Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/11/07 - Agenda Packet
AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School Multi- Purpose Room 7105 Carnelian November 7, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS_ -- NOTE A 1 rt"s subm,ett•d fn, thr• utu t'eu•. Ir ariend., rusr t, rn w• r r ury Th, d• rd; nn• t, c•r'•m r m l l r.r, is , nd 1 ^ .. un thr Thursety prior t• rh•• .•r dnJ thirr Nrtlrsd.ry ,f «r.h mn+th the riry t' /r•k', otth, r. . r rs r11 .su h hens 1 CALL TO ORDER A. PLEDGE TO FLAG B ROLL CALL' Mikels _&_, Palom �_X, SScchlosser ,C Bri,ige�_, Frost_. C APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 17, Tg79 i • : ANNOUIICEMENJS a Council b Stiff 3 COMMITTEE REPORTS a Advisory- Goerrit-tee b Historical Cum''ission 4 CONSENT CALE11OAR rlu r hoot .7 t.ons•m .r'rrnn rtes, ire rrprrted hr M• tour rnr rrtd non-.++ntm•, rsr r. They Url' 1+' .J,tt.d ep.n by rho t,u.s it at •ne tin r,•lrinlf lr,ru „nrr+ Any taunt it n•mhr•r, stint mt•mhr, it urtr rr "nil perry Wry mvpu.•,t rhr, ,, item be nnn•ed tr.., th,- t'ons••nt C- 111 -10.81 r , r rr.•r ,1 , ussrvn a Appieval of Warrants Register No 79- 11 -07; for $246,466 &a 1_ It Refer claim against the City by Marlene A Parks to the City _ 3 Attorney for handling. Amount of Claim is $56 G8 C Refer claim against the City by (The Estate of) Frank Jame. 6 Renouillo to the City Atto -ney for handling Ar'ount of Claim -- is 52,000,000 OO t 1 n• 4 In nsent 1 aln Ida n P .wt unm r A-,-ho, izatif.., to Atfpwl Ill it... ,to Tr an,t —tAt inn f vidssion Prot Intl Authorization is rriuosted 'or the City In7loeer to nt end the qpv Wither• meeting of the (,it ifo, MA TtnnsPm tatinn fn••unscion In rn lo<e if np. r• sp, the statu9 Of ore f .mire I Fr evil I 'turfy roy be dT't n• re. At that r•eotin9 e It is Ieeev. •t..rat I deft the Deputy City Cleft br` anth•n Izpd to _8 attend a Mork•h-y• 1m city rlerks on rriday, 'IOYIvd`e' Ifi, and Saturday, tiov.�ter IJ The ^ost to tho I I t y is Appi n, b•vately S'S Funds a, a ava 11 61 In the ( I tv IlAn.a•pn s •em run' and Naval acUVm' f CnC ro••onl the u,••.e Pl t.v.dAnfe�Nd(leo•il IPII:.0 '•f f't 1n5 Annual font .. ..... r Aillim izatt•`n ra te,i- ` t•`I for the eelyor to attend lit. Annual eonferen[e of tho tlitlr•nal Leaqun of fiti-s tit las vegan, _ IlrvadA Move, In" 24 Ibn that the fit. is a � mbn- of the flatinnat Ielnne of I1•ies it is approln late if At w loin Pain an dltave'Ole rn •he , glnization Alv`nt ,,true to be considered At the annual IOnfeu•n- e ate futfne of rnue slaving the block giant promarP, lnd similar ite ... s of concern to o:, cotmunity • H Aut ho. %L`t ion hI .1.1i• r tI.e Im I itfnaI fonshm ltwo q Reque.t author lzat fell to advet ti se fnr bids for r'`n eonstrur tion of h-a f is s m I I s It FisoI file end Het Irmo Avenue .,nd At Church Street awn A„ Irlbald Avenue Constru'tion ulll tun fu.ided 100 th,ounh FAIT fnndlnu It Reduce speed IWit on Hi'lbland Avenue lo_ It Is rcrixivend0 that a 35 TWIT speed zone should be established to make rada, spped enfr•(eme , possible -.yno parkinu mill` shnuld also be established Uunugh the nation poi Uan gfrelr au isphalt ctlrb prevents vehicles from lw kino off It., •aann ry I Tar, 9194 Attept Pettis and release bond I., It 1 •I file opt time'[ .n1 nr`t of A'.ow Route And I•,.Mr Avenue (kalm A'nold D Anderson Performance Bond (Road) $30,000 (Surety) RESOLUTIONI Ito 70 ill A RESOLUTION OF T,IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAIICHO CUCAiMCA, 13 CALIFORNIA, TO ESMBLISII SPEED LIMIT Oil HIGHLAW AVENUE TO 35 HPh BETWEEN WIETHIST SIPEET AND ARCHIBALD AVEIRIE ( rt, r,wn it fq.,nJa 1 Ilnva +hrr 1019 4 Consent Calendar (continued) Tract 9426 Release of bonds located on the north side of Hillside Road, west of Turquoise Avenue Amer Crowell /Lwenthal, Inc Performance Bond (water) S32,000(surety) Tract 9422 -1 Release of Bonds Located on the east side of Romona Avenue, south of Church Street Owner. Dtarlborough Deselopoent Corporation Perform nce Bond (sewer) $52,000(surety) Perfnrmance Bond (water) $59,000 (surety Tract 9596 Accept Roads and Release Bonds Located on the east side of Carnelian Street, north of Panyan Street Drmer Gary till her Performance Bond (road) $92,060 (surety) Perforrance Bond (water) 511,000 (surety) Tract 9595 Acfoct Roads and Release Bonds Located on the northeast orner of Carnelian Street and Banyan Street Owner Gary tliller Perfornunce Bond (road) $104,000 (surety) Tract 9575 ArcPpt Roads and Release Bonds Located northwest of the irtersection of Turner Avenue and Arrow Route at Placer Street Owner Arnold 0. Anderson rerfmmenie Bond (road) S56-000 (surety) Performance Bond (water) $38,000 (surety) Periorma nce Bond (sewer - on -site) $39,000 (surety) rrr fmi� +mu P Bond (serer - uff- site)$ 9,000 (surety) Tract 9448 Release of Bonds Located on the southwest corner of Beryl and Banyan Streets ® Owner Fteeker Development Company Landscape and Irrigation Bond S101000 Block Hall Bond $10,000 l il. it i n,.. I hu - .hr•r 1, I'1 /'1 4 t Caier dar (c Ontimu'di • Ze ract 9,7 4 Retease rf Bonds Located on the test •Ide of Veltman Avenue, north of Arrnw 4nute Owner. II.J. Brock and Snns Rlotk Wall Rerfonnance Bend 5252,000 Ira,t 0256 Rrlease of Bonds Located on the northeast turner of Beryl Street and Hflisfde Road Owner R L `fevers and Sons, Inc fesh 8om1 for fence Removal and $300 no Street Repair Tract 9301 Release of Bonds Located adjacent and east of Hermosa Avenue, north of Lemon Avenue Owner Lesney Development Company Landscaping Bond SI6,000 1, art fill A,tept Roads and Release Bond, Lo ated south of Wilson Street and east of Ifer,rosa Avenue Owner Lesney Development Company Labor and Material bond (road) $68,000 labor a,.d 113terfal bond (eater) $20,000 Labor and Material bond (sewer) $2(1,500 Tract 9521 Release of Bonds located mi the west side or Archibald Avenue, nuith of Hit sides Road flunor Lewis Hanes perfoimance Bond (water) $60,000 Iract 9382 Release of bonds Located on the soutriwest corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road Omer Lesney Development Company ? Landscaping Bond $32,000 .i 4 Consent Calenda, (c•)ntinuedl e Tract 9305 Accept Replacement Bonds Located on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Monte Vista Owner The Jones Company Performance Bond (road) 5152,000 (Old Bond) Tract 0305 Release of Bonds Located on the northeast corner of Hermsa Avenue and Monte Vista O,nrer The Jones Company Labor and Material Bond (sewer) $21,500 Lahor and Material Bond (water) $25,000 Tract 9240 Release of Bonds Located north of Banyan Street and west of Hellman Avenue Owner Prado H000s Corporation Cash Staking Bond Sj60 00 • Parcel dap 3382/4693 - Release of Bonds Located at 19th and Sapphire Streets owner VanguarJ Con•panies Cash Bond - Labor and Paternal S 6,043 89 Kreet lonrovements k. Parcel flap 4411 /Minor Subdivision 77 -0449 - Rell,lse Certificate located on the west side of Wnethyst Street, north of Banyan Street Owner Delbert Stonebraker of BPposit $3.500 00 ,ne {too J1a�d63 p\Certificate (Agrecwcnt Extension) _23 1PL1'GC1 rue to problems that have verbally been expressed to the Engineering staff, it is recommended that Council 1 Eliminate the sidemtik requirement 2 Approve a 6 month extension on the agreement 3 Require an Increase in the deposit to current costs. n L City (ouncil Agenda 6- No rmber 7, 1979 4 Consent Calendar (continued) At the end of 6 months time, if progress to complete the improvements !s unsatisfactory, we recommend Council take acticn to call the bond and have the work performed in igszrdarce hith the Conditions of approval I m Parcel Flap 5269 (approval) Approve Parcel 'tap of / 33 4 lots[ North of hillside anj ast of Carnellan, consi Ling of 5 a, res ZWLP: Oevelotier, IIAS Propefties, has supplied the ty with uritles err ffic lent Ida nature to q irantee in tallation required s eet im ovements fornonre (Let of Credit) 0 00 00 or and Ititeria (Letter of C, edit) $4 ,500 00 RESOLUTIOti NO 9 -90 34 A RESOLUtI0t1 F THE C11 COUNCIL OF Ti CITY OF NCHO CUC 0 LIFORUTA, AP OVIIIG PARC L IIAP NU;IO 5269, (TEUTATI'1E N1 @LGA, ARCEL IIAP ILO -0590) IMPROVEMENT AGR MENT, AND IIIPROYLiIENT SECURITY n General Dian Amendment No 79 -03D - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A rhange fro,.) the present designating of low Density Iesidential to Medimn Density Residential for proprrty bounded by Red H111 Cnunt+y flub drive, Tapia Via, Rancheria Drive and San Bernardino Road For Publir hra,inn before the City Council on December 5, 1979 n General Plan A emtmerrt No 79 -03E - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A Lhanue fre,n the present designation of mediw, density residential to lo+ dersfly residential for proprrty tooted on the northwest g Or'ne- of Baseline and Haven For public hearing before the City Cnuncil on December S. 1979 P General Plan Ammndment No 19 -031 - City of Rancho Cucamonga - A Change from the present designation of Low Density Residential to [tedium Density pnsidrntial for property beginning at a pofi,t ' 660' west of Haven on the north side of Daspline and extending approximately 670' along Baseline and extending north to the Pacific E!eLtrir Railroad right -of -way covering approximately r,. 20 6 act" of land YFor public hearfna before the City Council on December 5, 1979 her ,, 1979 • 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS A- An Ordinance establishing a Oeslyn Review Committee and criteria 36 for architectural review for development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga - PPpart by fact-Lim. The ordinance creates a Des,y11 Review Committee consisting of two Planning Commission milers and the Director of Com,unfty Develop- ment or his decignre The committee will r ,q twice monthly as needed The time and ulace for the meetings h 11 be establlahcd by a Re,olutfon of the Planning Commission The ordinance alsu sets forth criteria which the committee will use Le reviewinq the design of a project ORDINANCE NO 89 (second readinq) 40 All ORDINANCE Or TIIE City COUNCIL nr THE IITY ni RAOICI10 CUCANIrIGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A DESIGN REVIEW rRnfEUURE WOIfW ESTABLISIIES A DESIGN REVIEh cnMIITTEE AND DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA P An Ordfi,ance Pstahl Esh lnq rrqulatiens pertain,ng to the playing 45 Of 1111190 Tn tho Lily of Ranchq CUtamnrloa Report ty Ilarry OCovey B,ngo T,as heen der I.I,ed Iegal fir the State of faltfnrora, and the State dons .nt forth basic requirements for c0nductfnq bingo games This „ hmance nstabl lshes regulations for bingo games to help prevent ilie9al games from taking place in the city nnppl,ULE 110 90 (second readingl 46 All 0R'll N4NtF of ',if city rounclL Of III[ iITY PI RA'ILIIO (l1C71lllN4A CALIFORNIA rROVIDMG FOR ThE FLIGIBEIITY OF •,0 RFGI,LAf10•'IS PERTAINING TO THE rIAYI'IG 11 RINGO WI91fN hfi ,.Iri nl RAN010 CUCANCNGA C An Ordinance r•.tahlrshinq the Residential growth Wanagenent 5'T PTan Report by lack Lam First rr,idit -q nr file ,ndni.,nce was contfnurd film file n, fober i, I fnteesre% m•etmg to ""'w sluff the time to m•et and work with trd grnnbs an:f fmllvidunit to refine the Growth Ftmage- ment Plan Partinp , . Of these mnetinq% inrluded ropresenta- lives of the Building Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce, and Board of Realtors flany IsCOCS had frlen resnlve,d from these renting; However, the one remaining issue before Council is the establishment of the date of first al,erication submittals The Own alterna tive tri- annual review periods and corresponding submittal dates for eonsiderati,;n are City Cuu,it I Agenda -8- November 7, 1979 Alternative I Review Period 1 Hay 1 - August 31 Application Ming period May I - flay 31 Review resod 2 September 1 - December 31 Application filing period September I - Septemher 30 Review Period 3 Januaty I - April 30 A- pplication (ding period January 1 - January 31 Alternative 2 Review Pe,,nd August 1 - November 30 APplicat,ot. I.;!ng period August 1 - August 31 Revtew Period 2 December 1 - Ilar,h 31 Appliratle•n Filing Period December 1 - December 31 Recommendatl n It%�is`recbimiended the City Council select an application sulmtittal date and adopt Ordinance No. 86 and Re-nlution Flo 79 -74 . ORDI'IAICE NO 86 (first readingl 56 'AN ORDINAhrf OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE City OF RIRNCHO CUCA4O11GA, IALIFOP.NIA, ESTADLISHigS A 1,k0'API MA'IAGEMENI PLAII 10 REGUTATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 111 THE CITY OF RAtICHO CUCAMONGA. RESPLUT 0!1 110 79 65 A RES01.1ITl94 or 114E (ITV COUNCIL ' F TILE C11v OF RAIICRO C11CA'i0VA. CAL If ORNIA. ISTARt ISit T,, A RE; i PEN IAt ASSESS('ENI US"M FOR REVICW OF FESIDENTIAI DE'VELOPMfdf IN THE CITY OF RA11Cd3 CUCAfhCtlGA. D Publt, Rearing R- garding t''e establislment of Landscape 84 Maintenance District No ! RCltort by Lloyd tWbbs - At the Octoto, 17, 1979 (fly council meettno, the Council gave prelimina,y al'D, oval of the E„9lneer Pnport, and passed the Pesnlution of Intention to for Landscape Flainten- ance Vistri,t Ito I Recommendation- After rereiving public input and if the Council still wishes to torn this Di,trict, it is recentnended that Council approve Resolution Ho 79 -fill ordering the District formation RESOLUTION NO. 79 -89 86 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of IIIE CITY OF MICRO CU'WiONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORK 14 C(RIIIECTION wl Tll rORHATIDN Of LANDSCAPE MAINIENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 City Counn 1 Agenda flovemb, r 7, 1979 • 6 CITY FWtIAGCR'S STAFF REFORIS A Consideration of a reguet to hold the November ely1979 _ 88 Tty Council eting at---t-he- _ Helghborhood Center - Report by iiMHol ey On November 21 the City Council will be conducting a hearing for the renaming of streets n the southea•.t section of the City of Rancho Cucamonga it has been sugyested that perhaps holding the meeting in the area would be helpful in getting the local residents involved in this Recommendation It is, therefore, recommended that the November 21, 1979 Clty Council meeting be held in the Rancho Cucaf,ponga Neighborhood Center located at 9791 Arrow (' �nuest_for an adjustment in the SB -201 fees for Central 89_ School District - Report Ty Sack -lam. Central School District has requested an additional $e56.105 in school fees to the original 5200,000 previously requested in February 1979 If Council concurs in an in,rease In SB -201 fees for the Central' 5010(11 District, then Ordfna,•ce No 69 must be amended by approving Ordinance 6q B ORDINAIICE NO 69 -B (urgency) _ 96 All OPnIf1ANCE OF tRE City COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANi'nf 'OCAf1O'TA, CALIFOPNIA, ArLUDING SECTIO14 O OF OROIVI E NO hf AS AMENDED Of ORDIANHCE NO 69 -A nil, -II PERTAINS TO PIE FINANCING Of INTERIff SCPJOL 'gClLlri F;, TO INCREASE FEES THEREUNDER, AIID TO IRnVITE FOP THE DEUICATION OF LAND IN LIEU THLREOF, IND Df LLARINC THE URGEIICY THEREOF C An appeal of Planning Commission action for d request of waiver _ 97 c, conditions of approval for the property located ' 300' west of the ,evilr Ireew.,y un file south side of I oothr l l'Bnolevard kn,fmsaaBtavvr b„ldinn SupaLL¢S. deport by Jack Lam _! _for a hearr „g b ere Council_ fo�lproperty located at 1ng_ erry Ytreci in P o tucamonga VPTr,vnrt 1T ]er "ry Plant City Council Aqenda .10 flove -ber 7, 1979 • E Request for financial assistance for the Alcohol Education 119 Prouram. keport by tauren Gasser w - The Alcohol Education Program, Inc. has requested financial assistance in the amount of S1355 in order to PPawle the organization to continue its programs in the Next End The amount requested of the City of Rancho Cucamorga represents approximately 5 percent of the funds necessary to continue the program. Until incorporation, the services were provldii to residents of our community without charge At that tiro, however, the organization was rereivinq a higher level of financial assistance from the County from tee CEIA program and also from other communities In the Hest End Requests for assistance have been suhmittcci to all of the cities in the West E.id of San Bernar,lino County A rein esentative frost the Alcohol Education Program will be in atterdance at the City Council meeting to explain further the needs of the organization If the Council wishes to appiep, late funds to bola support the organization, the appropriation may he made from tie contingency account • f Citizen participation for the_Geneiai. Plan Report by Jack Lam 122_ At the gas' City Council meeting, stet( and the City .O,ptr it disrussed S +dway /Cooke' memorandum of October 15, 1979 exploring the cOny,os,tion of an advisory committee for the develuivnent of the General Plan Sedway /Cooke suggexted that the group have any- where from 15 to 25 members, be broad based In representation art have at least thn following representation (2) City council (1) Buildinq /develop. (2) Plann,eg Coorm%sion meat concerns (2) Alta Loma C,t'zens Advisory Commission (1) Environmental (2) Cucamonga Citt.-Pnx Advisory Commission conce, ns (21 Etiwanda Citizpss Adslsory Conndsston (1) Low and moderate (1) Local small Nus,,,sss and professional r'ont Prn% income housing (1) Indust, ial r,., .,nx concerns (1) Wastewater tre, ment (1) Schools (l) Parks A Recreation The Planning Commission had reviewed these suggeltlnns and made furtl-or suggestions for Council consideration which are C /Pac (North Town) Senior Citizen Rep Youth Mobile Rome Park Rep Citizens not now connected hits. Goverrvnert liealth Care Rep. Equestrian people Clergy the Cnirtunity Advisory COmImIsSIOn also suggcsleJ the possibility of including someone from Agriculture, Police, and Fire City fou ^c.l Agenda • G. Storm Urain_Master Plan Update Report by Lloyd Wubbs November 7, 1979 Approval to execute a phased agreement with L D king Engineering to provide revisions to the Master Plan of Storm Drains L D Ring wts selected from five firms that Proposed to complP,e this work The selection committee composed of two members of the LOUnc!I, Chairman of the Planning Commission, a representative of the Cbamher Illlustrial Committee, the County flood Control Engin,er, and the f,tv Engineer The agreemient has bean developed to result in a series of reports dealing with Inmrdiate needs and will result it a final largo scale revision to the current Master Plan Of peiniry coorern is the resolution of all drains iAlfch will outlet to the Cu:amonga Creek project and revi,irn of the Mister Plan of drains in tale industrial area Both of thesf- , -menu are req-sired by tale middle rf February 1980 The study hudgtt will be somewhat less than the S100,000 budgeted for this item in the 1979 -80 budget 124 Recommendation It is recor Tided that the Courcil approve execution of the agretnent and appropriation of storm drain funds to conduct the Scope of Work as described It Selvicgs. for Prose(ution of City violations Report by Lauren 139 As the City Council is aware berauso of recent court cases the Citv Attorney nay no longer prosecute vlulat!ons of city tn'dinan•es Therefore, it is necessary that other arrangements be made tr handle all prosecutions Go the Iltv's behalf On nr, interim basi, the a ty has been using the liw firms of William Cuthbert, Inc to handle its cases. The film also handles prosecution wnrk for the City of Ontario The other titles in the West End have been unable to secure legal counsel, aId th"Iefn r, those agencies have exPrevse I an interest in having th,- San I'rr•„ ditto County District Attorney handle prosecu- tinn tblougn a'peso) ,unh•a(tural arrangement The city staff has brew involve) wlrh other ,Ity managers of the West End cities It willing out an agreement with the District Attorney s offirn to hyldle urosecutions At rile tlrr of vrr In 101%vnent, we and the city of 0ntari0 nude nr nmui rev. t; rn I'd.tlt,pdte In tin• Ino'j "r 41nn' bolh alien it•, der no re- eIving an aurquate level of srrvire Since the start Of w rho fiscal year, the City has expended a•,o, ImatPly ;1200 fit prosecution services Of that amount, hnwrse, , ,xlmitely $750 .vas spent for the proset-ltiot of a complex zon!nq ,ter, la. While the City has ihP Option of signing with the District Attorney's office to handle prosecutions at the rate of $29 53 per hour, the staff recommends that we retain our ,:nrking relationship with William Cuthbert at a rate Of $40 q0 per hour The reasons for recommending that we retain the firm of William Cuthbert is that it,,, City will City Council Agenda -12- 'Irvenbpr 7, 1979 retain sule discretion ani control of all enforcement an.i prosecution In addition, there is one provision included in the proposed County contract which provides that the City shall hold harmioss, defend, and identify the County of San Bernardino Oistrlrt Attorney, its employees and agents for any claims midi or actions brought by others Connected with or rising from tilt jerfmwm Tnce of this rentract The Crt, s relationship will, '11111am 'uthbPrt does not Inntain a hold harmless agreen.pn' The fnunty has inJrcated that th,c portion of the contract is non- negntiable and must be InclLded Recommendation since tFp City is presently receiving an adequate level of ;rrvirr from William luthbett, Inc it is re ommended that we irt.im that fit" to iawllr all pro ^tut inn of ,ty Ordin m, n. .hcy^ n it i; 115,. ,r• pup..... Ihat a letter he se.t to flip Pis',i.t Attorney ind Lratipq rhnt at sme.. point in the Igl,pr file I,ry may wish t0 fart it giale it, flip program Offr,Pd 1• the f`i,tricf Attor,,P.'s •,ffiLe I Resolutiors ad,lustinq the monthly ;aia.y for thq City Cl•rk and City reasurer Repnrt by iauren Wassei—an RESOLUTION NO rq -R7 140 A RES"L INI'I Of TIIF CITY COII!Irll OF THE LITi liF - RANL310 fil'.Att04L.A, LALIFORtIIA, RErEALING PESOLO'ION 'in 'A 16 AND AIi InSTING THE SALARY OF TRF CITY TRFA,URFR RESOLUTION NO 79.bJ 141 A RESOVITInN OF THE CITY COMI,II OF 111E (!If OF RANCHil C`1CAf10'lGA CALIFORNIA, RErEA11NG RESnLUTln'I [in 79 13, APPOIU ING THE CITY CLFRK, AND AOJOSIING THE SALARY OF CITY CLERK J. Consideration of a prl,cy to prohibit snokiny within the new 142 Lion's Park Cormun,ty Center Report Fly 6111 Nl IIpy - 1, Request by Daim.dlan Wnlf( and "•.nLi.• OS In, esrrgiLionL 143 from the moratorium. Report by Jack Lan 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 8 HEN BUS14ESS a Council b Audience 9 ADJOURHNENT ?,.ancho Cucamo 'ya Cham5cr o f Commerce 9354 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RAULHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 81730 TELEPHONE 714.987.1012 Noventei 7, 1979 Mmbers of Council City of Rancho Cucamonga, Dear MTrbers of 0ouncil: the Chamber's Baird of Directors uanannivously rac melnds to Council the adoption of Ordinance No. 86 (Revised 11/1/79) (Establishing a Growth Management Plan) and Resolution No. 79 -74 (Revised 1111P9) ( Establishing a Residential Assessmant System) 'fie :7'X4Xr'S Board of Directors further urg,9 the O.ouncil to adopt as early a date for first application s1ftdtta2s as is cannensurate with goal plannirv, practices. 'fie City Staff, the Building Industry Association and the Board of RulLOrs have been of tronendous help to the Chanter's Growth Management Comdt`.ee and the bLard extends t1eir appreciation to than. the Directors also appreciates tine Council's indulgence in allowing our cannittee the tinm to thoroughly review the proposed ordinance and resolution Sincerely yours, N�A. Wver, President M E 11 0 R A N 0 U M DATE Novarber 1, 1979 TO City Council FROM: Laur -n M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Special Legal Counsel Councilman Mikels has requested additional informs tion regarding the special legal counsel to handle city prosecut ons As Council may be aware, the City A:torney is prohibited by law from prosecuting violations of city ordinances Therefore, back in July the City Attorney suggested that we employ special counsel The titles of Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga bath have used the firm of William Cuthbert, Inc The fees are $CO 00 per hour for services rendered The other titles in the West End F•ve yet to prosecute under the new law, so they are considering an arrangemer• with the District Attorney's office to ha•e the DA handle prosecutions for cities Tie DA has priced the .ervice at $99 53 per hour However, there are a few strings attached The first is that the DA will not permit, the City to dictate how the cases shall be handled lie feel Lhat it is essential that we be in- voived in the handling of cases The second major joint is that the contr submitted by the District Attorney for consideration of the West End citb the standard hold harmless clause which we have b-en challenging consiste• since incorporation The DA has indicated that this particular clause nust be n the contract Is a matter of information, the firs of William Cuthbert has assigned one of its attorneys, David Camnlchael, exclusively to the cities of Ontario end Rancho Cucamcnga We have nod a number of meetings with Dave and have dnve'oped a procedure for handling prosecutions Since the beginning of the fiscal year, the City has spent approximately $1200 for special counsel Of that amount, however, approximately $750 is directly attributable to one particular zoning violation which was extremely eifficult to resolve; that involved an Illegal trucLing operation which was located in a residential area of Alta Lama Now that that problem has been resolved, the fees per month seem to be quite reasonable, and we would recomrend that the relationship with William Cuthbert, Inc. be retained For liur information we are enclosing copies of the past billings since the ne% fiscal year We have also asked Bob Dougherty 'o submit any comments he may have concerning the use of either William Cuthbert or the County District Attorney to handle presecutions Hopefully that material will be i,i your hands prior to our city council meeting on Wednesday Special Legal Counsel November 1, 1979 Page Two In summary, it is our view that the City should continue working with William Cuthbert even though the hourly fee is approximately $11 higher than that pro- posed by the District Attorney. We are concerned that the District Attorney will not give the City the proper level of attention since we wilt be competing with other West End cities for attorney time. In addition, we have a feeling that the $29.53 per hour fee is extremely low and will be increased significantly once we are all 1nLo the program. naturally, that cannot be verified at this time As we have indicated, we are quite pleased with the working relationship we have established with Dave Carmichael of Cuthbert's office. Dave has been willing to meet with us when necessary to work out whatever problems we have. He has also done an excellent job in handlipg hose items which have required legal assistance. If you ha • any questions prior to the Council azeting, please contact me Copies of previous billings and ether information 1 being provided to you LMW:baa attach. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 26, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: Additional Bi for Special Legal Counsel , As the city council is mare, the city attorney, by law, may not prosecute violations of city ordinances. Therefora, in those rare instances Involving proaacutlon, the city attorney employs special counsel. We have reviewed this arrangement with Sam Crowe, and we feel it to appropriate and the price is reasonable. We had been meeting with other cities in the West End to determine whether the saes service could be pruvided by the District Attorney's office. How- ever. that does not seem like a reasonable approach at this time. When discussing the method of billing, I suggested to Sam that William Cuthbert, the attorney employed for prosecution, bill the city directly rather than includin6 his bill as a part of Covington 6 Crwe's monthly bill. An has been our custom, we will continue to provide you copies of the city attorney's billing for both regular service and for the special prosecution when It does occur. The bill for the month of June to $560 Us do not anticipate the same level of activity every month for the remainder of the fiscal year. If you have any questions, please contact me. LMW:ba a, .tiy.,. ., ;,., f.• .. "•+�'..t a <Ats v:x° :._, t,G,'Fo�;r�:e:�u:.y >•`,n -_�`i" `a l~ :J.r JYr. w. _.Y2. `.tr L. .,. _. .. r - -r. '.�"�'- >.'•+l...S1. �. City of �4 J. 7CH0 ^, vAr tMB taa av - �I..�.�B56�uu um TO MER or WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC 15003 VANAR R0, ',:', LA PUENTE CA 91744 . �•L't- CUGNONba BMNCII ^irii!: :+ I'lC �.ii;,yi,�* i :r wiRr' sANC Or A,EJ1,tA 'i ••,i. -:.P.. ,,... CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 RIjTABl nnf vcatwR Fo V R[cm d 1. KCPMr M..gYI d1tt 1,wU�10G 6M031 dfC.TMr audwr 6/79 -LEGAL SV 01 -19 -28 560.00 560.00 ,ten', .: ..s. .( /t9�.i i. �•�+�. n •�s�•µ}�.,r s: r .. n'ia�.�:.::Fli;�'e`l.ur`.,.:��r ^ryiC_':� "I�'��.�;y ....•. .•. :.r1 -w- . -.t • NB44BNT NO. —A7170. ....