HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/10/17 - Agenda Packet7' /of -A
,il A G E N D A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONGA
Regular H^eting
Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpose Room
7105 Carnelian
October 17, 1979
AGE':DA IT; "S -- NOTE: All Items submitted for the Ciro- count: agenda
v:s- -, in .r r. tinq The deadline for submittlnq items i.i 5:00 p.m. on
::ic - `I,rSda "-lot to the first and third Hednosdoy of each math The
o .orA'j o.'fice recuives all such lamas
1 CALL TO ORDER.
A DLE7GE TO FLAG
,ff 7 ROLL CALL Il,kels Palombo A , Schlosser X , Bridge > , Frost_.
. ,)FROPAL OF NIIIUTES Ocetot ber SA 9k
2 ' °.OUSrEr1a9TS
a Council
b Staff
D CO -117CE REPORTS
a Advisory Cn,nittee
b Historical Conalssion
1 .0 "S71' CALEWIAR.
rho, rnllueinq Consent C. ^nlar stems are orxctd to be routLe ,mi
,vn mtruversial They wt.I a actod upon by tho Council at omr
'l'V n'hout dLcvssion Any Cnunil .Camber, staff member, ur
ntvr.:sted pa -ty mty rorywsL chit an item be removed from the
'uns,•nt Cal •nlac •cr later discussion.
a Approval of Narrancs; Register No 79- 10 -17; for 5581,125 115 7
b. Approval of Alcoholic 3everage License for Hahnaz b
Nanoochehr Sadeghian, Rocky's New York Style Pizzeria;
on sale beer and wine eating place; new license 2
location: 9615 Foothill Blvd ---
City Council Agenda -2- October
17, 1979
4 Cnnsont Calendar (continued)
c .Approval of Alcoholic Beverage L tense foi Circle K
:orporation, 12854 Foothill Blvd; change in names,
dropping partner
3
d Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License for Roy Sanam,
Red hill Liquor tt.hange in name)
4
e Approval of Alcoholic Beverage License fur Alpha Beta
Company, 6753 Carnelian; new license
5
f Approval of consultant's agreement for vngineeriro design
and construction staking services in cur -inctlon .ith the
street improvements for the "North Tv.., area, to be
funded through HUD Block Grant funs Authorize mayor
and city clerk to execute agreement
5
g Tract 9436 Accept agreement and securities from
Chevron Land and Development Co ; location east of Haven
at Victoria, consists of 27 tats
19
Performance bond (road) $106,000
tabor d material (road) $106,000
RESOLUTION NO 79 -82
21
A RESCLUT104 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE.
MENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL
.NAP OF TRACT NO 9436
., rr,ct 9437 Accept agreement and securities from
:nev,on Land and Development Co ; location: east of Haven
22
at lietoria; consists of 29 lots
Pertormance bond (road) $124,000
Labor L Material (road) $124,000
RESOLUTION NO 79 -84
24
A RESULU71ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOR111A, APPROVING IMPROVE -
MENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL
MAD OF TRACT NO. 943'
1 Tract 9444: Accept agreement and securities from
Rancho Oe Cucamonga (Mark III Homes, Inc ); location
25
nle corner of Banyan and Amethyst; consists of 20 lots.
Performance letter of credit (road) 576,000
Labor d Material letter of credit (road) $76,000
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -83
27
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RAYCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVE -
KENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL
MAP OF TRACT NO. 9444.
City Council Agenda -3- October 17, 1979
4 CONSENT CALENDAR (continued)
j Parcel Map 4805 Approval of Parcel Map 4805, authorize
City Clerk and City Engineer to sign map and forward for
recordation Location: south side of Church between Ramona
and Archibald 28
RESOLUTION NO 79 -85 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 4805, (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO 4805)
k Release of the folloding bonds
Minor Subdivision W76 -0198 - Release of Storm Drain Channel
Letter of Credit Located on the west side of Amethyst at
Valley View. Owner: Harold E Miller
Letter of Credit (storn drain channel) $11,600 31
Tract 9288. Accent re1Js and release bond to Manfred Hall.
Located an south side of Vicara Drive between Sapphire and
Jasper
:c•fornunce bond (road) $34,000 31
tract 9634: Accept roads and release bond to Chavanne
Real'—YTTne Located on south side of Banyan between
Beryl and Hellman
Performance bond (road) $70,000 31
5 PUBLIC HEARINGS.
A Ordinance No. 88 for second r ailing stablishing a n gativ
'l,rlarltlnn and ?on p rhan�p fnr iR SA nrrps of ]Ann loratpd
on tbo nnrth s,dp of Arrow aonrnsimatply 110n fppt pAst nf
Intautate -IS. Zone Change Request NO 79 -08 from A -1 (limited
agriculture) to M -2 (heavy industrial) by Meridian Construction
ORDINANCE NO. 88 (second reading) 35
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL 14UPIBER 229- 021 -59 FROM A -1 TO M -2 FOR
38.56 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW,
1300 FEET EAST OF INTERSTATE 15
City Council Agenda -4-
5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
B Ordinance No. 87 for second readin establishin a Rancho
Cucamonqa Advisory Come ss on. ReDOrt by Jim Robinson
October 17, 1979
An ordinance which establishes a Ranlhb Cucammga Advisory
Commission which includes a statement on the general role
of the Advisory Commission, composition of membership, terms
/, of appointment, removal of members, meetings, officers, and
h minute taking
ORDINANCE NO. 87 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVISORY
COMMISSION TO 4CT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
C An ordinance extendin the moratorium ex iratfon date on
n P.eDort y Jac Lam.
On August 15, 1979, the City Council approved an extension
of Ordinance No 64 to November 8, 1979 However, In light
of recent developments and the progress of the Growth
Management Plan, it is necessary to consider an extension
to the moratorium
/ 36
v 37
ORDINANCE NO 64 -C (urgency) 40
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE
h MORATORIUM IMPOSED BY ORDINANCE NO 64 AND OE-
"LARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
C An ordinance establishing a Design Review Committee and criteria
or architectural rev ew or eve of pment within the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Report by JacK Lam
The ordinaK.e creates a Design Review Committee consisting of two
Planning Commission members and the Director of Community
Development or his designee The committee will meet twice monthly
or more often if needed The time and place for the meetings will
be established by a Resolution of the Planning Commission
I
The ordinance also sets forth criteria which the committee will
U, in reviewing the design of a project
Recommendation On September 26, 1979 the Planning Commission held
a public hearing to consider public testimony on the proposed
ordinance Upon completion of the public hearing and review by
r the Planning Commission, it is recommended that the City Council
+ adopt Ordinance No 89 and the issuance of a Negative Declaration 41
City Council Agenda -5- October
17, 1979
•
5 PUBLIC HEAR1106 (continued)
ORDINANCE 40. 89 (first reading)
45
AN ORD iANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMGNGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A DESIGN
REVIEW PROCEDURE WHICH ESTABLISHES A DESIGN REVIEW
MMITTEE AND DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA
E An ordinance establishing regulations pertaining to the ID ayino
o• Bingo in the City of Rancho Cucamonoa. Report by Harry Empey
Bingo has been declared legal in the State of California, and
the Slate aces set forth basic requirements for conducting bingo
'James This ordinance establishes regulations for bingo games
to help prevent illegal gomes from taking place in the city
50
ORDINANCE NO 90 (first reading)
51
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ELIGIBILITY OF AND REGULATIMS PERTAINING TO
THE PLAYING OF BINGO WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
. CUCAMONGA.
b CITY 'MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
A. 7ont_ng ordinance determination No. 79 -04 - Peter Popuff
E v_ange i— Tstic Association Sta f report by Jack Lam.
Council had continued the request from the September 19
meeting in order to have additional time to consider the
applicant's request 59
B Parkway Maintenance Program. Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs
At the September 5 City Council meeting, the Council authorized
the approval of a contract w,th Roy Jorgensen and Associates to
prepare a maintenance management study and recommend a mainten-
ance program for the maintenance and rehabilitation of the
city's parkways 78
C. Landscape Maintenance Districts Staff report by Lloyd
HubUS
® At the July 5, 1979 meeting of the City Council, Council
approved the preparation of engineering reports on the
formation of Landscape maintenance District for tracts not
yet recorded and in the various stages of construction
City Council Agenda -6- October 17, 1979
6 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS (continued)
C continued
A report by the City Engineer identifies 167,522 square feet of
Parkway to be maintained at S 40 per square foot Total
estimated assessment is $67,008.80 This cost spread over
704 lots will result in a per lot assessment of S94 19 per year
Recoomendation It Is recommended that City Council adopt
Resolution No 79 -80 approving the Engineer's Report and
Resolution No 79 -81 declaring intention to establish Landscape 79
District No 1 and setting November 7, 1979 for public hearing _
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -80 92
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 14E CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PREL,MINARY
APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSWE
MAIIITENANCL DISIRICT NUMBER 1
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -81 93
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUC,41ONGA, CALIFORNIA. DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ORDER THE FORMATION DF LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO I PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPIUG AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING
A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO.
D Request b_y Deer Creek Company for park tax credit for Tract 96
9582-1 Staff report by Jack Lam.
C Pro osed Resolution su oortin implementation of Law
En
Lauren Wass Ass stance Reform Act LEAH taf report by
Lauren Wasserman
The California Criminal Justice Planning Director's Assoc
has requested the City's support of the Law Enforcement
Assistance Reform Act. Essentially, the purpose of the new
law is to provide for greater program control at the local
level with less state and regional intervention In addition.
the law will attempt to eliminate bureaucratic details and
paperwork w:Nch normally are asooeiated with the receipt of
Law Enforcement Assistance Act funding. The Chairmen of tht
various regional planning associations have requested tnat
the City Council adopt a resolution encouraging the continued
development of regional planning districts for the administra-
tion of Law Enforcement Assistance Act programs It is re-
City Council Agenda -7- October 17, 1979
. 6 CITY MAGER'S STAFF REPORTS (continued)
E continued. .
commended at the City concur with the recoraobmla-
tion and copies be forwarded to the Chairman of the
Criminal Justice Planning Board Assoc in Riverside It
is significant to note that the Arrowhead Justice Assoc 183
has gone on -ecord in favor of the proposed Pesoli.tior,
RESOLUTION NO 79 -86 104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUIICIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFOR4141, ENCOURAGING
THE CLNTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL PLANNING
DISTRICTS
F A ointment of City Clerk and City Treasurer. Staff
report by Lauren Ilas,erman
Council may recall that during the city's incorporation
election the issue of providing for an appointed city clerk
and city treasurer was inadvertantly omitted from the
incorporation ballot. Council had indicated shortly after
• incorporation that the matter should be submitted to the
voters at the next municipal election which will be in
Adril 1980 The City Attorney has prepared the necessary
ballot proposals for consideration of the City Council
he attorney has suggested four different formats for
Prtsenting the issue to the voters It is suggested that
either alternate A or B be selected for the format on the
municipal ballot
It is significant to note that until the issue has been
resolved by the electorate, the incumbent city clerk and
city treasurer must run for the if #ice on the same ballot
in the event the voters decide lint to have the two positions
appointed. The present salary for each of the positions is
$40 00 per month although neither of the incumbent; ,is
collected any salary since appointment in early 1978
Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council authorize
the placement of the appointment of city clerk and city treasurer
as a ballot measure in connection with the municipal election of
1980 116
0
_
City Council 4re::da 8_ Octo.er 17, 1979
0
7 CIT_ ATTORNEY Y_ S REPORTS•
s qj, BUSIIIESS.
a council
b Audience
9. AOJOURRMUM
E
l'I
RP67 T171r OF
RANCHO CLCAHONGA
WAR
Ws.RR
P VEN
U V E N 0 0 R N A M E
WARR
NT NET
DATE
CO273
3407
8313
:SSI�( ROBERTA
SAN '.RND \0 CO EMPLOY C
9/25/79
9/27/79
287,47
S74
75
9376
SOLAR ENERGY ADV BO
9/27/79
991.00
70.00
76
8335
tECURITY PACIFIC BANK
9/28/79
200.000.00
00277
00278
1200
5275
BANK OF AMERICA
INTL CITY MGT ASSOC
10/01/79
10 /01/19
4.650.80
00279
7985
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT S
10/01/79
126.55
4,728.93
00280
6321
SANTA FE FED ERALLL S L L
10/02/79
100,000.00
00282
8500
104,8/2.30
STATDALOKPENSATICUAVIMG
10/04/79
0028.3
2080
CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT F
10/04/79
100.00
02535
VOID
FORMS ALIGNMENT
10/17179
02536
02537
VO0
4
FORM ALGNMENT
10/17/79
V01D
IS
FORMS ALGNMENT
10/17/79
02538
02539
0025
REITER '9VELOPMEhT A H
10/17/79
300.00
X1255
AL,ION TRA"E1 RGENCY
10 /17/79
416.00
0_540
C227
LL SEASONS POOL SERVlC
10/17/79
1.75
02541
0240
ALiA LOMA AUTO PARTS
10/17/79
39.57
0.542
02543
0525
D
ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS
fASELINE
10/17/79
87? .80
UC
HARDWARE
10/17/79
8.71
02544
02545
2350
COLEMAN DAN
IAMERA
10117/79
35.42
2360
CCLTON L INST
10/17/79
115.54
02546
02547
2400
2441
COOK /ARTHUR INC
CO OF SAN BRNAROlNO
10/17/79
121.49
02548
2450
CC SAN BERNAROINO SHERI
10/17/79
10/17/79
02'•,9
2460
ggAN PONO CO TRANS COMM
10/17/79
139 I8I.00
1:341.00
0: »0
2575
CUCAMONGA CO WATFR DIST
10/17/79
562.44
01551
2595
CUCAMONGA PRINTING
10/17/70
979.12
02552
2805
u1CTAPHONE
10/17/19
2,188.16
02553
2810
OIETRICH -POST CO
10/17/79
55.51
02554
3300
EMPEY, HARRY J
10/17/79
S1.96
02555
3303
THE EMPIRE CO
10/17/79
2,986.00
0.556
4050
FED BART
10
645.02
0:557
4600
3ENE4AL TELEPHONE CO
10/1/(7/79
7/79
19,85
>
4100
•CRDONS INC
10/17/79
440.22
0558
559
560
4835-
4870
HENORYCKa DAN
10/17/79
47.07
HCFMAN, WILLIAM I1
10/17/79
25.96
0,*561
5t10
IBM
10/17/79
1,790.97
0;562
02563
6175
JOBS AVAILABLE
10/ 7/79
66.00
6700
LINSCOTT LAMS E CREESPA
110/17/79
3,465.77
77!64
6850
L A TINEpS - E E SMITH
10/17/79
10.00
C2565
7LU0
'PAS MEPHERSHIPS
10/17/79
20.00
0'546
7140
-ARTIN C CHAPYAN CO
10/17/79
397.34
0' 67
7200
OARTINEL UNION SERVICE
10/17/79
11.80
02563
92569
7220
7250
MATCHAN KAREN C
MAWHINWY
10/17/79
21.34
02570
7303
ALLAN H
MILES FR�ODIE
10/17/79
612.00
8
10/17/79
435.00
02571
7375
MONAHAN, CLAUDIA
10/17/79
43.50
02572
7715
PAK -TEK INC
10/ 7/79
54.00
01573
7750
F MORTON PITT Cu
10/17/79
142.78
02574
01575
7917
7820
PRES'HER, MONTE
PRIG
0/17/79
30/17)79
164.00
02576
8020
COLOR PRES'
RAMIRE2 CONSEPCION
10/17179
47,37
250.00
02577
80455
RANCHO dTSPUS%L SERVICE
10/17/79
46.00
02579
8127
RICHARDS.AGARY
E0/17/79
02580
8.45
!COT SCOTT MEDICAL LAO
10/17/79
122.98
25.75
02581
830C
S C ' PLASTIC SUPPLY
10/17/79
63.60
02 83
g7 `
8368
5
'M I'MMENNETT
10/17/79
28.70
02584
02585
8370
8390
CO INC
SMITH BRUS GLASS
CUTHERN CALL°
10/37/79
10/ 7/79
57.24
69.18
02586
8395
OISON
SSCUTHERN CA�TF ,
LO /37/79
10657.11
02587
8398
SOUTHLAPIC PA4ER CO
10/17/79
76.46
02588
8502
STATS DEPT CF F,`11NLE
10/37/79 I
1,684.27
02589
02590
8525
8542
STATIONEPS C'IRP
Sl:N n
!0/17/79
10/17/79
1,352.00
02591
592
8540
UN E f: (.RSC9AN
ELEt
,0/ 7/79
7Z9.0p0
10/17/79
58
9148
VANGUARONLEASING SYSTEM
0/17/79
242.88
330.00
02595
VOID
FINAL TC TALS
30/37/79
581,125.85
REGISTER
NO. 79 -10 -17
�I a
0 ■ ■ a. w1 /w.,I .'.. eu W.. o. NO Wnle AMn r11. U.—FO Me ,.H... GM,. o.ty
ApJl1CA ION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSES)
1. TYPES) OF DCENSE(S)
HlE NO.
Depunnent of Alcohol, lls a oge Control
FEE NO.
121 S O Street
Smrmnento. Call 93314 ' -la — ^stA?_ ^.TIC
�:; ° ;f L:: �.i r 'l:i:
GEOGRAPHICAL
I.TL.G °Lw..
CODE 3613
Tf a unde,.9n,d hereb? oppbn for
Date
1, enus des,rbed or fall
Inued
Temp. Parrot
2. 71AME(S) OF APMCANT(S)
Applied order Sec 24044
--
�i1I11:Ia :.F.n; : i:nuochchE
ERecti,e Data �
ERegnre Data
S. IYPE(S) OF TRANSACTIONS
FEE tic.
TYPE
300.00
U
)2.40
A Nome of Suunns t:l 21
.00Kyl9 .xv Toer 1:vda .lizzeria
S. Loconon of Suunesf— Numbe. and Saes
)515 Foothill 31vd.
' Cry and Lp Code County ,m
.tancho r.lc- -non-3 L1) 3C m 2dn
RECEIPT No. ^' TOTAL
/ 7.
3
II Remnn Ucenfed.
7 Are Prmw Inge
0, Limits? n
rr{rp 11.1.1
7 Have you e.er boon c mr,ded of o felony? 10. Hove you "t, violated any of the provision, of the Alcoholic
Sewroge Control Act or regulation, of the Department per.
tauang to the Act?
answer to items 9 or 10 on an ottodmment wh.c11 %hall be dromed pxt of this application
17 AppiKant agree, (a; that any nonage, emplayea in on -sole hamurd preen ,w, YmR Fare a0 the "Plicatons of a 3<emee, and
_ (b) that be .dI col .okte o, cause w permit to be V WWW any o1 the p,.w, of the Alcoholic Sewall. Central Act.
1. STATE OF CADFORNIA Ceunly of MI T..R{IARDlf:v Date 10_3-7?
r,ve.. r .... gym. w Y .r . es. r w r wm..w
.4r J a. wMr1 .r.rwr. �e Y 6. Nyre yJ +.r+, Mr Wwa Y nr{ w. w4.,y, r i MII IP Y Y ,n eeM Y. Irw
ar. whJw rw ,rw M IYww M,M rw Y W ti i w V. IrYM O..r W. r. M. pl Y r ..,w .ir Y.. „ soli
r rWrw w. r1 a...r r uF.0 .wN Y Y wW. r w4Y. M.ru Y Y .rVM rss Ir .YJ w. w1Y..r. n ,, Nr
1 {I wv Y ._solo .eJ.M r /w0. AYIY w 4 W V WI) ....,w J . M Y IwY1 r .e.�1 .urM YY �. Yr'. aal
w.rlr w4Y.... We �✓. Y. C.Ir.rrl r Y pr r ..uA... a a.ASI Y r M r, a.I.I w ,wJw., V Y
M aYrr.r
14. APPLICANT ., X
SIGN HERE -'
Hr
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Don,
tl ✓wr r H wYnre 4.YH4 ew.1iA \.1.r ... Y w /.. r I. M ..K..J rw.r for_ wilrJ r ile w.. arw�1 J M w4Wr
J J
a ner/r wrrYr Y W .Y Y Yr.rr1 r Y e.r .r YW{JI
rw.� Y r M rS NfY ..Idw r Y M.rw r fi.... w ✓.!!. ..J—w1 111 Y I\. Mlr w6.Yr F Y .Wow \. Jr r
MaY.I . M eYrY rIY Y IIwM.e \JiI. Y V a11rrYI.
5 I& No -.(.) of Lken,eehl 17. Signoture(s) of Lkamee(f) Ili. llerrefe mmiN rf,)
Cr.r - v ^n
E
o. w +mrb- 4.1.1..1
Tor Ocpartment of Alcolwlic 8011119" Conhel
121505tne1 r.__ 1_ ...•.tine
Sanamenta. Cold. 95814
The undero9wd hereby oppl,es for
11nm,, d.m.bed as Follo.sr
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT($)
4.
� O. Nw Wrlte AMw Teb ❑w-L1
OFF SALE BEER & WINE
\ppRed ..der Sec 24044 ❑
7. TYPEIS) OF TRANSACTION(S)
issued
FEE
Cos. 0.11
I
A. Name of SVYnIf1
S. Laconon of Bubnns- Number and Site"
12854 Foothill Blvd.
s
C.ty and Lp Code Cow "y RECEIPT NO 35441 TOTAL
n s•n r,t D o 1 2 Ara Pwmam Inside
0. If P,e ncs Licensed. rty Ummi Yob
Sho. TYPe of Licenw 20
8. Mcmb 9 Address 01 d. cwt from 5)- Number and Strnt
P 0 Oyx 20230 Phoeni.'c AZ 85061
9. Hose you ever been con.ined of a ralany? 10 Hare You evn violated any of the proristonl of the Alcoholic
[",,age C.mml Act as regulations of the Depamwnt Per•
ta,Nng to the Act? Yoe
A co oration
I1. E.plain a "YES' 111.01 ro item. 9 or 10 on an attachment .hick 1ho11 be domed pan Of IN1 appRwdon.
IL IAbp Photahe will n (a) that or cauw afar •mltl to 6 triolotled any of the rpm•�uem will aI the Alcoholic eawa9 Centro) Act.
and
n
County of SAN BERYARDINO Dote - -
17. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
« r\.vr. .w uarb.• ....r• w... rmr...a r.. tY w Y Y ...ea... m Wn, m er r sr .r0 w w.-
Il.e.• .r.•r "`�.rie r Y wwwe r«.•°"'• u../rb.e ,. w\. K 1116•*. r .sr r Y ...ro.r
.e.r « Y ..M+•r •^•""" w « Y ,rb.w. Ym...y r. bw eI ,sa r tw.r _
r.e .,.p,..ir ri \.w�. Y s.r'. Yn.l M .w .r1, J rJw N 4. rwew.M wen Y L.wl.l Ir ..� Yr wr�Y.Y.rnl INI
r wMr'.. W r•/ l+at r Y4w+ 4+1..1114 b � r., r�Y e..w+ «. la r r IIY r. .r..r+ r•
Iq Mr Y eWr wK y. Ir...r• 4 W .N Y A,r.r.r r r Mr r ..4\aJ . r....w. r r w r a.ir « 04)41 w M
rn we!". Y K r ww M . •r 1.144' _
b
14.
_N � Ylr�� r r . Yn -• .ar
r Y ow 'jKE. 0�7.
APPLICANT
SIGN HERE Ely. y.
APPLICATION By TRANSFEROR •'`- ..c+.+ -ir ` "
Count' of �sn.•.c' Dote
=TI5. STATE OF CAUFORNIA _ .: n'-' .•"
..� W+ s..W .l .wl.rr. w rr• .rr Jer.....t+w1 w... area.. ..e rry Its Y. � �I w ti w.e• r�,\.,+.�.rw rr � ce
�.4 4 Y I...r4e \.•� �rdA eAr wn4nlW r 1. K 1..Jw a.Y,«b. r J K r.or.e.• \
e _
.:.r+. I, Y 1A ..rtw Y ..w.�J M Y Wrrn el M Y 4rlr .I.ar..r w 4414 ewJr Y � N Y 'D..r�.r
a.•.A.q M b• r ..Y\ Y w.r..Ma.a... w
COPS(V.." deMrl —e.rve dl nM.r Oe Nn WrIM1 AMq Bile H.NerYnlenrNn Olan only
PLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
lot Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
1215 O Sheet SAN BF-MBARD1110
Sacramento. Calif. 95814 —
°.. +.rc....n.e.oc. +.e..
The undersigned hereby oppfer far
Bomes described m fe!bwo
I. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S)
FILE NO
OFF SAL: GFIIR..RAJ
Applied under Sec. 24044 0
Effective Dated 185=c6
FEE NO.
GEOG
CODE ib RAPHISAl15
Date
Issued
2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S)
Tamp Pe-snit
Effective Dole, _
SAIUbIL, Roy R.
]. TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S)
IIC.
TYPE
PER. VF.
JPEI
2GE 3.00
�08mA111 LiQOOS'
S. Location of Bmmest- Number and Street
8939 PootM11 Blvd.
—
fttinenDiL&c'dOa'onga 91730 3Ai1"BT.O.
RECEIPT NO. 35516 TcITAL
5 rs
21
6 If Premise, Licensed, 7 Are Premise side 1.08
Show Type of License 21 City time
a Ma ling Addceu Of different from 5)- Number and Street 0ip1 n "w')
9. have you arm been cone,cfed of a felony? 10 Have you ever violated any of the provision, of the Alcoholic
Beverage Central Act or egulapon, of the Department par.
,A raining to the Act? c/
11. Explain a'YES' ant", to item, 9 or 10 an an attachment which ,hall be deemed part of thie appfrcaaon.
tt. Applrccnr ogres (a) root any manager .mpteyed In orotala Oeensad pemu+ wdl hone a0 the quagficatrona of a Ccomae. and
(b) sFnt he wdl riot rloloq or eouw or perMt to b violated any of the yours ens of the Aimhogc B.wmpe t'.ontrol Act.
1] STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of 81047 BSR1iAftDI11O Date 9/12!79 - —
Yid+ erns M w.Yn. rJ rr .Nr +ere eew+ M1 .04, ..e "1 111 rY 1+ rr v,v w. w r M Irw systi er r ree,Y..
ecru M M ewlb+ wMren . �e Y ... Ir.r..e w+ +e✓, d,lr wnrlW +. rM. b Yeer+Y^ en N WIr, al M Y L. ,W w Y,w
W
14 rr+r Y,.+ W MM r. W .1 W iw,riw Mm. w W w wu l)1 I Q ,r ewe M. nr M is
Yiwr YMw+ Y 4. ieili.ui r .Nlbr. weu w er tWnue war IY. a+re1N Ili wYd M. g1kWr F w,idn
Y) M M .irlr vsvv ew r ew.re .0. . r Wi w ii+Yr, ni err M • Ili r Y 1,x'1 s Wewwl r,wM Yr ere er ilrry Ihl
410+ erv+i+e Y do r r.J 1Y Yw+lr rlirir n YM .M Ib 0.N,1r Y u Y V'. r wYdGJ a 141. le w Iw 1 aeiler .e er' ✓rr w Y
hire w Y..i F wiir 4 wrilirw+ IT Iii Y e.rrr ie.aooiw r, Y ...Now ,I wY1,e rLr wart w ei Osi..e reh r ,e+✓IW M1ierM1 w
w agwr+
14. APPLICANT
SIGN MERE � F �L� L .. ti .... -_..' _ _ _ _ __ - -. —..
t' APPLICATION 6! TRANSFEROR '
15. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Count' of SAL1 BWIUU 11O _ - - Dote _ 9h- ° 9
I,ifr e..er .r sti 1. ii4v ewe vhwi ✓ rw seeiws axle wrlll W rw 111 N Yu 4r,iw r w rrYn 40410 J ee sari Iviiiir,
-_.- id Y v twTie ti.110 inaurlry de,1 e,Y1W
J. r,. eY ew✓10 nerl,wHi w p Wt M IM Y e„vee 10 wawdr, Y in,wdr
M' 40 Yi.ii+ Y er ewidi4 feiw,N✓ Iiesasl e✓w W w Nrrw r Y r. was+ e . Yew. c! I div war ewwww M eY irea,rd+ e
rlwr Y nd Ys✓w 4 wrwM h Y Wrr7rt W W ee MJr esriwK+. r Meerd esdr Y wit lib ..e 0, 104 s+rr M e Ili, r w MY
T ewi�w ttiti YY +e eew wYi+1 din wwidy M In s vYd Y tier. warYw. Y YM vie dw aswsew w w deY w rWY • e�
'p er✓riww r w !r r eMiei / w.w,lww r Y der.W w YMi r eie,r it ti,lwin NI Mr h .r1r ieear+lr rn M wMe.w Is, 40x40 Y "%
. .. _�ieirr r des 4ae w1A wi riiiYl.e IY.S, Y Y e.e.r.i � � _.
0 -CO Il1
•N i pY"14n� ,Lr..n rcr+..
APPLICATI( Volt ALCOHOUC ei'ciAGE LICENSE(S)
To, D'porimem of Alcobc," !leverage CootfN
121.50 S0cet -lvpilA�i)Il'T'_
Soaomensa, Calif. 95814 5A,1 r.rl.. coc.n..1
The underugn'd henbY °PPS's fu
Genus desc .bed or (ollarsr
2. NAMES) OF APPLICANTS)
ALPHA 56TA
4. Nome of 8vunnl
•Tien °A —�
!. locellan
OF 8wne1%—NU t
110753 Carnallau.
- \tr> =-etTS 1•' -t i for
Ii0
CT 8e
wd Steel
"N.1 ww. A . Ob W'—/.. fed...d.. Olin. oa,
OF LICENSE(5) FILE NO
G.T mu
___
OFF SALE (:a•WAL
Dot
Temp.
Appged "der S, c 24044 13
EBecbre Date, I U" -c-ce
ERech
3 MRS) OF TRANSACTION(S)
265-011 23-
'even F TOTAL .066.00
91!/71 -imo. RECEIPT NO. S �1"
7 Am PI'Inael lm•de
Gy Lmlh7 T"S
(lorr le•w1
L -c Y ►Tl
777 darooc vsva. r .•� ••••• -- - -- Y - on' of the Alcoholic
9. Hare Yov em been cm,ided of o felen7R 10 Hore You ever riobled an of the prorll%
Benrope Ce°I :I Act or .cgvbli "1 of tha Deparlmant per•
sanllq to Iha lcf7 � ��
'10 1 cf Ilxs OFF, Trcaon.
Il bpleb °'YES" amwer le gems 9 or 10 on on iflachmenl l.Nch shall ba deemed pu
12 Apphcanl oprcm (ol thof ar1Y monapar anple.ed m anaale liaenud premises .111 h_.. all the 9uoGfrcations of a L"C"", or
Its) h 1 h II f . lee ar came or perm;, to be violated O'Y Of Ih nvonl of Iha AlcehaTv: fA.a•ope ConMl Ad.
