Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/02/17 - Agenda PacketC3 f M E M O R A N D U M TO: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer FROM: Robert E. Dougherty, City Attorney DATE: May 7, 1982 RE: Ronald Gray - Bond Status Inquiry Form. Pursuant to your letter of transmittal dated May 3, 1982, and the attachments, -opics of which are enclosed here- with, please be advised that I will need copies of the follow- ing prior to comment: (1) Improvement Agroemontt (2) Bond or bonder (3) Bond inquiry letter referred to n your letter; and, (4) Copy of yjur letter of April 19, 1982. RED:sgg Enclosures RECEIVED MAY 101982 CITY OF VJ00 alw. tncu;curlNO oJK$tgii u r. COVINGTON 6 CROWC GIAY 211982 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Charles S. Doskow ENGINEERING DIVISION Doskow 6 Novak Attorneys at Law 222 North Mountain Avenue Suite 210 Upland, California 91786 Re: Our Client: City of Rancho Cucamonga Your C ens: Gary Bou4 er Dear Mr. Doskow: Reference is made to your letter to me dated May 12, 1982, regarding certain property in Rancho Cucamonga owned by your client, Gary Rougher. On the Same date, I received in the mail a copy of the letter from Ronald G. Gray to the City Engineer, Lloyd B. Hubbs. That letter indicates that a carbon copy thereof was also sent to your client, Mr. Rougher. A copy of Mr. Gray's letter, and the enclosure, are enclosed herewith for your quick referenca. Would you care to comment on Mr. Gray's contentions axpreeaed in the second and third paragraphs of his letter? Very truly yours, COVINGTON 6 CROWE SY: /l T� ROBERT E K 000G R' City Attorney for the City of Rancho Cucamonga RPD: sgg Enclosures ca: Mr. Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga _, „or _ rj� ."O..erw .1 u. .qi we &, •.XT. "nee, � uwn cwowc .Oil O.IK[ sow ism ••• ••+..0 owu.io. Cnwowwln ones fO""O4FO^O" May 19, 1982 •[..[ \ L »KII[W RECEIVED GIAY 211982 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr. Charles S. Doskow ENGINEERING DIVISION Doskow 6 Novak Attorneys at Law 222 North Mountain Avenue Suite 210 Upland, California 91786 Re: Our Client: City of Rancho Cucamonga Your C ens: Gary Bou4 er Dear Mr. Doskow: Reference is made to your letter to me dated May 12, 1982, regarding certain property in Rancho Cucamonga owned by your client, Gary Rougher. On the Same date, I received in the mail a copy of the letter from Ronald G. Gray to the City Engineer, Lloyd B. Hubbs. That letter indicates that a carbon copy thereof was also sent to your client, Mr. Rougher. A copy of Mr. Gray's letter, and the enclosure, are enclosed herewith for your quick referenca. Would you care to comment on Mr. Gray's contentions axpreeaed in the second and third paragraphs of his letter? Very truly yours, COVINGTON 6 CROWE SY: /l T� ROBERT E K 000G R' City Attorney for the City of Rancho Cucamonga RPD: sgg Enclosures ca: Mr. Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga _, „or _ rj� CHAPJ23 1 DOSKOR' LOUIS C NOVAK HARK A. MGRAM DOSKOW 8 NOVAK A omm 99 N MOUNTAIN A TNUD. SURD 910 UI NDIC FoRNIA 9M6 May 12, 1982 Robert Dougherty, Esq. Covington a Crowe P.O. Box 1515 Ontario. CA 81792 Dear dr. Dougherty: 11W) W6•1001 17W 085•lan 11 �'y cotr This will confirm our telephone conversation in which we dis:ussed the city's attempt to euforce a $5,000 bond agair.et certal.t property on Foothill Boulevard in Rancho Cucamonga now owned by my client, Gary Bjugher. You advised me that you had referred the matter back to the city for further information, and would be hearing from them within a couple of weeks with respect to possibility of a valid claim against the bond. You further indicated that the possibility might exist of simply assigning the bond to my client for enforcement. We will appreciate bearing from yoll when you have had the opportunity to fully review the facts of the situation. Very truly yours, L Charles V. Doekow CSD:dg CS- 7o -w<ai �t 4r, , RONAID G. GRAY RECEIVED mlilnm (VRICA®I1Nl.VR il. NORTH aivao AYONS fASnr T�WTS90H.V.amOfNG.Sap.�nenR MAY 12 1982 ovum cusvRwn ., SIL CUT OF 1UNCHO CUM06GA CERTIFIED MAIL UMNEERM DttIS103 May 10, 1982 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Unit "C" Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbsi I am writing in response to your letter to Balboa Insurance Company (copy attached) requesting payment on their bond in the amount of $5,000,00. Per agreement with tor. Bougher, et al, upon sale of the underlying property to Mr. Bougher, etal, in January of 1981, the responsibilit, for the improvements passed to Mr. Bougher, at al. The buyers were made aware of the $5,000 pond and the fact there was an approved plot p.an calling for certain improve- ments within 3 years of the dace of bonding. We agreed that the buyers would take the y:operty subject to the require- ment for $5,000.00 of approved improvements (per plot plan), and that we (sellers) would pay any amounts over the $5,000. 00 for the improvements so long as the improvements were made within 1 year and in accordance with the approved plot plan. Since the improvements were not made within 1 year of sale we, the sellers, have no responsibility for the improvements I have contacted Balboa Insurance Company and explained the situation to them. assure you my understanding of the agreement is correct and I hope not to have to be engaged in any legal entangle- ments. If you think a meeting to discuss this matter would be bene- ficial to all parties concerned, I will be a,,ailable at your convenience. Sincere y, on Enclosure 1 - RGG /lp cc: Gary Bougher /Lauren Wasnerman /Robert Dougherty - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED (CERTIFIED HAIL) j., April 19, 1982 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbiONGA n, PkDDy D. Srkt+ r ArOV 11. B,lap Joao Afkd, l,a, C. Fran btkh dA. Pdombo APR 2 b 136c "W.' •,.._- Balboa Insurance Company 620 Newport Center Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 SUBJECT: Bond No 605- 027979 Gentlemen: Attached is a copy of the Improvement Agreement aid surety bond in the amount of 55000 entered into by Ronald G Gray in conjurctinn with improvements to Foothill Boulevard required by Plot Plan 32 -81 Mr Gray has failed to perform the provisions of this agreement requiring the City to now take action to recover the surety due towards the igreed improvements. The City therefore requests that you as surety remit funds to the City t0 complete performance of the agreement If we do not hear from your office by Apri' 30, 1982, we will refer the matter to our City Attorney for appropriate legal action. Very truly yours, ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DI1'IS� VENLGHNIEUGER O CI cc: Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Jack Lam, Community Development Director Robert Dougherty, City Attorney Gary Bougher, 17238 Walnut St., Fountain Valley POSTOFPICEBOX801 • RAIiCHOCUCAMONCA .CALIFORNIA91700 • (714)90.1851 •� R ,r •i. �s �DA�® April 29, 1982 City of Rancl.j Cucamonga P. O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917;: Attention: Lloyd B. Hulin City Engineer FINANCIAL INSURANCE GROUP •u ow ..v.ww.o.•s.w u.+v«. a.no•m.wsv RE: Prin^.lpal Ronald Gray Bond No.: 1.05 - 027979 Obligee City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Itubbs: CERTIFIED FAIL k IAN RECoIIT REQUI TED In reference to the caption, we are In receipt of your letter dated April 19.:!82. Attached for your reference is a copy of the Subdivision Status lnqixry Form sent to your office In August of 1960. Please note that the form was completed by John Martin on /or about December 9 1980. Per Mr. Martin the project was completed and accepted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In October of 1978. Balboa insurance Company relied upon this Information as teing correct. allowing the bond to Lapse and also giving a return premium to the Gray's. Accordingly. Balboa Insurance Company denies your claim in full. Further, the property In question is no longer In the possion of the Gray's and the responsibility for the Improvements belongs to the now owners. We hope you can understand our ptpftlon in this matter and should you hale any questions please feel free to writs the undersigned. Yaws very truly. BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY Clams Supeervisor li E 1: E Bond Claims Department tdAY Qg 1982 PGR /Jlr CITY OF RANCIIO WfwYDNW Encl. EZAIIlEU M1 CrMI c:. Lou Jones & Associates VtlG�HlwK14 WNTWtYlwut[00 w.M+llfllYUxrl VtMA1`Q GMM,. NWOe wwwNC�tD, t0`QO,YOFR� W OdIW x}ww.� fD w�urwaun wv+iam Iro..wau.��awuareu...n:a .ro 0 :Baldoa Ansurance iiompany (tECCIVED 2900 W. Broadway DEC 2 9 X980 Los Angeles, CA 90001 (2131'37-8291 hutaDEEL SUBDIVISION STATUS INQUIRY Y/I.�ii!O aollggo r I es City of Ranchp Wcmonga Lou Jones i Associates City ktiCincor�/ W. Broadway P.O. Box 793 y os Angeles, Ca 90001 r4acho Wcamonga, Ca / x�l� ENVELOPE ENCLOSED L V J road Improvement; on Foothill Blvd. in Rancho I. Has this work been fully completed, • re tea 19-78 as ONO 2. If accepted, on what date?- 0 d' / 3. If not accepted, is work progressing satisfactorily 11 yes ❑ No A Percentage completod RECEIVED DEC 09 Wo A92 B C �tG29 �=•. Ctil OF RA;ItFO CI-11 C9fi.dUL1Tt U1al:ft'll t uFFi Pit 1211U11, gtglflttl111i'= tit211U1.151C it _ oflnti'�rnj - - -•• A C p E g M E N T Plot PlanlMinor Subdlvlalon/Nohtlehome Park This ACRELwYM, made and entered into this e � day of _L�.uli�5l" 19, s • by and between the cm[ OF RANCHO COCA+ UGA Stst" of California, hareineIter called the "CITY ", and �cA/RLA (% (1,64Y_ heralnefter called the: "OWNER ". WITNESSETH FIRST; that the OWNER for and in consideration of the permission great" by the cim to construct certain Improvements within public rights of way in that certain ?steel known as Plot Plan 82 -81 hereby agrees or his (its) own cost and expense, to firnlah all required equip - went, labor and material, and before the expiration of two years from the dsta hereof, to perform and cmpleta !o a good sad workatsnlike annsr the fOIIOW%t•a work and improvements, to wit: = aastruct road Smproymente on Fx1jlJ t Rdvd_ In Rancho Cucamonga, Said construction shall include; 219 linear feet of curb and gutter; 179 linear feet of aiJewalk; one eomecrcial driveway approach: engineering and staking; all nece -nary grading and paving. And do all work incidental thereto. Said Standard Drawings and SpecLlicetloas ats on file In the office of the Acting City lengineai L and are hereby made a part of this agreement, and said work and lmproverucs stall be done under�R supervision and to the sattsfae;Lon of Said . Acting City- Znglhssr hereby agrees to pay for all inspection of the wo i, as require ,tithe CITY' - The m estimated cost of said work end improvements It the a of - no /100 Dollars ($ 5,000.00' ). •, SECOND: The CITY , the Acting City'En9lneat+ � .and all officers sad employees of the CITY. shall not be accountable in any ancer for any lose of or dameas to the rock or any part thereof; for any of the atsrisls or egalpeant used or employed in performing the work; for any injury to any parson or Per 014, either workman or crayons employed by him; or for any lnjuriep or damages to persaa And property the OWNER or his Contractor having control over ouch week mist property guard against. THIRD2 The OWNER shall itdemnlfy and hold hetmleas the CITY .. tbs iwacin9•A Civ Laginear and all officers and employees of the Clra from all suits or actions of every nemes kind, or description brought Coro or as a result of any Injuries or damages raceivad or sustained by any person or persona, by or treat the WN@, his contractor or agents or employees of the, in the performance of tYe work herein. FODdTIit It is further that the gMBR will at all times, up to the eonple- ttoo and acceptance of said work or improvewnts. give good cnd adequate warning to the traveling public of every defective and dangerous condition existent within public rights o! way, and will protect the traveling ptblic from said hazardous conditions. It Is understood arJ agreed that until the coap(etion of all requir d improvements, the subject read or reads shall not be accepted into the City Maintained Road System. OMR say, with approval of the Acting City Engineer , closa all or portions of any street when hard necessary to protect the traveling -.'.lic during the construc- tion and /or installation of the required improvements. FIFilit It to further agreed by the parties hereto, that the 174MB ui11 furnish good and sufficient bonds in an amunt not less than the esttr.ated cost of said work and improvements as specified herein for the payment and faittful performance of the tens and conditions of this contract. Said bocdo mr;, be in one or tore of the follow- ing format (1) cash deposit, (2) botd by one or wore duly authorized corporate sure- ties, (3) instrtarent of credit from one or tore finantfal Institutions subject to regulation by the State or Frderal government pledging tbnt the funds necessary to rat the performance are on deposit end guaranteed for payment and agreeing that the funds designated by the instrument shall become trust funds for the purposes as set forth above. Should said securities become insufficient, the OYNE. agrees to provide supple- mental surety ae required within tan days of notification. All bonds shall remain in full force and affect until all work is completed and accepted by the CITY. SIXTH: It is further agreed by and between the parties hereto, includiag thx surety or sureties on the bonds attached to this agrecnen., chat in the event it to deemed necessary to extend the allowable construction time for the completion of tht work as required under this agreement said extenaium may be granted or denied by the City Council and such action shall in no way affect the validity of this agree- ment or release the surety or sureties on the bonds attached hereto.. In the event of such extension of clam for completion of the work required hereunder, the CITY may to- eatiemte the valor of incomplated work based upon current unit prices and adjust bond amounts accordL-.gly an required, and in the event that the CITY brings suit against OMR for alleged non - compliance with this agreenant and judgment is recowred, OMR shall pay all costs incurred by CITY in bringing such suit, including a reason- able attorney's fee, to be affixed by the court. ATMIST7 CITY OF CHO CU tiG\ y � . Clerk of the tity of Mayor Rancho Curh omega (S ature of Prineip+I aturo of- rnnclptl} -�� AGriL -C CITY )?tc gy Deputy i (Title) -k "• S U R E T Y HON D Faithful Perfutaance Plot Plan/Yinor SubdlvisionAlbbilahoce Park Bond No. L05- 027979 WmEM. The City Council of the City of Rancho- Cucaainga, State of California, and Ronald Crav (hereinafeer deuignated as "principal") haw entered Into an agreecnt whereby principal agreen CO install and cwpl•;a certain designated public Improvements, which said agrearant, dated August 8 . 19 78 , and identified as pro)tct Plot Plan 82 -81 _ is hereby refereed to and rode a part hereof; and WHEREAS, laid principal Is required under the tetra of said ograsmunt to furnish a bun for the fslchful performncs of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE. we. the principal and Balboa Insurance Cemeanv as @=cry.,,II&C"y. hold and firmly bound unto the City of Rancho- Cucasonga berainafter called, 00C,p0,1 in the ;ensl sum of ME TR]11gA" aim will •n.a---- - - - - -- ,,,dollars fS ) lawful monsy of the United States, fo. ..m payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourcelws, our heirs, succassors, executors and adainfstratora. Jointly and severally, firmly bl these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the abee, bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, adminiatrstors, successors or assigns shall in all things fraud to and abide by, and veil and truly keep and perform the coaensnts, conditions and provisions in the sale, agreement and any alteration thereof made as t'nerain provided, on his or their poet, to be kept and performed at the ties and in tte smear therein specified, and in all respects according to their train intent and meaning, and shall lndemify and save bamlass CITY its officers, a !ants and emloyees, as therein atipulated, then this obligation ahull become mill and wid; otherwise it shall be and remain in full forue and affect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the fats amount specified thereon, then shall be included costs and reasonable e%pensas and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incuread by CITT in successfully enforeina such obligation, all to be taxed as costs ant included in any Judgment rendered. The surety hereby'itipulites and agrees that no change, ixtenafon of time, alteration or addition to the tarn of the agreement or to the work to be performed thereunder or the spaclUcatlons accompao;•ng the sans shall in anyvise affect Its obligations on this bood, and it dons hereby vaive notice m any such charge, extension of time , alteration or addition to the term of the agreeownt or to the work or to the specifications. IN WTTH3SS WHEMP, this Inatriw nt has been duly uxecuted by the primcipal and surety above nomad, on Auxuet 8 . 191-8. Rom - ray hd_C bins, InsncalS:e Company ee Attoaney -in -Get A. E. Lae MfEI Sae back aids for acknowledgment of execution by Priwlpal and Slaroty: land must bt. attached to agreement, w i n o BALBOA INSL1"N$:F COMPANY RaNANTORT ! [R ORIVa . N[MORT 0 EACH. CAUFORNIA La*a 694-8z6o CPA_ 1303 GENERAL POWER OF ArrORNEV wssu vane oxe••ormo KnOwAlMetby These Prernln, 'That INLDOA INSURANCE COMPANY,• ^wvavka dWy mgactred and xsb•IngoWer rise laws of the State of Caafmn6. and having its pit rips] office In Newp -q Beach,Oru c,tauto. diUomU, dies by Net: presents mkc. constitute and appoint W Anaheim veil SUUd �altf —Or�. lu wean�ludvt An• -- — mt).sl n ram• wl:h NV,...vrr and ontiwdry hereby eonferrM N Its name, place ?nd Head, :. eaecute. *etnwledge and delver and to bind the Company thereby *fully and NtLesame tineal a U such bands were signed by the President. scaled w the aicrate seal of the Comps-1 and duly *nested by its Sc -y. Catchy ratifying and cenfumlod W that the said Attmney(sW Fan my do in the premises. Svid appolnlRent is made and" and by sathodkv at the following resolution sdoptal the 1Lraeu t f Dlrtcot s of the Balboa Insunn^ Company M a meeting held on the yynd day of March. 1%7. "Be Ic RemMed, that the nesidwt. say Vice- Prnldent. any Secretary many Assistant Secretary shall be and Is hc-ebir rested with full pawn snJ autamity to appoint Any am m same satiable pass:• as Aromm)(s),In•Faa m represent and act fm nod an behalf of the Cauepuy na)m to the folioneg pmAsbna: - Scrdonl Atlameym -Fort. Attocop -In -Fact maybe e• full pownand auNmry fm and In the aim o(and on behalf of the Company, in amtt. uknowkdge and deliver, any and all Itonds, reCognkanns, contracts• agreements of Indemnity and other CosdMond or ablipe my undertakings and any and all notkes sail decemrnts esuceting or let _lasting the Company's habifity tlnreunder. and ua such Instrm vice a asccrtted by any such Attorney La-Fact AQ be binding upon the Company sa I N1mcd by the Presiden: and a• Anted by the Corporate Secrauy.'• In NTh:eu "ern J. Balboa to m same Company ban nosed UH= presents to an I and by W C r V f rn lt rn c s d n n t and mt47tq aalmbe heneh clued Nt. 15th A.y of FehrnArV A. D.. 192L t. ( BALBOA INSURA DUMP r f By State of CyhfonU ge County o! Oran ' f u'• I On O. •„r,.aa day of Feb rit a ry A.D..19 - beforemepenwilynme Jack N. Tra DD men :.mwo.wb•bdagbyruedulyswero•did depersanaduy. Wthemideeln- H1SS1On Vte1n. Cal fn�tt that hell Sr, Vice PreS7denL _ofIULLBOA INSURANCE COMPANY. the company described in And wbkh esecoted the above' met• that he knows the and ofuUC=Wr. that the seat :!finedm uid Instrument U each Corporate send, that Uwan An affixed by order of Or Board of Directors of said Company- and that he signed Lis timed thereto by like order. OFRGAL S•AL ��� / J 1 •Oi Ja NO P.Nie up fswidau . wl,re IN a. InA 1. the undersigned Sceretary of Balb a Insure m. C mpany, hmby m try that the abme and foregoing is a futL we and torten copy of the Original Powerof Atimmy issued by sold Company. and do hereby furthercenify that the said PC cvofAttmmy4atdl Inforce End eBact. And 1 do herby firth: eeaVy that the Cenlfintien of this Power of Atmrmy U signed and r sled by fanlm(ls under and by the authority close fallers1ug resolution adopted by the Bond of Dheatan of the Balboa Insurance Co --,Any z. meeting duly mUe.l •and hcW an the 24th of Much 1974 and that and resolutim has sin been amended m repealed: "RESOLVED, that the afgutureoftho Smeary m my An{sUat Sacristy alibis Cormation, and the "af this Co pontbn. may 1- bflbcd or printed by facrlmlle to any certificate to a Poo.. of Altura -. of this Corporation, and that stub printed fanimee signature anJ *cal shall be valid and bbsding spin " Corporation." GIVEN underby hand and ibassaln/ A 2paay.y1fewpmr Reatb,CWfeenU.m. a day of w�u33ttrr g 8 I } L t , (=Frr OF SAN NERNARDIM TRANSPORTATION DEP,IRTNENT RJN CNCINEEAINC SECTION RIW WRITE -UP CHEM SNtET ROADS AREA FUNCTION Nc:JAV PARCEL rO. 04MA OF RECORD ADDRESS CITY SSAT6 up PRILIM. TITLE REPORT (Yes or No) CQtPARY N0. 1_2'; -49 "1&12 494 VESTING! DATE: INST. WMk -, Ma fo21 LATE: -1_i „_L.1 INS?. NOOELCSL PAGE z89 1) DISC. PREP. BY: DAM CNICRID tY_�DATE t) AREA COMP. tY: DATE CIQCAID lY DATE I) AN PUT BY:_ DADA! CNIcl= tY DATE A) DOC. TYPED r.! DATE: PRDDP AttADt�_D1Tt S) DOC. b PLAT TO RN AGENT BY DATE: NOTE: ENGINEERING F1RN: ADDRESS CITY tUTI PHONE EIP CODE ENCINKLR RAKARRS: pL& E Y ZOO' t-rn 4 ,” q G z 2 oe A.C. 0 I 0 .1Q t QTY OF �i LL IiAN040 QJGIMOPM CITY C xiNTaL AGENDA rill Lion's Park Ccemacity Center 9161 Base Lino Road Rancho Cucamonga, California February 17, 1982 - 7:00 p.m. All Stems submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in vriting, a71s deadline for Submitting those items is 5800 p.m, on Thursday prier to the first .md third a'ednasday of each tenth. The City Clerk's office "calms a1I such items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. B. Roll Call: Frost_, Mikels_, Palombo_, Bridge , and Schlosser C. Approval of Minutes: January 6, 1982 and January 20. 1982. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. A. Tuesday, February 16, 7:00 p.m. - Etiwanda Specific Plan Meeting - Etiwanda Intermediate School, Community Room, 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. B. Monday, February 22, 7:00 p.m. - Planning Commission Meeting - Lion's Park Camunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. C. Monday, March 1. 7:00 p.m. - Terra Vii.ta Meeting - Lion's Park Cormunity Center. 9161 Base Line R ^ad. 7:00 ps0,wty 4,,,,,.,-, 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The tlllo:rlrg Consent C8/end4z item are orpccted to be routine and ran- contre- mrai +l They wilt be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. a. Approval J. Warrants. Register No. 82 -2 -17 In the amount of i $700,990.55. 10 b. Alcoholic Beverage Application. Pizzaco Enterprises, Inc. 4 Numero Una Pizzaria, 8998 Foothill Blvd, for on -sale beer and wine eating place. E �1 City Council Agenda -2- February 17, 1982 C . Alcoholic Beverage Application, The Circle K Corporation No. 1029, 10110 Foothill Blvd, for off -sale beer and wine. d. Refer Claim against the City by Julie Anne Bohannon, Thomas Jenkins Bohannon, and Nary Ellen Bohannon to the City Attorney for handling. Provision of Street Sweeping Services for Private Property Owners by Contract. The Council is asked to make a policy determination on the feasibility of the City contracting with homeowner groups to provide routine street sweeping with Cit,- forces and equipment. All costs plus overhead will be reimrbursed to the City. Recocmendation: It 1s recomneided that the City Council approve a policy to contract with private homeowner groups to provide routine street swefping by the City. All costs including overhead will be p,ld by private property owners. f. Acceptance of Agreement to Purchase Tax Deeded Land by the San Bern,rli•,e rcvnty flood Control District. Recommend that .ru+:il a•,••ave tie agreement with the San Bernardino Cront,• F•evd ' •' District to purchase tax deeded land. 12 14 g Ac, 1 ar:,'. . a%tion and Additional Improvements in 19 Assfvs ".-r M. 79 -1 - Kacor Development Company. 3r agreement to allow accelerated improva- e EI to be included in Assessment District 1. h. '• ..C. or vi the Chaffey -Garcia House. It is recommended 29 f,. : %,e 44staric Preservation Commission that the Chaffey- tlarr:ta n'o use be relocated from its current site at 6295 ETieeand, Avenue to a sate situated Just south of the Eti- wa„fa r;ngregatioaal Chm —,h be approved. I. Acceptance of Nap, Bonds, and Agreement for Parcel Map 6724 36 David Development - located on the northeast corner of Hellman and 7th Street. It Is recommended that Council approve the map, bonds and agreement for Parcel Map 6742. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -28 A RESOLU"ION OF Tot clTy COUNCIL OF THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HL? 6742, INPROVEM14T AGRELMENT, AND IMPROVEMitfr SECURITY. 37 City Council Agenda -3- February 17, 1982 • J. Acceptance of Parcel Hap 7012 and Real Property Improve- 43 ment Contract and lien Agreement - Crescent Business Center. Recommend that Council accept the subject map and lien agree - ment located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -29 44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT A.NO LIEN AGREEMENT FROM CRESCENT BUSINESS CiNFER AND AUTHORIZING ThE MAYOR AND CITY CLEF "A TO SIGN THE SAME, RESOLUTION NO. 82 -30 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 7012. k. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien cn _ Agreement for Director Review 81 -11 located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, south of Devon Street. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -31 51 A RESOLUTION OF 1HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM OEASON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND COSTA- FEP14ANDES PROPERTIES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. 1�. Release of Lien Agreement and Acceptance of Lien Agree- 55 ment for Joseph and Rebecca Bonneville located at 5844 East Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -32 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CoCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOSEPH W. BONNEVILLE AND REBECCA A BONNEVILLE. e is n _. e City Council Agenda -4- February 17, 1982 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -33 57 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOSEPH W. BONNEVILLE AND REBECCA A. BONNEVILLE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. m. Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lier. 63 Agreement from Donal Glover for 7954 Etivanda Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 63 -34 64 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTiY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DONAL GLOVER AND TRACY GLOVER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME. n. Update of Resolutions 81 -30 and 81 -154. There have been new personnel replacing the ones named in these two resolu- tions. The updates will name these new employees. RESOLUTION 110. 81 -3U -A 69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DFSIGNATING CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDIN- ANCES AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO TEEREIN. RESOLUTION NO. 81 -154 -A . 70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or T8E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA UAMING THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO WILL BE ALLOWED TO S SN SWILL CLAT14S COURT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO BUSINESS LICENSES. e. Request authorization for city manager to attend League of cities one -day Legislative Conference Authorization is requested for the city manager to attend a special legislative session sponsored by the League of California Cities in Sacramento. The primary focus of the session is to review the fiscal impact of the proposed re- duction, in State revenue which are proposed In the Gover- nor's budget. Attendance by members of the City Council is also encouraged. a 1 E 0 City Council Agenda 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. -5- A. ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNE.1 OEVELOPMENT_N0. 81 -07 (TT 11869)- ROBERTS GROUP. pro pos p ann un t ete opnent of n con oo iaa units on 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -23. 25. 3 26. February 17, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 164 (second reading) 71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 252 -23, 25 6 26 FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R- 2 /P.D. FOR 9.75 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND HIGHLAND. B. ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -08 (TT 11928) SHAFFERIWESTLAND VENTURE. A propls�e panne development of t�units on 5.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -32. ORDINANCE NO. 165 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 252 -32 FROM R -1- 10,000 TO R -2 /11D FOR 5.85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCA. TEO ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND, EAST OF ARCHIBALD. C. REVISION TO TITLE 10 YEHTCLE AND TRAFFIC OF THE MUNICIPAL 73 WFiL T E L C CORRE TI N9 N R IN HD N 111V SL SPEE LI S UN CITY STREETS. ORDINANCE NO. 169 (first reading) 75 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY JF RANCHO CUCAIIONGA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.04.070, 10.04 100, 10.20.010, 10.20.020, 10 40.010 A A 8, 10.052.030, 10.52 040, 10.56.02U OF TITLE 10, VEJHICLES AND TRAFFIC. D. CREATION OF RANCHO CUCAMOfIGA'S INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. ORDINANCE NO. 171 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE NEED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR Fr =• AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AID ESTA- BLISHING SUCH AN AUTHORITY. city Ccdnr 1 Agenda 6- February 17, 1982 • RESOLUTION NO. 82 -25 60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIrI OF RANCHO CUCAONGGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79 -01 ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE INDUSTRIAL EVEL OPMENTBONDRAPPLICATION.� RESOLUTION NO. 82 -26 81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE SITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY DIRECTORS OF ALDEVEL PHENTBOARD THE IN USTRI I AUTHORITY. E. APPROVAL OF VICTORIA PLANNED CO"ITTY M0.5TF.R PLAN OF 82 s recanmen a t, t unc approve e a opt on of the master plan of drainage for the Victoria Planned Community and incorporate that plan into the City Master Plan of Drainage. CRESOLUTION NO. 82 -35) 83 A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY VITORIAO CUCAMONGA, ADOPTING THE CIAPLANNED COMMUNITY DRAINAPLAN F. V OF COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO_1. t o unc cert y t e v ronnd adopt 0.ev151on No. T to the ;nV9T@2RS;n. torm Orain Naster Plan. 80 RESOLUTION NC. 82 -36 /1, ,�--- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PREHENENVIRONMENTAL E STORM D AINEPOLAN REVISIONTHO- " G ZONING ORDINANCE AMENIXIENT N0. 82-01. - An ordinance app rov- 61P. 105 ng on ng r nance yen nt - modifying Section 07.19(b) of the Zoning Code providing `or regulation of compact car and bicycle parking spaces. ORDINANCE NO. 172 (first reading) 1 07 CCALIFORNIA. OFORDINANCE ANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AiENDME11T 82 -01 MODIFYING S SECTION OO)COMPACT ZONING CBICYCLE VPARK- FOR REUUIT /ONF CAPiAND ING SPACES. r 0 :ity Council Agenda -7- February 17, 1932 S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. DEVELOPMENT AORCEMENT WITH LESNEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR OEVrEo 112 80-34. 117 units ocate on t e rort e: corner e�emon and Haven Avenues. Staff report b) Jack Lam. B. STATUS REPORT ci, 0,1 :IMANDA SPECIFY, PLAN - City staff x111 up- r1A ante • oF-1 n oi�3it a prcgr: ss ldale by the Ettwanda Committee on Na preparation ,f the Specific Plan. Staff report by Jack Lac. L. CQMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM: STATUS REPORT. 7p3 reev sta wic accomp s e to a e an require -- next steps. Staff report by Jack 'am. ' 0. ELECTION RESOLUTIONS. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. 125 RESOLUTION N0. 82 -37 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO16!CIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, :SYr3LISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACF_. APPOINT- - ` 1NG PRECINCT BOARD HEARERS AND rlXlllr•. CWEN- S ^TION FOR THE GETMAL MUNICIPAL EMIlutI OF ,AID CITY ON PIESOAY. APRIL 13, 1982, HERETO - rOR CALLED BY RESOLUTION ND. 82 -1 OF NZ CITY TUNCIL. MOLUTION NO. 52 -;8 19g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMWGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CMVASS OF THE GENERAL MUN:CIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK. 6. CITY ATTORIIEY'S REPORTS. 7. ADJOURNTIENT. The meeting will adjourn to a Redevelopmcnt Agency meetirg n u Y Y YI1 O JII a � O M Ma' y Vr {h{ S JW V V t t E !O a O ua O "J O V _ 4W N , OO�OOJ MtY�Y�wsMMOOPOnOPNO�YnJ NflP erw PaA�JPO�y. -Tw arQT e1+YV11 RI�OPerrynJPati wffr o W - o•.+ NPVrNn. P. �n. osoPJ. wnn.�...�.�.�J�JISJJJJJ...nnP,. nn..�y.aaeauaaaewn.��.w...n ��� w �opoo- rnn.w.y.Ja� wo--... r+.r-- r..r�r..•r�r......r�rr„r� ` > i » >OOOOOOIXi00+rrr-rNMWNMM1MMYYVNy WVMNNOPYIyNNNryNNNNYNNNYM /wINNNNNryN hylyry Y � t aawPP Or�M.,JwP MOrNnaP aI.aPOrM�JP ariTO M�Jaa MpOrlVnJwaM llprNn.T V�pw sPOrN:y wPwa A R 'PPOJa »faO1P1aOPPOTOPOP >ILTOOOOOCOO rrrrrrrrNNNwJyryryyyynn JY1n a s o0 0 oeoo: o• IOOOOOOOOOV��000wv000000- r��-- �rr�rr„rr„rrr - - s� PJP OPf� YIOPp P iJJ }POPO���sO IPPTP OP }CJPJPP PCP } }PPWPTp O OP }OOP o° voo�ovo3oveomiro° Ogocooeu: E000vooaoo�000aeov000peoo�oov�00000e000 $ogouoeoo h r A r T f f f C t f ( f f f C f f f ( ( ( ( C — = - - - -- = - - - -_ --- ------ .------ .- - - - - -- u a P....O.n°mn eNN ...r°.p..o ° °o ° °°in °oo° °° N�•°` �OO1Oepooaooeaaw ..aweoop.�owoowr.r. pN a°Am .M000OIaopOOfM�NOOQOPp >OmpOy00 Pw Y.Oan w �In ^OrPOMnO�POa< OI�IVyp°pOmnhOOAmn.J.pp..rrryyMOf O_mOAVMParwpnOl.O p.1�0p�«N Y1.I r0 +0 -I n nnpM.nnamnp� rOgl. mi�nrOmnn•mrpper..rppny.me <�Y jy POrf�OmOfrO l.° INr/1 Z a1M.reM100+0_n Pp•N w wNn r(r N N P • q q On rN p On nN F 3� N .1 L w I w 1 N f Y J I � < a I : I L I I v HNNNNNNNMIM.NNNI4VM1NNnyMyNNa Iy)NryyynnN VNNnMMIn /1HrynNNNNNMVWyNNMryMiIyN evaaamv{vvavawoovemvvmmvm mvemamvaaaemwemevemeaammm .mrvv «{rmmvv ti' M' FMIFVnNNVMV�Wn�W� 'IM1Nnh�WYNYM1NNM1NnNMV .'IwnM1A1M1NM1lYN�ry�y I I Y e r r Y z L V W s ii �ru L fai J°Y T J �� s iva{ WN�� = Wro.,y O L VL�iW UN W r {y }i�u0 l 1>Zt= V YN{ J i VN < �n {Yy/ RW <Ja_�NSN_1J�)Iny \p{ <Fra I V.. i OW rWm JMO �OS im }r aJr.._v <Ut< = < O O<VW tvJLFm ZY Vi mmrJi./UVa _� _ f °y ZV \lmiV a.w�t�W> 7a`1r W�4)O ..N V ai a a�Y a<�J O <{� <r6tr G pa<i�ta LaV�JVsaWMO.�IO<VVI wY t aZLV =OW CNmai s r✓a S-p� ti z' ' > ""'"1O u Wp 3s�ays- .+RZSJVaaa z3 z J p � u arcs : zw upa p+�u�z�J r <�� aCna z up) vnr pv....p�Vanu> zWaspyaJeS.i�.w ' Z W Ypy Nl jrj {N \1V .fi.Wi OV. a.blS t W pumSYV _amUV «2SrN0 <OZV�YpLmO �< 3 erii >ONP�Y<rWr_ J iZvW MIy •WsVJ s WWUZR V. J p S- i� i..rJ.r JV<V7 aii > J{_<JJLJ .W.RrJf.Ur._..Z . _OsV asO paXW Rr < —C a aMMvOaOw mrapMWvW l.. l<aaWS>.a .\ .aar _YJ J;<aZt Y Y <am<NNN w:e��' own:° cn °o.e,NroNO�rop °o� °e$.N. °e���iu� ..°ooaoi �v oi,°..°o.°..^.nNi.'".�nw °p.°.n• o�+>.�f°xp�e NM.Nn.r.�vv..w��W Vwa•Ww.nnoaaaaafwaW . vavo e•ornw..nn..r..... ..nmvemamm•am<uvvavmw r m V < ry.M.MMmAO+NaaeMY>Ownan MmPp�ynM Y.o-N YMr1 ^ : a faaalla�` M= -f"rfY�Vy�JaOeee"aeOrrM1wMFMmrgm mO<macYppp y-fNp., p= r10�°�p000 p00 l'Ar) < i pppA00POWO0)OOATTOOT_ >PIp00 POPO >p >CAPp>OOPpATppPPppOPOOCPpP apQ,opp PC. p O tt��� = OOa00oovaopoeao voo006000pap$$$poo°$$000a o ooppopoppp000ppp opp$opo 1h�. 1 or r r r 1 1 r n W V V s •4 O-O pOMM1 OOOO.rO000NO000pNN p/)O OILY -OCna pO 0000en0000N000OOeN OOOOOn r �nnOMnpN NNOOM +rpp-p000 OONp � N^ryN -DOq gNI000Nw0•/N1100p0 -OM VNNIr OONY NN :NO ! n !N Mn P O O N n n O w V N N \ O w N I N 6 r e : Y r nIV J .S u- Sy L O tt 1q t I ` i ;�1• \ \ \ \ \N���� \ \Y��! NrnN \ \NNNNNN.y Yt Mw.�rww. =••.M NTN•.PPPPPPPp ��...wnn.�,ap b NY \ \ \ \ \N•IWVI•HhM•�i��••M.\i -ANN ��MiO\I;N Y_ W • • QNr •f i Sa > O rMi i�> V SV r E ~ >OWN 2 V v JgaL � LL LJWO Y Y O NN rziV W LL =i V.OWtJ O Nf}N.�LL wzN xz- �isowr' r }o Yi.r°`r�o� O :i •S S.wi. W::y.y0 S -V7 ly V V O li 0OV60 f^rV iWVO ;rir2 +7•JV N••VP Y• OON >JS <M1 {}YfYN•piip � e OOW>W..J •W/p� wOfO>. V +may Y W >OW JW n—.O�O Oep pO.O2Wln...y yy > faY� = >I J••JJS WO >iYi YN.V fq.w�JwA) Off; 1� ~J SS . \-JSW 2 >J M.pl2. ..- q P••r 9� »i ,. V. JJ�SpVNNq•w�N.i1 N >rfJ 'LL W'N!•WNOeleNNNOa NN -n ONgl•p 000NOOP O W I qua ~wP -�N� OO NOOOPPOaN L' > NY�gPV 010 p. q•�NVOtigI gOOP p. Op q V r i M!� IOJN.•!M q}O- �YNI�•M qD - ..W`N.•.•...•..aapl.alala�lnaa � . Ngn/aYNWMNr )l pgCagqq qp qqq N<r! q E IDPp IPOlIV }Vp! }pppppP +pp }P PPqf i OOnO�00000000000YOOOpOOS0000Ep0} Ivi t t t t t c c f 1.. ' �=� }' - _.f..� . •'COPY M� Y .J. hVFr un.rN Yr Jr ...1..ww.p yr„1y Y /W.IgN IOR IyppepNC NItIRApt IKINJIfI f. [111m p IKlM1(L 161 Ir P'f•'ry IIIf O f>.w •. �t'^kw c.q r.RI1 •� Berw.i�Mr.. OA ..1w Barr • vim LRSrt PIZ" Rpm n.lvr:wf,.f..Iw e. R'rwr Lm:.MrlJrr -'l y �.1 _ L WWm m,JIU[NIIA /ft1 LL+CI A /vw =to z"mQB�� IIItwI rlr L4f W On.Pltlr L�wT•aaim�� r I 4Pl T,a t J. ofmnr .V i "Kni a modAc omu fu IfC S w4ao - acv- •• - - -•- e...... curse ow, [pri -�ln oak CA O'IYf{ • p- - -' . '1• IIw f.• wr1r. rrwg�l N!.4b�11 IQ II...1r w wWr1 rf J M 1rw.Iw.r N Y A1ry'4 C1L•MrcRSWr.16r..A...r>..11 •' S !d � I •'� �� 1rrw4 (wN b o rr6tw N Y � Iaw I' ti+YwMMty W. .ft— 10rr wdww JiJ •wRM MwM Pn Nkk tiyfmM4 // u 11 SI.II tI Gtvl+tfa. Rra s J `� B!2'11�p '1/y/B] -- yKO,� r..ww W� rry��.r ,.. sir r.•„� ytrr. wr whr.r ".-�irrw�r r4�+.Y •w +ru.a.r j•4•� •W.i �4 ♦. ��.ih r _ .r. O��}��},h(�l.,r..Y \.w,Y LV.,. ., Wr�r.w.r wYw..h �✓ �`i�� Mjf'f� ww.•+.V.wh�I. W. 'Y�4.r. ..... +.. �.L Y..♦ ;F "PUCAnON BY VIANSMOR A F.IIV WUp1fu C"J MYI.! Q 1wM•i.Y(O • qi cpnn wAam•hr.= _ T S ^�-N5• .r..r. l.ocartz pt es,„ ,„ lot vlcut 1 adjacent .4t afire -- f- -- - - - -- f=F(V, -" y P4 Pru.w. %Y°i°'�" �'�7 w�c%. Gc►rea+,+: enru I :5 0 .•r I V I 1 lr o....r«. N Ak , U. Cw Nnoa.,. 7rw.Y, ;.Y. •SIN 9AR HS"Id'1tDI70 .._.•�w4+YS.or rMrM .+...�.... 44 2 „YYW pYIIKWr{p a.�Nbr yw 'Ono Foothill Blvd. Pzl. OFF CALS HHrm d WINE •.w....vzW I uJ A". A . a 3 rnS{A p rU.MK.iO,(A HTl LMNA.. loru %E.LO _ w Mw r..wr N.. aw,c.l Yel •lI HO ti� r4 � b r ep.V4e N tr M,� � Itt•N..r•nS•.w.wwrrw ,Orr.e.,r..w N.J eM1 MI.a.S rw. Y.V9ar..• IL to srin w Cuaar,al C.M N _ �n 7uaesYlno _ tAe. 114 �;': lye +rwte .�•iM�r —. .�i.�w�+..� M.Y. .. �..�.h��W �V4 tay our u 13C E CCP.POb7TI07 �•T °lll�� •'AD ►IIGTION CT FItAN7I7ROR _ - -_ _ —_ -• a Sun :.:.: •:..mow:. �'- ��'� �....... tl .►yIn NIYn�.gl V OI MIY.nwl.t /y n c `• '•� ae�. >•aa .. FED 0. vy adn &bv l71r tlrl Fw Ltar...evr Aw ,Wr _ Md..l QtrN.d ra; _ - a rJ.dwY Iq.7 • � � - ,. ',rY.tY77F'ri' �'_ ._ I I � _( azpf9 � s.�aav , 'y�n p/dn �MM,fie�� PC°t"3• td _ U u a east e 1 Lw. 2-1 td:tt 14-* 1 uar orrm a ay.mDrsawroa ne.va iSD]OONLTt . MOW IWIF 2 D. Maf 0uwn�c A�yo ve t R E© 4 f d i2 cwsvD,n. uurwuu .vn Qom. -,,,_, CITY Of r"ANC1,C CU CAh1ppIGA g o,•, .0 wn V 1 ter. :hill CA Sca•L. 4 4 .$.7 rrS 31982 6 Att,,m be CIAI,,,, ,e p� 819(DIU11YI112181Q)S�6 6I i 7 8 CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMEUTAI AGENCY 9 10 11 JULIE ANNE BOHANNON, THC:IAS ) JENKINS BOHANNON and HAPY ) 12• iLLEN BOHANNON, ) ) 13 Claimants, ) CLAM FOR WRONGFUL DEATH (Section 910 of the Govern- 14 V. ) ment Code) • 15ICOUNTY OF SAN SER11ARDYI101 CITY) OF RANCHO CUCAHr "4GA; 3 %N ) 16 BERNARDINO COON I SHERIFF'S ) DEPARTMENT, ) 17 ) Respondents 10 j 19 TO THE SAN BERNARDINC COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; TO THE CLERK 20 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; TO THE SAN BERNARDIA'O COUNTY 21 SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: 22 j 1. 23• You are hereby notified that Julie Anne Bohannon, whose 24i address is 6020 Moonstone Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, 25 and Thomas Jenkin- Bohannon and Mary Ellen Bohannon, whose 26 address is 10060 Ramono Avenue, Montclair, California, claim 27 damages fro0 the afO:OTantloned governmental agencies in the 28 amount computed as of the date of presentation of this claim of '- V • II � ub 1160 Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). VA -2- 2 2. 3 The claim is based on the wrongful death of decedent, 4 Greg Lynn Bohannon, husband of claimant, on Cctober 30, 1901 at 6 5 approximately 6s44 AM in the vicinity of Foothill Boulevard, 6 approximately 500 feet Fast of •rurner Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, 1n the County of San Bernardino, under the follawing 8 circumstances. 9 3. 10 On October 30, 1981, the decedent was driving a 1970 11 volksr..gen •Bug•, California license number 140 CBG, at or near 32 the above - stated location. A 1979 Ford truck, California license 13 number 1N95386, was being operated by William Timot.iy Robertson 14 of 813 N. Euclid Avenue, Ontario, California, at or near the 15 stated locaion in response to the Sheriff's office request for a 16 tow truck to aid a disabled motorist. While &aid truck was being 17 operated on the roadway near the stated location, it entered into 18 the center left hand turn lane on Foothill Boulevard and 1Q proceeded to turn left by allowing :h0 right rear portion of said 20 truck to intrude onto and otherwise obstruct the left lane of 21 ongoing traffic, causing the decedent driver to collide with said 22 ' truck. Sheriff's deputies directed the actions of the truck 25 driver with manual and /or verbal inatruc Lions. 4 24 4. 25 1 Greg Lynn Bohannon suffered fatal in]orlva to his head 26 i and neck and died on impact with said truck. r 27 5. ).. 2B' ;; The clairants' claim, on behnlf of Greg Lynn Bohannon, VA -2- 1 was brought about as a result of the negligent and improper • 2 Instruction, guidance, control and supervision of the movements 3 of said truck by the :sheriff's deputies which negligence further 4 created a dangerous condition of the public roadway. Other b (factors of negligence are still under investigation. 6 6. 7 8 The names of the public employees causing claimants' claim on behalf of Greg Lynn Bohannon under the described 9 circumstances are not known at this time to claimant. la 7 11 . 12 The amount claimed at of the date of the presentation of the claim is computed a3 follows: i3 DANAGES INCURRED TO DATE: 14 • 15 Burial and Funeral Expenses Approx. $3,000.00 Loss of companionship, comfort, 16 care, support, society, inheri- 17 tance rights and loss of consortium Approx. $1,000,000.00 10 General Darages $700,000.00 19 TOTAL DA!lAGES INCURRED TO DATE: $2,000,000.00 , 0. 20 21 Al, notices or other comm:nicaticn with regard to this 22 clain shoulu be sent to claimants in care of the Law Offices of 23 Herbert Hafif, 269 Hest Bonita Avenue, P.O. Box 970, Claremont, California. 24 GATED: February 2, 1982 LAW q%ICES OF HERgEJtT liyFIF 26 HARGAR, T HOLM CRIPE— 27 -3 28 �rllo6.n�ILf [ - m,�j.{lyu,�auat ' 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY HAIL (1013a, 2015.5 C.C.P.) 2 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES= 4 I am a resid•:nt of the county aforesaid; I am over the 6 age of eighteen years and not a party to the within entitled act'onr my business address is: 6 7 269 West Bonita Avenue, Claremont, California 91711 g On February 2, 1982, I served the within, 9 CLAIM AGAINST A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY 10 11 on the parties in said action, by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, 12 in the United States mail at Claremont, California addressed as £ollowst 13 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 14 175 W. Fifth Street 15 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Clerk of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 16 19320 Baseline Road Alta Loma' CA 17 SAN BMNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 18 351 21. Arrowhead San Bernardino, CA 92415 19 20 21 Executed on February 2, 1982, at Claremont, Californie. 22 I declare, under penalty of per ury that the foregoing is true and correct. 23 _ 26 Ina A. Arnold 25 ' 26 27 I r Y8 U� „IItA M J 41• >I 9 0 V CITY OF RANCHO CU'CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROH: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Provision to Street Sw aofnq Services for Private by Contract A reque•:t was recently received from Regency Equestrian Estates Homeowners Association to have the City provide street sweeping of private streets within their tract. u Staff feols that the precedent of providing sweeping services for a fee is one that could provide a positive incentive to other neighborhoods to adopt the same approach. This could expand to allow a general increase in the level of sweeping throughout the City on a self supporting basis. The monthly charge is based on recovery of actual costs and would be $60 per month. Ic is recommended that Council approve the attached agreement authorizing street sweeping services to Regency Equestrian Eatatee for a fee of $6U per month to be adjusted annually. Respectfully sybitted, LB :jaa Attachment Wool rt I1 �J =A 70 : City Council Members PROM: Engineari- Division The final form of the contract is being completed in the City Attorney's office. We will be forwarding the document to you as soon as we receive it. _. 13 r ■ M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 U1 TO: City Council and City Manager 11 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Accede of Agreement to Purchase Tax Deeded Lang V San 9srnard ne_COUnty F o Contro D 9tr ce The attached agreement sates that the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors has author17ed the Tax Collector to sell to San Bernardino County Flood :ontrol District certain tax deeded property in Rancho Cucamonga. Staff has reviewed the agreement and recommends execution of the contract. RECO..V=ATION It is recommended that City Council execute said agreement with San Bernardino County Flood Control and that the Mayor and City Clerk sign -3n behalf of the City. Respectfully submitted, LHN: ao Attachment r� AGREEPENT TO PURCHASE TAX - DEEDED UIND THIS AGREEMENT, asara° th13 ,_ day of , 19 _, 111 and 40 between the Board of Supervisors of San Bamardino County, State of California, and the San Bernardinn County Flood Control District, pursuant to the provisions of Division 1, Part 6, Chapter B. of the Revenue and Taxation Code. E TNESSETN• THAI WHEREAS, the real property situated within the City of Rancho Cucaaonga San Bernardino County, State of California, hereinafter set forth afia described if. , Exhibit 'A,' attached hereto and made a part hereof, has been deeded to the State of Calfironia for the nonpayment of delinquent taxes; and ' WHEREAS, the taxes levied on the property by the San Bernafrdtno County Flood Control Dlstri,t are collected by the County officers; NOW. THEREFORE„ it is cutually agreed as follows: (1) That as provided by Section 3800 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, the cost of giving notice of this agreement shall be paid for by San Bernardino County Flood Control District; (2) That the l�ar•i of Supervisors of San Bernardino County agrees to sell to said San Bernardino County Flood Control District and said San Bernardino County Flood Control District agrees to purchase from -aid County the property hereinafter set out in the aforesaid Exhibit •A,• which shall not have been redeaved as provided +n the Revenue and Taxation Code, upon payment by said District to the Tax Collector of said County the sum set forth in said Exhibit •A" after the description of fue r ,.arty and designated 'Purchase Price,' within 45 days after this agreement becomes efrective. (3) That said San Bernardino County Flood Control District (%44 !will not) share in the distribution of the payment required by this agreement (Purchase by Revenue District) FOib4 63326 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have cause their respective names to be heivunto subscribed and their respective seals to be hereto affixed by their n:s"Itive officers thereunto duly authorized. ATTEST: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS • SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY M—ert-107 the Board of upery sors By — veouty (seal) ATTEST: City Clerk By Deputy (seal) ATTEST: By Chairman CITY BY Mayor E SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLUID CONTROL DISTI Secretary cy THIS agreement was submitted to me before execution by the Boa T `upervisors and I have compared the same with the records of San Bernardino C.,n _lating to the real property described therein. San e-nard ni;Y ax ector roved this _ day of _,,IS STATE CONTROLLER ti 6332D (cent.) �� u EXHIOII 'A• DESCRIPTION Purchase First Year Sale P_ice Delinquent Number Etiwanda Cactus Acres W 30 Fi Blk 1 $302.66 1976 22 ;- 201 -26 15022/2212 '3126 Etiwanda Cactus Acres W 30 FT O1k 7 $302.66 1976 227 - 201 -3.' Ex S 20 FT ST 15024/22720132 fi F Y s k tii y h .is 11, 1982 t VUVTES OF 711E BOARD OF SUPERVISUIS OF SAN BERMM0010 COUNTY, CAUFORM, lr•Ai1R100 D0. 82 -10 ttl F1QOD taxit0l`q a A10 ytWO1D tits. wT UTLt. tl SC1LT0 stOLY DSAiI Am tad a03A Want!. tC7Mtl�OtJtC IDd M NLLIn SACS Or VAtiW9 It L'3i Utw7[D ADDUD AlRtltat•1 MLNAlr Oo sctiw of luperriwr TVA%Md duly euavded by supant-n °0i ad csntd, cl fai]w1.2 cosol.a. is s4e2tedt tmnmrtty ca. 82 -10 DBNAs. by act•.ea takes by the baud of Supenlwn of Sev Atsatdtw Ceasty. !tart of Caltfatnfa, the ..x 411"tor of said county bas bare aatborlaad to Sell corals na- deaded property at Public aactloai W tt80lAl, ca'.'Ula aC said tax -daadd panels am aaaded for tba Palls uu of flood wstrel ad "t." aenSSrntiw pdrpowt bW. TWAM%Z, be It nsolads that yoraWOt to CUlter 8 Of no "aaou..ad Text[: Code, the lr4 lerusrdt Cousty rlsd wntnl Districts bud apa'a the Prosissa that the baulultar dncrib" pan*Z. of Pnputy an atdd for CM Aforesaid public vv.. Ural sakes larval ob7ectrea to 94 Public said Of Sa1A patoals ed outhcriaao tUic Parehus t ecnrdsaca vlth " Co "r A.snwr•. fartd 2023-123 -07 chi.* Trask "asasor'. Potosi 227401 -16 w7 CY+1 A.O.t.or'. And 227- 201 -32 Day crt k • "net'. Fucal w 342 -11,27 W ho Stan Drain "weer'. Pared 27 3-121.01 rat 6..a Oamd M R MTU t2SO M that the hark of th;A So.-4 .halt file vltb the Toasty Tax Conectce ad the CemtT "ard of lupantwn . cenlfld repy of tote rs.I.tios. YAS= AID AWFM by the eased of SupecrLers of tb. sae Umzdlw Ca®ty Tlood C.ctnl MWICt6 stare of "LLIOrvls by tba f.11wlo2 aotot Amt pm4r1lNSt Older, W- tivAln, McCann', Tavos.nd 110CS1 6Jf.:[F130L1t Mons AASM& sD7Qy150LCr Mattock d s...a MIT Of CALUVt O UTL7 N SAM MIXUD1sO co. — 1, Andrgl -pllhx� , Searetaq of tha Seard of lupanOore of the wa sernstdin Coasty •land Ceatrol Ui.trlc:. Us Nnardtw. w7lfonO. UnI7 "ttity the foce- Mttl to .. • full. taw sell ..tract rely .1 th. "CL n taken by .aid District Lord of lupenl.an, by u.Wevas auto a1 tbd setbsn p....t, sil.O tjT appears to the Official M .utes at said bard at Its task! of Jxnwry 1 wtadt Jan"ry 11. 1982 e. ec at aka bus pen was c Sae Arv.rdfos Casaty r.rA Outt.l old han Somardtw 0mty. CalM.". d L rJ w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TOs City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Acceleration of Construction and Additional Improvements in Assessment District No. 79 -1 - Racor Development Company Attached for Council action is an agreement with Racor Development Company to allow the acceleration of improvements included in Assessment District 79 -1. The Racor Company purchased lands south of Sixth Street between Cleveland and Milliken Avenue pre- viously owned by R. C. Land Company. An agreement with the same provision as the attached was previously executed with R. C. Land Company while under their ownership. That agreement included pro - vision for successors in interest to execute acceleration agreement. Execution of the attached agreement in effect Fulfills provision of the original R. C. Land Company agreement by allowing accelera- tion of improvements to transfer to the new property owner. The acceleration agreement will allow the developer to construct fronting portions of sixth Street, Milliken Avenue and Cleveland Avenue in advance of District formation but have the improvements included in the District for financing purpose if and when the Dis- trict is formed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council approve the agreement Rb Acceleration of Construction and Additional Improvements in Assessment District 79 -1 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement on their behalf. Respectfully a bmitted, LBH jaa Attachment nom_' . 4 G: } 've ACAEOOM RE, ACCELEMTI00 N CONSTRUCTION AND ADDITIONAL MROV1IMM IN ISSLNSMM DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 TRIS AGXl=MNT is entered Into this _ -ay of 1941, by and between the CITY or Rem= COCANDDGI, a municipal COrP0=tion (the 'City') , and X%MR :CvrwpmE" CO ?AMY, a California corporation (the 'Property Owner')• as the owner of certain real 7repeTty located within the City. R E C I T A L S s This Agreement !a pradlcated upon the following facts, A. The City hAa formed a special Rasesament district under the terra and conditions of the 'Municipal Improeenent • Act of 1917', hein9 DtVis,on 17 Of the Streets and Righwaya Code of the State of California, for the eaonotruntion of street and other Inrovananta, tc9sther with oppurtansnces and appur- tenant work within the lnrnrprrated limits of said City, said • special ulasement district known and d, slgna. d as ASSISS.NINT DISTRICT NO. 79 -1 'the - ASSeameat District'). B. The iv ,DVPMnta wmposed to be constructed in said AaNS'maat District consist Of Certain store drain facilities and major 'treat lmprovementa Ulm SIR=. MIL'.LIIM AVzmD:, CLEVELAND AVENUE and other strea *.e C. The Property Owner has purchased PNOperty from the RC Land Company, altuateC within the Aassesment Districte lying hetwean rourth and Sisto Streets and hetwsen Cleveland and Mil - l.ken Avanues and as outlined on IshLbit 'A' attached heratc. D. on iune 100 1991. the Ctty and RC Land COSpaey entered - into am AGRCEK Mr RE, AC ZMTIIN Of CONSTR9CTTOM MD ADDITIONAL - IMPROVV=3 19 ASSI.&Vtc R DI ICT NO. 79 -1. vharehy said Parties agreed that acdleration et Construction of the improve- war, 00781CXD �jil„J l n vents within the Assessment District by the a Lend Company would be reimbursed by the City. L. to order to facilitate the daweloprent of land lo- cated within the Assessment Districts the Property Cwoar say 0290 wish to construct, or cause to be eerretn,eted, some or an of the lmprerseamts proposed to be located in the Vicinity of the Property Dwaer's lrad in adram" of the ties when such crostruntlm would Otherwise occur Pursuant to proceedings being taken in comceetion with the Aseesameat District. She Property Owners therefore, sesks w enter into an agreement with the City similar to tie June 1P, 1921 Alteemeat bet"GA AC land Company and the City, as Psccifed in dec -1144 0 thereof, whereby the Pro- perty owner instead of lC Land Company would be reimbursed by the City for Ccostr cti.m costs locurrwd by the Property Owner for the IaD:vwemante referred to in Paragraph s basin and for the Additional Isprovueats described in section 1 hereinafter. P. The CitY and the PropertY Olmrr 09-44 that such as • acceleration of =,Structian at the Ispsowmeau would be bene- ficial to the arts, prWO•sed to hfi includod w•-thin the A229tsment District and that the Property Omer should be reimbursed for the costa incurred by the Property Owen+ it ^-onneetim with sa.d constructions such reimbursement to be contingent upon Cie sueecss- fal sale by the City of bonds of the AS9e22Omat Dfetri_t. 0. Tu'Property, owner sire wishes that Certain street and Stara drain Lapcoaseenu, in addition W the Imptowsmienu, be eoastrurtad and finan:od pursuant to the Praeewdinge for the Assessment Distrirts and. Provided that the PrOPOrty Owner is willing to bear the additional aar44aments associated therewith. the City in wMing to include such additional assessments within the proceedings for the Assessment District. News t8LA77mr the Wrtiea barstos intending : be legally bound hereby, and for and in consideration of the =tual 1•rtais* , -1- J lY representation, and agrtenanrs herein rontrined, hereby agree as follows, saition 1. Additional Isproetmanes. At the Sole option of the Property Owner, Mich my ha exercised by writtan notice to the City at any tire prior to the adoption of the City's rtso- lutim conflaing assessments In mm,,tlm with the uasswnt District, the City will cause to be lneluded among the loproee- Mate proposed to be constructed and financed through the Pro- readings for the useseasat oisttict. the construction of any And all of the Strett and atom drain SaPsaemants specified In C 'Mt 'S• harem as the Property Owner my specify (-Addition- al ImproeeWanta•) I provided than (1) in the case of such Addi- tional IMO MOMOnta which, In the judgment of the City's assees- mat esglneer, will be of special benefit only to land owned by the Property owner, the property owner shall have agreed that the additional assesto nt attributable to Such Additional Improve- Wants my be imposed upon the land of the Prmpsrty Owner, and (14) in the Lase of Additional Trprowamnts which, in the jndgwnt of the City's assessant mglmer, will specially bsnsflt other Ionia in addition to the land owned by the Property owner, the Property Owner shall have eithtrt (a) obtained she agratmeet of the 'mare of such other lands that the addltloaal asaesamnt at'tIbutsble to the Additional IePtoveants my to Uposed agelrst Bald lands or (b) agreed to My in cash to the City the portion of the costa Of such Additional ZrPru,nae me as. in the judgment of 'cbm City's assaasmeet engineer, will be of special benefit to lards other than the land awned by the Property Owner. Section I. acceleration o! Consteuethon. (a) plane and Seeelficatims /P1ds. In the event the Property Cwrer wish*@ to cause the construction of any of the Irprevenents referred to in Paragraph S of the AICITA13 or the Additional Iw pravtmnts refined to in Sertdon 1 hereof, the Property Owner ray hato Prepared Plasw and Specifications for eerb work and Submit the Sane to the City lcglnaes for hie review tad approval. DPon recaiDt of Such aPprotal from the City Engineer, the Property Omer my request bids for Such work front ltcansed cantractors (, ' as^ � . a-l- ... quallfled to Perform such work and will cause such bids to be delivered to it at the office of try Cit" Engineer, there to be • opesed In his praamm. Upon comPfetion of its review of such bids, and subject to the apprav,tj of the City Engineer, the Pro - Perty owner my award A contract for the construction of such work to the lowest responsible bidder, and. if it awards weh a mntcaet, the Property owner will deliver an executed copy the"- Of to the City m9larer. (b) Mstro� ion. Sharufter, the ProPertY Owner will "use such work to be raostrocted as Prwlded for in the plans and spaci- fiestins referred to in sobparagraph 1.1 and will allow Such work to be 'Aspects" by the City 2h9lneer at any and all time during the Perforaanp rharsof. in the want that any change iA the work !a Proposad, the Property owner will submit copies of all corres- pondence and doc nratatfoa Pertaining thereto to the City Engineer frr his review and approval. (c) Permits. Sub¢rt to Its normal ravfw Process and wpm Payment of anY applicable feu, the City will lasoe to the Proparty� Owner and/or to the contractor selected to perform .0 work, any AM all 1'cssea2, Permits cad approvals roqm!red by it In connection with the work described In subparagraph (A), including, but not 'lofted to, the llwnses, Pernfts and approvals required to insta l 'nProvemena in Public rights of way If any of the work is to be e rnatcoctad in such public rights of way. (d) iPlspeaition oft ts. Upon Cotmletion by the Drp- Perty Owner of any of the work described in Paragraph S of "a XCrTALS and Section 1 of this A9reeoent to the satisfaction of tha City . Englnesr, the Property Cwotr will sell to the City, and the City will Purchase from the Property 0wnar 911 at such improvements within thirty (10) day& after notice of Cmpletion is given the City by the PrOPertY Owner or receipt by it, AsseaAnent District of the pracaeds of the bands, whichever ocmrs last. or within tam other elms as in mutually agraetbls. Sowever, in affealm9 the porch &so described in this subparagraph, the City shall not be squired to pay the Property Own" from any funds other than such aaOuncs as may be made avail to it through the sale of bonds by the Aalesament District ... d13 -(- fhe account of ecmpeneatlw to be paid to the Property OWX by lesson of the provlriums of this see - tlon shall be the em of the following, (i) the value of any right of way which is not dedicated to the City ad of the dote of this Agre„rmt, which shall be determined in accordance with the method -elected for determiviDg the value of otner rights Of way acquired In cea-eo- tlon with the As2seneent District, consistent "Ith standard City acquisition practice' (including en M.A.I. appraiser) , provided, that cmpensation shall be payable only for right of way for the iayrovements# and not for right of way for Addltioga: impro -events specified In Exhibit •b•, (ii) the engineering coats actually Incurred by the Property Owner in the preparation of the plans and apaelfleatiens or the and Additional 3Mprowmnnes and in the swper- • visloo Of the contract, but only to the extent that such costs are determined to be reasonable by the City Engineer, and (iii) the costs act"IIY iacurree by the praperty Owner in connection with the coastructloo of the Improvements and pdditioral ImPinvnants, Provided, however• that the sane =hall not eviceed the arnunt of the lowest responsible bid for such work, plus the amount cf say change ordays approved by the City Engineer. (f) Transfer of Ownership. The Cityb obligation hereunder to Pay the Property Owner for the aforesaid lmpxovementa is con- tingent upon the confiroltlon of 442.8Wnt and successful sale of bonds and shall be null and void if said bond, are not sold within a twr (I) year period following the deti of this Agreement. SECTIO.Y 1. Prior to calling all of any portica of its pro - party lying bete -4n ypurta and Sixth Street$ and between Cleve- land and Milliken Aetn -es, the rroperty Owner will cause a copy of this Agrsement to be d411ve »d to each prospective purchaser • Of such property and will cause a copy of its letter of trans- aittal to be delivered to the rlty Engineer. potwithstandi., any ' s._ch sale, any aenunts required to be paid hers"or shall be paid - j. to cACOA De'sloPOent CO"Any and not to the p=rchaser(a). 1 _. 0 SELTION a The Property Purer eball not asalgn or trans. fer all of my Part of this Agreement, or any tight hereunder, to any Person. However, In the event that all or any portion of the PtOperty Ovnar's :and Mich Is duetlbed In Section I hereof Is cold, at the request of the rropetty Purer and the subsequent purchaser M the City vill onto. into an agreement substantially similar to this Agrooemnt with the purchaserfU thereof. IN vITNRSS WHEREOF. too Parlios hereto have eaurad this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorised representatives RACOR DEWLOFMMT COMPANY. r a California corporation en7 ey, rl u y Autnorxs ed Agwc CITY OF RANCHO COCA..%WGA, a municipal corporation A•TEST Sy, • a 9 . 14 010 -6- 0 f. 1• 1`e •P •Y• b O�6 txsinr. •x• '1 ti a� m� I Os of t � Oi I . m! Of I Of o1 01 1 a� ! I �. . 1 m: I O�6 txsinr. •x• '1 ti a� ml LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0 Descriptiont The land referred to herein is situated In the Cd,n:ty of San Daratdiao, State of California, and is described as foll"st PARCSL It tots 17 and 17 and the North one -half of lots 23 and 210 Sectlun t7, TQl Bhip 1 South, Range 7 Nest, San bornirdino :Wrldian, according to Nap of Cucaron9a Lands, In the County of San Sarnardino, State of California, an par Yap recorded In Sock 6 of paps, pays 9, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. PARCEL 23 The South one -half of lot 23 and the north one -half of lot 26, in Section Ile TChnshlp 1 South. Range 7 Nest, San Samar - dino Meridian, according to 1•ap of Cucanedga Lands# in the County of San Sarr.rdino. State of California, a e per Nap recorded in Soo; 6 of Naps. Page 9, In the Offic of the County Recorder of said Coaety. • EAIISIT 'A -I' • a _ t 0 \J 0 17®137! -a• AwrTICK" IMPaoVpWJm I treat leprovsaeats, lncludinq grading, paring, "the aW gutters to complsto the approved .,..at section, pet n- C1Winq etrect light, and PVblia Utility facilities far the followings 1• "- laprovaetntr to the ultiaata right of Way oft (a) the wsterly halt of Milliken Annue beginning at Birth sereat and r. ing aoothtrly apptaxlmately 998 feet and borderinq the property of the Prpp.rty owners (b) the easterly half of Clew /and Annua beginning at sixth Street W ruMin; aoutherly approximately 1659 feat and bordering the property of the Property Maori sad ic) the snotharly half of Sixth street fta Clen- land Avenne to Killlkan Ann" and bordering the Property of the Property owner. n sa(terr -3• fK • 0 r1 ►.J I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 9, 1982 01 %1? W7 To: City Council and City Manager From Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department By Mary Whitney, Administrative Secretary Subject: Relocation of Chaffey- Garcia House On December 8, 1981, the Historic Preservation Commission held a Public Hearing concerning the possiblo relocation of the :baffey- Garcia House. It is the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission that the attached Alteration Permit, detailing the relocation of the House from its current site at 0295 Etiwanda Avenue to a site situated duet south of the Etiwanda Congregational Church, be approved. At the Commission's request, this relocation recommendation has been submitted to the Community Development Department's Design Review Committee This proposal was reviewed on January 10 by that Committee and the relocation was found to be appropriate (see January 21 memo from Curt Johnston to Bill Holley regarding the Committee's findings) For your Information, the following Is a summary of the events leading to this proposed relocation: December 19, 1979, - Ordinance No. 93 was adopted designating the Chaffoy- Garcia House as a City Paint of Interest. March 4, 1981 - Ordinance No. 138 was adopted upgrading the Point of Interest designation to City Historic Landmark. May 10, 1980 - Correspondence received from Lewis Homes, Inc., reaffirming their offer to relocate the house to a more suitable site at their own expense July, 1979, through October, 1981 - Continual attempts were made by Commission Membprs and Community Services Department staff in procuring land from a public agency for placement of the house Etiwanda School District, Chaffey Union Hidh School District, Southern California Edison Company, and General Telephone Company were all contacted regarding such a proposal. None of the public agencies contacted were amenable to having the Chaffey- Garcia House relocated to their property. u c)ntinued to tans 2 x page 2 of 2 memo 2/9/82 to: C.C. & C.U. from B. Holley April 3, 1981 - Correspondence received from the William Lyon Company offering to provide a lot within the boundaries of their planned Victoria Community as a site for the relocation. (attached please find a copy of the alto plan submitted by the William Lyon Company.) It Is our understandiug (per phone conversation with Joyce Clendenin of the William Lyon Company 12/10/81) that the house will remain under the ownership of the William Lyon Company until such time as a civic group o" other entity can assume legal title and accept responsibility for renovation of the house and maintenance of the property upon which it is to be located. Thus, leaving the City free of any finbacial or legal responsibility in the preservation efforts directed toward this house. If you have any questions, please contact this writer at the Community Services Department, ex. 213. We request this item be placed on the C ,sent Calendar for the meeting of February 17, 1082. Thank you. p o a A is City of Rancho Cocamrga Applicatloa far HISTORIC lANDf11RK Alteration permit 10111TIMATIOg 1. Callon Chatter- Oartta %use L Historic a :_ Clarets Panels Rouss S. Street m oral eddt+s: 6203 Bttetnda Anew CIty:Bancho CLeanaase 21P: 01730 Counpyr 61n Bsrlardioo As+et+or's Pawl ee. Zan: Le9A1 Oescrl Ptlaar Of SO tut S. Block 'g' litle,moda Co] r L d 4. Present Qeor: Lathe Baas. _16-Address; P.O. Boll 670 City: CA IIP: 01.46 Oseerehlp I+: Public • Mnp x= S. Present Use: Rnsdenee Crlpinai Use: demidencs _ Other past vies: Remidraes 6. Premed Use:_, ttsched saran I Proiosad Work: wmdtion. r1m)"). Addition, etc.) relocation to e •it• mouth of ... Rtteanda Congregational Church located 11 Etivenda Avenue. S. Candltipn of Structure:_ Detettorated(see attached aevo) 9. Justification for Wart: Rouse prenrntl• sits on a site of a pl d eubdins..:a 10. Other Infareatlon: 6" •ttsehsd ncao 3/ 0 . `dp a. 3{, CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA �+q� MEMORANDUM DATE: January 21, 1982 TO. Bill Holley, Director of Community Services FROM: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner } SUBJECT: CHATFEY- GARCIA HOUSE RELOCATION The relocation of the Chaffey- Garcia house to the proposed site an Etiwanda Avenue, just south of the Congregational Church was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on Tuesday. January 19. The Committee felt the new location would be appropriate and voted in fa%or of the proposal. i CJ: jr r i i ✓7eNVTLLIAm LY0,V'_W�17,1.1 e 9612 ARROW HIGHWAY. SUITE K.RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91770 I'141 980 -1244 October 29, 1981 Mr.Bob Jacob 'HA Croap 580 Broadway, Suite 200 Laguna Beach,California 92651 Subjeccl Chaffey- Garcia house Dear Bob: tie have committed to provide a site 1-f up to 10,000 equate feet adjacent to the Etiwanda Congregational Church for the relocation of the Chaffey•Carcia house. I will have ty superintendent go out and measure the house so that we can give you the footprint, but meanwhile, I wanted you to see if you can get some maps of tha= area, in- cluding the church, so that we can begin to think about how that house might interface with the Congregational Clutch. The idea is, that in the near future we will wart to give e the Lewis Company-, who will relocate the house, the pint plan showing exactly where the house will go. Sincerely, V lLLIAM LYON COMPANY E Regional Manager Pmm ccs Joyce Clendenin Frank Jense Bill Holly �I p REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT I r PLP S P. C R. 7 RhlI-ACA.0 -- 4 _I w d riKcN ^ p�CopERT •s AAtP AQrA k 11 AONA7/OWo I "r TO 36 EA by THE W," /-YOV 60, lts� s • RXeusE �o41Ta�✓ Win LyoN Lo gvusp _ �IS/5 PwrEflwwEP AT cPeRry _ W A thTEJt PA75 a� 1°KoPOSSP Cl- itFF�Y 6AkL/A ya!(sF �ElPC,1T /P�1/ PE.^.eMzeR 7, /99/ ,i E 11 I� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City anginser eye Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician 4 H� SUBJECT: Accootaac�e of Map. Bonds and Agreement for Parcel Map S7i4 — Davie Development - located on the north- east corner of Hallman and 7th Street Davis Development is submitting Parcel Map 6724 for final Council approval. This map divides 4.79 acres of land into 8 parcels with- in the M -R zone and is located an the northeast corner of Hellman Avenue and 7th Street. An agreement and bends are attached to guarantee the construction of the following improvements including curb, gutter, pavement, spandrel, sidewalk, retaining wall, pavement striping, removal of pavement, concrete wall and appurtenant work as shown an 4.lan 4717. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 6724, the agreement and bonds. R� I tJ fitted, LDH:BR:1¢a AP Attachments 3� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNi;II OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NIGER 6724, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6724) IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, kND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6724, submitted by Davis Vevelopment, Subdivider, and consisting of 8 parcels, located at the northeast cornsr of Hellman and 7th Street, being a division of a porti-)n of the south 1/2 of Lot 7, Section 15, T. 1 S. Range 7, West was approved by the Planning Commission as provided in the State Sub- division Map Act and is in compliance erith the requirements of Ordinance 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 6724 is the Final Hay of the division of land approved as shown on said tentativa parcel cap; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to appro•:al of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delireated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to exacute the certificate thereon behalf of said City; and 2. That said Parcel Map Number 6724 be and the tame is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. PASSED. APPROVED, end ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES. NOES: ABSENT: Phillip D. Schlosser. Mayor ��qq ATTEST: 4� Lauren M. Wssercan, City CTe_,R i ■ • a3 s� {3 Cki N > Lij U dl z az€ z ELI, <12 _1 m Il r, r r 3� Ld Y YMAn 1 � �,-- 1, r r�Q i u r. r. CITY Of AA40ID CIAMOG • IIPRDa1MNT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL W ND. 6126 V= ALL TER BY THESE PRESUttS: that this agreement it now and entered into. in confamance with the provision of the runicipa Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Sete of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to a the Clty, 67 and between said City and oilliam L Da"P es — Davf Dnelo rats re na ter n rn ton %no, us,rigper. NITROSMi 71tAT. N4EUAS. pursuant to said Code. Developer his requested approval by the City of Pamtl lop NuDer 6724 in accordance with the Provisions of the report oft y q nnr neon, and map amendments thereto; located 1lortmast corner henna Arena and Seventh Stmt. and. UTEREAS, too Cit.- has established certain noulrvmits to be met by said Dsw eleper prior to grantin7 the final approval of the parcel supl and. M(EAEAS. the uecution of this agreement and molting of felimement trvrlV as hereinafter cited. and epemvad by the City Attorney. are deemed to bt equivalent to prior completion of sold requirements for the pupose of recuring sale appmralt f1011. Th7RETEAE, it Is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows: 1. Tree Developer hereby agrees to conttroct at Denloper's aapeass all • improvements de.eribed on Pala y hereof within rein ninths from eta date hereof, as par Seetim 7.12 of ordinance go. 26. 2. The ten of this agreement [hill be nine months commencing on the date of arecution hereof by the City. TV, agreement shalt be to default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said tan has been e.tended u hvmintter provided. S. The Deveimperomy rpuest additional time to which to complete the pro• visions of this agreewnt, to writing mot less than four wits prior to the default' date, and Including a statement of circumstances of necessity for addition) tlm. In consideration of such mount, the City resenn the right to rev!" the provisions hereof, including construction stand.rds, mat estimate, and sufficiency of the IMMvement security, and to regwlm Adjustments therto vlmv warranted by substantial changes therein, 4. if the Developer Lilt or neglects to comply with the provisions ef_thls agmemert, the City shall hlve the right at any time to cause said pra,11tont to be cogneted by any lawful ►man, and thrraupm L remve from said Ceveloper and/or his SureV the full cost and expense incurred in to doing. S. Encroacieeat pewits shall be obtained by ahe Dneloper from the office of the City Cn7lmer prior to start of any wort within the ptil is right of vV, and the Developer 1411 conduct such wort in full compliance with the re. gulatiLls contained themin. fbn•complfance ml result con stopp(ng of live .art by the City, and assessment of the pennies provided. 6. 7utirc rigtt of uar tepm.oent wort required shalt be constructed in can• fareance with approved lmpmroment plan, Standard Spretflcaticas, and Standard Drawings and any special aseadrents themto. Construction shall include any transitions r4lor other incidental sort deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. to �e • L I 'go 2 ,thogu "re A:REvw 7. Mork done within existing rtrett• shall be diligently pursued to cowslo- Lion; the City [hall have De right to [motets any and all wort In the event of unjustified celay I eoepletlon, cued to recover all cost and expense Incurred few the Developer andlc� his contractor by any 14wfw1 Means. S. the Developer shall a nsponlble for replatteent, relocation, or re- moval of any cospatuatt of any Irriptton water systee In conflict with the required Vora to th{ satisfaction of the City C"Ineer and the over of the watt tystee. f. The Develops- shall be resp atble far raeoval of all lootc rock and other debris I'm the public right of coy resulting frost work done on the adjacent property or within raid right of way. 10. The Develop" still plant and rintata partway tress as directed by the Coman-ty Drrelopeent Director. it. The tmrarearat security to be fw�ishd by the Cataloger to guaraato sappletton of the tarot of this drrevent shall be subject to the approral of the Cty Attorney. Tree principal anowat of said iaprmeaent stcwrlty shall be not Ins than the aeount shown balaw: 'KPRONEIIIM SECDeltY uilol EO: faithful Perforaance gad f r0,8M Material and Labor Bond S 40.400 IP w1ThESS MEW. the parties hereto have caused these presents 0 be duly executed and AcknaAdgd with all forwalltsex required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures- DEVELOPER By: DATE: �( BY: aEE:1t / VITNESS: DATE: 1 iy s C TT Di RA KW NCM(MGA, CALIFORNIA a suoictpal corrorstion ATTEST: CITY CEEAC DATE: wtv W. 050951 PPi103e(t SIASA199 TA1TMVL PERMMk Son tarzxcts, the City Connell of the Caen. of Rancho [Leavonpa• state Of California, and MULL. k. ORM 'Z of ho Cu ang agreement Wh designated prUm ya praxlCe w enter jaw an "In designated Whereby principal agree• to Install and complete nr- tarn QesSgeutW pmJlo lryrorsmnts. Which said ayyreemens. chic) 19 and SdYtl[fed es pro]Kt A EtReG re Leey LO ei CO Y e l piLt ermd 10117I1A$ent . aald principal 11 requires under the teres of said Agree! agreement. to furnish A pond for the faithful Pes Y foramace of id s01e. THERITOks, IS the principal and 61aeti Awarce ote any u onto c e as Is Y. are • a 'CSCY;I, In the Penal t' =yel °C tueaaon4a (hereinafter called Saa ffi.RAm aWM� arn y o n uses. or Ne payment o Ma[ op aw wll and tnly to ad made. w hind ounelras. car heir,, successors, exam- cars and edminlstrabOrs, Jointly and mvereilys liraty by these presents Tb• condition of this obligation U such that !f the abcr, bound ad principal, his or Its heirs, ¢Ketor,, adalvlatraWn, successors Or Sa&Sgns, shal) . to all thla9s sttnd da and Abide t oand Well am truly keep sad parfo;a tea tand to a. eondl- ne ens Drotlsfona Lt the Said a9re to et and am alteration thereof mods as therein prodded, on his Or their part• to be IMkep t and parfetmW at the time and in the mam.er therein spac- d• and In all respect& accordln; to their true Intent and agents �vg� and shall 1ndgenl[y and Save harnle,s City Its officers, %hall becameennut ant raids c1h*MLSsolIt *hall b and reemain In full foKJ and affect. to Neefaenart of the obligation secured hereby a04 to addition Costa and eYsmnnat specified therefor, there shall M Included aunaLle arPenses and fees• Sntludlig reasonable at- tomeY•I feu, L beW taxed a st a restfullyr enfominq Inch mlf9atlon, Ili to be tared as coats and tntl0ded In any ]udgmene rendered. The surety hereby ttipulatas amt egret that ra change. es- a"neleA of tisa, &iteration or eidition to the [Same ch nge I9resaene or to the wrk W be performed thereundar or the apte- iflcations accompanying the same shall Sa anyWlse affect its 04119stion2 on this bond, and It does hereby wi,m notice Of any such change, ettensten of time, alteration or Yditloa to the tares of the agreaynt or to the w t k or to the epeclflt&tions. IW Wirtlrzs lrA"mr, this "'tru'ant me Nuen duly executed by the principal and surety above mtc", on _.IStmry Z/ 3Z.• Willie, W. D'4' M, mtvle Meal is am) �'r LYrmtr tErnvn. s'tttb' �• AtmrtrySn -[act rl 0 Ll SID to. 05W52 llmaw, Irrl'd in partoman LKSOk AND Mrs. "ALKER MONO idRRA9, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, F-at a of California, and WIITJA•t [. MVi9 �u O1VI5 MVDOPeMS IhanLufter dsal9oeted es pr nu pe w 4nur into Su agreement vheru` y principal a9Tess te install and corplet• car - Gin daei9rated public Improvements. Which said egremant. dated , if and identified as pro- ject -� t osY wele t SwnN Shaft • hereby referred te •apart ran m , RRLr tg. under the terms of said agreement, principal is rs- quired before . tering upon the performance of the Wock, n file A good and Suffict.z' peypnt bond With the City of Rancho Coca - mngs to 20=8 the elaisa to Which reference is made in Title 15 (COraencing With Section 79[2) of port t of Division 3 of the CIVA Code of the State of California. NOR. TS1MMRE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate aunty, are held firmly hound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all conteaetors, subcontractors, labored, material - man and ethes persona mpluyed in the performance of the aforesaid aurSapnt AM referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil ►roredure In the a® Of t rt.,M•nand mM air. tee Osampicymant Insurance Act With respect SO Such Work or labor, that said Surety WILL pay the sap In an amount Not exceeding the amount harelexbova set forth, and 4120 In caw "It is brought upon this bond Will pay in additior. to the face amount thereof, costs and reasonable "Pansies and fees. Including reasmablo at- "roey's fees, Ucurred by City In Successfully enforCInq Such n Obligation. to be \Waed and fLxed by the court, and to be taxed SS costs and to by twlnded In the jodgmnt therein tendered. It is here bpyy 4VZOSsly Stipulated 2nd agreed that this bond shall Imam to the bandit of ay and all persons. companies, and corporations "titled w file shunder i under Title 1S (cormaneieg W1N Caution 1012) of pact 4 of Division 1 of the Civil Code, So sa to 9100 a right of action to than or their ,signs In any Stilt brought upon this bond. Should the condition of tAIA bond W fully performed. than this wllgatton Shall Decor NW31 and "W, otlazvlse it shall b and remain In full force and sfCoct. The surety hereby stipulates iced agrees that on change, ae- tonalen of tip, alteration or aaditiOn to the terms of said 49rement or the Specifications acealpanyinq the same shall in any nannar affacr Its Obligations On :Ass bond, and It does :are - by valve notice of any Such change, extrnaton. alteration or ad- dition. IN WITNESS WNC=r, this instrument Lee been duly exetoted iby rho. principal and &only above named, on J"'1Y 21 William, R. onvis fry Davis Dnelarmta _ _ &Wfty fnamarce Cotmry " " saty 1 ^TAerla • L] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer By: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance of Parcel Map 7012 and Real Property Improvement Contract and !.ien Agreement - Crescent Business Center Crescent Business Center, developer of Parcel Map 7012, is requesting final Council approval to divide 19.4 acres into 5 parcels in the M -2 zone located on the east aide of Archibald Avenue south of 6th Street. All off -site improvements except the median island on Arcnibald Avenue have been installed and accepted by the City. Attached for your approval in a real property contract and lien agreement for the median island adjacent to the parcel map. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 7012 and accepting the real property improve- ment contract and lien agreement. Respectfully submitted, C` v4te�4 LBH:BR:jaa Attachments =(3 r. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM CRESCENT BUSINESS CENTER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Parcel Ilap No. 7012, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street, submitted by Crescent Business Center was approved cn August 12, 1981; and WHEREAS, Installation of a liedian island established as pre- requis'te to Issuance of Building Permit has been met by entry Into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Crescent Business Center. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1962. i AYES* NOES: ABSENT: Phillip 0. Schlos`se-r-.-Fjjy-0r ATTEST: Lauren 11. Wasserman. City C erk �i p�1 'z K RESOLUTION NO `d a- 20 • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OANCHO CULAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP MMER 7012 (TENTAT1Vc PARCEL HAP NO. 7012) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 7012, submitted by Crescent Business Center and consisting bf 5 parcels, located on the east side of Archibald Avenue, south of 6th Street, being a division of the south 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of section 14, T 1 S., R. 7 W was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 7012 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said tentative parcel map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucan*nga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 7012 be and the same is hereby approved and the Of Engineer is authorized to present sank to the County Recorder to be filed for record PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Ca ren H Wasserman, C ty ; ar P . c osser, yor t 1 I i r< ■ �Y 1 t t i9 1(I ip iil(y i 7c j w w • � J N o 4 N / -�j- 4' 6L 1 3 � OI 6 � ; Li Y S< !j �s= Q L a Z •Li W _F- U t 1 I i r< ■ �Y 1 t t i9 1(I ip iil(y i 7c j w w • � J N o 4 N / -�j- 4' t �a t t RECOaING REOUCS= 9T and WHEN Et CORDED W.IL TO, CITY ' ALOE CITY OF RAIbN CUCAPWNCA 9110-C Ease Lim Road Post office Sax 907 Rancho Cueamags, California 91710 REAL PROPE9Tr IxpR -Vxff CONTRACT AND LIM AGIrExENT THIS . GREC67R• rude and entered into this _ lay of • 1991, by and betaesn Crescent AuTiaeso Canter. 1990, a anneral Partnership (hereinafter referred W as -Developer' and Oe CITY OP PASCSO COCA7O A, CALITORNM. a smieipal corporation (hereinafter reforvd to as - City -). provld.e us follow[ wmrA$, as a goerral condition precedent m the leruence of a building pernit for eomereial /ledestrlal d"GIOPnaat. 'he City requires the mrstrvction of Niauln7 off -site street improvements, lnclde in one -half of the median Island on Arehitald6 adlseent to the rroperty to be devolopdt and VVERRAS, the Developer desire$ W postroa Wvtruttion of such Lnprovexants until a later date• as determined by the City) and WHEAEAS, the City is agreeable W such POUPO.samt provided that the Developer enter$ into this Agrennint requiring the Developer W cgatt=t said fxproVIMets. at ua expense to the City after dead W do as by the City. vhtch said Agreement shall also provide that the City soy construct said Improvements if We Developer fails or neglects " do m and that tls, City shall have a lien upon the real property hsrelnaJ'•r described as security foe the Developer4 perform once* and any repaymnt duo City The mxlmm amunt secured by this lien agr"wnt shall be $46.000 00. NON, THERtrone, Tor P&ME9 ROWS, 1. The novelontr haatry agrees thst tACy, vtll Instrll o:f- •Ite street lmprovesent -, inchdinq xdlan Island. 1s accordance ant ever Xianc- vtth a:. appt cable ordinances. resoluticne rules red regulations of the City in effect at the tits of the Inatalletlea. , Said irprcvtmenta dull be installed upon ad along Arrnibald Avenaa, . adjacent W We Dovaloper's property harala Jwcribed. 47 '' I c I. The lea ullatlos of gala Ieproveswor, $lull W corplated not later than one (1) yuar follovldg vrltun no ties to the Developer free the City to eomenee tnatsllation of the Sam Installation of said leprolaernts shall be at on mpenre to the City 1. In the event the Developer falls of refursa to conplete the installation of said laproveseUU to a timely wanner, City nay at any tie thereafter, Upon giving the Developer erltua oti" of 1r, leteatlon to do ao, en rr upon the property hereinafter described and eoeplets said feprovePenr, and recover over, of coeplation IUeorrsa by the City free the Cveloper to the Marlene mount aacuree by this lien agraceant. e. To secure the perforeance by the Developer of the term Ana conditions of this Agra nt and to saran the reP 'leant th City of any foods vnlch say be arPundrl by City In ecepleting said larproveesnu Upon default by the Developer herev dar, the Developor does by there presents grant, bargain, sell and covey to the City the follovinq 4""Ibd real property Situated In the City of Limb Cgcaeodga, County of fan sareetdlm, state Of California, to- lta Parcel Map 1013 as record" In Paroel Map poet _ PA. a —., recorded Of Can Bernardino County, state of California. 3. This conveyance is In trust, hoverer, for the purposes dtdcstbed above. i. Onv, therefore, if the ocvalopor shall faithfully per`ors all of the acts and thing• by Nee W be done wSar this Agreteant then this conveyance shall be mid, othervlse, It shall reesln 1A roll for" and cffcc: and is all respects shall be coealderod and rated u a mrtgAge on the real property and the rights and obllga!ioac of the parties vitn eacpeot there -o shall be govern" by the p:vllslonl of W rlvll Cod. of th, fute of California, And •Ay :tker applicable allUte. peru'ni..g w swrtgages on real propertf _ 3 This Agreeaant -%all he binding upon and chall lygre _ = +!!a Waflt of No In'n eraocct. adalnlstra Urs, RUMOSSOrs end } V Y �� saalges of each cf W partleu hereto. ■ $. To the astent required to give affect of this Agceewet as A mrtgaqe, the tern 'Developer' shall sun 'mrtgogor' and the City shall be the 'mrtgagee' as thou tarty are used in the Civil Cute of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to mrtgaqe• on reel property. 9 If legal action is co®snced tm enforce any of the provisions of this Agreernut, to recover any sun Mich the City is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Dov-10pea to redeem the above - described property from the mrtgaqe ,seated hereby, than the prevailing party shell be entitled W recover its frosts and such reasonable attorosye' fees As shall be awarded by the Court. IN [ITNTS[ wRLNlbf, the parties hereto have executed this Agreeneat on the day and year first above written. CITY, LIDS CENTIR. LSBD CITY hLI 09 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIfOF RA• a monleipal • Ir �ny(Qgrtrrsdly • V corporation // L9� ��1Wos't - Ursa —TPartner BT, Bfs MIRMLIUCA OCC11FXfAL LIM DMLVA= Cd'PAT �45Lr D SCHLOSSeR Kayoc R. [. Newflel.j(vicv iRealdmt ATTEST. Aa. --mfu K [oettal City Clerk — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a , o DATE Z February 17, 1982 6 L977 TO: City Council and City Managor FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City rnginbnr BY: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Tech,:ician SUBJECT: Acce tence Of Real Prooert Im rovemsnt Contract and L en A reement or D ector Rsv ew HI-11 located HI-11 l on =9 west sldc Or Arch Avenue, south of Devon Street On December 15, 1981, the Planning Commission approved Director Review 81 -11 for the development of an office building and restaurant located on the west aide of Archibald Avenue. As a condition of approval, the attached lien agreement is being submit- ted by the developers for City Council approval. • This lien agreement is for cff -sito improvements, including curb, gutter, pavement and one -half median island. These improvements are being postponed because the additional five feet of widening on Archibald Avenue at this time would crease a hazard. RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution and authorize the Mayor and Cit•/ Clerk to sign and accept the lien agreement. Respectfully submitted, LBH K:}aa Attachments n 0 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY PiPRO:'EMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DEASON b ASSOCIATES, INC. AND COSTA - FERNANDES PROPERTIES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, Director Review No. 81 -11, located on the wrest side of Archibald, south of Devon Street, submitted by Deason and Associates. Inc and Costa- Ftrnandes Properties was approved on December 15, 1981; and WHEREAS. Installation of curbs, gutters and one -half median iaiand established as prerequisite to issuance of Builuing Permit has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Deason 8 Associates, Inc. and Costa- Fernandes Properties NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the Ci•y Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. • PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES FOES: AB: ENT: ATTEST Lauren M. Wa!serman, City Clerk V Phillip D. Schlosser,-Ta—yor 67/ w v E RECORDING REQUESTED BY and WHEN RICORDED MIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF MIX CUCPVM 9720 -C Site Lin. Road Post Office Sat $01 Rancho C"amonga. California 91770 REAL PPOPERTr 7NP0.0TTNFNT CONTRACT AM/ LICK ACREENENT PC at -it THIS ACRECTICIT, rade and entered Into this 25th day of _Jawary 1982, by and betvem Deasm S Associates, Inc. and Costs- fernandes Properties (Immiraftcr referred to as 'Carer'), and the CITY OF RANCHO C71CANQHCA. CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as'Ciq). provides as follow: WKEACAS. as a general condition precedent to the Issuance of A building permit for davelopmmt, the City requires the construction of off. site stmt improvements. Including curbs. gutters. Payment and one-half land. scaped median island. adjacent to the property to he developed% and IMEREA9. the Omer desires to Postrone construction of such taprove -• mints until a later data, es deterelned by the City% and UNIRFA5. Me City Is agreeable ten such postpa. rant Provided that the Omer enters Into this Agrtmant requiring the Omer to construct said improve- ment, at no *-pease to the City, after demand to do so by the City. W1ch said Agr~t Mall also provide Vat the City my construct sold taprmmmts If the Amer falls or neglects to do so and that the City shall have a lim upon the real property herainsftar described as security for the Owner's perfarmnce, and any repayment due City. NOW. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES KNEE: 1. The Amer heraby agrees that they W Il install arts. gutbra. - pavement and one -half medlon Island, Including landscaping and irr!gatlm, in accordance red Cmpliance with all aFgllcsble ordinances, resolutions, rules and rnulitfms of the City 14 effect at the time of the Installation. Said Improve - astnts shall be Installed upon and along Archibald Avenue. adjacent to Owner's property hereinafter described. 2. The Installation of said Improvements shall be completed wt later than one (1) year foliwing mitt" notice to the Omer from the City to commence installation of the same. Installation of said i provemsnts shall be at Ad "Fmse to the City. 7. In the event the Damr falls or refuses on complete the Install- i. atfon of said fprorements In a timely nsmar. I ity my at any time thereafter, n upon giving the Omer written notice of its inantion to do so, "ter upon the • L Property hereinafter described and complete said Improvements and recover all costs Of COAPletim Incurred by the City free the Ovner. t a. To secure the perfoMMe by the Over of the Gres and ta+dltlam of this Agnewent and to secure the repaymnt to City of sry funds which my be efpecded by the MY In cotpletfag laid Ignrrments upon default by the Amer here- under, the Amer does by that@ presents grant, harpaln, sell and convey to the City the following dmsrlbed nil prepertr Situated In the City of Rancho Cucaeongs, COonty of Sea bernardlm, State of Cellfarnn, tOMt: That Portion of the Fast 41S.16 fait of the North 770 'eft of the South UO feet of the North pelf of the Southeast Qaarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township I South, Range 7 test, Ssn Bernardino ileridan S. This emreyance is In trust, however, for the purposes described above. 6. Nw, Nenfon, If the Amer $hill feftt'u11y parfdre all of the acts and thing' by than a be doe under this Agr At, than this conveyance Shall be Vold; Otherwise, It sill reasaln In full fame and effect and in all ",Pitt shad be onnshhnd and treated H a wrtgage on the nil property and the rights end obligations of thi parties with respect thereon shall be governed ty the prwlsiom Of the Civil Ccde of the State of California, and any other epplluble statute, per- tatnieg to mrigagn on real property. 7. This Agntaent shall be binding upon and Shull ensue to the benefit of the hairs. aaecusore, SWAistntora. AatnHOM and asslgn$ of each of Ste Parties hento 5. To the tAtmt required to give effect of this Agrte,ant as a e,rt. Me, He tare 'Amer• shall Dean '.urtgagor' and the City Stull be the 'mmgagH' as those Sere are used fn the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute pertaining to Mrtgages an real propety. 9. if legal Action is coaeanced to enforce any of the PMIStoe of this Agreeent, W recover any tae which the MY is entitled to resolver fro we the Owner hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Cner to red,. the above -0e5crtbad proParty fret the wrtga7e created hereby, than trt prevailing Party shall be entitled to neon Its costs and such nasenable attoneys- fees as shall to Awarded by the Court. IN WITNESS IO(ERE07, the Parties hereto have eAacuted this Ag"~t CA the day and year first lbw@ written. U Illy1 CMIR: CITY Of RANCND CIKAM SA, CAtifom'A. a aunicipai 1 Q>Qr corporation Calm A Attaclatef, Inc. 511 ; . Phillip 0. Schist$er ATTEST• •.lGfQ.tertle, _ !t' CHH-iernanks prepertlH ` Laurie N. U&SIt'.La a. A-• v MY Cleft . L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA gar STAFF REPORT ?E' D` ow a DATE: February 17, 1582 J $ Z TOe City Council and City Manager 1477 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Release Of Lien Agreement and Acceptance cf Lien Agreement for Joseph and Rebecca Bonneville located at 5844 East Avenue Joseph and Rebecca Bonneville have requested release of the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement accepted by City Council on May 20, 1980 per Resolution No. 80 -53 for refinaacing purposes. A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement submitted • by Joseph and Rebecca Bonneville tc replace the original is attached for City Council approval. RECOLL+tENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. Respectfully itted LBHi. JS s j as IAttachmontn ry . h <. �v i RESOLUTION NO. 2B-3Q • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RM-10 CUCAMONGA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY 14- PROVEilEl1T CONTRACT AND LIEN AGR ;EMENT FRLM JOSEPH N. BONNEVILLE AND REBECCA A BONNEVILLE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -53 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Joseph W. Bonneville and Rebecca A. Bonneville; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in official records of San Bernardino County, California, or June 19, 1980, as Document No. 80- 140107; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Cit; of Rancho Cucamonga, does hereby release said Real Property Irq.,ovement Contract and Lien hgreerent and that Citv Clerk shall cause this Resol•ition to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. P4SSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES NOES: ABSENT Phillip 0. Schlosser-7my—o—r ATTEST: Lauren M. Wassercmn. City Clerk' _1 RESOLUTION 110. 'bj -E$ e A RESGLUTION OF THE CITY COUKCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVENEM CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM JOSEPH W. SONNEVILIE AND REBECCA A. BONNEVILLE AND AUTHORIZING ihE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SISN THE SP^iE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish requirements for landlocked parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and WHEREAS, Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 3213 as per Map reco led in Book 28 of Parcel Maps, Page 77, records of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, is a landlocked Parcel within the meaning of said Resolution No 80 -30; and WHEREAS, Joseph N. Bonneville and Pebecca A. Bonneville has executed a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which Is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same In the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES NOES: ABSENT- Phillip 0. Schlosser.wy—or ATTEST Buren M. Wasserman, L RY Clerk 4 J F �1 i • 24 A St. ICI SUMMIT _ AVE CITY OF RAWf NO 1 AV l.�lI11VIO�l7A TrrL[, ZONMEMILLE LEIN OGQMT. LXIJIB SQ1LE, N.T.S. 0 RCCOROING FJ.COLSTCD BY AND WHIN RCCOROED MAIL TO, CITY CLEW[ CITY OF RANCHO LUCANOWA 9110 -C Use Line Road Post Office Sox 407 RAm" Cueaa049a, California 91714 NOTICE Of RHVAIH OF LIEN Let WrICO be given that the City of Rancho Cucamnga hereby releases its lien WHICH It had caused ra be recorded an the land hereinafter more lullf described, said lion Laing been placed [hare.. by the recording of a coutrect between the City of Rancho Cucamnga and J.sePh M. tbnnevllle and Rebecca A. mansvllle, dated May 10, 1980 and recorded June 19, 1980 as Docwe... —. 80- 140107 Recorded In Official Records, San eesnardloo County. Beau of Calltornla rho description of the land le as follows, Parcel 1 of Parcel Nap 1313 As per Nap recorded in hook 18 of Parcel "Is. Page 77, records of said County (APN 119- 111 -63) STATE OF CAL. cRNIA ) ) as COJNFY OP SAS A6.XARDI00 ) CITY OP RANCHO COCAlWNCA, CALIFORNIA, a amntcipal corporation By PHILLIP 0. SCULDISLI Nnror On , 19 before me, th. ors 9 . a tars Public In and for said State, personally appeared Phillip 0. Schlosser. 4:cWn to a to to the Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. a su:niclpal Corporation that executed the within Instrument, known to < p to be the parson Who executed the Within rnatrunaat. on behalf of said manlcipal Corporation. therein named. and acknowledged to sa that such munlci. Pat Corporation executed the saw wz�rss k sy hond Aid a em tea , S� Notary Public In a ores sate ",i�' 0 ACCORDING RLOMTW BY and MEN RCCORDW MAIL TO) MTy CLEAR Clay OP RANCHO CUCANORW 9120 -C Case Line Road post office 7Wa 607 Raaeho Cucamonga, California !1710 REAL wROREaT, A= Ltr.1 AZPXLMrf THIS ACAC[II[2+T, made and entered into this � day of . 14_, by and bo wssn Joseph R. Comeville And Rebecca A. Bonneville (be^oimafter referred to as 'Developer'). and the CITr OF RANCHO CCCA1t)MU, C IFOXNIA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred W as 'City -). provides as follwn WHER AS, as a general condition precedent to the issuance of a buildlna permit for residential davelopnant, the City regnires the construction Of aissfnq off -site street improvements, imlud {pg Curb, gutter, sidewalk and pavement, adjacent to the property to be de- veloped, And MHCRCAS, the Developer desires to postpone construction Of ouch improvements until a later date, sa determined by the City) and HHCAEM. the City is agr"able to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement requiring the Developer to construct said loprOvments. At nO expense W the City, after demand to do so by the City, which said Agreement shall also provide that the City may construct aid imPcowemmlts if the Developer falls Ot neglects to ao so ind that the City shall have a lion upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer's par - formanca, and any repayment due City MGR. THLREEORE. TBC PARTIES AORCC, 1 The Developer hereby agrees that they .111 install off - vte street Improvements, including curb, qut.•r, sidwalk and pavement, .a accordance and coaplianco with all applicable ordalsnces, resolutions, [alas and cegulattoes of the City In effect At the time Of the lestslla- tion. Said improvements shall ba installed upon and along the westerly rone -half (1/2) Of the eat0aion of net Avenue. adjacent W Developer's � •. property heraiaftar described. n • r_ • e , ar our ,a.. .� n a y.oy. � • • eenu�t . _a ,P.^ ,"J • ate._ .,� a - a.o�� ,a , rare n •_ :uc , _ .a • a .a:. .. paa um . .ta • 9 To the extant required to give affect of this Agraamrt me A eorcgage, the tern •mvelapsx- &hall man •.rtgagar• and the City shall be the •anrtgagee• as thou term are used in the Civil Coda of the State o: California and any other statute perceining W mortgages on real property 9. 1f legal actic• Is coswnced to anforea any of "a provlalons of this Agreemnts to recover any sum Mich the City is entitled to recover from the Ceveloper hereunder Cr to foreclose the right of the De,-eloper to cedes& thO above -0s2arlbed property ftm the wrtgage created Aereby, tbcm the prevailing party shall to entitled to recover its Costs acd such ..&aonable atrarasys' fees m shat. be awarded by the Lour. IS RIT8Ca9 W"RMF the parties hereto have executed this Agre.ment on the day and ye r first above urltten. :.�:' OCVfIAICR. CITE OI 1 %Tffo NC&Ackak, iv/u fir% t CA IIOMIA, a mnleiped corporation By. GCw D I4LIP 0. SC 5 Mayan A9 M 1 '1. Fxcw_ City Clark rtFrz a twlaomta t e. Ica. 1. 9I e: .— +, ..pa.l.ttsr N.eemlr Webs ts�t J h R 1IIr d nab F. C< III g r.w. �ns�.rl.IwNae� ten 'mod r r on.tut nu XZI 1', /ea .e. LLOlA7lTLt r . j aTn • t•13� T:uo-'i i• �� v 1 1lml dk., L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 GL TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Lloyd B. Hubba, City Engineer By: Barbara Rrall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Acceptance ^f Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Donald and Tracy Glover for 7954 Etiwanda Avenue As a prerequisite to issuance of a building permit for landlocked parcels as estdblished in Resolution No. 80 -38, an offer to dedi- cate that portion of a future street adjacent to 7954 Etivaada Avenue and a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for further construction is required. Hr and Mrs. Glover have executed a document for the offer of dedication and the attached lion agreement to provide required street improvements at some future date and have submitted the lien agreement for City Council approval. RECOW:ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolu- tion and authorize the Mayor and City Clark to sign and accept said line agreement. Respectfully tted, L Lax:nx :jaa Attachmer.t V 3 -1 , y • RESOI UT10N 110. Q 9 !q A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPEkTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM DONALD GLOVER AND TRACY GLOVER AND AUTHORi7ING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SiGN THE SAME. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 80 -38 on May 7, 1980, to establish reQuiremnts for landlocked parcels where no subdivision is occurring; and WHEREAS, the real described property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga to wit: The south 18S feet of the east 103 feet of the west 298 feet of the north 1/2 of Lot 9, Block 'x' according to the Preliminary Map of Etiwanda Colony Lands, as per Plat recorded to Book 2 of Maps. Page 24, Records of said County, (APN 227 - 221 -23) is a landlocked Parcel; and WHEREAS, Donald J. Glove: and Tracy L. Glover have executed • a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, a copy of which Is attached hereto and Incorporated heroin by reference. NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the f4ty Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San 3ornardino County, California PASSED, APPROVED and AD07TE0 this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES: HOES: ABSENT ATTEST Lauren I. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip 0 Se osser, iyor b e� a, i 1.14 AC sir . W 2 :z at 4. 34 Ac 0 _11 1ziAC WIZ AX. •:a �? �1 6 • a eL�' -- --- — is 2'11 nnvt2A © L3 Ac V• 188 A1' 0 X1100 --- ------- 3_ I GLL s Ci 9 24 Ac J 5 Act I 79S-h Eil WA N DA AVENUE_ titt�; �.;�. CITY RANCHO cUcu�toNc,� - cc "y{w! 3 ENGINEERING DIVISION N VICINITY NIAP } 0 RECORDING RL17 EEO By and Wahl RECORDED RAIL TO, CITY CLERK CITY OF MKIN) COCMICRGA 9310 -C Lane Line Road post Office box 907 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 RzhL P"Prm Iliymo rmr ccxrrn r ARD LILII ADAry Rewr 7934 Ztivanda Avenw THIS AGRCEIQNT, made and entered loco this _ day of . 19 —. by and Ratan Donald J Glover and Tracy L. Glornv, Buabend and Nlfe an Joint Tanante, thereinafter referred to ail 'Developer'), and tie CITY Or MNCRO CDCAMMIt A. CALIICRNIA. • municipal corporation (hae3aftrt referred to as -City-). provides as follows, MEREA9, a• a general condition precedent to the lssusnte of a buildi,v permit for residential development, the City requires the construction of missing off -sita street Improvements. Including curb.• gutter, sidevalk and pavemento adjacent to the property to be developed, and YRERUBs the Developer desires to postpone construction of such improvements unetl a later date, as determined by the Cltyt and MUM the City is agreeable to such postponement provided that the Developer enters into this Agreement lequlring the Developer te construct said irprovelanta, at no expense to the City, after demand to do so by the Clty, which said Agreement shall also provide that to City may construct said improvements If the Developer falls or roglaccs to do so and that the City shall Kure a lisp upon the real property hereinafter described as security for the Developer'• perfor- ance. and Any repayment due City. NON. THr [FORE. TUC PARTRE3 Ati 1. The Develops[ hereby agrees that they vlll install off - site etreat loprovenits, including cdrb, gutter. sidmlk and rP rnt. t In accordance and eo..plisae vlth all applicable erdlanea. t ens. rules and regulations of the City In effort at the ties of the All n- 4 tion. Said lmproveeents shall be Insv Iled upon and along " to strut adjacent to Cavelope04 property herein /ter deserU The south 115 last of the east 103 feet of the vest 252 feet of the north 1/2 Of lot e, Stock •I• according to the Preliminary Nap of ltlucda Colony Landes as per Plat recorded in Book 2 of Maps, page 2e, Mtrords of said County. (APB 227 - 211 -23) S. This conveyance In In trust, &w we. for then purposes described above. — I. the installation OL said laprovsrnt, shall W cesplwed rot later then one (1) year following witt,a notice to the Developer free the City to omance installation of the save. installation of said Lsprovaante shall be at an expense to the Cl.y. 3. in the want the DwQeper falls or refuses W eamlete the installation of mid impmwanents in a efml) mnner, City say at any tlm thereafter, upon giving the Developer wittan notice of Its intention W do go, enter upon the property hereinafter derrribed and posplets said isprovemnt, and reco w all oat, of ccepletion Incurred • by tht City floe the Developer. C, e. To mature the pe[formacs by the Developer at the terse r,� and .endetiom of this Agreemat and t, eseve, the repsyxnt to City r of any funds which my be expended by City in oxplating sold improve- mats upon default by the Developer hereunder, the pa"IvVer does by thus prauats grant, bargain, sell and MOM to the City the following described real property situated in the City of wash^ Cucanotga, . County of San Bernardino, State of California. to- it: The south 115 last of the east 103 feet of the vest 252 feet of the north 1/2 Of lot e, Stock •I• according to the Preliminary Nap of ltlucda Colony Landes as per Plat recorded in Book 2 of Maps, page 2e, Mtrords of said County. (APB 227 - 211 -23) S. This conveyance In In trust, &w we. for then purposes described above. — a. Ow, therefore, if the Dmwloper shall faithfully perform all at the &eta and thing. by ttm to be dam under this Agraemnt, then this omayance shall on voids otherwise. is shall ramie In lull Lore and offset and in all respect, shall be considered and treated as a wrtgage on tha real property and the rights and ebllgatloes of the parties with respect thereto shall be gwsrned by the provisions of the Civil Code of the State of Callfornla, led any other applicable statute, pertaining to mrtgageo an real property. 7. This Agremont shalt be bending upon and shall Insure • m the benefit of the Mira, executors, adaintatraWes, succasaors and C, assigns of e.ah of the parties hereto. r,� 67 r 0 S To the extent rpulrs] in glue eflsnt of this Agreanut •• a mortgage, the tees 'Developer' sball ran 'mortgage-' and the City shall be the 'mortgagee' a thou bras are Seed In the Civil Code of the State of California and any other statute PartalnlAV W mortgages on rut property. S. If legal action Is commenced to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreeaant. to roarer any sum which the City Is entitled b recover frog tbo cevnlopar hereunder or to foreclose the right of the Devaloper W radeu the above- dee:rlbd property fros the mortgage created hereby. then Me prevailing party $ell be entitled W recover Its costa and even ressaubl• attorneys' fees as shall be awarded by the Court. IR 17THM WHERMY, the Parties henb here aseauted this Agreement o � the day and year first above written. CLTrt DEVELOPER, CITY Or mmo CCCRYORDA, t� `L� • Ioratio. • sunlclyal corporation morparat A. ���_�•. ' P BY, —111ILLIF D. Smossu Myer ' — QUf¢W77 I niiJj — city Clerk 9 /O l/ 0 ILSOLOWN W. 8I -10d A AOOIDfiON OF SR CIft CD=L 07 = an Or Y OOtJJtWJ. CASfOOtA. 0131ttAfnO =A= an no%== to @Ota an om- UaCtf AND All. rt11W7 AND SWMQ1R Nc0 tafum to tRRn symm it hew[ to oNlwn M. N tM foamin city eyle /ws srs dulsaiud u mt.. city erdls ". L an /rtaty sel secm4r7 Mu nfsned m rDe , OA" Ur d.. 0e lty tads Ulreeeautlee Jerp Ornt. Nefldlq Offlclsl itch"d r.OYr, city rls liuleel Vdrle. s"ler rt-- -r NtsdrA N ". te. , ucr . telr.rrer. ?Ltlm. AfnOrm. AM 0=0 t!L 17di dry of TOM,?. I983. Ant. Ncla: Mtn: iut rr1Z 0: teue.s.r. W" AttOT: 6 I � f �^ z • fCCIORDD fo. fl.iSL -A A =O=W W TIM CM CGCtCIL Of In CM T lVCW cvcAlma". OUTDOU. fAllilta TOM lal. CDW D CLUNG WATIAI lD .0110! I- =CS "A Ctq Do.mll of ttw Ctp of Uotl. Clac000tmo CALlf.rata. Aa. r.tviw u toll.. I. ata.r to u.)1, "a to t.a.tr..eu of tM s®letpal sell .lalom wT% of 0. Coaq et ao a ... .tdtoo. 1, u OKN'Jr7 u sao. Weals faletthsts u tlos. pK.00. mtporlsal to afy tart C.ca.atA al V"l,w at p jf of th. City .f &"ch. O.cs.at{A. T ®AVt. t!r f.11..lol s.../ 1.UrLdmala .. aotb.rtaw to .ip all aKK.an taut loer.0 "Loan u t"j"Is atctaw.. S.Mrs D. lack.., Watwu Lt.. tosp.cou lar, A. fops O.ck T,plet Sol" J. ft . .11ssac0 DIT"Or ,All=. APMVD. sad AWfItD W. 17th Aa, +t labtvq. 107. AM. YDC1, ANDr. ukktp�,t, Mn,r At=, Win. vu..eta. un c1.rk 8 Lj ORDINANCE NO. I6Ai Ail ORCINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHMIGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUHSEk 201- 25,*-23, 25 6 26 FROM R- 1- IO,OCO TO R- 2 /PLAIINE0 DEVELOPMENT FOR 9.75 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEA4T CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND HIGHLAIP) The tit) Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: following: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a public hearing held to the time and manner prescribed by law, considarcd rezoning of the property hereinafter described. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the c ty of Rancho Cucamonga. C This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed - • herein i SECTION 2: The following described real property 1s hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby dmended g accordingly Assessor's Parcel Number 201 - 252 -23, 25 b 26 from P -1- 10,(100 (Sin le- Family on 10,000 square foot lots) to R- 2 /P.D. Two _Eami.4, /Planned Development) generally located on the nort east tuner of Archibald and Highland. Clerk sha1SE ause t &hall sign this withiOrdinance ifteen (15) days after its passage at least once to The Da 11 R� art, a newspaper of general circulation published in the Ly o ca o. California, and — - circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 6th -day of Janua.y, -4982. APES: NOES ABSENT ORDINANCE NO. 1t5 ••� AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL MMER 201- 252 -32 FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R -2 1P D. FOR 5.85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND. EAST OF ARCHIBALD The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. does ordain as follows: following: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the A. That the Planning Coamtssion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, considered rezoning of the property hereinafter described. 8 That this rezoning is consistent with the Genr.ral Plan of the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have to significant environmental impact as provided in V%e Negative Declaration filed herein. • rezoned SECTIOh 2: staated.la following znni 9 car IsphrreLyyamerhereby accordingly Parce' Umber 2 from Single- Family o- IO.DOD sgLare footlots)- toIR-2%P.D. (Tro Far.ily /Planned Development) generally located on the nsrth side of Highland, east of Archibald Clerk shaIT cause 36e ameMtoobespublished withinrfifteen (15) dars City after its passage at least once in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in th—e-M—y-67 urtarto, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal ' fornia. — PA'.SED. APPPOVED, and ADOPTED this 6th dn; of January. 1982 1. ES: UO ES ABSENT: I` /A ri 0 LI M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbe, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougaau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Revision to Title 10, Vehicles 6 Traffic, of the Municipal Code Regarding the Speed Limit on Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Haven Avenue At the Council's last meeting, a number of speed zone revisions were proposed during first reading of a recommended amendment to Title 10. At that time, a recommendation was not made re- garding the speed limit on Base Line Road pending the results of a comprehensive study of the street. This overall study was undertaken as a joint effort of the Sheriff's snd Engineering Departments in response to the concerns of a number of citizens as expressed in a recent petition. The study has been completed and the results discussed by the Traffic Committee at its February 9 meeting. The Committee con - sldered the following information: Chan es since revioua a eed limit was established. lanes Niie Avenue, ardistanceoof 1x1/2 miles. This is over one -half the length of the 35 MPH zone. As a result of the widening, 4800 feet (.9 mile) Of continuous left turn lane was also installed. Stop signs wore removed and traffic signals installea at two locations - Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue. Accident History. Accident patterns along Base Line show that conditions could be improved at several points, but the overall accident rate is below that which would be expected for urban four lane streets. Speed Survey. A 'traffic and engineering survey consists of the above Stems plus a determination of prevailing 3pOeds. The prevailing speed �3 v CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Revision to Title 10, Vehicles and Traffic, of the Hunicipal Code Regarding the Speed Limit on Base Line Road from Carnelian Street to Eleven Avenue February 17, 1982 Page 2 • (the •critical" speed as explained lakt meeting) on Base Llne is as follows: Upland City Limit to Carnelian Street 50 MPH Carnelian Street to Haven Avenue 42 to 48 MPH In the latter case the higher speeds occur between Carnelian and Lion Streets. Committee Recommendation. The :ommittee recognized that the physical improvements to Base Line have greatly increased its efficiency and safety. There should be attention directed to signal detector improvements at Carnelian Streett driveway access could be improved at the high school; left turn lanes should be installed from Amethyst to Archibald but under present circumstances, must wait for more widening, a traffic signal would be desirable at Beryl Street, and a speed limit more in keeping with prevailing speeds should be instituted. The Committee noted that the operation and safety of the street would be enhanced by the latter measure as a more reasonable limit would be adhered to by more drivers, giving greater uniformity to traffic movement. RECOMMENDATION The Council is asked this evening to approve two measures (1) set a 40 MPH speed limit on Base Line from Carnelian to Turner and 45 MPH from Turner to Haven and (2) raise the priority of the traffic signal at Beryl Street to third in status, behind that of the signals at Archibald Avenue /4th Street and Carnelian Street/ Lemon Avenue. Both of these actions would be appropriate rneponses to the concerns of the citizens who raised questions regarding the operation of Rase Line in the Garnet -beryl -Lion Street area and to the needs of enforcement personnel, who now have no means of curtailing the true "speeders•. Re G pe fully submi tcd, Q� 0 — L4R :PA�a n Attachment L 1] i ORDINANCE NO. 169 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOUGA, CALIFORNIA, !WENDING SECTIONS 10.04.070, 10.04.100, 10.20.010, 10.20.020, 10.40.010 A & B. 10.52.030, 10.52.040, 10.56.020, OF TITLE 30, VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC The city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 10.04.070, 10.04.100, 10.20,010, 10.20.040 10.40.010 A 6 10.10,o0,t Ib- 526d61- 1b3b -0 0 0 one o ucamon a un a awe are ere amended to read as follows: s: 10.04.070 Holidays. Within the meaning of this chapter, "holidays" are t 'e rst day of January, known as *New Year's Day"; the third Monday to February, known as "Washington's Birthday "; the last Monday in May, known as "Memorial Day% the f,,.rth day of July, known as "Independcnce Day "; the first Monday in September, known as "Labor Day "; the Barth Monday in October, known as "Veterans Day% the last Thursday In hovember, known as 'Thanksgiving Day "; and the twenty -fifth day of Docenter, known as "Christmas nay% In the event "New Year's Day% "Indepeidence Day" and `Christmas Day" falls on Sunday, the following day will be taken in lieu of the holiday, and if they fall on Saturday, tie Friday preceding wi11 be deemed a holiday. 10.04.100 Ordinance, " 0rdinance" means the ordinance, rule or regulat on a opte y e iV Council relating to the movement of traffic and enforcement thereof. 10.04.010 City traffic engineer to establish crosswalks. A. The city traffic engineer as authorized 5y the City Council shall establish, designate and maintain crosswalks at intersections end other places by appropriate devices, marks or lines upon the surface of the roadway where in his opinion there is particu- lar danger to pedestriins crossing tha roadway. B. The city traffic engineer as authorized by the City Council may install signs at or adjacent to an inter- section in respect to any crosswalk directing that pedestrians shall not cross in the crosswalk so indicated. 10.52.030 Parkin s ace m rktn s. The city traffic engineer Is authorized y t e u ount to nsta and maintain parking space markings to indicate parking spaces for on -street and off - street parking. ,6 Ordinance No. 169 Page 2 10.52.040 Sienz or marklnas lndicatinm angle oarkina. • A. The city traffic engineer as authorized by the City Council s determine e geckrallbepermit d andshall ma or sinsuhsteets but such angle parking sWl not be indicated upon federal aid or the state hlgWay within the city unies^ ••e Department of Transportation has determined the N dway is not of sufficient width to penal[ angle parking without interfering with the free movement of traffic. B. Angle parking shall not be indicated or Permitted at ally place where traffic would be caused or redu red to drive upon the left side of the street. 10.56.020 Truck restrfctions. The city traffic engineer is authorize y ty unc on a oas s of an engineering and traffic survey, to erect and maintain official traffic control devices on any streets or parts of streets to prohibit the operation 3f trucks exceeding the limit of pounds gross weight as prescribed by the Vehicle Code, Provided that such devices shall not prohibit necessary local operation on such streets for the purpose of making a pick up or delivery. Is de termine .. - -- . c' 1L.L 'n c ream zones. It y city Council reso uz on an upon e s s Of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law upon the following streets is less than is necessary fur safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the designation and signposting of the streets as through highways and (or) by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is etclared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets decignated in this -t on when signs are erected giving nutice Hereof: 7� Name of Street ,,. Portion Affected Geclared Priza Fecie Speed Ifmit (nph) I Amethyst Street - -Base Line to end 35 2. Beryl Street - -Base Line to 800' 3 north of Lemon Avenue Ninth Street —Grove to Bake;- 40 4 Hellman Avenue - -Al•a Loma Drive to 5. 500' north of Hanzanfta Drive Arrow !route- -Gn+ve to Istker 35 6. Sapphire Street- •Lemon to BAyan 45 40 7. Vineyard Avenue -- Carnelian to Church 40 7� Ordinance No. 169 Page 3 SECTION 2: The Hsyor shall sign this Ord -once and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after Its passage at least onat in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in the TIty of URtario. California, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , i982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: - �2 7 :':? 10.20.020 Decrees- of state law maximums eed. It 1s detemined %y City Council resolution an upon the s s e an eng veering and traffic investigation that 44 speed permitted by state law is greater than is reasonable or safe the conditions found to mist upon such streets, and it is declared tn,.- the prim facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on these streets or part; of streets designated In this section when signs are erected giving notice thereof: Name of Street or Declared Prima Facie Portion Affected Speed Limit (mph) 1 Archibald Avenue-- Fou�.n Street to Banyan Street 45 2. Arrow Route - -Raker to Haven 45 3. Haven Avenue-- Mghland to Nilson 50 4. Hellman Avenue -- Foothill to Alta Lama Dr. 35 S. Hellman Avenue - -Gth to Foothill 45 6. Hellman Avemte- -5001 nnrth of Manzdnita to Valley View 40 7. Beryl Street -8001 north of Lemon tr Banyan 40 8. Bar,- Street -- Banyan to end 45 9. Base Line Road- -West City Limit to Carnellan 45 10. Base Line Road -- Carnelian to Turner 35 11 Base Line Road- -Turner to Haven 45 12. Carnelian Street — Foothill to end 45 • 13. Eighth Street - -Grove to haven 45 14 Etiwanda Avenue -- Foothill to Highland 45 15 Highland Avenue - :amethyst to Archibald 35 16. Grove Avenue -- Eighth to Foothill 40 17. Turner Avenue-- Eighth to Foothill 45 18. Sapphire Street - -19th to Lemon 40 19. Smpphire Street -- Banyan to end 45 20 Vineyard Avenite- -Church to Base line 40 21 Knittram Avenue- Ettwanda to East City Limit 40 SECTION 2: The Hsyor shall sign this Ord -once and the City Clerk shall cause the same to he published within fifteen (15) days after Its passage at least onat in The Daily Report. a newspaper of general circulation published in the TIty of URtario. California, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , i982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: - �2 7 :':? • ORDINANCE NO. II Ali ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE Y,EED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ESTABLISHING SUCH AN AUTHORITY needs and requires neweSmethods Rancho Cucamonga tays required to to acquire, construct or rehablei• ate facilities +hich will increase e=Ployment opportunities or othenrise contribute to economic development in the City; and I1hEREAS, the California Industrial Oeielopment Financing Act, being Title IO of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 91500 (the •Act°), provides an alternate sethod of financing to mromote and enhance economic development and to increase opportunities f useful employment by establishing an Ind, al development authority of the City (the °Authority); and WHEREAS, the Act provides that the Authority is to facilitate, for and on behalf of private enterprise, the acquisition of property for Purposes as set forth in the Act through the issuance of revenue bends, • a'l under and in accordance with provisions of the Act; and WHEREAS. Section 91503 of the Act provides that 0e activities or uses for which property acluired pursuant tG provisions of the Act shall be suitable are industrial uses including, without limitation, assembling, fabricating, marufuct.rring, or processing activities, with respect to any products of agriculture, forestry, mining or manufacture; and WHEREAS, Section 91520(a) of the Act provides that the sole purpose of the Authority is to undertake projects through the issuance of bonds and accomplishment of the purposes provided in the Act and to carry out arA complete such projects and eeeferm and exercise derivative obligaticas and powers; and exercise any powerstunder Is not ranee,, business declares that there is a need for the Authority and thai the Authority sha'1 function and that such ordinance shall be subJw to referendum in the manner prescribed by law for ordinances of the City; aid WHEREAS, the City desires to establish Oa Authority for the purposes set forth in the Act 0 Ordinance No. 1,7 Page 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM9NGA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. Findings. The :ity Council hereby finds and declares ati t there exists In the Cit> a reed to assist Industry to the financing of capital outlays required ,n acquire, construct or r;;habilitate facilities in order to increase employment opportunities and to contribute to economic development in the City SECTION 2. Need for an Authority: The City Council further finds and ec� at e tJwt t ere is a nee cr an industrial development authority of the City in order to assist Ir providing industry to the City % th an alternative method of financini in acquiring, constructing or rehabilitating facilities !it accordance with provi..ons of the Art. SECTION 3 Ettablislunent of Authority The industrial development authority o e ity esublis L-1 yy the Act is hereby declared organized under the race of *Industrial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cucamonga" and shall function under and in accordance with provisions of the Act. SECTION a. Construction. 'rite orovis,sns of this Ordinance, being necessary theare T the City and its inhabit :nts, shall be liberally construed to effect its purposes SECTION S. Environmental Determination: The City Council finds that aaTop -tfon of s Ordinance and UTe creation of the `Industrial Development Authority of the City of Rancho Cucamonga' will net cause any significant adverse impacts upon the environment and therefore recomcends issuance of a Negative Declaration SECTION 6. Notice and Effective Ddte: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance an theZ ty Clerk shall cause a same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published to the zity cr- ntar o, California, and circulated ii the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTID this 3rd day of February, 1982. AYES HOES ABSENT ATTEST: AT Up D. Schlosser, yor 0 0 Lauren n H. a seraan, Y tarr- ' iii • RESOLUTION NO 8 Q - Z • A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C174 OF RANCHO CUCAHOHGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-01, ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE oROCE °SING OF AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELf'PMENT BOND APPLICATION WHEREAS, City Council held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider the establishment of an industrial Bond Authority; and WHEREAS, the City Council does wish to act as the Industrial Development Authority; and WHEREAS, certain administrative costs will be incurred by the City when prccessing any Industrial Development Revenue Bond requests for consideration NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT (ESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga amends the comprehensive fee schedule, Resolution No 79 -01 as follows 6 4 F;;e for Industrial Develo nt Bond A ti cation: A fee in amount 1/4 of o e esta. s e max anaa amount o the proposed bond application and not less than $1,250. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1982. AYES NOES ABSENT ATTEST: Lauren It. Wasserman, City Clerk Phillip U. Schlosser-7lUy—or RJ 0 RESOLUTION HO. 8 0-Zio A RESOLUTIDii OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA11ONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE CITY COUNCIL AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPHENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has found a need exists to helo firamce Capital Outlays, to assist industrial development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a need for an Industrial Development Authority in the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the Industrial Development Authority of the City shall be organized as set forth to the Industrial Development Financing Act being titled i0 of the government code of the State of California, commencing with Sect!on 91SOO. NOW, ThEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the Ci;v of Rancho Cucamonga shall function as the Board of Directors of the industrial Dev- lopment Authority under and in accordance with the provisions of the Indnstrial Development Act. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 3rd day of February, 1962. • AYES: NOES: ABSENT- PMTTTo U.790oser, -Fay®r ATTEST Lauren M. Wa—ss—e—rm—a-n—,-U—ty-ZT-e—rV M i ■ • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 aL TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: loyd A. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT. ..ppro"I of Victoria Planned Community Master Plan of Dra Wage Attached for Council approval is a resolution adopting the Master Plan of Drainage for Victoria. This plan was reviawed at your special drainage meetinq o= December 3, 1981. This plan has under- gone minor modificati3ns involving replacement of an open channel with a conduit and provision of additional minor drains. The plan received environmental review as a part of the Planned Community and is now ready for adoption. It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached resolution adopting the Victoria Planned Community Drainage Plan as a portion of the City Master Plan of rsninage. Respectfully 9, ttttted�, LBH 0as Attachmentb ■ ,I 3 I 0 RESOLUTION NO. S.a . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMUINITY DRAINAGE PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California has reviewed the proposed Master Plan of Drainage fur the Victoria Planned Co=unity; and JHEREAS, said Master Plan of Drainage has been found by the Planning Commission of the City o' Rancho Cucamonga to be consistent with the City General Plan; and WHEEREAS, the Planning Cmoission has recommended adoption of said Drainage Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE *T RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopts the Master Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Planned Community as shown on the attached Exhibits 'A" and '8' and approves all accompanying profiles end cost estimates accompanying said Plan BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Master Plan of Drainage for Victoria Planned Crmmunity shall replace conflicting drains included in the current adopted plan PASSED, APPROVEO, and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982 AYES: NOES ASSENT: Phillip 0. Schlosser. Ibyor ATTEST: auren , assenwn. City C.e—r r i' J t 0 J 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1982 TO Planning Cacmission FROM- Lloyd B Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT Paster Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Development ABSTRACT: TOis report presents the Master �l n of Drainage :or the Victoria eNeTo—pinenc to the Planning Coumission for review and reromtendation to the roury ii for adoption and certification BACKGROUND: The full drainage master plan includes three areas of the City: t;e —rs element covered under contract to L. D. King incli.ded the areas west of Deer Creek plus the industrial area south of Foothill Boulevard, west of Day Creek; the remaining two elements are the drainage plans for the Victoria and Terra vista Planned Cocmunities. These three areas as shown in Figure C encompass the bulk of the City exlusive of the Ettwarda specific Plan area. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Victoria Development encompasies an area of about 2,100 acres o an n t City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is divided into two basic sections One being the area east of Day Creek (referred to as the eastern sec- tion) and the other, the area west of Day Creek (ref:rred to as the western sec- tion) The easttrn section is bounded by Etiwarvla Aven•.e on the on the east, Day Creek on tie west, Highland A -enue on the north. and the Devore Freeway an the south T:ie western section is bounded by Deer Creec on the west, Day Creek on the east, Highland Avenue on the ncrth, and Base Line Road on the south. The entire eastern section including its tributary drainage areas will discharge its flow into Day Creek in the ultimate scheme of the Project. The =jor portion of tie western section which is be:waen Milliken Avenue and Day Creek, including the northerly tributary drainage areas will discharge its flow into Day Creek, while the miner portion of this section, which is between Milliken Avenue and Deer Creek including its northerly tributary drainage areas, will discharge its flow into Deer Creek. The Deer Creek system is currently undergoing federally funted improvements designed and coordinated by the U. S Army Corps of Engineers. The improved facility from Deer Creek spreading grounds to Haven Avenue is expected to be completed by December 1982 An overall comprehensive study for the Day Creek system is currently underway by the surrounding cities, counties, private land owners, and private consulting engineering firms. It s therefore anticipated that there will be future improvements to the Day Cr2ck spreading grounds to enable it to store a signifi- cant volume of storm, runoff for water conservation purposes, and that there will also be future lmprovemerts to the Day Creek channel itself to allow for more at Planning CO mission Staff Report Master Plan of Drainage for victoria Development January 13. 19E2 Page 2 capacity in the event of major storms The tributary drainage north of Highland Avenue (see Exhibit 0) in an undeveloped or natural state will be collected In graded earth ditches on the north side of Highland Avenue and carried to points of discharge as shown on Exhibit A. The enough to accept rae25i year estorm y (area ofullyndeveloped) ors at100tyearsstorml (area undeveloped) whichever is greater. The basic criteria of design of the streets and storm drain system for this project will be as follows. I. Minimum rate of grade for all streets will be 0.55. 2. The c mbinatlon of storm drain and streets shall be designed to carry a 25 3. year treets skill Also be designed to carry RM at which point it will be picked up byla0storm drain system RM to 4. All storm drain systems with the exception of Line •I' (See Exhibit A) will be sized for a 25 year storm with the residual of a 1CO year storm being handled in the street system until it reaches a point of pickup by a storm drain system. 5 witr provisions or a secondary outfall route. However, In catch basins w sSsituatiansrhere secondary outfall is extremely difficult without costly hinderance to the • development, no secondary route will be required provided the catch basins and storm drains attributed to the particular sump condition are sized bash on a 100 yeas storm. C011CLUSION: It is the city Engineer's finding that the Victoria Master Plan of itaiis consistent withethe Rancho CucamongacMaster Plan OfrStormrDrains ofdwhich it is to be d part. The plan is also consistent with the victoria Con nity Plan and the recommendations set forth in its Enviriroental Impact Report. REC"'EHDATIOH: It is recommended that the Planning Coemission consider approval Of the attar ed It recoending review and adoption of the Master Plan by the City council ma Res ectfully SuW tted. LDH:j Attachments 65 Ll RESOLUTION NO. 82 -12 i 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REC0,HMENDiNG PUBLIC REVIEW AND ADOPTION OF THE MASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE FOR THE VICTORIA DEVELOPMENT has duly considdered Cemmisstcn Of the Plan Ranch theeamonga Victoria Development; and has been four.J to�be cu istentlwithftheaGeneraloPlin ofttherCity oflRannccho nt Cucamonga THEREFORE. Oa acsc of City of Ran hCucami.ga recomsendsthatthe City Council the Public review and adoption of the ilaster Plan of Drainage for the Victoria Developme ^t as being a significant element of the City's Com- prehensive Drayage Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLAMBIING CG`Po1SSll`9 OF THE f.ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOR:A 1. JACK LAM, Secretary of the Pldnning Cormission of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoluti3n was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of — - the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit j AYES CWtiISSIONERS King, Rempel, Sceranka, Tolstoy NOES: C0I1MISSIONERS Dahl 4 "r. ABSENT* COMMISSIONERS None 1 96G a i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT k i o�DATE: February 17, 1982 0 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager PRAM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer ` SUBJECT: Approval of Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision #1 Attached for Council approval is a resolution adapeing Comprehensive Sto. — Drain Revision #1 and certifying the Environmental Impact Re- port. VLz plan proposed for adoption was reviewed at the Council's December 3, 1391 Drainage workshop. The plan has been reviewed by the Planning Commission stud found to conform to the General Plan and received a reeommandatio:t of approval. The plan is attached for your review along with a copy of the Plan- . ning Commission Staff Report suammarizing environmental concerns. The Draft E.I.R. was distributed previously. RECO.%MNDATION • It is recommended that the Council approve the Lttached resolution certifying the E.I.R. and adopting Comprehensive Storm Drzin elan Revision #1. Respectfully submitted, LBU Jaa Attachments RESOLUTION NO 1� • 24 d A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CLWNCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU: WNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EN VIROMIENTAL IMPACT REPORT MD ADOPTING COHPREhtN- SIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO. 1 WHEREAS, the City Couhcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1; and WHEREAS, the adoption of said revision requires an Environmental Assessment; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed said Environmental Impact Report and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission on Jam ary 13, 1982 adopted Resolution No. 82 -10, finding Comprehensive Storm Drafn Plan Revision No 1 con;lstent with the General Plan of Rancho Cucamonga; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga herebl -ttffies tFe Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Comproi,c-sive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Oeterminat onursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho camonga tareby approves and adopts Comprehensive Storm Brain Plan Revision No 1, as shown on the attached 4ap dated February 17, 1982, along ufth rertlnent profiles and cost estimates This adoption shall supersede conflicting portion with the cuirent adopted Plan. PASSED. APPROIED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982. AYES f,IES ABSENT: i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1� STAFF REPORT fO iDATE: January 13. 1982 G TO: Planning CnY:iaoimn � FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer 1977 SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON COMPRF.AMSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION NO. 1 ABSTRACT: This report presents the Draft Eaviro a ntal impact Report on the Comprehensive Stom Drain Plan Revision No. 1 to the Planning Commission for review and recoramdat.am to the City Council for certification. BACKGROUND: En confotnonce with rho California Environmental Qaality Act and State Cold" lines, this document has been prepared to alloy the adoption of Revision No. 1 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Stom Drain Master Plan. L In 1979 the City retained the firm of L. D. Riot' to prepare the mastar plan ramialon. After nearly two years of research, study and review by local agencces, the Flood Concrol District and the City Scum Drain Committee a recommended plan has been proposed for adoption. It is this plan which L the subject of this Environmental Impact Report. Attached to this report is an addendum listing rho agencies that received a copy of the OEIR. In addition, copies of all comments made by the revieving agencies and our Er,insering Staff's responses are included. The Master Plan of Stom Drains is the beginning step in the guidance of atom drain construction in the City. The Plan itself does not construct facilities or directly impact the physical environment. These impacts would occur at the elan a project is implemented. Riether environmental analysis should then be completed. It is during that analysis that the major physical impacts and alterrative should be analyzed. It la the agincering Staff's findings that the OEM on Comprehensive Stom y Drain Plan Revision No. 1 and the atom drain priorities are consistent with the City's General Plan and therefore reeommend adoption of the plan. RECO.`DE&DAT10N: It is recommended that the Planning Commission Consider approval of the attached Resolution receemanding eamplacion of public revtov, certification and adoption of the Environmental Impact Report to the City Council. t; Respectfully Submitted, LBH:bc Attachments {S ITEM P ;r. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -10 R RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCt:4ISS10N dF THE CITY OF PAACHO CICAMONGA, RECOHMENDIru PUBLIC REVIEW, CERTIFICATION AND ADOPfION OF 1HE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ' IMPACT REPORT FOR THE COMPREHFNSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION N0. 1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has d,: i � conr'dered and reviewed the Draft EnvirorL*ntal Impact Report for the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1; and WHEREAS, the i aft Environmental Impact Report has been pre - of197Unasoame amended 1potentiaEnvironmental ionmeasurr Act d possible alternatives that might be caused or fow-d necessary in the adoption of Revision No. 1 to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning :.=Ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends riat the City Council congilete the public review, certification, and adeption of the Environmental Impact Report prepared for %he Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No : as being an adequate review of Potential environmental impacts including potential mitigation measure- and all alternatives where necessary BE 17 . FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds comprehensive Storm Drain Flan consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and recommends to the City Ccuncil adoption of Comprehensive Storm Drain Revision No. 1. APPROVED Ant? ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE Cl /yry' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA / . �7' BY: 9 ninon 2 I I, JACK IAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of January, 1982, by the follcwing vote - t0 -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: Rempel, Dahl, Sreranka, Tolstoy, King NOES: C"ISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COiMISSIONERS None 1� 1 n .y ADDENDUM -0 THE ]RAFT ENVIRO.`MNTAL IMPACT REPORT 7 FOR IRE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMDNOA C01@RENENSIVE STORM DRAIM PLAN REVISION /I CON=, I' VELOPMENT DEPARTMENT y ENGINEERING DIVISION RASCP.O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA t I. ACErCIES RECEIVING DRAFT DOCCv.EMTS The following agencies received Draft EOviranmtntal Impact Reports. :Lose preceded by or asterisk made coamenta on the 3taft document. Coplaa of all comments racaived vith responses are included in the next section. *Is The hetropolitan Water District of Southarm California 2. Fuothill Fire Protection District el Chino Basin Municipal Water District i. Chino Boole Water Conservation District a5. California Regional Water Quality Canted Huard - Santa Ana Region 6. City of Fontana a7. C!ty of Ontario 8 City of Upload 9 Southern Celifarmis Association of Covenuents 10 San Bermardtno County Flood Control District 11 Sa Bernardino County Ervironmental Impact Agency 12. Building Industry Association 11 San Bernardino County AssaciatIcn of Coverncent a15 Ca.Irans District p0R •15 State C /earinhhouse e16. Department of Water Resources II. RESPONSES TO CONME7IS RECEIVED 0 A. CalTrans District 108 Coeaents Su—aryt CalTreas District 008 convents address the potential impact of the prppusad store drain lines with respect to such Mena as, 1) !;tat* Route 30 (Foothill Ftreevsy) Right- of -vey. 2) Line encasement. 3) Right-of -way encroachment permits. 0) Storm drain maintenance responsibility within State Highway Right -of -Way. Response: The City of Rancho Cpgamonga will establish early and continuous liaison vith Ca'Zrans upon cO="cement of proposed constm,ction plans as they affec, line anuseaant, encroachment, lines • running parallel to and traversing State gouts 30 (Foothill Free- way). State highway rights -of -way, or any proposed improvements thereto. Responsibility for maintenance of &torn drain lines within State highway rights-of-way vCI also be addressed at that time. • l� B. Chino Basin Municipal Water District Comments Summary, Chino Basin Municipal Water District comments regarded the potontisl impact of the atom drain lines upon their Non - reclaimable Waste Collection System and Domestic Waste Interceptor Lines. The District requests that the agency responsible for implementation of the proposed storm drain lines alto be responsible for the protection and /or relocation of affected faci,Ities. I � a Responset The City of Rancho Cucamonga in reviewing all preliminary and final construction plans for acorn drain facility installations will request a review of the same by affected agencies or utilities, and, thereupon will address responsibility for pro- tection and /or relocation of Affected facilities. C. The Metmnolitan Water District of Southern California Comments Summary: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California request that any development that could affect the District's facilities end its fee property and easements be brought to their attention prior to cocencing construction. Response: Refer to B. Above. 0, California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Region Comments Summaryt The California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Santa Ana Regions bas requested that a draft of the proposed plan to maxiaize the ground- water recharge potential, as referred to on page 36 of the DEIR, be submitted to their office. Response: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is continuing to study the maximizing of groundwater recharge potential utilizing retention facilities existing or proposed within and to the north of the City. Upon completion, a .r • draft of the proposad plan to maximizo the groundwater recharge will . be mnde available to af:seted agencies. X. Departmenr of Water Resources Co:ments Sla aryr The Department of Water Resources recommends that the following areas should be coneidered in the preparation of the DRIR. 1 Non- structural alternatives for the store drain plan. I. Any Impact to fish and wildlife habitat originated by this project. 1. Any impact tr groundwater. such as percolation rate, quantity. and quality. Response, Acaau within the now existant Rancho Cucamonga City Limits have in to-ant years been declared "in u state of emergency" as a result of flood disasters. "Non- s- ructural" drain facilities such as creeks and ravines within City Limits have been investigated and found to be Inadequate; therefore, designs to channelize the acme have been implemented. Rajor creaks such as Cucamonga, Dner, and Demens Creeks have /or are presently acing channelized. Considering that the creeks and ravines are subject to receiving seasonal canyon runoff and no bodies of water remained year -round to support fish - life. there is no Impact to fish. Wildlife habitat found below the foot - hi.la and canyons are those typically more tolerant of can's presence. Although thorn Ss no unique or endangered species, the loss of some vegetative cover and food resources will cause a slight reduction of said v /ldllfe habit. i I The City of Rancho Cucamoega is continuing to studT the maximizing of groundwater recharge potential utilizing retention facilities existing or propoacd within and to the north of the City. Upon completion, a draft of the proposed plan to au:imixe the groundwater recharge will be udm available. 9 h� i ro / JSifc of Cifur liu oov z OFF= OFFICE OF PLANNING ANO RESEARCH 1400 alwRM atnear SACRAMENTO 92814 October 28, 1981 11 (If CU=1401A Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engineer ;,=' [. i'r"WV:W hT OEM City of Rancho Ox=oya P.O. Boo 807 C',) Rancho Qtc==Sa, CA 91750 All FOA SU&TECI: SW 81072412 mvmkE mil3ta>vfi - "U:kw RbYISIO.V 11 i Dear Mr. Hibbs: State a;eneiss have cemented an your draft environmental impact report (see attached). if you would like to discuss their cone_ -.tIs and r4eoemen4aticne, please ccncxcc U's staff .-pa the Appropriate agencies. .then prepar!:.q t:e !L-Al 2:2t, you -I -c iuclide all caanta a•id rupomas (CECA :uidellnas, Sectimn 131461. The terrified 1~R mutt be tonsidarad in the decision- rakirq process for tho project. In addition, wa urge you to respond dirert-'y to _.a agencies' catsens by witl - -q to :.ha a, including, the State C1aarL- gSestaa asr`er an all eor_oarorlence. A recent Appa.lata Court factaloa 11 CSas_ry V. C-wrty df Starislaus clarilled ragz :resat :a for taspc: •.q to rev-as :oeon:a. Spae'�ica: :l, the rur-. iiditated :Sat zC= —one =S- be addressed in detail, glvlrq reasens why :he specific ccraanta ud au ;gestions ante not accepted and factors of ovvtrifi. -q Lmperance warrattitq an override of the suggestict. Responses to c—ents scat rat to tor„:_uzory at& -=". s but mast be suppcn ad by ecpirical or axparLaental data, ac!arci /it authority or explanatorf 1- fortation of any kind. The tourt further said that the responses most be a good lei h, reasoned analysis. Sactirn 1f0C2(J of the UVA Suidalilas eoquLras that a Bova ---w =al agency, tarts car -aln actioca if An fZ shows substantial adverse aavlronaental Lwpscu could result frrc; a grojacc. These actions include changing the project, imposinq condiriona or t:.e project, adopting plans or crdlnancaa to avoid the problem, selecting an altsr:.atite to the project, or disapprov!-Iq the project. rn the avant that the project la approved without adequate mitigation of siq:lficsrt offacts, the lead agency =or make written fi.:d_, -q3 for each si;rsfican- affect (SAct!an 13-3881 and It =at suppoct its actions with a written ccacament or ovArr!finq COraldarations for each ttIDltiga:ed significant effect (Secci.n 15039). I_` the projact requires discretionar., appr_val from awl state aganc,, Via Notice of :eta_- airatisr. zua- ce filed with the Sac--2t3--'f for Resources, as wel- as wick the := --tty Clark. plaasa o011:act Terry Robacts at (916) 445-0613 you :.ova awl ;ltastions. Sincerely. tars CJaarilgheuse /� :^ Xaa fel_cvs, C4T • T7 a . Syl�i(GalfrMa V ;� {; s .. _ Mn:mu. TNns�wti�Mw �wA Il�v,ina Ae�;� „AAemor and urn To ns. Ann Bartley, DOTP Deb October 15. 1986 Attention 3L•. D. husum M On- SBd -15- 3.066/5.: A•95 Coordinator 66- 4.083/9.1 SC-4 # 8107.2 412- r.m. . DD'AATMrNT OF TRM SPOItTATIOPA District 08 s.niw DEIR for Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Revision M1 We have reviewed the above- reforenccd document and request consider- ation of the following: The report should include and consider the status of State Route 30 (Foothill Freewry) since several proposed storm drains would cross that route. Route 30, between Damien Avenue in La Verne and Interstate 15E in San Bernardino, is presently being considered for abandonment due to lack of funding in the foreseeable future. Until a final decision is reached, limited funds have been authorized for right of way protection to preserve the corridor while various options are being considered. • For facilities proposed within state highway rights of way, we suggest the following: 1. Lines paral -el to the highway ahould be placed outside of the state highway right of way, particularly controlled- access facilities. 2. Transverse lines should cross the highway at right angles. 3. Lines may be required to be encased within the highway rights of way for ease of maintenance. It 1i anticipated that an encroachment permit will be seeded, and Caltrans, as a responsible agency, may require that certain mitigation measures be provided as condition for issuane" of a permit. we urge earlf and continuous liaison with Caltra,•s on proposed constructio.r plans as they affect state highways and relative to eom).a:..bility with proposed or existing state facilities. The document should address responsibility for maintenance of the storm drain lines located within state highway rights of way. 76 rc-0 • Ms. Ann Barkley Att Mr. D. Husum Page 2 October 15, 1981 Figure D, RECOMMENDED PLAN MAP, is of such poor quality that it is difficult to determine exactly where our highways might be impacted. Pleaso include a better copy of the map in the final doc=ent. We would like a copy of the final document as soon at it is available. If you have any questions, please contact Linda Laurin at (714) 383 -4550. • R. G. PCTc Chief, Transportation Planning LGL:ob cc: GEBOon Pile "e State dl California Memorandum lto~cea Ageaq of To . Terry Roberts Derv. October 1. 1981 • State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street. Room 121 Sacramento. CA 95814 f�wa California Regional War" Quality Conttol9oard —Santa Ana Region 9409 twptAMA AVQHUC. surTr Zoo, nlvenflon. aw 9ssn 8 -632 -4130 s"bprl' SCH # 81072412. COMPREHENSIVE STORM DRAIN PLAN REVISION 110. 1 -DEIR Review of the Draft Environmental Imoact Report (DEIR) Com milensive Storm Drain Plan Revision No. 1 has been completed by this office. The DEIR (0.34) states that further attention should be given to maximizing the groundwater recharge potential within the plan area. A draft of the proposed plan to maximize the groundwater recharge potential should be submitted to this office I there are any questions regarding these eorments please feel free to cc •• this office Staff Engineer MGS:kyb nQ� ; V 1100 C'r:! v,` riil N} h �nZ eYir C Y 7L' © -r" ? •Clr_iNA•. ONIA410 CAUI00N1A 911.1 Atlw GODt ilA �t41lll October 21, 1981 ENGINEERING OEPARTHENT CITY OF F,ohtl'U UC�A1 ONGA CWMUNII r EEVE:OPMEUr OW. OCT S;f 1981 Mr. Lloyd 8 Hubbs, City Engineer AM CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA 718191m1111121112131Q15 6 P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Hr. Hubbs: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT C014PREHENSIVE STORM DRAIti PLAN, REVISION No. i This is to inform ,rou that the City of Ontario, Engineering Department, concurs with the findings of the above subject Environmental impact Report as submitted to us for review and have no comments. eThank you for the opportunity to participate in the review process. Cordial'y. 'LAWRENCE 11 Assistant City Engineer LAH:ile 9 r,ei�l�il ..ITY or R. IAC! CL'CA611DNuA ComjAmm nM OPMENT DEPT. L.' 15 1981 AU w1 October 12, 1961 419i9ig)101L'i112i�i4i5i8 i Mr. Lloyd Hubbs. Eng. Divisior City of Rancho Cucamonga 04=nity Development Dept. P.O. Box 807 Cucamonga. CA 91730 Dear Hr Hubbs IN lei CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TtU9PW%t 17141 [[7.1712 TH[O T NOWAK acme @w Hu@@tN Subject: Draft EIR. Comprehensive Storm Drain Revisions No. 1 Thank you for the op;ortunity to review the subject EIR. In addition to our normal response to environmental Impact report announcements wherein we rife; to our primary service functions, (Regional Domestic Haste Water Treatment and Disposal. Non - reclaimable Haste Collection, Importation of Supplemental Water and Management of the Chino Groundwater • Basin) we wish to direct your attention to the following. Many of the proposed storm drain channels may affect the District's Nan- reclaimable :taste Collection system and Domestic Waste Interceptor Lines If the adopted storm drain does affect the District's facilities, we request that the agency responsible for implementing the plan also be responsible for the protection and /or relocation of these affected facilities Your attention to this item will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Theo Nowak, General tianager CHIII BItSIN 1i011�CIPAI WATER DISTRICT i 1 Il b� r� Dona Pd R. Peters Office Manager DRY /1V1K/mw �•� • • •1.Y- 2� -.1 -. - . '� .tA+A I1vt�C+.•w•�- \-n +r. Y.t N a a1lCN `. • - OtJIG[ A NagA mmMN L AVC[RfOr. tQ.AND \ ODU2 w,a +r 1 IA WCM ♦+.w..t vm.rn@l.,t tn.NM[.w..... 171 t1 Z.f.rr .?+...�.. _ .. C. 1 • 1 @111 AIC"I\tl0 AYINYC M[t OIIICC IOt I/1 CYC1Ypy0A Cal11OINeA t,7So - �•� • • •1.Y- 2� -.1 -. - . '� .tA+A I1vt�C+.•w•�- \-n +r. Y.t N a a1lCN `. • - OtJIG[ A NagA mmMN L AVC[RfOr. tQ.AND \ ODU2 w,a +r 1 IA WCM ♦+.w..t vm.rn@l.,t tn.NM[.w..... 171 t1 Z.f.rr .?+...�.. _ .. C. 1 =A z The )Metropolitan Water District of Southern California SEP 2 Mr. Lloyd B. Subbs , ( .. • Dptln -N Community Development Department Ct.(ygN`t `tgk �TO� EngDine�xn807Division tWl' 21 X351 PH P. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ct514151il Dear Mr. Bubba, itg,9l�t 1 D -aft LIR C�morehensive Storm Drain Plan Revison Nn. 1 Thank you for your lettsr, dated September 9, 1961, transmitting the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed storm drain plan revisions. Based on your comprehensive storm drain plan, Plate 1, a portion of Metropolitan's Ria -to pipeline and Upper Feeder 'Feline are located within the boundaries of the ptojecL ate... In ., tam 2 -2 storm drains 2A, 2F and 2I would crows our 10 -foot- • inside - diameter Rialto Reach pipeline. In System 2 -3 storm drain 3R would cross our 8 -foot- inside - diameter Rialij pipeline. In System 2 -4 storm drain 43 would cross our 10- foot - inside- diameter Rialt,, pipeline. In System 2 -5 storm drain 5D, System 2 -6 storm drain 6E, System 2 -7 storm drain 7A, and Systum 2 -19 storm drains 19A and 190 all would cross our 12 -foot 0- inch - inside - Jiameter Upper Feeder pipeline. Any development that could affect Metropolitan's facilities and its fee property and easements must be brought to our attention prior to commencing conatruct'_on. Plan and profile drawings of our pipelines may be obtained bf callinvi Mr. Jim Pale, telephone (213) 626.4282. extension 364. We appreciate your cooperation in keeping us infors ' of your development activities. 9 DAR /rg Very truly yours, Olen N. Smith Princ. pal Engineer Envirormental Planning Branch la3 t: urn a nwowa._.tts jcts i,t 90. a u J . o....,., DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES F. o. B. un L .at.CEs (213 t U620 -4107 CITY OF RMIC30 O COYNU41TV CrM OPN(Ni1DEN T. My Bull OCT 9 1981 7j81g1W11i 111121314151(3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Peat office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Attenticn: Hr. Lloyd B. Humbs. City Manger Notice of Preparation of a CEIR for Revision of Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan. SCH 81072412 The Departmnt of Hater Resources recommends that the following areas should be considered in the preparation of the DEIR. 1. Non - structural alternative for the storm drain plan. 7. Any impact to fls� and vildllie habitat originated by this project. 3. My impact to ground water, such as percolation rate, quantity, and quality. The City of Cut ODSa Is participating in the regular phase of the National Flood Insurance Program (N?rP). 7.uuce a very large portion of the City is designated as special flood hazard 1t6a, the development and design of this comprehensive storm drain plan should be adapted to the rncuirements and guidelines ostabl shel for the NFIP. Complation by the , S. Corps of Eoginaers' Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Project will m,rove this hazard. Sincerely, .'i e. &7 /'Lf Robart 1' D. Chun. Chief !w Plaanin;, Rranch Southern District cc: Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Sc:eet Sacraments, CA 93814 • �rB 1 �u a Li 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE February 17, 1982 TO* Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROKAMAL ASSESSVZ f AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 82 -C1 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of - - -- Cucamonga recommending approval of a Zoning Ordinance finen&ent modifying Section 61.0219 of the Zoning Code to provide for regulation of compact car parking spaces. SUMMARY: The proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment would allow compact car anJbbicycle parking spaces to be included in public, commercial, and resi- dential parking lots as part of their required number of off -street parking spaces Also it would provide regulations for the design and distribution of compact car spaces and bicycle parking spaces. ANALYSIS: The Planning Commission, at its reeting of January 27, held a TuTy public hea -ing to consider the Zoning Ordinancw Amendment for compact car parking space regulations, a,id voted (3-2) to recommend approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 82 -01 with the inclusion of bicycle parking regulations as found in the Industral Specific Plan. Section III, Subsection IV C.5 and 6 of the Industrial Specific'Plan reads as follows: S. Bicycle storage facilities shall be provided with n all development and relate to planned and existing bicycle rout ^s 6. Required on -site parking may be reduced, at a rate of one automobile parking space per four spaces of bicycle or other two - wheeled vehicular parking, up to three auto- mobile parking spaces or 5% of total required on -site parking, whichever is less. /05 Uning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -01 City Council Agenda February 17, 1982 Page 2 ` 3 The potential for congestion within the right -of -way caused by larger cars parking in compact car spaces was discussed. A motion was made to recommend to City Council the drafting of an Ordinance which would authorize the posting of signs stat+ng that persons parking in compact car spaces with regular size cars would Le ticketed, and also to authorize the police derartment to issue those tickets. The motion was carried by a vote of 4 to 1. No correspondence was received by the Planning Commission, nor was there any opposition voiced at the Commission hearing. RECOMMENDATION._ The Planning Commission has recovaended that the City Council approve Zon ng Ordinance Amendment 82 -01 as pressnted on the attached Ordinance and consider approving an ordinance authorizlnr, ticketing of illegally parked can in compact spaces. Respectfully submitted, JACK UW, AICP Director of Cammnity Davelopmer.t Jl AT:jr IJ Attachments- Planntvg .awission Staff Report Plan nine Commission Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance E )a(10 ORDINANCE NO. , 701 e CUCA` fONCA,CCALIFORNiA.TAMENDINGLSECTION 61.0219(b) OFF OF THE CITY OF RANC THE MJNICrrAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR REGULATION OF COMPACT CAR AND BICYCLE PARKING SPACES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaronga, California, hereby ordains the following: SECTION 1: Section 61 0219(b) of the Municipal Code is hereby amandeFt—oadd (1) (F) and (2) (L) as follows (1) General Conditions i w (F) Required on -site parking ray be reduced, at a rate of one automobile parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle or other two wheel vehi- cular parking, up to three automobile parking spaces or 5% of total required on -site parking, whichever is less. ' (2) Minimum Design Standards (L) Public, residential, commercial or irdustrtai sites may designate up to 20% of their Barking stalls for comyact car use Such stalls shall be not less than eight (8) feet wide ny sixteen indicated for9usedbyhcca� act arslonly9ned or SECTION 2: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance wid the City Clerk shat al use Lire same to be published within fifteen (ISI days after its passage at least once in The 4 _D_a�iY art. a newspaw of general circulation published in thee City0f tar o, California, ami circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSEr, APPROVED. and ADOPTED this day of , 19 AYES Nor A,SEN' (o-7 L lJ C CITY OF FANChC CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 27, 1982 TO Members of the Planning Commission FRWi Jack Lam, AiCP, Director of Community Development BY Ariane Troup, Assistant Planner SieJECT ENYIRONFFIiTAL AtLSESSPXNT AND Z0, G ORDINANCE AtEU MENT NO. 82-01 - A zo ut ono the P ann ng Camiss�' ire —of Rancho Cucanorga recommending approval of a Zoning Ordlnanco Amendment modifyingg Section 61.0219 of the Zoning Code :o provide for 'egulation of compact car parking spaces. Stt4+ARY. The Planning Div'sion has initiated this request for an ariend- aeet of the Zoning Ordinance in order to bring the present parting require- oents into conformance with the industrial Specific Plan and with certain goals and policies of the Gireral Plan regarding energy conservation and preservation of open space. The amendment would allow 20% of the required parking spaces in public, cormercial, and residential develoisrsnts to be designed for compact car use. OACKGROONO: Currently our Zoning Ordinance does not allow for compact cancan stelTs. Section III E4 of the Industrial Specific Plan, adopted in August 1981, includes a provision that 20: of the required parkinn stalls be designated for compact car use, and estahlithes a standard minimum size of 8' wide by 16' long for compact car stalls. Striping, maneuverability. and access requirement remain the same av those out- lined in the Zoning Ordinance. A coariercial development proposed for the southwest corner of Foothill _ Boulevard and Ramona Avenue has proposed the use of compact car stalls in it, parking area. Staff feels that this Is an appropriate time to consider cou act car parking "quirements and to Incorporate them into the Zoning Ord nanee. ANALYSIS. The proposed size criteria of 8' wide by 16' tong for compact car stalTs Is consistent with the adopted industrial Specific Plan. It is reconaended that the 20L figure be used as was in the Industrial Olen. We would -ecc=nd that this be monitored and adjustments made if neces- sary I bCK ITEN D Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -01 Planning Ccmission ACen"_a January 27, 1982 Page 2 The adopted General Plan includes several statements in support of the proposed concept in its goals, objectives, anJ policies for Circulation, Community Design, and Corservation of Resources. (See pages 13, 17, 18, 46 and 12S.) Part Ii of the Initial Study, coopleted by staff, is on file and available for review. No edverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of {his proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordianance. CORRESPONDENCE: This ftem has been advertised in a newspaper c° .•-eral circu- at on. o mate, no correspondence has been received regarding is proposal. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission issue a Negative c arat on cr the proposal and racommecd aoproval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -01 to the City Council Should the Commission concur, the appropriate Resolution has been attached for consideration ResDcctfully submitted, JACK IAN, AICP Director of Community Development JL:AT:jr attachments Resolution of Approval x j�% I� U 0 Ll 0 RESOLUTION (to. 82 -1S A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMA :SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 82 -01 MODIFYING SECTION 61.0219(b) OF THE ZONING CODE PROVIDIiG FOR RFSULAT :GN OF CCM- PACT CAR PARKING SPACES WHEREAS, the Planning Comaission held a duly edvertised public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment 81 -01; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission seeks to provide comprehensive parking standards in keeping with the goals and objectives of the City General Plan with regards to conservation of open space and energy; and WHEREAS, the Industrial Spet.iffe Plan Includes compact car parking requirements. SECTION 1: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Co— ncTf apo roval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -01 which nadifies Section 61.0219(b) of the Zoning Code by adding (1)(F) and (2)(L) as follows: ® (1) General Conditions: (F) 0.90-ed On :It. parking may be reduced at a rate of one automobile parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle or other two wheel venicular parking up to three automobile parking spaces or 5% of total required on -site parking, whichever is less. (2) Minimum Design Standards: (L) Public, residential, commercial or industrial sites guy designate up to 20% of their parking stalls for compact ror use. Such stalls shall be not less than efght (8) feet wide by six- teen (16) feet long and shall be clearly signed or indicated for use by compact can only. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that this amena:ent will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the enviromrent and therefore recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1982. PLANTING CO?flISSION OF THE -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Is BY � Ili Resolution No. 8 -Is Page 7. .L �ATTEST• G ecretary o t e ann h9 omm ss on • I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc+monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, pissed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho CucamDnga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of January, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Repel, Sceranka, King NOES CO11MISSIONERS: Dahl, Tolstoy ABSENT COVMISSIONERS: None E IW 3, _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cAa STAFF REPORT 0 U07 DATE: February 17, 1982 [FROM: TO: Meabers of the City Council. and City Manager Jack Lac, AICP, Director of Coacamtty Development BY: Michael Yairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH LESHEY DE4ELOPMEHf COMPANY FOR bEVE WaN PR EL On a northwest corner of emon and Haven Avenues BACKGROUND: In April of 1981, the Planning Coouission approved the plan er a evelopment of 117 apartment units on 8.3 acres of land in the R -3 zone located on the northwest enrner of Leann and Haven Avenues. • The project is being �aveloped totally as an affordable housing project and meets the criteria as defined by Section 50093 of the Health and Safety code. Although the projects only distinctive feature is financi,.g by CHFA, State Government Code Section 65915 -65918 requires local juris- dictions to either grant a density bonus or alternate incentives for projects which contain at least 255 of the total units for person and families in the affordable category. The City's General Plan was adopted without a density bonus mechanism. Therefore, the City's ability to grant a density bonus for this particular project in accordance with State laws is not possible. The other alter- native available to the City to meet the mandate of this law is to offer other financial incentives for the developer. There fore, a Davelopaent Agreement has been prepared between the City and Lesnay Development Company in accordance with G.C. 65915- 65918. Attached is a copy of that Agreement which requires final review and approval by the City council. State law states that if a density bonus is not granted, that not less than two other bonus incentives must be granted for the development of the project. Staff has reviewed the various options available in granting other alternatives. The incentives listed in the attached Agreement are ones which the staff feels would least impact the city in regard to any direct cost. Previously, the Applicant was proposing such incentiv -s as reducing plan check fees or inspection fees; however, these fees are cha-ged to pay for the direct i' cost incurred ,y our service. Therefore, it was staff's recommendation that those kinds of incentives not be granted. 3, _ Development Agreement with Lesney Development Co. e City Council Agenda February 11, 1982 Page 2 RECOWNDRTION: It is recommended that the City Council review the Agreement or a cons eration and approval and adoption. Respectfully s ttted, Director of Community Development * JL:MV:jr Attachment: Development Agreement • V�. 0 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 19x2 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM* Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Devalopment BY: Tim J. Beadle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON ETIHANDA SPECIFIC PLAN BACKGROUND: Progress on the nreparation of the Spr:ific Flan for the MwaAa is proceeding well. The Etiwanda Committee has been meeting on an average of two times a month since the process was started in August. The Committee meetings have been structured to provide an opportunity to review a W acted topic area and to receive public input. In addition, the Committee has held two *Town Hall" meetings in order to encourage the broadest possible input. The Coomittee's effort to prepare a Specific Plan involves two areas: (1) to educate itself and the public as to the issues and solutions which are possible in Etinonda; and, (2) to decnrmfne the appropriate policy recommendations which can be used to develop the details of the Specific Plan. It is these two aspect: that most characterize the process which the Committee has undergone during the meetings. Attached to this report is the overall v= schedule for the Specific Plan. Th• -chedule calls for the Commit!-- to continue work on the prelfmi 'tan including land use. The preliminary Plan includes polfcfe. the selected top lc areas. To refresh your msmoory, the Committee set out topic areas which they wish to review at selected meetings. These include: o Community Character o Circulation o Commercial Centers o Parks o Equestrian Areas o Community Trails o Land Use AdJustments o Architecture o Public Services Status Report on Etiwanda Specific Plan City Council Agenda February 17, 1982 Page 2 Attached to this report you will also find a summary of Committee considerations and a composite map with major concepts. The Committee 1s currantly reviewing land use censidoratiors and have sele:ted four subareas within Etiwanda in order to further refine their approach towards land use (see attached map). Staff presented the Committee witl. four land use alternative maps from which the Committee chose a land use base in order to begin their review. The Committee has made no particular land use designation other than to start with a land use base which will help focus their concepts. It is this process which the Committee is currently involved and it is anticipated that several more meetings will be necessary in order to complete the review of the land use. Throughout this process public input has beet encouraged and, indeed, has been quite extensive at times. Members of the Coamittee have met with property owners on an individual basis and in small groups to discuss their concerns. In addition, staff has provided the Committee a review of the input received from property owners. As described earlier, once the Committee has completed the review of within the selected topic areas, staff will be preparinq a detailed Plan which includes all the development standards and guidelines nee Etiwanda The Committee has been proceeding well through the topics previously; however, because laf�d use is such a major consideration I mittee, more time will be necessary In that area before staff can bet the detailed Specific Plan. It is anticipated that this will add sow time in the preparation of the draft Specific Plan. However, it is e pated that the draft Plan should he complete for public distribution summer months. Res ctgulyy s bmitted, JACK (( / /LAAN. AAIICCP Director of Community Development JL TJB:jr fttachments: Time Schedule Summary of Committee Considerations Summary Map Subarea Map 'and Use Map as o:tt:ined a the Com- tn uo-K on e ad,itioual till antici- during the • • ,. ( w � 0 w U C0 2 < � rL &, L $� Q • w ; $ . o ! z _. w 0 |1( o |2 LU �\ § �] k [�/ 2 m k »&k; : a� !� LI _ � |1( V ArTACWENr I ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN COMMITTEE 1981 OCTOBER UPCOMING AGENDAS • Conceptual Circulation Commercial Centers • Windbreaks NOVEMBER • Residential Concepts /Standards • Parks and Open Space • Trails and Equestrian Areas DECEMBER • Preilminary Land Use Plan • Streets and CircuiaUcn • Architectural Aesigi • Public Services and Safety It 7 ■ ip L' r SUI,TIARY OF COMtITTEE MISIOERATIONS TO DATE Character o Preservation of the Etiwanda windrow system. o Replacement of the Rlue Gum species of Eucalyptus with a more appropriate variety of tree. o Preservation of the "rural' character associated with Etiwanda Circulation o Establishment of an "East Avenue Bypass" designed to traffic away from the Etiwanda cove. o Establishment of an "umbrella loop" designed to pry Etiwanda from traffic generated in the sphere of in north of 24th Street. o Limit Foothill Freeway (Route 30) access to Day LreeK a0.: Chevy Avenues only. No freeway access to be provided at East and Etiwanda Avenues. o Depress the Foothill Freeway (Route 30) facility whenever possible d p lon anytfuturemmajor access regionaland trafficsartery. inrestric- tions the . event the Foothill Freeway is not constructed. o Provide alternotive vehicular access to the proposed High School to reduce traffic impacts upon East, Etiwanda. and Victoria Avenues Commercial o Establish one neighbo ^hood commerciai center (5 -10 acres), located to tha general vir -lnity of Highland and the East 4venue B1;iass Road o Establish a convenience commercial center (1 -3 acres). located at Foothill and Etiwanda. - o Provide a freeway - related commercial facility locatcd on the 1 8 acre site at the northwest corner of East and Base Line o Provide a freftay- related coomerrial facility (1 -3 acres), located at Cherry Avenue and the Devore Freeway o To establish a convenience commercial center in the northwest quadrant of Etiwanda, provided the viability of such a center can be demonstrated. ' A �7�t:�YG *� :,i A "° .a.• .i.$ -" 4.�$i -wR __'.$"; �'h- ii1NF' Parks o Establishment of three "medium sized" neighborhood parks, located in the general vicinity of: . 1. Summit and East Avenue (Summit Park). 2 The Etiwanda "core" (Etiwanda Park, East, Ettwanda, Highland, Victoria). (Floating location) 3 Miller Avenue, Etiwanda Avenue, East Avenue, Foothill Boulevard (Miller Park). (Floating location) • Establishment of a "small sized" neighborhood lark to be located south of Foothill Boulevard, within the project area • Size of these parks is to be determined based on land use densities in their relative service areas Eques.rian Areas • Future equestrian residential uses should be established in a designated equestrian- oriented area. • The Specific Plan should achieve a balance between the cost of and the need for trails and other equestrian facilities. • Future equestrian uses should be discouraged outside the equestrian area unless the lots are a minimum of 211 acres or the property has direct access to a equestrian trail Standards should bu employed to guarantee separation and buf'ering from adjacent uses. • The use of common equestrian facilities (stables, rirk" sccess • trallsl, should be encouraged. • That the areas north of Summit Avenue, west of East Ettwanda Creek be designated as an equestrian residential area • Establish a "residential equestrian area" with common equestrian facilities to be located in the are,r north of Highland, east of East Ettwanda Creek and west of Che-ry Avenue. Equestrian uses are to be considered optional and if elected to be used, will be located within common equestrian facilities Community Trails • Establishment of the most "extensive and intensive" community trail system the Community can be expected to afford. • The trait system is to include multi -uses (horse, bicycle, pedestrian) whenever feasible • if the proposed trail system is not 'affordable" various alternative solutions are to be considerea in the following order: 1 Increase the assessment area. 2. Increase the equestrian area. 3. Decrease trail system development 4. Decrease "scope" of trail system. o Establishment of a "passeos" system, designed to link residential areas to activity centers I • j�. P lo•unu e u ® .. YM teY ;any u�C, •YL..MIP y :. '.::1010i• 10 S GyMU1LC• Its— . /Iyn,a•n0a1 1, .•�LN IYOUST61a ESL Wr. .4\ 1.41 ��0•n OYHmipI 3pc. µl v ^nF�i jig •� -Y•W. :Y «.ne «.••a MR y{ , C•en..t 4.1,•1141 rlesa NLLIr V]�_f TY•IIYq l �iC•a1I.1 /C•IIµM 'v"E.{ . ••u•• t �� s��C<•uMItIL j / /��MO.•1141 T '\ UV a ft VL e I H, /• p0. VL. i - i L I Nap ?.-A • NESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES =VL n.,.c. P _ u.eWUn M i M � � Yla,lsi I.G„ H ,KNCWHT 1/ . 1 ET11ti %Nnk n ITCMC PLAN # • ��cYl,1 Gy.�.=: per- Ll r.w Ce nuj Fr L f� IIY � TT��^ l 1l , Small- PL%.x Yj,� w«wllwwl OMw Twit "Y i `J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 17, 1982 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY Rick M.rks, Associate Planner SUBJECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRA14T PROGRAM: STATUS RE The City Council has received a notebook containing all of the staff work completed to date regarding the Community Development Block Grant Prorram. The purpose of the status report is to explain the contents of the notebook, answer any questions Council members may have and to keep the City Council abreast of the Program's progress. As the process is now established, there wilt be a legal public hearing before the City Council to discuss the Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives, at which time the City Council must select those programs it wishes to see funded. Upon Council selection of programs to be funded, staff will begin the federally required environmental review processing of these projects. Upon reviewing the CDBG notebook, the following items will be most revealing of where we are in the process, how we got there and where we are going next. Section Description /Notes Work Schedule Cetailed schedule; list of critical dates Cover letters /Memo A narrative review of the CDBG process and staff work Needs Assessment Housing kehabiiitation U A staff conducted review of City needs, possible programs, and recommended programs; from the results of this orocess the Pre- liminary Statement of C-imnunity Objectives was based and written (the material in in chronological order with the most current material on top). (Material presented to City Council at-its - February 3 meeting.) 3 ) 2 • Community Development Block Grant Status Report City Council Agenda February 17, 1982 Page 2 Section Description /Notes Statement of Cortmunity Staff's recommendation for program funding; Objectives publicly circulated; will fcrm the basis of public discussion and Council rdview at the March 17, 1982 public hearing; HUD required document Attachments Supportive /informative material; rotes; significant correspondence; (material inserted to give City Council more insight into staff's thinking, recommendations, and work produced). c When reviewing the material please bear to mind that there are as yet two unknowns which can and will sharply impact the program. The first of the s that the Reagan Administration 1s rewriting all of the regulations govern ` CUBG Program but won't lie ready to release them until April or May of thi Therefore staff has relied on the anticipations of local HUD staff, prier t regulations which seem likely to remain in effect, and educated guesses. 1' believe the work so far accomplished in "on target' but obviously must aw 1 release of the new regulations. The second unknown is the level of funds can expect. We have received no official notice concerning our level of and therefore cannot at this time make a recommendation to the Council or t public. •j` Respectfully submi d, i JACK LAN, A1CP Director of Community Development JL:RM:Jr u:a* ,r ., . ;gip•: �c, t major e is ng the tho V1 u • �r y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM February 11, 1502 TO: City Council FROM: Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk SUBJECT: Resolution Ho. 82 -37 At the time the Agenda wus prepared, Resolution No. 82 -37 hrd riot beer com- pleted. However, it is anticipated that by Wednesday that the task will be completed and a completed copy can be presented at that time. I am enclosing the partial document now for your review. If you have any suggestions or comments, please call. .x Jj -116. a RESOLUTION NO. ; a •37 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCBO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, FSTAELISHING VOTING P.'tE:C .ICTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT EOARD MEMBERS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, HERETOFORE CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. OF THE CITY COUNCIL i WHEREAS, a general municipal election to be held on Tuesday, April 1.3, 1982, has been heretofote called by Resolution No. 2 -1 , adopted on _ NON, TMRE, IRS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DOTS KVXBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOILOHS: SECTION '. That for tiro purpose of holding said re ar general municipal elac, re shall be and arm hereby, ea[nblis 19 voting Pro- in- ti co: is oft regular election precincts 3a City of Reecho Cuea- moega established for t holding of state and county actions, rte said regular election precincts Zia_ a the date of adoption of a resolution. That the polling places for theNrespective precincts s be the places hereinafter designated; and that the pe one hereinafter ram ,being competent and quali- f1M electors and resie sacs said City era h eby appointed precinct board mecbere for [heir rcape:[Sve v tang precinct and they shall hold sa•a ula. _ion and make return thereof In the vast pro ed by law. Voting Precinct 1 (Compriox regular election precincts 1, 2 and 3) Polling Place: Davie Rea ence, 6235 Cameo Street, Alta Loma Inspector: Cynthia Dav)4, U35 Cameo Street, Alta Loma Judge: Vase Meserole 797E chard, Alta Lorca Judge: Cacherf¢e S th, 8811 rune, Alta Loma Voting Pretier (Comprising ra sr electio¢ precincts 4 and 6) Polling Plnc Stork School, 5646 riper, Al[a Loma Inspector: Judge: izabath Nicassio, 8614 Hills a Rd., Alta Loma Judge: Retry Casa, 8837 Strang Lane, a Loma Voting Precinct 3 (Comprising regular elec n precincts 7 and 8) Polling Place: Alta Loma Junior High Schwl 9000 Lemon, Alta lama Inspectors Sandra Oazly, 5652 IDereld, Alta Judge: Madelin_ Shipley, 8914% Alta Loma Drive Alta Loma Judge: Alice Patronite, 6018 Falling Tree, Al Loma Voting Precinct 4 (Comprising regular election precincts 5, 9 and 52) Polling Place: Jasper Schad, 6881 Jasper Street, Alta lama Inspectors Felton Montle, 6147 Topaz, Alta Loma Judge: LaVae Stevenson, 6320 Topaz, Alta Loma 'udge: Linda Conley, 6349 Holly Oak, Alta Loma Page 2 Voting Precinct 5 (Comprising regular election precincts 10, 12, 14) Polling Place: Camelian School, 7105 Carnelian, Alta Low O Inspector: Dorothy Knauer, 8765 Monte Vista, Alta Loma Jndge: Lillie Deambrogio, 6778 Hellman, Alta Loma Judge Voting Precinct 6 (Comprising regular election precincts 13, 536 55) Polling Place: Church of the Nazarene, 9944 Highland, Alta Low Inspector: Judge: Judge: Voting Precinct 7 (Comprising regular election precincts 15, 16, 17) Polling Place: Alta Loma Elementary School, 7085 Amethyst, Alta Low Inspector: Marjorie Hodson, 9529 Nineteenth Street, Alta Lcma Judge: Lyme Williams, 9433 Mignonette, Alta Loaf Judge: Bobbie Cill, 9336 La Crawe St., Alta Loma Voting Precinct 8 (Comprising regular election precincts 20, 56) Polling Place: Chaffey College, 5885 Haven Avenue, Alta Low Inspector: Pat Jackson, 6431 Haven Avenue, Alta Loma Judge: Judy Ott, 4571 Archibald, Alta Loma Judge: Evelyn Hedberg, 10590 Apple lane, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 9 (Comprising regular election precincts 18, i9, 54) Poll. g Place: Alto Laguna Mobile Rome Park, 10210 Baseline Ave., Alta Loma rnupactor: Kathryn Pearson, 9998 Monte Vista, Alm lama Judge: Audrey Zimmerman, 10210 Baseline, 1214, Alta Loca Judge: Stella Entices, 10350 Baseline, 112, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 10 (Comprising regular election precincts 21, 23, 30, 311 Polling Place: Etivanda School, 6925 Etivanda Avenue, Etivanda Lwpmtor: Carol Lombardo, 13041 Pinon, Etivanda Judge: Isla Mc7owld, 13006 Larrera, Etivanda Judge: Constance Bredlau, 13040 Pinan, Etivanda Voting Precinct 11 (Comprising regular election precincts 24, 25, 40, 50, 51) Polling Place: Neighborhood Center, 9791 Arrar Route, Cucamonga Inspector: Judge: Judge: Voting Precinct 12 (Comprising regular election precincts 48, 49) Polling Place: Dow Merced School, 10333 Palo Alto Street, Cucamonga Inspector: Barbara Maxfield, 10176 Norvick, Cucamonga Judge: Lillian Connolly, 10269 Dorset, Cucamonga Judge: Judith Hill, 9533 Hampshire, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 13 (Comprising regular election precincts 45, 47) Polling Place: Central School, 7955 Archibald Avenue, Cucamonga Inspector: Judge: Nyla Clover, 7515 Burgundy, Cucamonga Judge 2 Page 3 Voting Precinct 14 (Comprising regular election precincts 42, 43, 44) Polling Place: Cucamonga Tntercediato School, 7611 Hellman, Cucamonga Inspector: Barbara Cakle, 9630 San Bernardino Road Cucamonga Judge: Nary wards, 9673 San Bernardino, Cucamonga Judge: Louiaa wade, 9674 Balaa, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 15 (Comprising regular election precincts 34, 41) Pilling Place, Lions Park Commuuity Building, 9161 Baseline, Cucamonga Inspector: Judie: Judge: Voting ?recinct 16 (Comprising regular election precincts 11, 32, 33, 35, 36) Polling Place: Valle Vista Schoo., 7727 Valle Vista, Cucamonga Inspector: Virginia Nathahs, 7822 Alta Guests, Cucamonga Judge Sally Hattie, 7723 Calls Casino, LLramenga Judge: Voting Precinc 17 ( Comprising regular el [ion precir --ts 37, 38) Polling Place: ubba Residence, 8432 Wow Route, Cucamonga Inspector: Judit Hobbs, 8432 Arrow A6ute, Cueamnga Judge: Judy Eric ov, 8438 row ute, Cucamonga Judge: Helen Boar, 8651 Fall' , Sp. 14, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 18 ( rf g regular election precincts 39, 46 Polling Place: Cram II dance, 8227 Layton, Cucamonga Inspector: Patricia ee 8227 Layton, Cucamonga Judge: Joan Mlle, 78 Jadhjte, Cucamonga Judge: Voting PrecinV 19 (Compriaia; re ction precincts 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 Polling Place: None SECTION 2. That tbu rspensatlon of the perabno herefabefore named e3 precinct board members is herr.:,y fired at the sum of $40.01) for each Inspector and $35.00 for each Judge fo said election. The rental for each of such polling places where a charge is made, saill Fe the sum of $30.00 for oaid election, when required, the compensation of the G.s:o,..an of a building shall be $_ for said election. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to V e passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Revolutions of said City; and shall make a •cinute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON AYES: IWES: ABSENT: • ors ATTE51: �R w r +•City Clerk of the C' �y 1982. Nayor of the City of RAncho Cucamonga a Cucamonga r�� h RESOLUTION NO. `9 - Zi A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13, 1982, TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK WHEREAS, a -•egular general municipal election will be held and conducted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Tuesday. April 13, 1982, as reg0red by law; ani WHEREAS, the City Council of said City desires the canvass of said election to be made by the City Clerk of said City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAdCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOOS SECTION 1: That pursuant to Section 22932.5 of the Elections Code of thetate of California, the canvass of the regular general municipal election to be held in said city is hereby ordered to be made by the City Clerk • SECTION 2: That the City Clerk of said City shall prior to the Tuesdayyfollowing the election co,Tplete the canvass of said election and shall certify the results to this City Council on April 20, 1982. SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adopticn— of-5Ts Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 1982 AYES: NOES: ABSENT Phillip D. Schlosser, Mayor ATTEST- Lauren M. Wasserman,—Nt—y`TTe—rE „ r � RESC.LUTION N0. 82 -37 .F A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA;: dCA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS AND FLUNG COMPENSATION FOR THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, APRIL 13. 1982, WHEREAS, a general municipal elonclon to be held on Tuesday. April 13, 1982, has been heretofore called by Resolution No. 82 -1 , adopted on January 6, 1982 ; NON. THCREFORE, THE CITY CWIdCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. DOES HAtEBY RESOLVZ, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That for the purpose of holding said rgvlar general municipal election, there shall be and are hereby established 19 voting rc- clncta consisting of the regular election precincts in the City of Reecho C:ca- mnga established for the holding of state and coeity elections, as said regular election precincts exist on the date of adoption of this resolution. That the polling places for the respective precincts shall be the places hereinafter designated; and that the persona hereinafter =ad, being compatant and quali- fied electors and residents of said City are hereby appointed precinct board members for their respective voting nrecincts and they shall hold said election and make return thereof in the =met provided by L:v. Voting Precinct 1 (Comprising regular alect!on precincts 1, 2 and 3) Polling Place: Davie Residence, 6235 Cacao Street, Alcor Lor, Inspector: Cynthia Davis, 6235 Cameo SLraet. Alta Lama Judge: Rosa Meserole, 7975 Orchard, Alta Loma JWgo: Catherine Smith, 8811 Ltrlim, Alta Lama Voting Precinct 2 (Comprising regular election precincts 4 and 6) Polling Place: Stork School, 5646 Jasper, Alto Loma Inspector: Edith Bonhus. 9086 Appoloom, Alta Loma Judget Elizabeth Miasmic, b614 Hillside Pd., Alta Loma Judge: Batty Cast, 8837 Strang Laze, Alta Loma Voting Precinct 3 (Comprising regular election precincts 7 and 8) Polling Place: Alta Loma Junior high School, 9000 Lemon, Alta Loma Inspector: Sandra Oarly, 5657 Emerald, Alta Loma fudge: Madeline Shipley, 5915 Alta Lora Drive, Alta Loma :dge: Alice Patronize, 6018 Telling Tree, Alta Lora Votleg Precinct 4 (Comprising regular election precincts 5, 9 and 52) Polling Place: .Tdsper School, 6881 Jasper Street, Alta Low Impactor: Felton Montle, 6147 Topaz, Alta Loma Judge: LaVae Stevenson, 6320 Topaz, Alta Loma Judge: .ends Conley, 6349 Holly Oak, Alta Loma ':ic. Page 2 Voting Precinct 5 (Comprising regular election precincts 10, 129 16) Polling Place: Carnelian School, 7105 Carnelian, Alta L,ma Inspector: Dorothy Komar, 8765 v, its Vista, Alta Low Judge: Lillis reambrugfo. 6778 r,: Lxau, Alta Loma Judge: Delores dryar, 1090 Germ• Alta Lena Voting Precinct 6 ( Compriaing regular election precincts 13, 53, 55) Polling Place: Church of the Nararena. 9944 Highland, Alta Lama Inspector: Ruth Ha.te, 6880 Archibald, Ito. 75, Alta Low Judge: Judge: Voting Precinct 7 (Comprising reguL r eleution precincts 15, 160 17) Polling Place: Alt& ism Elementary School, 7085 Amethyst, Alta Lame Inspector: Mar)oris Bossed, 9529 Nineteenth Street, Alta Loma Judge: Lynne W111Lvus, 9433 Mignonette, Alta Lew Judge: Bobbi•2 Gill, 9336 La Grande St., Alta Ionia Voting Precinct 8 'Comprising regular election precincts 20, 56) Polling Plate: Cha£fsy College, 5885 Haven Avenue, Alta Loma Inspector: Par tackson, 6431 Haven Avenue, Alta Ionia Judge: Judy Ott, 4571 Archibald, Alta Iow Judge: Eralyn Hedberg, 10590 Apple Lane, Alta Loma Voting Precinct ( Comprising regular electioa precincts 18, 19, 54) Palling Place: 'lta Laguna Mobile Home Park, 10210 Baseline Ave., Alta Ion Inspector: Kathryn Pearson, 9998 Monte Vista, Alta , = Judge Avdrdy Zimncrra.., 102210 Baseline, 0214, Alta Loma Judge: Stella Encioae, 10350 Baseline, 012, Alta Low Voting lreclnct 10 (Comprising regular election, precincts 21, 239 301 31) Polling Place: Etivanda School, 6925 Etivnnda Avenue, Etivcada Inspector: Carol Lombardo, 13041 Piano, Etivanda Judge: Isla McDonald, 13006 LalTera, Etivanda Judge: Constance Bredlau, 13040 Pima, Etivanda Voting Precinct 11 (Comprlatag regular election precincts 24, 25, 40, 50, 51) Polling Place Heighbarheod Center, 9791 A=w Eoute, Cucamonga Inspector: Judge: Phyllis Dom, 9561 Edelvelos, Cucamonga Judge: Philip C.nfer, 8671 Willow, Cucamonga Voting Precic,.c 12 (Comprising regular election precincts 48, 49) Polling Place: Dona Merced School, 10333 Palo Altr Street, Cucamonga Inspector: Earbara Maxfield, 10176 Nonrick, Cucamonga Judges Lillian Connolly, 10269 Dorset, Cucamonga Judge: Judith Hill, 9553 Hampshire, Cucamonga Voti. -g Precinct 13 (Comprising regular election precincts 45, 47) Poll lug Place: Central School, 7955 Archibald Avenuo, Cucamonga 7ns,.•ctor: Lillian Hovey, 9798 Hampshire, Cueanong'. Judge: Nyla Clover, 7515 Burgundy, Cucamonga Judge: Rebecca Hatch. 1515 Eurgandy yJ, 7 ,�.JYYp �jw" � ".N .`Y Vf '4• _ .. 'r _..t,iv .K1'Sxa(i: gpga 3 • , Voting Precinct 14 (Comprising regular election precincts 42, 43, 44) Polling Place: Cucam3nga Intermediate School, 7611 Hellman, Cucamonga Inspector: Barbara Cakle, 9630 San Bernardino Road, Cucamonga Judge: Muy Warda, 9673 San Bernardino, Oi_amonga Judge: Louise Wade, 9674 Bales, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 15 (Comprising regular election precincts 34, 41) Polling Piacet Licr2 Perk Cemsunity Building. 9161 Baseline, Cucamonga Inspectort Bobbie Essig, $632 Ramona• Cucamonga MR,: Jackie Thompson, 9599 Apricot, Alta Loma Judget Jacquelyn Ltw1e, 9100 Hemlock, Cucamonga Voting Precinct 16 (Comprising regular election precincts 11, 32 33, 35, 36) Polling Place: Valle Vista School, 7727 Valle Vista, Cucamonga Inspector: Virginia Mathahs, 7822 Alta Cuesta, Cicamougs Judge: Sally Hettle, 7723 Calla Casino, Cucamonga Judge: Mary Robinson, 7444 Via Salaipuedes V ,sting Precinct 17 (Comprising regular election pr _cts 37, 38) Polling Places Hubbs Residence, 8432 Arrow Route, Cucamonga Inspector: Judith Hubbs• 8432 Arrov Routes Cucamonga Judge: Judy Erickson, 8438 Arrow Route, Cucamonga Judge: Helen Boa:, 8651 Foothill, Sp. 14, Cucamonga Voting ' -eclnct 18 (Comprising regular election precincts 39, 46 Polling Place: Green Residence, 8227 Layton, Cucamonga Inspector: Patricia Green, 8227 Layton• Cucamonga Judge: Joan Hillo, 6278 Jadeite Cucamonga Judge: Voting Precinct 19 (Comprising regular election precincts 22, 26, 27, 28, 29 Po)1Log Places None SECTION 2. That the compensation of the pare," herelnbefore mead as •necinct board amrs is hereby fixed at the sum of $40.00 for each Inspector and where0afcbnrgo in made,ashalldbe election. of $30 rntal -60 foroeaid each of h polling places election, SECTION 3. That the City Clark shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall eater the same is tl.e book of original Resolutions of _ said City; and shall make a minute of passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of the City Council of said City, in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. ATTEST: PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON • 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSE`17: ) n Anrhn Cucamonga 1E' 1•. L K '•' I REOEVELOPNENT AGENCY AGENDA February 17. 1982 1. CALL IO ORDER. Roll Call: Frost, Mikels_, Palombo Bridge_, and Schlosser Approval of Minutes: January 6, 1982. 2. 'STAFF REPORTS. A. ADOPTION OF A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR n F. REOEVELOPMENr E C report y aure n asserman. B APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH NEST END RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT. to report y uren asserman. L. APPROVAL OF I.GREENFNT WITN CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRiCI. Staff report y Lauren asserman. —D. F4 cLc.cv Srnrrtf fF b.,.. r. w--+t, 3. ADJOURNMENT. a �1� RANCHO CUCA` ONGA REDEVELOPMERT AGENCY MINUTTS January 6, 1982 1. CALL TO ORDER. • A meting of the Radavelopmnt Agency was hold 1®ediately following the January 6, 1982 city council meeting. The Agency meeting was called no order at 9:56 p.m. by Chairmen Phillip D. Schlosser Present were: Agency members Jame C Frost, Jon D. Mikels, Michael- A. Palumbo, Arthur N. Bridge, and Chairmn Phillip D. Schlosser Also present were: Executive Director, Lauren N. Wasserman; legal Counsel, John Brown; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; and Finance Director. Harry Empey. Approval of Minutes of November 4 and November 18, 1981, Mo6lon: Moved by Hikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the minutes. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. — 2. CONSE1rr CALENDAR. a. The Rancho Cuca�cppnnga Radovelc.• -nt Agency received a copy 3f Resoluc:on No 81 -12 -2 by the Clno Basin Municipal Water District which e. presses their desire to continue negotiations with the Redevelopment Agency on :he pass - through of all tax revenues attributable to the Rancho Redevelopment '- reject Area to which CBMWD would hevo been entitled had said area not been located ih a redevelopment project area. } • Recommondation: It Is recommnded that the Redevelopment Agency receive and :y file said document. Y Notions Moved by .`llkcle, seconded by Palumbo to approve the Consent Calendar. A��A' Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5. STAFF REPORTS. — - 3A. REQUEST BY THE AGENCY TREASURER FOR A LOAN. Staff report by Harry Dopey. • Chairman Schlosser opened the meting for public input There being none, the public portion of the meting was closed. The Agency asked Mr. Fmpey how he would be investing the money in order to draw the, mat Interest possible. Discussion followed as to whether the funds should remain with the city or be transferred to the Agency Mr Empay assured the Agency that when the resolution coma heck from Council, it would include some statement of investing to the Agency. Notion: Maven by Hikels, seconded by Palombn to approve Resolution No. RA62 -1 and to valve the entire wading Motion carried unanimusly 5-0 Secretary wnsnermon read the title of Resolution No. RA 82 -1. RESOLUTION NO. RA82 -1 A RESOLUTION OF ThE RANCHO CUCnMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL LOAN FROM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 4. AWOURNMENT. Motion: Moved Sy Mikels, aeconded by Palumbo to adjourn to an executive session of the city council not to reconvene. Motion carried unanimusly 5 -0. The meting adjourned at 10:15 m. Reepeetfu117 submitted. Beverly Authelet ,ry, „ ,La Assintant Secrets" �:? ' CITY OF PANCIIO CUCAMONCA MEMORANDUM° +� February 12, 1 982 o s tsn M: City Council .3 Y None of the Redevelopment items had been received from the attorniey at the 55 time the agenda %as prepared. Items will be delivered to you before the S meeting. 3 i z :i 1 i t •. 4f >Y;"1�.'tvid�'.'si`_•.. iiE A. . 3`FS ✓��� •,:`