�4 %A6.0(1 - - = ,- 560.0C r� H E H O R A N D U H TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager PROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: Jul, 33, 1979 RE: City of Rancho Cucamonga Billing (William J. Cuthbert) for the Month of Juno, 1979. Please find enclosed herewith original cover tatter dated July 6, 1979, together with the City of Rancho Cucamonga billing for the month Of June, 1979, in the amount of $560.00, represent= ing legal services rendered to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by William J. Cuthbert, Esq. Said billing is being forwarded to you for payment per our telephone conversation this date. RED:agg Enclosures •T:..a `.�>•,1y^ 1i.G fir: a`'S --'.r � i. _ _ Sri .� .. -L .r i.� �. �__ _ r�..�..r. u..,V.i�•i..alli.� :.r L. L.., Olrl[[e WILLIAM CUTHBERT. INC. ..ro•n..o.0 ce +.o..r.e. wnL..r• cu,..[[., QlllZ j3f iuoa uv ......e.o ruv . ewFcmm evu 9 G `n J�� L• �r,� fl July 6, 1979 �� ntiti Mr. Samuel Crowe Covington 6 Crowe 1047 West 6th Street Ontario, California 91762 Re: City of Rancho- Cuca4onga Billing (Moth of June, 1979) Dear Sam: Enclosed please billing for the month of June, 1979, in the total sum of 560. / WJC /bn Enclosure Rs E f E A !79 cay " "no Dept. Very truly yours, ILL 1 TH RT Pile! N V H m c� z 0 u O Z V „O H M u • A A fm� A .0 A•+ L 0 fpl� �A am F F o n N V v C b °• 9 9 Y V d C C C Y M N 7 m m 1 M m 0 O 2p go 0. h C f.p 10 O O O m m m m Y Z 0 0 N C C L to M M G A v•Yi PL M 0 0 V N M ^! U M m M m C 0 d m c c M po m O i m ^V 0 U G m V mb > m V u O O O 0 W W 0 Vm O V V O Opt 0 > M W u m m O m N K T Tym +� 3M iA M M N 0 Y N +di u01 M N0 V 0 Y W G O F O O O O m m O A m W W N A 0Y MV O OCC m 7 m m M{• pd p0 0 Y y ^6 W 0 0 i d 0 d Y Z Y O U U M ,C m 0 0 to C Ym u m m FCf+ O u VA m Cm 0.L 0. L E r• 10 ••� F M Y dQ NO Y0 uv N 0 i.nA Od0 YA F O um Y a Uyq1 0 0.n0. YF C6m a FOO SS N 0 w —0 m< 'aa -pan¢ �mo, Z N M LI i n •(G-��1 Z O N d am F F 41 n M N N Z O N d N F o n N V O N C n p Y m � � N F G F W C b °• a s \ n N\ \ \ n N m \ \N m N \ � ` ` n n•\n \ n n � n F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 pnAUr nru ppA +�pN /OF YOUR RECOPC [woc[� wc.v*gw Kcou•rr M.vw� O.wiu+.0 oros. oxpwr •uwnr LCGAI SVCS 7/ 01 -19 -28 ISC.00 ISC.00 I WARRANT N0. x,01405 -. IAC.00 _ - - - - 180.00 / COVINGTON 6 CROWE D+unc[aevD•oro" •none {r{ wr "w .[t \..«. t tM 1011 {flr ,"UZI C ... C•O•a . IOif O / /1p[ eOM 1 {I{ , * cc m D[D•D[ . re.va• [ DDYe•[.r1 oM -w111Q ewu rowqu one{ M.[n DOW \D 0.1u \VY •O.[•. r Kw.Y[. p0I60M1 A 1M.wOY. tYi.Y "'O' Auguot 13, 1979 lb-. Harry Empoy Finance nireetor City of Rancho Cucamonga City Nall P. O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91030 Re: William Cuthbert, Inc. Billing for July, 1979 Dear Mr. Empey: Enclosed please find William Cuthbert, Inc.'s bill for July, 1979 in the sum of $180.00, which we are forwarding to you for direct payment. Very 'ly your Robert E. Dougherty RED: coo enclosure If e� Q v oray DDp t i WILLIAM CUTHBERT. INC. ��2j2O�ctci l \9 \gyp August 2, 1979 Hr. Samuel Crowe Covington 6 Crowe 1047 West 6th Street Ontario, California 91762 Re: City of Rancho- Cucamonga Billing - (Month of July, 1979) Dear Sam: Enclosed pleas billing for the month of July, 1971, in the total sum p 80. , ' Very truly yours, A lr Z -1 "1zraz-- WJC /bn Enclosure � c, N � r W W W 1+ 1• N N N ~ N 7 N O 0 O \ 0 L C NL N H e C N A N z c� n .• F p O I v • m q W w N b 'pl. iNe W Jo W N 9 c 7 o ' CI A b C yA Z �'li p F J O M Ri n H A Mr 7 Y7 H'O 9 7 h 7 H moo b A O A ti m n 7 H O N Fl 1 O O 7 0< 7 h FG• y b �r � i 1-• G N w.li N o N r7 RVM hM N O •1 Nw oL M. w m m 3 b L M 7 0 O n a a n .. 7 W b 7 n 7 b 6 N N G1 R b H .. 1• N N N ~ N 7 N O 0 O \ 0 L C NL N ,gam.. 4�City of:1�.'_ :•�);�' �s.,,.:;�'m I '`=•• ,,r, •.tea °�; <�. °'�.� �`'�i:_ .' � •,� �zioio3iis !A TVe HwuHY •?;: .T.- ,.ii����440oouu NILLIAN• CUTMBE4T ,IKC i 1j'•' "0'%18113'E "ANAR ^? ,,LA P.UENTE CA 91T44j- f! aT•� .: • ,, Y�id;�::'i.:r -`,r ��.Lµ 6'y_(, 1 WCAMC OA /� j,. �:i•, .i ,'i: y,�f K•Xi]". . M OFAMML .. . s CITY IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAGE 1 Hi[ruMnro ronrmM ton coon n[Hpno +nv.h woo Hxsaurnar. •cewaM w.w •wwu wogs mcourr nrw,wr oca xw. 09112 LEGAL SERVICE 01 -19 -28 440.00 440.00 .A .Iyr ��e '•sH�f._1n.Rr1 s• -.: if - a�:.143.+ i. ��.{'h.� -Ls ✓`u:��•.•..- ra.r.X ..•I � z' �.w.j�.,Y -rt•. ..;:t'r +�.£.a �.:V,+ .L~`.i••• ^�- '-- .�':T-w•ta --w- MFCOAMT MO - A.)A[f J t'' j)tqD M E M O R A N D U M TO: Harry J. Empey, Director of Finance FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: geptember 12, 1979 RE: City of Rancho Cucamonga Billing (W1113.am J. Cuthbert) for August, 1979. Please find encloagd herewith original cover letter dated September 6, 1979, together with the City of Rancho ",camonga billing for August, 7979, in the amount of 640.001 .presenting - legal services randorAd to the City by William J. Cuthbert, Esq. Said billing is being forwarded to you for direct payment. RED:sgg Enclosures 01. 19.�g Mr. Samuel Crowe Covington 6 Crowa 1047 West 6th Street Ontario, California 91762 Re: City of Rancho- Cucm.longa Billing (Month of August, 1979) Dear Sam: Encicsed please find billing for the month of Augt •, 1979, in the total sum of $440. Very truly yours, LL,, WILLIAM J. CUTHBERT WJC /bn Enclosure L 1•t �91o.a- FilticZ.C9, Cy�t4�l uw cwnccs WILLIAM CUTHBERT. INC. . •.e+[u.e.0 co..eu...o-. nsea c.c+ •..•• wo•e wnwr <Viw[[w+ e•wo . [.•......C, \O111213/q lA nlu . d M"" 917" Tn[•wea[ 18131 sore. 9 f September 69 1979 1p SEP)s19 131 RECt +' co N otrs�w a aaa Mr. Samuel Crowe Covington 6 Crowa 1047 West 6th Street Ontario, California 91762 Re: City of Rancho- Cucm.longa Billing (Month of August, 1979) Dear Sam: Encicsed please find billing for the month of Augt •, 1979, in the total sum of $440. Very truly yours, LL,, WILLIAM J. CUTHBERT WJC /bn Enclosure L 1•t �91o.a- FilticZ.C9, Cy�t4�l N Y Y J O m N \ Y \ \ 1 J E � ro n Icro° H b C c M v z 0 7C au a 1.J m Y 7 Y 1• G N N a 7 7 O O n m N ~ 1.1 cr" 1-1 n z A � AN t•1 0 H £NJ £J aiq 9mtl ;d N o g°g u N N A 7C au a 1.J m Y 7 Y 1• G N N a 7 7 O O n m N ~ 1.1 cr" 1-1 n z A � AN t•1 0 H £NJ £J aiq 9mtl ;d N rm0 'dn0 R W 0 1 '0o N• a J roar 11OYn c°mO n [9' 7C au a 1.J m Y 7 Y 1• G N N a 7 7 O O n m N ~ 1.1 cr" 1-1 n z A � AN t•1 0 H £NJ £J tnPH 9mtl ;d ro rm0 'dn0 R C O> 0 1 '0o N• a roar 11OYn c°mO n [9' y7H C M 6 6 6 tj C C �n ° OM° M v n ym - O 0 .0Y .�A'a!a V oY y0' +7 P C m7 pOM� O YO.• m O m as C 9 ryCry t r 0 A M y M O O MN W O .yy 6 t 7 M Nary woo M tb 0 M n V. y � rib 7C au a 1.J m Y 7 Y 1• G N N a 7 7 O O n m N ~ 1.1 cr" 1-1 n z A � AN t•1 0 H £NJ £J CITY OF RANL110 CUCAM09CA MLMOU. D(21 Date: Nov,vber S, 1979 To: City Council From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Develorxent Subject: SUGGESTIONS FOR THE GENERAL PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY CC MITTEE The mollowing Is a list of suggested appointments to the Citizen Advisory Committee "these are out sugpvsLions and I- Is rot our intent to tell the mound. who to appoint or not to appoint on the Coamittee These sug- gestions are based upon the staff Impressions or capable individuals but certainly these ny he ot`tr capable Individuals wbo can do just as good a - job These suggestions are as follows: (2) City Council (2) Planoing Commission (2) Alto Loma Citizens Advisory Comm (2) Curawnga Citizens Advisory Come (2) Etlyradn Citizer, Advisory Comm. (1) Local small business 6 professional .onrcrns ( ) Industrial conceis 41) Building 6 development concerns (1) Environmental concerns (1) 'ow and moderate income housing con, erns (1) Schools (1) Parks and retreat ton (1) North Town (1) Equestrlar Respec t fug lY' submitt -ed, J. \C: LP4, Dl4eet��f Curmunity Developmrht JL:rm To be appointed by themselves To be appointed by themselves To be appointed by themselves To be appointed by themselves To be appointed by themselves Don Hardy, Pr.rdentlal Insurance Jeff Sceranka, Lucas Land Company Ken Willis, B.I.A. Marlin Dickev, Gcologtat, Chafiey College Hate Rosenberg, Inland Counties Legal Svcs Nom Guith. School Superintendent Kathryn Bridge Nacho Gracta, C -Pac Pam Henry, Alta Loma Riding Club ORDINANCE NO. 91 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RELATIVE TO THE LOCATION OF REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 81, AND PROVIDING FOR ITS ADOPTION AS AN URGENCY ORDINANCE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Regular meetings of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca ffornia, shall be held in the Lion's Park Coaunity Center, 9161 Base Line Read, Rancho Cucamonga, California, starting with the regular meeting of the Citty Council on December S. 1979 l.,¢,• L SECTION Ordinance No 81 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca fornia, is hereby—,. a ed• SECTION Construction of the Lion's Park Community Center has been completed ere ore, the City Council determines that it is necessary that this Ordinance be adopted as an urgency Ordinance and that the same shall take effect immediately upon its adoption �SECTION e The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of nZ) tin o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of November, 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk of /fj i�ff �744 f:rr../ ,.,.r , J• i J 4 f Ah✓ •I:.r r.1 •1 ff /r fpi M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 2, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT Further Information Central School vs the Builders On Friday morning we recel�ed a call from Ken Willis who indicated the builders have gone as far as they possibly can go, and they will fight any increase whatsoever in the school fees for the Central School District. Ken felt that he had been betrayed by the district superintendent who at first indicated that a $2,000 fee would be necessary and later changed to a $3,000 amount. K -n wanted us to understand that the Building Industry will also adamantly oppose any Further moratoria imposed by the City Council. The builders are prepared to seek legal remedies if necessary Ken's final comment was that at next Wednesday'; City Council meeting, 'we're going to go in looking like M.onard Jarvis, and anyone who gets in our way will be run over As you can see Wednesday promises to be an interesting City Council meeting LM baa PA "IP #COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD CONTRACT CmnY ppwrbd CONTRACT NUMUR District Attorney _ COUnry DglbnnY COntlKI NNIrKnYtnr I] grnewlde 0 Tsnwtn Jnems M. Qatri rb E.. o.Y ayQjn ll.l lib $ubQ1r'. NO 1MI N0 NO MWl,lb bKl 5 CMU Oro ❑E.wlWnwr iQ Rmdn t Nm.vrn rw rtwr UYll do pJlmmtbl lyd0l aroYY tiv ldbwp eaA Nwnv d prymmll a Fr A Embbrrr'D6 ,, ER. rld sin 1bl rrdl E THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereafter called the County, and hereafter called IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS' _ tune roc pn�ormann a CorRC dsterrlrw or v �KfYy pnra W for t,nn m w. cdYra[ennr and Obndrtronb Jnd ankh O(Jnr, UWdlOtRYN, Jnd JddlarrJ, d Im/ r 1. It" contract bolsJetm tha County of San Bernardino and the City of !Emden CucsniKp for the ps%oc&iM of mis3ccmncr and Sn£rrctlas offenses in violation of the City Ordin- anOm shall ocamenOe on the Nsriny follaAng the date the 143t party sisym the contract. to 2• acsiat District AMOMDOY�¢� any Amulner nme*ssary for affective innestigatleSm and pxoseasttm of ^d dc=& = and infractias offs uses tndsr tie Cih' ordinances. 7hs City shall seek the District Attorney's Comments befana bioptin4 nw Or amending onlim ices with igmso Criminal sanctions- 3. The City shal3 isudde the District Attcaaey a Cmplete and current set of all criminal ordinances res crd =i final ordi�sty This seat off City criminal ordlr� shall o! new or revised City remain the property Of rho District Atloxney. b. ass ictt. will meet center � i t of criminal of ordirwices of the City. S. Na offenses previously r3ferred to other Counsel by the City of Rands Cucamonga; for prosecution shall be referred to the District Atb=rey for praseartion rimvpt by agreement botwen said otter Counsel and the District Att amey and the •nose rUent eraxtttian of a notice of substttvtim of counsel. 6. Tho District Attorney, shall have cola dls=atton and mtttmrity DO prescriba Citation proacclur s and Soros to be used by City ecployoes in enfomment of City oxdinanoes (after oamultation with City a pinJaszs) l to prescribe investigatiars to be nrbTortakenl to prescribe avvidenOa to be obtained and xepww to be provided by City employees fOr purposes of prosooati nr to prescrLba those Carr a3tarx= in tdddn citatiare may be dimocly filed in Court by City wpltgees and those in which a pre -rmdiar and authorization mr3t be obtained fr® the punsa'utor's Officer to oaopromite charged to disaias dmrge, or dmres/ to pxosoarto by jury or Court trialr to seek xeviOd by Any provisions on the reverse side and refarencd attachments hereof constitute a part of this contract and are incorporated herein in full or•unraor udY rims F.F. s br 3 writ or appeal; to defend or respond to writs and appeals brought by persons charged with violations of City ordinances and all other prosecutorial for_tlars not other` wise described above. 7. All files and records prepared .i d rsintairnerl by the District Attorney related to the enforcement of criminal ordinances of the City are records and files of the District Attorney. 8. the City shall pry the County of San Bernardino at the rate of twentynine dollars and fifty -clues cents ($29.53) par hour or any fraction thereof for time incurred by deputy district attorneys in consultation, review and prosecution, eta.. of criminal ordininam of the City. 'nA aformrntiomd hourly rats includes the time and services of clerical, secretarial, investigative, adnlnistiatiw and support services of the District Attxmey's O£fieo. Costs or fees for court reporters services, transcripts of court proceedings. engnrt witness fees, scientific analysis, and travel and Per diem cost shalt be relutursod by the City at actual oust. 9. The District Attorney may sutrit monthly billings m the City for services provided order this contract. The City shall pay such billings within 15 days of receipt. The District Attorney shall maintain books and records of services provided for inspection by a designated representative of the City. 10. This contract may be wnminated by either party on 30 days written notice. thnless the contract is otherwise terminated, the hourly rate will be adjusted annually to an amount specified by the San Bernaniim Canty luiltDrClontroller. The annual rate adjustment shall beams effective upon the dispatch of written notice of the adjusted rato to the City. U. Upon receipt of written notice of terminat ion, no new, prosecutions shall be referred tD or acoepttd by the District Attorney. The City shall provide substitute counsel to assume prosecutorial responsibility for all caws penrdinng an time termination date. The District Attorney may, at the request of the City, continuo to luosecute a case or cases through judcpe nt in the trial court which case or cases teue pending at the termination date of the contract. The Canty shall be roiffiuusesl for such services of the District Attorney by the City at the hourly rate effective at the teuminatio n date of the on tract. 12. The District Attorney's designated representative for dry to day supervision of the prosecutorial respoaihili.tias uder the oontract is Chief Do uty District Attorney Art YAlUnster, address 1540 Mxntain Avenue, Ontario, Ch. Phone nurber (714) 988 -1221. 13. The District Attorney's designated representative for billing and financial nutters under the contact is M. Eldna Peters, Chief, I- Wo9cment Services, address 172 hest Third Street, San Bernardino, Ch. Phone nuffior (714) 383 -1147. 14. The City's designated representative for receipt of billings and administration of the contract on behalf of the City is U umem M. Wasserman, City Mmager, P. O. Box 793, Pancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730. 15. The City shall hold harmless, defect, and JUYJe � the CUnmty of San Bar ardino, the District Attorny, their employees and agents for any clat made or actions brought by others connected with or arls.nnq from the performance of this contract. a�rn�e ••n� »ettatn�re »�rt�e�tr�ee�• •uf COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ► Chairman, Board of Supervisors Dated ATTESTED ► Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (SUN it Corporation. Company, er4 BY ► Mudwrued S rwtiva) Dated Title may= Address Approved as to 110 loan Raviawed a W eupgat apandl M County Coumel County Admmimatk• 011ke OCOUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD CONTRACT Co tv O.pv.mrm CONTRACTNUMBER District Attorr Ca.nw D+tr U.Nm Cwuan R.p.vnYlm Cl R.r.rn.b. L Tmmwm James M. Cramer vN E.r 2022 al. suawtU., NO sb rl.o coq NO J N. Ampnl o. CanvKl 305 1 001 toC 0r El E.R�nu.. 2R.v.nw IrawNKl N. mar. urnon p.rnq.rM r.>OI aanpNry lM iKlavuq SSA II w irMa NYrwa of R.ymrnl. _ Er.vbrR IDII Emmsrya.rmum or.AC S THIS CONTRACT Is entered Into in the State of California by and beMCen the County of San Bernardino, hereafter called the County and The City of Rancho nrracnnga hereafter called nn.,, riw IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS. CUm spurs b/pw and ra.ers. pdf or farm d ncvd d See IaN sarr.ro ro ba ra.demd, amwnr ro avpim, mmnn o /p,sytllen4 tqu Car pref4WtUlMa w aprlp /eegn, d8WM,r rfgn of YhrfMion, pile`,N m and ream lw f.rrron fqn, 00" fsnns and cardwws. ono ufdch p /rs. 4w fK rgnr and udatrga, d any l 1. Shis omtxact botsean the County of San Berardino and the "Sty of Rancho Cucamonga for th3 prosecution of misdemeanor and infract(m offenses in violation cf the City Ordin- ances shall ommnce m the Monday following the Babe the last party signs the Contract. 2. She City shall assist the District Attorney and shall direct the City's etployeea to assist the District Attorney in any manner rje a s ary for effective investigatim and pro;ecvtim of misdensamr and infraction c_°fgues undar the City ordinances. She City shall seek tho District Attorney's comments before adopting noes or caeRdisg ordinances with iaposo criminal moony. 3. The City shall provide the District Attorney a ccmpleter and Current set of all criminal ordinances enacted by tho city. She City shall f=n sh the District Attorney copies of ni`w or revised Criminal City ordinances. Sfhis set of City criminal ordinances shall certain the property of the District Attorney. G. The District Attorney will Beat and confar with dasigrnated representatives of the City as nx;uirod to promoter fair, cal and vigorous enforcement of criminal ondinarces of the City. 6. She District Attorney shall have sole discretion and authority to prescribe Citation promrhsres and fortms to be used by City aeployees in ahfoxcenFnt of City ordinanoes (after co nsulta•im with City fahplayees) i to prescribe investigations to be Udertaken; to prescribe ovidmoo to be obtained and reports m be provided by City eaployoes for purposes of prosec utioni to prescribo those circuastancie s in which citations eery be directly fiYhd in court by City Employees and those in which a pro- review and authorization ant be obtained from tike pxosecutrr's office; to ompmatw charges to dismiss charge or charges; to prosecute by jury or court trials to seek review by Any provisions on the reverse side and referenced attadhments hereof constitute a part of this contract and are incorporated herein In full. (Uilrl 1.101 awe V.) A... 1 or 3 writ or appeal; to defend or respond to writs and appeals brought by persons charged with violations of city ordinances and all other prosecutorial functions not other- wise described above. 7. All files and records prepared and maintained by the District Attoaxy related to the enforcement of criminal ordinances of the City are records and files of the District Attorney. 8. The City shall pay the County of San Bernardino at the rate of tuentynine dollars and fifty -three cents ($29.53) per has or any fraction thereof for tine incharrd by deputy district attorneys in mnnsoltation, review and prosecution, etc., of criminal ordinances of the City. The ofarmmtimed hourly rate includes the time and services of clerical, secretarial, investigative, adnLdstrative and support services of the District Attorney's Office. Costs or fees for mist reporters sere ce s, transcripts Of court proceedings, expert witness fees, scientific analysis, and travel and per chum cost sFa1t be reimbursed by the City a^ actual cost. 9. The District Attorney nay submit monthly billugs to the City for services provided under this contract. 'fie City shall pay such billings within 15 days of receipt. The District Attorney shall maintain books and r -=ds of services provided for inspection by a designated representative of the City. 10. This contract any be teminated by either party on 30 days written notice. unles& the contract is otherwise terminated, the hourly rate will be adjusted annually to ern e=mt spec':ted by the San Barns ;him County Auditor- Contreller. the annual rate adjustment Anal become effective room the dispatch of written no'cice of the adjusted rate to the City. ll. Upon receipt of written notice of termination, no new prosecutions shall be referred to or aoceeptod by the District Attorney. The City shall provide substitute counsel to assume prosecutorial respamibility for all cases pending an the t minitien date. 'fie District Attorney my, at the request of the City, continue to prosecute a case or cases thmrgh judgment in the trial court which case or cases were pending at the termination date of the contact. The county shill be reimbursed for such services of the District Attorney by the City at the hourly rate effective at the termination date of the contract. 12. The District Atmmey's de nignated representative for day to day supervision of the prosecutnrial responsibili, les under thn contract is chief Depitty District Attorney Art ;hinter, address 1540 Mountain Av mus, Ontario, CA. Phrase number (714) 988 -1221. 13. The District Attonley'e designated representative for billing and financial ratters radar the contract is ra, Dl d na Peters, Chief, Management Services, address 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA. Phone number (714) 383 -1147. 14. The City's designated representative for receipt of billings cud administration of the contract On behalf of the City is Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager, P. O. Bon 793, Rancho Cucmmorga, CA. 91730. 15. The City shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the Ocunty of Ban Bernardino, the District Attorney, their employees and agents for any chines cede or actions brwyht by othars connoted with or arising from the prfarmtnos of this contract. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO r Chavman, Board o Supemwrs Dated ATTESTED Clerk of the Board of Supemlwrs P •' • t • P r C' ISOM it corpo wn, conewry, ata.) By ► fAUNOr4td Siquawl Dated Title kbx r Apprond a to kgaI fam RwkwM n to oudget uprnditun County Counftl County AdmmiNat" 011m P. -4 WA *COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD CONTRACT fAmn e.p.11lll.m f TRACT NUMBER my apilnM rl [q1 \IFI fpMfY11M n RNIfrgW O TMTiNIA Jams M. Crazier en E.1 2022 a.l. 91Wp1 Unit N0 tort NO uIW NO Job NO AmWnrb fonv.n 305 001 thn1a10M CNn err 0 E.p ,,l . Rjtama n connlll N. man llYn on otrmRit p noml oarWn.IM IWloauq. SSA a wFg iil :IUI1INI of pYlrl.ntl Em .r le o of 1# S THIS CONTRACT Is entered Into In the State of California by and between the County of San Bernardino, hereafter Called the County and Ils,o f4 s of a,..,a., nrra.... a , hereafter Called IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS F0LLOWS: fUw seen ftlaw Ind rrrerae ode el fWm d needed Set fwM anent" to be rra*md. Mona! N aemald, marmv of wyn -wt, rlmb fW Xlf0 MMM "Cemelvtd . deMm,mfmn of MNSWfery 4i0y0fnYnM XId MM fW ft m1w Wn. O0ff INM and f daw;s, and It -h pLws, fpecdW tf X Ind oddr1 . If Iny I 1. This ocneract betsacau thu County of San Berardino and the City of R'ml]SO Ctraffunrsa for the prosecution of misdemeanor and infraction offenses in violation of the City Ocdin- anoes shall camenoa on this M=by follading the date the last party aigns the contract. 2, The City stall assist tiro District Attorney and shall direct the City's Employees to assist to a District Attorney in any Banner necessary for e£f0.'tive investigation and prosecution of misdacezi or and infraction offenses under the City ordinances. The City shall seer the District Attorney's cuts before rdcpting new or amending ordinances with hrose crimirwt sanctions. 3. The City shall provide the District Attorney a cmplote and current set of all criminal Ordinances enacted by the City. The City shall Asrnish the District Attorney copies of new or revised mminal City ordinances. This set of City criminal ordinances shall remain the property of the District Attorney. 6. 7Ae District Attoxary will meat and confer With designated represerutatives of the City as re*drtd to planate, faire eernal and vigorous eefor seem of criminal errtin rloas of the City. S. No offense + previously referred to othe counsel by the City of Rancho Cuezaonga for presoculti- shall be referred to the DLcrict Attorney for prosecutions except by agreement b widen said otter coua'sal and the District Attorney and the sub,ogirnt executions of a notice of subst:attiar of courusol. 6. The Dsstrict Attorney sum' 1 have sole di=etirn and authority to prescribe citation procedures and fames to be used by City erployees in enforcment of City ordinances (after oon'ultatio n with City mpleyees) t be prescribe investigations to be sm.va.+atrer.r to prescribe evidence to be cbtairl i and reposto to be provided by City aployees for purposes of prosecution; to prescribe those circumstances in which citations my be dirw*ly filed in court by City erployees and those in itsids a pre- review and authorization most be obtained from the prosecutor's officer to omprraise charges; Any provisions on the reverse side and referenlxd attachments hereof constitute a part of this contract and are incorporated herei- In full. of lr]ILloi(L"F ml e.p I .I 3 to dismiss charge or cha gTMt to unsecuto by jury or cant trialr to seek review by writ or appeal: to defend or zaepcud to writs tmd appeals brought by persons charged with violations of City ecdbwces and all other prosecutorial functions not other- wise described above. 7. All files and records prepared and mmaintainod by the District Attorney related to the enforcement of criminal ordinances of the City ana records and files of the District Attorney. 8. The City shall pry the OMnty of San Berardino at the rate of twentytnine dollars and fifty -three cents ( $29.53) per hour or any fraction thereof for time incurred by deputy district attorneys in consultation, review and prosecution, etc., of crfmt ,1 Ordinances of the City. The a£oretrentio ned hourly rate includes the time and services of clerical, secretarial, investigative, administrative and support services of the District Attorney's Office. Costs or fors for court reporters services, trazs¢ipts Of court diem �tpocroce ings t toss fees. scientific analysis, and travel and per reirbursed by the City at actual cost. 9. 'doe District Attorney may sutmit monthly billings to the City for services provided under this contract. The City shall pay such billings within 15 days of receipt. The District Attorney shall maintain booths and records of services provided for inspection by a designated representative of the City. 10. This contract my be tsnminatcd by either party on 30 days written notion. lktln the contract is otherwise irmafnatod, the hourly rate will be adjusted annually to an amount specified by the San lemur i +m County Anditar -Co ntmller. The annual rate adjustment shall become effective upon the dispatch of written notice of the adjusted rata to the City. 11. Open receipt of written notice of termination, no new FwLsecutions shall be referral to or accepted by the District Attrmmy. 7-lo City shall provide substitute counsel to District Attorney �lity for all cases pending on the termnationn date. The for ney may, at the request of the City, antSmn to prosecute a case or cases throu3h judgment in the trial court vi hicn case ar eases were pending at the te>mbuatim datO Of the contract. 'Die County shall be reimbursed for such services of the District Atternuv by the City at the hourly rata effective at the termination date of the contract. 12. Tea District Attoroy's designated representative for day to day supervision of the prosecutorial responsibilities under the contract is Chief Deputy District Attorney Art MKInster, address 1540 Mountain Avmuo, Ontario, CA. Plana comber (714) 988 -1221. 13. The District Attorney's designated representative for billing and financial mutters under the contract is M. Edwina Peters, Chief, Madgmrnt Services, address 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, CA. Phony number (7141 383 -1147. 14. Tie City's designated representative for receipt of billings and administration of the contract on behalf of the City is Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager, P. O. Boac 793, Rancho Q=amcnga, CA. 91730. 