill be .+. rated � a committee composed of members of Commm it Development DC artment Co-munit Services Fire District. Po ice etc.. as �er�criteria esta . s ea a Res dentia ssessment S stem ich shall be adopted by the L ty council Res dent al Assessment 3ysten adopted by the Council shall establish five t5) basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub- categories for rating purposes The five (5) basic categories upon which each application will be rated are (11 Public +.+ services, (2) Design Quality (3) Affordable Housingg (4) Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments (PUD), and (5) Orderly Development Ordinance No. 86 -6- Projects shall be evaluated under the Residential Assessment System Tri- annually by the Community Development Director. Application submittal deadline dates and review dates shall be as follows: Review Period 1 - Januar 1 -Aril 31. Op scat on 1ne per od - anus rr - a uar/ 31 '•• Review Period 2 JUX 1 - August 3 _scat on in yeriq_d - Mav 1 - May 31 ••' Review Period 3 - - D-cember 31 0o cat on fil ine period - Segtrb r 1 - September al A Threshold Point Limit shall be established by the City Council as pzrt of tNe Residential Ass - ssment system. This Threshu,d Point Limit shall constitute the minimum number of points a project is required to achieve If it is to be given any further consideration for approval In the event school facilities and or water and sewer facilities are in limited supply and have to be allocated to meet the mandatory criteria conditions, the following system of pr•orities shall b- established by the Lanmunity Development Director should said facilities become available: All applications which pass the threshold point limit a -d receive approval within any single review period sha'1 receive priority ranking before those projects approved in successive review periods Within each single review period, however, the priority ranking shall be based upon the highest point rating above the threshold limit. In the event a tie exists withi., the single review period, the priority ranking shall go to the project which receives approval .first In the ^vent of further ties, the priority ranking shall go to the project which submitted a complete application first. Ordinance No 86 -7- within (5) days after the Point rating determination, the Communit Deg nt Director shall cause a written notice to e ma cert edj to the applicant stating the point ratinq for his residential development project and whether his application has received the required Threshold Point Limit for further consideration by the Planning Commission Appeal of Ratings Ratings of applications which require the approval of the Community Development Director may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any agygrieved person or body, public or private, within fourteen (14) days after the day of decision of Community Development Director The decision of the Planning Commission of any such appeal may be appealed to the City Council by any aggrieved party in the same manner and time limitations as are set forth for the filing of an appeal with the Planning commission. The decision of the City Council shall be final SECTIO11 8: PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Anplications subject to the provisions of this ordinance and subject to Planning Commission review and approval shall be evaluated in terns of environmental review and clearance, subdivision review pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, and residential development project review pursuant to the Growth lanagement Plan. The Planning Commission shall approve or deny the project after said review The Planning Commission shall also hear appeals of point ratings as described in Section 7B. SECTION 9. BUILDING PERMIT ISSUMICE 110 building permits shall be issued for any residential dwelling unit which is subject to the provisions of this Ordinance w.thout approval as provided herein, provided however, that nothinn in this Ordinance shall be deemed or Intended to abrogate or annul any prior residential development project approval lawfully issued and in effect on the date of the effectiveness of this Ordinance wish respect to an already approved building permit. land division or site plan including all residential development projects submitt -d for plan check unless time limits of such approvals described above have been exceeded in which case such projects are subject to the provisions of the Growth Management Plan. SECTIOU 10 TI14E LIMITS FOR APPROVAL A. Expiration of ,Approval The fol owing provision shall apply to applications for Residential Development Projects except as specifically exempted by Section 4 of this ordinance Residential development projects approved after the effective date of this Ordinance shall expire after twelve (12) months from date of approval Ordinance No. 86 -8- Extension of 'tentative SuWivlsion Approval A person who has filed a tentative subdivision may request an extension of spproval or conditional approval from the Planning Commission by written application to the Community Development Department S•ich an extension request application oast be filed at ltast si•.6y (60) days before the approval or conditional approval is due to expire The application shall contain a statement of the reasons for the extension and a detailed description of the prooress mane towards meeting all the conditions for final approval If an extension is granted, n.wr conditions may be imposed and existing conditions may he revised by the Planning Commission Any extension of a subdivision shalt not exceed a period of eighteen (18) months SECTION 11: ANNUAL REVIFW AND EXPIRFTION This Ordinance shall be reviewed annually by the City Council and Planning Commission and shall be of no further force or effect after a period of five (5) years from the date of adoption of thi; Ordinance, unless extended by Ordinance of the City Council SECTION 12: OTHER LAWS, ORDERS AND ORDINANrES Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to atfect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to the properties ant areas affected by this Ordinance, nor sh.11 It be deemed to conflict with any State laws, orders or requirements affecting such properties or areas In the event that a conflict does arise, the more restrictive ordinance shall apply SECTION 13: SEVERABILITY The invalidity of any work, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part or provisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other part of this Ordinance which can be given affect without such invalid part or parts This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a m on the 31st day after its adoptlun SECTIM 14: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of qeneral circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California PASSED, APPROVED, and A')OPTEO this day of , 1 979 AYES NOES: ABSENT ATTEST: RESOLUTION 110. 79 -74 (Revised 10/1/79) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS - HENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY WwrREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Orr ante he. 86 entitled 'An Ordinance of the City Council of the City fancho Cucamonga, California, establishing a Growth Management Plan to Regulate flew Residential Development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ", which requires that a Residential Assessment System for development review be established setting frrtr five (5) basic categories, eac, category ,.ei,g a,signed a maximum number of total points which shall La used for rating purposes; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City has recommended adoption of a Growth Management Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the purposes of the Growth Management Plan as set forth in paragraph B of Section 2 of said Ordinance and the criteria required to be considered in paragraph A. Section 7 of said Ordinance including, but not limited to, Public Services, Design Quality Affordable Housing, Planned Corrunities and Planned Unit oeveloome,ts, and Oruerly Development 'IOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a Residential Assessment System is established based upon the following criteria: SECTION 1 PUBLIC SERVICES A Drainage Facilities The City Engineer shall review each project to detern.ine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff A project must receive a minimure of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration 0 pts max'num) ,.. 1 Project drains into an existing or planned steno drain or street capable of handling the surface water gere -ated 3 point sI .•. 2 Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond units of site which 1s +lso capable of handling the surface water generated by the project 2 points) •» 3 Project provides special drainage facilities (e g , on- site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities raintalned by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (1 point 1. ... (MOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities. Ora a.0 ee Resolution Ito. 79 -74 Page 2 Street Circulation and Improvements The City Engineer shall review each project In terms of street circulation and Its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project. A project must receive a minimum of 5 points In this category In order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum) ••• 1 Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully Improved major or secondary hiphway (5 points) •'• 2 Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points). 3 Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points) ••• 4. Project will build or widen a collector street or Is located adjacent to a fully improved ecllectar street (4 points). 5. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by City standards (2 points) •`• (NOTE: For =125ta submitted an Planned Communities, g[r set Circulatlon and Ieprovrnents shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project) C Residential Safety and Security The Community Development Director shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department and the Foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project incorporates safaty and security techniques A project must receive a minim, of 3 points in each of the following categories in order to receivo further consideration (g points maximum) 1 Police Protection (4 points maxim-) «+ a. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Co=laslon or Cnmrunity Development Director on over 70Z of its perimeter (2 points) ••• b Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Commlunlon or Cosuniry Development !rector between 25% and 70. of its perloc[er (1 point). Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 2b c Solid core exterior door, occurtty dead bolts and locks will ht installed (2 points) d. Security devices such as window lockv will be installed in each unit (1 point) a. Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting, placement, etc., to enhance residential security (1 point). •.. (NOTE: For project submitted as Planned Comrnmitles (bllet Protection shall be evaluated for the entirr project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project) Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 7 2. Fire Protection (4 points maximum) a 702 - 802 of the project is within a three minute driving response time of a fire station (4 pointn) b 702 - 802 of project is between a three and five minute driving response time of a fire station (2 points) c 70 - 802 of project 1$ octween a five and seven minute driving response time of a five station (1 point) d. Fire mitigation measures (e g., :ire resistant bulluing materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) are incorporated Into the design of the project. Points in this category $hall be evaluated by the Foothill Fire District (2 points) D. Parks and Paths The Community Development Director shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and/or private parks and usable open space A project must receive a minims Of > points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum) 1 Project provides an or off site public park iWprovements and /or school recreational facilities (1 point) 2. Project ptoviees privately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (t point) 3 Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and/or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (1 point) 4. Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point) +•. 5 Over 502 of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius Of an existing public park site (4 palate) •.• 6 Over 502 .f project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park site (1 point) • +. 7 Over 502 of project 1• located between 1/2 and I mile radii of an enisting public park site ( 2 points) «• 8 Over SOS of project is located between 1/2 end 1 mile radii of a future Proposed n blt nark Alta (1/2 point) "• 9 More than 502 of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of usable public open space ocher than public narks. (C-g , school facilities, national forest, etc ) (1 point) Resolution No 79 -76 Pape 7b (NOTE: For protects submitted as Planned Communities, provision of parkR shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total hall he applied to each phase of that project ) Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 4 Neighborhood Commercial Shoppina Center The Community Development Director shall review each project for its location to existing and future neighborhood commercial shopping centers For the purposes of this section a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maxiwuml 1 More than 505 of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points) *•+ 2 More than 50: of project is within 2 miles of a planned mature ne(V110orh000 COmmerC a shopp n center points). 