Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1983/01/19 - Agenda Packet
0 E E] G •t'i HOB. °Y� MY OF RANaKo MCANIMUL LL °' _ nCITY MUNCIL of (6 z AGENM 1977 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base tu:r Rots Rancho Cucamonga, CAlifornia Janunry 14, 1983 - 7330 p.m. All items submitted for the City Council Agenda onmt be in writing. The deadline for sibmitting thssu items is 5 :00 p.m. on the Wedneaday prior to the mead ^.J. The City Clerk'a Office receives all aunt• Stalls. 1. CALL To ORDER A. Pledge or Allegiance to Flog. B. Roll Call: Dahl_, 8kquet�! Frost_ 90:I'Oeaer , and Mlkelo C. Approval of, g, 1983 cr 1, 1982, December 15, 1982 , and January 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Tnursday. January 20, 7 :00 p.m., PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Lions Park Community Center. b Thursday, January 27, 7:00 p.m., ADVISORY COMMISSION, Lions Park Community Cantor. o. Thursday, February 10, 6:00 p.m., JOINT CITY COUNCIL /PLANNING COMMISSION MEETIUO, Magic Lamp. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR The followLig Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and meta - controversial. They will be ace A upon by the Comoil at one time without discussion. a. Approval or Warrants, Register No. 83 -1 -19, in the amount or $364,282,67 a City Council Agana -2- January 19, 1983 b. Approval of Warrants for Assessment District 82 -1 for 3 the month of December, 1982 in the mount of $653,794.67. o. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Eugene C. 6 A VSrgtnia De YOUnd, La Pasta Hill, 9241 Foothill Blvd, for on -sale beer A wine eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mario H. 6 Yara A. Castelan, eto., Pollo Don Luis, 9170 -A Foothill Blvd., for on -sale beer 6 wine eating place. e. Approval of consultant contract with Don Owen and Associates as Assessment Engineer and Drown and Nazarok as Bond Cnunsel for the Alta Loan Channel .assessment District, Aeseasment District F2 -2. f. Forward claim against the City by John I. Dowser to 20 the Carl Warren Company for handling. g. Forward claim against the City by Edward J. oud 21 Eleanor Croft to the city attorney for handling. h. Approval to destroy certain City records. NESOLUTZON NO. 63 -11 23 A RESOLUTION 02 THE CITI COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE 110 LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER G07ERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090. i. Approval of Parcel Hap 7689 and real property 29 improveeent contract and lien agreement by Stephens: located at the northwest corner of Summit and East Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -12 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL NAP 7689 AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT. J. Release of Bond: Site Approval 79-01, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Avenue. Owner: Community Baptist Church. Labor 6 Material (road) $25,500 .r _3- January 19. 1993 City Counufl Agenda k. Request authorization to seek bids too uonstruotion of a traffic signal at Dase Line Road and vineyard Avenue. Construction documents are completed for advertising this project which will be coordinated with reconatruotion of the access to Alta Loma High School parking lots. Estimated cost of the traffic signal work is $55,000. 1. Historic Preservation Commission reacamendation or Historic Landmark Designation for Christmas Housfe. The Historic Pre3rrvatlon Commission held a public an Landmark Desigcati n� for 3 the Christmas House ouse e(HrD. Cousins House). RESOLUTION No. 83 -13 A RESOLtR•ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE CHRISTMAS HOUSE (H.D. COUSINS NOOSE) AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREVORE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORIC LANDMARK. 1 1 36 37 m. Approval of Assastment DSetrlo([�1t 82 -1 Contract Change — ,�y�,- �- .� -� _ Order No Fa c. Unocostn work (POCOs toebe drown from ff the project's street con tSngenLLL++yyy fund. 4, PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Tfl7TATIVE 4RACT 12242 - HUGHES. Appeal of Planning Commission dacislon requiring a Fooune. Environmental Impact 18 lots Ron c4 96 acreu residential ofiland i e in the ft 1 8,51 00(single side l of Sapphire r elStreet, eoutb of located Highland east A enue APH 201 - 212 -16. Staff rsport by Rick Gomez, city planner. Recommendation: The Planning Commission rep mmonds the requirement of a Focused Environmental Impact Report for this project. B. etfmvi N1tPlTAL ASSESS!ffiMr AND PLANNED DEM.OPMW 82-05 tENTlTIPP TRACT 1 :'SOS - HOY. A chantte of zone from R 3 ( multipie family rostdentia1) to R -3/PD (multiple family residential /planned developmnt) tor' the dovoloDment 59 condominium units cn 5.•24 acres of lend located north of 19th Street, east oC fbllman Avenue - APN 201 - 232 -34, 54. Sta :f :e"Ort by Rtek Gome-, city planner. 40 74- L) i C 1`" a�,i4' L) City Council Agenda -4- January tq, 1983 w P.eco=endation: Planning CO=ission recomends l appro+al of the change in zone.,/ -4" wcu. c' tY ORDINANCE N0. 188 (first reading) 117 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201-232 - 34, ALI SREET EAST AVENUEO FROM R -39 TO RT3/ D, 5. STAFF REPO'?S REQUEST TO CONSIDER A GENERAL PLAN Id11D USB CRA71G8 A71D 118 - -- A. Zu11IN0 CIWIGB OPOP AR INDUSTRIAL PARR LAND Dsg. Staff report by RICK Gnmoz, City Planner. Surrounding residents have requested the City's from Industrial consideration of a land use ohanao 6th Street between Park to Resident.al, south of Hellman and Archibald Avenues (Subarea 16). Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Commissicn Council refer this request to the Planning S for consideration. 8 CONSIDERATION OF INSTnLLATIOH OF MICROCOMPUTER FOR THE 120 FINANCE DEPARTMENT. Staff' report by Harry EmDeY, Finance Director, APPLICATION OF HONT'G 108 BOND ISSUE AMOUNT BEFORE THE 124 C. MORTGAGE BOND ALIACATIOtI COMNIT7E8. Staff report by Jack Lam, Community DoW—Pmont Director. The City oust reapply with the Califer-Sa State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee ae of the new year Mortgage Boad request. in order to be considered for a 126 RESOLUTION NO. 83 -14 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHOPIZING APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF A MORTGAGE SUBSIDf BOND CON?IRMINO FILING OF NOTICE OF SALE WITH THE MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION COK11TTEE AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING 'THEPETO. 6 CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS 7, COUNCIL BUSINESS 8. ADJOURHMEHT r- ooS( 9 dteaWr 1, 19p2 1 CITY Of 1JCCIt1 CWAMMi CITT COCOCIL KINOW ,real.( I4et1n[ 1. Call " 0 WA 6 roe lar malie0 of it City Ctuooll of too City or both, 0,ettp:p uaa old to ib Lima Tory fiasmltr Center, 9161 Dane Lt.. told, 01 Vodboerr. deoabar 1, 1912. T1u atetlb[ Y a1LM to order at 7839 Pb. by MTar Job D blbele. hsamt wnl [.,00hs,, O'chud M, dhl. Clwlta J. ltquot II. FOSIIip D. i loau r r. Jar. C. hat, aM M7a Job 0. blbla. Alas preaebt eR., Cllr Mfytr, L,W V. ,triers(,; City Jtto I T, b,`rrt Doieonrl CDbs+bltf po"laprbt Dlreear, ":% Lai city O101bev, L3.7d wbtb f. 0iraeter, Strrr, L"I aM Cosubitr Anleco Dlnotar, 0111 Jp9retal of IDOUteee Mtim1 "b W by dal, roamtod by 0dllouer N e99rore tb a tbo or 0e2totar 19. dtarr 6, DotoDrr 2r W 0ovt 3, 1.909. my' 141"le atatM torn oar ao orrsr 4 tb ximtob or Oetcber n, pap {I ib roeur rh>Id anoot fm 9:2' p.o. L 9844 p.s. Moan m",,W utb4ioMbly to ap -. all tb .looter as bbe O . e2. ateppa PTM a. M. a W.' eIt, ooClbeer, preronted M wontee of tb .tors QtcaJO. b. drld Onalte aaletoot asa[.r or tbt wtd Club, Ieain :M tb city a for tht 1901 rodrtrlap Yhy Irstros. e. M7or olbela cannead tot tot CbLarlo llrpert GgeE Ics.r Comlttr obt m 0or4mer ISM. -brr, .`t boa Le 7br It of W airport eapabtm ewer, W rs loetlb0 at 4talia of (labelµ,. 0. lb Drator 19u, tb c— 21 rill to cocrN m aenlnlb W rep( -amt 3u dnmNlm Cc®y m ib ht,ne Ceut alr Ouiltr Maiteuot bird. •• tleerr4F. deems( 9tb, wit a ae ni-oio 4"i ^le nu eatim. f. fa Uboa De .t re9urItee Lbt Itoo TD d atr e G tot Atooda µMar C.11 A L000t. C.Idoratloe or too Macao .f Yee Cbrlctat bwr. 3. C6Of}f GuJ At a. /rvo�rl of Y+ U. tgirtw b, 02 -IS -1 fa ate n t of b. iltt4otlo beenbe ie9llr.t lob for Ja T. boy .t Loo b!LLav, Deaa'r. 01d S drrrdls. ieao, for Db4alb Coerral hblle M1erla" Lletaa. e. Ala lib Deenr6e /ppilcotleb for Oarlr bare C.rd,no, Rroo•t Rsv M.4s Satuuvt, 9671 Foothill Dtm, for d-38I' 0.er i VI. ratlin 71aoa uc..nat F- �: d. Alcobolle 0.nnae Application ref J.Y.J. Country 7r.aafest a 13vern. 9134-9136 foothill Died., for W -Sal. Mer A Vice Utica fill, 4cana.. •. tawest ome year saterwlon of, Igrorsnt aar.sa.nt f.r traot 113;0 subdIttad by Looney Dnelwmt. Loosed at ten. northwst coiner of Data Line toad and Nenome A,..,. ALWEITTICS 00. 82.2m A aL=XION OF In CITE ODUICIL OC Tft CITY OF RADC1D C11CLC1CA. CALIFOttIA. AFrrotISO DUROVt10Z7 Erm"ION AOtaDiCIT AND 11010YUM SCCUAITT MA FUCT 11350. C. Approval of Subordination lyssnt frdo W. V. Connvlll. For a 11041. fastlly naidme lw.ttd at sat fast Avenue. AESOLUTIOt NO. 02401 A atmix om Of TNa C171 COWCtL Cf INS CITY OF RANCIC COCUOICA. CLL FOUTA. AFFROVIW A 910019 79ATION AO11000Yf 1101 rO. V. DOV mess ADD AOTIORIZIRO I0t CITY CLOR to 3101 In SAM. g, haunt by Coes.UtY 3.nfp.s Wpartnent far Aarlsad Le1a1 of Clerical Support. A request to urfrade a thrasy tar, Dart -ttr Clark typist pasltloc NStbla the CeawLLt• 30nlcu Wpartst.At to • full -ter obrk typist due to ieersased Departmental Wes voluas. Iundlna W e0me frost Gemenl Aaaeneq to became efreatln Jan aey 1. 1903. 0. Smet public bearing data of Woaanar 131 1942 for OMrmwntal Assessment end Iona Ccons. 62 -03 - Nobel, A CMnae of can from 3.1 (.Lila fully esldeatlal) to D -3 (Mlttpls rosily r.aldontlal) for 2.02 acres of Ions located w Me vast side of Archibald Avenue, north of Ilonte Vista 3trest -. M 202- 131-61 A 62. 1. Approval of Conflict of Interest Coda for Officers and bploy". of the oednelopea.t YsY or the City of aanan, o_.= _ten•.. The ft-development loamy w February 17. 1962 rpprored . conflict of interest cods. It to now rewlrn Met Me City Council approve the action ease. by cps aedvelWMnt Agency, gr,5=109 No. 62202 A 1Gi01.OTION W M CITT COUNCIL OF INt CITY Of RANCHO CUCYtOWA. CALIFORNIA, mrTIVO A CWP.SLT or IIO VT Wog ION Orrlcm CIO wrtOlm Or M 1dv FIfEIT WORT Of M CITT Of PAVCIRD COCAN0ICA PURSUANT TO M MITICAL Acrom = Of 1971. wtlont Moved by SNIoeser, wounded by DOI to approve tM Consent Colecder. Notion carriW 9 4. A, PUBLIC MAINUS AA. COe40M2X rle A NODILa NOIS ADNuA31LIU710M ORDIRAKE. Staff report by jl> Awtns. Wyor Mick eased if tae subcommittee pad anything to report Non. Duauat 0 sas[.d that the, had MMLU further to report. It n• Pill, .m to Me ceunnll and Me daraatlon Me/ wished to a. Mayo Male op.,W Me setting for publla hearty on Me .raft o.dmard.. Addroas Mg Cadman wave, OUn gWda. ehalran of the FAMho Cuessenga comers .atalttae, Stated Mat May are vary happy with the status and wordLM Jr Up. proposed ordlnales slbvard dLnderland, owner of ChappaMl Peights, stated Met sthea an 9I8 la • legal Mculraant, be wild )Lk. to s.e "to done Cato,. a1 ordlanc. la prepared -ft. DNgI 6611 tondo,. Deb., apveaaW amcem with the nrdlnmcv Itself. IN felt M1• was rent amtrol and was concerned aver the lasdat of tent .,hero' W a0reeaed a dseirs to st.bll.ft a aomttWe to work with Me vealtors and counall regarding this mater. star" Pate urged passage, of the ordinance as Haan as poul•de. sgd tadka um.d vouall to appmvo the oNla.M. sD-n Morrism spoke M oppoalt IOn to what Mr. D1041 ataaJ. He oppoaeJ Me ..t that Ulu Monloa vas like Mamho Cuo.aongb end called Me aamo.,lat. W stated that a Nrwawa.r had ads a LbAAr stat.unt at a menL Mating, •Vann p11krM. Owner of No"Lll sobile Mhor, enoamged am'Gil to stay wl.h Me oMMeaoe May already had and to got a grotp together to u+t. etrt Drldga coke "&mill •ont control aIthc,Zft he was wry syWAM:J to Ness In the sudl.neo Mowevar, 1e aproaed amtam Mat newt ocatrol would .tJ future waMl^pant of While hart parks. Used being no further p cello lrput. IOyor Mliols olo,od the putllc hearing. After eon dlaouas Wn by Counoll of the proposed ordlance, le.yor Mlk.ls pre.ented • list of his mamatlms yoMtMJ nut the ..pane. of dash{ a, VA. staff else lnrolwed, court oasts, future 1lllgatlon coats for Me Lenart., possible deterloratica or Israel plus Me at of WaldlaberMg the ardlrare .lotions holed by adhloaer, aeamded by Frost to Ciacoatinus omaed.mtlm of the pro,hossa urllreewe and to eta, with the pruent urethanes CounotINA Dahl stated that the existing ordinance MMId be 'hang" aerl have was binding arblbstiou added. CJmcllsen float feat that rent control voila to critical to the Ntury develJpsent of the City. W read all tlas of hwa1M for all Sncom levela, and rent control would be Very ovatoWtlre Mr, gwawet stated MAL rawwll needed o silks a denlalm to proceed. but be was amddel" +hat dine J. punitive r silts dWld soee about t ... Was of the work that altws Jy Nb Won none. Ds ft It C.hanll aboold be wat"NI rose this so that It wild not happen lactlan arrl.d by the following Yetnl AM, :ahlosar. Fraat. Meals Wes: Dahl. &-,.at kMf81t Iona Wyor M1k413 Called a Mo•a at 6 40 P... 1hs o.tla Mnmr.Md at 900 pas. I 0 Will, all sss6ars of Camail .nd start present. 16. "VIP M2nTAL LWII3 KtAJ_An KAVNPO OEVIL7�61.0i (79TATIV6 Tr11a 116m ANO I1 - 1LU:1. cTe of aeon foal U-1 (s1W 10 fully resbenilal 190 R- aultipte full[ rgldeat:allplanml aevolopeent)." the deaelopeent of 76 ccodoetnlue wills on 11.03 4are6 of LM at the nerthve.t comer or Mi,hls.d and 1161-0 As.. - APO 201-262-23, 2p 30, 31, 37 40. Staff report 01 Jack tae. Mayor Mikels opened the watt" for pualla eearleg, T^.m "Ing as ranchiao the pualto Marla, v,* aloeed. City Clark Vueersu read the title of Ordlmnc, ft. 166. ORDIVAICI W. 166 (..0.44 nadin{) 111 Cn!MARCE OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF TO CITT OF RLWCHD CDCMmLOA, CALIFORNIA, RITOIINO =Z330A -3 PASCAL NUMBERS 201- 262 -26, 23, 30, 31. 32 AND 10 LOCATO AT THE NOV,f,CST MIXER OP NIONLIND AND 14TLM AVENVE3 FROM N -1 AND t -3 SO 1- 3 /I.O. W.tloat !bred M Dahl. seconded by 3ohlosser to onto* further readlry or the Ordinance no approve Qtlioence No 166. Motion carried by in. follovin, vote, O n: Dahl. aquet. 3ahloser, Frost. Mlktla. 6D613 None. ABSENT$ acs AC. WD MA AMINDIM CRAFTER 16.12 AV T,2 AafND CUCAMhy1k MUNICIPAL LOZE Np -tjTNp TO /AAN An FLULLXTJG1 LLYDy pgLr •:a ntlwta Slab ®Ma ua aAUyea nealting true we assay. of Sonya 1411 1765 authored by senator roan. stiff report by 6111 Molloy, City Clark Vasearown read the title of hNinanco do, 105.6. GADIhAVCE K. 10:A (uaw✓. reading) AN OMDIVANCI Of TOO CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or MACAO CDCYpn1, CALTIORATI. Y010IW CHAPTER 16.31 or TOM mgCNO COCAh=A MUNICIPAL CODI •.ATINO TO PARE AND ICCMVIOl' LAND INCLOOV ,AVIKS Pi'IVISI00. Motion, Maven Of Cchloaaers boonded by Indust to Weir, .*urthor reading of the oedlmnc*. Motion earned umnlewsly 5.0. Mayor M kels opemd the retlng for puello hearing. Iddreeaing Coumll vent step Vlllts, NIA, pusstlomd Section 3(0) end the credit allovrd touaM be do.Ioper'* fees. sAAIUh Louie. L.vl. MOSS., questioned the carding of ...live nareattan,' Mr. Dough.rty responded MIS vordlua bud One taken frog the Ioren gilt itself. Thee gain{ do further dovernts, be pall. hearth, we closed. Motion: MaVed by LLau00. 4e00h"d DY SChlo l.r to apprme Ordlmnes 1'0. 105- 6. Wtion curled 0y the follwp„ vonel ATC31 DWI. aqua,. sdhloeav, Iran, Mlkcla. 900, Nam AUGHT, Vmp 0 S. Cl,-( 11ANIDRn-S STIrr AtTORIS SA. rMA. PRM TRArric AD Y Inn Cpp1TTCC AMAMIDO C"TIIr CAV D prQUtST IT T4ANM ATO.`16 AND 25TM STRC,T. Staff report by Lauren Na•eermn. The City'a Trurflo COeatt.e reyleued Me request for a cratemd CuAM Wd he. deteroMed that Me Into, ... tlon Jobs not net Me uarrante vhleh are &deft.d by M. Stet. inn used by twat egewma. Althuugh Me Mtsrs-0ttw does haw. spprovirtsly 65 .bnool children creasing In Me manWl AM wre thin 100 I. Ma afternoon. M. rehlcuLr train, is less than ooe-0alf M. Yolue . Mamaoded by the tote. Tharrfom. the Trofflo Comitto has reaebaended ay Lam• the nlaaaaent of a eroHlry Vsrd at Me Idtereoctich. M. NAAaerman also reported Chet aloe. M. issue vas presented to the City. Me City bo MaV.11ed a wJ..trlw oro.aualk at 35th Streit W Turner AY.dua. &pDrOY1I-%. speed lialt bigned noting a whool woeq and a canttr line Me Dun painted on T mw Avenue m order to prop.rl) dlr •t trafflo througn the area. Mayor Mlk•ls O"had to sating for public coom.t.. Jaen being ten.. the public portion Of Me rvwldg Nap oLu M. PotIw1 [bred by Dahl, a.awded by frost to conour with Me flnJMgs and noesrndatlons of M• Tnffib COealttoo and to deny no rw.est for a ' crosaaq guard. Potion Mrrivd wunimau&ly 5 4. 59. AJ]A LMA LTIINKM A9 UIRE PT DISTRICT, diary [.port or Lloyd Kibbe. ` Umoll aowld.,bd a r..omeM.tlw to approve oentroCto for design AM desQopwnt of on Assu•eant Clatrlet to cwitmot W Alto for Cnuu:el hoe A a north City halt to Me Intorarotlon ulth Nerewa bww. Mayor Mikels opened W watmg for Wbllc input. addressJU Cmhoil uarer -Doug I" expressed that Mar• ern o nuober of d••alnage •ituatlons that ern not wlfor. OM felt MIL anther Aaus.wnt District Mould be fonard to address Me Mellen Avenue problea. It.. N3111. •tK ... ad Wok. to the City. Then being no further Rpm hoe the public. the public portion Of the i Meting We 01w". Po110"1 loved by gahl ... Or. ..sond-d by gcguat to proceed ulth Me 0latrlat formation and to authorlae Mee ry0r to *--cuts aV.twnt. vIM Aaawlat.J nut ... ra for $166,000 for deal," and 125.00 for uess._vnt ehatnearM, to bt dram Jr. store dram fees, and &*prove Me toorwNe of paywnt And lbn &,,«unto. Motion .emlod vnenLoo,Ily 5 -0. 5C OD!t310TRATION Or "U." TOP ISSURINCD ?Vii, Mr. Nsa.errn present" the Staff report. Mr. N.-urman stated that the ally Attorney Me su4..ted Wt ve Mould require the abesnl• to PI -Iid- A fidelity Donl for Moes Individual. vorking (Or Me cWany in order to have coq protection throuth wnda in case the OOw.r,/ rills. uyor Mlkela Opined M• wetW for Dubll. Input. fora being Oboe. M• rubllc portion of MS ..it" vat closed. 21 E Nottonl Moved by feat. IsaOtded by 3Mlosser to appr ,j M• avurane vltt Car' Wmn Cowly to ldelud• Llp I Uw,vnt of a fidelity hvt0, notion allied , rentrwat S-C. 6• -.TY AITHM HPORT1. Me city attoroay pia nothuy to :port. 7. mnsciL Mims. 7A. II AR! CDPN1TffA. 3urr report 07 Sill Noll•y. Myer P(Dau ONkOod Me rvetMS for while 1ewt. IDars WAS ho rod Ma public herd" or the m,LLAS vas 0Iosw. .ranee. notla: Moved by Dul, speeded by frost w epprorr Aesolutlm Moo. 32.103 ud to vlea the entire naune Mixon u,led uunbwUy 5.0. City Clerk w".-Mn .ad Me title a. Aesolutla W. 32403, ALWLOfIOA W. 82401 A "MLOr20p N T12 CIrT CONCIL 02 11 Ciry N uSCW CDCAn093A. CLUMNIA. LTTAILI31II1A) : rev. ADTIddA7 C4MIT" TO ACT It u •40011 CA/ACITI TO Tie CIT7 COMIL W NL1743 2CATAIII110 TO ?Am An At'f,ASATI01 IACILIIIty Nfn10l IM CITY N SLKDO COCUOAOA. Cwatl aoxvrred Met apwlntenta vwld W ado at tau 0•oeber ISM a.ttM •uro wdpr the Cll ttud M•es Sudan of the AS.Us. CounWl also cawrrod Met • Me prwuur• .wld be that the Myor world Meat flu Aaaes and the Ctvnoll weld ntIty -lea. 7a. ADOM 1101. C.Ua31CRDAiIN Oe CNA}rrw.e KUI NACNAlE It" wv Added at the reweet of CwullktM digboti therefore. W. tipuu Presented & report W t'p 11. M atetad Met he had IMM approached by &. epee]• that the Chrlltasa 11 u we W for sal•. M had stop •e•enl amtaaia with Sa broardla Count/ ace and the City of Ontario W ace are 17pe of joint effort Want be ea. M Firow.6 Me Christ "• Omue *Mee It na or historic interest. After a I"My dluuaelon. Cwnall done, b that then We not e to put +Lather a lal�t eentwre "01,.10 Sao Derurdl O C .tyand itpe City :f Ontario by Me Drc a r 1SLP 41"I Me for bide. Ciao. dwbt We eye: taud by pore of the ao0Wlusea eye Chet anyca vwld eland $200.001 end then Wrn 8h and ter, Me prolsot Can. Co Wll corN.urod Mat rUcOs .10 hot Avllable enrol years -so wv the proledt flvt are before Council at a whin, price of 66010000 and fun' were still not *Unable tad.! for Me proJeot. In order to protect the property, Cowell reArred Me Ste to the Dtatnrust Cmalulon to lock Into Ma pculalllt or ahetCM, Me hluorlul dells:+, la fra that of Dlstarlael Intent to Dlnorlal laddurk. 3. ADJW'WMT. notion: noTw by Dutuet, ueydW by 3.'h3ouer to Wlwrn M• rulry. Pectic* tarried unenleuWy 5.0. The aeet p,a, tos idlwrnu at 10140 3eepsetNily eubWtted. Dacsater 15, t902 . CITY Of RAACDO COCA"WA CITY CODSCIL WMnZ3 hrulr M,etln. I 1. CALL ID ORDER A rteular Sooting of sM City Ce nsll of the City of Santo CucaMrW na MI6 In M. Wos, FIM Coo salty Gnur, 9161 Sate Line bad m Vadmseay, Wc.eher 15, 1962. The retie{ Mal eallod W order at 7110 p.o• by tit /or Jon D. hik.7a. Present wrel City Counoll Meters A1eMrd M. DWI. Charles J, liquet II, Phillip D. Schlosser. Jars C. frost. and 14Tor Jon D. klkeln Also prsaout tyres City timber, Lauren P. Vassormnt City Attemer. Idoard A. Matson, Cwtunity W"lopmot Olreoter, Jsak WI City ruiner. Lloyd 01jsees Fiume Dlreator, tarry Rapoyl 1—Ity 3."1.0. Dirootar, Sill 0olleyl am City llswe•, 11Ck Cwt• Apptvr. of t tll: 11mlonf 1iC," by IYhl. saoondso by 3ahlouar W approve the oloutro of 0oreater 11. 1962. toolon carried umnloo.laly 0-0. 2. AVn003CLY'tTa a. Ph,. Sehlosser prmounC.d M uwld not be attending the J•husrp 19, 1901 City CamCll Mott". t. City Cl.rk. Idur.a VaesaMn. reeuo/od a CWS" "Went to be bld . foil"" Me rqular MoliK or We City Cetamll, am also reaueatod that It" 111 M tM com.nt oalenA, to wntrA W DMIV6e Me edditioml out of 8500 for an 011. Taut oast of Io:n vgrmst s17.5;3. 1 f0'1l6T CAMTlAa a Approval of Wrralts. "sister b. 02.1245 in Ms out am su of 7122,671.67. to Aleo.'tolto aa,era0u Application for Star, M Nsrklas am Rados, Mira, IV." f1:u, 6600 -B Base tine Read, for On Sob Ram s VW LiceMa. 0, Alcoholle leverage Appllutlon for rdeW 0, ant bM M. T1ocMr, IMldal"% Deliamesasn, 0790 19M St., rap On Salo &or s VWa Win, Plata L tense. d AIa W.pILe 5ardnbe ApplICALWn for J. end Amron Us Blruson, ham's, 0109 Stn Rsrurdlno Ad., for On Sole Gmral fu01lC Promos, L /come. e. Approval of CMrys to the Drtanl:se Boar Arles and the r.derol Aid Orm, 3,.too. Re.SOLVrl01 No 62.201 A AMEA)TIOR N /DC CITY CWWIL Of = CITY Of 7AWA) COCIJ WA, CALIMIZA, MIGNATIM CTRTAIR ROAD3 M at 10 1110 rIDCaALAID URBAN 3TSTD1. I." S- �p f Accep4me of Reel Property laproveeent CanArsct and Llea AOre.wat far 9757 Liberty Strut suWlttM by Say and Manor Jones. AMOLUTION 10. 02 -I05 A ABSOLUTION Of M CITY MICA or IRS cirr Or Pam + COCAVIONOL'. CLL110011A. ACCCRIIN) A ILAL PAOPIATT IIVIOTDISNT CO.V7IIACT AND LIm "IFEV ENT no" PAT AND hANCT JONES An AUTHORISING INC HATON AND CITE CLAIR I0 SICB 3YR. N. CoorrrV tloo W.Vanit ulth the County of Sap Bsroardlno to Prorlde AasUtaaee An ObtatnlK LLB. 103! IA Itlp1e rally SoAsing port{.{. Bond. This SgreWOt Prpeddea for San Beriardlro Catmp to at a tM issuing Whorlty for a wltlple rally W,tAsts btol laeu to be used on an approved WItlPla really how,IAS d•selopwnt east of Archibald Neva. and 190 St"A!. h. Request for approval of r$Sht -af .q daauwnta for final rwlnlo, paraela In 4nwwot D3aMlat B2 -1. R.-Mirr /on W. 62 -206 A ABSOLUTION Or TUC CITY COUNCIL Cr Tug CITY or PLIM CVCAICIZA, ACCSffI'G C"ZIS 01 DEDICATI011 rOA SIIUT IV STDAH TRAIN WfN3TJ IB A32= ear DISTRICT 10. 02 -1. 1, Isla" of DOW ae1 Boll.. of Ccaplattoa. 'PAM-1 Shp 6322 - located a roothlll Blvd. use of flneyard AV.. (Ceaeo) owners Lauls DAYelOpwnt COIL Wfarsu.a. Bond (Feed) 6223,000.00 RrSOLOrior No. 62.207 A RBSOWTICS OP TRR CITT CMSM OF THE CITY Of RAN= CVCDIOIq i. CALIFORNIA. ACf6PTIW M PUBLIC IWROVOIINTS r0A Pmn my 6322 IF, AMOMINO M rILIW Of A IGTICR 0:' %WMUIOS FOB M Von. J. R.Cusst Loan to Mdne]aJwnt Pienoy to fund Dar DuY Bureau of Re00wtlrt C,�aL Total Vaunt or Loa r"vest Is Abandon to A17..aed• potion, Pbrad by Schlosser, uaonCed by frost. to approve va Conaast Calendar as p:eaented, potion carded unsulauuly 5 -0. 1, PUBLIC WRIMA. 4, vPC1TT5 Or no Y.R9IOR ROAD IDCATtD DY M =UTLGTDP or IOOt11TIJ. ALro. IN Co��l fof t r Request to nttnu. vpliflK the ..Liu. o An. service O Abe .athaldn of rnotL.11 SClllrard Sp VWI.tlon alto hreel My 6114 aIb.Itt" by Vista Investasnt. Report by Llovd Itlbbs. tt Yor Nlkela opened Me ..,Ins for public bear". There Ming rmoe. the p,bllc Peering na closed. MAWS Weed by Buduet. seconded .y Schlosser to continue Itea to rebruary 2, 1961, City fnwoll wutnB, potlan eerrled uanlwusly S-0. • 6. FL1rtA0 MAL A>7— IDD TdL CgAIOC 6I-0 11DCAL. A than,, or Ass frog M1 ldlr,U Iu11I Uslwnt"I to A-7 ULItIpU Full) 4aldegtbll la 2.07 acres of lsof 1wsUd on the --I also or Irchi -old Armua, ervth or Memo TISU Otrest . An 202.13t -61 Axis 62. DUfr Pryers, If Als! Cows. Mayor M'.e1- -penes the w-tMA Per public h4PU,. I Gw Uarm, 21914, bWal6., A,ours, -uoer of the pmjaot 11m ed M Vac pnargt to WT eel "films eAOell my U.e. ibors being; De rather respeaw, the pcblle Leiria, vas elsaaa. j city Clem Hl nrreae read no tine or .rdtnaws b. 167. OSDIeAOCC 00, 161 (first name,) AS OMUNCIC OF THE CITY COMIL Or m Cm or t1AM COCA`MA, CALUDIXIA, ,r=lm AST620,•0 IAeRL IUa6CI 202. 131.61 AO 62, ICCAM DO ra OClT "It OF AICHI6AID ATfi19, NORM Or ry,yC VMIA smar n0.T hi w ,.3. Ma11003 Mired y Pohl, eeeaodad y 6eblauar to "too rMrther ""I" or Orolmws b W. Mrticn carried uueliwsl) Q. Msyar MU-U get Jamsy S, 1963, for waaod rlsdMA or the o.Mlwws. C. QIII'nn0 AeMCAl10! an 1 --IW 96 141 emtAtT3 DT37111 T MO t Ice 321n PD. I2paD. 6UPC report by Lye 141 -oa. Mayer M kols wdmd Of Motto, for "bile bile,. There ,00 w reapenu Of paella hS4rin, as closed. city Clerk Uueraan It" the title of rauletlan U. 62 -706. 6fO1.OT10! 60. 62 -206 t ATJOLOIIOO OF Tl3A CITT CUOICIL 07 TOM CITY Of AA= CCAMOlOA, CALIJVVIA, 0,017219 TH9 WI% in COCOICTIO! V.n AARKIMM W. 11 TO Lm"Ca s MAINIC,AKC OIlFTAICT 60, 1 I0, TCACT e0. 120:0. M-tlonl tared by Dahl, seated" 67 rivet to plea owthr, rota is, of W- lutloh 62. 206. 11291" esrrlsd ametsaual7 5.0, ebUant "Do by Cehlouer, lesonded by )root U adopt Usolutioe b. 62- 206. mtlm cirri" wanlaaoslT 5.0. S. CITY MA1 "'S m A. IT MILL 22Mn} CLOD DIM AOIC HIAVILZUTldt, Story report y Llya bob. Urlw of repast trap Ld hill Cocnty Gob U ponlai"te In epmlvvatlo- of ral..nln, -all to •Ublllse alye u red Mlll Caton" Clob Drive north of Foothill Old. Cen:twed troy 0ete0er 20, 1962, Meth, U Ore., to obtsm seny Or prq,o4 lime, h. IU-ba ats4rd 4,s, In.7" /n�armttm wild m -O.tlr ir4 Ir. Cive Would litre Of tgarrunly U discus. lM project with ecunell. At this itw, Mr, SchloeseP si".1d hlelelf free Of . -anon Uhl. I. j a C ... so Crta. nis ,aural key, Upland, rap"senl Wg tod hill Couty Club, Me cbte Ma: • report frees a sods engtoe,r . a state, the bl." Is unstebl. In Its praseOt Whoit.m ra asfa,nP • recoauuted lsprarlot Mt do Lug• to proven, ester going to the bluff area fPOr cos slope and Wlldlng a retaining moll. The County Club Me al"sdy l"raved Me dnlnsge. W. Crun also gated docta.ntatlon use neat Lnle W ,net Mara prapn4y line, van ls:stod eud Me east of loo.tte.g property lines voula probwly be in exec!) or M. coat to r.Inforne Me bluff. M OC st.d couwll OCOeat his prapaeal to Install Me ntaWing tell VIM led 1-111 C fiLry Club paying a cast. of 110,000 sad Me city paying the " &dl d ptrtlop of 11,050. Mayor Most. stated It rJobt of way vu so ft. fray center, city property +told, In hat, be looted On Me soli eve-se. W, Crun staled that we C.""t. par, suduet uprooted curer@ about teats .at added tort@ of Polecat) ag thus retaining tell If the teat Loaded to M vWened W the futaee fenndrrablr dtaovsslai we hold "garOWg the right Of w1- Laing 10 rest frees ced•.- and dueroMLg Me one, probary line. W. budget suggested so altortatlrs solution vau!d be W e.tMr tabor the bluff or to ..pond Me alreh of Me rood. We Cr, a stated tee retailing w11 weld to MI least "city to to co.wt Me p.<ul". W. Wpeen stated it Me bluff to on City property, the city has Me entire royonslblllly to corren: MI alt xatlon. Myer 111Y.la asked .bout rastrlot' ens If Me Load our. P ltat.y penal and Me ally correpap the Valle. W. hOp'an stated to litigate a potential lop", On the adjacent pdbll0 proporty it could to a Jwtlflable unpandlWrs. It sonneae'o prlvbte property tws up M 0s public right Of t'ey It IS bgw.eplly M.Ir rupa ulblilty W r+o0ro It. os vould cot, hewru, like W ro. a shoat Wa Man an Injury oc..m nee It prleala property we to fall M yubllO right of lay And Me public entity tad noticed ttur. ns • probtru, even If the Wool. ire amnrnlog prices. laedl "bite catity "cases responsible M Lost 01rtusstaao. W. gadvOt stated a pncod.et amid be wt and other requests Could 0e subsisted to We catty to reacts, for ezenphl, ouealypbu tree. W. Nation stated if am-, it did ant teal ceelorteble geing along VIM the Project talus proper sur.ys sun l.bsL t.0 11Mer by gee hill ar the City LUTA.". tau Mi. project mould wt be ucdlr "' Mayor Mtkels aaud if a title carob mould " wfflalut W Meate buanlsflu " ou"OundW prop.yles Imo "a Moue 1MOS W d terstn0 property Lines Or the prepoud r.Wlnlnp tell W. lubb, stated a kawo 1We would Mee W be eatebllMed an one aide of Ihn b+unf , or Mother. for Wunday llat wuW lure to be established and 013 coot* red.lr. a whey. to "Lanes to a duration by Myor hlkele rerJNing ulual :eat of sun ", W. lolls replied It to dependent on tau utemlee Me engineer "We W dot probably In t st.000. 1,,000 range. Myer hitch opened Me mail" to MI public. Thera "Ing .e response, Me Not$. O11tI00 .1. al ... d. W. yeast Inquired a to one suns Me vall and liability If ae,rshlp of Me property w. net "brained. W. Car stead if eouiatl proceeds .1, I"JrOt aonatNOtlOn of tell could be supsylsea by city and Oltf .14 WlntaM the wall teal hill Can." Club .,to aalntaln MI top of Mee .11 l nuud and prC, . c.e.telll h,Mr:el betwen the tell am the bash. Mayo, M kels sakes the a.teopr if Inter a wwa, were to show the law to Swvstum was private "d, but aeershlp of the rail wee the city... Mr. !!Waco vas rot abl . prOSlde an answer at MM Me. Mayor Mold eNrvwd Concern regarding inralvement by Ma city In ownership ~ and s 1.1anaoee of a structure m benefit private prpporty. 14. hcpaon stated if Me property line is eventually aatactiabed to the satisfaction of the city, Mich determines the wall 1s co private Must Me wall, es"tansZoO Of lite %all, and caletebaas, Of tiro slope would betas Me reg,ndibadiy of Me Country club. If Me street were widened vith future dwdlopeut, It could W reslble, M establish anglneariRg dotuesn"tlon at Met ties. Mr Wit In agrnaent with foumllsab "uat, added property lids should M detereMes, but aln fall It was not ecmomically feasible. FA wU..tm the clay participate In Installing the nteloing wall to the atnt el $3,500 . irun. X,. trust asked about Me holding opacity of Me road mad vneatcr More world be a need to video Ma road. W. Wbbs replied core than a two lam rued was me naesM or desirable; Mere ay be fature vldanlug on Me south mod asst with Rev developest. W. trust ekes if the road could stay M its eluting seta. yr. mutts rolled soee areas would benefit by remncvating miner Imo Imr.lng Me capacity of tin mad. hr. b l X,".d cmctlood VIM leaedisM --lability Me city weld t , If Md rdt vaanaa away. haybr hike" sakes if coomll decided "build Me mra tee find out right of way Is 40 feet from enter and city decided Me, want m m"tcoeme Or owersh:p our wall. W OOpam replied, the city would rcRHn a Cntrlbutlm rra 41 hill COntty CIO M construct publle lmrwement. If a private wall ® is constructed one etq property, We city could do Nat It wanted " with We a11. City cou1J Out own Me .11 If Me lard I. privacsll woes. Ownership of .11 Ia dependent m oharrhlp o. Me land. hr. treat twggadaed Russell m back M Me budget P.... VIM MIS along with eaDlul Icprovesen" nro3e4t. our. DMl !naulrSd u to the traffic roust. Mr. iNbbd situated 3.0000.4,000 cars our day. Mr. Ounvat asked without determining Men Me property 1"e Is, vast would happen if property Owners m the south and cast decide to igroee property and we fled property lire „hen Me cents, Sid ld at M" Ilse. we could madlble and up VIM a one line road, e Mr. true a"tm Me crib block wall is ea, tee remove if mcesaap. hotiom 6rauet soved to sad n action on this 1.1.11 Wtlon dlea for lack Of ..cond. Mltlonr frost mvrd to direct td City USlneer M Include OR his list for lm'uJlm Is tho W194tarl cCrolderatlon wlaw for capital lco"TK ents by the Cltlteus Advlsoq f-WLUIOn and City Council for the fiscal year t953- n1 wetonsed by "hl Mr. fr.v statm this offer Will to wi Mdnv. at Me and Or tin year when Me bid arptres. `'' red Pbtlon Carried by the following rots: AIU. Dahl, Frost, Mlkals. "WI pup et ADS=. Schlooyr. Mayor Mlke]e Called A rveeda a: 6:37 P.m. The sooting reconvened at 6:51 p.a. with all gve0ere of the Cowell and staff prssmt. 6. CITY ATTORMIS 11TO S. 7 C0014CIL A. SELMIO.R OF REVRIM VfATIVR FOR WAOM Weep. W January 51 follOwing SAkBAO "Bung, a repreaentatlr0 to Swell Gloat Air Ooa13Y HIMS.adt Dlatriet Board will be selected for "A. tea yea- apoolntaent. WTOr media reoussted Connell Input regarding uniCb weNae co auppart for too saleetion. ]Cana sInditt" for nalostio. ere C .Mcilrsn TO. Urger, City of Rlaltor the councilvoa0 Faye DasttwV, City of Ontario. Mr. Print stated sine. • .......e"tive Roe our icedlate ".laity should to to our aOvaOteger he ncoousendo Faye DaatruD to sane on tae Board Matlon: loved by Frost, ascended by Uquet to support Coumilu=n DeatwP fcr nwimtim a representative for WAQMD. Motion carried wanicOUaly f -0. R. CIV CpRtCIL AP70IHTC7rT8 III PAR[ ADVISOR} CRMITLC6. Myer r1kels •mwnced TI..ant to wwly adopted Ruolttion 2 -'03 creat,hg • Park Advisory Ccoltt,e [Ann were five seats ont Me coeaittee that needed to be filled, and recc_eWed tee rollout" to edudoll for ntltlnt.on. Pu Hsory, LIVIA VAllanee - AICI loo T. Merrell All., Pater Pltaaai - Qlcanegp it. "Me - Cties." Pas Men" to serve as Chalrporahn Mr. Frost neo =eMed Raebo Creole to serve on the eovlttee Matlom :bud by Dahl, seeended by DuCuet to ra'ity recoctonlatlOD of Myer Mllols. Hotlw carried Ueenleo.aly 5-o. tOyor Mlkele sonoaneed the eeetl:ga would he held the third Thursday of each :ant", the first ceetltg n be held In January. :oCalttes aipolotbanta -elect to take effr Ns thlre Thursday of January. Myer Mlkela reex -moo! MAY be aopolntao a cdevitte. peraooarLet to Nn temv exbod -0 ene.rr.t w1n the first aetI.S. Mr. Cshl r.c.hMd c coup c 11 direct Dill Molly, Cooudtty terra.. Director, to provide Park Adv1a;7 Co_a.ttes a6enh at no January City Coanc" neting. C. tba R^a5 RWSC tl Bne.et 1ru.herd • Oliatas Mwao .;date. If bid. for the Qvtetsaa Mouse ware not sce.p"D.. •non eprneo peeves., 15, 1962, he felt the Drina Cw1J possibly be re...e. and .e ewld negotiate wIN owner. of the house Ml UJIUst reweated oily rounell 911. uDDOrt to oovvant of house to C.c_.arva- C.+;ti Para rl D ftl added that by acing Into a llelt" Joint Our city cold retain a say In the unageant and Oeo for the betldi". 0 00 63 11 Dlercalm may tvu re.erEly enov3ay 1Dw..aL La the uNlalt/m of tM IVOvLtaa Daw Ina 7elat Future ed also aoaalDle raWre aaea of the Douse. 