�,•,,�L 9 >y
13. STATE OF CALIFGeNIA Caunry of Do%
a•.w wJ•r .1 ✓wrr. .w.. rww .w J'rv0 u✓• Ww w•.w ..e Vr. IYI w ; Y •eWw+M w w •1 IM .wNwn. w ••n.:.••
.r•! N 14 Iw•.r.' ./01.�1�. V. "h"•.. V \• •eW..+• M !V 1I1 M te. •••e O• r.•.'
f Ww M M wMe+ rMnw 111•.•. wW Yw III M •V r••++ {r•• 4 4• MrI4.V
• P'Y YeN.•.M d \V.n M uu.+• M••1 M M •lit N YI M h •101•....• _ V,w Nr Y. F. r`ry IMI
w M\•M• M• wr 4w1 w nYVI lwwnr N 1M yr•.rf• w Mf..•1• Mrrn•• V t• aWwM ,•M• W 1.•W.J N .Wt I.'• ./Il.w�. Y 1
' IU M 1M {wWw •W +01'•' w /••.•••. ti^Iw 1• •0• hM V •M. h ...�•V d 0 M w V Nal rwn•rN 0' J
J I•n Y••M1•V N• 4n M t.t M wJ•r .wMnr •• YM .A Y 0.rw•nw =Y.+ {s •.M. M M/f.wr w hwaon•• .wl . n..•t" aJaOr V
4i•we w 1Y• w /�•L1w 01�'w'J IH 1.01 Y 11r•IN eelu.i0• uI
14. APPLICANT
SIGN HERE
APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 9j6/79
Cevn of 03"G Doe - �• ,
is. STATE CF UL'fORNIA �' n
.•. WY. t••tlr J rNM. wd. w•+ .11r JM.✓0 •M•• w, w••.i•. 0./ ••ru 111 Mr . Y Ikrw. w r u•Wn M1w 0• w• •w/w+• {sw
'�/0.0e Y h •NU'•re t�1w Vrr1w.0. Ye w�wuM r rt. JH •.wlw OrrMM•u w ti t•vll• PI Y• 10 1.1de �w .rrew{r V w1n••b
M1 W r 11.• wJM Mw•1•I M•.iM W� w. r .wJw •r• V It. •Mm'• M w le•r NL•w4 1Y M•• e•••w •1 YI Mew.l•O
rrJ•r 4 w r0. 10 �. Y nA+•` 0.-Sr w.M -AYe
1 R_.. ti� M w1{ .�•w Y wM.•/ M 11.• e.•1✓1
at M h M•1•• .,.4.4•• .•w.••e .. _ .—
1
DATE: October 17, 1979
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Council L City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: CONSULTANT'r 4REEMENT FOR "NORTH TOWN"
STREET 1. ..cMENT DESIGN SERVICES
Attached for Council appro i is the Consultant's Agreement for Engineering
design and construction sta "ing services in conjunction with the street
improvements for the "North Town" area, to be funded through HUD Block Grant
funds
The contract is %r1th C G Egnineering who was selected by an interview board
composed of myself, Dan Savicky with the County Comn unity Developmer" Depart-
ment and Councilman Bridge.
The contract has been approved by the Coun'v with the not to exceed amount of
$42=500.00 (see attached letter) Design will begin immediately ui•nn Council
execuRlon
Respectfully submitted,
f
"re A
Lloyoi3 Huhbs
Cit Engineer
LBH:deb
0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY — Co.," al Sow Baiwa'A
w », .�
+ w aNv 51-- LwaCVSa
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPLICNT IOCOI ," o• +•.,w
1111 EM MI9 eumn San esnurd,w, CA 93415 • 17141383-274S 1 �
Mr Llnyd Ilubbs September 24, 1979
P 0 Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: APPROVAL TO PROCEED
Entity City of Rancho Cucamonga_
Project Name North Town Str ict Irravementa_ Case No 325 =55230
Project Location Rancho Cucamonga CA -
Funding Year 1974 -80 CDBG Budget $ 2221,474
Funding Year
CDBG Budget
Funding Year CDBG Budget
Total Project Cos[ 222, »74 Other Funding i
The County of San Bernardino, the Community Development Block Grant grantee, has
reviewed your request of 9/19/79 and hereby approves of those materials X as
submitted (or) with changes identified, and authorized the above entity to
proceed with tbe- 2ollowing action:
Issue an Invitation to Bid for
Issue a Request for Proposal for
Award a Construction Contract to
X Award a Consultant Services Contract Amendment to C.G. Engineering (Contract
Amount $42,500
ENVIRONMENTAL IMIPROVEMENT AGENCY
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
R ANN SIRACUSA, Director
Aa
��40
D04ALD A SAVICXY
Contract Analyst
y •�•:,�. ' �:{ 1+9p' ,41 .�i1+. � V-a�. _ 04�,L1 eL14Y���»]+T•..�SJi��j'�_
0
0
U
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of ,
:979, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCANANGA, hereinafter referred to
as "CITY" and C G ENGINEERING, a California corporation, 2627 South Waterman
Avenue, San Bernardino, California, hereinafter referred to as 'ENGINEER."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, The City desires to obtain the services of the Engineer for
the preparation of plans, specifications and cost estimates for the
construction of curb and gutter, sidewalk a..d asphalt concrete paving
to the "North Town" area; and
WHEREAS, The Engineer is willing and able to render such services;
NON, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, agreements and
undertakings herein set forth and the faithful performance of them and
each of them by the respective parties, the parties agree and undertake
as inllows:
1 Sm loyment of Engineer.
City does hereby employ Engineer as an Independent
Contractor to perform field and office work and provide engineering
services in preparing and providing preliminary and final plans,
specifications and estimates, applications and necessary reports,
engineering data and information for curbs, sidewalks, and match -up
paving in the 'North Town" area for the following streets
a
eP•-
-1-
V - - — - -
26TH STREET - Curb and sidewalk along south side .
and match -up paving between Turner Avenue and
Marine Avenue
25TH STREET - Curb and sidewalk along both sides
and match -up ving between Turner Avenue and Marine
Avenue
24TH STREET - Curb and sidewalk both sides and
match -up paving between Turner Avenue and Marine
Avenue
HUMBOLT AVENUE - Curb and sidewalk north side and
match -up paving between Turner Avenue and Marine
Avenue •
CENTER AVENUE - Curb and sidewalk along both sides
and match -up paving between Humbolt Avenue and
26th Street
MARINE AVENUE - Curb and sidewalk along west side
and match-up 'paving between Humbolt Avenue and
26th Street
Reconnaissance. planning and preliminary cost estimates shall
also be provided for the following streets:
-2-
'1 t:3.��4�.4.r�� -sy.•: ;�) n�.•/! n .. -...� i _ \Y• i� J 't'.df. -_ i.�n i- w�.T -tC
M1)Z j. r � .
0
FERON STREET - Curb and sidewalk along south side
between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue
PAIN STREET - Curb and sidewalk along north side
and match -up paving between Archibald Avenue and
Ramona Avenue
REID AVENUE - Curb and sidewalks along both sides
and catch -up paving between Main Street and Feron
Street
The engineering services to be performed on either the streets
to be improved or streets having only preliminary work shall consist
of the appropriate following items:
• A. Preliminary Design
1 Meet with Citizen's Advisory Group to review project
approach, schedule, and identify specific problems
(four meetings are anticipated).
2 Meet with city Staff to coordinate design concepts
•nd project schedule.
3. Perform field surveys as folicws:
a) Obtain topography of existing streets within
right of way for streets to receive improve-
ments both sides, and for 1/2 width where
improvements are to be provided for one side
only
-3-
b) Topo to include location and identification
of trees, existing pavement limits, drainage
facilities, utilities, and other pertinent
facilities to enable a comprehensive design
to be completed
4. Research and plot all utilities on topo
5 Prepare preliminary design on base topo and
review with City
6. Prepare estimates of cost for work to be
completed to accordance with the preliminary plan
7. Prepare letter report and with recommendations
for completing the project. Include discussion
relative to street lights with recomcendation
8. Attend meetings with City, utility companies,
and other agencies as may be deemed necessary
B. Final Design
1. Prepare detailed construction drawings for proposed
improvements in accordance with City Stanuards
and recommEndatfons approved in preliminary eesign
phase
2. Prepare specifications and bidding documents
utilizing City's contract requirements and format
3. Prepare quantities and cost estimates
4. Submit plans to utility companies and complete
arrangements as may be required
-4-
•
S.
Submit plans, specifications and estimates to
City for review and approval Provide plans and
data as may be necessary to other agencies such
as the San Bernardino County Flood Control District
for review, and permits as may be required
6.
Complete review and coordination with San Bernardino
County Office of Community Development to insure
conformance with applicable Federal Standards
7
Provide City with 25 sets of plans and bid documents
upon receipt of approval and establishing bidding
schedule
D.
Assist City in obtaining bids and evaluation thereof
g.
Attend meetinps as necessary to provide coordination
•
of plan preparation Provide periodic reports of
progress when meetings are not required
10. Provide City with all field survey data, reports,
cross sections, design backup data, and other
pertinent materials and documents received or
Prepared du -ing the project
C Construction Surveying
1 Provide one set of rough grade stakes, also used
for clearing limits, curb and gutter, and blue tops
at centerline where applicable
2 Provide City with three copies of checked cut
sheets for distribution to the inspector and
contractor
-S-
a ��_�_ - ,y.i_ ... .. e„ __.. -. �L �i ..s-. . • .. - ^' :.- 1y'7'Et .=i'�b"i4
�t a'r7 - LLL
3 Prepare all survey tie data and •
calculations as necessary to complete
staking
2. Compensation:
In consideration of performance of this agreement in connection
with the Project in the manner herein nrescribed, the City agrees to pay
Engineer for his services as follows:
1) Item A. Preliminary Design shall be billed
at the prevailing hourly rates, a copy of
which is attached hereto and shall not
exceed $10,700.
2) Item 0, Final Design shall be billed at the
prevailing hourly rates, a copy of which is •
attached hereto, and shall not exceed ;20,800.
3) Item C, Construction Surveying shall he billed
at the prevailing hourly rates and is estimated
at $11,090.
4) Engineer shall be reimbursed at the attached
prevailing rates for printing, copying and
reproduction required in connection with this
contract.
3. Method of Payment to the Engineer:
City agrees to pay Engineer monthly for services rendered
under this agreement after performance has been completed and Engineer
has submitted a billing therefore to City. O
-6-
y_ 1 2 .. -,':.
S4. Time of Completion:
Time is of the essence in this agreement, and Engineer shall
complete the work in this agreement within the following time frame:
1) Prelimim ey Design - 6 weeks after receipt
of the Notice to Proceed from City
2) Final Design - 9 weeks after receipt of the
Notice to Proceed from City
3) Construction Surveying - Within 24 hours of
receipt of notice that staking is required
5. Termination:
The right is reserved by the City to terminate the agreement
at any time upon written notice to Engineer in the event the Project or
Aany portion thereof is to be abandoned or indefinitely ^ostponed, or in
the use the Engineer's services, in the judgment of the City, are
unsatisfactory or because of the Engineer's failure to prosecute the
work with diligence or within the time limits specified; or because of
Engineer's Inability to perform. In any such case, the Engineer shall
be paid the value of the. services rendered up to the time of termination
by prorating the lump sum fee for elapsed time under this agreement. If
the services of the Engineer are terminated for fault on his part, the
City ray procure the completion of the services or work in such manner
as it deems best and shall charge to the Engineer any excess cost over
that provides for in the agreement or any damages the City may sustain
by reason of the default.
-7-
.,
6. Insurance: •
The Engineer agrees to maintifn to full force during the
term of this agreusent the following insurance:
A. Comprehensive public liability insurance in the
mount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000)
for any occurrence resulting in bodily injury to
or the death of any one person, and In the amount
of five hundred thousand dollars (S500,00C) for
any occurrence resulting in bodily injury to or
death of more than one person.
B. Automobile property damage liability to the
amount of one hundred thousand dollars (S100,000)
C Property damage liability for other than
automobile in the amount of five hundred
thousand dollars ($500,000) each accident.
D. 6lorlwen's Compensation insurance under
the applicable provisions of the California
Labor Code.
7. Ownership of k,uments:
All drawings, tracings, and master copies of documents, survey
notes and studies made by Engineer in performing services hereunder shall
be the property of the City and shall ho delivered by Engineer to City
after completion of its services hereunder.
-8- 40
g, Assf� assignable by Engineer as to any
This contract shall not be
prior written consent of the city
1n violation of this provision, or any
right or duties hereunder without t e snare and cancel
and any assignment attempted ive the city cause to term
involuntary assignment, shall 9
{s a9re.me ❑t the same as for a breach thereof
to city is that of independent
y, HoldHold H
Engineer is solely liable to
Engineer's relationsh P
en the parties hereto, parties
contractor. g °twe caused
agent' and independent °0inc;4ding and
deaths
its employees. 9
costs, damages or injury i a ents, or independent
for all loss. f Engineer, its employees, 9
erformed or due to be performed by
by any act or omission o
• contractors relating
to the services P harmless in
Engineer hereunder, and Engineer shall hold and save a tY
connection therewith,
tmination: employee or
10. Non 01str against any
The Engineer will not dAscr race. �colo religion, sex, or
applicant for enPloymvnt because of
The Engineer will take affirmative action rested during ensure
national origin and that emDloYees are t
color, religion, sex, or
that aDPltcants are employed,
employment. without regard to their race. not be limited to,
fn. Such action shall include. iont or transfer; recruit -
national origin. u oradi
E�mPlovment, D_ ng• rates of pay or
the
following layoff or termination:
meni or recruitme
nt advertising: nino. including
other forms of compensation; and selection for tra
apprenticeship. The Engineer agrees to post in conspicuous places. •
available to employees and applicants for employment. notices to be
Provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
114 WITNESS 1MEREOF the parties hereto have executed this
agreement the day and year first nereinbefore written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM IGA
City Attorney Hayor
ATTEST C G ENGINEERING
A California Cotporation
City Clerk Fre, ent
-10- 0
Z.
r-
"a
PREVA1l itIG HOURLY RATES
JUNE 1979 - JULY 1960
OFFICE $44 CO /Hr.
Principal Engineer (Professional) 42 00/1!r-
Project Manager (Pratessional) 39,00 /Hr
Associate Engineer 30.00 /Hr.
Designer- Draftseun 25 00 /Hr.
Draftsnun 20.00 /Hr.
Engineering Aide 11 00 /Hr.
Clerical
FIELD
(Professional)
42.00/11r.
Resident Engineer
39 00 /Hr.
Inspector (Licensed)
30 00 /Hr.
Inspector (Unlicensed)
39.00 /Hr.
Field Survey Supervisor (Licensed)
76 00 /Hr
2 Man Survey Party
98,00 /I1r.
3 Man Survey Party
60,00 /DaY
Electronic Measurinq Device
MISEELLl,EOUS SERVicES AHD EXPENSES
0.15 /Mi.
Mileage Reproduction
Lost ♦ 10I
Prints. copying.
and Miscellaneous Materials
cost
Octside Consultant Services
FOR.VIA82400 • (1)4) 62 4 2120
WA.rERMAN AVENUE. SUIYE
E . EAN BERNARO1No. CW ��
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
TO: City Council d City .onager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9436
The subject tract was approved by San Bernardino County on September 16, 1976
Due to the moratorium and various uther time extensions, the tract expiration
date is November, 1980. The tract is located east of Haven Avenue at Victoria
and consists of 27 lots. The developer, Chevron Land and Development Company,
has prepared the plans and documents for compliance with the conditions of
approval and requests recording of the subject tract map.
The+ developer has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and
securities, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly development. The type
and amounts are as follows:
• Performance Bond (Road) $106,000
Labor d Material (Road) $106,000
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution dflectr ^;
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council
and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf
of the City The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording
Respectfully srbmitted,
`Lloyd 8 Hubbs
City Engineer
LBH:deb
,®
I?
;' •9r N > ni iii „ �� Q! ���
v b HAVEW $ /
• 311 � 7TT•
>( • ••\ as 17 "r
16\0 15 H. 14 0 13 �1 I \
SS 3
.� a Or
\ Q
19 ° Co
\1 a ao
( o \9 H�10
\\ ZO `
G \ ee\�.� \ I I
cb' (o
3r I 93 1 ra de '9o-
93 \ 1 c's,' �.
04 0
112 do
F l a C to I{' 6 ` ^� •L 1 r 1
r ppp i
` N
"A's
a,•,• �;a x.1500'
i r i ra � o "l1 iti 6O en I 4 • tP I �. 1 ° •� 10
C� r3
n23 S 24 4 ° 5,
/' I^
)22 b C3
as 10 ce a+ I
I as
so
>^
26 a 10 , l7 °
to
i ( U ?b2
' F IS (
1 j r.7 �ma /
11 Br1 Q 14 �I 20
O r26
' i i <s °O I roa pl i2o rMr; 1
91
RESOLUTION NO :9-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE PITY GF RANCHO
I1P OWIEENTCSECURITYT .�AtDF APPROVING
INALIIAPIMPROVEMENT
OFVE RERACT NO 9436
WHEREAS. the Tentative Map of Tract No (1436, consisting of 21
lots, suomitted by Chevron Land and Development Company Subdivider.
roved by said City as p,t,vided
located east ed Haven at Victoria has been submitted to the City Of
liance
Sanchu Cucamonga by said Subdivider and app
in the S,.idivision tap Act of the State of California, and in comp
in the requirements of Ordinance No 28 of said City' and prerequisite
,lith IiHLREAS, to meet the requirements established Subdivider p
to ap�rival of the Final tap of said herewith said rS approvalrandseiecut eon
the 1 orovement Agreemert s.ibmi•ted
by ,alj City, together with t900inandMsufficient9i for dedicatiora for
y� offerin
an, sjynits for approval
,iu011 ,se the streets delineated thereon: roil of the :ity
NOW. THERFFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City un•
.if Aincnu Cucamonga. California, as follows:
• That said Improvement Agreement be and the san. is approved said
City, the City i Clerk h is i authorized t toeattes[ 'thereto; and,
and the tlayor That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content !hereof by ,he City
Attorney, and,
1 That the offovedfand thec City Llerkthe s authorized to execute
same be app
the Lartificate thereon on behalf of said City 1919
PASSED, APPROVED, a,., ADOPTED this day of
..TTEST
S
AYES
NOES
ABSEIIT
L ty erk 21
Liyor
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
To: City Council S City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9437
The subject tract was approved by San Bernardino County an September 16, 1976.
Due to the moratorium and e.Nrious other time extensions, the tract expiration
date is November, 1980 The tract is located east of Haven Avenue at Victoria
and consists of 28 lots Tho developer, Chevron Land and Development Company,
has prepared the plans and documents for compliance with the conditions of
approval and requests recording of the subject tract cap.
The developer has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and
securities, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly development. The type
and amounts are as follows:
performance Bond (Road) $124,000
Labor d Materiil (Road) 5124,000
RECOMMENDATION:
it is reconmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City Council
and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf
of the City The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording
RReessppeectfully submitted,
L1gyA 8 Hubbs
C1 Engineer
LBH:deb
2z
{7 r •. ao c' J 22 a 123 Zq I
o
°t 251 g 3 • is N 2G
/ 144' S 4 f
2 $ 2 1 4. /
l7 0
d• I• i Q. I 118 $
60 6 / a,
4. O 27 � la +o u t W 1
is /$
fig= Q Q
II 1 �•� 20
nz I u, r / c 4 r el
loa O .140 0 � Ice
I m I 0� 1 1301
lO
a Q' 'o R• �� �O Q'
7 is 112�Y36l 2� %ST�.
- o ZG I
a. a 0 i m
r u•a.ex I
Ierr c 4&0' 23 C
a
I l04 I Ic
ID. IH 2t 11 I
yi I I 'loir 4A °s. P l I-- 111
„a v v a' 2�
I es I Iso II ss 13:� Ia 90' 1 00•
0' `
l
I =l,i (1Pr —--
1 1
1 1
m�.
23
RLSOLUTION NO 79 -84
A RESOLU71011 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
1NPROViEl101TGSECURITY. ANDPFINALO;IAP IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, 09437
WHEREAS, the Tentative Flap of Tract No 9437, consisting of 28
lots, submitted by Chevron Land and Development Company Subdivider,
located east of Haven at Victoria has been submitted to the City of
in the SubdivisionyMapiAAcLubditheeState approved Cali ornia iandiin compliances
with the requirements of Ordinance No 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the Final Hap of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the I orovement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City, together with goor and sufficient improvement security.
and subnits for approval said Final Hap offering for dedication for
public uee the streets delineated thereon
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of ^ancho Cucamonga California, as follows;
1 That said Improvement A regiment be and the same is approved
and , Mayor City Clerk is
i h iauthorized to attest thereto, and, said
City , the
2 subject to
approval nasS to form and content thereof bydthefCityent,
Attorney; aM,
3 same for ClerkUis f delineating
uthorized to execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City
PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this day of .1979.
AYES:
NOES
ABSENT
ATTEST
City Clerk
yor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
0 MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
To: City Council & City Manager
FROMr Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: TRACT NO. 9444
The subject tract was approved by San Bernardino County on August 16, 1976.
Due to the moratorium and various other time extensions, the tract expiration
date is January, 1980. The tract is located on the northeast corner of Banyan
Street and Amethyst Street and consists of 20 lots. The developer, Rancho De
Cucamonga (Mark III Homes, Inc.), has prepared the plans and documents for
compliance with the conditions of approval and requests r =ording of the
subject tract rap.
The developer has supplied the Engineering Division with an Agreement and
securities, sufficient in nature, to insure orderly development. The type
and amounts are as follows:
Performance Letter of Credit (Road) $76,000
Labor d Material Letter of Cred :t (Road) $76,000
7ECWtEDDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map an behalf of the City Council
and the Mayor and City Clerk to accept the agreement and securities on behalf
of the City. The City Engineer shall forward the map for recording.
Respectfully submitted,
L1 d B Hibbs
C1 y Engineer
LBH:deb
0
?—
Mi
I HAU I NO 9444- '
IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO on
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
/tlf • Itmr p M./nfuf OI tJf'V v YC A n. •++•rJ.NCM1. Hv: r 4,1..II w
r .1
dj
M 4YwYY Jr.IOYV. 1�0I
�/r Yr�Mw M1.•/w M.wwYl•vw. ✓w•/
YY•iNI• %/wY/Y/.1 N; .IW t+
1 MCJMI
� WJ.t fJ .UYfl. laL
YIIMw.IV.AYi I
Q•r 4 —way r..,t ✓. CIY
rnu+ nN
_ /UTUAA_ 2�_ AACT �L7s —� Q.zt•
J /�••� /.y..Y.n•w VN 1
i � 'It. II 12 a`"' uarY•uN
/w/W O I6. CI
• 1 \� \•I I ,/ y 1 I Y pM to
.1100✓1
�I f.r rwwh
IO+ � a II I �' R J;,I'N�
•- n •
c .�\ IOi awul•,N,
n
wn
'�N tirti�ww~I'n��;
as
z
'-I
1
20 19 Is
I aml aaa•.n slug � r &C* b K ataa4wlf' �_�•» r i �:')' sou
J
' 2�
FESOLUTION NO. 79 -33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
I,IpROVIEIiENTCSECURiNTY, AND PFINAL 14APPOFVTRACT NORE AGREEMENT.
9444
WHEREAS. the Tentative Hap of Tract NO 9444, consisting of 20
lots, submitted by ^ancho De Cucamonga Subdivider, located at the
northeast corner of Amethyst and Banyan has been oved bytsaidto the City
of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and t e No 28 of said
aof the State of California,
City as provided in the Subdivision Hap nd
an] in ,ampiience with the requirements of Ordinanc
IV: and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements establ tshed as has offered
to ap royal of the Final tiap of said Tract said Subdivider has offered
the 1•nrovenent Agreementthu9 good and zufftcientrimprovement security
by by s3,d City. tog
pool icoases Cfor :treetsal Saida final Hap offering for dedication for
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
Of Ian'ro Cucamonga. California. as follows:
I That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 15 aoDroved
a the mayor • City. the C'tyi Clerkh is i authorized toeattest thereto; atd hal of
and,
That said improvement Security is accepted as good and suufficient,
subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the ty
Attorney. and. e Final Hap
1 are beeapprovedf dedication r
and the City Clerk is s is authorizedd to i execute
the certificate thereon on behalf of said City.
PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this __day of__. 1979
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ATTEST
LtyCerk 2 `
ayor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA11ONG4
MEIfORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
TO: City Council 6 City Manager
FRO-N: Lloyd HubbS, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 4805
attached resolution author
the a es the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign
The s
This map was prepared l ocated an Engin Southtside of Church Street between from
developable property
Ramona Avenue and Archibald Avenue filing -
There, are no improvement conditions for this maP
RE�OICSER011T1�h:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the and iforward itltoithe CountyZ authorizing
the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the ma
Recorder
Respectfully s)tbmitted,
Lloyd B Hubbs
Ci`Cy Engineer
LBH:deb
C
Wit
I
i
PARCEL MAP N24805
SCaW P • a0'
11CaT9w9a Isis IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAR'lM. STATE OF CALFOWAA
THE fall K d TK Hp1l, K O TK MO[THVtlT 114
01 Tac IN M SECT[w Z. 1G.vlw l aG1TN.
,YK c .9111. Sao Kft w YSC NC W,0"
mot•% rt
...a .+.. sra aw.fco s.[wxf .a.[c+.ow u•
i i
�• "
<n> [wws...[<r.NO u.t
ab.T. aa..a as cf.. rci cr
e.w.l< /JO�O.wO<2
i �
cr. aa, rla aw nNVy..
S
••
.r p•Y .Vfa IO
�11
"_�L
CH CN -
wao_ STREET
_
/
}
4L
d
�
RESOLUTION 110 79 -85
S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL IWP MIBER 4005
(TENTATIVE PARCEL IIAP NO 4805)
WHEREAS, tentative parcel nap number 4805, submitted by !Marlborough
Develotnent Corporation and consisting Z parcels, located on Church Street
east of Archioald Avenue being a divisidr of Township 1 south, Range 7
west aas approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
and,
WHEREAS. Parcel flap Number 4805 is the final map of the division
of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map: and.
WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite
to approval of the final man by the City Council of said City have now
been rat:
110',1, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Pancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Yap Number 4805 be and
the sane is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to
present same Lo the County Recorder to be filed for record
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of_, 1979.
40 AYES*
NOES
ABS.-NT:
AT, EST
ty erk
I?
IT
yor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPIONGA
�� • MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
TO: City Council d City Manager
FRO>i: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineen�eg
SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR - RELEASE OF BONDS
Minor Subdivision H76 -0198 - Release of Storm DraiN Channel Letter of Credit
Located on the east side of Amethyst Street at Valley View
Owner Harold E. Milier
Miller Homes, Inc.
DeCarlc Center
9678 Central Avenue
Montclair, California 91763
Letter of Credit (Storm Drain Channel) $17,600
NOTE: The improvements and conditions have been ben per
approved plans for the Storm Drair Channel
Tract 9298 - Accept roads and release bond
Located on the South side of Vicara Drive between Sapphire Street
and Jasper Street
Dwner: Manfred Hall
2124 Chestnut Street
Diamond 2.r, California 91765
Performance Bond (Road) $34,000
NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the road improvement plans and it is
recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve-
ments include, curb, gutter, paving, walls and street
signs.
n
t
v.
3l
City Council - Bond Releases
Page 2
October 17, 1979
0
Tract 9634 - Accept roads and release bond
Located on the south side of Banyan Street between Beryl Street
and Hellman Avenue
owner: Chavanne Realty, Inc
28041 South Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 213
Rancho Palos Verdes, California 90274
Perforiunce Bond (Road) $70,000
NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in
accordance with the road improvement plans and it is
recommended that the roads be accepted. The improve -
ments include curb. gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls
and street signs
0
n
U
C12
E NTA,T'IVE .. MAF -
NO. I
R A C ..
TV n SAN BERNARDINO
IN THE VUU,„ .
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF THE COUtI
BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT I, BLOCK II, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEA
OF ASSOCIATION,
SA AB RN. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
OF SAN BERNARDINO, _ _ _
u
VICINITY MAP
SCALE. 1" = 500'
0—CA
W
`.
' Id 5L 691 E W
it
• ail :e .
— :1- 1E»1E 9 • L m. Y�t4.w3'�°y • a!!v •.+ __�
»r •aYa•___III-YTTT
�, . I;,` I ..� 4 3 �• 4 y- ill t � sg
•.! . » »•.. � icon Ile F9
I 4 ` cd 33• t
8 a ' iy 11 au!•o.
•„ C 131,o F I v 4 E� m i "Tii c- ?i� S` �e
•V •• !^y - p I m t a
m /[S F .aaro• a
� E �
0-
��o((i �I �
I Y�• iC I,s I � . ;
�x�pea III Z •II? .•a. »," i —
Qz��� � .I � Inn s S •u.u,. I E i I m, c:
L)'$a
to
a 4 °• n I
t .turn+•
lit
w
i.
(i
al o •
j5 I n»
y > iljT �• a S I T E .il a.w /� f-
Syiy 41. 11
is
2
ORDINANCE NO. 88
AN ORDINANCE OF THE LIT° CO'JNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL tNUMJ3ER
229 - 021 -59 FROti A -1 TO il-2 FOR 38 56 ACRES LOCATED Oil THE
NORTH SIDE OF ARROW, 1,300' EAST OF 114TERSTATE 15
AS FOLL0.15 THE Cl Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA DOES ORDAIN
SECTION I The City Council hereby finds and determines
the-7-675-wing:
A. That the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, following a Public hearing
held in the time and canner prescribed by law,
recormends the rezoning of t'e property herein-
after described, and this City Council has held
a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed
by law as duly heard and considered said recom-
r:endatlon
B That thin rezoning is consistept with the
General flan of the City of Rancho Cucamunga
C This rezon,ng will have no significant environ-
rvntal impact as provided in the Negative
Declaration filed herein
SECTION 7 The following described real property is hereby
rezoned -in the manner stated, and the zoning m,.- is he,e5y
arended accordingly
A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to H -2 (Heavy Ind,istri3l,
Said property is located on the north side of Arrow Route,
1300' east of Interstate 15 known as Assessor's Farcel Ilo
229 - 021 -59
SECTION 3 The ltayur shall Sion •his Ordinance and the
,ty erk shall attest t^ the sane, -1 the City Cleih shall
cause the same to be pub.isned nithin fifteen ,)5) days after
its Passage, at last once in The ,ally Report. d newspaper of
general circulatio.i oublished in the City of Gntario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, wlifornia
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of 1979
AYES
'IDES
A8SENT
ATTEST
My Clerk
I:1
tayor
0
M E M 0 4 A N 0 U M
DATE October 10, 1979
TO City Manager and Members of the City Council
FRG'I Assistant City 10nager4V
,Ua„EC7 Request for an Ordinance establishing a Rancho Cucamonga
Advisory Commission (2nd Reading)
The attached Ordinance establishing an Advisory lanmission is coming
bnc+ •o Council for second reading with one modification At Council's -
r -quest Section 3, Advisor Commission llembershl , has been odified to
mono +nt frpn each geograp is community by zip code
wctinn 1 shalt now read as follows
• Advisory Commission Membership
section 3 The Advisory Committee shat' consist of a total of
fifteen `T-M rembers with five (5) appointed from each of the three ;3)
ieo raonic areas designated by zip code in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
ny cly Alta Lora (91701), Cucamonga (91730), and Etiwanda (91739)
'lc•bers of the Advisory Commission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga
and %na'l be appointed by the City Council The Mayor shall submit to
the Council the rame of any person proposes for appointment to the
Ad++sory Commission and upon such appointment by the Council, the name
of tie appointee shall be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting
E
00
ORDINANCE NO 87
AO ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
TO
cucNAONGA.