3 Iore than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) ..+ 4 fibre than 505 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a tanned future neighborhood commerc a s o n-gcente�l point). 5 Project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) Project Maintenance The project provides fir a Homeowner's Association and /or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site main - tonance (3 points). •'• (hOTE: if the City determines that there are no public right -of -ways within or adjacent to the Project that do not normally require city maintenance, the project will receive the max'mun Points to this categorvl. SECTION 2. DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design The Design Review Committee (consisting of two appointed members of the Planning Commission and the Director of Community Development or his designate), shall review each project for architectural design quality as indicated by the quality of construction and by the architectural elevations of the proposed buildings judged in terms of architectural style, size and height (up to 10 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represents the general types of Architectural Desigr elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation projects may include other criteria not Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 0 specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the ... mavimum number of points It is not the intent of the Growth Fienagement Plan to dictate a particular architecture nor to encoura a certaiin Priced materials nor a ate speciiiccesign solutions it is e�fii intent OT tneGrowth T nagaren f at to Oster creative es gn sou ons an o scoura- discriminatory review o ig r cost versus lower cost projects 1 Provides various visual and tactile t•xtures by using an assortment of building materials to finish surface. Creates variety in design and architecture that creates strong identity ..• a Prolect_ provides a mix of differing one sto�r dwel roes and /or a m x of one and two story dwellincs to achieve a variety of hous ng m x and to reduce the sameness of the protect. Resolution Bo. 79 -74 Page S b Varle• the types of building material~ within n project to create diversity, y,t not creating e'xce'ssive contrasts C. Varies the color and design of housing unite with particular attention to common themes without creating excessive contrasts d. Provides special design features such as curvilinear walks, textured walkways, etc. B. Site Orientation and Street peak The Design Review Committee shall review site orientation of each protect to determine variability of lot sizes and config- urations to accommodate terrain and street design, and also, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations (up to 10 points marimuc). Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Design Review Comitcee shall consider in their evaluation Pre' cts may Include other criteria not specifically mertioned 1 re and will be eligible for the s.aximun number of poi•,ts Site Orlentatlon 1 Minimizes crowding and enhances spatial relationships (c by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots). 7 Preserves desirable views and vistas by propar lot and housing layout 3 Mtnimizesshar, angled lots constituting pocr building sites 4 Designs lots and structures to integrat- with the natural topography and vegetation 5 Designs lots and btructures to minimize noise through tin use of set - backs, proper location of air conditlonlnl, units, living ar:os and the like 6 Creates vibual rtliet along redden lal .,treets(v g varying building setbacks, roof patrerns landscape tre.Ltm.rt, ,cc I Street Ocsirn I The design of street% and parkir, encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access wh,lt ^Intmining aeceptabla fire response time Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 6 a Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvi- linear street design and /or other design techniques b. Avoids short blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul -de -once` whenever )rnsslblu. c Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d Parking access 1s from local streets rather than secondary or major streets 2 Public transportation is encouraged by the project a Locates bus stops as part of the development wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bun routes. b. Provides bus pullout areas and covered waiting areas for user wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus routes 1. Varies sidewalk dimensions and pst.erns to avoid monotom 4 Provides handicapped access to the project C Landscape and Screening Design The Design Review Commie tee shall review each project for landscape and screening design. Such review will deter- mine compatibility ar all trees, shrubs, ground cover, walls and fences, mounding, paths, Lighting, etc , with the topo- graphy and site characteristics of the project (up to 10 points maximum) Criteria The following criteria represent the general types o: Landscape and Screening Design elements the Deatgn Review Co mittee shall consider in their evaluation. Projects my include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible 's• for th maximum number of points Each criteria may or may 1 Landscaping materials are utilized to provide home privacy and also screen trash and storage areas 2 landscaping techniques and building rratertals are used to enhance the quallr of the site and architecture Resolution No. 79 -14 Page 6b Project provides interior parkway landscape and irrigation improvements. Planting materials blend with and enhance the architectural design of the development. S. Fences, hedges, walls, etc., are compatible with and enhance the architectural design of the development. Resoultion No 79 -76 Page 7 6 Trees are used for hcrerning adlatent streets and erhanring Rite quality 7 Stabilization of slopes is pronottd by landscaping teelmlget which prevent slope eroe.lon g Llghting sourceR are ecrerrmd tt minlmlre light uptll over from one houso to Its ntigl.hor 9 Drought realstent plants are ntillzed 10 farehen berms are ;laced to dt Iineate the use of spatts provide privacy, reduce noise, control wind, mitigate flooding, frame views, etc 11 Grouped parking areas are landscaped to provide shading and visual srrecntr_ frott mtrects and buildings 12. Apartment /condominiu. and condominium conversion tree planting meets or exreco. the City standard of 50 trees /yroas i -re 0 Bnet gy Conservn[fon the Community Development Director -hall review each pro)tut subm!tted for provisions of passive ,ad active energy consvrt tivt techniques used in terms of architectu ml design, land- scaping, and site orientation (5 points ma "imum) 1 Building ortentat. m erd landscaping are designed to maxl- mize the use of passive solar weatin! In winter munthR and cooling winds in summer months a Buildings are situated to =ximlze {.nssive solar heating in winter months (e g , east -e -st aligned units, scuth facing windows, etc ) (1 point) b Windows are placed to allow cooling from prevailing westerly summer breezes (1/2 point) c Tree planting considers any effects at, the use or future ingcallatfon of residential solar energy collectors (1/2 point) *�• 2. Units are pre - plumbed for rdaption to solar energy htaltr. (2 points) 1 Entrgy conserving outl,llng materials and appliances are lntorporated Into the .irchitectural iertgn, (e.g.. redtecd ennsumptlen shower headu, berteP grade insular loo duuhle pane window, etc ) tl pout) •us a Development provides option to hom buvers to purthast — lar tmrgy uolhttorq for heating purp. %%cq (2 points) Res•tlutiun No 79 -74 Page 8 SECT10% 3: AFFURDAHI.E HOUSING Th. Director of Lo munity Uevelopment stall review all projects for tht pn.rlston of ad.qu„tc housing for all segments of the population in ore, r to err R• diveralifed neighborhood envlronmrnts and lncone group., avtduin_ can e,tratlons of any single income group in one particular neighhorl, Thine residential de%clopm.nt projects which provide "affordable" housln_ shill be given additional Feint consideration ns .,:1 an opportunities for dcnsltt bonuses For purposes of this section, Affordable Housing is defined as: Owner Oc.upled Projects which are sponsored through government programs or privately financed through market race programs having a price range of 3 5 times 80 -1202 of the current median family Income of San Bernardino County consistent with the City's Housing Assistance Plan (RAP). This income figure shall be readjusted annually and is currently $1.,800 * Retire- Occupied Fair market rent in San Bernardino County as defined h. Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act which shall be readjusted perloiically and is currently:** 0 of Bedrooms Detached Seed - detached /Raw Walkup Elov (2 -4 stories) 0 - - 262 280 1 - 348 316 336 2 460 425 377 399 3 512 4.1 409 - 4 568 535 454 - The above figure, lnclt.do the price of utilities and may be increase. h. -or -ore ttan V If allowable by the provisions or in& housing and cotaaun ty ,ve nt Act 'or - rejects which o not include utllitiv- .n nt renca - .es-eful.wing deductions from the above describe, fa. �rkct rate.+ shah be ado: I of Bearooms oeductirns for Utilities 0 25 1 30 2 35 3 40 4 4S *I*dfan filly Ltcnmc of San Nernardino County .s current as of Jamstn , IU79 and is readlusted annu.tlly. * *Fair market rent is current as of April. 1979 and Is readjusted pertedienlly 1 Resolution No. 79 -14 Pare 9 Cr t ac r la I Affordable housing shall be evaluated using the following crttwria: Project provides 152 or more affordable housing (A points, up to 202 den#Ity bonus) h Project provides 5 to 152 affordable housing (4 points, up to 102 density bonus) Project provides 1 to 52 #fforduble housing (2 points, up to 52 density bonus) ( \-ITE: For projects submitted as Planned Communlrlev, Affordable Housing shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project. This section may not be implemented until the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance have been amended to allow for density bonuses) SICTIOS PLANNED COM111NITIES AND PIA \'QED CHIT OEl'ELOPMQ.TS P.U.D. A Planned Comanitics The Community Development Director shall review each project submitted as a Planned Cummunity for the degree to which it achieves a varic.v of housing types, provides public facilities and servtcei, efficient internal c'rculatlon and overall integration of residential design factors For purposes of this ordinance, an application aubmltted as a Planned Comunttv + +s ou #t consist of a minimum of 300 ac -es (up to 3 polnta aaxlmum) Criteria The following criteria represent the geceral types of elements the Community Development Director shall consider when evaluating Planned Communities Such developments may Include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the cnxivum number of points I. Provides for a variety of housing types and costs to complement existing housing in the immediate area; i e , + +• Owner Occupied: single family, multi - family townhouses, condominiums); Rental: Apartments, duplexes and elderly family 2 Provides for nececsoty public facilities, a R . sewer and water Lines, fire facilities, school fsctlitiea, etc., to serve the residents of the development 3 Provides an efficient Internal eircul Ion system designed to maximize safety and minimize congv•t ton and monutonv, which is Integrated with the City'n Ims•er Street Plan 4 Create# various and diverse architectural and site design themes throughout the development, however, not over exaP,erating any one theme. Resolution No. 79 -76 Page 10 0 Planned Unit Developments (PUD) +•• Planned Unit Developmence (PUD'e) which are not a part of an adopted Planned Erx Hit! s mi race ve i point tor onto = acres of planned unit development not to exceed a total oL 1 points for the entire project. SECTION 5. ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT The Community Development Director shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and ccutinuous extension of existing development rather than "leap -frog develolment: Two thirds of a point will be Granted for each l0Z of the project that ♦•• is within 500' of existin devolopmcot or 500' within proposed develop which as been approved y the nnning Com es on or the Coccunrity SECTION 6: CUSTOM L(yr SUBDIVISIONS Custom lot • ubdivisions are those which create parcels not subsequently built upon but sold Individually or in groups to an Ind tvidual or builder As such, certain crlte-is such an architectural and landscape design carnot be evaluated at the time of subdivision Tlis section will evaluate those factors applicab :a to custom lot subdivision and derive a point rating which would apply to any future residential development project of five units or none on the custom lots Applications for custom Lot subdivisions shall be rated using the following criteria: A Public Services 1 Drainage Facilities The City Engineer slutll review each project to detemine Its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surL ce runoff A project must have a minimum of S Points In this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maxi--um) a. Project drains into as editing or planned atom drain or street capable of handling the surface +++ water generated (8 points). •" b. Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which are capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points). ++• c Project provides special drainage facilities (e g., on -site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities mrintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (I point). Resolution ho. 79 -74 Page 11 es• (NOTE: For projects subnittvd as Planned Co=unitlos, --(Ira nago Fac uo, sIa r tvalnated pr th. entire project and tht point total shall by applied to each plwve of that rroler O Street Circulation anu Improvements The City Engineer shall review each project in toms of street circulation and by Ica ability to handle the traffic generated by the project A project moat recclvt a minimum of 4 points In this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum) ••• a. Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to s fully Improved major or eecon�ory 1"'igTivay porn — b Traffic generated by the proposed ptoject will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (4 points) c Project Provides street Improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and Safety ti points) ••• d Project vlli build or widen a collector strett or is located adjacent to a fully Improved collector atrv�t ( inn ltel c Project provides wools+ boulevard treatment over and above that required .y the City Standards (2 points) +•• (NOTE: For pro jec to submitted as Planned Cn gnitles, — 3'cieoc CSrcvincfon and Improvement+ shall hr evaluated for the entire project +nd the paint total shall be applf ed co each phase of chit yrojert) 3 Parks and Paths The Co r unlry Development Director shall re+lew each project for its provision of and location to public and /or private parks and usable open space A project moat receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maxioun) a Project provides on or off site public park improv, ments and /or school reereatlonrl facilities (1 POLIO b Proje ^t providea privately osned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point) c Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and /or prly rte park sites with Ia- ma/ntenance foot pathw,ova wherever possible (1 point) Resolution %a 79 -74 Page llb d. Project provides trails or bikewavr. (1 point) e Over 502 of project is located within a 1/2 mile radtue of an existing puhllc park site (? points) ss• f Over 50 :: of prolert is located within a 1/2 mill. ra us o a stun• propn; par to Ow nt g Over 502 of prelect to located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of at existing park site (1 point). see h. Wer SOS o[ prolert Ss located between 1/2 and I mile dif f a fut r Aron s d public Dark H.- (112 point). •ss J. More than 502 of project is located within 1/2 mile of usable Public open space other than public Parke (e g . school facilities, Matioml Poreet, etc.) (1 point) r: (MOTE: F r pr ject s belt[ d as Planned Cosvunitleh, Parks sod Pn[hs shall be evaluated for the entire project and zh point total shall b. applied to each phase of that proteeU . Resolution No 79 -74 Page 12 4 Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Cente. The Community Development Director sholl review each project for its location to existing and o,ture neighhor- hood commercial shopping centers For the purpose of this section, a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall moan a retail center with at leant one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum) a. More than 502 of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points) •ss b. More than 502 of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping cen car (2 points). C More than SOZ of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) s *• d More than 502 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) B Site Orientation and Street Design The Design Review Committee shall review s..te orientation of each project to determine variability of lot sizes and configurations to accommodate terrain and street design, ind also, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variatim s of house designs and orientations (up to 10 points maximum) Lriteria The follouing criteria repreaent the general types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluitlon Project may include other criteria not specifically Mentioned here and still be eligible for the oas'atm comber of points Site Orientation 1 Minimizes crowd ing and vnhanc•_s spatial relationships (c g , by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots) 2 Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing lavout 3. Minimizes sharp angle.! lots ennstltuting poor building sites 4. Deslgno lots,and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation. Resolution No. 79 -76 Page 13 5 Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks. ;roper location of air conditlonleg units, living areas nod the like 6 Creates visuil relief along reeidertfal streets (e g., varying building setbacks, roof aatterrs, landscape treatment, etc ) Street nesiRn 1. The design of street and parking creourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while maintaining acceptable fire response time a. Past through traffic is discouraged by use of curvi- linear street design and other design techniques. b Avoidi short blocks, dead enu and half streets (as opposed to cul-de -sacs) whenever posatblu C. Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d. Parking access is from local streets rather than secondary or mayor streets C Qrdcrly Development The Coalunity Development Director shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than "leapfrog development" •ss Two - thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the pro e—c cat is wirhin 500' of existing development or within 500' of proposed development Which has been approved by the Planking Coemtssion or the Community Development Director. (6 points max lmum) SEMON 7: THRESHOLD POINT LTHIT •es The City council hereby sets a Threshold Point Limit of 68 points for development projects other than custom lot subdivisions, an7T3 points for custom lot subdivisions Resolution No 79 -74 Page 14 ,nu, THEREFORE, nE IT RESOLVED b•: the Winchn Lucnmonga Ltt, lwu nn 11 ae follow: Tiut the Cltv Council ul the C tv of Ranehn Lucamonua herehv adopts Rca„lutton No ''9 -i4 ostabltnhing the R.• =Ldenetal As.csement Svstes —ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this da•• of 1'A9 AYES: ROES: ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor Resolution So 79 -74 Page 15 RFSIDE..TIAL ASSESSMENT RATING. - SLTDIARY CATEGORY Architectural Design MAX. POUNTS PFRCF.TA(L B I PUBLIC SERVICES 10 11 1 C Landscape and Screening Design A. Drainage Facilities 10 (8 pis. min) 11 B. Street CSrculattun and Improvements 10 (S pre min) 11 3; C. Residential Security 1 Police Protection 4 (3 pis min) 4 - 2 Fire Protection 4 0 pre min) 4 4. D Parke and Paths 6 (2pts min) 6 7�: E. Commercial Shopping Centers 3 3 3. F Project Maintenance 3 3.1- 44 -- 40 II. DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design 10 11 11 B Site Orientation and Street Design 10 11 1 C Landscape and Screening Design 30 11.1 D. Energy Conservation 5 S.A." 3S 3b 9: III AFFORDABLE HOUSING 6 6 7^ IY PLANTED C0101UNITIES S PUD••s 1. Planned Communit 3 3.3.' of 2 PUD's 3 3.3. C ORDERLY DEVELOPENE \T 6 b.7' TOTAL: 90 points TURESMOLD POINT LIMIT: 68 points •{ ORDIZIANC•F, NO 78 AN ORnINANCF OF Till' CITY COI %CII ul Till i ITY OF RANCHO COrAMONOA, LALIFORNIA, RICI LATI•11 Tllt sI01L111'. ONF AND SMI OF SAFF AND SA%F r11It6•uRKS wIII11N TIII' I fly 'it RANC110 Crl•4FRINLA rTlu• City Cnunr(1 of file City of Rnit ho Gu arv.n ❑1, l.01turnl.r duvt, ordain a folLw.: StL Fitt% 1: nrdlna•u• 5 , apprrv. 1 .111,1 .111,1 ad,11,ttd flu 1701 day 1 of Nay, 978, Is hcrebt rep.aled SECTION 2: INTENT dNn PURPOSE It is till. latent of tills ordlntm ,• to sat. ga r1 life nr limb, hyilth. property and fuhllc welfare by rcgulatlne tad controlling the .torago. sale, use or discharge of cafe and sine firework, within fill- City of Rancho Cucamonga Sil Tiny 3: FIREWORKS DEFINED A. Dangerous Flr works are those defined in Section 12505 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, and mw not be dlstharpvd in the Cltv of Rancho Cutamonga at anv time 8 Safi+ and sane firvrurke are tho.c defined In Suction 12i0e „f the i,.flth lad Safety Gale of the State of Clltfurnla Safe and same fireworks mat, Ire discharged uithln the City of Pantho Cucamonga during the period h.glnning if 12 00 n.ton on the Mill dtv of June .ud vuding at 12:00 aeon on the 6th dat of July of the ..mc calcudnr year SFCIION ;: SALE OF SAFE. AND SANE FIRIVORKS A Tl,v +a1,1 ••f sale and cam• fireworkt, %hall only be pemitted In t.m.rt lal district% o the CL:I of Rvnho rntam.n.g.i and i% %ubjecl tit all trill lcahle %Lltt laws and rop,lattonn ,fad ill condition, :I lhl% ordlnautc 8. No p,rn..n or parmltlee shall soil nnv safe and cant f Irl•wrk% to a mhvr und,• toe Re of %ixlrvn (16) unl,sn caiJ mtnnr is artompanl.d bt his /,yr parent(q) or gna ,,dl.tn( %) C The east of s.,fo and sane (Irywrk% shall not begln b,-fore 12:110 neon on till- 28th Jav rune and shall not ,.,,•r tool- nft,r 12:111 a in on the 5th day of Jul,, of file %a, calendar wen• S_UT_ W 4 5: LICt4Sf5, PERMITS A9D PRFREOPISITIS FOR SALE OF SAFE AND SASE FIRFI.'OPKS A No p, rc...I all offer for cal, or cl•ti It net ill .ufy .0, . fit .111+ in .,1.1 . • _1 th•nl flr•t hivinc q e L•,I . r uu l .0 urt,l t bu In. 11, -us, from 8.1 ill .1 .. 11, 1, q•, 1. .1 t... uW .•,and p. lmlI fr.- tu• Ia 11 F. il. In.t .... 1 u. tl.. tr 1. 11 Ihrmll 1-1 111 In Ind.J . 11. tr1. tl wiring ftin lilt Bu I Ing or t. 1.11 nagp 2 B Ear apnll. at l nn for th.• sa I nl vafn and ..nil- ((reworks all., he nc, ompnn led b, tilt cc if sots of plot plans and shill set forth the proposed lot at ion of fold safe and sane ffreworks stands C All p,rmltw and llaonvcv shill ctplr, it 11:111 a m on till- 5th Jar of Illy Any permlr ar H%eu,;r ahcll he Ruble,! to .0 p,nsl.m Lc nrdvr .,f the fir, Chl,f or Bullding Ulf t, ia1 if he of ht, duly autlu,rlxed representative hat detrmin,d lhlt illy permithn I,rs r i11,J b. cixnply will$ the tern, and pruvlsioua of this ordiu m,o ur any conditluns of the permit D Temporary, 9a1,9 Tax Permit Required (l) Organiratlons licensed for the selllnp of sate and sane fireworks are required to obtain a tvsportry sales tax permit from till- regional office of the State Board of Equalization E Dlsplav of Business License, Sales Tax Pemit, Fire Dhtrl,t Permit and California Staty Fire Harshal Retail Fireworks License (1) The Llacnsc to sell fireworks, the temporary sales tux permit, the Foothill Fire District permit and 'he California State Fire Marsha.'s Retail. Fireworks License shall be displayed In a prominent place in the firewarks stand F Written permission of the owner of record or lessee of the property of which the safe and sane fireworks stand 1s to be located shall accompany the appllcarlon SECTION 5: INSURANCE REQUIRED A Applicant shill also provide the following at the tire of permit application: L (1) Evidence of public liability Insurance indicating: (a) Nano and aeJress or applicant as Insured or a holder of certiflrate of insurance Issued In connection with a policy carried by a supplier of safe and sane fireworks: (b) That applicant, City of Rancho, Cucamonga, and Foothill Fire Protect on District are Insureds as respects liability arising out of operations and /or a,tivlttes conducted at the location desrrlbcd hotels, or In conlunrtlon with the named lm,ured to whom tills policy is Issued, and/,-r are or use of products purchased from said named insured; ( ^) Period of covctage is 12:01 a.m , June 29. or earlier,to 12:01 a.m , July 15, or later; (d) Name and address of insurance company; (c) Linits of liability of not less than s10o, 000/ $31-0.1-lit public Liability and S50,nW property damage Insurance; (f) r5p,n of Insurance as: 1) Cencral ILrbility includin ^, premises/ nprrat6ms Ilablllty 2) rent ra, tvr 11 Itab Iitty arvcif Ica l I rnf rt•n, foe I odvmnif urn l ton ugra•a'mentx t-1 U1 the CltI of Itin, hn Cut amonga and the Font Is I Fin• Prot. c lnn nl al riot )) Pr W... in 111611 Itv ,n. It lino; Iomrl. ltd opt rat Ions It.lbll It rICt In. it L•n .•t pr ........ II „r• r II l,•o P.. ',,.tf . end I .ter IIrt wn k. tmd" (,•v.t t dv. rlpt lun of to at I".I (h) tttat not ,mss tine thiriv (In) dive+ wrt %t , prior mot ve I , 'ottilatlnn nr mart-rlal clung, In covrrap• Iv provldtd to tin• Cltv of R.nllrlla Cucaaong.I and the Foott.l It Fire District and /or each additional insored it dfcoted in the certLocate o, Insortn,c SECTION 7: OPERATTON OF STAND A Staffing (1) No person below the age of eighteen (18) years shall, at anv time, be or be permitted Inside said stand or to assist in tbt handling or sale of safe and sane fireworks B Lgltlan (11 All refill snow% of s.lit- and s.tne Fireworks shall he Fernl[ted on'v fre•v within a terlporary safe and ewe fln•w,•rks at.nd Salts from anv other buildi.g ' nr structure are hereby prohibited (2) N,• safe and the farvoorks stand shall he located vlthLn twenty -five fvt ('S') of an) ou,• bulltNnp• nor within twenty -five feet (25') of any Ignition source which -,old Ileht or dlsrh.rrge safe and sane fireworks• nor within on, hung -ed feet (100') of anv premisea where (Ilmnibie Itgnids are dispensed Minimum sefhau it,, street curbing or shot-tiler x11,111 ht tom feet (10') (3) Said safl and sane fireworks stands shall be so lornted ns to provtdr raft .o d rea.onih(a• Inpr•es and egress thereto and to comply with the other rr,elslons and terms of 'his ordlnante Said stands shall be located subst..ntlally at that place indicated on the approved permit for such safe and sane ((reworks stand U) 51r Ir.1L- stands shall not be located closer than throe hundred feet WWII apart e f.