'by c' q ets felt TN louse dm10 raaaln to me city. Sat waalDlF D.ecaa uuDlla6el to as Dlawrlul 3acaat4. rat1cfs fbru by &q t, tacatld by OtDloaaer to et0reee F a Act e...A N perttalwtL, Aa tAe atptlsltlon LItDa a( ire Carlsteae race v mrroent w the rutaaatg.{,uaat! UsAo tl Fart to eamemAc. uitt the City or O terla. San DerDedlno ft t7, cot Drlwte eetwr. l =[u Frost. NYele.. fo3lmfy raw. /tL1t DMl. &Kuet, rgelouar. rr. Fuat eceyntd that e(rorte emla M gent by wraics e,,M eJw . cemr aaC tatmratics the ute L� Ne a1ty. a. AD.10l1.oM_•f, ration[ I d by DaDl, tiara[" by r o.t to dlmrn w alesd wutan mt w ..ronrrty. fbtltn ""led aaaatatnely 5-0. lDe —tLy sa7aurccc at 9+30 r.a. fee camn•y sumittei. mrr W. wetly Dep,ry CltF CUa S Jamarr S. 1963 CrrT tY N018p C ICAMMA CITY COMOCII. MIRTD rsaaW Mrotax 1. Cal, M Cyr. s 1 S,gw De"twg of tat City Caoeli or tat city or bo,00 Waaaooea as wd W too l.ioa fart Coasmltl Cm, 9161 soaa I.foa And w 9ado"Nay. Jaaoa -y S. 1587, lL meatio8 ma rullod N order by /lap, Jai D. Mlaols at 7115 D. -• 9leseat eve: City 1 11 11t ,, 1I.. M. Vaal. CNrlat J. 9.rrt Jr. Folllip D. DC1osa"r. Lao C. rewt. ood Popr Jos D. rlulo. !lo C 1. woe City Ifaot6er. lame" M. lwsv : at, Ittorory. y ,t vogc ty; fieQedtr Varolopat Director. itoa W; Ctt1 rlamar. ■lok Coats. City 8oalatar. Lloyd l6t ; yiaaoto DLlettr. sort, rap07; and Coaamlty %arson D.rntor. mu Mellay. 2. 1ffJUp:lYJm3. Ma,or M." s00000ad Nat tIt1= opprdraa a :0 128 olala ror oi¢owlts alor, tat mrN aide of sow LL Cam soll. Jrem. to N" bUh a I. ltrpr Caou LaaamCad tint Fora Vastrop ame lt9>larad u eta Sao llrtDUdloe Com11 xsraamtotiw w tae ScoN roost Al, 0"31ty 14m6eamt N . Maror SC.tolo amewoad teat S+rm Moa.x std Daau appototw' No Q+aira of �I W CitL-ees Wauxl as ioa. J. wt=f7 �. S+ff rw9 aatad t-,, Mewlatiw ltd. 83-6 a r .w odder ltoa n -. Gytr MStals rage l tot Stec -1- u dehmd to Na Jamrr 190 o etit6. b. coal aa'ad for slam -hails of Itme % -, to it apeot oould"ruu time dla Iog ila, IoOrrtov of too .l . Mr. Moll", ooDlalard Na (aoume � a y the Mlatoriool Comeisaloo omaIoar,d Na ralfso o1Olrierat. 1Sr. ramt road tar loot oaattnq of Na tuff eepOK wide suNd. -u tDa .ldo,a. ata old sofma rise u dn-up that axe. It sold be uair tvwotlsilltf to roue a tateremimal to dutantla ale cal. u dtocen IbY ftj, al .1calflow, or ,..r taermf. lie rtat wl slut too soaolotlw doe" mt Mnftt tafa fatmt. It. Mousy Stated that Nla m dla ed by tad Mlttorlral Cc I,ai altaa.0 mt art u too r"atlatlo. Caeoll cwemed Not Mr, it'll" atoold r.ntadt lolrrraltl of so 1.7 N Sao 14 a tLalr talaad has std to orcava6s tame N u.tisau law tats. N.twt Strad by Stsltaat -. "eatded % Vaal u spprwe tad Cmamt :"leader adN tae r..estiom of Item -I- sad ■tsolotlw x. 836 to ttea - :. Mott. r.xtad emniovals s-a. s. yt16.IC QJiIAMS U. 7KjEAL ASTPS46RT AND ZONE CRA.NDL 82.0 - BINAL. A e0arye'Gf a. Am P -1 aWBU tullr nslGntlal to 9-3 (multiple family residential) for 2.02 sans of land located on Ca west aide of Arohlbold Avon... north or Pointe Plata Street - ON 202 - 131 -61 end 62. ltaff report by Rita, Ones, City PLVner.- City CIOM Nsaereen read the title of Ordlnancs No. 187 ORDINANCC N. 1!T (..rein "adt") AM CADINAACC W INN CITY CCOVCIL W 7701 CIT OF RARCRO COCYIONCA, CALIFORNIA, RpDAING AMMSOR'3 PARCEL 11HRIA 202- 131 -61 AND 62, LOCATED ON TIM WE" SIDS W AIICRIIAD ATEME. NORTH OF 11L`8i6 TWA 37PECT rbC1 P.1 FO D -3. ration: Ibvrd DI 8puet, nacaMed % 3nhlosser to "IT* further r.AdM, of Ordiname b. t8T. Ibtlon corded — tawlty 54. Naror M*I. opened M, meting far public hearing. There Miry no "o,won. the Wblld hearing was closed. Notions Maid by 3ebloaeer, aacooAed by Nouet to approved erdlrame do. 187 ud W approve • PrVtSVe Mo:afatlm. Milan carried by W. fallwSng vote: AM: Isdol, Bwdust, 3Wlvser, groat. "mold, Kul Ibis. 16SLFf1 Nona. U. A[ItlCO 00.T.;Aa NR IALAPD 12DIATIM MAID. 3toff rvpaft by Attic Harts, Asaoann Plainer. M•. Ibrta stated Met We City of Oltarlo did not want W enter into an aV.emnt with tau Intend Poediatim Board. T, refon. Way have rtereA into ngreweent with We Comty and City of Sen Mrnardlno. baler Wis contract we will be paying RICO bar month; under We old mntraat we wore period 4175 per eaitA. Rsor Mkols opened the ematLry ter publlo input. then Mind dole, Me publM r.-Otoo of We met" war olo.ed. Ibtiaa Wave by lbavot, ercordad by 3rhloasr to MrwllwaW We sXi.LMR emtnct with ate Veit E Iledlation board end to "ter Into Cmtnet with the IaleM dodlaticn Bnard Glory with tho Comty add City or San Bernardino; authortae 4375 to M allocated From We Co ltr Gnlopaeot Blmt D-ant (raid pay for the contractual foe different. for WC nmI.Ing assn months; to approve Peslutlab No. 83 -a; And to wain the entire Mail". lbtlm ",led uunlem.ly 5 4. City Moved Nasa.ran reed We title of Rrsolutlon No. 83-8. RETCIRICB NS. 83.8 A 2CTOL0710N OF T1¢ CITY WDTCIL OF TIM City W PANCIO LTCANOROA, CALIFORNIA, "FaCTIM A WMACR DCTVEEl1 TNC City W RABC;D NCAHWA. TIM CCONFI OF 3" BEIRANDIM, TNC CITr W IAA BCAHANDIRO, An THE .NLAAD REDIATION BOARD, A NON -PAWtT ORCADIZAT30N. FOR NRPOSM Or UTAH MIW A CCNfI1ACNAAL AARWMMWZ PROPIDINO FOR A FAIR WUSIW PROORAV N TNC RUIDENU W THE CITT W PANCHO CUCANONIA. 0 .=t 0 SB.'EM 30 IBPtiNTBTATI04 PLAN 11ATIOIIATIOV sdlf-I?. graft vpon by Lloya Whod. Staff "comants all'oral of an agr.C.rt vin thu Stn Be.rolno "..I,tsd Oowergaents to coatrlbuts $20,000 ton" the W.apantion of the Acute 30 10beentatlon plan. after a lengnl dUOwslca by Council, Mayor dte.ls opened toe mail,, for public tribal. Add,..sM, Council West •onus Was baked Co,mll At trot dlun't Consider doing an pis. ..r. no stated Chet an BLS Would coat 4twen 1150,000 to $1 billion. fiction, MvId by Sehloaar, ...Mean by Kittle 4 -.[hurls. the figor to .Igo Me asrarsents for to Ieplesentatl" Plan and to blloc.t. 120,000 (rare the Systess Nveloo:ent ford for the AsnMAo r;ebborya share, wtloa esnled ananta"sly 5.0. Wyor Mkela called a raps. at Br40 p.a. This caetng reoMemed at 9:00 p, +• .IN all amber. of Council area Staff pnYat. SC. APPROVAL 01 RTBOIATIM MAKIS.IM PARRS MBYU� staff report by 5111 Holley. W /or Ideal- opened the eating for publla leput Add"asNg Coam11 Wenl •Doug Most stated Nat W hoilnlng caoinity Ws Own t.'Vns ,bout Nees rOroUlAs, but May Mi. It .... the ., am vVe rlguree. fie a tatted Mat no we Wee against Dana. but Hey wauln lice N a able to all dorn.looe at the total f•w pckag.. add saes vp vI" ,barbing Nat .111 Work n today'. car..:. 14 ncceseoded MIL Isis belied to W studied am felt toes. feu should ant , net out11 "IS Wes don. •Pub 6.taass. Ca Builders red repnsantlnB the BA GoTcrm. +tai Affairs COenittas, s.pr.iaed lore von -"tube Wets to develop Park. and felt We say less the brad-1 ours if We Fay for ennthfni .I" oonwlta.u. -N1Dh teal- stated flat land ... D. -rc"teotl. flr,.L Dropose" are a IWO. high. W s.Pra8.d tea N....1. w" too 110 sine. star tee- Nee not gone up that such. fir, CChloaanr suggested to figure Mould hr act at $60,M0. fir. W"Ot Stated he use feprened With Met we atatad With "spent to eoluntur Santee- In puttlni n par.. rut the, did not mtu•talla am get We Dare,. fie Would a tetaneta In .,eking denlopers assistance n Me Fare. prableaa. Fur. bah, *.or .... d he Would be Interested In taking the SIA Wp WSN their offer -" se..ether the OIA raa really Interested I. Wwho Moe,. Snd Its problove rWUM ,parts, Be fr,t Mat the -D• factor should a cat at 150.000 cad at the us it. entourage the bulldlrA co sub ty I. W.rc .1N Me City t' r - batter solution p the -p- factor. fir. SMhlobar elated net wrdins •eNlIsl.nt Islas of comtruotllo- should be Ina.rtsd ,ISO. MU", MI'! ey Dahl to "ccmeM adoptlon with Me flg rb Manion tO 150,000 Far a .. or weulrnlent ealue of Ccnat"otlon with the enCpregapnt to the building Memnitl net May wn WIM the City for a Further adju, Wnt of Ise figure. ® Hr Dougherty stated this wording onens 115 up to anbiouit,y and recommended against the insertion in this particular resolution � 11 Mr. Dahl revised his t.on. Mr. SN:�ssar Stated that 1f Rs aNUgad the 0 aamnt m IIg,mD, G tsuld •eemd the Seit,,. Matim: NOW by Dahl, •ecanded by Saqloner to opprovad Nwlutlon b, g3 -9 to Mae- the figure changed to N8,D00 per aoro, trd to .,IT. the full reading. City Clsrb WSer..n rod the title of haaluCan R0. 63 -9. RLSOLUTIhM N0. 63 -9 A RE=VrION N M CITI r,,,,CIL OP TMt CITE Of RARCMa NcmMA, CALIS ala, wtA6LLSMlm AYERACQ COST PER AM n DL,a p PART LAND IN RANCHO CYCAMONOA. Milan ..Tried by the foll.W Seto, AYW, Dabl, lcmet, Schloss... M al@ NOES, Trost. A6 MI Rme. Cl¢ nark Nesser•an read M, title of Resolution no. 83. to. MILWION 00. 0.10 A RESOLUTIM Of THE CIIT ND /CIL OF T8t CITY OP mew CUCAMOROA. CA mr1IA, mkmlSMIRO POPULATImt PPJ DVELLINO M17 PON In ru"mE OP DDLDDl M CNAPPCA 1�.;2 OF TNT MUYICITAL COD= RRRTIMO t0 TAO: DEDICATICS OT PART IUD AECwnu LAND. Mayor :'{belt opened the ..'dreg for public input. Addressing Coumll wsst =YS None stated Me dvelapsra wre Serious with their offer, and thq mould eppreolsis the city council sstabll"IM a Cawnall Cossdttas of about tw menbers 14 Order to sssslns the entire Procedure' They are reaey to roll up their •lssm Sed go to Tart. 'Uri Stark Stated As mould like to get together to discuss the cost of IAW"ApinS. tie had his ltoe ..e, and felt he amid be of help to Me city ce. moll. Thor# Ming no furt"T IAPUt frm the public, the public Portion of the DO eting we .1...d. Meticm tinted by N90et, Seaooded by Proat to •dmt Mrolutlon b. 63 -10 and to va1Te W entire reedlry. Action carried usspimuely 54. 6. CITT ATTopm-s RCPORTS There wre nme T CDDRCIL WSIMS ADDO ITEAS, • Mayor city -led the City of Fontana had apprp•cheA his and rtmugd Put the Ctey Caumlt --press opp"ItI.0 to lesslhad ssacllag N root." After sops dleau•elon, Ccunall ln cmmrmd W Wising until pun Snfortlon could be obtsad. ss I. Mayor Mlkele presented • A."lt tlon frm the City of EWah, In respeat to treatment frm Ns Naua1N and Comunit/ bal-11 ens Departssnt In Seererento. Council referred the It" to staff to draft • Reaolublon tailored to our own ssperlancss. 0. Gtunall.eaa Dhl IUte0 that cojl Should mstp.no dl•m•Slan• m fief '1 • until W know Mat tepact "hams State Lgislst.an my nay. "La City rurwu. W also wgeated that staff oomfdse adjuetaents in the tuutifioatioo fees W eltamats squen footage of $'""a u a factor lD ea3ou19 tlnd Me fees. Council concurred in handling hom ttat, at the caca. d. hr. Dahl oleo stated he would like to discuss the dralWe fees after 9b. Schlosser returss, It was originally scheduled for Me jar,uaq 19th "Ittng. Cocnoll *ce,,w -rod in setting this for the fehrutiy drd casting. S. INDURla2\y. Motlont roved by frost, OC.N.a by Schlosser to adjourn. Ystlon "".ad urunlesual7 D-d, the sctlng adjourned at lord p.a. Me.oaatfully submitted. Beverly tuthelet Deputy City Clark yy •..J1r E ' ^ Sr. 1 '4 •1 :` V�.2 1 Y `1j i.:Ir: � n �•ti Y[.�,7�y'' r4; t.Y Lrt4 ).'/ �i~ it 1 I I I • ; {•!!ti waov «o..... eOO°pY� °oop +we N°oo.rp .w..ewvpmnoa.«oowP.N•paP°aar f .. V • oNropnNNp«Pp°.af r opo� C P Pr. ........ ..•i . axeouNP.oeo.eeropron.°opoP.e ffl )"+ W;� Y�aoe�ww�P..�.'.N.Npcip,na _ oNPe°�noMm.fNC Ppo•,rvNOO:e,n':,. -w P.. «,•,.:Ppe ti y�W Sr PN«NN.NPiii aw PvY: .f.1 D„hrJpN �N^ i0A N I1 N �NNN .I O afnf�1 f /fr j'L'• ,)�i• , �/ ''_l .1 � r •••hln Y� t t �- 'pq• ,1• ([,' 4• (l.)i•;. �' �yjj{ '.li. "7.r. L�_ - it•,. ,.`}., 3J'NNf/MYMW,i I, w nM., NM1nnMMM., NnY1,•, I, MMMmMPn1,/ wf• nPYw�vn •1/•afwT.•Mwnnf•M.•/p• ^/• I, _ OW VevvOgWOVOmA.00v0OY q0P imOV VOVaRfCVOawvmmvegpvam _ j •Y•lf f ..PVOpnr. f. apMaV• n.• r. �PPpPPPPPPPOPpOPPPPPPO�r rpYpspPOPPYPP�_DppPPV pp JPY�WP i. �x0 MrN•'a'M•�•p000pPpOOOOpOOp w.•fraw.0 -- 'h! r' rr• t: Ny: • -• .�• &cb1 r ,r ,i - 1 1 1 5�... 1" -fl '(.J r:, iaai..v j W u .I ef� ./ "r�'w. ,d `•(•Il:tl - N... is VSj L Y•lN,y IS L4v J Oelr `r S �c i. /• �S� 7 I WV) w :J N •;a� WS S W UJAV nL.r (J,W.6 Vry I �� w pWf ` WaYNI �JS iF L >+- w�«ina� vL o.•Jgo �LZU' s �•¢owr.a,....xq- J4upJV _ {z J >c zip w.W« o °.W >.�nem a •wo 1�'•�: •CStiL O PW:)VV,•C W..I.n 2 S1pf >' v pRf }Vm >r'JNL SW.USL ft_ ' . • N¢.Nrp21 W)l,w�>WalVwV i _ V i �,'•iiJit�- fJ {alaifJFl�•• `xyti)Cf iOt.Y W •U -OOR WO�YO�Y�{J O �d YaiiNYJ= �i�il ./. wpW.i Wi••'ix•°a••..znfa °Ji��.2,ri f.` -.,..z :. J. =,w,t i��swL r --w.z. v " •z,: 1 '• r'.Yf�'1P."7'".J"F?ti",j.s. =! '. 9J {�. :1 .� •:I �- '=_�- ---�-_- y---•^` _ .,- a- ....�P ), _ Or' PPON• MawMflltr. MO•/• i• nlPlwmlO•• r'/ Y. •P- .OPO�M•'TO..gP�.TTpna•.epyr� •� wqf epP0000PPppf Yfff V A•PPMNPP.vpfa,.Ofy,Oa N••f•.'ti,NM'•.`f•Nf••V•q.•f• /YW p000gf0^VO^'U�^)V^OOOOPOOOppw OOVO°pOM4 ^AI°w�Or°.pp VOM°°�1°.w° ri '. 14VpOVOw00 °_ OppppOpOOOpp,...wyFFr.1. + nP,. •-•.Tw �r ai1L/ .• I.l�`� Qrvl.,ryryJy_ - -- _-�- 1� i : • o • • : • ' • • r _ • ' • � • o � n • a • • a • • f I v N s v r 2 U V ff f •J M NS�6V4 y W V e r Ta Ow•V SJ •t JJL •+pNV _ _ rNae W r . N) L —V I V .J= vaF r W/ .a "Z N� - -JQV OUaO O N Or r .14\pprV Z tMNZhf _a.VG..CWWie \_OLOWZi 6 W .NI•n.K 6\ t { CV a0�0.1 V•.SVZ= V: V4'/eN ZV• O. ZWr rx Z..HNOICWV,N V e r� a VVi.+.2fY leV {i. y.. W =re 2V,hOJ�fiJVW V m'SZW, °Z6G.P6 ON.•N» W QMf J`C IO J••inf NS9f JJ Y�fN s .�eo.r.msuc�o°OrL.wWWZWrWii o ."\— .i2.i"'11� z zwuvz -_W urJ r.wws. —.z.z •z w�zruoW Ns C,rLWSW�ZaKeO 1' +..,A_PrW L{ v2eLZ7�r r<CYIr :.1{ =T•Z t.VOV••J eZZ WVU�JZe 3JeV�•JYWVJt {� {� �u.:._�W,..•e.f...lw.- o..3:w'r e�wr.w s..f...Ww. Jcu SSssasfef m {{ { {f{{v.nw•N �•..°.�°..� ealsi } :..ln -N :NW roo.. n. �oonPNww..,r�P^erow+u�^POOnwe�.e Pr� ee.wnW°psoro r i �iurh`.•h.�.r'r°.° eweoe+.i..Pw,ea�P` _..P�.rP�R' e.�.�`ep Po i .NP• VOA• rawiwepO ..y.Iy1.Oh{pO— •/a.PPhePeM MP•bPerl�nlN P' �[ ppP a epp O0VU100 +r•..�rw.MiMIy1NyNMV.1 w�MN..1. =.. j1 WROO.•+•rrrr+_rrrrrw•�r r Y Mh hrh�hhnMhMhMM1MMrhhn MyMhM•I•I•h M^ rrw�.rrr•rrrr r.. r_ hhr _ww A —• a • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • i1 • I, o ov a+ oo�o..:'sn °cooaooa `.. .. eo°.............eo o °e a r mre�a ryoo:r n m .wio.+ew in.°pw��o� w z P. w �'�+ N•'P w Iw +. oao�o° rw• 'v •�I+ o o m •' I 1 I I A I i s 2 I 1 W e I { I 1 1 Y N eec °eV w.eP{ o°pprua ... w...... er o.cvMNerPW��� yO pPPP_Or= rrVPVppppr =ry PPS— POOPp�rP p.P�P yp y ^p= PPP�OPpPP_PM��POp i 1 � I 0 i 1 1 I �r •` O M n p� O n N .` m O C r) •O O O N N V1 O O u7 O •p Q N N n O N M u v �O Y O N � J 11 O M 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I h H N ^ p u w � Z c Y C W O •V C VI � � � •� 1 U V _7 7 O V UU U U •L •> G y ^ U U y ` u L R L N ' N W N i N N u W W W q� yl W Y U O = t a U V U� y O L °-I C G ^ L '- e n G o o n a° nn p � c a c u u c u u u o u 1- a� u z u u u° • Y U J T 4 a N O J 6 O tttY S N C V Y Y~ cc o c 7 0 •N O Y 6 a V 10 U r O. � u O � •O U O 9 N y� W q O m N t S t U U U 9 L J N _ C u C V V V u n U 1 u C u 1- n n-- i n n n n m m_ W m - -- - J _U 1L N N N N N N N ry N ry ry y rA \ \ \ \ \ = \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ _ 4i t' 1 re t Alft H. i I I -cnw_` f Yr IMJr w,Mr «n.n Ofw aJI ra[p :. =z APPUCATION IOR MCONOUC SNIRAGI U"104SI 1 "IS) Dr UQNSt(SI _ R[ctvT p Li,.t�_ I« d9anwr N A4.Wn I...�rl. Cwd Irol I,w..[ Dm rkan eino Su,«.wr. Cdl 95410 m DltL: 2= 4 VL7E c OG."W kI dr. TN w «ro..e A «- er.PPHr Ill T..r r «..r : NAwI» d AIIl14NlW APdr .ne.r'rASzu ❑ '. Flrtoao C. 4 Y DE TOL"I0, 1�Sn:e1 [9 «•.r Gx.. 1 � � d.o... o..., nr[(U a TAANUCMG SI' IN ..,� M Dou I =00 41 ,. .. - .• AauA1 Foe 104.00 in •ROCa '.1 TxYan J Mwrr- II+�Lr. w 5nrn - '., a .its•• "U.•'41 PoG[h111 al1W. ,e t _ Rat5Q:i3 r:CC :.(,0 91730 E= :n- o I.Tu [ 40440 . A ue.- ...4...r.d 47/30 - 115733 5 i�yi «�`• Tan t.M�Uiy AddruW dRr•.rl.w 51- NU.Nr a.A Snrw I . it .. �xllr.rlrr...r _ .(T-, ".I IN p..1..n.1 dr AY.A.[a ` C.r AA « rp.b0... .1 dr d9enr•.Y pr 11 ITII•�^ . YIS'.nw« N titi 9 r 10 w w an«tiw.I .All. dell e.Ir.M p..l.At.pP4.t.n . �.L �� _ 12 •ONM W_ M IM ..I +wprr ..Wrrd 4 M dr 4.•..d P•^r.r N bn .. M ywfT .h.. .1 . 9...tw, w A) �Nr N Nr_ar wNy w rwtr « w...r ro M.J.M rr r1 rN pNw..n M M •hrAW M.re9. Cnrr.l M IL SrAT[ G u(IrorNIA Ce.+p 0 Cm !L mitt 1ne p,.r 121-- /E2 t �� ,mow .���• �...�y � .......«.... .p�M ✓r.r.. ri.......r�..rr M rnr�•.r �Y.rw��.rw� +.. MI I � . w h,..« rr �.� � . •./b+r F Y yfr � w. �. ry+.My Ww yy le` Arnrt"T'I HGN V[ .• <' %..1:r1 ^ak�t APPLICATION BY TRANSr[ROR I 5 EGII °I uulacwA Cwnrl a .,y..... �� r.•w . w W. m r r .r.• r — wIr«• y wwr ,J.r,y.Nrr r..a•nl�. ".rah �.Y I le Ibw41 .1[rrwMJ 1l •rrw.4l Mlb.,r.fr. N L'u«.IAren[a I _ - � `1 °IalDlulat7(2splgl��? 191 «w+ rMe.reM 4n.n CM.•4 LP [d• C•.^H •� �,• Oe Ne,IVrd AIbe. TA4 Gal Fell llr,h,l.,.I Ur OJP [.r.wA.I}�M - _ <.i IMd rI ••••S r .O4rw� �"I_ c •IwYp�[yI.S'�r` - r Llthif1 L.y����:i�6i.4.>u�C-4./. •'S�bSI����l1C+Fr�yh- rriaVS.vj i F _ — — -- — — — - FOa4oLL 'RLua — -- — — - -- AfA6u, I LA L»n9 4n WA MILL i C Lk TA<_iA AiLL IS Locnren a u - e Snu Sipe of FOC7-AILL i3LuD Susrwesr �F e ixtrell z6cTiW of Foo -fhiLL AAuD 5M 3eQtiRl2AAID AD PrpD t}a7ACecJ7 fio 'L% li AbiC LAnP'tesrnuoriAir i'11C FMP? CuQ2eAf—ILY to.eD ft.siv eor nofeA —i iEs - Zo,ucra C -2 )L1o2Ti1 — if -Z EAs71- — C -Z Sad — 2 -3 w csr - C -2 G,eoc&L 2M 00 Commel2clA( Gem a4t 2P.O ZI- Th!elar *�PmDAP ngs 0 0 Ajo2r//le6 Ilse ill(- L'itST,JC'a��etu�L Soil, �i /�eSiDP.UriAG we Sr / CB7t7/l1C/ &A( Mi -Lti =rvry afc• 7 A7 i .•r NG• f{`r es r, z - av- a copy.. /wx. -. w. M•.,dx ' � .r NY rtMrny..lYr Uryx N.Mx.nxr.4. 0..y APHICAaON FOR AICOHOOC AIr1.Aa1 I.CIMS1j31 1• STNISI 01 ucW11 SI IOt IN C« MO.w..rH .I A4dss M «ep. Wed HUnt N S" B xr -direr Ila>a.w.we• 02 A%LZ DLTJI i YIRx •\ 1 •, - CKI 9311f 610au rx..... x..... w..».. BATIPO /ucC cool IM Nrra pa.d Ax.11 eyP[.r f« DaN 4,.N • Amur d.unbNwlWn. APPCN eNN !w Iad ] NIMCISI or AMIGN451 I., h+ry CA47CLR, tR"-. 0.... >YCAaTZLAB IN41. Poulin. 11iH131 OF ItAlAAcw'r 1 Ill tK nH >:►alutsl{YSaitli7tFt 8171 11 100.00 4 AKW" 104.00 _ Cr 31 ` i 1 rwf WwLul. - - CITY OF OflANCHO CUCANONGA - lt «.4.dpn . w.-- Hx.c...M w.w AUiNISfRATtOi/ . �• 9170^0k xoothAll Blvd. i —SAN ..-' • IGZC$I CGO -1.00T 91710 acBM"Aas Lro 718.9,Y11 IF11AW 1'}�IIO Sf0f.00, ` i *4 I i e w 4 la I, - 3,,tnrwr...x .. rye. r cn.IYSn1 x�• I 4�bCp Addrwr f•1 dlr.ru Irwn H- H.•L.• er Lw, S O � r IF .tn.n..rn t0 W.. ,.a .w. ,(N,Nd «ry N M pwMm I M d4N•a[. yl' . !) 11 .• . .:Fr :-� M«.0 C« w M r r.y.lpF I W,.-, ryn` /V '/ Isn+pbM4,1 �/ r `Ih Lylw.9l3-emw Nwr9a 10 enwene.Mw .bAL yallMlnwJ qn NlM ayp4+eEen • -(• IS Apda.x .yra.r (.1 I+e� a•1a•r wvr•..Wf.A n e. wM 4xvd I.-_ NI Mn ee 0e a.eS+.wr I k.u.e. eN AI+M N.JI sr.ge4 «raw«Vr.s+bM wNrM 11 NrMpe..yn,NA. A4e41.rNm.p.CWNA0 s,a a.rrardlco 0/1 � IF SrA't a cundNU C..-y N =-=z T r r. Z== = Sw .... xn.xrr r r .-.w. iP+�.. w.xr..x• +�.r r.r. �.r++. nw ,r ii.r.n.rr ww nr.A. `M.+ « 4 w.•rr� I,hr, AmKANr% 1 .y.Sr•� qrl i- iO Y y; n. -•- rC .��irQ �d % �i�r' vid.[il%.j_`�.,•.:'I.L'«Zt� 4 APPLICATION BY TRANSrIROR ` I S STAFF CI GtIIO.bA Cwary N v . .,•..- .,, OaN y..,j. ti. , � rµ�!� 1 .raw^ ♦_� � i =.. -.' �:.....�x - +.::.rr..... .. N. n .�... x...r r ..... x...w w..:... wr_... I 16 NarM1l dtu+.NU IF 1. q'j dl4n.nlu T 1! l4ww Nr3.1,1 co -dxyc. C" Oe rY. WrO. 11A.s TAt.li. +rs b"'.rw V. oat ArorMd [I e..dN..nrr. "Qr �s=r<;; »;I.w `..Ya : "�" ''•{ '�ow.,RLW I i v� H1L �I aC ✓Amur 0 utut I _ ---- ____ -- FiartlfLLT?L0D—--- _ - - - -- YU LLD D&A3 I u i s 15 ICCATIfD DA) -7o;iP iL6ent zoe_ i CcP.juL cP rcoT14fLL *ZLv7 ifA-)D L/OAJ 4-7';gee7- !A„TNiAj -de MUSIr- 'PLUS r?Ln:ZA. �7vb5FC f n�[zf`? CaUe4IrLY' z` llt t (f -2 C- 7e4VML YL44 o �'ammcec�gL fiAsftPlJr'PaoPeerrfL Cae.&ttrL' 2onxj 0 0 1✓c�LTfF � 3 EPSr / C -2 Saute /,'1 -3 cas r / C� ,(/ern✓ Ensr /CommmcgC 5,,&7;' /PEs rexnAC r1z�2bs /nom Imes,- 1(f:*vweecw1- 0 .I E El H J. CITY OF FANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAI FF REPORT DATE: January 19, 1983 6� TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Alta Loma Channel Assessment District Consultants Contracts Attached for Council approval is the consultant contract with Don Owen and Assnciates as Assessment Engineer and Brown and Nazarek as Bond Counsel for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District. The consultants were designated in the property owne ^s petition and complete the agreements for services on this District. Mr. Owen's agreement may be terminated with completion of property owners meeting for a fee of 59,000. Full processing through the District formation hearing is fixed at $25,000. Upon successful sale of bonds, an additional $17,000 charge would be incurred in bond sate for financial consulting. Mr Browns proporal can be terminated at anytime .0th charges not to exceed $12,500. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the consultants contracts 0th Don Owen and Associates and Brown and Na,rarek to act as consultants to Assessment District 82 -2 anJ authorize the funding from the Drainage Fee fund. �Agectfully Xubmitted, Lg /7aa 111 ac time nt no - •A C c 6t • SPECIAL COUNSEL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEHENT Is hod, AM entered Into this day of 198 by W between the CITY OF RANCRU"iOG.4DNGA, a pew Ic corporaEion (hereinafter raterred to as -City'), end BROIpk Z HAMNER, Attorneys at Law, (hereinafter referred to as •Counsel•) NOW. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto at follows: SECTION 1 That Counsel shall perform legal services In connection with the we. posed astessment proceedings AM bona Issuance In the utter of A pruposed special assessmnt district known and designated as ASSESS ENT DISTRICT NO. 82.2 (ALTA LOEIA FLOM CONTROL EMNNfL (Wassailer referred to as thn 'Assessment Olstrlct•) under proceed. rps conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 'Hunle$;al leprort. unt Act of 1917', being Division in .• the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California Said services shall include: A. Review of the dedication and accuisitlon of the streets ant ease- ments Or other preperly in which proposed work is to he performed; B. Examination of the plans and sieclfiutions for the proposed work, the boundary map and assessment diagrss of the Assessmert Dist. rict, the astessment roll and bonds. oat the gi,lnq of Instructions and advice in connection with tee foregoing: C pecoeeondaticns a, t0 Posed , schedules and aelluns that should be conducted ant taken; 0. A•:rarallon of all resolution%, Notices, contracts, bond (ores, AM other papers AM docmwerts required In the prucecdings: E. Examinatioa of the proceedings, step by step, as taken: F Appear at al l heulnot und,.r the Proceedings, and attend any meet- ing wnere attendance Is requested; G. Hake recorundation% n to sale Of hells. If deolredt H. perform legal services, if required, pursuant to 4e provisions of thO •Specirl Asteesv"L Investlgetlun, Linitatlan AM Majority Protest Act of 1911', bel" Division a of tNe Streets and Highway, Code o. the State of California; I Issuance of In inqualificd legal mint" attestlho to the validity of the proceedings and the issuance er the bonds Such legal services that? not Include any services In connection with the acculeltlon, by easement or Condevnation, of any taseeents or r other Interest in real Properly necessary for the proposed laprove. "Ms These services an he provided by Counsel, by seoarala aaree- moot, if desired by City. 1 ,r i� .t C W SECTION 2. That the Clt/ shall carfare as follow: A. furnish to Counsel such reps, records, title searches, and othr, documents and proctedl s, or certified coin thereof, as nay be reasonably require, oy1ounsel In the parfarwnce of the servltes hereunder; B Pay to Counsel a fee cm0uted on the c04firsed asse0taent as follousa Teo PERCENT 2S on the first $500,000: ONE PERCENT iS� free 5500,001 to 52,000,000: OM -W1tF PERCENT ( 5051 on the balance thereof C Paywnt of the Novo - referenced fee shall be as follow: All dw and payable upon recelpt of money frw the sale and doli- vary of bands to the successful unic leer SECTION 5. In the event the proceed has tee terelnated or abandoned prior to cmistlon. Counsel shall to Paid a reasonable fee for serethes ren. dared tc date based on an hourly rate of $90.00 per hi not N eaceed 512.500.00. SECTION a, That this Agreeeant my be terelnated by either party hereto by aall- ing written native thereof to the other party. IN NITNtSS IPIEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreeeent to be eeecuted on the day IM ycar first horelnabove wrltten ATTEST: rITrE[FRe- CITY OF RAbl iO MAMMA STATE OF C4IFONNIA R 10 -CITY - CITY CF RANCHO COCANONSA CITY OF RAhCNO CWMOSLA STATE OF CALIFORNIA APP -C. TOM TO f0..5 app wlai.ISa lmO R43u WTL i 7 'OWNS iROeN C� ARje.�-l� /� ly: F- -I OMMACP MR PFCF SSMAL MMC-q Tnis agrcu=t rrade this _ day of , 1982, by and between the CITY OF PAMM WMEMA (hereinafter called the 'City ") and DON C;PiN & ASSOCIATES, 2061 OWiness Center DTivo, Suits 203, Irvine, California, 92715, a corporation ((hereinafter called "Consultant ") - W I T H E S S E T H: VnMMAS, the City solicited proposals for professional services related to their proposed Assesvmnt District No. 82 -2, Alta Loma Flood Control Channel, oil Consultant, )yf letter dated Novenber 22, 1982, srb- mitted a proposal; WIXTEAS, tlw CSC/ has reviewed said proposal and ti;ds it accept- able to meet the need, of the City; tdmREAs, the city has, in its possession, a petition signed by over 60: of the larr]oarrs by area from within the p;wjected benefited area of said public cork and it is denied that a debt report is not rendrcd for the project; =1, Tl¢RFiiDRE, IT /S EIlIlIlALLY A ^fY.E) AS FOLLU•Ga, TO WIT: A. The City hereby carploya the Cesv:ultant and the Consultant herey/ accepts such e:TlcYnent to perform the services as generally described in the proposal of .,)verbs 32, 1982, Attachimmt A hereto. O D. The Con-ultant 5M.'l be am indcpanamt contractor and not an enployec nor shall any of Consultant's aK loyces, agents, or nvbcentractors be cnla /ed by the City. c � • ,h C. The Consultant shall perform in a diligent rancor the follow- ` in7 cervix all available financial 1, Assemble, rev�ct+, and awlyu% englln°eLi^9, legal, and ewnrmio data and icfa-aation wfiich raY have a bearing on the program for the fir=win 7 Of the Al" Lora Flood Control Channel. icipate 2. prepare a preliminary spread of assessments and part in workshop Program as delimited in items 1. through 6. Y: Attachrent A. 2 prepare a Prclimina eng 'ers report o:I the spread of 1 omcrs within the benefitod area and ine t assessments among Property 0 a-d 16 as set oonduct those Stets as set forth botMvcn items forth in Attackrnant A. activities as 4. Assist in the sale of a" bonds and other generally set forth in itccs 18. through 25• in Attach=t A. M this contract shall 1.4 Paid ye, for servic ss perfozxd under nonthly by the City upon receipr of an invoice by tF� Consultant based upon the fee &Ajulo in the Attaclarnt A. :he fee fir tine uork =durtod pursuvnt to _tees Y through S. of Attach:gen ro t A will t w=,d $9,000 and the Consult `'du not to proceed from �yOnd this poitt without written instructions prOCe`:d the City. _2 Z &I C � Upon rocv£pt of written instructions to proceed on the second 1 phase, itcre 9. through 18. of the Attachment A, the City will pay as per the attached fee schedule =nthly upon the rocoipt of the invoice. re total amount not to exceed $16,000 for tho second phaso of work. The Consultant my proceed on the third phase, of work in the interest of achic, L•g the proposed echdule but will rot bo entitled to camansation until such time, as notice to proceed on the sale of bonds is presented by the City. (Such notice to be constituted by confir=tion of the aesas==t at the public heari.;xl.) Papmt for services related to the bozl Bala will be provided fran imnics included in the bond issue at the tbm of bond closinq and such amount will be f!-<W at $17,000. 7te m3iling acy -ess of the City is as follars: Cr7Y OF RX=0 C- X*A'aXA 9320 C Baseline Poad Post Office Pox 807 Ranch-3 cucmaonga, California 91730 The wiling �midress of the Consultant is as follows: DON MEN L ASSOCLNT S 2061 Business Center Drive, Suite 203 Irvine, California 92715 IN VarAMS %%IM N, said City has caused this contract to he executed and attested by its proper offices duly autJ•orizd and the Consultant -3- 13 C � • has caused this cont=act to be a =tcd by are of its officers as of e".e date hereinafter set forth. APi l iN T.• I J.la If l u r "CITY" CITY OF RM(XO CUCAYI % DY Attest: "CCNSO Mllr" D0.V U, 6 IATiS '� • »ate ) y • <]Do�> DON OWEN & AS-S 'iCIATE6 INC. 1:ovarl,er 22, 1982 City or Rancho cicatonga 9320 C OaselSre Road Lost Office Box 807 Pancho Cuca- MOnga, California 91730 Attention: Lloyd Ilubbs, city Fngincer centlamn; 9110 purpose of this letter in to propose the basis of a service agrcrmxnl• for your forthcaning Assessment District No. 82 -2, the Alta 7tma Flood Control fortha1. The proposal is for assessrent engircorirg work for the proposed project and includes fat Your option) the sale of bonds for that project. Fran previous cork already acw�. Listed on Lae Project in treetirgs with larda Hers and vio preliminary structurin; Of the proposed assoss:ent district, it is apparent that a problem e-:ists to several ssall lardamars, t1tre0 to five acres in size, wha at present have one house on the prcp=, and do not intend to subdivide. An ir;, rtant part of tho proposoi Progr.m is an cctetsive workshop program •4hich Could hopefully result in a method of assess,nnts for Ube project e.!tich would mitigate adverse insets upon these sauller proparty cr -Mrs. SCd®UU: OF 715:5 i YD -L"-Jr— OF 1"M PMFOSiD The attached Asccs==t EngL^.oer's Schdalo has been prepared to present a basis for this proposal. At this point, both bond co•.:.•sel ani tho design eng: ccr rava not had an o=e.=tttnity to datcrnino that tha proaopd sc!=ulc will in fact t.orh.. Ther0forc, subscquant ehan.:a tO the sch dule ray to rc ,sired s Ord,= to acc— r.c,,ato t! - scl•.edacs and availability of oth- coraulta^.ts on the project. 11a proposal Ipuvcr, set forth what to uelieve to tae an 11 all scl:edulo from the etvdpoint of Utp assns- =t engiru and bend sales. On the sd :edulo, yon will r&c a nurbcx in parr- ithcnes assoaiatd with each event or ti'e schkxlule w:iich represents tl:.c hours of effort tlurh is anticicatd in that task or cvra. Itc.:- 2 8 corztituto a to Project- progrcuins:•9 designed to solve thin alrmey noted proaicn'on the pr iro rcutira assess - itam•, with the cxc PLiO:L7 of 17, 20, 21, and 25, mint engil :�rir.9 tas4s. Y.:e excepted itcrs are Uase tasks which arc related to Ua sale of U:e proposed bong. A7TAC*II.YI' A I "7 c c city of rare» Cuca.-onga Attention: Lloyd lJL:bbs, City Fngirce hbvmb r 22, 1902 Pago Tro In sumt:ry, the enalsyis indicates that appro ltmtoly 97 hours would W royuirod for the worhihop p:ogran, 145 lours for the non. al n^,sc:;=rnt work, and the bond sale would involve 11G hours. PMI'OSFD CYYTS Vb propose to acearplish the assesm=.t work.. on a fixed fro basis for tho total job of $25,000 with payaent monthly upon receipt of an invoice. If tl•o City does not elect to hire a ceparato mmieipal financial consultants to sell the bonds, $17,000 olmm be added to the acsecsrent engineer's fee of $25,000. If the City chooses to = dify U's progr.tn over that awrantly contamletod, adjustrrcats (either up for extra work or do..a for pork which covid be depleted or possibly ac ---7p- liehcd by t10 City) would be on the basis of tl-.o attached fee schedule. In case o. abx irmnt of Em p:cgrsn, two potential a'ba dc^rnt dates have bxn mrsidsrod Ttw f�: st which should bo considered would corur on ahcut %arch 15 at tea conclusion of the final worl•.shcp. At that tin: we shw;ild be able to d:•termino if sufficient protest will exist in order to inpai do ,ucessfrl arrpleticn of tho progran. The ahL-e_ .,,-%t cost at that tiro for as:;css; it engineering work would be $9,000. A Second potential aba domm date would be upon concivaion of the protest hearim, on Juno 30. The ahm.1omrnt cost, as of that date, would be $25,000. The abrjo outline of costs inclr:o salary and uaterial costs includ- ing print: g of the eMircer's report. Nor included in thcze fig-urce =a Wrcd aril official statc:rnt printing costs and /or the pr/sical pc ^ti.:g of t10 project arc. inelu2cd in it= 14. Physical posting has been consid--red to W acccr-alishod bf the City staff nt the ap—pTopriatc ti.,c. Stt•: c e 7I ty % S< X 4 ty m or VI • Iq 1+ 't � O ?�.' " U N M; fil & jq 94 �•�t� � p� , .Vi �titt .� �� Fi R to u 1 1 (In f4 I.li a 1 y ih V 17 M I.i Tj ..• �I U .C1 ✓ M � Cl , dus A M M v Y1 b 1: N• c N N N N I•-n 7 1 c I X X AI► X % - �I M1 �I �l 0 Al l F]I �' CL i $ r R V u 1 rl {I MMS�r E4 f, Dt)N OL•VEN «ASSOCIA -1 �S INC. �vn�j. FEE SCl1DDULi mourly $90.00 Rates — Lxngdon l9. O•aen -- y,.mencc G. Rolapp . . . . . . . . . . $00.00 — Prank Gebrke . . . . . . . . . . . . . $50.00 — Lawrence H. Purton . . . . . . . . . . $50.00 expenses Transportation outside of Southern California will be charged at actual cost. Other costs are included in the hourly rate. 1 l CLAIM FOR DAMAGE OR INJURY Cu.. Oa4 lVu .1µm I. Claims for death , injury to person, or to personal property crust be filed not later t4on 100 days offer the occurrence (Gov. Cafe, Sec. 911 2). Claims for domapes to real property must be filed not later than I year after the occurrence (Gov Code, Sec. 911 2). TO: CITY OF'Iz� a r Je 1 1 esAl 4a 70� Aver170+(ps•r eJ176/ 7/Y 989 -77- Name of C oimont Address Zip lisone age r Address to which Claimant wishes roticas sent. • WHEN dict � nor Injury occur? /•Qs /sA 8�2— e n I WHERE did T�omogo or injury occur? :k A ye : S q Aoye HOW and under what circumstances did omog or Injury occur? _CQ,,s J: ('mot ss3 a�•�'YPP �Tarf %1Q, r�rr vn ls - Vtt id v < /v'n i�r /•Hp �P�1r7' YPPgr -><d Wu.slr �i•n •P tit.fr P�.� Yt Y ` _. �iir Sarvrr� -�-s rrsr�w,.,r•r. __ ___ _ H 4T particular action by the City, or Its employees, caused the alleged damage nr ir'uV? (Include names of employes, If known) 'll // // CITY OF RAh'Ch0 CUCA610NGA �r 7 rs.wt A rte\ •- "'e-P l v. \ -n vsc ,N,1.0 ADMINISTRATION Insofar..tc f maJf RR WHAT sum do you claim? Includo the estimated amount of any prospecttvo loss, Insofar qs f muy d tiowr at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the Bost• of romput,tion of th8 amount claimed: (Attach estimates a bills, If possible) seryrre -4 "S4irt Wbjltr nc yfte $ / Q % � f Total Amount Clolmad: ° $ / U 0 � NViES and addresses of witnesses, Doctors and Hospitals: V �J`�+r \ P / — �M i✓r Mnr,�lsll �CC1 (.C,cr YELOW MR nuxo fit ANDERSON TAVEa s REEVER � y � ATfORNt.. AT LAW �J 135, raer.0 .12 j .a.. wur aw.cv. m..mr.. VCSN.a ..a.. CITY 0) RANCHO CUCA6IDNGA 3 nw sa.ou ADMINISTRATION . DEC 2 ' 1 Ali Fr dtnan.r.r.r_ Claimants 778 d B ;9t�llllL,!.2i$1Q1518 fi 6 � 7 N 8 CLAIM AGAINST PUBLIC ENTITY 9 10 111 EDWARD J CROFT and ELEANOR CROFT, ) CLAW rOR DAMAGES ) COVEANMENT CODE SECTION 910 12 Claimants, ) and 911 2 13 I vs ) 14 ) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ) + . 15 Defendants. ) lv. ) ]" TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: ti 18' 3 „s 19 'iOU ARE HEREBY NO'.FI ;D pursuant Co Government Code 20 Section 910 am 911 2, that the above -na^ed claimants, EDWARD J 21 LROFT and ELEANOR CROFT, whose address is 5980 Sunstone, Alta 1, 22 Luma, Califorrta 9,701, claims that their real priprrty located 21 t 7980 Sunstone, situate within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, her 24 hcon damaged by the improper, wrong:u] and negligent acts of the 2S CLty of Rancho Cucamonga 26 This claim is based on the acts of the City of Rancho ] 27 Cucamonga in allowing Mr and Mrs Charles Taylor to alter the (.LA...