15. The City shall hold harmless, defend, and indemnify the minty of San Bernardino, the District Attorney, their eapleyees and agents for ary chime made or actions brought by others wznocted with or arising fron tl�e parfomancs of this contract. tf lfttMllf tf RANf ttA�if ff ffflfHHttf f fA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Chairman. Board of Supervisors Dated ATTESTED, ► Clerk of the Board of Supervtscrs ISDN If corpor . c 4)Ariy. erc.l By ► lAuotortred 519ruttusl Dated Title _ 14= Add••ss Approval as to kipl form Rwi-wed in to G#rt •rpeMdur• ► __ ► Cqumy Coore.l County pdmmktrsAn Ullla t I _ 1 1- "'- ^- k:•�+ -i' till. �; ' r tr 1:.� go DAY - •. . .,� r r � v. l r 1 r .. �` I •— I 11 V• ' fin. � � `F � �', �••; � 9? • -� \� I - •• - - - STU Rl I S_T. DY_I ` CIT A CH,' C ON A c k •1 _ — r rj 1 ♦ _ �. , • I — � — - MIDL�TIAL r o �: -- '41' . .I ij `? ,,,• _ STUQY AREA ; gl -`LtY41- 4.- \R'n _ •f...i I•SYl'iJ� � \ -•^ In L.A'� _ ��n I ' M v t J 1 \ \\ / M fwP 1 r Y AEI a•�/ K r-rL � Aut DAY - ETIWA DA j - SAN E C fKS KS STU ON A SCALE r -4000' 1 1 �- STUQY AREA ! . • .TI. T 1 'r4 1 ` r EXHIBIT MAP "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FEBRUARY, 1979 FIGURE N0. - •� i i�, -.s:. u..._n - •4^'.ro.he.F- ���� "i��A l-f.����NN i •.� , - "k ".M. r ' se d Of 71u„rr, CENTRAL 11.a1A Mrwr, paA.et two t isybo'Cl"t Hassle] a Sew. aD S,Armbrr /''1tt�p' St✓SZOOL reneb VnyM.xra6rr COMMEN m w r. r•ad, xrnbrr ALt0m en.se C Bd. WMl DISTRICT Jess A AwC7t.,. lwf -1 S uPst"WMraI 9157 Foothill Boulevard Ilancho Cucamonga, Calitornie 91730 Tot. 711. 989.8511 November 2. 1979 City of Rincho Cucamonga P O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention, City Council The Central School District her experienced rapid increases in enrollment during the past several years as a result of new home clmstroction. Efforts have been made to keep pace with this rapid increase A bond issue was submitted to the voters and approved in 1977 for thr pur;-se of building the Done Merced permanent school and additions to the Cucamonga Junior High School Proposition 13 eliminated means to provide additional school construction to moot the building needs of the Central School District SE, 201 provides for the establishment of devolopars' fees to provide temporary housing of students. on August 25, 1978, E roceivee a letter from City Manager Wasserman outlining a copy of Ordinance 30 and a copy of the Declaration of Its- Faction procedure which must be followed prior to the City being able to oversell any type of school. fee A Declaration of Impaction was filed with the City on October 25 1978, requesting the establishment of developers' fees an per Ordi- nance 30 On November 1, 1978, Resolution NO 78-65 was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga concuring in the findings of the Central School District that conditions of overcrowding exist On December 29, 1978, the Can -ral School District received a letter from City ,tanager Wasserman reques =ing information for a Fact Finding Coomzittee The in- formation was submitted to Mr. Wasserman on January 5, 1979 In the Spring of 1979, a Fact Finding Committea was established by the P.nnceo Cucamonga City Council to study the needs of the school districto in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and establish n davelonera' fee Subsequent Fact Finding Committee meetings veto held the next months to gather data for the City Council's consideration A developers' fee vas established at $901 per dwelling unit within the Central School District This; was in addi- tion to a fee established for the L.haffoy Joint Union High School Distric- •t wac agreed that an annual review would occur. CENTRAL SCHOOL CLYAMONOA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOHA mittaD SCHOOL VAII'_ VISTA SCHOOL 7957 Archibald Ave. 7611 Herman Are 10310 9eb Abe St 7727 Vane Viva Driro Tel. 711.987.2541 Tel. 714407-1768 Tel. 714-980.1600 Tel. 714- 981.8697 city of Rancho Cucamonga Attentions city Council Hoverber 2, 1979 Page 2 The fees of $216,000 were an`icipated for the purchase of four portable class - rooss which have been inatplltd on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus. The school district exhausted its funding source, for the purchase of an additional 16 portable el"arooms which hews been snstalled as the W47a Merced 'Instant' School. The Central School District was abl• to eliaasste double 3 along for the fiat time in saveeel years a¢ a result of the addition of 20 cb,"rucros unfortunate- ly. some class sizes have exceeded 45 ctodants, necessitating a reevaleation of building needs in the Centzsl School District. The Gone ltere,ad pensneetl school F4 will go it id this weak[o provide interim aces panty dale of September, housing until that rise. The Central School Dl at:ict does no wish to ra4utfit plus nine regular portable classrooms at a cost of 512.Ot'0 to 145,000 p empo begin (up to threetyears) at a fraction units a portableelusmom. Cary and thheepreemaining 133 homes Yet toabe build will result in AM Writer" 164�s, Broad studsroo duringlete with furniturre during hescurrent school year in nine the Centre classrooms cone School Dis•rict thersce�ldistrict e+sFor these needs through salt in available 979," results in an increase in tax to the taxpayers for the next 30 years Several major capital expenditures hove been assigned to the Cucamonga Junior High School addition and to the Done Merced permanent school funds, including furniture, equipment, blacktop, fencing, plumbing. electrical installation, clocks, bolls, fire alarms, and site grading and preparation. In addition, the necessity to provide for Special pds�Ation cleeszoras has ben met by the 1"ge of trailers in lieu of A regular classr"em. These costs are being borne by the General Fund of the school district and arm not being re- quested for reimbursement from developers' fees, in The addition installation of nine es of1 04rperadwelliinne unit would result In 963,J25 in addition to the amount already received to be divided among the remaining 133 homes. This would result in a develops"' Its of $2,729 per dwelling unit The Central School District is willing to sesign the portions of the project previously outlined to oiler sources in An attempt to reach a compromise fee of $1,665 per dwelling Unit for the appraximately 133 tentatively approved units. City of Rancho Cucamonga °1 Attentions City Council November 2, 1979 Page 3 i A breakdown of the anticipated expenditures is as follows 4 portables - lease option balance $159,000 2 doublewide modular -.mite - 20 months (Dona Merced) 36,200 (including installation) 3 double-wide modular units - 19 months (Do?a Merced) 36,000 (including a,stallaticnl 2 double-wide modular smite - 17 months (Central School) 31,300 (including installation) 2 double-wide modular units - 15 months (Valle Vista) 28,1(y1 (including installation) Furniture and equipment 20,830 Utilities 4,000 TOTAL $315,430 Received as of November 1, 1979 ( 94,000) Amount requireds $221 °430 r�t requireds $221,430 5 1,665 Remaining dwelling unites 133 The Central School District respectfully requests the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Cowell establish a fee of $1,665 per dwelling wit effective immediately. Siinncceeerely, /n/ P/� Ho l C. With, Ed. D. Superintendent NCGSve `cos Lauren Wasserman, City Manager ecs Ken Willis, Building Industry Association ccs Central School District Board of Trustees ti, ME M0 DATE: November 6, 1919 Tri: city council FROM: City Lauren M- Wasserman SUBJECT: Prosecution of City Ordinance Violations councilman Mikels has asked why we are using the taw firecuttoilli CityCuthbert of La Puente rather than a local attorney to handle D ordinance violations Bob -lougFlertY has informed us that very few fir' are willing to handle prosecutilln ofnCicriordinances defense ince the firm would then be precluded by i,,w from handling ,� Generally speaking, there is more money to be made in criminal defense than difficult tionOf law in to give up la ma;orhsource of revenue in order to help cities. LMW:baa WARR NEi DATE 09/79 2 *356.00 09/79 7.50 10/79 68.567.40 11/19 75.00 _. . 11/79 50.00 - -� 117/79 41996.03 11/79 4,691 ,,tl5 .. 11/79 126.555 '15/79 400.02p '16/779 2,030.27 - 18%79 `63.60 '16/79• 7,077.28 '26%79 926.00 - '26/79 :26.55 ;26/79 4,642.88 X26/79 60.00 117/79 126 3.60- 5.050.00 78.06 32.00 _ 1,272.00 3.132.29 1,000.00 - 846.58 50.16 211.25 2r 391.16 5,950.00 221.82 5*000.00 3, 411t75 335.090 29,856.79 761.99 3,911.49 3,834.16 _ 75.00 324.08 2,012.50 250.00 2,136.44 575.00 102.91 21.00-^' 16.00 125.00 160.94 1,113.0, 150.41 260.00 14,91%_00 CIN R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WARR A YEN / V E N 0 0 R N A M E 00284 1500 BLUE CROSS 00285 3280 CITY OF EL JSEGUN00 00266 2677 DALE SHARP HC C 00287 7220 MATCHAM* KAREN OU288 7220 MATCHAM* KAREN C CO290 SANK8RRcNONO ROCEMPLOY G 5 75313 00291 2 5275 INTLI CITYPMGTT ASSOONT C OC293 8230 ROSRIGUEZ* KABACUK 2077 CEALIFORNla.L SSTATE OF ,1 CO295 HARRY 002997 330021 $MGEM GRADHICSSH, 00298 2250 CHADOOURNE CHHEVROLET 00299 003CO 2307 CITY OF GAMS 8313 SAN BRNONO 10 EMPLOY C 00302 CITY MGT S 927985 31& ENGL 40 02546 02581 8300 50LKMAVLASTICNSUPPLY 02596 02597 VOIC FORMS ALIGNMENT FORMS ALIGNMENT 599 8 VOID 0025 REI ER DEVELOPMENT. A H 0 03600 0031 AM 1NTL- BRUNING CIV 02601 0125 ACTICN TRAVEL AG.NCY 02603 024C ALTA LCMA AUTO PARTS t 02604 EARNCRDC 605 0 6C6 pO14Q Q55 4ND]RERSAN OBENNIE SUPPLY IN 02607 Q.bCB 1125 BAKER 122C1 SANK AMERICA NT C SA S 02611 1350 E5pbF BRIOGERBARTHUR� ROB 02612 0 175C ORUTSCIS EN G CONST 02613 02614 1900 C G ENGINEERING 2029 CALII'ORNIA GEOLOGY COMPANY 02616 2100 CARRF PAPER M 02618 j 05 CITY AIGO WATERO D15T 02619 2620 2615 OUSAMUN 02621 2650 DAIRY REP-RT CORP 02622 2790 CIA ONO INTL 82623 2805 OICTAPHO, 02624 201C OtETRICH -POST CO 02625 3175 EASTMAN INC 02626 3300 EMPEY* HARRY J �- 07627 4040 FEDCO 02628 4120 FONTANA SWEEPING 02629 4400 GARRETT• W 0 TELEPHONE CO 02630 4600 ENERA1 026312 4720 GCRGCN, C DOUGLAS C 02634775 ANT MAINE E JERRY R ' H 02633 4805 REVIEW 02634 5 4869 HIGHTSTOWNSINESS 0263336 4900 HCLLEYr WILLIAM L WM *LLOYD PETTY CASH OZ638 4995 HUBBS* 02640 IN01SC0 5115 02641 5140 INLAND POWER ;WEEPING OFFICIAL 02642 5218 INTL CONE BLOG ® L 02644 6185 BLAYNEYr ASSOCIATES* JON 02645 6630 LAM JACK 02646 6725 LEA6UE OF CALIF CITIES 02647 6790 LINSCOTT LAWS C GREESPA L 02648 6850 L A TIMES - E E SMITH .r ei.J rYy }"n�Z',`(..Y��jt�3•.'.yni•.i WARR NEi DATE 09/79 2 *356.00 09/79 7.50 10/79 68.567.40 11/19 75.00 _. . 11/79 50.00 - -� 117/79 41996.03 11/79 4,691 ,,tl5 .. 11/79 126.555 '15/79 400.02p '16/779 2,030.27 - 18%79 `63.60 '16/79• 7,077.28 '26%79 926.00 - '26/79 :26.55 ;26/79 4,642.88 X26/79 60.00 117/79 126 3.60- 5.050.00 78.06 32.00 _ 1,272.00 3.132.29 1,000.00 - 846.58 50.16 211.25 2r 391.16 5,950.00 221.82 5*000.00 3, 411t75 335.090 29,856.79 761.99 3,911.49 3,834.16 _ 75.00 324.08 2,012.50 250.00 2,136.44 575.00 102.91 21.00-^' 16.00 125.00 160.94 1,113.0, 150.41 260.00 14,91%_00 R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i MARR�VEN5" YENOpR NAME 02651 717spp9 MAINSTISn- EASS13C15 02654 25 7500 O A`MAMI CL�iUDIACYINC t OZ6589 820 PROGRESS COLOULLETTSE CITI 02661 8y0175 RAP pEEE0A7AEING H[TECTUR •02663 822060 ROpBrN5550NCOjANpS H '02665 8293 RUSSELLO{NEALOTCAL LAB _ 02667 83007 SAFETYGSTIRIPING SVGSS iN 02669 83525 IGNALTNAINTECcNA EOINCT 0267 02671 8390 OUTNECRNCCALIF EOISON -02672 8395 CALIF IPA CALIF GAS CO 02674 83958 SOUTHLARp M. PAPER PLL 02676 84708 SPECItIALTYSTYPENRITER SV 02679 6543 SFUFXNXRIL[EMARKETP OZ681 8780 TOYATRUCKCCC INC 02683 8910 UCLA EXTENSION 026E4 8955 UNIV OF CA LOS ANGELES 0:685 9105 VAIRIN MICHAEL 0 02687 9290 NEE 'Q END OUpNNTITED MAY Ep IL 02690 90[0 YUfO4 OTOTALSLASERVICE L 9 MARR DATE NET • It/W79 - 1,199.00 ]11/07/79 e12.17 1 y1/07/79 177.19 11%07!79 �. 7.20 7427.00 11/07/79 `1-v.• 75.00 ft /07/79 - 2 75.00 11/07/79 152.64 11/07/79 6,795.51 11/07/79 37.50 1/07/179 ^.c.± 435.87 1/07%79 20.00 1/07179 43,923.77 11/07/79 33.22 11/07/79 15.00 11%07%79 85.63 11/01/79 95.86 11/07/79 _ 2323.7E 11/07/79 2178.00 11/07/79 - 253.00 • 11/07/79 80.00 11/0 /79 75.00 1007/1/07/79 35.00 1/07/79 56.28 i:07S79 36.09 79 07/79 273.35 104.00 11/07/79 40.00 246,406.88 SPRlt�•��� _:��:. ♦ ' -6:vw� +'- r+l��+:I� . ;�v Fn V'2•� - lr'S'l!� CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY Mitsui. roe rag INSTRUCTIONS 1. Claleia for death. Injury to person or to perve,s prow mml D• filed Oal later khan 100 dap after the aetntermee. (Gov- 2. Claims for damages to real property most be tiled net later, than I year after me erparanct. (Ow. Code Si.. 9112) 1 Read enUro claim before DUA& S. '721 Uwclilm /mmimuust Eau sign cut wio= :i bolt omt, .cdeene. t. Attach sepant• aheets. It necmart77.� to give full delete. SION EACH SIMEr. 7. Claim most bt (Leaf with Ch ClerL (Gov. Coda See 913a) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Nameot Clalmatn - Gyre address to which you desire MUM or sent RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLADS No. GCG - IVv 9 CITY OF F.ANCHO CUCA6MORCA ACIA(NIUMMICIj OCT 24 1979 AM Pii �ia10(�(O(�Il(�(314j5(6 (U natural paraim) r r How did DAMAGE or INJURY uuur? Give full parUCUUM' T e� e/ t. S t w ,fit v / /,w.e v . f p/a QJ �fnr is y / f rf tspl •v 3 I PW =s ✓aS S %f Ft ) ' t / .c f, /ti ./ ./. r../ 'r'e Cc. sl•. <f e.J M,e /s �r /i 7.rv../ y N P Ae r.a. -r., S { 4 Ch.,Ic A. l.. of )'�.l ♦v p, nark,: A'r* A.,f.1�- ro + ti.- s.S ..s •./ .�• -; u.a mr �t �r..) : F to .a When dad DAMAGE or INJURY occurt Olv full parUcU1zM date. time of day: Le n P n („c J •rr7'• ad 3 Where did DAMAGE or INJURY aims? Describe fuUY. and bate on diagram on resent aide of this sheet, when appreprlate, Eve attack names and address and measurements from landmaclo: /,;,/ ,..t n. f c !, u.tut particular ACT w Oa1LSSION do you clam Caused the Injury or damage? Give names of Cry to ployeCa Caudng the ILA damage. It ), �: '/ Ad I dl' Sl,a ri a.' Aep.t,r O ifC; P/). 3 S What DAMAGE or INJURIES do You clolm Mull? Give full extent of injuries or damages claimed: 14 1 2,)y .. f L 1- i , r i - What AMOUNT do you claim on account of each item of injury or damage as of date of presentation of this autos, giving basis o Nmputstbn' '_ Alk I iv ESTDIATED AMOUNT as far as known you claim on account of each live, of prospects" injury or damsg4 giving bads o LEE PACE 2 (OM) 3 THIS CLA151 MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE S'IDI Insurance payments received. It any, and rumen of Insurance Company: on Name and addicts of Wilntaae; Dwton/tand HoepluU:��]] READ CAREFULLY For all accident [lain, piece on following file (rtIn tame, of street& Including North. East. South. and Weal; Indicate Place of accident by ' \- and by ahowmj how* numbers of dlalanees to Street lromeai d U City Vehicle war Involved. de,i�note by letter "A' location of City vrbtdo when rots tint uw It. and by "B' location of yourself or your veh,le when you flat ,%. City ve lr Imiton of City vehicle at tiroe of are dent by -A -1' and location of yourself or your vehtcla at the time of thr accident by "13.1' and the point of Impact by '1L' NOTE: If dugnrna blow do not fit the situation, attach berelo a proper dUtram signed by claimant. FOR OTHER ACCICENTS 31DEWALK cuaa -a ACURB PARKWAY 31DEWALK 7 FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS TF. taro of Claimant or psnon (lling on tdr b<Mlt U• wr Typed Name: Data Wwun hip to CialmanL• ' � v Morn Prosenca"On of a false elalat i felony (Cal. Pen. Code Sec. 72). CLAIMS MUST BE FILYD MITiM CIT RK (COV CODE SEC. 9I54). ' r A X� 9 ET A & R TIRE SERVICE 44626 WE SELL IMO OW7 CHECK FOR LESS 9U9 FOOTHILL BLVD. OUR PRICES YIOVM CUCAMONOA. CALIF. 91710 13' BLACK PHONE 997 -0917 r M / 11e , 13" WHITE NAME P.- GAT 11' BLACK 9 ET CAp dICK AYTB YCiL IMO OW7 � �,/ � � MAN M.2 MK] YIOVM 13' BLACK 13" WHITE 11' BLACK U' WHITE 13' BUCK 13' WHITE HAGS CHROME_ WHEELS v i t � sa 7 S a ' ALL TIRES ARE PRORATED: GUARANTEE IS VOID IF TYRE HAS BEEN TRUED. CLAIMS AAO ADJUSTMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED By TICKET. NO CASH RE:UND. T. 5 REGISTRATION FORMS FURNISHED TAY I TOTAL \_J 0 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY WelaLL We Ia( INSTRUCTIONS p pe I latermthanntoo daysoiitr ma oc�currenrso Govo Cora.. 9112) 1 be oleo not L Clamors for dawe" 1* real properly must be filed not later than I year after the occurance. (Gov. Cade her. gllU) 2. Read entire claim before Win& 4. See pate 2 for diagram upon which to locale plare of amident. 0. This claim torn must M signed on page 2 at bottom. 7 Attach a NN wIN CltKymCler�t. toot Cods Sec i13a�GN EACH SHEET. TO: t1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No, r.; t, - V?D CITY Cg'RANCRO CUC 44OPNZA AOM:NISTR,41 9t OCT 29 1971 AV PM 7181911011111211(213(,11,116 Give •sdress to which you desire MUm or e®imunteauona ro oe sons rapnmt sus c,ems: 9768 19th Street, post Office Box 342 Alta Loma, California 91701 How did DAMAGE or LNJURY otcurr Give full particulars intersection collision at 8:20 p.m , vehicle driven by claimant was struck by vehicle driven by another, a 1975 Chevrolet C- tering Truck. Claimant was operating a 1973 Volkswagen. i1 lJ Highway Patrol report number 991512 -11 for full or INJURY occur? Give full particular; date. Cme July 18, 1979 at 8:20 P.M. What* did DAMAGE or INJURY occuA Desulbe fully. and Irate on diagram on reverse side of this short. where appropriate, giv, street names and address and measurement, from lamtmarks: Intersection collision at Rochester Street and Arrow Highway at 8120 p.m. Claimant was struck broadside while in the intersection, collision forcing claimant's 1973 Volkswagen to the shoulder -- .s,_ ,.hex,. corner of Rochester and Arrow Richwav dcular ACT or OMISSION do u claim caused the iniury or damages Give rmmra 1Y C BtL Itnown• Failure of Cr�ty of Rancho Cucamon a to design, and maintain said intersection in a safe and prudent manner. What DAMAGE or INJURIES do you claim tnuited' Give full extent of Injuries or damages claimed: Massive head, chest and abdominal injuries. Claimant was comatose after said collision, claimant died on July 26, 1979. What AMOUNT do you claim an aeccunt of earn seen of m u,y or dame a as of d to of preIe ninon of thisecla mng basis. computation. As a result of the death o� claiman resul.tirg rTom poor main enance of said intersection, the estate of Frank Jamea Ronguillo claims damages in the amount of $2,000,000.00, said amount being, loss of earnings and giving s SEE PAGE 2 (OYFIU 4 0 THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE Sit ,tsuranca payments received. It any. and names Of Insurance Company: (Amount) 'sptMnum made on atswnl of accident or INurY: (Dale — Item) . None tome and address of Witnesses. Doctors and Hospitals: W - James Michael Teel,.456 Magnolia St., San Bernardino, CA D - San Antonio Community Hospital, Upland, CA Deputy Coroner Rubidoux, Autopsy by Wayne Scott, M.D. ROAD CAREFULLY Far all Occident claims Place an following diagram names of streets. Including North. East. South. and West; indicate Place of waldenl by "x, and by dwwtng hmnc "u"It" of dbbmo to struts csnucr.. U City Vehicle was Involve4 dui nUe by tsl:rr -A' location of City vehicle when YOU first saw It. and by -D' locallen of you nail it you. vehicle time of you first saw C tYB'!htde; .cMtt�l of �ItwrPK�cpYatxtimO of accident by 'A•l' and location of Youraell oe your the ,10TE. If diagrams below do not tit the situsdON attach hereto a Proper diagram signed by claimant — FOR OTHER ACCIDENTS I SIDEWALK — l J FOR AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS J U (JtKR,ow Kb () -7/ 71'\'�, N F Slenst"a of Claimant or Perm fit ng on his behalf giving Typed Name: Data rewtwnship to Claua.nt: Dennis R. Stout Attorney for Claimant 10 -26 -71 I , , Q�+•w Ll C NOTE r PYOSentatlyn of a false claim a felony (Col. Pen. Code Sec. 72).,,,�,,:y',. ,� _ PrArKC Kr)rT BE FILED MITI( CIT LEPK (Cov. CODE SEC. 915-1). A WORKSHOP FOR NEW CITY CLERKS This workshop is designed for relatively new City Clerks and • Deputy City Clerks who have not attended CEPO (Continuing Education for Public Officials). The program seeks to supplement educational needs of individuals performing the sta•utory and •miscellaneous duties of a City Clerk in municipal 9overnm2nt Actual examples and Illustrations from participants will be the basis for discussion so that participants can develop o realistic and useful understanding of successfully acia;nistering the Clerk's office. PROGRAM: Course content is designed to improve competency levels in the following key areas in a direct, practical, and funda- mental way. -- Statutory Requirements of a City Clerk -- Effective Time Management Tools -- Ca.munication Skills -- Recognizing Behaviors and Needs of Others -- Developing Administrative and tlanagerial ,abilities -- Recognizing Opportunities for Personal and arofessional Growth FACILITATORS: Pam Swift, Cer•ified Municipal Clerk, City Clerk, Bellflower, Director, Executive Board, SCCCA. Joann Jelly, Certified Municipal Clerx, City Clerk, La Habra, SCCCA Education Chairperson, League CEPO Representa- SCHEDULE: The lay day workshop will be conducted from 7:00 p.m., Live Fr'.day, November i6 , to 4:00 p.m., Saturday, November 17 , 1979. Participants should not plan to leave early LOCATION: The Registry Hotel, directly across from the Orange County Airport, HacAruthur Boulevard, Irvine. Reservations No. 714/752 -8777. FEE: The $75 fee includes enrollment and required study and refer- ence materials. Participants are responsible for the cost of transportation, hotel, and meals. Make check payable to Pamela S. Swift and include with enrollment form. NOTE: An intone tax deduction is allowed for expenses of education not paid by employers including registration fees, travel, meals, and lodging undertaken to maintain and Improve professional skills. CERTIFICATE: A certificate of completion is awarded to participants, is suitable for framing and will serve as one point toward IIHC Certification requirements through the Education Courses and In- Service Training Category. *ENROLLMENT FORM 'Enrollment is limited to 12 participants and will be accepted in the order received. NEW CITY CLERKS WORKSHOP NOV. 16 - 17 , 1979 NAME: ® POSITION/TITLE•_ ORGANIZATION: ADDRESS: Z1 TELEPHONE: ( ) MAIL TO: Pamela S. Swift, CMC City Clerk City of Bellflower 9838 E. Belmont St Bellflower, CA 90706 or call for additional information: 213/866 -9003 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 MEMORANDUM DATES November 07, 1979 TO: City Council and City Hanager FROM: Lloyd B. Eubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Traffic signals at Base Line and Hellman Avenue and Archibald and Church Street Design plena have been completed on the above referenced traffic signals and approval from CALTRANS has been received to advertise for award of the cortract These signals well be 100% funded through Federal Aid Urban funding to be received as the project progresses The Engineers Estimate for both signals is $160,000. Bide will be opened In late December and construction would begin in late Spring. RKOPNENDATIONt • It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Engineering Division to advertise fpr bids for the construction of traffic signals me the inter- section of Base Line and Hellman Avenue and at Church Street and Archibald Avenue. Respectfully Sub tted, B. Ilubbs City Engineer LB11: cd 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NE4OMR)UY DATE, November 7, 1979 Ttl, City Council and City Managoe PRDH, Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT, REDUCED SPEED LIMIT ON HIGHLAND AVENUE At its October 9, 1979 seating, the City's Tra.fic Cour ittee recomsended that a 15 MPH speed limit be established on Highland Avenue betvae., Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue. A copy of that report is attached for yocr reference. If the Committee's recommendation is acceptable, the attached recolution. as required by Ordinance 19, is provided fo. your approval Respectfully submitted``, • �t.1% Hobbs, City Engineer LN,PAR,cc Rnncho Cucam ,qa Traffic Cooeai.tee October 9. 1979 Item 2 LOCATION. Highland Avenue between Amethyst Street and Archibald Avenue REOUEST• Reduced Speed Zone DATA. This portion of Highland Avenue is S mile long The westerly part is a narrow, partial width street, about 24' vide, with houses on 'he north s Se and a citrus grove on the south side Tne easterly part is full ridth with houses on both sides The n=ber of residences does not meet legal xegairemorts for a 25 MPH zone A rpeed zone survey resulted In a prevailing speed of le MPI1 during off -peak hours Traffic volume is about 1200 care a day Tilers have been no reported nccidrnta In the last 2 years. During cocouter peak hours. spend of some traffic is 40 to 45 MPH RECOK.ICHDATIOU A 15 MPiI speed zone should be established to make radar speed enforcement passible A no parking zone should elan be established through the narrow portion wl-ere Mn asphalt n.rb prevents vehicles from parking off the roadway x. • 0 • I I !� F I I � CO .J w.� I w ( � S � I � I � a I� d �! a 1 �a I 0 I i J F o z s 4 Y t Ev I--. Wj -�� I 0 I i J F o z s 4 Y t I 0 I i J • RPSOUMOU NO. 79 -91 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUH:IL Cr THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC1710HGA, CALIPOM A, TO ESTABLISH SPEED UNIT ON HIGHLAND AVONE TO 35 NPH BETWEE11 AMETHYST STREET AND ARCHIBALD AVTIAUE The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does roaolvc as follows, WHEREAS, due to conditions affecting the welfare of the public uti-icir,q Highland Avenue, and based on Eng'-. .caring and Traffic studies on the route, the City Engineer is hereby directed to perform such acts as necessary to accoplish the following, Pursuant to City Ordinance, To establish a 35 mph speed tone on Higtland Avenue from, Amethyst Street Co Archibald Avenue PASSED APPROVED, and ADOPTED the 7th day of November, 1979 by the City Council of the City of oancho Cucamonga. State of California, by the following vote, • AYES, HOES: ABSEU1r Hayor, Rancho Cucaaon,73 ATMIT, City Clerk , 13 M,Ii I. LYII i(C.♦, Ct �.JI YJ .F mr Y Y S s y t • ♦ yw♦ y� • MI ...n.♦ L. P o � t FYt •� M t q i rI 1 � R 6i •: yr � n : :� � {.we •o 17T • � ir, 1 _ n>V re. •. •.. .. v ... a <.. r. �.• , " !1 - <•t�+; ii F♦.n - - -- �� .,. ", FIX rr -. w,w ��: LO IV v owv. <, M... '0 � NlY w ' M KIY ..I,. ..sYt 4 ,•4 •r.. Rl f R• 4 ^•61 S ,r IR ... tw w <, rye:•( 41' i 11 K PIS /S LM 8fAgVG5 A \D '•J45 /♦'- 6i •: yr � n : :� � {.we •o 17T • � ir, 1 _ n>V re. •. •.. .. v ... a <.. M7 M! ml _;• �..'v `• � ! ..•r [, h':" "" ►+•i -�f8 i f� ' Sill � � '-QJ 3I!1 i ♦;� .. po ..... �j4J � +• f ,. .. �y g! . is g za' t a _ i + (� _ �y ! i �jl1 ~8t: •i Sz "•. �'i =�...• ;l I :b �i �y tat � °f w:[s, i. o69 SI �= ~0= =r:e If li ' [_ Y _ .y •= t! I .$ 1 !I '74 [F��4� a'y 1, •"! '_, i'= ^A ,jl' .I! 3 ".f,{ -, C'"' " X11 �_.... �.• ai+,D• [ +1 °•!� 1 �� \ I lrr. nr) JJ � r • � ' ' t' ��i:� • r Is ! 1S y n ? - i� ♦ y,: �. nN: n°^• •T {!•_p� t It !i 'fit i ` f . 1 k [ ! t = I I� �•_ � � � I �= 1.11 _� i s c t eoir: n+ , r ap.tr� •6_ �`.t -4 ``.s' _, ►. _ ",_' :l.i ifiiiiiiils Mw a g JJ 1 ] •fir• [�! ,I�: t � I I ei r v i � ^ 2' I •I I i • � � . �^w � : 4 "� Ji Mn\n � - an.nxt� :\:{ � � =•.. \' 13t T TILE C d 140, 381 .zlocl.rz• rrla.rr.f Ix ix[ cau.lr or ss1 Eta ■t 10 1•a owrwo, aurale. IEIK S RWIIISM^a 6 Ml:od 6 LM 11 S•S rWAMr WSS r W1, ca'S ••1(1 b 7 U 1[[ooa 11 OM K' OF Mai •r1 M C• coy V w mm" Q SI1 Kftwte 1119[ 6 muo la N • 5 I f =I �'« .. — —'a t ^.r: C.•a, �� mss_.. I I i Y •-• ��1na'J •`'r ' �^�F � 12 r aorc.w z arts .o u¢ra �7 - I •••• y _I tea.- - • �� • a • u a j 11 � f• D I I J I t �! /I D �' ii K • 5 I f =I �'« .. — —'a t ^.r: C.•a, �� mss_.. I I i Y •-• ��1na'J •`'r ' �^�F � 12 r aorc.w z arts .o u¢ra �7 I litAu JL 14 we 7.301 .IIOCI.TIN INCI.IIII IN THE COUNTY OF SIN Sa SNSSOI%o b��n,<.uYpry RINC S SUROMS101 R 1O1 @0 7 'M .T S .S f0ltM (NOSt,SiS ,WT M RCS H M CONT1 6 SW R MIND 3� 6 CASUDWIll T R• b (T fa .�.. Tb 9R L i dH ....... ... � Jf 11:1 -0 -- �5 4 1 r off- r_r n E �• o �' 1. ^ •�. A, I.J i .d� }�`I p A =may,: ,..�11 sTr.1-'1{ • g � i � � • .e�°' ti � ���..� mow' O \ . 10 LA j •r 9c a yi •-t 'F� 'aj j�7yw s_�L_`l ..T. .+1�i =. I Tull 1 1V 51 ;0190A IM I11 COY II! 0r 311 0111110110 KIK 1 MIIISI01 6 WIIM 6 LM .T S N /OOMIM / Fuu /m1i 10'3 "XI 10 S 1S n=M OI 106 20 6 OIO! O1Q H 4 M0 7 M MO 7 w mummies. SI1i1 Q MVOWA tl 1 _ d� :� r Q i ivr. n 7 ..l:.r r• y ASSOCIAT90 IM4IMI111 WI11q. awl t� •4 r 1 rI L .ry\ / Rif IYV• .J.fL✓ 4V TNEC?t TI.'/Y /Y[V V.V.:: FAAPD.YD NNII .�Mlln nt'lYP •. Mme 1/.VII I V. I /•VM1 W fNl( /III/ >'(II•• r+•w/ • Lf Vff.. EY .Y' T r 16V / •. J ii,Y / VpL • ,HO ,•� • M1 IYK YI I.K / 1 C ..I•MN• .If• \� � �•K�f.. .let, .Y...f NLLf., ... 1 �� a[a[ <i,�Jrw[[P ilp� u• 57L �__�i J�f♦` l /t . rewtn♦ f VN rL.• � M /I i't .Vi 1 %uw• t��i I it 7i P z i v 4 � I- WRA56 a- 6£ARIAGS AND Wr£S NIIr //Y rlVfa r.f rn P.tl�'111.f I•Y.rn .11•'•11.1 11/ .I .n.n J1 • 1.Knn Lsvilf .w 11 i 1• n.1 n. ..u. .: �1v o .L•,� .vur raLV wn I•It1'/! r -1I ll/ I.f 4 yI ) V •I/ •• Y Igr.nl IS �Nn /1! ..f.1 Yn• 11�.•.11'fd. /L'1t! lta °6tf O r!//(�lr l.fl ar.(p1.n OrY OlrrlYy�,r fLY ryflf! LMT• fLwf 9• • q.f j� Lj I/ I•Y(11n fM /I M/t IY1 rill l.l� L ILL[L 1MYlrf 1f. K1.IiVlMfr (!!VN N•I.IM elL K./!f I1tNN 1r I11r1 YM I /Ifl f<tlL Lll f . }•{ $C(_ ?.•r .ur,•- : •- IV.:nu ae u nu - rr/.r/f a ✓f • , j `y V •1111 .MfJli •'• S•IN Y I I •7� I IItD ..