N .All ADVISORY.CAPACITYGTOI ADVISORY YCOUfC S
COUNCIL
PLANNING COMISSION
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follows:
sEC -1711 1 There is hereby created and established in the city an
��;ary Commission
Role of Advisory Commission
SECT: 1 2 The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act in an
lvisiry
and perform tsuch other advisory Planning functions a!C ' may bet community
delegated to
the •*n•nsory Commission from time to time by the Planning Commission cr
cit - oun_11
Advisory ion tlemhership
'EC-, 1 The Advisory Committee shall consist of a total of fifteen
. 7 =7_ Ders with five (5) .ppointed from each of the three (3) geographic
a
Ir-a iasi•ated by zip code in the City cf Rancho Cucamonga, namely
1.1 •vi sory ado^mtssionshall(9be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and
of
'oin ile thepnameeofbany the
person prof sed foreappainLrsntl to thetpdvt:ary
i000inteenshall upon
recordedpie henminuteseOf thei Councilname the
meeting
Terms of Appointment
'ECTIM 4 The fifteen (15) memMrs of the Advisory Commission
rnitTa y appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot
Thereafter all terms shall be for four (4) years Three (3) members from
each of the three subcommittees (Alta Loma), (Cucamonga). and (Etiwaoda)
shall serve a term of four (4) years and shall continue until their
resnective terms expire unless sooner removed as provided in this
Ordinince Two (2) members from each of the three (3) subcommittees
Shill serve a term of two (2) Years and shall continue in office until
their ordinance ifva vacancy unless scene--
other t�nvby expiration Ofn,.he s
tern 3f office, shall be filled by appointment by the Itayor with the
approval of the Cmmcil fr :he unexpired term
37
Removal of Members
SECTIM S. Any member of the Advisory Commission may be removed at
any time by a majority vote of the City Council In addition, the
ndvt,nry Commission may recommend to the City Council removal of any
^e,-oer of the Adsisnry Commission who has violated any meeting attendance
D0110 cs that may be established by resolution
Regular Meetings
SECTIO'I S The dates upon which and the hour and place at which any
,:Fc --.Tr re?ting shall be held shall be fixed by resolution or minute
action of the City Council
nfficers
.E,'- XI r Each subcommittee of the Advisory Commission shall select
a �-iirnzrson to preside at regular meetings on a monthly rotating
Nicts
Minutes
SECTIO'I R The Secretary of the Commission shall cause the minutes
-mgular. adjourned regular, and special meetings to be kept; end
Shall is soon as possible after each meeting, cause a copy of the
n,n6tes to be forwarded to each member of the Commission and to the City
Clmr� The City Clerk or designee will serve as secretary for the Advisory •
Commission
SEC' "1 9 T*e Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
snil, attest to the same, and the City Clerk sha11 cause the same to be
Publish -d within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in
Tho Oatty Re ort, a newspaper of general circula tIon published in the
M e of Gn�, California, and circulated in thq City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California
PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED th{s1ftl day of October, 1979
ATTEST
AL[S
NOFS:
AaSE>ft:
City Clerk
WRG
Mayor
n
U
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 0, 1979
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Jack Han, Director of Cormunity Development
Subject: MORATORW4 WIRATTON
As the City Courc.l will recall, on August 15, 1979, they approved an
extmslon of Ordinance No. 66 to November B. 1979 In light of recant
that the Council considerrans extensionrto thea Plan, it in necessary
moratorium. -
We have prepared Ordinance 80 64-C (attacited) vhirh would extend the mora-
torlum. `action 2 leaves blank the date which the moratorium would expire.
At the time of the writing of this report we have no recommendation as to
the date the moratorium should be extended The decision by the Council as
• to what date the moratorium should is extended should be made at the time
of the Council meeting.
that time for the Councils' consideratio additional information
Rcspebtiul>y Jbmittel.
�, / �'r
JAIX.GAN; ditc�io f
Community Development
L
JL: Wl:nm
Attachment: City Council Ordinance No 6. -C
3F
ORDINANCE NO. 64C (URGENCY)
r
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM IMPOSED
BY ORDINANCE 110 64 AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
The City ,ouncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds that:
A. Further time is needed for the study and
Preparation of a comprehens've grm.Yth
management program for the City u
B The expiration of Ordinance Ito '648
Cal N0 by its terms on November B, 1979, will not
_ be in the best interests of the City
& and said expiration date should be extended
as hereinafter provided
SECTION 2 Section 6 00 Ordinance No 641.0or the City of
TFancFoTcamonga is hereby amended to read a: allows
'SECTION 6: a moratorium Imposed by this Ordinance
shall expire p ,
SECTION 3: 7nis rdinance is hereby declared an urgency
measure necessary for the immediate protection and preservatior
of the public peace, safety, and welfare stated in Section 1
J hereof and in Ordinance No. 64 and shall take effect innediately
upon adoption.
SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
tZ`itY er shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after
its passage, at least once in The Daily Rejrt, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of�ntario, California,
and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979
AYES
NOES
ABSENT
ATTEST yor
y er ,'y
r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMA
MEMORANDUM
Date: October 17, 1979
To: City Hanger and Members of the City Council
From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE - An Ordinance establishing a Design Review
Committee and Criteria for Architectural Review for development within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga
BACrLRCUND: Urier the direction of the Planning Commission, Staff has prepared
a Design Review Ordinance for your coulderatlon. Based upon discussions and
special study sessions and public hearings held with the Planning Commission,
the attached Ordinance has been formulated Generally, the Ordinance creates a
Design Review Committee consisting of two Planning Commission members and the
Director of Community Development or his designee The Committee meets [vice
monthly or more often if needed The time of the meetings shall be set by Reso-
lution of the Planing Commission. As Committee members change, there may be
•need for change in the meeting time depending upon the ability of the Committee
to meet Therefort, a Resolution setting the meeting time can be easily changed
to meet the needs of the Committee
The Ordinance alum sets forth criteria which the Committee will use in reviewing
the design of a project In addition to the criteria listed in the Ordinance;
the Ordlrance gives the authority to the Committee to develop further design er1-
terta and elements
The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 26, 1979, held a public
hearing to consider public testimony on the proposed ordinance. Upon completion
of the public hearing and review of the Ordinance by the Planning Commission, they
recommended adoption of the Ordinance and Issuance of a Negative Declaration
Part 1 of the Initial Study is attached for your review. Staff has completed
Part iI of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse Impacts on the
emrironn t as a result of this proposal
RECML4MATION The Planning Commission recommends
nance and issuance of a Negative Declaration.
Respectf y /' fitted,
JACK 1.4, filrectur of
® Community Development
JL::IV:rm
Attachments: Part I, Ir leial Study /
City Co,mr 11 Ordinance
adoption of the attached Ordi-
C <
CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
INITIAL STUDY
PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant
Environmental Assessment Review :set $76.00
For all projects requiring environmental review, this
form must be completed and submitted to the Devalop=nt
Review Committee through the department where the
project application is made. Upon receipt of this
application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare
Part II of the Initial Study. The Davelopment Review
Committee will meet and take action no later than ten
(10) days before the public meeting at which time the
project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of
three determinations: 1) The project till have no
environmental impact and a Nogative Declaration will be
filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact
and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or
3) An additional information report should be supplied
by the applicant giving further information concerning
the proposed project. •
APPLICANT'S NAAfE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:
NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE 4F PERSON TO BE CONTACTED
CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: ,�)PGK -A S61 01RCXff/:'R.. GF
rnMAAI)n)uN F30�1Q17PMna1Tr
,
LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 1A.)
)JDA12 _
LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AIM
FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMIT..:
mate
I -'Z
-�M
L
F1
. � r
nROJECP DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AUTO SQUARE ^FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND
PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY:
DESCRIBE THE ENVIR2M,tENCAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE
INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES),
ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE
OF SURROUNDING PPOPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ALLY
EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)
is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series
of cumulative actions, which although individually small,
may as a whole have significant environmental impact? _
No
A
WILL T1tIS PROJECT:
YES NO
1. Create a substantial change in ground
contours?
2. Create a substantial change in existing
noise or vibration?
T 3. Create a substantial change in demand for
municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)!
4. Create changes in the exiating zoning or'
general plan designations?
S: Remove any existing trees? Row many?
6. Create the need for use or disposal of
potentially hazardous materials such as
toxic substances, flammables or explosives?
Explanation of any YES answers above:
IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of
residential units, complete the form on the
next page.
40
CERTIPICAT :.'ON: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above ani .n the attached exhibits present the data and
information rsyuired for thin initial evaluation to the
best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
information presented are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge and belief. I further understand that
additional information may be required to bo submitted
before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Develapoent
Review Committee.
Date Signature
Title
- - -- - - ° -- 3 IT -- --
ORDINANCE NO 89
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE
WHIM ESTABLISHES A DESIGN REVIEW COSMITTEE AND DESIGN
REVIEW CRITERIA
The City Council of the City of hu rho Cuc:vnoega, California,
I• -n •.•r,t, ordain as follows -
CFCTOf`1 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following:
That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
did to its Resolution No 79 -61 following a public hearing
held In the time and manner described by law recommend the
establishment of a design review procedure and committee
hereinafter described and this City Council has held a public
hearing in the time and manner described I- law and his duly
heard and considered said reccmendatlon.
4 That the City Council has revteveu and considered the Design
Review Ordinance and all testimony and comments pertaining
to it and finds the Design Review icoc lures to be adequa-c in
scope and cortent
• That the Donlan Review Ordinance will have no significant
environmental impact as provided in the negative declaration
tiled herein
PURPOSES
N Thr Citi rf Ranr amonga finds that a design review
pr. con will sup{ the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga
Le ,rml Plan, as it stresses quality urban design standards
The Cltv further finds that the quality of certain residential.
Institutional, commercial, and Industrial uses has a substantial
Impa,t .-pan the visual appeal, environmental oundneis.
economic atahillty, and property values of the City This
Ordinance Ig not tntended to restrict ttagination, Innovation
or varlet, but rather to focus on design principles which
,an reqult In reitive iraglnative solutions for the project
and a ouallt. de%iAn for the City It l,, t',crcforv, the
pnrpoge of this Resolution to:
1 Reiw{nite the Interdependrn.e of land •a 1•r.•q qnd
aesthetics tnd provide- a method by which the Cite may
inplvrz vnt this interdependenre to Its benefit
L Eatourage the orderiv and harmonious appearance of
strueruren and property within the City along with
®
a-goclated fartlltieq, such an sign,, landscaping,
parking .areis. and gtreetn
4
Ordln,m c No. 89
1'a , _
3 Maintain the public health, safety and general welfa..e,
and property throughout the City •
4 Assist private Lad public developments to be more
cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of
developments
5 Reasonably ensure that new developments, including
residential, institutional, co ®ereinl and industrial
developments, do not have an adverse aesthetic, health,
safety or architecturally related impact upon existing
adjoining properties, or the City to general
6 Implement those rec Nons of the City's Coneral Plan
which specifically refer to th, preservation and
enhancement of the particular character and unique
assets of this City and its harmonious development.
SFfrl_1q l; CREATION OF THE DESIGN REV)EM COMMITTEE
1 A Design Review Cemaittee (DRC) is hereby created and
shall be responsible for the Implementation and administration
of this Ordinance
1 Composition
The Design Review Committee shall consist of Mrce
(3) members One shall be the Director of Community
Development or his designee and two shall be members
of the Planning Commission
1 Appointment and Ten of Office
The Planning Commission shall elect nap of Its mmbers
to the DRC The Director of Community Development or
hie deslgneo shall be the Secretary of the DRC Of
the first two Commission members appointed, one shall
have a corm of six (6) months and the other ahall have
a term of twelve (12) months Thereafter, all terms
+hail be twelve (11) months
I Removal from Office
Any member of the ra.mlttce may be removed at inv time
by the Planning Commission
4 Neat inas
The Dest Review Committee shall meet f twice
man 11, y Q neeu.a The time and place of ouch meeting
shall be set by Resolutinn of the Planning Commission.
The Design Review Cocrsittee may arrange additional meetings •
at any time in order to process applications within
rn•gmrred ttCe periods
�Y
„r, i,, , Nn Hq
P i4,. '
i Rules
A simple majority of members shall eon-tit- ca a gliorUn
The Zommittee shall review a project in accordance with
the Ordinance and file recommendations with the approving
authority Such recosaendationA shall be consolidited by
the Planning Division of the Coramuntty Developmen, Department
as conditions for final approNil The DRC shall have the
right to develop its own rules and regulations for conducting
its meetings in addition to developing and adopting
design criteria and standards
5 CT JURISJICIION OF REVIEW
The Design Review Committee shall have the authority to review
the architecture - -d site plan elements of all residential
rtTwttT ), c=erc Lal
ind indi.striaj developments, additions, remtdelings, relocations.
Issuance of a building permit or which require a Conditional
Ise Permit, Site Approval or Director Rcvlew. The review con
consider the use of design a ments suet: as, but not limited
to, exterior design ax] matai ials, landscaping, architecture,
site plan relationships, gracing, signb wall or buffering
technique9.
ri ;I •,_ DESIG4 CONSIDERATIONS
1 Thr DRC shall, in reviewlug projects covered v this Ordinance,
roon1der su -h design aspects is the relationship of building
to mite: the relationship of huilding and Alto to surrounding
area; land +cape and site treatment; building design and riatet lals;
signs; and aiscollaneous structures and street furniture
The recommendations of the OR( will be based upon the project
conforming to the following criteria:
1 The design and layout of the proposed development is
consistent with the applicable elements of the City's
Ceneral Plan and any adopted arrhl.ectural criteria for
specialized area, such ae designat d historic districts,
theme rrcas, spec!£ le plans, commun'ty plan, boulevard,,
or planned developments
The dc•A gn and layout of the proposed development wtll
not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of
neighboring existing or future developments, and will not
rreaty traffic or pedestrian hazards
i The architectural design rf the proposed development 1s
ctmpatible with the eharu: ter of the surrounding nelRhborhood
and will maintain the harmonlons, orderly and attract Lva
development contrmplated y this Ordinanre and the General
® Plae of the City
/ 7
are In u,.e So. 89
lice
•
The design of the proposed development would prcvidc
a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting
public is well as its neighbors through good aesthetic
use of materials, texture and color that will remain
aesthetically appealing and will -etain a reasonably
adequate level of maintenance
SLCTia%' h: PROCEDURE
An applicart shall submit the appropriate application, as
required by the Zoning Ordinance, and application fee as
set by the City Council, and required materials ds specified
In the filing requirments set forth by the Director of
Commnity Development, to the Planning Divisinn on or before
the filing deadline Once sit application has been accepted, it
,dll be scheduled for tar first available Design Review Committee
meeting and the applicant will be notified of the time and
asaee of such meeting All plans and applicable materials
will be distributed to all members and support staff of the
DRC a week prior to the scheduled meeting.
The Design Review Committee shall m.er with the applicant
to review and discuss the proposed project and its conformiry
with this Ordinance. The DRC my fo: mutate re•omaendatto ^a
on the design of the project relative to the criteria Ilsted
in this Ordinance or other design cr terin or development
standards as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Such
recommendations shill be filed Ii the proj.ct file to become
final condmtions of approval In addition, the applicant
shall receiv, written rotice of such recommendations
If, after review by the DRL, the Committee feels that the
project needs substantial revision, the project revir may
be continued by the DRC to enable the applicant to Vase
approprtate changes and alterations The applicant shall
recetye written nocificatton of such decision and the date
when too DRC will meet again to review the project.
SICTIOA 7: APPEAL
A. Where a project application has been acted upon by the DRC,
thv applicant or env interested parson who is aggrieved by the
artion, m,• file an appeal to the Planning Ceamtssfon The
—p.wl •h,11 stnco wherein the ¢!tons of the DRC are not
,onststrnt nr In onformance with the provision% of this
Ordtnancr At n regularly s, n.a., ed Vertine. the Plannfog
Commtssk.,n acv mtrim, mod'ty r reverse t.se �ccorvendat tons of
the DRC Nctslons ,hy the Planing Commission are appealable to
the City Council using the ssm, procedures
•,rnl...m ee Co 89
i 1nV i
• CEfTi nN ¢: ENFORCCffUT
A No building permit, for the congtructlumf ba Issuedi until buildng
m�
or project described in this Ordinan,r. Y
the rieslgn Review Co:nittee has rcvtcved the prolg,t for
confnrnance with this Ordinance, design criteria and
development standards as adop_ed by the f.lty of Rancho CucamongA
B Further, prior to final inspection o• nfr•ipancy, the completed
prniect must bo inspected by the Plannlna Division for
compliance with the conditions of approval %o ocrupancv
permit shall be issued unless all elements are completed
acco ding to the approved plans if for any reason this
cannot be accomplished, a cash deposit shall be sui+mitted
by the developer :o ensure compliance
SECTION 9: RNIRO*N TAL REVIEW
Tile Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found, based on review of the
Initlnl Studv, that this project will not create a significant adverse
Impact of the en••Ironment and issues a Negative Declaration
SFCTluN 10: 'TIER LAWS, ORDERS AND ORDINANCES
Nnthlnc in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, alaul or abrogate
1n, her lows or ordinances pertaining or applicable :o the properties
. old .vs af'ected by this Ordinance, nor shall It be deemed to conflict
v,th ,nv state lava, orders or requirements affecting such properties or
rr " In the event that a conflict does ariq the more restrictive
.•ri.n mce shall apply
CTTO: 11,• SEt F.RABILITY
flu• Invaltdity of any word, gect.lon, clause, paragraph, nentenr„ psrt
or irt,vislons of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any
,th.•r .,art of the Ordinance which can be given affect without such
in, illd port or part•
hta ordinance 111-111 be fn full force and effect ..t 12:01 a m on the
^ r 1v ater Ira idoption.
1 +N 11: the ,layor hall sign thlr Ordinance and the flty C',rk
+11 i1' ittrg[ to the 1aa,• Ind the City !lark shall Gauge the alms to he
i',I..n••A vtthln it,,. (15) Inv. Otter ltg pasgag•• at loagt once In
111
it . Rg••rt, 1 n,•vspaper if general circulation publiehod in the
It, •t ontarlo, fnllfornil, ind circulat d in the city of Rant ho fummc lga,
� ii l.anl,
I'ASSFD, %PPROVFD, and ADOPTED this _dav of 1979.
AYES:
® B
ASFI
ABSENT:
7Layor
ATTEST: ^
City Clark (T,
9
E
NEm0
70• Council 6 City manager
FROM• Finance Directtr %%
SUBJECT Bingo Ordinance
and protect the citizens
Of rofessional bingo entrepreneurs a bingo
In an effort to try and stem the tide of b ngo.
from a possible Invasion o D approval and action
ordinance is presented for councils
thebasic requirementsdfnr9conductingfb bingo games. This ordinance nd
affirms torequire what the State declares are the rules for bingo and
tnat the City is aware also illegal gamess d
from taking place ie the City
necessary action to prevent
of Rancho Cucamonga
mdE cak
DO
ORDINANCE NO 50
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCWONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROYIDMG FOR THE ELIGIBILITY
OF AND REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE PLAYING OF BINGO
:ITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1104GA
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California,
foes ordain as follows:
SECTION I ORGANIZATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR CITY LICENSE TO CONDUCT BINGO GAMES
fa Bingo games ma;, be conducted only by organizations exempted
from the payment of the bank and corporation tax by Sections
E3701a, 23701b, 23701d, 2370le, 23701f, 2370lg and 237011
of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and by nobilehome park
associations, and senior citizens' organizations;
'b; and provided that the proceeds of such games are used only
for charitable purposes, prizes and operational costs;
(c) and provided further that a" inzat authorized to
conduct bingo games comply wi rovisions of this ordinance
and Section 326 5 of the penal Code
• 'ECT10% 2 DEFINITION
a) As used in this Ordinarce "Bingo" shall mean a game of chance
in which prizes are awarded on the basis of designated numbers
cr symbols on , card which conform to numbers or symbols
selected at random.
h) llobile home park associations shall mean those organizattons
that are formed by the residents of mobile home parks within
the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
�) Senior citizen orgainzations shall be those organizations
formed for the benefit of senior citizens living primarily
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga
,EC' `1 3 LICENSE REQUIRED
'lo ,Ohl• ornam zation •hall conduct a bingo gare _rless it has first
a. li�1 Inr and obtained a license fror the Cr ty of Rancho Cucamonga
pjrp,,,nt to the drovisinns .f [ha Ordinance
,E "' 111 1 APPLICA'104 FOR LICENSE
Any org.lnitation which is eligible under Section 1 of this orrHnance
ay annly 'n writing for a license to conduct bingo games to the office
® of licens ng official The issuing authority shall be the Finance
0n'nct it
1, !,'lance ho. 90
Pays ,
SECT .74 5 CONTEUTS OF APPLICATION
di Said application for license shall contain the following •
l The name and address Of the organization;
The address within the City at which the bingo games will
be conducted, and the occupancy capacity of such place;
T The legal names, residence addresses, home telephone
numbers, drivers, license numbers, and social security
numbers of the directors and officers;
4 The basis for eligibility
5 The date on which the organization was organized for the
purpose state: in the application, and the date On which
the organization actively beqan to pursue the purpose
tated in the application;
6 Tte proposed days of the week and hours of the day for
conduct of bingo games;
T The bank and account number of the account into which
P2VC-eds of the bingo game shall be deposited;
8 The none and address of the person who w111 be responsible
for keeping the books of the organization. ,
9. A statement that the applicant agrees to conduct bingo
games in strict accordance with the prOVi54or5 of Section
326 5 of the Penal Code and this ordinance as they may
be amended from time to time, and agrees that the license
to conduct bingo games may be revoked by the Finance
Director upon violation of any such provisions;
10. Any other information spC•ified by the Finance Director
which 1s reasonably required to complete the investigation
on any application;
11 The application shall be signed by the officers of the
applicant uncer penalty of perjury,
b, The license fee fixed by the City Council by resolution shall
accompany the application
' In addition to the foregoing inforation, the following
doc.,—ents shall be attached to the apPlication
I If the organization Is a corporation, certified copies
or It: Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws If the
organization is other than a corporation, certified
copies of its Bylaws,
0
�i
••n• mn• No. 90
rams
2 Certified copies of the 'Certificate of Tax Exempt
• Status" from the California Franchise Tax Board, except
for mobile home park afsociations Or senior citizens
organizations
ECt '7 G INVESTIGATION
The -Hance Director shall examine all app I Ica dons filed under Section
5 hernnr and shall make, or cause to be made. Such further investigation
Of -- application and the organization as he shall deem necessary in
order .o rerform his duties under this ordinance Upon request by the
iinance Director, the organization shall make available for inspection
by the Finance Director, or his authorized representative for such
purnnses, all of the Organizations books, records, and papers at any
reasonable tire before the license is granted, during the time a
license is granted, during the time a license is In effect, or after a
license has expired, Or after a license has been suspended or revoked
SEC_ 1'1 7 STANDARDS FOR GRANTING OR DENYING LICENSES
i) The Finance Director may issue the license provided for
in Section 5 hereof whenever he finds the following facts
to exist
I That all of the statements made in the application
are true,
That the organization is qualified under Section 1(a)
of this ordinance
1 No evident, that a director, officer or employee of the
organization has engaged in any fraudulent transaction
or enterprise,
a That the binyo games Shall ue controlled, supervised and
conducted only by a director, officer or employee of the
organization,
5 That the organization has consented to inspection of the
pre,ises where the binyo gamer shall be conductea, and the
books and banr accounts ,elating to the proceeds from
said bingo games
(b) The Finance Director may deny a license whenever he finds that
any one a ore of the facts in Subsection (a) of this se, tion do
-it ert t
SECTION 8 ^',TCN 1F LICE-IS[
rl Upon ,r•11 Satr,f ed that the aPPl11ant is fully eualified
and -r laa to conduct bingo cares in the City of Pancha Cucamonga,
the Finance D rector ,hall issue d license to Sa'1 applicant
.,hick shall centr n the followinq inror -ation
52
- Ird'nance No 90
PUae •1
1. The name and nature of the organization to wham the
license is issued. 40
2. The address where bingo games are authorized to be
conducted;
3 The occupancy capacity of the room in which bingo games
are to be conducted;
4. The date of the expiration of such license which shall
be December 31st of the year 't is issued;
S. Such other information as may be necessary or desirable
for the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter
m) Any organization holding a licer.se hereunder shall post it
In a prominent place at the location wherein it shall conduct
Its bingo games
(c) sy license issued under this ordinance shall not be transferred
and any attempted transfer snall void the license
SECTION 9 PROFITS TO BE KEPT IN SEPARATE iTUND OR ACCOUNT
nil �rmfl•s derived from a bingo game shall be kept in a separate
account ,7r fund and shall not be commingled with any other fund or
iccount The licensee shall keep full and accurate record of the income •
and n•-endltures received and disbursed in connection with its operation,
_onouet, nronotion, sucervision, and any other phase of bingo games
wni -h ire authorized by thi, ordinance All profits derived from a
7ir o ire shall he used only for the charitable purposes The City
of incho Cucamonga, by and through its authorized officers, shall
^ rvn •ne right to examine and audit such records at any reasonable Lime,
in; the licensee shall fully cooperate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga
ov aking such records available
EC T I„l 10 CONDUCT OF BINGO WIES
' rn ar(lanization holding a license under this ordinance shall conduct
Dinuo na.-ns in accordance with the following renuir..ents
'a) •la minor shall he allowed to narticirate in any bingo gamesi
-he licensee shall conduct binno names on property as listed
on the 1Qense an ^licat no fom;
r) All binno names shall be oven to the oi.biic, not ,lust to the
,e-bers of the licensee organization;
'q) A bingo same shalt be operated and staffed only by cambers of
the licensee organization No person shall receive or pay
a orofi wage or salary from any bingo game
_5
r.finulr• 10 90
,+,+i,
^ 'lo individual, corporation, partnership Or Other entity
a.cePt the licensee organization shall hold a financial
interest in the conduct of such binoo game,
` to Person who is obviously intoxicated shall be allowed to
participate in a bingo game, aW no alcoholic beverage shall
be allowed to be tonsured in the room in which the bingo
•iame is being conducted;
vl ',o person shall be allowed to participate in ,; bingo game,
unless a person is p'Iysically present at the time and place
at which the binoo game is being conducted;
The total value of prizes awarded during the conduct of any
b+neo game shall not exceed $250 00 in cash or kind, or both
for each separate game which is held
I) •lo licensee shall conduct bingo games more than two (2)
days per calendar week and more than six (6) hours out of
any twenty -four hour prriod llo bingo game shall be conducted
before 2.00 p.m. nor after 11 59 p.m of any day.
LC' ^'I 11 AT EIOARCE LIMITED TO OCCUPANCY CAPACITY
'lotw, - hstandlnc that :Ingo games ar_ Open to the public, attendance
It "I Ingo game shall be limited to the occupancy capacity of the
.n, - ahi�h such na,"e is conducted ,s determined by the Fire Department
Inn , 'l•nq Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance
At" ,nnl+rIhle laws and regulations Licensee shall not reserve seats
+r , rt+ for any person
`r" :'1 _2 BINGO 3A11ES C0fl000TED ONLY 01 LICERSEE'S PROPERTY
i t'�e•'.ee shall conduct a bingo game only on the property owned
`r '•rtM by It, and which property is used by such organization for any
If` ^^ qr for performance of the purposes for which the organization is
•-'+n+•ed The license issued under this chapter shall authorize the
'•n''•.. •h °reof to cnndurt bingo qa ^es only on such property, the address
Is stated in the apPlic -ion In the event the described
r r^r•d ceases t0 be used as an office or as a place for performance of
'he •,r-mses for which the licensee is organized, the license shall
^r n•+ however the license nay be obtained by an eligible organization,
,rrin C ?ration under this Oriinanfe, when it again Owns or leases
ern nnr•, ,sed by It fOr in office or for nerfnmrance of the purposes
br ,hi -I one organization is organized Only On^ license shall be
t,ued 'Or am location Or Probrrty
ECT SN 13 REPOR1111t, RE UIREIIENIS
is Ia) Each or ni za on hula inq a lice n under this Ordinance shall
file a I port, nn a for provided by the Finance
Dfrec to r, der lendar quarter
t1�
Irdi -once No 90
'agu u
;b) The reports required by this Section shall be filed with the •
Finance Director within ten (10) days of expiration of each
reporting period; and such reports shill contain the manes
and addresses of any new director or officer of the organizdtion
1c) Any license 1 ;sued under this Ordinance shall be suspended
for any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of
thi- Section; and notice thereof shall be given by registered
mail to the address shown on the organisation's application
md) Anv organization chose license has been suspended under
this Section shall cease to conduct any bingo games until
further notice from the Finance Director
,ECT:'.'1 14 LICENSE RENEWALS
At 1 "ast thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of any license
her "und ^r, the licensee .. rganization may apply to the License Official
for onowal of its license hereunder The application for renewal
:hill be nn a form provided by the License Offie'xl, and it shall
ie•^r,ine whether the Information provided on the original application
it %till true
'a) The Finance Director shall not renew a license if he finds
that any of the facts listed in Section hereof no longer
exists, or that the organization applying for renehal hereunder •
has failed to comply, in any respect, with the provisions
of this Ordinance
-E-1:1 IS REVOCATION OF LICENSES
Nhenerer it shall be shown Or whenever he Finance Director
has knowledge that any organization, or agent thereof, holding
a license under this Ordinance has violated any of the provisions
Of this Ordinance, the Finance Director shall immediately
suspend the license and give the organization written notice
by registered mail of the suspension and a brief statement
of the reasons therefor
(h) Upon receipt of ;aid "Notice of Suspension ", the organization
whose license has been suspended shall cease from conducting
any bingo game, and its failure to do so shall coc;titote
a separate and further violation of this Ordinance
(c) Together with the "Notice of Suspension" r quired by Subsection
(a) of this Section, the Finance Director shall invite the
organization whose license has been suspendei to participate
in a hearing to be held within fifteen (15) days of the date
of the suspension to show cause why the license should not
be permanently revoked At the hearing, the organization
whose license was suspended shall have the right to present
evidence as to the fares upon which the Finance Director
based his suspension of this license, and any other facts
which may aid the Finance Director in determining whether
re
I in,e NO 90
naan
• this Ordinance has been .lolated Within fifteen (15) days
after the hearing the Finance Director shall decide to
reinstate, conditionally reinstate, suspend or revoke the
license Said decision together with the reasons therefor
shall be in writing end shall be delivered to the organization
whose license has been suspended by registered rail
sE:T;n•l 16 APPEAL
u
" r "e -vent of any finding or decision of the Finance Director which
Is adverse to the application of an organization for a license or
renewal therof under this Ordinance, or if a license is suspended or
revoked, the organization may appeal to the City Council, provided,
t "it ;ach app"I is filed with the City Clerk within fifteen (15)
days f'" the date of the finding or decision of the Finance Director
' "e rinance Director shall notify an Orrani23tien of this right to
arr,•al, and such notice shall accompany each and every finding and
decision of the Finance Director which is adverse to any organization
ao l,inq for a license or renewal thereof under this Ordinance The
`indinn or decision and the notice of this right to appeal shall be
-ailed by registered mail, to the organization at the address which
aooears or its application for a license or renewal thereof
'a) At its first regular .rfeting after the filing of a notice
to appeal, the City Council shall set a hearing on said appeal
ror a date certain within the next thirty (30) days
,CC -. 1'1 17 "E1IALTIES AND REMEDIES
a) It is a misdemeanor for any person to receive or pay a profit,
wage or salary from any bingo game authorized by this Section
A violation of this Subsection shall be punished by a fine
not to exceed $10,000 which fine shall be deposited in the
general fund of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
b) Any other violation of this Ordinance by any person organization
or entity shall constitute a misdemeanor and may be punished
by a fine not to exceed 5500, or i- prisonment In the County
Jail, not to exceed six (6) month, or both
The City nay corrence on action in a court of coRPetent
)uri;d•ction to enjoin any violation of this Ordinance
t 1, rt , intention o' the Cltr Council that each orovision of this
"•rd inre shall "r di,Lren indnoende "t of all other provisions therein,
i" , rurther the intention of the City Council that if any provision
if n Ordinance is declared invilid, ail of the provisions hereof
.nil] remain valid and enforceable
i. 1-di9ance No. 90
vaae 1
SEC'I )'1 19. •
"W "iynr shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to
*no sa,=. and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within
fifteen '151 days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report.
nrespaper of general circulation publishc in the C1ty of Ontario,
California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamnga, California
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979
AYES
NOES -
ABSENT.