- d< 20 slope ratio and rero•.e the one (L) foot beam which existed ry V 1 !between the CROFTS' property and that of the T)ars a�y,,l,.orrs' Both 2, the grading slope ratio and Lhe one (1) foot be were required 0 3! as part of the grading plan for the housing project of which the I 4i Croft /Taylor properties are part F! On or about lane 8, 1982, th,. j..feauar,-, CITY OF 6 R4NCU0 CUCAMONGA informed claimants that they would not `Rke t an action against Mr and Mrs Iaylor in regard to their o al•eration of the slope or make any attempt to compel the Taylors 0 to reconstruct the altered slope and beam 10 Therefore, as a result of defendants' action, claimants I 11� have suftercd loss of ise of their property, and other damages 12 as to the value of their property in the approximate sum, to 13 date, of $25,u00 00 141 All notices o other rommunlcations with regard to thisgib, 13, claim should he sent to claimants at ANDERSON, TAVES & REEVER, 16 Attorney, at LP-4, Post Office Bon 1357, 1355 Nest Foothill 17 Br•urevard, Suite ., Upland, California 9178E 1D ]J Dated cJ , 21. 22 i 23 21 25 26 27 ' 26 .I .OnIION T.VCs ywfau ft Vw ffel Ki Mfl..f ' M. /MnIK MfL II bec•emtcr 21, 1982 ANDERSON, TAVES & REEVER 7: cv JOH [orne- r Cla'manCs • RESOLUTION NO. 83-4 )/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAUCHC CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCU'OINTS WHICH ARE HO LONGER R.- .CUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDL'H GOVERIMENT CODE SECTION 34090. WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain City reeoMs under the charge of tha following City departments are no longer required for public or private purposes: Administration Department City Clark's Department. WHERPAS, it ties been detarminod that destruction of the above - wntioned matorials is necessary to conserve storage space, and reduce staff timo, expense, and comLSion in handtirg, and inforc t the public, and WHEREAS, Section 3VO90 of the Government Code of the State of California authorizes the heal of a City department to destroy any City records and documents which are over two years old under his or her chargo, without raking a copy thereof, after the name are no longer required. upon Cho approval of the City Council by resolution and the written consent of its City Attorney; end WHERE/S, it is therefore desirable to destroy said records as listed In Exhibit -A" attached hereto and redo a part hereof, in ator.,ge, without making a copy thoraof, which are Over two years old; and WHEREAS, said records have bean approved for destruutlon by the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCI;O Cil=!O* - -A DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1 That approval ,nd authorization is hereby giv^o to destroy those records described as Exhibit 'Ae attzchod hereto and mda a part hereof. SECTION 2 That the C ,.y Clerk is authorized to allow m=instlon by and donation to the Department of Special Colloctions or tnu Ur.iveralty Research Library, University of California, or other houtor cal society designated by the City Counci , any of the records describ.,d it Exhibit -Ae attached hereto and Dade a part hereof, axcept those dtemed to be confidential. SECTION 3 That the City Clerk shall certify to the adcptlon of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be l,- full force an! effect. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this a day of e, 1983. AYES: a NOES: a AESENT: a a 3 Resolution No. 83- Page 2 FILE 110. 0203 -06 0203 -07 0407 -29 0401 -30 0402 -01 0405 -01 0405••01 -4463 0405 -01 -4693 0405 -01 -6360 0405 -01 -9224 0405 -01 -9226 0405 -01 -9245 0bJ5 -01 -9254 0405 -01 -9255 0405 -01 -9260 0405 -01 -9295 0405 -01 -9302 0405 -01 -9313 0405 -01 -9314 0405 -01 -9315 0405 -01 -9320 0405 -01 -9321 0405 -01 -9322 0405 -01 -9350 F EXHIBIT "A" CONTENTS City Manager Weekly Reports - 1978- 0�tober 1980 Appeal - 1978 -1979 Business License Corrospondence - 1978 -1979 Bail -Out Correspondrmco - 1978 - October 1980 Bike License ' rwiapondence - 1979- Januar7 1980 Improvement Agreements Parcel Yap 4463 - Robert McDonald - January 1980 Parcel Nap 4693 - Vanguard - November 1979 Tract 6040 - Oriffic Development - Nsy 198C Tract 9'24 - C ;D Development - May 1980 Tract 9226 - Walton Assoc. Companies - May 1980 Traot 9245 - LvdIt Homes - May 1980 .Tract 9254 - Valtoo /Lundstrom - Alta Loma - May 1980 .raot 9255 - Lusk/Walton Cucamcngai, A Partnership Fay 1980 Tract 9260 - Thompson b Assoc. - May 1980 Tract 9295 - Socaland Corp. - Fay 1980 Tract 9302 - Vanguard - May 1960 Tract 9313 - Socaland Corp. - May 1980 Tract 9314 - Lusk/Walton Cucamonga - Nay 1980 Tract 9315 - Lusk/Walton Cucamonga - May 1980 Tract 9320 - Lewis Homes - Nay 1980 Tract 9311 - Crowell /Leventhal - ?by 1980 Tract 9322 - Lewis Homes - may 1980 Tract 9350 - Yellow Brick Rd., Ltd - Fay 1960 A q Resolution No. 83- Page 3 0405 -01- 9352 -1 0405 -01 -9355 Tract 9352.1 - Inco 17ous, Inc. - Hay 1980, 0405 - 01_9397 Tract 9355 - R L. Slavers d Son - Hay 1980 040541-9399 ' Tract 9397 - Crovoll Leventhal - June 1980 Og05 -01 -9401 Tract 9399 - Stan Proud, Comtruetech - May 1980 0405 -0 t_gypg Tract 9401 - Olympus Paolflo Corp, - Jur.e 1980 Tract 9409 _ Coral Investment - June 198o 0405 »01_9421 Treat 9421 - Nubank Intornatloail 0405 -01 -9424 - June 1980 0405 -01 -9429 Tract 9424 _ Alta Los, 18 Inc, _ June 1980 0405- 01 -9449 Tract 9429 - Valle Verde Ltd. _ Juno 1980 0405 -01 -9450 Tract 9449 _ Thompson A Assoc. - June 1980 Tram 9450 - Inoo Hones - June 1980 0405 -01-9451 • 0405 -01 -9475 Tract 9451 - Royal Oaks Roma - June 1980 Tract S - J, Mthony /Rarch CA Homes 1980 ins _ June 0405-01-9569 Tract 9569 - pin Lee Construotlon 0405 -01 -9586 _ June 1980 Tract 9586 - Lewis Home - June 1980 0405 -0 1_9587 Tract 9597 - Levla H0.0 - June 1980 Otl05 -01 -9595 tract 9595 - Gary Miller - June 1980 Og05 -01 -9616 0 409 -0Y Tract 9616 - M, J, Brock A Sons - June 1980 0602_02 Alcoholle Beverage Appllcatlona - 1978 -1980 19'18 Agreements and Agreements Correspondence - 1977- 0602-02 California 4ison 197 197 7 -7978 Prauchlas Correspondence, - 0701 0701-03 LStigatlons (Beaver Building _ Langley 1979} Historical COmmleslon Reference Papers - 1978 - October 1980 ® 0701_03 i 1 Planning Ccmmisslon Reference papers - 1978- October 1980 h7, Resolution No. 83- Page 4 0701 -r3 Federal Leglslativc Information 8 Correspondence 1978- 1980 0701 -10 League of California Cities Nowletters - 1978 - .October 1980 0701 -11 Council/Mayor Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 0701 -14 Ordinance Reference Papers - 1978- Dotober 1980 0701 -16 Legislative Bulletins - 1978 - October 1980 0701 -16 Lcgis:vtive Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 0701 -16 State Legislative Information and Correspondence 1978 - October 1980 0704 -04 City Attorney Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 0704 -13 Juvenile Anti - Delinquent Programs - 1978 - October 1980 0704 -20 City Logo Correspondence - 1979 0807 -02 Signs Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 1150 -05 Humne Society Reference Papers - 1978 -1979 1180-02 Chmbcr of Co=erce Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 1180 -02 Community Relations Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 1180 -10 Complaints and Inquiries - 1978- 01tober 1980 1206 -02 Dial -a -Ride Reference Papers 1206 -73 Qr.trana - 1978 - October 1980 1301 -05 Crossing Guard Correspondence - 1978 - October 1980 1301 -07 Crlme Reports - 1978 - October 1980 1301 -09 Public Safety - 1978 - October 1980 1302 -09 Fireworks Colreapondence - 1978 - October 1980 1402 -03 Community Services and Centers - 1978 - October 1980 1402 -04 Cal Jam - 1978 -1979 1402 -06 Historical Conission Ref. Papers - 1978 -1979 IF Resolution No. 83- Page 1 1502 -02 League of California Cities - 1978- Ootober 1980 1503 -03 SARBAO - 1978- Ootober 1980 1503 -03 SCAG - 1978- 00tober 1980 1503 -03 SCAO - 1978- Ootober 1980 ft. .0 134 0. Oghvttbn e( tit vales. lu-,I olM bnrtl.• afrbd .feral: eeaaraetlea ,nen, ilea nTYirn�LIJrJ L Y with _meat im _4'> =. —1 I 1 q M1 the e.Clrm�al or the 1 14�the i Anim charm, wL(ton[ Ell; elnt� ��n '"tl In.fnrnq�n M1O boil, a el! 7 �r Tldt I1'r flrrrml �^oY Yr x J fl: KmlOU Joea Iwt ncllwr4e Ihr alley lle -me la no lnnAOr rbe�6G n) ItttvNa affectln l k+trutt:nn Of �� lb) Cw it reran. f IIUe to ml prOlkry or Ilen[ thoreom let 1fcIwNA rrynln A le hr kept Iry at.,.," (d) IltmrM In\ tnon (e) The minute., • • WOtO YCAM old. boom D, ommlbloR pa or mwlYlle. of the I fal4allre Thla "le, MAIL no, hod➢ or of . t•C• Ire mn.IrI1N p[ Ilmlflnb or glblif In nutMtll➢ OmrlJni In Ymtlolr Afugp�} far 1M1e de,trvttlon of atmmeny lanes. and w J R la any manatr Me fAeleadld by 8ta4)OTfi. e. la ae(wNan,, with 1b,, Jeen menH, lo. • 0 F01.11.) mnntluN therel. PrefrltreU, fm Am•nem•oL .uellltY(W bo (O! fl . "a, io NaR dl Yprml. UOlr�evman, al • CClnu •• ft, ulgtr IM mbyl•n bi_ C.Ilforn4 CuL R.• Yira otd I,1J rr••ro0 bn ir. r aril. �e n U f.rl th. p,.ull0rr 1I,,, j JuI ban IIOn f ryIOW. 1!U IMn 1 r0 >•M Ote In :nAta to Netp b4ilm. cr tall •flleq Rey1• r. Lmen 11N0) Iry l- fllDlr IN, 11\ Y yl Ut6 COOI•••et Orltlnrl, aural 41pY• rrtpry, day ,n.nl, 1 Oblanry . •r[•pllq. l IION In mbprren°I .",ae DY Mr".pp. 4tvpuu.. In IIY data, nt on i .r al a ,,b, - er Orn•nl i ilv .p%Orpl tf In• Ir[4Y ld tear 0 tl."I s, We W ro,la•e n . new. 1 [Y alley,• 1 1. In e.n.nl t \r UD• III np Me blab tpYla �nOl.utllOn p/ um \' 4nr10bm —In t q+ ) a0. e[ 4.0. • Ia, b Iya ". •pmllf plNt npa lnt Of OInK.b a >r IbM1 ppn M1la tabs. it \nY : IM • • la " fabiNnbn O( rrNnb an,J :yVt Y[ taa rd IUDUOna In Inb aKllpn 1. [IIY rWnrlL hlln appa.Mll M•a IM IIN 1..,na ur ept as a.1[mrW lue no mblueln[ r Y pOrm•a {n. 9 th• I[ Or l ll q -mp11W I.p,d. for abnlll purl aY ell. [—an th. r� <nl. > t.Y1Mr IY�Y{Irl rW�l.d) t K°ry• IIhW{ a1KWlannnt Orya�IKKI. I• Il OpFAItr.U.n, t%, plyll. IM KJ. nm DurDy. tM whkh a.Nrr�� [I Wub let 1p ablUM• m:i ar.1. an) n 11W al u..a.mlev m m1..Klryn 1. a.- .ImYeE lwe mRra... er OIMr r)) 1. ea. mVK a• maa.A� bblMa Inaeflrrlbr. Opa Alp O., e UnO btlltatr. th"I's e. addlll•.. by aM..dmael ,op? CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA uianyeurai• ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR HERMOSA r et NO.: 2 AVENUE AND HAMILTON STREET Date- -9- T0. L A wAINS[OTT t ASSOCIATES, INC 12400 RARTON RD , SUITE 290, GRANC TERRACE CA ng heir You are hereby reluested to comply with the following chances from the agreement for- engineering ser :•Ic.s I Additional Right of way Investigations per letter dated 3/28/86 2 Parcel Map Preparations per letter 4/4/86 151` CECR:AS 1N R E in Contract Pri'.e In Contract Price $3,322.00 $8;572 00 $11,894.o0 Ts TOTAL $11,894 00 J'JSTIFICATIOW Additlonal survey a title workings required to clear "right of way" for street widening Survey's performed In late 1090's to establish original street left a 66' wide unclaimed strip of ground along the east side of Hermosa whlcn oust be cleared by preparation of Parcel Hap The am it of the Contract will be (Meet: Q (Increased) by the sum of: Eleven Thou .d Elaht Hundred Ninety Four Dollars (S 11.894.06 The Lontrart Total including this and previous Change Orde•s will be: Thlrt Th Thousand Seven Hundred Fourty Four rer DO11 Er5 (S )Tjv.Op The Contract period provided for completion will be (Incretsed)(Decreased) (Unchanged) Days This document will became a s el hereto. ement to the Contract and all provisions wall apply Rao -sted: L /_,B� OIL u S. ty Engineer 7 •/^ ate v Acce ted• l�ri ng neer Approved: Mayor, ty o anc o Cucamonga Oate is ent dated: w e use as recor o, any annrs a or g na eng neer ng agreement dated; r.,,; � r C1TY OF MNCHO C11CAAfOtiGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 .U: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BT: Slane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Change Order 85 -057, Project No. 800 -84 -26 Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa Please find attached Contract Change Order No. 1 for the subject project and contract. The additional change order covers costs for additional survey and design required to complete the project plans, specifications and estimate. The change order amount 4s within the original 10% con.ingency provided by Council for this project on July 5, 1985. RE:OMHENbATION: It is recmaaended that Council approve the Contract Change Order No. 1 for Project No. 800- 84 -26, Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa to G.P.S. Consulting Civil Engineers in the amount of $1,160.00 bringing the total contract amount to $35,360 00. Such workings are being funded from Gas Tax Accowit 11- 4637 -8107 (C.O. 85 -067). Respectfully submitted, Y �y LBH F:Dc Attachments i. r •. 70 I •, CI7Y OF RANC110 CUCANONGA ENGINEERING SERVICES CONIRACT CHANGE ORDER HTRAC T FOR Order No.: 1 CO 85 -761 Project No. 800 -84 -86 Oate: 04 -16 -85 — Lemon Avenue from Archlbaldto Hermosa_ _ T0- G P.S. Consultino Civil Engineers Engineer You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the agreement for engineering services. See Attached Letter 0�5 R F• NCIF�IL R NC A5 in Contract Price In Contract Price I. Additional Survey to Coordinate CCHJ facilities $600.00 2. Design Revisions fur new curb'It(gnments S. - at Lemon /Archibald Intersection' $560.00 TOTAL $1.160.00 JUST IF C I See attached letter. Note the t tra workings remain within the contingency aruunt originally approved for this p,�jeet. The amount of the Contract Witt be .fAlltAdd.'..d) (Increased) by the sum of: One Thousand One Hundred Sixty _ Dollars ($ t,160.00 —�-- The Contract Total including th4s and previous Change Orders will Se: Thirt Five Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Dollars (5 35.3 0.00 The Contract period provided for completion will be t;ACtlddl Da y diiM`k1d001 (Unchanged) This document will become a sup 'e.:ent to the Contract and all provisions w4'1 apply hereto. Requested: L B. dDDt, City g near Accepted: iz 0 Enq nee Uate APPrmad: . Mayor, City of rancho Cucamonga Bate This fe tdatton w 11 be —used sed as •cord of any c.�anges to a or g ra engineering neer ng 4 Agreement datad: July 5, 1985 ., i Elk" V t 1 . P consulting civil engineers 17821 L 17th. Street Suits 205 Tustin, California 92660 (714) 832 -4707 Ap -il 7, 1986 Mr Blane Frandsen Senior Civil fngineer Enginearing Division Community Development Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: Proj ^ct ho. 800 -34.26 Lemon Avenue from Archibald to Hermosa Dear Blane: .his is our fee fr; providing additional services beyond the original scope of work ` r• _=�X_ 1 City changed curb alig.•aent at the intersection of Archibald and Lemon Survey to provide top of Cucamonge :ounty Hater District facility at the Alta Loma Channel, includirg ,Land -by 3. Cucamonga County Water District provided the wrong location for thei^ facility at the Alta Loma Channel. City provided survey to locate socond time. 4. Additional survey to locate improvements 3t London, constructed after start of this project. Tutal additional tea: Surveying S 600.00 Design 14 hrs @S40 /hr. _560.00 SI,Ilo.00 Should you hava any questions, please tali me. Sincerely, c 1 [c�6L ;ormar. r.. Spiel, .1 {F Executive Vice Pre ent NKS:lkb r 9 CITY OF RANCHO CI TCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 7, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engineer BY, Lucinda E. Hackett, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT. Approval of Agreement for Installation, of Public Improvement and Dedication between Ermal E. Osborne and Kathryn B. Osborne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street Frontage Improvements at 6795 Archibald Avenue The attached subject agreement between tiv3 City and Mr. and Mrs. Osborne provides for street improvements which include curbs, gutters, sidewalk and drive approach on theWborne'9 property fronting Lemon and Archibald Avenues. The Osbornes =have agreed to grant to the City a Roadway Easement to allow for the widening and improvement of the intersection at Lemon and Archibald Avenues in return for the construction of said improvements. said street improvements will be constructed in conjunctiaT with the City's Capital Improvement Project for the reconstruction of Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenua to Hermosa Avenue. RECOMMEADATIOM: It is recommended that Council adopt the attaches resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Ermal and Kathryn Osborne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Respectfully submitteedd, G LBlW.EH: be Attachments A , i I AGREEMENT FOR INSiALLATIGN OF PUBLIC It1PROYEMENT AND DEDIL%TION This Agreement is made and entered into this __day of 1586 by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as °CITY ") and Ermal E. Osborne and Kathryn B. Osborne, husband and wife, as joint tenants (here'na °ter referred to as "OWNER ") far the Install avo- of certain public improvements including, but not limitei to curbs, gutters drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along a Portion of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A. Recitals (i) CITY has prepared plan% and specifications for, and Prtsently contemplates the installation of, public improvements along Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue and along Archibald Avenue from Lemon Avenue to Banyan Street (the "Lemon- Archlbald Project" hereinafter In this Agreement). (ii) OWNER arns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assessors Parcel No. 201- 251 -20, fronting along both Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue, which property is within the limits rf "he Lemon- Archibald Project. } (111) OWNER desires to participate to the Lemon- rchibald Project so }s �.F to dedicate necessary rights -of -way related to street 'ventage improvements alor.O its eroperty at Lemon Avenue and Archibald Avenue ('the Osborne Portion' .• v 0 E 5 This conrryante Is in trust, ho.ev,r, for the nurposef describe] above I 6 how, therefore If the Ueveloper shall failnfully Perform all of the aces aid things by the, to be done under this Agreement, then this canveyance shall oe We, other.lse, It shall remain In full fora and effect and In all respects shall be considered and treated as a nortgaq* on the real p:OParty and the rights and oollgations of c,. 10"M i•th respect act thereto shall be governed by the provisions of the Civil Cade of the State of California, and any other Sent 'Cable statute, Pertaining to mortgages w. real property '+ p 1h-I A9reem•nt $hats be binding u.-an and that Insure t0 the benefit of Slit heirs, aiecutorse administrators, uceessors and assigns of each of the Partial hereto e To the e.tent required to give affect of this Agreement as a mO'tq&q" thr tare •Deralo0er• shall be •07rtga901• and the City shall be the •mortgagee• as those terms art $led In ine the Civil Code of the Statf Of California and any other statute partalrrnq to mortagei an real property 9, If legal action Is commenced to enforce any of the Provisions of this Agreement, to recover any sue which the City Is entitled to recover from the Developer hereunder or to foreclose the mortgage created hereby, then in. ora,nillnq Party shall be entitled to retort. its costs and such reasonable aatorreys fees as shall be a.a.ded by the Court 3� 1-1i -033 RESOLUTION N0. 83 -e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF INC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE CHRISTMAS HOUSE (H.D. COUSINS HOUSE) AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMNGA AND TEEREFUAE DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY HISTORI', LANDMARK. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Ncaconga, California' has adopted Chapter 2.2tl of the Rancho Cuoamangn Municipal Codo relating to historic preservation; and ;1HEREA'>, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commisslon has Investigated the historic significance of the Chrlatms House and has hold public hearings concerning the Christmas House in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal rode relating t historic preservation; and WHERRAS, the Historic Preservation Co ©Ssslon has found the Christmas House to be a significant historic feature of the City, and thereby racam: ends it for designation as a City Historic Landner` NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornlc, as follows: Cnristnas House SECTI (24. N N OtD. l Cousins Hou e), located iat s92 Od ArchibaldaAvenue, hats that net the criteria established for designation as a City W storlo Landmark, and therefore, with tha recr=endatlon of the as Preservation COmmiS31on, dealgnates the Christmas House (H. D. Cousins House' as a City Historic Landmark. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day Of January, 1983. AYES: 6 NOES: ABSENT: 4 Jon D. Mikols, H,yor ATTEST: Lauren M, waaseran, City Clerk 11 17S, 'J:k CITY OF RANCHO CL'CAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 19, 1983 TO: City Council aid City Manager rROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 'rY Michael Lorg, Resident Engineer A.D 82 -1 SUBJECT: Reonest for Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 Relating to the Destruction of a Well Site at Station 66125, 6th Street CUGargj'. o � � z Because the method used fnr well destruction is an unforseen cost, a contract change order 1s necessary to pay fcr se'd work. The estimated ccst is $6,445 00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the afonamentioned Contract Change Order be approved Respectfully su m+fted, L6 Dl:bc Attachment 37 F1 z ASSESSXEAT DISTRICT 02 -1 CITY OF RAIW10 CICARNLA CONTRACT CNANU ORDER NO. ] Sheet I of 2 PROJECT, Assessment District 62.1 CONTRACT NO. A.D. 62.1 70: 6pradlr,n4tc:aln. Inc. , Cnitractor. You an hereby d'rtcttd to male the herein descrleren Changes from the plans and s"Ciflcatlms Ol do the fOila,fng described wwv,a was Incluced In the plans and speClflcatipns on this contract DOZE: This change Order is rot effective until approved by the City Eegrner. OfftflPllnn Of girt to be dam, estlmete Of quantities, and prices to Ad aid. Segregate between +ddll RVl earl at contrut price, agreed price and fact account. Unless OthOMSe Staled, Islas for rental of equipment Cover Only such t ma and twipdent Is act-' ly VIII ASO M alla4nc4, 011 be made for Idle time. Change regVested by City of Rancho CUC""a 'TWO 'T' ncrease or decr++ta rm temp anginal Cwaellty aw the Englner•s Estimate 1 hwtny IM ail at Statipr 66+2S ,in Street Ratriptlon: A. Wall Casing (steel) Is approafauttly g00 ft. dwep 1. NI1 Cast" Is 11 in:hes inside diameter C. well tiling contains a pup e4fe D. Wall easing catalog Into a sandstone formation E Water tibia Is At Spprprlately 42S ft below existing grouro surface Nut@: Above fnfx tlm wee provided by the Cucmngl COUntl Rater District ,bvt Stitt mat De •eifild In the field. Procedure: I am .A Pro shift 2 Aawme casing to 6 ft. belts finished grade 1 Fill Casing with Pa pea gravel to within 20 ft. Of ftnl+ned grade A TNll the IMIning portion Of the atinq with class 560 -A 2000 Portland conent Concrete S. Cap the casing per sheet 2 Of 2 using Class UO-A 2000 Portland cement cs.arete. Payment shall N cwsl4rtd a full Cp- oensatla for rmnishig all tabor, tv-,ruint and ate-ills for accomplishing said wor• and for prearing CM ilia to ncctpt Ultimate street Improvements. Wort 11 b profeto per Section 3.0,2 ent'tled •PIMnt• Of the itendard +prlf lest Ions Cstlmttd Cost: Decrease f or increase S a.1;�90 By rNia of Crisis Older [ we O --� cowpletia -111 Owe 40WIt" is follows: No AdJulturt �aWits" bl"— e ate Approved• Cl ty ngncer y: -- -Date - -.e rg uncerr4a cpntnZsar a•e Siren cr..e a r Ca+idariun to tM Cnange prpppt and hereby agree. If this proposal Is approved, inn we .111 Override all iOl ,exnl O,rnlsh all materials, erclPt as way Otherwise be mated ,bore• and oerfam all +trvlces necessary for the worn above jXCIrItJ. And will Ic:e't as full payw+nt therefrr the prices Shown abme. Itypro,ed- Due _ - v •Actor tlr: Atle As, +went Engineer Date _ Mayor: Due• 1 r N, �TO BE PLAG£O AT R "—"--- P70�ERRTE LIN /f OF'y, /; �qsT �t•� — — 0 1liYTi4EGRL YY /GRP� — � In �TO BE PLAG£O AT R "—"--- P70�ERRTE LIN /f OF'y, /; �qsT �t•� — — 0 n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhtONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 19, 1983 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gumez, City Planner ay: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner � o O z 2 PAU SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12242 - HUGHES - Appeal of P1 inn'n99 'Co—nn—T -Mon decision requiring a Focused Environmental impact Report for a residential t -act subdivision of 18 lots on 4.96 acres of land in the R -! -8500 (Single Family Residential) zone to be located oc the east side of Sapphire, south of Highland Avenue - A.PN 201 - 212 -16. SUMMARY: The Planning Commission, a: their meeting of December 8. 1982, regreq —� the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report for the development of Tentative Tract 12242. The Commissiun's decision was based upon the Initial Study which was prepared in accordance with State environmental laws. The Initial Study lndicatea that potential significant adverse Impacts may occur as a result of this project. The Commission's decision is consistent with prior decisions to require an EIR in con unction with projects filed within the path of the proposed Foothill Freeway. Two such projects, Tentative Tracts 11639 and 11591, have been recently purchased by the State to protect the freeway corridor. Attached Is a letter from CALTRAHS indicating that approval has been received to proceed with the purchase of the Hughes property It is recommended that the City Council uphold the Planning Commission decision to require the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report for this project. BACKGROUND. Attached is a copy of the letter from Everett Hughes, President - of Huones Develoacent Corporation, appealing the Planning Commission decision tc require a Focused EnvironmentoI Iapact Report. Mr. Hughes's reasoning for the appeal is not based upon the Commission's review r,G the Initial Study and the types sf Impacts anticipated with this project. Rather, the applicant contends that the City acted improperly by designating a major transportation corridor in the General Plan without purchasing the right- of -way. The development of this project mist comply with State environmental ,aws relating to mitigation of significant adverse impacts as a result of this project. The City Attorney has indicated that if reasonable minds question whether or not significant impacts will result because of the prefect, then the courts have upheld the preparation of an EIR. "To i Tentative Tract_12 ?42 /Hughtis City Council Agenda January 19, 1933 Page 2 Further, the attorney has stated that if something other than a oajqC transportation corrilor i:: proposed for this property, the City ,.avid not find consistency w1ti, the General Plan to approve the proposed tract. RECOMMENDATION: It is re:omaended that the City Council uphold the ann ng�omnission decision to require the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Repor: for Tentative Tract 12242. Staff will continue working with the applicant to facilitate purchase of this property by CALTRANS. Res ctfully -ubmitted, Rick KEZ C ty lanner J:CC jr Attachments: Letter of Appeal fr-;m Huqhes Development Corp. Letter of CALTRAHS 6egarding Acquisition Excerpt from December 8, 1982 Planning Lnnmiaaion Minutes Planning Comnnission Staff Report - December 8, 1982 S e =Y ;U C + , 4 • HUGHES .. DEVELOPMEW ER K@ C M I.=' CORPORATION 510 WEST UTRVS EDGE GLEIIDORA CALIFORNIA 91140 December 13, 1982 Loren Ifassennan City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9172') Dear Sir C 12131 963•'666 Rughes Development Corporation hereby appeals the December 8, 1982 Planning Commission decision regarding Tentative Tract 12242 It is oul contention that an Environmental Impact Report should not be required Or that if such a report Is required it should be at Citv expense The City has imprcperly placed our property in a ig transportation corridor without any intention to purchase said pro- perty. Additionally. the City has left the coning as single family residential It is under this zon4ng, we propose to develop tho property In consideration of the fact of this matter, we request the City Council to overrule the Planning Commission decision and request approval of our T..•tative Tract Map. Sincerely RUOIIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Everett ti ilutihes, Jr President Eltll kv Enclosure -( u 'J:.D CITY OF RAftCRO CUCACIONGA ADMIIIISTRt.TION DEC 15193/_ AM P 1 713191!OIUIL)11;2131d1516 C )ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs. r o w m, uuurwa. CAWo a "f December 27, 1982 Mr Lloyd B. Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucaonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Hubbs: 08-SBd -30-5 Reference is made to your request of November 8, 1982 that the State acquire the "ughes Development Corpnre'1on on Sapphire Street on a protection basis App rval has been received to proceed with this protection acquisition. Attached is a letter which has been sent to the Hughes Development Corporation by the State. If you have any questions please call me at 714/383 -4483. Very truly yours, R. D. MOfl!IIiIGSTA Chief, R/H Acquisitions Att l V3 • ONSEUT CALENDAR to approve lotion: ed by Reel, seconded by Stout, carried -00 unanimously, arcel Nap 6726. the CONSENT tI MAR, adopting Resolution to A ENVZPO:NE`ITAL p55t °NT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -20 - HPEELER - The deve lop�ent of n 12.00 are foot industrial building on 7.26 acres located lane in Ina I4nimum 10 act tK Industrial category PN 209-142-246 9), An the cast side of Utica, north o on to Parcel trap locatcdMAP 6726 norOtheNG Ra rrer o 1 Aculevar Archibald ?venue. A change frog 8 parcels to 10 parcels - APN 1077 -° 1 11 e 4 PU5LIw hEARINGS C. EllYIR0:f.1ENTAL ASSESStIEal AND TENTATIVE TRACT 1;64a - A residential tract subdivision of 18 lots on 4.96 acres of land in the R- 1- 8D50O(Singc Fc 3mllthResidential) High land lvcrue -APR 201- 212-16I.e east site or City Planner, flick Goraz, reviewed the staff report for this Stem anc Asso.:3a lc Planner, Dan Co levaa, gave a slide preeentatlon of the area involved Chair:an King opined the public hearing Mr Pat KtDP, Of J. P• Kapp and Associates' Civil subject stated tha -tad° g30,000 it would take to prepare an EIA for this subject property s a skewed Mr Kapp NL ther stated that Hughes DevelOPa dt the sburden tshou dnbefthescity's years, it ha.+ always been zoned H-1-8,500, , EIA Mr. Rapp indicated that this and no' Hughes Development in prep Cccilssion that the project irove ligical use f the wlthou tnanhEIRdrequirement. Further, that if would app trigger CALTRANS into some actlisszoon the this tract is approved, it would trigg property pproval asrthey wore unable of move stead without Planning Cow cost 'hair: an �(Ing asked Vr Kapp if he was aware that the General of through �thiso Cu:aconga provides that a = i or transportation corridor will go whether or not there is a Foothill Freeway, Point is that the pt. RaD7 replied that he did understand H 1h8s,500. however, Furthers, that if It is unoerlyirg zoning on this tigatiog measures, it is up to the Planning believed that there are nitermina6 Co= ziasion to M;cc this dA Cernina Llen and not the developers, Planning Co=ission Minutes -2- December S. 1902 Ma C � There being no .ltrther• guess ions or eoc=ntnts, the public hearing -was closed. Coalssioner FaMnl asked what the most recent cc= nication with ULT�..'+3: -' been and wnetbsr there is any dialogua going on. Mr. Sapp stated that there has been a with CALTRAPS tbrnugr. the city conduit am' that Hick Gomez bas f:. girded a letter received on Lece=ber i from CUTAA3S ca.ceruing the property; however, it did cot mention anything specific to the site. Vr. Sapp said that CALTRANS will not have any money until July of 1983• Further, that until the City takes sort action CALTRAO will not proceed with any appraisals and indicated teat what is happening is that the City is taking a .lelaydng tactic. Cnclssloner H.-Biel asked whit has transpired before between CAL RANG and the city. N--. &rpsm. City Attoi.. . replied that what r.ALTRANS will do, sbould not be speculated on. He indicated that the City cannot compel CALT.4ARS to buy the propuKf ar.7 you yst out look at a chicken and egg situation. N.-. Hanson cautioned the Coc:mlsaim to look at this project, estmir_ing it in the mate%- of what would happen if it were built, because the City is not in a position to buy this land. Mr. HoJsm stated that in previous sessions, Planning =1 j7cgineering staffs bave stated that the General Plan is preolsed on sox type of — st/west transportation corridor shdrh would be within the boundaries or this tract. Further, that it my cot be a freeway but a 4 -lane LL -ited acorns •oad, .lthougb the General Plan was adnrted and the City has p!ar_.ed as if it will be a freeway. Mr. Hopson stated that it there is cot a finewa7 smeone must study the facts of land use of doing soeething other thin a frc way for east /west transportation In the City. 14_ B7•l300 stated the daw in California is that if reasonable men could argue whether or cut there will be an Sgact from + envdreacental aspect, it regcdres an FUR be done. W. Hopson stated that if the Co--'+ -Son approves this tract after the environmental process is coglcted and if the tract Beets and miticatm the ErR impacts, tben on ratter shat CALTRANS does, it will not yrrpardi -.e the Gtty's planning by construction m this piece of property. W. Hopson stated that this is not a delaying tactic and that in framing it the ual he fns it world be absolute folly to approve this tract in any form or put sc,ething in the grarml with which the Camissien is not cca Lent. Mr_ Hopson said that if scathing else other Clan a frees: y Is proposed for this land, the tbais:ioo could not find consistency with the General Plan to approve this tract. M.