Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/11/21 - Agenda Packet
'1 • AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM04GA Regular Neetina Neighborhood Center 9791 Arrow Pighway Rancho Cucaminga November 21, 1979 AGENDA ITEILS -- NOTE: All items submitted for the Cicy Coux_. agenda oust be In writing. The deadline for submitting items is 5:v, p n the Thursday prior to the first and third Wednesday of each month. The City Clerk's office receives all such Moms 1. CALL TO ORDER. scl� Via„+. , ct k •uy A. PLEDGE TO FLAG. B. ROLL CALL: Mikels_, Palombo�, Schlosser, Bridge, Frost_ C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Council b. Staff 3 CON41TTEE REPORTS a Advisory Commission b. Historical Commission a. CONSENT CALENDAR. Tho following Consent Calendar !toms are erp -ctod to be routine and non- coutroversial They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion Any Council member, staff member, or interested party any request that an .tom be removed from Cho Consent Calendar for later dismission. a. Approval of Warrants: Register No 79- 11 -21; for $369,084.86 1 b. Re`er late claim for Laura Jean Soderberg in the amount of 3 s16,800 to the City Attorney for handling c Approval of Alcoholic Beverage license;request by Mary and 13 Robert Equi, 100006 Foothille Blvd for On Sale General (transfer of names) City Council Agenda -2- November 21, 1979 • d Tract 9596 Release Bond to Gary Miller Location: east side of Carnelian, north of Banyan Performance Bond (landscaping) $18,150 Tract 9430: Release Bond to R. L Sievers 6 ions Location: Northwest corner Haven and Wilson Performance Bond (water) $45,000 e. Award of Landscape Maintenance Contract to Southern California Landscape Maintenance Company and authorize execution of the contract. As previously authorized, the Engineering Division on November 1, 1979 advertised to receive bids for the lendscape maintenance of city parkhays Bids were received on this contract on November 15, 1979 The only bidder was the Southern California Landscape Management Company with a total bid of $36,276 54 for an 18 month period. f Parkway Maintenance Funding and Budget Transfer The City Council recently approved the implementation of a parkway maintenance program developed through contract with Roy Jorgensen and Associates As a part of the implementation of this program, it is required that the City budget be adjusted to reflect the new program and to complete the transfer of funds froin the Community Services budget to the Engineering Division budget An additional allocation from reserve funds will also be required to complete funding of the program. 14 17 28 Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council take the following action, Transfer $74,520 from the Salaries and Equipment of the Community Services budget to the Engineering budget; and authorize the following distribution of Engineering funds salaries - $19,697; services and supplies- $34,823; capital outlay - $20,000 9 Approval of Bond for Charles Coggin of Vitro Strand Technologies, 31 Inc (for streets) __ — Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No 79 -92 directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign th- improvement agreement on behalf of the city. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -92 43a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ® AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO 79 -39 City Council Ayenda _3_ November 21, 1979 h Vacation of OtFer of Dedication for Alder Street by Ronald 44 Spiers. This request originated when Mr Spiers applied for his u property oni the oexisting9Offer bofcCedication at of According to Ordinance No 59 -A, the construction of I garage does NOT require the dedication of right -of -way cr the construction of st -eet improvements, so no new dedications can be required of Mr Spiers The existing Offer of Dedication has been completely superseded and is worthless to the city RECOMMNDATON vacateEthisl0fferlofiDedicat recommended approved, lsetting fai to public hearing for December 5, 1979 46a RESOLUTION NO 79 -93 RESOLUTIO3 OF THE DECLARING OF ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ALDER AS STREET. THE OFFICE OF E CITY AP CLERK 1 Map subdivision westisting 44 of of Turner. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt Resolution No 79 -95 accepting the Hap of Paforlthep 9 city and This Engitcer0toyforwardtthe mapiformrecording RESOLUTION N0. 79 -95 48a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C52239 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. PARCEL NO. 5239) j Vacation of 8th Street requested by Linville- Sanderson -Horn, agents 49 for Jerry Swenson Mrs Swenson is owner of a plot of land south of the area proposed to be vacated The land will be used for private development This area of 8th Street has a physical dead Dal Creeke Ittise presently tundeveloped, eand ythere i is no public access to the street Resolution No 79-96 79-961 and set the epublic hea�ingy for uJanuaryp2 1980• y 51a RESOLUTION NO 79 -96 {. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF i' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF 8TH STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP N0. A V -004 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. 11 City Council Agenda -4- November 21, 1979 k Lion's Park Community Center Landscaping RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Community Services Department to seek bids and award contract for landscaping and Irrigation on Lion's Park Community Center. S. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. An Ordinance establishing the Residential Growth Management an. Report by Jac lam. ORDINANCE NO. 86 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING 4 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDEN- TIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY • OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 0 6 CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Advisor Commisslon's recommendation to re eal Ordinance No. 78 a ow ng ar the sae of safe and sane f rewor s Report by Jim Robinson B North Town Street Name Charges. Report by Lloyd Hubbs. 53 62 82 84 RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending that Council proceed with a public hearing for street name changes to Feron Boulevard for 24th Street, Jersey for 25th Street, and McKinley for 26th Street A Resclution of Intent needs to be adopted to set the public hearing. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -94 90 A RESOLUTION, OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIZY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMGNCA, CALIFORNIA, fl €GLARING ITS \ICI INTENTION TO CHANGE THE NAMES OF'241H. 25TH, 0 26TH STREETS gc 1 + City Council Agenda -5- November 21, 1979 C. Re nest D the Southern California Edison Company. Report by 91 Lauren asserma,� The Southern California Edison Company has requested that the City Council consider iacmansfrcat enitldaali Energy Commission's P relimnr y demdoes entitled Energy Demand 1978 -2000 Apparently, there is a discrepancy between the forecast prepared by the California Energy Commission and those prepared by the Southern California Edison Company A representative of the Southern California Edison Company will be in attendance at the city council meeting to explain the differences in the two forecasts and to respond to any questions members of the City Council may have concerning the proposals The primary difference in the two philosophies is that the CEC has forecasted a peak demand growth in the area served by the Edison Company at a rate of 1.4% per year dison Company' 1978-1990 s forecast for 9the Same period which contrasts s sharply with the 3 l: annual growth RESOLUTION NO 79 -98 95a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COK41SSION D. Appeal of Planning Commission decision regardingResolution No. 79 -09 96 RECOtM1ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council deny the applicant's appeal upholding the Planning Commission's decision. E. Industrial Assessment District 79 -01 Status Report. Report by Lloyd 110 Hub DS. F Restructurtn of the Communit Develo nt Block Grant Pro ram's 129 C t zen artic at on Adv sor Coma ttee from County function to city function. by B 1 Aolley. G Alcohol Education Program. Oral report by Lauren Wasserman The City Council has deferred action concerning the request for funds from the Alcohol Education Program until such time as a number of critical questions have been ciarif'.d It is recomended that tie City Council taple the issue because a committee of elected officials has formed to deal with the problem on a more comprehensive basis The effort is bein� peirheaded by the mayors of the cities of Ontario and Upland. Those two elected officials have become involved in an effort to obtain additional County funds for support of the Alcohol Education Program. If Council is in concurrence with the suggestion, it will be appropriate for the City Council to instruct the staff to draft a letter indicating the city's support of County funding for the Alcoholc Education P ngram. 0 SCity Council Agenda -6- November 21, 1979 H. A Resolution establishing a license fee For bingo. 130 Report by Harry En�pev RESOLUTION NO 79 -97 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING A LICENSE FEE FOR THE OPERATION OF BINGO GAMES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 7 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8. NE:: S NESS. mncil b Audience 4) 9. ADJOURNMENT. Vi CI■ R067 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P WARR A VEN M V E N 0 0 R N A M E 00304 7805 POST "ASTER OU305 1200 BANK OF AMERICA 00306 3305 MPLOYMENT DEV DEPT BANK OOJ08 7185 MAGICI`nI PACIFIC 00309 6725 LEAGUE OF CAL F CITIES 00310 4140 FOUR -K EQUIPMENT 00311 7376 MONAHAN CLAUDIA 00312 8372 SO SFCTI CN C C A P A 00314 83455 tSHELHCYLACREGG 00316 83173 SAt7L6 NDNO "O0 EMPLOY C SHARP 2441 02547 CO S OF SAN `4 IA02691 VOID FORMS AL GNMFMT 02692 V010 FORMS ALIGNMENT 02693 VOID ALIGNMENT LNKEY 02694 0002 AFAA A OLE 01695 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT, A H 02696 0155 AFFA -TATI C0 02697 0240 A TA LOMA AUTO PARTS 02698 1040 Gt«90ON AYERS CAMERA SHO 02699 1200 BANK OF AMERICA 02700 1300 HASELINE MAROWAR11 02701 1700 BREASHEARS, 11081E 1940 02703 CURLJAESCHKE INC 2275 LHAFFEYEHUMANELSUCIETY (, 07705 07707 2380 BOOK 0 /ARTHUR7fNC 02708 2450 CO SAN BERNAROINO SHERI �. 02709 2575 CUCAHO'1GA CO WATER GIST 02710 2580 CUCAMONGA HARDWARE 02711 2595 CUCAMONGA PRINTI IG 02712 2600 CUCAMONGA SCHOOL OIST ,f 02713 2650 GAILY REPORT 027.4 2890 OREM CARRIAGE CO 02716 3175 03 THEITI,, EMPIRE CO 4600 RAL 07718 GENE TE`BEVHONC CO 02719 4605 GENES ALL COLOR PAINT 02721 48350 HEOENORYCK5NCDAN 02722 4901 A HOLLEY, W - PETTY CASH V 02724 5140 INLAND POWER SWEEPING 027 5190 INTEt;RATED 02726 5265 INTERNATIO14ALCASSOCIATT 02727 5275 INTL CITY MGT ASSOC 6220 ROYLJORGENSONGASSOC 02729 INC 02730 7175 CHRISTOPHER CHEWULET, 02731 7L95 MARTIN, JOHN L 02732 7197 RCHALO MARTIN C lSSOC 02733 7200 MARTINEZ UN ON FERVICE 02734 7295 1ICRfl DATA SERVILES 02735 7303 MILES, FREDDIc 8 02736 7340 ALLEN C MITCHELL C SON L 0.737 7375 MONAHAN, CLAUDIA 02738 7500 OAYALANNN MD, N �a EE 7 If807 02740 POWER LO 8ATfERIES 0,741 0 7820 PR O COLOR PRESS 02743 -742 7823 PRIN1` BOCK STORE 7825 PRWER SS RULLETI'1 02744 8045 RANCHO DISPOSAL SERVICE /� ``� RCOTR 02747 02748 8127 RCARCS 8245 4COGT RY ,` SCOT 14EDICAL LAD 02750 RUSSELL, 8285 KEITH 4 MARR DATE NET 1,500.OD 4,446.53 1,921.02 100,000.00 152.00 40.00 23.00 100.00 20.00 38.00 976.00 26.55 88.00 88,962.30 1.59— 139, It It 4, 1, 1,0 1 I It'!E R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAR ( WARR Y YEN / V E N 0 0 R N A M E WARN DATE r NET or ( Cttvp 0227521 02753 02754 02755 02756 0:757 02758 0-'759 07760 02761 2762 02763 02764 02766 02767 02768 8301 8360 8390 8395 8398 8478 8525 8532 8544 9050 9148 9158 9290 9995 VOID S A M TS LES SKINNER COMM HOSPIT SOUTHERN CALIF ED1SO1: SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO SOUTHLAND PAPER CO SPECIALTY TYPEWRITER SV S5TATIONERS CORP SULLIVAN, R SUPERINTENDENT DOCUMENT URBAN pIE51CNTRUST CO VALN{G, & LASING SYSTEM VELO-81NO WELLS ENDRUryryJjTEOSAAY YUKON OISPOSAL SERVICE FINAL TOTALS 111/21/79 ii7811�799 1111/21/79 - /21/79 /21/79 1121/79 1/21/79 11/21/79 1}1/21/79 i�iPM 11 11 /211/21;179 79 11/21/79 11/21/79 2101.996 128.19 1,386.54 22.83 165.28 45.00 323.56 583.00 15.00 165.00 3i 839 33 40.00 369.084.86 s � d 2 t C �C E C C C C C r C .,lfl C b nu� L 2 1 2 4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 11 11 w.Bv -L ed_el� 11-11-79. Anderson, Toves ono Reever Attorneysatlaw 5.081 S'CGm01e BU.Id��g P O Bor 1357 1365 Well roolnulBoure•ortl UG1aaG Co:AO,+m91756 (714)955 9643 Aaomen for Claimant (UAGGGCi W"Rn GnA"9NLr) C L: J ^ • y , 0 CITY CF RRKCCO CUCA4X,'JCA ACUWN -THAT,CM NOV 1 1 1979 �f P.M 7181QIm131V1113131416)6 CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITI Claim of: ) Case No. LAURA JEAN SODERBERG, previously ) CLAIM FOR PERSONAL INJURIES known as LAURA JEAN McALPINE, ) (SECTION 910 OF THE GOVERN - Claimant, ) MENT CODE) • vs 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD 15 OF CONTROL, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY 16 CLERK OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 17 CALIFORNIA, 19 20 21 22 Z4 25 r 26 27 2e sp Defendants. TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF CONTROL; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; AND CITY CLERK Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA: I YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that LAURA JEAN SODERBERG,previous known as LAURA JEAN MCALPINE,Whose address is 312 Avalon Court, 1 Upland, California 91786, claims damages from the City of Raucho Cucamonga, California, County of San Bernardino and State of California, in the amount, comduted as of the date of presentation of this claim, of $15,800 00 This claim is based an personal injuries sustained by -1- 3 i 1 r I I 1 claimant on or aoout January 9 1979, at t'ae intersection of 2l 19th Street and Jasper Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 31 under the following circumstances 4 Applicant was operating her motor vehccle east- bound on said 19th Street when she was struck by 5 another vehicle proceeding southbound on Jasper Street Prior to and subsequent to the accident, the inter - 6 section where the accident occurred had been con- trolled and is now controlled by stop signs for the 7I north and southbound traffic on Jasper Street For some reason, unknown to ao::licant the stoo sign 4d for the southbound traffic on Jasper Street was miosing at the time of applicant's accident 10 11 12 13 14 151 161 171 is 4 2' 1I .2 it 2911 25 20 II allyj, .n.L•.\W. levee l f� aa[I, IA M I.Ip Y. \l IlY4 L J The names of the public employees causing claimant's injuries under the described circumstances are unknown to applican� The injuries sustained by claimant, as far as known as I of the date of the presentation of this claim, consist of a nose �i fracture and a fracture to one of the patellas and claimant is i still under care and treatment for the fracture of the patella 1 1 The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of tinis ; claim is computed as follows Damages incurred to date Expenses for medical and hospital care Lose of earnings (approximately) Genera_ damages To:-. aa-maA , incurred .o date Est_marea :,, pe.:.ve dame,,., a, as krDun Future expeises for medical an-. hospital care Future loss of earnings Other pr,spective special damages f $ 30C OC (s, } 500 0C 15.000.00 $15,800 00 1 I $ unknown I .inknown unknown. i J S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 D 9 10 it 12' 33 • 14 15 16 17 16 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 au.w.a.:.n. ..eevo �N1f, 11K Estimated prospective damages (cont ) Prospective general damages $ unknown Total estimated prospective damages $ unknown Total amount claimed as of date of presentation of claim $15,800 00 All notices or other comminications with regard to this claim should be sent to claimant to care of ANDERSON, TAVES AND REEVER, P. 0 Box 1357; 1365 West Foothill Blvd , Suite 1, Upland, California DATED November 9, 1979 ANDERSON,)TA ``JES AN)D MEVER - By: �� (t1 %/�I -3- A Z, 2 a 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Anoe,son. oon WDeever eyr of Su�,ol s'O Bo 1357u la'np 1365 W u✓ r OO,MII BOU'"O'd uolu� 716)985 9643 I186 Auomen for Claimant IVACC OEWW MR TS3G it ON17) CITY CF f, %Cl L LV:111'411A Iv N :r v 1 1979 7f81911U1 4Uj 112131415P6 CLAIM AGAf11ST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY Claim of: LAURA JEAN SODERBERG previously known as LAURA JEAN MCALPINE, Claimant, Case No APPLICATION FOR LAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM ON'BEHALF OF CLAIMANT I vs l 14 ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD ) 15 OF CONTROL BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CITY ) 16 CLERK OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) CALIFORNIA, ) 17 ) Defendants ) 18 ) 19 TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF CONTROL; BOARD 20 OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN*BERNARDIN , AND CITY CLERK OF 21 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 22 1 Application is hereby made for leave to present a late 23 claim founded on a cause of action for personal injuries which 241 occurred on January 9, 1979, and for which a claim was not presented 25 within the 100 -day period provided by Section 911 2 of the Governmen 26 Code Fqr additional circumstances relating to the cause of action, 27 reference is made to the proposed claim attached to this applicatv 28 i 2 The failure to present this claim within the 100 -day -1- 9 I i 9 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 27. 23 24 25 26 27 ® 28 •�avu rwren,u ro.nn period specified by Section 911 2 of the Government Code was throus mistake, inadvertence, surprise, and excusable neglect, and the State of California State Board of Control; County of San Ber- nardino and City of Rancho Cucamonga, California were not prejudice by this failure, all as more particularly shown by the attached declaration of Attorney JOHN D TAVES 3 This application is being presented within a reasonably time after the accrual of this cause of action, as more particular) shown by the attached declaration of JOHN D TAVES, Attornev WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that this application be granted and that the attached proposed c'a(m_be received and acted on in accordance with Sections 912 4 - 912.8 of the Government Code DATED November 9, 1979 ANDERSO11, AV S AND RE ER By: t J // / y laves, ttorney or Cl _'ant 7 -2- Y Andorson. av&s and Reover Allttneyratliaw IOACN arFAW MR n6 Q SZAlrt ONLY) 1 Sudel Sv9omore Surd,ne 1`080,1357 2 t 1305 West Foothill Soule.C, r UPIOnd Caldotn,a 91164 3!1 014)9859644 C1 F. Yrf cincucAmoxA Acm::n;orR, rnc(I 4 NOV 19 1979 511 Anortun for Claimant AM PM 7_78)9 )L7)11 p2)112) J)4)5)6 6� f 7II 8 CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY 9I 10 Claim of: ) Cas,l. No 11 LAURA JEAN SODERBERG, previously ) DECLARATION OF JOHN D TAVES known as LAURA JEAN MCALPINE, ) IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION 12 ) FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE 13 Claimant, ) CLAIM ON BEHALF OF CLAIMANT vs ) 14 ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD ) 15.OF CONTROL, BOARD OF SU- ERVISORS, ) i COUNTY OF SAO BERNARDINO CITY ) 16' CLERK OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ) CALIFORNIA, ) 17 ) Defendants ) 18 ) 19, I, JOHN D TAVES, declare: 20 That on or about October 11, 1979, I was retained by the 21 claimant to represent her to connection with the personal injuries 22 and damages she sustained in connection with an automobile accident 23 on January 9, 1979 24 That on October 25, 1979, I wrote to the Rancho Cucamonga 25 Sheriff's Department requesting a copy of the accident report and 26 this report received in my offire November B. 1919 27 That in reviewing the accident report, the traffic officer 28 noted that the stop sign for northbound traffic was intact but no sp G -1- O I sign was observed for the traffic going southbo,ind on ' no stop with the clainant was 2 Jasper Street The vehicle which collide.. 3 travelling o,. Jasper 4 That immediately upon reviewing the traffic accident 5 I prepared the governmental claim and this application. report, 6 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foreenina is 7 tree and correct 81 Executed on November 9 1979, in the City of Upland, d County of San Bernardino. State of California ANDERS M, T j7ES AND R�EgVER 101 .lc ✓. - By' 11 pp ayes, ttorney ice 12 Clpimant 13 ' 14 IS 16 17I 18 19 Pnl 2111 221 2311 241 21 26. I 27I ® _2_ A 28I Tani ••QYO renrr,uw�n II 7- ,n., mrnu�i.e I4II V.�•e 11 21 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15, 1 Anderson, caves and Reever Altolneytallow scaler Svcomo,e Buua.na P060.1357 13,5 W Ott Foothill Boulevard Uciand Coulo,n,o9nae (!14)965 9643 Attorneys for Claimant 111MCe OCLOw "A nUMO elAUP ONLY) 011YIOF'K „r ::I•Alu, "90-N A AMM -Wsra, IICN !JCv 13 1979 819(91U)lYll)213)4)Si6 CLAIM AGA'NST A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY Claim of: LAURA JEAN SODERBERG, previously known as LAURA JEAN MCALPINE. Claimant, vs STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF CONTROL; BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY CLERK OF RANC110 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, Defendants. Case No DECLARATION OC CLAIMANT FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM 19I I, LAURA JEAN SODERBERG. previously known as LAURA JEAN 20II hci%.T IN.., declare: 21 That I was involved in an automobile accident on January 9, 22 1979, which said accident occurred at the intersection of Jasper 23 Street and 19th Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, 24 That prior to and since the date of the accident I had 25 travelled on 19th Street through that same intersection on many 26 occasions That I was always under the impression that 19th Street 27 is a through- street and highway and that the north and southbound 28 traffic on Jasper Street was controlledby a stop sign • ap ii -1- u A • 1 2 3 d 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13� • 14 15 16 17 18 19� 20 21 22 23 24 25I 26I 27 28 ANOLRMII. TAY" • 11tr'U A np4AII AI Yw 1OI/OII,t{AOI ,I II M �.IOO,YILL IN0. IVT1 Oruw. �I That until the signing of this Declaration. I was not aware that the stop sign for the southbound traffic on Jasper Street was missing I never requested or viewed a traffic report prior to this time The other party was represented by an incuran company who has been in contact with me and has indicated that it was insured's fault for the accident and I never thought other- wise. I was also convinced that the accident was solely the responsihility of the other driver If was not until just immediately prior to my signing this Declaration was 1 aware that there was a possibility that a public entity might be involved I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed this V% day of November, 1979, in the City of Upland, County of San Bernardino, State of California. 11'r 1 &4?a �1�6,/ /e.�e,� LAT1k�JEAf7� ERM u prey ous y known as LAURA JEAN McALPINE, Claimant -2- 1V[ kit ICATIUN — 4A :UIl (C C P I 1 SJATI OF ((III URNIA (OUNTV OF • 2 3 4 w,A•,N1n mr „rNu„w,NprvNinF /Amt •ead,Ar lNr[oaL 5 6 ,N (... ,err•w,f+,. ,+ma ro/. mi0, b„ bm., rnuvr e., (wa.lNp nnprm nrAwr rum.MMw,Ae. 7 ,rNN ,!w w, .1. 1. Mr/ ro,, ,a 14..Ie iw„rm / Mun a r. A, 1M e 9 10 nnNN m ,f, ,1 1 CIf ✓OnM 11 / hr n ron v+„ NM•rvu ,b ,M JN Lwa , +,d e n 1 12 13 VserNr 14 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 11013s, 2015 J C C PI 15 STATE OF CAI IIORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 16 ��'hiNn„IrN.wwr,lNrn1J /aer. rAr aLfa /nLArrc,Jr:nro,N,JNrrJ is 4r M411, nNr/Nxux wt hoist, 19 P 0 Box 1357 1365 IJ Foothill Blvd , Ste 1, Upland CA 9171 18 0. November 1979/v_ /n•.N ,Ar arA„ Claim for Personal In r Sect on o c e o crnment Code APplicat on or Leave to Presf 19 L[ Claim R h 1 f f rl OP., 1 J f T h n T in Support of Application for Leave to Present Claim on Behalf of 20 ' ClAtaa1t t a ldq_ Dec. of C. (ment on the INTERESTED PART=S w w,Jw•w AI Nn •r n.r fup� r(rrn /,Ma,Nn, ,r,INnnA.Je nN rwmd rArmew/JlTAw•v.f a de ['wrNSnaF w,a 2i ,1 Unland. California ddn„N - 22 State Board of Contrnl San Bernardino County 926 "J” Street, Ste 300 Board of Supervisors 23 Sacramento CA 95814 175 Weat 5th Street San Bernardino, CA 92415 24 Ns Beverly Authelet 25 Deputy City Clerk Rancho Cucamonga 26 P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 27 E,reNN.+_11membr;r,- _ 14.29.1 Upland- Ls✓ 28 1 On4n ,.A•. 1.ylr� .J I'rn•� ,b 1Ar rmnM,A u 1..r ro 1Nnn SyhaNr )Z SONDRA T PEEK rn PY m ■.. WMr. Ale,. 9Y. etw-e., M.Neeertoe am'. 0.1, vv■ ■ •• DCATION FOR ALCOHOt1C REVERADI EICINS(S) I. PE(S) Of IICENSE(3) FILE NO. HE NO. To. Department of Alcoholic Smerage control 17130 Street .•�st 0,,_,L. ^J ?ii0 $acramanlO, Calif 93814 Oer•crcm •e usc•..e., The urdws.ved hereby applies for f,eemes dem,bd as fa0o.1, ^hjh, G•.iT.Z'LL - .iI:,G : LtG : GEOGRAPHIGl �,S CODE Date Issued Temp. Permit 7. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) :.•eCle :Z' C. 4 robcrG J. Applied under Se tl"40 A O Effective Dma1 t iW0 3. TYPE($) OF TRANSACTIONS) ERecdn Date, RE; LIQ TYPE '::e 'Ort, $ 1.250 47 4 Name of Nsiress S. laco>en of Rutinns- Number and Strut . 1007`, ?oothill 31 rd. City vend r t teas zori'3 (LiMfan IIiwitticapr uC NO. / TOTAL. _ e.��... l..u. $ 19250 Q IF Premnes licensed, 1-7 City limit"? _7" n % Sho. Typ. Of Men 8. Mpd�p9 Addms (if difleram from 5)- Number and Sheet ?=A. R r Is.-) m 9 Has You era been comMd of o 61ony7 10. No,* you tier .lalatd any of the pre,idens of the Alcoholic nn nq le he1 * Control T Act or regulations of .he Department Per- m 11 E.piain a "YE$" ansrer to IN" 9 or 10 on on ogachment ..h,ch shall be deemed port of this eppricaflon. 17 Appltom egren (a) that airy menager employed In emwle rksmisd premises with �e alb„ qva°. _Yµ F ....d Asmee, and IA. Nn.a.r.l.,f u..l..a.1 17. Sfar.omref0 of Licensee(,) 18. license Number(,) 19. locanoq �� Nunber and Stretl 9y and Lp Ceda 1•�3, v Ceuny r iz0 _rz Lr _1 COO.. " _l:• .e .. T.CilO V�Cr ou ♦�../ r C �Qo Nof Mile Hereto This Line; For Departments sister Only d, Q Recorded notice, l3 ❑ Fiduciarypopsm 3 10 —i1 -7) Q ._ __ COPIES MAILED m. u Ej R v .neuh Fee of 63C•ooPad at _u'! .,Ct^1:7`tE1C0 Office en 10 31 1 % Recetpi Na. --_ ANC V i ,..,.. .u, ♦... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NIMORANDUH • Date: November U. 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer . Subject: CDNSENT CALENDAR - RELEACE OF BOND Tract 9596 - Reims! Bond Located on the rant aide of Carnelian Street, north of Banyan Street Owner: Cary Miller 23625 E. Maple Spring Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 Performance Bond (Landscaping) $18,150.00 NOTE: The landscaping requirement ban been met per conditions. • Tract 9430 - Release Bond ' Located on the Northwest corner of Haven and Nilson Avewee Ower: H.L. Sievers and Sons, Ine. 6481 Oraogethorpe Avenue, Suite 8 Buena Park, California 90629 Performance Bond (hater) $45,000.00 NOTE: The voter system vas approved by the Cucamnyp County Mater District on November 7, 1979. 11 ANLWEASEN ENCIN4CRINC CQ t• 'NS4•••N •/ • f•lo' tf•/ Y •U•w /•r W t. VIII •( (1,6.11.1 U aw W N SIYa .� 1N1.: .fr/ N.II. ••I ••N • W YIa• •( b•NN• UI a • I. f• I.CI[ a1 IfM • ••11 I IU� MI�M NUy L 1 \M fIN • C fNN1f N \•t 11 afY u \M UuYI�•JY N II. Nf• 1•\ IIY•q• IN• •W[v1Y Ila+a. �l. Wl,•••• • f•W • .. Ia 1. • Nlt•a•• 1•'1.1 aU• W \IAN f 4 Il N• y�• r/.Mf /NNMf Iu •Y'f YWi Iltl�' \IN f. N Y+• f' uMCal•'•I a \'YIM•11 •1 il•• •111 b IUN • W NILV N tY M•Il ful•IN f iaN\ •.• 1' r. f f I fd N fw\ [I•I/•I'• IUIf N\ 1. f [ - t aN • C•uU FY R'-n• YMVN f• _ � I( -Ui IIUtY'•M • NNN Mal Ybj1 \• 1[. 4aN r•NI \• Ij X1111 N f •0w••Lyn• •wl•t f [IN.. M IN •M•I•a NU•ILI�I•••�✓ a 1 Y i YI Jf If f �y: SCA f A100' OtrCN6EN 1916 mm f rFACr NQ 6DA/ u6 1.01 .V..19 ;, i1'�I x l !r I +•� I° I ff I fr l a I fJ I L 1 w Y •nc u4N•4F/I , P.F n t•.r N //4 ✓O/ A )4lf L t EifJ/ Fist I i) W.U.. 1• tip `V�. '�__Nl•V• �i; L � / )�• ,I* C. ISf: All (nN •• d ;J )O i�.S !J h,• rl yr INn 5 —:.,. ' -- 3 +:. i I r! ��•\ I i/11 �f„T' lJu �ir• q 3 � 4 9 � � ' �n 1• ,�'i ;• .I,n.cr1 -�.�� ��I Ayi 7� in'� �1 .h •.v. /n 1 /lr'• p S+: �, " :i,ir 1, Si :F.: I ., 1•..� t�tl •�;° i YYI'�' .rrl.. 1 ;In _� _ �. r I :. ,/' •ffl,),N 11 I. •) i L °•5 ~��shp•:Nq rr )YNa/ It Lt MI Y I f ' (flta 1 •1 I IF• r � �rinf� (. I • Itrn 1• tip `V�. '�__Nl•V• �i; L � / )�• ,I* C. ISf: All (nN •• d ;J )O i�.S !J h,• rl yr INn 5 —:.,. ' -- 3 +:. i I r! ��•\ I i/11 �f„T' lJu �ir• q 3 � 4 9 � � ' �n 1• ,�'i ;• .I,n.cr1 -�.�� ��I Ayi 7� in'� �1 .h •.v. /n 1 /lr'• p S+: �, " :i,ir 1, Si :F.: I ., 1•..� t�tl •�;° i YYI'�' .rrl.. 1 ;In _� _ �. r I :. ,/' •ffl,),N 11 I. •) i L °•5 ~��shp•:Nq rr )YNa/ It N S� N i � a rn 3 z1 FF Z, C—) 1- n l� a S N ( it •unu•a.,y°wewx)a•.tar a.u:+.sw Y — a i�Y`�.yT'�'�•r,�r,•,nrynv i Wit...•.... � .(7fj"L,:,s.