Mayor
AT'ES'
•
City Clerk
�t
a
,x, ✓ CJ
s�
ca
. 1
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYOXA
MEMORAAUDM
Date: October 17, 1979
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Jack Ian, Director of Comralnity Development
Subject: 7.ONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION NO 79 -04 - PETER POPOFF EVANGELISTIC
ASSOCIATION
ABSTRACT: Attached please fled:
1 Letter from Peter Popoff dated October 4, 1979 further defining
the site tange now, proposed
2 City Council Memorandum dated September 19, 1979
1. PlanninP, Comisaion Staff Report dated August 22, 1979
• This item has been continued by the City Council for various reasons, fire
for a full Council to be present; and second for additional time to consider
the applicant's request
RECQCYE.`,DATIOY_ It 1s reco ®ended that the City Council consider all the facts
of this request and determine:
1 The use is similar in nature
OR
2 The use is not similar In nature
to uses listed In the R -1 tone
I
Res;dee Lfulhy submitted,
_ACF. I.M. Director e4--
Ceamunity Development
J U BR7i: m
0
+ - `Petef-`Popoff `Evangelistic ccllssociatiott
9"'17
POST OFFICE BOX Bet UPLAND CALIFORNIA 91786
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Jack Lam, Planning Director
P. O. Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Lam:
October 4th, 1979
1.
CITY ()BRA 10I o. it DEPT...
COMN.0
0..1 u.: 1. ' ex
7 8191�1111d2117��3t�tgj6
tie must apologize that through an obvious lack of communications,
perhaps on our part, we did not convey the proper uses and
specifications of our church for on -site versus off -eite
ministries. This letter is to clarify more specifically wh,.t
our intended ministries both on-site (which is the main concern
for the property in question) and off -sito.
0
In our first phase we want to start with a 10,000 sq. ft. multi-
purpose building with sanctuary seating for 100 minimum and the
second phase church sanctuary seating capacity to be in excess of •
300
On -site ministries are to be:
1 Church services (Sunday)
2 Christian Ed. Sunday School
3. Bible Studios
4. Family :ouneeling Center
5. Outreach Ministries
6. Crisis Hot Line Center
7. Radio Recording and Tapoing Center
Off -site ministries will bet
I World Evangelism programs with Bible outreach officed in
Wureertal, W. Germany and a branch office in Vancouver,
R C., Canada
2. Printing for the Bibles and principle mailers are done in
Germany, Canada, (long Kong, and Homer Business Service of
Ontario, Ca
As point of clarification, the only printing to be done on -site is
church bull -tirs, short -run educational materials to be used for
Christian Education and form letters. We intend to use a small
tabletop A. B. Dick press (about the size of a Mimeo) and a short -
run paporplate maker.
i
'•
Page 2
To bring our church into proper perbpectiva, I would like to
project approximate square footage we will require for each
0- -site use:
1. Multi- purposo sanctuary - approx. 10,000 sq. ft.
2. Paste's oftice - approx 144 sq. ft.
3. Staff offices - 600 sq. ft.
4. Kitchen facilitiec - 300 sq. fL.
5. Outreach and course ing meeting rooms - approx. 500
sq ft.
6. %cording room - 140 sq. ft.
7. Mail, filing, and copying (printing) room - approx.
140 sq. ft. (max.)
0 Inspiration Garden with prayer and meditation center
(semi - enclosed)
I hope that this letter will clear up any misunderstandings as to
our intended on -sito church activities. I wish to state that we
do not intend our on -site church operation to become a major
printing operation. Our primary ministry will be local outreach,
building our church, serving the Rancho Cucamonga community.
tae respectfully hope that our church meets with your requirements
for the R -1 zone.
t.; \ ost gards,Y
WE
L OF F d:CI1D CUCAt10tCA
11MORANDC.
\9
Dates September K. 1979
To: City Council and City Hanger
Frain: Jack I.=, Director of Community Devolopment
Subject: ZON113C DETE111111ATI04 NO. 79 -04 - Peter Popoff Evangelistic
Association - Reanest for Determinalton as to whether or not
:he Peter Popoff gvangel lstie Aamclet l.0 use is alIviable in
the R -1, single family zone
nBS]RACf: As the Cftv Council will recall, thls from vas c. rtinued from
the September 5, 1979 City Ctwncil meeting to order that a full Council
would he present to review this dettrminatlon Since that it". Barmaklan-
Wolff and Assoctntes have submitted a letter with additional Intornation
regarding the Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association It is attached for
ynur Information Additionally, we have attached the previous Staff Report
for your consideration Our recorsecndatlon remains the same
RcePc'tfully auPfired
JACK LAII
Director of Community Development
Attachments: Bamiklan -Wolff letter
Planning Commission Staff Report dated 9/5179
Y
u
BAFMAKAN
VVM, FF AND
• ATSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE &
5,10RONMENTAL DESIGN CITY U RANCHO DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DCPT,
September 6, 1979 SEP 10 1979
AM I'm
71819110lllla 111213141516
Mr, Jack Lnm, Planning Director
City of Rancho Cucamonga
PlanninP, Department
9320 9ase,ine
Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701
re: Further information Regarding Peter Popoff Evangelistic Association
`,or City Council Appeal of Planning CPmmisslon Decision.
Dear Jack
nor firm is acting as spokesmen for the Evangelistic organization of Mr.
Popoff because of their relative Inexperience in dealing with City
• revernment and Its requirements regarding their site use.
2
Evidently, there In moss differnnee of opinion on the City's part, also
bcca,se of the staff's tri- recommendation, the Commission's decision and
the 1.0ancil's appeal. Because of this apparent division of thinking, f
.void like to ofrer same Input to hopefully clear up some preconceptions
or it least to offer data to make an objective decision on the part of
the Council possible.
When `Ir. Popoff approached our firm, we were aware that his organization
offered services somewhat unique In coeparison to typical community
religious services Because of this unique nppllcatlon (i.e. te.hnieal
cnmmuntcatlon And correspondence), be thought It wise to consul, with
the Planntng Department and be open and honest about the Associ n's
functions
If we hao approached the Planning Department with a typical chu,
enure Pt is sosto hsvP suggested, we could probahly he well into Cite
project with a nice ePrsaision and contract, but our firm's integrity -nd
our rappnrt with Rancho Cucdwjlpa mans too much to us, not to mention
the Possible trouble in the future if there was any mlaundorstanding
in regards to the evangelistic function of Mr. Popoff's Association.
59'C'STREET SU17E 201 UPI AND, CALIFORNIA 81786 • TELEPIICNE, (714) 965.1881
ANDREW BARMAMAN1Arctjte�ARRy WOLFF'ArcNtect
l
`,r. Jack Lae
Planning Department
pace 2
September b, 1979
The question put `orth to the Planning Commission (and which they
approved), was whether the proposed Evangelistic Center uses were
similar to those of a church. I think this question brings up four
basic issues I would like to address and have backed up with some amount
of research including the Dictionary, Telephone Book and the Ring James
Interpretation of the New Testament of the Bible.
The Issues are:
1. ithat 1s a church and its related uses?
2. Are these uses compaLlble with neighboring zones and usrs?
7 Uhat Impact would this project have on the surrounding
community and uses?
i, would approvinp tills Project be setting a negative precedent on
future -hurch or allowable zones uses?
ISSUR :1 To define "church" is very subjective and at best
individually different.
Tn some, church Deans a shell, a building or a temple. To others, We
a concept, an attitude or a state of mind.
WFBSTERS DICTIONARY defines church as "house of the Lord, belonging to
the Lord; a building set spact or consecrated to public worship,
especially for Christian worship; public worship, a religious
service... Christians, a group if worshippers, a particular sect", etc.
When n student nr Jesus answered a question correctly ,.r- erntng
Jesus's teaching, he replied that his correct understanding would
build his "church". In other words, "correct thinking" was Jesus's
church ".
The Ponoff organization's ma to thrust is in reaching or spreading the
teachings of Jesus as written in the New Testament of the Bible.
•
•
•
`Ir. lack Lam
Planning Departmett
pace l
September 6, 1979
nr1rinally, evangeltsttc teaching vas accomplished by the early students
or disciples and patriarchs by traveling from town to town and
preaching. Mural America had traveling ministers or preachers who would
meet at a community house or church to give their section.
when the founder of Christ.andom tRught, h, would teach from s hill or
plitf,rm or from a boat I,, a lake, wherever the acoustics would be
appropriate.
In •oday's age of computer technology, mass coainlcation through radio,
televlslon and telephone, the conventional "preacher', although still
traveling. has =do use of thin aavanced technology in communicating as
lesus probably would have if he had had the equipment.
Recluse the Popoff Evangelistic Association cakes use of computer
t` tvpewriters to answer and transmit letters to those destraus of needed
.tnsuvrs and help, mere quickly wet conventional typewritten oc
h mdwrltten replies, should not imp.y that his cork Is any leas
-' - vreinRful in cmmsunlcnting ideals, or more of an "office use'. Using
vl,len title machines to transmit their local services to other areas of
Y the country only enhnnces their local effort dnd makes them more valid
In in evangelistic sense. Most churches are flattered if their sere ices
cin have a further outreach.
a'
To have attendants answering phones on "crisis" but lines to local
rest.'ents doesn't make their organization loss, but more community
arten•ed to putting in to practice jesus's professed teaching, of
"loving your neighbor as yourself Dally on-tha- grounds counseling
also makes "church ideals- more practical.
Thwrc s na[ mut6 of an argumc 2 against the [hc aght tint these people
do form i church dnd perform "church wock- in tte literal definition.
This 1-ids to th_ potent la llv bigger Issues of compatabll icy with
surrounding zones and uses.
IS4UE:2 on the west in n high density (2 -atun) dptrtment complex; on
e the cant is anoth -r church complex (we designed) with the potential for
El
W ✓
'fr. lack Lam
Planning Department
pave 4
geptember 6, 1979
1 01, children day care facility. 600 -1000 worshippers, a Christ'an
ewuation temple: and whatever other functions could happen on tle large
nits. These penple feel it is right to make full use of thefr c urch
hnlldinffs 7 days a week. On the mouth is 19th Street, a potentially
busy thoroughfare with a housing development bucking up to Its south
side. lastly, to the north is a presently proposed state freeway.
P,la pro)p_t in no vav ran intrioge upon or be not compatLble with their
rrcacnt tot ! of 5 or 6 workers and their neighbors, with the
opLimittic outlook of increasing their scope over the next 10 years and
,Iriwlna th, needs of the community Into their religious ow•look, they at
+est feel .0 employees would be adequate. Can a dally influx of 10 cars
be comrnrel with 96 on the east and at least that meny an the west? Can
a one and nwo story complex of ultimately a 100000 s.t. -foot print'
spread out over 7 acres (305,000 s.t. - 1130th) be compared with a even
more d.nsn project of apartments on the vest and an allowed 36 toot high
(3 story) complex of buildings on the east, be considered incompatible?
•
I''9l'E:3 other than drawing 10 -+0 people from the community to carry on •
their dally ministry a,d having a higher than normal mail and telephone
u.e, there certalnly 1sn't any detrimental cottmunLty or environmental
Impact that this small group of people can same on Its neighbors or the
city In general.
In Inokinp though the phone book, (copies attached), several cnurches
have hot lines or dial- a-prayer oeritces. Some have counse Ling and one
has i radio broadcast. Host, if not all, are located In or close to
residential communities.
The church with the radio broadcast tapes their services live to the
nlnctoarp (as 4r Popoff Intends to do with video equipment). The church
ham n 3,On,l s.f. + office spsce and publishes their owe church magazine.
(enarre: Yrs. Davis - Office flinager of Claremont United Church of
Christ Congregational - Station KLIT 1220).
These other ccmmunttics (Upland, Claremon., Gnlno, romuna) seem to have
no com"tibiltty problems with these eiwrche, and their uses.
E
n X
e►
r, lack Lam
Planning Department
page 5
September 6, 1979
tSSt'E:i wto.d the city be setting a bad precaAent by approving this
protect? In other words, by approving Mr. Popoff's uniquz church
activity be allowing other allowable uses in certain areas and zones to
go to estremes which would not be compatible with surrounding areas?
'fait seems to he rather a -mute' point considering where we are on this
r,rttculat matter. R.nnrho Cucamonga has no appropriate screening
nr.,cess (�,re than •cost titles) where by a ptujrct is reviewed by a
arahle staff and director, approved by a comission and possibly
rhillenged by a council with the public interests in mind. Precedent or
nut, .11 projects are still reviewed with the city's future very much in
stght.
That this project is unique, there is no question; that it is a church
ngntn can be demonstrated by the result of its activity; that it is
compatible with its neighbors can be also predicted, If detrimental to
the ron^unity, no more thnn many other churches already in existence
:ith similar user and Activities.
Tho dectston to allow Yr. Popoff and his organization to make use of his
rrnnerty for their ministry is now in the hands of the City Council.
':apefully, the previous arguments presented shed some light on his
intent And the Impact it wt'i have to Rsnoho Cucamonga.
This office feats it is not a big or detrimental project for the
proposed site and is very much in line with the concept of church
activity.
Thank you and please convey these points to the City Councilmen.
Slnce''rQLt ,
'D s5's'1V
DA;F 1e54C
Architect
DL: r, j
cc: Peter Popoff
67
,en As Sho.. In The Wh. a Inlwmntlon Pages'
—(Cow d)
Churches-Baptist Southern
Churchei- Brethren
N •1
]( «.LBO BAPTIST (F9aH
�(Cont'd)
_.U]Hle
... 141,4310 lla
CLAW11 BAPTIST wDgN
BA MAIN IN CHRIST N"CH • 0
ern\
1 W9El CNAI[NWAC i0o1r5
ROe!• F[Yrr
i 7 W w Poo,
nNr
IMINRIMG Y]X
I
In Sw.Y
=F,w
w.]
f.. S.Y1.f •Y lew r.YLY
I.n rYwn rw. w.a.
LnW S.,.Y
C...+11w W .Yny. fw Af.l01t
Y'� UP1113
W'wwll.0
IWYr41.0 --.W 'JY. ..w r.T
In tM]IV
-
YV. Ca`Y
NCALII aII LLI UO'
L
.....YlUI(
Y WAt MIN
]Rr W](t(9LIFa rlSlef
PASTOR
tU w4rC. F.1 YY .....Ytl
"If
._. -SC)WI
FVn1C1 N IRS
AA 1.3.11
6.VI MAP
�A OlV101IrX4�
]
l'I'iPIp�1"w''.'m-
S
.
~"•:Y�•. j'J.yHwI4jVf F. WIYIW.JI "
rS
LI R A[- 0 11C1. 10 LVT A
[8IINO0
PwMT
.Y HY
n
ImL !.a•- Y
N ,u-1
"Sm..
I\
l A "'1w. Is !w
MFR O-a +Ua .1.
84IN&W.B
• h
•
a.1a01
K.
lY•SO.Lm.
n
N
\])RN
(VIwYlIVYrC.HYIL U
i LL
CVY WLAN PASTOR
.O..
,Yl
wIWY . r 4 n
r oa.
-
'� O_ • H • r
Y.MCeS
Mr.rin
3ihte N �y
...VIYM4
1
I.o
L
v'
YI UY
'.IOf Yr 1Y0
.am-;-
1•�nn
'AffU{R�
•iV ••ryeA
Inln
.bnY
•q
.•I �\rv'
Ku
Ys•
M,
„• :10
M, on
.YIAU) I
fee Will
"Pull
R)13,1
aeaf101.
'• 1
J111,
[1
' I
FS:� „II
0
Y
I/ob Lin•H,A sfF 9y
fYTURE PAR” IVA [IN
SNI1.1"11t
SVV l9
Ewa A nl] r ( V
aXV1 -
Y]pN
n'wl Churches - Buddhist • +�
wiwlt
MINA
Raman
1%wkr SITE 'A -OP.o NEres
IS ICY.YS Y wa0f /IfryR3US-
L.Y.In w11l..wYNtIY
I W V CI 415 .:[ 1[FICI1
[In0•C
A, W 1•p C[h`[
3T OPa SYCNLYCH:( VPLR�
.1 .I•.fC• [C] [n YK[E ••YIIV
"ISHIP la IS AY 6 P %1
SMCAY Sca.= i M MS'
AVRSERY CAPE ALL II.RVICES
I an.nu... naol
fill A1.11T 9.1.1-1. .1.9c".
YO N,nrn• won. a Yuu<
rar•ro Feln ntx r•Sm.
YI \15114 a NV1.
1.1 W aI. LY'
MA -WI
PASTOR
411.
";.flat
Yra.n
114 [MID BAPTIST w WH[aCN-
Lr. L\.YW IIWIW
YN•.Y4Iw S.wn I W
.-1nL 1 OF.1.ImY ..I ISrHn
IN f 4tV Y 0Y YI.ySt
.r. Y Ae•twI
SPOT Or CW DUVE chtivat "in
w —ll. L•JIV.f I....
IKlli. f 191'.. 1 ".
Y4 0 H Ce.I 4',4215
_ "CEere6e3 I!
Churches - Catholic, Roman
— (Cont'd) •I—
sr ANTNOIT S CAIYOLIOCNVIICN—
I WHEN PETER 6RENnNN. PASTOR
Y•LCLs SAY
SVNyrL 1 IeH LI1N.V
"111.0arf P as .Y
COV!SSE]NS @I'M 4L YI:SCS
CIORCI CITNCHC CNVACH
YASSIS "
Scup LL f H rY
fVFIU IH.L IPIOOw11.w AY r1
HOLY /
.5.1. T
•~~ rR-L H1e 1 i I
.
.
1, &.
ww.4n ] /YIY
bun Ill Y t s u M q }:p)
Cw.n'lla Y.Y0 01 H. 410
too Y rxu.Iq. .4t 12t
SYr1.f ]115115
al faro •' '
10•Y 1ta..V.
- II YIY.l7l01Y .
CCSIN., Yl VU
.n N C•wW. •. Yf. MtJCy
REV LAWR3NCR BATTLE PASTOR
A....r pYa.npwe
Rn YIy W.'j a i P.I.
y..1 I•P.
ALSYer
D•.I, KIf IF.•AYL..1 W.IIn
M. 3ww11
A1Y
4SVe]58 T.
7 PM
uoPYil:�lii..lr.: l.a YLVu
ILf, ens trt 11. 1 + +Y
Y0.141.f
9 ;
;0 JS I1 MA.ITJSbTjOPM
- �• -'w'VY
IW1M •r wV ••
1.111 c..w .. YYn YLttn
Churches- Charismatic.
1415,... Ch US-0rlt
,
445,Y15
P4YGIItAL(T CHRISTIAN CfRTIR7—�
CLAAEMIT
A....r pYa.npwe
Rn YIy W.'j a i P.I.
y..1 I•P.
ALSYer
Iff YC if
fYY AY.
M. 3ww11
12.13, 11114
Sw. to 04 II. I.sm
ILf, ens trt 11. 1 + +Y
Y0.141.f
rK RY t•W fYn
f 1e1 rIY
OlaO.n.Y ],II. l3le l.V
IW1M •r wV ••
S.IVU•1) Y. V
rl./. y ••
CwwuRrYluw,M
]n1V1.11 t.w.n4(tw U4)14
Churches- Christian
C...+11w W .Yny. fw Af.l01t
Y'� UP1113
CIl�rsfaR wt1G f113i_
SA17 DO so
SUNDAY ) )Oq )Oil TO AY
WI(NDAY MASS I b AU
CONFESSIONS SAT, S
UHI fNW U 1 . .. ..IY.I
ActverILw Here - 1CPaP51' •••'
• Y)w
..... Shcp.,
Work
" ::
Puy
133 QuCLes
Churches- Christian 1 Churches- Church Of Christ
YEILOW
Of Jesus
To B
— (Coni'd) — (Cont'd) I Christ Of Latter -Day c ]ttereatrllloYSNIr •-
Ip2TNNIIWTSCNaSTI].1CWAC CNUKNOI CNLISTOf Y]MTMIq Saints— (COnt'd) I STCAY SCk DOL 9 N:
"A Grgrrg Iw (YYnx [.axwnt L(fM. M. Of ICSUf CMUfY C/ SUNDA VIDR!HIP ID IS/
h :I•y sDnawY wH. u1.1 nen DU Saat3lme IMGVDLIA RECREATION. CE
UDlA9D G YlCh lna I LNA Yw. U1 nU (,r YrY l..,swe Can,ar$n An SV 61T
GrPa A!!aw I'•i 1•lw•WI aD nn amc«w NURSERY CAR! OURINO-$It
M(IIw tM(at4W I.111•rul.rw H1Ytl MIIr
Wb11I Mer 10 10 ,bit 51Y1 30 Ix p(W[•IlOr.4,• a4r 5111U Ict
L LYLHYOII It•1''
YpN WY.IIL}IV1]q CH( UN nrr 4IW a'Y][ tL4•II�x4nYaYNwyq I ]MY W1•W ....(R
"YA"T. SAI J}q r.YVa P«oYw vS
N NIHN NOUN St NYIUYC II IY 'H•Y•. a+ .. U(•KU IYYr r,tll t•H}YnrM \,Y 't'+•'{
Churches•Chvrch Of God ens nn IIxYAnV s,,
W..
lY4. trn PYm apatx.Yal1 fwnrY [aA4 w'
W "I-rD3 CWaW tIHYMat g1CYS L+1, (Y ,[WIC YI N4(YW IY
Yx nn1•Iwn .. g1+iN tNLICM C /LCDIDS fV•YILwY � ^,�� ::[T((
Itl r•+H.YCw Kl1•U i�•/'•
(•anICNx 1•Ir,y Ww IynYYw [YAa WIw LY
YO[TX TOM![NURLM Ct [NIIST� f.•In H1YI{DAY Y.•aw 1\n II41,IY Churches- Fovnquare�i
'A CHRISTIAN CHURCH- AV IY sw. ix •IY aMN rY unlcw elnW,nlah.
Gospel
D\Y MN]YU O CI (NDD n1a Y�YN. IW tYYtaUllwq, Gof el
WYNT MYNn
)+
,31.[ntl•1YRCt 'VT. /IRSTScn$QutIVIWnn Cr LL
. •rMpAYYrw f.L Y1[.
fM1wrry}Y YCY, .1L}11Y YY I„af IY.LYrW
IY tG •]1(M rY µr)L IY
tprY Lntl•Dlt,lt(l I
Churches- Church Of The , r]f
rpYI RM Yµ }YYA
WL}IYfIInY Wlnwr4� .11r•1 .trV L]I.IM} YARfIW w"I:4S
.u"111 Mn:NU:1 u. uw Ynwl t wDY Y1NO �•
nn..ln.ar cl RrvN tsY alsllnNE1>� Bible Covenant ^""•'•• •":ua •+•
CIIUe(] a,Y]0e [YI W.1rw1' wP,«
Y M NnvaoM•n P.I., c[tn, Nn6f rr LYnaiylPrCH YY (Lj'r_ W
' \Olpe Gr0W W1171Iti (N, ••I ,]ItY frY Ie wr =lv ql (H1 Ql [- O— SOVIISOUAIarylgd
n1A1,.Y'•0-I es.wa »IAIY.Y \'!N ta.n]1 Churches - Church Of The
ACT CNI ISTOC CN W CND -
-AN L.cCII ING E.HURCH-
Glfl•Oftae'S gf1nV
I V11u 1.V Ys •01Y(IYV
c \t \IV
Y/Y•ltw xY.x1
nY a�•Yn..
Hn.:nUrep ]pwCSt o-trY
UIH QY, I,cw L]1J1N
LnulcnJ2•lnnRlon-
� D;scipics Of Christ
a ,•� •a\ Y..W 1111
pl M 1N� Hn.en
N. N•wx(
•InYD.x..eY �Twm
Lra,D cnassiL� aucll --
CVn.I1. ".1 ALL 4l SI U.'r
UH, LInpI1r •J/ pL1rU
Churches•Chrislion &
'Brethren - -'---'�•'
c4...a IH Y.A.prxxr f..a..11
Missionary Alliance
Johnny
DHIA4ID
N Yom'•
Rp 3nnti1
rNIM
•I+ .I••el(''IYbI
n.116 1
IN
i�'(.'i
"AN
o. +a.n.f«n..
tlt rr
Churches - Christian
I Sr ., If 1Y Y
Reformed
VH IIrV 1.1�rY rl.rnlV
~µ'„
wii.Yiw'i
Ywvr 4lln.W YYSH
Ia 4Y aY••••++aa •IN
M
ANN,
(byu•IN.w((4na at.Y
1+ E 1, 4M Y Y W ,. M•1
1311nwn (w ((1V arHW
mot•^- ,••! —E
M•nw+
Churehes•Con re ational
B 9
roL�s]uat aNRCVe /KYeIA-
((La
Iux•u,.1..
] «WAw(YwvlPn. ��
(I4l
M(..Yw•nw I
In
In Chris[
fw«.. x.Yanp1Y
' #'
Churches•C'luistion Science
( IIY(VII, (•(nYl (cl«A
3M 1(1Y LYY1(AV YA(q
Iwr
IID..no.
wn
Chutches•Church Of Christ
:n[S CHURN er"a
'Brethren - -'---'�•'
c4...a IH Y.A.prxxr f..a..11
ACHUk
tj UPLAND 'ItUrCF'
Johnny
DHIA4ID
WYwr aDIY4Y+ S's,xisso
Rp 3nnti1
rNIM
Bunch Pastor
Churchas•Commun ilt
fwxfwlln u..1,.:W
Itif
LSIN IE•I
LLTa l0Y1 pNY1.Alil CYL9[M
WwG«•I aYrG1•�fr+1
Iwra, nYHIMN.
1rY
I Sr ., If 1Y Y
YM• Mr
VH IIrV 1.1�rY rl.rnlV
[•• %+ I" I.
+1, fnl.1 (I Y xw Mr
Ywvr 4lln.W YYSH
Ia 4Y aY••••++aa •IN
NURSE" uf[ ALL s[fvICFS
",
i Ynn +nt4A rwr .. to-1nl I
of f CYyx M we .. •. yY
1+ E 1, 4M Y Y W ,. M•1
doors
mot•^- ,••! —E
L1a wx. eY ns]In
Churehes•Con re ational
B 9
roL�s]uat aNRCVe /KYeIA-
.,nn {el rux
MMf Qi Y. W,(
Y I.I411..pY
nsKYi:ZUna{aGkaO
fs nslY rw unwa.
IN loI 1:
Y.wn('M OnM•Ibb
hes•Church Of God �✓
In
In Chris[
fw«.. x.Yanp1Y
' #'
tiltS4w ba WLU
V[ aNlp 01 Cal NO =$I
I Yf 7 cw,YA•ON tl1Y1a eENT:N S GISCELL. D D. MnYa YCL1Ta41 yIMItlt Yll
NYw afttlu
hurches•Church Of Jesus
Christ Of Latter -Day
Saints
Churches-Episcopal
wrc «. arp(IYP I.Y
NIL WII,W tl]11Y (1YIp Y« '
nl.}u : ""YE' ° "• Churches-Friend:
{Y qN1 nlMYnarin•r
In },N pY WI]H IIY•YSOaYYYl.wlrf al(V
MLYiI YY.�,�YwY (a•n }iir YYwllaY }"!�
it ]NI Ib1W Ml)rl] 'TI
M] (011 S (II$wit CIMMI
Churches- IndepY
.. tl•nst
R. OIA, leawro Rtcla Fundamental
Mr N(1 SUNDAY WDRSNIr t A4 a It AL
"I ]INS
.. "I'M YD tIK(CNtlf[N at
tll ]1N cYfISr1AN [D•KHION 1 W LS1r�M;1•W11
tlLlnr a]111YW "1 its Ilvlwl(w I_Z
O••IMY .Y• n4 nH W ]MUM.....:.
tll Ms 1n W1 111- 'US
'�n.ro WOldlq SH,CR IOAM M[RCFRT L MEWL
ow\SnrCIYw YI AYI HAAL ib,T $cbel9 (31
1R]IG.•I A.ti .. (]; un SNllRr[YeE
IuI.nRY .
1.�111,H r 41n11I
o-t ... ..
liyt
Y•Inte
ttlu I'M
Don't pose your
.NY, tlllul
doors at noon)
CAmnI
.1MSlq
Ufttnp only hail
VALW
4 ...... tla Il\
Y11 A.
of what you see or
IY M
dv 4
do V eke CIaS1r10
INN
{Nawl
' _...:.
doors
t4
your at ncan
11"1,
V, -_. "NT1
•
0
SI t1 rG�es —tl[sd
Jlutthes- Presbytclian, •1 f1-urchos- Sevonth -Day
United '« Adventist • •
'.••w rw t.: cw. ...... ..
nir sturltlartWl[cNVSC1r-
rar 0.110, ..,I no,
rn U.W. Y nwr w rf•Y
win. 1,+{{l to..
."W N M W
ptlnf .1.111"I OU -114 If" 111
Nun 1w...a ...I W 1a
1'Irwti:a. ♦s"�'e,f` wi:.i:•. wiii,
usurches•Reformed in
America
S.S. 1M fn. N•'n LI •I .0
?Iw {N N few A. M4C{I
{sr..n Seen{• 4•IY .. NMl {U
lNTN�l�ulUmTaltiCN N?•1tN
IVRI eYtFalt011On
Universalist -I
1. ws.4.v,1.:r::Y:u. {`•".. Isn:e
lurches- United Church Of
Christ •n••a {'rr.I.r:tl:
'N[L caNGlltellwRLL tIMC`-7
WW
1{..4 Y.4YJ�fl.•�
Methodist
1
t4taf ctic if !igili '
WE CARE ABOUT YOU
1w,.1• Ii N1Y
.MI MY,Y IIM 1J JI Irl{
)Ivmh.rw VaatN
a!Y YTe+{ Y YICI, YwYr
J,1"1
yV~.. (•Jl1 qPn, {wI,{,YiulY'U1n1{
ortK.INa.
{Yen..