•. Hopson stated that the renlonsibility for the EIH is Lhat of the developer and while it in taportant for the builds-, the City acts as the lead agency and controls the work on the EIR in doing everything but paying for it. Purther, that wbethrr it is one acre, fire, or $D, it is the develops• seeking to have somthing done with this property. Hr. Hopson stated %tit this is a recap of a siadlar situsticn that occurm' about 9 ninths ago and the law supports the Cit7•s reguirecent of an EIH. L] PlanalC; WalssLou Minutes -3- Deceraer S. 1982 y5 C C ir Mrdel riated That ubaterer action the CosnLssion takes tonight i !a: ccthi� to do litb CiLm&=, Y-. iapson sated tbat this is exactly true mad the ColnLssLon would have to Like this tract ao as to Preclude any transportation corridor. tr. Hoprz Stated tat OUE 4lse, the Conslsai= =ist determine r/sat fines M this P- PPG'7. C ti-. Cx - City 712^^L. stated that negotiations weld continue with CALT,AtS m tbts tract and the re„QSirauesit :ar as P.IE +cmld GCt atop the negotiations a: Was the tame as the other tw tracts fdrfcb had pr,rripusly been heard. Co=lss'ooer -2'mt a� ed Wit Prrcemtaga of the corridor is under CALTRAHS as cppoced to Private oseerJraip. W. Fa -L*r7. `- ev ---- ,%Ertl P- 3lneer, replied that It is approxlsately 25 9----= `Late oeerzbip. Chair= Z•_^.s- asked If 1L Ir staff's reeoneem"tiem that the EIR be focused a'�- tYi lips Lodicatei in the staff report. Yt. Co= replied affia`atirely, as outlined is the attachment of Part II of its Is/tial 5=13x. brs'_sloner Stoat stated that tb•= be attended a previous meetitg, the • !xi^atix .ss Mat a Lott of mind,- tns been doors on the prediction that this .wns be a frs w corridor ao7 a&td if it is still true that the City is not P'a =-'=S as to the frecmy so ttvt if tbero Were not a freevsy the Cit7'c S=d C=tarsl pan would still be In effect. It', 5o>e replied t:at the flood Contrel Can still go on as planned. Caaixzim Dtomb asked If Lh1s tract Were approred. Would it require a C a ?Ian amen^ -It. Y-. Ce-= ^ 71'.e.' tat tbls old Cave to vocar prior to the approval o. any Of sic xcr to drape czslstrxy. •' 'imrr _tot azklfd t'bzt =II, this is much a large 1cpact on the Ceorral ?:aa ccc ldo•t it 2 Ire an EU In any ease. YY. flaS r^y -Led tb2t this Is Ubat is being Csmzlde-ed t 13 evening. Yht—t Y2 r_> b7 fr oat. Brooded by &Mlel, carried unwL-nosiy, Ls require a fx.:" 32 relatL -ul to U01 use. tx2mzvortatian and circulation, socio- --- - - fxtars, rd yrrulatics distribution as it relates to Panne Cam}. LS-. GrPmz z.atn1 it" tte applicant bas the CPtica of appealing the Planning r„....._aian Idwi -I! 2 reyctring a focused M to Lbe City Councll. 7' -�—'S. fsiy Y.L�ates -a- Dece=t)er B. 1992 iY� C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE December B. 1982 TO: MEmbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, ienior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL A'SESSMENT TOREr -- A rrem• ent a i acres of land in Residential) zone to be Sapphire Street, south 201- 212 -16. AND Fact the loc of gob Z 2 C V l > 17:7 1 TENTATNE TRACT 12242 - su Id ', s on or ots on R -1 -8 500 (Single Family lied nn the east side of Highland Avenue - APN SUNNARY. Staff has prepared the initial Study and has found that the proposed project may create significant adverse impacts. As such, staff is recommending preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report which would focus upon the potential mpacts surrounding transporation, land use and planning considerations PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. The project site consists of 4 95 acres and — s� ocT ate- on the east sTde of Saophi -e between Highland Avenue and 19th Street. The site is presently vacant and void or any mtjcr vegetation. The site is presently zoned R•1 -8500, as well as the land surrounding the project site. The project site is shown on the Ueneral Plan as a major transporation corridor, which is known as the extension of tht roothill Freeway (Route 30). To the south of the tract exists a sirgle family residential subdivision, to the north exists a new church, ant vacant land exists to the east and west of the project site. The project proposal is to divide the project site into 18 single family res dentlal lots of not less that 9,450 square feet each. ANALYSIS: The major isiue regarding this project is the fact that the s t%T a within the project.: freeway corridor for the extension of the Foothill Freeway. The City has had two other like proposals submitted wits in the freehay corridor it which time the Planning Commission and City Council adopted a position and policy to require the prtparation of Focused Environmental . mpact Report which would antlyze the transporation, land use and planning issues of rrojects ccrstructed within that corridor. The two previous projects, which were sebmitted and acted upon by the Conmission, were required to prepare these inrused Environmental Impact Reports. Those two projects have not preparee the 4 7 ITEM C Tentetive Tract 1� .2 /Hughes Planning Commission Agenda December 8, 1982 Page 2 EIR since the State is presently purchasing both sites with freeway acquisiti„n monies. Attached is a letter from the city Engineer to CALTRAHS indicating the submission of this project and requesting that appropriate steps be init,ated to acquire tha project site Staff has prepared Part II of the Initial Stud„ which is the environmental checklist, and has found potential significant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this project in the area of transportation, land use and planning considerations These topics are outlined in detail on the attachment to the Initial Study and are recommended as the focus of the Environmental Impact Report. As this project was recently submitted, it is being brought before the Planning Commission prior to any review by the Growth Management or Design Review Committees in order that a determination can be made on the environmental aspects of the project If the Planning Commission finds the need for the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impac' Report, review of the design aspects of the project will occur con.irrently during the preparation of the Environmental Impact Repert. The discussion on the environmental aspects of this project, as contained to Part I1 of the Initial Study, found potential adverse impacts which are based mainly upon General Plan objectives and policies ir, the areas of the Circulation Element and othar land use policies. It is intended that the preparation of 'he Focus ^d Environmental Impact Repc will analyze various alternatives regarding these issues As an example, please find attached a copy of the contracts for the land use and traffic consultants that were prepared of the previous projects within the freeway corridcr and which establishes the scope of the Environmental Impact Report. RECOWIENDAT I Ott: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub —blic hearing to consider input on this protect. After such consideration, if the Commission concurs with the finding: of staff relative to the potential adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project, it would be appropriate to require the preparation of a Foc.ised Environmental Ingtact aeoort It 1s recommended that the scope of the Environmental Impact Report he Similar to that which is contained within the contract prepared for the precious projects lly submitted, ITY ® / P.G.VV:jr (4(� Tentative Tract 12442 /Hughes Planning Comai,sion Agenda December 8, 1987 Page 3 a Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utillzztion Hap Exhibit 08" - Tentative Tract Map a- xhlbit "C" - Natural Features Map /Grading Plan Initial Study, Part I Initial Study, Part II Letter to CALTRANS 'utter from Applicant gretments CJ 2 l% 4? .J w I rSJJJ.'��� �I� V I V /YlYll IY ~ . ml � � lY V` ♦ \ I I Jr- J_, �yI 11 �_IYIYi /l LLR _g LIO EL Q 1= Q Y, N` J� W �n �17 F� a �t� � .!rL. �a"i{ {nom ,y+r:• `r'J{t, / .. �`� �� / / ,a/ 1 ��I YI � �`� �t N 'irI (t�O•FY • 1 /I /J:/ In /lil i /•jr I J ` "it• Mfr �_ i j a CC t 24� f If e r A r �'•' I r� 3 3 � � � I }fl i.l 0 , iorT ,. of > • C, 4._J N ;i 7 N ie al �Ilt Fj g9� AA=0: n is ? j pc T I r• y • { !i A -{ L �JL i I { Y 14 y I \ a y T L�YW4 _10 i I r 2a iii .j a. yV i I { Y 14 y I \ a y T L�YW4 _10 Rum PIPH LMD 1155 W? ---� E E CI'T'Y OF RANCHO cucvmom", -1 PLANNING DIN'is10.%,T ZONING �--MAP FORTH 0 rrnu11j ,142. TM.D YAgM(r � &.r. • g'CA CITY OF ° ".�;CFIG CUCAMONGA = CLUtn J. lloq r 11 J.. C. Fro,t L r RickudhLDW Phulip D. tkhlou,r ` Igovmbcr S. 1982 - Mir. Robert Sbrningster CalTrans, District 8 P. O. Box 231 San Bernardino, Oillfornin 92483 RE: Tentative T.-act 12242 Dear Bob, Attached for your inforlmtlon are copies of tho Site Utilization Map, Tentative Tract bbp 12242 and pertinent correspondence. This trop was previously sulmitted to the District on October 28, 1982 for noriml rev ew. As Ia apparcal, this subdivision Is within the Route 30 Freeway Corridor and is a candidate for right -of-my protection. In light of the propo,ed developtent and threatened legal action, wa would like to request that you begin the appropriate steps to acquire this property In the absence of acquisition, the City will be forced to continuo the processim., of this project or face litigation. If you hive any questions, please call. Cordially, C12,A]KY17y DEVFIMIENr DFPAI MXNr eUM:IRIW3 DEPAIMQDNF UJItD film City Engineer +i: jan cc: City Council Jack la, Director, Cmmnity Developwnt Rick Cvnez, City Planner Duren hbsseloan, City tb.^.s.er 51� M OASELLYE ROAD, SUITE C • FUST OFFICE BOX 107 • EA ICIIOCL'C.UI0SCA.CALtFOR.';lAtl"3 • (717111 }1131 r,,�• 0 HUGHES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION $10 WEST CITHUS EDOC OLE<OORA CALIFORNIA 91740 November 3, 1982 lit Rick Ccnx-- Plawing Department City o: Rancho Cucamanga P.O. Dort 807 Rancho C'uc¢maga, CA 91730 Dery W. Gorrez: rd- �0 G E 0 0 0 V E tb+al a�y.teee CITY OF RANM CL1CAI MU, CON.hIUr11TT DE ' oph:tnt DEPT. NOV 04 OdL ltl R 11r h 12 '12 r t 14h5 C I'M U Ir1a,P1 1 h5 I hive received your letter, envl:•rnental checklist, and discussion of environmental evaluation relative to our Tentative :pact 12742. It is a shame that you as a representative of the City have decided that individual property rights do not exist in the case at hand. The City has the property zoned as a residential property, ubile shoeing it on the general plan as a transportation corridor It is our contention that thin IA a purposeful ploy to ueny us out- rigint to use the property. It it certainly less than hc•lcst to use t!,ese methods to hinder our project 0 It is evident that the cost of an envimmlental impact report Is a prohibitive cost fcr a small project such as ours Yeur assistant made It plain in our telephone conversation that the cost %filch he estimated at over $30,000 could stop imst pro- jects from proceeding. Thia Is, of course, exactly utnat you evidently desire. You are taLing our property without paying for it. This is contrary to the princi- pal and rights we should havo and enjoy in this country It appears %e will have to take all steps passible to protect ourselves fntm your action I have had discussion with Chl- trans, and they indicated that no funds were available during the present fiscal year to acquire property. The fiscal year does not end until July 1083. Additionally, they indicated that they uvuld not take any action until it %as clear that a development was ready to begin construction. Obviously, t1d.r cannot be done until a tract trap is approved We are therefore, seeking approval of our Imp without the unreallstic rendition of an environmental =Va, t report Sincerely, Lerotilly ilughts, Jr. President r ARi: kv CI" ` Fzc HUGHES DEVELOPMENT • "1 CORPORATION 519 wES. Ci7RU6 EDGE OLENOORA CALIFORNIA 91740 (7131 963•7956 Octaber 29, 1982 !I G' 2 V E D CITY Lf 3fj.Cl C '.LCA"'ONGA COC•h VaTV I rtr nr•JtvT f•EPT. !J04 on. 182 Iir. Richard Gr=7 A'A Pt1 Planning Department 71819d91!!11�1112131• ?1� E. City of Rancho Cucamonga 9328 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga. CA Lear Err, Gomez: As you IaI v, Hughes Development Corporation has submitted a tentative tract cup for our property which fronts on Sapphire StrOt in your City Our submittal has been certified by ycur staff as cemWlete, Ind we are now auuiting a public hearing re- garding this aoc *er. In a letter Pram your department, it was stated that if we did not agree to unive the time 1Lmit -. to consider our imp, ue would be required to prepare a focused E.I R. covering the impact our project uould have the proposed frm%ny Iu a fury ther conversation it %us stated that this cost could be in excess of $,10,000. 1 ice have ixv.•n very patient In developing our property We have united npproxLmtely five years since ue developed property adjacent to this, but outside the proposed frcc%Iny route. During that time, no relief has ueen offered in the form of property parchnsu. we must n•Av p1aeed with th +I property as well as another smaller parcel on C^rnel'an Street 7b delay us farther at this c!me in our opinion a,nstitutes a taking of our property without duI cr pcnsation Cur attornies fully afn-ee with the conclusion They are pmpared tc t.,.e uiat actions are considered appropriate, if we are hindered with unusual and unnecessary Condit fors as the letter ve mceiv:d threatened. We nre looking fonrnrd to an early resolution of this matter. Sincerely, JU)JES DMTU1'M%T CDRMR, \TIQY IIII 4 ,i President Ilughcs, Jr. � eside ltlent 1 D61: M• I i OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c1 — t=y rp Z Cherie J. D"Wt n Jw a Pram C. > Dkaod It MW Phmy D. sake ~ October 27, 1982 Everett Hughes, Presideirt Hughes Development Corporation 510 Citrus Edge Glendora, California 91740 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 110. 12242 Dear Mr Hughes: Thank you for your iobt ate response to our letter of October 14, 1992 Our letter was intended to seek some direction from you in the processing or this tract as it relates to the pr000sed Foothill Freeway zcrrido�. Pe* your request, we will continue processing the project with the fist step being completion of the initial study for consideration by the Planning Comiission. Our preliminary initial study has shown that this P.-oject may cause significant adverse impacts and inconsistencies with regard to transportation and land use /planning relative to the City's General Plan goals and policies. We hase * :nalized the initial study and copies of it are attached for your revier. He will be ^resenting the study to the: Planning Comission with a recamoemiation for a focused enviroimxntai ;mpact report tentatively on December 8, 1982 Meanwhile, we are sending a letter to CALTRANS District 8 Office in San Bernardino indicating this filing of your tentative mw and the need to bP.gin appraisal negotiations proceedings for purchase of this site by the State. We would also recomend that you continue your contacts with CALTRANS seeking their consideration for purchasing of your proper j City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs, has been working with the loch cocimmities' task force regarding Q e freeway corridor and has been in close contact with the Transportation Commission. She feel that we can facilitate the appraisal negotiating process. Accordinq to our conversation, acquisition by the State would also meet with your approval. C rO TOMC7J DDZ 07 ■aSpib CCU..190M& G1LG101 IA 11 73 • (719,1t3.0 f1 C Everett Hughes October 27, 1932 Page two... lie will continue to reTafn in contact with you on L" Processing and Status Of this Project in We of working tOgett r to tact both of our needs. If you have any further questions regarding the initial +tudy Or any other related cotter, please do not hesitate to contact me at any. tfau. Again, thank you for your coOperatlon. Sincerely, ClX"WIITf OEVELOPWfT HEPARTIFJ T PUl'O11HC OIVISIOR e) •: RILL mcz Litt' Planner iPG/pr//kip attch. U: L. Yassetnan J. Lam L. Hubts R. Dougherty 11.1 5t' r p. Everett Hughes, President Hughes Development Corporation 510 Citrus Edge Glendora, California 91740 SUB,;FCT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12242 Dear Mr. Hughes: Your application for the above - referenced project has been reviewed for completeness and accuracy of filing. As a result of the review, the proposed application has been found to be complete an accepted for processing However, this finding does lot constitute final • acceptance of the project. Final acceptance is not made until all environmental documents and findings are completed as required by the California Environmental quality Act. Since this project lies within the proposed Foothill Freeway Cor- ridor, we would like to take this opportunity to explain Rancho Cucamonga's position on the freeway and its relationship to the City's General Plan circulation goals. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has taken the position to protect the freeway corridor and has adopted the City's General Plan Circulation Element which plans for its ultimate implementation The City's policy Is to work with each landowner within the freeway corridor in conjunction with CALTRANS, the State Department of Highways, for the protection of the corridor. We will be preparing a letter to CALTRANS which ba >ically Mates that your company has submitted a tentative tract rap within the corridor and it is pending final consideration. Hope- fully, this will start the appraisal process which will lead to acquisition of the site by the State. There have been only two other tentative tract submissions within the freeway corridor ir. Rancho Cucamonga. In each of these instances, the City has equlred the preparation of a focused Environmental Impact Report. However, in both of these cases, the City was able to convince CALTRANS to work with the applicants in the acquisition of the properties. 6� 9320 BASELINE IIOAD. SUITE C r POST OFFICE BOX 347 r nANC1IOCL 'CA9IO'4GA.CALIFOR81A91730 • (714)989.I971 0 t .p"�� `itb � �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA g >` C� 3 c a 1 17 >IwJoe D. 7114r1r n..y.,.,,n Gluier J. Dagxrl 7��• 3: 11 Jrmn C. Frorl Rllhyd 31. Dril Phillip D. Srhlorur October 14, 1982 Everett Hughes, President Hughes Development Corporation 510 Citrus Edge Glendora, California 91740 SUB,;FCT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 12242 Dear Mr. Hughes: Your application for the above - referenced project has been reviewed for completeness and accuracy of filing. As a result of the review, the proposed application has been found to be complete an accepted for processing However, this finding does lot constitute final • acceptance of the project. Final acceptance is not made until all environmental documents and findings are completed as required by the California Environmental quality Act. Since this project lies within the proposed Foothill Freeway Cor- ridor, we would like to take this opportunity to explain Rancho Cucamonga's position on the freeway and its relationship to the City's General Plan circulation goals. The Rancho Cucamonga City Council has taken the position to protect the freeway corridor and has adopted the City's General Plan Circulation Element which plans for its ultimate implementation The City's policy Is to work with each landowner within the freeway corridor in conjunction with CALTRANS, the State Department of Highways, for the protection of the corridor. We will be preparing a letter to CALTRANS which ba >ically Mates that your company has submitted a tentative tract rap within the corridor and it is pending final consideration. Hope- fully, this will start the appraisal process which will lead to acquisition of the site by the State. There have been only two other tentative tract submissions within the freeway corridor ir. Rancho Cucamonga. In each of these instances, the City has equlred the preparation of a focused Environmental Impact Report. However, in both of these cases, the City was able to convince CALTRANS to work with the applicants in the acquisition of the properties. 6� 9320 BASELINE IIOAD. SUITE C r POST OFFICE BOX 347 r nANC1IOCL 'CA9IO'4GA.CALIFOR81A91730 • (714)989.I971 0 x Y I J ` t Evrrett Hughes Subj: TT 12242 October 14, 1982 2 Page 2 t, f il We would like to have the opportunity to meet with you at your coo - ., veniencv, along With our Engineering staff, to discuss your desires and a strategy to convince CALTRANS to begin appraisal proceedings on tnis site. If it is your desire to move in this direction, then we would probably ask for your voluntary continuance in any further Otherwise. staff h Initial nitial recommendation of afocusto udy and recoendationfor thepreparatione Envirnnmontal Impact Report to tho Planning Commission As you may be aware, once your application has been found complete, we are required to begin processing and make final environmental detemnina- tions within given periods of time. Therefore, it is imperative that we meet as soon as possible so that we may be able to move iF forward an this project. Please call -is any time so that we may arrange a meetijig. Than Y, you for your cooperation in this matter. C q • Sincerely, ? COMNUUTY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION �/�lcimtt'•l YL�./f� MICHAE, VAIRIN Senior Planner MV:jr CC Rick Gomez _ Lloyd Hubbs Dan Coleman x C z ACRLLICNT t This Agreamen L, for Profoulonal service-, dated 1961 is a contract bet.,esn the City of Tancho Cucamonaa, a muniellal Corporation of the rule of California, hereltarter referred to am 'City', end the P111Ming Center, A California Corporation, hereinafter referred to a- •Consultant•. The City has also contracted with a separate consultant, hereinafter referred to ae - Traffic Cons•il Unt' to Prepare a traffic report that w.11 --I" u • data be,* for the E 1 ,. AICITALS A The City desires to retain t- el-Mcal and professional services for the pseParatlon of an Envltomsental In Pact Report for Tentative Tracts 11169 and 11761 to be developed by Al La Loma Msadovs and Carnellan Inveetn ants, respectively, hereinafter referred to as the *Applicants- A. The City has aPProved the selection of the Consultant . to perform the work described herein, under the direction of the City, and in accordance vlth the terra and corailcarne set forth In thla agreement The City, as the load - gency, is raeponafble for tN Preparation of the E.I.A. The Corsultant shall act as an aoslstan. to thu City for the preparation of this E.I A. The City is responsible for providing or clarifylnq any direction In retards to the preparatiol Of the E•7 v C The APplicants are responsible for Providing necessary data to the City for preparation of the E I R Any corrospondsnre regarding the r I R shall be directed to inn "ity and not the City.s Conan tant In addition, the Applicant. are rae,nei Dle to provide it's city with the necessary funds for the comPlotfon of the R 7 P _ atlCfrrORE, CITY AND CONSULTANT AGREE AS MLL011S, A Scope nt tbrk, The Consultant shall prepare, porforr and "'Plate the following profoselonal services upocltled ill frrlDlt 'A•, through completion of the Final Environnonta. tapacc Report for Tentative Tracts 11169 and 11561 • l � G D LS 1111 wanaoerI Stave Z4Cutelan shall be ProJut Managar for the Consultant and "hall coordlnatn with the Project Manager of the Truffle Coasultant City shell appoint a Project Dlrtctor who Stall be r4t0onsible for official direction of the study on behalf of the City I Tire Schedule, The acrO- nchcck Draft E.:.A .hall ae completed b, the cgmultant within 16 weeks after taesipt of the t.•aff.a report Thia assumes that informtion and data generated by DICE Associates will be forwarded by cM City to the Planni Ta r., -,fit . .n the for- of a tcmfflg report within 17 useta The Consultant shall Pcovade I Detailed Time Schedule to the City following approval of this AVr&cm.nt. The Time Schedule my be altered by mutual agreement of the City and Consultant. D. Pa ant, The Coneuit.nt shall be ceapeneatad for the services provided under this agreement with funds deposited In a trust account wl0 the City by the project Applicants Payment Shall be on . - monthly beet., based on work ccaplatod In accordance with the billing rates ehovn In E -hlblt •D•, attached Consultant rhall bill tho City every four Ill weak-, which shall include a Progress report of the walk completed and billed for T:e total eompeTeatlen payable to Conn, tent shell be $11,000 no City shell rata Lt 101 of the ;• .1 :gas through cosPlstion and cartlfl edam of No rim, P.Z k. to .. , rnrplatlon of this agreernt In Chu event the E.I A. I. complettd and euttlfi X, a.t tho project le dlsapprov M or withelrwn, the ruminln g 10% atoll two Paid within JO day. of the fln.l completion of the corms of ,hit agreennt Additional service. reg+uSted Wyond the -corm of work _ in f-hlblt " ar attand.r,ta at additional ma.4Ags shall co ComponeAtod `- through a suparate Tina And Malarial. Contract, pnr the attached billing rate., Enhlblt •a• The Tim and MAtaelals Contract shall bw dratted and elgned prior to the reloaae of the 10. retainer. a... Termination, The City Say terminate this aaraeornt by giving written notice thorco, td the Consultant, Provided that the Clt'r shall be obligated to Pay Comultart for ali w•rk Perfecmod and fur all carnet Costs incurred prior to receipt of !Metro of :o rmtm elan by the Consultant - -_ al Mi C � G ,zw Or wiCHO CUCAWNG ut¢n asaeiv n. C cY anegi[ A1Tr5T, ar m. A bettor Do Caen ual ty Davelo pment annln9 tooter, Yrinctpa DATE,r -J APPROVED AS TO JM AHD C01='W c. 'a tv a -Dina! /i' n 63 F rqual Employment oppe tunity, The Cons.ltant is en rqusl Opportunity and Affttaative nction Employeot s-d agrees to comply wiLh the applicable requirements governing equal employment opportunity C Inspection, "is Citv in referronee to any request, for payment submitted by Consultant for services under this agreement shall have. th., right to examine and audit the record, of the Consultant to verify such payment. H. Authority, Each of the parties to this agreement represents that the parson ,lgnirq on behalf of such party has authority to do to i I Relationship of parties, It is undarstO d Nat i contractual relationship of tas Consultant to the City L that of an indePOndent contractor and all persons votking for or lndor the Consultant are Nair agents, servants, and emplayoes nnc agents, servants, or employees of the C,ty IM MI' 59 MHIAEOr Cw City and Consultant have executed this Agr.,n..t as or [he data at forth herein ,zw Or wiCHO CUCAWNG ut¢n asaeiv n. C cY anegi[ A1Tr5T, ar m. A bettor Do Caen ual ty Davelo pment annln9 tooter, Yrinctpa DATE,r -J APPROVED AS TO JM AHD C01='W c. 'a tv a -Dina! /i' n 63 KI c < EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK I Project Initiation /Data Collection (1 Week) In the first sleek following a notice to proceed (executed contract), the City will forward to The Planning Center all reports, documentations and other information pertinent to the preparation of the EIR Information and data generated by OKS Associates will be forwarded to and coordinated with The Planning Center, due within 15 weeks in the 'am of a Traffic Report. lI Prepare Screencheck EIR The Planning Center will prepare an administrative draft or screenchecl copy of the Focused EIR (2 copies) for review by the City. The Focused EIR w'1l be prepared in accorda "ce with the requirements of CEQA and i❑ the ronmat provided by the City The main body of the Focused EIR will consist of three sections, as follows: A Land Use The Planning Center will review and analyze the land use planning considerations that come into focus with approval or denial of the two tentative tracts This includes the following tasks: 1 Review of the City's General Plan. 2 Status of the Route 30 Corridor frrm thn ctatP Reninnal and Local levels 3 An assessrent of cumulative impacts associated with existing and proposed development with the Corridor q An analysis of the relationships between the prnrosed projects, current and future status of the Route 30 Corridor, and the City's General Plan 5 An dssossment of the localized impacts that the con- version of Route 30 tj alternative transportation facilities may have on the City's land use plans, as it relates to localized regional impacts. 6. Gitlgation measbres associated with impacts 0 B Circuldtion and Transportation Using information generated by BKS Associates, The Planning Center will assess the Impacts of the proposed project on a localised basis and will document any implications of project approval on a~ broader scale This category includes the following tasks 1 Report on existing and Projected traffic conditions 2 An assessment of project- generated traffic 3 Impacts associated with existing plus project traffic conditions 4 An assessment of future traffic conditions. 5 Other traffic considerations and miti;ation measures adaptable for the above C Alternatives The Planning Center will assess the Impacts associated with alternatives as defined in our meeting with the City on December 1, 1481. These are as follows 1. No project - A "no tracts" scenario that assicmes the Foothill Freewa; will be built 2 High -speed arterial, based upon a revised project plan 3 Low -speed arterial, based upon a revised project plan. The above alternatives are in addition to the project alternative, which assumes approval of the tentative tracts and that 0e Foothill Freeway would not be built The above alternatives may be revised subsequent to preliminary right -of -way studies conducted by DKS Associates D Executive Summary The Draft EIR will be prefaced with an Executive Stmnntry which will serve as a synopsis of impacts associated with the proposed project. General findings of the Focused EIR will be reported here. as well as a description of the impacts associated with alternative actions. Respond to Screencheck. Comments and Preuare Draft EIR 12 Weeks F, 1 \J Within two creeks of the receipt of all - omnents on the Screencheck EIR, the Planning Center •-ill provide 75 copies of the Draft EIR. (Allows once week for reprodcction) The Draft EIR. will include revisions as requested in Screencheck revied The City shall prepare the Notice of - Completioo and distribute the Draft EIR to appropriate agencies. iv. Respond to Draft EIR Comn;ents and Prepare Final E1R_ 2 Weeks All ct ments on the Draft EIR will be channeled through the Planning Divisi n and forwarded to the consultant. The consultant will be re- sponsib a for responding to these comments. All comments and responses shall be.ome an addendum to the Draft EIR Upon conclusion of the review period and the cmfsuitant's response to ail comments, the Draft EIR will be scheduled for Planning Commission review on the adequacy of the report and its findings Any changes or additions approved by the Planning Commission will be made by the consultant prior to printing the Final EIR In the event that such changes or additions constitute a change in this scope of work, the existing Contract may be amended or a separate lime and Materials Contract negotiated, Within 2 weeks of certification of Draft EIR by the Planning Commission, The Planning Center will provide 5 copies of the Final EIR and a camera -ready copy for reproduction The Final Focused EIR will include all revisions required subsequent to the review process for the draft document. V Attendance at Public Hearings (5 Meetings) The consultant will attend up to three (3) meetings with the City and/ or Traffic Consultant to review and coordinate project work Consultant shall also attend two (2) public nearings with the Planning Commission and one (1) public hearing with the City Council for the purpose of ® presenting the EIR and oroviding technical background for clarification, if necessary EXHIBIT "B" THE PLANNING CENTER: BILLING RATES PRINCIPAL -IN- CHARGE: $75 /hr PROJECT HARAGER: $40 /hr SENIOR PLANNER: S50 /hr ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNER: $40 /hr. GRAPHICS: $25435/hr • 5; 0 AGREEy[,,r This Agreement for professional s.rvrces dated 1982, is A contract bar.... the City � Y of Rancho Cucamonga, a nunlctpal corporation of the Stdte of California horalne fter referred to as 'City' and DRS A ... clates, a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as •COrnul Cant• The City hat also contratt.d rlth a sOparate consultant, h.rclnaft.r referred to a. 'Plannlnq /E I R. Consultant•, to prepare bhe main body of the 3 I R. C Tlr. Schedule. This Consultant spell sake ever able eff^ra tr c I s after e�plute the a ..lgnn..nr vl chin ftl tact. (15) uc eke after receipt of 1UthOnrtt[fa to praeccd T)la .,,c- that a tnron v 171 L{ ock rovi.v period of the prollnlnary daft report Th. tiro schedule ply be altered by Mutual agrecront of the City and Consultant If addlcionnt time is n edce Ma for echedullng of meetings re,i.v of Interim tCrlalbr Or Other Ynf.,S..O elrcenstances Otter Lt 6 RECITALS A This City deal... to retain tachnienl end professional services to Prepare a traffic report for an Envlrons.neal Impact Popert for Tentativo Tracts 11581 and 11769 vithln the City n( Rancho Cucaeongat and B The City has approved the eelacticn Of Consultant to -.sure r.- ponatblltcy fhr performance of the work desired herein to accordant. vlth the terms and uondltiens set forth heroin T11rprF0RE CITY AID COVSLLTANT AGREE AS TO TOLWI.S, A She Of COrkl Consultant shall perform the Profession. el eCr vtc CB aPecifled in Cxhlblt 'A' attached to this doeticO[ D Proleet Mai v.n Mike Rerned• J ehall be P.o]ee[ ha !or Co haul ten[ and shall Coordinate nger ulth the Prolcct Mehagor of the plennlna /E I R Con.ulwn[ C1[Y -hall appotn[ a Prolsct Director he v shall be roaponatblO or Official dirertior of the study on behalf of mho City C Tlr. Schedule. This Consultant spell sake ever able eff^ra tr c I s after e�plute the a ..lgnn..nr vl chin ftl tact. (15) uc eke after receipt of 1UthOnrtt[fa to praeccd T)la .,,c- that a tnron v 171 L{ ock rovi.v period of the prollnlnary daft report Th. tiro schedule ply be altered by Mutual agrecront of the City and Consultant If addlcionnt time is n edce Ma for echedullng of meetings re,i.v of Interim tCrlalbr Or Other Ynf.,S..O elrcenstances Otter Lt 6 0 Payments The Consultant shall In coopensatad for the services provided under this agreement with funds deposited in a trust account with the City by the project applicants Consultant .hall bill the City ovary four (a; weeks for work done and Bract expenses incurred (plus 51 for handling) in accordance with the billing rates shown on Exhibit -B' attached The bill shall Include a progress report of the work completed and billed for Ten percent of the total fee will be withhold from the final P•tyment pending codplatlon and certification of final E f R. prompt approval of the Draft Traffic Report and payment of the final payment shall mot be trreasonably withhold Direct charges Incurred in the performance of services Specified by this Agreement shall include such item as purchase of maps and photographs, printing and reproduction coats, traffic and sutsistonce, long distance telephone, delivery costs, computer costs and any fees, lnauranne, permits, and licenses applicable to this Agreement only The foe to be paid by the City for services by Consul - cant shall not exdaed $19,960 This fee includes attendance at up to three (3) maetings with City and /or Planning /E I R. Comultant staff tm review and eoordluate project work Additional services requested Deland the Scope of Work in Exhlbat W or attendance at additional misting. Shall be Compensated through a separate Time and Na torials Contract per the attached billing rates, Exhibit •0' The Tiue and materiels Contract shall be drafted and .lgnod prior to release of the 101 ratainct The 51.a 96D not to exceed price lnolddes all direct and indirect charges for the Consultant services Any project charges incurred subsequent to ]ono 1, L� 1982 shall be Oallvd in accordance to the revlanJ billlr.� rata Schedule rffrttave .Mne 1 1982 A copy thereof an 11 be submitted to the Cat- prior to lncurrirq any n eh charges C. Terminations The City may terminate this agreement by glvirq written no-ice thereof to Consultant provided that thv City shall to obligated to pay Connuitant for all work performed and all d.rect costs Incurred prior to reCeipt Ci notice Of Tominatlon by the • Conlult nt �� C �o / 0/37 G !