•n.trurt ion L (1) SIf, Ind .m, fireworks stand%, a•: tvrpor..ry .t rum term., shill nut he sublc, t to tilt, terms and ...... ten ,t t•••• not IdI nI; F..d, of , Ity, 11"'I It 1111, 111 th, ,•,oars, t lon of to n+ nent strut lures I.. '..I Will P..vld, .1, howovt r, tit it ill xwrb .1 o,lt lit tr•, till no•Ar tilt- %twervi, on of ill,- ¢ u11In, off it oil tn: Fir, Fhlet. the sh 111 nguln• %o,I .t -nul, to h constr.. till In a m.mnvr which Ill 11 reason obiv Ill the - utfet, of attendants and patron. Pace S t1) All ,ill hiss shall he Invtal ltd and maintained in nccordmor wl th tt,e Bni lJ tog red, or .n ld rIty, r,ccpt that all ehetr(tnl clr, ult, enterinp ouch At and, ,h III be ,onner I,d t rn,n;h fuse, or rlr aIt hrcak••r•, n ,t to ox. , rd (If, •n (1%) ,np, n•s whon toe dl, tans fns the stand t, ,he 0m4,r of elvet rl, al lu,w,•r ex, et d, one hnndrrd 1„t (100'), a h+nporary el r, IrI, ,I pews polo or generator Act ,hall b, pn,v idrd I1) No -tnnd 01.111 have a floor ar a In vxce„ of three hundred tu% -ntv (320) square feet (4) Loch ,taod nnst have at 1, .1,t two (1) ,tits, thirty Inches (30 ") in unobstructed width All rxlt doors sl.all remain unlocked at all tin•, when stands are oce toted Exit doers shall by cpenab!e fro, the fm We without the ese of a key or am .pedal knuvledgv or effort Ill, re shall in , +alntalned a thirty inch (3011) unobstructed alAlewav from all parts of the ,land to tell door, Each ,land In excess of fora feet (409) In length mast have at least three (3) exile, spored approxlt tely equal distance apart, provided, however, that in no case shall a person have to travel a distance exceeding twenty -four feet (24') to reach an exit D. Fire Protection Appliances (1) Each stand shall be provided with two (2) two and ono -half (1S) gallon water pressure type fire exttogui,l,ers, In good working order and eislly accenslble for ese In case of fire r Security (1) !fetal fly screens, with not lea, Own 18 x 16 mesh it Openings. shall be provided to cover all oper areas on the Inside of the bouthn where safe and Fane fireworks are stored or offered for $otI- The duly exception to this regnlrement is the dlspen,ing arms to which the puolie must 1•ave access (2) E• -h stand mutt have an adul, wat,hnan or arten,lant in attendan,e and In charge thereof at all tine, while safe and sane fireworks are stored therein to touking, living or Sleeping facilities 01111 be establi,hee or maintained within any stand No watchman or gua.rd shall ,levp Inside any such tand F l'ehiclea Parking on Prcnl scs (1) There shall be no vehicle parking or parking of gna„1 Inc, generator or ary type of flammable liquid coetalners within !went% -five feet (259) of any hurt, stand Some fem of phynical barrl,nde shall be provided to maintain this 1 .Io I,,, ul L 0 R,rm•II of rmbu,tlbly, (1) All w.,d, and cv-bu•tlble notetlal, net Including At runt urea, ,lull 1,• rer,oved from the Illation of th,• stand for a mil lnum distance of twenty -five feet (15'1 suirount ln;t the stand ordinan,e \,• )v P mo i (') All t r 1 h 4h 111 1• r n, vl•d I n n I I.• s if a and •tittle• I Irul•rk4 ,tnust std ills prml..4 , it h even I,% It the , Ilse rl hu41 n. 4w u P, hilt .-I "1•) SIMM" Sll :r (I) "RII VS)KI YI" fit I: VItII I, Ite I4 III 111, 1•Iw frl ") r I,1 II, LIII 6, In rmllL"II .II pl n..l.•n III X12,4 IIs Ili. 4I1, .1111 .In,• fln..,rkw ntdnd, Kith Inw id, and nntsid RI, p, rwcn s11t11 Irw,kv nr hn n. any . Igorettes, Olg lr4. pips is Ill:ht ,af, and sme• f Ir.a•ris, m.aebl•I .,r In, ether m.n•r1,I wllinu „ h It o.d rt1 within a Ilatam v Of teen y -1 Ivl. 1 ,•t ('i') •,,rrosndsng s ",h stand I Al, onol 1. R, vI r it. v (II the ,.•nwnnpt inn of lilt II I,e'I 1, h, etc lgrs sh.tli be pr,11.Iblted In Jnd aroused nut• Rafe ana sane I lrevn•rks stand 1 Slora4e of Sill, and Sane Fir--works (I) Safe and sane ftrevorks shall be atorrJ only In the 4afe Ind cane fir,vorks Stat.d It Stull be unlawful for any pernon to store nnfe and vane I tnvorks to ally h,111 ding, r"idcnrc, gar. ge, [,. ss not nmnhl is, tra 11, r, all ntv other vehle le wlthtn the City of RJncnn ,rung t, vxre pt It— te- eporncy storig. of small giant It lew In I residence during the prrbd of ports tt,41 Sale, an dt•l lord In Section 4C 1 K Removal of Uns,lld St.lek l (1) All tot -Ild <tn,k shall be remavrd from the location Av +1:00 risen m1 the 6th d.tv of July L Lt., t 6nJ ROx roil of Safe anti Sine Firewnrkv blond (1) W, sit, and wane flt.1,rk,, sta ld Shell be Instal lwd prior l., 1_:00 neon nn list 20th day Of June acid cool sulh ItJad shall hr rem„ved fr,m the ttmporury lot Itlnn by 11 on noon nn III, 7th day of July Of th,• same ,alt.1ar ve., SP TIn,4 R: P" :WIKITIONS oX nl S(IL1RbE A It 41.111 h, ,Inllwful fo any person Ignitr, explode, prelewt, or Otlorwlta• Ili• or use ulr safe and Sane flrtwrk4 or p,rmit this Ignitlun, esploslon or pro)eetlon I h, roof upon, nvor, or Onto tht prop,rly of another wlth,•nt Ilk sonernt, or to ignitO, explode, project, or oth,•rwl,st f.ry or make uv, of env S:fv and Sane flI4u,rks vltl.ln ton r,et (10'1 of an, resldto.e, dw, I lnc, or -,list r trill. tare ust•I av a place of blbitatlou 1,• I.-man lining. 0 �.• t 111'- k shell n.•I h. III Ihve•d vllbin m h. el I I v.r,l ,n 1 ill . il•I , It%. as •le sign led uvl wh.nn v 11. fir. PI rv, otI .0 Burt u. map dt Ilo. Y•.. I- III 11, ill 11ri r etat l.,o e_ ', 961' Son Be rnard lnr R I. e. , , .1'o, . ...•. If II ire her I.d weld r,.n It II• - , •u.h d14, Isar gt I 6 r An-. nlnor I nde r fit. n• I.,. I I I I,•1 If n. ..1 a• uul . m. I I r a.rVI, J. .I I h, nnl r t... nn. r r I.... .•..II 11 L'.• r.r n, I r-. I mI .11 .....l. t I 11.1.1. I I 1 � I, � �, n.• a •.r••.1 Ilr r ,I .1 ... Ian3 r••. Ir _••rY w I.LIII Ilu I IIV •1 Rrn In .,,. .w ,.... ' 0.. F. Iv (I."t n 1.1 .A.1 wdh•.,.. •1 , r ..I.91, aI..II +a•1 ra•, t'v, 111111 of .nn+, r. 1.. r " „1 . tbI .•al„ n.• of it., •NI. r, 311 It,. t a „1 ..11 .n.I . u Ilr. -mrt. .Irnd •, II,, d or .1 r b. l✓ In vlwl It inn at tl.lq .•rdlomv l• S °(11(1;1 7: Pt%, %11`r� A P •... 1 ing t. 1. nrw lnan. gLlll c, n .A W -11 l l of 1 of ad •neanq[ a.,J. o,— I on, I, r 1. o 1. ,rent nhall nn r,.nlrl+ed by a fine nit t ' d si!rl',nf1, Of hY I ^Pr I. m.rnt In the Gw3gty jail for a P•rl -1 not to eXceed Chlrty 130) d r hot?, a. 3 f,n. and I ^.• unr•enl o er rlol It l.•.. 1 if.. 1 Inar Pr(.vl . nq "'all ue faille in% tho II . n„ • • In r"nkrd SECTM 11 rhI• Ki vor 0.111 a1Rn thl. 4 I n l n.-.n, and thr rl[v flerk .11111 at togt to Ihr aa, and the Utv rinrk h3 I I vur the c.-1 -, to M Pohl law.•d within fifte, (15) da•.+ niter It^ MacrGa•, V It nqt on. ,• In 7114 11311 R.2.•rr t eewPaP•r of 3loot rtl air. oliti, Pohl I. I, I In I-, fit of rn.trl , Ctl lfornla, and It nl it I In toy Cit of Rm. hr Cw, .,nza. r,l It ortda PASSrn, ArPR(lt'rn, Aitn AIXIPTrn thlq 'eip q., 11f ttr' tglq ASTSt Sth:oaner, Palnoho, Hlkela, erl•re, •rogt. WES: }lone ArSr'iT: !:one All Si• f 1 FROG M up OF R ...rs.:s2,Z� Council: Per the suggestion of the Hayor, I added the issues and alternatives instead of =king reference to then. Therefore, pages 6 through 10 set forth this addition September 19, 1919 CITY OF R,LCCHO CUCMUNCA CITY COUNCIL MINUTIS 0..•guldr Mcntin N. L 1`0 ORDER - ,,,,utar meeting of the City Council sae held In the multi- purpose room at Carnollan l,- vut.,ry School, 7105 Carnollan Streat, Rancho Cucamonga, an Wednesday, September V) 1979 The mating was called to order at 7:08 p m. by Mayor Jamca C. Frost led In the pledge of allegiance to the flag aunt: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikols, Palombn, Bridge and Mayor Frost Also re,•nt were: City I ,eager Laurcn Wasserman, City Attorney Sam Crows, Assistant ,.t, 4,nager Jim Robinson, Community Development Director Jack Lan, City Engineer ••.I 'uhbs, Finance Director Harry Empey, Community Services Director Bill Holley .111rot,l of Minutes of August 29, 197a and Septe4',er 5, 1979 Y.otion: Movea 1y kela seconded by Palombo to approve both sets of minutes Motion carried 5 -0 1c \IRIRCCMLWS. 4r Holley anrouncet that the Community Services Building should be completed by .CVO:LCr 14 There had seen delays in shipment of materials which accounted for tho atra time t special meeting of the Planning Conctission at 7:00 p m. on Thursday, bepterhor it the Neighborhood Co:avnity Facility at Arrow and Archibald Wvlsory Committee i eting on Thureday. September 20 at 6:30 p m. in the :',rary Conference Room. r m William Lyon Company will bp caking a presentation on their special project r tlw,mda on October 4 at 7:00 p m. to be held at the Middle School in F,tiwanda •lik,•is announced he will be attending the SLAG General Assembly Meeting on t,,b,r 1 -4 ,vnr announced he and several staff members had attended a League of Califorifa i .',olar enorgv workshop on Friday. September 14 'tr 4asaermn requested item 4 -c be removed it= the Consent Calendat ainat I al ,ten approved at the previous meeting 401ITTEF REPORTS ldvlaory Comitree - non ularari:al Commission Mr Gorczyca reported the Cw nlsslon was working on a •mt,nsous Inventory of historical sites in the area On October 9 they would be •nvl4ring an historical landmark designation for the Alta Loma railroad station L, "INSFN7 CAL NDAR Ilket, requcsted items "d" m,d "I" be removtd for further dlacuncfon. 1 r City Coun'll Minutes September 19, 1979 Page Ajmra.al of warrants In the .,mount of 5197.495.9? ReRlstvr No 79 -v -1'1 b Claim igaInnt the City In the _anoint of 530.000 by 9arah Jeanie Petrc; by torwaNvd to CI'v At[nrn.•y far Onndling c UMIoal. to .,,k ngnte,I .],:It r r l (t) tack Approved in 1979 -80 Budget. g. Approval of Agreement with Rancho Cucamor.•:a thambur of_ Commerce _ Request for approval of the trannter of funds to •hc try for the Industrial Specific Plan and authorize MAyor to stgn agreements It Approval of Agreement with Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Comerce hequeat approval and authorize Mayor to sign agreement to transfer funds in the amount of $43,000 for the purpose of the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Model 1 Set October 3. .979, for public hearing for Zone Change ZONE CHANGE HO 79-08 - MERIDIAN - A Change of zone from A -1 (limited Agriculture) to M-2 (Heavy Industrial) for 38 56 acres of land located on the north side of Arrow, 1,300' cast of I -15. Request Approval and nuthortre Kivor co slca annual renewal of Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds k Acceptance of Parcel Map 5194 - The Parcel Map was tentatively appro%ed by the City Engineer on July lb. 1979 The land division is located on the south side of Math Street vest of Hellman Avenue consists of 6 2 acres and 8 lets The condition of approval required the development ei a now street named "Flower" The developer. Howard Mucks, has submitted bonds for security as follows: - Perfo too nce Bond (Road) $17,n00 Labor d Material (Road) $17,000 RESOLUTION NO 79 -76 A RESOLUTION OI THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`iONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP h•IIHOER 5194 (TES-rATIVE eARCEL NAP Nn 5194) I Release of Bond for County Minor Subdivision H77 -0703 (Northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street) it is recommended that the City Council direct the City Clark to notify the Bank of America to release the 526,000 let_er of credit In favor of Douglas Hone, Kathleen Ilona and Doug as Gorgon. m ROleaVe of Bond for County Minor Subdivision 77 -0559 (Southeast corner of "so Line and Archibald) It is recnnmended that the City Council direct th" City Clerk to notify Bank of America to release the set - ae etter of L 58,200 in the name of Oounlns Ilene due to the replur•ment by 5onds from Otvcrsiflod Tovestn•rt City Coun.11 41nutes Syptenber 19. 1979 P.tge 3 I RCN-Ia LWn .11 futon[ t•- %t. .it, , Part Ian .I R,nv,n it ro.•t - irnct 9'.4 It t s n•, asm•ndLd that t4.• I I t v Gmpetl ,pprnrvr the 14•ealut la-, of tn., nt lon to varato R.Otym <trt•et uul a,t thv pistil 1. Iw.irina tar 14U,bcr It 1979 F RtSOLIT V IOY , 79- t IA RFSOI.TIOl OF THE LM COLNLIL OF THE (IVY OF RA.N1710 L'1 CA.iONGA COI'NTY Of SAN 8ER,'L%KDINO, �TATC Id I.,YLIFORNIA, uECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VALATE A VORTIUN OF BANYAN STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP NO V -003 FILE IN THE OFFILE OF THE CITY CLERK 4ntion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Cilendar. Motion carried 5-0 Item "d" -- Mikels questioned section p on the agreement with Sedvay /Gooks for the completion of the general pia. Mr Lam explained the consultants worked far and sent all information to the city stiff who in turn distribut•td and re- leased the information The consultant could not given any Sufomation out to anvono except the City Total cost would be $112,000 4otton: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to approve the contract with Sedway /Crake for the completion of tha General Plan and preparattan of the LIR and to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement Motion carried 5-0 Item "f" — After discussion Council concurred the approval of the contract with MKCK for a fiscal impact model should be continued to the October 3 .coring with changes in the contract to include that the consultant would_ Se working with the Council along with the city staff Mr Lam suggested using the term "City" instead of city staff 4ation: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to continua item to the October I meeting. 