YE.YII StnI•It•Y.0 r]YY,
{•laie`IYVMaYOn6•Y
Methodist
1
{M Cw M'w ilnYn
•T•
Il.n 14 W ..Nt -11ar
A tWK.a ppe [.CI N •Y
Ii I To
L�nYaaT Cai[o Y(:NinSr uURc"
Il,lt w{w .. Nt .IN
caaxlsn R {octal u1.4«
...,.. ..wan
v«Oas
twcalY art +u nrcrins ,
.JUIn urz r•uw umcu
411tH
!11 V .wY• el aw Q4Nri
INI M...IpFI wan
canu{r ontce ucrllonst
Church Of Jesus Christ
aluac4 aN.rww..r.. w»
Churches -Reli Io4s Science
9
10rutluu uxmo N[rllron r cMnar
R1Y•IN win M+a11tt
I4rYnM - •Nr.wll
tv.e.f flMC\ 10
f alT lrlil9 V[TIa013T CIMUI OF
A tWK.a ppe [.CI N •Y
Ii I To
sicl.I
^,MKII eCe\lal•f Q'm CiYr
A n t. PASTOR e
i•••W YI .A YS w
Cu•�t
1J 1. f AI{
L Y1.41.•.tl • a Y
•1]rw M {]• ]I n
NWN
Y Y r . M Was
104411 ..
en �. 1[.r Nt�IN3
naYisNSiN]nslarJSCNe>—
Churches- Reorga nised
{Wi
I n,ml,Yan+
Church Of Jesus Christ
cwGI..I.M.
w
3lioii
Of latter Day Saints
+f! 'i Ii aY
-
_ °° {,, °„1 r
e,.Y•,,.{wnlnn,.ae.M
..•uw •w+a n•wl rr4cwn
WY4. Lw.
L+,I Y...1.Y W.rrtlwllM
all {W ••oV ..Ni•NI
(yy }V1e9.•+M M)LN
YN Yr,•{M .... .. •L {Nl
..
c... t. ml-..A.. ro4coli
\r CORONA CUY COMPANY
Ylnlrr [.aV1nLLS
10\•+«.,JnY•... ,;,..
•• •
' f
Adve•tLSH veyaur
Sale tlmel
Praducls
I •tu
FUsd a dealer
and servket h the
,
1
In your m.gheorhood
YELLOW P +SES-
,1
Dy leoklrg N the' .
Get more new CuSlcTbrs
YELLOWPAGES
tutu at krm cost
, //.
_ — vEIIOLV PAGES• "Tells Where To
d Methodist Churches- Various ••
— (Cont'd) Dencm' notions
trunruunNeourelnwaer --i l.Yaw.,. c,.. su.m
Innn.a nexx;re »a n. -Y. ��nY.1nm•..cvayul.
l[MIS JlralannC� !?�1an
,asrst^Y-.
s°i:. i 1.:. °�{ sco • .��
cigarette Venti Tg Maddnn
s« {
V.nd4, Mn4n.. T,3
Gli:am Band Rad'n
"on
[NITa Wl1LLTlV Gleclr-
013 . 13
Nnln Wt { )i 44. Ti YwT
{Ir Miele• Ua{. ii
"U'S nWK wo SI..
M+Ito. M• {w..Y•
I
City Go.nnm{nl Office\',,
o-.....
,I�. t.l4.•vY .. .N2 tus
104411 ..
en �. 1[.r Nt�IN3
I
«ww
Clyar, Cigarotte £, Tc
�•ww•ww
Il r,�bMrM .. I Isii
00.. -:1
In a4t ne,, .NLn4 ` __ - -
„••.s..•_tl.,vl., • , Cigar, Cigarette &
Churches- Universol
Fellowship Of
Metropolitan Community
ni"SamV IfwartTaMWa
SIZ11 ARV 11 On AN
IV { 4r.Y., n «. wwN
l[MIS JlralannC� !?�1an
,asrst^Y-.
s°i:. i 1.:. °�{ sco • .��
cigarette Venti Tg Maddnn
s« {
V.nd4, Mn4n.. T,3
Gli:am Band Rad'n
Who makes It?
ardw 4.Ywrwtnn.n lt{ 4., IJ
Who selU it?
Sji1i�" •�_'i
Who g,u ay -'
City Go.nnm{nl Office\',,
YELLOW PAGES ten Ill
I. . d.p.N U.,.1 cNM1. W
ws t. I.,...4. -NM.,.-Ur
City & Regional Plant
Clay Products •• f; ('
FOR YOUR EVERY
See Also �d
RECREATIONPI NEED
Pottery -Oil • • -r'tC �'
u.u... �,
Iv..o n.c"•.wY,.o-o n.c.{
Poil<MWhWhde 1L Mfri�nl
•Nina" Cdn�,l� 1•p •.1
On nilr GVJJJNNIO
cents ::lw meWCIS,`;iaa,
Ii. •enw•,,... rii t.tlalufti•+ J
10.0 ne1"0 is low
Clean Room F lit as,,!
♦ noSNU Sw It star tae
c... t. ml-..A.. ro4coli
\r CORONA CUY COMPANY
Ylnlrr [.aV1nLLS
10\•+«.,JnY•... ,;,..
w uwua tANt
COCONA, aLL3011113401720
.NUM 714-737-5667
sIcvI t,, —Think Ph : j
jig
0 1
.'ss�(��•'��`(s(� /] '..{ {}1��tA�,`'y, ��,1 o'OL° y,1 .Yoh' �/+/
d•^ � v' Tni9 M�jOnvt•'•��{ � \ '
El
CITY Or RANCIIO CUCAYJNUA
I'MORANDUM
DA C: geptenber 5, 1979
TO City Council and City Manager
fP09+ Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
SVIIJEt: - T.II'M ORDINANCE DETERMIMaTIO, 79 -06 - Peter Popoff Evangelistic
Association - A request t0 dr,,elop . i 1van9olistic center on 7
aa&as of fart located on the northeast coiner of Ramona and 19th
S -rcotr in the R -1 single fe,rily zone
AD, rv.N ° The Planning Co.-raissior, at their last meeting, addressed this issue and
decl.l I b/ 1 7 to l vote that the propcsed use vas similar in nature to other uses
Ili Ulm -,-1 _oeu and therefore allowable This interpretation, therefore, would -
tlla, the sur-i&ttal of plans to develop the pr3Ierty in phases to accomplish the
b.ulJin7 ;•roil lm which the rapoff organization desires A member of the City
Council Lai ra.luested that this natter ho brought to the City Ca`sacil's attention
,o to a t: -oy might have the opportunity to examine the facts in the ca-.o and concur
or take the opposite view point of tie Planning Commission's Interpretation
The Zonr,g Ordinance presently allows the development of churches in
3-ti alto the arPloval of a location and Jevelorrcnt clan tsite approval)
'fit jet ill , tlm Zonlan OrdI anee allows the Plannln) Commission end Citl Counci.I
t1 !,toxin thaw uses that are similar in nature o the uses of lath v-tie, hence,
t° ' 1 •: iso -or -his request Normally, in the con ideratian of wharbor a a :e I•
"lilac to the uses listed in the zone, one takes those items that are similar
t. •uturro and make a Judgement as to whether or not the use irould be similar to that
use ll.tri Ili, Cocmllsslon, to this case, tried to do Just that Even though the
v..t•: t.is 1 to 1. Ile Jecormination of 'when a church is a church', was not really
-AJ1 whirr and is a difficult determinat Loq, at best We suggest that the real
1 11 ti thta ca,a 1i, "when .loos church business become a., activit/ taking on
1 oil.• .pill chat ctor of a& office or business use, such thtt is is two longor
z :r ltlylo w&t•t 5111.110 famil, residential uses' The 1'o)ot1 organization suggests
a it ar elaborato array of uses such as Radio Ministry, Couneiling Ministry,
'ttl,ttfwl Pibli,h&hq, rtmpubt•r Cpa[atio,ls, Print,n) Operations, Crises Canter, and
i I—) ctLi Stiff, Ow•r a IO yelr Aerial, of approx,nrtely 10 employees
It ti ,m)-nrtant to not the t,&gnlficancc Ofa Zoning Determination When the
Cara& ;ton utl 'Ouncil 111" a IdUltril,latlon that a use is similar to nature to a
u.,• illa,aulc M o -'0110 It ,n :ouragcs other similar uacs If the proposed use by
tb• ;''Siff ••rq ••123t1on 1'. aloe• 11 to he 1111lar L1 nature, this mould encourage
otl„•r ornoiz tuns to Jove L"• in the R -I tons• and'or oneourago existing churches
w •!, , -I tulle to exlnnd op," huts to lnrludc dose that the ropoff Organization
proi'oaus
7l
RFzn -y H:NDATICM: It is roco=ended that the City Council consider all of the facts
of this request and determinei
1) the use is similar in nature 40
OR
2) the use is not similar _+ nature
to uses )a-ted Iin the R -1 zone
Reap. lvely�suhmittod,
-- Jack liM. Director of
Cexiunity Development
JL:DKh:ee
Attachments: Letter from Peter Popoff
Location Hap
�r �y
`9
0
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIKIIW.A
STAFF REPORT
Date August 22. 1979
To: Panning Commission
From: Jack Ism, Director of Cmnunity Development
Subject: ZONUM ORDINANCE DETERHINITION NO. 79 -04 - PETER POPOrF
EVANTELISTIC ASSOCIATION - A request to develop an Evangelistic
Center on 7 acres of land located on the northeast corner of
Ramora and 19th Streets
eACEf 'Aul_'D: The Per.r Popoff Evangelistic Association is requesting
a deter=tnac ion by the Planning Cmmiss Lon to d- teroine if their pru-
pesal for an Evangelistic Center wuld be permitted in Vie R -1 (single
family residential zone) Attached is an outline of the ministries to
be provided at the center (Exhibit "A ") The sutiect property Is
located on the northeast corner of Ramna and 19th St,,.,,s (Exhibit "g ")
• The site is bounded on the south b1 19th Street (State highway 30), on
the nr rth by the proposed freeway, on the west by an approved apartment
devoloiment, and on the east by an approved church site
A'.,UysIS_ The Cruntt Zoning Ordinance presenrly lists churches as a
use that may be permitted if approved by the Planning Commission undo.
the Site Approval process The issue before the Plarning Commission
relative co this deteroinattcn, it whether the type of activities pro-
posed to occur within tl,e evangelittic center are sLollar in nature to
those of a church Host of the activities listed by the applicants
so= to be more aligned with offlcc type uses There are certainly Inci-
dental office use that occur wlthir a church fac' ;ty Rowever, at what
point does the office type uses become more of a yr Lnary use rather than
an assessory or Incidental use` T,plaally, churches contain a sanctuary
for weekly worship services, am, a fellowship hall aryl christtan education
buildings for Sunday school class a and mid -seek studio(, Churches are
generally designed to accommodate groups of ptvple for meeting purposes at
certain times during the week Incidental office use of the church generally
nnus,sts of an office for thu pastor, secretary, and lussibly an associate
pastor, depending or the size of the churen The number of employees for
a church faculty during the week usually :mounts to 2 -3 people
The description of the proposed acts -ities prottdcd by th- apptteant, out-
line he majority of the uses as some type of office use Only a mall
cape: is planned for use by staff IT appmrs as though the intent of
this ronter is not to develop a use whose ITimary funrtion Is to provide
I nert'ng Place similar to a church but :o provide more of an adminlstrat ive
center ddeh wind =ploy potentially 40 employers.
73 ITIN "Fu
Mere are three options available to the Planning Commission:
The Commission could fId that the proposed use is similar
to the activities of a church If this finding is made,
It does not mean that the proposed use is approved for this
site The approval for uea of the site mould be accomplished
through the sLcemsful completion of the Site Approval process
which would include a Public hearing and property over noti-
fication
2 The Cumission could find that the use is net similar to a
church or my other use listed In the R -1 zone.
3 The Planning Commission could, as a final option, find that
the use is not almllar to those uses listed in the R -1 zone
and then initiate a General Plan Amendment to change the area
to a mixed use category This would then permit the applicant
to apply for a zone change to A -P (Administrative - Professional)
which would allow the office uses proposed by the applicant.
The justff ication for such an amendment is rased upon the fact
that to the east is an already misting church, to the South
is 19th Street and further South homes which bac: up to 19th,
to the vest an approved apartment project and to the north the
proposed freeway or Highland Avenue. If the Commission consents
to this action, then the amendment could be added to the list •
for Septmbor. In addition, if this is the final decision, the
applicant should be made aware that the existing signs on the
site would have to be removed and that the uses proposed by the
applicant can not be conducted on the site until the zo,.e change
Is adopted and site plan review complet.!.
RECDDIENWATION: It 1s recommended that the Pluanlng CrMisslon review
all the above options and issue and direct staff to the action deed
appropr +ate by the Commission
Rrs pectfully Submitted.
aL
.LACK LA.11. Director of
Community Development
J L:1N: m
Attachments: Letter from Peter Popoff
Locat io,. Nap
7�
td Ft zL kck.t�
�' e %n�i ` �a�' wf' ��' z�cr�rerJvlib�ictl�adcciarfi��x �.
POST OFFICE BOX 601 UPLAND CALIFORNIA 81786
July 26, 1929
Ranch Cucamonga City Hall
9340 Baseline Road
Alta oma California
Attention, Planning Commission
Gentlemen,
In reference to securing a permit for construction of our
Proposed building, attached hereto is A summary of the ro-
gucstod information
I hope this will give you an overall view of our present
organization and our protections for the future. If I can
be of further aesietance, please let me know
lrtceraly,
/i
] /p
rotor /POpnff
rroeldant
PP:cb
L-1
75 I
Perot Popoff Evangelistic Association
Summary of Ministriest
Radio Ministry- -Taped radio broadcasts (from a Sating
small studio) mailed to 68 stations
Vilth Messenger Magarina-- publlshad monthly and printed
by locli printers
Counseling Ministry - -wo have employees who counsel by
mail and also by telephone
Computer Operations- -Our present computer s.xt.ss yiil
handle up to So times its P' resent capacity
Mall Department- -mall room .nich handles cassette tapes,
book• and othzi itorature.
Total numbar of Smployeos - -10
Additional M1= lstrios to be Included in Nww Building
Chapel - -a amall c)'apel is Planned where
services w111 be hold with thl staff
and visiting guest,
Printinq Pre,, - -A small printing prat: to
handle small printing project,
Educational Facilities
Crisis Center- expansion of exis.ing counseling
ministry with a telephone hot -lice with
A staff member on call 24 hre 4 diy,
Projected increase in surf- -over a 10 yr period,
ve expect to expand to approximately 4o
employees
u
76
SnhBr,-
vso'd�r
' I
v = tB
t
I tu
z:
d'lt"��H�2M
77
•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
TO: City Council 6 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hibbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PARKWAY MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
the Council at its September S. 1970, meeting authorized the approval of a
contract with Roy Jorgensen and Associates to prepare a maintenance manage-
' went study and recommend a maintenance program for the maintenance and re-
habii.tation of City parkways This report will be completed October 15,
d 1979 and will be delivered to the Council on that date.
p Project Manager, Clyde Burke, will present the program at the October 17,
1979 Council meeting The Engineering Division has worked closely with
the consultant and concurs with the approach being pursued at this time.
Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd 8 Hubbs
City Engineer
LBH:deb
LA
41
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 17, 1979
TO: City Council 6 City Manager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
At the July- 1979 meeting of the City Council, the preparation of Engineering
reports oo the formation of Landscape Maintenance Districts for tracts not yet
recorded and to various stages of construction was approved. Attached for
Council review and approval is the Engineer's report establishing assessments
for the subject tracts. The report Identifies 167,522 square feet of parkway
to be maintained at $.40 per square foot. Total estimated assessment is
$67,008.80. This cost spread over 704 lots will result in a per lot assessment-
of $95.18 per year
Attached for Council reference is the July 5, 1979 staff report.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt Resolutions approving the Engineer's Report and
intention to Form the District establishing November 7, 1979 as the date to
hear any protests
Respectfully submitted,
Lloyd 8. Hubbs
City Engineer
LSH:deb
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEIIORA14DLH
DATE: July S. 1979
TO: City Council b City tanager
FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
Bill Holley, Director of Community Services
SUBJECT LANDSCAPE WINTEXANCE DISTRICTS
Attached for Council review is preliminary Information developed for the
Proposed formrtion of Landscape Maintenance District No 1 and Lighting
District No 1. Attached are the list of the tracts to be included, Lhe
procedures for establishing the District under the landscape and Lighting
Act of 1972, preliminary cost data for maintenance of the District and
pertinent correspondence with the Planning Commission and Advisory Committees.
•
The tracts to be included in these Districts were chosen because they have
not yet left th, control of LNe developer and remain as one ownership This
fact will facilitate the formation process.
The attached mean on cost describes those methods of cost distribution •
througnout the District and gives samples of typical costs under each
option
This information was reviewed by the Citizen's Advisory Committees, who
recc ^ended a two phased approach The Committees were strongly in favor
of deieloping a parkway maintenance program, but felt that the program
Should be Citywide with approval of the taxing authority by ballot measuni.
Prior to this action, the combined maintenance district for the recommended
tracts was approved This is the Plan 2 option described in the attached
memp from Mr Holley.
The Planning Commission reviewed this proposal at its June 13, 1979 meeting
and reg,ested the additional information provided in the attached June 27
rewo The Commission shared the concern of the Advisory Committees and
s•,-ported a Citywide maintenance concept The Planning Commission will again
review this matter at its July 2 meeting and should have a recommendation for
Council at the time of the Council meeting
ISSUES AND ALTERIIATIVE
A great deal of concern has been voiced throughout the Cormunity on the state
of parkway maintenance To date, the City has not been in a position to pro-
vide any maintenance on either improved or unimproved parkway areas The City
Council through this years budget has committed substantial resources to teal
t with this problem. •
MAW
LANOSCME 11AIRMOCE DISTRICTS
July S.
page 2
nt In addition. Special
The cag^itude of this coenittment will have to be increased as the
additional
of maintained streetswill Involveemed�an islandllendscaping
Boulevard treatments
maintenance burdens maintenance
The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway
{ General Funds
2 Establishment of Iaintenance Districts through develrnpen
and annexation ide tax for maintenance of parkways -
Development of Lttyw
requires election
a Do not maintain landscaped parkways
been required of 411 tract
At the current time, a abolishment landscaping nts The proposed
develonr-en With the abolishment of Improvement Ze�Veements o be selft Lighting .
District tlo 1, no merns erowss the mechanism l {awl sovgrow and with other
District would replace these nrechanism and allow imp
support tio s As the will hopefully be attained.
It approach a Citywide Program
planning and matntenace experience has been
• It is the staff recommendation that the City
sucn time as sufficient P the general public and provide
developed to demonstrate the total benefit to the general public The pro-
until
posed program will allow for maintenance of required
a senanstrramo of the benefits of the maintenance and improvement of the
narkttay environment
p,ECC- NVIDATION {n proceedings districts
it is recommended that the City Council instruct staff to beg P These
for the formation of Landscape and Lighting District lit• and cost distributions
to encoMPass the tracts identified in the attached list wand cost distributions
on a per lot basis for for full district. for landscaping
on lot basis per
L
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
FORMATION PROCEDURES
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 •
1 Determination of Need for a District
The Community Developnent Department will determine the need for maintenance
districts on tentative tracts that have backup and side -on lots to the peri-
phery of the tract.
2. Notification of Property Owners
All effective property owners will be notified of the Council hearing and in-
tention to form the district.
3. Preoaration of the Resolution of Intention
The Department will prepare a Resolution of Intention for City Council
approval
J Preparation of District Map
The Engineering Division shall prepare a map showing the boundaries of the
C District, the lots to be assessed, and the relationship of the final tract
to the overall street pattern •
5 adoption of the Resolution of Intention
The City Council will adopt the Resolution of Intention, setting a time and
place for hearing rrotest against the District. The time and date for hear-
ing protest must rs set at least 10 days after the date of the Resolution of
Intention
6. Posting Notice of Improvement
The Engineering Division will prepare a Notice of Improvement. The Engineer-
ing Division will post this notice at intervals of not more than 300 feet
along all streets within the proposed district. (At least three notices must
be posted ) The posting must occur at least ten da,s prior to the time of
the hearing of protests.
7 Publication of Notice of Improvement
The City Clerk will publish the Notice of Improvement in the Ontario Daily
Report and will obtain proof of publication The notice must be published
once. .t least ten days prior to the time and date for hearing protest
8. :!ail Ina Notice r' improvement
The City Clerk will mail notices to all property owners within the District
L ten days prior to the date of hearing •
'6 [%
• 9 Cost Estimate K
The Community Services Department will make an estimate of costs for the
District, including maintenance, water, administration and vandalism.
10. Engineer's Report
The Engineering Division will prepare a report showing:
a. Plans and specifications of the maintenance
b. An estimate of the cost of maintenance (same as (a) above)
c. A diagram of the assessment district
d An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance
11 Protests
The City Clerk will receive protests and forward them to the Community
Development Department. The Department will prepare resolutions over-
ruling the written protests.
12 Resolution Ordering the Formation
The C rmnity Development Department will prepare a resolution ordering
the formation of the District. A report discussing the District and pro-
test will be prepared at this time
• 13 Anenda for Hearino Protest
The City Clerk will prepare an agenda for all protests received and will
note on the agenda that protests may be received up to the hour of the
meeting and that those protests received after the preparation of the
agenda shall be heard in the order of submission.
14 Hearing and Protests
The City Council will hold a hearing of objections. The hearing will pro-
ceed in accordance with the agenda
15 Filino the Resolution
The City Clerk will file a certified -opy of the resolution ordering forma-
tion of the Iaintenance District in th, office of the County Assessor
16. Tax Rate
The tax rate shall be determined by the Department of Finance
17 Adoption of Tax Rate
The City Council will adopt a budget and tax rate for the Maintenance District.
13 Sut.-irssion of Tax Pate L
The Finance D- rartment will submit tax rate to the County Tax Collector no
later than August 15 of the budget year. The Tax Collector prefers the tax
rate to be submitted in July. 1
STREET LENGTH SQUARE FEET
Tract 9351 - Hark III Haas, Inc. Sapphire 565 x IOy 5,933
63 Lots 2950 Redhill Avenue
Li
673 x 5
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
1307 x 13y
Tract 9225 - , -!ny Development Company
1379 x lly
69 Lots
' ,outh Fairfax Avenue
Carneliar
72- x 131,-
Los algeles, CA 90036
810 x lay
Tract 9306
- Halton Construction Corporation
Archibald
48 Lots
511 Hest Citrus Edge
P. 0. Box 775
Glendora, CA 91740
Tract 9269
- Mark IiI Homes, Inc.
Nilson
53 Lots
2950 Redhill Avenue
Archibald
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tract 9268
- hark III Hmes, Inc.
Archibald
53 Lots
2950 Redhill Avenue
Amethyst
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tract 9267
- Mark II Homes, inc.
Archibald
28 Lots
2950 Redhill Avenue
C.sta Mesa, CA 92626
C Tract 9444
- Mark III Homes, Inc.
20 Lots
2950 Redhill Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tract 9445
- Mark III Homes, Inc.
Archibald
61 Lots
2950 Redhill Avenue
Nilson
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tract 9440 -
Chevron Construction
Hermms4
45 Lots
2120 Wilshire Boulevard
Santa Ibnica, CA 90403
Tact 9423 -
Coral Investrtnt, Inc
23 Lots
540 South Pasadena Avenue
Glendora. CA 91740
Li
673 x 5
3,365
1307 x 13y
17,645
1379 x lly
151859
971 x 13y
13,109
72- x 131,-
9,734
810 x lay
0,505
826 x 13y
11,151
2140 x 12
25,680
665 x 10
6,650
1133 x 10
11,360
Tract 9434 - Chevron Construction 19th Street 603 v
32 Lots 2120 Wilshire Boulevard
Sarta Monica, CA 90403
Tract 9430 - R I. Sewers b Sans, Inc Iillsan 1160 x it
29 Lots 6481 Orangethorye Avenue, Suite 8 Haven 617 x 10
Buena Park, CA 90620
T
3,015
12,760
4,420
r 1
LJ
n
lJ
STREET
LENGTH
SQUARE FEET
Tract 9436
- Chevron Construction
Ilalnut
733 x
10
7,330
`
27 Lots
2120 Wilshire Boulevard
Itonica, CA 90403
Haven
442 x
10
4,420
Santa
Tract 9a:7
- Chevron Construction
Walnut
1310 x
10
13,100
23 Lots
2120 Wilshire Boulevard
Santa Monica. CA 90403
Tract 9454
- Lewis Homes of California
Haven
514 x
12
6,165
59 Lots
1156 North Mountain Avenue
P 0. Box 670
Upland, CA 91786
Tract 9387
- The Jones Company
Hemosa
110 x
5
550
56 Lots
10945 South Street
P 0. Box 1178
Cerritos, CA 90701
Tract 9637
- Chevron Construction
31 Lots
2120 Wilshire Boulevard
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Tract 9638
- Chevron Construction
Archibald
827 x
5
4,175
25 Lots
21' Wilshire Boulevard
Sant tanica, CA 90403
Tract 9567 -
Travis L tanning
Hermosa
494 x
10
4,940
•
33 Lots
2110 Hacienda Boulevard
Hacienda Heights, CA 91745
Tract 9402 -
Olympus Pacific Corporation
Lemon
977 x
5y
5,374
46 Lots
2110 East Katella Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92803
Tract 9403 -
Olympus Pacific Corprration
43 Lots
2110 East Katella Avenue
Anaheim, CA 92803
Tract 94SO -
Kaufman E Broad Homes, inc.
Baseline
430 x
15
6,450
54 Lots
18902 Bardeen Hay
Irvine, CA 92715
Tract 9472 -
Boulevard Developme ^t
19th Street
528 x
6
3,167
60 Lots
778 South Hain Streei. Suite 106
Orange. CA 92688
M E H 0 R A N D U H
( Dace Nay 11, 1979
•
To Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer
From Bill Holley, Director, Community Services
Subject Landscape Maintenance District No 1
Find attached cost information, based on current City of Ontario
figures, relating to landscape maintenance districts
District operations cost
Per square oot, per year
a) hater. .. $0 040
b) Vandalism and repair 0 015
c) Equipment . . . . . . 0 028
d) Labor 0.280
2) Other
a) Eleccrical,per meter, per year 39 60
b) Inspections, per tract, per year . . . 168 00
.1cthods o_f assesain coat
'fire arc tree as a ways or funding a Haintenance Distric -,
C such as we propose:
1) Each tract is a district;
•
2) All tracts are part of the same district; and
3) The whole City is the district
An examination of the assessment levied against each homeowner
using "plan 1" in sample tracts 9351, 9269, and 9331, and using
the projected test figures above, yields the following:
9351 per home, per year $37 48*
9269 per hone, per year . . . . . . 202.32*
9387 per home, per year 13 54*
Using "plan 2" the homeowner in Maintenance District No 1
would share equally the cost of maintaining the entire district
11ith the 25 tracts in No 1, cost to each residence would be
$75 37 per year
Plan three, while the correct solution (I continue to hold the
minority view) is not politically feasible, and further
exploration into it will not be made at this time
'Vic cost assumes that only or.e electrical meter per tract
is used, and this is not ge„erally the case in larger develop-
•
cents.
J
Lloyd, We obviously have a serious andefinanciallytout Of
ch
. chaequcstlon inoseveralninstancec using "plan 1" We are going
to have to address cost reduction methods through "hardscaping an
zone existing areas, •itilizing beautification foss, and bettor
g
control of "financially excessive greenery" imp P
requirements We must move quickly on this and get a policy set
' BH n.
cc: Lauren Wasserman
0
11
11%
X1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE June 21, 1979
TO: Planning Commission
FROA: Lloyd Hibbs, City Engineer
Bill Holley, Director of Community Services
SUBJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS
At it's June 13, 1979 meeting, the Planning Commission reviem d the
establishment of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 to include new
tracts currently in various stages of construction or review. These
tracts previously agreed to the establishment and maintenance of park-
ways as a condition of approval
At this meeting, the Commissioners inoicated that they would like further
' information On the following issues:
1 Cost of maintenance of all parkways Citywide on a per lot basis
2 Uses for beautification funds versus maintenance district funds •
r, 3 Methods available for annexation to the District
L
CITY'11DE MAINTENANCE
The staff is not able at this time to precisely define the overall maintenace
cost for a Citywide program because of the uncertainty of parkway development
parkway development standards and the lack of a -omplete inventory ,. :he
parkways to be maintained. The staff 1s currently working on standar- 'or
parkway development making use of more extensive hardscape elements to reduce
planting and maintenance costs, it is expected that maintenance costs under
the reviSLd standards will be much lower than the historical costs developed
to date Utilizing the current infcrmation and with a brief inventory of
remaining parkways, it is estimated that per lot charges Citywide would range
from SSO to $60 per lot per year This is a slight reduction over the limited
program proposed under Landscape District No 1
OEAUTiF1CATION FUNDS
Parkways within the Lity fall into three categories:
1 improved parkways adjacent to existing tracts - not maintained
2 Parkways abutting undeveloped land - to be developed
3 Undeveloped parkways adjacent to existing tracts.
T`r/ I1TM "J„
�V
`J
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OIS'RICTS
• June 27. 1979
Page 2
Beautification fees were developed to provide a funding source for the
development of category 3, undeveloped parkways adjacent to existing
tracts, and for development of special boulevards These funds were
not intended to cover maintenance cost. The Beautification fees are
not a predictable source of revenue and defend on the level of resi-
dential development within the City, because they will vary from year
to year they will be used exclusively for construction.
MAL'ITENANCE FUNDING
No funds currently exist for the maintenance of parkway improvements and
many improved parkways are currently being lost because of lack of care
Ulthout development of future sources of revenue for maintenance, future
tract improvements will also be lost
ANNEXATION TO DISTRICT
C
Included within the June 13, 1979 Cour-il packet, was a detailed procedcre
for the establishment of Landscape and Lighting Districts This is the
sane procedure to be used in annexation to the Malitenance District It
Is the intention of the s'aff to aggressively pursue District Annexations
• when Landscape District 7:c 1 has been completed. Approval of these an C
i,exations will be difficult to obtain where the majority of the re31d<nts
object to the District formation
•
ALTrDNATIVES
The City has four alternatives for funding of parkway maintenance:
Maintained from general funds.
Establishment of Maintenance Districts through phased development
and anneyatlon
Development of Citywide tax for maintenance of parkways - requires
election
Do not maintain landscaped parkways
Parkway maintenance cost will expand as development continues making funding
with grneral funds impossible without sacrifice of other City services
Establishment of a Citywide tax should be pursued through election as soon
as the parkway beautification program has been established
As a Incremental step at implementing Cit;nvide maintenance district, Alter-
native 2 should be impl:mented to prevent loss of current capital investments
If none of the above are dorm Iished, parkways in the City will not be
maintained
67
L
C
OR
L940SCAPE MAINTENANCE: DISTRICTS
June 27, 1979
Page 2
CONCLUSION
It Is recommendeO that the City establish Landscape and Lighting DIstrictc
as proposed for he following reasons:
1. Without funds to maintain existing and planned landscaping, the
current investment will be lost.
2 The established district will supply a living mndel of the Ma.n-
tenance District program to encourage other areas of the City to
join
7 The Districts will allow experimentation to establish precise
maintenance cost and to develop cost effective maintenance
Programs.
REW- WENDATION
That the Planninc Commission recommend the establishment o` Landscape and
Lighting District No. 1 as one encompassing district with costs distributed
on a per tot basis.
G /
n
u
r1
lJ
P .o i ..an,ssion Minutes
Jme 17. 1979
1E'n3T 7EC.,,7DI ::G LAIDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
711. Holley. Director of Co=unity Services, reviewed the staff report in
detail, 'his being on file in the Planning Division. Staff recommends that
the Caaisllan recommend the establishment of landscape Maintenance Listrict
::a 1 as one encompassing district with cost distributed on a per lot basis.
Co nLzsionrr Tolstoy asked how the fees are net for landscape maintenance dis-
tracts.
City Attorney indicated each y,ar the City Council holds a public hearitg to set
:he fees and anyone objecting to the fees has the right to protest
Ca�miasloner Carcia stated the concept of landscape maintenance districts Is
pro,resatvo foe the City What he would like to aee is the development of a
plan that would ultimately include the entire city wdtnin a landscape main-
tenance district. Ce would like to see the city broken down into zones and
each --one have a district.
Chair r Re^.ei stated he sees ;otentlal problems with this proposal as it stands:
It is tis opinion that alternaciver should be mentior,ed such as 1) a vote of the
people within the city, 2) ways of annexation, 1) ways of deannexation.
!it - 1olley stated staff is asking for Commission recommendati.n for the establish-
• ^ont of a landscape % aintenance district This 1s the first step and the City can
bui1.1 feom there. The City also shares the same concern with the establishment of
a itrcet lighting district Staff would like to know If the Commission supports this
evncept to b,ild from as a first step
Ca�icsioner Tolstoy indicated this is a step in the t'oht direction for the
Clc/
Chairman ieopel stated that it should be made clear which streets will be main -
tainea under the district to avoid confusion.
CaSllssioncr Carcia stated he supports the concept of parkway maintenance
However !archer study is nea•ded as to what the program is actually golnR to
entail 1!e would also like to know the parameters and bet .aries of the plan
and whether or not the entire City viU eventually be included
llr Lc, indicated the boundary for the landscape maintenance district Is the
current city limits Areas of the City are not proposed at this time to be
acctlancd off Any tract that wants to be included in the district can do so.
Staff needs to know whether or not the Commission and Council support this
concept before the details of the program are developed
Chalrnan icmpel stated alterritive types of fundings needs further examination
to reflect an estimated future tact'. far the entire city
A Xotton was made by Commissioner Jones and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to
approve the concept of a landscape maintenance district and a street lighting
dlatrict with a more detailed report to come back to the Commission for review
In the near future.
AYES: JON-ES, TCLSTOY, CARCU, RE`D'EL ^
f:0ES: NONE
ABSENT: IML
9 IESOLUTION NO. 79-SO
A RESOLUTION OF rHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAYO:;CA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LA%DSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NURBER I
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
that:
611EREAS, on the 5th of Jul,,,. 1979, said City Council directed
rue tit Engineer to make and fi'a with the City rlerk of said City a
report in writing as required by thL Landscaping and Lighting Ace of
197.,
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has code and filed with the City
Clerk of .cad City a report in writing as called for under pursuant to
.al.. h t, which report has been presented to thta Council for conslderatfoti;
VHEREA said Cotou.11 has duly considered said repr uhd each
v,•ry part Itereof, and finds that each and every part at Id
.,,1 i. .utti,tvit, and that said report, nor any part thvr,or, requires
r ,h... hd Se mndlrted in any respect;
"(v7. THEREFORE, it Is ordered as follow-,:
I That the Englrter's Esttmte or the ltentred cost, and
n ,% ,t said uvrk and of the Incidental expenses in c,nnectlau
••,•11111 ,, cooralncl In said report be, and each of them are herebv,
r ,i +tn viiv approved and confirmed
That the diagram sboving the Assessment District referred
t., and le,cribed In said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of
oul within said ,assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved
,no ant armed
1 Th rt the propooed assessment upon the subdivisions of
l w In .ald Asa, -smear District in proportion to the estimated benefit
t r,celv,•d b% saf•1 subdivision, respectively, areas said work and of
t „ ,, adental ex a•nses thereof, as contained In sold report is hereby
.n•Iminarlh app"•sved and confirmed
Th.,t Bald report stall stand as the City Cngineer's
Reattrr I.. +•t•e lurpoges of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to
t,- nnq,uaed dlotrlrt
PASSED, %PPROVF.D, and ADOPTED thla__ d.tv uf 1979
® AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Yayot
ATTEST: 1. ^� 7
City Clark ! Off.
I
•
a
ZI
RESOLUTION NO 79-8'
t RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO1°NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40
CUCAHONCA, CALIFOR.YIA, DECLIRLNG ITS 11TE1TI01 TO ORDER
THE FORMATION OF LAYDSCAPF. ,1AINTENA`tCF DISTRICT NO 1;
PI RSL'AST TO THE IANDSCAPINr \ND LICHTING ACT OF 1972; A[)
OFFERING A TIME L'ID PLACE FOR HEARING. OBJFrTIO"S THERFTO
The City Council of the City if Ran :ho Cucamonga, pursuant
to the rovt »tons of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being
Divl.ion 15 or the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
d•,. r sc Ive as f I lows:
1-- r rt •n or Work
i ECTION 1: Th..t the public interest and nveniente require
nid s the intenricn of this Clty Connell to fom a maintenance
t� t In the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the mainterance and
r s ,f th"s.• rar :ways and facilities thereor dedicated for
reenbelt pt riose, by deed or recorded subdivision tract nap
11''•It boundaries of the proposed maintenance district descriued
t n ' hereof Said rtatntenam a and operation includes the cost
,,l r iilor nt any sprinkler syst.m, trees, µnos, plantings,
rn„ anae.•ntal llgrtivg, strue,,tre , walls, in connection
F parkways
v •t Work
:LCTIaN ! The foregoing described work is to he l,natd
•
"W"', right -"f -way and landscaping casements enu „•rat,•d in
I ,.•rt r. th, City Englncer and more particularly described on
-u.. .. ire .• fi ;e ,a the City's Clerk'p Otflce, entitled "Assessment
Ji,:r tr I mJsc it walntenance District No I ”
it nrtlon of Assessment District
SECTION 1: That the contemplated work !n the opinion
tit City rouncil, s of more than local or ardlnary public he•netit,
n t. ..old City tomnra h••rcbv males the expense of the said work
or ,•ihie upon a district, •filch said district is assessed to pav
H. e t and expenses thereof, and whlcl• district Is describvil is
All that ertrin territory of the City of rancho Cucamonga
r•u Lti I within the exteriar l.oundary IInes shown upon that cc, rate
°'q. Linda iv ttiintc nan•e District No 1," heretofore approved
•w r ., t ity Lo.nc I of said City by Resolution No 79 -R0, indicating
'nu h „undary line thr extent of th.• orritery in, uded vitllln
. .•rup.,sed assessment district anu which rap is on file In she
'ii i , ,f the Clto Clerk of mid City
13
1, 1, lnt Ian No 79 -81
ric, _
Reference is hereby made to said map for further, full and •
oore ,articular description of said assessment district, and the said
11p 1 on :tie shall goeern for all details as to the ',tent of said
t11ra mcnt district
Report .,f Engineer
SECTION G: The City Council of sale City by Resolution
'9 -60 'us eypt uveu cnu report of the Cltv Engineer which report
Ind lr arcs the ,amount of the proposed assessment, the district bound.,cy,
a.aclsnent zones, and the method of assessment The report titled
"rn411ecr's Report, Landscape Maintenance Dlstriet :n I" is on file
11 otflse of the City Clerk of said City Reference to said
report !s herubv, made for all particulars for the amount and extent
.n the assessments and for the extent of the work
Collection of Assessments
SECTION 5: The assessment shall be colt Tcted at the same
time and in _he s[me mower as County taxes are collected The City
Engineer %hall Elie a report annually with the City Council of said City
Ind ,aid Council will annually conduct a hearing upon said report at
their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments for the
hens I,cal year will be determined
iii• tnd Place of Rearing
•
SECTION 6: Notice is hereby given that on the 7th day
.n.nber, 1979 at the hour of 7:00 p m In the City Council Chambers
It 71-11 Carrolton, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persona
','vine my objections tc the wers or xtenc of the assessment district,
„v Ippear and allow cause why said work should not as done or carrlel
out or why said district should not be formed in accordance with
th11 Resolution of Intention Protests must be In wr!ting and cost
cont,ln t description of the property to which each slena• thereof is
Interested, sufficient to Identify the sane, and must be delivered to
the Iitv Clerk of Raid City prior to the time set for the Hearing, ,Ind
no -+thtr protests or objections will be conaldeted if the signer
•t my protest Is nut shown upon the last equalized assessment --il
Sin Bernardlno County as the awnor of the property described in
the ,- 'Celts, then such protest must contain or be ac,ompanled by
vrttten evidence that such signer is the owner of the property go
4rscrthed
Andyar,ln: and Ltehtlne Act of 1972
SECTION 7: ,ill the work here'n proposed 111111 be doe' end
.tried through in pursuance of an act of the lextslature of the State
, ,lltornla dellgnated the Wndsraptu,t and LighttnS Act of 1972,
`. I'c Olvislon 15 of the Strom is nnd Illghvayv Code of Cho State of California.
N cxa lut ,an So. 79 -81
Pine t
APubli_ tion of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 8: Published notice shall be made pursuant to
Sr. tion •.961 of the Government Code The favor shall sign this Resolution
.,nd ui. City Clerk shall attest to the name, and the City Clerk shall
..aux.- tic xamo to be published 10 days before the date set for the
hvarina, at least once in The Daily Report, a nevspaper of general
ctr4-ol,tlon published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated
In El., Clty of Rancho Cucamonga, California
ATTEST:
u
E
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEYT:
t, Clerk
Mayor
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUU40130A
MEIORANDUM
Date: October 17, 1979
To% City Manager and City Council
From: k lam. Director of Coamunity Devolopment
Subject: L -.a CREEK PARR TAR CREDIT - A request for park tax credit
for Tract 9582 -1
Attached is a letter from William Grigsby of the Deer Creek Company requesting
partial refund of the park tax that was paid for Tract 9582 -1. Ordinance No. 8
(attached for your review) established the park and recreation tax for new
residential developments. The Ordinance also provides for partial credit of
the tax if the criteria listed In Section 7 of Ordinance 8 are net
The Planning Commission. at its meeting of September 26, 1979, reviewed
this request for compliance with Ordinance We 8. As the nrdlnance is
presently written, the Commission found that the development meet* the
• criteria to qualify for a partial refund Minutes of that discussion are
attached for your review.
D,e•re was some discussion as to whether or not It was the intent of the Ordi-
nance to permit partial refund for equestrian trails Since the Ordinance is
not gpeeific, the Commission unanimously voted to recomend that a 202 refund
be viven to Deer Creek. In addition, the Commission recommended that the Ordi-
nance be studied and the Intent clarified
RECDYgENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that a partial refund of
20: be granted to Deer Creek In addition, the Commission recommends that the
Coen.il direct staff to restudy and clarify, the intent of Ordinance No 8
Respectfully ubndtted,
JArector o
Coccunity Dcvelopmmt
J L: 7N: nm
Attaclments: Letter from Deer Crank
Ordinance No 8
Minutes of September 26, 1979
L O
I
01 .
July 6, 1979
P.ononble City Council
City of Rancho Cucamonga
9320 Baseline Road
Cucamonga, California 91733
Re: Ordinance IS - Park Tax Credit,
Deer Creek.
Centlemen:
Thin letter is submitted an a request for a Tax Credit in accordance
with Section 7 of your Ordinance go. 8 and the following materials an
submitted to assist you and your staff in evaluating the request:
a. Copy of landscaping plans for Tract 9582 -1. •
b. Copy of overall tentative map.
c. Copy of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions for the
improvement and develolvent of the Deer Creek Project.
d. Copy of the Dy -Laws and Articles of Incorporation of the Deer
Creek Homeowners Association.
e. Copy of the report of the Department of Real Estate of the State
of California.
The basis of the consideration of a Tax Credit against the fee of
$14,700.00 paid on the first unit of 49 hooves, (two lots still vacant of
the total 51 lots) is set forth as follows:
1. This is the first planned Equestrian unit provided with adequate bridle
trails in front of the lots, planted, fenced with doce,rative fence and
provided for continuing care, including irrigation system. The trails
are not located where they become weed infested and uninviting, wually
sorely providing access to corals.
2. Automatic irrigation systema have been Installed; trees, shrubs, and
Cround cover have been planted and established at a total cost for
the 51 lots of $112,000.00
L]
1
THE DEER CREEK COMPANY t , UFtlCE BUy1'r OWITA LUi GICALIFli IA 91701 (7l4) 939-3323 .
0
I Page 2
3. The By -Lava of the Deer Creek Rcceoners Lssoctatlon, as submitted
herewith, provides continuit7 of application (Sec. 1.0b); sutmstic
membership with ownership (Sec. 3.01); Association Responaibilitiea
(Sec. 6,01); power of operation and management 0 c. 5.02); duty to
maintain records and bc-As (Sec. 5.17); powers of Assesscents (Art. II.).
4. Provisions for continuity and enforcement of cocroo area
maintenance.
5. The acreage in Tract 9582 -1 included In the bridle and equestrian
common areas total six acres. This is approximately 12: of the total
area Included in homesites. This does not Include the paecway area
which has also been landscaped and Is maintained by the bozeowaers
assorlation.
• 6. The open space provided in the first wait and as pledged In
the following units, will provide a total of 36 acres out of
gross available s:resge in the entire project under control of
of the developer, which totals 293 acres.
As additional information, but not spoiled out in yoar ordinance 03,
I'. should be pointed out that Deer Creek Company has prodded a dike and
reception wvf ditch or over 6,000 feet in length across the upper portion of
section 26, which provides major flood protection to roads in the areas to
Chaffcy College, cad to other private and public facilities. The cost to
provide this protection was approximately $100,000. This expenditure was
each prior to any construction or sales of homes.
BeapoetlVslly Sutmltted,
8y:
William R. Grigsby
0
r y,
THE DEER CKCOMPANY UE,URIW b1?IT VW)98�U
.,' .- ..
Y
r
I Page 2
3. The By -Lava of the Deer Creek Rcceoners Lssoctatlon, as submitted
herewith, provides continuit7 of application (Sec. 1.0b); sutmstic
membership with ownership (Sec. 3.01); Association Responaibilitiea
(Sec. 6,01); power of operation and management 0 c. 5.02); duty to
maintain records and bc-As (Sec. 5.17); powers of Assesscents (Art. II.).
4. Provisions for continuity and enforcement of cocroo area
maintenance.
5. The acreage in Tract 9582 -1 included In the bridle and equestrian
common areas total six acres. This is approximately 12: of the total
area Included in homesites. This does not Include the paecway area
which has also been landscaped and Is maintained by the bozeowaers
assorlation.
• 6. The open space provided in the first wait and as pledged In
the following units, will provide a total of 36 acres out of
gross available s:resge in the entire project under control of
of the developer, which totals 293 acres.
As additional information, but not spoiled out in yoar ordinance 03,
I'. should be pointed out that Deer Creek Company has prodded a dike and
reception wvf ditch or over 6,000 feet in length across the upper portion of
section 26, which provides major flood protection to roads in the areas to
Chaffcy College, cad to other private and public facilities. The cost to
provide this protection was approximately $100,000. This expenditure was
each prior to any construction or sales of homes.
BeapoetlVslly Sutmltted,
8y:
William R. Grigsby
0
r y,
THE DEER CKCOMPANY UE,URIW b1?IT VW)98�U
.,' .- ..
Y
t(
OP.DINANCL 110. B
AN ORDINANCE OF TIDE CITY CO117:CIL OF THE CITY •
OF RATICHO CUCAI1011Ga ESTFBLISHING A PARK AVD
RECREATION TAX FOR NLIi RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPIIE(IT
AND PROVIDING FOR THE ADVINIS:RATION, 1L%'.0U1;TS
AND CREDITS THEREOF, REPEALING SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY ORDIIANCE 170. 2126, A:ID DECLARING THE
URGENCY THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF "IC1I0 CL'CA_IONGA
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Intent and Purpose.
The City Council of the Citv of Rancho Cucanonea
hereby declazes a tax on all new residertial devclocrent within
the City for the sole purpose of oroducznq revenue for the
acquisition, development and initial enuiovent of new parks
or additional park lands. This is decl +rcd oursuant to the _
taxing power granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by the
Government Code of the State of California
The purpose of the tax is to assist in financing the olanning,
acquisition and develooment of parks to maintain the level of •
nark service as the City's oonulation increases
SECTION 2. Definitions.
a. 'City' shall mean the City of Rancho Cucanonga.
b. *Residential Develonnent' shall include all
dw:iling units constructed for the first tire on oven lend or
when existing structures Pre remodeled, added to or othen(ise
altered to increase the number of dwelling units.
C. 'Dwelling Unit' shall include each single fanily
dwelling, each unit of an anartnent, duolex dwelling arnuo or
multiple dwelling structure or condomznicn or olanned residential
devel�smant as a separate habitat for one or more persons or each
mobile home space designed to contain a mobile hone trailer on
a semi- pemanent or permanent basis _
d. "Person* includes every oersen, fir.- or cornoration
constructing a dwelling unit directly or t!trough the services cf
any employee, agent or indeoendent cnntractor.
7
1 V
(4, L
SECTION 3. lax: Innosition ane Aoolication.
• A tax is lareby iroosed in the amunts herein set
forth and shall be applicable to every dwelling unit as above
defined constructed in the CiLv after ti:e effective date of
this Ordinance and shall be known as the Parks and Recreation
Tax.
SECTION 4. Tax: Amount.
Every person constructing any duelling unit within
the City of Cucamonga shall Pay the Cit•: the following:
For each single family dwelling unit, the sum of $300.00
For eact..jultiple duelling unit, the aum of $160.00
For each mobile home unit $150.00
SECTION 5. Tax: khan Payable.
The tax imposed in this chanter shall be due and
payable uoon issuance by the City of a building Permit for the
construction of any dwelling unit and shall be refunded only in
the event that the building peinit issued has expired and no
construction has been commenced.
SECTION 6. Discosition of Tax Receiotr.
aThere is hereby established a Pith Develooment Fund.
All suns collected pursuant to this chanter shall be deposited
in said Park Develoorent Fund and shall be used solely for
acquisition, development and initial eeuinrent of new Parks
cr the expansion of land or services on existing parks in
accordance with the Park, Parkway and Onen SDace elono^ of the
Pancho Cucaronga General Plan.
SECTION 7. Partial Credit.
Where private en soave for park and recreational
ourooses is nrovid�d in a Pr000sed subdivision and such snace
is to to privately owned and naintained by tho future residents
of the subdivision, partial credit, not to exceed 50., may be
given against the requirement if the City Council finds that it
is in the public interest to do so and that all the following
standards are not:
a That yards, cnurt areas, setbacks, and other
nuen areas reouired to be m v ntained by the rnr.tnn and buildir,t
nrd.nances and reaulaLions shall 1101- be included in tile eonnuLa-
tion of such private open snare; and
b. That the private ownershin and n1intenance of
® the ooen space is adequate L: orovided for by recorded written
aercement, conveyance, or restrictions; and
`x0
C. That the use of the ori,•ate oven sooee is
re.tricted for Park and rec- entional nurnoges by recorded •
c.•:enant which runs with the land in fa-.-or of the future
nursers of prooerty and which cannot be defeated or eliminated
without the consent of the City; and
d. That the proposed nrivnte open space is reasonably
adaptable for use for oa:k and = ecrearional ourooses, taking
into considerati Dn such factors as size, shape, t000graphy,
geology, access, and locations; and
e. That facilities nreoosed for the ooen soace are
in substantial a•.cordance with the orcvrsions of the recreational
element of the lister Plan of Parks and Recrcationt and
f. That the open space for which credit is given is
a nin_mum of three acres and provides for adequate development
and maintenance of the area for recreat.on ourooses.
Before credit is given the City Manager or his designated reore-
^cntative shall nako written recoru•_endations to the City Council
fir their approval.
SECTION 8. Periodic Revision.
Inasmuch as the tax set forth in this chanter is based
nn averare costs of land and devel"ment, a review shall be con -
ductod pariodically to deterrire whet -er the tax needs revisions
to reflect current costs of such acquisition and develeoment
SECTION 9. Reoeal of San Bernardino Countv Ordinance
No. 21-16
San Bernardino County Orcinance Nn. 2126, heretofore
adopted as an rdinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an re-
cuired by Scction 34328.5 of the Government Code of the State of
California is hereby expressly declared repealed, and is suoer-
ceded as an ordinance of the ^ity of Pancho Cucamonga by this
nrdinance.
SECTION 10. The City of Rancho Cucimonga has just been
I- coronrated and has no funds whatsoever to nrovide Ear the olanning,
aco,,izition and davelonrent of public oarks It is necessrry
that the City acquire funds for s.ich ouroogeg without delay. This
Ordinanco is therefore neecssary for the orotnetion of the oubl:c
health, welfare and general safety acs shall take effect irnediate ],y
upon its ad,ption as an urgency ordinance.
1777. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 2ra day of neccnber
/ lia EST:
AT': yar Pf tru city O •Rancho Cucamonga
� V
C ty Clark X /
PLA%4M —. COINISSTON MI.3"eS SEPMBER 26, 1979
n Lt9SEEg PARK TAT CREDIT - A request for park tax credit for Tract tto. 9582 -1
Mic hacl Pulrin. Associate Planner, revicwrd the staff report Staff recofcends
that the romnission recommend to the City Council that no Park Tax Credit be given
to thin development based upon the criteria set forth in Ordinanc• No 8
>lr. Tone lens, representing Deer Creek, stated their bridle trai.s lead to two
,quare miles or more of public land owned by the flood control district on the
east TMs area will continue to be used as open space in the future That
irea. •+Los their parkways will provide recreation In the sense of the ordinance
is adapt.d Deer Creek provides recreational areas fo their residents, aad
therefore will not require the use of any other park facility that the City rosy
f•avt or nav create in the future It is their opinion some enuitable refund
.,hoi,ld be considered as no prior or current tract within the entire city could
1•321if as they do The Job that has been done by Deer creek 1s enique and
qua Llfics for further consideration by the City
Mr. Doug (lone stated according to the wording of the ordinance his judgement
%vuiJ be that Deer Creek is entitled to a refund. If the Commission is not
in agretoent with the ordinance than the ordinance should be amended; hovover,
at this tine, he does not feet the Commission or Council has any alternative
but to Five some type of refund to Deer Creek.
Cor:nisitoncr Dahl stated it is his opinion that bridle trails are a recreational
facillt and should qualify for a refund If he was to determine the percentage
of tiw refund to be allowed to would look at somewhere between 15 and 20 percent
fie evulJ further like to ask that the Council rested, the ordinance for clarifica-
tion As it stands at the present time, a tefund should be considered.
S Clulmin Rcrpel stated he would agree with Cotissioner Dahl He also added that
if ill the equestrian developments in our area were to put a trail system com-
parible to what Deer Creek has we probably would not be using part of Heritage
Park for an equestrian facility. He would agree that 202 credit be considered.
Ca-,issionor Tolstoy stated Deer Creek is one of the best developments in the
Ury The way In which the ordinance is written Indicates that woe percentage
of .redit should be given hack to the Deer Creek Cocqtany He indicated he would
a.;rce that a 202 refund be considered He does however believe the intent of the
ordinance is different then the way it is written He believes that what was
milli neirt was that any facilities that are constructed by a developer should
be univrrval in nature Ile does not believe that a bridle system 1s one which
evervono within the development will use. However, the way the ordinance is
,rattan lie believes Deer Creek should receive the refund He would also recom-
rend clot the Council restudy the ordinance for clarification
rn- mi,,iuner Jones also Indicated the way in which the ordinance is now written
that Deer Creek Is tntltla to a partial credit
C,,"Ii4loncr Cartta stated a partial credit should be considered; however, it
is ilau his opinion the ordinance shwild be rest,siled for cla:lflcation
t nn•t,.n was mide by Commissioner Datl and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy to
r.•t..-rw•nd that the Citv Council consider a 202 park tax credit for Tract No
ns8: -t
AYCS DAIL. TOLSTOY, JONES. CARCIA, RE1fPE6
;alFS: Ia1;;E
ABSENT: 'ZONE
A motion was made be Coralsstaner Garcia seconded by Camisatoner Tolstoy and
u[animously carried to request that the fkey�ounc tl direct staff to restudy and
clarify the Intent of Ordinance No B . J K.-
TO: Boards of Supervisors
Sheriffs
District Atturoeys
Chief Probation Officers
Public Defenders
City Councilmen
Chiefs of Police
RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE REFORM ACT
It has been prepared at the direction of the regional criminal Justice
• planning board chairmen.
This material describes a model system for local goverment in this State
to receive and spend the Federal crime control money The Executive
$-"tide will provide with d
. receommendationsofor • s
Implementing these
provisions in California.
The full report and recommendations are also provided, so that you can
review, from a historical perspective, how the program has evolved in
the past ten years. It also details the points in the recommendations,
which include:
Program control to local goverment
No new layer, of goverment
Coopera• . and coordinated system -wide planning
Elimination of red tape and paperwork
A simple and direct delivery of LEAA funds
Your su000rt of the recaTCendations is needed. An expression by local
goverment to a State an a era goverment that local autonomy is
desired for the Federal crime control program isgsought er
agreement In addition to an —
order, your supportforthe development of a position by 'henLeaguenof
California Cities and the County Supervisors Association or California
would be appreciated.
163
•1
~
w,T
CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION
3840 17TH STREET RIVERSICE CALIFORNIA 92501 f 0101787 -2221
RICNARO J. KCNYON
[•IDYL•
h
TAYLOR
:NNE
ICf.,N l4 D[Nt
TONY CNOA
,IC R[TANt -tNt �lVf fl,
September 20, 1979
TO: Boards of Supervisors
Sheriffs
District Atturoeys
Chief Probation Officers
Public Defenders
City Councilmen
Chiefs of Police
RE: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAN ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE REFORM ACT
It has been prepared at the direction of the regional criminal Justice
• planning board chairmen.
This material describes a model system for local goverment in this State
to receive and spend the Federal crime control money The Executive
$-"tide will provide with d
. receommendationsofor • s
Implementing these
provisions in California.
The full report and recommendations are also provided, so that you can
review, from a historical perspective, how the program has evolved in
the past ten years. It also details the points in the recommendations,
which include:
Program control to local goverment
No new layer, of goverment
Coopera• . and coordinated system -wide planning
Elimination of red tape and paperwork
A simple and direct delivery of LEAA funds
Your su000rt of the recaTCendations is needed. An expression by local
goverment to a State an a era goverment that local autonomy is
desired for the Federal crime control program isgsought er
agreement In addition to an —
order, your supportforthe development of a position by 'henLeaguenof
California Cities and the County Supervisors Association or California
would be appreciated.
163
You are requested to mail letters, resolutions or minutes orders
suppurting the recommendations by Friday. October 19, 1979, to
Chairman, Criminal Justice Flanning Board Chairmen's Association, c/o
3640 13th Street. Riverside, Californla 92501.
For your convenience. a sample resolution is attached which you might
find useful. Originally developeJ by the :ity of La Habra, an additional
statement has been added to support the enclosed recommendations.
Your assistance in bringing this program to ,ocal control is deeply appre-
ciated.
Sincerely yours.
.l V
CLYDE r ULO
Board of Supervisors
Tulare County
CAAenz
r J
Ri COBURI . CH1 F 0 P LICE
city of Bishop
Chaff rman, Eastern Sierra Criminal
Justice Planning Board
�CK Lf•ti - (MC�7i�
J w! :1
i oar. of Supervisors
Shasta County
H.1
Shasta County Sheriff
Chairman, Northeastern California
Criminal Justice Planning Board
BILL HILL, CORO.Yc
County of San Bernardino
Chairra,., Arr6whead Justice
Association
'Ito� -
a 1 P LIC
C ty of Ntlltter
Chairman, Los Angeles Regional
Criminal Justice Planning Board
A
ED OIKOCK
Chairman, Region C Coordinatin;
Council on Criminal Justice and
Delinquency Prevention
IL RT BAKtK, LHLLr DEPUTE__
Sacramento Sheriff's Department
Chairman, Sacramento Area Criminal
Justice and Delinquency Preven-
tion Planning District
1��
11
r"1
U
i
• �1:A °
Y BUTCH. 1H LE ISRE , PAST CHAIAMAI AfiU HEHGEA
City of Arrolro Grande Orange County Criminal Justice Council
Chairran, Central Coast Regionv City Manager
Criminal Justice Planning Board City of La Habra
i
'J
V
e�aniirman. JOIUI A. HC k`,ERTE. °., CCUICIL:':il
ty of mDerial City of Ventura
Council on Criminal Chaim, y anningRegion Criminal
Justice - Region 5 Board
R3Z
r � ' 1 r�w -.-�
.�r �:.
p
-`. '.i _�
I, mEarrmc skFARY
A. INTRODUCTION:
Since the inception of the Federal Crime Control program effort in
1965, numerous efforts have been made to implement the original
Intent of Congress. The development of a balanced state and local
the history ofresponse
the eprogram. continuous theme throughout
Although California Californ hasproaatlycted
legislatively and administratively to anticipate and implement
expeditiously the current anti -crime legislation, the recognition
of major units of local government as equal but not autonomous
entities from state government has yet to be realized.
B. CONGRESSIONAL INTENT:
The overall purpose of the proposal Law Enforcement Assistance Re-
form Act (5.241) is:
"to aid state and local government in strengthening
and improving their system of criminal and Juvenile d wiithimaximumcertaintyiandcminimmum delaay.- assistance
i
it is the declared intent of Congress to implement the nnyew program
in such away as pplication eliminate offlaws followingxguiding Pro
principies:nts-
tratton through app e
1 Increased emphasis on coordinated cooperative system plannin ".
2 Increased local responsibility and control.
3 Elimination of red tape.
These principles are stated in the bill in a number of ways and
further expanded upon during the Senate floor debate by the bill's
major architects.
The bill makes specific reference to coordinated, coo rative systems
lannin , indicated on Page 33, Line 1 a the D which states,
grants may be made for the purpose of coordinatine the various com-
ponents of the criminal and juvenile Justice system to improve the
O%erall operation of the system.
In regard to increased local res ansibtiIt and Control, the language
throughout the D i appears to place 'state and units of local govern-
ment• on an equal masts. This is most clearly evident in Section 402
(a) of the bill which established "units of local government" on ^n
equal bases with the state as an eligible Jurisdiction Senator Ted
Kennedy further indicates the intent of Congress with the following
remarks during Senate floor debate
•
j&17
The major reform in 5.241 include:
• `Strengthened role for local governments.. large
cities and counties are guaranteed a fixed allotment
of funds and localities are granted greater control
over the use of LEAA funds in their communities.'
El
The elimination of red tae appears to be the most important principle
of a an s c ear y stated as follows:
'It is therefore the declared policy of the rongress
to aid state and local governments in strengthening and
improving their systems of criminal and juvenile justice
by providing financial and technical assistance with
maxima A certainty and minimum delay.'
The bill further states, 'The procedures established to implement the
provisions of this title shall minimize paperwork and prevent need-
less duplication and unnecessary delays in award and expenditure of
funds at all levels of government
C. TRXISITIOA:
On May ,1, 1979 Hr Henry Dogin, Administrator of LEAA, issued trans-
ition instructions to the California State Planning Agency (SPA) that
focu.ad on easing the necessary adjustments and refocusing the oro-
grsm toward :he Law Enforcement Assistance Reform Act (LEA:.,). Hr
Dogin indicated:
'LEAH is comitted to insuring maximum continuity in program
operation in FY 1980 while at the same time laying a firm
foundation for full -scale Implementation of the Justice
System Improvement Act in fiscal year 1931.'
The instructions to the SPA offered to provide incentive funds to the
State if it was acting in good faith in obtaining match appropriation
based on the Justice System Improvement Act. These incentive funds
were then to pass through the SPA directly to potential entitlement
Jurisdictions for the purpose of assuring that these jurisdictions
develop the Planning and administrative capability to assure their
participation in the Justice System Improvement Act
The instructions further directed the State to surveyy all urlsdictions
which nee. the eligibility requirements for direct enntMe nt�-
Section 402(a)(2)(3) and (4) of the proposed Law Enforcement Assistance
Reform Act i n order to determine which jurisdictions will opt for
direct entitlement as defined under that Section when the new Act is
fully implemented (FY 81)
Id F
W
Section 402(a)(1)(2)(3)(4) and (S) provides the following definitions
for categorief eligible for receipt of funds:
1. a State;
2. a municipality which has no less than .15 per centum of total
State and local criminal Justice expenditures and which has a
population of one hundred thousand or more;
3 a county which has i:) less than .15 per centum of total State and
local criminal Justice expenditures and which has a population
of two hundred and fifty thousand or more persons. ..,
4, any combination of units of local government which has a popula-
tion of two hundred and fifty thousand or more persons. . .;
5 a unit of local government, or any combination of such units
without regard to population, which are otherwise ineligible
under the other paragraphs of this subsection.
In response to this requirement the SPA issued a survey instrument
to 37 Jurisdictions (cities and counties). As indicated above, there
are five citegorfcs of eligibility. What is essential is that the
SPA surveyed only categories 1 through 3 and d+sregarded categories
4 and S.
The aim of 5.241, in the words of Senator Kennedy, is to end 'exces-
sive control fthe axisting regions /tombinattiions of governments
were were surveyed and subsequently were elected, by units of local govern-
ment, as their representatives under entitlement status, this would
eliminate a substantial amount of revenue for the SPA. The state
would then be responsible only for state agencies and the 'balance
of -tatty' which would be small or non - existent.
This possible reduction of state financial support and the possible
development of a coal but not autonomous roles for local government
appear to have resu to in the current SPA guidance and transition
procedures which in effect:
1 Discourage identification of potential combination Jurisdictions
at the local level; and,
2. Retain a substantial percentage of the state's population in a
'balance of state' posture
If this action occurs, the new impact may be assessed as fellows:
1 The SPA will remain a dominate controlling factor in the state-
wide program.
3 Q
Id �z
C
2. new layer be si �onc
administer the "increased stateresponbilities% i e balae
of state.
3. A more substantial level of federal LEAH funds for both 'action'
and 'administration' will reside with the state and will not
pass through to local government.
4. Local Jurisdictions within the balance of state category will
lack direct local prerogative in assessment of and addressing their
local Justice system needs, will compete agalrtt each other on a
edk ri and, will lack
ftil capitaliza-
tion for woring toward ao al Yd termined Jsce system.
CALIFORNIA REGINIAL CHAINWIS' ASSOCIATION POSITION:
Because California Jel'very, Sys- ta-
tee in California as an alternative to the current direction the
transition IlowW guiding principles: The Chatrmans'
1. No aett layers of government:
2. Maintenance of 'a unified Jurisdictional or smlti- Jurisdictional
approach;
3. Development of local responses in dealing with the local
problem; and.
4. Maintaining as simple as possible the delivery of service and
dollars.
E. THE RECo,,KnOED WDEL: A CALIFORNIA DELIVERY SYSTEM FOR 5.241:
The recommended model developed by the Regional Chairmen is designed .
to aedress not
respond to only the the expressed interests of the California
en
but
Council on Criminal Justice (CCCJ) in developing a more defined
teadirship role for the Council.
State Council
Under the new Act the State Council's primary function would be to pro-
vide over -all policy direction, oversight and leadership to the state-
wide program.
The Council's primary function would move away from the direct and
intricate administrative matters that currently takes much of CCW's for
ti and the state pagency. entltleemantiJurisdictions ,sand balance Ofhsta r
te
planning
//j
Council Staff
The staff to the Council should provide those services which are re-
quired •
alance oftstate Jurisdictionsz(should staff any exist).
and
Balance of State
Local Jurisdictions not participating as entitlements in the program
would be afforded an oprortunity to participate in the program
through 'balance of -:tote' planning administered through the State
Planning Agency.
Entitlement Jurisdictions
At this time California is divided into 22 regional offices each
serving one or rare cities and counties. There are also three
'mini- block' or single- entity Jurisdictions. There is undoubtedly
ruch potential for reduction of red tape and excessive administrative
control in these organizations as at the State level.
Virtually every unit of local government may be included in an eligible
tr ctingtwithean eligible eeeclaenra ttJurisdictionibiThis would ben -
consistent with congressional intent that such combinations (eligible
Jurisdictions) should exist across the state to the maximum extent
possible.
Staff •
Entitl should For purposes of thiss Model, itvis assumed that units
of governments will unite at the local level or contract their
balance of state fair share to an entitlement based on three primary
actors :
a) decreasing state control of local programs and locally targeted
funds;
b) to avoid unnecessary red taor and creation of an additional level
of government to adoin star - a balance of state;
c) J eiyraaestcatassistance
s g untiicsstemsndagencies communication, and
territorial
tour+ rs
In accord with the guiding principle that the actual delivery system
should be as simple and direct as possible. the following premises
are restated:
a) That the equal but not autonuaus role of the State and entitle-
ment Jurisdictions be recognized by the CCCJ;
l/ /
• b) That the CCCJ assume a pro - active philosophical erwr research rota
for the state.
c) That staff to the CCCJ serve at the pleasure of the Council or in
arcord with the pleasure of the Council through coordination with
the Chief Executive of the State.
F REC%K1jDATI0MS
Based on these premises and to ensure cons.stency with the existing
state taw (Penal Code Section 13904 at seq), the following recommenda-
tions are made:
Action Funds
1. :ne Office of Criminal rustics Planning should disclose the amount
of reverted and/or unobiigated LIAA action and discretionary furda
from 1971 to July 1, 1979, by fund year and fold typo to that
reeorj,wndatiara a= be received by the California Council on
Criminal rustics from all interested parties and a fund corn{tmmt
eon be made within a reasonable period of tine.
2. Action dollars should be distributed solely on the basis of a
fora-ak which considers crilrinat justice expendihaep between
the State and a.- feting planning districts.
• Entitlement Jurisdictions
I nA State should survey the rsrafning 441 .furiedictiau to
deter. their interest in forvW entitle -Ant jurisdiat-:ana,
as provided for in Section 402(a)(4) of 5.241
2. Gating planning district# with poputaticna of at least 250,000
should florction as entitlament ,jurraedictioens, as provided by 5.241,
Section 402(a1(4), by J&-=V 1, 1980.
J. Erlatfrg planning distriots with populations of Zoe& than 250,000
should ba troated as entitZe-.ant Jurisdictions by Jaarcnyy 1, 1980
in order to avoid placing another layer of bursavarccy in thi
Cc lifornia program. • (4021 tat M.
Performance Measurement
S.241 places increased emphasis on the development of accurate per-
formance measures to inform Congress on the impact of the new legis-
lation. These performance measurements are focused upon the 23 pro-
gram areas incorporated in Section AJl of 5.241 (Eiden Amendment).
-This recommendation will require LEAA approval for its implementation
but it is reasonable, prudent. and consistent with the 'red tape' reduction
® called for in the pending legislation.
/ -6-
Entitlement jurisdictions within the State of California are aware of •
the extreme importance of the development of adequate statewide
performance measures and recommend the following:
I. EZfrrinate the current If prrgrar areas and replace with the 23
program areas eandatad by the nrr tegiaiation.
2. Allocate fmds to the jurisdictions which will became entitlerrsnt
jurisdictions for the purpose of developing goats, objeat£ves, and
psrforrcmoe maarrras for the 23 fedeml p>ogrimn areas.
J. Develop polices and procedures designed to rest the sinii .
federal gufdat£res while org0&asizi g toot -tevet concerns.
a At the local level coordinate evaluation resources (because of tie
decreasing plmens:ng dollars available).
Planning Funds
The provisions of the new legislation with respect to the planning
and administrative provisions should be applied uniformly throughout
t'•c State, rather than selectively.
I. planning and GdCri.nistritive Jlnde allocated to the State of
California in PI 1880 should be allocated to the tonal Jurisdic-
tions c=.vnsumte with their level of responsibility..
2. rho office of Crir£nat -rustics PZanxing should disclose the ,
mount of surplus funds set acids for State planning and adrn{-
etratio: and not be atlavad to plan for a surplus at the direct
expense of other pZorming .entities.
J. Ari shifts or changes in the distribution of plmn6ng and a6r£ri-
stration fw ds bs defamed mrtit such tiro that there is a full
and complete indication of the status of antitlaaent jurisdictions
inclusive of corrbinatiore.
- 7 -
113
•
• RESOLUTION1 NO. 79-86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
cUCAMQNGA, CALIFORNIA, ENCOURAGING THE CONTINUED DEVELOPUENT
OF REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, The IEAA program has been in existence for over
ten years, and
WHEREAS, California has develnped the regional delivery
system, and
WHEREAS, most :hies and most :,.aties have participated and
have benefited from the regional system, and
WHEREAS, the new LEAH legis,ation provides for "Entitlement
Jurisdictions" so that funding can be accomplished with less red tape,
and
WHEREAS, the new legislation effectively reduces the authority
of the state to intervene in local criminal justice activities, and
WHEREAS, entitlement jurisdictions consist of
• 1 The State;
2 Cities over 100,000 population
3 Counties over 250,000 population; and
4 Any combination of such units within at least :50,000
poiulation; and
WHEREAS, there are approximately thirty -seven entitlement
Jur,•.dirtions as se: forth under 2 and J above, and
WHEREAS, over four hundred other jurisdictions are dependent
uoon the state for LEAA funding unless they join together, and
WHEREAS, fragmentation of the criminal justice system must
he avoided, and
WHEREAS, the joining of individual cities and counties
together to entitlement jurisdictions will enhance local control and
raximize the use of EEAA funds, and
WHEREAS, the joining together of cities and counties into
�ntitlrvnent jurisdictions will make the combinations equal to the
,late but not autonomous
NOw, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Rancho
Cucamonga does endorse the concept of cities and counties joining
er together and creating en entitlement jurisdiction,
M
nesoiutiun No. /9 -8b
Pago 2
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Rancho Cucamonga urges the
Gilifornia League of Cities (or the County Supervisors Association o.
California) to adopt a resolution encouraging the continued development
oO entitlerent Jurisdictions •
NOW, THEREFORE, The City of Rancho Cucamonga supports the
findings and recommendations of the report by the chairmen of California's
regional criminal Justice planning boards entitled "Equal Bat Not
Autononous" and urges those recommendations to be an integral part
of the implementation of the Law Enforcement Assistance Rofoni Act
in the State of Califarnia
ATTEST
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this—day of , 1979
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
t—y 7 erT-
IlS
Mayor
•
9
' M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager
no11: Samuel Crowe, City Attorney
DATE: October 3, 1979
RE: Appointment of City Clark and /or City Treasurer.
The City Clerk and City Treasurer are required to be
elected unless at a municipal or special election. The Cfty
Council submits the question of whether one or both should b6
appointed by the City Council. The Government Code, 'section
36509, specifically provides for the wording to be used in the
event there is an election. The wording and form should be one
• of the following:
1:J
SAMPLE A:
the offices of City Clerk and City YES
ror bo appointive?
PNO
SAMPLE B:
Shall the office of City Clerk be
appointive?
YES
NO
Shall the office of City Treasurer
o appointi�e7
YES
No
_3 /W
SAMPLE Ct
;hall the office of City Clerk be RYES ippointive7
SAMPLE D:
1, the office of City Treasurer YES
a?po: 'Itive7
NO
As you can see from Samples C and D, the City round
also could elect to have only one of the offices appointed.
Unfortunately, persona must be allowed to run for the
office on the same ballot in the event the voters decide not to
hhve appointed City :lark or City Treasurer, but rather to have
elected offices. Also, it would be advisable to establish a
salary for these positions prior to the election to avoid the
issue of whether or not a salary can be granted after an elec-
tion.
SC :sgg
cc: Mayor
cc; City Council Members
-2- 117
•
CITY�OE g r 0 �p�,s nt DEPT.
�„gn1T't 6EwE�g
Co i L .i 1959
ptE
� 8191n1u1u11i2131'1r`�(B
October IS, 1979 =
TO: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR, RANCHO CUCAMONGA
i +
Sedway /Cooke Dlim and Environmental
Planters end Designers
925 PoylkAvenue
San Rikntcrero
W himia 94111
(415) 49.3-0966
FROM: SEDWAY /COOKE
RE: NO. SC-RC-Olt CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROGRAM FOR WFUTAL
PLAN AND EIR
It is generally acknowledged that dtizen participation will be an important element
In the formulation of the Rancho Cucamonga General Pian and Its accompanying
EIR. It follows that the City and Sedway /Cooke should devote time at the outset
of this effort to carefully structure a citizen participation process. The purpose
of this memo Is twofold. One, it presents our observation an citizen participation
within the unique context of Rancho Cucamonga. Two, it presents a suggested
approach to citizen participation. The approach Is preliminary and our purpose
in presenting it to you', I, zolicit your comments based an yw.a intimate know-
ledge of local corditio,w. Once we have received your comments we should then
agree on an approach am establish a schedule for its execution, Tt s work will
proceed concurrently with our preparation of a detailed work program for your
review and comment.
OBSERVATIr.NS ON CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
1. Rancho Cucanr:-ga is a young community and interest In Its future is strong.
An effective citizen participation prograrr. should be established to take odvan-
toge of this enthuslasm.
2. The Advisor? Committee created during the incorporation process established
subcommittees on land use, education, circulation, public utilities, health
and safety, open space, and goverrarent coordination, all of which developed
expertise that would be useful In preparing the General Plan. Use of the
Land Use Subcommittee's work, with the county, on a "Design Study" would
be particularly beneficial.
it
�3
3. The City comprises three distinct communities. Each has Its own perceptions
on how the individual communities as well on the City as a whose should inter-
relate and grow. These op'nions should be heard mnf di(ftten of reconciled
In an open, constructive forum.
4. MoJor groups that already exist and may be considered for participation Include
homeowners (Citizens Advisory Commissions), local business concerns, developers
(Building Industry Associatlon), local industrial concerns (Industrial Committee),
Chat fey College, and Inland Counties Legal Services.
5. Based on the above two observations, It is essential that sane framework
be created wherein all the concerned actors can meet will%one another.
The intent of this arrorgement is to get various Interest groups exchanging
viewpoints with one another fore to face. Our role is one of (greeting the
dialogue, moderating the discussion, and synthesizing the moods of the groups
so that they can be reflected In the General Plan
6. North Town, as a well-defined cammuti ty, should have its concerns, as well
as the City concerns for North Town, Included In the planning process.
7. The General Plan Is a document that will provide guidance for the conservation
and (utur s aevolopment of the City. Citizens must he given the opportunity
to partic pate in Its preparation so they regard the Plan as their own. Without
this sense of Identification, there Is little Incentive an the part of the com-
munity to ensure that the goals and ObJectives are implemented Rancho
Cucamonga has a unique opportunity to make Its General Pion a useful, mean-
ingful, and accepted document.
SUGGESTED APPROACH FOR CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Role of Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC
The CAC would be a newly created group of local representatives that would inte, t
with the consultant throughout the general plan process. There are three specific
roles, or functions, for the CAC. At the outset it is Important to Inform members
of the CAC that their fixation is not to set policies. Their primary function Is
strictly advisory, and In this capacity, they will help focus our work to be more
respomlve to critical local issues, to develop relevant goals and objectives, and
to Identify reasonable options for addressing the Issues.
As a group that will meet throughout the gunning pprrseas, the CAC has a distinct
vantage point from which to see the Plan evolve. The CAC would be on indepen.
dent body, and its second function would be to mdse Its own decisions and reeom.
mendations to the City Council. However, we expect to work very closely with
the CAC not only to present Information but also to use it as a source for ideas.
Based on frequent exchanges and meetings, It Is hoped that there would be general
camensus between CAC recommendations and our recommendations.
SlPdwaf' /Cooke UnbanandEmlmxonentai Rennenend Designers San Ftenasco California
o CDVNCIL �1r�P��'
CITY OF RAhnln CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Datet October 16, 1079
To: City Council
From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development
Subject: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROGRAM FOR THE GENIRAL PLAN AND EIR
Please find attached a copy of a report submitted to the Community Develop-
ment Director regarding establishing a citizen participation program for
the General Plan and the EIR The thought Is to establish a citizen parti-
cipation proreae Lo solicit broad base participation in the General Plan
program. It should be mentioned that there is no one single right way of
handling citizen participation for a community, but after discussing this
matter with staff members and others associated with the program It was
felt that a forral advisory committee for the general plan would have merit,
and that such an advisory group should have broad base representation and
to be effective be less than 25 Individuals HLwever, the question of pre -
else number is not conclusive nor is the exact representation for such a
committee. The consultant's eem explore% the various Issues regarding
citizen participation and the structure and responsibilities for an advisory
committee
The purpose of the me - is intended to help the City Council focus on the
Issue and to help the Council deeld- what kind of citizen participation process
and what structure of an advisory committee it might desire The staff apolo-
gizes for submitting this materiall late for this agenda; however, the timing
of the signing of the contract and the fact that additional delays without
exposure to the Issue would be detrimental to the early progress of the
general plan (The consultants' letter was flown in by PSA today )
1,11ilc the staff r, not t..ctng a specific dee!slon by the City Coum ll on
October 17, 1579, ntaff dest•os to explore the issue and seek guidance from
the City fau17-11 na to %fiat It wishes to do for the future meeting If you
have any quest ens, please call
Respr t alhI lIi1/a hmlt led,
JACK LAN, ��Director
Com.nity Development
JL: nm
Finally, as representatives from various Interest groups, CAC members can be
expected to "filter" Infomtotion bock to their own constituencies and, thereby,
provide the mew for even broader -baud participation.
Competition of the CAC
It Is Important that the CAC have adequate representation, both in terms of goo-
grcph:c coverage as well as In terms of various Interest groups in the community.
What we want to avoid is a particular Interest group appearing at a meeting some
seven months Into the process, claiming Ignorance of the project, and demanding
that their viewpoint be heard The following list is a suggested composition for
the CAC. The numbers in parentheses are the number of representatives from
each particular group.
W City Council
(2) Planning Commissior
(2) Alta Loma Citizens Advisory Commission
(2) Cucamonga Citizens Advisory Commission
(2) Et.wanda Citizens Advisory Commission
(1) Lc cal small business and professional concerns
(1) Industrial concerns
(1) Building /development concerns
(1) Environmental concerns
(1) Low and moderate income housing concerns
(1) Schools
(1) Parks and recreation
(1) Wastewater treatment
The last four groups are felt to be important M.couse they represent critical factors
in the ^it, s development.
Membership on the CAC is restricted to those residing and/or working within
the City. Flowever, because rtany of the City's decisions will affect neighboring
communities, It is appropriate for the City to solicit their opinion. This can be
done on a formal basis through the respective city councils, perhaps through memo-
rondo for understanding. It would of be necessary, nor appropriate, to invite
other city council members tc participate in the CAC, as the General Plan should
reflect local desires and concerns.
Meetings of the CAC
Because of the Importance of close interaction between the community and our-
selves, several meetings have been scheduled. Three of these meetings are para-
mount to an effective, useful general plan:
o discussion of critical issues
o discussion of goals and objectives
o discussion of options /alternatives.
Sedwsy /Cooke Urban and Envtmm rdW PLvwkm eM Des.g.. wm San Frannsco California
The first meeting tells us wherher "are on the right track and have some ograv-
ment an what the City views as Its major concerns. At the second meeting we
will explore the City's basic Ideals m they relate to each of the General Plan
elements, keeping In mind that they are all interrelated. Identlfkatfon of these
citywide goats, then sets the framework for dealing with the critical Issues. The
third critical meeting is to discuss options and examine alternative approaches
to resolving the critical Issues. The optional alternatives need to be consistent
with the citywide goats. Other meetings are scheduled for other critical Junc-
tures througiaut the process.
Meetings of the CAC will be of a workshop format and open to the public. Portion*
of each meeting will be set aside for question-and-answer with the general public.
However, most of the dialogue will be between ourselves and the CAC —this should
be stated and understood from the beginning. In closing, the Intent of these meet-
ings and the Citizen Participation Program in general is to Involve all segments
of the community at points where they can have real choices and Input on work
that we undertake.
Techniques for Citizen Participation
We have used a variety of techniques to encourage public participation. Depend-
ing on the Issue and the community, all have been effective in terns of attracting
attendance and distributing Information. Several techniques that we are well
familiar with include newspaper supplements, press releases, in depth, topical
articles, interv'ews on radio shows, public service announcements, and depositing
materials at local libraries.
As described earlier, the format for the CAC meetings would be workshops We
envision them to be Informal give-arnd-take sessions. as opposed to structured
presentatiore. For example, at the critical issues meeting we may present the
CAC members with a checklist and ask them to decide which issues are most
important. At the options meeting, we may open the meeting by asking the CAC
members to discuss among themselves the most appropriate ways to resolve Issues.
We in turn would suggest options that we feel are feasible based an our analysts
of the issues. The goal o! these workshops Is to get CAC members to participate
by actively involving them and going through the Generit Plan process with them
step -by -step.
Responsibility
Roth the City and Sedway /Cooke have resprvibility for ensuring the success of
the citizen participation program. Sedway /Cooke will be responsible for preparing
materials for the CAC meetings, conducting the meetings, and using the results
to prepare a responsive General Plan, the City, in tun, Is expected to arrange
meetingst send cut notices of meetings, and distribute materials to be reviewed
by CAC members The City is.iso responsible far preparing memoranda that
summarize and eonf irm the recommendations made at the CAC meetings
Sedwsy /Cooke Urban" Environmental Planners and Desgran San Fnnosco CafHonv
C^MMEKT. S ON THE CI"PROPOSED CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROGRAM
It is our undpntarding that the city is currently discussing proposals for a General
Plan citizen participation program. Based on our understanding of the proposal,
we we submitting the following conwnents.
1. A CAC of IS members may be too small to include the various interest groups
whose opinions should be heard. in our propovd ranpnsitim for the CAC,
we he" Included Inland Counties Legal Services and representatives of the
school, sewerage, parks districts and other groups because they can speak
on critical issues that the City's Genercl Plan must address. We would prefer
to recognize these issues at the very beginning of the planning process by
involving their spokespersons In this process. Failure to Include these persons
In the process will only enable them to attack Its credibility. Including those
persons in the process will also force them to subject their particular interests
to scrutiny of persons representing competing Interests.
L We would rather work with a large group than limit the number of participants.
It has been our experience that much greater efficiency Is achieved by having
all the concerned actors cormwmicatirg from the start. As a practical matter,
It is possible to work with groups of 40 people If they are tightly organized.
By Including representatives from the schools, sewerage, and parks districts,
the CAC may begin to assume the appearance of a technical odvisory commit-
tee. However, these representatives should not be Involved In the day - today
enr,neerhtg and administration of the service; they should be members of the
respective governing boards. This approach mimes that these critical concern
are addressed in the meettrg: without being overly technical.
J. We do not advise separating the CAC into task forces, eocli concentrating
on a different element of the Plan. The Intent of formirsq a CAC Is to work
with a body that will relate to the Issues from a broader, more comprehensive
perspective. There is a tendency for a task force to get so engrossed witn
Its own subject matter that It loses sight of how that subject is to relate
to the other elements of the Plan. Consequently, we prefer dealing with
o single body that will be responsible for addressing all General Plan concerns
In an integrated fashion. A town -ho'r meeting Is a very useful approach for
obtaining public input, however, ss ch a technique may undermine the value
and utility of a CAC. The attitude of the CAC may became one of "Why
bather? These same Issues will come before the public at a town hall meet -
Ing, so we're just wasting our time now."
4. In order to obtain the wide participation that we think you are trying to en-
courage with the town -hall approach, we recommend that the CAC meetings
be open to the public, but it should be clear that the community's major Input
will be through the CAC. This In turn will put pressure on the CAC members
to get back to their own constituencies to make sure they are accurately
representing their Interests.
Sed"Y /Cooke Urban and Enmonrnentai Ptarrers and Deognen San Fnmsco California
CIT ENGINEER'S REPORT
FOR
LANDSCAPE 0AINTENANCE DISTRICT NC. I
Original Formation
Lloyd Huai
City Enginerr
October 17, 1979
:ABLE OF c0111ENTS
SECTION 1 Authority for Report
Page 1
SECTION 2 General Description
Page 1
SECTION 3 Plans and Specifications
Page 1 5 2
SECTION 4 Estimated Costs
Page 3
SECTION 5 Assessment Diagram
Page 3
cr"TON 6 Assessments
Page 4 E 5
SECTION 7 0•dor of Events
Page 4
TABLE 1
Page 2
MASTER ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
See Exhibit A
TRACT ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
See Attached
RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEERS REPORT
Page 6
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM DISTRICT
Page 7. 8 b 9
RESOLUTION FORMING DISTRICT
Page 10
i
i
h
CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE MAIIITEIUUICE DISTRICT NO. 1
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT
This report is prepared in compliance with the requirements of
Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code,
State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
SECTION 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION
The report deals with the establishment of Landscape Maintenance
Districts for various subdivisions throughout the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Areas to be included in the work program are specifi-
crlly defined to the body of the report and on the attached
Assessment Diagrams The total area of said parkways being
167,522 square feet. Mork to be provided for, with the assess -
uvnts established by the District, are:
The furnishing of services and materials for the
ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and
servicing of any parkway improvement Improvement
maintenance is Lonsidered of general benefit to all
areas in the District and cost shall be divided on
a per lot basis
SECTION 3 PLANS AND SPECIFILATION
The plans and specifications for landscaping have been prepared by
the developers for the individual subdivision parkways as listed
in Table I The plans and park%-,ys are as stipulated to the con-
ditions of approval for each subdivision and as approved by the
City Planning Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject
tract maps and the assessm.+nt diagram for the exact location of
the landscape areas The plans and specifications for landscape
improvements on th• individual tracts are hereby made a part of
tnis report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications
were attached hereto
1-
I
TABLE I
ASSESSMENT AREAS
AND
PARg1AY LIHITS
-2-
ASSESSMENT
LANDSCAPED AREA
NUMBER
DIAGRA14 NUMBER
TRACT
PARKWAY
IN SQUARE FEET
OF LOTS
1
9267
Archibald Avenue
11,151
28
2A,2D
9268
chthystdStreet
53
8,505
3A,311
9269
Wilson Avenue
17,250
53
Archibald Avenue
13,109
4A.48
9306
Archibald Avenue
17,645
48
5A,5B
9351
Sapphire Street
5,913
63
6
9402
Leann Street
3,300
89
�
7
9403
r
8A.80
9430
Wilson Avenue
12,760
29
f'
Haven Avenue
4,420
f
9
9434
19th Street
3,015
32
10
9436
Victoria Street
3.665
27
Haven Avenue
4,420
11
9437
Victoria Street
6,650
28
S
12
9444
Archibald Avenue
25,680
81
T
13
9445
Wilson Street
6.650
}
14
9454
Haven Avenue
6,168
59
e
15
9472
19th Street
3,161
60
r,
16
9480
Base Line
4,300
54
TOTALS
167,522
704
-2-
Detailed maintenance activities on the enumerated parkway areas
include:
The repair, removal or replacement of all or any part
of any improvement, providing f�. the life, growth,
health and beauty of the landscaping, including cult. -
vation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing or
treating for disease or injury, the removal of trimmings,
rubbish, debris and other solid waste, the maintenance,
repair and replacement as necessary of all irrigation
systems, and the removal of grafitti from walls imre-
diately adjacent to the cultivated areas.
SECTION 4. ESTIMATED COSTS
No costs will be incurred for parkway improrvement const•vcticn.
All improvements will be constructed by developers Based en data
from other cities, contract analysis and developed work standards,
it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purpases will
equal forty cents ($ 40) per square foot per year These costs
are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on -actual cost
data
The estimated total cost for Landscape Hainten+mce District No. 1
comprised of 704 lots and per lot costs are shown below:
Total Annual Maintenance Cost•O 40 x 167,522 $67,008.80
Per Lot Annual Assessment-67,008.8n + 704 $95.18 per year
Per Lot Ibnthly Assessment $7 93 per month
Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and
the attached Assessment Diagrams.
SECTION 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
A copy of the proposed Faster Assessment diagram is attached to this
report and labeled 'Exhibit A° Detailed diagrams of each tract are
included as sheet _I through _16 These diagrams are hereby
Incorporated within the text of this report
-3-
SECTION 6. ASSESSMENT
improvements for the entire district is found to be of general
benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall
be equal for each parcel
It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the
District. (see Assessment Allocations, page 5)
SECTION 7 ORDER OF EVENTS
1. City Council approves institution of District proceedings
2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of
City Engineer's report.
3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to form a District
and sets a public hea ^ing date.
4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony
and determines to fora a District or abandon proceedings.
5 Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with
City Council.
6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing
and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments.
-4-
ASSESSMENT ALLOCATIONS
TRACT
LOTS
ASSESSMENTS
9267
1 through
28
$95 18
each
9268
1 through
53
$95.18
each
9269
1 through
53
$95.18
each
9306
1 through
48
$95.18
each
9351
1 through
63
$95.18
each
9402
1 through
46
$95.18
each
9403
1 through
43
$95.18
each
9430
1 through
29
$95.18
each
9434
1 through
32
$95.18
each
9436
1 through
27
$95 18
each
9437
1 through
28
$95.18
each
9444
1 through
20
S95 IS
each
9445
1 through
61
595.18
each
9454
1 through
59
$95.18
each
9472
1 through
60
$95.18
each
9450
1 through
54
595.18
each
-5-
RESOLUTION NO 79-BD
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA. ;CHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFOR9IA, OF 1RELIMINARY APPROVAI OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NUMBER 1.
RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
that
WNERLAS, on the 5th of July, 1979, said City Council directed
the City Engineer to make and file with the City Clerk of said City a
report In writing ae required by toe Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972;
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City
Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under pursuant to
said Act, which report hvv been presented to this Council for conaidcration;
WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each
and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said
report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires
or should be modified in any respect;
NOW. THEREFORE, it is ordered as follow.:
1. That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and
expenses of said work and of the Incidental expenses in connection
therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby,
preliminarily approved and confirmed
2 That the diagram shoving the Assessment District referred
to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of
land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved
and confirmed
3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of
land it said Assessment District In proportion to the estimated benefit
to be received by said subdivision, respectively, iron said work and of
the incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said report is hereby
preliminarily approved and confirmed
4 That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's
Report for the purposes of all subsequent proteedlnRs, and pursuant to
the proposed district
ATTEST:
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this -day of , 1979.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
-6-
Ydyor
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -81
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C177 OF RANCHO
r UCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER
THE FORMATION OF LANDSCAPE MAINTF_NANCE DISTRICT IA 1;
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT Of 1172; AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR NEARING OBIF.CTIONS 14ERETO
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamrnga, pursuant
to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1977, belog
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Co.ifornln,
does resolve as follows:
Cescription of Nark
SECTION 1: :I:at the public Interest and convenfecce require
and it is the Intention of this Cfty Council to form a maintenance
district in the City of Rancbo Cucamonga for the maintenance and
operation of those parkways and facilities thereon dedicated for
common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map
within the boundaries of the proposed mairtenarce district described
in Section 2 hereof Said mairtenance and operation Includes the cant
and supervision of any sprinkler system, trees, grass, plantings.
landscaping, ornamental lighting, structures, walls, in connection
wit said parkways
Location of York
SECTION 2: The foregoing described work is to be located
within roadway right -of -way and landscaping easements emacersted In
the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on
maps which are on file in the City's Clerk's uifice, entitled "AsseasmcnL
Diagrams landscape Maintenance District No. W.
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3: That the contemplated work, In the opinion
of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit,
and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work
chargeable upon a district, which said district to assessed to pay
the costs and expenses thereof, and which district Is described as
fol lws:
All that certain terrltr -v of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
included within the exterior bou 7 lines sho . upon that certain
"Nap of Landscape Maintenance District No 1," heretofore approved
by the City Council of Said City t)y Resolution No. 79 -80, indicating
by said hounds" line the extent of the territory Included within
the proposed assessment district and which map Is on file in the
Office of th. City Cle -k of said City
_7_
Resolution No. 79 -81
Page 2
and
Reference is hereby made to said map for further, f ll said
more particular description of said assessment district, and
nap so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said
assessment district.
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution
vo 79 -80 has approved the report of the City Engineer which report
indicates the amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary,
1ssessment zones, and the method of assessment The report titled
"Engineer's Report, Landscape Maintenance District No 1" is on file
in the office of the City Clerk of said City Reference to said
report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent
of the assessments and for the extent of the work.
Collection of Assessments
SECTION 5: The assessment shall be collected at
time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected
Engineershall file a report annually with the City Council 0'
and said Council will annually conduct a hearing upon cai: re,
their first regular meeting in June, at which time assessments
next fiscal year will be determined t
rime and Place of Hearing
SECTION 6: Notice is hereby given that on the 7th day
„ve -,bar, 1979 at the hour of 7:00 p m in the City Council Chambers
at 7105 Carnelian, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, any and all persons
havirg any objections to the work or extent of the assessment district,
out appear and
show formed not be done or carried
inaccordancewith
this Resolution of Intention. Protests must be in vr4ting and must
contain a description of the property in which each signer thereof is
interested, sufficient to identify tho same, and vast be delivered to
the City Clerk of said City prior to the time set for the Hearing, and
no other protests or objections will be considered If the signer
of any protest is not shown upon the last equalized assessment roll
of San Bernardino County as the owner of the property described in
the protests, then such protest must contain or be accompanied by
written eviience that such signer is the owner of the property so
described.
La dscoping and Li -htinR Act of 1972
SECTION 7: All the work herein proposed shall be done and
carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State
of California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,
being Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California
-8-
Resolution No. 79 -81
Page 3
Publlcatlon of Resolution of intention
SECr1nN 6: Published notice shall be made pursuant to
Section 6961 of the Government Code The t:ayor shall sign this RVItUlUtilal
and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall
cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the
hearing, at least once In The Dailv Report, a newspaper of general
cira lotion published In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in Lite City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of , 1979.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
-9-
Mayor
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CODUC'L OF THE CITY OF RAIICI40
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION
WITH FORIIATION LANDSCAPE ININTENANLE DISTRICT NUMBER 1
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did
on the 7th day of November, 1979, adopt its Resolution of Intention No
79 -81 to order the therein described pork in connection with Landscape
Maintenance District Ilo 1, which Resolution of Intent! ^^ flu " -81 was
duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as requi ^ed by
law, shown by the affidvait of Publication of said Resolution of Intention
on file to the office of the City Clerk; and
WHERE&.%, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of
said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement ", was duly
and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number
as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Postinq said
notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and
WHCREAS, -fter the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption
of the Resolution of Intention were du:v mailed to all persons awning
real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in
said Resolution of Intention No 79 -81, accerding to the nags and
addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as
known to the City clerk of the City of Cucamongr, which said copies were
duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as ret,r!red by law, as appears
from the Affidavit of Bailing on file in the offr^e of the City Clerk;
and
WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered
evidence.oral and documentary, concerning the , jurisdiction facts in this
proceeding and conrerni% the necessity for the conter,olat?' work and
the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council naving now
acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work;
SECTION I It is hereby resolved by the My Council of
the City oTanM Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience
requires the annexation to the district and the ordering f work, and
said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set fort and described
'n said Resolution of Intention No 79 -81, be done and midt; Pod
SECTION 2 Be it further resolved that thf report filed by
the Engineers Hereby finally approved; and
SECTION 3: Be it finally resolved that the asse sments for
fiscal yea —r TW79 and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report
are hereby epproved
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1979.
P a�yor
ATTEST -10-
City Clerk
A
w Fr
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I
/9
W /B
C
Q
zo r
,r
::H
/c 11
22 W S s
~
,J K
W
23 Y ; 4
/4 /J
24 J
smLE sr.
o
V
0
H2'
R
BANYgN ST.
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
1979.— I
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
!
City er Landscaping Area
TRACT S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
-T-jFT
w
ss SZ ri so S's VB
W
i
I
MgN79N /%R' ofr 97
'7 :1 •r Li -r Is
W
w
N
i
ti
V
i9 re n rc rs
SUMP(OWER er.
r1 A
n
It
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of _
1979. --
/
�� er
wr ••rw.r r.c.nrwr T
10
iqi 9
b
4 g
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
=+ Landscaping Area
TRACT 9268 I f OF 2
I
1
3
4
3
L %
7
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of _
1979. --
/
�� er
wr ••rw.r r.c.nrwr T
10
iqi 9
b
4 g
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
=+ Landscaping Area
TRACT 9268 I f OF 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE MSTR' T NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CU( aONOA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAPOINO
STATE OF CALIFOrNIA
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
•
this day of
1979.—
City
t
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
• Landscaping Area
TRACT 9268 I2 of 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
WILSON AVE.
75 so :B 17 II
90
i
91 � 36 30
15 31 L9
I
93 j 3f 3L 7 '-
In�VJ
C0770NWpp� 33
w'4Y )�
11
D
n 13 ly 10 <
IS 0
16 U
/9 Q:
17 <
/a 1
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk\
this day of I
1979.—
LEGEND
City Clerk — Assessment District Bounda y
„r Landscaping Area
r rRACr 9269 F Z A J
i
n
rd
IV
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSC /PE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNT/ OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST /TE OF CALIFORNIA
A
N
I �
WILSON AVE
l y7 yB
2 Bn yr 4O
IU
3 f/ vi All
4 ti = W yt
c
55� -
5 fJ 2 of ^93
COTTONWOOD WAY
f; lec in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of LEGEND 1979
Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
City Cler
I TRACT 9269 I2oF2 In
dw.
t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
20 21 22 2J 2f
1
17 Q
Ln C.OL /NA DA.
II
III ✓�l \yy`I Q I
I ,
/S Q Z6
Y G h Js 27 0
C T
U
9f 37
20 Q
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk --
this _ day of LEGEND
1979 — Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
City Clerk
yi f
fa
r�
9
mi
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON9A
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
2
e 93 36 29
It
i
4a
35 30
o c
VI I y� 3Y y `
I
415
J —
9 � Q
l
33 S2
B ALMOND tiT
�
I
T 6 S y 3 Z / U
Q
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk -- this day of
1979. —"—' LEGEND
• 1
J — Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
..�. -- . ��,.,„,� rl TRAcr 9306 Z F 2
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed in the Office of tFe City Clerk
this day of
1979
City CIFFF-
F �
A
Y
0
sy
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
— Landscaping Area
W
LU
a
a
c
I TRACT 9351 I l A 2
ary ���wur M. M, Ti
M
■ 411 -7;r.-
TRACT 9351 2 F 2
B
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
o°
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
u
N l
STATE OF CALIFORN.A
u
p Q
T
u
c
Ll n
m
J N N
Cl 9
N C
W
O L
O
T
1S ff
O m u
dv
,V•
Y
14 P s9
�
„ v
=P
SS
16 91 'AE
32
sz
17 95
1B f/ 3/
16
N
ti
19 Q 47 my 30
a �
a a
o
2D U 9e z�
I
Y1 MARBLE AVE. 2B
t2 23 21 tf 26 21
■ 411 -7;r.-
TRACT 9351 2 F 2
B
W
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
;.ANDSCAPC MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LfMON
13 IT
_f) 9-
/6 q
l7 8
18 17
OR /s TOL OR.
FA
z
3
4
i
6
1:tl TI TL T; TI
t
t
t
e
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of '
1979
C er
41l ��pmN LGFAM
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
— Landscaping Area
TRACT 9402
1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 i
A
CITY OF RAr'PO CUCA14ONGA
5
COUNTY OF SAII BERNARDINO d°
v SiATC OF CALIFORNIA FORNI
u \ e7 1 It _ _ , ~¢
N
1
u /0 G.O
W ffjj 6
W I I U E N
O L 1(. W N l
d
J N N
BI{.. 1DL .= J
I
V U fMVL
.ec I
17 � a
.� NOf 1w /i iJ JI
t! z4
I I T
savA.tr + I�
,/ i aav- w --1
-I /r a
r r
to� / zr !o zl z �
!7
T� •. at
3s fr /
57 I j
OINC
µTA LZ"
TRACT 5403
♦.Ia r�aM�I f.fA.)JM)
7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
W
Q
2 R s
U� 6
W
Po.�LgR
ly
W¢
m
1 IF
1
� W /(•SON
1
:fled in the Office of the City Clerk
this day Of
1979
i
1 tv er
9
to
f7
i
25
U
J
7 �
K
29
20
f7
1 28
25
STREET
R
RVE
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
— Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9430 11OF 2
Op. .. FN.. MO. 32410 T•
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE C.'• CALIFORNIA
POPLRR
WILSON 1761E
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of ,
1979
City er
J
Z
Z
U
a
C
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
..... Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9430 I20F 2
....,..., LI......1 r q
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
24
25
26
J
27 W
Q
26
29
30 Q
J
31 V'
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk 1
this day of ,I
1979 — I
Citty el k
u l upnm cu.» u,
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
TRACT 9434 1 9
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk I
this day of I �7
1979.— -- I
City —C er
W
Q
W
i
4M �n�NlV LCD. OI•f
yr
l7 l2 �
eft,_ 4VC
/3 /O 7
/b 9 B
n
/B /y w 2/ 22
4
29
3 12 11
LEGEND
--- Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
TRACT 9436
/O
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SCG T,p/�T 9f SL Q
17
/4 IB
/ /2 j
13 /9
/! Se
J /o
at
Q
9 o z8
13
5 �
u
6 f L4 2S 2I
f
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
day of
1979 '
�tiyCer
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
� Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9437 I �/
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. t
CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY .F SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Q
1
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
1919
ty erR
LEGEBD
— Assessment District Boundary
•+� Landscaping Area
T I TRACT 9444 I lZ
uU +.p..0 tu.1 >tu
IWO"
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
1919
ty erR
LEGEBD
— Assessment District Boundary
•+� Landscaping Area
T I TRACT 9444 I lZ
uU +.p..0 tu.1 >tu
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.I
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
� /
q f0 19 JI
261291 SV 23 122 21 120 I /0 1/0 117 I /i I N
3
k a
L 3 � Q
L 8 B /I a
N
Filed in the Offi =e of the City Clerk ,rpcR /eeio
this _ day /f
1979
C [yCer
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
TRACT 9445 1 /3
411 ��ynfp ICL 3".1
13;1
136
30 31 33 it
T3 amm60NOr
*
RYE. 3/
N
w f3
70
Si
6i V
y
.a.
w to
S/
c
D!
51 60
u n
56 57
32
V
33
ARCH /6P.LD
NVENYC
261291 SV 23 122 21 120 I /0 1/0 117 I /i I N
3
k a
L 3 � Q
L 8 B /I a
N
Filed in the Offi =e of the City Clerk ,rpcR /eeio
this _ day /f
1979
C [yCer
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
TRACT 9445 1 /3
411 ��ynfp ICL 3".1
a
W
Q
Z
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I A f
f3 1
1° y
y9 1
10 f
f9 30 F; t0
t `
30 i
it y
y0
4/ !
!a >/ 18
y A n
n 1
19 o
o n
n y
yt F
F s
sl >: 0 11
v 0 !
!s n
n V
Vt t
t! 4
4 3
3s 33 1�, t6
3 s
s/ s
sr v
vl y
yr N
N St is
6 L
LA
VINE l
lr -Rosr
1±11 Q IN 11 I! II 0' 1! 01jEFH 21
�.�. •n.•.n rnw¢ H. n 61W
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day of
1979
ty Clerk
Nr UVMNp mmmm
LEGEND
Assessment District Boundary
•�� Landscaping Area
TRACT 9454 1 14
�oeoao0m
TRACT 9472 1 l5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
20
2/
22
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
24
23
2fi
17
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
/9
!7
!G
/S
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
/O
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
L
q
O
C
�
0
!6
m
.+
5J 52 !7
JS
L q
o <
5< 31 is
34
a
W Eyc n
SS j 30 39
;
33
W N y
J N N
Q
N e
SG 49 +O
.S
a J
S7 48 41
!/
I\V
I VV
Jfi O <7 +2
W
30
59 Z a6 A
J
29
Sr
...
i
GO <3 «
28
HEATHER
ST
u
a
r
Y
v
0
uw
— o
W
u
T
%t
vq
u
RING
AVE
W
N O\
W
_�
���
,
o,
/9'" ST _
_
�oeoao0m
TRACT 9472 1 l5
/9
20
2/
22
2!
24
23
2fi
17
/9
!7
!G
/S
/a
/O
�oeoao0m
TRACT 9472 1 l5
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Filed in the Office of the City Clerk
this day Of
1919
City er
LEGEND
— Assessment District Boundary
Landscaping Area
I TRACT 9480 1 16
• drtnber 1 I479
CM OF RANCHO lUt'.14U \ ^.A
CITY COUNr IL MINUTI'S
Nc,p,lar 4ec[ing
I, I P, ORDER
r .veting of the City CnuacLI was held In till muI[I- purp,.ac room of
I, muntary School, 7105 Ctrnallan Street, Rancho Cunmonga, cn Wednesday,
:uh,•r 1, 1979 The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p n b•• Mayor lames C
:r,,4t wo led in the pledge of allegiance to the ling
C I'rrsent: Councilmen Schlosser, Mikels, Polombo, Bridge and Mayor Frost Also
,,n•sent •avre staff members: City Manager Wasserman, City Attorney Robert Dougherty,
t,a atant U ty Manager Robinson, Community Development Director lam, City Engineer
Flnince Director Empey, Community Services Director Molloy
Appr, +v a n: !minutes of August 16, September 8, and September 19, 1979 Motion:
'L,eod by 1'110mbo, seconded by Schlosser to approve all three sets of minutes Motion
,arried r0
• _ _t:10USC0IENTS
I NLiliam Lyon Company presentation of the Victoria Plan proposal for Etivando to
he he LJ In the Elementary School in Etiwunda on October 4, 1979 at 7:00 p m
h. Advtsory Committee meeting on October 18 at 6 70 p m in the Library Conference
Roos.
Ili,torical Commission meeting on October 16 at 7:00 p m. in the Library Con -
f,•renco Room.
J On Oorober JO there will be a Blood Drive at Chaffey College from 10 a M. to 2 p.m.
1. .t�,l :ding Official, Jerry Grant, has been appointed by the Board of Directors of
t 1 International Conference of Building Officials to the Research Committee
Cnnncllman Bridge suggested that the staff report Item 6 -A be deleted from the
+,,•+ , ,,J tnat rll groups interested In the fireworks issue meet vltn the Advisory
" tt.•,• to work out a satisfactory agreement flavor asked if anyone in the
e,J,, n, mould oppose such a meeting No one wns in opposition
" K Ln,: Mnved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to delete Item from the agenda and
••r the Advisory Committee to resolve a solution between all groups interested
+•+ (r.•w. +rks Issue Motlon carried 5 -0 The groups would meet on Novecbvr 1 at a
I I•, ro ec announced at a later time All interested persens would be rOntnct,d
• _ 'tt 6,•Is reported he had been attending the SCAC General Asacmbl, meetings which
.err ,., In process (October 7 -4) He reported that the SLAG Executive Committee had
vnders;d the plar implementing the SCAG '78 Forecast Polley
•, Sta I renuested the m, -ttng be adjourned to an executive session to discuss some
I'. uJ l m: litigation.
LS_ ,_OLDIII.EG REPORTS.
Advlsury Committee - cstabltghed the meeting for the fireworks Issue for November 1
Illatorical Commission - none
City Council HLnutcc
October 1. 19'9
PaRe
L
t. cOSSFNT C%I.I.NDAR.
I Lppr,.val of warranty - register NO 79 -10 -1 - S229,604 85
It Rvtvr ,la1m against the city by Steve Aexch. ^ nn to the City Attorney for
handling Ammit •f claim unknown at the time
[,•t pt.bllc hearing for October 17 for an ordinance establishing a Design
Revi,•w Cnmmlttce and criteria for architectural review of developments within
tl e City at Rancho Cucamonga.
d Request authorization to open escrow proceedings for the purchase of
r
Parcel L of Heritage Park Purchase price - $83,853 00; funds are included
In current budget from the Park Development Fund
V Release of the following bonds:
Tract 9121: Accepr roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes
Located on the southwest corner of 19th Street and Haven
Performance bond (road) $140,000
Performance bond (water) 43,000
Performance bond (sewer) 25,000
Tract 9245: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Ilona
Located cn the west side of Haven between 19th Street
and Soutiern Pacific Railroad tracks.
Performance bond (road) $122,000
Tract 9324: Accept roads and release bonds to Griffin Development Co
Located on the south side of Hillside Road between Jasper
Street and Carnelian Street
Performance bond (road) $26x,000
Performance bond (water) 36,000
Tract 9421: Accept roads and ro'case bond to Fox Hollow Limited Partnership
Located on the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Amethyst St
Performance bond (road) $ 90,000
Tract 9422 -2: Accept raads and release bond to Marlborough Development Corp.
Located on the vest side of Turner Avenue south o° Church Street
Performance bond (road) $162,000
f ,Ward bid for four 4 -door Ford Fairmounts to Citrus Motors The city
hag been notified that Arena Ford cannot meet the bid whicF was approved by
Council on 9 -19 -79 It is, therefore, recommended that the bid be awarded
to 'he second Lowest bidder, Citrus Motors, at a total coat of $23.949.15,
and to accept a letter of withdrawal from Arena Ford
g. Request to participate in a Deferred Compensation Program for Rancho
Cucmonga employees
RESOLUTION NO 79 -79
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THP CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTINw V DIPLOYEES'
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND AUTHORIZING WE
CXFCUIION OF AGREEMENTS RELATED TO SAID PLAI.
Cit Louncll Minutes
Ortoher 1, 1979
Page 1
b lr ra p ;am c el Parcel .`lap 5044 Till- Parcel Map was tentatively approved us
`I ,v , 1.719.
r RESOLUTION PO 79 -78
I A RESOLVIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMO.NGA, CAI IFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 5044 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 80. 5044),
5, PURL)C UF.ARINCS.
S.S. An Ordinance cstablishlnT the Residential Growth )LInaeocnt Plan.
On St•ptembor 19, the City Council dlscusacd various issue. nod alternatives to
the Plan and directed staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce, Building Industry
Assaciatton, and all other concerned citizens to try to resolve the remaining Issues
of the Plan Staff had met wlrb the groups Jack Inn presented the staff revert
A letter had been received Iran the Chamber of Commerce which Mr I.= raad as
• follows:
'The doard of Directors requeats that consideration of the Residential Growth Manage -
rent Ordinance and Residential Assessment System Resolution be continued to the
9nvenaer 7, 1979 meeting of the Council
We .tae requescing the further delay for the following reasons:
' The magnitude of the changes ✓filch staff to recommending, the unusual areas of con-
cern �us.h ,ame to light during the extensive Chamber Growth Management study c=itt.a
- cetings and the need for more detailed and concentrated Input from the Building
Industry "soclation and the Realty Board with the Chamber of Commerce "
4a,or suggested perhaps the Council might want to table consideration of the growth
management plan until after the completion of the General Plan
Pnlamho -oncurred with the request for the extension of time
l
L
'fottol: 4oved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to continue first reading of
Irli-lance Yu 86 and consideration of Pwsolutlon No 79 -74 to November 7, 1979
t h Cnanril meting
arldge expressed that the Council should wait until the City was further along in
,thor malor plenning efforts He asked Mr Lea for his input.
4r Lan stated the main Issue to be resolved was the overcrowding in the schools.
la use original draft of the growth management plan, It was written that there
vould by no development applications submitted until there had been a resolution
of the •school lmpactlon problem. However, the current draft of the plan refects a
rl,anga• after meting with developers and that vas applications Could be received,
r.•vl.•ved, nod approved, but remain subject to a solution to the impaction problem.
Ilkrls asked for clarification of Sections 4 -S In the Ordinance. Mr Lam stated this
r.•Irrs to lots with multiple zoning
4..vnr asked If anyone In the audience objected to continuing the reading of the
nrdlnanrr to the November 7 meeting There were no objections.
4erlon by Palonbo, seconded by Schlosser to continue the meetlnR carried by the
follmdne, vote: AYES: Schlosser, Ilkels, Palombo, Bridge NOFS: Frost. ABSENT:
':one
Cltv Connell MLnutev
0vtr4, r 1 1979
p uo ,
0
-,t l n.. L.,rat lsn ad Zen, Ch_,nal Y. -- 74 -08, _ 4cri ll m ,,.n »t nu [tun.
.n,• tram A -I I lnl ted ,grty Il titre t,. 4 -- c4r tvv Ind•..trin l) nrr 38 ,e
r.. nJ lo, arod nn the nurt,, Ild,- nl A•-.+w I,pr. xlwdtrly 1300 It ut east of
rho PI nu. ing Ce.,mly tto. n•, .... aud,.l tI,,, fh•• t Iry ,u..m 11 adopt
approvtog the [,.nun., n, , '..,;.•[Ise ne, larvrrlon tad L,no Chance
r 1, r rrporl by Jac k I.am.
.. tttn_ v w „pined for public hunting
. ^1,,•. •n,v of file title amerce of the property and representing David
,• -.k, In support of lhr zone charge lie sfttrd he wished the r,co•d Ind L•
rt: ', .,pnein•d and supported the Issuance of a negative declaration and
,pnro:•.,l •1 the zone change
Oar p-0,10 t,Arirg was closed
It 1.•n: leved by Schlosser• seconded by Mikcls to approve Ordinance No 88, set
d. n,nrr or second reading. and waive entire reading Motion carried by
•.I I•vlu .,in: AYES: Schlosser. Mlkels, Palombo, Bridge. Frost NOES: None
tit ,• nW number read by Raesertman
ORDINANCF.:30. 88 (first reading)
At. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF r-J:CHn CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZCNINC ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMEl 229- 021 -59 FWIM A -1 TO IL -2 FOR
38 56 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW
1300 FEET FAST OF INTERSTATE 15
;,_ d,••p..wt Inc an Ordinance estaSltshlna a RA1cho ClInuonga Advisory Commt sIon. I
:hv Aav1.1ry Committee recon: mended Ordinance %o. 87 be referred to the City Council
•r ,•,,I N- ratfun The ordinance Includes a statement on the gonerel role of the -
,•�,1..•r• I*'- tsston, composition of membership, terms if appointment, removal of
.•mb,•r +. -"rings. officers• and minute taking Staff report by Jim Robinson
r LI _.• .t rt.d that Council Fact received a letter requesting that the Coevmittee
r••i' t
m,t from some of the industrial groups and service organizations instead
1•'1,, r homeowners' at IF He felt that perhaps Council should consider
J
t .,t opened for public hearing
I vi, fated the Committee rep- esented homeowners whose interest was In the
' .1 ms that the gro4p should comprise only of citizens who are Interested
i ,r I -•mlty
- dt,r•r, e. +•rn stated tLat mot on the Committee also worked In the community
•
r ntv t v- -r. President of the Chamber of Comerrt, read the following from a letter
.ut• h , W ...... n sent to the Council:
•':r i request of the Board o1 Directors that when vacant Les occur on the
1.Iv1 r •- att[ee cnneiderat inn h given to appllnt Lny at least one lndustrlal7
°-••r. i,I riented fndiviJual to each of the geographic units within the
I
.••„Its
,,•n rvr Wvi +ory Lommlttee mccber stated he Imd not been at the meeting when
L
'n ..•, 4W been di,cnxscd III- c,•t,incd to tie. Council his opinions on the
nO.tri.•q .n the committee
City Council Minutes
Ortoher 3, 1979
pace 5
.II ring wn+ , lowed
`I t,.,r W, .o 1,,otsentw roijard(nr the ord In in, v lie stated tent Scrtion I
s,: I r 1 L, t Clio L...m, IL's urinlnat lntrnL to mike tiro gcopraphl, boundaries by
i, •A. not by Lomunit, name Svrtion : -- he [,'It that pvrhaps the term
1 Lry br ton lung.
I. +„ r vtnred to continue the item sv he Mould have time t„ luok Into the
I, r n,v hotween "committee" and "commission' Liun•n W.tssrrman stated that thu
L..a,.rn -i,•nt tode did not spell out any differences in the two terms However. most
rrl,•. .sod the term "commission" when a group functioned Independently and made
Lrts Env arart from the Councilt such as the Planning Commission and historical
.-als „Ire
`lut:vn: `loved by Hikele, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No 87 with
tb, Tome using rip codes to identify the three corrrunitiea, It October 17 for
+,•,ond r,•ading, and waive the entire reading Motion carried by following vote:
A1'LS: S,hI,+sser, Hlkels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost NOES: Mans Title and
nr:,er r, id by Wasseman
ORDINANCI' "0 87 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
a RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CREATING AM ADVISORY
COMMISSION TO ACT IN A'7 ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE
CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
'_ rtlun of o nortfon of Banvan Street -Tract 9444. Report by Lloyd Hubbs.
second pt. r of abandonment of a portion of Banyan Strtet from Amethyst
t•' r easterly The area to be abandoned is being replaced by relocation of
rough the t act developed of Tract No 9444
hived by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No 79 -77
m r, the vacation of a portion of Banyan, and to waive entire reading
:+I .pened for public hearing
•n: mswered the question which had been raised by C'uncll as to who the
r •. rt ,wners were to the north and south On the northerly side the property
. i 4v Nark III Hcaos To the south, the owner was Mr Bruebaker, a lemon
I,: hearing vas closed
•t, t I drlage and seconded b, Palombc, to approve the Resolution was approved
I.• ,Ilnwtng vote: AYES: Srhlosser Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost
A Inc Wasserman read t(tle and number
RESOLUTION NO. 79 -77
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COC'IrL; OF IHE CITY
OF RARCHU CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF
SAY BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALITORNIA, ORDERING
TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS
L SHOWN ON A MAP (NO. V -003) ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE rTTy OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
ITY_LVYAGER'S STAFF RCPORTS
b.A. Ciyuest from Advtsory Committee Lor Ret.cal of Ord lnnnce No 78 provtdtne for
etc +a 1.• of Sa& and 5anc fireworks [[cm had been deleted t•om [ha Agenda earlier
In Elie neeting and had been referred back to the Advisory Committee to meet with
,Ll persons intec•sted Meeting would be held an November 1 at a place to be
mnoun „•d later
City Connell Minutes
t. it her 1. 1970
it 14L, M1
au. d••rnv_, 1.
..11. •,I ,ntrar t „r ,ervl„v. witb MgCg .. 1(,- 11 _3 u_
`Lea•1 Ire Elio illy of Ran. hn Wraronga ,fail npnrt by Ia.k I.im
It •7 It id h ...... .ontinuod from Elio &•p4•1hrr P) Utv t'nnnrll _ ,,ting In order
that It m:r+ b,• made In the ont rart Ch in . e had 1,,,n wdc ds r,quruted
Astor n.,,l It anvnne In the mdlence vl 1•ed to rrspond to Lids Item There was
no n•. ram ve
`lotion: `loved by Palumbo• seconded by Schlosser to approve the contract with
NKOg t•i prepare a Fiscal Irpact Model and authorize the ma,or to sign agreements
Nit dun .arried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels, Palumbo, Bridge,
and Frost NOES: None
M1C. _x,•rLn._t authorization to update Tolephonu System In City Hall. Staff report
by harry E:mpey
f`tc present phone system being used in City hall is now too small To improve
the +vvtem, it would cost $2,320 60 to install This would provide 16 outside
trunk linen ( prenently there are ten) and 80 internal stations (presently
thvrt are forty). It was recommended that the budget item under the City Hall
fun,tlon :or the alarm system be redesignated to update Lhe phone .yPtem. •
ALao, it was recoxendea to approve $454 35 from the contingency fund to provide
an addition of twenty new stations instruments with a conference system for the
Shorltt'v Department
Bridge asked if the Sheriff could lease a line to San Bernardino to cut down the
dung distance calls Captain Vickum responded by stnting in :uiv they had
L,•ased one line to San Bernardino and in October they would be leasing the
second line
Motion: `loved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the updating of the
phone s,stoci for the cost of $2,320 60 and to approve $454 35 from the contingency
fund tor additions to the Sheriff's phone system Motion carried ty following vote:
AYES: S,hlo9scr, Mikols, Palumbo, Bridge, and Frost NOES: None
ttD. i,.ditlonal widening and street improvements on Baseline between Beryl and
!ton it T eets Staff report by Lloyd Hobbs
No don Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the widening and street
iiprovcn, -nts on Baseline between Beryl and Lion and allocating the sum not to
,•s.ved 5.900 for the design contract Motion carried by the following vote:
%Yi S: S, I,losser, Mlkels, Palonbr, Bridge, and Frost NOES: None
hF_ for royal of the replacement, betterment and common use agreement for •
brld4v .onstructlon in connection with the Cucamonga and Demers Creek I
lip nn.•ment prolecte. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs IIII`
Mr Bubhs reported the date on page 4 of cite contract should be November 1, not
October 1.
Motion: Moved by Palomoo, seconded by Mlkels to approve the execution of
Elie igrcetont and authorize the expenditure of $82.613 as detailed in the
agrvement Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mlkels,
Paloaoo• Bridge, and Fr..st NOES: None
L
nF._ 9tall`Lng g.•onmmcndatlan_ Staff report by Inek Lim.
City Council ][notes
drtaber 1, 1979
Page 7
'Ir lam rcu>mm,,,Jud that the posLtlon of Community Development Technic L.tn that
Il,ld h „•n btulgutod not he lill,d ind that the Grads appropriated for that
,uvltlon lie u+ed to employ an additional l,•rk t•tptst to nsatst In proretising
the I rtle volume of worlt in the Community Development Department
It %.t+ tlso trquosted that one additional Building Inspector be employed by the
.wilding Ltvislen
Hot inn: ]oved I.y Palomba, seconded by Nikels to approve the rc,uest to hire
the .lerk typist Instead of the Community Development Technician and to approve
'be hiring or another building inspector to Include a vehicle and equipment
It t n tl cost of $22,875 !lotion carried by the following vote: AYES:
`•:i l.. + +e r, hikelo, Palumbo, Bridge and Frost. NOES: None
I. .iTY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none
S. WU BUSINESS.
I `L,.nr was appointed to represent the Council on a committee to Interview
consultants for the master plan for storm drains
b `lavnr asked if Caltrans had been contacted to replace the eucalyptus trees
which thou had removed on Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Nubbs stated they had and
Caltraus would be replacing them once the city was in a position to malntair
them.
'like Palumbo would be attending the Edison Company's Nuclear briefing on
Thursday, October 4
J Bridge gave a brief presentation on the decrease of the nuroer of unoccupied
hones in recent months within the city of Rancho Cut (merge
9. NdOURMHENT.
`lotion: !loved by Palumbo, seconded by Nlkels to adjourn the meeting The
:orlon <arrted by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Nlkels, Palomba drldge
ua Fro +t The meeting adjourned at 9:07 p m. to an executive session.
Trio .•xecutivo session adjourned at 9:35 p.m to the next regular meeting of
Octolwr 17, 1979
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly uthe le
Deputy City Clark
L