Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1979/12/19 - Agenda Packet
M A C E N D A CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LSon's Park Community Center 9161 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga Regular Heating December 19, 1979 ACEVDA ITEYE -- NOTE: All Mess scbnitted for the City Council aqenda must be in writing. rho deadline for submittl:S Items Is 5:00 p.m. on the 7hu.•sday prior to Lee first and third Mednesday or etch month The City C1erA•s offle- resolved all such Item, 1. CALL TO CRDER. a. Pledge to Flag 34,4- w,iCL,fGa_ b Roll CsLI: Mikele -4, Palonboz—, Schlosser, Brldgo—�,, Prost,2S_. c. Approval of Minutes: November 21, 1979. 2 A. \'NOUNCl ENIS. a. Council b Staff 3. CWOLISSIOY REPORTS. a. Advisory Commisal -n b Historical Comlasion 4. CONSENT CALMA.R. The roilowing Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non- conGrovrorsial. Thoy will be acted upo., by the Cnuncll at one tim without discussion Any Council member stall mmber, .r interested party my request that an Item be removed from the Consent Calendar moor later discussion a. Approval of Varrants. Register No. 79 -12 -19 for $458,550 82. 1 b Set for public hearing an January 2, 1980: Appeal of Site Approval 3 No. 79 -19 - 0 nt1.. Richfield Company. Improvements and con - version to existing service station located at 9533 Foothill into a mini -mart station c Parcel Nap 4907: Acceptance of Parcel Yap, Agreement and Bonds. 4 Located northeast corner of Cleveland 6 4th St Developer, Vinco Stagllano. Faithful Perfortance Bond (road) $92,000 1� Labor 6 Haterisl (road) $92,000 MonumntaCloa $ 2,500 0 0 ME City Ccuntil Agenda -2- December 19, 1979 RESOLUTION NO. 79 -108 6 A RESOLUTI04 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4907, (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO 4907) INPROVe- MENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY d Parcel Map 4957: Acceptance of parcel Hap, Agreement and Bonds 7 Located southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman Developer: Douglas and Kathleen Hone Improvement Security (road) $30,000 RESOLUTION NO 79 -101 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI71 OF RA::CHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 4957, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4957), I7IPAOVEHENT ACREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECT1ITY. e Parcel Nap 4820: Acceptance of Parcel Map. Agreement and Bonds 10 Located southwest comer of Hallman and 9th St Developer: Springer Company, Inc RESOLUTI04 NO 79 -106 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4820 I Parcel Hap 5157: Acceptance of Parcel Map Agreement and Bonds 19 Located northwest corner of Haven and 4th St Developer: John D Lusk 6 Son Performance Bond $253,000 Labor b Material $253,000 Honumentation $ 3,500 RESOLUTIGN NO. 79 -107 _15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUHBkR 5157, (TENTATIVE 1 RCEL MAP NO 5157) IMPROVE - HENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY g. Refer claim by Robert J Parcell in the amount of $70.05 to the 16 City Attorney for handling. 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. An Ordinance repeal.ng Ordinance No. 78 and the use of safe and sane 19 fireworks within the City of Rancho Cucamonga ORDINANCE NO. 78 -A (second reading) 19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIf. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REPEALING IN ITS ERIREIy ORDINANCE NO. 78 RELATING TO REGULATING THE STORAGE, USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SANE PTIELVRKS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA. City Council Agenda -3- D- comber 19, 1979 B. General Plan Amendment No. 79 -03D. 79 -03F, and 79 -031 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Council at Its December 5, 1979 meeting, reviewed all of the General Plan Amendments and completed the public hearing However, because the Council desired certain changes to General Plan Amendment No 79 -03F, the final Resolution was not adopted. All changes which the Council had requested have been made in Resolution No. 79 -102 RESOLUTION NO 79 -102 i 22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN C. Ordinances dedignating historical landmarks and points of interest 32 in Rancho Cuamonga. ORDINANCE NO 92 (second reading) 32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE CASA DE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO VINERY AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LAND - HARK ORDINANCE NO. 93 (second reading) 33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF `� ,r - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE a3 GARCIA RANCH HOUSE, SYCAMORE INN, THE CUCAMONGA SI'-E. Y`" �j o -•j'1' CHTNAr0WN THE COUSINS HOUSE, THE MILLIKEN RANCH, AND TILE TAPIA ADOBE SITE AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINTS OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THERE- FORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST D. Request of Historic Preservation Commission for designation 34 of the Alta Loma Railway Station site as a Point of Historic Interest The Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing on November 13, 1979 regarding the designation of the Plta Loma Railway Station as a historic landmark of the city After con- siderable discussion, the Commission voted unanimously that the landmark designation van not feasible for va-ious technical reasons not related to its historical significance However, the Cnmmission voted unanimously to recommend to Council a designa- tion as a Point of Historic Interest. ® Recommendation: It is recommended that the Alta Loma Railway Station be designated as a Point of Historic Interest and that Ordinance No. 95 be adopted. City Council Agenda -4- December 19, 1919 ORDINANCE NO 95 (first reading) 47 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 2-"'a RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ALTA LO.NA RAILWAY STATION SITE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THERE - PURE DESIGHATE,�S IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST J, &\ E. Vacation of Alde Street. December 19, 1979 has been set for public hearing on the vacation _g of offer of dedication for Alder Street Notice of the Public Nearing was published in the Daily Report on December 3, 1979. No objections to the proposed vacation has been received. RESOLUTION NO 79 -109 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO DE VACATEC A PORTION OF ALDER STREET, AN OFFER GF U DEDICATION AS SHOWN ON HAP (No V -005) ON FILE IN THE OFFICE Or THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. • F Condominium Conversions. 54 0 The Planning Division has received preliminary requests for the conversion of rental units to ownership unite This has prompted the City to address the issue of condominium conversions. Interest in converting has resulted from many factors including expanding rent control laws, difficulty in obtaining loans for apartment pro- jects, and the potential profits to be made from such conversions Many cities in California have adopted regulations and development standards for condominium conversions to offset this demand. Presently, Rancho Ci :amooga has no ordinance governing condominium conversions. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance placing a freeze on condominium conversions and proceed with the work program to develop an ordinance regulating condominium conversions ORDINANCE NO. 97 (urgency) S9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A �. � f• MORATORIUM ON THE FILING OF TENTATIVE MAPS FOR n THE PURPOSE OF CONVERTIP.0 IXISTING RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY INTO CONDOCNINIUMS, COMMUNITY APARTMENTS, OR STOCK COOPERATIVES, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF City Council Agenda -5- December 19, 1979 G. Revision to Ordinance No. 8, Section 7, of the Park Tax Fee Ordinance. 61 In October Council directed staff to clarify Section 7 of Ordinance No 8 dealing with park tax cridit The Planning Commission, at its meeting of December 12, 1979, recom- mended that the City council amend Ordinance No 8 by deleting Section 7 in its entirety This recommendation was mado on the basis that the General Plan consultants are preparing a Park and Recreation Element and that data is needed so that a new ordinance can be written to conform with the objectiver of that element. Therefore, in the Interim, the Commission has suggested elimination of Section 7 of Ordinance No S. It Is the City's intent that upon adoption of the Parks and Recreation Element that Ordinance No 8 would be revised in it,; entirety to be consistent with cte standards and policies as set forth in the new element Recommendation: It Is recomsended that the City Council adopt the _ Ordinance which eliminates Section 7 of Ordinance No 8 ORDINANCE NO. 8-A (first reading) �� 65 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE • NO. 8 (ELIMINATING SECTION 7 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND AME! %DING SECTION 8, 9, AND 10) AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PARR AND RECREATION TAX FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. H. Negative Declaration dnd Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 79 -05 - 66 City of Rancho Cucamonga. An Crdlmnce establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Community Developments. As the City Council will recall, there have been two presentations for proposed planned co mmunities, Terra Vista and Victoria Together these planned communities encompass over 7,000 acres of land within the heart of the City of Rancho Cucamonga In order to guide the development of the Planned Communities and provide for all of the amenitles desired, the Staff and Planning Commission have developed a Planned Community Ordinance Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt Ordinance No 94 which establishes standards and review procedures for a Planned Community Development ORDINANCE NO. 94 (first reading) 90 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING AYEND.MENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AED REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNCD CO)CRJNITY DEVF.I.OFF- CO i RENTS. o r t City Council Agenda -6- December., 1979 1, • I. Negative Declaration dnd Zone Change No. 79 -09 - Anderson. 99 A change o' zone from R -1 to R -3 on 19 11 acres of land ' located on the cast side of Vineyard, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends that Ordinance No 96 be adopted approving the issuance of Negative Declaration and adopting the zone change No 79 -09 ORDINANCE NO. 96 (first reading) 110 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`IONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 2,18.141 -02, AND 14 MOM R 1 TO R -3 ON 19.11 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON TUL FAST STUE OF VINEYARD AVENUE SOU711 OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 6. CITY NAYACER'S STAFF RLPORTS. A. Request by Central School District for increase in SO-20L Cpga{�- 111 SWEf report by Lauren H. Wasserman. 't U} The Central Schuol District has submitted a revised request for an Increase in SB -201 fees which are charged to developers for interim classroom units at the time building permits are issued The school district has requested that the fees be increased from the present rate of $908 to $1,:10 per dwelling unit for the remaining 134 approved unite in order to provide adequate school room facilities for those students resulting from the development Recommendation: If the City Council wishes to change the fees for interim classroom facilities, the staff will draft an appropriate ordinance for consideration at the January S City Council meeting. B. A Bicycle Licensing Resolution. 113 The City Attorney has drafted a Revolution which, if approved by the City Council, will permit the City to license all bicycles or motorized bicyces within the City of Rancho Cuc rmonga. The Resolution has been drafted in accordance with Division 16 7 of the California Vehicle Code Essentlally,the Code requires that all bicycles be licensed by: (a) January 31, 19809 (b) twenty days after a bicycle has been purchased in the City by a resident of the City, and (c) twenty days after the bicycle is first brought into the City by a resi- dent of the City The Vehicle Code also permits the City to authorize retail establish- ments to issue bicycle licenses It is, therefore, recommended that the two bicycle shops which currently operate within the City of Rancho Cucamonga be designated as places to purchd,te bicycle licenses. Licenses will also be available at the Sheriff's Station and at the City Offices City Council Agenda -7- December 19, 1979 The Vehicle Code specified that fees collected for bicycle licenses shall be used to improve bicycle safety programs and to establish bicycle facilities including bike paths and lanes within the City limits. The fee schedule as as follows: a. For each new bicycle license and registration certificate, the sum shall not exceed $2 00 per year or any portion thereof. b. For each transfer of registration, the arm shall not exceed $1 00. c. For each replacement of a bicycle license or registration certificate, the sum shall not exceed $1.00. SA L d For each bicycle license renewal, the sum shall not exceed p,lM •� Y G per year ✓ Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt Resolution No 79 -105 It is further recoxmended that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 79 -104 setting the basic fees for bicycle licenses and renewals RESOLUTION NO. 79 -105 119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF O RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING THE REGISTRA- TION AND LICENSING OF BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED BICYCLES RESOLUTION NO 79 -104 1 120 r A RESOLVTION OF THE CITY COIR:CIL OF TICE Ciry OF n RANCHO CUM40NGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHINU FEES �j a FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BICYCLE LICENSE AND ALSO THE RENEWAL THEREOF. C. SCAG Resolution an Growth Forecast Policy. 122 As the City Council 1s aware, staff has come before you In the past for your concurrence through the adoption of a resolution on the SCAG Wastewater Plan which was not adopted by the Council and for concurrence and support of the SCAG Air Quality Maintenance Plan which was adopted by the Council Each of the two documents were developed using SCAG -78 Growth Forecast Policy as a population sulde. Before Council for consideration is a Resolution in which we concur with the use of the SCAG -78 Growth Forecast Policy as a guide for the use in regional plans ® RESOLUTION NO. 79 -111 128 /1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 1/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN CONCURRENCE WITH THE SCAG -78 GROWTH FORECAST POLICY City Council Agonda -8- December 19, • D. Award of Traffic Signal Contract: Baseline and Hellman: Archibald 1979 129 and Church Street (FAU) Oral report by i.loyd Hubbs E. Car Allowance for Senior Planner. Report by Lauren Wasserman 130 In the preparation of the budget, we inadvertently excluded the position of Senior Planner from the car allowance The Senior ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 8, 1980. Planner uses his car for City purposes in the dispensation of his duties and should be compensated the same as other managers That- are funds available for this compensation. F. Resolutions regarding Election Hatters. Report by Lauren Wasserman As discussed at the December S City Council meeting, Information regarding the filing of nomination papers with associated `ees have been put into Resolution form. A summary of Resolution No 79 -_10 is: Candidate's statement: Hay include name, -ge, and occupation and a brief description not to exceed 200 words • fee of $25 is established to process the nomination papers. • deposit of $175 is required as the prorate share of printing and handling of the candidate's statement Rebuttal arguments shall not exceed 300 words. A Spanish translation of the candidate's statement is to be inclosed in the Voter's Pamphlet. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -110 131 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR C10MIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO L MATERIALS SUB.YITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID / CITY V.4 1VESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980 I[If0. 1,14 �l� �at4iw` 3, Also, reLring to the elections, St is necessary that a Resolution V& be adoptei requesting the services of the Registrar of Voters. They will be supplying the City with: Precinct index of registered voters. Combined roster index of voters by voting precinct, and data processing tape fnr sailing lubele RESOLUTION NO 79 -112 133 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TM% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTIN, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO PERHIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF SAID COUNTY TO RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A CMERAL HUNICIPI ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL 8, 1980. City Council Agenda -9- December lq, 1979 • / f� Revivv of Project Esperanto's Quarter Annual Performance 134 Report. Staff report by William Holley. H. Report re. Codification. Oral report by Lauren Wasserman. I Set Jaruary, 2, 1980 for public hearing on the right to exercise the right of Eminent Domain to acquire easements across property for the conerruction and maintenance of public streets for the development of Vineyard Avenue 7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8 NEW BUSINESS_ a. Council b Audience 9 ADJoUR.\mmr. •Re67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Q I ARR 0 YEN Y V E N 0 C R N A M E ti �- 00325 7815 PRENTIC HALL INC Y 00326 2470 CCUNTY oX COLLECTOR OC327 6910 UCLA EXTENSION 00329 8313 S ANLB RNOfY.ONCO EMO OY C e 00331 7985 PUBLICNEOF RETIREMENT S OC332 2277 CHASES KENNETH OC333 1125 OAKER, BENNIE 00334 3401 ESSIG RCB RTA 0 00335 1200 BANK NF eN RICA 00336 1500 BLUE CROSS 00337 0025 REITER DEVELOPMENT A H 00338 3305 EMPLCYNEENT OF OCPf 00399 5275 INTL Cl V MGT ASSOC 00340 1500 BLUE CROS 00+342 83133 SAN LAUDIA COO EMPLOY C 0 00346 7185 PUBLICS�NPRPET FRANCIS S w 00347 269C DEER CREEK CO 00349 677C GLEMI SCDAnLMES SOOFACASAVING 4 027258 8525 S TATIONENS(R,COPEpMERA SHO 02826 VCIC FORM gS ALRNM EE NT w 0z28Z28 VOI gC FORMS ALIGNM ENTEE y�pd 02830 0027 AE6TMRTOIEINGOE "900Y SHO 02832 0307 AMERICANU ELECTRIC • 02833 104C f.OR00N AYERS CAMERA SHO 02034 1108C 8 C K FLE WHCLESALE R MA w 022036 111300 BALSELINENHARDWARE ASSOC 02838 1900 L C ENGINEERING w 02839 0 208C C K AL POLY CKELLOGGIUNIT P 02041 2450 CO SAN BERNARDINO SHERI 02842 43 VCIC CVEINCORONO� 2575E 02044 2575 CUCAMCNCA CO HATER 01ST 02345 46 2595 61C WILLIAMSA PRINTINd, 0 w 02848 2671 CALEY SHARPR INC 02850 2890 CREW CARRIAGEt1G /TROPHY w 02852 4600 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 02853 4700 GOROCNS INC 02854 4795 GUADAGNINC JAMES 02855 4797 GUYS C GALS WORK TOGS w 02856 4815 HARRISON HEATING C2B57 4835` HENDRYCKS, DAN 02859 5140 16L`A%G PCWER SWEEPINGSM w 02860 6175 JOBS AVAILAELE 19! 02862 6600 KjIGNENG IMEFRSA7LSa JOM 02863 6623 L C M CO NS TRUC�I CN w OZe64 6740 LEONARD SDAVID 0'065 2866 7182 FANNG� CONS TRUCTICNC 02867 195 MARTIN, JOHN ® 02869 7294 MECKENMbEVELOPMENT 02870 7297 M OWAY BIOGG MAIL 02871 7303 MI``F.S FRECOIE 8 ' w 02872 732C PRMN CAR WASH Register No 79 -12 -19 UNT NET 2. It 9e 5a 100, 500.00 193.50 i 1x006.63 222.60 73.17 695.00 573.17 77.27 3.574.00 2132.56 139.191.00 2s 049.90 453.92 1. s, • w • • NARR OA T • :L - .. - _ _�. _ .. .• -.rte CISCCUNT NET 4 32s 3, 520 458,550.82 0 1 4��a�tuA�.�•� {�i^t,�r(' -^1pp1 �r �', T'>V `..VGn.'�w.:�+,x ^: —- I'�a��....v� `�; —� -+'�S R867 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA « NARR A VEN 4 V E N 0 0 R N A H E 02873 7376 PONAHAN, CLAUDIA d 02874 7500 GAYALAN NO N 02876 7744 PIANTEDOOCSI, ROCCO w 02878 02879 T77C 7820 PATTONNSALESRlOBPE PRIDE COLOR PRESS • 02880 7825 PROGRESS BULLETIN 02882 t SERVICE 020.83 8075 8g11p7 RAPIOOOATAP INC KENNETH A pTppAIC, NCOMM AHOSPLT 02887 831E SREYNOLSCcDS �NTANT OHIO "M1 02168 8311 55 SAN BOND CO SURVEYOR • 028910 02892 8390 8525 S VTNEEERNACALIFA EDISON CO STATIONERSACORPGAS " 02893 8532 SULLIVAN, R • 02894 8675 TEXACO IAC 02896 92z125 VALHLEYUSCUNCH pRpI,EC SYS 02898 HF ALPTCTALSaN . VtI IC IN • w • • NARR OA T • :L - .. - _ _�. _ .. .• -.rte CISCCUNT NET 4 32s 3, 520 458,550.82 0 1 4��a�tuA�.�•� {�i^t,�r(' -^1pp1 �r �', T'>V `..VGn.'�w.:�+,x ^: —- I'�a��....v� `�; —� -+'�S El CLTY OF RANCHO CuCAMO1CA Date: December 19, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: Jack Lan, Director of Ctmmunity Development Subject: CONSENr CALENDAR Please set the following for public hearing: Appeal of Site Aaerayal No. 79 -19 - Atlantic Richfield Ccm n,- Improvemeacs and conversion to existing service station located at 9533 Foothill into a miai -wart station. Set for public hearior brfore the City Council at its meeting of January 2, 1980. Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19, 1979 TO: City Council d City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 4907 - ACCEPTANCE OF MAP, AGREEMENT AND BONDS The subject Parcel Map consists of 26 parcels on 17.5 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Cleveland Avenue and 4th Street. This subdivision is adjacent to the newly formed street assessment district for industrial properties south of Arrow Route and east of Haven Avenue This proposed development will be among those in this area and expected to proceed during 19e0. The developer, Vince Stagliano, has made arrangements with the Cucamonga County Water District for the installation of their facilities. The following Improvement securities have been submitted for acceptance by the City for street irprovements, Faithful Performance (Road) $92,000.00 Labor b Matorial (Road) $92,000.00 Morumentation $ 2,500.00 RECOMMENDATION- It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached r- solution and direct: 1 The Mayor and City Clerk to sign-the agreement on behalf of the City 2 The City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City. 3 The City Engineer to forward the map for recording Respectfully submitted, ' Lloyd 'f Hubbs C t Engineer LBH :deb 4 • • 7 r � • HF, ie _1 + tj cy- 1 �t V 1 it � 1• 1 �� CF , �F w J • L 1 s •. J to t• .. 5•{ � 1 1 � �'MI I � l 1� ' 1(• t vi �i'I / � �I Ila =11Ia • ' ~ �sd 7 f Yi • RESOLUTION NO 79 -108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 4907, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 4907) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4907, submitted by Vince Stagliano, and consisting of 26 parcels, located at the northeast corner of Cleveland and 4th, being a division of a portion of Section 13, Township 1 south, Range 7 west was approved I, the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 15, 1979, and, WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 4907 is the final map of the division of land approved as shorn on said tentative parcel map; and. WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by Vince btagliano and Kacor Realty as developer; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and :aid improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map Number 4907 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST 0 _Zi r '__F- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA v MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL NAP 4957 - ACCEPTANCE OF MAP, AGREEIIENT AND BONDS The subject Parcel Map consists of 3 parcels and 3 acres of land located on the southeast comer of Base Line and Hellman Avenue. The developer, DULglas K. Hone and Kathleen L. Hone, has made arrangements with the Cucamonga County Water District for the installation of their facilities. The folidring improvement security has been submitted for acceptance by the City For street improvements: Improvement Security Instrument (Road) $30,000.00 SIt is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution and direct: 1 The Mayor and City Clerk to sign the agreement on behalf of the City 2 The City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City 3. The City Engineer to forward the map for recording Respectfully submitted, Ll B NpbD I C: y Engineer LBH:deb 1 ? l • I I t f J # I Pe `.n .. RESOLUTION N0. 79-101 • A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCrj=GA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 4957, (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 4957) ,MPROYEMENT AGREEMENT. AND IHPROVDO:NT SECURITY ,,fAS, tentative parcel map number 4957, submitted by Doug Hone, and consisting of three parcels, located on southeast corner of Helican and Baseline, being a division of a portion Of Section Cttyoo ship Rancho South. Range o west parch 15. 1979; by City Engineer WHEREAS, Parcel Hap Nkyber 4957 is the final map of :he division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map: and. WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said city have now been sec met urity by an nou9 None sstdagreement guaranteed by acceptable emen NUM, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City • of Rancho Cu�tnseCUrityf submitted said agreement same said hereby authorized to sign said are hereby approved and the Hater 1s hereby City Clerk o agreement attest; on behalf ai' the city of Rancho Cucamonga. 577 bdatthhethe City clerk hereby aapprovendnd thesaid CityPEngineerpis authorized to present same is hereby my R same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this —day Ot 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT' ATTEST AA iy er YII yor a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ME140PANDUM DATE; December 19, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager PROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 4820 The subject Parcel Map consists of 2 parcels and 4 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street. The developer, Springer Company, Inc., is not required to past bands at this time because there are existing street improvements on the developed portion this land. At the parcel , of Approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map and further directing the . City Engineer to forward the map for recording Respectfully submitted, L1 d B Hubbs City Engineer LBH:deb El )V d i IC It N b3 z� } i� .E E P--4il E1ti -441i 2; p aRile d 2i1 �fil' s I III i R �-- '-_ - - -- I . I Ii �� f — C- -- -- - - -- III I 11 II J. vd3dA u i i I 5 i i i t4 Ll • i �1 �J J. vd3dA u i i I 5 i i i t4 Ll • • RESOLUTION NO 79 -106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 4820 WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 4820, submitted by Linville- Sanderson -Horn and consisting of 2 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Hellman and 9th being a division of Lot 7. Cucam„nga Vineyard Tract was approved by the City Engineer of tht City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS. Parcel Nap Number 4820 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative Parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the C,ty (:until of said City have now been met; NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 4820 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES: NOES: ATTEST V1 ABSENT City Clerk Mayor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: December 19, 1979 TO: City Council 3 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL IMP 5157 - ACCEPTANCE OF MAP, AGREEMENT AND 804DS The subject Parcel Map consists of 40 parcels on 37.8 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and 4th Street. This site is zoned and General Planned for industrial development. This development is being phased and the first phase consists of five buildings. The developer, John D. Lusk 8 Son, has made arrangments with the Cucamonga County Hater District for the installation of their facilities. The following improvement securities have been submitted for aLceptance by the City for street improvements: Performance (Surety) $253,000.00 • Labor b Material (Surety) $253,000.00 Monumentati rv: E 3,500.00 L J RECOMMENDATION: It 1s recommended that the City Council approve the at•rached resolution and direct: 1 The Mayor and City Clerk to sign on behalf of the City, the agrecment 2. The City Clerk and City Engineer to sign the map on behalf of the City 3 The City Engineer to forward the map for recording Respectfully submitted, "Z �� I d B Hibbs L1 y Engineer LBH :deb 13 P�.RCEL MAP ...C, .d I.O •I•�� r..w.� nr i�� •.AyyrW Y...• lJ RESOLUTION NO. 79 -107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5157, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5157) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5157, submitted by John D. Lusk E Son, and consistingof 40 parcels, located at the northwest corner of 4th and Haven, being a division of Lots 25 d 32 of Section 14, Township I south, Range 7 west, was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on May 7, 1979; and, WHEREAS, Parcel flap Number 5157 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of th.t requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an improvement agreement guaranteed by acceptable improvement security by John D. Lusk & Son as developer; NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said improvement agreement and said improvement security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said improvement agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Nap (lumber 5157 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT: ATTEST City Clerk J Mayor CLAIM FOR DAMAGES r E a- V: 9 TO PERSON OR PROPERTY CITY (I i. giC CUCAMONGA mesa ma rest I "•I" INSTniuCrIONS L Cl-GPI-1 dea19/ 7oo OJury to person or to yenoaal rt) mist M It net later khan Ica Dale d the peNrreua. l(ior• Code Sec 911]1 jW Cialme for gqayeages t pre )"y tout be Ned has later than r )err aft" the � .r�pnar C al lg6dca 91t]) - n rt < alto on [Rk.e. S. See 9 +Reg Mgr dlagesm uP® wMeh m Ie 2 a 91+ta of accident. It AMC claim fO t tout tie signed ®rY9+ge 3 at Eotm Act ails. Cilal mu it Ee Missed .Md.h Cit) perk: IOOr�Coda Se �i9 visa) EAI�l 516LT• TO: CITY OF RAJJCHO CUCAM011GA to wwidt,h 7nu desire Mollies or lemmudeaU0111 m W Seat How did DASIAUU M I u s na —r' v'— - ir a........_ ^ n d� 'r ..'-D � 'N IMOL YID WIy^ p� y$Y cn✓ IAI. J/.+ - .1"l1.'1.V re"I"V ('--4 RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No. Age d Clalm+ns (If natural Person) D H A4 " Ur* d'c* f G/,Ke f( 7Z w1,�Zr C Sw•r a 6. / n. it.�re)L/1 4 . IN NA Ck.1/ / /�l �If.y 1 Ca�� YWrff 4YfV Where did DAMAGE or LYJURY Occur? Describe fully. and locate an diagram on reverse nde of this Sheet. where appropriate pee street names and address and mesa mama groin landmarks: Is{ Odwu' r -v are S :1-1 42.wrA -S: . What particular ACT or OMISSION do YOU Claim nu$cd the Injury or damage? Give Damn of City empleyen naaing the kUury or damage. H ksawn: 7QEE �—.I( dYa CrMa. What DA?.IAGE at INJURIES do you claim resulted? Give full extent of InJuries or damage$ claimed: �YM •/ PL I.a �.L7 n�/_..q What AMOUNT Jo you claim on account of each item of Injury or damage u at date of presrnlanon of this claim% giving basis o: computation: L, iaa11. /l 7,0„1, -/- to 4713.09- ®Ive ESTIMATED AMOUNT as far u known you cimm an account of each Item of pmctaClne injury or damage sMng basis o SEE rAGE 2 (OtTYU -213 -o 6- THIS CLAIM MUST BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDI nVhtAT9 OF REPAIRS r C. OJ FOOTHILL - AUTO -BODY 9777 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD CUCAMONOA. CALIFORNIA 91790 jj L PHONE (714) 9974909 Acle frr R. O. ®® _- __ - -VIM .Ol rl. rnM 1N M... ns.1 Yw.M [R �J77O7 I.rl. i i- •- .rr... MI.NY. Y1Y• t I.r.. AYr t 5 .emu wA.w c ..M 011..w.o. / ^I 7dw T.. t • �� O .�i.m unmet Tmu t .F uruw aware t . I arum roru t TOTAL .Ol rl. rnM 1N M... ns.1 Yw.M [R �J77O7 I.rl. i i- •- .rr... MI.NY. Y1Y• t I.r.. AYr t 5 .emu wA.w c ..M 011..w.o. / ^I 7dw T.. t • �� O unmet Tmu t .F uruw aware t . I arum roru t ORDINANCE NO. 78 -A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' C:XIFORNIA, RELATING TOI EREGULA2INGTHE STORAGE,USE AND SALE OF SAFE AND SANE FIRES:ORRS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. The City CO'incil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION is Ordinance No. 78 of the City of :rancho Cucamonga, California, relating to regulating the storage, use Rancho hereby repealed in its entirety. o of SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Crt-cre-BE shall cause the ssame totbetpubl shedawiithindfift ent( Clerk to the 15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, Public —red n tho City of Ontario, California, and circulated in 'ho City of Rancho Cuamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this __ day of 1979. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: ® CtyCer May" o the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1q CITE OF RANC210 CUCAWAMA MEWRANDOM DATE, December 19, 1979 TO, City Council and City Monger "041 Jack lam, Director of 1MCMity Development SUBJECft GENMM PLAN AMENDMENT W. 79 -03D, 79 -03E, 79 -03P, AND 79-031 - CITY OP RANCHO CDCANONGA ABSTRACT, The Council at its abating of December 5, 1979 reviewed all of the above General Plan Amendments and completed the p-tlic hearing. HoWe"r, bneauso the Council dasired certain chaigas to General Plan Amendment No. 19 -03P, the alternative commercial sites, the final Resolution van not - dopcod until tA, Ccuncil could review the final exhibit$. Attached is the Resolution ad.•pting the amendments and the a:hi- bits thereof Exhibits E and P have 1.een ch»nged tc reflect Lta Council's direction at the previous meeting. On Exhibit E the alternative ccmmcrcial site has bean rttainad on the northeast corner of Foothill and Maven and on the northwest cornar of Arr+ Route and navan Avon. On Exhibit R the alternative Commercial sites have been retained on the southwact • corner of Lemon and Haver. Avmuo and on the east side of Haven north of Mighlmd. REC1,M4 DATION, The Plannlnq Ccemission recommends that the City Council approve Ganaral plm Amendments No. 79 -03D, 79 -03P, 79 -03P, 79 -01I by adopting the attached Resolution No 79 -102. Jack Lam, Director of ccmunity Development JL3Hvscc Attachments, Resolution 79 -102 Exhibits ET Cr RESOLUTION hU, 7: -102 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE ADOPIED INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCA- MO;GA GENERAL PLAN E L71EtEAS, the City has established the second meeting in September as the 1979 General Plan Amendment hearing date for Planning Co®tsslon review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a public hearing to consider amendmnts to the General Plan; and .4MEAS, torments were heard and considered both pro and con regarding the requested Central Plan Ameodment; and I.TDIREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended for consideration by the Council four General Plaa Amendments; and WHEREAS. the City Council has held a public hearing on December S, 1979 to consider comments pro and con regarding the General Plan Amnt% to recom- mended by the Planning Commission NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby amend the General Plan Land Use Element as follows: SECTI04 1: For General Plan Amendment No 79 -03D, amend tha Land Use Nap to lends bounded by Red Hill Country Club Drive, 2apia Via, Rancheria Drive, and San Bernardino Road including lands 160' east of Tapia Via and south 3030 from San Bernardino from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residen- r1al (Exhibit "A ") SECTIC For General Plan Amendment !to 79 -03E, awed the 'and Use Map for t• mrthvast comer of Mae Line Avenue and Haven Avenue from Medium Density Residential to Low Density Residential (Exhibit "B ") SECTION 3: For General Plan Amndaent No 79 -037, amending and clarifying the definiticn of Alternative Commercial Site as show on Exhibit nC" through "B" and adoring the following policy changes to the General Plan Text: Alternative Commercial Asterisks show on the Cameral Plan are only general locations and show that there is a potential for the location of shopping a nters in that immediate arm. Depending upon the size of the prop y and the market aces ..erved, the commercial center my be elthe at ighborhood or eoemainity. 2 No more ...an tw commercial centers are to be located at any one tnterse, or a► 3. For neighborhood centers, sites should fall within the approximate size range of 3 to 8 acres and for a coamnity shopping center, sites • should fall within the approximate range of 10 to 30 acres. 4. Comerclal centers should be located at least 1/2 mile apart except for the tmo allowed at intersections. S. When asterisks are located at other than the intersection, they are specific to that site and do not provide for the location of a shopping center in the general vicioity. SECir09 4: Par General Plan dmendsent No. 79-03I, amend the Land Use Map for the property begiming at a point 600' vest of Raven on the north •L" of Base Line and extending approximately 670' along Base Line and ,ztmding north to the Pacific Electric Railroad right -ofway from Lov Density Residential to Medium Density Residential (Exhibit ^I'7. ,EMON Ss Esmmsead adoption of the Negative Declaration for each of the General Plan Amendments, 79-MD, :9 -03E, 79 -037, and 79 -031. ATUST• PASSED. APPROVED. and ADDPr1D this _ day of AYES: Mayor City Clerk �— n 0 • i I � O N p- ', o 1140sawwo.? a ^1ni135 g .. A 3 0 m MW i O O N (Q V m C v�dYl tzy \�F C\ O i b 0 II 8AJ2U 971� .l&1r.107 -nM 07d 1„J A -,- i. :• n ■ n' Ste' /0001 2000' Fl GENERAL PLAN • �r ;MGD. 1141 �:�n f NeD rrNel ,r roof 1 0ov DENSITY KE6IDENTIAL 4L4 1 AM9NATPit 711E �- fbi? ReE�IONAL GENTEK EXHIBIT 6 O 2q • L� GENERAL PLAN Exhlhlt C cenl, l o.< th- a.t •rI -In nn tI,r wrt I..c-t, ar,r. hv.•,t and aouth- ravt crrnera or trot hl II Blvd and V Otrvird inro our antcrink overtaylnp the Inter Srrtlnn rr Frothlll nlvd alxl Vinovard Avrnur l.oW OEN51T'( J Met ceu 2 Fc HI4Ft � peNStTY r,„,,., 2S 5stiVICE CotAt4EgetAt. LOW DE145M SERVICE Cd{MCIitAL EXHIDIT G C% LO GENERAL PLAN • F<h IHtD ell *W its. lhr tar, r l•t cn thr crnthva:t rrrwr of Arrow Route o•tl Archlhnld and rrpinrca the asterisk with nulphlwrhood covruntty land LL9e or 5m, 10001 7.0001 lAw II MEDIVO DEUi1TY vemstTy tnu pEracrtY N1wI14UM IHPALT INOOSTRY NEIGNBDRK%Q QOM UNITY 26 NIGH II • OEUStTY � LOW ` f f DENSITY tzu+s! •wBU� xsD use EXHIBIT Co • ` GENERAL F.xh lhil E el tnin It.•u tl,e m,ler l�k dm:n rrat rlw• Intrtsr, lino n( PLAN Arrm Route "Ill Ilm n Avrn•,e nrl ,•Jda in -1.••ri wt ,vor the Inter - avetton of Turnrr and Arrow Rm,te. AI.n, the arlerink nt tht •nrth- - east corner of F,thill -11111 ilnveo Is moved to the Interiection of Foothill Blvd nod Ilarcn Avennc e 1000 2000' l �b Mi)L_b Vs—WIT SERVicE GMIMCRG '�' nL�l�•A�� rn•,a� , NICEU V� ti,. r.o � NlfdIplVM IDtF�KT INCVSTRY HEDIvM > V1EA 5tTY • LOW '� • OEN 511 W OEM I � . ME DI VF1 DEASIT7 101 u ' iI Lou DENSITY I PARK 27 MA.)co INDUSTRY MA.rr. INDVSIRY EAHIDIT '?, r O GENERAL PLAN • Exihibit and P t side th' astortak: north of Highland Avenue on the east and vest aide of Naysn Avonuo Into one asterisk on Haven between lemon Avenue and Il.gMend Avenue Ala' the a,.uthvest eornor of lomon Avenue and Haven Avenue is designated Neighborhood commu- nity LOW y � oENSITY =; . ;� N�c,�ec�ttap ccMMVNITY n MIXED V5E �p Y N 41' 7,,Lc,Y = ALTE{ZNATIVE EXHOT F P ---� YI ei me [A re GENERAL PLAN C[bl'•It O nmFlo, 11. rl.i nn ?hr :•ulln. �I ,.-rn,r rf No. I,"t ter Avrnu, .1W III, ?•I 11 Av. nm• nud tlw ?r+r?I,u,•vl ,unnr ,.f nwrl lnr Into ,11r a. h•r 1a1, lull lh, 6n rr vrrl inn of pn.rl ln.• Arrmn• ' Rnnc�sttrr Avrnur Lo W DE"51TY LOW J DeNt ?7Y 4 FG �] %AO i 1 CIIQOL A LIEQNATIV E 3- 0 0 _3 VERY LOW OMSITY FMI13tr a ■2 rxl.ILlt„ ...R,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,, GENERAL . t 1 a rn •Iv r••ur . n r r•. or t iva.rh At•Mx.n nnl R.. Ilo, .h.•un In l.. ••nr .raft Hal no.r tln• h.l. rxrrl inn nr Gtvol Inr u,1 it 1.,.... .%, en . 7t.. ....I., lal .... IJ,. •...tiv. at PLAN n.rn.•r .( Ilirhl u.J ux. 111., 110 A . . or. Lion or gl.l wd -11-1 .,l f I Ixa.xln Monura Iv n 1... nl r.l lc. I lu• 11l lnt. rvec- k WINDROW II WINDROW , < al 0 F s w1moRow VERY LOW fhRX DEN51TY WINDROW VERY I Lo tit ceu"ITy WlNrrx%v [ALT 5CHOOl. WINDROW WINDROW WIND9oW , r / . WINDROW WINDROW • WINDROW EXH� y = 0 0 GENERAL PLAN loco'' J �ow _ �.. , ---S1 t 3 MBDt"m tA.EOIVM DENS5ITrr Y -( EXHIBIT 2 • ORDINANCE NO. 92 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE CASA DE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO WINERY AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY AND THER&ORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION is The City Council finds and determines that the following t•�tures of the City have met the criteria established by Ordinance No 70 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these Features as Historic Landmarks of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. Casa de Rancho Cucamonga 2 Cucamonga Rancho Winery SECTION 2: The Mayor shall slgn this Ordinance and the City Clerk s�ia latest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation • published in t�C ti y of Ontariu, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of_, 1979 AYES: NOES ABSENT: ATTEST City Clerk -3jj Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 93 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE GARCIA RANCH HOUSE, SYCAMORE INN, THE CUCAMONGA CHINATOWN SITE, THE COUSINS HDUSE, THE MILLIKEN RANCH, AND THE TAPIA ADOBE SITE AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINTS OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST. The City Council of the City of Rarr_ho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION '.: The City Council finds and determines that the following eat tunes of the city tave met the criteria established by Ordinance No. 7D-B for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and with the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates these features as Historic Points of Interest of the City of Ran:ho - Cucamonga a. Garcia Ranch House b. Sycamore Inn (Uncle Billy's Tavern) C. The Cucamonga Chinatown Site d The Cousins House (known as the Christmas House) e Milliken Ranch t. Tapia Adobe Site SECTION 2. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk s—R5TT attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The _D_aily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the C ti y of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancto Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of__, 1979. AYES: NO'S ABSENT: © yor ATTEST: City Clerk HERORAN0UN Date: December 12, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager From: B11, Holley, Directot, Community Services Subject: Request of Historic Preservation Commission for designation of the Alta Loma Railway Station site as a Point of Historic Interest. The Historic Preservation Coe:sissfon held a public hearing on Hovcober 1S, 1979, regarding the designation of the Alta Loma Railway Station as a Historic landmark of the City. After such discussion, it was unanimously determined that the Landmark designation was not feasible for various technical reasons not related to it's historical significanct. However, the Commission by unanimous voti, did wish to recommend to Council a designation as a Point of Historic Interest The attached documents attest to the historic merit of the Statio.t, which among other thingsbrought "Alta Loma" into existence. ' • St..ff Comment: While the building will shortly be rated by the Southern Pati 11—raad, the significance of what occurred at the site is very no:evorthy The dcsignatlen of Point of Historic Interest to the site will have no financial impa.t to the City Commission Recommendation: That Council recogniz as authorized by Ordinance 70 -B. tho Alta Loaf Railway Site as a Point of Historic .merest to the City of Rancho Cucwtonga Request. agenda date of December 19 for Council action. BH/mv K17 I HISTORIC LANOMPRIC Cosh — a ion •IDE ;T IF GAT 10 19 1 -off== name Alta tona Pacific Electric Railway Station 2 Historic name, if known! Smo 3 Street or rural address. 7188 Amethyst Street City Rancho Cucamonga ZIP: 91701 _ Coenty: SO Assessor's parcel no. 207.091 -37 _ 2on0. Legal description: " Southern Pacific 4 Present owner, if known: Transportation Cc Address: 610 S. Main St. City: Los Angeles jip..90014 Ownership 1s: public vv S. Present Use:_ Not being used Original Use: Railroad Station Other past uses: None DESCRIPTION 6. Briefly describe the present h sleet a ar22ce of the site or structure and describe any major alterations ram is or gins condition: This one -story building is concrete with stucco facing It had a flat roof, but the roof is now gene and the sheathing boards are exposed It has a concrete floor. !9 11 entrance doors and windows have all been destroyed. The plastered ceilings are missing The plumbing fixtures and pipes have all been removed. It is a shell of a building with only the inside wall partitions remaining 7. Locational sketch map (draw and label site and surrounding streets, roads, and prominent landmarks): •• Refer to Assessors Map Book 202 Page 09 Revised 7/3/74 Attached Location Nap B. Approximate property size: Lot size (in •eet) 14 Frontage gulldi site Depth 27' z 140' or approx. acreage 9. Condition: (check one) a. Excellent_ b. Good_ c. Fair d. Deteriorated xmc e. No longer in existance_ 10. Is the feawre a. Altered7,__ b. Unaltered? xs 11, Surrounding:. (check more than one if necessary) a. Open land_ b. Residential and e Scattered buildings xx d. Densely build -up e Commercial xx f. Industrial xx g. Other 1 12. Threats to site: a. hone known_ b. Private development_ c Zoning_ - _ d. Public Uorks Project_ a Vandalism�xx f. Other Oceoiltion 13 Oates of enclosed photagraph(s) September 1979 t1OTE: The following (Items 14 -19) ire for structures only 14. Pr'mary exterior ?uitdfog mlterial: a. Stone b Brick concrete walls w th -- C. Stucco facing d. Adobe_ a Vood` ? Other IS. is the structure: a. On its original site? as b. Moved? c. Unknewn? 16. Year of initial construction` 1914 This date is: a Factual rx b. Estimated cost: $10,000 Mr. Pillsbury, P E engineer, through Capt Demens, invited R.A. Magner to. make 'a selection of design for 17. Architect (if known).-_ i6e depot from four desUns subbdtted • 18. Builder (if known): Pacific Electric Company 19 Related fe..tures: a. Barn_ b. Carriage house_ c. Outhouse d. Shed(s)_ m Formal garden(s) ref. Windmill g. Watertower /tankhouse L. Other. track, 1, None SIGIIIFICAHCE 2u. Briefly state historical and /or architectural fnportance (include dates, events, and persons associated with the site when known): This building was the first and last railroad station in Alta Loan It is historically significant in that after it's name had been selected by vote, the name of the post office in the community was changed from Ioamosa Post Office to Alta Loma Post Office. Soon thereafter, the name of the school district was changed to Alta Loma. Because of this station, several hundred acres of citrus were set out in Alta Loma and packing houses were build in the town. To celebrate the completion in the station a silver spike was presented to the P E Cc by the citizens of Alta Loma at a crowded ceremony Capt Denens was chatiou 21. Main theme of the historic resource: (check only one): a. Architecture _ b. Arts b Leisure_ C. Economic /Industri•1 xx d Government • e. Exploration /Settlement f. Military _ g. Religion h. Social /Education 22. Sources: List books, documents, surveys, �ersonal intervi¢w5 and their dates. Souvenir Program of Alta to= Silver Jubilee. 6 17/39 Hazel Billings, long time resident of Alta Loma "Alta Loma" 7/22/70 (attached) 23. Date form prepared 9/18/79 By (name). Helen Y.i'murray, Leonard Gorczyca Address. City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 Phone: 987 -3254 Organi zati on Members of Historic Preservation Co ©. City Use Only ,. . 3X " I a 5 �a rt! r � q • is ! � IoaG °ad Assc•' � W aria• • •u is , �— 4.14 o� ONyd Asti j• • .Ib [O • � y - t r • .. M e l :, �n 0.61 el) ! O h 16_�.d r srr,EET —e,— I. J f • .tp ' < l C3 P9 a+ RCVIlFD ! Assessors Mop VAG177 u Note- Assessor's Blk & Lo Book 202 Fbge 09 1/)7/13 R Numbers Shown in CO•cles. Son 'Bernardino County iii %s n ,t•7,�69 Go,} i minutes - October 9, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission Rancho Cucamonga Library 9191 Base Line Road Heating was called to order by Chairman Gorczyca at 7:10 p m. Pledge oe Allegiance was led by Chairman Gorczyca. Present were Commission Members Hickcox, gilmurray. Cooper, White, Gorczyca and Serene. Minutes of September 11 Regular Meeting were reviewed. Notion: Moved and Seconded by Commissioners Hickcox and gilmurray Minutes of September 11, 1979, Regular Meeting, be approved as posted. Motion Carried 6 -0. Announcements Chairman Gorczyca reported on his attendance at the annual "Blessing of the Grapes" held at Guasti Church. During the festival. Chairman Gorczyca made contact with a representative of MNBC television regarding possible television coverage concerning the Founders Day Parade. Staff Report - Mr. Halley reported to Commission on the status of the first annual Founders Day Parade, to be held on November 10. Staff requested Agenda 'ten 6-G be discussed first during Commission Items. Commission Items. 6 -G. Jerry Grant, City Building Official, was present to discuss with Commission the feasibility of restoration attempts concerning the Alta Lots Railway Station. Me Grant reported on severe damage to interior walls, the roof has deteriorated into a nor. - existant state, all plumbing fixtures have been ruined, graffiti is apparent on entire interior and exterior of building, the building has been Iued as a dumping site for all types of debris Hr. Grant reported a "Notice and Order to Abate a Public Nuisance" was directed to Southern Pacific Land Company, owner of the property, by the City In January, 1979 Disucssion followed with Commission Members raising :ho following points of interest: - As of this date, no public interest has been shown toward preserving this site. Press releases were sent to area newspapers requesting public input concerning preservation of railway station. No public comments have been received. - The community name of Alta Loma was derived from the railway depot. - The Etiwanda railway station is of the same a- .ni•ectural design and construction, and is in such better repair It would require much less in restoration efforts. - There arc many other possible designations for historic landmarks within the City that have more historical signiticanee. Further, the costs of a public hearing must be paid by the tax payers, who have shown no interest in preservation of this site. - Tito cost would be very great concerning restoration expenses, and at this time, no funding possibilities have been found -1 -31X1 L J A Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Minutes 9/11/79 "Blessing of Grapes" Founders Day Para* Alta loaDRailway Station El 11 Historic Preservation Commission Minutes - 10/9/79 page 2 Chairman Gorczyca declared that a Commission decision to hold a public hearing should be based only on information received from guidelines sat forth in Landmarks Designation Review Workshoet, and that funding possibilities need not be dealt with at this time. Chairman Gorczyea polled Commission Members on their views of review criteria contained in Worksheet, after which he recommended a public hearing be held regarding the site. Motion: Moved by Strane. Seconded by Kilmumy that as certain criteria for landmark designation for Alta Loma Railway Station has been met, a public hearing be held for determination as to whether the site should be considered as an historic landmark, and so recommended to City Council. Discussion followed. Motion Amended with the approval of Strane and Kilmurray, to include date for public hearing be set for November 13, 1979, at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting, to be held at Rancho Cucamonga Library. Motion Carried as Amended by a vote of S -1. (NOES: Cooper) G -A. Staff Report - Ordinance i0 is still being reviewed Ordinance 70 • by State. Some question has arisen over tax reform laws being available for use as they pertain to historic districts Ordinance 70 does not have provision for districts. 6 -8. Staff Report - Letters of inquiry were sent, by direction Chaffey- Garcia House of Commission, to Etiwanda Congregational Church, Etiwanda School District, Chaffey Union High School District and Southern California Edison Co. These groups had been contacted concerning their cooperation in the possible preservation efforts of the Chaffey- Garcia House. The Commission had requested the use of land owned by these agencies so the House could be re- located there Negative responses were received from both school districts No response yet from Edison The Etlwanda Church is in the process of considering the request. 6 -C Discussion was held on press releases sent out to area Press Releases newspapers concerning Alta Loma Train Station and the list of eight previously designated sites. No public comment was received regarding those newspaper articles. 6 -D Founders Day Pattie - discussed previously under Announcements section of agenda Comissionors Cooper and Hickeox expressed Founders Day Parade interest that the parade be filmed. 6 -E Commission members gave status reports on Sycamore Inn, • Chinatown and the Cousins' (Christmas) House These three entities are to be include' in the group of 8 previously designated historic sites be submitted to City Council for formal recognition 6 -F Commissioner Hickcox reported on pending accession applications. 6 -G. Alta Loma Railway Station - previously discussed 6 -I1 Commission discussed the possibility of selecting sites from the Preliminary Historical Sites Inventory and processing them under previsions of Historic Point of Interest criteria Chairman Gorczyca adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p m Next meeting - 11/13/79, 7:00 p.m., Rancho Cucamonga Library. Respectfully submitted by: "� Mary Whit Designated Sites Adjournment Minutes Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission November 13, 1979 Rancho Cucamonga Library 9191 Base Lino Road Heating was called to order by Chairman Gorczyca at 7 :07 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chairman Gorezyca Present were Conalssioners Kilmurray, Hickeoa, Gorezyma, Strane and Billings Absent: Cooper and White Minutes of 10/9/79 Regular Nesting wero raviewed Motion: Moved by Kilmurray, Seconded by Strane that Minutes of September 9, Regular Meeting be approved as posted Motion carried S -0. (Absent: Cooper and White ) Announceaents Chairman Gorczyca introduced new Commission Member, Gene Billings. Mr Billings was selected by City Council to fill the vacancy left by Art Bridge. Chairman Corczyca announced that Commissioner Cooper was the recipient of the "Woman of Achievement Award" and that he received the "Ibnary Award for Casa de Rancho Cucamonga Society" Public Hearing Nation: Moved by Strome, seconded by Kilmurray, that the Alta Loma Railway Station be considered for recomendatioa for Historical Landmark Designation. Chairman Gorezyca opened the hearing for public comment. George Blanchard, representing Cucamonga County Water District reported that the land the train depot is located on is an easement given to the railroad company by the Water District. The terms of the deed required that when the station was no longer used for passenger service, the easement would revert back to the Water District, thus making thw the sole owner. Commissioner hhite joined the meeting, in progress, at 7:20 p.m. Staff Coements - Bill Holley reported on his conversation with Southern Pacific Transportation Company representative, Jeffrey Reynolds Me Re/nolds stated that as par. instruction for City Building and Safety Division, contract foi demolition of depot has already been awarded While Southern Pacific has no objection to the City attempting to bestow landmark designation on the depot, they do not want the building to remain on their property, and cannot stop demolition pr^ceedings; therefore, in order to save the station. It would have to be moved from the site. City Building Official, Jerry Grant, stated his opinion that attempting to move the station is not feasible because of its construction type. Councilman Jon Mikels asked if there were any other options If Southern Pacific will not allow it to stand on the property and it can't be moved Commission and staff agreed that there seemed to be none. Gary Howard, recent area resident, reported he would like to see the station saved A letter from Bob Lamb, long time area resident, was received and stated that he believed the building should be torn down as there wore no funds to restore or maintain it, and its present condition makes it an attractive nuisance r1 LJ Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Minutes New Commissioner Gene Billings Alts Loma Railway Station 5 Commissioner White joins meeting 0 Commissioner Strane submitted reports of Acknowledged Historic Landmarks to be submitted to City Council for formal recognition at their November 21 meeting The eight sites are: 1. Thomas Vineyard 2. Garcia Hausa S. Cousins House 4. Chinatown S. Rains' House 6. Sycamore Inn 7. Tapia Adobe 8 Miliken House Election Election of Chairman and Vice Chaima Chairman Gorczyca passed out secret ballots to Commission members to recorf their vote for Chairman 8nd Vice • Chairman Ballots were counted by staff Newly elected Chairman - Leonard Gomzyca. Vice Chairman- Helen Kilmurray Chairman Gorczyca presented pictures of Rancho Cucamonga's Founders Day Parade first Founders Day Parade for processing into accession system. Chairman Corczyea adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Adjournment Next meeting: December 11 at Lion's Park Community Center Submitted by: Hary hhitney. Secretaz Community Services - - -2 - -4L/ - - - Hinutes - page 2 11/13/79 R.C. Historic Preservation Commission Is Commission discussion followed with the following commen-s: - almost no visable public interest shown in preserving station even though vide spread newspaper publication concerning station has been evident - Restoration / preservstion efforts seen futile as aepot cannot remain on existing property and cannot be moved. Commissioner Hickcox requested a veto an the motion. Motion was repeated for the benefit of Commissioner hmte. Motion denied 6 -0 by the following vote: AYES: none. NOES: Hickcox, Kileurray, Strane, White, Billings and Gorczyca ABSENT: Cooper. Motion: Moved by Hickcox, seconded by Billings that Point of Historic Alta Loma Railway Station be submitted to City Council Interest for designation as a "point of historical interest" Motion carried 6.0. (ABSENT: Cooper) Commissioner White reported that the status of the Garcia House. Garcia House is not sure at this time. The Etiwanda Church is still inquiring about legal title and the feasibility of the house being moved. Commissioner Hickcox reported on the status of accession Accession system. He further stated that Commission should draft a letter to be used for acceptance of donated Stets. Commissioner Strane submitted reports of Acknowledged Historic Landmarks to be submitted to City Council for formal recognition at their November 21 meeting The eight sites are: 1. Thomas Vineyard 2. Garcia Hausa S. Cousins House 4. Chinatown S. Rains' House 6. Sycamore Inn 7. Tapia Adobe 8 Miliken House Election Election of Chairman and Vice Chaima Chairman Gorczyca passed out secret ballots to Commission members to recorf their vote for Chairman 8nd Vice • Chairman Ballots were counted by staff Newly elected Chairman - Leonard Gomzyca. Vice Chairman- Helen Kilmurray Chairman Gorczyca presented pictures of Rancho Cucamonga's Founders Day Parade first Founders Day Parade for processing into accession system. Chairman Corczyea adjourned the meeting at 8:20 p.m. Adjournment Next meeting: December 11 at Lion's Park Community Center Submitted by: Hary hhitney. Secretaz Community Services - - -2 - -4L/ - - - t� 1 sea a•1 V3-� *s •+�3sp g °�3S °5� = Ml g• ��-� S a � a 5 33 s n c e�a:a AM R 8701 yY wi it JZ 1 4.f.4 4c cr 'h"/ "1 a "CL- co W rl z 3 3 G & In � = �3iCA - 71 a .SA- =e! ¢� nvoa3: aOdSaw.:dd 414 � p ry Y•g $q•S L�:¢,L1 S +� a�i c9 t7 CGCC sf�id �•+w aF3 '��.7 �'i'��L �( R 0 o N °a ��C�3 .fd�32�i5 °� ^��5 �9 �'�� rev •C a w F a ti � �S5 ,! r��a "Lo'�'�9G��,�$•�� }Gr 9�G� y^ ���r ��Fii� b V y ••99�$ �CC °..�4� G� �--'Za $y9 C9S !•� ri.7 -• F r A .: L- ,93 @s �la . .1111 .g� 339• pp s Y ° Ee gg 0 ��3 O' y g w Cg�GG�:t�i 2 d�•s�`�YS`.g4 pp sE ^� 3 d F6 9 �g 4 ��- a3gF 83: G Q sg-�:! ZA YS r- Ski �s9x9:fjp23eEG 0 0 0 0 0 0 �# pea a All :'a3 It $m JA 4 '3w�s 4 t 9W a° H HRx fi sl QEQO D+ a G CCCyy °lye Neil 1 raia33�: tI I E`6yi a 66adi:YJ_IL 3 8e3� L e � 3 a � •a1sa�9a 5��� c.�'�`3�s2 ��3� ( � �+ o 89`z ; .c � st: &ya�4 a me C�.bF36� 57��8 .= r3529�z° 3:8 s _ r- �= +yp 88 yp ® t WpQ g�t�. all 5 °= g :a FCC ON -Z F < < a 0 G`m 'C r <f �r U•� W � i jai ag�s�98a••► .: � Q�E�e�yq•.� C ;`d� �� �i o qg� -O p Ems ° s= F� e° O � F O m° ry s6 AJ- e d �g s C �• � . c L 9 C F � o G � c C k O °c C q c V a ti 0 0 0 C ° q 3 a d '< s y � p ag�s�98a••► .: � Q�E�e�yq•.� C ;`d� �� �i o qg� -O p Ems ° s= F� e° O � F O m° ry s6 AJ- e d �g s C �• � . c L 9 C F � o G � c C k O °c C q c V a ti 0 0 0 41 0 4 • i Ali =31a � $drdiad Yd �d9dt��i�85LM 23 xE q 2g yy 3daR6tnz..3t�..S�aa3 E � d E Sds< ' <��aC �ddAbE3bBe z e •: z,..�.��y E�Eae na=dS2� aai z I dzs d = a gs o8r ° p npL < + W � Z~ �w w d °n m o� �w cf°•. zw 0 �y Cz: y2 Y Xj.9 .g a4y: Nis 6. 1 F " o w o w Z w Z " � dr a 2 3aY 3 i�IG n s> a pz e ES cis ° p npL < + W � Z~ �w w d °n m o� �w cf°•. zw 0 �y Cz: y2 Y Xj.9 .g a4y: Nis 1ol n5 r 1 a h .l = 2 q o �gaf�o� h rj, E fF$ C ='d- A n a Li r. z 3 1 w w � dr a yAA R d i�IG n p e ES cis -1 3 ° j. M9 - 1ol n5 r 1 a h .l = 2 q o �gaf�o� h rj, E fF$ C ='d- A n a Li r. z c S� ORDINANCE NO. 95 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE ALTA LONA RAIL- WAY STATION SITE AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND T"EREFORE DESIGNATES IT AS A CiTY POINT OF H'MRIC INTEREST The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines that the Alta Loma Ila! —iway Station Site has met the criteria established by Ordinance No 70 -8 for Historic Preservation, and therefore, and w::h the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission, designates the Alta Loma Railway Station Site as a Historic Point of Interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: The Hayor shall sign this Ordlnance and the City Clerk shat T—attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The DD iill RReM2r -t, a newspaper of general circulation published I the CT —y Mario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho • Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979 AYES: 0 ATTEST NOES ABSENT: City Clerk V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • DATE: December 19. 1979 HEXORA' '--1H TO: City Council L City Manager FRCeI: Lloyd Hubbs. city Engineer Susnm VACATION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR ALDER. STREET The public hearing for the above street vocation It to be held this evening Please refer to the attached memo regarding the need for this action No objection to the proposed vacation has been received nor any is expected to be presented at the hearing. It is recomcended that the City Ccuncil approve the attached resolution order- :ng the vacation of the offer of dedication for Alder Street. Respectfully sutmitted. Lloyd B Hubbs City Engineer LBH: deb 0 Wi� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 21, 1979 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of Offer of Dedication for 'Alder Street• The attached letter and oup rfor to a request by Mr. Ronald Spiers to abandon an Offer of Dediuticn for a street on the south side of his property The proposed street alignment was abandoned and other Offers of Dedication vacated previously by San Bernardino County This request originated when Mr. spiers applied for a building permit for a garage to be constructed at the rear of his property on the existing Offer of Dedication. According to City Ordinance /SB -A the construction of a garage does not require the dedication of right -of -way or the con- struction of street improvements, so no new didicaitans can be required is of Mr. Spiers. The existirg Offer of Dedication has been completely superseded and is worthless to the City. RECO141EIIDATION: It is reco.n ended that the attached Resolution of Intent to vacate this Offer of Dedication be approved, setting a public hearing for the December 5, 1979 City Council meeting. Reessp�ectfullyy ct submli t, &ed Lloyd Hu6bs City Engineer LH:cd Attachment 11 (�9 n RESOLUTInN NO. 79-93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, LECLARING ITS INTENTION' TO VACATE A PnRTION OF ALDER STREET. AN OFFER OF DEDICATION, AS SHOWN 04 MAP NO. V -005 FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to preened under Section 8300, at seq. of the Streets and Hi3hvaya Code, also known as th. Street Vacation Act of 1941. SEC -.04 2: That the City Council hereby declares its Intention to vacate a portion of Alder Street, an offer of dedication, as ahovn on Hap No. V -005 on file in the Office of the City Clerk, a legal description of which In attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 19th day of December, 1979, at 7:00 p.m., in the Lion's Park Community Center, located at 9161 Baseline, Rancho, Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation for the purpose of its dcterming whether said offer of dedication is necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SbCTION 4: That the City Engineer shalt cause notices to be potted conspicuously in the vicinity of the offer of dedication proposed to be vacated at least 10 days before the hearing, not less than three signs shall be posted, each of wLIch shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering 8 not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF NEARING TO VACATE STREET." SECTION 5: The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities vt retard. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 1979 AYES: Schlosser, Hri�kkeells, Palumbo, Bridge, Frost ._..- _. -�..._ _dOES: None -- . vd Resolution No 79 -93 Page 2 LEGAL OESCRIPTION FOR VACATION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION KNOWN AS ALDER STREET (DNDLVELOPED) That certain protion of Parcel NO. 2 of Parcel Hap No. 834 In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino. State of California as per eyp filed in Book 8 Page 54 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County shown as an Offer of Dedication For Future Streets" as per Document filed in Book 7989 Page 1038 of Official Records of said County to be knoun as Alder Street (30 feet vide) V 0 • RESOLUTION NO 79 -109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ORD -c INGTOCBENVACATED,A PORTIONIIOF ALDER STREETT.FONRN NIA, INFTHECOFFICE DEDICATION 0 PTHEOCM OF) FILE RANCHO CUCAMONGA. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 79 -93, passed on November 21, 1979, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to varate a portion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.m. on December 19, 1979, in the City Chambers of said City as the time and place for hearing all person objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and place, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation; BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECT'LAN 1. The Council hereby finds from all the eviden• prospective publicostreet purposes. and the City for ro its rider vacating that portion of said City -treet as shown on Mp No V -,)OS on file in the office of the Clerk of City of Rancho Cucamonga, which has been further described in a legal description which is attached nereto, marked Exhibit °A', and by reference made a part SECTION 2: There are no reservations or exceptions necessary SECTION 3: The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to Ee recorded in the office of the County Rmorder of San Be•nardino County, California PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTEC this day of ;979 ATTEST , LA AYES NOES ABSENT L ty er /z mayor Resolution No 79 -109 Page 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR VACATION OF OFFER OF DEDICATION • KNOWN AS ALDER STREET (UNDEVELOPED) That certain portion of Parcel Plo. 2 of Parcel Map No. 834 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Giunty of Son Bernardino, State of California as per map filed in Book 8, Page 54 of Parcel Naps in the office of the County Recorder of said County shown as an 'Offer of Dedication For Future Streets" as per Document filed in Book 7949, Page 1038 of Official Records of said County to be known as Alder Street (30 feet wide) • s W, .CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA i MMRAFIDUM r1 DATE: Dacomber 19, 1979 PD: City Council and City Manager PRAY: Jack lam, Director of Community Development SUDJECr: CW1DOMINMN WNVERSIONS Increasing interest to convert rental units to ownership units has prompted the C-ty to address the issue of condominium conversions Interest in converting has resulted from many factors including expanding rant control lave, difficulty in obtaining loans for apartment projects, and the potential profits to be Bade frog such conversions. Many cities in California have adopted regulations and development standards for condminiuc conversions to offset this inordinate demand. Proser.Cly, Rancho Cucamonga has no ordinance governing condominium conversions and, hence, the Planning Comntssion has instructed staff to proceed with the development of such an ordinance To acemrplish this task, the Commission is recommending a *freeze" on condominium conversions until such time as a comprehensive ordinance is adopted. Because of the existing residential moratorium, no applications have been submitted for condo - conversions, however, the slau:ing Division has received preliminary regiasts for such conversions from several developers The City's concern would not be so great if the community had an abundance of rental units, however, only 1,438 units exist in the City of which an extremly low number are vacant. Apartments are the most affordabla living units to the general population and conversion of these units can create a detrimental social impact on the community Issues that must be addressed include, but are not limited to, relocation of existing tenants to other affordable housing units, options for purchasing units by the tenant, relocation of elderly tenants and maintenance of an adequate rental stock, adequate standards for conversion, appropriate C C a R's, and appropriate upgrade of units to torten: development standards Beyond the social impacts created by condo- converwims, the Planning Commission is eoncorned with development standards for such units Ownership creates different expectations tarn renting in terms of living space, storage space, amenities, etc As part of the development of a cmprehansivo condominium conversion ordinance, these issues would be addressed Enclosed for your review is a work program for the developo -nt of a condominium conversion ordinance As part of the work program, the planning Division has contacted several groups and organizatirls lncleiing the Duilding Industry Associa- tion, Chamber of Commerce, and Board of Realtors to Provido input into the process of developing an ordinance To date, two meetings hove been hold and valuable information has been obtlined. Staff will continue to work closely with the groups in the formulation of the ordinance Sy RELVV MATIDNt It L retcaoanded that the City Council concur with the racommende- tion of CAo Planning Camission to adopt an ordinance placing a freers ten coM minlam, • eonvereiotm end Proceed with the work Program as described herein. PAS cttull cuhmittedt . Director Ccmunity Development JLtcc Attachment: COMOminitm Conversion Work Program • J TASK 1, INMAL nEVi11i AND PRELIMINARY PUBLIC - M (NOVemer) Subtasks, 1 (aI Initial Survey and Rnso, dh - The first subtask will be a survey of those clues that have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, a condominium ordinance. We will obtain a copy of each City, ordinanca and review it for its applicability to Rancho Cucamonga. The type tm minformation s ad �ni� s "carryurates• cost of housing, pressures supply of convert, zoning howing, pressures to convert, zoning teW,iquea, conversion requi.- emote, and performance standards. The inteat of thin subtask will be to find innovative techniques and standards that have been successfully applied by other cities, and also, to recognisa and hopefully avcrd the pitfalls encountered by many cities. 1(b). Initial ReggnAlssMta of Rmcho Cucamonga - Ms will survey the existing apart- monts sad condominium in the City to derive number of units, vacancy rate. persons per acre, units per acre, rental rates, parking standards, and other applicable information to got a handle on the existing mike up of the City. The intent is to determine existing condition-' and future needs that can by addressed by a Condominium conversion Ordinance. 1(g). Initial Public InE" - This aubtask is directly related to subtask 1(b) in • that we will meat and obtain prelimLauy information and 'deal from the Building Industry Association, Chamber of Commerce. apartment owners and other interested groups and individuals to help guide tuo initial phases of the program. The intent of this subtask is twofold, 1) to ohcain prellninarY information and guidance, and 2) to establish a healthy and prod,Ative working relationship with those groups. Products, 1) Momo to the Planning Commission and City Council summarizing the results of our research and initial meetings. 1(d). Refine Mork Progcam - information obtained through subtasks 1(a) through 1(c) will allow on to establish a morn realistic, detailed wrk program. At this time, staff will be able to establish meeting dates to ensure completion of the program by April 19, 1980. Products, 1) Refined Work Program. TASK 2, PREPARATION Op DRAFT CONDOMINIUM cOWERSION ORDINANCE (Decemter - Jenuary) SubtaSYS, 2(a).Pre mra Draft Ordinance - Based on the research and information obtained in Task F- ,e will prepare the first draft of the Condominium Cmveraiou Ordinance for review by the Planning Casmissicn. As a "first cut* document, as will expect extensive input and guidanco from the Planning Caaaission. The in %ant of this subtask is to allow early review by the Planning remission to ensure we ass heading in the right direction. ® Products, 1) Draft Ordinance )5'� -2- 2(b). Public Input - we will arrange mating@ with special interest groups to 'fine tuna- the ordinance. The intent of this subtask L to receive input and to clarify the cajor issues. 2(c). Revisvd Draft Ordinance - Based on subtask 2(a) and 2(b). staff will prepare a revised draft ordinance. This draft would be distributed to the Planning Commission and City Council for public hearing. t Products. 1) Revised Draft Ordinance. TASK 1t PUBLIC HEARINGS (February - April) Svbtaskut 1(a). Planning Commission Public Rearing - Iwo meetings will be set for considera- tion oC the documents February 13 and February 27. Productrt 1) Rasolotlon reconending apprvral to the City Council 1(b). City Council Public Hearing - Two meetings will be gat for eonsidaration, of the ordinances March 5 and March 19. The intent is to have fist reading on tho ordinance On March 5, second reading on Marro 19, 1980 and the effective date of April 19, 1980. Ptwductat 1) Candominina tanvnrsion Ordinance 0 • We C: l J Ll M E H O R A N D O H TO: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager PROH: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: December 11, 1979 RE: Moratorium Ordinance - Conversion of Existing Residential Real Property Into Condominiums, Community Apartments or Stock Cooperatives. Enclosed please find tha Condominium Moratorium Ordinance which I have reviewed and revised at the request of the Community Development Department. Bill Hofman stated that this matter will be presented to the City Council on December 19th. the Community Development Department should note Govern- ment Code Suction 66427.2 and should insure that the City is in compliance therewith prior to the adoption of any permanent Ordi- nance regulating condominium conversions. RED:sgg Enclosure ORDINANCE NO. 97 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE PILING OF TENTATIVE MAPS FOR THE PURPOSE OF • COUVERTING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY INTO CONDOMINILMS, COMUNITY APARTMENTS OR STOCK COOPERATIVES, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali- fornia, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and declares that: (a) The City has a shortage of apartment rental units and affordable housing stock; (b) An adequate supply of apartment rental units and affordable housing stock in the City is in the best interests of the public health, safety and welfare; (c) Conversion of existing apartment rental_ :wits to condominium projects, community apartment projects or stock cooperative projects may, under the circumstances, be det- rimental to the public health, safety and welfar and, (d) N moratorium on the conversion of exist - ing apartment rental units to condominiums, community apartments, and stock cooperatives is necessary to insure that apartment rent- al units and affordable housing stock in the City are not depleted during the time that is necessary for the study and preparation of a comprehensive ordinance for the regulation of this subject matter. SECTION 2: No tentative map for a subdivision to be created rrom Me conversion of residential real property into a condominium project, a community apartment project or a stock cooperative project shall be accepted by the City for filing or processing. SECTION 3: The moratorium imposed by this Ordinance shall expire Apr Y 30, 1980. SECTION d: The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted d this ordinance and each section, sub- section, sen- tence, clause, phrase or word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub- sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or words thereof may be declared invalid or unconstitu- tional. If for at., reason any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared invalid or unconstitutional, all other provisions there- of shall remain valid and enforceable. SECTION 5: This Ordinance is hereby declared an urgency measure necessary for the immediate protection and preservation of the public peace, health, safety and welfare for the reasons stated in Section 1 hereof and it shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Ty//.,� SECTION 6: The Mayor s,halYign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the aame to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at leapt once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation, published n a Cit�Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 1979. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk is 40 CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE. December 19, 1979 TO, City Council and City Manager PRM Jack Lax, Director of Co®unity Deveiopmout SUF.T=, PARR MM ORDINANM - REVISION TO ORDINANCE NO. 8, SECTIOA 7 OF THE PARR TAX ME ORDINANCE park ABSTRACT. AS the City Couaoil will recall, them vas much deliberation ware a were tax credit that wool given for Doer Creek Development OOMP=y in several questions on the Iatnnt of the ordinance relative to park tax Credit being given On certain types of recreational facilities provided Doe Crsek development- given ddlzvctsd Therefore, City Council. after granting Parts staff to prepare items for clarification of this Ordinanco. Therefore, staff has - presented recommendations for changes in Ordb+ ICO I" 8 to the planningeC -49BLM It was rOCacmanded that Section 7 of Ordinanco No. 8, dealing with Pazti be deleted in its entirety. Attached is a Copy of Ordinance No' 8 indicating the recocmanded section to be deleted. The Planning Commission, at its meeting of December 12, 1979, recfdended that the city Council amend ordinance No. 8 deleting Section 7 in its antiratY• Thies a Pink and RoocroatLon Element the and basis thathat ata is needed General dd so that new ordinaneoeean�4 be written to conform with eelimination off5thatele element. Therefore, in the interim. the Commission has sugg o It is the City's Intent that upon adoption of the Parks and Recreation Element that ordinance No. 8 would be revised in its entirety to be Consistent with the standards and policies as out forth in the new alemcnt. RL.MOWDATION, The Planning Oommfssio• mcommands that the City Council adopt the attached Ordinance which alininstas Section 7 of Ordinance No. 8. Poe ctfully s ttd, 16/a ox'8 —' Community Davelopmnt JLtMV.CC Attachmanta. Ordinance No. 8 ® New Adopted Ordinance W 1 • nrDINANCC NO. 9 AN nRn1NANCr OF TIIF CITf COUNCIL OI Tir CITY Ol' I:ANL11" (711CNIntiGh i'STNULISIMIC T. PAIIK run PCCRU,'l'I0N TAx ron NCN '.EsiurtlTIAT DLVEL)PNENT AND pnovim c ron Tl:l AntIINTS': NT'1'ION, P "014ITS T•ti- crl'O1TS rurr, COr, nr,'Ei LIN•, ti'•'I DI:Rthrp IllO Cot my OP6IIIA1'CE tin. 21 'G, TPD Of.CL.PINr TIIE 1111CI.IICY 'V111:141:M' El .111: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAIONGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLL(MISt SFCTIOS 1. Intent and Turpose. The City Council o` the City of Rancl'o Cucamonna hereby declares i tax op all now residential devclortnent within the City for the sole nurpose of ptodurino revenue for the - acquisition, dovelopment and irit'.,I 0kunment of net; narks or adatiianal parl. lands. This is ?eetared nursuailt to the taxinq rower granted to the City o nani lo, Cu; imnr.ga by t1to rovernment Cod, of 1.110 State of Ca ifornta The puroose of the tax is to assist in financing the Dlanaing, acquisition and dcveluoment of uar).3 to maintain the level of narl. service as Lhe City's oinulat.ot incre.tses SCCTIOV 2. Definitions a "City" snail mean tie tlty of Rancho Cuc-imengn. u. "Resi,lential Develcomen." shall Include all duelling units onustru, vd for the fitst time on ouch land or whun existing stru0tut -vs are remodeled, addrd to or otherwise alterod to ulc10a11e Lbu cumber of 1w011i3111 •lnitn c "Dwellinq Unit" ch 11 include each single family dwelling. each unit of an anarlmm , duulex dwelling arouo or multiple dwelling structure or co.,dom:,.tum or olanned residential develnunent as a separate habitat for ono or more persons or cic:i mobile homo "pa;e .leai,pi.d tn - on.ain a no) i lc home trailer oil a .:emi- porntanrnt or p.rranent Iwsts. d "Porsnn" includes every oerson, firm or corporation constructing a duelling unit directly or through the services of any unployce, agont or uideoendent contraatwr. 62— C SECTION 3. Tax: Imposition and AoDlication. • A tar is hereby imposed in the amounts herein s Forth and shall be eoolicnbla to every dwelling unit 03 atoll de Elned constructed in the Citv after the effective date of this iadlnanco and s11i11 be 1.3101411 as 1110 P..114 an.l Rocrantion this SU"MON 4. Tax: Amount. Every oarson ennstruetinq any cl%'Pllinq unit within the City eC Cucamonga shall nay the City the folloi..nq: For each single family dwolliliq unit, the film of $300.00 For each multiple dwelling unit, tLe sum of Por each mobile dome unit $180.00 $150.00 SECTION 5 Tax.- {•hen Pa ay ble The tax imposed in this chapter shall be due and Payable upon issuanc0 Ly the City of a building n.•rmit for the construction of any dwellinq unit and 511,111 Lo refunded only in taw avmlt that th0 bull-4119 permit 1ssu0.1 hai expired and no construction has been commenced. SCCI ION G. Dian0sition of Tax Receipts, i There is hereby established a Par]: Develconent PLni. All sums collocte.l pursunn. to this ellaot0r rhall be deno.3J •a In sn ill Park Doveloummll Fund and shall Lu us0d solely for acquisition, d0vc L >wn011t and 111iti31 equinmont of net: Parks cr th0 expinsion of land or servicos on 0-1:1stinq Parks in accordance with thn Pnrk, Pa U'ay and o0c" Swce elemont L` the Rancho Cu;amnngn Gancral Plan. SFCi- S9ii- .7- ,^i4xl4 �t. �"' °4rar- perd�� z.°DTt'axcas;-artback :Z�x>!.."t +•wig _ 'si Z7id"trtircr t- ion -rrt"- snclr -Prrrt t��run"'s�ar. c7 -ZTrtt i••.•• 1��- ncTNLSlLLl "111d.i"M7ttCn3itCC�Trf'• • tilia "oPen'n7ree"trztTCtln:tti tc'Trri7O1VCd"CnY'"h. Auio.W�wir- aw,w.i+, ,Ao �r i' "C. CRri??t'C2'IYLTTff' - wN- llNat- Yteiti+.},97' T-rt.l- �3 • o.- -That use of Is racuiGSGd.- Ew ;- (odPR- ni-• tti- erMTtrmtri- perrnn4t^-- b7-'1a=iTL1d «iVefl+'.rt +itch Tanz rrtl the rartrta tiuncs :_o_'{aceuact {� vul- a+ laicluar, ww- i�- defctitted- �r- r?- !�xrtated uL1P_..at ^hn r ^ ^•.. ^• - i- Lltw- G:kyta+M ,� '"�, tL- Uw. arMaue.(- z�rcvoee- eln- rt- aperec-rs-'rertsemfr2y • rl � n�T�• 1. 1�_ gGL�3har ..jGaMih ?FI.- :NMi- t'e(?YCSTI t+�tt- 2�Ttlt�n7IIC^� -t'.(�rrii.'J Lula�. usul. swLays-.. HCJ�-C• at:,. aia= ai�.'a'tir- +a+aN�-- t•ewr.r+nFw, 9 u�9Yr- .�uo.x;,�r- �MM- 1•..�.i t- tflt�ez -mtel o,�- cVwte -fm -b� it�e- zm,r�s'ed- faP•- tka- axcvt- snaps -aco- La- Sul. etawUaL- aaacaP. i-. w-.+ bFk-( t, a- r> tK SV ;,:t,alta- ..�f�re- Pe,M:.tusaai ��c>rraMt-- o4- t'iK- lkr3tre �e(troE- 34w1,s- At .i- ilw*.at. ani -and Fr-- i4rrt- Clttr- opett- �peee.3�xa7FTyh- oLcad ;L- Lc -q.ucn Is_ a- mbnirnwn- o{— rkn'r- acrrs -. va'it+pt�ccrcC mxt- r,nrr•eeznene�o t- zits - axe- frrr-rr-tr((nal(- mmrosus. BeEem- em4tt- ss -t�zmr - chc- Eity- M�trtgervr -hrs-CesYgn�ctd- YetTYir*- tcwearrve- iMad3-- nnicr- +rr- rt- eemrreetrnderezerrr -to- tine- Erty- 2�at(eii fOP- 4i1E'YS�vftlffY.Ytf is SECTION -6.7 Periodic Revision. • Inasmuch as the tax set forth in this chapter is based on average costs of land and development, a review shall be con- ducted nuri«lically to determine whether the tax needs revisions to reflect current cost, of such acnuiuttiun and devclnonent. SCC'IION Z�9 Eeneal of San Bernardino Countv Ordinance San Bernardino Countf Ordinance No. 21 26, heretofore adopted as in Ot.iinance of .h: Zity of Itancho Cucamonga as re- quired by Section 343 28 5 of the (IOveimtcnt Code of the State of California is hereby exoressly declated roncaled, and is suuer- ceded as an ordinancc of the City of Rancho Cucamon.a by this ordinance SECTION -19 9Thc City of Rancho Cucamonga has just been incorporated yid has no funds uhatsacver to nrovtde for the planning, ..cquisitio•i and deva:onmettt of public uarl.s. It is necessary that the City acquire fwtd•t for such pur-inses without delay. This Ordinance is tht refore necessary for the protection of the public health, welfutu and .Ienetal safety and Vhill tale effect immediately upon its adoption as an urgency ordinance Apnown and AOOPTEM this 2nd day of necetsbnr , 1977. �/ 7 r- • slayer ' thit-ir ty at Pancho Cucamonga t ATTESTf'f / "71;•. (t 1 • ('I ORDINANCE No 8 -A AN ORDINANCE OP TINE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OU RANCHO COCAHONGA. CALIFORNIA. AMM.NG ORDINANCE 8 (ELIMINATING sECTIO:'N 7 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND AtiMING SECTION 8, 9 AND 10) AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHMG A PARR AND RECREATION TAX FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCANONOA. CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS POLL40WSt considered Ordinance 91aand�hes C=jesion at eltimination7OffScet�7 in, its entirety SECTION 3: Section 7 of Ordinance No. 8 of the City at Rancho Cucamcnga, California, is hereby deleted in its entirety. In addition. Ordinance No, 8 Section 8 is amended to mad m section 7, Section 9 is mended to read an Section 8, and Section 10 is amended to read as Section 9. SECTION 3: The Hayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest sa to tnc me, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published Within fifwen (15) days after its Passage, at bast once in of DDailyiRa California, novapaper of general circulation publishol in the City and circulated in the city of Rancho Cueamonga, California. pASSM, AppAMM, and ADOPTED this th day of . 15 AYESs HOES: ABSEHrs ATTEST: City Clerk Hayor �95 CITY OF WcHo CUCAMONGA • MWO MMUM DATE: Oecanbar 19, 1979 TO, City Council and City Nanagor Director of Community Devalopeont YRONt Jack Lam. KENT NO. 79 -OS SOJJECT, NEGATIVE DECLARATION RD ZONING OMINANCE AK—MMM Card rovieva•p� planned COMMunity Developments i nt ��s ABSTRACT, As the City Council will recall, there has been two Together for ties, Terra Vista and VieGOria. Theart O these planned proposed Planned Cemsuni of the City of courunities encompass Over 3.000 idd.th fdevanelopoenenof these Planned Oomuniti°° acres the Staff and commission have developed Rancho provide In o order to gut William and provide for all of the amenities ordinance iam the attached planned Coeunity OrlAwisH The We he" attached has been a Planning by Lyon Company, of their attorney which crontains those lettersand staffs Cmroents� e staff repo issues raised in the letters- the Ordinance " a • At the Planning Commission meeting there were certain changes in The result of the comm by the repcasen�vission meetinglare underlined in the of the changes that occurred at the Plant" attached ordlnaec°. DISCUSSION. The planned Community Ordinance roquirea the alplan O ly a re specific plan which is arory similar to wiet the City has as a general plan only more specific. Further, the Ordinance requites that the developer sutven a planted planned Text which is very similar to the Zoning Ordinance The advantages of n Planned Cocmunity over incremental development of property is that it 'affords tthheiw9h incremental opportunity to provide amenities that might not be p ty ous land, it development. Because of the requirement of 300 acre � is over a large allows t1e dawloper to spread the cost of providing obvious- the City expectations over incremental develop - amount of acreage. The bnnofits to the City are obvious. It will supply with a cocaunity that could far exceed general types of housing end a variety anon. Additional amenities can be provideds V=100 als, that the Planned Comuni of commercial activities It should be noted, rovido a more unique and aesthetic Ordinance may be used in the industrial area to p approach to the assemblage of land and dovelOPment. BECO`1ME MATION: The Planning Commission ,command° that the City Council adopt the attach anee establishing standards and review prceeduros for a Planned Cowwity Dev lopm...— Poe c el � ubm t o I Attach, City 79 staff deport JACy. LA4, Director of `'fjn( City Council POrdlnaneo CTamwity Da"IOPMOnt Initial Study • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. November 28, 1979 TO) Planning Commission FRa4, .lack I=, Director of Community Development SUBJECT, NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE IMENDHENT NO. 19 -05 A4 CITY Or RCH0 mcCA NOA - M ordinance establishing standards and review procedures for Planned Caaeunity Development ABSTRACT, As the Planning Commission will racall, we presented a revrsed ordinance at the November 14t3i meeting At that time, certain changes were made to clarify the intent of the Planned Communit y Ordinance. Since that time, the William Lyon Com p a theia attorney and Lewis Homes have had an opportunity to thoroughly review these changes and how they affeLt the William Lyon Company and Lewis Haws Attached for your information ars 3 correspondence, one from the William Lyon CompanY, one from rulop, Rolston. Burns and Mekittriek, attorneys for the William Lyon Company, and one from Lewis Homes In order to clarify awe of the questions raised in the letters, • we wish to answer each beginning with the correspondence from William Lyon Co. 1. Section 2A -5 - This section is quite long, and not generally normal for an individual district, however. in light of the fact that the City has not adopted a new Zoning ordinance, we feel that it is necessary to describe more fully the purposes of the Zoning ordinance, and specifically the Planned Coarrunity Zone. 2. Section 3A - As you can see from the last exhibit, 'Exhibit A' of the attorney's letter, the William Lyon Company does have contiguous land because under the Section 3A tho Southern California Edison Easerent can be used as a connector as can the Flood Control basin. 3 Section SG - Section SG does not preclude the Commission nor the C7uncil from counting a Victoria Parkway Linear Park toward the dedication requirements for parka ar-d open space This a,s -mMIS t'%"t Victoria Parkway wuuld, in fact, be a usable linear park and not left over space The specific decision as to whether or not Victoria Parkway Linear Park would count towards par). and /or open space requirements would come at the time of the development plan review by the Planning Commission and the City Council We do not concur that internal trails, bikeway, plaza, etc , should count toward tho open space requirements These are amenities provided by the development above and beyond the requirements of the Planned Community Ordinance. In answer to the William Lyon Compan) second question, parkways within the public street right -oC -way are not counted as park lands or open apace. 4 Section SR - We wish to reiterate for the record, the reason we reference the San Bernardino County Coda as adopted by the City is for clarification purposes. It is our intent to amend this section upon adoption of the City's new Zoning Ordinance, which wo hope will provide reasonable parking standards for all areas of the City � 7 5. Section OE - We sea no need for clarification in this section Specifically, if a use within the Planned Community has not been identified an subject to a conditional use permit , it would bo subject to director review as defined in the San Bernardino Cola as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Aancho Cucamonga. 6 Section 6£ and C - Thu entire Section 6 of this Ordinance is a L missiva section It is not a requirement that a developer must meet, only one that ve sugggnt to prospectivo applicants in order to more clearly present their case and to streamline the planning process Specifically Section a and C are talking about general markot analyses based upon todays demands and todays economics we realize that as time changes, demand and economics change, and that the market analyses, whether it be for housing or for commercial, is anyonco best guess at that point in time It is not the City's intent to hold a developer to the plan exactly has he has originally presented it this year or next year or years to come The Planned Community Dovelopmont Plan is the same as the Gereral Plan, It changes with time in order to meet the changing needs of the community 7 Section 7A -2 - There was sore discussion at the last Planning Commission mseting Gf the need in certain Instances of a topographic model of the proposed conceptual grading plan for the development its believe that Section 7A -2 does not really state the intert of the City we suggest that It be revised to road as follow= 'A topographic map and a general gradina cor.cept plan with operrfic sa :tions for sensitive areas as determined by the Grading Committee for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property . 8 £action 7A -5 - The intent of this section is to Show the phasing of the total development plan not a specific tract or a specific village 9 Section 10A -2 c IOC - we realize that the confidence of the sections rely on statistics of the present and are only projections into the '.uture We also realize that the development plan is prepared upon a developers best guacs on what the economic climate and housing desires and needs of the 'atura are going to be. In rogard to IOC this item is more an awareness statement for future applicants Of rlanned communities that the Planning Commission and the City Council have tho authority to initiate an amendment to the development plan If thin presents a problem in the Ordinance. WO suggest that it be removed, since the rity still maintains the right In answer to the correspondence by the attorneys, 1 The existing Edison casement is considered to be a connecter, as would be any property omnad by any public agents such as a high school rito, a fire station, city ?arx but not Victoria Parkway or a $treat dedicated t, the City. 2. Tito tam Director Review is never defined in the Planned :ommunity Ordinance because the definition is contained within the San Berne dino County Cale as adopted by Ordinance 17 As stated previously, director rovlew willbe employed on all uses within the development plan unless othervire specified in the text of the Development Plan 3. See responso number 3 for William Lyon letter 4 We concur with Suggested change of the the word 'measures" to 'data" S 5. Sao response number 6 for the William Lyon letter cR • 6. See response nurbor 8 for the William Lyon letter 7 Nu concur with Cho statemant contained in the attorney's letter. 8. It is the City's intent. to allow an applicant to Include A process within the Devalopmen` Plan Text where administrative adjustments may be mado with the approval of the Community Development Department such as we have in our current Zonxnq Ordinanco This will be allowed without necessitating an amendment to the DevnluPment Plan or Text 9 Please refer to response number 9 for the William Lyon letter. In regards to Lowie Hanes letter, I. We believe that the City should not recognize pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, etc , as meeting the requirements for open space or park dedication. It is a form of access, circulation, intocconnectlon of the various land uses, and should not, therefore, go towards meeting the requirements of open spare or park requirements, just as wo do not count parkways on streets or streets as meting our open space or park requirements 2. section SK - We have no problem in adding the Phrase and'or expert testimony that supports in deleting the words that display. 0. We do not concur with the suggested change as recommended We feel that flexibility is necessary in this case e. We believe we have clarified the intent of section 7A -2 which was rained in issues in the two previous correspondence S. Section IOC - Again this issue was raised previously In the correspondence from William Lyon Company and their attorney and responso is the amen. We have revised the Planned Cotmunity Ordinance to include all the changes that were recommended at the last " arming Commission meeting and to include those changes that we concur with in the letters from the Lewis Homes. William Lyon Company and their attorney RECOgHENDATION, It is recommended that the Planning Comsisslon adopt Resolution No. 79 -68 recosaending approval of Zoning Ordinance Aaondmont 79 -05 to the City Council. Mspe tSvelY s tom tied, I Coeaundty Development JL:BKHtcc ® Attachmontei Rosolution No. 79 -68 Lewis Homes Letter William Lyon Company Letter Pulop, Rolston, Burns s Wckitt[Sck Lotter RESOLUTIO:1 NO. 73 -60 A RESOLUT1'M Or T11C RIV1C110 CUCN*nGA pWn1I11G COItNISSION APPROVItr: ZONItR: ORDI11AUCE AMENDMENT NO. 79 -nS ESTABLIS11- I11G STA'MARDS AND REVIEa7 PROCEDURES FOR PL7JINLO CCWjNIIV DEVELOPNEMS MIEREAS, on November 14. 1979 the Plnnning Commission hold a duly advertised Public hearing for the abeve described project. SEMCN 1: That this project will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment and the NCgativa Peelaration is issued on November 14, 1979 SECT10:1 2: Purrosesr A The planned Community Zone is ine:uded in the Zoning regulations to achieve the following rurrosesd - 1 To promote and protect the Public health, safety, and welfare 2 To irplement the objectives and i j policies of the '. • General Plan il To safeguard and enhance en.ironmcntal amenities and the rpolity of development 4 To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting treat comprehensive and orderly ' planned use of land resources, 5 Te lesson congestion and assure convenience of access, to secure safety from fire, flood, and otiter di•tgers, to provide for adequate light, air, sunlight, and open erAco, to promote and encourage conservation of scarce resources, to prevent overcrowding of land and undue r concan ration of population, to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive, and harmonious eoesmeityt to attain a desirable balance of residential and employment olymrttnitirn: and to expedite the provision mf ndogoato and asrrntial Public services. G To facilitate drvelncxnt wirbin the City in accordance with the General r.an by Permitting greater flexibility and encnuraging core creative and iOaglnative designs it for major urben developrent projects subject to large - scalo community planning. d 7 To Promote more ecenomical and efficient use of the land } while providing a hart nihms variety of housing choices ami eumaercinl and industrial activities, a high level Of urban aronities, and presgrvatim of natural and scenic qualities of n space. d ^�f/ R To provido a nro.css for Initiation review, and ur rebeeulation of larga-ocale comprehensively Planned n ccmminitlas that afford& the maximum flexibility to the developer cal development thin the context of an overall Program and rpocif&c, Phased development piano coordinated h coordinated with the provision of necessary SEC1'fOtl Public servlees and facilities General Raqui romance a A Planned Commenity Zeno slhall Include a minimum area of 700 contiguous acres, under single ownership or otherwise subject to unified planning, construction, and development b'y a person, corporation, or other entity, Property owned b'1' Public a counted ..,,or al districts or local governments will 4242! be counted Cward the 700 acre minimum, but may b, used as a connector of single Ownership B• A Planned property wane shall to establi•hed upon appliea- set era property caner, !n accordance w,•0, the procedure sot forth in Section 61 427'1 of tha San Bernardino P ocedur Coda as adopted by Ordinance 1w oP the City of Ranef.� Cucamonga, and subject to the follwlnq City O lonsh 1 Submission of , Development Plan for approval by the Planning ,1. ordinance nanohiaelon and City 0ouncil, pursuant to this ordinance Determination by the Council that the establishment cf the zone and approval of tth Rothe estat Plan shall: a Planned urbartheodevel OP't of a eomprehenslvely- auporlot to development y ithin the zone that is alternato rcgulat l& otherwise allowable under b Pr0•I14e for development within the zone 142 a manner corltri.nt with the Concral Plan and with related City and growth =nagemant policies of the e Provlds for the eonztro,.tlon, improvement, or extmnsien of transportation faellltico, public utl!!t lr n, and 11161!, norvicen gquirnl by do- velopa.ent with tho zone S_CiL' 4: 0:r P,711MLIons A. Allowable uses in each Planne•l Community 742ne shall be as astnblllhed by a on plan Text approvad by the City 111 ref, T1w Pove"I'ment Plan Text may incor "tahlfsh earenec to specific base zone provisions, rate pnclflc usa lists with definitions y !beret,, po ctalnlnq B• Existing uses within the Planned Community 742110, at the tie, 'C'?1 • Of Its establishment shall be deemed allow,ble and incorpncatod in the navelopmrnt Plan, unless V minated dicemttlnued, ar changed Pursuant to n npeclfic time schedule incorporated in the Dovelopment Plan rest C Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, Public utility facilities and publicly -owned rscilitics Shall be allwable subject to a Conditional Use Parmit D Unless otherwise provided by the nevelopment Plan Text, accessory uses or facilities 811411 be subject to the Same use regulation Provisions as the principal use or facility E Unless specified as subject to a Conditional use Permit, each allowable use in the Planned Community ;ono shall be nubleet to Director Review ' Ibm CvCUIQtlona pursuant to Ordinance, t, 72 shall be allowable in cacti Planned Communittl SECff011 5: Site Develofmont Regulations and Performance Standards A. Planned reemunity Zone and all uses therein shall be designed and developed in a manner compatible with and eomPlerentary to existing and Potential development in • th• general vicinity of the zone Site Planning on the perimeter shall provide for the mutual rrotectior of the z<me mui surrounding property from potential adverse influence, B Thera shall be no minimum area, wldth, or depth requirement for individual lute, except as established by a Uovelopment Plan, a Conditional Use remit, Director Review or by loca- tion and Development Plan C. There Shall be no minimum yard rogulremvnt for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Con - diticnal Use permit, location and Dovolepment Plan, or by Director Poview D. TMre vhnil no no maximnm hcigbt or coverage requirement fot lrollvidnal lots, except as estahllshe.l by a Development rinn, n r.mdltloual O,r Permit (oeatinn and It:velclmcnt I•bn1 er by Director Review E Time shall tr no minimum usable OM) !.parr requirement for LnIly Lhu�1 Iota, oxrept as established by a pevelopment Plan, a Conditional Uno Pamit, location and Development Plan or by Director Review F rho mIximum nucbor of dwelling units within a Planned Community 4110 shall not exceed the amber of units indi- cated bl the rrncral Plan fee Property within the zone designated for residential use by the rencral Plan, provided that the distribution of units within the zone and the 7a miximm or minimum residontlal density on any individual nice or within degianated portions of tlm zone shall be governed by the Pevelopment Plan, Location and Develop- • meat clan, Conditional Use Parsut, or Director Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan. G All public streets within or abutting the development shall be dMicnted and Improved to City specifications for that particular classification of street Private streets within the development shall be permanently reserved and maintained for their intended Purr,so by Weans aearptabla to And enforceable by the City Other forms of areas, such as peder.trian ways, courts, plazas, driveways, horse tralln. bike trails, or open parking lots may not ba offered for dedication as A means of meeting requirements for open apage or park dedication requirements 11 all developm:nt witch a Planned Community Zone shall relate harmonrarsly to the torography of the site, shall make suitable Provision for the preservation of water courses, drainage areas, wooled areas, rongh terrain, and similar natural features, _ and shall otherwise be so destgned inasmuch As possible, to use and retain natural features and amenities to the test advantage llechanlcal and elactrlcal equipment including air cc Ali. tioners, antennas, Pumps, heating o- coollnq or ventil.sting equipment, exterior lightln7, or similar equipment :hall be • located and operated in r sinner so As not to unreasonably disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of nelghooring residents Excluding roof-mountea solar collector panels and decorative exterior lighting, all such equipment and cevlees Shall be screened from view from any abutting street, and shall not be located in a street yard J All areas for storage of maintananeo equipment, and all service art as including refuse storage and collection facilities, shall be enclosed by a,fenee, wall, 0. landscape sorter. K. All users within n Planned Co. Pity lone shall provide off - strcet ratking and loading facilities rursuant to 61.0219(6) of the San Bernardino County cede as Adopted by Ordinanco 17 of the city of rancho Cuc mnga The applicant may apply for and receive administrative relief from Section 61 0219(b) ,'.-thr tine of hevrlclmrnt rina Tn t approva by the Planning OOm- irgion aryl City Quuneil when verified proof has been 0nrhlttnd through gpecr[Ic examples of ext ^tang prnj Lets And /or cxj%,r trnlimouy that uulgrortq tr.rurcd l�trkinq standards or stalls. L. The proposed mcanq for assuring continuing existence , maintetmnre and nrcration of the various renames elements AM facilition • —2-3 N. Additional site •Ievelopment regulations and porforeanco standards applicable to Individual use, or to ,losigneted portions of a Planned eommunity lane ray be establithod by the Dovolupment Plan, Conditional Use Permit location and Pevoloplent Plan, or Director R^vlew apprw ,l pursaant to the Development Plan SECTION G, Pro - Application Procedure A. Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community Zone, the applicant or prospective developer should hold rcoliminarp consultations with the Pirector of Community DOvelopmnt and other !:ity offlntAls to Obtain information and guidance before entering into binding crernitmonts incurring substantial expense in the Preparation of plans, surveys and other data Such preliminary consultations shmild to relative to a conceptual development pl %na .hleh includes, but is not limited to, the following, 1 Proposed land "as to be developed within the zone Decelots,ent concepts to be employed l Schematic maps, illustrative material, and narrative sufffcient to describe the general relationships between land uses, and the intended design character and scale of • principal features e A rroliminary time srhodule for development, including quantltativo date , such as Population, housing units, land ua• acreage, and other data sufficient to illuntrato phasing of development arxi potential impact on public servics. requirements Fcllowinq initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section. the niroctor may require submission of a competently Prepared housing markgt analysis downatrdting the need for housing by price range and munber of dwalllnu units Such m.n ly,is may lr requested as A cart of the pro - application rovlr. prx•edure, may 1w• made a requirement for submission el nn nPpllcatlrn for a Planned Community 7�np or may L•c requested ns part of the environmental assessment or Fin C Folto ng initial Prelininary consultations pursuant to this section, the Dire.-tor may require ,IlLmlaq jar Of a ronl�trntll pr•larr.l rn vreial market .ratysla for any prOpOced shopping center or major commercial usep, ihwing the need for such uses in the location requested and the inadegiiaay of existing zoned niter to meet thla need The market aualynis shall lncluda, but not be lia!ted to, the following, I Voterminatlen of putential trade arcs. -211 2 P.stimatcs of existin ant' , tnre population of the trade area • 3 retermination of existing and poto,,tlal effective buying power in the trado area 4 Determination of the net pocan idl customer buying Power for the proposed commercial development Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre- appli- cation review procedure, or my be made a requirement for for ormely'benrequestedpas cpart not the environmao®lnassessment or EIR. Follm+ing initial preliminary consultation pursuant to this section, tie Director may rcgdlre presentation of the conceptual devalorcent plan to the Planning Commissiom. Su: aeuta- tion shall be for infomstional rutposea only, a d will bs in addition to subsrqucnt public review requiramc„ -a peraunt to An application for a P1annod f-a unity 7xine and subalsaten of rcvclormcnt plan SE4rI00 7 Development Plan A. The Develorrmnt Plan to be nubmi•ted with an application for a Planned Community Zone shall include the following, 1 A boundary qurvcy mar of the property and a calculation of the lrocs lani area within the proposed rono A tentative subdivision mar may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property 2 A tepegraptic MAP and general grading concept plan with specific sections for sensitive areas, as determined by the Grading Comnitt ^o for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of tho property, ah n at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes over 21 or lees For natural slopes over 2s contour interval shall not exceed 5 feec 3 ears and supporting tabulations aMwing the current General Plan Lind use designation, the current zoning clas,ification, and th- current land use within the proposed zone and on adjacent siten within 30D feat The location of structures and other significant imrrovements shall be shown 4 A 1"'I use Plan identifying areas within the proposed z. -,t and •ises to be devolor ^d t ^o rci ^, sucrprtei by rr•r -retl -r rrolectrd a ^reave, rorulntion, housing units, emrloymmnt, and such rclatel Planning and devrlop+ nt data as the Director of Community Development may require S A •iovelcTe nt rim Indicating the q ^m:ral phacinq or Antici ttec schMuln, indicating the total phasing of the Planned 0,mmunity and arean to ho drvelorml in phases and the anticiratoi tier schedule for beginning of construction and for completion of cacti paase; of devnlopment Including pro rata share Of ics, parks and open space. This is a gtneralized sche•lule and may be adjusted according to market con-traints an the Community develops A circulation plan, showing existing and proposed public and private atreota, padestrianways, trials, and related transportation deceits or circulation featuroa required to serve the proposed development The e.rculatim plan shell be supported by schematic designs of principal traffic and circulation impro•meents, and such traffic engineering data as required by the director to domon- strate that existing end proposed facilities, both within and outside the zone, shall he adequate to some land uses proposed by tho Development Plan 7 A preliminary report and overall plan describing mticl -_ pitted requirecents and proposed means of providing utility faci!itles and public sa micas, including but not limited to, s•om drainage, sewage disposal, water supply, perks and recreation, and school facilities Q M accomranylag Dovelepmeht Plan Text netting forth the basic land use regulations, cite drvelolrent regulations and perfomance standards designed to govern each use area identified by the lawl use plan The text need not incogorate the eame level of detail as found in the regulations for base zones, but shell be as comprehensive as necessary to establish basic provisions and regula- tions which shall govern subsequent approval of specific tracts or developments within the Planned Community Zone. The trxt shall Include, but :.ot be limited to, the following provisfonax a. A listing of allowable uses within each use area, including such qualifying descriptions or definitions and requirements for Conditional Use Permits as may be applicable b Maximum and minimum rev -1 itlons, as appropriate governing residential oens'ty, alto covorage, lot size s• , dimv.nnions, yard require - rvmts, usable open spacu, larolscaping, and porfotmarco st ndardc e. Pequirewl yardn, Inrdncapinq or niter site developmnt tegulations to he applicable adjacrnt to other zones at the perimeter of the Planne.l Community Zone. ® d ssuprlenc -ntal Illustration an required, establishing t1u. basic architectural character and conamity r•virorocntaL design qualities to ha attained throughout the Planed Community Zone and within particular.portignn of the zone . Such ether information, such as A tape.rrAphle model in area esresnive niPp,•, MY to roquire•1 try the Director of CocmnunildW Devnlcymnt, the PlAnning Commission, or the City Council to Psbmit complete analyst+ and aPpraisul of the development, and to facilitate adoption or the Planned CormenitY Zonu and the pcvolopmrnt Plan by the City Council SCCfI011 83 adoption of 70110 and Development Plan A. An ury•lieation for a Planned Coamunity Zmo and the Development Plan submitted with the application shell bf subject to review Ind approval in the same manner as prescribed in Section 61.0221 of the San Bernardino Colnty Code as Adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Pat, Planned Corrnaity Zone ratablinhel shall be indicated on the Zoning Iilr by tiro letter 'PC' followed by a r •erenee number identifying oneh sorarate rAne Tile Development Plan as ,olirled And arrroved by tiro City Council, shall be crnnidcrcd to be a part of tills ordinance, and shall be 1•lentifled by reference to the eorresromting designation of each Specific Planned X•araunity +ono cn the Zoning tan Sr.CP10N 93 Amendments to Development Plan A nevelolanent Plan may bu an^miod in the some manner as rrovided by f.ection 61 11221 of the Son Bernardino County Coda as adopted by Ordinance, 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a change of zone boundaries or for a change in the regulations applicable with a zone Amendment Of a PPValopmrnt Plan shall be rubleet to the Dame findings as proscribed for Initial enactment of s Planned Camraunity zone and adoption of the Development Plan applicable to the Planned Ceemunity Zone An amandwnt to a Dcvelopncnt Plan nay be initiated by the City Plnnninq meets +ion or the Council, or may be initiate4 by the originnl arrllrant rnr the Planned Community 74M or a successor thereto, Provided such nrpllcant or sucroAsor has, nt tie tuna of nrPlieatlon foe nn anrn•tmnnt, a .-Pntinuinq coetrollia4 Interest in demrlPr, nt or management of uscn within the Planned Cormlaity ,vin S°CT1011 19 Pevicv of IY_•velopeent Progress A. 7Tr nueetno of romoafty Dem•^lapnen! zlrall review each Planned Coxvonity Z,,ie nnnualll ani -11411 submit a "par - to thr Planninq Commission .1n4 City Con ocll containing the r.t!WIngt 0 I A uwy of the development stntdn within the zone and '• an a!`- Pnnmrnt of Venereal dnrirq the lemr toward em- r pi'''ton of ,tevrloPment avUierited 1•v the Developmena -Ian lncludlnn adherence to development schedules and phasing. / / to .. A ntatement mf m,y change, in lnnd unn and economic dcvoloRscnt tte,wis, housing market indicators, eomotciai and industrial dovclepnent rates, or programs for provision of public faeilltie, and services viich, in the opinion of the Director, vary significantly from those upon which the Development Plan were based, and which could affect WIVI soly rentinued progress toward complwtion of dvolopment within the zone D. A copy of the nnnual report of the Director shall be provided to the applicant and to such other Interested parties or successors as deemed appropriate by the D- rector. APPROVED NID ADOPTED THIS 10T1 DAY OF NOVI718ER. 1979 PUNNING COV"SS10" OF T11C CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGI • V Iic rr,on Pe. tt �njiq{ min ATTEST, - — Secretary of the Plnnning Conminsion I, JACK WI, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Peaolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 14th any of November, 1979, AYES, comll1ISSIONurt Dahl, Tblstoy, Jonas, Garcia, Rempel DOES, CUP, US TONERS, Nona ARSCIT 0YV%ISSICN",q. Noun 10 ✓0, \111.L1 \�I LIU. \�t�raiuiiy • 19 CORPORATE PLAZA NEB 'PORT BEACH CALIF 92660 (7141 833 3600 November 20, 1979 •1i'� 01 pr. k-rfl �;.( „,•nh(t,l G'L:i. U'•IIY r ft -r 0; ••Syr PEPf City of Rancho Cucamonga PO Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91770 A9 Pli TlEt0113011V' 111L'(3(i15;G Attention: Berry Hogan ! Subject: P. C Ordinance - City of Rancho Cbcamenda Dear Barry: I appreciate all of your efforts and time spent with Dave Colgan in wo-king on the PC P.dinance r By not-orate !.ctor- Dave will be giving you his comments and concerns relative to the ordinance, which may in some cellos duplicate my comments. i Section 2,A -5 I understand these are Injected Into the PC Ordinance because the City's zoning ordinance has not been adopted and these are philosophical kinds of things . that are in ordinances Following the adoption of the zoning ordinance these items could be deleted from this particular section of the PC Ordinance I am referring to the sentences that deal with light, air, sunlight, prevent overcrowding, prevent undue concen- tration of population, etc We're comfortable with this as is but the above is my understanding relative to future potentidl changes of this section i Section 3,A We're endeavoring with an L shaped piece in our Wind Rows community to tie that property up or got the owner to be a signator to the Victoria PC. If neither of these options are completed It wuld be our Intention to have the council rule that Victoria does satisfy tiro contiguous requirement at the time the PC Ordinance is adopted Section 5,G Our plan provides for Victoria Parkway to be a 1(nrir park, and as such we hove nude It wlder to allcw for the median as well as the rights -of -way beht,.d the curb to f mctlon as park Consequ -nay. I wr,nld wmrt to insure that rvvn tivn,gh Victoria Pnrrway Is (will he) a dedicated right -of -way that ti,e land within ti,e parkway will be counted as open spnce Likewise. I believe that all of ti,e Interval trails and pascal should also serve as open apace. REAL ESTATE O E PMENT pnrticularly in light of the fact that they tie the entire PC together and will elan be used for tree row* to eonalderbly enhance the beauty of Victoria and the City of Rancho Cucamonga Its my belief that these values ate worth their cost to land and therefore should qualify as open space. I believe both Victoria Parkway and our peace% should qualify as parklands and open space Secondly, my question le - for the parkways that we provide within public street right -of -ways on streets other than Victoria Parkway - will theses areas be counted as parklands and /or open space? Section 5.9 It would be my preference that we would not reference the San Bernardfno County offxtreot parking and loading facilities ordinance provided we can comp to with our own parking ordinance as a part of the PC. We would be willing to go along with thin reference in the PC zone_ as an interim measure but its nur b ^lief that the PC Ordinance could be approved without reference to the County Ordinance. Section 6,E We feel that this particular paragraph needs to be expanded to make clear the reasons for this provision • Section 6,B&C We request that both of these requirementx for housing market or comuerclal market analysts be deleted. As before, our belief In that to require this kind of analysts for zoning or oven n tentative tract action Is without precedent to our knowledge we feel that any Information submitted to Justify uses that we are recommending at the time zoning In put on would not be able to Justify accurately the demand for any of those uses 10 to 15 years from new. None of us can see with any degree of certainty that far down the road. Con - xequently, any marketing analysis that is making projections Char go out Inca 15 years are really of no use. Harker analysts in the short run ban a much higher degree of validity, but again changes In financing, costs, etc. can elan invalidate short term marker analysis Its our belief that these 2 paragraphs not only will fall to be useful to the city, but they also represent In our minds the pn%sibility of conatricttnn of the free enterprise system as well as entrepreneurial talent in the private sector We believe strongly that these two paragraphs are not going to enhance Victoria in the short or long term. and to fact may frustrate our being able to move ahead with Victoria. We request that these requirements be removed. • -2- Section 7,A -2 A conceptual grading plan for contours of 22 or o topographic typo of model would not serve any function in Victoria We experience overall a 22 or less grade On a topographic model 1 don't believe the accuracy would be such that a 22 grade could even be made with any degree of confidence that the model is within that margin It would be my recommendation that grading as a function of zoning would be more appropriate In the hillside areas where grades are In excess of 102 Section 7,A -5 Phasing of major villages or areas within a PC at time of zoning is fine. Chasing beyond that would be premature at the zoning stage in that wo are often still trying to decide which area of the project ve should phase first It would be auto appropriate to Insure that phasing of the project will produce the right percentage of open space and public use and recreational facilities if those were considered at time of tentative map approval and not zoning. There are many constrictions to phasing and many considerations including utilities as well as major backbone improvements together with land,escrov provisions, - not to mention front end costs of streets, circulation systems as well as public infrastructure needs All of the above are very complex to work out and should not be prematurely cast at the zoning stage of development in great detail Section 10,A -2 Section IO,C We do not feel either one of these provisions should be In the PC ordinance in that neither one of them could be Implemented with any degree of confidence nor offer us any assurance of being able to build Victoria as planned, and to provide infrastructure and backbone Improvements commensurate with the dwelling unite and uses that we are currently anticipating Massive changes of the tvpe these two paragraphs allow would render the entire protean that we are going thru new useless, and we could not continue to proceed If that were our belief. I would like to wet with you for breakfast or lunch and go through my commatd:e and explain them in more detail I am pleased with the ordinance overall and think it to generally a very worlable ordinance and was wall C0nlelVed 1 do feel, hovcver, tbat some of the above Items need to be changed or modtfted to meet both city concerns as well as developer needs. I look forward to sharing mat thoughts with you ret -tive to the above Pointe personally Sincerely, c.:t Joe Dilnrin Cenr Haggett, Levis THE WILLIAM LYON CO?1PA.NY Oro Tntmpklns, SWA Dave Colgan C ��` !;m Cary Frye V I Senior Project Manager n,� a Q ,Z LS HOMES 'tfe Nora, MtAaaan Mnut PO Be- flu uo'p -a CA :1'66 lit rtfeft' November 28, 1070 fir Herrwn Renpel. Chairman Planning Coomisdnn City of Rancho Cucamonga Poet Office Box 797 Rancho Cucsmpnga. CA 91730 Reference: Planned Community Zoning Ordinance Dear Herman: • Sinrn receLvinp the Iatret draft copv of the proposed ordinance at your 'mat ,reting, we Imve had an oppnrtunity to review its contents As von know , the creation of a Planned Conmunity on the part of the developer/ applicant involves considerably more expense than traditional eontnR. Both the developer and the City Are willing to exert the extra effort because it is believed that options not otherwise available can be used to create a mre desirable project To quote the ordinance: Purposes (Section 2:A.6 ) "To facilitate develepment wrthin the Citv in accordAirc vith the General Plan by PER41TTINC (:REATFR FLFTIRiLITY AND ENCDIRACINC 'IDRF CREATITP MD VtArl4ATLt'F DESIGNS for major urhan development projects subject to inrae —scale co minty planntnG." (emphasis ndded) To that end, we wpr'A tike to propose n few modifieattons eomlatent with the Intent of t'c ordinance As follow: The ordinance enrn"rames creative open space; however, no incentive in afforded the developer to meet that objective Ile arm sympathetic to the City's concern over responsibility for mifntenance of trails And other small open spnees, And In fact intend that they not be dedicated nor publicly maintained Nevertheless, unless some incentive Is given to the doveloper to creAte these spaces, they will likely not he Included Lt planned conmunttles. We, therefore, suggest the follydng ar.toritneation shown underllned M Mr. Herman Rmpel, Chairman Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga November 28. 1979 Page 2 • Site Development Regulations (Section S:r.. Re: Open Space) "—Other rotas of access, such As pedestrian ways, courts, Plazas* dr Venotseb horse trails, bike traits, or open parking recoRnlred as a Offered for ded lea [Ion but $hail be or park dedication requirements.. ng requirements for °pen apaco The staff has drafted the parking requirements partgrAph with a view to erecting flexible and workable Precludes Innovative and solutions; however, the language still ut tons and we would therefore propose the followlnR additions shown underlined: Site Development Regulation, (Section S:R Re: Parking) " fie applicant may apply for and receive relief from Section 61 r219(b) at the time Of administrative Development Plan Text approval by the Planning Cantisston and City Cauncll when verified Proof has been submitted through specific examples of oils& nS DroJects and /or expert through tlmonv that supports that d4ap4ey reduced perking standards or atalls.T— ---� Tyr additional languago will allow for the Creative solutions developed by competent solut inns. professionals based on sim.lar, but not Identical Section 6 of the draft ordinance provides for aarket analyses at the discretion ev the staff Because of the IonR - ranee nature of Planned Community development, any market analysis will nee •,$atilt be Reneral In nature and of doubtful use in deternining ult mate dr. -+ upon prof Oct completion. We question tFe need for such s Vdv, but at the least, request that the FIR he allowed to meet these req•tren: nt, The the latter lastRentencel of Sect, as 6a BCepol6hr. ;bv the fol lows •g changes to Pre - Application Procedure (Sections 6 :P and A;r Prr :M,krt Analyst,) .gash en41,4n sav be retnreted es a tort eF the ere- epfyfs'4F, rev4ev Penesdnre, sav be node n relnirenene fnr snhnFan4 «n of en npr"onHan for o 94annr4 gee -4n4ty gene er new be regne,ted Such r.° of��ement "ay ba net al Part of the rovl romrntal ascent or FIR. -'� • 2-3 Mr. Homan Rmpel, Chairman Planning :®mission ' City of Rincho Cucamonga • November 28, 1979 Page 3 With respect to requirements for a telegraphic nap and grading plan, we have no objection to supplying extsting grades and proposed drainage plans However, we believe a grading plan covering the entire Planned Community at inception is not feasible Ye, therefore, propose the following change: Development Plan (Section 7:A.2. Pe: Topographic *tap) "A topographic map and conceptual grading drains a plan for the property and adjacent lend within FRO feet of the property, shave at extatinp contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes 2% or lees finally, ve are concerned that the City proposes to retain unilateral rights to change the development plans created by the developer /. . applicant which have been subjected to Public Hearin and approval by the City. As the Planned Cavm.nity develop,, the developer will of necessity have an increasingly large investment in the c"ounit, and can only justify such based on his ability to continua levelopeent as proposed If market conditions indicate a change in the Planned • Comunity to desirable, the developer would be the first to make much requcnts and should retain the right to do so. He therefore request you delete Section (O:C We appreciate the time and consldsratinn which you have given to this matter Very truly yours, LEWIS H04ES Eugene A Mo.,.t� Vice President, Project Manngvnont Eeli:bs:2113r cc: lack Lam i 8`f FULOP. ROLSTON. BURNS 8 MCKITTRH:K • A lnv t OPM1lw Ar1OV MOO IAt \1t.111R WUL{\A" November 23, 1979 rc•r rn nee wee -sro NFR h•RI e[411 t \t11�•R V1A P�.N\ Inn ,.� elwt 11 I"t )HI W1. FLOO. ' 11 t o 11aIPu ,w[ 60.'UvIAP RKL➢u FULLS CALMOR4LA W!I 1-I ll ve e•aw w,e ws+ M t Nr. Barry Hogan Assistant Planning Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 er coua>u IkvIM to FULOP t \FL! FULOXMK uIR 1w Fr Im 01K u 1 rw\ IIMI Tl MV u \lra rw <Imv vs nor. nr AFr Rlnr M Newport Beach Re: Proposed Planned Community Zone Ordinance Dear Barry: We have reviewed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's revised draft of the Planned Cotmnunity Zone Ordinance (*PC Ordinance") presented to the Planning commission on November 14, 1979. We understand that the Planning Commission has continued hearings on that proposed PC Ordinance until November 28, 1979. Previously we discussed The William Lyon Company's ('Lyon's') ideas and suggested changes with you following our review of the City's original draft of the PC Ordinance. Some of those suggested changes have been incorporated into the revised draft of the PC Ordinance currently being con- sidered by the Planning Conmission. dowever, we have the following concerns with some of the provisions in the re- vised draft. 1 As revised, Section 3(A) has been modified so Chit property owned by public utilities, local districts or local governments, while not counted toward the 300 acre minimum for a PC Zone, may be used as 'connectors- in order to meet the requirements that property zoned PC must be con- tinuous and must be under singlr ownership or subject to unified punning. �5 FULOP. ROLSTON BURNS B MCKITTRICK A 11 \1 . 111VXAIINV Mr. Barry Hogan November 23, 1979 Page Two n u Our concern with revised Section 3(A) regards the interpretation and application of the contiguity requirement and the use of connectors. For your reference, Exhibit "A", attached and incorporated herein by this reference, is an ownership map showing the property proposed to be included within the Victoria Pla-med Community ( "Victoria PC"). Those areas crosshatches in red denote property currently owned or controlled by Lyon. The area crosshatched in green denotes the Southern California Edison Easement ( "Edison Easement ") areas. Lyor expects to either acquire the bal- ance of the property ircluded within the boundaries of the proposed Victoria PC as shown on Exhibit A, or to have the landowners of the prop% -rty join w -th Lyon in applying for PC zoning. If, however, ?.von is unable to acquire the balance of property shown within *.fa proposed Victoria PC or the remaining lando .•ts 1:110ase not to join Lyon in applying for PC zoning, we interpret Section 3(A) to provide that the Edison Easement, being a "connector" along with the fact that Victoria Parkw.,y, being a street dedicated to the public, will satisfy the contiguity requirement so that all property owned by ayon may be included within a single PC S zone. 2. A number of provisions in the PC Ordinance, including Section 4E and Sections 5B, C, D, E, F and M, tie various us or oulk regulation requirements to "Director Review" The _orm "Director Review" is never defined and we are uncertain as to the amount of discretion the Director of Community Development would have or the criteria he would use in revie•aing particular aspects of the PC. Further, we are uncertain whether Director Review will be employed only where use cr bulk regulations are not specified in a Develop- ment Plan, or whether Director Review will be in addition to or is a v1:t0 power over such regulations prescribed in a Development Plan Therefore, those provisions referring to "Director Review" should be clarified by defining both " Director Review" and the criteria to be used by the Director in evaluating use and bulk regulations in the PC, and further, provieing that in establishing use and bulk regulations, Director Review will only be employed where such regulations are not otherwise included within a Development Plan. Ll FULOP, ROLSTON BURNS 8 MCKITTRICK A t1. ...PIV11n1k" Hr. Barry Hogan • November 23, 1979 Page Three 3. Paragraph 5(G) provides in part that: "Other forms of access, such as pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveways, horse trails, bike trails or open parking lots shall not be offered for dedication as a means of meeting requirements for open space and park dedication require- ments." In our previous discussions, you informed us that the intent of the provision is to avoid placing the City in a position _f maintaining plazas, horse trails and bike trails. Lyon currently contemplates that maintenance of those plazas, horse trails and bike trails will be funded by means of a special assessment district However, horse trails, bike trails and other improvements such as Victoria Parkway which is designed as a "linear park ", should be counted toward meeting minimum open space or park dedication requirements. We request that Section 5(G) be revised to provide that although such items as plazas, horse trails and bike trail: will not be subject to dedication to or any maintenance by the City, they will, nevertheless, be eli- gible for inclusion in meatiP3 minimum open space and park requirements. • 4. We suggest that Section 6(4) be amended by deleting the word "measures" in line 2 and inserting the term 'data" or 'information'. S. Sections 6(8) and (C) requiring that housing marvet and commercial market analysis may be required as part of the pre - application process, should be deleted. The type of marketing data proposed to be required is generally regarded as being of only short term value. Particularly, where the Victoria Planned Community is to be built out in a ton to fifteen year time frame, the Environmental Impact Reports will adequately discuss any market data evaluations necessary The time and expense involved in preparing such • market analysis at the pre - application stage of processing • PC Zone are nut justified by the minimal value of such market data. 6. Section 7(A)(5) should be revised in two respects. First, the provision should clearly indicate that it relates only to phasing of major planning areas, and rot individual tracts, within the PC Second, the last sentence of Section 7(A)(5) requiring that the Development Plan coordinate improvement of open spaces and the construction of buildings should be deleted since these types of con- ® siderations are more appropriate at the tentative tract map approval stage. USA "Lop. ROLSTO. BURNS a AICIJr TRICK '� lnM' N 1 ORMXAf1UN Mr Barry Hogan Nelember 23, 1979 Pago Fnur 7• Section 7(A)(8) should be modifled by delet- ing the form °specific plans and inserting the phrase specific tracts or development within the PC Planned com- munity Zone ° He suggest this change so that the term specific plan* is not confused with the adoption of the General Plan or a Specific Plan as provided by the Govern - «.ent Code. S. amendment of In relation to Section 9 providing for the Development Plan, we understand that while You have determined not to include a ents, Lyon will, never - separate provision dealing with administrative adjustm thcloss, be able to p. ride a procedure in its Development Plan and PC Text which sanctions administrative adjustments for such matters as density transfers between the specified planning areas within the PC Zone, without the necessity of amending the Development Plan or PC Text. 9. Finaily, Sections 10(A)(2) and 10(C) dealing with annual Director review of development progress within the FC one should be deie *.,., Those sections would allow the PlanninS ommis, on or City Council, on their own initia- tive, to substan :.ially amend the PC text and the intensity or types of uses previously approved. Since in developing the property within the FC Zone, substantial expenditutos and commitments of resources will be made to construct the infrastructure for the project, since a total integrated Plan fox development within flexible limits is being prop- osed by Lyon, and since it is inappropriate for the City to make economic decisicia for Lyon in constructing the develop- ment, these sections are entirely inappropriate and should be deleted Follo•+ing your review of the foregoine, de would enjoy the opportunity of further discussing our concerns with you. call If you hove any questions please feel free to /Ve'/r� truly yours, FULOP, ROLSToti, BURtISa6 ICKITTR ICK DLC:sm cc: Mr. Gary Frye Mr. Don Tomklns Mr, Robert Jacob G 0 L] • 0 Uf �or- ron�ro /L/Pa✓ f td.Jn. B.rn.e.hs ORDINANCE NO. 94 AN ORDINANCE OF TPE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AHEND- ItENT NO. 79 -05 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COVANiTY DEVELOPHENTS The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Purposes: A. The Planned Community Zone is included in the Zoning regulations to achieve the following purposes. 1. To promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. 2. To implement the objectives and policies of the _ General Plan. 3. To safeguard and enhance envi onmental amenities and the quality of development • 4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land resources LJ S. To lessen congestion and assure convenience of access; to secure safety from fire, flood, and other dangers; to provide for adequate light, air, sunlight, and open space; to promote and encourage conservation of scarce resources; to prevent overcrowding of land and und6e concentration of population; to facilitate the creation of a convenient, attractive, and nanronlous community; to attain a desirable balance of residential and employment opportunities; and to expedite 'J= providinn of i equate and essential public services. 6 To facilitate development within the City in accordance with the General Plan by permitting greater flexibility and encouraging more creative and imaginative designs for major urban development projects subject to large - scale community planning 7. To promote more economical and efficient use of the land while providing a harmonious variety of housing choices and commercial and Industrial activities, a high level of urban amenities, and preservation of natural and scenic qualities of open space. Ordinance llo. 94 Page 2 B. To provide a process for initiation, review, and regulation of large -scale comprehensively planned urban tcmmunities that affords the maximum flexibility to the developer within the context of an overall development program and specific, phased development plans coordinated with the provision of necessary public services and facilities SECTION 2: General Requirements A A Planned Community Zone shall include a minimum area of 300 contiguous acres, under single ownership or otherwise subject to unified planning, construction, and development by q person, corporation, or other entity; property owned by public utilities, local districts or local goverrmerts will not be counted toward the 300 acre minimum, but may be used as a connector of single ownership. B. A Planned Community Zone shall be established upon application of a property owner, in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 61 0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and subject to the following provisions: 1 Submission of a Development Plan for approval by the Planning Commission and City Counc,l. pursuant to • this ordinance. Oeterm- nation by the Council that the establishment of the zone and approval of the Development Plan shall a Provide for the development of a comprehensively - planned urban community within the zone that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. b. Provide for development within the zone in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management Policies of the City C. Provide for the construction, improvement, 3r extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development with the zone SECTIOR 3: Use Regulations A. Allowable uses in each Planned Commnity Zone shall be as established by a Development Plan Text approved by the City Council The Development Plan Text may incorporate uses by reference to specific base zone Provisions, or may • establish specific use lists with definitions pertaining thereto. �I Ordinance No. 94 Page 3 • B. Existing uses within the Planned Community Zone at the time of its establishment shall be deemed allowable and incorporated in the Development Plan, unless terminated discontinued, or changed pursuant to a specific time schedule incorporated in the Development Plan Text C. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, public utility facilities and publicly -owned facilities shall be allowable subject to a Conditional Use Permit D. Unless otherwise provided by the Development Plan Text, accessory uses or facilities shall be subject to the same use regulation provisions as the principal use or facility E Unless specified as subject to a Conditional Use Permit, each allowable use in the Planned Community Zone shall be subject to Director Review. F Home Occupations pursuant to Ordinance No 72 shall be allowable in each Planned Community SECTION 4: Site Development Regulations and Performance Standards A ® Planned Community Zone and all uses therein shall be in with and designed and developed a manner compatible complementary to existing and potential development in the general vicinity of the zone Site planning on the perimeter shall provide for the mutual protection of the zone .d surrounding property from potential adverse influences B There shall be no minimum area, width, or depth requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Director Review or by Location and Development Plan. C There shall be no minimum yard requirement for individual lots except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Perini *, Location and Development Plan, or by Director Review D. There shall be no minimum usable open space requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director Review. E There s.,all be no minimum usable open space requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Deve %went Plan or by Director Review. C't Ordinance No. 94 Page 4 F. The maximum number of dwelling units within a Plan Community Zone shall not exceed the number of unitned • indicated by the General Pla s n for property within the zone designated for residential use by the General Plan, prcvided that the distribution of units within the zone and the maximum or minimum residential density on any individual site or within designated portions of the zone shall be governed by the Development Plan, Location and Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, or Director ( Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan G. All public streets within or abutting the development shall be dedicated and Improved to City specifications for that particular classification of street. Private streets within the development shall 4&1MTtpnentIy reserved and maintained rce their ithen � to and enforceable by the C t access, e such as Pedestrian ways, courts, plazas, driveways horse ft� trails, bike trails, or open parking lots may not be offered for dedication as a means of meeting requirements —� for open space or park dedication requirements N. All development within a Planned Connwnity Zone shall relate harmoniously to the topography of the site, shall make suitable Provision for the preservation of water courses, drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain, and similar natural features, use andiretaimm�atural featuresnandizmenitiesstothebbest to • advantage. I. Mechanical and electrical equipment, including air conditioners, antennas, pumps, heating or coolinlg or ventilating locatteedenandeoperatedlinhatmanner somasanotgtounreasonably disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of neighboring residents Excluding roof - mounted solar collector panels and shall decorative bscreened from9view9fromlany abutting street, and shall not be located in a street yard. J areas for onifacilities, service shall be enclosed by a fence, wall, or landscape screen. K. All uses within a Planned Community Zone shall provide off - street parking and loading facilities Pursuant to 61 0219(b) of the San. Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordi+ance Of the Ci rc uca n a The a;plicant may apply for and receive adm inlstrativerlief from Section 6iuc( o at the time of Developnent Plan Tentative approval by the h) Planning Car•nlssion and it Council when verified proof has been submitted through specific examples of existing projects and /or expert testimony that supports reduced parking standards or stalls. Ordinance No. 94 Page 5 • SECTION 5: H :t,..._ .., . —._.— L. The proposed means for assuring continuing existence, maintenance and operation of the various common elements and facilities. M. Additional site development regulations and performance standards applicable to individual uses or to designated portions of a Olanned Community Zone may be estabitshed by the Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan, or Director Review approval pursuant to the Development Plan. Pre - Application Procedure A. Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community Zone, the applicant or prospective developer should hold preliminary consultations with the Director of Community Development and other City officials to obtain information and guidance before entering into binding commitcents incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. St-.h preliminary consultations should be relative to a conceptual development plans which includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Proposed land uses to be developed within the zone. 2. Development concepts to be employed. 3. Schematic maps, illustrative material, and narrative sufficient to describe the general relationships between land uses, and the intended desgin character and scale of principal features. 4. A preliminary time schedule for development, including quantitative data, such as population, housing units, land use acreage, and other data sufficient to illustrate phasing of development and potential impact on public service requirements. B. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared housing market analysis, demonstrating the need for housing by price range and number of dwelling units Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre - application review procedure, may be made a requirencnt for submission of an application for a Planned Community Zone or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or EIR. C. Following initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prepared commercial market analysis for any proposed shopping center of major commercial uses, showing the need for such uses in the location requested and the inadequacy of existing zoned sites to meet this need. The market analysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: P/ Ordinance No. 94 Page 6 1. Determination of potential trade area. 2. Estimates of existing and future population of the trade area. 3. Determlgatlor of existing and potential effective buying power in the trade area. 4. Determination of the net potential customer buying power for the proposed commercial development. Such analysis may be requested as a part of the pre - application review procedure, or may be made a req,iire ent for submission of an application for a Planned Coamunity zone, or may be requested as part of the environmental assessment or EIR. D. Following initial preliminary consultation pursuant to this . section, the Director may require presentation of the conceptual development plan to the Planning Commission. Such presentation shall be for information purposes only, and shalt be In addition to subsequent public review requirements pursuant to an application for a Planned Community Zone and submission of Development Plan. SECTION 6: Development Plan i A. The Development Plan to be submitted with an application for a Planned Community Zone shall include the following: 1. A boundary survey nap of the property and a calculation Of the gross land area within the proposed zone A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. 2. A topographic nap and general grading concept plan with specific sections for sensitive areas, as determined by the Grading Committee for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of thz property, shown at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes over 2: or less. For natural Slopes over 2% contour interval shall not exceed 5 feet. 3 Maps and supporting tabulations showing the current General Plan lard use designation, the current zoning classification, and the current land use within the proposed zone and on adjacent sites within 300 feet. The location of structures and other significant improvements shall be shown 4. A land use plan identifying areas within the proposed 40 zone and uses to be developed therein, supported by proposed or projected acreage, population housing units, employment, and s Ch related lannI ya dv Anent - ` development data ache erector of �ommuni� Be elo may require. Ordinance No. 94 Page 7 e S. lng development tedpschedule, indicatingethe total phasing of the Planned Community and areas to be developed to phases and the anticipated time and for schedule for beginning of construction completion of each phase of development including a pro rata share of amenities, parks and open space. b adjusted generalized This is a Community as the constraints according tomarke onstra a develops. 6. A circulation plan, showing existing and proposed trials, • public and private streets, pedestrianways, and related transportation access or circulation required to serve the proposed development. features The circulation plan shall be supported by schematic and circulation improvements, designs of principal traffic and such traffic engineering data as required by rbothdwwithinrand outsideithenzone, proposed the facilities, be adequate to serve land uses proposed by the Development Plan 7 rrequirrements rproposed anticipated and means of providing utility facilities and public services, • including but not limited to ' storm supply. parks and and ge disposal, water school facilities 8. A.1 accompanying Development Plan Text setting forth the basic land use regulations, site development designed to regulations and performance standards use area identified by the land use govern each plan The text need not incorporate the same level of detail as found in the regulations for base zones, establish but shall be as comprehensive basic provisions and necessary shall govern regulations whichsha o subsequent approval of specific tracts or developments within the mitedyto,nthe following include. but not be l� provisions: area, a. including suchlqualifyingedescriptionshorse for conditional Use definitions and requirements Permits as may be applicable. b. Maximum and minimum regulations, as appropriate governing residential density, site coverage, dimensions, yard requirements, usable ® lot size and open space, landscaping, and performance standards. Ordinance No. 94 Page 8 c. Required yards, landscaping or other site developrient regulations to be applicable adjacent to other zones at the perimeter of the Planned Community Zone d Supplemental illustrations as required, establishing the basic architectural character and comm:nity environmental character and community environmental design qualities to be attained throughout the Planned Community Zone and within particular portions of the zone. 9. Such other information, such as a topographic model In areas of excessive slope, may be required by the Director of Community Development, the Planning Commission, or the City Council to permit complete analysis and appraisal of the development, and to facilitate adoption of the Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan by the City Council. SECTION 7: Adoption of Zone and Development Plan A. An application for a Planned Community Zone and the Development Plan submitted with the application shall be subject to review and approval in the same manner as prescribed in Section 61 0221 of the San Bernardino • County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamogna Each Planned Community Zone established shall be indicated on the Zoning Nap by the letter "PC" followed by a reference number identifying each separate zone. The Development Plan as modified and approved by the City Council, shall be considered to be a part of this ordinance,and shall be identified by reference to the corresponding designation of each specific Planned Community Zone on the Zoning Map. SECTION 8: Amendments to Development Plan A. A Development Plan may be amended in the same manner as provided by Section 61 0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a change of zone boundaries or for a change in the regulations applicable with a zone. Amendment of a Development Plan shall be subject to the same findings as prescribed for initial enactment of a Planned Community Zone and adoptira of the Development Plan applicable to the Planned Community Zone. An •me-'nent to a Development Plan may be initiated by the City Planning Corm .sion or the Council, or may be S initiated by the original applicant for the Planned Community Zone or a successor thereto, provided such applicant or successor has, at the time of application for an amendment, a continuing controlling interest in development or managemW of uses wit In the Planned Community Zone. W? Ordinance No 94 Page 9 0 SECTION 9 Review of Development Progress A. The Director of Community Development shall review each Planned Community Zone annually, and shall submit a report to the Planning Commission and City Council containing the following: 1. A summary of the development status within the zone and an assessment of progress during the year toward completion of development authorized by the Development Plan inc:uding adherence to development schedules and phasing. 2. A statement of any changes in land use and economic development trends, housing market indicators, cacmercial and in(!u,trlal development rates, or programs for provision of public facilities and services which, in the opinion of the Director, vary significantly from those upon which the Development Plan were based, and which could affect adversely continued progress toward completion of development within the zone. 8 A copy of the annual report of c.ie Director shall be provided to the applicant and to such other interested wparties or successors as deemed appropriate by the Director. Section 10 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk ss aTl attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (1 5) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Re� rt, a newspaper of general circulation published in the My of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _ day of ,1980. AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST 0 City Cleek • CITY a, RAN= c11CA.Y0.4GA MEHORMDUM DATE, December 19, 1979 To, City Council and City Manager FROHr Jack Lem, Director of Community Development SUBJECrr NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 79 -09 - A.MERSON - A change of zone from R -1 to R -3 on 19.11 acres of land located on the east side of Vineyard, between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. Arnold Anderson has requested a change of zone from R -1 (single family residenttal) to R -3 (multiple family residential) on 19.11 acres of land located on the east aide of Vineyard south of Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit A). The applicants intent for the- request is for the eventual development of a 140 unit mobilehom park. Preliminary site plans for the park has beer, submitted by the applicant for staff's review and comment. Because the zone change is intended to provide a mebilehome park development, the request for the zone change was found exempt from the residential moratorium since mobilehome parks are exempt from the moratorium. • The Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 28, 1979, hold a public hearing to consider the above request The minutes of the meeting and final action is attached for your review The Commission Voted 4 -1 to recommend approval of the zone change to the City Council. One Commissioner felt that there was no assurances that the applicant could not change his intentions and develop a mu -tipla family development other than a mobile home park. However, since this zono chant'• could not be approved and in effect prior to the expiration of the moratorium, any pro cased development other than a mobilehme park, would be sub]ect to the Growth Management Plan and the provisions contained therein Planning Commission Resolution R,. 79 -71, wt- ch was adopted by the Planning Commission and which recommends approval of Zone Change No. 79 -09, is attached for your review. Tha General Plan designates the westerly portion of the project site, fronting on Vineyard, as Nisod Use and the remaining portion of the site is designatea " high density residential (15 -30 units per acre). The surrounding zoning and lane uses are as follows, Zoning Land Use North R -3 Vacant Rest A -1 Vacant South R -I Vacant East R-1 Single Family Residential The q- ,t,oct property is large enough to accommodate was permitted in the proposed zone. In addition, was permitted in the proposed zone can be developed to be compatible and consistent with present and future uses in the surrounding area As required by State Planning and Zoning Law, the zone change request is consistent with the City adopted General Plan. n /11 Part I of the Lnitial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investiga- tion. No significant adverse impacts on the environment were found as a result of this project. Therefore, the Planning Commission bas recommended the issuance of a Negative Declaration. This item has boon advertised in the Daily Report for public hearing and notices have been mailed to all property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECCXOUNDATION, The Planning Commission recommends City Council adopt the attached ordinance approving the issuance of Negative Declaration and adopting Zone Change No. 79 -09. a Jack I&. Wr'Obt� Community Development JL,MV,cc Attachments, Vicinity Nap Land Use Nap Part I Initial Study Resolution No. 79 -71 • Planning Commission Minutes from 21 -78 -79 Meeting Ordinance J /�o A A ZC -79'09 - ANOEFisot`i Vir—INITY MAP F v �t.yle c..:lY Tr.er) � -1 N _ t. I 1a/ r Ex►+Irsl �&, r (VA"mr) C (.C---) (V.ca�r) CVu.aT� (Vaca..v) (Vac Y ^T) N ZC '79-09 :AND USE MM' M-L cXll1QCf 'lls /L C, L' 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Pee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Davelopeent Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will 'meet at:d take action no later than ten (30) days before the public meeting at which time the projr,ct is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations; 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or • 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant gi-ing further information concerning the proposed project. E PROJECT TITLE: � xt ,, r p CNANC£11-07 APPLICALI"S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _[7f� Ni 17n, I>. +•�S,•i J N, t-(fL ///] fl fl7� [.'.(!'!a ,''f, ( /?J_ LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: P3 X_) i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SOUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: , 13 Z'_nr•\ 4B, [, 1n' f7 T.'r _ .•e.,r $,. rr. p. ,.r. • DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SFTTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, VSE OF SURROUNDING PFUPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)) nA. (r ,r Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series cf cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant onvlronmental impact? l�LI z -2 s IMpDRTANre if the project involves costructiontof residential units, complete n form on next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the date and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, ,nd that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. i further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted Develevaenc before an adequate evallation can be made by the Review Committee. i Date L!" i -�'' _ Signature n.. ici ♦. r/ 42 Title •'..:.nt2A "• i Nfhid jbS �i WILLWILL TIII�° Y' • YES M Create a substantial change in ground contours? ° 2. create a substantial change in existing 7 ..�5... hoiso or vibration! create a substantial change in demaand for municipal services (police, fire. water, sewage, etc.)! d. create changes in the existing zoning or �-• general plan designations! i 5: Remove any existing trees! How many? _y 6. Create the need for use or disposal of hazardous materials such ad potentially toxic substances, fla:mnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 'f!, �• • ` '? - "� "-Y — IMpDRTANre if the project involves costructiontof residential units, complete n form on next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the date and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, ,nd that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. i further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted Develevaenc before an adequate evallation can be made by the Review Committee. i Date L!" i -�'' _ Signature n.. ici ♦. r/ 42 Title •'..:.nt2A "• i Nfhid jbS 0 RESOLUTION NO 79 -71 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIHO COMISSION RECCH.HERDINO APPRCVA'.. OP ZONE CNAHGF NO. 79 -09 REQUESTING A CWJLI- OF ZONE FROM R -1 TO R -I FOR 19 11 ACRES Or LAND LOCATED ON TILE EAST SIDE OF VINEYATP, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 208 -241- 02,11 WREREIC, on the 2nd day of November, 1979, An application was filed and accepted Ln thn above described project, and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of November. 1979, the Plannlnq Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code SECTION 1, The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commiza/on has made the to!•owing findings, 1 That the subject property is suitable for the Lees permitted in thn proposed zone In terms of across. size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding areal 2 The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the serrocnding proper tied and 1 That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the proposed General Plan SECTION 2, 7h,veancto Cucamonga Planning Commission has found the, this project will not create a significant adverse irspact on the environment and has recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration On. November 28, 1979 NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. That pursuant �o Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code. that the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga hereby rocomxn4s approval on the 26th day of November. 1979 of Zone Change No. 79-09 2 The Planning Commission hereby rscocends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change Ho 79 -09 I That a Certific4 Copy of this Rosol,tion and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the Caty Council {� APPRV.M AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEIBER, 1979 164 r n f PW4Mn7G COMMISSION OF THE CITY Or RAUCNO CUCANOO.,A I, JACX IAN. Secretary of the Planning Commission or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Was duly and regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular mating of the Planning Commission held on the 18th day of November, 1979 by the following vote to-vits AYCS, CON4ISSt0"ERS1 DANL, JONES, TULSTOY, REMPEL HOFSs C0IWISSIOtSRSs GARCIA A95ENft CC MISSIONEASs NONE /a i n U 11 A PLC.N IRf. aprms.ON nin, -.. NO'.F. MM 23, 1971 NEGATIVE DECCARA"O AND ZONE CNNiGC IN. 79-09 - ANDERSON - Zone Chango from R -1 to R -3 for property located on ehe east aide of Vineyard, mouth of Foothill Assessor's 7arcal No. 200- 241 -02. 14. Harry Hogan, senior Planner, relir.ud the staff report in detail. Staff reco®ands that the Commission adopt rll8e7 htton No. 79 -71 recommending approval of Zone Change No. 79-09 to the City Council. Chairman Rempel asked for quaevinns from the Commission of the staff. There being none. Chairman RWPel opened the public hearing. Mr. Hogan stated he would like to add for the record the reason the zone change to R -3 is !wing heard at thin time in because it In the applicant's intent to develop a mobilehome park on the site. Staff determined that be ^.aura of this intent and due to the fact that the zoning will not become effective until after the moratorium is lifted that it is quite proper to hear this zone change At this time. Thera being no questions from the Commission, Chairman Reapel opened the public hearing Mr. Arnold Anderson, applicant, stated he is voty pleased with the staff report and he is looking forward to the development of a mobilahome park. At this time he is not sure whether he would like a rental park, condominium or subdivision park. Mr. Guerra stcted this zone change is to R -3 which could also allow multiple family development He would not object to a mobilehome park but is very much against the development of apartments in this area. is Chairman Rompol asked if it is correct that there are no provisions for a condominium mobilchome park at the present time. Mr. tan stated because of recent interest in developing condominium mobilehome parks, the City at the present time is looking into Chia. At staff level, he would not have any opposition to a condominium park. we will be developing an ordinance for Commission review at a later date. Chairman Rempol noted that Any development proposed will have to be reviewed and approved by the Commission. There being no furthor comments from the audience, Chairman Rempal cloned the public hearing Comisslonor Jones stated there !a a need in this City for lower cost housiag and it is bar opinion this zone change to R -3 should be granted. Commissioner Tolstoy agreed this community needs to Lava some ability to provido low wst or lower cost housinq. This gives us a good opportunity to do that. Commissioner Dahl stated it is his opinion this area is very conducive to R -3 zoning, and would be the best use for the area. Thera is a need for higher density development in this City. A motion was mado by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Jones to adopt ® Resolution He. 79 -71 as submitted. M PLANNING C4MISSION MINUTES NUMBER 28, 1979 Commissioner Garcia stated the critical Issue that he sees in granting this zone change is the fact that legally the applicant can Como back AM present whatever project he wishes which could mean an apartment development. There is no provision to res'., ct the applicant to a mobilehems park. its is also not too sure that he agrees that this is the proper location for a mobllehome park. This is a high traffic movement eras. He stated It is his opinion more research is needed prior to granting a zone change for this area. Hr. Hogan stated basically the reason behind staff's recommendation to go multiple family in this area is the fact that south of Arrow is Otis Elevator industrial complex with more industrial to the south of `hat facility. Mother reason for high density is that it is close to the industrial ema and provides housing for the workers. As far as the development proposed, this would be better addressed at the time of development plan submittal. Chairman Rempol stated as far as the traffic situation, this is a better location for a mobilahome park than on a small residential street. Commissioner Garcia stated there is a tremendous emouet of vacant land In the area and this development in the middle really, in his opinion, is not the best Perhaps when development plans are submitted for the site, it will satisfy his concerns. ChairmAn Rempel called for the question on the motion. AYES, DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOy, RENPEL NODS, GARCIA ABSENT, NONE • • 16 F ORDINANCE No. 96 AN ORDINANCE OF TIM CITY OOONCIL OF THE CITY OF ' RANCHO COMMA, CALIP0.01IA. REZONIING ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 208- 241 -02. AND 14, PROM R -1 TO R -3 ON 1-3.11 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VINEYARD AVEMU SOOT)N Of FOOTHILL BOULEVARD THE CITY couNNCIL or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN AS PONI.ON3, SECTION 1, The City Council hereby finds and determines the following, A. That the Planning C,mission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommended the rezoning of the property hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of Lla City of Rancho Cucamonga. f • C. This rezoning will have no sir !Scant adverse environmental impact on the environment as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2, The fallowing described real property is hereby razoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly. R -1 (Single Family Residential) to R -3 (Multiple Family Residential). Said property is located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue approxi- mately 700' south of Foothill Boulevard and known as Assessors Parcel Nos. 208- 241 -02 and 14. SECTION 3, The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED thin day if___ . 1980. AYES, HOLE, A ABSENT, a 116 MAYOR ATTEST, CITY MxRr &wd Of Inulm 'CENTRAL , `;- t.1..6aue,. ie,* ftewd"I D.b f. JppHsr. Cat � Thamert Shen,ODS- lredwr �, �1 /''/T� UCHOUL �DrSTRICT j;, u 9..4161. w,;eh1.A,rm6r. C171LDRE}1 0;... et ALLOWED Nwm.. C Gbh. Ed 0. Uprr n,rna00 John A,Mgar•Amaimt SxpcannnarM 9457 Foolhill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, Colifornia 91130 Tel. 714.989.8541 December 13, 1979 City of Rancho Cocamun9a P.O. Box 753 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention, City Council The Central School District has attempted to Bret with representatives of the Building Industry Associatlon, Baldy View C apter@ and representatives of the William Lyon Company as requested by the City Council at the Novetabsr 7 meeting. Unfortunately, the Building Industry Association and William Lyon Company have repeatedly refused to met and dismas the issue of developers' fees under SS 201. The Central School District has carefully studied the Lnfoesrtion presented to the City Council by Hr Ron Willis, Business Indust y Association, in An attempt to develop rationale for a reasonable fee based upon the provisions of Government • Code 65970 to 65978. The Central School District is willing to concede that the growth in student an- rollmnt experienced in September, 1979, was due, in pert, to raturnons from private schools due to the elimination of double sessions Hwaver, enrollmat has incriased, and will continue to increase, as a direct result of the develop- ment of recently approved, or to be approved, dwell.ng units, The Central Sehml District interprets Government Code Section 65974 to mean that the fees paid 'should bear a reasonable relationship to the needs for schools caused by the development.- In referring to a letter to the City Council from the Building Industry Association on November 7, 1979, Kr. Willis indicates clearly that the original number of building permits, 238, would produce 143 children. Mr. Willis further states correctly that five classrooms are needed to house the 141 students. However, Hr. Willis grossly underestimates the cost of five class- room set up with utilities, furniture, and equipment at $43,000 each. During fact finding committee meetings in the Spring of 1979, it was incorrectly estimated that portable classrooms cou'd be installed for approximatuly $43,000 each In actuality, the costs to the Central School District for four portable classroov installed on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus are enumrated on tle follwing page. CENTRAL SCHOOL 'UG MON" IUNIOt NIGH SOHOOLI ` I DOHA Mitao SOIOOL VALLE VISTA SCHOOL 7955 Archibald Am 7611 Haft a. Ave. 10333 polo Alto S,. 7727 Valle Vino Od" TeL 714-987-2541 Tel. ?M9107-1788 Tat 714. 990.1600 TeL 714 -98; -8697 �A City of Rancho Cucamonga December 13, 1979 Page 2 Four classrooms per bid 0 $44,989.70 . Necessary Installation, S179,9S9 • Paving Electrical S,)73 Fencing around transformer 10,488 362 Fire alarms Clocka and bells 300 Plumbing 2,200 6.000 Furniture 24.723 TOTAL 81332 $213,014 The fifth classroom to be installed will frost approximately $56,922.70 and is enumerated as follows, One portable per bid 0 44,989.70 Necessary Installation, Paving 3,750 Electrical 00 _ Plumbing 3, 2,6600 Clocks, bells, fir, alarms _ 500 9,850 Furniture TOTAL _ 2,083 56,922.70 Please note that the installation of the four portable classrooms plus the addi- m necessary due to the increase in students • tional portable classroo from the 2l3 homes results in a total expenditure to the school district of $269,936.70. In retrospect, the fee should have appropriately been $1,134 for each of the 238 homes However, $94,432 has been collected from the 104 homes that have already drawn permits, leaving 134 homes yet to draw permits The total "at of $269,936 less the amount collected, $94,432, divided by 134 dwelling units establishes a $1,310 fee required to raise the necessary $175,504 for the project. T c Central School District to withdrawing the O" ginal request for nine double - wide modular classrooms to provide housing for students who bear no reasonable relationship to new home construction. The Central School District hereby requests an increase in developers' feas to $1,310 per dwelling unit to be applied to the remaining 134 dwelling units in order to Provide school housing for those students resulting from the development. Sincerely, Noreen C. Gulth, Ed. D. Superintendent NCG, vs 11 0� • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lauren H. Wasserman, city Manager PROM: Robert E. Dougherty, Assistant City Attorney DATE: December 11, 1979 RE: Bicycle Licensing Resolution. f` Enclosed please find the Bicycle Resolution for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Vehicle Code allows the use of eithea ordinance or resolution and my preference is a rosolu- J tion in all areas wherein we have a choico. The Resolution re- d quires licensing of any bicycle or motorized bicycle which in b owned by a resident of the City and operated within the City. i The Resolution must be read in conjunction with Division 16.7 of the Vehicle Code, copy of which is attached. Please contact mo if you have any questions. I 2 RED:sgg Enclosures VEnICtZ COD'S § 390CIE -� PSI Arowllln/ f6f11bfPPU0t4 of110G1= 1'� ••aM .11uIw0 b/�brl9lte0 tooUJord to 9oteteo tamm AO�1. x .11 s.� •• ^•+r r,bW s Sat mAUTAIAAd Io •mods lb0 of rf..1:aRR •.1... "'.'� Mnb e 1 IW1 P 4P1d. 'd) �,x w - t.t.Pl•4 . Division lti7 RCGISTRrBIC AND CLBS [NEW] SDdG OF .Y•s I.ne11Ye. 1.x U...M ..d rcrlrinlUA term+. Y.^ I ..,. P.I.ItttrcAb nelAtle[LL ►r6 w.t. is...Mr - t•.• t. a • }.q :.twwMWE mm11tJ YPeY Rbtt NtR Y. .r..l n0lttf. kf Y.• Iw•N.t" et Inmbnet AddMa doPitntA Itnn.A at nfttrKl°R Y.• ...'Iw1YA of tills. l eNlwm o tt sod Ik+YR U n 1 w mIfIbR x v.^IN...O[ for •Y,,wm L urt®fnt lN`*l blrrtk% IitemiOi ltd lrit. I S..ryHrf. AY .... IRT w, wd h s"WRIA. AI, P. ..� �•f n:1 f'R.e. AseNd h snsa fAte..ttlr Of bryelA .• t:ie.R r1M. 11 8tAW1H,a,'.9gLtP.It/6 W.R Igo. II. YAI rrMY.r 1 L ...nb OIL e.fII.R ISM1 r."It"rF. V,ItMllb tuxroom .f tbb dl"M orAR1 u b ODoo ablti .\ Prn lrm et bltw tt . In �...w .sue n x+ODtIW h LvmAO Po.er lin0i b At IMat •.11 i[rb.a In .•... e..l.t MIe., na m UIN nimU (e04 of rileb or Uflag Mt= •....M • •1 er brY.r . frfmA aW OI At Iwt Ir IACb.s. . t..l. �L = W& A--aed IT w..�[ n r �I.l P�sm I11: ZUUJ913. G =0. V. L^P. 14: Eb419M a aYL P Iat l.at l.e.lY...b.n �. n .I IIbu.11iL c xb. R tU. ItrA...w•Y 0. `MY xxMAQ, Wd Lf W.1.. Y_r.h Ylr..M VM le(Yl.lvn Y.s. iR..f.n�n 1x..NYst I.IM.n.. •.e... a.xYr ..nul®1.y m .1. ttR. e, tIL� ..IM1i nP..l.r os Rulama a + ✓�w� N T ..w .e.wu u i ul.Y�.+.ebe Stu. 11. .set" I110 am. W Mf ..4W SIM 1 L I... w 16.. tM .i MWt w ruulm a t1iL w �. rM. M!M[Y...• M I xJt..n .eteM..n. bYrtY �..ee.0i uW... A1.1°'°Nnn �Oldt. 1 l at .a OOWw W U�R YeY. �.�..... M let0. w ,".eMLL.Nto pIWfY. m.F x YSI. LW.t, ur n.lnnitn ISMS bnoy ItdidA Attl I.AIiM• Wa7 Pleean mod dYtnbe's btt7d* A elgw L&,4 em14 .• tM . N 11 dt" bAd ..USA wild ban ar AdOPt A+wOb • • • mi,,S A bYl1aAA by Amnhut Isl § 39001 VEHICLE CODE a.me ar n lutlon QitkL and month[ [ball II.p Ito lhilla' and nei.Y.two form distributed by the drwrtmevt Lo Oanr. of an) arw bicycle aWCb 1. Gist wed of 0, after • • 11ey»mb1 w Ip:- Ila. dcwaml u[ fell, cwrve aril collect a tm not to ..... d the cwt W procuri.g "it dV[IIDUt1ng the limns, Imbeu and nLl.in110a isms, for earl bilylle Ilnaae IOdlem and mcmiatwn tubs issued All I. rWIIrIN Wnwd to this option hall be drpoeried 1. as Slate Weigle IJmwe std Ileauflatlov fund nhl,h Is home, treated Then I. bib, tonumwwir $p Dnptlated from turn fund Lurb ..span as determined by the blmcnr of ?Iesnr4 N u an ended by the JrDmetm,hl to dcfny Isle b 9 ac as and distribute the bicycle AL IImR ledlrla and ree1•feausn form. The dinrwt •hall dmjg lbe Chicle I,Rwe Wide and registration farm one •� "ban •sublleb Dramdum tel the dutilbuuvo of filth Idku and rezwranan farm to titles and muvues Such ,"IYN Lball be Ld,mim. JanWa rleYDF and of a it aloe to permk It m W a111sW to tM flying at the real tut of the laryele frame Each Initial shall hear a Umdae Jim.;. ...We and .,all he pm-rnnlil aYlvemtl n a Dicleh Edci ngYlnOan farm uaS comply with Malatl xi a 81gc4 Ilnou, ehsll b mewed pWfoemlr throughout Ito state • • • an JLnesp I of the bled mar fsllawivg the rear of "ISM,lim to mega Janusr/ 1 3M IVpew.1 of a b»ytle • • • stab b Indicated by a •upplahtnlarr, ad- heane dean afflied • • • parallel to shift abnn or blow the judicial with so Dlratlan date shown ;F (Added Or huralb :l a pit. A :VIS 1 Z. Omi off Sipe :11, t61.l AmevdW by Suite 1'173. a Ise p 3411: Suililgr3le. =Wli,=0. /1) rattler eeHlml trial WJM by i1LY Ut! IY. : I,0. 1 I•uaa I. toms LINary MenM.s rip• to by slauulL. ` III •Ihn .a A.1 -1,nn p11 1 " Y Us.1.ruue l 93 .1 sm. p 1 ,IDOL LILI41. nPlnmutY 'ISlaOesa lab It a city at mutt? half or r apes • blgrle ]]mail,, ordinavn ar re•oluaon y m rrlldrut .WS I ante any bit". fin[ sold es • . Wgrle In k.w.ei . an or 1 .net • • • g3. pmarbr LO, INN. d an, aunt, road. Withwp. or other public j Dropral nthn the luritlltdoo of •arb dl) at moat, stales; each Wq<le Y It j RnaW m amord.. nth this dulYan MI An, Wgtk no[ auhlrcl Io tie pnaapm of this dnblo0 mar M addulanap, ! nNYtN a1 Ilnp»d pUnUOat W 1-1 oedlnlnn or m0, he llmn»d No count I of this, a.., it I" It I• 201awlul for say leM1- W tastier wilt it •fen) ..,,let, rim alter ..l fit IOJI[ls or InlgrYwe to". or 1. (.bask .111, car mullah the »nab hum her ue n ~f, coo garb of a basso( aD car)• Nenhlnve •rminl ,m aria L a,U _ Tp»d UadfrlM pm.l•lnw Of tll•dniting } 4I, a Ira, r pa p :coo 1 s marr n lept x. ID:- AmepdW by Su c A%P +1 .O Stats.1-M L It p OBI.I U ; rs• walso 'read Mird by 3IL1. 1 1 , 1ne Is I.... Lines, W"asm frTllnns•• a •� u n p• ed 01 btabil"L a Asleaublln bD flOew•nni rF—.1 emit. 91111. add" CI I 11.1 r -.asks to IM If 411 aVV iLllr IW s iYL Il = r 3.L 1 19001. I.raaat$'1 to ... Us egd rill,ir.f :sg f.rm. If • all O1 tpuat, as, or adorn • Wgr1, hrena.g orulOaDT or a'v,lullOV. Iv dlae and • mpl -I IM reamr.11Oh tom Obtain, tmm the drp.rir,mt shall b IAYryI to Ibe p... r Df •b af) Or mU01r or Other IlnnrlOt'year, dr mcgs W by It (Added by Mat4l Wf v D:I. p br_ll. 1 3. urgri ell Sept 31, 12: Amtnlhd Df Slab 19:. a 1h9 p uC. 11 SYLLID:S. r L. D=1 Ipl 411 l rbr r mr; —'1— tins •ford ter 11.1. Lwnp nM1nMn to • I LI I n. err• �• rv1paMa Or O Y AulanMlM. pll 11 OY L 111 na a.lr l r CJ n 9.,.r \,like 11 b $1, by of am llde111e. 1- 1111-141 chase.$ or deities, a, am'.dmret 182 1 15 g 39006 VEH1['LS CODS .• 1 Dyppl, root by etdlwaa w ;rwmtfot. may adapt Glace a 6N at+11 itiafa,— to- Moth T1eb r the ai aRia" Gad may b e Sad far tall tw rtla1M a to teefiL /bru for d b talltlba et I1aeo +r mmef aaA bl telalaN by tall �l�0111y aafe4 pa7N atdmaeta ta0rettd abatl be wad to IIDDrtrt esrbaa tree _ _ w...lr taeflltlw. toldadb{ bk7d4 path+ Gad laarr. mitWn rta la 0 L itiae. tw+ >_blotb Rasaae or restotlal' ad) Tar r— I�w wDradA Dy ]ear• 2M 1 a arsencl. a If!` - _ .. tACded by tStrulD7� 0 0u'am. L—AP. - smtll9fy. t 181 P, suu we•mr•• � IIIL rl {t11I n�DnT It.. L�w� -•nom b{y wt!I rt Pi rwrlrN r•.a Waa oa. .na rt- V wMe e/ tuu1116 •. OIL P "M 1 a 1 91091 Itef•Na ardival" er teretotlbat tot be tall' ptlra and tmettm banes a LtO "D Saab wry SW ladasa. Ibe ms tFM •It'd wead Iltetw pnimbto Wa armal a ®w b at fba bael" mad • • of tb Olgdw Gad lb ealw and addrm p( teOarL a. ,W at to Il aP • Rolled++ball b lots mlll�tetltlt+u lam t the dbt4et• Is m mesr wel' at Iw 11mwt or • • • — eCL am, M 1971 AlwadN by anted. 2M 1 0. eriearr (Added by 9taut9lt. &Ill. P DN.1s: eutw19M,,IrA.PSn1.f cuuI971.t 1s1.P Bare lA fuLL pw M1ml•r •.calla+ Steal a ala Uar•rf aa as iZ.1 N 1111 e11 • IwL I I1.rr wrN� AVet�•ea„Delar •t M� ' Ism a W. w 11{y 1� r waZ m a OIL wra wu rtwal•a s plrL LaaN qli. 1 a e 9mwlbwr T•Lna,StewI y p•upei a IIIL F ptL 1 a •Mall &all nbawf 1 11090. lalarrnatlea eeeelM N tal caeb bte7tM rttaller atd weber �ad tbaR meladr. m ro: rIw ar cab ((Hart( facDp et the tdb�lti btormalim: prtrnUlntlaa teem Dm ocr, { wrlal u:H teN•I[ er; R Blom to tar DeRLa etc �� et lw blQtia. _ wme •t fetallrr. awrl+a at reltller. yra rtpawf It at enembatted� w rot tomkr at lb blgele If dellrtrtd l0 cab m lJ L. Amended by T•enw waUw rww. Soot b Slam LMr/ rt: ^••r calm, t wl r. ueL O L -EY alb vp�yr 1 cat M wee rewt u Iw +1.414 . �YLLlOa c 714 P mar. 1 L amaadA.M Aebrmae • • • Ialban UMllwa ay 163 § 39007 VEHICLE CODE 13m?. ums1 •owatn - After Dreeni 91. • • • 17.0, ah Weak Rtelkr mull all an7 eew In tale tut' upkw mb Wpe1e hn 1tIW7 ead peramanUy ttampra nr eao v from' a wtitl notable' to kv nip taealaan'nob In \Ire. 4nd YOWue lu 11. tkvlu y 1pe of ate mep utt 7p'e Nw rlu • cru mb• ml, re I o• I oatnmw er tm t In n' , pat e! Ibe f nme i de t-PUW. or lb bottem tprottet • • • leroatl Leon M& (Ad,fed by Slats i, a on. P' 01 / 3 alTetry, eat. Sept :q 1771 Auoe q Suta1V71 a 16A P p4L 17 unlal C3. a 1 -"'0.0. �' 10.) lbnrwr •eetlael twm dew 4 alto 1wi e. UL a IeL 1 1 poet it, wmm- Lltroq Mtnrno :Y M�tb ," tiu oil o i 1. � »uv i rT c l.Y. U.. �itllrwr 1 tLr: ra _ - i 9900L MuNatlu of tnuf4 Ill tt2ogrer • • • [011 — er0e or othlrwUe dlrpaee\ at Wp.• tptA • • • ad'oye W0"F-Fynp Rrtlrl -te pnelnm, leveed fn, Wptk a writ% Innvfer at nmf. Medea romp the prove ldJ7R "wiiiae. r y trtunr, ld ttenelue, of the o the I(ah'feRl, den w tmpNrrnl AV., er.4- debtor tb ee(Itlbbaa Rnlflnlq n Iadatied. to tM IIROLtj t[enq r it (DI Any perap who IwnLuet ar olherwlee am011n ptearstlon of • Wptk .� within 10 day, of tams Daoo,"t etoy for the [router of 11"U., to W. 71 ntml. Often .PI t ul. m4 e'nw" rvin and Rewatbet in forrrA aL forte the pro, W ape of into wetim y tAddw by Sttn107L a 771, p : M 131 anr1217. off Sent :0, 1974 Ame,� Sn4i7:S,e 15$0.54116 9n419.& lt1.:gp0�110.1 - 7an>r ee<tl.a Iwtt .w dd e7 aula lilt o &IL a 111. 1 I uunt ve rIW- "nrr nrrn «o 1kn. wourd 4 staullT p bL p +Igp•alk• OLII rev l6 LIL=V 31lnllvrl ben r eerr 7e..mr ee<tion Ma Lida n• it 4muun c 13" P rru l a - 79009. k 1111catb\ of thug of tddnst; d\'Ikate liontt v n /lltntln h- (91 tt-bgRr the owtn at a WM* IIRp2J pen, at to .n aralp]pR ar n• tmn rot it dt' or eanut7 ehanae. W' tddn'L W Nsn whelp 10 day, Wily e W 9eo0rnit bunt a atepp of the old uJ pew addre'a /D) In the !rent that toy hipek IIRaro tpDela at mtstntiov form IS, \etat to the pmvltlots of Mt. dllm" 1. Intl Noko or mubttllJ, t0.! ji, \urh Wtyel. x0.11 ImoveOrttlll rukf7 the Iltepelvt nerap. op:, tntnn 11' v after enn wilrintlda. !hall LrO" to n! btovLVd \rode) for • Jvpllnle Dn "SdIH\ e1 rtrletntl0h forte )bnutg4 in, IIRp\I!j lbaq n \II O.U. to 1 ORa rt t nplrRallCl ladltl\ or RtytRUOa farm nw, ro7meat to ttl! lire - \Leap Of Ib .mropent' felt (Addw by Slats 107E O 071, p �"1. 1 3, OlLlnn, err Se9L ZD. 1774 Ana Sut1101e16q P54410 Snta7Tie 1 0,P9'^.I ILI Farmer Iet1m "oft wdw m 3,.m Iw: "It o -_It 1 L nwtte, •. N• n. LIMrq ntmwnt haul N dnblm Ili a be A.InMWk•aflll penY1.1 w I e.rmMe. 14. Slim CJ n M.I. I..1to 114.1 r0.. by S.tLll7L c II37, 1 =L I L 1 99010. E.1111.1 .wnutn ud IIInR. (u "Y e1.7 ue mop wbitb hat • Wmk beret, a ow1uOR or molutlop la " feet < • Aemrmbr b. 1071. Ihot[ only mntnoe uad.t each emin... rnalutlm for • period 0.n nRlVlet mr lltr ream U.94,11lu ndireln ebtp' o addtlbo by tntedwr•1 184 1 "� td &or VZMCLS CODS $ 39118 W u ord3um or IelWaeee (a) city or 8 M o rich ta to of ect Imseld - -• �fl esber 70. 1971 Wag vessels y of i N a er coach' • t4. 1-w then [1 nIW mW Ibelr uY[s`d .ipint a daW. bat u en en. ' jjt L 1979. 1014. Amended by (Aldo b 8taLL1071. a 97L P 703L i A. arin4. eK SeDL 74 Stat41073,t IS3,P6µ110; Bfata1973.a17S4P7773.1 �% U.nry nlmM.. C Cy.=U = \.YYm 11 K tL 771011. FIRM U0111404A or eraolotlm, arblch ta No (Ine Inwood for tar .Ielatan of m aylNnW admled tmemaat W this dl.lua. Sun "emd 8n dollars (113). (Added by SumI07e, L 9N. P 200L 14 arPW- tM Sept 2M 1974') Uarey r.r` . YnpN1iN Grpr.11am d. I RI at ... t:sj, Yea n Coaa dt M ,MIL tsNa.es.at for rlelatba of tali fbe tlmalef revery Web ban the state to Linwood and estate woarolon et 1n7 Wgnw a eat l th at o woo fe.4leea" at this dl.tdm am metalled wU& In Wddldb and =MY WAIII .f such N4tk mull lM lroralsns t to seeps° 59011. - a 8m mar ea Ire rood for any rbtatlne of tbk N.lalsol 9anam (Addrd by StatLl= a 1734 P 37x7. I "I e«tr INn u "deed N 3t I1M q tin �. I1� IR. P nn 1 IL -u ....rod 1 Ion P(0. be taLLlffe. L 1071. P ones 114 1 7!011 1461114811 81111110111 LloaJa! Rets"" 'tz The wrs.hlews of fall dL.Wm am amlleabil to socialized block _ (ybttottU I x1917. added by Bta1L1WS. a 157. P 1177; l 10. Rmombersd 139017 and ameedd by Stsmin& t 1070. P 4&w0. 103J Division 16.8 LICENSING OF BICYCLES [REPEALED] sermon e1.ielee lu, rust no Sar11011. t 7117. P =eel 1 L dpw11N 1' her 1, 1111. tbYYls/ wl "now, 39100 to ns.A Net rr/rokt M 8aK 11161 h1. /7011.1LL/eap. ('!•Blois U. 1174 . r,-:: ..r '_ ^:• 7r TABLE _ t C The tabled mutter of the following ueetlom of former Division 18.5 is bow covered by now Division 16.7 as folio": Hear F.nY Seattle New 211010 X110 r S....a seen" 30100 ••••• - .•• 70007 X11003 3011 ...sees 7)101 -- >t 7:1103 .. ... ..None 39122 .. .7„0001 39101 Noes 77117 .. . .. -.. F Bold. 30001 301:1 b0" 70101 _ .80001 S9f1 ..........None zt 31107 .Nom 571166 ..... .. .. ... .Nca '• 30107 .lima 50117 .. -. -- -50011 -� .. .2iem 19175 sees . 14. 39100 .. • -.•• -77001 •••• 3710] .. D 3SISo le tar 1L RINaled by 7tatL197e.1171. P 7071. I O..rNsey..n. Se /L 74 me Ta. NN+Iy .silo, eddy W M ��T�u!r..WI tf n4 is m. tTt L NIL 111\ r1.4iM a tlp�.i j--= J.V 4 Mr1O° ilea)) a tuna Its ° � ~u aw AtlNkb • • • Itekal. Mottles by uatal-l't 185 � • RESOLUTION NO. 79 -105 A RESO_ ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF .''ARCHO CUCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING 1HE REGISTRATION AND LICENSING OF BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED BICYCLES. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. hereby resolves as follows: SMION 1: The tern 'bicycle' as used to this resolution includes rotor z bicycle'. All words and phrases used 1n this resolution which are defined or which are used in the Vehiiie Code of the State of California shall have the same definition or cleaning as In the Vehicle Code. SECTION 2: Any bicycle which is operated by a resident of the City on any street, road, highway, or other public place within the City rust be licensed in accordance with the provisions of Division 16 7 (comencing with Section 31000) of the Vehicle Code of the State of California. SECTION 3: All of the provisions of Division 16.7 of the Vehicle CoUF—orW State of California, which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this resolution, are hereby adopted by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION 4: The owner of ray bicy%.ie required to be licensed by L6Ts resolution shall cause said bicycle to be licensed by the later of: (a) January 31 1980; b Twenty (201 days after said bicycle 1s purchased in the City by a resident of the City; or (c) Twenty (20) days after said bicycle is first brought into the City by a resident of the city SECTION S. Any bicycle which has been licensed by another Jurfsdiction- W- aTfiornfa, and which bears license tndicia conforming to that required by Division 16.7 of the Vehicle Code shall tj registered in the City by the later of (a) January 31 1980; or b) Tuenty (20) days after said bicycle is brought into the City by a resident of the City SECTION 6 Bicycle licensing records need Include only the infonnatron eluired by Goverment Code Section 39005 All bicycle licensing records shall be maintained by the Chief of police or his designated subnrdfnants 1� Reso'ution No. 79 -1 OS Page 2 SECTION 7: The regisrration of bicycles and the Issuance • of 'icenseTn3id"rxay be done by the Chief of Police or his designated subordinants, ary City employee designated by the City fianager and any bicycle retailer or bicycle dealer authorized by the City Manager Recordation of transfer and issuance of dupl4 ate licenses and registration forms shall be done by the City Manager or his designated zubordinants SECTION 8: The fees required to be paid for new bicycle license a n r�{stration certificate, transfer of registration certificate, replacement of a bicycle license or registration certificate, or for bicycle license renewal s�.be the maximams fees pp Mowed by Division 16 7 of the vehicle Code. "atc�.ti 4-cti 1ns I SECTION 9 All fees coilected by the Chief of Police or his des .lniFs-ubordfnants, or by other mpbjees of the City shall be retained by tie City and may be used for the support of this resolution or to Improve bicycle safety programs o� to establish bicycle facilities, including bicycle paths and lanes within the City SECTION 10: All fees collected by a bicycle retailer or by a blcyc el eler shall be remitted to City by said retailer or dealer SECTICN 11. Bicycle license records with respect to each license ssu y a bicycle retailer or dealer, or by any employee of the City, shall be delivered to the City within ten days following license issuance. Registration forms shall be remitted at the same time license fees are deii.ared to the City. • SEC710E1 12. Any person who violates any provision of this resolutions a fined the sum of Five Dollars (1;5.00) ATTEST PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1979. AYES NOES ABSENT City Clerk 1Z Yor • RESOLUTION N0. 79 -104 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO OFCBiCCYCLE LICENSENAND ALSO THEHRENEWALSTHEREOF. ISSUANCE WHEREAS, Division 16 .7, Section tthheebicycleeresolution provides that fees may be charged to support and bicycle programs: ty Council of the City VON THEREFORE be it resolved by the Ci of Rancho Cucamonga ls that ethhebfollowing fees for iseesgguance and renewal (1) the tri- annual license (S1.00)apernyeartoricate any portion thereof (2) For each transfer of registration certificate, the fee shall be one dollar (11 DO)- (3) Fortichreptheafee shall be c one dollars ($1r00)9lstratton Of a • (4) For each bicycle license renewal, the tri- annual fee shall be 50 cents (1.50) per year 1979 PASSED, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this day of — AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ayor AT, EST ty er Is 1;Z1 0 L CITY Or pARgiO CDCAKCUGA OATS, nacembor 19, 1979 TO: City Council and City Man8909 FROM, Jetk Lem, Director of CawunitY Csyslopmert SU=Cy, SCAG MWIVTI09 CH G.ROM FORECAST POLICY ABS7tACf, As the City C=cil is ;ware, we have COMM "fare You in the past £o- your conturrOnco through the adoption of A resolution oa ChroS� support ofathe p9CJG Aires was not at ,,ted by this Co•.mcii and for your concur _ _ aforlmenttiiooved Plan which was adopted by using S� 78 the Growth Forecast Policy sea Popula its guide At the ti w of the devaloi�ent of scm.78 Growth ran . Policy our planning staff joansd the deve!Opment Procve somevha` 'ate but in tim to O,•va the popul rig n fig'ues for Raneho CucaeOnga appropriately adjnst-d to accurately "elect P jhAtionabtoc 900 be the short tem projections for 1980 — 05, Our POPul am approxieAtely 5the r and for totottals for each city would notvbe PartaOfutl%G Printed staff mentors Cant the COP°1 c"ge On SCAG -75 bears this cut. dxUment. The attached in[ormational pa w° are wry cautions over racemendations of the use of SLAG -78 Growth Pore:aot iblicy as a major tool for the Projections of facilities afor rs-nte tai ewe the ccotrot° °o° best air quality. while w bolie•�a i[ is in the City wastewater facilities and good air quality- the UAG of SCAG -78 G_oweh FOrethe3 Policy as the mjor tool in the devbIOPmant of these plans and implementation Of these plans is unfair and would result in insocurate proj °� 29•wmtewatsr planning•#8- feel d e ms of the guides in the development of AgmD that it can be a valuable "sat in the total planning for L1aae facilities. Attached pleas° find sn inf'tmation package of SCAG-78 listing Questions that are It was Prnp typically seked regarding SCAG -78 end answers to those quastions aced by the SCA^. eCSfL. Also, pleue find attached propOeud Resolution for eeneurrenm viW C`,0 SCAG -78 Growth PorOeast policy. TL should be noted that ve have eodifi ad the model resolution that was sent to the City to ro!laet our concerns stated previouoly. ti on It is rococcanded that the regardin7 'h0 SCAr78 Growth Forecast policy pas UC submi tted, Jack Director of Comamity DOValcleent JL,8Y8,to City Council adopt the attacheC ResOlU on as delineated in the POAOlution. Attach, Infcreaticn package on SCOG -70 City Council Resolution O J 0 11 Attachment A October 25, 1979 1NFORHATION DOCKAGE ON SCAG -78 JKAT IS SCAG -787 Forecasts of population, housiiog, employment and land use for 1980, '80, 190, 195 and 2C00 the forecasts are by 55 Regional Statistical Areas and 35 sewer service areas HOW HOCH GROVfH DOES IT FORECAST FOR THE REGION BY THE YU1 2000' 3 1 million more persons or an increase of 30% 2 2 million more Jobs cr 48% WHAT ARE THE FORECASTS BASEO ON7 • Ass4-mptions of probable birth, mortality and migration rates Sub - regional distributions are ba.ed upon such factors as historical trends, known development proposals, amounts of available land and adopted local goverment and regional policies HC.! WAS SCAG -78 111ELOPED1 Local government forecasts were collected and totaled • Sim alternatives, including a sum of local government forecasts, here developed and analyzed Public alternatives anektooestablishh the tba sic eassumptions iand policies ss the for the new forecast. Jithin this framework, input •rom local governments was again sou,ht host large jurisdictions revised their original forecasts and submitted them for use in the new regional forecast. Draft STAG -78 was developed and distributed to ail the local governments of the region fur review and comment in August, 1978 Revisions were made, and it was adopted in Janiary, 1979 WHAT WAS TdE EXTFNT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATION? At every step of the process -- the development of alternatives, analysis of selection of and of a Choices were made by committees composed entirely of local elected officials ) 1-3 .p. SCAra -78 represents input made by many Jurisdictions including: Ventura County, Ventura County Association of Governments, Los Angeles County, Los Angeles City, Cities of Pasadena and Long Beach, Orange County, San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Association of Governments, Riverside County, and Coachella Valley Association of Governments WK, IS SCAG -78 USED FOR? • The sizing and funding of w,stewater facilities. • Forecasts of traffic as a basis for caking regional transportation decisions Forecasts of air quality as a basis for the Regional Air Quality Management Program. Forecasts of housing need as a basis for the Regional Housing Allocation Model (RHAM) The RHAM is used for local Housing Assistance Plans and for allocation of housing bonus funds A basis for A -95 Review of proposals A regional perspective to help in local goverment decision making. HOW OFTEN IS THE REGIONAL FORECAST REVISED? • Approximately every two years. Amendments can be mad, at anytime A Regional Development Monitoring System is being established to provide the most up-to -date data available for use in the revision process WHAT DOES SCAG -78 SHOW FOR MY CITY? In order to allow flexibility, SLAG -78 is adopted by 5S Regional Statistical Areas (RSA's) and not by city However, a draft Interpretation of the RSA forecast to cities is being prepared and will be sent to you as soon as available This will be Just ore of many possible interpretations of the RSA forecast to cities Cities and counties will be encouraged to work together to develop their own diiaggregations of the RSA total SLAG does not intend to adopt these city forecasts, but rather to encourage local goverment, to use them as technical aids and as a benchmarl within a development monitoring system. • RESOLUTIONS OF CONCURRENCE WHY IS SLAG SEEKING RESOLUTIONS OF CONCURRENCE WITH SCAG -78 NOW? As a condition for using SCAG -78 instead of the State's own forecasts, the State Water Resources Control Board has called for resolutions of concurrence with SCAG -78 from local Jurisdictions representing 90% of the region's Population by January 1, 1980 We believe that a good deal of concensus with SCAG -78 currently exists and wish to document this fact for the State We would like to better identify where disagreements exist, so that I. •se difference, can be addressed WHY SHOULD MY JURISDICTION ADOPT A RESOLUTION CONCURRING WITH SCAG -781 Without resolutions of concurrence, the State may force this region to use the "F -75" forecast, which Is approximately I million persons or 7: lower than SCAG -78 and shows 30: less growth -3- SCAG -78 was locally derived and it more closely follows local government plans than do the forecasts developed by the State • Amendments and revisions Can be made more easily to SCAG's forecasts than the State's SCAG is more accessible than the State and our committees are composed entirely of local goverment officials Projects which are consistent with SCAG -78 are also consistent with the growth assumption In the Regional Air Quality, Water Quality and Transporation Plans The red tape involved in obtaining state and federal approval for these Projects then should be considerably reduced. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR MY JURISDICTION IF IT ADOPTS A RESOLUTION OF URFEN The resolution is primarily an indicator for SLAG and the State as to whether local goverments plans and forecasts are truly reflected in the regional forecast By adapting the resolution, your Jurisdiction will help SCAG convince the State to use SCAG -78 for funding purposes rather than the State's own forecast The resolution asks your jurisdiction to cunclir with SCAG -78 for use In regional 1p ans. During the next few nonV.s we will work w�' you and your neighboring Jurisdictions to refine city forecasts which are both locally acceptable and consistent with the regional forecasts. These city forecasts would then be avr Table for city use and for use within a development monitoring syster. Also, in early 1981 we will be asking you' Jurisdiction to participate in a process to revise SCAG -78. Ids -4- HON DOES SLAG COMPARE TO THE STATES OWN FOR:CASTSl For purposes of funding wastewater facilities, federal regulations • state that if an area does not have ar, approved 208 plan, then the State must use forecasts which are within 5: of the forecasts prepared by the Federel Bureau of Economic fralysis. In response to these regulations, the State has proposer the use of the State's •F -750 Forecast • if the State uses F -75 rather than SCAG -78, less money would be available for constructing sewers and treatment plants This could lead to more state imposed moratoria on construction within this region F -75 is approximately 1 million persons lower than SCAG -78 and shows 305 less growth The table below compares F -75 tc SCAG -78 by county Population, Year 2000 Co_ unty 2 Imperial Los Araeles Orange Riverside San Bernardino Ventura Regional. Total State's "F -15 Forecast 122,000 7,388,400 2,579,S;r0 842,100 1,022,100 731,500 12,686,200 SCAG -7d 129,000 7,189,000 2,758,100 955,8o0 1,195,700 791,000 13,619,300 Difference 7,000 400.600 179,000 113,000 174,()00 60,000 933,000 2 0 Attachment O October 25, 1979 MODEL RESOLUTION OF CONCURRENCE WITH THE SCAG -78 GROWTH FORECAST POLICY Whereas, the SCAG -78 Growth Forecast Policy was developed with the participation of local governments; C. 1• , Whereas, SCAG -78 has been incorporated into the region's Air Quality Management, Wastewater Treatment, Housing and Tranportation Plans; Whereas, as a requirement for using SCAG -78 instead of State forecasts for the funding of wastewater facilities, the State Water Resources Control Board has called for resolutions from local governments of concurrence with SCAG -78; • Whereas, if SCAG -78 is not approved, the State may use its "F -15" Forecast -- a forecast which is approximately 1 million persons lower thin SCAG -78 and shows 30% less growth; and, Whereas, the SCAG -78 Forecast is revised approximately every twu years and amendments Can occur at anytime; Now, therefore, he it resolved that or sd ct on concurs with the use of the SCAG -78 Growth Forecast Policy for use in regional plans ,❑ Ir/ pl;SOIMION 79 -111 A RESOlOnott OP THE CITE COMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONGA, C -FORNiA. IN ODNGDRRZHCE WXTH THE SCAG '10 GROWTH FORECAST POLICY WKENMJ the SLAG -78 Growth Fotxast Policy wan developed with the participation Of lec+1 governventst and$ sCAG-70 has bnen lncorporated u • guide for the regions air quality management wastewater treatment, bowing &-A tr&"portatl en Plan. ands for Nyg,1P.ASI as n regttlrement tot the S ate W B instead of the state Board called the funding wastewater facilities, the Stets Mates with SCres7COnaeads Soak The raaolutions sare locrl governmante eoaeurtsta with SCAG- rely 1 million petsoos lowsr than SCAG -70 and shows 301, {}RERE75, if SGG':8 is not approved. the State may use 1U "P -75" forecast forecast which in approsima less growth, and? S, the SCAG -78 ra"C at any m t Sy revised appmaimatalY ovary two years and wHERBA ®endmsnts can orcur NON .�ALPORE� BE IT RESOLVED That the City GOancil of the City of qm ido for • Cuea.'aNOW, , core with the use of the SLAG -78 Growth Foreaeat Policy as n gold the we in regional Plans• PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPT ED thin day of AYES. NOES, ABSENT: ATTEST, City Clerk LI Nayor 1 t�V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 MEMORANDUM. DATE: December 19, 1979 TO: City Council A City Manager FRCh: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: AWARD OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONWCT - BASE LINE AND HELLWUi, APCHIBALD A140 CHURCH STREET (FAU) Bids will be opened on the above referenced traffic signal projects on Friday, December 14, 1979 The results of these bids will be analyzed and submitted to the Council prior to the December 19, 1979 meeting It is anticipated that award to the lowest qualified bidder will be recommended The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $125,000. Respectfully s Witted. i J Llo, Hubbs City ngineer LBH:deb t� U )A� E • MORANDUM Dms Decmber 19, 1979 TO. City buacil X7�/t,(w.t.✓ PROHs Lauren Nassercui. CitY Nenagar r sDdaezr, CAR acLa+aceCE FOR ssrzoR rraeno:n Ag --rp.A f. Tn thr prsparatim of the budget we ina mrtsotlY excluded the position of senior p_ avier from the car allwanre• The Senior Planner uses his car for City purposes in the dispensation of hie duties and should be compensated the ease as other managers Thera are foods available for this compansatiom• pgOC:4477DATION. It is recamsedd that M par month be allocated to the Senior planner for car aliwenea. 136 0 RESOLUTION NO. 79- 110 A •.LjourrIom OF THE cm COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPi'INC REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, MIAINING TO MAMtALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS THEREOF FOR THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY 07 TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980 WHEREAS, Section 10012 of the Elettlons Code of the State of California authorizes the governing body of any local agency to adopt regulations pertaining to mrterlals prepared by any candidate far a municipal election, including costs thereof. and WHEREAS, It is the opinion of the Attorney General of the State Of California (No. CV 76/5, May 6, 1975) that a candidate may not be billed for the additional cost of preparing candidates' statements in Spanish if such were not requested by the candidate but were required solely by reason of recent amendments to the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Public law 94 -73, August 60 1975); - KOV. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follons: Section 1: That in accordance with Section 22843 of the • Elections Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby determines that each candidate for municipal office shall at the time of filing, pay a fee of $25.00 to cover costs of processing nomination papers Section 2: That pursuant to Section 10012 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the Nth day of April, 198D, may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement may include the name , age, and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than two hundred (200) words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself. Such statement shall not include party affiliation of the Candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations Such statement shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not Changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period Section 3. That each candidate filing a candidate's statement ,hall. at the tine of filing said statement, pay a deposit of $175 CO to offset the estimated costs of printing and handling the candidate's statements Funds collected In excess of actual prorated costs shall be refunded within 30 days after the certification of the municipal election by the City C1erY / I� c am., Section 4: That in accordance with Sections 4015.5 and 5014.5 of the Elections Code of tha State of California, the City Council of the City of ® Rancho CuraarnRA hereb/ detormines that rebuttal arguments not exceeding 300 words may be aubmltted for each measure which will appear on the municipal ballot. Section 5: That in compliance with the recent amendments to the Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Public Law 94 -73, August 6, 1975) the City Clerk 131 shell proviJo a Spanish trawls i of he candidate'a statement to b; included • In the Voter's Pamphlet and maiaeJ with the sample ballot to each voter in said City Section 6: That the City Clerk shalt send to each voter with the sample ballot, a voter's pamphlet which contains the statement of each candidate in Englist- and Spanish, pursuant to law. Section 7: That the City Clark shall provide each candidate or the eandldato's representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued. Section 8: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the m'- tea of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, ♦PPOOVED and ADOPTl9 this day of December, 1979 by thu following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clark 1302 C-1 • RESOLUTION N0. 79 -112 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGI. CALIFORNIA. REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNkRDINO TO PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF COON" TO RENDER RELATING TO THE SERVICES TO OF A GENERAL MUNICIP L ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL B, 1980- Cucamonga a o General Mu B,n1980 laElection is to be held in the City Of Rancho WHEREAS, in the course of conduct of said election and +n relation thereto it will be necessary to providr the following tyterials: 1. Precinct index of registered voters 2 Combined roster index of voters by voting precinct 3. Data processing tape - for labels Clerk County will facilitate t e rnishesnthe City wi hhthesenmaterials ;fande and it WHEREAS, all necessary expense in performing this service shall be paid by the City of Rancho Cucamonga; NOW THEREFORE. Use City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby RESOLVE. DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows SECTION 1: That pursuant to the provisions of Section 22003 ia hereby Elect de if he state isarslofosaid�CountyCtoYPe mitil Of the conducting saidkelectionato be held onhAprilaS. 1980, for use to 1 Precinct index of regisstered voters ng Precinct 2 Combined roster infer labellers by voti 3. Data processing SECTION 2: That said Ci shall Imb^dsupo^id Coudution for services perrnrmed When the work is coniple to the City of a propa� Y approved SECTION 3 That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward without de ay to said Board of supervisors and to said County Clerk. each certified copy , 1979 PASSES. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Jay of AYES NOES: ABSENT ayor ATTEST: C LyCer pJ Da. ARMAM0 NAV.V" Ei"un Dualol 8" RWw Am S+n grmuduxti C>• 921G 714 - &9¢4349 Pl,03EC.T ESPERIL47A (ROPE) TO, City of Rancho CUC=Mla 0 001 2�`��n5�6 Pg'Tit Sub- Graotaa Project Pswanra 10071 Peron Blvd- Rancho Cuc&n0ng4. CA 91730 Pirae quaterly auttary to. Ort 1wrNant to Contract agreement Armando Ravarro I Executive Director 0 1230 L &h SL ootui4 Ca. 91764 714.9#34614 714983.2673 13? tkttu►mgrt A. s The following concerns the quarterly sum=nry report with regard to the first provision of contract as agreed upon by the City of Rancho Cucmonga I, and Project Psparenza (Hope). Recreation At the time of initiation of agreement in August Project Paperer a, then know k as Project Hoy, was sponsoring a summer recreation program for children aged 7 to 13. The Program was funded by a grant of $4,000 from Community Services Department and approximately SO children participated. ]rgasizad arts and - crafts classes were held four days a week{ field trips were taken once a week to amusement park*, the beach, bawling, etc. In addition, general recreation and games were organized in the center. The Program ended with a Junior • Ol7M?ic3 sports day in which children. from the two centers competed for trophies and gift certificates. (Project Hoy was at this time sponsoring a program in Los Olives in Upland.) The meat was held in a spirit of friendship and sports- manship and was exemplary of Project Psperanzala endeavor to seek a healthier relationship and environment a.cng the youth of the community it serves. Realizing that "creation by itself will not mitigate gang violence or meet the various needs of the youth, the staff has sought to create diverse approaches to dealing with the problem of juvenile delinquency. Vith the beginning of the school year, an after - school program was developed for youth ages 7 - a. The program offered tutoring in English, counseling, and general recreation and arts and crafts. An English class to be held twice a week and geared for high school 13 �' 0 dropouts was advertised. Both endeavors, up to this tine, have base unsuccessful in arousing participation. The reasons for this lack of participation are out - 1 lined in the edministrativo section of this report. presently, recreation for 3 s the older youths is limited to after school, when yourgeters cone and use what little equipment is available (ping pong table, weights, some boxing equipment, and a pool table). With the younger children (egos 6 - 8) intramural games have been organized between centers. In addition, they are hold on a regular basis among the children at the Qrcamonga center. An average of 30 children ranging from &gas 7 to 21 came into the canter daily. It should be noted that the sports equipment presently being used is practically unusable due to wear and tear. • R-aM-MRAL FOR SrWIM OR ASSTgrANCB Fart of project Espersa`afe effort on behalf of the con eity ban been the implementation of a consumer program whose objective is to mediato disputes betvaan consumers a-d businesses and cosatmer edu:atiou/prevention. The Program'a goal is to save the consumer $100,000 by year -end. Three vista r volunteorz will be assisting in this area. At thin time seven clients are being served. Two have already been rainbursed in monies totaling $10,000. f The program will seek to train community volunteers to help in the consumer i j education effort beiva made. In addition the project provides cltisons with C referral service and in many cues goes beyond actually serving as a mediator c for clients by making referrals to public agencies and private industry. This r is an important service when one takes into consideration that many of the f Project's clients are low income and find it difficult dealing with buracracies. F , On a monthly basis the center handles 20 - 25 clients with problems in the areas 71 iaaigratlon, workmen's compensation, employment, Valfsre Department, etc. Li Dozing the surer months Project Rope sponsored two work programs, SYPR and SYr , for youttu egad 14 - 21. Jobe ware given for a period of up to three months termr sting at the end of September. Pines September three individuals ages 20 - 21 have been placed with Schlosser and Forge, Goodrich Company, and in construction work. Considering the =bar of sigh school dropouts this is as area that needs further exploration and possible expansion. XYYIWY`u �xJ.y ' In addition to auperviaing the employment program the staff and counselor, FCnth Thompson, sought to augment the work experience by providing individual and group counseling. Various speakers were invited to rake preaaatations varying in subjects related to juvenile delinquency, such as sea eduction and • family and drug problems. In the ninth of November the project participated in the annual parade hold is Oueamongs. A trip to the library was made by 15 youths from the center. On December 15, the Reverend Castrejon of Soldiers of Christ , along with staff, sponsored a Christian rally at the Center. She purpose of the gatherinS was to gather people from the community to share in a day of spiritual reaffirmation. AD_UVESl'RtTION In analyzing the performance of Project Fapersozc'a goals, as agreed upon with the city, cartnin obstacles merit consideration. Firsts At this time we do not have a lull -time director providing guidar:o on seeking available resources. A proposal to pay for a Director has boon submitted to United Nay. There is ' no full -time recreation coordinator able to organize and mgnervize activitic3. YO • _ We have been waiting since October 1 for word on the new contract from Inland manpower fcr salary funding for the new year. At such time as funding is approved a full -tine counselor and a recreation coordinator will be hired. As of the middle of November# the Progren has a staff of th.-es - an acting director, a secretary and one Vista vcluateer. Seconds 7tney needed to buy aquipmont and carry out tournaments and actlrltiao is non- mdetent. Thirdr Thera is a groat deal of resistance on the part of the youth in participating in activities or progress that are in opposition to their long bold made of behavior and thoight. Such an attitude mattes it vary difficult to organize. NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPIWNT Da Au mo NAvu . Ew.u,v awtr 1230 E"St 894 Eida1 Acv. 0=60. fa 91764 SIR Benudmo, CL 92410 71498 3-2674 7144894W 714.98}267) .� PROJECT ESPETUNZA (HOPE) TO: FE04. Sub ,ranee Protect Hope 11071 Feron Blvd. PAnxhO Cucamnga, CA 91730 Progress report for the nontha of October and November 1479 contract a9reemnt. pursuant to i s'--A: dO-4Avar=, -Ph.d P-enstive Director i t° r :Or . monthly activities for the Booths of October and Lovanber, • 1. Adninistratics a. mloy■ent ' 7. Social services 4. Conaaerim in action 5. Aacrution 6. rutare Activities Adninistmtions Several changes have takrn plane in the axe N adufaistration. Doe to personal reason, Heainia Vargas, resigned a project director. Arturo Ayala has been ne:ned string directAr until the positim is filled again. Victor, pashas working in Los Olivos, in OpIcad, resigned his position as recreation coordinator. As of the middle of Move-bar, ve have only a staff of two and on VISTA volunteer in Aancho LLcormga and two VISAS in Loa Olives. we are sti11 waiting, at this tine, for work on the new co or f=m Indlaad sbnpower for salary funding for the new year. At each tin we exlAct to add ten staff personnel who vould be involved in area of social srvices and ratrescion. In the Ios 011ves center a Resident's Connell has been formed through the efforts of one of the V1SLi volnntears. the &in and perpose of the coracil is to have parents and youth of the housing cozplex share responsibility in decisions of ieportance concerning the • ecreation een•er D,oloy.-ents Sim" termination of the ton sonar eoploy= ant grogrsts, concentration has been nostly in trying to elate adults in jobs and at the sax Liss to develop job openings with different business eetahllshtents. Social Services, Social Services continue, at this tine, to take up a large portion of staff tix. • L-1 �r 10 parsecs— itmigratim 10 vorkman's compensation 10 consussr problems 00 individual oounsoling (related to mployment problems, social services, welfare, etc.) Consuaarisn in Action, Part of Project Copr aura's effort on behalf Of the comounity will be to provide a consmar program whose objective will be to assist conr mars involved in fraud CMOs against disreputablo oarchants and businesscsn. The program's goal is to save the consumer $100,000 by years and. At this time ve are servicing seven clients. Two have already been relabursed in amies totaling Close to $10,000. TW VISTA wluntests will be assisting the regular staff in developing the progrm which will soak to train 10 c toanity wlmtaers to help the conscner and yorhans run the progrm itself by this tine nest year. aecrmtlan, PACreation has been mostly limited to after school when youngsters cm, and ns• Mat little equipment is available, such as a ping Yong table, weights, ame hosing equipmnt, and a pool table. With the younger children (ages 8-14) Of the — Inity, intramural foothill gazes have Organized between centers. A visit to the Library Is planned by the youngsters of Pedro cucasonga. Unfortunately, due to shortage of staff ane. funds no long range planning is possible at this ties iurrre Activities. Our future places depend costly w the approval of the new MAktowu, contract, arrival Of mom VISTA vOIUnto4ra in early December, and money available. One future goal is to provide more than receaticn for the youth. A reading area with a paper back collection, maazinaa, ate., is being considered, alao smat.'dng in thO area of mployaant which would be very beneficial among older youths espec!ally the high school dropouts. Other Activities, The upholstery class in AaaNro Cucazon7a continues in full form wit% an average of 20 adult participants. l l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONTRACT • This contract is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter called CITY, and the National Institute for Community Development - Protect Esperanza, hereinafter called PROJECT IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOoS: WHEREAS, the City intends to encourage programs of benefit to the community; AND. WHEREAS, the PROJECT has signified a willingness to undertake a program of benefit to the rnm unity through raereationat oroaranmino, community SPrvirPC and cultuual events; AND. WHEREAS, the PROJECT is desirous of City assistance in non - personnel and non - programming support funding; 40 IT IS THEREFORE agreed by tho CITY and the PROJECT as follows: FIRST: The PROJECT agrees to perform, for the benefit of the Community, and for supportive consideration from the CITY, the work and services as herein set forth: ARTICLE I - `ACTH RECREATION PROGRMNING A. The PROJECT snail offer a program of organized and scheduled activities which shall include, but not be limited to, the following 1) Organized and scheduled craft instruction and activities, five hours per week mint ikm. 2). Organized and scheduled handoall instruction and activity, ten hours per week minimum. • 3) Organized and scheduled boxing instruction and activity, ten hours per week minimum. 4). Organized and scheduled tournaments, excluding handball and boxing, but to include activities such as, but not limited to, table tennis, carroms, table games, etc., two hours per week minim=. 5) Organized and scheduled seasonal sports such as, but not limited to, soccer, softball, basketball, etc., four dour per week minimum. 8. The PROJECT shall achieve organized and scheduled average orogram attendance goals of: 1). Thirty participants minivum per day from cocmencement of this agreement through September 30, 1979. 2). Forty participants minim= per day from October 1, 1979, through February 29, 1920; an,i 3). Fifty participants minimum per day from March 1, 1980, through conclusion of Agreement. C. The PROJECT shall operate a youth recreation facility at 10071 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucmconga, California. ':r the benefit of the community. Monday through Friday from the hours of 3:00 p.m. until 8:00 ..m. during the school year, excluding school holidays, ai.d submit for review by May 15, 1980, a summer schedule of operation during school vacation. ARTICLE 11 - REFERRAL FOR SERVICE OR ASSISTANCE A. The PROJECT shall provide a source for citizen referral service or assistance including, but not limited to, where information or help ® regarding consumer protection, legal assistance, medical assistance, etc., can be obtained An average of five referral contacts per day will be the program goal.' ARTICLE III - EMPLOYMENT A. The PROJECT shall provide assistance to directing citizens toward • employment opportunities. The placement of one adult in a Career opportunity full -tree employment situation per month by the PROJECT shall be the program goal. ARTICLE IV - COMMUNITY CUL��S A. The PROJECT shall promote and conduct on a quarter- annual basis, community cultural events, such as, but not limited to, guest speakers on topics of general community interests, C1nc0 de Mayo observance celebrations, Job Fairs, etc. ARTICLE V - ADMINISTRATION A. The PROJECT shall maintain detailed written records of, but not limited to, program activities regarding: 1. Program schedules; 2. Program attendance; 3. Program publicity 4. Financial accounting B. The PROJECT shall make these records immediately available for review by the CITY upon request by the CITY. C the PROJECT shall provide to CITY written program summary reports detailing performance of the Agreement with regards to all aspects of it's FIRST provision These reports will be submitted for review by pecerd:er 15, 1979, March 15, June 15 and September 15, 1980. 40 SEC0;10: The CITY agrees to supplement the PROJECT's Budget in the areas of facility rental, utilities, telephone charges, maintenance supplies, office supplies, mileage reimbursement, postage expenses, liability Insurance. and copying costs. Tht total CITY supplement is not to • exceed $7600.00. THIRD: Upon the PROJECT and CITY's mutual assent to this contract. CITY will designate a "Contract Administrator" The Contract Administrator will function as the CiTY's primary contact with tho PROJECT in implementing provisions_Of this agreement. The CITY's Contract Administrator for this Agreement will be William L. Holley, Director. Community Services Department. FOURTH: The City Council reserves the righ• and privilege of cancelling. suspending or abandoning the execution of the s6mplementatlon of PROJECT's budget by the CITY should the PROJECT fail to perfola in accordance with this Agreement. FIFTH: The terms of this Agreement shall be in force from it's mutual acceptance and execution by the PROJECT and the CITY until September 30. 1980, or until it's abandonment as specified in the FOURTH provision of this Agreement. • SiXTH: The PROJECT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY, its officers, agents and employees against all liability, claims, losses, demands and actions for injury to or death of persons or damage to property arising out of or in consequence of this agreement. 0 SEVENTH: This Agreement is contingent upon the success of the PROJECT in securing adequate funding to carry out program as proposed In Attachment 'A' under the Title VI - Special Project provision of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act, as administered by the Manpower Services Department, County of San Bernardino. -4- / V 0 y • Rational institute for Cocmunity Development City of Rancho Cucamnga Project Esperanza a Haan ate / pt' at�— ✓ Difte ty tLOrn at9 / ro etc o rector ate �rera a� to C, -5 -1 VF • AGENDA - item 6 -A M E M O R A N D U M Date: August 10, 1979 To: City Council and Manager From: Bill Holley Subject: N.I C.D. - Project Eeperanza The National Institute for Community Development's Pro act under CETA grant funding adminsitercd by County tanpower env cos, will complete the current funding cycle August 31, 1979 Manpower has extended, through a separate agreement, the funding of the project for an additional 30 days through the month of September There is not a 'tuaranteed" and "awarded" funding beyond that point for operation of N I C D 's Project H 0 Y , which with the beginning of the new _ federal fiscal year October 1, will vie for funds under the banner of Project Esperanza (Grant proposal atcac:,ed ) Charles Chapman, Director of Hanpower Services, indicates that the funding of Project Esperanza is 'highly probable' but has not occurred as yet • N I C D has requested $7,600 from the City of Rancho Cucamonga to supplement the amount proposed to be granted from Manpower. Use of this $7,600 would be for the operational support costs, i e., rent, utilities, postage, etc She "particulars" of the project are well known to Council, having been discussed at le•gth at several Council meetings and through various memoranda in light of that, I would be happy to answer specific or general questions regarding those particulars in lieu of repeating previously discussed information. Council Options: 1) Grant the request of N I C D 2) Deny request 3) Take no action Staff Evaluation: Option 1: Should Council exercise option 1, approval, it would be recommended that the approval be made subject to the following: 1) N I C D signs an agreement with City including but ® not limited to: a) Specific and quantifiable services to be performed by N I C D through Project Esperanza; page 1 of 2 l5o m& page 2 of 2 r i Memo 8/10/79 to: :C &CM. from: B Holley Subj Project Eeperanza • b) Period of performance; c) Payment methcd by City of funds; d) Appropriate provisions addressing agreement termination conditions 2) A not to exceed figure of $7,600 (a feature of agre =ent would be that all payments would be made directly to vendor, landlord or utility by City on beh=_3F N I C D. - Project Esperanza No cash wouid'be d.sbursed directly to N.I.C.D. other than reimbursement for mileage expenditures as they occur ) Option 2 Should Council exercise option 2, denial, the chances are probable the N I C D - Project Eeperanza would operate solely with Manpower CETn Grant, with or without this facility in North Town This would be politically unfavorable to City as we would be wade the 'bad guys" unwilling to try and help the kids from the Barrio Option 3 No action Staff does not see this as viable • Staff Recommendation: ;While my opinion has not changed regarding N I C D - Project Esperanza's ability to perform as proposed, I feel that with the Project -City agreement we can insure that the program is producing some good results for this Community and protect the City's interest and reputation Should the program not perform as agreed, we will terminate agreement with cause The new Project Director, Herminia Martel, may prove to be the proper ingredient needed to finally make program work I hope so I recommend exercising of OpLion No 1 by Council with conditions as outlined above This will be on the Council agenda of August 15 If you have any questions prior to that time, please let me know 1 523 0 0 - c � H E H 0 R A N D U H Date: January 14, 1979 Io: Lauren Wasserman Frcm: Bill Hollev Subject: Project H.0 Y. Requcat for Endorsement for Arrowhead Justice Association Grant Funding. Background Project H O.Y. (Help Our Youth) is a CETA VIB Program whose funding will expire in March of this year Purpose of the project, as you know, is a "delinquency prevention" program aimed at the North Town area The City aided the project twice in 1977 by first supplementing their recreation supplies with equipment purchased byy City (approx- imately $1700 of the $2000 authorized) and second, by acting as their sponsor for the i M.A Summer Youth Recreation Pr =gram Grant (approx- imately $2400) They are currently based st the "Contact Station" on 24th Street in the North Town area, with administrative offices in Ontario The project director is Sam Maestas, who replaced Lillian Rodriquez The parent orgonlzation for H 0 Y is the National Institute for Community Development (N I.0 D ) of San Bernardino, administered by Armando Navarro. Situation As the funding for H 0 Y is due to expire in March, r new funding source is being sought to continue the program A proposal from N I C D is attached asking for an "endorsement" by tho Council of a "new" program and its goals - - -The West End :omprehensive Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program Summary of Proposal 1) Their proposed program covers three jurlsdictionn, Ontario, Upland and Rancho Cucamonga 2) It is Project if O.Y under a different label ® 3) It requires no City funding. 4) Deadline for proposal is February 1, 1919 I5q -I- • %r i memo 1/12/79 To: L. Wasserman From: B. Holley Subj: Project HOY page 2 Staff Evaluation and Recommendation This proposal is lengthy and constructed of the rhetoric normally associated with a proposal of this nature. Although requested twice, a "nuts and bolts" of just erectly what their program will do, how it will be done and by whom, continues to be cloaked in lofty goals. The goals of the program are good, prevent crime, encourage job training, community pride, etc. One cannot disagree with any goals stated without challenging the Flag, apple pie, and motherhood. However, in my opinion. N.I.C.D, has not demonstrated through this proposal a process of achieving those goals. 0 Council should be ware that, while this item has not been placed on the Agenda, Hr. Yaestas and /or Hr. Navarro intends to speak during the 'Public" comment section of Agenda to request an endorsement by Council of proposal. Council has three basic options: 1) Endorse project as beneficial to the comunity. • 2 Reject project endorsement. ,V3 Thank thin for their presentation and take no action. A.,I ,recommend option number 3. I request that this me=randum be forwarded to council as an "it, ormational" item only, for the meeting of jaauary 15 BH /zw C � M E M O R A N D U M Date: July 3, 1979 TO: City Manager and Council From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Information Only - Project HOY This morning, Armando Navarro, who addressed Council in April of 1978 on behalf of Project HOY. indicated his intention of rryuesting from Council at meeting of July 5, several thousand dollars (enact amount had not been determined) from the Revenue Sharing allocation to augment his program. Purpose of requested funding would be for rental of the facility, known as the Contact SLation, on 24th Street Project HOY has had a very unstable record of performance since its inception some 15 months ago They are on their fourth project director, at their third location, and viable funding is looking very bleak beyond the fall of this year I do not believe their written records of performance balances aggainst my personal observation and the Soed faith shown their operation by the City They are setting up a "public relations" session on Tuesday, July 24, 10 00 a m., at the Contact Station, to tell everyone, including the press, of their "new" program, and will be inviting Council and Staff as well I will be in attendance Staff Recommendation 4r ould a request for funding be made, thenk Project HOY for it's input and proceed BH /mw El { �I PROM THE DESK OP: y� � JIM RODlNSON " / -1 az —,: - -71 edema I aa,,� ,f po- H E N 0 R A N D U N Date: December 13, 1979 To City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Coaminity Services Subject: Cucamonga- Guasti Regional Park On Thursday, December 6, a meeting was held between Catherine Bridge, County Regional Park Commission, Jim Robinson and myself, to discuss concerns on the aM,ve The concern specifically centers on the proposed location of th• County Justice Center to the southeast of Archibald and 4th Street or land purchased by County for expansion of Guasti Park In follow -up discussion with Gary Patton, Regional Park Director, December 10, the situation was outlined as follows 1 The Countypurchased this property with 1974 State Bond Act money designated for park purposes, with the expansion of Gansu Park in mind 2 The County has submitted a request to State asking for permission to use a portion of this land for the Justice Center The "footprint" land -3f the building itself is proposed to be "bought back' from the park and the proceeds from the sale would then be recommitted to parkland acquisition Additionally, the proposal suggests the parking for the Justice Center would be joint use for the remainder of the site which would be developed as parkland 3 The State has not reacted yet to the proposal, but will do so shortly Nr Patton takes no position on the proposal, either for or against The Issues 1 Does the City Council have reason to address this issue, as Guasti Park does not fail within the City? It could seem reasonable for Council to consider the matter, as both the park and the Justice Center are regional facilities and both would be heavily used by the residents of the City 2 Are the two uses compatible, that of a park and a Justice Center? Mould the clientele of each be compatible one with the other? 3 Is it in the best interest of the General Public to build the Justice Center on the limited amount of lend reserved for park purposes? page 1 of 2 New 12/13/79 To: C C 6 C.H. Pram: B. Molloy Subj: Cuasti Park Council options 1 Elect not to address the issue as one which falls within the County's purview ,y 2 Bequest County provide a copy of full proposal to Council as it directly affects the residents of Rannho Cucamonga, and ask that P. final decision on the Justice Center's location be delayed until the County is able to consider the City's input 3 Bequest County not locate Justice Center within the Park site Staff Comment Without the full detailed proposal, option 3 is not viable as the full picture is not available to Council If Council chooses not to discuss item under new business, option 1 will have been exercised Should the Council wish to address the issue, a letter from the Mayor should he directed to Supervisor McElwain, with a copy to .card Chairman Mayfield, asking opportunity to review and discuss the proposal with County before a final decision is mado on the proposal This matter is not a scheduled agenda it1m, but should be brought up under New Business if Co ncil wishes to act Staff Recommendation: option 2 ` INTER-01 TICE MEMO �ff�J� DATE O;-tol,rt '7, 1979 j,gLE FROM CARL ;UORW[B � rfQ�G�I%"V` PIIONE LU18 S4 C�C rtit County Administrative offic- t TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUBJECT WEST VALLEY LAI1 .1110 JUSTICE MtrI:R RECOMIEMDATIOUS 1. Approve the space program and location concept :ar the West Valley Law and Justice Center as outlined; 2. huthorizo the Public Works Agency to solicit proposals for the retention of a construction management firm to supervise all aspects of the design and construction program; 3. Authorize the County Administrative Otficer to develop a joint powers authority proposal t3 finance a portion of the West valley Law and Justice Center In January 1978, Cruen and Assor.tatcs presented a master plan d_velopment program to replace the e•trrent Law and JuLttee facilities at W. and Mountain in Ontario Tito policy direction given to the consultants was to plan additional spat at the current site to meet 1995 needs and the retention of Municipal Court organizations as they currently n,._'tt -- CRUEM SPACE PLA11 The consultants presented a space pld., '•Ich called for: -- Six municipal Courts dt the site In addition, f. ur t.,uits worl.l ae retained in Chino but administecad as par_ of a progtam I -- Clrven 5., "•rior Cuurta to serve the eat. to P:rst �,)ln Vall.ry atca -- Cotttt rut%tva f.•I-t I II ICS including Offices for Cho Ot.trict A;t rm ; Puulic Uefcndcr, Probation, Public AJmxnista'.,tor /Coronur, Mar -hal, Sltnr/ff and County Cicrk -- JdLI fart l It to plow nie b,.ol.inn services to local police tit It., area, and mt f icwal prisoner huusing sp.tCU lU t,crvu t „u .ourt's daily needs r Big baWy view duq*w bA16 qr disoyassonaoonor:amen,caate+lam 14 December 1979 Honorable Jim Prost, Mayor, and Members, City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PEES Dear Mayor Frost and Council Memberst After reading a letter sent to you dated December 13, 1979, by Superintendent Norm Guith, Central School District, I have the following comments. - - -- - 1. The $63.000 figure for portable classrooms which I am quoted as making in 0grose rrore is the highest of three figures provided by CenU al School District last spring. 2. Central School District claims that BIA refused to meet them. This is not true. Central refused to meet with BIA because we wanted to talk about alter- natives to a fee increase. Central only wished to discuss an increase, not alternatives. 3. Before the Central School District can quote costs of portable buildings at $56,000 plus dollars, we should like to demand copies of three separate tats for port- able classrooms. We are informed that tho portable classrooms being bought by the State of California with the $13 million granted under AB 8 are costing less than $32,000 each. Why does Central need an additional $24,000.007 4. Should this increase be provided Central School District it should only be after: A. An audit of all collected builder fees be provided as is mandatory under SB 201. 11 SO N M=tLn Ave ft. A. Ste 207 , Ugm,d CA 91786 (714) 991.2997 M AU3%d to NANB wM ra COLA B. SucP an audit show how much has been spent on what. C. She question of - illegally collected" fees (fees collected prior to th3 enactment of the original ordinance) be answered fully. Sze would like to see a list of all fees collected by tract number with date of collection. If these questions cannot be answerer and three .annest bids for portable classrooms be provided, we then feel the fee increase should be challenged. c, --- wI.. Director December 11, 1979 'Pty of Rancho Cucmm 194 P.O. Box 791 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91733 Attentions City Council The Central School District has attempted to Beet with representatives of the William yon Company ny Association Baldy View the Cil�typCouncildat the November 7 meeting. William Lyon Company Un[ortulmtely. the Building Industry Association and Killian Lyon Company have - repeatedly refused to meet and discuss the issue of developers' teas under 58 701 The Central School District has carefully stadsed the information presented to the City Council /.y Hr. Ken Willis, Business Inaustr• Association, in an attempt to develop rationale for a reasonable fee based upon the provisions of .;ovenwent Code 6$970 to 65978. The Central School District is willing to doe, l that pthe growth in sesdfzcm rollmant experionced in Septembcr, 1979, was private arhools due to the elimination of double sessions However, wnrollment has increased, and Vill continue to increase, as a direct result of the develop- ment of recently approved, or to be approved, dwelling units The Central c District interprets 0riipd lne9tsNat the feespaid - shouldbeararea onableelaatonshipt thaeds for chools caused by the development.' In referrinq to a letter to the City Council from the Building Industry Association on November 7, 1979, Hr. Willis indicates clearly that the original number of building permits. 738, would produce 147 children. Mr. Willis futther states correctly that five classrooms are needed to house the 141 students However, Hr. Willis grossly underestimates the coat of five clsss- room set up with utilities, furniture, and equipment at 843.000 each. During fact finding eo®SCtee meetings in the Spring of 1979, it was incorra:tly estimated that portable classrooms could be installed for approximately 861,000 each in actuality, the costs to the Central School District for four portable classrooms installed on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus are enumerated on the following page. ClJNTLM SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SQHoCt DOHA MIRCED SCHOOL VALUE VISTA!04= 7915 Axtbeld An. 7611 Halh on A". 10311 Polo Alto SL 77V Voila Mom D:.+s Tel 714941.7541 Ad. 114-987.1788 Td 4 71980.1600 UL 714981.8697 Boyd D7 flmrru tam A. CENTRAL V I i� O.MF Ta, «, Qrlt F. Shoe., a 03..,W,m6rr L SA , 0 03l J F6 .I. J Wdphl, alr.neo SCHOOLI�y 01", °Hw iGa DISTRICTd � C90M .e+ C e � gpnalr.drel `; lu�u zo.t 51iptealrmtOu low. A. McOa7•Am 9457 Foothill Boulevard tancho Ncomonga, California 91730 Tat. 714.989.8541 December 11, 1979 'Pty of Rancho Cucmm 194 P.O. Box 791 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91733 Attentions City Council The Central School District has attempted to Beet with representatives of the William yon Company ny Association Baldy View the Cil�typCouncildat the November 7 meeting. William Lyon Company Un[ortulmtely. the Building Industry Association and Killian Lyon Company have - repeatedly refused to meet and discuss the issue of developers' teas under 58 701 The Central School District has carefully stadsed the information presented to the City Council /.y Hr. Ken Willis, Business Inaustr• Association, in an attempt to develop rationale for a reasonable fee based upon the provisions of .;ovenwent Code 6$970 to 65978. The Central School District is willing to doe, l that pthe growth in sesdfzcm rollmant experionced in Septembcr, 1979, was private arhools due to the elimination of double sessions However, wnrollment has increased, and Vill continue to increase, as a direct result of the develop- ment of recently approved, or to be approved, dwelling units The Central c District interprets 0riipd lne9tsNat the feespaid - shouldbeararea onableelaatonshipt thaeds for chools caused by the development.' In referrinq to a letter to the City Council from the Building Industry Association on November 7, 1979, Hr. Willis indicates clearly that the original number of building permits. 738, would produce 147 children. Mr. Willis futther states correctly that five classrooms are needed to house the 141 students However, Hr. Willis grossly underestimates the coat of five clsss- room set up with utilities, furniture, and equipment at 843.000 each. During fact finding eo®SCtee meetings in the Spring of 1979, it was incorra:tly estimated that portable classrooms could be installed for approximately 861,000 each in actuality, the costs to the Central School District for four portable classrooms installed on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus are enumerated on the following page. ClJNTLM SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SQHoCt DOHA MIRCED SCHOOL VALUE VISTA!04= 7915 Axtbeld An. 7611 Halh on A". 10311 Polo Alto SL 77V Voila Mom D:.+s Tel 714941.7541 Ad. 114-987.1788 Td 4 71980.1600 UL 714981.8697 City of 8ancho Cucamonga December 13, 1979 Page 2 Pour classrooms per bid 0 $44,989.70 $179,959 Necessary Installations Paving 5,373 Electrical 10,468 Fencing around transformers 362 Fire alarms 300 Clocks and belle 2,200 9,850 Plumbing 6,000 2.083 TCFrAL 24,723 Furniture 8,332 TWAL $213,014 The fifth classroom to be installed will most approximately $56,922.70 and is enumerated as follows, One portable per bid 0 44,999.70 Necessary Installation: Paving 3,750 Electrical 2,600 Plumbing 3,000 Clocks, bells, fire alarms 500 9,850 Furniture 2.083 TCFrAL 56,922 70 please note that the installation of the four portable classrooms phis the addi- tional portable classxro necessary due to the increase in students from the 218 homes results in a total expenditure to the school district of $269,936.70. In retrospect, the fee should have appropriate.y been $1,134 for each of the 238 hoses However, $94,432 has been collected from the 104 homes that have already drawn permits, leaving 134 homes yet to draw permits The total cos` of $269,936 less the amount collected, $94,432, divided by 134 dwelling unita establishes a $1,310 fee required to raise the necessary $175,504 for the project. The Central School District is withdrawing the origins: request for nine double - wide modular classroms to provide h..using for students who bear no reasonable relationship to new home ccnstrurtton The Central School District hereby requests an increase in developers' fees to $1,310 per dwelling unit to be applied to the remaining 134 dwelling units in order to provide school housing for those students rerulting from the development. Sincerely, Superintendent NCG,vs The study orop•c LCd a "". I ni And ,lu•,ticc space neud at 6th and Henetaln of 151,000 .,luarc ftut. Review of the Gruen Plan This office has reviewed the assamptlGns of growth in the oriVinal report to yrrify the spare progran. The review considered the aceelurated population growth occ cring in the two years since the study was done. A, addition, the ciL} of Rancho Cucamonga uas incorporated, and a firmer dovrlopmenl plan is nuu underway for the Chino Hills area. This review was needed before ony recommendation could be presented to obligate planning t.—ds included in the 1979 -00 budoet for the West Valley law and aus.icc Center. Based on County Planning Department data, the review projected growth in the Hest valley area to the year 2000. This has shown that the growth estimates for the area are higher than presented in thv Gruen study B}• 1995, there will be approx- imately 400,000 people compared to a Gruen estimate of 315,000. It is further estimated that the population will grow to about 425,000 by the year 2000. Othar changes reviewed included the space needs for the Rancho Cucamonga contract law enforcement program and the impact which the Chino Hills development will have on the size and location of law enrorcement facilities needs Suitability of the 6th and Mountain site After its submission, the Gruen report was reviewed by County departments, the Courts and the Board That review revealed: -- The nc�d for suLStantial additions to the current facilities would likely Produce interim program disruption and an inefficient structure frnm a court administrative viewpoint. -- Given the total square footage required, it mlght b, cconomicaul, advant:,lvuus to relocate the entire complun to mu,ther -- The population centers ncrt•ed by tilt facility were muvinr fat Lher from L130 currc,L site, and the City Of Ontario was ro0cc•r,.•d abouL the potential increasing congestion ill the 6Lh a.•d MOUIILain arcs Given all these faders and the initial assrssment of cost and efficiuuey of ,1 malot fait u;, d new sits for a Law and Justice Center IS luutif Lad. RM ST4L AND scorL or uxs'r VALIA . 1J'X ANU JUbTICH_CL.M.1 Based on the updated I:est V ,' 1, y law au,l justice ncc,ls and the projected survive populal,un, a spacu program for the construction of a now Cunter is recomma,dud to include 21 court and hearing rooms and sufficient space to house court related functions by 2000 Sheriff Law onforcurent space and ,jail booking facilities should be located else - where. These are scussed in detail below The hest Valley area needs facilities for 25 _judicial >josid ons an related activities The judicial workload projections for the Nast Valley area, including Chino, will require 25 Superior and Municipal court and hearing rooms for adults and juveniles by the year 2000. of this, 21 courtroons st,ould be provided in the new+ Center. This is four more than projected in the Gruen report This increase is primarily due to a larger projected population and axtanding the planning period to the year 2000. This projection assumes some future relief by the diversion of traffic violations Lo Lhe Department of •lotor Vehicles and some possible saving through non - judicial arbitration of small claims matters Both these issues have been discussed by the Legislature. Offsetting this, however, is the increasingly long periods of court time required for felony preliminary hearings, appeals, and personal injury filings. No reductions in projected court space have been msdo to reflect possible major Statewide court reform or consolidation The Chino County building currently houses one court for the Chinn Municipal court Division The facility wan constructed to provide four courtrooms in the building The twenty -year workload projections indicaLC that 25 west Valley court and hearinq rooms will be necessary. This office recommends that part of that need be met by fully utilizing the four Chino courtrooms. Space is need,.d at thr new Center for court related doparancnts including the ULSLricl ALLOrn y, Pjbli, Oetender, Nayshal, County C1crL, PLUWLion Department, Public Administrator and Sheriff The original program ebtimatcd about 47,000 square feet ,could be uecesb.uy ba:.ed on con,L workload projections. Givan the revised program for added court space and Lho extended plannu,q ti,Le, Lhe space nocdu will be approximately 62,000 square feet. It is likely that in buil.11u., for future capacity, a separate, less expense oflica bo,lding :,,r a,:,t of Lhunc functions may be more dusirablo. Liucl, ., d, iwlulaneut plan will perwit the County to make interin uvv ,I until court workload donaud ome npnru tat other activitien quite maximum occupancy. In addttion, a detaileJ rcv u u of the activities of the support departments will be done to delorminc if ceitaln functions can be performed more efficiently and economically in space other than at a major justice facility. Then�ce >nnded Pest Valle subs Latlon at 6th and Mountain will tt6adC<I tla CeTr 99 The hest Valley substation is beinq expanded this year as part of the interim space program presented in the Gruen report This will provide for 67 employees which will be adequate to serve an unincorporattd area population of about 75,000 based on Sheriff worlload. Tito expanded site at 6th and Mountain also provides a centralized booking facility to the hest Valley police agon !es. It had been anticipated that a new regional substation would be included in the proposed complex. As a result of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff law enforcement services contract, the Citv has indicated a strong desire to have space within its boundaries to house this function which eliminates tho need for a centrally located substation. Major unincorporated area growth trends are in the Chino area. If these areas remain outside of cities, and territory now adjacent to best Valley cities is annexed over the next five to ten years, a permanent replacement for the west Valley sub- station in the Chino area may be the most efficient method for providing general law enforcement service. Such a decision need not be addressed at this time, however. Mast valley tail facilities will he adequate_ through 1990 The jail facility located adjacent to the substation at 6th and Mountain currently can hold 25 prisoners. Tito intermediate exransion program recononended by Gruen will be completed later this year and will increase Lhe prisoner capacity to 7. Ttn• current prisut,cr pol,Oari.>u avera>tws about 16 per dal It is prnleeted Utat the erpanded facility will be nJ:.luaLr as a buokinq center Lhrou,th 1190 Detention space fur prisoncri appearsuV ill wuit will be hui!t in the new Law and Juat_ive ecntuc This rccotrnu_ndattuu asrumas a con - Linued pt t:.onur Li'an:,lv>i rat tun nyr.Wn IA -Lw• ull thu heat Valley and Use Central Jail Lhruugh 1999. Because of increasinq Countywtdu puuulatiun, by 1990 additional pre- sentenced jail npacu will he ueoded Immediate consideration sltculd be given Lu •.Ludy utg It size and location for additional jail faCLILLietl If a dueu.a.,a rs wade Lu construct a major pre - sentenced jail fa.. i l[ty n. the t:c! t V..1 I.•y, tllon poli Cc agency bouking� will be aoon •+.•da wd at a uuw Jail and CLC 6th and mountain faCiliLY will I.• ..1jandonud GL•OGRAP11IC. \L 1'�C.lTI0t1 Or A KCST VALLCY LAN AND JUSTICE CENTER Land prices in Uds area are high. Consc.lucutly, If the County can find land al•cady in public owucrship on which to build a Ccntcr, a savings of nearly d million dollars will be Icllicvcd. In nowrownswaIsuitablelundeveloped [,arceltofmland thaL the Regional Park. The property was purchased uith Stater Pack Dond funds which restrict its use to recreational purposes Reresenati.es of the ofpparks tandv Recreation Ctonexplore the potentials fore Director have met with the using part of this site for a Law and Justice Center. Tl.e Stater Director initially indicated that he has a substantial con- cern with respect to the alternattvo uses of park lands without providing renlacement resources iluuever, he was also favorably impressed with the possibility that soac features of a Law anJ Justice Center on a site adjacent to the park would be compatible with uses for the park program. To address the State's concerns, tho Public Works Agency is preparing a detailed analysis propo sing compatible uses of a portion of the Cucamonga- Guasti site for the Law and Justice Center incorporating common parking, a development program which would emphsize landscaping and public cecrtation uses of the maximum of recreational aland sfor that which would obeiLost•toabuilding Ot space, and the space. This site at 4th and Archibald in the City of Ontario offers significant advantages for the development of a Law and Justice Center It is centrally located, and it Ilas arterial access from the major bast Valley population centers Also, it is in an area uhich is not yet fully developed and, therefore, could accommodate future court related private sector develop- ment We will report the details o.' an agreement with the State Department of Parks and Ree:cation for use of tills site prior to making any rccommcndatiuns to Lnuur contractual obligations. DCVLLOP'IE:rr COST AIM YIt:A1:C1::G 1=11uDS In July, the Doard was pre.onted a ff eau:my report an the best V..11.y Law .,11,1 Jtl,.tleo C,•n Let .111.e p t d Cuunty t:ovrrnuv_•nL Ce11L%r. '1.l.. pro)cctl•J conL for develop - tune ni a t:eut Valley Law an.l Ju+tLCV Ca,lcr was cstituted at $26 2 mLl Lion pr,•JLCaLCU -r. Ll:u grin u.al dcvclupment plan as presented by Grucn and A .if is tte:, but rui,sl•lerinq the alternative site of L.iu•amol•., ,uo•:ti Petk: 'rile cot,ts includtc planning and construc'tell ul Iw faCilitii.s along with the necessary costs to landscape and eurplete the park site at Cucamonga- Guasti. The revised program outlined in this report indicates that 21 rather than 17 courts will be needed .:.w ostinates for tho prolcct have been developcu reflecting this and other chi rgcs A space program procidinq about 270,000 square feet will cost an estimated 626 9 million. This includes all landscaping necessary .o make the facility compatible with the adjacent park: property and development of the remaining State bond purchased park land A program of this scope needs to be financed at least partially through long -term financing. It is possible to use cash financing for many parts of the program. The current budget includes $1.8 million to begin the project Of the total $26.9 million projected cost, we can cash finance all costs of an office structure, parking, landscaping and development of the park These total $6.9 million As outlined in the July report, this cash financing is possible because the Board has not obligated $10.1 million which was available at the and of 1977 -78 The construction cost for the courthouse building will be approximately $20 million based on escal ted costs to 1980 -81. It is recommended t,hac this portion be financed by long -term bonds. The annual repayment obligation for the bonds would be about $1 6 million nor year Based on the County's past experience, it is cstimatcd that this obligation could be mot within a cash finances capital improvements program which has bean about $G million annually A long -term obligation of this amount can therefore be ac commoda Led within the allowable e::ponditure ceiling which may be imposed on us through Prnposition J Crc.Liun of a joint powers authority will allow the salo Of bend., at witot is N eely to be the lowest interert rater Ue .,,Quid prn,:ccd iry ^.rutaw l; to enplutu Lhis and any similar financing arrangemu.tc PI:uJI c-i Ul::.lb.. A..) ..UPI W. 1:: 1U I The llcst Vall.y Law and Jur LiCL Center will be tau largrst cunut.uctiun proleLL .u..l.lt.Ikon by tl.e County AllLrnativc ru:Lhuda of uup• rvt ti.w the p,..tra.n •Q .n.rure timely completion at the lowest p «atble prtc. . inyu•rat t%e. There are three principal mathoJ.. rl.ielt are .nit Lined below: a. A conventional sy--trn, n s aw archil •.Lt to pr,: are plans and Tln_n thv Count-,• sui,..Lvisos the oiddiny and dirccll manacles Lite project. b. A performance plan and specification system re,luires the bidding contractors to assemble an architectural and cngineering team sr that design and construction preparation ptueecd tcgtther, thereby reducing project construction time c. A construction management approach provides for the County to hire a construction management firm who works wiLh the Co uity, architect and contractor throughout the pro,..ct Tito construction manager is the County's representative with principal responsibility for controlling costs. The firm is usually paid a flat fee for this service. The County has previously used both the conventional and per- formance plan methods. The construction manager concept has recently gained subsLantial recognition in public entity projects and is widely used in the private sector. The construction management system assists in the preparation and review of bid packages as well as supervising the project during construction by employing various specialists through- out the term of the project This tends to assure the County of rcceivii,g the best techniques of construction, materials and scheduling The cost of this method varios depending on the amount of service desired and is negotiated on a fixed fee basis rather CAan a percentage of the project co-t- Using this and other negotiated incentives, the construction manager can often complete the program ahead of schedule and for less than original); esLinntcd In addition, by using an outside firm, the County avoids the exponso of adding specialized staff to supervise the project CG rat Cc: Superior Cou1 t Fhc+icipnl cunrt Cuun Li Licit. Sheriff District ALtorlu•y Public Defender Ate. - rrobit ton Ma l -;11.11 l•ub i1L Admu,i.Li'ntor Law 6 Justice Agency - rubllc Works Agency_ Auditor - Controller a Jul .•V '� Gb3I GEs� k. V� .�, • U v J- L i r s�a•YaB - w� @tie wpd�gqpp 0 g.e HAP s Y.± O . O 9ii B� 8r_V! 0 3 G fi ° Mye °o�A9 Yigq aE � R�tyw•e_v 98n`� ]If - -;E of b_s a s14Y Y re��•8 rg:9B3$d 9 i Y I ay ^ v .' d ,U 6 ppv- �• a 9s �o } /a-l� -79 FROM THE DESK OF LAUREN M. WASSERMAN X44 Aa-v �. 44 6-�o/Cll>' �o INFORUMV'ON SHEET 1955 - Introduced San Bernardino Coun•y Hesolutirn which was passed requesting State to put the Devore Route in State Freeway System. Senator Swift Berrv, Assemblyman Vincent Thaws both carried Omnibus Highway bills including Devore Route to ba added to State System. They failed 1956 - Above failed again. 1957 - Above failed again. 1958 - Route was put into State System by legislative act 1958. 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, b 1969 Intensive lobbying at State level to fund construction of freeway. From 1965 to 1972 - Lobbied to have route put into Interstate System. 1972 - Devore Route put into interstate System. After local group (Mikesell, Reid Sprinkel, Barney Jewett, King, Horzen, etc.) intervened at Federal Highway Administration in Washington D C. on bandlf . the State of California. 1974 - Ground broken for construction May 1974 at Glen Helen Ranch. 1976 - Ribbon cutting ceremonies upon completion of 1st major unit - Septembsr 1976 at Sierra May and Cut -off From 1955 thru 1958 we spoke to cities, counties, chamber of carmerces and many, many orga,itati0ns in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside. San Bernardino, San Diego, Inyo a•rd Moan Counties to seek support for the Devore project Also we formed in 1956 The Devore Freeway Association which had many members from the above communities Ultimately we had 135 resolutions from as many cities and 5 from Los Angeles, Grange, San Bernardino, Riverside and Monc Counties. This widespread support was used in testimony before various interim and regular conmittes at the State level for 1 Inclusion of route in State System, 2 Rea-.est for construction fund, 3 Utilized the strength at the federal level to have route placed in the Interstate System. 0�.J i `ti!&'...s. A- U S N O R A N 0 U 11 Date: December 13, 1979 7o: City council and City k3nager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Servicas Subject: Cucamonga- Guasti Regional Park On Thursday, December 6, a meeting was held between Catherine Bridge, County Regional Park Commission, Jim Robinson and myself, to discuss concerns on the above. The concern specifically centers un the proposed location of the County Justice Center to the southeast of Archibald and 4th Street on land purchased by County for expansion of Guasti Park. In follow -up discussion with Gary Patton, Regional Pare Director, December 10, the situation was outlined as follows: 1 The County purchased this property with 197e State Bond Act money designated for park purposes, with the expansion of Guasti Park in mind 2 The County has submitted a request to State asking for permission to use a portion of this land for the Justice G nter The "footprint" lard of the building itself is proposed to be "bought back" from the park and the proceeds from the sale would then be recomltted to parkland acquisition Additionally, the proposal suggests the parking for the Justice Center would be joint use for tae remainder of the site which would be developed as parklard 3 The State has not reacted yet to the proposal, but will do so shortly Hr Patton takes no position on the proposal, either for or against. The ?ssces 1. Does the City Council have reason to address this issue, as Guasti Park does not fall within the City? It would seem reasonable for Council to consider the mutter, as both the park and the Justice Center are regional facilities and both would be heavily used by the residents of the City 2 Are the two uses coepatible, that of a park and a Justice Center? Mould the clientele of each be compatible one with the other? 3. is it In the best interest of the General Public to build the Justice Center on the United ..mount of land reserved for park purposes? page 1 of 2 New 12/13/79 To CC a H. From B. Volley Sub): Guasti Park Council options 1 Elect not to address the issue as one which falls within the County's purview 2 Request County provide a copy of full proposal to Council as it directly affects the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, and ask that a final decision on the Justice Center's locution be delayed until the Comty is able to consider the City's input. 3 Request County not locate Justice Center within the Park site. Staff Comment Without the full detailed proposal, Option 3 is not viable as the full picture it not available tc Council If Council chooses not to discuss item under new business, Option 1 will have been exercised Should the Council wish to address the issue, a letter frog the Hayor should be directed to Supervisor IkFlwain, with a copy to Board Chairaan Hayfield, asi.ng opportunity to review and discuss the proposal with County before s final decision is mad* on the proposal This natter is not a scheduled o coda lien, but should be brought up under New Business Council w arses to act Staff Recommendation Option 2 ifire«- OFFICE MEMO w; DATE OUCOLur 17, 1979 ( FROM EARL GOODWIN 1TOZ`t'o''�� PHONE 2016 County AdministraLiva Offirrt TO BOARD OF' SUPERVISORS SUBJECT NEST VALLEY TAW AND JUSTICE CENTER RECO*4:- 1UNDATIOtIS 1. Approve the space program and locntion concept for the West Valley Law and Justice Center au outlined; 2. Authorize the Public Works Agency to solicit proposals for the retention of a construction maragement firm to supervise all asparts of the design and construction programt 3. Authorize the County ,Administrative Officer to u:velop a joint powers authority proposal to finarco a portion of the Nose Valley Law and Justice Center. In January 1978, Gruen and Assoria' 1 •sonted a master pldn development program to repl. a th• cur it Law and Justice facilities at 6th and Mounts.,: it r• .o. The policy direction given to the eonsultan to plan additional spacs at the current site to meet _.,S needs and the retention of Municipal Court organizations as they currently exitt. -- CRUCN SPACE PLAN The consultants presented a space plan which called for: -- Six municipal Courts at the site. In addition, fnur cuuits would be retained in Chino but administered as part of a .unsnlidated program. 'n -- eleven Suprrior Courts to servo the entire West Valley area. • -- Court rUla Lt'(1 facilities inr.luding offices Car thv Dcarrir, Alturnt•y, rublic Dofendor, Probattun, Public A.1-ninisir .,tor /Cora„er. Marshal, Sheriff and County Clurl. -- Jail Cactltttr:: It: p„ vide 1"ll un, services to local police dv,.arth.v,tf: ut .1., 11rrd, and •:utficiont prisoner huusing space Cu Lurvu tl,e cuu*tIs daily nccus. The study projected a 1775 L.n+ nod J11:1ticu spocc nucal at Gth and Mountain of 151,000 -Inare fuut. Review of Lhe Cruen plan This office has reviewed the assumptions of growth in the uriyinal repurt to verify the space program. The rovier considered ttae accelerated population growth occurring in tho two years since tlae study was done In addition, the elLy of Rancho Cucamnnga Itas incorporated, and a firmer d..vulopncnl plan Is ntaw underway for the Chino Hills area. This review was needed before any recoameundation could be presented to obligate planning funds included in the 1979 -00 budget for the Wamst Valley Law and Justice Center. Based on Coutty planning Department data, the review projected growth in the west Valley area to the year 2000 This has shown that the growth estimates for the area are higher than presented in rho Gruen study By 1995, there will be app,ox- _ imately 400,000 people compared to a Gruen estimate of 315,000. It is further estimated that the population will grow to about 425,000 by the year iuu0. Other ch.tngai reviewed included the space needs for the Rancho Cucamo.,a. contract law enforcement program and the impact which the Chino Hills development will have on the size and location of low enforcement facilities needs Suitability of Lho 6th and Mountain site After its submission, the Gruen report was reviewed by County departments, the Courts and the Board. That review revealed: -- Tile need for substantial additions to the current facilities would likely produce intotim program disruption and an inefficient structure from a court administrative viewpoint. -- Given the total square footage requtrnd, it might bt• economtcallf ativantageuus to relocate the entire coml,lua Lo another 10C.alten. -- The population centers served by the facility were muviny further from Liao current :ti Le, and the City of Ontario was concerned abuuL the potential increasing congustion in thu GO and 'ountaln area. Given all Utese factors .11111 Liao initial asst•GGmcnt of cost anJ efficiency uC a malot fa" lit•, a our• site for a Law and Justice CCnLcr is juuLific•d. SUL AND SCOPL Oi' UEST VA61.17 l.i d: 1110 .IUSTICK CL::TI.h Basad on the updated trust v.11.y lau cold justice needs and the projected service populallon, a npacu program for the construction of a now Cantor is rccommcndud to include 21 court and hearing cocoa and sufficient space to house court related opacc and jai functions lbookinq fac f facilities utlouldbeatu atodcolsac whurc. Tlteso are discussed in dotail below The Wcst_y4LJay area needs facilities for 25 judicial posr eons an re etc act vt.tlss The judicial workload projections for the Nast Valley area, including Chino, will require 25 Supotior and Municipal court and hearing rooms for adults and juveniles by the year 2000 Of this, 21 courtrooms should be provided in the new Center. This is four more than projected in tits Gruen This duo to a torthe projected year 200. This projection assumes some future relief by the diversion of traffic violation& to the Department of :lo for Vehicles and some possible saving through non - judicial arbitration of small claims matters Both these issues Imave been discussed by the Lcgaslaeurc Offsetting this, however, is the increasingly long periods of court time required for folony preliminary hearings, appeals, and ,personal injury filings. No reductions in r majlorostatewideucourtdrefllrm ave or consolidation. f leer possibly The Chino County buildiig currently houses one court for the Chino four courtruorse in Tho s constructed Thetwenty yoor workload projections ind_cate that 25 %lest valley court and parts f thatsneedl becmetcbys fully This LheefooureChino at courtrooms. Space is needed at till, new Center for cou t relatud departments inclucltng the DisLrieL ALLOrnvy, Public DCfondcr, Flarahal, County Clerl., PreLaLLOII Department, Public AdminisLrator and Sheriff The original program e•.timated about 47,000 square feet would be necensaty ha:,ed on cuutL sorklod proieetions. Given Lite revised program for added court space and Lite extended plasn umg time, the space "cede will be approximately 62,000 square feet It is likely that in buiw,;,.m for rutarc capacity, a separate. less expense nfIico be,ldnmq rut c,."t or timsa functions may be more desirable. Sncb .m d.•t•u lol•ua'mtt plan will permit the County to make interim use of .•omu Hpnre for other actiyitiva until court workload demand: „ quLru maximum occupancy. In addition, a detailed revi,v of tliu activities of LINO support departments will be done to doturmino if cettain functions can be performed more efficiently and economically in spaco other than at a major justice facility. The bast Valley substation is being expanded this year as part of the interim space program prnsented in the Gruen report. This will provide for 67 employees which will be adequate to serve an unincorporated area population of about 35,000 based on S1%oriff workload. The expanded site at 6th and Mountain also provides a centralized booking facility to the %lest Valley police agencies. It had been anticipated that a new regional substation would be included in the proposed complex. As a result of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff law enforcement services contra -t, the City has indicated a strong desire to have space within its boundaries to house this function which eliminates the need for a centrally located substation. Major unincorporated area growth trends arc in the Chino area. If these areas remain outside of cities, and territory now adjacent to best Valley cities is annexed over the next five to ton years a permanent replacement for the west valley sub- station , in the Chino area may be the most efficient method for providing general law enforcement service. Such a decision need not be addressed at this time, however. liest Valley fail facilities will be ndeguato through 1990 The jail facility located adjacent to the substation at 6th and Mountain currently can hold 25 prisoners. Tho intermediate expansion program recommended by Gruen will be completed later this year and will increase the prisoner capacity to 7.. Tit,, currunt prasot,cr pupulartn+, averaqus about 36 per dal It Ls prnlected that the expanded facility will be adequate as a booking center throuy:t 1990 Detention space for prisoners appuarinq in wuLt %:Ill be built in the now haw and Justice Center This Cecamro_ndatlgu assumes a con - Linued ptisoncr LranaK,rtation uys:Lt.m InAwrun tl,w host Valley and the Central Jail through 1970 eeeause of incroaarng Countywide pauulatiun, br 1990 .add "'Onal pre - sentenced 3ait npacc wall be herded lrc,ediato conutderation Should be yiwn to •.LUdyuol 1I1C Saco and locaatnn for additional jail faeilitLCS. if a is made to construct a major pre - sentenced jail facility n, the Wort Valley, then police agency bookings will be accr.,,.AALCd at a wuw jail and the 6th and Mountain facility will IA abandoned. GCOGRAPHICAL LOCATION or A WCST VALLCY LAW A11D JUSTICC CC:ITCR Land prices in Lhis area are high. Consv,lucntly, if the Count', can find land already in public ownersloiP on wl ich to build a Center, n savings of nearly a million dollars will be achtcvoJ. In reviewing possible sites, it was determined that the County now owns a suitable undevoloped parcel of land at CucaL.onga- Guasti Regional Park. The property was purchased with State Par 1: Dond funds which rosetlet its use to recreational purpoa:s. Representatives of the County have mot with the State Director of Parks and Recreation to explore the potential for using part of this site for a Law and Justice Center The State Director initially indicated that he has a substantial con - eern with respect to the alternative uses of park lands - without providing replacement resources. Ilowover, he was also favorably impressed with the possibility that sore features of a Law and Justice Center on a site adjacent to the park would be compatible with uses for the park program. To address the State's concerns, the Public Works Agency is prepartng a detailed analysis proposing compatible uses of a portion of the Cucamonga- Guasti silo for the Law and Justice Center incorporating common parking, a development program which would empitsize landscaping and public recreation uses of the maximum amount of space, and the possible 'trade offs" of recreational land for that which would be lost to building space. This site at 4th and Archibald in the City of Ontario offers significant advantages for the development of a Law and Justice Center It is centrally located, and it has arterial access from the major best valley population centers. Also, it is in an area which is not yet fully developeL and, therefore, could accomm tuato future court related private sector develop- ment Ue will report the details of an agreement with the State Department of Parks and Recreation for use of tl•is site prior to making any recommendations to incur contractual obligations DCV1;LOP7iClrr COST AND 1 lVA11CL1IG (ILTIIUUS In July, the hoard was presented a fivanLinu report on both the lies[ Valley Law .:nA .it-.t i CC CeIILut and the propogcd Cuun Ll GcvertunrnL Center~ TI.. prol.•cted cost for develop - ment of A 0.aL Valley Law an.l .lu-..LLcv CCIIICr was csLiatcd at $26.2 miltloa prvdtcatcd .•n Lite urtoinal Juvolupment plan a� as presented by Cruen and h but cul.uldaring the alternative situ of Cucamou,,,- ovantt Park. The a.outn tncl_Ird planring and construction al site facilities along with tlae necessary costs to landseat,e .and Complete the park site at Cucamonga - Guasti. The revised program outlined in this report indicates that 2. rather than 17 courts will be needed. new retimatos for the project have been developed rerlecLtng thin And other clrrges A space program providing about 270,000 square feet will cost an estimated $26.7 million. This includes all landscaping necessary to make the facil!ty compatible with the adjacent park. property And development of the remaining State bond purchased park land. A program of this scope needs to be financed at least partially through long -term financing. It is possible to use cash financing for many parts of the program. Thu current budget includes $1.9 million to begin the project. Of the total 826 9 million projected cost, we can cash finance all costs of an office structure, parking, laudecading and development of the park. Those total $6.9 million. As outlined in the July report, this cash financing is possible because the Board has not obligated 810.1 million which was available at the and of 1977 -78. The construction cost for the courthouse building will be approximately 820 million based on escalated costs to 1980 -81. It is recommended that this portion be financed by long -term bonds. The anntal repayment obligation for the bonds would be about 81.6 million per year. Bnsed on the County's past exnorience, it is estimated that this obligation could be met within a cash financed capital improvements program which has boon about 86 million annually A long -term obligation of this amount can therefore bo accOMCMIALCd within the allowable c::ponditurc coiling which may be Imposed on us through Proposition 4. Creation of a joint pmeers authority will allow the sale of bun.l.; at what is litoly to be the lowed intcrert rates UL she Ld prnetcd inaouialel; to eXplule this and any simllar financing arraugcmcnis. PIWIL7T Ul.!.lt... AND . :UI1I.IV;V;tU:I The hest Vallry Law and Ju.Licc Cvnlor will be the largest CUDSILLUCtiw11 pro)cLL uud„taken by Lhc VIIWIL7 Alturnative methods of uup• rva uol Ihr 1nrgram Lo an.e.ure timely C-ar..nletion at tlw lowc : :L poasl.le pi ao ,:: imprral Ltc There ara three: principal metho,h. which are outlived below: _,. a. A conventional system n•.••s an architect to prtlare plans and specifivatl•-,. Then the County supoavises the bidding and direct l; mnnagos tht project. b. A performance plan and specificAtion system requires the bidding contractors to assumble an architectural and engineering team so that design and construction preparation prucued to, other, thereby reducing project construction Mo. C. A construction management approach providas for the County to hire a construction management firm who works with the County, architect and contractor throughout the project. Tito construction manager is the County's representative with principal responsibility for controlling costs. The firm is usually paid a flat fee for this service. Tito County has previously used both the conventional and por- formanco plan methods The construction manager concept has_ recently gained substantial recognition in public entity protects and is widely used in the private sector. The - onstruction management system assists in the preparation and review of bid packages as well as supervising the project during construction by employing various specialists through- out the term of the project. This tends to assure the County of receiving the best techniques of construction, materials and scheduling. The cost of this method varies depending on the amount of service desired and is negotiated on a fixed fee basis rather than a percentage of the project cost. Using this and other negotiated incentives, the construction manager can often complete the program ahead of schedule and for less than originally estimated. In addition, by using an outside firm, the County avoids the expense of adding specialized staff to supervise the project. CC:rm cc: Superior S.outt nuoicip i Court Count; ticak Sheriff Distract Attornvy Public nefcudur Probation M.11:01.11 1'ubltt Admu,iaratnr Law a Justice Agency - Public Works Agency. Auditor - Controllor gg • �yypaap �s�VList GG66�GGGGGG9�Gi~��b 9. - a V I �i►' �� 1:711 �. • ••wn% u' Y E 994 •r -- al. 11s a „3 IIa 38 122a EFL 9 e . ie °. a7 U 19 t. .s Al a ' s .1 E a =gig C ;9x3 a B � @o' ��" d °$ � - a;i All -P. s " E � 8g��6S�d1 ._„ :'..:: 994 •r -- al. 11s a „3 IIa 38 122a EFL 9 e . ie °. a7 U 19 t. .s Al a ' s .1 E a =gig C ;9x3 a B � @o' ��" d °$ � - a;i All -P. s " E � 8g��6S�d1 ._„ r' mil POLICY NO. 3 Policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Buliding and Safety Division SUMECT: TILE ROOF APPLICATIO.v PURPOSE: Protection of property through reduction of wind and water damage to buildings with the roofs For the above purpose, the following policy Is cdopted for all future construction In the City of Rancho Cucamonga All tile roofs composad of brittle, non - flexible materials, such as concrete or clay, shall be installed using the underlay rtyuired by Section 3302 (d) 3F of the Uniform Building Code, regardless of any alternate approval or recommendation to the contrary 6y manufacturer or approval agency Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to be considered as being within a high wind area, and installation of 'TturzicgDG clips^ or similar hold -down devices are to be installed for tile roofs Tareafter applied Dy: I Building Official Date AGENDA - Item 6 -A M E H 0 R A H D U M Date: August 10, 1979 To: City Council and Manager From: Bill Holley Subject: N I C D - Project Esperanza The National Institute for Community Development's Project H.O.Y , under CETA grant funding adminsitered by County Hanpower ery ces, will complete the current funding cycle August 31, 1979 Manpower has extended, through a separate agreement, the funding of the project for an additional 30 days through the month of September There is not a 'guaranteed" and "awarded" funding beyond that point for operction of N I C D 's Project H 0 Y which with the beginning of the new federal fiscal year October Y . will vie for funds under the banner of Project Esperanza (Grant proposal attached ) Charles Chapman, Director of Manpower Services, indicates that the funding of Project Esperanza is 'highly probable' but has not occurred as yet .. 1 C D has requested $7,600 from tho City of Rancho Cucamonga to sup ement the amount proposed to be granted from Manpower Use of this $7,600 would be for the operational support costs, i e , rent, utilities, postage, etc The "particulars" of the project are well known to Council, having been discussed at length at several Council meetings and through various memoranda In light of that. I would b, happ to answer epecitic or general questions regarding those particularq in lieu of repeating previously discussed information Council Options: 1) Grant the request of N I C D 2) Deny request 3) Take no act +on Staff Evaluation Option 1 Should Cout.cil exercise option 1, approval, it would be recommended that the approval be made subject to the following 1) N I C D signs an agreement with City including but not limited to a) Specific and quantifiable services to be performed by N I C D through Project Esperanza; page 1 of 2 page 2 of 2 Memo 8/10/79 to: CC &CM from: B Holley Subj Project Esperanza b) Period of performance; c) Payment method by City of funds; d) Appropriate provisions addressing agreement termination conditions. 2) A not to exceed figure of $7,600 (a feature of agreement would be that all payments would be made di ectl 'o vendor, landlord or utility by City on behalf I C D - Project Eeperanza No cash would e- disbursed directly to N I C D other than reimbursement for mileage expenditures as they occur ) Option 2 Should Council exercise option 2, denial, the chances are probable the N I C D - Project Eeperanza would operate solely with Manpower CETA Grant, with or without this facility it North Town This would be politically unfavorable to City as we would be made the "bad guye" unwilling to try and help the kids from the Barrio Option 3 No action Staff does not see this as viable Staff Recormcndation. While my opinion has not changed regarding N I C D - Project Esperanza's ability to perform as proposed, I feel that with the Project -City agreement we can insure that the program is producing some good results for this Community and protect the City's interest and reputation t•ould the program not perform as agvend, we will terminate agreement with cause The new Project Director, Herminia Martel, may prove to be the proper ingredient needed to finally make program work I hope so I recommend exercising of Option No 1 by Council with conditions as outlined above This will be on the Council a6ends of August 15 If you have any questions prior to that time, please let me know BH%mw M E M O R A N D U M Date: July 3, 1979 To: City Manager and Council From Bill Holley, Director Community Services Subject: Information Onay - Project HOY This morning. Armando Navarro, who addressed Council in April of 1978 on behalf of Project HOY, indicated his intention of requesting from Council at meeting of July 5, several thousand dollars (exact amount had not been determirsd) from the Revenue Sharing allocation to augment his program. Purpose of requested funding would be for rental of the facility, known as the Contact Station, on 24th Street Project HOY has had a vary unstable record of performance since its inception some 15 months ago They are on their fourth project director, at their third location, and viable fundirg is loosing very bleak beyond the fall of this year I do not believe their written records of performance balances against my personal observation and the good faith shown their operation by the City They are setting up c "public relations" session on Tuesday. July 24, 10:00 a m., at the Contact Station, to tell everyone, including the P ress, of their "new" program, and will be inviting Council and Staff as wall I will be in attendance Staff Recommendation Should a request for funding be made, thank Project HOY for it's input and proceed BH /mw Cf, M E M O R A N D U M Date: January 14, 1979 To: Lauren Wasserman From: Bill Holley Subject: Project H.0 Y. Request for Endorsement for Arrowhead Justice Association Grant Funding. Background Project H 0 Y (Help Out Youth) is a CET. VIA Progr -m whose funding will expire in March of this year Purpose of the project, as you know, is a "delinquency prevention" program aimed at the North Town area The City aided the project twice in 1977 by first supplementing their recreation supplies with equipment purchased by City (approx- imately $1700 of the $2000 authorized) and second, by acting as their sponsor for the I M.A. Summer Youth RecreatioD Program Grant (approx- imately $2400) They are currently based at the "Contact Station" on 24th Street in the North Town area, with administrative offices in Ontario The project director is Sam Maeatas, who replaced Lillian Rodriquez The parent organization for H.0 Y. is the National Instit4te for Community Development (N I C D ) of San Bernardino, administered by Armando Navarro Situation As the funding for H 0 Y is due to expire in March, a new funding source is being sought to continue the program A proposal from I C D is attached asking for an "endorsement" by the Council of a "new" program and its goals -- -The West End Cocrprehensive Juvenile Delinquency Prevention Program Sur�ary of Proposal 1) Their proposed program covers three jurisdictions, Ontario, Upland and Rancho Cucamonga 2) It is Project H O Y under a different label 3) It requires no City funding 4) Deadline for proposal is February 1, 1979 -1- memo 1/12/79 Tos L. Wasserman From: B. Holley aubj: Project HOY page 2 Staff r• elation and Recommendation This proposal is lengpthy and constructed of the rhetoric normally associated with a proposal of this nature. Although requested do, bow twice, bolts" t will be dcneandfbyuwhom.acontnues their program locked in lofty coals. tra gining. community priidde. prevent disagreenwi Job stated without challenging the Flag, apple pie, sad motherhood. However, in my opinion, H I.C.D. has not demonstrated tt.rough this proposal a process of achieving those goels Council should be aware that. while this item has not been placed an thethFublic" cocsencasection efoAgenda Navarro equ at an endorsementuby� Council of proposal Council has three basic options: !)) Endorse project as beneficial to the eomsmsnity 2) Reject project endorsement 3) Tntnk them for their presentatiou and Lake no action I recosaend option number 3 request that this info•austional "i m item Only- f forwarded d Council as an or thom etingof January i -2- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA CCNTRACT This contract is entered into in the State of California by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter calle,t CITY, and the National Inst'tute for Community Development - ProJ^ct Esperanza, hereinafter called PROJECT IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City intends to encor age programs of benefit to the community; AND. WHEREAS, the PROJECT tits signified a willingness to undertake a program of benefit to the community through recreational programing, community services and cultural events; AND, WHEREAS, the PROJECT is desirous of City assistance in non - personnel and non- programing support funding; IT IS THEREFORE agreed by the CITY and the PROJECT as follows FIRST The PROJECT agrees to perform, for the benefit of the Community, ±nd for supportive consideration from the CITY, the work and services as herein set forth: ARTICLE I - YOUTH RECREA71ON PROGRAMING A The PROJECT shall offer a program of organized avid scheduled activities which shall include, but not be limited to, the following. 1) Organized and scheduled craft instruction and activities, five hours per week minimum. 2) Organized and scheduled handball instruction and activity, ten hours per weak minimum. -1- 3) Organized and scheduled boxing instruction and activity, ten hours per week minimum. ]) Organized and scheduled tournaments, excluding handball and box.ng, but to in.lude activities such as, but not limited to, table tennis, carroas, table games, etc , two hours per week rtntm=. 5) Organized and scheduled seasonal sports such as, but not limited to, soccer, snftball, basketball, etc., four hours per week minimum. S. The PROJECT shall achieve organized and scheduled average program attendance goa' )f: 1) Thirty participants minimum per day from commencement of this agreement through September 30, 1979 2) Forty participants minimum per day from October 1, 1979, through February 29, 1980: and 3) Fifty participants minimum per day from March 1 1980, through conclusion of Agreemert C. the PROJECT shall operate a youth recreation facility at 10071 Feron Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the benefit of the community, Menday through Friday from the hours of 3:00 p.m. until 8:00 P.M. during the school year, excluding school holidays, and submit for review by May 15, 1990, a summer schedule of operation during school vacation ARTICLE II - REFERRAL FOR SERVICE OR ASSISTA14CE A The PROJECT shall provide a source for citizen referral service or assistance including, but not limited to, wrere information or help regarding consumer protection, legal assistance, owdlcal a ;sistmnce, etc , can be obtained An average of five referral contacts per day will be the program goal -2- ARTICLE III - EMPLOYMENT A The PROJECT shall provide assistance in directing citizens toward employment opportunities The placement of one adult in a career opportunity full -tine employment situation per ronth by the PROJECT shall be the program goal ARTICLE IV - CCWUN1TY CULTURAL EVERTS A The PROJECT shall promote and conduct on a quarter- annual basis, comwonity cultural events, such as. but not limitesd to, guest speakers on topics of general comm,- ^4ty interests, Cisco de Mayo observcnce celebrations, Job Fairs, etc. ARTICLE V - ADMINiSTRATION A The PROJECT shall maintain detailed written recorde of, but not limited to, program activities regarding 1 Program schedules: 2 Program attendance. 3. Program publicity 4. Financial accounting B The PROJECT shall make th.se records immediately available for review by the CITY upon request by the CITY C The PROJECT shall provide to CITY written program summary reports detailing performance of the Agreement with regards to all aspects of it's FIRST provision These reports will be submitted for review by December 15, 1979, March 15, June 15 and September 15, 1980 SECOND: The CiTY agrees to supplement the PROJrCI's Budget in the areas of facility rental, utilities, telephone chirgas, maintenance supplies, office supplies, mileage reimbursement, postage expenses, liability insurance, and copying costs The total CiTY supplement is not to exceed 57600.00. -3- THIRD: Upon the PROJECT and CITY's mutual assent to this contract, CITY will designate a "Contract Administrator'. The Contract Administrator will function as the CITY's primary contact with the PROJECT in imple'nentin£ provision3.ef this agreement. The CITY's Contract Administrator for this Agreement will be William L Holley, Director, Co"rAunity Services Department. FOURTH: The City Council reserves the right and privilege of cancelling, suspending or abandoning the execution of the supplementation of PROJECT's budget by the :ITY should the PROJECT fail to perform in accordance with this Agreement. FIFTH: The terms of this Agreement shall be in force from it's mutual acceptance and execution by the PROJECT and the CITY until September 30, 1980, or until it's abandonment as specified in the FOURTH provision of this Agreement SIXTH The PROJECT shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY, its officers, agents and employees against all liability, claims, lcsses, demands and actions for injury to or death of persons or damage to property arising out of or in consequence of this agrement SEVENTH This Agreement is contingent upon the success of the PROJECT in securing adequate funding to carry out program as proposed in Attachment "A" under the Title VI - Special project provision of the Comprehensive Employment no Training Act, as admini,tered by the Manpower Services Department, County of San Bernardino. -4- National Institute for CocMnity Development Project Esperanza a an ate xecutive Director Date Project Director Date -5- City of Rancho Cucamonga ayor ate City Attorney Date City Clerk Date a 1 r Bin WWI view chaptw hASN ndavy assoccoon of souther chWorm nL 14 December 1979 Honorable Jim Frost, Mayor, and Members, City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PEES Dear Mayor Frost and Council Memberst After reading a letter sent to you dated December 13, 1979, by Superintendent Norm Guith, Central School District, I have the fo13owtng coaments. 1. The $43,000 figure for portable classrooms which I am quoted as making in "gross error• is the highest of three figures provided by Centsel School District last spring. 2. Central School District claims that BIA refused to meet them. This is not true. Central refused to meet with BIA because we wanted to talk about alter- natives to a fee increase. Central only wished to discuss an increase, not alternatives. 3. Before the Central School District can quote coats of portable buildings at $56,000 plus dollars, we should like to demand copies of three separate bids for port- able classrooms. We are informed that the portable classrooms be-ag bought ',y the State of California with the $13 million granted under AN 8 are costing less than $32,000 each. Why does Central need an additional $24,000.007 4. Should this increase be provided Central School District It should only be after: A. An audit of all collected builder fees be provided as is mandatory • snder SO 201. 1150 R 610,Xeav, Ave. BId9 A SW 207 WW 4 CA 91786 (714) 981.2997 M A1S,ta d» NAM and M CB14 B. Such an audit show how much has been spent on ghat. C. The question of *illegally collected• fees (fees collected prior to the enactment of the original ordinance) be answered fully. Sze would like to see a list of all fees collected by tract number with date of collection. If these questions cannot be answered and three honest bids for portable classrooms be provided, we then feel the fee increaso should be challenged. Director December 11, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 791 Rancho Cucamonga, Ch 91710 Attention, City Council The Central school District has attempted to meat with representatives of the Building Industry Association, ealdy View Chapter, and representatives Of the William Lyon Company as requested by the City Council At the WOVamber 7 meeting Unfortunately, the Building Industry ABROCiatim end William Lyon Company have repeatedly refused to meet and discuss the issue of developers' fees under SB 301 The Central school District has carefully studied the information presented to tl•e City Council by Hr Ian Willis, Business Industry Association, in an attempt to develop rationale for a reasonable fee based uprul the provisions of Government Code 65970 to 6S979. The Central School District is willing to concede that the growth in student en- rollment experienced in September, 1979, was due, in part, to returnees from p•ivate schools Pue to the elimination of double sessions However, anrollmant has increased, and will continue to increase, as a direct resulz of the develop - cant of recently approved, or to be approved, dwellin7 wits. The Central School District interprets Government Code Section 65974 to mean that the fees paid 'Should bear A reasonable relationship to the needs for schools caused by the development ' In referring to a letter to the City Council from the Building Industry Association on November 7, 1979, Hr. Willis indicates clearly th.1t the original number of building permits. 718, would produce 141 children Wr Willis further states correctly that five classr000s are needed to house the 147 students However, Hr Willis grossly underestimates the COSt of five class- rooms set up with utilities, furniture, and equipment at $41,000 each During fact finding cormittee meetings in the Spring of 1979, it was incorrectly estimated that portable classrooms could be installed for approximately $41,000 each. In actuality, the costs to the Central school Oietriet for four portable classrooms installed on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus are enumerated on the following page. CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOqA AMERCED SCHOOL VALLI VISTA SCHOOL 7935 Ard'b.td Ave. 7611 Hellmen An. 10171 Palo ARo St. 7727 Vane Viva Who Td 714-987.7341 LL 714.987 -1788 Tel 727410.1600 Td 714-9812697 A, 4OfT IM 1.16 A I%,",. 1had at CENTRAL `.4L . Tarim. a s r-&a" 0 OS Skw6er SCHOOL I ; Di.. J wde a, ileMer DianaK wris .nfeier DISTRICT it d Nerr.a. G 0.0e, Ed D.Saaes.Wede.r d 1 3.ptM AdA, ,aa. A MAnry.Amna 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga. COMOlnla 91770 Tel. 714.989.8541 December 11, 1979 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 791 Rancho Cucamonga, Ch 91710 Attention, City Council The Central school District has attempted to meat with representatives of the Building Industry Association, ealdy View Chapter, and representatives Of the William Lyon Company as requested by the City Council At the WOVamber 7 meeting Unfortunately, the Building Industry ABROCiatim end William Lyon Company have repeatedly refused to meet and discuss the issue of developers' fees under SB 301 The Central school District has carefully studied the information presented to tl•e City Council by Hr Ian Willis, Business Industry Association, in an attempt to develop rationale for a reasonable fee based uprul the provisions of Government Code 65970 to 6S979. The Central School District is willing to concede that the growth in student en- rollment experienced in September, 1979, was due, in part, to returnees from p•ivate schools Pue to the elimination of double sessions However, anrollmant has increased, and will continue to increase, as a direct resulz of the develop - cant of recently approved, or to be approved, dwellin7 wits. The Central School District interprets Government Code Section 65974 to mean that the fees paid 'Should bear A reasonable relationship to the needs for schools caused by the development ' In referring to a letter to the City Council from the Building Industry Association on November 7, 1979, Hr. Willis indicates clearly th.1t the original number of building permits. 718, would produce 141 children Wr Willis further states correctly that five classr000s are needed to house the 147 students However, Hr Willis grossly underestimates the COSt of five class- rooms set up with utilities, furniture, and equipment at $41,000 each During fact finding cormittee meetings in the Spring of 1979, it was incorrectly estimated that portable classrooms could be installed for approximately $41,000 each. In actuality, the costs to the Central school Oietriet for four portable classrooms installed on the Cucamonga Junior High School campus are enumerated on the following page. CENTRAL SCHOOL CUCAMONGA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL DOqA AMERCED SCHOOL VALLI VISTA SCHOOL 7935 Ard'b.td Ave. 7611 Hellmen An. 10171 Palo ARo St. 7727 Vane Viva Who Td 714-987.7341 LL 714.987 -1788 Tel 727410.1600 Td 714-9812697 City of Rancho Cucamonga Decenher 13, 1979 Page 2 Pour classrooms per bid 0 $44,989.70 . $179,959 Necesaary Installation, Paving 5,373 Electrical 10,408 Fencing around trra,sforcan 362 Pin alarm 300 Clocks and bells 2,200 9,850 Plumbing 6.000 2.083 Furniture 24,723 IWAL 6,332 $213,014 The fifth classroom to be Installed will cost approximately $56,922.70 and 1s enuserated as follows, One Portable per bi.; 0 44,;89 70 Necessary Installation, Paving 3,750 Electrical 2.600 Plumbing 3,000 Clocks, bells, fire alarms Soo -- 9,850 runitura 2.083 TMN' 56,922 70 Please note that the installation of the four portable classroom plus the addl- tional portoole classroom necessary due to the increase in students from the 238 home results in a total expenditure to the school district of $269,936 70. In retroape:t, the "oe should have appropriately been $1,134 for each of the 238 homes Nowrver, $94,432 has been collected ftom the 104 home that have already drawn permity, leaning 134 homes yet to draw permits The total cost of $269,936 less the amen: wlleeted, $94,432, divided by 134 dwellirg units establishes a $1,310 foe required to raise the necessary $175,504 for the project The Central School District is withdrawing the original request for nine double - wide modular classroom to provide housing for students who bear no reasonabl.. relationship to new home construction The Central ScEwl District hereby requests an increase in davelopers• faes $1,110 per dwealtng unit to be applied to the Insulting 134 dwelling units in order to provide school housing for those students resulting from the development Sincerely, •/ d No C w Guithi[h. EC. D. Superintendent City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA M E M 0 R A N D'UM Date: December 28, 1979 To: City Council /City Manager From: Harry Empfy� Subject: School Fel`as Since the Inception of school fees, the City of Rancho Cucamonga S -s received $84,748.00 $17.S4P.00 was turned over to the City by the Alta Lana School District. Early In the fiscal year the City Council authorized the release of $38,600 00 to the Alta Lam School District, leaving a balance of $46,148 00 on the City's books. The Alta Loan School District Is now asking that the City release the balance of the funds being held by the City, as was originally Intended. • However, should Council wish to release these funds, It wil be necessary to obtain an Indemnifleation agreement from the Su:ool District in the event that school fees are ultimately declared Illegal. Even with this agreement, the School District may not be In a position to return the school fees, since It is likely that the money w 11 have been expended as planned, for temporary facilities This would put the burden squarely on the City, since it will ba the City's responsibility to return the fees to the developers. Even now, the contingent liability exists to the City to wy bath those fees, and will continue to exist until such time as a decision is made as to the legal position of school fees. Attached Is a copy of a letter from our City Attorney expressing `,Is concerns about the school fees 110 COVINGTON G C'ROWE nrrowucre wr ♦ww ua, wc), u.rw etwan r "'•�C « ...o u•e.x hw un.au .• «vu ..o.. rorar orrwc raox •au N�l O.... ".C., . " m w...rm•n *• owrwwIo. cwu rowwi^onec oo «wo a r C . ✓« w..n ...•v.. .e.•�a • •o•.a• December 19, 1979 ve•« «wr.... Harry J. Empey, Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: School Fees Dear Harry: Reference is made to your letter to me date& Decer• o, 1979 regarding School Fees. I believe that the reason the Council released 10.00 on June 20, 1979 is that the Alta Loma School D only requested release of that specific sum. Before the City releases all or any part of the balance to the School Districtn, the City should obtain indemnification agreements. Indemnification. agreements were previously prepared by this office and I believe that one was signed in connection with tha first release of funds to Alta Loma School District. As you know, the California Attorney General's office has issued an opinion to tale effect that Schcol Fees collected under Senate Bill a.o. 201 are a "special tax• which may not be imposed without an election. I understand that there are court cases in progress wherein this issue will be determined. The City Council may, under the circumntances, elect to re- tain the balance of the School Fees until such time as then i is a final appellate court determination of the issue. In• demnification by the School Districts may have little practical value to the City should it turn out that the School District(s) have insufficient furds for that purpose. Very truly yours, BC�TICHU. CUCAM��71 0 ort E. Dougherty �_/j Assistant City Attorney • . RED:cec AGENDA �,�oPv1n A CITY OF RUiCHO CUCAtIONGA Regular Meeting Carnelian Elementary School tlulti- Purpose Room 7105 Carnelian October 3, 1979 AGENDA ITEMS -- NOTL: All Stems submitted for the City Council agenda mist ho in writanq The deadline for submitting Mess is 5100 p.,. on the Thursday prior to the first and third nednesday of each month. The Clty Clerk's office receives ail such items 1 CALL TO ORDER A PLEDGE TO FLAG B ROLL C�LL -, Palombo x , Schlosser BrldgeX M1k�j�s Frost. yr- }r,`�f C APRR(IyAL OF'N[Et(OTESt � iFt�76, September 8, and September 19, 1979. v + 2 ANNOUNCEMENTS a Council j b. Staff 3 CO;41I1TEE REPORTS a Advisory Committee b Historical Conmiision :Y 4 CONSENT CALENDAR: Th•• following Consent calendar Mans are expected to bo roaming and nrn- ctin[roverslal Vey will be acted upon by the Council a[ ano Y tirm without discussion. Any Council memMr, staff member, or ,nturestod puty m,1y r,gcest that en its, be removed from the Cun—nt Calendar for later discussion. a Approval of Warrants - Register He 79 -10 -3 - S229,604 85 1 b. Refer claim against the City by Steve Aeschlimann to the City Attorney for handling Amount 3 of claim unknown at the time. c Set public hearing for October 17, 1979 for an ordinance 5 establishing a Design Review Committee and criteria for architectural rr.. review of develupments within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. d Rcquest authorization to open escrow proceedings for the purchase of Parcel 2 6 t of Heritage Park. Purchase price - $83,853.00; funds are included in current budget from the Park Development Fund. City Council Agenda -2- October 3, 1979 4 Consent Calendar (continued) e Release of the following bonds: 8 Tract 9121 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the southwest corner of 13th St. and Haven Avenue. Owner Lewis Homes of California. Performance bond (road) $140,000 Performance bond (water) 43,000 Performance bond (sewer) 25,000 Tract 9245 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the west side of Haven Avenue between n U 19th St. and So Pacific Railroad tracks Owner Lewis Homes of California Performance bond (road) 5122,000 Tract 9324 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the south side of Hillside Road between Jasper Street and Carnelian Street Owner: Griffin Development Co Performance bond (road) $268,000 Performance bond (water) 36,000 Tract 9421 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the northwest corner of Banyan Street i and Amethy ;t street. Owner: Foa Hollow Limited Partnership Performance bond (road) $ 90,000 Tract 9422 -2- Accept roads and release bond - Located on the west side of Turner Avenue south v of Church street SOwner: h Marlborough Development Corporation 'n Performance band (road) S162,000 n U l� 0 City Council Agenda -3- October .f, 1979 4 Consent Calendar (continued) f Award bid for four 4 -door Ford Fairmounts to Citrus Motors The city has been notified that Arena Fora cannot meet the bid whicn was approved by Council on 9 -19 -79 It is, therefore, recommended that the bid be awarded to the second lowest bidder, Citrus Motorsaat a total cost of $23,949 15, and to dLcept a letter of with- drawal from Arena Ford g Request to participate in a Deferred Compensation Program for Rancho Cucamonga employees RESOLUTION NO. 79 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNG4, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE E%ECUTIUN Or AGREEMENTS RELATED TO SAID PLAN h Acceptance of Parcel Map 5044 The Parcel Map was tentatively approved on May 7, 1979 RESOLUTION 110. 79 -78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5044 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 5044) 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. An Ordinance Establishing the Residential Growth Management P an On September 19, the City Council discussed various issues and alternatives to the Plan and directed staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce, Building Industry Association, and all other concerned citizens to try to resolve the remaining issues of the Plan. Staff has met with these groups and individuals and has received posit Yli nput ORDINANCE N0. 86 reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, (I ESTABLISHING A GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TO REGULATE NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN ✓"_ nor rrry nr n.u�un �.,�...,..... ro 16 17 18 20 Qed, A 4C City Council Agenda -4- October 3, 1979 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) A resolution establishing a Residential Assessment Rating System. RESOLUTION NO. 79 -74 �- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM FOR REVIEW OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY Negative Declaration and Zone Lhan a No. 79 -08 - 22 Meridian Construct on Change o zone rom - (limited agritilture) to N -2 (heavy industrial) for 38 56 acres of land located on the north side of Arrow, approximately 1,300' east of Interstate 15 Recommendation The planning Commission reconmends that the City Council adapt Ordinance No 88 approving the issuance of a Negative Declaration and Zone Change No 19 -08 ORDINANCE NO 88 (first reading) Z9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COU14CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASS°- SSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 229 - 021 -59 FROM A -1 TO M -2 FOR 38 56 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW, 1,300' EAST OF INTERSTATE 15 C. Re uest for an Ordinance Es tabu shin a Rancho Cucamonga 30 A v sory Conn ss on referred to the CitytCouncirecommended or consideration No be The ordinance includes a statement on the general role of the Advisory Commission, composition of membership. terms of appointment, removal of members, meetings, officers, and minute taking. ORDINANCE NO 87 (first reading) 32 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- CALIFORNIA, CREATING AN ADVISORY C014MISSIOIJ TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COtPIISSION City Council Agenda -5- October 3, 1979 • 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) D. Vacation of a Portion of Banyan Stree. Tract 9444. 34 This is the second phase Of bandunment of a portion of Banyan Street from Amethyst to 300 feet easterly The are. to be abandoned is being replaced by relocation of Banyan through the tract development of Tract No 9444 Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution No 79 -77 ordering a portion of Banyan Street to be vacated RESOLUTION NO. 79 -77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CAL:j CgNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS SHOWN ON A MAP (NO. V -003) ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. Request from Advisor Committee for Re eal of Ordinance No 78 Prov d ng for the Sa e o Safe and Sane Fireworks 41 /V On September 20 the Advisory Committee reviewed the existing city ordinance providing for the sale of safe and sane fire- works in the city Request for reconsideration of the ordinanceC� came from the Advisory Committee and "" eo -` -- �i B. Approval of Contract for Services with MKGK to Prepare Fiscal Impact Model far the C ty of Rancho Cucamonga This is continued from the September 19 City Council meeting Council had requested that changes be made in 0e contract This has been accomplished C. Request Authorization to Update Telephone System in City Hall The present system being used is too small and outmoded To Improve the system would cost $2,320.60 to install. This would reduce the number of key sets and provide 16 outside trunk lines (presently the -e are 10) and 80 internal stations (presently there are 40) it is recommended that the budget item under the City hill function for the alarm system be redesignated to update the phone system Also recommended for the Sherlt " s Department to approve $454 35 from the contingency funJ to provide addition of 43 46 w 9 • 9 IE67 CITY OF 2ANCH0 CUCAMONGA kARR I VEN A V E N 0 0 R N A H E H H A r r MARR DATE Register No 79 -IC -3 NET 61,149.500 •1,513.80 ?96.00 65.72 60.00 976.00 2, 732.00 2,000.00 352.00 352.07 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 60.00 20.00 382.55 - 38.71— 5,0 2 3,1 3,4 1 2 R267 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA WARR N VEN I V E N C 0 R N A M. E DATE NET C2523 8395 SCUTHERN CALIF GAS CG 10/07/79 26.81 0 524 02525 8390 8475 SCUTHLANC PAPER CO SPARKLETTS 10/03/79 `0/03/79 139.31 100.09 02526 8470 SPECIALTY TYPEWRITER SV 10/03/79 10/03/79 45.00 02527 02528 8525 8700 STATIONERS CORP THE EMPIRE CO 10/03/79 84.15 32.00 02529 87U2 T1/0 MPSON AS SOC OEVEL CO W/W INSTANT PRINTING 10/03/79 10/03/79, 2,350.00 57.72 C2530 02531 SITS 9490 WILLIAM CUTHBERT INC 10/03/79 440.00 02532 9995 YUKON DISPOSAL SERVICE 10/03/79 10/03/79 40.00 02533 02534 9999 VOID LEE NEOICAL SERVICE FINAL TCTALS 10/03/79 314.62 229,604.85 -a^ i • lJ 4 �_ n LA i! 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA NEMORANDUN Date: October 3, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Jack Lem, Director of Cocmunity Development Subject: CONSMT CALENDAR Please place the following item on rho Consent Calendar: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND DESIGN REVIEU ORDINANCE - An Ordinance establishing a Design Revitw Committee and criteria for architectural review of developments within the City of Rancho Cucamcrgn. Set public Fearing for October 17, 1979. MiEM10RANDU$1 Septcmbor 27, 1979 0 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Subject: Heritage Park, Escrow on Parcel 2 Request authorization to open escrow proceedings for the purchase of Parce 2 of Heritage Park Purchase price, as agreed last year, will be 83,853 00 Funds are included in current budget from the Park Development Fund Request Consent Calendar Item on October 3 for Council Consideration attachment BH /mw G 2 0 ri L i ;I. 107S7,two a, e %oc CGc,1;lolvc -ft �� f /Cl °ISSTE. /10 ASSCCIATIC: y Mg Rav P 1 .f n ARC�L 9 9:L LOT 7 t t a PARCEL .3 a Q 9042 acresv LOT 8 n {� 3 I `— g0l:41 132C. 1 I v "•1 /VY] /V STFcLrT I�1 17"d 11 NOT.: Ar /•. +» d••IJnrrJ .nd YN Sa.rn• � 1 , .h.. � nrrran ire Nird ' l� •-••S 1'0.:...a ` Sfn[f" 100' FARW SITE uu �o: •.� f'ErrBERT F HILL 51DE 8 SCA I L I'9' S &N GERf7ARDINO 6�✓i1% G � R1c7(cR ccu PU9L1C WORKS AGENCY awtcl:w TA•:cLwa �IIR ' FICE S.X. q r.. ....u•.. •n.... ... Ja.yVVzU e• l ... M•p6 91TOI77 ,QTY ■ Y- CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM 0 DATE: October 3, 1979 TO: City Council 6 City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, Cit9 Engineer SUBJECT: CONSENT CALENDAR - RFLEASE OF BONDS Tract 9121 - Accept -oade and release bonds Located on tie southnest corner of 13th Street and Haven Avenue CWNiR: Lewis Homes of California P 0. Sox 670 - Upland, California 91765 Performance Bond Road) $140,000 Performance Bond Water) E 43,000 Performance Bond Sewer 5 25,000 NOTE: The sanitary sewer and water sjstems were approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on February 22. 1979 The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs Tract 9245 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the west side of Haven Avenue between 19th Street and the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks UdNER Lewis Homes of California P 0. Box 670 Upland, Cal fornia 91786 Performance Bond (Road) $122,000 NOTE: The road construction has beer approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, walls and street signs 1 AF Bond Releases Page 2 • October 3, 1979 Tract 9324 - Accept roads and release bonds Located on the south side of Hillside Road between Jasper Street and Carnelian Street OWNER: Griffin Development Company P. 0. Box 488 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Performance Bond 'cad) $268,000 Performance Bond (Water) $ 36,000 140TE: The sanitary water system was approved by the Cucamonga County Water District on November 6, 1978 The road construction has been approved as being in accordance _ with the road improvement plans and it is -eco mended that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, sidewalks, wails and street signs Tract 9421 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the northwest corner of Banyan Street and Amethyst Street OWNER: Fox Hollow Limited Partnership P 0. Box 397 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Performance Bond (Road) $90,000 NOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it ii• recommended that the roacs be accepted The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, sid- walks, walls and street signs Tract 9422 -2 - Accept roads and release bond Located on the rest side of Turner Avenue south of Church Street OWNER: Marlborough Development Corporation 2029 Century Park East, Smite 1550 Los Angeles, California 90067 Performance Bond (Road) S162,000 TOTE: The road construction has been approved as being in accordance with the road improvement plans and it is recommended that the roads be accepted. The improvements include curb, gutter, paving, fyyt� sidewalks, walls and street signs. t il -�- TRA/S T NCB. 9'-)21 IN 11N/n'C67PORAM TERR /TOR / OF THE COUNTY O.' JAN BERNARD /NO BEING A SUBDIVISION YS B aC60ROS 6 fTNE CIX/NTY OF SANA� SECT /ON JS. T.rNjt BERMARDWO, STATE OF CALIfWN /A , AACREASEN fNGB/EfR /!/G CO. :G:LE' /••60' MARCH 1976 M1 MI /eI U'.w'tNmLM I x{TU eII LI�v IALi tf4 Ir N: lL /NA ��[G nSM_°7EE� w,aw2L• M 57F E t .� ru Lw.e r.y.0 — •i _ _cars.•— ETRCET) J )i�nsape (N /Nf7EEHTN 'e'uar.a aw •Ii .rwtr+ '• . Ym rs ` om r am nm eY ..cm u :: w•" �ul� 16 k` to i to = R .4 II /J• /I �R.rjM yFT '%r .tl• 7• p m• t _ Jrr n ♦ o', p 1 um Ym .m m n.. .ury M •• .• .. GALA �A %ENUCL. '. Q.. ♦�ar V rt �� rJ 11i •v = r7 ': rs la J! a Jo _l uswrrr ann �.J1Lt�!�ga xm nm 4n bS\Y. I F r Yr r. a J7 •F:� J�I-� +t i•i ' tI �Jl Pu "�;. 1 „ t �.: I e , ! -..`- eJ1 Y•I:" �L�r'�� -j11,TT3aa� ©-- •, �VVV .Li ' �.l.L' . � Js i • <' � "•.✓.w ' �M /L� STR.;fT i'r 5 y a. : .n,.rf/C�1 ��i.•���� TFa.� — .�E'�— ..., --. •air °'� y�= t �a 1 p l'la l it f i7 a �w is♦lF .J } r. ai t'Sa• w. l z ge ! v4G Jo n wJ • /% /T � /r � /I P L ♦ i •y MIL t,�> �F 2{ �ryri1 rryy�noss ? y A •wi a .. t 'Q 9 r y !` aY!•`j}�1 JI �;ie+! � J+!' � !7 �F !! i\r-•I L �I�yy •. ` t Tt Y Y Md 1 /I 1• � -��0 � .Lm n�J� Lrm 4rt _ g1'II nL •.4• d J� �o-ir.L .•C_ .. i �= `ti.'w / .t Iw. JlIJ ..w.Y /u TRACT NO. 9245 N ONINCORROBArfw rlrRR1r"r P• SAN B£RNApOINO COONrV Bf /NC • SUBOIVISILN' W RORrION3 OF THE SC ✓• ('/ rNC NC I/• AND rNf Nf '/1 OV rN[ If I/I SCC! /Ln JS rIN.RIW SBGM, RCCMOS Cr • //C COL•Tr OF SAN B[RNAIiOINQ SLAT[ OF CAL /lONMIA ANORfASCN fNCIN£fRINC CO .CAL£ 1••AO' L/ARCN.,178 ((( r••�.•„°„ aANr1 _ Ji... mow•• N.n•r _ - y••n... mr �w.n. .e•.sr] •ww ��.•. i t/ ea a �� 7• + -ia 71�yys�d� iC .v n 1.0 411, O tel: r t d M : O )) :' I � • w �� I �t ` �—j _ w;)r, ew• u w � ;. �.•I =.:row: •f •rwy�Y .; w I:•.Y +.>• r:' W Y. Y www ... i=. � 1 y � : i • j1 ro , ..,.r w�i �•.\.• �::••:.r.�n.. _ . ` ". •.,rte •Mia"Y / � A 7 1 I • fu..Y• Mr•a •rfr•. «_•.• • I r; ;rrrY • • Y. Yawn Mu \YY Y. 7 d 7 t � • : ice. =•Yr..:•.. ^w. n. w....a .ul. r.r..•... _ F • • t � •.Y.•U•• (•rrr i T. • .1 \ •���yi.�i ilal 0 r: •w.i• /`�. �f.w NMI w•. rr �I1. • I/ e {jam i 0 Wm ) � u, sal � t<p.•z;r__�_�, , � � rr r••r! 1 • � •Y t \ a' r I Y� 1 5 W L � 2 • Bo TRACT 24 f•f•l fCl f,.ffn N O. 9324 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO «U... wl LUl•J V IOb f s Ir Kfr. la tti•wi! nW UKKIUIU. 14faa 1U N •Ya 14 LL[Ld R W 6GaLlli [P•rt;r w1n V f+� I.MC 1 .rsou • .uon•n, uc >' W • _ IZ., m » ay. 1 V nn nYaap r r.[ .,. •:-.a..« u i {L;•iu tr. IL– 9, wn orrr.n[ wrd. a= I ♦ ..>u:a ro.o .i rl•- S,ir I v tL s f' I• L Ir r v ' ^IM• a i c ] 1 siC\I na r as 8, a a � VI.w. r n fY•+ •f +`FISyr~��� \ fO niJ'7• r 7� 4!l • — i�.i�•r- fIr 1 a` 3•'• as s M t �` Y •Y 14 c41S�y •� rrry,,.r_ .1 • {f7 ouumRV ECLAT• i u u u I v 1 4 •i 0 49 { o-alnn•r lSff. •' rf UltU fV YrIG T •R m VR 0. UW.0 m {I. \r.uyr r• s b. \ ♦I nRUr d W fiWYIYO f6lrr UtirOnf Y� .re u u I v 1 4 •i 0 49 { o-alnn•r lSff. •' rf UltU fV YrIG T •R m VR 0. UW.0 m {I. \r.uyr w.. a sw. a [un ro u ufo.a. v lw..•• nau ... b. \ ♦I nRUr d W fiWYIYO f6lrr UtirOnf IWIUTU MY11VaT IfVf f.r lgia. >' W • _ IZ., m » ay. 1 V nn nYaap r r.[ .,. o I. Uref fSYIr VIR nC'lLLii )[{ » Iql w :A vaire— Y "-% Waco • r. e. luu vo atw nn[ua r..om ).vas. wn orrr.n[ wrd. a= tm. 1,; ; eN VrPI M[[ R • w I. M•f. f 4a oW � '() T , 'ACT rat®. 9524 IN THE COUNTY OF SAN OERNAROINO Alt • WPI"1 {I? (� IOn . • Ir WK• 1+ M•w' -' w•r '. +nwcl•rlo- IAaI w�na. vco-nr. i. .o rya urv» o- {•+ vaaw rarr. r•n a r:.vvrru t.ur rel .t.un Msoll a •"oc" "l ut I +agnW Mn � M • 3 � I k,9 � M. ii i T' 6 Ri:ry:i's•} uaa {L-- 1 ' MILLHO[ V • '•••° polo is ns•• r ^ U ai _ •f .++..-�m1 �' 't:.. «r••... n wrr.r. I�1 � > tl� . tl • .•a \ ` � ••t � {_ + t 3 �L� a • • tla a Y u -• T Y 'A1 la : N S € AS '� j 'r t . I ar `• a jtlt_i_ I' as •''• .'t ^t, IV _' } I•^'p -`E ,•'� F �.ar y..�.r _. ` • q. Cl,,,.I.. r to �..d -s •„ �.f• t' � > puw� q l +t1r �• S 1 r-i `�� . _ •��r9'}�.. r __•. �_�i � t•fipltt Nftnv )!I {11R 4 IEI( al %a aJ ae i TRACT N©. 9421 'N"' asauno acta[s IN ix[ ctlr 0r { {MONO c0c{,o,cA ON 44 uur"Nt{ 8[lV- A 1t'NIPI110N cr P..111M K toys rl WO 17. ROce 10 mwoO k KO Shin ASSCCIArtON AS rt CCr"0 I, 8001 8 of MAPS. PACE 18 IEC"OS " THE cClNtr " SAN ttA,A{DI,3 STATE at ciurOA.tA —i AA.: ^ W 9J2J Ha 'M/Y -Yd I _i 'U 1, I h �� I Rr• I iJ id _ �• NNNIANrrA .a 34 P 3e �r Ir iS Gy 3S i I N -JyAA Iz _ o J1 t ury Y Cp / lz t li a u .�Nu..Y 31 3I bi] ^ u U .r I At . •UNr10N(4 9 jtu i 30 i 14 I ... �v.., .+ f in+ A= lu vl i 29 IS 25 S to • i ; ..s �. �.. ANeU zJ Jir Ste' ; 1•'ur_ :ea aY to t iii is ; ,` �,,�� 26 tt ,qA'• 19 3 `5� �y Y-Y ` �` l —.�_ LLSwiFt i�SHfc�•J t i i 24 23 22 ® t gym- -�' • �V_ � 21 •i IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BER "ARrjINO 4.1 KC -Y•.- f •w •.G✓ +ii •r -p•.y p \n..w... �C . sue•-• ' _ rJY n Ca tur • • — a e D D D A n T s a D 1' [ T ene Ilett ntf' wv .e f'I waa,,.ww I Sg •IY �at ,m��I �1 yT ,Irt P,+IU„ u v-•.. .• fZi 1 1/L b'1 J. .♦ •I Dona P „a au, I pie�n tI9 Z:. wr•r- ^� i. - -L1_ S i• .Iin.. -t tJ to . ..•.y,p,�elpm� n n 19 ♦ n a n a .I .' ,• wr •n .o _ pp ~'a IM1 0111 � '1�tfyl.,• 'y'.L HiD �C•. e�N,•iq. ' a . T 1 rr ^�`O `' •M1 •4U1 > v.�lr•e:, p I „ t , r T ,S `_o= a }j Yu. L`�q'- -'•” ": - T t is\w,t11 n,tc, b0E_ a q v a`� -a..n J / ^T It J>l.Jl � tat rT1 n�n1 j"a T'- f17LrC7 iJ9.:c,n hl.A U' /. i if aNi -b ' "+ nR ♦. !l•l t4t .l �1 ,• I,r �� I COY•{T r. ; PAM •qr - u r l • rpT • �.�� '. _• is <n,r. 'G +wc- � ' I S{DCCT a I 1 8 I..oe+t Mot• I > . ,,,.v I tea >, __— �� - -" •W" " •'- at.r� n __ _ spa a on•�c wo *ea .I , .. ., •_ �• Mr��`f✓/ .ten ay •L t• .... ..- �' ^h'�C.�.�L1 .1.4.1 MEH0RAHOUH September 28, 1979 TO: City Council - City Manager FROM: Harry Emp;y "'� SUBJECT Deferred Compavation Some of the City staff has indicated that they may wish to participate in some type of deferred compensation plan, to more effectively make use of their disposable income. In order for this type plan to be implemented a resolution must be passed adopting the plan and authorizing the execution thereof Please be aware that the plans being reviewed require no participation of City funds, that the employees will provide the amount deferred from their own resources. 0 HJE:cak ►1 u 1� 0 RESOLUTION NO 79 -79 A RESOLU110N OF THE CITY COUNCIL Ot THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN EMPLOYEES' DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AND AUTHOPIZIHG THE EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS RELATED TO SAID PLAN WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga gas in its employ employees who are and will be rendering valuable services to the City; and WHEREAS, said employee may desire to defer income until retirement for the purpose of deferring Federal and State Income Taxes on said income; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has considered the establishment of a Deferred Compensation Plan for the said employees and believes that the adoption of said Plan will enhance the efficiency and morale of the employees and will be in the best interests of the City; and WHEREAS, it is intended that said Plan shall be in accordance • with Federal and State law and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it would be for the benefit and in the best interests of the City to approve the proposed Deferred Compensation Plan this day submitted to the City Council NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the City Council establish said Deferred Con.Densation Plan for said employees of the City and that said Deferred Compensation Plan this day submitted to the City Council, which is attached he•eto as Exhibit "A" be, and the same is hereby approved and adopted, to be a °reLtive October 3, 1979, and to remain in effect unti, terminated by further resolution of the City Couh.il BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Manager is hereby appointed to administcr the Plan on behalf of the City and is authorized to execu Participation Agreements with eligible officers, officials and employees, and all other Documents ano Agreements necessary to implement and administer the Plan ATTEST PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT City Clerk I-7 F�yo� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATr: October 3, 1979 City Council 6 City Manager a At1: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 5044 The subject Parcel Map was tentatively approved on May 7, 1979 At that time, the ultimate right of way width required for 6th Street was 66 feet. In August, 1979, the Council determined that the width of 6th Street should be 88 feet in this area. However, the construction s 6th Street at the subject location was already completed and we were unable .ke an adjustment. This map will make it possible for the owner, Reynolds Ai num, to sell the vacant parcel for future industrial development. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the map of Parcel Map 5044 and authorize the City Engineer to present the same to the County Recorder. Respectfully submitted, yj�� /114&6 ff� Lloyd B Hubbs /" City Engineer LBH deb F] Lq TENTATAVE PARCEL YilAl? INTO. 804A IN THE eaY OP ErEUGHO t71:d HON4t. -LEN DECNdC'DINO e' UHT'f E M-OIOII Or rArLL� 1, I9reLL MEP N0. Elbq PACetr. HAP w' c 47 -pp ear p I' c» GULIMGue..d• SAN DCciamwO - - 40UHr -C uIIAOMA - YnGlurrr Har - OwHLcl NO[Cie, b�e49 {11MI40H »j. LveLtle, uH[ tAnl rr 1. C.6) P)l -rctP urulns wL' {[l LYYN.IL fA14 }'� •MIt! P{r PIw[(ihN +lNej L[JYM �ITtf )NT OA* f >/JT.([[ 4w. ell U rt Hr : elr.tt[L r4{r..c lvu ' � L t/M�rG(NNO 011 M4 t. jalWLi APL[L •I . t +P latlta -a • t[e 1 aunt hurt P!}lw - �' •'• -LLL i LLC....de t(L OSVL } l _ ,01t— . -LL,ti R ] \ .Y \ w< pie tl._Ib Ci.q /Ott3� NTir Mc1Wa0 .�O }�[[ Al \ 1 rro.riso a•. „rvnrn 1 {b'. c q y ;.r[ to � >t I I- \ �1 I m r� i 4 9 O n wy '3 4s 4� i< 4 t aj a RESOLUTION NO 79 -78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP NU14BER 5044. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5044) WHEREAS, tentative parcel map number 5044, submitted by Lou Civerolo and consisting of two parcels, located on the north side of 6th between Archibald and Turner, being a division of Lot 1 of Parcel Me No 4130 was approved by the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and, WHEREAS, Parcel flap Number 5044 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and, WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel flap Number 5074 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record • PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _ day of . 1979 AYES NOES: ATTEST a MMIT City e 20 Mayor • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: October 3, 1979 To: City manger and City Council Prom: Jeck Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN At their meeting of September 19, 1979, the City Council held the first public hearing on the Growth Management Plan. The Council discussed various issues and alternatiaes to the plan and directed staff to work with the Chamber of Commerce, Building Industry Association and all other concerned citizens to try to resolve the remaining Issues of the Plan. Ste:f has met with those groups and individuals and has received positive Input to the plan. Because of the short time available, Staff was not able to prepare a comprehensive report for the Council, but will have this report ready prior to the meeting. Re. pa�pct1fully �su�bb(,m'it/t{ /ed, -� �VTiL•'�� JACK LAM. Director of Community Development JL:BNH:nm ZI 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MENDRANDUH Data: October 3, 1979 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AIM ZONE CHANGE N0. 79 -08 - MERIDIAN CCNST TION - 'he change o: zone from A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to N -Z Heavy Industrial) for 38 56 acres of land located on the north side of Arrow, approximately 1,300' cast of Interstate 15 The Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 12, 1979, recommended approval of the Negative Declaration anJ Zone Change No. 79 -08 for Meridian Construction Subject property In located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 1,300' east of Interstate 15 and borders the vest boundary of Big -3 Industries (Exhibit "A ") TFe site is presently vacant and lies in the heart of the City a industrial • area Surrounding land use and zoning is as follaws: Land Use Zontns North Vacant land and I -15 A -1 South Industrial Development H -2 East Industrial Development M -2 vest Vacant land and I -15 A -1 U Subject property and all surrounding properties are general planned for major industrial uses The applicanta have Intention, to subdivide the property end sell for Industrial development The subject property is large enough to accommodate uses permitted in the pro- posed zone In addlt :on, uses permitted in the proposed zone are compatible and consistent with present and future uses In the surrounding area. As required by the State Planning and Zoning laws, the zone change retiucst is consistent with the City adopted General Plan. Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your reilev. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a fleli: Investigation No significant adverse impacts on the environment were found as a result of this p -oject The Planning Commission has recomranded the issuance of a tegutive Declaration ZZ RECOMMENDATION: The Planing Commission recommends that the City Council • adopt the attached Ordinance approving the issuance of a Negative Declaration and Zone Change No. 79 -08. Res o ctfully sdbmltted, JACK LAM, Director of Commtoity, Development JL:nm Attachments: Vicinity Map Initial Study Ree iution No. 79 -60 of the Planning Con dogion City Council Ordinance L CLAIM FOR DAMAGES TO PERSON OR PROPERTY mom rot Me INSTRUCTIONS 1 Claims for Aealh. Injury to Parsee or to peraooat mperty most be filed not Later than 100 days after the occurrence. (GOV. Code Sec. 9119) 2 Claims for damages to real property ^+ast be filed we later than 1 year after the acaraece. (Cov. Code Sec. 911-7) y. Read enure claim before filing. d. See age 2 forth must be alpted On page page g at bottom. serldent d. Attach sePsnte aheeta I nacelle r7. W give full details. SIGN EACH SHEEP 7. Claim must be filed wMl y CIerL (Gov. Cade Sec 9176) TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESERVE FOR FILING STAMP CLAIM No. CEE'i9�"Q MY OF RANCKO CUCAMONLA ADMINISTRATION SEP 24 1979 AM P j9j11j 11j1Zj1 j2j3!4iai 6 natural person) STEVE State to which you desire notices or Communications W be sent repMing this Calm: JAMES E HUMMEL 240 S PARCSLLS ST E or INJURY Cartier Hive rue parueut MY VEHICLE RAN INTO A CHAIN LINK FENCE ON MAYBERRY ST ACCIDENT AT 10 30 P M NO SIGNS OR ANY WARNINGS, ACCIDENT OCCURRED APPROXI 150 FEET SOUTH OF BANYON 4! h When did DAMAGE or INJURY occur? Give full particulars, date, time of day 7/25/79 10 30 P M Where did DAMAGE or INJURY Occur Describe fully', Chit locate on diagram on reverse side of this shat, whcra app'epria,e, give street names and address and mea:utemens from landmarks: PREVIOUSLY ANSWERED What partictilar ACT or ONIM10N do you claim Caused the Injury or damage? Give names of City employees causing the Injury or items,.. If known NO WARNING, NO SIGNS, LIGHTS, REFLECTORS, ACCIDENT OCCURRED ON MAJOR STREET AT NIGHT What DA.MA GE or INJURIES do you clal , resulted• Give PJI extent of injuries or damages clotn,ed: MULTIPLE, BACK, NECK•PROPERTY DAMAGE, AGGRAVATION OF PRIOR INJURIES What APIOL:,T Jo you claim on account of ea -h item of injury or da•raee as of date of presentation of this Cain, giving Wal oof com nsation UNKNOWN AT THIS TIRE Iv. ESTIMATED AXOCNT v far as knonn you claim on osourt of each Item of pro.pecnve injury it damage, giving basis of UNKNOWN AT TItIS TIME SEE FACE 2 (OL'CRt THIS CLAIM MUST De SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE Iff paYmcnss rewired, it any. and naraH of Ituuran- ComDaN ' (Amountl NONE TO DATE lDaie — Itaml ua mado on account of accident or INury DR TALBOTT, ONTARIO CALIFOR,`IIA DaelOO and HorDit� RAN CUCASIONGA, CALIF d address of Dldness cs, 6265 MAYBERRY, WITNESS. LOWELL SALSER. READ CAREFULLY r South. and West; indicate Dlace of n of streets. In<ludin[ North. Lis . $.• location aI yourself distances to street ,amt`s. For dl seeldent claims Place an following dlsprem A.1 and location of Yourself or your lent by X' and by shawln[ house numbers o ) If Clt9 Veldda was Im'olved. designate hick Itttcf lwstlo a' fiiw �h ct�a e�Xtlme at oeddeendtlb �slmao d —� our vehicle when You tint saw City yid the diagram al[ kla at the ttm ;ate; do nattfbYth� silundon, attach hereto • DmP•r FE: it diagram i�Ts FOR OTHER AGCIDE' SIDEWALK cup CUR PARKWAY SIDEWALK 7 / I L_j LFOR AUTOM061LE ACCIDENTS J F U Data 7 Typed Name. B g/18� 51 noWre eltalC ] mt t� person idiot o ,j be It etvt ^s I JAMES E. IIUMMEL relauonshiD / (.�q L7)�� r l {)�'+ S ^,�,-/ ATTY FOR AYES E RUMM L. —� Cal Pen• Code Sec, 771• MDTEr Presentation of a false claim 1a je RX �GOV ICDDE SFC 91541 CLAIMS MUST BE FILED WITH Y /��+a_ - 0 Ll 9 II C� t 0 F lu _._.J a EED a GtJ G� d i�g ia g GO o � Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAT,GA INITIAL STUDY • PART I - PROJECT INFORIIATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of tl:is application, the Environmental Analysis staff will preparo Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make ono of three determinations: 1) Tile proleet will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, wr 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning a the proposed project. PRO,;ECT TITLE: 97c<C tint= 0'IKE e"J APPLICAI.'C'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: i.14d L r ^t fES 3 NAME, ADDRESS, TELErnon OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED PQNCERNING THIS PROJECT: It 1C1 lam/ rx"W'l<il -a CA 52 ", LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. f %S:(.Sc ♦'S P;G ° <<t_ Zz9 <-, -/ ,,V ' �7�nn ✓ ♦ �, , y nk�C7s1 n- his r — F1iS- t.- ♦ .� LIST OTHER PEPNITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THr AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PE[iHITS: to `-2� 0 PROJCCT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT: A -/ rc al -z n_.- ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A17Y: S4 Aw2� DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENPAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLPDING INMIUINTION ON TOPOGPoIPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING. STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): 7F/E :,. rE IS '3a`aa -eA ii/:D .See rLaS TL> r./c 5ea,7a _.!},LAC- ,7 /. °t /nQaSlt'„!C a /St "S fr T2= /kI Aal7 S'r 71/ • In,)c %fNllc /S /5 76` 7740 .SLa74 !'2,t /'fY —O r/IE rtCS: ,5 a U,LJr 1❑ Is the nro7ect, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? ;- Q /5 IWA. Tars r,:1.7rCT: YES Nu - 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? Y_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? 3. Crcate a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! •c 4. create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? t 5: Remove any existing trees? Now, many? 6. Creates the need for use or disposal of potentially hai ardour materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: -X/c Ca.J.,JP- dEFCS Z Ar ..dA -Ce rt -, ,A 11 t 7V M -,; IL SC,we- 1 „JTC. Cu.., "c w•i4,..(t .a.,,4 T-TC CC ciGi_ /'tA IMPJRTAIrr: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in Lhe attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fact., statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the DevC•lornv, :t Review Committee. Date 1`i Signature Title T-3 • 11 0 I a E�hF'v�y l6mcro,cc;y>rs P.CSOLUTION N 79 -60 A RFSOLVTION OF TIK RANCHO CUCRIONGA PIANNINC C/NHI5SI09 RM"DIENTI[I.G AITROVAI. OF 7ONF (IMVE NO 79 -08 REQUESTIIC A CHANCE OF 70NE FpUI A -1 TO 11 -2 FOR TR 1A ACHES OF LAND WCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, 1.100' EAST OF I -15 - ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO 229- 021 -59 11IEREAS, on the 17th dat of August, 1979, an appl icatlon vas (fled and accepted on the above described project; and WERLAS, on the lath d , if t979, thr rlanntot Crsn l +sl in held a drla advertised Public hearing pursuant to S ^rtlon 6565+ •,f the Callbania Goverment Code SECTION 1�• The Rancho Cucao,oupa Planning Commisston has made the following findings: 1 Thnt th, suhjrat rroperty It, wultahle for the uses permitted to the prepesed cone in terms of nceess, size, and compatibility with existing land use In the surrot-lding area; 2 The prere r•' roar ehanpe could not have .ignlftcant Iml•a,t rvlronr,cnt nor tale surrounding rro- pctt;ry; .. 1 flat lhv rt,•Posed one chnuav is In conformance with the proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rh.r'a 0aw1n•nga rla•toing Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and has recommendod Issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 12, 1979 EON, THEREFORE. HE IT RESOIVED: I That pursuant to Section 65810 to 65811 of the California Gol•crncvnt Code. that the rla+rfng C,•emissloo of the CIt5 of Rancl,n Cucamonga herebv re, marridA approval an the 12th da, rf Svpt,r,Nv r, I979 of 7etu• lL m1,. No 79_08 2 the Planning Co.issfrn hureb• reco�retyls that the City Council npprrve and adopt Zone Change He 19 -08 1. That a Certified Cops of this Pes,lutfon and related matcri,i 6: ,v1•, a,L•p t.vl In Ili,. rla.ning Comwlsafon altnll be forvardrd to rise City Canuall ArritowD AND ADnPIFn 71115 11111 PAY OF SFPTEN R. 1979. z7 PLANNlfx; C0I0IISSION OF TIIE CITY OF RANCIR) (VCAHOt ;rA 0 By: �_�CS2t£t/{:.r C=ep • %'� II _rman limpet, C1 Lt n Seeretary of the Pla,u,lnR Cnmmisstan I JACK LM1Y Sccrctar) of the PlannlnR Cnrmlalfon a. , to -it, of Rancho Cu"w"F -a, w hercb, certtf, that the fnreRolnR Rosolutlon h,., duly and r, Eularl,• Introduced, passed, and adnptrd h) tile PlannlnR Cmmicelon of [iho Clq• of Rancho CucamnnRa at a rephlar meottn,. of tlm PlannlnR "emission held _ on the I-'t" day of Scptevber, 1979, h) the follovinR v,to to-wit: AYES: CRIHISSIONERS JONES, GARCIA, IOISTOY, RMPEL IDES: CO>CIISSIONIRS: NONE AIISEAT: MDIISSIONERS: NAM Us 0 OR,riNAN.:E NO. 88 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY nUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, R' .KING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 229- 021 -59 FROM A -1 TO N-2 FOR 38 56 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH S!OE OF AR1011, 1,300' EAST OF INTERSTATE 15 LOBS AS W THE CITY COUN"IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES ORDAIN SECTION 1 The City Council hereby finds and determines t eMoo lowinv• A That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamom , following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the property herein- after described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed b,, law as duly heard and considered said recom- mendation 8 That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga C This rezoning will have no significant environ- mental impact as provided to the Negative Declaration filed herein SECTION 2: The following described real praperty is hereby rezoned Tn the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly A -1 (Limited Agriculture) to H-2 (Heavy Industrial) Said property is located on the north side of Arrow Route, 1300' east of Interstate 15 known as Assessor's Parcel No. 22S- 021 -59. SECTION 3. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the URTUe—rk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, at least once in The Da j.4. Report, a newspaper of general circulation published Tn the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this _day of , lg19. AYES: NOES ABSENT ATTEST: yor City Clerk 2F 11 E M 0 R A It 0 U M DATE September V. 1979 TO City Manager and ttembers of the City Council FROM Assistant City Manager9g' SUBJECT Re nest. fo an ordinance establishing a Rancho Cucamonga A visor —v C— r issroa. " attached report and rough draft ordinance providing for the establishment ,n Advisory Commission was reviewed at the regular meeting of the Advisory Committee held September 20, 1979 The ordinance includes a statement on the general role of the commission, composition of membership, - terms of appointient, removal of members, meetings, officers and minute taking The proposed ordinance addresses a number of specific Advisory Committee concerns raised at its last meeting Meeting dates and attendance policios are not specifically mentioM since these items are normally established by resolution to a<Tdibl periodic changes • Although the original rough draft ordinance specified the creation of an Advisory Conittee rather than Cccission, the concerns of the Committee was that "Commission" denoted permanency Therefore, the proposed ordinance was modified to reflect this change and orovide for the creation of an Advisory Commission rather than committee This change in no way affects the original purpose of the advisory group In essence their responsibilities are to act in an advisory capac ty to the City Council and planning Commission whether they are ettablished as a commission or a ommittee. A motion was made by Dennis Stout, seconded by Mike Zinkin to recoimiend that the designation of "Advisory Committee" be changed to "Advisory Commission " Ayes (like Zinkin, Mary Barlow, Sharon Romero. Helen Blanchard, T Harrell Allen,Mary Lane, Uennis Stout Noes Joe White Abstain Glen Rankin, Faye Stamper, Chuck Buquet, Jim Itendez, ann Evan McCall A motion was then made and unanimously carried that the proposed ordinance be ref "rred to he City Council for their consideration RECO;VEIIDATI FR011 ADVISORY COt41ITTEE. That the proposed ordinance es�lrs nq ,.., v sort' omm ttee be modified to reflect "Advisory Commission" aes that the ordinance be referred to City Council for their consideration JHR:lk 3V 11 E M 0 R A N D U H DATE: September 13, 1979 TO Advisory Committee Members FROM Jim Robinson, Assistant City Manage ra� SUBJECT Rough Draft Ordinance /Advisory Committee 0 At the last Advisory Conittee meeting, it was requested that a draft ordinance be prepared that would address specific concerns of the Advisory Committee. This rough draft ordinance hopefully addresses all of the issues raised at tnat meeting The ordinance includes a statement on the general role of the committee, composition of membership, terms _ of appointment, removal of members, meetings, ofricers, and an option for minute taking However, the ordinance does not address the specifics for an attendance policy. General policies such as this, are generally established by resolution or minute action so changes can be made, if necessari, without amending an ordinance which is a more lengthy process. Specific meeting dates are also generally set by resolution • With regard to the role of Advisory Committees, this was purposely left 4nstructured to give the Advisory Committees latitude in studying a host of community issues In addition, the city Council and Planning Coamission would be in a position to refer items to the Advisory Committees that need input, feedback, study, etc., fr m a cross section of the City Consideration of this ordinance is included on the agenda for the September 20, Advisory Committee meeting, but please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions that may require some research before the meeting JHR lk cc: City Council Lauren Wasserman, City iianager 0 --5( ORDIIUUIEE 110. 87 All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCNIOIIGA, CALIFORNIA. CREATING AN ADVISORY COWSSION TO ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNIIIG CONiISSIOII The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does orddin as follows SECTION I There is hereby created and established in the city an AN'i50fy Commission Role of Advisory Commission SECTION 2 The Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission shall act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and Planning Commission on community issues and perfam such other adviso -y functions as may be delegated to the Advisory Commission from time to tfne by the Planning Commission or City Council _ { Advisory Commission Hembership SECTIOII 3. The Advisory Committee shall consist of a total of fifteen Zli msabers with five (5) appo)n from eajp of the forRRP�(3) communities . in Rancho Cucamonga, namely ga, and _EiSLmr�S Members C` of the Advisory Co.mission shall be residents of Rancho Cucamonga and shall to appointed by the City Council The Mayor shall submit to the Council the name of any person prenosed for appointment to the Advisory Co mission and upon such appointment by the Council, the ,lame of the appointee shall be recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting Teens of Appointment. SECTION 4 The fifteen (15) members of the Advisory Cona/ssion niitfaTTy appointed shall determine the length of their terms by lot. Thereafter all terms shall be for four (4) years Three (3) members from oa�h cf the three subcommittees (Alta Loma). (Cucamonga). and (ELlwdndd) sh 1 serve a term four fl) years and shall continue until their respective terms exi.,re eiiess sooner removed as provided in this Ordinance. Two %2 members froru ::r.. of the three (3) sebcommittees shall serve a tem of two (2) y.-a-s anu shall continue 1r office until their respective terns expire unless ,Ooner removed as provided to this ordinance. If a vacancy shall oc!ur, other than by expiration of the tern of office, it shall be filled by appointment by the layor with t,:^ approval of the Council for the umxpired tem. Remova' of Members ;ECT10 5. Any member of the Advisory Commission may be removed at + any time by a majority vote of the City Council In addition, the .3Z Advisory Commission may recommend to the City Council removal of any • member eof that Advisory COrrlishednby resoluviolated any meeting attendance may be Regular Meetings SECTion 6 The dates upon which and the hour and place at which any regu ar meeting shall be held shall be fixed by resolution or minute action of the City Council _ Officiers aEchaOi frperson to preside subcommittee regular meetingssonya monthly rotating basis Minutes SECTiou 8. The Secretary of the Commission shall cause the minutes of regular, adjourned regular, alto special meetings to be kept; and shall, as soon as possible titer each meeting, cause a copy of the minutes to be forwarded to each member of the Commission and to the City Clerk The City Clerk or designee will serve as secretary for the Advisory Commission SECTiOR 9 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk sFa attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause at same ine published within fifteen (15) days after its passage, The Da�i ly Report, a news DaDerand general i rculatedr tnl theoCitybofs Rancho Cucamonga, Ty of Ontario. Californ ia, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of_ . 1979 AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST _it ty� M iayor 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1979 TO: city Council d City Manager rna: Lloyd Hubbs, city Engineer SUBJECT: A PORTIONiiOF BARYORDERING F AH STREET - lRACT9444 The attached Resolution is the second phase of abandonment of a portion of Banyan Street from Amethyst to 300 feet easterly. The area to be abandoned is being replaced by relocation of Banyan through the tract development of Tract No 9444 (see attached sketch) The County Transportation Department has dealt with the developer. Mark III location. Duento therchangecf oomtCounty cos City andstheamoratoriumr.dthe project was delayed We have been requested by Mark III hares. Inc. to proceed with the steps necessary to bring the map to a point of recorda tion. hear coamentsooncthesproposed abandonmentlicThe ahearingswas tadvertisedh o and posted as required by law. REC0M14ENDATION: It is recommended that the city Council approve the attached Resolution ordering to be vacated a portion of Banyan Street Respectfully submitted. Lloyd 8. Hubbs��" City Engineer LBH:deb 0 34 I I LN I A I I! L MAUI U I !'.lu )444 ~ IN THE COUIIfY OF SAN BERMARD,NO <rtS.3 •1 •1 STATE OF C..LIFORNIA '1 • 1 i)tYI /JN•R.Ph //f/I1//Il Gt)!I•tYN.ti. / /�.MJ ✓L.1N1�.IWt ..tl •�..I /V pvtY ' lw. N.nn Mtw.w.4 rr•� ��� rit �i\.S • iiNW f�ltwrt t/ MiR1../I+ / L/IN... • J r r•11/f•R.l t• // I ) ♦.f t� .y J.� ll/ /III`hV•• AYII {( ,n•W 1J LI 11 R lYIW Iv i I u1 /I / IIYI r/Yt.,•r•,a V t.ttfl/ �Q «a/ii •nu• • F� ylfl .t l' - Ty^ •1 '1 • 1 pvtY ZQ3 4b /. W/4,10 v . MCI Ao 1 TRACT 9444 U' u� N 2` 0 V AN JT t � PORTION TO -i s/ so BE ABANDONED ' s G r e Jo " i a FOc / . 7 48 I'7/T,. . E a 9L 18977 /0 9 M G // /O Tc �� —a - - -- L/ 52' IL i IJ /Q I /S �% / /y, I.t I /'d /s 0 RESOLUTION NO 79 -77 El A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE VACATED, A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET AS SHOWN ON A NAP (NO V -003) ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA WHEREAS, by Resolution No 79 -75, passed of September 19, 1979, the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga declared its intention to vacate a protion of a City street hereinafter more particularly described, and set the hour of 7:00 p.n on October 3, 1979, in the Council Chambers of said City, as the tine and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacation; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held at said time and Plata, and there were no protests, oral or written, to such vacation; BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows SECTION 1 The Council hereby finds from all the evidence subnitted tt wrtion or Banyan Street is unnecessary for present or rrospective public street purposes and the City Council hereby makes its irder vacating that portion of said City street as shown on Nap 'to ! -003 on file in the office of the Clerk of the City of Rancho Cuca -nnga, which has been further described in a legal description which Is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A ", and by reference made a part hereo* SECTION 2 The subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations a exceptions, if any, set forth in Exhibit "B ", which is attached hereto and by reference made a part nereof SECTION 3 The Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution toFee recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San nernardino County, California. ATTEST PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED 'his—day of 1979 AYES NOES ABiENT City er �177 liaydr Resolution No 79 -77 Page 2 EXHIBIT "1." LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET That certain portion of the northeast 114 of Section 27, Township 1 north, Ranoe 7 west, San Bernardino Meridian, Records of Government Surveys in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows PARCEL I That portion of Banyan Street (25.00 feet wide) as shown dedicated on the map of Tract 2051, recorded in Book 22, of Maps, Page 36, Records of said County PARCEL 2 lJ EXCEPT114G THEREFORE that portion lying easterly of the following is described line Beginning at a point on the south line of said Banyan Street said point being north 890 44' DO" east, a distance of 567 80 feet from the east line of Amethyst Street (66 00 feet wide), thence north 00 28' 32" west to the Point of Terminus That portion of Banyan Street being a strip of land 9.00 feet in width as conveyed to said County be deed recorded September 22, 1950, in Book 2643, Page 412, Official Records of said County 0 • Resolution No 79 -77 Page 3 EXHIBIT "B" RESERVATIOIIS, AND /OR EXCEPTIONS FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF BANYAN STREET RESERVING AND EXCEPTING unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga ingress and egress rights across the existing rights -of -way until the new alignment is constructed or as provided by the City Engineer also unto the Cucamonga County Water District an easement for the right, at any time to construct, maintain, operate, replare, remove and renew water lines and related appurtenances also unto the Southern California Edison Company and the General Telephone Company a 10 foot easement for the right, at any tine to construct, maintain, operate, replace, renew and enlarge lines of pipe, conduits, cables, wires, poles and related appurtenances for the operation and /or transmission of telegraph, telephone or electric energy 0 0 It EH0RAit 0U 11 • DATE: September 27, 1979 TO City Manager and Members of the City Council FROM Janes Robinson, Assistant City tanagergy SUBJECT ReRe ues�Advisory Committee for repeal of Ord nice No. B provid lno for the sale of safe and sane fir_works. At its meetino of September 20, the Advisory Committee reviewed the existing city ordinance providing for the sale of safe and sane fireworks in the City of Rancho Cucamonga The request to review the ordnance cane from several members of the tdvisory Committee who fel• d need to -eview the City's policy regardi,g the sale of safe and sane fireworks in light of problems encountered this past 4th of July Staff reviewed the ordinance with the Committee and explained all rules, regulations, and restrictions associated with the sale of safe and sane fireworks Staff also explained the selection policy established by Council last year allowing the sale of safe and sane fireworks by o j charitable non - orofit groups with at least 51' of their membership beino comprised of residents of the City whose prinary enohasis is serving the youth of Rancho Cucamonga Chief Bob Lee of the Foothill Fire District presented an overview of the problems confronted by the Foothill Fire District between June 28 and Juli 4, the period of time in which fireworks were sold Chief Lee explained that during this period of time there were 32 fireworks related incidents Specifically on July 4, Bob Lee reported there were 14 fires which required mutual aid from Upland and Ontario Although the fire loss was minimal, Chief Lee stated the potential damage would have been extremely high if normal July weather conditions had existed In response to a question by Committee Member, Ilike Zlnkin, Lee stated that fire related problems were experienced from both safe and sane fireworks After considerable discussion during the Advisory Coi,nittee meeting, Evan McCall moved, T Harrell Allen seconded and was unanimously carried to recommend that the City Council consider the repeal of the use of all fireworks in Rancho Cucamonga and that the City investigate alternative methods for sponsoring fireworks shows for the public in Rancno Cucamonga Staff has notified all members of the Advisory Committees and service organf,ations that this item will be on this Council agenda Therefore, members of the Advisory Committee should be in a Ltndance to clarify their concerns or answer any questions that the Louncil may have Recommendation From Advisory Committee That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonqa consider the ® repeal of the use of all fireworks in Ranchi Cucamonqa and that the City investigate alternative methods for sponsoring fireworks shows for the public in Rancho Cucamonga JHR lk 4[ • M E M O R A N 0 M DATE: April 2, 1979 TO* City Manager and Members of the City Council , FROM: Jim Robinson, Assistant to the City ManWrOv- SUBJECT Fireworks Stands /Random Drawing This Thursday a drawinq was held to determine the five charitable groups to receive permits for fireworks stands for this year. Prior to the drawing, the City received a roster of membership to verify the 51% residency requirement and proof of a non - profit corporation fron each that of the qroups Jobs permit that did not meet the 51'. y 51'. residencyre4uirement requested a The following qroups drew the first five permits: 1 Citrus Little League • 2 Cucamonga Pens Scrvice Club J Kiwanis Club 4. vineyard Little League 5 Boy Scout Troop 641 The Rotary Club, Sons of Italy, and Miss Softball America drew numbers 6,7, and 8 resp ^ctively These three groups will receive the first three permits for 1980 All croups will e required to obtain a business license, a permit from bthe Fire District, and each booth will be inspected by the City Building and Safety Division J11R:Ik cc: Jerry Grant • • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MD/ORANDUI Date: October 3, 1979 To: City Manager and City Council From: Jack I.=, Director of Community Development Subject! Approval iscal Impact oModel tfor tthe rCity Of i t Rancho Cucemungato Attached 1s the revised page to the MKCK contract The change has bean made pursuant to Councils' request at the last netting. RECO?CfENDAilON: That the Council direct the Mayor to r.ign the Agreement and forward to MKCK for their signature. Respectfully ubmitted, JACK LAN, Director of Community Development JL:BKM :nm Ej 4,5 0 RM THE ZR UE 0 ..W JAWWe 70: city Council Please refer to the September 19 agenda for the complete contract. There were approxi- mately 50 Pages. therefore. we did not feel we should rerun such a large document again The first Page is the only one with changes. if you are missing the contract. Please • contact me for a COPY Bev. 0 AGI t I III.N I I-01' , r •, `* . 1, • rillS AGRCEIIEIIT, made and vI lvrrd trlb+ lh,s day vt. 1979, by and between the CITY Or MIT V:110 i l4A xl•n,A, a municipal corporation, hero,nafter refers••d to a•. "Ci:y" and IMCK Incorporated, a CAM 01111.1 Corporation, hcl,•rniCler lolorted '-o as "CO, :ultant I a I:1 , I r %I.!. 'file City is desirous of obtainln•1 III' Of till C'unsullanG jto perform servicos consisting oC (1) an anal }sis •,f the Ci�ral 1 impact of alternative General ^lans an,l program4, and (2) the prepiration of a computer -based fit:oal Impicr m ^del for evalual this q• tl'c flsral 1111P.10 oC 11t-11-11.rLIN-, Cul:,r, drt: luP arms, General , Plan allcrnaGrves, cis} do••c iopm••nt ,alp s of .north and cost n1,1 I'venuc altcrnatt•o,. The CLLy nl 1110 (Imsultan L, there Core, agree as follows: II SCOP1 Of SLRVI:I Ih•• tonsultanl shell p,ovldo tho svr •• - sue• I;•IIh In Allarhmenl A .Inch t, at•a111c,l hc,el , and by sill:. 1, f •r nCe i, made pars Ii. Ienf in mldtl unl, Ih, t'en•.nl lain •.h 111 wont w, h the (lily':: staff (including City Council and Planning COmmi9SiOn ) in conjunc. tion with its analys!s and the formulation of the fitcal model so ® as to maximize local input The role of the �Je E MEMO RA 11 D U9M eptem er TO: city council - City Manager FROM: Harry Empe SUBJECT Telephone System Update It has become apparent that the telephone system. as the City is process is enc- ing now. is out moded. When adding new lines, or stations 1�Above all, the akin to a patch job using balling wire and chewing 9 process is becoming to costly for the service returned To inprove the system and also provide a system 60 that easily . This should the opportunity arise. �ulds cost and,wou $2,320;d provide to install. This would reduce our need to many costly key lines and BO internal stations ide trunk lines and 40 internal As the system now stands the City has ten outs stations the 40 internaeen designated and in some I stations have all b in fact i is $25.00 /mo for cases sta ens are being each line on a keyset. b g shared. Which means the use of keysets, a very costly item. item under the City Hall function o1 It is recommended that the budget hone system An additional roved from the the alarm Sys sen�be redesignated 5454 date the phone be approved and item for the hreiff's Deovide addition of stations to conference system, contingency account to D install new twenty station instrument with conference System- MJE cak INTER - OFFICE MEMO 0 DATE September 26, 1979,,,`'"",,,,, FROM Thomas wickum, Captain PHONE 989 -6611 S Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station TO Harry Empy, Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT Telephone Service and Budget Item for Council Meeting October 3, 1979. Regarding our conversation on September 26, 1979, I have contacted thr telephone company consultant, Mr. Steven Judy, and requested a written estimate on our telephone system changes. He informs me that it would be impossible to get it to you by September 27, 1979, and, therefore, I have assembled the information verbally from him, which will be on the written estimate included in this memo. I. Addition of station cc existing conference system. Installation - $ 45.00 Added monthly cost - $ 8.50 9 x $8.50 - $76.50 2. Replace four (4) six - station instruments with ten - station. instruments. Install a new twenty - station instrument with conference system. Installation - $120.00 Added cost per month - $ 23.65 9 x $24.65 - $212.85 Estimated total installation and yearly cost $454.35 Mr. Judy will rush through his written estimate and I will forward it to your office cs soon as it is received. Tit: RU: a RF . t,)1 47 11 I I LJ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1979 TO: City Council d City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL WIDENING AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON BASE LINE BETWEEN BERYL AND LION STREETS As a part of the City's Federal Aid Urban Construction Program, Base Lire is to oe widened and resurfaced between vineyard Avenue and Hellman Avenue and between Archibald Avenue and west of Turner Avenue. The design of this project has just been cor ileted and it will be under construction In early 1980. This project will complete basic 4 -lane traffic service along Base Lint, but to avoid excessive delay, no new right of way was purchased. With no new right of way available, there will rematr. a gap in what would ce a continuous sidewalk between the Library and the high school Students walking to school will be fcrced onto the street near traffic or onto private property. In order to properly provide for pedestrian movement, the City would be required to obtain right of way dedication and to construct ultimate improvements in this area Improvement would include curb, gutters, sidewalk, paving, landscaping and fence reconstruction The estimated cost of these improvements 1s $40,000. Due to Federal constraints on right of way acquisi- tion, it would be recommended that the widening and right of way acquisition be completed as a separate project to be constructed immediately following the FAU resurfacing portion This project was approved for recommendation to the Council by the Planning Commission at its September 12, 1979 meeting. The Engineering Division feels that the most efficient and cost effective procedure for the design of this project would be to have it done by the design consultant on the Base Line widening and resurfacing project, Associated Engineers This consultant already has much of the field and design data available. Associated has prepared a design agreement based on hourly costs, the total not to exceed $4,900. It is reconrnerded that the Council approve the additional widening and the execution of the design agreement with Associated Engineers Respectfully submitted, Lloyd B Hubbs / /C City Engineer LBH:deb ) �C// L[ _U t� LD L) aW I z w CD Q, Ln YYM•-iM= I i i; W o W In \. W O i•In, l� N WII¢_ W N � I h a JI I _ I I .011 J V- -YGN 1 ob MIS -_ —� L--- vro.oY I s A rl I I I , 0 °' ,ale- PC3 I� I ale 0- ,r Q k 1 I I !I ti - ,I K O N 6 ¢ ( r I • (:1 w N _N 4 N Y M Y • I I •� ' Y Y m M M �f-I J W W W d W W W W I a g g. Z� —yill I I c c I ti - ,I K O N 6 ¢ ( r I • (:1 w N _N 4 N Y M Y • I I •� ' Y Y m M M �f-I J W W W d W W W W v {, AGREEMENT f WiP{• INFERING SERVICES TIN, t v cement Is made and entered nd., lh s —, day 0 _._ g, T V I +I RANCHO CUCAMONGA n Wnlcipal Co, I• +earn,, he,eln- •... -wI t•�\ +a1MILLSANDLILL A�, -JI A FOFI•IGIN(ERS IN 1 . •11 IWO, • •• t ast T, "It oet D1llarin, I all[ ,rn J. o1764 hrrClo- n• a .a, ENO NfF I \I Vl SSt 1.. IH k'�F \`- l ( � � nas nectl for Y'vtF nv.. Ong servc••s, cmyn, mg of lh .nynt Dlana % tsUmatesa 1 other protesslonal SEt'M 1140 1 1VlLl NING \'ND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS •� Sol I l ti I +: tvf `Arl N DERYL SIREL T ANO L'INN STREE T , herein A• q •> ` n +. led the c N( • Nt ER to provide rlgutred enginerr •ng It V1 a4 ,h• ! I..I NEE has +plc In llr $knowledge, trulning and ,e e,.ener .. J.s . a. onsl•ucl ,.., \ N A ', I, \4 the ENGINEER Indicates w nmgness lop orm englnelnng ..rva CS for the I T V,Yder cant, a 1, NOW, TIry REF UKE , tike C I T and the ENGINEER, for the convdrrnllons hereinafter named agree as follows A141 I LI E 1 The t NGINE ER agrees to furnish and perform the various pt afessional s, n aes. pertinent to pnepm atioo of said Mans and Sprelf.cat,ons and Cost E sl6tlates n follows A 1 vyu n I -h Im.111 .rccnw.ry fi,•Id surv. vs In esl+blish Iurbprnlrls Irad <, sltlewnle Imp- ovrmenls and dl rvow4v rrconslruclmn within the prnjr t limits 0410 2 Prepare grant deeds for C I TY execution, for drdtcat ton of right -of- way to master plan width for two parcels upon receipt of neces -ary title reports to be supplied by C I TV 3 Prepare plans, contract doruments, specuticatinns and quantity estimates a Submit design plans to CITY for plan check and review S Make necessary plan and specification revisions to meet CITY approval 6 Upon receipt of bids. ENGINEER shall analyze bids and make recommendation on award of contract 0 Constructon At the option of the CITY the ENGINEER shall provide all required construction slaking when aulhorized by the City Engineer 11 2 ENGINE ER shall b, ava,table for consultation during construction on any need -d plan revisions 3. Make recommcndatitm on contract charge orders C Reproduction Original tracings shall become properly of the CITY upon romplel ion of this contract Costs for reproduction of plans and -arcdiwt,ons wl II be borne by the CI T at the direct costs of reoroduct tan, AItT ICLC II - The CI TY agrees to pay the ENGINFER, as cnmpensatifm for the ab,ve n.,med orofess.nnal set vu es- A For all qrm• listed in Sret,on A of Artit to I, Pie f I TN will cnmpt nsate the FNGINFI- R At the hourly mantes nttacht,d as F d cut A" The •nlal of these hourly chtr qes shall not exceed $a, 900 Ott Prosnled the wntk is com- pleted by July 11, 1980 • 2 / J / • U For all items listed In Sectiun B of Article I, the Cl ry w II compensate the ENGINEER4 at hourly rates In accordance w lh aa.. -xn•blt "A' pro- vided the CITY elects to authorize such work C For Section C. of Article I and for any other prints or doetmnents the Cl TY will compensate the ENGINEER for direct cost per Section C of Article I D The ENGINEER will submit with his boiling, a monthly summary of the hours worked by each classification, the hourly rite, and the total charges for etch classification ARTICLE III If 'he work is suspended indefinitely or abandoned prior to completion of the Engmeermg Services set forth in this agreenent, the C I TY agrees to Day the ENGINEER , al the rates set forth in Article It above, to the time of said su,opension or abandonment, which payment is to be the full and final settlement for all the work performed by the ENGINEER to said time, and such work shall become the property of the C I TY upon said payment ART ICLE IV - All trrms, cerdlpeo, and provisions hereof shall ,nu. a to and shall bind the parties herein, their successors and assigns IN lYl TNESS WHERLOF, the parties hereto have exe Aed this agreement the day and year first above written C I TY OF RANCHO CUC AMONGA a Mayor By- City Clerk MiLLl ANDU11,ASSOC IAIA It D NCLItS INt. Uy ^I-PROVED An l u f' ith President 0 City Attorney Rancho LucAmnngn 62, Associated Engineers CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS 718 EAST 'E STREET • ONTARIO CALIFORNIA 91104 • 1714) 980 5818 HOURLY RA I Lb (Effective 8 /1ii9) Principal Reglsterrd Civil Engineer $52 OC per Ivwr hmlor Rerystered Civil F ngmecr $41 00 p,•r lion. PI inclpal Licensed Lon 1 Surveyor 141 Of) pet hour r,ssocwte C -,,I Fnginerr $• FI 00 nrr hour r ssne sale Land F 'inner $ 111 00 per I,00, Ilmslrred Civil Englnerr $35 Of) per Mm, Srn,nr Desl,7.rr /UrafjS an $ 17 (N) per Ilrur Desognrr /Draftsman $2g.0t) per hour UrniLS,nan $27 00 per Maur Vat Ilyp all $LA (y) per limn Key I`unch Operator $I7 00 per hour ecrelarfal $17 01)1.• r Iggn 1-Man Survey P.lrty $1112,011 pre Iv'm )_Plan Survey warty $111 (10prr houl I_r.l.ln Survey Pirly with Electronic Distmxr M, aon. ,nit Ego,pmcm $110.01) per Ivso ?_Mao Svr vey Pi, IV w'th Electron., Dostaoc,, Mr4surm0 E4uopmwlt , II fxl per Ivyu lhell' hole ly rl1e5 rlo o,,I ijXILale Io oiling cools who h d, a to Ir,l ,Y <nH •n L , e paid to Ooverm,ental n,Irneirs or others 14l Au111s' o, 194U the I .led Ivv, ^ly rates •.omit o. r, nor 10% All .nn n p "' •, mad •ll hourly rAles or or fnllowmg Au,71st 1, 1980 shall br It the sL,led r Ile• muit'ohed by ' 10 t.xnlulT ••r PLANNING OFSIGNIN� SURVEYING • • 0 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • MEMORANDUM DATE: October 3, 1979 TO: City Council d City Manager FRO*:: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF THE REPLACEMENT, BETTERMENT AND COMMON USE AGREEMENT FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION IN CONNECTION WITH THE CUCAMONGA AND DEMENS CREEK IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Construction of the bridges required for the Demens Creek crossings of Sapphire. Carnelian and Beryl Streets will begin shortly and continue through next spring. The Red Hill Country Club Drive crossing over the Cucamonga Creek will be built n 1980 Any increase in the width of the bridges or approach roadways beyond that which now exists is a betterment and is funded by the City. These better- ments were agreed to by the City Council in larch, 1978. At that tlFe, the cost of the betterments was estimated at $73,000. The final cost is now $82,613 This amount is available in the City's 1979 -80 Gas Tax budget for this work Other parts of the agreement cover the mutual use of the rights -of -way for the roads and channel, maintenance responsibilities, etc It is recommended that the City Council approve the execution or the attached agreement and authorize the expenditure of $82,613 as detailed In the agreement. Respectfully submitted, Lloyd B Hubbs / /\ City Engineer LBH deb 2 50:� 5" Torataaal'rca 66"o FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT � &a Caunty of San Bstnardinol 925 Ent Thhd Svna San Be""ItO D. CA 9241 • (71413731665 PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY sale r C. J. OI NETRO. Fhad C VN EWw C1D- °. [ONaDO[W[Ilvl[OIs `/ JNN,L YN1yla CRe.�a. /n September 12, 1071 R .,,0 Te .ro /.I.n a.a Na+Nta /.TV Om.y, File: 1 -35312 09 A06AN'STRATIVI OFFICIR ROIN" AWINISTRATOR Jar u s.-va City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Llo•d hubbs City Engineer Be: Zone 1, Cucamonga Creek, Phase VI C/E Improvement Project Agreement No. A790/08008 Gentlemen: Forwarded herevith f(,r your approval and execurlom are six (6) Copies of the Replacement, Betterment and Common Uae Agreement No A790/08008 for the Red Hill Country Club Drive, Sapphire at banyan Street, Carnelian at Wilson Ave , and Beryl at Hillside Road in the above referenced project The total estimated City coat of betterment is $82.613 and is to be deposited into the Flood Control District funds as follows: a) $52.108 by October 1. 1979, and b) $30,505, the balance of the Batista red betterment by Jan. 1. 1980. Upon completion, please return the six (6) executed copies to this office for further handling and approval by the San Bernardino County Flood Control Dist- rict Board of Supervi Tors A completely executed copy vill be sent to your office for your recorls If you have any questions, please contact Hr, Mina S. Ghaly• Chief, Federal Projects Division, at (713) 383 -2278 Very truly yours, 13 a A" B Y 9 D C. J DI PIETRO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA Flood Control Engineer COdMUNITY DEVEIOPMENT DEPT SEP 151979 LM PN By ay W He Donald 7181919I111112111i13191516 Asat. Flood Control Engineer Ri.t:IJF:A Construction - Operations a� F.ne rAgY+TapN M owawam. aWN.r FaeNY F,s{aab B E T T E R N E N T A N D • C O M M O N U S E A G R E E M E N T Cucamonga Creek, Phase VI L Bridge Crossings At Red Hill Country Club Drive, Sapohire P Banyan Street, Carnelian and Wilson Avenue and Beryl at Hillside Road Bridges THIS ACREI1on. made and entered into this day of 1979, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY ", and SAN BERNARDINO CODY3Y FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, a body corporated and politic of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as 'DISTRICT". W I T R E S S E T H WHEREAS, CITY is owner of or exercises cognizance wet certain rights of way and easements for street and highway Turposes for certain pubue roads, hereinafter referred to as "ROADWAYS "; and WHEREAS, thn flood water of the Cucamonga Creek and /or Damages Creek Channel hereinafter referred to as "CREEK", pose a serious threat to health, life, and private and public properties including said ROADWAYS; ant t'HEREAS, the United States of America by :rd through :he United States Al�y Curps of Engineers, hereinafter referred to as "CORPS propose: to construct a flood control facility and +opur r onces thereto, hereinafter referred to as "CHANNEL", in secordan -r n th plans entitled Cucamonga Creek 0 and Demand Creek Channel, hereinafter referred to as "CIANtrEL PMIS', for A790/08008 Page 1 of 8 the purpose of aiding in the confinement of wat4ra of CREEK through CITY; and 40 WHEREAS, DISTRICT Is ovne. of or is acquiring lands for the construction of CHANNEL; nod WHERFAS, DISTRICT Is local interest representative for coordinating construction of CITY'S facilities within CHANNEL, and obtaining rights of way for CHANNEL; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT desires to conditionally occupy portions of ROADWAYS with co atructed CHANNEL; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to conditionally occupy portiere of DISTRICT lands with ROADWAYS facilities and public utilities; and WHEREAS, neither CITY nor DISTRICT entertains objection to the occupation of these portions of their lands or rights of way to be used by the other, which lands and rights of way are hereinafter referred to as "AREAS OF COPMON USE ", and are outlined in cross hatching on attached sheets marked EXHIBIT "Al through AS" and are made a part hnreof; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to replace CITY'S facilities utich removal is made necessary by reason of the construction of CHANNEL with replacement facilities of equivalent function, as determined by the State of California Departmunt of Water Resources, hereinafter referred to as REPIACMENTS; and WHEREAS, CITY desires to have DISTRICT Improve several of the existing CITY facilities, which Imptovment of existing faellitlos shall hereinafter be referred to as BETTERMENTS; and WHEREAS, said REPLACES RS and BETTERMENTS are Itemized and the con- struction costs are presently estimated on attached sheets marked EXHIBIT "B ", and mwee a part hereof; and WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to incorporate REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS Into construction; and 8008 Page 2 Page 2 of 8 0 LAEREAS, CITY and DISTRICT will mutually benefit by setting forth herein the rights and responsibilities of each with the AREAS OF CQDION USE and with regard to c..:.,truction and costs of REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS NOW, TNCREFORS IT IS MC'UALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: CITY SHALL: SECTION 1 1 1 Acknowledge the right of DISTRICT, Its successors, pemittees, or assigns, to construct, reconstruct, operate, and maintain CHANNEL. for flood control and water conservation purposes and for purposes of access under, Over, along, and across AREAS OF COMMON USE without need for any further per - mic or permission from CITY; provided, however, that any such use by DISTRICT . and /or others specified herein, shall not endanger Interfere, or conflict with the use of ROADWAYS by CITY or the •raveling public without first obtaining approval as set forth hereinafter. 1 2 Approve BRIDGE PLANS and plans as set forth in SECTION 2, Paragraph 2 3 of this Agreement. 1.3 Submit to DISTRICT, at least 30 days in advance, plans for any proposed construction, reconstruction, or maintenance within AREAS OF COYNON USE which may occupy, endanger, conflict, or interfere with CDAhNEL. or its functional operation, and obtain written approval from the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT of such plans which approval shall not be withheld, proviGed that the work contemplated does not or will not, in the opinion Of the Flood Control Engineer of DISTRICT, unreasonably conflict with, interfere with, or endanger CHANNEL or its functloml operation. /may 8008 Page 3 Page 3 of 8 1.4 Indemnify the United States of America and the DISTRICT, their officers, agents, anJ employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out o[, in connection with, or resulting from, act& or omissions on the part of CITY, Its officers, agents, contractors, and employees In its operation and maintenance of ROADWAYS, and /or In the performance by CITY of any work within or adjoining AREAS OF CO}OWN USE 1,5 Accept full responsibility and cost for any and all reconstruction, maintenance, or operation of the REPIACLNENTS and BETTERMENTS subsequent to transfer thereof to CITY, including that portion of street bridges lying above the plane of the soffit of the dock structure, and including roadway approaches, parapets, walkways, and railing Transfer of REPLACEMENTS and BETTEP.`IENrS to CITY by DISTRICT for operation, maintenance, and responsibility shall be effec- tive as wf the date of final inspection and acceptance by authorized represen- • tatives of CITY and DISTRICT or within ten (10) calendar days of f1n,.1 inspection Of CHANNEL by CORPS and DISTRICT whichever 1s sooner 1.6 Upon billing by the DISTRICT, furnish and deposit funds with DISTRICT equal to the estimated eost t�e proposed BETTERMENTS as follows, a) $52,108 by 9, and b) $30,505, the balance of the estimated BETTERMENT by January 1, 1980. The cost of BETTERMENTS shall include the design cost, office overhead, construe - tion costa, construction engineering, and other costs directly attributable to this work incurred by DISTRICT Total estimated cost to the CITY is eighty -two thousand, Fix- hundred and thirteen dollars (582,613) as per attached cost break- down. Exhibit "8" A790/08008 Page 4 of 8 1 / 1.7 Promptly pay to DISTRICT actual costs in excess of estimated coat of BETTERME \TS as determined by audit in Section 3, Paragraph 3.2 of t1•1s Agreement SECTION 2 DISTRICT SHALL: 2.1 Acknowledge the right of CITY, its successors or assigns, to use AREAS OF CML`I0N USE in croon with the public; to reconstruc -, operate, and maintain public utilities, REPIACI?MNTS and BETTEIUU NIS; provided, however, that any such use by CITY does not or will not occupy, endanger, interfere, or conflict with CRANNEL or its functional operation without first obtaining approval as set forth heralnbefore. 2 2 Prep -re BRIDGE PLANS, and plans as set forth is SECTION 1, Paragraph 1 3 of this Agreement. 2 3 Submit to CITY, BRIDGE PLANS for CPANNEL, REPLACLIOU 5 and BETTER- MENTS at least thirty (30) days in advance, and plans for any proposed con- struction, reconstruction or maintenance within AREAS OF COM40N USE which may interfere or conflict with public "a of RO�DMAYS or endanger the Safety of the traveling public, and obtain writtnn approval from the City Enaincer of CITY of such BRIDGE PLANS or othe pl.ns, which approval shall not be with- held, provided that the works enatemplated do not or will nnt, in the opinion of the City Engineer of CITY, unreasonably conflict or interfere with the public use of ROADWAYS or endanger the safety of the traveling public. 2.4 Inaemnify CITY, its officers, agents and employees against and hold t them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising out of, in connection with, or resulting from acts or emissions on the 66 A790 /08008 Page 5 Of 8 part of DISTRICT, its officers, agents, and employees against and hold them free and harmless of and from all claims and liabilities of any kind arising nut of, in connection with, or resulting from acts or omissions on the part of DISTRICT, its officers, agents, contractors, and employees In the construe - tion, reconstruction, or maintenance of CHANNEL with AREAS OF COMON USE, and or in the performance of any work within AREAS OF COMMON USE. 2 5 Coordinate construction of CHANNEL with CORPS. 2.6A ir'nister contract for construction of Sapphire at Banyan, and Beryl at Hillside bridges. 2.6B Coordinate construction with CORPS of REPLACEMENTS and BETTERMENTS of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Carnelian at Wilson Street bridges herein described and transfer to the CORPS costs of BETTERMENTS paid herein by CITY to DISIRICT for that crossing. 2 7 Notify CITY ten (10) days in advance of final inspection of work encompassed by this Agreement. 2 8 Promptly ref -md to CITY all funds 1u excess of actual cost of BETTER- MENTS as determined by audit in SECTION 3, Paragraph 3 2 of this Agreement. IT IS FURTHER UNDFRSTOOD AND MUTUALLY AGREED: SECTION 3 3 1 Except as expressly set forth herein, this Agreement shall not terminate CITY'S or DISTRICT'S rights within AREAS OF COMMON USE Both CITY C, i and DISTRICT shall use AREAS OF COM40N USE in such manner is not to interfere nreasonably with the rights of the other Nothing herein contained shall be • A790/08008 � ' Page 6 Of 8 • • El IN WITNESS WHEREOF, tl,e parties hereto have caused their respective ranee to be hereunto subscrined and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed by their respective proper officers thereunto duly authorized. APPROVED AS TO FOM Alan K Narks County Counsel County of San Bernardino ATTEST: By Secretary, Board of Supervisors San Bernardino County Flood Control District APPROVED AS TO FOR.N By City Clerk SAN BERIMOMINO COUNTY FWOO CONTROL DISTRICT By Chairmen, Beard of Supervisors San Bernardino County Flood Control District CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA By Mayor City AtttTney A190 /08008 Yalta 8 Oi 8 CUCAMONGA CREEK, PHASE VI UNITED STATES An 1Y CORPS OF ENGINEERS 111PROVE4ENT PROJECT COST ESTIAATE FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Red Hill Country Club Drive Roadway Betterment 1 Bridge StrucCLre Betternact width 6.25' or 15 71 X $120,000• 2 Clearing and Grubbing L.S 3. A C Dike (8') 41 L.P. @ $2.00 /L P. 4 Curb and Cutter (811) 136 L.F. @ $10.00 /L.P 5 A.0 Pavement 21.2 tone @ $25 CO /Ton 6 Class 71 A dace 42 4 tons @ $15.0,'Ton 7. Earthwork 230 C.Y. @ $6 00 /C Y TOTAL Sapphire @ Banyan Street Roadway Bettetncat I. Clearing and Grubbing L.S 2. A C. Pavement 160 tons @ $25 00 /Tou 3. Curb and Gutter (8 ") 90 L.P. @ $10 00 /L.F. 4. Uncl Excavation 80 C.Y. @ $3.00 /C.Y. 5 Uncl. Fill 8 C.Y @ $4 00 /C.Y. 6 Traffic Control L.S. eEstimnted coat of the Bridge Tr--,L $15,840 200 82 1,360 530 636 1.380 $23,023 $ 3,240 4,000 i'10 240 32 190 $ 8,602 EXHIBIT "B" ^3 Page 1 of 3 Y 0 i 40 El • Ll Carnelian @ Nilson Ave , Roadway Betterment 1. Clcarinq ano Grubbing L.S $ 3,780 2. A.C. Pavement 182 Tons @ $25 00 /Ton 4,550 3. Concrete Curb 6 Cutter 6 Sidewalk f C.Y. @ $1501C.Y. 900 4. A.C. Dike 25 L P @ $5.00 1L.F 125 5 Catch Basins (2) @ $3,000 /Each 6,000 6 4' Chain Link Fence 35 L.P. @ $10.00 /L.f. 350 7. Uncl. Excavation 67 C.Y $3.00 /C.Y. 201 8. Uncl Pill 24 C.Y. @ $4.00 /C.Y 96 9 Traffic Control L.S 445 TOTAL $16,147 Hillside @ Beryl Ave., Roadway Bettement 1. Clearing and Grubbing L.S. $ 3,990 2. A.C. Pavement 167 Tons @ $25 00 /Ton 4,175 3. Curb and Cutter 60 L.P. @ $10.00 / +.F. 600 4. A C. Dike 144 L.P. @ $5.00II..F. 720 5. Catch Basins (., C $3,300,'E�ch 6.000 6. Uncl. Excavation '93 C Y. @'$3.00 /C.Y. 579 7 Uncl. Fill 10 C.Y. @ $4.00 /C.Y 40 8 Traffic Control L.S. 505 TOTAL $16,609 EXHIBIT "B" Page 2 of 3 Su"ARY City of Rancho Cucs -ongr Cat Estimate for Bettereent 1 Bridges to be constructed by Corps of Engineers Contractor A. Red 8111 Country Club Drive $23,028 B. Carnelian @ Nilson :6.447 Sub -Total $39,475 IOZ Contingency 3.948 Sub -Total $43,423 20% C/E 6 F© Znglaecring and Overhead 8.685 TOTAL $52,108 2. Bridges to be Constructed by Flood Control District Contractor A. Sapphire @ Banyan Street $ 81602 B. Hillside @ Beryl Avenue 16.609 Sub - Total $25.211 10% Contingency _ 2.521 Sub -Total $27.732 102 Engineering sad Overhand 2.773 TOTAL 530,505 3. Total of 1 and 2 GRAND TOTAL 587.613 r EXHIBIT "8" / j� Page 3 of 3 r E construed as a release or waiver of any claim for compensation for damages which CITY or DISTRICT may have or may herelnefter acquire resulting from the construction of additional facilities or the alteration of existing facilities by either CITY or DISTRICT in suck manner as to cause unreasonable interference with the use of AREAS OF COl4ION USE by the other party. 1 2 Within sixty (60) days after determination of final accounting and reimbureability analysis by Department of Water Resources, DISTRICT shall present to CITY a statement showing detailed breakdown of actual coats involved In the design cost, aveihead, and other coats directly attributed to BETTERMENTS. CITY may audit DISTRICT'S accounting of BETTERMENT costs and verify DISTRICT'S statement of BETTERMENT actual costs, which verification will not be unreasonably withhe'l should such additional auditing be necessary to clarify or adjust said statement THIS AGREEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of both parties a R a R f a # f f f R f # f f f a f f # R f f f a f R f f a f f 't R a a f 8 page 7 of 7 of 8 II I_L E � , t I� O N 1167 , eZ �• II I 7 • • Lff P Z 0 8 L0'f M.f. 6/46 pJ ,G �r- m1'.100, ^p + /G •9 — '� 133 D }--- 13D2 ° o g: ^ a • =E C L 131 D ou me OI ru.n / GY -0Yl -1 n Fd IIIPN /LD �T. pal nt ���o47/YAS a ,3 za o � x o -. �y, nls 31 H, - �. N _ CT LSIDE \ °p°O OJT 129 I t�G 3` 0 rw,n D o avra•r I 1 i 1 — ROAD Tract lla 920L MH 129 / Lucamc tw "rbd rd tcad x Gaa�atwn La SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FFZVISIONH OWN. ET I DATE S../. C DP 1.400 /54 172 — °� _ � •• TE • r,� Y 4-4 171 1 \ LOT TE ITE c` I 44- I LOT /• y° /• /\ `:T I Jam. 10 \ I Z\ II \ n _ 12 I/ \ 13 V 165 �\ TE I 14 Q AVE-1 � I i 170 TE 0 V TE 'i I ' 162 15 o° TE 161 TE ► _ DFMEN9 CKEEK LlL1A MEL SAN UERNARDINO COUNT) e FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICI 0J rre�r No aaio (.`. MN NE: :IONS OWN- BY DATE :\ '•. ?(�• Trod No 89L2 z... r n SJ.C. FlLE NO. xj D.P 1.400/52 151{� rjU� D "g °4 LG? \ \n V LOT I�ll� �g ac'g�eio r �\ \* F) MOONT — CT —� x a U) LCT IO 3 L'T `\ " 5 � pct Gt S -- BANYAN- -� — w T LOT G IT D.P. 1.400/49 , TE TE re r I p w /u, Tig perty n SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Col 14047/2(4 bEMEIJ9 GREEK GN4IME•L FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AREA OF Ycr of Lot L 1'x te, Trx+ w mud REVISIONS OWN. 1r DATE COMMON ✓SE rV SJ.0. P-rs N,! FllE NO. D.P. 1.400/49 , 3 / F•S � - / NEO I T: 9ti N,°. v f.E N. a!� ; w mot' —0 m Ipr I , , 0 / � a � \ / Al M �•' ` n y . ARiAIAO' ,r .I—t� - R' 60M/� a m 6RS U 70. - 0 W 50 \7 iI / \ O I_ N 4 I A I V I .� 1 O STREET 63 SIERRA vISTq _ STREET ` — 31 0 _I i ym Inln L i •� �aa y' °I u'A m RAC'r I: +J ?883 Iri.6 11681 CUCAMONGA CREEK LOTS 5,6412, DLI:. 2fi ! IO CUC HOMESTEAD ASSO Rele A. A °0 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 4I FLOOD CONTROL DISTRIC CARNELIAN _ _ REVISIONS OWN. BY DATE — \ STREET -/.P. J A.0 6-2679 0 L / 3 L ! D.P1.3 0 0/1 /1T6 0 M E M O R f N D U M DATE: September 26, 1979 TO City Council FR09: titre., H Wasserman City fiunagar SUBJECT: Staff Ing Recommen6tione The City Council has received it detailed report and recomaendatfon from the Director of Cotsnuntty Development concerning staff needs which veto not anticipated at the time the city budget was approved in June It is tacom- mended that the position of commu•tity development technician not be filled and that the fends appropriated for that position be used to employ an additional clerk typist to assist in processing the large volume of work in the uummunity Development Department • In addition it is r •ommended that one additional building inspector be emploved by the Buiidtng ivislon While this position was not recommended for funding it the ttme th, udge- was approved, we did indicate to the City Council that n nece na, dev. p during the year for additiunal personnel At the time the .ten wa� unst..ered, the City was not certain whether or not additional ball - nut tunes would be received Now :hat the funds have been guaranteed, it is recom nded that the additional position of building inspector be authorized by the City Council Jerry Grant, a city's Building Official, will be avail- able to answer any questions the City Council may have concerning the staff recommendation. LHW: ha.. El 7` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOIUA . NDIORAIDUH Date: September 20, 1979 To: City Council From: Jack Lam, Director of Community DavelOPastt Subject: STAFFING RECCH4U A IONS CLERK TYPIST Technicl was approved, the Se at 111 unfilled Is Teo find than dieetolthe rant the in work f.av from the professional staff that the current clerical staff is iiundated with c'erical work. Furthermore, the volume of phone calls and eo�nter inquiries have increased beyond the capability of the current clerical staff to efficiently and effectively ram out all their clerical duties Tharefore, staff requests thatp nor itionofLCommu1 be Development • Teclutician be replaced by a Clerk Typist to the budget other than a cht,ge In the poildvn. rurthemorewrit fana� staf requests the City Council approve the purclw a n a,Other typ clerical position) Thera would besnaichanges in dollar amount delayed this the Community Development Deponent budget /DDITIONAL BUILDING INSPECTOR A the tiro the budget was proposed to the City Council, an additional posl- e tion tlon,ohowever. wasnnor recommendedptcethe City CouncilgforvfundinC. mInstead, this position was to be set a side for possible reconsideration if bailout fund, came through. At the time this inspector position was requested, the work load had steadily increased to the point where an additional inspector was required to maintain on adequate level of inspection services. Since that time, however, we have experienced a further increase in building permit activity caused by comoettial and industriul projects, to the point where the re fy hiring two additional City can now currently justi buildiandtshoving the ng (111e39a find attached the information aupf rtinB the work load standatds relative to manpower.) wlrinout the addition of inssppecti n personnel the quality and level of inspection somices will decline, now starting to The current inspection staff is doing a tremendous job in trying to maintain a hyper - activity level, however, the Increase in activity has reached a point where it becomes Critical that additional help be provided. To further add to this problem is Ile reaignatlon of one of our current inspec- tors, leaving the City extremely short handed in inspections. While at the present time we can justify the hiring of two inspectors we request that at this time only the additional inspector that was requested at budget time but 73 E Staffing Recommendations September 20, 1979 Page 2 placrd to bail -out limbo be currently funded so that we may lmediata v advertise for the nry position and the vacated position together. Cost for the additional inspector would be as fo Llws: Salary and benefits - $14,250 Vehicle - 6,500 Radio 1,725 Desk and Chair _ 800 TOTAL $22,875 RECOiNENDAIIOW Staff requests that the City Council approve the replacement of the Cosaonity Developeent Technician position with the position of Clark Typist and equipment no additional costa for the budget) and approve the hiring of ar, idltional building lnspector with vehicle and equipment with a budget irpa I of $22,875. Respect ubmit[ed, JACK LA4, Director of Community Development JL: cm Attscheenta: Building Official Report J it E N 0 R A N D U Y DAU' September 14, 1979 • TO: Camnunity Duvelopment ///Dire ter FROM: Building Official SUBJECT: Additional Insptetlon Personnel At the time of budget approval, a request for an additicnal field inspector was deleted from the budget, largely b ^.cause Rancho Ccanongs's financial picture as unclear at the tics We had proposed the fourth inspector P3ai- tlon to ac:omplish certain koala, aea.ming that workloads would remain at the level being experienced during the first few months of operation. Since that period, permit issuance has steadily increased In the first 5y months of In. the Building rths, Pe�trlesuaneeeaveraged 651 per onth21a substantial increase Con. 6 nnrths, p Cn,eyuent ly, inspections have increased accordingly. Deter lding Snepectionue'dminlntratore,� 1 falstaffi been dependant upon geographic characteristice, camolefor of construction ive eeta, legislative direction and administrative conceo yl Building cInnpectiont5arrices and efficiency. Racently, • Department affl gmeasurements''hacebbeen derived slWe believer the Orooia Countyl method cal hoth can be applied to Aar era idly cicamanga xpanding area. aaftmiix arc similar dersitics jurisdictions, 1 e u rapidly expanding and an evident devire for qualltY and types, varying from t to urban, construction A7 Chot•gh [he he methods used in Orange Cowry have beep. Applied prSnclr: lly to specl alined inspection staffing• the conclusiooa can be judgmentally modified to determine reasonably acrurate criteria for Rancho Cucamonga. re nesultss in an averagealloca tionsofn16r combination minutes perinspectiont including�t r office time travel time, record keeping, etc , or 30 inspections per day, by the per man. Predicated upon the number of permiitd asconeervative8cetimateaoE 6a Safety Division since the firs[ of January, inspections required per permit, to perform en adequate inspection job staffing level should be: 4433 ** x 1.5 x 6 / 30 - 1nfaalssof fields staffing per year. Considering vacations, holidays, 329 mi usuage, each full -time Inspector is available no more than 235 days per year which egrurtes to 5 66 field inseectora required to achieve Orange County standards * Since Jan. 1 we have been averaging 5 28 inspections per permit and are losing ground in keeping current on old permits • ** 8 months total Of permits issued. 75 Moat- urisdiction$ ,,,tiVO l r 5 stat in active. compost boat, at stop "her r1rop thuds Case to Be 2 th1nB the prdetntIIine the aps z 4°astea. o 9 10 be i °sp tell S, . Sorc CV u�ptn ctha o�e �n fie11 L�1 have eaYlY basis Co£fo °lr oo da edlnB I've cabli JanuarJ 1 e�Ytojecci °d Yo azi8+ +2. f 8, °uin8 oc 1 uthocls an at hitSnB 0 �° reversin8 Lelin4 ffable p 1ns4a�tnyoira 99 std 0 curtentlY Usti ,ads of u°u1➢a1 pruBreeaXitelY 110 ore 5 totot) Se S,vcls and votkl ar' follau' (aPpr end ins ec at staff taorou8nness of 'ant 0 u4 anal fi son d analYoio of tha din8 Divlstoo ,s nor a Lua oddici an a 8u1c f h� e.Cectiven e9s of careful comp°pcd the obe W Bono Lnac ` e hiBi+ SnB 11oblilrY• my 'one fair ° Alter cameo aft sic ide4 telY es Contra1Pra4 to tad clam anJlor at u111 limit ctncn Cut tmin8 inspec lops caused ni iderable tick tWrt a8 �a�ao¢l.1 most for petmita ficial is+9p Divlslon that Our 8 Onfort g6Z). ate oad per the 8uildne8 resencad at of tw an at, 0 ( tie' va,kl it as 'cc been Ths arB°mant has %d for one (59 ) In COmP° °d its no 628 so Uot b J 1A8 next .ns4action inspeccl ttacte• uA 615 :warn I Ins " pO�asao ^i1050 due as hies been prop so scalls v sm fo*�d'� 1.52 �t' _ mica f°a, perIIite as %amunt ci tna i 16]0 dsrlo U pecdSnB ,,ire afnhu'Te s9 eve s ath ce the unissue to BrO pa campieco issued sin a cnntinsa °c N Y 1 cLto t of is to tioR so ctnv L Subts tP.ma 150 east ttnC ?role duo CC49L det cone od• and it' co kee4 abr tMO tot wiles yell as a years• ' County he 96 foe uc too Jag rd c �0rai next ru as toupeeCnet the Aexc coo oY S iz °• tots ecce over ne vill °ccupY and o insPpC ananus 4yb L 4a�01 1aeP "lots to reap inspectors vill b° vols• u th no posieiva inspectors dalin4uenl ' vislou a44r0 he14 vldias I as fc thus• lviKhouL any nev subdi of hiring hourly falifor County °itolty 9 years, d the Vossibl £itm in 5 ` r and s°ma nedicotto a and idea in +e la -ti 1 also explotia tonsultiRB at lances scion Ycem vs e L I bay° ,the sing to the CieY vicao, Add It n, crate gio es within I On 'on v1s, its vices insP ctae aced in piece em4eory as as 9a become xPOriente Sn action s °r l4 �ted two 'at i° on able In sent "s loyee on has but "t, an rsodi1V notes, be Ss 4u°s[i that p "one aors at it red raetutcin8 far vacen The c odd Y to Rt • position +opm° nY Opinion, S• In my rulaeQectory G'V* °oa tho abxLe++t that they a nova rep uitcd for 22 co uni yeas 4 oft. by to th L osltton uitfout laY ressed by met' l field p B by arrticlan. chat tha�godo scicy c°nc unleso addlcloM olloca ca funding It Sa cl ° Cucla.aonBO as 8olldtaB 0i d [.net the CicY council at�ntu cc if ibruloho dicCate4fot oche balance of the £19c i1 Y ° °t is race s M to ,f antitlpa A bteskd°u6 ® attached• page 3 W ty Ontario Upland Pomona Yorba Linda Rancho Cucar,onga Personnel /Workload Surya Population Area Aver. Insp Sq. YS Stops /day 65,000 35 50 45,000 14 40 85,000 25 60 26,750 16 24 49.500 32 39 Fo. Daily Inspectors Stops /Inspecto. 6 8 3 3.5 11 4 5 4 6 J 13 Work Record Sept. '78 through Aug. '7i P 'Xnlh Iotal Inspections Total Stops Total Psreits Issued Sept Not available Not Available 130 Oct 211 Nov 450 213 Dec 746 205 Jan. 2482 753 235 Feb. 2206 638 288 March 2619 708 603 April 3059 819 611 flay 2706 926 692 June 3089 906 636 July 3120 870 514 Aug 4089 1001 854 0 0 0 � l ;age 4 Estimated Costs for 2 Additional Pleld Inspectors Salary/Frange Benefits 2 Automobiles 2 Two Nay Radios 2 Desks and Chairs TOTAL $23,500 13,OGOa 2 650+ 1.600 $45,750 a May be deferred. Mileage allocatfoc vo-ld be noceseary in amount of $2,000 if autombiles are deferred. l