� I Equal rnpl ) t Op,o runny, The Consultant i, An eq,.l opportunity and affircOtive action ecployer and agrees to comply with the applicable requirements governing equal toploycont opportunity G inspection) The City, 4n reference to any request for p.ry -.ant subdtted by Consultant for varvieaa under this greonent shall have the right to ..amine and audit the record. of the Consultant to verify such payment N Authority, Each of the parti.,s to this AV-esabnt rcprascnb that the per.., signing on Dena if of such part has the authority to do so I Relationship of Parts.-' It as understood that the cont[actural relationship of the Ccnsultant to the City Ss that of an independent cort[actor, a,u all parsons working for and under the diractioa of tl.a Congo lean. are the Consultant's agents, servants and employees, and Dot agents, servants, or epployees of the City • III WITNESS W rnor, the City eM Consultant have e.ecuted this Agreenent as of the date wt form ualow. Ci^r Or wic)l0 mcAItONGA ORS ASSOCIATES, PRIECIPAL AT-.OT- u[on 7. eaaernan. itY n.ger aeA nm, C \[Cote[ of C.Acs.nity Oovelopnent t7 DATE, FEB 11 La ?L AppROvrD AS TO rOMI AND CONTE.rr -2Q ZO-MT A v SCOPE OF SERVICES Task I: Exfstina Mims Consultant sboll review existing traffic conditions in the project vicinity, including status of existing and planned roadways, traffic volumes and traffic control. This will be based m a brief f.eld .,urvey, traffic counts obtained from the City and State, ant review of prior relevant reports. Tczk 2: Define Project and Alternatives Con4ulfont shall define project and project alternatives in terms of site traffic generotim aW trusportatim use of Route 30 corridor. The "project" shall corm: t of the proposed tract plan without development of any transportation facility within the ROJte 30eerridor. Three alternatives will also be considered in the analysis: 1) No project — a Ono tract" scenario that assumes Foothill Freeway will be Will. 2) A revised project incorporating a high speed arterial in the Route 30 corridor. 3) A revised project incorporating a lower speed arterial in the Route 30 corridor. Site trcffx ger% noun will be estimated far the PM pedt her. and men the day bawd an land use iquts by others Traffic generation elsewhere will be as utilized in the ongoing Mahn/YCtaria Traffic Study by DKS Associates. Allermtive Route30 corridor transportation facilities will be defined in terms of lane and right- of-woy needs within the tracts and generalized number of lanes and right -of- way wid: L elsewimere, bused an p-evious Route 30 planning studies. Findings will be xrbmilted to :he Ptanning/rIR consultant for use in defining land uses within the tracts. Tars 3: Irrooct Assessment Cossulimt sSclf assess the lang -term implications (i.e., at fell build -out) on cornminity- wide ciroulatim of the proposed project and its olternotiv, ,. This will be we by t.Crforcriesg up to three eapocity- restrained assign•nents anliz;nq the city-wide trcffic modzl end by cc:rpxing results of each nurl, The assessment will consider rrlutiv" trcffic volumes oral levels of service both in the Route30 corridor and on oth -r key, facilities in the City, and any major shifts of travel patterns which may result Any stynificent inpactz an focal circulatiar will al,o be identified Talc 1; Mlination i rv>rulfanf ',Sall identify p0352ole mme+sues to mitigete irrpccts of the project or its alt7natives. lhis will include are •anreissmmee level definition of major projects y .. • ,s necessary to upgrade 19th and Highland avenues as an oiternotive arterial route. 'Such projects would be defined in concept only; preliminary engineering design or detailed operational assessments of conceptual proposals is not inclvdcd. Task 5: Piannino Inputs Consultant shall provide ' nputs to the Planning /EiR Consultant on right -of -way implications of file various Route 30 alterntives. Consultant shall also provide projected traffic generation, assigned volumes and speeds, and vehicle -miles of travel based cn results of the City -wide traffic model runs. Task 6: Documentation Consultant shall document analysis and results in a brief traffic report suitable for incorporation into the EIR as a technical appendix. This report will provide resource material for the Impact Analysis being prepared by the Planning /EIR Consultant for inclusion a tlse main body of the EIR. Five copies of the preliminary draft Traffic Report shall be submit,ed to the City for review and comment Camera -ready crigincls of the revised draft shall be submitted to the City for appending to the Draft EIR. The City's Project Director shall be responsible for providing Consultant with a single. unified, unequivocal set of comments on the preliminary Draft Traffic Report an behalf of all individuals and agencies commenting thereupon. ConsiAtano shall not be responsible for response to any comments not included in the set of comments forwarded by City's Project Director. Re -nonse to eoriment on the Draft EIR is not included within this aeepa of work. Task 7: Meetings Consultant shall attend up to three (3) meetings with Ci , and /er Planning /EIR Consultant staff . n review and coordinate project wodr 7 Personnel president Vice President Principal Staff Principal Engineer Senior Eng•ncer Engineer Associate Engineer As.istant Engineer Senior Draftcperson Draftsperson T clnicion Word Proccs -e, VV • Tiansportation EXHIBIT "B" BILLING RATES Effe,fr ..funs 1901 405 141 "'feet fiw'a 610 Oo41111rl CalJromo 94017 .115 763.2661 73 0 Hourly Rate $69.00 $55.00 $47,C0 $47.00 0 $43.00 $4000 $35.00 $32.00 $32.00 $23.00 519.50 $26.50 0 • Pi r� L• CIT>: OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 19, 1983 TO: Hemuers of the City Council and City Manager FROM Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman; Assoc4ate Planner CODA�f0,1. t� Y, C C 0 197; 1 SUFJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL PSSESSMENT AND PLANHED DEVELOPMENT 82 -05 - NTAirtAZT'F2-3(55 - ROY - A change of zone from - u t roc VaMily es dent a j to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) for the wevelopment of E9 condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue. APH :01- 232 -34, 54. Related File: PO 81 -11 (Ter,tative Tract 11969) - KLK SUKKARY: This proposal 1s fo, a planned residential development consist Ting of 59 condominium units on 5 24 acre: of land, in conjunction with a zone change from R -3 to R -3 /PD and the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Tne Planning Commission, at its meeting of December 8, 1982, neld a duly advertised pu�lic hearing to consider the above described project and approved the related tract map with conditions as attathed and recomoendtd approval of the Negative Declaration and zone change. Please VA attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report, which fuliy describes the oroject. The proposed projeLt is consistent with all City related ordinances and plans. The proposed overall density of 11.3 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the General Plan designation of Medium Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units per acre) No adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. CORRESPONDENCE: At the Planning Commission public hearing, surrounding r2sidents spoke both for and against this project. Residents against this project cited increased traffic generation, lack of screening, the potential for increased crime, and the appropriateness of condominiums near a single family neighborhood. Thorn, speaking in favor of the project felt that c world be an improvement to the general character of the neighborhood and would not have adverse impacts upon traffic or crime. This item was advertised as a public hearing and notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Included in the Planning Commission Staff Report 1s a petition of approval fro. surrounding residents and a letter of opposition from a homeowner on 19th Street. f Planned Development 82 -05 January 19, 1983 Page 2 RECD: ?tENDATIOH: The Planning Comxission recoamends that the City ounull approve Planned Oevelopm�:: 82 -05 for the above described project through adoption of the ittached ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. ' Respectfully s altted, RICK EZ Cilty lanner R(q: DC: jr Attachments. P'annin7 Commission Staff Report and Resolution of APprova Minutes of December 8, 1982 Planning Comnissicn Fleeting City Council Ordinance 0 i s �r •+1& 4 4 _ •q Ll C �-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STAFF REPORT Qlpa &4 DATE: December 8. 1 982 mr, T0: Members bf the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: pan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: EHYtRO1p1Eh7At i Y ALSSESSHEHT AHD ptA;IHED DEYELOPMFHT 82 -05 _ ° t P e amt - A thangge of zone r04 Residential /planned t a Development) to R -3/pp (lfuitlpl� -3 condomin iva units en 5.24 a-es of for IanC located develoment of 59 Street, east of Hellran Avenue - APH 201 - 232 -34,54 of 19th Related File: Po 81 -11 (Tentative Tract 11359) - FLK PRO.)ECT AfI) SptT�E "DESCR LP eI3 Zone aRPPf !cart Is requesting approval of a P aunt• ' o sale of I9th Street, east of He l) ( 3vPD) Pending. presentl va p H than Avenue Exhibit9- lj�at`rne °n property north grade. A Previous was pPlllca cation was the ledheastt at approximately a 3pkerccnt KLK, revle'led by the Planning s Property, Tentative !nett . The project 9 �tlR°issiun Per the attached Minutes proposed Foothill Fr, site is on pecetber 9, 1981, • the east b envoy Crrridor, on the bounded on the north b single Y a citron grove and single family single fam11 Y the a'n!•Y residences and Y residences y reslLences Map (Exhfolt •1•), Tho water tanks, as Indicated c�, and on the west by dwelling units Proposed protect dersfty the Site Utilization designation of per acre and 1s therefore cons intent ,! approximately o pedium Density Residential 4- th the [eneral Pan AIIAALY� ( 1< dwe llin, unit; per a--re). Management The project ha, been reviewed by the Design Review, committees dud Grading Committees. All the issues autl r, Plans and are reflected on the Tentative Tract ma Growth reco4naanded conditions f B -errs of these been designed with a e approval. This Exhibit ), de. ^,tlrnent connections street Planned eevelo has private , Pment Project IS ,) d to futt-e systeJO, therefore tL• >re arc no street the de [ail being Provided from lglh on surrounding properties. Access t° )eft- site Plan, Exhibit •C'. 19th Street and Street will Hellman be wivenue, turn lane to resolve traffic as shvm an carried to the southeast corner iuf circulation concerns, ened to provide a swales, inlet structures he Project site Drainage will be water will then 6 and under sidewalk drafns at with a combination of e directed to Amethyst, as sheen od at 19th.Street where the 7�, ITEM E Planned Developd 82-OS /Roy Planning Commission :;enda December 8, 1982 Page 2 DESIGN REVIEW L"ITTEE: The Committee has worked with the applicant to resolve concerns re at ve to the site plan configuration, recreational space, and previous Planning Commission concerns regarding project density. The Site Plan has been redesigned to provide an open space /recreation area in the renter of the project with a large lawn area, pool and tot lot Therefore, the Design Review Committee recommends approval of this project. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part i of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attac ed for your review. Staff has completed Part II o.r the Initial Study end found that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, steff recommends issuance of o Negative DeClaration. FACTS FOR FINDING: The subdivision maps have been prepared in accordance with ty staff naa—R'sanc, policies and the project site is suitable for the proposed sutdivision. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was placed in The Daily Report newspaper and approximately 28 public hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Prior to the public hearing, the applicant met with surrounding property owners to discuss the protect. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RLCOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pueltc nearing to corsider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration tha Commission concurs Witt, the findings and conditions of approval, the adoption of the attarhed Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. R.'pfCtfulrj, submitted, f LITY PLANNER RG DC:jr is 17J • F] Planned DevelopmA 82 -05 /Roy Planning Coamtssion Agenda December 8, 1982 Page 3 Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit '8" - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C" - D °tailed Site Plan Exhibit 00" - illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "E` - Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plans Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "K" - Off -Site Drainage Exhibit "I" - Site Utilization Map Minutes From December 9, 1981 Planning Commission Meeting Initial Study Part I Resolution of Approval with Conu'tions C] i{ i 7 f C C I%. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLMNI \G DIVEON V V NORTI 1 rrr•_\1, . lfy305-� _ TITLE= Aar B-a Y5 I1 � (c .0 TTrIV "• 1: TTrT71:- r-EXIAIM IV V Nuir i � C L� ° I pVvL'7� !• •�•• �•`r ' • • .✓'mil: En �4 • � o �gy(pp��,� ac y _ a 0 � �r.r� • L.Ja - V!at O � u � I SSLe �. • TREE LEGEND f 'J Nt 6v ear...o....e •err °�...�. TYPICAL ROOF PLANS - - -•_ 1 ac _ac am am ac V V FORTH CI'N or ITG\1: RANCHO Ct uki \l0.NGA TfiLl Ii ? PLL.NNI. \C Lq \'M.N N11IMT, SG \III ■1 I • l=C�^ on" mr( EMS U91 FRONT ELEVATION IInA W 9 t•.A1c i WrM END ELEVATION - HEAR ELEVATION Clrl y or rrr%ll PLLV\ING "VISION �3 1.1 c c 1— - IT o I } po fI 1I �',',I�lk �.� El�'',,CI�, :� ,y ��7• �I ,1 :� ; `• f 11 �9• ii ? �-1 i ..1 F r ',J� u� � °.. y F- I) � � q LLP77 �•�I1� C 1 Imo; LI � iB -9 • I ° �l � - e!l��ul�� I{ - m LL N N D-i r 9 r iC121FI ����I6I o CITY OF rrr\ll 12759'T- RANCHO � CU&1\IONGA TITLr, -- -E I LV IIs PLANNING DIVISION DO IIIAT �SC\Iyl w 4 .> _ = == Bpi _ - -- l ,.nt&r NORTH ary OP iTr• -m 71t /2!525' __ U: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIT- 1i,�Ln PLANNING DIVISION GNIiII11P _SGV.L' �� C ter-,..•.. t �::.. -:,, I V c: V s � c FJS 24/2? 6 i ? i r i \Y �(UPA <3 V t G i F is 2. /Ow en PM N1 P.,IB Le/ 6 OLK 7 LZl! '�ilJC ••• • � V \01M 1 CITY OF ITf_\ I, AMAM PLAN \CI-K? CUQk N TO GA TITLE, q , PLA` NI. \r DIVISION L' \I IIItiT' SG \LL NORTH 0 [, CITY oF ITEM, -406 RANCHO C[.G1,% IO\GA TITI I :-' 1I* E ! MUZAMVJ 0 PLANNING 'DIVISION f•_ \I I iu- M scu . 7S 7 4-(le M055 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND PUNNP.O DEVELOPMENT :10. 11 -!I ® (TI 11969) - KLK - A change of zone from R -J (Mel tip L111 (TT Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple - Family Residential /Planned Development) and the development of 67 townhouse /ccndeminium units., on 5 24 acres of land located an the north aide of 19th Street, cast of Hellman Avenue - APN 201 - 232 -34 and 54. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report and stated that the applicant has requested ptatponement on this In order to re- desido the site to include a piece of najacent property which has recencly been acquired Mr. Vairin indicated that the public hearing should 3e opened in order to receive public comments and to provide commt to to the applicant from the Planning Commission. Me Vairin Indicated that this public hearing would not be continued to a specific date and would therefore be readvartlsed. Chalrmn King opened the public hearing. The applicant indicated that he would rather not speak At this time as he preferred to wait until the project Is redesigned before making a presentation. Mr Jim Frost, Councilmember, addressed the Co'malssion stating that he had pnrticular concern with this project and the 155' x 300 strip that fronts onto 19th Street, relative to compatibility with future development bo.h to the east and vest. lie asked that the Commission take this into �onsidcration in chair deliberations as it appe.,rsd Clint the density change would be considerable and would be forcing tccal overall det.sity into that strip :" alrran King asked for a show of hands from those people in the audience .no were interested in this project. Approximately six people raised their hands. Mr Halsey Taylor, who stated he lives directly across farm the Hellman Street entrance of this proposed project, asked If this was rye beginning of a complete change in the neighborhood and whether this was an isolated development or the beginning of a trend ,'It faitin stated .hat the property to the west Is planned for lower density but that this project and the corner Is zoned R -J Mr Vairin indicates that the property to the went and north is of single family character and that Amethysr to the e,iot wiLl be higher density as this In the freeway corridor He furtra stated that Hellman is the divtding line between single family and mulrlple family There being no iurther cnrnents, the public hearing was closed Planning Commission Minutes -3- December 9, 19S1 iii C� C Co=issloner Sceranka ctated that there Is always a question of compati- bility on any develapment adjacent to single family and in this case they are dealing with 4 -14 General Plan designation and the property to the cast is planned at a higher density lie indicated that as lie saw it, the biggest consideration her" would be density but people will question the impact on streets and cervices and what the project will look like He Indicated that the major emphnsis in this case when it came before Design Review, were the sttbacks on 19th Street and Hellman and they were talking about setbacks from the curb of approxi- mately 50 feet Mother requirement, he stated, Is 50 trees per acre in order to minimize the effect of having 2 -3 units together and that this requirenunt is higher than that of single :•ally homes ire in- dicated that with the heavy landscaping, the negative effects of higher density in terms of noise and traffic would be mitigated and that they on Design Review were trying co make sure that the project would be an improvement to the quality of the exlstla3 .rea Commissioner Tolstoy stated that when he first looked at this he felt this project was an innovative assemblage of parcels but ttait he had a couple of problems with it He indicated that frontage oa 19th Street was one because the awisting neighborhood 1s single family and that the proposed density is a little high and to not compatible because of the depature from single family homes He felt that this could be mitigated by a really good buffering system. Camnissfoner Tolstoy stated that he felt the architecture was dissimilar In what is ptesently in the neighborhood and is a little startling for • it. Co=issioner King stated that he disagreed with Commissioner Tolstoy about the architecture and felt that this Is a good project He further stated that in viewing the configuration of the site and location it appears that there is too much density and that the total planning has to relate it to the site and existing neighborhood. Commissioner King asked if there we a any further comments and oxpl.,�nad that this project :,uld again be legally readvertlsed and residents would again be notified of the next hearins'vhere they would again be able to comment. There being no further comments, it was moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to continue this project as requested by the IPplicant and to readvertlae this when it again comes before the Commission for heating Cornissioner Sceranka stated that he would like direction from the CorZllcslon so that when this comes before Design Review he knows what choir feelings are tnward two scary units Planning Commission Minutes -4- December 9, 1981 is IMF 1 Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it was his personal cpinjn that blue rcofs will be incompatiblu with the neighborhood. lie also felt that the Innovative design was our of character for the area. e.•salhly, more corventloeal designs would be core compatible. _ Commissloner King stated that he disagreed with Commissioner ?olsta7 on the refer fir Lan stated that because so:e residents were reluctant :o appear before the Commission, he wished them to kaow that they rare veleoce to acme into the City offices co ICOk At files and tG here any gvescioas that they may have, enswared. Me Indicated the imporraaca of doing We before the project gets further alo.-z so that staff scold be ab,s to communicate their feelings to the applicant. e a a s it RO::IFVTAL ASSESSHMIT ADD PLUMM DEVELOPzOrr No, al-13 - (TT 12030) - PROPERTIES - A chardr of zone from R -1 (Siogle- Faolly Residential) r) /P D. (Hint' Flo- Family Resldential /Planned Development) and development of 128 condominiums on 9.2 acres of 1=d located on hertheast corner of Archibald and Peron Ecalavard - APD Z09- Curtis Johnstone \b.pra t Planner, rrslewed the ewff report. Corrmscfoner Tuld If the voll to be put up along Archibald , d Ferca would be o wall and drought iron combination, Further, if boning would tied on tie "certot of the wall evil whether, if he were coming up on Arch. uld be able to sea any of the parking within the complex. fir. Johnston replied [hay witht setbacks and broken wall, you wood: nee be aware of the parking. fir Vairin stated :hat you coy be able, nee the parking coning in from the north to the souri, because of the stre grade. Mr. Johnston stated chic last Tuesday night a ring was held bscween the neighborhood residents and the developer and to was o0 opposition; however, there were comments on traffic, arcess to adjacent school and the wall. The conclusion uzs that cost of the rem ents were pleased with this project. Clairnnn King opened the public hearing. Mr Mika Porto, representing the developer, addressed the Coeiii ssIN. graced that it was their hope to offer affordable housing thrrcgh thil project De Indicated that txelssioner Tolarnyrs cear.:uca .Olacfve t hcin2 able to see parked cars through the 9,311 rrm the scree' would :e Planning Cormisvvn fllnuces -,- December 9, 1931 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • INTTIAT STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Pee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, thin form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is make. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public maeting at which time Yne pr ')ject is to be heard. The COmmittee will make or.e of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a uignificant will be prepared, aor 3)d An addit4 oneltinforrmmaationeeeport should Le supplied by the applic�,t giving further irfora- tion concarntng the proposed project. ' k PROJECT TITLE: ALTA TO)4A GOODS', APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRFSS, TELEPHONE: Charles RO� LOr.�:^urtlon Inc. 3401 A. Fest Chapman ve, range, c.a co9 a4 -p e - NAME. ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED 'OYCERNrNG THIS pROJECr• Charles Roy, 3401 A. Hast Chapman Ave, Orange, Ga., 92669, 714-o 93 SION On PROJECT (5 2y�3- 2jc AND ASSE -SOR PARCiL NO.) APOl � LIST Of IER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOrAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TfL- ..AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERIIIIS: Cal T -ans California Department of Real Estate r � - i x I 0 PROTECT DESCPTPPION snit Townhrme Condominium project ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE :DOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 5.24 Acres: 1 eXistln¢ d•rellini_ __ ----- . w -41 i - S9 units wit" DESCPIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINP OF THE PROJECT S:T_E INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRP3HY, PL7u4iS (TREES) , ANIFUILS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESC:IPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AHD THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): fY��_ t 2a des aced as state hl�haay. Eosr_• Qrrc_drd and older rural sSn a an v tie nR. \v1 Mural 9lstorical or Scenic aspecte c nn signs ricanto Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually gmall, may as a whole have signittcant environmental imp ` No I -2 IFa IJI_IHISHIS E ESS NO X 1 X 2 X 3. X a S 6 sub contours ?stantial change in ground noise or � s9atiniel change i n existing vifir Create n7 sewage, services a(Fo2i see in demand for Eire, water, general plan designee existing Zoning or ve any Create the ned ting trees? now many? 30 Approx oxantidll encas,dousemoo materials o- c subs a. fIammables or explosives? nv v�,- INpo"ANT; n z0 Pag. al units, ocompl,,, hnstruction of e form on the data Ti ndA nfornatlonire ,,.certify the statements fern hed e a information of se abilitvl and for 'nis initia present th< ted nfo e valuation nnmay be ere utr furtherna correct facts theate statement,, and can be -'ado by echo rev submitted that additional y Oaten •�v ( �- l ent Review Co adequate tteeeats Signature T1 t1e 7-3 S G3 n C RESIDENTIAL. CONSTROC';':Oc The following iniz=Atien should be provided to the City of Rancho Cccsmcnga Planning Dirts=on is or'-er to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to acc=z4ate the proposed rrsidential development. Charles Roy Conati- Actlon, Inc. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.:gr000sed Tenative Tract §12305 A. . specific Location of Project: A loth St. Rancho Cucamonga 34 L 54 PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE $ 'TOTAL �. Number of single family units: 2. NLrbcr of multiple r.tuily units: _ an 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Xu v 1903 04 Earliest date of u� pancy: Feb 1984 Model and t of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range A - 2 80,000 B - ? 77, OJO C - 3 04,000 if, I -Z 9y I December E, ltn2 I strongly oppose the ?LAJI:IED DFVFL0 °:;1:'JT 82 -05 - T--!:TATTV- TIL', 12305 - ROY - A change o" zone from 1-3 (!_ultinle ?amlly Residential) to q-3/PD (SUltiple Ncnlly Rea Jdent lal /alarmed Leveleiment) for the development of S9 condominium unit3 on 5.24 ucrom of lard located ne -th of 19th Street, oast of Hellman Avenue - A ?!t 201 - 232 - 34,55. Attractirc core people to an already congested area reuld, in =7 oa:nicn, only intensify the problems ae already have in our cc xn nity. ?robloms mutt us traffic concestion, laeV of school sjacr, u rising crime rate, otc. Sincerely, Alan Carlo- 5332 19th St. Alta Loca. 917CI 05 0 0 v 7 M: C C K� �Tri�3os� Roy 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,•py� .2P/o /PSC�h�S �O�d 44�iJO.P /3 [.����iin I the undersigned have seen the plans and pictures cf Alta Lorca Woods and agree with the concept of this development. 4 600' .roc/ %us i t r c r TO CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMOIIOA I the u•idersigned have seen the plans and pictures of Alta Loma • Woods And agree rith the concept of this development. NAME DATE � � ADDRESS CITY PFS# (optional) I %S! a c�i.e ✓,i . G :170 /- :c ;.11/5 Gc z,f Z o... t dye) • To CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ` I the undersigned hgvc seen the plane and pictures of Alta Loma lfoods and agree with the concept of this development. HAM DATE ADDRESS CITY 'H'# (Optional) s /TCI)Selto CLCC¢9ncM�jcL //�� L6YYG??2-lj.1L CwyL i'— L •. �.7E�,r .D [}% Oar/ i r s� � 1 GJ7C /La LCtrOJYJGTJf��. C2 9 "701 /-2 R05 V �1.,7 2 i?[U�lf17Li � L�C %�/2 JLO/7JL� L2%Jl� 2 ,�4 �Lt'L CIJ�nl�le e`e. �n J�l�n <�o Cei /c+�y�c�39�rz �- lr>zr1ltL -�� /L elL �lZl4 L t2 rl( JOlC%1L4110 .�D2 CGc11`2 ze C':' lZ4O ,C?l'i) 2 .OG JJL�/CLL iC• /Ac E �L�L'Y cC' C fiL > > r. -<JZ C Lu�l J >t� %v fit ✓ t�i)W V0.3-99a 019 1 ALFRED T. WILKFS A R f /I ITECT 1 -10 -83 Department of City Planning Rancho Cucamonga Cal4f. 91730 Re:PD- 82 -05, and TT 12303 We have examined the plans for the above project and attended tha Planning Comm. hearing on it recently, and have no obJrction to its acceptance as it now stands. Alfred TGA'i es, partL ner for WSM partnership, owners of 4.5 acre parcel immediately east of subject property. J 1217 LINDA FLORA DRIVE LOS ANGELES, CA goplp do 476 JESS January 12, 1983 Rancho Cucamonga City Hall 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Gentlemen: I have seen the proposed plans for Project TT12305 Roy, to he located nest to my property on 19th Street in Rancho Cucamonga I feel the projact ham :men well planned and will help in a positive way to meet Rancho Cucamonga's housing needs Sincerely, Gary Xkfla3l 9412 19th Street GUM:tah "4r i J 0 RESOLUTIOR NO. 82 -111 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANC,IU CUCAMO M PLANNING CO14115510 RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED OEVELOP14ENT 116, 822-6 REpUE7,'ING A MO& IN T E ZONING FROM R -1 T6 R -1126 FC9. 59 CONDOMINIUMS, LOCATED NORTH' OF 19TH STREET, Ed56 OF HELLM41i AVENUE HHCREAS, of the 4th day of October, 1982, ar apWifcatfon was- f4lEd and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of December, 1982, the Mandfdg Gmcs sftiu held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Sectfdty 658.4 of Char California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning CamifssfM has made MIT following nom: 1 That the subject property Is Saitabie for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use fm the surrounding area. 2. That the proposed Zone Changr world not have sigaificant impact on the environment ndr the surrourding properties. 3 That the proposed Zone Change is ire conformance with) the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Ranch', Cucamonga PTanafng CWession has foudd that this projec¢ wfMnot create a significant adverse impact dn: the emrfra%%= and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative 0eeTar`stfon cm December B. 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the PTannfng Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc=nga hereby recommends approval on the Sth' day of December, 1982, Planned Development No. 8e -05, 2. The Planning Commission hereby recomaedds that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Develdpmewr No. 82 -05. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the PTanding Comm'fasfon' ® shall be forwarded to the city Council. m Resolution W. 82 -11C Page 2 4. All Conditions of Approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 12305 Shall apply to this Planned Development. ' APPROVED AND ACOaTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OECEFLER. 1982. PLANNING CO;;MISSIOr Of nEitITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By 8 I, JACK LAM. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and .regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on tire 8th day of December, 1982, by the folloving vote -to -wit: AYES: COA:MISSIONEPS: Rzael. Stout. Barker, MCNIel, King NOES: COaMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COP?IISSIONERS: None 103 C � RESOLUTION NO. 82 -112 + A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COKMISS10N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,_ CALIFORNIA, C9NDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT ?WP NO. 12305 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12305 hereinafter "Ma,)" subm'tted by Charles Roy, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing • real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described ds a residential subdivision for condominium purposes of 5,74 acres of land, located on the north side of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on December 8, 1902; and WHEREAS, the city Planner has recommended approval of the Map ;object to all condition: set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the pity of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: fie Planning C,,mission makes the following findings to regard to entative Tract No 12305 and the Mac thereof (a, applicable interimr and proposed general tand with all specific plans; (b) consistent with alt eapplic bleh tentative interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is phys+cally suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avo•daole injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; 1e) 1he tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; If) The design of the tentative tract +111 not ccnfltct With any easement acquired by the public at large, .' now of record, for access through r.r use of the property within the proposed subdivision F p n, 107 - t' :Af Reso11 ton tin. 82 -11f Page 3 PLXUIING PVSAS;UN OF TgyfTY OF RANCHO CUC MONGA I, j= LAM. Secr aa etary of the Planning Cotssicn of the City of Rancho Cucamnga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introducedt passed, and adopted by the Planning fcmiss IGri of the anLtnefBthnday of Dececberatta regular y the following vats- to- wit:�Ssstrn held ATES. CO MISSIGUELS: Stout, Reapel. Barter, )SCpiel, King ROES CO MISSIORERS: None ABSEM CM14ISSMERS, None I0 � § .a Z. \ 5S 2 2 \ \ƒ \/ \ = 2 £ zz a / 47- } {� E Q!. 5 \ /tl7 =&7 \ =\ # \2T 2 g 3 Q !•| '— 2 = / - _ -- \ - 2 - s- - s 'ZZ ��, ;} — - - a — - -- :.; } \!\ \ / {// ` � � \�\ } \ 0 1] L -A Jo [3 YL. � � �VYB 2_ S2:E i o:= 'Y.'•� xaQ :• �: s s � 't.: ez„ � eE z a'�a =i'So cc ' +s � �, -= _.t♦ _ 2 -G .E E P' bad LSL `LsLi �� ,�. "f.-S� e-1r;,s t - - ¢a i 2: ^ 1_`zE:Y = 3� • ZZ I ESL -•$- t` ��_ __ 2 Y ` 'S' - A• xY'. °e8° v di d°'ZL .S: L7E5'" -O_ .LS.' ❑ - 8 � I 7 I .E t3Y- iY`r= ' ; NII - 3 I n.2 3- Lb o�' MiIYE -S � j l 2 i:5 " S S :fi S I C L.' .9 ^ -z; sae t -fi-: ° -E .S2g2 885 b Y I &iE a:_ i' )LI z Ea- ez• o i? xxo s ;. �: ;��t _'_is 2(�E = aa5 2'2 IT i' 12 h2 :Z,c 3�a a a tae ;? 1- 8� ..a : ❑:? : "sy ?a C:� re. a8 abs a —2 #�3 n�:ac °a� 201 �s' S ez s o =- FrP? 1:a�3 ?_ =�.xd� E 3 48 - ? Yr SF it a8 EYa'.M1 . Y.2Y Ld9 f_CE jz z 2L g¢ex �� ,SF Six aYS ❑a a= a 5- ?Y Y" =E _ 71 =q -- - c� - i _2 i tx iIi re _`_ Y�¢° 1. ___� __� ,1n_ .2.. d it 4_ _ ❑- �_' -- w- : -.l Y C a s a= e: I �2 F f3 t ?'SY ° �? L .^. o` - n 2 i.z St `E _�' Y 5. �? % 21 aY a f? 2- .*• F I_' CI Y FL iEa gY E �$ •^ xe& �i R -'L :F - `21 2 E3 �Y 2 C7° 2_g -- 12 a. _- -5C� Y2. x Y.. .YX �• � aC �S ?� S. _. _- ES E9 e- EI os -Y iFS i�S •a °t -. d��l <• �F � •� Ey I . oa iL -S E_< x M .S° ': ^2 - gl zY cX E� J ae - 161 � _ °a Y� a I Sao a 3 �fi.J 3& _ Cf, i:'+' i:.. -� -s ❑a sae c .. i ae° ;. �: `.a- 5: a.r? .i -,e 2c! nd. ;, S Y- 'Ix el 3 � I I + °. c.. _ E"t. °+ n2 —'•5 y I �t I�e� y •y �I y �I I C � � § } � 0 � | =E \ , 1 Z - §| . \z � ! §� } ■jf, a \$\ /g f \ { I\ Q§lQ =g ;Qj! ap 9 \! !. 0 � | =E \ , 1 Z - §| . \z f \ { I\ ap / it I} \/ - C\§ ! | 23 \!!. !| ;!z! _ _ \§ ... ,!_, \ § \ }tj 0 � H • e a a o a E. E11V I RONMENTAL ASSESS.4V A11D PLANNED DEVEwrlxnr ocwo - itntA11M ienw 12305 - ROY - A change of zone from R -3 (FL 1tlple Family Residential) to 8-3 /P9 (Multiple Family'Rosidantial /Planned Development) for the development of 59 condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue - APN 201- 232 -34 A 54, Associate Planner, Gin Coleman, reviewed the staff report stating that phone calla have been received both in invor and opposition to thin project. "�, Coleman read a letter from Alan Marlow, 9332 19th Street in opposition to the project, that had been received today because of increased traffic and the potential for increased crime. W. Coleman also t -quested that the Commission review a petition circulated by the applicant stating that those signing have seen the plans for this project and approve of its concept. Chalrman King opened the public hearing. Mr M. Dawson, architect representing the applicant, stated his willingness to respond to any questions. Commissioner ::tout asked what kind of fencing would be used on the perimeter of this project. ttr. Lawson replied that it trill be a masonry fenca at a height of between 5 -6 fact Coelssioner Stout usaed if there are any plans to plaster the fence. 