Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/12/05 - Agenda PacketAGE IIpA C r TY or MICHO CUCAHOIIGA Regular Meeting Lion's park Ccermnity Center 9161 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga December 5. 1979 AGEHPA ITEM _ KT • +' r - ..r h-r e r r , , r rv.•rr r r ••f h rn wr rh G rl r,, r .gLnr rt .•y • r •J r• n rr lhr i •u -1 r41r r,>r th• thr f I I % t aryl third Y•vin,wiv f . r I! nmlh Thu Cltu 11rrk" 'It r I•, ,,s 'I et •h ltrvr 1 CALL TO ORDER 4,,,,� LS+4t`t cx�litww� A. PLEDGE To rLAG 1 • 8 ROLL CALL 111keis T , P,tlry bo k , Cchlosssh Bridge A Frost r APPROVAL Ur 111f111TE5 Ilovember 7, 1979 A11000I1CL•IEOTS a fou" it b 5taff 3 COI41I TILE REPO?", a Advisory Cvnission h Ili-torical COm�,sslon 4 CO•'1SUII CALERUAR- 'In r r . nr , •• n • It r r- , a1 r r 1, rr r. rnl nv,- •r.r ,.i r!, !A b r t •I n•n Mr Ile r r•e. r r ,I nn rr-. r 1. r u JLr• nr. -r. r, rrrr r. nb, r Int. rr•',I nr.rq err t sr rhrt rn rr.•IS !v rtn•.J t .. rh• o.rn,nr , r aelll 1 .r .r . , •, a .r n a. Approval of '•arrants Rcgistrr No. 79 -12 -05 for S105,428 .6 .... ..1 b Approval of Alcoholic Peve-age License, request by Lnuis 2 _ A. Gonzales and Yoni Cha at P008 Archibald Avenue (Rancho 1 Cucamonga Dive thru Wiry) for off -sale beer and trine i tit) 'I A,rl.' • C Request authorization for San Bt,na,dino (nunty to construct ) slnnaTs a[ foe intersectinri of 19th and Carnelian StreeCS -- Recornendation It is rerommended that the City Council approve — olution 40 79 -q9 authorizing San Bernardino County to consti uct signals at nineteenth and Carnelian Streets and relinquishinq mairtenance of Carnelian Stie ^t 300 feet eithe, side o Nineteenth to the County for the duration of construction. RESOLUTION 110 79 -99 5 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCh1011bA, CALIFCRI(IA, AUTHOR1711.G SAN DERNADUINO COUNTY TO COIISTRUCT SIGNALS AT NINETEENTH STRTFT AND CA171011AN STREET it Request authorization "0" U ty C07g01 to adjust cp-ycn_sa t ion 6 _ late Tor sec, eba-y at tend inq Dl a on lnq Corm ss l nn fleet logs - �t.....w..0 ., Cu.........�'i .�+.. e. Tract 9426 Accept roads and release trod Located on the west side of Nanch Gate Roads north of Hillside Road Owner Crowell /Leventhal, Inc. Perfor,nanre Rood (road) S50,000 Par el Hap 5515 . nelease of a paving deposit Located at 9712 Garden Street Owner Ken Chase Pavinq Deposit $ 750.00 Encroach, -ent Permit 0Z26 f In order to receive F A U funding for tuns b u,tion of signals o _ at baseline arnt Hellman Avenue a, ,thihald and Church Street, it is net ess i,y for the rity Coun. �I to approve the City -State A,H •e„ent and autimrizim, resolution rZ,,,.r „� sa..,..... t �... r {� 4,•,,,•,•. Rer03>endat ion It is ir, 1. vpnAed that rig^ f1tI fount it of the (sty of Rancho (uceumma approve the aq,eenent and execute the authorizing resolution RESOLUTION 110 79.100 10 A RESOLUTIOH Of THE CI-t COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAIICHO CUCA UNGA, CAL1 M111A, AUTHORIZII,G THE EXECUTION 01 LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5470 AnD PROGRAM SUPPLEtIENT NO I City luum fl Agenda r Hr, mulx•r 5, 1979 (I Vacation of Aldrr stlect lrubll lip,, r In, 1' In 791 12 At the City Council .neetinq of Ibvenber 71 „ Pesolution of Intent to Mass' the offer of dL +litatfon for Airier' Street was passed and a pub'ir hearing date of Deccnjer 5, 1979, was set Because it was rot possible to meet legal requirenents for advertising and itistinn of the notice for the street vacation, the public Imaril9 has been continued to the Council meeting of December 19, 1J79 Ali other parties involved have been notified of the chmge of date If Parcel Plap 4957 (app -oral) - arcept the agreement and TT _ Parcel map for devellop•ent a! th east corner of Baseline and Hellman Avenue The dgveT pnent consists of 3 acres and 3 lot, The street improvements are to be installed in accordance with the approved street improvement plans Performance Bond ( Lefter of Creditl $15 000 Labor F ftaterial (Letter of rrpdit) SIS,00,1 RESOL1IT10U fill 79 -101 / IS v A RMILuT1f1H OF 'HE CIjY'COUFICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIMA, CAL IFORIJA; APPROVING PAP,LL MAP FORMER 4957, (TEtITATlq£ PARCEL MAP 110 4957) IMPROVFHEFIT AGREEIIENT, -AHD IIFPROVEHEIIT SECURITY I Negative Declaration and Zone Change Flo 79 -09 - Anderson - lone i thanop frvsi R -1 to R-Tfpr p,onerty iocahvdon thi• east ` -- side of Vineyard, south of Foothill Assessor s Parcel Flo 208- 241 -02, 11 Public hearing set for UK ember 19, 1979 J Negative Declaration and Toning Ordinance Amendment UP 79 - ^S City of P,ancho rucamonga - - Tin Ordinance establrshinq standards and review prutedures for Planned Community Developments rubllc hearing wt for 6•crnber 19, 1979 l part Tas Fee Lhdlnan,e - 'o amend Ordinance n, SCLtinn 7 regarding park ta+ credit for recreational far fifties Public Marina set for December 19, 1979 1 Tract 9567 Aa rept Luhiect rap and irplov M -cnt securities 36 Lo, ation Northwest corner of Highland and Herm»sa timer f ew's IlLVees Per forman•e Bond (r ^•1,1) 5156,:91) Laty R flaterial (road) 5156,0on Cash ftunumentation Bond S 1,350 RESOLUTION NO 79 -103 _ 37 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or RAHCIIo CUCA)IONGA, CALIFORIIIA, APPROVING 111PROVEftENt AGREEIVIT, IIIPROVEREhT SECMRITv, MID rltlAI MAP OF TPACT 110 9567 Z. I It I,•.no -I A nul, I),, N.,her 5, 1979 • m the eaistino (I TA Police cadet positions at the sheriff's Sub _39 _ Statlon;M! be ahsortpd byy fire c ity at the end of this year This neces�tates establishing a_ pay range_ ?mpSrabTe to the L3 Ts cun_enf pay pan Recorn;eada t Ion• That the existing CETA police positions be adfuste� ,c [slat of the Citv's Steno Clerk salary range 5829- 1008 per month whey these positions are absorbed into the City's payroll n . Recaimendatton to attend Policc Chief -City Flanager Scminar. Authorization is requested for the City tlanaget and Captain Tan wickum of the Cher iff's Oepart °ent to attend A special seminar for Police Chiefs amt City Managers The three day session will to in Jawrary in the city of la Jolla It is antieilatrd that the seminar lift) result in frgiroved •,xn,onicatiot awl a rove effective relationship between the cheriff'S Oeoartment and the City As Council is aware, although the Sheriff's Department provides services through a contractual rrangement, the local co+ wander is a re-.ber of the rity's lanageicent Tear If Council is in concurrence with the r M, iesr, funds are available in the rity Manager's ciscellaneois It ivel account It is significint to note that the (jrate, portion of the costs Involved in the ser-inar i,r letmNnsib)r throunl, thi, rear, nffice.s Standards and Training Pinnr.ma IPO%Z) 5 PUGLIC wEIIRINGS A. The City Council hav directed the staff to draft an ordinance 0KI, wit rreiieal Ihdinance ho 'H al'owinn fcw the use and sale oT safe and sane fireworks within the 'lty of Rancho Cuca,wnga_ The Imposed ordinance_acconpliShes that purpose Leca,r,nndation It is ,eronrended that the City Council adopt 1Trd1iiance fie 78 -A ROMANCE 110 78 -A II,rst Pn,d i ng) 42 All ORDIt1AUCE Or HIF CITY COUNCIL OF Tut CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORIIIA, REPEALING Ill IIS EFIIIRETY ORDINAUCE NO 78 PELATIIIG TO REGULATING THE VOpAGE, USF AgD SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIREBOPPS H1711111 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIOIIGA B. General Plan Anendrent t:o 79 -03E and 79 -e31 -- City of _43 Rancho CucaTnouga —kepot t by Tlarry TTonan A chance in the present designation of the Property on the northwest come, of Ba9eline road and haven Acenoe to conform with the property as it is currently developed ■ Iii I e• i i. I".., beh ' , 1979 Recnnr.endat l on The Pianninn (I -' iscion -e•oanends t;at the • (itv found) aPprnve General Plan Aliondrvn• flo 79 -03C and 79- 031. tleggative Declaration and General Plan Amend,.e•t No. 79 -03F_ 58 qty 20 51 io tucomonge Taeport � Barry ifog• i _ Request to clarify the meaning of Alternative Commercial Sites Recd �endation The Planning Cmmissi,o ;euvnnends that tine City touncil approve the conibindtion of the asterisks into one asterisk overlayinq the intersection and the identification of two areas as neighborhood Camnur.ity and the elimination of certain asterisks as stated above D. General Plan fo�endrent Ill 79 -030 - City of Rancho Cucumonya - h9 A CTtange Tior• tl;n proaen( di%1q timh of low duithty residertial (2-5 units Per V.nst acre) to medium A,n,,t, residential (5 -'S dwellino units per' nru%s acre) for (he Irnperty bonded by Red Hill Country Club Drive, Tapia Via, Ranrhm ha Drive and San Bernardi, n Roar, Recomendation The Planninq Cormission re,mvends that the City CougriT approve General Plan Amendment No 79 -030 / jrt � , .1I .)..,a. F 1, la,. � y t The City of Rancho (ucai,.nn9a Historic Preservation (onmission 1; 71` {� ® has foinvardrYf to i htv (nuns it for their-- (onsideration A •i -es "1z tvt which have been nutol amt of histm is velue by other governrental >L) ^!( avencies - - --a Reconr,endation That the City Council adopt Ordinances ho 92 anT Ii1 reronnizinq Casa no Rancho fucamdnga, The Tapia Adobe Sitr, and furar-nn,ia Rancho Wriery as historic lan(knarks and the Garcia Ranch House, gn(.le Dilly c Ta•ern The Cucamonga Chinatown Site, Cousins Ifouse and Milliken Rance as Points of Historic Interest 1POINAt11E 110 97 (First Rending) 78 AN ORDINANCE OF THE 117Y COUNCIL OF THE (ITY OF RANC110 CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE (ASA DE RANCHO CUCAMMA, �, AIIO TIIE CUCAItOtIGA RANCHO WINEkY AS IGNTFI(AN7 HISTORIC FEATURES OF TIIE CITY AND 17fEREF3RE KA+Fr IkIFS,EACII AS A CITY HISTORIC LAf1WIARK b a ORDINANCE NO 93 (First Readin(l) 79 Ali ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIfE PITY OF P.AIICHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE GARCIA RANCH HOUSE, UNCLE BILLY'S TAVERN, THE CUCAIANGA CHINATOWN SITE, THE COUSINS HOUSE, AND THE MILLIKEN RANCH AS • SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINTS 'IF INTEREST OF THE CITY AIID THEREFORE OW4;NAIE. EACH AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST I - Ac. -, December 5, 1979 Lity LounLll Agenda 'i" F Resolution to am nd the adpyted interim land use, circulation • and_DU�Ir fa cil ties rnent of the kanclIO'C"camonga Genera haln --- Rece mendation Staff is reconmendinq that the City Council adopt Resol ut lcn No 79 -102 amending various elements of the Rancho Cucamonga Gener PTatt.- RESC'_UTIOfc { 79-102 A RESOLV ION lF / HE CITY. CWIILIL OF THE CITY CUCAIIONGA. CALIfO AMENDING THE ADOPTED LAND USI. CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACIIITIES OF THE rANCHO CUCMIONGA GENERAL PLAN CIT- y-MNAJLR'S ST kFF WWII', Parkway Development_Pnol f ty_ List lclaiin-�r 96 or RANCHO IfITERIH 1-1 -+C rLE11ENT &, /y Report by Barry Hogan, Senior _ t0? Staff has ueveloped a list of priority parkway projects for Council's consideration A list of seven possible projects were presented to both the planning Commission and Advisory Commission to select a (pilot project) that would demonstrate the Citi's program for the use of beautification fees • Recemmendation: A,ropt tip Planning Con.lission and the Advisory Lori ns {T 7n n't tmnenOa t i on that the City Council use the Reautification Fees [hit have On rently b.,en collected for the maintenance. clpining, retrofitting N landscape aild irrigation to the jar parkways stapinq along CCrnpllane f a n retrofit Avenue south of 13dselile to the approximate extpnsinn of rimrch Stmm, olain ru,Ittee Selection - Report by Lloyd Ilubbs 109_ city Engineer As a part of the contract for the Stnrm Drain (taster Plan Update, it was env.sioned that an Advisory Conittee would he fomrpd to levini consultant recommendations for policy and drainage systpm design This Committee will review findings and make 1 eco,anmdations to the City council for adopt n It is reconiecded that the Cemdttee include the following: Two (2) representatives of the City Council Two (21 representatives of the Planning Commission One (1, representative from each Advisory Committee Two (2) representatives from the Chamber of Commerce One 1) representative from San Bernardino County Flood Control District 0 City rnuncil Agenda -7- .1 December S. 1979 The Committee Wit meet a few timrs in the iv.t month to es Liblish policy The Co"Mitter will then meet Periodically over the next year dealing with various aspects of the study Recommendation That the Council approve the formation of tlic Committee as recommended ana select two members to serve C. Appeal of Street Improvement Rrgu�iremen is for Building Permit - Eoji -n lTe �Fepori by iTyd irubg6s,ZiFy 1ng�eer - Recommendation- Since the Planning %,mission will be reviewing end recormendlny ,Jditional Policy options in January, staff recommends that the City Council refer this matter to the Planning Cnmission for thei, teview and th^ City Council not tike an action on this until the ru,ai roads st+nda,ds revort +: su-•Tttrd i,v the con.••ission llnanwhile, staff will wrrk with the applicant du,iln•1 this time D Seem ity/ffi_e Loss - Rol'nrt by Marry F,iv(�y. lI8 The need arises In that the City off -i;cs do no' have - adequate fire protection to safeguard valuable records and documents critical to the operation of the City functions The City Auditors have also expressed a desire to see the City obtain needed equipment to Provide security and fire protection to ,e, twin financial records, ordinances, and • resolutions. Recommmnda Lon It is rMuested that Pity Council authorizes the IansTer ,f S6,000 frnn contingency to the Capital accounts of Adrdnist•etion, finance, crimunity Se.-vices and fomnunity Devolopmen , for the purchase of one fireproof safe and five fire proe file ,abinets 7 CITY ATIORDEY•C REPORTS Ei 11E4 ODS111ESS a Council b. Audience 9 ADJOURRII[UT Z .i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: Novenb.r 21, 1979 To: Lauren Wasnercu and Jim Robinson from: Jack Lan, Ulrcctor of Community Development bubjec.: CWPENSATIGN FOR ATTENDANCE AT PLAMW, CDMISSION MEETINGS BY TPE CaMNITY DEVELOPMENr SECRETARY As you are aware, the subject of adequate compensation for the Community Development Secretary to attend Planning Commission meetings vas discussed during budget time but apparently the Issue fell between the cracks. Since I feel this matter is very important, I wish to rai ^i It again and request some consideratiun for solving the problm. The method of compensation for the Community Development Secretary's atten- dance at Plamlog Commission meetings was designed to accomplish two things; first, provide adequate compensation for actual time spent sc Planning Commix- • sion meetings; and two, provide compensation for having to attend night meetings. Having ar. efficient and capable secretary to attend Planning Coclssion meetings In a premium and the secretary is a vital part of the team; however, e.4,en the current compensation of $25.00 per meeting was originally conceived it was not anticipated that Plamlog Commission meetings would be greater than two a month and continue long hours into the night and morning. Many meetings have gone to 1:00 and ' M in the morning. The result has been Inequitable cmpensntion. In fact, he $25.00 per meeting were to be translated into compensation per hour, it. imunity Development Secretary is working for less than her regular hourly rate, resulting in an obvious Inequitable situation. In order to allevlats this Inequity and to provide a ccutinuing incentive to attend these meetings, I propose the following solution: Increase the minimum compensation from $25 00 per ocating to $40.00 per meeting and that for any attendance at meetings beyond 21:00 p.m. the Community Development Secretary shall be compensated either at her hourly rate or coop. time. I believe this solution would be equitable and would counteract any reluctance t attrmd meetings and maintain an incentive for the Community Development Secretarial oosition Please advise` me as tc the disposition of this matter. Respec 1 submitted, c ® JACK LAM, Director of Cemanity Development JL: ram f� M E M O R A N D U M TO: City Council P:10:4: Lauren N. 7essetman City Manager SUBJECT: Electicn Policies DATE: December 5, 1979 In connection with the April, 1980 municipal election, there are a number of policy decisions which must be made by the :Sty Council The issues to be resolved are as follows: I. CANDIDATES' STATEHENIS. At the time a candidate receives nomination papers, the City Clark is assigned the duty to provide a copy of regulations and charges, if any, for printing, transiatloea, and post- age The City Council should determine the followiwg policies relating to the candidates' statements. A. Word Limitation. The City Council may remove the 200 word limita- tion and Increase it to as much as 400 words. B. Charges for Printing and Handling. The City Council my charge candidates +ho wish to prepare Qualification statements for the printing, hindllrg, translation, and other materials. If the City Council determines that charges are appropriate, a pro -rata share will be charged to each candidate C. Advance 22' it is [or Candidate'• Statement. IC Is recommended that If CL Council determines that a charge should be made for candi- dates' statements, an advance deposit of $175 should be collected by the City Clerk at the time the candidate's statement is filed. II. CONPAICH CONIRIJUrTONS. The Covernmant Code provides the City Council with the authorsty to limit campaign contributions. If the Council wishes to limit contributions, the City Attorney should be Instructed to draft an appropriate ordinance. III. REBUTTAL ARcummrS ON BALLOT MEASURES. In the event there are ballot measures for the election, the City Council may, not Liter than the day the election on the measure is called, provide for submission of rebuttal arguments. I9. ROTATION OP CAYD rOATES' NAMES ON THE DaT tOT. Altho•:gh the Secretary of State determines the order In which candidates 'll appear on the ballot, the City Council may pass a resolution to rap--ire rotation of candidates' names on the ballot in each preclnct.Becaur the costs and the potential for errors to di:.tributing the ballot m tnr .a, this alternative is not recommended. r� Y " City Council December 5, 1979 Page Two V. PEE FOA PROCESSING NOMNATION PAPERS. Tho City Council. my provide for o filing fee not a :tending 925 to cover costs of processing a candidate's nomination papers. VI BILINGUAL REQL'IRDUMS. Unless otherwise spemlfied, mho City ♦ill print all ballot materials and candidates' statements in both English and Spanish. The election laws do permit notification that copies of all materials ara available at City Pall and at each precinct on election day Unfortunt tely, the issue of bilingual ballot materials is isi.rpreted differently by City Atto.neys. The issue 1s further clouded by the toaeral Voting Rights Act which is intended to protect the rights of voters regardless of whether they speak or read the English language. The Voting Rights Act claarly designates the City Clerk as the election official resooneible if the rights of voters are violated Because of the varying interpratations of tho Federal law, it to recommended that all election a ter!ala be printed in both English and Spanish. An effort will be made to provide clarifying language in the State Election Code during On coming year. RECOMENDATION. After the Council has made a detarmimation, the staff will prepare a comprehensive resolution for the City Council at the nett meting LM:baa attach - Election Calendar J- 0 .J CALENDAR FOR MUNICIPAL ELECTION Tuesda7, April 8, 1980 Jan 10 -31. 3180 ............ Nomination papers for candidates may be obtained. Conflict of Interest Statements must be filed by each candidate disclosing investments and interests in real property at the time papers are filed. Feb 1.. ....... .. .. Candidate's statements may be withdraw. Feb 5••• •• .. •••••• •.. • •• Extended nomination period if papers for as incumbent elective officer are not filed by Feb 1, 1980. Fab 6 • .............••• ••••• Order of names on ballot will be determined by the Secretary of State. Feb 11 . .. ... ... ... publication of Nominees and Measures in the order they will appear on the ballot. Feb 18 ..... ... ...... Ballot argument submission - this Is the final day for submission of ballot arguments. Feb 28 .... Firstday, for mailing of polling place cards and sample ballots. Campaign ststmrent due concerning all reportable Steps up to Feb. 25, 1980 for expenditures exceeding $200. March 10 .. ...... ... Appoiatrent of precinct officers and designation of polling places. Close of voter registration for municipal election March 10 -April 1 ... ....Application for absentee voter may be obtained from city cic.k March 27 .... ......Second ( unalgn Statement due for expenditures exceudf.g sat* April 1 .... ....... .. .. Last day to receive "norma." absentee voter applications. April 1 -April 8 ..... .... . .Late application for absentee ballots for ill, disabled, hospitalized, htmdlcapped, or any voter unable to be present because of unusual circumstances April 8 . ........... ....Election Day ® April 15 .................... .canvass of returns. Certificates of election issued by City Clerk. Juna 12 Third c expenditure statement due for expenses ...................... exceeding $200. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December S. 1979 TO: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk YI JECI: Signature Authorization Somehow in the processing of the papervmrk for the sale of excess property at - Baseline and Hellman, the bank and title company put William Holley as the person to sign for the city. My problem to that both agencies require written documentation for those authorized to sign I do not have It In order to be consistent and to avoid any ?table= in the future. I suggest that Council authorize both the =yet and city clerk to sign these documents by minute action. This action is acceptable to both the bank and title company. The title company 1s retyping the deed with this correction. 0 .n. MEM0RA11DUM ecii b e r�5, 1979 TO: City Council /City Manager FROM: Harry Empe - SUBJECT Consultant Services Re: Proposition 4 On November 6, 1979 the Gann Initiative pas,ed by an almost 3 to 1 margin. Obviously echoing the anti- government sentiment that has been growing over the last few years. With its pissage, and in very short order will follow the implementation of legislation and regulations, the City will have to follow the mandate of public and begin to operate according to the dictates of Proposition 4. At best Proposition 4 is hard to read, and even harder to interpret Each Person who does read it will read it through his /her own eyes, as tax- payer, administrat.,, lawyer, accountant Most who read it will probably not finish it due to its confusing language, and will be spared the problem of trying to guess what it means. Proposition 4, unlike Propostion 13 which cut off our source of revenue (taxes), restricts government growth from the front by restricting rate of advance. In reading Proposition 4 one f'nds that ambiquities reign supreme through- out the initiative; especially in the area of definitions such as: 'appro- priations limit or *proceeds from taxes' Questions like; are accounting definitions binding in court on decisions relating to Proposition 4? Un- fortu.ately the State Supreme Court's recent review of Proposition 13 said no t.�y are not binding However, you cannot ignore what his been codified by Government Code. � Mn the many unanswered questions, staff began checking with o'her cities to see if they had any answers or even if the question are the aaue. However, nothing nad been obtained The big problem now is how do you implement Proposition 47 But even beyond that, how do you Implement Proposition 4 in the most efficient and benefi- cial way to the City? In reIlewing available staff time and the pending work load and training re- quirements fo, the implementation of the computer system it has been determined that several months would be required to investigate, analyze, and implement Proposition 4, more time than staff has whicl, also has to prepare an effective budget that properly reflects the requirements of Proposition 4. In addition the City auditors have mentioned that b_..ause of the costing requirements of Proposition 4, cities will have to invol,,e themselves in an area of accounting that they have never had to be in:,lved in before and 410 that is cost accounting or cost allocation Although not beyond staffs' November 5, 1979 Memorandum capabilities, it 1s beyond staffs' ability to accomplish this to a timely manner. Budget preparations will begin soon and the demand on staff is tremendous Fortunately the City of Rancho Cucamonga has an opportunity to make Proposi- tion 4 work. in its most efficient manner with as little limitation as possible on City programs that are necessary to this City's growth It is suggested that the City of Rancho Cucamonga enter into an agreement with tir Douglas W Ayres, Consultant, to provide the City with reclutical assistance in analyzing City revenue aid fee structure and 'costs" as defined in Proposi- tion 4 His services amonr other things also include developing a cost dis- tribution system to match lees with services financed ;herewith. Even tho.igh the requirements of Proposition 4 are new, the basic principles, needs are basically the same as those that Mr Ayres has been working on "iveloping for the past ten years Hr Ayres has had many years of experi:nce in the field of municipal govern- ment not only as administrator but as a consult-,nt as well The fees for accomplishing what needs to .,c done would be $6,750 and would cover a period from January through June This would also include a up blic presentation of the system if so desired. HJE:cak 0 It R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA r YVE Vyy((E N 0 0 R NAME S 1 8NARRRR yN4 80319 80710L` OC))Z22222z1 777985 000323 WC S 77e2144 ♦ l' 027710 VyL,11 pD 0277 00`2I6 5s REGI TS TRY LELREGENTS EPuBLI� EPP R[TEETtREMENT S HANK 6FRAM RICA FROST JA(M( S cE FOOpRM ALI Nil REITER Ot11VEL06 IN AyyH 1 71 / ^' 1 1 1 1 •02797 1 0227 ?4 120t 02776 0 ^B He 02778 1441 0278749 z22s54555 pg0pqfflI 2Z6Y0 772277784 270p0 82788 A1.73OOHILINjUTOL80GY 0029(0 4900p 0227923 54`9195 0279E $114 02795 6600 02796 6607 6630 02798 1`195 p 0800 72280 02802 TM BATEEEEEENTKEEI OFNAMEEOEEIRIICA NTaCLSA Bu CO COLOFAS�NOBERNARDINO C`CUUC`SAN ONCpOOITNMANSPORTAT MISILIBSNEAPQ}jRNTSi NG D OLS 0 EjIGRAyVV ING /TROPHY MOLL[t[ YrJMOl418M LDESIGN (H(UBBSr 1. YO IA'ID St0 KIN ENGINEERS, L 0 K —M R 4056 LAM JACK MARE IN; JOHN L C MCcEANLF{,SrM/, NIL METRO VOL ITAA�I NANCY GIST 1 0'803 7293 02004 7375 02805 7500 02806 PC EELENNEY}� F MONAMANI Ct AUOIA DAYALAN MD N SERV CRAT111EY CC 1 07 77550 02808 C4�EETAIPING 7910E CSOLDR PRESS 878210 02910 8p020 ;RA M( NEIHACLtNtSy EPCION 1 1 1 1 1 02812 8200 02814 831C 02816 836674 0z28t([g8 g839y90 0228220 8495 02822 8525 02823 0290 02024 VOIC 11081 NSONTAJ AN ES H SS5AN 4_NTFNI0TTCORK 40SSCPIT SS$ OC ALEWESTEGONSTRUCfORS SSGpUTH RN CALIF GAS CO STARK,E TRAYMC.V9O STATIC ERSECORpICN NEST END UNITED NAY FINAL TOTALS 1 1 ���iii��1777 1 N b' NET M 80.00 ♦ 290.99 4,63000.00 105,428.26 Ps' L m COP1 w eet jaea* t ...n tww• tr t nw. u.. rvl u.. t« e.w,..drt oww or. APPLICATION FOR AICOMOUC 99VLRAGI UCINSI(S) itOepm ent of Akohelk Bewrag. control u•SOSa «t M, n?R.IAROT110 Sadamemq Colf. 93[11 • rr..rt..ewr.....n..l The wrderigned he,eby opptet fw fmroet delmbd at lo0ord 1. TY►(S) OF UCENSUS) IIIE NO. - � OF? GALS B3M & MIS AFpcd wide, Sec 24" ERtta» pawl Issuance FEE NO. GEOORA/IUCA cope 3615 pore lewd — 2 NAAtEIlI OF AlIIICANi(S) Temp. Fam4l Ertetx.. pot« GONZALSOp Louis A. 3 Toni Cba 0. TWE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE UG TYPE FM. TSF. 525.00 20 �. Nam. d eavlet. a cto ue s te<oam et evwi �t- 1(,iy6r�� Sm�. ur. i003 Arc` ..2� tiaoF�oJSV G,' \ Ca _•c77 tcangio 4uEa oea;,a 91730 9 9151,0. Rican No. 43797 TOTAL 525.00 Sn nyespt e uof elmkeanw 20 /. m Fmm we Wide GN LWN? Tes 9. Mme yes em bnn tawicmd of a fekn77 10. Maw you eve, vtololed a" of the pmddmt of the Afm4alk Bemmge Cc" Ad or r I.Mm of the Deparrmem pen _ tatn; o to the Ad? / lj 11 E.plan a rYES� am.e, ro item[ 9 a. 10 en a oa«hmw whkh 71141 M deemd pert d tMt app0taaan. nr 13. Appl.onI agmee (a) IM o" manager eelplayed m on.taf. Rnmed p,u ,, . M hYee an the "I;gMgont of a gtemee, and (b) that he r01 not 4018`0 of <wte or pe,mtt w be "Glatd m7 ,.f the pran..nt of ff+ Akahafit Beverage Control Act. 'R 9An P.•JIIiJ 1:. STATE Of CALIFORNIA Carry DERNA al __ __t __ pats i1A/79 _ ew. e.-... d errv. r err. rw ,lees.. .erg ..1.., reM r.e .n1. rtl .Y Y 1ta rMr.. r e•. d Y wires r wraw , Wes d M W' �Z rM u N Iwr1 a.drr.n aM rarrW ,. ytt Y warMr r Iw YWn q1 M b I.n .rt r4 1r err •erlle.r r.e t..w ti awes Mw1 M ar � r a d at wrr.Y ard..h w .o., m aar r ewr rt. aw a. a.Mes r �M b. r.r a..n r sirs .•ear w M ..elr1 r wt 4rw q w s.Mr1 rd.r ,ti hrrMJ 4 .M aY .wM1rlr Y r4r la M M Yrdr .eer.n.a r n1w.I eeMr Y w rW r .w:dr a. Iar...r d • Yr r r NY r .rte+ Brae Yr rr• er rYre Iwl a.....w.4t M M r rM .r ti.dr e.e/�rs „ W rA M. 0.ewoY r Y .•+ r wYW r rMewr a I Ir r. Mrr d .wrwr r 1• I.rr.e w Y•.t w war d wMwr� lfl aw M .e.Ir ..e4eea+ wr M vee4.w ti raw a. •�. r w \we rY. w wJay Fpry •- r a lI. APPLICANT ^ SON HERE ccb - — — — — - -- -- - -- APPLICATION an bBYwTRANSFrEROR ].T�lit�79 s STATE of CALIFORNIA Cay of y._ - -- — — ar. e.a..r d r.Pn, �. w �•e.a rerw aev.r• e,..., .ree.r •y � tll rY Y M p1.rs, r r rrrw. Mar d ra rrr.r err..... ad ti e.Crser.e errs.. rd.rrY aY.rrw•e y _arwr.sY .rdr +.tsar r w .,.rr� T ar V M Irr.r F.a •+••1 F.:..fa ►r....1 Mw W w .w.r Wr erMr+r r .w..er r r. w[.r ray Yrer Yip.. r M veer was d aY .e..-' - trw a rA M4,. Y Mw•+aw ` W Vr, al aw a, IrJr ....rrlr r r,rrt Yrlr Y r,r �4 N /YM M /•rr•r d . 4r r Y Nle 7•rai rM/a1 i+•. M•►W�rr!T .en' ►tray Yr Vr r MA er errrr wMrYr Y W rl► Y aYwr,w r M aW r .wY► M.rr w r Yr er war d n.Jrr L r'..Y..t Y YYr e,e d � la rYr Y 4r..r y.arYr M N rYa.w ti Jr ry wMr+ r r �... da w rrYYe ra.+vr r .r swrlr.t Id Nenx(il of Utemee(t) 17. Sgnata,e(t of Lkemee(t) 1 +�:. I& lkeme N.miedd 2R32i'Mia! ..� • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATEr December S. 1979 TOr City Council 8 City Manager FROMr Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SRN BERNARDINO COUNTY TO CONSTRUCT SIGNALS AT CARNELIAN STREET AND NINETEENTH STREET Attached for Council approval is a letter from the San Bernardino County Road Department requesting relinquishment of portions of Carnelian Street for the duration of construction of signals at Nineteenth and Carnelian. Bids were received on November 16, 1979, and the construction cost will be $67,547 This will be funded from County carryover funds with a 50-50 cost sharing with CALTRANS. The County had previously o•dered control and mist arm equipment for delivery in January. If no other unforeseen delays occur the signal should be wrier construction in February of 1980. • REMVENDATION: It is recormended that the Council adopt the attached resolution relinquish- ing maintenance of Carnelian Street 300 feet either side of Nineteenth to the County for the duration of construction Respectfully sub gitted, Lloy HuDDs/ City ngineer LBH:deb 3 TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT _ COMN of Sn Bernardino PUSUCWoRxtAGM _ 4• n�:....•A 915 Eon Third Stmt S+n Bwnwdlne, CA 92415 171413811:95 �- f IONN n. {NON1 irw,iM� 1 Mr. Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline, Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubris: November 15, 1979 File: H06527 RE: CARNELIAN STREET /SH 30 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECT As you know, we have advertised the Carnelian Street signal project for bids and have scheduled bid opening for 10 a.m. on November 16, 1979. Since this project lies within the City it will be necessary to have Carnelian from about three- hundred (300') feet north with to about three - hundred (300') feet south of the intersection declared a County road during the construction period to comply with Statc Law regarding expenditure of County Road Funds This procedure requires a resolution by the City Council authorizing the acceptance of the road O by the County and a Board of Supervisors Resolution accepting the road for the construction period. Please request your Council for the necessary action as soon as possible and forward a certified copy to me The resolution should follow the format used on the other projects we have built in the City and should specifically indicate that all maintenance responsibility will be automaticaliy accepted by the City upon the bounty's acceptance of the contract work. This will avoid the need for another set of resolutions upon the completion of the project. Attached for your convenience is a copy of Resolution No. 78 -74 which you provided us for the Baseline improvement which follows this format. If you have any questions please feel free to call the undersigned at 383 -2804. Very truly yours, JOHN R. SHONE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION By l' John A' Steger Planning Engineer JRS:JAS:yf Attached as noted - ,n • ,a yr I Nr•Nl Nt r• tVIM,JN Iwxn•n•N ' AI \n.O45RV Sw•w,ON••[1 If"'4„ of n..r nw' .. . .. • . •. -• I RESOLUTION No 79 -99 CITY OF RANCHO CUfJU'ON�• CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TO COt15TRUCT S1GtUU.S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE AT NINETEENTH STREET AND CARNELIAN STREET project for the construction of a signal at Ninetee th 11F1ERFA5, the a: and Of incorporation of tue City of Rancho Cucemong Street and Carnelian Street was included in the San Bernardino County Budget at tha time have agreed that the planned:Should WHEREAS . the City and County D be coopleted b• the County in the same manner as t Provides for the acceDtanca of lywith require - �Rpd require- System fora purposes of construction County mad Lystem): the County Road funds be spent solely on the County ments that County HHERFAS, upon completion of the construction it w111 be appropriate for the City to resume all maintenance responsibility- for of the City of esE. the County to arrange for and administer the NOU, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the C Y Rancho Cucaaonga requests construction of signals at Nineteenth Street and Carnelian Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tsouthhe City ofi theocenterline of Nineteenth the date of award of a ce ^tract to acceptance of of Carnelian Street from 3JD Street as a County Road from • lete; and lete the contract as comb revert Supervisors. Carnelian St;ibilitYlassumed byctheyCoun•Y BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that upon acceptance of the contract as by the County Boards and all onsibility of the Ctty. period shall become the resD during therconstruction peall maintenance re9 Os Decenber. 19IS durin9 PASSED, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this Sth day yor ATTEST ty e— I s • HEHORANDUH DATE: November 27, 1979 TO: City Council FROI1: City lianager /J SUBJECT Compensation r Planning Commission Secretary The attached memo from Jack Lem to me outlines a problem which is of concern to us. As you are aware, shortly after incorporation we estab- lished a $25 per meeting compensation rate for the secretary to the Planning Commission Unfortunately, since Planning Commission meetings tend to last much longer than City Council meetings, it appears that the $25 rate on a per hour bast is inadequate. Jack has recommended that the compensation rate per meeting be increased from $25 to $40 and that for any attendance at meetings lasting beyond 11:00 p.m. (nearly every meeting) the Community Development Secretary shall be compensated either at her hourly rate or compensatory time off. It seems to me that the most logical solution to the problem 1s to compensate the employee who is responsible for the Planning Commission minutes at $40 a meeting • or at the hourly rate Aich ever is greater. This solution, we hope, will be equitable and will tend to alleviate any reluctance to attend meetings of the Planning Commission. As you Mow in addition to taking the minutes, it is extremely difficult because of the technical nature of Planning Commission meetings to transcribe the minutes in a timely manner. 7 Unless we hear otherwise from the City Council, our recommendation will appear as a consry t item on the next City Council agenda. If you have any comments or questions, please contact either me or Jim. LMW:l k C V] MEMORANDUM DATE: November 27, 1979 TO City Council ? / ROM City Manager / SUBJECT Compensation r Planning Commission Secretary The attached cemo from Jack Lam to me outlines a problem which is of concern to us. As you are aware, shortly after incorporation we estab- lished a $25 per meeting compensation rate for the fecretary to the Planning tcmnission Unfortunately, since Planning Conmissimi meetings tend to last much longer than City Council meetings, it appears that the S25 rate on a per hour basis is inadequate. Jack has recommended that the compensation rate per meeting be increased fram $25 to S40 and that for any attendance at meetings lasting beyond 11 00 p.m. (nearly every meeting) the Community Development Secretary shall be compensated either at her hourly rate or compensatory time off It seems to me that the mast logical solution to the problem is to compensate the employee who is responsible for the Planning Commission minutes at $40 a meeting or at the hourly rate which ever is greater This solution, we hope, will be equitable and will tend to alleviate any reluctance to attend neefings of the Planning Commission As you know in addition to taking the minutes, it is extremely difficult because of the technical nature of Planning Commission meetings to transcribe the minutes in a timely ma-mer. Wiless we hear otherwise from the City Council, our recommendation will appear as a consent item on the next City Council agenda. If you have eny comments or questions, please contact either me or Jim. LMw lk I CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE December 5, 1919 Tot City Council & City Manager ,�t1� FROM: LlDyd Hubbs, City Engineer -A SUBJECT: RELEASE OF BOLAS Tract 9426 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the west side of Ranch Gate Roads north of Hillside Road Owner: Crowell /Leverthal, Inc. 1260 West Foothill Boulevard Upland, California 91786 Performance Bond (Road) $50,000 IIOTE The road construction has been anproved as being in accordance with the road 4mprovement olans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improve- ments Include curb, gutter, paving, walls and street signs Release of a paving deposit - Parcel flap 5515 Located at 9212 Garden Street Ommer: Ken Chase 92 2 Garden Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 01701 Paving Deposit - Encroachment Permit 1226 $75C CO LATE: the road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans an ^. it is recommended that the paving deposit be releas -A. FAA AS IN swimcc vwuup afel"WI, or "M QrWITUO ((.MN (IU /pR•Vli , NN \YIw. •IV ..YMI.M cry M1NMM1 \11MWM \W \YY.IYVYI . —� �ei�'�" ♦ — - j L r, �i i' sw �... I Y ..a .YwY• +YN •I .....• <t �v . • o � rw Y. •IC . rGe � u.. 1 Iw Y V• . L u ,W w..Y.w VY avE ar w..I.NYau ,• !• 3 .1 . Mrh Ml.l V�V \.n \!w•.w ^.� • ! YN.InII •Y 11 {LY •I I.•V!t w{ rn. \. •V J.w......Illw.yY 1111 • 1.•I YwM Ww A1..•M X41 Y! 34 0 3s. � � • }J f ♦ r � c.: t i \ 1 � •� G � lv � , � avE ' 3 Y • LIL /L/ GY nrNav -I �-�_• \7 r 34 i iv• co Y. 3s. � � • }J f ♦ r � c.: t i \ 1 � •� G � lv � , � avE DAL ,�7 i iv• i a Y. 'r Ir• L 7 \ • rw Yr 3s. � � • }J f ♦ r � c.: t i \ 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • M.EHORANCUM DATE, December 5, 1979 TO, city Council & City Manager FROM, Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT, SIGNALS AT BASE ALINEGANDD AGREEMENT AVENNUELANDUARCHIBALLD AND CMRCH STREET FOR Attached for Council execution is the City -State Agreement for the subject traffic signal installation and the authorizing resolution. This is the standard agreement required of all cities participating in the Federal Aid Urban Program. This project is currently being advertised for bids. RECOVIENDATION: approve the agreement and execute the It is recocmnded that the Council authorizing resolution. • Respectfully sugmitted, 4✓ B Hubbs Cit Engineer LBH:deb L 0 RESOLUTION NO.79 -100 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08 -5420 AND PROGRAII SUPPLEMENT N0. 1 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wishes to take advantage of Federal Aid Urban funding for the construction of signals at the intersections of Archibald Avenue and Church Street and Base Line and Hellman Avenue; and WHEREAS, said funding requires the execution of Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08 -5420 and Program Supplement No 1 by an authorized agent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approves the execution of Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08 -5420 rind Program Supplement No. 1 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on its behalf and transmit to the State for processing. PASSED, APPROVED, and .ADOPTED this 5th day of December, 1979. AYES: iMES: is ABSENT: 3 'T ATTEST: City Clerk 10 Mayor StArl W C.LLNO,M"UNNEU A 1,LkM&JAIN,N M1N 10k o. crown n. Cw DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4N,UNA,:INO.0 VCJN rtM • November 9, 1979 „ 1' 08- SBd- O-RCuc HG- 3041(65) Hr. Lloyd Hubbe City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Hr. Hubbe: Attached for your execution are two copies each of local Agency -State Agreement No. 08 -5402 covering all Federal -aid Projects and Program Supplement No. 1 for FAU Project HG- 3041(65) for signals and lighting at the intersection of Baselino/Hellman and Archibald /Church. Please type in the date of execution on each of the Agreements. After execution, return all original agreements along with an authorizing resolution to this office. After execution by the District Director an original of each agreement will be returned to you. Should you desire additional information about these documents, please call Hr. Fred Hielen at (714) 383 -4579. Vcry truly yours, J. E. PEDDY District Director BG John Feenatra Lo n& Assistance Coordinator a E 0 LfUL t(BICY-STATE UM E FOR rEOERAL -All) PRaIECTS 00 SOd Rancho Cucamonga Uistrict Lounty city AGREEHEUT 110. 00-5420 HAVER AGREEMENT THIS ALREMERT, rade in duplicate this day of , 19 , by and between the Lt of Ran n pooTTt ccaai subdivislon(s) of the State o �a orn a acre en ter rc erred to as 'LOCAL AGENCY% and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through the Department of Transportation, herinafter referred to as 'STATE'. WITIIESSET.,. WHEREAS, the Congress of the United States has declared It to be in the national interest for Federal Funds to be expended for highway, fringe parking, bicycle transportation, pedestrian walkways, and mass transportation projects; and WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of California has enacted legislation by which certain Federal funds authorized may be made available for use a local transportation facilities in accordance with the intent of Federal acts; and WHEREAS, there exists a compelling need for improvements or restoration of roads, streets, hi- hways, fringe parking, and public transportation facilities within the boundaries of LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, LOCAL AGEIICY and STATE therefore desire to make use of such Federal funds as may be made available within the jurisdictional boundaries of said LOCAL AGENCY; and WHEREAS, before Federal -aid will be made available for projects, LOCAL AGENCY and STATE are required to enter into an agreement relative to prosecution of the said project and maintenance of the completed facility. OH -OLA 255 (4 -77) 1 iIIEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: S ARTICLE I - CONDITIONS 1. Projects located in urbanized arr.zs (unless exempt) must be part of a program which serves to implement an areawfde plan held currently valid by the regional transportation policy board. 2. Federal r••nds may participate only in work which has been officially programed to and authorized by the Federal Highway Administration in advance of its performance. 3. Funds apportioned such as the STATE's share of FAS funds are considered Federal -aid funds. ARTICLE II - iRPROVEIiENTS /RESTORATIONS 1. The term 'IHPROVEHENI" o, 'RESTORATION' as used herein means any work that is financed in part with Woral funds. 2. The Sup.lemental Local Agency -State Agreement (program S supolement) shall be in a form prescribed by STATE; and shall designate who shall advertise, award, and adminl<ter the contract, the Federal funds rrguested, arJ the catching funds to be provided by LOCAL AGENCY, and, if a State Highway is involved, the matchiwg funds to be provided Fy STATE. Adoption of the program supplement by LOCAL AGENCf and approval by STATE s.wll cause such prograu supplement to be a part of this agreement as though fully set forth herelp Unless otherwise delegated the program supplement shall be approved by the IOCAL AGEUCY's governing body. Cooperative projects including work on a State highway shall be the subject of a separate concerative agreement. 3. In processipV 1'n'onVEIVITS or RESTORATIONS, LOCAL AGENCY will conform to all STATE statutes, renulations and procedures (in- cluding those set forth in the STATC's Locai '-mrams Manual) re- lating to the Federal -aid program and to all applicable rrderal laws, regulations, and Policy and Procedural or ,nstructlonal morora.,d- This includes, but is not limited to, the holding of public hearings when required, the oublishing of various Dress notices, a.,d the pre- paration of plans, specifications, and estimates 4 Unless otherwise designated in the approved program supple. ment, improvements will re constructed by contract In accordance with 9 OH -GLA 255 (4 -77 P • Certtf Scati or a �hetuseeof Specifications vdescribed in the State's cedures requ Certification; STATE approval of plans, special provisions and esti- mated threspectpto theerlght- ofzwayy Land advertisement forte minimum AGENCY of 3 weeks prior to Dtd opening. The contract will be awarded by LOCAL AGENCY, its to each or STATE as between 5, When the INPROVEMENT or RESTORATION includes work to be performed by a railroad, the contract for such work shall be entered into by LOCAL AGENCY or by STATE. as partiesworkemuz must have Prior - into tract entered into by LOCAL approval of STATE. In either event, LOCAL AGENCY Shall enter into an agreement ntcwith the sinstalledm under pro - an contract. 6. LOCAL AGENCY shall provide or arrange for adequate super- bysSTATE�. With heprior. State approval. surveying. inspection and awa may be performed by a consultin,) engineer provided an employee of LOCAL AGENCY is in responsible charge. 7. STATE shall exercise general supervision over Federal -aid improvements and ma s assume discretion, shall control over tthee. project full and whenever STATE, at responsibility to the United States so requires. LOCAL AGENCY cowtracts shall so stipulate. ARTICLE III - R1GiiTS -OF -WAY 1. ila contract for the construction of a Federal -aid iMPROYE- HENT or RESTORATION project shall be awarded until the necessary rights - of-way have been secured. Prior to the advertising of a proj- ect on a local street, LOCAL AGENCY shall certify and upon request shall furnish STATE with eviaence that neces,�ry rights- of-Way are available for construct on purposes or will be available by the time of contract award. 2. LOCAL AGENCY agrees to hold STATE harmless from any "a- bility Wh1ch may result in the event the right -of -way is not clear as certified. The includes, in additionrtos all 9ref right-of-way lo opertywrequired for the Improve- went fne and :tear of obstructions and encumbrances affecting the ON -OLA 255 (4 -77) 1 1 proposed project, the payment as required by applicable law of dam- • ages to real property nct actually taken but injuriously affected by the proposed improvement LOCAL AGENCY shall pay from its funds any costs winch arise out of delays to the contractor because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights -of- way have not been made available to the contractor for the orderly Prosecution of the mirk. 3. Subject to STATE approval and such supervision over LOCAL AGENCY's right-of-way acquisition procedures as STATE may determine Is necessary, LOCAL AGENCY may claim reimbursement from Federal funds for expenditures to purchase rights- cf-way included to an approved proj ec t. 4. The LOCAL AGENCY will :.cply with Title 11 and Ili of the Uniform Real Property Acquisition Policy. S. Whether or not Federal -aid is to be requested for right -of- way, should LOCAL AGENCY, in acquiring right -of -way for a Federal -aid 111PROVE "ENT, displace an individual, family, business, farm operation, or non - profit organization, relocation payment: and services will be provided as set forth in Chapter 5 of Title 23, U.S. Cade. TM public will be adequa ly informed of the relocation payments and vices which will be available, and, to the greatest extent practicable, no person lawfully occupying real property shall be required to nove from • his dwelling or to move his business or farm operation without at least 90 -days written notice from the LOCAL AGENCY. LOCAL AGENCY will pro- vide the State with specific assurance, on each project, that no person will be displaced until comparable decent, safe and sanitary replace- ment wousing is available within a reasonable per lod of time prior to displacement, and that LOCAL AGENCY's relocation program 1s realistic and is adequate to u -ovide orderly, tinely and efficient relocation of displaced persons for the project as provided in FlIPH 7 -s. ARTICLE IV - FISCAL PROVISIONS 1. When a Federal -afd 11s'ROVEIZENT or RESTORATION contract is to be awarded by STATE, matching funds will be provided by LOCAL AGENCY prior to the time that such funds are required to reimburse contracto•. STATE will bill LOCAL AGENCY for amount due Immediately following con- tract award, or at option of LOCAL AGENCY, will submit monthly bills during life of contract. 2. The estimated total cost of Federal -aid projects, the amounts of Federal -aid prograrvned, and the matching amounts agreed upon may be OH -OLA 255 (4 -77) -416-� ' adjusted by mutual consent of the parties hereto, provided funds are available to cover increases and provided Federal Highway Administration concurs in any increase in the Federal -aid. ). Upon submittal by LOCAL AGENCY of a statement of expenditures for Federal -aid improvedents. STATE will pay its agreed share and if permitted by State Law will advance an amount equal to the egal pro tion with Federal efunds or will voucher dFedealeHighway for l narticipa- for reimbursement. 4. LOCAL AGENCY shall use its own funds to finance the local .d ineligible for Inarwien Federalefunds. expenditures make Preitimate determination on ofge.igibility for Federal fund financing Ultimate determination shall rest with the F deral Highway Administration. Any overpayment if amounts due shall the returned to STATE upon decor d- 5 When a•ri portion of a LOCAL AGEIICY project is performed by STATE, therefor shall 8755 1 ofethesSta�tenAd ministrativebmanual. In The portion of such charges esE ot financed with Federal funds shall be paid trod funds of LOCAL 4. Should LOCAL AGENCY fail :n Gay 1 as m due STATE within j0 days of dewed or within sucl other period as my be a- eed between the parties hereto. STATE, acting through State nts Cortroller, may with- amount from future apportionre de LOCAL AGENCY from hold an equal the Highway Users Tax Fund. 7. Auditors of STATE and the United States shall be 9i * =^ access and Information as books and is requested records or the shall pLrposee ofivcheckirg costs paid. or to be paid by STATE hereunder. ARTICLE Y - HISCELLJnE" PROVISIONS 1. This agreement shall have no force or effect with respect s to any project unles {nistration ands prrograam Supplaer1ental Agree - the Federal Highway rent has been executed. 2. The Congress of the United States, the Legislature of the State of California, and the Governor o the State of California. each within their respective jurisdiction, have prescribed certain employment practices with respect to contract and other rerk financed OH-MA 255 (4 -77) I "5 with Federal or State funds. LOCAL AGENCY shall Insure that work per- formed under this agreement is done in conformance with rules and regulations embodying such requirements where ttr•y are applicable. Nondiscrimination Assurances, Exhibit •A•, are hereby considered a part of this agreement. 3. When Federal funds are to participate in the cost of work done by a consultant, the agreement or contract with the consultant may not be executed or awarded until the selectlwi of the consultant and the terms of the agreement or contract have been approved by STATE. Such agreement or contract shall include •i provision that the work and records of the consultant are subject to inspection at all HighwayeAdminist atfco and that agreementllor. contract rayhbefterminated by LOCAL h;ENCY upon a finding that the consultant is failing to live up to the terms of the agreement or contract. All rajor changes in the agreement or contract must have prior approval of the STATE. As soon as agreement or contract with consultant has neen awarded, two certified copies of said agreement or contract shall be submitted to STATE. 4. LOCAL AGENCY and its contractors shall retain all original records and documents relating to cork hereunder fivarced In part with Federal funds and shill make s.me avoilabte for Inspection by Federal settlement of the Project jectaccountsuwithrtheeFed^rallHtghwayfAdminis- tration, such records and documents may be microrrlmed at the option • of LOCAL AGENCY, but in any event shall be retainea for a three -year period after FIMA payment of final voucher, or a four rear period fret the date of final payrent under the contract, whichever is longer. S. (a) Neither STATE nor any officer or eeployee thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring b:, reason. of any- thing done or omitted to be done by LOCAL AGENCY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction delegated to LOCAL AGEIICY under this agreement, it is also understood and agreed that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895 4, LOCAL AGENCY shall Tully Indemnify and hold STATE harmless from any liability imposed for Injury (as definrd by Government Code Section 81o.8) occurring by reason of anything done or authoritycoreJuurrisdictionn AGENCY to LOCALiAGEtICYeunler this agreement. (b) Neither LOCAL AGENCY nor any officer or erployee thereof, shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. It Is also understood and agre d that, pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, STATE shall fully indemnify and hold l�1 I-? M N A nmm rA.711 .[ LOCAL AGENCY harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 010.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by STATE under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction not delegated to LOCAL AGENCY under this agreement. ARTICLE YI - MINTEIMACE 1. Upon acceptance by the awarding authority of a completed Federal -aid project or upon the contractor being relieved of the responsibility for maintaining and protecting a portion of the work, tie agency having jurisdiction over the transportation facility shall maintain the completed work In a manner satisfactory to the authorized representatives of the State and the United States. if, within 90 days after receipt of notice from STATE that a project on a transportation facility under its jurisdiction or any portion thereof, 1s not being properly maintained, LOCAL AGENCY has not satisfactorily remedied the conditions complained of, the approval of further Federal - aid projects of LOCAL AGENCY will be withhold until the project shall lave been put In a condition of maintenance satisfactory to STATE and the Federal 31ghway Administration. The provisions of this section shall not apply to a transportation facility which has been vacated • through due process of law. 2. The maintenance referred to in paragraph 1 above includes not only the physical condition of the facility but Its operation as well. Traffic Operations Improvements on local streets shall be main- tained by an adequate and well- trained staff of traffic engineers and technicians. Said maintenance staff may be employees of a LOCAL AGENCY, another unit of government or a consultant under contract with a LOCH, AGENCY. l.� ON -OLA 255 (4-77) 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT OA. District Director of ransportat on Approval Recommended: Local Assistance ng neer OH -OLA 255 (4 -77) 1n( CITY OF Rancho Cucamonga By mayor ATTEST: City Clerk COUNTY OF 7 By rman, Board of upery sors ATTESy Clerk of oa 0 • �I ,lfL' clall 11a10iSCRlYRNilOn ASSUM,CES (herelnaiter) Cuceogn a as a ton Lion to nt (1c11JCIT•f of Rancho R E from the California 0opartmc The he RE0 REF f Transportation, it ed to as t financial assistance artrrnt ° 4 70 Stat. 252• referr an Federal he U. S. OeP IgG , ling ofcTransportation, acting for t 4 `vii F•19hts Act Of t° as the ACT)• Title 49. Code of Federal will comply wi th 42iU S CI 20 0d- her°inafter re ursuant w pfftce rams of 42 U.S.C. 2000dcents irposed a °rrtation. SubtitleASS,sted Pr°9 rtnent of Transpo Federally- ,I of the Civil and all requ f Title TIOt15). the Regulations. Dc 1 tlondtscrioinat•Effectuatton o PEGUTA to the art Secretary• nk of Transportattonrrferred to as the directives. the DeDartme 1964 (hereinafter ertinent pertinent Fights Act of Act of 1973.O7d REfU�ATI6ttS, and other on the grounds Of Federal -aid III accor Y with the articfPation in, 5n accorrson n the United Stceeexcluded ffom 9discriminaticn end that orsan origin, ected to Federal directives. nsex, or national be otherwise subj IIT receives race, color, FFCIPIE Transportation• benefits °'•• °r for nirich t ejent of be denied pgram or activitltie Federal DeP r take any measures necessary under any D aired by subsectlan assisianctlCE T tt will assur re9 finand GIBS ASSURA This assurance is hEP.EOT °ft the aErfaR.A11011S. general assurance. to effectuate eba�e gene with respect 21.71x1 (1) and without limiting the assurances fore specifically and the following the fd:CIP1Et•� hereby gives ram: and each to its federal -aid Pra o -program n IEUT agrees that each) and 21.23 (b) e the Eti. conducted, 1, That ubsections 21.23 lrrogram') fiance defined in = h regard to a -program comPP AT10RS. the REGUlAT1WIS. will be lwat` facility') operated the RE to or rRE be (nth rega imp sed by, or pursuant to uireme tie following notification toth with all req insert t• trial sublect to the REC1PlEIT Shall work or rw { Program and. 2. that the for bids for wo Federal -a d ti ents: ions with the re in all I0:jSf de in 11 proposals for negotiated t9 FEGNATlOtd in all D in adapted DU -01A 255 (4-77) :� Aur•IIVIT E%II II' 1 T 'A' The otherapapp�ed lcontract ng as coro ty ere not es or • all bidders that it will affirmatively Insure th.L in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprises will be afforded full opportu- nity to submit bids In response to this invitation and will not be discrirvinated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award. Put the RECIPIENT shall insert the clauses of Appendix A Of th1, assurance in esery contract subject to the ACT and the REGUU..TI ONS. 4. That the clauses of Appendix B of this assurance shall be included as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting a transfer of real property, structures, or improvements thereon, or interest therein. S. That where the RECIPIENT receives Federal financial assist- ance to construct a facfllty, or part of a fac Ility, the assurance shall extend to the entire facility and facilities operated In connec. tion therewith. 6. That where the RECIPIENT receives Federal 'financial assist- ance in the form, or for the acquisition of real pn perty or an interest in real property, the assurance shall extend to riglts to space on, . over, or under such property. set 7. That the gCIPIENT shall include the appropriate clauses the lands in ane yfuture deeds. leases. npermits, licerses,r and isimilar agreements entered into by the RECIPIENT with other Arties: (a) for the subsequent transfer of real properly acquired or improved under the Federal -afd Progren; Ind (b) for the construction or use of or access to space on, over, or under real p- operty acquired, or h proved under the Federal -aid Progran. 6. That this assurance obligates the RECIPIENT tIr the period durinn Trhich Federal financial assistance is extended 0 the program, except where th• Federal financial assistance Is to pr vide, or is in the form Of, Pe-sonal property or real property or In crest therein or structures or improverents thereon, in which Case t' - assurance Obligates the Ricir1EUT or any transferee for If n longc- of the fol- lowing periods: j ..9 -oLA 255 (a -77) a ` AGREEMENT EXHIBIT •A• (a) the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits: or (b) the period during which the RECIPIENT retains own- ership or possession of the property. 9. The RECIPIENT shall provide for such methods of administra- tion for the program as are found by the U. S. Secretary of Transpor- tation, or the official to whom he delegates specific authority, to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, subgrantees, con- tractors, subcontractors, transferees, successors In interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed by. or pursuant to, the ACT, the REGULATIONS and this assurance. 10. The RECIPIENT agrees that the United States and the State of to California have a ter seek judicial enforcement with assurance. THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the RECIPIENT by the California Department of Transpor- tation, acting for the u. S. Department of Transportation, and is binding on it, other recipients, subgrantees, contractors, subcon- tractors, transferees, successors in interest and other participants in the Federal -aid Highway Program. I 2a OH -OLA 255 (4 -77) -11- AGUEHEUT EXHH'IT •A• APPENDIX A During the performance of this contract, the contractor, for itself, its assignees and successors in interest (hereinafter referred to as the C011fRACTOR) agrees as follows: (1) Com 'lance with Re ulations. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the regu at !Ions re at ve to non iscrinination in Federally - assisted programs of the Department of Transportation, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2', as they may be amxnded from time to time, (here- inafter referred to the REGULATIONS), which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract. (2) Uondiscrimination: The CONTRACTOR, with regard to the arork perfome�y c during the contract, 'hall not dis, Iminate on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in the s lection and retention of subcontractors. Including procurements of materials and leases of equipment. The CONTRACTOR shall not participate either directly or indirectly in the discrimination prohibited by Section 21.5 of the REGULATIOUS, including employment practices when the contract covers a program set forth in Appendix B of the REGULATIMiS. a ua rent: --- �per by competit ve Ilatc an or negot at on made by the CG,ITRACTOR for work to be pWornod under a subcontract, includinq procurements of materials or leas" of equiprnt, each potential suhcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the CONTRACTOR of the contractor's obligations under this contract and the 4EMIIL MOMS relative to nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. (4) Information and to orts: The CONTRACTOR shall provide all information an reports requ re�iby the REGULATIONS. or directives issued pursuant thereto, a• call permit access to its books, records, accounts, other sources of ,.. ormation, and its facilities as may bu determined by the State highway department or the Federal Highway fdministratlon to be pertinent to ascertain compliance with such REGULATIONS or directives. %sere any information required of a con- tractor is in the exclusive possession of another who falls or refuses to furnish this information, the C011TRACTOP shall so certify to the State hfyhway department, or the Fedrral Highway .Administration as appropriate, and shall set forth what efforts it has made to obtain the information. N Sanctinne for ::onto Rance. In the event of the COUTRACTORS's noncompliance wrtljo non scnG nnat ion provisions of this contract, M -OLA 255 (4 -77) 4�_ 3 I • AGREEMENT EXHIBIT "A' the State highway department shall am ra impose determtttertot sanctions beappropriate.t or the Federal Highway Administratiotn Y including. but not ltnited to: (a) withholding of payments to the CONTRACTOR under the contract until the CONTRACTOR campiies: and /or (b) cancellation. who einationortsuspension of the (6) incor oration of Provisions: The )FjlnT eryRSUbeontract,de tFrough the Drovts ons o paragraprs rocurements of materials and leases ^f equipment• et unless . including procurements directives issued pursuant tsubcontract exempt by the PEGULATIOtIS. The C011TRACTOR shall Lake such action ortthe Febia or procurement as the State highway Y horever. that. to the Administratiln may direct as a means of enfor h such Provisions eluding sanctions for noncompliance: Provided. or event a contractor beccmes involy inns a result Ofesuch directionr.a- tion uith a subcontractor or supplier the COIITRACTCR ray request the State highway department to enter Into in addition. such ONTRACTORlitigations aay request protect thethe Unitedinterests States toeen ere and- the C into such litiga- tion to protect the interests of tine United States. Ci.MA 255 (4-77) 3 Ff1U IIENT EXIII ^IT 'A" •-WERDIX B . The followinq clauses shall be included in any and all deeds effecting or recordln4 the transfer of real Property, structures or improvenronts thereon, or interest therein from the United States. (GRNIT1116 CLAUSE) (1014, THEREFORE, the Department of Transportation, As authorized by lad, and upon the condition that the RECIPIENT will accept title to the lands and maintain the project constructed thereon, In accordance with Title 23, United States Code, the regulations for the Adninis- tration of Federal Aid for Ilighuays and the Policies and nrocedures prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration of the Oepartrent of Transportation and, also in accordance with and in compliance with the Pegulations pertaining to and effectuating the provisions of Title V1 of the Civil nights Act of 1964 (76 Stat. 252; 42 U.S.C. 20001 to 20ODd -4) does hereby remise, release, quitclaim and convey unto the RECIPIERT all the rinht, title and interest of the Department of Trans- portation in and to said lands described in Edulblt 'A' attached here- to and made a part hereof (NMENDMI CLAUSE) 0 TO HAVE AHD TO HOED said lands and interests therein unto the RECIPIENT and its successors forever, subject, however, to the covenant, conditions, restrictions and reservations herein contained as follows, which will remain in effect for the period during which the real prop- erty or structures are used for a purpose for which Federal financial assistance is extended m for another nurpose Involving the provision of similar services or benefits and s:+all be binding on the RECIPIEIIT, its successors and assigns. The rECIPIEHf, in consideration of the conveyance of said lanes and interests in lands, does hereby covenant and agree as a covenant running with the land for Itself. Its successors and assigns, that (1) no Person shall on the grounds of race, color, or national origAn, he excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or he otherwise Subjected to discrininatfon with regard to any facility located wholly or in part on, over, nr under such lands hereby conveyed (.) (and)* VH -(1LA 255 (4 -77) -14- �� • rGRECIEHT EX111817 •A• APPENDIX P (2) inalands soCconveyed. in compliance nwith n Interests allrequfre- aents inposed by or pursuant to Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations, Department of Transportation, Subtitle A. Office of the Secretary. Part 21, Hon - discrimination in Federally - assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - Effectuation of Title 1964, and as (j and (3) that in the event of breach of any of the above - mentioned nondiscrimination conditions, the Department of Trantportation shall have a right to re -enter said lands and facilities on said land, and the above de- scribed land and facilities shall thereon revert to and vest in and become the absolute property of the Deparbnent of Transportation and Its assigns as such Interest existed prior to this deed.* *Reverter clause and related language to be used only when it is determined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of Title Y1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1954. DIi -OLA 255 (4 -77) -15- a� At,PLIJ:EHT MIT .IT W APFENDIA C The following clauses shall ;e includtd in any and all deeds, licenses, leases, permits, or similar instrtsnants entered into by the RECIPIENT, pursuant to the provisions of Assurance 7(a) The (grantee, licensee, lessee, pemittee, etc , as appropriate) for himself, his heirs, personal representaLlves, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree (in •he case of deed; and leases add 'as covenant running with the land`) that In the event facilities are constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the said property described in this (deed, license, lease, permit, etc.) for a purpose for which a Department of Transpor- tation program or activity is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. the (grantee, licensee, lessee, pemittee, etc.), shall maintain and operate such facilities and services in compliance with all other rerairements imposed pursuant to Title 49, Code of federal Regulations, Department of Transpurtation. Subtitle A. Office of Secretary, rart 21. Nand i scrini nation rederally- assisted proaraws cf the 'iepartnent of Transrortation - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and as sa'd Regulations wray be amended. (Include in licenses, leases, permits, etc.)* That in the event of breach of an-, of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the RFCIPIEIIT shall have the right to terminate the (license, lease. Permit. etc ) and to re-enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, and hcid the same as If said (license. lease, permit, etc.) had never been made or Issued (Include in deeds)- That in the event of breach of any of thu above nondiscrimination covenants, the RECIrl EfR shell hage the right to re -enter said land and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities shall thereupon revert to and vest in and become the absclute property of the RECIPIENT and its assigns. The following shall be Included in all deeds, licenses, leases, pemits, or similar agreement, entered Into by the CECIPIEW. pursuant to the provisions of Assuranc,• 7 (b) • Peverter clause and related language to be us-•d only Idwen it is determined that such a clause Is necessary in order to effectuate the nurposes of Title VI of the Civil :lights Act of 1964. ON-OLA 255 (4 -77) -16- 2 -7 10 • AGREEMENT EMIIDIT 'A' APPENDIX C TM (grantee, licensee, lessee, permittee, etc., as approprlate) for himself, his personal representatives, successors in interest and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, does he eby covenant and agree (in the case of deeds, and leases add 'as a covenant running with the land•) that: (1) no person on the ground of race, color, sex, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subj,!cted to discrimination in the use of said facilities, (2) that in the construction of any Improvements on, over, or under siich land and the furnishing of services thereon, no person on the ground of race. color, sex. or national origin 0411 be ex- cluded from participation in, denied the berefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination, (3) that the (grantee, licensee, lessee, pernfttee, etc.,) shall use the premises in canpliance with the Regulations. (Include In licenses, leases, permits, etc.)* • That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrimination covenants, the RECIW'ff shall have the right to terminate the (license, lease, permit, etc.) and to re -enter and repossess said land and the facilities thereon, >nd hold the sacs as if said (license, lease, permit, etc.) had never been made or issued. (include in deeds)' That in the event of breach of any of the above nondiscrinination covenants, the RECIPIENT shall hair the right to re -enter said land and facilities thereon, and the above described lands and facilities shall thereupon revert to and vest in and tecome the absolute property of the RECIPIENT, and its assigns. • Reverter clause and related language to be used only shen it is detemined that such a clause is necessary in order to effectuate the purposes of Title VI of the Civil Rights A t of 1964. �l Oil -OLA 255 ( 4-71) GV E City of Local Agency Rancho Cucamonga Suop ecenc o._�__ To Local Agency -State Agreement No. 00 -5402 PR06RAM OF (teat. frary FEwm Am Umi Srsmi PmK -crs iII TIE CITY Oh RANCHO CUCAN;INGA Loco a=gency Pursuant to the Federal Aid for Urban Systems Acts, the attached "Progran• of Federal Aid Urban System Projects narked 'Exhibit D" is hereby incorporated in that Master Agreement for the Federal -Aid rrogran which was entered into between the above naeed LOCAL IGEUCY and the STATE on , and is subject to all of the terms and conTrtions thereof. The subject program is adopted in accordance with Paragraph 2 cf Article It of the aforencntioned agreement under authority of Cty /Od %)( Resolution Uo approved by the City Council/ OddfJXdA ' kleigd 1 on (See copy attached). K ~Iu a n City of Rancho Cucamonga a local Agency Ec3 d By, 71CIo a e Approved for State Attest: [Icr). (j �a OLatrsce Direct, of 774nsportation Data District OR Oepartnent of Transportation Faro DII -OLA -411 (2/73) K ~Iu a n Y� m_ K W t CL • u L t L i 1 l • E Ny O w O O L Yy C Y u A 3 z C 6 �p K 6 O• n L d G O y O oA W -. m w Y Y 7Q' a o "w oW-0 m V W A d Y Z50• C F T m u oi.�mo e m Y M M Y O MM J C O w 8 Omww V u V O. O .au mom mwd PY ..tlj 4 m CN O. 0.0 u a V uu m C O AVO 0a u 4 tl Cua o w 4 O c a u q +1 Y 1�1J1 q w m Z O O m 0 9 O C > °gY o O C O C tl O.+ u m Y BYO O C ti C u qM q e q H G 4 ¢ m Y w , .r w O 4 O 4 O m N 0 A C A r L D 9 u 0 n m An d O ti .I n r N .y 1 c i N L ` Elk &ou C SFy ES � 6 4 y {OVA K N u M e O W O s o b W y i az w u N Y N O 0 b b A ti O M C O C M to 'i A V L• o Ao w V q0 C OCO q L O C A C U C A d m d oue�w.+N 9 O d C> d qua �4 �•d C d 0 4 y u q O D) C d N u C C q ^• CC�gCL U VEC d•-L L O + m S 4 u N O Yf M .V.. u e d o o r L i W -. m w Y Y 7Q' a o "w oW-0 m V W A d Y Z50• C F T m u oi.�mo e m Y M M Y O MM J C O w 8 Omww V u V O. O .au mom mwd PY ..tlj 4 m CN O. 0.0 u a V uu m C O AVO 0a u 4 tl Cua o w 4 O c a u q +1 Y 1�1J1 q w m Z O O m 0 9 O C > °gY o O C O C tl O.+ u m Y BYO O C ti C u qM q e q H G 4 ¢ m Y w , .r w O 4 O 4 O m N 0 A C A r L D 9 u 0 n m An d O ti .I n r N .y 1 c A EXHIBIT B Page 2 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will advertise, award and administer this project. • 3 Unless determined otherwise by San Bernardino County's Cooperative Process Committee, the actual funds for the project will be set Li vn the basis of contract prices after the bids for the work have been opened. In awarding or agreeing to award the contract, the City agrees the payment of Federal Funds will be limited to the Detail Estimate amount approved by the FHHA in the Federal -Aid Project Agreement (PR -2), or its modification (PR -7A), and accepts any increases to City Funds. 4. The use of Federal Funds for this project is subject to the project bein7 selected as part of the multi -year FAU Program for San Bernardino County s portion of the LA /LONG rdach Urbanized Area S Should higher priority projects cause Increase or decrease to the Federal funds available, this project will be financed with the maximum Federal funds available tr the County. 6 Should additional Federal Funds become available to the City, this amount will, at the City's request, be increased to the amount available but not to emceed the maximum legal Federal prorata share with a corresponding decrease in the matching funds. 7 In accordance with Section 86 -2 14 of State Standard Specifications for tsstinn controllers, the Local Agency agrees to pay their share of the cost of testing • 8 The availability of Federal Funds will be subject to meeting deadlines and /or other conditions as may be imposed by the Director upon the recom- mendation of the FAU Advisory Committee 3' t F • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATEt December S. 1979 TO: City Councu & City Manager PROM, Lloyd Hubbs. City Engineer SUBJECTS VACATION or ALDER STREET (Offer of Dedication) At the City Council meeting of November 21, a Resolution of Intent to vacate the offer of dedication for Alder Street was passed and a public hearing date of Dececber S. 1979 was set. Because it was not possible to meet legal requirements for advertising and posting of the notice for the street vaca- tion, the public hearing has been continu.•d to the Council greeting of December 19, 1979. All other parties involved have been notified of the change of date Respectfully submitted, • Lloyd 6. Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb f-1 eJ 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: December 5, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROti: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SU03ECT: PARCEL AAP 4957 The attached resolution accepts the bonds, agreement and parcel map for development at the southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman Avenue. The development consists of 3 acres and 3 lots The street improvements are to be installed in accordance with the approved street improvement plans The bond amounts are as follows: Performance Bond (Letter of Credit) S161004) Labor 6 Material (Letter of Credit) 515,000 • REWNENDATION: E, ii It is recommended by the City Engineer that the attached resolution be approved by the City Council This approvjl will enable the City Clerk to sign the map and agreement, the Mayor to s gn the agreement and the City Engineer to approved the mop for recording. (RJRaessp /eecctttffuulll}ly ssub`nitted, Lloy B Hubbd' s City Engineer LBH:deb 23 '3 Jis 0 0 J • / ! Ti . uni 11 • 3� 2 a r n V �.4 A• f'!J q�r �r +{4,G . ko 1~ .�k a r lK it ^,tg r�4 RESOLUTION NO. 13 -101 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALLIFORNIA. APPROVINGHPARCEL AY y!a9ER :357, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT. AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4957, sub,itted by Doug Hol.c, and consisting of three parcels, located on southeast corner of I south aRanges7iwest wasnapprovedsbynthe City Section City Township Rancho Cucamonga on March 15, 1979; and. WHEREAS. Parcel Map Number 4957 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and. WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the f1m.1 map by the City Council of said City have nor been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by Doug Hone as developer; NOW, THEREFORE. BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and • said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4957 be and the same is same to hereby to be Engineer is to present PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT: ATTEST: Ei ty er 3S — —Fgyy- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATEt December 5, 1979 TO: City Council 5 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: TR1CT 9567 The subject tract map was originally submitted by Tavis L. Manning. The County gave tentative approval an February 17, 1977 The map and grading plan originally approved by the County has been revised to reflect City requirements as to street size and lot grading The tract consists of 33 lots covering approximately 8.3 acres at the northwest comer of Highland and Hermosa Avenues. The Cu,amonga County Hater District has notified the engineering staff that their requirements have been met The developer has made financial arrangements with the City and Water District for the installation of • the streets, water and sewer facilities. The developer, Lewis Horams of California, has bonded for the following inprovenent securities amounts: performance Bond `Road $156,000 Labor b Material (Road $156,000 Cash hbnumentation Bond $ 3,350 RECOMMENDATION: The City Engineer recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the subject map and improvement securities for street installation Resyectful ly� , to B. Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb 24 ?RAC? N o 9561 LEWIS ND Mts 45SDLIA�ED EAlGS ', IM LAMMIb On11AC10 ell �r ,;.rf11 CR•R. t4ACTS -' 8 to { { u L4 zz 7+• y r N • it :r Z11 , q IL � tt to •. h -- LlHlsatty • �u tic ' a • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IHPROVEIIENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO 9567 WHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No. 9567, consisting of 33 lots, submitted by Lewis Homes of California Subdivider, located at the northwest co-nir of Highland and Hermosa has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient improvement security, and submits for approval said Final Hap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows, 1 That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City, the City Clerx is authorized to attest thereto; and, 2 That said Improvement Security is accepted as goar and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and, 3 That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City aATTEST PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of_, 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT City Clerk X77 v yor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATEt December 5, 1979 TO, City Council 8 City Manager PROMS Harry EmpeY, Finance Director SUBJECT, POLICE CADET RECLASSIFICATION The current cETA positions at the Sheriff's Police Department will be tosestablish absalary range consistenth with a likespositions 6nderctheary it will be county Pay plat•• It has been determined that the work teing nerformed by the pecple currently holding the CETA Positions, at the Sheriff's Department are consistent with Police Clerk II's and II1's and an appropriate salary than Police ele0 11's snandtIII '%eitaistconsistentgwith the city sr pay schedule for similar duties being performed. . It is also felt that many personnel problem cou ld 6e avoided if salaries were brought into tine so as to be appropriate for responsibility. Res ecct ull ubYmiiitttted, Hat y EapeY Finance Director I HE:deb 1 3i L 1. INTER- OFFICE MF,NO DANE November 21, 1979 • FROM Thomas Uickum, Captain PHONE 989 -6611 _slW Rancho Cueownga Sheriff's Station QO Lauren Wasserman, City Hanger City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT Job Classification for Police Clock DEFINITION: Under general supervision or direction the police clerk wi' perform a variety of responsible and confidential clericp work. D.STIYCUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: The duties of this class involve the responsibiliqq difficult and confidential clerical activities. Th. le raquire considerable knowledge of the subject matter . clerical duties involved. • EXAMPLE OF DUTIES: Reties of this position may include, but are not limited tq the following: 1. Assists the public by giving out a wide variety of in- formantion requiring discretion based on legal restraints and ggood judgment. Presents regulations and procedures of tY.a department to the public. 2. Answers requests for emergency assistance and relays the appropriate information to communication center for dis- patch of officer. Thin requires a great deal of discre- tion, judgment and poise. 3. Operates office machines and equipment requiring spe- cialized training. a. Runs teletypes for various types of information of a highly confidential nature. 