4otioh carried 5 -0 4r Wasserman encouraged Council to contact city staff with an; questions and au¢gestions before the next meeting i. PUBLLC HEARINGS 5A. Zone Change Nn. 79 -06 by Westway Investments A request to change the zoning from M -R to M -I for property located on the south side of Sth Street between Hellman and Arch1 Id Avenues O :dlnance No 83 before Council for second reading Jack lam •esented the staff report He explalied the item had been held over from the August 1st meeting because the applicant had needed more time to recordthe covenant, conditions and restrictions This had now been a.compllnhed. L 'vor opened the meting for public hearing. There being no comments, the public hearing was closed `lutton: Moved by Palembi, seconded by Bridge to approve Ordt dance No 83 and -.rive entire reading Motion carried by the following vale: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palo:bo. Bridge, Frost NOV: None ABSENT: lone Title and number r.-ad Lv Waaycrnan City Council Minutes September l9, 1979 Page ORDINANCE NO 83 fvernnJ reading) AN ORDINANCF OF THE CITY rouNCIL OF TIIF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONT7A. CALIFOH41A, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS :09- 171 -n7 AND 709 - 171 -7U FROM M -R TO 4 -1 FOR 18 15 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET BETWEEN HELLN.IN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE 59 Ordinance No 70 -B hefore Council for second reading. An atrondoent to the r original historic preservation ordinance to include designation of points VIII` of historical lntertst Hr Holley presented the staff report Hayor opened the meting for public hearing There being no co®ents, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Mlkels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordtnancs No 70 -8 and waive entire reading Motion carried by following vote: AYES Schlosser, Mlkels, Palo,bo, Bridge, Frost NOES: None ABSENT: None Title and number read by Wasse roan. ORDINANCE NO. 70 -B (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ANENDI%C ORDINANCE NO 70 rREATING AN HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMISSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACTTf TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES A." SITES AND TO )LYTIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 70 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. iC. (2rdinance No. 85 before Cotinctl for second reading An ordinance declarinA certain acts to be unlawful within public parks in the City of Reecho Cucamonga Staff report by Bill Holley Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing There being no comments, the hearing was closed Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Pn.ombo to approve Ordinance No 85 and waive entire reading Motion curled by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels, oalombe. bridge, Frost NOES: None ABSENT: None Title and number read by Wasserman ORDIN.I.NLE NO 85 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC,INONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UN- LAWFUL WITHIN THE LI4ITS OF CITY -OWNED OR - OPERATED PARS OR OTHER RECREATION FAfiLIL.VS AND PROVIDINr, PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION THEREOF. 5D. Ordiianre No. 86 before Commeil for first reading. An ordinance establish - Inc, the reslu' �ntial growth management plan and Resolution No 79 -74 which L csoablighea a restC-ntlal assessment rating system. Havor stated there would not he a first reading thlg evening Council would listen to input and then come back for first reading later Me Lam made the staff presentation outlining the growth management plan and the changes which had been miJe in the ordinance City staff had rIet with several groups during the week, and Me lam also presented a list of issues and alternat Eves to the Coun, it which had cone out of these rretings 4 } City Counctl Minutes September l9, 1979 Purge 5 flag was oponed to Council to ark staff quvstt,mt. Th, •c von• none. 9 ,..r Jltd n recess at 8:15 p m• The rm•etlng n,ont• ted at 8:10 n a with all .nn, tr .0 the Council ind ,tilf present `It . •.ned the meeting for pub I lc hear Ing r r -•m u,•mpe 1, Chat roan of the Ptann ing CoanLseton, made Rome introductory comments 1,11 .,,ne background to the growth management plan .. mover, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, requested •ao,II to [able the Item for at least two weeks to allow the Chamber time to .-,,it it the amendments and problems ,nird Corczyca, Chairman, of the Historical Commission, stated that in section B -4 t4,• .ord. "historical," should be . +dded Kin .illis, BIA, also requested that Council table the item at least two weeks In .rdor for them to look at the recormendatfane made by the staff .,,o to•mr. representing the Ontario- Chino Board of Realtors, requested a con - ttmlance In order to work with the Chamber of Comeetce in evaluating the recoands- :mona •m. it Considered whether to hear public Input on the Resolution at this him t is decided to proceed, and Mayor closed the public hearing on the ordinance it +ened the public hearing on the Resolution I, •. lortero member of the Alta Loma Advisory Committee, suggested a warantee ,t, + be lnc,uded + Ills stated they also were concerned in the area of waranteas and tht_ this t m of national concern 711ere was a national Insurance program available t,.t tic local groups had been invited to Join fie stated that locally the Levis . d the best varantee program and naked Mr Ralph Lewis to explain his r,rn Ir wts suggested that varantees not be a part of she point system. He pointed it .tt the HOW (Home Owners varantee) program was very expensive for the builder I.• it I his organization tried to stand behind their products for a reasonable if time it +I lm hearing vas closed . I: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to continue the public hearing e October 7 meeting an Ordinance No 86 and Resolution No 79 -74 ,n•mril deliberated whether to give the ordinance first reading and wait in the n solut L.•n This would give them additional time to work on the problems before ,I e Rshltng ordinance vent into effect Mtkels suggested that Council shoulC the .tine tnput to staff so the revisions in the ordinance and resolution woald ,,•t it the wishes of the Council r ml nm6n withdrew hi, R..nnd on the original motion Call was made 'or another ,unit. Haver Frost seconded the motion. The motion to continue the public hearing 2 I mho October 1 meeting an the Ordinance and Resolution was approved by the L „ hoeing vote: AYES: Schlosser, Palanbo, Bridge, Frost NOES: Militia (he felt t4,••,rdinance could pass the first reading will, some discussion) ll.els suggested some modifications in section, 11-2 ind R -9 of the Resolution. s.,tlon B -2 should he worded "to help lnsore idequ.te school facilities are y .n,vt l,d " Sc:tLm 0 -9 "to enrourage hould be added 3 a `lotlos: 'laved by Mike IR. seconded by Palumbo to approve the above changes to S' v. t ns R -- and 9-9 Motlon tarried by toll.,vinR vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mtkels, pmlt-ho, Urtu;,e, and Frost COFS: None ARSI \r: None City Connell Minutes September 19, 1979 Page h )Ilk, 1s guestioned its- „rder .•t h -h ml I He Ivit thv ordvr hould ho revervvd III- .Iddrvased the qurvtlon , t whetterr t ,•,rnitment to in a..Vg4c .t dlntrf, t was rev, rsahly t,, III,- Itv .[,.Italy the , Itv rlt .Irury 4a1J any , onwitmvnl wo„Id ho candltl.,nil gin,. ,I1 rhr- I,,d to be ex•t ane,yav Mikols did nor pursoo the Issue Mlkels questioned the wording In Section 7 It JLnv,,r 4m ;re•[ed the sect iun be reworded Mlkels expressed .onrem that t projer: of lover points could pre.-apt a prof, t with higher points Amply hetause of the postttun of having been delayed from another period Motion: Moved by Mikela to have staff revise language In entire section 7 -A find bring back to Council 4ikc$s questioned JaOk Lam It the staff had exhausted all alternatives in [he issue. Mr. Lam pointed out t•ere was another alternative to have all applications, even those coming from a prior period, be treated equally within that period It would be by total competition within each period Palombn suggested that Council sit down In a work sesnion to work out these issues Mlkels said Council should give staff some direction on the ordinance now Bridge expressed that thov shnnld go with a total competition plan Council concurred to have stuff come back with altermttven for the underlined sections Mlkels withdrew his motion Havor then vent over the issues and alternative lint which had been presented earlier ht 9r Lam Louncll concurred with the cavorts comxnts which were: 1SSvC 1: Prlortty of Allocation of Sewer and Sthnol Facilities Section 7 of the Growth Management Oralnnnrc ostsbllshez a priority for allocation of school and sever facilities to the event such facilities are unavailable to approved projects The tssuu tas been raised that in the event a Planned Community receives the highest point total in a review period, that project might obtain all tM available allocation for that review period ind possible, for successive review periods at the exclusion of other Jeveloprents (smaller projects) Alternatives: A tstabli4h a percentage of allocation per review period over which no One applicant tan receive further allotation tot example, during any review perlarl no one aopllrar.t can receive core than XX of the available alloritlon This ensures that no one developer will acquire all the available allocations within a review period g Eatabli ^.h too categories of allocation: (1) Planned Cosntnitt es, and Q) All other development The total allocation would be split between the two (e g X: to Planned Communities an: Y: to all other developers) Within vn,h category, no one project Could t.ceive more than ZZ of the total available This ensures that both tit, PI coned Communities and all other developers would he given a chanre to build C All residentiil levelopn,nt projects which a•et or exceed the thresh - hold point limit and ret„dvt approval within anv single review period that pirtlt ipate In a non- nreforv,it tall non- e«1u41ve "equal participation to all" 4olutlon to th 501001 nd /or water and Mower facility impaction pro- blem, icceptible ht tho 4thoO1 •Ilstrl.ts and CCWD will be allocated school and /or sever and water ,101,1ty bas :d an their perrentago of participation to the I01"Llon Prov(d.d Chit such all.Iontlon 4hill go to those projects having the highest point r it Ing fact, partlripant4 contribution hhall be based on in equal proport on ut the whole giving rio preference to size or flnanttal contribution This alternative would ellnlnatc the last paragraph on Page 109 of the agenda packet. L I It, CaoN 11 Al nut e4 1,•ntonhrr 19. Ig79 P t.,• . , It, nut Range Lh, Jro to u4,• u1 rt•,,mnrnd it ton %: is n.l ier %II o.,r t1torn Hlv,•% inn ha%,• t de, Islon on . tits of e.oh •n n, II had prevl ous It tgra•,d this S, tt ton 7 -A ov, Jed to he rwnrked I[ <19 `.0. Requlrctw•nt W l,honl l.ortllf, itinn Prior to Rcri Ival of Setn•r t `r ._ _— "•.tlon 5, Kindatory Criteria. requires that the school rertificattcn be met ,rt„r to obtaining sever letter+ The suggestion hag been broached chat the utpiL.ant obtain sever le Ltery first, and then the school letter tl t.•rnatives: 1 'Io not change this section of rho Ordinance Schools will issue eeett- I,.n lette.e only .hew thelt requirements have been met The issuance of tool certification letter before n sever letter is n statement of City policy :rat the school issue is paramount at this time In the City's development %mend Section 5 -B, last sentence, to read: "Written certification or ovi- 'en.e of Agreeovfnts from the school district that the applicant agrees to ,operate and partl 1pate in a solution to the school problem (signed by the ,•,plicant and the s.hool districts) be obtained prior to meeting criteria 'C' " .I, amndwnt would further clarify this criteria and at the same time insure gat each applicant will work with school districts to provide school t,tlltles 'iq alternative emphasizes the City's position relative to the school issue ,.it, requiring applicants to agree to worl wit`i the school districts A n.tl certification would still be required for the issuance of n building ,t•rnit ,it L's recorc ndatlon: Adopt Alternative B. •e 11 had discussed this issue earlier in the meeting .cIL NO 1: CowninitvDevelopment Director dertermination of the Point Ratings. issue has been raked that Section 7 of the Growth 8anagerent Ordnance tlluvs the Coc+munity Development Director too much discretion to date mining L., point ratingn %It rnat Ives: A ,emend Section 7. Paragraph 1, of the Ordinance to recd as follwst "M 1 appli,ations tor re.,dential development projects shall be rated by the A• %ldcntlal Aetsrasmant Stem adopted by the City Council " and amend Section 7. Paragraph 5 of the Ordinance to read as fall"%: L Ithtn 5 daas after the point rating determination, the Co=untty Develop - -,•nt Director shall .au•e a written notice Since the point rating svgtem Is t vvnthcglq of the varleuq Cltv departwats and dtvlatons review of projects, It In more pruper to indlerte that the review is by the system rather than the Derr, for ht.atf'a re",nxendjrldpl %.lopt the I,sncr w ligt,J .tbovo Council , uuorred with t u, recommendation City Council Hinutes September Ia 1979 Page 8 ISSUE. NO. 4_ Appeal. are oo_n_rtrlcttve cnnngb Thv Issue is .hat any aggrieved pervun, groups. • . may appeal no,, point rating. at a project The Poss14111ty vxlsts that builders with lower scores might appeal the point ratlugs to builderm with higher scores to hold tip proresvlog, and then, hold oil. approv,l of the higher rated project Alternatives: According to the City Attorney, the City In regnlred by State law, not to be unduly restrictive of any appeals Tic City must allow nny and all aggrieved person+ the right of appeal Staff's rtcorr:endation: Leave section as in Council concurred with the recommendation. ISSUE NO. 5: Time Limits 2L Zro Lect approval do not take into ccount the noaslb111ty of unavailable school or never fact Litles. Section 10, Time Limits of Approval, require expiration of a residential development projecr after twelve (12) months from date of approval, unless an catenaion is granted The issue is, that if sever or school facilities remain unavailable for 12 cwnths, then projects will automatically expire Thus, an "implied moratorium" is created, which prevents a developer from acting upon his project. Alternatives: Section 66452 6A of the State Subdivision Nap Act, "stops the clock "(dooe not penalize the applicant in regard to time lose) on a tentative tract map in the event water and sever facilities are not avaliable Shortage of school facilities do not "stop the clock" on a tentative tract, thus, the time limits of approval would remain in affect. An applicant may request a time extension by an additional 18 months allowing for a total expiration time of 30 months Staff's recommendation: Leave Section 10 as to Council concurred with this recommendation ISSUE h0. 