14 Dawson replied that no particular thought has been given to that. Commissioner Stout asked if there is any plan to do something between the entry to the project and 19th Street in the are* of landscaping. Mr. Dawson explained what it; proposed. Mr. Coleman stated that there will be trees along the five -foot planter. Mr. Dawaon atated that their concept plan addresses the tree pattern and pointed out that they show 384 trees which is approximately 90 trees per acre, considerably more thin what 13 required. Further, that they had reviewed the staff report and see no problem in complying with the condition relative to trees Chairman King stated that as it relates to the portion abutting 19th Street and coxing down, given the fact that we are dealing with a five -foot landscape border between the driveway on the north and the abutting property owner, would there be any problem with the idea of on the lower three buildings, eacn containing throe units, knocking one unit off of each so that a larger ar -a could be created in what appears to be a tight corridor. Planning Commission Minutes -8- December 8, 1982 W, Yr. Dawson replied that they are approximately 9 units per acre on that aide rs and they have been pretty geneus with the landscaping elament to the vest • and that five feet is pretty heavily landscaped. _ Chaircan Ung asked what the distance is to the property line on the second building to the north. 14. Getxz replied that it is 17 feet from the comer. Vr. Dawson stated that one reason for the generous setback and landscaping is for a greenway area and pedestrian circulation between the oecond and third buildings wing off the driveway going vest and linking up with the open space area. Commissioner Stout asked if the black caterial is the proposed roof aterial. Vr. Dawson replied that it is. Co3le3ionet Stout asked wbat It is and what it will be. Yr. Dawson replied that it is A co=Position shingle of the 300 pound category, Cooiasloner Stout asked if it will come In aquares or in eheats. It% Dawson replied that it will be in pieces and is a conatroetton standard comptsitlon. Co=aisrioner Stout stated that his concern Is for the surraAnding residents who will .mty Be* the roof lines. Vr, Dawson replied that they will also see the trees above the roof lines. Cr =iasioner PAepel stated that the rdty0s requireaent is 50 trees per acre end they will be putting in 90. Yr. A.S. Wilkes, owner of the property to the east facing Acethyst, stated t. .t be had examined tho plans and felt, the project is well designed and expressed his approval. lie indicated that his only concern Is the black roof. W. NeI3 with, 9385 19th Street, expressed concern with the ponsible increase in traffic and Brix problems and stated that everyone within 310 feet lmd hecn contacted regarding thi property, alt!=gb he had not been. Ht asked what would be done about storz :rains. VP. Cmith ztatti later that th lived 500 ;cet frog th_9 property line. %r. Y.ike Htncock, 9206 Garden, expressed concern with school overcrowding and trsfflc pro.ler3, indicating that it MW takes 20 minutrs to cake a left turn on ihilmaa to go south at 5 in the afternoon. Yr. Hancock also expressed concern that arty people will buy the condos as an Investment and rent them out thereby risking the possibility that they would not be kept up by renters. + 2 Planning Co =laslon minutes -9- Dece=ber 8, 1982 113 Chairman King stated that in terms of flood control, if a negative Declaration were to be issued and this project approved, is them a requirement for atom drains along 19th Street. Chairman King explained that requirement for a school certification letter from Involved districts indicating that there is sufficient classroom space to house any children coming into the district as a result of the project. He indicated that the City will not issue building permits unless this certification is received. He advised those in the audience to contact the school district directly to voice their concern relativa to this projt.,. and any overcrowding that may result. Mrs. Lynn Simone, 9290 Garden Street, vas opposed to thin pr,jeet because their bedroom faces the street on which the proposed project will be built. Further, ane asked about setbacks, increased traffic genoratioa, and whether traffic signals are proposed. She asked if there is any way t:.t the developer could be forced to contribute fees to build schools. Mr. Halsey Saylor, resident across from Garden street, asked what the City•s zoning is for this area and whether there is a trend that everything around 19th Street would go into multiple family. He stated that the area has changed substantially since he first moved here some years ago and asked whether this area will ovtr go back to single family. Mr. Hopson stated that the zoning for a piece of property under State law has • to be consistent with the General Plan. Further, the Gemirsl Plan for this area states that it should be a highor density and it would not only take a zone charge but a General Plan change to the concept that the City has had for this piece of property. Mr. Rich poser, 6670 Hellman, stated he felt this is a gaud project in that it is land - locked and felt that condominiums or townhousoa would raise property values. Mrs. Simons asked if the trees will be outside or inside the developzent. Commissioner Rempel replied that they will be both outside and inside the development. Mrs. Simons asked if the two story buildings will be looking into their bedroom and back yard and stated that she should talk W the developer about this after the meeting ,'me. Fobecca poser, stated that she is in favor of this development because tiis is a higher and better land Sae with the freeway a reality for this free Sha felt that this is a gold plan. Pr. Dowson statCd that the doveluicr has paid a lot of fees and this is the cost of doing business Further, raplying to Mme. Simcns, he states thaL the closest building in the project will be 130 feet aw.,y from her hoed alon& ® Heilcnn Avenue and totbacks will probably be 175 feet away. Planning Commission Minutes -10- December 8, 1982 D4 r 143, Barbara t`COtisLd, stated that mis area is not prestigious and felt that th'.3 1s a ,y90d pm Jsst, MO fbrtbar stated tkst b0scovner3 M, the risk of ravlry a V49 s;orr aiACID family borne looking do= Into their yards and lhto their b44fOOZO the rame az cOOdOalniums, :tare being no further que3tlOnz Or comments, the pablie hearing was closed. C Aimvn tang Stated that be felt there was a tight 3queezo between the prv.Wt aid the erlvejay Conine,, along 19th Ltreet, Cxtlssloner Batter stated that the applicant has made a fair effort to clt32te this and bas already =dv some changes. Further, when you request 00", you get lOto density and what is being proposed is cospatlble with the srirrosfidlr}t era. I'r, 8erker utated that the site is not the best and the developer has done a lot with it, co=des LOrer F*ryll stated that the setbacks hava been moved along 19th Street A41 there 951/ be 59 feet bstseec the 9311 and the first unit which will be rrAdn difrerent than slngls family residential, Yurther, that when the prrPerty 0 t:w' Cut de"ICPS they will vast tO use a part of this driveway. Q:sirun ZIA6 stated that the one concert he has as be drives along 19th Ztraet is 717J will see a straight ebot of the driveway and there will a very nice bwffer bet9aen 19th ✓reet 4C6 the first units. However, from a visual OLandPDL'1t as YOU 1004 north there :s very little land3aping. CC --tsaiO"P StOUL stated trot along the came lines, when staff is looking at 1an131JPLv, they abould 100% at COVering the wail w.ttb some type of vine to :sz=s0 =A '.=Pact, 710 irdioted that this 9131 be a Long wail along 19Lh :treat and Something ohm '4 soften It because it it is covered it tends to sit;Wta the tarshaeza, 34. Co=ei 03- rJ that wbat has been mbmitted is conceptual and will be reflrad at a later tats, Comrissloner `✓.out Stated that the City apparently has no design standards for b1OC4 .0110 std stated biz concern regarding the lack of standards asking that 047 to addressed, 34, fig atatsd that this is aJD'eet to the rev. w and apprmal of the City ?Lanier prior to the issuance of building pereiz. COmceiszil. -Ir -Lout mated that his point 13 them are no standards. 31'. Graz sued If be was dia"zsLig more 3 concept of parkway walls that deal with street rront-Ws, In this case, be stated, you are only seeing the end, Or "A w8112 and when you anvo you will get a different, more oblLlue angle. Plar»Ing r ^aZlsZ14M 1ynrrte3 -11- December 8, 1982 115 G W COmaieelOner Becpol stated that a year or so ago he had tried to get some decorative block with vines Planted through the walls to break up the monotony He indicated that this would improve the appearance of the blo -A walls being considered Commissioner Stout stated that standards for block walls should be pursued. Mr. Gomez stated that the Commission should give same rAirer,tion in this regard to staff. Commissioner Barker stated that both of those should be considered as separate issues. Commissioner Stout stated that with regard to the roofing, he would like staff to look closely at the material and his personal preference would be some random shadow pattern to it because it detracts seriously from the eondominiu= project Mr. Vai, 'n replied that staff will definitely look at the roofing material. Chvi:ror King stated that there are two things that the Commission moat act .Pon One, whether the Planning Cnmmisslon wishes to approve the Planned Levelopment category and secondly, the resolution approving the tentative tract. Motion: loved by gompel, seconded by Stout, carried w.=imously, to adopt 8esolut_on No. 92 -111 approving the planned development. Motion: :roved by Stout, seconded by Bemyol, carriea unanimously to adopt Nesoluticn No. 82 -112, approving Tentative Tragic 12305, with the amend.-.ants that the design of the wall be examined along with the landscaping along the wall, and also that the roofing material and color be reviewed. F - O ^TTION,- USE PERMIT 92417 - LESLIE AND INFANTE - The establishment of an ., ? in the C -1 -T zone to he located at 9685 Base Line In the Base Line Villa Opping Center - APN 208- 031 -70. Dan Coleman, Assuclato P"r, reviewed the staff report. No stated th t the City Attorney has ,enuesteA 611' rlor to to aney, the applican. obtain a letter from the owner of e Dropo stipulating that there will not be th another arrade located within this chop center. Chairman King stated that somethine will also be d from the previous ar.ado applicant stating that he will not proceed. Nr. Coleman stated that this is a moot point since the building Ss�.11�g leased to someone also.'�� Planning Commission Minutes -12- December 8, 1982 w.: ORDINANCE NO. + % on, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 232 -34 b 54, LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF HELL14AN AVENUF, FROM R -3 TO R -3 /PO The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: A. That the Planning Comnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by 1,.-, recommends the rezoning of the property he -e .nafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said recommendation B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rezoning will have no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Ocrlaratlon filed nerein. SECTION 2: The following described real property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning mac is hereby amended according'y. Assessor's Parcel Number 201- 232 -34 & 54, approxima.ely 5.24 acres in size and located north of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue, 's hereby changed from R -3 (Multiple Family Residential) to R -3 /PD (Multiple Family Re0dential /Planned Development). PASSED, AP ?PUVEO, and ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: .:un 0. MikelS, Mayor ATTEST: j)7 ocK r1 LJ D BACKGROUND. The City has received a request from a g.oup of homeowners n the residential tract northwest of 6th Street and Archibald to consider a land use change and zone change for the area between 6th and 4th Streets, and between Hellman and Archibald Attached is a copy of the letter from residents in the surrounding area This area 1s shown on the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan as Industrial Park category and is known as Subarea 16 The City has considered this matter in and on lthe recently approved Faster two years agogo, , 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan Should the Council wish to consider this matter further, it vould be in keep ng with Council policy to direct this item to the Planning report Commission backfoto their the Council on itheirwith recomnendattiion at teTh that P roannissien should consider: (1) if there is reason t r e xamin matter of land use changes in this area: and (2) if so, appropriate land use changes should be considered. RECOMMENDATION:_ It is recommended that the City Council direct this matter to the Planning Commission For their consideration and report back to the City Council. Attachment l l �' 000 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIIONGA ac void / STAFF REPORT �P10 e[ Z 19:; DATE: January 19, 1983 TO Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF GEIIERAL PLAN AND CHANGE FOR TAPEN OZONEE IH Ueni(t � N U rAL LC AN H A SPTL L N r1 LJ D BACKGROUND. The City has received a request from a g.oup of homeowners n the residential tract northwest of 6th Street and Archibald to consider a land use change and zone change for the area between 6th and 4th Streets, and between Hellman and Archibald Attached is a copy of the letter from residents in the surrounding area This area 1s shown on the General Plan and Industrial Specific Plan as Industrial Park category and is known as Subarea 16 The City has considered this matter in and on lthe recently approved Faster two years agogo, , 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan Should the Council wish to consider this matter further, it vould be in keep ng with Council policy to direct this item to the Planning report Commission backfoto their the Council on itheirwith recomnendattiion at teTh that P roannissien should consider: (1) if there is reason t r e xamin matter of land use changes in this area: and (2) if so, appropriate land use changes should be considered. RECOMMENDATION:_ It is recommended that the City Council direct this matter to the Planning Commission For their consideration and report back to the City Council. Attachment l l �' 000 El Dec:e=ber 17, 1932 I `r Mayor lcn Mikels • ,��• :" Cit7 of Ranchc Cac'sacaga P. O. Box 8o� E2=cbO C==77DZa. Ca. 91730 Car P.a7or Xfkels- Our cooittee net ritb Rick Gcnez on Deeorber 7, 7982, regarding Scb- ez 16, and ve appreciated his ti=e and aesistanet• in 2=ftrIng sole of our questions. Bosever, we are hereby —Icing a fou=l request to you and the City Council, to change the present industrial park eestip-nation birt to its:Or -kgtaal zaning of 1os density single fsaily residential. 0= residentia: area has beem referred to as a 'ati -take bat, it evew't bave to be. se feel ttrat it is imperative to begin this change nos, and Platt this utter am the City Couaeil agenda for the seacmi meeting to Jazz -cry. 71e aPProxi =tely 1,000 residents just North of Sixth St. would be adversely affected by nap additional industrial r'2rk type derelapcent. 7e are already bordered on tso sides by businesses and totally enclosing us eWld only selre•,2tc as care ftm the rest of the city. It sees that we are not included in t-te area covered by the new high school, yossiLly due to O isolation frea the rest Of the city. 4e are concerned abut safety for oar cbildreo and traffic, since industrial parts typlully have a large auber of e=plm'ees per acre. We are also concerned about property 'alms, and •vitb residential property expanding South almg ilellmn bvenae is Ontario, it 1 along Fourtb Street, ve feel that residential deve2opoent is the only logs =l designataa for this t = developed parcel '.:any things have charged since the Easter Plan o_etings, The sPlst vote on this Jnlustrial park zoning by bra -b t:e Planaime Ccmisaton and C1..7 Coamell also indicates t»a: trey mete not sure that irdas.rial park =x the best anssrr. i. Vol on 1 Page 2. Mayor Jon. Mikels City of Rancho Ciicaaonga Therefore, wo ask for your help in changing thin back to some low density residential along Sixth, possibly trau- sitloning to higher denslt,. toward Fourth S small industrial park strip trcot, and a along Archibnl and Fourth This arrangement would be fair for us, since we all pur- chased our homus with the understanding that other homes would be built to the South New home buyers South of Sixth Street would then know what will be built next to them. Thank you for your assistance. WO will be glad to meet with you personally to discuss this further. Sincerely yours, 62t�A i3Ati , /dk cc. Lauren Wasserman, city Manager nick Gomez, City Planner - It ti 3 -_ �i 4) 0 rI L • CITY OF RANCH(, CUCAMONGA At1 MEMORANDUM fU C'� N 6 4. r O � fATi rC p 2 N U 1977 DATE: Jantary 14, 1983 IO: .Stl Council - City Manager FROM: Mart, Empey, Finance Direct SUBJECT: Finn mial System Computnr package Attached is n proposal from the Managment Service- Tnetltute (MSI) for a micro cocpuGtt nyetm designed to meet the a, self is needs of the Finance Department. tl.my questions heretofore unanswor td, such as Sdentlf !cation of spectf Sc equipment; and who will provide the ongoing maintenance, are addressed in ttiu proposal 'this proposal is on que in that MSI will guarantee the ystcci to the City. The proposal it nano unique in that it addresses the specific needs of the pinnace Department now, and in the future (S to 1) yturs). This does not mean the system should not be •sihaneed along the way, it probably will, but the )asie unit is powerful enough and ban the capacity to grow with the City fir some time to come When buying a new computer it to obvious that the most important factor is the extent of suppert we can expect after the consultant is gone, this proposal recoz®u.tds RCA, a well knotm company in the field of electronics, ttut has an office in Ontario The quesrlon arises to to why a micro computer rather 'bun a mini computer, or a malnftame computer Frankly, these are several rtasonc, (1) micro computers h vo all the power and storage capacity of miti computers; (2) micro computers are cheaper; (3) technological advances and enrrgles are bring directed toward rho micro computer field rather 0.1n mini's and mainframes Biggar is definitely not better. The price tag has ;;rose over the previous proposal for a .ovp-'o of good reasons (1) pinpointed actual prices of hardware hao brought the coat oa equipment Into clearer focus; (2) because the research of equipment relative to needs was done up front some costa were incurred by the .ansultant; (3) the implementation schedule forces us to introduce subsystems out of sequence Therofcre Implementation will take longer than if we had started say in September or even October Ono interesting comment by a computer system analyst, whom we invited to review the proposal and comment on its content, indicated that proposed price was an excellent price and that MII apparently was absorbing a Breit deal of the development costa. I 0 City Council - City Manager January 14, 1983 Page 2 • Why is MSI buying the equipment and not the City? Obviously MSI knows morn about hardware than City sthff, also. MSI progra ®ere will be able to better Identify hardware that w!ll meet specific City needs. Finally, it is chwper for them to do it than us. With HSI making the actual purchase they elimin- ate the sales force cost, and certain storage overhead MST will merely buy it direct nick it up and deliver to the City once the programs are working. The proposed System 18 Capable of expanalon up to six stations at $800.00 per Station (current price). Built in grovtl is essential to develop internal flexibility and auditing control In reviewing HSI ae the consultant and developer of the system we have found that they are able to Analyze our specific needs, they know the computer business, and have the ability to successfully integrate the two. Mr. Ayers, President and founder of HSI is wall known and respected in local government and has demonstrated excellent foresight and responses to changes in the area of Governmental Finance, Administration and Personnel. COST ANALYSIS Identified Costa: Implementation coats: Software $44,790 00 Hardwara 23,998.00 Word file processing 9.300.00 TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION (contract) $78,088 00 Enhnncmmts: (optional) Acoustical equipment $ 540 GO Fame /Envelope feeder 1,105 00 Networking all computers 4,500 00 Forms reader for rapid imput 11.000.00 of coded or typed data $17,145.00 Miscellaneous costs: Manual 6 Documentation (Disk) -0- Bard Copy $1,500.00 Nardwure Maintenance 3,949.00 (RCA contract) In house support @ City 1.252.00 overhead rate (12 44%) S 6,701.00 TOTAL COST $101,934.00 dal t� Y City Council - City Manager January 14, 1983 Page 3 a' i This represents those costs that are identifiable with this project Fortunntcly, many items are optional The Recommendation is for the following: System Cost: Software Design b DeVIlLpment $44,790.00 Hardware 23,998 00 i, *Nord file Processing 9,300_00 ii $78,088.00 Enhancements: Furms /Envelopo Feeder $1,105 1,105 00 Miscellaneous Costs: Maintenance Contract $3,949.00 3.949.00 #, • Recommended Syetm Coate S83y142.00 These costs compure with our current ongoing costa. Keeping in mind that 'i $79.193 00 1s a one time implementation cost and that our ongoing operation costa will be reJuced significantly :i ONGOING 6 IMFLEMUTATION CWT ANALYSIS F. Proposed Current 4 Ongoing Cumulative Difference Favorable (unfavorable) Cr 1982 -83 $83,142 $49,193 ($33,949) 1987 -84 12,500 51,653 5,204 1984 -85 13,125 54,235 46,314 1985 -86 13,781 56,947 89,480 1986 -87 14,470 59,794 134,804 The average annual increase 1s based on a modest Inflationary increase of 5%. j; consistent with today's economic pica re Most coat increases will be due to material 6 supply costa mainly, with soma cost increases to equlpme onhanceme it The analysis shown on a linear basis that it is conceiva,le i� that the City will save wall mover 5100,000 in five years in ongoing computer costs Whether it 1s $100,000 or not, the savings al,ould still be significant Also note tlwt sometime during the ascend year of operation, Initial Computer qi( costa will have been recovered 4t "A. .rt City Council - City Manager January 14, 1903 page 4 It is fait that it is necSasary to point out that another option to the word file processing is a leaser system using the teletype printer. The initial cost would be reduced by 97,300.00. However, St In not recommenled to utilize this aporoach as it limits growth capabilities, and frankly, the teletype printer is not letter quality. The toletype printer is a heavy duty printer and is designed for production work in he area of payroll chat", warrants, financial reports, and is suggest d to us in the form of upper case only. Finance does have need for let-or quality capabilities rich as business license renewal forme and latto•a, purchasing correspondence, and budget format and preparation. Also, should it be doslred, we would like to maintain the capability o` b..1ng able to hardware Into whatever data is utilized by Administraticn /Personnel for the purposes of inquiry by that Department into our Perscnnel b Pirance records, without the ability of cnanging any informatlou Funding Currently the Redavdlopment Agency Board has already authorised 1/3 funding. It is recowended that the additional funding come from the Assessment histrict(s), 1/2; and the balance WO from the General Fu:,d Rooetves. It e felt that, inasmuch as the RDA and the Assessment District(d) require special accounting and banking, they should pay part of the freight. &,commendation It is recommend.,d that City Council approve the attached proposal and authorize tht balance of the necoses:y lending. MJ1 /wa u 0 1�s . -r )A4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT S , DATE: January 19,-1983 s TO: Memhers of the City Council FRDY: Jack Lam, Community Development Director BY: Tim J. Berdle, Senier Planner SUBJECT: APPLICATI0N To CALIFORNIA STATE ALLOCATION CLN MEE FOR AN ALLOCATION OF BOND W BACKGROUND: The California State Bond Allocation Comaittee has adopted a procedure which requires that the City and the Redevelopment Agency do certain things in order to be eligible to receive the bond allocation. These include completion of an agreement wrtth participating developers, adoption of a Resolution from the City authorizing application to the Mortgage Bond Committee, and certification that the City has on hand one -half of one percent as a deposit for the bond request amount. The City Council is authorized to submit an application request to the Mortgage Bond Committee. Attached to this report is a Resolution of the ® City Council which would authorize the application request. This Resolution provides the following: 1. The City make an application to the Mortgage Rand Allocation Committee. 2. The bond request is being reduced from the origiml 166 Million to the total created by the participating developers requested amount on' 545.2 Million. 3. The City Manager certifies that the City has an deposit one -half of one percent of the bond request. (Attached to Resolution is form for certification to LYe Bond Allocation Committee.) The City staff met with participating developers and the consultants, Thursday, January 13, 1983. following the cost recent meet'ng of the Bond Allocation Committee. Among the topics discussed, was the possibility of waiting until after• April 1, 1983 to apply. Apparently, allocations made by the Bond Allocation Committee after April 1. 1983 will not have the income restrictions on the use of Mortgage Bond money. The developer's reason that this deletion would be .- Ivantagems to their projects. From discussion with the Bond Allocation Committee earlier in the week, it appears that there may be additional allocations being made sfter April. At this time it is uncertain how much, if any, ® will be available for allocation. The disadvantage of waiting until )A4 11 after April, 1s the risk that there won't be any allocation available for RancF* Cucamonga at that tire. The participating developers will be submitting tt.elr program deposit agreements with final information requests on lionday. January 17. They will Indicate at that time which filing date they wish to participate fn. The change of the filing da'3 will not affect the receipt of the program deposit and the City's ability to cover all non - contingent costs. These costs will be paid through the money that the City is already receiving with the executed program depost agreements. The Resolution of the City Council and the Resolution previously approved by the Redevelopment Agency, along with the certification from Zband Manager, will be delivered to the Bond Allocation Committee by our bond counsel prier to the filing date of 5 p.m., January 21. 1983. In February, the Bond Allocation Committee will then make the allocation to all eligible cities remafi,ing on the allocation request list. RECOVENDATION: It IS recommendid that the City Council app�svo the attached so utfon authorizing application before the Mortgaod Bond Allocation Committee. Ryspectf 1 submitted, Cemamr ity Otvelopocn mrecc JL:TJB:jr Attachments: Approving Resolution Certification Regarding Notice to Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee. 10 e. 0 RESOLIFTIOA W. 83 -14 A 2MUTIM OF THE CITY CMIL OF TIE CITY Of RAXW OX,WOZA, CkIFMIA, AlJT;ID,lI21NG APPLICATION FOR AtIzCATIOn OF A MUGM SUBSIDY OW, C01FIRNING rILIHG OF WTICE OF SALE VITH T'i1E WkTGAGf M ALLOCATION C"ITTEf AW TK OTHER PATTERS MITING THERETO The City Council of the City of Randuo Cucamonga, Califurnia has resolved as follows: W -RCAS, tux legislature of the State cf California has, pursuant to Chapter 8 (cacencang with Section 33750) of Part 1 of Division 24 of the Califarnia Health and Safety Code 4.he 'Act'), authorized redevelopment agencies to porcba.e longterm low-interest rate loans to finance new residential construction In redevelopment project areas in order to encuarage nir�estaant within utd to upgrade such areas and has authorized such agencies to issue revenue bonds to finance the purchase of such loans; and WEPSA5, parsuan'- to the Act, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the •Agancy') proposes to undertake a fio,-tgagt Loan Financing Frogmen (the progr=e) to purchase loans (tne •Hortgage Loans°) merle to financo new single- uaally a4mr- ocavpted residential twits (the 'Residences•) to be constructed crfthfn its ktndro Redevelopment Project Area (the 'Project Area•) and to issaa Residential Vartgage Revenue Bond (the 'Bonds') to (inirce Um purchase of tet 'trtgage Loans; and wiIT,REAS, to obtain an allocation to issue the Bonds within the rederally fxposed )fait upon the issuance of mortgage subsidy bonds, the City of Rancho Gxanongs an August 31. 1432, caused to b! filed, pursuant to thn Costa-Kirks wusfrg Bad Allocation Act of 1231, as atended (the 'Costa -Narks Act' ), a nstiu. of sale of W.M.OW principal tanoait of the Bonds with the State Hortgage Bond Alloestiai Conaittee, which allocation Is now pendinl before the Catsittee; and "REAS, in Order for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain its position for allocations in Ig?3 on the listing of local entities which have filed such notices, the Horosr Cad Allocation Cumlttee requires that this City Council adept a resolution authorizing the described allocation and confirming the filing of the notice of sale of the £<utds with the fiortgagt good Allocation Comafttee, and 'dfEw, in order for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to aafnsafn its position co the listing for allocations in 1983, the Portgage Bond Allocation Ccavaittee also requfres that the City cause evfdencr of the deposit of :nn amount of aoney or. In lieu thereof, of a letter of credit, securfnq such amount, wsfch amount shall be subject to forfeiture and application by the City to assist housfng for persons of low and uvderatn income within the City Wan the failure to sell aay or only a potion of the Sands; and ) dJp Resolution No. 83 -14 Page 2 WHEREAS, certain developers desire to provide a pro rata portion of the deposit required to be made in order for the City to maintain its position on the listing for allocations in 1903, such deposit to be subject to the terns and conditions described in Program Deposit Agreements between sucn developers and the Agency. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED and ORDERE4 as 1. The application to the State Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee for an allocation for the Bonds under the Costa -Marks Act is hereby authorized and approved. 2. The notice of sale of S66.00D.000 principal amount of such Bond filed with the Mortgage Bond Allocatio, Committee on August 31, 1982, is hereby confirmed. 3. At such time as the developers shall have canplied with the deposit requiremeits of the respective Program Deposit Agreements, the C;ty Manager shall cause to be delivered to the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee a certified copy cf this resolution, together with a certificate signed by the City Manager substantially to the effect that the City has on deposit in an interest- bearing trust account and /or has on deposit a letter of credit In an amount which equa s 1/2 of 1% of the priniclpal amount of the Bonds requested for allocation and that the City wishes the notice of request for allocation to be deemed delivered by the Mortgage Bond Allocation Comnittee as of 1983, such certificate to be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 'A• and hereby made a part hereof. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 19th day of January, 1983. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman. City er Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor IA% 0 e Resolution No. 83 -14 Page 3 EXHIBIT 'A" CERTIFICATION REGARDING NOTICE TO THE MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies to the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee pursuant to the requirements of Section 50191 of the Costa -Marks Housing Bond Allocation Act of 1981 (the "Costn -Marks Act "), as follows: 1 The City did on August 31, 1982, request the Mortgage Bond Allocation Committee to grant to the City an allocation of mortgage subsidy bonds, which request is hereby reduced to a dollar amount of S 2. The City has on deposit in an interest bearing trust account and /or there is a letter of credit posted with the City in a total amount equal to 1/2 of 1 percent of the dollar amount set forth in paragraph 1 hereof, which deposit is subject to the forfeiture provisions of the Costa - Marks Act. 3. The City wishes its prior notice to the Committee to be deemed accepted as of 1983. 4. The undersigned City Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamongd has been duly autnorized and directed to execute and deliver this Certification pursuant to resolution of the City duly adopted on January 19, 1903. A certified copy of said resolution accompanies this Certification. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By auren t , asserman, ty t ana9er DATE: January 19, 1983 KI 1 �� n fa . ti January Ur, 1983 To -'hoc It "a' Concsrn; In regard to the FIXIN6D D : /E3,oriim 82 -05 - TT;nTIVE TR,',T. 1230;- ROY •• for the development of 59 condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, c� t of !!e1Lsn Avenue - AF717 21^,- 232 -34 and 54. -e are the surrounding eeighbors of the development of cor,coniniucs and were wondering if the run off of rater from Pellcan wou.d be taken care of with the etorm drain that will ue put in. The north side of the street fillc up with water, t:cs it startu running down the Louth aide. ,'e'v- had garages and nouses flooded. Ir, the widen , of the street are they planning to use dust the land that is owned by the State or buy some from the people. :f they plan on buying land will they buy from both aides of the ctraet' �7c or, the south eide do not want to be the only ones to looce our land. recausi if we ever decide to sell we wovldn't Cat the full value for our land. °he Zanrosso's are riot in favor of widening the road any -Are then w'.rtt the State owns, because the use of their front yard is for turning around in. Their back yard in not big enough to turn around in. ^.he traffic along 19th Street in now pretty heavy at twos. Yen with the road being widened and a turn in for the condominijms the traffic rill be such heavier. The children who have to crows the street for school in the mornings will have a harder time. "ost of the neigbtors had already stated their concerns at the meeting. �5 0 SlneerelYr G -MLO caevv ■ /983 m `ynrnne� el" = ec- RECEIVED CI1y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTRATION JAN 17 195j 7 tCIn19�iZ111�4i9�� 8 4 gi73 a ,, .lave c floe 2 �� 1C -L A .O.�m- 2 .Qtin2c -ldti ��libo-2lCZ' �Y��v{ '%112, C t U � I 0 g>5�3y�3 6649 Hellman Alta Loma. Calif. 52%41 January 17, 1988 The Rancho Cucamonga City Council 932v Baselint Road Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 Dear City Council Elembera, RE, Planned Development 82 -05 - Tentative Tract 12305 - ROT I am writting this letter on behave of my parents Vernon and June Braehear. They reside at the above address, But are out of town at this time and ask me to write you in support of the above mentioned change. They have seen the above mentioned plans for 59 condominium unite and feel that It will be good use of acreage. We hope that on January 19, 1982 when you hold your meeting you will approve the change to R -)/PD. Sincerely yours, � f w,J U Vc'-O- . Jean B. Vieeu, for Vernon and June Braehear r. 0EPiRIVED CITY OF NH0�1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA MINIS ATIC ADMINISTRATION JA 21/19, JAN In ;4-• B AM �tBlfl,tl,ll,Yl,1,2,9i9i5j „i � G Q CITY OF RANCHO CUCA,MONGA MEMORANDMA DATE January 19, 1983 TO: Member, of the Planning Commission FROM: Michael airin, Senior Pla "it SUBJECT: TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY STAFF REPORT Attache' please find a copy of the Staff Report for Terra Vista Planned Comnuni . which is part of the January 26, 1983 Planning Commission Agenda. This report is being distributed prior to distribution of the agenda packet to allow you enough time to adeo,tely review the material and should be brought to the meeting with your agenda packet If jou have any Questions or comnents, please feel free to contact me at any time. MJ:jr Rtta,hment: Planning Commission Staff Repor: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 26, 1983 TO: Mlmmbers of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PLANNED CO%SIUNITY 81 -01 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - Tev ew and final consideration o the Terra Vista Planned Community text and final Environmental Impact Report. The project consists of approximately 1300 acres and is bounded by Base Line and Foothill Boulevard on th- north and south, and by Rochester and Heven on the cast and west. SUMMARY: After many Pehllc hearings, workshops, and months of work by the Planning Commission, staff and applicant, the final Terra Vista Planned Community text and Environmental Impact Report have been completed for your final review and consideration. It is intended that this meeting will provide a forum for receiving final comments on the Planned Community text for the purpose of making a final racca.nendation to the City Council. During the General Plan preparations, it was determined that the land contained within the Terra Vista Planned Community, as well as the Victoria Planned Community area, should be planned for the development of a comprehensively planned community that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations As a result, a planned community ordnance was developed which Is oriented around the theme of superior development was adopted by the City Council. During the development of the Terra Vista Planned Community it has been the intent of all parties involved to establisl a document which would provide the neces: y regulations end guideli mes for the development of a superior community. This report is formated into three basic sections: 1 A summary of past Cornisssion actions as it relates to the new plan; 2 an analysis and review of the revised text and areas which staff is recommending further consideration by the Planning Commission; and, 3. a summary review of the final Environmental Impact Report. Planned Community 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 2 Staff has prepareu this report and recommendations in a style that would allow the Planning Commission to take action this evening by making appropriate recommendations to the City Council. Staff has provided a Resolution recommending certification of the final Environmental Impact Report and approval of the Planned Community text with conditions. S'ih.NART OP PAST COWIISSION ACTIONS: In a review of the work the Commission has ee bn doing over the last several months, we have provided the following summary of the major topics that the Planning Commission has discussed and asked the appliccnt to resolve. 1. Or anizatlon of text and iLse of�gr�a hhiics - Early In the review process, the P ann ng Commtss oni requested the applicant to reorganize some of the sections to the plan which would more fully describe each of the elements and provide a clear progression of the concepts. In addition, the Commission stressed the use of graphics wherever possible to indi -ate tnemes and concepts to support the written descriptions. The applicant has accomplished this through the revised text. 2. Residential uonsit - Oriylnally, the applicant's draft plan indicate approx mate y 8,700 dwelling units within the Planned Community area The Commission reduced the amount of dwellings to 8,000 maximum with a potentiai for a 1,000 unit density bonus as an incentive to provide affordable housing The anollcant has revised the land use plan to conform with the Commission's decision on the residential maximum density and has prepared a density distribution plan which indicates the potential distribution of those units. 3 Residential Dest n Guidelines - The Planning Commission expressed F0 concern over the development of detailed design guidelines for residential development. The Commission asked for more detail with regard to soiar, wall treatments, fencing, and other details regarding buffering and transition between densities, as Bell as guidelines on various design techniques that can be used for residential development. The revised text was substantially changed to incorporate guidelines for design techniques that will create ri vaation and superior development. 4. Commercial Land Use - The Planning Commission spent a considerable amount OT t-Ne—w-TiF regard to the location of neighborhood centers and the mix of uses that will be permitted within each of the commercial designations. The latest revised land use plan, as well as the text, ir,corporates the Planning Commission's desires for the location of neighborhood centers and contains a rigid list of land uses which are permitted within each of the commercial categories. Planned Community 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 3 5. Foothill Boulevard Des1 n Con�te�t - The Planning Comrission's main concern or the oothi Boulevard frontage of the Terra Vista Planned Community was to create an image that would not promote a strip commercial atmosphere, but rather groups of uses which would provide a functional relationship to one another and which would promote center development. Also, the Commission was concerned with the physical development of the corridor as it relates to the Foothill Boulevard scene and the design goals of the General Plan In response to the Commission's concerns, the applicant has developed additional graphics for the Foothill Boulevard corridor and a rigid set of land uses that will be permitted within each of the land use categories of that corridor. Part of that physical development relates to the development standards which are developed within the text. The setback regulations as they are presently shown in requiring a less than n other places along Foothill B ulevard Commission detailed analysis and recommendation on this matter is found in the next section under commercial setbacks on Special Boulevards. Greenway Desion Conce t - The Commission's major concern for the greenway was its implementation as well as the development of conceptual design guidelines for the actual pathway design, plant materials, and other design features as they relate to adjacent neighborhoods and open spaces. The text has been revised to respond to these issues by providing additional graphics showing design techniques for the various types of trails provided throughout the plan. In addition, the iz,.lcmentation section of the planned community discusses the concepts for the implementation of the greenway along with the open spaces. Park Plan - The major issues of the park plan centered around Pr vate open space credit, the park /detention credit and design, and park implementation. Previously, the Planning Commission decided As the Commissi nplis aware enew State legislation hasebesnaadopted which requires less par" dedication than previously used in the development of tho original plan. Therefore, the park plan has been redesigned to accommodate the new law. The Commission also decided that the joint use of some of the parks for a flood detention facility could receive 100 percent credit based upon the data provided which showed a nomin,.l use of the park for flood detention purposes. The method of park implementation is discussed within the implementation section of the planned ccnmunity text. In addition to the concepts outlined in the text, the applicant has proposed the development of a detailed implementation plan that would be developed as an addendum to the planned cormunity text after adoption of the text and prior to approval of the first final maps within the planned community. Planned Community 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 4 B. Landsca a Guidelines - The Planning Commission requested that andscape gu de nes be developed which would comprehensively discuss the landscaping design guidelines and techniques that will occur throughout the community. Some of the design solutions, as well as setback requirements that were listed in the draft text, were not acceptable to the Planning Commission and the Comidsslcn requested that they be revised to be consistent with General Plan standards. in particular, the Commission asked for more e.etails on the Milliken Avenue corridor, the use of six foot walls be explained more fully, and other alternatives be discussed such as berming, side on cul -de -sacs and increased setbacks. While the applicant has made revisions to the landscape guidelines, there are still areas where staff feels revisions would be needed to remain consistent with General Plan standards and address the concerns that the Planning Comaission originally addressed. These are discussed in both items one and two under the analysis section. ANALYSIS OF REVISED TEXT: Based upon review of the Planning omm es on s act ons and directions. staff has reviewed the proposed text and has outlined the following areas which warrant further discussion on potential changes for final adoption 1. Commercial Setbacks on Special Boulevards - The setback standards proposed n•ithin the text or commercia and office uses are not consist it with the General Plan standards and guidelines This was previo. , y discussed by the Planning Commission and they requested the standards be revised to be in substantial compliance with he General Plan standards. This 1s is particularly important along the Haven, Base Line, Milliken, and Foothill Boulevard corridors in order to maintain consistency with development throughout the rest Of the City. The planned community text, pages IV -4 and 5, indicate the parking will be set back from the curb a minimum of 19 feet with an average setback of 30 feet, and buildings 4111 be set back from the curb a minimum of 30 feet and an average of 45. The General Plan requires a minimum 30 foot building setback from the street right -of -way on both sides of any Special Boulevard and an average minimum depth of landscaping of 30 feet from the ultimate street right -of -way and in no case less than 15 feet from the ultimate street right -of -way. The planned community standards are measured from the face of curb which includes a 13 to 15 foot parkway area. Therefore, buildings will be located to within 15 feet of the property line, which is 50 percent less than the General Plan standards Likewise, the minimum 19 foot parking setback would be as close as 4 to f feet from the property line, which leaves little area for beading aid landscaping Since the General Plan requires a miniancm average deoth of 30 feet of landscaping from the street right -of -way line and in no case less than 15 feet, staff would suggest that the Planned community standards be revised as follows: Planned Community 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 5 1. Parking Area - Parking areas should be set back an average minimum doPth of 431 feet from the face of the curb, and in no case shall be located closer than 28t feet to the face of the curb. 2. Building Setback - Buildings shall be set back at a minimum average of 43 feet from the face of the curb and shall be no closer than 38 feet from the face of the curb. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended tha the cocmercial setback standards on ..pee a ou evards throughout the planned community be revised to the above dimensions. COMMISSION ACTION. 2. Residential Setbacks on Special Boulevards - Section IV, prges 4, 5, and 7, of the planned Community text discusses setbacks for residential developments along major and special boulevard:. The setbacks discussed in the text set standards for the locaticn of 6 foot wails and the location of buildings based upon detac'ed or attached units. Again, the Terra Vista standard is incon•:istent with the General Plan standard for setbacks on Special Boulevards. The General Plan polices in the Design Element for the rmadway system discusses that setback and landscape requirements develop the character which 1s needed to identify the function for each of the designated streets. The Special Boulevards have been desi;nited as Special Boulevards to create a major statement with regcrrl to the scale of the street versus the scale of buildings and their setbacks. Staff's concern is thet many streets throughout Terra Vista will be faced with wall conditions set back a minlmum of 13 feet from the face of the curb. Homes would only be placed a minimum of 20 feet from the property line in a detached situation and 24 feet in a multiple family deveiopment. It was not the intent of the General plan to create a differentiation between setbacks oil multiple units versus single family units. A series of single family units on small lots of approximately 30 to 35 feet wide would create as much building bulk as clustered multiple family units, which usually have greater separation and setbacks. Therefore, it is as important to create a setback for single family detached units as it is for clustered multiple family units, in Section IV page 7 of the planned community text, the graphic indicates solid walls will only be used in a few locations. however, this can be misleading as single family detached units can also be built within the medium category, which would then require some solid walls. It has been the Commission's policy to date to discourage the use of solid walls along the right -of -nays through the use of side on cul -de -sacs or by creating greater setbacks to the walls. Planned Conmanity 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Pag: 6 RECOMMENDATION: Given the above analysis, staff recommends that the o�lT ngt setbacks for Special Boulevards he adapted for the Terra Vista Planned Coaminity. I. Building Setbacks - Buildings shall be set back at 3n average minimum depth of 43 feet from the face of the curb and no less than 38 feet from the face of the curb. 2. Walls - The use of walls shall be discouraged wherever possible through the use of side on cul-de -sacs, berming, landscaping, or building ^tbacks or orientation. Where walls are needed for single family detacted units, they shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the face of the curb. Where walls are needed for clustered multiple family units, they shall be set back a minimum of 28 feet from the face of the curb. COMMISSION ACTION: 3. Residential Oeve to vent Standards and Format - The residential stanoards are contained within ection V. beginning on page 3 and continuing to page 19. It is important that these standards b� easily understood for ease of implementation dur!ng the review of tentative tract maps. Staff asked the applicant to develop land use and setback matrixes for the residential categories and eliminate the mass of verbage which only tends to confuse the matter. The applicant has developed a matrix for these categories, but a significant -mount of verbage still exist which Is a repetitious. The present format makes It cumbersome to read in order to determine which requirments may apply in a given circumstance. Reformating of this section will assist in making the provisions more clearly understood. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Commission request the app c..nt re ormat the standards into a use matrix for all of the residential categories and two site development standard matrixes, one for the luw medium and mediva category and another for the medium high to big-' category. COMMISSIO ACTION: Planned Community 81 -01 /Lewis Planning Commission Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 7 Park Implementation - The parks and open space implementation sections begin in .. -ction VI, page 2 and continues to page 9. Thic section contains a discussion on the applicable law, the provisions for meeting the park requirements credit for private open space, and the objectives of the park implementation system. While the text within the first section under °Applicable Law and Park Plan" is informative and discusses the history on the development of the implement it implementation plant As such, 1t should be applicable removed from the text• It would be more effective to begin the park section with the section labeled "Provisions for Meeting Park Requirements" and the use of the chart on page VI -3 The park plan has been developed under the new State law park bill, and would require a minirwm park requirement of 55.8 acres based on the population projections of Terra Vista The Terra Vista park plan proposes to provide 42.6 acres of tnat amoort within public parks, greenways, and trails. It 1s intended that the remaining 13.2 acres would be rese:ved for potential credit for the development of private open space in accordance with tho quidelines for private open space credit Of the total park requirement, approximately 77 percent is being provided in public open space areas with the potential for the remainder being given towards private credit open space. Previously, the Col mission had Aiscussed with the applicant approximately a 60140 split between publi' and private open space. In light of the significant reduction of the Public open space from 'he previous plan, the Commission may want to consider whether the present ratio of public vrrsus private is an appropriate amount. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the text beginning in Section VI page 2 through page 4 under the section entitled "Applicable Law and Park Plan' be eliminated in its entirety CO ?MISSICN ACTION: Affordable Housing - In Section VI beginning on page 11 and continuing through page 15, the affordable housing criteria and guidelines are discussed. The goal of the plan is to provide 15 percent or more of the dwellings within Terra Vista at afferdable levels to low and moderate income families. Further, to provide one -third each of the dwellings to be within each of the affordable ranges. Staff has a concern that s(,me of the language within the text indicates that the applicant can only provide affordable Planned Ccommisst commission 81-01/Lewis Agenda Planning January 26, 1983 Page 8 housing in the event that the city entities them certain prbgrafns. While it is obvious that housing spnog essential tnat assiist fn Providing affordable housing, it every affordable project which TTherefore, somevofeSthea language granted one of these programs discuss the availability of these to programs ono the potential rfor density bonuses Staff would ai:n like to see a clear leastaae minimum toe he text percent ach owhich indicates a goal of p eg affordable units within each one of the four major neighborhoods in the planned distrihutfbn of affordable housing. General Plan housing At the end of this section, the plan discusses inequitable subsidies that such and how they may be avoided. The plan s trying to means without windfall profits can be avoided simply through private involvement by local government through resale prog rams. Rancho Cucamonga has not yet developed its entire housing program, nor has there been established for eliminating tng windfall profits f ono the l resale of affordable units The text is precluding what Rancho Cucamonga may do in the future. RECO'I AT ION: Rased upon the above analysis. tie following is recommended: 1 That the language discussing available affordab'e programs and their entitlements be partially amended and eliminated it 2. provides at eleastb fifteen included ( 15) a pe cent taffordable housiing to each of the four major neighborhoods of the planned community. 3. That the discussion on control of windfall profits be eliminated. c6YMi5S1 ACTION: a2T Planned Cc.M lity 81 -OS /Lewis Planning Come -,Sion Agenda January 26, 1983 Page 7 Park Implementation - The parks and open space implementation sections begin in Section VI, page 2 and continues to page 9. This section contains a discussion on the applic.ble law, the provisions for meeting the park requirements, credit for private open space, and the objectives of the park implementation system. While the text within the first section under "Applicable Law and Park Plan" is informati• a and discusses the history on the development of the implement it Implementation plant As such, it should be removed from the texts It would be more effective to begin the park section with the section labeled "Provisions for Meeting Park Requirements" and the use of the chart on page VI -3 The park plan has been developed under the new State law park bill, and would require a minimum park requirement o. 55.8 acres based on the population prrjections of Terra Vista. The Terra Vista park Plan proposes to provide 42.6 acres of that amount within public parks, greenways, and trails It is intended that the remaining 13 2 acres would be reserved for potential credit for the development of private open space in accordant, with the guidelines for private open space credit Of the total park requirement, approximately 77 percent is being provided in public open space areas with the potential for the remainder being given towards private credit open space Previously, the Commission had discussed with the applicant approximately a 60/40 split between public and Private open space In light of the significant reduction of the Public open space from the previous plan, the Commission may want to consider whether the present ratio of public versus private is an appropriate amount. RECOMEHDATION• It is recommended that the text beginning in Section VI Page 2 through page 4 andir the section entitled " Applirable iaw and Park Plan" be eliminated in its entirety. CONMISSI� pH ACTION: 5. Affordable Housin - In Section VI beginning on page 11 End cont main —T g tnrooy page 15, the affordable housing criteria aid guidelines are discussed. The goal of the plan is to provide 15 percent of more of the dwellings within Terra Vista at affordable levels to low and moderate income familles. Further, to provide. one -third each of the dwellings to be within each of the affordable ranges. Staff has a concern that some of the language within the text indicates that the applicant can only provide affordable 021( Planned Co m:m;nity 81_0t /Lew I Planning t /Lew Is nua y 2GCommis ion Agenda s pa9e 9, 198,, FINAL ENVIRof1MENTq� Sera as be °aut9 farmitigatfon which msur final responses Environmental to cor Impact an ld outfofh7erra d Vt lists the few for sede�aPamos. hastbeenmmomts and lnsenttalpompacts Ifrsunavofdable adnais °mnapYcof eshsa resupitEof full of can levels based in the rep adverse impacts In "gatlon measures ,t ma n PletlontY aehn eDeerdrologywejssut the ntwo most re P 9n cif itselfreview r The ear dt5° drain of Creek have b cant fss Inds age system Channel been re ues within the Terrd significant Terra Vista. with the cantered through the sect I a s1 signff {cants was found nthatcthe ens 1. The Af After furthrrnay av't�tidsn is stud Plan signff scant diffow it waste dfscoverwasr actually i9ures that wee u t of this tl signs- ereral plan °CQ7Ae traffic genera[ {onra Proposed ista was not the General than th overall of development ) ani Tern as Vis tandc which can cant bell, Which wduli assist pe tt Suatn sfgnffic of h' ante the 9 each Phase Owev ,hand been [[hest ghat wi llnnea lfm adverse as aresult of listed the condf unavoidable However 6y Id he Overr result It in Irvine f {eN gof uthf sere doctement Is Inc laded) ins the is Resolution den"Statement the staff nds that ument and to the a te9uacY ofQ has 6Y State lawn a° recommendation 9uately Prepared see received, all issues. As Y Council, port is requ ira d0tl addresses FINAL from the Planni certification addresses' conduct a PubENDAT,uN: It g C° scion Commis s;cn t hear n9 to receive recommendedInput that mm staff, concurs with eceive f at he p It would be the ffndl�gs frog Planning Commission recommends approval the t and analysis' public. If the certff{cat.on Of the Planned adopt the ttac as provided b the �s( 11 °f 'he final Env;rd commonitY text lwdthResolution which IIY :ruOmI t ted, nta� Impact R°port conditions the sClty °^ sUMEZ tY Planner 'MV:�r RESOLUTION No. * A RANCHO RESOLUTION OF THE PLAR41MG COMPASSION OF THE CITY OF OVAL OF PLANNED COMU ITY IONEINO. 81- 01RANDI CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL L;IVIROMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO THE CITY COUHCIL FOR THE TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY WHEREAS, an application and supporting documents have been filed for tie establishment of a Planned Community Zone for approximately 1321 acres generally located m.reee. Base Line and Foothill Boulevard on the north and south, and Rochester and Haven on the east and west; and WHEREAS, the 'tanning Commission has held several duly advertised public hearings pur;.ant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, Lhe Planning Commission has reviewed and considered all elements of the Proposed Plann d ed Community and the associated Impact Report. Environmental NOV, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does resolve as follows: SELTIOh 1: The Planning Commission recommends certification of adequacy for the final Environmental Impact Report to the City Council based on the following findings: I. The final Environmental Impact Report has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the State. and local EIR guidelines. 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained within the EIR prior to reco=ending approval of the project. SECTION 2: The Planning Commission recommends adoption of this statement of uverr ding considerations to the City Council: To the extent that the Planned Community allows the occurrence of significant effects identified in the final EIR without full mitigation the City Council has Identified specific economic, ecological, and social reasons to support its action wbich make infeasiole the project alternatives described in the final EIR or additional mitigation measures. The Planning Commission finds that facts supporting this finding are contained in the final EIR and the Planned Coamunity, text. Mitigation measures d and are intended to mitigateaoroavoid the significant environmental effects identified In the Resolution No. Page 2 final EIR. The Planned Community itself is a mitigation measure which 1s .intended to mitigate or avoid the significant environmental effects of revelopment which c(,*-,u otherwise occur without a plannen comprehensive approach such as the Planned Community standards, guidelines and regulations. SECTION 3. The Planning Commission recommends adoption of Planned Community y— Fo-781ZS1 to the City Council based on the following findings and recommended conditions, FINDINGS: 1. Cha..ges and alterations have been incorporated into the pr,ject which mitigates significant environmental effects to an acceptable level. 2. Tie Planned Community provides for the development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the zone that 1s superior to development otherwise allowed under alternate regulations. 3 The Planned Community provides for development within the zone in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. 4. The Planned Community provides for construction, Improvements, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required by development within the zone CONDITIONS 1. Prior to final approval of the first tract map in Terra Visa, a detailed parks and open space implementation plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the City Council. 2. Prior to consideration and approval of any development in Terra Vista, mitigation measures outlined in the final Environmental Impact Report shall be reviewed and considered. L 4+,r i �R dir r� @ r• S Resolution No Page 3 3. All flood control and drainage structures needed for each inJividual development shall be constructed by the developer. Adequate plans showing that each phase can be safely and properly drained shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to Issuance of building permits for that phase. 4. All traffic and circulation Improvements shall be designed and Installed by the developer at the direction of the City Engineer and as needed for each development phase. 5 Prior to final approval of any residential development, adequate capacity shall exist or will be provided at the time of development for public services such as schools, sewer treatment capacity, water availability, and police and fire protection and utilities. 6. Prior to f ,al approval of the first tract map, a landscape a ! lighting maintenance district shall be established tor Terra Vista. 7. The developer shall encourage and facilitate bus service and transit route, throughout Terra Vista as development occurs. Pr,grams such as ride sharing, previsions for park at.d ride facilities, bicycle lanes, vanpool programs, shall be considered. 8. As development phases occur, appropriate physical improvements shall be made by the developer for pedestrian and bicycle routes and transit facilities such as bus pullouts and waiting areas. 9. As each development phase occurs, berms, walls, building attenuation shall be provided to aaequately mitigate any potential noise Impacts. 10. The following standards and sections of the Planned Crnmunity text shall be revised as follows: A. Commercial setbacks on Special Boulevdrds: 1 Parking Area - Parking areas should be setbo:k an average minimum depth of 43 feet from the face of curb and in no rase shall be located closer than 28 feet to the face of curb. Resolution No. Page 4 2. Building Setback - Buildings shall be setback at a mintnua average of 43 feet from the face of curb and shall be no clnser than 38 feet from tl,e face of curb. B. Residential Setbacks on Special Boulevards: 1. Building Setbacks - Buildings shall be setback at an average minimum depth of 43 feet from the face of the curb and io less than '.i feet from the face of curb. 2. Walls - The use of walls shall be discouraged wherever possible through the use of side on cul -de -sacs, berming, landscaping or building setbacks and orientation. Where walls are needed for single family detached units, they shall bo setback a minimum of 20 feet from the face of the curb. Where walls are needse for clustered imi'tiple family units, they shall be setback a minimum of 28 feet frai the face of curt. C The format of the , identiol develoomen: standard section shall ae revised to elimtnale repitition and shall use matrixes for uses and standards. D. The text beginning in Section V1, page 2 through 4, under the subtitle "Appr' cable Lcw and Park Plan" shall be elimindted in its entirety. E. The Affordable Housing provisions conra.ned in Section V1, snall be revised as felle- r. The language discussing the use of affordable programs and entitlements, shall be partially eliminated and amended. 2 A statement shall he included that it is the goal to provide at least fifteen percent (15X) affordable housing in each of the 'cur major neighborhoods of the Funned community. Resolution ..o. Page 5 3. The GIscusslon on contro' of windfall profits shall be eliminated. 11. The above •equlred revision, shall he submitted to y and approval w thin Planner 30 idaysrfrom the aoaptlan review the City Council. The final adopted revised text shall be printed and submitted to the City Planner within 60 days from City C0unc11 approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TdIS 26TH DAY OF JAIIUARY, 1963. PLANNING COR MION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUUMNGA BY: effrey K nq. Cha rman ATTEST: ecretary o the P ann n? ommlsz on 1. JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamnn a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, at a re 9 ult- merting of the Planning Commr•slon Fxld on the 26th day of January, 1983, by the following vote-t--wit: AYES: COMi1SSIOUERS: NOES: COMIISSMNERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIO,IERS: r. ,'S CITY OF RANCF.O CL'CAMONGA Ly7CAAr(il^ MEMORANDUM January 17, 198:. To: City Council and City Manager Free: Bill Holley, Director, Commuolty, Services N.Mrtment Sub!ect Agenda Item 3 -L: Landcark Designation lf.D. Cousins House, a k a. the Christmas House On Thursday, January 6, 1983, the Historic Preservation .^.^mission held a propel .v notiesd and wdvertiaed public bearing for ti.e p +pose of form- ulating a recoamendation to the City Council on a Landmark designation for the Cousins House. On a motion by commissioner Cooper with a scconJ by Kilmirray, it was voted to recommend a landmark designation to the Council. The CorAlision further aided that it wished it knorin by the Council that the Commmission opposed relocating the Cousins Muse to the City of Ontario, prufer -zing it to remain in its present locntion within Raaeho Cucamonga. Staff =Je no reeozr4mdaticn on this ratter to the Commission and tarries the Commission recocomdation to Council .tthout cormeat. As a side note, several of the Presorvatim �' sieners will be in attendance at the Council meting to offot -'st ny, most notably, %ss Ada Cooper, who was associated with the County 6Weum Association at the time the house was turned over to the lbrrisons. B11/mw Minutes Rancho Cucamnn,la Historic Preservation Commissiun Regular Meeting Janutry 6, 1982 -7,00 p.m. Lions Park Community Center Meeting wall called to order by Chairman Strano at 706 p.m, Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance was led by Chat man Strolls. Pledge of Allegiance Present were Coami&nionars Strane, Hlckccx, Cooper and Kilmurray. Roll Call Absent, Commissioners Arner, Billings and White. Minutes of December 14, Regular Meeting, were revs wed, Wnutes 12/14/82 Motion, ?loved by Cooper, seconded by Kilmurray, Minutes of December 14, Aegular Meeting, be approved as posted. Motion carried 4 -0. (Absent. Arner, White and Billings.) Annou nceaonte Chairman Strane reported on the success of the npen [louse held at Was' House - the Rains' House on December 17. She reported there were 167 Open House people in attendance. Public Hearing - Cousins' House (Christmas Hasse) Christmas house Staff reported teat confimation of legal nocificationa concerning this Public Hearing for possible recommendation to City Council for designation as City Historic Landmark for the Christmas House has bean received. Commissioner Kilmurray reported on the several phone calls she had received concerning the history of the Christman House. Chairman Strane opened the P=jbllc Hearing. Laura Jones reported to Commission on her beliefs that the Christmas House should rea,in at its present location and be designated as a City 111etcrir Landmark. Ohe sail that this feeling had been expressed to her by other community residents also. There being no further comments, Chairman Strane closed the Public Ilea rl ng. Commissioner Kilmurray queationed the details of the sale of the house. Commdani.snar Cooper expl.ined that the house was given to the San Bernardino County Museum Association. They, in turn, sold the house to the current owners (the Morrleons) for $10,000 down with a balance due of approximately $60,000 with the provision that the Morrleons spend an additional amount for restoration of the house and that it be opened to the public ton day& a year Motion, Roved by Cooper, seconded by Kilmurray that the Cousins' House (Christmas House), located at 9240 Archibald Avenue, be recmmaanded to the City Council for desionwtiou as a City Historic Landmark. Notion carried 4 -0 AltSt Cooper, K11murray, Hlckcox and Strane. NOES, none. ABSENT, Billings, White and Arner. Commission discussed the historic significance of the house and the importance of the towe remaining in its present location. continued .. .4- notion, Moved by KSlmurray, seconded by Cooper that t`a City Council be notified that it in the recommendation of the Historic Proaervetion Commission that the Shristmas House remain on lee y present location. Motion carried 4 -0. Absent, Billings, White and Arner. Commission Items - Donated Material Motion, Moved by Cooper, seconded by KSlmurray, that the Alta Donated Material Lose Book, by Martem Stoebe, Mt Stoebe Billings and Wallace Starts, be recommended to the City Council for acceptance into the City Archives. Motion carried 4 -0. Absent, Billings, White and Arent. Mew Business Commissionor Cooper agggasted that pictures be taken if Guaatl Guastl Camp e2 Camp 12, located north of Foothi 1 Zoslevard. Staff said that could be arranged for next week, Commissioner Cooper to contact staff to act time and da-e. Staff reported that the City Canted had adopted the recommended Etivanda Cairns Resolution submitted by Ctamissifn designating the Etivanda Cairns a City Historic landmark. Nays, Mikela is to correspond with the University of California at ULrkelay and Cal Poly Pomona to request their assistance in obtaining any Information on the histuric •igaificanee of site. Further, Rick Gomez, City Planner resorted that the site nw falls under the protective covenants of the California Environmental Quality Act. Public Comment Jell Sceranka, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, was Christmas (louse present and wished to comment on his desire that the Chrivtmas Souse remain at its curre„t location. Notion, Moved by Hickcox, seconded by Cooper that meeting be Adjournment adjourned. Motion carried 4 -0. Absent, Billings, White and At ,er. Chairman Stream adjourned the meeting at 7335 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by, Nary Nhit ry Cmounity $:[vise! Department W 8 ! d ' 0 193 §ly y na$a' ..«...,.I.. ". ...... .... ... --- ....... - - -- AFFIDAVIT OF PUCLICATION STATE Of CALIPORMA !9 COUNTY OF SAN RERNAItDINO 1 L Lnarine P. Prnrn do hrreby certify that I nm fh. [,go) Advertising clerG of TH£ DAILY RFPORT. a dally newspaper of generul Oreulatlnn. published In the City of Ontario. County and Scale aforesaid and that the attached aoserlttement of Ilatfee of Pubtle UcorinC nfstnrir Preservnt /nn Carnlaslon for [„C Cur of Pcnr-hn CucanonOa was published In sold newspaper one (' I 11rr to wit Deeenbur '7r 17A2 ' cc -by under 17 rally of perjury thni file foregoing Is true and (SIg apuel Dated at Ontann. r•alifonnn fbls _27tH day of necenher In 13, 1 J i I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM January 17, 1983 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill liolley, Director, Community Services Department -I- Subject: Agenda Item 3 -L: Landmark Designation 11 D. Cousins Nouse, a k.a the Christmas ilcuse On Thursday, January 6, 1963, the Historic Preservation Commission held a properly noticed and advertised public hearing for the purpose of form - ulattng a recommondation to the City Council on a Landmark designation for the Cousins House On a motion by Commissioner Cooper with a second by Kilmurray, it waa voted to rec,mmoend a landmark designation to the Council. The Omission further added thut it wished it known by the Council that the commission opposed relocating the Cousins House to the City of Ontario, pref,rring it to remain in its present location within I:ancho Cucamonga Staff made no recommendation on this matter to rho Commission and carries the Commission recommendation to Council without comment A•, a side no,,c, several of the Preservation Commissioners will be in rttendance at the Council meeting to offer testlmr ny, most notably, Miss Ada Cooper, who was associated with the County Museum Association at the time the house was turned over to the Florrisons 811/mw 00 d- Mimtes Raorlo ceraaonga ustori- rr,servation Ct+eisaion R�tas reetlot _ Jata,r7 6. 1492 -7x00 Da. l.£om tart Covaomity Center Mendel —2 "Ile- to ,+e'er br c'uitw.� rtrmrs a: 7s06 p.s. Pledge cf Al Legiante lv led by Chairman Strain. 7resent -ere Coodssllcerm Strom, Rlokcos, Cooper and Kl:-mrmy. Absents Ctaaissloaca Armr, milling and White. Mimtes of Decembe, 14, Regolar lceet£og, t-,, rerie -ed. Motions Moved by Cooper, seconded 67 KllRnrray, Miantes of Deeeaba- li, RegoLr Meeting, be approred as poatdf. Motion carried 4-0. :Abmectz Arne, Ilhite and billing.) Ammeee"evb C1LS£.Uan Steam reported on the ssocesa of the Open Mouse held at the Pains' Ranee oo Deceaber 17. She rareorted there were 167 ptopla in attmfaa Pchlle selrim - CmmLas' Hon-.e iCtr£atus HPlse) Staff reported ttat •irast£m Of legal 00tifloatloos concerning this Ptbllc Resrinq for possible reeonmenda"m to City Council for designation as City Ristnrlr Lassa@ for the Chr£stsao Rinse has been receive:!. Comr£asioner K£I —ray regortcd m the several Fbnoa ra21s she had received cmcerud ni the history et the Chris I Dtare. --Ir an Strain opened the rcgbuc Rearing. "ore Jonas reported to Coesission on her beliefs that the Cbristaas Ross& should remain at its present locat£oo and be designated as A City Historic Landrark. She said that this fetLlag had beta expressed to her by other ec==nity residents Ulm. fhe.e trim on fcrther comme.te, Chaizmn Strsee closed the Pcb1£e mans;. Cosalss£oser Kilaarrmy qom tia d the details cf the sale cS the hacse. Ccemm <.i Can;— explained that the bane was given to the San —ty ft— A— ocistiyg, the h¢se to er —tee orecrs tte �A• 11 tin, sold rbrrlu,OW for the pr 0 Eo-a with a to Lace .tar d ap7rex£aately 560,000 -!tb the prc+is£m fiat tl�e "Morrison' aped m ad0itilv3 aaomot for restoration of h te bossse and that it be opened to the ptbllc tell Aye a 7tar bot£oa: ftwed 67 C_xgxv, s_c&fd by tllsormr that the Crake' meow ICbr£stnas Horat), looted at 92CO Ardtbald Ateoce, be resmaeodot to the Cit7 Cooecil foe eesigaat•!= as a Clr7 elsto is lamd"rk. rtx_im c2rrted 6-0. AT3: Gxpc, 511 =ay. P.id and Steam. WES: a¢a,. Ap_,m7r Mflll g,, Wr[te ae. Amer. C---l< rte discussed the historic sigaitJt of the bmse and the laportaece of the 'sae rema£s£mg la its Resent 1 —tiro. rsdfiase£ ... GI1 to Order Pleat of Allegiance Roll WI MhWtes 12 /10/62 Rains' lhuse Open Hm me 0rrLdtllAS House .Orion: Moved by Kilmurray, seconded by Cnoper that the City Council he notified that it is the roconmandation of the Historic Proservation Commission tha. the Christmas House remain on its Prencnt location. Motion carried 4 -0. Abnents Billings, white and Arner. r( mimaien Items - Donated Material Motion, Moved by Cooper, seconded by Kllmtrray, that the Alta Donated Material Lona nook, by Martha Stoats, Hazel Stoebe Billings and Wallace Otocba, be reccaoanded to the City Council for acteptenee into the C.ty Archives. Motion carried 4 -0. Absent. Billings, White and Arner. Hew Dueinens Commissloner Cooper suggested that pictures he taken of Guasti GD4sti CLmp 12 Camp 12, loc..O Perth of Foothill Boulevard. Staff said that could be acrd odd for nast week. Commissioner Cooper to contact staff to set !See and date. Staff reported _hat Lhe City Council had adopted the reconmerlad Etlwanda Cairns Resolution submit�ed by Commission, designating the Etiwanda Cairns a City Historic 1- ,ndmark. Mayor Mikela is to correspond with the University of California at Berkeley and Cal Poly Pomona to request their assistance in obtaining any information on the historic significance of site. Further, Rick Gomez, City Planner reported that the date tw falls under the protective covenants of the California Environmental Quality Act. Public Comment Jeff Scoranka, Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, was Christmas Hazze present a -d wished to comment on his desire that the Christmas House remain at its current location. WOtioni Moved by Hickcox, seconded by Cooper that meeting be Adjournment adjourned. Motion carried 4 -0. Absent, Billings, White and t,ner. Chairman Strand adjourned the meeting at 705 p.m. Reapectfully S mlttee/`d,�bby, ` V Nary MhlC ey Cmmunity Services Department I n fi 1. AFFIDAVIT OF PUMICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN UERNARDIM1O ss f t•nurl6r .1, Pr rrn do hl•rcbv certify that I 5111 the L.y$rl Advertising Arrh of TICS rAILY REPORT a dally newspaper or gerernl cirm!letinn, pulldsh! d In the City of Ontnrlo, County and State aroresald and that The attached aavertitement I Nance air Or e1M[M O CDCIMp N01 = Or lintire n- Put tic (:eai jt177 MniObCe 1.10 ON TN NWDNN<Kiwrw MW INN errWr.lw 4 a 'tn -•r per <D rvntbn rnrn3aa Snn . N� F. eK.N IMIN,ryN Ca^m•nW Crdllr�lli ��yy„1 bn � 5WN CKOnNy. M tw•Nrl If r; nrhn ruearo Plea •CN.1wNNwi,vii.� t� 0 ti I K to +nwr •...�N, it was published m sold newspaper rnr f' s t't r AWN CKYNS4 NMN �' » '""'w "`_• NN �� N di .b ln,Ww NiMM'M �' �� N 1TNw. .IKIwN M 1•'•N .w•[vN Nwlj to Wll De [rllndr 211 �lfG YN C.mwNUry MvN.. D1Ne1. M1r•eD'�M1 pI.NWNIw N sT [NnanC.. C.III.NIr 11JJr. To MW �.NU1 M.� I lip I 1 cc •n> uroler Igr'alty of P rlu t) that the fpmgoing Is true and o:N.NKl'^"':• I NOLL.Y N� j0�� /�ii^r` � rW.NI DNNNr n.1N1 � 1 t� — -`L rV` • ISItf atdrcl s; Dated at Ontarm. •'ybfennn rbw _270 day of nN,•enl �__, l t f1O 1. Zkgf, " wnkl(T ITINERARY FOR MORTGAGE BOND January 19, 1983 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - ITEM 2 - A APPROVAL OF PROGRAM DEPOSIT AGREEMENT 1. Staff Report 2. RDA d Public Comments 3. RDA Approval of Resolution RA 83 -1 which authorizes execution of "Program Deposit Ayreements" with: Lewis Hones Marlborough William Lyon Company and authorizes execution of "Agreement to Increase Reservation" with Marlborough William Lyun Company 4. Chairman Mikels and Secretary Wasserman sign Resolution RA 83 -1 5. Secretary Wassonnan signs "Program Deposit Agreement" with Lewis, Lyon. and Marlborough 6. Secretary Wasserman signs "Agreement to Increase Reserv3t, n" with Lyon and Marlborough CITY COUNCIL - ITEM 5 - C APPROVAL OF APPLICATION TO STATE ALLOCATION COKIITTEE 1 Staff Report 2. C.C.'s d Public Comments 3. C.C. Approval of Resolution 883 -14 ehich authorizes application to the State and then City Manager certification that A. The bond request is $39 million B. 112 of 1% is on deposit C. rile as of January 1 • 4. Mayor Mikels and City Clerk Wasserman sicn Resolution 883 -14 * S. City Manager Wasserman signs certification notice to Allocation Committee " Bond Counsel take signed 8 certified copies of Resolution 883 -14 and certification back eeaning of January 19, 1983. 6649 Hallman Alta Loma, Calif, 91701 January 17, 1989 z The Rancho Cucamonga City Council 9320 Beeline Road Rancho Cucamonga, Calif, 91730 Dear City Council rIembersl RE, Planned Development 82 -05 - Tentative Trait 1230$ - ROY I am writting this letter on behave of my parents Vernon and June Braahear. They reside at the above address, But are out y. of town at this time and ask me to write you in eupoort of the above mentioned change, They have soon the above mentioned plans for 59 condcmi Sum a1 units and feel that it will be good use of acreage. We hove that on January 19, 1982 when you hold your meeting you will approve the change to R -3 /PD. t Sincerely yours, Jean B. Vieau, for Verncn and June Braahear CITY OF,kZICH6 CUCANONGA CITY OF RAKCRO CUCAMONGA ADMINISTR'ATIO / p ADMINISTRATION /JAN Z1 19 AM I AM P ` 5 191101U112 13141516 X3141 G 71819110111112111213$41516 J "1't 41?�- Cc. � /983 Ctiy OF RAHCPO CUCAMONGA �+� ADMINISTRATION j AN 17 19; AM j91mIU�L��lt2�3i9A 6 CcCcl cif ,�ld�7l/iv -y�e"j LTT iZ3vs(/ �?�L2 CC7lZYYLG K . �L %i'L2°P/Lll� I ; rr' 471 Cam, gg73y63 S RESOLUTION NO. 63 -13 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOONIZINO THE CHRLiNAS HOUSE (H.D. COUSINS HOUSE) AS A SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THEREFORE DHSIGNATINO IT AS A CITY H13TORIC LANDMARK. WHEREAS. the Ciy Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, ass adopted Chapter 2. ?4 of the Rrnnho Cucammgn Eunicipal Code relating to hictrric preservation; and WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Historiu Preservation Comisslon has investigated the historic a:gniflcanue of the Christmas House and has held public hearings concerning the Christmas House in accordance with Chapter 2.24 of the Ranch., Cucamonga Municipal Code relating to historlu preservation; and AREAS, the Historic Preservation Commiasion has found the Christmas House to be a significant historic feature of the City, and thereby recommends it for designation as a City Historic Landmark. NOJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rar.,r, Cucamonga, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council finds end determines that the Christmas House (N. D. Cousins House), located at 9240 Archibald Avenue, has met the cr.te,ia established for designation as a City Historic Landmark, and therefore, with the recocmendatio- of the Historic Preservation Commission, de3lE'1ates the Christmas House i. D. Cousins Houser as a City Historic Landmark PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this (19th day of January, 1983.) AYES: a NOES: a ABSENT: a ATTEST: Lauren H. Wasaerman, City Clerk Jon D. Hikels, Mayor Approval of Program Deposit Agreements January 19, 1983 Page 2 The approach that the Lewis Homes will take in the bond issue has been set between the discussions with the bond consultants and City staff. Essentially, Lewis will participate in the bond issue as a primary participant with the understanding that if the rating agency does not recognize Terra vista as a bonffied project to be given strong bond rating, Lewis Homes will agree to take an alternate position with a portion of their request befog absorbed through Marlborough Homes. Therefore, the program deposit agreement with Lewis Homes provides for additional assura,.tes that if the bend issue should have any difficulty in receiving its rating or in its marketing because of the Involvement of Lewis Homes, then the City has the choice of removing Leafs homes as a primary participant and establishing the firm as an alternate with Marlborough. If that should not work, Lewis Hones can be removed entirely from the bond issue, final language of the amendment is being reviewed and the agreement will be forwarded to the Agency prior to the A Resolution has been include) for this program agreement to be approved between the psrticipating develop[- and the Redevelopment Agency. In brief, this Resolution provides: That there is evidence of deposit of one -half of ane pe-cent of bond request. 2. That the deposit is subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement. 3. Directs the Chairman to execute the program agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency. RECD.YENDATICH, It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve t e accompar'Y n9 Resolution authorizing execution of the program deposit egreements. Respectful jy submitted, JACK LAM Deputy Executive 01,ector JL:TJB:jr Att+chcsnts: Example Program Deposit Agreement Authorizing Resolution ..- January 19, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ODDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga "a held in the Lions Park Cocunity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, on Wedneneay, January 19, 1983. The meeting was called to orAer at 7:45 p.m. by Mayor Jon D. Hikels. Present were: City Council members Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet 11, James C. Frost, and Mayor Jon D. Hikels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; CSti Attorney, Roberc Dougherty; Community Devolopment Director, Jack Lm; City Planner, RSuk Gcmtz; City Engineer, Lloyd Numbs; Finance Director, Harry E:pey; and Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Abnont: City Council member Phillip D. Schlosser. Approval of Minutes: December 1, 19829 December 1'i, 1982, and January 5, 1983. Mayor Hikels pointed out that in the announaemenL section of January 5th minutes, it abould reflect Senate Bill 621, net 128. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by ?east to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried 4- 0-1. 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Thursday, January 20, 7:00 p.m., PARES ADVISORY COMMITTEE, Lions Park Community Center. b. Thursday, January 27, 7:00 p.m., ADVISORY COMMISSION, !.Sons Park Communtty Center. c. Thursday, February 10, 6:00 p.m., JOINT CITY COUBCILlPI.ANNING COMMISSION MEETING, Magic Lamp. d. Mayor Mikels read an article from the Nall Street Journal which cited that the City of Rancho Cucamonga spent t'10 less amount of tax money per capita. e. Mayor Mikels presented a pity plaque to San Bernardino County Sheriff Bland thanking him for hio servicrs to the City of Rancho Cucamnga from 1974- 1982. Sheriff Bland had recently retired f. Mr. Wasserman requested that item 5C, Application of Mortgage Bond Issue, be considered at the front of the Agenda since the bond counsel was presented and needed to leave early to catch a plane. Council concurred that it could be handled next since it was the cam item which the RDA dust heard. +e, wnur canner, want over me report again since Chaco a number c^ people present in the audience that were not at the i RDA mating. Mayor Mikela opened the meeting for public hearing. Thera being none, the (1) Public hearing was alosld. City Council Minutes January 19, 1983 Page 2 Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 83 -14 and to waive full reading. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). City Clerk Uaaserman read the title of Resolution No. 83 -14. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -14 A RESOLUTION CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR ALLOCATION OF A MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BOND CONFIRMING PILING OF NOTICE OF SALE WITH THE MORTGAGE BOND ALLOCATION COMMITTEE AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR Councilman Buquet requested that Consent Calendar item "1" be removed for discussion. Councilman Frost requested that item "m" be removed for discussion. a. Approval of Warranta, Register No. 83 -1 -19, in the amount of $364,282.67 b. Approval of Warrants for assessment District 82 -1 for the month of December, 1982 in the amount of $653,794.67. (2) c. Alcoholia Beverage Application for Eugene C. A Virginia De Young, La Pasta Hill, 8241 Foothill Blvd. for on -sale beer A wino eating place. (AB 83.02) (3) d Alcoholic Beverage Application for Mario M. A Yara A. Castelan, eto., Polio Don Luis, 9170 -A Foothill Blvd., for on -sale beer A .nine eating place. (AB 83 -03) (4) e. Approval of consultant contract with Don Owen and Associates as Assessment Engineer and Brown and Nazarek as Bond Counsel for the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District, Assessment District 82 -2. (CO 83 -004 s CO 83 -005) (5j f. Forward claim against the City by John I. Bowser to tie Carl Warren Company for handling. (CL 83 -01) (6) g. 7orward claim against the City by Edward J. and Eleanor Croft to the city attorney for handling. (CL 83 -02) h. Approval to destroy certain City records. (7) RESOLUTION NO. 83 -11 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AID DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PPOVIDED UNDER GOVERK40T CODE SECTION 34090. (8) Approval of Parcel Hap 7689 and real property improvement contract and lien agreement by Stephens: located at the northwest corner of Sump and Fast Avenues. RESOLUTION NO. 83 -12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP 7689 AND REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT. (9) Pelease of Bond: 31te Approval 79 -01, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Beryl Avenue. Owner: Community Baptist Ch:reh. Labor A Material (road) $25,500 City Council Minutes January t9, 1983 Page 3 k. Repucst authorization to seek bids for construotion of a traffic signal at (10) Base Ltne Road and Vineyard Avenue. Construction documents are completed for advertising this pro,jeot which will be coordinated with reoonstruotion Of the A00035 to Alta alma High School parking lots. Estimated coat of the traffic signal work is $55,000. L. Hkstorko proservabioe CoewkssHe r000mewndalkon for Rkstorks Landmark (11) Deskgma ►4s11 far Chrka►mas Raweo, Tho Hko►ot ko presarva►6ea Com"03kes held a pvblko hoarkae on January 6, 3993 and r000rno "da an :'fetorka Landmark Domigna►ksn for the Chrkatmoo Rsvoe 4R.D. Cousin& NovK}. (Item removed for discussion). NLLULUT;ON NO, E3 -33 A RSSOLUI;ON OF TWE CM COUNCIL OF THE C;Tf OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAv CAL;FORN;Ar RECKNI2ING M CSR;; ;Wg HOUSE 49.9. COUFAKS HOUSES AS A SIGRIF;CANT H;MRIG FEATURE OF M CITE OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA AND THCNSFORE DSSIGNATiNG IT AS A GM HISTORIC LANDMARK. a. Approval of ks seaman► Dketrket E24 Conkrae► Change Ordar Ne. 3. (12) Wafersoos work noeamaiketeo kko shanee ardor. Estimated Best to i6y445.00 to be drawn from the erojeetis strook eonbkneeney Fend. (Item removed for discussion). Notion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve the Consent Calendar with the deletion of item3 "1" and "m ". Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). Discussion of Item "m ": After an explanation for the extra work, a motion was aide by Frost, seconded by Dahl to approve the Assessment District 82 -1 Contract Change Order No. 3 for an e3tlrated cost of $6,445.00 to be drawn from the project's street contingency fund. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). (Bonadiman- McCain, Inc CO 185) Discussion or Item "1 ": Mr. Bu4uet noted that council had a copy of the staff's mdeol in light of the feet that the present sale of the house was tied up in the courts, he felt it would not bo timely to vote on this at this time. Motion: Moved by Dahl to move for a continuance. Mr. Frost stated there were members of the H13tOr1WI Commission present to speak to this item. He felt we should hear them. Mayor Hlke13 opened the meeting for public Input. Addressing Council were: *Ada Cooper who gave a summery of the blstorital background of the sale of the house to the present owners. IBruce Whistler asked what was the date of &ale from the County to the present o•.mera, the Morrison. Answer was in 1978. *Catherine Wilson, 6880 Archibald, president of the Women's Cluh of Rancho Cucamonga, read � motion that the club had made to purchane the house conditioned upon the availability of funds. *Laura Jones felt the building was valual,le ano should be kept within the City. There beirt; no further comments [rots the public the Ksyor closed the public portion of the meeting. City COUntil Minutes January 19, 1983 Page q Hr. Frost felt the City needed to do everything possible to protect the historical landm -ks in the City He felt we ahould proceed with the adoption of the Resolution. Hr. Buquet felt the action should be continued to February 2nd. He stated we do not have funds to improve the site if we put a Resolution on this now. Mr. Dahl stated Chet if we kept the house hare, we could enjoy it from the outside. If it were moved to Ouestl then all could enjoy it from the inside. Hr. Buquet felt this did not need to be done tonight,. No would not disagree with the historical designation, but that the timing was wrong since it was tied up in the courts. Mr. Frost stated this was reforred to the Historical Cocoilsslon for consideration and a public hearing was held. Mr. Dahl withdrew his motion. Motion: loved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 83 -13 and to waive Pull reading. 7be following vote wss taken: AYES: Frost, Hikels NOES: Dahl, Buquet ABSENT: Schlosser Hoticn failed on a tie vote. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to continue to February 16. The following vote wan taken: ATBS: Dahl, Buquat NOES: Frost, Mikels LBSBNT: Schlosser Notion failed on a tie vote. Hr. Buquet stated the resolution failed for lack of a majority of the Council. By virtue that the motion failed initially to pass the rosoUttion, then the resolution .sled. He did not want to see it fail, but felt we should continue the itee. Motion: Naved by Dahl to continue until after the court proceedings. Notion failed for lack of a aecond. Councilman Frost stated he would vote for a motion to reconsider the adoption Of the Reaolution itself and set a date for reconsideration for February 2nd. Hr. Buquot stated he had no problem with that and seconded the motion. Mayor Mikels asked for a clarification of the motion. Motion: loved by Frost to reconsider adoption of Resolution 83 -13 and to act a hearing date for February 2nd. Hr. Buquet asked if this could be amended to the second meting in February since the mobile how and atom drain issues will be heard on February 2nd. Mayor Hikels stated he would agree with the motion to continue this to the February 2nd meeting. Mr. Buquet statud that acnording to the minutes of the last meting when they City Council Minutes January 19, 1983 Page 5 discussed the Christmas HOUSe, the motion was in favor of following up on the Option of acquiring the House through the Public /Private Coalition. There were no funds ocmmi -ted. This was a 3 -2 vote and that was to continue in that ®liner. He stated he felt very strongly that this was something that could affect that intent which was ezpressad by Council. mayor ifike:a pointed out that the motion at the previous meeting to co ®it many failed 3 -2. Mr. Buquat stated that was correct, but we are not talking about money nov. Mr. Dahl stated that if Mr. Frost would emend the motion setting the hearing on February 16th, he would second the notion. Mayor Mikels stated that perhaps a motion to table the item would be appropriate. Mr. Buquel. stated he had no problem setting a date as long as its on the 16th or after. Tabling this could be longer than that. Mayor MSkels asked if there were a motion to table. No motion was made. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to reconsider Resolution 83 -13 on February 16. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). 4. PUBLIC HEAR'NGS A. TENTATIVE TRACT 12242 - HUGHES. Appeal of Planning Commission decision (13) requiring a Foc,ued Environmental lvieot Report for a residential tract aubdivision of 18 lots on 4.96 acres of land in the R -1 -89500 (single family residential) zone to be located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Highland Avenue - LPN 201 - 212 -16. Staff report by Rick Gomez, city planner. Mayor Mikels openrd the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: 'Pat Capp, J. P. Capp, consulting civil engineers for the project. He requested that Council reconsider the Planning Commiaeion's decision and let the client proceed with the development of the property. He felt that if the City desired to have an EIR done, then it was the responsibility of the City to get it, not the client. No stated that the client did not wish to be burdened with the responalbllity for the EIR. Motion: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Dahl to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to require a focused Environmental Impact Report and to deny the appeal. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). B. 3 1PD tmultiple family residential /planned development) for the development 59 condominium units on 5.24 acres of land located north of 19th Street, east of Hellman Avenue - APH 201- 232 -34, 54. Staff report by Rick Gomez, city planner. Mr. Gomez stated a petition had been received this evening addressing issues of circulation. Mryor Hikols read the following letter for the record: To Whom It May Concr.n: We are the surrounding neighbors of the development of condominluma and we were wondering if the run off of water from Hollman would be taken care of with the storm drain that will be put in. The north side of the street fills up with water, then it starts running down the south side. We've had garages and houses flooded. In the widening of the street are they planning to use just the land that is owned by the State or buy some from the people. If they plan on buying land, (16) (15) City Council Minutes January 19, 1983 Page 6 will they buy from both sides of the street? We on the south side do not want to be the only ones to lose our land. Because if we ever dociae to sell, we wouldn't get the full value for our land. The Zonroaao's are not in favor of widening the roLd any more than what the State owns, because the use of their front yard is for turning around. Their back yard is not big enough to turn around in. Too traffic along 19th Street is now pretty heavy at times. Even with the road being widened and a turn in for the condominiums, the traffic will be much heavier. The childmi.n who have to cross the street for school in the mornings will have a harder time. Host of the neighbors had already stated their concerns at the meeting. Letter signed by: Boland Bonoli Allen L. Zanrosao Olds Zanrosso Debbie Dutton Jackie Brown Gerald Barker Sharron White Barbara Crossly Lawrence Crossly Glenn H. Kiez Hildren Barker Peter Grltchln Stan Fulton Opal Smith Mal faith Alan Marlow Mayor Mike's opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council wus: Architect for the developer, from 2808 E. Katolla, City of Orange. Tiers being no further public comments, Mayor Hikels closed the public hearing. C'ty Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 188. ORDINANCE NO. 188 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMOHOA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201- 232 -34, 54 LOCATED NORTH OF 19TH STREET, EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE FROM n` -3 TO R -3 /PD. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 188. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). Mr. Buquet asked if anyone was present who had signed the letter and if council had addressed the issues adequately. Jackie Brown was preaent and stated the their questions had been addressed. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 ( Schlosser absent) Mayor Hikels set second reading of Ordinance No. 188 for February 16, 1983, Mayor Mikels called a recess at 0:45 p.m. The mating reconvened at 9:00 p.m. with all members of council and staff present. S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS A. REQUEST TO CONSIDER A GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CHANGE AND ZONING CHANGE OF AN INDUSTRIAL PARK LAND USE. Staff report by Rick Comez, .Sty Planner. Surrounding reoidents have requested the City's consideration of a land use change from Industrial Park to Residential, south of 6th Street between Hellman and Archibald Avenues (Subarea 16). City Council Mir,ut % January 19, 1983 Page 7 Hr, Gomez stated that the City Council should refer this request to the Planning Commission for consideration. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public input. Addressing Council was: *Jerry Eoaki, 9268 Layton, asked council to reconsider the industrial park designation. Since Ontario has opened up residential development, they felt this would be a good time to reconsider this before more develop. nt occurred. There being no further public comments, Mayor Mikels closed the public portion of the meeting. Mr. Buquet askel if he :raa referring to the apartments. He stated he had heard this referred to as a "mistake" by Ontario. Ha wondered If we were making an assumption that this would be all residential. Mayor Mikels asked if there was any opposition to referring this back to the Planning Commission. There were none. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Dahl to refer to the Planning Commission for consideration. Motion carried 4 -0 -1 (Schlosser absent). B CONSIDERATION OF INSTALLATION OF IIICROCO`fPUTER FOR THE FINANCE (16) DEPARTMENT. Staff report by Harry Empey, Finance Director. Hr. E=Poy stated that the funding for this would be as follows: 55$ from RDA 40% from Assessment District 5% from General Fund Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public comment. Thera oeing none, the pvblio portion of the meeting was cloaod. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Buquet to alprove the request conditioned upon approval from the RDA. Motion carried 4 -0 -1. C. APPLICATION OF MORTGAGE BOND ISSUE AMOUNT BEFORE THE MORTGAGE BOND A'-(-'X TION COMMITTEE, Item was discussed at the front of the Agenda. 6. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. Mr. Dougherty stated he had nothing to report. 7. COUNCIL BUSINESS a. Hr. Lam announced that the Terra vista Plan may be coming to the Planning (17) Commission at the next meeting. Staff recommends that Special meetings be set for Council consideration. Council concurred on Monday, February 7, at 7:30 p.m. in the Lions Park Community Center contingent that the Planning Co =lasion has completed their review. b. Councilman Frost announced that on Tuesday, January 25th, the Etiwanda Niatorlcal Aasociatlor, would be meeting. o. Councilman Frost announced the Citrus Belt General Assembly meeting on Wednesday, January 26th. d. Councilman Frost announced that on Thursday, January 27th, there world be a Zone I Flood Control meeting. RD City Counoll Minutes January.19, 1983 Page 8 8. ADJOURNMENT Moticn: Moved by Dahl, ceconded by Frost to adjourn. lotion carried 4•0 -1. The meting adjourned at 9:30 P.m. Respect Cully submitted, _d14 Ca� Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk