HomeMy WebLinkAbout1983/01/05 - Agenda PacketO,yam tfp ^C
u
71
I�rr
Crr,- OF
wuNaJD CIXAN )NUk
CfFY COUN IL
AGENrP.
Lions Park Community `.,nee.
916: Base Lino Road
Rancho Cucaronga, California
January 5, 1983 _ 7:30 p.m.
111 iteci subaittad for the w.=-yU 14anda suet to in writing. The deadline
for autatting these Steno is '.:JO P.M. on tba Mmimaday prior to :.he mootW• The
City Clerk's Offico receives all ouch items.
1. CALL TO ORD'LR
A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag
B. 101: Call: Dahl Buquet_, Frost .
O
Schlosser. end
C. Approval of Minutes: None aubaittec.
2. AHIKMCECIWrS K
a. Thursday, January 6, 7:00 p.m., HISTORICAL
COMUSSI)N, Lions Park Coctunity Center.
h. Monday, January 10, 7:00 p.m., FOOTHILL FIILT
DISTRIC7 BOARD OF DIRECTO6.a MELTING, Lions Park
Community Carter.
o. Wednesday, January 12, 6 :30 p.m., PLAIOURO
COMMISSION, Lion Park Ccmmunity Center. Special
slide presentation by Lowls Cocpany on Terra Vista.
i
d. Thursday, Januar/ 200 7:00 p.m., PARKS ADV130RT
CC;I MITTEE, Lions Park Comunity Center.
3. COn MT CALrMDAR
i rqr - --
91 Ths following Consent Calendar Stets are expected to be
-q, routine wad non- controverala.. TWy will be acted upra by
z, the Council at one time witha,t discussion.
2
City Council Agenda 2 January ;, 1983
a. Approval of Warrants, Register No. 83 -1 -5, in the Amount 1
or $268049.63 -
b. Approval of Warrants for ASOC33ment Dlatrict 82 -1, dated 4
September 1982, In the amour of $863,579.01. -"
0. Approval of Warrants for As. •ssment District 82 -1 dated 6
October 1982, In the amount of $7,451,085.43.
d. Approval of Warrants for Assosvment District 82 -1 dated
November 1982 in the amount of 0152,045.30.
e. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Larry D. and Area
Chapman, Larry's Playhouse, 8890 Eighth Street for on
Sale beer and wine public promises application.
f. )t Is recommended that $265,702.95 from tno Systems Fund
be ,uca to secure the upfront 003-3 of the Vineyard
A�•nue Street Improvement Project, C Federal Aid Urban
Project. The funds will be roplacod upon PAU
relmb4r3ement to the City.
e g. Trent 9434: Approval of AgreoDint and Faithful
Performance Bond to replace Cartif_cate of Deposit
ruDmltted by Haven Land and Dovelopment Co.
PLloase Certificate of Deposit... ..$5,000
RESOLUTION 110. 83 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCnO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AGREEMENT AND FAITHr11L PERFORP.INCE BOND
SUBMITTED BY HAVEN LAND AND :EVELOPMENT
^.OMPANY.
h. Parcel Map 5792: Approval of Improvement Extension
Agraoment - Lowi• Properties, Inc., located west of
Archibald Avenue, :.orth of Base Lino Bond.
RESOLUTION N0. 03 -2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF INC CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEPENT AND
IMPRUVFHENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAI' 5792.
W
7
10
11
13
21
22
,
City Counall Agenda 3 January 5, 1983
1
1. Approval of North Town Pha3c III Project. It is
recommended that the City Cout011 accept the new
Smprovoments Into the City Maintenunce System, authorize
final payment of $28,283.84 to the City's contractor,
American Construction, (an additional :4,311.21 to be
held In retention u -It11 release of the Labor Lnd
Material bond) authorize the city olerk to release the
faithful performance ..and, and authcrize the filing of a
Notice of Completion.
Reloaae Faithful Perforsanoo Bond ...... $78,986 05
RESOLUTION N 8a -3
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1'Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO MCAIWNGA, C4LI,`ORNIA, ACCEPTINL
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR NORTH TOWN PHASE
III AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF 4 NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE HORS.
J. Director Review 81 -24: Accepting public improvement3,
authorizing release of Faithful Perforwnoo Bond, and
authorizing fili.,g cf Noting of Completion - Takai of
Am.rlca, Ina.
Release Faithful, Performance Bond ...... $9,400.00
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -4
A RCSOLUTICN 01' TH2 CIn COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCIHONOA, .;ALIF09NIA, ACCEPTING
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS For DIRECTOR NEVIEW
81 -24 (TOAAI C' AMERICA, II;C), AN;)
AUTHORSZIIIG TdE FIL,;UU OF A NOT-Z 0?
C014PLETIOII kOR THE WONT.
�• -11 -ion of Underground Ur.111ty District No. 1 along
Arehlua -d e,,, , rram Fetthili Boulevard to C1,uroh
Street and setting of pu.111c hearing date Of February
16. 1983.
.-w.. hE3GLUTION N). 83 -5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUC%MONOA, CALIFORNIA, CA„LING FOR
A PUBLIC HEAhINO TO DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC
NECESSITY. IIEILTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE REQUIRFS
THE FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY DIS.RI .,T
NO. 1 ALONG ARCHTBALD AVENUE FROM FOOTHI.L
_ BOULEVARD TO ;HURCH STREET.
R
2a
30
32
34
City Council Agenda
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -6
OF R LCNO • COP��AA�� E CI�YICAI,IFOflN POE
R;1 J
UT
UNDEROR N UTSLY7Y PISTBI�'1`0}} NANO
'If
A ENUE FROM MTdILL ibULEVARD -13
CNIIRCH STR
1. Approval of c,.lsultant contract with Don Owen and
Aasooiatea as Assessment Engineer and Drown and hazarek
as Bond Counsel for the Alta Loma Channel Aasoasmont
DS•trict, A3sessment District 82 -2.
January 5, 1983
3,
m. Approval of a Resolution declaring ELiwanda Cairns as an 4J
h13tor.al Landmark. The Hiatoric Pronervatlon
Commisalon has recommended that the Etiwanda valr,ia be
designated a City Hintorie Landmark.
RdSOLUTION NO. 83 -7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAulFOP.NIA, PECOONIZINO
THE ETINANDA CAIRNS AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC
FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND
THEREPORF DESIONATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDHARK.
43
n. Approval of Carnolian Street Improvement Project 44
Contract Change Order No. 3 (CCO Y3), and approval of
appropriation of an additional $28,600 expenditure ninoe
the amount exceeds the current 10% contingonoy of
$14,471.28 to cover the change order.
o. Set January 19, .1983 for public hearing for Appeal of
Planning Commission decision for Tentative Tract 12242 -
Hughes. Appeal of Planning Commission decision
requiring a Focused Environmental Impact Report for a
residential tract eubdlvi3ion of 18 lots on 4.96 acres
of lend in the R -1 -8,500 (aingle family residential)
zone to be located on the east uido of Sapphire Street,
south of Highland Avenue - APN IL1- 212 -16.
p. SOL January 19, 1983 for public tearing for
Environmental A!eessment and Platned Devalcpmrnt 82-
05/Yontativo Trrot 12305 - Roy. A change or zone from
R -3 (multiple family residential) to R -3 /P (rwltlple
family rasidential /planned dovelcpment) fur the
developm,,nt of 59 condominium units on 5.24 acres of
land located north of 19th Street, cast of Hellman
aAvenue - APN 201 - 232 -34 and 54.
City Council Agonda 5 January 5, 1903
*4. P17J'.IC BEAAINOS
A- ERV'RCNME3'TAL ASSESSMENT AND 24NE CHANCE 82-0
BIDcm Awhango of zone from 7-1 single family
residential) to R -3 (multiple family residential)
for 2.02 acres of land located on the west aide of
Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street - APN
202 - 131 -61 and 62. Staff report by Rick Narks,
Associate Planner.
ORDINANCE NO. 187 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNOA, CALIFORNIA,
REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL HUMBER 202-
131-61 AND 62, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE
OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF MONTE
VISTA STDEET FEW R -1 TO R -3,
5. CITY MANAGBN'S STAFF REPORTS
QA. RETISED CONTRACT FOB INLAND MEDIATION BOARD Staff
report by Rlak Narks, Asaooiato Planner.
The Hest End Mediation Board 1e requesting the City
to terminate its ekiatlng Contract with them and
enter a new consortium with the County and City of
San Bernardino. The proposed contract also
Pr3vidos for an additional jPigof Block Grant
money for the Mediation Board.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -8
CJ4- A RESOLUTPOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TtX
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
APPRIVINJ A CONTRACT BEIIIUES THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONLA,7118 COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, THE CITE OF SAN BENHARDIhO,
AND INLAND MEDIATION BOARD A NON - PROFIT
OROAEIZATION, FOR nAPOSES OF
ESTABLISHING A CONTRACTUdAL ARRANGEMENT
PHf,V1DIN0 FOR A FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM TO
RESIDENTS 01' THE ;ITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA.
0. ROUTE 30 IMPLCMEHTATION P1 AN PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT R00. 0nd approval of agrecmont with
the San Bernavotno Associated Governments to
�� ooitribute $20,C3D toward preparation of tho Route
30 Implementation ?lav Staff report by Lloyd
Huhba, city engineer.
46
48
49
51
61
Is
City Council Agenda
6
D. iiPPROVAL _ 07 BESOLUTIOMS ESTABLISHING PARKS
t'ORNULI K— reeolutione eatablieh Population
deneltios per duelling unity type and parklao
development ovate per acre, as formula compononts
for dotormining amou& of land dadioatlon, or too
to -lieu of, or a oombiaftion of both.
Staff recommonds tho adoption of the "Fe factor as
slnted in the Peaolution and adoptb)n of the "De
faltor of 060,000 per acre as a rid -point of perk
du%clopment coat per acre an reflected by a _maury
of the public /Privnto sectors engaged in park
design and ocnatruotion. Staff report by Bill
Holley, Co ®untty Services Director,
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -9
A =vq0LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 01' THE
CITY OF RANCH) CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING PMAOE COS1 PEA ACRE TO
DEVELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAHONOA.
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMOHUA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
POPULATION PER DWELLING UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE
OF IMPLEMENTING CHAPTER 16.32 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIIIG TO THE DED'_CATION OF
PARK AND RECREATION LAND.
6. .:ITT ATTORNEY'S REPORTS ��uf
7. COUNCIL BUSINLis —,w "
B. ADJOUR10MT
January S, 1983
91
93
94
rwu + +DUUiwuDL wunan>��n^NM1UnooD +>wu wnMnD +rYDM, �uurwnnDD«ooW ... �
uaaao��uoununi aD `a+Y YP ^PDNDDa +.+uo.��anu aur.........M11.J
` I� +YCWn ��V +�n� nw`11. M ^YM J✓nNV.Ya00�vw ONM1J MY Yt1yWNw�+ONN N.. n Yip ..
.Y 4 M:N NIV ^V YIYV>I�OnY MY iNadYN VPV =W� IV ^: N P
O 1
s I
°N I
. S
S 1
z
r SW
W K
J °
2
�� IW
� I
W
W 6 W yN h j y i
Q �• y LL
z %� `N .0 ->'7 � u sY.Ni i<• un' riiv� o LN a :i
V FrJ�ru tVnaJpc __OYVL9 V.YY� 6\6 6 VFW n..
° y �,.- °t W20y1.N R= 'J JL4YLN \Vr V NnrWi O Vr p
HE^Lr rV�.cr \JVrQ LS Oar- N UYaVr a0 .2 -.Ci6•
V VN.V V.<upu JnWrYN V 6JWQ n.. \V \^VVpY =YW 1 r t V 6V6YQU/N_\ u
O u 6VlV \ii\ nr VQ\�= NUV.)i -`i�lV CIIVyVrVryp�rN °J yJQ6 4
M1 � C °yn y �VtIIV ^nVYpuiY ��NU�V�iV° rrnnr u JvV1V ONUUC VW..
e �V +Q V.IP W =N� y✓� U�. ON LpZpw�'V��Y u> GurJ r ^nl ry lWJV ..y =V6
.1 W 7r \✓ry Jr} uSN Vn NOp Sv�WWU> OW�r= �.DacY u
t% jVi >V LI[s r ^u.0 Wrrr1
1 i .\ir.�i O.Vi�i `�1r-��w YWUU\�ur S.C2n >tnauL.!>ul ^LWY .yVV1.�iY6�un�Qp ¢n GR^V�
\frWrr;)>I----------6r-r\--
LI »2<Y<Ji ppp \6f QQVR6 {6NNNMVINNN yµ yw.nr rnrV >L >TSYVy\
ail � OnN ^J�.O�wP JO.�VI1- rnn✓Yn.�O.•O PI10✓On Un MOLNNP000VNNDPay OI�VnM)OnVhP4D
L JrpuYV -JU N+IN- n r.. V.. IOVnI..r NJYVWYJrnrr�.nfnM Ya.N ^YY yhVNNOn
> T Y V4Yw�nwnn ^nM1n n.V. n..Vw wwwruwWW°rW�iY�y� 'n PLUVOWWO ^r rr uun-rNna PY.VV
F VWTIrW r W V yrWOWWYYYV✓V'✓Y ✓V!
VN OPO- y..YPYw4�V-NA+NO.�C pOrNw.I.. Jr OPV�Nn+nVM1OpOr..nYV Vw OVO -Nn IN MOpp
I( MNO\°WO> pPppPPPPVVO0000{.p C00-- rnrrrr -r N.�NNNNhryN M/�nrM n.Nnn nt.
�� PYVVPPV✓VVaVNVPPPVVPV: OOVVOt�.ID VOV 4 .)OGVOVODOCVV000UVVO0000'JOVOVO
I S 2 .... +wV'.. . Vin�1.+.. Ji. Ji��� .Vi�r.•'rn..�..Yrr�rrrn-�wM1_w rn M1ww nn=
•I�Y w w w w w r w w rM1P Nw �w M1 w M1w�- ..- r.....�r -rrr -- r..., ' .._.
� n n n �p � �1 • w i
l
U.WW ................. tlPn. Vr.Mm WYn.iV ON VG J1.VrY V.e VIMJVVVVVnFpOUV WIJV Wp
V WiurOY ;A O A{YrV O pyNnynN pVPYYY Or NIV .p NNyNO.YOVV .. n V J O Y OM1OJAOrWJ
p V�rO^rpyYyOOUV N.pnp NVVVrgOVNrVrPAO MnONJO r. yRVNY _.yOFnAJOA.n VIF�NOVOINCUUNnVI
V wN ni= = FnrVNNNV.,�Vnnp VNy YJtru1V NNVA
P^ A wM�M IJ. YYVnVNYIIIM
L ..r nq NQ.rO WIryV YGI N :O O NO :NON I{ ryN ry : IP V_AY.ry
mA Ir{ N A F N A N rrr r O AN N N F
VI V
i
O w
\ P
N
O
i
yJ V <
Y .yyCaJ
V �•Y
W s
i
asa'I
iu
W J M W FF Y
1 V(i u V
„ V I uV� W YW Y V 6 Lri Y Y h u f i V fJN
l =%J N NL_ y4i JY Y VV VVi4 �W =RV' i Fl F N)V ql }r Y WYE CY
YY W1 fL
Y r: Z1
nN u.. i. aV..
WV4 u M Nv VUr t nnYr F. V WIr �•i< Uf rV Y 'ir]q rye
V WY`C = l urtl JVYfYN > rV♦ 1 F J r V4 6 q YrVrpn
pJU <YhYr'Ygp =VrNq Fnq .1N1]�<Oyw 0^ L]W
Y fRI rit N /YJ�]lrrr W }NVyN >rq(Y = :uuJ(6 Ui0 Y W ^RV Y09 }
w yrpjyV irl u_J r6YgYYlr y.l �Y rJ :Or4l VVJD nWY'n V__W (u.. 1.IVR W�u <�V� pt[�
u r_ r:un rwrN; \rY n< rr J Yyy Yn, W ..} Lr. lrVruq V'J q.1_V <W
Y =r r< 61VVgpL<(WY:}JJ Lr yy` VJ (U \]4VYV W r= Y— =wY ia/Nr =W /( =vNYYY
l \ \Wrn =-uj Vj Lr(lrtl(gV; n� W Ylwu;r
4 =a Y(WJ�ir yJgYYVJ J �W / \/Y WVV .Y.V JYI q C 1 \Y >_n�
Vrn sq C((( JJ W^ <(rV
U NN Y(q 4q G<rt • 6V6yV WYU6VVN4i: ` O'JOi \ <qVn W_N
V W NO Yrrn \L �`On lYU�iVY <n 64J1 inn)1RWr 1 Wr iJW.n•
> YurWr_.. Y(; =ILOr qFi} \lLR<ni( \lgl_urrnWVYIJ Nr. rJ< r v,<YWJ +u9
VYa<1rYV \L % >VWN)J VN�1rYNrJt•Wiy LllgW JrY Ii N.+�Y 2iY J7 tl_
' VJR•<iq Jym< UfW2ruUOVJUYY]y »>nr{V �VyW(� y {J�J gEII GD
�ll1Y \IIOOOgpgm VV'fyJVWVJUJVJ WVJJ <000J O'JO.LrY Y{)V [tS�L�`Nnrrr9 NY1r{Y %Y.1
pO7 VJONnYYNprVrONOOVNY4yNp4NnONNNOYOVONYNr _OPOC4GVANN I�nNrPrOr hnVt{W /,YNVIgYU.1
^±'V) =N�..n W1YYYwwYYYYy 4r_.^nRVJVOrnpYYVVJ.�V NI, �.- ..YO_L rIGV U04uIwV
/ > 11VUOVV \IV�nw n•��rr rNFM.,FNr\.NM1NY)NNNN ni��r�Nry YNNn��nVJJJYYYYPMV N
+ V YIVIVIIINA N /,V VWUdVVV
Md..q PO�NN INVFDP_ Y_ frAlNdnVPU_ NnINdrYOY _NAINVrYVJ�Nn11NOVYpO�NA1N MpVOnitnlrYF
Fr ' OJ040Ur_rr r NN......... MnAAnMJJVVfJ.IVV)NNn1.A NNNnnVJOOdVJ000FNFw Nr.NN
VV PP DV PVYVV4PPPPDOPPMVVVVYPV PPVY PDYDPYY PPP V PPPVP-- VPPVYVVJPVJTDVYVPVD >DppP
wnd,. .. n .r _ _r. r.. r____CVOOVJV _i YUdOd O_OddKVOd00
u
6
F i O+=ry'hw a. 0 3. « M V 0r /0.a1.r0 0O ri �Wa; O Pa rNYJ0nM1l0 VOn,n0YV.N r.0 y00U.W y- MFVw^soul
9
.p
• o
F
u
N N
9 r
\ O
V
n
_M
N
J
<
F ,LL
• � w
.plZ•l
Y �
W �
6
a
r
s
a,y, omcgmmN"'aromo o:..q"'mo aw:�mm."'"ywn yu�e"'y.,
r oyJ PaPnn..nnn.w n..- .nw�nnrwuWUu
<G OpUgDOOrrrrrr yrrrrNNNrr r..r nnnnnn
MNMYM1M1r� tirF �rM1 nn�-Y\�ry m^M�rM1.\V M \nh.\�.
W N z s �,uyr n
t i f Vr L VJJ<YLL S
V =VL m ryVy 00 iZ — U2 { {<l
m ymr2� N �V >�L ��uii0 CY2i>rY \-O
V V4W VYw-Js ui�.OyYLruw r.r 'IYmOr =rryY f
V V '.•IS..OQ <LVU< 1Z ^- JVJy6L -Y Jf 2:JJJ F
Z u U ViLLUir'Y C.V[V.r�Ni. rrr
F W :-� :: Wq : ^rLLVJ`nyyi♦rf� ".N N
.IJCWJU LLmr_V,{ SJ+1Y11 4
Z ri UVr rViV Vy1r pJ6mi6
� > NJ9VWOmS_OeLrL W.i22 �qa m- .V_ =VVLLw
'� �. ii :mn�ir�omsor000PgroNnaoocq
�4 W +. LN_N +nr rmmFnnnnr_r
= J YI- I- n�PirVw Y4Vn 'V'•r L +. rn__mVW.rW,Clq j
V
,[ a_YPOr Yn.M.rr nPOrnn.NO q�n_O_CN^.n
F S )M,n^NJapaa0aa0a__. -_rr r�ypDg000VCOS
a r .y ^nnn.� -.n..n nnnnnnoumvvoaonou
m 3 OCR` ^04�•^VO� r0= ^r00 =n O�Ory =rO aa�00000
� r� PPOPP
l
J
• 0' • �L G L L L • 0 C l l l l l 4 O t l ♦ ♦
N
m
T
O
HI •MO a 10/1 0 T ul N 00 0 o O o b
� (J p1 b S p1 N n O
S h h
V1 OO N Y1 .T p1 O N .T m
6• � '� p•1 T (O O N
_h V1 b
�1
FI S T p1 v (p T 01 p•1 T
fO U M 1 M ry N I'"1 N N '•1 N N J
ti N N N N N N N N N H M M M M M
W 4 L C CC CC
• � � N y p
N
O( 3 -N N _V N - _ _ _ _ _ V •N
W - _ _ _U •N y
Q� y, V V LL O 1C� l Q ' •2 1]J ] •]
(L W Q 4 N Q a N Q VI a Q Q
C VI
6 N T �' •• T A - _
a G v o o
N 0
o a
o n
V P%J OI OI ` � p1 11 C1 • � " U L L L %
a m ¢ rc c u
0
a O' N G• W � H
� N
C) ��
1�-
u
WL
w _ � O � W 2 O O 6 W J J 3 � p• O K
'"1 2 O V L' O F W Y (L S J O • J 6' V LL � O
O J lL 2 r CJ O O J V y'N JQ N O O '2.1 O
L.yl 6' W 6' � � 3 W "J, 6' W n W 1� F O li p![ QyL V � F• W
O � r V IU W O 1 SOW WWr J2 Y O 'V W Y
qS Qh
W Q V V V W 4 J O � G w� 0 0 a Q� u p• V p � yJ
a
u
o
� n• M .T 1I1 "p I� N T �
Y
U
G'
K
- W - (p - - N N N N N N
r WI O O O \ \ \ \ \ \
• ~ p � ^ M M \ \ \ \ M O O O C m O
T T T Ol T \ \ \ \ \ \
+ T T T T T T
N
m
O�
O N
O
O
O
4 O
M
a
O
3
m
N
N
�
N
N
�
1
1
Ck
a
a
¢ s
uN
v. -
�
N
N
V
W
c
u
u
U
Y
N
(Y N
✓�
U
N
_
C
C
O
G
YN
N
?
Y
W
V.
a
a`
6
0
_c
u
N
V
O J
N
N
Q O
N
C 6
O O
O J J
2 J J
i 3 3
Q
V
O eyl
H
J 3
u Z n as
x j
y_u
d
N N
m
1- O
;0
CITY Of
AAIYNO CU(AMmGA
VAtAANT 19CJSTIA
41tCSS49AI olffAlCT $1.1
'CCT $)1I
CA"
VMRANT ,
Y(OOt
KTIYIr1
10/1 ,31
119
IOCTNIII IVIt /IU2t VT PAtN
InxtLn.11t
At �
10 /1 /'S
130
/OOrNlll INL /PNptar OANA
Sty( -IL
4 9 37-99
SM0
3 a.3,oP
IO.Q /43
tit
/OBIM .- a0ACA4[NT 4tx[
Co InyKt..nt
47.1799
y47•f9
)1.{)
AY
4,1C],000,00
WWI
11]
rCOTVILL (VD[PINOto SA.[
ArIn01
y13.9Y
1014/42
127
CI11 01 RANCHO CUCWNCA
4D.T.Vnt 0/ Io1n
l .
9 77.44
59.000.00
I
10 /SA1
Iii
gAONN S MIAA(A
119.1 Aeplp sl-q
49.27•IO
15.403.44
31.935.Se
1011442
125
RITZ (AA(AA
nlin[Irq A wscw1 .
4} -13•t7
4).7f
loll //2
116
U. S. IOSTNfiR
r"'A91
49.21•27
144.71
10/10/11
117
TITLE INSURAA(L L Twsr
.19111 a,-., A01.111tl.-
49 -23.29
201,307.D4
10110/42
127Y
TITLE IRSYIANCE c TWST
I 0101 CN(LN
49-23-29
IS01
10/10/01
tit
TITLC INSURANCE t TYJST
IIIgNt -.fvt7 .Wviq[lo,
41..21 -29
.307.CD)
201,307.00
10112,32
129
CITY OF "New Cucw rA
I11n•I-q A D lfckllm,
4y13.23
3.20
10/12 /0:
1.1
STATIOa(4'S LOAIpRAT1pN
(OV'D.Int
41•13•11
1,025.70
10 /Wa2
131
RITZ CM("
Dr LI•Inq C IJ.ttu[1mR
49.27-23
45• 69
10/:4/02
172
IT / 1
cow,,., L,.I .At
4943.44
23.590.40
10 /gA-
:D3
CITY of OWMIO
W-rncl 4.1vIK
4 }-23.24
7. {3341
10 /IS /G3
174
MVAJY L40 AO(t(lOM[Xr
C-nVxt %.1,,.
1} -7744
4,100.0
Ions ,32
135
. C LANG CO
C0 -trxl 41rtra
49-27.24
307.744.94
1' /J01112
'36
IIATCfl ItelosrM
CP CrK1 4rvlp
49.1341
{30.00
10/10/42
134
s N. NOR LINSIA
aq J~t
I9 -23-44
11.71
10R 1/02
Itt
NINA N40AU
Nlpta f ,, ttWbillun
49 -7749
12,019.00
Ion1182
179
AANCkO AATEN A$W
RlgAlrofyty 1c 11I11m
W23-39
30,410.0
10/21/37
140
YOIOLD
,3010[0
I0111 182
141
fOATANA ART A%W. INC.
WE" SvJDll"
" -2344
•y
2a5.39
10 12t /72
111
vIL W44 IlfOC.
CD -11x1 so'k.
49.11-21
1 2SS to
10/75/12
34;
AIT., CJ"1u
111 -11-1 s pW Jtalioel
49 -73-2)
.
10/:f/87
144
CAWORAIA IcDIAL SAYINGS
I- y.Llr -t
49 -27.77
250.000.110
1
lO
CITE W tAYWD CUCAAOIKA
LSURAa( RtG1S
+IR
19. 7
ASS[SWO DISIAICT
81-1
OCT
pg. S }1J
D.aT[
V4A.IR /
VENDOR
Act OMT I
A"-Y
10/25/32
14S
CALI1091A frofUl S%VIW%
.a,Ml..n[
{9.23 -77
f ZS0.000.00
101254.
Iµ
CLIPAWU FW"L SAVIWS
Inutl.mt
49.7)•77
10115182
147
[LI /•IA14 fCD(RAl SAYING:
2fC,DC0.00
10 /JI /a2
4
snHMl
4943.77
250, WO.W
'
IO /10/01
(4W.tNA4'.;tAH- 1 {
CmvKl 411 it.
49.23.21
9{4,4I{.09
UCV
nIcN b A. 'KRCOIT.
VOI OtD
/L'(NL111 n•ttOI I-
4r13 -J9
(1}9.IZi.to)
�I•
IITIM C. .*,I
..
L•
IV s t cats
tDA(t1 S. NARti V. •CA
n
IarAI / Llfwl
1y
11 ;S44J LAa
911 CL.SS Lt
K y
Otrwo
![
L
torus S
1.44. :55.41
1
N
m
T
m N V \•r •O n O O O- N 0 0 0 M YOj p M
O � O •Y YI Y' N •Q N M T Q^ (� M^ O YI m-
W ? O M m n In N �. R M ry Il• 1� N N I•N\ O O I� T O• m �O v
� N
N
1 N
mN ? 01 N M 4 OI d S? M ry ry N N N N N r g q N N R v d ry>
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 ^ I 1 1 ^ 1 ^
V I1 M M I•I M M M M M M M M M M M M 1 M M 1n M M 1 M M
u N N ry ; N N N N N N N N N N lr N h N OI N N N N N N N
Q 04 O\ lA f•1 OI N 01 OI OI OI Ol Of P T O. OI N T 01 tT OI OI O\ OI 01 O\
°• °• i a' R d O .t R R R S d R R J S R R S S R J R R S J R •
W1�
N
J
� O �
W t O
6' 2 1 •
W [
G
W
N J p p p p O 4 N N O O Y J Y j j Y y
L• N U Y O .� 9l M O Y I` L
b G Y V Y O V
Y�� L O O •• M L u
V ~ O O O L e O O L O p C N C 6) 0 0 0 e 0 0 Y
w O' Y
C
Y Y
O r'
a0.
e e V
K 44E N N y >
O w• N Y CO L O y N Y O O O J W
Qy e O O O L L p pl tG0 O a L O
O Y a C q 1 L W W= N N Y< V U C U U U p
L M ✓
U L Y U O O uLy O O O b O L 1m N C L tl b N N
it o N u C Y u E i O u .L.� 1- b o= L y u 0 9 L �• N Q "�
5 2 1 - y= g Y 9 T �• l
� 6' S 6 0 0 0 6 Y. n 6 Q a l'• 1• N G' N V Cj O 1.1 N N N
U c a N N •D I. m OI O . N M 9 \ •D n m M N Ol r
W ¢p' .� _ _ _ _ N V. N N N N H •O V •O •O ^ •O •D •O � •� n
U
• � N N N N N N N N N N N
N N N N N N N f\
o m m m m m m m m m m m arvo \ m m m m m m m m m m m m m
- ^
i
R
5 a,
W
U>IIfATgN IOR A1C0110{!C 41V11A01 IKIN31:11
t« [•prryXX d A4.44 M•«.q r«".1
:+of«...�c.11.11111 "1 Corrar'1u.]
rw.,A..IwA«..r .lrf.r lrh•••• ••u•r.•
IWAI01 W AIIIICAIOIN
C"lt:LL':, tAM' 7. G Ara
G
A XV V•M IY.. rY.Yy.Ir.y.."n.y iin py.
W�YINSt ll 11.[ Np,,
t2 «277
iwtr f.c ]mu
] mNV of TIANIAC00.53) lee
11L
m1
rer. Tof. A53.r/J
42
sxtllo M to 12 100.00
ry VpEOSttlEO
A Wrl'MO f•Iayl.ouno C. 31 -n OADMIN15ianoN
dr+
R W. Al wX,.« -Iw« w u ^' OEC 101982
OL90 sicmh :t. —�.y91 Ip111R1014
r'(wlld'..:oq;o 91730 Sob : do SS To & '250.413
13 STATE 01 CAIVJIgA CwwM M :..u. f °ns�'nno p.N I %•B.U2
I r w•... r ..r...._ +......y. r....•an ....w X. y X r w. r r r .yr... «.- _
...• •I ^• ww 4 Y•ri. •..q.r Y w.s w. w ..Y n. o.4n.. y Wr T .w w .•• rI h Y.
Y..ti4�"w M1•.". w.n. �r w 4 •w.ri.. W y� ±: r.+1 � w \�' Y In •.Y� .rHY • r..
M ..+•M n.ar w r r. w rh . w . �+. MM1 nN
A4.�wyi.•44 n•.r .I rw.�lAV .�nr.rr•�I•�-a� ^4 +. n•..4rn4f+...w�.w. y..Vw
14 AMKUR
�4 wit
LIZ
API ll"TION BY TRN�]1llROR� —__
R STATE Of CAJNOI4.A C., d •^x'x JainiP. no Oaw 1J•O.L.
�. w 1..••w • Y.••. N . W W t
.. y-I" yw. X11 u . • •.r r•. M Y
�. rn•••. .. rw M.•+w ~••IewrVµ ~ +Y h.••�M. �.r r
�� �� •+.. �u.w. w Ywr. 4n wI.•. I .Y. �n 4 w rrn Yru -Yr 4 •�
.. �•. u.Vww.r.r ••• 4 w.• w
.f NrA�I.I ILrv.f.l
11.�� �r C.CI��L
wI- L9�116
If I"'"'n.:J �.Iw ;W h..r ., 4wCl.•�Ir •. C�r rd l.V Cab
.. I . n �enrr
dr+
lLK,IV, -, R.I"r TLJbry Fn flrg4«.AT t'N
1 Iw..l. 1...: •1e1.r ..y 13 (. 07_cm 1:34671 _ .�,�
:`
I
i
/ \
�lAY1IwsAYAws
I G
I asao�
I ��nel�ia6
I AQe2
I
I
G
lei
r l
.
,lACANT-
�I
�J
V
Laud
845(ecer it, C'.r?L.m.rc r
8erweeU TAL"a Ca[Amw bA I
Aub O.rakjo
New I (ouoe'a
C4rr4cjkL Cuwne
Center � ,
I �LCMl�,
WeY's YLAVt(ousc Js LaeAreb
niD.trww%r CoRkwo- cF st 5TG[eT A•ro V IJCVAPD Avenue
IPeolkerY CueerrrL 9 tu.veb : .1 lj,;,veAL 5Rvjcte. YLA.0
GemzeAC ?i LAAJ ' .:rbW sr2 A'L
AWAeeur'aoYe2rtEs 14,ueDS
;' ,
eloerN / ss.r
EAST /.L5.P
(er✓ace
61MCiO)
tijar/.i 5 P.
Ge%YQAL J�au: AleeRtI6aue2AL TjausW1AC
EASr/Geue?AC -'r�4:1S7VM.
SouTd / Cen,mrec1AL (bTY. FD.urA�
uresr/ G,- nbvwzthL
IT
i
-0
CITY OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Dacember 13, 1982
TO: City Council
FBOH: Finance Direct
SUBJFC": FAD Project Financing
o>b,
WMQ ,
0 i C
o B a
>
Vineyard Avenue Street Improvement In a Federal Aid Urban
Project, (H /HR -8194 (2) ), which manna that the coars meet
be frontae, then PAU will reimburse after the fact Un-
fortunately, the General Fund, which to the fund that would
normally front the costs, is not in a position to do so at
this time. Therefore, it to lecommcadee that the Systems
Fund secure the upfront Tonto, and that $265,702 95 of Sys -
tams fund& be froron to meet the dmocd of the PAU project.
As FAU rnimburleo the City, a 11{.e amount of Syacros money
would be released to most the demands of that particular
Lund.
The Systenn Fund to the moat viable of the City funds to
meat this requirement. Current balance is 4676,707 with
lane than $1,000 in cutrent expenditures
LUE /wa
ld
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUN0A
STAFF REPORT
DATE January 5, 1983
I i9»
T0: City Council and City Mananger
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BI: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT AND FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE 80.10
TO REPLACE CERT11 :1ZATE OF DEPOSIT ($5,000) SUBMITTED
BY HAVEN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT CO IN CONNECTION HITS!
TRACT 9434
Haven Land and Development to submitted an agreement and Certifi-
•ate of Deposit in the amount of $5,006 in Say of 1980 to guarantee
,em,;-,al of a rataiting Nall located an the east s +de of Lot 32 of
their lrtrt No. 9434 This Nall is to be reproved at the time of
the developn,..•t of 'ract No. 11606 located on the east side of Tract
No 9434
At this time, Haven Land an' : evelopment Co. has submitted an agree-
ment and Faithful Performance 3ond in the amount of $5,000.0tt and
requested a release G• tte Cartificate of Deposit. The developer
of Tract No 11606 na: b„en ootieied of the change in security
RECI)MMENDATION
It is recommended that City Council adopt the attar.hed re :o'utlon
appr0vinq the agreement and Faithful Performance pond and authortze
the City Clerk !o release above described Certificate of Uepo;it
Respectfully submltt•J,
.
LBft^K:laa
Attachments
s
s�
el
TRACT 110, 9,01541
iN THE COUNTY OF SAM BERNARDINO
it
ell
"i�ry a�dry i'r'wr lua. ewoni.e°•w�w.v
y T,n�yA l -E � � ,�z �•�'r •
Iw. rr r� m �.. � ��i �� '•i.
o� ��' M1wr • t1
Tr J v ai D� i0 {fYYI i M •! 1Y1%)�, IN i�
il..: •'.`.'.2�i � 4�m~��lr�tiFY_•�'��"°�VVaa ,^.a s •� ' ° • P T �- e -
.^tie�tcl' ira j va av 'f w' es � ev •' au � � . •� vv
7
.fi
rr
6
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. APPROVING Ali AGREEMENT AND FAIThFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND SUGHITTAL BY HAVEN LAND AND DEVELOFMENT
COMPANY
VHEREAS, Haven Land & Development Company has submitted a Faithful
Performance Bond to replace a certificate of Deposit to guarantee removal of a
retaining vall constructed direc!ly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434.
HOST, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California, does accept said Agreement and Bond and
authorizes the City Clerk to release Certificate of Deposit No. 51- 303325
Issued by Valley Federal Savings to the City of Rancho Cucamonga in May 1980.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of January, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
—Sn . N ke -b� a s, Nayor —
ATTEST:
Laure,i M. Hasse n:an, try Clerk
0
.4�
`9
V
•x:
Aw-
November 30, 1582
Mr. Lloyd Hubbs
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Post Office Box 793
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Substitution of Faithful Performance Bond in
lieu of Certificate of Deposit
Pursuant to our recent conversations concerning our desire to substitute a
faithful performance bond for the $5,000 certificate of deposit assigned to
Loe city insuring the removal of walls on Doug Gorgen's property, enclosed
please fird an executed agreement and bond together with Doug's approval of
the substitution
Should the foregoing be acceptable, we would dpPreciate the exoeditious
release of the assignment on certificate of deposit No 51- 303325 issued
by Valley cederal Savings
..,.$incerely.
~1
Richard A. Petersen
2 +20 Witsnuo Doulovard, Sulto 200. P.0 Box 2131 Santa Slonica. Caldorma 90a0G
.N
AGREEMENT .
This agreement is made and entered in this 20± day of November 1982 by and,
between Haven Land and Vevelolment Co , "haven Land" herein) and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California ( "City" herein) Haven Land and the City aqree
as follows
RECITALS
A. Chevron Land and Development Co assigned a Certificate of Deposit in the
amount of $5,000 to the City pursuant to the terns and conditions set forth
in the letter of the City .1,,ted 18 December 190.0 made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A"
B The above referenced security provides for the satisfactory completion of
w -rk Jescribed in paragraph two (2) of an agreement by and between C Douglas
Gorgen and Chevron Land and Development Co dated 12 May 1982 made a part
40 hereof as Exhibit '8"
C The name of Chevron Land and Development Co. was changed to Haven Land and
Development Co by Instrument No g/- Zgr n2y recorded in official records
in the Cffice of the County Recorder, County of San Bernardinc, California
D. Haven Land now desires to substitute a faithful performance bond in the
amount of $5,000 in lieu of the Certificate of Deposit
E C Douglas Gorgen Is in agreement to the substitution of a bond in lieu of
the certificate of deposit as cvidenced in Exhibit "C" Raven Land and the
City further agree as follows:
1 Upon executicn of this agreement and presentation of a faithful performance
bond in Lhe amount of $5,000, the City shall release the assl�jnment of
certificate of deposit ilo. 51. 303125 Issued by Valley Federal Savinqs and
Loan Associatioa
15 �_ '
IC
f
2 Said bard shall serve as security to guarantee work described in paragraph
two (2) of Exhloit "B"
3 Said bond shall remair in effect until such time as a final subdivision map
has been filed on Tentative Tract tir 11606 pursuant to paragraph 5 of
Exhiolt "A" or until the work described in paragraph two (2) aoove has
been satisfactorily compjntnl or until such time as the walls described in
Exhibit "B" are determined to not i,terfere alth development of Tract 11606
whi,leve• occurrs first
N "haven Land and Development Co.
by:r Crisnar Development Corporation
general partner
, ) I_)
By YariD I^ory, Pres ent
City of Rancho Cucamonga
CAT NO hhnPa]a
TO taSA CA tl -UI //}}
(Corpontwn as a Partner of a PatTership) > a UtSIMANCa
STATE. OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Ln__S _FL T, } ss,
On 'DQrQM Ue.g 9 19 81 before me, the urdegned a Na[ary Public in and for
said State, penomlly appeareJ 1 r, AY— n „ m
Personally know, to me er Prosvd to me an the Lau o
i the wrthm Imvument as the
t
M `°—" "" Nr" ��r�InTee "Ied_[he^WIatNMIINfWn<NMf
the mrPrin son that eacculed the ,n(`In Instrument m
behalf of _ hlPden t.4 d r Odo ,..a..�
the Psnnerstup that « eemed
the wuhm munumem, and aeknualCdFed tome slut such
corponaon ex,CUted the same as wch p,rtnaa and the
• I such Pann:rshrp caecuted the same.
%VITNI.SS my hh,r4 and Wicsal scab
:' Vl
C
signature
Pruden[.
l6�1
IThh tea fw elf 41 ew...W an
w
W
,
SeraNaq•cf
+a; �;.h. LOREITA R. htORY
�ri.alt.'f� NLraaY r"r�t fa4'NrN
�.i:•Fjf• avUr4 Cr {rrr
ICS YKAOacN.wry
�!tt♦�, • 'h Caa"r:a tea fn i. I1R
l6�1
IThh tea fw elf 41 ew...W an
w
W
,
�XHIr3 )T r.
• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
7
To Whom It May Concern: f its duly authorized rep resentative
By the signature o
£ Rancho Cucamonga does hereby:
hereinbelo:a, the Oity o
1, Acknowledge its receipt o£ the original ValleyVFederr.l f
the issuance of n Certificate of De ;l1sit by Y
Savings and Loan (Certificate Noin to principaln amount a of
Development Co , a partmership,
$5,000.00. for
2, Acknowledge iLS reoniaL oL an AssCertif ,
security purroses, ofCthe=o ov1- deandibevelopmentcCo on
Deposit, executed by
3 -25 1980-
by said Certificate
3, Agree that the funds evidenced
of Deposit shall be held by the undersigned fo: the prr ?ose
necessary repairs to
ion of Chevron Land and Develoyment
of securing the obligatacent to
Co. to make or cause to be made any
the retaining wall installed thereby and located ad}
Lot 32 0£ Tract 9434.
4 Acknowledge that by virtue of said Assignment.
said Certificate of De ^rp91t
powered and authorized to utilize any
the undersigned is em
or all of the fucr£ormede aredrequired repairs to said re
taininu wall,
to cause to be p me ^t Co. has failed to rake
where Chevron Land an�ssavhanpthirty (30) days have elapsed
such repairs and no le °£ the need for =epair,
since each of Chevron Land and thirty pme,,. Co and the un er-
sigred have been nocifie, in writing
5,
Acknowledge '--me as
final subdivisionlmap uhas been
security until such Proper,-
cast of Lot ?2 °f
fled whil,' encomuaseus the real p
Tract 9434.
8• Acknowledge 'snd agree that Ch ^cvron Land and Oevel pnent
Co may from t1me tc tiDe substitute i othernCertificates ofiDCposit
o£ said Certi__ uata of p and that in no
in like amount for sa..
event shall the interest earned Certificate of Deposit
°osit,
or rtIfictut_ons thrreior,
9 on said Certificate o e.
or any renewals or oxtensio ss thereof, but shall at ill times by It,
be held as additional gendrand Development CO,
be payable to
Very truly yours.
CITY OF pNr :C)10 Cl.`7LGA
Veceaher 18. 1980 Oylts Authorized aearesentative
Dated: __�• 17 ,
EVH Jt;'r3-
CREYRO.1 LARD A:10 DEYELOPMUT CO.
2120 WILSHIRE SCULEYA.RD
SUIT 200
SAPTA MIICA, CALIFORt1IA 9,)103 0
C. Douglas Gorges, Esq. -
7333 H61man Avenue
Rancho Cuczrcnga, California -51730
Re: Flood Control Nall
Tract 9434. Lot 32
Dear Mr. Gorgen:
In connectior. with the retaining wall constructed or, certain real property
directly east of Lot 32 of Tract 9434, (the "Property'), the undersigned
hereby agrees to tndennify and hold harmless the ovners of the Property.
their successors and assigns, frog and against any loss, damage, Cast or
liability, including, but not Ticlted to, reasonab a attorney's fees and
costs, arising as a result of the design and in�tallatiun of said retain-
ing wall or the failure of the undersigned to nafatain said retaining wall
in accordance with the ubliS>.'wrs imposed upon tine undersigged order the
terms of a certain agreasurt wt►eer, the untersignnf and the /City of"
Rancho Cucaaotiga a o3py of which is attached Berets, for your inforraticn.
Tht r•dersigned further agrees to provide for the removal of re--perary
walls constricted at the oresent tervTinf of Gala Avetue and Victoria Street
and tie reca fining .all directly east of Let 32 of Tr.:ct 4434 at such time
as they are determined to interfere with the develap:ent of the adjacent
property.
I* accordance with your letter of February 25. 1960, It Is our understaedfrq
the: you will Immediately withdraw any and all oblect ons henitofore ease fry
you to the relevant governing bodies with respect to tte grading of Trst
9434 and the installation of the flood control wall or. the Prcnerty.
Shwld the fcregoing be acceptabia to you, please so fulf Cate by ererutfsq
and e_urning the enclosed ccry of this letter to the vadersigred to the
self- addressed rnd stayed envelope enclosed for your cmvenfence.
fiery truly yours,
CREVRD7 I= A.RD MELOF7'c.'IT CC.
BY: CRISHAR DEYELOFPVRT fGZPRATIaI
!L. 0 WT, Press t — —� - -��
Accepted and A;reed to this Say of 9'A
% /0
X H lfjty C
txUber 26. 1582
i", C. Douglas Gorgen. Esq.
7333 Hellmn Avenue
PanchO Cv=Dnoa, CA 91730
&1est: Flood Control :1,111;
Tract 9434. lot 32
Dear Doug;
As ou Y will recall, in pay 19W we es. -cuted a hold harmless agreement for the
a"T structure, The agreement further Proiided for the remoi'al of the wail
at such t.re as it is deemed to interfere with the developmnt of your property
As security for the remval of tFe wall. , i;rar assigned a certfficate of de-
w fn the amount of 55.00o to the City of Rancho Cucamonga The certificate
will Lture shortly.
At this time, it is cur desire tou subst,tute a faithful performance bond fn the
amcmK of 55.= in lfeu of the certificate. 1 nave dlscussed the proposed
sibs Ntuticr, with Lloyd Hubbs who haz indlpted no opposition.
L'1at tLe .crOvv -ed substitut100 Lave Your cOicurrence, He did require
%"'d tie foregoing be acceptable to You flease so indicate below and return
ttt &closed COPY of the letter in the sell- addressed and stamped envel4,le.
That you for your eonsideratlw of this r+:.ouest.
Yery truly ydrrs.
Y27{v Land and fevelcpm"t Co.
BY= C"%72r Develcprent Corooratidn
ISiC�drd n. . erkrsen
;-.s ,iythDr`lZe Ac-ent
1tCe9reo and ^ore^ -d to thf,; _i day of/V I
[o rk.
/ ' i•
Fxiosurv% / ''; een
cc: t: oyd araris G L GS/ c �, y
W/td
J
23204yntwie '
Bn+>t'nvd.5u.4a 217, 70. &�r ji3a.5an'.a L'cn•tm. Ca4forna 90:C6 12131829•tt6s
F111T111•IIL 1_r 2L, N1AHCP Otlllp
1514) t:et 010899
PBCHIW t4T: 190.00
♦`
R•
Stet. of Calls a,I,.ho nd ltyrC.`�aa^11 of the City of @tncho Cucamnga,
Ihcraln.fter doalgnatad oa VM J no Del to-t°,^_t —f3•
whore princi pal agroom [° P, ncfp., (' have enter °a -to en oq..... A,
Fmb4c InProve mu nta, which Install and comtIct° certain doalgnated
19 , o,W Jd.n t3f icd as said a.lrcc"At, daatpcJ��::
STieraby ratarroJ to and rn'Ja tI Pir�tr oCt Ali
Mifpriz. aid ,rt,icp.1 Is ranulred under the terms of said
an roenr•nt to furnish a bond for the to [h(ul pe rfotaanre of sold
1lOH, TIICBCFOOC, wa the Principal and
as cure tit are hold and firmly bound unto the Gip[y1��0T� k� �1 s r �
Ihetelnattar called "C1CY "1. In [AC pm.el sue of FYfr M . " -- ' -ri7a
O.liars (/ a 1 lawful mans of haus+nd
Payetnt o[ v to sum U.
rand truly Y the Dnlca sa re S, oe the
helm, sueeeeson. exueu tors y to be mode, ve bind ourso,vas, our
fl rm by thee° ras aAj ad.LnIs,r..trs, Jointly and O.YOrbily,
P en is
bauneml
The condition c[ this obligation 1s each that if the abova
p rlorl.,sl n,, or Ito hairs, executors administrator,,
,uceaaw[i 9 shell In all things send to and abide by, and
wall anI t.ulY tdOP and perform the covenants, eondfgone anU provlslons
In elm laid sgreeeent and any ae biro clan thereof made as taereln
pro ndad, on ..1 or train part, en be kept and Performed at the time
and In em intent therain meaning ,Peel lad, end In all respect According [o�
their to a fnice[ and . and shall Indemnify and pave harmless
this oblLmtlar o 'hall gh °e °me nnu empoyees, as therein s[f pulatsd, thrn
remain In tu,l force and offset and veldt otherwise, Se stall be and
hs
to the face amount apeciflOd [herofor, there Shall be Inelvded costs
and reasona,g° expenses and fees, Joel u•lf nq reasonable atto[nayy
toes, la"d 'I by Clty in succassrully onfor:ing such ebligstlon, all
to b° rased a sorts anU lncludcd In any 0ud9eent rand -red
The surety hereby sti PLletes and agrees that no change, ex.
tanston of tlw, altuatlen or of Jltlon to the terms of acment
e ir agr
or to mho wan to be performed tl,•roundar or the SPactff vats Agr amens.
Panylnq the Savo ,hale In an Ise stfeet Its obligations an this bond,
and to Jeus Sava alvo uti ru Of ant such change extension of t:m°,
to the rotation or add ltlon to the (sty of the agreement or to Na uark oe
to the Spae ll /c[t/ons
IP Ht"a It11LOCOY, tills Instramont Aa, been duly executed
by the principal and surety al,nvo named, on OICCIWFpy
" 19§t
Ihren Land .Ad Devalo: ,t Cs.
By Critar, Deralopeert Rr;oretloi
' � I
By I 7
T r o .�, tzt ant
Car t H, jl In."ence Co.4any,,11
B
Ariver
ittternlYQe•fJCt
((;Kuttl in Duplicate)
0
I�
]
t
{
:c
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 5, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager 1977
FR "M. Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
Sy: Barbara Kral], Engineering Technician
chnlclan
SUB:ECT: APPROVAL OF I11PROVE'1ENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR PARC;L
MAP 5792 - LEWIS PROPERTIES, INL , LOCATED WEST OF
ARCHIEALD AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD
Lewis Properties, Inc. has requested one -year extension of time
complete west of
oit ia
Map 5792 located their thrufect. Parcel
Road. Archibald Avenue
They have submitted an Improvement E•tenslan Agreement along with
an additional bond in the amount of $3,000.00.
A Faithfu] Perfcrnance Bond in the amount of $46,000 1s on file
in the City Clerk's office The $3,000.00 additional bond is to
guarantee completion of the street improvement pla s.
RECOMMENDATION
It 1s recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolutior
approving the Improvement Eztension Agreement and additional bald
and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to ,ign same.
R!yectfully submitted,
LBHVK:.Iaa
Attachments
r'
ar . ,
• RESOLUTION NO *
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVE ?;ENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 5792
WHEREAS, the City Council Nf the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for Its consideration an Improvement Extension Agreement
executed on January 5, 1983 by Lewis Properties, Inc. as Oevelop;, . for the
improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to real property specifically
described therein, and generally located west of Archibald Avenue, north of
Base Line Road; and
WHEREAS, tie installation of such improvements, describea in said
Improvement Extensioi Agreement and subject to the terns thereof, is to be
done in conjunction e,ith the development of said real property referred to as
Parcel Map 5792; and
WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreenent is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement S- curity, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the CILy of
® Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and
said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clprk to attest thereto.
PASSED, APOROVED, and !OOPrEO this 5th day of January, 1983.
AYES *
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. Wa 5er —map, ; ti y L
Jon D. ti kels, Mayor
Np.
E
e
TENTAT /VF_
PARCEL MAP Rte 5752
i) 7,
E
0
�ERS INSURANCE COMPANY
184
%TOS. CA. 90720 INCREASE OR DECREASE PENALIK RIDER
- •49,000 - performance 417 00
MOUNT (_49.000 - paZment 50;115 NO 100271 S 100271 -A PREMIVM f
DEVELOPERS ijdSURANCE COMPANY .wal,.,¢,th.bmd.LLENIS PROPERTIES, iNC.
If C n
U N Ih. p.dlr
46,200. 091a Id.ma
al N. tpwa d.aW ObltOw
V ld C HBnfer •1 ¢mw.
m n .md.nccd bT� p rm.w. do.[ It ... by xx" the p.mtT W uld b" b h. cum W
fna.m.
Forty -Nine Thousand ¢ 00/100 M1,I.[It 49.900.001,
b be ."eTt "... d the 2nd cur .1 Sun/' 19_7 mw dmc h.r.bT ayrpc thin dl.
conlbultl of V,de, m ,Cd.r cmd bzd c.bl.d b chap.[ N Demulty chill ml be Impatted bmebr, imld.d dot Ih. u nm. It -body
d Ib wW OFaBLOPERS ITrSpR1LNCF COMPANY "ell .1 r,ce.d the
m...1 of d¢bday* m.um.d by 11 d N. 5mr th. ml and /m agile W tldauh rm eommld.d and N m toms dill m:` i�dry uc.ed
N. Imps W N. abo.. mmron.d rvnc
ftvnd and ..d.a Nl`�Qi11_ -dar , Nnve ngpr IS�z.
By
!lEV�?ERC INSU0.ANGF COMPAt^'
1U11[T
David C. Banfec, 'ACT
Th..am. I. hereby d ..d band a[c.Pba
DIC 1/A
0
•y,
0900[[
Alb.,
TrtL[
°2`. -
?SV L=wis Pmperfts rc.
507Eaw F ✓LS'•ro1•00 e1.11:
T'stn c- 'a' a
71,544 7950
December 6, 1982
Ms Barbara Krall
Engineering Technician
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P o Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, C4 91730
Reference: Performance Bond No. 100271 S 100271 -A
Increase to $49,000.00
Dear Ms. Krell:
We are in receipt of the enclosed "Increase Penalty Rider" on the above
referenced bond to favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This should
complete the requirements for the Improvement Extension and added to the
documents we sent to you on November 23, 1982
Should you have need for any further informetion, please give me a call
Sincerely,
LEWIS PROPERTIES, INC.
names R. Lewis >
Senior vice President
JRL brs
Enclosure
0
W
CITY of W.CIQ CUCMV:Iw
IHAAOYEMENT EXTIhS.OM AGREMIIT
• PARCEL YAP SM
t" ALL MEN BY THESE fRESEITTS That this wrrn•n[ If ado rod eli lend Into,
In Can/ome nct with -he prnr9iont or the Saedlelalon Its, Act of tea City of k.' b
after referred CelltorasA, a Wnitrpal Corpnratted, by and Etc em the Sol, CIS, r•rfln-
a /t!f re /erred 10 a the City, and ��fe«wl . In
P- =Eletc
herela /tar nterrad to as the
HITMES ;ETN-
TPnT, WEREAG. told Developer entered Inm en 1gNYenert Jgrtca•'ri it the
City as A "oh"al[e to issuance e' Au :J•T Pernits and
RNEREnS slid Developer desires en es tension or ur! :u Lw ..t 'tC ..
the Said try,.nxent ♦9remnrt, r— C•
MOg, TNEPEro7r. It U hueby agreed by Ta City and by sa:d Dtreloper u
fal lws:
I The Cagte'tlan date of the -VMS of the said fepnrment nap. r. q ^t Is heresy
extended for a period o• �_donthf trod the data of enpintion of the safit
extended[.
2. Increase in Wrorantnt securltte t Ito reflect current Iepnve ent Costs the 1 he
furn II had by the Inlet oiler wl to this a9/eeeent and Shall be approved Cy tW City
Attcrney.
7. The repu••ed bond and the addltloal arinclpat awmts thereof are set forth on
page 2 of this agreement.
A the other t[rds and tends tlpns of the said iayroreant Agrem,t shell rcaln
the sloe.
As avllmcr of undersUMing tip DrollHmS CanUINd bereln, And of Intent to -cm, ly
wl th son, 'ne Developer has Subnittrl the below don -had Imnreudt security.
and has d:laed his signature hereto,
EAITIIEUL PEREOAyAICE BOND S76,000.00
9eicrlptlon Bond ". 100271 Additional PrIMIDaI Almnt: SsOCO 00
Suety: DtrelODOls Insurance Co. Tutal:S49.000.00
Address:
PATERIAI ANO LABOR SM 45,CW.00
Description: Bow Mo. 'OOd71A Additional P- fr"pal Aeomt: 7.000_'0
Surety: Developers Insurance Co. $79.000.00
Address:
C1SN DEPOSIT ImIt=lr IRO DAD
Addrtlanal Cash oeDalt:
114INIVIANCE GUARANTEE EMD
TO be Dotted Prior to accep ... cc of the project by the 0ty,
.......... ........ e......,..... ...................I......Mtpal AGOUnt:S 4.6DD.CO
........ I ..................
CITY OF AAAbq uLSEA,),GA uESEIOPCP
CALIEORIII4 a t nlr,pal
corporation 40 P/j
BY _ _Qj• .AAleid�✓ v
ATTEST hOTE Ccleloder'n sipnitu,c WS to
wurcn q ..ue Mss, •t���� notarl tad,
,u':'CT :u L ru7s1
Lie wl
,� tYfA a.4J1 Wa.V 49 , -
t� 44S INSURANCE COMPANY
ITOS, CA. 90720
INCREASE On DECREASE PENALTY RIDER
49,000.- perfccmance
�MoVNf S_49.000.- Payment FOND l;0.100271 L 100271 -A PNENlum S 417'00
_DEVCLOPERS INSURANCE COMPANY •uratr uccn tho bond ai LEWIS PROPERTIES, INC.
. V V u . V 4, In larac cl
M,,,t of and 0o119..
DaVid l7anfer 1 mW. Mr.to, do.o bu.br %DS%vf 0e pmlry of Wd band m the can M
m U ..)dmwd by �.— Ipmrcta.
Forty Nine Thousand E.00/100 Dofts (7 49,000.00),
W be .I:Mno u of N.- -2Ad -- ds oL -- =u 0 _ - ID E? and dwc Mt.br Wn. tW th.
rnnunWry of p .nb und.r "d bnd lWoCl W cbreq.o N p.naltr a"I not bo:mpabod bct.br.'. Jd.d"the aaanam. 110baltr
d be calve DE V .[cLINSURANCF COM}•ANY a.4 u1 ..c..d W
nuns of llabdlt Itsm= •d br It at N. I-- da =1 and /m am. W ddaull awtr aammlll.d and N m .,.It shall mca Ilabdlly uc..d
th, mpn of N. a�v nombwd cum.
Signal and ..W d iMc —lD±l _u.± of N,,,Pmhar Ip —u.
DIC 11A
io
���PCOC TNettRAN F CO�MPADiY
runm
ar nOMEY IM I.CT
Davicl C Banfer,
Th. abev. V h ... br creed to ana, copal:
muocc
Ina
JN'RJ:C' -.`.T .Y.i: `t:T i.4,C 2
CITY OT x 9100 Cl csrl -- 1
CO'13TCmur A:10 3000 CST2'Gtt
(Attack t.YT lC0.11: f[C lCICOULL
IA[l]Ch l0 •'IM1rVai[i[•t COPY*)
0. \Tb 3127/80 PCP:IIT w.— C0.01.•ICO OT d'b Po
rile Paler.... Per sl Mae 5102 city ora•Ddd ro.Y_„DI fd„1}et.
,,,C, W.. no, IAalxd. c..mn[ t.. for Yntino V.nit .r P[ve...nt "Places
•.nt d.Falt..
miSTRL'CT[D'd CWT t3TIMAT--
TOTAL C033T^ORICd COST 40.000.LO
}YSP[R }m RI<
ITT
In T fnv
a�e'w��
fK \IIV 411 nF VA1_
nc
' ^
. L. Y. \VL4CVT 1 l
3.••
'�/jt•. f•0
STOIC " Y tf T- If_y
STOIC
CVA! t fli tlCV __ 016
t
a l Dt,%m t { •
3.1.
Ol \ .4 YY.AU� [Il•lin -�
S�[t•
v: yxCO KfyW, -r mam.
a
WM
{C vj��•yL.3 -�� � —• --
STPCCT 3 LU
G.
��
C TCII .114
FA
.I tT ST.LRC.1
[d
S•11•CT ETGV \T'm S�
•t '�
•Anm ne A[n
••• •,•I
IYmm . c onnne• uo
ca
w _^
I l n
D
Idnn
i
1 `
�• I
1-
.
F Ofcuny
LL'.OSGY[ { IAXICATIOt 1 �_
L•y•
T-1
TOTAL C033T^ORICd COST 40.000.LO
}YSP[R }m RI<
06
2. TOTAL I33PCR20.V rm, . L,312 35
It CO: L'6RIDY TUT RCT •d
111 10: CCRt=.CICS
IV. OCStGY T[L^ (10] or Total C].rtrvc ant C..1 GtlmrF)
bl•hr.l rerfertune. [ond 9 19.070.00
m[url]t and Llh.r mnd - f •:9.000.011
MII,wl.c. Pnnd 7
Ce.h BFnuxntacit D.p..la • S
ttt22[ Q ` �:
CO::SS^CRIOV[11Y PCRIGI-
' ^
\'IYT Y \VI YIY[ •r'i
STOIC " Y tf T- If_y
STOIC
06
2. TOTAL I33PCR20.V rm, . L,312 35
It CO: L'6RIDY TUT RCT •d
111 10: CCRt=.CICS
IV. OCStGY T[L^ (10] or Total C].rtrvc ant C..1 GtlmrF)
bl•hr.l rerfertune. [ond 9 19.070.00
m[url]t and Llh.r mnd - f •:9.000.011
MII,wl.c. Pnnd 7
Ce.h BFnuxntacit D.p..la • S
ttt22[ Q ` �:
RESOIUT:ON NO. ' 1;-:3 'J
A RESOLUTIM) OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CA'.IFUHNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR NORTH TOWN PHASE 'I. AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF CO. +IPLETION FOR THE WORK
WHEREAS, -:he construction of public improvement. for Worth Town Phase
III have been completed tr the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and
WHEREAS, a NOt,ce of Completion is required to oe filed, certifying
the work complete
NOW, THEREFCRE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and
the City Enginee,' is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorner of San Bernardino County
PASStO APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1983
ALES-
NOCS:
® ABSEN :
ATT EST:
Lauren M. Niseernaac, C ty er
7on 4771W.s, Nayor
�1
RECORDIUG REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF tANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post office Boa a01
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
WHEN RECOnDEO MAIL TO:
CST1 CLERK
CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Bea 807
AanchO Cucamonga, CA 91770
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
1 The undarslgnud Is an owner of an Interest or .... to In
tPe hereleafter described real property, the nature of which I ...... t
or estate If
NORTH TOUR PHASE III, STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Z. The full name and address of the Ynderflnned Owner is:
CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 9770 -C D.se Line Road, Post Office Nos MIT.
Rancho Cucoonga, California )1770.
7. On Cho SLR day of Janu..y 1987, there was co�pleted on
the bereinaftel described real VoPerty the wort of Improvement set
forth Is the contract documents for:
h GRTH TOUR PARSE III, STREET IIIPAUYEMENTS
a The name of the original contractor for the wort of
impalement as a whole was: AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION
5 The real property referred to .+ -tin Is situated In the
City Of Ntecho Cucamonga, COO hey or San E ardino, State of
Calt(er. a, and 'a described as folio wS,
MIRTH TOUR PHASE III, STREET IMPROVEMENTS
The street address of said Croperty Is: 7/A
DATED
CITY DE RATCHO CUCAMDOGA, a
aanlclpal cor-orst 0.1, Owner
er:
[news
'Ti Ue)
t
}
i.t
•s,
0
RESOLUTION 140. * ? -f
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
!UC MONPJI, CALIFOR ".A, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR D.R. 81 -24 (TOKAI) AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE STORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for D.R. 81 -24 have
been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying
the work complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby cccepted and
the Ciry Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with
the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Lauren M. asserman, ty Yer
won 0. e— sayo
30
RECOVING REQUESTED BY:
CITY OF RAMfMO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Bo: 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 31730
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Rost Office Boa 807
Rancho Cuctmonga, CA 91730
r_-t
DATED
1
31
CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
cunlcipal corporation, Owner
BY:
Name)
I flt la)
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
1, Inv undersigned Is an owner of an interest or estate In
the hereinafter described rem prop ertr. the nasure of which interest
aI estate Is: Otracter ¢ev itw 81 -2A ITOkal of Apt
2 The full name and address of the undersigned Ovne• is:
C,TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 9320 -C Base Line Road, Pon Office Boa 807,
•
Rancho Cucamonga, CAllfo.nla 91730.
3 On the 9th day of January, 1983, there was eosplated on
the hereinafter described real property the work of Iaprovenent set
forth in the contract documents for;
Director Review 81 -24
e The name of the Original contractor for the work of
improvement as a whole was, TOkal of American, Inc.
S The real property referred tr barein Is situated in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of So, Bernardino, State of
California, and is described as followst
Director Ro.iew 81.20
The street address of said proaerly is: 10703 7th Street
DATED
1
31
CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a
cunlcipal corporation, Owner
BY:
Name)
I flt la)
A
0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
OATL January 5, 1982
TO: City Council dri 'City Manager
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Richard Cota, As:,ociate Civil Engineer
ct•�aro .
i
1?
rnl
SUBJECT: Formation of Underground Utility District No. I Along Archibald
Avenue from Foothill Ooulevard to Church Street
At . "e regular meeting of November 4, 1981, the City Courcil adopted
Resolution No. 81 -175 (attacheds establishing a prioritizcJ list of six
putential projects for lmplc.ren ation of an active underground program
Additionally, it directed the F.ndveering Staff to implement project
number one (1) with currently ivailabio funds. Said funds then currently
available am..:nted to $293,111.
On November 10, 1981, the tr.gineeriig Staff corresponded with the
Southern California Edison Company ,SCE) requesting a cost and time
estimate to undergruund existing ove'head electric distribution lines on
Archibald Avenue, from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road It was
determined that SCE could budget said project for construction conrenr,ng
January, '983, at the estimated cost of $720,000 or about $128 50 per
foot.
Subsequent correspondence received from SCE's Area Manager suggested that
our Ctty'a first underground project be seduced in size or delayed due to
^•ding r., ic,t in the aiiocation pricy of Rule 20A and the
advancing of future funds for current projects. Coiseauently, the
Engsncering Staff revised tae linits of project number orr on Archibald
froc Foothill Boulevard to Church Street. This revision significantly
reduces the impact on the number of property owners requires to convert
to on -site underground facilities Existing properties on the east side
of Archibald Avenue either presently have briderground facilities or are
required tc underground aue to current new development of said
properties The Marlborough tract located east of Archibald Avenue and
South of Church Street fronts Archiba'd Aveoua for approximately 676
feet. Their tract condition to underground uti 'it ies on Archihald Avenue
will help to diminsh the costs required of Rule 'OA funds. Field
investigation has determined that only one property owner on the moist
side of Archibald Avenue will be affected by the undergrounding.
According to SCE, this property owner may still retain their overneie.
facilities, subject to possiule meter box relocation, Deiiud the s -bject
oroperty, power poles exist which will not be affected by 'he prop•usid
continued ..
n
., CN
City C ncil Staff °_-• ri
Underg and utility 'strict No. 1
0enuar3 S. 1983
Page 2
undergrounding district
The SCE's Engineering Department is in the process of tom?ieting
engineering plans for undergrounding existing overhead power lines in
Archibald Avenue hccwcen Foothill Boulevard and Church Street. Based on
SCE's estimate oil 5128.50 /linear foot, the cost to underground Archibald
Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street wtuld be
approximt,:ry: ($128.50/L F )(2625 Ft.' . $337,312 50.
Dur•og the siting of this Staff Report, our City retailed notice of our
1d02 Rule 204 allocation in the amourt of $35,355. A subsequent phone
conversation between our Engineering Staff and SCE's Area Manager has
determined that our City's 1983 Pule 20A allocation, bas,d on the current
Shuuld allocation
Deapp approximately and S30,000t. The r
refore, as of this O each
ateouryCity's
r.vo lable Rulu 20A funds for profec,, No. 1, excluding the Protected 1983
dilatation, is $328,466.
The SCi Comp.my will, at its expense, replace Ili existing »•erhead
electrir facilities with underground electric facilities provided that
the goveninS body of oLr City has:
a Determined, di'ter consultation with SCE Company and after holdfi,q
public hearings on the subject, that such undergrounding is in the
general public interest; and
It. Adopted an ordinance creating en underground district in tha sub ?pct
area.
The City's Engineering Staff r„ormends holding a public hearinu In
February for the .formation r Underground Utility District No. I If the
C t� Council finds that far. titles shall be installed underground, the
Council may aidpt a resolution (attached) declaring the formation of said
underground utility district
RECa MENDAT10h:
It is recommended that ,.ouncil adop. the attached R ^solution calling fo-
a public hearing on icbrualy 10, 1983, to determine .ih2ther public
necessity, health, safety or welfare requires the foniat,on of
Underground Utility District No. 1 aiorg Archibald Avenue from FeeLnill
Boulevard to Church Street.
Respectfully sutmitted,
LBf�;blc
Attachments
3:J:1
0
C , /,
• RESOLUTION NO. • • -'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUh..IL OF THE CIIT OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC H °_ARING TO
DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFFTY OR
WELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY
DISTRICT NO. 1 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD TO CHURCH STREF.r, AS MORE "'RTICULARLY
DESCRIBED IN THIS RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that an underground utility
district, hereinafter called District, be formed; and
WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 13,04 estabiisi'es a
procedure for the creation of underground utility districts +.nd requires as
the initial step in such procedure the holdino of a public hearing to
ascertain whetr.er public necessity, health, safety, or welfare requires tha
removal of pules, overhead wires, and associated overhead structures and the
underground installation of wires and facilities for supplying electric,
communication, or similar or associated serv'ce in any such district.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANrPO CUC.VIONGA, as follows:
SEi:TION 1. That an underground utility district be formed in the
following described area:
Those portions of Cucamonga rruitlands, as per plat reccrded I. Book
4 of Maps, Page 9; Tract No. 8795, as per plat recorded 1n Guok 1224 of Maps,
Pages 19, 20 and 21; Tract He 5617 as per plat recorded in B00% 65 of Maps,
Pages 4 and 5; Portion of the Southeast quarter, Section 3, Township 1 South,
Range 7 West, San Bernardino Base 3.,d meridian, per Assessor's Map recorded in
Book 208, Page 12; Tract No 9187, es per plat recorded in Book 127 of Maps,
P.ges 24, 25 and 26, Lucas and Ward Subdivision, as per plat recorded in Bode
19 of Maps, Page 71; Parcel Map No. 4767, as per plat recorded in Book 47 of
Parcel Maps, Paq ^s b and -; Porticn of the South Half of the Northwest quarter
of the Southwest quarter, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San
Bernardino Base and Meridian, per Assessor's Map recorded in Eook 1077, Page
34; Portion of the North Half of the Southwest quarter of he Southwest
quarter, Section 2, Tnwnship 1 South, Range 7 West, San Berndrdino Base and
Meridian, per Assessor's Map recorded In Book 1077, Page 63; Portion of the
Southwest quarter, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino
Base and Meridian, per Assessor- recorded in Book 1077, Page 64, all
records of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California,
lying within a strip o° land 120,00 feet wid,, the centerline of which is
descrtt +d as follows
Beginning at the Intersection of he centerlines of Foothill
Boulevard and Archiba'e Avenue, thence Northe ly along said centerline of
Archibald Avenue, a distance of 2,625! feet to the intersection of the
?�l
centerlines of Church Street and Archibald Avenue
The sidr.lines of said 120.00 foot ride strip of lend are parallel to
and measured at right angles from the above described -.onterline of Archibald
Avcnue and shall be prolonged or shortened ,o as to beg +n from said centerline
of Foothill Boulevard and terminate at said centerline of Church Street.
SECTION 2 NOTICE IS HEREBY GiVEN that a p-,blic hearing will be held
by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 16, 1983, a; the
hour of 7 :30 P.M. at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road,
Rancho Cucamonga, California, to ascertain whether the public necessity,
health, safety, or welfare requires the renoval of poles, overhead wires and
associated overhead structures and the underground installation of wires and
facilities for supplying electric, communication or similar associated service
in the District herein described
SECTION 3 At such hearing all persons interested shall be given an
opportunity to be heard. Said hearing may he continued from time to time as
may be determined by the City Council.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall notify all affected property ownL,•s,
as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and utilities concerned of the
time and place of such hearing by mailing a copy of this r +solution to such
property owners and utilities concerned at least ten (30) days prior to the
date thereof,
SECTION S. The area proposed to be included in the District is shown
upon that certain map entitled •Underground Utility District No. 10 which 1s
on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
Calffornra.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th Gay of January, 1983.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
ATTEST•
Lauren M. Nasseman, ty erF
on 0 mi a s,, Mayor '--
..ice
r
RESOLUTION NO
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANC40
0CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FORMING UNDERGROUND UTILI "Y
DLIT.RICT NO. 1 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD TO CHURCH STREET
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on February 16,1983, at the hour
of 7 30 p.m., at the Lions Park Camunity Lenter, 9161 Base Line Toad, Rancho
Cucamonga, California, to determine whetP -r the public necessity, health,
safety or welfare requires the formation of an underground utility district
along Archibald Avenue, from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street, Rancho
Cucamonga, California; and
WHEREAS, a notice of such hearing has been given to all affected
property owners as shown on the last equalized assessment roll and to all
utilities concerned in the manner and for the time required by law; and
WHEREAS, such hearing has been duly and regularly held and all
persons Interested h,ve bee, giver. an opportunity to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, as follows:
SECTION 1. It is hereby found and determined pursuant to Rancho
Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 13.04 end the definitions contained therein
that the public necessity, health, safety and welfare require the formation of
an underground utility district along Archibald Avenue, from Foothill
Boulevard to Church Street, Rancho Cucamonga, California, a public street
which is extensively used by the general pubic and carries a heavy volume of
vehicular traffic, in order to remove utility poles, overhead wires and
associated structures and to underground utilities along said portion of
Archibale Avenue
SECTION 2 An underground utility district to known as
Underground Utility District Co I is hereby established in that area along
Archibald Avenue, from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street, Rancho Cucamonga,
California, more particularly described as follows
Those portions of Cu� xnorgo Fruitlands, as per plat
recorded n Book 4 of Mans, Pa;- 9; Tract No. 8796, as
per plat recorded in Rook 124 of Maps, Pages 19, 20 and
21; Tract No 5017, as per plat recorded in Boot 65 of
Maps, Pane 4 and 5, Potion of the Southeast quarter,
Secti ^n 3, Township 1 South, Rang- 7 West, San Bernardino
Base and Meridian, per A;sassor's Map recorded in 8cok
208, pane i2, tract No. 9187, is per plat recorded it.
Book 1Z7 of Maps, Pages 24, 2R and 26 Lucas and Ward
Subdivision, as per Flat r ^co•d,d in Book 19 or Maps,
Page 71, Parcel Mip No 4767, as per plat recorded in
Book 47 of Parcel ' -aps, Pages 6 and 7, Portion Of the
South Half Of the ihrthne:t quarter of the SOLthwest
a .9
quarter, Section 2, Township 1 South, Rangy 7 West, San
Bernardino Base and teridian, per assessor's Map recorded
in Book 1077, Page 34; Portion of the North Half of the
Southwest quarter of the Southwast quarter, Section 2,
Township I South, Range 7 Wes., San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, per Assessor's Man recorded in Book 1071, Page
63, Portion of the Southwest quarter, Section 2, Township
1 South, Range 7 rest, San lernardino Base and Meridian,
per Assessor's Map recorded in Book 1077, page 64; all
records of the County Retorter of San Bernardino County,
State of California, lying within a strip of land :20.00
feet wide, the centerline of which is described as
follows
Beginn'ng at the intersection of the centerlines of
Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, thence Northerly
along said centerline of Archibald Avenue, a distance of
2,625± feet to the intersection of the centerlines of
Church Street and Archibald Avenue.
The sidelines of said 120 00 foot wide strip of land
arm parallel to and measured at right angles from the
above described centerline of Archibald Avenue and shall
be prolonged or shortened so as to begin from said
centerline of Foothill Boulevard and terminate at said
centerlone of Church Street
NOTE: That certain map entitled "Underground Utility
District No. 1," which is on file in the office of the
City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, is attached
hereto and made a part of this description of the
Archibald Avenue Underground Utility District No. 1.
SECTION 3. All poles, overhead wires and associated overhead
structures shall be removed and underground installations made in said
underground u tility district within the following times:
a Underground installation by Utility Companies and property owners
and reconnections not later than Fetruar• 1. 1983.
b Removal of poles, overhead wires and other associated structures
not later than May 1, 1983.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to mail e. copy hereof
and a copy of Municipal Code Section 13 04 to all affected property owners as
shoocn on the last equalized assessment roll and to all affected utilities
within ten (10) days after the adoption of this resolution.
7' J
.- ,
r�
0
4 ..
I F -1
■un.o� i -
ti
0
IG�r
f
CITY OF a.\\:cl to ccc,\.\lo*\*cA
; N(.I\CCRI\G on Islo`.
vIC:I\ITl' WP —
ul�. 3g
t
tItly;
//��.�
/J u
iJy Vw
"T "'TyStU1.0
UT� ITT CIIT"�
t
E
0
a
2�
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAb/ONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 5, 1983 1-1 %T�
U
TO: City Council and Cit, Manager 1977
FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Alts Loma Channel Assessment District Consultants
Contracts
Attached for Council approral is the con %ultant contract with Don
Owen and Associates as Assessment Engineer and Brown and Mazarek
as Bond Counsel for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District.
The consultants were designated in the property owners petition
and complete the agreements for services on this District.
Mr Owen's agreement may be terminated with completion of
property owners meeting for a fee of $9,000. Full processing
through the District formation hearing is fixed at $25,000. Upon
successful sale of bonds, an additional $17,000 charge would be
Incurred in bond sale for financial consulting.
Mr Brown's proposal can be terminated at anytime with charges
not to exceed $12,SOO.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that Council approve the consultants contracts
with Don Owen and Associates and Brown and Mazarek to act as
consultants to Assessment District 82 -2 and authorize the funding
from the Drainage Fee fund.
R,V�0ectfully jubmitted,
L f jaa
A achment
•�
0
7
et
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 5, 1983
To: City Council and City Manager
From: Bill H0IIcy, Director, Coramuoity Services
,•yam a..
t° Af
LL �
O
� � 2
19n I
By: Hary hhitne Administrative Secretary. ry, Community Services
Subject: Historic La;.;._ork Designation - Etiwanda Cairns
At the llist'Tic Prosorvati•.n Commission meeting sold Caccober 14 a
Public }searing was hold regarding the historic significance
Etiwanda "ai of the
ms
The property on which the cairn., are located is currently owned by
the University or California - Berkolcy
The attached memo (12/13/82) to the Historic areservatlon Commission
contains a listing of all Individuals and agencies contacted regarding
the Etiwanda Cairns
It is the reco.•anendation if the Historic Preservation Commission that
the Etiwanda Cairns bo designated as a C ty H stet c Lan mar
Phis recommendation for such a designation is a precautionary measure
to protect the cairns from being disturbed in the event of development
!n that area
In th- future, should anyone wish to develop that area, it would be
their responsibijicy to retain a professional to dismantle the cairns
to discern their historic significance (or lack thereof)
BII:Afw /rn-
11T
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUIV
December 13, 1982
Tn Historic Preservation Loramiss..m
From: Mary W%itney, Cocm:tnity Se-vices Department
Subject: Etivanda Cairns - Public Hearin] (continued frua Juno meeting)
During the several weeks prior to end after the Public Nearing hold
in June rega_^diag the Etiwanda Cairns, the following persons were
amt cted in an effort to solicit any information they may have concerning
the Etiwandr Cairns.
A71 adjacent p- nu;rty o"oT-
Beatrice McAllister, Chaffey College Archeology Department
Don Norgin, Chaffey College Anthropology Department
Robert Lerman, Pomona College Sociology /Anthropology Department
Donald Brcrmeis, Pitzer College, Anthropology Department
Divid ironenfeld, University of California- Riverside, Anthropology Department
Philip hilLe, University of California - R1•arside, Archeology Department
Or. Smith. San Bernardino County ?Wseum,
Dr. yumzmellon, State Office of IUstoric Preservation
University of California - Berkeley, Baird of Rogents (also Departments
of Archeology and Anthropology)
Southern California Historic Society
Professor Thomas Blackburn, Cal Poly - Pomona
Professor 9onald Pflucger, Cal Poly - Pomona
We have, thus far, received no encouraging words from any of the above
concerning our endeavor to place the designation of Historic Landmark on
the Etiwanda Cairns lbst of the above did not acLnowledge our correspon-
dence. Those that did had littae or no information concerning the cairns
W
14 '
M+
M,
W
•
21,
CJ
North
PI
� r
, P
Im
Im
L
ETI' A:7DA CAIfii:D
�
I
June 1, lyEl
L
m
Is
w
on Ave.
�-
_ 7-7-
- . "
1 El shaped.
3 Oouble length
o
B ecall rectangular cairns ( one has been opened)
c�
Not to scale but position is typical.
u
.0
Ng NEI. N%. - Sec. 29
TIN R6N, Sven;
�
c
ti
c
+�
Fr
m
T I ru
e H
a
> m
G T
� r
, P
Im
Im
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITE COUNCIL OF THE CITL OF
RANGED CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
ETIWANLA CAIRNS'AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE
OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE
DESICNATTNG IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK.
WHEREAS, the Citl 'ouneil of the City of Rancho Cicamonga,
California, has adopted Chapter 2.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
relating to historic preservations and
PHBREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission hag
investigated the historic significance of the Cairns and has held public
hearings concerning the cairns in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho
Cucaronga Municipal Code relating to historic preservations and
WHEREAS, the Historic preservation Commission has found the Etivanda
Cairns to be a aign_ficant historic fearure of the City, and thereby
recommends the Cairns for designation haea City Historic Landmark.
NOW, THEREr .DRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Faricho Cucamonga, California, ad fol laws,
• The City Council finds and de¢entLnes that the Etivanda Cairna,
located on the north 1/2 of the northeast 1/. of the northwest 1/4 of Section
29, TIN R6W, of the San Bernardino County Book of Maps (general location,
smith of Nilson, vest of H4nle33 had net the criteria established for
designation as a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, and with the
-ecommondation of the Historic Preservation Commineion, designates the
Etivanda Cairns as a City Historic Landmark.
PAS9E), APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1983.
AYES,
F RS:
APSENT,
ATTEST,
Lauren M. wesserman, City Clark
1��
Jon U. Nikels, Mayor
E
E.
J
\
CITY OF rW CIIO CUC XMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE. January 5, 1982
TO: City Council and.City Manager
FROM Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer
BY: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Carnelian Street Improvements, Contract Change Order No.3
c�tiloA-
'
'n
z�J C
CE O
d>
W7 i
Subsequent to the award of the svbie:t contract, tye City recelv4d
additional information from CalTrans En,ineers and the Pavement F,bric
Manufactures concerning recormended asphalt overlay thickness whcn laying
reinforcing fabric over existing portland cemen, cnncrete pavement.
Originally, the minimum reconnended asphalt overlay thirkness we.s 0.12' over
the center 30 feet of Carnelian Street which woulI offer lap the 24 foot wide
existing portland cement concrete paveme.. The prnject was therefore
designed and estimated for 0.20' asphalt overlay. However, the additional
information received !trongiy reccanends an overlay 0ickness of 0.30' which
includes d safaty factor to insure the success of the asphalt overlay above
both the reinforcing fabric and P.L.C. pavement.
The cost of the additional A.0 and tack coat required exceeds the original
contract contingency amount. Therefore, the Engineering Staff is requesting
the following additional appropriation of funds to construct the extra A.C.
overlay thickness:
CONTRACT CHANuE OPDER NO. 3
1JDO Tons Additional A.0 0 $21.50,Ton - 521,500.00
Additional Tack Co,,L, Lump Stan - 54,250.00
Sub Total - , 5150. a
Contingency LOX - $2 575.00
TOTAL • S28, 313.615
(original Contrart Amount - $1 ,14,712.82
Original Contingency of 10% - ;14,411 28
RECOt41ENDATION:
The Engineering Staff recome,,ds that the City Council approve Contract
Change Order Lin. 3 and the additional appropriation of $28,325 00 required.
Respectfully submitted,
LBH:RC:bc
%4:71
0
CITY OF RAACHO "thhOI
CO.TT'J.ACT CIM"t ODDta A0. 3
Shttt 1 or 1
paOJFR: Cunelfan Street I,yrovezents
C017QAR hO. 03 -01
TO: Fontana paring, Inc
TOO are hereby dirteted tp Mae the herein describe. tungas fro Contract,, and
soselficitiprs or do tM follorinq desNbed work not inc l.dea m the plant an.
fpeC1 /Igt10nS an toll contract.
MOTE: this change order is not effectlye until aporOned by the City tnglnetr
Description of wort to be lone, a nests of ol"Ititles, and prices to be call.
Oft a's otlmvlSO stated, Additional rtess is' "'is'rof pprice, agroee price
only and force accttnt.
"Olp,ent is scta'IIY Wed end m elloratca rill lDbe "do far only sloe,tl.Y ere
Change "Quested by. City of Aancha C,,,,c qa
—7sieZaii GI en tags foam le tM Ai O::: IF:
l
Qu n
tntity In the [.fglneer's Estleat!• cree" or pec"afs 7 rd va . -Iq,1
1. This Ito will SO"' At item 'Ayer two (2) of tnQ oHglnei scot -.ct a follgis:
D. Adds hentln4cR�wai tons
lor additional at of
Per • S21,SDO.CO Y/
To w SAO . 4.�
Total
w.
This change If due es a
P.C.C. parcmnt. 'suit Of addltlnel A.C. Paying "ou Fred when overlaying efif0
IS seated Co.t Decrease S
a z1" and ea
�
Or increase S !,a"1 g.
BY reason or inn 01 the Ile, o
Cool"WeA will be
adjusted as fo110q:
Dan tM Dy
Approved City [ng e[r
dQ tn! .nQarf �gneo CJnlldetOr neYe glvin
and
If this
Date..
Carer. --
cMfl0lntlQn tQ
nraneeYlryree. :Se cn,YQa aroaY)CQ
Jroapfdl Is aocrJYed, that
d L[Qr I, If, ewm Krill JfoY I'd J11
flryli df e4, Otheryl
Ces rece SfJrr "r the rOrk
alYl`Mt•
not
be noted ,bare, all cartel, 111
abOre fpCCllse
InCI!(Or :r, prices fhYYll AM". ed• and will accept ,S F.I. J,Y•Q'1[
- D210V14 ¢.�1
Cnntrlctoyggqq��'�ilna
CCia- i2'Saafet•S�
- �J
CITY OF RANCHO COCA =NC-A
STAFF REPORT
t`o �yUnrglcv
s
19}:
DATE November 10, 1982
TO Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Rick Goxez, City Planner
F'i: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: ENV[RONMEtRAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -03 - BIOCAL -
change o zone ron - ng a Family Rest entia to
R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) for 2 02 acres of land
located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, n,.rth of
Monte Vista Street - APN 201- 131 -61 8 62
Related File: Tentative Yract 12256
rROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone
is In conjunction w th a twent! -five unit condominium project on 2 10
acres of land located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and
Monte Vista Street (Exhibit "A ") The development proposal, Tentative
I Tract 12256, is also on the agenda this evening f_r your review and
consideration and is attached as Exhibits "8" and "C" A description
of Vie project is provided with the Tract Map Staff Report.
The development proposal is located on the three Parcels shown on
Exhibit "0" However. this zon" change request covers only the two
large lots The small lot to the south is already zoned 9-3.
Lar.'- ^undirg the subject parcels is zoned R -3 .he General Plan
shows that the project site is located along the dividing lines between
two land use designations: Low Medium density (4-8 dur's /ac) to the north
and Medium Density (4 -14 du's /ac) to the south Bordering the project
site to the north and west is a mobile home park A mi.1 of older
single family and multi - family units exist on small residential lots
south of the project. On the east side of _- cnibald, across from the
site, is an approved multi- family project.
ANALYSIS. The project site 1s adequate in size end shape to accom-
modate tt types Lr uses that would be permitted within the Rv zone.
The zone change in : onjunction with the development plans should pro-
vide an adequate tr nsition between the mobile hcme park to the north
and west and the R -, lots to the south The change of zone and density
of 11 90 units per a, re proposed development are also consistent with
the General Plan land use designations of Median tensity Residential
(4 -14 du's /acre)
q6 ITEM F
Zone Change 82- 03 /Bidcal
Planning Commission Agenda
November 10, 1982
Page 2
ENVIRONMENfAI. REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the
pp c1�li ant, is pr.,vFded for your rev) =w and consideration Staff has
completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no
adverse impacts on the envir- .nar:nt as a .result of this zone change If
the Commission conairs with sucn findings, issuance of a Negative Derlara-
tion would be in order.
FACTS FOR FINDING: the project site is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed lot size. the change of zone is consistent
with the General Plan and corresponding Tract Map and has a density
within the range allowed. The approval of this zone change will not
create adverse impacts on surrounding properties.
CORRESPONDENCE. This Item has been advertised as a public hearing
in fie DafT Re ort news�eper, and thirty -three property owners within
300 eet o ire tub ect oroperty have been notified To date, no cor-
respondence related to the zone change hoc b':en received.
RECOKIENDATION: It is recommended thet the Planning Commission con..ider
a 1 nT' m)d elements relative to this project If after such crnsidera- W
tion the Commission can support the findings, adoption of the attached
Resolution would be appropriate.
Attachments Exhibit
"A" - Location Map
Exhibit
"B" - Tentative Tract Mar 72256
Exhibit
"C" - Detailed Site Plar
Exhibit
"D" - Assesscr', Map
Initial
Study, Part 1
Resolution
of Approval
_
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA11071GA, CALIFORNIA, REZONINC ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
202 - 131 -61 & 62, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, NORTH OF 140`ffE VISTA STREET FROM R -1 TO R -3
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does
ordain as follow:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby firds and determines the
following:
A. That the Planning Cmanission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, following a public hearing helc in the
time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the
rezoning of the property hereinafter described, ano
this City Council has held a public hearing in the
time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and
considered said recommendation.
a That this rezoning is consistent with the General
Plen of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
C This rezoning will rime no significant envirorunental
impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed
herein.
SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned
in the mminer stated, and the Toning map is hereby amanded accordingly.
2.02 acres of land located on the .rest side of Archibald
Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street, frra R -1 (Single
Family Residential) to R -3 (Multi- Family r�etidential).
SECTICII 3: The Mayor shall sign this Oruinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its
passage at least once in The Dzil Re art, a newspaper of general circulation
puolished in the City of— C'ntar o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, California.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of December, 1982
AYES
NOFS:
ABSENT
I
-- CITY OF RANCHO CtICAMONGA c,,�cssr
STAFF REPORT �O
Y
a e
o`
r�
DATE Januar. 5, 1e0 Gi g,
T0: tlealher of the City Council and City Manager is:
FROM: Rick Ganz, City Planner
BY: Tin J. Beadle, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: REVISED CONTRACT FROM INLAND MEDIATION BOARD (FORMERLY WEST END
TES rrCf N BO D
ABSTRACT: This report presents an overview of the status of our contractual
re a— t onsnip with Inland Mediation Board (formerly titled West End Mediation
Board) and provides a revised contract, which was requested by the Board.
BACKGROU140: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a contractual relationship with
ih-FToard to provide for mediation services between -cater and landlord tenant
disputes and has worked in the cosrunity under th- contract approved by the
City Cocncil since June of 1111 During this time the City has received
satisfactory performance from the Mediat on Board. The Mediation Board
perform; a service provided for as a requirement o; lei- housing through our
administrati" obligations of the Con;inity Development Block Grant program.
The original contract was funded for 52100 from our Community Development
Block Grant application.
Sinc- adoption tf the contract, Lne Watt End Mediation Ooard has undergone
s(ai changes. No longer are they under contract with the City of Ontario who
proiid.J their office space at nc charge. They have since moved their
location to Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, they will be operati„^ under a
contract agreement t, provide services for the entire unincorporated areas of
the cwmty and tt.: city of San Bernardino. Thus, the change to the name
Inland Mediation Board. A new contract is proposed to reflect the change in
status of the Inland Mediation Board The contract provides for a similar
contractual arrangement and performance as set forth under the original
contract with West End Mediation Board. In general it provides the following:
1. Establi, has a contractual relationshi{ with the
Inland Mediation Board similar to that of the West
End Mediation Board
2 Provides for a.. increase in the yearly fee for
services to $3600 (requiring an additional
allocation of 5875 to pay for the remaining seven
(7) months under the nea contract).
IY
Inland Mediation Board
City Ccuncil Aqenda
January 5, 1983
rage 2
3. Provides for a buaget cycle to coincide with Rancho
Cucamonga's Redevelopment Block Grant year.
Attached to tht•. report 1s the proposed contract with the Inland Mediation
Beard and the original contract with the Hest End Mediation Board.
REWMENDA710N: It 1s recomrcnded tnrt the City Council: (1) adopt the
attached es_ ution approving VC contract with Inland Mediation Board; (2)
authorize the mayor to execute said contract; and, (3) authorize $875 to be
allocated from the Coam:nity D.:veiopment Block Grant fund to pay for the
contractual fee difference on the remaining seven (7) months.
Contract
J ?
•
` by
� •Y
3'
�Ji•
• RESOLUTION NO. * /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE COUNTY OF SAN BEhNARDINO,
THE CITY OF SAN BERUARDIN0, AND INLAND MEDIATION BOARD, A
NON- PROFIT ORGANI2ATI0N, FOR THE PURPOSES OF ESTABLISHING
A CONTRACTUAL ARRANGEMENT PRCVTDING FOR A FAIR HOUSING
PROGRAM TO THE RESIDENTS OF ThE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamorga did enter into an agreement
formally with West End Mediation Board on the 3rd day of June, 1982, to
provide for services; and
WHEREAS, this agreement was pursuant to Section 570304 (h) (2) (111)
of Federal Regulations to order to implement strategy for increasing the
choice of housing opportunities fo• law to roderate income persons, including
members of minority groups and te. ale households and including efforts to
achieve special desegregation of such housing opportunities and actions to
affirmatively further fair housing; and
WHEREAS, the West End Mediation Board has changed Its name to Inland
® Mediation Board; and
WHEREAS, Inland Mediation Board has entered into a new contractual
arrangement with the County of San Bernardino and the City of San
Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to enter into a contractual arrangement to
continue to provide the services which benefit the city in pursuing matters of
fair housing.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the Ciry of Rancho Cucamonga does
resolve as follows:
SEC11011 1: Approve contract w4 *' nniard Mediation Board which will
supersede aTl contrct agreements Detwefn the City of Ranch Cucamonga and the
West End Mediation Bard dated June 3, 1987, from that period subsequent to
the date of thi, agreement
SECTION 2: That the City Council of the City .,f Rancho Cucamonga
direct tht Mayor to execute agreement with Inland Mediation Board
SECTION 3: That the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
direct ttTa—r—TTF75760 be allocated from the Community Development Block Grant
Fund for the additional cost during the remaining oeriod or this contract
agreement
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of January, 1983.
71
',art
4'
' A G R E E M E N T
THIS AGRE!.1Mlr is male and entered into thfa day oe
1982, 1r1 and letween the Cmrtutity Development (M;,W -ion of t3:.Q c" cr Sea,
BeraiardirD, hereinafter referred to as "Q'IIiISS101 ", the C>=: 6• C,:I
BER\ARDIVD, hereinafter rofdrred to a3 "CDC =*, the City of Rana!_* A:av:=5W
hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and the Inland pcdiatian Board, (,armory/ .ndwn'
as west End 'ledration Board) a non - profit ornanizatian hereinafter raferred to s•,
"BOARD "; for purnoses of establishing and implementing a Fair Housing Program ca
service residents of the above referenced areas
W I T N E S F E T U
VrOO BAS, pursuant to ; ection 570 301, (h) (2) ULU of the federal Reg=ioticra,
the Cormission, Coranty, and City aro mandated to implement a straragy at•
increasing the housUV opporttniti3s for maWers of mirvrity grcu;a. an3
fu,ale -head households, and incluitng e.ffor.3 to achieve spaUal deconcanr=at1c•�c
of such housing opportunitlPs and art',tns to affirmatively furrher f.•ir hobs s
anal:
UXER;A5, the Commission, Cornty. ri.ty and Board prcpou to prtvjd, c!we
m3r:nitrt with a 1.,_al offico f07 roceiving assistance in resolvL"�g compiasnt;.
with regard to housing disc.rimin,trrn and lam + mlord /tenant prcbl.cna; arm
• TV=rNS, the Cmmission, C(Arty, C. , tad Board reccgnizos Nis need to
inform the public of the Lew wiLn regard to hooting dis=l:mUatien,
landlord /tenant rights, and building and safety laws in order to faster
affitativc action to oliminato housing discrLminatirnf and
W aMEAS, the Cmnissirs, County, City and Board roc gdze the need to
enccurace the resolution of oorplaints tllttxgh the process of ardiaticn, and
t11112m s, the Ca3niYaion, County and city have received a= funds firm tine
United states Department of Housug .,rd Urber Developnent (heraL.attar refeaed
to as "1RA ") to be used for the in ;)14m ntatiot and mainten rco of a Pair Aocsirq
Prog -am; and
t!:H, 1110liEi0AE, the Cm, mission, County, City acid poaEd, *,r and in
=:zieeraticn of the nvtval prcnias and agreearnts trim «n etn_.t.ianea, c4' agr *
as follows:
r
II. 'ate cC=mLgsi=,, :C
ty, aSd Cty ir..ec'.'e the right 1p kev3Cw and
Ax -,=Me Me —him and AecirS.ms related to all applicable raTZaticns. 0
2. Torch Sarty agmw to if Smmify, 8e£enl, and sage ham �-- the other
acY and .all claias, losses s or
+�*t� oz viatq£ud =t�o ys
•ate, or cm lc-5e In the pecic==ce of this cmtrct_
11111 !Jill 1111 IM1911 I! I
-3- Ni=E29 xala y. bmatits, and full. xewvrzibjjjty Sae ils stf;
'G rJ k=5 an to neg7t:ate Cl. xn q, il' C8 of A3m7;mimtjm
.a bin ud if =r=oewtfal SHfO- Cn;e; for fiwu r
i=- tigatim to State Dgp=t ms ai Pair r-t., la,' t adf Horsing;
•�:ac acs _
h. P-ep=7A-pg Monthly stiti.^.tivd relo fc the CbL=ty, rtizimssjou
rat :CZy co the Saabs of czq%"rts/gLez im=, be status Of
rs,e;- "d n.ta..•a fr.Stim as to c� asd
regmeuted by the Est, catty u.- City;
]c=rag utal;sstops pe; Year to Info= the cat -e r M=tT as t) its rigtSS and reseatsibiiitfes =a= state and
Fwa=- Imes vrth repeat to fair hccsing;
2
A.
0
r,
J. ULW=Lmting noterials to the publi,: regarding state and Federal
laws with respect to fair hewing; z
Y.. Acting as referral agency for those persons who require technical
or professimel in£o=tion as dap be avaLable from existtrg
camriity organizations or other institutiars: and
1. Handling all ad- Anistrative duties prstaininy to a=u i costs of
operation and paying all bills.
6. In =mfderatim for the cervices Perfonaed by the Hoard herevre - -r tie
Co is County and City shall fund the activities of trr Hcrni
this Agreement using tie method of prymmat dmc ibed below
IS= Cr F:,YF¢27r
7te total . •dract snxnt for this project is $35,091. 71C allocation
bred d " 1s':s:
f: / 3
City of Pmrino C=m=ga 66
or $ 2,100.00•
City of San Bernardino 351
or 12,282.00
Couty of San Heaardim 591
Total
or 20 709.00
Allocation
35,091:00
,
Upm execution of t:1m contract, the
CUcraiss`_m, Cbmty rat, the City
vat pay according to tlr• folla:lnl cizeu e:
First Prrvnt - (After Ex¢ruticin of Contract)
City of RM&D Cucavra
1,225.00•
Canty of San Bernardino
$10,355.00
City of Smn Bernardino
6,141.00
,7L U 1721__00
Second Pay_ent - FeSnnary '_, 1983
Couty of San Darnaniino
$ 5,178.00
City of San Bernardino
3,070.00
Cie/ of Fmrin Cuc =x;7
438.00
8,66W C,696.U0
Final Pwrcmt - Acri1 1, 1983
,C�—nty of San Farrardim
$ 5,176.03
City of San Bernardiro
3,071.CP
Citj Cf Pond» CU, -Mrx;a
437.00
81G34.Co 8,48:100
P:J:_2T 5(:Ty f i:ai 70-AL C:m",Cr 1.vL%?Ir $35,091.00
f: / 3
r'
The inland 15^_diaticn Yand has already received 51,2:5.00 from the
City of Panrho Cucamonga based m precious contracts. T}.,a $1,225.00
constitubs the first payment for the City of Poncho Cucavcoga.
these fuxls will be used for initial start gy=p costs such as office
rental, installation of tape and utilities. On going costs of
service to be Pro414ed under this contract are also included i i the
first installment.
An invoice is required for payinant of the initial start up costs. Tre
Board will be required to provide Proper took -up docunenta�4cn to
suPport aLl oPenditures prior to dirburr meet of the second and feel
Payments.
7. Tliis Agremmt mmy be ameaxled or mndiffm only by written rgre=- -nt
signed by all Parties; and failure on tho girt of either party to
enforce any provision of this AgreFs t shsll not .be canstnaed as a
waiver of the right to compel enforcement al provisicn or
provisions.
8. All participants of this : •reereat mist act in ar=rda>co with
Moccutive Omer• No. 11246 which pro- that no person shall be
diccrlminated against on tl:e basis of raw, color, religion, sem, or
national origin in all phases of employment daring the perfo=== of
foMrally assisted contracts.
9. This Agrsment shall be in effect from December 1, 1982 and acnewable
after July 1, 1903, unless tatandad, mended or tennir_sted by matual
agreement.
10 7nis contract shill suoarsede the agreement between ttc City of Ranc
Cucamnqa and the Hest End Mediation 0eard dated June 3. 1982 for the
period subsequent to the date of this agreement.
L 4
0
0
El
IN InTNMW WIEMOF, the parties have eaused tWa Agrom=t to be rxecuted
a- of the day and year first vritter above.
BY
Agency mJ C s Legal
Comsel
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dy.
Cc=ty Comsa
c ty r—i .ttorney
Pj-if Vm
11/O3/82/jj
�6
s
ca%M ITk DEVEI- DPMFHR =44ISSICN
OF m C11Y OF Skli BEF.11ARDINO -
BY
CITY OF RANCHO CUTt'•T1M
LtiTAt9 DS@I MOM BOARD
BY
ChnJ-=M of
BY
Exc Vt1Ve DirCCtor
f etu.,
A G R E E M E N T
Tits Agreement is berneen the test End Mediation Board and the
City of Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of utilizing COMunity Dcvelop-
ment Block Grant (C.O.B.G.) funds to establish a Fair Housing Program to
service the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
This Agreement is made and entered into this S, I day of
i,, ,,. 1982, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter
reterre to as "City ") and the Wes; End Mediation Board, a non - profit
organization (hereinafter referred to as "Board ")
W i T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 570.304(h)(2)(iii) of the Federal
Regulations, the City is mandated to implement a stratcay for increasing
the choice of housing opportunities for lei- and moderate - Income persons
Including members of minority groups and female -head households, and
ircludino efforts to achieve spatial deconcentration of such housing
opportunities and actions to affirmatively further fair housing; and
WHEREAS. the City and Baard propose to provide the community
eith a localized location for receiving assistance in resolving complaints
with regard to housing discrimination and landlord /tenant problems; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need to inform the public of
the law with regard to housing discrimination, landlord /tenant rights,
and buiidino and safety laws in order to foster affirmative action to
eliminate housing discrimination; and
WHEREAS the City recognizes the need to encourage the resolu-
tion of complaints through the process of mediation; and
iMEREAS, the City has received C.O B.G. funds from the U.S
Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter referred to as
"HUD ") to be used for She implementation and maintenance of a Fair
Housing Prog ^am; and
WHEREAS. The Board is a California non - profit corporation
organized to help people resolve landlorditemant related disputes through
inforred mediation w'th the help of cmr.unity volunteers witn the vied
in mind of preventing or reducing the nunter of disputes joint into the
judicial system.
?1N. 'nEaErORE, the City and Boarl, for and In consideration
of the mutual promise- and agreements herein contained, do agree as
follo4s
1. The Cibf reserves the right to review and approve action and
® decisions related to all noplicable rpnnlationl
5-7
2 Each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the
other party from any and all claims, losses, or dariages occurring or re-
sulting fro,, any negligent or wrongful act or omission of its officers,
agents, or employees in the performance of this contract. `
3. The City recognizes the Boar as an independent i,on- profit
organization ane agrees to cooperate in protecting its Image as a politi-
cally neutral organization
4 The Board shall be responsible for the following
for its staff; a Hiring, salary, berefits, and full responsibility
b Training volunteers to handle mediation sessions, per-
form telephone counseling, and initiate complaint resolution;
c Making an effort to negotiate or mediate a remedy
between landlords and tenants;
d Accepting complaints from individuals alleging dis-
crimination in housing;
e Making an effort to negotiate or mediate cases of
discrimination; and if unsuccessful referring the case for further
investigation and thorough analysis to the State Department of Fair
Erroloyment and Housing;
f publicizing the existence of the Coard throughout
the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
g. Preparing monthly statistical re pert for the City
on the number of complaints /questions, the status of th eir resolutions,
and related information as required and requested by the ,Yty;
h Conducting one housing workshop per year to inform
the entire cortmuni ty as to its rights and responsibilities under State
and Federal laws with respect to fair housing;
i Uisseminating materials to the public regarding
State and Federal housing laws;
1 Acting as referral agency for those persons who require
technical or professional information as My he available from existing
community oroanizations or other institutions; and
k Handling all -dninistra ti ve duties pertaining to
accrued costs of noer 0011 and Pa'•ing all bills
5 In consideration for the serviers Cerforred by the Coard
herv!Onepr. the Cit/ 1h,10 qnd trc )Ctivities of the Dolyd under this
,gree, -ent in the d,nount -:f 21 C-1 •
V1i�
i
6 This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written
agreement signed by both parties; and failure on the oart of eitoer party
to enforce any provision of this Agreement siiall not be construes as a
waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision or provisions
7 In the event HUD disapproves of the use of C D.B.G funds
to implement this Agreement, the City may, upon giving written notice
to all other parties of its intention to do so, inrediately termlr
this Agreement Upon the event of any such termination, the Roar, i
be entitled to receive compensation In a total amount to be determ.ned
by the following formula:
Compensation equals (a) number of days between connencement
of fiscal year and notice of termination tines (x) budget
amount divided by (i) total number of days in fiscal year
6 All participants of this Agreement must act in a,cordance
with Executive Order 11246 which provides that no person shall be dis-
criminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national
origin in all phases of employment during the performance of federally
assisted contracts
9 This Agreement shall be in operatica for the fiscal year
1982 -83 and shall terminate on June 30, 1983, unless extended by mutual
agreement
• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed of tt^ day and year first written above
WEST END MEDIATION BOARD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By J �'....!' • /.' i
ttg or
C "JK zwblAau, City
Clark 5T,
By
City Attorney
`J_9
f � ,
r
CMMIJiTY OEVELOPHEHT BLOCK. GPAIIT PROGRAM: Revised Budget (5125182) '
'Percentages have beer rounded and do not precisely total 100::
amounts are based on estimates and may vary slightly.
Zi
' 0
Program
Amount
1.
Horth Town Streets
$120,000
33.3:
Pb3se III
2,
lleighbonccod Center
S 81.0J0
22.5%
Expansion
3
Housing Rehabilitation
$ 84,000
23.3%
4.
Contingency
$ 15,287
4 2%
S.
Local Costs - Program
Implementation
(o) Administration
S 61255
1.7:
(b) Program ilanagenent
$ 51,358
(c) Fair Housing Services
(Hest End Mediation Board)
.S�2 100
6'
5360-000
'Percentages have beer rounded and do not precisely total 100::
amounts are based on estimates and may vary slightly.
Zi
' 0
CITY OF RANCHO CUC"TONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: January 5, 1983 "4
TO: City Council and City Manager Fj
FROM: Lloyd 8. Hobbs, City Engineer
SUBJECT: ROUTE 30 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
Attached for Council execution is an agreement between the City
and the San 9ernardino Associated Governments to particpate in
the cast of retalnin5 a consultant to assist in the preparation
of the Routn 30 Implementation Plan mandated by the California
Transportation Committee (C.T.C.).
As you know, the L.T.C. retained Route 30 under the condition
that local agencies along the corridor develop a plan for the
financing and construction of the facility. Thia plan which was
originally due for completion by December 30, 1982 has received a
one year extension In order to develop a response to the L.T.C.
mandate, Cities benefiting from the facility formed the Route 30
Group under the sponsorship of the San Bernardino Associated
Governments. This group is currently chaired by Mayor Mikels.
The Route 30 Group determined that the assistance of a consultant
would be required to complete studies to determine the type of
facility and financial mechanisms for its construction After a
lengthy interview process, the firm of Parsons, Brinckerhoff,
puade and Douglas. Inc. in association with Al Hollinder, Arthur
Bauer and Associates and Robert Harmon 6 Associates were select-
ed. Funding for the consultant 1s covered in the subject agree-
ment, as well as the basic Scope of Services.
The cost dfstr4butlon between cities is roughly based on the
relative population and lane miles through each city, The cost
distribution has been approved by the full Route 30 Group.
Funds for the project should be drawn from the Systems Develop•
ment fund.
continued
MY Eaarccft Staff 2eccrt
"ate 30 Iapleaentatlmm Plaw Parc�cipatfom 6�yresxevS
Jamaary S, 19 3
Page 2 _
KECOMEltallom
It 1s recMumeed tda5 CaaTCII amt%or/ze the n3yor to sign the
agreea vat mo their DOW saS allmcate SZO.M fraa "t systems
ffevetaprsevt faad fir tAw Mavao* 6mc.cwmgo share,
_tfespeGtfdllq s wed,
LB • as
kttac"aerot
7, y,
r-.1
CA
A*
AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION
ROUTE 30 INPLEHENTATION PLAN
'his Agreement, made and entered into this _._day of
1983 by and between hereinafter
referred to as AGENCY and the Sa., Bernardino Associated
Governments, hereinafter referred to as SANBAG
WITHESSETH:
WHEREAS, the California Transportation Commiss'on has
mandated locAl governmental jurisdictions within the Route 30
Corridor .o develop an implementation plan for the development of
a transportatio.. facility within the corridor; and
Wr1E4EAS, the Route 30 Group was formed under he
spoisor,,Mp cf SARBAG to develop slid Plan; and
WHEREAS, _
Gout-! 30 Group and
plan, and
is a member of the
enef its from the efforts to generate said
WHEREAS, it is has been deemed necessary for the Route
3r Group to retain the services of a consultant to assist in the
developnent of the Route 30 I- plementation Plan; and
0 WHERCAS, S VIBAG has agreed subject to sufficient funding
0
to act as lead agent for the Implementation P1 , and as such, to
contract with a consultant to perform neces:ary work to develop
the plan
i NUW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed a: follows:
SARBAG SHALL:
1. Act as lead agency in contracting and administrating
with the firms of PARSONS, GRINCKERHOFF, QUAGE AND DOUGLAS, INC.,
AL HOLLINDEN, ARTHUR BAUER & ASSOC., ROBERT J. HARHON &
ASSOCIATES to develop an Implementation Plan for Route 30 as
described in Exhibit "A" entitled Scope of Services which 1;
attached hereto and Incorporated herelu by reference.
2. Participate towards the total cost of preparation of
the imilementation plan as specified in Exhibit "B" which is
attached nereti and incorporated herein by reference.
3. Hold all funds for completion of said consultant';
contract and make progress payments as provided for within said
contract.
4 Provide liaison with the Route 30 Group to insure
timely compliance with the provisiuns or said consultant's
contract.
G1�'
AGENCY SMALL:
1. Pay to SAYBAG S for its share of
the total cost of the consultant's coniiact for the Route 30
Implementation Plan. Payment shall be submitted in two pay -ients,
the first payment on or before February 1!), 1983 and the second
payment on or before August 15, 1983. The first payment shall
not be less than fifty percent (50X) of the total amount
2 Designate an Agency Representative and a Technical
Representative tc act on its behalf to facilitate community
interaction and review of the plan alternatives for facility type
and financing.
3 Make all efforts to insure the timely review of al'
relevant material to maintain the project schedule as outlined in
Exhibit "A ".
4 Review and comment on all relevant stages of the
plan development and consider adoption of the final
Implementation Action Plan.
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED THAT:
1 SANDAG shall issue a Notice to Proceed on the
consultant's contract only upon determination of the Ro.ite 30
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
AGENCY
by
SAN BERIIARDINa ASSOCIATED GOVERi1NENrs
/%Y
&OF ira is rO :O M
wt
n— Vii.. V �..
aw
Group that ,ufflcient funds have been deposited or agreed to be
deposited to guarantee payment for services rendercd. SAN8At
shall insure in its contract dith consultant that there will be
no contractual obltgatlon imposed on SANBAG or any participat ng
agencies in the event insufficient funds are committed to pernit
carrying out the consultant's proposed work.
2. In the event that sufficient funds are n..t received
to complete the plan or the contract is terminated for caise,
funds not expended shall be returned to the AGENCY to proportion
to the amount contributed by each agency to the date of
termination.
3. This contract shall inure to the benefit of and be
binding upon the successors ane assigns of both parties.
IN WITe,.= WHEREOF, said parties have executed this
agreement on the r,t_ first hereinaboie written.
ATTEST:
ATTEST:
AGENCY
by
SAN BERIIARDINa ASSOCIATED GOVERi1NENrs
/%Y
&OF ira is rO :O M
wt
n— Vii.. V �..
aw
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SP.RVICES
Task 1: Identify FLCRIty Connect Desten Ootem and Costs
poineca t Create a set of specific route davelo,oment /phming options in rap form
exparigng on the results of the vast study but focussing on specific facility configuration.
timing, and access options at the local community leveL Determine approximate facility
development cots for each option as targets for finmtcitg strategies to be developed In
Task 2.
Activ(tlese Activities under this tact., will comprise a concentrated effort to move
as qulekTm posslble from previous flmdi � an the co.Tidor to specific fee ty options o[
potential local InteresL
Startup actitdti" would IncILdet (1) a brief review of the pmt documentation on the
project, culmina.ing In a very brief synopsis of principal flndings as they relate to (a) the
acknowledged transportation role a developed Route 30 would play In the circulation system
of the West Valley area, and (b) the pmt analyses, deliberations, and Information sources
that may be tapped to avold duplication of effort In this study; (2) detailed consultations
with Caltrnns and City and County representatives to update and quickly document the
status of the right -af -way, along the entire corridor; (3) amc.nbly of a comprehensive,
annotated Ust of all aerial photography and mapping available along, the corridor; and (s)
ctoiled consultstlonr with Caltrans on the pmt thinkfog on the type of freeway (e)ovd•ed,
depressed, at- grade, etc.) Route 30 had been contemplated to be along Its length.
?n Initial series of ,ntcrViews will be held with local agency representatives at the City
L'agineer /City 3lamger level, with early participation at the decision- mnkcr'evel highly
en^ouraged. These Interviews would be designed to: (1) quickly Identify and oocement
the up- to-the- minute thinking of each agency regarding what It hopes to achie;u nr attain
within Its own jursidiction from Route 30; (2) quickly identify the formal status of Ocute 30
In existing city circulation or tro•sportat(on elements or other official polLy docume•tu,
Incluting any planning details reflecting expectations or desires about interchange
loestions, functional characteristics, connecthgty to development areas, etc.; (3) Ident.fy
for Incorporation Into t;.e Initial alternatives set any local Ideas, regardless of source.
concerning expressed preferences or concerns regaraitg how and when Route 30 would be
developed :hroug): their communities; (4) identify and verify any future faciL'tles Intended
to Intersect Route 30 that might Influence route design options; (S) identify specific route
configuration alternatives senior staff or decision-makers have in mind for examination
under this project; (0) Identify major generators or specific community areas whose accessi-
E lily to Route 30 or whose Impacts from Route 30 are expected to be of special Importance
to the local community; and (7) document the anticipated timing and magnitude of major
anticipated new Land developments in cacti jurfadictlon.
Further consultations would then be held with City Engineers •, quickly identify from a
traffic management /traffic ptanning viewpoint the current status and future plans for
existing arterial streets ( particuarly Baseline and Highland) that are currently on Route 30.
This will Include present std ultimate right -of -way, cross - section. and lano configurations.
Identification of controUlng intersections and capacity constraints, predominant si-,nat
phase and cn :lcal movements, etc. This understanding tviO be key In developing specific
design options, particularly where phased improvements call for developing only a portion
of the corridor. Signal interconnect status and plans stall sL ^o be documented where
relevant.
,o7
With the Move as; background resource Informa'lon, specific facility Cesign options vould
be developed. To this point, previous work has identified the " upper limits" of corrit or
development recommended by major sectors of the corridor and has recommended it - eneral
strategy of phasing from west to cast and "laterally" from arterial to freeway In tha
sections whete freeway[ development for ultimate conditions hns been recommended. To
avoid "reinventirg the wheel," it is prudent to accept those "upper limits" as upper bounds
on the level of facility to be ultimdtcly developed under ray option suggested for cons: 'Jera -
tion In this study, barring Pity strong local reason to :he contrary that might ba brought dp
In the consult[ :ions mentioned aWve. Within those limits, though, (1) the widest possible
latitude In formulating options should be allowed at this point, and (2) the level of detail
should b brought Into sharp focus at the local level. Tno potential for Innovation in this
project Is key at this juncture. While it is Impossible to predict the exact set of options
that would be produced under this task, there are a number of degrees of freedom that
can be Identified. The following list is not exhaustive an•1 is only a sample. Varyln; these
elements could lead to distinctly different options or suboptions.
1. For freeways, the number and location of Interchanges, the configuration of Interchanges
(diamond, clot orleef, trumpet, eta).
2. Again, for freeway.[, whether the freeway will be dspresseo with overcrossings at-
grade, eleoatec' with undcrerossings at- grade, or at -grado with overcrossings elevated,
etc.
7. For so -called "arterial," whother access can be gained to the new a: terial only at
significant cross - streets (and, If so, how many and which ones), or whether access :s
available from any intersecting street.
L For freeways, whit it streets will overcross the freeway and which will be closed.
S. whether reversible lanes have any applicability within the corridor for any segment
entire consideration.
S. Tra vitlon between segments of differing cross -section or functional type of farrPty.
7. Design standards, and vchlca mix Intended to use specific lanes or tht facility In
toto.
S. Frontage roads: with expressway or freeway options, should frontage reads be
developed, how would they be Integrated.
For Its' a " a key element Is phasing. while the Initial thinking or, specific route concept
design o wtll be focussed on ultimate facility configuration, Initial phasing
stratec' to card those ultimate options should be Identified at this point, If only In
nary, It is Important for local feedback to alternative design concepts to be
able to Isu..,zd how the route would /could be developed In stages, what the faculty would
look like and how It would operate with the existing system at each stage, and what the
Implications would be if route development did not proceed to the next stage for an extended
period of time. Also, conceptual phasing will be Important In the consideration of local
financing strategy options In Task 2.
It is Important that an option would be defined by a sketch map of the entire corridor
showing actual concept centerline for inch now roadway proposed. with diagrammatic
illustration of any ramp connections. Alon; each new segment the type of facility, type •
-3-
of aces;, and number of lane would be shouvn. An Initial concept cross - section would be
Identified for such type of section for irrtial costing purposes. A supplemental sheet v
i" focussing on each teen' jurisdjetioc could be appended as appropriate.
Costs associated with each option would be developed by applying appropriate unit costs
to the various lengths of facility proposed by type. This would be supplemented by lump such as sum or
changa other
tructures, drainage co any special special carthwor,k etc. over ^_rosdng or Inter-
Product: Working Paper No, 1, Route 70 Deslgn Ootlons. containing the following:
— B. jef summary of the background information Identified above
— hlap sets and narrative on each eptlon, Incl•iding ultimate configuration,
possible phasing approaches, and cost estimates.
pollcy_lntps utt -tho sooner this is done in he process, he greater the opportunity for
and
Information need not be timebuilding
nsumingt specifics
arsoins Brinckerhoff hss already reviewed ceground
majority of the noute 00 documents to conjunction with other work the firm has done In
-San Bernardino Count the West, County hreal emphasis in this task is oe development hle
of the The options, reflecting the greatestdors.
amount of imagination in putting together plausible and practical systems of high level
In the care dor. high "igh Flow Arterial- cop cp as have appropriate cetly been tested In Orcnzc
County, will be considered in options for Route 00, as will a full range of fronway /expressway/
parkway design options for the high demand sections of the co"Wor,
E
GD
10
0!
Task 2: Identify Local Plnnnclm[ Strategy O0tIPn1
Pu.•zose: Assemble all previously developed f1rumnlal concepts for the Route 30
Corridor, augment fhb 11sUng with others w. ".Ich maybe conceived by the study team.
Activities: Significant work has been accomplished previously In the conceptual
planning for the Route 30 Corridor. Such work has encompassed both development of
design - onzepts and strategies for funding and financing corridor Implementation. The
principal Activity In this task will be to generate a complete listing and document ttion of
potential mechanisms to pay for the construction of the Route 30 facility.
Initially, ulternativcs considered In the Route 30 Study conducted for the California
Transpormtlon Commission will be arrayed. M,tr y traditional and several Innovntivo
approaches wero documented, and these will forat the core listing. It is clear that locally -
based financial strategies acceptable to the public, the legislature, and the local
urisdlctlons will eventually be required to fund the corridor. Thus, we will concentrate
on augmenting the core list with techniques various members of the study team have
developed and/or utilized In previous work throughout the United States for local revenue
haneratlon. At this point In the process, we will consider a1: potential techniques as a
means of beginning the cotsensus building process with r fall slate of options. As the
process proceeds, many concepts will quickly drop out of further consideration as "fatal
flaws" are noted by participants to the consensus building process. lye exnect the bnrlo
list to encompass Individual sources for generating local revenue, includiht, for example,
the followings
Motor fuel tax
Road tolls S
Transit term (where transit may be Integrate) In the
hl;hway concept
Parking fees
Vehicle registration fees
Vehicle property tax
Sales tax
Commercial development foes
Industrial development fees
Residential development fees
Benefit assessments
Personal in:omo tax
Wa0a tax
PayroL' tax
Business license fees
Sever once tax
Excise taxes
Vehicle coda fines
Product: ivorklr r Paper Yo. 2, Local Plnnncing Oetlone. w1U D t the principal
product of tau task. the do not expect thatirts paper with contaln an ovulation of the
approprlatenesr of the various sources, since we wish to fnitlate the Co..rn -us bufldln;
process with little o: no Influance from file consultant. Wv may, however. Irdlento the
rclativ eapablllq of various sources to ;cncrato revenue, bascu on oasumptions rc;arcin;
the siz of the relevant generation base.
Otscteslon: lye Ju not envision this task to consume significant time or budget
since our review md,catcs that a gocd bnsa of analytical work exists. In addition, oar
-to-
ll�
\J
Y
recent work has resulted In a Imge volume of source materiel on : evenuo scurces and
magnitudes In Southern California, z
7 1
Ib
Task Ot Establish Community Consensus Pramancric
Putposeit Develop and document the consensus building process which will be
Implementea early In the project.
Actividest The principal activity of this task will 1e to determine and define the
most appropriate mechanisms fordeveicping eensansus alocng Jurisdictions having mfferent
objectives (some imps conflicting) regarding the implementation of Route 30. Given I"
controversial and multi- Jurisdie•ional nature of Route 30, tht first step In definlnq the
appropriate consensus building process will be to develop bas i understanding and agreement
on the process to be used (i.e., we must first achieve aonsorstc on tha process of consensus
building, not unlike the Initial determination of the shape of the table to be utilized In
multi - national diplomatic debati). The second step will be to do lment the approacr in a
working paper which will guide the process.
Products Working Paper No. S, Community Consensus Eramew. rk.
D— lsctxslnns The proms of achieving agreement on complex decisions con take men)
More from from widespread (costly) public Involvement to political iiijollag In smoke
filled rooms. While we do not uniformlyy advocate either extreme, we bell Iva that the
political arena Is the more critical eettlng for afriving at the definition of an "action
agenda" for implementation of Route 00. This belief is the principal reason `or Including
Al Holllnden on the team. Often referred to as "Mr. Transportation" In Callfc•nla politicad
circles, Al has years of experience —and a significant number of successes —to tss[ify to
his capaolHty!n working In Just this sort of environment. He Is well- known, retracted,
and trusted throughout the Southern California political setting, particularly amo,,q elected
officials. Al will be 4eslgnated as the official consensus expeditor on the project t ,am.
We believe that the evaitil ation of credible analytical work and sensitive political `,rokcring" 9&
Is the key to the deva �pment of Implementable recommendations for moving forwart: on
.^.outs 00.
A newly- emerging line of thinking In the area of consensus building for project devetcomcnt
has been well- received recently, and we believe It has merit. Its central tenet is that true
consensus Is initially Impossible to achieve where entrenched and conflicting objectives
come Into play. However, TFG not necessary to cchleve true consensus in order to move
forward with the development of a project only "Informed consent; all parties do not
nceJ :o niuTco, but each must perceive that ocneflls to be gained from the project sill
accrue In his or her direction. It Is this undatstandlnq that wa expect to achieve on the
Route Ja project, and It Is In this way that we define the term "consensus."
Nina jurisdictions will be directly Impacted by the solution (or non - solution) to the
Route JO Corridor problem. No two Jurlsdietlons will be affneted In a =ctly the some
manner[ impacts which are regarded as positive In one Jurlsdtetion may be regarded as
negative in another jurisdiction. Major concerns in some JuMclicitons are of little or no
Importance In other Jurisdictions. Although Routo Jb Is primarily an cost -west corridor
and will greatly facilitate traffic movements In those directions, It has the potential to
greatly allovna•0 traffic alonq major northaouth arterials and collectors, especially In
Claremont, Upland, and San Bernardino. Impacts on Industrial, commercial, and
residential growth will be carefully watched by the Jurisdictions, particularly as to flow
thmr own city and their Immedlato neighborinq jurisdleltons arc Impacted.
Is it Impossible to get agreement between nine furlsdictions" the not only believe that is
Is possiole to achieve ronsdnsus acro-o nq to the Octet definition, but we believe that it !s
_1:_
mandatory in ordnr to Insure project success. lye believe that there-are enough potential
positive Impacts and common benefits from such a project to form a base upon which a
9 consensus can be developed.
',"he consensus building process is a two-way exchange and the Information gathered •ill
Its extremely valuable to transportation planners and facility desigmus. Early information
regarding concerns relative to negat, a impacts can be utilized to mitigate and solve
problems that might be very costly if unveiled later In the process.
The consensus development task is a process that differs greatly from the trodltlone'
citizen particlpation process. However, materials developed for this task, and Infer ration
gained from Us participants may be extremely useful at a later date to assist In completim
the citizen participation activities mandated by state and federal low.
Specifically, we envision the consensus building process opc.ating in the fallowing way:
— The consoroto expeditor (CE) WIU meet with the Route 30 Corridor Committee.
He will discuss fudff if (up to data state and federal projections) And discuss a
mcrn of potential local financing methods. The major gaol of the meotin. tvW
be to gather Information from the Committee regarding, concerns relative to
both the freeway Itself a.• well as financing the freeway. Discussion will also
deal with the Impacts if no facility Is built.
The political representatives of the corridor jurisdictions will be asked to rest a
meeting (study session) In their city Involving the CE where the format would
be slmilat to above. It is recommended that council members, planning
O commissions, and key city staff be present. Represontatives of the chambers of
commerce and other organizatiors could also be Invited. The CE will also meet
.rith the two County Supervisors that represent this Area and their staffs.
El
— There will be a continuous Interaction and exchange of Information between the
technical study teem, the CE, and other study staff throughout the course of
the study.
— The political mpresentatives on the Route 30 Corridor Study Committee Will be
used as the pi imary conduits for the continuing information orogram. Clear,
concise reports will be prepared by the CE which outline not only progress out
problems encountered as wall. Letters or memos :vlll be prepared for these
representative: to transmit the reports and, thus, keep the opinion- leader
segment of the community Informed. The CE will meet at periodic intervals
with the Corridor Committee.
— The CE will be available to assist the Com• dtteo members Whenever prob,oms
arise.
Objectives which will be achieved through this consensus oavelopment process are:
o To .other Information and mitigate :he elected officials concerns;
• To orovide clear, concise Informat'on that will allow elected officials to mike
rational decisions; and
-13-
7�
To provide Intormatton that will a.Tow elected offte'atts wt cat' to &fW C.s�
actions and Support, but to beaomu advocates a4 the proaCM ffa 14SV,9pv;%a=
backing by the elected ottic1219 and other opinlon leaders Mitt prowfdj ttas
shlp to Insure the atceese of this study,
Task 4; Concoct Benefit/Burden Anaivsfs
Par000e, 10rtlfy who benefits from the iml lamentation of Route 30. :,,d who bedrs
the fin# mcidenc t of alternative sources of financing. This Identification will prow -do t`e
primary basis for evaluting and recommending flntmcing strategies keyed to alternative
design options for he ca.-ridor.
Anrivitiese We will prepare an analysis for csch financing source being consiCcred
so thaw the parncipants in the cor :ur= building process will have a basis for determining
the equity Implications of tech. In addition, we will describe the relationship of each
revenue source to transportation benefits and to Incidence of fiscal burden, and we will
ertimatd u range of rate, and total revenues over it pre - determined planning period.
Product- working Paper No. 4, Benefit/Blirdon AnaNsls, will describe the financial
et: nacre. -utics of potential local revenue sources.
Diset=%icm: Emw nei on the Identity of Lvneflclaries of Improved transportation
sxrvicc must balanced by the practical consideration or whether charges can be levied
on certain groups for L ".e b• ef1U thm/ have reeeiv.td. Ths task will begin with funding
and financing options documented in Task 2. These mechanisms will be classified In goeator
detail regarding the relationship between final Incidence of tht transportation burden and
enjoyment of benefits.
The question of final incidence of burden, or cost, reserves special emphasis, particularly
with respect to certain types of charges affecting rusines, as apposed to Individual free me.
("Plead Incidence -cfers to the firm or Individual ultimately experiencing a radiation in
Income as the result of a charge or tac.) A case In point Is the use of development 'ces.
Classics], economic theory would suggest that development fees are passed back to the
landowner rather than passed forward In the form o' higher prices. In practice, In highly
Innittlonar/ times, and given that the real estate market Is an "imperfect market" In the
sense of buyer and seller having equal Information, the charge of development fees may
be passed forward in the form of higher prices. Dot s theory and practical obscrvauo.s
confirm ttst :vhether development fees are passed tackward or forward, they arc lot a
levy on developers' profits. This fact must be understood before either the equity or the
political acceptauillty of development fees can fully be evaluated.
A similar type of problem exists In the allocation of any benefit created by a transoortation
Improvement. Dirac, benefits from local Imorovemants can be assigned to a gcographlrauv-
bounded group of residents, workers, or property owners with reasonablo precision. A
reeicnal facility, howeve,, will create benefits to sciernl variously- defined geographical
groups, beth users and non -users. This creates the problem of determining not so much
who benefits, but by how muen car;, ocnefits, relative to the other.
The analysis AiU explore alternative methods of allocating ocnefits among groups rargmg
f -om local beneficiaries of new necess (primarily landowners) to all regional remdents and
businesses. Such allocations will not only help detarmme appropriate burden levuls.'mt
appropriate flnunemg mechanisms, as well. in tills way, the issue of cost and bcnctit
allocation will be appro:cncd from both directions.
The analysis in Tssk 4 will both provide nwncr• enl ,
Implications of these results. While it s expretc,
necessanly be accomplished through the polio: if ,
of this task will .usut in elanfyim; the rholces and
alternative fimnem; scenarios.
_ta_
/ 1
esuits and an evaluation of th-: , alter:
L a filial all, 'n of burden mil
1. the in i tapered ns oart
IM Invotw, a m scicct,r� waorz
We expect to classify beneficiary groups and burden group. In the Co.Tidor area into classes
which e¢hlbit similar tranrnartation- related characteristics or wouta be affected slmilary
by development of Route 30. One approach would be to use 0o following simple catc;crics:
• Households
• Industry
• Landowner '
These categories could then be further suVIvided by location, and the consensus building
process would thus be able to draw upon specific knowled ;e of the relative level of transpor-
tation benefits and financial burdens that nccreo to various areas and Jurisdictions impacted
by corridor development.
It. addition to the complex analytical work, we will draw on our recent public opinion surrcvs
In Southern California to understand how the publlrut -large views the concept of benefit/
burden. Undoubtedly such knowledge will be helpful to political leaden In making dec:slons
on financial strategies. For etample, our surveys revealed that vote. -s' perceptions often
do not parallel reality (an important notion when voters are asked to ratify expenditures),
particularly In tegard to financial burden. Almost thre"uartem of the voting public
favor a one -half cent sales tax Increase over a fifteen- cm,t- p"allon gasoline tax Increase.
although the out -of- pocket financial burden is approximately equal for a two -car family in
the $35,000 Income range.
Is-
0
F' 0
® Task 51 5V ect Card +date Drgi :.nd Ftmncial .11ternitives
F�o'c: Develop a r,:c;mmcnda•:on
designs lly companion financing plans which cam bn detailed to Specific sevcral community !camera to candidate high:vey /froe•n•ay
candidate schemes, evaluate exrilc(t actions necessary far I;nleme ting each or�!hc
Activities: The primary activity in this task'JU Invoive the consensus bulldtn;
Process 011 ca on the array of design options developed In Task 1, the listing of flnsnciaq
oPtia s developed In Task 2, and the benefit/burde.n anal
wort with the corridor Jurisdictions n selecting those most promising dell
PI'm cm,didates for Im analysis conducted in Task 4, we :vd!
plomrntaUOn planning to Phase lt. Si' /financial
The most effective means of makir; this neclUon/recommendation is through a pro,,,,, of
evaluation "Men can be dismissed with individual Jurisdlcations In a sunpia and strat;r.:-
forward manner. Surh an evaluation shorld present results —as discussed
which Indicates ilia Official, ws and costs which are likely to accrue to the constituency of
various elected ohe b'c1a and /or c '�0 °min s Way
evaluated by means of several broed criterinj�ciston- makers. Design conecpis will be
• Pcrformar✓:e (capacity, level of- service, Secess(bil)ty, ate )
• Impact (social, ecoroniic, environmental)
• hnplementalton potential i
• Cost
O Financial sources, though somewhat more difficult to mvnluat�, will be com
according to rho follnwing criteria:
pared
• Revenue potential and dlvcrslt/
• Flexioility /timing or Implamentatlon
• Flexibility /applicability of funding source;
• Voter attitudes
• Political /legal feasibility
• Ease of administration
• Benefit /burden equity
• Economic development /growth
• Economic in pact /axi errailtles
• Fiscal Impact
Task S, SUM mnt.lzjnlntcr_ 9reSs ,rt for the project w1B be mmen ed at the conclusion or
oPtlore to be dasigneU ngdetail hl phase llcontalatng rccummenaations
on a "she -t ILt.. Oi
pobtl v o dhvelopr r-O nm .,datl ns,l Rather than the more typle leu� 'pith
Process, :ve
level with key represen•a tivr Corridor P grnm should be to :vark on a morn onePt o -nne
i of )urisdlc dons,
1i
TWAMOMCANiNSMAWI C COMPANT
4fa�irYlN _, Y.! �w�t
K.wY.Ir.�w.�YelL'IAYR (VNAfIY.it^w..a(i�Vx(W.Wy..wM
W WIFrs f..IV rY..Yrww.r.... MWC TrL Iw+.. LYYf( Wy4..wyw(w
irw YlwY y�rw41YVRYUMY.a(�.en �1WWY�wM.�e. �I VIyW1.Ylvne.wl .NwY(Y (Y
YI riV4C�nFY LYtwrlwrnlwnYrAlw�.^Kd1414wIw raMWY �F
wN.x�y IYw4(FYN^1wI.4wF rYlrryWOY.w1YYIlY W,j lrr ^HIYI wwlYww. ^�i..(rYrr
T+w rww1Y^wllrrrM4Y Yt0.YLIw1LW 11 r flY YTR I Mac" MIYYYfL COYIIMa.ww
Mw wwL
CAI. sJ IG4MxrIwAYWIII rlrlww .r'YyAOw�i�WMIr.4Y.LYr/�WwW W4AYw.w�
FIYI R. A,1✓•4YL i1. LWwY YY Wr(tlLAwww w. hWn6Y1 LM1rwArl r w YW wrw W.y F W CwYN
ftiYa M Cugr Y Y. yI N l�wwiY M Lrwlrl Y NI YY.Jprx4 w... M Yv r M1L ylwY 1Wn. Awwr Lglwn
i(AY^TYJr Yrrlrw W ^M1WaMYYM' Ir(yATaY(rsrYYllra.wW wrYyprNMWw
YYrMCwlww►
Lnw 14 A.JM! L4 Ar1wF Y YN fYn Aruw (YnYly. A]wrxr >y4 W A^r WL M Y (wY.y \ W YYUer
.sYrq YY.IwY.r.l W .Y Ir(.wrr�r W YYrMp /r.1 rWl Y.1 Y I..N.(Y YT IN. F r. LYi1 Y 0.nw.w N
rr PFrw..wN.nYr Y4�1.eYq(wW.l�
pITIC ..NIMII'fA�LCWIAMY�YraYMY4(�.Y WNw r.lWY1 NI.wY..IKWW14Ytr.WYYn
W rIYW.
CK[IOLKD Yr Y:(....r^ YA.�n..Jrr Aualr 1'mmnr.Hf.ww AvFJ •fm.sl NM C^wrr. yW vYYlw
fu�Ne:.rj.~.n�Iw i�l1(�j� w�f •.I�I.w�e1 �r.Y o��r kMMrl ri IrmMw YYH enuN
wNw YYM Yw b LwAwa b✓^ Y Ir....l Yu rY14
M YRIRSf rNGt M. ML NIL IICAY MLUTAK[LWfAYYWrr1 by ^v.wYY F1nYnJ4Wrw
Wrslw.wyY4(wn�NrrrY
26!h arM 'Htbslm to p
tll[ AYLISYI fr VIAYCL!Of11AM
nARacuaolaA. ��
fm AYe:otvnwwrl..AVrn
any f&[n I.rN fops b r N Lf 1.l ^wwn.rNnw 1LLelu.'f Yf 731Jv
�Yr -1...A.y AIFM(NrM..4MYwYWxY IWYwY...nnJ�r N TNIAYI[ .m pn1A \1.W r.
Yv YxV.YW WYM.YYI MNwMNWLwIY.1YN.YW NNWL'...wYw. wY l4 WYIMYN.WwI.rY
.T /Y.. W xA4MY(Ix Y..Ynr(F W wi.
fl'JILYYlYM[l[OI.Ik.(Nr.wwlwl YrlW YMwt.LwlW YlMwxx YiulrYrH.Nr..
usil L uAi �J��� 4� GUITAT
Y='X•Ll'Jp1Ir .
ft ti((Wx1 eY.Y WMi�il IY
(LLUYGR
Rllip C4IEfMN
Lm.rcLVnlwwrluorn
4pMY Y LnMV Yr rLn wIY TR AVtISAY MyLAM(f 4e,(YfY RII[r C^w WYt[RY(}a.
wW J(W lIN W lllrnY WW 10�[l C ATIrIMII rrxr Y w Inn N(W M In.TN11. w yry.ww. xY....y \Y4L>
GI^Y \W.YLwN.WYW W(YfwI�LMIMwMInxYWYI. ^4.wYFP
t
fwrdwlrr MtgyrrlrWln.IIaYIM 16tn MN� inmin 86
,�:3
i
1
Held 10. 311 1413
• Premium tmlWec!n times for
HAINTENANCE On,, Try
KNOW ALL NCH By THESE PRESENTS,
That The Hllllav Lyon Company, as Principal, and The
American Insurance Company, Incorporated under the laws of tLn
State of New Jrrsey, and authorized to execute bonds a Surety,
ere held and tlemly bound Into rho City of Eancho Cucamonga,
vuniolpal corporation, State of California, In the aus of
Stacy four tlbarand two huWrad sad no/lon
(8 6s.3ao.00 Lawful money of the United Stara of
America, for the pay -ant of whlCb sus, well end truly to to made
to sold City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of C211to•:n14, and Princl-
pal and Surety, bind themselves, that, admllUtratort. succasots
and epelans, jointly ark4 severally, firmly by than presantst ye-1%✓
The Condition of the obligation Is such, that vhereas,
on -or aaoat Hey 11, 1,82 , The Nlltlan Lyon company, pony, at
dsveloDer ant s[ad into an agreement for 'hrct 12"!
Rencho Cucamo Coll!oenla far the sum
Of t al,000. DO nga, , and barea, under the tams of the
agreement The wllllem Lyon Company Is required to give bond for
S u,100.0� o to laure the Ltry of Rancho C
ueamotpe
t +t the developer agrees to repair and mainaln old Improvaaants
in nood Bond ltlon and In accordance with city apolf:ea [lone tout
Ono year attar acceptance Of old Imprevamantae Row therefcra, if
said bevelepar 'hall for a period of one year from and after the
data of acceptance of Imprewmente by sold City of N.:ncAO Cucamongw
repair and toittetn old Improvement,, than the obligation to be
VOIJ, athecwlae to remain In full force and effect
PRINCIPAL[ Sul=,
Txt 4 IUM yew muA�y
James F. Ep ly. VI ant
•� ihe•1((t 11 aS Lyon f ny
THU AdCRICAR INSURANCE CCMPAlly
Vs4 treene [. AK sra - a -[set > ,.
,
• 1
11
'THE AMEAICANINSURANCECOMPANY
��. CRY IAew JTVSCr. ^e7Na THEAMGICAN Ito Cii td WuP f;; fmPwu..e Jvl ttpNn/,urawth own,w
Ne of IM SMIr w Nt. !rr« >. ,ad M•Ile m Pnrnwl oT[e b 1
h freJtua ae.Y,.wwnn W oppatA, ) e[eeee. CNJanue Ma and cftwwd e.d
•-- TATRILTA 811F8NL'R — +_
beaSay Wd alAbrerlftl:n fan. e•IM /ug fo.nWw, Awn ►i [[Ir /bA{wwr.fy[e W[vM.Mrvsx[. «J. « \w41E[W
ft4•nae)w Ni lwed,,aawnaUede , lnuy �rwtwatkt .nian Nlplwrb tk Wmre. ��al.wk
wlro Yn like �yi)at hR Ib kW Cwrw,a wdulnRoad b&Amy f,pC,WiaekOq. 91Men, tiwd ke6a Rne4w. aeaid wii lie tlre[an «uNt1K
Oa tad AnnriHerl►Fwl or)tbbtM Ftawa
fwu u" d eTm °nieY 41n^led N[wrun b N.inr VIII, $nl[w;C wl/ SI of !)yu.[ Of THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY mn as fA
'Aevdr YIICAnrbadf W MtlreRTAa{i[aa•ravrdJiq wdARmw)y.fonwAdnR drp)2oSa/1T•KewWN�Jr Aiww,,,,e,
Rahn )0.. tM CS�fs[s at an 4M of Dc«ue4 q[ PILShn, uY YbPmldd, w uP MA« Iowa euA«uN N t FIwN tat
and n, qk CJNmo of the Ramd et Dow""' w ur Vlm•pra"""' a), hoe uae d uwe, +Pre4t Rwnl ANUUaI Sennuae
oI^ � b �[►Irr.l W An f« W r ieA[U.0 ly CwP«,M W Alnn d [«[N Ywl Prone W w.te ePPUnrn f« W M
Saw. 71. A Tk Al derlq f am% RwMel Am""M rant -ft Aaw.nalA•a W Allies Wa k u pnnped b the iumwnt maim"lrl tW � I] tfweenl
W ey wOwul poetw LLnnr a) be ansted u u7 oat by de 14W of Dua of by
Y) P•p'a.1a w,petnw d allrsaCj sfpydlnt..
AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY sv ♦ �uf� eariail K fcli°.hlr � '°^ Mewn iI Oi Rwrd N O+tnme N THE
owrNt/ « nwaN/ t ) ,awd end by a tAY TdW Yp W Seµewber. IM. W Ma, Rtlele,nt Y, am bee.
– RESOLV r.0 1M„k,j M,m, N uy Vhn•Pmld,.t. AMIM[K Secretary. W Rnilra A„fidn Srm•a T"
CwTwuw. we, w amen w pnnle at un1 M.er N n,a to ea/ n.auK. w on h of tin CarPembn• W IA, «al al Aer
NdadIw.dmg wpok,RUCorWal"I • rtrwulot of rP Pow ofwnne). w n•n6cat LaMar�twh K[m4 It,,u 'a[fxn{wtt uaa Wq IM,e
IN MTFNI3S WHEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY W owd I6e« Ou n.aa w be aIyan, In iJ VaI,•hnuka.
WCemnanaddkkmlewal6tseam 26th d,,.1 If _� e/ Septasbar BI
.
/t�f
THE AMERICAN {N$UTANCE COMPANY
f
Ri
STATE Of CACDORNIA.
CRY AND COIJNTVCfSAN FVANCCICO }«'
Oe,ht._46th darof_ septReDer 83 Pichard MS111Rm
b 41 a.a.., .ht, &M hl me aun urom. Otl dtpou ,u! u/, th«!r h VK ►mnttm f�nAMERICI N INSURANCE CUHPA \t UK Cm:
PC[Jlwf dOblkd b a,k .aKA nnNe{ 1:) AhOT aa`1' -ml, IMI In Ib.t Ohl an of dd Cnn «,Iwe. ,MI IIK Inl al(nn n Iht Jd m.Alwent
1{nnenS�o.xrwl.Iha1R.nn nhlrok wen of tae idn wDmnwe a /dd Carp"'I nwd am, 4usw h. Newt Ihnno ►1 hit wan
M WJTN�S WH[ R °OF.Il.ve INn.mo wt et AoA1 W alR{Nw1 Pf6rY: aa1.Me 4)ad Jo« Am41 Erueb•rerinet
OFFICIAL 6EA�'L�r
wsll c c1uuT � x5+�..a• =., ,/" �G
12DA Cewatw fe,atlNw 1/ ,ev
[IITDTCATIC
RATYOfCALWWWA.
QCYANDCOL7JYYJFSANIP.ANCTS[G � e'
G ealeeclt*ro, WwMta,AWnealSn«ry
tJof THE AMERICAN INtURANCE COMPANY. AHEM'JEAtEY cam ;el.DOIIEftE§vCER-
Hry Hal C.t fwnoled an a,e«hn POMER Of ATTORNEY rename b (af (mn ar, bee IKK beta n•etro; N,a fanbem,that AnKlr Vill, St.,
titeaJSw JI of w f) 4.9 6(1 tcnp«e4oa, W W 14601.1,11. W tM fwd of DK«we,tel fw,hb lk Po.,, of Anwar!, an awl. to role.
sNSaudwtr4/otW Ci aaeC 26th -9
I wwpary, FnMKS.Dtldtk q,f 7anurry 86
v Rw.hr Aw..t Mwwl
'x rIn.TAar -.
e
t �
1
pond No. 3 3 {fn
Pfea lase 1.1wint In cLraa for
lwmm:xzS'di
MAINTCNANCL CONO
Flow ALL MLR By TMLSL PUSLNTSt
That The William Lyon Company, c• pCIOClpal, and The
Amotican Insur ... a Company, incorporated under the laws of the
State of Rata Jersey, and au 4arl{aQ tp ax¢ute bonds an Surety,
ate held and fl rely bound into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, s
municipal corporation, State of California, in the sue of
rl'ty thro thouu5d el• hundred Id
is 32,600.00 1 Lavtol money of the United States of
Amarl Cl, for tbo payment of whlch mum, wail and truly to be made
to sold City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and Princl.
Psi "&.Surety* bind themselves, their edmialstratora, aw.eossoaxy.-
and assigns, Jointly and sovsully, firmly by tnera pmsentsr
Th. Condition of the obl.gatloo Is such, that whereas,
an or wut n. y 11, lxr , The William Lyon Cavpany, as
developer entsted into an agreement for Tract 13046
Rancho Cucamonga, California for the sum
Of S 336.000.00 --, and whereas, todrr the terms of the
agreement The Wlll,am Lyon Company Is ,q,l,.d to give bond for
R 53.600.00 to l000re the City of Rancho Cucamonga
that Ito developer agree. to ups it and maintain said tmprovmaotm
In gtod condition and In - CCOMecty with city specifications for
one Yost after acceptance ef said lmprov.esnts. Now therefore, it
sold developer she,] for c period of one year from and after the
dote of accOPUnce of lmprovrmwnu by sold City of Rancho Cucamonga
ropol: fed maintain said Imptovemants, then No ob'lgatlen to be
v Id, othetvlso to rosin In full force aed affect.
PRINCIPAL,
M Mum Lim CtlOn.
Pan a
SURCTYTY,
TIIL rJ1NRtCAN 1 \SB RANCL CUmPARy
Patrle • antaer, uta[xy -In -ram[ - .•
µ f$
1 ��
THE A?*ral]CAN INSI)RA,t,10E COMPANY
WALL MCV aT Tl"SE" L" VTy Tln THEAMERICAN INSURANCE COWANY, a Cw�la /dI aptlwe..t etiuil, e.M IM
J a� WW ►N" JIM'- W Mriq NJ ►rr.*W ONE w yf Cat W Cw y a S. foam,. Ce, aw. b, wNf. awunwK W
Y thee, pefew, wake. uoeart W MaJ1M
--- rAMCIA Inane.--_
& err ate Ydd
Ib•n ti LOW a Whet. tt v1Y fN••Yw wan vrege W W M on, M h F, uw:. W.' W,W. YeY.w. rr. a.Ina.IKae aN
w INC aw,w /bnssf
rdwbide Ibe on thereby wftRYWto tle.ware lJi Ilf,wh bo.Cy vu..ir" by the Preside .said.ft11 IM e, MM,, Mr a HE
Cwlrultr W ) IneuK y as Smeary, bxy awe anAMEAI 14 W t W 114 Arr.etttaw. ut my b Y IM pfeua,
fair ttw cff a.-WS h sawW pawn Y Ank* Vlll. Seth 70 W 71 K tiro a TN! AU VRICAN INSURANCE COM►AA'Y tov w fa
'Auk V1D .ASIViNra.tyA.WrfpAYfivafoarryfs WAaerwT. h ,7��brnrgligdrywaty/,Me1.Ahrrwr,
Sseko 70. Aarohmwe. Tb CyOya of Oe tone of Daetm. the PmWmt. my Vk+Fmiewl w uY wan prtto urkwpK by I%, Ratd of
D �4Cbimtt of Oe #Wd o7 A.eten. W ►)rdoe u ay VW.PM Mr. arY. fnw I.e tt Ibe, t►pi.l Rtrdrt A.J,utl fineulxt
W A Iepltrtl W M Ir W M bW! w 4 Cir►tratltt W ASnL Y awep yr Veom, W rLLt
i.WI:ID.CvmMWwM. afpantefJfr ad la
o Soct,o f31. atuYtaML W bwLy of Yeh t'"m Amm"I Seteearin. A tteseYOla -ran, ode Afwa ekes be w ptr110ee c the bt,treeem
f @"W tYm a1 of ands, Vt- "n011eA7 W, be wMM w my I..e y W 0wra of Dkmm w y
A, pcYO r
T N
an 4wnM Y W e,ata o1►mY V nL"
r sumNi he tynee ud wake rdte W y re aaebltY a the felt- -i ft R..hman "ma y the Retre a dnnra a THE
AMI �l[An INSURANCE CUM ►ANY' ¢ a weuy er)i calk/ W bM b Or TaO 4Y a ielIrinw. Ifw. W Yd IMYhare &a M been
.IV nbe p ftpeke
"RESCLL7D Wlra.ifa.tnrattr YanfhJ%tntT,Okphtar re". u0R Wren Allinaml 'r
IsW`VCeaw. w.1 be aw,ee r wrests mn m111eree a sew), at an/ r.trr e[allon ores an teary a N, l Craronlien, owl rb rat: rha
foram adhm.eilof�oa the CrpfilosLrevecwwawuYfo, eraularnq•wrvRcitf�/euaeJaU f�wJe ttyi uleme wJ /ruwJr ual rj&Il le
IN %LTMESS MTIEREOF. THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY has "sed thew pM M, Y be ppae y b, V,te•ftndm.
r0&afr.aawu b bn.,,sHI .d Ya 26th f,YOr September D 83
—�
T�HEAAVE/RI�C�ANN INSURANCE COMPANY
STATEOr CAIJ/JRN1A.
CITY AND COUYTV Or SAN FRANCISCO at.
O"his 26th —carer_ BePUDbar if t3 Richard HSIlia=
Y Ye am. 1 I w, bfen wt PfnonJtl, nine
a, vase Ma{ 0 we rt ld t 0d etyma W YY•. tbi
RESOLUTION NO. - 64�
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS -
FOR TRACTS NOS. 11934, 12044, 12045, AND 12046 AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK
WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts Nos
11934, 12044, 12045, and 12046 have been completed to the satisfacticn of the
City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Coraolotion is required to be filed, certifying
the Fork complete.
NON. THERLFURE, be it resolved, that the work ': hereby accepted and
the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Compiaticn with
, the County Recorder of San Bernardino Caunty.
PASSED, APPROVED.'916 ADOPTED this 16th day of April, 1986. �CA'
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
S � rey King-. y-or
AT'EST:
every , u e e , „ y er
I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approvea, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at
a reg,ilar meeting of said City Council held on the 16th day of April, 1986.
Executed this 16th day of April, 1986 at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
ever y u e e, y er
r +v
I
DATE: April 16, 1986
CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA
K 'AFF REPORT
rial
nary
TO: City Council and City Manager
FRCM: Lloyd B. Hobbs, City Engineer
BY, Linda Beek, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Imprnvement Agreement and Improvement Security for
Tract 12801 located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian
submitted by The Deer Creek Company
Tract 12801 was approved by the Planning Commission on Ocuber 24, 1984, for
the division of 32.3 acres into 98 lots in the Low Residential Development
District located on the southeast corner of Banyan and Carnelian
The Developer, The Beer Creek Company, is submitting an agreement and security
to guarantee _he construction of the off -site improvements in the following
amounts
Faithful Performance Bond: $230,000
Labor and Material Band: $115,000
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary
school districts and Cucamonga County Mater District. C C.AR.s have also been
approved by the City Attorney.
RECOMMMArI0M
It is recommended that the City Council adopt tho a-Lached resolution
approving Tract 12801, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing
the Mryor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to
record.
*Ls7`..1 �tted,
Attachments
lk7lCEN '1S"Y MA IF
NOT TO SCALE _
Y
F•
TRACT
2001
CITY OF PROJECT Tom.-}- i7t3n,
RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:
ENGINEERING DIVISION - T EXHIBIT; A
'a
1
-
fl
CITT OF RANCHO CDCAMOBOA
C,
IMPROVEMENT AC0.f EM EKT
C
F00.
FOR
P
TRACT 12901
aNOV ALL MCA Bf THESE PRESENTS: that this agqreement la
rode and entered Into, in
Conformance with the pros laioae of flis
Subdivision Nap Act of the State
of Caltfo •wia. and of the
aClllubis 3rdlnancea of the cif
city
of Rift No Cucamonga,
Cal Vorrld, a nunlCipal corporation and besween said City,
hertiaafter referred
to as the City. and The tv
ere OV7, Atnt +e eel errs' —T as
f
WITRESSETHt
oral THAT. WHEREAS. laid Dotal ppv desires to develop Carlo In
propart)7 fe Satd City as ahcrn
on the Conditionally approved
sabdivl eion knov� as TA 12901
and
WHEREAS said City has established Certain requirements
to S. not by said Devolopar
at prarequli it0 to approval Of Said
subdivis On generally located on tM sapth side Ban
or n, between.
_Calfpn old eveyl AvoL l _- _
�T
NOW, THEALFOV It Is nerdby agreed by Said City and by
acid Developer as fall•ru
1. The Of eloper hereby agrees to Construct at
Developer's expanse all I.PrOVtmonts described an Page 6 here-
of within en lop mootAs from the effective date hereof
2 This agreement shall be gill pct ire on the data p/ the
resolution the COUn
cll of said City approving this
rfo2nt. h
agreement. This IS agreement shall be to dofault om tXe day follow.
is the first anniverstry data of said app rcvN anlaee an esten-
Nan it time Au been by
Panted sold Clty as heralnafter provid-
ed.
complete the tarns �Jertofr may requestn
shalln beosubeltted to
the City In Vrltlnq not less than 30 days before thasespiratlon
data hereof,
and shall Contain A statement of circumstances
The
right to rergavA�ApsOrpHSinna ofiothis agreeeent �hnaludiag the
Construction standards•
cost SCtimate. and lmprovesent seeority.
Site therein If
and to require she
any substantial change has
occurred during the term hereof,
tat
r
r
the provisionslfOf the Apretaent. the City hveO
shall thieyrtgiht
at any time to Cause $aid Provislocl to be act by any lawful
moans.
„
>
and thereupon recover from the Dalyloper and/or ale surety t.
the full Cost
and ¢cpense incurrtrd.
51 The DdvelOPar shall prtride watt red rater service to
each lot of Said deroloratnt in accordance
vred the raservicent, '
s cbedules, and fret or the Cucamonga County Water
`
a
71st -Ict.i
6 The Oarrlaptr shall be a•at;pnsible for replacement, i
relocation, or removal of
any Component of any irrigblfoa water - �,
system In conflict with construction of required improvements
the "+
h4
,ta •'r:
satisfaction ci the City Engineer and the Owner of SC :h Watt*
system.
l- '!
BIB- Utica Art.
'•
v, •�
AanUO Cucamnpa, G 91730
?krdb %- 5..- ;•,t..y �..:ic :f<<�;rn.. ' t.
'A, .Kv - 1`.r. .. .. s4 -e
1F:v 4 .t•,
n r• •.:I
:t
hE
v .f
t
y
y, Improve-ants requ brad to be constructed shall -
conform to the Standard Drawings
and Standard Deciflcetidns of
the City, and to the ImQrsra.fnt plan
.......I by and an file In
the office of the elty Enq)neer, Said Imyroremeats are tabulated
on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on
Page t rareof,
of taken Ire. Ila Improvement Pains listed thereon
fisted
by numbs". The Developer Shall also
be rrspons lble nfereon
tlon ar any transitions ur of fr Ineld entai work beyand'ths tract 01
Errors of at needed for safety and Draper surface or log
Error[ er pemissions tlIscovered
during eonstruetfn shall be
Corrected uppn'the direr tf°n 0Y the Clty Englneer,
Rrr bed work
due t° said Plan mvdlffcation: fhpll bI turn red by the provisions
o/ this
egreemant find fet,ntl by qhe furety covering tna original
P boned works.
B, Cihstructfon permits shall be "obtained by the
Developer from the office the
of City Engineer prior to start of
work; all regalatlnns lotted thereon -hall be pbserred. With
attention to
given safety Procedures, Co mini of dust, noise, or r
the
Utilities and City n!i t0 Falls; notification or public
wish section shall be subject to the Penalttss ororfdeduibarefer. tD is
s:V 9 The tveloPer shall he responsible for ranort3
al non
k
-S.3^1
rocks and ocher debris Ire w public rfghts_ ^f -wey within
0r •djolning said derelopaeet
y
refultln9 frcm week n)atln to
Bald develoo.ent.
v
Shalt
diligently Pursuedr pn completiosp °thus CCity shailCpire
the right
to complete any and all rote In he Avant of unJuct11ie0 dilly In
comQlatlan, LO
and rates er ail tOCt an° esp ensa lmnrred from the
Onslaper end /or his oatralt.r
by any lavful au CiS;
11. Said Developer shall vt all times f011cw1nC dedica•
tipn of the streets ano sate.. tits In
said subldfvlsfon, up to the
compietf°n and acceptance Of said work or fpproveseat by said
C ty Council,
give good and adequate warning to the traveling
Public Of each and
every dangerous condition ellf In Paid
tent ,
street or easement, end will protect the traveling
garb[
such defective or dangerous conditions. s from
Until the conc'stl °n of ail l.Proranants. herein Internet led on
6 to be
�.
oPiggy , Performed, ea :h of said streets not acu•rtkd as
i°aioo.r °:;y Shah
°orsa the charge
of said Developer. Said
be11
conditions contained In a toePoraryn street yclosure
the
�•
E whenever Permit. Issued
Pug during tnen coeitroctior. imProrLants to hevaio -
t° De
made, agreed
12. Parkway tree required to _• planted shall be i
Planted by the Developer [/tar
other Imaroveeert. work, grading
end cleanup has been Completed PLnt {n9
1
Shall ba done u ,. ry
approved by Ordinance In accordance with the planting -diagram
approved by the City Community
,zf
Development Director,
The Developer shall be responsible li for salnN lnlnq NI trees
1n STOP Ae tl th until thi and
maintenance of the yyuaraetasp lf.
bteranance perlaC, or for an* Year alter Dlantimg,
l
rAlchsrer Is
d 1 1
13, The DelN spar It rrspons ltla for mhting ail CcaCf• ;r
tf0ns established Dy the City
ft
purmaei t° the Subdta is ion
assn _
ee. ^"i: yi'Gi'."` ?: A.1,'1
�,Y'w. 1S•..� 1.i':1:76Tt`�'•
s
k"
1'.
�r
D
Y.
- r �N.•.�1k�t,,f•t1 r . -..
•
and no Improvement security provided herelnwlth shall De relDas ee `
be /ore such acceptance unless otAer -Ise provided and +utAOrlt Id
bl the.CltY Counctl of the City. •
1e This agrefm•_. that not terminate Intl I the
malnte.d by he Ci ee tecurl ty here,nafter detcrlbed has been
required im the Clty, or urttl a no, agreement sogvther With the
successor c lnproreven: s I rfty has been submitted to the City by a
Counciice < h the c f Deenn accepted, andy tAlsolagremont the
and CIAa
Imp ro Yase.t aecpr, ltf in* r efor has been rtilased
oevaloperlvlth thi•: improvement aeeent shall security lst of rho nlol tavl ^q and
sAali be 1e. a form acceptable by the City Attorney: the
A. To secure faithful performa.ca of this -agree.[. t.
1. A bond or bonds by one ar mora duly authorlted
corporate sureties In the form' and content`
2
specified by Government' Code Section 66499 1
An Improvement Security Instrument`:, the fora '
and content specified by the City Attorney,
y. A deposit with the City of money or negetla ►le
bands of the kind Improved for securing
B. To secure l libart'S band mattrlaleen:
1. A bond er bonds by one or more duly authorized
corporate surmttes In the form and ccntant
speci.lad by Government Code SectfoI 66499 2t
2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the fora
y Anddepositt With specified by moneyyp,t Attorney
beads of the kind approved for securing
C. cash deposit With the Cis) to gu+n•Ite. payment
'
by the 0areloper to the Ong Iota. or surreynr yment the settinyycertificate f all [boundary lot corner lisp for the Greet
tier notesm to the nifty Td Tie furnishing the
ndepoilb
m +Y be any e.ou^t certlfled b the enfireer or if no
n lueyt3 Submitted`s the Cash bond Sr;ii Abe ass shown
or the Construction and Band Estimate
herein. co,pined
Said cast, def,oclt may be refunded as coon 49 proce-
dure permits sfter receipt by the City of the
centerline tie notes snd Written asfur+nc4 0/
payment in full free the engineer o: surveyor.
0. The re4ulred bonds Ind the prinulpaq amounts ••i�.
thereof era Set fire; vn page 6 of this agreement.
15. The Iurials and this agreement shwarrants ll e fhsa from l defectsmn In
ItarLis and rorkma.shlp. Any and all po•t tons of the feDyyrore- �'
itsi ld Or them lcpmrovasentsw are acteptvd 11) year
the City iAal7tbq i'
'paired or repl4CO by Deralopor free of all ch s.... .
tl. The n ... I.... _ w
-• •� " 111011111 s abllgatloot as•dKCr l6edmle th lslthf
graph,
the f*MAlCan<e 9Yarante, aecYrttl' .all &Tta seeaii st Saint faithful Derlorcance by the OevalaDer cI any obligatlon•of t
0aleloper to do Spreltied work with .smut to any perkw
.y-
-twi�tN1. �`w� i. ,.: Ra .'�• ••f 1•F r.0 f
sr'
■
'etlenta or f200 00, vAl<Aarer Is yrenter, to secare the faithful
farforrance o1 Deraioper�s obllgatlonl as described In this Para -
""'j The er oroance nh gu,q ntee securl ty shall also secure the
Ialthful J the Oerelo ar
0arelooar to do specified work OP Or Any obligation of the
Accepted a itsassavot dl9trict• On ce rt hieI Oct eto an have Park*,
or
by th ed and a aalntenance guarsntae recur itY wt been acct' peed
DY the City, the other ImOruv ant sacurltY deseribed In this
au sl orfit0 l release Suadlr:sloe dNn t Ott such re 10416 Is otherwise
Ordinance D Act an any applicable It
Dubuc 114b111tYt ands roe tad shelf take out and maintain such
hfm and SAY contracto�rprertY subcontract Inswrenee as shall protect
DY this agreemtat frog C14143 for tsar Derfora ing work co'n'ed
arise because of the pr0oerer
this agraeoan t, rhethart such o the vo
!` rantractar ar subton tractor, or ttu
amplM)d by laid Per tort, wren though
by tAt negli0, co of the Oerelup,
11dO1I 13 ttA subcontractor or anyone "ANYed by
ado 1 gy and Draper tY d,,q,go Insuran
insured and direct lY Dratec
andn his ndtubcoatri,ilrsa, rand aallhtf
hereunder shall so staff Tnd Hntrue
ih all be as follows,
Iv
- -a "'--air or by Any
directly or Indirectly
'Ch damages be at Caused
or any contractor or
Id Persons The Pubafe_
,M 11 list the CitY'ai
the city, Its officers,
'eloper, his contractors
]rand Policies Issued
a aunts of such Insurance
A. Inlur7e orr'deathabliabilityarl jolts n% rnotn les8dehi
2]00,000 for tech person and $1,000 OCO for :the
Ityt limits or occurrence snot rlet$'thse grope 10000 J86490 hiacci-
dent or occurrence wibh an ag9r0gar each of
1210,000 for claim, which may arlta Roq eM oDtra-
tloat of the pereloDar In the Pfrrorga¢co a/ the
work herein provided
e Automobile liability Iatertnc. covering all
prorldingrb bodily the llabi 11tY11f..its 90 %amuot
ICs, than 1200,000 Ier each Parton and $100,000 for
1 hb1I1tY dllmltsr of not'iess� than f60 OttiP damage
act ldent or occurrence, with an a each
I than 5100,000 rhleh aY arena 9froi the 0 not
terns in the Ceraloper or his Contractoca In
serf pnlag the 'ark prorlded for heral n:
IS. That before the etacatlen or this agreement, the
Oe re loge' shall file with the City A certificate or cm tlrfuht
cartlnlcw�eC9 covering tea ,Pacified Insurance Each
• ,hall bear
unc6llatIOAS, or reduction le coverages of man precluding such
after I Such tAe aCityi cIna(l bha nereceived l not t flcatl thirty evidences
all •ram the Insuranse cArrte Y (001 days
Y registered
Of Intent to cpoVVdl rsrith isaoShe the .rsions contained herein, and
follaweng deserf ed Imprdrement ucwrit elder Ms tubmltted end
Signature hereto: Y, And has afff,ed his
a
■
'etlenta or f200 00, vAl<Aarer Is yrenter, to secare the faithful
farforrance o1 Deraioper�s obllgatlonl as described In this Para -
""'j The er oroance nh gu,q ntee securl ty shall also secure the
Ialthful J the Oerelo ar
0arelooar to do specified work OP Or Any obligation of the
Accepted a itsassavot dl9trict• On ce rt hieI Oct eto an have Park*,
or
by th ed and a aalntenance guarsntae recur itY wt been acct' peed
DY the City, the other ImOruv ant sacurltY deseribed In this
au sl orfit0 l release Suadlr:sloe dNn t Ott such re 10416 Is otherwise
Ordinance D Act an any applicable It
Dubuc 114b111tYt ands roe tad shelf take out and maintain such
hfm and SAY contracto�rprertY subcontract Inswrenee as shall protect
DY this agreemtat frog C14143 for tsar Derfora ing work co'n'ed
arise because of the pr0oerer
this agraeoan t, rhethart such o the vo
!` rantractar ar subton tractor, or ttu
amplM)d by laid Per tort, wren though
by tAt negli0, co of the Oerelup,
11dO1I 13 ttA subcontractor or anyone "ANYed by
ado 1 gy and Draper tY d,,q,go Insuran
insured and direct lY Dratec
andn his ndtubcoatri,ilrsa, rand aallhtf
hereunder shall so staff Tnd Hntrue
ih all be as follows,
Iv
- -a "'--air or by Any
directly or Indirectly
'Ch damages be at Caused
or any contractor or
Id Persons The Pubafe_
,M 11 list the CitY'ai
the city, Its officers,
'eloper, his contractors
]rand Policies Issued
a aunts of such Insurance
A. Inlur7e orr'deathabliabilityarl jolts n% rnotn les8dehi
2]00,000 for tech person and $1,000 OCO for :the
Ityt limits or occurrence snot rlet$'thse grope 10000 J86490 hiacci-
dent or occurrence wibh an ag9r0gar each of
1210,000 for claim, which may arlta Roq eM oDtra-
tloat of the pereloDar In the Pfrrorga¢co a/ the
work herein provided
e Automobile liability Iatertnc. covering all
prorldingrb bodily the llabi 11tY11f..its 90 %amuot
ICs, than 1200,000 Ier each Parton and $100,000 for
1 hb1I1tY dllmltsr of not'iess� than f60 OttiP damage
act ldent or occurrence, with an a each
I than 5100,000 rhleh aY arena 9froi the 0 not
terns in the Ceraloper or his Contractoca In
serf pnlag the 'ark prorlded for heral n:
IS. That before the etacatlen or this agreement, the
Oe re loge' shall file with the City A certificate or cm tlrfuht
cartlnlcw�eC9 covering tea ,Pacified Insurance Each
• ,hall bear
unc6llatIOAS, or reduction le coverages of man precluding such
after I Such tAe aCityi cIna(l bha nereceived l not t flcatl thirty evidences
all •ram the Insuranse cArrte Y (001 days
Y registered
Of Intent to cpoVVdl rsrith isaoShe the .rsions contained herein, and
follaweng deserf ed Imprdrement ucwrit elder Ms tubmltted end
Signature hereto: Y, And has afff,ed his
a
I
r
NI
e
I
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
TYptt PrInCIPal Amount 130,000
lane And address If surety:
MATERIAL AND LABOR PV11ENT
Type: Principal .amount: 115,000
Mine And address OF suret•
CASH DEPOSIT MOOUMENTATION
Typst PrIOCIPAI Amount: 1,No
ASIA And address of surety:
NAINTCNARCE GUARANTEE
Type: Pr nelpal Amount:
"Ace And Address Of suretyt
Tp
TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE By THE UTI
IM WETNESS HERECF. the parties hereto heed caused these
presents to 0e duly tracured and Aatna.ledged with ail
formalities required by lee on the date[ set forth opposite their
s 1gnaturee 7NC DCGR CnCR COMPANY, A General Partnernhlp
Data by
— �TynLFury •Dereloner
By' CRICSOY DYVEWPNNNy, INC
A Gane�al PAernrr
Oatt I /01/e0 by
DcvOfCptr
ynature
Jon N. Griothy
rnt
LIAR YGe /•yey
Cp cr BAN RNRNAROIRO I el t
aeb'. IIa1
e wma In•n. ,mww,M +oR a LcdR7 tA- _4.e.be.mn..v..e.tlb.rrrw,w.aa.
P.em hwenb,lMpw,rb wnraewb.
— ATGF= A..aa.v r+`wrw..ebe.rbaba„nr�M
Pm ee/weerlbw lA.wymw ®we.Y. i i Tcl' tcsaT V4v446yriii eIww.� orAtrv—Axwwomsw a
_
eiwrN�MaB i r g1jigg w,
-COMPANY rAr
_
J \1 MIr.,0bl w••bbl renlRPl MIyvMN0I<
11'jE war. m.•rlw.'acaa.e.a l aNxL AKips
prw.wv�.o
la3g t. AtlGFO L9_ t .,=,. owwl
eOde
4Ir
1
,o
�'Z
LING IoLLN I.:
..
EL'CNOACI91EIlr PEM11 TCE SCIMI LE
'ur IryrprOrCIH;
TPACT 00. 12801
-
Glip At cr w¢00
Clt Onwln
NOTE: Dues nut Include current fee
for
'
.. ;t!••3 r.relt or payment de posltt
OUANTI /T M T
ITCH
"
611
L
- •Ei
ANeUNT
G
nnAg L.F
B.C.: curb . 12. C.F U. go, .er
P.C.0 curb
2
7.25
L.F.
. 0- C.F. 24• ,.ter
P.C.C. curb only 8• C.P.
bxC
1a��
-(.;mod �•i
B• -12• Nrb Ten tle.lOn
5.50
6.30
;�
--;96-
10 S r
4• P.C.C. tldewalk
Uri,* approach
1
• -+ea C.,
0• P.C.C. treat TRler (Inc curb 1
5lract
rS
2..0
3.40
C.T
tic...itno
Irported emanteent
a0
_IIS.,lyT S.F.
Preparation or subgrada
l.so
S.F
Crushed Mp. base Loer Inch thick,
w15
0.03
T�r
•+=- uu1s95'
T011
C.
.0 1300 tons)
A.C. 900 to 1300 tons)
2 "00
N.3p7 YA
TON
TON
�Ortr
A.C. 500 10 900 tans)
A.C. under S00 tans)
3S.00
4S.40
S.F.
A.C. 31 thick)
60.00
S.F
6`c
Patch A.C. Itrenchl
1• thick A. ory lay
Y.
0.59
1,75
797MU -M
�-
-•� ^ ^•
EA,
Adjust aivtr eaMOle grade
Adjust
2" Op
__x_
�II0
5 EA,
�FICSTEA.
fewer cI, . aui to grade
Ad Just ralar aal•as to grade
150.00
75.00
L.F
Streit fights
Oarr icades 0,w,ec 5500 nln)
10.0
L.F
2 r 1• re Id herder
1.W
I.)5
-�-
-G22. I F
Amoral A.C. Darman tTCP.1Sa5pfstre•6.5UO.00
-4 L,F
or
neanral Of P. C.[. curb •Gutta lr
stre•ti Of A.C. ben
1.30
-7,.757-00 6
EA.
Street
FA.
Tralll0 Olga
0si
200.01
-��UT D
•F
Contrail block ..It
7S.W
S.F
Aatalnlnq w. I
25.00
TON
Aggregate base
20.,0
C.T
Concrete structures
�-
__� L.F
10• ACP
2400 0
a'00
- •'�'
L.r
2d• RCP
1500 O
29.00
-'
^_ LG
361 RCP
20M 0
35.00
- �-
��, L.F
f0• RCP
1200 0
19.00
- ---_ EA.
Catch basin
N 4'
76.00
-� EA.
Catch ball. 0 . 0'
2000.0
EA.
Catch bat P. N . 22'
2900.00
EA.
EA.
Local depre on a'
1500.70
$00.03
EA.
Local deprnslon 12'
Aunetim etructw
1000.00
-� FA
FA.
Outlet strecaure, Sltl f506
"1
S'60
1500.00
- -�
--
EA.
Outlet structure, 1507
Guard
500.00
'
Li
pastf
Wild panel (aood)
'I
EA.
EA.
street Treae
21S...1
LE
uead.all (10• wl.g)
50.00
1000.60
7.993 S.F
Nenpve LNletln., Aa4lcadO
'•
L.B
EMdscapiny L Irrlgatlon_ CAAAELIAN
250
^:50+?(0't3
=S3a O.P.
.all curb (a•
UanOleap Aatep
2 75
27,50
SO
-
r75 �yQ Air
!Mai OEEal N2 INSPECTION FEE
'PEStOAATIN
9,819 SDO
/DELINEATION
CApI Tor.%
1'600
100.700.76 ' ri
OEPOSST IREFUNOASLE)
CONTINGENCY COSTS
FAITIVUL PENF„IUMCE
•4NWEN7ATION S.n11TY (CASN) p O�
60hD (1WS) 2S0-7UT-00^ :;'•'
00R
- LA AND ItATEAIAL
OONO (W%)
1T3','Ol)Q;gQ
'Mrsuart to Clq of :IMCho NcucnON IWAICIPSI Code, Title 1, p�:ptar
hl nerd lop County Ceda Tltlts Chip
1.00,
avN
• ude Drlor l0_lisutnce
ters I -5 a Cash restorat le:ddallmdlas
of an Englincrr Ly
adopting Sam
deposit
•-„
la pad 3/91
CMStm,tlon PtM t.
ahNl7:''
.e. ,.
+'
We, ',owever, also in, uired of several cities to see how Athey' would answer
the same question. 0
City of San Bernardino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50,000 p.a. �/-
City of Fontana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $52,000 p.m. s/-
City of Rialto . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,000 p.a. s/-
City of Chino . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . $40,000 p.a.
Average . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $45.500 p.m. a/-
Again, the cities are re-- eonably g,ouped and consistent, but show a $30,000
difference in tln average cost per acre from the Landscape Architects group.
Hby the big difference?
The only major difference we could deteruine through discussion with the
Interviewees was 'how they accomplished tie design and canmtruction'.
The Architec, groupe viewed the question from the perspective of, -How much
would it cost t•, get the product delivered through strictly public bidding by
the 'private for profit' sector on the Job, from deeian through construction'.
The Cities, on the other hand, appeared to design priearily 'in -hmsa' and use
City labor forees to grade and construct whenever possible. The Cit., of
Pontana, for esmple, ranted gradere from the City of Ran Bernardino on their
last park, and hau City of Fontana's heavy equipment oneraton do the work.
They also used the California Conservation Corps tc d, Vie convtruction labor
with t:,eaa City employees acting as leadmen or sit . periatender is full time. OD
Linder our present system, ve do not have recaur.:os to do full 'in- house'
design or con %truction of major projects. gith that in mind, I believe we
have little alternative but to align more olosely with the Architect's
perception of cost per acre than our municipal counterparts with their varied
amounts of 'in- house' capabilities.
Ilovever, to institute a -D- factor of $75000C is politically untenable. An
increase from $40,000 to $75,000, will be viewed an a method of circumvention
of the intent of recently adopte.l state law. This would not be the case.
Itwever, there is no way the B.I.A. or the general public would ever believe
that.
Staff Recommendation,
t. Adopt he -P- factor as stated in the Resolution, and
2 Adopt a -0- factor of $60,000 per acre as a mid -point of park
development cost per acre as reflected by a summary of the
public /private sectors engaged in park design and construction.
If I can provide further information, please advise.
13H/ow
q r)
n,
RESOLUTION NO. 8347 +
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF RA3C80
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACHE
TO LEVELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has adopted Chapter '6.32 of the ltunicipul Code, relating to
regulations fo: dedication jf land, puyment of fees, or both, for park and
recreational land Ln aabdivicions ai.d planned no ®unities; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Cade estnolishes A formula
rocuiri:,g as a component, "(the) average cost per acre to Jevelup park land as
determined by the public agency ";
THEREFORE, RE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. That Lle City Council shall determine and set by Resolution the
average cost per acre to develop park land in Rancho Cuoamongn;
and
2. Tat the City Council aholl review and adjust by Resolu tlon,
whrn warranted, the cost to develop park land in Rancho
Cucamonga; and
3. The average cost per acre to develop park land in Ra:.iho
Cucamonga is hereby established at Sixty Thousand Dollars
(LS0,000), and it Is that figure of Sixty Thousand Dollars
($60,000) pt: acre that will apply in the application of Chapter
16.32 of the Municipal Code.
4 The averagn cost per acrd to dpvnlep cork ind an determined by
thac Resolution shell at,.ly to tentative maps or parcel mmps,
approved or conditionally approved, on or after January 1,
1983. The average cost per acre co develop park land for
tentative maps or parcel maps approved prior to January 1, 1983
shall be as set forth In Resolution No. 80 -46.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of January. 1983.
AYES e
NOES:
ABSENT: e
A. rEST:
Jon 0. Mikels, Payer
RESOLUTION NO. 83- Jv
. A RESOLUTION O1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAYONnA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POPULATION PER
DNL.LINC UN'T FOR THE PURPOSE OF IHFLl:MCNTING CHAPTER +
16.32 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DEDICATION
OF PAR.0 AND REC!1EATIC11 LAND.
WHEREAS, the City Coun:il rf the City of Raacho Cucamonga,
California, has adopted Chapt 10.32 of the Municipal Colo, relating to
regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and
recrear+onal 'and In subdivisions and planned communities, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code establishes a formula
retuirinS as a component, •(the) population par dwelling unit on a scale and
density Got by the responsible public agency', and
WHEREAS, Stott law, effective January 1, 1983, requires that
population components employed in park dedication formu'as, such as that
contained within Chapter 16.32 of the Municipal Code, be reflnctiva o•: the
"average size of each clans of household" by the coat recant Po6iral or State
census which discloses such information,
THEREf ORE, BE IT NOW RESOLVED by the City Council of the c2 ty of
&%echo Cucamonga, Celifwrnic an follows,
1 That the City Council shall determine and set by resolution
f� t1•e average population t,r each class of household based upon
the most recent Federal or Store census disclosing such
information, and
2. That the City Council shall tevlew and adjust, by Resolution,
if warranted, the populatior for each class of household as
revisal Federal or State census information Is issued; and
3. That the avarege population for each class of household unit
in Rancho Cucamonga, per the State Department of Finance
Special Census of April of 1979, Is established as follows,
A. Single lamily Detached population per unit is 3.43
persona;
B. Duplex residential structure population for each unit
containet therein is established at 2.43 persons,
C Triples residential structure population for each unit
contained therein is established at 2.29 poravner
D. Fourplex residential structure populaticn for meet, unit
containod therein is established at 1.75;
E. Multi- family residential structures containing S to 9
residential enita per structure, has established a
population f,r each unit contained therein of 1.52
permcnsr
1
P. Multi - family reaidentinl structures containing 10 or
more residential unite par structure has ectabli shed a
population for each unit contained therein of 1.53
persons.
This Resolution shall be applicable to calculating the dedication of land,'
payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land as raqufrad by
Chapter 16.37 of the Municipal Code, for tentative maps or parcel maps `
approved on or after Janus y 1, 1983. Tentative saga or parcel maps approved
prior to �r on December 31, 1987, will comply with existing law then in place
At the time rap approval was granted.
PASSE], APPROVED land ADOP^_1D this 5 day of January, 1983.
J
AYES,
NOES,
ABSENT:
ATTEL T,
Lauren Wasserman, City Clerk
4
Jon D. Mikels, Mayor
l J
,
.fit- f.��,5
)
COKMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM- REVISED BUDGET (1/4/83)
5) Local Costs - Program
Implementation
*(ab ) Administration 6,255 1.7
(( Prigram Maragement 51,358 14.3
c F-iir Housing Services 2,975 .8
(Inland Mediation Board)
'contract with West End Mediation Board
July 1, 1982 - November 30, 1982 S 875 00
contract with Inland Mediation Board
December 1, 1982 - June 30, 1983 2100.00
.00
Pregrain
Amount
_
1)
North Town Streets
$120,000
33 3
Phase III
2)
Neighborhood Center
81,000
22.5
Expansion
3)
Housing Rehabilitation
87,000
24.2
4)
Contingency
11,412
3 2
5) Local Costs - Program
Implementation
*(ab ) Administration 6,255 1.7
(( Prigram Maragement 51,358 14.3
c F-iir Housing Services 2,975 .8
(Inland Mediation Board)
'contract with West End Mediation Board
July 1, 1982 - November 30, 1982 S 875 00
contract with Inland Mediation Board
December 1, 1982 - June 30, 1983 2100.00
.00
Ra "1ij�y'��'{4yKCw
qq
( ca::
'ia• �
a - ay�yiC,
i
•a I!,
ro - �IL.4�P.
�..PaJ •! •,9
1' i(1.1�� kl,r .fl• LrMU .: l: ".. [r.... rat
a' f+ r •' in7, 1�}j
1AYdnda Rodlder `frank it therm MJght "0 Na Irouda aaaaada of a PWvwd l.SVII lion of Oa[A Llna fic ea
' • r
v) lhi Hlv a IS•C �+ .:
n. � t 1 1. •.i. -•s:.
a.a r -5%t�r lr �� t - YIA•..n
CreIf
eping tubanization
sparks Edwarida battle
IrY- WIY..rlr I.ir' A.duM.nagau.lar laea
•aTfA1 ®�Cfia
11
a1. II[m1ea V.tY aNaa0e tY dmWl OPf.taw W.rY Nb
rir•I.e.KIIII, i
W
aTtSt. r•+ ooluL for... 11010.000 no.
Oen u0rlrle0 grk.tuml aoma •4..
CrtWA.1DA — ltb ea I . Im.d am a tp Pe10..1 a W
W Lem m.alO b W e0rt.P.1 tl1Nra adr11Lr0 mmmmr bat
IommtpRr q W f.11le.d avr TTy I. aLa Wt [t1a..0a
M.r. eu mrl.ardtao W W .evld b a am0a 0I BPbpv
I l rare Of NOe0e Canmr. a JLff ty br0NllDCYlt 1Yr1—
b0.a m1. IN atone w a thI .31 mYW [-ryLr
A4tlr.neKr O.ltr lrt.ratl CalagaaY'ngalle.P dnr4
i
Nae b CIKLt
Mb..vp PtttIt Wfbt. W.d.uLlwa
IfaP IWCaL.rvaW.l N•
wWWaP mdadp• W�NiWftM'ubrt40imwelN
weal 12,1 aivc.LLVS,
Po0vleloe..tkn aar
St.�Be0reeardl�V�t1%. .I.Tieaar
bbpCop..a1�lm Y.egK.d b dnar W.PpPtwvrq IS ab[aup It
0l
I.I® u.t�mend.b0n.161.kI Ras
tryb.l d.ae0OOnq Wa Ia. C.L.meet. Ck..r Olt.
W YK1]0.0. W W Arr.a Ltd la. P.toLd
ned.
nad. Y fNW
tN01Y0.O b W lla►Ydo.e b .,Qa. oEiba ram a
tL peas a rag0111hK.q,pW vlmlW
IDlelfatl® Aed m W I!a M tan0 Y 00tlL
mA.ela lafr�rl W poP
Tti 0m aftn W �.pPt1 0i..0mL RP.Ia W aar rm
tvI. bums.OPat dn*b Tarnmml.rloekaeidl.i
W Lf.YK11WY.rL.1(b.. a1WP. tit
Yar.td..WaW YIIIPY NY el.[.d.d... Uth r.tthrt
P. Lad It n.
kOr [YkteKlla Pmrn rrtN b fmarW a t! W by
Nlllrytrv.d k RO[pe R.enl fP
aLr.YY VL aled.m.
Tb mLt KUb JPa pNnd� dKLbNlct
JAM
f1611 .fP.ra K!ry
damve[. r Po0...d rtl..ed. .rat �.lr
a1.mfle 1T.e. .alm Y nPrtw1 Tha id Llaer> remmltnr
Arnq w Ia."Ma nom r .,4. +JYn 1 nl ••!
prt Ae01M nlvr 0nm wryer ch tree W tDelae..� PWL=
LLs a Mme; ML lam.
b .K d.ad.d vaad.r01 iq ry, ar.cl.d dfaL -y Y
®uw Ned hL.b. aLrLnr.d f0
u txN KNP Wt Y .ad GPtOda LLw to
am g
WrLtlK^+LLb NltmwLW Kctm bed'b.ra a.r••.•.••t� Pai
DL+WP Lth'WaY meL Puma emalur t.
um 4 t
t>.rpvrlLd
.d�Cla �taty0Pim6lb PmdnP er.mW llm Bli[r..
Rr.t+.YOem W.trkmra
c ...
YaL <mMf111M, YI dblr. da na.eLaO CpLlm0.A9—.a.
w..0 aaL.rd. b. gpliklm.4
T1,, Nat US a.0
.mar a I. bram.l.m Rua d.sm0 aKLa
a t a
dMn1WKO m eIWlmedmput.leaVL ae.'. t ar.tr.e.u.m b . KaW
PAD3Y10mA
b s e - ci.,m. Y .27. nam .«
lam
aftutllma a.N •telmala .a •.
W
P.C..eprrm,p WnnM,b 0ea
dbbflr v
r amo
tameEaa Ldamaea. Y
Rabw;
sire.rmo C.17.v flat" P
"� ... W ebr.aemLL'wrad
O..M.da N L.a6.GY qv -Yat e.aY .bp Paef Ilia
.� ..
Y mr ramr tbr, 6 W n )u_Owlr.KlDh.ed ;Nl
mKefd M a W PLa a mt
y�
1
=aatln ef.mmelt .b Wr mL dnaoPy WY papet� Al ma
.adalaa.mb...mlalyW aLL'..tl rm .rtau tPicr m
m0..dmImch.t WaN
WKLa aptAAc.
r
v.OKtom fPm.KW eurlyd Yenrl. uPOet r a W
YA mrMWtrnf
;t'*
O. Wa0.e oL.r.I.e0eoa rtfW N�P,,dun�Pl�PWe
Wb m.74.bv1I N�
T .b .P.r It..pfa(le 1W To ra • C. KPbd W
.b trD 11"tI from 1101 dnK .ro Ym,l ml.aab.aR'W
rPt. t1Kb PPo Tap -Wr
W «mmtelp rtOtte. Yt,w
frn b.rna Wepl•pmaP
Y Il.lm NI6 tiv d..e0u u. m IW
aYna.fD.et. a W PoDe.tO P.e atddl. a a W yr L.. Y.IP
a ampp NW.Oa Ot 1N ittC
tar ay tr4 lyLyP 190.eM
l�
dimlkimasT Ym +Nee .NPP .1 n•
L
Trao.0ernaW W Nat .
b WmlOmr ur efp aM.4 m.11 N'll k....rmleledrf
.b Llmgblu Nb
etas W rlefr .aCE..a W
mp O,h a ta.l vad Tip U.W
d..ed. R.eLM NLa0.L.l OLYf Wb
r ItmaK lem.rONb ry,W raven gl.ae0a lb.a
ataalr. W qre maK, W 0oM
aI[ml.Wb InLL
I"WI
. PIa Wt b re.aL[Y10 raa'a
m.t.la m: babM1 fan W. Opab. S.p aflurmm VLL
qym w Wm PI mmbv
aSltr
YK br tommmn. Y fKaed
VL Pamra.la.Y.
a deLyq�d
Wta.baPta.lrKal4lta> uYa LP�La �Yna
y
d1.. III mp0 D alms W moat Ref.p
nYa W..aWOLip(Kt a1l.fld r0.lae. tad lar
IPirt dKfatOppl 1>
INdly. 1Mlmal efs
6=
i
Lrll
♦.•�\
IP 6. Iar .W la W I.A '.Y
r. Y
Will
I
� t
r'
t`�• 1
I
ry1gI WYd
1�1 ,YIibWW
�w
' i1. •.v�eiW
M wY1WYM W�MNx1 '[artYW{Wt/rWr••jl�WY1M..W rrYN
!M.• YY !YY . Y�frl, .\r YYIwY YNYL tYM Y M YIY..ar W Pr]YY
x trr NYY WYIY\!MM iN1YWrY.•wWl iY Wr yNrra Yr YrYY'Y
Y il1YW W NYMIW W PYLL w .Wr Y IN 11aasYWl YlIrY1°tlrM
�: Ifllsb \rlrnYlY Y• MIrW YY \Y..IM IYItl. YM
YYYI pYa' W w1VY. Ytr YY.YN Ili
rtlYl� .rYbY � bvWMY.l1Y\.w WY \IYe w�w..L
YN lr1YN Frs4A \rYYN•r IVr YNr
r+n lst.LYw MM1W WPV.1 /Y.w WLiY � \yywlq WVW RYI
tlf W W rYYV1N,tYb [YeY, MW.WS.YfI MYYW U W YL YIOY W IrNM'N(
LY.rY.rW !W\ W 1>m
r \\axt IN YWY pY w
W
Y YPWYy.LLYY4KYl P1 YW4LINY.Y V•YY1lC .'�.n.•1 n. /-.•�
Ym_.nr Y+wINYW r'MWWONenwlWrl IYaVWNy1Ji.W
M 41 .YIM WIYYWIrYYO.OLIY.QI n11Y Y'11Y \IYfY KCr.
•! �•TlrVlai %wbMll[IW .1 ...�.I a.l f. +r• W WYbwC ®YYY
Y \Y. w LC.WI Or W.MJYM M•'YI.Mw
!J-17
t'u'L
YIYYW IN.1YV Y Y W y�� 1 �j1.Y! .J W MM1r NI bYrtfY YNM
,r �nlw YNxlW brW I.xYy Iu MYnl1 L YNWpInu YalY: ir.\Y
wNYLw1Y YYYL .� NYN4 Y11 \..MY41w LINIY YIL T \Y.YYIII.
Y O.IYNYI UY put wJq.YYIYSIM WnY Wwp WYrIM1 F+4 YYf
Wnv1 —L VN NxYw aNIW YNbLY.INau : W.1rNNWrPW<
Y IYIY wneMw.w.a +.1rY. IiYrnulYl• rvY`w YINY r \Y�.Ir
YI 6TIMYNYLY.YYYW }N IWII.w\Y \Ylrr Y,IwsY
YIY Y.YI .nY1saYI CuYY1 YnIW1.Y Nn Mr rIY._ \ NYUL � w aww
M rYY pIO r.LHr \IO.pI! 9i. sd Y Y!1 tlw Y I{'r , 1 Yd .+x11 W Y �
1. L4rr /IY)IxYY YI WNW YY I/MYYYM.•
K bINY •IM Yq put a\x\IN LRra\Imr1 Yr YW.IY r11\yuLGaY
Y YYnW .IYYfi.YY Yr4 YN It'IW Yr . CNW wIM Yl.Ir1Wl1}Y
YaM T1lmm\NwIW brb ullbwYYn. tl.N/WW nWr
Y OIY wIWMwfYIYU naIF -1 Y11rYW MxY YW �. v.rr rY
[yNYyrlbaYIYYYYIIb rN`N4 .. �/
� YNYa WWwMSlv.1.n_ YxY.Y.IrW1YYw.
N TYI.b1 V \YUM. Yl�nnl �Vll�Yli�\�:U Y.W lw w/INW CW
m Ye\ Y
TY mxW. sYW .Y �uYY W YVrW Y.b\ rlr�{Yll..w YbhnW.
• Y G [qY YW1YW
eaNC�Nr1.rr YYfY NI�N rOy MnYMyC IxuY YWx� • .r.rr1
NaY W lY.wvN �NI pv IwY W KYl Y '
� 4aVWwbIW MY\ Ln rGpINWLax NY' ylLlu.I1. Yr Yrtls.Y
.� nl..cl •iW uet .x111 r w u. w Ir...\ rnla• r Ya"my.11.°Y°tal°MY\I�Y..Nw tr.
v nnnlalWYlYbu.Y un y1YW wlaYxW Wns
nW Lr1AWY.W.NYM Amb YSnN.Iltle pVN1lYlpot
A lv Wf.N114•utl 4i yw sYY�:eY .111tW
d \uYe YW.rY.rl W lartr. Mi
W M wYn .W Y is rr 1u/, M 91 IWI x r r 11111\111 w aNMI..Y
Y �Ytw:r.verlr°i1� lYU.n� .LVy,N;Pr � Wa..rrY. <�un
a� r
tf��
sY
�'•V.!' ..
•�f: w•"Y��Y�II M
s f!S
Ib>r.61Ah
• t: qy:i [tiwpe(do
rwr
Ipnact
N'YxYWl AY. .IVYY.+Y
:.J.p�
�►eyt�.�w
O
a
+N.
µ1I
•.i4
i.. D 1
iwr,�
�,'
. V
1
,
if' y. ' �Lf..�•
l� MNIfM
}li,•l,. lid.
•
MISpno
t{J r r
yb�
� '[•� }•',
, y•±f,�
7
:in
I�I,VyFfi'J
I «x11111 {I.a.
Vi •.:.i�l;/.y ':j..l
Jf �i�
6
"fl� [LAYI a
4!y4�1� �,f"Wo1
r-.: •{
ry1gI WYd
1�1 ,YIibWW
�w
' i1. •.v�eiW
M wY1WYM W�MNx1 '[artYW{Wt/rWr••jl�WY1M..W rrYN
!M.• YY !YY . Y�frl, .\r YYIwY YNYL tYM Y M YIY..ar W Pr]YY
x trr NYY WYIY\!MM iN1YWrY.•wWl iY Wr yNrra Yr YrYY'Y
Y il1YW W NYMIW W PYLL w .Wr Y IN 11aasYWl YlIrY1°tlrM
�: Ifllsb \rlrnYlY Y• MIrW YY \Y..IM IYItl. YM
YYYI pYa' W w1VY. Ytr YY.YN Ili
rtlYl� .rYbY � bvWMY.l1Y\.w WY \IYe w�w..L
YN lr1YN Frs4A \rYYN•r IVr YNr
r+n lst.LYw MM1W WPV.1 /Y.w WLiY � \yywlq WVW RYI
tlf W W rYYV1N,tYb [YeY, MW.WS.YfI MYYW U W YL YIOY W IrNM'N(
LY.rY.rW !W\ W 1>m
r \\axt IN YWY pY w
W
Y YPWYy.LLYY4KYl P1 YW4LINY.Y V•YY1lC .'�.n.•1 n. /-.•�
Ym_.nr Y+wINYW r'MWWONenwlWrl IYaVWNy1Ji.W
M 41 .YIM WIYYWIrYYO.OLIY.QI n11Y Y'11Y \IYfY KCr.
•! �•TlrVlai %wbMll[IW .1 ...�.I a.l f. +r• W WYbwC ®YYY
Y \Y. w LC.WI Or W.MJYM M•'YI.Mw
!J-17
t'u'L
YIYYW IN.1YV Y Y W y�� 1 �j1.Y! .J W MM1r NI bYrtfY YNM
,r �nlw YNxlW brW I.xYy Iu MYnl1 L YNWpInu YalY: ir.\Y
wNYLw1Y YYYL .� NYN4 Y11 \..MY41w LINIY YIL T \Y.YYIII.
Y O.IYNYI UY put wJq.YYIYSIM WnY Wwp WYrIM1 F+4 YYf
Wnv1 —L VN NxYw aNIW YNbLY.INau : W.1rNNWrPW<
Y IYIY wneMw.w.a +.1rY. IiYrnulYl• rvY`w YINY r \Y�.Ir
YI 6TIMYNYLY.YYYW }N IWII.w\Y \Ylrr Y,IwsY
YIY Y.YI .nY1saYI CuYY1 YnIW1.Y Nn Mr rIY._ \ NYUL � w aww
M rYY pIO r.LHr \IO.pI! 9i. sd Y Y!1 tlw Y I{'r , 1 Yd .+x11 W Y �
1. L4rr /IY)IxYY YI WNW YY I/MYYYM.•
K bINY •IM Yq put a\x\IN LRra\Imr1 Yr YW.IY r11\yuLGaY
Y YYnW .IYYfi.YY Yr4 YN It'IW Yr . CNW wIM Yl.Ir1Wl1}Y
YaM T1lmm\NwIW brb ullbwYYn. tl.N/WW nWr
Y OIY wIWMwfYIYU naIF -1 Y11rYW MxY YW �. v.rr rY
[yNYyrlbaYIYYYYIIb rN`N4 .. �/
� YNYa WWwMSlv.1.n_ YxY.Y.IrW1YYw.
N TYI.b1 V \YUM. Yl�nnl �Vll�Yli�\�:U Y.W lw w/INW CW
m Ye\ Y
TY mxW. sYW .Y �uYY W YVrW Y.b\ rlr�{Yll..w YbhnW.
• Y G [qY YW1YW
eaNC�Nr1.rr YYfY NI�N rOy MnYMyC IxuY YWx� • .r.rr1
NaY W lY.wvN �NI pv IwY W KYl Y '
� 4aVWwbIW MY\ Ln rGpINWLax NY' ylLlu.I1. Yr Yrtls.Y
.� nl..cl •iW uet .x111 r w u. w Ir...\ rnla• r Ya"my.11.°Y°tal°MY\I�Y..Nw tr.
v nnnlalWYlYbu.Y un y1YW wlaYxW Wns
nW Lr1AWY.W.NYM Amb YSnN.Iltle pVN1lYlpot
A lv Wf.N114•utl 4i yw sYY�:eY .111tW
d \uYe YW.rY.rl W lartr. Mi
W M wYn .W Y is rr 1u/, M 91 IWI x r r 11111\111 w aNMI..Y
Y �Ytw:r.verlr°i1� lYU.n� .LVy,N;Pr � Wa..rrY. <�un
a� r
tf��
January 5, 1903
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAINCA
CITY COUNCIL HINUr23
Rezrilar HeetinR
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
!n the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road on Wednesday, January
5. 1983. The meeting was called to ordor by Mayor Jon D. Mikels at 7:05 p.m.
Prestnt were: City Council Members: Richard H. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet II,
Phillip D. Schlooser, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. HL'•ela.
Also present were City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorny, Robert
Dougherty; Co.•auniry Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Rick Gomez,
City Engiuesr, Lloyd Hobbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community
Services Direot.r, Bill Polley.
Mayor Mikela amnounasd that SANBAO approved a SB 128 claim for sidewalks along
Base Line.
Mayor Mikols announced that Faye Dastrup was appointed the San Bernardino
County ropresentative on the South Coast Air Quality Hanagemont Board.
Mayor Mikels announced that Sharon Romero had been appointed the Chairman of
the Citizens Advisory Commisston.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Staff requested that Resolution No. 83 -6 be removed under item "k".
Mayor Mikels requested that item "1" Va deferred to the January 19th meeting.
Mr. Dahl asked for olarlficatl a of item "m ". Council spent considerable time
discussing the importance of the cairns.
Mr. Holley explained the process and why t1:o Historical Commission considered
the cairns significant.
Mr. Frost read the last tsntence of the staff report which :!ated, "In the
future, should anyone wish to develop that area, it would be their
responsibility to retain a professional to distmntle the eairna to dlseorn
their historical significance or lack thereof. Ilk, stated chat the Resolution
does not reflect this intent. Hr. Holley stated that this was discussed by
the Historical Commission although not put in the resolution.
Council concurred that Mr. Holley should contact University of Berkeley to see
what their intend was and to encourage them to investigate into this.
a. Approval of Warrants, legl3ter No. 83 -1 -5, in the amount of 0268,109.63.
b. ADprovr,l of Warrants for Assessment District 82 -1, dated September 1982,
in the amount of $863.579.01.
o. Approval of Warrants for Assessment District 82 -1 dated %toper 1982 in
the amount of $7,051,085.03.
• City Counail Minutea
Janus" 5, 1983
Page 2
d. Approval of Warrants for Assessment District 82 -1 dated November 1982 In
the amount of ;152,045.30.
(1) a. Alcoholic Bevarage Application for Larry D. and Area Chapman, Larry's
Playhouse, 8890 eighth Street for on -sale beer and wine public premises
application. (AS 83 -01)
(2) f. It is recommended that $265,702.95 from tha Systems Fund be usod to secure
the upfront coats of the Vineyard Avenue streot improvement project, a
Federal Aid Urban Projoat. The funds will be replaced upon PAU
reimbursement to the City.
(3) g. Tract 9434: Approval of Agreement and Faithful Performance Bond to
(4) replace Certificate of Deposit submitted by Haven Land and Development Co.
Release Certlrieate of Deposit $5,000
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -1
A BESOLUTIOh OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT AND FAITHFUL
PERFORMANCE BOND SUBMITTED BY HAVEN LAND AND DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY.
(5) h. Parcel Hip 5792: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement - Lewis
Properties, Inn., lc.ated west of Archibald Avenus, north of Base Line
Road
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION
AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL HAP 5792.
(6) 1. Approval of North Town Phase III Pre)eot: It Is recommended that the City
Council accept the new improvements into the City Maintenance System,
authorize final payment of $28,283.64 to tho City's contractor, American
Construction, (an additional $4,311.21 t be held in retention until
release of the Labor and Matrolal bonds, authorize the city clerk to
release the faithful performanae bond, ana authorize the filing of a
Notice of Completion. (Contract Noe 175 A CO 83 -001)
Release Faithful Performance Bond $78,986.05
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEENTS
FOR NORTH TOWN PHtSE III AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE.
(7) J. Director Review 81 -24: Accepting public improvements, authorizing release
of Faithful Performance Bond, and authorizing filing of Notice of
Completion - Takai of Amorican, Inc.
Release Faithful Performance Bond $9,400.00
RESOLUTION N0. 83 -4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW 81 -24 (TOEAI OF AMERICA, INC.) AND
AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE
WORK.
City Council Minutes
January 5, 1983
Page 3
k. Approval of a Resolution L) set a public hearing date of February 16, 1983 (8)
for the consideration of forming Underground Utility District No 1 along
Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street.
RESOLUTION y0. 83 -5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFETY OR
WELFARE REQUIRES THE FORMATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY
DISTRICT N0. 1 ALONG ARCHIBALD AVEUUE rROM FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD TO CHURCH STREET
RESOLUTION NO 83 -35 (removed)
1. Approval of nnowitant unb•aot with Den Owen and Asseetabea a Assauatnb (9)
Engineer and grown and Nsnrek as Bond Oewneai for the Alta Leas Chmnaol
Assucsonb ptstrAetT felo0eaeab ;k0tvieb Oa -a. (Item removed).to 1 -19 -83
m. Approval of a Resolution declaring LtSwanda Cairns as an historical (10)
landmark. The Historic Preservation Ccamission has recommended that the
Et3wanda Cairns be designated a City Historic Landmark. (See L,ginning note)
RESOLUTION NO. 03 -7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE RTIWANDA CAIRNS AS
A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, AND THEREFORE, DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY
HISTORIC LANDHARK.
n. Approval of Carnelian Street Improvement Project Contract Change Ordor No. (11)
3 (CCO 43), and approval of appropriation of an additional $20,600
expenditure since the amount exceeds the current 10% contirraney of
$14,471.28 to cover the change order. (Contract No 172)
o. Set January 19, 1983 for public hearing for Appeal of Planning Commission (12)
decision for Tentative, Tract 12242 - Hughes. Appeal or Planning
Commission decision requiring a Focused Environmental Impact Report for a
residential tract subdivision of 18 lots on 4.96 acres of land in the R -1-
8,500 (single family residential) zone to be located on the east aide of
Sapphire Street, south of Highland Avenue - APN 231- 212 -16.
P. let January 19, 1983 for public hearing for Environmental Assessment and (13)
Planned Development 8245iTentative Tract 12305 - Roy. A cnangs of zone
from R -3 (multiple family residential) to R -3 /PD (rniltiple family
reaidential /planned development) for the development of 59 condominium
units ou 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, east of Hollma•,
Avenue - APN 201- 232 -34 and 54.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar
with the exception of Stem "1" and Resolution Nc, 83 -6 in Stem "k". Notlan
carried unanicoualy 5 -0.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
4A. E4VIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -0 BIDCAL. A change of zone (14)
from B -1 (single family residential) to R -3 (multiple family residential) for
2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of
Monte Vista Street - APN 202 - 131 -61 and 62. Staff report by Rick Gomez, City
Planner.
City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 167.
.::.Y =tm, _ __ I
city Council Minutes
January 5, 1983
Page 4
ORDINANCE NO. 187 %second nading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZUNINO ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER
202 - 131 -61 AND 62, LOCATED ON THE NEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD
AVENUE, NORTH OF MONTE VISTA STREET FROM R -1 TO R -3•
Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to waive further reading of
Ordinance Bo. 187. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
M,MOr Hikels opened the abating For public hearing There being no renponae,
the public hearing wcs closed.
Motion: Moved by Sohlosser, seconded by Buquac to approved Ordinance No. 187
and to approved a Negstive D!Iarstion. Notion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser, Frost, MSkela. NOES: None. ABSENT:
None.
S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
5A. REVISED CONTRACT FOR INLAND MEDIATION BOARD. Staff report by RScY Marks,
Associate Planner.
(15) Mr. Harks stated that the City of Ontario did not want to enter into an
agreement witn the Inland Mediation Board. Therefore, they have entered into
agreement with the County and City of San Bernardino. Under this contact we
will be paying $300 per month as opposed to the old contract we were paying
$175 per month.
Mayor Mlkela opened the meeting for public input. Thorn bring none, the
public portion of the meeting was closed.
(16) Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Schlosser to terminate the existing
contract with the West End Mediation Board and to enter into contract with the
Inland Mediation Board along with the County and City of San Bernardino;
authorizt $875 to be allocated from the Community Nvelopment Block Grant fund
to pay for the contractual fee difference for the remaining seven months; to
approved Resolution No. 83 -8; and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -8.
(Contract No C083 -002)
RESOLUTION NO. 83-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAIJNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE CODUTY OF SAN BERNARDINU.
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND THE INLAND MEDIATION
BOARD, A NON- PROFIT ORGANIZATION, FOR PURPOSES OF
ESTABLIS'JING A CONTRACTURAL ARRANGEMENT PROVIDING FOR A
FAIR HOUSING PROGRAM TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
5B. ROUTE 30 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT. Staff report by
Lloyd Hubbs. (Contract No CO 83 -003)
(17) Staff recommended approval of an agreement with the San Bernardino Associated
Governments to contribute $20,000 toward the preparation of the Route 30
Implementation Plan.
After a lengthy discussion by Council, Mayor Mlkela opened the meeting for
public input. Addressing Council was:
*Doug Hone asked Council why they didn't consider doing an EIS. Mr.
Hubbs stated that an EIS would coat between $750,000 to $1 million.
City Council Minutes
January 5, 1983
Page 5
Motion: Moved by Schlossr, secouded by Mlkels to authorize the Mayor to sign
the agreements for the Implementation Plan and to allocate $20,000 from the
System Development fund for the Rancho Cucamonga share. Motion carried
unanimously 5 -0.
Mayor Mikels called a rdcoau at 8:40 P.M. The resting reconvened at 9:00 p.c.
with all moubara of Council and staff present.
5C. APPROVM!. OF RESCLUTIONS ESTABLISHING PARKS FORK.tA Staff report by gill
Holley.
Mayor MIk813 opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council were:
*Doug Hone, stated that the building co=munity has been talking about (18)
these formulaen, but they have not seen the "D" and "P" figurer. He
stated that no one "a against parka, but they would like to be ab.e
to sit down and look at the total feu package and come up with
something that will work in today's market. He recommended that this
needed to be studied and felt these face should nut be set until this
was done.
*Bob Nataal, C/L Builders and representing the SIA,
*Ralph Lewis stated that landscape architect's first propoaels are
always high. He expressed that the costs were too high since other
fees have not gone up that muoh.
Mr. Schlosser 3u9ge3te•1 the figure should be set at $60,000.
Mr. Buquet stated he was impraaed with waat wee stated with respect to
volunteer aervlces 1n Jutting in parks, but they did not materialize an! get
us parka. He woull be interested in seeking developers assist in Lhe parka
problems.
Mr. Dahl expressed he would be interested in Laking the BIA up with their
offer and saa whether the BIA was really interested in Rancho Cucamonga and
its prcblt regarding parka. I.a felt that the "D" factor should be set as an
average figure for County of San Bernardino at $50,000 and at the same time
encourage the developing community to work with the City for a better solution
on the "D" factor.
Mr. Schlosser stated that woruing "equivalent value of construction" should be
Inserted.
Motion: Moved by Dahl to rnoommend adoption with the flgure changed to
$50,000 per acre or equivalent value of construction with the encouragement to
the building u:mmunity that they work rltt, the City for a further adjustment
of the figure.
Mr. Dougherty stated this opens us up to ambiguity and recommended against the
insertion in this partluular resolution.
Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Schlosser to approved Resolution No. 83 -9
to have the figure changed to $48,000 per acre, and to waive the full
reading. City Clark Wasserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -9.
RESOLUTION NO. 83 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AVERAGE COST PER ACRE
TO DE9ELOP PARK LAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
City Council Minutes
January 5, 1983
Page 6
Mr. Buquet felt a lot of wo ^:t had gone into this to establish this figure and
although he could sympathize with the developers, he felt we should not c
arbitrarily.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Dahl, Buquet, Schlosser,
Mikels. LACES: Frust. ABSENT: None.
City Clerk Wesserman read the title of Pcsolution No. 83 -10.
(19) - ,,soLurIO\ No. 83 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUC,CANOA, CFLIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING WPULATION 8YR
DWELLING UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPLEMENTING CHAPTcR
16.32 Or THe MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DF.UICATION OF
PARE AND RECREATION LAND.
Mayor Mlkela opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was:
#Doug Hone stated the developers were serious and they would
appreciate the city council establishing a Council Committee of about
two mwbera in order to examine the entire procedure from flood
control to fees. They are ready to roll up their cleaves and go to
work.
#Carl Stark atLted he would liko to get together to discuss thr cost
of landscaping. He had his license, and felt he .ould be of nelp to
the city council.
There being no further input from the public, the publia portion of the
meeting was closed.
Muticn: Moved by Buquet, esoonded by ?rest to adopt Resolution flo. 83 -10 and
to valve the entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0.
6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS There were none.
7. COUNCIL BUSINESS
ADDED ITEMS:
(2L) a. Mayor Hlkels stated the City of Fontana had ap,,rorched him and requested
that the City Council express opposition to legalized gambling In Fontana.
After some dlaouaolon, Council concurred in waiting until more infonsation
could be obtained.
(21) b. May.1r Hikals prosanted a Resolution from the City of Upland in respect to
treatment with the Housing and Community Development Department in
Sacramento. Counoil :eferrod the Stem to staff to draft a Resolution tailored
to our own experleuceo. „
(22) c. Councilman Dahl state: that Council should postpone dss�usslans on foes
until we know what I=Dut pending State legislation may have on city
rovenues. He was also suggested that c:aff conaidor adjustmcuto in the
beautification fees to eliminate Square footage of garages as a factor in
caloulating the fees. Council concurred in handling both Stems at the same
time after Hr. Schlosser returns.
(22) d. Mr. Dahl also stated he would like to dlaouso the drainage fees after Mr.
Schlosser returns. It was originally scheduled for the January 19th
meeting Council concur ^od in setting this for the February 3rd meeting.
Q!
City Council Minutes
January 5, 1783
Page 7
,
8. ADJOURRIeRT.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Schlosser to adjourn. Nation carried
unanimously 5 -0. The meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.c.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clork