-.. "wl �a I I /, - f�•9 I 128/26-27 'N 4 M B i s r P• 1 NO 919 / ; ". TRACT r. A ` WRA56 a- 6£ARIAGS AND Wr£S NIIr //Y rlVfa r.f rn P.tl�'111.f I•Y.rn .11•'•11.1 11/ .I .n.n J1 • 1.Knn Lsvilf .w 11 i 1• n.1 n. ..u. .: �1v o .L•,� .vur raLV wn I•It1'/! r -1I ll/ I.f 4 yI ) V •I/ •• Y Igr.nl IS �Nn /1! ..f.1 Yn• 11�.•.11'fd. /L'1t! lta °6tf O r!//(�lr l.fl ar.(p1.n OrY OlrrlYy�,r fLY ryflf! LMT• fLwf 9• • q.f j� Lj I/ I•Y(11n fM /I M/t IY1 rill l.l� L ILL[L 1MYlrf 1f. K1.IiVlMfr (!!VN N•I.IM elL K./!f I1tNN 1r I11r1 YM I /Ifl f<tlL Lll f . }•{ $C(_ ?.•r .ur,•- : •- IV.:nu ae u nu - rr/.r/f a ✓f TRACT ISO. 9595 IN UNNCOpPORA7ED rERRIIOW OF INE COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO Bt/VG A SUBDIVISION Of POPEIONS Of LOTS 3 ANJ a BLOCK /I• CUCAMONCA NOVWEAD ASSOCIATION. AS PER MAP P£CORLYO IN BOOK 6. PACE 46 W MAPS. RECORDS Of 7HE CO/NTY Or SAV BERNANDINO SrArf LY CALIFORNIA ANDREASEN ENG/N[ERING CO SCALE A /DO' DECEMBER 976 N01r, �•�a •I • Nl. �i•/nIN�.1 M1N. rl•H{Y w•. 11I /1[ 11 .J ii•••VMMMMe��YYRRTTTTtt • IV \ ! !'.l' NIaN II...• 1[ Ir. h . \N . .Y .hM r [.t HH u .•I .I • N I.ul'/r.•n. .I .l\ • h IJ ter• •w•1... .JN IuNN1 u N [ 1 .N.• V•r.[ ..11 h I.1.f h•.I. [III.. I nIN • . I.Y f•• \ t..Np'� .•1. Yw1 H » N . •..rt � n Ir •bW w [tai ••••L, ✓n [.rhY Y•py.•� r.••.»• a I•l �.• Iltn CIYYr PSr. _ —tom •.i ,I/ p nH rravrr t!JN INl K' . Mr .4ntT 3' .� . tK lvrr• +^ rlL r �``�,I• .I"I. NIr n... •r I.I .IY.I . M [T I! R[MA/NDLR PARCEL Is r H Y• °N) Tjii:F;�jl xr- •Il• t1'I:r;� Jwtr •Y. { ' :. •I•i .f II .r /qtr NIv �A' °(pjir` , f ryAT ti �• Y � `� ,f �[ t Yie` lr. l.x [I' I .rl f S1 L^1 t': IL :� H t.• J i U ¢ H Ci n_ y •L II.YIN f)IlL a r I'll •!I) n/IN•l ry ilt ,w u. ..• l• I,ICIIY(KD 1 /MM1(ry, .I u Jt a� IY 1p a I �• r i ii •cif'• �• \t I Sy .Ir Yyil p I R 1 I t • T�""t'�ifinLi `. H : M �jfALLr •I/ �,II FRACT NO. T596 IN ME C iY OJ RANCHO CVCAI •GA CA.'Ir ORNIA BE /AG A SVBOIV/SIGN Ol PONrIONS O} 11`19 S INO 6. BI OCK /r, LM %ONGA HOMISCCAO AsSOCIAPON• AS IYR 'AP 8111: „•10 /N eVOK 6• PAGE 46 OK VMS. 1. WWS LY 'HE LIY.NJY Of SAN ALAAWO.•/Ct SrACC 00' CALI007NIA ANORCASEA' ENGUMERIMG CO SCALE 1SI00' OLYEVBER /L'lb ngrrt 1 !.N \) . 1.1•' . r I•, IN r••N111•. .IW • N Y•e.y NI • s•1 VI\Y I •NN • f•! I;\•� .III '•N y •N �/ • N• 1 •INI•IN lJ I..III.. N �. rw•V NIVIN Iw "'I \Ilw •III .f t Or•• 4�. • C 9. /"1111 JS St .rrrrj Ni r, it t • /. •:/I.J •r , :• � F •� /: _I 'lr••. _ti.H l_ t �({rl.y �1� -) ' �i 1.-vM.am N m • r^N.i-,:N r I- _❑.I1m 1.J r E. , w ,rrJV .a_ iy�Y 'I rt v /l+rw,^ar• • � ! ,, H•n rr-{ >"M ,� r. r1Yr1 /....1.» \1� ,} :♦ HI fr • i . wr•c� :�a r •T ! { 1 �•Q 9 .9•• Y •/ s'•/r }.. { 19 Y it I! • I.I IJ ?. I' !;H �Y IGIS !`wr 1 �' y7•I� 7 t Y �1 i? • T'7 4 g C uyA• T1 t • • /j •: •'a' 1 <, ' ,I I j-f )1 V`��1 �' / rrr.. /�I u1' v� • �+y f r; 7� -. � 1 �� J•I L aI t! ua '�1�1jHM f,i \ tt •/' `j � /+ • /'.� • r ,�• �4t l iiu 'i1iu rt -.'a H • N t If / j Y •i I / 1 }9j f ♦;;ai ..r..lj � p tti Y t�?.\ S� ?�• '•,t�•Irru/•vo- li. ".," r �� r,rl `u rrn. \: N:rriii'r1 xi ✓V Na Cl9S .. •.1 CITY OF RANC90 CUCAI :ONCA 0 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 07, 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engine SUBJECT[ Parcel Nap 4463 (Agreement Extension) The subject Parcel tiap was tentatively approved by the County on February 15, 1978 Tito Final map with an Improvement Agreement was approved by the City Council on October 18, 1978 The security offered at the time of approval was a passbook in the name of the City for $5,000 00. The owner had previously obtained a County Construction Permit (No E -11329 dated: 8 -08 -78) and n subsequent extension approval (see letter) on October 03, 1978 Please note the owner had told County that work would commonce in early 1979 To date, nothing has been done The owner had advised the City and the County In October 1978 that the con - dtructfon of the required street improvements should be delayed The reason for the delay was the existence of a Cucamonga County Water District Weir box and a request.by C.0 W D. that it Tema In until the determination as to its usefulness, relocation, and /or removal Letters between the C C.W.D and the Owner have indicated that the Owner may remove the weir box and attach pipelines at the owners expense and convenience The last correspondence Iron C.C.W.D to the Owner clarifying this statement was on November 3, 1978 (see attached letter to City from Omer dated 9- 26 -78) The attached letter, of request of extention of agreement, was submitted 12 days after the default of e.�reement date. The Owner was given a copy of the agreement on October 1978 after the City Clerk accepted the Passbook RECO ISDATION Due to problems that have verbally been expressed to the Engineering staff it is recormmnded that Council: I ElimLna.c the sidewalk requirement 2 Apprnvt a 6 month extension en the agreement Require an Increase in the deposit to current costa At the end of 6 months tine. If progresq to complete the improvements in mtsotlofaetory, we recommend Council take action to call the bond and have the work performed in accordance with the Conditions of approval 023 :�s ���� Q-t. G���� �� �,C�p rte' rs*^, e�[.e�.�!'_"_ yi•N WzaEIifEll 9 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY OEVEIOPUINT DEPT. "y •?�.J}� OCT 301979 rc k 7181911O18F1T1112F3F415 6 H►l...d M►ial TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT County of WORM ardina lf - %IBCWOAAS A CEHE'f . �`.` L.' M' d^ �'. S' Ti 'r".2""r;,"s$e�.:C•-.- '�"i --isr �E'�r:i'v7E. ^.i.E.:i:s3 „' e�.. W Third Strut • San Bernardino, CA 92415 (710383-1-265 aa.w, R. e.ONE ,'/ r aY„tr el t,w,ygr,l4n nY October 3, 1978 w, i. Mr, Robert Mac Dona'd 5335 'brth Carnollar ofreat a Rancho Cucamonga, California 9i701 Sa N, PJ:: P•oposed Road Improvements, Carnelian Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, Permit A: No. E- 11329, dated August 8, 1978 •: 'II• h ,y Eaar Hr, Mac Donald: This latter Is in answer to your Inquiry received in this office on Septom- bar 25, 1978, requesting permission to delay construction and Installation of 331 L.F of curb and gutter and other - elated road iaprovematnts along , t',e east side of Carnelian Avenue north of Hillside in the Rancho Cucamonga area we have no objection to your dolaylna until early part of 1979 construction j4 and Installatlon of the required road Improvements We understand the t concern of the Cucamonga Ccunty Hater District relative to the use of the 0 weir box for the remelnlnq groves existing In that area As A :cpv of that letter will be forwarded to the County Planning Department ell Ielat •R to yrwr Minor Subdivision No. 77 -0464 for their 'nformation and u,danco If we caa be of further service or have any questions regarding this project, please do not hesitate to tali us at (714) 383 -1557. R Sincerely, i4 ^ JOHN R. SHONE - DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION FS Ely S. Ferry Q :w •mit Engineer IN n• JSF:kf t . •�„ 6 7 6 .'rc- 1Q , cc:— <nvlronmental Improvement Agency ? ' Planning Department, Most Val lei Plenners h�Q 1P,:• LO Land development Section Cy 2ermeno Cucamonga County Motor District George Blanchard 2 ••_ i v• City of Rancho Cucamonga Lloyd Hubbsl ��J'' [aRt LOOO1wM a.w.a,a RoaIRTo TONN:EN awU pnY[I Jel R�MA,ISRY iRe..a am.%>.j i Y,_1_•bwNY OE RN�RO na++wnrw OtNN,S HANfaE RCER TAN MwKr, 3 TY�% nla. ra., ayw, In u[ <1�`wngn rnu n., r, IwM UatnwN[ iaM D.x r, NOD CU T H CCITY OMMUNITY DEPT S33S� SEP 28 1978�� AM P,819I01111X 13191516 l3E�F.l9lp0! )�� ��• "' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIJGNCA 40S71NISTRI1110N V. SEP 28 1978 iI 1� I/ A `i 715181 )0Iu1LI11121314,516 ;'�'f ov � 4��✓ ✓ `i Cam, �uic�GUO.L �G .V- LitC�F�' %��! Ile& lot-f- �` D,t,u -;�. Z ,oll ���� •.rte vim[' nvay�' i; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AGENCY R. w ..- .........+...��e..�n+j.+.+'v T•'l'C�T.�CC�fJ. �I{rx�O'... .w+•...,..,j I.. .....y "PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1171 EAR 61.11 SUM. Bldg 1 San 9emald.no• CA92415 17141 3n1417 ydY1" zl{ February 23, 1978 Robert MacDonald 7931 Spinel Cucamonge, Ca 91730 4P417 of San Bernardino Kem itiC Tape.q rJw.wL D•nro Re: Minor Subdivision No. W77 -0464 Dear Mr. MacDonald: Th.s is to advise you that your Minor Subdivision dpplication war conditionally approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council _ at its meeting of February 15, 1978 Said li.nor Subdivision application was found to be in compliance with Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act and was approved subject to your completion of the requirements as set forth on the attached shcet(s). All requirements spe::ified on the attached sheet(s) shall be met within one (1) year after the date of this letter, or the conditional approval is void An extension of time not to exceed one (1) year may be granted upon written application to the Rancho CJlcnmong3 Planning Cournission not less than thirty (30) calendar days pr'or to the date of expiration.. The lots proposed by your Minor Subdivision application cannot be legally divided, recorded of sold until the requirements listed have been completed and your application h3a been given "Final Approval" signed by the Planning Director Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL. IMPROVEMCNf AGENCY cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga PLANNING DEPARTMENT Co. Transportation(2) Co. Flood Control s: Clo: Surveyor Foothill Fire District John Perevpz7(ik Associate Planner Associated Engineers v West Valley Planni -v 316 East "E' Street Ontario, Ca. 91764 JP:nk encl.: as noted nbovc EARL GOMM% ad nl 4ya era.. 1...•q AIGN".•.•r•Jb . NORf H1U LMYK.I IJU {�{ Wx,r JU[RAIIASD R•rwlD""<1 POOL NIa RIGNN' A........n m" nwn... _ / UI hNJi 11NJ5D[RGEn IbADnb•Jl Ce• a,nU l..p u.ea•rl Anrr". JANESI NAY IIIIO f 'Iwn"1 1100 HALWOLC Ed11r Oe1vl -•c Q r S D Iq L i 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ii 12 13 14 is 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 di 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 I 55 56 Rancho Cucamonga City Council Feb 17, 1978 MS: w77 -0464 Mac Donald 11' graft of easement to the County of San Bernardino required for Carnelian Street to provide 44' half -width right -of -way as shown on Minor Subdivision plat map. Paving, curbs, gutters and sidewalks shall be installed or Carnelian Street. Plans for all improvements must be approved by the San Bernar- dino County Road Oepartment prior to installation of said improvements. A cash deposit or bond may be placed with the County Road Department to fulfill this requirement. Circular driveways shall he provided along Carnelian Street frontage to avoid vehicular traffic backing onto a proposed secondary highway. The following are Flood Control District requirements and shall be accomplished prior to granting final approval of this application: Adequate provisions shall be provided along the north site boundary to intercept and conduct the local drainage flows around or through the site in such a manner that will not adeve -sely affect adjacent or downstream properties Adequate provisions shall be provided along the west boundary to reduce the possibility of Carneliar. Avenue street flaws from entering the site, curb and gutter constructed along the street should provide the necessary protection Applicant shall provide a fire protection water system in accordarce wtlh Foothill Fire District standards and shall comply with the attached Focthill Fire District requirements. Applicant shall obtain and forward to the Planning Department a letter fror the serving water company certifying that capacity for this pro- ject has been reserved for a minimum period of one (1) year. Upon completion of all other conditions, a parcel map of the proposed division shall be recorded with the County Recorder pursuant to pro- visions of the State Map Act. (Note: This map must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or a Registered Civil Engineer.) An advance copy of the parcel map may be submitted to the County Surveyor to expedite checking, but the County Surveyor will not accept tha linen for presentation to the County Recorder for filing until notified by the Planning Director that your Minor Subdivision application is in order for final approval. The parcel map is required due to insufficient survey data recorded with the County of San Bernardino. q.uo"u C�7_ < < City of R ANCHO s CUCAMONGA November 7, 1978 fir Bob MacDonald 537: Nurth Carnelian Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Dear Bob: Please be advised that the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga signed the improvement agreement between you and the City on October 30, 1978 This now assures us that the off site improvements required of your land division w!11 be installed The $ 5,000 00 you have placed at our diapuval for the installation of these improvements will be refunded alter conatruc- tion has been approved Please be advised that the Permit Fee will be computed at the time of Issuance. If you have any questions, please contact the underslRned at 989 -1851 CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA LIO1D IIi -BRR CITY ENGINNEE�E/R L�f /�/ij/{ {y] By: J.•hn L Kirtln Eng tnucr Ing Tcchnlclnn IA:JH:dcb • 3 RESOLUTION N0. 78 -59 • A Rv.SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP HO. 4463, (TENTATIVE Pt.CEL HAP N0. 4463) AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVFHEMT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVTME;T SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Hap No 4463, submitted by Robert Mac Donald subdivider, and consisting of three (3) parcels, located the side of Carnolian north of Hillside being a division of Cucamonga Home- stead Association was approved by the Planning Commission of San Bernardino County on February 15, 1978, as provided in the State Subdivision Map Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map No 4463 is the Final Hap of the division of land approved as shown bn said tentative parcel map; and .mEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval )f the Final Map, said Subdivider has o•fcred the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by snld City, - together with goad and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon; ® NOV, THEREFORE, BE If RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1 That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor to authorized to execute .ame on behalf of said City, and the City Clerk is authorized to attes' thereto; and, 2 That the offers for dedication and the Final Hap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and, 3. That said Parcel Map No. 4463 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1978. ec fi�- -rwyor Rancho Cucamonga 0 ATTEST: v .�I Y LAND nIWISIDN APrLJr 11 TUN • wcnn•tnul"U UUUtl1 T YLANTI IU UtFAHTMENT 11 \ "WO -I i V' Q i JP ✓i.d �ai. �rf'd r� I n 4 � I , 'I• V Ttl (21 4 � \I ` I,1 re. eo W � i 4 I • Ex'J'Ae Nur Lax I ti APr11cA:lr fps 1 1 + Name Robert T1acoonold Phone .21, 7 -3442 1'nwf Address., Spinet, Cucannnw Ca 71730 99pp ��i,ty.Lti I LEG \L • I;ER UP RECVRD — —r Nxr Rnl+•rt Ilac[bna_Id _ M onr n07 -3442 ,4 SK;N 4. Adctes• 7731 Sylncl, Coraln`n7a, Co 717:d yUP PPr r \FAD PY Rax__ASwc in trd rme t nrrr r..- Addrras 314 Cast "r "r =5t , unl.a, lu. 0 - I I t iOL\1 •:n. LhTe t y:.; - , s u •: t. n,l• +t- 24I -n% 1 1' SECI I' "1,+OW:.S111 P ,L D rv:,E - 1• F_IU p!ti SOURCE, ri LATER SGPPL, t ur .gym mgt, l_• Water Diet t Milm DP SEWAGE DISrOSAL Srnt tc Tank P cesstml •• ,.� i `l 1 I certify chat I nm the (check one)CBJ legal owner• II• CJhis authorized sgcnt and •1•4t the information a+ shor "erect, is true and correct to the best of my ' S. i - knowledge� Signed: / \[t•ri� S of /i /.f� I i� %c 't NW H .- r sa• MaP Sole i 1 ..0 1 1� O 1 s r 0 t • CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 07, 1979 TO: City Council and City Hanagcr FR%1: Lloyd E Hobbs, City Englnee5 yrd � V SUBJECT: Parcel Hap 5265 (Approval) The sub]e.t Farczl Hap was tentatively approved by the Comittee on February 15, 1978 Due to the timing of moratorium and available staff to handle subdivision this map was allowed processing. Th subdivision as for 4 lots North of Hillside and East of Carnelia:„ convistioLt of 5 acres. - The Developer, h d S Properties, has supplied the City with securities sufficient In nature to guarantee installation of required street Improvements • Perfo=ace (Letter of Credit) $40,500 00 Labor and Material (Letter :f Credit) $40,500.00 Recommendation: It is recoeaended that the City Council approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to sign the Map and Agreement on behalf of the City, thereby accepting the Streets offered for dedication, further authorizing the City Engineer to forward the Map for recording LBH: cd 23 • RESOLUTION NO 79 -90 A RESOLUTION OF THE MY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PA^.CEL MAP NUMBER 5269, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 77 -0590) IMPROVEMENT AGREENEHT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, rentative Parcel Hap (lumber 77 -0590, submitted by H. E S. Propertys Subdivider, and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the north side of Hillside East of Carnelian at Via E1 Dorado being a division of a portion of Lot 6, Block 13 Cucamonga Homestead Tract was approved by the Planning Commission of San Beraardino County on February 15, 1978, as provided in the State Subdivision Hap Act and is in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and, WHEREAS, Pdreel Hap Number .2;9 is the Final Nap of the division of land approved as shown on said ;•:ncative parcel map; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Hap, said subdivider subaits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon, • NOW. THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows; 1 That the offers for dedication and the Final Hap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and, 2. That said Parcel Map Number 5263 be aad the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979. ALES: NOES ABSENT: Mayor 0 ATTEST: -' City Clerk �� • ,ArIU DIVIS" )1) AFPLICAFIOf7 ERffARDINO COW IrY PLAMING DEPARTMENT , i li I .VIP. F/ ne.�do • � // r r..•gF•Gr wA✓ Ret d� l4) 71"1 ro I t, rc , H / ROi.91 AP ?LIC•L•II .I=e 7. ✓ ��.1'.ns/Lt- 171••Ilr �E' -SFL ECAL t -1.7e •'• >/ l- E,•�(r PLonc 4f�4 il•Y7 /ss 1P P "ZPAIIQD RY: 4> 1 a 4 t ?ru�os_d PY /` tfln� A_"_4 map ualo (Office Use Ally) L D. •:O ZMF I � FEE RECEIPF :10• S1 /l•I /- Ylvn n9.ttr /• - •r riff •. ;ry•i S Ii I 10 7// , i li I .VIP. F/ ne.�do • � // r r..•gF•Gr wA✓ Ret d� l4) 71"1 ro I t, rc , H / ROi.91 AP ?LIC•L•II .I=e 7. ✓ ��.1'.ns/Lt- 171••Ilr �E' -SFL ECAL t -1.7e •'• >/ l- E,•�(r PLonc 4f�4 il•Y7 /ss 1P P "ZPAIIQD RY: 4> 1 a 4 t ?ru�os_d PY /` tfln� A_"_4 map ualo (Office Use Ally) L D. •:O ZMF FEE RECEIPF :10• S1 /l•I /- Ylvn n9.ttr /• - •r riff •. 0 ♦ 1 .t/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA?1ONGA 1:0.1 JMxU Date: October 17, 1979 To: City Manager And Members of the City Council Prom: Jack tam, Director of Community Development Subject: DESIGN REVIEW ORDINANCE - An Ordinance establishing a Design Review Committee and Criteria for Architectural Review for development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga BACKGROUND: Under the direction of the Planning Commission, Staff has prepared a Design Revica• Ordinance for your consideration. Based upon discussions and special study sessions and public hearings Feld with the Planning Commission, the attached Ordinance has been formulated Generally, the Ordinance creates a Design Review Committee consisting of two Planning Commission members and the Director of Coamunity Development or his designee Tle Committee meets twice monthly or more. often if needed The time of the meetings shall be set by Reno - lutlon of the Ilannirg Commission As Commmt•c� members change, there say be •need for change in the meeting time depending upon the ability of the Cotmittee to meet Therefore, a R ^solution setting the meeting time can be easily changed to meet the needs of the Committee. The Ordinance also sere forth criteria which the Committee will use in reviewing the design of a project. In addition to the criteria listed In the Ordinance; the Ordinance gives the authority to the Committee to develop further design cri- teria and elmsnts. The Planning Commission, at its meting of September 26, 1979, held a public hearing to consider public testimony on the proposed ordinance. Upon completion of the public hearing and review of the Ordinance by the Planning Commission, they recommended adoption of the Ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Part I of the - nitial Study is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has found no significant adverse impac to on the em meant as a result of this proposal. RECO.MENDATION Thu Planning , mission recccrinds adoption of the attached Ordi- nance and issumce of a Negative Declaration. Respect y nub itced, JACK LA.N, Director of Ar, Community Development JL:MVtma Attachments: Part I, I±! teal Study �+ 7 City Council Or11 -lace �[I C •• CLTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this font must be completed and submitted to the Developoent Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of '" , application, the Environmental Analysis staff .ii prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development I4•.ev Committee will -meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meet. _ at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no - environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied . by the appllcan,. giving further information concerning the proposed project. i Wei APPLICA. \T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: CM CF (2AAY,i Yi / 11 /1L1,w_w /M1SA W �. .- .. NAME. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _LAOS- LAM. 01RP11FF* qc l/1AAA111h1tN 4�@1Q17RtAf9ar LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) hbn:e LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, PXGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUI::G SUCH PERMITSz A 14.6 to I -1 C • PROJECT DESCRIP ^ION 11 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: L40A)P , DESCRIBE THE ENVIRf)NMZNrAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFO"]ATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANES (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERCIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF A.i EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): G(TV OF RAAZ4YJ (Ud6 MrnQ6A Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a scriec of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significancoironmental impact? z -2 3-F HILL ^'RIS PROJECT: YES W� 1. Create a substantial chanoe in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or' general plan designations? 5: Remove any existing trees? tiow many? / 6. Create the need for use or disposal of � potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. • CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for thin initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the beat of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitte, before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Devalapment Review Committee. Date Signature f %g Signature_ Title • ORDINANCE 90. 89 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCUO CUCANO.NGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE WHICH ESTABLISHES A DESIGN REYM COMMITTEE AND DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: That the Planning C Pon ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did by its Resolution No 79 -61 following a public hearing held in the time and manner described by law recommend the eotabltahment of a design review procedure and committee hereinafter described and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner described by law and has duly heard and considered sa,d recommendation D That the City Council has reviewed and cunsidered the Design Review Ordinance and all testimony and comments pertaining to it and find. the Design Review procedures to be adequate In scope and content C That the Design Review Ordinance will have no significant environmental impact as provided In the negative declaration filed herein SECTION 2: PURPOSES The City of Rancho Cucamonga finds that a design review process will support the implementation of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, as it stresses quality urban design standards. The City further finds that the quality of certain residential, Institutional, commercial, and industrial uses has a substantial Impact upon the visual appeal, environmental soundness, economic stability, and property values of the City This Ordinance is not intended to restrt -t Imagination, innovation or variety, but rather to focus on design principles which can result In creative imaglnattvo solutlors for [ho Project and a quality design for the Clay It is, therefore, the purpnso of tills Resolution to: Re.ogntze the Interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a mothod by Mitch the Clh m.ty tnplemc..t this Interdependence to its benctit 2 Encourage the arderly and harmonious appearance of ® structures and property within the City along with aasoclated facilities such as sigls, landscaping, parking areas, and streets 1V Ordinance No. 89 Pape 2 3 Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare, and property throughout the City. • 4 Assist private and public developments to be more cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of developments S Reasonably ensure that new developments, including residential, Institutional, commercial and industrial developments, do net have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety or architecturally related impact upon existing adjoining properties, or the City In general 6 Implement those st [ions of the City's General Plan which specifically reicr to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique asadts of this City and its harmonious development SECr104 3: CRFATION OF THE DESIGN RVIIESl COMMITTEE A A Design Review Committee (DRC) 1s hereby created and shall be responsible for the implementation and adminib!ration of this Ordinance. 1 Composition The Design Review Committee shall consist of three (3) memberq One shall be the Director of Community Development or his designee and two shall be members of the Planning Commission 2 Appointment and Term cf Office The Plann.ng Commission shall elect two of Its members to the DRC The Director of Community Development or his designee shall be the Secretary of the DRC. Of the first two Commlasion members appointed, one ahall have a term of six (6) months and the other shall have a to= of twelve (12) months Thereafter, all terms shall be twelve (12) months 3 Removal from Office Any member of th- Committee may be removed at any time by the Planning Commission 4 Meetings The Design Review Committee shall meet twice monthly, as needed The time and place of such meeting shall be set by Renolution of the Planning Commission The Design Review Committee may arrange additional meetings • or any time in order to process applications within required time periods 41E Ordinance No. 89 Page 1 5. Rules A simple majority of members shall constitute a quorum. The Committee shall review a project in accordance with the Ordinance and file recommendations with the approving authority Such recommendations shall be consolidatA by the Planning Division of the Cumaunity Development Department as conditions for final approval The DAL shall have the right to develop its own rules and regulations for conducting Its meetings in addition to developing and adopting design criteria and standards. SECTION 4: JURISDICTION OF REVIEW A The Design Review Committee shalt have the authority to review the architecture and site plan elements of all residential, commercial and industrial developments, additions, remodeling,, relocations. Issuance of a building permit or which require a Conditinnal Use Permit, Site Approval or Director Review The review shall consider the use of design elements such as, but nqt limited to, exterior design and wterlals, landscaping, architecture, site plan relationships, grading, signs, will or buffering techniques. SECTION 5: DMGM CONSTDERATIONS • A The DRC shall, in reviewing projects covered by this Ordinance, consider ouch design aspects as the relationship of building to site; the relationship of building and nits to surrounding area; landscape and site treatment; building design and materials; signs; and miscellaneous structures and street furniture The recommendations of the DRC will be based upon the project confortming to the following criteria: 1 The design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, eomaunity plan, boulevards, or planned developments 2 The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the ,se and enjuyecnt of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards I The architectural design of the proposed development to compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will malnta:n the harmonlous, orderly and attractive development contemplated by this Ordinance and the General ® Plan of the City Ordinance No 89 Page 4 • The design of the proposed development would prcvide a desirable environment for its occupants and visiting public os Well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture and color that will reruln aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance SECTION 6: PROCEDURE A. An applicant shall submit the appropriate application, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, and application fee as set by the City Council, and required materials as specified in the filing requirements set forth by the Director of Community Development, to the Planning Division on or before the filing deadline Once an application has been accepted. it rill be scheduled for the first available Design Review Committee meeting and the applicant will be notified of the time and place of such meeting All plans and applicable materials will be distributed to all members and support staff of the DRC a week prior to the scheduled meeting 8 The Jeslgn Review Committee shall meet with the applicant to review and discuss the proposed project and its conformity • with this Ordinance the DRC may formulate recommendations on the design of the project relative to the criteria listed In this Ordinance or other design criteria or development standards as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Such recommendations shall be filed in the project file to become final conditions of approval In addition, tee applicant shall receive Written notice of such recommendations C If, after review by the DRC, the Committee feels that the project needs substantial revision, the project review may be continued by the DRC to enable the applicant to rake appropriate changes and alterations The applicant shall receive written notification of such decision and the date when the DRC will meet again to review the project SECTION 1: APPEAL A Where a project appllcattim has been acted upon by the DRC, the applicant or any interested person who to aggrieved by the action, may file an appeal to the Planning Commission The appeal shall state wherein the actions of the DRC are not consistent or in conformance with the provisions of this Ordinance At a regularly * cheduled meeting, the Planning Commission may affirm, modt y or reverse the recormendut!ons of the DRC Decisions by the Panning Commission are appealable to • the City Council using the same procedures. 43 11 • E OrdI..In•.• No. R9 Page 5 SECTLO R: ENFORCEMENT A. No building permit, for the eunstructton of any building until or project described in this ordinance, may No the Design Review Cotmtttee has reviewed the project for conformance with this Ordinance, design criteria. and development standards as adopted by the City of Rancho Caeemonga B Further, prior to final inspection or occupancy. the Completed project must he ineDeeted by the Planning Division for compliance with [ha conditions of approval. No occupancy P t, shall be issued unless all elements are completed according to the approved plans. I[ for any reason this cannot be accomp lashed, a cash deposit shall be submitted by tho developer to ensure compliance. SECTION 9: EN1IRO%DTNTAI. REVIEW The Rancho Cucamc.188 City Council hap found, based on review of the Impact of Study they envireamtna aside .. i•aesla NegativeaDeclaration. adverse rojct SECTION 10: OTHER I.AWS ORDERS AND ORDINANCES Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to the properties and area% affected by this Ordinance, nor •Ball it be denied to conflict with area %tnyl In the event orders or conflict rdoestartsocc the more h morerestrictive or properties ordinance shall aPPlY SECTION 11: SEVFRABILITY oreprovisions yoff this Ordinance hall notsaffecto the pvalidity of � part any other part of the Ordinance which coa be given affect without such invalid part or parts This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a m on the list day after its adoption SFCTInN 12: The Mayor shall sign thin Ordinance and the City Clerk shall tr,st to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once In The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of onit rto, California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this __day of . 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: r / City Clerk Mayor Ordinance ha 89 Page 5 SECTION R: ENFORCEIffNT A. No building permit, for the construction of any building or project described Eh this Ordinance, may be issued until the Design Review Committee has reviewed the project for conformance with this Ordinance, design criteria, and development standards as adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Further, prior to final inspection or occupancy, the completed project must be inspected by the Planning Division for compllance with the conditions of approval. No occupancy permit shall be issued anless all elements are completed according to the approved plans If for any reason this cannot be accomplished, a cash deposit shal. be submitted by the developer to ensure compliance SECTION 9: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has found, based on revltst of the InlLlal Study, that this project will not create a significant adverse Impact of the environment and issues a Negative Declaration SECTION !0: ollru LAYS. ORDERS AND ORDINANCES Nothing in thin Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertrining or applicable to the properties and areas affected by this Ordinance, nor shall It be denied to conflict with any State lave, orders or requirements affecting such properties or areas In the event that a conflict does arise, the cure restrictive ordinance shall apply SECTION 17: SEVERABILITY The Invalidity of any word, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part or orovisions of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of any other part or the Ordinance which can be given affect without such invalid part or parts This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a.m on the 31st day after its adoption. SECTION 12: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance anc the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to uc puhll,hed within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Ra LV Report 1 nevvpaper of general cirCJlotion published In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1919 AYES: A NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk /0 s r1 LA Ll , MEMORANDUM TO: Council 8 City Manager FROM: Finance DirectC•r'.� =13JECi Bingo Ordinance In an effort to try and stem the tide of bingo, and protect 'he citizens from a possible invasion of professional bingo entrepreneurs a bingo ordinance is presented for councils approval and action. Bingo has been declared legal to California and the State does set forth the basic requirements for conducting bingo games. This ordinance re- affirms basically what the State declares are the rules for bingo and that the City Is aware also of the rules set forth and will take the necessary action to prevent Illegal games from taking place to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. HJE:cak ORDINANCE NO. 90 AN ORDIIWICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE ELIGIBILITY OF MID REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE PLAYING OF BINGO WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does or Jain as follows: SECTION 1: ORGANIZATIONS ELIGIBLE FOR CITY. LICENSE TO CONDUCT BINGO GALES (a) Bingo games may be conducted only by organizations exempted from the payment of the bank and corporation tax by Sections 23701a, 23701b, 23701d, 23701e, 23701f, 23701g, and 237011 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, and by mobllehome park associations, and senior citizens' organizations; (b) and provided that the proceeds of spich games are used only for charitable purposes, prizes and rperational costs; (c) and provided further that any orgainzation authorized to conduct bingo games comply with the provisions of this ordinance and Section 326.5 of the Penal Code. • SECTION 2: OFFINITION (a) As used in this Ordinance 'Bingo' shall mean a game of chance in which prizes are awarded on the basis of designated numbers or symbols on a card which conform to numbers or symbols selected at random. (b) Mobile home park associations shall mean those arganiinitons that are formed by the residents of mobile home parks within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (c) Senior citizen organnzations shall be those organizations formed for the benefit of senior citizens living primarily in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3 LICENSE REQUIRED No eligible organization shall conduct a bingo gamy unless It has first applied for and obtained a license from the City of Rancho Cucamonga nursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance SECTION 4 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE Any organization which is eligible under Section 1 of this ordinance may apply in writing for a license to conduct bingo games to the office 4 of licensing official The issuing authority shall be the Finance Director Ordinance No. 90 Page 2 SECTION 5 CONTENTS OF APPLICATION (a) Said application for license shall contain the following • 1 The name and address of the organization; 2 The address within the City at which the bingo games will be conducted, and the occupancy capacity of such place; 3 The leoal names, residence addresses, hone telephone numbers, drivers' license numbers, and social security numbers of the directors and officers; 4 The basis for eligibility 5 The date on which the organization was organized for the purpose stated (n the application, and the date on which the organization act vely began to pursue the purpose stated in the application; 6 The proposed days of the week and hours of the day for - conduct of bingo games; 7 The bank and account number of the account into which proceeds of the bingo game shall be deposited; 8 The name and address of the person who will be responsible • for keeping the books of the organization 9 A statement that the applicant agrees to conduct bingo games in strict accordance with the provisions of Section 326 5 of the Penal Code and this ordinance as they may be amended from time to time, and agrees that the license to conduct bingo games may be revoked by the Finance Director upon violation of any such provisions; 10. Any other information specified by the Finance Director which is reasonably required to complete the investigation on any application; it The application shall be signed by the officers of the applicant under penalty of perjury; (b) The license fee fixed by the city Council by resolution shall accompany the application (c) In addition to the foregoing information, the following documents shall be attached to the application: 1 If the organization is a corporation, certified copies of its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws if the crganizatior is other than a corporation, certified • copies of its Bylaws; Ordinance No. 90 Page 3 2. Certified copies of the "Certificate of Tax Exempt • Status" from the California Franchise Tax Board, except for =bile home parr associations or senior citizens organizations SECTION 6 INVESTIGATION The Finance Director shall examine all applications filed under Section 5 hereof and shall make, or cause to be made, such further investigation of the application and the organization as he shall deem necessary in order to perform his duties under this ordinance. Upon requdst by the Finance Director, the organization shall make available for inspection by the r ance Director, or his authorized representative for such purposes, all of the orgsniza tons books, records, and papers at any reasonable time before the license is granted, during the time a license is granted, during the time a license is in effect, or after a license has expired, or after a license has been suspended or revoked SECTION 7. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING OR DENYING LICENSES (a) The Finance Director may issue the license provided for In Section 5 hereof whenever he finds the following facts to exist 1 That all of the statements made in the application are true; • 2 That the organization is qualified under Section 1(a) of this ordinance 3 No evidence that a director, oVicer or employee of the organization has engaged in any fraudulent transaction or enterprise; a That the bingo games shall be coitrolled, supervised and conducted only by a director, of•'icer or employce of the organization; 5 That the organization has consented to inspection of the premises where the bingo games shall be conducted, and the books and bank accounts relating to the proceeds from said bingo games (b) The Finance Director may deny a license whenever he finds that any one or more of the facts in Subsection (a) of this section do not exist SECTION 8: CONTENTS OF LICENSE (a) Upon being satisfied that the applicant is fully quilified under law to conduct bingo games in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Finance Director shall issue a license to said applicant ® which shall contain the following information 4, Ordinance No 90 Page 4 The name and nature of the organization to whom the O license is issued. 2 The address where bingo games are authorized to be conducted; 3 The occupancy capacity of the room in which bingo games are to be conducted; 4 The date of the expiration of such license whtch shall be December 31st of the year it is issued; 5. Such other information as may be necessary or desirable for the enforcement of the provisions of this chapter (b) Any organiza, a holding a license hereunder shall post it in a prominent place at the location wherein it shall conduct its bingo games ic) Any license issue.l under this ordinance shall not be transferred and any attempted transfer shall void the license SECTIU11 9: PROFITS TO BE KEPT IN SEPARATE FUND OR ACCOUNT All profits derived from a bingo game shall be kept in a separate account or fund and shall not be commingled with any other fund or account The licensee shall keep full and accurate record of the income • and e,penditures received and disbursed in connection with its operation, conduct, promotion, supervision, and any other phase of bingo games which are authorized by this ordinance All profits derived from a bingo game shall be used only for the charitable purposes The City of Rancho Cucamonga, by and through iQ autho•i zed officers, shall have the right t0 exa•,ine and audit such records at any reasonable time, and the licensee shall fully cooperate with the City of Rancho Cucamonga by making such records available SECTION 10 CONDUCT OF BINGO GAMES Each organization holding a license under this ordinance shall conduct bingo games in accordance with the following requirements: (a) No minor shall he allowed to participate in any bingo games, (b) The licensee shall conduct bingo games on property as listed on the license application form; (c) All bingo games shall be open to the public, not just to the members of the licensee organization; (d) A bingo game shall be operated and staffed only by members of the licensee organization No person shall receive or pay a profit, wage or salary from ary bingo game • Ordinance No 90 Page 5 • (e) No individual, corporation, partnership or other entity except the licensee organization shall hold a financial interest in the Conduct of such bingo game; (f) No person who I, )bvl3usly intoxicated shall be allowed to participate in a bingo game, and no alcoholic beverage shall be allowed to be consumed in the room in which the bingo game is being conducted; (9) no person shall be allowed to participate in a bingo game, unless a person is physically present at the time and place at which the bingo game is being conducted; (h) the total value of prizes awarded during the conduct of any bingo gene shall not exceed $250.00 in cash or kind, or both for each separate gave which is held (i) No licensee shall conduct bingo games more than two (2) days per calendar week and more than six (6) hours out of any twenty -four hour period No bingo gare shall be conducted before 2 00 p.m. Dior after 11:59 p.m. of any day SECTION 11 ATTENDANCE LIMITED 70 OCCUPANCY CAPACITY • Notwithstanding that bingo ganes are open to the public, attendance at any bingo game shall be limited to the occupancy capacity of the r.,om in which such name 1s conducted as determined by the Fire Department and Building Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with applicable laws and regulations Licensee shalt not reserve seats or space for any person. SECTION 12. BINGO GXIES CONDUCTED ONLY ON LICENSEE'S PROPERTY A licensee shall conduct a bingo game only on the property owned or leased by it, and which property is used by such organization for any office or for performance of the purpose& for which the organization is organized The license issued under this chapter shall authorize the holder thereof to conduct bingo names only on such property, the address of which is stated in the application *.n the event the described property ceases to be used as an office or as a place for performance of the purposes for which the licensee is organized, the license shall terminate, however, the license may be obtained by an eligible organization, upon application under this ordinance, when it again owns or leases property used by it for an office or for performance of the purpose% for which the organization is organized Only one license shall be issued for any location or property SECTION 13. REPORTING REQUIREMENT% (a) Each organization holding a license under this Ordinancp shall file a written report, on d form provided by the Finance Director, ever calendar quarter 5V Ordinance ilo 90 Page 6 (b) The reports requ trod by this Section shall be filed Witt, the a Finance Director within ten (10) days of expiration of each reporting period; and such reports shall contain the names and addresses of any new directo, or r,fficer of the organization (c) Any license Issued under this Ordirance shall be suspended for any failure to comply with tfre reporting provisions of this Section; and notice thereof shall be given by registe ^ed mail to the address shown on tee organization's application (d) Any organization whose lice•,se has been suspended under this Section shall cease to conduct any bingo games until further notice from the Finance Director SECTION 14 LICENSE RENEWALS At least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of any license hereunder, the licensee organization may apply to the License Official for renewal of its license hereunder The application for renewal shall be on a form provided by the License Official, and it shall determine whether the information provided on the original application It still true (a) The Finance Director shall not renew a license if he finds that any of the facts listed in Section hereof no longer exists, or that the organ, at41n applying for renewal hereunder has failed to comply, i a j respect, with the provisions of this Ordinance SECTI04 15 RELOCATION OF LICENSES (a) Whenever it shall be shown or whenever the Finance Director has knowledge that any organization, or agent thereof, holding a license under this Ordinance has v slated any of the provisions of this Ordinance, the Finance Oirec to^ ;hall immediately suspend the license and give the organization written notice by -egistered mail of the suspension and a brief statement of the reasons therefor (b) Upon receipt of said "Notice of Suspension ", the organization whose license has been suspended shall cease from conducting any bingo game, and 'ts failure to do so shall constitute a separate and further violation of this Ordinance (c) Together with the "Notice of Suspension" required by Subsection (a) of this Section, the Finance Director shall invite the organization whose license has oeen suspended to participate in a hearing to be held within fifteen (15) days of the date of the suspension to show cause why the license should not be permanently revoked At the hearing, the organization whose license was suspended shall have the riqht to present • evidence as to the facts upon which the Finance Director based his suspension of this license, and any other fact< which may aid the Finance Director in detemining whether J El Ordinance No. 90 Page 7 this Ordinance has been violated Within fifteen (15) days after the hearing the Finance Director shall decide to reinstay. conditiorally reinstate, suspend or revoke the license Said decision together with the reasons therefor shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the organization whose license has been suspended by registered mail SECTION 16 APPEAL In the event of any finding or decisior, of the Finance Director which is adverse to the application of an organization for a license or renewal therof under this Ordinance, or if a license is suspended or revoked, the organization may appeal to the City Council, provided, that such anpeal is filed with the City Clerk withlr. fifteen (15) days fron the date of the finding or decision of the Finance Director The Finance Director shall potify an organization of this right to appeal, a,id such notice shall accompany each and every finding and decision of the Finance Director which is adverse to any organization aPDlyrnn for a license or renewal thereof under this Ordinance The finding or decision and the notice of this right to appeal shall be mailed by registered mail, to the organization at the address which appears on its application for a license or renewal thereof (a) At its first regular meeting after the filing of a notice to appeal, the City Council shall set a nearing on said appeal for a date certain within the next thirty (30) days SECTION 17 PENALTIES AND REMEDIES (a) It is a misdemeanor for any person to receive or pay a profit. wage or salary from any bingo game authorized by this Sectian. A violation of this Subsection shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000 which fine shall be deposited In the general fund of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (b) Any other violation of this Ordinance by any person, organization or entity shall constitute a misdemeanor and may be punished by a fine not to exceed $500, or imprisonment in the County Jail. not to exceed six (6) month, or both (c) The City may commence on action in a court of compet_nt jurisdiction to enjoin any violation of this Ordinance. SECTION 19: SEYERA9ILITY It is the intention of the City Council that each provision of this Ordinance shall be deemed independent of all other provisions therein, and it is further the intention of thn City Council that if any provision of this ordinance is declared invalid, all of the provisions hereof shall remain valid and enfirceable J/i^ Ordinance No. 90 Page 8 SECTION 19. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be publish --d within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dail Reg t, a newspaper of general circulation published In the Ci aT Ontarr ty California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California ATTEST. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENT City Clerk 52 Mayor 0 E J • CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA STArF REPORT DATE, November 7, 1979 70, City Council and City Manager PROM, Jack lam, Community Davelcpment Director SUBJECT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN As the City Council will recall, this item was continued from the October 3, 1979 meeting to allow staff the time to most and work with interested groups and individuals to refine the Growth management Plan. Participants m those meetings includad representatives of the Building Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce and Board of Realtors. The culmination of thaso meetings is the Growth Managemant Plan before you this evening. Two major issues were resolved at these meetings, li the perceived inequity of the Residential Assessment System to smaller developments and to infill projects and, • 2) refinement of the processing procedures to allow for two types of applications, a) Total Development applications, i.e., full review of projects including subdivi- sion and design review, and b) Custom Lot/Tract Subdivision applications, i.e., subdivision review with subsequent design quality review for dovelopments of five or more units Various minor issues were also resolved resulting in a plan staff feels is both wo.kable and equitable and which will effectuate the goals and policies of the City. Further, the Building Industry Association and the Chamber of Comorce have given their endorsement to this plan. The onn remaining issue the Council must address tonight is the astablishcant of the date of first application submittals Two alternative tri- annual review periods and corresponding submittal dates for Council's consideration arer Alternative 1 Review Period 1 - May 1 - August 31 Application filing period - May 1 - may 31 Rnview Pariod 2 - September 1 . December 31 Application filing Period - September 1 - September 30 Review Period 3 - January 1 - April 30 APDlicntion filing period - January 1 - January 31 Alternative 2 Review Porlod 1 - August 1 - November 30 Application filing period - August 1 - August 31 Review Period 2 - December 1 - March 31 Application filing period - Dec -ember 1 - December 31 w J Review period 3 - April 1 - July 31 Application filing period - April 1 - April 30 Alternative 1 is favored by the Building Industry Association while Alteraatiw 3 was previously considered by the City Council because of its tie in with the comple- tion of a number of the City's advanced planning programs. Arguments haw been brought forth for both alterrurtiws and vill likely be expressed at the meeting. Staff presents these alternative with the recommendation that the City Council consider the pros and cons of both and base their decision accordingly. It is recommended the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 86 and approve ReafectfullY submitted, 4, D1 actor o Community Development JL3BNNicc select an application suhrittal date and Resolution No. 79 -74. 546 • • n U ORDINANCE NO 86 (Revised 11/1/79) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAIT TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND PRIORITY A. Findings 1 Unmanaged residential Srowth in the City of Rancho Cucamonga can overburden elementary, junior and senior high schools ' in the comunity. 2. Unmanaged residential growth can strain public services and result in the impairment of the health, safety and i welfare of Rancho Cucamonga. 3 Haphazard and disorderly growth patterns adversely affect the City's and public agency's ability to provide adequate public services for all developments 4 Minimal architectural and site design criteria of residential development can create a "tract" appearance in the community Such an appearance detrimentally affects the physical Y character and image of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Further, lack of landscaping and design sensitivity can ' diminish the environmental quality and economic well being of the community. 5 Continued unmanaged growth can seriously impair the City's ability to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan and can adversely affect the health and welfare of the Community 8 Purpose A Growth Management Plan is designed to implement certain primary goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan These goals constitute the purpose of a Growth Management Plan and are as follows: 1 To preserve and enhance the physical character of the cormunity 2. To help ensure that adequate school facilities for all (� existing and future residential development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are provided MY 86 3 To help ensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4 To ensure that minimum design quality in new developments is provided to enhance the aesthetic, environmental, historical and economic well being of the community. 5 To encourage use of energy conservation techniques in new residential development. 6. To help maintain and improve levels of City administrative services 7. To encouragea e orderly development of residences within areas more rdily served by public services. 8. To encourage the development of master planned projects which provide the service needs of the residents of those projects 9 To encourage the provision of a variety of housing types and encourage affordable housing C Scope This ordinance shall apply to all residential development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as defined in SEction • SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: A. C_tty - City in this ordinance refers specifically to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. D Custom Lot Subdivision - A subdivision which creates parcels to so n an un eveloped state to individual owners for development of not more than four units per owner C Growth Nana emu fammittee - A committee composed of members off' —fne anmun ty veopent Department, Community Services Department, Fire District, Cucamonga County Water District, and Police Department in charge of rating Residential Development Projects per the criteria of the Residential Assessment System established by the City Council. D. Ilandata Criteria - Criteria considered essential fo^ all residential development 6`7 Ordiannce No. 86 •3- E Residential Develocrc,m rro ect - Any development which will result in the sub(, v stop o residential lots and /or the construction of rew residential dwelling units including single family, mrlti- family, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, planned cowunities, planned unit developments, modular units, condominium conversions of dwelling units which have not been built prior to the effective date of this ordinance and mobilehome parks F Residential Assessment�5 z�tea - The measuring device, provided y so ut on o e tCi y Council and adopted concurrently herewith. which is composed of a number of rating criteria used for assigning point ratings to proposed residential development projects G Threshold Point Limit - The minimum number of points a project is required to receive under the Residential Assessment System in order to receive consideration for approval H Total Develo nt - The total review of a residential development pro ect nc u ng tentative tract cup approval, unit placement, landscaping, design review, etc. I Tract Subdivision - A subdivision which creates five or more parcels to be developed as a whole by an owner or builder and which hereby shall be required to re -apply as a Total Development. Such re- application shall be required as a condition of tentative tract approval which shall be satisfied prior to approval and . recordation of the final map SECTION 3. F%ENPTIONS The following projects shall be specifically exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance A. Single family, duplex and triplex developments involving a total of four (4) units or less provided that any such application on a parcel shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a building permit for the last unit an said parcel 8 Residential land divisions involving four (4) lots or less provided that any such application on a parcel having the same zoning district shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a bRL191ngm 1 oy.�� the last unit of the project Subdivisions /?e a C tg different zoning distric s shall beeexempt from the prov zions a th ord na ce���eR,.utdutxun.,, C Liver e c z using projects D. Renewable building permits issued prior to the effective date of this ordinance Ordinance No 86 E. Condominium conversions of dwelling units built prior to the effective date of this ordinance. . F Tentative tract maps approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance. G. Site Approval or Director Review applications approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance SECTION 4: APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND FEES A. Aoplicatfon An application for a residential development project shall be made to the Community Development Department and may be in one Of two toms: (1) Total Development Package including pp tentative tract map arova , un t p acement, landscaping, design review, etc., and (2) Custom Lot /Tract Subdivision package. The following 1nr'orma on s a nc u n e Total e: elopment package and the Custom Lot /Tract Subdivision - package: I. Site Utilization Yap including a vicinity Map to show the relationship of the proposed development to adjacent development and surrounding area (small inset map) • b. Use Layout I1ap showing the lo:ation and type of Proposed residential use or uses, the nature and extent of open space, the extent of any other uses Proposed and indication of all adjacent uses 2 Detailed Site Plan to include detailed Information specified In forms provided by the Community Development Department. 3. If residential development project is submitted as a Total Development, then an Illustrative Site Plan to Include proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts and other elements as may be necessary to illustrate the site plan shall be submitted 4. if residential development project is submitted as a Total Development, then a Preliminary Architectural Plan showing typicaIs of all sides of proposed buildings and structures indicating materials to to used, trees, landscaping, and shadows to give elevations graphic dimension shall be submitted. • — J L Ordinance No. 86 -5- Conceptual grading and drainage plan and naturai features map showing a general indication of type, extent, and time of grading as per requirements of the City'- Grading Ordinance. 6. Development Schedul, of anticipated proposed project including phasing B. Fees Although no growth management review fees will be assessed any residential development project, the normal fees for subdivisions, director reviews, site approvals, appeals, extensions, etc , shall be assessed as per City Council Fee Resolution. Said fees shall be non - refundable even in the event the threshold point limit is not met. SECTION 5. MA11DA70RY CRITERIA Certain residential development criteria are considered essential to ensure General Plan consistency and adequate public service, for each residential project In the event services are not available to developers, the � .)der. building associations and other individuals and groups are Qp encouraged to work with the school districts and ot'3r special districts to solve respective problems in order that servicr, may be available for development Letters from special districts identifying ability to serve shall be issued based on non - exclusive, non - preferential criteria The Director of Community Development shall ensure that certain criteria are met prior to final approval of any res.+antial development project subject to the provisions of this ordinance Such criteria shall be Placed as conditions of approval which must be .yet prior to approval of a final map for a subdivision or prior to issuance of buildir pe %its for residential development projects other than subdivisions Say.. criteria shall be met in the following order A. Service Criteria 1 The proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan This criteria shall be met prior to eting criteria 2. El The applicant shall submit to the Community Develnpment Director written certification from all affected elementary and High School Districts that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by the proposed project. This certification shall be obtained prior to meeting criteria 3 0 Ordinance No. 86 -6- 3. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Director written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project. For projects usingrseptic facilities allowable Ll� by the Santa Ana Regional ouality Control Board and the City, written certi cation of acceptability including all supporti a information shall be obtained and submitted to the City. Appeals Any aggrieved party who perceives unjustified or inequitable demands by a service agency or agencies under the mandatory criteria may appeal in writing to the Planning Commission stating the justification for the appeal. The Planning Commission will recommend to the City Council as to the dispensation of the Appeal. Mandatory Criteria Option 0 Mandatory criteria may be met by the establishment of private service districts to provide public service capacity in lieu of existing public service districts provided that such districts • do not violate any federal, state, county or local regulation and are approved by the City Council. SECTI011 6: REVIEW AND PROCESSING PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENIiAL DEVELOPMENT A. Establishment of a Residential Assessment System. A Residential Assessment System adopted by the Council shall establish five (5) basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub - categories for rating purposes. the five basic categories are: (gg1) Public Services, (2) Design Quality, (3) Affordable (PUD)o , and ( 5) Orderly Development. Development.Planned Unit Applications for Total Development shalt be rated by the Growth Management Committee for (1) Public Services, (2) Affordable Mousingg, (3) Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments (PUD) and (4) Orderly Development, and by the Design Review Committee for Design Quality Applications for Custom Lot /Tract Subdivisions shall be rated by the Growth Management Committee for (1) Public Services, (2) Site Orientation and Street Design and (3) Orderly Development. A!ter rating, if the project meets or exceeds the Threshold Point Limit, the subdivision will proceed to the k 0 Ordinance No 86 -7- Planning Commission for review and action. For those Custom Lot Subdivisions that are proposed to be built as a whole or total project and for Tract Subdivisions that have received Planning Commission approval, re- application under Total Development, Section 1, Resolution No 79-74, shall be required as a condition of approval to be satisfied prior to approval and recordation of final map. Said reapplication may be made at any time and is not subject to the application review dates stated herein. Projects shall be evaluated under the Residential Assessment System Tri- annually by the Community Development Director. Application submittal deadline dates and review dates shall be as follows: Review Period I - p cat of n firing period - Review Period 2 - pp c71 li a— .on firing period - Review Period 3 - pP cA— TiEMo�Ting period - A Threshold Point Limit shall be established by the City • Council as part of the Residential Assessment System. This Threshold Point Limit shall constitute the minimLm number of pouts a project is required to achieve if it is to be given consideration for approval by the Planning Commission Those tentative tract applications that were previously filed under the County or San Bernardino but not approved by the San Bernardino County Planning Commission shall not proceed with processing or filing until Review Period I as stated above. Within (5) days after the point rating determination, the Community Development Director shall cause a written notice to be mailed (certified) to the applicant stating the point rating for his residential development project and whether his application has received the required Threshold Point Limit for further consideration by the Planning Commission B. Appeal of Ratings Ratings of applications by the Growth Management Committee and /or the Design Review Committee may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any aggrieved person or body, public or private, within fourteen (14) days after the day of decision. lu W Ordinance No. 86 "8- The decision of the Planning Commission of any such appeal may be appealed to the City Council by any, aggrieved party in the same manner and time limitations as are set forth for the filing of an appeal with the Planning Commission. The decision of the City Council shall be final. SECTION 7. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Planningi Commission treview eand approval oshall sber evaluated ninstejrms of environmental review and clearance, subdivision review pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, and residential development project review pursuant to the Growth Management Plan. The e la approve or he after said review. The Planning Commission hallal o earappeals of point ratings as described in Section 68 SECTION 8 BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE No building permits shall be issued for any residential dwelling unit which is subject to the prov'aions of this Ordinance without approval as provided herein. 0 SECTI011 9 : TIME LIMITS FOR APPROVAL A. Expiration of Approval The following provision shall apply to applications for Residential Development Projects except as specifically exempted by Section 3 of this ordinance Residential development projects approved after the effective date of this Ordinance shall expire after twelve (12) months from date of approval. Extension of Tentative Subdivision Approval A person who has filed a tentative subdivision may equest an extension of approval or conditional approval from the Planning Commission by written application to the Community Development Department. Such an extension request application must be filed at approval isadue to expire. days Th bapplicationpShalllcontaindatlonal descriptionfof thee progress r de towards omeeting all the statement I-1 lJ Ordinance No 86 'g" • conditions for final approval If in extension is granted, new conditions may be imposed and existing conditions may be revised by the Planning Commission. Any extension of a subdivision shall not exceed a period of eighteen (18) months SECTION 10: ANNUAL REVIEW AND EXPIRATION This Ordinance shall be reviewed annually by the City Council and Planning Commission and shall be of no further force or effect after a period of five (5) years from the date of adoption of this Ordinance, unless extended by Ordinance of the City Council SECTIO11 11. OTHER LAWS ORDERS AND ORDINANCES Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to and areas affected by this Ordinance, nor shall it be deemed to conflict with State laws, event orders or conflictrdoestarise ,�thegmorehretr or restrictive ordinance shall apply SECTION 12: SEVERABILi TY The invalidity of any work, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part or par[ rofi this sOrdinarce0 which ncan sbel validity given affect without Such invalid part or parts This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect at 12:01 a m. on the 31st day after its adoption SECTION 13: The Hayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk z a attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the saee to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The D_ailY _R�e�rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the Ley of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979- AYES: NOES: ABSENT: yor ® ATTEST: RESOLUTION 110. 79 -74 (Revised 11/1/79) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAI:LHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS- , NENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY 11 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City at Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Ordinance No. 86 entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamo..ga, California, establishing a Growth Fir�a4a ent Plan to Regulate New Residential Development in the rat; of Rancho Cucamonga ", which requires that a Residential Ass:,,ment System for devplopment review be established, setting forth five (5) basic categories, each category being assigned a maximum number of total points which shall he used for rating purposes; and WI:rREAS, the Planning Commission of the City has recommended adoption of a Growth Ma +agement Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the :ity Council has corsidered the purposes of tie Gromwth Management Plan as set ford in paragraph B of Section 1 of said Ordinance and the criteria reel0red to be considered in paragraph A, Section 6 of said Ordinance inc'uding, but not limited to, Public Services, Design Quality, Affordaole Housing, Planred Communities and Plannrd Unit Developments, and Orderly Development NOW, THEREFOR=E, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a Residential Assessment iystem is established based upon the following criteria for Total Development: SECTION 1: PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities The Growth lfanageme,mt Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately 4'spuse of surface runoff A project must receive a minir+m u' : points in this category in order to receive further conside ation (10 pts maximum) Project drains into an existing or panned storm drain or street capFable of h ndling the surface water generated 8 point Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits Of site which is aise capable of handling the surface au ter generated oy the project (2 points) Resolutio i No. 79 -74 Page 2 3. Project provides special drainage facilities 'e.g.. on- site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (1 point) (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.0 0.'s.phased master planned developments,etc , Drainage Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project) Street Circulation and Improvements The Growth Management Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project A pr, Jett mist receive a minimum of 5 Points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). 1 Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway _ or 1s located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (5 points) 2 Traffic generated by the proposed project will not subst_n.ialty alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existirg • street system (5 points) 1 Project provides street iml.- ovomeits beyond project limits for traffic continuity a.,d safety (3 points) 4 Project will build r widen a collector street or I- located adjacent to a fully improved collector street (4 points) S. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by City standards (2 Points) ([NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Coamun ties, P U O.'s, phased mister planned developments, etc , Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the Point total shall be applied to each phase of that project) C. Residential Safety and Securlt The Rrowth Management Committee shall review each project for it: ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County SNeriffs 0erartment and the Fonthili Fire nistrict and the extent to which the project incorporates safe., and security techniques A project must receive a minimum of 3 points in each of the following categories in order to receive further • consideration (8 points maximum) Resolution No 79 -74 Page 3 Polices Protection (4 points maximum) of existing eot a. Project e within 5 ol r oposeddevelopmentthat has received Direct rlonnover Otiofiitsoperimetert(2 points) nt existing eo ajt e within receiedappr Project Director the rlbetwee Commission and 70'. of itsnperimetero(1 Development point). C. Solid core exterior doors. security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points) d. Se uritY devices i psuch as window locks will be in e. Use. site planning and architectural tecniques such as del: ,,sible space design, lighting placement etc., to enhance residential security 0 point) (NOTES: 1 For project submitted as12n^nnedeveotl Pnities. p U. D.Is. phased master p • etc.. Police Protection shall beeevaluated for te the entire project and the p° t l applied to each phase of that project). t 2 Portions that are ad atent t ro rrt held u c a enc es nc u n ut not m ted to ro ette ar :5. ro ette SC oo sites the lot ona oresr food contra recent on as ns, etc. s a not be counted aoa nst or towar3 t o re au rements o a s 3. if the a licante oco� °r- atentasccondit ons of e t ese w . t mao fprova o t e 2. Fire Protection (4 points maxima+^ is h re minute a drivingorespo the e time ct afirestation(4points). of en a b minute driving response time of a fireestationv(2 ind points) c minute Odriving project response eeofaaffireastationn(1 A point). Resolution 79 -74 Page 4 d Fire mitigation measures (e.g . fire resistent building materials, site design which enhances fire • access, etc.) are inco•,orated into the design of the pro ject (2 points). (NOTE: If the applicant opts for point 2(d).it will be nco orated as cond tons o� a roves the - tentative tract ma 0. Parks and Paths The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and /or private parks and usable open space. A project must receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 pbints maximum) 1 Project provides on or off site public park improve.�nts and /or school recreational facilities (1 point) 2 Project provides p,.vately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point). 3 Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and /or private park sites with low mair anance • foot pathways wherever possible (1 point). 4 Project provides trails or bikeways (. point) S. Over 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of an existino Publ'c park site (4 points) 6 Over 50% of project is located within 1 / 2 mile -adlus of a future proposed public park site (1 point) 7 Over 505 of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of an existing public park site U points) 8. Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of a future proposed public park site (1/2 point) 9 More than 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of usable public open space other than public parks (e.g , school facilities, national forest, etc ) (2 points) (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Cammnities. P.U.O.'s.phased master planned deveiupments, etc., provision of parks shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of Viet project ) 0 Resolution Mo 79 -74 Page 5 E Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center • The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its iocatiOn to existing and future neighborhood commercial shopping certers For the purposes of this section a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20.000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points ¢aximm) 1 More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points) 2 More than 50% of project is withir. 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) 3. Morc than 50: of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 Points) 4 More than 50% of project is between ? and 3 miles of a Planned future neighborhood commercial snapping center (1 point) 5 Project is more than 3 miles from an exis•ing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) F Project Maintenance • The protect provides for a Homeowner s Association and /or Maintenance District tg ensure both on and Of site main- tenance (3 points) L`J (NOTE If the City determines that there are no public right -of -ways within or adjacent to the project that normally requt -e city maintenance. the project will receive the maximum points in this category) SECTION 2. SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN The Growth Management Committee shall review site or ,mtatlon Of eaph project to determine variability of lot siz "a and configurations to a,commma4te terrain and street design. and 11su. variability of tot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations If this category dogs not apply to a Residential Development Project. then such project will receive the maximum number of points (up to 10 Points maximum) Criteria The following :riteria represent the nereral types of Site Orientation ana Street Design elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider in their evaluation Pro -ects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still Le eligible for the maximum number of points i Resolution ho. 79 -74 Page 6 A. Site orientation 1. linimizes crowding and enhances spacial relationships (e.g. • by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots). 2. Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing layout. 4 3. Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites. 4 Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and veget,tion. 5 Designs lots and structures to minioize noise through the use of setbacks, proper locatior. o' air conditioning units, living areas and the like. 6. Creates visual relief along resident'..' streets (e.g , varying buildingg setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc ) a Street Design 1 The design of streets and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while caintaining accenable fire response time • a Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvil hear street design and /or other design techniques b. Avoids short blocks, dead end and halo streets (as opposed to cut -de -sacs) whenever possible C. Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d. marking access is from local streets rather than secondary or major streets 2. Public transportation is encouraged by the project. a. Locates bus stops as part of the development wherever - ecessary as a result of planned or current bus routes b. Provides bus pullout areas and covered waiting areas for user wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus rout - 3 Varies sidewalk dimensions and patterns to avoid monotony 4 Provides handicapped access to the project • ».era... .,,. Resolution Ito 79 -74 Page 7 . SECTION 7. ORDERLY NT The Growth iianagenent Committee shall review all projects for thr extent to which they accomplish the orderly development continuous extension of existing development rather than 'leap -frog Two - thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that pment is within 500' of existing development or mmi within proposed which has been approved by the Planning Commission or ropertyhheldyby Development Director Portions that aru adjacerotected parks. projected school agenciesincluding' Forest flood control retention basins, etc shall not be counted against or toward the requirements SECTION a. DESIGN QUALITY A. Architects appointed members The Design Review Committee a(c the tirectorto Comm unity Development Of Of the Planning Commission etc for architectural or his designate). shall review each P j design quality as indicated by the Quality of uildinucti ley th¢ architectural elevations of the Prcposed buildings Judged terms of architectural st,le. size and height A project must receive a minimum f 8 opo1int itn tIII category in order to receive further cons deration ('lU W ^ s max mum . • Criteria Design fo lowementsriteriarepresents the geteea shalleconsiderh inec Loral their evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentiod pointsne Ith is notdthe intent of the %na number ge°Cnt Plan tof dictate a particular architecture nor to encourage certain priced ofteri:l Growth ManagementePlanc toefosterocreative design tsolutions intent and to discourage discriminatory review of higher cost versus lower cost projects 1 Provides various visual and tactile textures by using an assortment of building materials to finish surface 2 Creates variety in design and architecture that creates strong identity a Project provides a mix of differing one story dwellings and /or a mix of one and two story dwellings to achieve a variety of housing mix and to reduce the sameness of the project b torcrea eediversity byetdnot creatingsexcessive cont asts. ?1 I - 1 Resolution No 79 -74 Page 8 c. Varies the color and design of housing units is with particular attention to common thanes without creating excessive contrasts d Provides special design features such as curvilinear walks, textured walkways, etc 8 Landscape and Screening Design The Design Review Comrmittee shall review each project for Landscape and Screening Design Such review will determine compatibility of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, walls and fences, mounding, paths, lighting, etc., with the topography and site characteristics of the project A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further copsideration (10 points maximum). Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Landscape and Screening Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of pe.nts Each criteria ray or vy not apply to both single family dwellings and multi - fa -ily dwellings if such criteria is not applicable, and no • landscaping is required by the city, then the project will be eligible for the maximum number of points in this category 1 Landscaping materials are utilized to provide home privacy and also screen trash and stora;e areas 2 Landscaping techniques and building materials are used to enhance the quality of the site and architecture 3 Project provides lnter16r parkway landscape and irrigation improvements. 4 Planting materials blend with and enhance the architectural design of the development 5 Fences, hedges, walls, etc., are compatible with and enhance the architectural design of the development 6 Trees are used for screening adjacent streets and enhancing site quality 7 Stabilization of slopes is promoted by landscaping techniques which prevent slope erosion. 8. Lighting sources are screened to minimize light spill over from one house to its neighbor r6A Resolution No 79 -74 Page 9 • 9 Drought resistent plants are utilized. 10. Earthen berms are placed to delineate the use of spaces, provide privacy, reduce noise, control wind, mitigate flooding, frame views, etc 11 Grouped parking areas are landscaped Lo provide shading and visual screening from sheets and buildings 12 Apartment /condom nium and condominium conversion tree planting meets or exceeds the City standard of 50 trees /gross acre. C Energy Conservation The Growth Management Committee shall review each project submitted for provisions of passive and active energy conservation techniques used to terms of architectural design, landscaping, and site orientation (5 points maximum, partial points may be achieved) 1 Building orientation and landscaping are designed to maximize the use of passive solar heating in winter months and cooling wr.rds in summer months • a Buildings are situated to maximize passive solar heating in winter months (e g , east -west aligned units, south facing windows, etc ) (1 point) b windows are placed to allow coolln8 from prevailing mm westerly suer breezes (1/2 potn t) c Tree planting considers any effects on the use or future installation of residential solar energy collectors (1/2 point) 2 Units are pre - plumbed for adapt,on to solar energy heaters (2 points) 3 Energy conserving building materials and appliances are incorporated into the architectural design, (e.g , reduced consumption shower heads, Letter grade insulation, double pane windows, etc ) (1 point) 4 Development provides option to tomebuyers to Purchase solar energy collectors for heating purposes (2 points) SECTION 5 AFFOP,DCBLE HOUSING The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the ® provision of adequate housing for all segnxnts of the population In 2--? Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 10 order to create diversified neighborhood environments and income groups, • avoiding concentrations of any single income group in one particular neighborhood Those residential development projects which provide 'affordable' housing snall be given additional point consideration as well as opportunities for density bonuses. For purposes of this section, Affordable Housing is defined as Cwner Occupied: Projects which are sponsored through government programs or privately financed through market rate programs having a price range of 3.5 times 80 -1205 of the current median family income of San Bernardino County consistent with the City's Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) This intone figure shall be readjusted annually and is currently $14,800 > Renter Occu ted. Fair market rent in San Bernardino County as defined F ect on o the Housing and Community Development Act which shall be ' readjusted periodically and is currently:" of Bedrooms Detached Sent- detached /Row Walkup Elev (2 -4 stories) 0 - 262 280 i 1 - 348 316 336 2 460 425 377 399 • 3 512 471 409 - 4 568 535 454 - The above figures include the price of utilities and may be increased by not more than 10% if allowable by the provisions of the Housinq and Community Development Act For projects which do not include utilities in the rental rates, the following deductions from the above described fair market rates shall be made of Bedrooms Deductions for Utilities 0 25 1 30 2 35 3 40 4 45 •Hedian family income of San Bernardino County is current as of lanuary, 1979 **Fair market rent is current as of April, 1979. • i lJ O DI Resolution Page 12 8. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) which are not a part of an adopted Planned Community shall receive 1 point for each 5 acres of planned unit development not to exceed a total of 3 points for the entire project SECTION 7: CUSTOM LOT /TRACT SUBDIVISIONS This section will evaluate those factors applicable to Custon Lot /Tract Subdivisions and derive a point rating which would apply to any future residential development project of five units or more. For approved Custom Lot Subdivisions that are later proposed to be built as a whole or total project.of five or more units and for Tract Subdivisions that have received Planning Commission approval, re- application shall be required under Total Development, Section 1, of this Resolution to receive further ratings in the Design Quality. Affordable Housing, and Planned Communities and P.0 D.'s sections as a condition of approval prior to the approval and recordation of the Final Map. If the subdivision requires substantial changes in the originally approved map, then a re- review shall be required under Sections 1,2. 8 3 of this resolution Applications for Custom Lot/Tract Subdivision shall be rated using the following criteria: A. Public Services Drainage Facilit'es The Growth Management Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff. A project must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration 110 points maximum) Project drains Into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated (8 points) b. Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental ,.apacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which are capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points). Resolution Mo. 79 -74 Page 11 Criteria 1 Affordable housing shall be evaluated using the following criteria: a. Project provides 15% or more affordable housing (6 points, up to 20% density bonus). b. Project provides 5 to 15% affordable housing (4 points, up to 10% density bonus). c Project provides 1 to 5% affordable housing (2 points, up to 5% density bonus). (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Affordable Housing shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project This section may not be implemented until the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance have been amended to allow for density bonuses) SECTION 6: PLANNED COMMIMITIES AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (P.U.D.) A. Planned Communities the Growth Management Committee shall review each project submitted as a Planned Commmity for the degree to which it achieves a variety of housing types, provides public facilities and services, efficient internal circulation and overall integration of residential design factors For purposes of this ordinance, an application submitted as a Planned Cw:munity must consist of a minimum of 300 acres (up to 3 points maximum) Criteria The follo -q - iteria represent the qeneral types of elements the Growt a ement Committee shall consider when evaluating Planned Co. ities Such developments may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points 1 Provides for a variety of housing types and costs to complement existing housing in the immediate area, 1 e Amer Occo l: single family, multi- family townhouses, co r- n ums edRental: Apartments, duplexes and elderly family 2 Provides for necessary public facilities, a g., sewer and water lines, fire facilities, school facilities, etc , to serve the residents of the development 3 Provides an efficient internal circulation system designed to maximize safety and minimize congestion and monotony, which 1s integrated with the City's Master Street Plan • 4 Creates various and diverse architectural and site design themes throughout the development, however, not over exagerating any one theme. FA Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 13 • C. Project provides special drainage facili• es (e.g , on -site storm drains. underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to allc•vlate grading constraints (1 point) NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Comunitiesll1P U 0.'s, phased master planned development, etc., Drai/�age Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project) 2. Street Circulation and Improvements The Growth Itanagement Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and by Its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project. A project must receive a minirpm of 5 ooints in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). a. Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (5 points) b Traffic generated by the proposed project will not . substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points) C. Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points) d. Project will build or widen a collector street or is located adjacent to a fully improved collector street (2 points). e. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by the City Standards (2 points). (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P U.O.'s, phased master planned developments, etc , Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project). I Residential Safety and Security The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Dena ^dino County Sheriffs Department and the Foothill © Fire District and the extent to which the project 72 Page 14 I ncorporates safety and security techniques. A project oust receive a minimum of 3 points in each of the following categories ir, order to receive further consideration • (8 points maximum) Police Protection (4 points maximum) 1 Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Cemtmission or Community Development Director on over 70% of its perimeter (2 points). 2. Project site 1s within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Coamission or Co munity Development Director between 250 and 70% of its perimeter (1 point) 3 Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points). 4 Security devices such as window locks will b2 installed in each unit (1 point) 5. Uses site planning am' architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting placement, etc , to enhance residential security 0 point) 0 (NOTES: 1 For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P U.D.'s, phased .master planned developments, etc , Police Protection shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project 2 Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the flational Forest, flood control retention basins, etc , shall not be counted against or toward the requirements of a(1) and a(2). 3. If the applicant opts for points a(3), a(4), and a(5) these will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map) b. Fire Protection (4 points maximum) 70: - 87; of the project is within a three minute driving response time cf a fire station (4 points). 2. 70% - 80: of project is between 3 three and five minute driving response time of a fire " station (2 pints). Resolution No 79 -74 Page 15 • 3. 70: - 80% of project is between a flue and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (1 point). 4. Fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistent bulluing materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc ) are incorporated into the design of the project (2 points). (NOTE: if the applicant opts for point 4, it will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map) 4. Parks and Paths The Growth Naiagement Cormittee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and /or private parks and usable open space A project must receive a minimum of 2 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maxir.um) a. Project provides on or off site public park improvements • and /or school recreational facilities (1 point) b Project provides privately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities tl point) C. Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and /or private park sites with low maintenance fo.t pathways wherever possible (1 point) d. Project provides trails cr bikeways (1 point). e. Over 50: of project is located within a 112 mile radius of an existing public park site (4 points) f. Over 50: of project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park site (1 point) g Over 50: of project is located between 1,2 and 1 mile radii of an existing public park site (2 po!ntal h. Over 50: of project is located between 1/2 r .d 1 mile radii of a future proposed public prrk site (112 point) A I. liore than a0t of project is located within a 112 r0 mile radius of usable public open space other than oubiic parks (e.g , school facilities, National Forest, etc.) (2 points) Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 16 (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Comnunitmes, • P U Ms. phased master planned developments, etc.. Parks and Paths shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point totdl shall be applied to each phase of that project) Neighborhood Commercial_ Shopping Center The Growth Hanagement Committee shall review each project for Its location to existing and future neighbor- hood commercial shopping centers For the purpose of .ats section, a "neighborhood commercial shooping center" shalt mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,OOC square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum). a More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of an existing neignborhnod commercial shopping center (3 paints) b More than 50: of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points). C More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) d More than 502 of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). e Project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point). 6. Project Maintenance The project provides for a Homeowner's Association and /or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site maintenance (3 points). (ROTE �lght the of- ways determines orthat djacent for the project that normally req.ire city maintenance, the project will receive the maximum Pcints in this category) Site Orientation and Street Design The Growth Management Committee shall review site orientation of each praject to determine variability of lot sizes and configuration* < v Resolution Ito 79 -74 Page 17 to accommodate terrxip and street design, and also, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house de51an9 anE erientitions if this category does not aV?ly to a ReS ldenttal DeveloVwnt Pro.lect %n2n such projCCt 1+971 receive the ma x mum number o po nts i'up {.o 10 Points maxinnan7 Criteria The following criteria representsthe general types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Growth lianagement Cormittee shall consider in their evaluation Project may Include other criteria not specitically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points Site Mentation I Minimizes crowding and enham.ces spatial relationships (e.g , by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots) 2 Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper tot and housing layout 3 minimizes sharp enaled lots constituting poor building ,ties 4 Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetatlon. 5 Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks, proper location of air conditioning units, living areas and the like 6 Creates visual relief along residential streets (e.g , varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc ). ' -,eet Design The design of street and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation dnd fire access 011e maintaining acceptable fire response t'mc a Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvi- linear street design and other design techniques b Avoids short blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul -de -sacs) whenever possible C. Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d Parking access is from local streets rather than secondary or major streets 15l Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 18 C. Orderly Development • The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than "leapfrog development' Two - thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that is within 500' of existing development of within 500' of proposed development which has been appruved by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies Including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements (6 points maximm) SECTION 8: THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT Tie City Council hereby sets a Threshold Point Limit of 68 points for Total Development and 43 points for Custom Lot /Tract Subdivisions NON. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts Resolution No. 79 -74 establishing the Residential Assessment System. • ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT, City Clerk Yor • Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 19 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT RATIIIG - SUMMARY • CATEGORY MAX. POINTS I PUBLIC SERVICES PERCENTAGE �3 A Drainage Facilities 10 (8 Pts min) 11.1% 8 Street Circulation and lmprdvwents 10 (5 pts min) 11 1% C Residential Security 4 (3 pts min) 4.4% I Police Protection 4 (3 ppttps min) 4 4% 2. Fire Protection D. Parks and Paths 6 (2D�CSL min) f 6 7% E Commercial Shopping Centers 3 3.3% F Project Maintenance 3 3.3% 40 44 4% it. DESIGN QUALITY A Architectural Design 10 11 1% B Site Orientation and Street Design 10 11 1% C Landscape and Screening Design 10 11 1S 0 Energy ConservatioA 5 ' 5.6% 35 38.9% III AFFORDACLE HOUSING 6 6 7% IV. PLAIINED C01IMNITIES 8 PU"s /rid 1 Planned Communities or 2. PUD's 3 3 3% V ORDERLi DEVELOPEVIENT 6 6.7% TOTAL 90 Points 99 9% THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT 66 Points �® (NOTE Percentages my not add up to 100 due to rounding) �3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 07, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance District No 1 At its October 17, 197v meeting she City Council gave preliminary approval of the Engineers Report and passed the Resolution of intention to form Landscape >Ialntenance District Number 1, That Council Meeting Resolution established November u7, 1979 as the date and time for receiving public hearing of protest to the formation. To agenda time no opposition to the District formation had been received. RECOVENDATION: • After receiving public Input on this item, it the Council still visiles to form this District It to recommended that you pass the attached Resolution ordering the District Formation. C Respectfully Submitted, C / V Hu Lloyd ubbs City Engineer LBI1: cd E F� RESOLUTION dO 79 -89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCA1 NGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH FOWIATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NUMBER 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 7th day of November, 1979, adopt its Resolution of Intention No 79 -81 to order the therein described work in connection with Landscape Ha'stenance District lb 1, which Resolution of Intention No 79 -81 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by taw, shown by the affidvvit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file In the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement`, was duly and legally posted In the time, fom, manner, location, and number as seauired by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; ano WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention lic 79 -31, according to the ^awes and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailira or as known t0 the City Clerk of the City of Cucamonga, which said joles were duly ailed in the time, torm, and manner as required by law, rs appears fror the Affidavit o' Hailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, %aid C'•y Council hazing duly received considered evidence oral any documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necec%ity for the cortemolated wor• and the benefit; to to derived therefrom and said City Council having now acqui-ed ja-isdictiyn to order the proposed work; SECTi Oh I It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City oi%-ncFo Cucamonga that the public interest and Convenience requiros the anreaatica to the district and the ordering of work, and said Citv CGunci, hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described Ir said Resolution of intention nr 79 -81, be done and made; and S :CTION 6 Be it further resolved that tie report filed by the Enginee- ♦s nereby finally approved, and SECIION 3 Be it Ct „e'I- resn•ved that the assessments frr fiscal year- T§r9, and methoti of assessment in the Engineer's Report art hereby appr -v,, ® PASSLO, APPpOYED end AOCPTFD this day of , 1979 ATTEST -- City Clerk �� r C S7 MEMORANDUM 0 Data November 1, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Camaanity Services Subject: City Council Meeting of November 21, Requested Location Change Staff requests that Council consider locating and holding their regular meeting of November 21, at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow. This request is based on the following: A hearing will be held on thi- date to discuss before Council the renaming of streets in the North Town area The "street naming." however, is not the key issue here. In my opinion, the key issue is that many of the residents contacted on this issue said 00h well, the City will do what THEY want to do anyway, so why say anything In a meeting attended by Lloyd Hubbs and myself It seened clear that "THE CITY" is some remote thing to many people. By holding the meeting at the Neighborhood Center, it will hopefully demonstrate that the City is not remote and will "go . the extra mile" to get its people involved in decisions that affect them. Digressing for a moment, i would recommend that on a quarterly basis Council I+eetings be scheduled "out" in the community. For example, Ettwanma Intermediate School first and third quarters and the Neighborhood Center second and fourth quarters This type of approach, while somewhat "irregular" to traditional city government, could be nothing but a strong plus in our favor. Request that the location for the regular Council Meeting of November 21, be scheduled for the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrow, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCNIO COCA)10= ML40RANDUM Date: November 7, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lm, Director of Community Development Subject: ADJUSTMENT IN SB 01 FEES FOR CCCIRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Attached, please find a letter from Superintendent Cuith of the Central School District requesting an adjustment in the SB 201 fees. The Superin- tendent requests so additional $256,105 to the original $200,000 requested in February of this year. The total amount of dollars necessary to house the students generated by the 238 units to be constructed in the Central School District would be $456,105. With 103 units already constructed, $93,000 has been generated leaving $123,000 of the original $216,000. Add the new request of $256,000 to the remaining $123,0M comes to a total of $379,000 With an 82 inflation factor, the amunt used for computation is $409,320. The formula is as follow: (number of dwelling unite) R (wet per dwelling unit) - total number of dollars needed. (135 d.0 ) R $3,032/d.u. • $409,320 Therefore, in order to provide tha necessary dollars to meet the need for Central School District, the fees ttey must receive is $3 032 /dvellizig unit; that 1s an increase of $2M124 from tho current $908 /dwelling unit. Of the 238 dwelling ,mite, 103 have been constructed, leaving 135 welling units. Specifically Tracts 9193, 9262, 9423 and 9589. Staff has r t with Superintendent Cuith and Ken Willis of the BIA to work out a solution to the Central School District's need. As of the uniting of this memormodum, no addi- tional information to available. Superintendent Cuith will be present on November 7th to make a presentation. geapdct[ulty sub J L---j JACR Oiree twr of Comunity Development JL:BRH:nm W October S, 1979 Mr. Born- Roger, Senior City Planner City of Rancho Cucamnga P. 0 Bix 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. slogans 13GCEINEO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMAUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. UCT 0 5 1919 AM PM Y18)9a018)12)11213141S16 Al The Central School District has experienced unanticipated growth due to the elimination of double sessions, projected enrollment for September, 1979, was slightly under 2,500. As of October 1, 1979, enrollment in 2,612 with now enrollees at each school site daily The Homestead Homes tract and the Marlboro tract will be ready for occupancy during October, 1979, Further, the remaining 134 tentatively approved homes yet to be built during this school year will create an additional housing problem for the school district This increase • in enrollment necessitates a thorough roovaluation of evelopers' fees Obviously, the $904 per dwelling unit in inadequate to meet the needs of the school district Based upon a loading factor of 56, we anticipate an increase of 164 additional students during the school year At the present time, the Central School Dirtrict has authorized the lease of three double -vide trailers as classroom space and three single -wide (10' x 27•) trailers for learning handicapped classes These are being leased using the Genoral Fund which will have a deleterious effect on the instructional program In the Central School District The anticipated 164 students w!ll result in the need for an additional six classrooms during the current school year The Central School District is exploring all awnuos for providing additional classroom space including: 1 $13 million dollars available through AB 8 for t!sporary classroom space. 2 Special legislation, SB 956, which would authorize the Central Elementary School District to issue bonds authorized by the voters of that district in a, election h41d March 8, 1977 This, however, would require an ad- visory were by the voters, which is not possible prior to April, 1980. 3 An increase in SB 201 funds through resolution by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. Use of General Fund monies. ® S. Special legislation. CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOti•t MERCED SCHOOL VALLE VISTA SCHOOL 7933 Archlxld Ara- 7621 Hallman Ara. 10333 Palo Alto St. 7777 Vail, Vute Drive Td. 714-TV -2341 W 7149E7.1718 Tat 714.980.1600 Tel. 714.981.3697 90 Of Tnarm CENTRAL d � � Ea* A To eur, leek mr SCHOOL • ,Hl�i / ' n". 9 sh..7rn2 Pa.,[* a �`�'Dai g`n"e Iainde 1 W,phH, AlrnM ' DISTRICT t •' CEEROREN `�. ALLOKD Nermen G Cud*, Ed D „Sapraattndrar fe ! Jahn A Mrtte,r.amuuee Sx ftw'.iear 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770 Tel. 714.989.8341 October S, 1979 Mr. Born- Roger, Senior City Planner City of Rancho Cucamnga P. 0 Bix 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. slogans 13GCEINEO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMAUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. UCT 0 5 1919 AM PM Y18)9a018)12)11213141S16 Al The Central School District has experienced unanticipated growth due to the elimination of double sessions, projected enrollment for September, 1979, was slightly under 2,500. As of October 1, 1979, enrollment in 2,612 with now enrollees at each school site daily The Homestead Homes tract and the Marlboro tract will be ready for occupancy during October, 1979, Further, the remaining 134 tentatively approved homes yet to be built during this school year will create an additional housing problem for the school district This increase • in enrollment necessitates a thorough roovaluation of evelopers' fees Obviously, the $904 per dwelling unit in inadequate to meet the needs of the school district Based upon a loading factor of 56, we anticipate an increase of 164 additional students during the school year At the present time, the Central School Dirtrict has authorized the lease of three double -vide trailers as classroom space and three single -wide (10' x 27•) trailers for learning handicapped classes These are being leased using the Genoral Fund which will have a deleterious effect on the instructional program In the Central School District The anticipated 164 students w!ll result in the need for an additional six classrooms during the current school year The Central School District is exploring all awnuos for providing additional classroom space including: 1 $13 million dollars available through AB 8 for t!sporary classroom space. 2 Special legislation, SB 956, which would authorize the Central Elementary School District to issue bonds authorized by the voters of that district in a, election h41d March 8, 1977 This, however, would require an ad- visory were by the voters, which is not possible prior to April, 1980. 3 An increase in SB 201 funds through resolution by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 4. Use of General Fund monies. ® S. Special legislation. CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOti•t MERCED SCHOOL VALLE VISTA SCHOOL 7933 Archlxld Ara- 7621 Hallman Ara. 10333 Palo Alto St. 7777 Vail, Vute Drive Td. 714-TV -2341 W 7149E7.1718 Tat 714.980.1600 Tel. 714.981.3697 Hr Barry Nogw, October 5, 1919 Pago 2 The avenues available for immediate classroom spat• are few and include, • 1 Installetfon of portable classrooms Experience in building the Donn Hotted School indicates that approximately ten months cro required from conception of the Idea to completion of the project. 2 Irstallation of modular classroom space Speclficaliy, the installation of double -wide trailers which would cost considerably less than the more Permanent portable classroom units The present mat of portable classroom units, as outlined in fl above. is approxi- mately $45,000 plus installation Our estimates for the installation of six port- able classroom units installed would be approximately $771,000 SncludLng six class- room units of $45.000 each, installation fee of S80,000, and 6s architectual fees of $21,000, for a grand total of $771,000 The lease of six additional double -rido mobile units as outlined in !2 above at approximately $600 per month would be $47,200 par year plus one -time installation fees of approximately $48,400 The former estimate for portable classrooms of $171,0. d would provide well con- structed portable classroom units which should last many years. However, it Should be noted that the Dona Merced permanent school will be out to bid by November, 1979, and is expected to be completed by September, 1981 This should alleviate the neces- sity for the six additional portable classroom units until such time ae addLtional • construction creates further Overcrowding conditions Thus. the desirability for No higher cost portables is diminished. In essence, I m requesting additional developers' fees to be utilized as follows, 1. Two -year lease of three 10' x 27' modular units $ 10,080 1 Tiro -year lease of three double-wide modular units 47,200 7. Two-year lease of six additional double -wide modular units 86,4C0 4 Installation of nine double -wide modular units 78,400 5 Installation of three 10' s 27' modular units 5,000 6 Furniture and equipment 20,810 7 Five percent contingency 12,195 Total 5256,105 Please ncto that this request is in addition to the $904 per dwelling unit and pre - suppose, no additital construction within the Central School District Your immediate consideration of this matter would be slncornly appreciated If I may be of assistance in answering questions, please do not hesitate to call me I m anticipating this issue will be diocunsod at the City Council meating on Wednesday evening, October 17 Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, // /1 � �r(/f�� • VOr1a&n C Guith, Ed D., Superintendext�,. NCO, vs �`V(/ BEFORE THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE ` d l V F. 1) CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT •QF X11 0 CUCA610NGA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORtI A Y NUHM DEVEt,TpW[NT DEPT. OCT 101979 FY RESOLUTION #--4 (79 411) P °: SB tot 7IS19 jig d11u111213141516 'WHEREAS, the Central School District has experienced unusual Wj ;EAS, all classrooms. multipurpose rooms and libraries are presently utilized as classrooms. and. WHEREAS, all grade level enrollments are above 33 students per grade level average, and. WHEREAS. approximately xima tely164schooliyear tudents are expected to the Roovercarowdingrconditionse l inc udingbbondusales. General alleviate Fund expenditures. and use of Developers' Fees, and, WHEREAS, the need for nine (9) additional classrooms and fur nis ng exists. now THEREFORE,LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the Central School District Board initiate at study urge f SB 201tFunding nlevelsca Cucamonga Central said levels to temporary classroom space for The foregoing RESOLUTION was passed and adopted at a regular onethe 9 A the daY DfrOCt Trustees 97 by the Central vote. School District On ;lotion of Dale E. Taylor Seconded by Pamela Mri9ht Ayes: 5 Noes 0 Absent: 0 ® 1979 Dated this 10th Day of October itMt, 0 u ,3 ecr Lary o the overn ng oar r Bin baldy view chapter to 16N ndusuy assocnatm of scx then cdkff%& nc October 19, 1979 tir Lauren Wasserman, City tanager Rancho Cucamonga City Hall P 0 Bea 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Dear Lauren: Regarding a propossed $1,000.00 per unit fee increase for the Central School District, we would like to make the following points: 1) It has been our impression that school fees would be annually reviewed, not semi- monthly. 2) We understand that the enrollment increase is due to • children returing from private schools, not new development. The BIA opposes the proposition that our developers should pay for classroom space for children here prior to their developing. 3). CBIA supported SO 956 which now allows the Central School District to sell some $600,000.00 in bonds not previously possible for t%em. (A copy is enclosed). It should be noted that we are "voluntarily" passing our fees to the schools directly We will do this so long as everyone plays by the agreed upon ground rules, i e., plays fair When the rules change, we will insist that the city take our fees and pass it along to the schools. Thus binding them to the confines of SO 201 temporary provisions, denying letters allowing permanent use of funds and threating a "refund" of all funds paid should Winberry vs. Shasta go against Shasta County The developers are cooperating at tits time It is impartive that the schools keep their agreement. ,Sincerely, �Eaecu veeDirector View Chapter, BIA 1150 N Haman Ave Stdg A Ste 207 //�� llyan4 CA 91786 (714) 9814997 (5 sn Atwun 0194 NAKS W ms MA a N E M 0 R A N D U N DATE: October 25, 1979 TO: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager FROM: Jim Robinson Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: School Fees /Central School District On Wednesday of this week I talked with Ken Willis of the B.I.A. regarding the Central School District's proposed school fee increase from $904 to $2,000. From my conve.s..tion with Ken, he made it quite clear that tin B.I.A. is not willing to budge an inch in this issue. The Building industry is not willing to go to $905 or $906. Apparently a large number of 'unanticipated" students have returned to the Central School Dlstr.c: is a result of going off double sessions A great deal of the unanticipatee students are those returning from private schools now that • Central is off double sessions. This large group of students returning from the private schools has resulted in an impaction at Central HowE�er, Ken has stated that although they mdy lose some face, the 8.1 A. is nct sympathetic to this new development. The B.I.A.'s position is that Central should take advantage of SB -96 whi:h allows for the sale of $600,000 bonds with an advisory vote. Film at 11:00 p m. P.S. The impaction had necessitated adding one new classroom and teacher at Cucamonga Junior High. Interestingly enough, Denise Hogan has been appuinted to that position effective November 1, 1979 JR:ba ORDINANCE NO. 69 -E AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGI, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 8 OF ORDINANCE NO. 70 AS AERNDED BY ORDINANCE NO 69A WHICH PERTAINS TO THE FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL FACILITIES, TO INCREASE FEES THEREUNDER, AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEDICATION OF LAND IN LIEU THEREOF, AIM DECLARING THE UFDENCY THEREOF The City Council of the Citv of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 8 of Ordinance He. 90 as amended by Ordinance No. 69 of the City of Rancho Cucamouga, California, Is hereby amended by ammdiag Subsection (a)(2) to read as follows: "(2) For development wfthIv .i Centrel School District, 02,070.00 per single - family dwelling A i 4%4 00 per mobile he= space or each unit of a m:lliple -unit dwelling structure which contains two (2) or more bedrooms. SECTION 2. The City Councll does hereby find and daclare that this Ordinance is for the Immediate presor tinn of the public peace, health or safety, and shall cake effect immediately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance. •SECTION 7: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be pub- lished within fifteen (15) darn after its passage, at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, ind ADOPTM this _ day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Ver CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE, November 1, 1979 TO, City Council c A City Manager FROM, Jack I =, Director of COMMUALLY DEvelepmnt SUBJEM Apphel of Planning Commission action for a request of waiver o{ Conditions of approval for the property located + 100' went of the Davors Frowsy on the south side of Foothill Boulevard known as BoavOr Building Supplies ABSTRACT, On October 10, 1979, the planning vommissim denied the applicants' ABSTRAC for a waiver of the conditions of approval of Resolution No. 79 -40 and directed or applicant to eeaah and desist h -e operation immediately. The week or September 26, 1979, the City Attorney sent Mt. ng Supplieseato the sitenlocated to coaaa and desist the operation of eeavar Building Supplies on the south side of Foothill Boulevard adjacent to Ns Devote Freevay. Mt. LOn Iley had O,menced operation of the use by locating building matorials and a • cona:.rUCCion snack on the site without mating � conditions Of approval Staff met with the manager of the yard on MtndA October 1, 1979 and an m result of that motinY Mr. Longley requested that the Planning Caoalssion allow improvement schedule ae hie operations while providing the improvements per an lap at.achod. (See exhibit 1). Staff has visited the site an of October 10, 1979 and the aP2t cent is opinion o[ full operation without mating any conditions of Approval mould wreath a iinionoof the Planning Commission that this procedure, if ellowad, it next precidonc for the City and make t to impossible for the City to insure that all conditions of approval be met The Resolution a ttached approved Director peVfev No. 7946 nub act to the conditions listed. No rations vote to have camenced until all conditions of achroval had been mt. If the city were !n the practice of allowing operations to ee®eAC bet a compliance with condition of approval. vein would have many uses in operation without improvements landscaping, etc., g residential, comhtrial in addition to industrial. It is incumbent upon City staff to make sure teal all conditions Of aPProval aa t -Or Occupancy hold a project 0 site and comencement of business make it ooze to impossible S acts within the City at for compliance with conditions- There are many Pro various time which era held from operating due to the lack ofomplianco with the In some casor, it comes down to one condition of approval conditions of approval. being mt before the business can caemeoee. In oth er eases it is more than just one condition that has to be mt before the business comances In addition tocosmoncing his operation on the site, without complying with conditions of approval, the applicant has graded the site without grtding puts, violated the site plan approved under the Director Review, wing a trailer on e w alto without Site Approval, erected a sign without sign peralts, [skin; access to the site from slag and aot inaAC PavingtAS required by the approved sits Plan storage Yam is in Caltrans Permits' (F7 R4COK4EICDATIONt The Planning Co®ission recosxenda that rho City Ca cil deny the applicant's request ead direct the applicnnt to cease and desist his operation isrsediately. Res ctfull a �P1pJ11 `V JM�C J Dl:eCtor oC Community Development JL,BXAtcc Letter Prom Tracy Lowman Sibbale dated October 9, 1979 Attachments, Exhibit 1, Rover Building Supplies Improvement Schedule Planning Commission Staff Report for October 10, 1979 Meeting planning Commission Keating Minutes Ocotbem 10, 1979 • 0 W1 RI 0 C7 '.w a" I" JONES AND PITTULLO ..w,m eY.. ... Lo••o.., mY 7 •�OYL• V. IOY i• r0Y OOr t! •..e• .o.�r.Y ••owe October 16, 1979 Mr Lauren Wasserman City Clerk City of Panrho Cucamonga P O Box 793 Rancho Cucrimonga, CA 91730 lUIP ....O e[[0Y0 .VC..c VP Nm GUr'M"N W1780 Re: Notice of appeal planning commission decision of October 10, 1979 Appellant William Longley Dear Mr. tasserman: By means of this letter we hereby notify you of the appeal of Mr. William Langley of the decision of the planning commission on October 10, 1979 that he cease ano desist operation of his business known as Beaver Building Supply in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The undersigned, as fir. Longley's attorney,respectfully requests that the city council hear the matter ar.d allow me to appear in benalf of my client to discuss the merits of the request of the applicant for revision of planning commission resolution 79 -40. Please direct all communication concerning this appeal to the city council to the undersigned at the above address. Tank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, J TRAC OWMAN TIBBALS TLT /lh cc: Barry Ifogan Jack Lan Edward A. Hopson Robert E. Dougherty Harman Rempel 77 'Aw o.r.etS JONES AND f ITTULLO • .O. '.O fiC0M0 .V(MVe .•o wr• . O'.re ur".0. GL WKWA OlaaO . r... o... • ,,..o •r.v wowr n. eu•e rep ...o+ oo••ra October 9, 1979 llr Jack Lam Director of Connunity Development p 0 Box 797 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91770 /lllim 1979-Reconsideration of Re: Resolution numbers,79-40-Propertybof N 1.ongle Duar l.r. Lam: I was referred to your office by Mr Robert E nougherty, Assistant City Attornev who Indicated to me that I night obtain s continuance by contacting you Ihis letter was written pursuant to a telephone convecsat ion with your office during which I was advised that if this letter were to rea,h you by noon ou October 10, 1979, a cvo -week continuance would be ootained. During the following two week, I intend to meet with you and the city staff in hopes of resciva.,g any differences between the city and Hr Longley At your earliest convenience f should like to meet* with botJ,•you and Hr Ilo Ba° s° u,at we c13J9akcihe sublectt matted Hr Dougherty's letter of September 28, then can be considered, should the city planning staff desire, at the next commission meeting Very truly yours. JONES 6 PITTULLO A Professional Law Corpo;atLon r ( / ��� �� t•,. to „ r �. �(�' BY TRA J LOUIIAN TIBBALS TLTllh cc: Nr. Ill I lam 1 0nr1 cv Hr lluv.,rd Nelsweavcr llr Barry Hogan Hr Robert E nougherty 11, Edward E II°pson n L I i CITY OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 10, 1979 To: Planning Commission From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -26 - LONCLEY - Request for Phasing of Conditions of Approval of Resolution No 79-40 ABaTRACT: The week of September 24th the City Attorney s nt Mr Longley a letter to cease and desist the operation of Beaver Building Supplies at the site located on the south aide of Foothill Blvd adjacent to the Devote Freevav Mr Longley had commenced operation of the use by locating building materials and a conatruction sheet on the site without meeting any ecndltlons of approval Staff met with the Manager of the yard on Monday, October 1 and an a result, Nr Longley is requesting that the Planning Commission allow him to continue present operations while providing the improvement+ per the Improve- ment schedule attached (See Exhibit 1) It is cur epinlon that this procedure as allowed would create a dangerous precedent for the City and make it next to impossible for the City to insure that all conditions of approval have been met The Resolution approves Direc- tor Review Nc 79 -26 subject to the Conditions listed. No operations are to commence until all conditions of approval have been met. If the City were to allow Nr Longley to continue his present operation. we would have to allow this to happen for all uses within the City and therefore, tmuld have :any commercial, industrial, and residential users on vacant unimproved property promising to do improvements at some later dice with no guarantee of completion. It to incumbent upon City staff to cake sure that all conditions of approval are met Occupancy Of a site and commencement of business makes it next to impossible for staff to hold a project for compliance with conditions. There are many projects within the City at the present time such as the Alpha Beta Center which is being hold up from a full opening due to the lack of compliance with complete conditions of approval. They have the site 902 complete and we are holding occupancy for them. It would be grossly unfair If the Commission were to allow this request In addition to diluting all staff authority in seeking compliance with conditions of approval RECOIDIENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny the applicants request and dlr.)11ct the applicant to cease and desist his operation immediately. Res PC if l- suEmltted. JACK rector of Community Development JL:BKR:nm Attachments: Exhibit 1, Beaver Building Supply Improvment Schedule Planning Commission Resolution No 79-40 ITEM "I" I P n d O CI ♦y W(mp r 0 9 • O U p n� V E• pl U E1 1 �t N it C W U 4] Ll W(mp r 0 9 • al 'AI n-t LQ 14 W iS RCSOLUTION to 79 -6n A RESOLUTION OF 711E RANCHO C11CANO11:A PIANNI"G WIDIISSION APPROVING DIRECTOR LEVIEV hO 79 -26 LOCATED ON TIIE SOLrH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BLVD ADJACENr TO THE DEVORE FRFFWAI IN TIIE C -2 Arm H ME MIEREAS, on the 21st day of Hatch. 1979, a complito application was filed for review of the above described orojeer; and k71FRFAS, on the 11th tiny of April, 1979, the• Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hold a meeting to consider the dhovr described pro- ject; and WHEREAS, this term vas edrtinued for further Information and again heard on tit 250h Jav of April, 1979 NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAIIONCA PIANNIM C=JISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 • Tlut the following ft dings have been made: I rhat the site Imlicnttd by Thal developvmu plan In ,wj "I""tc In -17c anal .Rape to deromevdatc the • propa,e.l use and all yards, spaces, walls• fences, parking. lantistaping, loading and other features rcgnlred by this see-to, 2 That the lmpruvements as indicated on the develop- ment Plan are located In such a manner as tt he Properly related to existing and proposed streets and I,Ighvays 1 That the Improvements ds shown or till develolment plan are consistent with all adopted +taltdordv and politic., as set forth in this ,,tlion SECT IOtt That tills project will not erotic adverse impacts on the euy lromment dud that a Ncgat lve DoelaratJ••n is Issued pre,. loosiv SFCTION_ 1_ Th.tt Olrt, for Review No 79 -2o is approved subject to the folltwiug Condit Ions: A"PI scant -Lnll contact tit Planning Dielsion for coal- P1 lauec with the f011owing eont'll tons: 1 Tht area 1`•Ot from the wvhtern Property line to the first row of lurking for the propusvd illdse I shall (� be land"aped T1 2 Tile landscape buffer Pruluud tur the building material storage yard .,hall have a minimum of 202 of the trees 24" lox or Innl•er Mme• d The access atcns in the storage yird shall be surfaced with dust reducing material such as • stag. gravel, paving or the like 4 Building material storage shall not exceml the top of the eastlwebt truce for a distance of 50' 5 Parking lot lights 5'011 he a maximum height of 12 and directed awry from all property Ilnes. adjacent streets and rr.hl.•ntcs 6 Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon sire 7 All two -wav alsle widths shall In: a minimum of 7, feet wide 9 Anv signs proposed for thl. develolaent shall be designed in evarormante whit Comptelicus Lve Stan Urdt- namv .and shall require r "ttv ar.d approval by the Planning Division prior to InstaLlat L-n cf such signs 9 A detailed lardscare and lrrlgatlnn plan shall be sub - mltr d to and approved fly the Planning Division (within 60 days) after the Issuance of building pemlta V 10 All IAndscarcd areas blial' be e.alrltalned In d healthy tip and thriving colditluna fr••c from weeds, trash and debris It Street -reel, a olaimum rf 1 action site or larger, shall by I"(-Iled to a ^vwrd;nr•• with the Master Plan of street trees for LLe Cl(v of Rancho Cucamonga 1' Slty 011111 be Jeveloped lu aceordance wit'% the approved sit, plan on fill. In the• riantlog Division And tltn c, d(tlotu contained 1lvreth 13 Tr.ah receptacle are t %1011 be unclosed by s 6 foot high m..sonry wall with gala•% pxtrsuirt ,o City standards. lu.atlon to th,_ satisfartlon of tic Planntre Division, I4 All ro.l appnirttntanery Inrludlug air oerdttlonars shall bt ut hit..tur.tlpy jut ,-gist ' .ud bhl.lded itam view and tl, sau•td bwffered it,, ud)atrnt pr -,patties ark] strer.b a• tlu "at is' .c• 111 o th i•larning 9lvtslon and 0an1'Ilug 011 tai 15 Approval of this re,liest ,hall it..t excuse compliance w'th all :.e.tlnns o the 7on.ag Or•lluancr and all other aPrllcal•l+• My Ord anres In effect at time of building v permit I.-uanct Ity7C _ \pptl all shall ,nnta,t tbo Itut l.Itng DIV laton fair cucpllance with the lull"Itir :nlldlllous: 16 Tile applicant ,hall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Duildlag Code, uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, tlational Electric Code, and all other applicable c.dee aml ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project 17 This approval sha!' become null and said if building permits are not iss, •J for this Crolect within one 5var I am tike ,l-rte JI ntajul JI-NeVal 18 Cridiug of the subject pryorty shall be In accordance with the Crading Ordinance and to tl:c satisfaction of the Building Dffirlal 19 This approval fa for phase I of tie development only Appllc Jnt shall cunt�ttt tie rnuthill Fire District and the Luc um„nga County uit.r District for compliance with the full owing conditions: 20 Water supply and sanitary sewer facilities shall be- . provldeJ to the speclficatlnns of the Cucamonga County Water District it'd the City Engineer with all incidental fees paid by the developer 21 Frior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction evidence shall be submitted to the Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is avail- able. 22 Emergency access shall be provided and matncained free and clear at a minimum of 24 tent at all times during construction to the satisfaction of tlue Fire Chief Apnllcaot sit -all contact the rngincering Division for com- pliance with tike following conditions: 21 Street dedication and 1 Provements shall be in ronformanee with the turreutly .tdopted !Lister Plan of Streets and Ilighwys and to the spetificatlon of the City Engineer. 24 All exter,or street lmpr.vements shall be constructed to the suttafactbnl of the City Fuglnoer, ptior to occupancy. 25 TIIL following missing street lnprnvccents shall be con- striated labial, include, but are nut lis tu.d to: side- walk, drlv,iays, wheel chair ramps, curb and gutter, street paving, street trees, street lighta, and drainage structures 26. Str :ct Improvement plans prepared by a registered Civil Fngtncer shall be submitted for approval by the City fllgl l er 27 Street strlpl,,l: and signing shall be Installed to the satisfaction u1 � tile city Engineer �_ 5 2.4 The City rescrvts the right to require reciprocal easenents ensuring nc COSS to adjacent prop0rtles as required hey future develolment. • 29 All damaged off site rubl!- tro -ks facilities. Including parkway trees, shall be repaired prior to occupancy to the sotafactinn of the City Engineer 10 All street structural svetilln, shall be nulcaittud to, alit] appruved b) cite CIt1 Englnccr 11 Orading of subject property shall be le accordance with plaan and a 50114 rerort prepared by I qualified eonlnecr to tho Hatlsfacllell of the City Eng Ltcer 32 All proposed utilities within the project shall be Installed underground 11 Utility easements shall be provided to the speclflca- tinn td the appropriate utllit> comPanted and the City. Eng beer 1'. Ikveloper shall coordinate, and pay for, the relocation of any paver poles 0r other existing public utilities, as requtreJ v 15 Street lighting shall be Installed by the applicant • and the advance energeney charges paid 16 Proposed JOVClulmcnc falls within those areas indt- cnted as subject to fL „d Lng under the Rational Flood Insurance Prog.= and will be subject to the provisions t: of sald program APPROVED ANT) AUOPrEU 11115 25f11 nAY OF APRIL, 1979 PUNNING CMINISSION OF THE CITY 0 RMICHO CUCAlIO•:FA BY Ik rmM Rmpot, Ca mM, ATTESI: ., Secretary at ❑IC Pl inn Ing Corms s4lu, 1, JACK UM. Secretary of the Planning Ctlinlsslon of the City of Rancho Cucmauga, do herebv certify th.lt fill- It.rvgolug Re4ttlnllon was duly and regularly LntrWuutd, P.ts,td, anti 0011tid Icy till- Planning Ctmmission of ..r etc City of Randnt wt nmrnga At a relpi I. it nett LOA Of thv Plans lag Ccm- S mission field o lilt. ISth .I.1$ of April, 1979, by the following vote to -wit: AI ES: CO!PI ISSIOMMS: BAIB., GARCIA. TOLSIOY, RL'IPEL NOES: W!IHISS[O:ILRS: UUAF ABSENT: CtCtd IS5I0i.1TtS: JO;.hS J / ti EICf RpT FROM pLA.MNING CO.jHlssr0N MINUTES OF OCTOBER 10, 1)79 Director Review No. 79 -26 - LONGLEy - Request for phasing of conditions. Barry Hogan. Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report Staff recommend, that the planning Commission deny the applicant's request end direct the applicant to cease and desist his operation ismadfately He indicated a letter has been received from Mr Tracy Lowman Tlbbals of Jones and Pittullu law offices, requesting a two weak continuation of this request in hopes of resolving any differences betvean the City and Mr Langley. As was discussed with the attorney, Mr Langley wants to ask that the building not be const"ctad at this time and a temporary trailer be located until such tams as he feels a purnanent building is justified fie explained to the attorney that this is a separate ianuo Iie is talking about modification to the approval and talking about using the site before any of the conditions of approval have been met. They are currently trying to landscape the site but that is still beside the fact that they are in operation and the conditions cif approval have not been met chairman Rempel asked for comments from the rudience Mr Tracy Lowman Tibbila stated he is representing Mr Langley who in not present tonight lie Indicated he has been involved in this matter for only 48 hours It is felt the economic impact on this development. in light of the surrounding land uce, that the development of a building supply yard at that location would seem short lived at beat He would hope that the Cormission would Allow an opportunity to meet with staff to re-evaluate what Mr. Langley wants to request and have the opportunity to work together Thi's is not a request for a stalling tactic but basically to have the oppurtunity to fully analyze the situation. tie asked that the Commission consider a two week continuation of this matter Mr Hopcon stated their office sent a letter to Mr Langley cpproximately L2 days ago notifying :him that the use of the site be ceased within a period of ten days. As of this date he has not complied with this letter Commissioner Garcia stated he would not have any objectfnn to continuing this matter for two wanks as a matter of due process. Chairman pempol stated this is a very serious problem It appears to him there has been no real good faith intention to comply with the conditions of the Resolution At this time it sounds as though there is a goof poss'bility that in a very short time the building supply yard ion't even going to be feasible at this location To continue this At this Limo, in his opinion, would give Mr Langley an indication that we might change our mind and he is not in agreement with the continuation It is his o:)inim the Comsissi,, went ova -board in trying to work something out for this develop- ment and at this time it should be required that he cease operation until the conditions proviously required be met Commissioner Tolstoy stated at the time Nr. Langley first came to the City for approval of this request, it won known by him what the general plan far the area indicated. In the Commisalons' del gyrations, it was pointed out that wo wanted the supply yard to be well designed so that It would fit in that area. It irritates him when people C. ',to the City and place a temporary trailer on a lot than come in and ask if it is + .ght with the City to do this. Mr Langley know he was not to operate until thu conditions of approval within the Resolution were cOMPlfed with, and he was not given any approval to place the trailer on the site. It in his opinion the operation should be discontinued immediately. /1)7 Iry tpt Irom 1 lannlerl VIMML•L'11w11 Mln the d IwWWr 10, 1'179 Page 3 Mr. Tibbals stated the icsus of precedence and concerns of a fledgl!ng City in establishing firm guidelines for planning and land use are understan.'able He has no grounds for contending that that should no: be the case Although Mr. Longley is our client, the real party in interest in this natter is Mr weiswaavvr who is employed by Mr Langley to manage the building supply business Mr. keisweaver is actively involy �d in making improvements to the site Mr waisweaver is acting in good faith to meet the conditions of the Resolution. Chairman Rempel stated ty looking at the r- hedule press. ted by Beaver Building Supply, no grading plan has been approved, no paving plan has been submitted, and they have not even started those improvements as yet This doosn't tell me that they are working with the City in good faith Mr Tibbals stated Mr weisweavor did obtain a business license from the City in July. They have had plans for approximately two months for the structure on the promises He interpreted the granting of the business 1! °unse to be able to legally constants business Chairman Rempel stated he has not built his building that is to house a lot of material that he is into tng to sell, does not even have an encroachment permit from the State. Therefore, he can't even drive onto the site legally Hs has gone out and anloaded a bunch of material without any State or City approval Mr. Lam stated he might note that both Me Longley and Hr woisweaver were present in a meeting with staff at which tine the conditions within the Resolution were discussed with them. Me Aeiaweaver was made aware at that time that the business could not legally operate until all conditions of approval were mat At a previous Comminsion meeting, it was fete- incd .hat landscaping and terming along I -15 was required before• the material yard eve ant started He fools it is a hallow argument to discuss the whole issue of the t a'.ler on the site when the use has gone in without meeting the conditions of appraval C..amissionor Garcia stated in his cctxrn' Vat this be continued for two weeks, he did not mean for that to try to indicate t!'a' , +e Commission ought to change their previous decision on this matter He asked that the Commission bapollad as to whether or rot they its in favor of continuing this matter for two weeks or if they wish to go ahead and take action tonight Upon polling the Commission on continuing the matter for two weeks, Commissioner Garcia was the only Commissioner in favor of the continuation A motion was then mado by Commissioner Tolstoy and seconded by Commissioner Jones to deny the request and direct the applicant to cease and desist his operation irmadiamly AYESI TOLSTOY, JONES, GARCIA. RMIPEL !'OESI MC11E ARSOrrs OAHL 0