• r7 .i c y � �,• Fi li j a i (C�� � la f2 •t i '� s• a °itil., &-I i t :,Q� N S ' L31 "••• I 1II2— fJS Y a�7 ^ 5 S 1 ,.... u• 1vawG :«. 41 s t Eye I' � a j �, mw' wn•. ramu 1 ��F °s f y � �,• Fi li j a i (C�� � la f2 •t i '� s• a °itil., &-I i t :,Q� N •= Ya R O " t, t ^ :«. 41 s Eye � °s f rs �J•L • is i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • 1IE40RANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Llo.id Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Auard of Landscape Maintenance Contract As previously authorized the Engineering Division on November 01, 1979 advertised to receive bids for the Landscape Maintenance of City Parkways. Bids were received on this contract November 15, 1979. The only bidder was The Southern California Landscape Management Company with a total bid of $36,276.54 for an 18 month period. Attached for Council review i.s the bid summary and a location summary sheet of the parkways to be maintained Contract and bid specification are available for review to anyone who is interested. The monthly square footage bid was 10.0114 or $1,758.30 per month. Initial cleanup was bid at $4,627.11 Total funds required for the X • remainder of the year are $15,176.91. This is approximately one -half of the engineering estimate. • The bidder has done significant work for other agencies (see attached references). Based on qualification and the reasonableness of the bid Staff makes the following recommendation: RECOIMENOATION: It is recommended that the Council approve and award the Landscape Maintenance Contract to Southern California Landscape Maintenance Company and authorize execution of the contract agreements Respectfully submitted, ,L1 Hubbs J L14 Engineer LH :cd Attachcr-nt SCHEDULE I (PROJECT LOCATIONS) 154,737 LOCATION APPROX. AF.E11 NO. SIDE STREET MANE LIMITS SO FEET 1 H Carnelian Ptm Drainage Channel North to 8111sido 26,532 2 E Carnalian From Brilliant Zane North to aanym 26,900 3 E Sapphire From Highland North to Orango 2,192 4 E Hermosa From Pacific R.R. to 100' North of 5,933 Victoria 5 E Harmosa From 360' South to 117' North of 2,385 Banyon 6 E Haven From Victoria to 450' north of 19th 21,204 7 N Haven From 480' Scuth of Victoria North to 19,790 19th (includes returns at Victoria) 8 S 19th From 100' vest of Cartilla to 100' 10,668 East of Valinda 9 N 19th From Haven East to Palm S,802 10 S Banyon From 650' Nest of to Boryl 4,5:11 11 N Victoria From Haven to 700' East 4,200 12 S 7th From Hallman East to Nals�hita 5 384 13 N 6th From 165' Nest of Layton to 130' 6,952 Nast of Archibald 14 E Hellman From 625' South of to 7th 3,125 15 E Turner From 110' South to 3,.L' Ncrtn cf 2,870 Palo Alto 16 N Biker From 140' South of Nair, NL,th t, ,,. to, 2,749 154,737 SCHEDULE 1I (PROPOSED ADDITIONS)* NO. 14CATION SIDE STREET NAME LDIITS APPROX. AREA FT. 1 W Archibald From 300' South to 100' North of Hiddaa 1,593 Farm Road 2 W Haven From Wilson to 600' North 11,997 3 N Wilson From Mayberry East to Haven 10,998 4 N 19th From 100' Slut of Catilla East to 7,992 Raven 5 E Mayberry From Poplar to 400' North 3,996 6 W Haven From 19th to 800' North 48,400 Is I *Other areas not determinable at this time may be added during the term of the, contract. -25- CONTRACT PROPOSAL • For the City of Rancho Cucamonga, protect entitled -Citywide Parkwuy and Irrigation Maintenance", contractor shall furnish landr =ape and irrigation maintenance. The undersigned bidder further declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that he has examined the special provisions and specifications, and read the accompanying instructions to bidders, and hereby proposes and agrees, if this proposal is accepted, to furnish all arterials and do all the work required to c late the said work in accordance with the Spacial Provisions and Specifications, in the ties and mannar therein prescribed for the lump sum and unit cost •sounts sot Z-rth in the schedule on the following Iroposal. Thirty' -six thousnnl t'ro huntrot '45, ?71.91, Totals .. . -..,.. "1 "1111 dollars $ •words Figures Date, 15 '7OV9rlher 1971 Bidders SCL1 CID., Inc Dyn Rona11 ^. 4arig,n mrostlant BID OPENING DATE: NCJFJtaER 15, 1979 :::i I •3 • -S- as DESCRIPTION P8 %. ANT. UNIT MONTHLY CONTRACT OMIT COST AMOUNT AMOUNT' l clean up and Ism r, aver' ation of parkways 134 137 s.f, 11.13 Spa :4977.11 tract specifications -M of contract) F-M uous parkway ance as per cron- 156.217 S.F. x•1'1 ' 31 94aa pecifications '1751.3 ing 15 ninths of ct) Thirty' -six thousnnl t'ro huntrot '45, ?71.91, Totals .. . -..,.. "1 "1111 dollars $ •words Figures Date, 15 '7OV9rlher 1971 Bidders SCL1 CID., Inc Dyn Rona11 ^. 4arig,n mrostlant BID OPENING DATE: NCJFJtaER 15, 1979 :::i I •3 • -S- as • 0 SUPPLEMENT EXTRA WORK SCHEIULEt ITEM DESCRIPTION HOURLY LABOR COST INCLUDING OVERHEAD UNIT LABOR COST INCLUDING OVERHEAD A Irrigation Repair L Installation e Irrigation Installer -- B Controller Repair C Installation :12.25 0. Fiall Sullrvisor c Plant 15 Gal Tree a Stake Trae Trinn3r $28.25 - D Plant S Cal Shrub 8.30 E Plant 1 Gal Shrub 4. ?5 P Plant 1 Plat Groundcover 10.1)0 HOURLY LABOR RATE, (List all applicable positions and/or classifications) ITEM CLASSIPICATION HOURLY RATE NOT INCLUDING OVERHEAD A Ganoral Laborer i5• ?� e Irrigation Installer 6.79 C Licensed Chemical Appligator 8.75 0. Fiall Sullrvisor 9. 15 E. Trae Trinn3r 8.75 13. ?qui'3it 003ritar 8.73 Date, 15 lo- ii'17er 1171 BID OPENING DATE: NOVEMBER I.S. 1979 Bidders SCL I C0., In: L By, Preaiient nl The undomilned also agrees as follows, FIRST: Within S days from the date of the Notice of Contract, to execute the contract. SECDND, To begin Work on December 3, 1979 after execution of the contract and to prosecuto said work in such a manner m to campleta the initial clean up and restoration within one month followed by eighteen months of continuous maintenance. Accompanying this pivposal is cash, a emhior's check or a certified check or bidder's bond for Throo- thousa•il six hunIM 3 t"entv-nkaylble to the City which is to be forfeited, as liquidated damages, if, In the event that this proporal is accepted, the unders•gned r.211 fail to execute the contract and furnish satisfactory bonds under the conditions ari + within the time apeci• led in this proposal., otherwise said cash, cashier's check, certified ebeck, or bidder's bond Is to be returned to the under- signed. Date 4z . Signature of DSdder2�W, —a-4 1 By 10911:1 C. 4anson r Address of Bidder 1'13 "C" St, La Verna, 1•1 9173'1 + None and Address of Members of the Pi:u Ron-l' C. Hanson, 719 Lona 'Vista, eonan a, ra 91713 I eil,r Janson, 715 Lona Vint,, eonona, C1 97717 } If a Corporation s Signature of Bidder�L BY lonill C / Hanson 1 Title Prnsi•lant x :, ainess adrae' 1711 "C" St, Ll Verna 11710 rxlt`lrnii Incorporated under the Laws of the State of President lonal9 'IansOn Secretary ( p Treasurer 1 7•' 3 d1115 State License Number \\, —7— (X 0 r CONIRACIOR'S LICENSE Contractor's License No. (C 27) 370 909 Issued on 'larch 12 , 19" , pas not been revoked. Signed this 1Rth day of novomCsr , Iy 79 SCLI co., Inc Noes of the Contractor or Contracting Pins 1443 ":" 3traet, La Verno, CA 91750 Address BY Ronald C. Hanson Presi?owt I Illlllllil \� ",,,• 5 BID GUABAYM FORH 0 L o- S N 0 [D Ln � m 1 i y j T i J O O A O I •� 11 r• II S '•' O .A." S ^.l t M., Inc • *Z--R %+ v Ronall ^. 4ans',n Bidder ,' Accompanying this proposal in cash, cashier's check or a certified check payable to the order of the City of Ranco Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino. State of California for Thr30- Tt1OUsmnd six hundred ana tmanty -oignt dollars. ($ �j�B•��). This cash or the proceeds of this check shall become the P1 m unP ropcaal shall be accepted by aZ • . r t) N • Q« derelgDed shall tail to execute LO a V.- • o U 9 ° ga vithin .J w t Ca H ash or check is to be returned aU�y t of Z c, L o- S N 0 [D Ln � m 1 i y j T i J O O A O I •� 11 r• II S '•' O .A." S ^.l t M., Inc • *Z--R %+ v Ronall ^. 4ans',n Bidder ,' + ., M « o ,o•'• m unP • aZ • . M Y • Q« U .J w O Q O aU�y i) t L o- S N 0 [D Ln � m 1 i y j T i J O O A O I •� 11 r• II S '•' O .A." S ^.l t M., Inc • *Z--R %+ v Ronall ^. 4ans',n Bidder ,' + ., + , ,o•'• m unP BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF PINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ITECHNICAL ABILITY AND EXPERIELCE (The Bidder is required to state what work of a similar character to that included in the proposed contract he has successfully performed and give reference which will enable the City Council to judge his responsibility, experience, skill and rosiness training.) The undersigned submits herewith a statement of his fina..cial responsibility. The undersigned submits below a statement of the work of similar character to that included in the proposed contract which be has successfully performed. E<oar{anca Su' arv: Sae Attach91 U91t 5a,tn:e Sheat att%cho1 %J • �� e, lk-r)r- S1gne n 64 SCLI CO.. Inc: Excerience Sunrary 15 Novenbor 1170 C'Ly of 'lontclair :Aaintintnco of 52 nedian islands 4111 lanito Ave. which Includes turfgreso, cobble - 'IOnt:lalr, CA 91753 atone and irrigation systens. ATT14: 'lr Carl Sa�tell TEL : 714 -723 -3571 Rain 31rd Coroorate Maintenance of 10 facilities Services, Inc. which include non- olinted areas 7341 N. grand Ave. (n3ad abatenent), turf9ra53, Glendora, CA 9174) - bedding Plante, iround cover, ATTU: APR Pat Salter shrubs, trees and irrigtion TEL : 213 - 393 -93'11 systems. 'lont3 Vista County Maintenanca cf 15 facilities 'later District which include taro of non - 105"3 Central Ave Plantod areas (ward control) loot =lair, CA 91753 turfgr3.9s, ground Cover, shrubs, ATT'1: 'Ar Robert 'l. Thompson treo3 and irrigation systems. TEL: 714-324-1035 Sandal Inc. 4959 Edison Ave. Chino, :A ATT`1: 9r John Huh3r TEL : 714 -527 -7355 City of La Verne 3560 ^D° Street La Verne, CA 91750 ATT'l: 'Ar 1av l:alanbac'h TEL : 714-193-4571 Chine 3asin later Conservation Oi3tr!ct 4404 San 3srnArd!no Rd Uontcla!r, CA 91753 ATT'l: 7r Earnest ho113v TEL : 71^ -4?5- 1711 Maintenance of manufacturing facility which includes auto - natiC irritation sveten, turfgrass, iround cover, shrubs, trijs And no n- olant9d areas (need abiten3nt). :Aaintinince of eight median Islands which includes turfgrass, cobblestone and ground cover. •taintonance of a ground water recharge basin •:h!ch includes ground cover and autinit!c irritation systen3. 0 LA 4ounty 'ianihttion Facilitv nainn ianee 01 Ponona District Vallev 13elanition nitnt ' rhich 1915 lorltnin lill 11 incluie3 turf9rass, mound cover, 'lnittier, CA 39597 tress, shrubs, non- hlintsd areas, ATT'': ')r Dave "aniltsn and autonitic lrrination systsns. TEL : 71:- 5 ?1 -14 ?1 The :L' r'1., Inc., his nrgvilil lln1scaP3 services in the Ponona and - +.n iahr!al Vallly ar13a since 1)77. Our current • clients in9l'l1n city ant co'lnty ioverntents, eorsorttions. Snell hu91n3ss. teaetnont3 ant :oidoniniuns. The above list is r3hra93ntet!Vs of our clients. — 1� r( I 0 V v` -:h 1^^ an11- L¢. No. C27 37M Southern California Landscape Management COMPANY 1843CSTPrE7 LAVERNE CALIFOPPIIA91750 1714% 596 3263 9nloncn :h—': at 9'3o in ?f r,1t..c•.lnq �Z••Sn ;a ?n••rolt on:t•• Cna1 Tri 1,3 r-,- • ^•tnen I^ _ ?rn ?`L •- It tnr -•%.. .a,� •1••'•`11 - t't�tta •. '•C ^mot` ?' 'r 7.1 °� °t1 r: °11T.\ Ft: I %c•o %nt" '+%..:ln- '•f 7V Tr• ^'lc -•art r,,r, , °4'•r•`• ^ .o ^- Ter, ? >'• % 1 • -t °nt It /39-4 If o47 If r3 ..: r 1//// Sn ��oc4 �J9 r9 Gib •J III ?V7 f 11 • /t9 sit SY570 Arc tG //19 4/ 7S G /a> Yf60b i 7Grri 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i31E3BIL", HI AM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Enginee SUBJECT: Parkway Maintenance Funding and Budget Transfer The Council recently approved the implementation of a parkway maintenance program developed through contract with Roy Jorgensen and Associates. As a part of the implementation of this program it is required that the City budget be adjusted to reflect the new program and to complete the transfer of funds fron the Community Services Budget to the Engineering Division Budget An additinndl allocation from reserve funds will also be required to complete $ nding of the program. RECOHIENDATION: It is recommended that the Council take the following action: • TRANSFER $74,520 from the Salaries and Equipment from the Community Services Budget to the Engineering Budget. ENGINEERING FUND OISTRIdUTION Salarie, $19,697 Services and Supplies 34,823 Capital Outlay 20,000 TOTAL: —S� The attached Memorandum further details the funds distribution. 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOhCA • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 e" TO: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer r t FROM: Monte Pmscher, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM COK14UNITY .SERVICES TO CCK40NITY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING $79,380 will he transferred from the following Camunity Services budgeted iteea: ( (Includes $0,860 Approved to be transferred by Council, 9/5/79) $17,373 from Wages Maintenance Supervisor 22,194 from Wages Maintenance Worker 1I 38,839 from Wages Haintenance Worker I 974 from Equipment i $79,380 Total ($74,520 to be transferred at this time.) y These funds will be distributed as follows: Salaries: Nalntonance Supervisor $12,180 Maintenance Wori.er I 7,517 q Subtotal $19,697 $19,697 F Equipment (Capital Outlay) 20,000 20,000 J 7 a Contracts (Services and supplies) Consultant (already completed) 4,860 3 e Chemical Woad Control (County) 10,000 4 �i Parkway muintenanco 24,827 _ Subtotal $39,683 39,683 Total $79,380 • Does tot Include 1980 -81 M -2- Breakdown of Expelaituros - 1979 -80 Salaries Maintenance Supervisor - 6 moths Step $ 8,472 25 months Step B 3,708 Maintenance Worker I - 6 conchs Step A 5,568 2 months Step B Subtotal $19,697 $19,697 *Equipment office furniture (Desk, their, tiles, $ 1,500 calculator, etc.) 4ei clo (3/4 Ton H D. w/buarar, rack, tool 13,500 crib, spare tire, safety lights) nand tools and supplies (shovels, brocas, tree 5,000 stake!. ties, irr. parts, pad locks, sign parts, hosts, Hyd wrench and adaptor, post driver, hand tools) Subtotal $20,000 $20,000 Contracts Parkway Study (R.J.A. Consultants - already completed) Chemical Weed Control, Parkways i Shoulders (County) Parkway Maintenance (154,237 sq ft at 0014 - 1,758 30 per to ) To be added (36,576 aq. ft at .0114 416 97 per w Initial Restoration Updating, taeft, collision, etc. subtotal *Same of those items have already been pu a Sel- 4,860 10,000 10,549,80 2,000 4,627.11 7.646. no 39,683 39"683 Total 79,380 Punds Available 79.780 CJ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: November 21, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Subject: BOND - DIRECTOR REVIEW 110 79 -39 The attached bonds have been submitted for approval by Charlie Coggin of Vitro Strand Technologies, Inc. The bonds are being used to comply with the Engineering condition of street iaprovement Engineering requires tastallattne prior to issuance of a building permit or appro- prface o When bonds are submitted, the street improvements annt be In and approved prior to final occupancy. The attached bonds are sufficient in nature to be used as security in place of installation Note that according to the conditions of approval the developer was allowed to make the street improvements in front of his • parcel in two phases; Phase 1 within one year and Phase II within two years. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution directing the Mayor and City Clerk to accept and sign the improvement agreement on behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, uQY6 B. HUBBS City Engineer LBII:JLM :nm Attachment J 0 I i CITY OF RANCHO CDCANONCA IMPROVENEUr AGREMENr (Planning Cavnlsslon Resolution No 81701! ALL NEh by TIIESE PRESEKS: That thin agreement is made and entered into, is conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Renula- tions of the City o. Ran6o Cacamongn, Statr of Cal lfornia, a municipal cor- poration, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and as NITNESSEItI: TILT. RMEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of, Director Review No. 79 -39 - Phase I in accordance with the provisions of the report of the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located 8975 Rochester Avenue; and, MIEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and h3tEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval; NON, 7VEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1 The developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all _ improvements described on page 3 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof 2. The term of this agreement shall be 12 mom h% , commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided 3 The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi- sions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warrantee by substantial changes therein 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provi- sions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover it= said Developer and /cr his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. S Encroachment permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any .,urk within the public right of way, and the developer shall conduct such work In full compliance with the regulations contalntnl therein Non-compliance may result In stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided. 6 Public right of way improvement work conformance with approved improvement and Standard Drawings and any special shall Include any transitions and /or for drainage or public safety RCE12A 34 required shall be constructed In plan%, Standard Specifications, amendments thereto Coastruction other incidental work deemed necessary IMPCOVIMI"T AOREEI117Nt 7 L'.•rk .1,1110 within rN xl lnl; r.tr•el, .hall 1..• dlllf.'n111 1'ttr•aicd to Colville- tile Cilc +hill) hive Lilt- rlcltt to u.mpb it- in% .tnd all work [native .• cent of unlu•.ttlfe.l dvl.le In unal.iel ten. .In.$ to n•u.vtr all last .1 4! elpen.c incurred Irem the Ueveloper and /ur Ilia cuntr -Ictor by any lawful .Calls 8 the I\•.choper •.it 111 'Ie n•xpoina lh L• fml Iep It, t wt-tot , re l neat foil., or re- nuv.tl of anv Colnponcnt of env Irllgltion wlive �vatem lu tent l Let with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Lnglneer and the "nor of the water system- 9 lilt, Itevelo:wr shill be reapen+tblc for rei+.v 1.l of all looia• rock and other dobrl, from the pnbllc right of way resulting from work done on the adja- cent property or within said right of way In the he. eloper +hail plant .tnd Imintain parkway trees as directed by the C,mmnnity Development Director 11 The Improvement security to be faroi.hed by 1.110 neveloppr to guarantee completion of the terms or this agreement shall he 90lolert to the approval of the City Atteonet The print$poll Lmenot of said improvement security shall be not less than the amunt shown below! IfIr ROVEIIENT SECURITY SIIIRILTTED: Faithful Performance Bond TYPE SURETY /AGENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT $4,000 00 Material and Libor Bond $4,000 00 Ili 171TNFSS HEREOF, the partics heron have cmiscd these preacnta to he duly cvcutrd and acknowledged with aU formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: DEVELOPER BY: �'' / l � DATE: .vtV 6 / I ) 7 DY 1 DATEBy.. MITNLSS t 7 ,t' .7' I DATE: CITY OF MNCRO CUCMIONGA, C&IFGRNIA BY: ATTEST: DATE: RCE12B a municipal corporation 33 MAYOR LITY CLERIC P. • 9 • Is "Ili llr Rvall I'IR'•VIOgP\ n1c.u•rlTUlll s:n ,rm ran•nn 1 1 rr S('DI NI'I I (All„b In "hls,n,IOr•v I,yq "I DATE: October 8, 197) rFrdllT Nn ;lRll'U rFO BY J L Martin File Reference OR 079 -39 - phase [ qty Drawing No n NOTE: floes not In, lade rorrent fee for writ loj: prnnit or pavrnent replace. mcnt dern.1ts CONSTRUCTION COST ESTINATE TTF-M I LAUF RTI:PT OF WAY (NAUTITY wit [,I , UNIT l:0':T C 3 Amnutrr III N"1'. \LS lIISC A f. PAYr.MENT •` ' U''ul ILRn A rrrn.R 1,560 60 20 1 „ti• �.1. 1 1 1.i. .8Q 4 50 200.00 1 248.00 180.00 ( Ro,� , l'Tll R /srANDRI I fA . till IiAI . I ULI I APPROALMS - I 2.10 630.00 (RI SHED AGCREGATF. SASE p• r EI• I !1:1175 I 2. S A° RLDNOOD HEADER P. �IRLFT SIGNS I\ R. C. 11. I i' CATCH BASIN I'A OUTLET STRUCTURE F.A. OVERLAY 23 T.TAINTNG NAI. S I I F,i 01'1(0dl 15 L.F. L. \GUSCArE 6 IRR IGATIUN L.S. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST _ 3,060.80 ingrFUION ii.YG ITEM IIAN IT1 UNIT "NIT '1S C I CONSTRUrTION INSPF,Cri09 - of Consl rued,. ('Sat Estimate 1'A VI II rG ,1— Ili' Tlt lll(;(l PI RIL\NENr rAVtllrxr RI rLAri gEVr L.S. F STORE N. \11 VI AL IN RI(.11T- III -IfA\ fA I TOIAI. INSPLCT.01: iris If rmll'At TIDY TIST Fr LS III 111' flllrflll(.ENLIFS IV DESIGN rD.- (102 of Tolel Ulna lost ritti ve) Faithfol rrrf..rr,Ive Sand . g T'1TAL 4,000.00 ftn crlal and I d,ur Dnnd 54,000.00 Miloteoanrr, nrnd . $ 1-1011 flonumint tag f4•r(.slt . $ RCE22E 3 S 154.00 .S $ 3G6. 00 S -- 306.00 5 3.6� 3OND NO. 005184 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of this City of Rancho Curamongo, Sta ^s of California, and Vitro Strand Tethnolo tes. Inc (hereinafter designated us �ncipa_ avc cn[a[cd nto�an -- agreement whereby principal agrees to install easy complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 19_, and identified as project pirector Review rtes 79 -39 - Phase I 3e here by referred to an ma e a part hereo r and, WHEREAS, staid principal is required under the terms of said agreemenr to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and tijagj)L INSURANCE COMPANY as surety, are fie Yd and iirm y oust untCo the City o Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called "City "), in the penal sum of F ur thousand and n21100 . •aw Do ars 4 000.00 u money of the Un to States, of the payment o w ch sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, execu- tors and administrators, Jointly and severally, firmly by those presents The condition o° this obligation is such that if the above • bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi- tions and in provisions the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec- ified ' and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void= otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefcr, there shall be included costs and reasonable expanses and fees, including reasonable at- torne7's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec- ifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its SIAIE OF CALIFO&.IA COUNTY OF ORANGE On this 2nd das of _ NOVEMBER_ 19 79 before me pe..nally came MADELAINE _GENTRY to he knoun, oho being by me duly sunm, did depmc anti say- that he is Attomeyi:`. Fact of Surrtv Insurance Company of Crhfornia, the Corporation described in and uhich executed the foregoing instrument• that he knous the seal of said Corporation, that the seal affixed to said i minsint is such corporate seal, that it uas so affixed by authority ¢ranted to him in aeeor- dance with the By-Laws of the said Corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority rs't.,, s.s,� „s;,e,an s d t• (Notary Public) ,i�t n BOND NO. J05184 LABOR ANL RATERIALREN BOND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ranche Cucamonga, State of California, and Vitro Strand Technologi (hereinafter designated as pr f�ihave encrna ca into an acream ^nt whereby principal agrees to install and complete cer- tain d- signaled public improvements, which said agreement, dated ' 19 and identified as pro- ject Director Review Ro. 9-39 - Phase I is hereby referred to and made a part hereoft and, WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the wo.k, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cur-a- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are hele firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, materiul- man and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Cade of Civil Procedure in the sum of Four thousand and no /100 • Dollars $ 4.000.00 _ � ,for mater als furnished or labor t.ereonof any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay it addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the judgment therein rendered It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, ana corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Sec�icn 3082) of Part 4 of Division i ut tine Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in ST A I E OF CALIFOJUJ!A COUYTY OF ORANGE ) On deli 2nd duy of - NOYEMBER - _ _ _ , 19-73_ _, before me prrsonallycame _ m,1DELAtt1 ^. GENTRY to be known ulto bring by me duly morn, did depasr and say drat he is Attornry• -in -Fact of Surm% In .,arse Company of California, the Cogsotatron derrnbcd in and uhich executed the foregoing instrument, that he knows the seal of said Corporation, that the seal affixed to said inswummrit is such corporate seal, that it gas so affixed by authority granted to him in aceor. tLrnee with the B) -Lives of tine said Corporation, and that hr signed his came thereto by like authority. nr. ,.+s..,r.,�.,^, - +,• i. ( (Notary Public) 5=41 Jurehf .Qnsurance Company of Catilornia "I)Iegt+ar+al.a 3ene sw.v 11031E OFFICE IN Lt IIABRA. CALIFORNIA Rea laf0 I^ tub.., c.Drow $0e51 CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY ,Jl77// now .1/'.A. 6y 16..e prvo."fer That S.rly lmursnee Company of C Ilfwnit . C.11(cmA Cormeanen. My Ina Its principal Office In Me City of LA Habra. County of Oran, state of Callte,ma pnnue,t to IM following B)'•LAv which wen Mopted by the Directors of the sold Carapace on the pill day of April IDS$ .M nre sow In effect ln•wll 'Article IV. Section T(b). The President shatl have power AM autharlly to splinter Altrmga IwF+cr am aulboeloe Iblm to execute on behalf of the Company bends and undeRaMna., rsmanlm nee a. mnlmrla of IlWrmm(y, and either MIL tills oblgaluy In Me return thereof AM he may At any unit In his judgment re 2. ce any m. Indemnity. aM make en suthorly green to than" H.a made mtuutulM .M appolntM eM by New Drswnta awe melee mluutute aM IDnninl Madelalne Ce itrY of La Habra. California Its true aid IAwful agent and anormy -In fact to make execute seal eM delver for and in Ira behalf a In fly nM as 14 act tM deed an a: lM folleuing classes of documents. to wit IMemnny Surety end UMrbakinp that may er Arnred by rnntlArl I, may be tams In any -rums or P'lleding In $ry mutt of b1- nr ryuny policies mdrmmnme employee. 491Inat loss or damage routed by the mieconduct of lnnr emnlnrres nL V.al ninety .M (Welly 1b nis THE AL711ORTTV nr THM pn%vrn eap %TTnRNVY lA I iMtTPn TO nvP nry USED r1my 7110-ISASD AND NO 1100 (Alw000 M• OOI AARS MR ANT SINGLE BOND THIS POIVER OF ASTOHNEY IS VALID ONLY F(IR A BOND Of, VNr'MTAK. INO EXECUTED PRIOR TO DECEMBER II I979 And the esrtullun of such bems nr uMeTtaklnae In pueswnre of Ine,e pee.enr rM ;l be .+ bi Mlnp ipnn mid Cmnrry As fully .net amply to .11 letter, .M purprerr w If Me) bad btyn .IUI, evrnM .net arknn .lydpr.l er Me ',G, "ly elected officers of the Company at Ito olflce m )A Cletus. C111felrua In Ih(v tam props, demon. IN tt•ITN"'s WIR- 11F.OF Stirrer lemrrnr. Campser of Callfmmu aA mewl in... r nL Ie to .�pnM by Ir1yb M(Mnied officer. end lt, mlponln sent lobe hrnonln Vfenl Ml. �I)eh doe of S`epte ec it 79 81;11ETY INSUR11ANfT. CO}IPAN7 Or CAUFORNEA By gobs F Merrill Praldent STATE CP CALIFORNIA se COUNTY OFtORAnaE September 79 On in,. nday rtl AD 19 before Ch* nlMrnbf . Nntay ^ Ihnr nt the rlata of C.Iftmil, mend fm fee 'minty of Orsne' 11-11 rnmmlmmnnl AM m1114hed rare Inim P }Iers.11 Pn,hMnt M SOn "% 1\e4-11.tACP. CDIIPANI nV t I) It nnAl.t. In re. "ren":l. aMw I, m be the mhl nluai nml nnI ✓r described In, area sM Im,"ted tie pttrMlnt, mat nnn.nl amt he nrkmmlMerd tar mty1-lmn of Ins mine acd Lv -ng by me dnlY .m,A deposed nM mid diet he Is the oll¢rr of th• said ComMeyy afnrr.arl. aM that rrlr mat nffnM In IM prrCMing lm,u• meet Is the Cnrperste $ #AI of mid Compmy aM the a•td Corpnrnle Feet nM m• nonnurn 1. ,tour were I,,I afOxM I'M nibs,rbM to Inn mid Instrument III in' a"M+nq AM direclnn It the raid (•n IMrnhnn eM (Rol Ar Kle lV SreDen Tlem of the BY-La., v( mid Company I hall In m the prtyMln, trot rinl..I . no, In force IN TESTI}IONy II HEREOF 16.r heir ma it my hand, and affixed m) OfOOal Get It the City of LA H.bt& the day and year tint sense u -mDen Car yn 1. H1Eeae Notary PUale - c IJ 1, CE%UICATE 1 11 CA 90!31 1 the uMenlCnel "ItIti, inv I am lh, S.r,lvy of St P.E.TY INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA aM that lid turhr,l Parer r Atm,,r, trmvn• n ndr mete nml rfrrrl and b" It attn rrenhrvl met bitthremnm that Aftlele IV Ctyitnn '.o Dy 1.•wr n( mid 'm, ..... berth m mil Purer of dnnmr) err, min• m f 11 fine Inl elfeet IN TESTIMONY ' "iEREOF I h.ae hr,' ucIn nmar 'lvd n. name .M NlisM the rarpnratr reM at the Asia Comp.vy M,I KOVEM ©I:R .) 1979 laEAi.t .r*�w•a�ari- •mM! rs— rryw L] • CITY OF RANCHO CIMMO A • IHPROVMlENT AGREEMENT (Planning Cummisslon Resolution No KNOW ALL NEN RY THESE PRESENTS That this agreement is made and entered Late, in conformance with the proviglnas of the finnteipal Code and Regula- tlonq of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal cor- poration, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and to WITNESSETI: THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of, D(rectOr RPvI w fig 79-39 - Phas It in accordance with [h.. prey is tone of the report of the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at 8975 Rochester Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of the development; and WID:REAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are dectrad to be equivalent to prior coapietion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: I. the developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 3 hereof within _ 24 rtDnths from the date hereof The tern of this agr•ment shall be 24 months . ctmancing on N-o date of execution hereof by the City This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the torm stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided 3 The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provi- slons of thin agreement, In writing act less than four leeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time In consideration of such request, the City resomes the right to review the provisions hereof, Including eotstmetion standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require • adjustments thereto when warranted by substantial changes therein 6 If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause raid provi- sions to be ram Plcted by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or hip Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing S Encroachment pormltq shall he obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right of way, and the d.vrlorer shall conduct ouch work In full eonpl Lance with the regulations cuntain.d them in Non- eompllance may result In stopping of the work by the City, and as seasnent of the penalties provided. 6 Public right of lay lmprevanent work reglLLred sha 1 be constructed in conformance with approved tnprovc-mcnt planq, Standard Speelfieatienq, and Standard Drawings and any npecial amendments thereto Construction shalt include anv transitloni ant /or other inctdontal wort domed necessary for drainage or public .afet% RCE17A 3 so r I'U'RovulLaF AtaumiLOf Pape 2 w..,k .1 ...... wllbin calvt lnf: ctrcvtq %hall I.r dilil:u,tlr pnr:amd to comple- tLnl; the f llv %hall hn•r tl„• right W rnnp lrh• Inv tad all work in the .v,•„I of nup,vt if iod .L lay h1 anmp.Icl inn. .nol In ..•aorrr all vo "t •oid exp,'n %e incurred frm the Voroloper and /w, his rontroctor by any lawful wtcan4 B. Tlw• Ise,-I.-per ..h ill br revp,.nnlbtr hot rrl•I uam ol, relnral lrvl, or to. nn•al of ary eompno,at of nnv lrrigat loot viler %yalem Io roof l let with the regnlred work to the sotlsfaOtlun of the City Engineot and the Owner of the water ayntem. 9 the th-voloprr sh0I h,• ra•.pons lb4• tots, rcn.v.,l of all Io.we rack and other d.•1•1 I+ from tits pnl•lu rli,ht of any resulting from work done on the adJa. cent property or within said right of way ID Ile• hoveloprr shall plant and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Cemmwrtty nrvelopment Director. it P.v Improvement %ecurlty to be furniNhed by the nevelnper to guarantee completion of the terms of tills ngrccmrnt shalt he sublect to the approval ,.f the City Attamuy The principal amount of said improvement security %11311 be not less than the amount shown below: ittrROVVIINT SECURITY SUNIITTED: Faithful performance Bond TYPE SURL•TY/ACENT PRINCIPAL AMOUNT $ 6,000 00 Material and Labor Bond $ 6,000.00 I:1 wIr%(SS HEREOF, tl•v pantos hcroto have caused these presents to be duly r <rcet.•.I and acinowlydged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth Opposite weir signatures: ny 2 • ai- I DEVELOPER C DATE: /X:/ 6 BY: DATE: wI TIN LSS: DATE: / /-C-') CITY OF Won CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA a municipal corporation nY : ATTEST: DATE: RCE12B MAYOR CITY CLCRR 0 • • 11 CITY Or RAxwo CL'c tto':G.\ CDNISTRCCFION AND BOND ESTt!ATr F.NCROACILMIT PrrYIT FrE SCIIFIIIILF (Attach to "Inapcctor'n Copy ") DATE: October 8, 1979 PERMIT UO. File Reference DR 179 -39 - Phase 11 City Drawing No COMPUTED BY .1.1 . Martin NOTC: Does not Include current feu for writing Permit or pavement replace- ment deposits CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE ITDI InHANTITY UNIT uniT COS --r)tmT CIL \IN: REMIT OF WAY I c,f, t REMOVALS. MSC L.S. 5 A. C PAVEIIENT 7 nn S.F. tin 7-IR4 On A C BLRM 4n 1. I' CURD A GUTTER 210 L.F. 6.00 1,260.00 I ROSS CPTTCRMA'IOREL S.F. S E DLWAII, c , F . DRIVL AI•PRUALIILS - KRRI4KRKZAi 300 S F. 2.10 630.00 rRl'SIICD AGGREGATE BASE S,E. 9TR.FFI I G Ti F 2° �° RED•IOOD IIFAnER L. F STREET SIGNS EA, R.C.P. I F CATCH BASIN EA, OUTLET STRUCTURE EA, OVERLAY 630 S.F. .23 144.90 I RFTAT)IrNC WAILS BLOCRL'.\LLS L.F. L NDSL, PE d IRRIGATION L.S. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST 4-Z49 90 INSPELTION FEES ITEK QUANTT31_ 5 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION - of Construction C,�t Esttmte L.S. L.S. L.S. PAVF11F'1? CUTiR TRFN PCRMA':CNT PAy11FNT RF.PLMIRT" F L.F STORE MAT IAL T•1 TZMUT -OF-WAY r\ I TOTAL INSPECTION FEES II COUPACTION TEST FEES III IOZ CONTINGENCIES IV DESIGN FEES (IOZ of Tutal Construction Cost Cstt ,iate) Faithful Performince Bond $6,000.00 llatertal and Libor Bond $6,000 00 )Llintenance Bond . $ Cosh Monueenting Deposit S RCE22E A/ y, 3 237.45 474 9 0 TOTAL S b.698.10 BOND NO. 005185 FAITHFUL DERFORHANCL BOND 0 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and ri o Strand Technologies. Inc (hereinafter designated as pr Ile pa ) have en -cred into an agreement whereby principal agrees to Install and complete cer- tain designated public improvement:, which said agreement, dated 19 and identified as project .Ofrector Review Ho 79- --PT'a a rl — s herey refer a to an I made a part hero ; an , WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement. NOw, THEREFORE, we the principal and SURFTI' 7N5,�ph� OF CALIFORNIA , as surety, are held a�n�d�Ny rmly oun unto t s C ty o Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter celled "City "), in the penal sum of AlffnLnLk2iflan. money of t o On to Ste tes; = the Lars 6 000.00 aw u truly to be made, we bind ourselthe,Paymeheirs , wsuccessors, lexocu- tors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above • bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, condi- tions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein spec- ified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and affect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in succes fully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spec- ifications , accompanying the same shall _� ..-. in anywise affect its ,) SPATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OFORANGE On thts _ 2nd __ dal of NOVCNEER __ __,19 79 ,before me prrmnally Came MADEL�INE GENTRY _ to br kno%,n. t.ho being by me duly slsom. did depose and sav that hr is Attorney -in -Fact of 5nrets Insuranec Compans of Gvdotnin• the Corporation dmcribcd In and ahtch executed the forreninc: inurument that he knnws the seal of said Corporation that the sal affixed to said in.trumcnt is such eotpomte seal, that it was so affixed by authority granted to him in aeeor. d.mce a ith the BL Iaus of the said Corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority ' °;;' ?� •;; ` - 1 „ � ( \ronry Public)' f1f001 BOND NO. 005185 LABOR AND !IATERIALFIEN BOND IMEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Vitnt Strand Technolo tes Inc. (hereinafter designated as pr nc pa eve entere into an agreement whereby prirc Sped agrees to in a tall and complete cer- tain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated 19 and identified as pro- ject Director Reveiw o. -3 - ;tase ii— is hereby roxerre to an ma e a part hereof; and, WIIERFr1S, under the terms of said agreement, principal is re- quired before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and suffic ant payment bond with the City of Rancho Cuca- monga to secure the claims to which reference is made in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE. said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcontractors, laborers, material - man and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of Six thousnj.and n t Doll rs �gp0.00 or mater furnished or labor t Freon of any kind, o: for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay the came in an amount not exceeding the amount hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this bond will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable at- torney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enfo -cing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, .n.: to be taxed as costs and to he included Its the judament therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) at Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Cole, so as to give a right o` action to them or their assigns in ny suit brought upon this bona. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then this obligation shall become null and void, otherwise It shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, ex- tension cf time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the same shall in • JSIAM OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNT'OFORANGE ) On this 2nd dal of .NDVEFMR _._ 19- 79— before me pet sonally came FIADELAINE GENTRY_ _ to be known, %, Ito bring b) me did) assern. did depose an, %a% that he is Attomry -in -Fact of Surety Insurance Compan) of Calilomta. the Corporation ti- senbed in and %.high executed the I'mcgoinC imtrument, that he knows the seal of said Carper eon that the seal affixed to said innrumrnt is such corporate «al, that it uas so affixed by authority granted to him in accor. dance with the B) -L,sss of the said Corporation, and that he signed his name thereto by like authority. •::e•.a._n: -�- jl t (Notat) Public) swam � h Surely 9n.4urance Company 01 California -pi. f Fume area t.m. Fr.„ HOME OFFICE IN IA HABRA. CALIFORNIA Rea •1110 V 1[abn. CW tornla adJJl CERTIFIED COPY OF POWER OF ATTORNEY TT// Nv 2058 ...X... a�� rnrn 6y d.sar Pleasant" That aunty Insurance Comp.' of California. a California Corporation fur• tog Its principal Offt" In the Cry of La Habra County of Oyange Stab of CaliforniA purawint to the following Ry-tatwa which ware adapted by the Directors of the said Company on the eN day of April- 111!0 AM are ram, b effect. Ur•wlt: •Artlde IV Section TMI The President limit hall purely and authority to appoint Attorneys M-rAlL aim Aulhon" Mem to elicit. on behalf of the Company bonds and uMenahmga eecoanlunKA contracts rat iMemml) aM other wnl• 'us obligatory N the nature thereof. and he may at spy Unt A his authority given to them lndeminl Times" any such Appointees l rfrf N. Has made, constituted and appointed and by New poess does maye, constitute and Appoint Hadelaine Centry of La Ilabrar California Its true and bwful agent and albmry•IroUCt to make execute seat AM deliver for aM in Ike behalf a surety. And as Its act and dead. N of the following eWare of documents, to Ml Indemnity Surely spa Lnden4kina that may be desiMl by contract or may M given In any Action or prneeeding In any court of bu or eauny Polities mdriiimftdrg employers against low or damage "wed by the mWAMuet of them employerr Mirml surely and fidelity bends. THE AUTHORITY OF THIS POKER OF ATTORNEY IS 9.111rITO TO ONE HUN. USED FIFTY THOUSAND AND Holto1 — I135000000i DOLLARS Frig ANY SINGLE BOND nus POtIT.R OF ATTORNEY IS VALID ONLY FOR A BONG OR CNDFUTAK• 'No EAECI.Tnv PRIOR TO DECEsfarn 31, Here AM the eaeeutien of such hand, er undertakings In purew." of three pfewnls 0.11 he a MM•Ag ,N. said Cc.rpa,y as b ly aid amply, b all intenb and Necroses, a If lhq had been duly exerelM AM acYnn.ledLM by the lipilsily elected officers of Me Company at Its office In La Hate". California In NUr mom proper ptrwiu IN WITNESS %THEREOF Surety lnev..... Campa". of Cslifornb M. hawe•1 these f•reagru 041, signed by Its duly authorized officer. aim its corpomlr "It to b Account. nffixnl lM. ZU dray of DDep 711_79 RUJILTY INSURANEC COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA By _.. J.Y.. -3 c =..' �c •_ _i..4?rertr :[_ 7obnF Merrill President STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY o` ORANGE ea• 20tH Sill 79 On Nu day a( AD le Nearer, the ser-, Ire n N1nol public en the Stab At INSI-R h b AM for the r'OF (I Oconee 4.11 emmmi romll, le o n to epee 44in i 3lfrnli IYeadml ib d M. "i .U, eveout•el CO11pdV OF < 0111'OR�LL In me "rwnaib IV- - tr M the he - I-,. +l +M n(glrr An, dul M. aim ut.r ar AM id phat being tr•i Office, and he .rC oreirr•d erne Kuban i•f the mate .ml btmg e I me drab swum mineur aim unit Ihat Se to 1 o1Dr.r of the rand Comesd rpo rte AM Milt she .cal nDi..d In the pT. d..y Wised meat a the ed t othe 801 of ome Company +M the -id Corporate Coral aim C nrwstio. n. othat mica Ail) Affund rim subscribed At the Id to the vim .it nmmnl by the urn to ., he dirrchen In t r sent C... A n AM that Article IV 6ec0on ilbl of Ow Da•IAa-e of "id fbmpnny rrfcrKd to m the Nreeeding Inatrvmrnt s tale m tone M TESTIMONY %'HEREOF 1 Air. hareem. vet my Ri M, find settled my official Sral At the aty of 1, fish" Me do, AM year Drat .bore written ! Na Public L I:VaNW L Y A11 CERMICATE ` or a 10531 L the uMenirned mlifr thni I ram the RrrnbK of SiInT.TV NRURANCE COHPANY OF CALIFORNIA aim that the attached I`-mar of All.rnry rr.uin! In (sill fern +wl effect AM hn not been r tnWd. Aral fanhetmnre Met Ankle IV, Seetton Trim 11% -1.1111 raid r u'llev 34 Pr' f.rth in ,ad Ihrvrr M Ninme) ire Amt in full fnrce IM effect IN TESTIMONY wHERFOF 1 have hrlrrml+ niNernlvA oil name spa nffuM the corporate w.l of the "Id Company wa_3'iRYEC.1ti ISGE 2._ 1979_ i As o LI — manna, "...ram 0 • 0 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -92 A RESOLUTION 0, THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -39. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: WHEREAS, a site plan (Director Review No 79 -39) submitted by Vitro Strand Technologies located on the east side of Rochester, south of Eighth Street, being a division of a portion of the Rochester Tract was approved by the Community Development Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on July 9, 1979, as Director Review No. 79 -39; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to _ approval of the Director Review by the Community Developnent Director of said City have now been met by Pntry into two improvement agreements guaranteed by acceptable improvement securities titled as "Phase I" and "Phase II" by Vitro Strand Technologies, Inc. as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said improvement agreements and said improvement securities submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thnreto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES: NOES- ABSENT: ATTEST: is City Clerk �3(R Mayor i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Offer of Dedication for "Alder Street" The at'ached letter and map refer to a request by Mr Ronald Spier, to abandon an Offer of Dedication for a street on the south side of his ofDedicationeva atedepreviouslylbynSantBernardinooCountyd other Offers This request originated when Hr. Spiers applied for a building permit for a garage to be constructed at the rear of his property on the existing Offer of Dedication According to City Ordinance 158 -A the construction of a garage does not require the dedication of right -of -way or the con- struction of streei improvements, so no new didiaitons can be required of HeThe existing to the Ci t fDedication has been completely superseded and i • P 0 RECOKIENDATION: it is Offer that the attached approved, Resdlution of Intent heaHngtfor vacate this the December 5, 1979 City Council meeting Respectfully submitted, Lloyd H Dbs City Engineer LH :cd Attachment t4 Octber 23, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga City Engineer 0 Dear Mr Hubbs, This is to request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga vacate the Offer of Dedication on the south 33 feet of my lot, parcel number 208 - 061 -15. During our conversation on October 9, 1979, you assured me that this would be a relatively easy process. Plei:e advise us of any further steps to be taken on our part. Thanking you for this attention, Respectfully, Ronald A Spierb Jr Cynthia A. Spiers 7395 Ramona Ave. 9875179 �5 • =I 0 /�� mm WiN Iry1N 1�i'N t� l��N I I'.iIN > /IK • Z 1 If I, : n� N� ' //9�,� �J n ♦ ol l�)� Iii/0 •9im lilN !i,l lu • I ^.Y 1 •IN •fIK •d lVM V 7VV31� I: 1 N 1 "I w�f N •^I � I .,7' I H � h N� r I �� �� , t i I 1 .1 M ' ;' I 2 I I 0 /�� mm WiN Iry1N 1�i'N IQIN l��N I I'.iIN > /IK • Z 1 If I, : � , ' //9�,� �J n ♦ ol l�)� Iii/0 •9im lilN !i,l lu • I ^.Y 1 •IN •fIK •d lVM V 7VV31� I: 1 i 41 ! I r o p 0 /�� mm WiN Iry1N 1�i'N IQIN l��N I I'.iIN 'i')N • Z 1 If I, : � , ' //9�,� �J n ♦ �R)� l�)� Iii/0 •9im lilN !i,l lu • I' I: 1 1. I I I I .- I ' - - 3nN3AV 'IMRSMU31) mV a a CL € >° 0 I� Q I 7 N u J I r 0 ` s v ! O t � O rrmlvva 'L - -- • Z 1 If I, : � , • I' I 1. I , (R) • I .�• N I .tom :, :r 3 I I 4 �y I•. •' 1' a — 3ntow mV a a CL € >° 0 I� Q I 7 N u J I r 0 ` s v ! O t � O rrmlvva 'L - -- • RESOLUTION NO. 79-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTiON TO VACATE A PORTION OF ALDER STREET, AN OFFER OF DEDICATION, AS SHOWN ON NAP NO. V -005 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLEgK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under SectTo—n—EW, et seq. of the Streets and Higla-vs Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: Tnat the City Council hereby declares its intention tovawte a portion of Alder Street, an offer of dedication, as snown on Flap No. V -005 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which 1s attached hereto marked Exhibit 'A' and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 5th days ecenber, 1979, at 7.00 p.m., in the Lion's Park Cammmity Center, located at 9161 Baseline, Rancho, Cucamonga, California, as the tire and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its determing whether said offer of dedication is • necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to be posted coascuously in the vicinity of the offer of dedication proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on then and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: RIOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET.' SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations a exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the Cr•v Clerk svaTT' attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sa6 to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation F published in t - ti y of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this !lay of 1979. AYES DOES ABSENT: 0 ATTEST ro� City Clerk 40, I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Hanager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Parcel Map #5239 The attached resolution is for the acceptance of an industHal sub- division consisting of 9.5+ acres and 2 lots on the North side of 4th Street west of Turner This subdivision was tentativell approved by the City Engineer on August 01, 1979 and the conditions of approval have been complied with. RECONPIENDATION: It is recommended by the City Engine: that Council adopt t,e resolution accepting the Hap of Parcel Nap 05239. Ibis action will enable the W, Clerk to sign the map for the City and the City Engineer to forward the Is nap for recording Respectfully su mltted, L byd "Nub s City Engineer LH:cd Attachment 1V '- f i C %L :many —;•.T - - rv�nVH- 3 " A 1. � 4 I _�� r•�t ••__5s {" ��� ``TAI' i it RESOLUTION NO. 79 -95 A RESOLUTIM OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLtiWxm. CC11�����A\kL \IA, APPROVING PARCEL HAY NUMER 5239 (TtNTAT1VE N\XE4 . P N\N- 5239) WHEREAS, tentative panda mar Ri*er 52% sutcaitted by Brooks P••:5ucti And, Consisting of two par,jlli, 10fat04 on the north Ile of 3t, \treet west of Haven being a oiVision Pf A �rtion of tot 31. Section 14, T\«a \hln 1 satllii, Range y'west was approved kV the Cit) tngineer of the Cti\ ci Ranriui Nt \:conga, oos, WKpa'A \, %rcel Map "i% 52J9 1\ the final map of U,a division nt iand awW\ed a's shown eA %aid tentative parcP) map: and, wiaaRivi, aU of the - .\gtr�vient% established as y�rerequisite \a toprQ\a1 'af -the final Wall ©, \�a C tV Council of said City have now been Q. %tc _ THEREFORE, BE I gESOLVEO by the City Council of the City of Ram, o vicamonga. Califo;`A1J, lhat said Parcel Hap Number 5239 be and the iw a is hereby approved an Ilia City Engine ^r is authorized to present save to thb Count) Reorder to be filed for record is PASSED, W:'OVED, and ADOPTED this _day of , 1979. AYSi NOE', ABSENT: ATTEST* -- ty er .9 En.y mayor I 1 LJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM, Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed vacation of 8th Street (v -004) The subject vacation was requested by Linville- Sanderson -Horn agrnts for Jerry Swenson. FMS Sorenson is an owner of a plot of land South cr the area proposed to be vacated The land will be used for private develop - ment This area of 8th Street has a physical dead end on the west by the presents of the Devore Freeway and on the east by Day Creek. It is presently undeveloped and there is no public access to the Street REC(*PIEHDATION: eIt is recowended that City Council approve the attached resolution. This will set the public hearing for the vacation on January 02, 1980 Respectfull sub)nitted, Lloyg,Vubbs� � CityEngineer LH:cd •CJ 02 79 -112 LINVILLE SANDERSON HORN&ASSOCIAIES %a? AnnownoutE. SUITE -W CIVILENGINEERS LANDSURVEYORS "11010CUCAMONGw, CN91n9 M40 9601711 • r November 13, 1979 CIty of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 81730 Attention: Encineerinr, Pept Subject: Proposed Vaeation of Eighth rtreet Dear Sir On the behalf of the )djarent owner (Jerry Swenson), 1 request that Eighth Street, formerly rirrt Street per H P 17/7n, be vacated and abandoned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga It is noted tblt in thin area, righth °trc,•t ha been 1 ,,•d to the west, in 1`177, by decd 0111 /1'35 0 R , from k„ nester Avenue to the westerly rirht of way of the Devore Freeway Also, Eighth Street was vacated to the east, In 1951, by road deel 378, from Etiwanda Avenue to the vcaterly line of Day Creek Channel. Yours truly } Cary Sandaerson L S uu5; ) GTS /1 jg 625 0 a Q =c 02 v i I Ul C � S v 4 rr a'✓r<xw H N ,1. C `V 4 � � �? q h iz V ll •Fi r ar azn. ii • r r 0 Paz 0 lJ ~ At �. 3 I ld l.I I rW4 g� L . RESOLUTION NO. 79 -96 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF DIM STREET AS SHOWN ON NAP NO. V -004 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Sxt o%93W'et seq of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate a portion of Eighth Street a City street, as shown on Map No V -004 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which is attached hereto narked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof SECTION 3 That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 2nd day- oT-Ja—nuary, 1960, at 7 00 p.m., in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and • place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its deterring whether said City street is necessary for present or prospective street purposes SECTION 4: That the City Engineer shall cause notices to be posted conspconsp uously along the line of the street or part thereof pronosed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET " SECTION 5 The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and'—exceptions, if any, for existing utilities or record SECTION 6 The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk ss aTT attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in t�C ti y of ntario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Lalifornia PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT Mayor ATTEST �.�[] City Clerk t Resolution No 79 -95 Page 2 PROPOSED VACATION OF EIGHTH STREET FORMERLY FIRST STREET PER M.B. 12/29 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of Eighth Street, 50.00 feet wide, (formerly First Street) as shorn on the Townsite of Rochester as per plat recorded in Book 12 of Maps, Page 29, Records of San Bernardino County, bounded as follows: Ot the rest by the easterly line of that certain property conveyed W the State of California by deed recorded February 2, 1972, In Book 7850, Page 289, Official Records of said County Cn the east by a line measured at right angles from the north line of said Eighth Street, a distance of 50.00 feet southerly to the northeasterly corner of that certain property conveyed to Jerry L. Swenson and Marie Swenson by deed recorded September 26, 1979, in Gook 9779, Page 1112, Official Records. :y, M E M O R A N D U M Date: November 15, 1979 To City Council and City Amnager 7roa. Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department SLbject: Lion's Park Community Center Landscaping The stove roferrnced protect is nearing time to have the required irrigation and landscaping factures installed. This phase was deleted from the overall project contract, due to the higher costs of having the General Contractor involved We believe we have devised various methods of cutting the previous projected cost, i e., purchasing and planting most of the trees with in -house labor; acting as out own "general" to eliminate the 1S% profit margin involved; etc Funding is available under the Contract Services and /or Grtunds 1liintenance portion of the Community Services budget for this year If you have any questions, I will be available to respond. Request a consont calendar item on November 21, 1979 • Thank you. 8R'av E 5 a ORDINANCE 110 86 (Revis=d 11/7/79) All ORDINANCE OF THE CIT LOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING P GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT III THE CITY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND PRIORITY A. Findinas 1. Unmanaged " esidential growth In the City of Rancho Cucamonga can overburden elementary, junior and senior high schools In the community. 2 Unmanaged residential growth can strain public services and result in the impairment of the health, safety and welfare of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Haphazard and disorderly growth patterns adversely affect the City's and public agency's ability to provide adequate public services for all developments 4 111nimal architectural and site design criteria of residential development can create a "tract" appearance in the community Such an appearance detrimentally affects the physical character and image of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Further, lack of landscaping and desion sensitivity can diminish the environmental quality and economic well being of the community S Continued unmanaged growth can seriously impair the City's ability to carry out the goals and policies cf the General Plan and can adversely affect the health and welfare of the Co.munity 8 Furpose A Growth Management Plan is designed to implement certain primary goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan These goals constitute the purpose of a Growth Management Plan and are as follows 1. To preserve and enhance the physical character of the cornen I ty 2 To help ensure that adequate school facilities for all existing and future residential development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are provided ✓�? Ordinance No. 86 -2- Revised 11/1/79 3 To help ensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga • 4. To ensure that minimum design quality in new developments is provided to enhance the aesthetic, environmental, historical and economic well being of the comninity. 5. To encourage use of energy conservation techniques in new residential development 6 To help maintain and improve levels of City admin ntrative services 7 To encourage orderly development of residences 0 areas more readily served by public services. B. To encourage the development of master planned projects which provide the service needs of the residents of those projects 9. To encourage the provision of a variety of housing types and encourage affordable housing. C Scope This ordinance shall apply to all residential development projects in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as defined in Section 2 SECTi011 2. DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms shall have the meaning indicated: A. CitY - City in this ordinance refers specifically to the City of Rarcho Cucamonga 8 Custom tot Subdivision - A subdivision which creates parcels to be sold in an undeveloped state to individual owners for development of not more than four units per owner C Growih Nana anent Committee - A committee composed of members o t r onnun ty Deve opnent Department, Community Services Department, Fire District, Cucamonga County Water District, and Police Department in charge of rating Residential Development Projects per the criteria of the Residential Assessment System established by thL City Council D Panda for Criteria - Criteria considered essential for all residential development Ordinnnce No. 86 -3- Revised 1117179 E Residential Development Protect - Any development which will resuT�n a su vb—di s ail n of residential tots and/or the construction of new residential dwelling units including single family, multi - family, apartments, condominiums, townhouses, planned communities, planned unit developments, modular units, condominium conversions of dwelling units which have not been built prior to the effective date of this ordinance and mobilehome Parks F Residential Assessment S stem - The measuring device, provided y eso ut on o e ty Council and adopted concurrently herewith, which is composed of a number of rating criteria used for assigning point ratings to proposed residential development projects. G. Threshold Point Limit - The minimum number of points a project is required to receive under the Residential Assessment System in order to receive consideration for approval. H. Total Development - The total review of a residential development project including tentative tract map approval, unit placement, landscaping, design review, etc. _ I. Tract Subdivision - A subdivision which creates five or more parcels to be developed as a whole by an owner or builder and which hereby shall be required to re -apply as a Total Development. Such re- application shall be required as a condition of tentative tract approval which shall be satisfied prior to apprw.. ' and • recordation of the final map. SErTION 3: EXEMPTIONS The following projects shall be specifically exempt from the provisions of this Ordinance. A. Single family, duplex and triplex developments involving a total of four (4) units or less provided that any such applicat`zn on a parcel shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a building permit for the last unit on said parcel. B. Residential land divisions involving four (4) lots or less provided that any such application on a parcel having the same zoning district shall be on a one time basis only for a two year period from the date of issuance of a buildinq permit for the last unit of the proiect. Subdivisions for the sole purpose of senarating different zoning districts shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance Further divisions of the residential portion of such subdivisior§ shall be subject to the provisions of this ordinance C. Government subsidized senior citizen housing projects ® D. Renewable building permits issued prior to the effective date of this ordinance n�5 ordinance No. 86 -4- E. Condominium conversions of dwelling units built prior to the effective date of this ordinance. F. Tentative tract maps approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance. G. Site Approval or Director Review applications approved prior to the effective date of this ordinance. SECTION 4. APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND FEES A. Application ,In application for a residential development project shall be made to the Community Development Department and may be in one of two forms: (1) Total Development package including tentative tract map approva. t5Tacement, landscaping, design reviev, etc , and (2) Custom Lot /Tract Subdivision package The following information shall included n the Total Development package and the Custom Lot /Tract Subdivision package: i Site Utilization Hap including a Vicinity Hap to show the relat%,.ship of the proposed evelopoent to adjacent development and surrounding . area (small inset map) b. Use Layout Nap showing the location and type of proposed residential use or uses, the nature and extent of open space, the extent of any other uses proposed and indication of all adjacent uses 2. Detailed Site Plan to include detailed information specified in forms prcvided by the Community Development Department. 3 If residential development croject is submitted as a Total Development, then an Illustrative Site Plan to include proposed and existing improvements, landscape concepts and other elements a-. may be necessary to illustrate the site plan shall be submitted 4 If residential development project is submitted as a Total Develop—nt, then a Preliminary Architectural Plan showing typicals of all sides of proposed buildings and structures indicating materials to to used, trees, landscaping, and shadows to give elevations graphic dimension shall be Submitted rl �JJ 56 Revised 11/7/79 Ordinance No 86 concetual -s- 6 map showing9aa generaldindication indication type, features extent. and time of grading as per requirements of the City's Grading Ordinance. 6 Development schedule of anticipated Proposed project including phasing B. fees Although no growth managejent review fees will be assessed any residential development pn ject. the extensions, for Subdivisions- director :views. site r C shall be •ssed as per City Council Fee Resolution. said fees shall be non - refundable even in the event the threshold point limit is not met. SECTION 5. hAIJOATOR� - Certain residential development criteria are considered essential to ensure General Plan consistency and adequate P°blic services far each the project. in the event associations and others individuals and eg oupsv are developers. • encouraged respective " problems -io ordersihattservicescoysbe availableifor pecia to solve development Letters from special districts identifying ability criteria, - referential serve shall be issuedn'is Devetopmentcshalleensjai development project The Director of Comma Y royal of any restdential development project are met prior to final aDP royal of subjectasucondiprovisio apDrnvalswhtehnmust be met prior rto approval of a final map for a subdivini °nror prior to issuance of building permits for residentialbeemetoin ihepfallowingtorderhan subdivisions. Said 0 A. Services 1 The proposed project must be con totmeetingecriteria 2. plan This criteria shall be met P 2 Directoriwrittenacertification fra�lnaff Development affected elementary and high School Districts that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accomodating students generated by the proposed project This cer tlfication shall be obtained prior to meeting criteria 3 �_7 ordinance No 86 "6" The applicant shall sutmit to the Community Development • Director written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project. hs Santa facilities le Board and the City, written certification of acceptability including all supportive information shall be obtained and submitted to the City Appeals Any aggrieved party who perceives unjusi.ified rr inequitable demands by a service agency or agencies under the mandatory criteria may appeal in writing to the Plannir, Commission stating the justification for the appeal. The Planning Commission will recommend to the City Council as to the dispensation of the Appeal. Mandatory Criteria Option Mandatory criteria may be met by the estabiishnent of private service districts to provide public service capacity in lieu of existing public service districts provided that such districts • do not violate any federal, state, county or local regulation and are approved by the City Council. SECTION 6: REVIEW AND PROCESSING PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A. Establishment of a Residential Assessment System. A Residential Assessment System adopted by the Council shall establish five (5) basic categories and each category shall be assigned a maximum total points which will then be divided into sub - categories for rating purposes. The five basic categories are: (1) Public Services, (2) Design Quality, (3) Affordable Housing, (4) Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments (PUD), and (5) Orderly Development Applications for Total Development shall be rated by the Growth Management Committee for (1) Public Services, (2) Affordable Housing, (3) Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments (PUD) and (4) Orderly Development, and by the Design Review Committee for Design Quality Applications for Custom Lot /Tract Subdivisions shall be rated by the Growth Management Committee for (1) Public Services, (2) Site Orientation and Street Design and (3) 0 -derly Development. After rating, if the project meets or exceeds the Threshold Point Limit, the subdivision will proceed to the rte' OrdinanL'! No. 86 -7- Revised 1117/79 Planning Commissirn for review and action For those Custom Lot Subdivisions that are proposed to be built as a whole or to-,al project and for Tract Subdivisions hatuoer received Planning Commission approval, DP Development, Section 1, Resolution No 79 -74, shall be required as a condition of approval to be approval and recordation of final map Said re -app at any time and is not subject to the application review dates stated herein. Projects shall be evaluated under the Residential Assessment System Tri- annually by the Commn,ty Development Director Application submittal deadline dates and review dates shall be as follows Review Period 1 - August 1 - Noveebar 30 pp cat on f ing perird - August 1 - August 31 Review Period 2 - December 1 - Parch 31 )Cpp cat un t ing period - December 1 - December 31 Review Period 3 - April 1 - oily 31 PP tat on Mng period - Ap -il 7 - April 30 (NOTE The first application filing period shall be August 1, 1980) OA ihreshold Point Limit shall be established by the City Council as part of the Residential Assessment System. This Threshold Point Limit shall const.tute the minimum number of ve If considerationforiapprovaleby the cPlanning it comnissione given Those tentative tract applications that were previously filed under the County of San Bernardino but not approved by the San Bernardio processlag oru filing auntil RReeviiewsPeriod allas sta ted th ted r ove Within (5) days after the point rating determination, the Community Development Director shall cause a written notice u be maile, (certified) to the applicant stating the point rating for his residential development project and wnether his application further considerationiby theuPlanningeChd t Limit ssion for i Anneal of Ratings Ratings of applications bj the Growth Management Committee and /or the Design Review Committee may be appe, ed to blit or Plahnina Commission by any aggrieved person, or body. D private, within fourteen (14) days after the day of decision. ordinance No 86 -8- The decision of the Planning Commission of any such appeal may be appealed to the City Council by any aggrieved party in the . same manner and time limitations as are set forth for the filing of an appeal with the Planning Commission The decision of the City Council shall be .final SECTION 7: PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW Applications subject to the provisions of this ordinance and subject to Planning Commission review and approval shall be evaluated in terms of environmental review and clearance, subdivision review pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, and residential development project -eview pursuant to the Growth Management Plan The Planning Commission shall approve or deny the project after said review. The Planning Commission shall also hear appeals of point ratings as described in Section 68 SECTION 8: BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE No building permits shall be issued fir any residential dwelling unit which is subject to the Provisions of this Ordinance without approval as provided herein. • SECTION 9 TIME LIMITS FOR APPROVAL A Expiration of Approval The following provision shall apply to applications for Residential Development Projects except as specifically exempted by Sectinn 3 of this ordinance Residential development projects approved after the effective date of this Ordinance shall expire after twelve (12) months from date of approval. Extension of Tentative Sdbdivision Approval A person who has filed a tentative subdivision may request an extension of approval or conditional approval from the Planning Commission by �.ritten application to the Coamunity Development Department. Such an extension request application must be filed at least sixty (60) days before the approval or conditional approval is due to expire. The application shall contain a W •ement of the reasons for the extension and a detailed descrlotion of the progress made towards meting all the i �6 Ordinance No. 86 _q- Revised conditions for final approval If an extension is granted, new conditions may be imposed and existing conditions may be revised by the Planning Commission. Any extension of a subdivision shall not exceed a period of eighteen (18) months SECTION 10 ANNUAL REVIEW AND EXPIRATION This Ordinance shall be reviewed annually by the City :ouncil and Planning Commission and shall be of no further force or effect iftar a period of five (5) years from the date of adoption of this Ordinance, uiless extended by Ordinance of the City Council. SECTION 11: OTHER LAWS, ORDERS AND ORDINANCES Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect, annul or abrogate any other laws or ordinances pertaining or applicable to the properties and areas affected by this Ordinance, nor shall it be deemed to conflict with any State laws, orders or requirements affecting such properties or areas In the event tnat a conflict does arise, the more restrictive ordinance shall apply. SECTION 12: SEVERABILITY O The invalidity of any work, section, clause, paragraph, sentence, part or provisions of this Oriinance shall not affect the validity of any part of this Ordinance which can be given affect without such invalid part or parts. This Ordinance shall be n full force and effect at 12:01 a.m. on the 31st day after its adoption SECTION 13: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the sane to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least onca in The D�or Re rt., a newspaper of general circulation published in the CFty of Onta California, and circulated to the Ci y of Rancho Cucamonga, Califcrnia PASSED. APPROVEU, and ADOPTED this day of 1919 AYES: NOES - ABSENT: Mayor ® ATTEST: City Clerk 61 2 RESOLUTION 110. 79 -74 (Revised 11/7/79) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESS- MENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted Ordinance No. 86 entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga, California, establishing a Growth Ha.agement Plan to Regulate New Residential Development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ", which requires that a Residential Assessment System for development review be established, setting forth five (5) basic categories, each category being assigned a maximum number of total points which shall be used for rating purposes, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City has recommended adoption of a Growth Management Plan to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the purposes of the Growth Management Plan as set forth in paragraph B of Section 1 of said Ordinance and the criteria required to be considered in paragraph A. Srction 6 of said Ordnance including, but not limited to, Public Services, Design Quality, Affordable Housing. Planned Communities and Planned Unit Developments, and Orderly Development. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a Residential Assessment System is established based upon the following criteria for total Development SECTION 1 PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilities The Growth Management Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff. A prof " -t must receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in orde.• to receive further consideration (10 pts, maximum) 1 Project drains into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated 8 point s) 2. Project buildE muster planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond linits of site which is also capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points) 617 Resolution No 79 -74 Page 2 Revised 11/7/79 3. Project provides special drainage facilities (e g , on- • site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (I point) (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Comrunitles, P U.0 's,phased caster planned developments,etc , Drainage Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire projper and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project) B. Street Circulation and Improvements The Growth Management Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project A project must receive a minimum of 5 points in this category to order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum). 1 Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (5 points) 2 Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points) 3 Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points) 4 Project will build or widen a collecto. street or is located adjacent to a fully improved collector street (4 points) S. Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above the-. required by City standards (2 points). (NOTE For projects submitted as Pl.-nned Communities. P U.D.'s. phased master planned develoi•ments, etc . Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project). C. Residential Safety and Security The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department and the Foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project incorporates safety and security techniques. A project must receive a minimum of 3 points In each of the following categories in order to receive further consideration (8 points maximum). 63 Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 3 Revised 11/7/19 c 70 - 80% of project is between a five and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (I point) 1. Police Protection (4 points maximum) a. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval by the Planning Commission or Community Development Director on over 70% of its perimeter (2 points) b. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Commission or Community Development Director between 25% and 705 of its perimeter (1 point) c Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points) d. Security devices such as window locks will be installed in each unit (I point) e. Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting placement, etc., to enhance residential security (1 point) (NOTES: 1 For project submitted as Planned Communities, • P.0 p.'s, phased master planned developments, etc , Police Protection shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point totrl shall be applied to each phase of that project). 2. Portions that are ad.tacent to property held by u6T c aides nc ui —lain uoi )invited to projected par s, projectea project schoot sites, the atF tional Forest. flood contiol retention basins, etc. shall not be cou rte a a nst or towar the requirements of a an 3. If t•i a "cant o is for Points c. d. and 2se w e ncor orat as con tons of apnroya oil the tentat ye tract map. 2 Fire Protection (4 points maximum) a. 70% - 80: of the project is within a three minute riving response time of a fire station (4 points). b. 7Gi - 80: of project is between a three and five minute driving response time of a fire station (2 points) c 70 - 80% of project is between a five and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (I point) 4 Resolution 79 -74 Page 4 Revised 11/1/19 d Fire Wtigation measures (e 9 , fire resistant building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc )are incorporated into the design of the pro ject (2 points). (NCTE: !f the a licant omits for point 2(d),1t will be ncor orated as conditions of a royal of the entat ye tram map 0. Parks and Paths The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and /or private parks and usable open space. A project must receive a minimum 0 2 points to this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum) 1 Project provides on or off site public park improvements and /or school recreational facilities (1 point) 2. Project provides privately owned and maintained on site recreational facilities (1 point) 3 Project connects residential areas to usable open space and public and /or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible (1 point) 4 Project provides trails or bikeways (1 point) 5. Over 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of an existing public park site (4 points) 6. Over 50% of project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park site (1 point) 7 Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of an existing public park site (2 points) 8 Over 50% of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of a future proposed public park site (112 point). 9 More than 50% of project is located within a 1/2 mile radius of usable public open space other than public parks (e g . school facilities, national forest, etc ) (2 points) (NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P.U.D.'s.phased master planned developments, etc , provision of parks shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project.) 4b, Resolution No 79 -74 Revised 11/7/79 Page 5 E Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center . The Growth Management Committee shall review each project for its location to existing and future neighborhood commercial shopping centers For the purposes of this section a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points naximum) 1, liore than 50% of project is withi, 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points). 2 More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) 3. More than 50: of project is between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) 4 Ibre than 505 of project is between 2 ana 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) 5 Project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) F Project Maintenance The project provides for a Homeowner's Association and /or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site main- tenance (3 points) (NOTE. If the City determines that there are no public right -of -ways within or adjacent to the project that normally require city maintenance, the project will receive the maximum points in this category) SECTION 2: SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN The Growth Management Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of lot sizes and configurations to accommodate terrain and street design, and also, variability of lot sizes to encourage corresponding variations of house designs and orientations. If this category does not apply to a Residential Development Project, then such project will receive the maximum number of points (up to 10 points maximum) Criteria The following criteria represent the aeneral types of Site Orientation and Street Design elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points. /a Resolution No 79 -74 Page 6 A. Site Orientation 1 Minimizes crowding and enhances spacial relationships (e g by avoiding excessively deep and narrow lots) 2 Preserves desirable views and vistas by proper lot and housing layout 3 Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites 4 Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation 5 Designs lots and structures to minimize noise through the use of setbacks, proper location of air conditioning units, living areas and the like 6 ,,reates visual relief along residential streets (e g , varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc ). B Street Design 1 The design of streets and parking encourage safe, efficient circulation and fire access while maintaining acceptable fire response time a Fast through traffic is discouraged by use of curvilinear street design and /or other design techniques b. Avoids short blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul -de -sacs) whenever possible. c Street layout and site orientation promote the privacy of residential neighborhoods d Parking access is from local streets rather than secondary or major streets. 2. Public transportation is c.icouraged by the project. a Locates bus stops as part of the development wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus routes b Provides bus pullout areas and covered waiting areas for user wherever necessary as a result of planned or current bus routes 3 Varies sidewalk dimensions and patterns to avoid monotony 4 Provides handicapped access to the project 67 i Resolution No. 79 -74 .age 7 Revised 11/7/79 . SECTION 3 ORDERLY DEVELOPMEUT The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than "leap -frog development" Two- thirds of a point will be granted for each 10% of the project that is within 500' of existing development or 500' within proposed development which has been approved by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including,but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc , shall not be counted against or towamd the requirements (6 points maximum) SECTION 4: DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design The Design Review Committee (consisting of two appointed members of the Planning Commission and the Director of Community Development or his designate), shall review each project for architectural design quality as indicated by the quality of construction and by the architectural elevations of the proposed buildings judged 'r. terms of architectural style, size and height A project must receive a minimum f 8 poIntl to this category in order to receive • further cons derat. on (mu po n s n„uxm7uml Criteria The following criteria represents the general types of Architectural Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points It is not the intent of the Growth Management Plan to dictate a particular architecture nor to encourage certain priced materials nor dictate specific design solutions It is the intent of the Growth Management Plan to foster creative design solutions and to discourage discriminatory review of higher cost versus lower cost projects 1. Provides various visual ,.nd tactile textures by using an assortment of building materials to finish surface 2 Creates variety in cesign and architecture that creates strong identity a Project provides a mix of siffering one story dwellings and /o^ a mix of one and two story dwellings to achieve a variety of housing mix and to reduce the sameness of the project b. Varies the types of building materials within a project to create diversity, yet not creating excessive contrasts. 6 �/ Resolution No 79 -74 Page 8 Revised 11/7/79 c. Varies the color and design of housing units with particular attention to common themes without creating excessive contrasts d Provides special design features such as curvilinear walks, textured walkways, etc B Landscape and Screening Design The Design Review Committee shall review each project for Landscape and Screening Design Such review will determine compdtibility of all trees, shrubs, ground cover, walls and fences, mounding, paths, lighting, etc , with the topography and site characteristics of the project A project must receive a minimum of 9 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum) Criteria The following criteria represent the general types of Landscape and Screening Design elements the Design Review Committee shall consider in their evaluation Projects may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points Each criteria may or may not apply to both single family dwellings and multi- family dwellings If such criteria 1s not applicable, and no landscaping is required by the city, then the project will be eliqible for the maxim= number of points in this category Landscaping materials are utilized to provide home privacy and also screen trash and storage areas 2 Landscaping techniques and building materials are used to enhance the quality of the site and architecture 3 Project provides interior parkway landscape and irrigation Improvements 4 Planting materials blend with and enhance the architectural design of the development. 5 Fences, hedges, walls, etc , are compatible with and enhance the architectural design of the development. 6 Trees are used for screening adjacent streets and enhancing site quality 7 Stabilization of slopes is promoted by landscaping techniques which prevent slope erosion 8 Lighting sources are screened to minimize light spill . over from one house to its neighbor (0 q Resolution No 79 -74 Revised 11/7/79 Page 9 • 9 Drought resistent plants are utilized. 10. Ear.hen berms are placed to delineate the use of spaces, provide privacy, reduce noise, control wind, mitigate flooding, frame views, etc 11 Grouped parking areas are landscaped to provide shading and visual screening from streets and buildings. 12 Apartment /condominium and condominium conversion tree planting meets or exceeds the City standard o• 50 trees /gross acre C. Energy Conservation The Growth Management Committee shalt review each project submitted for provisions of passive and active energy conservation techniques used in terms of architectural design, landscaping, and site orientation (5 points maximum, partial points may be achieved) 1 Building orientation and landscaping are designed to maximize the use of passive solar heating in winter months and cooling winds in summer months ® a Buildings are situated to maximize passive solar heating in winter months (e.g., east-west aligned units, south facing windows, etc ) (1 point) r] b windows are placed to allow cooling from prevailing westerly summer breezes (1/2 point c Tree planting considers any effects on the use or future installation of residential solar energy collectors (1/2 point) 2 Units are pre - plumbed for adaption to solar energy heaters (2 points) 3 Energy conserving building materials and appliances are incorporated into the architectural design, (e.g , reduced conmription shower heads, better grade insulation, double pane windows, etc ) (1 point) 4 Development provides option to homebuyers to purchase solar energy collectors for heating purposes (2 points). SECTION 5: AFFORDABLE HOUSING The Growth Management Committee shall review all projects for the provision of adecuate housing for all segments of the population in a Resolution No. 79 -74 Revised 11/7/79 Page 10 order to create diversified neighborhood environments and income groups, avoiding concentrations of any single income group in one particular neighborhood Those residential development projects which provide "affordable" housing shall be given additional point consideration as well as opportun'ties for density bonuses ,or purposes of this section, Affordable Housing is defined as Owner Occupied. Projects which are sponsored through government programs or privately financ6d through market rate programs having a price range of . 5 times 80 -120% of the current median family income of San Bernardino county consistent with the City's Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) This income figure shall be readjusted annually and is currently $14,800 - RenterOccu ied Fair market rent in San Bernardino County as defined y Sect a a t the Housing and Cmmunity Development Act which shall be readjusted periodically and is currently:** B of Bedroons Detached Semi- netached /Row Hatkup Elev (2 -4 stories 0 - 262 280 1 - 348 316 336 460 425 3r7 399 3 512 471 409 - 4 568 535 454 - The above figures include the price of utilities and may be increased by not more than 130 if allowable by the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act For projects which do not Include utilities In the rental rates, the following deductions from the above dcscribed fair market rates shall be made: ! of Bedrooms Deductions for Utilities 0 25 1 30 2 35 3 40 4 45 •Hedian family income of San Bernardino County is current as of January, 1979 "Fair iaarket rent is current as of April, 1979 7 r i 0 • Resolution No 79 -74 Revised 11/7/79 Page 11 Criteria 1 Affordable housing shall be evaluated using the following criteria a Project provid,� 15% or more affordable housing (6 points, up tj 20% density bonus) b. Project provides 5 to 15Z affordable housing (4 points, up to 10% density bonus) c Project provides I to 5% affordable housing (2 points, up to 5% density bonus) ;NOTE For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P U.D.'s, phased master planned developments, etc., Affordable Housing shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project This section may not be implmnented until the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance have been amended to allow for density bonuses) SECTION 6 PLANNED CrM. JNITIES AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (P.U.D.) A. Planned Communities The Growtn Mansganent Committee shall review each project submitted as a Planned Community for the degree to which it achieve,, a variety of housing types, provides public facilities and se-vices, efficient internal circulation and overall integration of residential design factors For purposes of this oro4n.nce, an application submitted as a Planned Co^munity must consist of a minimum of 300 acres (up to 3 points maximum Criteria The following criteria represent the qeneral types of elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider when evaluating Planned Communities Such developments may include other criteria not specifically mentioned here and still be eligible for the maximum number of points 1 Provides for a variety of housing types and costs to complement existing housing in the immediate erea, i.e Owner Occu fed: single family, multi- femily rawnhouses, Eon om mums ); Rental. Apartments, duplexes and elderly family 2 Provides for necessary public facilities, e 9 , sewer and water lines, fire facilities, school fecilities, etc , to serve the residents of the development 3 Provides an efficient internal circulation system designed to maximize safety and minimize congestion and monotony, vfiich is integrated with the City's Master Street Plan i� 4 Creates various and diverse architectural and site design themes throughout the development, however, not over exagerating any one thane 7v� Page 12 " Revised 110/79 B. Planned Un't Developments (PUD) Planned Unit Developments (PUD's) which are not a part of an adopted Planned Community shall receive 1 point for each 5 acres of planned unit development not to exceed a total of 3 points for the entire project SECT:ON 7. CUSTOM LOT /TRACT SUCDIVISIONS This section will evaluate those factors applicable to Custom Lot /Tract Subdivisions and derive a point rating which would apply to any future residential development project of five units or more. For approved Custom Lot Subdivisions that are later proposed to be built as a whole or total project of five or more units and for Tract Subdivisions that have received Planning Cormission approval, re- application ,hall be required under Total Development, Section. 1, of this Resolution to receive further ratings to the Design quality, Affordable Housing, and Planned Com•.0 ^ities and P U O.'s sections as a condition of approval prior to the •,pp-•ovai and recordation of the Final Map If the subdivision requires substant.al changes in the originally approved map, then a re- review shall be required under Sections 1,2, d ,. of this resolution Applications for Custom Lot /Tract Subdivision shall be rated using the following criteria A. Public Services Drainage Facilities The Growth Management Committee shall review each project to determine its ability and capacity to adequately dispose of surface runoff. A project most receive a minimum of 8 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum) a Project drains into an existing or planned storm drain or street capable of handling the surface water generated (8 points). b. Project builds master planned facilities with supplemental capacity for drainage or extends facilities beyond limits of site which are capable of handling the surface water generated by the project (2 points). 75 0 E lJ Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 13 c Project provides special drainage facilities (e g., on -site storm drains, underground facilities and drainage facilities maintained by homeowners) to alleviate grading constraints (1 point) LOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Com anities.P.0 D.'s, phased master planned development. etc , Drainage Facilities shall be evaluated for the entire project and the points shall be applied to each phase of that project) Street Circulation and improvements The Growth Management Committee shall review each project in terms of street circulation and by its ability to handle the traffic generated by the project. A project must receive a minimum of 5 points in this category in order to receive further consideration (10 points maximum) a Project will build or widen a major or secondary highway or is located adjacent to a fully improved major or secondary highway (S points) I, ' • b Traffic generated by the proposed project will not substantially alter existing traffic patterns or overload the existing street system (5 points). 21 c Project provides street improvements beyond project limits for traffic continuity and safety (3 points) d Project will build or widen a collector street or is io ^ated adjacent to a fully Improved collector street w2 points). e Project provides special boulevard treatment over and above that required by the City standards (2 points) (NOTE for projerts submitted as Planned Communities, P U D.'s, phased master planned developments. etc . Street Circulation and Improvements shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project). 3 Residential Safety and Security The Growth ittnagement Committee shall review each project for its ability to be adequately served by the San Bernardino County Sneriffs Department and the Foothill Fire District and the extent to which the project 7� Page 14 Revised 11/1/19 incorporates safety and security techniques. A project must receive a minimum of ' points in each of the following categories in order to receive further consideration (8 points maximum). • Police Protection (4 points maximum) 1. Project site 1s within 500' of existing development or proposed development that hus received approval by the Planning Commission or Community Development Director on over 703 of its perimeter (2 points). 2. Project site is within 500' of existing development or proposed development that has received approval of the Planning Commission or Community Development Director between 25% and 70% of its pertmeter (1 point). 3. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks will be installed (2 points). 4. Security devices such as window locks will be Installed in each unit (1 point). S. Uses site planning and architectural techniques such as defensible space design, lighting placement, etc , to enhance residential security • 0 point). (110TE5: 1. For projects submitted as Planned Communities, P U.D.'s, phased nester planned developments, etc., Police Protection shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project. 2. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc , shall not be counted against or toward the requirements of a(1) and a(2) 3. If the applicant opts for Points a(3), a(4), and a(5), these will be incorporated as conditions of approval of the tentative tract map) b. Fire Protection (4 points maximum) 1 70 - 80: of the project is within a three minute driving response time of a fire station (4 points) 2. 70: - 80: of project is between a three and five minute drivintLressmonse time of a fire station (2 points) 7: Resolution 110. 79 -74 Page 15 std 11/7/79 3. 701 - BO% of project is between a five and seven minute driving response time of a fire station (1 point) 4. Fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistent building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) are incorporated into the design of the project (2 points). (NOTE.- if the incorporated castconditionspofnapprovalw will of 09 tentative tract map)- 4. Parks and Paths The Growth Management eonmittee shall review each project for its provision of and location to public and /or private parks and usable open space. A project must receive a minimum of 2 Points in this category in order to receive further consideration (6 points maximum). a Project provides on or off site public Park improvements and /or school recreational facilities (1 point). b Project provides privately owned and natntained on site recreational facilities 0 Poi.,t) c Project connects resident'al areas to usable open spice and public and /or private park sites with low maintenance foot pathways wherever possible 0 point) d. Project provides trails or bikeways 0 point) e. Over 501 of project is located within a 1/2 mite radius of an existing public park site (4 points) f Over 501. of project is located within 1/2 mile radius of a future proposed public park situ (1 point) g Over 50: of project is located between 112 .,nd 1 mile radii of an existing public park site 12 points) h. Over 50: of project is located between 1/2 and 1 mile radii of a future proposed public park site (112 point) i More than 50s of project 1s located within a 1/2 mite radius of usable public oven space other than public parks (e.g , school facilities. Rational Forest, etc ) (2 points) 7� Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 16 Revised 11/7/79 (NOTE: For projects submitted as Planned Communities, • P U D. 's, phased master planned deve' ^dents, etc., Parks and Paths shall be evaluated for the entire project and the point total shall be applied to each phase of that project) S. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center The Growth Hanagement Cam, ittee shall review each project for its location to existing and future neighbor- hood commercial shopping centers. For the purpose of this section, a "neighborhood commercial shopping center" shall mean a retail center with at least one grocery store which has a minimum of 20,000 square feet of gross floor area (3 points maximum) a. More than 50% of project is within 2 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (3 points). b. More than SO- of project is within 2 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) c More than 50% of project 1s between 2 and 3 miles of an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (2 points) d More than 50% of project is between 2 and 3 miles of a planned future neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 point) e Project is more than 3 miles from an existing neighborhood commercial shopping center (1 po nt) 6. Protect 10intenance The project provides for a Homeowner's Associati n and/or Maintenance District to ensure both on and off site maintenance (3 points) (NOTE If the City determines that there are no public right-of-ways within or adjacent to the project that normally require city maintenance, the project will receive the maximum points in this category) Site Orientation and Street Design The Growth Management Committee shall review site orientation of each project to determine variability of tot sizes and configurations 7? Revised 11/7/79 Resolution to. 79 -74 Page 17 to of lotosizesttotencouragedcorresoondingnvarataons.ofhous variability de i andd rtentations. If this category does not aillyreceive giau0 tta� Development Project then such project 1+I theemaxlmum number oT pints iup �0 10 points max ia=). Criteria The following criteria renresentsthe general types of Site Orientation and St, "• ;eslgn elements the Growth Management Committee shall consider in their evaluation. Project may stilldbe specifically oft Point here and s Site Orientation relationships 1, (en9m.zby avoiding excessivelys tial deep and narrow lots). 2 Preserves desirable vlees and vistas Ly proper lot and housing layout. 3. Minimizes sharp angled lots constituting poor building sites 4 Designs lots and structures to integrate with the natural topography and vegetation. Is 6 use ssetbacks, Proper,I ocationi 0fmair conditioning h the ef units, living areas and the like 6 Creates visual relief along residential streets (e.g.. varying building setbacks, roof patterns, landscape treatment, etc 1 Street Design 1 circulationoand tfire access rwhile emaintaining f efficient acceptable fire response time a through and dotherrdeslgny curvi- linear b Avoids shor blocks, dead end and half streets (as opposed to cul -de -sacs) whenever Possible c layout o promote the residential neighborhoods privacy o d Parking access is from local streets rather than if secondary or major streets Resolution No. 79 -74 Page 18 Revised 11/7/79 C. Orderly Development t The Growth Management Committee shall re few all projects for the extent to which they accomplish the orderly and continuous extension of existing development rather than 'leapfrog development'. Two - thirds of a point will be granted for each 10: of the project that is within 500' of existing development or within 500' of proposed development which has been approved by the Planning Commission or the Community Development Director. Portions that are adjacent to property held by public agencies including but not limited to projected parks, projected school sites, the National Forest, flood control retention basins, etc., shall not be counted against or toward the requirements (6 points maximum). SECTION 8: THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT The City Council hereby sets a Threshold Point Limit of 68 points for Total Development and 43 points for Custom Lot /Tract Subdivisions. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council as follows: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby adopts Resolution No 79 -74 establishing the Residential Assessment System. ATTEST. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this .—day of , 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk ----- FWY—or � ,7F • 0 eesolutien Page 19 • C_J CATEGORY I. PUI A. E. C. D. E. F. RESMWTIAL ASSPSSKM SYSTDN - TOTAL DEVELOPMENT ILIC SERVICES Drainage Facilities Street Circulation and Improvements Pesideatial Safety a Security 1. Police Protection 2. Fire Protecticm Parks a Paths Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center Project Maintenance II. SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN IIl. ORDERLY IV. DESIGN QUALITY A. Architectural Design 0. Landscape c Screening Design C. Energy Conservatlon MM. POINTS PERCENTAGE 10 (6 pts. =in) 11.1\ 10 (5 Pts. min) 11.1\ 4 0 Pts. min) 4 (7 pts. min) 6 (2 Pte. min) 3 1 40 10 b 30 (8 Pis. min) 10 (e Pte. min) 5 25 V. AFFMASL.E HOOSIIIG 6 VI. PL.AtO= CDMHOSITIES G PUD's 3 TOTALS 90 Points THRESHOLD POINT LIMIT: 68 Pints (NOTEs Percentages may not add uP to 100 due to rounding). 4.4\ 4.4\ 6.7\ 3.3\ 3.3\ 44.3\ 11.1\ 6.7\ 11.1\ 11.1\ 5.6\ 27.8\ 6.7\ 3.3\ 99.9\ Page 20 RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM - CUSTOM LOT/T A= 60HDrvISIGNs • CATEGORY I. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Drainage Facilitis■ B. Street Circulation and Improvements C. Residential Safety a Security 1. Police Protection 2. Fire Protection D. Parks and Paths E. Neighborhood Commercial Shopping Center P. Project Maintonanca II. SITE ORIENTATION AND STREET DESIGN III. ORDERLY DEVELOPMERr MM. POINTS PERCENTAC? 10 (S pts. min) 17.9% 10 (5 pre. min) 17.9% (3 pts. min) d (3 pre. min) 6 (2 pte. min) 3 3 40 10 6 TOTAL, 56 Points THRESHOLD POINT' LIMITt 43 Points (NOTE, percentages may not add up to 100 due to rot - riding). ISr 7.1% 7.1% 10.7% 5.4% 5.4; 71.5% 17.9% 10.7% 100.1% • C MEM0RANDUH DATE: November 16, 1979 TO: city manager and Members of the city Council FROM: Assistant City Manager SUBJECT- Advisory fp miss Sale of Safe tionSto Repeal Ordinance 178 the sit Council received a At its regular meeting of October 17, 1979, Y recommendation from the Advisory FoissiOnito repeal Ordinance No. 78 District and after hearing testimony from :itizens regarding :I�e problems encountered with Council abuse referred fireworks recommendation back to RanchodCucamongoamisstonito haarctestimony fronts the service clubs On November 1, a special meeting of the Advisory CommlSSion was held with representatives from most of the service clubs Before representatives from each of the service clubs addressed the commission, Chief Lee of the Foothill Fire District restated his concerns regarding safe and sane fireworks and distributed a resolution from the Fire District requesting the City Council repeal Ordinance No. 78 which allows for the sale of safe and sane fireworks !ndividual members of each service club then addressed the Commission fined and outlined the extent and variety of youth oriented programs by the service clubs in Rancho Cucamonga They also explained the in financial funds of part these and the thedclubsuwho have raising funds to booths ears stated that this represented the had fireworks booths io previous y largest single source of revenue for the year. Several is the club his on booths representatives who were c ounting twereydependent upon the America, Rotary, Sans of Italy), stated they however. they ewould studvsalternative forms off funding finance was repeated, the In spite of the pleas from the service clubs, the Advisory Commission voted again to reiterate their last motion to the City Council which ands anedfireworksp¢aThefconsensuseu fo the BCaommission was that the City f¢ should not condone the sale of fireworks which has su& a dangerous �s2 -2- n U ea damage Rancho Cucamonga. commission also es ded veralalternatveforms of funding suggestepoolingresourcto complete larger more lucrative projects. While staff has no specific recommendation to Council, there are some alternatives which the Council may wish to consider to address this issue 1. Allow the three groups (Miss Softball America, Rotary, Sons of Italy) to have fireworks booths in 1980 and draw lots from a fireworks list of qualified service clubs for the remaining Iwo Consider repeal of the Ordinance after Jule 4. 1980. 2. Allow the three groups (Miss Softball America, Rotary, Sons of Italy) to have fireworks booths in 1980 and allow the remaining service clubs to jointly operate the remaining two booths and then repeal ordinance :. Repeal the Ordinance effective immediately 4. Continue the sale of safe and sane fireworks and evaluate the results at the end of each year 2ncoLrage the service clubs to educate the public of the dangers of all firamrks through a community wide campaign with posters, flyers, etc., and discouraging abuse. 0 1s3 .c - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer �:'" SUBJECT: North Town Street (lame Changes Sometime ago the Council initiated a study on the desirability of changing the names of 24th, 25th and 26th Streets to remove conflict with the over- all numbered street system. Because of Planning Commission's dissatisfaction with the proposed new names selected by the City staff, the Community was approached regarding suggested new names Hr Macho Gracia. CPAC representative for the area, arranged for the personal _ contact of apporximately 9M of the residents on the three streets The residents responded to the attached questionnaire The results of the survey were as follows • Agree with tare changes----- -- -------- - --- -- 18 Disagree with name changes ----------------- 36 Noopinion --------------------------------- 17 The reasons given for disagreement were as follows: No good reason to change ------------- - - - - -- 2 Change would create more confusion --- - - - - -- 3 Used to old names ------------------ -- - --- -- 8 Change would cause problems with legal papers. etc ------------------------- - - - - -- 8 Old names have "orior" rights -------- - - - - -- 8 No reason stated --------------------- - ----- 7 No suggestions were made as to appropriate rew names While the reason for objecting to the name change, appear valid, the original proposal's merits still stand For this reason as well as the 50'.-50% split on the opinion poll, it is recorrended that the Council proceed with a public hearing using the names Feron Onulevard and tic KInley Street as a starting m point The attached correspondence and infoation from past Planning Commission meetings will provide you with the exact name change proposals and additional details A resolution of Intent to Change Street flames is attached for your approval LBH:cd ® Attachment C i v 1i STREET HAIIE PROfEnURE 1 Resolution of Intent to change street names 1qy City Council) • A. Refer to streets) by name and refer to map on file in City clerks Office B. Fix time and place of public hearing not less than 15 days later C Publish and post 1. Notices posted 300' apart along street 2. Post. publish and mail 10 days before hearinn 3. Ilotices to state passage of resolution and hearing time and date 0. Affidavit for proof of posting 2 Hearing 3 Resolution giving new names 4 Notify agencies and residents ?-5 n !-1 LJ ( :11% ()1' R \N(:I10 CLICANIONGA September 5, 1979 Hr tlachn Gracia 10364 wunibolt Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Hr Gracia As you know, the City has been Irorktnq tottard the chnnnrnq or the names of 24th, 25th and 26th Streets to eliminate the conflict with the rest of the numbered street system In the City The process will require a public hear Ing to debat^ and aquae upon the final choices of names An initial choicn, based on the names of nearby streets, was presented to the Planninq Commission on ;uly 11 The Commission was dissatisfied with tl•e choices and requested that the community itself recommend the nines Ilould you be able to assist ns in tbis Imttr, by cnnfer, inq with the app'opriate Community epresentatives and recn mrnJing ranr, for Pre- sentation to the Commission and City council' As stated. any names would be adopted by the Council only after public hearings A copy of the City's initial rhoices and a vnnn to the flaming CtnmisSion are attached for your rel'CIVIce Please conto,t re at 989 -w51 if you have any questions Sincerely, arm IInelllt DL'rCLn111111T DEPART11ERr EIIGIIITERIIIG PIVI�I011 r r � Pm Aa5•n isle tanlinrrr PAR:drb cc 0111 Halley Inh 1 1141 11 1 fill, n, , , •. ,,. 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOPOA MEMORAIIDUM DATE: July 11, 1979 TO: Planning Commission FRO>1: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGES Pursuant to a request by the City Council, three streets in the "North Tow11" area are proposed for name changes These streets are now designated 24th, 25th and 26th Streets and are situated Setween 8th Street and 9th Street. This discrepancy in numbering is ve,., confusing to visitors and could result in a delay in emergency responses Even though the streets are heavily occupied and a name change will cause - considerable inconvenience to residen's and Plblic agencies, the elimination Of confusion will outwelght the inconvenience. The names proposed by the Engineering Division were obtained by the methoJ used for most new street names by developers and the City - extensions of the existing streets most nearly in line with the 'new- streets As the attiched correspondence shows, the new name suggestions were submitted to representatives of the affected community and no objections were voiced. The City Council is already concerned about and in favvr Of this proposal, but Is interested in any suggestion; to Commissioners mly have. Ilso attached for your information is the public hearing procedure used Respectfully su mltted, C��1zCMubbs — L? d O Hubbs City Engineer LBH VAR-deb Attachments: victutty tlap�,, Letter trm Naaho Carcia dated April 11, 1979 Street Name Procedure IT121 "E" 0 L n wity or RANCI -IO 'UCAI✓10NGAq April 11, 1979 Nacho Gracia 10364 Humbolt Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Street Name Change Hr Gracia: Nacho, the City Engineer's Office is prepnting a package to go to City Council shortly regarding the changing of various street names throughout the City where confusing situations exist Among those suggested for change are three within your community 1) 26th Street changed to tic Kinley Street; 2 ) 25th Street changed to Jersey Boulevard; 3 ) 24th Street changed to Feron Boulevard Do you have any thoughts on these proposed changes? If you or any of your neighbors have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call Thanks Cordially, William L Holley, Director Community Services Department WLH /es cc Attachment 1 map James C Frost, flavor Paul Rougcau, no att Chrano POST OrricE nOX 741. RANrlln rt1G%tlnNf% C MFORNIA 11710 (714) 999d8S1 • s RESOLUTION NO 7? 94 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING iTS INTENTION TO CHANGE THE NAHES OF 240, 25th, AND 26th STREETS. WHEREAS, it has been found that the number names of 24th, 25th, and 26th Streets are in conflict with the established numbered street system in the City; and, WHEREAS, emergency services personnel need to be able to detenaine street locations without hesitation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows SECTION 1. That the City Council hereby declares Its intention to change Vre names of 24th, 25th and 26th Streets as shown on Hap No N -001 on file in the Oftice of the City Clerk SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the T979 ni7:00 p.m , at 9161 Baseline, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as tFe time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed changes SECTION 3. That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to end conspicuously along the line of the street or part thereof proposed to be renamed at least 10 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three (3) signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height "NOTICE OF HEARING TO CHANGE STREET MAKE" SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shaIT attest to the same, and the City Clerk shell cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation tiblished In the City o_T_ ta�California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of _, 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST: yor !V City Clerk Cc Southern Callfom /a Edtaon Company Esc- U,1 f. ...O[i ... [.. November 8, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Lauren Wasserman Gentlemen: The California Energy Commission (CEC) has released its preliminary demand forecast entitled, *California Energy Demand 1978- 2000.' The peak demand forecast, which is part of the CEC legislative - and&to, is a crucial projection since it is is the principal determinate of the need for new generating capacity. The CEC Staff forecast of peak demand growth in the area served by the Southern California Edison Company is 1.49 per ann= for the planning period 1978 -1990. This contrasts sharply with Edison's forecast for the same period which is 3.1% annual growth. Should the CEC Staff I forecast be adopted and used to strictly determine the need for additional electrical energy, it would prevent Edison from constructing any additional conventlal prder plants during the 1980'x, other than those already unde.^. construction. Edison foresees that this will bring about a severe capacity shortage beginning in about 1985. We are of the opinion that the forecast is not in keeping with adequate energy supplies, and as a result there would be an adverse impact ou the health, safety, and welfare of the people of California. The officers of your organization and your interested members are encouraged to make their views on this matter known to the CaV fornia Energy Commission. Attached is information that can assist you in understanding our ( City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 • Nov. 8, 1979 concern over the Biennial Report now being heard before the Stato Energy Commission. Since all of the public haaringa on the CEC forecast are currently scheduled to be held in Sacramento, we recommend you send your written comments to: Secretary of the Commission California Lnorgy Commission 1111 Howe Avenue, Room 313 Sacramento, CA 95825 Thank you very much for your time in making yourself aware of this important issue. Sincerely yours, R. W. Bon es Area Manager RVIB: mb • Attachments IF-2 • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON "S CRITIQUE OF THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION STAFF'S DEMAND FORECAST As part of its legislative mandate, the California Energy Comm.sslon ( "CEC ") is required at the beginning of every odd - numbered year to adopt a forecast of the future demand for electricity for California's major utilities, both annual energy sales and yearly maximum peak load This adopted fore- cast is then used to judge the need for new power plants which must receive certification from the CEC As a basic input to this process, Southern California Edison and all other major California utilities submitted fully docu- mented forecasts for their own service territories in the spring of 1978 The GEC's adoption of a forecast is the subject of a public hearing process which is scheduled to conclude December 14, 1979 At the end of August, the CEC staff released its long awaited preliminary demand forecast, entitled California Engrg Demand 1978 -2000, A Preliminary Report For tie Southern California son Company's service territory and thoso of its resale titles, the forecast of peak demand growth in this report is 1 4% per annum for the planning period 1978 -1990 This con- trasts sharply with Edison's own forecast for that period of 3.1% annual growth The peak forecast is a crucial projection since it is the principal determinant of the need for new generating capacity The difference between the forecasts of Edison and CEC staff is critical I1 the staff's forecast is adopted and used to strictly determine the need for power. I would prevent Edison from adding any conventional power plants In the 1980's, other than those already under construction Edison foresees that this will bring about a severe capacity shortage beginning in about 1985 All parties agree that forecasting the need for electricity 10 years down the road is inherevtly uncertain. It is, never- theless, absolutely necessary in the electric power industry because plants require that long to plan, to obtain all the necessary permits for, and then to build. The adoption of a forocast involves more than just grinding numbers through computers The past reveals certain patterns in the way the electricity use of households, shops, and factories is influenced by such things as increasing popula- tion, rising incomes, changing family structure, and the rising j.-ices for electricity and natural gas A judgment must be made u.. to whether these patterns will continue and what now influences w.11 como into play Forecasting is a combination of science and juug- -nt, therefore, it is necessary to examine the consequences of forecasting errors on either the high or low side 173 -2- Table 1 below compares the annual percentage growth rates for sales to major customer classes, total Edison Sales, and Edison area peak demand Various historical periods and the 1978 -1990 forecast by Edison and thb CEC staff are portrayed Southern California Edison's forecast is developed in a straight- forward manner The historical sales of electricity to each of six clauses is analyzed separately* residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, public authority, and resale Residential, commercial, and Industrial are each forecast by . developing an econometric model of the way personal income, gross state product, electricity prices, and natural gas price have Influenced sales in each sector over the past thirty years, and then adjusting the outcome for newly emerging influences such as Edison's programs in the Conservation Voltage Regulation Pro- gram, Time of Use Rates for Large Customers, and the Appliance and Building Efficiency Standards promulgated by the state and federal government The driving force behind the Edison forecast is the assumption that Southern California is an attractive place to live and will continue to draw people to the area A mobile, skilled labor force attracts modern industry and the rising personal income attracts commercial businesses Higher electricity and natural gas prices, caused primarily by OPEC oil price hikes since 1973, have adjusted, but not broken, linkage between economic a tivity and energy consumption. Whereas historically a 1% increase in overall economic activity gave rise to a 2% increase in elec- tricity usage, now the same jump in the economy yields a 1% rise in electricity sales. The general explanation which the CEC staff puts forward for their low forecast is the development of what they call "end - use forecasting " Instead of forecasting the residential and ,ommerclal classes as wholes, the forecasts are developed on the basis of individual end -uses of electricity and natural gas In the residential sector, there are 27 basic end -uses such as air conditioning and refrigeration, and a further breakdown by climat', zone !"to 317 end -uses In the commercial Table 1 Growth Rate Comparison Historical Forecast 1978 -90 Past 12 CEC Differ- 1973-78 1974 -78 Months Edison Staff once Residential 2 6 4 2 7 1 2 3 2.0 - 0.3 Commercial 2 2 4 9 3 1 6 4 1 0 - 4 4 Industrial 0 3 1.7 4 4 3 4 2 3 - 1 1 Total Edison 1 3 2 9 4 2 3 6 1 7 - 1 9 Edison Area Peak 2 9 4 3 4 1 3 1 1.4 - 1 7 Southern California Edison's forecast is developed in a straight- forward manner The historical sales of electricity to each of six clauses is analyzed separately* residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, public authority, and resale Residential, commercial, and Industrial are each forecast by . developing an econometric model of the way personal income, gross state product, electricity prices, and natural gas price have Influenced sales in each sector over the past thirty years, and then adjusting the outcome for newly emerging influences such as Edison's programs in the Conservation Voltage Regulation Pro- gram, Time of Use Rates for Large Customers, and the Appliance and Building Efficiency Standards promulgated by the state and federal government The driving force behind the Edison forecast is the assumption that Southern California is an attractive place to live and will continue to draw people to the area A mobile, skilled labor force attracts modern industry and the rising personal income attracts commercial businesses Higher electricity and natural gas prices, caused primarily by OPEC oil price hikes since 1973, have adjusted, but not broken, linkage between economic a tivity and energy consumption. Whereas historically a 1% increase in overall economic activity gave rise to a 2% increase in elec- tricity usage, now the same jump in the economy yields a 1% rise in electricity sales. The general explanation which the CEC staff puts forward for their low forecast is the development of what they call "end - use forecasting " Instead of forecasting the residential and ,ommerclal classes as wholes, the forecasts are developed on the basis of individual end -uses of electricity and natural gas In the residential sector, there are 27 basic end -uses such as air conditioning and refrigeration, and a further breakdown by climat', zone !"to 317 end -uses In the commercial -3- ' sector, there are S end-uses such such as ands restaurants, ng and ventila- Lion, and 11 building g types which with climate zones yields 264 end -uses In the industrial sector, the CEC staff has also disaggregated according to the typo of product on a two -digit SIC code basis Logically, this approach has an appeal because this is a closer approximation to the way electricity is actually consumed, is There is still the fiction of postulating ideal types, the form of the "average" air conditioner ratheruthan fothe ting "average" residential customer Obviously , requires the gsupportgseveral huge hundreds for forecasts instead of a statistically or t the f task eof understanding or checking rthe basis the t forecasts much more difficult This and -use data Is not collected as s normal part of the metering and billin ro ly onsassumptions about thow dpatterns all forecasting of past electricity usage will or wi not be repeated in the ll future End -use forecasting requires n new class of assuvptions in order to get a picture of the Past The CEC staff forecast report does not contain year -by -year figurss in the hundreds of end -uses in each customer class Full documentation is scheduled to be available soon Until that information is available, it if iimpossible to / expl%itly on , recGSCS'Zirf -�_ / The forecast of California's future need for Commission lectricity which is adopted by the California Energy important impact on the health, safety and welfare of the sted people of this state and to the state economy the by hrwriting to o make 0 Secretary of the commission f California Energy 1111 Howe Avenue, Room 313 Sacramento, California 95325 Hombers of the nublie who do not become participants may still present their views. suggestions and recommendations by moans of oral comments in person at scheduied workshops and hearings or by written comments to the above address The CEC has a Public Advisor to assist interested persons in participating in e6 ll free (800) br852-7516hono number is (916) 920 -690 or, to 5 RESOLUTION NO 79 -98 A PESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAt10NGA, CALIFORNIA, TO THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION. WHEREAS, it has coin to the attention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. that the California Energy Commission Staff is n C annual growth peak electric power da d of 1.4X for Southern California the yeas1978throug 990 . this forecasted less than, the WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga believes rate of growth to be inconsistent with, and considerably City's recent growth trends and. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is also concerned that restricting the growth of electrical power can adversely affect present and fuiuhea safety economic conditions and cnuldt.lave a ,severe impact of the general NOW THEREFORE. be it resolved that the City of Rancho Cucamonga herby reuess the the e basisQandt reasonableness iofE the 9CommissionoStaff 's)preliminar analyze y ID forecast for electrical power growth within our area and (2) as%ure the citizenry of the Lity of Rancho Cucamonga that sufficient energy resources to be livinglfareall concerned. to promote PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST is ty er N yor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNCA • MEMORANDUM Date: November 21, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack I=. Director of Community Development Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING CQ4RSSION DECISION REGARDING RESOLUTION NO. 79 -09 FOR PARCEL HAP No. 4773 • RORTEPETdR Attached, please find the letter of Appeal from the applicant's attorney. After a number of meetings with the applicant and his attorney, staff worked cut whit we believed to be an amiable compromise. In meeting with the applicant, be expressed that it was his desire to divide the property only for tax Purposes and not for develooment. In light of this fact, staff amended the conditions of approval to waive the requirements for improvements until the duvelopment of La 2. The applicant's attorney at the time of the Planning Comission meeting insisted that Government Code, Section 66411.1 did not all" the City to require Improve - manta beyond the IL-its of the lots created. Specifically, the attorney was referring to the condition of approval that required a 26' vide paved access from Etiwanda Avenue to the eastern property line of Lot 2. id:at the attorney's letter does not state is that the full quote of that sentence of the Government Code Section. It is as follows: "Whenever a local ordinance requires improvements for a division of land which is not a subdivision of 5 or more lots such regula- tions shall be limited to the dedication of rights- of-Way easements It was the Planning Commission's opinion that reasonable off -site improvements is a 26' wide paved access from the eastern proper[, `ice of Lot 2 to Etivaeda Avenue This is in lice with the Planning Cacmlssim policy and Council policy. Further, Chapter 4, Art is I, Section 66474 requires that a legislative body of the City or County shall deny approval of a final or tentative map if it makes any of th• following findings: a. 'eat the proposed cap is not consistent with the applicable general and specific plans b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable &metal and specific plans. c. That the site is cat suitable for the type of development. !Y d. That the site is not suitable for the proposed density of the development. e Thet the design of the subdivision of the proposed improvements are likely to "use substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or •1ldlife or other habitat. f. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is likely to "use serious public health problems. g. That the design of this subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alter- native easements for access or use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to one's previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by Judgement of court or competent Jurisdiction and no authority Is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. _ It is our belief and the belief of the Commission that if the 26' width of pavement in not required as a condition of approval at the time of development of Lot 2, that the City must deny the parcel map based on the following findings: I. That the site is nor physically suitable for the type of development. • 2. That the site is met physically suitable for the proposed density of the development. It is the Planning Comisslon'• opinion that the conditions as revised ere reasonable and equitable and that the lack of a paved access to Lot 2 at the time of develop- ment mould be contrary to past City policy and would constitute a denial recmmenda- tion for the Parcel Nap. RRCOMENDATTON: It is recommended that the City Council deny the applicants appeal upholding the Planning Comissfon'a decision. Ras�egf�a..., b, _ Coou lopment -- ]L:BMI:nm Letter of Appeal Attachments: Kenai% Commission Minutes Planning Commission Staff Report `J CAROL B. TANENBAUM CLAMMN r. C•�-FOKN"GV„ November 5, 1979 The Honorable Mayor Frost and Members of City Council P 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9173C CITY CF &:rlCh*o CCCl4Bv,�CA ac ;,;�risrH.,nero PIJV Q 6 1979 .ti 7i8j91mrllrprlrZr8r9r5 6 . 1. Re Agenda of City Council Meeting for Wednesday, November 21, 1919; AFPEAL OF DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 79 -09 ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 24, 1979. _ Dear Mayor Frost and Members of City Council: On July 30, 1979 1 wrote to you on behalf of my clients, Mr. and Mrs Gary Kortepeter of 13053 23rd Street, Etiwanda, • California. I requested clarification of conditions imposed by Resolution 79 -09 adopted�y -the Cucamonga Planning Commission on February 14, 1979 The matter was referred back to the Planning Commission and resulted in a modified Resolution 79 -09 which was adopted on October 24, 1979. r 41 My clients, Mr and Mrs Gary Kortepeter, appeal the Resolution as modified The appeal is based upon the fact that certain of the conditions required by Resolution 79 -09 as modified are arbitrary, capricious, impossible of performance and in direct violation of Government Code Section 66411.1. We respectfully request City Council to consider our appeal at the earliest possible date. Resolution No. 79 -09 dated February 14, 1979 and as amended October 24, 1979 remain identical in Section 1 and Section 2. We have no objections to nor do we appeal the first two - thirds of the reso7u t% n ear as passed or as amendeprab%m lies with Sect on ° which sets forth the conditions and /or exactions to be me; by the applicant Under California case law and statute, the conditions and exactions must be capable of performance by the subdivider (Munns v. Stenman, 152 Cal.App. 2d 543, 552) and in cases where five or fewer Tots are beino created the improvements required by the city must be limited to ...the parcels being created.' (Government Code Section 66411.1). M Page 2 The Honorable Mayor Frost and Members of City Council Re: Resolution No. 79 -09 Kortepeter • Following many discussionsand meetings with the City, Planning Commission Staff agreed to the removal of one condition which required concerted action by others over which the applicant had no control and which condition was therefore violative of Nunns v. Stenman, supra.. In very serious efforts to com- promise with staff, Mr. Kortepeter offered to provide certain improvements which the law does not require him to provide. In particular, he offered to pay for the cost of engineering plans for the entire stretch from Etiwanda Avenue to Lots 1 and 2 The Commission Staff readily accepted this provision and other compromise offers of Mr. Kortepeter, but in its recommendation to the Commission Meeibers it still requested approval of con- ditions which would ultimately burden the applicant directly or indirectly with the entire cost of paving and relocating any public utilities which are not, `for the parcels being created.. (Government Code Section 66411 1) The commission Staff advised the Commission Members at the meeting on October 24, 1979 that if the Commission did not approve Staff's proposed modification of Resolution 79 -09. then Staff would withdraw its findings that the proposed map and the design for improvements of the proposed subdivision are in conformity with required standards and as a result Mr Kortepeter would be left with nothing at all Considering the amount of activity and constructico going on in the area surrounding Mr, rortepeter for whict, n0 ism rbveme�nts nave been re u %ed by the City, such an action y tb he Staff i e. withdraw ng of previous findings) would be both arbitrary and capricious The mere division of one lot into two will not Increase traffic, the rUmber of people occupying the property or in anyway threaten the health.safety and welfare of the citizens of Rancho Cucamonga As a matter of fairness, I urge you to amend Resolution 79 -09 so that section 3 sets forth conditions which are reasonable, capable of performance by the applicant, do not require con- certed action over which the applicant has no control, and which are limited to - offsite and onsite in improvements for the parcels being created " (Government Code Section 664177). Attached tothis letter for vour consideration are some suggested conditions and alternate suggested conditions which meet the criteria set forth above • l Page 3 The Honorable Mayor Frost and Members of City Council Re: aes01 --tion No. 79 -09 • Kortepeter Thank you very much for your attent on to this matter. Very truly yours, ' CAROL B. TANENBAUM, Attorney for Gary Kortepeter Encl: Proposed Conditions cc: Jack Lam, Director of Planning Loren Wasserman, City Manager and City Clerk Samuel Crowe, City Attorney John Mikels, Michael Palumbo Phillip Schlosser Arthur Bridge Is CBT:rsh /da ' Attachment to letter dated November 5, 1979 To: The Honorable Mayor Frost and Members of City Council Re: Resolution No 79 -09 - Kortepeter PROPOSED CONDIT1911S FOR 4) SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION 79 -09 1. An offer of dedication of 30 feet 'or street purposes Shall• be made on Lot 1 and Lot 2 and recorded with the final map. 2 Applicant shall provide a lien agreement for a ten (10) year period for street improvements along the frontage of Lots 1 and 2 on the frontage of 23rd Stree'.. 3. The city Engineer shall make the determination pursuant to Section 66436 (C -1) of the Subdivision Map Act of the division and development of the property will not unreasonably Interfere with the free, and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easements. The signature of any public entity or unility may be omitted from the final map and written notification of obje ^tions Is not filed with the City within the time limits s,ecified in Section 66436 (C -1) 4. The developer shall meet all final map requirements of the City Including, but not limited co, Provid4ng traverse cal- culation sheets, copies of recorded maps .+md deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division tie notes and bench marks that are reforenced thereon S. Ail requirements of the Foothill Fire District shall be complied with 11 /0/ PARCEL ER MAP N0. 477] - RORTEPET - Request for clarification Cf conditions imposed on sub;ece parcel map located 870' east of Etivands Avenue and 950' north of Summit Avenue. I Lloyd Hubbs. the Comissionitrmendg Resolution lNo. 7949 esf suggested latthe staff ozc f rep at Chairman Rmprl asked for commts trnn the awlimce. Carol Tanenbaum, Attorney for M:• iorcepater, asked that additional voiding for clarification be added to candlline I1 and 1] listed in the staff zapoof fee uked ttw =oo ce iha331be made onntoczl ■ndbLoI 2trnd recotddtvlth th0, 03 be 71-rz Pa�She fact asked for e�ovidalallUChn oenstzuetsnnplane a ED wsdei as fo71„vst The APP licont ahall P r width of prvement prior to for drainage nod street iaprovammts for chn 26 Englnear the recordation of the Lial map mad On the satisfaction of the u[or roblu from Etiwanda Awnuo to the e� et Lur 2• Shs Ina of the their that P proper Sin. of Lot 2 shall with the stab raFezc ac [hL tire is the lasistmpr pe the Cig1 that 26' w! antee along with the relocation cost of any paved acems [ram E[lvanda Aveaua m the cistern p P be Los at the low owner's w" elms would be unfair &M arbitrary. public utilities. Such a ,within he thin rt be changed the frnh- She asked that Conditiona1l! o agreement c[or m et improvements along Applicant shall ? iya the rn to the a and age of Lots 1 and 2 on the frontage of 47rs1onrsuggeK suggesting rn to the above changed, she submitted a germ to the Coemela Reeoluciom No. 19 -09, deletion of certain conditions within the currm= condition O1 and Mr. Rubbs indicated h does not sea a problem vit6 sevlour Sed b and . I Commission have [o mnka certain findings before ■ Parcel /] as indicated by Mrs. Tanenbaum. Ra indiated under out subdiviaia°° acre, tho City Log chose are that ve design and proposed improvements tap is approved. AwnB met Iikeopinion "a environmental danger warden ttbe able ebto be mad° without ethery• and can not accept taf conditions , ni dated in the salt report. H^ stead he Is s mgreement c the slog conditions l ist indicated "to- se hat bmemo meeo only, Commissioner Garcia asked if is viii be almost impossible for the applicant to make the icprcvemttd As required by staff. spot= Mr. tam stated the condition 02 which Mr. Rort'litio ap opposed to to, does roc plan any undue burden upon Hr. Rortepater. The ,oat Scion applies he the development of Lot 12 and net LotOeed acrthUrtimeter s a[ore,Ceon paved access hwill be required wil this lac far cu wrD until develOPmnnt of Lot 02 Thuiirrequirement e tine of Lotb2 develaymmr. It is his of the finel map but will be raga ltcaat in every way possible. opinion staff has worked with the apP !t vas the lrtant to scup public access. That policy was In Mr. Mubbe stated when Resolution No. 79 -07 wag adopt the prolif armeion o[ lots cho[a�ioncandvupheld by the Council on several occasions. effect at the time of inwrpo L net allwtog conditions that are The City is tryst' to Protect the public safety Y unm fe std undesirable In order to divide and pramota note development no that property, these taprwemnncs Wend to be made* October 249 1979 • Planning Commission Minutes ji ") Commissioner Dahl indicated what concerns him is that there have been bouses In this area built recently or currently under construction that this condition did not apply to. He does not feel it is fair to require this as a condition of the parcel map when others in the same area hnva not been required to comply with the same condition. Mr. Rogan seated the homes which Commissioner Dahl L speaking of were approved under the jurisdiction of San Bernardino County. Any developments approved by the City would be requireu to nest the some conditions as Mr. Lortepeter. Commissioner Dahl stated he would like to personally state that be appreciates staffs' working •tth Mr. [nrtepater to try to wort toward a compromise on this parcel map. Be dos set want to appear that be is against what staff to doing. However, he does believe it is an unreasonable burden placed on an individual. A motion was made by Commissioaer Hempel and seconded by Commissioner Tolstoy that Resolution No. 79 -09 be amended deleting Conditions 1 -11 of Sectlan 2 and replacing them with Conditions 1 -10 as listed in the staff report. Condition 01 and 07 to be amended as follows: 1. Au irrevocable offer of dedication of 30' for street purposes shall be made on Lot 1 and Lot 2 and recorded with the Final Forest Map. 2. The applicant shall provido all the construction plane for drainage and street improvements for the 26' width of pavement prior to the recordation of the final map and to the satisfaction of the City Fort- note from Etivanda Avenue to the and of Lot 2. AYES: REMPEL. TOLST'Of, CaRCIA DOES: DAHL ABSENT: JONES a e e a a C , J Ptaming Commission Minutes 103 October 26, 1979 CITY or RANCHO C' AM MIA STAFF REPORT DATE, October 24, 1979 TO, Planning Commission FROM, Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUBJECT, PARCEL MAP HO. 4773 - EDRTEPETL'R ABSTRACT. As the Commission will recall, this item came before you approximately six weeks ago in order to resolve some of the conditions of approval which the appli- cant felt he could not meet. Staff has met with the applicant, his Engineer and Attorney, to seek a resolution of the problem. Attached. please find Rasolution No. 79 -09 approving Parcel Map No. 4773 The conditions of approval which the applicant finds unaecaptable or in his opinion is not able to meet are condition 41 and 4 -8 The applicant has suggested that condi- tions 2 and 3 be reworded w that he may provide a bond to do the street work on Lot 1 and 2 frontage or provide cash in lieu of the bond AJditionally, the applicant indicates that he will prepare street plans within 300' of either side of the •property or street plans from his property to Etiwanda Avenue, whichever is Wore acceptable. In meeting with the applicant, he expressed that it was his desire to divide the property only for tax purposes, not for development. In light of this development. staff feels that for the applicant to meet the conditions of approval prior to recording the Final Nap might be an undue hardship or burden upon the applicant since no development is mnt=plated at this time. We auqgost that the Rssolution be amended as follows, 1) An irrevocable offer of dedication shall be made on Lot 1 and Lot 2 and recorded with the Final Parcel Map. 2) At the time of development of Lot 2, a 26' vide paved access frm Etivands Avenue to the eastern property line of Lot 2 shall be installed at the Lot 2 ownar's expanse A lien agreement prepared by tho applicant to the satis- faction of the City Engineer shall be provf1id and recorded with the Final Map to guarantoe the 26' wide paved access instillation at Lot 2 owner's expense. 3) The applicant shall provide all the constmetlon plans for drainage and street improvements for the 26' width of pavement prior to the recordation of the final map and to the satisfaction of tho City Engineer 4) Sanitary severs ani wstor systems shall be designed and coordinated with the Cucamonga Cowry Water District standards ® 5) The owner of Lot 2 shall coordinate and pay where necosoary for the relocation of any public utilities at the tine of construction of the 26' width of pavement. 104 ITEI 'k" 6) The proposed subdivision shall met the provisions of Zone D of the National Flood Insurance Program. 7) All requiremnts of the Southern california Edison and Southern California • ees Company shall be eat. 8) The City Engineer shall sake the determination pursuant to Section 66436 (r. -I) of the Subdivision Nap Act of the division and development of tae property will not unreasonably intsrfare with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easements. The signature of any public entity or utility my be omitted from the final map aryl written notifi- cation of objections is not filed with the City within the time limits specified in Section 66436 (C -1). 9) The developer shall seat all final mp requirements of the City including, but not limited to, providing traverse calculation sheets, copies of recorded mps and deeds "ad as refs_wnca and /or shoving original land division tie notes and bench marks that ara referenced thereon. 10) All requirements of the Foothill Fire District shell be cxTlied with. It is our fooling that with the revisions on the conditions that are suggested above, the applicant would have little or no development oriented cast involved in recordlnq his Final lisp. PIrM- MNDATION, It is reco®anded that the planning Cemission amend Resolution No. 79 -09 as suggested herein. Respe tfully tted. 0 / Jack actor of Community Development JL,BAI,te Attachments, Resolutio. So. 79 -09 0 1a5 IC t x ?)"wnq Qovx�ixto s RESOLUTION NO �i9 -09 • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAONGA PLANNING COK4ISSION APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 4777 TO DIVIDE 1.9 ACRES OF LAND INTO TWO TATS LOCATED 850' EAST OF ETIVANDA AVENUE AND 950' NORTH OF SU7011T AVENUE IN THE R -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 30th day of November, 1978, a formal appli:ation was filed with the City Planning Division; and WHEREAS, on the 24th day of January. 1979, the Planning Commission held a meeting to consider said project and continued to February 14, 1979. follows: NOW. THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUNNING COMISSION resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1 That the proposed map is consistent with the proposed General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. - • 2 That the design for improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 4. That the design of the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or other habitat. S. That the design nor the type of improvements fa not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6. That the design or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. SECTION 2: That this land division will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on February 15, 1979 SECTI0:1 1: That Parcel Hap He. 4773 is approved subject to the following ® conditiaen: /0� 1. 40' of dedication shall be made along 23rd Street from Etivands Ave. to Lot 1 and through Lot 1 and Lot 2; this access shall be paved with 26' vide paving from Etiwanda Avenue to Lot 1 and through Lot 1 to Lot 2. 2. Full street improvements shall be provided along the frontage of Lot 1 along 23rd Street. 3. At the time of development street improvements shall be provided along the frontage of Lot 2 along 23rd Street to the satiafacti,n of the City Engineer. 4. Developer shall coordinate and pay where necessary for relocation of any public utilities. S. Developer shall provide all construction plans for drainage and street Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6. Sanitary severe and water syst= shall be designed and coordinated with the Cucamonga County Mater District standards. 7. The proposed subdivision shall meet the provisions of Zone D of the National Flood Insurance Program. 8. All requirements of the Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Cos. shall be met. 9. The City Engineer shall make the determination, pursuant to Section 66436 (C -1) of the subdivision map act, that the division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easements. The signature of any public entity or utility may be omitted from the final map if written notification of objections is not filed with the City within the time limits specified in Section 66436 (C -1). 10 The developer shall meet all Final Nap requirements of the City Including but not limited to providing Traverse calculation sheets, copies of recorded map and deeds used as refercrce and /or shoving original land division, tic notes and bench marks that are referenced thereon. 11. All requirements of the Foothill Fire "!strict shall be complied with. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14711 DAY OF FESWARY, 1979. • PLANNING COIMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA 1�7 BY: Herman Rampal, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission is JACK LA4, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a tegular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of January, 1979. AYES: COMLSSIONMI HOES: CMRtISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L i S i + 'i • 1 • i; i� I - fi _• I i . J >°9 F :I Ir Allcp. ♦ r V e9y 1� 11 '�e JI +ll ai a�i i�Tt�Nr� =a 'a - »... ..�. ••- .- ice,... �. 1 ! r r4 iiI 09 �tl CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: industrial Assessment District 79 -01 Status Report Several months ago the Council approved the concept of looking into the development of an Assessment District for the construction of major streets and Utility services within the industrial area At that time the Council approved the concept of retaining Bond Council and Assessment Engineers, funded by Developers, to look into the feasibility of developing a major Assessment District Since that approval the Staff entered into agreement with MacKenzie Brown, a 6ond Council specializing in Assessment Districts, and Ron Martin and Associates as Assessment Engineers in the past few months the staff has had numerous meetings with Developers, Utility Companies and project engineers located in the area The scope of • the Assessment District and potential boundaries at have been defined, cost and a estimates developed for construction spread of those costs have been detemined for each parcel based on benefits received KI Attached for your revip:• is a copy of the prelimary scope of work and assessment distribution The studies have reached the point now where it becomes necessary to contact property owners in the area with the preliminary results By reviewing these results with each propert, owner we will be able to determine the percentage w111ing to participate in the Assessment District This will allow the Bond Counci- and Assessment Engineer to reanallze the boundary areas to determine if it is feasible to construct all of the work currently proposed and if not to adjust the boundaries and reduce the scope of work to involve only those property owners which have indicated agreement with the project This opinion pole will be taken in the form of a circulation of a petition This petition 011 be circulated by Developers actively pursuing the District formation. It is the purpose of this memo and Staff Report to inform the Council of the status of the studies to date and to make you aware that the petition will be circulated at this time f1-) Havember 21. 1979 cunt Page 2 The circulation of the petition in no Hay commits the City to any future action or involve any additional expenses All of the work done to date has been funded through a Trust Account orovided by Developers who are promoting the proposed project Many details are required to be worked out prior to finalization of any ple • Included are the precise alignments of Sixth and Rochester Streets. The Staff will be available at the Council Ifeeting to answer any further questiors that may arise in reviewing this preliminary information Respectfully submitted, submitted. Lloyd Hubbs Cit11 Engineer LH•cd Attachment • L ACCNCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCARO "GA PROJCCT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 79 -1 IUSTnucT Ions PETITION SIGNATUMS The petition herein is Prepared pursuant to the requirements of Divi- sion 4 of the Streets and highways code of the State of California, the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Pro- test Act of 19310. Section 2804 expressly provides that the provi- sions of Division 4 shall not be applicable when all of the owners of rare than 603 in Area Of the property subject to assaaament for said improvements have signed and filed with the Clerk or Secretary of t)re legislative body a written Petition for naid improvements and Waiver of said investigation proceedings [2804(3)). Note that the sigr.atures shall he by owners of asse3sable acreage. Said Section defines `owners of land" ns "those w e, at trc ti_a that said Peti- tion is filed with the Clerk, appear to be such upon the Assessor's Rill, or, in the case of transfers of land or any part thereof, appear to be such on the records in the County Assessor's Office, which the County Assessor will use to prepare the next ensuing roll. If any person signing said petition appears on said roll as an owner of property as a joint tenant or tenant -in- cocoon, or as a husband or .rife., said property shall be counted as if all such persons had duly signed." SUBDIVISION ItIPROVE?XNTS If the project is for the financing and improvement of streets or utilities under a subdivision condition and subdivision contract, the subdivider shall submit written evidence to the City Council that the total estimated amount of the proposed assessment will not exceed seventy -five percent (755) of •he estimated fair market value of the land proposed to be assessed after the proposed public improvements shall have been constructed. Also for subdivision assessment improvements, if the land to be assessed and subject to the assessment is encumbered or subject to any existing nortgage or deed of trust, the petition to be signed by owners shall also include any tlortgagee or beneficiary under any ezia�ng mortgage or deed of trust The property owner should also furnish at the time of snbnittal of the petition, any appropriate evidence showing the existence of all mortgages or deeds of trust and the names of any mortgagees or beneficiaries thereunder. F. MCKENZIE I0101 ^I Attorney at La.+ 1600 Dave Strcet, Suite 110 Newport Beach, California 92660 (711) 752 9025 ;.: ....4v'. ■J CERTIFICATE OF PETITION CIECULATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) cposas an says: -- —' being first duly sworn, I circulated the Potiticn accompanying thin affidavit within the territory shown on the attached Petition. Tine Persons whose signatures appear on said Petition are, to the best of my knowledge, owners of property within the boundary of the district proposed to be formed. Each nail all of said persons signed said petition in my presence. I IIEREDY DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT TIIE ADOvE IS TRUE AND CORRECT. Executed this day of California. , at 0 0 PETITIOII FOR T11L' f0:1STRUCfIOH OF INPROVEIIEIITS A" NAIVRR of ACOUTAFFiF:MTI' OF DIVISION d OF TNC STAGE=S AND 11ICIMAYE CODE. OF TIIE. STATC :,F r *tT,IPORIIIA. THE UNDERSIGNED, eonr.tituting property owners within the area of the property an shown an the plat Attached to this Petition, which property will be subject to the assessment for the improvements hereinafter rcgaaewtcd, hereby request the institution of proceed- ings under the "llunicipal Improvement Act of 17130, being Division 12 of the Streets and Ilighways Code of the State of California, for tlto construction of certain put•lic worts of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, described as follows: Tlae construction of certain street improvemants, including curbs and gu.ters, sower and water iaprovema•, , drai,lage structures, including undergroun- utiliLias, together with all appurtenancez and appurtenant work, including acquisition whore necog3ary in the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA in a npecial assessment district designated as Is ASSESS11ENT DISTRICT NO 79 -1 For further particulars, reference in maic hereto. to the Exhibits attached THE WDERSIGIIED consent to otht appurtenant work and acquisiticn that is, in the opinion of the City Council, necessary to properly said proceedings require improvements, d and alllimitationseunderpthe 'Special Assess- ment Investigation, Limitation and ilajority Protest Act of 1931", being Division A of tlae Streets and Highways Coda of the Stat¢ of California. tie hereby further request that all efforts and attempts be made so that said proceedings and the Resolution of Intention can be adopted at the carlieat time. This Petition may be signed in couaterpart and constitutes one PC-ti- and and Ilaiver, and nay be consolidated with similar petitions and waivers for similar improvements herein mentioned. FILED IN THE OFFICE OF 711C CITY CLEki: THIS DAY OF Said Petition represents _,.% of tlao assessable area, as shown on tine attached map. CIT CLF.ItH CITI OF RANCHO CUCAtIONOA STATE OF CALIFOI:IIA Above percentage verified this _ _ day of LWYD IIUDOS, CITY EN/TF1E1•R �— CITY OF RAIICHO CUCAttO'ICA SATE OF CALIFORNIA i nssrssmetrr 3i'[� "• !• `t'; ``.••r 1, a / I Ay SYS M �[kb a „1 a, 1Y i,I[r +-Mr id /sa/rrn l - ry, ,rte aa �t � • •�'7't��yj •I � �I F (Q1g ik,W�i� �t4 �:1 u�(�1e i'1! Qq, • ;f.a a ' i 3 K!�f a ? �.t• v`I. �TIJ14S���a �' I dy •i' 3 � \ 1 i. • • \•Y b J• tl < N . rl V 1 l �• ••. 1.�•�r urfl tb+l) Jr «nPIN 3•I }— - - /Oa olr+eY, rrrw • /J d� /^, I/Yr.I /1 NSA it :�` wrjj t � p� I .'.I1�I(/ F1� I f9 �I• ! `�`�1 . �, of ` I* w I IJ r • ��` � inbI i ti fill"� I' rx h •r 1' P r. r. Y/rI 1• .rra. r. .:/w I Rtl �" Mf }; Na.. p.r. `-e —v.;r •a F,a. ^. /Ii... rvr , `.•/1 I Y I �• �.•=.if. i /.I.. Y r ...• �rjF' aT J.y i��� `7; I 3nN3AV P^ 'D173A37J cgs) /•'�rraar,r ,� Ui ",I• II' I 4_ ;J ) .lye Q A y� 'jiltf l I I (1a YAIj • °.��� tlr Y '�'• eAl ! n I . � � 6 .: olf�• a •Z1.1 �91I •I Ct —�t ..a Yi?!SI �ma 9q) �5 • „�l1Lt� ; �e �1"'� �o ;„'I i °� oe ;�� �a •i L�C �_ ��L � I. -__._. I `. N .1�..�L�6.. � a,./s rr "1•'1 "ter r'��'� 'AN1�L -•.� -� er •[q r 1 F�IrrFg1[�FgIF 1lrNlq r��gl�1► Dsr�ONrFU R 1Rl I osr � �t v 3nVH M j� ILI (ill�'4 �nl E � /!••� to h ,•.,.c,c•. NOV 12Wo r s•uv � e r P - r.- + .I' =fw� J 1. +r n_ N •.••. ♦•• e Sr _ _ _ .rfi TI:Fa '•.sue .e•. . rw< <Rs:r.+ -+�.+ 2j_ DE—Al- _ I B•. Q�I •I nI 11I �. 1 Alu 9,Iil. C(V-rO. C•M. i !C .. 4ffe —•— \i. er ..lr •• - s. •r ..a sr. a 2I—..— ♦c+ .a -rt Wi :u.a.v.re caner o••, o.. +r/ ZI� .na.r_a r. r•- .....r J• f!. f • • • �. PAVP,'ST0 4SMSSAILI T MYNOM, — �.OTE.:a •� r !•r!!- •,. r. 'fro. oso ^rr •C fl.: ..l ♦ . •, . r n • f v -/ fs _ -- � -aa , r. !. s.v .�nro s:£ en •,tr. J9:r rv.• lw lrc - • e c• -+ s.r <l.r _�•. a -.r�r 'r.e C17) Of ReAY.c'O CUCAMONG.. _ rg e,�t?sEO�ssESSUrv�asrur ,•.,.c,c•. NOV 12Wo L� m h m m Z O m N t) e b LL N h Q b 41 N Q G m q t0 T d u QInT mm m q � lOm m N N am bNVf t0 •� C U binOr' Pm0` q N <M. W A ^PO -PN O•P Nb 6 Y-l• mPPIOmNPOO.Tm . -hhtTh bNhgmm♦•bmN dNq M ♦. O WNNNP PN ONCI CI mm101nmq ^bb NO]<AhOhq 1lll�/�bC')v•�N �1�f 'SIOGht:y t�1/V Pm.'Om OJ1h��t0 u` J14^^NN4 V)N4 4 V1m PPN mbm ^lObv OPhPV^ y 1 ads adbw<b a O cb 44-s sc 44 y a mb o�rbq - -mm ) � ah Pm egmb•nbb •s PmhmPJivo onh ( NmONPtO tph VPP ^J I•tOh QPh NmM OOPP Pr•hP !O QNN�mgvJf tpmm burp .Oh Q m ^NN OmV NmmNV1P .tJ f h ^ ^.- .•�mWN C)tO IO�NJ1 n nlOD PNm NgtO •�t0 •�PNp. -• �ZY mr•b♦•Vh•- ^<•f00 PJfmNNVtnh bNNNNhmbr••m lON NhOOPh -PWIOb Q P J•m �Jl� -.�^ NN h'O•�OmJ \N NNlnm bin •ON ^m )� Q m•�N• -• Q N mNg NP •�bt0 •-• m .N ^ •W •N N dd- O aaa� ¢a m v.-•- aLL ogoo ob W a LL OOV•• lD •� vPb bN ON OOOOb NObJ)Vfp O 1ff •� •"I InNNbmNb Nmh h pp hmb.- qh hh PPh QhQ POb PIAh PN h F•• p z)mP0 b0 WN♦ qQN NOOKNmQ mb Ulnm v m J (44 P^ lnW tp tp J)%lpNmP N ^-mWbNNb m P vh mN QO Q MOht'1 Nh tO IOb OPOOP• -I�NP OtO tOV m s .-am NtOmaM POaaNNmN N•- NNPNtp mnD�m m m yyN^ Oln y1 mP 1 m^�Y'� W O OmmO Ob O•JOOOOlOb00000000�0 LL O UOh^ Wh vONNCU.O tOMbNOtOg PO O V NO 100.0 N� t`l h ^. mtD bP - •- PJf •�q bmQ ONPm:V V)1(1Ph h Q b r- ♦. m m m .- P b P N 1(1 b ^ N N aaa (naaadeaoa•,,�ybbc�8dcb <pd64, bdbb¢ ^mI�UC`v bO Nbq Oln lnmb NO N lJ O ()m n^ f q )n• )U OPP�J'N°•DPNVP VVN9mN PhP Ot_OOh Om Pb b�Ohv N -Iflm P m NaO b O m m N Q p p P h h p h z - a emr. In to lnv Olv�J+l'in wino W t0 �NM rhh J)t0 N ^aaa aadaaan ♦v- ��h 66 �O m .-C M mNONm bmtvv COlnO b •� P : m DOO V' mOhvbObtO to P v C PO mNMln m.- OPgm♦ -N^ •D lD <a0000 o00 0 "Oiv m ^N vin ^Imm JJ tOV � v<•n b Ph <Tp --V V J)NMh NNOl) bOm( m �u••n1 IJJ�QGmPm Nbl�nPhOn •l J\ ^ •- m m m m mN Qm tOb O)tObmmr -fq Jl1n0ppJ` Y m P h O N O P P m v .) Q m O N cl m h 0 c nNr•m Nt.l- r•NmbNNq h ^Vfm Y U. P ••l t •LL)�I•u JJ•<J n'•n �n�O bN GhV bOblOy Naa ^aa ^NOaayaN-•- q ^vmP �mv Y m OJf mOON�ONmb.9 NQObO ^nN m mQ bV m•)b OQUbm Oh m0P•Dr � Q mP 00 OlVhmh minm ^O Qm.-N� •i v v N -^ m•nmmm me m^)v PmmbO SOP _ ^I A ^PO -PN O•P Nb O(^ q -WQ -gJaQ y M 6G' y 1 ads adbw<b a O cb 44-s sc 44 y a mb o�rbq - -mm � ah Pm egmb•nbb •s PmhmPJivo onh H N InPON ^ IT bN lDgO mhm hm lD0 b Y•• OmOm P lON NhOOPh -PWIOb Q • -O N�MP YEN OV Pqv N.- •'VbNV)D r• N NIO IOq •`v ^b OPNPNmNNP ^I O`QOb = bm Pm Ob N�v1nh P W dd- O aaa� ¢a m v.-•- aLL ogoo ob O no ObbbOOOOOpo 0 a LL OOV•• lD •� vPb bN ON OOOOb NObJ)Vfp O 1ff •� •"I InNNbmNb Nmh h tV P h P vh mN QO F N � V• b Nh Nh Vm Om b m 1^ �aaONOaybaOONayNm�J)b m yyN^ Oln y1 mP 1 m^�Y'� W al. 6 O m •� V NO 100.0 N� ll m Q N P b P N 1(1 b ^ N N ^ ONVO Cb ^mI�UC`v bO Nbq Oln lnmb NO N lJ O ()m n^ f q )n• � ? `•gbQ•"•Nh bNq minq `D .. •D `D dIDOmhPh NP•-NN OPP�J'N°•DPNVP VVN9mN •r •^ -Iflm Jf nYl �•- �p .n PN��^•�mn lU ^Vr�m•Dm�NQ. bt-`mm�hmo bbm q nI r'Cry ON h•^ <l1r mbm�m.- OVVmbNq Nei o<� ••• 1p •n "`)n <'p •D lD <a0000 o00 0 "Oiv <i V v<•n \f�m,u •`.NN .- �u••n1 IJJ�QGmPm Nbl�nPhOn •l J\ ^ •- m m m *YI •p• n�Y • - nNr•m Nt.l- r•NmbNNq h ^Vfm Y U. P ••l t •LL)�I•u JJ•<J n'•n �n�O bN GhV bOblOy O n • � NM• C)P.n `1UNhh OJ• Y, ` ^m ^OO mIO IONy ^nN vl f) ^N lrq•-+• n .<1- Nml•�.�hN<`•m- Nmarn•DhtlP['1 O W 6 M r• n CO t a O b N a O O N a O N n n W a N N v Q a P O t) O a T O O a v ^oo a nfN A N P.m a�cls alma a m rl +l v� Q n tJ i N ¢ u N� uNi�N tJ PTt7 ud w N 6 O n a a N u Q fb '••� N Y V o N a0 CIO_ P O C a LWLL Oarl al � N O_Vfa 1'1 L:LV ^On n LL r V a I VN W VI N N out W LL c H j LL N I P aI64 F LL 41 W a N a a nl W 11 P Q LL YIJ aa0 LL a w W T Cl Sw 00 �O Qu N uo Ina � z3LL anlvv n b N C [C V 41 u QW OON _m o i r W M O 9 OJ P a 1- a N _ O N ¢ u andCb Q o LL N a n U Q O n a a ^ u Q fb '••� OSLL a C o N a0 ',b mC P P O C a KLL a ¢ � N a a- r 0 LL N fb '••� 41 P O C a KLL O 6 N F a . out dWd+ LL c W I P aI64 F LL 41 W O r N a a 5 N N 11 W Q r 6abV c w J N A 1 ai a N C _ n 41 _ 1- 10 v N P N Il9 i M lW'J 6 8 CITY OF PWICnO CUCAIKHIrA ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 110. 79 -1 • DESCRIPTION OF WORK Tha general description of Bork consists of the cinstruction of certain grading, clearing and grubbing, asphalt concret= pavirg, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, concrete median curb, cross gutters, water mains and hydrants, sanitary sewer mains, storm drains and catch basins, highway lighting, median lands aping and irigation sy;tcos, anderground electrical, gas and communication Llility faciiities, includim• all appurtemances and appurtenant work, including the acq,isition of a'1 rece;sary rights -of -way necessary to accomplish tar above imirovements to the sp cifled widths aid dimension and all sail work and cauisitinn it lo-at.:o in del or a porric.n of the ,follow'ng li;tei street (unless as indi:aS+d helot) and as shown or the propose,. lounda•y map atta bed hereto 6th Street frnm haven A erne -o locheste Avenue . Excepting w.Rr main and hydrants 'rpm -'attn to Cle eland. Clevelard Avenue f•on 4tt StrE:t :a appro imately 1320 No or 6G Street - E.cept'ng st, eet imiroveien's on the west half of Cleveland frost atb Street to ?pproximatfly 4NO' no therly, ant cxcepti.ig water ma n and hydrants frog 4t. Street to ith Street Milliken :venue from 4th Street to ippro in tely 1300' We o` 6'h Stre,,t - Excf,ting sanitary sett r n in from :t i Street to 6th Street. Rochester Avenue (Realigned) 'iam 4t Street •o 6th Street Rochester AvLnue widentng ties si'e , my fro maligned 6th Street (7th street) to 80 Stre ^t 8th Street from Haven Avenue tc Ro,he ter Avet ie water main ano hydrants, only 4th Street fnr, Cleveland Avenue to Rochester ,venue water main and hydrants, only Easement midwa, 1 —hieen Haven 1vei,e ano Cleve], nd Avenue from 4th Street to 6th St -e.,t for stem d,ra.n fici'ities, TiY 12-6 CONSTRUCTION ITEM A. CLEVELAND STREET 88' Street 2 -12' Lanes B. ROCHESTER STREET 88' Street 2 -12' Lanes C. 6711 8 MILLIKEN 120' Street 2 -12' Lanes D. ROCHESTER (H. Side) E Storm Drain F. Sewers G. Water H. Utilities! Gas Electric Telephone TOTALS COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION COSTS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASHT. DIST. NO. 79 -1 CONSTRUCTION COST s. -S 285,950 (1) INCIDENTALS TOTALS $ 10.715 S 396,665 217,625 (4) 42,860 10,715 260,485 85,715 75.000 1 2.,800 (45) 482,174 75,005 3,059,643 490,805 415 31,500 (1) 10.715 42,215 462,000 (8) 85,720 54..10 A 560,050 (10) 107,150 667,200 1,075,150 (18) 192,868 1,268.018 101,448 ,1,210,883 525.000 $7,603,884 Estimated Acquisition R1W (Has not been included into the estimated spread cost to individual parcels) 100 $1,071.497 A ' M 101,448 1,210,883 525.000 $8,675,381 $2,713,440 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ASMT. DIST. NO. 79 -1 (6th ST. INDUSTRIAL AREA) ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST I: • r� A. 88' STREET: (Center 2 -12' lanes c.sted separately) CLEVELAND AVENUE 4th to 7th Streets 1. Excavation 6,750 cu. yds @ S 4.00 2. Pave, base and cone (full) 1,915 L.F. @ 53.00 3. Pave, base and cone. (1s) 1,900 L.F. @ 26.50 4. Street lights 3,665 L.F. @ 6.80 S. Catch basins 2 EA 03000 00 6. Connector pipe 76 L.F. @ 40.00 7. 1 -12' Lane 8. 2 -12' Lanes SUBTOTAL 13% INFLATION - 12% CONTINGENCIES ESTIMATED TOTAL: 1,900 L.F. @ 12.00 1,915 L.F. @ 24.00 SUBTOTAL 13% INFLATION - 12% CONTINGENCIES ESTIMATED TOTAL CENTER 12' LANES $27,000 101,495 50,350 24,922_ 6,000 3,040 $212,807 53,202 $266,009 22,000 45,960 $68,760 17,190 $85,950 S. 88' STREET (Center 12' lanes costed separately) ROCHESTER (realigned) 4th St. to 6th St. 1. Excavation 6,150 cu. ,ds 2. Pave, base, conc. 2.500 L F 3. Street lights 2,500 L.F. 4 2 -12' Lanes @5400 @ 53.00 @ 6.80 SUBTOTAL 135 INFLATION - 12% CONTINGENCIES ESTIMATED TOTAL 2,500 L.F. @ 24.00 135 INFLATION - 125 CONTINGENCIES ESTIMATED TOTAL 2 -12' LANES m $ 24,600 132,500 17,000 $174,100 43.525 217.6 5 60,000 15 ,000 $75,000 • it i .4 .4 C. 120' STREET (2- center 12' lanes costed separately) Milliken - 4th TO 7th ST and 6th ST. - HAVEN TO EXIST ROCHESTER I. Excavation 48,600 cu. yds @ S 4.00 2. Pave, base and cone. 13,360 L.F. @ 194,400 78.00 1,081,080 3. Median landscape 235,600 S.F. @ 3•� 4. Street lights 13,860 L.F. 706,800 @ 5.15 _ 79.695 SUBTOTAL $2,061,975 132. INFLATION - 12% CONTINGENCIES _ 515,494 ESTIMATED TOTAL $2,577,469 S. 2 -12' lanes 13,860 L.F. @ $24.00 332,640 13% INFLATIONI - 12% CONTINGENCIES _ _ 83.160 O ESTIMATED TOTAL 2 -12' LANES 415,800 R OCHESTER (Widen 20') 1400 L.F. X 20 - 28,000 S.F. X $0.90 S.F. 25,200 13% INFLATION - 12Z CONTINGENCIES 6.300 E. STORM DRAIN ESTIMATED TOTAL f 31,500 4th to 6th BETWEEN HAVEN AND CLEVELAND Open Channel or pipe 2,640 L.F. @ 140.00 369,600 • 13Z INFLATION - 12Z CONTINGENCIES 92.400 ESTIMATED STORM DRAIN TOTAL S 462,000 (R� 9 F. SEDERS: Unit cost reflects M H 's, etc. - in -place 1. CLEVELAND - 4th St. to 7th St. 1126,720 15" V.C.P 3,960 L.F. @ 132 00 2. 14ILLIKEN - 6th St to 7th St, 15" V.C.P. 1,320 L.F. @ 32.00 82,240 3. ROCHESTER (realigned) 4th St. 15" V.C.P. to 6th 2,640 St. L.F @ 32.00 84,480 4. 5. 6th ST. - HAVEN TO ROCHESTER 8" V C P. 6" V.C.P LATERALS 9,240 1,400 L.F. @ 20.00 L.F. @ 7.00 184,800 9,BOL SUBTOTAL $448,040 131 INFLATION - 121 CONTINGENCIFS 112,010 ESTIMATED TOTAL 1560,050 JR� G. MATER: Unit cost reflects valves. etc. in -Place 1. CLEVELAND - 6th St. to 7th St. 12" ACP 1,320 L.F. 2. MILLIKEN - 4th St. to 7th St. 12" ACP 3.990 L.F. 3. ROCHESTER (realigned) 4th St. to 6th St. 12" ACP 2,640 L.F. 4. 4th St. - CLEVELAND TO ROCHESTER 12" ALP 6.180 L.F. 5 6th St. - CLEVELAND TO ROCHESTER 16" ACP 6,680 L.F. 6 8th St. - HAVEN TO ROCHESTER S 22 00 $ 29,040 0 22.09 87,780 9 22.00 68.E 0 22.00 135,960 9 28.00 16" ACP 9,240 L.F. P 28.00 7 FIRE HYDRANTS 69 EA i 1,500.00 . SUBTOTAL 13% INFLATION - 12% CONTINGENCIES SUBTOTAL ) 187,040 258,720 103,SDO $ 860,120 215,030 $1,075,150 Water F the NOTE. Distr District the 11amnu t N: not beeenfdetermined cas ofa this nStudy- Ell H. UTILITIES GAS COMPANY 20,810 L.F. @ $ 3.90 $ 81,159 • EDIS04 CO. UNDERGROUND 20,810 L.F @ 46.55 a 968,706 GENERAL TELEPHONE 11,840 L.F. @ 29 43 - 525,000 SUBTOTAL $1,574,865 tQ% INFLATION - 7% CONTINGENCIES 262,466 ESTIMATED UTILITY TOTAL $1,837,331 IV E ll ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST • INCIDENTAL COSTS: S 172,450 1. Engineering (31 of 5,748,353) 18,200 2. soil testing 57,483 3. Preliminary surveying (11) 57,483 4. Construction surveying (11) 25,000 5. Assessment Engineering 50,400 6. Legal counsel 86,000 7. Inspection (City) (1y1) 8. Inspection (Water Dist.) (504 L.F. X 48,610) 24,300 98,412- 9. City Administration 10. Printing, advertising, notices, posting, eta 8,000 11 Bond printing and servicing ($100 X 200) 20,000 • 12. R/W appraisal and negotiation for acquisittln 20,000 13 Bond Discount (951 of $8,241,612) 433,769 TOTAL INCIDENTAL COST $1,071,457 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 7.603,884 ESTIMATED AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENTS $8,675,381 V] a b' M E M O R A N D U M Date November 15, 1979 it To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Ser•ices Cubject: Restricturtng of the Community Development Block Grant Program's Citizen Participation Advisory Committee from County function to City Function The Citizens Participation process requ_r^d by HUD for CDBG programs has been modified by the County Board of Supervisors to eliminate the Co ®ittees (C -Psc) from the County process The local C -Pac oat been a very useful asset to the citizens ideas which City affect providing "grass roots" reaction to projects, programs their neighborhood, which is p-lmarily the barrio of N rth Town While "officially" the only function of a CDBG C -Pac is to advile tte governing parks, etc what this perceives as needed community improvements, (curbs, guttors. committee can be 'unofficially" asked to react and give input in other areas. For example, when a group such as Basset- Barrio Council or ProjecthHOC- Pac Come eto be Council indicating they have the total backing of the community, asdifferentuper pectiveitocprogrimsnoperating vltFio thetbarrio than wecwouldshaveve without their input The "nuts and bolts" of C -Pac operation are not as rigid as most other types of standing cosmittees Specifically, they have no regular meetings, but are convened only whe. needed They generally are not strictly limited to a specific number on the eoa.9ittee, and terms of appointment are usually for one year It would be staff recommendation that the Council, by Minute action: ✓ ;, Continus the Citizen Participation Advisory Committee (C -Pac) concept; and, ✓ 2) Continue the tenure of the current Committee, listed below through July 1980 1) Nacho Gratis 4) Ramon Rodriguez 2) Catalina Hcntez S) Gedie Ross 3) iachel Ni:asio 6) Enrique Vasquez Request an agenea date of Nuvembor 21, 1979, to present this item for Council consideration is &ymv M/ I \J 5 RESOLTUION NO 79 -97 A REGOLTUION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C ?:'MRNIA, ESTABLISHING A LICENSE FEE FOR THE OPERATION 0 BINGO GARES WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve and determine as follows. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9C of the City of Rancho Cucamonga requires that a license fee be fixed by res„lution NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED oy the City Council that a fee in the amount of $50.00 shall be charged for the Issuance of a license to play bingo to the City ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk 130 yo —Ha r city of RANCHO CUCAMONIGA November 16, 1979 Mayor Ja7 I C. Frost City Ot Rancho Cucamonga p 0 Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 near Jim In any profession it is one's desire es achieve a position at the top of The FAA's Western one's field Ir the Air Traffic profession, the "op of the field" s becoming a radar controller at a Level V facility Region offers four Level V facilities, with two, phoenix and recently received the only or log ppsition at tic Clellans (Sacramento)wassuccessful, wo -d that my and I am to be transferred, effective tlarch 23, 1980. This selection P(yrfamilyYisleases me asdtandeis looktn9 forwardbtodour move tosnorthernn• California, even though we have throughly enjoyed our three plus years in Rancho Cucamonga. position As a result of this transfer •,ssionnandtltssassociatedresign D sit,o as on the citizens Nlvisory Conn residence in Chairman of the A'ta Loma sub- camnittee Although n0' rc thec tormiss on9reachlwell in of tFeefuture '�Inhorder�to the attain ebetter Ranchoi Cucamonga he members 'if than �esentlYSCan,d I hope to make vmy to resignation effective Jan 1980, as this will allow you and the Council ample time to fins: a rep lac ement• I cannot begin to eRpress my sincerest graditude o you and the Council learned much m athethepfr endships Iehaveydeveloped with tyourself. the ave Councit�amisettledfat my new residence members w11' remain long after Agaig thanl) Yr—. / Michael J. Zinkin M17 lk p= OFFICE BOX 793. RANC110 CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 91730 (714) 9894851 20 tlovember 119.79 fir Dan Nendryck, City Of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonpa, Ca ' e-ar fir Mendrv, k , I lone hr nt•t ,d 'hat f will be u•iablc to erve on Rancho (ucamonga'c Cilivens Advlsory Committee for the General flan While our apency continuer, to have surge tlono regar- ding, the proprecr of the- !)an. and while it is our intention to continue •i!.loliuc w•1'!, the City tnd its otnsultants, I canno, accept the invltntion of the Mayor to ,Join the Citizens Advisory Committee We will be watrhirp with anticipatlor a': you wind through the process for c ^nple: ton of the General Plan elements, and In particular the Mouslnl! Flonen! ..hi,h Is ^•o crucial to long range pol L•le to promote affordn'Ile housing for our cllent� Ar.d I an a Ailible for commert on any stage of the process involving homing- related land use matters, Cood luck to you In the crmpletlon of the General Plan; I look forward to reviewing the draft and final product for conslstentry with the needs of our clients and the require- ments of State law and regulations •thanK v..n for v ^n^ ••..n vtrin rot }nr in thta matter tcry Trujy Youts, (late Ro enberr linus Ing I au I r Jc. t too rd t vat or inland Count It - trp rl '.ervtre INLAND COUNTIF LEGAL SERVICES Srv,flnw•+r• t r• o:< 4� q.q v9r-•• • , )µ r vr"a..e... tm.u9) ..... 20 tlovember 119.79 fir Dan Nendryck, City Of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonpa, Ca ' e-ar fir Mendrv, k , I lone hr nt•t ,d 'hat f will be u•iablc to erve on Rancho (ucamonga'c Cilivens Advlsory Committee for the General flan While our apency continuer, to have surge tlono regar- ding, the proprecr of the- !)an. and while it is our intention to continue •i!.loliuc w•1'!, the City tnd its otnsultants, I canno, accept the invltntion of the Mayor to ,Join the Citizens Advisory Committee We will be watrhirp with anticipatlor a': you wind through the process for c ^nple: ton of the General Plan elements, and In particular the Mouslnl! Flonen! ..hi,h Is ^•o crucial to long range pol L•le to promote affordn'Ile housing for our cllent� Ar.d I an a Ailible for commert on any stage of the process involving homing- related land use matters, Cood luck to you In the crmpletlon of the General Plan; I look forward to reviewing the draft and final product for conslstentry with the needs of our clients and the require- ments of State law and regulations •thanK v..n for v ^n^ ••..n vtrin rot }nr in thta matter tcry Trujy Youts, (late Ro enberr linus Ing I au I r Jc. t too rd t vat or inland Count It - trp rl '.ervtre INTER - OFFICE MEMO - 1979 DATE November 20, FROM Thomas Cucamonga CaSheriff's Station HONE 989 -6G11 an TO Lauren Wasserman, City tfanager City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT Wayne Fanning Detoxification Center Under the authority of Penal Code Section 647(ff) a peace officer has the authority to place a person found in a public place who is under the influence of an intoxicating liquor in a place designated for "civil protective custody." In so doing, this person is then protected from any further criminal prosecution. From 5 people were9arrestedgfor being �drunk in public. of found that 95 people, 22 people required medical treatment or had addi- tional charges. Seventeen of those 95 people were violenout and 56 were the so called common drunk to show that 4.66 peop: qualified too bethousedhinothetWayne intoxication ww o u -b 4 Fanning Detoxification Center Attached Disorderly copy Conduct, whichic includes (ff) section,647, D '1W :Jes 'AA,4 C c- -♦ `i\� �i�"r%- -calrrYp tiro^ .r: a^ f+:!�T :'.E.Y�a :;1i.". ♦ `.5.,�". .°y^ r.. :a'�Y 1 ��a)±!�'• ipetSSeel.�- " 206 207 DhFRING'S PENAL §677 racrention.] R(cnnef Tan e mtanor Vo ] an) injured red r,on. mgt) and toabmmg liquor Aeog, Toluene, dung) ]n) prr,on, or any, such a (Ice t age of f). i ua Jer the age h m m ,00h n behalf , no behalf of any r any i m.) for rynann, mlerfrrn with or nhurb.ls or pre• person, for tens Ibe free ,1,e con m,rit % mn.me mrnt n may he he l the ante or use of rhnmsnphS relaling to the aph, of .-n) rowel, udr ,Salk, or other public way oreanm to he per. Wh for the accident -hich rnuhed m the Injury or4 death of su,h injured person (m t\'hcn a reraon his Sinialed suhdnl• pl,,enbon ch 224 § I framer An) per,^n tmLling any protninn of this ,rSl.on is of Inn (f) of Ihn ,c,oan. a peace ufr.... tf he is rci%on.hl) Ihle to do ,o, shall place the CIS 2431 Cal fur Id `"amts/ §17, Cmnmal jwIty a mtwaem "nor N 'Ling Perim, or ,auw him to be pl,red, in wd in this moon %hall prohibit a pn,nn. I•iher p"I"I to niv sp9 /7 cu,t dy Such person ,hall be than a public cmrfo)Le sung urt41n the Iaken to o L,Ilny, dr,lgnalrrt punumn to ,cope of his or her cmplo)mem, front of Balms be wed mllles.] It ,oh,lt. Ins the injured rnrwn's I , I,icy fur II a ,jl< Se,nnn WO of the We rlr, and In ilunrns Clde, fi, the It hour tram S n I. rxful the intent, or r•n the a vac of Such "holograph, lint .h b94 § 7 1976 .h :9) 411 m r,l etalua- Sinn of n,<bi.at -a A I, rte o•h.c, .nay place s wit Ilion• n •.�Jc for w11, i1 IM1e 1. •, rs ^^ '� [Dt „nA,r1) conduct• Ponnhment.j a rrn•,n m,nd P" "It"' with Ih,t find a it P„r,c of I,, , xh h xould tv if for Jer„sn for Fiery p"e"on -bra .r,mna In) of the foi. law lul xue he rR, „ring m :rmt rot a nn1 unhm Ili•+ Slate. L wag .,Is IS judly 9 J.,or.lrlly a,•n,blcl. a m:,demean -q without a x,rraul 'n •aura r m, xnh The uuwfrm,mor xho h1, been I+. rd in , od mte<n,e ..... suit th 3 sun Iharon „Invde where,u,h••rhl of (J 11 ho 5. its anyone to rneagen or xho,1, nlewd or J�,,.,„ , a” Ito ,�.1u,I m n. ,h+ll Ihnu ter man' c.Imt. rI rnar,urm nr )utava,nart usSe,hng ( F it of Ihn State. nr his I d o, igavmt a •+�> I' '•L, f r,a „r In any PL.e ol” In the 1 ohs, ,n np••rJ to rubllc traw 1 I c fl.ts i,i"ng ,eaa to w,-h place - men[ Ifis whh,nu•n ,ball inn apply Io the r,r,an. nation ,uhjmt to per- s ¢iate (b) ts•ho ,ob,�n or xho ensagn m any a,l of r nwulion As u,ed in This Ldluxmg persons (1) An) prraon who Is unu,r the influence an) of the pr, ,,,, o, Y of a nuxirm,amu ,utdISI• (IOUtturmn- to, any Icxd act h h,arn )Knout for mane) or .,thcr of any drug• or Lnder the ,,-mbined mflu. rn,e of imr•x ahng lyuar and any drug fine of not Ira, than . ,m,:d- cr Aon (2) Any r, non xho a prate officer has SAO) nor none dlun (noyl/ns by (c) Who ac,mis other pawns in any P. bhc rill " opurrme r"' 'Auw Witte has co mittedinae 10 Ja)s place n to the Ml for the the mtanor to addumn to subriniswn (f) of this oohs, or by boob fine ' ^q arms ,noon [he dSS,roon of the (d) RTo Totten to or about any toilet (3) Any pclsnn xho a peace niticer m limits poi;, ah 12 'pen to the pahhc for the pmryne of <ngag- &,t xl faith Mictes will attempt rata,•+, or he unru alcd 193' ,h +n ae !ur Ad Au, Ing m or ,oh,Inng 4n) Icwd nr lav -,wus or in) unlawful act -m ,bly diR, uh for mnh.al p"r"otract to ronirnl .,r I, ar 14p 752 (e) Rho loners or wanders upon the (9) R'ho Inners, proxls or wanders upon i of tmplq mrnt as Streets or from Pla„ to rlace -shout ,,. ell rravn or bu,mns the pntale Prulrey of another. m [fie night• lima' xnhoul ",,hie It LSSfuI bu,nim wish or act rnult ng to dmvgr' or p$hall and xho rrL.,n Ip d<nufy hmnrl/ and to wunl L, Im pen• the owner or ,,,upant thereof "'ho. k SO" shall froxi,gt) Gram en,e -hell rr 1W b n pea ,c to do, d the +mn,undmg r Su mta I, nrae (h) 11,11, I,•nrnng, proxlmg• or I,a "Ifamg upon the prate property of an• any any other any other To wch as to Old" rte to a remnnable man that the public "rely demands other In the Inyhttime. peeks In the door or %"'do* Of an) mhabned building or sirup• �r a ...) of Ili, ulr auch Wcni.fica. Iron lure IMAM [hereon, wnhoul tmbls ar Iew'- to `r 10 Inthbglle the the nulled m injury or found (� ) \'h0 n (nand m ]n uh any ace ful bu9nns wlih the o-ner or mcupant the Mr n damage to the n Nolhmg m cm. under Ihr .nP.•x of I any drug, tolacne, ,,y wh,nnce defined as (') \lTo lnlgn many budJma, structure r wb,umg of rot- from a rya,on m S,hi,Jule D of Seetlnn 416o of the Ouenns m,d Pn,fetnom Ilia pen,, Imo of he lolnerpor atc. % tenbt n .,of w,h In' Code• or any ,umMnanun ofmy mtnawaun liquor. dru S Itrd to the (Ina,cSe!h or control [hereof In ny rrosmmn of this !emrnnor Lduene, or an wch c & Y P,•iwn, m such a ,ondo- unit that he n u ^able to any awuv ory pleading charging a tiuhnnn of suhdntsinn (b) of this seciion, tr apply Io an) b lm. eacrclw ,are fur his own "fcty, or the a41y of others, ^r by the ddendant has been once pr<tiously con. ,,. Rd of a tlohunn npb)cd b) a Lbor 4 §21 rra,nn of his h -.n8 LnJrr the mflu, ore of mmvcaling byu,or any drug, Toluene• of the subdnumn, the Pretio•Is ennwison shall be charged In the for sale err u,e of an) aah,tan,e defined 1s a pnnon In S,hr'ule D of Sc,tinn 4160 of the Rumness Profit• ac,u"top' pleading. and, If the protons como,tmn is found to be true by the jury. I ntc�ddenb \Ii�srdrey�• and sours r•tde• or any combination of any in. upon a jury 11111, or by the court• upon a court Ina), of rs adnoncJ by the defendant, Sr rt!+ -♦ `i\� �i�"r%- -calrrYp tiro^ .r: a^ f+:!�T :'.E.Y�a :;1i.". ♦ `.5.,�". .°y^ r.. :a'�Y 1 ��a)±!�'• ipetSSeel.�- i� n ?r •n 1 +a. § 677 DI FRING'S PENAL the ddenJ,nl shall bt impr,oncd in the courtly )ad for a pcnod of not lr.s than 45 days and shall not be eligible for afoot upon crmpitt'on of wntcnte, on pandr, or on my other hags until he has wr.cd a pen„,J of not Ic,s than 45 da,, m the „ only Jill In no ...h case shall the trial court grant pr, I,,,mm .t ,,,pcnd the etnmmn of •anrnce unp•wJ upm the Jdwdsnt In any + „u,t,-ry plc,Jmg .h,rgntg a . I,o.m f wl,loonol (b) of Ihn ,s,G in if IL• dL ',,I hn 1”, pns•.,u.ly .u:neted Ito or I,.m N.1o, of a „'anon of he ,A,1 ..,,.n ,th .,h proems co,wo ,•n •IUII he ,h 16cd ,, the a „ovlor) p1tadmg, and. d I„o ur .•..9c or su,h pra,IOUS „nn¢- Itons we G -land to be true by the Jury, upon a jury, trul or by the court, upm a .run Incl. nr o J nnlcd by 'his defendant, the dcF ,dam •4+11 be .u,pn.....o) in fit .oanly )nl 6•r a pin d of ,,, I,, Ib.m 40 days and Qull not k d.g'Nt for tclu•c upon „'nlple- non of xmcn.c, cn parole. or on an) other bao, trail he ha, .r,icd a pn.A of not less thin 90 .la)s In the .owe) )ill In no sash use ,hall thr Inal court brain probation or su,jcnd the ese,ullnn of wnicnce uupned ulo n the ddaldanl 11461 ch 60 § 2 1965 ,h 1959 § 1 1967 ch 1317 § 1, 1969 1111, 207 § 1 1119 § 2, 1970 ch 26 § 1 1971 ,h Is81 § I en1 .,r § 647 rip, IrJ 1461 ch 5601 (31 Jur 1J I, •nr,.n, ,J tau §2f4. Cmnrnal !aa ,, ¢ ^tq 'III. +046 +(k /, SCNS :0,42. (S/ Jur _J In,La•„ 547• stun Corp Q. IL 142 ,f i7 g:0 tt,rlm Cnnln rp +0, Ila 511, 41% 564, 465, 566, 567, 568, 919, F,,Jen,e p 99 >, pnkeviam 1d, In 707 Sum - +nap p I h all In 4740 §617,. (Opulite until July 1, 1977) (A.,,u)mg or io,lt,ting children.] C,cry per. um 'hit nu,o)s or m.h11s any child under the age of .8 n a ,agent and Is pumduble up.n first .i n otem b) i fine not roeedmg Me hu. Jrnl dollars (Se.(%)) or by Imps, 7- m cut in the count) jnl for not e,cced.ng six m,•.nhs or by Loh ouch line and Impriwu- mtnl irJ Is punohahle upm the sntmJ and ash .tib ,,usnt .1111,1,11011 or lapin the first ,onu.00n a0cr a prc,tous .onuction under St.unn 288 of this code by mlprwmment in the state pawn fur not Ices thin one )car § 677a. (Op,utice Jut) 1, 19 77) [, \nnu) Ing or mniec'ing ch•hirs•n.1 Fiery pI who annals or nudnts an) told under the age of 19 Is a ,a6mnt and is punnhahit Upon firs e,Imi,oun by a fine out e,.ceding five hwWrcd dollars ta500) or by Impnwm meta to the count' Jad for not acceding six 208 months or by tolh such foe and 'mpnwn- mcnc and is pumsbahle op,n the •pond and lath sub• ,,uent t m,.,tion or up,n the first ern,nc..n Acr a go. uous r,•n,'tte,n under ce f.l m 2R8 of ibis ..de by oopn•„umcnt m the state pn +m (1429 Is 376 § 1 194 ch 730 § 1 I, f, St,, 1949 .h Is § I, IE Ex Sess 1950 .h 34 § 1 1951 ch I200 § 1, 1st E, Rc„ 1`152 ch 23 § S. 1955 h 169 § 3, 195' h 1735 § I, 1967 ,h 154 § I, 1476 ch 1139 § 162, , I....o.. July t 19771 U Cal for 7d Cr n oil fat 6D IDcb, +Oq, +06_ +065, x071. C:a/ J.., ,,/ stun (;op§111 §6476. 11nitumg about, or m,d,Jing pen. ns in alter lance at, xbnol f.tin Aing courses to itdult, 1 f, p pers,•n oho loath ut,mt i p xh „sl In which aduhs are In all, ,J ^,c it .,•., •,s e•Lrbb.heJ pur,uol to Art. le 12 (..•..or '.•ng s•oh Sci 6;51) of (I ,plcr 6 of bn.,I, n 6 of the filtration C-,,I, a..d tl , annoys or mol,sls m) p son in 1'0.1e'+me I. um shall to puwn.hed h) a fine of not ex ... ding fi,e hundred dollars (5400) or by m prltmmcnt m the taunt) pd for not es.a,hng wn months, or by both such line and m�prn•onmenl [1965 ,h 1706 §21 11 (71 Jur IJ C-rrmupl 1.0 §§30M, 11(47, r064. 1065 §647c 155 dful and malicious lab li.c• thin of thoroughfares and fluidic places; Local regulations.] f,ery pr•,m who till. full) and n ,h. "•.sl) ob•t•u,ls the free nn,ammnt of u,y Noon on any Bred, ,.Jctall, it nihcr pubb, place or .n or u any psis opn go ,he public is gutsy of s miticmcanor Nothing In this anlmn effects the floors of a oint, or a c,I) lu 1tguLtc .ondwl up.n a sb,rl, IJn•aIA, or other pobhc place in on or In a pli,c o1<n to the public 11967 ch 931 § 1 1968 ch 122 § 31 § 648. A,uing or circulating [unautho• fired] paper money. Etefy perwn tha miles. own, or fns In sir, ulation any bill, , ho A. to Let. ., 11,111, .,Is. pn9m,t,q note. ur the Japer of an) I-ank. to to.ulate as wont) es..p1 as aathouacd by the Iris of the United Stilts, for the first offense, It guilt) of a nnadun,.mor and fur .a,h and get) ,ub,nlucnl uffrn,e, is guilt) of felun) 18 72 1 ( ,,1 Jar co, O +nAs and Other Finn• ..al L,•orun,'ns 141, Cn.Imal I.- §J.'ba 1046, 1067, 06S, Illdm Como IS 464, 467 § 6482. [Pootsslun, manufactu•c, sale er elr,ulatiun of sings n,mbling :.ins: Esetp' Oons.1 f,et) person oho has In Ins pnsso• s' r -4 •Y s ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 05, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Stef fang This years budget included an increase in Engineering's staff cf one Assistant Civil Engineer, one Engineering Technician II and one Engineering Technician I. To date ve have been able to fill only the Engineering Technician I position. Recruiting for the Assistant Civil Engineer and Engineering Technician II has been futile to this point. Both positions have bee: edverttaed twice but neither advertisement produced a quallfied candidate to: the position In the case of views of two applicants% one Eofiwhichtwasfofferedc thetjobtands refused The inter- views e- other applicant vas not felt to be qualified During the second advertisement for the Assistant Civil Engineer no applications were received It would appear that the dlfflcuity in the recruitment is due to the great number of higher paid positions available in the private market for Engineers at this time Because of the high degree of acitvity In the development of commercial and industrial properties within the City, and because of the active Capital Improve- ment Program, it is necessary that the Engineering Division obtain a highly gorlified Journeyman Engineer to assist in operating various functions of the Department The current Assistant Civil Engineer classification has a salary range of $1,581 to $1,922 per month. Evidently this salary range, taken with the work description being advertised, is not attractive enough to obtain a qualified applicant for this position. Rather than accept a lesser qualified applicant at a lover range, which would require valuable staff time to train, it is recoamended that the Engineering Division seek applicants for the position of Associate Civil Engineer the current salary range for this position is $19705 to is $2.073 p Although than thehrangeaforrtheeAssie •antACivil Engineer,Eitiiaer, hoped that the title and additional responsibilities implied by that title will attract more qualified applicants for this position At this Came the Engineering Division is holding off on further recruitment for the Tech ,,ician position to be able better to complement the perdou hired at the Assistant or the Associate level We are exploring the possibilities of reducing the classification to obtain additional clerical help to assist in the Administ*a- rive duties carried out by each of the Engineering staff An alternative to this approach that is also being considered is the retention oC a Student Trainee on a part -time basis to assist the staff in its various duties At this time we are not making any reco®endatlons for the reclassificatlpn of this position, however, we will be evaluating the program based on our ability to hire additional Engineering staff To obtain badly needed Engineering staff we are requesting that the Council approve the reclassification of the Assistant Civil Engineer inlcuded in the 1979 -80 budget to an Associate Civil Engineer position at the appropriate salary range It is recoueended thst the City Council approve the reclasslf1 cation of the Assistant Civil Engineer position currently hold open to an Associate Civil Engineer position. Vo budgetary commitment will be required above the funds already includei in the budget for the current Assistant Civil Engineering position There mm7, however, bu additional budgetary commitmnt for the co=ing fiscal year if the upper pay scales are reached Re /spectfully a mf teed, L oy abbe Cit gin LR: cd at MUNICIPAL IMPROVENr4T ACT OF 1911 [DIVISION 12, STREETS AND 11Ir.11WAYS CODE OF THE STATE. OF CALIFORNIA) The "Municipal Improvement Act o` 1913 ", herpini /-ter referred to as the "1913 Act ", is a procedural act only, which provid.-- for the formation of a special assessment district, the levy ur the assess- ment, and creation of the lien and obligation on the property Said Act does not, within itself, contain any provision for the issuance of bonds, and the bonds to finance the improve•ents will issue under either the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915" [Division 10 of the Streets and liighw?ys Code] or the "Improvement Act of 1911" [Division 7 of said Code] Under the "1913 Act ", a Resolution of Intention i. eventually adopted, which is the jurisdictional Resolution setting forth a description of the wore., the boundaries of the Assessment District, the Intent of the Agency to proceed with the formation of a special assessment district, together with a declaration as to the type of bondn to use to finance the improvempnts, and furthermore, orders the formal preparation of an Engineer's Report. The Engineer's "Report" consist^ of the following: a. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvement; b. A general des•ription of the works of improvement and rights -of -way or land to be acquired: An estimate of the costs of the improvement and the cost. of all lied, right. -of -way, easement., and inci- dental expenses in connection with the proceedings and improvement. The cost estimate would reflect any con- tributions or funding from any source A diagram showing the Assessment District and the boun- daries and dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District; c. The proposed assessment of the total assessable amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed improvement, pro -rated upon the several subdivisions or parcels of land within the district, in direct proportion to the estimated Lenefits to be received by each parcel. The amount or percentage of any contribution would first be deducted from the total estimate costs and expenses. Upon the presentatr m of the Enaineer's "Report ", the legislative body sets the matter for a public hearinq. The amount of the assessments leviad at this time is based upon the Fngineer's esti- mate of the costs for the acquisition and improvements. Notices are then transmitted to the uroperty owners, based on the Engineer's estimate Normally construction bids, and possibly bond bids, would be received prior to the scheduled public hearing so that all assess- ments may be modified and adjusted to reflect the actual construction bids received. Thr al n uivr•. the legislative bode positive essu- rance that the construction contract will be within the budget as preliminarily approved for the proiect i,d that the honds can be sold and the improvemerts finance:] within 're perinuters previously set. The normal matters to be considered at the Public liearinq are the following: a Boundaries of the proposed Assessment District; h. Extent of the works of improvement and acqutsition; C. Method and formula used for assessment spread Upon the conclusion of the public hearing, the public Agency, if it wishes to proceed with the project, will confirm the assessment and order the improvements. At that time a lien is created against each parcel of property within the boundaries of the Assessment District, said lien beinq in the amount of the special assessment as confirmed against said parcel. At that time the propertv owners are mailed notice of their final confirmed assessment and notified that their assessment is due and they have thirty (30) days to pay all or any portion of their assessmert in cash. Property owners, during this 30 -day period, can discharge their property from the obligation or make a partial payment and thus reduce the amount to qo to bond, without the requirement of any interest charges or prepayment penalty. At the end of the cash collection period, bonds will automatically be issued to represent the balance of the unpaid assessments. Bonds will be issued pursuant to the provisions of the bonding act as set forth in the Resolution of Intentica When the bonds are delivered to the purchaser and the cash proceeds received, the work will progress as a cash contract and the con- tractor would be receiving progress payments for completed portions of the work, all in accordance with the specifications as previously adopted by the legislative body. Under the "1913 Act" there can be one or more contracts as determined by tl -e Agency, and these con- tracts would be administered as the Agency administers any public works cash contract. Under the "1913 Act" the interest will a,:crue on the assessments upon the date of the bonds. Thus, the property owners will be paying interest before the work has been completed The provision for cash contracts should provide for thy: most competitive situa- tion possible under the other contrasting applicable special assessment procedural statutes. A local public district cannot use the "1913 Act" procedure for the levy of an assessment in a County or City unless permission of the legislative body of the applicable City or County is obtained prior to the adoption of the Resolution of Intention. -2- IbIPROVEttENT ACT OF 1911 (DIVISION 7 OF THE STREETS AND HIMMAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIAI BONDS The bonds issued ..nder the "Improvement Act of 1911 ", hereinafter referred tc• as the "1911 Act ", constitute a direct and specific lien against each specific parcel of property within the boun- daries of the Assessment District. An analogy could be drawn to a "tar exempt trust deed ". The special assessment lien created is on a parity with general taxes and takes priority and precedence over any private lien, such as a deed of trust, mortgage, or attachment. These bonds are issued in various denominations, from $50.00 up, with the amount of each assessment reflecting the individual assessment as imposed upon the particular parcel of property re- presenting said parcel's proportionate share of the costs of the works of improvement. The principal on the bonds is payable, normally, in equal annual installments of principal, by coupon on each January 2nd. Interest on the unpaid principal is then pay- able by coupon semi - annually on each January 2nd and July 2nd By law, the maximum leqal interest rate of said bonds is 89; however, the bonds may be scld and oftentimes are sold, at a discount. The local Treasurer normally bills the property owner for the principal and interest installments as they become due, collects the paym,ints, and remits and makes the payment of funds to the bondholder. The law does authorize the appointment of a fiscal agent, if that is desired In the event any property owner fails to pay an installment of interest or principal, the bonds will become delinquent and penal- ties are added on at the rate of 19 per month. If redemption of a delinquency is not made, the holder of a bond has the legal right to institute a foreclosure action against the property and said action normally can be completed in a one and one -half (1 -1/2) year period The property owner does have a year's period of redemption followinq the date of sale. The foreclosure alternates available to the bondholder are two -fold: 1. Foreclosure action through the local Treasurer's office; 2. Foreclosure action through the local Superior Court. Any bond and assessment can be disc)arged prior to the full maturity by the pavment of the following amounts: a. Unpaid principal; b. Interest to the following January 2nd or July 2nd; C. Any penalties 119 per month); d. Redemption prerivm, if applicable A redemption premium of five percent t581 can be included in the bord indenture and is a matter determined by the legislative body at the tima of adoption of the Resolution of Intention The Reso- lution of Intention, if the bonds are to provide the 5% redemption premium, must reAte the fact that he premium will be applicable to these proceedingv. The sole security behind a "1911 .let" bo :s •te va ?ue of the properly, inasmuch as there is no plo ?ge of cre�lt by the public agency and there is no fiscal :e.;sasibility or a onomic obliga- tion or pledge on said agcr -y. The law for the "1911 Ac_" bonds provides for a max,num term of 25 years; however, the -last mrjority of issues genera,ly extend over a 10 -15 year period. These bonds are normally issu:d as bearer bonds, and are el.empt from Federal and California p.•;cnal income tax under existilg statutes, regulations and court deg lens, and said bonds are exeept from all California taxes except inhe 1- tance, gift and franchfae taxes. -2- INPROVEMEwT BOND ACT OF 1915 DIVISION 1C OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA [BONDS) bonds issued under the provisions of the "Improvemeni. Band nvt of 1915" (hereinafter referred to as the "1915 Act ") , unlike the 1911 Act bonds, do not constitute a direct and specific t on against the property, but are secured by a redemption fund for the pro- ceedings. The redemption funP then in turn is secured oy the in- dividual assessments as levied on the properties in proportion to the benefits received from the works of improvement. This assess- ment lien created is also on a parity with general taxes and main- tains the same rights as that for other specia' assessments. The bonds will be serial bonds and normally are issu. ,-d in denomi- nations of $1,000.00, $5,000.00, or 510,000.00, with -ne amortiza- tion schedule generally being stru -tured it, such a wet so that )ver the life of the assessment and bond, the property t n.ars' debt service installment for each year will be approximately tte same for the full term. Principal on the bonds matures on Jull 2nd of eaci year, with interest payable semi- annually on January 2nd and July 2nd. The maximum interest rate allowable by law is 82; how- ever the bonds may be sold at a discount. These bonds sic subject to call and redemption on any January 2nd or July 2nd following a 60 day notice procedure as determined by the Treasurer These assessment installments, unlike the 1911 Act bend, are collected on the reg•' ax bill in the same manner as County pro- perty taxes and carry sae same penalty in cases of delinquency If any installments or the assessments are not timely oaid, the property is then sold in the same mr :.er as celinquent property for non - payrent of County property axes. The entity is renuired to advance available funds to the redemption fund in order to purchases the de- linquent property. If no revenue source is available to be advanced to the redemption fund, the Code provided that the entity levy a tax on all taxable property within its jurisdictional bnundarres up to 100 per $100 of assessed valuation to cover the delinquency. With the passage of the Jarvis /Cann Initiative, .t now appears that there is no contingent responsibility to levy thr 100 tax in cases of de- linquency and no available funds, this t e security at this tine for the bonds will be the value of the property bearinq the assessment responsibility, and the amount of available furds that could be used is a loan to the redemption fund until assessments are brought current. An alternate procedure is available for d- linquencies, and that is ,.ithin the discretion of the public ciency is to wliether or not to ii.stitute foreclosure actions throes h the loyal Superior Court This procedure can be done annually and tends to expedite the proceedings to bring delinquent assessments curr.,nt The law for the 1915 Act bonds provides for a maximum term of 40 years; however, the vast majority of issues generally have extended between 10 -25 years. These bonds are normally issued as bearer bonds and are exempt from Federal and Ca ifornia personal inrtme taxes under existing statutes, regulations and court decisions