1% Enters, researches and retrit ,es informa..icn on computer of a highly confider. al nature. 4. Receives and receipts conies taken from the sale of traffic accident reports. 5. Receives all incoming correspondence, reviews and routes to proper party. Answers routine correspondence rela- ting to traffic accident reporte, court appearances, etc. IAUUOJO •w. I //1 � - Memo to Lauren Wasserman, City Manager November 21, 1979 Page Two 6. Performs clerical dut as regulated by statute which • carry a high deg_ae of liability with them. a. Subpoenaes for court appearances, processin warrants for arrest, is responsible for notifica- tions of vehicle storage, recovery and impounds and maintains 60 day non - sufficient funds check file as required by law. 7. Typea material from written, recorded or printed sources for rough draft, corrected or finished form. 8. Maintains files on all reports taken and citations issued. 9. Maintains specialized projects and files such as fingerprints, mug photographs, accident trends and crime patterns. 10. Retrieves and maintains records on various statistical reports. Must use discretion in recognizing and correcting discrepancies. 11. May provide vacation or temporary relief as required. REQUIRM -MNTS: . 1. Typing speed of 45 words per minute. 2. Good knowledge of office practices, procedures and equipment. 3. Correct spelling, punctuation and gra mar. 4. Good understanding cf basic mathematical process. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS: 1. Basic knowledge of state and I)cal laws. 2. Have the ability to verform clerical vox which requires speed and accuracy and .nvolves some individual judgment. 3 Have the ability to effectively meet the public in s4tuations requiring tact and poise. 16) TW:jes L14 I ORDINANCE NO. 78 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING IN ITS ENTIRETY ORDINANCE No. 78 RELATING TO REGULATING THE STORAGE, USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SIS7E FIREWORKS WITHIN THE CIT" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City COUncfl Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia does hereby ordain as follcds: SECTION 1: Ordinance No. 78 of the City Of Rancl.o Cucamonga, —ca1*iforn_a, relating to regulating the storage, use and sale of safu and sane fireworks within the City of Rancl'O Cucamonga, in hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the CT—ty-TTe-r-1Z shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same Lo be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, et least once in The n���aiil�lyy Re�ortt, a rswspaper of general circulation, publlaa ed�t7:a City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cu =onga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of 1)79. AYES: NOESt ABSENT: ATTESTt 3 City Clerk Mayor of e City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 CITE DP RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEIORANDRY Dater December S, 1979 To: City Council and City reneger From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: CEdFAAL PUN A`Db?DNEhT N0. 79 -03E end 79 -031 - CITY OF RANCRO CLXAMUNGA - A change in the present designstlom of the property on the northwest corner of Baseline Road and Haven Avenue to conform with the property as it is currently developed ABSTRACT: on November 14, 1979, the Planning Commission recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 79-03E and General Plan Amendment No. 79 -031, sluci- fically to amend the Land Use Map at the northwest corner of Sasellae Road and Haven Avenue from medium density residential to low density residential and to amend the laud use map for the property beginning at a point 600' west of Haven on the north side of Baseline extending approxieacely 670' along Bseel'ne from low density residential to medium density residential. Those two amendments are basically administrative adjustments to the Land Use Map. When the map was ori- ginally prepared, there was an oversight and a mislabeling of the proposed lam. • Uses Since the northwest comer of Baseline Road and Haven Avenue is developed as single family, the Planning Commission recommends that this area be designated as low density residential. Adjacent to this single family tract is the mobilehome parka portion of which in designated as low density residential. The Planning Com- mission recommends that the CI Council change the designation from low density residential to medium density residential E3 Both of the changes recommended by the Planning Commission would bring the General Plan into conformance with the property as it has been developed. Please refer to the attached exhibits for additional information. RECDNNENDAITON: The Planning Cemiction recommends that the City Council approve General} Plan Ammdamnt No 79 -03E and 79-03I Reap ctfullq ubmitted, J IJI��� Director of Comeynity Development JL: BKH: ten Attachments: Existing Dana Use, Zoning, and Genaral Plan Maps Part 1, Initial Study 43 I* M ui ui z 11_ t1 II Jul i I - {Q - -� Z € = C �J� k= a) M� w c� r a� w z {Q - -� Z € = C �J� k= Q uJ 4�.Jl ��7<, - v t 1 oc < ` t 1°ry1l -- in IL r ' S Q uJ 4�.Jl ��7<, - v t 1 oc < ` t 1°ry1l -- in IL r L—J C c M c r - - C4 via }- Q 1 0 {1rt .• �-t-r 1.rtt- "0 u =:� _ '�'�i .1�i1-���• j �'-•I: ���l��j*�,,�� >�S; `�`'4,�.1y a li i- :-,�-,I� I � �� .. r r • CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIONCA INITIAL STUDY • PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted ro the DQ'elarmnt Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part 11 of the Initial Study. The Dtvelopeent Icvlev Committee will meet and take action no later ehan tan (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no enviror ntal impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmertal impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: G?A _ -79-03 E ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TD D'o ODUCEIVII14C THIS PROJECT: 7b N LOCATION OF PROJECT (STRCET ADDRES!' AIM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PER/ITTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF AND FEDERAL AGEGCTE3 AND TILE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH aER•NITS: 7-1 47 ■ r. • PROJECT nCSCRIPTION In �J DESCRIFTICN Of PRLJELTt ACREAGE OF PROJECT AP.EA AND SOUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSFO DUILDMrS, IF ANY: QlyL.artm a��( !� aere< �f xt�tna doe�twat n'f' DESCRIPE THE ENVIRONVEMAL SLTTII :G OF TILE FRO.7E-T .;ITE INCLUCI!70 INITMMTIO!7 ON TOPOGN-krNy, PL917TS (TREES, , ANI!IALS, AI,'Y COLTUF.1L, HISTORIC4L'R SCENIC ASPECT.:, USE Cr SVRr("'MING I JPERT IES, AND T11F. L °SCRIPTION OF A,7y EXISTING STRUCTUP_4S AID THEIR USE 'A` ^ACH NECESSARY 'HEETS): Is �!.' ;•:. r -et, part of a larger prolcct, one of o seriee Of cum i t :c a -done, wtich althouglF individually small, may as a u'x le have sI I ITant environmental !impact? ��S`- rt_ -J.1 Z C�Li'° n e •f V ft^ t)r'oaY+Wl '7' Q f- f -- NI .t T IIS rmarCT: OVN YES in 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? )cc 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 4, 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, suwage, etc.)! X4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? K5: Remove any existing trees? How many? I 6. create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamsables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above) P;e /c et^ IMPORTAW: If the protect involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. w CERTIrIC \TIOH: I hereby eettirl that the statements furnisheC above aou in th- attached exhibits present the data and inforr,tcon required for this initial evaluation to the `lest ot ^,y it tIt [;, ind that th, feet etatemonts, and irforrition pr- -onted are tr, -,- a•d correct to the best of my lnVWledge ,ni belief I furth•r understand tint odds innal inr, roitirn riy 1,, trqu red to he submitted before an idrj,,,�te evaulotton can bL made by the aevelorr:ent Rcv!.I. ;O"ittce T Date, 3/ '9� signature -t_ oL� �. Titleea R£SIDMMAL CONSTMICCIOV The follovinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucaaonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Nanc of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Pioject: 1. Numcer of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest dato of occupancy: nodal a and ! of Ten *ative S. Dedroons Price Rake PRASr I PRASE 2 Pnvr. ] PRASE 4 TOTAL SOT_4 rte• i ql�j r �!) i r fir+ r_ � —r--- _ I -- � sl ■ N rA s CL C C7 x •— w N w rl I' Nat! I� I 1'f r-n*--, 11'Tinit r�yr� ti OG 1 I• C a NI Nan � X W I � tr r 1 Q r Fr T y X11 OG 1 I• C a NI Nan � X W r Fr T y X11 .iJ � N, .• f✓( 1 i �c i 1 J r 1 SL • u ■ O� 2 I 1 ! 3N r,r I� trty U L m a ca m -I C7 CO W a� 0 0 c�L� Inrm PAI 1—t CIII OF R,%N'HO CUOdtiYiGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFOMIATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70 00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must: be completed and submitted to the DavelopWnt Review Committee through the department where the project application is made Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepara Part II of the Initial Study. The ewvel�rnent Review Committee will meet and take action no laror than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of thren determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impacE and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, cr 3) An additional information report should be supplies by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: 6-ptor �i-032 APPLICAN 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAIIE, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE C014TACTED CONCERNING TUIS PROJECT- e...,c. 4.nOn RL.Bo� LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 110.) LIST. OTIIFR PEP. ITS i1ECESS,,RY rron LOCAL. REGIONAL. STATE AHD FEDERAL AGENCIES ACID THE AGENCY ISSUIUG SUCH PEMIITS: M. A I -1 • PROJCCT DESCRIPTION VESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ¢PP:rsjmately 20.6 ACV-6f C+ 14"a ACREAGE OF PROJECT ARFA AIID SQUARE �Q07 OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANy: �!ob.lP Marne �arif e0arc DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON'_�TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCIADING INFORMT10% ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPFCTS, UEE OF SURROUNDING PROPER ^IES, AND THE DFSCR•r'• IF 'My EXISTING STRUCTURES AND HEIR USE (ATTAC' 1Y SHrETS) rn. .0 n•i•Ir. r%.ru elag "T ri1 ._• ncuhio - i.i YSy Myl Pr. r,.. Lf@ fH[)r. 1,nM -p �_'1-v�o.7 .- e.•e.�. ?N•f"S Is the pro sect, part of a larger proleet, one of a series Of cunulct,vc actions, whic' altho.rgh individually s•.mll, may as a whole have sign.r.cant environmental impact? .1 h I I- I .C6 • WILL TN75 PR0,7L'CT: YES No Create a substantial ground change in • contours? Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)!. _ 4. create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? �u. Create the need for use or disposal of_ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTA7r: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CCRTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the date and information rcouirPd for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, ann that the facts, statements, and Information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowlcdg± and b ^lie_'. I further undez stand tln t additional information mal be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Oavelopxnt Review committee. Date 4L 9 Signature 1: .3 7 CITy OF RAN=O CUCAMOMA mmRANDLN Date: December 5. 1979 To: Gity Council and City Manager From: .lack I=, Director of Co®uaity Development Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND GENERAL. PLAN AMENDMENT No. 79 -03F - L*Ty OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Raqut^t to clarify the meanLig o °. Alternative Coggsacclal Sites pBSTR tCI: On November 14, 1979, the Planning Cmmission approved Lescluti.la Na "9 -b7 recoamandivd approval of the amendme.t yon :,1arlfieatioa of Alternative Coeaerclal Sites. The Intent of this ®mdmet is to create more Clexibllity and the designation of Alternative Ccmrercial Site and ro more clearly deflna thy desf naci_ on of Alternative Comaercfal Sites Approval is recomendeC DISCUSSION: There are basically three types of commercial centers: 1) ceighbor- hood center, 2) types oficenterse,me ghborhoodland community tAttttached, centers the fire[ two tyD find excerpts ftoo planning t=ign canters bThese a elonlyageneraltcriteriaa. A neighborhood centers and Co ®unity neighborhood center my be sma'_ m ler thou the indicated tccee or larger than the • indicated acreage The same is true with the cog center. ter. What really defines of center is a Rancho Cucamonga act s cocmunityicee how functions Many Currently the Interim Central Plan designetes 23 Alternative COameycial Sites; this includes the Alternative Areas A, B and C. Not all of throe sites are viable eoeer- cfal shopping center sites There are some Intersections that corners ore designated as alternative commercial sites and others where only 1/4 of the intersection is designated. In order to provide aa::imum flexibility in the Planning arOGPSB we suggest the intersection be denoted as AlternativecCetmmeet with a at of two centers at any eve intersection. Further. set be should b per intersection. lest 1/2 mile apart except for the two that we Bugg 6. Attabe plaeedla[f the intersection is sac ugage, You will voce that an asterisk ched You Exhibit 1: combines the asterisks on the northwest, douchwest, Bad southeast carvers of Foothill Blvd and Vineyard Ave ue Into t Of one asterisk overlaying the Blvd- and Vineyard Avenue. Route Exhibit 2: Eliminates d ArchibalddAvenue�Bad replaces the asteriskrwithANeighbor- hood a�• on Se that[theacenter The reason for under development- Exhibit pmentek cltnlna- Exhibit 3: :e as er a refie'ineerstctlt�tt- 1Ek�"— O� g,� a d wwey Av •tom adds n asterisk at the intern tfoon of Turner Avenue and At= use , R1 e£aeetlo�'of ess"aSi:2t'? 58 Exhibit 4: Combines the asterisk north of ghland Avenue on the east and eat side of Haven Avenue int one asteriok located midway betwee ighland Avenue and Lemon A nue on Haven In the past we have 1 ally interpreted the ex ing asterisk on the west aide of Haven rth of Highland to include the property from Ivy Highland to Lemo Avenue. Because of this interpretation we have a proposed d opment in the planning stages now on the southwest comer of L n and Haven. The Planning Commission recommends that the City until designate this property of approximately six acres as ighborhood Community This designation would reinforce S f Is previous interpretation. Exhibit 5: Combines the asterisk on the southweaL corner of Rochester and Baseline and the northwest comer of Baseline into one asterisk over the intersection of Baseline Avenue and Rochester Avenue. Exhibit 6: Combines the asterisk on the four corners of Etivands Avenue and Baseline Avenue into one asterisk over the intersection of Baseline and Etiwanda Avaauea The asterisk on the southwest comer of Highland and Etivanda Avenue is relocated to the inter - section of Highland and Etivanda Avenues In addition to these adjustments of the land use map, the Planning Commission racom- mends that th following changes occur within the General Plan Text: 1. Alternative Commercial Asterisks shown on the General Plan are only general locations and show that there Sa a potential for the location of shopping centers In that immediate area Deperding upon the size of the property and the market area served the commercial center nosy be either neighborhood or community 2. No more than two commercial centers are to be located at any one inter- section 3. For neighborhood centers sites should fall within the approximate size range of 3 m 8 acres cod for a community shopping center, sites should fail within the approximate range of 10 _o 30 acres. 4 Commercial centers should be located at least 1/2 mile apart except for the two allowed at intersections REC"ENMATiON: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the combination of me asterisks into one asterisk overlaying the intersection and the ldentifimti& of two areas as neighborhood comurtry and the elimination of certain asterisks as stated above. Rasp tfylly suBnitt I I _j I V � r V i JACK I.A.M. Director of Community Development JL:BKH:mm Attachments: Land Use Matrix F General Plan Land Use Map i. Part I, Initial Study 59 r — NE16Ntl1oKHOOD ... DEN. t 1 GoMM.� S�NOpI 1 LoW ` 1 DENSITY MIXZD rltvs0 MtxeD USF- USE Fc MucEO < Mso USC K LGb! D�{SI DCNSrrY MI N' 1 � � , Xlt00fr LOW LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY Fc. OEtlsITY LoW OEN5ITY J MSD Dem.. FcRvlcE HIaH : CaMMW2ClAL �ENSIT ( fMl•n.l H • b 5E"CE MI %EO CCWM. USE � DEQIS Tr Fc 0 1 L MEOIUM ui O LOW OeNSiTY CENStT`( XI OENStr( If co If cero wFAIRY MINIMUM DENIMPACT INDUCTRY ExHIBIi I Low DENSITY SCHOOL LOW DENSITY SEKYICE Lob/ DENSITY SCHOOL LOW w DENSITY I;I DE IT`( I I D u6 TY d MEDI✓NI VfW61TY LOW x PARK cE s1TC M51-Ty f SERVICE CoMMEItCIALI ISB&VICB COflMPMCIAL FWTMLL M1 vo SERVICE COMMeRCIAC ScRY((1 ..JJ LO W vwr lTY "V I M6DHJe1 OEU51TY DBNs1TY w, y FHGN f' 3 gErISITT /nu+s1•PvguG r 6 l MIXED use i -u it s s DaulTr euslir AI- �RNAT1bE tl4X.4S AMA • COW DEN511Y COW c R DWSITY , - ' ALTEKNATNE FG LOW S L04/ DENSITY '1wIMVM IMPA T DeN5" INDUSTIFy J� �. MIxBD UsE`' tiU COMMeACAAL .11.11 c� �n MICED Use- MINIMUM MINIMUM IMPK-T (NDVSTRY MED. ; MEOtvM � DENSITY : LOW DENSITY h N �� MEDIUM' E� MA�oR A:C� `.'ENSITY D f3 INDVSTRY k ? z l E ' ` WW LOW, •t{CM IWR VErISIT S CAW DiNSITY QARK T� MA)oR F, INDUSTRY s �xHlet7 3 LOW w LOW DBN6ITY x v� OENSIr( i Zia I ;*� LOW DcN .iIr( O E SCHOOL i.o W 0�►IsITr MEOIVM I LOW IMEO1vM %Nalrf PEU51TY CcUSITY 41. 1 .Y LOW C)CNSITY (03 MIMP v5E -- , I . ALTWHA -ME AIC MAAMVE ALTERNATIVE ExHIJI—, 4- Ll 3- Z (;,03 Fr, VERY LOW LU61TY 3 LOW pENS1T�' J YNaa z v 3 Low c � peNSl'tY � 3 LOW J D2N ATY EG SCHOOL VERY LOW OENsmr AL- MCNATVVE• -o . t �� F -XH15T 5 ■i - I I WINDROW < I WINDROW f WINDROW WINDROW WINDROW i VERY LOW PaRx 06951 Y SCHOOL WINDROW ' WINDROW CE str( I WINDCOW I WINDROW WINDROW WINOfcOW WINDROW 4— eun1:N�,T_ i �q //'[� /FLOW "I4� p(F►IHl i ro I � C on !■ to 1 CITY OF RARC110 CUCAHOIGA INITIAL STUDY PART I — nvir tal SHEET Fee: completed by applicant Eoonmen Assessment Review $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental rov Development this form must be completed and mubi„ieted to the Review Committee through the department where the project appllca':Ion is made Upon receipt Of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Devc.npment Reviwl Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to Se heard. The Committee will malts one of threr determinations: 11 The project will have no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: IS N -%MC, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAM -, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCC'iN 9G TIlIS PROJECT: �a rvr � Sonr "n Plan ^ +r ION or PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A,Ny) ASSESSOR NPARCEL LIST OTUCR PERIiITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDEGAi AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: MAI I -I G(o PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: • ACREAGE OF PROJECT ARF AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING MID PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IP ANY: �(�� DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONNE!IPAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCIA'DING INFORIiATION ON TOrOGRAPY.Y, PLAITS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTOPICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, T)SE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, 4ND TIIC DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the p:o)cct, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1I .n I- 2 (07 5 N _ f�? a in ground L 1, crcatu a substantial ehang contours? V 2. Create a substantial chan.10 in existing noiso or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire* water, q create changes in the existing zoning or reneral plan designations? Remove any existing trees! How many? 5. Create the need f,,r use or disposal of potentially "a:!, o flala materials such es? toxic substances, :v�ahles or - explos i. v c YES answers o a: e...,t anal LOn o_ any h o araa }✓n residential e unit Involves the the construction th3 Ipt? com !etc the Form next page. CgliTiFICAT IOH: I hereby crr tiff' that the statements furnisbet resent the data and for tbis initial ova in to and above and in the attached ex ibi ` n, statements. infor,,tton required best of ny atiltty, and that the A cC lnforr�tirn p- .cutcd are trfurthcreundcrstandtthitest of my V:nowledge and belief. I be submitted uato evau loom+ can be made by the acvrlrpr+c" a ddit ioc:+1 info rtution may 1+^ rrquLred o before a.lcq Acvi_w co Cn -ittec. 9 �� Signature patc -Q P w� Title t A e G1 Y OF RANCHO CUWIC)NGA 1fENORANDUH Date: December 5, '479 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Command; Developmnut Subject: GENERAL PLAT: AYEND!HE_ N0. 79-03D - CITY OF RANCHO CUCINONGA - A ceaogo from ten preaeut detigmclon of low density zos ld nntlal (2 -5 unite per gores acre) to medium density residential (5 -15 d by Red dwelling units per gross acre) for the property Drive nled San Ber- Mill Country Club Drive, Tapia Via. Rancheria nardino Road ABSTRACT: On November 14, 1979, the Flaming Commission npptoved General Plan Amenamont No 79 -03D recomending amendment of the land .se mzp for the above mentioned pruparty. Tconformance Plan h moreyreea reasonable projected outcome, the DISCUSSION: The proposed site, approximately 311 n,ree in size, has six new multiple family dwellings frorting on San Bc�ardiro Road: south of Chess units are two duplexes: scat of Tapia Via 1a a ¢otnl, coin car vase and three acant aparument nrmplexes. The remainder of this aivacantvf field east]ofethe motel and consist of the Magic Lamp, the parking :ot, car wash facility, aingle _ °amily conventional dve ',linge [o the south and west the across Rancheria Drive and Red Bill Country Slub Drive A church exists o t southwet 2 and 3 s for thercurrent m n en zoning and GaralrPlar. desigration.a refer to Exhibits The project area is presently 60 to 70% developed with uses that are more a.asis- tenc with tht madi m density residential designation than the existing low density residential designation. The remaining vacant arena are large ea"�gh to density nmodatn family vere to be ongdFoothilllldBlvd. nd the mingle family uses south o`. Rancherin Drive. RECOMMEN AT10N: T(ie Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve General la. Amendment No 79 -03D. Respeegfully submitted, JACK H;Ay, Director of Cu ®unity Development JL:as Attaclarnts: Exhibit 1, Land Use Map Exhibit 2, Toning Mop Exhibit 3 Proposed Geamrai Plan 61 I nr u O o 1 �• I li -- 3AWO I h� AlI1WOO Ill" o- 321 I �I I N _sl , 7O6 co J o L 0 t ' 0 X N F W • wrl -Y VIA N W N It O + .l n -v� � I % N N \ r:• r B(11:7 A211Nl109 1-11H 03y :--- - -- .• \\ '�,;' \•u r x Cl am 03 W r.. .N. •. � - ;- - �t ,a� •�� rte' � V (, :w VIA s ✓Id NI 4 VIA e•`` � tR ... I`•�u 4(nl Ate`.. •••� \ (HJ r 1, '• � On `^ Q 17 w o J _ N e ` w i o („� . -- • r 3.1180 Bnla A81Nn00 11H 038 Aa1Nn00 1104 038 i �� %i a CL i° X Lu J •• N D Sm @ rt ` - VIA s -- And -9 vin ' as a e! F I •ni: `I o m _ 3A18o B1110 Aa1Nl100 111H 039 : —•— -�+ ��� 1• r g r m Aalnnoa 111H 038 -i: _ C.) � N_ 'ltll :�J3NW0� a�Jln?J35 Ca cn cc co /nO L I {.L © , : VIA ..$• " VIdVJ -I VIA LLI �_ .l J IQ _...er__ i •Z q o;� y� ij to in go u7 � o ,• n R• , Ili) '° P %� • "a ""i a lII � CNj l+1 'N� 0 C1 • 1i •r 3AkI0 9nl.) A8lNl100 IIIH 031J :• - - - -- \ ��� ; A&IMI00 IIIH 038 -2- , T-1, 73 U • fl f ( i CITY OF RANCHO CUC,QSWCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $10.00 For all projects requiring environmental review. his form must be completed and submitted to the Review Ccranittee through the department where the project application is made Upon re:elpt of this application, tho Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the initial Study The Development Review Committe. will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days bef ?re the public meeting at which time the project is to be h -ard. The Committee will med:e one of three determinations: 11 The project will have no environmental impact and a 1: ^gative Declaration will be filed, 21 The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information ceixt -rning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: G P A APPLICANT'S NA:IE, ADDRESS NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING TtytIS PROJECT: �gr n S.aniet n _ -t— OF PROJECT (STIm rom SS Atfi ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.)• LIST OT11C11 PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATR AND FEDERAL. AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 71 r- r-- PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT All, Fl.r 1. 6> h r vn P/o ✓mow aa.re, ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: A1.4, DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONPE. "NTAL SETTTNG OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUD:NG INFOrMNTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PFOPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY _ Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a serice of cumulative actions, which although individually small, m b a wnole have significant environmental impact? -- I- 2 %S r r wlLf. TIM: PWMrCT: . Yrs in 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? • 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, lire, water, sewage, etc.)°. 4. create changes in the existing zoning or general plar designations? vf S. Remove any existing trees.? How many ?__ _ _✓ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of - potentia.ly hazardous materials such as toxic sl.bstances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YE.; answers above: < t,%+ Tc 'Fe nvR InfORT \'r: If the pro)ect involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. OERTIrICAT'ON: I hereby certify thnt the statements furnisher t.ove and in the attached exhibits present the date and inforviticn required for this initial ovaluatior to the best of r} 11•ilLty, and that th^ fact-., vtatcments, and info- r -cton pr ^sented are true ani correct tc the best of my knr+ ledge and belie'_. I further understand that addit.onal infornation may bn required to be submitted before in adequate evaulation can be made by the Davrinrnent Rev'cw COrarittt0. D.te ScP-F 4 1172 Signature _ Title Te. P�emw.r. T -3 HEM0RANDUH Date: November 29, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Cormmity Services Subject: City Recognition of previously recognized County, State or National Landmarks or Points of Historic Interest within Rancho Cucamonga The Ills' 'reservation Commission forwards to Council for their consideration eight .t .rich have been noted and recognized of historic value by other agencies so clarged The Commission feels that these would be the natural base frome which to build the City's historic Preservation program. The sites are: National Register of Historic Places 1.) Case de Rancho Cucamonga (Rains' House) California State Historic Landmarks 1.) CSIIL No 360 - Tapia Adobe Site 2.) CSUL No. 490 - Cucamonga Rancho Winery San Bernardino Caunty Point of Historical Interest 1) 2) ? 3.) 4.) S.) Garcia Ranch house (Chaffey Ilouse) Uncle Billy's Tavern (Sycamore Inn) Cucamonga Chinatown Site Cousins House (Christman House) Milliken Ranch Staff Comment: Attached find the application for designation on each of the above 1 st s tes (There is much backup eocmmentatim available on each of these sites, in fact, Bore than is reasonable to duplicate If you wish to examine the documentation or wish a copy made, let me know and it will be furnished) Staff Analysis: The City recognition of these Landmarks or Points of Interest will make no chznges to each of the sites or uses. There will be no financial impact created by these recognitions [omission Recommendation: That City recognition of these three landmarks and five Points of Historic Interest be granted by Council 77 ■ e OFDINANTJE No. 92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMO.NGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING TIM CASA OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 4tS-TM1A-AB06E-&M. AND THE CUCAMONGA RANcHo WINERY AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE n CITY AND THEREFORE U&AILN' AXES EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: Section 1: The City Council finds and determines that the follow!n¢ ieatura s o -the City have met the criteria established by Ordinance No. 70 for Historic preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these features as Historic Landmarks of the City of Rancho Cucamonga I Casa do Rancho Cucamonga a abe `S. Cucamonga Rancho Winery Section 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (IS) days after its passage, at least once • in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth Day of December, 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: 1- City Cler — 0 Mayor ORDINANCE No. 93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE GARCIA RANCH HOUSE, Vnete-STMT+S-ME" THE CUCAMONGA CHINATOWN SITE, THE COUSINS HOUSE, AND THE MILLIKEN RANCH AS (� \ SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINTS COF IREST PTY POINT OFTTh Y/i/u' A.0 MMREFORE- DEgtEwxES . J HISTORIC INTEREOT. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: Section 1: The City Council finds and determines that the 071lowing features of the City have met the criteria established by Ordinance No 70 -8 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these features as Historic Points of Interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga A a. Garcia Ranch House b. uncle eB li 11�c�+v.�y� -4 \ � VL C. 7�'ho Cuc •1omaoegn China�(o�wn Site d The Cousins House P- e. Milliken Ranch Section 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City o Ontar o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cueamonga, California. p.1SScD, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th Day o_ December, 1979 AYES: NOES: ABSENI�� ATTEST: City Clark 71? Mayor S'`4piiceIon for HISTORIC LANDXARK Desionation . iDEBTIFICATIOV 1. Cormmn name. Rains' House 2 Historic name, if known:_ Ceaa do Rancho Cucamonga 3. Street or rural address: 7869 Vineyard Ave. City: Rancho Cucamonga zip. 94730 _ County:_5.8. Assessor's parcel no Legal description: Zone: 4. Present owner, if known: San Bornardino County Address:c /o 5. B. County Mus- eum, 20 range zon ens • City: Redlands Zip: 92373 Ownership is: public X private 5. Present Use: Mustum /Home Original Use: Home Other past uses: Between 1676'and 1919 house was occupied by carious renters. During VM I front rooms of house were used for storage of hay and straw. DESCRIPTION 6 Briefly describe the present ph4sical appearance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations Tram its original condition: Preaant physical condition "Very Good ". House has undergone ex- tanp.:ve restoration over pest 7 years by Casa do Rancho Cucamonga Historical Society. Restoration of house in continuing, landscap- ing of grounds now underway. Future major restoration plans include restoring overhang and columns on south, west, and oast of house and same in the patio. 7. Locational sketch map (draw and tabei site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): S. Approximate property size: Lot size (in feet) Frontage Depth or approx acreage 1$ arras 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent_ h. Good X e. Fair d. Deteriorated_ e. No longer in existance_ 10, is the feature a. Altered? x b. Unaltered? 11, surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land_ b Residertial_ C. Scattered buildings_ d Densely build -up_ e. Commercial_ f. Industrial X OD g Other Large perking lot on wee pros oTproporty 1. -4• that were made 12. Threats to site: a. Clone known_ b. Private development X c Zoning d. Public clerks Protect_ e. Vandalism_ f Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) Extsneiv o e of photographs ane in- - TffrargTSC7 is uneum/ o'Fi —mn NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for strictures only. 14 Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick (Fired) X C. Stuccos_ d. Adobe e. Hood_ f, Other 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? X b. Moved? c Unknown? 16 year of initial construction 1860 This date is: a. Factual X b Estimated 17. Architect (if known): John Rains 7 • 18. Budder (if known): Joseph Mullally, brick manufaeturar, Of Loa Angeles Winery.& Bathhouse & 19. Related features: a. Barn b. Carriage hojso(akMOSA)Outhouse (foundation d. Shed(s)_ e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill g Hatertower /tankhouse h. Other. 1. None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and /cr architectural inportance (include date;, events, and persons associated with the site when known): House belonging to original 13,000 Acza Rancho Cucamonga, built in 1860 by John Raino for his wife, Dona liercod do Williams Ra' Fix at fired -brick house in San Bernardino County, oecond oldest firs brick house still in existence in So. California. Placed an Nat ohs Register of His- toric Places in 1973. Combination Spanish -style and Southern Planta- tion in architecture. 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture X b. Arts d Leisure_ c. Economic /Industrial_ d Goverwent e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military__ g Religion h. Social /Education (First school in West -and of San Bernardino County held in SW room of house in 1870 (became Cucamonga School District). 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates. "Rancho Cucamonga and Dona Merced" by Esther Bo.ilton Black Case de Rancho Cucamonga Historical Society - files, scrap bq9 ihr 9, Society priv45 ory, R ^N=AM 0.uc.44Y0V0w4 8Y J'✓DLC giG�3 23. Date form prepared iT� By ,name); Maxine Strone M,jVAWJ Adoeess. 7403 A,.chabald i•.c. City. Rancho Cucamonga Zip. 91730 Phone: 9ST -2835 Organization CSty of Rancho Cucamonga n Casa de Rancnc Cucamonga Historical Sac. t°rasident) l City use Only .y I I eerier +n,rc.- .o•�utwwnga -• ' - - .� 4'Appiication for HISTORIC LANDMARK Oesfana•ion 0IDENTIFI CAT 10-1 1. Co=*n name: TAPIA ANODE SITE 2 Historic name, If knoam: Same as above 3. Street or rural address: Top of Red Hill (south and) City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 Cour.ty. S. B. Assessor's parcel no. one: Legal description: 4. Present owner, if known: Address: city. / Zip: Ownership is: public • private_._ S. Present Use:Sita is now tract of Original Use: Rancho Home privately owned condiminiums , 11. - Other past uses: Site formally used as plant nursery, until 1976 DESCRIPTION 6 Briefly describe the present h sical garanc! of the site or structure and describe any major alterations ram is a or yfna : ondition: No sign of the Adobe remains today. 7 Locatlonal sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, road:, and prominent landmarks): ' H,VA i ) 4 , -1 �`: r $rYL• of 5 ,! SSIC N a 8. Approximate property e: Lot size (1n f Frontage Depth or pprox. acreage 9. Condition: (check one) a Excellent_ h. Good_ C. Fair— d. Deteriorated_ a Nu longer in existance X 10. Is the feature a Alter4df b Unaltered? j 11, Surraundings: (check more than one if necessary a Open land_ b Residential_ c Scattered buildings d. De.,6ly build -up X e.. Comrercial_ f• Industrial_ /j Other 92 12. Threats to site: a. None known_ b. Private development_% c. Zoning d Public Works Project_ a Vandalism f Other 13 Oates of enclosed photographs) No pnotographo exist NOTE: The :allowing (Items 14 -19) are for ctructures only. 14.. Primary exterior bailding material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_ c. Stucco d. Adobe X e. Wood_ f. Other 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site?_ b. Moved? c. Unknown? longer exists ` C\ 16. Year of initial constructic/ 1939 This date is: a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Architect (if known). 18. Builder (if known): Tuborcin Tapia (Indian labor 7) 19. Related features: a Barn_ b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill 9. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other i. None SIGNI°ICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates, events, and persons associated with theq site yhen known• Tubareie Tapia, e Mama of 7rentes 0 13,000 sere x lean land grant in 1839. Known as Rancho Cucamonga. Legend assiciated with Tapia concerning a buried treasure in 1845. A crumbing adobe wall was all that remained in 1920's. `• 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture b. Arts L Leisure_ C. Economic /Industrial d. Government r e. Exploration /Settlement X f. Military g• Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, Qocume -s kurveys, personal interviews ana their dates. California Histr-.c Leadmhr s pp "Rancho Cucamonga" by Judge Archie 0. Mitchell (anclosadl, 1957 4; "Rancho Cu anion@a a``��d Dte1oKaa Merced" by Esther Boulton Black, 1975 i 23 0.1c pr p�eP��ipd'ai'8Js79108;� `name �: he fiaxino Strane Address:7a03 Archibald Avo._ City: Rancho Cucamongo Zip: 91730 Phone:-287-2e35 Organization: City of Ranchn Cucamonga r ' Historic Preservation Commission City Use Only ■ 'HISTORIC LANDMARK Oesionation �IDEUTIFI CAT 107 I Canon 2 Historic name, if known: d_L1"Mnj eA 3. Street or rural address: 8916 Fco7W /4L. BLVD City: 1P.aWdH0 CeIC6N04164 Zip: J /730 County: Sau Beem no 203 /o/ /o Assessor's parcel no. .9p.9 /o/ // Zone. Commerc,A" r SLID a cQCA VIUCY.wrd TA+ N 660 hr PTN LOT /1 Ex rkre P %w tyiN6 A A c/ PRnnu '/ra/ /r! ,u.h and /so FT Legal description: u of u u lav r RLS•a /cn Fr w.be &.c/ Re. NIL_ 4 Present owner, if k:,^.;,n: F. /op, FAH/ /y (*See belo,o) Address: PO. Bo7C 2- City: K PA L.oaiA Zip: 91752 Ownership is: public private S. Present Use: W14FZV Original Use: W1NEPY Other past uses: 6ROUJIR1G and Sforiny of Agrieu Iburai Prcduc't c * crops K OWNERS TOrepi y F/hgpw .7 L /NON H/N65 OESCRIhTION 41? Y /RG/N /N 1V-V1! .Z4 '!r 1cv/SF 411X 6. 7. Briefly describe the present h slcal a 2arance of the site or structure and describe any major alterations rom is or g aT condition: _ original Ababa wtuerj bu,ldiny, Surauuded by Seucra( SiorclSa 6u//dinJes/ R disc. /wary bor/Jr:,y, s1 L�7rye outdoor wnuB L�dNk. tJiax`•/lot been d4vVerted' 117-fo a ylf't 'yep. e olzvee Arca, Rgtc uDsnee y 1-ce" ;9A/c 9 ty �e tj Law,vs. gr"Fl!,Utn s c4nd/ ,eaxUdsc/+y/n9, 72/EAjl7/n &,Ii.Uery hUytn5 /,W &en re2f&1/t LV /emse eav/ce Locational sketch map (draw and label 8. Approximate property size: site and surrounding streets, roads, Lot size (in feet) , and prominent landmarks): Frontage 04C Depth 1410 or approx acreage_? ANres LD 0 Q L1AIry 1J1ne &y �\T 4vmev Vmejard tI red Civimmy Prcf..'fY) up iMPrev,el j:LyO 9. Condition (check one) a. Excellent_ h. Good 1! e Fair d Deteriorated, e. No longer in existance_ 10 Is the feature a. Altered? /! b Unaltered? 11, Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a Open land ✓ b. Residential_ c. Scattered buildings_ d. Densely build -up_ e. Com ercial 1! f. Industrial_ g. Other 12. Threats to site: a. None known ✓ b. Private development_ C. Zoning d oublic Uorks Project_ e. Vandalism_ f. Other 13. Date of enclosed photograph(s) 197/ 11OTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_ c stucco ✓ d. Adobe_ e. Hood_ f. Other 15 Is the structure: a. On its original site ? —/ b. Moved? c. Unknown? 16. Year of initial construction 1939 This date is: a. Factual t/ b Estimated 17. Architect (if known): /ltG',uriWAI 18. Builder (if known):Trrin TOk9 r7,K/Cl/jnfYG .L- yi%rtYt 19. Related features: a. Barn b. Carriage house r/ C. Outhouse_ d. Shed(s)_p,' e. Formal garden(s)L f. Windmill g Hatertower /tankhouse h. Other fer I. None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (includ- dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): eB /r14"M.BS CLLL`ST (!J /R 6Py, Esx'aQ /,r%d 6y TiXuiaeo Tapia to cadcm ae G'vca�+cvya .PsneJ(a was ranted ,yore% d /939 6y Governor tau �dszo' ,9.tverado of McVeo "7wpta t. rmedetelj 6w 1E en a/cde /4ene p4nfel yneyardr and S'zirrfad &Ylt%rnays a -Ir wrivey power Boas = �rnaf<d fo 'ge lu.nerryy by taster vfroa•r dvcq ovyn crre1C, &&4416 rerateda w3fev evbeelt q ;;7tetf of -4/,,vr w1rel Ca,,H Sure onytne/ pares) can .4e ScrN -ecdoy 21 Main there of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture_ b. Arts b Leisure_ c. Economic/ Industrial t/ d. Goverrunent e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military 9. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal intevi and their dates. b'<et ,ednelie e✓catyv Nye and Dr.0 ,'felced , /w e. vWcr. 'CE « . G /a<s Ju <6 .F ty /a6e/ lyfe Fedet. l U %r, &.s PtgiecY 94W AWive.Sc• s 23 Date form prepared,. -2 -7y By (name)•fi/, / /e,H Altx Address:S7.9/%Ptfs /' �g city Pk' -r'q io Zip: 9174.7, Phone: &ie-Gl/ i Organization: &e 8rrs of NoH s lue ytciS City use Only 4 � •; r� - X11 `HIST0R!C I M03ARK Oesianation 8IOEriTIF1CATIO3 1 Co=.3n name: r/w1tey- Saac1a Bouae 2 Historic name, if known: fawur PanCA llaaae 3. Street or rural address: 6295' fti&anda Ave.; W YW Lot 6, Blori. "f" fcuwnda oLv:,, Landai pA&ate dfnt aaad oAigii a14 b oom as &wm Ave. City. %t:=nda. ra.Lt� Zip: 91739 County. San Beneaadlno Assessor's parcel no Legal description. Zone: 4. Present owner, if known:Lewia Naas, 9nc. Address: City: Zip: Ownership is: public • private x S. Preset t Us,-: Reai-d_nce Original Use: eeaidenaa Other past uses: DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present pi.i�icdl as eapng2 of the site or structure and describe any major alterations nom wtf ' s ar�inal condition: Painted, aaaaAuand /wane udth tuo A ed- Soule Aw,, ce, acing a roemoa c&,nnay, 6et=e the dinLV w m and &z Asont pmaioa. 94 is &o- atoay, with a e n&u:L AmV, with a ataiw ay, goap Atom the Atont a� th Aouae to a covered pwcA on the noA4 oA barb, of the ioaae. 7/r_se iA aLao a Ai place 6e&ean t/e Leo Atom 6edwama. R Am4 a atone- aa-Ued eeL&s 7" ate /ceduood /.Leona La t/ee dining woon a,,d Anont pa^Lo' 7. Locational sketch map (drawn and label 8. Approximate property size: 2�ae plot site and surrounding street roads, and prominent landmarks): hee a#tarhedf Lot size (in feet) r P 17 3 20 K 27 x 20 15 x2 t D 20 x 40 R 20x2 ?R 2a x2 W. r1 Frontage Depth or approx acreage 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent h. Good_ c. Fair_ d. Deteriorated x e. No longer in existence_ 10 Is the feature a. Altered?_ b Unaltered? 11, Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land x b. Residential_ c. Scattered buildings_ d. Densely build -up__ e. Commercial_ f. Industrial__ g Other n 12. Threats to site: a hone known_ b. Private development x c. Zoning d. Public 11orks Project_ e. vandalism_ f. Other 13. Oates of enclosed photographs) 11w & 1978 NOTE: The following (Items 14 -?9) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_ c. Stucco_ d. Adore e. Wood x f. Other 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? x b. Moved? c. Unknown? 16. Year of initial construction 1874 This date is: a. Factual b. Estimated xx 17. Architect (if known): WdaLoan 18. Builder (if Ynown): aoaepA §anc:a 19. Related features: a. Barn b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse_ d. Shed(s)_ e. Form] garden(s) f Windmill g. Watertower /tankhouse h. Other x I. None _ Stone ci.atenn nadA o� the Aoude. SIGNIFICANCE , 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates, events, and persons c'sociated with the site when known): P.egintened as a Point o� 11iatoAZca.L 9ntent4tp San Be&nzA&no Cv2nty, /lo. SBa -0.82, 12/22/75• 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture_ b. Arts d Leisure_ c. E-onomic /Industrial_ d. Government _ e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military g. Religion h. Social /Education ' 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, persona. interviews, and their dates See attarled neuapapen anticLce, dotue,enfa, and ne/ated data. 23 Date form prepared 11 1 ?/7o By (name): B,yeA4 2. yi•'t • a td Po6 ..f NE hcox Address: city: Fti „anda. L Zip. 917?9 Phone: Organization:_Pan --Ao ra naa NiAtoAi=L foe !4&!oa city use only f:ppllcation for HISTORIC LAUXARK Oesinnation SIDENTIFICATIGO 1. Conmmn nacre. SYCAMORE INN Uncle Billy (Wm) Rubottom trailside irm site. 2 Historic name, if known:Stagecoach stop, Butterfield Stage Lines operating between San Bernardino and Los Angeles.(Bear Gulch) 3 Street or rural address: ° +• 8318 FOOTHILL BLVD. San City: RANCHO CUCAMONGA Zip: 91730 County: Bernardino Assessor's parcel no. 207- 101 -24 Zone:_ - - - - -- See attached(Por. Cucamonga Fruit Lands Legal description:_ M.H. 4/9 ) N.ap. 4. Present owner, if known:SYCARORE INN INC. Address: 8318 Foothill BLVD. city. Rancho Cucamonga Zip:91730 Ownership is: public Present Use: Dining House Originsl Use: Country Inn. Hotel part of the Inn , located on the second floor, Other past uses: used from 1912 -.939. Eliminated by Irl Hinricheen DESCRIPTION • 6. 7. Briefly describe the present ph siccai ao rage of of the site or structure and describe any major alteration, trom t' i s original condition: This building in supposedly the fourth building on this site. Built in 1912 by John Blussan. Taken over by Irl Hinricheen in 1939 and remodeled. Tle sits was cleared of stones me potograph of the period shows. Well preserved and maintained He major alterations . Locational sketch map (draw and label S. Approximate property size: - site and surrounding streets, roads. Lot size (in feet) Approx. and prominent landmarks): Frontage 300 ft. Depth. 'p+r` See attached Map. ( Por. Cucamonga or approz, acreage 2 Fruit Lands M.B. 4/9) See attached aerial photgraph. t 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent-U b. Good_ c. Fair d. Deteriorated_ e. No longer in existence_ 10. ,Is the feature a. Altered?_ b. Unaltered? X - 11, Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land_ b Residential- c. Scattered buildings ?OC d. Densely build -up_ e. Commercial xX f. Industrial_ g. Other 12. Threats to site: a. flone known xx b. Private development_ c. Zoning d Public 11orks Project, e. Vandalism f. Other 13. Oates of enclosed photographs) 1912( ?) 1979 NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only. 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone = b. Brick_ c. Stucco d. Adobe e. Woody f. Other iS. I- the structure: a. On its original site? xx b. Moved? c. Unl-nown? 16. Year of initial construction 1912( ?)This date is: a. Factual b. Estimated xz 17. ;.rchitech (if known): " "� -_ • 18. Builder (if known): John Klusman 19. Related features: a. Barn -,_ b. Carriage house c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) xx e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill g. Watertover /tankhouse h. Othe%cam re i. None - .. grave SIGIIIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates, vet a d rs s asso isttCCd with the site when knptm ): e0r�slnaf b�ii18£ng a ra oids inn- operated by IIncle Billy Rubottom (1848 ?) until?. Historical importance for the area. See references. Present 'building by John Klusman 1912. Taken over by Irl Hinricheen 1939. Now operated as Dining House by Sycamore Inn. Inc. Deeigmted " Point of Historical Interest" by S.B. County S.Br -070 12/22/75• Sign on site reads "Famous hospitality since 1848." - -21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture x • b. Arts E Leisure c. Economic /Industrial_ d. Government e. Exploration /Settlement xx f. Military , `g. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates. LightoOveerathee Cucamonga eClucPareahn`]1c974)1 Bear Gulch (atotachad tout 0 the West. giLeonard 9 /79isRa ond.Thompson-Attached u 23. PlfaPenporm f Pet aFe'hnobpj 3'jce Raymond Address: 7426 Onyx Ave Li ty: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91?;O Phone: 987 -3234 Organization: City Ranco Cucamonga Hiatorio Presetration Commission City Use Only ;'Application for HISTORIC LANDMARK Desirnatfon I / IOENTIFICATI0:1 1 Common name:. CUCANONGA CHINATOWN SITE 2 Historic name, if knarm: ( NAVARRETTE RESIDENCE) Chinatown Site 3 Street or rural address: 9591 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD 4k RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730 San Cf ty: Zip: County: Bernardino Assessor's parcel no. Zone Legal description: 4. Present owner, if known:DOLORES NAVARRETTE Address: 9591 San Bernard - (Purchased in 1 /7 ) ino Road. City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 _ Own =rship is: Privatef' Residennce Chinatown Country 6- Present Use: � Original UseSt�,�1 ( Store Counters on property) Other past uses: Duplex apartments- Chinese Tenants. DESCRIPTION r 6. Briefly describe the present h sical appearance of the site or structure and describe any ma or alterations ro� is or V nal coSditjio - Two story building with exter or cons ructed o tTle blocks, originally a duplex. Last remaining building of the Chinatown built about 1920 Used as a Store. Purchased by Navarrette family 1947. Covered patio added. Plumbing installed. Tunnels under house leading toward Klusman Ave , presumed to be gambling dens, were filled in partially. Walls separating duplex were removed and house now used as a single family residence. Concrete and [.tone steps,and walk,added in front. 7. Locational sketch map (draw and label ' 8. Approximate property size: • site and surrounding streets, roads, 1 Lot size (in feet) and prominent landmarks): - Frontage 14011• T Depths 1�F or approx. acreage 11/2 acres , I 1 re N 9. Condition: (check one.) _ [Statioh a. Excellent h. Good X, San Bernardino Road c. Fair d Oeterioratea__ e No longer in existance_ CCHD lrl 10. Is the feature a�: . Altered? XX QCucamonga + b. Unaltered? _— pas Office 11, Surroundings: (check more than one Z if necessary) Navarrette q Residence E a. Open land x b. Residential_ Chinatown Site dl Eotueia Ct. c. Scattered buildings xx d. Densely build -up J, e. Commercial f. Industrial Other P�remSSaticosan�lff�- '' 9 G.G. a aw-� r Dot. Office FOOTHILL BLVD _ _ 12. Threats to site: a. clone known xx b. Prf••dte development_ c Zoning c d. Public Works Project_ e. Vandalism f. Other 13. Dates of enclosed photograph(s) August 1979 NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b. Brick_ c. Stucco_ d. Adobe e. Wood f. Other Block Tile uR!W colored 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? xx b. Moved? c. Unknown? 16. Year of initial construction ca 1920 This date is: a. Factual b Estimated xx 1' Architect (if known): --- • Araiza Family. Building were built as rental sites 18 Builder (if known): for Chinese tenants: 19. Related features: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house c. Outhouse_ d. Shed(s) 71 e. Formal gardens) f. Windmill g. Watertower /tankhrdse h. Other Added Patio i. None - SIGNIFICANCE ` 'O •• "�� "" 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural inportance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): Originally the Cucamonga area contained twelve wooden buildings which were the local Chinatown located on thesouth aide of San Bernardino Rd.•between Now IQusman Ave and Hellman. Nine were destroyed in a Fire Juno 16,1919• Araiza built a group of Block tile duplexes to replace the ones lost. Navarrette residence is the last remaining building of the era,Chinatown. ended in 1939. ++ " POINT OF HISTORICAL INTEREST' S.Br. -077, 11/22•(7$ De6gnated. 21 Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture_ ^ b. Arts d Leisure c. Economic /Industrial_ d. Government e. Exploration /Settlement xx f. Military_ g, Religion h. Social /Education 22 Sources: List books, documents. surveys, personal interviews, and their dates. - Personal interview with Mrs. Dolores Navarrette, owner, resident of Cucamonga since childhood, on 9/21/79 Light over the Mountain, D.L. Clucas , Copyright (1970) 23. Date form prepared 22 By (name): Leonardo G rczyca _ Address: 7426 Onyx Ave city: Rancho Cucamonga Zip:_ 91730 Phone: 987 -3234 Organization: Ch. Raon+ Nist�000 eserva ancho Cuen ri an Commis of n. City use Only �r plicaticn for NISTORIC LANDMARK Deslnnation $IDEIITIFI CAT IO:i 1. Comion name: CHRISTMAS HOUSE 2 Historic name, if known: H.D.COUSTNS HOUSE 1904 wh2TSON HOUSE 1910 3. Street or rural address: 9240 ARCHIBALD AVE City: RANCHO CUMIONCA, CA. San Zip 91730 County: Bernardino -r-Alf T24TS Assessor's parcel no. 010.15Q-0584! Zone: 1 5013 AaoA Legal description: 4. Present owner, if known: John Morrison (1978) Address: 9240 Archibald City: Rancho Cuoamonga,CA. Zip: 91730 Ownership is: public *s • private- 5- Present Use: Residence- -•• Original Use: Residence Other past uses: Residence •� Upon completion of root specified date(s) for p DESCRIPTION n property will be open upon visitation. 6 B•iafly deslribe the present h sical a garance of the site or structure and d vibe any major alterations rom Its or ginal condition: - Present rhyaical condition "Pair ". The house is undergoing extensive restoration by the present owner. Plans are being made for landscaping thegrounds. Owner is living in the carriage house during the restoration period, does not plan any major alterations. 7. Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and priminent landmarks): 7 th St. DearBrook St. )m� 6 th St. 0 B th St. 2 ~ Deerbrook St. S ti Q: Y 6th St ll -m, .n , 8. Approximate property size: Lot size (in feet) 0 ft- Depth Frontage 3 Depth or approx. acreage One (1) acre, 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent_ h. Good_ c. Fair x d Deteriorated_ e. No lo.:ger in existence_ •10. Is the feature a Altered? Rewtored b. Unaltered? i1, Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land_ b Residential x c. Scattered buildings d. Densely build -up e. Commercial Z f. Industrial_ g. Other �a 12. Threats to site: a, clone known 7 b. Private development_ c Zoning d, Public Uorks ProJcct_ e. Vandalism— f, Other 13 Dates of enclosed photograph(s) 11/12/78 Daily Report ,August 1979 NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only 14. Primary exterior building material: a Stone X b. Brick_ c. Stucco d. Adobe a Wood X f. Other 15. Is the structure: a. On its original site? X b. Moved? c Unknown? -- 16. Year of initial construction 1904 This date is: a. Factual X b. Estimated 17. Architect (if known): • 18. Builder (if known): H.D.CODSINS 19. Related features: a. Barn b. Carriage house X c. Outhouse_ d. Shed(s) e. Formal garden(s). f. Windmill g. Wacertower /tankhouse h. Other i. None SIGNIFICANCE r..i • - 20. Briefly state historical and /or arailtecturat inportance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): IV Designated "Point of Historical Interest" by San Bernardino County. SBr -073, 12/22/75 Built by H.D. Cousins 1904, acquired by John Whitson 1910, donated by Thomas 0. McCutchan to S.B. County Museum Assoc. 1977, after purchase from Mrs. Whitson. Sold by the Museum Assoc. to John and Cecilia Morrison 8/28/1978. 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture X b. Arts & Leisure c. Econ=4 /Industrial_ d. Government • e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military 9. Religion h. Social /Education , ,. 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates Light Over the &fountain, D,L.Clucas (1974) San Bernu•dino County Museum Assoc. Newsletters Vol XII, No.3, March 1977 and Vol. 13 Nos. 8 & 9 August& September 1978. Daily Report 11/12/78 -- -- 23. Date fu-n prepared 9 /a/79 By (name):_ Leonard R. rerozyya Address: 7426 CnvX Ave City: Rancho Cucamonga -Zip:_ 91730= Phone: 714 -987 -3234 Organization: Rancho Cueamonga Historic u on omm sa on. City use Only i V "- (STORK LAND13ARK Oesf.matfon 18(OEUTIFI CAT 10:1 1 Comma name:_ G1 Milliken Ranch (Hausa site) 2 Historic name, if known: Soma as abovu 3 Street or rural address: Corner of Arrow Highway and Haven Ave. City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 County: 5. B. Assessor's parcel Legal description 4. Present owner, if known: Milliken Family Address: c/o 900 E. Harrison City:_ Pomona Zip: 91767 Ownership 15: public privat-e-7— S. Present Usc: La Manche Golf Course Original Use: Wine -grans vineyards Other past uses: Pro -golf shop was originally a raisin shop DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present h sicat a earance of the site or structure and describe any rujor alterations from is or g na condition: Milliken Ranch House, built in 1891, was completely destroyed by fire on November S. 197: , 7. Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets roads, -and prominent landmarks): a , B. Approximate property size: Lot sage ('n feet) Frontage Depth or approx. a �eage. 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent_- b. Good_ e. Fair d. 3eteriorated e "aoslo�noer in existarce X 10. Is the feature a. Altered? X b. Unaltered? 11, Surroundings: (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land_ b. Residential_ c. Scattered buildings X d. Densely build -up e. Cow4rcial X f. Industrial 7�qy 12. Threats to site: a. None known % b. Private devcloprent_ c. Zoning d Public liorks Project_ e. Vandalised f Other 13 Dates of enclosed photographs) NOTE: The following (Items 14 -19) are for structures only 14. Primary exterior building material: a. Stone_ b Brick_ C. Stucco d. Adobe e. Wood X f. Other 15. Is the s!—cture: a. On its origit.al site? X b Moved? c. Unknown? 16.• Year of initial construction 1891 This date is: a. Factual X b Estimated 17. Architect (if known) - 11 18. Builder (if known): e 19. Related features: a. Barn X b. Carriage house c. Outhouse d. Shed(s) x e. Formal garden(s) f. Windmill g. WatertLaer /tankhouse h. Other I. None SIGNIFICANCE 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural importance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): Milliken Ranch was first "dry" ranch (wine -grape vineyards with- , nut irrigation) in Cucamonga. Chinese laborers worked the vineyards. Two -story house featured tongue- and - groove redwood paneling, living room had stage at ono and „nd noted large picture window with view of Cucamonga Peak at other and, Mass Ruth Milliken, who died in j October, 1979, was owner /manager of rancho from 1919 to 1950. One of few women to ever hold such pA position in California. 21. Main theme of the historic resource: `checl. only one): a. Architecture__, ` b. Arts b Leisure_ c. Yr= =x;AtIodusxxtal X d. Government e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military_ 9. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, personal interviews, and their dates. Personal interview, "Light Over Mountain" by Dan Clucas, "Rancho Cucamonga and Dona Merced" by Esther Boulton Black 23. Date form prepared 1!_79 By (name): Ado Cooper (typed by Maxine Strome) Address: 8520 Red Mill Co.CilulL(ty: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 9171n Phone: 9827274 D- rPganization:_ City of Rancho Cueampn��, Historic Preservation Commission City use Only RESOLUTION ND. 79 -102 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ADOPTED INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCA- r, (� HONDA GENERAL PLAN 11V�, WHEREAS, the City has eotaolished the second meting in Sap tuber e the 1979 Cencrsl Plan Aamndvrnt hearing date Zor Planning Co sion view; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public bearing Lab consider amendments to the General Plan; and uICEREAS, commute vere heard and considered both pro and con regarding the requested General Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended for consideration by the Council four General Plan Anndments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing an December 5, 1979 to consider cozeents pin and con regarding the General Plan Amendments recom- mended by the Planning Camissb.o. e NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby mend the General Plan land Use Element an follows: V1 SECTION 1: For General Plan Amendment No 79 -03D, amend the Land Use Map to lands bounded by Red Hill Country Club Drive, Tapia Via, Rancheria Drive, and San Bernardino Road including lands 160' east of Tapia Via and south 300' form San Bernardino from Low Deosity Residential to Medium Density Residen- tial (Exhibit "A "). SECTION 2: For General Plan Amendment Ito. 79 -03E, amend the Land Use Map for the nartbwst corner of Base Line Avenue and Haven Avenue from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential (Exhibit "B "). SECTION 3: For General Plan Amendment No 75 -03F, amending and clarifying the definition of Altumative Commercial Site as show on Exhibit "C' through "H" and adding the follvving policy changes to the General Plan Text: 1. Alternative Com.rclal Asterisks show on the Cenral Plan are only general location and ecou that there is a 7otentlal for the location of shopping centers in that immediate area. Depending upon the size of the property and the market area served, the commercial center may be either neighborhood or corm ity. 2. No more than two commercial centers are to be located at any one intereection. 9G 3 For neighborhood centers, sites should fall within the approximta size range of 3 to g acres and for a community shopping conter,eites Should fall within the approximate range of 10 to 0 acres. 4 Commercial centers should he '- ocated at least 1/2 mile apart except for the too allowed at intersections. SECTION 4: For General Plan Amendment No. 79 -03I9 exend the Land Use Map for the property beginning at a point 600' vest of Baven on the north side of Base Line and extending approximtely 670' along Base Line and extending north to the Pacific Electric Railroad right-of-way from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential (Exhibit "I'). SECTION 5: Reenem:eod adoption of the Negative Declaration for each of the General Plan Ameudmuts, 79 -03D, 79 -03E, 79 -03P, and 79 -03I. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of AYES: NOES: ABSENT: City Clerk Mayor Is I ' t v J + i � N } ^s r ;i• ti J Ai "1%lt7SlaMwo2 aay.�3s a 3 m m i P 2 0 E ® CL i c c a� Crl a j _.. ��� ♦ 6� d- 9AMU 9rrn d&M1,02 -MH 67d I ! �l ° ^'EEC!' `J \ l� 'N , Ali. ,1 7 GENERAL PLAT of Illis S►1S1 IyI�N n'(I P sirr 1I . Loy QEN9ri Y KP6lp7 ALl)=1tNAT,vF SITE FoR RE610MAL CEN�R F-1H16'— I -_ Tu CJ GENERAL PLAN Exlitblt c tombinea the nater0k% on the wrthvc *t, •onehvc ^rt and south - caat cernera of rrothlll Blvd and Vineyard into mie asterisk overlaying the lnteraoetlnn or roothtlt tttvd AM Vineyard Avenue. LOW DENSM J SEltvlGE Z HII}II fc � . �MMER�t �LNS17i eennat o LOW DEMMl`( -,6KYV E t:ctiRZW-tAL EXHI0IT C 0 0 0 V GENERAL PLAN Exhlblt D rllalnatr, tiw nelrri +k on the fouthenst corner oI Arrow ronte and Archibald and replaces the asterisk with neighborhood coaounity land usc. Ot 5�t /Door ZOr7o' Low LOV DENCITY II DENSITY I DELISIT( MWSMUM It1rA,LT IND" -rKY NHGHB M40rD CommOrT f 101 N1GN MMSITY 1.4w IDW VCASITY Qu4sl •wsUG D use EKMEtT D i GENERAL , ExiLLhit E etlminatrs the asterlvk ahavn near the intere +ctlen of PLAN Arrm+ Route and ilmon Avenue and ,Id- an asterisk ovor the Inter - uertlon of Iurner and Arrov Routs. Also. the asterisk at the north- east corner of Foothtll and Haven Is moved to the lntersectton of Foothill Blvd and Haven Avemv O' Sit !scot %wo' J� fi Mu2b VSE sERVwE CCMMU -OA. r Q AL Ot "iNE Mltea VSO r MINIAIVM IAirX. r INDUSTRY 7/ftll NeowM LOW OENSIIVFr 3 SIrY O E? INDUSTRY a DE 151H `INA�E � F \�# LOW pENSl -y I ?At Y- I I eiJ INOVSTxy 16 a F.rMIDIT t GENERAL PLAN 6rihibit P Combines the asterisks north of Highland Avenue on the east and vast side of Haven Avenue into ono asterisk on Haven between LmaOn Avenue and Highland Avenue. Alao the southwest tornar Of Lemon Avenue and Haven Avenue is designated Neighborhood Cooru- nity �% D� 50d /0001 woo O laWnl OFNSrry — � LOW DaNsiTY N�C�HeLlztlao ccmHVNITr r MiXFV V5e log Y r LOW i ALTEjZNATIVE DON NTY EXHIBIT- p i 1 - GENERAL PLAN Exhibit G cmbfnes tlw avr.•rlsk nn the wnuthvest n. rner of Ruchester D—enm and PAIrllnr Avtvno and IN' nr.rtl.vret corner of R.arllne Into one asterisk ever the Internerttnn of Rasellne Avenue and Rochester Avenlle L 0 tow VWsITY — _.,_sit• LOW J vemsiTY 41 fG 5CHOOL c 2 ALTElewATNE 101 7' 8 0 _3 VORY LOW 06NS1 rr EMOrr Q m' Exhil'l. " crahlnr+ Ihr l'tcrl5Lq on •hr fmtr corner, of Ftivarda GENERAL Ave".r ani gascllnn Avenue Into one neterixk over the intersection of Mscl Inv and FL lumsla A%•enuon Tlo• avtrrlck on the anuthurvt PLAN corner of illl;hhnd and Ft lu�rda Avuuo Is relocated to the Intersee- tlon of lllghland and Ftlranda Avooues, Or"w � r u WINDROW II WINWDW t t r 0 F s WINDROW VERY LOW PARK DEN5ITY WINDROW VERY Low/ Vcusln WINCeoW �\ ALT t:NooL WINDROW WINDROW WINDROW WINDROWS WINDRoW WINDRoW .V" /ALT / `{ l i ExN,arr H 1► 0 F 0` 500, loan' Um meo"i M PRojecr 16 Co GENERAL PLAN MEOIVM pENSIT( MI..� CITY 0' AANCDO CUCAMONGA • M NORANDUM Date: December 5, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subjectt eARRf1AY DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY LIST ABSTRACT: At the November 15, 1979 meeting of the Advisory Commission, they unanimously recommended that the City maintain, clean and ratrof it landscaping and irrigation of the parlvays along Cornellan Avenue north of Baseline and Carnelian south of Baseline to the approximate extension of Church. On November 28, 1979 the name recommendation vas made by the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: A list of seven items were presented to bath the Advisory Com- mission and Planning Commission in order to allow them to choose a pilot project that would demons:rate the City's program for the use of beautification fees The seven projects are: 1. Maintain, clean and retrofit landscaping and irrigation to the parkways Y along Carnellan Avenue north of Baseline and retrofit landscaping on r �' Carnelian Avenue south of Baseline to the approximate extension of Thud Street. 2. Retrofit landscaping and irrigation of the parkways on Baseline Road north and south aide from western City limits to Haven Avenue, 3. Retrofit landscaping and Irrigation of the parkways an Archibald Avows from 19th Street south of Foothill Blvd. 4. Install landscaping in tho minting median Islands on Foothill Blvd. at the intersection of Archibald Avenue. 5. Retrofit landscaping and irrigation to the sidewalk area along 19th Street from Sapphire to Carnelian 6. Retrofit landscaping and Irrigation of the parkways along Hellman Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Blvd. 7 Retrofit landscaping and irrigation of the parkway along Arrow Route between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue. It should be noted that the Planning Commission and the Advisory Commission both felt that all of these projects were Important; however, it vas not a ratter of A prioritizing which project comes before another, rather a matter of selecting ? {� one project as a pilot program for the City, because of the limited funds avail- to able Roth the Planning Commission and the Advisory Comission felt that inch of the remaining Stems should be looked at in relation to the next Years' budget and the Capital rmprovement Program. RECOMMEMIATION: The Planning Commission and tee Advisory Comissi-in recommend [hn[ the City Council use the Beautification Pees that have currently been collected for the maintcnance, cleaning, retrofitting of landscape and irriga- tion to the parkway• along Carnelian Avenue, north of Baseline and retrofit landscaping along Carnelian Avenue south of Baseline to the approximate exten- sion of Church. Respectfully su.•m ttad, ADC i:A4, Dtrecfor of L 41L ComMunity Development 1L:BKN:nm n 1 + CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONC.A 0 MEMORANDUM DATE: December S. 1979 TO: City Council 8 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer sDBJECT: STORM DRAIN COIMITTEE SELECTION As a part of the contract for thi Storm Drain Master Plan Update, it was envisioned that an Adv+sary Committee would be formed to review consultant reconmendations for policy and drainage system design. This Committee will review findings and nuke racomnendations to the City Councii for adoption It is recommended that the Committee include the folicwing: 1Two -(2 reprezentatives of the City Council Tw:' (23 representatives of the Planning Commission - 1 representative from each Advisory Committee �l'' 17aro 2 representatives from the Chamber of Commerce One 1 representative from San Bernardino County Flood Control District The Committee will meet a few times in the next month to establish policy. The Committee will then meet sporadically over the next year dealing with various aspects of the study That the Council approve the formation of the Committee as recommended and select two members to serve. Respectfully suh 1t Llo :..obbs Cit Engineer LBH: deb V 109 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 5, 1979 TO: City Council 6 city Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPEAL OF STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDING PERMIT - BONNEVILLE Attached for Council review is a letter from Mr and Mrs Joseph Bonneville requesting waiver of street improvements in conjunction with a building permit application in the Etiw3nda area The subject property is located at the northwest corner of 23rd Street and East Avenue. In accordance with Ordinance 58 and 58A and the City access policy, the appli+ cant will be required to construct full street improvements on the frontage of its parcel and to the nearest maintained dedicated street The applicants' to their appeal have indicated that they wish to have improvements waived at this tin.2 to protect a eucalyptus windrow and because they feel the improve- ments are not warranted at this time. then Kortapeterol ti split larThe issues eoftprovidinglafroved access9tonaodedi- cated street is the same, however, the approval invol•:ed in this case is a building permit rather than a lot split. On the issue of windrow preservation, the Engineering Division is unable at this time to precisely define in detail the precise location and configuration of the Improvements The staff, where possible, is attempting at this time to encourage alignments tof streetsaand nvariations non standard istreet tsec tionse alternate In order to facilitate resolution of these kinds of issues, the staff is currently preparinq a rural road standards and policy statement for review of the Planning commission in January of 1980. At the time that these standards are fully developed, additional options may be available to reduce standards to allow lowered improvement costs and additional flexibility for windrow preservation. Until these standards are developed, the staff would be willing to work with the applicant that with City policy 110 Appeal of Street Improvements Page 2 December 5, 1919 j RECOITIENDATIOH: O Since the Planning Commission wilt be reviewing and recommending additional Policy the JPlanningsComniss on orstheir review t and thei City f Council not take an action on this until the rural roads standards report is sub - mltted by the Commission. Meanwhile, staff will work with the applicant during this time. Respectfully sub itted, LL YY B HUBBS City Engineer LBM•nn r" t 4 r, i rrf 0 P 13031 Pinon Street (riwanda CA 91739 November 15, 1979 t ty Count,il ty of IIAnckl Cucamonga pat ,friar frost and Clty Councilmen, h<tentls ,.a %opI'ed to t4u Ck%y %% a+ .A Cvtamonga fo, a buildlnc ih s a.:•. for colt \, uct ron of y m ivate r"Idence In our grove 'uc yta 1% the CarnC, of jlyd St•Cet and East Avenue to to +,AI -dnla with ('% X, v, Sd and 50A, the City has required us to Fa,. and vurk .,v, f,nntlye t*ji problem Is that by paving and turbino the west t Jo 0 the •oad on vv, ''CP^t.,a. with a 01 foot road we would need to �tv.e he entire cat% *Pk (225 feet) of eucalyptus trees This is Irp uc %1,31 for a 1tt-ker of First we •- alntal- a iotking citrus grow It Is regularly watered, vned sprayed, etc 6asides keeping with the "Old Californla" beauty 0 nu• co,v,gnity, the grove provides taro montl's Ilmmil income for our fam, I, the autallptua rtns provide our only protection from frost damage. The east re,. 's espatially I.y.ortant because It protects the trees and fruit f,t t the Sants Ana, winds Thole are no other groves or development to the nor ,.a or east OC' our property, consequently our grove takes the brunt of Santa Ane wind force s,,,0(A9 over the foothills As you can see, our eastern sucalyotol row provides a unique protection for our fruit Second, there are no homes or developed driveways on East Avenue above Summit Avenue At this time we question the need for a developed road We feel the conveniences created by a road are far outweighed by the practical necessity of maintaining our eucalyptus row At this tine we •Auld be willing to ent into an agreement with the City to rokc the required nnprovemnts to Avenue property the time the west side of East Avenue, 1 f CIO I 4 u 4 1 � 1979 q 8,9000111111121311,,,8 z pia Thank you, i Joseph w Bonneville J, L ., /•, r I •. -C.-(— Acbecca Oonnevllle 1 .t •'Irc�cco /7�'7YIJ1, • CC 5t79- i5s 9 City of RANCHO • CUCAMONGA November 15, 1979 Mr and Mrs. Joseph Bonneville 17031 Pinon Street Btivanda, California 91739 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bonneville: In respinse to your letter requesting a hearing before the City Council, this is to inform you the matter has been scheduled for the December 5, 1979 City Council meeting The meeting will be in the new Lion's Perk Community Center located at 9161 Baseiino This was the former CSA -50 Building next to the public library The meeting begins at 7100 p.m. You will be sent an agenda so you will be prepared as to where in the meeting the item will come up If you have any further questions, please call. Sincerely, Beverly chalet Deputy City Clerk 8 113 POST OFFICF. BOX 793, RANCIln rl' •AAnVCA PALIFnRN1A n171n !7141 eqq 1 ►q does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Lack of Improvements Hnzardous. The lack of full frontage improvements adjoining a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or parking Ire is hereby found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians and vehicalar traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City. SECTION 2: Streets and dighways - Dedication Required. No building or saructure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for parking purposes, and no building pctmlt shall be issued therefor, unless one -half (1/2) of the street, which is located on the same side of the center line of the street as such lot, hag dedicated right - of -wav for the full width of the lot slunk all street frontages so as to meet the Master Plan and /or Standards for such street In addition to required drlicatlon for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sever, water or other utility purposes may also be required In connection ( with building permits where such dedication to necessary to prevent the flooding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to required utilities SECTION n: In the event construction of full frontage im- provements is not Immcdlateiy required, any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having an interest in the pre ,,erty including beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title company approval. by the City Engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney and the City Engineer, and shall continue in effect until the City Council accepts or rejects such offer. SECTION A: Construction of Public Improvements - Required Generally Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing or arranging for the construction of anv parking lot or commercial, residential nl irda.trial building or buildings, or building addition of alteration, shall rrovide for ti.e construction or installation to City Standards, of sldrvalkq, turns, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the center line of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot an vhlcb the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered SECTION 5: Exceptions (n) A single-family residence where the square foot area of such addltlonn does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the area of the residential oartion of the hntldt..e. et.rt-. - -t -- .- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR i DEDICATION OF RICRT -OF -WAY AND FOP CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY IMPROVEMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH BUILDING ACONSTRUCTION I The City Council of the City of Ptncho Cucamonga, Cellfornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Lack of Improvements Hnzardous. The lack of full frontage improvements adjoining a lot or parcel occupied or to be occupied by a building, structure or parking Ire is hereby found and declared to be hazardous for pedestrians and vehicalar traffic and detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City. SECTION 2: Streets and dighways - Dedication Required. No building or saructure shall be erected, enlarged or altered and no property shall hereafter be improved for parking purposes, and no building pctmlt shall be issued therefor, unless one -half (1/2) of the street, which is located on the same side of the center line of the street as such lot, hag dedicated right - of -wav for the full width of the lot slunk all street frontages so as to meet the Master Plan and /or Standards for such street In addition to required drlicatlon for street purposes, additional dedication for storm drain, sever, water or other utility purposes may also be required In connection ( with building permits where such dedication to necessary to prevent the flooding of adjacent or nearby properties or to permit connection to required utilities SECTION n: In the event construction of full frontage im- provements is not Immcdlateiy required, any person required to dedicate land by this section shall make an irrevocable offer to dedicate property, executed by all parties having an interest in the pre ,,erty including beneficiaries and trustees of deeds of trust as shown by a current preliminary title report prepared by a title company approval. by the City Engineer. Such offer of dedication shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney and the City Engineer, and shall continue in effect until the City Council accepts or rejects such offer. SECTION A: Construction of Public Improvements - Required Generally Any person, owner, lessee, or agent constructing or arranging for the construction of anv parking lot or commercial, residential nl irda.trial building or buildings, or building addition of alteration, shall rrovide for ti.e construction or installation to City Standards, of sldrvalkq, turns, gutters, street trees, street lighting, street paving to the center line of the street, and necessary drainage structures unless such improvements already exist along all street frontages adjoining the lot an vhlcb the building or parking lot is to be constructed, enlarged or altered SECTION 5: Exceptions (n) A single-family residence where the square foot area of such addltlonn does not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the area of the residential oartion of the hntldt..e. et.rt-. - -t -- .- of the prepared alterations (b) anotlexceedlfl residence when the value value of the bull ding being altered prior to its alteration SOL) of the carports, storage huildings)andosimilar lnoo- residentialobuildingsagee, to accessory to single - family resldences where such construction or addition does not exceed five hundred (500) square feet to irea SECTION 6: Construction of Public fm rovements - Prerequis- ite to Aepraval of th e Building Official. Official shall deny issuanceeof aaprovided in Section 5, the Buildin;, rccupancy or deny final o building permit, or deny approval for connections to any building and acceptanro [or public utility improvements exist, or are constructed ort their ! construction ! is guaranteed by an executed agreement and cash money deposited with the City in a sum approved by the City Engineer based upon one - and - one -half (1 -1 /2) times the estimated cost of construction SECTI04 7: Construction Agreement ef[ec[lve on the date of th construction o guarantee agreement e deposit Of and shallend shall upon the date of completion to the sntiafartion of the City Engineer of all A required to be made Upon completion of the improvements Improvements their acceptance by the City, the cash deposit shall he returned end to the owner. The City is authorized, In the event of any default, to use any or all of the deposit money to cause 411 of the required work to he done or completed, and for payment of all costa and expcn%es therefote Any money remaining shall be refunded to the owner SECTION 8• City Standard, The Engineer is standards for the construction lnndtinatallationauthorized of osidewalks,acurbs,h gutters, street trees, street IighInR, street paving and storm drain structures SECTION 9: No Encroachment Without Permit. No erected, enlarged or altered if l![ndoea[rortwaul d, encroach lot shall be public d I, Oct or right -of -way unless an encroazh�cnt permit In first obtained from the City Engineer Th e City Engineer may ¢rant an encroachment permit If he determines that the encroachment af11 not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. t SECTION 10: The ?favor shall sign this Or'lnance and the sae Clerk shall attest ht the seen, and the City rlr,k 0,11 rnuFt the same to he publl4hed within fifteen days after Its pasoarn at least Once in The Dally A_rnnrt, a newspaper of general circulation, published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated !n the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California — — Ur dlnaace No. 58 Page 7 1979. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of February, • AYES: Frost, Niknls, Palombo, Nest, Schlosser NOES: None ABSENT: None , n H67—or ATTEST: nn u LI It i_ ■ Page ) 1979. PASSED, APPROVED, end ADOPTED this 21st day of February, AYE::: Frost, Nikels. Palumbo, West, Sthlosse- NOES: None ARSENI: N,.ne L� or ATTEST: CSty Clark �• 0 It I,- ORDINANCE NO 58 -A AN ORDINANCE OF 171E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH) tNG EgUIREHENTS FORADEDICATION ORDINANC NO R.JUNCTION VITII BUILDING CONSTRUCTION The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, l does ordain as follows! SECTION 1: ordinance No 58 shall Ise mended to read as follows: Section 5: Exceptions The provisions of Section 4 shall not apFly to: (a) Alterations: (b) Reconstruction; (c) an adiition to a single Emily residence when the addition d•es not exceed 650 square feet in area; (d) conatruction of garages, carports, storage buildings, patio cnvnT9, swimming pools, spas, and similar structures, accessory to a single family residence SZCTIDN 2: The Moyor shall sign this Ordinascs and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall sauce the same to be published within fifteen (15) days atter its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation pub fished in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in tie City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th day of June 1979 AYES: Palembo, Schlosser, Mikels. Bridge, Frost HOES: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: citAcl � I City Clerk � •� Ir �3 m • h 2 M 0 R A N D U M NovemTe—rcr.—iWT TO: City Council /City Manager FROM: Finance Dire or SUBJECT: Security /Fire Loss It is requested that City Council authorizes the transfer of $6,000.00 from contingency to the Capital accounts of Administration. Finance, Community Services and Community Development, for the purchase of one fireproof safe and five fire proof file cabinets. The need ar1•es the fact that the City offices do not have adequate fire protection to safeguard valuable records And documents critical - to the operation of the City functions. The City Auditors have also expressed a desire to see the City obtain needed equipment to provide security and fire protection to certain financial records, ordinances, and resolutions. As evidenced by the recent fire bombing incident that occurred in the same complex that the City offices are located, points out the fact that a fire need not even originate in our facility. Someone elses carelessness or deliberate acts could cause us to suffer needless losses. HJE:cak X ti =� i ti'ai