6: The drainage criteria is perceived to be unfair to the smaller ro eat.. It is perceived that awll projects "lose" 5 points in this category, even if there are no drainage problems Alternatives: Increase the point total of criteria 1, (1 e. project has adequate drainage), from 5 points to 8 points, decrease the point total of criteria 2, (i.e. Haster Planned Facilities) from 8 points to 2 points, eliminate Cr1te-in 7 and allow this category to be additive This allows smaller projects to gain a larger percentase of points while at the same time not removing thr incentive for applicants to provide Raster Planned Facilities and /or solve downstream drainage problems Staff's recomr,endatton: Adopt this alternative Council con, urred with the recommendation. 11 City Connc/i Minutes Sepremhrr Iv, 1979 P.eae •) IShlif SO. 7: _Stnvat fin vlar_Inn and Imnrvncnts is n.rro lvd M1r be_ml_�[r thn •emaller r._L.__ts - "tt lssee rnls•d here Ix +tml life to ht dnintr, question A project that is no cirrola'ture prohl.•ns 1-, perceived to "inns" 6 point It It In nor •o• rted on a mijur• sete.ndary mr roll •i ter il teradtiven: Ralso the points at criteria ' (1 a project +Ill nor trcate ••.•rload of street system) tram h points to i polnt•t and nine the points at rlterla 4 (1 prolecty on niilector ntrvetm) it= 2 pot is to 1 points ;,Ldlf'v recormrndattnn: Adopt this Alternative Council concurred with this In•aommendatton TNSUE SO. 8: The Definition of Orderly Development is too restrictive. Pn•sently, tho Orderly Development Section allows points for the percentage " the patimeter of the project that abuts existing development. It may not tike- into account infill projects which may have a vacant parcel adjacent or •urrounding It. but for all intent and purposes will not create excessive +train on public facilities Utornatl is: Amend Paragraph 2 of the Orderly Development Sections (Section 5 end 60 .o read as follows: "Two thirds of a point will be granted for each 102 of the perimeter of the ,ruject that 11 wlthlt 500 feet_ of axtetint develonmen .r within Snn' nr 'n.• Curunt ter Development Dlrvctor (6 points maximum) ' ',I. amendment would require the following amendment of Section IC(I), P„Iice Protection: •'i Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed develop- -,-tie that has received approval by the Planning Commission or r=unity 0,:velopment Director on over 70% of its perimeter (2 points) " "Project site 1s withl, 500' of exiecing development or proposed development thit has received approval by the Planning Commission or Community Develop - ,en Director between 252 and 702 of its perimeter (1 point)." nis recorrwndatton: Adopt this Alternative Council concurred with staff's r., ocrendat ton ISSUF 50 9: Parka and Paths ..Ithln the Parks and Paths Section, more emphasis shoild be given to those developments closer to existing parks than Proposed future parks Alternatives: Amend Section 1D, Parks and Paths, to read an follmv: "5 Over 502 of project is located within 1/2 mile of an existing public park site (2 points). L 6 Over 502 of project In located within 1/2 mile of a future proposed park (1 ,elto point) Over 502 of prnjert is locatod between 112 and 1 mile of an existing public perk rite (1 point) i. Over "0.: of prn)oct is looted between 112 and 1 mile of a future proposed Public park site (112 point) " Stiff Iecurnend etlnn: *Um. nding Section In ix strted above Council concurred with the reconmenuitton City Council Minutes September 19, 1979 Page 10 ISSUE NO. 10: Net hborhood Comer, l.11 Shnppl� lcote [s Within the Neighborhood Cormerctnl Sbnpptug t'.mt, r, more emphasis rhonld be pl toed on existing shopping enters than on pt coned future shopping centers Altern,tives: Amend Se.tlon IF, Net,,hborhond C.m ,r, 1,1 Shopping Centers to road as follows: "' More than 502 of project is within 2 miles of an existing no Rhbor- hood commerrinl shopping center O points) r 2 More than 502 of project with within 2 mites of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) 3 Moro than 505 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). G More than 502 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a Planned future neighborhood commerical shopping center 0 point). 5 Project to more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) Council concurred with the recommendation to amend Section IE as above. ISSUE N0. 11: Clarification of Design Review Intent There is a desire to clarify -o Intent of the Design Review Section of the Growth Man,gexat Plan since nu points a-e asaignod to the criteria It was the desire of the Planning Commission that any design review process created by the City should not dictate a saxnesa of design from project to project Therefore, by not "signing po nts to the criteria, the Crowth Management Plan me rely establishes generul perimeter@ by which a review may be made "It Is not the intent of the Growth Management Plan to dictate a particular architecture nor to use certain price mter'ols nor dictate specific de@rgn solutions It is the intent of the Growth Management Plan to fuater creative design solutions " Staff's roco ndation: Add the above to Geetlon 2, Design Quality Council concurred with staff's recommendation Mayor called a reeesa at 10:20 p m. Moo irg rv.unvened at 10:35 p m, with all Council and staff members present 7. STAFF REPORTS 7AA. Zoning Determination for Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association. A request for zoning determination at to whether or hot the Popoff Association use Is .allowable to the R -i zone Item was continued from the September 5 me ing. harry Ilogan, Senior Planner, prusenttd the star` report Re pointed out the issue was to determine whether the protect was '.e considered as a "church" wht.h would be compatible With the R -I zoning o. .1"mmerrtal venture " The Planning Commission had determined by a split vote that the use would be I similar to a hutch The concern was that perhaps this use Was a commercial L activity which had a church and was not appropriate for that area Mutton: Moved by Aridge, seconded by Palumbo that the Peter Popoff Evangelistic 0.ssortation was charetterlstic of a church activity and conatetent with the R -1 zone t.tty Council Minutes Svotember 19, 1979 Page I I n..ug Ias irutt, a Cl a rt•m.snL aLtnrnvv rep resent Ing the- Pupo(I File ud it l not nWrrsneJ rise Caunr I 'L4 lanl The- nrtglunl nut 19-n thnt tills vas ih tras torl,t lr of i rhur.b mII vl ty 1.11 . -nsf stvnt with th he• e x -I one was d.•L•u vJ by t to!l.s.ing Visit- : AYES: 'Ids•. Pnlombn NOFS: Srltlu-tswr. MlkvJ,,. Frost ABSf Mi: Nutty I. t.m: Moved by Mlkels. meetn.Jed by Schlosser to table the Item and to -Id.r at the October I meeting. Mullen rarried by :he to luving vote: 111 S: , %'ilvsser. YLkols. Frost NOES: Bridge, Palumbo `Ir Scott asked this to be changed to Lha October 17 meeting since he would I,,- nut of tam October i. Mot l.tn: Moved by Mikela, seconded by Schlosser to change rho dote that the It.n would return to Council to October 17 Motion carried by following vote: %YI.q: Schlosser HLkels. Frost NOES: Palumbo. Bridge sis. Prnnosal far on ordinance nrovfdinR far the control, collection, sad .Il rp „cal of rctiee Question before Council vas should the City of Rancho Ineamonga franchise refuse o orators. Harry Empay presented the staff report Mr ':asou mnii made sow additional comments on the theory of open compatltion. He also "olnted out that: (a) rates were determined by the County, therefore, all ., ^panic+ have the same rates; (b) city would have authority to help solve '.-plaints. (c) some tteighborinods have different companies serving them a 'iv spare. (d) rate increases Ar. determined by the Sonrd of Supervisors :his t'P,• of decision should be made at the local level; (e) suggested that all funds !•rived fro,: this venture (approximately 425,000 per year) be enrmarkcd for the I o,rGVav problem.: If) need to insure an adequate level of service M r '.,arserman stated that the Alta Loma Advisory Sabcom ittee had discussed the ,r,•blom and made a recomendation that we leave the refuse sarvlce as is and not r tm hlse III, Inllwlng addressed the Council: Id.u. Sllncv, Rancho Disposal. •hir„n Romero. Alta Loma Advisory Committee. I r.d .•nttic. Rancho Disposal. .I,k Avoklan. Yukon Disposal r n.ls Best, Best Disposal 'Intion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Pnlombo to recommend approval of franchts- tnn; of residential refuse operators at a rate of five percent out of gross r. -eipts Insrruet staff and city attorney to evaluate the proposed agree - vnt and scheduler the proposed ordinance for a public hearing on October 17 uW Instruct staff to study refuse collection rates In San Bernardino Count) end rnbmlt a rocomandation to Council Motion carried by following vote: %YtS: MLkels, Palumbo, Bridge NOES: Schlosser. Frost ;•t, Office of Traffic Snf ty Grant Report was presented by city engineer } I LtvJ Ihtbbs 'totlon: Moved by 41kets. seconded by Pnlombo to approve the concept cf the iP ;rant progrnn and rnn(Irn Its support to continue the program upon teminatlon oI flu• 0rint Motion carried by folim•Inx vote: AYES: Schlosser, Hlkele, Palumbo Bridge, ind Frost NOES: None. is CI tv Coun.11 Minutes September 19, 1979 Pc,. 12 60. Award of hid Is famnnter 5ervi,ou St of report his Fln.m„• Direct er flarry tspev Quotes had been rteetwd to expnnd .rod vt,dite the computer morvlecm .mad Is, alma Flnno•e Departm,•nt rbls had been a bu.l¢..ted Item Quotos were received , rum three umpanlem .14 (111"$: Xcrom Corp 515.1,3h amorally Munl,ipal Data Systems 525.054 " Jonn Wciks 6 Assoc $48.000`4 " *bid also included a package for planning. Y,otLon: Hovel by Mlkels, seconded by Palombc to award the bid to the Xerox Corporation for computer services for $15,636 annually Motion carried by following AYES: Schlosser, Hlkels, Paloneo. Bridge, Frost. NOES: None 6E, Award of bid for city vehicles Staff leper, by Marry Fmpey. FLnanme Director Item wa a budgeted Item. Bids had been received from seven companies for four automobiles Companies were: Arena Ford, Citrus Motors, Royce Barnett fontLac, Rwaro BuLck, Chadbourne C1•evro Let, Mark Christopher Chevrolet, Graydon Murphy Oldsmobile Arena Ford was lowest bidder of four i -door Fai rmonts at 523,5`49 53 lotion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palumbo to award bid to Arena Ford for four automobiles at $23,559 53. Motion carried by following: AYES: Schlosser, likels, Palumbo. Bridge, and Frost NOV: None 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS The City Attorney teminded Council ;he time was galclly passing, and the issue of whether the elty clerk and city treasurer were to be appointed or elected needed to be made Discussion followed she City Attorney said he would go ahead nod cratt up the necessary papers needed to put the Issue on the ballot to have these pusLticnet appointed, then staff and council could dec Wed B. NEW BUSINESS a Schlemmer made the comment that the article Ic c �eaert newspaper regarding the new city hall was preoature since Council had not made y decisions b Mayor made the following comrients regarding the recent f.te In Etiwanda: - Letters of commendation should be sent to Sgt O'Rourke and Chief Lee for the excellent fob in coord.nating the efforts of the different agencies involved - Acknowledgements of service should be sect to adjoining agencies such as the ftre departments of Ontario and Upland - Emergency contact list should Include school superintendents in use a mchoul might he needed aq an evacuation center - 'iced for better •11anster awareness, Pe 42pS soma specta. Council meeting in oarly November to apprise Cou•ctl of ,.00nty and State organ rations which would be Involved Jucing disasters - Ilavv ntaft look Into voce alternatives In roofing materials, which would not he . flammable Esperlally for the high fire areas - Re9ae4t mtaft to make recommendations to prtven' this type of fire In the future Special attention to the wind -uw and weed abatnm,tnt problems on private property L L L C,tv Council Minutes S.•Ptember 19, 1979 pigo I1 9. ADJOUR.521/YT motlnn: Howd by Pal,aibo, seconded by Sehlo,aor to adjourn thu meeting Iletlnn carried 5 -0 The meeting adjourned at 12:55 a m Rvnpectlally submltt�d, Beverly 7utchelet Deputy Ctty Clerk Aurgurt 16, 1979 CITY OF P.C,CIIO CUCAMONGA JOIN, CITY COUNCIi ,CID ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES .t III mrnod_ Myth PA I 1. CALL TO OYnER The adjourned Joint meetlre of the City Council and Advisory Committee vas held in the Lihrary Conference Roam at 9191 Baseline Road on Thursday, August 16, 1979. The 4ctinc .as called to order at 6:65 p m. by Mayor James C Frost and Chairman John Vlasic Councilmen present: Mikels, Bridge, Polombo, and Mayor Frost ,Absent: Schlosser Advisory Committee Members present: John Vlasic, Hike Zinkin, Sharon Romero, Dennis Stout, Heler Blanchard.Olenn Rankin, Evan McCall, Fave Stamper. T Harrcll Allen. Nary Bartnv, Dor. Baer, and Mary Lane Absent: Chuck Buquet, Jim Mendez, and Joe White Also present: City Manager Lauren Wasserman, Assistant City Manager Jim Robinson, City En6incer Lloyd Hubbs, Community Development Director Jack Lam, Community Services Director Bill Holley, and Dan Hendrycks item Planntng. t 2. PURPOSE OF MEETING 1 A joint meeting was held with the Council and Advisory Committee to discuss the role Iand potential areas of involvement for the Rancho Cucamonga Advisor, Committee miyor Frost clarified the role of the Advisory Coerritteca as being cn advisory body to the Courctl and Planning Commission for both short and long range activities Mawr Fras• also stated that it is the responsibility of the Advisory Cormnittees to %,•,und guess many of the residents that are unable to actively participate in Council and Advisory Committee meting,; Don B.uur stated that, in add tion, the Advisory Cotsslttces serve a: a sounding board :nr the co.- nunity as various issues cone up Mlchuel Zinkin stated that he felt the Advisory Committees needed torn lead time to oonvtdrr i•e`e; brought to ti, •^eeting for their consideration. In this way, the Wvisory t ,=ittees could better evaluate each item .Mayor Frost stated he shares concerns of Advisory Committee members of crisis presentations, but added that many issues have come up that quickly. Mr Wasscr,an stntcd staff has not felt comfortable about having to press for review of Issues so quickly because it may come back to haunt us all eventually Clmtrnan John Vlasic stated it may be appropriate at this time to identlty issues that - •ed to be studied and that the Advisory Committers will eventually become L invotv.W :h ,teen Rucero stated that Advinury Coteaittecs need to study absenteeism of members nt the Advisnry Committee and clarify attendance policy. timtr^in John Vlasl. stated that a list of gonla and priortti.s should he prepared 0'velop-rntnl Goals: I Attendance policy (alternatives) F.Pdhack and coivmuni, hart (ntnutes of other reetings disseminated to Adviso:v Curmlttees vlti icttan taken) loaned /Planing Commission, etc. City Council Minutes August lb, 1979 • rig, rv„ 1 rvnuru (legal +trurturu) Orr moles (a Lnuteal S tatabllshing community identity for Etiwnnda (Study ways tit making Etivanda col. more like a part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga) Mr. Wasserman stated that August 29 at 7:00 p m at the Catnellan School a pre- sentation would be made by the Lyon Company regarding the Lyon Project in Etivanda. In addition, he suggested that consideration be given to having a "Community Meeting" regarding the Lyon Projec• in Etivanda 1. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Mlkels, seconded by Bridge to adjourn the meeting to 7:00 p m. on August 29 for the William Lyon Company a presentation at Carnellan Elementary School Motion unani:ously carried. 'rim meting adjourned at 8t15 p m. R //espectfull ubmltted, �.(� Robinson ' Gam_ ( sistant City Manager • L September 8, 1979 CITI OF RANCHO CUChVOVGA JOIVT rrry COUNCILIPI- VVttlr. MKMISSIOV 4! %I.TES Ad , rm-d Mert[n r t. _ CALL 10 O_DER IThe adjourned Joint meeting of the City Council and the Planriag Commission convened It the Cocamonga County .rater District office at 9661 san Bernardino Road at 8:45 a m. on Srturdav, September 8, 1979 Council members present: Mtkels and Frost Absent: 7alo=bo, Schlosser, and Bridge l Planning Commisslnncra present: Remocl and Iola toy Absent: Dahl, Jones, and Garcia Also present: Assistant City Manager Jim Robinson, Community Services Director Bill Holley, Finance Director Harry Empey, City Engineer Llovd Hubbs, Community Development Director Jack [am, and Scalar Plainer Barry Hogan 2. PURPOSE OF MEETTVG Since there was not a quorum of the Council or PlenninR Commission, no official action was taken by either the Council or Planning Commission Staff, Council, and Planning Commission were briefed at the Water District offices regarding the Cucamonga County Water Dlatrict's system and then they took a tour of the water facilities in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The tcur ended and the meeting adjourned at 1 10 p o. Respectfu y submitted, 5 a--- Jim Robinson Assistant City Manager i I • September 19, 1979 CITY OF RAw:UO CUCAMUNCA CM COUNCIL MI`NTfS Regular sleeting r 1. (.ALL To ORDER IThe regular meeting of the City Council was 'old in the multi- purpose room at Carnelian Elementary Schonl, 7105 Carneltan Street, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday. Septenber 19, 1979 The meting was called to order at 7:08 p m. by Mayor James C Frost who led In the pledge of allegiance to the flag. Present: Councilmn Schlosser, Mikols, Palombo, Bridge and Mayor Frost Also present were: City Manager Lauren Wasserman, City Attorney Sam Crove, Assistant City Manager Jim Robinson, Community Development Director Jack Lem, City Engineer Llovd Ilubbs, Finance Director harry Empey, Community Services Director Bill Holley Approval of Minutes or August 29, 1979 and September 5, 1979 Motion: Moved by 'Iikels, seconded by Pelombo to approve both sets of minutes Motion carried 5 -0. . 2__ ANNOUNCEMENTS. 1 Mr Holley announced that the Comunity So "Ices Building should be completed by November 14 There had been delays in shirment of r-aterials which accounted fot the extra cl^ 2 A special meeting of the Planning Cor_rlssion at 7:00 p m. on Thursday. September 20 at the Neighborhood Community Facility at Arco and Archibald I 1 Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday. September 20 at 6:70 p.m. in the tLibrary Co,.ference Room 4 The William Lvn c,mpany will be makiR, n presentation on their special project for Stiwanda on October at 7:00 p m. to be held at the Middle School in Etivar_a 5 Mlkels announced he will be atrnnding the SCAG Cenerat Assembly •taetlnh on O, tub: r ` . 6 `taw,- announced he and a -voral staff msebers had attended a League of California L,t1os'a�!ar energy workshop on Friday, September 14 4r isserman re9Ve,ted Item 4 -c be remved .ram the Consent Calendar since i hid men approved at the prev,,,,s meeting 1._ COlH IT EE REPORTS a A,ivitory Cow ittee - none h pint Aril Coa®Ission Me Gorczvca reported the Commission was working on a ont,n ouv inventory of hivtorical sites in the area On October 9 they would be e "n., ;rire to historical landmark duslgrition for the Alta loma railroad station. LOlSi%T. CALF%DAR °Ikel rcnue +ted it.-mg "d" ,nd '.' he removed for further discussion City CuunctL Minutes September 19. 1979 Page 2 APyroval of warrants In the Amount of $197,895.97 • Register No. 79 -9 -19. h Lrim ngalnst 'he City In the arnt n( 53n,pOn hv__Knrnh Icaniv Petrey he forwarded to City Attorney for handling (•.•nl ion to ae•k nntrs ud nurcimsc ,me (1) truck - Approved in 1979 -80 Budget. g Approval of Agreement with Rancho Cucawngn 1'haaoer of Commerce - Regncat for approval of tha transfer of funds to the city for the industrial Specific Plan and authorize Mayor to sign agreerents. h Approval of Agraement with Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Request approval and at,thorize Mayor to sign agreement to transfer funds in the amount of $43,000 for the purpose of the preparation of a Fiscal Impact Model t Set dctober 3. 1979, for public hearing for Zone Change 60NF CHANGE NO. 79-08 - MERIDIAN - A Change of zone from A -1 (limited Agriculture) to M -2 (Heavy Induarrini) for 38 56 n.res of land located on the north side of Arrow, 1,300' east of I -15. • Re tiest Approval and authorize !Lly r to sirn annual rcnewnl of Cooperation Agreement for Community Development Block Grant Funds it Acceptance of Parcel Hop 5194 - The Parcel Map was tertatively approved by the City Engineer on July 16, 1979 The land division Is located on the south side of Ninth S�reet west of Hellman Avenue consists of 6 2 acres and 8 lots The condition of approval required the development of a new street tamed "Flower" The developer, Howard Hucks, has submitted bonds for security as follows: Performance Bond (Road) $17,000 Labor 6 tutorial (Road) $17.000 RESOLUTION N0. 79 -76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF M.YCHO CL'CA!IOSGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5194 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP Nn 5194) 1 Release of Bond for Cr•ntY Minor Subdivision 777 -0703 (Northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street) It 1s recommended that the City Count 11 direct the City Clerk to notify the Bank of America to releass the $26,000 letter of credit in favor of Douglas Hone, Kathleen Hone and Dougla- Gorgen. a. Release of Band for Chun[ Hinor Subdivision 77_0559 (Southeast earner of 44se Line and Arrhl6ald) It Is recn ,—ended the the Lity Council dlrert the Ct,r Clerk to notify Bank of Ame Ir, to rel,mse the act i ,de letter o` L $8.200 In the name c, Douel is Ilum duo to rite repla.er¢•nt M hoods from Ptversift, t IA VV Vt rort City Council Mtnute♦ September 19. 1979 ['are 1 r_, L J I Rcaulutlnn •t D.tent_t•1 Vl,nte I Portion .f Bmvin Stn•rt - fove[ 9164 It t a rrvuom.•nda•J tl•.It the Cit t.uncll ,pprmw the Rcaulutlnn •,f Intertl,•n In vng ur nmynn Street and •.a•t th, pnhlly hvnrtng cur U, t••. er 1, 1' In (� RESOLUTION %0 79 -75 IA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TILE t ITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA. C)ONTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE of CALIFORNIA, DECLARING tr; INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF BANYAN C STREEf AS S1101,14 ON MAP NO V -001 FILE IN THE OFFICE Or THE CITY CLERK Motion: Moved by P410cho, seconded by Schlosser to approve the Consent Calendar Motion tarried 5 -0 Item "d" -- Hlkelu questioned section p on the agreement with Sedvay /Cooko for the completion of the general plan. Mt Lam explained the eonruitants worker, for and sent all information to the city staff who In turn dlatributad and re- leased the information. She consultant could not given any information out to anyone except the City Total cost would be $112,000 Motion: Moved by Hikels, soco.nded by Schlosser to approve the contract with Sedvay /Cooke for the completion of the General Plan and preparation of the EIR and to authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement Motion carried 5-0 IItem "f" — After discussion, Council coneurret the approval of the contract Il with MKCK for s fiscal impact model should be continued to the October 3 mcuting with changes In the contract to include that the consultant would be working with the Council along with the cit7 staff Hr Lam suggested using the term "City" instead of city statf `lotion: Moved by Mikels, seccnded by Palumbo to continue Item to the October 3 meting. Motion carrie•l 5 -0 Mr Wasserman encouraged Council to contact city staff with any questions and suggestlona before the next ru:ettng 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS ,5A. Zone Change No. 79 -06 by Westwty Invrstmnts A request to change the zoning from H -R to H -1 for property lowotd on the south side of 8th Street between Hellman and Archibald Avenuen. Crdinance No 83 betire Couutil for serond re,ling Jack Lam presented the atoff report He cop stood the Item had been held over from the AugLSt let meeting because the applicant had needed more title to recordthe covenant• conditions and restrictions This had now been accomplished. L 4ayor opened the meeting for public hear.ng There being no co came nts, the public hearing was closed `1•.t i.•i Moved by Paln•abo seconded b/ Bridge to approve Or.11rance No. 83 and w.tl .tire rend(,, Motto, carried by the follov!ng vote AYES: Schlosser, "Ihcl+ Pa,onbu Brldgr, Front NOE.t: None ABSENT None Title and numhrr to.td h. .:ar <rrnan Cite Council Minutes September l9, 1979 Page • ORDINANCE NO 81 (nernnd reading) AN ORDIINAGE OF TIIF CITY (ouNrJL OF Tilt CITY nF RANCHO CUQ %40.%GA, CAIIFORNIA, REZOa LNG ASStSSUR'S PANCEL NUHOrRS ]09- 171 -07 AND :09- 17t -:0 FROM N -R TO 4 -1 FOR 18 75 ACRCS IAk..STED ON THE SOUTH SICC OF 8TH STREET BETWEEN H1,LLtLkN AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE 5R. Ordinance Nn. 70 -0 before Council for second rending An amendment to the original historic preservation ordinance to include designation of points of histnrical interest Mr. Holley presented the staff report Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Thera being no comments, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Hlkels, seconded by Palamho to approve Ordinance No. 70 -E and waive entire reading. Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palorbo. Bridge, Frost NOES: None ABSS17T: None Title and number read by Wasserman. ORDINANCE NO 70-8 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CAI.IFORNIA AMINDI.NT; ORDINANCE NO 70 CREATING AN HISTORICAL. PRESERVArtax COMIISSLON TO ACT IN Ali ADVISGRY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL OBJECTS, EVENTS, STRUCTURES AND SITES AND TO TDE\TIFY PERSONS OF HISTORICAL SIGNrriwCE TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 5C. Ordinance Nu. 85 before Council toe second reAdlnx An ordinanci, declaring certain acts to be unlawful within p,.blie parks in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Staff report by 0111 Holley M.TVOr opened the meeting !or public hearing. There being no comments, the hearing was closed 4otloa: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No 85 and waive entire reading Hn.lon carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, 4'kels, Palombo, Bridge, Frost. NOES: None ABSM: None Title and ,,umber r, ad by Wasserman ORDINANCE NO. 85 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DECLARING CERTAIN ACTS TO BE UN- LAWFUL WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CITY -OUNED OR -OPERATED PARKS I JR OTHER P.ECPVATION FACILITIES AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR I` THE VIOLATION TRFREOF. 5D. 1r,,lnince %n. 86 before Council for first rending. An ordinance establish- , „ residential growth management pion and Revolution No 79 -74 ..hick L .•�tah',ahcs a r091E.9tta: asse9Pfd'nt rating system flavor stated ther wn„Id not he m first reading this evening Council would ii-,ten to Input anu then core hack for first reading later 4r in amJe the Matt pn•aentattun outlining the growth m nagemenr P -an and t'•e hIDgvr which had been made in the ordinance City staff had met with ,evertl grumps durtng the week and Mr Lan also presented a _Ist of issues and Ot:rnatl•h n to the Council vhirh had come out of these nvetimgs • rlty aentil minutes September 19, 1979 Page 5 4vetina vas opened to Cmmcll to Ask still gwstlnns Then- were none '.Aver ailed n re,es9 at 8:15 p in Ilia netting rr.nnvened at 8:1n p m, with all rmnAer9 u: tho Council And staff present r `Livor opened the meeting for public henring Ilit—min Rempel, Chnt:aan ^c the Planning Commtwstnn made some introductory coalam-nits giving some background t the growth estrangement plan C Tony (over, President of the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, requested Council to table the item for at least two weeks to allow the Chamber time to lock at the amendments and problems Leonard Corczyca, Chat rtbn of the Historical Commission, elated that In section Pro the word "historical" should be added. Ken Willis, BIA, also requested it Council table the item at least two weeks in order for them to look at the recommendations mde by the staff Bob Young. representing the Ontario -Chino Board of Realtors, requested a con- tinuance in order to work with th Chamber of Co=erce In evaluating the recommenda- tions Council considered whether to hear public input on thi Resolution at this time It was decided to proceed, and Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing on the resolution Sharon Romero, member of the Alta Lom Advisory Committee, suggested a warancee system be include ' Ken Willis stated they also were concerned in the area of varantees and that this was also of national concern. There was a national insurance program available and the local group has been invited to join He stated that locally the Levis Horns nod the best varanteo program and ashad Mt Ralph Levis to explain his program. 9r Levis suggeatet that warantees not be a part of the point ayatrm. Ile pointed out that the ROW ((erne Owners Warant.e) program was very expensive for the builder He said his organisation tried to stand behind their products for a reasonable length of time mectit,g was closed for public hearing matter: Moved by r, seconded by Palombo to continue the public hearing to the October J mcecta„ a Ordinance No. 86 and Resolution No 79 -74 Council deliberated whether to give the nrdinence first reading and wait on the resolution This would give them additional time to work on the problems before the enabling ordinance vent into ecfect Mikels suggested that Council should give sores input to staff so the revisions in the ordinance and resolutior would reflect the utahes of the Council Palo -bo withdraw lit& second on the original motion Call was made for another second Mayer Frost seconded the motion The motion to continue the public hearing L co the Oetobtr J meet ng on the Ordinance and Resolution was approved by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Pal =be. Bridge, Frost NOES: Mikels (he lilt Inv ordinance could pass the first reading with some discussion ) 411,019 suggested lore radlfications In sections B -2 and 8 -9 of the Resolution. Section B -2 should r worded. "to help insure adequare school facilities are provided " Section 8 -9 "to encourage " should Le added 'tot Lon: 'wed by Hlkels, seconded by Palombo to approve the above changes in Cc, Ilona a -2 And 9-9 Notion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, PAlonbo. Bridge, And Frost. :NOES: None ABSENT: None City Council Minutes Septerber 19, 1979 P u:o h • 4'kel" questioned the order of 6 -8 and h -L Ho jolt the order should be rvvorscd He addressed the gncetlon of whether it cormitmeut to an nsseosinent di.trlct was reversabiv to the rlty attornov The .Ity attorney said env commltr,nt would be ..nd,tlonal Since all t'.reo ],.ad to he art anyway, 41kvls did not pursue tl,e Issue Hikels gncsttioned the wording in Section 7 -A. Mayor suggested the section be revor, .d Hikels expressed concern that a project of lower points could preempt a project with higher points simply because of the position of having been delayed from another period Motion: Moved by Hikels to have staff revise language in entire section 7 -A and bring back to Council Hikels questioned Jack lam if the Staff had anhausted all alternatives in the issue Hr. Lae pointed out there was another alternative to have all applications, even those coming from a prior period, be treated equally within that period It would be by total competition within each period Palumbo suggested that Council eft onwn In a work session co work out these issues Hikels said Council should give staff some direction on the ordinance now • Bridge expressed that they should go with a total competition plan. Council concurred to have staff come back with alternatives for the underlined sections Hikels withdrew his motion. Mayor then vent over the issues and alternative list which had been presented earlier by Hr lam Council concurred with the mayor's cooe:ents which were: Issue 1 — Council had agreed this section 7 -A needed to be reworked. Issue 2 — Council had diucussed this earlier Issue 1 through issue 11 — Council concurred With staff's recocmendatlon (See memorandum dated Feptember 19 to City Council; subject: Issues and Alternatives to the Growth Management Plan) Hayor called a recess at 10:20 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 10:35 p m. with all Council and ettff members present 7. STAFF REPORTS. 7A. Zoning Dctemtnntlon to Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association. A request for zoning determination as to whether or not the Popoff Association use is 4Llwable in the R -1 zone Item continued from the September 5 meeting. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, presented the staff report He pointed out the • issue was to determine whether the project was to be considered as a "church" which would be compatible with the R -1 zoning or ascommercfal venture! The Planning Cocaisslon had determined by a split vote that the use would be similar to a church The concern was that perhaps this use was a commercial activity Which had a enurch and was not appropriate for that area Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo that the Peter Popoff Evangeltseic Association was characteristic of a church activity and consistent with the R -t zone City Council Minorca September 19, 1979 Page 7 n „w:t,a tiro[[, a Claremmit tit to racy represent Lng the Popoff Found at Inn, sldre,i4vd the Co•mrll Mellon: The orlNlunl mutlrnl that this was charnrtcrlstic of n Jutrch a,tivlty utd .nnnlat,•nt with the R -1 one was defeated by the fallowing vote: AYES: Rrldge, Palombo NOES: Schlosser. Mikels, Frost ABSF_9T: None >Iat Ion: Moved by Mikels. seconded by Schlosser to table the Item and to , onnlder at the October T meeting. Motion carried by the following vote: a,ES: Schlosser. Mikels, Frost %DES: Bridge. Pa Limbo Mr Scott asked this to be changed to the October 17 meeting since he would be out of town October 1. 'lotion: Moved by :ilkela, seconded by Schlosser to change the date that the Item would return to Council to October 17 Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Frost NOES: Palombo, Bridge OR. Proposal for on ordinance nraviding for the control, collection, and disposal of refuse Question before Council was should the C1 y of Rancho Cucamonga franchise refuse operators. Harry Empey presented the staff report Mr. Wassertan made sour additional comments on the theory of open competition. He also pointed out that: (a) rates were determined Ly the County, therefore, all companies have the same rates( (b) city would have authority to help solve complaints: (c) soma neighborhoods have different companies serving them a day apart. (d) rate Increases are determined by the Baird of Supervisors. This type of decision should be made at the .ocal level; (e) suggested that all funds derived from this venture (approxlmmtely $25.060 per year) be earmarked for the parkway problems; (f) need to insure an adequate level of service. 4r Wasserman stated that the Alta Lama Advisory Subcommittee had discussed the problem and made a rocommendation that we leave the refuse service as is and not franchise The following addressed the Council: Adam Sllncy, Rancho Disposal. Sharon Romero. Alta Loma Advisory Committee Fred Gentile, Rancho Disposal. lack Avakian. Yukon Disposal Francis Best, Best Disposal :lotion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to recommend approval of franchin- Ing of residential refuse operators at a rate of five percent out of gross receipts Instruct staff and city attorney to evaluate the proposed agree- ment and schedule the proposed ordinance for a public hearing on October 17 and instruct staff to study refuse collection rates in San Bernardino County and submit a recommendation to Council Motion carried by following vote: AYES: 4Lkels, Palombo, Bridge. NOES: Schlosser, Frost. 6C. Office of Traffic Safety Grant. Report vas presented by city engineer Lloyd Robbs L Notion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palumbo to approve the concept of the grant program and confirm its support to continue the program upon termination of the grant Motion carried by following vote: AYES: Schlosrer, Mikels, Palo�bn. Bridge, and Frost NOES: None 9 I Itv I nun, 11 41nutea S,Pt.•nber 19. 1979 • P V c- Cn. Award .,I hid for to *ruler lervi,pn St of report by Finin.e Director Harry Frre, Onetes bad been naeiv,•d to expand rind ipdity the computer services used h• tie Finm.a IA partm•nt This bad been a hudgated Item ouotes wre received tr,en three •..panien .as Ioll,ws: \en., Iorp SIS,h36 amumlly 4unl.lp4l Data Systems $25,054 John Willis 6 Aaaoc $48,000• " *bid also Included a package for planning. Motion: 4nved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to award the bid to the Xerox Corporation for computer services for $15.636 annually Notion carried by following: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, Frost NOES: None 6E. Award of bid for city vehicles Staff report by Harry Enpey, Finance Director Item was a budgeted item. Bids had been recv'ved from seven companies for four automobiles Companies were: Arena Ford, Citn s Motors, Royce Barnett Pontiac, Romero Buick, Chadbourne Chevrolet, Mark Christopher Chevrolet, Graydon Murphy Oldsmobile Arena Ford was lowest bidder of four 4 -deor Fairmcnts at • $23,559 57 Motion: :loved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to award told to Arena Ford for four automobiles at 523,559.53. Motion carried by following: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost NOES: None 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. The City Attorney reminded Council the time was o• cl.ly passing, and the issue of whether the city clerk and city treasurer were to be appointed or elected needed to be made Discussion followed The Clty Attorney said he would go ahead and draft up the necessary papers needed to out the issue on the ballot to have these positions appointed, then staff and council could decided 9. NEW P.USINESS. I Schlosser made the co©ert that the article in a recent newspaper regarding .he new city hall was premature since Council had rot made any decislons. b Mayor mado the following comments regarding the recent fire in Etiwanda: • - ie -tters of commendation should be sent to Sgt. O'Rourke and Chief Ice for the excellent job in coordinating the efforts of the different agencies involved - Acknnvledgemonts of service should be sent to adjoining agencies such as the fire departments of Ontario and Upland - tmergency contact list should include school superintendents in case a school might be needed as an evacuation center L :ced for botc,•r disaar,r awareness Perhaps some special Council meeting in enriv November to apprise Council of County and State organizations which would be involved during disasters - Have staff look into some alternatives in roofing materials which would not be ,, flammable Especially for the high fire areas - Request staff to oat•- recommendations to prevent this type of fire in the future Special attention to the windrow and teed abatement problems on private property I f • 11 City Council Minutes septrmbcr 19, 1979 Page 9 q._ AUJIR)R�' (M Notion: Nov.d by Pulombo, srcunded by Scblo%scr to nJJn,,rn thu meeting Noti.n .trrlcd $ - -I The mertln6 odjonrned at 12:55 n m. Ruspectfully submitted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk